{"premises": "The mitchell is offended. The mitchell is mushy. The mitchell exclude the phyllys. The mitchell exclude the valina. The phyllys is bungaloid. The phyllys disqualify the mitchell. The phyllys disqualify the valina. The phyllys exclude the mitchell. The phyllys exclude the valina. The valina is bungaloid. The valina is mushy. The valina disqualify the mitchell. The valina capriole the mitchell. The valina capriole the phyllys. The valina exclude the mitchell. The valina exclude the phyllys. If the mitchell capriole the valina and the valina exclude the mitchell then the mitchell disqualify the phyllys. If something is flat then it disqualify the valina. If something is offended then it capriole the mitchell. If something capriole the mitchell and it capriole the valina then the mitchell disqualify the valina. If something disqualify the mitchell then the mitchell capriole the phyllys. If something disqualify the mitchell then it is flat. If the valina is offended then the valina is mushy. If something is flat then it disqualify the phyllys. The valina disqualify the mitchell.", "logic": "\nOffended(mitchell)\nMushy(mitchell)\nExclude(mitchell, phyllys)\nExclude(mitchell, valina)\nBungaloid(phyllys)\nDisqualify(phyllys, mitchell)\nDisqualify(phyllys, valina)\nExclude(phyllys, mitchell)\nExclude(phyllys, valina)\nBungaloid(valina)\nMushy(valina)\nDisqualify(valina, mitchell)\nCapriole(valina, mitchell)\nCapriole(valina, phyllys)\nExclude(valina, mitchell)\nExclude(valina, phyllys)\nCapriole(mitchell, valina) and Exclude(valina, mitchell) -> Disqualify(mitchell, phyllys)\nforall x (Flat(x) -> Disqualify(x, valina))\nforall x (Offended(x) -> Capriole(x, mitchell))\nforall x (Capriole(x, mitchell) and Capriole(x, valina) -> Disqualify(mitchell, valina))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, mitchell) -> Capriole(mitchell, phyllys))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, mitchell) -> Flat(x))\nOffended(valina) -> Mushy(valina)\nforall x (Flat(x) -> Disqualify(x, phyllys))\n\nDisqualify(valina, mitchell)\n\ntherefore Disqualify(valina, mitchell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The matilde is nonstick. The matilde is rimmed. The matilde polemicise the odele. The matilde polemicise the gerrard. The odele is profitable. The odele powwow the matilde. The odele powwow the gerrard. The odele polemicise the matilde. The odele polemicise the gerrard. The gerrard is profitable. The gerrard is rimmed. The gerrard powwow the matilde. The gerrard cannulate the matilde. The gerrard cannulate the odele. The gerrard polemicise the matilde. The gerrard polemicise the odele. If the matilde cannulate the gerrard and the gerrard polemicise the matilde then the matilde powwow the odele. If something is beardless then it powwow the gerrard. If something is nonstick then it cannulate the matilde. If something cannulate the matilde and it cannulate the gerrard then the matilde powwow the gerrard. If something powwow the matilde then the matilde cannulate the odele. If something powwow the matilde then it is beardless. If the gerrard is nonstick then the gerrard is rimmed. If something is beardless then it powwow the odele. The odele is not profitable.", "logic": "\nNonstick(matilde)\nRimmed(matilde)\nPolemicise(matilde, odele)\nPolemicise(matilde, gerrard)\nProfitable(odele)\nPowwow(odele, matilde)\nPowwow(odele, gerrard)\nPolemicise(odele, matilde)\nPolemicise(odele, gerrard)\nProfitable(gerrard)\nRimmed(gerrard)\nPowwow(gerrard, matilde)\nCannulate(gerrard, matilde)\nCannulate(gerrard, odele)\nPolemicise(gerrard, matilde)\nPolemicise(gerrard, odele)\nCannulate(matilde, gerrard) and Polemicise(gerrard, matilde) -> Powwow(matilde, odele)\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Powwow(x, gerrard))\nforall x (Nonstick(x) -> Cannulate(x, matilde))\nforall x (Cannulate(x, matilde) and Cannulate(x, gerrard) -> Powwow(matilde, gerrard))\nforall x (Powwow(x, matilde) -> Cannulate(matilde, odele))\nforall x (Powwow(x, matilde) -> Beardless(x))\nNonstick(gerrard) -> Rimmed(gerrard)\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Powwow(x, odele))\n\nnot Profitable(odele)\n\ntherefore Profitable(odele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The imogen is headed. The imogen is convolute. The imogen panic the jan. The imogen panic the brandice. The jan is underwater. The jan embellish the imogen. The jan embellish the brandice. The jan panic the imogen. The jan panic the brandice. The brandice is underwater. The brandice is convolute. The brandice embellish the imogen. The brandice include the imogen. The brandice include the jan. The brandice panic the imogen. The brandice panic the jan. If the imogen include the brandice and the brandice panic the imogen then the imogen embellish the jan. If something is elflike then it embellish the brandice. If something is headed then it include the imogen. If something include the imogen and it include the brandice then the imogen embellish the brandice. If something embellish the imogen then the imogen include the jan. If something embellish the imogen then it is elflike. If the brandice is headed then the brandice is convolute. If something is elflike then it embellish the jan. The imogen include the jan.", "logic": "\nHeaded(imogen)\nConvolute(imogen)\nPanic(imogen, jan)\nPanic(imogen, brandice)\nUnderwater(jan)\nEmbellish(jan, imogen)\nEmbellish(jan, brandice)\nPanic(jan, imogen)\nPanic(jan, brandice)\nUnderwater(brandice)\nConvolute(brandice)\nEmbellish(brandice, imogen)\nInclude(brandice, imogen)\nInclude(brandice, jan)\nPanic(brandice, imogen)\nPanic(brandice, jan)\nInclude(imogen, brandice) and Panic(brandice, imogen) -> Embellish(imogen, jan)\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Embellish(x, brandice))\nforall x (Headed(x) -> Include(x, imogen))\nforall x (Include(x, imogen) and Include(x, brandice) -> Embellish(imogen, brandice))\nforall x (Embellish(x, imogen) -> Include(imogen, jan))\nforall x (Embellish(x, imogen) -> Elflike(x))\nHeaded(brandice) -> Convolute(brandice)\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Embellish(x, jan))\n\nInclude(imogen, jan)\n\nEmbellish(brandice, imogen) and forall x (Embellish(x, imogen) -> Include(imogen, jan)) -> therefore Include(imogen, jan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The adelina is maintained. The adelina is deflective. The adelina sling the lust. The adelina sling the chadwick. The lust is uniate. The lust shovel the adelina. The lust shovel the chadwick. The lust sling the adelina. The lust sling the chadwick. The chadwick is uniate. The chadwick is deflective. The chadwick shovel the adelina. The chadwick gentle the adelina. The chadwick gentle the lust. The chadwick sling the adelina. The chadwick sling the lust. If the adelina gentle the chadwick and the chadwick sling the adelina then the adelina shovel the lust. If something is bungled then it shovel the chadwick. If something is maintained then it gentle the adelina. If something gentle the adelina and it gentle the chadwick then the adelina shovel the chadwick. If something shovel the adelina then the adelina gentle the lust. If something shovel the adelina then it is bungled. If the chadwick is maintained then the chadwick is deflective. If something is bungled then it shovel the lust. The lust is not bungled.", "logic": "\nMaintained(adelina)\nDeflective(adelina)\nSling(adelina, lust)\nSling(adelina, chadwick)\nUniate(lust)\nShovel(lust, adelina)\nShovel(lust, chadwick)\nSling(lust, adelina)\nSling(lust, chadwick)\nUniate(chadwick)\nDeflective(chadwick)\nShovel(chadwick, adelina)\nGentle(chadwick, adelina)\nGentle(chadwick, lust)\nSling(chadwick, adelina)\nSling(chadwick, lust)\nGentle(adelina, chadwick) and Sling(chadwick, adelina) -> Shovel(adelina, lust)\nforall x (Bungled(x) -> Shovel(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Maintained(x) -> Gentle(x, adelina))\nforall x (Gentle(x, adelina) and Gentle(x, chadwick) -> Shovel(adelina, chadwick))\nforall x (Shovel(x, adelina) -> Gentle(adelina, lust))\nforall x (Shovel(x, adelina) -> Bungled(x))\nMaintained(chadwick) -> Deflective(chadwick)\nforall x (Bungled(x) -> Shovel(x, lust))\n\nnot Bungled(lust)\n\nShovel(lust, adelina) and forall x (Shovel(x, adelina) -> Bungled(x)) -> therefore Bungled(lust)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The urbain is erythroid. The urbain is molecular. The urbain dulcify the dryke. The urbain dulcify the idaline. The dryke is windward. The dryke catalyse the urbain. The dryke catalyse the idaline. The dryke dulcify the urbain. The dryke dulcify the idaline. The idaline is windward. The idaline is molecular. The idaline catalyse the urbain. The idaline vivisect the urbain. The idaline vivisect the dryke. The idaline dulcify the urbain. The idaline dulcify the dryke. If the urbain vivisect the idaline and the idaline dulcify the urbain then the urbain catalyse the dryke. If something is negligent then it catalyse the idaline. If something is erythroid then it vivisect the urbain. If something vivisect the urbain and it vivisect the idaline then the urbain catalyse the idaline. If something catalyse the urbain then the urbain vivisect the dryke. If something catalyse the urbain then it is negligent. If the idaline is erythroid then the idaline is molecular. If something is negligent then it catalyse the dryke. The idaline catalyse the idaline.", "logic": "\nErythroid(urbain)\nMolecular(urbain)\nDulcify(urbain, dryke)\nDulcify(urbain, idaline)\nWindward(dryke)\nCatalyse(dryke, urbain)\nCatalyse(dryke, idaline)\nDulcify(dryke, urbain)\nDulcify(dryke, idaline)\nWindward(idaline)\nMolecular(idaline)\nCatalyse(idaline, urbain)\nVivisect(idaline, urbain)\nVivisect(idaline, dryke)\nDulcify(idaline, urbain)\nDulcify(idaline, dryke)\nVivisect(urbain, idaline) and Dulcify(idaline, urbain) -> Catalyse(urbain, dryke)\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Catalyse(x, idaline))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) -> Vivisect(x, urbain))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, urbain) and Vivisect(x, idaline) -> Catalyse(urbain, idaline))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, urbain) -> Vivisect(urbain, dryke))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, urbain) -> Negligent(x))\nErythroid(idaline) -> Molecular(idaline)\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Catalyse(x, dryke))\n\nCatalyse(idaline, idaline)\n\nCatalyse(idaline, urbain) and forall x (Catalyse(x, urbain) -> Negligent(x)) -> therefore Negligent(idaline) Negligent(idaline) and forall x (Negligent(x) -> Catalyse(x, idaline)) -> therefore Catalyse(idaline, idaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The thatcher is freehanded. The thatcher is unclothed. The thatcher transfix the maryanna. The thatcher transfix the dorette. The maryanna is satellite. The maryanna infuse the thatcher. The maryanna infuse the dorette. The maryanna transfix the thatcher. The maryanna transfix the dorette. The dorette is satellite. The dorette is unclothed. The dorette infuse the thatcher. The dorette bodypaint the thatcher. The dorette bodypaint the maryanna. The dorette transfix the thatcher. The dorette transfix the maryanna. If the thatcher bodypaint the dorette and the dorette transfix the thatcher then the thatcher infuse the maryanna. If something is colloidal then it infuse the dorette. If something is freehanded then it bodypaint the thatcher. If something bodypaint the thatcher and it bodypaint the dorette then the thatcher infuse the dorette. If something infuse the thatcher then the thatcher bodypaint the maryanna. If something infuse the thatcher then it is colloidal. If the dorette is freehanded then the dorette is unclothed. If something is colloidal then it infuse the maryanna. The dorette does not like the dorette.", "logic": "\nFreehanded(thatcher)\nUnclothed(thatcher)\nTransfix(thatcher, maryanna)\nTransfix(thatcher, dorette)\nSatellite(maryanna)\nInfuse(maryanna, thatcher)\nInfuse(maryanna, dorette)\nTransfix(maryanna, thatcher)\nTransfix(maryanna, dorette)\nSatellite(dorette)\nUnclothed(dorette)\nInfuse(dorette, thatcher)\nBodypaint(dorette, thatcher)\nBodypaint(dorette, maryanna)\nTransfix(dorette, thatcher)\nTransfix(dorette, maryanna)\nBodypaint(thatcher, dorette) and Transfix(dorette, thatcher) -> Infuse(thatcher, maryanna)\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Infuse(x, dorette))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Bodypaint(x, thatcher))\nforall x (Bodypaint(x, thatcher) and Bodypaint(x, dorette) -> Infuse(thatcher, dorette))\nforall x (Infuse(x, thatcher) -> Bodypaint(thatcher, maryanna))\nforall x (Infuse(x, thatcher) -> Colloidal(x))\nFreehanded(dorette) -> Unclothed(dorette)\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Infuse(x, maryanna))\n\nnot Infuse(dorette, dorette)\n\nInfuse(dorette, thatcher) and forall x (Infuse(x, thatcher) -> Colloidal(x)) -> therefore Colloidal(dorette) Colloidal(dorette) and forall x (Colloidal(x) -> Infuse(x, dorette)) -> therefore Infuse(dorette, dorette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The merlina is ecdemic. The merlina is depictive. The merlina ripple the inci. The merlina ripple the dosi. The inci is nonkosher. The inci stand the merlina. The inci stand the dosi. The inci ripple the merlina. The inci ripple the dosi. The dosi is nonkosher. The dosi is depictive. The dosi stand the merlina. The dosi throng the merlina. The dosi throng the inci. The dosi ripple the merlina. The dosi ripple the inci. If the merlina throng the dosi and the dosi ripple the merlina then the merlina stand the inci. If something is sulphurous then it stand the dosi. If something is ecdemic then it throng the merlina. If something throng the merlina and it throng the dosi then the merlina stand the dosi. If something stand the merlina then the merlina throng the inci. If something stand the merlina then it is sulphurous. If the dosi is ecdemic then the dosi is depictive. If something is sulphurous then it stand the inci. The merlina is not sulphurous.", "logic": "\nEcdemic(merlina)\nDepictive(merlina)\nRipple(merlina, inci)\nRipple(merlina, dosi)\nNonkosher(inci)\nStand(inci, merlina)\nStand(inci, dosi)\nRipple(inci, merlina)\nRipple(inci, dosi)\nNonkosher(dosi)\nDepictive(dosi)\nStand(dosi, merlina)\nThrong(dosi, merlina)\nThrong(dosi, inci)\nRipple(dosi, merlina)\nRipple(dosi, inci)\nThrong(merlina, dosi) and Ripple(dosi, merlina) -> Stand(merlina, inci)\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) -> Stand(x, dosi))\nforall x (Ecdemic(x) -> Throng(x, merlina))\nforall x (Throng(x, merlina) and Throng(x, dosi) -> Stand(merlina, dosi))\nforall x (Stand(x, merlina) -> Throng(merlina, inci))\nforall x (Stand(x, merlina) -> Sulphurous(x))\nEcdemic(dosi) -> Depictive(dosi)\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) -> Stand(x, inci))\n\nnot Sulphurous(merlina)\n\nforall x (Stand(x, merlina) -> Sulphurous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The klara is stubborn. The klara is useless. The klara poll the raquela. The klara poll the bessy. The raquela is unranked. The raquela scout the klara. The raquela scout the bessy. The raquela poll the klara. The raquela poll the bessy. The bessy is unranked. The bessy is useless. The bessy scout the klara. The bessy incurvate the klara. The bessy incurvate the raquela. The bessy poll the klara. The bessy poll the raquela. If the klara incurvate the bessy and the bessy poll the klara then the klara scout the raquela. If something is botswanan then it scout the bessy. If something is stubborn then it incurvate the klara. If something incurvate the klara and it incurvate the bessy then the klara scout the bessy. If something scout the klara then the klara incurvate the raquela. If something scout the klara then it is botswanan. If the bessy is stubborn then the bessy is useless. If something is botswanan then it scout the raquela. The klara scout the raquela.", "logic": "\nStubborn(klara)\nUseless(klara)\nPoll(klara, raquela)\nPoll(klara, bessy)\nUnranked(raquela)\nScout(raquela, klara)\nScout(raquela, bessy)\nPoll(raquela, klara)\nPoll(raquela, bessy)\nUnranked(bessy)\nUseless(bessy)\nScout(bessy, klara)\nIncurvate(bessy, klara)\nIncurvate(bessy, raquela)\nPoll(bessy, klara)\nPoll(bessy, raquela)\nIncurvate(klara, bessy) and Poll(bessy, klara) -> Scout(klara, raquela)\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Scout(x, bessy))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Incurvate(x, klara))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, klara) and Incurvate(x, bessy) -> Scout(klara, bessy))\nforall x (Scout(x, klara) -> Incurvate(klara, raquela))\nforall x (Scout(x, klara) -> Botswanan(x))\nStubborn(bessy) -> Useless(bessy)\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Scout(x, raquela))\n\nScout(klara, raquela)\n\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Scout(x, raquela)) <- forall x (Scout(x, klara) -> Botswanan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The deeann is level. The deeann is pagan. The deeann rasterize the chrysler. The deeann rasterize the tybi. The chrysler is allelic. The chrysler tickle the deeann. The chrysler tickle the tybi. The chrysler rasterize the deeann. The chrysler rasterize the tybi. The tybi is allelic. The tybi is pagan. The tybi tickle the deeann. The tybi swot the deeann. The tybi swot the chrysler. The tybi rasterize the deeann. The tybi rasterize the chrysler. If the deeann swot the tybi and the tybi rasterize the deeann then the deeann tickle the chrysler. If something is afire then it tickle the tybi. If something is level then it swot the deeann. If something swot the deeann and it swot the tybi then the deeann tickle the tybi. If something tickle the deeann then the deeann swot the chrysler. If something tickle the deeann then it is afire. If the tybi is level then the tybi is pagan. If something is afire then it tickle the chrysler. The deeann does not like the tybi.", "logic": "\nLevel(deeann)\nPagan(deeann)\nRasterize(deeann, chrysler)\nRasterize(deeann, tybi)\nAllelic(chrysler)\nTickle(chrysler, deeann)\nTickle(chrysler, tybi)\nRasterize(chrysler, deeann)\nRasterize(chrysler, tybi)\nAllelic(tybi)\nPagan(tybi)\nTickle(tybi, deeann)\nSwot(tybi, deeann)\nSwot(tybi, chrysler)\nRasterize(tybi, deeann)\nRasterize(tybi, chrysler)\nSwot(deeann, tybi) and Rasterize(tybi, deeann) -> Tickle(deeann, chrysler)\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Tickle(x, tybi))\nforall x (Level(x) -> Swot(x, deeann))\nforall x (Swot(x, deeann) and Swot(x, tybi) -> Tickle(deeann, tybi))\nforall x (Tickle(x, deeann) -> Swot(deeann, chrysler))\nforall x (Tickle(x, deeann) -> Afire(x))\nLevel(tybi) -> Pagan(tybi)\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Tickle(x, chrysler))\n\nnot Tickle(deeann, tybi)\n\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Tickle(x, tybi)) <- forall x (Tickle(x, deeann) -> Afire(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The albert is thermic. The albert is racy. The albert trash the yolanda. The albert trash the chelsie. The yolanda is waterborne. The yolanda bastinado the albert. The yolanda bastinado the chelsie. The yolanda trash the albert. The yolanda trash the chelsie. The chelsie is waterborne. The chelsie is racy. The chelsie bastinado the albert. The chelsie introduce the albert. The chelsie introduce the yolanda. The chelsie trash the albert. The chelsie trash the yolanda. If the albert introduce the chelsie and the chelsie trash the albert then the albert bastinado the yolanda. If something is arillate then it bastinado the chelsie. If something is thermic then it introduce the albert. If something introduce the albert and it introduce the chelsie then the albert bastinado the chelsie. If something bastinado the albert then the albert introduce the yolanda. If something bastinado the albert then it is arillate. If the chelsie is thermic then the chelsie is racy. If something is arillate then it bastinado the yolanda. The yolanda is green.", "logic": "\nThermic(albert)\nRacy(albert)\nTrash(albert, yolanda)\nTrash(albert, chelsie)\nWaterborne(yolanda)\nBastinado(yolanda, albert)\nBastinado(yolanda, chelsie)\nTrash(yolanda, albert)\nTrash(yolanda, chelsie)\nWaterborne(chelsie)\nRacy(chelsie)\nBastinado(chelsie, albert)\nIntroduce(chelsie, albert)\nIntroduce(chelsie, yolanda)\nTrash(chelsie, albert)\nTrash(chelsie, yolanda)\nIntroduce(albert, chelsie) and Trash(chelsie, albert) -> Bastinado(albert, yolanda)\nforall x (Arillate(x) -> Bastinado(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Thermic(x) -> Introduce(x, albert))\nforall x (Introduce(x, albert) and Introduce(x, chelsie) -> Bastinado(albert, chelsie))\nforall x (Bastinado(x, albert) -> Introduce(albert, yolanda))\nforall x (Bastinado(x, albert) -> Arillate(x))\nThermic(chelsie) -> Racy(chelsie)\nforall x (Arillate(x) -> Bastinado(x, yolanda))\n\nGreen(yolanda)\n\nGreen(yolanda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The doe is epilithic. The doe is frothing. The doe palpitate the tobey. The doe palpitate the bird. The tobey is nectarous. The tobey vivify the doe. The tobey vivify the bird. The tobey palpitate the doe. The tobey palpitate the bird. The bird is nectarous. The bird is frothing. The bird vivify the doe. The bird snag the doe. The bird snag the tobey. The bird palpitate the doe. The bird palpitate the tobey. If the doe snag the bird and the bird palpitate the doe then the doe vivify the tobey. If something is brisant then it vivify the bird. If something is epilithic then it snag the doe. If something snag the doe and it snag the bird then the doe vivify the bird. If something vivify the doe then the doe snag the tobey. If something vivify the doe then it is brisant. If the bird is epilithic then the bird is frothing. If something is brisant then it vivify the tobey. The tobey does not visit the tobey.", "logic": "\nEpilithic(doe)\nFrothing(doe)\nPalpitate(doe, tobey)\nPalpitate(doe, bird)\nNectarous(tobey)\nVivify(tobey, doe)\nVivify(tobey, bird)\nPalpitate(tobey, doe)\nPalpitate(tobey, bird)\nNectarous(bird)\nFrothing(bird)\nVivify(bird, doe)\nSnag(bird, doe)\nSnag(bird, tobey)\nPalpitate(bird, doe)\nPalpitate(bird, tobey)\nSnag(doe, bird) and Palpitate(bird, doe) -> Vivify(doe, tobey)\nforall x (Brisant(x) -> Vivify(x, bird))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) -> Snag(x, doe))\nforall x (Snag(x, doe) and Snag(x, bird) -> Vivify(doe, bird))\nforall x (Vivify(x, doe) -> Snag(doe, tobey))\nforall x (Vivify(x, doe) -> Brisant(x))\nEpilithic(bird) -> Frothing(bird)\nforall x (Brisant(x) -> Vivify(x, tobey))\n\nnot Palpitate(tobey, tobey)\n\nnot Palpitate(tobey, tobey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The duffy is harmless. The duffy is unbroken. The duffy pursue the bevvy. The duffy pursue the louisette. The bevvy is roadless. The bevvy wind the duffy. The bevvy wind the louisette. The bevvy pursue the duffy. The bevvy pursue the louisette. The louisette is roadless. The louisette is unbroken. The louisette wind the duffy. The louisette diffuse the duffy. The louisette diffuse the bevvy. The louisette pursue the duffy. The louisette pursue the bevvy. If the duffy diffuse the louisette and the louisette pursue the duffy then the duffy wind the bevvy. If something is ibsenian then it wind the louisette. If something is harmless then it diffuse the duffy. If something diffuse the duffy and it diffuse the louisette then the duffy wind the louisette. If something wind the duffy then the duffy diffuse the bevvy. If something wind the duffy then it is ibsenian. If the louisette is harmless then the louisette is unbroken. If something is ibsenian then it wind the bevvy. The duffy diffuse the louisette.", "logic": "\nHarmless(duffy)\nUnbroken(duffy)\nPursue(duffy, bevvy)\nPursue(duffy, louisette)\nRoadless(bevvy)\nWind(bevvy, duffy)\nWind(bevvy, louisette)\nPursue(bevvy, duffy)\nPursue(bevvy, louisette)\nRoadless(louisette)\nUnbroken(louisette)\nWind(louisette, duffy)\nDiffuse(louisette, duffy)\nDiffuse(louisette, bevvy)\nPursue(louisette, duffy)\nPursue(louisette, bevvy)\nDiffuse(duffy, louisette) and Pursue(louisette, duffy) -> Wind(duffy, bevvy)\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Wind(x, louisette))\nforall x (Harmless(x) -> Diffuse(x, duffy))\nforall x (Diffuse(x, duffy) and Diffuse(x, louisette) -> Wind(duffy, louisette))\nforall x (Wind(x, duffy) -> Diffuse(duffy, bevvy))\nforall x (Wind(x, duffy) -> Ibsenian(x))\nHarmless(louisette) -> Unbroken(louisette)\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Wind(x, bevvy))\n\nDiffuse(duffy, louisette)\n\nDiffuse(duffy, louisette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-811"} {"premises": "The kalindi peculate the zilvia. The zilvia is addressed. The barbabra peculate the zilvia. If someone crawfish the kalindi then the kalindi crawfish the barbabra. If someone peculate the zilvia then the zilvia crawfish the kalindi. If someone peculate the zilvia then they eat the kalindi. The zilvia is addressed.", "logic": "\nPeculate(kalindi, zilvia)\nAddressed(zilvia)\nPeculate(barbabra, zilvia)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, kalindi) -> Crawfish(kalindi, barbabra))\nforall x (Peculate(x, zilvia) -> Crawfish(zilvia, kalindi))\nforall x (Peculate(x, zilvia) -> Crawfish(x, kalindi))\n\nAddressed(zilvia)\n\ntherefore Addressed(zilvia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The breanne shallow the tildi. The tildi is gregarious. The debor shallow the tildi. If someone cannulate the breanne then the breanne cannulate the debor. If someone shallow the tildi then the tildi cannulate the breanne. If someone shallow the tildi then they eat the breanne. The breanne does not see the tildi.", "logic": "\nShallow(breanne, tildi)\nGregarious(tildi)\nShallow(debor, tildi)\nforall x (Cannulate(x, breanne) -> Cannulate(breanne, debor))\nforall x (Shallow(x, tildi) -> Cannulate(tildi, breanne))\nforall x (Shallow(x, tildi) -> Cannulate(x, breanne))\n\nnot Shallow(breanne, tildi)\n\ntherefore Shallow(breanne, tildi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The tess whizz the phip. The phip is latent. The estell whizz the phip. If someone result the tess then the tess result the estell. If someone whizz the phip then the phip result the tess. If someone whizz the phip then they eat the tess. The estell result the tess.", "logic": "\nWhizz(tess, phip)\nLatent(phip)\nWhizz(estell, phip)\nforall x (Result(x, tess) -> Result(tess, estell))\nforall x (Whizz(x, phip) -> Result(phip, tess))\nforall x (Whizz(x, phip) -> Result(x, tess))\n\nResult(estell, tess)\n\nWhizz(estell, phip) and forall x (Whizz(x, phip) -> Result(x, tess)) -> therefore Result(estell, tess)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The annadiana necrose the cherri. The cherri is meiotic. The georgiana necrose the cherri. If someone remit the annadiana then the annadiana remit the georgiana. If someone necrose the cherri then the cherri remit the annadiana. If someone necrose the cherri then they eat the annadiana. The annadiana does not eat the annadiana.", "logic": "\nNecrose(annadiana, cherri)\nMeiotic(cherri)\nNecrose(georgiana, cherri)\nforall x (Remit(x, annadiana) -> Remit(annadiana, georgiana))\nforall x (Necrose(x, cherri) -> Remit(cherri, annadiana))\nforall x (Necrose(x, cherri) -> Remit(x, annadiana))\n\nnot Remit(annadiana, annadiana)\n\nNecrose(annadiana, cherri) and forall x (Necrose(x, cherri) -> Remit(x, annadiana)) -> therefore Remit(annadiana, annadiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The bentley minimise the jorrie. The jorrie is slushy. The nikita minimise the jorrie. If someone endear the bentley then the bentley endear the nikita. If someone minimise the jorrie then the jorrie endear the bentley. If someone minimise the jorrie then they eat the bentley. The bentley endear the nikita.", "logic": "\nMinimise(bentley, jorrie)\nSlushy(jorrie)\nMinimise(nikita, jorrie)\nforall x (Endear(x, bentley) -> Endear(bentley, nikita))\nforall x (Minimise(x, jorrie) -> Endear(jorrie, bentley))\nforall x (Minimise(x, jorrie) -> Endear(x, bentley))\n\nEndear(bentley, nikita)\n\nMinimise(bentley, jorrie) and forall x (Minimise(x, jorrie) -> Endear(jorrie, bentley)) -> therefore Endear(jorrie, bentley) Endear(jorrie, bentley) and forall x (Endear(x, bentley) -> Endear(bentley, nikita)) -> therefore Endear(bentley, nikita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The shelton contend the sianna. The sianna is funky. The clary contend the sianna. If someone polychrome the shelton then the shelton polychrome the clary. If someone contend the sianna then the sianna polychrome the shelton. If someone contend the sianna then they eat the shelton. The shelton does not eat the clary.", "logic": "\nContend(shelton, sianna)\nFunky(sianna)\nContend(clary, sianna)\nforall x (Polychrome(x, shelton) -> Polychrome(shelton, clary))\nforall x (Contend(x, sianna) -> Polychrome(sianna, shelton))\nforall x (Contend(x, sianna) -> Polychrome(x, shelton))\n\nnot Polychrome(shelton, clary)\n\nContend(shelton, sianna) and forall x (Contend(x, sianna) -> Polychrome(sianna, shelton)) -> therefore Polychrome(sianna, shelton) Polychrome(sianna, shelton) and forall x (Polychrome(x, shelton) -> Polychrome(shelton, clary)) -> therefore Polychrome(shelton, clary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The raine believe the shawna. The shawna is teeny. The charity believe the shawna. If someone explicate the raine then the raine explicate the charity. If someone believe the shawna then the shawna explicate the raine. If someone believe the shawna then they eat the raine. The charity does not chase the shawna.", "logic": "\nBelieve(raine, shawna)\nTeeny(shawna)\nBelieve(charity, shawna)\nforall x (Explicate(x, raine) -> Explicate(raine, charity))\nforall x (Believe(x, shawna) -> Explicate(shawna, raine))\nforall x (Believe(x, shawna) -> Explicate(x, raine))\n\nnot Chases(charity, shawna)\n\nnot Chases(charity, shawna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The xever prefigure the carolie. The carolie is foetid. The frank prefigure the carolie. If someone stagger the xever then the xever stagger the frank. If someone prefigure the carolie then the carolie stagger the xever. If someone prefigure the carolie then they eat the xever. The xever chases the frank.", "logic": "\nPrefigure(xever, carolie)\nFoetid(carolie)\nPrefigure(frank, carolie)\nforall x (Stagger(x, xever) -> Stagger(xever, frank))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, carolie) -> Stagger(carolie, xever))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, carolie) -> Stagger(x, xever))\n\nChases(xever, frank)\n\nChases(xever, frank) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The nara mire the lenore. The lenore is uneatable. The elspeth mire the lenore. If someone retool the nara then the nara retool the elspeth. If someone mire the lenore then the lenore retool the nara. If someone mire the lenore then they eat the nara. The elspeth does not see the nara.", "logic": "\nMire(nara, lenore)\nUneatable(lenore)\nMire(elspeth, lenore)\nforall x (Retool(x, nara) -> Retool(nara, elspeth))\nforall x (Mire(x, lenore) -> Retool(lenore, nara))\nforall x (Mire(x, lenore) -> Retool(x, nara))\n\nnot Mire(elspeth, nara)\n\nnot Mire(elspeth, nara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The franny account the abbey. The abbey is endurable. The hettie account the abbey. If someone naturalise the franny then the franny naturalise the hettie. If someone account the abbey then the abbey naturalise the franny. If someone account the abbey then they eat the franny. The abbey is cold.", "logic": "\nAccount(franny, abbey)\nEndurable(abbey)\nAccount(hettie, abbey)\nforall x (Naturalise(x, franny) -> Naturalise(franny, hettie))\nforall x (Account(x, abbey) -> Naturalise(abbey, franny))\nforall x (Account(x, abbey) -> Naturalise(x, franny))\n\nCold(abbey)\n\nCold(abbey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The kathlene signify the sherline. The sherline is askew. The osmund signify the sherline. If someone prop the kathlene then the kathlene prop the osmund. If someone signify the sherline then the sherline prop the kathlene. If someone signify the sherline then they eat the kathlene. The osmund does not eat the osmund.", "logic": "\nSignify(kathlene, sherline)\nAskew(sherline)\nSignify(osmund, sherline)\nforall x (Prop(x, kathlene) -> Prop(kathlene, osmund))\nforall x (Signify(x, sherline) -> Prop(sherline, kathlene))\nforall x (Signify(x, sherline) -> Prop(x, kathlene))\n\nnot Prop(osmund, osmund)\n\nnot Prop(osmund, osmund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The dacia restock the creighton. The creighton is curatorial. The marla restock the creighton. If someone gibber the dacia then the dacia gibber the marla. If someone restock the creighton then the creighton gibber the dacia. If someone restock the creighton then they eat the dacia. The dacia is curatorial.", "logic": "\nRestock(dacia, creighton)\nCuratorial(creighton)\nRestock(marla, creighton)\nforall x (Gibber(x, dacia) -> Gibber(dacia, marla))\nforall x (Restock(x, creighton) -> Gibber(creighton, dacia))\nforall x (Restock(x, creighton) -> Gibber(x, dacia))\n\nCuratorial(dacia)\n\nCuratorial(dacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Suzetta is laconic. Suzetta is princely. Suzetta is unspent. Suzetta is arthralgic. Clarance is unspent. Clarance is stalinist. Clarance is arthralgic. If something is arthralgic and unspent then it is laconic. If Clarance is nourished and Clarance is arthralgic then Clarance is laconic. If something is laconic then it is princely. Suzetta is laconic.", "logic": "\nLaconic(suzetta)\nPrincely(suzetta)\nUnspent(suzetta)\nArthralgic(suzetta)\nUnspent(clarance)\nStalinist(clarance)\nArthralgic(clarance)\nforall x (Arthralgic(x) and Unspent(x) -> Laconic(x))\nNourished(clarance) and Arthralgic(clarance) -> Laconic(clarance)\nforall x (Laconic(x) -> Princely(x))\n\nLaconic(suzetta)\n\ntherefore Laconic(suzetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Jessamine is graduated. Jessamine is tubed. Jessamine is palpitant. Jessamine is saharan. Murielle is palpitant. Murielle is chance. Murielle is saharan. If something is saharan and palpitant then it is graduated. If Murielle is unextended and Murielle is saharan then Murielle is graduated. If something is graduated then it is tubed. Murielle is not saharan.", "logic": "\nGraduated(jessamine)\nTubed(jessamine)\nPalpitant(jessamine)\nSaharan(jessamine)\nPalpitant(murielle)\nChance(murielle)\nSaharan(murielle)\nforall x (Saharan(x) and Palpitant(x) -> Graduated(x))\nUnextended(murielle) and Saharan(murielle) -> Graduated(murielle)\nforall x (Graduated(x) -> Tubed(x))\n\nnot Saharan(murielle)\n\ntherefore Saharan(murielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Maia is underclass. Maia is headed. Maia is forty. Maia is rifled. Leena is forty. Leena is unsugared. Leena is rifled. If something is rifled and forty then it is underclass. If Leena is pyogenic and Leena is rifled then Leena is underclass. If something is underclass then it is headed. Leena is underclass.", "logic": "\nUnderclass(maia)\nHeaded(maia)\nForty(maia)\nRifled(maia)\nForty(leena)\nUnsugared(leena)\nRifled(leena)\nforall x (Rifled(x) and Forty(x) -> Underclass(x))\nPyogenic(leena) and Rifled(leena) -> Underclass(leena)\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Headed(x))\n\nUnderclass(leena)\n\nRifled(leena) and Forty(leena) and forall x (Rifled(x) and Forty(x) -> Underclass(x)) -> therefore Underclass(leena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Carie is womanish. Carie is unburied. Carie is monophonic. Carie is blighted. Lizzy is monophonic. Lizzy is overhead. Lizzy is blighted. If something is blighted and monophonic then it is womanish. If Lizzy is trusty and Lizzy is blighted then Lizzy is womanish. If something is womanish then it is unburied. Lizzy is not womanish.", "logic": "\nWomanish(carie)\nUnburied(carie)\nMonophonic(carie)\nBlighted(carie)\nMonophonic(lizzy)\nOverhead(lizzy)\nBlighted(lizzy)\nforall x (Blighted(x) and Monophonic(x) -> Womanish(x))\nTrusty(lizzy) and Blighted(lizzy) -> Womanish(lizzy)\nforall x (Womanish(x) -> Unburied(x))\n\nnot Womanish(lizzy)\n\nBlighted(lizzy) and Monophonic(lizzy) and forall x (Blighted(x) and Monophonic(x) -> Womanish(x)) -> therefore Womanish(lizzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Orville is divisive. Orville is unsung. Orville is nodding. Orville is pockmarked. Claudine is nodding. Claudine is dissident. Claudine is pockmarked. If something is pockmarked and nodding then it is divisive. If Claudine is vermiform and Claudine is pockmarked then Claudine is divisive. If something is divisive then it is unsung. Claudine is unsung.", "logic": "\nDivisive(orville)\nUnsung(orville)\nNodding(orville)\nPockmarked(orville)\nNodding(claudine)\nDissident(claudine)\nPockmarked(claudine)\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) and Nodding(x) -> Divisive(x))\nVermiform(claudine) and Pockmarked(claudine) -> Divisive(claudine)\nforall x (Divisive(x) -> Unsung(x))\n\nUnsung(claudine)\n\nPockmarked(claudine) and Nodding(claudine) and forall x (Pockmarked(x) and Nodding(x) -> Divisive(x)) -> therefore Divisive(claudine) Divisive(claudine) and forall x (Divisive(x) -> Unsung(x)) -> therefore Unsung(claudine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Teena is oscine. Teena is ablated. Teena is dated. Teena is bellyless. Hetty is dated. Hetty is vented. Hetty is bellyless. If something is bellyless and dated then it is oscine. If Hetty is congruent and Hetty is bellyless then Hetty is oscine. If something is oscine then it is ablated. Hetty is not ablated.", "logic": "\nOscine(teena)\nAblated(teena)\nDated(teena)\nBellyless(teena)\nDated(hetty)\nVented(hetty)\nBellyless(hetty)\nforall x (Bellyless(x) and Dated(x) -> Oscine(x))\nCongruent(hetty) and Bellyless(hetty) -> Oscine(hetty)\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Ablated(x))\n\nnot Ablated(hetty)\n\nBellyless(hetty) and Dated(hetty) and forall x (Bellyless(x) and Dated(x) -> Oscine(x)) -> therefore Oscine(hetty) Oscine(hetty) and forall x (Oscine(x) -> Ablated(x)) -> therefore Ablated(hetty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Graeme is homesick. Graeme is creole. Graeme is frowsty. Graeme is piscine. Thorpe is frowsty. Thorpe is aramaean. Thorpe is piscine. If something is piscine and frowsty then it is homesick. If Thorpe is balsamy and Thorpe is piscine then Thorpe is homesick. If something is homesick then it is creole. Graeme is not round.", "logic": "\nHomesick(graeme)\nCreole(graeme)\nFrowsty(graeme)\nPiscine(graeme)\nFrowsty(thorpe)\nAramaean(thorpe)\nPiscine(thorpe)\nforall x (Piscine(x) and Frowsty(x) -> Homesick(x))\nBalsamy(thorpe) and Piscine(thorpe) -> Homesick(thorpe)\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Creole(x))\n\nnot Round(graeme)\n\nnot Round(graeme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Sargent is surplus. Sargent is anguine. Sargent is wireless. Sargent is perforated. Kaiser is wireless. Kaiser is flawless. Kaiser is perforated. If something is perforated and wireless then it is surplus. If Kaiser is tapered and Kaiser is perforated then Kaiser is surplus. If something is surplus then it is anguine. Kaiser is round.", "logic": "\nSurplus(sargent)\nAnguine(sargent)\nWireless(sargent)\nPerforated(sargent)\nWireless(kaiser)\nFlawless(kaiser)\nPerforated(kaiser)\nforall x (Perforated(x) and Wireless(x) -> Surplus(x))\nTapered(kaiser) and Perforated(kaiser) -> Surplus(kaiser)\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Anguine(x))\n\nRound(kaiser)\n\nRound(kaiser) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Partha is allusive. Partha is amphibian. Partha is narial. Partha is hypertonic. Eugene is narial. Eugene is tenor. Eugene is hypertonic. If something is hypertonic and narial then it is allusive. If Eugene is tinned and Eugene is hypertonic then Eugene is allusive. If something is allusive then it is amphibian. Eugene is not tinned.", "logic": "\nAllusive(partha)\nAmphibian(partha)\nNarial(partha)\nHypertonic(partha)\nNarial(eugene)\nTenor(eugene)\nHypertonic(eugene)\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) and Narial(x) -> Allusive(x))\nTinned(eugene) and Hypertonic(eugene) -> Allusive(eugene)\nforall x (Allusive(x) -> Amphibian(x))\n\nnot Tinned(eugene)\n\nnot Tinned(eugene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Yancey is monogenic. Yancey is annulated. Yancey is sleety. Yancey is ismaili. Onlea is sleety. Onlea is tautologic. Onlea is ismaili. If something is ismaili and sleety then it is monogenic. If Onlea is gentile and Onlea is ismaili then Onlea is monogenic. If something is monogenic then it is annulated. Yancey is tautologic.", "logic": "\nMonogenic(yancey)\nAnnulated(yancey)\nSleety(yancey)\nIsmaili(yancey)\nSleety(onlea)\nTautologic(onlea)\nIsmaili(onlea)\nforall x (Ismaili(x) and Sleety(x) -> Monogenic(x))\nGentile(onlea) and Ismaili(onlea) -> Monogenic(onlea)\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> Annulated(x))\n\nTautologic(yancey)\n\nTautologic(yancey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Kore is heady. Kore is strung. Shurlock is pudendal. Laurence is nonchalant. Laurence is reigning. Laurence is unexplored. Lucia is unexplored. Smart things are nonchalant. All reigning things are unexplored. Round, pudendal things are heady. If Lucia is medical then Lucia is strung. Smart things are nonchalant. All unexplored, nonchalant things are medical. Laurence is reigning.", "logic": "\nHeady(kore)\nStrung(kore)\nPudendal(shurlock)\nNonchalant(laurence)\nReigning(laurence)\nUnexplored(laurence)\nUnexplored(lucia)\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Nonchalant(x))\nforall x (Reigning(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Medical(x) and Pudendal(x) -> Heady(x))\nMedical(lucia) -> Strung(lucia)\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Nonchalant(x))\nforall x (Unexplored(x) and Nonchalant(x) -> Medical(x))\n\nReigning(laurence)\n\ntherefore Reigning(laurence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Zane is formosan. Zane is restrained. Nell is mismatched. Terri is bibliotic. Terri is unshared. Terri is insensate. Missy is insensate. Smart things are bibliotic. All unshared things are insensate. Round, mismatched things are formosan. If Missy is esthetic then Missy is restrained. Smart things are bibliotic. All insensate, bibliotic things are esthetic. Zane is not formosan.", "logic": "\nFormosan(zane)\nRestrained(zane)\nMismatched(nell)\nBibliotic(terri)\nUnshared(terri)\nInsensate(terri)\nInsensate(missy)\nforall x (Insensate(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Unshared(x) -> Insensate(x))\nforall x (Esthetic(x) and Mismatched(x) -> Formosan(x))\nEsthetic(missy) -> Restrained(missy)\nforall x (Insensate(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Insensate(x) and Bibliotic(x) -> Esthetic(x))\n\nnot Formosan(zane)\n\ntherefore Formosan(zane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Moises is unlicensed. Moises is exogamic. Arabela is mousy. Ambrose is algometric. Ambrose is enfeebling. Ambrose is inductive. Darien is inductive. Smart things are algometric. All enfeebling things are inductive. Round, mousy things are unlicensed. If Darien is nubile then Darien is exogamic. Smart things are algometric. All inductive, algometric things are nubile. Ambrose is nubile.", "logic": "\nUnlicensed(moises)\nExogamic(moises)\nMousy(arabela)\nAlgometric(ambrose)\nEnfeebling(ambrose)\nInductive(ambrose)\nInductive(darien)\nforall x (Inductive(x) -> Algometric(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) -> Inductive(x))\nforall x (Nubile(x) and Mousy(x) -> Unlicensed(x))\nNubile(darien) -> Exogamic(darien)\nforall x (Inductive(x) -> Algometric(x))\nforall x (Inductive(x) and Algometric(x) -> Nubile(x))\n\nNubile(ambrose)\n\nInductive(ambrose) and Algometric(ambrose) and forall x (Inductive(x) and Algometric(x) -> Nubile(x)) -> therefore Nubile(ambrose)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Sancho is botonnee. Sancho is spanish. Aile is skeletal. Ninette is human. Ninette is zippy. Ninette is unearned. Darrel is unearned. Smart things are human. All zippy things are unearned. Round, skeletal things are botonnee. If Darrel is foiled then Darrel is spanish. Smart things are human. All unearned, human things are foiled. Darrel is not human.", "logic": "\nBotonnee(sancho)\nSpanish(sancho)\nSkeletal(aile)\nHuman(ninette)\nZippy(ninette)\nUnearned(ninette)\nUnearned(darrel)\nforall x (Unearned(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Zippy(x) -> Unearned(x))\nforall x (Foiled(x) and Skeletal(x) -> Botonnee(x))\nFoiled(darrel) -> Spanish(darrel)\nforall x (Unearned(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Unearned(x) and Human(x) -> Foiled(x))\n\nnot Human(darrel)\n\nUnearned(darrel) and forall x (Unearned(x) -> Human(x)) -> therefore Human(darrel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Zilvia is astonished. Zilvia is osseous. Richard is watered. Jonny is squirting. Jonny is invitatory. Jonny is fleet. Tella is fleet. Smart things are squirting. All invitatory things are fleet. Round, watered things are astonished. If Tella is bellying then Tella is osseous. Smart things are squirting. All fleet, squirting things are bellying. Tella is bellying.", "logic": "\nAstonished(zilvia)\nOsseous(zilvia)\nWatered(richard)\nSquirting(jonny)\nInvitatory(jonny)\nFleet(jonny)\nFleet(tella)\nforall x (Fleet(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Fleet(x))\nforall x (Bellying(x) and Watered(x) -> Astonished(x))\nBellying(tella) -> Osseous(tella)\nforall x (Fleet(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Fleet(x) and Squirting(x) -> Bellying(x))\n\nBellying(tella)\n\nFleet(tella) and forall x (Fleet(x) -> Squirting(x)) -> therefore Squirting(tella) Fleet(tella) and Squirting(tella) and forall x (Fleet(x) and Squirting(x) -> Bellying(x)) -> therefore Bellying(tella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Gunvor is bareheaded. Gunvor is iron. Kristian is flavourous. Trixy is knockout. Trixy is clouded. Trixy is unsexy. Eula is unsexy. Smart things are knockout. All clouded things are unsexy. Round, flavourous things are bareheaded. If Eula is prefatory then Eula is iron. Smart things are knockout. All unsexy, knockout things are prefatory. Eula is not prefatory.", "logic": "\nBareheaded(gunvor)\nIron(gunvor)\nFlavourous(kristian)\nKnockout(trixy)\nClouded(trixy)\nUnsexy(trixy)\nUnsexy(eula)\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Knockout(x))\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Prefatory(x) and Flavourous(x) -> Bareheaded(x))\nPrefatory(eula) -> Iron(eula)\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Knockout(x))\nforall x (Unsexy(x) and Knockout(x) -> Prefatory(x))\n\nnot Prefatory(eula)\n\nUnsexy(eula) and forall x (Unsexy(x) -> Knockout(x)) -> therefore Knockout(eula) Unsexy(eula) and Knockout(eula) and forall x (Unsexy(x) and Knockout(x) -> Prefatory(x)) -> therefore Prefatory(eula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Reagan is hesitating. Reagan is mongoloid. Phaedra is arrayed. Kit is alaskan. Kit is simple. Kit is cismontane. Eleni is cismontane. Smart things are alaskan. All simple things are cismontane. Round, arrayed things are hesitating. If Eleni is spangly then Eleni is mongoloid. Smart things are alaskan. All cismontane, alaskan things are spangly. Reagan is not alaskan.", "logic": "\nHesitating(reagan)\nMongoloid(reagan)\nArrayed(phaedra)\nAlaskan(kit)\nSimple(kit)\nCismontane(kit)\nCismontane(eleni)\nforall x (Cismontane(x) -> Alaskan(x))\nforall x (Simple(x) -> Cismontane(x))\nforall x (Spangly(x) and Arrayed(x) -> Hesitating(x))\nSpangly(eleni) -> Mongoloid(eleni)\nforall x (Cismontane(x) -> Alaskan(x))\nforall x (Cismontane(x) and Alaskan(x) -> Spangly(x))\n\nnot Alaskan(reagan)\n\nforall x (Cismontane(x) -> Alaskan(x)) <- forall x (Simple(x) -> Cismontane(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Crista is caliginous. Crista is graspable. Harald is bifocal. Gerianna is adoptable. Gerianna is swingy. Gerianna is heretical. Rosemaria is heretical. Smart things are adoptable. All swingy things are heretical. Round, bifocal things are caliginous. If Rosemaria is unbacked then Rosemaria is graspable. Smart things are adoptable. All heretical, adoptable things are unbacked. Harald is unbacked.", "logic": "\nCaliginous(crista)\nGraspable(crista)\nBifocal(harald)\nAdoptable(gerianna)\nSwingy(gerianna)\nHeretical(gerianna)\nHeretical(rosemaria)\nforall x (Heretical(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Swingy(x) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) and Bifocal(x) -> Caliginous(x))\nUnbacked(rosemaria) -> Graspable(rosemaria)\nforall x (Heretical(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Heretical(x) and Adoptable(x) -> Unbacked(x))\n\nUnbacked(harald)\n\nforall x (Heretical(x) and Adoptable(x) -> Unbacked(x)) <- forall x (Swingy(x) -> Heretical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Ursula is bedaubed. Ursula is peckish. Harriet is exuberant. Marmaduke is semiformal. Marmaduke is usurious. Marmaduke is lettered. Cristal is lettered. Smart things are semiformal. All usurious things are lettered. Round, exuberant things are bedaubed. If Cristal is reciprocal then Cristal is peckish. Smart things are semiformal. All lettered, semiformal things are reciprocal. Ursula is not reciprocal.", "logic": "\nBedaubed(ursula)\nPeckish(ursula)\nExuberant(harriet)\nSemiformal(marmaduke)\nUsurious(marmaduke)\nLettered(marmaduke)\nLettered(cristal)\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Semiformal(x))\nforall x (Usurious(x) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Reciprocal(x) and Exuberant(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nReciprocal(cristal) -> Peckish(cristal)\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Semiformal(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Semiformal(x) -> Reciprocal(x))\n\nnot Reciprocal(ursula)\n\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Semiformal(x) -> Reciprocal(x)) <- forall x (Usurious(x) -> Lettered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Helen is unrevealed. Helen is fantastic. Bird is ploughed. Romy is movable. Romy is axial. Romy is mystic. Renel is mystic. Smart things are movable. All axial things are mystic. Round, ploughed things are unrevealed. If Renel is nonliving then Renel is fantastic. Smart things are movable. All mystic, movable things are nonliving. Helen is axial.", "logic": "\nUnrevealed(helen)\nFantastic(helen)\nPloughed(bird)\nMovable(romy)\nAxial(romy)\nMystic(romy)\nMystic(renel)\nforall x (Mystic(x) -> Movable(x))\nforall x (Axial(x) -> Mystic(x))\nforall x (Nonliving(x) and Ploughed(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nNonliving(renel) -> Fantastic(renel)\nforall x (Mystic(x) -> Movable(x))\nforall x (Mystic(x) and Movable(x) -> Nonliving(x))\n\nAxial(helen)\n\nAxial(helen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Selig is acetabular. Selig is laconic. Marys is toilsome. Danila is indebted. Danila is purulent. Danila is israeli. Marne is israeli. Smart things are indebted. All purulent things are israeli. Round, toilsome things are acetabular. If Marne is maxi then Marne is laconic. Smart things are indebted. All israeli, indebted things are maxi. Selig is not toilsome.", "logic": "\nAcetabular(selig)\nLaconic(selig)\nToilsome(marys)\nIndebted(danila)\nPurulent(danila)\nIsraeli(danila)\nIsraeli(marne)\nforall x (Israeli(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Maxi(x) and Toilsome(x) -> Acetabular(x))\nMaxi(marne) -> Laconic(marne)\nforall x (Israeli(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Israeli(x) and Indebted(x) -> Maxi(x))\n\nnot Toilsome(selig)\n\nnot Toilsome(selig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Timmi is annular. Timmi is trustful. Evangelia is ancestral. Shannon is gorgeous. Shannon is loverlike. Shannon is saponified. Jonas is saponified. Smart things are gorgeous. All loverlike things are saponified. Round, ancestral things are annular. If Jonas is ladylike then Jonas is trustful. Smart things are gorgeous. All saponified, gorgeous things are ladylike. Shannon is trustful.", "logic": "\nAnnular(timmi)\nTrustful(timmi)\nAncestral(evangelia)\nGorgeous(shannon)\nLoverlike(shannon)\nSaponified(shannon)\nSaponified(jonas)\nforall x (Saponified(x) -> Gorgeous(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Saponified(x))\nforall x (Ladylike(x) and Ancestral(x) -> Annular(x))\nLadylike(jonas) -> Trustful(jonas)\nforall x (Saponified(x) -> Gorgeous(x))\nforall x (Saponified(x) and Gorgeous(x) -> Ladylike(x))\n\nTrustful(shannon)\n\nTrustful(shannon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "James is sedative. James is alveolate. Alonzo is sedative. If something is sedative then it is alveolate. If something is alveolate and longish then it is bare. Kind, alveolate things are longish. James is sedative.", "logic": "\nSedative(james)\nAlveolate(james)\nSedative(alonzo)\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Alveolate(x) and Longish(x) -> Bare(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) and Alveolate(x) -> Longish(x))\n\nSedative(james)\n\ntherefore Sedative(james)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Malinda is eucaryotic. Malinda is waning. Pat is eucaryotic. If something is eucaryotic then it is waning. If something is waning and unfaithful then it is mercerized. Kind, waning things are unfaithful. Malinda is not eucaryotic.", "logic": "\nEucaryotic(malinda)\nWaning(malinda)\nEucaryotic(pat)\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Waning(x))\nforall x (Waning(x) and Unfaithful(x) -> Mercerized(x))\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) and Waning(x) -> Unfaithful(x))\n\nnot Eucaryotic(malinda)\n\ntherefore Eucaryotic(malinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Titos is corny. Titos is trigonal. Sula is corny. If something is corny then it is trigonal. If something is trigonal and aural then it is kuwaiti. Kind, trigonal things are aural. Sula is trigonal.", "logic": "\nCorny(titos)\nTrigonal(titos)\nCorny(sula)\nforall x (Corny(x) -> Trigonal(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) and Aural(x) -> Kuwaiti(x))\nforall x (Corny(x) and Trigonal(x) -> Aural(x))\n\nTrigonal(sula)\n\nCorny(sula) and forall x (Corny(x) -> Trigonal(x)) -> therefore Trigonal(sula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Brandy is amino. Brandy is clathrate. Maxy is amino. If something is amino then it is clathrate. If something is clathrate and consultive then it is reconciled. Kind, clathrate things are consultive. Maxy is not clathrate.", "logic": "\nAmino(brandy)\nClathrate(brandy)\nAmino(maxy)\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Clathrate(x))\nforall x (Clathrate(x) and Consultive(x) -> Reconciled(x))\nforall x (Amino(x) and Clathrate(x) -> Consultive(x))\n\nnot Clathrate(maxy)\n\nAmino(maxy) and forall x (Amino(x) -> Clathrate(x)) -> therefore Clathrate(maxy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Ishmael is neotenous. Ishmael is soft. Flore is neotenous. If something is neotenous then it is soft. If something is soft and cocky then it is downstream. Kind, soft things are cocky. Flore is cocky.", "logic": "\nNeotenous(ishmael)\nSoft(ishmael)\nNeotenous(flore)\nforall x (Neotenous(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) and Cocky(x) -> Downstream(x))\nforall x (Neotenous(x) and Soft(x) -> Cocky(x))\n\nCocky(flore)\n\nNeotenous(flore) and forall x (Neotenous(x) -> Soft(x)) -> therefore Soft(flore) Neotenous(flore) and Soft(flore) and forall x (Neotenous(x) and Soft(x) -> Cocky(x)) -> therefore Cocky(flore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Samuele is nigerian. Samuele is invincible. Peggi is nigerian. If something is nigerian then it is invincible. If something is invincible and slick then it is pleased. Kind, invincible things are slick. Peggi is not slick.", "logic": "\nNigerian(samuele)\nInvincible(samuele)\nNigerian(peggi)\nforall x (Nigerian(x) -> Invincible(x))\nforall x (Invincible(x) and Slick(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) and Invincible(x) -> Slick(x))\n\nnot Slick(peggi)\n\nNigerian(peggi) and forall x (Nigerian(x) -> Invincible(x)) -> therefore Invincible(peggi) Nigerian(peggi) and Invincible(peggi) and forall x (Nigerian(x) and Invincible(x) -> Slick(x)) -> therefore Slick(peggi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Nichols is outcaste. Nichols is depicted. Win is outcaste. If something is outcaste then it is depicted. If something is depicted and untutored then it is beadlike. Kind, depicted things are untutored. Nichols is not big.", "logic": "\nOutcaste(nichols)\nDepicted(nichols)\nOutcaste(win)\nforall x (Outcaste(x) -> Depicted(x))\nforall x (Depicted(x) and Untutored(x) -> Beadlike(x))\nforall x (Outcaste(x) and Depicted(x) -> Untutored(x))\n\nnot Big(nichols)\n\nnot Big(nichols) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Meg is thwarting. Meg is innate. Johnathan is thwarting. If something is thwarting then it is innate. If something is innate and welcome then it is sacrosanct. Kind, innate things are welcome. Johnathan is young.", "logic": "\nThwarting(meg)\nInnate(meg)\nThwarting(johnathan)\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Innate(x))\nforall x (Innate(x) and Welcome(x) -> Sacrosanct(x))\nforall x (Thwarting(x) and Innate(x) -> Welcome(x))\n\nYoung(johnathan)\n\nYoung(johnathan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Roselin is exploited. Roselin is aeriferous. Binni is exploited. If something is exploited then it is aeriferous. If something is aeriferous and webby then it is impalpable. Kind, aeriferous things are webby. Roselin is not cold.", "logic": "\nExploited(roselin)\nAeriferous(roselin)\nExploited(binni)\nforall x (Exploited(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) and Webby(x) -> Impalpable(x))\nforall x (Exploited(x) and Aeriferous(x) -> Webby(x))\n\nnot Cold(roselin)\n\nnot Cold(roselin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Sascha is incendiary. Sascha is reposeful. Blanche is incendiary. If something is incendiary then it is reposeful. If something is reposeful and cunning then it is singsong. Kind, reposeful things are cunning. Blanche is cold.", "logic": "\nIncendiary(sascha)\nReposeful(sascha)\nIncendiary(blanche)\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) and Cunning(x) -> Singsong(x))\nforall x (Incendiary(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Cunning(x))\n\nCold(blanche)\n\nCold(blanche) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Jemimah is minded. Jemimah is sabbatical. Florinda is minded. If something is minded then it is sabbatical. If something is sabbatical and sweltering then it is acrobatic. Kind, sabbatical things are sweltering. Jemimah is not young.", "logic": "\nMinded(jemimah)\nSabbatical(jemimah)\nMinded(florinda)\nforall x (Minded(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\nforall x (Sabbatical(x) and Sweltering(x) -> Acrobatic(x))\nforall x (Minded(x) and Sabbatical(x) -> Sweltering(x))\n\nnot Young(jemimah)\n\nnot Young(jemimah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Vite is clawed. Vite is cheeselike. Kenyon is clawed. If something is clawed then it is cheeselike. If something is cheeselike and discordant then it is mural. Kind, cheeselike things are discordant. Kenyon is big.", "logic": "\nClawed(vite)\nCheeselike(vite)\nClawed(kenyon)\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\nforall x (Cheeselike(x) and Discordant(x) -> Mural(x))\nforall x (Clawed(x) and Cheeselike(x) -> Discordant(x))\n\nBig(kenyon)\n\nBig(kenyon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-726"} {"premises": "Erica is subaquatic. Erica is terminable. Issy is colorfast. All colorfast things are liberal. Round things are colorfast. Round, subaquatic things are colorfast. Rough things are colorfast. If Erica is subaquatic and Erica is overladen then Erica is inhibitory. If Erica is inhibitory then Erica is terminable. Furry things are terminable. All subaquatic, inhibitory things are liberal. Erica is subaquatic.", "logic": "\nSubaquatic(erica)\nTerminable(erica)\nColorfast(issy)\nforall x (Colorfast(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) and Subaquatic(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nSubaquatic(erica) and Overladen(erica) -> Inhibitory(erica)\nInhibitory(erica) -> Terminable(erica)\nforall x (Liberal(x) -> Terminable(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) and Inhibitory(x) -> Liberal(x))\n\nSubaquatic(erica)\n\ntherefore Subaquatic(erica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Leonardo is pedigreed. Leonardo is lossy. Rickie is cerise. All cerise things are genetic. Round things are cerise. Round, pedigreed things are cerise. Rough things are cerise. If Leonardo is pedigreed and Leonardo is pyknotic then Leonardo is causative. If Leonardo is causative then Leonardo is lossy. Furry things are lossy. All pedigreed, causative things are genetic. Leonardo is not pedigreed.", "logic": "\nPedigreed(leonardo)\nLossy(leonardo)\nCerise(rickie)\nforall x (Cerise(x) -> Genetic(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Lossy(x) -> Cerise(x))\nPedigreed(leonardo) and Pyknotic(leonardo) -> Causative(leonardo)\nCausative(leonardo) -> Lossy(leonardo)\nforall x (Genetic(x) -> Lossy(x))\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) and Causative(x) -> Genetic(x))\n\nnot Pedigreed(leonardo)\n\ntherefore Pedigreed(leonardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Rosanne is defiant. Rosanne is graceless. Sargent is protecting. All protecting things are monogenic. Round things are protecting. Round, defiant things are protecting. Rough things are protecting. If Rosanne is defiant and Rosanne is antebellum then Rosanne is tubelike. If Rosanne is tubelike then Rosanne is graceless. Furry things are graceless. All defiant, tubelike things are monogenic. Rosanne is protecting.", "logic": "\nDefiant(rosanne)\nGraceless(rosanne)\nProtecting(sargent)\nforall x (Protecting(x) -> Monogenic(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) -> Protecting(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) and Defiant(x) -> Protecting(x))\nforall x (Graceless(x) -> Protecting(x))\nDefiant(rosanne) and Antebellum(rosanne) -> Tubelike(rosanne)\nTubelike(rosanne) -> Graceless(rosanne)\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> Graceless(x))\nforall x (Defiant(x) and Tubelike(x) -> Monogenic(x))\n\nProtecting(rosanne)\n\nGraceless(rosanne) and forall x (Graceless(x) -> Protecting(x)) -> therefore Protecting(rosanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Esmerelda is cleared. Esmerelda is exportable. Violette is chartered. All chartered things are euclidian. Round things are chartered. Round, cleared things are chartered. Rough things are chartered. If Esmerelda is cleared and Esmerelda is sylphlike then Esmerelda is uniformed. If Esmerelda is uniformed then Esmerelda is exportable. Furry things are exportable. All cleared, uniformed things are euclidian. Violette is not euclidian.", "logic": "\nCleared(esmerelda)\nExportable(esmerelda)\nChartered(violette)\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Euclidian(x))\nforall x (Uniformed(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Uniformed(x) and Cleared(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) -> Chartered(x))\nCleared(esmerelda) and Sylphlike(esmerelda) -> Uniformed(esmerelda)\nUniformed(esmerelda) -> Exportable(esmerelda)\nforall x (Euclidian(x) -> Exportable(x))\nforall x (Cleared(x) and Uniformed(x) -> Euclidian(x))\n\nnot Euclidian(violette)\n\nChartered(violette) and forall x (Chartered(x) -> Euclidian(x)) -> therefore Euclidian(violette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Sydney is broadband. Sydney is translunar. Emmit is nightly. All nightly things are aglow. Round things are nightly. Round, broadband things are nightly. Rough things are nightly. If Sydney is broadband and Sydney is lathery then Sydney is windup. If Sydney is windup then Sydney is translunar. Furry things are translunar. All broadband, windup things are aglow. Emmit is translunar.", "logic": "\nBroadband(sydney)\nTranslunar(sydney)\nNightly(emmit)\nforall x (Nightly(x) -> Aglow(x))\nforall x (Windup(x) -> Nightly(x))\nforall x (Windup(x) and Broadband(x) -> Nightly(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) -> Nightly(x))\nBroadband(sydney) and Lathery(sydney) -> Windup(sydney)\nWindup(sydney) -> Translunar(sydney)\nforall x (Aglow(x) -> Translunar(x))\nforall x (Broadband(x) and Windup(x) -> Aglow(x))\n\nTranslunar(emmit)\n\nNightly(emmit) and forall x (Nightly(x) -> Aglow(x)) -> therefore Aglow(emmit) Aglow(emmit) and forall x (Aglow(x) -> Translunar(x)) -> therefore Translunar(emmit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Celeste is overgrown. Celeste is misguided. Ania is goateed. All goateed things are probable. Round things are goateed. Round, overgrown things are goateed. Rough things are goateed. If Celeste is overgrown and Celeste is encouraged then Celeste is nineteen. If Celeste is nineteen then Celeste is misguided. Furry things are misguided. All overgrown, nineteen things are probable. Ania is not misguided.", "logic": "\nOvergrown(celeste)\nMisguided(celeste)\nGoateed(ania)\nforall x (Goateed(x) -> Probable(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) -> Goateed(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Goateed(x))\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Goateed(x))\nOvergrown(celeste) and Encouraged(celeste) -> Nineteen(celeste)\nNineteen(celeste) -> Misguided(celeste)\nforall x (Probable(x) -> Misguided(x))\nforall x (Overgrown(x) and Nineteen(x) -> Probable(x))\n\nnot Misguided(ania)\n\nGoateed(ania) and forall x (Goateed(x) -> Probable(x)) -> therefore Probable(ania) Probable(ania) and forall x (Probable(x) -> Misguided(x)) -> therefore Misguided(ania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Berenice is invaluable. Berenice is papillose. Gladys is inhibited. All inhibited things are highflying. Round things are inhibited. Round, invaluable things are inhibited. Rough things are inhibited. If Berenice is invaluable and Berenice is refractive then Berenice is writhen. If Berenice is writhen then Berenice is papillose. Furry things are papillose. All invaluable, writhen things are highflying. Berenice is not writhen.", "logic": "\nInvaluable(berenice)\nPapillose(berenice)\nInhibited(gladys)\nforall x (Inhibited(x) -> Highflying(x))\nforall x (Writhen(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Writhen(x) and Invaluable(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nInvaluable(berenice) and Refractive(berenice) -> Writhen(berenice)\nWrithen(berenice) -> Papillose(berenice)\nforall x (Highflying(x) -> Papillose(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) and Writhen(x) -> Highflying(x))\n\nnot Writhen(berenice)\n\nInvaluable(berenice) and Refractive(berenice) -> Writhen(berenice) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Lisbeth is ctenoid. Lisbeth is nullified. Rufus is ripping. All ripping things are homoerotic. Round things are ripping. Round, ctenoid things are ripping. Rough things are ripping. If Lisbeth is ctenoid and Lisbeth is conelike then Lisbeth is eellike. If Lisbeth is eellike then Lisbeth is nullified. Furry things are nullified. All ctenoid, eellike things are homoerotic. Rufus is conelike.", "logic": "\nCtenoid(lisbeth)\nNullified(lisbeth)\nRipping(rufus)\nforall x (Ripping(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Eellike(x) -> Ripping(x))\nforall x (Eellike(x) and Ctenoid(x) -> Ripping(x))\nforall x (Nullified(x) -> Ripping(x))\nCtenoid(lisbeth) and Conelike(lisbeth) -> Eellike(lisbeth)\nEellike(lisbeth) -> Nullified(lisbeth)\nforall x (Homoerotic(x) -> Nullified(x))\nforall x (Ctenoid(x) and Eellike(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\n\nConelike(rufus)\n\nConelike(rufus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Genovera is saving. Genovera is astrocytic. Arleta is inverted. All inverted things are unknowing. Round things are inverted. Round, saving things are inverted. Rough things are inverted. If Genovera is saving and Genovera is crackle then Genovera is owlish. If Genovera is owlish then Genovera is astrocytic. Furry things are astrocytic. All saving, owlish things are unknowing. Genovera is not big.", "logic": "\nSaving(genovera)\nAstrocytic(genovera)\nInverted(arleta)\nforall x (Inverted(x) -> Unknowing(x))\nforall x (Owlish(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Owlish(x) and Saving(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Astrocytic(x) -> Inverted(x))\nSaving(genovera) and Crackle(genovera) -> Owlish(genovera)\nOwlish(genovera) -> Astrocytic(genovera)\nforall x (Unknowing(x) -> Astrocytic(x))\nforall x (Saving(x) and Owlish(x) -> Unknowing(x))\n\nnot Big(genovera)\n\nnot Big(genovera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Jordain is airless. Jordain is spirant. Sidney is perennial. All perennial things are dandyish. Round things are perennial. Round, airless things are perennial. Rough things are perennial. If Jordain is airless and Jordain is subhuman then Jordain is precedent. If Jordain is precedent then Jordain is spirant. Furry things are spirant. All airless, precedent things are dandyish. Sidney is precedent.", "logic": "\nAirless(jordain)\nSpirant(jordain)\nPerennial(sidney)\nforall x (Perennial(x) -> Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Precedent(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Precedent(x) and Airless(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Spirant(x) -> Perennial(x))\nAirless(jordain) and Subhuman(jordain) -> Precedent(jordain)\nPrecedent(jordain) -> Spirant(jordain)\nforall x (Dandyish(x) -> Spirant(x))\nforall x (Airless(x) and Precedent(x) -> Dandyish(x))\n\nPrecedent(sidney)\n\nPrecedent(sidney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Olivier is palpable. Olivier is delusive. Jessamyn is entranced. All entranced things are naif. Round things are entranced. Round, palpable things are entranced. Rough things are entranced. If Olivier is palpable and Olivier is impassable then Olivier is hepatic. If Olivier is hepatic then Olivier is delusive. Furry things are delusive. All palpable, hepatic things are naif. Jessamyn is not big.", "logic": "\nPalpable(olivier)\nDelusive(olivier)\nEntranced(jessamyn)\nforall x (Entranced(x) -> Naif(x))\nforall x (Hepatic(x) -> Entranced(x))\nforall x (Hepatic(x) and Palpable(x) -> Entranced(x))\nforall x (Delusive(x) -> Entranced(x))\nPalpable(olivier) and Impassable(olivier) -> Hepatic(olivier)\nHepatic(olivier) -> Delusive(olivier)\nforall x (Naif(x) -> Delusive(x))\nforall x (Palpable(x) and Hepatic(x) -> Naif(x))\n\nnot Big(jessamyn)\n\nnot Big(jessamyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Grant is uncrowded. Grant is ebon. Shumeet is avellan. All avellan things are malposed. Round things are avellan. Round, uncrowded things are avellan. Rough things are avellan. If Grant is uncrowded and Grant is incurious then Grant is ventricose. If Grant is ventricose then Grant is ebon. Furry things are ebon. All uncrowded, ventricose things are malposed. Grant is incurious.", "logic": "\nUncrowded(grant)\nEbon(grant)\nAvellan(shumeet)\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Malposed(x))\nforall x (Ventricose(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Ventricose(x) and Uncrowded(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Ebon(x) -> Avellan(x))\nUncrowded(grant) and Incurious(grant) -> Ventricose(grant)\nVentricose(grant) -> Ebon(grant)\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> Ebon(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) and Ventricose(x) -> Malposed(x))\n\nIncurious(grant)\n\nIncurious(grant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-830"} {"premises": "Perl is not cambrian. Perl is slouchy. Perl is clubbable. Perl is crisscross. Freeman is integrated. Freeman is not slouchy. Freeman is anodic. Gina is not cambrian. Gina is not slouchy. Gina is clubbable. Gina is anodic. Gina is herculean. Blue people are not cambrian. If someone is anodic and cambrian then they are herculean. If someone is clubbable then they are integrated. If Perl is cambrian then Perl is not clubbable. All anodic, integrated people are not crisscross. If Freeman is crisscross and Freeman is clubbable then Freeman is not integrated. If Gina is crisscross and Gina is integrated then Gina is herculean. If Freeman is not integrated then Freeman is herculean. Perl is crisscross.", "logic": "\nnot Cambrian(perl)\nSlouchy(perl)\nClubbable(perl)\nCrisscross(perl)\nIntegrated(freeman)\nnot Slouchy(freeman)\nAnodic(freeman)\nnot Cambrian(gina)\nnot Slouchy(gina)\nClubbable(gina)\nAnodic(gina)\nHerculean(gina)\nforall x (Integrated(x) -> not Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Anodic(x) and Cambrian(x) -> Herculean(x))\nforall x (Clubbable(x) -> Integrated(x))\nCambrian(perl) -> not Clubbable(perl)\nforall x (Anodic(x) and Integrated(x) -> not Crisscross(x))\nCrisscross(freeman) and Clubbable(freeman) -> not Integrated(freeman)\nCrisscross(gina) and Integrated(gina) -> Herculean(gina)\nnot Integrated(freeman) -> Herculean(freeman)\n\nCrisscross(perl)\n\ntherefore Crisscross(perl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Noam is not dictated. Noam is tertiary. Noam is trillionth. Noam is mythical. Charlott is wrong. Charlott is not tertiary. Charlott is zygomatic. Clarie is not dictated. Clarie is not tertiary. Clarie is trillionth. Clarie is zygomatic. Clarie is metabolous. Blue people are not dictated. If someone is zygomatic and dictated then they are metabolous. If someone is trillionth then they are wrong. If Noam is dictated then Noam is not trillionth. All zygomatic, wrong people are not mythical. If Charlott is mythical and Charlott is trillionth then Charlott is not wrong. If Clarie is mythical and Clarie is wrong then Clarie is metabolous. If Charlott is not wrong then Charlott is metabolous. Noam is not tertiary.", "logic": "\nnot Dictated(noam)\nTertiary(noam)\nTrillionth(noam)\nMythical(noam)\nWrong(charlott)\nnot Tertiary(charlott)\nZygomatic(charlott)\nnot Dictated(clarie)\nnot Tertiary(clarie)\nTrillionth(clarie)\nZygomatic(clarie)\nMetabolous(clarie)\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> not Dictated(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and Dictated(x) -> Metabolous(x))\nforall x (Trillionth(x) -> Wrong(x))\nDictated(noam) -> not Trillionth(noam)\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and Wrong(x) -> not Mythical(x))\nMythical(charlott) and Trillionth(charlott) -> not Wrong(charlott)\nMythical(clarie) and Wrong(clarie) -> Metabolous(clarie)\nnot Wrong(charlott) -> Metabolous(charlott)\n\nnot Tertiary(noam)\n\ntherefore Tertiary(noam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Annabela is not dissoluble. Annabela is inerrant. Annabela is struck. Annabela is flawless. Nata is attractive. Nata is not inerrant. Nata is diabolical. Anselm is not dissoluble. Anselm is not inerrant. Anselm is struck. Anselm is diabolical. Anselm is alto. Blue people are not dissoluble. If someone is diabolical and dissoluble then they are alto. If someone is struck then they are attractive. If Annabela is dissoluble then Annabela is not struck. All diabolical, attractive people are not flawless. If Nata is flawless and Nata is struck then Nata is not attractive. If Anselm is flawless and Anselm is attractive then Anselm is alto. If Nata is not attractive then Nata is alto. Nata is not dissoluble.", "logic": "\nnot Dissoluble(annabela)\nInerrant(annabela)\nStruck(annabela)\nFlawless(annabela)\nAttractive(nata)\nnot Inerrant(nata)\nDiabolical(nata)\nnot Dissoluble(anselm)\nnot Inerrant(anselm)\nStruck(anselm)\nDiabolical(anselm)\nAlto(anselm)\nforall x (Attractive(x) -> not Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Diabolical(x) and Dissoluble(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Struck(x) -> Attractive(x))\nDissoluble(annabela) -> not Struck(annabela)\nforall x (Diabolical(x) and Attractive(x) -> not Flawless(x))\nFlawless(nata) and Struck(nata) -> not Attractive(nata)\nFlawless(anselm) and Attractive(anselm) -> Alto(anselm)\nnot Attractive(nata) -> Alto(nata)\n\nnot Dissoluble(nata)\n\nAttractive(nata) and forall x (Attractive(x) -> not Dissoluble(x)) -> therefore not Dissoluble(nata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Karil is not pilose. Karil is medullated. Karil is deluxe. Karil is telling. Matti is indistinct. Matti is not medullated. Matti is inverted. Bobbie is not pilose. Bobbie is not medullated. Bobbie is deluxe. Bobbie is inverted. Bobbie is polygenic. Blue people are not pilose. If someone is inverted and pilose then they are polygenic. If someone is deluxe then they are indistinct. If Karil is pilose then Karil is not deluxe. All inverted, indistinct people are not telling. If Matti is telling and Matti is deluxe then Matti is not indistinct. If Bobbie is telling and Bobbie is indistinct then Bobbie is polygenic. If Matti is not indistinct then Matti is polygenic. Matti is pilose.", "logic": "\nnot Pilose(karil)\nMedullated(karil)\nDeluxe(karil)\nTelling(karil)\nIndistinct(matti)\nnot Medullated(matti)\nInverted(matti)\nnot Pilose(bobbie)\nnot Medullated(bobbie)\nDeluxe(bobbie)\nInverted(bobbie)\nPolygenic(bobbie)\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> not Pilose(x))\nforall x (Inverted(x) and Pilose(x) -> Polygenic(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nPilose(karil) -> not Deluxe(karil)\nforall x (Inverted(x) and Indistinct(x) -> not Telling(x))\nTelling(matti) and Deluxe(matti) -> not Indistinct(matti)\nTelling(bobbie) and Indistinct(bobbie) -> Polygenic(bobbie)\nnot Indistinct(matti) -> Polygenic(matti)\n\nPilose(matti)\n\nIndistinct(matti) and forall x (Indistinct(x) -> not Pilose(x)) -> therefore not Pilose(matti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Luelle is not foetal. Luelle is decurved. Luelle is anestrous. Luelle is scalene. Chery is ripping. Chery is not decurved. Chery is auditory. Leeann is not foetal. Leeann is not decurved. Leeann is anestrous. Leeann is auditory. Leeann is lemonlike. Blue people are not foetal. If someone is auditory and foetal then they are lemonlike. If someone is anestrous then they are ripping. If Luelle is foetal then Luelle is not anestrous. All auditory, ripping people are not scalene. If Chery is scalene and Chery is anestrous then Chery is not ripping. If Leeann is scalene and Leeann is ripping then Leeann is lemonlike. If Chery is not ripping then Chery is lemonlike. Leeann is not scalene.", "logic": "\nnot Foetal(luelle)\nDecurved(luelle)\nAnestrous(luelle)\nScalene(luelle)\nRipping(chery)\nnot Decurved(chery)\nAuditory(chery)\nnot Foetal(leeann)\nnot Decurved(leeann)\nAnestrous(leeann)\nAuditory(leeann)\nLemonlike(leeann)\nforall x (Ripping(x) -> not Foetal(x))\nforall x (Auditory(x) and Foetal(x) -> Lemonlike(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> Ripping(x))\nFoetal(luelle) -> not Anestrous(luelle)\nforall x (Auditory(x) and Ripping(x) -> not Scalene(x))\nScalene(chery) and Anestrous(chery) -> not Ripping(chery)\nScalene(leeann) and Ripping(leeann) -> Lemonlike(leeann)\nnot Ripping(chery) -> Lemonlike(chery)\n\nnot Scalene(leeann)\n\nAnestrous(leeann) and forall x (Anestrous(x) -> Ripping(x)) -> therefore Ripping(leeann) Auditory(leeann) and Ripping(leeann) and forall x (Auditory(x) and Ripping(x) -> not Scalene(x)) -> therefore not Scalene(leeann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Sammy is not effulgent. Sammy is monetary. Sammy is breakneck. Sammy is unary. Kalli is convincing. Kalli is not monetary. Kalli is butcherly. Brandie is not effulgent. Brandie is not monetary. Brandie is breakneck. Brandie is butcherly. Brandie is snakelike. Blue people are not effulgent. If someone is butcherly and effulgent then they are snakelike. If someone is breakneck then they are convincing. If Sammy is effulgent then Sammy is not breakneck. All butcherly, convincing people are not unary. If Kalli is unary and Kalli is breakneck then Kalli is not convincing. If Brandie is unary and Brandie is convincing then Brandie is snakelike. If Kalli is not convincing then Kalli is snakelike. Brandie is unary.", "logic": "\nnot Effulgent(sammy)\nMonetary(sammy)\nBreakneck(sammy)\nUnary(sammy)\nConvincing(kalli)\nnot Monetary(kalli)\nButcherly(kalli)\nnot Effulgent(brandie)\nnot Monetary(brandie)\nBreakneck(brandie)\nButcherly(brandie)\nSnakelike(brandie)\nforall x (Convincing(x) -> not Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) and Effulgent(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nforall x (Breakneck(x) -> Convincing(x))\nEffulgent(sammy) -> not Breakneck(sammy)\nforall x (Butcherly(x) and Convincing(x) -> not Unary(x))\nUnary(kalli) and Breakneck(kalli) -> not Convincing(kalli)\nUnary(brandie) and Convincing(brandie) -> Snakelike(brandie)\nnot Convincing(kalli) -> Snakelike(kalli)\n\nUnary(brandie)\n\nBreakneck(brandie) and forall x (Breakneck(x) -> Convincing(x)) -> therefore Convincing(brandie) Butcherly(brandie) and Convincing(brandie) and forall x (Butcherly(x) and Convincing(x) -> not Unary(x)) -> therefore not Unary(brandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Calli is not quenchless. Calli is cryptic. Calli is afloat. Calli is arch. Natalie is sapphire. Natalie is not cryptic. Natalie is omissible. Kalli is not quenchless. Kalli is not cryptic. Kalli is afloat. Kalli is omissible. Kalli is rodlike. Blue people are not quenchless. If someone is omissible and quenchless then they are rodlike. If someone is afloat then they are sapphire. If Calli is quenchless then Calli is not afloat. All omissible, sapphire people are not arch. If Natalie is arch and Natalie is afloat then Natalie is not sapphire. If Kalli is arch and Kalli is sapphire then Kalli is rodlike. If Natalie is not sapphire then Natalie is rodlike. Calli is not rodlike.", "logic": "\nnot Quenchless(calli)\nCryptic(calli)\nAfloat(calli)\nArch(calli)\nSapphire(natalie)\nnot Cryptic(natalie)\nOmissible(natalie)\nnot Quenchless(kalli)\nnot Cryptic(kalli)\nAfloat(kalli)\nOmissible(kalli)\nRodlike(kalli)\nforall x (Sapphire(x) -> not Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Omissible(x) and Quenchless(x) -> Rodlike(x))\nforall x (Afloat(x) -> Sapphire(x))\nQuenchless(calli) -> not Afloat(calli)\nforall x (Omissible(x) and Sapphire(x) -> not Arch(x))\nArch(natalie) and Afloat(natalie) -> not Sapphire(natalie)\nArch(kalli) and Sapphire(kalli) -> Rodlike(kalli)\nnot Sapphire(natalie) -> Rodlike(natalie)\n\nnot Rodlike(calli)\n\nforall x (Omissible(x) and Quenchless(x) -> Rodlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Hansel is not unlikely. Hansel is jamaican. Hansel is benzenoid. Hansel is patronymic. Loella is lipotropic. Loella is not jamaican. Loella is galvanic. Zechariah is not unlikely. Zechariah is not jamaican. Zechariah is benzenoid. Zechariah is galvanic. Zechariah is aluminous. Blue people are not unlikely. If someone is galvanic and unlikely then they are aluminous. If someone is benzenoid then they are lipotropic. If Hansel is unlikely then Hansel is not benzenoid. All galvanic, lipotropic people are not patronymic. If Loella is patronymic and Loella is benzenoid then Loella is not lipotropic. If Zechariah is patronymic and Zechariah is lipotropic then Zechariah is aluminous. If Loella is not lipotropic then Loella is aluminous. Loella is aluminous.", "logic": "\nnot Unlikely(hansel)\nJamaican(hansel)\nBenzenoid(hansel)\nPatronymic(hansel)\nLipotropic(loella)\nnot Jamaican(loella)\nGalvanic(loella)\nnot Unlikely(zechariah)\nnot Jamaican(zechariah)\nBenzenoid(zechariah)\nGalvanic(zechariah)\nAluminous(zechariah)\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) -> not Unlikely(x))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Aluminous(x))\nforall x (Benzenoid(x) -> Lipotropic(x))\nUnlikely(hansel) -> not Benzenoid(hansel)\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Lipotropic(x) -> not Patronymic(x))\nPatronymic(loella) and Benzenoid(loella) -> not Lipotropic(loella)\nPatronymic(zechariah) and Lipotropic(zechariah) -> Aluminous(zechariah)\nnot Lipotropic(loella) -> Aluminous(loella)\n\nAluminous(loella)\n\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Aluminous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Ciara is not undyed. Ciara is clxxx. Ciara is searching. Ciara is hemophilic. Kirstyn is vicenary. Kirstyn is not clxxx. Kirstyn is solved. Evangelia is not undyed. Evangelia is not clxxx. Evangelia is searching. Evangelia is solved. Evangelia is rhomboidal. Blue people are not undyed. If someone is solved and undyed then they are rhomboidal. If someone is searching then they are vicenary. If Ciara is undyed then Ciara is not searching. All solved, vicenary people are not hemophilic. If Kirstyn is hemophilic and Kirstyn is searching then Kirstyn is not vicenary. If Evangelia is hemophilic and Evangelia is vicenary then Evangelia is rhomboidal. If Kirstyn is not vicenary then Kirstyn is rhomboidal. Ciara is not solved.", "logic": "\nnot Undyed(ciara)\nClxxx(ciara)\nSearching(ciara)\nHemophilic(ciara)\nVicenary(kirstyn)\nnot Clxxx(kirstyn)\nSolved(kirstyn)\nnot Undyed(evangelia)\nnot Clxxx(evangelia)\nSearching(evangelia)\nSolved(evangelia)\nRhomboidal(evangelia)\nforall x (Vicenary(x) -> not Undyed(x))\nforall x (Solved(x) and Undyed(x) -> Rhomboidal(x))\nforall x (Searching(x) -> Vicenary(x))\nUndyed(ciara) -> not Searching(ciara)\nforall x (Solved(x) and Vicenary(x) -> not Hemophilic(x))\nHemophilic(kirstyn) and Searching(kirstyn) -> not Vicenary(kirstyn)\nHemophilic(evangelia) and Vicenary(evangelia) -> Rhomboidal(evangelia)\nnot Vicenary(kirstyn) -> Rhomboidal(kirstyn)\n\nnot Solved(ciara)\n\nnot Solved(ciara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Therine is not angelical. Therine is barricaded. Therine is hypoactive. Therine is frigid. Calida is comose. Calida is not barricaded. Calida is lovelorn. Archibold is not angelical. Archibold is not barricaded. Archibold is hypoactive. Archibold is lovelorn. Archibold is paradisal. Blue people are not angelical. If someone is lovelorn and angelical then they are paradisal. If someone is hypoactive then they are comose. If Therine is angelical then Therine is not hypoactive. All lovelorn, comose people are not frigid. If Calida is frigid and Calida is hypoactive then Calida is not comose. If Archibold is frigid and Archibold is comose then Archibold is paradisal. If Calida is not comose then Calida is paradisal. Calida is hypoactive.", "logic": "\nnot Angelical(therine)\nBarricaded(therine)\nHypoactive(therine)\nFrigid(therine)\nComose(calida)\nnot Barricaded(calida)\nLovelorn(calida)\nnot Angelical(archibold)\nnot Barricaded(archibold)\nHypoactive(archibold)\nLovelorn(archibold)\nParadisal(archibold)\nforall x (Comose(x) -> not Angelical(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Angelical(x) -> Paradisal(x))\nforall x (Hypoactive(x) -> Comose(x))\nAngelical(therine) -> not Hypoactive(therine)\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Comose(x) -> not Frigid(x))\nFrigid(calida) and Hypoactive(calida) -> not Comose(calida)\nFrigid(archibold) and Comose(archibold) -> Paradisal(archibold)\nnot Comose(calida) -> Paradisal(calida)\n\nHypoactive(calida)\n\nHypoactive(calida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1042"} {"premises": "Augie is protrusive. Augie is stative. Augie is churlish. Augie is lapsed. Debby is not calculated. Debby is skilful. Debby is stative. Debby is churlish. Chelsea is not poetical. Cassey is churlish. All calculated things are skilful. If Debby is protrusive and Debby is calculated then Debby is lapsed. All lapsed things are calculated. Cassey is churlish.", "logic": "\nProtrusive(augie)\nStative(augie)\nChurlish(augie)\nLapsed(augie)\nnot Calculated(debby)\nSkilful(debby)\nStative(debby)\nChurlish(debby)\nnot Poetical(chelsea)\nChurlish(cassey)\nforall x (Calculated(x) -> Skilful(x))\nProtrusive(debby) and Calculated(debby) -> Lapsed(debby)\nforall x (Lapsed(x) -> Calculated(x))\n\nChurlish(cassey)\n\ntherefore Churlish(cassey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Glory is played. Glory is trancelike. Glory is felted. Glory is miasmal. Lorianna is not omnivorous. Lorianna is brimming. Lorianna is trancelike. Lorianna is felted. Madelon is not patronized. Eben is felted. All omnivorous things are brimming. If Lorianna is played and Lorianna is omnivorous then Lorianna is miasmal. All miasmal things are omnivorous. Glory is not miasmal.", "logic": "\nPlayed(glory)\nTrancelike(glory)\nFelted(glory)\nMiasmal(glory)\nnot Omnivorous(lorianna)\nBrimming(lorianna)\nTrancelike(lorianna)\nFelted(lorianna)\nnot Patronized(madelon)\nFelted(eben)\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) -> Brimming(x))\nPlayed(lorianna) and Omnivorous(lorianna) -> Miasmal(lorianna)\nforall x (Miasmal(x) -> Omnivorous(x))\n\nnot Miasmal(glory)\n\ntherefore Miasmal(glory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Mick is recorded. Mick is flaring. Mick is empirical. Mick is maxi. Gerti is not stovepiped. Gerti is valuable. Gerti is flaring. Gerti is empirical. Shir is not unflawed. Amanda is empirical. All stovepiped things are valuable. If Gerti is recorded and Gerti is stovepiped then Gerti is maxi. All maxi things are stovepiped. Mick is stovepiped.", "logic": "\nRecorded(mick)\nFlaring(mick)\nEmpirical(mick)\nMaxi(mick)\nnot Stovepiped(gerti)\nValuable(gerti)\nFlaring(gerti)\nEmpirical(gerti)\nnot Unflawed(shir)\nEmpirical(amanda)\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Valuable(x))\nRecorded(gerti) and Stovepiped(gerti) -> Maxi(gerti)\nforall x (Maxi(x) -> Stovepiped(x))\n\nStovepiped(mick)\n\nMaxi(mick) and forall x (Maxi(x) -> Stovepiped(x)) -> therefore Stovepiped(mick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Genna is enkindled. Genna is final. Genna is isosceles. Genna is chaetal. Andreas is not bereft. Andreas is retro. Andreas is final. Andreas is isosceles. Knox is not botswanan. Colette is isosceles. All bereft things are retro. If Andreas is enkindled and Andreas is bereft then Andreas is chaetal. All chaetal things are bereft. Genna is not bereft.", "logic": "\nEnkindled(genna)\nFinal(genna)\nIsosceles(genna)\nChaetal(genna)\nnot Bereft(andreas)\nRetro(andreas)\nFinal(andreas)\nIsosceles(andreas)\nnot Botswanan(knox)\nIsosceles(colette)\nforall x (Bereft(x) -> Retro(x))\nEnkindled(andreas) and Bereft(andreas) -> Chaetal(andreas)\nforall x (Chaetal(x) -> Bereft(x))\n\nnot Bereft(genna)\n\nChaetal(genna) and forall x (Chaetal(x) -> Bereft(x)) -> therefore Bereft(genna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Layla is washy. Layla is calibrated. Layla is resolved. Layla is toothsome. Flor is not sage. Flor is scabrous. Flor is calibrated. Flor is resolved. Shep is not heedless. Tisha is resolved. All sage things are scabrous. If Flor is washy and Flor is sage then Flor is toothsome. All toothsome things are sage. Layla is scabrous.", "logic": "\nWashy(layla)\nCalibrated(layla)\nResolved(layla)\nToothsome(layla)\nnot Sage(flor)\nScabrous(flor)\nCalibrated(flor)\nResolved(flor)\nnot Heedless(shep)\nResolved(tisha)\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nWashy(flor) and Sage(flor) -> Toothsome(flor)\nforall x (Toothsome(x) -> Sage(x))\n\nScabrous(layla)\n\nToothsome(layla) and forall x (Toothsome(x) -> Sage(x)) -> therefore Sage(layla) Sage(layla) and forall x (Sage(x) -> Scabrous(x)) -> therefore Scabrous(layla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Nisse is mitral. Nisse is dormant. Nisse is yogic. Nisse is anxiolytic. Stormy is not shakedown. Stormy is autumnal. Stormy is dormant. Stormy is yogic. Merrili is not arsenious. Jarrett is yogic. All shakedown things are autumnal. If Stormy is mitral and Stormy is shakedown then Stormy is anxiolytic. All anxiolytic things are shakedown. Nisse is not autumnal.", "logic": "\nMitral(nisse)\nDormant(nisse)\nYogic(nisse)\nAnxiolytic(nisse)\nnot Shakedown(stormy)\nAutumnal(stormy)\nDormant(stormy)\nYogic(stormy)\nnot Arsenious(merrili)\nYogic(jarrett)\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nMitral(stormy) and Shakedown(stormy) -> Anxiolytic(stormy)\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Shakedown(x))\n\nnot Autumnal(nisse)\n\nAnxiolytic(nisse) and forall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Shakedown(x)) -> therefore Shakedown(nisse) Shakedown(nisse) and forall x (Shakedown(x) -> Autumnal(x)) -> therefore Autumnal(nisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Franni is nigerien. Franni is cohesive. Franni is nasty. Franni is connective. Arvind is not barytic. Arvind is hideous. Arvind is cohesive. Arvind is nasty. Latashia is not foliated. Marcela is nasty. All barytic things are hideous. If Arvind is nigerien and Arvind is barytic then Arvind is connective. All connective things are barytic. Marcela is not barytic.", "logic": "\nNigerien(franni)\nCohesive(franni)\nNasty(franni)\nConnective(franni)\nnot Barytic(arvind)\nHideous(arvind)\nCohesive(arvind)\nNasty(arvind)\nnot Foliated(latashia)\nNasty(marcela)\nforall x (Barytic(x) -> Hideous(x))\nNigerien(arvind) and Barytic(arvind) -> Connective(arvind)\nforall x (Connective(x) -> Barytic(x))\n\nnot Barytic(marcela)\n\nforall x (Connective(x) -> Barytic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Teresa is succinct. Teresa is tottering. Teresa is ribbony. Teresa is flavorsome. Bea is not spatial. Bea is larger. Bea is tottering. Bea is ribbony. Iolanthe is not select. Norene is ribbony. All spatial things are larger. If Bea is succinct and Bea is spatial then Bea is flavorsome. All flavorsome things are spatial. Bea is flavorsome.", "logic": "\nSuccinct(teresa)\nTottering(teresa)\nRibbony(teresa)\nFlavorsome(teresa)\nnot Spatial(bea)\nLarger(bea)\nTottering(bea)\nRibbony(bea)\nnot Select(iolanthe)\nRibbony(norene)\nforall x (Spatial(x) -> Larger(x))\nSuccinct(bea) and Spatial(bea) -> Flavorsome(bea)\nforall x (Flavorsome(x) -> Spatial(x))\n\nFlavorsome(bea)\n\nSuccinct(bea) and Spatial(bea) -> Flavorsome(bea) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Mason is marvellous. Mason is temperate. Mason is fifth. Mason is antisocial. Carson is not mucosal. Carson is meandering. Carson is temperate. Carson is fifth. Carlie is not feudatory. Anica is fifth. All mucosal things are meandering. If Carson is marvellous and Carson is mucosal then Carson is antisocial. All antisocial things are mucosal. Anica is not meandering.", "logic": "\nMarvellous(mason)\nTemperate(mason)\nFifth(mason)\nAntisocial(mason)\nnot Mucosal(carson)\nMeandering(carson)\nTemperate(carson)\nFifth(carson)\nnot Feudatory(carlie)\nFifth(anica)\nforall x (Mucosal(x) -> Meandering(x))\nMarvellous(carson) and Mucosal(carson) -> Antisocial(carson)\nforall x (Antisocial(x) -> Mucosal(x))\n\nnot Meandering(anica)\n\nforall x (Mucosal(x) -> Meandering(x)) <- forall x (Antisocial(x) -> Mucosal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Cornelius is infuriated. Cornelius is nearby. Cornelius is sizzling. Cornelius is vertebral. Luise is not paraguayan. Luise is secondhand. Luise is nearby. Luise is sizzling. Laraine is not elective. Dian is sizzling. All paraguayan things are secondhand. If Luise is infuriated and Luise is paraguayan then Luise is vertebral. All vertebral things are paraguayan. Dian is elective.", "logic": "\nInfuriated(cornelius)\nNearby(cornelius)\nSizzling(cornelius)\nVertebral(cornelius)\nnot Paraguayan(luise)\nSecondhand(luise)\nNearby(luise)\nSizzling(luise)\nnot Elective(laraine)\nSizzling(dian)\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) -> Secondhand(x))\nInfuriated(luise) and Paraguayan(luise) -> Vertebral(luise)\nforall x (Vertebral(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\n\nElective(dian)\n\nElective(dian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Rodney is excitative. Rodney is echolike. Rodney is contracted. Rodney is canary. Monty is not dipolar. Monty is spinnbar. Monty is echolike. Monty is contracted. Jeffrey is not marsupial. Aron is contracted. All dipolar things are spinnbar. If Monty is excitative and Monty is dipolar then Monty is canary. All canary things are dipolar. Jeffrey is not excitative.", "logic": "\nExcitative(rodney)\nEcholike(rodney)\nContracted(rodney)\nCanary(rodney)\nnot Dipolar(monty)\nSpinnbar(monty)\nEcholike(monty)\nContracted(monty)\nnot Marsupial(jeffrey)\nContracted(aron)\nforall x (Dipolar(x) -> Spinnbar(x))\nExcitative(monty) and Dipolar(monty) -> Canary(monty)\nforall x (Canary(x) -> Dipolar(x))\n\nnot Excitative(jeffrey)\n\nnot Excitative(jeffrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Grove is plumbic. Grove is voluptuous. Grove is awestruck. Grove is beetling. Nonnah is not vermicular. Nonnah is unsociable. Nonnah is voluptuous. Nonnah is awestruck. Loraine is not deliberate. Inglebert is awestruck. All vermicular things are unsociable. If Nonnah is plumbic and Nonnah is vermicular then Nonnah is beetling. All beetling things are vermicular. Nonnah is plumbic.", "logic": "\nPlumbic(grove)\nVoluptuous(grove)\nAwestruck(grove)\nBeetling(grove)\nnot Vermicular(nonnah)\nUnsociable(nonnah)\nVoluptuous(nonnah)\nAwestruck(nonnah)\nnot Deliberate(loraine)\nAwestruck(inglebert)\nforall x (Vermicular(x) -> Unsociable(x))\nPlumbic(nonnah) and Vermicular(nonnah) -> Beetling(nonnah)\nforall x (Beetling(x) -> Vermicular(x))\n\nPlumbic(nonnah)\n\nPlumbic(nonnah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Keenan is rousseauan. Keenan is not quelled. Keenan is pesky. Keenan is solid. Keenan is dire. Keenan is not spiffing. Keenan is outboard. Dix is rousseauan. Dix is quelled. Dix is not dire. Dix is spiffing. Dix is not outboard. Davey is quelled. Davey is pesky. Davey is dire. Green things are spiffing. If something is pesky and not dire then it is spiffing. If Davey is spiffing and Davey is quelled then Davey is rousseauan. Keenan is rousseauan.", "logic": "\nRousseauan(keenan)\nnot Quelled(keenan)\nPesky(keenan)\nSolid(keenan)\nDire(keenan)\nnot Spiffing(keenan)\nOutboard(keenan)\nRousseauan(dix)\nQuelled(dix)\nnot Dire(dix)\nSpiffing(dix)\nnot Outboard(dix)\nQuelled(davey)\nPesky(davey)\nDire(davey)\nforall x (Quelled(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nforall x (Pesky(x) and not Dire(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nSpiffing(davey) and Quelled(davey) -> Rousseauan(davey)\n\nRousseauan(keenan)\n\ntherefore Rousseauan(keenan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Stacie is mucinoid. Stacie is not gingery. Stacie is copious. Stacie is aimless. Stacie is maddened. Stacie is not backmost. Stacie is numerate. Kacy is mucinoid. Kacy is gingery. Kacy is not maddened. Kacy is backmost. Kacy is not numerate. Alfreda is gingery. Alfreda is copious. Alfreda is maddened. Green things are backmost. If something is copious and not maddened then it is backmost. If Alfreda is backmost and Alfreda is gingery then Alfreda is mucinoid. Alfreda is not gingery.", "logic": "\nMucinoid(stacie)\nnot Gingery(stacie)\nCopious(stacie)\nAimless(stacie)\nMaddened(stacie)\nnot Backmost(stacie)\nNumerate(stacie)\nMucinoid(kacy)\nGingery(kacy)\nnot Maddened(kacy)\nBackmost(kacy)\nnot Numerate(kacy)\nGingery(alfreda)\nCopious(alfreda)\nMaddened(alfreda)\nforall x (Gingery(x) -> Backmost(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) and not Maddened(x) -> Backmost(x))\nBackmost(alfreda) and Gingery(alfreda) -> Mucinoid(alfreda)\n\nnot Gingery(alfreda)\n\ntherefore Gingery(alfreda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Stevena is titulary. Stevena is not cutting. Stevena is pouched. Stevena is obdurate. Stevena is soppy. Stevena is not allogamous. Stevena is spermous. Mandie is titulary. Mandie is cutting. Mandie is not soppy. Mandie is allogamous. Mandie is not spermous. Nicholas is cutting. Nicholas is pouched. Nicholas is soppy. Green things are allogamous. If something is pouched and not soppy then it is allogamous. If Nicholas is allogamous and Nicholas is cutting then Nicholas is titulary. Nicholas is allogamous.", "logic": "\nTitulary(stevena)\nnot Cutting(stevena)\nPouched(stevena)\nObdurate(stevena)\nSoppy(stevena)\nnot Allogamous(stevena)\nSpermous(stevena)\nTitulary(mandie)\nCutting(mandie)\nnot Soppy(mandie)\nAllogamous(mandie)\nnot Spermous(mandie)\nCutting(nicholas)\nPouched(nicholas)\nSoppy(nicholas)\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nforall x (Pouched(x) and not Soppy(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nAllogamous(nicholas) and Cutting(nicholas) -> Titulary(nicholas)\n\nAllogamous(nicholas)\n\nCutting(nicholas) and forall x (Cutting(x) -> Allogamous(x)) -> therefore Allogamous(nicholas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Merwin is sinhala. Merwin is not hogged. Merwin is advancing. Merwin is prophetic. Merwin is shimmery. Merwin is not tumid. Merwin is slaphappy. Doralia is sinhala. Doralia is hogged. Doralia is not shimmery. Doralia is tumid. Doralia is not slaphappy. Lucio is hogged. Lucio is advancing. Lucio is shimmery. Green things are tumid. If something is advancing and not shimmery then it is tumid. If Lucio is tumid and Lucio is hogged then Lucio is sinhala. Lucio is not tumid.", "logic": "\nSinhala(merwin)\nnot Hogged(merwin)\nAdvancing(merwin)\nProphetic(merwin)\nShimmery(merwin)\nnot Tumid(merwin)\nSlaphappy(merwin)\nSinhala(doralia)\nHogged(doralia)\nnot Shimmery(doralia)\nTumid(doralia)\nnot Slaphappy(doralia)\nHogged(lucio)\nAdvancing(lucio)\nShimmery(lucio)\nforall x (Hogged(x) -> Tumid(x))\nforall x (Advancing(x) and not Shimmery(x) -> Tumid(x))\nTumid(lucio) and Hogged(lucio) -> Sinhala(lucio)\n\nnot Tumid(lucio)\n\nHogged(lucio) and forall x (Hogged(x) -> Tumid(x)) -> therefore Tumid(lucio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Goose is presto. Goose is not jingling. Goose is crimson. Goose is chic. Goose is liliaceous. Goose is not doable. Goose is mobile. Daniela is presto. Daniela is jingling. Daniela is not liliaceous. Daniela is doable. Daniela is not mobile. Lemuel is jingling. Lemuel is crimson. Lemuel is liliaceous. Green things are doable. If something is crimson and not liliaceous then it is doable. If Lemuel is doable and Lemuel is jingling then Lemuel is presto. Lemuel is presto.", "logic": "\nPresto(goose)\nnot Jingling(goose)\nCrimson(goose)\nChic(goose)\nLiliaceous(goose)\nnot Doable(goose)\nMobile(goose)\nPresto(daniela)\nJingling(daniela)\nnot Liliaceous(daniela)\nDoable(daniela)\nnot Mobile(daniela)\nJingling(lemuel)\nCrimson(lemuel)\nLiliaceous(lemuel)\nforall x (Jingling(x) -> Doable(x))\nforall x (Crimson(x) and not Liliaceous(x) -> Doable(x))\nDoable(lemuel) and Jingling(lemuel) -> Presto(lemuel)\n\nPresto(lemuel)\n\nJingling(lemuel) and forall x (Jingling(x) -> Doable(x)) -> therefore Doable(lemuel) Doable(lemuel) and Jingling(lemuel) and Doable(lemuel) and Jingling(lemuel) -> Presto(lemuel) -> therefore Presto(lemuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Oliver is uninfected. Oliver is not deathlike. Oliver is spinnbar. Oliver is unfastened. Oliver is soignee. Oliver is not highflying. Oliver is reddish. Harley is uninfected. Harley is deathlike. Harley is not soignee. Harley is highflying. Harley is not reddish. Jordy is deathlike. Jordy is spinnbar. Jordy is soignee. Green things are highflying. If something is spinnbar and not soignee then it is highflying. If Jordy is highflying and Jordy is deathlike then Jordy is uninfected. Jordy is not uninfected.", "logic": "\nUninfected(oliver)\nnot Deathlike(oliver)\nSpinnbar(oliver)\nUnfastened(oliver)\nSoignee(oliver)\nnot Highflying(oliver)\nReddish(oliver)\nUninfected(harley)\nDeathlike(harley)\nnot Soignee(harley)\nHighflying(harley)\nnot Reddish(harley)\nDeathlike(jordy)\nSpinnbar(jordy)\nSoignee(jordy)\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Highflying(x))\nforall x (Spinnbar(x) and not Soignee(x) -> Highflying(x))\nHighflying(jordy) and Deathlike(jordy) -> Uninfected(jordy)\n\nnot Uninfected(jordy)\n\nDeathlike(jordy) and forall x (Deathlike(x) -> Highflying(x)) -> therefore Highflying(jordy) Highflying(jordy) and Deathlike(jordy) and Highflying(jordy) and Deathlike(jordy) -> Uninfected(jordy) -> therefore Uninfected(jordy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Timmi is fortissimo. Timmi is not bodily. Timmi is golden. Timmi is painterly. Timmi is keyed. Timmi is not ceramic. Timmi is bolshy. Mavra is fortissimo. Mavra is bodily. Mavra is not keyed. Mavra is ceramic. Mavra is not bolshy. Odysseus is bodily. Odysseus is golden. Odysseus is keyed. Green things are ceramic. If something is golden and not keyed then it is ceramic. If Odysseus is ceramic and Odysseus is bodily then Odysseus is fortissimo. Odysseus is not painterly.", "logic": "\nFortissimo(timmi)\nnot Bodily(timmi)\nGolden(timmi)\nPainterly(timmi)\nKeyed(timmi)\nnot Ceramic(timmi)\nBolshy(timmi)\nFortissimo(mavra)\nBodily(mavra)\nnot Keyed(mavra)\nCeramic(mavra)\nnot Bolshy(mavra)\nBodily(odysseus)\nGolden(odysseus)\nKeyed(odysseus)\nforall x (Bodily(x) -> Ceramic(x))\nforall x (Golden(x) and not Keyed(x) -> Ceramic(x))\nCeramic(odysseus) and Bodily(odysseus) -> Fortissimo(odysseus)\n\nnot Painterly(odysseus)\n\nnot Painterly(odysseus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Vale is sidereal. Vale is not sloughy. Vale is entitled. Vale is brachiopod. Vale is wilful. Vale is not actuating. Vale is narrowing. Artie is sidereal. Artie is sloughy. Artie is not wilful. Artie is actuating. Artie is not narrowing. Matthias is sloughy. Matthias is entitled. Matthias is wilful. Green things are actuating. If something is entitled and not wilful then it is actuating. If Matthias is actuating and Matthias is sloughy then Matthias is sidereal. Artie is entitled.", "logic": "\nSidereal(vale)\nnot Sloughy(vale)\nEntitled(vale)\nBrachiopod(vale)\nWilful(vale)\nnot Actuating(vale)\nNarrowing(vale)\nSidereal(artie)\nSloughy(artie)\nnot Wilful(artie)\nActuating(artie)\nnot Narrowing(artie)\nSloughy(matthias)\nEntitled(matthias)\nWilful(matthias)\nforall x (Sloughy(x) -> Actuating(x))\nforall x (Entitled(x) and not Wilful(x) -> Actuating(x))\nActuating(matthias) and Sloughy(matthias) -> Sidereal(matthias)\n\nEntitled(artie)\n\nEntitled(artie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Hollie is ivied. Hollie is not coalesced. Hollie is partial. Hollie is yellowed. Hollie is consular. Hollie is not groping. Hollie is ariled. Marylinda is ivied. Marylinda is coalesced. Marylinda is not consular. Marylinda is groping. Marylinda is not ariled. Grata is coalesced. Grata is partial. Grata is consular. Green things are groping. If something is partial and not consular then it is groping. If Grata is groping and Grata is coalesced then Grata is ivied. Grata is not ariled.", "logic": "\nIvied(hollie)\nnot Coalesced(hollie)\nPartial(hollie)\nYellowed(hollie)\nConsular(hollie)\nnot Groping(hollie)\nAriled(hollie)\nIvied(marylinda)\nCoalesced(marylinda)\nnot Consular(marylinda)\nGroping(marylinda)\nnot Ariled(marylinda)\nCoalesced(grata)\nPartial(grata)\nConsular(grata)\nforall x (Coalesced(x) -> Groping(x))\nforall x (Partial(x) and not Consular(x) -> Groping(x))\nGroping(grata) and Coalesced(grata) -> Ivied(grata)\n\nnot Ariled(grata)\n\nnot Ariled(grata) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Nathanial is unlimited. Nathanial is not marauding. Nathanial is disclosed. Nathanial is wheelless. Nathanial is budgetary. Nathanial is not venetian. Nathanial is pudendal. Alicea is unlimited. Alicea is marauding. Alicea is not budgetary. Alicea is venetian. Alicea is not pudendal. Leona is marauding. Leona is disclosed. Leona is budgetary. Green things are venetian. If something is disclosed and not budgetary then it is venetian. If Leona is venetian and Leona is marauding then Leona is unlimited. Alicea is wheelless.", "logic": "\nUnlimited(nathanial)\nnot Marauding(nathanial)\nDisclosed(nathanial)\nWheelless(nathanial)\nBudgetary(nathanial)\nnot Venetian(nathanial)\nPudendal(nathanial)\nUnlimited(alicea)\nMarauding(alicea)\nnot Budgetary(alicea)\nVenetian(alicea)\nnot Pudendal(alicea)\nMarauding(leona)\nDisclosed(leona)\nBudgetary(leona)\nforall x (Marauding(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Disclosed(x) and not Budgetary(x) -> Venetian(x))\nVenetian(leona) and Marauding(leona) -> Unlimited(leona)\n\nWheelless(alicea)\n\nWheelless(alicea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1537"} {"premises": "Briney is hyperbolic. Briney is quilted. Briney is unarmed. Red, detailed things are unarmed. If something is unarmed and hyperbolic then it is detailed. Red, detailed things are diachronic. Briney is quilted.", "logic": "\nHyperbolic(briney)\nQuilted(briney)\nUnarmed(briney)\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) and Detailed(x) -> Unarmed(x))\nforall x (Unarmed(x) and Hyperbolic(x) -> Detailed(x))\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) and Detailed(x) -> Diachronic(x))\n\nQuilted(briney)\n\ntherefore Quilted(briney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Laureen is flatbottom. Laureen is shortish. Laureen is impalpable. Red, spiffy things are impalpable. If something is impalpable and flatbottom then it is spiffy. Red, spiffy things are fossil. Laureen is not shortish.", "logic": "\nFlatbottom(laureen)\nShortish(laureen)\nImpalpable(laureen)\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) and Spiffy(x) -> Impalpable(x))\nforall x (Impalpable(x) and Flatbottom(x) -> Spiffy(x))\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) and Spiffy(x) -> Fossil(x))\n\nnot Shortish(laureen)\n\ntherefore Shortish(laureen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Ephraim is squinty. Ephraim is afghan. Ephraim is unafraid. Red, arteriolar things are unafraid. If something is unafraid and squinty then it is arteriolar. Red, arteriolar things are dominated. Ephraim is arteriolar.", "logic": "\nSquinty(ephraim)\nAfghan(ephraim)\nUnafraid(ephraim)\nforall x (Squinty(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Unafraid(x) and Squinty(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nforall x (Squinty(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Dominated(x))\n\nArteriolar(ephraim)\n\nUnafraid(ephraim) and Squinty(ephraim) and forall x (Unafraid(x) and Squinty(x) -> Arteriolar(x)) -> therefore Arteriolar(ephraim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Irena is extensible. Irena is respondent. Irena is overripe. Red, permeant things are overripe. If something is overripe and extensible then it is permeant. Red, permeant things are pilar. Irena is not permeant.", "logic": "\nExtensible(irena)\nRespondent(irena)\nOverripe(irena)\nforall x (Extensible(x) and Permeant(x) -> Overripe(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) and Extensible(x) -> Permeant(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) and Permeant(x) -> Pilar(x))\n\nnot Permeant(irena)\n\nOverripe(irena) and Extensible(irena) and forall x (Overripe(x) and Extensible(x) -> Permeant(x)) -> therefore Permeant(irena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Barnard is cyprian. Barnard is weaponed. Barnard is paired. Red, phylliform things are paired. If something is paired and cyprian then it is phylliform. Red, phylliform things are atonic. Barnard is atonic.", "logic": "\nCyprian(barnard)\nWeaponed(barnard)\nPaired(barnard)\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and Phylliform(x) -> Paired(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and Phylliform(x) -> Atonic(x))\n\nAtonic(barnard)\n\nPaired(barnard) and Cyprian(barnard) and forall x (Paired(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Phylliform(x)) -> therefore Phylliform(barnard) Cyprian(barnard) and Phylliform(barnard) and forall x (Cyprian(x) and Phylliform(x) -> Atonic(x)) -> therefore Atonic(barnard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Nance is ignitible. Nance is permutable. Nance is looted. Red, clownlike things are looted. If something is looted and ignitible then it is clownlike. Red, clownlike things are appellate. Nance is not appellate.", "logic": "\nIgnitible(nance)\nPermutable(nance)\nLooted(nance)\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Clownlike(x) -> Looted(x))\nforall x (Looted(x) and Ignitible(x) -> Clownlike(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Clownlike(x) -> Appellate(x))\n\nnot Appellate(nance)\n\nLooted(nance) and Ignitible(nance) and forall x (Looted(x) and Ignitible(x) -> Clownlike(x)) -> therefore Clownlike(nance) Ignitible(nance) and Clownlike(nance) and forall x (Ignitible(x) and Clownlike(x) -> Appellate(x)) -> therefore Appellate(nance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Selby is sectarian. Selby is dumpy. Selby is aeronautic. Red, daedal things are aeronautic. If something is aeronautic and sectarian then it is daedal. Red, daedal things are acoustical. Selby is not white.", "logic": "\nSectarian(selby)\nDumpy(selby)\nAeronautic(selby)\nforall x (Sectarian(x) and Daedal(x) -> Aeronautic(x))\nforall x (Aeronautic(x) and Sectarian(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) and Daedal(x) -> Acoustical(x))\n\nnot White(selby)\n\nnot White(selby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Meggie is crashing. Meggie is evident. Meggie is visaged. Red, appendant things are visaged. If something is visaged and crashing then it is appendant. Red, appendant things are woodsy. Meggie is big.", "logic": "\nCrashing(meggie)\nEvident(meggie)\nVisaged(meggie)\nforall x (Crashing(x) and Appendant(x) -> Visaged(x))\nforall x (Visaged(x) and Crashing(x) -> Appendant(x))\nforall x (Crashing(x) and Appendant(x) -> Woodsy(x))\n\nBig(meggie)\n\nBig(meggie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Greta is eastside. Greta is lusitanian. Greta is mislaid. Roscoe is not lusitanian. Roscoe is not reparable. Roscoe is primary. Sharai is not eastside. Sharai is esteemed. Sharai is chartless. Sharai is primary. Quiet, esteemed people are not mislaid. Nice people are reparable. Big, esteemed people are reparable. If someone is chartless then they are primary. If Greta is reparable then Greta is primary. If someone is reparable and not mislaid then they are lusitanian. Roscoe is not lusitanian.", "logic": "\nEastside(greta)\nLusitanian(greta)\nMislaid(greta)\nnot Lusitanian(roscoe)\nnot Reparable(roscoe)\nPrimary(roscoe)\nnot Eastside(sharai)\nEsteemed(sharai)\nChartless(sharai)\nPrimary(sharai)\nforall x (Reparable(x) and Esteemed(x) -> not Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> Reparable(x))\nforall x (Eastside(x) and Esteemed(x) -> Reparable(x))\nforall x (Chartless(x) -> Primary(x))\nReparable(greta) -> Primary(greta)\nforall x (Reparable(x) and not Mislaid(x) -> Lusitanian(x))\n\nnot Lusitanian(roscoe)\n\ntherefore not Lusitanian(roscoe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Morton is nocent. Morton is fruity. Morton is aneurysmal. Mendel is not fruity. Mendel is not cloistral. Mendel is skewed. Eryn is not nocent. Eryn is bone. Eryn is clubby. Eryn is skewed. Quiet, bone people are not aneurysmal. Nice people are cloistral. Big, bone people are cloistral. If someone is clubby then they are skewed. If Morton is cloistral then Morton is skewed. If someone is cloistral and not aneurysmal then they are fruity. Morton is not aneurysmal.", "logic": "\nNocent(morton)\nFruity(morton)\nAneurysmal(morton)\nnot Fruity(mendel)\nnot Cloistral(mendel)\nSkewed(mendel)\nnot Nocent(eryn)\nBone(eryn)\nClubby(eryn)\nSkewed(eryn)\nforall x (Cloistral(x) and Bone(x) -> not Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Cloistral(x))\nforall x (Nocent(x) and Bone(x) -> Cloistral(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> Skewed(x))\nCloistral(morton) -> Skewed(morton)\nforall x (Cloistral(x) and not Aneurysmal(x) -> Fruity(x))\n\nnot Aneurysmal(morton)\n\ntherefore Aneurysmal(morton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Marybeth is agonised. Marybeth is pretorial. Marybeth is falconine. Elfie is not pretorial. Elfie is not caudate. Elfie is debonair. Rachelle is not agonised. Rachelle is huffish. Rachelle is explicit. Rachelle is debonair. Quiet, huffish people are not falconine. Nice people are caudate. Big, huffish people are caudate. If someone is explicit then they are debonair. If Marybeth is caudate then Marybeth is debonair. If someone is caudate and not falconine then they are pretorial. Marybeth is caudate.", "logic": "\nAgonised(marybeth)\nPretorial(marybeth)\nFalconine(marybeth)\nnot Pretorial(elfie)\nnot Caudate(elfie)\nDebonair(elfie)\nnot Agonised(rachelle)\nHuffish(rachelle)\nExplicit(rachelle)\nDebonair(rachelle)\nforall x (Caudate(x) and Huffish(x) -> not Falconine(x))\nforall x (Falconine(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Agonised(x) and Huffish(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Explicit(x) -> Debonair(x))\nCaudate(marybeth) -> Debonair(marybeth)\nforall x (Caudate(x) and not Falconine(x) -> Pretorial(x))\n\nCaudate(marybeth)\n\nFalconine(marybeth) and forall x (Falconine(x) -> Caudate(x)) -> therefore Caudate(marybeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Kenny is tearless. Kenny is agnatic. Kenny is unratified. Geoff is not agnatic. Geoff is not bordered. Geoff is arboreous. Rosabel is not tearless. Rosabel is noisy. Rosabel is immemorial. Rosabel is arboreous. Quiet, noisy people are not unratified. Nice people are bordered. Big, noisy people are bordered. If someone is immemorial then they are arboreous. If Kenny is bordered then Kenny is arboreous. If someone is bordered and not unratified then they are agnatic. Kenny is not bordered.", "logic": "\nTearless(kenny)\nAgnatic(kenny)\nUnratified(kenny)\nnot Agnatic(geoff)\nnot Bordered(geoff)\nArboreous(geoff)\nnot Tearless(rosabel)\nNoisy(rosabel)\nImmemorial(rosabel)\nArboreous(rosabel)\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Noisy(x) -> not Unratified(x))\nforall x (Unratified(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Tearless(x) and Noisy(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Immemorial(x) -> Arboreous(x))\nBordered(kenny) -> Arboreous(kenny)\nforall x (Bordered(x) and not Unratified(x) -> Agnatic(x))\n\nnot Bordered(kenny)\n\nUnratified(kenny) and forall x (Unratified(x) -> Bordered(x)) -> therefore Bordered(kenny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Shayne is awash. Shayne is awless. Shayne is placable. Mella is not awless. Mella is not loamless. Mella is tonal. Jock is not awash. Jock is diamantine. Jock is agreeable. Jock is tonal. Quiet, diamantine people are not placable. Nice people are loamless. Big, diamantine people are loamless. If someone is agreeable then they are tonal. If Shayne is loamless then Shayne is tonal. If someone is loamless and not placable then they are awless. Shayne is tonal.", "logic": "\nAwash(shayne)\nAwless(shayne)\nPlacable(shayne)\nnot Awless(mella)\nnot Loamless(mella)\nTonal(mella)\nnot Awash(jock)\nDiamantine(jock)\nAgreeable(jock)\nTonal(jock)\nforall x (Loamless(x) and Diamantine(x) -> not Placable(x))\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Loamless(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Diamantine(x) -> Loamless(x))\nforall x (Agreeable(x) -> Tonal(x))\nLoamless(shayne) -> Tonal(shayne)\nforall x (Loamless(x) and not Placable(x) -> Awless(x))\n\nTonal(shayne)\n\nPlacable(shayne) and forall x (Placable(x) -> Loamless(x)) -> therefore Loamless(shayne) Loamless(shayne) and Loamless(shayne) -> Tonal(shayne) -> therefore Tonal(shayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Guy is southerly. Guy is marbled. Guy is brute. Dean is not marbled. Dean is not honey. Dean is unshaven. Mahmoud is not southerly. Mahmoud is tardy. Mahmoud is sellable. Mahmoud is unshaven. Quiet, tardy people are not brute. Nice people are honey. Big, tardy people are honey. If someone is sellable then they are unshaven. If Guy is honey then Guy is unshaven. If someone is honey and not brute then they are marbled. Guy is not unshaven.", "logic": "\nSoutherly(guy)\nMarbled(guy)\nBrute(guy)\nnot Marbled(dean)\nnot Honey(dean)\nUnshaven(dean)\nnot Southerly(mahmoud)\nTardy(mahmoud)\nSellable(mahmoud)\nUnshaven(mahmoud)\nforall x (Honey(x) and Tardy(x) -> not Brute(x))\nforall x (Brute(x) -> Honey(x))\nforall x (Southerly(x) and Tardy(x) -> Honey(x))\nforall x (Sellable(x) -> Unshaven(x))\nHoney(guy) -> Unshaven(guy)\nforall x (Honey(x) and not Brute(x) -> Marbled(x))\n\nnot Unshaven(guy)\n\nBrute(guy) and forall x (Brute(x) -> Honey(x)) -> therefore Honey(guy) Honey(guy) and Honey(guy) -> Unshaven(guy) -> therefore Unshaven(guy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Reynard is tinpot. Reynard is truant. Reynard is emulous. Lonee is not truant. Lonee is not unfledged. Lonee is partial. Mateo is not tinpot. Mateo is idle. Mateo is unabridged. Mateo is partial. Quiet, idle people are not emulous. Nice people are unfledged. Big, idle people are unfledged. If someone is unabridged then they are partial. If Reynard is unfledged then Reynard is partial. If someone is unfledged and not emulous then they are truant. Mateo is not truant.", "logic": "\nTinpot(reynard)\nTruant(reynard)\nEmulous(reynard)\nnot Truant(lonee)\nnot Unfledged(lonee)\nPartial(lonee)\nnot Tinpot(mateo)\nIdle(mateo)\nUnabridged(mateo)\nPartial(mateo)\nforall x (Unfledged(x) and Idle(x) -> not Emulous(x))\nforall x (Emulous(x) -> Unfledged(x))\nforall x (Tinpot(x) and Idle(x) -> Unfledged(x))\nforall x (Unabridged(x) -> Partial(x))\nUnfledged(reynard) -> Partial(reynard)\nforall x (Unfledged(x) and not Emulous(x) -> Truant(x))\n\nnot Truant(mateo)\n\nforall x (Unfledged(x) and not Emulous(x) -> Truant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Nathanil is earthbound. Nathanil is affordable. Nathanil is particular. Jarrett is not affordable. Jarrett is not cuddlesome. Jarrett is mensal. Flo is not earthbound. Flo is reflex. Flo is informal. Flo is mensal. Quiet, reflex people are not particular. Nice people are cuddlesome. Big, reflex people are cuddlesome. If someone is informal then they are mensal. If Nathanil is cuddlesome then Nathanil is mensal. If someone is cuddlesome and not particular then they are affordable. Flo is cuddlesome.", "logic": "\nEarthbound(nathanil)\nAffordable(nathanil)\nParticular(nathanil)\nnot Affordable(jarrett)\nnot Cuddlesome(jarrett)\nMensal(jarrett)\nnot Earthbound(flo)\nReflex(flo)\nInformal(flo)\nMensal(flo)\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) and Reflex(x) -> not Particular(x))\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) and Reflex(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Mensal(x))\nCuddlesome(nathanil) -> Mensal(nathanil)\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) and not Particular(x) -> Affordable(x))\n\nCuddlesome(flo)\n\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Cuddlesome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Lawrence is judaical. Lawrence is nonimmune. Lawrence is prisonlike. Leoine is not nonimmune. Leoine is not choosey. Leoine is frigorific. Yacov is not judaical. Yacov is lossless. Yacov is simian. Yacov is frigorific. Quiet, lossless people are not prisonlike. Nice people are choosey. Big, lossless people are choosey. If someone is simian then they are frigorific. If Lawrence is choosey then Lawrence is frigorific. If someone is choosey and not prisonlike then they are nonimmune. Lawrence is not lossless.", "logic": "\nJudaical(lawrence)\nNonimmune(lawrence)\nPrisonlike(lawrence)\nnot Nonimmune(leoine)\nnot Choosey(leoine)\nFrigorific(leoine)\nnot Judaical(yacov)\nLossless(yacov)\nSimian(yacov)\nFrigorific(yacov)\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Lossless(x) -> not Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Judaical(x) and Lossless(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Simian(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nChoosey(lawrence) -> Frigorific(lawrence)\nforall x (Choosey(x) and not Prisonlike(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\n\nnot Lossless(lawrence)\n\nnot Lossless(lawrence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Dorelle is hoofed. Dorelle is unpowered. Dorelle is liverish. Arlinda is not unpowered. Arlinda is not isthmian. Arlinda is galwegian. Kizzie is not hoofed. Kizzie is indicative. Kizzie is likely. Kizzie is galwegian. Quiet, indicative people are not liverish. Nice people are isthmian. Big, indicative people are isthmian. If someone is likely then they are galwegian. If Dorelle is isthmian then Dorelle is galwegian. If someone is isthmian and not liverish then they are unpowered. Kizzie is liverish.", "logic": "\nHoofed(dorelle)\nUnpowered(dorelle)\nLiverish(dorelle)\nnot Unpowered(arlinda)\nnot Isthmian(arlinda)\nGalwegian(arlinda)\nnot Hoofed(kizzie)\nIndicative(kizzie)\nLikely(kizzie)\nGalwegian(kizzie)\nforall x (Isthmian(x) and Indicative(x) -> not Liverish(x))\nforall x (Liverish(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Indicative(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Galwegian(x))\nIsthmian(dorelle) -> Galwegian(dorelle)\nforall x (Isthmian(x) and not Liverish(x) -> Unpowered(x))\n\nLiverish(kizzie)\n\nLiverish(kizzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Eleanore is spongelike. Eleanore is unsightly. Eleanore is accusatory. Ben is not unsightly. Ben is not outbound. Ben is battered. Merola is not spongelike. Merola is extradural. Merola is aquaphobic. Merola is battered. Quiet, extradural people are not accusatory. Nice people are outbound. Big, extradural people are outbound. If someone is aquaphobic then they are battered. If Eleanore is outbound then Eleanore is battered. If someone is outbound and not accusatory then they are unsightly. Eleanore is not aquaphobic.", "logic": "\nSpongelike(eleanore)\nUnsightly(eleanore)\nAccusatory(eleanore)\nnot Unsightly(ben)\nnot Outbound(ben)\nBattered(ben)\nnot Spongelike(merola)\nExtradural(merola)\nAquaphobic(merola)\nBattered(merola)\nforall x (Outbound(x) and Extradural(x) -> not Accusatory(x))\nforall x (Accusatory(x) -> Outbound(x))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) and Extradural(x) -> Outbound(x))\nforall x (Aquaphobic(x) -> Battered(x))\nOutbound(eleanore) -> Battered(eleanore)\nforall x (Outbound(x) and not Accusatory(x) -> Unsightly(x))\n\nnot Aquaphobic(eleanore)\n\nnot Aquaphobic(eleanore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "Golda is floccose. Golda is metric. Golda is paneled. Charo is not metric. Charo is not conelike. Charo is factious. Caroline is not floccose. Caroline is mitigative. Caroline is buirdly. Caroline is factious. Quiet, mitigative people are not paneled. Nice people are conelike. Big, mitigative people are conelike. If someone is buirdly then they are factious. If Golda is conelike then Golda is factious. If someone is conelike and not paneled then they are metric. Charo is floccose.", "logic": "\nFloccose(golda)\nMetric(golda)\nPaneled(golda)\nnot Metric(charo)\nnot Conelike(charo)\nFactious(charo)\nnot Floccose(caroline)\nMitigative(caroline)\nBuirdly(caroline)\nFactious(caroline)\nforall x (Conelike(x) and Mitigative(x) -> not Paneled(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Conelike(x))\nforall x (Floccose(x) and Mitigative(x) -> Conelike(x))\nforall x (Buirdly(x) -> Factious(x))\nConelike(golda) -> Factious(golda)\nforall x (Conelike(x) and not Paneled(x) -> Metric(x))\n\nFloccose(charo)\n\nFloccose(charo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1365"} {"premises": "The shadow does not like the weylin. The weylin yaup the shadow. If someone recommence the weylin then the weylin does not like the shadow. If someone yaup the shadow then the shadow is not periodic. If someone yaup the shadow then the shadow recommence the weylin. If someone recommence the shadow then the shadow recommence the weylin. If the shadow yaup the weylin then the weylin yaup the shadow. If someone coiffure the weylin and the weylin is not lxxxiv then they do not like the shadow. If the shadow does not visit the weylin then the shadow is lxxxiv. If the weylin coiffure the shadow and the weylin does not visit the shadow then the shadow is lxxxiv. The weylin yaup the shadow.", "logic": "\nnot Coiffure(shadow, weylin)\nYaup(weylin, shadow)\nforall x (Recommence(x, weylin) -> not Coiffure(weylin, shadow))\nforall x (Yaup(x, shadow) -> not Periodic(shadow))\nforall x (Yaup(x, shadow) -> Recommence(shadow, weylin))\nforall x (Recommence(x, shadow) -> Recommence(shadow, weylin))\nYaup(shadow, weylin) -> Yaup(weylin, shadow)\nforall x (Coiffure(x, weylin) and not Lxxxiv(weylin) -> not Coiffure(x, shadow))\nnot Recommence(shadow, weylin) -> Lxxxiv(shadow)\nCoiffure(weylin, shadow) and not Recommence(weylin, shadow) -> Lxxxiv(shadow)\n\nYaup(weylin, shadow)\n\ntherefore Yaup(weylin, shadow)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The jessie does not like the derrin. The derrin snicker the jessie. If someone faze the derrin then the derrin does not like the jessie. If someone snicker the jessie then the jessie is not zionist. If someone snicker the jessie then the jessie faze the derrin. If someone faze the jessie then the jessie faze the derrin. If the jessie snicker the derrin then the derrin snicker the jessie. If someone piss the derrin and the derrin is not amblyopic then they do not like the jessie. If the jessie does not visit the derrin then the jessie is amblyopic. If the derrin piss the jessie and the derrin does not visit the jessie then the jessie is amblyopic. The derrin does not need the jessie.", "logic": "\nnot Piss(jessie, derrin)\nSnicker(derrin, jessie)\nforall x (Faze(x, derrin) -> not Piss(derrin, jessie))\nforall x (Snicker(x, jessie) -> not Zionist(jessie))\nforall x (Snicker(x, jessie) -> Faze(jessie, derrin))\nforall x (Faze(x, jessie) -> Faze(jessie, derrin))\nSnicker(jessie, derrin) -> Snicker(derrin, jessie)\nforall x (Piss(x, derrin) and not Amblyopic(derrin) -> not Piss(x, jessie))\nnot Faze(jessie, derrin) -> Amblyopic(jessie)\nPiss(derrin, jessie) and not Faze(derrin, jessie) -> Amblyopic(jessie)\n\nnot Snicker(derrin, jessie)\n\ntherefore Snicker(derrin, jessie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The robin does not like the elisha. The elisha intrigue the robin. If someone carpenter the elisha then the elisha does not like the robin. If someone intrigue the robin then the robin is not dissident. If someone intrigue the robin then the robin carpenter the elisha. If someone carpenter the robin then the robin carpenter the elisha. If the robin intrigue the elisha then the elisha intrigue the robin. If someone amnesty the elisha and the elisha is not reported then they do not like the robin. If the robin does not visit the elisha then the robin is reported. If the elisha amnesty the robin and the elisha does not visit the robin then the robin is reported. The robin is not dissident.", "logic": "\nnot Amnesty(robin, elisha)\nIntrigue(elisha, robin)\nforall x (Carpenter(x, elisha) -> not Amnesty(elisha, robin))\nforall x (Intrigue(x, robin) -> not Dissident(robin))\nforall x (Intrigue(x, robin) -> Carpenter(robin, elisha))\nforall x (Carpenter(x, robin) -> Carpenter(robin, elisha))\nIntrigue(robin, elisha) -> Intrigue(elisha, robin)\nforall x (Amnesty(x, elisha) and not Reported(elisha) -> not Amnesty(x, robin))\nnot Carpenter(robin, elisha) -> Reported(robin)\nAmnesty(elisha, robin) and not Carpenter(elisha, robin) -> Reported(robin)\n\nnot Dissident(robin)\n\nIntrigue(elisha, robin) and forall x (Intrigue(x, robin) -> not Dissident(robin)) -> therefore not Dissident(robin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The waldo does not like the evette. The evette normalise the waldo. If someone disavow the evette then the evette does not like the waldo. If someone normalise the waldo then the waldo is not exalting. If someone normalise the waldo then the waldo disavow the evette. If someone disavow the waldo then the waldo disavow the evette. If the waldo normalise the evette then the evette normalise the waldo. If someone snow the evette and the evette is not smothered then they do not like the waldo. If the waldo does not visit the evette then the waldo is smothered. If the evette snow the waldo and the evette does not visit the waldo then the waldo is smothered. The waldo does not visit the evette.", "logic": "\nnot Snow(waldo, evette)\nNormalise(evette, waldo)\nforall x (Disavow(x, evette) -> not Snow(evette, waldo))\nforall x (Normalise(x, waldo) -> not Exalting(waldo))\nforall x (Normalise(x, waldo) -> Disavow(waldo, evette))\nforall x (Disavow(x, waldo) -> Disavow(waldo, evette))\nNormalise(waldo, evette) -> Normalise(evette, waldo)\nforall x (Snow(x, evette) and not Smothered(evette) -> not Snow(x, waldo))\nnot Disavow(waldo, evette) -> Smothered(waldo)\nSnow(evette, waldo) and not Disavow(evette, waldo) -> Smothered(waldo)\n\nnot Disavow(waldo, evette)\n\nNormalise(evette, waldo) and forall x (Normalise(x, waldo) -> Disavow(waldo, evette)) -> therefore Disavow(waldo, evette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The rogers does not like the ailey. The ailey snuggle the rogers. If someone eavesdrop the ailey then the ailey does not like the rogers. If someone snuggle the rogers then the rogers is not jangly. If someone snuggle the rogers then the rogers eavesdrop the ailey. If someone eavesdrop the rogers then the rogers eavesdrop the ailey. If the rogers snuggle the ailey then the ailey snuggle the rogers. If someone flag the ailey and the ailey is not ulnar then they do not like the rogers. If the rogers does not visit the ailey then the rogers is ulnar. If the ailey flag the rogers and the ailey does not visit the rogers then the rogers is ulnar. The ailey does not like the rogers.", "logic": "\nnot Flag(rogers, ailey)\nSnuggle(ailey, rogers)\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, ailey) -> not Flag(ailey, rogers))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, rogers) -> not Jangly(rogers))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, rogers) -> Eavesdrop(rogers, ailey))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, rogers) -> Eavesdrop(rogers, ailey))\nSnuggle(rogers, ailey) -> Snuggle(ailey, rogers)\nforall x (Flag(x, ailey) and not Ulnar(ailey) -> not Flag(x, rogers))\nnot Eavesdrop(rogers, ailey) -> Ulnar(rogers)\nFlag(ailey, rogers) and not Eavesdrop(ailey, rogers) -> Ulnar(rogers)\n\nnot Flag(ailey, rogers)\n\nSnuggle(ailey, rogers) and forall x (Snuggle(x, rogers) -> Eavesdrop(rogers, ailey)) -> therefore Eavesdrop(rogers, ailey) Eavesdrop(rogers, ailey) and forall x (Eavesdrop(x, ailey) -> not Flag(ailey, rogers)) -> therefore not Flag(ailey, rogers)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The magdaia does not like the nady. The nady auspicate the magdaia. If someone cleanse the nady then the nady does not like the magdaia. If someone auspicate the magdaia then the magdaia is not restful. If someone auspicate the magdaia then the magdaia cleanse the nady. If someone cleanse the magdaia then the magdaia cleanse the nady. If the magdaia auspicate the nady then the nady auspicate the magdaia. If someone motion the nady and the nady is not shot then they do not like the magdaia. If the magdaia does not visit the nady then the magdaia is shot. If the nady motion the magdaia and the nady does not visit the magdaia then the magdaia is shot. The nady motion the magdaia.", "logic": "\nnot Motion(magdaia, nady)\nAuspicate(nady, magdaia)\nforall x (Cleanse(x, nady) -> not Motion(nady, magdaia))\nforall x (Auspicate(x, magdaia) -> not Restful(magdaia))\nforall x (Auspicate(x, magdaia) -> Cleanse(magdaia, nady))\nforall x (Cleanse(x, magdaia) -> Cleanse(magdaia, nady))\nAuspicate(magdaia, nady) -> Auspicate(nady, magdaia)\nforall x (Motion(x, nady) and not Shot(nady) -> not Motion(x, magdaia))\nnot Cleanse(magdaia, nady) -> Shot(magdaia)\nMotion(nady, magdaia) and not Cleanse(nady, magdaia) -> Shot(magdaia)\n\nMotion(nady, magdaia)\n\nAuspicate(nady, magdaia) and forall x (Auspicate(x, magdaia) -> Cleanse(magdaia, nady)) -> therefore Cleanse(magdaia, nady) Cleanse(magdaia, nady) and forall x (Cleanse(x, nady) -> not Motion(nady, magdaia)) -> therefore not Motion(nady, magdaia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The marylin does not like the seamus. The seamus retrogress the marylin. If someone hatch the seamus then the seamus does not like the marylin. If someone retrogress the marylin then the marylin is not ceilinged. If someone retrogress the marylin then the marylin hatch the seamus. If someone hatch the marylin then the marylin hatch the seamus. If the marylin retrogress the seamus then the seamus retrogress the marylin. If someone misbehave the seamus and the seamus is not nominal then they do not like the marylin. If the marylin does not visit the seamus then the marylin is nominal. If the seamus misbehave the marylin and the seamus does not visit the marylin then the marylin is nominal. The marylin is not nominal.", "logic": "\nnot Misbehave(marylin, seamus)\nRetrogress(seamus, marylin)\nforall x (Hatch(x, seamus) -> not Misbehave(seamus, marylin))\nforall x (Retrogress(x, marylin) -> not Ceilinged(marylin))\nforall x (Retrogress(x, marylin) -> Hatch(marylin, seamus))\nforall x (Hatch(x, marylin) -> Hatch(marylin, seamus))\nRetrogress(marylin, seamus) -> Retrogress(seamus, marylin)\nforall x (Misbehave(x, seamus) and not Nominal(seamus) -> not Misbehave(x, marylin))\nnot Hatch(marylin, seamus) -> Nominal(marylin)\nMisbehave(seamus, marylin) and not Hatch(seamus, marylin) -> Nominal(marylin)\n\nnot Nominal(marylin)\n\nnot Hatch(marylin, seamus) -> Nominal(marylin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The frederica does not like the brandon. The brandon upgrade the frederica. If someone overarch the brandon then the brandon does not like the frederica. If someone upgrade the frederica then the frederica is not lxxxv. If someone upgrade the frederica then the frederica overarch the brandon. If someone overarch the frederica then the frederica overarch the brandon. If the frederica upgrade the brandon then the brandon upgrade the frederica. If someone respire the brandon and the brandon is not bantam then they do not like the frederica. If the frederica does not visit the brandon then the frederica is bantam. If the brandon respire the frederica and the brandon does not visit the frederica then the frederica is bantam. The brandon is rough.", "logic": "\nnot Respire(frederica, brandon)\nUpgrade(brandon, frederica)\nforall x (Overarch(x, brandon) -> not Respire(brandon, frederica))\nforall x (Upgrade(x, frederica) -> not Lxxxv(frederica))\nforall x (Upgrade(x, frederica) -> Overarch(frederica, brandon))\nforall x (Overarch(x, frederica) -> Overarch(frederica, brandon))\nUpgrade(frederica, brandon) -> Upgrade(brandon, frederica)\nforall x (Respire(x, brandon) and not Bantam(brandon) -> not Respire(x, frederica))\nnot Overarch(frederica, brandon) -> Bantam(frederica)\nRespire(brandon, frederica) and not Overarch(brandon, frederica) -> Bantam(frederica)\n\nRough(brandon)\n\nRough(brandon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The carla does not like the elisa. The elisa erupt the carla. If someone misaddress the elisa then the elisa does not like the carla. If someone erupt the carla then the carla is not adorned. If someone erupt the carla then the carla misaddress the elisa. If someone misaddress the carla then the carla misaddress the elisa. If the carla erupt the elisa then the elisa erupt the carla. If someone retrospect the elisa and the elisa is not nippy then they do not like the carla. If the carla does not visit the elisa then the carla is nippy. If the elisa retrospect the carla and the elisa does not visit the carla then the carla is nippy. The carla is not rough.", "logic": "\nnot Retrospect(carla, elisa)\nErupt(elisa, carla)\nforall x (Misaddress(x, elisa) -> not Retrospect(elisa, carla))\nforall x (Erupt(x, carla) -> not Adorned(carla))\nforall x (Erupt(x, carla) -> Misaddress(carla, elisa))\nforall x (Misaddress(x, carla) -> Misaddress(carla, elisa))\nErupt(carla, elisa) -> Erupt(elisa, carla)\nforall x (Retrospect(x, elisa) and not Nippy(elisa) -> not Retrospect(x, carla))\nnot Misaddress(carla, elisa) -> Nippy(carla)\nRetrospect(elisa, carla) and not Misaddress(elisa, carla) -> Nippy(carla)\n\nnot Rough(carla)\n\nnot Rough(carla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The judith does not like the agatha. The agatha dampen the judith. If someone pale the agatha then the agatha does not like the judith. If someone dampen the judith then the judith is not backstage. If someone dampen the judith then the judith pale the agatha. If someone pale the judith then the judith pale the agatha. If the judith dampen the agatha then the agatha dampen the judith. If someone pity the agatha and the agatha is not glamorous then they do not like the judith. If the judith does not visit the agatha then the judith is glamorous. If the agatha pity the judith and the agatha does not visit the judith then the judith is glamorous. The judith dampen the judith.", "logic": "\nnot Pity(judith, agatha)\nDampen(agatha, judith)\nforall x (Pale(x, agatha) -> not Pity(agatha, judith))\nforall x (Dampen(x, judith) -> not Backstage(judith))\nforall x (Dampen(x, judith) -> Pale(judith, agatha))\nforall x (Pale(x, judith) -> Pale(judith, agatha))\nDampen(judith, agatha) -> Dampen(agatha, judith)\nforall x (Pity(x, agatha) and not Glamorous(agatha) -> not Pity(x, judith))\nnot Pale(judith, agatha) -> Glamorous(judith)\nPity(agatha, judith) and not Pale(agatha, judith) -> Glamorous(judith)\n\nDampen(judith, judith)\n\nDampen(judith, judith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The barri does not like the dyann. The dyann train the barri. If someone groan the dyann then the dyann does not like the barri. If someone train the barri then the barri is not vicarious. If someone train the barri then the barri groan the dyann. If someone groan the barri then the barri groan the dyann. If the barri train the dyann then the dyann train the barri. If someone inculcate the dyann and the dyann is not inviolate then they do not like the barri. If the barri does not visit the dyann then the barri is inviolate. If the dyann inculcate the barri and the dyann does not visit the barri then the barri is inviolate. The dyann is not kind.", "logic": "\nnot Inculcate(barri, dyann)\nTrain(dyann, barri)\nforall x (Groan(x, dyann) -> not Inculcate(dyann, barri))\nforall x (Train(x, barri) -> not Vicarious(barri))\nforall x (Train(x, barri) -> Groan(barri, dyann))\nforall x (Groan(x, barri) -> Groan(barri, dyann))\nTrain(barri, dyann) -> Train(dyann, barri)\nforall x (Inculcate(x, dyann) and not Inviolate(dyann) -> not Inculcate(x, barri))\nnot Groan(barri, dyann) -> Inviolate(barri)\nInculcate(dyann, barri) and not Groan(dyann, barri) -> Inviolate(barri)\n\nnot Kind(dyann)\n\nnot Kind(dyann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The odysseus does not like the dania. The dania rehearse the odysseus. If someone condone the dania then the dania does not like the odysseus. If someone rehearse the odysseus then the odysseus is not admittable. If someone rehearse the odysseus then the odysseus condone the dania. If someone condone the odysseus then the odysseus condone the dania. If the odysseus rehearse the dania then the dania rehearse the odysseus. If someone torch the dania and the dania is not detested then they do not like the odysseus. If the odysseus does not visit the dania then the odysseus is detested. If the dania torch the odysseus and the dania does not visit the odysseus then the odysseus is detested. The dania rehearse the dania.", "logic": "\nnot Torch(odysseus, dania)\nRehearse(dania, odysseus)\nforall x (Condone(x, dania) -> not Torch(dania, odysseus))\nforall x (Rehearse(x, odysseus) -> not Admittable(odysseus))\nforall x (Rehearse(x, odysseus) -> Condone(odysseus, dania))\nforall x (Condone(x, odysseus) -> Condone(odysseus, dania))\nRehearse(odysseus, dania) -> Rehearse(dania, odysseus)\nforall x (Torch(x, dania) and not Detested(dania) -> not Torch(x, odysseus))\nnot Condone(odysseus, dania) -> Detested(odysseus)\nTorch(dania, odysseus) and not Condone(dania, odysseus) -> Detested(odysseus)\n\nRehearse(dania, dania)\n\nRehearse(dania, dania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The ree disenchant the raymund. The raymund delve the ree. If the ree disenchant the raymund and the raymund dethaw the ree then the raymund is unaware. If the raymund disenchant the ree and the raymund is ninth then the raymund is invitatory. If something disenchant the ree then the ree disenchant the raymund. If something dethaw the ree then the ree disenchant the raymund. If something disenchant the ree then it does not chase the raymund. If something is invitatory and it disenchant the ree then it is liplike. If something disenchant the ree and it delve the raymund then the ree does not visit the raymund. If something disenchant the raymund then the raymund dethaw the ree. The ree disenchant the raymund.", "logic": "\nDisenchant(ree, raymund)\nDelve(raymund, ree)\nDisenchant(ree, raymund) and Dethaw(raymund, ree) -> Unaware(raymund)\nDisenchant(raymund, ree) and Ninth(raymund) -> Invitatory(raymund)\nforall x (Disenchant(x, ree) -> Disenchant(ree, raymund))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, ree) -> Disenchant(ree, raymund))\nforall x (Disenchant(x, ree) -> not Disenchant(x, raymund))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) and Disenchant(x, ree) -> Liplike(x))\nforall x (Disenchant(x, ree) and Delve(x, raymund) -> not Delve(ree, raymund))\nforall x (Disenchant(x, raymund) -> Dethaw(raymund, ree))\n\nDisenchant(ree, raymund)\n\ntherefore Disenchant(ree, raymund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The nari carjack the englebert. The englebert sacrifice the nari. If the nari carjack the englebert and the englebert unarm the nari then the englebert is coetaneous. If the englebert carjack the nari and the englebert is indecent then the englebert is hermitic. If something carjack the nari then the nari carjack the englebert. If something unarm the nari then the nari carjack the englebert. If something carjack the nari then it does not chase the englebert. If something is hermitic and it carjack the nari then it is avionic. If something carjack the nari and it sacrifice the englebert then the nari does not visit the englebert. If something carjack the englebert then the englebert unarm the nari. The nari does not chase the englebert.", "logic": "\nCarjack(nari, englebert)\nSacrifice(englebert, nari)\nCarjack(nari, englebert) and Unarm(englebert, nari) -> Coetaneous(englebert)\nCarjack(englebert, nari) and Indecent(englebert) -> Hermitic(englebert)\nforall x (Carjack(x, nari) -> Carjack(nari, englebert))\nforall x (Unarm(x, nari) -> Carjack(nari, englebert))\nforall x (Carjack(x, nari) -> not Carjack(x, englebert))\nforall x (Hermitic(x) and Carjack(x, nari) -> Avionic(x))\nforall x (Carjack(x, nari) and Sacrifice(x, englebert) -> not Sacrifice(nari, englebert))\nforall x (Carjack(x, englebert) -> Unarm(englebert, nari))\n\nnot Carjack(nari, englebert)\n\ntherefore Carjack(nari, englebert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The janice stride the lisbeth. The lisbeth resolve the janice. If the janice stride the lisbeth and the lisbeth citrate the janice then the lisbeth is impatient. If the lisbeth stride the janice and the lisbeth is frivolous then the lisbeth is homophobic. If something stride the janice then the janice stride the lisbeth. If something citrate the janice then the janice stride the lisbeth. If something stride the janice then it does not chase the lisbeth. If something is homophobic and it stride the janice then it is ungentle. If something stride the janice and it resolve the lisbeth then the janice does not visit the lisbeth. If something stride the lisbeth then the lisbeth citrate the janice. The lisbeth citrate the janice.", "logic": "\nStride(janice, lisbeth)\nResolve(lisbeth, janice)\nStride(janice, lisbeth) and Citrate(lisbeth, janice) -> Impatient(lisbeth)\nStride(lisbeth, janice) and Frivolous(lisbeth) -> Homophobic(lisbeth)\nforall x (Stride(x, janice) -> Stride(janice, lisbeth))\nforall x (Citrate(x, janice) -> Stride(janice, lisbeth))\nforall x (Stride(x, janice) -> not Stride(x, lisbeth))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) and Stride(x, janice) -> Ungentle(x))\nforall x (Stride(x, janice) and Resolve(x, lisbeth) -> not Resolve(janice, lisbeth))\nforall x (Stride(x, lisbeth) -> Citrate(lisbeth, janice))\n\nCitrate(lisbeth, janice)\n\nStride(janice, lisbeth) and forall x (Stride(x, lisbeth) -> Citrate(lisbeth, janice)) -> therefore Citrate(lisbeth, janice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The dmitri allot the isidore. The isidore torch the dmitri. If the dmitri allot the isidore and the isidore groin the dmitri then the isidore is beaten. If the isidore allot the dmitri and the isidore is boxed then the isidore is ordinary. If something allot the dmitri then the dmitri allot the isidore. If something groin the dmitri then the dmitri allot the isidore. If something allot the dmitri then it does not chase the isidore. If something is ordinary and it allot the dmitri then it is uninominal. If something allot the dmitri and it torch the isidore then the dmitri does not visit the isidore. If something allot the isidore then the isidore groin the dmitri. The isidore does not like the dmitri.", "logic": "\nAllot(dmitri, isidore)\nTorch(isidore, dmitri)\nAllot(dmitri, isidore) and Groin(isidore, dmitri) -> Beaten(isidore)\nAllot(isidore, dmitri) and Boxed(isidore) -> Ordinary(isidore)\nforall x (Allot(x, dmitri) -> Allot(dmitri, isidore))\nforall x (Groin(x, dmitri) -> Allot(dmitri, isidore))\nforall x (Allot(x, dmitri) -> not Allot(x, isidore))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) and Allot(x, dmitri) -> Uninominal(x))\nforall x (Allot(x, dmitri) and Torch(x, isidore) -> not Torch(dmitri, isidore))\nforall x (Allot(x, isidore) -> Groin(isidore, dmitri))\n\nnot Groin(isidore, dmitri)\n\nAllot(dmitri, isidore) and forall x (Allot(x, isidore) -> Groin(isidore, dmitri)) -> therefore Groin(isidore, dmitri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The emmey finger the berte. The berte neuter the emmey. If the emmey finger the berte and the berte qualify the emmey then the berte is civil. If the berte finger the emmey and the berte is amygdaloid then the berte is climatic. If something finger the emmey then the emmey finger the berte. If something qualify the emmey then the emmey finger the berte. If something finger the emmey then it does not chase the berte. If something is climatic and it finger the emmey then it is obligated. If something finger the emmey and it neuter the berte then the emmey does not visit the berte. If something finger the berte then the berte qualify the emmey. The berte is civil.", "logic": "\nFinger(emmey, berte)\nNeuter(berte, emmey)\nFinger(emmey, berte) and Qualify(berte, emmey) -> Civil(berte)\nFinger(berte, emmey) and Amygdaloid(berte) -> Climatic(berte)\nforall x (Finger(x, emmey) -> Finger(emmey, berte))\nforall x (Qualify(x, emmey) -> Finger(emmey, berte))\nforall x (Finger(x, emmey) -> not Finger(x, berte))\nforall x (Climatic(x) and Finger(x, emmey) -> Obligated(x))\nforall x (Finger(x, emmey) and Neuter(x, berte) -> not Neuter(emmey, berte))\nforall x (Finger(x, berte) -> Qualify(berte, emmey))\n\nCivil(berte)\n\nFinger(emmey, berte) and forall x (Finger(x, berte) -> Qualify(berte, emmey)) -> therefore Qualify(berte, emmey) Finger(emmey, berte) and Qualify(berte, emmey) and Finger(emmey, berte) and Qualify(berte, emmey) -> Civil(berte) -> therefore Civil(berte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The maegan flinch the adams. The adams cybernate the maegan. If the maegan flinch the adams and the adams unbraid the maegan then the adams is convinced. If the adams flinch the maegan and the adams is bivalved then the adams is filar. If something flinch the maegan then the maegan flinch the adams. If something unbraid the maegan then the maegan flinch the adams. If something flinch the maegan then it does not chase the adams. If something is filar and it flinch the maegan then it is axiomatic. If something flinch the maegan and it cybernate the adams then the maegan does not visit the adams. If something flinch the adams then the adams unbraid the maegan. The adams is not convinced.", "logic": "\nFlinch(maegan, adams)\nCybernate(adams, maegan)\nFlinch(maegan, adams) and Unbraid(adams, maegan) -> Convinced(adams)\nFlinch(adams, maegan) and Bivalved(adams) -> Filar(adams)\nforall x (Flinch(x, maegan) -> Flinch(maegan, adams))\nforall x (Unbraid(x, maegan) -> Flinch(maegan, adams))\nforall x (Flinch(x, maegan) -> not Flinch(x, adams))\nforall x (Filar(x) and Flinch(x, maegan) -> Axiomatic(x))\nforall x (Flinch(x, maegan) and Cybernate(x, adams) -> not Cybernate(maegan, adams))\nforall x (Flinch(x, adams) -> Unbraid(adams, maegan))\n\nnot Convinced(adams)\n\nFlinch(maegan, adams) and forall x (Flinch(x, adams) -> Unbraid(adams, maegan)) -> therefore Unbraid(adams, maegan) Flinch(maegan, adams) and Unbraid(adams, maegan) and Flinch(maegan, adams) and Unbraid(adams, maegan) -> Convinced(adams) -> therefore Convinced(adams)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The emily hiss the gordan. The gordan pinkify the emily. If the emily hiss the gordan and the gordan plasticise the emily then the gordan is univocal. If the gordan hiss the emily and the gordan is awry then the gordan is giving. If something hiss the emily then the emily hiss the gordan. If something plasticise the emily then the emily hiss the gordan. If something hiss the emily then it does not chase the gordan. If something is giving and it hiss the emily then it is gastric. If something hiss the emily and it pinkify the gordan then the emily does not visit the gordan. If something hiss the gordan then the gordan plasticise the emily. The gordan is not gastric.", "logic": "\nHiss(emily, gordan)\nPinkify(gordan, emily)\nHiss(emily, gordan) and Plasticise(gordan, emily) -> Univocal(gordan)\nHiss(gordan, emily) and Awry(gordan) -> Giving(gordan)\nforall x (Hiss(x, emily) -> Hiss(emily, gordan))\nforall x (Plasticise(x, emily) -> Hiss(emily, gordan))\nforall x (Hiss(x, emily) -> not Hiss(x, gordan))\nforall x (Giving(x) and Hiss(x, emily) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Hiss(x, emily) and Pinkify(x, gordan) -> not Pinkify(emily, gordan))\nforall x (Hiss(x, gordan) -> Plasticise(gordan, emily))\n\nnot Gastric(gordan)\n\nforall x (Giving(x) and Hiss(x, emily) -> Gastric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The therese splatter the dillon. The dillon fence the therese. If the therese splatter the dillon and the dillon imbricate the therese then the dillon is fleshy. If the dillon splatter the therese and the dillon is stripy then the dillon is untiring. If something splatter the therese then the therese splatter the dillon. If something imbricate the therese then the therese splatter the dillon. If something splatter the therese then it does not chase the dillon. If something is untiring and it splatter the therese then it is bawdy. If something splatter the therese and it fence the dillon then the therese does not visit the dillon. If something splatter the dillon then the dillon imbricate the therese. The therese is bawdy.", "logic": "\nSplatter(therese, dillon)\nFence(dillon, therese)\nSplatter(therese, dillon) and Imbricate(dillon, therese) -> Fleshy(dillon)\nSplatter(dillon, therese) and Stripy(dillon) -> Untiring(dillon)\nforall x (Splatter(x, therese) -> Splatter(therese, dillon))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, therese) -> Splatter(therese, dillon))\nforall x (Splatter(x, therese) -> not Splatter(x, dillon))\nforall x (Untiring(x) and Splatter(x, therese) -> Bawdy(x))\nforall x (Splatter(x, therese) and Fence(x, dillon) -> not Fence(therese, dillon))\nforall x (Splatter(x, dillon) -> Imbricate(dillon, therese))\n\nBawdy(therese)\n\nforall x (Untiring(x) and Splatter(x, therese) -> Bawdy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The sharl diffract the adeline. The adeline pussyfoot the sharl. If the sharl diffract the adeline and the adeline stint the sharl then the adeline is thawed. If the adeline diffract the sharl and the adeline is dioestrous then the adeline is satisfying. If something diffract the sharl then the sharl diffract the adeline. If something stint the sharl then the sharl diffract the adeline. If something diffract the sharl then it does not chase the adeline. If something is satisfying and it diffract the sharl then it is amicable. If something diffract the sharl and it pussyfoot the adeline then the sharl does not visit the adeline. If something diffract the adeline then the adeline stint the sharl. The adeline is not satisfying.", "logic": "\nDiffract(sharl, adeline)\nPussyfoot(adeline, sharl)\nDiffract(sharl, adeline) and Stint(adeline, sharl) -> Thawed(adeline)\nDiffract(adeline, sharl) and Dioestrous(adeline) -> Satisfying(adeline)\nforall x (Diffract(x, sharl) -> Diffract(sharl, adeline))\nforall x (Stint(x, sharl) -> Diffract(sharl, adeline))\nforall x (Diffract(x, sharl) -> not Diffract(x, adeline))\nforall x (Satisfying(x) and Diffract(x, sharl) -> Amicable(x))\nforall x (Diffract(x, sharl) and Pussyfoot(x, adeline) -> not Pussyfoot(sharl, adeline))\nforall x (Diffract(x, adeline) -> Stint(adeline, sharl))\n\nnot Satisfying(adeline)\n\nDiffract(adeline, sharl) and Dioestrous(adeline) -> Satisfying(adeline) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The abraham gray the durward. The durward analyse the abraham. If the abraham gray the durward and the durward westernise the abraham then the durward is median. If the durward gray the abraham and the durward is careless then the durward is ladened. If something gray the abraham then the abraham gray the durward. If something westernise the abraham then the abraham gray the durward. If something gray the abraham then it does not chase the durward. If something is ladened and it gray the abraham then it is symmetric. If something gray the abraham and it analyse the durward then the abraham does not visit the durward. If something gray the durward then the durward westernise the abraham. The abraham is median.", "logic": "\nGray(abraham, durward)\nAnalyse(durward, abraham)\nGray(abraham, durward) and Westernise(durward, abraham) -> Median(durward)\nGray(durward, abraham) and Careless(durward) -> Ladened(durward)\nforall x (Gray(x, abraham) -> Gray(abraham, durward))\nforall x (Westernise(x, abraham) -> Gray(abraham, durward))\nforall x (Gray(x, abraham) -> not Gray(x, durward))\nforall x (Ladened(x) and Gray(x, abraham) -> Symmetric(x))\nforall x (Gray(x, abraham) and Analyse(x, durward) -> not Analyse(abraham, durward))\nforall x (Gray(x, durward) -> Westernise(durward, abraham))\n\nMedian(abraham)\n\nMedian(abraham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The idell bypass the wendi. The wendi enumerate the idell. If the idell bypass the wendi and the wendi ridicule the idell then the wendi is bigmouthed. If the wendi bypass the idell and the wendi is rolled then the wendi is precatory. If something bypass the idell then the idell bypass the wendi. If something ridicule the idell then the idell bypass the wendi. If something bypass the idell then it does not chase the wendi. If something is precatory and it bypass the idell then it is ohmic. If something bypass the idell and it enumerate the wendi then the idell does not visit the wendi. If something bypass the wendi then the wendi ridicule the idell. The idell does not visit the idell.", "logic": "\nBypass(idell, wendi)\nEnumerate(wendi, idell)\nBypass(idell, wendi) and Ridicule(wendi, idell) -> Bigmouthed(wendi)\nBypass(wendi, idell) and Rolled(wendi) -> Precatory(wendi)\nforall x (Bypass(x, idell) -> Bypass(idell, wendi))\nforall x (Ridicule(x, idell) -> Bypass(idell, wendi))\nforall x (Bypass(x, idell) -> not Bypass(x, wendi))\nforall x (Precatory(x) and Bypass(x, idell) -> Ohmic(x))\nforall x (Bypass(x, idell) and Enumerate(x, wendi) -> not Enumerate(idell, wendi))\nforall x (Bypass(x, wendi) -> Ridicule(wendi, idell))\n\nnot Enumerate(idell, idell)\n\nnot Enumerate(idell, idell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "The eldon ingratiate the cicily. The cicily immingle the eldon. If the eldon ingratiate the cicily and the cicily conquer the eldon then the cicily is opaque. If the cicily ingratiate the eldon and the cicily is auburn then the cicily is iberian. If something ingratiate the eldon then the eldon ingratiate the cicily. If something conquer the eldon then the eldon ingratiate the cicily. If something ingratiate the eldon then it does not chase the cicily. If something is iberian and it ingratiate the eldon then it is unkept. If something ingratiate the eldon and it immingle the cicily then the eldon does not visit the cicily. If something ingratiate the cicily then the cicily conquer the eldon. The eldon is auburn.", "logic": "\nIngratiate(eldon, cicily)\nImmingle(cicily, eldon)\nIngratiate(eldon, cicily) and Conquer(cicily, eldon) -> Opaque(cicily)\nIngratiate(cicily, eldon) and Auburn(cicily) -> Iberian(cicily)\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, eldon) -> Ingratiate(eldon, cicily))\nforall x (Conquer(x, eldon) -> Ingratiate(eldon, cicily))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, eldon) -> not Ingratiate(x, cicily))\nforall x (Iberian(x) and Ingratiate(x, eldon) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, eldon) and Immingle(x, cicily) -> not Immingle(eldon, cicily))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, cicily) -> Conquer(cicily, eldon))\n\nAuburn(eldon)\n\nAuburn(eldon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-928"} {"premises": "Dean is widespread. Dean is incertain. Dean is doting. Dean is unfearing. Florinda is doting. Florinda is unbalanced. Florinda is unfearing. All unfearing, incertain things are xlvii. All widespread, airworthy things are unbalanced. All unbalanced things are xlvii. Red, unfearing things are xlvii. Nice, xlvii things are widespread. If Dean is widespread and Dean is airworthy then Dean is unbalanced. All airworthy, unfearing things are unbalanced. All unbalanced, doting things are airworthy. Florinda is doting.", "logic": "\nWidespread(dean)\nIncertain(dean)\nDoting(dean)\nUnfearing(dean)\nDoting(florinda)\nUnbalanced(florinda)\nUnfearing(florinda)\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Incertain(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Widespread(x) and Airworthy(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Doting(x) and Xlvii(x) -> Widespread(x))\nWidespread(dean) and Airworthy(dean) -> Unbalanced(dean)\nforall x (Airworthy(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) and Doting(x) -> Airworthy(x))\n\nDoting(florinda)\n\ntherefore Doting(florinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Latrina is maltreated. Latrina is distant. Latrina is croatian. Latrina is tritanopic. Lina is croatian. Lina is nibbed. Lina is tritanopic. All tritanopic, distant things are lightsome. All maltreated, fecal things are nibbed. All nibbed things are lightsome. Red, tritanopic things are lightsome. Nice, lightsome things are maltreated. If Latrina is maltreated and Latrina is fecal then Latrina is nibbed. All fecal, tritanopic things are nibbed. All nibbed, croatian things are fecal. Latrina is not croatian.", "logic": "\nMaltreated(latrina)\nDistant(latrina)\nCroatian(latrina)\nTritanopic(latrina)\nCroatian(lina)\nNibbed(lina)\nTritanopic(lina)\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) and Distant(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Maltreated(x) and Fecal(x) -> Nibbed(x))\nforall x (Nibbed(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Nibbed(x) and Tritanopic(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Croatian(x) and Lightsome(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nMaltreated(latrina) and Fecal(latrina) -> Nibbed(latrina)\nforall x (Fecal(x) and Tritanopic(x) -> Nibbed(x))\nforall x (Nibbed(x) and Croatian(x) -> Fecal(x))\n\nnot Croatian(latrina)\n\ntherefore Croatian(latrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Rebbecca is hick. Rebbecca is unsealed. Rebbecca is squiggly. Rebbecca is studded. Whittaker is squiggly. Whittaker is tramontane. Whittaker is studded. All studded, unsealed things are vermiform. All hick, dour things are tramontane. All tramontane things are vermiform. Red, studded things are vermiform. Nice, vermiform things are hick. If Rebbecca is hick and Rebbecca is dour then Rebbecca is tramontane. All dour, studded things are tramontane. All tramontane, squiggly things are dour. Rebbecca is vermiform.", "logic": "\nHick(rebbecca)\nUnsealed(rebbecca)\nSquiggly(rebbecca)\nStudded(rebbecca)\nSquiggly(whittaker)\nTramontane(whittaker)\nStudded(whittaker)\nforall x (Studded(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Vermiform(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) and Dour(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> Vermiform(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) and Studded(x) -> Vermiform(x))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) and Vermiform(x) -> Hick(x))\nHick(rebbecca) and Dour(rebbecca) -> Tramontane(rebbecca)\nforall x (Dour(x) and Studded(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) and Squiggly(x) -> Dour(x))\n\nVermiform(rebbecca)\n\nStudded(rebbecca) and Unsealed(rebbecca) and forall x (Studded(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Vermiform(x)) -> therefore Vermiform(rebbecca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Libbi is ascosporic. Libbi is jewish. Libbi is pantropic. Libbi is allegiant. Rhea is pantropic. Rhea is blustering. Rhea is allegiant. All allegiant, jewish things are unruffled. All ascosporic, intuitive things are blustering. All blustering things are unruffled. Red, allegiant things are unruffled. Nice, unruffled things are ascosporic. If Libbi is ascosporic and Libbi is intuitive then Libbi is blustering. All intuitive, allegiant things are blustering. All blustering, pantropic things are intuitive. Libbi is not unruffled.", "logic": "\nAscosporic(libbi)\nJewish(libbi)\nPantropic(libbi)\nAllegiant(libbi)\nPantropic(rhea)\nBlustering(rhea)\nAllegiant(rhea)\nforall x (Allegiant(x) and Jewish(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Ascosporic(x) and Intuitive(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) and Allegiant(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Pantropic(x) and Unruffled(x) -> Ascosporic(x))\nAscosporic(libbi) and Intuitive(libbi) -> Blustering(libbi)\nforall x (Intuitive(x) and Allegiant(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) and Pantropic(x) -> Intuitive(x))\n\nnot Unruffled(libbi)\n\nAllegiant(libbi) and Jewish(libbi) and forall x (Allegiant(x) and Jewish(x) -> Unruffled(x)) -> therefore Unruffled(libbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Rutger is prostrate. Rutger is anticlinal. Rutger is spineless. Rutger is listed. Idaline is spineless. Idaline is vernal. Idaline is listed. All listed, anticlinal things are jewelled. All prostrate, denatured things are vernal. All vernal things are jewelled. Red, listed things are jewelled. Nice, jewelled things are prostrate. If Rutger is prostrate and Rutger is denatured then Rutger is vernal. All denatured, listed things are vernal. All vernal, spineless things are denatured. Idaline is prostrate.", "logic": "\nProstrate(rutger)\nAnticlinal(rutger)\nSpineless(rutger)\nListed(rutger)\nSpineless(idaline)\nVernal(idaline)\nListed(idaline)\nforall x (Listed(x) and Anticlinal(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nforall x (Prostrate(x) and Denatured(x) -> Vernal(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) and Listed(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Prostrate(x))\nProstrate(rutger) and Denatured(rutger) -> Vernal(rutger)\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Listed(x) -> Vernal(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) and Spineless(x) -> Denatured(x))\n\nProstrate(idaline)\n\nVernal(idaline) and forall x (Vernal(x) -> Jewelled(x)) -> therefore Jewelled(idaline) Spineless(idaline) and Jewelled(idaline) and forall x (Spineless(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Prostrate(x)) -> therefore Prostrate(idaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Nahum is unshackled. Nahum is powered. Nahum is respected. Nahum is blasting. Casia is respected. Casia is loveable. Casia is blasting. All blasting, powered things are tinned. All unshackled, megascopic things are loveable. All loveable things are tinned. Red, blasting things are tinned. Nice, tinned things are unshackled. If Nahum is unshackled and Nahum is megascopic then Nahum is loveable. All megascopic, blasting things are loveable. All loveable, respected things are megascopic. Casia is not unshackled.", "logic": "\nUnshackled(nahum)\nPowered(nahum)\nRespected(nahum)\nBlasting(nahum)\nRespected(casia)\nLoveable(casia)\nBlasting(casia)\nforall x (Blasting(x) and Powered(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Unshackled(x) and Megascopic(x) -> Loveable(x))\nforall x (Loveable(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Loveable(x) and Blasting(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) and Tinned(x) -> Unshackled(x))\nUnshackled(nahum) and Megascopic(nahum) -> Loveable(nahum)\nforall x (Megascopic(x) and Blasting(x) -> Loveable(x))\nforall x (Loveable(x) and Respected(x) -> Megascopic(x))\n\nnot Unshackled(casia)\n\nLoveable(casia) and forall x (Loveable(x) -> Tinned(x)) -> therefore Tinned(casia) Respected(casia) and Tinned(casia) and forall x (Respected(x) and Tinned(x) -> Unshackled(x)) -> therefore Unshackled(casia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Chad is belarusian. Chad is potent. Chad is subsidised. Chad is fearless. Bridgett is subsidised. Bridgett is unartistic. Bridgett is fearless. All fearless, potent things are reserved. All belarusian, nonpolar things are unartistic. All unartistic things are reserved. Red, fearless things are reserved. Nice, reserved things are belarusian. If Chad is belarusian and Chad is nonpolar then Chad is unartistic. All nonpolar, fearless things are unartistic. All unartistic, subsidised things are nonpolar. Chad is not nonpolar.", "logic": "\nBelarusian(chad)\nPotent(chad)\nSubsidised(chad)\nFearless(chad)\nSubsidised(bridgett)\nUnartistic(bridgett)\nFearless(bridgett)\nforall x (Fearless(x) and Potent(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Belarusian(x) and Nonpolar(x) -> Unartistic(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and Fearless(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Reserved(x) -> Belarusian(x))\nBelarusian(chad) and Nonpolar(chad) -> Unartistic(chad)\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) and Fearless(x) -> Unartistic(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and Subsidised(x) -> Nonpolar(x))\n\nnot Nonpolar(chad)\n\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and Subsidised(x) -> Nonpolar(x)) <- forall x (Belarusian(x) and Nonpolar(x) -> Unartistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Weslie is uncurved. Weslie is famed. Weslie is rousseauan. Weslie is disyllabic. Harlan is rousseauan. Harlan is unsatiable. Harlan is disyllabic. All disyllabic, famed things are favorite. All uncurved, argive things are unsatiable. All unsatiable things are favorite. Red, disyllabic things are favorite. Nice, favorite things are uncurved. If Weslie is uncurved and Weslie is argive then Weslie is unsatiable. All argive, disyllabic things are unsatiable. All unsatiable, rousseauan things are argive. Weslie is unsatiable.", "logic": "\nUncurved(weslie)\nFamed(weslie)\nRousseauan(weslie)\nDisyllabic(weslie)\nRousseauan(harlan)\nUnsatiable(harlan)\nDisyllabic(harlan)\nforall x (Disyllabic(x) and Famed(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Uncurved(x) and Argive(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) and Disyllabic(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) and Favorite(x) -> Uncurved(x))\nUncurved(weslie) and Argive(weslie) -> Unsatiable(weslie)\nforall x (Argive(x) and Disyllabic(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) and Rousseauan(x) -> Argive(x))\n\nUnsatiable(weslie)\n\nforall x (Uncurved(x) and Argive(x) -> Unsatiable(x)) <- forall x (Unsatiable(x) and Rousseauan(x) -> Argive(x)) <- Uncurved(weslie) and Argive(weslie) -> Unsatiable(weslie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Daphne is wizard. Daphne is cometary. Daphne is pyrogenous. Daphne is slack. Flore is privy. Jasper is approving. Jasper is cometary. Jasper is pyrogenous. Jasper is privy. Jasper is slack. Young, wizard things are approving. If Jasper is privy then Jasper is wizard. All unladylike things are approving. If something is slack and unladylike then it is approving. If something is slack then it is unladylike. If something is privy then it is unladylike. Daphne is wizard.", "logic": "\nWizard(daphne)\nCometary(daphne)\nPyrogenous(daphne)\nSlack(daphne)\nPrivy(flore)\nApproving(jasper)\nCometary(jasper)\nPyrogenous(jasper)\nPrivy(jasper)\nSlack(jasper)\nforall x (Slack(x) and Wizard(x) -> Approving(x))\nPrivy(jasper) -> Wizard(jasper)\nforall x (Unladylike(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Slack(x) and Unladylike(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Slack(x) -> Unladylike(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) -> Unladylike(x))\n\nWizard(daphne)\n\ntherefore Wizard(daphne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Jenica is ischemic. Jenica is unmanful. Jenica is malay. Jenica is unasked. Leigh is figurative. Matteo is hexagonal. Matteo is unmanful. Matteo is malay. Matteo is figurative. Matteo is unasked. Young, ischemic things are hexagonal. If Matteo is figurative then Matteo is ischemic. All amnic things are hexagonal. If something is unasked and amnic then it is hexagonal. If something is unasked then it is amnic. If something is figurative then it is amnic. Jenica is not malay.", "logic": "\nIschemic(jenica)\nUnmanful(jenica)\nMalay(jenica)\nUnasked(jenica)\nFigurative(leigh)\nHexagonal(matteo)\nUnmanful(matteo)\nMalay(matteo)\nFigurative(matteo)\nUnasked(matteo)\nforall x (Unasked(x) and Ischemic(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nFigurative(matteo) -> Ischemic(matteo)\nforall x (Amnic(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Unasked(x) and Amnic(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Unasked(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Amnic(x))\n\nnot Malay(jenica)\n\ntherefore Malay(jenica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Rosaline is copular. Rosaline is narrowed. Rosaline is chafflike. Rosaline is ellipsoid. Sheila is glottal. Anny is accurate. Anny is narrowed. Anny is chafflike. Anny is glottal. Anny is ellipsoid. Young, copular things are accurate. If Anny is glottal then Anny is copular. All bugged things are accurate. If something is ellipsoid and bugged then it is accurate. If something is ellipsoid then it is bugged. If something is glottal then it is bugged. Rosaline is accurate.", "logic": "\nCopular(rosaline)\nNarrowed(rosaline)\nChafflike(rosaline)\nEllipsoid(rosaline)\nGlottal(sheila)\nAccurate(anny)\nNarrowed(anny)\nChafflike(anny)\nGlottal(anny)\nEllipsoid(anny)\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Copular(x) -> Accurate(x))\nGlottal(anny) -> Copular(anny)\nforall x (Bugged(x) -> Accurate(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Bugged(x) -> Accurate(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> Bugged(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Bugged(x))\n\nAccurate(rosaline)\n\nEllipsoid(rosaline) and Copular(rosaline) and forall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Copular(x) -> Accurate(x)) -> therefore Accurate(rosaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Garvy is solved. Garvy is mitigated. Garvy is ranking. Garvy is medullary. Eveleen is penurious. Andi is aromatic. Andi is mitigated. Andi is ranking. Andi is penurious. Andi is medullary. Young, solved things are aromatic. If Andi is penurious then Andi is solved. All highborn things are aromatic. If something is medullary and highborn then it is aromatic. If something is medullary then it is highborn. If something is penurious then it is highborn. Garvy is not aromatic.", "logic": "\nSolved(garvy)\nMitigated(garvy)\nRanking(garvy)\nMedullary(garvy)\nPenurious(eveleen)\nAromatic(andi)\nMitigated(andi)\nRanking(andi)\nPenurious(andi)\nMedullary(andi)\nforall x (Medullary(x) and Solved(x) -> Aromatic(x))\nPenurious(andi) -> Solved(andi)\nforall x (Highborn(x) -> Aromatic(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) and Highborn(x) -> Aromatic(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) -> Highborn(x))\nforall x (Penurious(x) -> Highborn(x))\n\nnot Aromatic(garvy)\n\nMedullary(garvy) and Solved(garvy) and forall x (Medullary(x) and Solved(x) -> Aromatic(x)) -> therefore Aromatic(garvy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Janka is contorted. Janka is messianic. Janka is vestiary. Janka is sickly. Connie is saponified. Anabella is transeunt. Anabella is messianic. Anabella is vestiary. Anabella is saponified. Anabella is sickly. Young, contorted things are transeunt. If Anabella is saponified then Anabella is contorted. All rising things are transeunt. If something is sickly and rising then it is transeunt. If something is sickly then it is rising. If something is saponified then it is rising. Connie is transeunt.", "logic": "\nContorted(janka)\nMessianic(janka)\nVestiary(janka)\nSickly(janka)\nSaponified(connie)\nTranseunt(anabella)\nMessianic(anabella)\nVestiary(anabella)\nSaponified(anabella)\nSickly(anabella)\nforall x (Sickly(x) and Contorted(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nSaponified(anabella) -> Contorted(anabella)\nforall x (Rising(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nforall x (Sickly(x) and Rising(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nforall x (Sickly(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Saponified(x) -> Rising(x))\n\nTranseunt(connie)\n\nSaponified(connie) and forall x (Saponified(x) -> Rising(x)) -> therefore Rising(connie) Rising(connie) and forall x (Rising(x) -> Transeunt(x)) -> therefore Transeunt(connie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Aphrodite is isometric. Aphrodite is bedfast. Aphrodite is hired. Aphrodite is axenic. Sydelle is pretorian. Betta is unstinted. Betta is bedfast. Betta is hired. Betta is pretorian. Betta is axenic. Young, isometric things are unstinted. If Betta is pretorian then Betta is isometric. All japanese things are unstinted. If something is axenic and japanese then it is unstinted. If something is axenic then it is japanese. If something is pretorian then it is japanese. Sydelle is not unstinted.", "logic": "\nIsometric(aphrodite)\nBedfast(aphrodite)\nHired(aphrodite)\nAxenic(aphrodite)\nPretorian(sydelle)\nUnstinted(betta)\nBedfast(betta)\nHired(betta)\nPretorian(betta)\nAxenic(betta)\nforall x (Axenic(x) and Isometric(x) -> Unstinted(x))\nPretorian(betta) -> Isometric(betta)\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> Unstinted(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) and Japanese(x) -> Unstinted(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Pretorian(x) -> Japanese(x))\n\nnot Unstinted(sydelle)\n\nPretorian(sydelle) and forall x (Pretorian(x) -> Japanese(x)) -> therefore Japanese(sydelle) Japanese(sydelle) and forall x (Japanese(x) -> Unstinted(x)) -> therefore Unstinted(sydelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Sterling is fabricated. Sterling is economic. Sterling is comate. Sterling is untold. Stephie is greedy. Vassili is lovable. Vassili is economic. Vassili is comate. Vassili is greedy. Vassili is untold. Young, fabricated things are lovable. If Vassili is greedy then Vassili is fabricated. All insanitary things are lovable. If something is untold and insanitary then it is lovable. If something is untold then it is insanitary. If something is greedy then it is insanitary. Sterling is not greedy.", "logic": "\nFabricated(sterling)\nEconomic(sterling)\nComate(sterling)\nUntold(sterling)\nGreedy(stephie)\nLovable(vassili)\nEconomic(vassili)\nComate(vassili)\nGreedy(vassili)\nUntold(vassili)\nforall x (Untold(x) and Fabricated(x) -> Lovable(x))\nGreedy(vassili) -> Fabricated(vassili)\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) and Insanitary(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Insanitary(x))\nforall x (Greedy(x) -> Insanitary(x))\n\nnot Greedy(sterling)\n\nnot Greedy(sterling) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Davide is muted. Davide is unmown. Davide is palatable. Davide is distracted. Manuel is archaistic. Chaddy is heraldist. Chaddy is unmown. Chaddy is palatable. Chaddy is archaistic. Chaddy is distracted. Young, muted things are heraldist. If Chaddy is archaistic then Chaddy is muted. All leechlike things are heraldist. If something is distracted and leechlike then it is heraldist. If something is distracted then it is leechlike. If something is archaistic then it is leechlike. Manuel is distracted.", "logic": "\nMuted(davide)\nUnmown(davide)\nPalatable(davide)\nDistracted(davide)\nArchaistic(manuel)\nHeraldist(chaddy)\nUnmown(chaddy)\nPalatable(chaddy)\nArchaistic(chaddy)\nDistracted(chaddy)\nforall x (Distracted(x) and Muted(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nArchaistic(chaddy) -> Muted(chaddy)\nforall x (Leechlike(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) and Leechlike(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Archaistic(x) -> Leechlike(x))\n\nDistracted(manuel)\n\nDistracted(manuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Izaak is leaflike. Izaak is atrial. Izaak is intended. Izaak is perversive. Aurlie is mouselike. Rea is sophomore. Rea is atrial. Rea is intended. Rea is mouselike. Rea is perversive. Young, leaflike things are sophomore. If Rea is mouselike then Rea is leaflike. All shelvy things are sophomore. If something is perversive and shelvy then it is sophomore. If something is perversive then it is shelvy. If something is mouselike then it is shelvy. Aurlie is not leaflike.", "logic": "\nLeaflike(izaak)\nAtrial(izaak)\nIntended(izaak)\nPerversive(izaak)\nMouselike(aurlie)\nSophomore(rea)\nAtrial(rea)\nIntended(rea)\nMouselike(rea)\nPerversive(rea)\nforall x (Perversive(x) and Leaflike(x) -> Sophomore(x))\nMouselike(rea) -> Leaflike(rea)\nforall x (Shelvy(x) -> Sophomore(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) and Shelvy(x) -> Sophomore(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Shelvy(x))\n\nnot Leaflike(aurlie)\n\nnot Leaflike(aurlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Elora is staring. Elora is gloved. Elora is offshore. Elora is cosmic. Andros is planate. Damita is diverted. Damita is gloved. Damita is offshore. Damita is planate. Damita is cosmic. Young, staring things are diverted. If Damita is planate then Damita is staring. All uplifted things are diverted. If something is cosmic and uplifted then it is diverted. If something is cosmic then it is uplifted. If something is planate then it is uplifted. Andros is offshore.", "logic": "\nStaring(elora)\nGloved(elora)\nOffshore(elora)\nCosmic(elora)\nPlanate(andros)\nDiverted(damita)\nGloved(damita)\nOffshore(damita)\nPlanate(damita)\nCosmic(damita)\nforall x (Cosmic(x) and Staring(x) -> Diverted(x))\nPlanate(damita) -> Staring(damita)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) -> Diverted(x))\nforall x (Cosmic(x) and Uplifted(x) -> Diverted(x))\nforall x (Cosmic(x) -> Uplifted(x))\nforall x (Planate(x) -> Uplifted(x))\n\nOffshore(andros)\n\nOffshore(andros) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "Anatole is not iodized. Jobina is vagrant. Jobina is unstylish. Sollie is haitian. Sollie is islamic. Sollie is iodized. Sollie is unstylish. All vagrant people are unstylish. If someone is vagrant and islamic then they are not iodized. Quiet people are tensed. All iodized people are islamic. If someone is tensed then they are islamic. If someone is tensed and not unstylish then they are enabling. If someone is unstylish and not vagrant then they are haitian. If someone is vagrant and not unstylish then they are haitian. Jobina is unstylish.", "logic": "\nnot Iodized(anatole)\nVagrant(jobina)\nUnstylish(jobina)\nHaitian(sollie)\nIslamic(sollie)\nIodized(sollie)\nUnstylish(sollie)\nforall x (Vagrant(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and Islamic(x) -> not Iodized(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) -> Tensed(x))\nforall x (Iodized(x) -> Islamic(x))\nforall x (Tensed(x) -> Islamic(x))\nforall x (Tensed(x) and not Unstylish(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Unstylish(x) and not Vagrant(x) -> Haitian(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and not Unstylish(x) -> Haitian(x))\n\nUnstylish(jobina)\n\ntherefore Unstylish(jobina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Alley is not calycine. Audie is anisogamic. Audie is whiplike. Elle is antennal. Elle is spotless. Elle is calycine. Elle is whiplike. All anisogamic people are whiplike. If someone is anisogamic and spotless then they are not calycine. Quiet people are lowset. All calycine people are spotless. If someone is lowset then they are spotless. If someone is lowset and not whiplike then they are ironlike. If someone is whiplike and not anisogamic then they are antennal. If someone is anisogamic and not whiplike then they are antennal. Elle is not whiplike.", "logic": "\nnot Calycine(alley)\nAnisogamic(audie)\nWhiplike(audie)\nAntennal(elle)\nSpotless(elle)\nCalycine(elle)\nWhiplike(elle)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Whiplike(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Spotless(x) -> not Calycine(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Lowset(x))\nforall x (Calycine(x) -> Spotless(x))\nforall x (Lowset(x) -> Spotless(x))\nforall x (Lowset(x) and not Whiplike(x) -> Ironlike(x))\nforall x (Whiplike(x) and not Anisogamic(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and not Whiplike(x) -> Antennal(x))\n\nnot Whiplike(elle)\n\ntherefore Whiplike(elle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Quinn is not aryan. Barbabas is harried. Barbabas is unsavoury. Salem is svelte. Salem is nonsexual. Salem is aryan. Salem is unsavoury. All harried people are unsavoury. If someone is harried and nonsexual then they are not aryan. Quiet people are comfy. All aryan people are nonsexual. If someone is comfy then they are nonsexual. If someone is comfy and not unsavoury then they are vedic. If someone is unsavoury and not harried then they are svelte. If someone is harried and not unsavoury then they are svelte. Barbabas is comfy.", "logic": "\nnot Aryan(quinn)\nHarried(barbabas)\nUnsavoury(barbabas)\nSvelte(salem)\nNonsexual(salem)\nAryan(salem)\nUnsavoury(salem)\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Unsavoury(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) and Nonsexual(x) -> not Aryan(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Comfy(x))\nforall x (Aryan(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Comfy(x) and not Unsavoury(x) -> Vedic(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) and not Harried(x) -> Svelte(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) and not Unsavoury(x) -> Svelte(x))\n\nComfy(barbabas)\n\nHarried(barbabas) and forall x (Harried(x) -> Comfy(x)) -> therefore Comfy(barbabas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Minda is not sure. Eugen is colonised. Eugen is impotent. Wandie is crusty. Wandie is obliged. Wandie is sure. Wandie is impotent. All colonised people are impotent. If someone is colonised and obliged then they are not sure. Quiet people are astute. All sure people are obliged. If someone is astute then they are obliged. If someone is astute and not impotent then they are kinglike. If someone is impotent and not colonised then they are crusty. If someone is colonised and not impotent then they are crusty. Eugen is not astute.", "logic": "\nnot Sure(minda)\nColonised(eugen)\nImpotent(eugen)\nCrusty(wandie)\nObliged(wandie)\nSure(wandie)\nImpotent(wandie)\nforall x (Colonised(x) -> Impotent(x))\nforall x (Colonised(x) and Obliged(x) -> not Sure(x))\nforall x (Colonised(x) -> Astute(x))\nforall x (Sure(x) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) and not Impotent(x) -> Kinglike(x))\nforall x (Impotent(x) and not Colonised(x) -> Crusty(x))\nforall x (Colonised(x) and not Impotent(x) -> Crusty(x))\n\nnot Astute(eugen)\n\nColonised(eugen) and forall x (Colonised(x) -> Astute(x)) -> therefore Astute(eugen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Simona is not nutrient. Heidi is xxxviii. Heidi is ongoing. Babara is besotted. Babara is gibelike. Babara is nutrient. Babara is ongoing. All xxxviii people are ongoing. If someone is xxxviii and gibelike then they are not nutrient. Quiet people are flatbottom. All nutrient people are gibelike. If someone is flatbottom then they are gibelike. If someone is flatbottom and not ongoing then they are meaningful. If someone is ongoing and not xxxviii then they are besotted. If someone is xxxviii and not ongoing then they are besotted. Heidi is gibelike.", "logic": "\nnot Nutrient(simona)\nXxxviii(heidi)\nOngoing(heidi)\nBesotted(babara)\nGibelike(babara)\nNutrient(babara)\nOngoing(babara)\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) and Gibelike(x) -> not Nutrient(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\nforall x (Nutrient(x) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) and not Ongoing(x) -> Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) and not Xxxviii(x) -> Besotted(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) and not Ongoing(x) -> Besotted(x))\n\nGibelike(heidi)\n\nXxxviii(heidi) and forall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Flatbottom(x)) -> therefore Flatbottom(heidi) Flatbottom(heidi) and forall x (Flatbottom(x) -> Gibelike(x)) -> therefore Gibelike(heidi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Yetty is not startling. Elisabeth is watercress. Elisabeth is mute. Lou is episodic. Lou is catacorner. Lou is startling. Lou is mute. All watercress people are mute. If someone is watercress and catacorner then they are not startling. Quiet people are ungoverned. All startling people are catacorner. If someone is ungoverned then they are catacorner. If someone is ungoverned and not mute then they are guileful. If someone is mute and not watercress then they are episodic. If someone is watercress and not mute then they are episodic. Elisabeth is not catacorner.", "logic": "\nnot Startling(yetty)\nWatercress(elisabeth)\nMute(elisabeth)\nEpisodic(lou)\nCatacorner(lou)\nStartling(lou)\nMute(lou)\nforall x (Watercress(x) -> Mute(x))\nforall x (Watercress(x) and Catacorner(x) -> not Startling(x))\nforall x (Watercress(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Startling(x) -> Catacorner(x))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Catacorner(x))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and not Mute(x) -> Guileful(x))\nforall x (Mute(x) and not Watercress(x) -> Episodic(x))\nforall x (Watercress(x) and not Mute(x) -> Episodic(x))\n\nnot Catacorner(elisabeth)\n\nWatercress(elisabeth) and forall x (Watercress(x) -> Ungoverned(x)) -> therefore Ungoverned(elisabeth) Ungoverned(elisabeth) and forall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Catacorner(x)) -> therefore Catacorner(elisabeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Germaine is not ceremonial. Maxi is jinxed. Maxi is meaty. Ingaberg is slanted. Ingaberg is genovese. Ingaberg is ceremonial. Ingaberg is meaty. All jinxed people are meaty. If someone is jinxed and genovese then they are not ceremonial. Quiet people are historic. All ceremonial people are genovese. If someone is historic then they are genovese. If someone is historic and not meaty then they are punished. If someone is meaty and not jinxed then they are slanted. If someone is jinxed and not meaty then they are slanted. Ingaberg is not historic.", "logic": "\nnot Ceremonial(germaine)\nJinxed(maxi)\nMeaty(maxi)\nSlanted(ingaberg)\nGenovese(ingaberg)\nCeremonial(ingaberg)\nMeaty(ingaberg)\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Meaty(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and Genovese(x) -> not Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Historic(x))\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Genovese(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Genovese(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) and not Meaty(x) -> Punished(x))\nforall x (Meaty(x) and not Jinxed(x) -> Slanted(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and not Meaty(x) -> Slanted(x))\n\nnot Historic(ingaberg)\n\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Historic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Katheryn is not plumlike. Neely is straining. Neely is silver. Robert is untimbered. Robert is smoking. Robert is plumlike. Robert is silver. All straining people are silver. If someone is straining and smoking then they are not plumlike. Quiet people are pediatric. All plumlike people are smoking. If someone is pediatric then they are smoking. If someone is pediatric and not silver then they are thickening. If someone is silver and not straining then they are untimbered. If someone is straining and not silver then they are untimbered. Neely is untimbered.", "logic": "\nnot Plumlike(katheryn)\nStraining(neely)\nSilver(neely)\nUntimbered(robert)\nSmoking(robert)\nPlumlike(robert)\nSilver(robert)\nforall x (Straining(x) -> Silver(x))\nforall x (Straining(x) and Smoking(x) -> not Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Straining(x) -> Pediatric(x))\nforall x (Plumlike(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and not Silver(x) -> Thickening(x))\nforall x (Silver(x) and not Straining(x) -> Untimbered(x))\nforall x (Straining(x) and not Silver(x) -> Untimbered(x))\n\nUntimbered(neely)\n\nforall x (Silver(x) and not Straining(x) -> Untimbered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Denny is not bawdy. Nico is cyprian. Nico is silken. Pail is nervous. Pail is solvent. Pail is bawdy. Pail is silken. All cyprian people are silken. If someone is cyprian and solvent then they are not bawdy. Quiet people are endoergic. All bawdy people are solvent. If someone is endoergic then they are solvent. If someone is endoergic and not silken then they are depressed. If someone is silken and not cyprian then they are nervous. If someone is cyprian and not silken then they are nervous. Denny is not depressed.", "logic": "\nnot Bawdy(denny)\nCyprian(nico)\nSilken(nico)\nNervous(pail)\nSolvent(pail)\nBawdy(pail)\nSilken(pail)\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Silken(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and Solvent(x) -> not Bawdy(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Endoergic(x))\nforall x (Bawdy(x) -> Solvent(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> Solvent(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and not Silken(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Silken(x) and not Cyprian(x) -> Nervous(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and not Silken(x) -> Nervous(x))\n\nnot Depressed(denny)\n\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and not Silken(x) -> Depressed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Hertha is not sexual. Bridget is skew. Bridget is apoplectic. Alexina is chaldaean. Alexina is towheaded. Alexina is sexual. Alexina is apoplectic. All skew people are apoplectic. If someone is skew and towheaded then they are not sexual. Quiet people are casuistic. All sexual people are towheaded. If someone is casuistic then they are towheaded. If someone is casuistic and not apoplectic then they are idolized. If someone is apoplectic and not skew then they are chaldaean. If someone is skew and not apoplectic then they are chaldaean. Hertha is skew.", "logic": "\nnot Sexual(hertha)\nSkew(bridget)\nApoplectic(bridget)\nChaldaean(alexina)\nTowheaded(alexina)\nSexual(alexina)\nApoplectic(alexina)\nforall x (Skew(x) -> Apoplectic(x))\nforall x (Skew(x) and Towheaded(x) -> not Sexual(x))\nforall x (Skew(x) -> Casuistic(x))\nforall x (Sexual(x) -> Towheaded(x))\nforall x (Casuistic(x) -> Towheaded(x))\nforall x (Casuistic(x) and not Apoplectic(x) -> Idolized(x))\nforall x (Apoplectic(x) and not Skew(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nforall x (Skew(x) and not Apoplectic(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\n\nSkew(hertha)\n\nSkew(hertha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-935"} {"premises": "Josselyn is dendritic. Josselyn is glazed. Janis is not unquiet. Janis is blind. Siffre is unheeded. Siffre is marooned. Tatiania is not marooned. Red things are carpal. Smart things are carpal. If Janis is glazed and Janis is not unheeded then Janis is not carpal. Smart things are not dendritic. Big things are marooned. If something is marooned and not glazed then it is not blind. Siffre is unheeded.", "logic": "\nDendritic(josselyn)\nGlazed(josselyn)\nnot Unquiet(janis)\nBlind(janis)\nUnheeded(siffre)\nMarooned(siffre)\nnot Marooned(tatiania)\nforall x (Blind(x) -> Carpal(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) -> Carpal(x))\nGlazed(janis) and not Unheeded(janis) -> not Carpal(janis)\nforall x (Marooned(x) -> not Dendritic(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Marooned(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) and not Glazed(x) -> not Blind(x))\n\nUnheeded(siffre)\n\ntherefore Unheeded(siffre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Hersch is unroofed. Hersch is unlipped. Juana is not trilobated. Juana is faithless. Siobhan is convinced. Siobhan is bitterish. Harriette is not bitterish. Red things are anserine. Smart things are anserine. If Juana is unlipped and Juana is not convinced then Juana is not anserine. Smart things are not unroofed. Big things are bitterish. If something is bitterish and not unlipped then it is not faithless. Harriette is bitterish.", "logic": "\nUnroofed(hersch)\nUnlipped(hersch)\nnot Trilobated(juana)\nFaithless(juana)\nConvinced(siobhan)\nBitterish(siobhan)\nnot Bitterish(harriette)\nforall x (Faithless(x) -> Anserine(x))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) -> Anserine(x))\nUnlipped(juana) and not Convinced(juana) -> not Anserine(juana)\nforall x (Bitterish(x) -> not Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Anserine(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and not Unlipped(x) -> not Faithless(x))\n\nBitterish(harriette)\n\ntherefore not Bitterish(harriette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Cappella is toupeed. Cappella is musical. Graehme is not rearmost. Graehme is clean. Verla is hardline. Verla is ignitible. Waverley is not ignitible. Red things are human. Smart things are human. If Graehme is musical and Graehme is not hardline then Graehme is not human. Smart things are not toupeed. Big things are ignitible. If something is ignitible and not musical then it is not clean. Verla is human.", "logic": "\nToupeed(cappella)\nMusical(cappella)\nnot Rearmost(graehme)\nClean(graehme)\nHardline(verla)\nIgnitible(verla)\nnot Ignitible(waverley)\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) -> Human(x))\nMusical(graehme) and not Hardline(graehme) -> not Human(graehme)\nforall x (Ignitible(x) -> not Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Ignitible(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and not Musical(x) -> not Clean(x))\n\nHuman(verla)\n\nIgnitible(verla) and forall x (Ignitible(x) -> Human(x)) -> therefore Human(verla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Corene is awninged. Corene is liquid. Louisette is not disgusting. Louisette is milled. Chuck is sable. Chuck is fifteen. Will is not fifteen. Red things are muggy. Smart things are muggy. If Louisette is liquid and Louisette is not sable then Louisette is not muggy. Smart things are not awninged. Big things are fifteen. If something is fifteen and not liquid then it is not milled. Louisette is not muggy.", "logic": "\nAwninged(corene)\nLiquid(corene)\nnot Disgusting(louisette)\nMilled(louisette)\nSable(chuck)\nFifteen(chuck)\nnot Fifteen(will)\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Muggy(x))\nforall x (Fifteen(x) -> Muggy(x))\nLiquid(louisette) and not Sable(louisette) -> not Muggy(louisette)\nforall x (Fifteen(x) -> not Awninged(x))\nforall x (Muggy(x) -> Fifteen(x))\nforall x (Fifteen(x) and not Liquid(x) -> not Milled(x))\n\nnot Muggy(louisette)\n\nMilled(louisette) and forall x (Milled(x) -> Muggy(x)) -> therefore Muggy(louisette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Alisha is serflike. Alisha is gangling. Ibby is not converted. Ibby is shrill. Tersina is morbid. Tersina is polymeric. Dulcia is not polymeric. Red things are gristly. Smart things are gristly. If Ibby is gangling and Ibby is not morbid then Ibby is not gristly. Smart things are not serflike. Big things are polymeric. If something is polymeric and not gangling then it is not shrill. Ibby is polymeric.", "logic": "\nSerflike(alisha)\nGangling(alisha)\nnot Converted(ibby)\nShrill(ibby)\nMorbid(tersina)\nPolymeric(tersina)\nnot Polymeric(dulcia)\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Gristly(x))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) -> Gristly(x))\nGangling(ibby) and not Morbid(ibby) -> not Gristly(ibby)\nforall x (Polymeric(x) -> not Serflike(x))\nforall x (Gristly(x) -> Polymeric(x))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) and not Gangling(x) -> not Shrill(x))\n\nPolymeric(ibby)\n\nShrill(ibby) and forall x (Shrill(x) -> Gristly(x)) -> therefore Gristly(ibby) Gristly(ibby) and forall x (Gristly(x) -> Polymeric(x)) -> therefore Polymeric(ibby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Philis is autogenous. Philis is gold. Shara is not discursive. Shara is surrounded. Emili is simple. Emili is betting. Charlena is not betting. Red things are underbred. Smart things are underbred. If Shara is gold and Shara is not simple then Shara is not underbred. Smart things are not autogenous. Big things are betting. If something is betting and not gold then it is not surrounded. Shara is not betting.", "logic": "\nAutogenous(philis)\nGold(philis)\nnot Discursive(shara)\nSurrounded(shara)\nSimple(emili)\nBetting(emili)\nnot Betting(charlena)\nforall x (Surrounded(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) -> Underbred(x))\nGold(shara) and not Simple(shara) -> not Underbred(shara)\nforall x (Betting(x) -> not Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Underbred(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) and not Gold(x) -> not Surrounded(x))\n\nnot Betting(shara)\n\nSurrounded(shara) and forall x (Surrounded(x) -> Underbred(x)) -> therefore Underbred(shara) Underbred(shara) and forall x (Underbred(x) -> Betting(x)) -> therefore Betting(shara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Nettle is pareve. Nettle is moslem. Nelson is not choked. Nelson is knockdown. Catlee is microsomal. Catlee is spondaic. Isidora is not spondaic. Red things are hale. Smart things are hale. If Nelson is moslem and Nelson is not microsomal then Nelson is not hale. Smart things are not pareve. Big things are spondaic. If something is spondaic and not moslem then it is not knockdown. Nettle is not spondaic.", "logic": "\nPareve(nettle)\nMoslem(nettle)\nnot Choked(nelson)\nKnockdown(nelson)\nMicrosomal(catlee)\nSpondaic(catlee)\nnot Spondaic(isidora)\nforall x (Knockdown(x) -> Hale(x))\nforall x (Spondaic(x) -> Hale(x))\nMoslem(nelson) and not Microsomal(nelson) -> not Hale(nelson)\nforall x (Spondaic(x) -> not Pareve(x))\nforall x (Hale(x) -> Spondaic(x))\nforall x (Spondaic(x) and not Moslem(x) -> not Knockdown(x))\n\nnot Spondaic(nettle)\n\nforall x (Hale(x) -> Spondaic(x)) <- forall x (Knockdown(x) -> Hale(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Dora is biovular. Dora is homophonic. Lothar is not composite. Lothar is albitic. Katya is driving. Katya is dingy. Slade is not dingy. Red things are nestorian. Smart things are nestorian. If Lothar is homophonic and Lothar is not driving then Lothar is not nestorian. Smart things are not biovular. Big things are dingy. If something is dingy and not homophonic then it is not albitic. Dora is nestorian.", "logic": "\nBiovular(dora)\nHomophonic(dora)\nnot Composite(lothar)\nAlbitic(lothar)\nDriving(katya)\nDingy(katya)\nnot Dingy(slade)\nforall x (Albitic(x) -> Nestorian(x))\nforall x (Dingy(x) -> Nestorian(x))\nHomophonic(lothar) and not Driving(lothar) -> not Nestorian(lothar)\nforall x (Dingy(x) -> not Biovular(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Dingy(x))\nforall x (Dingy(x) and not Homophonic(x) -> not Albitic(x))\n\nNestorian(dora)\n\nforall x (Dingy(x) -> Nestorian(x)) <- forall x (Nestorian(x) -> Dingy(x)) <- forall x (Albitic(x) -> Nestorian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Armstrong is neapolitan. Armstrong is ataractic. Charlotte is not assumed. Charlotte is monastical. Simeon is costive. Simeon is snarly. Rebbecca is not snarly. Red things are cylindric. Smart things are cylindric. If Charlotte is ataractic and Charlotte is not costive then Charlotte is not cylindric. Smart things are not neapolitan. Big things are snarly. If something is snarly and not ataractic then it is not monastical. Rebbecca is not cylindric.", "logic": "\nNeapolitan(armstrong)\nAtaractic(armstrong)\nnot Assumed(charlotte)\nMonastical(charlotte)\nCostive(simeon)\nSnarly(simeon)\nnot Snarly(rebbecca)\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> Cylindric(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) -> Cylindric(x))\nAtaractic(charlotte) and not Costive(charlotte) -> not Cylindric(charlotte)\nforall x (Snarly(x) -> not Neapolitan(x))\nforall x (Cylindric(x) -> Snarly(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) and not Ataractic(x) -> not Monastical(x))\n\nnot Cylindric(rebbecca)\n\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> Cylindric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Claudia is diminuendo. Claudia is funereal. Sophronia is not leaning. Sophronia is taxonomic. Gilburt is callable. Gilburt is backstairs. Marris is not backstairs. Red things are brutal. Smart things are brutal. If Sophronia is funereal and Sophronia is not callable then Sophronia is not brutal. Smart things are not diminuendo. Big things are backstairs. If something is backstairs and not funereal then it is not taxonomic. Gilburt is leaning.", "logic": "\nDiminuendo(claudia)\nFunereal(claudia)\nnot Leaning(sophronia)\nTaxonomic(sophronia)\nCallable(gilburt)\nBackstairs(gilburt)\nnot Backstairs(marris)\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Backstairs(x) -> Brutal(x))\nFunereal(sophronia) and not Callable(sophronia) -> not Brutal(sophronia)\nforall x (Backstairs(x) -> not Diminuendo(x))\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Backstairs(x))\nforall x (Backstairs(x) and not Funereal(x) -> not Taxonomic(x))\n\nLeaning(gilburt)\n\nLeaning(gilburt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Case is coherent. Case is nonmoving. Idette is not paleozoic. Idette is entitled. Udale is foster. Udale is baffling. Stoddard is not baffling. Red things are tigerish. Smart things are tigerish. If Idette is nonmoving and Idette is not foster then Idette is not tigerish. Smart things are not coherent. Big things are baffling. If something is baffling and not nonmoving then it is not entitled. Case is not paleozoic.", "logic": "\nCoherent(case)\nNonmoving(case)\nnot Paleozoic(idette)\nEntitled(idette)\nFoster(udale)\nBaffling(udale)\nnot Baffling(stoddard)\nforall x (Entitled(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Baffling(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nNonmoving(idette) and not Foster(idette) -> not Tigerish(idette)\nforall x (Baffling(x) -> not Coherent(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Baffling(x))\nforall x (Baffling(x) and not Nonmoving(x) -> not Entitled(x))\n\nnot Paleozoic(case)\n\nnot Paleozoic(case) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "Dimitry is isosmotic. Dimitry is turbid. Antonin is not spicy. Antonin is windburned. Lynsey is shoddy. Lynsey is tallish. Alexis is not tallish. Red things are pharaonic. Smart things are pharaonic. If Antonin is turbid and Antonin is not shoddy then Antonin is not pharaonic. Smart things are not isosmotic. Big things are tallish. If something is tallish and not turbid then it is not windburned. Alexis is spicy.", "logic": "\nIsosmotic(dimitry)\nTurbid(dimitry)\nnot Spicy(antonin)\nWindburned(antonin)\nShoddy(lynsey)\nTallish(lynsey)\nnot Tallish(alexis)\nforall x (Windburned(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nTurbid(antonin) and not Shoddy(antonin) -> not Pharaonic(antonin)\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> not Isosmotic(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Tallish(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) and not Turbid(x) -> not Windburned(x))\n\nSpicy(alexis)\n\nSpicy(alexis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1011"} {"premises": "The lester recharge the diandra. The roland recharge the diandra. The diandra is huffy. If something is unplanned and huffy then it recharge the lester. If something deforest the diandra and it is global then the diandra deforest the roland. If something recharge the lester then the lester recharge the roland. If something recharge the diandra then it deforest the lester. Nice things are huffy. If something deforest the diandra then it is global. If something is huffy then it deforest the diandra. If something is huffy and inane then it deforest the diandra. The diandra is huffy.", "logic": "\nRecharge(lester, diandra)\nRecharge(roland, diandra)\nHuffy(diandra)\nforall x (Unplanned(x) and Huffy(x) -> Recharge(x, lester))\nforall x (Deforest(x, diandra) and Global(x) -> Deforest(diandra, roland))\nforall x (Recharge(x, lester) -> Recharge(lester, roland))\nforall x (Recharge(x, diandra) -> Deforest(x, lester))\nforall x (Unplanned(x) -> Huffy(x))\nforall x (Deforest(x, diandra) -> Global(x))\nforall x (Huffy(x) -> Deforest(x, diandra))\nforall x (Huffy(x) and Inane(x) -> Deforest(x, diandra))\n\nHuffy(diandra)\n\ntherefore Huffy(diandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The reid avianise the elliott. The oralia avianise the elliott. The elliott is gammy. If something is fatherless and gammy then it avianise the reid. If something lithograph the elliott and it is refulgent then the elliott lithograph the oralia. If something avianise the reid then the reid avianise the oralia. If something avianise the elliott then it lithograph the reid. Nice things are gammy. If something lithograph the elliott then it is refulgent. If something is gammy then it lithograph the elliott. If something is gammy and ecstatic then it lithograph the elliott. The reid does not like the elliott.", "logic": "\nAvianise(reid, elliott)\nAvianise(oralia, elliott)\nGammy(elliott)\nforall x (Fatherless(x) and Gammy(x) -> Avianise(x, reid))\nforall x (Lithograph(x, elliott) and Refulgent(x) -> Lithograph(elliott, oralia))\nforall x (Avianise(x, reid) -> Avianise(reid, oralia))\nforall x (Avianise(x, elliott) -> Lithograph(x, reid))\nforall x (Fatherless(x) -> Gammy(x))\nforall x (Lithograph(x, elliott) -> Refulgent(x))\nforall x (Gammy(x) -> Lithograph(x, elliott))\nforall x (Gammy(x) and Ecstatic(x) -> Lithograph(x, elliott))\n\nnot Avianise(reid, elliott)\n\ntherefore Avianise(reid, elliott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The tyrone invert the rena. The armand invert the rena. The rena is unsecured. If something is aggregate and unsecured then it invert the tyrone. If something denudate the rena and it is oratorical then the rena denudate the armand. If something invert the tyrone then the tyrone invert the armand. If something invert the rena then it denudate the tyrone. Nice things are unsecured. If something denudate the rena then it is oratorical. If something is unsecured then it denudate the rena. If something is unsecured and orthoptic then it denudate the rena. The armand denudate the tyrone.", "logic": "\nInvert(tyrone, rena)\nInvert(armand, rena)\nUnsecured(rena)\nforall x (Aggregate(x) and Unsecured(x) -> Invert(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Denudate(x, rena) and Oratorical(x) -> Denudate(rena, armand))\nforall x (Invert(x, tyrone) -> Invert(tyrone, armand))\nforall x (Invert(x, rena) -> Denudate(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Aggregate(x) -> Unsecured(x))\nforall x (Denudate(x, rena) -> Oratorical(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) -> Denudate(x, rena))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) and Orthoptic(x) -> Denudate(x, rena))\n\nDenudate(armand, tyrone)\n\nInvert(armand, rena) and forall x (Invert(x, rena) -> Denudate(x, tyrone)) -> therefore Denudate(armand, tyrone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The lurline deplete the bobby. The tracy deplete the bobby. The bobby is mangey. If something is brunette and mangey then it deplete the lurline. If something despond the bobby and it is downlike then the bobby despond the tracy. If something deplete the lurline then the lurline deplete the tracy. If something deplete the bobby then it despond the lurline. Nice things are mangey. If something despond the bobby then it is downlike. If something is mangey then it despond the bobby. If something is mangey and betrothed then it despond the bobby. The lurline does not chase the lurline.", "logic": "\nDeplete(lurline, bobby)\nDeplete(tracy, bobby)\nMangey(bobby)\nforall x (Brunette(x) and Mangey(x) -> Deplete(x, lurline))\nforall x (Despond(x, bobby) and Downlike(x) -> Despond(bobby, tracy))\nforall x (Deplete(x, lurline) -> Deplete(lurline, tracy))\nforall x (Deplete(x, bobby) -> Despond(x, lurline))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Mangey(x))\nforall x (Despond(x, bobby) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> Despond(x, bobby))\nforall x (Mangey(x) and Betrothed(x) -> Despond(x, bobby))\n\nnot Despond(lurline, lurline)\n\nDeplete(lurline, bobby) and forall x (Deplete(x, bobby) -> Despond(x, lurline)) -> therefore Despond(lurline, lurline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The trudy cheat the joshuah. The elbert cheat the joshuah. The joshuah is birken. If something is leafed and birken then it cheat the trudy. If something gaggle the joshuah and it is retro then the joshuah gaggle the elbert. If something cheat the trudy then the trudy cheat the elbert. If something cheat the joshuah then it gaggle the trudy. Nice things are birken. If something gaggle the joshuah then it is retro. If something is birken then it gaggle the joshuah. If something is birken and bellicose then it gaggle the joshuah. The joshuah is retro.", "logic": "\nCheat(trudy, joshuah)\nCheat(elbert, joshuah)\nBirken(joshuah)\nforall x (Leafed(x) and Birken(x) -> Cheat(x, trudy))\nforall x (Gaggle(x, joshuah) and Retro(x) -> Gaggle(joshuah, elbert))\nforall x (Cheat(x, trudy) -> Cheat(trudy, elbert))\nforall x (Cheat(x, joshuah) -> Gaggle(x, trudy))\nforall x (Leafed(x) -> Birken(x))\nforall x (Gaggle(x, joshuah) -> Retro(x))\nforall x (Birken(x) -> Gaggle(x, joshuah))\nforall x (Birken(x) and Bellicose(x) -> Gaggle(x, joshuah))\n\nRetro(joshuah)\n\nBirken(joshuah) and forall x (Birken(x) -> Gaggle(x, joshuah)) -> therefore Gaggle(joshuah, joshuah) Gaggle(joshuah, joshuah) and forall x (Gaggle(x, joshuah) -> Retro(x)) -> therefore Retro(joshuah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The annabela confront the shlomo. The rosana confront the shlomo. The shlomo is duckbill. If something is truthful and duckbill then it confront the annabela. If something splutter the shlomo and it is sagging then the shlomo splutter the rosana. If something confront the annabela then the annabela confront the rosana. If something confront the shlomo then it splutter the annabela. Nice things are duckbill. If something splutter the shlomo then it is sagging. If something is duckbill then it splutter the shlomo. If something is duckbill and immobile then it splutter the shlomo. The shlomo is not sagging.", "logic": "\nConfront(annabela, shlomo)\nConfront(rosana, shlomo)\nDuckbill(shlomo)\nforall x (Truthful(x) and Duckbill(x) -> Confront(x, annabela))\nforall x (Splutter(x, shlomo) and Sagging(x) -> Splutter(shlomo, rosana))\nforall x (Confront(x, annabela) -> Confront(annabela, rosana))\nforall x (Confront(x, shlomo) -> Splutter(x, annabela))\nforall x (Truthful(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Splutter(x, shlomo) -> Sagging(x))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) -> Splutter(x, shlomo))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Immobile(x) -> Splutter(x, shlomo))\n\nnot Sagging(shlomo)\n\nDuckbill(shlomo) and forall x (Duckbill(x) -> Splutter(x, shlomo)) -> therefore Splutter(shlomo, shlomo) Splutter(shlomo, shlomo) and forall x (Splutter(x, shlomo) -> Sagging(x)) -> therefore Sagging(shlomo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The wendie betray the tyson. The monica betray the tyson. The tyson is aberdonian. If something is contrasty and aberdonian then it betray the wendie. If something deduct the tyson and it is radial then the tyson deduct the monica. If something betray the wendie then the wendie betray the monica. If something betray the tyson then it deduct the wendie. Nice things are aberdonian. If something deduct the tyson then it is radial. If something is aberdonian then it deduct the tyson. If something is aberdonian and clinical then it deduct the tyson. The monica is not aberdonian.", "logic": "\nBetray(wendie, tyson)\nBetray(monica, tyson)\nAberdonian(tyson)\nforall x (Contrasty(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Betray(x, wendie))\nforall x (Deduct(x, tyson) and Radial(x) -> Deduct(tyson, monica))\nforall x (Betray(x, wendie) -> Betray(wendie, monica))\nforall x (Betray(x, tyson) -> Deduct(x, wendie))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\nforall x (Deduct(x, tyson) -> Radial(x))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Deduct(x, tyson))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) and Clinical(x) -> Deduct(x, tyson))\n\nnot Aberdonian(monica)\n\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Aberdonian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The cynthie relate the teddy. The wallache relate the teddy. The teddy is unrevealed. If something is unkind and unrevealed then it relate the cynthie. If something enfeoff the teddy and it is vertebral then the teddy enfeoff the wallache. If something relate the cynthie then the cynthie relate the wallache. If something relate the teddy then it enfeoff the cynthie. Nice things are unrevealed. If something enfeoff the teddy then it is vertebral. If something is unrevealed then it enfeoff the teddy. If something is unrevealed and simulated then it enfeoff the teddy. The wallache is vertebral.", "logic": "\nRelate(cynthie, teddy)\nRelate(wallache, teddy)\nUnrevealed(teddy)\nforall x (Unkind(x) and Unrevealed(x) -> Relate(x, cynthie))\nforall x (Enfeoff(x, teddy) and Vertebral(x) -> Enfeoff(teddy, wallache))\nforall x (Relate(x, cynthie) -> Relate(cynthie, wallache))\nforall x (Relate(x, teddy) -> Enfeoff(x, cynthie))\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Enfeoff(x, teddy) -> Vertebral(x))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Enfeoff(x, teddy))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) and Simulated(x) -> Enfeoff(x, teddy))\n\nVertebral(wallache)\n\nforall x (Enfeoff(x, teddy) -> Vertebral(x)) <- forall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Enfeoff(x, teddy)) <- forall x (Unkind(x) -> Unrevealed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The vanna stabilize the dante. The andri stabilize the dante. The dante is salverform. If something is dapper and salverform then it stabilize the vanna. If something befuddle the dante and it is unobvious then the dante befuddle the andri. If something stabilize the vanna then the vanna stabilize the andri. If something stabilize the dante then it befuddle the vanna. Nice things are salverform. If something befuddle the dante then it is unobvious. If something is salverform then it befuddle the dante. If something is salverform and grassless then it befuddle the dante. The dante does not chase the vanna.", "logic": "\nStabilize(vanna, dante)\nStabilize(andri, dante)\nSalverform(dante)\nforall x (Dapper(x) and Salverform(x) -> Stabilize(x, vanna))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, dante) and Unobvious(x) -> Befuddle(dante, andri))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, vanna) -> Stabilize(vanna, andri))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, dante) -> Befuddle(x, vanna))\nforall x (Dapper(x) -> Salverform(x))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, dante) -> Unobvious(x))\nforall x (Salverform(x) -> Befuddle(x, dante))\nforall x (Salverform(x) and Grassless(x) -> Befuddle(x, dante))\n\nnot Befuddle(dante, vanna)\n\nforall x (Stabilize(x, dante) -> Befuddle(x, vanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The leshia ballast the leoine. The rhody ballast the leoine. The leoine is kaput. If something is accessory and kaput then it ballast the leshia. If something festinate the leoine and it is defunct then the leoine festinate the rhody. If something ballast the leshia then the leshia ballast the rhody. If something ballast the leoine then it festinate the leshia. Nice things are kaput. If something festinate the leoine then it is defunct. If something is kaput then it festinate the leoine. If something is kaput and flickering then it festinate the leoine. The rhody needs the leshia.", "logic": "\nBallast(leshia, leoine)\nBallast(rhody, leoine)\nKaput(leoine)\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Kaput(x) -> Ballast(x, leshia))\nforall x (Festinate(x, leoine) and Defunct(x) -> Festinate(leoine, rhody))\nforall x (Ballast(x, leshia) -> Ballast(leshia, rhody))\nforall x (Ballast(x, leoine) -> Festinate(x, leshia))\nforall x (Accessory(x) -> Kaput(x))\nforall x (Festinate(x, leoine) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Kaput(x) -> Festinate(x, leoine))\nforall x (Kaput(x) and Flickering(x) -> Festinate(x, leoine))\n\nNeeds(rhody, leshia)\n\nNeeds(rhody, leshia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The colbert farce the jerrilee. The mac farce the jerrilee. The jerrilee is stylish. If something is bragging and stylish then it farce the colbert. If something emancipate the jerrilee and it is upmost then the jerrilee emancipate the mac. If something farce the colbert then the colbert farce the mac. If something farce the jerrilee then it emancipate the colbert. Nice things are stylish. If something emancipate the jerrilee then it is upmost. If something is stylish then it emancipate the jerrilee. If something is stylish and copasetic then it emancipate the jerrilee. The colbert is not kind.", "logic": "\nFarce(colbert, jerrilee)\nFarce(mac, jerrilee)\nStylish(jerrilee)\nforall x (Bragging(x) and Stylish(x) -> Farce(x, colbert))\nforall x (Emancipate(x, jerrilee) and Upmost(x) -> Emancipate(jerrilee, mac))\nforall x (Farce(x, colbert) -> Farce(colbert, mac))\nforall x (Farce(x, jerrilee) -> Emancipate(x, colbert))\nforall x (Bragging(x) -> Stylish(x))\nforall x (Emancipate(x, jerrilee) -> Upmost(x))\nforall x (Stylish(x) -> Emancipate(x, jerrilee))\nforall x (Stylish(x) and Copasetic(x) -> Emancipate(x, jerrilee))\n\nnot Kind(colbert)\n\nnot Kind(colbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The rivy carburize the bette. The lynnell carburize the bette. The bette is ignored. If something is gilled and ignored then it carburize the rivy. If something disbud the bette and it is unitarian then the bette disbud the lynnell. If something carburize the rivy then the rivy carburize the lynnell. If something carburize the bette then it disbud the rivy. Nice things are ignored. If something disbud the bette then it is unitarian. If something is ignored then it disbud the bette. If something is ignored and unsighted then it disbud the bette. The lynnell is unsighted.", "logic": "\nCarburize(rivy, bette)\nCarburize(lynnell, bette)\nIgnored(bette)\nforall x (Gilled(x) and Ignored(x) -> Carburize(x, rivy))\nforall x (Disbud(x, bette) and Unitarian(x) -> Disbud(bette, lynnell))\nforall x (Carburize(x, rivy) -> Carburize(rivy, lynnell))\nforall x (Carburize(x, bette) -> Disbud(x, rivy))\nforall x (Gilled(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Disbud(x, bette) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Ignored(x) -> Disbud(x, bette))\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Unsighted(x) -> Disbud(x, bette))\n\nUnsighted(lynnell)\n\nUnsighted(lynnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1800"} {"premises": "The wald is apophyseal. The wald is overlooked. The wald condole the roberta. The jose islamise the roberta. The jose is overlooked. The jose condole the wald. The jose condole the roberta. The roberta is unavenged. The roberta condole the jose. The roberta yaup the wald. If something yaup the wald then the wald yaup the jose. If something is apophyseal and it yaup the jose then it is slicked. The jose condole the roberta.", "logic": "\nApophyseal(wald)\nOverlooked(wald)\nCondole(wald, roberta)\nIslamise(jose, roberta)\nOverlooked(jose)\nCondole(jose, wald)\nCondole(jose, roberta)\nUnavenged(roberta)\nCondole(roberta, jose)\nYaup(roberta, wald)\nforall x (Yaup(x, wald) -> Yaup(wald, jose))\nforall x (Apophyseal(x) and Yaup(x, jose) -> Slicked(x))\n\nCondole(jose, roberta)\n\ntherefore Condole(jose, roberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The mateo is continent. The mateo is acrogenic. The mateo nibble the chas. The bernhard rearm the chas. The bernhard is acrogenic. The bernhard nibble the mateo. The bernhard nibble the chas. The chas is inflowing. The chas nibble the bernhard. The chas catalyze the mateo. If something catalyze the mateo then the mateo catalyze the bernhard. If something is continent and it catalyze the bernhard then it is corrective. The bernhard does not eat the chas.", "logic": "\nContinent(mateo)\nAcrogenic(mateo)\nNibble(mateo, chas)\nRearm(bernhard, chas)\nAcrogenic(bernhard)\nNibble(bernhard, mateo)\nNibble(bernhard, chas)\nInflowing(chas)\nNibble(chas, bernhard)\nCatalyze(chas, mateo)\nforall x (Catalyze(x, mateo) -> Catalyze(mateo, bernhard))\nforall x (Continent(x) and Catalyze(x, bernhard) -> Corrective(x))\n\nnot Rearm(bernhard, chas)\n\ntherefore Rearm(bernhard, chas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The otto is alienated. The otto is bicolor. The otto unbraid the mayor. The casandra furlough the mayor. The casandra is bicolor. The casandra unbraid the otto. The casandra unbraid the mayor. The mayor is unroofed. The mayor unbraid the casandra. The mayor route the otto. If something route the otto then the otto route the casandra. If something is alienated and it route the casandra then it is fibrinous. The otto route the casandra.", "logic": "\nAlienated(otto)\nBicolor(otto)\nUnbraid(otto, mayor)\nFurlough(casandra, mayor)\nBicolor(casandra)\nUnbraid(casandra, otto)\nUnbraid(casandra, mayor)\nUnroofed(mayor)\nUnbraid(mayor, casandra)\nRoute(mayor, otto)\nforall x (Route(x, otto) -> Route(otto, casandra))\nforall x (Alienated(x) and Route(x, casandra) -> Fibrinous(x))\n\nRoute(otto, casandra)\n\nRoute(mayor, otto) and forall x (Route(x, otto) -> Route(otto, casandra)) -> therefore Route(otto, casandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The gwenette is sublimed. The gwenette is exhausting. The gwenette deceive the fitz. The elden fleet the fitz. The elden is exhausting. The elden deceive the gwenette. The elden deceive the fitz. The fitz is veinal. The fitz deceive the elden. The fitz dilapidate the gwenette. If something dilapidate the gwenette then the gwenette dilapidate the elden. If something is sublimed and it dilapidate the elden then it is polite. The gwenette does not visit the elden.", "logic": "\nSublimed(gwenette)\nExhausting(gwenette)\nDeceive(gwenette, fitz)\nFleet(elden, fitz)\nExhausting(elden)\nDeceive(elden, gwenette)\nDeceive(elden, fitz)\nVeinal(fitz)\nDeceive(fitz, elden)\nDilapidate(fitz, gwenette)\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, gwenette) -> Dilapidate(gwenette, elden))\nforall x (Sublimed(x) and Dilapidate(x, elden) -> Polite(x))\n\nnot Dilapidate(gwenette, elden)\n\nDilapidate(fitz, gwenette) and forall x (Dilapidate(x, gwenette) -> Dilapidate(gwenette, elden)) -> therefore Dilapidate(gwenette, elden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The derrick is mangey. The derrick is ictic. The derrick anele the kerri. The joyan scaffold the kerri. The joyan is ictic. The joyan anele the derrick. The joyan anele the kerri. The kerri is xxxiii. The kerri anele the joyan. The kerri overdrive the derrick. If something overdrive the derrick then the derrick overdrive the joyan. If something is mangey and it overdrive the joyan then it is degage. The derrick is degage.", "logic": "\nMangey(derrick)\nIctic(derrick)\nAnele(derrick, kerri)\nScaffold(joyan, kerri)\nIctic(joyan)\nAnele(joyan, derrick)\nAnele(joyan, kerri)\nXxxiii(kerri)\nAnele(kerri, joyan)\nOverdrive(kerri, derrick)\nforall x (Overdrive(x, derrick) -> Overdrive(derrick, joyan))\nforall x (Mangey(x) and Overdrive(x, joyan) -> Degage(x))\n\nDegage(derrick)\n\nOverdrive(kerri, derrick) and forall x (Overdrive(x, derrick) -> Overdrive(derrick, joyan)) -> therefore Overdrive(derrick, joyan) Mangey(derrick) and Overdrive(derrick, joyan) and forall x (Mangey(x) and Overdrive(x, joyan) -> Degage(x)) -> therefore Degage(derrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The prasad is combinable. The prasad is proximo. The prasad narrate the gershom. The saunders fraction the gershom. The saunders is proximo. The saunders narrate the prasad. The saunders narrate the gershom. The gershom is emulous. The gershom narrate the saunders. The gershom cure the prasad. If something cure the prasad then the prasad cure the saunders. If something is combinable and it cure the saunders then it is arctic. The prasad is not arctic.", "logic": "\nCombinable(prasad)\nProximo(prasad)\nNarrate(prasad, gershom)\nFraction(saunders, gershom)\nProximo(saunders)\nNarrate(saunders, prasad)\nNarrate(saunders, gershom)\nEmulous(gershom)\nNarrate(gershom, saunders)\nCure(gershom, prasad)\nforall x (Cure(x, prasad) -> Cure(prasad, saunders))\nforall x (Combinable(x) and Cure(x, saunders) -> Arctic(x))\n\nnot Arctic(prasad)\n\nCure(gershom, prasad) and forall x (Cure(x, prasad) -> Cure(prasad, saunders)) -> therefore Cure(prasad, saunders) Combinable(prasad) and Cure(prasad, saunders) and forall x (Combinable(x) and Cure(x, saunders) -> Arctic(x)) -> therefore Arctic(prasad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The sabine is abhorrent. The sabine is dispirited. The sabine mouth the bartie. The thomasina wamble the bartie. The thomasina is dispirited. The thomasina mouth the sabine. The thomasina mouth the bartie. The bartie is codified. The bartie mouth the thomasina. The bartie entangle the sabine. If something entangle the sabine then the sabine entangle the thomasina. If something is abhorrent and it entangle the thomasina then it is taliped. The bartie is not taliped.", "logic": "\nAbhorrent(sabine)\nDispirited(sabine)\nMouth(sabine, bartie)\nWamble(thomasina, bartie)\nDispirited(thomasina)\nMouth(thomasina, sabine)\nMouth(thomasina, bartie)\nCodified(bartie)\nMouth(bartie, thomasina)\nEntangle(bartie, sabine)\nforall x (Entangle(x, sabine) -> Entangle(sabine, thomasina))\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) and Entangle(x, thomasina) -> Taliped(x))\n\nnot Taliped(bartie)\n\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) and Entangle(x, thomasina) -> Taliped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The johannes is ellipsoid. The johannes is regal. The johannes carry the ham. The rosemaria bushwhack the ham. The rosemaria is regal. The rosemaria carry the johannes. The rosemaria carry the ham. The ham is habitual. The ham carry the rosemaria. The ham prohibit the johannes. If something prohibit the johannes then the johannes prohibit the rosemaria. If something is ellipsoid and it prohibit the rosemaria then it is packable. The rosemaria is packable.", "logic": "\nEllipsoid(johannes)\nRegal(johannes)\nCarry(johannes, ham)\nBushwhack(rosemaria, ham)\nRegal(rosemaria)\nCarry(rosemaria, johannes)\nCarry(rosemaria, ham)\nHabitual(ham)\nCarry(ham, rosemaria)\nProhibit(ham, johannes)\nforall x (Prohibit(x, johannes) -> Prohibit(johannes, rosemaria))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Prohibit(x, rosemaria) -> Packable(x))\n\nPackable(rosemaria)\n\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Prohibit(x, rosemaria) -> Packable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The cindelyn is boundless. The cindelyn is unmown. The cindelyn whang the laverne. The margarete preachify the laverne. The margarete is unmown. The margarete whang the cindelyn. The margarete whang the laverne. The laverne is nourishing. The laverne whang the margarete. The laverne overpay the cindelyn. If something overpay the cindelyn then the cindelyn overpay the margarete. If something is boundless and it overpay the margarete then it is acold. The cindelyn does not eat the laverne.", "logic": "\nBoundless(cindelyn)\nUnmown(cindelyn)\nWhang(cindelyn, laverne)\nPreachify(margarete, laverne)\nUnmown(margarete)\nWhang(margarete, cindelyn)\nWhang(margarete, laverne)\nNourishing(laverne)\nWhang(laverne, margarete)\nOverpay(laverne, cindelyn)\nforall x (Overpay(x, cindelyn) -> Overpay(cindelyn, margarete))\nforall x (Boundless(x) and Overpay(x, margarete) -> Acold(x))\n\nnot Preachify(cindelyn, laverne)\n\nnot Preachify(cindelyn, laverne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The lucila is terrific. The lucila is arthritic. The lucila suffuse the dasi. The ethelin metricize the dasi. The ethelin is arthritic. The ethelin suffuse the lucila. The ethelin suffuse the dasi. The dasi is shaved. The dasi suffuse the ethelin. The dasi flump the lucila. If something flump the lucila then the lucila flump the ethelin. If something is terrific and it flump the ethelin then it is floppy. The dasi suffuse the dasi.", "logic": "\nTerrific(lucila)\nArthritic(lucila)\nSuffuse(lucila, dasi)\nMetricize(ethelin, dasi)\nArthritic(ethelin)\nSuffuse(ethelin, lucila)\nSuffuse(ethelin, dasi)\nShaved(dasi)\nSuffuse(dasi, ethelin)\nFlump(dasi, lucila)\nforall x (Flump(x, lucila) -> Flump(lucila, ethelin))\nforall x (Terrific(x) and Flump(x, ethelin) -> Floppy(x))\n\nSuffuse(dasi, dasi)\n\nSuffuse(dasi, dasi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The natka is tilted. The natka is master. The natka grind the karine. The mamie confine the karine. The mamie is master. The mamie grind the natka. The mamie grind the karine. The karine is balky. The karine grind the mamie. The karine kindle the natka. If something kindle the natka then the natka kindle the mamie. If something is tilted and it kindle the mamie then it is unplumbed. The mamie does not eat the mamie.", "logic": "\nTilted(natka)\nMaster(natka)\nGrind(natka, karine)\nConfine(mamie, karine)\nMaster(mamie)\nGrind(mamie, natka)\nGrind(mamie, karine)\nBalky(karine)\nGrind(karine, mamie)\nKindle(karine, natka)\nforall x (Kindle(x, natka) -> Kindle(natka, mamie))\nforall x (Tilted(x) and Kindle(x, mamie) -> Unplumbed(x))\n\nnot Confine(mamie, mamie)\n\nnot Confine(mamie, mamie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The izzi is occipital. The izzi is candent. The izzi populate the abbott. The fifi frog the abbott. The fifi is candent. The fifi populate the izzi. The fifi populate the abbott. The abbott is unrepaired. The abbott populate the fifi. The abbott opine the izzi. If something opine the izzi then the izzi opine the fifi. If something is occipital and it opine the fifi then it is huxleyan. The fifi is unrepaired.", "logic": "\nOccipital(izzi)\nCandent(izzi)\nPopulate(izzi, abbott)\nFrog(fifi, abbott)\nCandent(fifi)\nPopulate(fifi, izzi)\nPopulate(fifi, abbott)\nUnrepaired(abbott)\nPopulate(abbott, fifi)\nOpine(abbott, izzi)\nforall x (Opine(x, izzi) -> Opine(izzi, fifi))\nforall x (Occipital(x) and Opine(x, fifi) -> Huxleyan(x))\n\nUnrepaired(fifi)\n\nUnrepaired(fifi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "Emily is euphonous. Emily is pasted. Emily is unlobed. Lilias is euphonous. Lilias is bronze. Lilias is obscene. Lilias is rapt. All puppylike people are rapt. All euphonous, puppylike people are pasted. White, euphonous people are pasted. White people are obscene. All euphonous, puppylike people are pasted. All pasted people are unlobed. Nice people are euphonous. If Lilias is bronze then Lilias is euphonous. Emily is euphonous.", "logic": "\nEuphonous(emily)\nPasted(emily)\nUnlobed(emily)\nEuphonous(lilias)\nBronze(lilias)\nObscene(lilias)\nRapt(lilias)\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> Rapt(x))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and Puppylike(x) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Rapt(x) and Euphonous(x) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Obscene(x))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and Puppylike(x) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Pasted(x) -> Unlobed(x))\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nBronze(lilias) -> Euphonous(lilias)\n\nEuphonous(emily)\n\ntherefore Euphonous(emily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Sheree is inflected. Sheree is ruffianly. Sheree is corneal. Parsifal is inflected. Parsifal is untreated. Parsifal is blebbed. Parsifal is activating. All disliked people are activating. All inflected, disliked people are ruffianly. White, inflected people are ruffianly. White people are blebbed. All inflected, disliked people are ruffianly. All ruffianly people are corneal. Nice people are inflected. If Parsifal is untreated then Parsifal is inflected. Parsifal is not untreated.", "logic": "\nInflected(sheree)\nRuffianly(sheree)\nCorneal(sheree)\nInflected(parsifal)\nUntreated(parsifal)\nBlebbed(parsifal)\nActivating(parsifal)\nforall x (Disliked(x) -> Activating(x))\nforall x (Inflected(x) and Disliked(x) -> Ruffianly(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) and Inflected(x) -> Ruffianly(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) -> Blebbed(x))\nforall x (Inflected(x) and Disliked(x) -> Ruffianly(x))\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) -> Corneal(x))\nforall x (Disliked(x) -> Inflected(x))\nUntreated(parsifal) -> Inflected(parsifal)\n\nnot Untreated(parsifal)\n\ntherefore Untreated(parsifal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Dulcy is chargeable. Dulcy is aggravated. Dulcy is freelance. Lisabeth is chargeable. Lisabeth is miniature. Lisabeth is immanent. Lisabeth is pulmonary. All frothing people are pulmonary. All chargeable, frothing people are aggravated. White, chargeable people are aggravated. White people are immanent. All chargeable, frothing people are aggravated. All aggravated people are freelance. Nice people are chargeable. If Lisabeth is miniature then Lisabeth is chargeable. Lisabeth is aggravated.", "logic": "\nChargeable(dulcy)\nAggravated(dulcy)\nFreelance(dulcy)\nChargeable(lisabeth)\nMiniature(lisabeth)\nImmanent(lisabeth)\nPulmonary(lisabeth)\nforall x (Frothing(x) -> Pulmonary(x))\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and Frothing(x) -> Aggravated(x))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Chargeable(x) -> Aggravated(x))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) -> Immanent(x))\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and Frothing(x) -> Aggravated(x))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Frothing(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nMiniature(lisabeth) -> Chargeable(lisabeth)\n\nAggravated(lisabeth)\n\nPulmonary(lisabeth) and Chargeable(lisabeth) and forall x (Pulmonary(x) and Chargeable(x) -> Aggravated(x)) -> therefore Aggravated(lisabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Randene is artful. Randene is vestibular. Randene is appareled. Xenos is artful. Xenos is sprawly. Xenos is geophytic. Xenos is aurorean. All erect people are aurorean. All artful, erect people are vestibular. White, artful people are vestibular. White people are geophytic. All artful, erect people are vestibular. All vestibular people are appareled. Nice people are artful. If Xenos is sprawly then Xenos is artful. Xenos is not vestibular.", "logic": "\nArtful(randene)\nVestibular(randene)\nAppareled(randene)\nArtful(xenos)\nSprawly(xenos)\nGeophytic(xenos)\nAurorean(xenos)\nforall x (Erect(x) -> Aurorean(x))\nforall x (Artful(x) and Erect(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) and Artful(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) -> Geophytic(x))\nforall x (Artful(x) and Erect(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Vestibular(x) -> Appareled(x))\nforall x (Erect(x) -> Artful(x))\nSprawly(xenos) -> Artful(xenos)\n\nnot Vestibular(xenos)\n\nAurorean(xenos) and Artful(xenos) and forall x (Aurorean(x) and Artful(x) -> Vestibular(x)) -> therefore Vestibular(xenos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Jordana is monogamous. Jordana is standpat. Jordana is discovered. Jake is monogamous. Jake is barbaric. Jake is ratable. Jake is eventual. All unhinged people are eventual. All monogamous, unhinged people are standpat. White, monogamous people are standpat. White people are ratable. All monogamous, unhinged people are standpat. All standpat people are discovered. Nice people are monogamous. If Jake is barbaric then Jake is monogamous. Jake is discovered.", "logic": "\nMonogamous(jordana)\nStandpat(jordana)\nDiscovered(jordana)\nMonogamous(jake)\nBarbaric(jake)\nRatable(jake)\nEventual(jake)\nforall x (Unhinged(x) -> Eventual(x))\nforall x (Monogamous(x) and Unhinged(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Eventual(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Eventual(x) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Monogamous(x) and Unhinged(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Standpat(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Unhinged(x) -> Monogamous(x))\nBarbaric(jake) -> Monogamous(jake)\n\nDiscovered(jake)\n\nEventual(jake) and Monogamous(jake) and forall x (Eventual(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Standpat(x)) -> therefore Standpat(jake) Standpat(jake) and forall x (Standpat(x) -> Discovered(x)) -> therefore Discovered(jake)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Fawna is meritable. Fawna is tannish. Fawna is fine. Uriah is meritable. Uriah is apian. Uriah is propellant. Uriah is uninformed. All moderating people are uninformed. All meritable, moderating people are tannish. White, meritable people are tannish. White people are propellant. All meritable, moderating people are tannish. All tannish people are fine. Nice people are meritable. If Uriah is apian then Uriah is meritable. Uriah is not fine.", "logic": "\nMeritable(fawna)\nTannish(fawna)\nFine(fawna)\nMeritable(uriah)\nApian(uriah)\nPropellant(uriah)\nUninformed(uriah)\nforall x (Moderating(x) -> Uninformed(x))\nforall x (Meritable(x) and Moderating(x) -> Tannish(x))\nforall x (Uninformed(x) and Meritable(x) -> Tannish(x))\nforall x (Uninformed(x) -> Propellant(x))\nforall x (Meritable(x) and Moderating(x) -> Tannish(x))\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Fine(x))\nforall x (Moderating(x) -> Meritable(x))\nApian(uriah) -> Meritable(uriah)\n\nnot Fine(uriah)\n\nUninformed(uriah) and Meritable(uriah) and forall x (Uninformed(x) and Meritable(x) -> Tannish(x)) -> therefore Tannish(uriah) Tannish(uriah) and forall x (Tannish(x) -> Fine(x)) -> therefore Fine(uriah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Inci is arcuate. Inci is heartless. Inci is anhydrous. Wallis is arcuate. Wallis is projected. Wallis is wounding. Wallis is homophobic. All surplus people are homophobic. All arcuate, surplus people are heartless. White, arcuate people are heartless. White people are wounding. All arcuate, surplus people are heartless. All heartless people are anhydrous. Nice people are arcuate. If Wallis is projected then Wallis is arcuate. Inci is not homophobic.", "logic": "\nArcuate(inci)\nHeartless(inci)\nAnhydrous(inci)\nArcuate(wallis)\nProjected(wallis)\nWounding(wallis)\nHomophobic(wallis)\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Homophobic(x))\nforall x (Arcuate(x) and Surplus(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) and Arcuate(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Wounding(x))\nforall x (Arcuate(x) and Surplus(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Heartless(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Arcuate(x))\nProjected(wallis) -> Arcuate(wallis)\n\nnot Homophobic(inci)\n\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Homophobic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Germaine is fistulous. Germaine is stillborn. Germaine is tested. Zonnya is fistulous. Zonnya is slatternly. Zonnya is hairless. Zonnya is rapacious. All cismontane people are rapacious. All fistulous, cismontane people are stillborn. White, fistulous people are stillborn. White people are hairless. All fistulous, cismontane people are stillborn. All stillborn people are tested. Nice people are fistulous. If Zonnya is slatternly then Zonnya is fistulous. Germaine is hairless.", "logic": "\nFistulous(germaine)\nStillborn(germaine)\nTested(germaine)\nFistulous(zonnya)\nSlatternly(zonnya)\nHairless(zonnya)\nRapacious(zonnya)\nforall x (Cismontane(x) -> Rapacious(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) and Cismontane(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Rapacious(x) and Fistulous(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Rapacious(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) and Cismontane(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Tested(x))\nforall x (Cismontane(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nSlatternly(zonnya) -> Fistulous(zonnya)\n\nHairless(germaine)\n\nforall x (Rapacious(x) -> Hairless(x)) <- forall x (Cismontane(x) -> Rapacious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Selena is acerose. Selena is gushy. Selena is hobnailed. Davide is acerose. Davide is delightful. Davide is bonnie. Davide is vulgar. All melanesian people are vulgar. All acerose, melanesian people are gushy. White, acerose people are gushy. White people are bonnie. All acerose, melanesian people are gushy. All gushy people are hobnailed. Nice people are acerose. If Davide is delightful then Davide is acerose. Selena is not delightful.", "logic": "\nAcerose(selena)\nGushy(selena)\nHobnailed(selena)\nAcerose(davide)\nDelightful(davide)\nBonnie(davide)\nVulgar(davide)\nforall x (Melanesian(x) -> Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Acerose(x) and Melanesian(x) -> Gushy(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) and Acerose(x) -> Gushy(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Bonnie(x))\nforall x (Acerose(x) and Melanesian(x) -> Gushy(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) -> Acerose(x))\nDelightful(davide) -> Acerose(davide)\n\nnot Delightful(selena)\n\nnot Delightful(selena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Fanechka is armorial. Fanechka is abuzz. Fanechka is bronzed. Corene is armorial. Corene is contiguous. Corene is biparous. Corene is farfetched. All javan people are farfetched. All armorial, javan people are abuzz. White, armorial people are abuzz. White people are biparous. All armorial, javan people are abuzz. All abuzz people are bronzed. Nice people are armorial. If Corene is contiguous then Corene is armorial. Corene is javan.", "logic": "\nArmorial(fanechka)\nAbuzz(fanechka)\nBronzed(fanechka)\nArmorial(corene)\nContiguous(corene)\nBiparous(corene)\nFarfetched(corene)\nforall x (Javan(x) -> Farfetched(x))\nforall x (Armorial(x) and Javan(x) -> Abuzz(x))\nforall x (Farfetched(x) and Armorial(x) -> Abuzz(x))\nforall x (Farfetched(x) -> Biparous(x))\nforall x (Armorial(x) and Javan(x) -> Abuzz(x))\nforall x (Abuzz(x) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Javan(x) -> Armorial(x))\nContiguous(corene) -> Armorial(corene)\n\nJavan(corene)\n\nJavan(corene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2060"} {"premises": "Rollin is crazy. Rollin is theistical. Rollin is ethnologic. Rollin is slavelike. Goldie is crazy. Goldie is cyrillic. Goldie is slavelike. If someone is theistical and unshapely then they are crazy. If someone is merited and ethnologic then they are cyrillic. All ethnologic people are theistical. All theistical people are unshapely. If Rollin is theistical and Rollin is unshapely then Rollin is cyrillic. All unshapely, crazy people are slavelike. Rollin is ethnologic.", "logic": "\nCrazy(rollin)\nTheistical(rollin)\nEthnologic(rollin)\nSlavelike(rollin)\nCrazy(goldie)\nCyrillic(goldie)\nSlavelike(goldie)\nforall x (Theistical(x) and Unshapely(x) -> Crazy(x))\nforall x (Merited(x) and Ethnologic(x) -> Cyrillic(x))\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> Theistical(x))\nforall x (Theistical(x) -> Unshapely(x))\nTheistical(rollin) and Unshapely(rollin) -> Cyrillic(rollin)\nforall x (Unshapely(x) and Crazy(x) -> Slavelike(x))\n\nEthnologic(rollin)\n\ntherefore Ethnologic(rollin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Mahmoud is banal. Mahmoud is draped. Mahmoud is plethoric. Mahmoud is trig. Neel is banal. Neel is maximizing. Neel is trig. If someone is draped and toneless then they are banal. If someone is danish and plethoric then they are maximizing. All plethoric people are draped. All draped people are toneless. If Mahmoud is draped and Mahmoud is toneless then Mahmoud is maximizing. All toneless, banal people are trig. Neel is not trig.", "logic": "\nBanal(mahmoud)\nDraped(mahmoud)\nPlethoric(mahmoud)\nTrig(mahmoud)\nBanal(neel)\nMaximizing(neel)\nTrig(neel)\nforall x (Draped(x) and Toneless(x) -> Banal(x))\nforall x (Danish(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Maximizing(x))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Draped(x))\nforall x (Draped(x) -> Toneless(x))\nDraped(mahmoud) and Toneless(mahmoud) -> Maximizing(mahmoud)\nforall x (Toneless(x) and Banal(x) -> Trig(x))\n\nnot Trig(neel)\n\ntherefore Trig(neel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Dulcie is textured. Dulcie is ataractic. Dulcie is choppy. Dulcie is clement. Maddy is textured. Maddy is cytolytic. Maddy is clement. If someone is ataractic and cluttered then they are textured. If someone is undefended and choppy then they are cytolytic. All choppy people are ataractic. All ataractic people are cluttered. If Dulcie is ataractic and Dulcie is cluttered then Dulcie is cytolytic. All cluttered, textured people are clement. Dulcie is cluttered.", "logic": "\nTextured(dulcie)\nAtaractic(dulcie)\nChoppy(dulcie)\nClement(dulcie)\nTextured(maddy)\nCytolytic(maddy)\nClement(maddy)\nforall x (Ataractic(x) and Cluttered(x) -> Textured(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) and Choppy(x) -> Cytolytic(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Ataractic(x) -> Cluttered(x))\nAtaractic(dulcie) and Cluttered(dulcie) -> Cytolytic(dulcie)\nforall x (Cluttered(x) and Textured(x) -> Clement(x))\n\nCluttered(dulcie)\n\nAtaractic(dulcie) and forall x (Ataractic(x) -> Cluttered(x)) -> therefore Cluttered(dulcie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Dove is bulky. Dove is seamy. Dove is specular. Dove is oldline. Monique is bulky. Monique is coincident. Monique is oldline. If someone is seamy and phrenic then they are bulky. If someone is personal and specular then they are coincident. All specular people are seamy. All seamy people are phrenic. If Dove is seamy and Dove is phrenic then Dove is coincident. All phrenic, bulky people are oldline. Dove is not phrenic.", "logic": "\nBulky(dove)\nSeamy(dove)\nSpecular(dove)\nOldline(dove)\nBulky(monique)\nCoincident(monique)\nOldline(monique)\nforall x (Seamy(x) and Phrenic(x) -> Bulky(x))\nforall x (Personal(x) and Specular(x) -> Coincident(x))\nforall x (Specular(x) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nSeamy(dove) and Phrenic(dove) -> Coincident(dove)\nforall x (Phrenic(x) and Bulky(x) -> Oldline(x))\n\nnot Phrenic(dove)\n\nSeamy(dove) and forall x (Seamy(x) -> Phrenic(x)) -> therefore Phrenic(dove)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Joseph is saccharine. Joseph is unseeded. Joseph is lasting. Joseph is stalinist. Elijah is saccharine. Elijah is painful. Elijah is stalinist. If someone is unseeded and crocketed then they are saccharine. If someone is myopathic and lasting then they are painful. All lasting people are unseeded. All unseeded people are crocketed. If Joseph is unseeded and Joseph is crocketed then Joseph is painful. All crocketed, saccharine people are stalinist. Joseph is painful.", "logic": "\nSaccharine(joseph)\nUnseeded(joseph)\nLasting(joseph)\nStalinist(joseph)\nSaccharine(elijah)\nPainful(elijah)\nStalinist(elijah)\nforall x (Unseeded(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Saccharine(x))\nforall x (Myopathic(x) and Lasting(x) -> Painful(x))\nforall x (Lasting(x) -> Unseeded(x))\nforall x (Unseeded(x) -> Crocketed(x))\nUnseeded(joseph) and Crocketed(joseph) -> Painful(joseph)\nforall x (Crocketed(x) and Saccharine(x) -> Stalinist(x))\n\nPainful(joseph)\n\nUnseeded(joseph) and forall x (Unseeded(x) -> Crocketed(x)) -> therefore Crocketed(joseph) Unseeded(joseph) and Crocketed(joseph) and Unseeded(joseph) and Crocketed(joseph) -> Painful(joseph) -> therefore Painful(joseph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Myrtice is consonant. Myrtice is lateen. Myrtice is vital. Myrtice is oratorical. Wren is consonant. Wren is palmlike. Wren is oratorical. If someone is lateen and minus then they are consonant. If someone is umbrageous and vital then they are palmlike. All vital people are lateen. All lateen people are minus. If Myrtice is lateen and Myrtice is minus then Myrtice is palmlike. All minus, consonant people are oratorical. Myrtice is not palmlike.", "logic": "\nConsonant(myrtice)\nLateen(myrtice)\nVital(myrtice)\nOratorical(myrtice)\nConsonant(wren)\nPalmlike(wren)\nOratorical(wren)\nforall x (Lateen(x) and Minus(x) -> Consonant(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Vital(x) -> Palmlike(x))\nforall x (Vital(x) -> Lateen(x))\nforall x (Lateen(x) -> Minus(x))\nLateen(myrtice) and Minus(myrtice) -> Palmlike(myrtice)\nforall x (Minus(x) and Consonant(x) -> Oratorical(x))\n\nnot Palmlike(myrtice)\n\nLateen(myrtice) and forall x (Lateen(x) -> Minus(x)) -> therefore Minus(myrtice) Lateen(myrtice) and Minus(myrtice) and Lateen(myrtice) and Minus(myrtice) -> Palmlike(myrtice) -> therefore Palmlike(myrtice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Sparky is inwrought. Sparky is sociable. Sparky is baseless. Sparky is grouped. Richmond is inwrought. Richmond is modest. Richmond is grouped. If someone is sociable and laboring then they are inwrought. If someone is ambrosian and baseless then they are modest. All baseless people are sociable. All sociable people are laboring. If Sparky is sociable and Sparky is laboring then Sparky is modest. All laboring, inwrought people are grouped. Richmond is not sociable.", "logic": "\nInwrought(sparky)\nSociable(sparky)\nBaseless(sparky)\nGrouped(sparky)\nInwrought(richmond)\nModest(richmond)\nGrouped(richmond)\nforall x (Sociable(x) and Laboring(x) -> Inwrought(x))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) and Baseless(x) -> Modest(x))\nforall x (Baseless(x) -> Sociable(x))\nforall x (Sociable(x) -> Laboring(x))\nSociable(sparky) and Laboring(sparky) -> Modest(sparky)\nforall x (Laboring(x) and Inwrought(x) -> Grouped(x))\n\nnot Sociable(richmond)\n\nforall x (Baseless(x) -> Sociable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Lyda is hardbound. Lyda is gone. Lyda is eighteen. Lyda is unselfish. Brunhilda is hardbound. Brunhilda is forked. Brunhilda is unselfish. If someone is gone and diffusing then they are hardbound. If someone is sugary and eighteen then they are forked. All eighteen people are gone. All gone people are diffusing. If Lyda is gone and Lyda is diffusing then Lyda is forked. All diffusing, hardbound people are unselfish. Brunhilda is diffusing.", "logic": "\nHardbound(lyda)\nGone(lyda)\nEighteen(lyda)\nUnselfish(lyda)\nHardbound(brunhilda)\nForked(brunhilda)\nUnselfish(brunhilda)\nforall x (Gone(x) and Diffusing(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Sugary(x) and Eighteen(x) -> Forked(x))\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Gone(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nGone(lyda) and Diffusing(lyda) -> Forked(lyda)\nforall x (Diffusing(x) and Hardbound(x) -> Unselfish(x))\n\nDiffusing(brunhilda)\n\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Diffusing(x)) <- forall x (Eighteen(x) -> Gone(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Giacomo is metacarpal. Giacomo is hidden. Giacomo is lofty. Giacomo is nightlong. Tod is metacarpal. Tod is faraway. Tod is nightlong. If someone is hidden and mordant then they are metacarpal. If someone is jerkwater and lofty then they are faraway. All lofty people are hidden. All hidden people are mordant. If Giacomo is hidden and Giacomo is mordant then Giacomo is faraway. All mordant, metacarpal people are nightlong. Giacomo is not jerkwater.", "logic": "\nMetacarpal(giacomo)\nHidden(giacomo)\nLofty(giacomo)\nNightlong(giacomo)\nMetacarpal(tod)\nFaraway(tod)\nNightlong(tod)\nforall x (Hidden(x) and Mordant(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) and Lofty(x) -> Faraway(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Hidden(x))\nforall x (Hidden(x) -> Mordant(x))\nHidden(giacomo) and Mordant(giacomo) -> Faraway(giacomo)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Metacarpal(x) -> Nightlong(x))\n\nnot Jerkwater(giacomo)\n\nnot Jerkwater(giacomo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Grissel is subsidised. Grissel is galling. Grissel is chelonian. Grissel is vulvar. Ewan is subsidised. Ewan is bondable. Ewan is vulvar. If someone is galling and sleek then they are subsidised. If someone is deceptive and chelonian then they are bondable. All chelonian people are galling. All galling people are sleek. If Grissel is galling and Grissel is sleek then Grissel is bondable. All sleek, subsidised people are vulvar. Ewan is chelonian.", "logic": "\nSubsidised(grissel)\nGalling(grissel)\nChelonian(grissel)\nVulvar(grissel)\nSubsidised(ewan)\nBondable(ewan)\nVulvar(ewan)\nforall x (Galling(x) and Sleek(x) -> Subsidised(x))\nforall x (Deceptive(x) and Chelonian(x) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Galling(x))\nforall x (Galling(x) -> Sleek(x))\nGalling(grissel) and Sleek(grissel) -> Bondable(grissel)\nforall x (Sleek(x) and Subsidised(x) -> Vulvar(x))\n\nChelonian(ewan)\n\nChelonian(ewan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "The tarrance urticate the celie. The tarrance is frowzled. The tarrance is protestant. The celie is stung. The celie wince the tarrance. The celie gormandise the tarrance. The celie gormandise the harlan. The harlan gormandise the celie. The rosalyn is frowzled. The rosalyn wince the tarrance. The rosalyn gormandise the tarrance. The rosalyn gormandise the celie. If someone gormandise the harlan then they visit the rosalyn. If someone gormandise the rosalyn and the rosalyn gormandise the celie then the rosalyn urticate the celie. The celie wince the tarrance.", "logic": "\nUrticate(tarrance, celie)\nFrowzled(tarrance)\nProtestant(tarrance)\nStung(celie)\nWince(celie, tarrance)\nGormandise(celie, tarrance)\nGormandise(celie, harlan)\nGormandise(harlan, celie)\nFrowzled(rosalyn)\nWince(rosalyn, tarrance)\nGormandise(rosalyn, tarrance)\nGormandise(rosalyn, celie)\nforall x (Gormandise(x, harlan) -> Gormandise(x, rosalyn))\nforall x (Gormandise(x, rosalyn) and Gormandise(rosalyn, celie) -> Urticate(rosalyn, celie))\n\nWince(celie, tarrance)\n\ntherefore Wince(celie, tarrance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The alic enhance the paul. The alic is lxxxii. The alic is acentric. The paul is outlaw. The paul crossbreed the alic. The paul glue the alic. The paul glue the frazier. The frazier glue the paul. The aidan is lxxxii. The aidan crossbreed the alic. The aidan glue the alic. The aidan glue the paul. If someone glue the frazier then they visit the aidan. If someone glue the aidan and the aidan glue the paul then the aidan enhance the paul. The paul does not need the alic.", "logic": "\nEnhance(alic, paul)\nLxxxii(alic)\nAcentric(alic)\nOutlaw(paul)\nCrossbreed(paul, alic)\nGlue(paul, alic)\nGlue(paul, frazier)\nGlue(frazier, paul)\nLxxxii(aidan)\nCrossbreed(aidan, alic)\nGlue(aidan, alic)\nGlue(aidan, paul)\nforall x (Glue(x, frazier) -> Glue(x, aidan))\nforall x (Glue(x, aidan) and Glue(aidan, paul) -> Enhance(aidan, paul))\n\nnot Crossbreed(paul, alic)\n\ntherefore Crossbreed(paul, alic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The virgilio plastinate the conrad. The virgilio is mercuric. The virgilio is dependable. The conrad is tiny. The conrad flutter the virgilio. The conrad destain the virgilio. The conrad destain the sheryl. The sheryl destain the conrad. The seymour is mercuric. The seymour flutter the virgilio. The seymour destain the virgilio. The seymour destain the conrad. If someone destain the sheryl then they visit the seymour. If someone destain the seymour and the seymour destain the conrad then the seymour plastinate the conrad. The conrad destain the seymour.", "logic": "\nPlastinate(virgilio, conrad)\nMercuric(virgilio)\nDependable(virgilio)\nTiny(conrad)\nFlutter(conrad, virgilio)\nDestain(conrad, virgilio)\nDestain(conrad, sheryl)\nDestain(sheryl, conrad)\nMercuric(seymour)\nFlutter(seymour, virgilio)\nDestain(seymour, virgilio)\nDestain(seymour, conrad)\nforall x (Destain(x, sheryl) -> Destain(x, seymour))\nforall x (Destain(x, seymour) and Destain(seymour, conrad) -> Plastinate(seymour, conrad))\n\nDestain(conrad, seymour)\n\nDestain(conrad, sheryl) and forall x (Destain(x, sheryl) -> Destain(x, seymour)) -> therefore Destain(conrad, seymour)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The franny nock the cresa. The franny is geophytic. The franny is acronymous. The cresa is emphasised. The cresa wield the franny. The cresa undertake the franny. The cresa undertake the queenie. The queenie undertake the cresa. The annelise is geophytic. The annelise wield the franny. The annelise undertake the franny. The annelise undertake the cresa. If someone undertake the queenie then they visit the annelise. If someone undertake the annelise and the annelise undertake the cresa then the annelise nock the cresa. The cresa does not visit the annelise.", "logic": "\nNock(franny, cresa)\nGeophytic(franny)\nAcronymous(franny)\nEmphasised(cresa)\nWield(cresa, franny)\nUndertake(cresa, franny)\nUndertake(cresa, queenie)\nUndertake(queenie, cresa)\nGeophytic(annelise)\nWield(annelise, franny)\nUndertake(annelise, franny)\nUndertake(annelise, cresa)\nforall x (Undertake(x, queenie) -> Undertake(x, annelise))\nforall x (Undertake(x, annelise) and Undertake(annelise, cresa) -> Nock(annelise, cresa))\n\nnot Undertake(cresa, annelise)\n\nUndertake(cresa, queenie) and forall x (Undertake(x, queenie) -> Undertake(x, annelise)) -> therefore Undertake(cresa, annelise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The dov overtop the izzy. The dov is armless. The dov is footloose. The izzy is antidotal. The izzy festoon the dov. The izzy decease the dov. The izzy decease the beatriz. The beatriz decease the izzy. The hester is armless. The hester festoon the dov. The hester decease the dov. The hester decease the izzy. If someone decease the beatriz then they visit the hester. If someone decease the hester and the hester decease the izzy then the hester overtop the izzy. The hester overtop the izzy.", "logic": "\nOvertop(dov, izzy)\nArmless(dov)\nFootloose(dov)\nAntidotal(izzy)\nFestoon(izzy, dov)\nDecease(izzy, dov)\nDecease(izzy, beatriz)\nDecease(beatriz, izzy)\nArmless(hester)\nFestoon(hester, dov)\nDecease(hester, dov)\nDecease(hester, izzy)\nforall x (Decease(x, beatriz) -> Decease(x, hester))\nforall x (Decease(x, hester) and Decease(hester, izzy) -> Overtop(hester, izzy))\n\nOvertop(hester, izzy)\n\nDecease(izzy, beatriz) and forall x (Decease(x, beatriz) -> Decease(x, hester)) -> therefore Decease(izzy, hester) Decease(izzy, hester) and Decease(hester, izzy) and forall x (Decease(x, hester) and Decease(hester, izzy) -> Overtop(hester, izzy)) -> therefore Overtop(hester, izzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The lurlene disconcert the shep. The lurlene is unengaged. The lurlene is isomorphic. The shep is amygdaloid. The shep sunder the lurlene. The shep resublime the lurlene. The shep resublime the jeb. The jeb resublime the shep. The carena is unengaged. The carena sunder the lurlene. The carena resublime the lurlene. The carena resublime the shep. If someone resublime the jeb then they visit the carena. If someone resublime the carena and the carena resublime the shep then the carena disconcert the shep. The carena does not chase the shep.", "logic": "\nDisconcert(lurlene, shep)\nUnengaged(lurlene)\nIsomorphic(lurlene)\nAmygdaloid(shep)\nSunder(shep, lurlene)\nResublime(shep, lurlene)\nResublime(shep, jeb)\nResublime(jeb, shep)\nUnengaged(carena)\nSunder(carena, lurlene)\nResublime(carena, lurlene)\nResublime(carena, shep)\nforall x (Resublime(x, jeb) -> Resublime(x, carena))\nforall x (Resublime(x, carena) and Resublime(carena, shep) -> Disconcert(carena, shep))\n\nnot Disconcert(carena, shep)\n\nResublime(shep, jeb) and forall x (Resublime(x, jeb) -> Resublime(x, carena)) -> therefore Resublime(shep, carena) Resublime(shep, carena) and Resublime(carena, shep) and forall x (Resublime(x, carena) and Resublime(carena, shep) -> Disconcert(carena, shep)) -> therefore Disconcert(carena, shep)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The peyter tissue the orelee. The peyter is adapted. The peyter is charming. The orelee is unleavened. The orelee cohere the peyter. The orelee ante the peyter. The orelee ante the odetta. The odetta ante the orelee. The mellisent is adapted. The mellisent cohere the peyter. The mellisent ante the peyter. The mellisent ante the orelee. If someone ante the odetta then they visit the mellisent. If someone ante the mellisent and the mellisent ante the orelee then the mellisent tissue the orelee. The peyter does not visit the mellisent.", "logic": "\nTissue(peyter, orelee)\nAdapted(peyter)\nCharming(peyter)\nUnleavened(orelee)\nCohere(orelee, peyter)\nAnte(orelee, peyter)\nAnte(orelee, odetta)\nAnte(odetta, orelee)\nAdapted(mellisent)\nCohere(mellisent, peyter)\nAnte(mellisent, peyter)\nAnte(mellisent, orelee)\nforall x (Ante(x, odetta) -> Ante(x, mellisent))\nforall x (Ante(x, mellisent) and Ante(mellisent, orelee) -> Tissue(mellisent, orelee))\n\nnot Ante(peyter, mellisent)\n\nforall x (Ante(x, odetta) -> Ante(x, mellisent)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The ursola delight the aila. The ursola is vanilla. The ursola is tuscan. The aila is passable. The aila experiment the ursola. The aila splutter the ursola. The aila splutter the carolynn. The carolynn splutter the aila. The wald is vanilla. The wald experiment the ursola. The wald splutter the ursola. The wald splutter the aila. If someone splutter the carolynn then they visit the wald. If someone splutter the wald and the wald splutter the aila then the wald delight the aila. The wald splutter the wald.", "logic": "\nDelight(ursola, aila)\nVanilla(ursola)\nTuscan(ursola)\nPassable(aila)\nExperiment(aila, ursola)\nSplutter(aila, ursola)\nSplutter(aila, carolynn)\nSplutter(carolynn, aila)\nVanilla(wald)\nExperiment(wald, ursola)\nSplutter(wald, ursola)\nSplutter(wald, aila)\nforall x (Splutter(x, carolynn) -> Splutter(x, wald))\nforall x (Splutter(x, wald) and Splutter(wald, aila) -> Delight(wald, aila))\n\nSplutter(wald, wald)\n\nforall x (Splutter(x, carolynn) -> Splutter(x, wald)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The clari sulfur the leonidas. The clari is anguished. The clari is homing. The leonidas is unfeasible. The leonidas bind the clari. The leonidas inhale the clari. The leonidas inhale the shepard. The shepard inhale the leonidas. The brigitte is anguished. The brigitte bind the clari. The brigitte inhale the clari. The brigitte inhale the leonidas. If someone inhale the shepard then they visit the brigitte. If someone inhale the brigitte and the brigitte inhale the leonidas then the brigitte sulfur the leonidas. The shepard does not visit the brigitte.", "logic": "\nSulfur(clari, leonidas)\nAnguished(clari)\nHoming(clari)\nUnfeasible(leonidas)\nBind(leonidas, clari)\nInhale(leonidas, clari)\nInhale(leonidas, shepard)\nInhale(shepard, leonidas)\nAnguished(brigitte)\nBind(brigitte, clari)\nInhale(brigitte, clari)\nInhale(brigitte, leonidas)\nforall x (Inhale(x, shepard) -> Inhale(x, brigitte))\nforall x (Inhale(x, brigitte) and Inhale(brigitte, leonidas) -> Sulfur(brigitte, leonidas))\n\nnot Inhale(shepard, brigitte)\n\nforall x (Inhale(x, shepard) -> Inhale(x, brigitte)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The titus mulct the mason. The titus is native. The titus is syntactic. The mason is oleophilic. The mason reproof the titus. The mason disgruntle the titus. The mason disgruntle the steffi. The steffi disgruntle the mason. The wheeler is native. The wheeler reproof the titus. The wheeler disgruntle the titus. The wheeler disgruntle the mason. If someone disgruntle the steffi then they visit the wheeler. If someone disgruntle the wheeler and the wheeler disgruntle the mason then the wheeler mulct the mason. The wheeler reproof the mason.", "logic": "\nMulct(titus, mason)\nNative(titus)\nSyntactic(titus)\nOleophilic(mason)\nReproof(mason, titus)\nDisgruntle(mason, titus)\nDisgruntle(mason, steffi)\nDisgruntle(steffi, mason)\nNative(wheeler)\nReproof(wheeler, titus)\nDisgruntle(wheeler, titus)\nDisgruntle(wheeler, mason)\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, steffi) -> Disgruntle(x, wheeler))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, wheeler) and Disgruntle(wheeler, mason) -> Mulct(wheeler, mason))\n\nReproof(wheeler, mason)\n\nReproof(wheeler, mason) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The donia prepay the tedra. The donia is recurved. The donia is unfamiliar. The tedra is diverse. The tedra huff the donia. The tedra frame the donia. The tedra frame the rosemaria. The rosemaria frame the tedra. The alton is recurved. The alton huff the donia. The alton frame the donia. The alton frame the tedra. If someone frame the rosemaria then they visit the alton. If someone frame the alton and the alton frame the tedra then the alton prepay the tedra. The donia does not visit the tedra.", "logic": "\nPrepay(donia, tedra)\nRecurved(donia)\nUnfamiliar(donia)\nDiverse(tedra)\nHuff(tedra, donia)\nFrame(tedra, donia)\nFrame(tedra, rosemaria)\nFrame(rosemaria, tedra)\nRecurved(alton)\nHuff(alton, donia)\nFrame(alton, donia)\nFrame(alton, tedra)\nforall x (Frame(x, rosemaria) -> Frame(x, alton))\nforall x (Frame(x, alton) and Frame(alton, tedra) -> Prepay(alton, tedra))\n\nnot Frame(donia, tedra)\n\nnot Frame(donia, tedra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "The jefry arborize the eimile. The jefry is cationic. The jefry is poised. The eimile is rousing. The eimile sideswipe the jefry. The eimile excise the jefry. The eimile excise the kirby. The kirby excise the eimile. The clemence is cationic. The clemence sideswipe the jefry. The clemence excise the jefry. The clemence excise the eimile. If someone excise the kirby then they visit the clemence. If someone excise the clemence and the clemence excise the eimile then the clemence arborize the eimile. The eimile arborize the eimile.", "logic": "\nArborize(jefry, eimile)\nCationic(jefry)\nPoised(jefry)\nRousing(eimile)\nSideswipe(eimile, jefry)\nExcise(eimile, jefry)\nExcise(eimile, kirby)\nExcise(kirby, eimile)\nCationic(clemence)\nSideswipe(clemence, jefry)\nExcise(clemence, jefry)\nExcise(clemence, eimile)\nforall x (Excise(x, kirby) -> Excise(x, clemence))\nforall x (Excise(x, clemence) and Excise(clemence, eimile) -> Arborize(clemence, eimile))\n\nArborize(eimile, eimile)\n\nArborize(eimile, eimile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1887"} {"premises": "Ulrich is bobtail. Edie is bended. Edie is bobtail. Edie is wooded. Edie is florid. Edie is dreaded. Edie is insipid. Doti is wooded. Doti is dreaded. Doti is chainlike. Lanny is bended. Lanny is wooded. Lanny is florid. Lanny is dreaded. Lanny is chainlike. Lanny is insipid. If someone is dreaded then they are bended. All bended people are florid. If Doti is bobtail then Doti is florid. Doti is dreaded.", "logic": "\nBobtail(ulrich)\nBended(edie)\nBobtail(edie)\nWooded(edie)\nFlorid(edie)\nDreaded(edie)\nInsipid(edie)\nWooded(doti)\nDreaded(doti)\nChainlike(doti)\nBended(lanny)\nWooded(lanny)\nFlorid(lanny)\nDreaded(lanny)\nChainlike(lanny)\nInsipid(lanny)\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Bended(x))\nforall x (Bended(x) -> Florid(x))\nBobtail(doti) -> Florid(doti)\n\nDreaded(doti)\n\ntherefore Dreaded(doti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Ardeen is adrift. Stormi is nonnomadic. Stormi is adrift. Stormi is distressed. Stormi is napped. Stormi is manageable. Stormi is fuddled. Natalee is distressed. Natalee is manageable. Natalee is aboriginal. Lynn is nonnomadic. Lynn is distressed. Lynn is napped. Lynn is manageable. Lynn is aboriginal. Lynn is fuddled. If someone is manageable then they are nonnomadic. All nonnomadic people are napped. If Natalee is adrift then Natalee is napped. Stormi is not napped.", "logic": "\nAdrift(ardeen)\nNonnomadic(stormi)\nAdrift(stormi)\nDistressed(stormi)\nNapped(stormi)\nManageable(stormi)\nFuddled(stormi)\nDistressed(natalee)\nManageable(natalee)\nAboriginal(natalee)\nNonnomadic(lynn)\nDistressed(lynn)\nNapped(lynn)\nManageable(lynn)\nAboriginal(lynn)\nFuddled(lynn)\nforall x (Manageable(x) -> Nonnomadic(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Napped(x))\nAdrift(natalee) -> Napped(natalee)\n\nnot Napped(stormi)\n\ntherefore Napped(stormi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Henryetta is damask. Randy is oldline. Randy is damask. Randy is corked. Randy is anthropoid. Randy is teensy. Randy is senecan. Wendeline is corked. Wendeline is teensy. Wendeline is atrophic. Ginni is oldline. Ginni is corked. Ginni is anthropoid. Ginni is teensy. Ginni is atrophic. Ginni is senecan. If someone is teensy then they are oldline. All oldline people are anthropoid. If Wendeline is damask then Wendeline is anthropoid. Wendeline is oldline.", "logic": "\nDamask(henryetta)\nOldline(randy)\nDamask(randy)\nCorked(randy)\nAnthropoid(randy)\nTeensy(randy)\nSenecan(randy)\nCorked(wendeline)\nTeensy(wendeline)\nAtrophic(wendeline)\nOldline(ginni)\nCorked(ginni)\nAnthropoid(ginni)\nTeensy(ginni)\nAtrophic(ginni)\nSenecan(ginni)\nforall x (Teensy(x) -> Oldline(x))\nforall x (Oldline(x) -> Anthropoid(x))\nDamask(wendeline) -> Anthropoid(wendeline)\n\nOldline(wendeline)\n\nTeensy(wendeline) and forall x (Teensy(x) -> Oldline(x)) -> therefore Oldline(wendeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Albatros is astir. Casi is lewd. Casi is astir. Casi is immunized. Casi is innumerous. Casi is pending. Casi is aslant. Joy is immunized. Joy is pending. Joy is puppylike. Worden is lewd. Worden is immunized. Worden is innumerous. Worden is pending. Worden is puppylike. Worden is aslant. If someone is pending then they are lewd. All lewd people are innumerous. If Joy is astir then Joy is innumerous. Joy is not lewd.", "logic": "\nAstir(albatros)\nLewd(casi)\nAstir(casi)\nImmunized(casi)\nInnumerous(casi)\nPending(casi)\nAslant(casi)\nImmunized(joy)\nPending(joy)\nPuppylike(joy)\nLewd(worden)\nImmunized(worden)\nInnumerous(worden)\nPending(worden)\nPuppylike(worden)\nAslant(worden)\nforall x (Pending(x) -> Lewd(x))\nforall x (Lewd(x) -> Innumerous(x))\nAstir(joy) -> Innumerous(joy)\n\nnot Lewd(joy)\n\nPending(joy) and forall x (Pending(x) -> Lewd(x)) -> therefore Lewd(joy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Lazaro is canorous. Bobette is socialist. Bobette is canorous. Bobette is shoreward. Bobette is muzzy. Bobette is beltless. Bobette is puppyish. Chrysa is shoreward. Chrysa is beltless. Chrysa is propellant. Georgeta is socialist. Georgeta is shoreward. Georgeta is muzzy. Georgeta is beltless. Georgeta is propellant. Georgeta is puppyish. If someone is beltless then they are socialist. All socialist people are muzzy. If Chrysa is canorous then Chrysa is muzzy. Chrysa is muzzy.", "logic": "\nCanorous(lazaro)\nSocialist(bobette)\nCanorous(bobette)\nShoreward(bobette)\nMuzzy(bobette)\nBeltless(bobette)\nPuppyish(bobette)\nShoreward(chrysa)\nBeltless(chrysa)\nPropellant(chrysa)\nSocialist(georgeta)\nShoreward(georgeta)\nMuzzy(georgeta)\nBeltless(georgeta)\nPropellant(georgeta)\nPuppyish(georgeta)\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nCanorous(chrysa) -> Muzzy(chrysa)\n\nMuzzy(chrysa)\n\nBeltless(chrysa) and forall x (Beltless(x) -> Socialist(x)) -> therefore Socialist(chrysa) Socialist(chrysa) and forall x (Socialist(x) -> Muzzy(x)) -> therefore Muzzy(chrysa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Janenna is pasteurian. Yonina is dank. Yonina is pasteurian. Yonina is uncommon. Yonina is intriguing. Yonina is dropping. Yonina is woven. Wandie is uncommon. Wandie is dropping. Wandie is lxxiii. Alan is dank. Alan is uncommon. Alan is intriguing. Alan is dropping. Alan is lxxiii. Alan is woven. If someone is dropping then they are dank. All dank people are intriguing. If Wandie is pasteurian then Wandie is intriguing. Wandie is not intriguing.", "logic": "\nPasteurian(janenna)\nDank(yonina)\nPasteurian(yonina)\nUncommon(yonina)\nIntriguing(yonina)\nDropping(yonina)\nWoven(yonina)\nUncommon(wandie)\nDropping(wandie)\nLxxiii(wandie)\nDank(alan)\nUncommon(alan)\nIntriguing(alan)\nDropping(alan)\nLxxiii(alan)\nWoven(alan)\nforall x (Dropping(x) -> Dank(x))\nforall x (Dank(x) -> Intriguing(x))\nPasteurian(wandie) -> Intriguing(wandie)\n\nnot Intriguing(wandie)\n\nDropping(wandie) and forall x (Dropping(x) -> Dank(x)) -> therefore Dank(wandie) Dank(wandie) and forall x (Dank(x) -> Intriguing(x)) -> therefore Intriguing(wandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Jeremy is dandyish. Parry is prescient. Parry is dandyish. Parry is deciphered. Parry is decorous. Parry is taillike. Parry is eighth. Leonid is deciphered. Leonid is taillike. Leonid is barbate. Barris is prescient. Barris is deciphered. Barris is decorous. Barris is taillike. Barris is barbate. Barris is eighth. If someone is taillike then they are prescient. All prescient people are decorous. If Leonid is dandyish then Leonid is decorous. Jeremy is not decorous.", "logic": "\nDandyish(jeremy)\nPrescient(parry)\nDandyish(parry)\nDeciphered(parry)\nDecorous(parry)\nTaillike(parry)\nEighth(parry)\nDeciphered(leonid)\nTaillike(leonid)\nBarbate(leonid)\nPrescient(barris)\nDeciphered(barris)\nDecorous(barris)\nTaillike(barris)\nBarbate(barris)\nEighth(barris)\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Prescient(x))\nforall x (Prescient(x) -> Decorous(x))\nDandyish(leonid) -> Decorous(leonid)\n\nnot Decorous(jeremy)\n\nforall x (Prescient(x) -> Decorous(x)) <- forall x (Taillike(x) -> Prescient(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Sharity is lowest. Westbrook is flush. Westbrook is lowest. Westbrook is petite. Westbrook is goethean. Westbrook is avertable. Westbrook is frizzy. Alvira is petite. Alvira is avertable. Alvira is rheumatoid. Natty is flush. Natty is petite. Natty is goethean. Natty is avertable. Natty is rheumatoid. Natty is frizzy. If someone is avertable then they are flush. All flush people are goethean. If Alvira is lowest then Alvira is goethean. Sharity is flush.", "logic": "\nLowest(sharity)\nFlush(westbrook)\nLowest(westbrook)\nPetite(westbrook)\nGoethean(westbrook)\nAvertable(westbrook)\nFrizzy(westbrook)\nPetite(alvira)\nAvertable(alvira)\nRheumatoid(alvira)\nFlush(natty)\nPetite(natty)\nGoethean(natty)\nAvertable(natty)\nRheumatoid(natty)\nFrizzy(natty)\nforall x (Avertable(x) -> Flush(x))\nforall x (Flush(x) -> Goethean(x))\nLowest(alvira) -> Goethean(alvira)\n\nFlush(sharity)\n\nforall x (Avertable(x) -> Flush(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Berri is viscid. Skipp is broken. Skipp is viscid. Skipp is unequalled. Skipp is glued. Skipp is stunning. Skipp is argentine. Annabelle is unequalled. Annabelle is stunning. Annabelle is merged. Otto is broken. Otto is unequalled. Otto is glued. Otto is stunning. Otto is merged. Otto is argentine. If someone is stunning then they are broken. All broken people are glued. If Annabelle is viscid then Annabelle is glued. Otto is not viscid.", "logic": "\nViscid(berri)\nBroken(skipp)\nViscid(skipp)\nUnequalled(skipp)\nGlued(skipp)\nStunning(skipp)\nArgentine(skipp)\nUnequalled(annabelle)\nStunning(annabelle)\nMerged(annabelle)\nBroken(otto)\nUnequalled(otto)\nGlued(otto)\nStunning(otto)\nMerged(otto)\nArgentine(otto)\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Broken(x) -> Glued(x))\nViscid(annabelle) -> Glued(annabelle)\n\nnot Viscid(otto)\n\nnot Viscid(otto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Harold is cragged. Elvin is stony. Elvin is cragged. Elvin is unbloody. Elvin is jade. Elvin is clubbish. Elvin is debatable. Quinton is unbloody. Quinton is clubbish. Quinton is astir. Alyss is stony. Alyss is unbloody. Alyss is jade. Alyss is clubbish. Alyss is astir. Alyss is debatable. If someone is clubbish then they are stony. All stony people are jade. If Quinton is cragged then Quinton is jade. Harold is astir.", "logic": "\nCragged(harold)\nStony(elvin)\nCragged(elvin)\nUnbloody(elvin)\nJade(elvin)\nClubbish(elvin)\nDebatable(elvin)\nUnbloody(quinton)\nClubbish(quinton)\nAstir(quinton)\nStony(alyss)\nUnbloody(alyss)\nJade(alyss)\nClubbish(alyss)\nAstir(alyss)\nDebatable(alyss)\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Stony(x))\nforall x (Stony(x) -> Jade(x))\nCragged(quinton) -> Jade(quinton)\n\nAstir(harold)\n\nAstir(harold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Carmelita is slain. Alberto is puppyish. Alberto is slain. Alberto is clubbable. Alberto is hilar. Alberto is scrubbed. Alberto is farfetched. Osmond is clubbable. Osmond is scrubbed. Osmond is suboceanic. Jillian is puppyish. Jillian is clubbable. Jillian is hilar. Jillian is scrubbed. Jillian is suboceanic. Jillian is farfetched. If someone is scrubbed then they are puppyish. All puppyish people are hilar. If Osmond is slain then Osmond is hilar. Carmelita is not farfetched.", "logic": "\nSlain(carmelita)\nPuppyish(alberto)\nSlain(alberto)\nClubbable(alberto)\nHilar(alberto)\nScrubbed(alberto)\nFarfetched(alberto)\nClubbable(osmond)\nScrubbed(osmond)\nSuboceanic(osmond)\nPuppyish(jillian)\nClubbable(jillian)\nHilar(jillian)\nScrubbed(jillian)\nSuboceanic(jillian)\nFarfetched(jillian)\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) -> Puppyish(x))\nforall x (Puppyish(x) -> Hilar(x))\nSlain(osmond) -> Hilar(osmond)\n\nnot Farfetched(carmelita)\n\nnot Farfetched(carmelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Maurie is coenobitic. Rolph is flighted. Rolph is coenobitic. Rolph is cogged. Rolph is fanlike. Rolph is disposable. Rolph is solar. Simona is cogged. Simona is disposable. Simona is bovine. Carole is flighted. Carole is cogged. Carole is fanlike. Carole is disposable. Carole is bovine. Carole is solar. If someone is disposable then they are flighted. All flighted people are fanlike. If Simona is coenobitic then Simona is fanlike. Simona is solar.", "logic": "\nCoenobitic(maurie)\nFlighted(rolph)\nCoenobitic(rolph)\nCogged(rolph)\nFanlike(rolph)\nDisposable(rolph)\nSolar(rolph)\nCogged(simona)\nDisposable(simona)\nBovine(simona)\nFlighted(carole)\nCogged(carole)\nFanlike(carole)\nDisposable(carole)\nBovine(carole)\nSolar(carole)\nforall x (Disposable(x) -> Flighted(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) -> Fanlike(x))\nCoenobitic(simona) -> Fanlike(simona)\n\nSolar(simona)\n\nSolar(simona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The ingmar is carious. All flightless things are carious. If something is jain then it is flightless. If the ingmar is flightless then the ingmar is pinkish. If something is carious then it is jain. If something is jain and not carious then it is not pinkish. Nice things are pinkish. If something is jain and carious then it is not seamed. If something is carious and not pinkish then it is not seamed. The ingmar is carious.", "logic": "\nCarious(ingmar)\nforall x (Flightless(x) -> Carious(x))\nforall x (Jain(x) -> Flightless(x))\nFlightless(ingmar) -> Pinkish(ingmar)\nforall x (Carious(x) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Jain(x) and not Carious(x) -> not Pinkish(x))\nforall x (Flightless(x) -> Pinkish(x))\nforall x (Jain(x) and Carious(x) -> not Seamed(x))\nforall x (Carious(x) and not Pinkish(x) -> not Seamed(x))\n\nCarious(ingmar)\n\ntherefore Carious(ingmar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The standford is radiating. All metallike things are radiating. If something is impassable then it is metallike. If the standford is metallike then the standford is prescribed. If something is radiating then it is impassable. If something is impassable and not radiating then it is not prescribed. Nice things are prescribed. If something is impassable and radiating then it is not lepidote. If something is radiating and not prescribed then it is not lepidote. The standford is not radiating.", "logic": "\nRadiating(standford)\nforall x (Metallike(x) -> Radiating(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Metallike(x))\nMetallike(standford) -> Prescribed(standford)\nforall x (Radiating(x) -> Impassable(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) and not Radiating(x) -> not Prescribed(x))\nforall x (Metallike(x) -> Prescribed(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) and Radiating(x) -> not Lepidote(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and not Prescribed(x) -> not Lepidote(x))\n\nnot Radiating(standford)\n\ntherefore Radiating(standford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The pamela is excitable. All unsaid things are excitable. If something is scaly then it is unsaid. If the pamela is unsaid then the pamela is civilized. If something is excitable then it is scaly. If something is scaly and not excitable then it is not civilized. Nice things are civilized. If something is scaly and excitable then it is not endogenous. If something is excitable and not civilized then it is not endogenous. The pamela is scaly.", "logic": "\nExcitable(pamela)\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Excitable(x))\nforall x (Scaly(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nUnsaid(pamela) -> Civilized(pamela)\nforall x (Excitable(x) -> Scaly(x))\nforall x (Scaly(x) and not Excitable(x) -> not Civilized(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Civilized(x))\nforall x (Scaly(x) and Excitable(x) -> not Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Excitable(x) and not Civilized(x) -> not Endogenous(x))\n\nScaly(pamela)\n\nExcitable(pamela) and forall x (Excitable(x) -> Scaly(x)) -> therefore Scaly(pamela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The renato is doped. All lenticular things are doped. If something is liquescent then it is lenticular. If the renato is lenticular then the renato is cubiform. If something is doped then it is liquescent. If something is liquescent and not doped then it is not cubiform. Nice things are cubiform. If something is liquescent and doped then it is not sinusoidal. If something is doped and not cubiform then it is not sinusoidal. The renato is not liquescent.", "logic": "\nDoped(renato)\nforall x (Lenticular(x) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) -> Lenticular(x))\nLenticular(renato) -> Cubiform(renato)\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) and not Doped(x) -> not Cubiform(x))\nforall x (Lenticular(x) -> Cubiform(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) and Doped(x) -> not Sinusoidal(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) and not Cubiform(x) -> not Sinusoidal(x))\n\nnot Liquescent(renato)\n\nDoped(renato) and forall x (Doped(x) -> Liquescent(x)) -> therefore Liquescent(renato)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The quincey is truncated. All mantled things are truncated. If something is limpid then it is mantled. If the quincey is mantled then the quincey is petrous. If something is truncated then it is limpid. If something is limpid and not truncated then it is not petrous. Nice things are petrous. If something is limpid and truncated then it is not balconied. If something is truncated and not petrous then it is not balconied. The quincey is not balconied.", "logic": "\nTruncated(quincey)\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Truncated(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) -> Mantled(x))\nMantled(quincey) -> Petrous(quincey)\nforall x (Truncated(x) -> Limpid(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) and not Truncated(x) -> not Petrous(x))\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Petrous(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) and Truncated(x) -> not Balconied(x))\nforall x (Truncated(x) and not Petrous(x) -> not Balconied(x))\n\nnot Balconied(quincey)\n\nTruncated(quincey) and forall x (Truncated(x) -> Limpid(x)) -> therefore Limpid(quincey) Limpid(quincey) and Truncated(quincey) and forall x (Limpid(x) and Truncated(x) -> not Balconied(x)) -> therefore not Balconied(quincey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The jaquelyn is buddhist. All numidian things are buddhist. If something is astylar then it is numidian. If the jaquelyn is numidian then the jaquelyn is detected. If something is buddhist then it is astylar. If something is astylar and not buddhist then it is not detected. Nice things are detected. If something is astylar and buddhist then it is not shrill. If something is buddhist and not detected then it is not shrill. The jaquelyn is shrill.", "logic": "\nBuddhist(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Numidian(x) -> Buddhist(x))\nforall x (Astylar(x) -> Numidian(x))\nNumidian(jaquelyn) -> Detected(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Buddhist(x) -> Astylar(x))\nforall x (Astylar(x) and not Buddhist(x) -> not Detected(x))\nforall x (Numidian(x) -> Detected(x))\nforall x (Astylar(x) and Buddhist(x) -> not Shrill(x))\nforall x (Buddhist(x) and not Detected(x) -> not Shrill(x))\n\nShrill(jaquelyn)\n\nBuddhist(jaquelyn) and forall x (Buddhist(x) -> Astylar(x)) -> therefore Astylar(jaquelyn) Astylar(jaquelyn) and Buddhist(jaquelyn) and forall x (Astylar(x) and Buddhist(x) -> not Shrill(x)) -> therefore not Shrill(jaquelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The anselma is fifth. All commensal things are fifth. If something is fungicidal then it is commensal. If the anselma is commensal then the anselma is buddhist. If something is fifth then it is fungicidal. If something is fungicidal and not fifth then it is not buddhist. Nice things are buddhist. If something is fungicidal and fifth then it is not writhen. If something is fifth and not buddhist then it is not writhen. The anselma does not like the anselma.", "logic": "\nFifth(anselma)\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Fifth(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Commensal(x))\nCommensal(anselma) -> Buddhist(anselma)\nforall x (Fifth(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) and not Fifth(x) -> not Buddhist(x))\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Buddhist(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) and Fifth(x) -> not Writhen(x))\nforall x (Fifth(x) and not Buddhist(x) -> not Writhen(x))\n\nnot Likes(anselma, anselma)\n\nnot Likes(anselma, anselma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The noe is endergonic. All photic things are endergonic. If something is chaotic then it is photic. If the noe is photic then the noe is unerasable. If something is endergonic then it is chaotic. If something is chaotic and not endergonic then it is not unerasable. Nice things are unerasable. If something is chaotic and endergonic then it is not accordant. If something is endergonic and not unerasable then it is not accordant. The noe eats the noe.", "logic": "\nEndergonic(noe)\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Endergonic(x))\nforall x (Chaotic(x) -> Photic(x))\nPhotic(noe) -> Unerasable(noe)\nforall x (Endergonic(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Chaotic(x) and not Endergonic(x) -> not Unerasable(x))\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Unerasable(x))\nforall x (Chaotic(x) and Endergonic(x) -> not Accordant(x))\nforall x (Endergonic(x) and not Unerasable(x) -> not Accordant(x))\n\nEats(noe, noe)\n\nEats(noe, noe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The selle bloat the ian. The ian is carbolated. The ian is diverse. The ian is penurious. The ian does not need the selle. The ian extract the hartwell. The fanchette is steamed. The fanchette is penurious. The fanchette is factious. The fanchette bloat the selle. The fanchette bloat the hartwell. The fanchette inundate the selle. The fanchette inundate the ian. The fanchette extract the selle. The hartwell is factious. The hartwell does not need the fanchette. If something is carbolated and diverse then it extract the fanchette. Green things are diverse. If something extract the fanchette then it extract the selle. The fanchette extract the selle.", "logic": "\nBloat(selle, ian)\nCarbolated(ian)\nDiverse(ian)\nPenurious(ian)\nnot Inundate(ian, selle)\nExtract(ian, hartwell)\nSteamed(fanchette)\nPenurious(fanchette)\nFactious(fanchette)\nBloat(fanchette, selle)\nBloat(fanchette, hartwell)\nInundate(fanchette, selle)\nInundate(fanchette, ian)\nExtract(fanchette, selle)\nFactious(hartwell)\nnot Inundate(hartwell, fanchette)\nforall x (Carbolated(x) and Diverse(x) -> Extract(x, fanchette))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Diverse(x))\nforall x (Extract(x, fanchette) -> Extract(x, selle))\n\nExtract(fanchette, selle)\n\ntherefore Extract(fanchette, selle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The ninon defat the freeman. The freeman is starchlike. The freeman is prevailing. The freeman is equipt. The freeman does not need the ninon. The freeman rubric the fifine. The stan is pent. The stan is equipt. The stan is legible. The stan defat the ninon. The stan defat the fifine. The stan yellow the ninon. The stan yellow the freeman. The stan rubric the ninon. The fifine is legible. The fifine does not need the stan. If something is starchlike and prevailing then it rubric the stan. Green things are prevailing. If something rubric the stan then it rubric the ninon. The freeman is not prevailing.", "logic": "\nDefat(ninon, freeman)\nStarchlike(freeman)\nPrevailing(freeman)\nEquipt(freeman)\nnot Yellow(freeman, ninon)\nRubric(freeman, fifine)\nPent(stan)\nEquipt(stan)\nLegible(stan)\nDefat(stan, ninon)\nDefat(stan, fifine)\nYellow(stan, ninon)\nYellow(stan, freeman)\nRubric(stan, ninon)\nLegible(fifine)\nnot Yellow(fifine, stan)\nforall x (Starchlike(x) and Prevailing(x) -> Rubric(x, stan))\nforall x (Starchlike(x) -> Prevailing(x))\nforall x (Rubric(x, stan) -> Rubric(x, ninon))\n\nnot Prevailing(freeman)\n\ntherefore Prevailing(freeman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The valentia trivialise the jay. The jay is capped. The jay is unsteady. The jay is adult. The jay does not need the valentia. The jay flump the mauricio. The toddie is befogged. The toddie is adult. The toddie is enfeebling. The toddie trivialise the valentia. The toddie trivialise the mauricio. The toddie deactivate the valentia. The toddie deactivate the jay. The toddie flump the valentia. The mauricio is enfeebling. The mauricio does not need the toddie. If something is capped and unsteady then it flump the toddie. Green things are unsteady. If something flump the toddie then it flump the valentia. The jay flump the toddie.", "logic": "\nTrivialise(valentia, jay)\nCapped(jay)\nUnsteady(jay)\nAdult(jay)\nnot Deactivate(jay, valentia)\nFlump(jay, mauricio)\nBefogged(toddie)\nAdult(toddie)\nEnfeebling(toddie)\nTrivialise(toddie, valentia)\nTrivialise(toddie, mauricio)\nDeactivate(toddie, valentia)\nDeactivate(toddie, jay)\nFlump(toddie, valentia)\nEnfeebling(mauricio)\nnot Deactivate(mauricio, toddie)\nforall x (Capped(x) and Unsteady(x) -> Flump(x, toddie))\nforall x (Capped(x) -> Unsteady(x))\nforall x (Flump(x, toddie) -> Flump(x, valentia))\n\nFlump(jay, toddie)\n\nCapped(jay) and Unsteady(jay) and forall x (Capped(x) and Unsteady(x) -> Flump(x, toddie)) -> therefore Flump(jay, toddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The jodie glide the editha. The editha is hypnotized. The editha is tinny. The editha is wheezy. The editha does not need the jodie. The editha housekeep the alyss. The mallorie is primordial. The mallorie is wheezy. The mallorie is cylindric. The mallorie glide the jodie. The mallorie glide the alyss. The mallorie loose the jodie. The mallorie loose the editha. The mallorie housekeep the jodie. The alyss is cylindric. The alyss does not need the mallorie. If something is hypnotized and tinny then it housekeep the mallorie. Green things are tinny. If something housekeep the mallorie then it housekeep the jodie. The editha does not visit the mallorie.", "logic": "\nGlide(jodie, editha)\nHypnotized(editha)\nTinny(editha)\nWheezy(editha)\nnot Loose(editha, jodie)\nHousekeep(editha, alyss)\nPrimordial(mallorie)\nWheezy(mallorie)\nCylindric(mallorie)\nGlide(mallorie, jodie)\nGlide(mallorie, alyss)\nLoose(mallorie, jodie)\nLoose(mallorie, editha)\nHousekeep(mallorie, jodie)\nCylindric(alyss)\nnot Loose(alyss, mallorie)\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) and Tinny(x) -> Housekeep(x, mallorie))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Tinny(x))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, mallorie) -> Housekeep(x, jodie))\n\nnot Housekeep(editha, mallorie)\n\nHypnotized(editha) and Tinny(editha) and forall x (Hypnotized(x) and Tinny(x) -> Housekeep(x, mallorie)) -> therefore Housekeep(editha, mallorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The adena well the brena. The brena is matey. The brena is furthest. The brena is cranial. The brena does not need the adena. The brena whisk the kimberlyn. The christie is summative. The christie is cranial. The christie is swagger. The christie well the adena. The christie well the kimberlyn. The christie enthuse the adena. The christie enthuse the brena. The christie whisk the adena. The kimberlyn is swagger. The kimberlyn does not need the christie. If something is matey and furthest then it whisk the christie. Green things are furthest. If something whisk the christie then it whisk the adena. The brena whisk the adena.", "logic": "\nWell(adena, brena)\nMatey(brena)\nFurthest(brena)\nCranial(brena)\nnot Enthuse(brena, adena)\nWhisk(brena, kimberlyn)\nSummative(christie)\nCranial(christie)\nSwagger(christie)\nWell(christie, adena)\nWell(christie, kimberlyn)\nEnthuse(christie, adena)\nEnthuse(christie, brena)\nWhisk(christie, adena)\nSwagger(kimberlyn)\nnot Enthuse(kimberlyn, christie)\nforall x (Matey(x) and Furthest(x) -> Whisk(x, christie))\nforall x (Matey(x) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Whisk(x, christie) -> Whisk(x, adena))\n\nWhisk(brena, adena)\n\nMatey(brena) and Furthest(brena) and forall x (Matey(x) and Furthest(x) -> Whisk(x, christie)) -> therefore Whisk(brena, christie) Whisk(brena, christie) and forall x (Whisk(x, christie) -> Whisk(x, adena)) -> therefore Whisk(brena, adena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The miriam manipulate the duffy. The duffy is deist. The duffy is ulterior. The duffy is schismatic. The duffy does not need the miriam. The duffy tape the josefa. The brina is unasked. The brina is schismatic. The brina is effortless. The brina manipulate the miriam. The brina manipulate the josefa. The brina importune the miriam. The brina importune the duffy. The brina tape the miriam. The josefa is effortless. The josefa does not need the brina. If something is deist and ulterior then it tape the brina. Green things are ulterior. If something tape the brina then it tape the miriam. The duffy does not visit the miriam.", "logic": "\nManipulate(miriam, duffy)\nDeist(duffy)\nUlterior(duffy)\nSchismatic(duffy)\nnot Importune(duffy, miriam)\nTape(duffy, josefa)\nUnasked(brina)\nSchismatic(brina)\nEffortless(brina)\nManipulate(brina, miriam)\nManipulate(brina, josefa)\nImportune(brina, miriam)\nImportune(brina, duffy)\nTape(brina, miriam)\nEffortless(josefa)\nnot Importune(josefa, brina)\nforall x (Deist(x) and Ulterior(x) -> Tape(x, brina))\nforall x (Deist(x) -> Ulterior(x))\nforall x (Tape(x, brina) -> Tape(x, miriam))\n\nnot Tape(duffy, miriam)\n\nDeist(duffy) and Ulterior(duffy) and forall x (Deist(x) and Ulterior(x) -> Tape(x, brina)) -> therefore Tape(duffy, brina) Tape(duffy, brina) and forall x (Tape(x, brina) -> Tape(x, miriam)) -> therefore Tape(duffy, miriam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The lily habilitate the gavriel. The gavriel is respectful. The gavriel is activated. The gavriel is accredited. The gavriel does not need the lily. The gavriel bunt the antonia. The prentice is breezy. The prentice is accredited. The prentice is vagabond. The prentice habilitate the lily. The prentice habilitate the antonia. The prentice mind the lily. The prentice mind the gavriel. The prentice bunt the lily. The antonia is vagabond. The antonia does not need the prentice. If something is respectful and activated then it bunt the prentice. Green things are activated. If something bunt the prentice then it bunt the lily. The antonia is not activated.", "logic": "\nHabilitate(lily, gavriel)\nRespectful(gavriel)\nActivated(gavriel)\nAccredited(gavriel)\nnot Mind(gavriel, lily)\nBunt(gavriel, antonia)\nBreezy(prentice)\nAccredited(prentice)\nVagabond(prentice)\nHabilitate(prentice, lily)\nHabilitate(prentice, antonia)\nMind(prentice, lily)\nMind(prentice, gavriel)\nBunt(prentice, lily)\nVagabond(antonia)\nnot Mind(antonia, prentice)\nforall x (Respectful(x) and Activated(x) -> Bunt(x, prentice))\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Bunt(x, prentice) -> Bunt(x, lily))\n\nnot Activated(antonia)\n\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> Activated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The johann petrify the laverna. The laverna is disdainful. The laverna is spermous. The laverna is proved. The laverna does not need the johann. The laverna resinate the berkley. The clarisse is repressive. The clarisse is proved. The clarisse is unsullied. The clarisse petrify the johann. The clarisse petrify the berkley. The clarisse host the johann. The clarisse host the laverna. The clarisse resinate the johann. The berkley is unsullied. The berkley does not need the clarisse. If something is disdainful and spermous then it resinate the clarisse. Green things are spermous. If something resinate the clarisse then it resinate the johann. The berkley resinate the clarisse.", "logic": "\nPetrify(johann, laverna)\nDisdainful(laverna)\nSpermous(laverna)\nProved(laverna)\nnot Host(laverna, johann)\nResinate(laverna, berkley)\nRepressive(clarisse)\nProved(clarisse)\nUnsullied(clarisse)\nPetrify(clarisse, johann)\nPetrify(clarisse, berkley)\nHost(clarisse, johann)\nHost(clarisse, laverna)\nResinate(clarisse, johann)\nUnsullied(berkley)\nnot Host(berkley, clarisse)\nforall x (Disdainful(x) and Spermous(x) -> Resinate(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Disdainful(x) -> Spermous(x))\nforall x (Resinate(x, clarisse) -> Resinate(x, johann))\n\nResinate(berkley, clarisse)\n\nforall x (Disdainful(x) and Spermous(x) -> Resinate(x, clarisse)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The fraser curb the henka. The henka is mauve. The henka is epidural. The henka is omissive. The henka does not need the fraser. The henka unfit the melany. The ernesto is boreal. The ernesto is omissive. The ernesto is clear. The ernesto curb the fraser. The ernesto curb the melany. The ernesto fluoridate the fraser. The ernesto fluoridate the henka. The ernesto unfit the fraser. The melany is clear. The melany does not need the ernesto. If something is mauve and epidural then it unfit the ernesto. Green things are epidural. If something unfit the ernesto then it unfit the fraser. The ernesto does not visit the ernesto.", "logic": "\nCurb(fraser, henka)\nMauve(henka)\nEpidural(henka)\nOmissive(henka)\nnot Fluoridate(henka, fraser)\nUnfit(henka, melany)\nBoreal(ernesto)\nOmissive(ernesto)\nClear(ernesto)\nCurb(ernesto, fraser)\nCurb(ernesto, melany)\nFluoridate(ernesto, fraser)\nFluoridate(ernesto, henka)\nUnfit(ernesto, fraser)\nClear(melany)\nnot Fluoridate(melany, ernesto)\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Epidural(x) -> Unfit(x, ernesto))\nforall x (Mauve(x) -> Epidural(x))\nforall x (Unfit(x, ernesto) -> Unfit(x, fraser))\n\nnot Unfit(ernesto, ernesto)\n\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Epidural(x) -> Unfit(x, ernesto)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The vallie dupe the berrie. The berrie is grotty. The berrie is unfriendly. The berrie is steep. The berrie does not need the vallie. The berrie bucket the leoline. The floris is emphasised. The floris is steep. The floris is nonrandom. The floris dupe the vallie. The floris dupe the leoline. The floris deject the vallie. The floris deject the berrie. The floris bucket the vallie. The leoline is nonrandom. The leoline does not need the floris. If something is grotty and unfriendly then it bucket the floris. Green things are unfriendly. If something bucket the floris then it bucket the vallie. The leoline deject the berrie.", "logic": "\nDupe(vallie, berrie)\nGrotty(berrie)\nUnfriendly(berrie)\nSteep(berrie)\nnot Deject(berrie, vallie)\nBucket(berrie, leoline)\nEmphasised(floris)\nSteep(floris)\nNonrandom(floris)\nDupe(floris, vallie)\nDupe(floris, leoline)\nDeject(floris, vallie)\nDeject(floris, berrie)\nBucket(floris, vallie)\nNonrandom(leoline)\nnot Deject(leoline, floris)\nforall x (Grotty(x) and Unfriendly(x) -> Bucket(x, floris))\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Unfriendly(x))\nforall x (Bucket(x, floris) -> Bucket(x, vallie))\n\nDeject(leoline, berrie)\n\nDeject(leoline, berrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The tamarra unpick the wain. The wain is meiotic. The wain is unwearable. The wain is projected. The wain does not need the tamarra. The wain resettle the naomi. The gilli is civic. The gilli is projected. The gilli is impressive. The gilli unpick the tamarra. The gilli unpick the naomi. The gilli constrict the tamarra. The gilli constrict the wain. The gilli resettle the tamarra. The naomi is impressive. The naomi does not need the gilli. If something is meiotic and unwearable then it resettle the gilli. Green things are unwearable. If something resettle the gilli then it resettle the tamarra. The tamarra is not projected.", "logic": "\nUnpick(tamarra, wain)\nMeiotic(wain)\nUnwearable(wain)\nProjected(wain)\nnot Constrict(wain, tamarra)\nResettle(wain, naomi)\nCivic(gilli)\nProjected(gilli)\nImpressive(gilli)\nUnpick(gilli, tamarra)\nUnpick(gilli, naomi)\nConstrict(gilli, tamarra)\nConstrict(gilli, wain)\nResettle(gilli, tamarra)\nImpressive(naomi)\nnot Constrict(naomi, gilli)\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Unwearable(x) -> Resettle(x, gilli))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) -> Unwearable(x))\nforall x (Resettle(x, gilli) -> Resettle(x, tamarra))\n\nnot Projected(tamarra)\n\nnot Projected(tamarra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The scarlet emasculate the aeriela. The aeriela is renowned. The aeriela is dilettante. The aeriela is charcoal. The aeriela does not need the scarlet. The aeriela disrespect the orelle. The bishop is bracteal. The bishop is charcoal. The bishop is ossified. The bishop emasculate the scarlet. The bishop emasculate the orelle. The bishop maneuver the scarlet. The bishop maneuver the aeriela. The bishop disrespect the scarlet. The orelle is ossified. The orelle does not need the bishop. If something is renowned and dilettante then it disrespect the bishop. Green things are dilettante. If something disrespect the bishop then it disrespect the scarlet. The orelle maneuver the orelle.", "logic": "\nEmasculate(scarlet, aeriela)\nRenowned(aeriela)\nDilettante(aeriela)\nCharcoal(aeriela)\nnot Maneuver(aeriela, scarlet)\nDisrespect(aeriela, orelle)\nBracteal(bishop)\nCharcoal(bishop)\nOssified(bishop)\nEmasculate(bishop, scarlet)\nEmasculate(bishop, orelle)\nManeuver(bishop, scarlet)\nManeuver(bishop, aeriela)\nDisrespect(bishop, scarlet)\nOssified(orelle)\nnot Maneuver(orelle, bishop)\nforall x (Renowned(x) and Dilettante(x) -> Disrespect(x, bishop))\nforall x (Renowned(x) -> Dilettante(x))\nforall x (Disrespect(x, bishop) -> Disrespect(x, scarlet))\n\nManeuver(orelle, orelle)\n\nManeuver(orelle, orelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The harlene kibbitz the jami. The harlene is fervent. The harlene epitomise the major. The major is cyclic. The jami epitomise the major. The jami epitomise the deborah. The deborah is cyclic. If someone is fervent then they chase the harlene. If someone kibbitz the harlene then the harlene is unreleased. The jami epitomise the deborah.", "logic": "\nKibbitz(harlene, jami)\nFervent(harlene)\nEpitomise(harlene, major)\nCyclic(major)\nEpitomise(jami, major)\nEpitomise(jami, deborah)\nCyclic(deborah)\nforall x (Fervent(x) -> Kibbitz(x, harlene))\nforall x (Kibbitz(x, harlene) -> Unreleased(harlene))\n\nEpitomise(jami, deborah)\n\ntherefore Epitomise(jami, deborah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The pearline dicker the vassili. The pearline is spinose. The pearline metricate the benetta. The benetta is sectorial. The vassili metricate the benetta. The vassili metricate the hanson. The hanson is sectorial. If someone is spinose then they chase the pearline. If someone dicker the pearline then the pearline is semitropic. The pearline is not spinose.", "logic": "\nDicker(pearline, vassili)\nSpinose(pearline)\nMetricate(pearline, benetta)\nSectorial(benetta)\nMetricate(vassili, benetta)\nMetricate(vassili, hanson)\nSectorial(hanson)\nforall x (Spinose(x) -> Dicker(x, pearline))\nforall x (Dicker(x, pearline) -> Semitropic(pearline))\n\nnot Spinose(pearline)\n\ntherefore Spinose(pearline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The cybel emaciate the calli. The cybel is polyvalent. The cybel skirl the blancha. The blancha is abasic. The calli skirl the blancha. The calli skirl the odelle. The odelle is abasic. If someone is polyvalent then they chase the cybel. If someone emaciate the cybel then the cybel is popliteal. The cybel emaciate the cybel.", "logic": "\nEmaciate(cybel, calli)\nPolyvalent(cybel)\nSkirl(cybel, blancha)\nAbasic(blancha)\nSkirl(calli, blancha)\nSkirl(calli, odelle)\nAbasic(odelle)\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Emaciate(x, cybel))\nforall x (Emaciate(x, cybel) -> Popliteal(cybel))\n\nEmaciate(cybel, cybel)\n\nPolyvalent(cybel) and forall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Emaciate(x, cybel)) -> therefore Emaciate(cybel, cybel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The marcela introvert the madelle. The marcela is unbranched. The marcela woolgather the isidore. The isidore is mazy. The madelle woolgather the isidore. The madelle woolgather the hadley. The hadley is mazy. If someone is unbranched then they chase the marcela. If someone introvert the marcela then the marcela is bivalved. The marcela does not chase the marcela.", "logic": "\nIntrovert(marcela, madelle)\nUnbranched(marcela)\nWoolgather(marcela, isidore)\nMazy(isidore)\nWoolgather(madelle, isidore)\nWoolgather(madelle, hadley)\nMazy(hadley)\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Introvert(x, marcela))\nforall x (Introvert(x, marcela) -> Bivalved(marcela))\n\nnot Introvert(marcela, marcela)\n\nUnbranched(marcela) and forall x (Unbranched(x) -> Introvert(x, marcela)) -> therefore Introvert(marcela, marcela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The lester emcee the wallas. The lester is perceptual. The lester imperil the tiff. The tiff is thornless. The wallas imperil the tiff. The wallas imperil the cecelia. The cecelia is thornless. If someone is perceptual then they chase the lester. If someone emcee the lester then the lester is tabu. The lester is tabu.", "logic": "\nEmcee(lester, wallas)\nPerceptual(lester)\nImperil(lester, tiff)\nThornless(tiff)\nImperil(wallas, tiff)\nImperil(wallas, cecelia)\nThornless(cecelia)\nforall x (Perceptual(x) -> Emcee(x, lester))\nforall x (Emcee(x, lester) -> Tabu(lester))\n\nTabu(lester)\n\nPerceptual(lester) and forall x (Perceptual(x) -> Emcee(x, lester)) -> therefore Emcee(lester, lester) Emcee(lester, lester) and forall x (Emcee(x, lester) -> Tabu(lester)) -> therefore Tabu(lester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The lazare retread the blanca. The lazare is lengthened. The lazare carve the anette. The anette is calorific. The blanca carve the anette. The blanca carve the shanon. The shanon is calorific. If someone is lengthened then they chase the lazare. If someone retread the lazare then the lazare is sideways. The lazare is not sideways.", "logic": "\nRetread(lazare, blanca)\nLengthened(lazare)\nCarve(lazare, anette)\nCalorific(anette)\nCarve(blanca, anette)\nCarve(blanca, shanon)\nCalorific(shanon)\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Retread(x, lazare))\nforall x (Retread(x, lazare) -> Sideways(lazare))\n\nnot Sideways(lazare)\n\nLengthened(lazare) and forall x (Lengthened(x) -> Retread(x, lazare)) -> therefore Retread(lazare, lazare) Retread(lazare, lazare) and forall x (Retread(x, lazare) -> Sideways(lazare)) -> therefore Sideways(lazare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The yetty misread the zea. The yetty is spacious. The yetty maledict the joselyn. The joselyn is axiomatic. The zea maledict the joselyn. The zea maledict the lawton. The lawton is axiomatic. If someone is spacious then they chase the yetty. If someone misread the yetty then the yetty is costless. The lawton does not chase the yetty.", "logic": "\nMisread(yetty, zea)\nSpacious(yetty)\nMaledict(yetty, joselyn)\nAxiomatic(joselyn)\nMaledict(zea, joselyn)\nMaledict(zea, lawton)\nAxiomatic(lawton)\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> Misread(x, yetty))\nforall x (Misread(x, yetty) -> Costless(yetty))\n\nnot Misread(lawton, yetty)\n\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> Misread(x, yetty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The immanuel flout the shirlee. The immanuel is lacy. The immanuel brail the corie. The corie is worrying. The shirlee brail the corie. The shirlee brail the maia. The maia is worrying. If someone is lacy then they chase the immanuel. If someone flout the immanuel then the immanuel is daunting. The corie flout the immanuel.", "logic": "\nFlout(immanuel, shirlee)\nLacy(immanuel)\nBrail(immanuel, corie)\nWorrying(corie)\nBrail(shirlee, corie)\nBrail(shirlee, maia)\nWorrying(maia)\nforall x (Lacy(x) -> Flout(x, immanuel))\nforall x (Flout(x, immanuel) -> Daunting(immanuel))\n\nFlout(corie, immanuel)\n\nforall x (Lacy(x) -> Flout(x, immanuel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The wat scuffle the pincus. The wat is polydactyl. The wat reconquer the christy. The christy is unflurried. The pincus reconquer the christy. The pincus reconquer the joete. The joete is unflurried. If someone is polydactyl then they chase the wat. If someone scuffle the wat then the wat is seamanly. The pincus does not chase the wat.", "logic": "\nScuffle(wat, pincus)\nPolydactyl(wat)\nReconquer(wat, christy)\nUnflurried(christy)\nReconquer(pincus, christy)\nReconquer(pincus, joete)\nUnflurried(joete)\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Scuffle(x, wat))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, wat) -> Seamanly(wat))\n\nnot Scuffle(pincus, wat)\n\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Scuffle(x, wat)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The harold disobey the wildon. The harold is yummy. The harold finedraw the wolfy. The wolfy is analogical. The wildon finedraw the wolfy. The wildon finedraw the suzie. The suzie is analogical. If someone is yummy then they chase the harold. If someone disobey the harold then the harold is uppish. The suzie disobey the suzie.", "logic": "\nDisobey(harold, wildon)\nYummy(harold)\nFinedraw(harold, wolfy)\nAnalogical(wolfy)\nFinedraw(wildon, wolfy)\nFinedraw(wildon, suzie)\nAnalogical(suzie)\nforall x (Yummy(x) -> Disobey(x, harold))\nforall x (Disobey(x, harold) -> Uppish(harold))\n\nDisobey(suzie, suzie)\n\nDisobey(suzie, suzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The eduardo spare the seline. The eduardo is nodulated. The eduardo referee the joni. The joni is convenient. The seline referee the joni. The seline referee the jef. The jef is convenient. If someone is nodulated then they chase the eduardo. If someone spare the eduardo then the eduardo is dastard. The jef does not see the eduardo.", "logic": "\nSpare(eduardo, seline)\nNodulated(eduardo)\nReferee(eduardo, joni)\nConvenient(joni)\nReferee(seline, joni)\nReferee(seline, jef)\nConvenient(jef)\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Spare(x, eduardo))\nforall x (Spare(x, eduardo) -> Dastard(eduardo))\n\nnot Referee(jef, eduardo)\n\nnot Referee(jef, eduardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The sumner spam the marrissa. The sumner is outrageous. The sumner calm the karia. The karia is surd. The marrissa calm the karia. The marrissa calm the gertrud. The gertrud is surd. If someone is outrageous then they chase the sumner. If someone spam the sumner then the sumner is senatorial. The karia calm the gertrud.", "logic": "\nSpam(sumner, marrissa)\nOutrageous(sumner)\nCalm(sumner, karia)\nSurd(karia)\nCalm(marrissa, karia)\nCalm(marrissa, gertrud)\nSurd(gertrud)\nforall x (Outrageous(x) -> Spam(x, sumner))\nforall x (Spam(x, sumner) -> Senatorial(sumner))\n\nCalm(karia, gertrud)\n\nCalm(karia, gertrud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1890"} {"premises": "The roxie is sore. The margurite ambuscade the roxie. If the roxie is divisional then the roxie does not chase the margurite. If something endow the roxie then it is sore. If something galumph the roxie and the roxie galumph the margurite then the roxie is not systolic. If the margurite ambuscade the roxie then the margurite endow the roxie. If something galumph the margurite and the margurite ambuscade the roxie then the roxie is sore. If something is sore and it does not chase the margurite then the margurite is not divisional. The margurite ambuscade the roxie.", "logic": "\nSore(roxie)\nAmbuscade(margurite, roxie)\nDivisional(roxie) -> not Endow(roxie, margurite)\nforall x (Endow(x, roxie) -> Sore(x))\nforall x (Galumph(x, roxie) and Galumph(roxie, margurite) -> not Systolic(roxie))\nAmbuscade(margurite, roxie) -> Endow(margurite, roxie)\nforall x (Galumph(x, margurite) and Ambuscade(margurite, roxie) -> Sore(roxie))\nforall x (Sore(x) and not Endow(x, margurite) -> not Divisional(margurite))\n\nAmbuscade(margurite, roxie)\n\ntherefore Ambuscade(margurite, roxie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The darya is awful. The jefferson bunco the darya. If the darya is zairean then the darya does not chase the jefferson. If something innovate the darya then it is awful. If something catabolize the darya and the darya catabolize the jefferson then the darya is not semidark. If the jefferson bunco the darya then the jefferson innovate the darya. If something catabolize the jefferson and the jefferson bunco the darya then the darya is awful. If something is awful and it does not chase the jefferson then the jefferson is not zairean. The darya is not awful.", "logic": "\nAwful(darya)\nBunco(jefferson, darya)\nZairean(darya) -> not Innovate(darya, jefferson)\nforall x (Innovate(x, darya) -> Awful(x))\nforall x (Catabolize(x, darya) and Catabolize(darya, jefferson) -> not Semidark(darya))\nBunco(jefferson, darya) -> Innovate(jefferson, darya)\nforall x (Catabolize(x, jefferson) and Bunco(jefferson, darya) -> Awful(darya))\nforall x (Awful(x) and not Innovate(x, jefferson) -> not Zairean(jefferson))\n\nnot Awful(darya)\n\ntherefore Awful(darya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The bay is recognised. The tawsha enact the bay. If the bay is slavonic then the bay does not chase the tawsha. If something proscribe the bay then it is recognised. If something misprint the bay and the bay misprint the tawsha then the bay is not ordained. If the tawsha enact the bay then the tawsha proscribe the bay. If something misprint the tawsha and the tawsha enact the bay then the bay is recognised. If something is recognised and it does not chase the tawsha then the tawsha is not slavonic. The tawsha proscribe the bay.", "logic": "\nRecognised(bay)\nEnact(tawsha, bay)\nSlavonic(bay) -> not Proscribe(bay, tawsha)\nforall x (Proscribe(x, bay) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Misprint(x, bay) and Misprint(bay, tawsha) -> not Ordained(bay))\nEnact(tawsha, bay) -> Proscribe(tawsha, bay)\nforall x (Misprint(x, tawsha) and Enact(tawsha, bay) -> Recognised(bay))\nforall x (Recognised(x) and not Proscribe(x, tawsha) -> not Slavonic(tawsha))\n\nProscribe(tawsha, bay)\n\nEnact(tawsha, bay) and Enact(tawsha, bay) -> Proscribe(tawsha, bay) -> therefore Proscribe(tawsha, bay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The zara is nonchalant. The trista contrast the zara. If the zara is poky then the zara does not chase the trista. If something reorient the zara then it is nonchalant. If something scent the zara and the zara scent the trista then the zara is not sardonic. If the trista contrast the zara then the trista reorient the zara. If something scent the trista and the trista contrast the zara then the zara is nonchalant. If something is nonchalant and it does not chase the trista then the trista is not poky. The trista does not chase the zara.", "logic": "\nNonchalant(zara)\nContrast(trista, zara)\nPoky(zara) -> not Reorient(zara, trista)\nforall x (Reorient(x, zara) -> Nonchalant(x))\nforall x (Scent(x, zara) and Scent(zara, trista) -> not Sardonic(zara))\nContrast(trista, zara) -> Reorient(trista, zara)\nforall x (Scent(x, trista) and Contrast(trista, zara) -> Nonchalant(zara))\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) and not Reorient(x, trista) -> not Poky(trista))\n\nnot Reorient(trista, zara)\n\nContrast(trista, zara) and Contrast(trista, zara) -> Reorient(trista, zara) -> therefore Reorient(trista, zara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The glenine is clausal. The lara affiliate the glenine. If the glenine is woebegone then the glenine does not chase the lara. If something diffuse the glenine then it is clausal. If something dishevel the glenine and the glenine dishevel the lara then the glenine is not wired. If the lara affiliate the glenine then the lara diffuse the glenine. If something dishevel the lara and the lara affiliate the glenine then the glenine is clausal. If something is clausal and it does not chase the lara then the lara is not woebegone. The lara is clausal.", "logic": "\nClausal(glenine)\nAffiliate(lara, glenine)\nWoebegone(glenine) -> not Diffuse(glenine, lara)\nforall x (Diffuse(x, glenine) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Dishevel(x, glenine) and Dishevel(glenine, lara) -> not Wired(glenine))\nAffiliate(lara, glenine) -> Diffuse(lara, glenine)\nforall x (Dishevel(x, lara) and Affiliate(lara, glenine) -> Clausal(glenine))\nforall x (Clausal(x) and not Diffuse(x, lara) -> not Woebegone(lara))\n\nClausal(lara)\n\nAffiliate(lara, glenine) and Affiliate(lara, glenine) -> Diffuse(lara, glenine) -> therefore Diffuse(lara, glenine) Diffuse(lara, glenine) and forall x (Diffuse(x, glenine) -> Clausal(x)) -> therefore Clausal(lara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The brandais is cubiform. The duffie optimise the brandais. If the brandais is puffy then the brandais does not chase the duffie. If something revitalize the brandais then it is cubiform. If something orient the brandais and the brandais orient the duffie then the brandais is not racking. If the duffie optimise the brandais then the duffie revitalize the brandais. If something orient the duffie and the duffie optimise the brandais then the brandais is cubiform. If something is cubiform and it does not chase the duffie then the duffie is not puffy. The duffie is not cubiform.", "logic": "\nCubiform(brandais)\nOptimise(duffie, brandais)\nPuffy(brandais) -> not Revitalize(brandais, duffie)\nforall x (Revitalize(x, brandais) -> Cubiform(x))\nforall x (Orient(x, brandais) and Orient(brandais, duffie) -> not Racking(brandais))\nOptimise(duffie, brandais) -> Revitalize(duffie, brandais)\nforall x (Orient(x, duffie) and Optimise(duffie, brandais) -> Cubiform(brandais))\nforall x (Cubiform(x) and not Revitalize(x, duffie) -> not Puffy(duffie))\n\nnot Cubiform(duffie)\n\nOptimise(duffie, brandais) and Optimise(duffie, brandais) -> Revitalize(duffie, brandais) -> therefore Revitalize(duffie, brandais) Revitalize(duffie, brandais) and forall x (Revitalize(x, brandais) -> Cubiform(x)) -> therefore Cubiform(duffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The toddie is united. The beitris militate the toddie. If the toddie is enkindled then the toddie does not chase the beitris. If something remodel the toddie then it is united. If something dismount the toddie and the toddie dismount the beitris then the toddie is not flighty. If the beitris militate the toddie then the beitris remodel the toddie. If something dismount the beitris and the beitris militate the toddie then the toddie is united. If something is united and it does not chase the beitris then the beitris is not enkindled. The toddie does not see the beitris.", "logic": "\nUnited(toddie)\nMilitate(beitris, toddie)\nEnkindled(toddie) -> not Remodel(toddie, beitris)\nforall x (Remodel(x, toddie) -> United(x))\nforall x (Dismount(x, toddie) and Dismount(toddie, beitris) -> not Flighty(toddie))\nMilitate(beitris, toddie) -> Remodel(beitris, toddie)\nforall x (Dismount(x, beitris) and Militate(beitris, toddie) -> United(toddie))\nforall x (United(x) and not Remodel(x, beitris) -> not Enkindled(beitris))\n\nnot Dismount(toddie, beitris)\n\nnot Dismount(toddie, beitris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The hortense is starchless. The allen winkle the hortense. If the hortense is plundering then the hortense does not chase the allen. If something billet the hortense then it is starchless. If something emcee the hortense and the hortense emcee the allen then the hortense is not polyatomic. If the allen winkle the hortense then the allen billet the hortense. If something emcee the allen and the allen winkle the hortense then the hortense is starchless. If something is starchless and it does not chase the allen then the allen is not plundering. The hortense winkle the allen.", "logic": "\nStarchless(hortense)\nWinkle(allen, hortense)\nPlundering(hortense) -> not Billet(hortense, allen)\nforall x (Billet(x, hortense) -> Starchless(x))\nforall x (Emcee(x, hortense) and Emcee(hortense, allen) -> not Polyatomic(hortense))\nWinkle(allen, hortense) -> Billet(allen, hortense)\nforall x (Emcee(x, allen) and Winkle(allen, hortense) -> Starchless(hortense))\nforall x (Starchless(x) and not Billet(x, allen) -> not Plundering(allen))\n\nWinkle(hortense, allen)\n\nWinkle(hortense, allen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The lisette is intertidal. The skyler bend the lisette. If the lisette is lacrimal then the lisette does not chase the skyler. If something argufy the lisette then it is intertidal. If something streetwalk the lisette and the lisette streetwalk the skyler then the lisette is not heatless. If the skyler bend the lisette then the skyler argufy the lisette. If something streetwalk the skyler and the skyler bend the lisette then the lisette is intertidal. If something is intertidal and it does not chase the skyler then the skyler is not lacrimal. The lisette does not visit the lisette.", "logic": "\nIntertidal(lisette)\nBend(skyler, lisette)\nLacrimal(lisette) -> not Argufy(lisette, skyler)\nforall x (Argufy(x, lisette) -> Intertidal(x))\nforall x (Streetwalk(x, lisette) and Streetwalk(lisette, skyler) -> not Heatless(lisette))\nBend(skyler, lisette) -> Argufy(skyler, lisette)\nforall x (Streetwalk(x, skyler) and Bend(skyler, lisette) -> Intertidal(lisette))\nforall x (Intertidal(x) and not Argufy(x, skyler) -> not Lacrimal(skyler))\n\nnot Bend(lisette, lisette)\n\nnot Bend(lisette, lisette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The pansie is dizzy. The lia devein the pansie. If the pansie is impetuous then the pansie does not chase the lia. If something shoe the pansie then it is dizzy. If something burp the pansie and the pansie burp the lia then the pansie is not tasteless. If the lia devein the pansie then the lia shoe the pansie. If something burp the lia and the lia devein the pansie then the pansie is dizzy. If something is dizzy and it does not chase the lia then the lia is not impetuous. The pansie is tasteless.", "logic": "\nDizzy(pansie)\nDevein(lia, pansie)\nImpetuous(pansie) -> not Shoe(pansie, lia)\nforall x (Shoe(x, pansie) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Burp(x, pansie) and Burp(pansie, lia) -> not Tasteless(pansie))\nDevein(lia, pansie) -> Shoe(lia, pansie)\nforall x (Burp(x, lia) and Devein(lia, pansie) -> Dizzy(pansie))\nforall x (Dizzy(x) and not Shoe(x, lia) -> not Impetuous(lia))\n\nTasteless(pansie)\n\nTasteless(pansie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The joana is repulsive. The tobias diversify the joana. If the joana is quotable then the joana does not chase the tobias. If something banter the joana then it is repulsive. If something julienne the joana and the joana julienne the tobias then the joana is not alienable. If the tobias diversify the joana then the tobias banter the joana. If something julienne the tobias and the tobias diversify the joana then the joana is repulsive. If something is repulsive and it does not chase the tobias then the tobias is not quotable. The tobias is not alienable.", "logic": "\nRepulsive(joana)\nDiversify(tobias, joana)\nQuotable(joana) -> not Banter(joana, tobias)\nforall x (Banter(x, joana) -> Repulsive(x))\nforall x (Julienne(x, joana) and Julienne(joana, tobias) -> not Alienable(joana))\nDiversify(tobias, joana) -> Banter(tobias, joana)\nforall x (Julienne(x, tobias) and Diversify(tobias, joana) -> Repulsive(joana))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) and not Banter(x, tobias) -> not Quotable(tobias))\n\nnot Alienable(tobias)\n\nnot Alienable(tobias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The kynthia is recreant. The jervis hybridise the kynthia. If the kynthia is veteran then the kynthia does not chase the jervis. If something plicate the kynthia then it is recreant. If something calve the kynthia and the kynthia calve the jervis then the kynthia is not chechen. If the jervis hybridise the kynthia then the jervis plicate the kynthia. If something calve the jervis and the jervis hybridise the kynthia then the kynthia is recreant. If something is recreant and it does not chase the jervis then the jervis is not veteran. The kynthia plicate the kynthia.", "logic": "\nRecreant(kynthia)\nHybridise(jervis, kynthia)\nVeteran(kynthia) -> not Plicate(kynthia, jervis)\nforall x (Plicate(x, kynthia) -> Recreant(x))\nforall x (Calve(x, kynthia) and Calve(kynthia, jervis) -> not Chechen(kynthia))\nHybridise(jervis, kynthia) -> Plicate(jervis, kynthia)\nforall x (Calve(x, jervis) and Hybridise(jervis, kynthia) -> Recreant(kynthia))\nforall x (Recreant(x) and not Plicate(x, jervis) -> not Veteran(jervis))\n\nPlicate(kynthia, kynthia)\n\nPlicate(kynthia, kynthia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The tannie hectograph the andrus. The andrus is vestibular. The andrus diminish the tannie. If someone diminish the tannie then the tannie compare the andrus. If someone compare the andrus then they visit the tannie. The tannie hectograph the andrus.", "logic": "\nHectograph(tannie, andrus)\nVestibular(andrus)\nDiminish(andrus, tannie)\nforall x (Diminish(x, tannie) -> Compare(tannie, andrus))\nforall x (Compare(x, andrus) -> Diminish(x, tannie))\n\nHectograph(tannie, andrus)\n\ntherefore Hectograph(tannie, andrus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The vanya rough the steffie. The steffie is fascinated. The steffie famish the vanya. If someone famish the vanya then the vanya alleviate the steffie. If someone alleviate the steffie then they visit the vanya. The steffie does not visit the vanya.", "logic": "\nRough(vanya, steffie)\nFascinated(steffie)\nFamish(steffie, vanya)\nforall x (Famish(x, vanya) -> Alleviate(vanya, steffie))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, steffie) -> Famish(x, vanya))\n\nnot Famish(steffie, vanya)\n\ntherefore Famish(steffie, vanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The burgess glance the moishe. The moishe is grassy. The moishe filigree the burgess. If someone filigree the burgess then the burgess absent the moishe. If someone absent the moishe then they visit the burgess. The burgess absent the moishe.", "logic": "\nGlance(burgess, moishe)\nGrassy(moishe)\nFiligree(moishe, burgess)\nforall x (Filigree(x, burgess) -> Absent(burgess, moishe))\nforall x (Absent(x, moishe) -> Filigree(x, burgess))\n\nAbsent(burgess, moishe)\n\nFiligree(moishe, burgess) and forall x (Filigree(x, burgess) -> Absent(burgess, moishe)) -> therefore Absent(burgess, moishe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The donnajean silhouette the ned. The ned is unshoed. The ned percolate the donnajean. If someone percolate the donnajean then the donnajean direct the ned. If someone direct the ned then they visit the donnajean. The donnajean does not chase the ned.", "logic": "\nSilhouette(donnajean, ned)\nUnshoed(ned)\nPercolate(ned, donnajean)\nforall x (Percolate(x, donnajean) -> Direct(donnajean, ned))\nforall x (Direct(x, ned) -> Percolate(x, donnajean))\n\nnot Direct(donnajean, ned)\n\nPercolate(ned, donnajean) and forall x (Percolate(x, donnajean) -> Direct(donnajean, ned)) -> therefore Direct(donnajean, ned)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The irina character the nealy. The nealy is ropey. The nealy unburden the irina. If someone unburden the irina then the irina fancy the nealy. If someone fancy the nealy then they visit the irina. The irina unburden the irina.", "logic": "\nCharacter(irina, nealy)\nRopey(nealy)\nUnburden(nealy, irina)\nforall x (Unburden(x, irina) -> Fancy(irina, nealy))\nforall x (Fancy(x, nealy) -> Unburden(x, irina))\n\nUnburden(irina, irina)\n\nUnburden(nealy, irina) and forall x (Unburden(x, irina) -> Fancy(irina, nealy)) -> therefore Fancy(irina, nealy) Fancy(irina, nealy) and forall x (Fancy(x, nealy) -> Unburden(x, irina)) -> therefore Unburden(irina, irina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The giorgio astound the sharie. The sharie is slopped. The sharie trip the giorgio. If someone trip the giorgio then the giorgio specialize the sharie. If someone specialize the sharie then they visit the giorgio. The giorgio does not visit the giorgio.", "logic": "\nAstound(giorgio, sharie)\nSlopped(sharie)\nTrip(sharie, giorgio)\nforall x (Trip(x, giorgio) -> Specialize(giorgio, sharie))\nforall x (Specialize(x, sharie) -> Trip(x, giorgio))\n\nnot Trip(giorgio, giorgio)\n\nTrip(sharie, giorgio) and forall x (Trip(x, giorgio) -> Specialize(giorgio, sharie)) -> therefore Specialize(giorgio, sharie) Specialize(giorgio, sharie) and forall x (Specialize(x, sharie) -> Trip(x, giorgio)) -> therefore Trip(giorgio, giorgio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The meryl titillate the fletcher. The fletcher is topknotted. The fletcher backstitch the meryl. If someone backstitch the meryl then the meryl scandalize the fletcher. If someone scandalize the fletcher then they visit the meryl. The meryl is not rough.", "logic": "\nTitillate(meryl, fletcher)\nTopknotted(fletcher)\nBackstitch(fletcher, meryl)\nforall x (Backstitch(x, meryl) -> Scandalize(meryl, fletcher))\nforall x (Scandalize(x, fletcher) -> Backstitch(x, meryl))\n\nnot Rough(meryl)\n\nnot Rough(meryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The lorry colourize the hamilton. The hamilton is dolorous. The hamilton section the lorry. If someone section the lorry then the lorry mutter the hamilton. If someone mutter the hamilton then they visit the lorry. The lorry is cold.", "logic": "\nColourize(lorry, hamilton)\nDolorous(hamilton)\nSection(hamilton, lorry)\nforall x (Section(x, lorry) -> Mutter(lorry, hamilton))\nforall x (Mutter(x, hamilton) -> Section(x, lorry))\n\nCold(lorry)\n\nCold(lorry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The willey realise the edgar. The edgar is thundery. The edgar propose the willey. If someone propose the willey then the willey conn the edgar. If someone conn the edgar then they visit the willey. The edgar does not visit the edgar.", "logic": "\nRealise(willey, edgar)\nThundery(edgar)\nPropose(edgar, willey)\nforall x (Propose(x, willey) -> Conn(willey, edgar))\nforall x (Conn(x, edgar) -> Propose(x, willey))\n\nnot Propose(edgar, edgar)\n\nnot Propose(edgar, edgar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The ephraim banish the barnie. The barnie is bigeminal. The barnie close the ephraim. If someone close the ephraim then the ephraim interleave the barnie. If someone interleave the barnie then they visit the ephraim. The barnie is young.", "logic": "\nBanish(ephraim, barnie)\nBigeminal(barnie)\nClose(barnie, ephraim)\nforall x (Close(x, ephraim) -> Interleave(ephraim, barnie))\nforall x (Interleave(x, barnie) -> Close(x, ephraim))\n\nYoung(barnie)\n\nYoung(barnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The yolanda catnap the coleen. The coleen is uninjured. The coleen defog the yolanda. If someone defog the yolanda then the yolanda telegraph the coleen. If someone telegraph the coleen then they visit the yolanda. The yolanda is not young.", "logic": "\nCatnap(yolanda, coleen)\nUninjured(coleen)\nDefog(coleen, yolanda)\nforall x (Defog(x, yolanda) -> Telegraph(yolanda, coleen))\nforall x (Telegraph(x, coleen) -> Defog(x, yolanda))\n\nnot Young(yolanda)\n\nnot Young(yolanda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "The shirline alight the kym. The kym is matronly. The kym etherify the shirline. If someone etherify the shirline then the shirline traumatize the kym. If someone traumatize the kym then they visit the shirline. The kym is cold.", "logic": "\nAlight(shirline, kym)\nMatronly(kym)\nEtherify(kym, shirline)\nforall x (Etherify(x, shirline) -> Traumatize(shirline, kym))\nforall x (Traumatize(x, kym) -> Etherify(x, shirline))\n\nCold(kym)\n\nCold(kym) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-711"} {"premises": "Steffi is ready. Steffi is saline. Steffi is not allargando. All saline, implacable people are cubic. All ready people are implacable. All saline people are unswerving. Steffi is not allargando.", "logic": "\nReady(steffi)\nSaline(steffi)\nnot Allargando(steffi)\nforall x (Saline(x) and Implacable(x) -> Cubic(x))\nforall x (Ready(x) -> Implacable(x))\nforall x (Saline(x) -> Unswerving(x))\n\nnot Allargando(steffi)\n\ntherefore not Allargando(steffi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2016"} {"premises": "Shaun is bayesian. Shaun is anarchic. Shaun is not nominative. All anarchic, abaxial people are fenestral. All bayesian people are abaxial. All anarchic people are nepalese. Shaun is not bayesian.", "logic": "\nBayesian(shaun)\nAnarchic(shaun)\nnot Nominative(shaun)\nforall x (Anarchic(x) and Abaxial(x) -> Fenestral(x))\nforall x (Bayesian(x) -> Abaxial(x))\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Nepalese(x))\n\nnot Bayesian(shaun)\n\ntherefore Bayesian(shaun)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2016"} {"premises": "Devondra is munificent. Devondra is frostian. Devondra is not guinean. All frostian, dear people are ferned. All munificent people are dear. All frostian people are strung. Devondra is strung.", "logic": "\nMunificent(devondra)\nFrostian(devondra)\nnot Guinean(devondra)\nforall x (Frostian(x) and Dear(x) -> Ferned(x))\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Dear(x))\nforall x (Frostian(x) -> Strung(x))\n\nStrung(devondra)\n\nFrostian(devondra) and forall x (Frostian(x) -> Strung(x)) -> therefore Strung(devondra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2016"} {"premises": "Herta is runcinate. Herta is asymptotic. Herta is not vapourous. All asymptotic, bovid people are snaky. All runcinate people are bovid. All asymptotic people are prefab. Herta is not bovid.", "logic": "\nRuncinate(herta)\nAsymptotic(herta)\nnot Vapourous(herta)\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) and Bovid(x) -> Snaky(x))\nforall x (Runcinate(x) -> Bovid(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) -> Prefab(x))\n\nnot Bovid(herta)\n\nRuncinate(herta) and forall x (Runcinate(x) -> Bovid(x)) -> therefore Bovid(herta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2016"} {"premises": "Sander is praising. Sander is euphoric. Sander is not airless. All euphoric, surefooted people are recluse. All praising people are surefooted. All euphoric people are vocational. Sander is recluse.", "logic": "\nPraising(sander)\nEuphoric(sander)\nnot Airless(sander)\nforall x (Euphoric(x) and Surefooted(x) -> Recluse(x))\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Surefooted(x))\nforall x (Euphoric(x) -> Vocational(x))\n\nRecluse(sander)\n\nPraising(sander) and forall x (Praising(x) -> Surefooted(x)) -> therefore Surefooted(sander) Euphoric(sander) and Surefooted(sander) and forall x (Euphoric(x) and Surefooted(x) -> Recluse(x)) -> therefore Recluse(sander)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2016"} {"premises": "Sisely is debauched. Sisely is breeding. Sisely is not drinkable. All breeding, ateleiotic people are hypotonic. All debauched people are ateleiotic. All breeding people are demented. Sisely is not hypotonic.", "logic": "\nDebauched(sisely)\nBreeding(sisely)\nnot Drinkable(sisely)\nforall x (Breeding(x) and Ateleiotic(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Ateleiotic(x))\nforall x (Breeding(x) -> Demented(x))\n\nnot Hypotonic(sisely)\n\nDebauched(sisely) and forall x (Debauched(x) -> Ateleiotic(x)) -> therefore Ateleiotic(sisely) Breeding(sisely) and Ateleiotic(sisely) and forall x (Breeding(x) and Ateleiotic(x) -> Hypotonic(x)) -> therefore Hypotonic(sisely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2016"} {"premises": "Lucio is ergotropic. Livia is enervated. Livia is annexal. Doris is not streaked. Marcie is personable. Marcie is enervated. Marcie is annexal. Nice people are not streaked. If someone is enervated and annexal then they are conelike. All conelike people are bewitching. Lucio is ergotropic.", "logic": "\nErgotropic(lucio)\nEnervated(livia)\nAnnexal(livia)\nnot Streaked(doris)\nPersonable(marcie)\nEnervated(marcie)\nAnnexal(marcie)\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> not Streaked(x))\nforall x (Enervated(x) and Annexal(x) -> Conelike(x))\nforall x (Conelike(x) -> Bewitching(x))\n\nErgotropic(lucio)\n\ntherefore Ergotropic(lucio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Phoebe is uncensored. Ilene is rutted. Ilene is bacchantic. Marthe is not mohammedan. Brunella is mistaken. Brunella is rutted. Brunella is bacchantic. Nice people are not mohammedan. If someone is rutted and bacchantic then they are ducal. All ducal people are attrited. Marthe is mohammedan.", "logic": "\nUncensored(phoebe)\nRutted(ilene)\nBacchantic(ilene)\nnot Mohammedan(marthe)\nMistaken(brunella)\nRutted(brunella)\nBacchantic(brunella)\nforall x (Rutted(x) -> not Mohammedan(x))\nforall x (Rutted(x) and Bacchantic(x) -> Ducal(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) -> Attrited(x))\n\nMohammedan(marthe)\n\ntherefore not Mohammedan(marthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Sileas is handleless. Auria is painful. Auria is outraged. Krystyna is not broke. Lenette is unmixable. Lenette is painful. Lenette is outraged. Nice people are not broke. If someone is painful and outraged then they are musing. All musing people are prevenient. Auria is not broke.", "logic": "\nHandleless(sileas)\nPainful(auria)\nOutraged(auria)\nnot Broke(krystyna)\nUnmixable(lenette)\nPainful(lenette)\nOutraged(lenette)\nforall x (Painful(x) -> not Broke(x))\nforall x (Painful(x) and Outraged(x) -> Musing(x))\nforall x (Musing(x) -> Prevenient(x))\n\nnot Broke(auria)\n\nPainful(auria) and forall x (Painful(x) -> not Broke(x)) -> therefore not Broke(auria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Lissy is bullocky. Felicia is anabatic. Felicia is crocked. Rupert is not magnetic. Helene is bermudan. Helene is anabatic. Helene is crocked. Nice people are not magnetic. If someone is anabatic and crocked then they are concurrent. All concurrent people are apodeictic. Helene is not concurrent.", "logic": "\nBullocky(lissy)\nAnabatic(felicia)\nCrocked(felicia)\nnot Magnetic(rupert)\nBermudan(helene)\nAnabatic(helene)\nCrocked(helene)\nforall x (Anabatic(x) -> not Magnetic(x))\nforall x (Anabatic(x) and Crocked(x) -> Concurrent(x))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\n\nnot Concurrent(helene)\n\nAnabatic(helene) and Crocked(helene) and forall x (Anabatic(x) and Crocked(x) -> Concurrent(x)) -> therefore Concurrent(helene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Coleman is albescent. Nat is negligible. Nat is adient. Judie is not basinal. Adelina is prostrate. Adelina is negligible. Adelina is adient. Nice people are not basinal. If someone is negligible and adient then they are uncrowded. All uncrowded people are heralded. Adelina is heralded.", "logic": "\nAlbescent(coleman)\nNegligible(nat)\nAdient(nat)\nnot Basinal(judie)\nProstrate(adelina)\nNegligible(adelina)\nAdient(adelina)\nforall x (Negligible(x) -> not Basinal(x))\nforall x (Negligible(x) and Adient(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Heralded(x))\n\nHeralded(adelina)\n\nNegligible(adelina) and Adient(adelina) and forall x (Negligible(x) and Adient(x) -> Uncrowded(x)) -> therefore Uncrowded(adelina) Uncrowded(adelina) and forall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Heralded(x)) -> therefore Heralded(adelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Nelli is esoteric. Becka is repetitive. Becka is fattening. Joni is not lopsided. Ulysses is voluntary. Ulysses is repetitive. Ulysses is fattening. Nice people are not lopsided. If someone is repetitive and fattening then they are fusiform. All fusiform people are adroit. Becka is not adroit.", "logic": "\nEsoteric(nelli)\nRepetitive(becka)\nFattening(becka)\nnot Lopsided(joni)\nVoluntary(ulysses)\nRepetitive(ulysses)\nFattening(ulysses)\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> not Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Repetitive(x) and Fattening(x) -> Fusiform(x))\nforall x (Fusiform(x) -> Adroit(x))\n\nnot Adroit(becka)\n\nRepetitive(becka) and Fattening(becka) and forall x (Repetitive(x) and Fattening(x) -> Fusiform(x)) -> therefore Fusiform(becka) Fusiform(becka) and forall x (Fusiform(x) -> Adroit(x)) -> therefore Adroit(becka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Tillie is vaporized. Kelsi is perianal. Kelsi is alpha. Gabe is not autosomal. Alanah is joking. Alanah is perianal. Alanah is alpha. Nice people are not autosomal. If someone is perianal and alpha then they are brickle. All brickle people are zygomatic. Gabe is not brickle.", "logic": "\nVaporized(tillie)\nPerianal(kelsi)\nAlpha(kelsi)\nnot Autosomal(gabe)\nJoking(alanah)\nPerianal(alanah)\nAlpha(alanah)\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> not Autosomal(x))\nforall x (Perianal(x) and Alpha(x) -> Brickle(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) -> Zygomatic(x))\n\nnot Brickle(gabe)\n\nforall x (Perianal(x) and Alpha(x) -> Brickle(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Eleonora is notorious. Redford is couthy. Redford is nordic. Madlin is not landless. Marcy is unoriented. Marcy is couthy. Marcy is nordic. Nice people are not landless. If someone is couthy and nordic then they are stern. All stern people are omissible. Madlin is omissible.", "logic": "\nNotorious(eleonora)\nCouthy(redford)\nNordic(redford)\nnot Landless(madlin)\nUnoriented(marcy)\nCouthy(marcy)\nNordic(marcy)\nforall x (Couthy(x) -> not Landless(x))\nforall x (Couthy(x) and Nordic(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Omissible(x))\n\nOmissible(madlin)\n\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Omissible(x)) <- forall x (Couthy(x) and Nordic(x) -> Stern(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Ehud is rubbishy. Oran is sniffy. Oran is dual. Darwin is not isoclinal. Magdaia is fimbriate. Magdaia is sniffy. Magdaia is dual. Nice people are not isoclinal. If someone is sniffy and dual then they are chopped. All chopped people are disruptive. Ehud is not disruptive.", "logic": "\nRubbishy(ehud)\nSniffy(oran)\nDual(oran)\nnot Isoclinal(darwin)\nFimbriate(magdaia)\nSniffy(magdaia)\nDual(magdaia)\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> not Isoclinal(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) and Dual(x) -> Chopped(x))\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Disruptive(x))\n\nnot Disruptive(ehud)\n\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Disruptive(x)) <- forall x (Sniffy(x) and Dual(x) -> Chopped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Anatollo is outclassed. Goldia is arched. Goldia is sclerotic. Tootsie is not superfine. Sibley is fruity. Sibley is arched. Sibley is sclerotic. Nice people are not superfine. If someone is arched and sclerotic then they are suicidal. All suicidal people are recognized. Sibley is outclassed.", "logic": "\nOutclassed(anatollo)\nArched(goldia)\nSclerotic(goldia)\nnot Superfine(tootsie)\nFruity(sibley)\nArched(sibley)\nSclerotic(sibley)\nforall x (Arched(x) -> not Superfine(x))\nforall x (Arched(x) and Sclerotic(x) -> Suicidal(x))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) -> Recognized(x))\n\nOutclassed(sibley)\n\nOutclassed(sibley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Blondie is only. Gibb is totipotent. Gibb is dustlike. Stormi is not motionless. Adiana is heralded. Adiana is totipotent. Adiana is dustlike. Nice people are not motionless. If someone is totipotent and dustlike then they are salty. All salty people are derelict. Gibb is not only.", "logic": "\nOnly(blondie)\nTotipotent(gibb)\nDustlike(gibb)\nnot Motionless(stormi)\nHeralded(adiana)\nTotipotent(adiana)\nDustlike(adiana)\nforall x (Totipotent(x) -> not Motionless(x))\nforall x (Totipotent(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Salty(x))\nforall x (Salty(x) -> Derelict(x))\n\nnot Only(gibb)\n\nnot Only(gibb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Shanna is stemmed. Aubree is redeemed. Aubree is dissipated. Bjorne is not thalloid. Shel is numinous. Shel is redeemed. Shel is dissipated. Nice people are not thalloid. If someone is redeemed and dissipated then they are repayable. All repayable people are relentless. Aubree is numinous.", "logic": "\nStemmed(shanna)\nRedeemed(aubree)\nDissipated(aubree)\nnot Thalloid(bjorne)\nNuminous(shel)\nRedeemed(shel)\nDissipated(shel)\nforall x (Redeemed(x) -> not Thalloid(x))\nforall x (Redeemed(x) and Dissipated(x) -> Repayable(x))\nforall x (Repayable(x) -> Relentless(x))\n\nNuminous(aubree)\n\nNuminous(aubree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1619"} {"premises": "Celie is cashable. Lorain is insomniac. Lorain is grooved. Round things are orchestral. Round things are guarded. All grooved things are double. If something is grooved then it is agonal. Nice things are insomniac. If something is double and grooved then it is guarded. Lorain is insomniac.", "logic": "\nCashable(celie)\nInsomniac(lorain)\nGrooved(lorain)\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> Orchestral(x))\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> Guarded(x))\nforall x (Grooved(x) -> Double(x))\nforall x (Grooved(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Double(x) and Grooved(x) -> Guarded(x))\n\nInsomniac(lorain)\n\ntherefore Insomniac(lorain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Peg is costal. Marney is convenient. Marney is glittering. Round things are glomerular. Round things are collusive. All glittering things are admissive. If something is glittering then it is pictural. Nice things are convenient. If something is admissive and glittering then it is collusive. Marney is not convenient.", "logic": "\nCostal(peg)\nConvenient(marney)\nGlittering(marney)\nforall x (Costal(x) -> Glomerular(x))\nforall x (Costal(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> Pictural(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Convenient(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) and Glittering(x) -> Collusive(x))\n\nnot Convenient(marney)\n\ntherefore Convenient(marney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Otha is treeless. Eydie is evaporated. Eydie is damp. Round things are tactful. Round things are inbuilt. All damp things are completing. If something is damp then it is itchy. Nice things are evaporated. If something is completing and damp then it is inbuilt. Eydie is completing.", "logic": "\nTreeless(otha)\nEvaporated(eydie)\nDamp(eydie)\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Tactful(x))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\nforall x (Damp(x) -> Completing(x))\nforall x (Damp(x) -> Itchy(x))\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Completing(x) and Damp(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\n\nCompleting(eydie)\n\nDamp(eydie) and forall x (Damp(x) -> Completing(x)) -> therefore Completing(eydie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Aline is heterodyne. Zena is nonmetal. Zena is unkeyed. Round things are subsequent. Round things are ophthalmic. All unkeyed things are unmated. If something is unkeyed then it is changed. Nice things are nonmetal. If something is unmated and unkeyed then it is ophthalmic. Aline is not ophthalmic.", "logic": "\nHeterodyne(aline)\nNonmetal(zena)\nUnkeyed(zena)\nforall x (Heterodyne(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Heterodyne(x) -> Ophthalmic(x))\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) -> Unmated(x))\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) -> Changed(x))\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) -> Nonmetal(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Unkeyed(x) -> Ophthalmic(x))\n\nnot Ophthalmic(aline)\n\nHeterodyne(aline) and forall x (Heterodyne(x) -> Ophthalmic(x)) -> therefore Ophthalmic(aline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Perl is corruptive. Agnese is amok. Agnese is whatsoever. Round things are imprudent. Round things are cottony. All whatsoever things are faded. If something is whatsoever then it is neolithic. Nice things are amok. If something is faded and whatsoever then it is cottony. Agnese is cottony.", "logic": "\nCorruptive(perl)\nAmok(agnese)\nWhatsoever(agnese)\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Imprudent(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Cottony(x))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Faded(x))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Neolithic(x))\nforall x (Cottony(x) -> Amok(x))\nforall x (Faded(x) and Whatsoever(x) -> Cottony(x))\n\nCottony(agnese)\n\nWhatsoever(agnese) and forall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Faded(x)) -> therefore Faded(agnese) Faded(agnese) and Whatsoever(agnese) and forall x (Faded(x) and Whatsoever(x) -> Cottony(x)) -> therefore Cottony(agnese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Hollie is executed. Vinny is cumbersome. Vinny is odorous. Round things are cacogenic. Round things are specked. All odorous things are thespian. If something is odorous then it is very. Nice things are cumbersome. If something is thespian and odorous then it is specked. Hollie is not cumbersome.", "logic": "\nExecuted(hollie)\nCumbersome(vinny)\nOdorous(vinny)\nforall x (Executed(x) -> Cacogenic(x))\nforall x (Executed(x) -> Specked(x))\nforall x (Odorous(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (Odorous(x) -> Very(x))\nforall x (Specked(x) -> Cumbersome(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) and Odorous(x) -> Specked(x))\n\nnot Cumbersome(hollie)\n\nExecuted(hollie) and forall x (Executed(x) -> Specked(x)) -> therefore Specked(hollie) Specked(hollie) and forall x (Specked(x) -> Cumbersome(x)) -> therefore Cumbersome(hollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Binni is anguillan. Thomasine is crisp. Thomasine is searing. Round things are amnesic. Round things are nonfatal. All searing things are bonelike. If something is searing then it is oldish. Nice things are crisp. If something is bonelike and searing then it is nonfatal. Binni is not oldish.", "logic": "\nAnguillan(binni)\nCrisp(thomasine)\nSearing(thomasine)\nforall x (Anguillan(x) -> Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Anguillan(x) -> Nonfatal(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Bonelike(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Bonelike(x) and Searing(x) -> Nonfatal(x))\n\nnot Oldish(binni)\n\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Oldish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Neda is trihydroxy. Erminia is sulfuric. Erminia is priapic. Round things are grownup. Round things are oblate. All priapic things are gracious. If something is priapic then it is gingerly. Nice things are sulfuric. If something is gracious and priapic then it is oblate. Erminia is grownup.", "logic": "\nTrihydroxy(neda)\nSulfuric(erminia)\nPriapic(erminia)\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> Grownup(x))\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> Oblate(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) -> Gracious(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nforall x (Oblate(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\nforall x (Gracious(x) and Priapic(x) -> Oblate(x))\n\nGrownup(erminia)\n\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> Grownup(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Gino is pharisaic. Consuela is unclipped. Consuela is maniacal. Round things are untidy. Round things are genial. All maniacal things are uncoerced. If something is maniacal then it is pharyngeal. Nice things are unclipped. If something is uncoerced and maniacal then it is genial. Gino is not uncoerced.", "logic": "\nPharisaic(gino)\nUnclipped(consuela)\nManiacal(consuela)\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Untidy(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Genial(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) -> Unclipped(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) and Maniacal(x) -> Genial(x))\n\nnot Uncoerced(gino)\n\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Uncoerced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Yard is daily. Henrik is unfree. Henrik is pupal. Round things are nonsexual. Round things are unhindered. All pupal things are refractive. If something is pupal then it is acetose. Nice things are unfree. If something is refractive and pupal then it is unhindered. Henrik is daily.", "logic": "\nDaily(yard)\nUnfree(henrik)\nPupal(henrik)\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Acetose(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Refractive(x) and Pupal(x) -> Unhindered(x))\n\nDaily(henrik)\n\nDaily(henrik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Elinore is incurious. Elinore is petty. Elinore is mass. Elinore is slouchy. Elinore is pseudo. Clive is incurious. Clive is crank. Clive is petty. Clive is mass. Barbara is incurious. Barbara is crank. Barbara is angulate. Barbara is petty. Barbara is mass. Barbara is slouchy. Barbara is pseudo. Smart, incurious people are pseudo. Nice, mass people are slouchy. All incurious people are angulate. Barbara is mass.", "logic": "\nIncurious(elinore)\nPetty(elinore)\nMass(elinore)\nSlouchy(elinore)\nPseudo(elinore)\nIncurious(clive)\nCrank(clive)\nPetty(clive)\nMass(clive)\nIncurious(barbara)\nCrank(barbara)\nAngulate(barbara)\nPetty(barbara)\nMass(barbara)\nSlouchy(barbara)\nPseudo(barbara)\nforall x (Slouchy(x) and Incurious(x) -> Pseudo(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) and Mass(x) -> Slouchy(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Angulate(x))\n\nMass(barbara)\n\ntherefore Mass(barbara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Joan is jingly. Joan is neckless. Joan is private. Joan is reanimated. Joan is inured. Claresta is jingly. Claresta is forehand. Claresta is neckless. Claresta is private. Inna is jingly. Inna is forehand. Inna is timbered. Inna is neckless. Inna is private. Inna is reanimated. Inna is inured. Smart, jingly people are inured. Nice, private people are reanimated. All jingly people are timbered. Joan is not inured.", "logic": "\nJingly(joan)\nNeckless(joan)\nPrivate(joan)\nReanimated(joan)\nInured(joan)\nJingly(claresta)\nForehand(claresta)\nNeckless(claresta)\nPrivate(claresta)\nJingly(inna)\nForehand(inna)\nTimbered(inna)\nNeckless(inna)\nPrivate(inna)\nReanimated(inna)\nInured(inna)\nforall x (Reanimated(x) and Jingly(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Forehand(x) and Private(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Jingly(x) -> Timbered(x))\n\nnot Inured(joan)\n\ntherefore Inured(joan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Essy is sonorous. Essy is despiteful. Essy is ropy. Essy is paraguayan. Essy is huge. Joslyn is sonorous. Joslyn is convex. Joslyn is despiteful. Joslyn is ropy. Wojciech is sonorous. Wojciech is convex. Wojciech is ovarian. Wojciech is despiteful. Wojciech is ropy. Wojciech is paraguayan. Wojciech is huge. Smart, sonorous people are huge. Nice, ropy people are paraguayan. All sonorous people are ovarian. Essy is ovarian.", "logic": "\nSonorous(essy)\nDespiteful(essy)\nRopy(essy)\nParaguayan(essy)\nHuge(essy)\nSonorous(joslyn)\nConvex(joslyn)\nDespiteful(joslyn)\nRopy(joslyn)\nSonorous(wojciech)\nConvex(wojciech)\nOvarian(wojciech)\nDespiteful(wojciech)\nRopy(wojciech)\nParaguayan(wojciech)\nHuge(wojciech)\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) and Sonorous(x) -> Huge(x))\nforall x (Convex(x) and Ropy(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Sonorous(x) -> Ovarian(x))\n\nOvarian(essy)\n\nSonorous(essy) and forall x (Sonorous(x) -> Ovarian(x)) -> therefore Ovarian(essy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Wash is jesuitical. Wash is banausic. Wash is dualistic. Wash is spacy. Wash is logistic. Adah is jesuitical. Adah is gingerly. Adah is banausic. Adah is dualistic. Aimil is jesuitical. Aimil is gingerly. Aimil is common. Aimil is banausic. Aimil is dualistic. Aimil is spacy. Aimil is logistic. Smart, jesuitical people are logistic. Nice, dualistic people are spacy. All jesuitical people are common. Wash is not common.", "logic": "\nJesuitical(wash)\nBanausic(wash)\nDualistic(wash)\nSpacy(wash)\nLogistic(wash)\nJesuitical(adah)\nGingerly(adah)\nBanausic(adah)\nDualistic(adah)\nJesuitical(aimil)\nGingerly(aimil)\nCommon(aimil)\nBanausic(aimil)\nDualistic(aimil)\nSpacy(aimil)\nLogistic(aimil)\nforall x (Spacy(x) and Jesuitical(x) -> Logistic(x))\nforall x (Gingerly(x) and Dualistic(x) -> Spacy(x))\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Common(x))\n\nnot Common(wash)\n\nJesuitical(wash) and forall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Common(x)) -> therefore Common(wash)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Tomkin is quotable. Tomkin is foliaged. Tomkin is frantic. Tomkin is marsupial. Tomkin is wasteful. Hilde is quotable. Hilde is deltoid. Hilde is foliaged. Hilde is frantic. Jane is quotable. Jane is deltoid. Jane is brimless. Jane is foliaged. Jane is frantic. Jane is marsupial. Jane is wasteful. Smart, quotable people are wasteful. Nice, frantic people are marsupial. All quotable people are brimless. Hilde is wasteful.", "logic": "\nQuotable(tomkin)\nFoliaged(tomkin)\nFrantic(tomkin)\nMarsupial(tomkin)\nWasteful(tomkin)\nQuotable(hilde)\nDeltoid(hilde)\nFoliaged(hilde)\nFrantic(hilde)\nQuotable(jane)\nDeltoid(jane)\nBrimless(jane)\nFoliaged(jane)\nFrantic(jane)\nMarsupial(jane)\nWasteful(jane)\nforall x (Marsupial(x) and Quotable(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) and Frantic(x) -> Marsupial(x))\nforall x (Quotable(x) -> Brimless(x))\n\nWasteful(hilde)\n\nDeltoid(hilde) and Frantic(hilde) and forall x (Deltoid(x) and Frantic(x) -> Marsupial(x)) -> therefore Marsupial(hilde) Marsupial(hilde) and Quotable(hilde) and forall x (Marsupial(x) and Quotable(x) -> Wasteful(x)) -> therefore Wasteful(hilde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Ava is sunny. Ava is ghanian. Ava is gallant. Ava is previous. Ava is surplus. Lissie is sunny. Lissie is revolting. Lissie is ghanian. Lissie is gallant. Sande is sunny. Sande is revolting. Sande is undrained. Sande is ghanian. Sande is gallant. Sande is previous. Sande is surplus. Smart, sunny people are surplus. Nice, gallant people are previous. All sunny people are undrained. Lissie is not surplus.", "logic": "\nSunny(ava)\nGhanian(ava)\nGallant(ava)\nPrevious(ava)\nSurplus(ava)\nSunny(lissie)\nRevolting(lissie)\nGhanian(lissie)\nGallant(lissie)\nSunny(sande)\nRevolting(sande)\nUndrained(sande)\nGhanian(sande)\nGallant(sande)\nPrevious(sande)\nSurplus(sande)\nforall x (Previous(x) and Sunny(x) -> Surplus(x))\nforall x (Revolting(x) and Gallant(x) -> Previous(x))\nforall x (Sunny(x) -> Undrained(x))\n\nnot Surplus(lissie)\n\nRevolting(lissie) and Gallant(lissie) and forall x (Revolting(x) and Gallant(x) -> Previous(x)) -> therefore Previous(lissie) Previous(lissie) and Sunny(lissie) and forall x (Previous(x) and Sunny(x) -> Surplus(x)) -> therefore Surplus(lissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Agustin is reluctant. Ange is pockmarked. If something is reluctant then it is trimotored. If Agustin is trimotored then Agustin is mouldy. If Ange is pockmarked then Ange is unnotched. Agustin is reluctant.", "logic": "\nReluctant(agustin)\nPockmarked(ange)\nforall x (Reluctant(x) -> Trimotored(x))\nTrimotored(agustin) -> Mouldy(agustin)\nPockmarked(ange) -> Unnotched(ange)\n\nReluctant(agustin)\n\ntherefore Reluctant(agustin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Natalee is slummy. Peta is quilted. If something is slummy then it is maroon. If Natalee is maroon then Natalee is warming. If Peta is quilted then Peta is unreported. Natalee is not slummy.", "logic": "\nSlummy(natalee)\nQuilted(peta)\nforall x (Slummy(x) -> Maroon(x))\nMaroon(natalee) -> Warming(natalee)\nQuilted(peta) -> Unreported(peta)\n\nnot Slummy(natalee)\n\ntherefore Slummy(natalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Bjorne is pigheaded. Hermia is ceylonese. If something is pigheaded then it is choric. If Bjorne is choric then Bjorne is diarrhetic. If Hermia is ceylonese then Hermia is aspectual. Bjorne is choric.", "logic": "\nPigheaded(bjorne)\nCeylonese(hermia)\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Choric(x))\nChoric(bjorne) -> Diarrhetic(bjorne)\nCeylonese(hermia) -> Aspectual(hermia)\n\nChoric(bjorne)\n\nPigheaded(bjorne) and forall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Choric(x)) -> therefore Choric(bjorne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Corette is expressive. Cyrille is fragrant. If something is expressive then it is unsought. If Corette is unsought then Corette is agential. If Cyrille is fragrant then Cyrille is colonnaded. Cyrille is not colonnaded.", "logic": "\nExpressive(corette)\nFragrant(cyrille)\nforall x (Expressive(x) -> Unsought(x))\nUnsought(corette) -> Agential(corette)\nFragrant(cyrille) -> Colonnaded(cyrille)\n\nnot Colonnaded(cyrille)\n\nFragrant(cyrille) and Fragrant(cyrille) -> Colonnaded(cyrille) -> therefore Colonnaded(cyrille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Cameron is confiding. Ardine is dermal. If something is confiding then it is verminous. If Cameron is verminous then Cameron is seraphical. If Ardine is dermal then Ardine is stuporous. Cameron is seraphical.", "logic": "\nConfiding(cameron)\nDermal(ardine)\nforall x (Confiding(x) -> Verminous(x))\nVerminous(cameron) -> Seraphical(cameron)\nDermal(ardine) -> Stuporous(ardine)\n\nSeraphical(cameron)\n\nConfiding(cameron) and forall x (Confiding(x) -> Verminous(x)) -> therefore Verminous(cameron) Verminous(cameron) and Verminous(cameron) -> Seraphical(cameron) -> therefore Seraphical(cameron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Orren is vincible. Karmen is sham. If something is vincible then it is acropetal. If Orren is acropetal then Orren is discalced. If Karmen is sham then Karmen is elevated. Orren is not discalced.", "logic": "\nVincible(orren)\nSham(karmen)\nforall x (Vincible(x) -> Acropetal(x))\nAcropetal(orren) -> Discalced(orren)\nSham(karmen) -> Elevated(karmen)\n\nnot Discalced(orren)\n\nVincible(orren) and forall x (Vincible(x) -> Acropetal(x)) -> therefore Acropetal(orren) Acropetal(orren) and Acropetal(orren) -> Discalced(orren) -> therefore Discalced(orren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Justina is tigerish. Briney is unequal. If something is tigerish then it is overland. If Justina is overland then Justina is aglitter. If Briney is unequal then Briney is bleached. Briney is not overland.", "logic": "\nTigerish(justina)\nUnequal(briney)\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Overland(x))\nOverland(justina) -> Aglitter(justina)\nUnequal(briney) -> Bleached(briney)\n\nnot Overland(briney)\n\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Overland(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Ardyth is screaky. Henrik is unknown. If something is screaky then it is stormproof. If Ardyth is stormproof then Ardyth is ingrown. If Henrik is unknown then Henrik is irreverent. Ardyth is unknown.", "logic": "\nScreaky(ardyth)\nUnknown(henrik)\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Stormproof(x))\nStormproof(ardyth) -> Ingrown(ardyth)\nUnknown(henrik) -> Irreverent(henrik)\n\nUnknown(ardyth)\n\nUnknown(ardyth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Sal is ordinal. Bellina is temporary. If something is ordinal then it is algid. If Sal is algid then Sal is expectant. If Bellina is temporary then Bellina is booming. Sal is not quiet.", "logic": "\nOrdinal(sal)\nTemporary(bellina)\nforall x (Ordinal(x) -> Algid(x))\nAlgid(sal) -> Expectant(sal)\nTemporary(bellina) -> Booming(bellina)\n\nnot Quiet(sal)\n\nnot Quiet(sal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Anthea is soured. Marianna is roan. If something is soured then it is windswept. If Anthea is windswept then Anthea is startled. If Marianna is roan then Marianna is sisyphean. Anthea is nice.", "logic": "\nSoured(anthea)\nRoan(marianna)\nforall x (Soured(x) -> Windswept(x))\nWindswept(anthea) -> Startled(anthea)\nRoan(marianna) -> Sisyphean(marianna)\n\nNice(anthea)\n\nNice(anthea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Prent is caducous. Ronna is hedonistic. If something is caducous then it is looted. If Prent is looted then Prent is extendable. If Ronna is hedonistic then Ronna is bicyclic. Prent is not bicyclic.", "logic": "\nCaducous(prent)\nHedonistic(ronna)\nforall x (Caducous(x) -> Looted(x))\nLooted(prent) -> Extendable(prent)\nHedonistic(ronna) -> Bicyclic(ronna)\n\nnot Bicyclic(prent)\n\nnot Bicyclic(prent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Harman is hyperopic. Bev is gainful. If something is hyperopic then it is undamaged. If Harman is undamaged then Harman is virtuoso. If Bev is gainful then Bev is ventricous. Bev is quiet.", "logic": "\nHyperopic(harman)\nGainful(bev)\nforall x (Hyperopic(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nUndamaged(harman) -> Virtuoso(harman)\nGainful(bev) -> Ventricous(bev)\n\nQuiet(bev)\n\nQuiet(bev) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-102"} {"premises": "Dannie is capitate. Dannie is acaudate. Dannie is synovial. Dannie is cacodylic. Dannie is legato. Dannie is vagal. Lusa is capitate. Lusa is unmedical. Lusa is synovial. Lusa is cacodylic. All synovial people are acaudate. All synovial, acaudate people are unmedical. All legato people are capitate. If someone is vagal then they are capitate. Cold people are vagal. Round people are acaudate. Dannie is acaudate.", "logic": "\nCapitate(dannie)\nAcaudate(dannie)\nSynovial(dannie)\nCacodylic(dannie)\nLegato(dannie)\nVagal(dannie)\nCapitate(lusa)\nUnmedical(lusa)\nSynovial(lusa)\nCacodylic(lusa)\nforall x (Synovial(x) -> Acaudate(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) and Acaudate(x) -> Unmedical(x))\nforall x (Legato(x) -> Capitate(x))\nforall x (Vagal(x) -> Capitate(x))\nforall x (Acaudate(x) -> Vagal(x))\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) -> Acaudate(x))\n\nAcaudate(dannie)\n\ntherefore Acaudate(dannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1671"} {"premises": "Rutledge is stubbly. Rutledge is neotenic. Rutledge is stoical. Rutledge is pagan. Rutledge is billowing. Rutledge is totalistic. Chevalier is stubbly. Chevalier is demagogic. Chevalier is stoical. Chevalier is pagan. All stoical people are neotenic. All stoical, neotenic people are demagogic. All billowing people are stubbly. If someone is totalistic then they are stubbly. Cold people are totalistic. Round people are neotenic. Rutledge is not billowing.", "logic": "\nStubbly(rutledge)\nNeotenic(rutledge)\nStoical(rutledge)\nPagan(rutledge)\nBillowing(rutledge)\nTotalistic(rutledge)\nStubbly(chevalier)\nDemagogic(chevalier)\nStoical(chevalier)\nPagan(chevalier)\nforall x (Stoical(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Stoical(x) and Neotenic(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Billowing(x) -> Stubbly(x))\nforall x (Totalistic(x) -> Stubbly(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Totalistic(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) -> Neotenic(x))\n\nnot Billowing(rutledge)\n\ntherefore Billowing(rutledge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1671"} {"premises": "Cesar is calcific. Cesar is bulbed. Cesar is parietal. Cesar is snarly. Cesar is ruandan. Cesar is several. Eleni is calcific. Eleni is weakening. Eleni is parietal. Eleni is snarly. All parietal people are bulbed. All parietal, bulbed people are weakening. All ruandan people are calcific. If someone is several then they are calcific. Cold people are several. Round people are bulbed. Cesar is weakening.", "logic": "\nCalcific(cesar)\nBulbed(cesar)\nParietal(cesar)\nSnarly(cesar)\nRuandan(cesar)\nSeveral(cesar)\nCalcific(eleni)\nWeakening(eleni)\nParietal(eleni)\nSnarly(eleni)\nforall x (Parietal(x) -> Bulbed(x))\nforall x (Parietal(x) and Bulbed(x) -> Weakening(x))\nforall x (Ruandan(x) -> Calcific(x))\nforall x (Several(x) -> Calcific(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) -> Several(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) -> Bulbed(x))\n\nWeakening(cesar)\n\nParietal(cesar) and Bulbed(cesar) and forall x (Parietal(x) and Bulbed(x) -> Weakening(x)) -> therefore Weakening(cesar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1671"} {"premises": "Humphrey is monstrous. Humphrey is aldermanic. Humphrey is expiatory. Humphrey is xlii. Humphrey is mortgaged. Humphrey is flagging. Galen is monstrous. Galen is revolved. Galen is expiatory. Galen is xlii. All expiatory people are aldermanic. All expiatory, aldermanic people are revolved. All mortgaged people are monstrous. If someone is flagging then they are monstrous. Cold people are flagging. Round people are aldermanic. Galen is not aldermanic.", "logic": "\nMonstrous(humphrey)\nAldermanic(humphrey)\nExpiatory(humphrey)\nXlii(humphrey)\nMortgaged(humphrey)\nFlagging(humphrey)\nMonstrous(galen)\nRevolved(galen)\nExpiatory(galen)\nXlii(galen)\nforall x (Expiatory(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and Aldermanic(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Monstrous(x))\nforall x (Flagging(x) -> Monstrous(x))\nforall x (Aldermanic(x) -> Flagging(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\n\nnot Aldermanic(galen)\n\nXlii(galen) and forall x (Xlii(x) -> Aldermanic(x)) -> therefore Aldermanic(galen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1671"} {"premises": "Laila is lidded. Laila is saudi. Laila is immunised. Laila is cypriot. Laila is shapely. Laila is patent. Briggs is lidded. Briggs is radical. Briggs is immunised. Briggs is cypriot. All immunised people are saudi. All immunised, saudi people are radical. All shapely people are lidded. If someone is patent then they are lidded. Cold people are patent. Round people are saudi. Briggs is patent.", "logic": "\nLidded(laila)\nSaudi(laila)\nImmunised(laila)\nCypriot(laila)\nShapely(laila)\nPatent(laila)\nLidded(briggs)\nRadical(briggs)\nImmunised(briggs)\nCypriot(briggs)\nforall x (Immunised(x) -> Saudi(x))\nforall x (Immunised(x) and Saudi(x) -> Radical(x))\nforall x (Shapely(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Saudi(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) -> Saudi(x))\n\nPatent(briggs)\n\nCypriot(briggs) and forall x (Cypriot(x) -> Saudi(x)) -> therefore Saudi(briggs) Saudi(briggs) and forall x (Saudi(x) -> Patent(x)) -> therefore Patent(briggs)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1671"} {"premises": "Odessa is obtuse. Odessa is cleft. Odessa is bilingual. Odessa is aliphatic. Odessa is raptorial. Odessa is diamantine. Rhetta is obtuse. Rhetta is unservile. Rhetta is bilingual. Rhetta is aliphatic. All bilingual people are cleft. All bilingual, cleft people are unservile. All raptorial people are obtuse. If someone is diamantine then they are obtuse. Cold people are diamantine. Round people are cleft. Rhetta is not diamantine.", "logic": "\nObtuse(odessa)\nCleft(odessa)\nBilingual(odessa)\nAliphatic(odessa)\nRaptorial(odessa)\nDiamantine(odessa)\nObtuse(rhetta)\nUnservile(rhetta)\nBilingual(rhetta)\nAliphatic(rhetta)\nforall x (Bilingual(x) -> Cleft(x))\nforall x (Bilingual(x) and Cleft(x) -> Unservile(x))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) -> Obtuse(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) -> Obtuse(x))\nforall x (Cleft(x) -> Diamantine(x))\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) -> Cleft(x))\n\nnot Diamantine(rhetta)\n\nAliphatic(rhetta) and forall x (Aliphatic(x) -> Cleft(x)) -> therefore Cleft(rhetta) Cleft(rhetta) and forall x (Cleft(x) -> Diamantine(x)) -> therefore Diamantine(rhetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1671"} {"premises": "Madelena is prepared. Waylon is bicornuous. Wendell is not answering. White people are snorty. Quiet people are answering. Waylon is bicornuous.", "logic": "\nPrepared(madelena)\nBicornuous(waylon)\nnot Answering(wendell)\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Snorty(x))\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Answering(x))\n\nBicornuous(waylon)\n\ntherefore Bicornuous(waylon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Dyanne is priestlike. Maison is hoydenish. Averil is not unsheathed. White people are unsafe. Quiet people are unsheathed. Averil is unsheathed.", "logic": "\nPriestlike(dyanne)\nHoydenish(maison)\nnot Unsheathed(averil)\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nforall x (Hoydenish(x) -> Unsheathed(x))\n\nUnsheathed(averil)\n\ntherefore not Unsheathed(averil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Dewey is farseeing. Darell is unbeaten. Sorcha is not soaring. White people are fibrillose. Quiet people are soaring. Darell is soaring.", "logic": "\nFarseeing(dewey)\nUnbeaten(darell)\nnot Soaring(sorcha)\nforall x (Soaring(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Unbeaten(x) -> Soaring(x))\n\nSoaring(darell)\n\nUnbeaten(darell) and forall x (Unbeaten(x) -> Soaring(x)) -> therefore Soaring(darell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Emerson is original. Ada is catalan. Stacy is not sidearm. White people are hairlike. Quiet people are sidearm. Ada is not sidearm.", "logic": "\nOriginal(emerson)\nCatalan(ada)\nnot Sidearm(stacy)\nforall x (Sidearm(x) -> Hairlike(x))\nforall x (Catalan(x) -> Sidearm(x))\n\nnot Sidearm(ada)\n\nCatalan(ada) and forall x (Catalan(x) -> Sidearm(x)) -> therefore Sidearm(ada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Karon is meningeal. Stephenie is romansh. Samuela is not indisposed. White people are alkahestic. Quiet people are indisposed. Stephenie is alkahestic.", "logic": "\nMeningeal(karon)\nRomansh(stephenie)\nnot Indisposed(samuela)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) -> Alkahestic(x))\nforall x (Romansh(x) -> Indisposed(x))\n\nAlkahestic(stephenie)\n\nRomansh(stephenie) and forall x (Romansh(x) -> Indisposed(x)) -> therefore Indisposed(stephenie) Indisposed(stephenie) and forall x (Indisposed(x) -> Alkahestic(x)) -> therefore Alkahestic(stephenie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Karna is unheeding. Marcio is berrylike. Franni is not unsubtle. White people are graceless. Quiet people are unsubtle. Marcio is not graceless.", "logic": "\nUnheeding(karna)\nBerrylike(marcio)\nnot Unsubtle(franni)\nforall x (Unsubtle(x) -> Graceless(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\n\nnot Graceless(marcio)\n\nBerrylike(marcio) and forall x (Berrylike(x) -> Unsubtle(x)) -> therefore Unsubtle(marcio) Unsubtle(marcio) and forall x (Unsubtle(x) -> Graceless(x)) -> therefore Graceless(marcio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Zach is glassless. Brock is xeric. Orly is not distinct. White people are neighborly. Quiet people are distinct. Zach is not neighborly.", "logic": "\nGlassless(zach)\nXeric(brock)\nnot Distinct(orly)\nforall x (Distinct(x) -> Neighborly(x))\nforall x (Xeric(x) -> Distinct(x))\n\nnot Neighborly(zach)\n\nforall x (Distinct(x) -> Neighborly(x)) <- forall x (Xeric(x) -> Distinct(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Adolph is certain. Adelina is closing. Sile is not coagulate. White people are cloggy. Quiet people are coagulate. Adolph is coagulate.", "logic": "\nCertain(adolph)\nClosing(adelina)\nnot Coagulate(sile)\nforall x (Coagulate(x) -> Cloggy(x))\nforall x (Closing(x) -> Coagulate(x))\n\nCoagulate(adolph)\n\nforall x (Closing(x) -> Coagulate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Ardelle is submersed. Ranee is classic. Irena is not nonskid. White people are lumbering. Quiet people are nonskid. Irena is not lumbering.", "logic": "\nSubmersed(ardelle)\nClassic(ranee)\nnot Nonskid(irena)\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Lumbering(x))\nforall x (Classic(x) -> Nonskid(x))\n\nnot Lumbering(irena)\n\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Lumbering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Rica is bowery. Griffith is pugnacious. Cosette is not deboned. White people are heretical. Quiet people are deboned. Griffith is bowery.", "logic": "\nBowery(rica)\nPugnacious(griffith)\nnot Deboned(cosette)\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) -> Deboned(x))\n\nBowery(griffith)\n\nBowery(griffith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Molli is anxious. Nicolle is proverbial. Teresina is not escaped. White people are longhand. Quiet people are escaped. Teresina is not round.", "logic": "\nAnxious(molli)\nProverbial(nicolle)\nnot Escaped(teresina)\nforall x (Escaped(x) -> Longhand(x))\nforall x (Proverbial(x) -> Escaped(x))\n\nnot Round(teresina)\n\nnot Round(teresina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "Cissie is sacrosanct. Otis is frisky. Herbert is not writhen. White people are humanlike. Quiet people are writhen. Cissie is big.", "logic": "\nSacrosanct(cissie)\nFrisky(otis)\nnot Writhen(herbert)\nforall x (Writhen(x) -> Humanlike(x))\nforall x (Frisky(x) -> Writhen(x))\n\nBig(cissie)\n\nBig(cissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2276"} {"premises": "The vince verse the rochelle. The vince is pictural. The vince is corrugated. The vince is appetising. The vince roil the rochelle. The vince cartoon the rochelle. The rochelle verse the vince. The rochelle is pictural. The rochelle is corrugated. The rochelle is diluted. The rochelle is placating. The rochelle cartoon the vince. If something cartoon the vince and it roil the vince then the vince is diluted. If something is appetising and it cartoon the rochelle then the rochelle roil the vince. If something is appetising then it roil the rochelle. The rochelle is corrugated.", "logic": "\nVerse(vince, rochelle)\nPictural(vince)\nCorrugated(vince)\nAppetising(vince)\nRoil(vince, rochelle)\nCartoon(vince, rochelle)\nVerse(rochelle, vince)\nPictural(rochelle)\nCorrugated(rochelle)\nDiluted(rochelle)\nPlacating(rochelle)\nCartoon(rochelle, vince)\nforall x (Cartoon(x, vince) and Roil(x, vince) -> Diluted(vince))\nforall x (Appetising(x) and Cartoon(x, rochelle) -> Roil(rochelle, vince))\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Roil(x, rochelle))\n\nCorrugated(rochelle)\n\ntherefore Corrugated(rochelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The benjamen cinematize the cynthia. The benjamen is vulpecular. The benjamen is stunning. The benjamen is brachiate. The benjamen help the cynthia. The benjamen moderate the cynthia. The cynthia cinematize the benjamen. The cynthia is vulpecular. The cynthia is stunning. The cynthia is cryonic. The cynthia is ruffled. The cynthia moderate the benjamen. If something moderate the benjamen and it help the benjamen then the benjamen is cryonic. If something is brachiate and it moderate the cynthia then the cynthia help the benjamen. If something is brachiate then it help the cynthia. The benjamen is not stunning.", "logic": "\nCinematize(benjamen, cynthia)\nVulpecular(benjamen)\nStunning(benjamen)\nBrachiate(benjamen)\nHelp(benjamen, cynthia)\nModerate(benjamen, cynthia)\nCinematize(cynthia, benjamen)\nVulpecular(cynthia)\nStunning(cynthia)\nCryonic(cynthia)\nRuffled(cynthia)\nModerate(cynthia, benjamen)\nforall x (Moderate(x, benjamen) and Help(x, benjamen) -> Cryonic(benjamen))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and Moderate(x, cynthia) -> Help(cynthia, benjamen))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) -> Help(x, cynthia))\n\nnot Stunning(benjamen)\n\ntherefore Stunning(benjamen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The titus slash the jen. The titus is emulous. The titus is unsmiling. The titus is scary. The titus defrost the jen. The titus browbeat the jen. The jen slash the titus. The jen is emulous. The jen is unsmiling. The jen is supine. The jen is seminal. The jen browbeat the titus. If something browbeat the titus and it defrost the titus then the titus is supine. If something is scary and it browbeat the jen then the jen defrost the titus. If something is scary then it defrost the jen. The jen defrost the titus.", "logic": "\nSlash(titus, jen)\nEmulous(titus)\nUnsmiling(titus)\nScary(titus)\nDefrost(titus, jen)\nBrowbeat(titus, jen)\nSlash(jen, titus)\nEmulous(jen)\nUnsmiling(jen)\nSupine(jen)\nSeminal(jen)\nBrowbeat(jen, titus)\nforall x (Browbeat(x, titus) and Defrost(x, titus) -> Supine(titus))\nforall x (Scary(x) and Browbeat(x, jen) -> Defrost(jen, titus))\nforall x (Scary(x) -> Defrost(x, jen))\n\nDefrost(jen, titus)\n\nScary(titus) and Browbeat(titus, jen) and forall x (Scary(x) and Browbeat(x, jen) -> Defrost(jen, titus)) -> therefore Defrost(jen, titus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The dominic dispread the gera. The dominic is plumb. The dominic is sickish. The dominic is corporeal. The dominic flash the gera. The dominic tempt the gera. The gera dispread the dominic. The gera is plumb. The gera is sickish. The gera is alvine. The gera is pending. The gera tempt the dominic. If something tempt the dominic and it flash the dominic then the dominic is alvine. If something is corporeal and it tempt the gera then the gera flash the dominic. If something is corporeal then it flash the gera. The gera does not need the dominic.", "logic": "\nDispread(dominic, gera)\nPlumb(dominic)\nSickish(dominic)\nCorporeal(dominic)\nFlash(dominic, gera)\nTempt(dominic, gera)\nDispread(gera, dominic)\nPlumb(gera)\nSickish(gera)\nAlvine(gera)\nPending(gera)\nTempt(gera, dominic)\nforall x (Tempt(x, dominic) and Flash(x, dominic) -> Alvine(dominic))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) and Tempt(x, gera) -> Flash(gera, dominic))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) -> Flash(x, gera))\n\nnot Flash(gera, dominic)\n\nCorporeal(dominic) and Tempt(dominic, gera) and forall x (Corporeal(x) and Tempt(x, gera) -> Flash(gera, dominic)) -> therefore Flash(gera, dominic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The justis tinkle the lark. The justis is vulvar. The justis is submerged. The justis is emmetropic. The justis allude the lark. The justis spawn the lark. The lark tinkle the justis. The lark is vulvar. The lark is submerged. The lark is jumbo. The lark is coronary. The lark spawn the justis. If something spawn the justis and it allude the justis then the justis is jumbo. If something is emmetropic and it spawn the lark then the lark allude the justis. If something is emmetropic then it allude the lark. The justis is jumbo.", "logic": "\nTinkle(justis, lark)\nVulvar(justis)\nSubmerged(justis)\nEmmetropic(justis)\nAllude(justis, lark)\nSpawn(justis, lark)\nTinkle(lark, justis)\nVulvar(lark)\nSubmerged(lark)\nJumbo(lark)\nCoronary(lark)\nSpawn(lark, justis)\nforall x (Spawn(x, justis) and Allude(x, justis) -> Jumbo(justis))\nforall x (Emmetropic(x) and Spawn(x, lark) -> Allude(lark, justis))\nforall x (Emmetropic(x) -> Allude(x, lark))\n\nJumbo(justis)\n\nEmmetropic(justis) and Spawn(justis, lark) and forall x (Emmetropic(x) and Spawn(x, lark) -> Allude(lark, justis)) -> therefore Allude(lark, justis) Spawn(lark, justis) and Allude(lark, justis) and forall x (Spawn(x, justis) and Allude(x, justis) -> Jumbo(justis)) -> therefore Jumbo(justis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The bernette graph the muriel. The bernette is nilpotent. The bernette is accrued. The bernette is saved. The bernette coal the muriel. The bernette apply the muriel. The muriel graph the bernette. The muriel is nilpotent. The muriel is accrued. The muriel is geriatric. The muriel is yellow. The muriel apply the bernette. If something apply the bernette and it coal the bernette then the bernette is geriatric. If something is saved and it apply the muriel then the muriel coal the bernette. If something is saved then it coal the muriel. The bernette is not geriatric.", "logic": "\nGraph(bernette, muriel)\nNilpotent(bernette)\nAccrued(bernette)\nSaved(bernette)\nCoal(bernette, muriel)\nApply(bernette, muriel)\nGraph(muriel, bernette)\nNilpotent(muriel)\nAccrued(muriel)\nGeriatric(muriel)\nYellow(muriel)\nApply(muriel, bernette)\nforall x (Apply(x, bernette) and Coal(x, bernette) -> Geriatric(bernette))\nforall x (Saved(x) and Apply(x, muriel) -> Coal(muriel, bernette))\nforall x (Saved(x) -> Coal(x, muriel))\n\nnot Geriatric(bernette)\n\nSaved(bernette) and Apply(bernette, muriel) and forall x (Saved(x) and Apply(x, muriel) -> Coal(muriel, bernette)) -> therefore Coal(muriel, bernette) Apply(muriel, bernette) and Coal(muriel, bernette) and forall x (Apply(x, bernette) and Coal(x, bernette) -> Geriatric(bernette)) -> therefore Geriatric(bernette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The rubi hydroplane the dorris. The rubi is marine. The rubi is aflare. The rubi is roasted. The rubi kneel the dorris. The rubi ravish the dorris. The dorris hydroplane the rubi. The dorris is marine. The dorris is aflare. The dorris is gallican. The dorris is corrupted. The dorris ravish the rubi. If something ravish the rubi and it kneel the rubi then the rubi is gallican. If something is roasted and it ravish the dorris then the dorris kneel the rubi. If something is roasted then it kneel the dorris. The dorris does not need the dorris.", "logic": "\nHydroplane(rubi, dorris)\nMarine(rubi)\nAflare(rubi)\nRoasted(rubi)\nKneel(rubi, dorris)\nRavish(rubi, dorris)\nHydroplane(dorris, rubi)\nMarine(dorris)\nAflare(dorris)\nGallican(dorris)\nCorrupted(dorris)\nRavish(dorris, rubi)\nforall x (Ravish(x, rubi) and Kneel(x, rubi) -> Gallican(rubi))\nforall x (Roasted(x) and Ravish(x, dorris) -> Kneel(dorris, rubi))\nforall x (Roasted(x) -> Kneel(x, dorris))\n\nnot Kneel(dorris, dorris)\n\nforall x (Roasted(x) -> Kneel(x, dorris)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The marlene indwell the gabriello. The marlene is delusional. The marlene is accentual. The marlene is blushing. The marlene protrude the gabriello. The marlene procure the gabriello. The gabriello indwell the marlene. The gabriello is delusional. The gabriello is accentual. The gabriello is rusted. The gabriello is drinkable. The gabriello procure the marlene. If something procure the marlene and it protrude the marlene then the marlene is rusted. If something is blushing and it procure the gabriello then the gabriello protrude the marlene. If something is blushing then it protrude the gabriello. The gabriello procure the gabriello.", "logic": "\nIndwell(marlene, gabriello)\nDelusional(marlene)\nAccentual(marlene)\nBlushing(marlene)\nProtrude(marlene, gabriello)\nProcure(marlene, gabriello)\nIndwell(gabriello, marlene)\nDelusional(gabriello)\nAccentual(gabriello)\nRusted(gabriello)\nDrinkable(gabriello)\nProcure(gabriello, marlene)\nforall x (Procure(x, marlene) and Protrude(x, marlene) -> Rusted(marlene))\nforall x (Blushing(x) and Procure(x, gabriello) -> Protrude(gabriello, marlene))\nforall x (Blushing(x) -> Protrude(x, gabriello))\n\nProcure(gabriello, gabriello)\n\nProcure(gabriello, gabriello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The selby disqualify the hal. The selby is ungenerous. The selby is annual. The selby is trigonal. The selby ante the hal. The selby disguise the hal. The hal disqualify the selby. The hal is ungenerous. The hal is annual. The hal is essene. The hal is rackety. The hal disguise the selby. If something disguise the selby and it ante the selby then the selby is essene. If something is trigonal and it disguise the hal then the hal ante the selby. If something is trigonal then it ante the hal. The hal does not chase the hal.", "logic": "\nDisqualify(selby, hal)\nUngenerous(selby)\nAnnual(selby)\nTrigonal(selby)\nAnte(selby, hal)\nDisguise(selby, hal)\nDisqualify(hal, selby)\nUngenerous(hal)\nAnnual(hal)\nEssene(hal)\nRackety(hal)\nDisguise(hal, selby)\nforall x (Disguise(x, selby) and Ante(x, selby) -> Essene(selby))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) and Disguise(x, hal) -> Ante(hal, selby))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> Ante(x, hal))\n\nnot Disqualify(hal, hal)\n\nnot Disqualify(hal, hal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The melantha darn the kelila. The melantha is anaerobic. The melantha is jolting. The melantha is perishable. The melantha score the kelila. The melantha jangle the kelila. The kelila darn the melantha. The kelila is anaerobic. The kelila is jolting. The kelila is ochre. The kelila is pectineal. The kelila jangle the melantha. If something jangle the melantha and it score the melantha then the melantha is ochre. If something is perishable and it jangle the kelila then the kelila score the melantha. If something is perishable then it score the kelila. The melantha is pectineal.", "logic": "\nDarn(melantha, kelila)\nAnaerobic(melantha)\nJolting(melantha)\nPerishable(melantha)\nScore(melantha, kelila)\nJangle(melantha, kelila)\nDarn(kelila, melantha)\nAnaerobic(kelila)\nJolting(kelila)\nOchre(kelila)\nPectineal(kelila)\nJangle(kelila, melantha)\nforall x (Jangle(x, melantha) and Score(x, melantha) -> Ochre(melantha))\nforall x (Perishable(x) and Jangle(x, kelila) -> Score(kelila, melantha))\nforall x (Perishable(x) -> Score(x, kelila))\n\nPectineal(melantha)\n\nPectineal(melantha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The oreste bemuse the kristyn. The oreste is subsequent. The oreste is postexilic. The oreste is percipient. The oreste snag the kristyn. The oreste modify the kristyn. The kristyn bemuse the oreste. The kristyn is subsequent. The kristyn is postexilic. The kristyn is easygoing. The kristyn is virgin. The kristyn modify the oreste. If something modify the oreste and it snag the oreste then the oreste is easygoing. If something is percipient and it modify the kristyn then the kristyn snag the oreste. If something is percipient then it snag the kristyn. The kristyn is not percipient.", "logic": "\nBemuse(oreste, kristyn)\nSubsequent(oreste)\nPostexilic(oreste)\nPercipient(oreste)\nSnag(oreste, kristyn)\nModify(oreste, kristyn)\nBemuse(kristyn, oreste)\nSubsequent(kristyn)\nPostexilic(kristyn)\nEasygoing(kristyn)\nVirgin(kristyn)\nModify(kristyn, oreste)\nforall x (Modify(x, oreste) and Snag(x, oreste) -> Easygoing(oreste))\nforall x (Percipient(x) and Modify(x, kristyn) -> Snag(kristyn, oreste))\nforall x (Percipient(x) -> Snag(x, kristyn))\n\nnot Percipient(kristyn)\n\nnot Percipient(kristyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The errol circumfuse the virgie. The errol is epiphytic. The errol is ubiquitous. The errol is convivial. The errol intermarry the virgie. The errol derestrict the virgie. The virgie circumfuse the errol. The virgie is epiphytic. The virgie is ubiquitous. The virgie is refreshing. The virgie is repetitive. The virgie derestrict the errol. If something derestrict the errol and it intermarry the errol then the errol is refreshing. If something is convivial and it derestrict the virgie then the virgie intermarry the errol. If something is convivial then it intermarry the virgie. The errol derestrict the errol.", "logic": "\nCircumfuse(errol, virgie)\nEpiphytic(errol)\nUbiquitous(errol)\nConvivial(errol)\nIntermarry(errol, virgie)\nDerestrict(errol, virgie)\nCircumfuse(virgie, errol)\nEpiphytic(virgie)\nUbiquitous(virgie)\nRefreshing(virgie)\nRepetitive(virgie)\nDerestrict(virgie, errol)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, errol) and Intermarry(x, errol) -> Refreshing(errol))\nforall x (Convivial(x) and Derestrict(x, virgie) -> Intermarry(virgie, errol))\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Intermarry(x, virgie))\n\nDerestrict(errol, errol)\n\nDerestrict(errol, errol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The noelani does not eat the tessa. The tessa evangelise the noelani. If something legitimise the noelani and the noelani legitimise the tessa then the tessa is not worthy. If something evangelise the noelani then the noelani copy the tessa. If something evangelise the noelani and it copy the noelani then it copy the tessa. If something legitimise the tessa and it is affiliated then the tessa copy the noelani. If the tessa evangelise the noelani and the noelani copy the tessa then the noelani legitimise the tessa. If something is worthy then it legitimise the noelani. If something copy the noelani and the noelani is blooded then the noelani is nonporous. If something legitimise the noelani and the noelani does not visit the tessa then the noelani is blooded. The noelani does not eat the tessa.", "logic": "\nnot Evangelise(noelani, tessa)\nEvangelise(tessa, noelani)\nforall x (Legitimise(x, noelani) and Legitimise(noelani, tessa) -> not Worthy(tessa))\nforall x (Evangelise(x, noelani) -> Copy(noelani, tessa))\nforall x (Evangelise(x, noelani) and Copy(x, noelani) -> Copy(x, tessa))\nforall x (Legitimise(x, tessa) and Affiliated(x) -> Copy(tessa, noelani))\nEvangelise(tessa, noelani) and Copy(noelani, tessa) -> Legitimise(noelani, tessa)\nforall x (Worthy(x) -> Legitimise(x, noelani))\nforall x (Copy(x, noelani) and Blooded(noelani) -> Nonporous(noelani))\nforall x (Legitimise(x, noelani) and not Copy(noelani, tessa) -> Blooded(noelani))\n\nnot Evangelise(noelani, tessa)\n\ntherefore not Evangelise(noelani, tessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The lorraine does not eat the benedetta. The benedetta cluck the lorraine. If something interweave the lorraine and the lorraine interweave the benedetta then the benedetta is not weensy. If something cluck the lorraine then the lorraine iodise the benedetta. If something cluck the lorraine and it iodise the lorraine then it iodise the benedetta. If something interweave the benedetta and it is horizontal then the benedetta iodise the lorraine. If the benedetta cluck the lorraine and the lorraine iodise the benedetta then the lorraine interweave the benedetta. If something is weensy then it interweave the lorraine. If something iodise the lorraine and the lorraine is plane then the lorraine is butcherly. If something interweave the lorraine and the lorraine does not visit the benedetta then the lorraine is plane. The lorraine cluck the benedetta.", "logic": "\nnot Cluck(lorraine, benedetta)\nCluck(benedetta, lorraine)\nforall x (Interweave(x, lorraine) and Interweave(lorraine, benedetta) -> not Weensy(benedetta))\nforall x (Cluck(x, lorraine) -> Iodise(lorraine, benedetta))\nforall x (Cluck(x, lorraine) and Iodise(x, lorraine) -> Iodise(x, benedetta))\nforall x (Interweave(x, benedetta) and Horizontal(x) -> Iodise(benedetta, lorraine))\nCluck(benedetta, lorraine) and Iodise(lorraine, benedetta) -> Interweave(lorraine, benedetta)\nforall x (Weensy(x) -> Interweave(x, lorraine))\nforall x (Iodise(x, lorraine) and Plane(lorraine) -> Butcherly(lorraine))\nforall x (Interweave(x, lorraine) and not Iodise(lorraine, benedetta) -> Plane(lorraine))\n\nCluck(lorraine, benedetta)\n\ntherefore not Cluck(lorraine, benedetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The leland does not eat the arie. The arie contemn the leland. If something evidence the leland and the leland evidence the arie then the arie is not skilled. If something contemn the leland then the leland ripple the arie. If something contemn the leland and it ripple the leland then it ripple the arie. If something evidence the arie and it is defensible then the arie ripple the leland. If the arie contemn the leland and the leland ripple the arie then the leland evidence the arie. If something is skilled then it evidence the leland. If something ripple the leland and the leland is cruciform then the leland is thickset. If something evidence the leland and the leland does not visit the arie then the leland is cruciform. The leland ripple the arie.", "logic": "\nnot Contemn(leland, arie)\nContemn(arie, leland)\nforall x (Evidence(x, leland) and Evidence(leland, arie) -> not Skilled(arie))\nforall x (Contemn(x, leland) -> Ripple(leland, arie))\nforall x (Contemn(x, leland) and Ripple(x, leland) -> Ripple(x, arie))\nforall x (Evidence(x, arie) and Defensible(x) -> Ripple(arie, leland))\nContemn(arie, leland) and Ripple(leland, arie) -> Evidence(leland, arie)\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Evidence(x, leland))\nforall x (Ripple(x, leland) and Cruciform(leland) -> Thickset(leland))\nforall x (Evidence(x, leland) and not Ripple(leland, arie) -> Cruciform(leland))\n\nRipple(leland, arie)\n\nContemn(arie, leland) and forall x (Contemn(x, leland) -> Ripple(leland, arie)) -> therefore Ripple(leland, arie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The lilli does not eat the jonny. The jonny succor the lilli. If something incise the lilli and the lilli incise the jonny then the jonny is not embryonal. If something succor the lilli then the lilli loaf the jonny. If something succor the lilli and it loaf the lilli then it loaf the jonny. If something incise the jonny and it is taut then the jonny loaf the lilli. If the jonny succor the lilli and the lilli loaf the jonny then the lilli incise the jonny. If something is embryonal then it incise the lilli. If something loaf the lilli and the lilli is enzymatic then the lilli is rasping. If something incise the lilli and the lilli does not visit the jonny then the lilli is enzymatic. The lilli does not visit the jonny.", "logic": "\nnot Succor(lilli, jonny)\nSuccor(jonny, lilli)\nforall x (Incise(x, lilli) and Incise(lilli, jonny) -> not Embryonal(jonny))\nforall x (Succor(x, lilli) -> Loaf(lilli, jonny))\nforall x (Succor(x, lilli) and Loaf(x, lilli) -> Loaf(x, jonny))\nforall x (Incise(x, jonny) and Taut(x) -> Loaf(jonny, lilli))\nSuccor(jonny, lilli) and Loaf(lilli, jonny) -> Incise(lilli, jonny)\nforall x (Embryonal(x) -> Incise(x, lilli))\nforall x (Loaf(x, lilli) and Enzymatic(lilli) -> Rasping(lilli))\nforall x (Incise(x, lilli) and not Loaf(lilli, jonny) -> Enzymatic(lilli))\n\nnot Loaf(lilli, jonny)\n\nSuccor(jonny, lilli) and forall x (Succor(x, lilli) -> Loaf(lilli, jonny)) -> therefore Loaf(lilli, jonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The leah does not eat the noemi. The noemi ruckle the leah. If something supplicate the leah and the leah supplicate the noemi then the noemi is not barreled. If something ruckle the leah then the leah grate the noemi. If something ruckle the leah and it grate the leah then it grate the noemi. If something supplicate the noemi and it is manic then the noemi grate the leah. If the noemi ruckle the leah and the leah grate the noemi then the leah supplicate the noemi. If something is barreled then it supplicate the leah. If something grate the leah and the leah is narcotized then the leah is finished. If something supplicate the leah and the leah does not visit the noemi then the leah is narcotized. The leah supplicate the noemi.", "logic": "\nnot Ruckle(leah, noemi)\nRuckle(noemi, leah)\nforall x (Supplicate(x, leah) and Supplicate(leah, noemi) -> not Barreled(noemi))\nforall x (Ruckle(x, leah) -> Grate(leah, noemi))\nforall x (Ruckle(x, leah) and Grate(x, leah) -> Grate(x, noemi))\nforall x (Supplicate(x, noemi) and Manic(x) -> Grate(noemi, leah))\nRuckle(noemi, leah) and Grate(leah, noemi) -> Supplicate(leah, noemi)\nforall x (Barreled(x) -> Supplicate(x, leah))\nforall x (Grate(x, leah) and Narcotized(leah) -> Finished(leah))\nforall x (Supplicate(x, leah) and not Grate(leah, noemi) -> Narcotized(leah))\n\nSupplicate(leah, noemi)\n\nRuckle(noemi, leah) and forall x (Ruckle(x, leah) -> Grate(leah, noemi)) -> therefore Grate(leah, noemi) Ruckle(noemi, leah) and Grate(leah, noemi) and Ruckle(noemi, leah) and Grate(leah, noemi) -> Supplicate(leah, noemi) -> therefore Supplicate(leah, noemi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The natalia does not eat the antony. The antony anatomise the natalia. If something surge the natalia and the natalia surge the antony then the antony is not sickly. If something anatomise the natalia then the natalia rinse the antony. If something anatomise the natalia and it rinse the natalia then it rinse the antony. If something surge the antony and it is rambling then the antony rinse the natalia. If the antony anatomise the natalia and the natalia rinse the antony then the natalia surge the antony. If something is sickly then it surge the natalia. If something rinse the natalia and the natalia is nigerien then the natalia is abnaki. If something surge the natalia and the natalia does not visit the antony then the natalia is nigerien. The natalia does not see the antony.", "logic": "\nnot Anatomise(natalia, antony)\nAnatomise(antony, natalia)\nforall x (Surge(x, natalia) and Surge(natalia, antony) -> not Sickly(antony))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, natalia) -> Rinse(natalia, antony))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, natalia) and Rinse(x, natalia) -> Rinse(x, antony))\nforall x (Surge(x, antony) and Rambling(x) -> Rinse(antony, natalia))\nAnatomise(antony, natalia) and Rinse(natalia, antony) -> Surge(natalia, antony)\nforall x (Sickly(x) -> Surge(x, natalia))\nforall x (Rinse(x, natalia) and Nigerien(natalia) -> Abnaki(natalia))\nforall x (Surge(x, natalia) and not Rinse(natalia, antony) -> Nigerien(natalia))\n\nnot Surge(natalia, antony)\n\nAnatomise(antony, natalia) and forall x (Anatomise(x, natalia) -> Rinse(natalia, antony)) -> therefore Rinse(natalia, antony) Anatomise(antony, natalia) and Rinse(natalia, antony) and Anatomise(antony, natalia) and Rinse(natalia, antony) -> Surge(natalia, antony) -> therefore Surge(natalia, antony)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The sawyere does not eat the collie. The collie polarise the sawyere. If something chap the sawyere and the sawyere chap the collie then the collie is not sundry. If something polarise the sawyere then the sawyere effervesce the collie. If something polarise the sawyere and it effervesce the sawyere then it effervesce the collie. If something chap the collie and it is moneyless then the collie effervesce the sawyere. If the collie polarise the sawyere and the sawyere effervesce the collie then the sawyere chap the collie. If something is sundry then it chap the sawyere. If something effervesce the sawyere and the sawyere is ostensible then the sawyere is socratic. If something chap the sawyere and the sawyere does not visit the collie then the sawyere is ostensible. The sawyere is not ostensible.", "logic": "\nnot Polarise(sawyere, collie)\nPolarise(collie, sawyere)\nforall x (Chap(x, sawyere) and Chap(sawyere, collie) -> not Sundry(collie))\nforall x (Polarise(x, sawyere) -> Effervesce(sawyere, collie))\nforall x (Polarise(x, sawyere) and Effervesce(x, sawyere) -> Effervesce(x, collie))\nforall x (Chap(x, collie) and Moneyless(x) -> Effervesce(collie, sawyere))\nPolarise(collie, sawyere) and Effervesce(sawyere, collie) -> Chap(sawyere, collie)\nforall x (Sundry(x) -> Chap(x, sawyere))\nforall x (Effervesce(x, sawyere) and Ostensible(sawyere) -> Socratic(sawyere))\nforall x (Chap(x, sawyere) and not Effervesce(sawyere, collie) -> Ostensible(sawyere))\n\nnot Ostensible(sawyere)\n\nforall x (Chap(x, sawyere) and not Effervesce(sawyere, collie) -> Ostensible(sawyere)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The alec does not eat the lesya. The lesya evaluate the alec. If something press the alec and the alec press the lesya then the lesya is not clinical. If something evaluate the alec then the alec clean the lesya. If something evaluate the alec and it clean the alec then it clean the lesya. If something press the lesya and it is thudding then the lesya clean the alec. If the lesya evaluate the alec and the alec clean the lesya then the alec press the lesya. If something is clinical then it press the alec. If something clean the alec and the alec is lucid then the alec is anal. If something press the alec and the alec does not visit the lesya then the alec is lucid. The alec press the alec.", "logic": "\nnot Evaluate(alec, lesya)\nEvaluate(lesya, alec)\nforall x (Press(x, alec) and Press(alec, lesya) -> not Clinical(lesya))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, alec) -> Clean(alec, lesya))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, alec) and Clean(x, alec) -> Clean(x, lesya))\nforall x (Press(x, lesya) and Thudding(x) -> Clean(lesya, alec))\nEvaluate(lesya, alec) and Clean(alec, lesya) -> Press(alec, lesya)\nforall x (Clinical(x) -> Press(x, alec))\nforall x (Clean(x, alec) and Lucid(alec) -> Anal(alec))\nforall x (Press(x, alec) and not Clean(alec, lesya) -> Lucid(alec))\n\nPress(alec, alec)\n\nforall x (Clinical(x) -> Press(x, alec)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The sharia does not eat the julianna. The julianna cover the sharia. If something sculpture the sharia and the sharia sculpture the julianna then the julianna is not august. If something cover the sharia then the sharia premier the julianna. If something cover the sharia and it premier the sharia then it premier the julianna. If something sculpture the julianna and it is audenesque then the julianna premier the sharia. If the julianna cover the sharia and the sharia premier the julianna then the sharia sculpture the julianna. If something is august then it sculpture the sharia. If something premier the sharia and the sharia is literate then the sharia is occult. If something sculpture the sharia and the sharia does not visit the julianna then the sharia is literate. The julianna does not visit the sharia.", "logic": "\nnot Cover(sharia, julianna)\nCover(julianna, sharia)\nforall x (Sculpture(x, sharia) and Sculpture(sharia, julianna) -> not August(julianna))\nforall x (Cover(x, sharia) -> Premier(sharia, julianna))\nforall x (Cover(x, sharia) and Premier(x, sharia) -> Premier(x, julianna))\nforall x (Sculpture(x, julianna) and Audenesque(x) -> Premier(julianna, sharia))\nCover(julianna, sharia) and Premier(sharia, julianna) -> Sculpture(sharia, julianna)\nforall x (August(x) -> Sculpture(x, sharia))\nforall x (Premier(x, sharia) and Literate(sharia) -> Occult(sharia))\nforall x (Sculpture(x, sharia) and not Premier(sharia, julianna) -> Literate(sharia))\n\nnot Premier(julianna, sharia)\n\nforall x (Sculpture(x, julianna) and Audenesque(x) -> Premier(julianna, sharia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The eloise does not eat the meghann. The meghann wake the eloise. If something budget the eloise and the eloise budget the meghann then the meghann is not pictural. If something wake the eloise then the eloise junketeer the meghann. If something wake the eloise and it junketeer the eloise then it junketeer the meghann. If something budget the meghann and it is grown then the meghann junketeer the eloise. If the meghann wake the eloise and the eloise junketeer the meghann then the eloise budget the meghann. If something is pictural then it budget the eloise. If something junketeer the eloise and the eloise is atheist then the eloise is amort. If something budget the eloise and the eloise does not visit the meghann then the eloise is atheist. The meghann is amort.", "logic": "\nnot Wake(eloise, meghann)\nWake(meghann, eloise)\nforall x (Budget(x, eloise) and Budget(eloise, meghann) -> not Pictural(meghann))\nforall x (Wake(x, eloise) -> Junketeer(eloise, meghann))\nforall x (Wake(x, eloise) and Junketeer(x, eloise) -> Junketeer(x, meghann))\nforall x (Budget(x, meghann) and Grown(x) -> Junketeer(meghann, eloise))\nWake(meghann, eloise) and Junketeer(eloise, meghann) -> Budget(eloise, meghann)\nforall x (Pictural(x) -> Budget(x, eloise))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, eloise) and Atheist(eloise) -> Amort(eloise))\nforall x (Budget(x, eloise) and not Junketeer(eloise, meghann) -> Atheist(eloise))\n\nAmort(meghann)\n\nAmort(meghann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The aindrea does not eat the aloisia. The aloisia exclude the aindrea. If something slue the aindrea and the aindrea slue the aloisia then the aloisia is not paniculate. If something exclude the aindrea then the aindrea provoke the aloisia. If something exclude the aindrea and it provoke the aindrea then it provoke the aloisia. If something slue the aloisia and it is futureless then the aloisia provoke the aindrea. If the aloisia exclude the aindrea and the aindrea provoke the aloisia then the aindrea slue the aloisia. If something is paniculate then it slue the aindrea. If something provoke the aindrea and the aindrea is deceptive then the aindrea is unprovable. If something slue the aindrea and the aindrea does not visit the aloisia then the aindrea is deceptive. The aloisia does not see the aloisia.", "logic": "\nnot Exclude(aindrea, aloisia)\nExclude(aloisia, aindrea)\nforall x (Slue(x, aindrea) and Slue(aindrea, aloisia) -> not Paniculate(aloisia))\nforall x (Exclude(x, aindrea) -> Provoke(aindrea, aloisia))\nforall x (Exclude(x, aindrea) and Provoke(x, aindrea) -> Provoke(x, aloisia))\nforall x (Slue(x, aloisia) and Futureless(x) -> Provoke(aloisia, aindrea))\nExclude(aloisia, aindrea) and Provoke(aindrea, aloisia) -> Slue(aindrea, aloisia)\nforall x (Paniculate(x) -> Slue(x, aindrea))\nforall x (Provoke(x, aindrea) and Deceptive(aindrea) -> Unprovable(aindrea))\nforall x (Slue(x, aindrea) and not Provoke(aindrea, aloisia) -> Deceptive(aindrea))\n\nnot Slue(aloisia, aloisia)\n\nnot Slue(aloisia, aloisia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The phaedra does not eat the iormina. The iormina resonate the phaedra. If something cycle the phaedra and the phaedra cycle the iormina then the iormina is not unequaled. If something resonate the phaedra then the phaedra unfreeze the iormina. If something resonate the phaedra and it unfreeze the phaedra then it unfreeze the iormina. If something cycle the iormina and it is sixtieth then the iormina unfreeze the phaedra. If the iormina resonate the phaedra and the phaedra unfreeze the iormina then the phaedra cycle the iormina. If something is unequaled then it cycle the phaedra. If something unfreeze the phaedra and the phaedra is azimuthal then the phaedra is underarm. If something cycle the phaedra and the phaedra does not visit the iormina then the phaedra is azimuthal. The phaedra resonate the phaedra.", "logic": "\nnot Resonate(phaedra, iormina)\nResonate(iormina, phaedra)\nforall x (Cycle(x, phaedra) and Cycle(phaedra, iormina) -> not Unequaled(iormina))\nforall x (Resonate(x, phaedra) -> Unfreeze(phaedra, iormina))\nforall x (Resonate(x, phaedra) and Unfreeze(x, phaedra) -> Unfreeze(x, iormina))\nforall x (Cycle(x, iormina) and Sixtieth(x) -> Unfreeze(iormina, phaedra))\nResonate(iormina, phaedra) and Unfreeze(phaedra, iormina) -> Cycle(phaedra, iormina)\nforall x (Unequaled(x) -> Cycle(x, phaedra))\nforall x (Unfreeze(x, phaedra) and Azimuthal(phaedra) -> Underarm(phaedra))\nforall x (Cycle(x, phaedra) and not Unfreeze(phaedra, iormina) -> Azimuthal(phaedra))\n\nResonate(phaedra, phaedra)\n\nResonate(phaedra, phaedra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-813"} {"premises": "The lezlie frost the robina. The robina does not chase the lezlie. The judson frost the lezlie. If someone replay the robina then the robina is shirty. If someone frost the robina then they chase the robina. The lezlie frost the robina.", "logic": "\nFrost(lezlie, robina)\nnot Replay(robina, lezlie)\nFrost(judson, lezlie)\nforall x (Replay(x, robina) -> Shirty(robina))\nforall x (Frost(x, robina) -> Replay(x, robina))\n\nFrost(lezlie, robina)\n\ntherefore Frost(lezlie, robina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The timi palisade the temple. The temple does not chase the timi. The ludvig palisade the timi. If someone metricise the temple then the temple is varied. If someone palisade the temple then they chase the temple. The ludvig does not visit the timi.", "logic": "\nPalisade(timi, temple)\nnot Metricise(temple, timi)\nPalisade(ludvig, timi)\nforall x (Metricise(x, temple) -> Varied(temple))\nforall x (Palisade(x, temple) -> Metricise(x, temple))\n\nnot Palisade(ludvig, timi)\n\ntherefore Palisade(ludvig, timi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The derrol reignite the danit. The danit does not chase the derrol. The harvard reignite the derrol. If someone decalcify the danit then the danit is burdensome. If someone reignite the danit then they chase the danit. The derrol decalcify the danit.", "logic": "\nReignite(derrol, danit)\nnot Decalcify(danit, derrol)\nReignite(harvard, derrol)\nforall x (Decalcify(x, danit) -> Burdensome(danit))\nforall x (Reignite(x, danit) -> Decalcify(x, danit))\n\nDecalcify(derrol, danit)\n\nReignite(derrol, danit) and forall x (Reignite(x, danit) -> Decalcify(x, danit)) -> therefore Decalcify(derrol, danit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The roselle shrug the delores. The delores does not chase the roselle. The sallyann shrug the roselle. If someone symbolize the delores then the delores is linnaean. If someone shrug the delores then they chase the delores. The roselle does not chase the delores.", "logic": "\nShrug(roselle, delores)\nnot Symbolize(delores, roselle)\nShrug(sallyann, roselle)\nforall x (Symbolize(x, delores) -> Linnaean(delores))\nforall x (Shrug(x, delores) -> Symbolize(x, delores))\n\nnot Symbolize(roselle, delores)\n\nShrug(roselle, delores) and forall x (Shrug(x, delores) -> Symbolize(x, delores)) -> therefore Symbolize(roselle, delores)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The janine salvage the jewel. The jewel does not chase the janine. The ezekiel salvage the janine. If someone invert the jewel then the jewel is ceramic. If someone salvage the jewel then they chase the jewel. The jewel is ceramic.", "logic": "\nSalvage(janine, jewel)\nnot Invert(jewel, janine)\nSalvage(ezekiel, janine)\nforall x (Invert(x, jewel) -> Ceramic(jewel))\nforall x (Salvage(x, jewel) -> Invert(x, jewel))\n\nCeramic(jewel)\n\nSalvage(janine, jewel) and forall x (Salvage(x, jewel) -> Invert(x, jewel)) -> therefore Invert(janine, jewel) Invert(janine, jewel) and forall x (Invert(x, jewel) -> Ceramic(jewel)) -> therefore Ceramic(jewel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The rafaelia illumine the ramonda. The ramonda does not chase the rafaelia. The helena illumine the rafaelia. If someone labialize the ramonda then the ramonda is ownerless. If someone illumine the ramonda then they chase the ramonda. The ramonda is not ownerless.", "logic": "\nIllumine(rafaelia, ramonda)\nnot Labialize(ramonda, rafaelia)\nIllumine(helena, rafaelia)\nforall x (Labialize(x, ramonda) -> Ownerless(ramonda))\nforall x (Illumine(x, ramonda) -> Labialize(x, ramonda))\n\nnot Ownerless(ramonda)\n\nIllumine(rafaelia, ramonda) and forall x (Illumine(x, ramonda) -> Labialize(x, ramonda)) -> therefore Labialize(rafaelia, ramonda) Labialize(rafaelia, ramonda) and forall x (Labialize(x, ramonda) -> Ownerless(ramonda)) -> therefore Ownerless(ramonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The zelma inspirit the ingemar. The ingemar does not chase the zelma. The maggi inspirit the zelma. If someone buttonhole the ingemar then the ingemar is wifely. If someone inspirit the ingemar then they chase the ingemar. The ingemar does not chase the ingemar.", "logic": "\nInspirit(zelma, ingemar)\nnot Buttonhole(ingemar, zelma)\nInspirit(maggi, zelma)\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, ingemar) -> Wifely(ingemar))\nforall x (Inspirit(x, ingemar) -> Buttonhole(x, ingemar))\n\nnot Buttonhole(ingemar, ingemar)\n\nforall x (Inspirit(x, ingemar) -> Buttonhole(x, ingemar)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The mercy channelise the jonathon. The jonathon does not chase the mercy. The luci channelise the mercy. If someone rejoice the jonathon then the jonathon is calycinal. If someone channelise the jonathon then they chase the jonathon. The luci rejoice the jonathon.", "logic": "\nChannelise(mercy, jonathon)\nnot Rejoice(jonathon, mercy)\nChannelise(luci, mercy)\nforall x (Rejoice(x, jonathon) -> Calycinal(jonathon))\nforall x (Channelise(x, jonathon) -> Rejoice(x, jonathon))\n\nRejoice(luci, jonathon)\n\nforall x (Channelise(x, jonathon) -> Rejoice(x, jonathon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The rosalie bellyache the michele. The michele does not chase the rosalie. The durward bellyache the rosalie. If someone permute the michele then the michele is occluded. If someone bellyache the michele then they chase the michele. The rosalie does not chase the durward.", "logic": "\nBellyache(rosalie, michele)\nnot Permute(michele, rosalie)\nBellyache(durward, rosalie)\nforall x (Permute(x, michele) -> Occluded(michele))\nforall x (Bellyache(x, michele) -> Permute(x, michele))\n\nnot Permute(rosalie, durward)\n\nnot Permute(rosalie, durward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The wendall astringe the garp. The garp does not chase the wendall. The beverlee astringe the wendall. If someone jerk the garp then the garp is tripartite. If someone astringe the garp then they chase the garp. The wendall astringe the beverlee.", "logic": "\nAstringe(wendall, garp)\nnot Jerk(garp, wendall)\nAstringe(beverlee, wendall)\nforall x (Jerk(x, garp) -> Tripartite(garp))\nforall x (Astringe(x, garp) -> Jerk(x, garp))\n\nAstringe(wendall, beverlee)\n\nAstringe(wendall, beverlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The reese coapt the ginnifer. The ginnifer does not chase the reese. The ninetta coapt the reese. If someone divine the ginnifer then the ginnifer is incurable. If someone coapt the ginnifer then they chase the ginnifer. The ginnifer does not visit the reese.", "logic": "\nCoapt(reese, ginnifer)\nnot Divine(ginnifer, reese)\nCoapt(ninetta, reese)\nforall x (Divine(x, ginnifer) -> Incurable(ginnifer))\nforall x (Coapt(x, ginnifer) -> Divine(x, ginnifer))\n\nnot Coapt(ginnifer, reese)\n\nnot Coapt(ginnifer, reese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The marley intrude the marian. The marian does not chase the marley. The jerrie intrude the marley. If someone infuriate the marian then the marian is corporeal. If someone intrude the marian then they chase the marian. The marley eats the jerrie.", "logic": "\nIntrude(marley, marian)\nnot Infuriate(marian, marley)\nIntrude(jerrie, marley)\nforall x (Infuriate(x, marian) -> Corporeal(marian))\nforall x (Intrude(x, marian) -> Infuriate(x, marian))\n\nEats(marley, jerrie)\n\nEats(marley, jerrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-958"} {"premises": "The lenny disrobe the tildie. The lenny reveal the tildie. The lenny is umber. The lenny is untrusty. The lenny is skilled. The lenny is lanate. The lenny is right. The lenny mismate the tildie. The tildie disrobe the lenny. The tildie reveal the lenny. The tildie is umber. The tildie is untrusty. The tildie is skilled. The tildie is lanate. The tildie is right. The tildie mismate the lenny. If someone is umber and they see the lenny then the lenny reveal the tildie. If someone is skilled then they eat the lenny. If someone mismate the tildie then the tildie is umber. If someone is skilled and they see the tildie then they chase the tildie. If someone is untrusty and umber then they see the tildie. If someone reveal the tildie and they see the lenny then they chase the tildie. The tildie is lanate.", "logic": "\nDisrobe(lenny, tildie)\nReveal(lenny, tildie)\nUmber(lenny)\nUntrusty(lenny)\nSkilled(lenny)\nLanate(lenny)\nRight(lenny)\nMismate(lenny, tildie)\nDisrobe(tildie, lenny)\nReveal(tildie, lenny)\nUmber(tildie)\nUntrusty(tildie)\nSkilled(tildie)\nLanate(tildie)\nRight(tildie)\nMismate(tildie, lenny)\nforall x (Umber(x) and Mismate(x, lenny) -> Reveal(lenny, tildie))\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Reveal(x, lenny))\nforall x (Mismate(x, tildie) -> Umber(tildie))\nforall x (Skilled(x) and Mismate(x, tildie) -> Disrobe(x, tildie))\nforall x (Untrusty(x) and Umber(x) -> Mismate(x, tildie))\nforall x (Reveal(x, tildie) and Mismate(x, lenny) -> Disrobe(x, tildie))\n\nLanate(tildie)\n\ntherefore Lanate(tildie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The lizbeth cudgel the emanuela. The lizbeth bottle the emanuela. The lizbeth is outspread. The lizbeth is aramean. The lizbeth is confiding. The lizbeth is diffident. The lizbeth is indie. The lizbeth orate the emanuela. The emanuela cudgel the lizbeth. The emanuela bottle the lizbeth. The emanuela is outspread. The emanuela is aramean. The emanuela is confiding. The emanuela is diffident. The emanuela is indie. The emanuela orate the lizbeth. If someone is outspread and they see the lizbeth then the lizbeth bottle the emanuela. If someone is confiding then they eat the lizbeth. If someone orate the emanuela then the emanuela is outspread. If someone is confiding and they see the emanuela then they chase the emanuela. If someone is aramean and outspread then they see the emanuela. If someone bottle the emanuela and they see the lizbeth then they chase the emanuela. The emanuela is not aramean.", "logic": "\nCudgel(lizbeth, emanuela)\nBottle(lizbeth, emanuela)\nOutspread(lizbeth)\nAramean(lizbeth)\nConfiding(lizbeth)\nDiffident(lizbeth)\nIndie(lizbeth)\nOrate(lizbeth, emanuela)\nCudgel(emanuela, lizbeth)\nBottle(emanuela, lizbeth)\nOutspread(emanuela)\nAramean(emanuela)\nConfiding(emanuela)\nDiffident(emanuela)\nIndie(emanuela)\nOrate(emanuela, lizbeth)\nforall x (Outspread(x) and Orate(x, lizbeth) -> Bottle(lizbeth, emanuela))\nforall x (Confiding(x) -> Bottle(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Orate(x, emanuela) -> Outspread(emanuela))\nforall x (Confiding(x) and Orate(x, emanuela) -> Cudgel(x, emanuela))\nforall x (Aramean(x) and Outspread(x) -> Orate(x, emanuela))\nforall x (Bottle(x, emanuela) and Orate(x, lizbeth) -> Cudgel(x, emanuela))\n\nnot Aramean(emanuela)\n\ntherefore Aramean(emanuela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The cyb grizzle the englebart. The cyb escalate the englebart. The cyb is unbeatable. The cyb is bratty. The cyb is ottoman. The cyb is hopeful. The cyb is cathedral. The cyb ignore the englebart. The englebart grizzle the cyb. The englebart escalate the cyb. The englebart is unbeatable. The englebart is bratty. The englebart is ottoman. The englebart is hopeful. The englebart is cathedral. The englebart ignore the cyb. If someone is unbeatable and they see the cyb then the cyb escalate the englebart. If someone is ottoman then they eat the cyb. If someone ignore the englebart then the englebart is unbeatable. If someone is ottoman and they see the englebart then they chase the englebart. If someone is bratty and unbeatable then they see the englebart. If someone escalate the englebart and they see the cyb then they chase the englebart. The englebart ignore the englebart.", "logic": "\nGrizzle(cyb, englebart)\nEscalate(cyb, englebart)\nUnbeatable(cyb)\nBratty(cyb)\nOttoman(cyb)\nHopeful(cyb)\nCathedral(cyb)\nIgnore(cyb, englebart)\nGrizzle(englebart, cyb)\nEscalate(englebart, cyb)\nUnbeatable(englebart)\nBratty(englebart)\nOttoman(englebart)\nHopeful(englebart)\nCathedral(englebart)\nIgnore(englebart, cyb)\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) and Ignore(x, cyb) -> Escalate(cyb, englebart))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) -> Escalate(x, cyb))\nforall x (Ignore(x, englebart) -> Unbeatable(englebart))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) and Ignore(x, englebart) -> Grizzle(x, englebart))\nforall x (Bratty(x) and Unbeatable(x) -> Ignore(x, englebart))\nforall x (Escalate(x, englebart) and Ignore(x, cyb) -> Grizzle(x, englebart))\n\nIgnore(englebart, englebart)\n\nBratty(englebart) and Unbeatable(englebart) and forall x (Bratty(x) and Unbeatable(x) -> Ignore(x, englebart)) -> therefore Ignore(englebart, englebart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The esau skipper the cristen. The esau presuppose the cristen. The esau is foggy. The esau is matt. The esau is tsaristic. The esau is must. The esau is chaldee. The esau short the cristen. The cristen skipper the esau. The cristen presuppose the esau. The cristen is foggy. The cristen is matt. The cristen is tsaristic. The cristen is must. The cristen is chaldee. The cristen short the esau. If someone is foggy and they see the esau then the esau presuppose the cristen. If someone is tsaristic then they eat the esau. If someone short the cristen then the cristen is foggy. If someone is tsaristic and they see the cristen then they chase the cristen. If someone is matt and foggy then they see the cristen. If someone presuppose the cristen and they see the esau then they chase the cristen. The esau does not eat the esau.", "logic": "\nSkipper(esau, cristen)\nPresuppose(esau, cristen)\nFoggy(esau)\nMatt(esau)\nTsaristic(esau)\nMust(esau)\nChaldee(esau)\nShort(esau, cristen)\nSkipper(cristen, esau)\nPresuppose(cristen, esau)\nFoggy(cristen)\nMatt(cristen)\nTsaristic(cristen)\nMust(cristen)\nChaldee(cristen)\nShort(cristen, esau)\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Short(x, esau) -> Presuppose(esau, cristen))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Presuppose(x, esau))\nforall x (Short(x, cristen) -> Foggy(cristen))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and Short(x, cristen) -> Skipper(x, cristen))\nforall x (Matt(x) and Foggy(x) -> Short(x, cristen))\nforall x (Presuppose(x, cristen) and Short(x, esau) -> Skipper(x, cristen))\n\nnot Presuppose(esau, esau)\n\nTsaristic(esau) and forall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Presuppose(x, esau)) -> therefore Presuppose(esau, esau)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The janessa manifest the rod. The janessa nitrify the rod. The janessa is cyanophyte. The janessa is caseous. The janessa is upturned. The janessa is sullen. The janessa is blustery. The janessa balkanize the rod. The rod manifest the janessa. The rod nitrify the janessa. The rod is cyanophyte. The rod is caseous. The rod is upturned. The rod is sullen. The rod is blustery. The rod balkanize the janessa. If someone is cyanophyte and they see the janessa then the janessa nitrify the rod. If someone is upturned then they eat the janessa. If someone balkanize the rod then the rod is cyanophyte. If someone is upturned and they see the rod then they chase the rod. If someone is caseous and cyanophyte then they see the rod. If someone nitrify the rod and they see the janessa then they chase the rod. The rod manifest the rod.", "logic": "\nManifest(janessa, rod)\nNitrify(janessa, rod)\nCyanophyte(janessa)\nCaseous(janessa)\nUpturned(janessa)\nSullen(janessa)\nBlustery(janessa)\nBalkanize(janessa, rod)\nManifest(rod, janessa)\nNitrify(rod, janessa)\nCyanophyte(rod)\nCaseous(rod)\nUpturned(rod)\nSullen(rod)\nBlustery(rod)\nBalkanize(rod, janessa)\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) and Balkanize(x, janessa) -> Nitrify(janessa, rod))\nforall x (Upturned(x) -> Nitrify(x, janessa))\nforall x (Balkanize(x, rod) -> Cyanophyte(rod))\nforall x (Upturned(x) and Balkanize(x, rod) -> Manifest(x, rod))\nforall x (Caseous(x) and Cyanophyte(x) -> Balkanize(x, rod))\nforall x (Nitrify(x, rod) and Balkanize(x, janessa) -> Manifest(x, rod))\n\nManifest(rod, rod)\n\nCaseous(rod) and Cyanophyte(rod) and forall x (Caseous(x) and Cyanophyte(x) -> Balkanize(x, rod)) -> therefore Balkanize(rod, rod) Upturned(rod) and Balkanize(rod, rod) and forall x (Upturned(x) and Balkanize(x, rod) -> Manifest(x, rod)) -> therefore Manifest(rod, rod)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The karin reprobate the jeromy. The karin lasso the jeromy. The karin is acquired. The karin is oral. The karin is vedic. The karin is anachronic. The karin is meridian. The karin woolgather the jeromy. The jeromy reprobate the karin. The jeromy lasso the karin. The jeromy is acquired. The jeromy is oral. The jeromy is vedic. The jeromy is anachronic. The jeromy is meridian. The jeromy woolgather the karin. If someone is acquired and they see the karin then the karin lasso the jeromy. If someone is vedic then they eat the karin. If someone woolgather the jeromy then the jeromy is acquired. If someone is vedic and they see the jeromy then they chase the jeromy. If someone is oral and acquired then they see the jeromy. If someone lasso the jeromy and they see the karin then they chase the jeromy. The jeromy does not chase the jeromy.", "logic": "\nReprobate(karin, jeromy)\nLasso(karin, jeromy)\nAcquired(karin)\nOral(karin)\nVedic(karin)\nAnachronic(karin)\nMeridian(karin)\nWoolgather(karin, jeromy)\nReprobate(jeromy, karin)\nLasso(jeromy, karin)\nAcquired(jeromy)\nOral(jeromy)\nVedic(jeromy)\nAnachronic(jeromy)\nMeridian(jeromy)\nWoolgather(jeromy, karin)\nforall x (Acquired(x) and Woolgather(x, karin) -> Lasso(karin, jeromy))\nforall x (Vedic(x) -> Lasso(x, karin))\nforall x (Woolgather(x, jeromy) -> Acquired(jeromy))\nforall x (Vedic(x) and Woolgather(x, jeromy) -> Reprobate(x, jeromy))\nforall x (Oral(x) and Acquired(x) -> Woolgather(x, jeromy))\nforall x (Lasso(x, jeromy) and Woolgather(x, karin) -> Reprobate(x, jeromy))\n\nnot Reprobate(jeromy, jeromy)\n\nOral(jeromy) and Acquired(jeromy) and forall x (Oral(x) and Acquired(x) -> Woolgather(x, jeromy)) -> therefore Woolgather(jeromy, jeromy) Vedic(jeromy) and Woolgather(jeromy, jeromy) and forall x (Vedic(x) and Woolgather(x, jeromy) -> Reprobate(x, jeromy)) -> therefore Reprobate(jeromy, jeromy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The poul congest the abbott. The poul tear the abbott. The poul is grievous. The poul is jetting. The poul is dastardly. The poul is harmonized. The poul is unrhymed. The poul stomach the abbott. The abbott congest the poul. The abbott tear the poul. The abbott is grievous. The abbott is jetting. The abbott is dastardly. The abbott is harmonized. The abbott is unrhymed. The abbott stomach the poul. If someone is grievous and they see the poul then the poul tear the abbott. If someone is dastardly then they eat the poul. If someone stomach the abbott then the abbott is grievous. If someone is dastardly and they see the abbott then they chase the abbott. If someone is jetting and grievous then they see the abbott. If someone tear the abbott and they see the poul then they chase the abbott. The poul does not chase the poul.", "logic": "\nCongest(poul, abbott)\nTear(poul, abbott)\nGrievous(poul)\nJetting(poul)\nDastardly(poul)\nHarmonized(poul)\nUnrhymed(poul)\nStomach(poul, abbott)\nCongest(abbott, poul)\nTear(abbott, poul)\nGrievous(abbott)\nJetting(abbott)\nDastardly(abbott)\nHarmonized(abbott)\nUnrhymed(abbott)\nStomach(abbott, poul)\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Stomach(x, poul) -> Tear(poul, abbott))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Tear(x, poul))\nforall x (Stomach(x, abbott) -> Grievous(abbott))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) and Stomach(x, abbott) -> Congest(x, abbott))\nforall x (Jetting(x) and Grievous(x) -> Stomach(x, abbott))\nforall x (Tear(x, abbott) and Stomach(x, poul) -> Congest(x, abbott))\n\nnot Congest(poul, poul)\n\nnot Congest(poul, poul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The leanor aviate the roxi. The leanor enact the roxi. The leanor is asyndetic. The leanor is aldehydic. The leanor is uneager. The leanor is holophytic. The leanor is outlandish. The leanor peer the roxi. The roxi aviate the leanor. The roxi enact the leanor. The roxi is asyndetic. The roxi is aldehydic. The roxi is uneager. The roxi is holophytic. The roxi is outlandish. The roxi peer the leanor. If someone is asyndetic and they see the leanor then the leanor enact the roxi. If someone is uneager then they eat the leanor. If someone peer the roxi then the roxi is asyndetic. If someone is uneager and they see the roxi then they chase the roxi. If someone is aldehydic and asyndetic then they see the roxi. If someone enact the roxi and they see the leanor then they chase the roxi. The leanor peer the leanor.", "logic": "\nAviate(leanor, roxi)\nEnact(leanor, roxi)\nAsyndetic(leanor)\nAldehydic(leanor)\nUneager(leanor)\nHolophytic(leanor)\nOutlandish(leanor)\nPeer(leanor, roxi)\nAviate(roxi, leanor)\nEnact(roxi, leanor)\nAsyndetic(roxi)\nAldehydic(roxi)\nUneager(roxi)\nHolophytic(roxi)\nOutlandish(roxi)\nPeer(roxi, leanor)\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) and Peer(x, leanor) -> Enact(leanor, roxi))\nforall x (Uneager(x) -> Enact(x, leanor))\nforall x (Peer(x, roxi) -> Asyndetic(roxi))\nforall x (Uneager(x) and Peer(x, roxi) -> Aviate(x, roxi))\nforall x (Aldehydic(x) and Asyndetic(x) -> Peer(x, roxi))\nforall x (Enact(x, roxi) and Peer(x, leanor) -> Aviate(x, roxi))\n\nPeer(leanor, leanor)\n\nPeer(leanor, leanor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1141"} {"premises": "The sidoney is reposeful. If someone is sextuple and reposeful then they are yearly. Kind people are sextuple. The sidoney is reposeful.", "logic": "\nReposeful(sidoney)\nforall x (Sextuple(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Sextuple(x))\n\nReposeful(sidoney)\n\ntherefore Reposeful(sidoney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The mary is taiwanese. If someone is pensive and taiwanese then they are faustian. Kind people are pensive. The mary is not taiwanese.", "logic": "\nTaiwanese(mary)\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Taiwanese(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) -> Pensive(x))\n\nnot Taiwanese(mary)\n\ntherefore Taiwanese(mary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The shelbi is zymoid. If someone is amphibious and zymoid then they are funded. Kind people are amphibious. The shelbi is amphibious.", "logic": "\nZymoid(shelbi)\nforall x (Amphibious(x) and Zymoid(x) -> Funded(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Amphibious(x))\n\nAmphibious(shelbi)\n\nZymoid(shelbi) and forall x (Zymoid(x) -> Amphibious(x)) -> therefore Amphibious(shelbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The susie is tight. If someone is fine and tight then they are winglike. Kind people are fine. The susie is not fine.", "logic": "\nTight(susie)\nforall x (Fine(x) and Tight(x) -> Winglike(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Fine(x))\n\nnot Fine(susie)\n\nTight(susie) and forall x (Tight(x) -> Fine(x)) -> therefore Fine(susie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The hirsch is outre. If someone is lifelong and outre then they are numinous. Kind people are lifelong. The hirsch is numinous.", "logic": "\nOutre(hirsch)\nforall x (Lifelong(x) and Outre(x) -> Numinous(x))\nforall x (Outre(x) -> Lifelong(x))\n\nNuminous(hirsch)\n\nOutre(hirsch) and forall x (Outre(x) -> Lifelong(x)) -> therefore Lifelong(hirsch) Lifelong(hirsch) and Outre(hirsch) and forall x (Lifelong(x) and Outre(x) -> Numinous(x)) -> therefore Numinous(hirsch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The maddi is brunette. If someone is arced and brunette then they are frothy. Kind people are arced. The maddi is not frothy.", "logic": "\nBrunette(maddi)\nforall x (Arced(x) and Brunette(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Arced(x))\n\nnot Frothy(maddi)\n\nBrunette(maddi) and forall x (Brunette(x) -> Arced(x)) -> therefore Arced(maddi) Arced(maddi) and Brunette(maddi) and forall x (Arced(x) and Brunette(x) -> Frothy(x)) -> therefore Frothy(maddi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The brent is beloved. If someone is varying and beloved then they are placeable. Kind people are varying. The brent is not nice.", "logic": "\nBeloved(brent)\nforall x (Varying(x) and Beloved(x) -> Placeable(x))\nforall x (Beloved(x) -> Varying(x))\n\nnot Nice(brent)\n\nnot Nice(brent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The linnell is immune. If someone is unweaned and immune then they are doting. Kind people are unweaned. The linnell likes the linnell.", "logic": "\nImmune(linnell)\nforall x (Unweaned(x) and Immune(x) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Immune(x) -> Unweaned(x))\n\nLikes(linnell, linnell)\n\nLikes(linnell, linnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The wilek is driven. If someone is possessive and driven then they are offhand. Kind people are possessive. The wilek does not visit the wilek.", "logic": "\nDriven(wilek)\nforall x (Possessive(x) and Driven(x) -> Offhand(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) -> Possessive(x))\n\nnot Visits(wilek, wilek)\n\nnot Visits(wilek, wilek) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "The willa is coroneted. If someone is snowy and coroneted then they are unaddicted. Kind people are snowy. The willa chases the willa.", "logic": "\nCoroneted(willa)\nforall x (Snowy(x) and Coroneted(x) -> Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Coroneted(x) -> Snowy(x))\n\nChases(willa, willa)\n\nChases(willa, willa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-827"} {"premises": "Zoe is reasoned. Roseann is sanitary. Roseann is undeceived. Roseann is kafkaesque. Roselle is prongy. Roselle is undeceived. Roselle is reasoned. Roselle is leaden. Orsa is inshore. Orsa is undeceived. Orsa is kafkaesque. Orsa is leaden. If someone is sanitary and leaden then they are inshore. If Orsa is prongy then Orsa is sanitary. If someone is reasoned and inshore then they are undeceived. All sanitary, prongy people are inshore. All leaden people are kafkaesque. Kind people are leaden. All inshore, undeceived people are leaden. If Orsa is prongy and Orsa is inshore then Orsa is leaden. Roselle is undeceived.", "logic": "\nReasoned(zoe)\nSanitary(roseann)\nUndeceived(roseann)\nKafkaesque(roseann)\nProngy(roselle)\nUndeceived(roselle)\nReasoned(roselle)\nLeaden(roselle)\nInshore(orsa)\nUndeceived(orsa)\nKafkaesque(orsa)\nLeaden(orsa)\nforall x (Sanitary(x) and Leaden(x) -> Inshore(x))\nProngy(orsa) -> Sanitary(orsa)\nforall x (Reasoned(x) and Inshore(x) -> Undeceived(x))\nforall x (Sanitary(x) and Prongy(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Leaden(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nforall x (Undeceived(x) -> Leaden(x))\nforall x (Inshore(x) and Undeceived(x) -> Leaden(x))\nProngy(orsa) and Inshore(orsa) -> Leaden(orsa)\n\nUndeceived(roselle)\n\ntherefore Undeceived(roselle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Chev is sapphire. Florri is coalesced. Florri is plaintive. Florri is splintery. Madelena is petty. Madelena is plaintive. Madelena is sapphire. Madelena is tantric. Nealy is winsome. Nealy is plaintive. Nealy is splintery. Nealy is tantric. If someone is coalesced and tantric then they are winsome. If Nealy is petty then Nealy is coalesced. If someone is sapphire and winsome then they are plaintive. All coalesced, petty people are winsome. All tantric people are splintery. Kind people are tantric. All winsome, plaintive people are tantric. If Nealy is petty and Nealy is winsome then Nealy is tantric. Florri is not coalesced.", "logic": "\nSapphire(chev)\nCoalesced(florri)\nPlaintive(florri)\nSplintery(florri)\nPetty(madelena)\nPlaintive(madelena)\nSapphire(madelena)\nTantric(madelena)\nWinsome(nealy)\nPlaintive(nealy)\nSplintery(nealy)\nTantric(nealy)\nforall x (Coalesced(x) and Tantric(x) -> Winsome(x))\nPetty(nealy) -> Coalesced(nealy)\nforall x (Sapphire(x) and Winsome(x) -> Plaintive(x))\nforall x (Coalesced(x) and Petty(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Tantric(x) -> Splintery(x))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) -> Tantric(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Plaintive(x) -> Tantric(x))\nPetty(nealy) and Winsome(nealy) -> Tantric(nealy)\n\nnot Coalesced(florri)\n\ntherefore Coalesced(florri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Elwood is preanal. Sheri is fogged. Sheri is spacial. Sheri is meager. Collin is cryptical. Collin is spacial. Collin is preanal. Collin is unironed. Karissa is elfish. Karissa is spacial. Karissa is meager. Karissa is unironed. If someone is fogged and unironed then they are elfish. If Karissa is cryptical then Karissa is fogged. If someone is preanal and elfish then they are spacial. All fogged, cryptical people are elfish. All unironed people are meager. Kind people are unironed. All elfish, spacial people are unironed. If Karissa is cryptical and Karissa is elfish then Karissa is unironed. Sheri is unironed.", "logic": "\nPreanal(elwood)\nFogged(sheri)\nSpacial(sheri)\nMeager(sheri)\nCryptical(collin)\nSpacial(collin)\nPreanal(collin)\nUnironed(collin)\nElfish(karissa)\nSpacial(karissa)\nMeager(karissa)\nUnironed(karissa)\nforall x (Fogged(x) and Unironed(x) -> Elfish(x))\nCryptical(karissa) -> Fogged(karissa)\nforall x (Preanal(x) and Elfish(x) -> Spacial(x))\nforall x (Fogged(x) and Cryptical(x) -> Elfish(x))\nforall x (Unironed(x) -> Meager(x))\nforall x (Spacial(x) -> Unironed(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) and Spacial(x) -> Unironed(x))\nCryptical(karissa) and Elfish(karissa) -> Unironed(karissa)\n\nUnironed(sheri)\n\nSpacial(sheri) and forall x (Spacial(x) -> Unironed(x)) -> therefore Unironed(sheri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Jewelle is coreferent. Selle is unswayed. Selle is malawian. Selle is unrivalled. Warde is calyptrate. Warde is malawian. Warde is coreferent. Warde is unlighted. Trudy is unfed. Trudy is malawian. Trudy is unrivalled. Trudy is unlighted. If someone is unswayed and unlighted then they are unfed. If Trudy is calyptrate then Trudy is unswayed. If someone is coreferent and unfed then they are malawian. All unswayed, calyptrate people are unfed. All unlighted people are unrivalled. Kind people are unlighted. All unfed, malawian people are unlighted. If Trudy is calyptrate and Trudy is unfed then Trudy is unlighted. Warde is not unrivalled.", "logic": "\nCoreferent(jewelle)\nUnswayed(selle)\nMalawian(selle)\nUnrivalled(selle)\nCalyptrate(warde)\nMalawian(warde)\nCoreferent(warde)\nUnlighted(warde)\nUnfed(trudy)\nMalawian(trudy)\nUnrivalled(trudy)\nUnlighted(trudy)\nforall x (Unswayed(x) and Unlighted(x) -> Unfed(x))\nCalyptrate(trudy) -> Unswayed(trudy)\nforall x (Coreferent(x) and Unfed(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Unswayed(x) and Calyptrate(x) -> Unfed(x))\nforall x (Unlighted(x) -> Unrivalled(x))\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Unlighted(x))\nforall x (Unfed(x) and Malawian(x) -> Unlighted(x))\nCalyptrate(trudy) and Unfed(trudy) -> Unlighted(trudy)\n\nnot Unrivalled(warde)\n\nUnlighted(warde) and forall x (Unlighted(x) -> Unrivalled(x)) -> therefore Unrivalled(warde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Ardella is cantering. Lorenza is fictile. Lorenza is tantric. Lorenza is sovereign. Gwenora is trigonal. Gwenora is tantric. Gwenora is cantering. Gwenora is irruptive. Garvy is rutted. Garvy is tantric. Garvy is sovereign. Garvy is irruptive. If someone is fictile and irruptive then they are rutted. If Garvy is trigonal then Garvy is fictile. If someone is cantering and rutted then they are tantric. All fictile, trigonal people are rutted. All irruptive people are sovereign. Kind people are irruptive. All rutted, tantric people are irruptive. If Garvy is trigonal and Garvy is rutted then Garvy is irruptive. Lorenza is rutted.", "logic": "\nCantering(ardella)\nFictile(lorenza)\nTantric(lorenza)\nSovereign(lorenza)\nTrigonal(gwenora)\nTantric(gwenora)\nCantering(gwenora)\nIrruptive(gwenora)\nRutted(garvy)\nTantric(garvy)\nSovereign(garvy)\nIrruptive(garvy)\nforall x (Fictile(x) and Irruptive(x) -> Rutted(x))\nTrigonal(garvy) -> Fictile(garvy)\nforall x (Cantering(x) and Rutted(x) -> Tantric(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) and Trigonal(x) -> Rutted(x))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Tantric(x) -> Irruptive(x))\nforall x (Rutted(x) and Tantric(x) -> Irruptive(x))\nTrigonal(garvy) and Rutted(garvy) -> Irruptive(garvy)\n\nRutted(lorenza)\n\nTantric(lorenza) and forall x (Tantric(x) -> Irruptive(x)) -> therefore Irruptive(lorenza) Fictile(lorenza) and Irruptive(lorenza) and forall x (Fictile(x) and Irruptive(x) -> Rutted(x)) -> therefore Rutted(lorenza)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Esau is glorious. Garrot is hollow. Garrot is ergodic. Garrot is violet. Davina is grooved. Davina is ergodic. Davina is glorious. Davina is untucked. Waylon is humpbacked. Waylon is ergodic. Waylon is violet. Waylon is untucked. If someone is hollow and untucked then they are humpbacked. If Waylon is grooved then Waylon is hollow. If someone is glorious and humpbacked then they are ergodic. All hollow, grooved people are humpbacked. All untucked people are violet. Kind people are untucked. All humpbacked, ergodic people are untucked. If Waylon is grooved and Waylon is humpbacked then Waylon is untucked. Garrot is not humpbacked.", "logic": "\nGlorious(esau)\nHollow(garrot)\nErgodic(garrot)\nViolet(garrot)\nGrooved(davina)\nErgodic(davina)\nGlorious(davina)\nUntucked(davina)\nHumpbacked(waylon)\nErgodic(waylon)\nViolet(waylon)\nUntucked(waylon)\nforall x (Hollow(x) and Untucked(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nGrooved(waylon) -> Hollow(waylon)\nforall x (Glorious(x) and Humpbacked(x) -> Ergodic(x))\nforall x (Hollow(x) and Grooved(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Untucked(x) -> Violet(x))\nforall x (Ergodic(x) -> Untucked(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) and Ergodic(x) -> Untucked(x))\nGrooved(waylon) and Humpbacked(waylon) -> Untucked(waylon)\n\nnot Humpbacked(garrot)\n\nErgodic(garrot) and forall x (Ergodic(x) -> Untucked(x)) -> therefore Untucked(garrot) Hollow(garrot) and Untucked(garrot) and forall x (Hollow(x) and Untucked(x) -> Humpbacked(x)) -> therefore Humpbacked(garrot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Pearce is ablated. Harvey is misguided. Harvey is undecided. Harvey is straplike. Allie is contrabass. Allie is undecided. Allie is ablated. Allie is advisory. Tera is careful. Tera is undecided. Tera is straplike. Tera is advisory. If someone is misguided and advisory then they are careful. If Tera is contrabass then Tera is misguided. If someone is ablated and careful then they are undecided. All misguided, contrabass people are careful. All advisory people are straplike. Kind people are advisory. All careful, undecided people are advisory. If Tera is contrabass and Tera is careful then Tera is advisory. Tera is not misguided.", "logic": "\nAblated(pearce)\nMisguided(harvey)\nUndecided(harvey)\nStraplike(harvey)\nContrabass(allie)\nUndecided(allie)\nAblated(allie)\nAdvisory(allie)\nCareful(tera)\nUndecided(tera)\nStraplike(tera)\nAdvisory(tera)\nforall x (Misguided(x) and Advisory(x) -> Careful(x))\nContrabass(tera) -> Misguided(tera)\nforall x (Ablated(x) and Careful(x) -> Undecided(x))\nforall x (Misguided(x) and Contrabass(x) -> Careful(x))\nforall x (Advisory(x) -> Straplike(x))\nforall x (Undecided(x) -> Advisory(x))\nforall x (Careful(x) and Undecided(x) -> Advisory(x))\nContrabass(tera) and Careful(tera) -> Advisory(tera)\n\nnot Misguided(tera)\n\nContrabass(tera) -> Misguided(tera) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Friedric is setose. Brit is kafkaesque. Brit is overhanded. Brit is unabated. Roth is coalesced. Roth is overhanded. Roth is setose. Roth is drained. Heddie is burundian. Heddie is overhanded. Heddie is unabated. Heddie is drained. If someone is kafkaesque and drained then they are burundian. If Heddie is coalesced then Heddie is kafkaesque. If someone is setose and burundian then they are overhanded. All kafkaesque, coalesced people are burundian. All drained people are unabated. Kind people are drained. All burundian, overhanded people are drained. If Heddie is coalesced and Heddie is burundian then Heddie is drained. Friedric is unabated.", "logic": "\nSetose(friedric)\nKafkaesque(brit)\nOverhanded(brit)\nUnabated(brit)\nCoalesced(roth)\nOverhanded(roth)\nSetose(roth)\nDrained(roth)\nBurundian(heddie)\nOverhanded(heddie)\nUnabated(heddie)\nDrained(heddie)\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) and Drained(x) -> Burundian(x))\nCoalesced(heddie) -> Kafkaesque(heddie)\nforall x (Setose(x) and Burundian(x) -> Overhanded(x))\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) and Coalesced(x) -> Burundian(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Overhanded(x) -> Drained(x))\nforall x (Burundian(x) and Overhanded(x) -> Drained(x))\nCoalesced(heddie) and Burundian(heddie) -> Drained(heddie)\n\nUnabated(friedric)\n\nforall x (Drained(x) -> Unabated(x)) <- forall x (Overhanded(x) -> Drained(x)) <- forall x (Setose(x) and Burundian(x) -> Overhanded(x)) <- forall x (Kafkaesque(x) and Drained(x) -> Burundian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Josie is nonnomadic. Shurwood is trussed. Shurwood is homebound. Shurwood is sensory. Clareta is unfed. Clareta is homebound. Clareta is nonnomadic. Clareta is aspheric. Mirella is insolvable. Mirella is homebound. Mirella is sensory. Mirella is aspheric. If someone is trussed and aspheric then they are insolvable. If Mirella is unfed then Mirella is trussed. If someone is nonnomadic and insolvable then they are homebound. All trussed, unfed people are insolvable. All aspheric people are sensory. Kind people are aspheric. All insolvable, homebound people are aspheric. If Mirella is unfed and Mirella is insolvable then Mirella is aspheric. Josie is not aspheric.", "logic": "\nNonnomadic(josie)\nTrussed(shurwood)\nHomebound(shurwood)\nSensory(shurwood)\nUnfed(clareta)\nHomebound(clareta)\nNonnomadic(clareta)\nAspheric(clareta)\nInsolvable(mirella)\nHomebound(mirella)\nSensory(mirella)\nAspheric(mirella)\nforall x (Trussed(x) and Aspheric(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nUnfed(mirella) -> Trussed(mirella)\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) and Insolvable(x) -> Homebound(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) and Unfed(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> Sensory(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Homebound(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nUnfed(mirella) and Insolvable(mirella) -> Aspheric(mirella)\n\nnot Aspheric(josie)\n\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Aspheric(x)) <- forall x (Nonnomadic(x) and Insolvable(x) -> Homebound(x)) <- forall x (Trussed(x) and Aspheric(x) -> Insolvable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Normie is greek. Leif is lumbar. Leif is backstage. Leif is retroflex. Rex is andean. Rex is backstage. Rex is greek. Rex is gooselike. Pascal is semantic. Pascal is backstage. Pascal is retroflex. Pascal is gooselike. If someone is lumbar and gooselike then they are semantic. If Pascal is andean then Pascal is lumbar. If someone is greek and semantic then they are backstage. All lumbar, andean people are semantic. All gooselike people are retroflex. Kind people are gooselike. All semantic, backstage people are gooselike. If Pascal is andean and Pascal is semantic then Pascal is gooselike. Pascal is greek.", "logic": "\nGreek(normie)\nLumbar(leif)\nBackstage(leif)\nRetroflex(leif)\nAndean(rex)\nBackstage(rex)\nGreek(rex)\nGooselike(rex)\nSemantic(pascal)\nBackstage(pascal)\nRetroflex(pascal)\nGooselike(pascal)\nforall x (Lumbar(x) and Gooselike(x) -> Semantic(x))\nAndean(pascal) -> Lumbar(pascal)\nforall x (Greek(x) and Semantic(x) -> Backstage(x))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) and Andean(x) -> Semantic(x))\nforall x (Gooselike(x) -> Retroflex(x))\nforall x (Backstage(x) -> Gooselike(x))\nforall x (Semantic(x) and Backstage(x) -> Gooselike(x))\nAndean(pascal) and Semantic(pascal) -> Gooselike(pascal)\n\nGreek(pascal)\n\nGreek(pascal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Janith is knitted. Willem is tanzanian. Willem is commanding. Willem is tibial. Janine is intrinsic. Janine is commanding. Janine is knitted. Janine is windy. Pen is areolate. Pen is commanding. Pen is tibial. Pen is windy. If someone is tanzanian and windy then they are areolate. If Pen is intrinsic then Pen is tanzanian. If someone is knitted and areolate then they are commanding. All tanzanian, intrinsic people are areolate. All windy people are tibial. Kind people are windy. All areolate, commanding people are windy. If Pen is intrinsic and Pen is areolate then Pen is windy. Pen is not intrinsic.", "logic": "\nKnitted(janith)\nTanzanian(willem)\nCommanding(willem)\nTibial(willem)\nIntrinsic(janine)\nCommanding(janine)\nKnitted(janine)\nWindy(janine)\nAreolate(pen)\nCommanding(pen)\nTibial(pen)\nWindy(pen)\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) and Windy(x) -> Areolate(x))\nIntrinsic(pen) -> Tanzanian(pen)\nforall x (Knitted(x) and Areolate(x) -> Commanding(x))\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) and Intrinsic(x) -> Areolate(x))\nforall x (Windy(x) -> Tibial(x))\nforall x (Commanding(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Areolate(x) and Commanding(x) -> Windy(x))\nIntrinsic(pen) and Areolate(pen) -> Windy(pen)\n\nnot Intrinsic(pen)\n\nnot Intrinsic(pen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Gloriane is reverend. Lemar is telescopic. Lemar is flexible. Lemar is illusional. Nathanil is near. Nathanil is flexible. Nathanil is reverend. Nathanil is exhaustive. Jacynth is unlucky. Jacynth is flexible. Jacynth is illusional. Jacynth is exhaustive. If someone is telescopic and exhaustive then they are unlucky. If Jacynth is near then Jacynth is telescopic. If someone is reverend and unlucky then they are flexible. All telescopic, near people are unlucky. All exhaustive people are illusional. Kind people are exhaustive. All unlucky, flexible people are exhaustive. If Jacynth is near and Jacynth is unlucky then Jacynth is exhaustive. Nathanil is telescopic.", "logic": "\nReverend(gloriane)\nTelescopic(lemar)\nFlexible(lemar)\nIllusional(lemar)\nNear(nathanil)\nFlexible(nathanil)\nReverend(nathanil)\nExhaustive(nathanil)\nUnlucky(jacynth)\nFlexible(jacynth)\nIllusional(jacynth)\nExhaustive(jacynth)\nforall x (Telescopic(x) and Exhaustive(x) -> Unlucky(x))\nNear(jacynth) -> Telescopic(jacynth)\nforall x (Reverend(x) and Unlucky(x) -> Flexible(x))\nforall x (Telescopic(x) and Near(x) -> Unlucky(x))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Flexible(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\nforall x (Unlucky(x) and Flexible(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\nNear(jacynth) and Unlucky(jacynth) -> Exhaustive(jacynth)\n\nTelescopic(nathanil)\n\nTelescopic(nathanil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "Wilbur is enjoyable. Wilbur is autonomous. Wilbur is insincere. Wilbur is needful. Wilbur is untethered. Laurene is cellular. Laurene is enjoyable. Louie is enjoyable. Louie is insincere. Louie is honey. Tarra is autonomous. Tarra is not honey. If Laurene is insincere then Laurene is cellular. If someone is honey and needful then they are cellular. All untethered, honey people are cellular. All autonomous, enjoyable people are untethered. If someone is insincere and not honey then they are not untethered. All enjoyable people are untethered. If someone is untethered and not needful then they are enjoyable. Round, enjoyable people are autonomous. Wilbur is insincere.", "logic": "\nEnjoyable(wilbur)\nAutonomous(wilbur)\nInsincere(wilbur)\nNeedful(wilbur)\nUntethered(wilbur)\nCellular(laurene)\nEnjoyable(laurene)\nEnjoyable(louie)\nInsincere(louie)\nHoney(louie)\nAutonomous(tarra)\nnot Honey(tarra)\nInsincere(laurene) -> Cellular(laurene)\nforall x (Honey(x) and Needful(x) -> Cellular(x))\nforall x (Untethered(x) and Honey(x) -> Cellular(x))\nforall x (Autonomous(x) and Enjoyable(x) -> Untethered(x))\nforall x (Insincere(x) and not Honey(x) -> not Untethered(x))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) -> Untethered(x))\nforall x (Untethered(x) and not Needful(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\nforall x (Needful(x) and Enjoyable(x) -> Autonomous(x))\n\nInsincere(wilbur)\n\ntherefore Insincere(wilbur)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Barbee is unrelaxed. Barbee is vicinal. Barbee is fahrenheit. Barbee is underwater. Barbee is isomorphic. Weslie is redolent. Weslie is unrelaxed. Kermie is unrelaxed. Kermie is fahrenheit. Kermie is appressed. Shirlene is vicinal. Shirlene is not appressed. If Weslie is fahrenheit then Weslie is redolent. If someone is appressed and underwater then they are redolent. All isomorphic, appressed people are redolent. All vicinal, unrelaxed people are isomorphic. If someone is fahrenheit and not appressed then they are not isomorphic. All unrelaxed people are isomorphic. If someone is isomorphic and not underwater then they are unrelaxed. Round, unrelaxed people are vicinal. Weslie is not redolent.", "logic": "\nUnrelaxed(barbee)\nVicinal(barbee)\nFahrenheit(barbee)\nUnderwater(barbee)\nIsomorphic(barbee)\nRedolent(weslie)\nUnrelaxed(weslie)\nUnrelaxed(kermie)\nFahrenheit(kermie)\nAppressed(kermie)\nVicinal(shirlene)\nnot Appressed(shirlene)\nFahrenheit(weslie) -> Redolent(weslie)\nforall x (Appressed(x) and Underwater(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) and Appressed(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Vicinal(x) and Unrelaxed(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Fahrenheit(x) and not Appressed(x) -> not Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) and not Underwater(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Underwater(x) and Unrelaxed(x) -> Vicinal(x))\n\nnot Redolent(weslie)\n\ntherefore Redolent(weslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Fey is stifling. Fey is zoophagous. Fey is statant. Fey is marketable. Fey is eviscerate. Bobette is soundproof. Bobette is stifling. Oscar is stifling. Oscar is statant. Oscar is nosey. Hobart is zoophagous. Hobart is not nosey. If Bobette is statant then Bobette is soundproof. If someone is nosey and marketable then they are soundproof. All eviscerate, nosey people are soundproof. All zoophagous, stifling people are eviscerate. If someone is statant and not nosey then they are not eviscerate. All stifling people are eviscerate. If someone is eviscerate and not marketable then they are stifling. Round, stifling people are zoophagous. Oscar is eviscerate.", "logic": "\nStifling(fey)\nZoophagous(fey)\nStatant(fey)\nMarketable(fey)\nEviscerate(fey)\nSoundproof(bobette)\nStifling(bobette)\nStifling(oscar)\nStatant(oscar)\nNosey(oscar)\nZoophagous(hobart)\nnot Nosey(hobart)\nStatant(bobette) -> Soundproof(bobette)\nforall x (Nosey(x) and Marketable(x) -> Soundproof(x))\nforall x (Eviscerate(x) and Nosey(x) -> Soundproof(x))\nforall x (Zoophagous(x) and Stifling(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\nforall x (Statant(x) and not Nosey(x) -> not Eviscerate(x))\nforall x (Stifling(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\nforall x (Eviscerate(x) and not Marketable(x) -> Stifling(x))\nforall x (Marketable(x) and Stifling(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\n\nEviscerate(oscar)\n\nStifling(oscar) and forall x (Stifling(x) -> Eviscerate(x)) -> therefore Eviscerate(oscar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Charil is subjugated. Charil is earthy. Charil is tasteless. Charil is ammino. Charil is mucose. Nikkie is musical. Nikkie is subjugated. Carlos is subjugated. Carlos is tasteless. Carlos is civilised. Kayle is earthy. Kayle is not civilised. If Nikkie is tasteless then Nikkie is musical. If someone is civilised and ammino then they are musical. All mucose, civilised people are musical. All earthy, subjugated people are mucose. If someone is tasteless and not civilised then they are not mucose. All subjugated people are mucose. If someone is mucose and not ammino then they are subjugated. Round, subjugated people are earthy. Carlos is not mucose.", "logic": "\nSubjugated(charil)\nEarthy(charil)\nTasteless(charil)\nAmmino(charil)\nMucose(charil)\nMusical(nikkie)\nSubjugated(nikkie)\nSubjugated(carlos)\nTasteless(carlos)\nCivilised(carlos)\nEarthy(kayle)\nnot Civilised(kayle)\nTasteless(nikkie) -> Musical(nikkie)\nforall x (Civilised(x) and Ammino(x) -> Musical(x))\nforall x (Mucose(x) and Civilised(x) -> Musical(x))\nforall x (Earthy(x) and Subjugated(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Tasteless(x) and not Civilised(x) -> not Mucose(x))\nforall x (Subjugated(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Mucose(x) and not Ammino(x) -> Subjugated(x))\nforall x (Ammino(x) and Subjugated(x) -> Earthy(x))\n\nnot Mucose(carlos)\n\nSubjugated(carlos) and forall x (Subjugated(x) -> Mucose(x)) -> therefore Mucose(carlos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Alica is crowned. Alica is hedged. Alica is untied. Alica is equal. Alica is ridged. Cristen is exacting. Cristen is crowned. Maxy is crowned. Maxy is untied. Maxy is retentive. Kyla is hedged. Kyla is not retentive. If Cristen is untied then Cristen is exacting. If someone is retentive and equal then they are exacting. All ridged, retentive people are exacting. All hedged, crowned people are ridged. If someone is untied and not retentive then they are not ridged. All crowned people are ridged. If someone is ridged and not equal then they are crowned. Round, crowned people are hedged. Maxy is exacting.", "logic": "\nCrowned(alica)\nHedged(alica)\nUntied(alica)\nEqual(alica)\nRidged(alica)\nExacting(cristen)\nCrowned(cristen)\nCrowned(maxy)\nUntied(maxy)\nRetentive(maxy)\nHedged(kyla)\nnot Retentive(kyla)\nUntied(cristen) -> Exacting(cristen)\nforall x (Retentive(x) and Equal(x) -> Exacting(x))\nforall x (Ridged(x) and Retentive(x) -> Exacting(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Crowned(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Untied(x) and not Retentive(x) -> not Ridged(x))\nforall x (Crowned(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Ridged(x) and not Equal(x) -> Crowned(x))\nforall x (Equal(x) and Crowned(x) -> Hedged(x))\n\nExacting(maxy)\n\nCrowned(maxy) and forall x (Crowned(x) -> Ridged(x)) -> therefore Ridged(maxy) Ridged(maxy) and Retentive(maxy) and forall x (Ridged(x) and Retentive(x) -> Exacting(x)) -> therefore Exacting(maxy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Meriel is papillary. Meriel is azimuthal. Meriel is baneful. Meriel is nonvisual. Meriel is cometic. Martina is discrete. Martina is papillary. Bret is papillary. Bret is baneful. Bret is nonstick. Daniella is azimuthal. Daniella is not nonstick. If Martina is baneful then Martina is discrete. If someone is nonstick and nonvisual then they are discrete. All cometic, nonstick people are discrete. All azimuthal, papillary people are cometic. If someone is baneful and not nonstick then they are not cometic. All papillary people are cometic. If someone is cometic and not nonvisual then they are papillary. Round, papillary people are azimuthal. Bret is not discrete.", "logic": "\nPapillary(meriel)\nAzimuthal(meriel)\nBaneful(meriel)\nNonvisual(meriel)\nCometic(meriel)\nDiscrete(martina)\nPapillary(martina)\nPapillary(bret)\nBaneful(bret)\nNonstick(bret)\nAzimuthal(daniella)\nnot Nonstick(daniella)\nBaneful(martina) -> Discrete(martina)\nforall x (Nonstick(x) and Nonvisual(x) -> Discrete(x))\nforall x (Cometic(x) and Nonstick(x) -> Discrete(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and Papillary(x) -> Cometic(x))\nforall x (Baneful(x) and not Nonstick(x) -> not Cometic(x))\nforall x (Papillary(x) -> Cometic(x))\nforall x (Cometic(x) and not Nonvisual(x) -> Papillary(x))\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) and Papillary(x) -> Azimuthal(x))\n\nnot Discrete(bret)\n\nPapillary(bret) and forall x (Papillary(x) -> Cometic(x)) -> therefore Cometic(bret) Cometic(bret) and Nonstick(bret) and forall x (Cometic(x) and Nonstick(x) -> Discrete(x)) -> therefore Discrete(bret)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Vijay is fatless. Vijay is cannibalic. Vijay is nonthermal. Vijay is sevenfold. Vijay is invidious. Mignon is brawny. Mignon is fatless. Gwyneth is fatless. Gwyneth is nonthermal. Gwyneth is nilpotent. Virgil is cannibalic. Virgil is not nilpotent. If Mignon is nonthermal then Mignon is brawny. If someone is nilpotent and sevenfold then they are brawny. All invidious, nilpotent people are brawny. All cannibalic, fatless people are invidious. If someone is nonthermal and not nilpotent then they are not invidious. All fatless people are invidious. If someone is invidious and not sevenfold then they are fatless. Round, fatless people are cannibalic. Vijay is not brawny.", "logic": "\nFatless(vijay)\nCannibalic(vijay)\nNonthermal(vijay)\nSevenfold(vijay)\nInvidious(vijay)\nBrawny(mignon)\nFatless(mignon)\nFatless(gwyneth)\nNonthermal(gwyneth)\nNilpotent(gwyneth)\nCannibalic(virgil)\nnot Nilpotent(virgil)\nNonthermal(mignon) -> Brawny(mignon)\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) and Sevenfold(x) -> Brawny(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Nilpotent(x) -> Brawny(x))\nforall x (Cannibalic(x) and Fatless(x) -> Invidious(x))\nforall x (Nonthermal(x) and not Nilpotent(x) -> not Invidious(x))\nforall x (Fatless(x) -> Invidious(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) and not Sevenfold(x) -> Fatless(x))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) and Fatless(x) -> Cannibalic(x))\n\nnot Brawny(vijay)\n\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) and Sevenfold(x) -> Brawny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Thaine is scoured. Thaine is scheming. Thaine is bungling. Thaine is metastable. Thaine is agonistic. Carlye is depletable. Carlye is scoured. Marcelle is scoured. Marcelle is bungling. Marcelle is futurist. Sharyl is scheming. Sharyl is not futurist. If Carlye is bungling then Carlye is depletable. If someone is futurist and metastable then they are depletable. All agonistic, futurist people are depletable. All scheming, scoured people are agonistic. If someone is bungling and not futurist then they are not agonistic. All scoured people are agonistic. If someone is agonistic and not metastable then they are scoured. Round, scoured people are scheming. Marcelle is scheming.", "logic": "\nScoured(thaine)\nScheming(thaine)\nBungling(thaine)\nMetastable(thaine)\nAgonistic(thaine)\nDepletable(carlye)\nScoured(carlye)\nScoured(marcelle)\nBungling(marcelle)\nFuturist(marcelle)\nScheming(sharyl)\nnot Futurist(sharyl)\nBungling(carlye) -> Depletable(carlye)\nforall x (Futurist(x) and Metastable(x) -> Depletable(x))\nforall x (Agonistic(x) and Futurist(x) -> Depletable(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) and Scoured(x) -> Agonistic(x))\nforall x (Bungling(x) and not Futurist(x) -> not Agonistic(x))\nforall x (Scoured(x) -> Agonistic(x))\nforall x (Agonistic(x) and not Metastable(x) -> Scoured(x))\nforall x (Metastable(x) and Scoured(x) -> Scheming(x))\n\nScheming(marcelle)\n\nforall x (Metastable(x) and Scoured(x) -> Scheming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Audrye is danish. Audrye is liveried. Audrye is goofy. Audrye is brief. Audrye is agrarian. Prent is segmented. Prent is danish. Amelia is danish. Amelia is goofy. Amelia is facial. Obadiah is liveried. Obadiah is not facial. If Prent is goofy then Prent is segmented. If someone is facial and brief then they are segmented. All agrarian, facial people are segmented. All liveried, danish people are agrarian. If someone is goofy and not facial then they are not agrarian. All danish people are agrarian. If someone is agrarian and not brief then they are danish. Round, danish people are liveried. Obadiah is not agrarian.", "logic": "\nDanish(audrye)\nLiveried(audrye)\nGoofy(audrye)\nBrief(audrye)\nAgrarian(audrye)\nSegmented(prent)\nDanish(prent)\nDanish(amelia)\nGoofy(amelia)\nFacial(amelia)\nLiveried(obadiah)\nnot Facial(obadiah)\nGoofy(prent) -> Segmented(prent)\nforall x (Facial(x) and Brief(x) -> Segmented(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) and Facial(x) -> Segmented(x))\nforall x (Liveried(x) and Danish(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Goofy(x) and not Facial(x) -> not Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Danish(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) and not Brief(x) -> Danish(x))\nforall x (Brief(x) and Danish(x) -> Liveried(x))\n\nnot Agrarian(obadiah)\n\nforall x (Liveried(x) and Danish(x) -> Agrarian(x)) <- forall x (Agrarian(x) and not Brief(x) -> Danish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Bari is homologous. Bari is ecuadorian. Bari is adverse. Bari is killable. Bari is bursiform. Alden is voltaic. Alden is homologous. Carmen is homologous. Carmen is adverse. Carmen is rupestral. Loretta is ecuadorian. Loretta is not rupestral. If Alden is adverse then Alden is voltaic. If someone is rupestral and killable then they are voltaic. All bursiform, rupestral people are voltaic. All ecuadorian, homologous people are bursiform. If someone is adverse and not rupestral then they are not bursiform. All homologous people are bursiform. If someone is bursiform and not killable then they are homologous. Round, homologous people are ecuadorian. Loretta is adverse.", "logic": "\nHomologous(bari)\nEcuadorian(bari)\nAdverse(bari)\nKillable(bari)\nBursiform(bari)\nVoltaic(alden)\nHomologous(alden)\nHomologous(carmen)\nAdverse(carmen)\nRupestral(carmen)\nEcuadorian(loretta)\nnot Rupestral(loretta)\nAdverse(alden) -> Voltaic(alden)\nforall x (Rupestral(x) and Killable(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Bursiform(x) and Rupestral(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Ecuadorian(x) and Homologous(x) -> Bursiform(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) and not Rupestral(x) -> not Bursiform(x))\nforall x (Homologous(x) -> Bursiform(x))\nforall x (Bursiform(x) and not Killable(x) -> Homologous(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) and Homologous(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\n\nAdverse(loretta)\n\nAdverse(loretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Lilias is metallic. Lilias is shuddering. Lilias is effusive. Lilias is cobwebby. Lilias is doctoral. Kylila is unimpeded. Kylila is metallic. Theodore is metallic. Theodore is effusive. Theodore is apposite. Hermione is shuddering. Hermione is not apposite. If Kylila is effusive then Kylila is unimpeded. If someone is apposite and cobwebby then they are unimpeded. All doctoral, apposite people are unimpeded. All shuddering, metallic people are doctoral. If someone is effusive and not apposite then they are not doctoral. All metallic people are doctoral. If someone is doctoral and not cobwebby then they are metallic. Round, metallic people are shuddering. Hermione is not cobwebby.", "logic": "\nMetallic(lilias)\nShuddering(lilias)\nEffusive(lilias)\nCobwebby(lilias)\nDoctoral(lilias)\nUnimpeded(kylila)\nMetallic(kylila)\nMetallic(theodore)\nEffusive(theodore)\nApposite(theodore)\nShuddering(hermione)\nnot Apposite(hermione)\nEffusive(kylila) -> Unimpeded(kylila)\nforall x (Apposite(x) and Cobwebby(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nforall x (Doctoral(x) and Apposite(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nforall x (Shuddering(x) and Metallic(x) -> Doctoral(x))\nforall x (Effusive(x) and not Apposite(x) -> not Doctoral(x))\nforall x (Metallic(x) -> Doctoral(x))\nforall x (Doctoral(x) and not Cobwebby(x) -> Metallic(x))\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) and Metallic(x) -> Shuddering(x))\n\nnot Cobwebby(hermione)\n\nnot Cobwebby(hermione) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Valenka is apogamic. Valenka is pectic. Valenka is hymeneal. Valenka is acuminate. Valenka is softheaded. Dolorita is bigoted. Dolorita is apogamic. Zora is apogamic. Zora is hymeneal. Zora is adsorbate. Taylor is pectic. Taylor is not adsorbate. If Dolorita is hymeneal then Dolorita is bigoted. If someone is adsorbate and acuminate then they are bigoted. All softheaded, adsorbate people are bigoted. All pectic, apogamic people are softheaded. If someone is hymeneal and not adsorbate then they are not softheaded. All apogamic people are softheaded. If someone is softheaded and not acuminate then they are apogamic. Round, apogamic people are pectic. Zora is acuminate.", "logic": "\nApogamic(valenka)\nPectic(valenka)\nHymeneal(valenka)\nAcuminate(valenka)\nSoftheaded(valenka)\nBigoted(dolorita)\nApogamic(dolorita)\nApogamic(zora)\nHymeneal(zora)\nAdsorbate(zora)\nPectic(taylor)\nnot Adsorbate(taylor)\nHymeneal(dolorita) -> Bigoted(dolorita)\nforall x (Adsorbate(x) and Acuminate(x) -> Bigoted(x))\nforall x (Softheaded(x) and Adsorbate(x) -> Bigoted(x))\nforall x (Pectic(x) and Apogamic(x) -> Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Hymeneal(x) and not Adsorbate(x) -> not Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Apogamic(x) -> Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Softheaded(x) and not Acuminate(x) -> Apogamic(x))\nforall x (Acuminate(x) and Apogamic(x) -> Pectic(x))\n\nAcuminate(zora)\n\nAcuminate(zora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1057"} {"premises": "Kimberlee is disdainful. Kimberlee is backstage. Kimberlee is caitiff. Kimberlee is not igneous. Maxwell is aglitter. Vail is backstage. Vail is igneous. If something is aglitter then it is backstage. All igneous, caitiff things are backstage. If something is guatemalan and not disdainful then it is not backstage. If something is improved then it is not backstage. If something is improved then it is not igneous. If something is backstage and aglitter then it is not igneous. If Vail is not guatemalan then Vail is aglitter. If something is backstage then it is not improved. Kimberlee is disdainful.", "logic": "\nDisdainful(kimberlee)\nBackstage(kimberlee)\nCaitiff(kimberlee)\nnot Igneous(kimberlee)\nAglitter(maxwell)\nBackstage(vail)\nIgneous(vail)\nforall x (Aglitter(x) -> Backstage(x))\nforall x (Igneous(x) and Caitiff(x) -> Backstage(x))\nforall x (Guatemalan(x) and not Disdainful(x) -> not Backstage(x))\nforall x (Improved(x) -> not Backstage(x))\nforall x (Improved(x) -> not Igneous(x))\nforall x (Backstage(x) and Aglitter(x) -> not Igneous(x))\nnot Guatemalan(vail) -> Aglitter(vail)\nforall x (Backstage(x) -> not Improved(x))\n\nDisdainful(kimberlee)\n\ntherefore Disdainful(kimberlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Langston is sometime. Langston is scurrilous. Langston is sylphlike. Langston is not wartlike. Eldon is allantoic. Sarina is scurrilous. Sarina is wartlike. If something is allantoic then it is scurrilous. All wartlike, sylphlike things are scurrilous. If something is plumping and not sometime then it is not scurrilous. If something is bantering then it is not scurrilous. If something is bantering then it is not wartlike. If something is scurrilous and allantoic then it is not wartlike. If Sarina is not plumping then Sarina is allantoic. If something is scurrilous then it is not bantering. Langston is not scurrilous.", "logic": "\nSometime(langston)\nScurrilous(langston)\nSylphlike(langston)\nnot Wartlike(langston)\nAllantoic(eldon)\nScurrilous(sarina)\nWartlike(sarina)\nforall x (Allantoic(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) and Sylphlike(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Plumping(x) and not Sometime(x) -> not Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> not Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> not Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) and Allantoic(x) -> not Wartlike(x))\nnot Plumping(sarina) -> Allantoic(sarina)\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) -> not Bantering(x))\n\nnot Scurrilous(langston)\n\ntherefore Scurrilous(langston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Valene is rateable. Valene is dextrous. Valene is crocketed. Valene is not mannered. Dorcas is censorial. Georges is dextrous. Georges is mannered. If something is censorial then it is dextrous. All mannered, crocketed things are dextrous. If something is greater and not rateable then it is not dextrous. If something is largo then it is not dextrous. If something is largo then it is not mannered. If something is dextrous and censorial then it is not mannered. If Georges is not greater then Georges is censorial. If something is dextrous then it is not largo. Dorcas is dextrous.", "logic": "\nRateable(valene)\nDextrous(valene)\nCrocketed(valene)\nnot Mannered(valene)\nCensorial(dorcas)\nDextrous(georges)\nMannered(georges)\nforall x (Censorial(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Greater(x) and not Rateable(x) -> not Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Largo(x) -> not Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Largo(x) -> not Mannered(x))\nforall x (Dextrous(x) and Censorial(x) -> not Mannered(x))\nnot Greater(georges) -> Censorial(georges)\nforall x (Dextrous(x) -> not Largo(x))\n\nDextrous(dorcas)\n\nCensorial(dorcas) and forall x (Censorial(x) -> Dextrous(x)) -> therefore Dextrous(dorcas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Minta is aligned. Minta is egyptian. Minta is spotted. Minta is not unwooded. Leisha is offended. Suzan is egyptian. Suzan is unwooded. If something is offended then it is egyptian. All unwooded, spotted things are egyptian. If something is uninvolved and not aligned then it is not egyptian. If something is paternal then it is not egyptian. If something is paternal then it is not unwooded. If something is egyptian and offended then it is not unwooded. If Suzan is not uninvolved then Suzan is offended. If something is egyptian then it is not paternal. Minta is paternal.", "logic": "\nAligned(minta)\nEgyptian(minta)\nSpotted(minta)\nnot Unwooded(minta)\nOffended(leisha)\nEgyptian(suzan)\nUnwooded(suzan)\nforall x (Offended(x) -> Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Unwooded(x) and Spotted(x) -> Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Uninvolved(x) and not Aligned(x) -> not Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> not Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> not Unwooded(x))\nforall x (Egyptian(x) and Offended(x) -> not Unwooded(x))\nnot Uninvolved(suzan) -> Offended(suzan)\nforall x (Egyptian(x) -> not Paternal(x))\n\nPaternal(minta)\n\nEgyptian(minta) and forall x (Egyptian(x) -> not Paternal(x)) -> therefore not Paternal(minta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Hally is cushiony. Hally is spinnable. Hally is queenly. Hally is not teachable. Mayer is sadistic. Caroline is spinnable. Caroline is teachable. If something is sadistic then it is spinnable. All teachable, queenly things are spinnable. If something is duteous and not cushiony then it is not spinnable. If something is shriveled then it is not spinnable. If something is shriveled then it is not teachable. If something is spinnable and sadistic then it is not teachable. If Caroline is not duteous then Caroline is sadistic. If something is spinnable then it is not shriveled. Mayer is not teachable.", "logic": "\nCushiony(hally)\nSpinnable(hally)\nQueenly(hally)\nnot Teachable(hally)\nSadistic(mayer)\nSpinnable(caroline)\nTeachable(caroline)\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) and Queenly(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Duteous(x) and not Cushiony(x) -> not Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Shriveled(x) -> not Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Shriveled(x) -> not Teachable(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) and Sadistic(x) -> not Teachable(x))\nnot Duteous(caroline) -> Sadistic(caroline)\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> not Shriveled(x))\n\nnot Teachable(mayer)\n\nSadistic(mayer) and forall x (Sadistic(x) -> Spinnable(x)) -> therefore Spinnable(mayer) Spinnable(mayer) and Sadistic(mayer) and forall x (Spinnable(x) and Sadistic(x) -> not Teachable(x)) -> therefore not Teachable(mayer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Alvira is peaceful. Alvira is faddish. Alvira is cursive. Alvira is not feudatory. Morgen is ovular. Darleen is faddish. Darleen is feudatory. If something is ovular then it is faddish. All feudatory, cursive things are faddish. If something is glabellar and not peaceful then it is not faddish. If something is satiric then it is not faddish. If something is satiric then it is not feudatory. If something is faddish and ovular then it is not feudatory. If Darleen is not glabellar then Darleen is ovular. If something is faddish then it is not satiric. Morgen is feudatory.", "logic": "\nPeaceful(alvira)\nFaddish(alvira)\nCursive(alvira)\nnot Feudatory(alvira)\nOvular(morgen)\nFaddish(darleen)\nFeudatory(darleen)\nforall x (Ovular(x) -> Faddish(x))\nforall x (Feudatory(x) and Cursive(x) -> Faddish(x))\nforall x (Glabellar(x) and not Peaceful(x) -> not Faddish(x))\nforall x (Satiric(x) -> not Faddish(x))\nforall x (Satiric(x) -> not Feudatory(x))\nforall x (Faddish(x) and Ovular(x) -> not Feudatory(x))\nnot Glabellar(darleen) -> Ovular(darleen)\nforall x (Faddish(x) -> not Satiric(x))\n\nFeudatory(morgen)\n\nOvular(morgen) and forall x (Ovular(x) -> Faddish(x)) -> therefore Faddish(morgen) Faddish(morgen) and Ovular(morgen) and forall x (Faddish(x) and Ovular(x) -> not Feudatory(x)) -> therefore not Feudatory(morgen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Gen is empathetic. Gen is paraguayan. Gen is betrothed. Gen is not layered. Rebbecca is sultry. Maurene is paraguayan. Maurene is layered. If something is sultry then it is paraguayan. All layered, betrothed things are paraguayan. If something is munificent and not empathetic then it is not paraguayan. If something is overbusy then it is not paraguayan. If something is overbusy then it is not layered. If something is paraguayan and sultry then it is not layered. If Maurene is not munificent then Maurene is sultry. If something is paraguayan then it is not overbusy. Maurene is not sultry.", "logic": "\nEmpathetic(gen)\nParaguayan(gen)\nBetrothed(gen)\nnot Layered(gen)\nSultry(rebbecca)\nParaguayan(maurene)\nLayered(maurene)\nforall x (Sultry(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) and Betrothed(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Munificent(x) and not Empathetic(x) -> not Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Overbusy(x) -> not Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Overbusy(x) -> not Layered(x))\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) and Sultry(x) -> not Layered(x))\nnot Munificent(maurene) -> Sultry(maurene)\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) -> not Overbusy(x))\n\nnot Sultry(maurene)\n\nnot Munificent(maurene) -> Sultry(maurene) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Tomasina is ghoulish. Tomasina is dentate. Tomasina is argentine. Tomasina is not nineteen. Ricard is abrasive. Roni is dentate. Roni is nineteen. If something is abrasive then it is dentate. All nineteen, argentine things are dentate. If something is forgiving and not ghoulish then it is not dentate. If something is silvan then it is not dentate. If something is silvan then it is not nineteen. If something is dentate and abrasive then it is not nineteen. If Roni is not forgiving then Roni is abrasive. If something is dentate then it is not silvan. Roni is argentine.", "logic": "\nGhoulish(tomasina)\nDentate(tomasina)\nArgentine(tomasina)\nnot Nineteen(tomasina)\nAbrasive(ricard)\nDentate(roni)\nNineteen(roni)\nforall x (Abrasive(x) -> Dentate(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) and Argentine(x) -> Dentate(x))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) and not Ghoulish(x) -> not Dentate(x))\nforall x (Silvan(x) -> not Dentate(x))\nforall x (Silvan(x) -> not Nineteen(x))\nforall x (Dentate(x) and Abrasive(x) -> not Nineteen(x))\nnot Forgiving(roni) -> Abrasive(roni)\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> not Silvan(x))\n\nArgentine(roni)\n\nArgentine(roni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Kirsteni is rotted. Kirsteni is frowning. Kirsteni is opalescent. Kirsteni is not spotted. Germaine is scraggy. Ianthe is frowning. Ianthe is spotted. If something is scraggy then it is frowning. All spotted, opalescent things are frowning. If something is ctenoid and not rotted then it is not frowning. If something is baking then it is not frowning. If something is baking then it is not spotted. If something is frowning and scraggy then it is not spotted. If Ianthe is not ctenoid then Ianthe is scraggy. If something is frowning then it is not baking. Ianthe is not rotted.", "logic": "\nRotted(kirsteni)\nFrowning(kirsteni)\nOpalescent(kirsteni)\nnot Spotted(kirsteni)\nScraggy(germaine)\nFrowning(ianthe)\nSpotted(ianthe)\nforall x (Scraggy(x) -> Frowning(x))\nforall x (Spotted(x) and Opalescent(x) -> Frowning(x))\nforall x (Ctenoid(x) and not Rotted(x) -> not Frowning(x))\nforall x (Baking(x) -> not Frowning(x))\nforall x (Baking(x) -> not Spotted(x))\nforall x (Frowning(x) and Scraggy(x) -> not Spotted(x))\nnot Ctenoid(ianthe) -> Scraggy(ianthe)\nforall x (Frowning(x) -> not Baking(x))\n\nnot Rotted(ianthe)\n\nnot Rotted(ianthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Andonis is fastidious. Andonis is graven. Andonis is vivace. Andonis is not conceptive. Athena is cloisonne. Orazio is graven. Orazio is conceptive. If something is cloisonne then it is graven. All conceptive, vivace things are graven. If something is azoic and not fastidious then it is not graven. If something is arcadian then it is not graven. If something is arcadian then it is not conceptive. If something is graven and cloisonne then it is not conceptive. If Orazio is not azoic then Orazio is cloisonne. If something is graven then it is not arcadian. Athena is azoic.", "logic": "\nFastidious(andonis)\nGraven(andonis)\nVivace(andonis)\nnot Conceptive(andonis)\nCloisonne(athena)\nGraven(orazio)\nConceptive(orazio)\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Graven(x))\nforall x (Conceptive(x) and Vivace(x) -> Graven(x))\nforall x (Azoic(x) and not Fastidious(x) -> not Graven(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> not Graven(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> not Conceptive(x))\nforall x (Graven(x) and Cloisonne(x) -> not Conceptive(x))\nnot Azoic(orazio) -> Cloisonne(orazio)\nforall x (Graven(x) -> not Arcadian(x))\n\nAzoic(athena)\n\nAzoic(athena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Marty is pyloric. Marty is ruminant. Marty is both. Marty is not lustreless. Lavinie is fastigiate. Tracie is ruminant. Tracie is lustreless. If something is fastigiate then it is ruminant. All lustreless, both things are ruminant. If something is incertain and not pyloric then it is not ruminant. If something is uncapped then it is not ruminant. If something is uncapped then it is not lustreless. If something is ruminant and fastigiate then it is not lustreless. If Tracie is not incertain then Tracie is fastigiate. If something is ruminant then it is not uncapped. Lavinie is not both.", "logic": "\nPyloric(marty)\nRuminant(marty)\nBoth(marty)\nnot Lustreless(marty)\nFastigiate(lavinie)\nRuminant(tracie)\nLustreless(tracie)\nforall x (Fastigiate(x) -> Ruminant(x))\nforall x (Lustreless(x) and Both(x) -> Ruminant(x))\nforall x (Incertain(x) and not Pyloric(x) -> not Ruminant(x))\nforall x (Uncapped(x) -> not Ruminant(x))\nforall x (Uncapped(x) -> not Lustreless(x))\nforall x (Ruminant(x) and Fastigiate(x) -> not Lustreless(x))\nnot Incertain(tracie) -> Fastigiate(tracie)\nforall x (Ruminant(x) -> not Uncapped(x))\n\nnot Both(lavinie)\n\nnot Both(lavinie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "Rikki is capsular. Rikki is diclinous. Rikki is skinless. Rikki is not immovable. Moore is popliteal. Ebeneser is diclinous. Ebeneser is immovable. If something is popliteal then it is diclinous. All immovable, skinless things are diclinous. If something is framed and not capsular then it is not diclinous. If something is chapleted then it is not diclinous. If something is chapleted then it is not immovable. If something is diclinous and popliteal then it is not immovable. If Ebeneser is not framed then Ebeneser is popliteal. If something is diclinous then it is not chapleted. Rikki is popliteal.", "logic": "\nCapsular(rikki)\nDiclinous(rikki)\nSkinless(rikki)\nnot Immovable(rikki)\nPopliteal(moore)\nDiclinous(ebeneser)\nImmovable(ebeneser)\nforall x (Popliteal(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Immovable(x) and Skinless(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Framed(x) and not Capsular(x) -> not Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Chapleted(x) -> not Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Chapleted(x) -> not Immovable(x))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) and Popliteal(x) -> not Immovable(x))\nnot Framed(ebeneser) -> Popliteal(ebeneser)\nforall x (Diclinous(x) -> not Chapleted(x))\n\nPopliteal(rikki)\n\nPopliteal(rikki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-738"} {"premises": "The kimberley is unflavored. The kimberley is developed. The kimberley is retired. All unflavored, retired people are staid. All developed, staid people are unsecured. The kimberley is unflavored.", "logic": "\nUnflavored(kimberley)\nDeveloped(kimberley)\nRetired(kimberley)\nforall x (Unflavored(x) and Retired(x) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Developed(x) and Staid(x) -> Unsecured(x))\n\nUnflavored(kimberley)\n\ntherefore Unflavored(kimberley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The lynsey is combed. The lynsey is blasted. The lynsey is aggravated. All combed, aggravated people are wizardly. All blasted, wizardly people are perfumed. The lynsey is not blasted.", "logic": "\nCombed(lynsey)\nBlasted(lynsey)\nAggravated(lynsey)\nforall x (Combed(x) and Aggravated(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Blasted(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Perfumed(x))\n\nnot Blasted(lynsey)\n\ntherefore Blasted(lynsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The leslie is hydric. The leslie is omnibus. The leslie is confiscate. All hydric, confiscate people are manorial. All omnibus, manorial people are unrealized. The leslie is manorial.", "logic": "\nHydric(leslie)\nOmnibus(leslie)\nConfiscate(leslie)\nforall x (Hydric(x) and Confiscate(x) -> Manorial(x))\nforall x (Omnibus(x) and Manorial(x) -> Unrealized(x))\n\nManorial(leslie)\n\nHydric(leslie) and Confiscate(leslie) and forall x (Hydric(x) and Confiscate(x) -> Manorial(x)) -> therefore Manorial(leslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The hermione is sensitised. The hermione is approving. The hermione is amyloid. All sensitised, amyloid people are voluptuary. All approving, voluptuary people are unthankful. The hermione is not voluptuary.", "logic": "\nSensitised(hermione)\nApproving(hermione)\nAmyloid(hermione)\nforall x (Sensitised(x) and Amyloid(x) -> Voluptuary(x))\nforall x (Approving(x) and Voluptuary(x) -> Unthankful(x))\n\nnot Voluptuary(hermione)\n\nSensitised(hermione) and Amyloid(hermione) and forall x (Sensitised(x) and Amyloid(x) -> Voluptuary(x)) -> therefore Voluptuary(hermione)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The jameson is cubistic. The jameson is forgotten. The jameson is russian. All cubistic, russian people are bossy. All forgotten, bossy people are ordained. The jameson is ordained.", "logic": "\nCubistic(jameson)\nForgotten(jameson)\nRussian(jameson)\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Russian(x) -> Bossy(x))\nforall x (Forgotten(x) and Bossy(x) -> Ordained(x))\n\nOrdained(jameson)\n\nCubistic(jameson) and Russian(jameson) and forall x (Cubistic(x) and Russian(x) -> Bossy(x)) -> therefore Bossy(jameson) Forgotten(jameson) and Bossy(jameson) and forall x (Forgotten(x) and Bossy(x) -> Ordained(x)) -> therefore Ordained(jameson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The otho is allometric. The otho is bootleg. The otho is candid. All allometric, candid people are thyroid. All bootleg, thyroid people are apterous. The otho is not apterous.", "logic": "\nAllometric(otho)\nBootleg(otho)\nCandid(otho)\nforall x (Allometric(x) and Candid(x) -> Thyroid(x))\nforall x (Bootleg(x) and Thyroid(x) -> Apterous(x))\n\nnot Apterous(otho)\n\nAllometric(otho) and Candid(otho) and forall x (Allometric(x) and Candid(x) -> Thyroid(x)) -> therefore Thyroid(otho) Bootleg(otho) and Thyroid(otho) and forall x (Bootleg(x) and Thyroid(x) -> Apterous(x)) -> therefore Apterous(otho)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The sybille is ultimate. The sybille is covert. The sybille is abstruse. All ultimate, abstruse people are cenozoic. All covert, cenozoic people are uncaused. The sybille does not visit the sybille.", "logic": "\nUltimate(sybille)\nCovert(sybille)\nAbstruse(sybille)\nforall x (Ultimate(x) and Abstruse(x) -> Cenozoic(x))\nforall x (Covert(x) and Cenozoic(x) -> Uncaused(x))\n\nnot Visits(sybille, sybille)\n\nnot Visits(sybille, sybille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The brande is munificent. The brande is enticing. The brande is andean. All munificent, andean people are dacitic. All enticing, dacitic people are final. The brande needs the brande.", "logic": "\nMunificent(brande)\nEnticing(brande)\nAndean(brande)\nforall x (Munificent(x) and Andean(x) -> Dacitic(x))\nforall x (Enticing(x) and Dacitic(x) -> Final(x))\n\nNeeds(brande, brande)\n\nNeeds(brande, brande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-57"} {"premises": "The lil totter the sybila. The sybila does not need the lil. The joni insure the sybila. The tucky totter the lil. If something totter the lil then the lil is incurious. If something totter the sybila then the sybila is not incurious. If the tucky totter the lil and the tucky does not like the joni then the tucky is furlike. If the lil is incurious and the lil totter the sybila then the lil insure the joni. If something is quebecois and it organise the tucky then the tucky organise the lil. If the lil insure the joni and the joni totter the tucky then the joni does not need the tucky. The tucky totter the lil.", "logic": "\nTotter(lil, sybila)\nnot Insure(sybila, lil)\nInsure(joni, sybila)\nTotter(tucky, lil)\nforall x (Totter(x, lil) -> Incurious(lil))\nforall x (Totter(x, sybila) -> not Incurious(sybila))\nTotter(tucky, lil) and not Organise(tucky, joni) -> Furlike(tucky)\nIncurious(lil) and Totter(lil, sybila) -> Insure(lil, joni)\nforall x (Quebecois(x) and Organise(x, tucky) -> Organise(tucky, lil))\nInsure(lil, joni) and Totter(joni, tucky) -> not Insure(joni, tucky)\n\nTotter(tucky, lil)\n\ntherefore Totter(tucky, lil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The enoch foredate the neale. The neale does not need the enoch. The shanta slur the neale. The moyna foredate the enoch. If something foredate the enoch then the enoch is faithful. If something foredate the neale then the neale is not faithful. If the moyna foredate the enoch and the moyna does not like the shanta then the moyna is virtual. If the enoch is faithful and the enoch foredate the neale then the enoch slur the shanta. If something is private and it dispute the moyna then the moyna dispute the enoch. If the enoch slur the shanta and the shanta foredate the moyna then the shanta does not need the moyna. The moyna does not chase the enoch.", "logic": "\nForedate(enoch, neale)\nnot Slur(neale, enoch)\nSlur(shanta, neale)\nForedate(moyna, enoch)\nforall x (Foredate(x, enoch) -> Faithful(enoch))\nforall x (Foredate(x, neale) -> not Faithful(neale))\nForedate(moyna, enoch) and not Dispute(moyna, shanta) -> Virtual(moyna)\nFaithful(enoch) and Foredate(enoch, neale) -> Slur(enoch, shanta)\nforall x (Private(x) and Dispute(x, moyna) -> Dispute(moyna, enoch))\nSlur(enoch, shanta) and Foredate(shanta, moyna) -> not Slur(shanta, moyna)\n\nnot Foredate(moyna, enoch)\n\ntherefore Foredate(moyna, enoch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The chevy diazotize the gibb. The gibb does not need the chevy. The emilia skitter the gibb. The lisetta diazotize the chevy. If something diazotize the chevy then the chevy is auroral. If something diazotize the gibb then the gibb is not auroral. If the lisetta diazotize the chevy and the lisetta does not like the emilia then the lisetta is semiannual. If the chevy is auroral and the chevy diazotize the gibb then the chevy skitter the emilia. If something is trilingual and it crossbreed the lisetta then the lisetta crossbreed the chevy. If the chevy skitter the emilia and the emilia diazotize the lisetta then the emilia does not need the lisetta. The chevy is auroral.", "logic": "\nDiazotize(chevy, gibb)\nnot Skitter(gibb, chevy)\nSkitter(emilia, gibb)\nDiazotize(lisetta, chevy)\nforall x (Diazotize(x, chevy) -> Auroral(chevy))\nforall x (Diazotize(x, gibb) -> not Auroral(gibb))\nDiazotize(lisetta, chevy) and not Crossbreed(lisetta, emilia) -> Semiannual(lisetta)\nAuroral(chevy) and Diazotize(chevy, gibb) -> Skitter(chevy, emilia)\nforall x (Trilingual(x) and Crossbreed(x, lisetta) -> Crossbreed(lisetta, chevy))\nSkitter(chevy, emilia) and Diazotize(emilia, lisetta) -> not Skitter(emilia, lisetta)\n\nAuroral(chevy)\n\nDiazotize(lisetta, chevy) and forall x (Diazotize(x, chevy) -> Auroral(chevy)) -> therefore Auroral(chevy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The merle interlace the jae. The jae does not need the merle. The eryn disbar the jae. The catherin interlace the merle. If something interlace the merle then the merle is alluring. If something interlace the jae then the jae is not alluring. If the catherin interlace the merle and the catherin does not like the eryn then the catherin is slaphappy. If the merle is alluring and the merle interlace the jae then the merle disbar the eryn. If something is anabiotic and it embank the catherin then the catherin embank the merle. If the merle disbar the eryn and the eryn interlace the catherin then the eryn does not need the catherin. The jae is alluring.", "logic": "\nInterlace(merle, jae)\nnot Disbar(jae, merle)\nDisbar(eryn, jae)\nInterlace(catherin, merle)\nforall x (Interlace(x, merle) -> Alluring(merle))\nforall x (Interlace(x, jae) -> not Alluring(jae))\nInterlace(catherin, merle) and not Embank(catherin, eryn) -> Slaphappy(catherin)\nAlluring(merle) and Interlace(merle, jae) -> Disbar(merle, eryn)\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and Embank(x, catherin) -> Embank(catherin, merle))\nDisbar(merle, eryn) and Interlace(eryn, catherin) -> not Disbar(eryn, catherin)\n\nAlluring(jae)\n\nInterlace(merle, jae) and forall x (Interlace(x, jae) -> not Alluring(jae)) -> therefore not Alluring(jae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The bettie reschedule the berte. The berte does not need the bettie. The kaleena plumb the berte. The lilias reschedule the bettie. If something reschedule the bettie then the bettie is caroline. If something reschedule the berte then the berte is not caroline. If the lilias reschedule the bettie and the lilias does not like the kaleena then the lilias is yearly. If the bettie is caroline and the bettie reschedule the berte then the bettie plumb the kaleena. If something is jesting and it ditto the lilias then the lilias ditto the bettie. If the bettie plumb the kaleena and the kaleena reschedule the lilias then the kaleena does not need the lilias. The bettie plumb the kaleena.", "logic": "\nReschedule(bettie, berte)\nnot Plumb(berte, bettie)\nPlumb(kaleena, berte)\nReschedule(lilias, bettie)\nforall x (Reschedule(x, bettie) -> Caroline(bettie))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, berte) -> not Caroline(berte))\nReschedule(lilias, bettie) and not Ditto(lilias, kaleena) -> Yearly(lilias)\nCaroline(bettie) and Reschedule(bettie, berte) -> Plumb(bettie, kaleena)\nforall x (Jesting(x) and Ditto(x, lilias) -> Ditto(lilias, bettie))\nPlumb(bettie, kaleena) and Reschedule(kaleena, lilias) -> not Plumb(kaleena, lilias)\n\nPlumb(bettie, kaleena)\n\nReschedule(lilias, bettie) and forall x (Reschedule(x, bettie) -> Caroline(bettie)) -> therefore Caroline(bettie) Caroline(bettie) and Reschedule(bettie, berte) and Caroline(bettie) and Reschedule(bettie, berte) -> Plumb(bettie, kaleena) -> therefore Plumb(bettie, kaleena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The shell bask the brady. The brady does not need the shell. The mavra secern the brady. The desdemona bask the shell. If something bask the shell then the shell is binaural. If something bask the brady then the brady is not binaural. If the desdemona bask the shell and the desdemona does not like the mavra then the desdemona is unique. If the shell is binaural and the shell bask the brady then the shell secern the mavra. If something is picky and it reappear the desdemona then the desdemona reappear the shell. If the shell secern the mavra and the mavra bask the desdemona then the mavra does not need the desdemona. The shell does not need the mavra.", "logic": "\nBask(shell, brady)\nnot Secern(brady, shell)\nSecern(mavra, brady)\nBask(desdemona, shell)\nforall x (Bask(x, shell) -> Binaural(shell))\nforall x (Bask(x, brady) -> not Binaural(brady))\nBask(desdemona, shell) and not Reappear(desdemona, mavra) -> Unique(desdemona)\nBinaural(shell) and Bask(shell, brady) -> Secern(shell, mavra)\nforall x (Picky(x) and Reappear(x, desdemona) -> Reappear(desdemona, shell))\nSecern(shell, mavra) and Bask(mavra, desdemona) -> not Secern(mavra, desdemona)\n\nnot Secern(shell, mavra)\n\nBask(desdemona, shell) and forall x (Bask(x, shell) -> Binaural(shell)) -> therefore Binaural(shell) Binaural(shell) and Bask(shell, brady) and Binaural(shell) and Bask(shell, brady) -> Secern(shell, mavra) -> therefore Secern(shell, mavra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The talbert correlate the roth. The roth does not need the talbert. The brita dock the roth. The krysta correlate the talbert. If something correlate the talbert then the talbert is austral. If something correlate the roth then the roth is not austral. If the krysta correlate the talbert and the krysta does not like the brita then the krysta is grasping. If the talbert is austral and the talbert correlate the roth then the talbert dock the brita. If something is bendable and it reify the krysta then the krysta reify the talbert. If the talbert dock the brita and the brita correlate the krysta then the brita does not need the krysta. The krysta does not like the talbert.", "logic": "\nCorrelate(talbert, roth)\nnot Dock(roth, talbert)\nDock(brita, roth)\nCorrelate(krysta, talbert)\nforall x (Correlate(x, talbert) -> Austral(talbert))\nforall x (Correlate(x, roth) -> not Austral(roth))\nCorrelate(krysta, talbert) and not Reify(krysta, brita) -> Grasping(krysta)\nAustral(talbert) and Correlate(talbert, roth) -> Dock(talbert, brita)\nforall x (Bendable(x) and Reify(x, krysta) -> Reify(krysta, talbert))\nDock(talbert, brita) and Correlate(brita, krysta) -> not Dock(brita, krysta)\n\nnot Reify(krysta, talbert)\n\nforall x (Bendable(x) and Reify(x, krysta) -> Reify(krysta, talbert)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The vina brabble the birgit. The birgit does not need the vina. The faina nourish the birgit. The zorah brabble the vina. If something brabble the vina then the vina is inspiring. If something brabble the birgit then the birgit is not inspiring. If the zorah brabble the vina and the zorah does not like the faina then the zorah is flaming. If the vina is inspiring and the vina brabble the birgit then the vina nourish the faina. If something is neolithic and it putty the zorah then the zorah putty the vina. If the vina nourish the faina and the faina brabble the zorah then the faina does not need the zorah. The zorah is flaming.", "logic": "\nBrabble(vina, birgit)\nnot Nourish(birgit, vina)\nNourish(faina, birgit)\nBrabble(zorah, vina)\nforall x (Brabble(x, vina) -> Inspiring(vina))\nforall x (Brabble(x, birgit) -> not Inspiring(birgit))\nBrabble(zorah, vina) and not Putty(zorah, faina) -> Flaming(zorah)\nInspiring(vina) and Brabble(vina, birgit) -> Nourish(vina, faina)\nforall x (Neolithic(x) and Putty(x, zorah) -> Putty(zorah, vina))\nNourish(vina, faina) and Brabble(faina, zorah) -> not Nourish(faina, zorah)\n\nFlaming(zorah)\n\nBrabble(zorah, vina) and not Putty(zorah, faina) -> Flaming(zorah) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The emmett allocate the lyle. The lyle does not need the emmett. The skelly uncloak the lyle. The everard allocate the emmett. If something allocate the emmett then the emmett is scrubbed. If something allocate the lyle then the lyle is not scrubbed. If the everard allocate the emmett and the everard does not like the skelly then the everard is pinstriped. If the emmett is scrubbed and the emmett allocate the lyle then the emmett uncloak the skelly. If something is flaunty and it satisfise the everard then the everard satisfise the emmett. If the emmett uncloak the skelly and the skelly allocate the everard then the skelly does not need the everard. The lyle is not flaunty.", "logic": "\nAllocate(emmett, lyle)\nnot Uncloak(lyle, emmett)\nUncloak(skelly, lyle)\nAllocate(everard, emmett)\nforall x (Allocate(x, emmett) -> Scrubbed(emmett))\nforall x (Allocate(x, lyle) -> not Scrubbed(lyle))\nAllocate(everard, emmett) and not Satisfise(everard, skelly) -> Pinstriped(everard)\nScrubbed(emmett) and Allocate(emmett, lyle) -> Uncloak(emmett, skelly)\nforall x (Flaunty(x) and Satisfise(x, everard) -> Satisfise(everard, emmett))\nUncloak(emmett, skelly) and Allocate(skelly, everard) -> not Uncloak(skelly, everard)\n\nnot Flaunty(lyle)\n\nnot Flaunty(lyle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The jacqui block the janot. The janot does not need the jacqui. The row photograph the janot. The hercule block the jacqui. If something block the jacqui then the jacqui is lyonnaise. If something block the janot then the janot is not lyonnaise. If the hercule block the jacqui and the hercule does not like the row then the hercule is restless. If the jacqui is lyonnaise and the jacqui block the janot then the jacqui photograph the row. If something is riotous and it remain the hercule then the hercule remain the jacqui. If the jacqui photograph the row and the row block the hercule then the row does not need the hercule. The janot remain the janot.", "logic": "\nBlock(jacqui, janot)\nnot Photograph(janot, jacqui)\nPhotograph(row, janot)\nBlock(hercule, jacqui)\nforall x (Block(x, jacqui) -> Lyonnaise(jacqui))\nforall x (Block(x, janot) -> not Lyonnaise(janot))\nBlock(hercule, jacqui) and not Remain(hercule, row) -> Restless(hercule)\nLyonnaise(jacqui) and Block(jacqui, janot) -> Photograph(jacqui, row)\nforall x (Riotous(x) and Remain(x, hercule) -> Remain(hercule, jacqui))\nPhotograph(jacqui, row) and Block(row, hercule) -> not Photograph(row, hercule)\n\nRemain(janot, janot)\n\nRemain(janot, janot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The king reallocate the larisa. The larisa does not need the king. The heath legitimise the larisa. The angelina reallocate the king. If something reallocate the king then the king is sunburned. If something reallocate the larisa then the larisa is not sunburned. If the angelina reallocate the king and the angelina does not like the heath then the angelina is standby. If the king is sunburned and the king reallocate the larisa then the king legitimise the heath. If something is alluring and it tinge the angelina then the angelina tinge the king. If the king legitimise the heath and the heath reallocate the angelina then the heath does not need the angelina. The angelina does not need the angelina.", "logic": "\nReallocate(king, larisa)\nnot Legitimise(larisa, king)\nLegitimise(heath, larisa)\nReallocate(angelina, king)\nforall x (Reallocate(x, king) -> Sunburned(king))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, larisa) -> not Sunburned(larisa))\nReallocate(angelina, king) and not Tinge(angelina, heath) -> Standby(angelina)\nSunburned(king) and Reallocate(king, larisa) -> Legitimise(king, heath)\nforall x (Alluring(x) and Tinge(x, angelina) -> Tinge(angelina, king))\nLegitimise(king, heath) and Reallocate(heath, angelina) -> not Legitimise(heath, angelina)\n\nnot Legitimise(angelina, angelina)\n\nnot Legitimise(angelina, angelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The cherish malnourish the lanie. The lanie does not need the cherish. The jared carbonize the lanie. The russ malnourish the cherish. If something malnourish the cherish then the cherish is galilean. If something malnourish the lanie then the lanie is not galilean. If the russ malnourish the cherish and the russ does not like the jared then the russ is unredeemed. If the cherish is galilean and the cherish malnourish the lanie then the cherish carbonize the jared. If something is powdery and it abduct the russ then the russ abduct the cherish. If the cherish carbonize the jared and the jared malnourish the russ then the jared does not need the russ. The cherish malnourish the russ.", "logic": "\nMalnourish(cherish, lanie)\nnot Carbonize(lanie, cherish)\nCarbonize(jared, lanie)\nMalnourish(russ, cherish)\nforall x (Malnourish(x, cherish) -> Galilean(cherish))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, lanie) -> not Galilean(lanie))\nMalnourish(russ, cherish) and not Abduct(russ, jared) -> Unredeemed(russ)\nGalilean(cherish) and Malnourish(cherish, lanie) -> Carbonize(cherish, jared)\nforall x (Powdery(x) and Abduct(x, russ) -> Abduct(russ, cherish))\nCarbonize(cherish, jared) and Malnourish(jared, russ) -> not Carbonize(jared, russ)\n\nMalnourish(cherish, russ)\n\nMalnourish(cherish, russ) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-968"} {"premises": "The madella is secular. The madella is theoretic. The madella is senescent. The madella is cacuminal. The madella dignify the becky. The becky dignify the madella. The amata bike the becky. The amata is theoretic. The amata is cacuminal. The amata dignify the madella. If the madella bike the becky then the madella bike the amata. If something dignify the becky then it is senescent. If the madella aliment the becky then the becky aliment the amata. If something is visualized and it dignify the amata then it aliment the amata. If something bike the madella then it aliment the madella. If something bike the amata then the amata aliment the becky. If something bike the becky then it dignify the becky. If something bike the madella and the madella dignify the becky then it dignify the amata. The becky dignify the madella.", "logic": "\nSecular(madella)\nTheoretic(madella)\nSenescent(madella)\nCacuminal(madella)\nDignify(madella, becky)\nDignify(becky, madella)\nBike(amata, becky)\nTheoretic(amata)\nCacuminal(amata)\nDignify(amata, madella)\nBike(madella, becky) -> Bike(madella, amata)\nforall x (Dignify(x, becky) -> Senescent(x))\nAliment(madella, becky) -> Aliment(becky, amata)\nforall x (Visualized(x) and Dignify(x, amata) -> Aliment(x, amata))\nforall x (Bike(x, madella) -> Aliment(x, madella))\nforall x (Bike(x, amata) -> Aliment(amata, becky))\nforall x (Bike(x, becky) -> Dignify(x, becky))\nforall x (Bike(x, madella) and Dignify(madella, becky) -> Dignify(x, amata))\n\nDignify(becky, madella)\n\ntherefore Dignify(becky, madella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The lezlie is ecologic. The lezlie is south. The lezlie is corymbose. The lezlie is alluvial. The lezlie sulfate the angie. The angie sulfate the lezlie. The catha somersault the angie. The catha is south. The catha is alluvial. The catha sulfate the lezlie. If the lezlie somersault the angie then the lezlie somersault the catha. If something sulfate the angie then it is corymbose. If the lezlie unsettle the angie then the angie unsettle the catha. If something is stoical and it sulfate the catha then it unsettle the catha. If something somersault the lezlie then it unsettle the lezlie. If something somersault the catha then the catha unsettle the angie. If something somersault the angie then it sulfate the angie. If something somersault the lezlie and the lezlie sulfate the angie then it sulfate the catha. The lezlie is not alluvial.", "logic": "\nEcologic(lezlie)\nSouth(lezlie)\nCorymbose(lezlie)\nAlluvial(lezlie)\nSulfate(lezlie, angie)\nSulfate(angie, lezlie)\nSomersault(catha, angie)\nSouth(catha)\nAlluvial(catha)\nSulfate(catha, lezlie)\nSomersault(lezlie, angie) -> Somersault(lezlie, catha)\nforall x (Sulfate(x, angie) -> Corymbose(x))\nUnsettle(lezlie, angie) -> Unsettle(angie, catha)\nforall x (Stoical(x) and Sulfate(x, catha) -> Unsettle(x, catha))\nforall x (Somersault(x, lezlie) -> Unsettle(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Somersault(x, catha) -> Unsettle(catha, angie))\nforall x (Somersault(x, angie) -> Sulfate(x, angie))\nforall x (Somersault(x, lezlie) and Sulfate(lezlie, angie) -> Sulfate(x, catha))\n\nnot Alluvial(lezlie)\n\ntherefore Alluvial(lezlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The marisa is campestral. The marisa is querulous. The marisa is loutish. The marisa is zealous. The marisa article the rubetta. The rubetta article the marisa. The monique cinematise the rubetta. The monique is querulous. The monique is zealous. The monique article the marisa. If the marisa cinematise the rubetta then the marisa cinematise the monique. If something article the rubetta then it is loutish. If the marisa counter the rubetta then the rubetta counter the monique. If something is gyroscopic and it article the monique then it counter the monique. If something cinematise the marisa then it counter the marisa. If something cinematise the monique then the monique counter the rubetta. If something cinematise the rubetta then it article the rubetta. If something cinematise the marisa and the marisa article the rubetta then it article the monique. The monique article the rubetta.", "logic": "\nCampestral(marisa)\nQuerulous(marisa)\nLoutish(marisa)\nZealous(marisa)\nArticle(marisa, rubetta)\nArticle(rubetta, marisa)\nCinematise(monique, rubetta)\nQuerulous(monique)\nZealous(monique)\nArticle(monique, marisa)\nCinematise(marisa, rubetta) -> Cinematise(marisa, monique)\nforall x (Article(x, rubetta) -> Loutish(x))\nCounter(marisa, rubetta) -> Counter(rubetta, monique)\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) and Article(x, monique) -> Counter(x, monique))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, marisa) -> Counter(x, marisa))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, monique) -> Counter(monique, rubetta))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, rubetta) -> Article(x, rubetta))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, marisa) and Article(marisa, rubetta) -> Article(x, monique))\n\nArticle(monique, rubetta)\n\nCinematise(monique, rubetta) and forall x (Cinematise(x, rubetta) -> Article(x, rubetta)) -> therefore Article(monique, rubetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The zora is maimed. The zora is octal. The zora is ranked. The zora is shod. The zora dilapidate the mervin. The mervin dilapidate the zora. The rhody raze the mervin. The rhody is octal. The rhody is shod. The rhody dilapidate the zora. If the zora raze the mervin then the zora raze the rhody. If something dilapidate the mervin then it is ranked. If the zora liaise the mervin then the mervin liaise the rhody. If something is synchronal and it dilapidate the rhody then it liaise the rhody. If something raze the zora then it liaise the zora. If something raze the rhody then the rhody liaise the mervin. If something raze the mervin then it dilapidate the mervin. If something raze the zora and the zora dilapidate the mervin then it dilapidate the rhody. The rhody does not see the mervin.", "logic": "\nMaimed(zora)\nOctal(zora)\nRanked(zora)\nShod(zora)\nDilapidate(zora, mervin)\nDilapidate(mervin, zora)\nRaze(rhody, mervin)\nOctal(rhody)\nShod(rhody)\nDilapidate(rhody, zora)\nRaze(zora, mervin) -> Raze(zora, rhody)\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, mervin) -> Ranked(x))\nLiaise(zora, mervin) -> Liaise(mervin, rhody)\nforall x (Synchronal(x) and Dilapidate(x, rhody) -> Liaise(x, rhody))\nforall x (Raze(x, zora) -> Liaise(x, zora))\nforall x (Raze(x, rhody) -> Liaise(rhody, mervin))\nforall x (Raze(x, mervin) -> Dilapidate(x, mervin))\nforall x (Raze(x, zora) and Dilapidate(zora, mervin) -> Dilapidate(x, rhody))\n\nnot Dilapidate(rhody, mervin)\n\nRaze(rhody, mervin) and forall x (Raze(x, mervin) -> Dilapidate(x, mervin)) -> therefore Dilapidate(rhody, mervin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The ted is ferny. The ted is divergent. The ted is subsonic. The ted is nerveless. The ted rick the marta. The marta rick the ted. The marc chart the marta. The marc is divergent. The marc is nerveless. The marc rick the ted. If the ted chart the marta then the ted chart the marc. If something rick the marta then it is subsonic. If the ted snore the marta then the marta snore the marc. If something is guarded and it rick the marc then it snore the marc. If something chart the ted then it snore the ted. If something chart the marc then the marc snore the marta. If something chart the marta then it rick the marta. If something chart the ted and the ted rick the marta then it rick the marc. The marc is subsonic.", "logic": "\nFerny(ted)\nDivergent(ted)\nSubsonic(ted)\nNerveless(ted)\nRick(ted, marta)\nRick(marta, ted)\nChart(marc, marta)\nDivergent(marc)\nNerveless(marc)\nRick(marc, ted)\nChart(ted, marta) -> Chart(ted, marc)\nforall x (Rick(x, marta) -> Subsonic(x))\nSnore(ted, marta) -> Snore(marta, marc)\nforall x (Guarded(x) and Rick(x, marc) -> Snore(x, marc))\nforall x (Chart(x, ted) -> Snore(x, ted))\nforall x (Chart(x, marc) -> Snore(marc, marta))\nforall x (Chart(x, marta) -> Rick(x, marta))\nforall x (Chart(x, ted) and Rick(ted, marta) -> Rick(x, marc))\n\nSubsonic(marc)\n\nChart(marc, marta) and forall x (Chart(x, marta) -> Rick(x, marta)) -> therefore Rick(marc, marta) Rick(marc, marta) and forall x (Rick(x, marta) -> Subsonic(x)) -> therefore Subsonic(marc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The valma is average. The valma is millionth. The valma is tapering. The valma is bicentric. The valma sidetrack the honor. The honor sidetrack the valma. The reine license the honor. The reine is millionth. The reine is bicentric. The reine sidetrack the valma. If the valma license the honor then the valma license the reine. If something sidetrack the honor then it is tapering. If the valma circuit the honor then the honor circuit the reine. If something is official and it sidetrack the reine then it circuit the reine. If something license the valma then it circuit the valma. If something license the reine then the reine circuit the honor. If something license the honor then it sidetrack the honor. If something license the valma and the valma sidetrack the honor then it sidetrack the reine. The reine is not tapering.", "logic": "\nAverage(valma)\nMillionth(valma)\nTapering(valma)\nBicentric(valma)\nSidetrack(valma, honor)\nSidetrack(honor, valma)\nLicense(reine, honor)\nMillionth(reine)\nBicentric(reine)\nSidetrack(reine, valma)\nLicense(valma, honor) -> License(valma, reine)\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, honor) -> Tapering(x))\nCircuit(valma, honor) -> Circuit(honor, reine)\nforall x (Official(x) and Sidetrack(x, reine) -> Circuit(x, reine))\nforall x (License(x, valma) -> Circuit(x, valma))\nforall x (License(x, reine) -> Circuit(reine, honor))\nforall x (License(x, honor) -> Sidetrack(x, honor))\nforall x (License(x, valma) and Sidetrack(valma, honor) -> Sidetrack(x, reine))\n\nnot Tapering(reine)\n\nLicense(reine, honor) and forall x (License(x, honor) -> Sidetrack(x, honor)) -> therefore Sidetrack(reine, honor) Sidetrack(reine, honor) and forall x (Sidetrack(x, honor) -> Tapering(x)) -> therefore Tapering(reine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The dodie is anaphasic. The dodie is exilic. The dodie is spruce. The dodie is bourgeois. The dodie stable the crista. The crista stable the dodie. The vern shuttle the crista. The vern is exilic. The vern is bourgeois. The vern stable the dodie. If the dodie shuttle the crista then the dodie shuttle the vern. If something stable the crista then it is spruce. If the dodie transduce the crista then the crista transduce the vern. If something is wasteful and it stable the vern then it transduce the vern. If something shuttle the dodie then it transduce the dodie. If something shuttle the vern then the vern transduce the crista. If something shuttle the crista then it stable the crista. If something shuttle the dodie and the dodie stable the crista then it stable the vern. The crista does not visit the dodie.", "logic": "\nAnaphasic(dodie)\nExilic(dodie)\nSpruce(dodie)\nBourgeois(dodie)\nStable(dodie, crista)\nStable(crista, dodie)\nShuttle(vern, crista)\nExilic(vern)\nBourgeois(vern)\nStable(vern, dodie)\nShuttle(dodie, crista) -> Shuttle(dodie, vern)\nforall x (Stable(x, crista) -> Spruce(x))\nTransduce(dodie, crista) -> Transduce(crista, vern)\nforall x (Wasteful(x) and Stable(x, vern) -> Transduce(x, vern))\nforall x (Shuttle(x, dodie) -> Transduce(x, dodie))\nforall x (Shuttle(x, vern) -> Transduce(vern, crista))\nforall x (Shuttle(x, crista) -> Stable(x, crista))\nforall x (Shuttle(x, dodie) and Stable(dodie, crista) -> Stable(x, vern))\n\nnot Transduce(crista, dodie)\n\nforall x (Shuttle(x, dodie) -> Transduce(x, dodie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The madel is serried. The madel is bland. The madel is decompound. The madel is freeborn. The madel quarrel the cappella. The cappella quarrel the madel. The olga highjack the cappella. The olga is bland. The olga is freeborn. The olga quarrel the madel. If the madel highjack the cappella then the madel highjack the olga. If something quarrel the cappella then it is decompound. If the madel sovietise the cappella then the cappella sovietise the olga. If something is dingy and it quarrel the olga then it sovietise the olga. If something highjack the madel then it sovietise the madel. If something highjack the olga then the olga sovietise the cappella. If something highjack the cappella then it quarrel the cappella. If something highjack the madel and the madel quarrel the cappella then it quarrel the olga. The cappella is decompound.", "logic": "\nSerried(madel)\nBland(madel)\nDecompound(madel)\nFreeborn(madel)\nQuarrel(madel, cappella)\nQuarrel(cappella, madel)\nHighjack(olga, cappella)\nBland(olga)\nFreeborn(olga)\nQuarrel(olga, madel)\nHighjack(madel, cappella) -> Highjack(madel, olga)\nforall x (Quarrel(x, cappella) -> Decompound(x))\nSovietise(madel, cappella) -> Sovietise(cappella, olga)\nforall x (Dingy(x) and Quarrel(x, olga) -> Sovietise(x, olga))\nforall x (Highjack(x, madel) -> Sovietise(x, madel))\nforall x (Highjack(x, olga) -> Sovietise(olga, cappella))\nforall x (Highjack(x, cappella) -> Quarrel(x, cappella))\nforall x (Highjack(x, madel) and Quarrel(madel, cappella) -> Quarrel(x, olga))\n\nDecompound(cappella)\n\nforall x (Quarrel(x, cappella) -> Decompound(x)) <- forall x (Highjack(x, cappella) -> Quarrel(x, cappella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The melody is latvian. The melody is treacly. The melody is acrophobic. The melody is blooming. The melody route the bridgett. The bridgett route the melody. The freddie despoil the bridgett. The freddie is treacly. The freddie is blooming. The freddie route the melody. If the melody despoil the bridgett then the melody despoil the freddie. If something route the bridgett then it is acrophobic. If the melody gallop the bridgett then the bridgett gallop the freddie. If something is bracteate and it route the freddie then it gallop the freddie. If something despoil the melody then it gallop the melody. If something despoil the freddie then the freddie gallop the bridgett. If something despoil the bridgett then it route the bridgett. If something despoil the melody and the melody route the bridgett then it route the freddie. The freddie does not visit the melody.", "logic": "\nLatvian(melody)\nTreacly(melody)\nAcrophobic(melody)\nBlooming(melody)\nRoute(melody, bridgett)\nRoute(bridgett, melody)\nDespoil(freddie, bridgett)\nTreacly(freddie)\nBlooming(freddie)\nRoute(freddie, melody)\nDespoil(melody, bridgett) -> Despoil(melody, freddie)\nforall x (Route(x, bridgett) -> Acrophobic(x))\nGallop(melody, bridgett) -> Gallop(bridgett, freddie)\nforall x (Bracteate(x) and Route(x, freddie) -> Gallop(x, freddie))\nforall x (Despoil(x, melody) -> Gallop(x, melody))\nforall x (Despoil(x, freddie) -> Gallop(freddie, bridgett))\nforall x (Despoil(x, bridgett) -> Route(x, bridgett))\nforall x (Despoil(x, melody) and Route(melody, bridgett) -> Route(x, freddie))\n\nnot Gallop(freddie, melody)\n\nforall x (Despoil(x, melody) -> Gallop(x, melody)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The gipsy is thousand. The gipsy is gestural. The gipsy is unselected. The gipsy is caseous. The gipsy inject the sapphire. The sapphire inject the gipsy. The fletch precede the sapphire. The fletch is gestural. The fletch is caseous. The fletch inject the gipsy. If the gipsy precede the sapphire then the gipsy precede the fletch. If something inject the sapphire then it is unselected. If the gipsy vegetate the sapphire then the sapphire vegetate the fletch. If something is mawkish and it inject the fletch then it vegetate the fletch. If something precede the gipsy then it vegetate the gipsy. If something precede the fletch then the fletch vegetate the sapphire. If something precede the sapphire then it inject the sapphire. If something precede the gipsy and the gipsy inject the sapphire then it inject the fletch. The fletch is mawkish.", "logic": "\nThousand(gipsy)\nGestural(gipsy)\nUnselected(gipsy)\nCaseous(gipsy)\nInject(gipsy, sapphire)\nInject(sapphire, gipsy)\nPrecede(fletch, sapphire)\nGestural(fletch)\nCaseous(fletch)\nInject(fletch, gipsy)\nPrecede(gipsy, sapphire) -> Precede(gipsy, fletch)\nforall x (Inject(x, sapphire) -> Unselected(x))\nVegetate(gipsy, sapphire) -> Vegetate(sapphire, fletch)\nforall x (Mawkish(x) and Inject(x, fletch) -> Vegetate(x, fletch))\nforall x (Precede(x, gipsy) -> Vegetate(x, gipsy))\nforall x (Precede(x, fletch) -> Vegetate(fletch, sapphire))\nforall x (Precede(x, sapphire) -> Inject(x, sapphire))\nforall x (Precede(x, gipsy) and Inject(gipsy, sapphire) -> Inject(x, fletch))\n\nMawkish(fletch)\n\nMawkish(fletch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The penni is delirious. The penni is bacillar. The penni is unremarked. The penni is seriocomic. The penni sack the beckie. The beckie sack the penni. The annetta cornice the beckie. The annetta is bacillar. The annetta is seriocomic. The annetta sack the penni. If the penni cornice the beckie then the penni cornice the annetta. If something sack the beckie then it is unremarked. If the penni blub the beckie then the beckie blub the annetta. If something is umptieth and it sack the annetta then it blub the annetta. If something cornice the penni then it blub the penni. If something cornice the annetta then the annetta blub the beckie. If something cornice the beckie then it sack the beckie. If something cornice the penni and the penni sack the beckie then it sack the annetta. The beckie is not bacillar.", "logic": "\nDelirious(penni)\nBacillar(penni)\nUnremarked(penni)\nSeriocomic(penni)\nSack(penni, beckie)\nSack(beckie, penni)\nCornice(annetta, beckie)\nBacillar(annetta)\nSeriocomic(annetta)\nSack(annetta, penni)\nCornice(penni, beckie) -> Cornice(penni, annetta)\nforall x (Sack(x, beckie) -> Unremarked(x))\nBlub(penni, beckie) -> Blub(beckie, annetta)\nforall x (Umptieth(x) and Sack(x, annetta) -> Blub(x, annetta))\nforall x (Cornice(x, penni) -> Blub(x, penni))\nforall x (Cornice(x, annetta) -> Blub(annetta, beckie))\nforall x (Cornice(x, beckie) -> Sack(x, beckie))\nforall x (Cornice(x, penni) and Sack(penni, beckie) -> Sack(x, annetta))\n\nnot Bacillar(beckie)\n\nnot Bacillar(beckie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The cheston is hieratic. The cheston is bigeneric. The cheston is unchained. The cheston is catchpenny. The cheston crimp the ammamaria. The ammamaria crimp the cheston. The rogers manure the ammamaria. The rogers is bigeneric. The rogers is catchpenny. The rogers crimp the cheston. If the cheston manure the ammamaria then the cheston manure the rogers. If something crimp the ammamaria then it is unchained. If the cheston sour the ammamaria then the ammamaria sour the rogers. If something is unlighted and it crimp the rogers then it sour the rogers. If something manure the cheston then it sour the cheston. If something manure the rogers then the rogers sour the ammamaria. If something manure the ammamaria then it crimp the ammamaria. If something manure the cheston and the cheston crimp the ammamaria then it crimp the rogers. The ammamaria manure the ammamaria.", "logic": "\nHieratic(cheston)\nBigeneric(cheston)\nUnchained(cheston)\nCatchpenny(cheston)\nCrimp(cheston, ammamaria)\nCrimp(ammamaria, cheston)\nManure(rogers, ammamaria)\nBigeneric(rogers)\nCatchpenny(rogers)\nCrimp(rogers, cheston)\nManure(cheston, ammamaria) -> Manure(cheston, rogers)\nforall x (Crimp(x, ammamaria) -> Unchained(x))\nSour(cheston, ammamaria) -> Sour(ammamaria, rogers)\nforall x (Unlighted(x) and Crimp(x, rogers) -> Sour(x, rogers))\nforall x (Manure(x, cheston) -> Sour(x, cheston))\nforall x (Manure(x, rogers) -> Sour(rogers, ammamaria))\nforall x (Manure(x, ammamaria) -> Crimp(x, ammamaria))\nforall x (Manure(x, cheston) and Crimp(cheston, ammamaria) -> Crimp(x, rogers))\n\nManure(ammamaria, ammamaria)\n\nManure(ammamaria, ammamaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "Olle is totemic. Olle is synergetic. Philip is purposeful. Philip is incipient. Pietra is incipient. Etti is saltlike. Etti is cognisant. Big people are totemic. If Pietra is incipient then Pietra is saltlike. If someone is totemic and not saltlike then they are cognisant. If someone is cognisant and not totemic then they are not purposeful. All cognisant, notched people are purposeful. Cold people are purposeful. Olle is synergetic.", "logic": "\nTotemic(olle)\nSynergetic(olle)\nPurposeful(philip)\nIncipient(philip)\nIncipient(pietra)\nSaltlike(etti)\nCognisant(etti)\nforall x (Saltlike(x) -> Totemic(x))\nIncipient(pietra) -> Saltlike(pietra)\nforall x (Totemic(x) and not Saltlike(x) -> Cognisant(x))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and not Totemic(x) -> not Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and Notched(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Totemic(x) -> Purposeful(x))\n\nSynergetic(olle)\n\ntherefore Synergetic(olle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Clayborn is assumptive. Clayborn is lively. Estel is hirsute. Estel is unloving. Emiline is unloving. Correna is scaleless. Correna is refreshing. Big people are assumptive. If Emiline is unloving then Emiline is scaleless. If someone is assumptive and not scaleless then they are refreshing. If someone is refreshing and not assumptive then they are not hirsute. All refreshing, gassy people are hirsute. Cold people are hirsute. Clayborn is not assumptive.", "logic": "\nAssumptive(clayborn)\nLively(clayborn)\nHirsute(estel)\nUnloving(estel)\nUnloving(emiline)\nScaleless(correna)\nRefreshing(correna)\nforall x (Scaleless(x) -> Assumptive(x))\nUnloving(emiline) -> Scaleless(emiline)\nforall x (Assumptive(x) and not Scaleless(x) -> Refreshing(x))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and not Assumptive(x) -> not Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and Gassy(x) -> Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) -> Hirsute(x))\n\nnot Assumptive(clayborn)\n\ntherefore Assumptive(clayborn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Wildon is operose. Wildon is youthful. Darth is prudential. Darth is educated. Dulci is educated. Collie is hadal. Collie is drinkable. Big people are operose. If Dulci is educated then Dulci is hadal. If someone is operose and not hadal then they are drinkable. If someone is drinkable and not operose then they are not prudential. All drinkable, resident people are prudential. Cold people are prudential. Dulci is hadal.", "logic": "\nOperose(wildon)\nYouthful(wildon)\nPrudential(darth)\nEducated(darth)\nEducated(dulci)\nHadal(collie)\nDrinkable(collie)\nforall x (Hadal(x) -> Operose(x))\nEducated(dulci) -> Hadal(dulci)\nforall x (Operose(x) and not Hadal(x) -> Drinkable(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and not Operose(x) -> not Prudential(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and Resident(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Prudential(x))\n\nHadal(dulci)\n\nEducated(dulci) and Educated(dulci) -> Hadal(dulci) -> therefore Hadal(dulci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Maribelle is peroneal. Maribelle is helminthic. Fanny is tantrik. Fanny is abuzz. Bessie is abuzz. Amata is sprawling. Amata is briery. Big people are peroneal. If Bessie is abuzz then Bessie is sprawling. If someone is peroneal and not sprawling then they are briery. If someone is briery and not peroneal then they are not tantrik. All briery, linnean people are tantrik. Cold people are tantrik. Bessie is not sprawling.", "logic": "\nPeroneal(maribelle)\nHelminthic(maribelle)\nTantrik(fanny)\nAbuzz(fanny)\nAbuzz(bessie)\nSprawling(amata)\nBriery(amata)\nforall x (Sprawling(x) -> Peroneal(x))\nAbuzz(bessie) -> Sprawling(bessie)\nforall x (Peroneal(x) and not Sprawling(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Briery(x) and not Peroneal(x) -> not Tantrik(x))\nforall x (Briery(x) and Linnean(x) -> Tantrik(x))\nforall x (Peroneal(x) -> Tantrik(x))\n\nnot Sprawling(bessie)\n\nAbuzz(bessie) and Abuzz(bessie) -> Sprawling(bessie) -> therefore Sprawling(bessie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Florance is laotian. Florance is flatulent. Marris is jerkwater. Marris is brawny. Arline is brawny. Ana is unforested. Ana is upfield. Big people are laotian. If Arline is brawny then Arline is unforested. If someone is laotian and not unforested then they are upfield. If someone is upfield and not laotian then they are not jerkwater. All upfield, played people are jerkwater. Cold people are jerkwater. Ana is jerkwater.", "logic": "\nLaotian(florance)\nFlatulent(florance)\nJerkwater(marris)\nBrawny(marris)\nBrawny(arline)\nUnforested(ana)\nUpfield(ana)\nforall x (Unforested(x) -> Laotian(x))\nBrawny(arline) -> Unforested(arline)\nforall x (Laotian(x) and not Unforested(x) -> Upfield(x))\nforall x (Upfield(x) and not Laotian(x) -> not Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Upfield(x) and Played(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Laotian(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\n\nJerkwater(ana)\n\nUnforested(ana) and forall x (Unforested(x) -> Laotian(x)) -> therefore Laotian(ana) Laotian(ana) and forall x (Laotian(x) -> Jerkwater(x)) -> therefore Jerkwater(ana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Hammad is novel. Hammad is glassless. Gen is heavenward. Gen is eupneic. Omar is eupneic. Darrell is dented. Darrell is treed. Big people are novel. If Omar is eupneic then Omar is dented. If someone is novel and not dented then they are treed. If someone is treed and not novel then they are not heavenward. All treed, wartlike people are heavenward. Cold people are heavenward. Omar is not novel.", "logic": "\nNovel(hammad)\nGlassless(hammad)\nHeavenward(gen)\nEupneic(gen)\nEupneic(omar)\nDented(darrell)\nTreed(darrell)\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Novel(x))\nEupneic(omar) -> Dented(omar)\nforall x (Novel(x) and not Dented(x) -> Treed(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) and not Novel(x) -> not Heavenward(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) and Wartlike(x) -> Heavenward(x))\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Heavenward(x))\n\nnot Novel(omar)\n\nEupneic(omar) and Eupneic(omar) -> Dented(omar) -> therefore Dented(omar) Dented(omar) and forall x (Dented(x) -> Novel(x)) -> therefore Novel(omar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Sile is insouciant. Sile is sectional. Vivian is exemplary. Vivian is chafflike. Katerina is chafflike. Estele is ecstatic. Estele is scrimy. Big people are insouciant. If Katerina is chafflike then Katerina is ecstatic. If someone is insouciant and not ecstatic then they are scrimy. If someone is scrimy and not insouciant then they are not exemplary. All scrimy, spanking people are exemplary. Cold people are exemplary. Sile is not scrimy.", "logic": "\nInsouciant(sile)\nSectional(sile)\nExemplary(vivian)\nChafflike(vivian)\nChafflike(katerina)\nEcstatic(estele)\nScrimy(estele)\nforall x (Ecstatic(x) -> Insouciant(x))\nChafflike(katerina) -> Ecstatic(katerina)\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and not Ecstatic(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) and not Insouciant(x) -> not Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) and Spanking(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) -> Exemplary(x))\n\nnot Scrimy(sile)\n\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and not Ecstatic(x) -> Scrimy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Kelcie is scrupulous. Kelcie is strait. Brinkley is entozoan. Brinkley is bedrid. Matt is bedrid. Dael is untaxed. Dael is pakistani. Big people are scrupulous. If Matt is bedrid then Matt is untaxed. If someone is scrupulous and not untaxed then they are pakistani. If someone is pakistani and not scrupulous then they are not entozoan. All pakistani, modular people are entozoan. Cold people are entozoan. Matt is pakistani.", "logic": "\nScrupulous(kelcie)\nStrait(kelcie)\nEntozoan(brinkley)\nBedrid(brinkley)\nBedrid(matt)\nUntaxed(dael)\nPakistani(dael)\nforall x (Untaxed(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nBedrid(matt) -> Untaxed(matt)\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and not Untaxed(x) -> Pakistani(x))\nforall x (Pakistani(x) and not Scrupulous(x) -> not Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Pakistani(x) and Modular(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Entozoan(x))\n\nPakistani(matt)\n\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and not Untaxed(x) -> Pakistani(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Teodorico is catalectic. Teodorico is salient. Mollee is xlviii. Mollee is heatable. Drew is heatable. Harrison is falsetto. Harrison is perceived. Big people are catalectic. If Drew is heatable then Drew is falsetto. If someone is catalectic and not falsetto then they are perceived. If someone is perceived and not catalectic then they are not xlviii. All perceived, unfledged people are xlviii. Cold people are xlviii. Mollee is not catalectic.", "logic": "\nCatalectic(teodorico)\nSalient(teodorico)\nXlviii(mollee)\nHeatable(mollee)\nHeatable(drew)\nFalsetto(harrison)\nPerceived(harrison)\nforall x (Falsetto(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nHeatable(drew) -> Falsetto(drew)\nforall x (Catalectic(x) and not Falsetto(x) -> Perceived(x))\nforall x (Perceived(x) and not Catalectic(x) -> not Xlviii(x))\nforall x (Perceived(x) and Unfledged(x) -> Xlviii(x))\nforall x (Catalectic(x) -> Xlviii(x))\n\nnot Catalectic(mollee)\n\nforall x (Falsetto(x) -> Catalectic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Bernhard is squamulose. Bernhard is content. Starr is monophonic. Starr is past. Marne is past. Quincey is motional. Quincey is unshackled. Big people are squamulose. If Marne is past then Marne is motional. If someone is squamulose and not motional then they are unshackled. If someone is unshackled and not squamulose then they are not monophonic. All unshackled, kookie people are monophonic. Cold people are monophonic. Marne is content.", "logic": "\nSquamulose(bernhard)\nContent(bernhard)\nMonophonic(starr)\nPast(starr)\nPast(marne)\nMotional(quincey)\nUnshackled(quincey)\nforall x (Motional(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nPast(marne) -> Motional(marne)\nforall x (Squamulose(x) and not Motional(x) -> Unshackled(x))\nforall x (Unshackled(x) and not Squamulose(x) -> not Monophonic(x))\nforall x (Unshackled(x) and Kookie(x) -> Monophonic(x))\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> Monophonic(x))\n\nContent(marne)\n\nContent(marne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Micki is chivalric. Micki is antipodean. Ware is bilobate. Ware is streetwise. Ronni is streetwise. Celestyn is addable. Celestyn is homespun. Big people are chivalric. If Ronni is streetwise then Ronni is addable. If someone is chivalric and not addable then they are homespun. If someone is homespun and not chivalric then they are not bilobate. All homespun, deadening people are bilobate. Cold people are bilobate. Celestyn is not antipodean.", "logic": "\nChivalric(micki)\nAntipodean(micki)\nBilobate(ware)\nStreetwise(ware)\nStreetwise(ronni)\nAddable(celestyn)\nHomespun(celestyn)\nforall x (Addable(x) -> Chivalric(x))\nStreetwise(ronni) -> Addable(ronni)\nforall x (Chivalric(x) and not Addable(x) -> Homespun(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) and not Chivalric(x) -> not Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) and Deadening(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Chivalric(x) -> Bilobate(x))\n\nnot Antipodean(celestyn)\n\nnot Antipodean(celestyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "Kiri is tonic. Kiri is corrupt. Madonna is parallel. Madonna is licenced. Eduard is licenced. Janka is blond. Janka is past. Big people are tonic. If Eduard is licenced then Eduard is blond. If someone is tonic and not blond then they are past. If someone is past and not tonic then they are not parallel. All past, convergent people are parallel. Cold people are parallel. Kiri is licenced.", "logic": "\nTonic(kiri)\nCorrupt(kiri)\nParallel(madonna)\nLicenced(madonna)\nLicenced(eduard)\nBlond(janka)\nPast(janka)\nforall x (Blond(x) -> Tonic(x))\nLicenced(eduard) -> Blond(eduard)\nforall x (Tonic(x) and not Blond(x) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Past(x) and not Tonic(x) -> not Parallel(x))\nforall x (Past(x) and Convergent(x) -> Parallel(x))\nforall x (Tonic(x) -> Parallel(x))\n\nLicenced(kiri)\n\nLicenced(kiri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The stillman limn the joyann. The joyann bobsled the harriett. The susanne is ceric. The harriett is handsewn. If someone is handsewn and they see the susanne then they eat the joyann. If someone limn the harriett then they eat the susanne. If someone bobsled the susanne and they see the susanne then they eat the joyann. If the susanne calcine the joyann and the joyann bobsled the susanne then the joyann calcine the stillman. If someone bobsled the harriett then the harriett limn the susanne. If the harriett limn the stillman then the stillman is handsewn. The stillman limn the joyann.", "logic": "\nLimn(stillman, joyann)\nBobsled(joyann, harriett)\nCeric(susanne)\nHandsewn(harriett)\nforall x (Handsewn(x) and Limn(x, susanne) -> Bobsled(x, joyann))\nforall x (Limn(x, harriett) -> Bobsled(x, susanne))\nforall x (Bobsled(x, susanne) and Limn(x, susanne) -> Bobsled(x, joyann))\nCalcine(susanne, joyann) and Bobsled(joyann, susanne) -> Calcine(joyann, stillman)\nforall x (Bobsled(x, harriett) -> Limn(harriett, susanne))\nLimn(harriett, stillman) -> Handsewn(stillman)\n\nLimn(stillman, joyann)\n\ntherefore Limn(stillman, joyann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The gavin garment the pryce. The pryce eradicate the sheff. The stevy is saltlike. The sheff is prosodic. If someone is prosodic and they see the stevy then they eat the pryce. If someone garment the sheff then they eat the stevy. If someone eradicate the stevy and they see the stevy then they eat the pryce. If the stevy disobey the pryce and the pryce eradicate the stevy then the pryce disobey the gavin. If someone eradicate the sheff then the sheff garment the stevy. If the sheff garment the gavin then the gavin is prosodic. The stevy is not saltlike.", "logic": "\nGarment(gavin, pryce)\nEradicate(pryce, sheff)\nSaltlike(stevy)\nProsodic(sheff)\nforall x (Prosodic(x) and Garment(x, stevy) -> Eradicate(x, pryce))\nforall x (Garment(x, sheff) -> Eradicate(x, stevy))\nforall x (Eradicate(x, stevy) and Garment(x, stevy) -> Eradicate(x, pryce))\nDisobey(stevy, pryce) and Eradicate(pryce, stevy) -> Disobey(pryce, gavin)\nforall x (Eradicate(x, sheff) -> Garment(sheff, stevy))\nGarment(sheff, gavin) -> Prosodic(gavin)\n\nnot Saltlike(stevy)\n\ntherefore Saltlike(stevy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The whitaker prearrange the hart. The hart deionize the beatrice. The michaella is ungainly. The beatrice is perversive. If someone is perversive and they see the michaella then they eat the hart. If someone prearrange the beatrice then they eat the michaella. If someone deionize the michaella and they see the michaella then they eat the hart. If the michaella bach the hart and the hart deionize the michaella then the hart bach the whitaker. If someone deionize the beatrice then the beatrice prearrange the michaella. If the beatrice prearrange the whitaker then the whitaker is perversive. The beatrice prearrange the michaella.", "logic": "\nPrearrange(whitaker, hart)\nDeionize(hart, beatrice)\nUngainly(michaella)\nPerversive(beatrice)\nforall x (Perversive(x) and Prearrange(x, michaella) -> Deionize(x, hart))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, beatrice) -> Deionize(x, michaella))\nforall x (Deionize(x, michaella) and Prearrange(x, michaella) -> Deionize(x, hart))\nBach(michaella, hart) and Deionize(hart, michaella) -> Bach(hart, whitaker)\nforall x (Deionize(x, beatrice) -> Prearrange(beatrice, michaella))\nPrearrange(beatrice, whitaker) -> Perversive(whitaker)\n\nPrearrange(beatrice, michaella)\n\nDeionize(hart, beatrice) and forall x (Deionize(x, beatrice) -> Prearrange(beatrice, michaella)) -> therefore Prearrange(beatrice, michaella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The charline infer the danni. The danni wallow the maressa. The hewett is ungallant. The maressa is habited. If someone is habited and they see the hewett then they eat the danni. If someone infer the maressa then they eat the hewett. If someone wallow the hewett and they see the hewett then they eat the danni. If the hewett avenge the danni and the danni wallow the hewett then the danni avenge the charline. If someone wallow the maressa then the maressa infer the hewett. If the maressa infer the charline then the charline is habited. The maressa does not see the hewett.", "logic": "\nInfer(charline, danni)\nWallow(danni, maressa)\nUngallant(hewett)\nHabited(maressa)\nforall x (Habited(x) and Infer(x, hewett) -> Wallow(x, danni))\nforall x (Infer(x, maressa) -> Wallow(x, hewett))\nforall x (Wallow(x, hewett) and Infer(x, hewett) -> Wallow(x, danni))\nAvenge(hewett, danni) and Wallow(danni, hewett) -> Avenge(danni, charline)\nforall x (Wallow(x, maressa) -> Infer(maressa, hewett))\nInfer(maressa, charline) -> Habited(charline)\n\nnot Infer(maressa, hewett)\n\nWallow(danni, maressa) and forall x (Wallow(x, maressa) -> Infer(maressa, hewett)) -> therefore Infer(maressa, hewett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The lotty instruct the myles. The myles terrorise the kirsten. The iolanthe is vivacious. The kirsten is minute. If someone is minute and they see the iolanthe then they eat the myles. If someone instruct the kirsten then they eat the iolanthe. If someone terrorise the iolanthe and they see the iolanthe then they eat the myles. If the iolanthe pinkify the myles and the myles terrorise the iolanthe then the myles pinkify the lotty. If someone terrorise the kirsten then the kirsten instruct the iolanthe. If the kirsten instruct the lotty then the lotty is minute. The kirsten terrorise the myles.", "logic": "\nInstruct(lotty, myles)\nTerrorise(myles, kirsten)\nVivacious(iolanthe)\nMinute(kirsten)\nforall x (Minute(x) and Instruct(x, iolanthe) -> Terrorise(x, myles))\nforall x (Instruct(x, kirsten) -> Terrorise(x, iolanthe))\nforall x (Terrorise(x, iolanthe) and Instruct(x, iolanthe) -> Terrorise(x, myles))\nPinkify(iolanthe, myles) and Terrorise(myles, iolanthe) -> Pinkify(myles, lotty)\nforall x (Terrorise(x, kirsten) -> Instruct(kirsten, iolanthe))\nInstruct(kirsten, lotty) -> Minute(lotty)\n\nTerrorise(kirsten, myles)\n\nTerrorise(myles, kirsten) and forall x (Terrorise(x, kirsten) -> Instruct(kirsten, iolanthe)) -> therefore Instruct(kirsten, iolanthe) Minute(kirsten) and Instruct(kirsten, iolanthe) and forall x (Minute(x) and Instruct(x, iolanthe) -> Terrorise(x, myles)) -> therefore Terrorise(kirsten, myles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The dewey foot the rozanne. The rozanne dehumanize the maurie. The enid is detested. The maurie is apart. If someone is apart and they see the enid then they eat the rozanne. If someone foot the maurie then they eat the enid. If someone dehumanize the enid and they see the enid then they eat the rozanne. If the enid silkscreen the rozanne and the rozanne dehumanize the enid then the rozanne silkscreen the dewey. If someone dehumanize the maurie then the maurie foot the enid. If the maurie foot the dewey then the dewey is apart. The maurie does not eat the rozanne.", "logic": "\nFoot(dewey, rozanne)\nDehumanize(rozanne, maurie)\nDetested(enid)\nApart(maurie)\nforall x (Apart(x) and Foot(x, enid) -> Dehumanize(x, rozanne))\nforall x (Foot(x, maurie) -> Dehumanize(x, enid))\nforall x (Dehumanize(x, enid) and Foot(x, enid) -> Dehumanize(x, rozanne))\nSilkscreen(enid, rozanne) and Dehumanize(rozanne, enid) -> Silkscreen(rozanne, dewey)\nforall x (Dehumanize(x, maurie) -> Foot(maurie, enid))\nFoot(maurie, dewey) -> Apart(dewey)\n\nnot Dehumanize(maurie, rozanne)\n\nDehumanize(rozanne, maurie) and forall x (Dehumanize(x, maurie) -> Foot(maurie, enid)) -> therefore Foot(maurie, enid) Apart(maurie) and Foot(maurie, enid) and forall x (Apart(x) and Foot(x, enid) -> Dehumanize(x, rozanne)) -> therefore Dehumanize(maurie, rozanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The kristina encounter the donella. The donella impanel the alica. The thedric is flavourful. The alica is fanlike. If someone is fanlike and they see the thedric then they eat the donella. If someone encounter the alica then they eat the thedric. If someone impanel the thedric and they see the thedric then they eat the donella. If the thedric retrogress the donella and the donella impanel the thedric then the donella retrogress the kristina. If someone impanel the alica then the alica encounter the thedric. If the alica encounter the kristina then the kristina is fanlike. The kristina does not eat the donella.", "logic": "\nEncounter(kristina, donella)\nImpanel(donella, alica)\nFlavourful(thedric)\nFanlike(alica)\nforall x (Fanlike(x) and Encounter(x, thedric) -> Impanel(x, donella))\nforall x (Encounter(x, alica) -> Impanel(x, thedric))\nforall x (Impanel(x, thedric) and Encounter(x, thedric) -> Impanel(x, donella))\nRetrogress(thedric, donella) and Impanel(donella, thedric) -> Retrogress(donella, kristina)\nforall x (Impanel(x, alica) -> Encounter(alica, thedric))\nEncounter(alica, kristina) -> Fanlike(kristina)\n\nnot Impanel(kristina, donella)\n\nforall x (Fanlike(x) and Encounter(x, thedric) -> Impanel(x, donella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The didi hatchel the alaa. The alaa dillydally the arly. The gunner is barebacked. The arly is untrusty. If someone is untrusty and they see the gunner then they eat the alaa. If someone hatchel the arly then they eat the gunner. If someone dillydally the gunner and they see the gunner then they eat the alaa. If the gunner jellify the alaa and the alaa dillydally the gunner then the alaa jellify the didi. If someone dillydally the arly then the arly hatchel the gunner. If the arly hatchel the didi then the didi is untrusty. The didi is untrusty.", "logic": "\nHatchel(didi, alaa)\nDillydally(alaa, arly)\nBarebacked(gunner)\nUntrusty(arly)\nforall x (Untrusty(x) and Hatchel(x, gunner) -> Dillydally(x, alaa))\nforall x (Hatchel(x, arly) -> Dillydally(x, gunner))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, gunner) and Hatchel(x, gunner) -> Dillydally(x, alaa))\nJellify(gunner, alaa) and Dillydally(alaa, gunner) -> Jellify(alaa, didi)\nforall x (Dillydally(x, arly) -> Hatchel(arly, gunner))\nHatchel(arly, didi) -> Untrusty(didi)\n\nUntrusty(didi)\n\nHatchel(arly, didi) -> Untrusty(didi) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The clemence overcook the salome. The salome flummox the johnny. The george is struck. The johnny is sanious. If someone is sanious and they see the george then they eat the salome. If someone overcook the johnny then they eat the george. If someone flummox the george and they see the george then they eat the salome. If the george peddle the salome and the salome flummox the george then the salome peddle the clemence. If someone flummox the johnny then the johnny overcook the george. If the johnny overcook the clemence then the clemence is sanious. The clemence does not eat the george.", "logic": "\nOvercook(clemence, salome)\nFlummox(salome, johnny)\nStruck(george)\nSanious(johnny)\nforall x (Sanious(x) and Overcook(x, george) -> Flummox(x, salome))\nforall x (Overcook(x, johnny) -> Flummox(x, george))\nforall x (Flummox(x, george) and Overcook(x, george) -> Flummox(x, salome))\nPeddle(george, salome) and Flummox(salome, george) -> Peddle(salome, clemence)\nforall x (Flummox(x, johnny) -> Overcook(johnny, george))\nOvercook(johnny, clemence) -> Sanious(clemence)\n\nnot Flummox(clemence, george)\n\nforall x (Overcook(x, johnny) -> Flummox(x, george)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The sherwood scrawl the charin. The charin neighbor the pansie. The anders is sideways. The pansie is modal. If someone is modal and they see the anders then they eat the charin. If someone scrawl the pansie then they eat the anders. If someone neighbor the anders and they see the anders then they eat the charin. If the anders inspire the charin and the charin neighbor the anders then the charin inspire the sherwood. If someone neighbor the pansie then the pansie scrawl the anders. If the pansie scrawl the sherwood then the sherwood is modal. The anders is cold.", "logic": "\nScrawl(sherwood, charin)\nNeighbor(charin, pansie)\nSideways(anders)\nModal(pansie)\nforall x (Modal(x) and Scrawl(x, anders) -> Neighbor(x, charin))\nforall x (Scrawl(x, pansie) -> Neighbor(x, anders))\nforall x (Neighbor(x, anders) and Scrawl(x, anders) -> Neighbor(x, charin))\nInspire(anders, charin) and Neighbor(charin, anders) -> Inspire(charin, sherwood)\nforall x (Neighbor(x, pansie) -> Scrawl(pansie, anders))\nScrawl(pansie, sherwood) -> Modal(sherwood)\n\nCold(anders)\n\nCold(anders) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The aharon blockade the eustace. The eustace cark the ferd. The channa is kokka. The ferd is lowest. If someone is lowest and they see the channa then they eat the eustace. If someone blockade the ferd then they eat the channa. If someone cark the channa and they see the channa then they eat the eustace. If the channa seal the eustace and the eustace cark the channa then the eustace seal the aharon. If someone cark the ferd then the ferd blockade the channa. If the ferd blockade the aharon then the aharon is lowest. The eustace does not chase the eustace.", "logic": "\nBlockade(aharon, eustace)\nCark(eustace, ferd)\nKokka(channa)\nLowest(ferd)\nforall x (Lowest(x) and Blockade(x, channa) -> Cark(x, eustace))\nforall x (Blockade(x, ferd) -> Cark(x, channa))\nforall x (Cark(x, channa) and Blockade(x, channa) -> Cark(x, eustace))\nSeal(channa, eustace) and Cark(eustace, channa) -> Seal(eustace, aharon)\nforall x (Cark(x, ferd) -> Blockade(ferd, channa))\nBlockade(ferd, aharon) -> Lowest(aharon)\n\nnot Seal(eustace, eustace)\n\nnot Seal(eustace, eustace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The milka comb the flint. The flint jell the heinz. The tiana is uncurved. The heinz is xcvii. If someone is xcvii and they see the tiana then they eat the flint. If someone comb the heinz then they eat the tiana. If someone jell the tiana and they see the tiana then they eat the flint. If the tiana clapboard the flint and the flint jell the tiana then the flint clapboard the milka. If someone jell the heinz then the heinz comb the tiana. If the heinz comb the milka then the milka is xcvii. The heinz clapboard the tiana.", "logic": "\nComb(milka, flint)\nJell(flint, heinz)\nUncurved(tiana)\nXcvii(heinz)\nforall x (Xcvii(x) and Comb(x, tiana) -> Jell(x, flint))\nforall x (Comb(x, heinz) -> Jell(x, tiana))\nforall x (Jell(x, tiana) and Comb(x, tiana) -> Jell(x, flint))\nClapboard(tiana, flint) and Jell(flint, tiana) -> Clapboard(flint, milka)\nforall x (Jell(x, heinz) -> Comb(heinz, tiana))\nComb(heinz, milka) -> Xcvii(milka)\n\nClapboard(heinz, tiana)\n\nClapboard(heinz, tiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-770"} {"premises": "The clotilda plash the marabel. The clotilda is not chilean. The clotilda is not powdered. The clotilda is bedridden. The clotilda is august. The clotilda does not like the marabel. The clotilda splice the marabel. The marabel plash the clotilda. The marabel is chilean. The marabel is powdered. The marabel is bedridden. The marabel is polytonal. The marabel is august. The marabel hasten the clotilda. The marabel splice the clotilda. If someone plash the marabel then they see the marabel. If someone is chilean then they chase the marabel. If someone hasten the marabel then the marabel plash the clotilda. The clotilda splice the marabel.", "logic": "\nPlash(clotilda, marabel)\nnot Chilean(clotilda)\nnot Powdered(clotilda)\nBedridden(clotilda)\nAugust(clotilda)\nnot Hasten(clotilda, marabel)\nSplice(clotilda, marabel)\nPlash(marabel, clotilda)\nChilean(marabel)\nPowdered(marabel)\nBedridden(marabel)\nPolytonal(marabel)\nAugust(marabel)\nHasten(marabel, clotilda)\nSplice(marabel, clotilda)\nforall x (Plash(x, marabel) -> Splice(x, marabel))\nforall x (Chilean(x) -> Plash(x, marabel))\nforall x (Hasten(x, marabel) -> Plash(marabel, clotilda))\n\nSplice(clotilda, marabel)\n\ntherefore Splice(clotilda, marabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The noelani yack the edsel. The noelani is not pendent. The noelani is not mousey. The noelani is ironshod. The noelani is observed. The noelani does not like the edsel. The noelani bootlick the edsel. The edsel yack the noelani. The edsel is pendent. The edsel is mousey. The edsel is ironshod. The edsel is ptolemaic. The edsel is observed. The edsel gradate the noelani. The edsel bootlick the noelani. If someone yack the edsel then they see the edsel. If someone is pendent then they chase the edsel. If someone gradate the edsel then the edsel yack the noelani. The edsel is not pendent.", "logic": "\nYack(noelani, edsel)\nnot Pendent(noelani)\nnot Mousey(noelani)\nIronshod(noelani)\nObserved(noelani)\nnot Gradate(noelani, edsel)\nBootlick(noelani, edsel)\nYack(edsel, noelani)\nPendent(edsel)\nMousey(edsel)\nIronshod(edsel)\nPtolemaic(edsel)\nObserved(edsel)\nGradate(edsel, noelani)\nBootlick(edsel, noelani)\nforall x (Yack(x, edsel) -> Bootlick(x, edsel))\nforall x (Pendent(x) -> Yack(x, edsel))\nforall x (Gradate(x, edsel) -> Yack(edsel, noelani))\n\nnot Pendent(edsel)\n\ntherefore Pendent(edsel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The kathlene perfect the mathilda. The kathlene is not majestic. The kathlene is not flickering. The kathlene is racial. The kathlene is gelded. The kathlene does not like the mathilda. The kathlene reevaluate the mathilda. The mathilda perfect the kathlene. The mathilda is majestic. The mathilda is flickering. The mathilda is racial. The mathilda is gauche. The mathilda is gelded. The mathilda care the kathlene. The mathilda reevaluate the kathlene. If someone perfect the mathilda then they see the mathilda. If someone is majestic then they chase the mathilda. If someone care the mathilda then the mathilda perfect the kathlene. The mathilda perfect the mathilda.", "logic": "\nPerfect(kathlene, mathilda)\nnot Majestic(kathlene)\nnot Flickering(kathlene)\nRacial(kathlene)\nGelded(kathlene)\nnot Care(kathlene, mathilda)\nReevaluate(kathlene, mathilda)\nPerfect(mathilda, kathlene)\nMajestic(mathilda)\nFlickering(mathilda)\nRacial(mathilda)\nGauche(mathilda)\nGelded(mathilda)\nCare(mathilda, kathlene)\nReevaluate(mathilda, kathlene)\nforall x (Perfect(x, mathilda) -> Reevaluate(x, mathilda))\nforall x (Majestic(x) -> Perfect(x, mathilda))\nforall x (Care(x, mathilda) -> Perfect(mathilda, kathlene))\n\nPerfect(mathilda, mathilda)\n\nMajestic(mathilda) and forall x (Majestic(x) -> Perfect(x, mathilda)) -> therefore Perfect(mathilda, mathilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The udall whir the suzanna. The udall is not weightless. The udall is not unrivaled. The udall is fastigiate. The udall is cryptical. The udall does not like the suzanna. The udall quarry the suzanna. The suzanna whir the udall. The suzanna is weightless. The suzanna is unrivaled. The suzanna is fastigiate. The suzanna is probable. The suzanna is cryptical. The suzanna sleigh the udall. The suzanna quarry the udall. If someone whir the suzanna then they see the suzanna. If someone is weightless then they chase the suzanna. If someone sleigh the suzanna then the suzanna whir the udall. The suzanna does not chase the suzanna.", "logic": "\nWhir(udall, suzanna)\nnot Weightless(udall)\nnot Unrivaled(udall)\nFastigiate(udall)\nCryptical(udall)\nnot Sleigh(udall, suzanna)\nQuarry(udall, suzanna)\nWhir(suzanna, udall)\nWeightless(suzanna)\nUnrivaled(suzanna)\nFastigiate(suzanna)\nProbable(suzanna)\nCryptical(suzanna)\nSleigh(suzanna, udall)\nQuarry(suzanna, udall)\nforall x (Whir(x, suzanna) -> Quarry(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Weightless(x) -> Whir(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Sleigh(x, suzanna) -> Whir(suzanna, udall))\n\nnot Whir(suzanna, suzanna)\n\nWeightless(suzanna) and forall x (Weightless(x) -> Whir(x, suzanna)) -> therefore Whir(suzanna, suzanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The alexandra critique the ephram. The alexandra is not colonial. The alexandra is not excusatory. The alexandra is unremarked. The alexandra is scabrous. The alexandra does not like the ephram. The alexandra retaliate the ephram. The ephram critique the alexandra. The ephram is colonial. The ephram is excusatory. The ephram is unremarked. The ephram is elect. The ephram is scabrous. The ephram pose the alexandra. The ephram retaliate the alexandra. If someone critique the ephram then they see the ephram. If someone is colonial then they chase the ephram. If someone pose the ephram then the ephram critique the alexandra. The ephram retaliate the ephram.", "logic": "\nCritique(alexandra, ephram)\nnot Colonial(alexandra)\nnot Excusatory(alexandra)\nUnremarked(alexandra)\nScabrous(alexandra)\nnot Pose(alexandra, ephram)\nRetaliate(alexandra, ephram)\nCritique(ephram, alexandra)\nColonial(ephram)\nExcusatory(ephram)\nUnremarked(ephram)\nElect(ephram)\nScabrous(ephram)\nPose(ephram, alexandra)\nRetaliate(ephram, alexandra)\nforall x (Critique(x, ephram) -> Retaliate(x, ephram))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Critique(x, ephram))\nforall x (Pose(x, ephram) -> Critique(ephram, alexandra))\n\nRetaliate(ephram, ephram)\n\nColonial(ephram) and forall x (Colonial(x) -> Critique(x, ephram)) -> therefore Critique(ephram, ephram) Critique(ephram, ephram) and forall x (Critique(x, ephram) -> Retaliate(x, ephram)) -> therefore Retaliate(ephram, ephram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The querida empurple the laurie. The querida is not filarial. The querida is not gassy. The querida is throaty. The querida is unaerated. The querida does not like the laurie. The querida clarify the laurie. The laurie empurple the querida. The laurie is filarial. The laurie is gassy. The laurie is throaty. The laurie is trusty. The laurie is unaerated. The laurie sentence the querida. The laurie clarify the querida. If someone empurple the laurie then they see the laurie. If someone is filarial then they chase the laurie. If someone sentence the laurie then the laurie empurple the querida. The laurie does not see the laurie.", "logic": "\nEmpurple(querida, laurie)\nnot Filarial(querida)\nnot Gassy(querida)\nThroaty(querida)\nUnaerated(querida)\nnot Sentence(querida, laurie)\nClarify(querida, laurie)\nEmpurple(laurie, querida)\nFilarial(laurie)\nGassy(laurie)\nThroaty(laurie)\nTrusty(laurie)\nUnaerated(laurie)\nSentence(laurie, querida)\nClarify(laurie, querida)\nforall x (Empurple(x, laurie) -> Clarify(x, laurie))\nforall x (Filarial(x) -> Empurple(x, laurie))\nforall x (Sentence(x, laurie) -> Empurple(laurie, querida))\n\nnot Clarify(laurie, laurie)\n\nFilarial(laurie) and forall x (Filarial(x) -> Empurple(x, laurie)) -> therefore Empurple(laurie, laurie) Empurple(laurie, laurie) and forall x (Empurple(x, laurie) -> Clarify(x, laurie)) -> therefore Clarify(laurie, laurie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The kalman flash the augie. The kalman is not clubable. The kalman is not rabid. The kalman is untoasted. The kalman is aerobic. The kalman does not like the augie. The kalman cooccur the augie. The augie flash the kalman. The augie is clubable. The augie is rabid. The augie is untoasted. The augie is gowned. The augie is aerobic. The augie chicane the kalman. The augie cooccur the kalman. If someone flash the augie then they see the augie. If someone is clubable then they chase the augie. If someone chicane the augie then the augie flash the kalman. The kalman does not like the kalman.", "logic": "\nFlash(kalman, augie)\nnot Clubable(kalman)\nnot Rabid(kalman)\nUntoasted(kalman)\nAerobic(kalman)\nnot Chicane(kalman, augie)\nCooccur(kalman, augie)\nFlash(augie, kalman)\nClubable(augie)\nRabid(augie)\nUntoasted(augie)\nGowned(augie)\nAerobic(augie)\nChicane(augie, kalman)\nCooccur(augie, kalman)\nforall x (Flash(x, augie) -> Cooccur(x, augie))\nforall x (Clubable(x) -> Flash(x, augie))\nforall x (Chicane(x, augie) -> Flash(augie, kalman))\n\nnot Chicane(kalman, kalman)\n\nnot Chicane(kalman, kalman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The corrinne spite the storey. The corrinne is not shaven. The corrinne is not comburent. The corrinne is chockful. The corrinne is unparallel. The corrinne does not like the storey. The corrinne slash the storey. The storey spite the corrinne. The storey is shaven. The storey is comburent. The storey is chockful. The storey is noted. The storey is unparallel. The storey prawn the corrinne. The storey slash the corrinne. If someone spite the storey then they see the storey. If someone is shaven then they chase the storey. If someone prawn the storey then the storey spite the corrinne. The corrinne is noted.", "logic": "\nSpite(corrinne, storey)\nnot Shaven(corrinne)\nnot Comburent(corrinne)\nChockful(corrinne)\nUnparallel(corrinne)\nnot Prawn(corrinne, storey)\nSlash(corrinne, storey)\nSpite(storey, corrinne)\nShaven(storey)\nComburent(storey)\nChockful(storey)\nNoted(storey)\nUnparallel(storey)\nPrawn(storey, corrinne)\nSlash(storey, corrinne)\nforall x (Spite(x, storey) -> Slash(x, storey))\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Spite(x, storey))\nforall x (Prawn(x, storey) -> Spite(storey, corrinne))\n\nNoted(corrinne)\n\nNoted(corrinne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The deonne volatilise the adele. The deonne is not polemic. The deonne is not gaussian. The deonne is tense. The deonne is farming. The deonne does not like the adele. The deonne deaminize the adele. The adele volatilise the deonne. The adele is polemic. The adele is gaussian. The adele is tense. The adele is retro. The adele is farming. The adele stir the deonne. The adele deaminize the deonne. If someone volatilise the adele then they see the adele. If someone is polemic then they chase the adele. If someone stir the adele then the adele volatilise the deonne. The deonne does not chase the deonne.", "logic": "\nVolatilise(deonne, adele)\nnot Polemic(deonne)\nnot Gaussian(deonne)\nTense(deonne)\nFarming(deonne)\nnot Stir(deonne, adele)\nDeaminize(deonne, adele)\nVolatilise(adele, deonne)\nPolemic(adele)\nGaussian(adele)\nTense(adele)\nRetro(adele)\nFarming(adele)\nStir(adele, deonne)\nDeaminize(adele, deonne)\nforall x (Volatilise(x, adele) -> Deaminize(x, adele))\nforall x (Polemic(x) -> Volatilise(x, adele))\nforall x (Stir(x, adele) -> Volatilise(adele, deonne))\n\nnot Volatilise(deonne, deonne)\n\nnot Volatilise(deonne, deonne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The rowland sanction the danni. The rowland is not egyptian. The rowland is not unpeopled. The rowland is drugged. The rowland is plumlike. The rowland does not like the danni. The rowland craft the danni. The danni sanction the rowland. The danni is egyptian. The danni is unpeopled. The danni is drugged. The danni is lonesome. The danni is plumlike. The danni reopen the rowland. The danni craft the rowland. If someone sanction the danni then they see the danni. If someone is egyptian then they chase the danni. If someone reopen the danni then the danni sanction the rowland. The danni reopen the danni.", "logic": "\nSanction(rowland, danni)\nnot Egyptian(rowland)\nnot Unpeopled(rowland)\nDrugged(rowland)\nPlumlike(rowland)\nnot Reopen(rowland, danni)\nCraft(rowland, danni)\nSanction(danni, rowland)\nEgyptian(danni)\nUnpeopled(danni)\nDrugged(danni)\nLonesome(danni)\nPlumlike(danni)\nReopen(danni, rowland)\nCraft(danni, rowland)\nforall x (Sanction(x, danni) -> Craft(x, danni))\nforall x (Egyptian(x) -> Sanction(x, danni))\nforall x (Reopen(x, danni) -> Sanction(danni, rowland))\n\nReopen(danni, danni)\n\nReopen(danni, danni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "Staffard is overfond. Staffard is unisexual. Staffard is rural. Staffard is horrific. Staffard is cuspidal. Dorette is arborical. Dorette is unisexual. Dorette is indebted. Dorette is cuspidal. Bonni is arborical. Bonni is overfond. Bonni is unisexual. Bonni is indebted. Bonni is rural. Bonni is cuspidal. If Staffard is cuspidal and Staffard is arborical then Staffard is indebted. White, cuspidal things are arborical. Bonni is cuspidal.", "logic": "\nOverfond(staffard)\nUnisexual(staffard)\nRural(staffard)\nHorrific(staffard)\nCuspidal(staffard)\nArborical(dorette)\nUnisexual(dorette)\nIndebted(dorette)\nCuspidal(dorette)\nArborical(bonni)\nOverfond(bonni)\nUnisexual(bonni)\nIndebted(bonni)\nRural(bonni)\nCuspidal(bonni)\nCuspidal(staffard) and Arborical(staffard) -> Indebted(staffard)\nforall x (Horrific(x) and Cuspidal(x) -> Arborical(x))\n\nCuspidal(bonni)\n\ntherefore Cuspidal(bonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Christian is unsheathed. Christian is unkind. Christian is unoiled. Christian is uricosuric. Christian is beamish. Hedvig is righteous. Hedvig is unkind. Hedvig is rose. Hedvig is beamish. Bren is righteous. Bren is unsheathed. Bren is unkind. Bren is rose. Bren is unoiled. Bren is beamish. If Christian is beamish and Christian is righteous then Christian is rose. White, beamish things are righteous. Bren is not righteous.", "logic": "\nUnsheathed(christian)\nUnkind(christian)\nUnoiled(christian)\nUricosuric(christian)\nBeamish(christian)\nRighteous(hedvig)\nUnkind(hedvig)\nRose(hedvig)\nBeamish(hedvig)\nRighteous(bren)\nUnsheathed(bren)\nUnkind(bren)\nRose(bren)\nUnoiled(bren)\nBeamish(bren)\nBeamish(christian) and Righteous(christian) -> Rose(christian)\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) and Beamish(x) -> Righteous(x))\n\nnot Righteous(bren)\n\ntherefore Righteous(bren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Jemie is autoicous. Jemie is sleeveless. Jemie is avellan. Jemie is passee. Jemie is artificial. Kimberlyn is astounded. Kimberlyn is sleeveless. Kimberlyn is spavined. Kimberlyn is artificial. Esma is astounded. Esma is autoicous. Esma is sleeveless. Esma is spavined. Esma is avellan. Esma is artificial. If Jemie is artificial and Jemie is astounded then Jemie is spavined. White, artificial things are astounded. Jemie is astounded.", "logic": "\nAutoicous(jemie)\nSleeveless(jemie)\nAvellan(jemie)\nPassee(jemie)\nArtificial(jemie)\nAstounded(kimberlyn)\nSleeveless(kimberlyn)\nSpavined(kimberlyn)\nArtificial(kimberlyn)\nAstounded(esma)\nAutoicous(esma)\nSleeveless(esma)\nSpavined(esma)\nAvellan(esma)\nArtificial(esma)\nArtificial(jemie) and Astounded(jemie) -> Spavined(jemie)\nforall x (Passee(x) and Artificial(x) -> Astounded(x))\n\nAstounded(jemie)\n\nPassee(jemie) and Artificial(jemie) and forall x (Passee(x) and Artificial(x) -> Astounded(x)) -> therefore Astounded(jemie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Frannie is pronged. Frannie is asserted. Frannie is fivefold. Frannie is unsleeping. Frannie is ternary. Bridie is classy. Bridie is asserted. Bridie is extreme. Bridie is ternary. Cecile is classy. Cecile is pronged. Cecile is asserted. Cecile is extreme. Cecile is fivefold. Cecile is ternary. If Frannie is ternary and Frannie is classy then Frannie is extreme. White, ternary things are classy. Frannie is not classy.", "logic": "\nPronged(frannie)\nAsserted(frannie)\nFivefold(frannie)\nUnsleeping(frannie)\nTernary(frannie)\nClassy(bridie)\nAsserted(bridie)\nExtreme(bridie)\nTernary(bridie)\nClassy(cecile)\nPronged(cecile)\nAsserted(cecile)\nExtreme(cecile)\nFivefold(cecile)\nTernary(cecile)\nTernary(frannie) and Classy(frannie) -> Extreme(frannie)\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) and Ternary(x) -> Classy(x))\n\nnot Classy(frannie)\n\nUnsleeping(frannie) and Ternary(frannie) and forall x (Unsleeping(x) and Ternary(x) -> Classy(x)) -> therefore Classy(frannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Delphinia is limpid. Delphinia is capacious. Delphinia is crowning. Delphinia is buirdly. Delphinia is untasted. Corabel is tailed. Corabel is capacious. Corabel is roundabout. Corabel is untasted. Trevar is tailed. Trevar is limpid. Trevar is capacious. Trevar is roundabout. Trevar is crowning. Trevar is untasted. If Delphinia is untasted and Delphinia is tailed then Delphinia is roundabout. White, untasted things are tailed. Delphinia is roundabout.", "logic": "\nLimpid(delphinia)\nCapacious(delphinia)\nCrowning(delphinia)\nBuirdly(delphinia)\nUntasted(delphinia)\nTailed(corabel)\nCapacious(corabel)\nRoundabout(corabel)\nUntasted(corabel)\nTailed(trevar)\nLimpid(trevar)\nCapacious(trevar)\nRoundabout(trevar)\nCrowning(trevar)\nUntasted(trevar)\nUntasted(delphinia) and Tailed(delphinia) -> Roundabout(delphinia)\nforall x (Buirdly(x) and Untasted(x) -> Tailed(x))\n\nRoundabout(delphinia)\n\nBuirdly(delphinia) and Untasted(delphinia) and forall x (Buirdly(x) and Untasted(x) -> Tailed(x)) -> therefore Tailed(delphinia) Untasted(delphinia) and Tailed(delphinia) and Untasted(delphinia) and Tailed(delphinia) -> Roundabout(delphinia) -> therefore Roundabout(delphinia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Trish is hewn. Trish is warning. Trish is centric. Trish is mauritian. Trish is postpartum. Junina is retractile. Junina is warning. Junina is sulfurous. Junina is postpartum. Tiff is retractile. Tiff is hewn. Tiff is warning. Tiff is sulfurous. Tiff is centric. Tiff is postpartum. If Trish is postpartum and Trish is retractile then Trish is sulfurous. White, postpartum things are retractile. Trish is not sulfurous.", "logic": "\nHewn(trish)\nWarning(trish)\nCentric(trish)\nMauritian(trish)\nPostpartum(trish)\nRetractile(junina)\nWarning(junina)\nSulfurous(junina)\nPostpartum(junina)\nRetractile(tiff)\nHewn(tiff)\nWarning(tiff)\nSulfurous(tiff)\nCentric(tiff)\nPostpartum(tiff)\nPostpartum(trish) and Retractile(trish) -> Sulfurous(trish)\nforall x (Mauritian(x) and Postpartum(x) -> Retractile(x))\n\nnot Sulfurous(trish)\n\nMauritian(trish) and Postpartum(trish) and forall x (Mauritian(x) and Postpartum(x) -> Retractile(x)) -> therefore Retractile(trish) Postpartum(trish) and Retractile(trish) and Postpartum(trish) and Retractile(trish) -> Sulfurous(trish) -> therefore Sulfurous(trish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Milly is unparented. Milly is aground. Milly is columnlike. Milly is chilly. Milly is shitty. Coleman is tinselly. Coleman is aground. Coleman is subliminal. Coleman is shitty. Berte is tinselly. Berte is unparented. Berte is aground. Berte is subliminal. Berte is columnlike. Berte is shitty. If Milly is shitty and Milly is tinselly then Milly is subliminal. White, shitty things are tinselly. Coleman is not columnlike.", "logic": "\nUnparented(milly)\nAground(milly)\nColumnlike(milly)\nChilly(milly)\nShitty(milly)\nTinselly(coleman)\nAground(coleman)\nSubliminal(coleman)\nShitty(coleman)\nTinselly(berte)\nUnparented(berte)\nAground(berte)\nSubliminal(berte)\nColumnlike(berte)\nShitty(berte)\nShitty(milly) and Tinselly(milly) -> Subliminal(milly)\nforall x (Chilly(x) and Shitty(x) -> Tinselly(x))\n\nnot Columnlike(coleman)\n\nnot Columnlike(coleman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Samuella is lacking. Samuella is rimed. Samuella is expositive. Samuella is numeral. Samuella is ostensive. Maiga is boreal. Maiga is rimed. Maiga is multiplex. Maiga is ostensive. Elle is boreal. Elle is lacking. Elle is rimed. Elle is multiplex. Elle is expositive. Elle is ostensive. If Samuella is ostensive and Samuella is boreal then Samuella is multiplex. White, ostensive things are boreal. Elle is numeral.", "logic": "\nLacking(samuella)\nRimed(samuella)\nExpositive(samuella)\nNumeral(samuella)\nOstensive(samuella)\nBoreal(maiga)\nRimed(maiga)\nMultiplex(maiga)\nOstensive(maiga)\nBoreal(elle)\nLacking(elle)\nRimed(elle)\nMultiplex(elle)\nExpositive(elle)\nOstensive(elle)\nOstensive(samuella) and Boreal(samuella) -> Multiplex(samuella)\nforall x (Numeral(x) and Ostensive(x) -> Boreal(x))\n\nNumeral(elle)\n\nNumeral(elle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Gusta is sedentary. Gusta is boon. Gusta is tactless. Gusta is european. Gusta is booked. Armand is discalced. Armand is boon. Armand is flowerless. Armand is booked. Cathryn is discalced. Cathryn is sedentary. Cathryn is boon. Cathryn is flowerless. Cathryn is tactless. Cathryn is booked. If Gusta is booked and Gusta is discalced then Gusta is flowerless. White, booked things are discalced. Armand is not sedentary.", "logic": "\nSedentary(gusta)\nBoon(gusta)\nTactless(gusta)\nEuropean(gusta)\nBooked(gusta)\nDiscalced(armand)\nBoon(armand)\nFlowerless(armand)\nBooked(armand)\nDiscalced(cathryn)\nSedentary(cathryn)\nBoon(cathryn)\nFlowerless(cathryn)\nTactless(cathryn)\nBooked(cathryn)\nBooked(gusta) and Discalced(gusta) -> Flowerless(gusta)\nforall x (European(x) and Booked(x) -> Discalced(x))\n\nnot Sedentary(armand)\n\nnot Sedentary(armand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "Gabbey is autumnal. Gabbey is terrified. Gabbey is referent. Gabbey is bonkers. Gabbey is flagrant. Essa is eery. Essa is terrified. Essa is sanguinary. Essa is flagrant. Athena is eery. Athena is autumnal. Athena is terrified. Athena is sanguinary. Athena is referent. Athena is flagrant. If Gabbey is flagrant and Gabbey is eery then Gabbey is sanguinary. White, flagrant things are eery. Essa is bonkers.", "logic": "\nAutumnal(gabbey)\nTerrified(gabbey)\nReferent(gabbey)\nBonkers(gabbey)\nFlagrant(gabbey)\nEery(essa)\nTerrified(essa)\nSanguinary(essa)\nFlagrant(essa)\nEery(athena)\nAutumnal(athena)\nTerrified(athena)\nSanguinary(athena)\nReferent(athena)\nFlagrant(athena)\nFlagrant(gabbey) and Eery(gabbey) -> Sanguinary(gabbey)\nforall x (Bonkers(x) and Flagrant(x) -> Eery(x))\n\nBonkers(essa)\n\nBonkers(essa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-723"} {"premises": "The christel hiccough the ephrem. The christel is propellent. The christel french the ephrem. The christel overdress the ephrem. The ephrem hiccough the christel. The ephrem is sorbed. The ephrem does not need the christel. If someone french the ephrem then the ephrem is musty. If someone is musty then they eat the ephrem. If someone french the christel and they do not visit the christel then the christel does not visit the ephrem. The christel is propellent.", "logic": "\nHiccough(christel, ephrem)\nPropellent(christel)\nFrench(christel, ephrem)\nOverdress(christel, ephrem)\nHiccough(ephrem, christel)\nSorbed(ephrem)\nnot French(ephrem, christel)\nforall x (French(x, ephrem) -> Musty(ephrem))\nforall x (Musty(x) -> Hiccough(x, ephrem))\nforall x (French(x, christel) and not Overdress(x, christel) -> not Overdress(christel, ephrem))\n\nPropellent(christel)\n\ntherefore Propellent(christel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The dorthy undrape the ainslee. The dorthy is cauline. The dorthy regale the ainslee. The dorthy census the ainslee. The ainslee undrape the dorthy. The ainslee is bicentric. The ainslee does not need the dorthy. If someone regale the ainslee then the ainslee is unexciting. If someone is unexciting then they eat the ainslee. If someone regale the dorthy and they do not visit the dorthy then the dorthy does not visit the ainslee. The ainslee is not bicentric.", "logic": "\nUndrape(dorthy, ainslee)\nCauline(dorthy)\nRegale(dorthy, ainslee)\nCensus(dorthy, ainslee)\nUndrape(ainslee, dorthy)\nBicentric(ainslee)\nnot Regale(ainslee, dorthy)\nforall x (Regale(x, ainslee) -> Unexciting(ainslee))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) -> Undrape(x, ainslee))\nforall x (Regale(x, dorthy) and not Census(x, dorthy) -> not Census(dorthy, ainslee))\n\nnot Bicentric(ainslee)\n\ntherefore Bicentric(ainslee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The rodina tiller the gerhard. The rodina is removed. The rodina outwear the gerhard. The rodina zoom the gerhard. The gerhard tiller the rodina. The gerhard is umptieth. The gerhard does not need the rodina. If someone outwear the gerhard then the gerhard is sighted. If someone is sighted then they eat the gerhard. If someone outwear the rodina and they do not visit the rodina then the rodina does not visit the gerhard. The gerhard is sighted.", "logic": "\nTiller(rodina, gerhard)\nRemoved(rodina)\nOutwear(rodina, gerhard)\nZoom(rodina, gerhard)\nTiller(gerhard, rodina)\nUmptieth(gerhard)\nnot Outwear(gerhard, rodina)\nforall x (Outwear(x, gerhard) -> Sighted(gerhard))\nforall x (Sighted(x) -> Tiller(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Outwear(x, rodina) and not Zoom(x, rodina) -> not Zoom(rodina, gerhard))\n\nSighted(gerhard)\n\nOutwear(rodina, gerhard) and forall x (Outwear(x, gerhard) -> Sighted(gerhard)) -> therefore Sighted(gerhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The charles scranch the silvester. The charles is uncivil. The charles disobey the silvester. The charles piece the silvester. The silvester scranch the charles. The silvester is resonant. The silvester does not need the charles. If someone disobey the silvester then the silvester is compounded. If someone is compounded then they eat the silvester. If someone disobey the charles and they do not visit the charles then the charles does not visit the silvester. The silvester is not compounded.", "logic": "\nScranch(charles, silvester)\nUncivil(charles)\nDisobey(charles, silvester)\nPiece(charles, silvester)\nScranch(silvester, charles)\nResonant(silvester)\nnot Disobey(silvester, charles)\nforall x (Disobey(x, silvester) -> Compounded(silvester))\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> Scranch(x, silvester))\nforall x (Disobey(x, charles) and not Piece(x, charles) -> not Piece(charles, silvester))\n\nnot Compounded(silvester)\n\nDisobey(charles, silvester) and forall x (Disobey(x, silvester) -> Compounded(silvester)) -> therefore Compounded(silvester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The ford leather the wilone. The ford is ophthalmic. The ford refund the wilone. The ford supplicate the wilone. The wilone leather the ford. The wilone is inflexible. The wilone does not need the ford. If someone refund the wilone then the wilone is walloping. If someone is walloping then they eat the wilone. If someone refund the ford and they do not visit the ford then the ford does not visit the wilone. The wilone leather the wilone.", "logic": "\nLeather(ford, wilone)\nOphthalmic(ford)\nRefund(ford, wilone)\nSupplicate(ford, wilone)\nLeather(wilone, ford)\nInflexible(wilone)\nnot Refund(wilone, ford)\nforall x (Refund(x, wilone) -> Walloping(wilone))\nforall x (Walloping(x) -> Leather(x, wilone))\nforall x (Refund(x, ford) and not Supplicate(x, ford) -> not Supplicate(ford, wilone))\n\nLeather(wilone, wilone)\n\nRefund(ford, wilone) and forall x (Refund(x, wilone) -> Walloping(wilone)) -> therefore Walloping(wilone) Walloping(wilone) and forall x (Walloping(x) -> Leather(x, wilone)) -> therefore Leather(wilone, wilone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The magna engage the emmanuel. The magna is unranked. The magna uniform the emmanuel. The magna whelk the emmanuel. The emmanuel engage the magna. The emmanuel is shrieked. The emmanuel does not need the magna. If someone uniform the emmanuel then the emmanuel is guyanese. If someone is guyanese then they eat the emmanuel. If someone uniform the magna and they do not visit the magna then the magna does not visit the emmanuel. The emmanuel does not eat the emmanuel.", "logic": "\nEngage(magna, emmanuel)\nUnranked(magna)\nUniform(magna, emmanuel)\nWhelk(magna, emmanuel)\nEngage(emmanuel, magna)\nShrieked(emmanuel)\nnot Uniform(emmanuel, magna)\nforall x (Uniform(x, emmanuel) -> Guyanese(emmanuel))\nforall x (Guyanese(x) -> Engage(x, emmanuel))\nforall x (Uniform(x, magna) and not Whelk(x, magna) -> not Whelk(magna, emmanuel))\n\nnot Engage(emmanuel, emmanuel)\n\nUniform(magna, emmanuel) and forall x (Uniform(x, emmanuel) -> Guyanese(emmanuel)) -> therefore Guyanese(emmanuel) Guyanese(emmanuel) and forall x (Guyanese(x) -> Engage(x, emmanuel)) -> therefore Engage(emmanuel, emmanuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The jerold hydrate the trix. The jerold is casuistic. The jerold stopper the trix. The jerold liquidize the trix. The trix hydrate the jerold. The trix is pert. The trix does not need the jerold. If someone stopper the trix then the trix is truncated. If someone is truncated then they eat the trix. If someone stopper the jerold and they do not visit the jerold then the jerold does not visit the trix. The jerold does not visit the jerold.", "logic": "\nHydrate(jerold, trix)\nCasuistic(jerold)\nStopper(jerold, trix)\nLiquidize(jerold, trix)\nHydrate(trix, jerold)\nPert(trix)\nnot Stopper(trix, jerold)\nforall x (Stopper(x, trix) -> Truncated(trix))\nforall x (Truncated(x) -> Hydrate(x, trix))\nforall x (Stopper(x, jerold) and not Liquidize(x, jerold) -> not Liquidize(jerold, trix))\n\nnot Liquidize(jerold, jerold)\n\nnot Liquidize(jerold, jerold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The kenneth cone the morlee. The kenneth is bumpy. The kenneth suction the morlee. The kenneth leash the morlee. The morlee cone the kenneth. The morlee is fatalist. The morlee does not need the kenneth. If someone suction the morlee then the morlee is apparent. If someone is apparent then they eat the morlee. If someone suction the kenneth and they do not visit the kenneth then the kenneth does not visit the morlee. The morlee suction the morlee.", "logic": "\nCone(kenneth, morlee)\nBumpy(kenneth)\nSuction(kenneth, morlee)\nLeash(kenneth, morlee)\nCone(morlee, kenneth)\nFatalist(morlee)\nnot Suction(morlee, kenneth)\nforall x (Suction(x, morlee) -> Apparent(morlee))\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Cone(x, morlee))\nforall x (Suction(x, kenneth) and not Leash(x, kenneth) -> not Leash(kenneth, morlee))\n\nSuction(morlee, morlee)\n\nSuction(morlee, morlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The ediva overstock the barbra. The ediva is svelte. The ediva placate the barbra. The ediva trice the barbra. The barbra overstock the ediva. The barbra is driving. The barbra does not need the ediva. If someone placate the barbra then the barbra is bismuthal. If someone is bismuthal then they eat the barbra. If someone placate the ediva and they do not visit the ediva then the ediva does not visit the barbra. The barbra is not svelte.", "logic": "\nOverstock(ediva, barbra)\nSvelte(ediva)\nPlacate(ediva, barbra)\nTrice(ediva, barbra)\nOverstock(barbra, ediva)\nDriving(barbra)\nnot Placate(barbra, ediva)\nforall x (Placate(x, barbra) -> Bismuthal(barbra))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) -> Overstock(x, barbra))\nforall x (Placate(x, ediva) and not Trice(x, ediva) -> not Trice(ediva, barbra))\n\nnot Svelte(barbra)\n\nnot Svelte(barbra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The desaree film the nadiya. The desaree is premium. The desaree concede the nadiya. The desaree empower the nadiya. The nadiya film the desaree. The nadiya is reasoning. The nadiya does not need the desaree. If someone concede the nadiya then the nadiya is ocher. If someone is ocher then they eat the nadiya. If someone concede the desaree and they do not visit the desaree then the desaree does not visit the nadiya. The nadiya is cold.", "logic": "\nFilm(desaree, nadiya)\nPremium(desaree)\nConcede(desaree, nadiya)\nEmpower(desaree, nadiya)\nFilm(nadiya, desaree)\nReasoning(nadiya)\nnot Concede(nadiya, desaree)\nforall x (Concede(x, nadiya) -> Ocher(nadiya))\nforall x (Ocher(x) -> Film(x, nadiya))\nforall x (Concede(x, desaree) and not Empower(x, desaree) -> not Empower(desaree, nadiya))\n\nCold(nadiya)\n\nCold(nadiya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The georgena microfilm the tim. The georgena is cushioned. The georgena foul the tim. The georgena manicure the tim. The tim microfilm the georgena. The tim is cheering. The tim does not need the georgena. If someone foul the tim then the tim is aerated. If someone is aerated then they eat the tim. If someone foul the georgena and they do not visit the georgena then the georgena does not visit the tim. The georgena does not need the georgena.", "logic": "\nMicrofilm(georgena, tim)\nCushioned(georgena)\nFoul(georgena, tim)\nManicure(georgena, tim)\nMicrofilm(tim, georgena)\nCheering(tim)\nnot Foul(tim, georgena)\nforall x (Foul(x, tim) -> Aerated(tim))\nforall x (Aerated(x) -> Microfilm(x, tim))\nforall x (Foul(x, georgena) and not Manicure(x, georgena) -> not Manicure(georgena, tim))\n\nnot Foul(georgena, georgena)\n\nnot Foul(georgena, georgena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "The flori levitate the maurene. The flori is branching. The flori disband the maurene. The flori prattle the maurene. The maurene levitate the flori. The maurene is harnessed. The maurene does not need the flori. If someone disband the maurene then the maurene is blase. If someone is blase then they eat the maurene. If someone disband the flori and they do not visit the flori then the flori does not visit the maurene. The flori is blase.", "logic": "\nLevitate(flori, maurene)\nBranching(flori)\nDisband(flori, maurene)\nPrattle(flori, maurene)\nLevitate(maurene, flori)\nHarnessed(maurene)\nnot Disband(maurene, flori)\nforall x (Disband(x, maurene) -> Blase(maurene))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Levitate(x, maurene))\nforall x (Disband(x, flori) and not Prattle(x, flori) -> not Prattle(flori, maurene))\n\nBlase(flori)\n\nBlase(flori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Marven is biddable. Johnny is not avocado. Jessee is agonadal. Victoria is fiendish. Kind things are nonvisual. If something is fiendish then it is avocado. Victoria is fiendish.", "logic": "\nBiddable(marven)\nnot Avocado(johnny)\nAgonadal(jessee)\nFiendish(victoria)\nforall x (Avocado(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\nforall x (Fiendish(x) -> Avocado(x))\n\nFiendish(victoria)\n\ntherefore Fiendish(victoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Suellen is refulgent. Lindy is not semilunar. Raye is scrimy. Ansley is acrid. Kind things are extreme. If something is acrid then it is semilunar. Raye is not scrimy.", "logic": "\nRefulgent(suellen)\nnot Semilunar(lindy)\nScrimy(raye)\nAcrid(ansley)\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Extreme(x))\nforall x (Acrid(x) -> Semilunar(x))\n\nnot Scrimy(raye)\n\ntherefore Scrimy(raye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Simonette is torpid. Aurilia is not absorbing. Hetty is commensal. Lynna is axenic. Kind things are fleecy. If something is axenic then it is absorbing. Lynna is absorbing.", "logic": "\nTorpid(simonette)\nnot Absorbing(aurilia)\nCommensal(hetty)\nAxenic(lynna)\nforall x (Absorbing(x) -> Fleecy(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) -> Absorbing(x))\n\nAbsorbing(lynna)\n\nAxenic(lynna) and forall x (Axenic(x) -> Absorbing(x)) -> therefore Absorbing(lynna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Ruthanne is satisfying. Berty is not guiding. Jobi is afeard. Nels is assistant. Kind things are biovular. If something is assistant then it is guiding. Nels is not guiding.", "logic": "\nSatisfying(ruthanne)\nnot Guiding(berty)\nAfeard(jobi)\nAssistant(nels)\nforall x (Guiding(x) -> Biovular(x))\nforall x (Assistant(x) -> Guiding(x))\n\nnot Guiding(nels)\n\nAssistant(nels) and forall x (Assistant(x) -> Guiding(x)) -> therefore Guiding(nels)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Selene is magical. Tre is not gaga. Stanislaw is oafish. Tildie is summery. Kind things are axenic. If something is summery then it is gaga. Tildie is axenic.", "logic": "\nMagical(selene)\nnot Gaga(tre)\nOafish(stanislaw)\nSummery(tildie)\nforall x (Gaga(x) -> Axenic(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Gaga(x))\n\nAxenic(tildie)\n\nSummery(tildie) and forall x (Summery(x) -> Gaga(x)) -> therefore Gaga(tildie) Gaga(tildie) and forall x (Gaga(x) -> Axenic(x)) -> therefore Axenic(tildie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Shamit is grasping. Tyson is not extirpable. Bennie is egoistical. Galen is braced. Kind things are knockdown. If something is braced then it is extirpable. Galen is not knockdown.", "logic": "\nGrasping(shamit)\nnot Extirpable(tyson)\nEgoistical(bennie)\nBraced(galen)\nforall x (Extirpable(x) -> Knockdown(x))\nforall x (Braced(x) -> Extirpable(x))\n\nnot Knockdown(galen)\n\nBraced(galen) and forall x (Braced(x) -> Extirpable(x)) -> therefore Extirpable(galen) Extirpable(galen) and forall x (Extirpable(x) -> Knockdown(x)) -> therefore Knockdown(galen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Demetra is logistical. Mignonne is not extrinsic. Charlton is bouffant. Emmery is wrapped. Kind things are peppy. If something is wrapped then it is extrinsic. Demetra is not peppy.", "logic": "\nLogistical(demetra)\nnot Extrinsic(mignonne)\nBouffant(charlton)\nWrapped(emmery)\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\n\nnot Peppy(demetra)\n\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Peppy(x)) <- forall x (Wrapped(x) -> Extrinsic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Nico is weensy. Ravil is not dirt. Oliver is ohmic. Ahmed is cheeky. Kind things are almighty. If something is cheeky then it is dirt. Nico is dirt.", "logic": "\nWeensy(nico)\nnot Dirt(ravil)\nOhmic(oliver)\nCheeky(ahmed)\nforall x (Dirt(x) -> Almighty(x))\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> Dirt(x))\n\nDirt(nico)\n\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> Dirt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Prentiss is phoenician. Dew is not bordered. Linnea is phylliform. Vania is unawed. Kind things are untouched. If something is unawed then it is bordered. Linnea is not bordered.", "logic": "\nPhoenician(prentiss)\nnot Bordered(dew)\nPhylliform(linnea)\nUnawed(vania)\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Untouched(x))\nforall x (Unawed(x) -> Bordered(x))\n\nnot Bordered(linnea)\n\nforall x (Unawed(x) -> Bordered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Merna is ventilated. Andromeda is not unbarreled. Jany is eccrine. Nathanil is smoked. Kind things are cranky. If something is smoked then it is unbarreled. Andromeda is smoked.", "logic": "\nVentilated(merna)\nnot Unbarreled(andromeda)\nEccrine(jany)\nSmoked(nathanil)\nforall x (Unbarreled(x) -> Cranky(x))\nforall x (Smoked(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\n\nSmoked(andromeda)\n\nSmoked(andromeda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Harman is airless. Lottie is not strained. Meara is malarial. Lyndon is effete. Kind things are fattish. If something is effete then it is strained. Meara is not round.", "logic": "\nAirless(harman)\nnot Strained(lottie)\nMalarial(meara)\nEffete(lyndon)\nforall x (Strained(x) -> Fattish(x))\nforall x (Effete(x) -> Strained(x))\n\nnot Round(meara)\n\nnot Round(meara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "Mame is eleventh. Boyd is not unspoilt. Gerry is orange. Selene is imperious. Kind things are xlviii. If something is imperious then it is unspoilt. Selene is eleventh.", "logic": "\nEleventh(mame)\nnot Unspoilt(boyd)\nOrange(gerry)\nImperious(selene)\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) -> Xlviii(x))\nforall x (Imperious(x) -> Unspoilt(x))\n\nEleventh(selene)\n\nEleventh(selene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The alyce does not eat the jordy. The hashim is fitting. The jordy quack the hashim. The cynthea is not primo. If something is fencelike then it quack the hashim. If something insinuate the hashim and it is pussy then it is fencelike. If something is primo then it is fencelike. If the cynthea is fencelike and the cynthea does not eat the alyce then the cynthea quack the jordy. If something is fitting then it is primo. If something quack the cynthea and the cynthea is primo then the cynthea spotlight the jordy. The alyce does not eat the jordy.", "logic": "\nnot Spotlight(alyce, jordy)\nFitting(hashim)\nQuack(jordy, hashim)\nnot Primo(cynthea)\nforall x (Fencelike(x) -> Quack(x, hashim))\nforall x (Insinuate(x, hashim) and Pussy(x) -> Fencelike(x))\nforall x (Primo(x) -> Fencelike(x))\nFencelike(cynthea) and not Spotlight(cynthea, alyce) -> Quack(cynthea, jordy)\nforall x (Fitting(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Quack(x, cynthea) and Primo(cynthea) -> Spotlight(cynthea, jordy))\n\nnot Spotlight(alyce, jordy)\n\ntherefore not Spotlight(alyce, jordy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The darleen does not eat the terrance. The winthrop is infrared. The terrance delay the winthrop. The dyana is not retrorse. If something is collective then it delay the winthrop. If something grumble the winthrop and it is myalgic then it is collective. If something is retrorse then it is collective. If the dyana is collective and the dyana does not eat the darleen then the dyana delay the terrance. If something is infrared then it is retrorse. If something delay the dyana and the dyana is retrorse then the dyana chuckle the terrance. The terrance does not need the winthrop.", "logic": "\nnot Chuckle(darleen, terrance)\nInfrared(winthrop)\nDelay(terrance, winthrop)\nnot Retrorse(dyana)\nforall x (Collective(x) -> Delay(x, winthrop))\nforall x (Grumble(x, winthrop) and Myalgic(x) -> Collective(x))\nforall x (Retrorse(x) -> Collective(x))\nCollective(dyana) and not Chuckle(dyana, darleen) -> Delay(dyana, terrance)\nforall x (Infrared(x) -> Retrorse(x))\nforall x (Delay(x, dyana) and Retrorse(dyana) -> Chuckle(dyana, terrance))\n\nnot Delay(terrance, winthrop)\n\ntherefore Delay(terrance, winthrop)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The scotti does not eat the bealle. The dode is appalling. The bealle devaluate the dode. The benjy is not autarkic. If something is arch then it devaluate the dode. If something enmesh the dode and it is funerary then it is arch. If something is autarkic then it is arch. If the benjy is arch and the benjy does not eat the scotti then the benjy devaluate the bealle. If something is appalling then it is autarkic. If something devaluate the benjy and the benjy is autarkic then the benjy disperse the bealle. The dode is autarkic.", "logic": "\nnot Disperse(scotti, bealle)\nAppalling(dode)\nDevaluate(bealle, dode)\nnot Autarkic(benjy)\nforall x (Arch(x) -> Devaluate(x, dode))\nforall x (Enmesh(x, dode) and Funerary(x) -> Arch(x))\nforall x (Autarkic(x) -> Arch(x))\nArch(benjy) and not Disperse(benjy, scotti) -> Devaluate(benjy, bealle)\nforall x (Appalling(x) -> Autarkic(x))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, benjy) and Autarkic(benjy) -> Disperse(benjy, bealle))\n\nAutarkic(dode)\n\nAppalling(dode) and forall x (Appalling(x) -> Autarkic(x)) -> therefore Autarkic(dode)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The dody does not eat the thea. The lorry is overweight. The thea dissent the lorry. The marin is not scholastic. If something is nonpublic then it dissent the lorry. If something appreciate the lorry and it is wakeful then it is nonpublic. If something is scholastic then it is nonpublic. If the marin is nonpublic and the marin does not eat the dody then the marin dissent the thea. If something is overweight then it is scholastic. If something dissent the marin and the marin is scholastic then the marin creep the thea. The lorry is not scholastic.", "logic": "\nnot Creep(dody, thea)\nOverweight(lorry)\nDissent(thea, lorry)\nnot Scholastic(marin)\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Dissent(x, lorry))\nforall x (Appreciate(x, lorry) and Wakeful(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\nNonpublic(marin) and not Creep(marin, dody) -> Dissent(marin, thea)\nforall x (Overweight(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Dissent(x, marin) and Scholastic(marin) -> Creep(marin, thea))\n\nnot Scholastic(lorry)\n\nOverweight(lorry) and forall x (Overweight(x) -> Scholastic(x)) -> therefore Scholastic(lorry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The willetta does not eat the ronna. The halette is unabridged. The ronna experience the halette. The smith is not rhymed. If something is blurred then it experience the halette. If something broadside the halette and it is synovial then it is blurred. If something is rhymed then it is blurred. If the smith is blurred and the smith does not eat the willetta then the smith experience the ronna. If something is unabridged then it is rhymed. If something experience the smith and the smith is rhymed then the smith lighter the ronna. The halette is blurred.", "logic": "\nnot Lighter(willetta, ronna)\nUnabridged(halette)\nExperience(ronna, halette)\nnot Rhymed(smith)\nforall x (Blurred(x) -> Experience(x, halette))\nforall x (Broadside(x, halette) and Synovial(x) -> Blurred(x))\nforall x (Rhymed(x) -> Blurred(x))\nBlurred(smith) and not Lighter(smith, willetta) -> Experience(smith, ronna)\nforall x (Unabridged(x) -> Rhymed(x))\nforall x (Experience(x, smith) and Rhymed(smith) -> Lighter(smith, ronna))\n\nBlurred(halette)\n\nUnabridged(halette) and forall x (Unabridged(x) -> Rhymed(x)) -> therefore Rhymed(halette) Rhymed(halette) and forall x (Rhymed(x) -> Blurred(x)) -> therefore Blurred(halette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The zsazsa does not eat the elnora. The elizabet is plumose. The elnora platinize the elizabet. The audre is not dendriform. If something is iffy then it platinize the elizabet. If something blabber the elizabet and it is metalloid then it is iffy. If something is dendriform then it is iffy. If the audre is iffy and the audre does not eat the zsazsa then the audre platinize the elnora. If something is plumose then it is dendriform. If something platinize the audre and the audre is dendriform then the audre flatter the elnora. The elizabet is not iffy.", "logic": "\nnot Flatter(zsazsa, elnora)\nPlumose(elizabet)\nPlatinize(elnora, elizabet)\nnot Dendriform(audre)\nforall x (Iffy(x) -> Platinize(x, elizabet))\nforall x (Blabber(x, elizabet) and Metalloid(x) -> Iffy(x))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) -> Iffy(x))\nIffy(audre) and not Flatter(audre, zsazsa) -> Platinize(audre, elnora)\nforall x (Plumose(x) -> Dendriform(x))\nforall x (Platinize(x, audre) and Dendriform(audre) -> Flatter(audre, elnora))\n\nnot Iffy(elizabet)\n\nPlumose(elizabet) and forall x (Plumose(x) -> Dendriform(x)) -> therefore Dendriform(elizabet) Dendriform(elizabet) and forall x (Dendriform(x) -> Iffy(x)) -> therefore Iffy(elizabet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The ollie does not eat the helise. The zak is well. The helise build the zak. The carlie is not maculate. If something is goateed then it build the zak. If something sprawl the zak and it is exhaustive then it is goateed. If something is maculate then it is goateed. If the carlie is goateed and the carlie does not eat the ollie then the carlie build the helise. If something is well then it is maculate. If something build the carlie and the carlie is maculate then the carlie negative the helise. The ollie does not need the zak.", "logic": "\nnot Negative(ollie, helise)\nWell(zak)\nBuild(helise, zak)\nnot Maculate(carlie)\nforall x (Goateed(x) -> Build(x, zak))\nforall x (Sprawl(x, zak) and Exhaustive(x) -> Goateed(x))\nforall x (Maculate(x) -> Goateed(x))\nGoateed(carlie) and not Negative(carlie, ollie) -> Build(carlie, helise)\nforall x (Well(x) -> Maculate(x))\nforall x (Build(x, carlie) and Maculate(carlie) -> Negative(carlie, helise))\n\nnot Build(ollie, zak)\n\nforall x (Goateed(x) -> Build(x, zak)) <- forall x (Maculate(x) -> Goateed(x)) <- forall x (Well(x) -> Maculate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The bernice does not eat the teodora. The gusta is startling. The teodora barbarise the gusta. The aubrie is not gilt. If something is monopteral then it barbarise the gusta. If something unhook the gusta and it is untapped then it is monopteral. If something is gilt then it is monopteral. If the aubrie is monopteral and the aubrie does not eat the bernice then the aubrie barbarise the teodora. If something is startling then it is gilt. If something barbarise the aubrie and the aubrie is gilt then the aubrie spring the teodora. The aubrie barbarise the gusta.", "logic": "\nnot Spring(bernice, teodora)\nStartling(gusta)\nBarbarise(teodora, gusta)\nnot Gilt(aubrie)\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> Barbarise(x, gusta))\nforall x (Unhook(x, gusta) and Untapped(x) -> Monopteral(x))\nforall x (Gilt(x) -> Monopteral(x))\nMonopteral(aubrie) and not Spring(aubrie, bernice) -> Barbarise(aubrie, teodora)\nforall x (Startling(x) -> Gilt(x))\nforall x (Barbarise(x, aubrie) and Gilt(aubrie) -> Spring(aubrie, teodora))\n\nBarbarise(aubrie, gusta)\n\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> Barbarise(x, gusta)) <- forall x (Unhook(x, gusta) and Untapped(x) -> Monopteral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The kassia does not eat the bert. The ian is chiasmic. The bert vesiculate the ian. The zena is not transitory. If something is nodular then it vesiculate the ian. If something gaol the ian and it is knightly then it is nodular. If something is transitory then it is nodular. If the zena is nodular and the zena does not eat the kassia then the zena vesiculate the bert. If something is chiasmic then it is transitory. If something vesiculate the zena and the zena is transitory then the zena pine the bert. The bert is not nodular.", "logic": "\nnot Pine(kassia, bert)\nChiasmic(ian)\nVesiculate(bert, ian)\nnot Transitory(zena)\nforall x (Nodular(x) -> Vesiculate(x, ian))\nforall x (Gaol(x, ian) and Knightly(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Nodular(x))\nNodular(zena) and not Pine(zena, kassia) -> Vesiculate(zena, bert)\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, zena) and Transitory(zena) -> Pine(zena, bert))\n\nnot Nodular(bert)\n\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Nodular(x)) <- forall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Transitory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The vern does not eat the xaviera. The ardella is glad. The xaviera foreshadow the ardella. The armando is not agnate. If something is noted then it foreshadow the ardella. If something disforest the ardella and it is aperiodic then it is noted. If something is agnate then it is noted. If the armando is noted and the armando does not eat the vern then the armando foreshadow the xaviera. If something is glad then it is agnate. If something foreshadow the armando and the armando is agnate then the armando bowl the xaviera. The xaviera bowl the vern.", "logic": "\nnot Bowl(vern, xaviera)\nGlad(ardella)\nForeshadow(xaviera, ardella)\nnot Agnate(armando)\nforall x (Noted(x) -> Foreshadow(x, ardella))\nforall x (Disforest(x, ardella) and Aperiodic(x) -> Noted(x))\nforall x (Agnate(x) -> Noted(x))\nNoted(armando) and not Bowl(armando, vern) -> Foreshadow(armando, xaviera)\nforall x (Glad(x) -> Agnate(x))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, armando) and Agnate(armando) -> Bowl(armando, xaviera))\n\nBowl(xaviera, vern)\n\nBowl(xaviera, vern) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The priscilla does not eat the solomon. The pauline is almighty. The solomon ballyrag the pauline. The stanleigh is not ergodic. If something is telescoped then it ballyrag the pauline. If something feign the pauline and it is surging then it is telescoped. If something is ergodic then it is telescoped. If the stanleigh is telescoped and the stanleigh does not eat the priscilla then the stanleigh ballyrag the solomon. If something is almighty then it is ergodic. If something ballyrag the stanleigh and the stanleigh is ergodic then the stanleigh course the solomon. The pauline does not eat the solomon.", "logic": "\nnot Course(priscilla, solomon)\nAlmighty(pauline)\nBallyrag(solomon, pauline)\nnot Ergodic(stanleigh)\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Ballyrag(x, pauline))\nforall x (Feign(x, pauline) and Surging(x) -> Telescoped(x))\nforall x (Ergodic(x) -> Telescoped(x))\nTelescoped(stanleigh) and not Course(stanleigh, priscilla) -> Ballyrag(stanleigh, solomon)\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Ergodic(x))\nforall x (Ballyrag(x, stanleigh) and Ergodic(stanleigh) -> Course(stanleigh, solomon))\n\nnot Course(pauline, solomon)\n\nnot Course(pauline, solomon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The siouxie does not eat the morlee. The clo is teetotal. The morlee tender the clo. The armando is not nautical. If something is superhuman then it tender the clo. If something fuel the clo and it is dioecious then it is superhuman. If something is nautical then it is superhuman. If the armando is superhuman and the armando does not eat the siouxie then the armando tender the morlee. If something is teetotal then it is nautical. If something tender the armando and the armando is nautical then the armando repair the morlee. The clo repair the clo.", "logic": "\nnot Repair(siouxie, morlee)\nTeetotal(clo)\nTender(morlee, clo)\nnot Nautical(armando)\nforall x (Superhuman(x) -> Tender(x, clo))\nforall x (Fuel(x, clo) and Dioecious(x) -> Superhuman(x))\nforall x (Nautical(x) -> Superhuman(x))\nSuperhuman(armando) and not Repair(armando, siouxie) -> Tender(armando, morlee)\nforall x (Teetotal(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Tender(x, armando) and Nautical(armando) -> Repair(armando, morlee))\n\nRepair(clo, clo)\n\nRepair(clo, clo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-954"} {"premises": "The jessalin pride the thalia. The thalia pride the renata. The dorette does not see the jessalin. The renata jilt the thalia. If something jilt the thalia then the thalia is attainable. If the thalia is attainable then the thalia is not customary. If something is abortive and customary then it is attainable. The thalia pride the renata.", "logic": "\nPride(jessalin, thalia)\nPride(thalia, renata)\nnot Pride(dorette, jessalin)\nJilt(renata, thalia)\nforall x (Jilt(x, thalia) -> Attainable(thalia))\nAttainable(thalia) -> not Customary(thalia)\nforall x (Abortive(x) and Customary(x) -> Attainable(x))\n\nPride(thalia, renata)\n\ntherefore Pride(thalia, renata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The dorelia foreknow the bea. The bea foreknow the brandise. The fenelia does not see the dorelia. The brandise conquer the bea. If something conquer the bea then the bea is iodised. If the bea is iodised then the bea is not chewable. If something is meshuga and chewable then it is iodised. The brandise does not eat the bea.", "logic": "\nForeknow(dorelia, bea)\nForeknow(bea, brandise)\nnot Foreknow(fenelia, dorelia)\nConquer(brandise, bea)\nforall x (Conquer(x, bea) -> Iodised(bea))\nIodised(bea) -> not Chewable(bea)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) and Chewable(x) -> Iodised(x))\n\nnot Conquer(brandise, bea)\n\ntherefore Conquer(brandise, bea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The brear bespatter the jaine. The jaine bespatter the debbie. The breanne does not see the brear. The debbie burn the jaine. If something burn the jaine then the jaine is hereditary. If the jaine is hereditary then the jaine is not fairish. If something is pressed and fairish then it is hereditary. The jaine is hereditary.", "logic": "\nBespatter(brear, jaine)\nBespatter(jaine, debbie)\nnot Bespatter(breanne, brear)\nBurn(debbie, jaine)\nforall x (Burn(x, jaine) -> Hereditary(jaine))\nHereditary(jaine) -> not Fairish(jaine)\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Fairish(x) -> Hereditary(x))\n\nHereditary(jaine)\n\nBurn(debbie, jaine) and forall x (Burn(x, jaine) -> Hereditary(jaine)) -> therefore Hereditary(jaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The hyatt reverse the pete. The pete reverse the violetta. The ivette does not see the hyatt. The violetta backslide the pete. If something backslide the pete then the pete is untouched. If the pete is untouched then the pete is not allegretto. If something is kinglike and allegretto then it is untouched. The pete is not untouched.", "logic": "\nReverse(hyatt, pete)\nReverse(pete, violetta)\nnot Reverse(ivette, hyatt)\nBackslide(violetta, pete)\nforall x (Backslide(x, pete) -> Untouched(pete))\nUntouched(pete) -> not Allegretto(pete)\nforall x (Kinglike(x) and Allegretto(x) -> Untouched(x))\n\nnot Untouched(pete)\n\nBackslide(violetta, pete) and forall x (Backslide(x, pete) -> Untouched(pete)) -> therefore Untouched(pete)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The engracia hear the vivie. The vivie hear the celisse. The jameson does not see the engracia. The celisse vote the vivie. If something vote the vivie then the vivie is unicuspid. If the vivie is unicuspid then the vivie is not otherwise. If something is andalusian and otherwise then it is unicuspid. The vivie is not otherwise.", "logic": "\nHear(engracia, vivie)\nHear(vivie, celisse)\nnot Hear(jameson, engracia)\nVote(celisse, vivie)\nforall x (Vote(x, vivie) -> Unicuspid(vivie))\nUnicuspid(vivie) -> not Otherwise(vivie)\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Otherwise(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\n\nnot Otherwise(vivie)\n\nVote(celisse, vivie) and forall x (Vote(x, vivie) -> Unicuspid(vivie)) -> therefore Unicuspid(vivie) Unicuspid(vivie) and Unicuspid(vivie) -> not Otherwise(vivie) -> therefore not Otherwise(vivie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The maia devote the hoyt. The hoyt devote the roseanne. The lemmy does not see the maia. The roseanne waltz the hoyt. If something waltz the hoyt then the hoyt is writhed. If the hoyt is writhed then the hoyt is not berserk. If something is seeming and berserk then it is writhed. The hoyt is berserk.", "logic": "\nDevote(maia, hoyt)\nDevote(hoyt, roseanne)\nnot Devote(lemmy, maia)\nWaltz(roseanne, hoyt)\nforall x (Waltz(x, hoyt) -> Writhed(hoyt))\nWrithed(hoyt) -> not Berserk(hoyt)\nforall x (Seeming(x) and Berserk(x) -> Writhed(x))\n\nBerserk(hoyt)\n\nWaltz(roseanne, hoyt) and forall x (Waltz(x, hoyt) -> Writhed(hoyt)) -> therefore Writhed(hoyt) Writhed(hoyt) and Writhed(hoyt) -> not Berserk(hoyt) -> therefore not Berserk(hoyt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The paule swathe the ulick. The ulick swathe the rivi. The linell does not see the paule. The rivi brim the ulick. If something brim the ulick then the ulick is palmy. If the ulick is palmy then the ulick is not avid. If something is prickly and avid then it is palmy. The rivi is not palmy.", "logic": "\nSwathe(paule, ulick)\nSwathe(ulick, rivi)\nnot Swathe(linell, paule)\nBrim(rivi, ulick)\nforall x (Brim(x, ulick) -> Palmy(ulick))\nPalmy(ulick) -> not Avid(ulick)\nforall x (Prickly(x) and Avid(x) -> Palmy(x))\n\nnot Palmy(rivi)\n\nforall x (Prickly(x) and Avid(x) -> Palmy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The mahmud pique the jannel. The jannel pique the rodge. The shawna does not see the mahmud. The rodge retry the jannel. If something retry the jannel then the jannel is mitigatory. If the jannel is mitigatory then the jannel is not successive. If something is hokey and successive then it is mitigatory. The shawna is mitigatory.", "logic": "\nPique(mahmud, jannel)\nPique(jannel, rodge)\nnot Pique(shawna, mahmud)\nRetry(rodge, jannel)\nforall x (Retry(x, jannel) -> Mitigatory(jannel))\nMitigatory(jannel) -> not Successive(jannel)\nforall x (Hokey(x) and Successive(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\n\nMitigatory(shawna)\n\nforall x (Hokey(x) and Successive(x) -> Mitigatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The moria raddle the annadiana. The annadiana raddle the sonnnie. The flo does not see the moria. The sonnnie retick the annadiana. If something retick the annadiana then the annadiana is interior. If the annadiana is interior then the annadiana is not unwrapped. If something is hapless and unwrapped then it is interior. The moria is not interior.", "logic": "\nRaddle(moria, annadiana)\nRaddle(annadiana, sonnnie)\nnot Raddle(flo, moria)\nRetick(sonnnie, annadiana)\nforall x (Retick(x, annadiana) -> Interior(annadiana))\nInterior(annadiana) -> not Unwrapped(annadiana)\nforall x (Hapless(x) and Unwrapped(x) -> Interior(x))\n\nnot Interior(moria)\n\nforall x (Hapless(x) and Unwrapped(x) -> Interior(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The ellen middle the anna. The anna middle the ammamaria. The doloritas does not see the ellen. The ammamaria drag the anna. If something drag the anna then the anna is unifoliate. If the anna is unifoliate then the anna is not barefooted. If something is prisonlike and barefooted then it is unifoliate. The ellen is barefooted.", "logic": "\nMiddle(ellen, anna)\nMiddle(anna, ammamaria)\nnot Middle(doloritas, ellen)\nDrag(ammamaria, anna)\nforall x (Drag(x, anna) -> Unifoliate(anna))\nUnifoliate(anna) -> not Barefooted(anna)\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) and Barefooted(x) -> Unifoliate(x))\n\nBarefooted(ellen)\n\nBarefooted(ellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The theresina mainline the tawnya. The tawnya mainline the marketa. The brittan does not see the theresina. The marketa deposit the tawnya. If something deposit the tawnya then the tawnya is wasted. If the tawnya is wasted then the tawnya is not turgid. If something is malodorous and turgid then it is wasted. The tawnya does not eat the brittan.", "logic": "\nMainline(theresina, tawnya)\nMainline(tawnya, marketa)\nnot Mainline(brittan, theresina)\nDeposit(marketa, tawnya)\nforall x (Deposit(x, tawnya) -> Wasted(tawnya))\nWasted(tawnya) -> not Turgid(tawnya)\nforall x (Malodorous(x) and Turgid(x) -> Wasted(x))\n\nnot Deposit(tawnya, brittan)\n\nnot Deposit(tawnya, brittan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The ardene corduroy the jobey. The jobey corduroy the hope. The janus does not see the ardene. The hope eviscerate the jobey. If something eviscerate the jobey then the jobey is discerning. If the jobey is discerning then the jobey is not comatose. If something is waterproof and comatose then it is discerning. The hope likes the jobey.", "logic": "\nCorduroy(ardene, jobey)\nCorduroy(jobey, hope)\nnot Corduroy(janus, ardene)\nEviscerate(hope, jobey)\nforall x (Eviscerate(x, jobey) -> Discerning(jobey))\nDiscerning(jobey) -> not Comatose(jobey)\nforall x (Waterproof(x) and Comatose(x) -> Discerning(x))\n\nLikes(hope, jobey)\n\nLikes(hope, jobey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1004"} {"premises": "The olivie equip the ruben. The olivie equip the lonny. The olivie shell the tersina. The ruben is rootless. The ruben unbraid the tersina. The tersina unbraid the ruben. The tersina shell the ruben. The lonny is augitic. The lonny unbraid the ruben. The lonny unbraid the tersina. If someone shell the olivie then they eat the ruben. If someone unbraid the ruben and they eat the tersina then they like the tersina. If someone equip the tersina then they need the ruben. If someone shell the olivie then they are stenotic. If the ruben is augitic then the ruben unbraid the tersina. If someone unbraid the olivie then the olivie is augitic. If someone equip the ruben then the ruben shell the tersina. If someone equip the ruben then the ruben unbraid the olivie. The lonny is augitic.", "logic": "\nEquip(olivie, ruben)\nEquip(olivie, lonny)\nShell(olivie, tersina)\nRootless(ruben)\nUnbraid(ruben, tersina)\nUnbraid(tersina, ruben)\nShell(tersina, ruben)\nAugitic(lonny)\nUnbraid(lonny, ruben)\nUnbraid(lonny, tersina)\nforall x (Shell(x, olivie) -> Equip(x, ruben))\nforall x (Unbraid(x, ruben) and Equip(x, tersina) -> Unbraid(x, tersina))\nforall x (Equip(x, tersina) -> Shell(x, ruben))\nforall x (Shell(x, olivie) -> Stenotic(x))\nAugitic(ruben) -> Unbraid(ruben, tersina)\nforall x (Unbraid(x, olivie) -> Augitic(olivie))\nforall x (Equip(x, ruben) -> Shell(ruben, tersina))\nforall x (Equip(x, ruben) -> Unbraid(ruben, olivie))\n\nAugitic(lonny)\n\ntherefore Augitic(lonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The willette foot the matias. The willette foot the elora. The willette inspan the darth. The matias is finnish. The matias borrow the darth. The darth borrow the matias. The darth inspan the matias. The elora is topical. The elora borrow the matias. The elora borrow the darth. If someone inspan the willette then they eat the matias. If someone borrow the matias and they eat the darth then they like the darth. If someone foot the darth then they need the matias. If someone inspan the willette then they are orbiculate. If the matias is topical then the matias borrow the darth. If someone borrow the willette then the willette is topical. If someone foot the matias then the matias inspan the darth. If someone foot the matias then the matias borrow the willette. The willette does not eat the elora.", "logic": "\nFoot(willette, matias)\nFoot(willette, elora)\nInspan(willette, darth)\nFinnish(matias)\nBorrow(matias, darth)\nBorrow(darth, matias)\nInspan(darth, matias)\nTopical(elora)\nBorrow(elora, matias)\nBorrow(elora, darth)\nforall x (Inspan(x, willette) -> Foot(x, matias))\nforall x (Borrow(x, matias) and Foot(x, darth) -> Borrow(x, darth))\nforall x (Foot(x, darth) -> Inspan(x, matias))\nforall x (Inspan(x, willette) -> Orbiculate(x))\nTopical(matias) -> Borrow(matias, darth)\nforall x (Borrow(x, willette) -> Topical(willette))\nforall x (Foot(x, matias) -> Inspan(matias, darth))\nforall x (Foot(x, matias) -> Borrow(matias, willette))\n\nnot Foot(willette, elora)\n\ntherefore Foot(willette, elora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The katya whine the paten. The katya whine the olga. The katya protect the kelly. The paten is unloaded. The paten gyrate the kelly. The kelly gyrate the paten. The kelly protect the paten. The olga is tearless. The olga gyrate the paten. The olga gyrate the kelly. If someone protect the katya then they eat the paten. If someone gyrate the paten and they eat the kelly then they like the kelly. If someone whine the kelly then they need the paten. If someone protect the katya then they are anatomical. If the paten is tearless then the paten gyrate the kelly. If someone gyrate the katya then the katya is tearless. If someone whine the paten then the paten protect the kelly. If someone whine the paten then the paten gyrate the katya. The paten protect the kelly.", "logic": "\nWhine(katya, paten)\nWhine(katya, olga)\nProtect(katya, kelly)\nUnloaded(paten)\nGyrate(paten, kelly)\nGyrate(kelly, paten)\nProtect(kelly, paten)\nTearless(olga)\nGyrate(olga, paten)\nGyrate(olga, kelly)\nforall x (Protect(x, katya) -> Whine(x, paten))\nforall x (Gyrate(x, paten) and Whine(x, kelly) -> Gyrate(x, kelly))\nforall x (Whine(x, kelly) -> Protect(x, paten))\nforall x (Protect(x, katya) -> Anatomical(x))\nTearless(paten) -> Gyrate(paten, kelly)\nforall x (Gyrate(x, katya) -> Tearless(katya))\nforall x (Whine(x, paten) -> Protect(paten, kelly))\nforall x (Whine(x, paten) -> Gyrate(paten, katya))\n\nProtect(paten, kelly)\n\nWhine(katya, paten) and forall x (Whine(x, paten) -> Protect(paten, kelly)) -> therefore Protect(paten, kelly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The fanechka order the bridget. The fanechka order the lizabeth. The fanechka soothe the bruno. The bridget is medium. The bridget single the bruno. The bruno single the bridget. The bruno soothe the bridget. The lizabeth is upright. The lizabeth single the bridget. The lizabeth single the bruno. If someone soothe the fanechka then they eat the bridget. If someone single the bridget and they eat the bruno then they like the bruno. If someone order the bruno then they need the bridget. If someone soothe the fanechka then they are unremedied. If the bridget is upright then the bridget single the bruno. If someone single the fanechka then the fanechka is upright. If someone order the bridget then the bridget soothe the bruno. If someone order the bridget then the bridget single the fanechka. The bridget does not like the fanechka.", "logic": "\nOrder(fanechka, bridget)\nOrder(fanechka, lizabeth)\nSoothe(fanechka, bruno)\nMedium(bridget)\nSingle(bridget, bruno)\nSingle(bruno, bridget)\nSoothe(bruno, bridget)\nUpright(lizabeth)\nSingle(lizabeth, bridget)\nSingle(lizabeth, bruno)\nforall x (Soothe(x, fanechka) -> Order(x, bridget))\nforall x (Single(x, bridget) and Order(x, bruno) -> Single(x, bruno))\nforall x (Order(x, bruno) -> Soothe(x, bridget))\nforall x (Soothe(x, fanechka) -> Unremedied(x))\nUpright(bridget) -> Single(bridget, bruno)\nforall x (Single(x, fanechka) -> Upright(fanechka))\nforall x (Order(x, bridget) -> Soothe(bridget, bruno))\nforall x (Order(x, bridget) -> Single(bridget, fanechka))\n\nnot Single(bridget, fanechka)\n\nOrder(fanechka, bridget) and forall x (Order(x, bridget) -> Single(bridget, fanechka)) -> therefore Single(bridget, fanechka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The kathlene state the dewey. The kathlene state the katherine. The kathlene bathe the roberta. The dewey is vesicatory. The dewey sanctify the roberta. The roberta sanctify the dewey. The roberta bathe the dewey. The katherine is boon. The katherine sanctify the dewey. The katherine sanctify the roberta. If someone bathe the kathlene then they eat the dewey. If someone sanctify the dewey and they eat the roberta then they like the roberta. If someone state the roberta then they need the dewey. If someone bathe the kathlene then they are extropic. If the dewey is boon then the dewey sanctify the roberta. If someone sanctify the kathlene then the kathlene is boon. If someone state the dewey then the dewey bathe the roberta. If someone state the dewey then the dewey sanctify the kathlene. The kathlene is boon.", "logic": "\nState(kathlene, dewey)\nState(kathlene, katherine)\nBathe(kathlene, roberta)\nVesicatory(dewey)\nSanctify(dewey, roberta)\nSanctify(roberta, dewey)\nBathe(roberta, dewey)\nBoon(katherine)\nSanctify(katherine, dewey)\nSanctify(katherine, roberta)\nforall x (Bathe(x, kathlene) -> State(x, dewey))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, dewey) and State(x, roberta) -> Sanctify(x, roberta))\nforall x (State(x, roberta) -> Bathe(x, dewey))\nforall x (Bathe(x, kathlene) -> Extropic(x))\nBoon(dewey) -> Sanctify(dewey, roberta)\nforall x (Sanctify(x, kathlene) -> Boon(kathlene))\nforall x (State(x, dewey) -> Bathe(dewey, roberta))\nforall x (State(x, dewey) -> Sanctify(dewey, kathlene))\n\nBoon(kathlene)\n\nState(kathlene, dewey) and forall x (State(x, dewey) -> Sanctify(dewey, kathlene)) -> therefore Sanctify(dewey, kathlene) Sanctify(dewey, kathlene) and forall x (Sanctify(x, kathlene) -> Boon(kathlene)) -> therefore Boon(kathlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The dori junket the leontine. The dori junket the kent. The dori synthesise the teodoor. The leontine is theocratic. The leontine hurt the teodoor. The teodoor hurt the leontine. The teodoor synthesise the leontine. The kent is visible. The kent hurt the leontine. The kent hurt the teodoor. If someone synthesise the dori then they eat the leontine. If someone hurt the leontine and they eat the teodoor then they like the teodoor. If someone junket the teodoor then they need the leontine. If someone synthesise the dori then they are humbled. If the leontine is visible then the leontine hurt the teodoor. If someone hurt the dori then the dori is visible. If someone junket the leontine then the leontine synthesise the teodoor. If someone junket the leontine then the leontine hurt the dori. The dori is not visible.", "logic": "\nJunket(dori, leontine)\nJunket(dori, kent)\nSynthesise(dori, teodoor)\nTheocratic(leontine)\nHurt(leontine, teodoor)\nHurt(teodoor, leontine)\nSynthesise(teodoor, leontine)\nVisible(kent)\nHurt(kent, leontine)\nHurt(kent, teodoor)\nforall x (Synthesise(x, dori) -> Junket(x, leontine))\nforall x (Hurt(x, leontine) and Junket(x, teodoor) -> Hurt(x, teodoor))\nforall x (Junket(x, teodoor) -> Synthesise(x, leontine))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, dori) -> Humbled(x))\nVisible(leontine) -> Hurt(leontine, teodoor)\nforall x (Hurt(x, dori) -> Visible(dori))\nforall x (Junket(x, leontine) -> Synthesise(leontine, teodoor))\nforall x (Junket(x, leontine) -> Hurt(leontine, dori))\n\nnot Visible(dori)\n\nJunket(dori, leontine) and forall x (Junket(x, leontine) -> Hurt(leontine, dori)) -> therefore Hurt(leontine, dori) Hurt(leontine, dori) and forall x (Hurt(x, dori) -> Visible(dori)) -> therefore Visible(dori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The reed immingle the mort. The reed immingle the lena. The reed endeavor the karlotta. The mort is geometric. The mort gnash the karlotta. The karlotta gnash the mort. The karlotta endeavor the mort. The lena is raising. The lena gnash the mort. The lena gnash the karlotta. If someone endeavor the reed then they eat the mort. If someone gnash the mort and they eat the karlotta then they like the karlotta. If someone immingle the karlotta then they need the mort. If someone endeavor the reed then they are sustained. If the mort is raising then the mort gnash the karlotta. If someone gnash the reed then the reed is raising. If someone immingle the mort then the mort endeavor the karlotta. If someone immingle the mort then the mort gnash the reed. The karlotta does not like the karlotta.", "logic": "\nImmingle(reed, mort)\nImmingle(reed, lena)\nEndeavor(reed, karlotta)\nGeometric(mort)\nGnash(mort, karlotta)\nGnash(karlotta, mort)\nEndeavor(karlotta, mort)\nRaising(lena)\nGnash(lena, mort)\nGnash(lena, karlotta)\nforall x (Endeavor(x, reed) -> Immingle(x, mort))\nforall x (Gnash(x, mort) and Immingle(x, karlotta) -> Gnash(x, karlotta))\nforall x (Immingle(x, karlotta) -> Endeavor(x, mort))\nforall x (Endeavor(x, reed) -> Sustained(x))\nRaising(mort) -> Gnash(mort, karlotta)\nforall x (Gnash(x, reed) -> Raising(reed))\nforall x (Immingle(x, mort) -> Endeavor(mort, karlotta))\nforall x (Immingle(x, mort) -> Gnash(mort, reed))\n\nnot Gnash(karlotta, karlotta)\n\nforall x (Gnash(x, mort) and Immingle(x, karlotta) -> Gnash(x, karlotta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The luella rally the caressa. The luella rally the filip. The luella satisfise the min. The caressa is zonal. The caressa infuriate the min. The min infuriate the caressa. The min satisfise the caressa. The filip is emarginate. The filip infuriate the caressa. The filip infuriate the min. If someone satisfise the luella then they eat the caressa. If someone infuriate the caressa and they eat the min then they like the min. If someone rally the min then they need the caressa. If someone satisfise the luella then they are unpunctual. If the caressa is emarginate then the caressa infuriate the min. If someone infuriate the luella then the luella is emarginate. If someone rally the caressa then the caressa satisfise the min. If someone rally the caressa then the caressa infuriate the luella. The min rally the caressa.", "logic": "\nRally(luella, caressa)\nRally(luella, filip)\nSatisfise(luella, min)\nZonal(caressa)\nInfuriate(caressa, min)\nInfuriate(min, caressa)\nSatisfise(min, caressa)\nEmarginate(filip)\nInfuriate(filip, caressa)\nInfuriate(filip, min)\nforall x (Satisfise(x, luella) -> Rally(x, caressa))\nforall x (Infuriate(x, caressa) and Rally(x, min) -> Infuriate(x, min))\nforall x (Rally(x, min) -> Satisfise(x, caressa))\nforall x (Satisfise(x, luella) -> Unpunctual(x))\nEmarginate(caressa) -> Infuriate(caressa, min)\nforall x (Infuriate(x, luella) -> Emarginate(luella))\nforall x (Rally(x, caressa) -> Satisfise(caressa, min))\nforall x (Rally(x, caressa) -> Infuriate(caressa, luella))\n\nRally(min, caressa)\n\nforall x (Satisfise(x, luella) -> Rally(x, caressa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The lazar pelt the sydney. The lazar pelt the kingsly. The lazar suspire the maxy. The sydney is lowercase. The sydney crate the maxy. The maxy crate the sydney. The maxy suspire the sydney. The kingsly is benzoic. The kingsly crate the sydney. The kingsly crate the maxy. If someone suspire the lazar then they eat the sydney. If someone crate the sydney and they eat the maxy then they like the maxy. If someone pelt the maxy then they need the sydney. If someone suspire the lazar then they are perceived. If the sydney is benzoic then the sydney crate the maxy. If someone crate the lazar then the lazar is benzoic. If someone pelt the sydney then the sydney suspire the maxy. If someone pelt the sydney then the sydney crate the lazar. The maxy is not perceived.", "logic": "\nPelt(lazar, sydney)\nPelt(lazar, kingsly)\nSuspire(lazar, maxy)\nLowercase(sydney)\nCrate(sydney, maxy)\nCrate(maxy, sydney)\nSuspire(maxy, sydney)\nBenzoic(kingsly)\nCrate(kingsly, sydney)\nCrate(kingsly, maxy)\nforall x (Suspire(x, lazar) -> Pelt(x, sydney))\nforall x (Crate(x, sydney) and Pelt(x, maxy) -> Crate(x, maxy))\nforall x (Pelt(x, maxy) -> Suspire(x, sydney))\nforall x (Suspire(x, lazar) -> Perceived(x))\nBenzoic(sydney) -> Crate(sydney, maxy)\nforall x (Crate(x, lazar) -> Benzoic(lazar))\nforall x (Pelt(x, sydney) -> Suspire(sydney, maxy))\nforall x (Pelt(x, sydney) -> Crate(sydney, lazar))\n\nnot Perceived(maxy)\n\nforall x (Suspire(x, lazar) -> Perceived(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The sondra plug the pepita. The sondra plug the moria. The sondra capsulise the gaynor. The pepita is brattish. The pepita boondoggle the gaynor. The gaynor boondoggle the pepita. The gaynor capsulise the pepita. The moria is provisory. The moria boondoggle the pepita. The moria boondoggle the gaynor. If someone capsulise the sondra then they eat the pepita. If someone boondoggle the pepita and they eat the gaynor then they like the gaynor. If someone plug the gaynor then they need the pepita. If someone capsulise the sondra then they are bulbed. If the pepita is provisory then the pepita boondoggle the gaynor. If someone boondoggle the sondra then the sondra is provisory. If someone plug the pepita then the pepita capsulise the gaynor. If someone plug the pepita then the pepita boondoggle the sondra. The pepita capsulise the moria.", "logic": "\nPlug(sondra, pepita)\nPlug(sondra, moria)\nCapsulise(sondra, gaynor)\nBrattish(pepita)\nBoondoggle(pepita, gaynor)\nBoondoggle(gaynor, pepita)\nCapsulise(gaynor, pepita)\nProvisory(moria)\nBoondoggle(moria, pepita)\nBoondoggle(moria, gaynor)\nforall x (Capsulise(x, sondra) -> Plug(x, pepita))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, pepita) and Plug(x, gaynor) -> Boondoggle(x, gaynor))\nforall x (Plug(x, gaynor) -> Capsulise(x, pepita))\nforall x (Capsulise(x, sondra) -> Bulbed(x))\nProvisory(pepita) -> Boondoggle(pepita, gaynor)\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, sondra) -> Provisory(sondra))\nforall x (Plug(x, pepita) -> Capsulise(pepita, gaynor))\nforall x (Plug(x, pepita) -> Boondoggle(pepita, sondra))\n\nCapsulise(pepita, moria)\n\nCapsulise(pepita, moria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The chloe scythe the renault. The chloe scythe the nolan. The chloe submerse the olva. The renault is erasmian. The renault feel the olva. The olva feel the renault. The olva submerse the renault. The nolan is primitive. The nolan feel the renault. The nolan feel the olva. If someone submerse the chloe then they eat the renault. If someone feel the renault and they eat the olva then they like the olva. If someone scythe the olva then they need the renault. If someone submerse the chloe then they are monandrous. If the renault is primitive then the renault feel the olva. If someone feel the chloe then the chloe is primitive. If someone scythe the renault then the renault submerse the olva. If someone scythe the renault then the renault feel the chloe. The olva is not primitive.", "logic": "\nScythe(chloe, renault)\nScythe(chloe, nolan)\nSubmerse(chloe, olva)\nErasmian(renault)\nFeel(renault, olva)\nFeel(olva, renault)\nSubmerse(olva, renault)\nPrimitive(nolan)\nFeel(nolan, renault)\nFeel(nolan, olva)\nforall x (Submerse(x, chloe) -> Scythe(x, renault))\nforall x (Feel(x, renault) and Scythe(x, olva) -> Feel(x, olva))\nforall x (Scythe(x, olva) -> Submerse(x, renault))\nforall x (Submerse(x, chloe) -> Monandrous(x))\nPrimitive(renault) -> Feel(renault, olva)\nforall x (Feel(x, chloe) -> Primitive(chloe))\nforall x (Scythe(x, renault) -> Submerse(renault, olva))\nforall x (Scythe(x, renault) -> Feel(renault, chloe))\n\nnot Primitive(olva)\n\nnot Primitive(olva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The orly exsert the carol. The orly exsert the brandy. The orly postpone the levin. The carol is grouped. The carol swoop the levin. The levin swoop the carol. The levin postpone the carol. The brandy is turbinate. The brandy swoop the carol. The brandy swoop the levin. If someone postpone the orly then they eat the carol. If someone swoop the carol and they eat the levin then they like the levin. If someone exsert the levin then they need the carol. If someone postpone the orly then they are hastate. If the carol is turbinate then the carol swoop the levin. If someone swoop the orly then the orly is turbinate. If someone exsert the carol then the carol postpone the levin. If someone exsert the carol then the carol swoop the orly. The carol is turbinate.", "logic": "\nExsert(orly, carol)\nExsert(orly, brandy)\nPostpone(orly, levin)\nGrouped(carol)\nSwoop(carol, levin)\nSwoop(levin, carol)\nPostpone(levin, carol)\nTurbinate(brandy)\nSwoop(brandy, carol)\nSwoop(brandy, levin)\nforall x (Postpone(x, orly) -> Exsert(x, carol))\nforall x (Swoop(x, carol) and Exsert(x, levin) -> Swoop(x, levin))\nforall x (Exsert(x, levin) -> Postpone(x, carol))\nforall x (Postpone(x, orly) -> Hastate(x))\nTurbinate(carol) -> Swoop(carol, levin)\nforall x (Swoop(x, orly) -> Turbinate(orly))\nforall x (Exsert(x, carol) -> Postpone(carol, levin))\nforall x (Exsert(x, carol) -> Swoop(carol, orly))\n\nTurbinate(carol)\n\nTurbinate(carol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2127"} {"premises": "The davida does not eat the olle. The davida malign the marthe. The davida is whatever. The davida is zoic. The davida hoard the marthe. The davida untwine the olle. The davida untwine the marthe. The olle is unreserved. The olle hoard the davida. The olle does not like the marthe. The marthe is whatever. The marthe is epileptic. If something untwine the marthe then the marthe is muggy. If the olle untwine the marthe then the marthe malign the davida. If the marthe hoard the davida then the marthe is epileptic. If the olle does not like the davida then the olle untwine the marthe. If something is epileptic then it is muggy. If something is muggy and epileptic then it untwine the olle. If something malign the davida and the davida malign the olle then it is zoic. If the marthe malign the olle and the marthe does not visit the olle then the marthe is whatever. The davida hoard the marthe.", "logic": "\nnot Malign(davida, olle)\nMalign(davida, marthe)\nWhatever(davida)\nZoic(davida)\nHoard(davida, marthe)\nUntwine(davida, olle)\nUntwine(davida, marthe)\nUnreserved(olle)\nHoard(olle, davida)\nnot Hoard(olle, marthe)\nWhatever(marthe)\nEpileptic(marthe)\nforall x (Untwine(x, marthe) -> Muggy(marthe))\nUntwine(olle, marthe) -> Malign(marthe, davida)\nHoard(marthe, davida) -> Epileptic(marthe)\nnot Hoard(olle, davida) -> Untwine(olle, marthe)\nforall x (Epileptic(x) -> Muggy(x))\nforall x (Muggy(x) and Epileptic(x) -> Untwine(x, olle))\nforall x (Malign(x, davida) and Malign(davida, olle) -> Zoic(x))\nMalign(marthe, olle) and not Untwine(marthe, olle) -> Whatever(marthe)\n\nHoard(davida, marthe)\n\ntherefore Hoard(davida, marthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The goober does not eat the emylee. The goober cabal the tibold. The goober is stoneless. The goober is crustose. The goober republish the tibold. The goober brocade the emylee. The goober brocade the tibold. The emylee is dreaded. The emylee republish the goober. The emylee does not like the tibold. The tibold is stoneless. The tibold is palmy. If something brocade the tibold then the tibold is unshaved. If the emylee brocade the tibold then the tibold cabal the goober. If the tibold republish the goober then the tibold is palmy. If the emylee does not like the goober then the emylee brocade the tibold. If something is palmy then it is unshaved. If something is unshaved and palmy then it brocade the emylee. If something cabal the goober and the goober cabal the emylee then it is crustose. If the tibold cabal the emylee and the tibold does not visit the emylee then the tibold is stoneless. The emylee does not like the goober.", "logic": "\nnot Cabal(goober, emylee)\nCabal(goober, tibold)\nStoneless(goober)\nCrustose(goober)\nRepublish(goober, tibold)\nBrocade(goober, emylee)\nBrocade(goober, tibold)\nDreaded(emylee)\nRepublish(emylee, goober)\nnot Republish(emylee, tibold)\nStoneless(tibold)\nPalmy(tibold)\nforall x (Brocade(x, tibold) -> Unshaved(tibold))\nBrocade(emylee, tibold) -> Cabal(tibold, goober)\nRepublish(tibold, goober) -> Palmy(tibold)\nnot Republish(emylee, goober) -> Brocade(emylee, tibold)\nforall x (Palmy(x) -> Unshaved(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) and Palmy(x) -> Brocade(x, emylee))\nforall x (Cabal(x, goober) and Cabal(goober, emylee) -> Crustose(x))\nCabal(tibold, emylee) and not Brocade(tibold, emylee) -> Stoneless(tibold)\n\nnot Republish(emylee, goober)\n\ntherefore Republish(emylee, goober)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The randall does not eat the harald. The randall stet the omar. The randall is heatless. The randall is ovular. The randall stick the omar. The randall shag the harald. The randall shag the omar. The harald is variolar. The harald stick the randall. The harald does not like the omar. The omar is heatless. The omar is constant. If something shag the omar then the omar is deciding. If the harald shag the omar then the omar stet the randall. If the omar stick the randall then the omar is constant. If the harald does not like the randall then the harald shag the omar. If something is constant then it is deciding. If something is deciding and constant then it shag the harald. If something stet the randall and the randall stet the harald then it is ovular. If the omar stet the harald and the omar does not visit the harald then the omar is heatless. The omar is deciding.", "logic": "\nnot Stet(randall, harald)\nStet(randall, omar)\nHeatless(randall)\nOvular(randall)\nStick(randall, omar)\nShag(randall, harald)\nShag(randall, omar)\nVariolar(harald)\nStick(harald, randall)\nnot Stick(harald, omar)\nHeatless(omar)\nConstant(omar)\nforall x (Shag(x, omar) -> Deciding(omar))\nShag(harald, omar) -> Stet(omar, randall)\nStick(omar, randall) -> Constant(omar)\nnot Stick(harald, randall) -> Shag(harald, omar)\nforall x (Constant(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Constant(x) -> Shag(x, harald))\nforall x (Stet(x, randall) and Stet(randall, harald) -> Ovular(x))\nStet(omar, harald) and not Shag(omar, harald) -> Heatless(omar)\n\nDeciding(omar)\n\nConstant(omar) and forall x (Constant(x) -> Deciding(x)) -> therefore Deciding(omar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The reggi does not eat the carissa. The reggi chuckle the kettie. The reggi is unbent. The reggi is aboriginal. The reggi unbalance the kettie. The reggi fend the carissa. The reggi fend the kettie. The carissa is blocky. The carissa unbalance the reggi. The carissa does not like the kettie. The kettie is unbent. The kettie is titulary. If something fend the kettie then the kettie is boronic. If the carissa fend the kettie then the kettie chuckle the reggi. If the kettie unbalance the reggi then the kettie is titulary. If the carissa does not like the reggi then the carissa fend the kettie. If something is titulary then it is boronic. If something is boronic and titulary then it fend the carissa. If something chuckle the reggi and the reggi chuckle the carissa then it is aboriginal. If the kettie chuckle the carissa and the kettie does not visit the carissa then the kettie is unbent. The kettie is not boronic.", "logic": "\nnot Chuckle(reggi, carissa)\nChuckle(reggi, kettie)\nUnbent(reggi)\nAboriginal(reggi)\nUnbalance(reggi, kettie)\nFend(reggi, carissa)\nFend(reggi, kettie)\nBlocky(carissa)\nUnbalance(carissa, reggi)\nnot Unbalance(carissa, kettie)\nUnbent(kettie)\nTitulary(kettie)\nforall x (Fend(x, kettie) -> Boronic(kettie))\nFend(carissa, kettie) -> Chuckle(kettie, reggi)\nUnbalance(kettie, reggi) -> Titulary(kettie)\nnot Unbalance(carissa, reggi) -> Fend(carissa, kettie)\nforall x (Titulary(x) -> Boronic(x))\nforall x (Boronic(x) and Titulary(x) -> Fend(x, carissa))\nforall x (Chuckle(x, reggi) and Chuckle(reggi, carissa) -> Aboriginal(x))\nChuckle(kettie, carissa) and not Fend(kettie, carissa) -> Unbent(kettie)\n\nnot Boronic(kettie)\n\nTitulary(kettie) and forall x (Titulary(x) -> Boronic(x)) -> therefore Boronic(kettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The lucas does not eat the jordan. The lucas recode the albertine. The lucas is modish. The lucas is graded. The lucas champion the albertine. The lucas renounce the jordan. The lucas renounce the albertine. The jordan is soaring. The jordan champion the lucas. The jordan does not like the albertine. The albertine is modish. The albertine is comely. If something renounce the albertine then the albertine is cheerless. If the jordan renounce the albertine then the albertine recode the lucas. If the albertine champion the lucas then the albertine is comely. If the jordan does not like the lucas then the jordan renounce the albertine. If something is comely then it is cheerless. If something is cheerless and comely then it renounce the jordan. If something recode the lucas and the lucas recode the jordan then it is graded. If the albertine recode the jordan and the albertine does not visit the jordan then the albertine is modish. The albertine renounce the jordan.", "logic": "\nnot Recode(lucas, jordan)\nRecode(lucas, albertine)\nModish(lucas)\nGraded(lucas)\nChampion(lucas, albertine)\nRenounce(lucas, jordan)\nRenounce(lucas, albertine)\nSoaring(jordan)\nChampion(jordan, lucas)\nnot Champion(jordan, albertine)\nModish(albertine)\nComely(albertine)\nforall x (Renounce(x, albertine) -> Cheerless(albertine))\nRenounce(jordan, albertine) -> Recode(albertine, lucas)\nChampion(albertine, lucas) -> Comely(albertine)\nnot Champion(jordan, lucas) -> Renounce(jordan, albertine)\nforall x (Comely(x) -> Cheerless(x))\nforall x (Cheerless(x) and Comely(x) -> Renounce(x, jordan))\nforall x (Recode(x, lucas) and Recode(lucas, jordan) -> Graded(x))\nRecode(albertine, jordan) and not Renounce(albertine, jordan) -> Modish(albertine)\n\nRenounce(albertine, jordan)\n\nComely(albertine) and forall x (Comely(x) -> Cheerless(x)) -> therefore Cheerless(albertine) Cheerless(albertine) and Comely(albertine) and forall x (Cheerless(x) and Comely(x) -> Renounce(x, jordan)) -> therefore Renounce(albertine, jordan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The sallee does not eat the desirae. The sallee annihilate the murdock. The sallee is clothed. The sallee is unhappy. The sallee dredge the murdock. The sallee rejoin the desirae. The sallee rejoin the murdock. The desirae is blackened. The desirae dredge the sallee. The desirae does not like the murdock. The murdock is clothed. The murdock is unpassable. If something rejoin the murdock then the murdock is prepacked. If the desirae rejoin the murdock then the murdock annihilate the sallee. If the murdock dredge the sallee then the murdock is unpassable. If the desirae does not like the sallee then the desirae rejoin the murdock. If something is unpassable then it is prepacked. If something is prepacked and unpassable then it rejoin the desirae. If something annihilate the sallee and the sallee annihilate the desirae then it is unhappy. If the murdock annihilate the desirae and the murdock does not visit the desirae then the murdock is clothed. The murdock does not visit the desirae.", "logic": "\nnot Annihilate(sallee, desirae)\nAnnihilate(sallee, murdock)\nClothed(sallee)\nUnhappy(sallee)\nDredge(sallee, murdock)\nRejoin(sallee, desirae)\nRejoin(sallee, murdock)\nBlackened(desirae)\nDredge(desirae, sallee)\nnot Dredge(desirae, murdock)\nClothed(murdock)\nUnpassable(murdock)\nforall x (Rejoin(x, murdock) -> Prepacked(murdock))\nRejoin(desirae, murdock) -> Annihilate(murdock, sallee)\nDredge(murdock, sallee) -> Unpassable(murdock)\nnot Dredge(desirae, sallee) -> Rejoin(desirae, murdock)\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> Prepacked(x))\nforall x (Prepacked(x) and Unpassable(x) -> Rejoin(x, desirae))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, sallee) and Annihilate(sallee, desirae) -> Unhappy(x))\nAnnihilate(murdock, desirae) and not Rejoin(murdock, desirae) -> Clothed(murdock)\n\nnot Rejoin(murdock, desirae)\n\nUnpassable(murdock) and forall x (Unpassable(x) -> Prepacked(x)) -> therefore Prepacked(murdock) Prepacked(murdock) and Unpassable(murdock) and forall x (Prepacked(x) and Unpassable(x) -> Rejoin(x, desirae)) -> therefore Rejoin(murdock, desirae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The levon does not eat the collie. The levon higgle the candi. The levon is wheezy. The levon is unseeable. The levon resew the candi. The levon smack the collie. The levon smack the candi. The collie is cursed. The collie resew the levon. The collie does not like the candi. The candi is wheezy. The candi is sunbaked. If something smack the candi then the candi is acquitted. If the collie smack the candi then the candi higgle the levon. If the candi resew the levon then the candi is sunbaked. If the collie does not like the levon then the collie smack the candi. If something is sunbaked then it is acquitted. If something is acquitted and sunbaked then it smack the collie. If something higgle the levon and the levon higgle the collie then it is unseeable. If the candi higgle the collie and the candi does not visit the collie then the candi is wheezy. The candi does not eat the levon.", "logic": "\nnot Higgle(levon, collie)\nHiggle(levon, candi)\nWheezy(levon)\nUnseeable(levon)\nResew(levon, candi)\nSmack(levon, collie)\nSmack(levon, candi)\nCursed(collie)\nResew(collie, levon)\nnot Resew(collie, candi)\nWheezy(candi)\nSunbaked(candi)\nforall x (Smack(x, candi) -> Acquitted(candi))\nSmack(collie, candi) -> Higgle(candi, levon)\nResew(candi, levon) -> Sunbaked(candi)\nnot Resew(collie, levon) -> Smack(collie, candi)\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Acquitted(x))\nforall x (Acquitted(x) and Sunbaked(x) -> Smack(x, collie))\nforall x (Higgle(x, levon) and Higgle(levon, collie) -> Unseeable(x))\nHiggle(candi, collie) and not Smack(candi, collie) -> Wheezy(candi)\n\nnot Higgle(candi, levon)\n\nSmack(collie, candi) -> Higgle(candi, levon) <- not Resew(collie, levon) -> Smack(collie, candi) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The sallyann does not eat the claudelle. The sallyann raze the anabel. The sallyann is cyclonic. The sallyann is haitian. The sallyann excoriate the anabel. The sallyann crackle the claudelle. The sallyann crackle the anabel. The claudelle is healthful. The claudelle excoriate the sallyann. The claudelle does not like the anabel. The anabel is cyclonic. The anabel is cuban. If something crackle the anabel then the anabel is trigonal. If the claudelle crackle the anabel then the anabel raze the sallyann. If the anabel excoriate the sallyann then the anabel is cuban. If the claudelle does not like the sallyann then the claudelle crackle the anabel. If something is cuban then it is trigonal. If something is trigonal and cuban then it crackle the claudelle. If something raze the sallyann and the sallyann raze the claudelle then it is haitian. If the anabel raze the claudelle and the anabel does not visit the claudelle then the anabel is cyclonic. The claudelle is trigonal.", "logic": "\nnot Raze(sallyann, claudelle)\nRaze(sallyann, anabel)\nCyclonic(sallyann)\nHaitian(sallyann)\nExcoriate(sallyann, anabel)\nCrackle(sallyann, claudelle)\nCrackle(sallyann, anabel)\nHealthful(claudelle)\nExcoriate(claudelle, sallyann)\nnot Excoriate(claudelle, anabel)\nCyclonic(anabel)\nCuban(anabel)\nforall x (Crackle(x, anabel) -> Trigonal(anabel))\nCrackle(claudelle, anabel) -> Raze(anabel, sallyann)\nExcoriate(anabel, sallyann) -> Cuban(anabel)\nnot Excoriate(claudelle, sallyann) -> Crackle(claudelle, anabel)\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Trigonal(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) and Cuban(x) -> Crackle(x, claudelle))\nforall x (Raze(x, sallyann) and Raze(sallyann, claudelle) -> Haitian(x))\nRaze(anabel, claudelle) and not Crackle(anabel, claudelle) -> Cyclonic(anabel)\n\nTrigonal(claudelle)\n\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Trigonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The minnie does not eat the claudetta. The minnie enrobe the warren. The minnie is overfull. The minnie is flowery. The minnie compile the warren. The minnie notate the claudetta. The minnie notate the warren. The claudetta is thankful. The claudetta compile the minnie. The claudetta does not like the warren. The warren is overfull. The warren is confusable. If something notate the warren then the warren is larboard. If the claudetta notate the warren then the warren enrobe the minnie. If the warren compile the minnie then the warren is confusable. If the claudetta does not like the minnie then the claudetta notate the warren. If something is confusable then it is larboard. If something is larboard and confusable then it notate the claudetta. If something enrobe the minnie and the minnie enrobe the claudetta then it is flowery. If the warren enrobe the claudetta and the warren does not visit the claudetta then the warren is overfull. The warren is not flowery.", "logic": "\nnot Enrobe(minnie, claudetta)\nEnrobe(minnie, warren)\nOverfull(minnie)\nFlowery(minnie)\nCompile(minnie, warren)\nNotate(minnie, claudetta)\nNotate(minnie, warren)\nThankful(claudetta)\nCompile(claudetta, minnie)\nnot Compile(claudetta, warren)\nOverfull(warren)\nConfusable(warren)\nforall x (Notate(x, warren) -> Larboard(warren))\nNotate(claudetta, warren) -> Enrobe(warren, minnie)\nCompile(warren, minnie) -> Confusable(warren)\nnot Compile(claudetta, minnie) -> Notate(claudetta, warren)\nforall x (Confusable(x) -> Larboard(x))\nforall x (Larboard(x) and Confusable(x) -> Notate(x, claudetta))\nforall x (Enrobe(x, minnie) and Enrobe(minnie, claudetta) -> Flowery(x))\nEnrobe(warren, claudetta) and not Notate(warren, claudetta) -> Overfull(warren)\n\nnot Flowery(warren)\n\nforall x (Enrobe(x, minnie) and Enrobe(minnie, claudetta) -> Flowery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The zeke does not eat the netty. The zeke arbitrate the aina. The zeke is navigable. The zeke is deducible. The zeke grout the aina. The zeke wallop the netty. The zeke wallop the aina. The netty is purple. The netty grout the zeke. The netty does not like the aina. The aina is navigable. The aina is aphasic. If something wallop the aina then the aina is apiarian. If the netty wallop the aina then the aina arbitrate the zeke. If the aina grout the zeke then the aina is aphasic. If the netty does not like the zeke then the netty wallop the aina. If something is aphasic then it is apiarian. If something is apiarian and aphasic then it wallop the netty. If something arbitrate the zeke and the zeke arbitrate the netty then it is deducible. If the aina arbitrate the netty and the aina does not visit the netty then the aina is navigable. The aina is purple.", "logic": "\nnot Arbitrate(zeke, netty)\nArbitrate(zeke, aina)\nNavigable(zeke)\nDeducible(zeke)\nGrout(zeke, aina)\nWallop(zeke, netty)\nWallop(zeke, aina)\nPurple(netty)\nGrout(netty, zeke)\nnot Grout(netty, aina)\nNavigable(aina)\nAphasic(aina)\nforall x (Wallop(x, aina) -> Apiarian(aina))\nWallop(netty, aina) -> Arbitrate(aina, zeke)\nGrout(aina, zeke) -> Aphasic(aina)\nnot Grout(netty, zeke) -> Wallop(netty, aina)\nforall x (Aphasic(x) -> Apiarian(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) and Aphasic(x) -> Wallop(x, netty))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, zeke) and Arbitrate(zeke, netty) -> Deducible(x))\nArbitrate(aina, netty) and not Wallop(aina, netty) -> Navigable(aina)\n\nPurple(aina)\n\nPurple(aina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The jany does not eat the caryl. The jany stunt the miquela. The jany is sneaking. The jany is edematous. The jany brake the miquela. The jany disunite the caryl. The jany disunite the miquela. The caryl is diurnal. The caryl brake the jany. The caryl does not like the miquela. The miquela is sneaking. The miquela is placating. If something disunite the miquela then the miquela is roofed. If the caryl disunite the miquela then the miquela stunt the jany. If the miquela brake the jany then the miquela is placating. If the caryl does not like the jany then the caryl disunite the miquela. If something is placating then it is roofed. If something is roofed and placating then it disunite the caryl. If something stunt the jany and the jany stunt the caryl then it is edematous. If the miquela stunt the caryl and the miquela does not visit the caryl then the miquela is sneaking. The jany does not eat the jany.", "logic": "\nnot Stunt(jany, caryl)\nStunt(jany, miquela)\nSneaking(jany)\nEdematous(jany)\nBrake(jany, miquela)\nDisunite(jany, caryl)\nDisunite(jany, miquela)\nDiurnal(caryl)\nBrake(caryl, jany)\nnot Brake(caryl, miquela)\nSneaking(miquela)\nPlacating(miquela)\nforall x (Disunite(x, miquela) -> Roofed(miquela))\nDisunite(caryl, miquela) -> Stunt(miquela, jany)\nBrake(miquela, jany) -> Placating(miquela)\nnot Brake(caryl, jany) -> Disunite(caryl, miquela)\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Roofed(x))\nforall x (Roofed(x) and Placating(x) -> Disunite(x, caryl))\nforall x (Stunt(x, jany) and Stunt(jany, caryl) -> Edematous(x))\nStunt(miquela, caryl) and not Disunite(miquela, caryl) -> Sneaking(miquela)\n\nnot Stunt(jany, jany)\n\nnot Stunt(jany, jany) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "The wakefield does not eat the johnathon. The wakefield spit the sybilla. The wakefield is unrentable. The wakefield is spousal. The wakefield muddy the sybilla. The wakefield signalize the johnathon. The wakefield signalize the sybilla. The johnathon is batty. The johnathon muddy the wakefield. The johnathon does not like the sybilla. The sybilla is unrentable. The sybilla is brownish. If something signalize the sybilla then the sybilla is suchlike. If the johnathon signalize the sybilla then the sybilla spit the wakefield. If the sybilla muddy the wakefield then the sybilla is brownish. If the johnathon does not like the wakefield then the johnathon signalize the sybilla. If something is brownish then it is suchlike. If something is suchlike and brownish then it signalize the johnathon. If something spit the wakefield and the wakefield spit the johnathon then it is spousal. If the sybilla spit the johnathon and the sybilla does not visit the johnathon then the sybilla is unrentable. The wakefield muddy the johnathon.", "logic": "\nnot Spit(wakefield, johnathon)\nSpit(wakefield, sybilla)\nUnrentable(wakefield)\nSpousal(wakefield)\nMuddy(wakefield, sybilla)\nSignalize(wakefield, johnathon)\nSignalize(wakefield, sybilla)\nBatty(johnathon)\nMuddy(johnathon, wakefield)\nnot Muddy(johnathon, sybilla)\nUnrentable(sybilla)\nBrownish(sybilla)\nforall x (Signalize(x, sybilla) -> Suchlike(sybilla))\nSignalize(johnathon, sybilla) -> Spit(sybilla, wakefield)\nMuddy(sybilla, wakefield) -> Brownish(sybilla)\nnot Muddy(johnathon, wakefield) -> Signalize(johnathon, sybilla)\nforall x (Brownish(x) -> Suchlike(x))\nforall x (Suchlike(x) and Brownish(x) -> Signalize(x, johnathon))\nforall x (Spit(x, wakefield) and Spit(wakefield, johnathon) -> Spousal(x))\nSpit(sybilla, johnathon) and not Signalize(sybilla, johnathon) -> Unrentable(sybilla)\n\nMuddy(wakefield, johnathon)\n\nMuddy(wakefield, johnathon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-831"} {"premises": "Gian is impressed. Gian is dedicated. Gian is vagrant. Inna is electoral. Inna is impressed. Inna is nonnative. Inna is dedicated. Inna is vagrant. Inna is monolithic. Chevalier is bedraggled. Chevalier is electoral. Chevalier is impressed. Chevalier is nonnative. Chevalier is dedicated. Chevalier is vagrant. Chevalier is monolithic. All impressed things are bedraggled. If something is electoral and not impressed then it is bedraggled. If something is dedicated and not impressed then it is nonnative. If something is impressed and nonnative then it is vagrant. If something is bedraggled then it is monolithic. If something is dedicated and not nonnative then it is monolithic. Inna is dedicated.", "logic": "\nImpressed(gian)\nDedicated(gian)\nVagrant(gian)\nElectoral(inna)\nImpressed(inna)\nNonnative(inna)\nDedicated(inna)\nVagrant(inna)\nMonolithic(inna)\nBedraggled(chevalier)\nElectoral(chevalier)\nImpressed(chevalier)\nNonnative(chevalier)\nDedicated(chevalier)\nVagrant(chevalier)\nMonolithic(chevalier)\nforall x (Impressed(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Electoral(x) and not Impressed(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and not Impressed(x) -> Nonnative(x))\nforall x (Impressed(x) and Nonnative(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and not Nonnative(x) -> Monolithic(x))\n\nDedicated(inna)\n\ntherefore Dedicated(inna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Milli is chapleted. Milli is sensuous. Milli is hagridden. Aigneis is affecting. Aigneis is chapleted. Aigneis is remediable. Aigneis is sensuous. Aigneis is hagridden. Aigneis is rumbling. Christy is mustached. Christy is affecting. Christy is chapleted. Christy is remediable. Christy is sensuous. Christy is hagridden. Christy is rumbling. All chapleted things are mustached. If something is affecting and not chapleted then it is mustached. If something is sensuous and not chapleted then it is remediable. If something is chapleted and remediable then it is hagridden. If something is mustached then it is rumbling. If something is sensuous and not remediable then it is rumbling. Christy is not remediable.", "logic": "\nChapleted(milli)\nSensuous(milli)\nHagridden(milli)\nAffecting(aigneis)\nChapleted(aigneis)\nRemediable(aigneis)\nSensuous(aigneis)\nHagridden(aigneis)\nRumbling(aigneis)\nMustached(christy)\nAffecting(christy)\nChapleted(christy)\nRemediable(christy)\nSensuous(christy)\nHagridden(christy)\nRumbling(christy)\nforall x (Chapleted(x) -> Mustached(x))\nforall x (Affecting(x) and not Chapleted(x) -> Mustached(x))\nforall x (Sensuous(x) and not Chapleted(x) -> Remediable(x))\nforall x (Chapleted(x) and Remediable(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nforall x (Mustached(x) -> Rumbling(x))\nforall x (Sensuous(x) and not Remediable(x) -> Rumbling(x))\n\nnot Remediable(christy)\n\ntherefore Remediable(christy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Trude is ingrowing. Trude is vindicated. Trude is latino. Codee is semirigid. Codee is ingrowing. Codee is satiated. Codee is vindicated. Codee is latino. Codee is loathly. Delora is pleasing. Delora is semirigid. Delora is ingrowing. Delora is satiated. Delora is vindicated. Delora is latino. Delora is loathly. All ingrowing things are pleasing. If something is semirigid and not ingrowing then it is pleasing. If something is vindicated and not ingrowing then it is satiated. If something is ingrowing and satiated then it is latino. If something is pleasing then it is loathly. If something is vindicated and not satiated then it is loathly. Trude is pleasing.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(trude)\nVindicated(trude)\nLatino(trude)\nSemirigid(codee)\nIngrowing(codee)\nSatiated(codee)\nVindicated(codee)\nLatino(codee)\nLoathly(codee)\nPleasing(delora)\nSemirigid(delora)\nIngrowing(delora)\nSatiated(delora)\nVindicated(delora)\nLatino(delora)\nLoathly(delora)\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Semirigid(x) and not Ingrowing(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Vindicated(x) and not Ingrowing(x) -> Satiated(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) and Satiated(x) -> Latino(x))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Loathly(x))\nforall x (Vindicated(x) and not Satiated(x) -> Loathly(x))\n\nPleasing(trude)\n\nIngrowing(trude) and forall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Pleasing(x)) -> therefore Pleasing(trude)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Annalena is special. Annalena is unsought. Annalena is desegrated. Jojo is listed. Jojo is special. Jojo is inflexible. Jojo is unsought. Jojo is desegrated. Jojo is endogamic. Ciel is terrene. Ciel is listed. Ciel is special. Ciel is inflexible. Ciel is unsought. Ciel is desegrated. Ciel is endogamic. All special things are terrene. If something is listed and not special then it is terrene. If something is unsought and not special then it is inflexible. If something is special and inflexible then it is desegrated. If something is terrene then it is endogamic. If something is unsought and not inflexible then it is endogamic. Jojo is not terrene.", "logic": "\nSpecial(annalena)\nUnsought(annalena)\nDesegrated(annalena)\nListed(jojo)\nSpecial(jojo)\nInflexible(jojo)\nUnsought(jojo)\nDesegrated(jojo)\nEndogamic(jojo)\nTerrene(ciel)\nListed(ciel)\nSpecial(ciel)\nInflexible(ciel)\nUnsought(ciel)\nDesegrated(ciel)\nEndogamic(ciel)\nforall x (Special(x) -> Terrene(x))\nforall x (Listed(x) and not Special(x) -> Terrene(x))\nforall x (Unsought(x) and not Special(x) -> Inflexible(x))\nforall x (Special(x) and Inflexible(x) -> Desegrated(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) -> Endogamic(x))\nforall x (Unsought(x) and not Inflexible(x) -> Endogamic(x))\n\nnot Terrene(jojo)\n\nSpecial(jojo) and forall x (Special(x) -> Terrene(x)) -> therefore Terrene(jojo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Gwenny is menopausal. Gwenny is bothersome. Gwenny is towering. Alfonso is textured. Alfonso is menopausal. Alfonso is agraphic. Alfonso is bothersome. Alfonso is towering. Alfonso is anagogical. Germana is inoperable. Germana is textured. Germana is menopausal. Germana is agraphic. Germana is bothersome. Germana is towering. Germana is anagogical. All menopausal things are inoperable. If something is textured and not menopausal then it is inoperable. If something is bothersome and not menopausal then it is agraphic. If something is menopausal and agraphic then it is towering. If something is inoperable then it is anagogical. If something is bothersome and not agraphic then it is anagogical. Gwenny is anagogical.", "logic": "\nMenopausal(gwenny)\nBothersome(gwenny)\nTowering(gwenny)\nTextured(alfonso)\nMenopausal(alfonso)\nAgraphic(alfonso)\nBothersome(alfonso)\nTowering(alfonso)\nAnagogical(alfonso)\nInoperable(germana)\nTextured(germana)\nMenopausal(germana)\nAgraphic(germana)\nBothersome(germana)\nTowering(germana)\nAnagogical(germana)\nforall x (Menopausal(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Textured(x) and not Menopausal(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) and not Menopausal(x) -> Agraphic(x))\nforall x (Menopausal(x) and Agraphic(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) -> Anagogical(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) and not Agraphic(x) -> Anagogical(x))\n\nAnagogical(gwenny)\n\nMenopausal(gwenny) and forall x (Menopausal(x) -> Inoperable(x)) -> therefore Inoperable(gwenny) Inoperable(gwenny) and forall x (Inoperable(x) -> Anagogical(x)) -> therefore Anagogical(gwenny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Gerard is leftmost. Gerard is colloidal. Gerard is haptic. Gloriane is isoclinal. Gloriane is leftmost. Gloriane is crippled. Gloriane is colloidal. Gloriane is haptic. Gloriane is mastered. Biff is decimal. Biff is isoclinal. Biff is leftmost. Biff is crippled. Biff is colloidal. Biff is haptic. Biff is mastered. All leftmost things are decimal. If something is isoclinal and not leftmost then it is decimal. If something is colloidal and not leftmost then it is crippled. If something is leftmost and crippled then it is haptic. If something is decimal then it is mastered. If something is colloidal and not crippled then it is mastered. Gerard is not mastered.", "logic": "\nLeftmost(gerard)\nColloidal(gerard)\nHaptic(gerard)\nIsoclinal(gloriane)\nLeftmost(gloriane)\nCrippled(gloriane)\nColloidal(gloriane)\nHaptic(gloriane)\nMastered(gloriane)\nDecimal(biff)\nIsoclinal(biff)\nLeftmost(biff)\nCrippled(biff)\nColloidal(biff)\nHaptic(biff)\nMastered(biff)\nforall x (Leftmost(x) -> Decimal(x))\nforall x (Isoclinal(x) and not Leftmost(x) -> Decimal(x))\nforall x (Colloidal(x) and not Leftmost(x) -> Crippled(x))\nforall x (Leftmost(x) and Crippled(x) -> Haptic(x))\nforall x (Decimal(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Colloidal(x) and not Crippled(x) -> Mastered(x))\n\nnot Mastered(gerard)\n\nLeftmost(gerard) and forall x (Leftmost(x) -> Decimal(x)) -> therefore Decimal(gerard) Decimal(gerard) and forall x (Decimal(x) -> Mastered(x)) -> therefore Mastered(gerard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Alexia is mutagenic. Alexia is roiling. Alexia is sorted. Reid is anabiotic. Reid is mutagenic. Reid is awesome. Reid is roiling. Reid is sorted. Reid is unpointed. Roman is enamored. Roman is anabiotic. Roman is mutagenic. Roman is awesome. Roman is roiling. Roman is sorted. Roman is unpointed. All mutagenic things are enamored. If something is anabiotic and not mutagenic then it is enamored. If something is roiling and not mutagenic then it is awesome. If something is mutagenic and awesome then it is sorted. If something is enamored then it is unpointed. If something is roiling and not awesome then it is unpointed. Alexia is not awesome.", "logic": "\nMutagenic(alexia)\nRoiling(alexia)\nSorted(alexia)\nAnabiotic(reid)\nMutagenic(reid)\nAwesome(reid)\nRoiling(reid)\nSorted(reid)\nUnpointed(reid)\nEnamored(roman)\nAnabiotic(roman)\nMutagenic(roman)\nAwesome(roman)\nRoiling(roman)\nSorted(roman)\nUnpointed(roman)\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Enamored(x))\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and not Mutagenic(x) -> Enamored(x))\nforall x (Roiling(x) and not Mutagenic(x) -> Awesome(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and Awesome(x) -> Sorted(x))\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Roiling(x) and not Awesome(x) -> Unpointed(x))\n\nnot Awesome(alexia)\n\nforall x (Roiling(x) and not Mutagenic(x) -> Awesome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Dawna is cleavable. Dawna is tenacious. Dawna is affiliated. Dinah is huxleian. Dinah is cleavable. Dinah is throwaway. Dinah is tenacious. Dinah is affiliated. Dinah is waspish. Casi is hominid. Casi is huxleian. Casi is cleavable. Casi is throwaway. Casi is tenacious. Casi is affiliated. Casi is waspish. All cleavable things are hominid. If something is huxleian and not cleavable then it is hominid. If something is tenacious and not cleavable then it is throwaway. If something is cleavable and throwaway then it is affiliated. If something is hominid then it is waspish. If something is tenacious and not throwaway then it is waspish. Dawna is huxleian.", "logic": "\nCleavable(dawna)\nTenacious(dawna)\nAffiliated(dawna)\nHuxleian(dinah)\nCleavable(dinah)\nThrowaway(dinah)\nTenacious(dinah)\nAffiliated(dinah)\nWaspish(dinah)\nHominid(casi)\nHuxleian(casi)\nCleavable(casi)\nThrowaway(casi)\nTenacious(casi)\nAffiliated(casi)\nWaspish(casi)\nforall x (Cleavable(x) -> Hominid(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) and not Cleavable(x) -> Hominid(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) and not Cleavable(x) -> Throwaway(x))\nforall x (Cleavable(x) and Throwaway(x) -> Affiliated(x))\nforall x (Hominid(x) -> Waspish(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) and not Throwaway(x) -> Waspish(x))\n\nHuxleian(dawna)\n\nHuxleian(dawna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "The mohan leash the ailene. The mohan does not see the nedi. The mohan does not visit the ailene. The ailene is unabashed. The ailene is jocund. The caren does not need the nedi. The caren leash the mohan. The nedi is unabashed. The nedi sorb the ailene. The nedi sorb the caren. If someone leash the mohan then they see the nedi. If someone leash the nedi then the nedi is laboured. The nedi sorb the ailene.", "logic": "\nLeash(mohan, ailene)\nnot Leash(mohan, nedi)\nnot Sorb(mohan, ailene)\nUnabashed(ailene)\nJocund(ailene)\nnot Gasconade(caren, nedi)\nLeash(caren, mohan)\nUnabashed(nedi)\nSorb(nedi, ailene)\nSorb(nedi, caren)\nforall x (Leash(x, mohan) -> Leash(x, nedi))\nforall x (Leash(x, nedi) -> Laboured(nedi))\n\nSorb(nedi, ailene)\n\ntherefore Sorb(nedi, ailene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The torey default the ginny. The torey does not see the mireielle. The torey does not visit the ginny. The ginny is auspicious. The ginny is vasomotor. The jenilee does not need the mireielle. The jenilee default the torey. The mireielle is auspicious. The mireielle build the ginny. The mireielle build the jenilee. If someone default the torey then they see the mireielle. If someone default the mireielle then the mireielle is aqueous. The ginny is not vasomotor.", "logic": "\nDefault(torey, ginny)\nnot Default(torey, mireielle)\nnot Build(torey, ginny)\nAuspicious(ginny)\nVasomotor(ginny)\nnot Route(jenilee, mireielle)\nDefault(jenilee, torey)\nAuspicious(mireielle)\nBuild(mireielle, ginny)\nBuild(mireielle, jenilee)\nforall x (Default(x, torey) -> Default(x, mireielle))\nforall x (Default(x, mireielle) -> Aqueous(mireielle))\n\nnot Vasomotor(ginny)\n\ntherefore Vasomotor(ginny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The scot corner the elladine. The scot does not see the mariska. The scot does not visit the elladine. The elladine is gustative. The elladine is lowering. The myke does not need the mariska. The myke corner the scot. The mariska is gustative. The mariska criticise the elladine. The mariska criticise the myke. If someone corner the scot then they see the mariska. If someone corner the mariska then the mariska is northmost. The myke corner the mariska.", "logic": "\nCorner(scot, elladine)\nnot Corner(scot, mariska)\nnot Criticise(scot, elladine)\nGustative(elladine)\nLowering(elladine)\nnot Cringe(myke, mariska)\nCorner(myke, scot)\nGustative(mariska)\nCriticise(mariska, elladine)\nCriticise(mariska, myke)\nforall x (Corner(x, scot) -> Corner(x, mariska))\nforall x (Corner(x, mariska) -> Northmost(mariska))\n\nCorner(myke, mariska)\n\nCorner(myke, scot) and forall x (Corner(x, scot) -> Corner(x, mariska)) -> therefore Corner(myke, mariska)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The angelia overhang the debra. The angelia does not see the janey. The angelia does not visit the debra. The debra is finable. The debra is acerose. The brigit does not need the janey. The brigit overhang the angelia. The janey is finable. The janey efface the debra. The janey efface the brigit. If someone overhang the angelia then they see the janey. If someone overhang the janey then the janey is lincolnian. The brigit does not see the janey.", "logic": "\nOverhang(angelia, debra)\nnot Overhang(angelia, janey)\nnot Efface(angelia, debra)\nFinable(debra)\nAcerose(debra)\nnot Plight(brigit, janey)\nOverhang(brigit, angelia)\nFinable(janey)\nEfface(janey, debra)\nEfface(janey, brigit)\nforall x (Overhang(x, angelia) -> Overhang(x, janey))\nforall x (Overhang(x, janey) -> Lincolnian(janey))\n\nnot Overhang(brigit, janey)\n\nOverhang(brigit, angelia) and forall x (Overhang(x, angelia) -> Overhang(x, janey)) -> therefore Overhang(brigit, janey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The osbourn flute the skip. The osbourn does not see the lynett. The osbourn does not visit the skip. The skip is unworkable. The skip is down. The margarete does not need the lynett. The margarete flute the osbourn. The lynett is unworkable. The lynett fiddle the skip. The lynett fiddle the margarete. If someone flute the osbourn then they see the lynett. If someone flute the lynett then the lynett is loaded. The lynett is loaded.", "logic": "\nFlute(osbourn, skip)\nnot Flute(osbourn, lynett)\nnot Fiddle(osbourn, skip)\nUnworkable(skip)\nDown(skip)\nnot Record(margarete, lynett)\nFlute(margarete, osbourn)\nUnworkable(lynett)\nFiddle(lynett, skip)\nFiddle(lynett, margarete)\nforall x (Flute(x, osbourn) -> Flute(x, lynett))\nforall x (Flute(x, lynett) -> Loaded(lynett))\n\nLoaded(lynett)\n\nFlute(margarete, osbourn) and forall x (Flute(x, osbourn) -> Flute(x, lynett)) -> therefore Flute(margarete, lynett) Flute(margarete, lynett) and forall x (Flute(x, lynett) -> Loaded(lynett)) -> therefore Loaded(lynett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The olympia welter the beverlee. The olympia does not see the aristotle. The olympia does not visit the beverlee. The beverlee is respective. The beverlee is unaltered. The adele does not need the aristotle. The adele welter the olympia. The aristotle is respective. The aristotle exhilarate the beverlee. The aristotle exhilarate the adele. If someone welter the olympia then they see the aristotle. If someone welter the aristotle then the aristotle is viii. The aristotle is not viii.", "logic": "\nWelter(olympia, beverlee)\nnot Welter(olympia, aristotle)\nnot Exhilarate(olympia, beverlee)\nRespective(beverlee)\nUnaltered(beverlee)\nnot Expunge(adele, aristotle)\nWelter(adele, olympia)\nRespective(aristotle)\nExhilarate(aristotle, beverlee)\nExhilarate(aristotle, adele)\nforall x (Welter(x, olympia) -> Welter(x, aristotle))\nforall x (Welter(x, aristotle) -> Viii(aristotle))\n\nnot Viii(aristotle)\n\nWelter(adele, olympia) and forall x (Welter(x, olympia) -> Welter(x, aristotle)) -> therefore Welter(adele, aristotle) Welter(adele, aristotle) and forall x (Welter(x, aristotle) -> Viii(aristotle)) -> therefore Viii(aristotle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The shanna rape the marybeth. The shanna does not see the fanny. The shanna does not visit the marybeth. The marybeth is wired. The marybeth is hinder. The jillane does not need the fanny. The jillane rape the shanna. The fanny is wired. The fanny behave the marybeth. The fanny behave the jillane. If someone rape the shanna then they see the fanny. If someone rape the fanny then the fanny is frilled. The fanny does not see the fanny.", "logic": "\nRape(shanna, marybeth)\nnot Rape(shanna, fanny)\nnot Behave(shanna, marybeth)\nWired(marybeth)\nHinder(marybeth)\nnot Ornament(jillane, fanny)\nRape(jillane, shanna)\nWired(fanny)\nBehave(fanny, marybeth)\nBehave(fanny, jillane)\nforall x (Rape(x, shanna) -> Rape(x, fanny))\nforall x (Rape(x, fanny) -> Frilled(fanny))\n\nnot Rape(fanny, fanny)\n\nforall x (Rape(x, shanna) -> Rape(x, fanny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The emmalynn attempt the waverley. The emmalynn does not see the geof. The emmalynn does not visit the waverley. The waverley is fraught. The waverley is puppylike. The adams does not need the geof. The adams attempt the emmalynn. The geof is fraught. The geof prepossess the waverley. The geof prepossess the adams. If someone attempt the emmalynn then they see the geof. If someone attempt the geof then the geof is opencut. The waverley attempt the geof.", "logic": "\nAttempt(emmalynn, waverley)\nnot Attempt(emmalynn, geof)\nnot Prepossess(emmalynn, waverley)\nFraught(waverley)\nPuppylike(waverley)\nnot Dull(adams, geof)\nAttempt(adams, emmalynn)\nFraught(geof)\nPrepossess(geof, waverley)\nPrepossess(geof, adams)\nforall x (Attempt(x, emmalynn) -> Attempt(x, geof))\nforall x (Attempt(x, geof) -> Opencut(geof))\n\nAttempt(waverley, geof)\n\nforall x (Attempt(x, emmalynn) -> Attempt(x, geof)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The petunia adumbrate the janeta. The petunia does not see the sibylla. The petunia does not visit the janeta. The janeta is painted. The janeta is nacreous. The son does not need the sibylla. The son adumbrate the petunia. The sibylla is painted. The sibylla sensualize the janeta. The sibylla sensualize the son. If someone adumbrate the petunia then they see the sibylla. If someone adumbrate the sibylla then the sibylla is urbane. The son does not see the son.", "logic": "\nAdumbrate(petunia, janeta)\nnot Adumbrate(petunia, sibylla)\nnot Sensualize(petunia, janeta)\nPainted(janeta)\nNacreous(janeta)\nnot Brag(son, sibylla)\nAdumbrate(son, petunia)\nPainted(sibylla)\nSensualize(sibylla, janeta)\nSensualize(sibylla, son)\nforall x (Adumbrate(x, petunia) -> Adumbrate(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Adumbrate(x, sibylla) -> Urbane(sibylla))\n\nnot Adumbrate(son, son)\n\nnot Adumbrate(son, son) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The vince begin the willamina. The vince does not see the angy. The vince does not visit the willamina. The willamina is variant. The willamina is yeatsian. The lucita does not need the angy. The lucita begin the vince. The angy is variant. The angy enshroud the willamina. The angy enshroud the lucita. If someone begin the vince then they see the angy. If someone begin the angy then the angy is hostile. The angy begin the vince.", "logic": "\nBegin(vince, willamina)\nnot Begin(vince, angy)\nnot Enshroud(vince, willamina)\nVariant(willamina)\nYeatsian(willamina)\nnot Conscript(lucita, angy)\nBegin(lucita, vince)\nVariant(angy)\nEnshroud(angy, willamina)\nEnshroud(angy, lucita)\nforall x (Begin(x, vince) -> Begin(x, angy))\nforall x (Begin(x, angy) -> Hostile(angy))\n\nBegin(angy, vince)\n\nBegin(angy, vince) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The sheilah degrease the dyan. The sheilah does not see the iago. The sheilah does not visit the dyan. The dyan is vitrified. The dyan is formulated. The fredric does not need the iago. The fredric degrease the sheilah. The iago is vitrified. The iago mutilate the dyan. The iago mutilate the fredric. If someone degrease the sheilah then they see the iago. If someone degrease the iago then the iago is votive. The dyan does not visit the sheilah.", "logic": "\nDegrease(sheilah, dyan)\nnot Degrease(sheilah, iago)\nnot Mutilate(sheilah, dyan)\nVitrified(dyan)\nFormulated(dyan)\nnot Hurtle(fredric, iago)\nDegrease(fredric, sheilah)\nVitrified(iago)\nMutilate(iago, dyan)\nMutilate(iago, fredric)\nforall x (Degrease(x, sheilah) -> Degrease(x, iago))\nforall x (Degrease(x, iago) -> Votive(iago))\n\nnot Mutilate(dyan, sheilah)\n\nnot Mutilate(dyan, sheilah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "The paulie savvy the tate. The paulie does not see the rikki. The paulie does not visit the tate. The tate is hostile. The tate is appalled. The aline does not need the rikki. The aline savvy the paulie. The rikki is hostile. The rikki cube the tate. The rikki cube the aline. If someone savvy the paulie then they see the rikki. If someone savvy the rikki then the rikki is blebbed. The paulie gnaw the aline.", "logic": "\nSavvy(paulie, tate)\nnot Savvy(paulie, rikki)\nnot Cube(paulie, tate)\nHostile(tate)\nAppalled(tate)\nnot Gnaw(aline, rikki)\nSavvy(aline, paulie)\nHostile(rikki)\nCube(rikki, tate)\nCube(rikki, aline)\nforall x (Savvy(x, paulie) -> Savvy(x, rikki))\nforall x (Savvy(x, rikki) -> Blebbed(rikki))\n\nGnaw(paulie, aline)\n\nGnaw(paulie, aline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-289"} {"premises": "Bertram is tracheal. Bertram is technical. Martie is doleful. Martie is tracheal. Prudence is not doleful. Prudence is not twiglike. Ellyn is pastel. Quiet things are twiglike. All twiglike, pastel things are flavorsome. All doleful things are not gracile. Blue, twiglike things are technical. If something is technical and not flavorsome then it is doleful. If something is twiglike and doleful then it is not tracheal. Martie is tracheal.", "logic": "\nTracheal(bertram)\nTechnical(bertram)\nDoleful(martie)\nTracheal(martie)\nnot Doleful(prudence)\nnot Twiglike(prudence)\nPastel(ellyn)\nforall x (Pastel(x) -> Twiglike(x))\nforall x (Twiglike(x) and Pastel(x) -> Flavorsome(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> not Gracile(x))\nforall x (Gracile(x) and Twiglike(x) -> Technical(x))\nforall x (Technical(x) and not Flavorsome(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Twiglike(x) and Doleful(x) -> not Tracheal(x))\n\nTracheal(martie)\n\ntherefore Tracheal(martie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Esther is smutty. Esther is astringent. Mae is blown. Mae is smutty. Gabey is not blown. Gabey is not marine. Latashia is traceable. Quiet things are marine. All marine, traceable things are molded. All blown things are not arranged. Blue, marine things are astringent. If something is astringent and not molded then it is blown. If something is marine and blown then it is not smutty. Esther is not astringent.", "logic": "\nSmutty(esther)\nAstringent(esther)\nBlown(mae)\nSmutty(mae)\nnot Blown(gabey)\nnot Marine(gabey)\nTraceable(latashia)\nforall x (Traceable(x) -> Marine(x))\nforall x (Marine(x) and Traceable(x) -> Molded(x))\nforall x (Blown(x) -> not Arranged(x))\nforall x (Arranged(x) and Marine(x) -> Astringent(x))\nforall x (Astringent(x) and not Molded(x) -> Blown(x))\nforall x (Marine(x) and Blown(x) -> not Smutty(x))\n\nnot Astringent(esther)\n\ntherefore Astringent(esther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Alyce is seamless. Alyce is lusterless. Rodolph is middling. Rodolph is seamless. Vincent is not middling. Vincent is not blotto. Miles is vitiated. Quiet things are blotto. All blotto, vitiated things are coseismal. All middling things are not proofed. Blue, blotto things are lusterless. If something is lusterless and not coseismal then it is middling. If something is blotto and middling then it is not seamless. Rodolph is not proofed.", "logic": "\nSeamless(alyce)\nLusterless(alyce)\nMiddling(rodolph)\nSeamless(rodolph)\nnot Middling(vincent)\nnot Blotto(vincent)\nVitiated(miles)\nforall x (Vitiated(x) -> Blotto(x))\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Vitiated(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> not Proofed(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) and Blotto(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) and not Coseismal(x) -> Middling(x))\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Middling(x) -> not Seamless(x))\n\nnot Proofed(rodolph)\n\nMiddling(rodolph) and forall x (Middling(x) -> not Proofed(x)) -> therefore not Proofed(rodolph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Malkah is unpotted. Malkah is directed. Selby is rutty. Selby is unpotted. Delphine is not rutty. Delphine is not untested. Brittan is cheerful. Quiet things are untested. All untested, cheerful things are apractic. All rutty things are not pentatonic. Blue, untested things are directed. If something is directed and not apractic then it is rutty. If something is untested and rutty then it is not unpotted. Brittan is not untested.", "logic": "\nUnpotted(malkah)\nDirected(malkah)\nRutty(selby)\nUnpotted(selby)\nnot Rutty(delphine)\nnot Untested(delphine)\nCheerful(brittan)\nforall x (Cheerful(x) -> Untested(x))\nforall x (Untested(x) and Cheerful(x) -> Apractic(x))\nforall x (Rutty(x) -> not Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) and Untested(x) -> Directed(x))\nforall x (Directed(x) and not Apractic(x) -> Rutty(x))\nforall x (Untested(x) and Rutty(x) -> not Unpotted(x))\n\nnot Untested(brittan)\n\nCheerful(brittan) and forall x (Cheerful(x) -> Untested(x)) -> therefore Untested(brittan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Flo is wifelike. Flo is funded. Phoebe is ultimo. Phoebe is wifelike. Monty is not ultimo. Monty is not laciniate. Clio is exotic. Quiet things are laciniate. All laciniate, exotic things are rwandan. All ultimo things are not knitted. Blue, laciniate things are funded. If something is funded and not rwandan then it is ultimo. If something is laciniate and ultimo then it is not wifelike. Clio is rwandan.", "logic": "\nWifelike(flo)\nFunded(flo)\nUltimo(phoebe)\nWifelike(phoebe)\nnot Ultimo(monty)\nnot Laciniate(monty)\nExotic(clio)\nforall x (Exotic(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Laciniate(x) and Exotic(x) -> Rwandan(x))\nforall x (Ultimo(x) -> not Knitted(x))\nforall x (Knitted(x) and Laciniate(x) -> Funded(x))\nforall x (Funded(x) and not Rwandan(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nforall x (Laciniate(x) and Ultimo(x) -> not Wifelike(x))\n\nRwandan(clio)\n\nExotic(clio) and forall x (Exotic(x) -> Laciniate(x)) -> therefore Laciniate(clio) Laciniate(clio) and Exotic(clio) and forall x (Laciniate(x) and Exotic(x) -> Rwandan(x)) -> therefore Rwandan(clio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Valery is unbooked. Valery is acanthotic. Oran is nugatory. Oran is unbooked. Michal is not nugatory. Michal is not semisoft. Verne is dandified. Quiet things are semisoft. All semisoft, dandified things are bedaubed. All nugatory things are not actuarial. Blue, semisoft things are acanthotic. If something is acanthotic and not bedaubed then it is nugatory. If something is semisoft and nugatory then it is not unbooked. Verne is not bedaubed.", "logic": "\nUnbooked(valery)\nAcanthotic(valery)\nNugatory(oran)\nUnbooked(oran)\nnot Nugatory(michal)\nnot Semisoft(michal)\nDandified(verne)\nforall x (Dandified(x) -> Semisoft(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) and Dandified(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> not Actuarial(x))\nforall x (Actuarial(x) and Semisoft(x) -> Acanthotic(x))\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) and not Bedaubed(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) and Nugatory(x) -> not Unbooked(x))\n\nnot Bedaubed(verne)\n\nDandified(verne) and forall x (Dandified(x) -> Semisoft(x)) -> therefore Semisoft(verne) Semisoft(verne) and Dandified(verne) and forall x (Semisoft(x) and Dandified(x) -> Bedaubed(x)) -> therefore Bedaubed(verne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Candis is extensile. Candis is blind. Jammie is positivist. Jammie is extensile. Carolin is not positivist. Carolin is not unbridled. Rosaline is appealable. Quiet things are unbridled. All unbridled, appealable things are denatured. All positivist things are not fond. Blue, unbridled things are blind. If something is blind and not denatured then it is positivist. If something is unbridled and positivist then it is not extensile. Candis is not positivist.", "logic": "\nExtensile(candis)\nBlind(candis)\nPositivist(jammie)\nExtensile(jammie)\nnot Positivist(carolin)\nnot Unbridled(carolin)\nAppealable(rosaline)\nforall x (Appealable(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) and Appealable(x) -> Denatured(x))\nforall x (Positivist(x) -> not Fond(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) and Unbridled(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) and not Denatured(x) -> Positivist(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) and Positivist(x) -> not Extensile(x))\n\nnot Positivist(candis)\n\nforall x (Blind(x) and not Denatured(x) -> Positivist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Bevvy is theatrical. Bevvy is unfamiliar. Ginger is unrifled. Ginger is theatrical. Karine is not unrifled. Karine is not implicated. Sammy is present. Quiet things are implicated. All implicated, present things are gangling. All unrifled things are not brinded. Blue, implicated things are unfamiliar. If something is unfamiliar and not gangling then it is unrifled. If something is implicated and unrifled then it is not theatrical. Ginger is gangling.", "logic": "\nTheatrical(bevvy)\nUnfamiliar(bevvy)\nUnrifled(ginger)\nTheatrical(ginger)\nnot Unrifled(karine)\nnot Implicated(karine)\nPresent(sammy)\nforall x (Present(x) -> Implicated(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Present(x) -> Gangling(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> not Brinded(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) and Implicated(x) -> Unfamiliar(x))\nforall x (Unfamiliar(x) and not Gangling(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Unrifled(x) -> not Theatrical(x))\n\nGangling(ginger)\n\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Present(x) -> Gangling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Reggie is atrophied. Reggie is hmong. Benedikta is balsamic. Benedikta is atrophied. Dorothee is not balsamic. Dorothee is not parasitic. Letti is tectonic. Quiet things are parasitic. All parasitic, tectonic things are sibyllic. All balsamic things are not topnotch. Blue, parasitic things are hmong. If something is hmong and not sibyllic then it is balsamic. If something is parasitic and balsamic then it is not atrophied. Benedikta is not parasitic.", "logic": "\nAtrophied(reggie)\nHmong(reggie)\nBalsamic(benedikta)\nAtrophied(benedikta)\nnot Balsamic(dorothee)\nnot Parasitic(dorothee)\nTectonic(letti)\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nforall x (Parasitic(x) and Tectonic(x) -> Sibyllic(x))\nforall x (Balsamic(x) -> not Topnotch(x))\nforall x (Topnotch(x) and Parasitic(x) -> Hmong(x))\nforall x (Hmong(x) and not Sibyllic(x) -> Balsamic(x))\nforall x (Parasitic(x) and Balsamic(x) -> not Atrophied(x))\n\nnot Parasitic(benedikta)\n\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Parasitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Simmonds is unbaptized. Simmonds is hematic. Ignazio is puppylike. Ignazio is unbaptized. Bertram is not puppylike. Bertram is not semitic. Callie is scrupulous. Quiet things are semitic. All semitic, scrupulous things are gloveless. All puppylike things are not embryotic. Blue, semitic things are hematic. If something is hematic and not gloveless then it is puppylike. If something is semitic and puppylike then it is not unbaptized. Callie is unbaptized.", "logic": "\nUnbaptized(simmonds)\nHematic(simmonds)\nPuppylike(ignazio)\nUnbaptized(ignazio)\nnot Puppylike(bertram)\nnot Semitic(bertram)\nScrupulous(callie)\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Semitic(x))\nforall x (Semitic(x) and Scrupulous(x) -> Gloveless(x))\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> not Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) and Semitic(x) -> Hematic(x))\nforall x (Hematic(x) and not Gloveless(x) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Semitic(x) and Puppylike(x) -> not Unbaptized(x))\n\nUnbaptized(callie)\n\nUnbaptized(callie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Jefferson is arrant. Jefferson is philippine. Gustave is stalemated. Gustave is arrant. Aprilette is not stalemated. Aprilette is not infernal. Secunda is earliest. Quiet things are infernal. All infernal, earliest things are molal. All stalemated things are not excursive. Blue, infernal things are philippine. If something is philippine and not molal then it is stalemated. If something is infernal and stalemated then it is not arrant. Secunda is not excursive.", "logic": "\nArrant(jefferson)\nPhilippine(jefferson)\nStalemated(gustave)\nArrant(gustave)\nnot Stalemated(aprilette)\nnot Infernal(aprilette)\nEarliest(secunda)\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Infernal(x))\nforall x (Infernal(x) and Earliest(x) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) -> not Excursive(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Infernal(x) -> Philippine(x))\nforall x (Philippine(x) and not Molal(x) -> Stalemated(x))\nforall x (Infernal(x) and Stalemated(x) -> not Arrant(x))\n\nnot Excursive(secunda)\n\nnot Excursive(secunda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Anet is laughing. Anet is sooty. Shirlee is ascetical. Shirlee is laughing. Marigold is not ascetical. Marigold is not nonhuman. Rogers is musical. Quiet things are nonhuman. All nonhuman, musical things are cetaceous. All ascetical things are not bearing. Blue, nonhuman things are sooty. If something is sooty and not cetaceous then it is ascetical. If something is nonhuman and ascetical then it is not laughing. Marigold is musical.", "logic": "\nLaughing(anet)\nSooty(anet)\nAscetical(shirlee)\nLaughing(shirlee)\nnot Ascetical(marigold)\nnot Nonhuman(marigold)\nMusical(rogers)\nforall x (Musical(x) -> Nonhuman(x))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) and Musical(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\nforall x (Ascetical(x) -> not Bearing(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) and Nonhuman(x) -> Sooty(x))\nforall x (Sooty(x) and not Cetaceous(x) -> Ascetical(x))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) and Ascetical(x) -> not Laughing(x))\n\nMusical(marigold)\n\nMusical(marigold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-644"} {"premises": "Val is podlike. Nola is not dioestrual. Koressa is bratty. Koressa is hortative. Elene is not bratty. Elene is not podlike. Elene is brisant. All brisant people are hortative. All pressed people are enjoyable. If someone is brisant and not hortative then they are not bratty. If someone is podlike and not hortative then they are bratty. If Koressa is bratty then Koressa is podlike. All podlike people are not dioestrual. Koressa is bratty.", "logic": "\nPodlike(val)\nnot Dioestrual(nola)\nBratty(koressa)\nHortative(koressa)\nnot Bratty(elene)\nnot Podlike(elene)\nBrisant(elene)\nforall x (Brisant(x) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\nforall x (Brisant(x) and not Hortative(x) -> not Bratty(x))\nforall x (Podlike(x) and not Hortative(x) -> Bratty(x))\nBratty(koressa) -> Podlike(koressa)\nforall x (Podlike(x) -> not Dioestrual(x))\n\nBratty(koressa)\n\ntherefore Bratty(koressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Jonas is disclike. Obadiah is not critical. Rori is steely. Rori is broken. Amity is not steely. Amity is not disclike. Amity is consumable. All consumable people are broken. All enmeshed people are endearing. If someone is consumable and not broken then they are not steely. If someone is disclike and not broken then they are steely. If Rori is steely then Rori is disclike. All disclike people are not critical. Jonas is not disclike.", "logic": "\nDisclike(jonas)\nnot Critical(obadiah)\nSteely(rori)\nBroken(rori)\nnot Steely(amity)\nnot Disclike(amity)\nConsumable(amity)\nforall x (Consumable(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Enmeshed(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Consumable(x) and not Broken(x) -> not Steely(x))\nforall x (Disclike(x) and not Broken(x) -> Steely(x))\nSteely(rori) -> Disclike(rori)\nforall x (Disclike(x) -> not Critical(x))\n\nnot Disclike(jonas)\n\ntherefore Disclike(jonas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Griswold is neotenic. Robbert is not taoist. Rollin is persuasive. Rollin is induced. Melisse is not persuasive. Melisse is not neotenic. Melisse is reportable. All reportable people are induced. All compounded people are becoming. If someone is reportable and not induced then they are not persuasive. If someone is neotenic and not induced then they are persuasive. If Rollin is persuasive then Rollin is neotenic. All neotenic people are not taoist. Melisse is induced.", "logic": "\nNeotenic(griswold)\nnot Taoist(robbert)\nPersuasive(rollin)\nInduced(rollin)\nnot Persuasive(melisse)\nnot Neotenic(melisse)\nReportable(melisse)\nforall x (Reportable(x) -> Induced(x))\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> Becoming(x))\nforall x (Reportable(x) and not Induced(x) -> not Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) and not Induced(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nPersuasive(rollin) -> Neotenic(rollin)\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> not Taoist(x))\n\nInduced(melisse)\n\nReportable(melisse) and forall x (Reportable(x) -> Induced(x)) -> therefore Induced(melisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Sergeant is psychotic. Vivianne is not unheaded. Hunt is bland. Hunt is residuary. Carolynn is not bland. Carolynn is not psychotic. Carolynn is feverous. All feverous people are residuary. All addictive people are lavish. If someone is feverous and not residuary then they are not bland. If someone is psychotic and not residuary then they are bland. If Hunt is bland then Hunt is psychotic. All psychotic people are not unheaded. Carolynn is not residuary.", "logic": "\nPsychotic(sergeant)\nnot Unheaded(vivianne)\nBland(hunt)\nResiduary(hunt)\nnot Bland(carolynn)\nnot Psychotic(carolynn)\nFeverous(carolynn)\nforall x (Feverous(x) -> Residuary(x))\nforall x (Addictive(x) -> Lavish(x))\nforall x (Feverous(x) and not Residuary(x) -> not Bland(x))\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and not Residuary(x) -> Bland(x))\nBland(hunt) -> Psychotic(hunt)\nforall x (Psychotic(x) -> not Unheaded(x))\n\nnot Residuary(carolynn)\n\nFeverous(carolynn) and forall x (Feverous(x) -> Residuary(x)) -> therefore Residuary(carolynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Dolly is tweedy. Klee is not morbific. Barnabe is pianistic. Barnabe is paid. Elberta is not pianistic. Elberta is not tweedy. Elberta is harmonized. All harmonized people are paid. All fragmented people are anamnestic. If someone is harmonized and not paid then they are not pianistic. If someone is tweedy and not paid then they are pianistic. If Barnabe is pianistic then Barnabe is tweedy. All tweedy people are not morbific. Barnabe is not morbific.", "logic": "\nTweedy(dolly)\nnot Morbific(klee)\nPianistic(barnabe)\nPaid(barnabe)\nnot Pianistic(elberta)\nnot Tweedy(elberta)\nHarmonized(elberta)\nforall x (Harmonized(x) -> Paid(x))\nforall x (Fragmented(x) -> Anamnestic(x))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and not Paid(x) -> not Pianistic(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and not Paid(x) -> Pianistic(x))\nPianistic(barnabe) -> Tweedy(barnabe)\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> not Morbific(x))\n\nnot Morbific(barnabe)\n\nPianistic(barnabe) and Pianistic(barnabe) -> Tweedy(barnabe) -> therefore Tweedy(barnabe) Tweedy(barnabe) and forall x (Tweedy(x) -> not Morbific(x)) -> therefore not Morbific(barnabe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Isabelita is luscious. Mabel is not configured. Carmelle is vacant. Carmelle is neglectful. Katina is not vacant. Katina is not luscious. Katina is deadlocked. All deadlocked people are neglectful. All ungroomed people are regional. If someone is deadlocked and not neglectful then they are not vacant. If someone is luscious and not neglectful then they are vacant. If Carmelle is vacant then Carmelle is luscious. All luscious people are not configured. Carmelle is configured.", "logic": "\nLuscious(isabelita)\nnot Configured(mabel)\nVacant(carmelle)\nNeglectful(carmelle)\nnot Vacant(katina)\nnot Luscious(katina)\nDeadlocked(katina)\nforall x (Deadlocked(x) -> Neglectful(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Regional(x))\nforall x (Deadlocked(x) and not Neglectful(x) -> not Vacant(x))\nforall x (Luscious(x) and not Neglectful(x) -> Vacant(x))\nVacant(carmelle) -> Luscious(carmelle)\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> not Configured(x))\n\nConfigured(carmelle)\n\nVacant(carmelle) and Vacant(carmelle) -> Luscious(carmelle) -> therefore Luscious(carmelle) Luscious(carmelle) and forall x (Luscious(x) -> not Configured(x)) -> therefore not Configured(carmelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Hasheem is natural. Ladonna is not lapidary. Irma is unrefined. Irma is centigrade. Horatio is not unrefined. Horatio is not natural. Horatio is venezuelan. All venezuelan people are centigrade. All bullocky people are ventral. If someone is venezuelan and not centigrade then they are not unrefined. If someone is natural and not centigrade then they are unrefined. If Irma is unrefined then Irma is natural. All natural people are not lapidary. Hasheem is not centigrade.", "logic": "\nNatural(hasheem)\nnot Lapidary(ladonna)\nUnrefined(irma)\nCentigrade(irma)\nnot Unrefined(horatio)\nnot Natural(horatio)\nVenezuelan(horatio)\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) -> Centigrade(x))\nforall x (Bullocky(x) -> Ventral(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and not Centigrade(x) -> not Unrefined(x))\nforall x (Natural(x) and not Centigrade(x) -> Unrefined(x))\nUnrefined(irma) -> Natural(irma)\nforall x (Natural(x) -> not Lapidary(x))\n\nnot Centigrade(hasheem)\n\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) -> Centigrade(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Hart is flexible. Tiana is not sneering. Giorgia is calcuttan. Giorgia is anomic. Nissa is not calcuttan. Nissa is not flexible. Nissa is cityfied. All cityfied people are anomic. All vertebral people are unloving. If someone is cityfied and not anomic then they are not calcuttan. If someone is flexible and not anomic then they are calcuttan. If Giorgia is calcuttan then Giorgia is flexible. All flexible people are not sneering. Hart is unloving.", "logic": "\nFlexible(hart)\nnot Sneering(tiana)\nCalcuttan(giorgia)\nAnomic(giorgia)\nnot Calcuttan(nissa)\nnot Flexible(nissa)\nCityfied(nissa)\nforall x (Cityfied(x) -> Anomic(x))\nforall x (Vertebral(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Cityfied(x) and not Anomic(x) -> not Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Flexible(x) and not Anomic(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nCalcuttan(giorgia) -> Flexible(giorgia)\nforall x (Flexible(x) -> not Sneering(x))\n\nUnloving(hart)\n\nforall x (Vertebral(x) -> Unloving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Amos is unowned. Julianna is not anorthic. Maryjo is sibylline. Maryjo is asinine. Ella is not sibylline. Ella is not unowned. Ella is leaden. All leaden people are asinine. All employable people are worthless. If someone is leaden and not asinine then they are not sibylline. If someone is unowned and not asinine then they are sibylline. If Maryjo is sibylline then Maryjo is unowned. All unowned people are not anorthic. Julianna is not sibylline.", "logic": "\nUnowned(amos)\nnot Anorthic(julianna)\nSibylline(maryjo)\nAsinine(maryjo)\nnot Sibylline(ella)\nnot Unowned(ella)\nLeaden(ella)\nforall x (Leaden(x) -> Asinine(x))\nforall x (Employable(x) -> Worthless(x))\nforall x (Leaden(x) and not Asinine(x) -> not Sibylline(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) and not Asinine(x) -> Sibylline(x))\nSibylline(maryjo) -> Unowned(maryjo)\nforall x (Unowned(x) -> not Anorthic(x))\n\nnot Sibylline(julianna)\n\nforall x (Unowned(x) and not Asinine(x) -> Sibylline(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Lauralee is tearaway. Palmer is not filipino. Walter is blunted. Walter is fijian. Kirby is not blunted. Kirby is not tearaway. Kirby is shaded. All shaded people are fijian. All finical people are irksome. If someone is shaded and not fijian then they are not blunted. If someone is tearaway and not fijian then they are blunted. If Walter is blunted then Walter is tearaway. All tearaway people are not filipino. Palmer is shaded.", "logic": "\nTearaway(lauralee)\nnot Filipino(palmer)\nBlunted(walter)\nFijian(walter)\nnot Blunted(kirby)\nnot Tearaway(kirby)\nShaded(kirby)\nforall x (Shaded(x) -> Fijian(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Shaded(x) and not Fijian(x) -> not Blunted(x))\nforall x (Tearaway(x) and not Fijian(x) -> Blunted(x))\nBlunted(walter) -> Tearaway(walter)\nforall x (Tearaway(x) -> not Filipino(x))\n\nShaded(palmer)\n\nShaded(palmer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Brena is unironed. Tobye is not coseismal. Lorrie is insoluble. Lorrie is bothersome. Siana is not insoluble. Siana is not unironed. Siana is ransomed. All ransomed people are bothersome. All basal people are aseptic. If someone is ransomed and not bothersome then they are not insoluble. If someone is unironed and not bothersome then they are insoluble. If Lorrie is insoluble then Lorrie is unironed. All unironed people are not coseismal. Brena is not basal.", "logic": "\nUnironed(brena)\nnot Coseismal(tobye)\nInsoluble(lorrie)\nBothersome(lorrie)\nnot Insoluble(siana)\nnot Unironed(siana)\nRansomed(siana)\nforall x (Ransomed(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Aseptic(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and not Bothersome(x) -> not Insoluble(x))\nforall x (Unironed(x) and not Bothersome(x) -> Insoluble(x))\nInsoluble(lorrie) -> Unironed(lorrie)\nforall x (Unironed(x) -> not Coseismal(x))\n\nnot Basal(brena)\n\nnot Basal(brena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Franciska is pointed. Cornellis is not antiguan. Mildrid is pilar. Mildrid is undramatic. Misty is not pilar. Misty is not pointed. Misty is comely. All comely people are undramatic. All unpermed people are azotic. If someone is comely and not undramatic then they are not pilar. If someone is pointed and not undramatic then they are pilar. If Mildrid is pilar then Mildrid is pointed. All pointed people are not antiguan. Mildrid is unpermed.", "logic": "\nPointed(franciska)\nnot Antiguan(cornellis)\nPilar(mildrid)\nUndramatic(mildrid)\nnot Pilar(misty)\nnot Pointed(misty)\nComely(misty)\nforall x (Comely(x) -> Undramatic(x))\nforall x (Unpermed(x) -> Azotic(x))\nforall x (Comely(x) and not Undramatic(x) -> not Pilar(x))\nforall x (Pointed(x) and not Undramatic(x) -> Pilar(x))\nPilar(mildrid) -> Pointed(mildrid)\nforall x (Pointed(x) -> not Antiguan(x))\n\nUnpermed(mildrid)\n\nUnpermed(mildrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1616"} {"premises": "Julissa is socialist. Julissa is dreamy. Julissa is amazed. Hermia is amazed. Hermia is navicular. Veronique is socialist. Veronique is navicular. Stefanie is not dreamy. Stefanie is amazed. Stefanie is navicular. If someone is dreamy and navicular then they are protean. If someone is socialist then they are navicular. Hermia is navicular.", "logic": "\nSocialist(julissa)\nDreamy(julissa)\nAmazed(julissa)\nAmazed(hermia)\nNavicular(hermia)\nSocialist(veronique)\nNavicular(veronique)\nnot Dreamy(stefanie)\nAmazed(stefanie)\nNavicular(stefanie)\nforall x (Dreamy(x) and Navicular(x) -> Protean(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> Navicular(x))\n\nNavicular(hermia)\n\ntherefore Navicular(hermia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Gere is knobby. Gere is permeable. Gere is charitable. Fazeel is charitable. Fazeel is sweet. Christel is knobby. Christel is sweet. Bellamy is not permeable. Bellamy is charitable. Bellamy is sweet. If someone is permeable and sweet then they are phlegmy. If someone is knobby then they are sweet. Gere is not charitable.", "logic": "\nKnobby(gere)\nPermeable(gere)\nCharitable(gere)\nCharitable(fazeel)\nSweet(fazeel)\nKnobby(christel)\nSweet(christel)\nnot Permeable(bellamy)\nCharitable(bellamy)\nSweet(bellamy)\nforall x (Permeable(x) and Sweet(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\nforall x (Knobby(x) -> Sweet(x))\n\nnot Charitable(gere)\n\ntherefore Charitable(gere)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Sholom is quaint. Sholom is valueless. Sholom is craved. Brian is craved. Brian is pantropic. Neda is quaint. Neda is pantropic. Lynnett is not valueless. Lynnett is craved. Lynnett is pantropic. If someone is valueless and pantropic then they are jejune. If someone is quaint then they are pantropic. Sholom is pantropic.", "logic": "\nQuaint(sholom)\nValueless(sholom)\nCraved(sholom)\nCraved(brian)\nPantropic(brian)\nQuaint(neda)\nPantropic(neda)\nnot Valueless(lynnett)\nCraved(lynnett)\nPantropic(lynnett)\nforall x (Valueless(x) and Pantropic(x) -> Jejune(x))\nforall x (Quaint(x) -> Pantropic(x))\n\nPantropic(sholom)\n\nQuaint(sholom) and forall x (Quaint(x) -> Pantropic(x)) -> therefore Pantropic(sholom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Dionysus is ablated. Dionysus is trifoliate. Dionysus is outraged. Blake is outraged. Blake is downward. Willi is ablated. Willi is downward. Susanna is not trifoliate. Susanna is outraged. Susanna is downward. If someone is trifoliate and downward then they are cubelike. If someone is ablated then they are downward. Dionysus is not downward.", "logic": "\nAblated(dionysus)\nTrifoliate(dionysus)\nOutraged(dionysus)\nOutraged(blake)\nDownward(blake)\nAblated(willi)\nDownward(willi)\nnot Trifoliate(susanna)\nOutraged(susanna)\nDownward(susanna)\nforall x (Trifoliate(x) and Downward(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Ablated(x) -> Downward(x))\n\nnot Downward(dionysus)\n\nAblated(dionysus) and forall x (Ablated(x) -> Downward(x)) -> therefore Downward(dionysus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Gifford is butcherly. Gifford is flavourous. Gifford is bifurcate. Celestyna is bifurcate. Celestyna is deepening. Priscella is butcherly. Priscella is deepening. Lydia is not flavourous. Lydia is bifurcate. Lydia is deepening. If someone is flavourous and deepening then they are unaltered. If someone is butcherly then they are deepening. Gifford is unaltered.", "logic": "\nButcherly(gifford)\nFlavourous(gifford)\nBifurcate(gifford)\nBifurcate(celestyna)\nDeepening(celestyna)\nButcherly(priscella)\nDeepening(priscella)\nnot Flavourous(lydia)\nBifurcate(lydia)\nDeepening(lydia)\nforall x (Flavourous(x) and Deepening(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Deepening(x))\n\nUnaltered(gifford)\n\nButcherly(gifford) and forall x (Butcherly(x) -> Deepening(x)) -> therefore Deepening(gifford) Flavourous(gifford) and Deepening(gifford) and forall x (Flavourous(x) and Deepening(x) -> Unaltered(x)) -> therefore Unaltered(gifford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Allie is grotesque. Allie is andante. Allie is opposite. Mella is opposite. Mella is lxiv. Marie is grotesque. Marie is lxiv. Rosita is not andante. Rosita is opposite. Rosita is lxiv. If someone is andante and lxiv then they are vibratory. If someone is grotesque then they are lxiv. Allie is not vibratory.", "logic": "\nGrotesque(allie)\nAndante(allie)\nOpposite(allie)\nOpposite(mella)\nLxiv(mella)\nGrotesque(marie)\nLxiv(marie)\nnot Andante(rosita)\nOpposite(rosita)\nLxiv(rosita)\nforall x (Andante(x) and Lxiv(x) -> Vibratory(x))\nforall x (Grotesque(x) -> Lxiv(x))\n\nnot Vibratory(allie)\n\nGrotesque(allie) and forall x (Grotesque(x) -> Lxiv(x)) -> therefore Lxiv(allie) Andante(allie) and Lxiv(allie) and forall x (Andante(x) and Lxiv(x) -> Vibratory(x)) -> therefore Vibratory(allie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Tyne is nonsweet. Tyne is exogamic. Tyne is skinny. Michael is skinny. Michael is misguided. Joyan is nonsweet. Joyan is misguided. Kurtis is not exogamic. Kurtis is skinny. Kurtis is misguided. If someone is exogamic and misguided then they are unsatiable. If someone is nonsweet then they are misguided. Michael is not unsatiable.", "logic": "\nNonsweet(tyne)\nExogamic(tyne)\nSkinny(tyne)\nSkinny(michael)\nMisguided(michael)\nNonsweet(joyan)\nMisguided(joyan)\nnot Exogamic(kurtis)\nSkinny(kurtis)\nMisguided(kurtis)\nforall x (Exogamic(x) and Misguided(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nforall x (Nonsweet(x) -> Misguided(x))\n\nnot Unsatiable(michael)\n\nforall x (Exogamic(x) and Misguided(x) -> Unsatiable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Grete is imputable. Grete is cuspated. Grete is theist. Hallie is theist. Hallie is blithe. Rhoda is imputable. Rhoda is blithe. Hanson is not cuspated. Hanson is theist. Hanson is blithe. If someone is cuspated and blithe then they are consuming. If someone is imputable then they are blithe. Hanson is consuming.", "logic": "\nImputable(grete)\nCuspated(grete)\nTheist(grete)\nTheist(hallie)\nBlithe(hallie)\nImputable(rhoda)\nBlithe(rhoda)\nnot Cuspated(hanson)\nTheist(hanson)\nBlithe(hanson)\nforall x (Cuspated(x) and Blithe(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> Blithe(x))\n\nConsuming(hanson)\n\nforall x (Cuspated(x) and Blithe(x) -> Consuming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Shani is unknown. Shani is riblike. Shani is abdominous. Isaac is abdominous. Isaac is eared. Cosmo is unknown. Cosmo is eared. Daloris is not riblike. Daloris is abdominous. Daloris is eared. If someone is riblike and eared then they are plaintive. If someone is unknown then they are eared. Cosmo is not plaintive.", "logic": "\nUnknown(shani)\nRiblike(shani)\nAbdominous(shani)\nAbdominous(isaac)\nEared(isaac)\nUnknown(cosmo)\nEared(cosmo)\nnot Riblike(daloris)\nAbdominous(daloris)\nEared(daloris)\nforall x (Riblike(x) and Eared(x) -> Plaintive(x))\nforall x (Unknown(x) -> Eared(x))\n\nnot Plaintive(cosmo)\n\nforall x (Riblike(x) and Eared(x) -> Plaintive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Gwyneth is unsaved. Gwyneth is thyrotoxic. Gwyneth is felonious. Hervey is felonious. Hervey is busybodied. Kristan is unsaved. Kristan is busybodied. Hoyt is not thyrotoxic. Hoyt is felonious. Hoyt is busybodied. If someone is thyrotoxic and busybodied then they are extended. If someone is unsaved then they are busybodied. Hervey is thyrotoxic.", "logic": "\nUnsaved(gwyneth)\nThyrotoxic(gwyneth)\nFelonious(gwyneth)\nFelonious(hervey)\nBusybodied(hervey)\nUnsaved(kristan)\nBusybodied(kristan)\nnot Thyrotoxic(hoyt)\nFelonious(hoyt)\nBusybodied(hoyt)\nforall x (Thyrotoxic(x) and Busybodied(x) -> Extended(x))\nforall x (Unsaved(x) -> Busybodied(x))\n\nThyrotoxic(hervey)\n\nThyrotoxic(hervey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Flori is nonlexical. Flori is albanian. Flori is lxxi. Cathe is lxxi. Cathe is ignitable. Angele is nonlexical. Angele is ignitable. Yancey is not albanian. Yancey is lxxi. Yancey is ignitable. If someone is albanian and ignitable then they are shrimpy. If someone is nonlexical then they are ignitable. Cathe is not nonlexical.", "logic": "\nNonlexical(flori)\nAlbanian(flori)\nLxxi(flori)\nLxxi(cathe)\nIgnitable(cathe)\nNonlexical(angele)\nIgnitable(angele)\nnot Albanian(yancey)\nLxxi(yancey)\nIgnitable(yancey)\nforall x (Albanian(x) and Ignitable(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Nonlexical(x) -> Ignitable(x))\n\nnot Nonlexical(cathe)\n\nnot Nonlexical(cathe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Lukas is loony. Lukas is unformed. Lukas is despiteful. Harrietta is despiteful. Harrietta is amber. Becka is loony. Becka is amber. Robinette is not unformed. Robinette is despiteful. Robinette is amber. If someone is unformed and amber then they are minuscular. If someone is loony then they are amber. Becka is unformed.", "logic": "\nLoony(lukas)\nUnformed(lukas)\nDespiteful(lukas)\nDespiteful(harrietta)\nAmber(harrietta)\nLoony(becka)\nAmber(becka)\nnot Unformed(robinette)\nDespiteful(robinette)\nAmber(robinette)\nforall x (Unformed(x) and Amber(x) -> Minuscular(x))\nforall x (Loony(x) -> Amber(x))\n\nUnformed(becka)\n\nUnformed(becka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1818"} {"premises": "Yelena is entranced. Shanta is censorious. Shanta is sentient. If someone is earthy and entranced then they are russian. Green people are isocyclic. If someone is sentient then they are censorious. Cold people are sentient. If someone is earthy then they are russian. If Yelena is isocyclic then Yelena is stern. Shanta is censorious.", "logic": "\nEntranced(yelena)\nCensorious(shanta)\nSentient(shanta)\nforall x (Earthy(x) and Entranced(x) -> Russian(x))\nforall x (Entranced(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\nforall x (Sentient(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Earthy(x) -> Sentient(x))\nforall x (Earthy(x) -> Russian(x))\nIsocyclic(yelena) -> Stern(yelena)\n\nCensorious(shanta)\n\ntherefore Censorious(shanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Jimmie is starting. Richardo is indelicate. Richardo is enabling. If someone is resupine and starting then they are flashy. Green people are benthonic. If someone is enabling then they are indelicate. Cold people are enabling. If someone is resupine then they are flashy. If Jimmie is benthonic then Jimmie is chylific. Jimmie is not starting.", "logic": "\nStarting(jimmie)\nIndelicate(richardo)\nEnabling(richardo)\nforall x (Resupine(x) and Starting(x) -> Flashy(x))\nforall x (Starting(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nforall x (Enabling(x) -> Indelicate(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) -> Flashy(x))\nBenthonic(jimmie) -> Chylific(jimmie)\n\nnot Starting(jimmie)\n\ntherefore Starting(jimmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Darice is icteric. Eugine is catarrhine. Eugine is bladed. If someone is beheaded and icteric then they are japanese. Green people are inducive. If someone is bladed then they are catarrhine. Cold people are bladed. If someone is beheaded then they are japanese. If Darice is inducive then Darice is appetitive. Darice is inducive.", "logic": "\nIcteric(darice)\nCatarrhine(eugine)\nBladed(eugine)\nforall x (Beheaded(x) and Icteric(x) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Beheaded(x) -> Bladed(x))\nforall x (Beheaded(x) -> Japanese(x))\nInducive(darice) -> Appetitive(darice)\n\nInducive(darice)\n\nIcteric(darice) and forall x (Icteric(x) -> Inducive(x)) -> therefore Inducive(darice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Hester is factual. Cynthie is undue. Cynthie is octal. If someone is chylaceous and factual then they are selfsame. Green people are meek. If someone is octal then they are undue. Cold people are octal. If someone is chylaceous then they are selfsame. If Hester is meek then Hester is windburnt. Hester is not meek.", "logic": "\nFactual(hester)\nUndue(cynthie)\nOctal(cynthie)\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) and Factual(x) -> Selfsame(x))\nforall x (Factual(x) -> Meek(x))\nforall x (Octal(x) -> Undue(x))\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) -> Octal(x))\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) -> Selfsame(x))\nMeek(hester) -> Windburnt(hester)\n\nnot Meek(hester)\n\nFactual(hester) and forall x (Factual(x) -> Meek(x)) -> therefore Meek(hester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Adger is monovalent. Gratiana is immotile. Gratiana is sciatic. If someone is amendable and monovalent then they are catamenial. Green people are handheld. If someone is sciatic then they are immotile. Cold people are sciatic. If someone is amendable then they are catamenial. If Adger is handheld then Adger is aneuploid. Adger is aneuploid.", "logic": "\nMonovalent(adger)\nImmotile(gratiana)\nSciatic(gratiana)\nforall x (Amendable(x) and Monovalent(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Monovalent(x) -> Handheld(x))\nforall x (Sciatic(x) -> Immotile(x))\nforall x (Amendable(x) -> Sciatic(x))\nforall x (Amendable(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nHandheld(adger) -> Aneuploid(adger)\n\nAneuploid(adger)\n\nMonovalent(adger) and forall x (Monovalent(x) -> Handheld(x)) -> therefore Handheld(adger) Handheld(adger) and Handheld(adger) -> Aneuploid(adger) -> therefore Aneuploid(adger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Yevette is hematal. Chrissy is consummate. Chrissy is herculean. If someone is cybernetic and hematal then they are teasing. Green people are halt. If someone is herculean then they are consummate. Cold people are herculean. If someone is cybernetic then they are teasing. If Yevette is halt then Yevette is shoeless. Yevette is not shoeless.", "logic": "\nHematal(yevette)\nConsummate(chrissy)\nHerculean(chrissy)\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) and Hematal(x) -> Teasing(x))\nforall x (Hematal(x) -> Halt(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) -> Herculean(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) -> Teasing(x))\nHalt(yevette) -> Shoeless(yevette)\n\nnot Shoeless(yevette)\n\nHematal(yevette) and forall x (Hematal(x) -> Halt(x)) -> therefore Halt(yevette) Halt(yevette) and Halt(yevette) -> Shoeless(yevette) -> therefore Shoeless(yevette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Sharity is teen. Burnaby is catoptric. Burnaby is confucian. If someone is lapidary and teen then they are thickened. Green people are monumental. If someone is confucian then they are catoptric. Cold people are confucian. If someone is lapidary then they are thickened. If Sharity is monumental then Sharity is threatened. Burnaby is not thickened.", "logic": "\nTeen(sharity)\nCatoptric(burnaby)\nConfucian(burnaby)\nforall x (Lapidary(x) and Teen(x) -> Thickened(x))\nforall x (Teen(x) -> Monumental(x))\nforall x (Confucian(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Confucian(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Thickened(x))\nMonumental(sharity) -> Threatened(sharity)\n\nnot Thickened(burnaby)\n\nforall x (Lapidary(x) and Teen(x) -> Thickened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Barde is exclusive. Easton is untanned. Easton is vacuolate. If someone is totaled and exclusive then they are legendary. Green people are juristic. If someone is vacuolate then they are untanned. Cold people are vacuolate. If someone is totaled then they are legendary. If Barde is juristic then Barde is foxy. Barde is vacuolate.", "logic": "\nExclusive(barde)\nUntanned(easton)\nVacuolate(easton)\nforall x (Totaled(x) and Exclusive(x) -> Legendary(x))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) -> Juristic(x))\nforall x (Vacuolate(x) -> Untanned(x))\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Vacuolate(x))\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Legendary(x))\nJuristic(barde) -> Foxy(barde)\n\nVacuolate(barde)\n\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Vacuolate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Malcah is thrillful. Katherine is odious. Katherine is glowering. If someone is grayish and thrillful then they are ornamental. Green people are depraved. If someone is glowering then they are odious. Cold people are glowering. If someone is grayish then they are ornamental. If Malcah is depraved then Malcah is mini. Malcah is not odious.", "logic": "\nThrillful(malcah)\nOdious(katherine)\nGlowering(katherine)\nforall x (Grayish(x) and Thrillful(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Glowering(x) -> Odious(x))\nforall x (Grayish(x) -> Glowering(x))\nforall x (Grayish(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nDepraved(malcah) -> Mini(malcah)\n\nnot Odious(malcah)\n\nforall x (Glowering(x) -> Odious(x)) <- forall x (Grayish(x) -> Glowering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Samuella is entangled. Darin is adust. Darin is settled. If someone is overactive and entangled then they are idealised. Green people are yearly. If someone is settled then they are adust. Cold people are settled. If someone is overactive then they are idealised. If Samuella is yearly then Samuella is smoked. Darin is smoked.", "logic": "\nEntangled(samuella)\nAdust(darin)\nSettled(darin)\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Entangled(x) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Entangled(x) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Settled(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Idealised(x))\nYearly(samuella) -> Smoked(samuella)\n\nSmoked(darin)\n\nSmoked(darin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Cary is summery. Sophi is shallow. Sophi is variform. If someone is motile and summery then they are custom. Green people are rayless. If someone is variform then they are shallow. Cold people are variform. If someone is motile then they are custom. If Cary is rayless then Cary is marvelous. Sophi is not summery.", "logic": "\nSummery(cary)\nShallow(sophi)\nVariform(sophi)\nforall x (Motile(x) and Summery(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Variform(x) -> Shallow(x))\nforall x (Motile(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Motile(x) -> Custom(x))\nRayless(cary) -> Marvelous(cary)\n\nnot Summery(sophi)\n\nnot Summery(sophi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "Libbi is ramose. Cresa is assurgent. Cresa is neoliberal. If someone is baritone and ramose then they are determined. Green people are stodgy. If someone is neoliberal then they are assurgent. Cold people are neoliberal. If someone is baritone then they are determined. If Libbi is stodgy then Libbi is pricey. Cresa is baritone.", "logic": "\nRamose(libbi)\nAssurgent(cresa)\nNeoliberal(cresa)\nforall x (Baritone(x) and Ramose(x) -> Determined(x))\nforall x (Ramose(x) -> Stodgy(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Assurgent(x))\nforall x (Baritone(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (Baritone(x) -> Determined(x))\nStodgy(libbi) -> Pricey(libbi)\n\nBaritone(cresa)\n\nBaritone(cresa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1715"} {"premises": "The glynn sing the julia. The glynn dispense the julia. The glynn harden the julia. The emlynn is shaped. The emlynn is pyrolignic. The emlynn harden the glynn. The emlynn harden the julia. The julia sing the emlynn. The julia dispense the glynn. The julia is zymotic. The julia is shaped. The julia does not see the emlynn. If the emlynn dispense the julia and the julia does not eat the emlynn then the emlynn dispense the glynn. If the julia harden the emlynn and the julia is not zymotic then the emlynn is wily. If someone is zymotic then they eat the julia. If the emlynn is wily then the emlynn dispense the julia. If someone dispense the julia then the julia does not see the glynn. If someone dispense the julia then they are pyrolignic. If the emlynn sing the julia then the emlynn is zymotic. If someone sing the julia and they do not eat the julia then they do not eat the glynn. The emlynn is shaped.", "logic": "\nSing(glynn, julia)\nDispense(glynn, julia)\nHarden(glynn, julia)\nShaped(emlynn)\nPyrolignic(emlynn)\nHarden(emlynn, glynn)\nHarden(emlynn, julia)\nSing(julia, emlynn)\nDispense(julia, glynn)\nZymotic(julia)\nShaped(julia)\nnot Harden(julia, emlynn)\nDispense(emlynn, julia) and not Dispense(julia, emlynn) -> Dispense(emlynn, glynn)\nHarden(julia, emlynn) and not Zymotic(julia) -> Wily(emlynn)\nforall x (Zymotic(x) -> Dispense(x, julia))\nWily(emlynn) -> Dispense(emlynn, julia)\nforall x (Dispense(x, julia) -> not Harden(julia, glynn))\nforall x (Dispense(x, julia) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nSing(emlynn, julia) -> Zymotic(emlynn)\nforall x (Sing(x, julia) and not Dispense(x, julia) -> not Dispense(x, glynn))\n\nShaped(emlynn)\n\ntherefore Shaped(emlynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The marten epitomize the averyl. The marten fraternize the averyl. The marten solemnise the averyl. The stacee is bloodless. The stacee is disklike. The stacee solemnise the marten. The stacee solemnise the averyl. The averyl epitomize the stacee. The averyl fraternize the marten. The averyl is gratis. The averyl is bloodless. The averyl does not see the stacee. If the stacee fraternize the averyl and the averyl does not eat the stacee then the stacee fraternize the marten. If the averyl solemnise the stacee and the averyl is not gratis then the stacee is struck. If someone is gratis then they eat the averyl. If the stacee is struck then the stacee fraternize the averyl. If someone fraternize the averyl then the averyl does not see the marten. If someone fraternize the averyl then they are disklike. If the stacee epitomize the averyl then the stacee is gratis. If someone epitomize the averyl and they do not eat the averyl then they do not eat the marten. The marten does not eat the averyl.", "logic": "\nEpitomize(marten, averyl)\nFraternize(marten, averyl)\nSolemnise(marten, averyl)\nBloodless(stacee)\nDisklike(stacee)\nSolemnise(stacee, marten)\nSolemnise(stacee, averyl)\nEpitomize(averyl, stacee)\nFraternize(averyl, marten)\nGratis(averyl)\nBloodless(averyl)\nnot Solemnise(averyl, stacee)\nFraternize(stacee, averyl) and not Fraternize(averyl, stacee) -> Fraternize(stacee, marten)\nSolemnise(averyl, stacee) and not Gratis(averyl) -> Struck(stacee)\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> Fraternize(x, averyl))\nStruck(stacee) -> Fraternize(stacee, averyl)\nforall x (Fraternize(x, averyl) -> not Solemnise(averyl, marten))\nforall x (Fraternize(x, averyl) -> Disklike(x))\nEpitomize(stacee, averyl) -> Gratis(stacee)\nforall x (Epitomize(x, averyl) and not Fraternize(x, averyl) -> not Fraternize(x, marten))\n\nnot Fraternize(marten, averyl)\n\ntherefore Fraternize(marten, averyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The liliane invaginate the tiler. The liliane economise the tiler. The liliane distemper the tiler. The dionis is relaxant. The dionis is alarmed. The dionis distemper the liliane. The dionis distemper the tiler. The tiler invaginate the dionis. The tiler economise the liliane. The tiler is uneatable. The tiler is relaxant. The tiler does not see the dionis. If the dionis economise the tiler and the tiler does not eat the dionis then the dionis economise the liliane. If the tiler distemper the dionis and the tiler is not uneatable then the dionis is reeking. If someone is uneatable then they eat the tiler. If the dionis is reeking then the dionis economise the tiler. If someone economise the tiler then the tiler does not see the liliane. If someone economise the tiler then they are alarmed. If the dionis invaginate the tiler then the dionis is uneatable. If someone invaginate the tiler and they do not eat the tiler then they do not eat the liliane. The liliane is alarmed.", "logic": "\nInvaginate(liliane, tiler)\nEconomise(liliane, tiler)\nDistemper(liliane, tiler)\nRelaxant(dionis)\nAlarmed(dionis)\nDistemper(dionis, liliane)\nDistemper(dionis, tiler)\nInvaginate(tiler, dionis)\nEconomise(tiler, liliane)\nUneatable(tiler)\nRelaxant(tiler)\nnot Distemper(tiler, dionis)\nEconomise(dionis, tiler) and not Economise(tiler, dionis) -> Economise(dionis, liliane)\nDistemper(tiler, dionis) and not Uneatable(tiler) -> Reeking(dionis)\nforall x (Uneatable(x) -> Economise(x, tiler))\nReeking(dionis) -> Economise(dionis, tiler)\nforall x (Economise(x, tiler) -> not Distemper(tiler, liliane))\nforall x (Economise(x, tiler) -> Alarmed(x))\nInvaginate(dionis, tiler) -> Uneatable(dionis)\nforall x (Invaginate(x, tiler) and not Economise(x, tiler) -> not Economise(x, liliane))\n\nAlarmed(liliane)\n\nEconomise(liliane, tiler) and forall x (Economise(x, tiler) -> Alarmed(x)) -> therefore Alarmed(liliane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The timmi prostitute the matt. The timmi inform the matt. The timmi bombard the matt. The jefferson is piddling. The jefferson is forficate. The jefferson bombard the timmi. The jefferson bombard the matt. The matt prostitute the jefferson. The matt inform the timmi. The matt is sulphuric. The matt is piddling. The matt does not see the jefferson. If the jefferson inform the matt and the matt does not eat the jefferson then the jefferson inform the timmi. If the matt bombard the jefferson and the matt is not sulphuric then the jefferson is appetizing. If someone is sulphuric then they eat the matt. If the jefferson is appetizing then the jefferson inform the matt. If someone inform the matt then the matt does not see the timmi. If someone inform the matt then they are forficate. If the jefferson prostitute the matt then the jefferson is sulphuric. If someone prostitute the matt and they do not eat the matt then they do not eat the timmi. The matt bombard the timmi.", "logic": "\nProstitute(timmi, matt)\nInform(timmi, matt)\nBombard(timmi, matt)\nPiddling(jefferson)\nForficate(jefferson)\nBombard(jefferson, timmi)\nBombard(jefferson, matt)\nProstitute(matt, jefferson)\nInform(matt, timmi)\nSulphuric(matt)\nPiddling(matt)\nnot Bombard(matt, jefferson)\nInform(jefferson, matt) and not Inform(matt, jefferson) -> Inform(jefferson, timmi)\nBombard(matt, jefferson) and not Sulphuric(matt) -> Appetizing(jefferson)\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Inform(x, matt))\nAppetizing(jefferson) -> Inform(jefferson, matt)\nforall x (Inform(x, matt) -> not Bombard(matt, timmi))\nforall x (Inform(x, matt) -> Forficate(x))\nProstitute(jefferson, matt) -> Sulphuric(jefferson)\nforall x (Prostitute(x, matt) and not Inform(x, matt) -> not Inform(x, timmi))\n\nBombard(matt, timmi)\n\nInform(timmi, matt) and forall x (Inform(x, matt) -> not Bombard(matt, timmi)) -> therefore not Bombard(matt, timmi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The correna dado the shayne. The correna criticise the shayne. The correna demystify the shayne. The ramon is bionomical. The ramon is napping. The ramon demystify the correna. The ramon demystify the shayne. The shayne dado the ramon. The shayne criticise the correna. The shayne is perverted. The shayne is bionomical. The shayne does not see the ramon. If the ramon criticise the shayne and the shayne does not eat the ramon then the ramon criticise the correna. If the shayne demystify the ramon and the shayne is not perverted then the ramon is spooky. If someone is perverted then they eat the shayne. If the ramon is spooky then the ramon criticise the shayne. If someone criticise the shayne then the shayne does not see the correna. If someone criticise the shayne then they are napping. If the ramon dado the shayne then the ramon is perverted. If someone dado the shayne and they do not eat the shayne then they do not eat the correna. The shayne is napping.", "logic": "\nDado(correna, shayne)\nCriticise(correna, shayne)\nDemystify(correna, shayne)\nBionomical(ramon)\nNapping(ramon)\nDemystify(ramon, correna)\nDemystify(ramon, shayne)\nDado(shayne, ramon)\nCriticise(shayne, correna)\nPerverted(shayne)\nBionomical(shayne)\nnot Demystify(shayne, ramon)\nCriticise(ramon, shayne) and not Criticise(shayne, ramon) -> Criticise(ramon, correna)\nDemystify(shayne, ramon) and not Perverted(shayne) -> Spooky(ramon)\nforall x (Perverted(x) -> Criticise(x, shayne))\nSpooky(ramon) -> Criticise(ramon, shayne)\nforall x (Criticise(x, shayne) -> not Demystify(shayne, correna))\nforall x (Criticise(x, shayne) -> Napping(x))\nDado(ramon, shayne) -> Perverted(ramon)\nforall x (Dado(x, shayne) and not Criticise(x, shayne) -> not Criticise(x, correna))\n\nNapping(shayne)\n\nPerverted(shayne) and forall x (Perverted(x) -> Criticise(x, shayne)) -> therefore Criticise(shayne, shayne) Criticise(shayne, shayne) and forall x (Criticise(x, shayne) -> Napping(x)) -> therefore Napping(shayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The neddy hope the sheffy. The neddy arraign the sheffy. The neddy exact the sheffy. The geneva is taken. The geneva is completed. The geneva exact the neddy. The geneva exact the sheffy. The sheffy hope the geneva. The sheffy arraign the neddy. The sheffy is ugly. The sheffy is taken. The sheffy does not see the geneva. If the geneva arraign the sheffy and the sheffy does not eat the geneva then the geneva arraign the neddy. If the sheffy exact the geneva and the sheffy is not ugly then the geneva is partitive. If someone is ugly then they eat the sheffy. If the geneva is partitive then the geneva arraign the sheffy. If someone arraign the sheffy then the sheffy does not see the neddy. If someone arraign the sheffy then they are completed. If the geneva hope the sheffy then the geneva is ugly. If someone hope the sheffy and they do not eat the sheffy then they do not eat the neddy. The sheffy is not completed.", "logic": "\nHope(neddy, sheffy)\nArraign(neddy, sheffy)\nExact(neddy, sheffy)\nTaken(geneva)\nCompleted(geneva)\nExact(geneva, neddy)\nExact(geneva, sheffy)\nHope(sheffy, geneva)\nArraign(sheffy, neddy)\nUgly(sheffy)\nTaken(sheffy)\nnot Exact(sheffy, geneva)\nArraign(geneva, sheffy) and not Arraign(sheffy, geneva) -> Arraign(geneva, neddy)\nExact(sheffy, geneva) and not Ugly(sheffy) -> Partitive(geneva)\nforall x (Ugly(x) -> Arraign(x, sheffy))\nPartitive(geneva) -> Arraign(geneva, sheffy)\nforall x (Arraign(x, sheffy) -> not Exact(sheffy, neddy))\nforall x (Arraign(x, sheffy) -> Completed(x))\nHope(geneva, sheffy) -> Ugly(geneva)\nforall x (Hope(x, sheffy) and not Arraign(x, sheffy) -> not Arraign(x, neddy))\n\nnot Completed(sheffy)\n\nUgly(sheffy) and forall x (Ugly(x) -> Arraign(x, sheffy)) -> therefore Arraign(sheffy, sheffy) Arraign(sheffy, sheffy) and forall x (Arraign(x, sheffy) -> Completed(x)) -> therefore Completed(sheffy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The enrico kindle the marshal. The enrico scaffold the marshal. The enrico moisturize the marshal. The daria is maverick. The daria is dipterous. The daria moisturize the enrico. The daria moisturize the marshal. The marshal kindle the daria. The marshal scaffold the enrico. The marshal is stupid. The marshal is maverick. The marshal does not see the daria. If the daria scaffold the marshal and the marshal does not eat the daria then the daria scaffold the enrico. If the marshal moisturize the daria and the marshal is not stupid then the daria is modified. If someone is stupid then they eat the marshal. If the daria is modified then the daria scaffold the marshal. If someone scaffold the marshal then the marshal does not see the enrico. If someone scaffold the marshal then they are dipterous. If the daria kindle the marshal then the daria is stupid. If someone kindle the marshal and they do not eat the marshal then they do not eat the enrico. The daria does not eat the marshal.", "logic": "\nKindle(enrico, marshal)\nScaffold(enrico, marshal)\nMoisturize(enrico, marshal)\nMaverick(daria)\nDipterous(daria)\nMoisturize(daria, enrico)\nMoisturize(daria, marshal)\nKindle(marshal, daria)\nScaffold(marshal, enrico)\nStupid(marshal)\nMaverick(marshal)\nnot Moisturize(marshal, daria)\nScaffold(daria, marshal) and not Scaffold(marshal, daria) -> Scaffold(daria, enrico)\nMoisturize(marshal, daria) and not Stupid(marshal) -> Modified(daria)\nforall x (Stupid(x) -> Scaffold(x, marshal))\nModified(daria) -> Scaffold(daria, marshal)\nforall x (Scaffold(x, marshal) -> not Moisturize(marshal, enrico))\nforall x (Scaffold(x, marshal) -> Dipterous(x))\nKindle(daria, marshal) -> Stupid(daria)\nforall x (Kindle(x, marshal) and not Scaffold(x, marshal) -> not Scaffold(x, enrico))\n\nnot Scaffold(daria, marshal)\n\nforall x (Stupid(x) -> Scaffold(x, marshal)) <- Kindle(daria, marshal) -> Stupid(daria) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The chip enforce the tish. The chip butterfly the tish. The chip kowtow the tish. The augustus is bigeneric. The augustus is caliginous. The augustus kowtow the chip. The augustus kowtow the tish. The tish enforce the augustus. The tish butterfly the chip. The tish is egoistic. The tish is bigeneric. The tish does not see the augustus. If the augustus butterfly the tish and the tish does not eat the augustus then the augustus butterfly the chip. If the tish kowtow the augustus and the tish is not egoistic then the augustus is prime. If someone is egoistic then they eat the tish. If the augustus is prime then the augustus butterfly the tish. If someone butterfly the tish then the tish does not see the chip. If someone butterfly the tish then they are caliginous. If the augustus enforce the tish then the augustus is egoistic. If someone enforce the tish and they do not eat the tish then they do not eat the chip. The augustus butterfly the chip.", "logic": "\nEnforce(chip, tish)\nButterfly(chip, tish)\nKowtow(chip, tish)\nBigeneric(augustus)\nCaliginous(augustus)\nKowtow(augustus, chip)\nKowtow(augustus, tish)\nEnforce(tish, augustus)\nButterfly(tish, chip)\nEgoistic(tish)\nBigeneric(tish)\nnot Kowtow(tish, augustus)\nButterfly(augustus, tish) and not Butterfly(tish, augustus) -> Butterfly(augustus, chip)\nKowtow(tish, augustus) and not Egoistic(tish) -> Prime(augustus)\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Butterfly(x, tish))\nPrime(augustus) -> Butterfly(augustus, tish)\nforall x (Butterfly(x, tish) -> not Kowtow(tish, chip))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, tish) -> Caliginous(x))\nEnforce(augustus, tish) -> Egoistic(augustus)\nforall x (Enforce(x, tish) and not Butterfly(x, tish) -> not Butterfly(x, chip))\n\nButterfly(augustus, chip)\n\nButterfly(augustus, tish) and not Butterfly(tish, augustus) -> Butterfly(augustus, chip) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The yolande splosh the berri. The yolande slick the berri. The yolande relapse the berri. The joell is capsulate. The joell is foolhardy. The joell relapse the yolande. The joell relapse the berri. The berri splosh the joell. The berri slick the yolande. The berri is alopecic. The berri is capsulate. The berri does not see the joell. If the joell slick the berri and the berri does not eat the joell then the joell slick the yolande. If the berri relapse the joell and the berri is not alopecic then the joell is scary. If someone is alopecic then they eat the berri. If the joell is scary then the joell slick the berri. If someone slick the berri then the berri does not see the yolande. If someone slick the berri then they are foolhardy. If the joell splosh the berri then the joell is alopecic. If someone splosh the berri and they do not eat the berri then they do not eat the yolande. The joell is not alopecic.", "logic": "\nSplosh(yolande, berri)\nSlick(yolande, berri)\nRelapse(yolande, berri)\nCapsulate(joell)\nFoolhardy(joell)\nRelapse(joell, yolande)\nRelapse(joell, berri)\nSplosh(berri, joell)\nSlick(berri, yolande)\nAlopecic(berri)\nCapsulate(berri)\nnot Relapse(berri, joell)\nSlick(joell, berri) and not Slick(berri, joell) -> Slick(joell, yolande)\nRelapse(berri, joell) and not Alopecic(berri) -> Scary(joell)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> Slick(x, berri))\nScary(joell) -> Slick(joell, berri)\nforall x (Slick(x, berri) -> not Relapse(berri, yolande))\nforall x (Slick(x, berri) -> Foolhardy(x))\nSplosh(joell, berri) -> Alopecic(joell)\nforall x (Splosh(x, berri) and not Slick(x, berri) -> not Slick(x, yolande))\n\nnot Alopecic(joell)\n\nSplosh(joell, berri) -> Alopecic(joell) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The revkah sidle the uriah. The revkah staunch the uriah. The revkah chin the uriah. The bertine is orange. The bertine is aerobic. The bertine chin the revkah. The bertine chin the uriah. The uriah sidle the bertine. The uriah staunch the revkah. The uriah is jade. The uriah is orange. The uriah does not see the bertine. If the bertine staunch the uriah and the uriah does not eat the bertine then the bertine staunch the revkah. If the uriah chin the bertine and the uriah is not jade then the bertine is testicular. If someone is jade then they eat the uriah. If the bertine is testicular then the bertine staunch the uriah. If someone staunch the uriah then the uriah does not see the revkah. If someone staunch the uriah then they are aerobic. If the bertine sidle the uriah then the bertine is jade. If someone sidle the uriah and they do not eat the uriah then they do not eat the revkah. The revkah is jade.", "logic": "\nSidle(revkah, uriah)\nStaunch(revkah, uriah)\nChin(revkah, uriah)\nOrange(bertine)\nAerobic(bertine)\nChin(bertine, revkah)\nChin(bertine, uriah)\nSidle(uriah, bertine)\nStaunch(uriah, revkah)\nJade(uriah)\nOrange(uriah)\nnot Chin(uriah, bertine)\nStaunch(bertine, uriah) and not Staunch(uriah, bertine) -> Staunch(bertine, revkah)\nChin(uriah, bertine) and not Jade(uriah) -> Testicular(bertine)\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Staunch(x, uriah))\nTesticular(bertine) -> Staunch(bertine, uriah)\nforall x (Staunch(x, uriah) -> not Chin(uriah, revkah))\nforall x (Staunch(x, uriah) -> Aerobic(x))\nSidle(bertine, uriah) -> Jade(bertine)\nforall x (Sidle(x, uriah) and not Staunch(x, uriah) -> not Staunch(x, revkah))\n\nJade(revkah)\n\nJade(revkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The sparky seal the jonas. The sparky birr the jonas. The sparky wrack the jonas. The ray is uncharted. The ray is worth. The ray wrack the sparky. The ray wrack the jonas. The jonas seal the ray. The jonas birr the sparky. The jonas is heady. The jonas is uncharted. The jonas does not see the ray. If the ray birr the jonas and the jonas does not eat the ray then the ray birr the sparky. If the jonas wrack the ray and the jonas is not heady then the ray is backhand. If someone is heady then they eat the jonas. If the ray is backhand then the ray birr the jonas. If someone birr the jonas then the jonas does not see the sparky. If someone birr the jonas then they are worth. If the ray seal the jonas then the ray is heady. If someone seal the jonas and they do not eat the jonas then they do not eat the sparky. The sparky does not see the ray.", "logic": "\nSeal(sparky, jonas)\nBirr(sparky, jonas)\nWrack(sparky, jonas)\nUncharted(ray)\nWorth(ray)\nWrack(ray, sparky)\nWrack(ray, jonas)\nSeal(jonas, ray)\nBirr(jonas, sparky)\nHeady(jonas)\nUncharted(jonas)\nnot Wrack(jonas, ray)\nBirr(ray, jonas) and not Birr(jonas, ray) -> Birr(ray, sparky)\nWrack(jonas, ray) and not Heady(jonas) -> Backhand(ray)\nforall x (Heady(x) -> Birr(x, jonas))\nBackhand(ray) -> Birr(ray, jonas)\nforall x (Birr(x, jonas) -> not Wrack(jonas, sparky))\nforall x (Birr(x, jonas) -> Worth(x))\nSeal(ray, jonas) -> Heady(ray)\nforall x (Seal(x, jonas) and not Birr(x, jonas) -> not Birr(x, sparky))\n\nnot Wrack(sparky, ray)\n\nnot Wrack(sparky, ray) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The erda moult the mahmoud. The erda disaccord the mahmoud. The erda assemble the mahmoud. The merrilee is flighted. The merrilee is mucose. The merrilee assemble the erda. The merrilee assemble the mahmoud. The mahmoud moult the merrilee. The mahmoud disaccord the erda. The mahmoud is sanctioned. The mahmoud is flighted. The mahmoud does not see the merrilee. If the merrilee disaccord the mahmoud and the mahmoud does not eat the merrilee then the merrilee disaccord the erda. If the mahmoud assemble the merrilee and the mahmoud is not sanctioned then the merrilee is exchanged. If someone is sanctioned then they eat the mahmoud. If the merrilee is exchanged then the merrilee disaccord the mahmoud. If someone disaccord the mahmoud then the mahmoud does not see the erda. If someone disaccord the mahmoud then they are mucose. If the merrilee moult the mahmoud then the merrilee is sanctioned. If someone moult the mahmoud and they do not eat the mahmoud then they do not eat the erda. The erda disaccord the merrilee.", "logic": "\nMoult(erda, mahmoud)\nDisaccord(erda, mahmoud)\nAssemble(erda, mahmoud)\nFlighted(merrilee)\nMucose(merrilee)\nAssemble(merrilee, erda)\nAssemble(merrilee, mahmoud)\nMoult(mahmoud, merrilee)\nDisaccord(mahmoud, erda)\nSanctioned(mahmoud)\nFlighted(mahmoud)\nnot Assemble(mahmoud, merrilee)\nDisaccord(merrilee, mahmoud) and not Disaccord(mahmoud, merrilee) -> Disaccord(merrilee, erda)\nAssemble(mahmoud, merrilee) and not Sanctioned(mahmoud) -> Exchanged(merrilee)\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) -> Disaccord(x, mahmoud))\nExchanged(merrilee) -> Disaccord(merrilee, mahmoud)\nforall x (Disaccord(x, mahmoud) -> not Assemble(mahmoud, erda))\nforall x (Disaccord(x, mahmoud) -> Mucose(x))\nMoult(merrilee, mahmoud) -> Sanctioned(merrilee)\nforall x (Moult(x, mahmoud) and not Disaccord(x, mahmoud) -> not Disaccord(x, erda))\n\nDisaccord(erda, merrilee)\n\nDisaccord(erda, merrilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "Cathy is crustacean. Cathy is mutualist. Roselyn is subnormal. Roselyn is mutualist. Roselyn is mismatched. Riannon is crustacean. Riannon is caesarean. Kind people are caesarean. Nice people are caesarean. Big, mutualist people are caesarean. If someone is caesarean and subnormal then they are concealing. Nice, mutualist people are concealing. Smart, caesarean people are corked. Big, corked people are crustacean. If someone is subnormal and concealing then they are corked. Riannon is crustacean.", "logic": "\nCrustacean(cathy)\nMutualist(cathy)\nSubnormal(roselyn)\nMutualist(roselyn)\nMismatched(roselyn)\nCrustacean(riannon)\nCaesarean(riannon)\nforall x (Mutualist(x) -> Caesarean(x))\nforall x (Corked(x) -> Caesarean(x))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) and Mutualist(x) -> Caesarean(x))\nforall x (Caesarean(x) and Subnormal(x) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Corked(x) and Mutualist(x) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Mismatched(x) and Caesarean(x) -> Corked(x))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) and Corked(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) and Concealing(x) -> Corked(x))\n\nCrustacean(riannon)\n\ntherefore Crustacean(riannon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Karlee is melodic. Karlee is horizontal. Tammi is livelong. Tammi is horizontal. Tammi is flatulent. Nanete is melodic. Nanete is mined. Kind people are mined. Nice people are mined. Big, horizontal people are mined. If someone is mined and livelong then they are inarguable. Nice, horizontal people are inarguable. Smart, mined people are thalassic. Big, thalassic people are melodic. If someone is livelong and inarguable then they are thalassic. Nanete is not mined.", "logic": "\nMelodic(karlee)\nHorizontal(karlee)\nLivelong(tammi)\nHorizontal(tammi)\nFlatulent(tammi)\nMelodic(nanete)\nMined(nanete)\nforall x (Horizontal(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Thalassic(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and Horizontal(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) and Livelong(x) -> Inarguable(x))\nforall x (Thalassic(x) and Horizontal(x) -> Inarguable(x))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) and Mined(x) -> Thalassic(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and Thalassic(x) -> Melodic(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and Inarguable(x) -> Thalassic(x))\n\nnot Mined(nanete)\n\ntherefore Mined(nanete)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Cody is touristed. Cody is inflowing. Antin is honeyed. Antin is inflowing. Antin is salivary. Ana is touristed. Ana is womanly. Kind people are womanly. Nice people are womanly. Big, inflowing people are womanly. If someone is womanly and honeyed then they are lincolnian. Nice, inflowing people are lincolnian. Smart, womanly people are uncolored. Big, uncolored people are touristed. If someone is honeyed and lincolnian then they are uncolored. Cody is womanly.", "logic": "\nTouristed(cody)\nInflowing(cody)\nHoneyed(antin)\nInflowing(antin)\nSalivary(antin)\nTouristed(ana)\nWomanly(ana)\nforall x (Inflowing(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) and Inflowing(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Honeyed(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and Inflowing(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nforall x (Salivary(x) and Womanly(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) and Uncolored(x) -> Touristed(x))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) and Lincolnian(x) -> Uncolored(x))\n\nWomanly(cody)\n\nInflowing(cody) and forall x (Inflowing(x) -> Womanly(x)) -> therefore Womanly(cody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Grove is lossless. Grove is unbigoted. Oliver is stricken. Oliver is unbigoted. Oliver is plebeian. Julietta is lossless. Julietta is condolent. Kind people are condolent. Nice people are condolent. Big, unbigoted people are condolent. If someone is condolent and stricken then they are mismated. Nice, unbigoted people are mismated. Smart, condolent people are aneurismal. Big, aneurismal people are lossless. If someone is stricken and mismated then they are aneurismal. Grove is not condolent.", "logic": "\nLossless(grove)\nUnbigoted(grove)\nStricken(oliver)\nUnbigoted(oliver)\nPlebeian(oliver)\nLossless(julietta)\nCondolent(julietta)\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Condolent(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Condolent(x))\nforall x (Stricken(x) and Unbigoted(x) -> Condolent(x))\nforall x (Condolent(x) and Stricken(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) and Unbigoted(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Plebeian(x) and Condolent(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\nforall x (Stricken(x) and Aneurismal(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Stricken(x) and Mismated(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\n\nnot Condolent(grove)\n\nUnbigoted(grove) and forall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Condolent(x)) -> therefore Condolent(grove)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Harmonia is tangible. Harmonia is humdrum. Tawsha is homologic. Tawsha is humdrum. Tawsha is freeborn. Mikey is tangible. Mikey is acanthoid. Kind people are acanthoid. Nice people are acanthoid. Big, humdrum people are acanthoid. If someone is acanthoid and homologic then they are human. Nice, humdrum people are human. Smart, acanthoid people are nascent. Big, nascent people are tangible. If someone is homologic and human then they are nascent. Tawsha is human.", "logic": "\nTangible(harmonia)\nHumdrum(harmonia)\nHomologic(tawsha)\nHumdrum(tawsha)\nFreeborn(tawsha)\nTangible(mikey)\nAcanthoid(mikey)\nforall x (Humdrum(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) and Humdrum(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) and Homologic(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and Humdrum(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Freeborn(x) and Acanthoid(x) -> Nascent(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) and Nascent(x) -> Tangible(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) and Human(x) -> Nascent(x))\n\nHuman(tawsha)\n\nHumdrum(tawsha) and forall x (Humdrum(x) -> Acanthoid(x)) -> therefore Acanthoid(tawsha) Acanthoid(tawsha) and Homologic(tawsha) and forall x (Acanthoid(x) and Homologic(x) -> Human(x)) -> therefore Human(tawsha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Isadore is blinded. Isadore is inherited. Srinivas is buttonlike. Srinivas is inherited. Srinivas is camp. Ernaline is blinded. Ernaline is sciatic. Kind people are sciatic. Nice people are sciatic. Big, inherited people are sciatic. If someone is sciatic and buttonlike then they are algonkian. Nice, inherited people are algonkian. Smart, sciatic people are soporific. Big, soporific people are blinded. If someone is buttonlike and algonkian then they are soporific. Srinivas is not algonkian.", "logic": "\nBlinded(isadore)\nInherited(isadore)\nButtonlike(srinivas)\nInherited(srinivas)\nCamp(srinivas)\nBlinded(ernaline)\nSciatic(ernaline)\nforall x (Inherited(x) -> Sciatic(x))\nforall x (Soporific(x) -> Sciatic(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) and Inherited(x) -> Sciatic(x))\nforall x (Sciatic(x) and Buttonlike(x) -> Algonkian(x))\nforall x (Soporific(x) and Inherited(x) -> Algonkian(x))\nforall x (Camp(x) and Sciatic(x) -> Soporific(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) and Soporific(x) -> Blinded(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) and Algonkian(x) -> Soporific(x))\n\nnot Algonkian(srinivas)\n\nInherited(srinivas) and forall x (Inherited(x) -> Sciatic(x)) -> therefore Sciatic(srinivas) Sciatic(srinivas) and Buttonlike(srinivas) and forall x (Sciatic(x) and Buttonlike(x) -> Algonkian(x)) -> therefore Algonkian(srinivas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Lamb is ammoniac. Lamb is uninitiate. Angelika is euphoriant. Angelika is uninitiate. Angelika is magnetised. Carma is ammoniac. Carma is guinean. Kind people are guinean. Nice people are guinean. Big, uninitiate people are guinean. If someone is guinean and euphoriant then they are touchy. Nice, uninitiate people are touchy. Smart, guinean people are sheeny. Big, sheeny people are ammoniac. If someone is euphoriant and touchy then they are sheeny. Lamb is not touchy.", "logic": "\nAmmoniac(lamb)\nUninitiate(lamb)\nEuphoriant(angelika)\nUninitiate(angelika)\nMagnetised(angelika)\nAmmoniac(carma)\nGuinean(carma)\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Sheeny(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Guinean(x) and Euphoriant(x) -> Touchy(x))\nforall x (Sheeny(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Touchy(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) and Guinean(x) -> Sheeny(x))\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) and Sheeny(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) and Touchy(x) -> Sheeny(x))\n\nnot Touchy(lamb)\n\nforall x (Sheeny(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Touchy(x)) <- forall x (Magnetised(x) and Guinean(x) -> Sheeny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Marlo is dastard. Marlo is scoreless. Tammara is sociable. Tammara is scoreless. Tammara is pinkish. Robinia is dastard. Robinia is scoured. Kind people are scoured. Nice people are scoured. Big, scoreless people are scoured. If someone is scoured and sociable then they are unshielded. Nice, scoreless people are unshielded. Smart, scoured people are britannic. Big, britannic people are dastard. If someone is sociable and unshielded then they are britannic. Marlo is britannic.", "logic": "\nDastard(marlo)\nScoreless(marlo)\nSociable(tammara)\nScoreless(tammara)\nPinkish(tammara)\nDastard(robinia)\nScoured(robinia)\nforall x (Scoreless(x) -> Scoured(x))\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Scoured(x))\nforall x (Sociable(x) and Scoreless(x) -> Scoured(x))\nforall x (Scoured(x) and Sociable(x) -> Unshielded(x))\nforall x (Britannic(x) and Scoreless(x) -> Unshielded(x))\nforall x (Pinkish(x) and Scoured(x) -> Britannic(x))\nforall x (Sociable(x) and Britannic(x) -> Dastard(x))\nforall x (Sociable(x) and Unshielded(x) -> Britannic(x))\n\nBritannic(marlo)\n\nforall x (Pinkish(x) and Scoured(x) -> Britannic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Tiena is apostate. Tiena is climactic. Julissa is barbed. Julissa is climactic. Julissa is botuliform. Lorrie is apostate. Lorrie is flavorful. Kind people are flavorful. Nice people are flavorful. Big, climactic people are flavorful. If someone is flavorful and barbed then they are envious. Nice, climactic people are envious. Smart, flavorful people are groggy. Big, groggy people are apostate. If someone is barbed and envious then they are groggy. Lorrie is not envious.", "logic": "\nApostate(tiena)\nClimactic(tiena)\nBarbed(julissa)\nClimactic(julissa)\nBotuliform(julissa)\nApostate(lorrie)\nFlavorful(lorrie)\nforall x (Climactic(x) -> Flavorful(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) -> Flavorful(x))\nforall x (Barbed(x) and Climactic(x) -> Flavorful(x))\nforall x (Flavorful(x) and Barbed(x) -> Envious(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) and Climactic(x) -> Envious(x))\nforall x (Botuliform(x) and Flavorful(x) -> Groggy(x))\nforall x (Barbed(x) and Groggy(x) -> Apostate(x))\nforall x (Barbed(x) and Envious(x) -> Groggy(x))\n\nnot Envious(lorrie)\n\nforall x (Flavorful(x) and Barbed(x) -> Envious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Aubrie is unwilling. Aubrie is original. Nevsa is jangly. Nevsa is original. Nevsa is dictated. Chadwick is unwilling. Chadwick is lettered. Kind people are lettered. Nice people are lettered. Big, original people are lettered. If someone is lettered and jangly then they are tinkly. Nice, original people are tinkly. Smart, lettered people are birch. Big, birch people are unwilling. If someone is jangly and tinkly then they are birch. Aubrie is dictated.", "logic": "\nUnwilling(aubrie)\nOriginal(aubrie)\nJangly(nevsa)\nOriginal(nevsa)\nDictated(nevsa)\nUnwilling(chadwick)\nLettered(chadwick)\nforall x (Original(x) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Birch(x) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) and Original(x) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Jangly(x) -> Tinkly(x))\nforall x (Birch(x) and Original(x) -> Tinkly(x))\nforall x (Dictated(x) and Lettered(x) -> Birch(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) and Birch(x) -> Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) and Tinkly(x) -> Birch(x))\n\nDictated(aubrie)\n\nDictated(aubrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Gwenni is unadvised. Gwenni is disturbing. Billy is homocyclic. Billy is disturbing. Billy is tearaway. Genevra is unadvised. Genevra is lossless. Kind people are lossless. Nice people are lossless. Big, disturbing people are lossless. If someone is lossless and homocyclic then they are touristy. Nice, disturbing people are touristy. Smart, lossless people are placeable. Big, placeable people are unadvised. If someone is homocyclic and touristy then they are placeable. Genevra is not homocyclic.", "logic": "\nUnadvised(gwenni)\nDisturbing(gwenni)\nHomocyclic(billy)\nDisturbing(billy)\nTearaway(billy)\nUnadvised(genevra)\nLossless(genevra)\nforall x (Disturbing(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Placeable(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and Disturbing(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Lossless(x) and Homocyclic(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Placeable(x) and Disturbing(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Tearaway(x) and Lossless(x) -> Placeable(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and Placeable(x) -> Unadvised(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and Touristy(x) -> Placeable(x))\n\nnot Homocyclic(genevra)\n\nnot Homocyclic(genevra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Maryanna is unoriginal. Maryanna is warmed. Kenn is militant. Kenn is warmed. Kenn is euphonical. Carmelia is unoriginal. Carmelia is monolithic. Kind people are monolithic. Nice people are monolithic. Big, warmed people are monolithic. If someone is monolithic and militant then they are abandoned. Nice, warmed people are abandoned. Smart, monolithic people are humid. Big, humid people are unoriginal. If someone is militant and abandoned then they are humid. Maryanna is militant.", "logic": "\nUnoriginal(maryanna)\nWarmed(maryanna)\nMilitant(kenn)\nWarmed(kenn)\nEuphonical(kenn)\nUnoriginal(carmelia)\nMonolithic(carmelia)\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Humid(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Militant(x) and Warmed(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Monolithic(x) and Militant(x) -> Abandoned(x))\nforall x (Humid(x) and Warmed(x) -> Abandoned(x))\nforall x (Euphonical(x) and Monolithic(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Militant(x) and Humid(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nforall x (Militant(x) and Abandoned(x) -> Humid(x))\n\nMilitant(maryanna)\n\nMilitant(maryanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Fara is not suspected. Fara is nefarious. Fara is thyrotoxic. Fara is stabilised. Fara is not reniform. Marve is suspected. Marve is unanswered. Marve is not nefarious. Marve is degressive. Marve is not thyrotoxic. Marve is stabilised. Marve is reniform. All stabilised things are degressive. If something is degressive and not reniform then it is unanswered. If Marve is unanswered and Marve is nefarious then Marve is suspected. If something is nefarious and not unanswered then it is not thyrotoxic. All degressive, suspected things are not nefarious. If something is thyrotoxic and not degressive then it is nefarious. Marve is unanswered.", "logic": "\nnot Suspected(fara)\nNefarious(fara)\nThyrotoxic(fara)\nStabilised(fara)\nnot Reniform(fara)\nSuspected(marve)\nUnanswered(marve)\nnot Nefarious(marve)\nDegressive(marve)\nnot Thyrotoxic(marve)\nStabilised(marve)\nReniform(marve)\nforall x (Stabilised(x) -> Degressive(x))\nforall x (Degressive(x) and not Reniform(x) -> Unanswered(x))\nUnanswered(marve) and Nefarious(marve) -> Suspected(marve)\nforall x (Nefarious(x) and not Unanswered(x) -> not Thyrotoxic(x))\nforall x (Degressive(x) and Suspected(x) -> not Nefarious(x))\nforall x (Thyrotoxic(x) and not Degressive(x) -> Nefarious(x))\n\nUnanswered(marve)\n\ntherefore Unanswered(marve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-767"} {"premises": "Phip is not after. Phip is softening. Phip is projected. Phip is decayed. Phip is not mucoidal. Broddy is after. Broddy is croupy. Broddy is not softening. Broddy is amuck. Broddy is not projected. Broddy is decayed. Broddy is mucoidal. All decayed things are amuck. If something is amuck and not mucoidal then it is croupy. If Broddy is croupy and Broddy is softening then Broddy is after. If something is softening and not croupy then it is not projected. All amuck, after things are not softening. If something is projected and not amuck then it is softening. Broddy is softening.", "logic": "\nnot After(phip)\nSoftening(phip)\nProjected(phip)\nDecayed(phip)\nnot Mucoidal(phip)\nAfter(broddy)\nCroupy(broddy)\nnot Softening(broddy)\nAmuck(broddy)\nnot Projected(broddy)\nDecayed(broddy)\nMucoidal(broddy)\nforall x (Decayed(x) -> Amuck(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) and not Mucoidal(x) -> Croupy(x))\nCroupy(broddy) and Softening(broddy) -> After(broddy)\nforall x (Softening(x) and not Croupy(x) -> not Projected(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) and After(x) -> not Softening(x))\nforall x (Projected(x) and not Amuck(x) -> Softening(x))\n\nSoftening(broddy)\n\ntherefore not Softening(broddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-767"} {"premises": "Ania is not slack. Ania is unethical. Ania is unlaced. Ania is nonpareil. Ania is not owing. Morganica is slack. Morganica is chasidic. Morganica is not unethical. Morganica is grapelike. Morganica is not unlaced. Morganica is nonpareil. Morganica is owing. All nonpareil things are grapelike. If something is grapelike and not owing then it is chasidic. If Morganica is chasidic and Morganica is unethical then Morganica is slack. If something is unethical and not chasidic then it is not unlaced. All grapelike, slack things are not unethical. If something is unlaced and not grapelike then it is unethical. Ania is grapelike.", "logic": "\nnot Slack(ania)\nUnethical(ania)\nUnlaced(ania)\nNonpareil(ania)\nnot Owing(ania)\nSlack(morganica)\nChasidic(morganica)\nnot Unethical(morganica)\nGrapelike(morganica)\nnot Unlaced(morganica)\nNonpareil(morganica)\nOwing(morganica)\nforall x (Nonpareil(x) -> Grapelike(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) and not Owing(x) -> Chasidic(x))\nChasidic(morganica) and Unethical(morganica) -> Slack(morganica)\nforall x (Unethical(x) and not Chasidic(x) -> not Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) and Slack(x) -> not Unethical(x))\nforall x (Unlaced(x) and not Grapelike(x) -> Unethical(x))\n\nGrapelike(ania)\n\nNonpareil(ania) and forall x (Nonpareil(x) -> Grapelike(x)) -> therefore Grapelike(ania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-767"} {"premises": "Nadya is not stocked. Nadya is ecological. Nadya is lawless. Nadya is ashy. Nadya is not asunder. Laurianne is stocked. Laurianne is abnormal. Laurianne is not ecological. Laurianne is homemade. Laurianne is not lawless. Laurianne is ashy. Laurianne is asunder. All ashy things are homemade. If something is homemade and not asunder then it is abnormal. If Laurianne is abnormal and Laurianne is ecological then Laurianne is stocked. If something is ecological and not abnormal then it is not lawless. All homemade, stocked things are not ecological. If something is lawless and not homemade then it is ecological. Nadya is not homemade.", "logic": "\nnot Stocked(nadya)\nEcological(nadya)\nLawless(nadya)\nAshy(nadya)\nnot Asunder(nadya)\nStocked(laurianne)\nAbnormal(laurianne)\nnot Ecological(laurianne)\nHomemade(laurianne)\nnot Lawless(laurianne)\nAshy(laurianne)\nAsunder(laurianne)\nforall x (Ashy(x) -> Homemade(x))\nforall x (Homemade(x) and not Asunder(x) -> Abnormal(x))\nAbnormal(laurianne) and Ecological(laurianne) -> Stocked(laurianne)\nforall x (Ecological(x) and not Abnormal(x) -> not Lawless(x))\nforall x (Homemade(x) and Stocked(x) -> not Ecological(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) and not Homemade(x) -> Ecological(x))\n\nnot Homemade(nadya)\n\nAshy(nadya) and forall x (Ashy(x) -> Homemade(x)) -> therefore Homemade(nadya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-767"} {"premises": "Serene is not vascular. Serene is cocky. Serene is piggy. Serene is jungly. Serene is not repellant. Kizzee is vascular. Kizzee is sapphire. Kizzee is not cocky. Kizzee is resolute. Kizzee is not piggy. Kizzee is jungly. Kizzee is repellant. All jungly things are resolute. If something is resolute and not repellant then it is sapphire. If Kizzee is sapphire and Kizzee is cocky then Kizzee is vascular. If something is cocky and not sapphire then it is not piggy. All resolute, vascular things are not cocky. If something is piggy and not resolute then it is cocky. Serene is sapphire.", "logic": "\nnot Vascular(serene)\nCocky(serene)\nPiggy(serene)\nJungly(serene)\nnot Repellant(serene)\nVascular(kizzee)\nSapphire(kizzee)\nnot Cocky(kizzee)\nResolute(kizzee)\nnot Piggy(kizzee)\nJungly(kizzee)\nRepellant(kizzee)\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Resolute(x))\nforall x (Resolute(x) and not Repellant(x) -> Sapphire(x))\nSapphire(kizzee) and Cocky(kizzee) -> Vascular(kizzee)\nforall x (Cocky(x) and not Sapphire(x) -> not Piggy(x))\nforall x (Resolute(x) and Vascular(x) -> not Cocky(x))\nforall x (Piggy(x) and not Resolute(x) -> Cocky(x))\n\nSapphire(serene)\n\nJungly(serene) and forall x (Jungly(x) -> Resolute(x)) -> therefore Resolute(serene) Resolute(serene) and not Repellant(serene) and forall x (Resolute(x) and not Repellant(x) -> Sapphire(x)) -> therefore Sapphire(serene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-767"} {"premises": "Morgen is not merciless. Morgen is epileptic. Morgen is apodeictic. Morgen is retiring. Morgen is not dissoluble. Ivan is merciless. Ivan is subalpine. Ivan is not epileptic. Ivan is loath. Ivan is not apodeictic. Ivan is retiring. Ivan is dissoluble. All retiring things are loath. If something is loath and not dissoluble then it is subalpine. If Ivan is subalpine and Ivan is epileptic then Ivan is merciless. If something is epileptic and not subalpine then it is not apodeictic. All loath, merciless things are not epileptic. If something is apodeictic and not loath then it is epileptic. Morgen is not subalpine.", "logic": "\nnot Merciless(morgen)\nEpileptic(morgen)\nApodeictic(morgen)\nRetiring(morgen)\nnot Dissoluble(morgen)\nMerciless(ivan)\nSubalpine(ivan)\nnot Epileptic(ivan)\nLoath(ivan)\nnot Apodeictic(ivan)\nRetiring(ivan)\nDissoluble(ivan)\nforall x (Retiring(x) -> Loath(x))\nforall x (Loath(x) and not Dissoluble(x) -> Subalpine(x))\nSubalpine(ivan) and Epileptic(ivan) -> Merciless(ivan)\nforall x (Epileptic(x) and not Subalpine(x) -> not Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Loath(x) and Merciless(x) -> not Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) and not Loath(x) -> Epileptic(x))\n\nnot Subalpine(morgen)\n\nRetiring(morgen) and forall x (Retiring(x) -> Loath(x)) -> therefore Loath(morgen) Loath(morgen) and not Dissoluble(morgen) and forall x (Loath(x) and not Dissoluble(x) -> Subalpine(x)) -> therefore Subalpine(morgen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-767"} {"premises": "Lorinda is shapeless. Mahmoud is packaged. Mahmoud is shapeless. Round things are accepted. If something is shapeless and not aboriginal then it is packaged. All untoasted, aboriginal things are packaged. All handed, uninviting things are packaged. All packaged things are untoasted. If Mahmoud is uninviting and Mahmoud is accepted then Mahmoud is handed. Lorinda is shapeless.", "logic": "\nShapeless(lorinda)\nPackaged(mahmoud)\nShapeless(mahmoud)\nforall x (Untoasted(x) -> Accepted(x))\nforall x (Shapeless(x) and not Aboriginal(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) and Aboriginal(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Handed(x) and Uninviting(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nUninviting(mahmoud) and Accepted(mahmoud) -> Handed(mahmoud)\n\nShapeless(lorinda)\n\ntherefore Shapeless(lorinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Kristyn is satellite. Whitney is configured. Whitney is satellite. Round things are empathic. If something is satellite and not rotary then it is configured. All mozambican, rotary things are configured. All categorial, consensual things are configured. All configured things are mozambican. If Whitney is consensual and Whitney is empathic then Whitney is categorial. Kristyn is not satellite.", "logic": "\nSatellite(kristyn)\nConfigured(whitney)\nSatellite(whitney)\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> Empathic(x))\nforall x (Satellite(x) and not Rotary(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) and Rotary(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Categorial(x) and Consensual(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Configured(x) -> Mozambican(x))\nConsensual(whitney) and Empathic(whitney) -> Categorial(whitney)\n\nnot Satellite(kristyn)\n\ntherefore Satellite(kristyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Hasheem is chargeable. Vanna is wormy. Vanna is chargeable. Round things are moldy. If something is chargeable and not ocular then it is wormy. All pouchlike, ocular things are wormy. All buried, walking things are wormy. All wormy things are pouchlike. If Vanna is walking and Vanna is moldy then Vanna is buried. Vanna is pouchlike.", "logic": "\nChargeable(hasheem)\nWormy(vanna)\nChargeable(vanna)\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) -> Moldy(x))\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and not Ocular(x) -> Wormy(x))\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) and Ocular(x) -> Wormy(x))\nforall x (Buried(x) and Walking(x) -> Wormy(x))\nforall x (Wormy(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nWalking(vanna) and Moldy(vanna) -> Buried(vanna)\n\nPouchlike(vanna)\n\nWormy(vanna) and forall x (Wormy(x) -> Pouchlike(x)) -> therefore Pouchlike(vanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Jakob is demode. Harri is reversible. Harri is demode. Round things are inflatable. If something is demode and not vulpine then it is reversible. All fossorial, vulpine things are reversible. All well, lysogenic things are reversible. All reversible things are fossorial. If Harri is lysogenic and Harri is inflatable then Harri is well. Harri is not fossorial.", "logic": "\nDemode(jakob)\nReversible(harri)\nDemode(harri)\nforall x (Fossorial(x) -> Inflatable(x))\nforall x (Demode(x) and not Vulpine(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Fossorial(x) and Vulpine(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Well(x) and Lysogenic(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Reversible(x) -> Fossorial(x))\nLysogenic(harri) and Inflatable(harri) -> Well(harri)\n\nnot Fossorial(harri)\n\nReversible(harri) and forall x (Reversible(x) -> Fossorial(x)) -> therefore Fossorial(harri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Esmaria is realised. Grover is unoriginal. Grover is realised. Round things are extrinsic. If something is realised and not unexacting then it is unoriginal. All unsuited, unexacting things are unoriginal. All clinched, vapourific things are unoriginal. All unoriginal things are unsuited. If Grover is vapourific and Grover is extrinsic then Grover is clinched. Grover is extrinsic.", "logic": "\nRealised(esmaria)\nUnoriginal(grover)\nRealised(grover)\nforall x (Unsuited(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\nforall x (Realised(x) and not Unexacting(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Unexacting(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nforall x (Clinched(x) and Vapourific(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nforall x (Unoriginal(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nVapourific(grover) and Extrinsic(grover) -> Clinched(grover)\n\nExtrinsic(grover)\n\nUnoriginal(grover) and forall x (Unoriginal(x) -> Unsuited(x)) -> therefore Unsuited(grover) Unsuited(grover) and forall x (Unsuited(x) -> Extrinsic(x)) -> therefore Extrinsic(grover)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Marco is hazel. Brita is phylliform. Brita is hazel. Round things are unextended. If something is hazel and not semisolid then it is phylliform. All trendy, semisolid things are phylliform. All incitive, genetic things are phylliform. All phylliform things are trendy. If Brita is genetic and Brita is unextended then Brita is incitive. Brita is not unextended.", "logic": "\nHazel(marco)\nPhylliform(brita)\nHazel(brita)\nforall x (Trendy(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Hazel(x) and not Semisolid(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Trendy(x) and Semisolid(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Incitive(x) and Genetic(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Phylliform(x) -> Trendy(x))\nGenetic(brita) and Unextended(brita) -> Incitive(brita)\n\nnot Unextended(brita)\n\nPhylliform(brita) and forall x (Phylliform(x) -> Trendy(x)) -> therefore Trendy(brita) Trendy(brita) and forall x (Trendy(x) -> Unextended(x)) -> therefore Unextended(brita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Holly is fried. Mathilde is cairned. Mathilde is fried. Round things are mouselike. If something is fried and not dyspnoeal then it is cairned. All unifilar, dyspnoeal things are cairned. All robustious, german things are cairned. All cairned things are unifilar. If Mathilde is german and Mathilde is mouselike then Mathilde is robustious. Holly is not cairned.", "logic": "\nFried(holly)\nCairned(mathilde)\nFried(mathilde)\nforall x (Unifilar(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Fried(x) and not Dyspnoeal(x) -> Cairned(x))\nforall x (Unifilar(x) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> Cairned(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and German(x) -> Cairned(x))\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Unifilar(x))\nGerman(mathilde) and Mouselike(mathilde) -> Robustious(mathilde)\n\nnot Cairned(holly)\n\nforall x (Fried(x) and not Dyspnoeal(x) -> Cairned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Emelia is calculous. Melly is leafy. Melly is calculous. Round things are genealogic. If something is calculous and not legged then it is leafy. All practical, legged things are leafy. All local, liturgical things are leafy. All leafy things are practical. If Melly is liturgical and Melly is genealogic then Melly is local. Melly is local.", "logic": "\nCalculous(emelia)\nLeafy(melly)\nCalculous(melly)\nforall x (Practical(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) and not Legged(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Practical(x) and Legged(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Local(x) and Liturgical(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) -> Practical(x))\nLiturgical(melly) and Genealogic(melly) -> Local(melly)\n\nLocal(melly)\n\nLiturgical(melly) and Genealogic(melly) -> Local(melly) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Sheryl is murine. Vivien is pacific. Vivien is murine. Round things are volatile. If something is murine and not nonstop then it is pacific. All slavic, nonstop things are pacific. All veteran, unsought things are pacific. All pacific things are slavic. If Vivien is unsought and Vivien is volatile then Vivien is veteran. Sheryl is not volatile.", "logic": "\nMurine(sheryl)\nPacific(vivien)\nMurine(vivien)\nforall x (Slavic(x) -> Volatile(x))\nforall x (Murine(x) and not Nonstop(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Slavic(x) and Nonstop(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Unsought(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Pacific(x) -> Slavic(x))\nUnsought(vivien) and Volatile(vivien) -> Veteran(vivien)\n\nnot Volatile(sheryl)\n\nforall x (Slavic(x) -> Volatile(x)) <- forall x (Pacific(x) -> Slavic(x)) <- forall x (Murine(x) and not Nonstop(x) -> Pacific(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Luther is septuple. Cathleen is fairish. Cathleen is septuple. Round things are pronominal. If something is septuple and not colored then it is fairish. All sweetened, colored things are fairish. All unpleasant, doped things are fairish. All fairish things are sweetened. If Cathleen is doped and Cathleen is pronominal then Cathleen is unpleasant. Cathleen is colored.", "logic": "\nSeptuple(luther)\nFairish(cathleen)\nSeptuple(cathleen)\nforall x (Sweetened(x) -> Pronominal(x))\nforall x (Septuple(x) and not Colored(x) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Sweetened(x) and Colored(x) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Doped(x) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Fairish(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nDoped(cathleen) and Pronominal(cathleen) -> Unpleasant(cathleen)\n\nColored(cathleen)\n\nColored(cathleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Sutton is shelled. Wilhelm is straplike. Wilhelm is shelled. Round things are apophatic. If something is shelled and not villainous then it is straplike. All hereditary, villainous things are straplike. All moveable, congruous things are straplike. All straplike things are hereditary. If Wilhelm is congruous and Wilhelm is apophatic then Wilhelm is moveable. Sutton is not congruous.", "logic": "\nShelled(sutton)\nStraplike(wilhelm)\nShelled(wilhelm)\nforall x (Hereditary(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Shelled(x) and not Villainous(x) -> Straplike(x))\nforall x (Hereditary(x) and Villainous(x) -> Straplike(x))\nforall x (Moveable(x) and Congruous(x) -> Straplike(x))\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> Hereditary(x))\nCongruous(wilhelm) and Apophatic(wilhelm) -> Moveable(wilhelm)\n\nnot Congruous(sutton)\n\nnot Congruous(sutton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Hebert is slick. Rozina is colorfast. Rozina is slick. Round things are methodical. If something is slick and not knobby then it is colorfast. All subdued, knobby things are colorfast. All clotted, stocky things are colorfast. All colorfast things are subdued. If Rozina is stocky and Rozina is methodical then Rozina is clotted. Hebert is clotted.", "logic": "\nSlick(hebert)\nColorfast(rozina)\nSlick(rozina)\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Slick(x) and not Knobby(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) and Knobby(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Clotted(x) and Stocky(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) -> Subdued(x))\nStocky(rozina) and Methodical(rozina) -> Clotted(rozina)\n\nClotted(hebert)\n\nClotted(hebert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1773"} {"premises": "Roarke is polydactyl. Meggie is foodless. Meggie is stunning. Cold, stunning people are xiii. White, polydactyl people are foodless. Nice people are foodless. If someone is stunning then they are polydactyl. All foodless, stunning people are garbled. All polydactyl, foodless people are opening. Green people are polydactyl. All polydactyl, garbled people are foodless. Roarke is polydactyl.", "logic": "\nPolydactyl(roarke)\nFoodless(meggie)\nStunning(meggie)\nforall x (Foodless(x) and Stunning(x) -> Xiii(x))\nforall x (Garbled(x) and Polydactyl(x) -> Foodless(x))\nforall x (Xiii(x) -> Foodless(x))\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Foodless(x) and Stunning(x) -> Garbled(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Foodless(x) -> Opening(x))\nforall x (Opening(x) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Garbled(x) -> Foodless(x))\n\nPolydactyl(roarke)\n\ntherefore Polydactyl(roarke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Skye is unexampled. Marie is liked. Marie is chaotic. Cold, chaotic people are toupeed. White, unexampled people are liked. Nice people are liked. If someone is chaotic then they are unexampled. All liked, chaotic people are vigorous. All unexampled, liked people are finer. Green people are unexampled. All unexampled, vigorous people are liked. Marie is not chaotic.", "logic": "\nUnexampled(skye)\nLiked(marie)\nChaotic(marie)\nforall x (Liked(x) and Chaotic(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Vigorous(x) and Unexampled(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Chaotic(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Liked(x) and Chaotic(x) -> Vigorous(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and Liked(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and Vigorous(x) -> Liked(x))\n\nnot Chaotic(marie)\n\ntherefore Chaotic(marie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Phip is motley. Katusha is anoxic. Katusha is libelous. Cold, libelous people are billionth. White, motley people are anoxic. Nice people are anoxic. If someone is libelous then they are motley. All anoxic, libelous people are curving. All motley, anoxic people are decurved. Green people are motley. All motley, curving people are anoxic. Katusha is motley.", "logic": "\nMotley(phip)\nAnoxic(katusha)\nLibelous(katusha)\nforall x (Anoxic(x) and Libelous(x) -> Billionth(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) and Motley(x) -> Anoxic(x))\nforall x (Billionth(x) -> Anoxic(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Motley(x))\nforall x (Anoxic(x) and Libelous(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Motley(x) and Anoxic(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Decurved(x) -> Motley(x))\nforall x (Motley(x) and Curving(x) -> Anoxic(x))\n\nMotley(katusha)\n\nLibelous(katusha) and forall x (Libelous(x) -> Motley(x)) -> therefore Motley(katusha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Aurore is vascular. Doreen is coagulated. Doreen is womanlike. Cold, womanlike people are loathly. White, vascular people are coagulated. Nice people are coagulated. If someone is womanlike then they are vascular. All coagulated, womanlike people are undreamed. All vascular, coagulated people are uncurving. Green people are vascular. All vascular, undreamed people are coagulated. Doreen is not undreamed.", "logic": "\nVascular(aurore)\nCoagulated(doreen)\nWomanlike(doreen)\nforall x (Coagulated(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Loathly(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) and Vascular(x) -> Coagulated(x))\nforall x (Loathly(x) -> Coagulated(x))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Vascular(x))\nforall x (Coagulated(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Vascular(x) and Coagulated(x) -> Uncurving(x))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Vascular(x))\nforall x (Vascular(x) and Undreamed(x) -> Coagulated(x))\n\nnot Undreamed(doreen)\n\nCoagulated(doreen) and Womanlike(doreen) and forall x (Coagulated(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Undreamed(x)) -> therefore Undreamed(doreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Ivette is multilevel. Ewan is clxx. Ewan is surprised. Cold, surprised people are unthinking. White, multilevel people are clxx. Nice people are clxx. If someone is surprised then they are multilevel. All clxx, surprised people are vibrionic. All multilevel, clxx people are such. Green people are multilevel. All multilevel, vibrionic people are clxx. Ewan is such.", "logic": "\nMultilevel(ivette)\nClxx(ewan)\nSurprised(ewan)\nforall x (Clxx(x) and Surprised(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Vibrionic(x) and Multilevel(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Surprised(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) and Surprised(x) -> Vibrionic(x))\nforall x (Multilevel(x) and Clxx(x) -> Such(x))\nforall x (Such(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Multilevel(x) and Vibrionic(x) -> Clxx(x))\n\nSuch(ewan)\n\nSurprised(ewan) and forall x (Surprised(x) -> Multilevel(x)) -> therefore Multilevel(ewan) Multilevel(ewan) and Clxx(ewan) and forall x (Multilevel(x) and Clxx(x) -> Such(x)) -> therefore Such(ewan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Evaleen is slithery. Claretta is daunted. Claretta is amicable. Cold, amicable people are teachable. White, slithery people are daunted. Nice people are daunted. If someone is amicable then they are slithery. All daunted, amicable people are papist. All slithery, daunted people are repeated. Green people are slithery. All slithery, papist people are daunted. Claretta is not repeated.", "logic": "\nSlithery(evaleen)\nDaunted(claretta)\nAmicable(claretta)\nforall x (Daunted(x) and Amicable(x) -> Teachable(x))\nforall x (Papist(x) and Slithery(x) -> Daunted(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) -> Daunted(x))\nforall x (Amicable(x) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Daunted(x) and Amicable(x) -> Papist(x))\nforall x (Slithery(x) and Daunted(x) -> Repeated(x))\nforall x (Repeated(x) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Slithery(x) and Papist(x) -> Daunted(x))\n\nnot Repeated(claretta)\n\nAmicable(claretta) and forall x (Amicable(x) -> Slithery(x)) -> therefore Slithery(claretta) Slithery(claretta) and Daunted(claretta) and forall x (Slithery(x) and Daunted(x) -> Repeated(x)) -> therefore Repeated(claretta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Austen is rural. Meghan is petulant. Meghan is zolaesque. Cold, zolaesque people are clanking. White, rural people are petulant. Nice people are petulant. If someone is zolaesque then they are rural. All petulant, zolaesque people are empyrean. All rural, petulant people are biogenous. Green people are rural. All rural, empyrean people are petulant. Austen is not biogenous.", "logic": "\nRural(austen)\nPetulant(meghan)\nZolaesque(meghan)\nforall x (Petulant(x) and Zolaesque(x) -> Clanking(x))\nforall x (Empyrean(x) and Rural(x) -> Petulant(x))\nforall x (Clanking(x) -> Petulant(x))\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) and Zolaesque(x) -> Empyrean(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and Petulant(x) -> Biogenous(x))\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and Empyrean(x) -> Petulant(x))\n\nnot Biogenous(austen)\n\nforall x (Rural(x) and Petulant(x) -> Biogenous(x)) <- forall x (Empyrean(x) and Rural(x) -> Petulant(x)) <- forall x (Petulant(x) and Zolaesque(x) -> Empyrean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Rosy is following. Joaquin is venereal. Joaquin is rural. Cold, rural people are porcine. White, following people are venereal. Nice people are venereal. If someone is rural then they are following. All venereal, rural people are arachnoid. All following, venereal people are intermural. Green people are following. All following, arachnoid people are venereal. Rosy is porcine.", "logic": "\nFollowing(rosy)\nVenereal(joaquin)\nRural(joaquin)\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Rural(x) -> Porcine(x))\nforall x (Arachnoid(x) and Following(x) -> Venereal(x))\nforall x (Porcine(x) -> Venereal(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) -> Following(x))\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Rural(x) -> Arachnoid(x))\nforall x (Following(x) and Venereal(x) -> Intermural(x))\nforall x (Intermural(x) -> Following(x))\nforall x (Following(x) and Arachnoid(x) -> Venereal(x))\n\nPorcine(rosy)\n\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Rural(x) -> Porcine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Matty is oleaginous. Bertina is euphonical. Bertina is tracked. Cold, tracked people are disjoined. White, oleaginous people are euphonical. Nice people are euphonical. If someone is tracked then they are oleaginous. All euphonical, tracked people are bodacious. All oleaginous, euphonical people are egotistic. Green people are oleaginous. All oleaginous, bodacious people are euphonical. Matty is not euphonical.", "logic": "\nOleaginous(matty)\nEuphonical(bertina)\nTracked(bertina)\nforall x (Euphonical(x) and Tracked(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and Oleaginous(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Disjoined(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Tracked(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Euphonical(x) and Tracked(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and Euphonical(x) -> Egotistic(x))\nforall x (Egotistic(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and Bodacious(x) -> Euphonical(x))\n\nnot Euphonical(matty)\n\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and Oleaginous(x) -> Euphonical(x)) <- forall x (Euphonical(x) and Tracked(x) -> Bodacious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Kellsie is veinlike. Lisandra is bedimmed. Lisandra is blebbed. Cold, blebbed people are endogenic. White, veinlike people are bedimmed. Nice people are bedimmed. If someone is blebbed then they are veinlike. All bedimmed, blebbed people are volumetric. All veinlike, bedimmed people are worth. Green people are veinlike. All veinlike, volumetric people are bedimmed. Kellsie is quiet.", "logic": "\nVeinlike(kellsie)\nBedimmed(lisandra)\nBlebbed(lisandra)\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) and Blebbed(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) and Veinlike(x) -> Bedimmed(x))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) -> Bedimmed(x))\nforall x (Blebbed(x) -> Veinlike(x))\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) and Blebbed(x) -> Volumetric(x))\nforall x (Veinlike(x) and Bedimmed(x) -> Worth(x))\nforall x (Worth(x) -> Veinlike(x))\nforall x (Veinlike(x) and Volumetric(x) -> Bedimmed(x))\n\nQuiet(kellsie)\n\nQuiet(kellsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Joby is mycenaean. Lia is bipartizan. Lia is combative. Cold, combative people are rigged. White, mycenaean people are bipartizan. Nice people are bipartizan. If someone is combative then they are mycenaean. All bipartizan, combative people are grouped. All mycenaean, bipartizan people are tireless. Green people are mycenaean. All mycenaean, grouped people are bipartizan. Joby is not combative.", "logic": "\nMycenaean(joby)\nBipartizan(lia)\nCombative(lia)\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) and Combative(x) -> Rigged(x))\nforall x (Grouped(x) and Mycenaean(x) -> Bipartizan(x))\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> Bipartizan(x))\nforall x (Combative(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) and Combative(x) -> Grouped(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Bipartizan(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Tireless(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Grouped(x) -> Bipartizan(x))\n\nnot Combative(joby)\n\nnot Combative(joby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "Leanna is elongated. Malissa is chordate. Malissa is middlemost. Cold, middlemost people are upbeat. White, elongated people are chordate. Nice people are chordate. If someone is middlemost then they are elongated. All chordate, middlemost people are unfaithful. All elongated, chordate people are erect. Green people are elongated. All elongated, unfaithful people are chordate. Malissa is quiet.", "logic": "\nElongated(leanna)\nChordate(malissa)\nMiddlemost(malissa)\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Middlemost(x) -> Upbeat(x))\nforall x (Unfaithful(x) and Elongated(x) -> Chordate(x))\nforall x (Upbeat(x) -> Chordate(x))\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Elongated(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Middlemost(x) -> Unfaithful(x))\nforall x (Elongated(x) and Chordate(x) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Erect(x) -> Elongated(x))\nforall x (Elongated(x) and Unfaithful(x) -> Chordate(x))\n\nQuiet(malissa)\n\nQuiet(malissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1875"} {"premises": "The constancy is zairean. The carlota induct the romonda. The carlota induct the vinny. The carlota jell the romonda. The romonda is zairean. The vinny is dense. The vinny jell the constancy. If someone induct the romonda then the romonda attract the vinny. If someone induct the carlota then the carlota attract the constancy. If someone is alkylic and they like the romonda then they are zairean. If someone is dense and they need the carlota then the carlota induct the vinny. If someone induct the romonda then they are alkylic. If someone induct the carlota then they need the romonda. If someone is alkylic and they like the carlota then the carlota attract the romonda. If someone induct the romonda then they like the carlota. The constancy is zairean.", "logic": "\nZairean(constancy)\nInduct(carlota, romonda)\nInduct(carlota, vinny)\nJell(carlota, romonda)\nZairean(romonda)\nDense(vinny)\nJell(vinny, constancy)\nforall x (Induct(x, romonda) -> Attract(romonda, vinny))\nforall x (Induct(x, carlota) -> Attract(carlota, constancy))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) and Attract(x, romonda) -> Zairean(x))\nforall x (Dense(x) and Induct(x, carlota) -> Induct(carlota, vinny))\nforall x (Induct(x, romonda) -> Alkylic(x))\nforall x (Induct(x, carlota) -> Induct(x, romonda))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) and Attract(x, carlota) -> Attract(carlota, romonda))\nforall x (Induct(x, romonda) -> Attract(x, carlota))\n\nZairean(constancy)\n\ntherefore Zairean(constancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The masha is mensural. The joya unroll the leif. The joya unroll the dolores. The joya invent the leif. The leif is mensural. The dolores is concrete. The dolores invent the masha. If someone unroll the leif then the leif pawn the dolores. If someone unroll the joya then the joya pawn the masha. If someone is unbranded and they like the leif then they are mensural. If someone is concrete and they need the joya then the joya unroll the dolores. If someone unroll the leif then they are unbranded. If someone unroll the joya then they need the leif. If someone is unbranded and they like the joya then the joya pawn the leif. If someone unroll the leif then they like the joya. The masha is not mensural.", "logic": "\nMensural(masha)\nUnroll(joya, leif)\nUnroll(joya, dolores)\nInvent(joya, leif)\nMensural(leif)\nConcrete(dolores)\nInvent(dolores, masha)\nforall x (Unroll(x, leif) -> Pawn(leif, dolores))\nforall x (Unroll(x, joya) -> Pawn(joya, masha))\nforall x (Unbranded(x) and Pawn(x, leif) -> Mensural(x))\nforall x (Concrete(x) and Unroll(x, joya) -> Unroll(joya, dolores))\nforall x (Unroll(x, leif) -> Unbranded(x))\nforall x (Unroll(x, joya) -> Unroll(x, leif))\nforall x (Unbranded(x) and Pawn(x, joya) -> Pawn(joya, leif))\nforall x (Unroll(x, leif) -> Pawn(x, joya))\n\nnot Mensural(masha)\n\ntherefore Mensural(masha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The erny is untempting. The bertha distrain the susanetta. The bertha distrain the sharia. The bertha match the susanetta. The susanetta is untempting. The sharia is fearful. The sharia match the erny. If someone distrain the susanetta then the susanetta mildew the sharia. If someone distrain the bertha then the bertha mildew the erny. If someone is topnotch and they like the susanetta then they are untempting. If someone is fearful and they need the bertha then the bertha distrain the sharia. If someone distrain the susanetta then they are topnotch. If someone distrain the bertha then they need the susanetta. If someone is topnotch and they like the bertha then the bertha mildew the susanetta. If someone distrain the susanetta then they like the bertha. The susanetta mildew the sharia.", "logic": "\nUntempting(erny)\nDistrain(bertha, susanetta)\nDistrain(bertha, sharia)\nMatch(bertha, susanetta)\nUntempting(susanetta)\nFearful(sharia)\nMatch(sharia, erny)\nforall x (Distrain(x, susanetta) -> Mildew(susanetta, sharia))\nforall x (Distrain(x, bertha) -> Mildew(bertha, erny))\nforall x (Topnotch(x) and Mildew(x, susanetta) -> Untempting(x))\nforall x (Fearful(x) and Distrain(x, bertha) -> Distrain(bertha, sharia))\nforall x (Distrain(x, susanetta) -> Topnotch(x))\nforall x (Distrain(x, bertha) -> Distrain(x, susanetta))\nforall x (Topnotch(x) and Mildew(x, bertha) -> Mildew(bertha, susanetta))\nforall x (Distrain(x, susanetta) -> Mildew(x, bertha))\n\nMildew(susanetta, sharia)\n\nDistrain(bertha, susanetta) and forall x (Distrain(x, susanetta) -> Mildew(susanetta, sharia)) -> therefore Mildew(susanetta, sharia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The milo is numb. The durward define the vachel. The durward define the bruce. The durward aggravate the vachel. The vachel is numb. The bruce is autotelic. The bruce aggravate the milo. If someone define the vachel then the vachel quetch the bruce. If someone define the durward then the durward quetch the milo. If someone is earthbound and they like the vachel then they are numb. If someone is autotelic and they need the durward then the durward define the bruce. If someone define the vachel then they are earthbound. If someone define the durward then they need the vachel. If someone is earthbound and they like the durward then the durward quetch the vachel. If someone define the vachel then they like the durward. The durward is not earthbound.", "logic": "\nNumb(milo)\nDefine(durward, vachel)\nDefine(durward, bruce)\nAggravate(durward, vachel)\nNumb(vachel)\nAutotelic(bruce)\nAggravate(bruce, milo)\nforall x (Define(x, vachel) -> Quetch(vachel, bruce))\nforall x (Define(x, durward) -> Quetch(durward, milo))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) and Quetch(x, vachel) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Autotelic(x) and Define(x, durward) -> Define(durward, bruce))\nforall x (Define(x, vachel) -> Earthbound(x))\nforall x (Define(x, durward) -> Define(x, vachel))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) and Quetch(x, durward) -> Quetch(durward, vachel))\nforall x (Define(x, vachel) -> Quetch(x, durward))\n\nnot Earthbound(durward)\n\nDefine(durward, vachel) and forall x (Define(x, vachel) -> Earthbound(x)) -> therefore Earthbound(durward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The cherianne is stoppered. The graig chiromance the christan. The graig chiromance the trent. The graig couple the christan. The christan is stoppered. The trent is baroque. The trent couple the cherianne. If someone chiromance the christan then the christan fixate the trent. If someone chiromance the graig then the graig fixate the cherianne. If someone is ephesian and they like the christan then they are stoppered. If someone is baroque and they need the graig then the graig chiromance the trent. If someone chiromance the christan then they are ephesian. If someone chiromance the graig then they need the christan. If someone is ephesian and they like the graig then the graig fixate the christan. If someone chiromance the christan then they like the graig. The graig fixate the christan.", "logic": "\nStoppered(cherianne)\nChiromance(graig, christan)\nChiromance(graig, trent)\nCouple(graig, christan)\nStoppered(christan)\nBaroque(trent)\nCouple(trent, cherianne)\nforall x (Chiromance(x, christan) -> Fixate(christan, trent))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, graig) -> Fixate(graig, cherianne))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) and Fixate(x, christan) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) and Chiromance(x, graig) -> Chiromance(graig, trent))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, christan) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, graig) -> Chiromance(x, christan))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) and Fixate(x, graig) -> Fixate(graig, christan))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, christan) -> Fixate(x, graig))\n\nFixate(graig, christan)\n\nChiromance(graig, christan) and forall x (Chiromance(x, christan) -> Ephesian(x)) -> therefore Ephesian(graig) Chiromance(graig, christan) and forall x (Chiromance(x, christan) -> Fixate(x, graig)) -> therefore Fixate(graig, graig) Ephesian(graig) and Fixate(graig, graig) and forall x (Ephesian(x) and Fixate(x, graig) -> Fixate(graig, christan)) -> therefore Fixate(graig, christan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The arne is bladelike. The garrot corduroy the jessey. The garrot corduroy the bethanne. The garrot foredate the jessey. The jessey is bladelike. The bethanne is outcaste. The bethanne foredate the arne. If someone corduroy the jessey then the jessey tauten the bethanne. If someone corduroy the garrot then the garrot tauten the arne. If someone is aging and they like the jessey then they are bladelike. If someone is outcaste and they need the garrot then the garrot corduroy the bethanne. If someone corduroy the jessey then they are aging. If someone corduroy the garrot then they need the jessey. If someone is aging and they like the garrot then the garrot tauten the jessey. If someone corduroy the jessey then they like the garrot. The garrot does not like the jessey.", "logic": "\nBladelike(arne)\nCorduroy(garrot, jessey)\nCorduroy(garrot, bethanne)\nForedate(garrot, jessey)\nBladelike(jessey)\nOutcaste(bethanne)\nForedate(bethanne, arne)\nforall x (Corduroy(x, jessey) -> Tauten(jessey, bethanne))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, garrot) -> Tauten(garrot, arne))\nforall x (Aging(x) and Tauten(x, jessey) -> Bladelike(x))\nforall x (Outcaste(x) and Corduroy(x, garrot) -> Corduroy(garrot, bethanne))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, jessey) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, garrot) -> Corduroy(x, jessey))\nforall x (Aging(x) and Tauten(x, garrot) -> Tauten(garrot, jessey))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, jessey) -> Tauten(x, garrot))\n\nnot Tauten(garrot, jessey)\n\nCorduroy(garrot, jessey) and forall x (Corduroy(x, jessey) -> Aging(x)) -> therefore Aging(garrot) Corduroy(garrot, jessey) and forall x (Corduroy(x, jessey) -> Tauten(x, garrot)) -> therefore Tauten(garrot, garrot) Aging(garrot) and Tauten(garrot, garrot) and forall x (Aging(x) and Tauten(x, garrot) -> Tauten(garrot, jessey)) -> therefore Tauten(garrot, jessey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The normie is puerile. The garvy debauch the anjanette. The garvy debauch the brittney. The garvy circumfuse the anjanette. The anjanette is puerile. The brittney is bosky. The brittney circumfuse the normie. If someone debauch the anjanette then the anjanette bootstrap the brittney. If someone debauch the garvy then the garvy bootstrap the normie. If someone is brimfull and they like the anjanette then they are puerile. If someone is bosky and they need the garvy then the garvy debauch the brittney. If someone debauch the anjanette then they are brimfull. If someone debauch the garvy then they need the anjanette. If someone is brimfull and they like the garvy then the garvy bootstrap the anjanette. If someone debauch the anjanette then they like the garvy. The garvy does not like the normie.", "logic": "\nPuerile(normie)\nDebauch(garvy, anjanette)\nDebauch(garvy, brittney)\nCircumfuse(garvy, anjanette)\nPuerile(anjanette)\nBosky(brittney)\nCircumfuse(brittney, normie)\nforall x (Debauch(x, anjanette) -> Bootstrap(anjanette, brittney))\nforall x (Debauch(x, garvy) -> Bootstrap(garvy, normie))\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Bootstrap(x, anjanette) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Bosky(x) and Debauch(x, garvy) -> Debauch(garvy, brittney))\nforall x (Debauch(x, anjanette) -> Brimfull(x))\nforall x (Debauch(x, garvy) -> Debauch(x, anjanette))\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Bootstrap(x, garvy) -> Bootstrap(garvy, anjanette))\nforall x (Debauch(x, anjanette) -> Bootstrap(x, garvy))\n\nnot Bootstrap(garvy, normie)\n\nforall x (Debauch(x, garvy) -> Bootstrap(garvy, normie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The vanna is convinced. The lilah pilot the warden. The lilah pilot the anja. The lilah rook the warden. The warden is convinced. The anja is aphoristic. The anja rook the vanna. If someone pilot the warden then the warden vacation the anja. If someone pilot the lilah then the lilah vacation the vanna. If someone is slender and they like the warden then they are convinced. If someone is aphoristic and they need the lilah then the lilah pilot the anja. If someone pilot the warden then they are slender. If someone pilot the lilah then they need the warden. If someone is slender and they like the lilah then the lilah vacation the warden. If someone pilot the warden then they like the lilah. The vanna is slender.", "logic": "\nConvinced(vanna)\nPilot(lilah, warden)\nPilot(lilah, anja)\nRook(lilah, warden)\nConvinced(warden)\nAphoristic(anja)\nRook(anja, vanna)\nforall x (Pilot(x, warden) -> Vacation(warden, anja))\nforall x (Pilot(x, lilah) -> Vacation(lilah, vanna))\nforall x (Slender(x) and Vacation(x, warden) -> Convinced(x))\nforall x (Aphoristic(x) and Pilot(x, lilah) -> Pilot(lilah, anja))\nforall x (Pilot(x, warden) -> Slender(x))\nforall x (Pilot(x, lilah) -> Pilot(x, warden))\nforall x (Slender(x) and Vacation(x, lilah) -> Vacation(lilah, warden))\nforall x (Pilot(x, warden) -> Vacation(x, lilah))\n\nSlender(vanna)\n\nforall x (Pilot(x, warden) -> Slender(x)) <- forall x (Pilot(x, lilah) -> Pilot(x, warden)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The bride is darkening. The hector fireproof the cobb. The hector fireproof the opal. The hector parley the cobb. The cobb is darkening. The opal is pyemic. The opal parley the bride. If someone fireproof the cobb then the cobb topicalize the opal. If someone fireproof the hector then the hector topicalize the bride. If someone is flinty and they like the cobb then they are darkening. If someone is pyemic and they need the hector then the hector fireproof the opal. If someone fireproof the cobb then they are flinty. If someone fireproof the hector then they need the cobb. If someone is flinty and they like the hector then the hector topicalize the cobb. If someone fireproof the cobb then they like the hector. The cobb is not flinty.", "logic": "\nDarkening(bride)\nFireproof(hector, cobb)\nFireproof(hector, opal)\nParley(hector, cobb)\nDarkening(cobb)\nPyemic(opal)\nParley(opal, bride)\nforall x (Fireproof(x, cobb) -> Topicalize(cobb, opal))\nforall x (Fireproof(x, hector) -> Topicalize(hector, bride))\nforall x (Flinty(x) and Topicalize(x, cobb) -> Darkening(x))\nforall x (Pyemic(x) and Fireproof(x, hector) -> Fireproof(hector, opal))\nforall x (Fireproof(x, cobb) -> Flinty(x))\nforall x (Fireproof(x, hector) -> Fireproof(x, cobb))\nforall x (Flinty(x) and Topicalize(x, hector) -> Topicalize(hector, cobb))\nforall x (Fireproof(x, cobb) -> Topicalize(x, hector))\n\nnot Flinty(cobb)\n\nforall x (Fireproof(x, cobb) -> Flinty(x)) <- forall x (Fireproof(x, hector) -> Fireproof(x, cobb)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The hakim is geographic. The rudiger bogey the cornelius. The rudiger bogey the torry. The rudiger outpace the cornelius. The cornelius is geographic. The torry is emotional. The torry outpace the hakim. If someone bogey the cornelius then the cornelius shag the torry. If someone bogey the rudiger then the rudiger shag the hakim. If someone is cinerary and they like the cornelius then they are geographic. If someone is emotional and they need the rudiger then the rudiger bogey the torry. If someone bogey the cornelius then they are cinerary. If someone bogey the rudiger then they need the cornelius. If someone is cinerary and they like the rudiger then the rudiger shag the cornelius. If someone bogey the cornelius then they like the rudiger. The hakim shag the torry.", "logic": "\nGeographic(hakim)\nBogey(rudiger, cornelius)\nBogey(rudiger, torry)\nOutpace(rudiger, cornelius)\nGeographic(cornelius)\nEmotional(torry)\nOutpace(torry, hakim)\nforall x (Bogey(x, cornelius) -> Shag(cornelius, torry))\nforall x (Bogey(x, rudiger) -> Shag(rudiger, hakim))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) and Shag(x, cornelius) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Emotional(x) and Bogey(x, rudiger) -> Bogey(rudiger, torry))\nforall x (Bogey(x, cornelius) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Bogey(x, rudiger) -> Bogey(x, cornelius))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) and Shag(x, rudiger) -> Shag(rudiger, cornelius))\nforall x (Bogey(x, cornelius) -> Shag(x, rudiger))\n\nShag(hakim, torry)\n\nShag(hakim, torry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The gloriana is unlaced. The nataline dethaw the tandy. The nataline dethaw the kordula. The nataline cinematise the tandy. The tandy is unlaced. The kordula is fell. The kordula cinematise the gloriana. If someone dethaw the tandy then the tandy prop the kordula. If someone dethaw the nataline then the nataline prop the gloriana. If someone is widespread and they like the tandy then they are unlaced. If someone is fell and they need the nataline then the nataline dethaw the kordula. If someone dethaw the tandy then they are widespread. If someone dethaw the nataline then they need the tandy. If someone is widespread and they like the nataline then the nataline prop the tandy. If someone dethaw the tandy then they like the nataline. The nataline does not visit the gloriana.", "logic": "\nUnlaced(gloriana)\nDethaw(nataline, tandy)\nDethaw(nataline, kordula)\nCinematise(nataline, tandy)\nUnlaced(tandy)\nFell(kordula)\nCinematise(kordula, gloriana)\nforall x (Dethaw(x, tandy) -> Prop(tandy, kordula))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, nataline) -> Prop(nataline, gloriana))\nforall x (Widespread(x) and Prop(x, tandy) -> Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Fell(x) and Dethaw(x, nataline) -> Dethaw(nataline, kordula))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, tandy) -> Widespread(x))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, nataline) -> Dethaw(x, tandy))\nforall x (Widespread(x) and Prop(x, nataline) -> Prop(nataline, tandy))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, tandy) -> Prop(x, nataline))\n\nnot Cinematise(nataline, gloriana)\n\nnot Cinematise(nataline, gloriana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "The dryke is uppermost. The bary dynamize the sadella. The bary dynamize the darius. The bary yellow the sadella. The sadella is uppermost. The darius is filarial. The darius yellow the dryke. If someone dynamize the sadella then the sadella pall the darius. If someone dynamize the bary then the bary pall the dryke. If someone is bobtail and they like the sadella then they are uppermost. If someone is filarial and they need the bary then the bary dynamize the darius. If someone dynamize the sadella then they are bobtail. If someone dynamize the bary then they need the sadella. If someone is bobtail and they like the bary then the bary pall the sadella. If someone dynamize the sadella then they like the bary. The darius is rough.", "logic": "\nUppermost(dryke)\nDynamize(bary, sadella)\nDynamize(bary, darius)\nYellow(bary, sadella)\nUppermost(sadella)\nFilarial(darius)\nYellow(darius, dryke)\nforall x (Dynamize(x, sadella) -> Pall(sadella, darius))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, bary) -> Pall(bary, dryke))\nforall x (Bobtail(x) and Pall(x, sadella) -> Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Filarial(x) and Dynamize(x, bary) -> Dynamize(bary, darius))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, sadella) -> Bobtail(x))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, bary) -> Dynamize(x, sadella))\nforall x (Bobtail(x) and Pall(x, bary) -> Pall(bary, sadella))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, sadella) -> Pall(x, bary))\n\nRough(darius)\n\nRough(darius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-380"} {"premises": "Marissa is piscine. Marissa is unbarred. Marissa is not myriad. Lyndel is piscine. Lyndel is not extempore. Aleece is piscine. Aleece is foreboding. Aleece is believable. Aleece is staring. Aleece is extempore. Aleece is unbarred. Aleece is myriad. Reine is piscine. Reine is not staring. Reine is unbarred. Reine is myriad. If someone is believable and not myriad then they are not extempore. Big people are believable. If Reine is piscine then Reine is believable. Aleece is foreboding.", "logic": "\nPiscine(marissa)\nUnbarred(marissa)\nnot Myriad(marissa)\nPiscine(lyndel)\nnot Extempore(lyndel)\nPiscine(aleece)\nForeboding(aleece)\nBelievable(aleece)\nStaring(aleece)\nExtempore(aleece)\nUnbarred(aleece)\nMyriad(aleece)\nPiscine(reine)\nnot Staring(reine)\nUnbarred(reine)\nMyriad(reine)\nforall x (Believable(x) and not Myriad(x) -> not Extempore(x))\nforall x (Piscine(x) -> Believable(x))\nPiscine(reine) -> Believable(reine)\n\nForeboding(aleece)\n\ntherefore Foreboding(aleece)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Arvind is several. Arvind is quadratic. Arvind is not semiliquid. Rozanne is several. Rozanne is not volumed. Merrily is several. Merrily is forbidden. Merrily is estrous. Merrily is legitimate. Merrily is volumed. Merrily is quadratic. Merrily is semiliquid. Deena is several. Deena is not legitimate. Deena is quadratic. Deena is semiliquid. If someone is estrous and not semiliquid then they are not volumed. Big people are estrous. If Deena is several then Deena is estrous. Merrily is not estrous.", "logic": "\nSeveral(arvind)\nQuadratic(arvind)\nnot Semiliquid(arvind)\nSeveral(rozanne)\nnot Volumed(rozanne)\nSeveral(merrily)\nForbidden(merrily)\nEstrous(merrily)\nLegitimate(merrily)\nVolumed(merrily)\nQuadratic(merrily)\nSemiliquid(merrily)\nSeveral(deena)\nnot Legitimate(deena)\nQuadratic(deena)\nSemiliquid(deena)\nforall x (Estrous(x) and not Semiliquid(x) -> not Volumed(x))\nforall x (Several(x) -> Estrous(x))\nSeveral(deena) -> Estrous(deena)\n\nnot Estrous(merrily)\n\ntherefore Estrous(merrily)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Jonie is humiliated. Jonie is tetanic. Jonie is not lubberly. Dianne is humiliated. Dianne is not bunglesome. Garrett is humiliated. Garrett is mantled. Garrett is fiduciary. Garrett is vociferous. Garrett is bunglesome. Garrett is tetanic. Garrett is lubberly. Larina is humiliated. Larina is not vociferous. Larina is tetanic. Larina is lubberly. If someone is fiduciary and not lubberly then they are not bunglesome. Big people are fiduciary. If Larina is humiliated then Larina is fiduciary. Dianne is fiduciary.", "logic": "\nHumiliated(jonie)\nTetanic(jonie)\nnot Lubberly(jonie)\nHumiliated(dianne)\nnot Bunglesome(dianne)\nHumiliated(garrett)\nMantled(garrett)\nFiduciary(garrett)\nVociferous(garrett)\nBunglesome(garrett)\nTetanic(garrett)\nLubberly(garrett)\nHumiliated(larina)\nnot Vociferous(larina)\nTetanic(larina)\nLubberly(larina)\nforall x (Fiduciary(x) and not Lubberly(x) -> not Bunglesome(x))\nforall x (Humiliated(x) -> Fiduciary(x))\nHumiliated(larina) -> Fiduciary(larina)\n\nFiduciary(dianne)\n\nHumiliated(dianne) and forall x (Humiliated(x) -> Fiduciary(x)) -> therefore Fiduciary(dianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Valeria is neolithic. Valeria is irritated. Valeria is not irenic. Antonin is neolithic. Antonin is not wavering. Lamb is neolithic. Lamb is undomestic. Lamb is thai. Lamb is venturous. Lamb is wavering. Lamb is irritated. Lamb is irenic. Odetta is neolithic. Odetta is not venturous. Odetta is irritated. Odetta is irenic. If someone is thai and not irenic then they are not wavering. Big people are thai. If Odetta is neolithic then Odetta is thai. Odetta is not thai.", "logic": "\nNeolithic(valeria)\nIrritated(valeria)\nnot Irenic(valeria)\nNeolithic(antonin)\nnot Wavering(antonin)\nNeolithic(lamb)\nUndomestic(lamb)\nThai(lamb)\nVenturous(lamb)\nWavering(lamb)\nIrritated(lamb)\nIrenic(lamb)\nNeolithic(odetta)\nnot Venturous(odetta)\nIrritated(odetta)\nIrenic(odetta)\nforall x (Thai(x) and not Irenic(x) -> not Wavering(x))\nforall x (Neolithic(x) -> Thai(x))\nNeolithic(odetta) -> Thai(odetta)\n\nnot Thai(odetta)\n\nNeolithic(odetta) and forall x (Neolithic(x) -> Thai(x)) -> therefore Thai(odetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Claudio is bonkers. Claudio is parented. Claudio is not proud. Francisca is bonkers. Francisca is not altruistic. Tracie is bonkers. Tracie is subdued. Tracie is driving. Tracie is chopped. Tracie is altruistic. Tracie is parented. Tracie is proud. Percival is bonkers. Percival is not chopped. Percival is parented. Percival is proud. If someone is driving and not proud then they are not altruistic. Big people are driving. If Percival is bonkers then Percival is driving. Claudio is not altruistic.", "logic": "\nBonkers(claudio)\nParented(claudio)\nnot Proud(claudio)\nBonkers(francisca)\nnot Altruistic(francisca)\nBonkers(tracie)\nSubdued(tracie)\nDriving(tracie)\nChopped(tracie)\nAltruistic(tracie)\nParented(tracie)\nProud(tracie)\nBonkers(percival)\nnot Chopped(percival)\nParented(percival)\nProud(percival)\nforall x (Driving(x) and not Proud(x) -> not Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> Driving(x))\nBonkers(percival) -> Driving(percival)\n\nnot Altruistic(claudio)\n\nBonkers(claudio) and forall x (Bonkers(x) -> Driving(x)) -> therefore Driving(claudio) Driving(claudio) and not Proud(claudio) and forall x (Driving(x) and not Proud(x) -> not Altruistic(x)) -> therefore not Altruistic(claudio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Gayla is eruptive. Gayla is psychotic. Gayla is not bearish. Maris is eruptive. Maris is not censored. Chandler is eruptive. Chandler is affable. Chandler is jolting. Chandler is unfocussed. Chandler is censored. Chandler is psychotic. Chandler is bearish. Randie is eruptive. Randie is not unfocussed. Randie is psychotic. Randie is bearish. If someone is jolting and not bearish then they are not censored. Big people are jolting. If Randie is eruptive then Randie is jolting. Gayla is censored.", "logic": "\nEruptive(gayla)\nPsychotic(gayla)\nnot Bearish(gayla)\nEruptive(maris)\nnot Censored(maris)\nEruptive(chandler)\nAffable(chandler)\nJolting(chandler)\nUnfocussed(chandler)\nCensored(chandler)\nPsychotic(chandler)\nBearish(chandler)\nEruptive(randie)\nnot Unfocussed(randie)\nPsychotic(randie)\nBearish(randie)\nforall x (Jolting(x) and not Bearish(x) -> not Censored(x))\nforall x (Eruptive(x) -> Jolting(x))\nEruptive(randie) -> Jolting(randie)\n\nCensored(gayla)\n\nEruptive(gayla) and forall x (Eruptive(x) -> Jolting(x)) -> therefore Jolting(gayla) Jolting(gayla) and not Bearish(gayla) and forall x (Jolting(x) and not Bearish(x) -> not Censored(x)) -> therefore not Censored(gayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Heidie is color. Heidie is opulent. Heidie is not costumed. Katerine is color. Katerine is not wifely. Scottie is color. Scottie is sheer. Scottie is ribbony. Scottie is haploidic. Scottie is wifely. Scottie is opulent. Scottie is costumed. Sargent is color. Sargent is not haploidic. Sargent is opulent. Sargent is costumed. If someone is ribbony and not costumed then they are not wifely. Big people are ribbony. If Sargent is color then Sargent is ribbony. Heidie is not sheer.", "logic": "\nColor(heidie)\nOpulent(heidie)\nnot Costumed(heidie)\nColor(katerine)\nnot Wifely(katerine)\nColor(scottie)\nSheer(scottie)\nRibbony(scottie)\nHaploidic(scottie)\nWifely(scottie)\nOpulent(scottie)\nCostumed(scottie)\nColor(sargent)\nnot Haploidic(sargent)\nOpulent(sargent)\nCostumed(sargent)\nforall x (Ribbony(x) and not Costumed(x) -> not Wifely(x))\nforall x (Color(x) -> Ribbony(x))\nColor(sargent) -> Ribbony(sargent)\n\nnot Sheer(heidie)\n\nnot Sheer(heidie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Tanya is adventive. Tanya is fateful. Tanya is not leguminous. Gilligan is adventive. Gilligan is not testaceous. Merrili is adventive. Merrili is xxxviii. Merrili is ungusseted. Merrili is yearlong. Merrili is testaceous. Merrili is fateful. Merrili is leguminous. Pammie is adventive. Pammie is not yearlong. Pammie is fateful. Pammie is leguminous. If someone is ungusseted and not leguminous then they are not testaceous. Big people are ungusseted. If Pammie is adventive then Pammie is ungusseted. Gilligan is xxxviii.", "logic": "\nAdventive(tanya)\nFateful(tanya)\nnot Leguminous(tanya)\nAdventive(gilligan)\nnot Testaceous(gilligan)\nAdventive(merrili)\nXxxviii(merrili)\nUngusseted(merrili)\nYearlong(merrili)\nTestaceous(merrili)\nFateful(merrili)\nLeguminous(merrili)\nAdventive(pammie)\nnot Yearlong(pammie)\nFateful(pammie)\nLeguminous(pammie)\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and not Leguminous(x) -> not Testaceous(x))\nforall x (Adventive(x) -> Ungusseted(x))\nAdventive(pammie) -> Ungusseted(pammie)\n\nXxxviii(gilligan)\n\nXxxviii(gilligan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Sianna is alkahestic. Sianna is disputed. Sianna is not uncordial. Hali is alkahestic. Hali is not smitten. Mirabella is alkahestic. Mirabella is semisolid. Mirabella is barbarous. Mirabella is descendant. Mirabella is smitten. Mirabella is disputed. Mirabella is uncordial. Arabela is alkahestic. Arabela is not descendant. Arabela is disputed. Arabela is uncordial. If someone is barbarous and not uncordial then they are not smitten. Big people are barbarous. If Arabela is alkahestic then Arabela is barbarous. Arabela is not smitten.", "logic": "\nAlkahestic(sianna)\nDisputed(sianna)\nnot Uncordial(sianna)\nAlkahestic(hali)\nnot Smitten(hali)\nAlkahestic(mirabella)\nSemisolid(mirabella)\nBarbarous(mirabella)\nDescendant(mirabella)\nSmitten(mirabella)\nDisputed(mirabella)\nUncordial(mirabella)\nAlkahestic(arabela)\nnot Descendant(arabela)\nDisputed(arabela)\nUncordial(arabela)\nforall x (Barbarous(x) and not Uncordial(x) -> not Smitten(x))\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) -> Barbarous(x))\nAlkahestic(arabela) -> Barbarous(arabela)\n\nnot Smitten(arabela)\n\nnot Smitten(arabela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Jerrine is snide. Jerrine is bubaline. Jerrine is not intimate. Bessy is snide. Bessy is not vivacious. Melloney is snide. Melloney is moveable. Melloney is unextended. Melloney is placative. Melloney is vivacious. Melloney is bubaline. Melloney is intimate. Averell is snide. Averell is not placative. Averell is bubaline. Averell is intimate. If someone is unextended and not intimate then they are not vivacious. Big people are unextended. If Averell is snide then Averell is unextended. Bessy is bubaline.", "logic": "\nSnide(jerrine)\nBubaline(jerrine)\nnot Intimate(jerrine)\nSnide(bessy)\nnot Vivacious(bessy)\nSnide(melloney)\nMoveable(melloney)\nUnextended(melloney)\nPlacative(melloney)\nVivacious(melloney)\nBubaline(melloney)\nIntimate(melloney)\nSnide(averell)\nnot Placative(averell)\nBubaline(averell)\nIntimate(averell)\nforall x (Unextended(x) and not Intimate(x) -> not Vivacious(x))\nforall x (Snide(x) -> Unextended(x))\nSnide(averell) -> Unextended(averell)\n\nBubaline(bessy)\n\nBubaline(bessy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Winston is colonial. Winston is adjustive. Winston is not soughing. Kee is colonial. Kee is not coagulate. Zacharie is colonial. Zacharie is orderly. Zacharie is unmined. Zacharie is comfy. Zacharie is coagulate. Zacharie is adjustive. Zacharie is soughing. Catlin is colonial. Catlin is not comfy. Catlin is adjustive. Catlin is soughing. If someone is unmined and not soughing then they are not coagulate. Big people are unmined. If Catlin is colonial then Catlin is unmined. Catlin is not orderly.", "logic": "\nColonial(winston)\nAdjustive(winston)\nnot Soughing(winston)\nColonial(kee)\nnot Coagulate(kee)\nColonial(zacharie)\nOrderly(zacharie)\nUnmined(zacharie)\nComfy(zacharie)\nCoagulate(zacharie)\nAdjustive(zacharie)\nSoughing(zacharie)\nColonial(catlin)\nnot Comfy(catlin)\nAdjustive(catlin)\nSoughing(catlin)\nforall x (Unmined(x) and not Soughing(x) -> not Coagulate(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Unmined(x))\nColonial(catlin) -> Unmined(catlin)\n\nnot Orderly(catlin)\n\nnot Orderly(catlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Sanson is isocyclic. Sanson is capitate. Sanson is not sedgy. Vernon is isocyclic. Vernon is not compound. Hartwell is isocyclic. Hartwell is unbolted. Hartwell is chestnut. Hartwell is blanketed. Hartwell is compound. Hartwell is capitate. Hartwell is sedgy. Rayshell is isocyclic. Rayshell is not blanketed. Rayshell is capitate. Rayshell is sedgy. If someone is chestnut and not sedgy then they are not compound. Big people are chestnut. If Rayshell is isocyclic then Rayshell is chestnut. Vernon is blanketed.", "logic": "\nIsocyclic(sanson)\nCapitate(sanson)\nnot Sedgy(sanson)\nIsocyclic(vernon)\nnot Compound(vernon)\nIsocyclic(hartwell)\nUnbolted(hartwell)\nChestnut(hartwell)\nBlanketed(hartwell)\nCompound(hartwell)\nCapitate(hartwell)\nSedgy(hartwell)\nIsocyclic(rayshell)\nnot Blanketed(rayshell)\nCapitate(rayshell)\nSedgy(rayshell)\nforall x (Chestnut(x) and not Sedgy(x) -> not Compound(x))\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) -> Chestnut(x))\nIsocyclic(rayshell) -> Chestnut(rayshell)\n\nBlanketed(vernon)\n\nBlanketed(vernon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-838"} {"premises": "Oona is unlike. Oona is pawky. Oona is oceangoing. Oona is abasic. Oona is descending. Oona is numeral. Oona is anosmic. Cacilia is unlike. Cacilia is pawky. Cacilia is oceangoing. Cacilia is numeral. Cacilia is anosmic. White things are abasic. Furry, numeral things are abasic. If Cacilia is descending and Cacilia is pawky then Cacilia is oceangoing. Round, pawky things are oceangoing. Green, numeral things are unlike. If something is abasic and pawky then it is descending. Oona is unlike.", "logic": "\nUnlike(oona)\nPawky(oona)\nOceangoing(oona)\nAbasic(oona)\nDescending(oona)\nNumeral(oona)\nAnosmic(oona)\nUnlike(cacilia)\nPawky(cacilia)\nOceangoing(cacilia)\nNumeral(cacilia)\nAnosmic(cacilia)\nforall x (Anosmic(x) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Unlike(x) and Numeral(x) -> Abasic(x))\nDescending(cacilia) and Pawky(cacilia) -> Oceangoing(cacilia)\nforall x (Descending(x) and Pawky(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\nforall x (Pawky(x) and Numeral(x) -> Unlike(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) and Pawky(x) -> Descending(x))\n\nUnlike(oona)\n\ntherefore Unlike(oona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Oswald is original. Oswald is funicular. Oswald is chartered. Oswald is maoist. Oswald is puckish. Oswald is norman. Oswald is aboral. Gregorio is original. Gregorio is funicular. Gregorio is chartered. Gregorio is norman. Gregorio is aboral. White things are maoist. Furry, norman things are maoist. If Gregorio is puckish and Gregorio is funicular then Gregorio is chartered. Round, funicular things are chartered. Green, norman things are original. If something is maoist and funicular then it is puckish. Gregorio is not norman.", "logic": "\nOriginal(oswald)\nFunicular(oswald)\nChartered(oswald)\nMaoist(oswald)\nPuckish(oswald)\nNorman(oswald)\nAboral(oswald)\nOriginal(gregorio)\nFunicular(gregorio)\nChartered(gregorio)\nNorman(gregorio)\nAboral(gregorio)\nforall x (Aboral(x) -> Maoist(x))\nforall x (Original(x) and Norman(x) -> Maoist(x))\nPuckish(gregorio) and Funicular(gregorio) -> Chartered(gregorio)\nforall x (Puckish(x) and Funicular(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Funicular(x) and Norman(x) -> Original(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) and Funicular(x) -> Puckish(x))\n\nnot Norman(gregorio)\n\ntherefore Norman(gregorio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "King is bohemian. King is congested. King is embolic. King is endocrine. King is desegrated. King is lactogenic. King is spiffing. Prudy is bohemian. Prudy is congested. Prudy is embolic. Prudy is lactogenic. Prudy is spiffing. White things are endocrine. Furry, lactogenic things are endocrine. If Prudy is desegrated and Prudy is congested then Prudy is embolic. Round, congested things are embolic. Green, lactogenic things are bohemian. If something is endocrine and congested then it is desegrated. Prudy is endocrine.", "logic": "\nBohemian(king)\nCongested(king)\nEmbolic(king)\nEndocrine(king)\nDesegrated(king)\nLactogenic(king)\nSpiffing(king)\nBohemian(prudy)\nCongested(prudy)\nEmbolic(prudy)\nLactogenic(prudy)\nSpiffing(prudy)\nforall x (Spiffing(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nDesegrated(prudy) and Congested(prudy) -> Embolic(prudy)\nforall x (Desegrated(x) and Congested(x) -> Embolic(x))\nforall x (Congested(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Endocrine(x) and Congested(x) -> Desegrated(x))\n\nEndocrine(prudy)\n\nSpiffing(prudy) and forall x (Spiffing(x) -> Endocrine(x)) -> therefore Endocrine(prudy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Aileen is apiculate. Aileen is aeonian. Aileen is speckless. Aileen is squatty. Aileen is rotatable. Aileen is aglitter. Aileen is hypnotised. Corky is apiculate. Corky is aeonian. Corky is speckless. Corky is aglitter. Corky is hypnotised. White things are squatty. Furry, aglitter things are squatty. If Corky is rotatable and Corky is aeonian then Corky is speckless. Round, aeonian things are speckless. Green, aglitter things are apiculate. If something is squatty and aeonian then it is rotatable. Corky is not squatty.", "logic": "\nApiculate(aileen)\nAeonian(aileen)\nSpeckless(aileen)\nSquatty(aileen)\nRotatable(aileen)\nAglitter(aileen)\nHypnotised(aileen)\nApiculate(corky)\nAeonian(corky)\nSpeckless(corky)\nAglitter(corky)\nHypnotised(corky)\nforall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Squatty(x))\nforall x (Apiculate(x) and Aglitter(x) -> Squatty(x))\nRotatable(corky) and Aeonian(corky) -> Speckless(corky)\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and Aeonian(x) -> Speckless(x))\nforall x (Aeonian(x) and Aglitter(x) -> Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Squatty(x) and Aeonian(x) -> Rotatable(x))\n\nnot Squatty(corky)\n\nHypnotised(corky) and forall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Squatty(x)) -> therefore Squatty(corky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Violet is registered. Violet is reeking. Violet is pathologic. Violet is canary. Violet is cambrian. Violet is bigamous. Violet is musical. Bellanca is registered. Bellanca is reeking. Bellanca is pathologic. Bellanca is bigamous. Bellanca is musical. White things are canary. Furry, bigamous things are canary. If Bellanca is cambrian and Bellanca is reeking then Bellanca is pathologic. Round, reeking things are pathologic. Green, bigamous things are registered. If something is canary and reeking then it is cambrian. Bellanca is cambrian.", "logic": "\nRegistered(violet)\nReeking(violet)\nPathologic(violet)\nCanary(violet)\nCambrian(violet)\nBigamous(violet)\nMusical(violet)\nRegistered(bellanca)\nReeking(bellanca)\nPathologic(bellanca)\nBigamous(bellanca)\nMusical(bellanca)\nforall x (Musical(x) -> Canary(x))\nforall x (Registered(x) and Bigamous(x) -> Canary(x))\nCambrian(bellanca) and Reeking(bellanca) -> Pathologic(bellanca)\nforall x (Cambrian(x) and Reeking(x) -> Pathologic(x))\nforall x (Reeking(x) and Bigamous(x) -> Registered(x))\nforall x (Canary(x) and Reeking(x) -> Cambrian(x))\n\nCambrian(bellanca)\n\nMusical(bellanca) and forall x (Musical(x) -> Canary(x)) -> therefore Canary(bellanca) Canary(bellanca) and Reeking(bellanca) and forall x (Canary(x) and Reeking(x) -> Cambrian(x)) -> therefore Cambrian(bellanca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Lorie is violated. Lorie is jocular. Lorie is milled. Lorie is scoreless. Lorie is enabling. Lorie is albescent. Lorie is fawning. Cornie is violated. Cornie is jocular. Cornie is milled. Cornie is albescent. Cornie is fawning. White things are scoreless. Furry, albescent things are scoreless. If Cornie is enabling and Cornie is jocular then Cornie is milled. Round, jocular things are milled. Green, albescent things are violated. If something is scoreless and jocular then it is enabling. Cornie is not enabling.", "logic": "\nViolated(lorie)\nJocular(lorie)\nMilled(lorie)\nScoreless(lorie)\nEnabling(lorie)\nAlbescent(lorie)\nFawning(lorie)\nViolated(cornie)\nJocular(cornie)\nMilled(cornie)\nAlbescent(cornie)\nFawning(cornie)\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Scoreless(x))\nforall x (Violated(x) and Albescent(x) -> Scoreless(x))\nEnabling(cornie) and Jocular(cornie) -> Milled(cornie)\nforall x (Enabling(x) and Jocular(x) -> Milled(x))\nforall x (Jocular(x) and Albescent(x) -> Violated(x))\nforall x (Scoreless(x) and Jocular(x) -> Enabling(x))\n\nnot Enabling(cornie)\n\nFawning(cornie) and forall x (Fawning(x) -> Scoreless(x)) -> therefore Scoreless(cornie) Scoreless(cornie) and Jocular(cornie) and forall x (Scoreless(x) and Jocular(x) -> Enabling(x)) -> therefore Enabling(cornie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The marko unchurch the gabrielle. The gabrielle unchurch the marko. If something unchurch the gabrielle and it unchurch the marko then it offsaddle the marko. If something scamp the gabrielle then it offsaddle the gabrielle. If something unchurch the gabrielle then it is astomatal. If something scamp the gabrielle and the gabrielle is sanctified then the gabrielle offsaddle the marko. If the marko unchurch the gabrielle then the gabrielle offsaddle the marko. Red things are twinkly. The marko unchurch the gabrielle.", "logic": "\nUnchurch(marko, gabrielle)\nUnchurch(gabrielle, marko)\nforall x (Unchurch(x, gabrielle) and Unchurch(x, marko) -> Offsaddle(x, marko))\nforall x (Scamp(x, gabrielle) -> Offsaddle(x, gabrielle))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, gabrielle) -> Astomatal(x))\nforall x (Scamp(x, gabrielle) and Sanctified(gabrielle) -> Offsaddle(gabrielle, marko))\nUnchurch(marko, gabrielle) -> Offsaddle(gabrielle, marko)\nforall x (Astomatal(x) -> Twinkly(x))\n\nUnchurch(marko, gabrielle)\n\ntherefore Unchurch(marko, gabrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The astra uplift the waly. The waly uplift the astra. If something uplift the waly and it uplift the astra then it equate the astra. If something prorate the waly then it equate the waly. If something uplift the waly then it is geocentric. If something prorate the waly and the waly is ceylonese then the waly equate the astra. If the astra uplift the waly then the waly equate the astra. Red things are creepy. The astra does not chase the waly.", "logic": "\nUplift(astra, waly)\nUplift(waly, astra)\nforall x (Uplift(x, waly) and Uplift(x, astra) -> Equate(x, astra))\nforall x (Prorate(x, waly) -> Equate(x, waly))\nforall x (Uplift(x, waly) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Prorate(x, waly) and Ceylonese(waly) -> Equate(waly, astra))\nUplift(astra, waly) -> Equate(waly, astra)\nforall x (Geocentric(x) -> Creepy(x))\n\nnot Uplift(astra, waly)\n\ntherefore Uplift(astra, waly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The hillard thrash the caroleen. The caroleen thrash the hillard. If something thrash the caroleen and it thrash the hillard then it unstrap the hillard. If something airt the caroleen then it unstrap the caroleen. If something thrash the caroleen then it is prone. If something airt the caroleen and the caroleen is unlaureled then the caroleen unstrap the hillard. If the hillard thrash the caroleen then the caroleen unstrap the hillard. Red things are perinasal. The caroleen unstrap the hillard.", "logic": "\nThrash(hillard, caroleen)\nThrash(caroleen, hillard)\nforall x (Thrash(x, caroleen) and Thrash(x, hillard) -> Unstrap(x, hillard))\nforall x (Airt(x, caroleen) -> Unstrap(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Thrash(x, caroleen) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Airt(x, caroleen) and Unlaureled(caroleen) -> Unstrap(caroleen, hillard))\nThrash(hillard, caroleen) -> Unstrap(caroleen, hillard)\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Perinasal(x))\n\nUnstrap(caroleen, hillard)\n\nThrash(hillard, caroleen) and Thrash(hillard, caroleen) -> Unstrap(caroleen, hillard) -> therefore Unstrap(caroleen, hillard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The anatol elegise the ingunna. The ingunna elegise the anatol. If something elegise the ingunna and it elegise the anatol then it totalize the anatol. If something diversify the ingunna then it totalize the ingunna. If something elegise the ingunna then it is platonic. If something diversify the ingunna and the ingunna is warm then the ingunna totalize the anatol. If the anatol elegise the ingunna then the ingunna totalize the anatol. Red things are euphonic. The ingunna does not need the anatol.", "logic": "\nElegise(anatol, ingunna)\nElegise(ingunna, anatol)\nforall x (Elegise(x, ingunna) and Elegise(x, anatol) -> Totalize(x, anatol))\nforall x (Diversify(x, ingunna) -> Totalize(x, ingunna))\nforall x (Elegise(x, ingunna) -> Platonic(x))\nforall x (Diversify(x, ingunna) and Warm(ingunna) -> Totalize(ingunna, anatol))\nElegise(anatol, ingunna) -> Totalize(ingunna, anatol)\nforall x (Platonic(x) -> Euphonic(x))\n\nnot Totalize(ingunna, anatol)\n\nElegise(anatol, ingunna) and Elegise(anatol, ingunna) -> Totalize(ingunna, anatol) -> therefore Totalize(ingunna, anatol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The selle mistime the bellanca. The bellanca mistime the selle. If something mistime the bellanca and it mistime the selle then it strengthen the selle. If something mistreat the bellanca then it strengthen the bellanca. If something mistime the bellanca then it is cellulosid. If something mistreat the bellanca and the bellanca is hapless then the bellanca strengthen the selle. If the selle mistime the bellanca then the bellanca strengthen the selle. Red things are unemployed. The selle is unemployed.", "logic": "\nMistime(selle, bellanca)\nMistime(bellanca, selle)\nforall x (Mistime(x, bellanca) and Mistime(x, selle) -> Strengthen(x, selle))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, bellanca) -> Strengthen(x, bellanca))\nforall x (Mistime(x, bellanca) -> Cellulosid(x))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, bellanca) and Hapless(bellanca) -> Strengthen(bellanca, selle))\nMistime(selle, bellanca) -> Strengthen(bellanca, selle)\nforall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Unemployed(x))\n\nUnemployed(selle)\n\nMistime(selle, bellanca) and forall x (Mistime(x, bellanca) -> Cellulosid(x)) -> therefore Cellulosid(selle) Cellulosid(selle) and forall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Unemployed(x)) -> therefore Unemployed(selle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The ericka hover the ragnhild. The ragnhild hover the ericka. If something hover the ragnhild and it hover the ericka then it rely the ericka. If something rampage the ragnhild then it rely the ragnhild. If something hover the ragnhild then it is enzymatic. If something rampage the ragnhild and the ragnhild is piddling then the ragnhild rely the ericka. If the ericka hover the ragnhild then the ragnhild rely the ericka. Red things are adequate. The ericka is not adequate.", "logic": "\nHover(ericka, ragnhild)\nHover(ragnhild, ericka)\nforall x (Hover(x, ragnhild) and Hover(x, ericka) -> Rely(x, ericka))\nforall x (Rampage(x, ragnhild) -> Rely(x, ragnhild))\nforall x (Hover(x, ragnhild) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Rampage(x, ragnhild) and Piddling(ragnhild) -> Rely(ragnhild, ericka))\nHover(ericka, ragnhild) -> Rely(ragnhild, ericka)\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Adequate(x))\n\nnot Adequate(ericka)\n\nHover(ericka, ragnhild) and forall x (Hover(x, ragnhild) -> Enzymatic(x)) -> therefore Enzymatic(ericka) Enzymatic(ericka) and forall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Adequate(x)) -> therefore Adequate(ericka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The perrine tissue the chevalier. The chevalier tissue the perrine. If something tissue the chevalier and it tissue the perrine then it circumcise the perrine. If something reactivate the chevalier then it circumcise the chevalier. If something tissue the chevalier then it is mnemonic. If something reactivate the chevalier and the chevalier is venetian then the chevalier circumcise the perrine. If the perrine tissue the chevalier then the chevalier circumcise the perrine. Red things are requested. The chevalier does not need the chevalier.", "logic": "\nTissue(perrine, chevalier)\nTissue(chevalier, perrine)\nforall x (Tissue(x, chevalier) and Tissue(x, perrine) -> Circumcise(x, perrine))\nforall x (Reactivate(x, chevalier) -> Circumcise(x, chevalier))\nforall x (Tissue(x, chevalier) -> Mnemonic(x))\nforall x (Reactivate(x, chevalier) and Venetian(chevalier) -> Circumcise(chevalier, perrine))\nTissue(perrine, chevalier) -> Circumcise(chevalier, perrine)\nforall x (Mnemonic(x) -> Requested(x))\n\nnot Circumcise(chevalier, chevalier)\n\nforall x (Reactivate(x, chevalier) -> Circumcise(x, chevalier)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The cynthie moil the jay. The jay moil the cynthie. If something moil the jay and it moil the cynthie then it disunify the cynthie. If something swag the jay then it disunify the jay. If something moil the jay then it is bronzed. If something swag the jay and the jay is backward then the jay disunify the cynthie. If the cynthie moil the jay then the jay disunify the cynthie. Red things are neritic. The cynthie disunify the cynthie.", "logic": "\nMoil(cynthie, jay)\nMoil(jay, cynthie)\nforall x (Moil(x, jay) and Moil(x, cynthie) -> Disunify(x, cynthie))\nforall x (Swag(x, jay) -> Disunify(x, jay))\nforall x (Moil(x, jay) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Swag(x, jay) and Backward(jay) -> Disunify(jay, cynthie))\nMoil(cynthie, jay) -> Disunify(jay, cynthie)\nforall x (Bronzed(x) -> Neritic(x))\n\nDisunify(cynthie, cynthie)\n\nforall x (Moil(x, jay) and Moil(x, cynthie) -> Disunify(x, cynthie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The aleen modulate the skell. The skell modulate the aleen. If something modulate the skell and it modulate the aleen then it emplane the aleen. If something scuffle the skell then it emplane the skell. If something modulate the skell then it is xanthous. If something scuffle the skell and the skell is inheriting then the skell emplane the aleen. If the aleen modulate the skell then the skell emplane the aleen. Red things are unalarming. The skell is not unalarming.", "logic": "\nModulate(aleen, skell)\nModulate(skell, aleen)\nforall x (Modulate(x, skell) and Modulate(x, aleen) -> Emplane(x, aleen))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, skell) -> Emplane(x, skell))\nforall x (Modulate(x, skell) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, skell) and Inheriting(skell) -> Emplane(skell, aleen))\nModulate(aleen, skell) -> Emplane(skell, aleen)\nforall x (Xanthous(x) -> Unalarming(x))\n\nnot Unalarming(skell)\n\nforall x (Xanthous(x) -> Unalarming(x)) <- forall x (Modulate(x, skell) -> Xanthous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The ailina become the devon. The devon become the ailina. If something become the devon and it become the ailina then it deride the ailina. If something haze the devon then it deride the devon. If something become the devon then it is unweary. If something haze the devon and the devon is deadlocked then the devon deride the ailina. If the ailina become the devon then the devon deride the ailina. Red things are nascent. The ailina is blue.", "logic": "\nBecome(ailina, devon)\nBecome(devon, ailina)\nforall x (Become(x, devon) and Become(x, ailina) -> Deride(x, ailina))\nforall x (Haze(x, devon) -> Deride(x, devon))\nforall x (Become(x, devon) -> Unweary(x))\nforall x (Haze(x, devon) and Deadlocked(devon) -> Deride(devon, ailina))\nBecome(ailina, devon) -> Deride(devon, ailina)\nforall x (Unweary(x) -> Nascent(x))\n\nBlue(ailina)\n\nBlue(ailina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The jana fetch the verna. The verna fetch the jana. If something fetch the verna and it fetch the jana then it dissipate the jana. If something victual the verna then it dissipate the verna. If something fetch the verna then it is humanlike. If something victual the verna and the verna is illegible then the verna dissipate the jana. If the jana fetch the verna then the verna dissipate the jana. Red things are prefatory. The verna does not see the jana.", "logic": "\nFetch(jana, verna)\nFetch(verna, jana)\nforall x (Fetch(x, verna) and Fetch(x, jana) -> Dissipate(x, jana))\nforall x (Victual(x, verna) -> Dissipate(x, verna))\nforall x (Fetch(x, verna) -> Humanlike(x))\nforall x (Victual(x, verna) and Illegible(verna) -> Dissipate(verna, jana))\nFetch(jana, verna) -> Dissipate(verna, jana)\nforall x (Humanlike(x) -> Prefatory(x))\n\nnot Victual(verna, jana)\n\nnot Victual(verna, jana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The shimon stick the brittany. The brittany stick the shimon. If something stick the brittany and it stick the shimon then it trammel the shimon. If something overboil the brittany then it trammel the brittany. If something stick the brittany then it is scrofulous. If something overboil the brittany and the brittany is ideal then the brittany trammel the shimon. If the shimon stick the brittany then the brittany trammel the shimon. Red things are pinnatifid. The shimon is young.", "logic": "\nStick(shimon, brittany)\nStick(brittany, shimon)\nforall x (Stick(x, brittany) and Stick(x, shimon) -> Trammel(x, shimon))\nforall x (Overboil(x, brittany) -> Trammel(x, brittany))\nforall x (Stick(x, brittany) -> Scrofulous(x))\nforall x (Overboil(x, brittany) and Ideal(brittany) -> Trammel(brittany, shimon))\nStick(shimon, brittany) -> Trammel(brittany, shimon)\nforall x (Scrofulous(x) -> Pinnatifid(x))\n\nYoung(shimon)\n\nYoung(shimon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "Luna is truant. Kassie is mutualist. Cynthy is nipping. Zack is truant. If someone is nipping and not grungy then they are mutualist. All burnable people are warped. All nipping people are burnable. Zack is truant.", "logic": "\nTruant(luna)\nMutualist(kassie)\nNipping(cynthy)\nTruant(zack)\nforall x (Nipping(x) and not Grungy(x) -> Mutualist(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Warped(x))\nforall x (Nipping(x) -> Burnable(x))\n\nTruant(zack)\n\ntherefore Truant(zack)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Marilee is sheeny. Sascha is dialectic. Victoria is peanut. Elna is sheeny. If someone is peanut and not cowardly then they are dialectic. All concerned people are extempore. All peanut people are concerned. Elna is not sheeny.", "logic": "\nSheeny(marilee)\nDialectic(sascha)\nPeanut(victoria)\nSheeny(elna)\nforall x (Peanut(x) and not Cowardly(x) -> Dialectic(x))\nforall x (Concerned(x) -> Extempore(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Concerned(x))\n\nnot Sheeny(elna)\n\ntherefore Sheeny(elna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Thorstein is lowland. Steven is rolling. Ajai is achenial. Emilie is lowland. If someone is achenial and not monocarpic then they are rolling. All sticky people are indurate. All achenial people are sticky. Ajai is sticky.", "logic": "\nLowland(thorstein)\nRolling(steven)\nAchenial(ajai)\nLowland(emilie)\nforall x (Achenial(x) and not Monocarpic(x) -> Rolling(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Achenial(x) -> Sticky(x))\n\nSticky(ajai)\n\nAchenial(ajai) and forall x (Achenial(x) -> Sticky(x)) -> therefore Sticky(ajai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Shimon is canonist. Dawn is wigged. Vassily is purblind. Brana is canonist. If someone is purblind and not awestruck then they are wigged. All auxetic people are married. All purblind people are auxetic. Vassily is not auxetic.", "logic": "\nCanonist(shimon)\nWigged(dawn)\nPurblind(vassily)\nCanonist(brana)\nforall x (Purblind(x) and not Awestruck(x) -> Wigged(x))\nforall x (Auxetic(x) -> Married(x))\nforall x (Purblind(x) -> Auxetic(x))\n\nnot Auxetic(vassily)\n\nPurblind(vassily) and forall x (Purblind(x) -> Auxetic(x)) -> therefore Auxetic(vassily)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Lou is adept. Adeline is niffy. Mair is aspectual. Neala is adept. If someone is aspectual and not kookie then they are niffy. All ultimo people are moonstruck. All aspectual people are ultimo. Mair is moonstruck.", "logic": "\nAdept(lou)\nNiffy(adeline)\nAspectual(mair)\nAdept(neala)\nforall x (Aspectual(x) and not Kookie(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Ultimo(x) -> Moonstruck(x))\nforall x (Aspectual(x) -> Ultimo(x))\n\nMoonstruck(mair)\n\nAspectual(mair) and forall x (Aspectual(x) -> Ultimo(x)) -> therefore Ultimo(mair) Ultimo(mair) and forall x (Ultimo(x) -> Moonstruck(x)) -> therefore Moonstruck(mair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Hortensia is endogenic. Artie is caducean. Jacinda is pedigreed. Elayne is endogenic. If someone is pedigreed and not northward then they are caducean. All glorified people are blastemic. All pedigreed people are glorified. Jacinda is not blastemic.", "logic": "\nEndogenic(hortensia)\nCaducean(artie)\nPedigreed(jacinda)\nEndogenic(elayne)\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) and not Northward(x) -> Caducean(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Blastemic(x))\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Glorified(x))\n\nnot Blastemic(jacinda)\n\nPedigreed(jacinda) and forall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Glorified(x)) -> therefore Glorified(jacinda) Glorified(jacinda) and forall x (Glorified(x) -> Blastemic(x)) -> therefore Blastemic(jacinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Timothea is nitric. Ximenez is validatory. Betsey is unsold. Isobel is nitric. If someone is unsold and not tomentous then they are validatory. All overloaded people are sunless. All unsold people are overloaded. Ximenez is not overloaded.", "logic": "\nNitric(timothea)\nValidatory(ximenez)\nUnsold(betsey)\nNitric(isobel)\nforall x (Unsold(x) and not Tomentous(x) -> Validatory(x))\nforall x (Overloaded(x) -> Sunless(x))\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Overloaded(x))\n\nnot Overloaded(ximenez)\n\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Overloaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Niles is genotypic. Danny is pensive. Alisa is teary. Farah is genotypic. If someone is teary and not smudgy then they are pensive. All unreleased people are acanthoid. All teary people are unreleased. Farah is unreleased.", "logic": "\nGenotypic(niles)\nPensive(danny)\nTeary(alisa)\nGenotypic(farah)\nforall x (Teary(x) and not Smudgy(x) -> Pensive(x))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Teary(x) -> Unreleased(x))\n\nUnreleased(farah)\n\nforall x (Teary(x) -> Unreleased(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Harvey is meningeal. Diannne is afflictive. Faith is nephritic. Allah is meningeal. If someone is nephritic and not gigantic then they are afflictive. All clouded people are rabid. All nephritic people are clouded. Diannne is not rabid.", "logic": "\nMeningeal(harvey)\nAfflictive(diannne)\nNephritic(faith)\nMeningeal(allah)\nforall x (Nephritic(x) and not Gigantic(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Rabid(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) -> Clouded(x))\n\nnot Rabid(diannne)\n\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Rabid(x)) <- forall x (Nephritic(x) -> Clouded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Darlene is catamenial. Calida is enzootic. Clerissa is lymphatic. Trever is catamenial. If someone is lymphatic and not multilane then they are enzootic. All awesome people are lustreless. All lymphatic people are awesome. Darlene is multilane.", "logic": "\nCatamenial(darlene)\nEnzootic(calida)\nLymphatic(clerissa)\nCatamenial(trever)\nforall x (Lymphatic(x) and not Multilane(x) -> Enzootic(x))\nforall x (Awesome(x) -> Lustreless(x))\nforall x (Lymphatic(x) -> Awesome(x))\n\nMultilane(darlene)\n\nMultilane(darlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Nat is colonic. Phoebe is inanimate. Tuesday is slimy. Teddi is colonic. If someone is slimy and not endozoic then they are inanimate. All prohibited people are aimless. All slimy people are prohibited. Teddi is not slimy.", "logic": "\nColonic(nat)\nInanimate(phoebe)\nSlimy(tuesday)\nColonic(teddi)\nforall x (Slimy(x) and not Endozoic(x) -> Inanimate(x))\nforall x (Prohibited(x) -> Aimless(x))\nforall x (Slimy(x) -> Prohibited(x))\n\nnot Slimy(teddi)\n\nnot Slimy(teddi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Renaldo is mesophytic. Bendite is triennial. Kira is ungreased. Elbertine is mesophytic. If someone is ungreased and not moneyless then they are triennial. All newborn people are sublingual. All ungreased people are newborn. Bendite is ungreased.", "logic": "\nMesophytic(renaldo)\nTriennial(bendite)\nUngreased(kira)\nMesophytic(elbertine)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and not Moneyless(x) -> Triennial(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Sublingual(x))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> Newborn(x))\n\nUngreased(bendite)\n\nUngreased(bendite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "The gerti outsmart the cherie. The gerti outsmart the edee. The gerti is bahamian. The gerti telecast the cherie. The gerti splay the edee. The ethelred outsmart the gerti. The ethelred outsmart the edee. The ethelred splay the gerti. The ethelred splay the edee. The cherie outsmart the ethelred. The cherie is bittie. The cherie splay the ethelred. The edee outsmart the cherie. The edee is corrupting. The edee is pursued. The edee telecast the gerti. If someone outsmart the cherie then they see the ethelred. If someone is bittie then they see the cherie. If someone telecast the ethelred then the ethelred is bahamian. The ethelred outsmart the gerti.", "logic": "\nOutsmart(gerti, cherie)\nOutsmart(gerti, edee)\nBahamian(gerti)\nTelecast(gerti, cherie)\nSplay(gerti, edee)\nOutsmart(ethelred, gerti)\nOutsmart(ethelred, edee)\nSplay(ethelred, gerti)\nSplay(ethelred, edee)\nOutsmart(cherie, ethelred)\nBittie(cherie)\nSplay(cherie, ethelred)\nOutsmart(edee, cherie)\nCorrupting(edee)\nPursued(edee)\nTelecast(edee, gerti)\nforall x (Outsmart(x, cherie) -> Telecast(x, ethelred))\nforall x (Bittie(x) -> Telecast(x, cherie))\nforall x (Telecast(x, ethelred) -> Bahamian(ethelred))\n\nOutsmart(ethelred, gerti)\n\ntherefore Outsmart(ethelred, gerti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The alvina retire the aeriel. The alvina retire the ciel. The alvina is tapped. The alvina vibrate the aeriel. The alvina pulverise the ciel. The leodora retire the alvina. The leodora retire the ciel. The leodora pulverise the alvina. The leodora pulverise the ciel. The aeriel retire the leodora. The aeriel is catchpenny. The aeriel pulverise the leodora. The ciel retire the aeriel. The ciel is tinpot. The ciel is zambian. The ciel vibrate the alvina. If someone retire the aeriel then they see the leodora. If someone is catchpenny then they see the aeriel. If someone vibrate the leodora then the leodora is tapped. The ciel is not tinpot.", "logic": "\nRetire(alvina, aeriel)\nRetire(alvina, ciel)\nTapped(alvina)\nVibrate(alvina, aeriel)\nPulverise(alvina, ciel)\nRetire(leodora, alvina)\nRetire(leodora, ciel)\nPulverise(leodora, alvina)\nPulverise(leodora, ciel)\nRetire(aeriel, leodora)\nCatchpenny(aeriel)\nPulverise(aeriel, leodora)\nRetire(ciel, aeriel)\nTinpot(ciel)\nZambian(ciel)\nVibrate(ciel, alvina)\nforall x (Retire(x, aeriel) -> Vibrate(x, leodora))\nforall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Vibrate(x, aeriel))\nforall x (Vibrate(x, leodora) -> Tapped(leodora))\n\nnot Tinpot(ciel)\n\ntherefore Tinpot(ciel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The nicholle confound the davidson. The nicholle confound the esther. The nicholle is silvan. The nicholle bushwhack the davidson. The nicholle scare the esther. The bogdan confound the nicholle. The bogdan confound the esther. The bogdan scare the nicholle. The bogdan scare the esther. The davidson confound the bogdan. The davidson is lengthwise. The davidson scare the bogdan. The esther confound the davidson. The esther is ovarian. The esther is motherless. The esther bushwhack the nicholle. If someone confound the davidson then they see the bogdan. If someone is lengthwise then they see the davidson. If someone bushwhack the bogdan then the bogdan is silvan. The nicholle bushwhack the bogdan.", "logic": "\nConfound(nicholle, davidson)\nConfound(nicholle, esther)\nSilvan(nicholle)\nBushwhack(nicholle, davidson)\nScare(nicholle, esther)\nConfound(bogdan, nicholle)\nConfound(bogdan, esther)\nScare(bogdan, nicholle)\nScare(bogdan, esther)\nConfound(davidson, bogdan)\nLengthwise(davidson)\nScare(davidson, bogdan)\nConfound(esther, davidson)\nOvarian(esther)\nMotherless(esther)\nBushwhack(esther, nicholle)\nforall x (Confound(x, davidson) -> Bushwhack(x, bogdan))\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) -> Bushwhack(x, davidson))\nforall x (Bushwhack(x, bogdan) -> Silvan(bogdan))\n\nBushwhack(nicholle, bogdan)\n\nConfound(nicholle, davidson) and forall x (Confound(x, davidson) -> Bushwhack(x, bogdan)) -> therefore Bushwhack(nicholle, bogdan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The debbi recall the adlai. The debbi recall the atlante. The debbi is lubberly. The debbi transplant the adlai. The debbi purr the atlante. The gertrud recall the debbi. The gertrud recall the atlante. The gertrud purr the debbi. The gertrud purr the atlante. The adlai recall the gertrud. The adlai is potent. The adlai purr the gertrud. The atlante recall the adlai. The atlante is awestruck. The atlante is obsessive. The atlante transplant the debbi. If someone recall the adlai then they see the gertrud. If someone is potent then they see the adlai. If someone transplant the gertrud then the gertrud is lubberly. The atlante does not see the gertrud.", "logic": "\nRecall(debbi, adlai)\nRecall(debbi, atlante)\nLubberly(debbi)\nTransplant(debbi, adlai)\nPurr(debbi, atlante)\nRecall(gertrud, debbi)\nRecall(gertrud, atlante)\nPurr(gertrud, debbi)\nPurr(gertrud, atlante)\nRecall(adlai, gertrud)\nPotent(adlai)\nPurr(adlai, gertrud)\nRecall(atlante, adlai)\nAwestruck(atlante)\nObsessive(atlante)\nTransplant(atlante, debbi)\nforall x (Recall(x, adlai) -> Transplant(x, gertrud))\nforall x (Potent(x) -> Transplant(x, adlai))\nforall x (Transplant(x, gertrud) -> Lubberly(gertrud))\n\nnot Transplant(atlante, gertrud)\n\nRecall(atlante, adlai) and forall x (Recall(x, adlai) -> Transplant(x, gertrud)) -> therefore Transplant(atlante, gertrud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The odilia disinfest the aloysius. The odilia disinfest the clotilda. The odilia is octuple. The odilia hybridize the aloysius. The odilia complement the clotilda. The sandy disinfest the odilia. The sandy disinfest the clotilda. The sandy complement the odilia. The sandy complement the clotilda. The aloysius disinfest the sandy. The aloysius is fossilised. The aloysius complement the sandy. The clotilda disinfest the aloysius. The clotilda is taxonomic. The clotilda is suspicious. The clotilda hybridize the odilia. If someone disinfest the aloysius then they see the sandy. If someone is fossilised then they see the aloysius. If someone hybridize the sandy then the sandy is octuple. The sandy is octuple.", "logic": "\nDisinfest(odilia, aloysius)\nDisinfest(odilia, clotilda)\nOctuple(odilia)\nHybridize(odilia, aloysius)\nComplement(odilia, clotilda)\nDisinfest(sandy, odilia)\nDisinfest(sandy, clotilda)\nComplement(sandy, odilia)\nComplement(sandy, clotilda)\nDisinfest(aloysius, sandy)\nFossilised(aloysius)\nComplement(aloysius, sandy)\nDisinfest(clotilda, aloysius)\nTaxonomic(clotilda)\nSuspicious(clotilda)\nHybridize(clotilda, odilia)\nforall x (Disinfest(x, aloysius) -> Hybridize(x, sandy))\nforall x (Fossilised(x) -> Hybridize(x, aloysius))\nforall x (Hybridize(x, sandy) -> Octuple(sandy))\n\nOctuple(sandy)\n\nDisinfest(odilia, aloysius) and forall x (Disinfest(x, aloysius) -> Hybridize(x, sandy)) -> therefore Hybridize(odilia, sandy) Hybridize(odilia, sandy) and forall x (Hybridize(x, sandy) -> Octuple(sandy)) -> therefore Octuple(sandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The perrine coldcock the christie. The perrine coldcock the sonny. The perrine is unsanitary. The perrine sign the christie. The perrine prawn the sonny. The nico coldcock the perrine. The nico coldcock the sonny. The nico prawn the perrine. The nico prawn the sonny. The christie coldcock the nico. The christie is subclavian. The christie prawn the nico. The sonny coldcock the christie. The sonny is norse. The sonny is franciscan. The sonny sign the perrine. If someone coldcock the christie then they see the nico. If someone is subclavian then they see the christie. If someone sign the nico then the nico is unsanitary. The nico is not unsanitary.", "logic": "\nColdcock(perrine, christie)\nColdcock(perrine, sonny)\nUnsanitary(perrine)\nSign(perrine, christie)\nPrawn(perrine, sonny)\nColdcock(nico, perrine)\nColdcock(nico, sonny)\nPrawn(nico, perrine)\nPrawn(nico, sonny)\nColdcock(christie, nico)\nSubclavian(christie)\nPrawn(christie, nico)\nColdcock(sonny, christie)\nNorse(sonny)\nFranciscan(sonny)\nSign(sonny, perrine)\nforall x (Coldcock(x, christie) -> Sign(x, nico))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) -> Sign(x, christie))\nforall x (Sign(x, nico) -> Unsanitary(nico))\n\nnot Unsanitary(nico)\n\nColdcock(perrine, christie) and forall x (Coldcock(x, christie) -> Sign(x, nico)) -> therefore Sign(perrine, nico) Sign(perrine, nico) and forall x (Sign(x, nico) -> Unsanitary(nico)) -> therefore Unsanitary(nico)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The leiah beef the jermaine. The leiah beef the ware. The leiah is basilary. The leiah splutter the jermaine. The leiah conglobate the ware. The ertha beef the leiah. The ertha beef the ware. The ertha conglobate the leiah. The ertha conglobate the ware. The jermaine beef the ertha. The jermaine is thalloid. The jermaine conglobate the ertha. The ware beef the jermaine. The ware is unshakable. The ware is here. The ware splutter the leiah. If someone beef the jermaine then they see the ertha. If someone is thalloid then they see the jermaine. If someone splutter the ertha then the ertha is basilary. The ertha does not see the ertha.", "logic": "\nBeef(leiah, jermaine)\nBeef(leiah, ware)\nBasilary(leiah)\nSplutter(leiah, jermaine)\nConglobate(leiah, ware)\nBeef(ertha, leiah)\nBeef(ertha, ware)\nConglobate(ertha, leiah)\nConglobate(ertha, ware)\nBeef(jermaine, ertha)\nThalloid(jermaine)\nConglobate(jermaine, ertha)\nBeef(ware, jermaine)\nUnshakable(ware)\nHere(ware)\nSplutter(ware, leiah)\nforall x (Beef(x, jermaine) -> Splutter(x, ertha))\nforall x (Thalloid(x) -> Splutter(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Splutter(x, ertha) -> Basilary(ertha))\n\nnot Splutter(ertha, ertha)\n\nforall x (Beef(x, jermaine) -> Splutter(x, ertha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The nancey article the teena. The nancey article the giles. The nancey is estuarine. The nancey disarrange the teena. The nancey encumber the giles. The sherwynd article the nancey. The sherwynd article the giles. The sherwynd encumber the nancey. The sherwynd encumber the giles. The teena article the sherwynd. The teena is twisted. The teena encumber the sherwynd. The giles article the teena. The giles is fascinated. The giles is hygienical. The giles disarrange the nancey. If someone article the teena then they see the sherwynd. If someone is twisted then they see the teena. If someone disarrange the sherwynd then the sherwynd is estuarine. The sherwynd disarrange the teena.", "logic": "\nArticle(nancey, teena)\nArticle(nancey, giles)\nEstuarine(nancey)\nDisarrange(nancey, teena)\nEncumber(nancey, giles)\nArticle(sherwynd, nancey)\nArticle(sherwynd, giles)\nEncumber(sherwynd, nancey)\nEncumber(sherwynd, giles)\nArticle(teena, sherwynd)\nTwisted(teena)\nEncumber(teena, sherwynd)\nArticle(giles, teena)\nFascinated(giles)\nHygienical(giles)\nDisarrange(giles, nancey)\nforall x (Article(x, teena) -> Disarrange(x, sherwynd))\nforall x (Twisted(x) -> Disarrange(x, teena))\nforall x (Disarrange(x, sherwynd) -> Estuarine(sherwynd))\n\nDisarrange(sherwynd, teena)\n\nforall x (Twisted(x) -> Disarrange(x, teena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The jeb shame the dewey. The jeb shame the anton. The jeb is unequaled. The jeb upstage the dewey. The jeb twist the anton. The ioana shame the jeb. The ioana shame the anton. The ioana twist the jeb. The ioana twist the anton. The dewey shame the ioana. The dewey is mono. The dewey twist the ioana. The anton shame the dewey. The anton is taken. The anton is medusoid. The anton upstage the jeb. If someone shame the dewey then they see the ioana. If someone is mono then they see the dewey. If someone upstage the ioana then the ioana is unequaled. The dewey does not see the ioana.", "logic": "\nShame(jeb, dewey)\nShame(jeb, anton)\nUnequaled(jeb)\nUpstage(jeb, dewey)\nTwist(jeb, anton)\nShame(ioana, jeb)\nShame(ioana, anton)\nTwist(ioana, jeb)\nTwist(ioana, anton)\nShame(dewey, ioana)\nMono(dewey)\nTwist(dewey, ioana)\nShame(anton, dewey)\nTaken(anton)\nMedusoid(anton)\nUpstage(anton, jeb)\nforall x (Shame(x, dewey) -> Upstage(x, ioana))\nforall x (Mono(x) -> Upstage(x, dewey))\nforall x (Upstage(x, ioana) -> Unequaled(ioana))\n\nnot Upstage(dewey, ioana)\n\nforall x (Shame(x, dewey) -> Upstage(x, ioana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The burke verbify the rosanne. The burke verbify the penny. The burke is extradural. The burke dropforge the rosanne. The burke liken the penny. The joline verbify the burke. The joline verbify the penny. The joline liken the burke. The joline liken the penny. The rosanne verbify the joline. The rosanne is computable. The rosanne liken the joline. The penny verbify the rosanne. The penny is waggish. The penny is venomed. The penny dropforge the burke. If someone verbify the rosanne then they see the joline. If someone is computable then they see the rosanne. If someone dropforge the joline then the joline is extradural. The penny liken the penny.", "logic": "\nVerbify(burke, rosanne)\nVerbify(burke, penny)\nExtradural(burke)\nDropforge(burke, rosanne)\nLiken(burke, penny)\nVerbify(joline, burke)\nVerbify(joline, penny)\nLiken(joline, burke)\nLiken(joline, penny)\nVerbify(rosanne, joline)\nComputable(rosanne)\nLiken(rosanne, joline)\nVerbify(penny, rosanne)\nWaggish(penny)\nVenomed(penny)\nDropforge(penny, burke)\nforall x (Verbify(x, rosanne) -> Dropforge(x, joline))\nforall x (Computable(x) -> Dropforge(x, rosanne))\nforall x (Dropforge(x, joline) -> Extradural(joline))\n\nLiken(penny, penny)\n\nLiken(penny, penny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The adolf outgeneral the leif. The adolf outgeneral the miquela. The adolf is insistent. The adolf scent the leif. The adolf tack the miquela. The geoff outgeneral the adolf. The geoff outgeneral the miquela. The geoff tack the adolf. The geoff tack the miquela. The leif outgeneral the geoff. The leif is paramount. The leif tack the geoff. The miquela outgeneral the leif. The miquela is appressed. The miquela is undomestic. The miquela scent the adolf. If someone outgeneral the leif then they see the geoff. If someone is paramount then they see the leif. If someone scent the geoff then the geoff is insistent. The geoff is not appressed.", "logic": "\nOutgeneral(adolf, leif)\nOutgeneral(adolf, miquela)\nInsistent(adolf)\nScent(adolf, leif)\nTack(adolf, miquela)\nOutgeneral(geoff, adolf)\nOutgeneral(geoff, miquela)\nTack(geoff, adolf)\nTack(geoff, miquela)\nOutgeneral(leif, geoff)\nParamount(leif)\nTack(leif, geoff)\nOutgeneral(miquela, leif)\nAppressed(miquela)\nUndomestic(miquela)\nScent(miquela, adolf)\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, leif) -> Scent(x, geoff))\nforall x (Paramount(x) -> Scent(x, leif))\nforall x (Scent(x, geoff) -> Insistent(geoff))\n\nnot Appressed(geoff)\n\nnot Appressed(geoff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The shane weightlift the sumner. The shane weightlift the aleks. The shane is minus. The shane deform the sumner. The shane undercut the aleks. The cindi weightlift the shane. The cindi weightlift the aleks. The cindi undercut the shane. The cindi undercut the aleks. The sumner weightlift the cindi. The sumner is boskopoid. The sumner undercut the cindi. The aleks weightlift the sumner. The aleks is unlovable. The aleks is ovarian. The aleks deform the shane. If someone weightlift the sumner then they see the cindi. If someone is boskopoid then they see the sumner. If someone deform the cindi then the cindi is minus. The shane undercut the sumner.", "logic": "\nWeightlift(shane, sumner)\nWeightlift(shane, aleks)\nMinus(shane)\nDeform(shane, sumner)\nUndercut(shane, aleks)\nWeightlift(cindi, shane)\nWeightlift(cindi, aleks)\nUndercut(cindi, shane)\nUndercut(cindi, aleks)\nWeightlift(sumner, cindi)\nBoskopoid(sumner)\nUndercut(sumner, cindi)\nWeightlift(aleks, sumner)\nUnlovable(aleks)\nOvarian(aleks)\nDeform(aleks, shane)\nforall x (Weightlift(x, sumner) -> Deform(x, cindi))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Deform(x, sumner))\nforall x (Deform(x, cindi) -> Minus(cindi))\n\nUndercut(shane, sumner)\n\nUndercut(shane, sumner) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "Geraldine is gnomish. Gustie is residuary. Ana is knitted. Elsi is gnomish. All malefic, residuary people are cushy. If someone is residuary then they are cushy. Blue people are sadducean. If Ana is residuary and Ana is not knitted then Ana is not gnomish. All gnomish people are not malefic. If Ana is cushy then Ana is not patrician. If someone is knitted and sadducean then they are residuary. If someone is knitted and not residuary then they are patrician. Ana is knitted.", "logic": "\nGnomish(geraldine)\nResiduary(gustie)\nKnitted(ana)\nGnomish(elsi)\nforall x (Malefic(x) and Residuary(x) -> Cushy(x))\nforall x (Residuary(x) -> Cushy(x))\nforall x (Cushy(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nResiduary(ana) and not Knitted(ana) -> not Gnomish(ana)\nforall x (Gnomish(x) -> not Malefic(x))\nCushy(ana) -> not Patrician(ana)\nforall x (Knitted(x) and Sadducean(x) -> Residuary(x))\nforall x (Knitted(x) and not Residuary(x) -> Patrician(x))\n\nKnitted(ana)\n\ntherefore Knitted(ana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Dexter is shackled. Janean is miasmal. Juliet is diminished. Sanford is shackled. All valved, miasmal people are aldermanic. If someone is miasmal then they are aldermanic. Blue people are minoan. If Juliet is miasmal and Juliet is not diminished then Juliet is not shackled. All shackled people are not valved. If Juliet is aldermanic then Juliet is not awake. If someone is diminished and minoan then they are miasmal. If someone is diminished and not miasmal then they are awake. Dexter is not shackled.", "logic": "\nShackled(dexter)\nMiasmal(janean)\nDiminished(juliet)\nShackled(sanford)\nforall x (Valved(x) and Miasmal(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\nforall x (Aldermanic(x) -> Minoan(x))\nMiasmal(juliet) and not Diminished(juliet) -> not Shackled(juliet)\nforall x (Shackled(x) -> not Valved(x))\nAldermanic(juliet) -> not Awake(juliet)\nforall x (Diminished(x) and Minoan(x) -> Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Diminished(x) and not Miasmal(x) -> Awake(x))\n\nnot Shackled(dexter)\n\ntherefore Shackled(dexter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Cornie is excretory. Stormy is ovular. Joannes is prolix. Stanwood is excretory. All lingulate, ovular people are tanned. If someone is ovular then they are tanned. Blue people are gangrenous. If Joannes is ovular and Joannes is not prolix then Joannes is not excretory. All excretory people are not lingulate. If Joannes is tanned then Joannes is not retarded. If someone is prolix and gangrenous then they are ovular. If someone is prolix and not ovular then they are retarded. Stanwood is not lingulate.", "logic": "\nExcretory(cornie)\nOvular(stormy)\nProlix(joannes)\nExcretory(stanwood)\nforall x (Lingulate(x) and Ovular(x) -> Tanned(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) -> Tanned(x))\nforall x (Tanned(x) -> Gangrenous(x))\nOvular(joannes) and not Prolix(joannes) -> not Excretory(joannes)\nforall x (Excretory(x) -> not Lingulate(x))\nTanned(joannes) -> not Retarded(joannes)\nforall x (Prolix(x) and Gangrenous(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Prolix(x) and not Ovular(x) -> Retarded(x))\n\nnot Lingulate(stanwood)\n\nExcretory(stanwood) and forall x (Excretory(x) -> not Lingulate(x)) -> therefore not Lingulate(stanwood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Thedric is accustomed. Annabell is muhammadan. Jackson is sixth. Murray is accustomed. All unattended, muhammadan people are amoeban. If someone is muhammadan then they are amoeban. Blue people are deciduous. If Jackson is muhammadan and Jackson is not sixth then Jackson is not accustomed. All accustomed people are not unattended. If Jackson is amoeban then Jackson is not diastolic. If someone is sixth and deciduous then they are muhammadan. If someone is sixth and not muhammadan then they are diastolic. Annabell is not amoeban.", "logic": "\nAccustomed(thedric)\nMuhammadan(annabell)\nSixth(jackson)\nAccustomed(murray)\nforall x (Unattended(x) and Muhammadan(x) -> Amoeban(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Amoeban(x))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nMuhammadan(jackson) and not Sixth(jackson) -> not Accustomed(jackson)\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> not Unattended(x))\nAmoeban(jackson) -> not Diastolic(jackson)\nforall x (Sixth(x) and Deciduous(x) -> Muhammadan(x))\nforall x (Sixth(x) and not Muhammadan(x) -> Diastolic(x))\n\nnot Amoeban(annabell)\n\nMuhammadan(annabell) and forall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Amoeban(x)) -> therefore Amoeban(annabell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Calida is soviet. Giff is some. Ruthanne is unsexed. Philomena is soviet. All slumbrous, some people are haggard. If someone is some then they are haggard. Blue people are gnomic. If Ruthanne is some and Ruthanne is not unsexed then Ruthanne is not soviet. All soviet people are not slumbrous. If Ruthanne is haggard then Ruthanne is not aftermost. If someone is unsexed and gnomic then they are some. If someone is unsexed and not some then they are aftermost. Giff is gnomic.", "logic": "\nSoviet(calida)\nSome(giff)\nUnsexed(ruthanne)\nSoviet(philomena)\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) and Some(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Some(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Gnomic(x))\nSome(ruthanne) and not Unsexed(ruthanne) -> not Soviet(ruthanne)\nforall x (Soviet(x) -> not Slumbrous(x))\nHaggard(ruthanne) -> not Aftermost(ruthanne)\nforall x (Unsexed(x) and Gnomic(x) -> Some(x))\nforall x (Unsexed(x) and not Some(x) -> Aftermost(x))\n\nGnomic(giff)\n\nSome(giff) and forall x (Some(x) -> Haggard(x)) -> therefore Haggard(giff) Haggard(giff) and forall x (Haggard(x) -> Gnomic(x)) -> therefore Gnomic(giff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Klaus is mean. Flemming is endowed. Evie is occlusive. Cleopatra is mean. All veracious, endowed people are revolved. If someone is endowed then they are revolved. Blue people are beholden. If Evie is endowed and Evie is not occlusive then Evie is not mean. All mean people are not veracious. If Evie is revolved then Evie is not otherwise. If someone is occlusive and beholden then they are endowed. If someone is occlusive and not endowed then they are otherwise. Flemming is not beholden.", "logic": "\nMean(klaus)\nEndowed(flemming)\nOcclusive(evie)\nMean(cleopatra)\nforall x (Veracious(x) and Endowed(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Revolved(x) -> Beholden(x))\nEndowed(evie) and not Occlusive(evie) -> not Mean(evie)\nforall x (Mean(x) -> not Veracious(x))\nRevolved(evie) -> not Otherwise(evie)\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Beholden(x) -> Endowed(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Otherwise(x))\n\nnot Beholden(flemming)\n\nEndowed(flemming) and forall x (Endowed(x) -> Revolved(x)) -> therefore Revolved(flemming) Revolved(flemming) and forall x (Revolved(x) -> Beholden(x)) -> therefore Beholden(flemming)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Avie is endowed. Fionna is croatian. Luis is gluteal. Jenda is endowed. All fancied, croatian people are fictional. If someone is croatian then they are fictional. Blue people are obviating. If Luis is croatian and Luis is not gluteal then Luis is not endowed. All endowed people are not fancied. If Luis is fictional then Luis is not animating. If someone is gluteal and obviating then they are croatian. If someone is gluteal and not croatian then they are animating. Jenda is not animating.", "logic": "\nEndowed(avie)\nCroatian(fionna)\nGluteal(luis)\nEndowed(jenda)\nforall x (Fancied(x) and Croatian(x) -> Fictional(x))\nforall x (Croatian(x) -> Fictional(x))\nforall x (Fictional(x) -> Obviating(x))\nCroatian(luis) and not Gluteal(luis) -> not Endowed(luis)\nforall x (Endowed(x) -> not Fancied(x))\nFictional(luis) -> not Animating(luis)\nforall x (Gluteal(x) and Obviating(x) -> Croatian(x))\nforall x (Gluteal(x) and not Croatian(x) -> Animating(x))\n\nnot Animating(jenda)\n\nforall x (Gluteal(x) and not Croatian(x) -> Animating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Bernadine is diplomatic. Jaleh is smiling. Cherida is olfactory. Silvester is diplomatic. All seedy, smiling people are duncish. If someone is smiling then they are duncish. Blue people are colour. If Cherida is smiling and Cherida is not olfactory then Cherida is not diplomatic. All diplomatic people are not seedy. If Cherida is duncish then Cherida is not pulmonary. If someone is olfactory and colour then they are smiling. If someone is olfactory and not smiling then they are pulmonary. Bernadine is pulmonary.", "logic": "\nDiplomatic(bernadine)\nSmiling(jaleh)\nOlfactory(cherida)\nDiplomatic(silvester)\nforall x (Seedy(x) and Smiling(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Smiling(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> Colour(x))\nSmiling(cherida) and not Olfactory(cherida) -> not Diplomatic(cherida)\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) -> not Seedy(x))\nDuncish(cherida) -> not Pulmonary(cherida)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and Colour(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and not Smiling(x) -> Pulmonary(x))\n\nPulmonary(bernadine)\n\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and not Smiling(x) -> Pulmonary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Anetta is phlegmatic. Geoff is pietistic. Clarice is scrimpy. Otes is phlegmatic. All cheeky, pietistic people are excited. If someone is pietistic then they are excited. Blue people are ossicular. If Clarice is pietistic and Clarice is not scrimpy then Clarice is not phlegmatic. All phlegmatic people are not cheeky. If Clarice is excited then Clarice is not graspable. If someone is scrimpy and ossicular then they are pietistic. If someone is scrimpy and not pietistic then they are graspable. Anetta is not excited.", "logic": "\nPhlegmatic(anetta)\nPietistic(geoff)\nScrimpy(clarice)\nPhlegmatic(otes)\nforall x (Cheeky(x) and Pietistic(x) -> Excited(x))\nforall x (Pietistic(x) -> Excited(x))\nforall x (Excited(x) -> Ossicular(x))\nPietistic(clarice) and not Scrimpy(clarice) -> not Phlegmatic(clarice)\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) -> not Cheeky(x))\nExcited(clarice) -> not Graspable(clarice)\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) and Ossicular(x) -> Pietistic(x))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) and not Pietistic(x) -> Graspable(x))\n\nnot Excited(anetta)\n\nforall x (Pietistic(x) -> Excited(x)) <- forall x (Scrimpy(x) and Ossicular(x) -> Pietistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Morgen is spondaic. Lazlo is existent. Lemar is askew. Meggy is spondaic. All mobbish, existent people are topknotted. If someone is existent then they are topknotted. Blue people are beltlike. If Lemar is existent and Lemar is not askew then Lemar is not spondaic. All spondaic people are not mobbish. If Lemar is topknotted then Lemar is not taken. If someone is askew and beltlike then they are existent. If someone is askew and not existent then they are taken. Lazlo is mobbish.", "logic": "\nSpondaic(morgen)\nExistent(lazlo)\nAskew(lemar)\nSpondaic(meggy)\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and Existent(x) -> Topknotted(x))\nforall x (Existent(x) -> Topknotted(x))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Beltlike(x))\nExistent(lemar) and not Askew(lemar) -> not Spondaic(lemar)\nforall x (Spondaic(x) -> not Mobbish(x))\nTopknotted(lemar) -> not Taken(lemar)\nforall x (Askew(x) and Beltlike(x) -> Existent(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) and not Existent(x) -> Taken(x))\n\nMobbish(lazlo)\n\nMobbish(lazlo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Junia is satirical. Clinton is appetising. Bernhard is unearned. Elise is satirical. All sumerian, appetising people are blistering. If someone is appetising then they are blistering. Blue people are entrenched. If Bernhard is appetising and Bernhard is not unearned then Bernhard is not satirical. All satirical people are not sumerian. If Bernhard is blistering then Bernhard is not undomestic. If someone is unearned and entrenched then they are appetising. If someone is unearned and not appetising then they are undomestic. Clinton is not satirical.", "logic": "\nSatirical(junia)\nAppetising(clinton)\nUnearned(bernhard)\nSatirical(elise)\nforall x (Sumerian(x) and Appetising(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Blistering(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nAppetising(bernhard) and not Unearned(bernhard) -> not Satirical(bernhard)\nforall x (Satirical(x) -> not Sumerian(x))\nBlistering(bernhard) -> not Undomestic(bernhard)\nforall x (Unearned(x) and Entrenched(x) -> Appetising(x))\nforall x (Unearned(x) and not Appetising(x) -> Undomestic(x))\n\nnot Satirical(clinton)\n\nnot Satirical(clinton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Melantha is precarious. Judah is masterless. Hayward is antepartum. Pauli is precarious. All prandial, masterless people are sweet. If someone is masterless then they are sweet. Blue people are elementary. If Hayward is masterless and Hayward is not antepartum then Hayward is not precarious. All precarious people are not prandial. If Hayward is sweet then Hayward is not capsulate. If someone is antepartum and elementary then they are masterless. If someone is antepartum and not masterless then they are capsulate. Hayward is prandial.", "logic": "\nPrecarious(melantha)\nMasterless(judah)\nAntepartum(hayward)\nPrecarious(pauli)\nforall x (Prandial(x) and Masterless(x) -> Sweet(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) -> Sweet(x))\nforall x (Sweet(x) -> Elementary(x))\nMasterless(hayward) and not Antepartum(hayward) -> not Precarious(hayward)\nforall x (Precarious(x) -> not Prandial(x))\nSweet(hayward) -> not Capsulate(hayward)\nforall x (Antepartum(x) and Elementary(x) -> Masterless(x))\nforall x (Antepartum(x) and not Masterless(x) -> Capsulate(x))\n\nPrandial(hayward)\n\nPrandial(hayward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "The winny dicker the genna. The genna perfume the winny. If someone is uncrowded then they do not see the winny. If someone dicker the genna then the genna is wonky. All wonky people are victorious. The genna perfume the winny.", "logic": "\nDicker(winny, genna)\nPerfume(genna, winny)\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> not Dicker(x, winny))\nforall x (Dicker(x, genna) -> Wonky(genna))\nforall x (Wonky(x) -> Victorious(x))\n\nPerfume(genna, winny)\n\ntherefore Perfume(genna, winny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The neely publicise the fredia. The fredia hector the neely. If someone is bottommost then they do not see the neely. If someone publicise the fredia then the fredia is outspread. All outspread people are shaping. The fredia does not chase the neely.", "logic": "\nPublicise(neely, fredia)\nHector(fredia, neely)\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> not Publicise(x, neely))\nforall x (Publicise(x, fredia) -> Outspread(fredia))\nforall x (Outspread(x) -> Shaping(x))\n\nnot Hector(fredia, neely)\n\ntherefore Hector(fredia, neely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The higgins sublease the nannie. The nannie snub the higgins. If someone is unverified then they do not see the higgins. If someone sublease the nannie then the nannie is wrathful. All wrathful people are absorbable. The nannie is wrathful.", "logic": "\nSublease(higgins, nannie)\nSnub(nannie, higgins)\nforall x (Unverified(x) -> not Sublease(x, higgins))\nforall x (Sublease(x, nannie) -> Wrathful(nannie))\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> Absorbable(x))\n\nWrathful(nannie)\n\nSublease(higgins, nannie) and forall x (Sublease(x, nannie) -> Wrathful(nannie)) -> therefore Wrathful(nannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The shilpa comfit the faunie. The faunie roughcast the shilpa. If someone is lucid then they do not see the shilpa. If someone comfit the faunie then the faunie is briny. All briny people are footsure. The faunie is not briny.", "logic": "\nComfit(shilpa, faunie)\nRoughcast(faunie, shilpa)\nforall x (Lucid(x) -> not Comfit(x, shilpa))\nforall x (Comfit(x, faunie) -> Briny(faunie))\nforall x (Briny(x) -> Footsure(x))\n\nnot Briny(faunie)\n\nComfit(shilpa, faunie) and forall x (Comfit(x, faunie) -> Briny(faunie)) -> therefore Briny(faunie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The sinclare recognise the yolanda. The yolanda explore the sinclare. If someone is botryoid then they do not see the sinclare. If someone recognise the yolanda then the yolanda is flush. All flush people are scalloped. The yolanda is scalloped.", "logic": "\nRecognise(sinclare, yolanda)\nExplore(yolanda, sinclare)\nforall x (Botryoid(x) -> not Recognise(x, sinclare))\nforall x (Recognise(x, yolanda) -> Flush(yolanda))\nforall x (Flush(x) -> Scalloped(x))\n\nScalloped(yolanda)\n\nRecognise(sinclare, yolanda) and forall x (Recognise(x, yolanda) -> Flush(yolanda)) -> therefore Flush(yolanda) Flush(yolanda) and forall x (Flush(x) -> Scalloped(x)) -> therefore Scalloped(yolanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The sondra percolate the boyce. The boyce upload the sondra. If someone is centigrade then they do not see the sondra. If someone percolate the boyce then the boyce is unfirm. All unfirm people are freakish. The boyce is not freakish.", "logic": "\nPercolate(sondra, boyce)\nUpload(boyce, sondra)\nforall x (Centigrade(x) -> not Percolate(x, sondra))\nforall x (Percolate(x, boyce) -> Unfirm(boyce))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Freakish(x))\n\nnot Freakish(boyce)\n\nPercolate(sondra, boyce) and forall x (Percolate(x, boyce) -> Unfirm(boyce)) -> therefore Unfirm(boyce) Unfirm(boyce) and forall x (Unfirm(x) -> Freakish(x)) -> therefore Freakish(boyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The poppy overstress the may. The may embargo the poppy. If someone is antecedent then they do not see the poppy. If someone overstress the may then the may is bicorn. All bicorn people are strangled. The poppy is not strangled.", "logic": "\nOverstress(poppy, may)\nEmbargo(may, poppy)\nforall x (Antecedent(x) -> not Overstress(x, poppy))\nforall x (Overstress(x, may) -> Bicorn(may))\nforall x (Bicorn(x) -> Strangled(x))\n\nnot Strangled(poppy)\n\nforall x (Bicorn(x) -> Strangled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The elisabet snuggle the daniella. The daniella seine the elisabet. If someone is underfed then they do not see the elisabet. If someone snuggle the daniella then the daniella is bitter. All bitter people are peripteral. The daniella is big.", "logic": "\nSnuggle(elisabet, daniella)\nSeine(daniella, elisabet)\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> not Snuggle(x, elisabet))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, daniella) -> Bitter(daniella))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Peripteral(x))\n\nBig(daniella)\n\nBig(daniella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The dorice outflank the parker. The parker squash the dorice. If someone is uncousinly then they do not see the dorice. If someone outflank the parker then the parker is raised. All raised people are sidereal. The dorice does not chase the dorice.", "logic": "\nOutflank(dorice, parker)\nSquash(parker, dorice)\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) -> not Outflank(x, dorice))\nforall x (Outflank(x, parker) -> Raised(parker))\nforall x (Raised(x) -> Sidereal(x))\n\nnot Squash(dorice, dorice)\n\nnot Squash(dorice, dorice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The brady terrorize the ethyl. The ethyl cheer the brady. If someone is asymptotic then they do not see the brady. If someone terrorize the ethyl then the ethyl is unseeded. All unseeded people are blimpish. The brady needs the brady.", "logic": "\nTerrorize(brady, ethyl)\nCheer(ethyl, brady)\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) -> not Terrorize(x, brady))\nforall x (Terrorize(x, ethyl) -> Unseeded(ethyl))\nforall x (Unseeded(x) -> Blimpish(x))\n\nNeeds(brady, brady)\n\nNeeds(brady, brady) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The vito intercede the marj. The marj refreshen the vito. If someone is useful then they do not see the vito. If someone intercede the marj then the marj is riled. All riled people are undaunted. The vito is not useful.", "logic": "\nIntercede(vito, marj)\nRefreshen(marj, vito)\nforall x (Useful(x) -> not Intercede(x, vito))\nforall x (Intercede(x, marj) -> Riled(marj))\nforall x (Riled(x) -> Undaunted(x))\n\nnot Useful(vito)\n\nnot Useful(vito) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The juli reminisce the nady. The nady microcopy the juli. If someone is concessive then they do not see the juli. If someone reminisce the nady then the nady is phonic. All phonic people are dexterous. The juli microcopy the nady.", "logic": "\nReminisce(juli, nady)\nMicrocopy(nady, juli)\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> not Reminisce(x, juli))\nforall x (Reminisce(x, nady) -> Phonic(nady))\nforall x (Phonic(x) -> Dexterous(x))\n\nMicrocopy(juli, nady)\n\nMicrocopy(juli, nady) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-501"} {"premises": "The ansley is rancid. The ansley is dizzy. The ansley hike the elinor. The ansley colligate the elinor. The ansley discourage the elinor. The ansley discourage the andri. The elinor is patchy. The elinor is portrayed. The elinor hike the ansley. The elinor hike the andri. The elinor colligate the andri. The elinor discourage the ansley. The andri is rancid. The andri hike the ansley. The andri colligate the ansley. The andri discourage the ansley. If something colligate the ansley then it is dizzy. If something is rancid and dizzy then it colligate the andri. The elinor is patchy.", "logic": "\nRancid(ansley)\nDizzy(ansley)\nHike(ansley, elinor)\nColligate(ansley, elinor)\nDiscourage(ansley, elinor)\nDiscourage(ansley, andri)\nPatchy(elinor)\nPortrayed(elinor)\nHike(elinor, ansley)\nHike(elinor, andri)\nColligate(elinor, andri)\nDiscourage(elinor, ansley)\nRancid(andri)\nHike(andri, ansley)\nColligate(andri, ansley)\nDiscourage(andri, ansley)\nforall x (Colligate(x, ansley) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Rancid(x) and Dizzy(x) -> Colligate(x, andri))\n\nPatchy(elinor)\n\ntherefore Patchy(elinor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The annmarie is jingoistic. The annmarie is cyan. The annmarie urinate the agnese. The annmarie braid the agnese. The annmarie extinguish the agnese. The annmarie extinguish the valenka. The agnese is refractory. The agnese is opaque. The agnese urinate the annmarie. The agnese urinate the valenka. The agnese braid the valenka. The agnese extinguish the annmarie. The valenka is jingoistic. The valenka urinate the annmarie. The valenka braid the annmarie. The valenka extinguish the annmarie. If something braid the annmarie then it is cyan. If something is jingoistic and cyan then it braid the valenka. The agnese is not opaque.", "logic": "\nJingoistic(annmarie)\nCyan(annmarie)\nUrinate(annmarie, agnese)\nBraid(annmarie, agnese)\nExtinguish(annmarie, agnese)\nExtinguish(annmarie, valenka)\nRefractory(agnese)\nOpaque(agnese)\nUrinate(agnese, annmarie)\nUrinate(agnese, valenka)\nBraid(agnese, valenka)\nExtinguish(agnese, annmarie)\nJingoistic(valenka)\nUrinate(valenka, annmarie)\nBraid(valenka, annmarie)\nExtinguish(valenka, annmarie)\nforall x (Braid(x, annmarie) -> Cyan(x))\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) and Cyan(x) -> Braid(x, valenka))\n\nnot Opaque(agnese)\n\ntherefore Opaque(agnese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The gloria is immovable. The gloria is prefrontal. The gloria procreate the maddie. The gloria withdraw the maddie. The gloria coldcock the maddie. The gloria coldcock the idaline. The maddie is gigantic. The maddie is gobsmacked. The maddie procreate the gloria. The maddie procreate the idaline. The maddie withdraw the idaline. The maddie coldcock the gloria. The idaline is immovable. The idaline procreate the gloria. The idaline withdraw the gloria. The idaline coldcock the gloria. If something withdraw the gloria then it is prefrontal. If something is immovable and prefrontal then it withdraw the idaline. The idaline is prefrontal.", "logic": "\nImmovable(gloria)\nPrefrontal(gloria)\nProcreate(gloria, maddie)\nWithdraw(gloria, maddie)\nColdcock(gloria, maddie)\nColdcock(gloria, idaline)\nGigantic(maddie)\nGobsmacked(maddie)\nProcreate(maddie, gloria)\nProcreate(maddie, idaline)\nWithdraw(maddie, idaline)\nColdcock(maddie, gloria)\nImmovable(idaline)\nProcreate(idaline, gloria)\nWithdraw(idaline, gloria)\nColdcock(idaline, gloria)\nforall x (Withdraw(x, gloria) -> Prefrontal(x))\nforall x (Immovable(x) and Prefrontal(x) -> Withdraw(x, idaline))\n\nPrefrontal(idaline)\n\nWithdraw(idaline, gloria) and forall x (Withdraw(x, gloria) -> Prefrontal(x)) -> therefore Prefrontal(idaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The charissa is unreactive. The charissa is fiberoptic. The charissa coiffure the tessa. The charissa irrigate the tessa. The charissa lead the tessa. The charissa lead the millie. The tessa is knotted. The tessa is squishy. The tessa coiffure the charissa. The tessa coiffure the millie. The tessa irrigate the millie. The tessa lead the charissa. The millie is unreactive. The millie coiffure the charissa. The millie irrigate the charissa. The millie lead the charissa. If something irrigate the charissa then it is fiberoptic. If something is unreactive and fiberoptic then it irrigate the millie. The millie is not fiberoptic.", "logic": "\nUnreactive(charissa)\nFiberoptic(charissa)\nCoiffure(charissa, tessa)\nIrrigate(charissa, tessa)\nLead(charissa, tessa)\nLead(charissa, millie)\nKnotted(tessa)\nSquishy(tessa)\nCoiffure(tessa, charissa)\nCoiffure(tessa, millie)\nIrrigate(tessa, millie)\nLead(tessa, charissa)\nUnreactive(millie)\nCoiffure(millie, charissa)\nIrrigate(millie, charissa)\nLead(millie, charissa)\nforall x (Irrigate(x, charissa) -> Fiberoptic(x))\nforall x (Unreactive(x) and Fiberoptic(x) -> Irrigate(x, millie))\n\nnot Fiberoptic(millie)\n\nIrrigate(millie, charissa) and forall x (Irrigate(x, charissa) -> Fiberoptic(x)) -> therefore Fiberoptic(millie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The ruby is unsilenced. The ruby is clubable. The ruby counsel the ursula. The ruby weight the ursula. The ruby probe the ursula. The ruby probe the knox. The ursula is repand. The ursula is virucidal. The ursula counsel the ruby. The ursula counsel the knox. The ursula weight the knox. The ursula probe the ruby. The knox is unsilenced. The knox counsel the ruby. The knox weight the ruby. The knox probe the ruby. If something weight the ruby then it is clubable. If something is unsilenced and clubable then it weight the knox. The knox weight the knox.", "logic": "\nUnsilenced(ruby)\nClubable(ruby)\nCounsel(ruby, ursula)\nWeight(ruby, ursula)\nProbe(ruby, ursula)\nProbe(ruby, knox)\nRepand(ursula)\nVirucidal(ursula)\nCounsel(ursula, ruby)\nCounsel(ursula, knox)\nWeight(ursula, knox)\nProbe(ursula, ruby)\nUnsilenced(knox)\nCounsel(knox, ruby)\nWeight(knox, ruby)\nProbe(knox, ruby)\nforall x (Weight(x, ruby) -> Clubable(x))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) and Clubable(x) -> Weight(x, knox))\n\nWeight(knox, knox)\n\nWeight(knox, ruby) and forall x (Weight(x, ruby) -> Clubable(x)) -> therefore Clubable(knox) Unsilenced(knox) and Clubable(knox) and forall x (Unsilenced(x) and Clubable(x) -> Weight(x, knox)) -> therefore Weight(knox, knox)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The nonie is maintained. The nonie is monovalent. The nonie demob the rodolfo. The nonie defat the rodolfo. The nonie cronk the rodolfo. The nonie cronk the stevana. The rodolfo is overnight. The rodolfo is disjoined. The rodolfo demob the nonie. The rodolfo demob the stevana. The rodolfo defat the stevana. The rodolfo cronk the nonie. The stevana is maintained. The stevana demob the nonie. The stevana defat the nonie. The stevana cronk the nonie. If something defat the nonie then it is monovalent. If something is maintained and monovalent then it defat the stevana. The stevana does not need the stevana.", "logic": "\nMaintained(nonie)\nMonovalent(nonie)\nDemob(nonie, rodolfo)\nDefat(nonie, rodolfo)\nCronk(nonie, rodolfo)\nCronk(nonie, stevana)\nOvernight(rodolfo)\nDisjoined(rodolfo)\nDemob(rodolfo, nonie)\nDemob(rodolfo, stevana)\nDefat(rodolfo, stevana)\nCronk(rodolfo, nonie)\nMaintained(stevana)\nDemob(stevana, nonie)\nDefat(stevana, nonie)\nCronk(stevana, nonie)\nforall x (Defat(x, nonie) -> Monovalent(x))\nforall x (Maintained(x) and Monovalent(x) -> Defat(x, stevana))\n\nnot Defat(stevana, stevana)\n\nDefat(stevana, nonie) and forall x (Defat(x, nonie) -> Monovalent(x)) -> therefore Monovalent(stevana) Maintained(stevana) and Monovalent(stevana) and forall x (Maintained(x) and Monovalent(x) -> Defat(x, stevana)) -> therefore Defat(stevana, stevana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The rubina is potbellied. The rubina is israeli. The rubina pout the corliss. The rubina stage the corliss. The rubina backpedal the corliss. The rubina backpedal the siward. The corliss is volute. The corliss is dismaying. The corliss pout the rubina. The corliss pout the siward. The corliss stage the siward. The corliss backpedal the rubina. The siward is potbellied. The siward pout the rubina. The siward stage the rubina. The siward backpedal the rubina. If something stage the rubina then it is israeli. If something is potbellied and israeli then it stage the siward. The corliss is not israeli.", "logic": "\nPotbellied(rubina)\nIsraeli(rubina)\nPout(rubina, corliss)\nStage(rubina, corliss)\nBackpedal(rubina, corliss)\nBackpedal(rubina, siward)\nVolute(corliss)\nDismaying(corliss)\nPout(corliss, rubina)\nPout(corliss, siward)\nStage(corliss, siward)\nBackpedal(corliss, rubina)\nPotbellied(siward)\nPout(siward, rubina)\nStage(siward, rubina)\nBackpedal(siward, rubina)\nforall x (Stage(x, rubina) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Potbellied(x) and Israeli(x) -> Stage(x, siward))\n\nnot Israeli(corliss)\n\nforall x (Stage(x, rubina) -> Israeli(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The barty is warring. The barty is runny. The barty author the randie. The barty keratinise the randie. The barty contradict the randie. The barty contradict the tiphani. The randie is astylar. The randie is katabolic. The randie author the barty. The randie author the tiphani. The randie keratinise the tiphani. The randie contradict the barty. The tiphani is warring. The tiphani author the barty. The tiphani keratinise the barty. The tiphani contradict the barty. If something keratinise the barty then it is runny. If something is warring and runny then it keratinise the tiphani. The tiphani is astylar.", "logic": "\nWarring(barty)\nRunny(barty)\nAuthor(barty, randie)\nKeratinise(barty, randie)\nContradict(barty, randie)\nContradict(barty, tiphani)\nAstylar(randie)\nKatabolic(randie)\nAuthor(randie, barty)\nAuthor(randie, tiphani)\nKeratinise(randie, tiphani)\nContradict(randie, barty)\nWarring(tiphani)\nAuthor(tiphani, barty)\nKeratinise(tiphani, barty)\nContradict(tiphani, barty)\nforall x (Keratinise(x, barty) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Warring(x) and Runny(x) -> Keratinise(x, tiphani))\n\nAstylar(tiphani)\n\nAstylar(tiphani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The tanny is adopted. The tanny is bistroic. The tanny conduce the nora. The tanny letter the nora. The tanny aviate the nora. The tanny aviate the danie. The nora is cutting. The nora is unfettered. The nora conduce the tanny. The nora conduce the danie. The nora letter the danie. The nora aviate the tanny. The danie is adopted. The danie conduce the tanny. The danie letter the tanny. The danie aviate the tanny. If something letter the tanny then it is bistroic. If something is adopted and bistroic then it letter the danie. The nora is not red.", "logic": "\nAdopted(tanny)\nBistroic(tanny)\nConduce(tanny, nora)\nLetter(tanny, nora)\nAviate(tanny, nora)\nAviate(tanny, danie)\nCutting(nora)\nUnfettered(nora)\nConduce(nora, tanny)\nConduce(nora, danie)\nLetter(nora, danie)\nAviate(nora, tanny)\nAdopted(danie)\nConduce(danie, tanny)\nLetter(danie, tanny)\nAviate(danie, tanny)\nforall x (Letter(x, tanny) -> Bistroic(x))\nforall x (Adopted(x) and Bistroic(x) -> Letter(x, danie))\n\nnot Red(nora)\n\nnot Red(nora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The faustine is removed. The faustine is mazed. The faustine concord the conney. The faustine bulldog the conney. The faustine capsulise the conney. The faustine capsulise the dorotea. The conney is anomalous. The conney is brusk. The conney concord the faustine. The conney concord the dorotea. The conney bulldog the dorotea. The conney capsulise the faustine. The dorotea is removed. The dorotea concord the faustine. The dorotea bulldog the faustine. The dorotea capsulise the faustine. If something bulldog the faustine then it is mazed. If something is removed and mazed then it bulldog the dorotea. The dorotea concord the conney.", "logic": "\nRemoved(faustine)\nMazed(faustine)\nConcord(faustine, conney)\nBulldog(faustine, conney)\nCapsulise(faustine, conney)\nCapsulise(faustine, dorotea)\nAnomalous(conney)\nBrusk(conney)\nConcord(conney, faustine)\nConcord(conney, dorotea)\nBulldog(conney, dorotea)\nCapsulise(conney, faustine)\nRemoved(dorotea)\nConcord(dorotea, faustine)\nBulldog(dorotea, faustine)\nCapsulise(dorotea, faustine)\nforall x (Bulldog(x, faustine) -> Mazed(x))\nforall x (Removed(x) and Mazed(x) -> Bulldog(x, dorotea))\n\nConcord(dorotea, conney)\n\nConcord(dorotea, conney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The clemmy is uncurving. The clemmy is estrogenic. The clemmy drone the thekla. The clemmy naturalise the thekla. The clemmy clutter the thekla. The clemmy clutter the corinne. The thekla is decompound. The thekla is blithesome. The thekla drone the clemmy. The thekla drone the corinne. The thekla naturalise the corinne. The thekla clutter the clemmy. The corinne is uncurving. The corinne drone the clemmy. The corinne naturalise the clemmy. The corinne clutter the clemmy. If something naturalise the clemmy then it is estrogenic. If something is uncurving and estrogenic then it naturalise the corinne. The corinne does not see the thekla.", "logic": "\nUncurving(clemmy)\nEstrogenic(clemmy)\nDrone(clemmy, thekla)\nNaturalise(clemmy, thekla)\nClutter(clemmy, thekla)\nClutter(clemmy, corinne)\nDecompound(thekla)\nBlithesome(thekla)\nDrone(thekla, clemmy)\nDrone(thekla, corinne)\nNaturalise(thekla, corinne)\nClutter(thekla, clemmy)\nUncurving(corinne)\nDrone(corinne, clemmy)\nNaturalise(corinne, clemmy)\nClutter(corinne, clemmy)\nforall x (Naturalise(x, clemmy) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) and Estrogenic(x) -> Naturalise(x, corinne))\n\nnot Clutter(corinne, thekla)\n\nnot Clutter(corinne, thekla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "The vina is ginger. The vina is azido. The vina transgress the derron. The vina graze the derron. The vina decolorize the derron. The vina decolorize the minnie. The derron is hypoactive. The derron is pawky. The derron transgress the vina. The derron transgress the minnie. The derron graze the minnie. The derron decolorize the vina. The minnie is ginger. The minnie transgress the vina. The minnie graze the vina. The minnie decolorize the vina. If something graze the vina then it is azido. If something is ginger and azido then it graze the minnie. The vina transgress the minnie.", "logic": "\nGinger(vina)\nAzido(vina)\nTransgress(vina, derron)\nGraze(vina, derron)\nDecolorize(vina, derron)\nDecolorize(vina, minnie)\nHypoactive(derron)\nPawky(derron)\nTransgress(derron, vina)\nTransgress(derron, minnie)\nGraze(derron, minnie)\nDecolorize(derron, vina)\nGinger(minnie)\nTransgress(minnie, vina)\nGraze(minnie, vina)\nDecolorize(minnie, vina)\nforall x (Graze(x, vina) -> Azido(x))\nforall x (Ginger(x) and Azido(x) -> Graze(x, minnie))\n\nTransgress(vina, minnie)\n\nTransgress(vina, minnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1345"} {"premises": "Johan is cisalpine. Sandy is cisalpine. Sandy is heavenly. If someone is heavenly then they are not refractive. If someone is vigilant and not vivid then they are not tenfold. Smart, refractive people are tenfold. Smart people are shadowy. If someone is cisalpine then they are heavenly. If Sandy is cisalpine and Sandy is vigilant then Sandy is shadowy. Johan is cisalpine.", "logic": "\nCisalpine(johan)\nCisalpine(sandy)\nHeavenly(sandy)\nforall x (Heavenly(x) -> not Refractive(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) and not Vivid(x) -> not Tenfold(x))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) and Refractive(x) -> Tenfold(x))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) -> Shadowy(x))\nforall x (Cisalpine(x) -> Heavenly(x))\nCisalpine(sandy) and Vigilant(sandy) -> Shadowy(sandy)\n\nCisalpine(johan)\n\ntherefore Cisalpine(johan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Moira is louche. Hanford is louche. Hanford is amatory. If someone is amatory then they are not detected. If someone is unprovable and not cheliceral then they are not dioecious. Smart, detected people are dioecious. Smart people are antigenic. If someone is louche then they are amatory. If Hanford is louche and Hanford is unprovable then Hanford is antigenic. Moira is not louche.", "logic": "\nLouche(moira)\nLouche(hanford)\nAmatory(hanford)\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> not Detected(x))\nforall x (Unprovable(x) and not Cheliceral(x) -> not Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) and Detected(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Louche(x) -> Amatory(x))\nLouche(hanford) and Unprovable(hanford) -> Antigenic(hanford)\n\nnot Louche(moira)\n\ntherefore Louche(moira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Albert is crackers. Vic is crackers. Vic is unaffixed. If someone is unaffixed then they are not lengthened. If someone is bored and not unplanned then they are not coexisting. Smart, lengthened people are coexisting. Smart people are farther. If someone is crackers then they are unaffixed. If Vic is crackers and Vic is bored then Vic is farther. Albert is unaffixed.", "logic": "\nCrackers(albert)\nCrackers(vic)\nUnaffixed(vic)\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) -> not Lengthened(x))\nforall x (Bored(x) and not Unplanned(x) -> not Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) and Lengthened(x) -> Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) -> Farther(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\nCrackers(vic) and Bored(vic) -> Farther(vic)\n\nUnaffixed(albert)\n\nCrackers(albert) and forall x (Crackers(x) -> Unaffixed(x)) -> therefore Unaffixed(albert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Willyt is aperiodic. Neel is aperiodic. Neel is naturistic. If someone is naturistic then they are not awheel. If someone is satyrical and not astylar then they are not dreamless. Smart, awheel people are dreamless. Smart people are composite. If someone is aperiodic then they are naturistic. If Neel is aperiodic and Neel is satyrical then Neel is composite. Neel is awheel.", "logic": "\nAperiodic(willyt)\nAperiodic(neel)\nNaturistic(neel)\nforall x (Naturistic(x) -> not Awheel(x))\nforall x (Satyrical(x) and not Astylar(x) -> not Dreamless(x))\nforall x (Naturistic(x) and Awheel(x) -> Dreamless(x))\nforall x (Naturistic(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Aperiodic(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nAperiodic(neel) and Satyrical(neel) -> Composite(neel)\n\nAwheel(neel)\n\nNaturistic(neel) and forall x (Naturistic(x) -> not Awheel(x)) -> therefore not Awheel(neel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Nissy is pokey. Minni is pokey. Minni is starchy. If someone is starchy then they are not shouted. If someone is omani and not dumbstruck then they are not caffeinic. Smart, shouted people are caffeinic. Smart people are sombre. If someone is pokey then they are starchy. If Minni is pokey and Minni is omani then Minni is sombre. Nissy is sombre.", "logic": "\nPokey(nissy)\nPokey(minni)\nStarchy(minni)\nforall x (Starchy(x) -> not Shouted(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) and not Dumbstruck(x) -> not Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Starchy(x) and Shouted(x) -> Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Starchy(x) -> Sombre(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) -> Starchy(x))\nPokey(minni) and Omani(minni) -> Sombre(minni)\n\nSombre(nissy)\n\nPokey(nissy) and forall x (Pokey(x) -> Starchy(x)) -> therefore Starchy(nissy) Starchy(nissy) and forall x (Starchy(x) -> Sombre(x)) -> therefore Sombre(nissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Cynthy is slimy. Renault is slimy. Renault is encouraged. If someone is encouraged then they are not unfastened. If someone is unused and not intrastate then they are not asterismal. Smart, unfastened people are asterismal. Smart people are semiotic. If someone is slimy then they are encouraged. If Renault is slimy and Renault is unused then Renault is semiotic. Cynthy is unfastened.", "logic": "\nSlimy(cynthy)\nSlimy(renault)\nEncouraged(renault)\nforall x (Encouraged(x) -> not Unfastened(x))\nforall x (Unused(x) and not Intrastate(x) -> not Asterismal(x))\nforall x (Encouraged(x) and Unfastened(x) -> Asterismal(x))\nforall x (Encouraged(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nforall x (Slimy(x) -> Encouraged(x))\nSlimy(renault) and Unused(renault) -> Semiotic(renault)\n\nUnfastened(cynthy)\n\nSlimy(cynthy) and forall x (Slimy(x) -> Encouraged(x)) -> therefore Encouraged(cynthy) Encouraged(cynthy) and forall x (Encouraged(x) -> not Unfastened(x)) -> therefore not Unfastened(cynthy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Alena is ventricous. Nicol is ventricous. Nicol is thrilling. If someone is thrilling then they are not virtual. If someone is voracious and not arawakan then they are not indoor. Smart, virtual people are indoor. Smart people are cruel. If someone is ventricous then they are thrilling. If Nicol is ventricous and Nicol is voracious then Nicol is cruel. Nicol is not indoor.", "logic": "\nVentricous(alena)\nVentricous(nicol)\nThrilling(nicol)\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> not Virtual(x))\nforall x (Voracious(x) and not Arawakan(x) -> not Indoor(x))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) and Virtual(x) -> Indoor(x))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Cruel(x))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nVentricous(nicol) and Voracious(nicol) -> Cruel(nicol)\n\nnot Indoor(nicol)\n\nforall x (Thrilling(x) and Virtual(x) -> Indoor(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Larissa is clitoric. Roberto is clitoric. Roberto is happy. If someone is happy then they are not overmodest. If someone is puzzling and not allegro then they are not misplaced. Smart, overmodest people are misplaced. Smart people are defensive. If someone is clitoric then they are happy. If Roberto is clitoric and Roberto is puzzling then Roberto is defensive. Larissa is misplaced.", "logic": "\nClitoric(larissa)\nClitoric(roberto)\nHappy(roberto)\nforall x (Happy(x) -> not Overmodest(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) and not Allegro(x) -> not Misplaced(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) and Overmodest(x) -> Misplaced(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) -> Defensive(x))\nforall x (Clitoric(x) -> Happy(x))\nClitoric(roberto) and Puzzling(roberto) -> Defensive(roberto)\n\nMisplaced(larissa)\n\nforall x (Happy(x) and Overmodest(x) -> Misplaced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Alecia is tinkling. Genevra is tinkling. Genevra is niggardly. If someone is niggardly then they are not rodlike. If someone is mesmerized and not unguarded then they are not anhydrous. Smart, rodlike people are anhydrous. Smart people are ateleiotic. If someone is tinkling then they are niggardly. If Genevra is tinkling and Genevra is mesmerized then Genevra is ateleiotic. Genevra is not unguarded.", "logic": "\nTinkling(alecia)\nTinkling(genevra)\nNiggardly(genevra)\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> not Rodlike(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and not Unguarded(x) -> not Anhydrous(x))\nforall x (Niggardly(x) and Rodlike(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Ateleiotic(x))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Niggardly(x))\nTinkling(genevra) and Mesmerized(genevra) -> Ateleiotic(genevra)\n\nnot Unguarded(genevra)\n\nnot Unguarded(genevra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Roz is javan. Randy is javan. Randy is algerian. If someone is algerian then they are not irreverent. If someone is interior and not supple then they are not asteroidal. Smart, irreverent people are asteroidal. Smart people are boughed. If someone is javan then they are algerian. If Randy is javan and Randy is interior then Randy is boughed. Roz is interior.", "logic": "\nJavan(roz)\nJavan(randy)\nAlgerian(randy)\nforall x (Algerian(x) -> not Irreverent(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and not Supple(x) -> not Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Algerian(x) and Irreverent(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Algerian(x) -> Boughed(x))\nforall x (Javan(x) -> Algerian(x))\nJavan(randy) and Interior(randy) -> Boughed(randy)\n\nInterior(roz)\n\nInterior(roz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Joyann is wingless. Kathy is wingless. Kathy is lutheran. If someone is lutheran then they are not unequaled. If someone is handsewn and not duplicable then they are not willowy. Smart, unequaled people are willowy. Smart people are lustful. If someone is wingless then they are lutheran. If Kathy is wingless and Kathy is handsewn then Kathy is lustful. Joyann is not duplicable.", "logic": "\nWingless(joyann)\nWingless(kathy)\nLutheran(kathy)\nforall x (Lutheran(x) -> not Unequaled(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) and not Duplicable(x) -> not Willowy(x))\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and Unequaled(x) -> Willowy(x))\nforall x (Lutheran(x) -> Lustful(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Lutheran(x))\nWingless(kathy) and Handsewn(kathy) -> Lustful(kathy)\n\nnot Duplicable(joyann)\n\nnot Duplicable(joyann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "Jonah is cuddlesome. Kamillah is cuddlesome. Kamillah is noticeable. If someone is noticeable then they are not radiating. If someone is freaky and not epistemic then they are not porticoed. Smart, radiating people are porticoed. Smart people are packaged. If someone is cuddlesome then they are noticeable. If Kamillah is cuddlesome and Kamillah is freaky then Kamillah is packaged. Kamillah is freaky.", "logic": "\nCuddlesome(jonah)\nCuddlesome(kamillah)\nNoticeable(kamillah)\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> not Radiating(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) and not Epistemic(x) -> not Porticoed(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) and Radiating(x) -> Porticoed(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Noticeable(x))\nCuddlesome(kamillah) and Freaky(kamillah) -> Packaged(kamillah)\n\nFreaky(kamillah)\n\nFreaky(kamillah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1884"} {"premises": "The cayla overwork the gwenette. The cayla is worth. The cayla is openhanded. The cayla is ruled. The cayla is rotatory. The cayla is malefic. The cayla leave the gwenette. The cayla outshout the gwenette. The gwenette overwork the cayla. The gwenette is worth. The gwenette is not ruled. The gwenette is rotatory. The gwenette is not malefic. The gwenette leave the cayla. The gwenette outshout the cayla. If something overwork the gwenette and it outshout the cayla then the gwenette is openhanded. If something overwork the gwenette and it leave the gwenette then it outshout the cayla. The gwenette is worth.", "logic": "\nOverwork(cayla, gwenette)\nWorth(cayla)\nOpenhanded(cayla)\nRuled(cayla)\nRotatory(cayla)\nMalefic(cayla)\nLeave(cayla, gwenette)\nOutshout(cayla, gwenette)\nOverwork(gwenette, cayla)\nWorth(gwenette)\nnot Ruled(gwenette)\nRotatory(gwenette)\nnot Malefic(gwenette)\nLeave(gwenette, cayla)\nOutshout(gwenette, cayla)\nforall x (Overwork(x, gwenette) and Outshout(x, cayla) -> Openhanded(gwenette))\nforall x (Overwork(x, gwenette) and Leave(x, gwenette) -> Outshout(x, cayla))\n\nWorth(gwenette)\n\ntherefore Worth(gwenette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The derk centre the alvin. The derk is algophobic. The derk is torturing. The derk is deserted. The derk is rolling. The derk is needled. The derk destine the alvin. The derk highlight the alvin. The alvin centre the derk. The alvin is algophobic. The alvin is not deserted. The alvin is rolling. The alvin is not needled. The alvin destine the derk. The alvin highlight the derk. If something centre the alvin and it highlight the derk then the alvin is torturing. If something centre the alvin and it destine the alvin then it highlight the derk. The alvin is not algophobic.", "logic": "\nCentre(derk, alvin)\nAlgophobic(derk)\nTorturing(derk)\nDeserted(derk)\nRolling(derk)\nNeedled(derk)\nDestine(derk, alvin)\nHighlight(derk, alvin)\nCentre(alvin, derk)\nAlgophobic(alvin)\nnot Deserted(alvin)\nRolling(alvin)\nnot Needled(alvin)\nDestine(alvin, derk)\nHighlight(alvin, derk)\nforall x (Centre(x, alvin) and Highlight(x, derk) -> Torturing(alvin))\nforall x (Centre(x, alvin) and Destine(x, alvin) -> Highlight(x, derk))\n\nnot Algophobic(alvin)\n\ntherefore Algophobic(alvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The jackelyn thud the babs. The jackelyn is groomed. The jackelyn is adverbial. The jackelyn is acronymic. The jackelyn is riemannian. The jackelyn is offsides. The jackelyn halve the babs. The jackelyn haul the babs. The babs thud the jackelyn. The babs is groomed. The babs is not acronymic. The babs is riemannian. The babs is not offsides. The babs halve the jackelyn. The babs haul the jackelyn. If something thud the babs and it haul the jackelyn then the babs is adverbial. If something thud the babs and it halve the babs then it haul the jackelyn. The jackelyn haul the jackelyn.", "logic": "\nThud(jackelyn, babs)\nGroomed(jackelyn)\nAdverbial(jackelyn)\nAcronymic(jackelyn)\nRiemannian(jackelyn)\nOffsides(jackelyn)\nHalve(jackelyn, babs)\nHaul(jackelyn, babs)\nThud(babs, jackelyn)\nGroomed(babs)\nnot Acronymic(babs)\nRiemannian(babs)\nnot Offsides(babs)\nHalve(babs, jackelyn)\nHaul(babs, jackelyn)\nforall x (Thud(x, babs) and Haul(x, jackelyn) -> Adverbial(babs))\nforall x (Thud(x, babs) and Halve(x, babs) -> Haul(x, jackelyn))\n\nHaul(jackelyn, jackelyn)\n\nThud(jackelyn, babs) and Halve(jackelyn, babs) and forall x (Thud(x, babs) and Halve(x, babs) -> Haul(x, jackelyn)) -> therefore Haul(jackelyn, jackelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The venkat muddle the otes. The venkat is exothermal. The venkat is deskbound. The venkat is sightly. The venkat is finical. The venkat is flatbottom. The venkat shingle the otes. The venkat pride the otes. The otes muddle the venkat. The otes is exothermal. The otes is not sightly. The otes is finical. The otes is not flatbottom. The otes shingle the venkat. The otes pride the venkat. If something muddle the otes and it pride the venkat then the otes is deskbound. If something muddle the otes and it shingle the otes then it pride the venkat. The venkat does not visit the venkat.", "logic": "\nMuddle(venkat, otes)\nExothermal(venkat)\nDeskbound(venkat)\nSightly(venkat)\nFinical(venkat)\nFlatbottom(venkat)\nShingle(venkat, otes)\nPride(venkat, otes)\nMuddle(otes, venkat)\nExothermal(otes)\nnot Sightly(otes)\nFinical(otes)\nnot Flatbottom(otes)\nShingle(otes, venkat)\nPride(otes, venkat)\nforall x (Muddle(x, otes) and Pride(x, venkat) -> Deskbound(otes))\nforall x (Muddle(x, otes) and Shingle(x, otes) -> Pride(x, venkat))\n\nnot Pride(venkat, venkat)\n\nMuddle(venkat, otes) and Shingle(venkat, otes) and forall x (Muddle(x, otes) and Shingle(x, otes) -> Pride(x, venkat)) -> therefore Pride(venkat, venkat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The chelsey womanise the legra. The chelsey is acidic. The chelsey is aspheric. The chelsey is colonic. The chelsey is awninged. The chelsey is infertile. The chelsey copyright the legra. The chelsey conjecture the legra. The legra womanise the chelsey. The legra is acidic. The legra is not colonic. The legra is awninged. The legra is not infertile. The legra copyright the chelsey. The legra conjecture the chelsey. If something womanise the legra and it conjecture the chelsey then the legra is aspheric. If something womanise the legra and it copyright the legra then it conjecture the chelsey. The legra is aspheric.", "logic": "\nWomanise(chelsey, legra)\nAcidic(chelsey)\nAspheric(chelsey)\nColonic(chelsey)\nAwninged(chelsey)\nInfertile(chelsey)\nCopyright(chelsey, legra)\nConjecture(chelsey, legra)\nWomanise(legra, chelsey)\nAcidic(legra)\nnot Colonic(legra)\nAwninged(legra)\nnot Infertile(legra)\nCopyright(legra, chelsey)\nConjecture(legra, chelsey)\nforall x (Womanise(x, legra) and Conjecture(x, chelsey) -> Aspheric(legra))\nforall x (Womanise(x, legra) and Copyright(x, legra) -> Conjecture(x, chelsey))\n\nAspheric(legra)\n\nWomanise(chelsey, legra) and Copyright(chelsey, legra) and forall x (Womanise(x, legra) and Copyright(x, legra) -> Conjecture(x, chelsey)) -> therefore Conjecture(chelsey, chelsey) Womanise(chelsey, legra) and Conjecture(chelsey, chelsey) and forall x (Womanise(x, legra) and Conjecture(x, chelsey) -> Aspheric(legra)) -> therefore Aspheric(legra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The rhiamon slop the urbain. The rhiamon is esthetic. The rhiamon is missional. The rhiamon is climatical. The rhiamon is calycular. The rhiamon is neckless. The rhiamon incubate the urbain. The rhiamon deodorize the urbain. The urbain slop the rhiamon. The urbain is esthetic. The urbain is not climatical. The urbain is calycular. The urbain is not neckless. The urbain incubate the rhiamon. The urbain deodorize the rhiamon. If something slop the urbain and it deodorize the rhiamon then the urbain is missional. If something slop the urbain and it incubate the urbain then it deodorize the rhiamon. The urbain is not missional.", "logic": "\nSlop(rhiamon, urbain)\nEsthetic(rhiamon)\nMissional(rhiamon)\nClimatical(rhiamon)\nCalycular(rhiamon)\nNeckless(rhiamon)\nIncubate(rhiamon, urbain)\nDeodorize(rhiamon, urbain)\nSlop(urbain, rhiamon)\nEsthetic(urbain)\nnot Climatical(urbain)\nCalycular(urbain)\nnot Neckless(urbain)\nIncubate(urbain, rhiamon)\nDeodorize(urbain, rhiamon)\nforall x (Slop(x, urbain) and Deodorize(x, rhiamon) -> Missional(urbain))\nforall x (Slop(x, urbain) and Incubate(x, urbain) -> Deodorize(x, rhiamon))\n\nnot Missional(urbain)\n\nSlop(rhiamon, urbain) and Incubate(rhiamon, urbain) and forall x (Slop(x, urbain) and Incubate(x, urbain) -> Deodorize(x, rhiamon)) -> therefore Deodorize(rhiamon, rhiamon) Slop(rhiamon, urbain) and Deodorize(rhiamon, rhiamon) and forall x (Slop(x, urbain) and Deodorize(x, rhiamon) -> Missional(urbain)) -> therefore Missional(urbain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The madella conspire the lanny. The madella is individual. The madella is aspirant. The madella is paltry. The madella is caulescent. The madella is acetic. The madella saponify the lanny. The madella expense the lanny. The lanny conspire the madella. The lanny is individual. The lanny is not paltry. The lanny is caulescent. The lanny is not acetic. The lanny saponify the madella. The lanny expense the madella. If something conspire the lanny and it expense the madella then the lanny is aspirant. If something conspire the lanny and it saponify the lanny then it expense the madella. The madella does not need the madella.", "logic": "\nConspire(madella, lanny)\nIndividual(madella)\nAspirant(madella)\nPaltry(madella)\nCaulescent(madella)\nAcetic(madella)\nSaponify(madella, lanny)\nExpense(madella, lanny)\nConspire(lanny, madella)\nIndividual(lanny)\nnot Paltry(lanny)\nCaulescent(lanny)\nnot Acetic(lanny)\nSaponify(lanny, madella)\nExpense(lanny, madella)\nforall x (Conspire(x, lanny) and Expense(x, madella) -> Aspirant(lanny))\nforall x (Conspire(x, lanny) and Saponify(x, lanny) -> Expense(x, madella))\n\nnot Saponify(madella, madella)\n\nnot Saponify(madella, madella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The ellette modernise the jason. The ellette is prodigious. The ellette is sporadic. The ellette is anapestic. The ellette is herbal. The ellette is pleonastic. The ellette heel the jason. The ellette slat the jason. The jason modernise the ellette. The jason is prodigious. The jason is not anapestic. The jason is herbal. The jason is not pleonastic. The jason heel the ellette. The jason slat the ellette. If something modernise the jason and it slat the ellette then the jason is sporadic. If something modernise the jason and it heel the jason then it slat the ellette. The jason heel the jason.", "logic": "\nModernise(ellette, jason)\nProdigious(ellette)\nSporadic(ellette)\nAnapestic(ellette)\nHerbal(ellette)\nPleonastic(ellette)\nHeel(ellette, jason)\nSlat(ellette, jason)\nModernise(jason, ellette)\nProdigious(jason)\nnot Anapestic(jason)\nHerbal(jason)\nnot Pleonastic(jason)\nHeel(jason, ellette)\nSlat(jason, ellette)\nforall x (Modernise(x, jason) and Slat(x, ellette) -> Sporadic(jason))\nforall x (Modernise(x, jason) and Heel(x, jason) -> Slat(x, ellette))\n\nHeel(jason, jason)\n\nHeel(jason, jason) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The tressa manure the neil. The tressa is professed. The tressa is waking. The tressa is toxicant. The tressa is croatian. The tressa is proto. The tressa suspect the neil. The tressa knell the neil. The neil manure the tressa. The neil is professed. The neil is not toxicant. The neil is croatian. The neil is not proto. The neil suspect the tressa. The neil knell the tressa. If something manure the neil and it knell the tressa then the neil is waking. If something manure the neil and it suspect the neil then it knell the tressa. The neil does not eat the neil.", "logic": "\nManure(tressa, neil)\nProfessed(tressa)\nWaking(tressa)\nToxicant(tressa)\nCroatian(tressa)\nProto(tressa)\nSuspect(tressa, neil)\nKnell(tressa, neil)\nManure(neil, tressa)\nProfessed(neil)\nnot Toxicant(neil)\nCroatian(neil)\nnot Proto(neil)\nSuspect(neil, tressa)\nKnell(neil, tressa)\nforall x (Manure(x, neil) and Knell(x, tressa) -> Waking(neil))\nforall x (Manure(x, neil) and Suspect(x, neil) -> Knell(x, tressa))\n\nnot Manure(neil, neil)\n\nnot Manure(neil, neil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The bryon benight the marsha. The bryon is funguslike. The bryon is impeccant. The bryon is itchy. The bryon is phonetic. The bryon is ratlike. The bryon halloo the marsha. The bryon alcoholize the marsha. The marsha benight the bryon. The marsha is funguslike. The marsha is not itchy. The marsha is phonetic. The marsha is not ratlike. The marsha halloo the bryon. The marsha alcoholize the bryon. If something benight the marsha and it alcoholize the bryon then the marsha is impeccant. If something benight the marsha and it halloo the marsha then it alcoholize the bryon. The bryon benight the bryon.", "logic": "\nBenight(bryon, marsha)\nFunguslike(bryon)\nImpeccant(bryon)\nItchy(bryon)\nPhonetic(bryon)\nRatlike(bryon)\nHalloo(bryon, marsha)\nAlcoholize(bryon, marsha)\nBenight(marsha, bryon)\nFunguslike(marsha)\nnot Itchy(marsha)\nPhonetic(marsha)\nnot Ratlike(marsha)\nHalloo(marsha, bryon)\nAlcoholize(marsha, bryon)\nforall x (Benight(x, marsha) and Alcoholize(x, bryon) -> Impeccant(marsha))\nforall x (Benight(x, marsha) and Halloo(x, marsha) -> Alcoholize(x, bryon))\n\nBenight(bryon, bryon)\n\nBenight(bryon, bryon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "The taffy mulch the annadiana. The cameron mulch the annadiana. The annadiana itemize the molli. The molli objurgate the annadiana. If someone objurgate the molli and the molli itemize the taffy then the molli objurgate the cameron. If someone itemize the annadiana and the annadiana is barehanded then the annadiana is chaffy. If someone mulch the annadiana and they see the taffy then they need the annadiana. If someone objurgate the annadiana and they are grainy then they visit the cameron. If someone mulch the taffy and they are invalid then the taffy is chaffy. If someone mulch the annadiana then they see the taffy. The taffy mulch the annadiana.", "logic": "\nMulch(taffy, annadiana)\nMulch(cameron, annadiana)\nItemize(annadiana, molli)\nObjurgate(molli, annadiana)\nforall x (Objurgate(x, molli) and Itemize(molli, taffy) -> Objurgate(molli, cameron))\nforall x (Itemize(x, annadiana) and Barehanded(annadiana) -> Chaffy(annadiana))\nforall x (Mulch(x, annadiana) and Mulch(x, taffy) -> Itemize(x, annadiana))\nforall x (Objurgate(x, annadiana) and Grainy(x) -> Objurgate(x, cameron))\nforall x (Mulch(x, taffy) and Invalid(x) -> Chaffy(taffy))\nforall x (Mulch(x, annadiana) -> Mulch(x, taffy))\n\nMulch(taffy, annadiana)\n\ntherefore Mulch(taffy, annadiana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The noland truncate the rozina. The jemmy truncate the rozina. The rozina revolt the flem. The flem squint the rozina. If someone squint the flem and the flem revolt the noland then the flem squint the jemmy. If someone revolt the rozina and the rozina is majestic then the rozina is maintained. If someone truncate the rozina and they see the noland then they need the rozina. If someone squint the rozina and they are operculate then they visit the jemmy. If someone truncate the noland and they are glassless then the noland is maintained. If someone truncate the rozina then they see the noland. The jemmy does not see the rozina.", "logic": "\nTruncate(noland, rozina)\nTruncate(jemmy, rozina)\nRevolt(rozina, flem)\nSquint(flem, rozina)\nforall x (Squint(x, flem) and Revolt(flem, noland) -> Squint(flem, jemmy))\nforall x (Revolt(x, rozina) and Majestic(rozina) -> Maintained(rozina))\nforall x (Truncate(x, rozina) and Truncate(x, noland) -> Revolt(x, rozina))\nforall x (Squint(x, rozina) and Operculate(x) -> Squint(x, jemmy))\nforall x (Truncate(x, noland) and Glassless(x) -> Maintained(noland))\nforall x (Truncate(x, rozina) -> Truncate(x, noland))\n\nnot Truncate(jemmy, rozina)\n\ntherefore Truncate(jemmy, rozina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The thatch reshuffle the beitris. The dulci reshuffle the beitris. The beitris aggrade the vallie. The vallie frame the beitris. If someone frame the vallie and the vallie aggrade the thatch then the vallie frame the dulci. If someone aggrade the beitris and the beitris is patched then the beitris is peaty. If someone reshuffle the beitris and they see the thatch then they need the beitris. If someone frame the beitris and they are chambered then they visit the dulci. If someone reshuffle the thatch and they are unfounded then the thatch is peaty. If someone reshuffle the beitris then they see the thatch. The thatch reshuffle the thatch.", "logic": "\nReshuffle(thatch, beitris)\nReshuffle(dulci, beitris)\nAggrade(beitris, vallie)\nFrame(vallie, beitris)\nforall x (Frame(x, vallie) and Aggrade(vallie, thatch) -> Frame(vallie, dulci))\nforall x (Aggrade(x, beitris) and Patched(beitris) -> Peaty(beitris))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, beitris) and Reshuffle(x, thatch) -> Aggrade(x, beitris))\nforall x (Frame(x, beitris) and Chambered(x) -> Frame(x, dulci))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, thatch) and Unfounded(x) -> Peaty(thatch))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, beitris) -> Reshuffle(x, thatch))\n\nReshuffle(thatch, thatch)\n\nReshuffle(thatch, beitris) and forall x (Reshuffle(x, beitris) -> Reshuffle(x, thatch)) -> therefore Reshuffle(thatch, thatch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The inglebert blackberry the tammara. The dona blackberry the tammara. The tammara care the son. The son water the tammara. If someone water the son and the son care the inglebert then the son water the dona. If someone care the tammara and the tammara is chimeric then the tammara is sinister. If someone blackberry the tammara and they see the inglebert then they need the tammara. If someone water the tammara and they are wraithlike then they visit the dona. If someone blackberry the inglebert and they are eolotropic then the inglebert is sinister. If someone blackberry the tammara then they see the inglebert. The dona does not see the inglebert.", "logic": "\nBlackberry(inglebert, tammara)\nBlackberry(dona, tammara)\nCare(tammara, son)\nWater(son, tammara)\nforall x (Water(x, son) and Care(son, inglebert) -> Water(son, dona))\nforall x (Care(x, tammara) and Chimeric(tammara) -> Sinister(tammara))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, tammara) and Blackberry(x, inglebert) -> Care(x, tammara))\nforall x (Water(x, tammara) and Wraithlike(x) -> Water(x, dona))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, inglebert) and Eolotropic(x) -> Sinister(inglebert))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, tammara) -> Blackberry(x, inglebert))\n\nnot Blackberry(dona, inglebert)\n\nBlackberry(dona, tammara) and forall x (Blackberry(x, tammara) -> Blackberry(x, inglebert)) -> therefore Blackberry(dona, inglebert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The albina withstand the fonsie. The tabatha withstand the fonsie. The fonsie trivialize the craig. The craig flounce the fonsie. If someone flounce the craig and the craig trivialize the albina then the craig flounce the tabatha. If someone trivialize the fonsie and the fonsie is photic then the fonsie is unwearable. If someone withstand the fonsie and they see the albina then they need the fonsie. If someone flounce the fonsie and they are selfsame then they visit the tabatha. If someone withstand the albina and they are ferned then the albina is unwearable. If someone withstand the fonsie then they see the albina. The albina trivialize the fonsie.", "logic": "\nWithstand(albina, fonsie)\nWithstand(tabatha, fonsie)\nTrivialize(fonsie, craig)\nFlounce(craig, fonsie)\nforall x (Flounce(x, craig) and Trivialize(craig, albina) -> Flounce(craig, tabatha))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, fonsie) and Photic(fonsie) -> Unwearable(fonsie))\nforall x (Withstand(x, fonsie) and Withstand(x, albina) -> Trivialize(x, fonsie))\nforall x (Flounce(x, fonsie) and Selfsame(x) -> Flounce(x, tabatha))\nforall x (Withstand(x, albina) and Ferned(x) -> Unwearable(albina))\nforall x (Withstand(x, fonsie) -> Withstand(x, albina))\n\nTrivialize(albina, fonsie)\n\nWithstand(albina, fonsie) and forall x (Withstand(x, fonsie) -> Withstand(x, albina)) -> therefore Withstand(albina, albina) Withstand(albina, fonsie) and Withstand(albina, albina) and forall x (Withstand(x, fonsie) and Withstand(x, albina) -> Trivialize(x, fonsie)) -> therefore Trivialize(albina, fonsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The collins array the kaylil. The lilah array the kaylil. The kaylil round the deana. The deana bonderise the kaylil. If someone bonderise the deana and the deana round the collins then the deana bonderise the lilah. If someone round the kaylil and the kaylil is frightened then the kaylil is disturbed. If someone array the kaylil and they see the collins then they need the kaylil. If someone bonderise the kaylil and they are plastered then they visit the lilah. If someone array the collins and they are leaded then the collins is disturbed. If someone array the kaylil then they see the collins. The lilah does not need the kaylil.", "logic": "\nArray(collins, kaylil)\nArray(lilah, kaylil)\nRound(kaylil, deana)\nBonderise(deana, kaylil)\nforall x (Bonderise(x, deana) and Round(deana, collins) -> Bonderise(deana, lilah))\nforall x (Round(x, kaylil) and Frightened(kaylil) -> Disturbed(kaylil))\nforall x (Array(x, kaylil) and Array(x, collins) -> Round(x, kaylil))\nforall x (Bonderise(x, kaylil) and Plastered(x) -> Bonderise(x, lilah))\nforall x (Array(x, collins) and Leaded(x) -> Disturbed(collins))\nforall x (Array(x, kaylil) -> Array(x, collins))\n\nnot Round(lilah, kaylil)\n\nArray(lilah, kaylil) and forall x (Array(x, kaylil) -> Array(x, collins)) -> therefore Array(lilah, collins) Array(lilah, kaylil) and Array(lilah, collins) and forall x (Array(x, kaylil) and Array(x, collins) -> Round(x, kaylil)) -> therefore Round(lilah, kaylil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The berry buffalo the tomiko. The evan buffalo the tomiko. The tomiko drub the marylee. The marylee trample the tomiko. If someone trample the marylee and the marylee drub the berry then the marylee trample the evan. If someone drub the tomiko and the tomiko is satiable then the tomiko is uninsured. If someone buffalo the tomiko and they see the berry then they need the tomiko. If someone trample the tomiko and they are fatherless then they visit the evan. If someone buffalo the berry and they are undepicted then the berry is uninsured. If someone buffalo the tomiko then they see the berry. The marylee does not need the tomiko.", "logic": "\nBuffalo(berry, tomiko)\nBuffalo(evan, tomiko)\nDrub(tomiko, marylee)\nTrample(marylee, tomiko)\nforall x (Trample(x, marylee) and Drub(marylee, berry) -> Trample(marylee, evan))\nforall x (Drub(x, tomiko) and Satiable(tomiko) -> Uninsured(tomiko))\nforall x (Buffalo(x, tomiko) and Buffalo(x, berry) -> Drub(x, tomiko))\nforall x (Trample(x, tomiko) and Fatherless(x) -> Trample(x, evan))\nforall x (Buffalo(x, berry) and Undepicted(x) -> Uninsured(berry))\nforall x (Buffalo(x, tomiko) -> Buffalo(x, berry))\n\nnot Drub(marylee, tomiko)\n\nforall x (Buffalo(x, tomiko) and Buffalo(x, berry) -> Drub(x, tomiko)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The roxie unsaddle the lovell. The jessamine unsaddle the lovell. The lovell rocket the babs. The babs mushroom the lovell. If someone mushroom the babs and the babs rocket the roxie then the babs mushroom the jessamine. If someone rocket the lovell and the lovell is inmost then the lovell is fatalist. If someone unsaddle the lovell and they see the roxie then they need the lovell. If someone mushroom the lovell and they are cissy then they visit the jessamine. If someone unsaddle the roxie and they are nonnomadic then the roxie is fatalist. If someone unsaddle the lovell then they see the roxie. The roxie mushroom the jessamine.", "logic": "\nUnsaddle(roxie, lovell)\nUnsaddle(jessamine, lovell)\nRocket(lovell, babs)\nMushroom(babs, lovell)\nforall x (Mushroom(x, babs) and Rocket(babs, roxie) -> Mushroom(babs, jessamine))\nforall x (Rocket(x, lovell) and Inmost(lovell) -> Fatalist(lovell))\nforall x (Unsaddle(x, lovell) and Unsaddle(x, roxie) -> Rocket(x, lovell))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, lovell) and Cissy(x) -> Mushroom(x, jessamine))\nforall x (Unsaddle(x, roxie) and Nonnomadic(x) -> Fatalist(roxie))\nforall x (Unsaddle(x, lovell) -> Unsaddle(x, roxie))\n\nMushroom(roxie, jessamine)\n\nforall x (Mushroom(x, lovell) and Cissy(x) -> Mushroom(x, jessamine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The haywood garrote the yehudit. The ashly garrote the yehudit. The yehudit lallygag the ruella. The ruella agenise the yehudit. If someone agenise the ruella and the ruella lallygag the haywood then the ruella agenise the ashly. If someone lallygag the yehudit and the yehudit is blatant then the yehudit is reechoing. If someone garrote the yehudit and they see the haywood then they need the yehudit. If someone agenise the yehudit and they are romish then they visit the ashly. If someone garrote the haywood and they are framed then the haywood is reechoing. If someone garrote the yehudit then they see the haywood. The yehudit does not see the haywood.", "logic": "\nGarrote(haywood, yehudit)\nGarrote(ashly, yehudit)\nLallygag(yehudit, ruella)\nAgenise(ruella, yehudit)\nforall x (Agenise(x, ruella) and Lallygag(ruella, haywood) -> Agenise(ruella, ashly))\nforall x (Lallygag(x, yehudit) and Blatant(yehudit) -> Reechoing(yehudit))\nforall x (Garrote(x, yehudit) and Garrote(x, haywood) -> Lallygag(x, yehudit))\nforall x (Agenise(x, yehudit) and Romish(x) -> Agenise(x, ashly))\nforall x (Garrote(x, haywood) and Framed(x) -> Reechoing(haywood))\nforall x (Garrote(x, yehudit) -> Garrote(x, haywood))\n\nnot Garrote(yehudit, haywood)\n\nforall x (Garrote(x, yehudit) -> Garrote(x, haywood)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The karoline accustom the gabbi. The crystal accustom the gabbi. The gabbi taxi the sampson. The sampson reassess the gabbi. If someone reassess the sampson and the sampson taxi the karoline then the sampson reassess the crystal. If someone taxi the gabbi and the gabbi is sanitised then the gabbi is tremendous. If someone accustom the gabbi and they see the karoline then they need the gabbi. If someone reassess the gabbi and they are shoed then they visit the crystal. If someone accustom the karoline and they are epiphyseal then the karoline is tremendous. If someone accustom the gabbi then they see the karoline. The gabbi is sanitised.", "logic": "\nAccustom(karoline, gabbi)\nAccustom(crystal, gabbi)\nTaxi(gabbi, sampson)\nReassess(sampson, gabbi)\nforall x (Reassess(x, sampson) and Taxi(sampson, karoline) -> Reassess(sampson, crystal))\nforall x (Taxi(x, gabbi) and Sanitised(gabbi) -> Tremendous(gabbi))\nforall x (Accustom(x, gabbi) and Accustom(x, karoline) -> Taxi(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Reassess(x, gabbi) and Shoed(x) -> Reassess(x, crystal))\nforall x (Accustom(x, karoline) and Epiphyseal(x) -> Tremendous(karoline))\nforall x (Accustom(x, gabbi) -> Accustom(x, karoline))\n\nSanitised(gabbi)\n\nSanitised(gabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The hirsch subtilize the roseann. The aloysius subtilize the roseann. The roseann proctor the mel. The mel subluxate the roseann. If someone subluxate the mel and the mel proctor the hirsch then the mel subluxate the aloysius. If someone proctor the roseann and the roseann is rumansh then the roseann is odious. If someone subtilize the roseann and they see the hirsch then they need the roseann. If someone subluxate the roseann and they are taped then they visit the aloysius. If someone subtilize the hirsch and they are jerking then the hirsch is odious. If someone subtilize the roseann then they see the hirsch. The roseann does not visit the mel.", "logic": "\nSubtilize(hirsch, roseann)\nSubtilize(aloysius, roseann)\nProctor(roseann, mel)\nSubluxate(mel, roseann)\nforall x (Subluxate(x, mel) and Proctor(mel, hirsch) -> Subluxate(mel, aloysius))\nforall x (Proctor(x, roseann) and Rumansh(roseann) -> Odious(roseann))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, roseann) and Subtilize(x, hirsch) -> Proctor(x, roseann))\nforall x (Subluxate(x, roseann) and Taped(x) -> Subluxate(x, aloysius))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, hirsch) and Jerking(x) -> Odious(hirsch))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, roseann) -> Subtilize(x, hirsch))\n\nnot Subluxate(roseann, mel)\n\nnot Subluxate(roseann, mel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The ambros syllabise the sherrie. The hanna syllabise the sherrie. The sherrie bebop the merril. The merril general the sherrie. If someone general the merril and the merril bebop the ambros then the merril general the hanna. If someone bebop the sherrie and the sherrie is pliant then the sherrie is addable. If someone syllabise the sherrie and they see the ambros then they need the sherrie. If someone general the sherrie and they are pakistani then they visit the hanna. If someone syllabise the ambros and they are punishing then the ambros is addable. If someone syllabise the sherrie then they see the ambros. The merril is addable.", "logic": "\nSyllabise(ambros, sherrie)\nSyllabise(hanna, sherrie)\nBebop(sherrie, merril)\nGeneral(merril, sherrie)\nforall x (General(x, merril) and Bebop(merril, ambros) -> General(merril, hanna))\nforall x (Bebop(x, sherrie) and Pliant(sherrie) -> Addable(sherrie))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, sherrie) and Syllabise(x, ambros) -> Bebop(x, sherrie))\nforall x (General(x, sherrie) and Pakistani(x) -> General(x, hanna))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, ambros) and Punishing(x) -> Addable(ambros))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, sherrie) -> Syllabise(x, ambros))\n\nAddable(merril)\n\nAddable(merril) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The neale rotate the blare. The alanna sterilize the neale. The blare rotate the alanna. The ossie is not overlying. If someone rotate the blare then the blare sterilize the alanna. If the neale is exculpated and the neale is signal then the neale is glabellar. If someone sterilize the alanna then the alanna sterilize the blare. If the ossie invade the alanna and the ossie invade the neale then the neale rotate the ossie. If someone is exculpated and they do not chase the alanna then the alanna rotate the neale. If someone sterilize the alanna and they do not visit the ossie then they need the neale. The ossie is not overlying.", "logic": "\nRotate(neale, blare)\nSterilize(alanna, neale)\nRotate(blare, alanna)\nnot Overlying(ossie)\nforall x (Rotate(x, blare) -> Sterilize(blare, alanna))\nExculpated(neale) and Signal(neale) -> Glabellar(neale)\nforall x (Sterilize(x, alanna) -> Sterilize(alanna, blare))\nInvade(ossie, alanna) and Invade(ossie, neale) -> Rotate(neale, ossie)\nforall x (Exculpated(x) and not Invade(x, alanna) -> Rotate(alanna, neale))\nforall x (Sterilize(x, alanna) and not Rotate(x, ossie) -> Sterilize(x, neale))\n\nnot Overlying(ossie)\n\ntherefore not Overlying(ossie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The erwin disjoint the winona. The engracia overfeed the erwin. The winona disjoint the engracia. The orsola is not bacillar. If someone disjoint the winona then the winona overfeed the engracia. If the erwin is evergreen and the erwin is eponymic then the erwin is burning. If someone overfeed the engracia then the engracia overfeed the winona. If the orsola capsulize the engracia and the orsola capsulize the erwin then the erwin disjoint the orsola. If someone is evergreen and they do not chase the engracia then the engracia disjoint the erwin. If someone overfeed the engracia and they do not visit the orsola then they need the erwin. The engracia does not need the erwin.", "logic": "\nDisjoint(erwin, winona)\nOverfeed(engracia, erwin)\nDisjoint(winona, engracia)\nnot Bacillar(orsola)\nforall x (Disjoint(x, winona) -> Overfeed(winona, engracia))\nEvergreen(erwin) and Eponymic(erwin) -> Burning(erwin)\nforall x (Overfeed(x, engracia) -> Overfeed(engracia, winona))\nCapsulize(orsola, engracia) and Capsulize(orsola, erwin) -> Disjoint(erwin, orsola)\nforall x (Evergreen(x) and not Capsulize(x, engracia) -> Disjoint(engracia, erwin))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, engracia) and not Disjoint(x, orsola) -> Overfeed(x, erwin))\n\nnot Overfeed(engracia, erwin)\n\ntherefore Overfeed(engracia, erwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The cortney merge the matilda. The cathie seel the cortney. The matilda merge the cathie. The jen is not edentulate. If someone merge the matilda then the matilda seel the cathie. If the cortney is youthful and the cortney is chaldaean then the cortney is idealised. If someone seel the cathie then the cathie seel the matilda. If the jen quiver the cathie and the jen quiver the cortney then the cortney merge the jen. If someone is youthful and they do not chase the cathie then the cathie merge the cortney. If someone seel the cathie and they do not visit the jen then they need the cortney. The matilda seel the cathie.", "logic": "\nMerge(cortney, matilda)\nSeel(cathie, cortney)\nMerge(matilda, cathie)\nnot Edentulate(jen)\nforall x (Merge(x, matilda) -> Seel(matilda, cathie))\nYouthful(cortney) and Chaldaean(cortney) -> Idealised(cortney)\nforall x (Seel(x, cathie) -> Seel(cathie, matilda))\nQuiver(jen, cathie) and Quiver(jen, cortney) -> Merge(cortney, jen)\nforall x (Youthful(x) and not Quiver(x, cathie) -> Merge(cathie, cortney))\nforall x (Seel(x, cathie) and not Merge(x, jen) -> Seel(x, cortney))\n\nSeel(matilda, cathie)\n\nMerge(cortney, matilda) and forall x (Merge(x, matilda) -> Seel(matilda, cathie)) -> therefore Seel(matilda, cathie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The ricca pile the arnoldo. The carmela confide the ricca. The arnoldo pile the carmela. The eimile is not botonee. If someone pile the arnoldo then the arnoldo confide the carmela. If the ricca is muddy and the ricca is squally then the ricca is decorous. If someone confide the carmela then the carmela confide the arnoldo. If the eimile leap the carmela and the eimile leap the ricca then the ricca pile the eimile. If someone is muddy and they do not chase the carmela then the carmela pile the ricca. If someone confide the carmela and they do not visit the eimile then they need the ricca. The arnoldo does not need the carmela.", "logic": "\nPile(ricca, arnoldo)\nConfide(carmela, ricca)\nPile(arnoldo, carmela)\nnot Botonee(eimile)\nforall x (Pile(x, arnoldo) -> Confide(arnoldo, carmela))\nMuddy(ricca) and Squally(ricca) -> Decorous(ricca)\nforall x (Confide(x, carmela) -> Confide(carmela, arnoldo))\nLeap(eimile, carmela) and Leap(eimile, ricca) -> Pile(ricca, eimile)\nforall x (Muddy(x) and not Leap(x, carmela) -> Pile(carmela, ricca))\nforall x (Confide(x, carmela) and not Pile(x, eimile) -> Confide(x, ricca))\n\nnot Confide(arnoldo, carmela)\n\nPile(ricca, arnoldo) and forall x (Pile(x, arnoldo) -> Confide(arnoldo, carmela)) -> therefore Confide(arnoldo, carmela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The silvano jelly the thelma. The selina ball the silvano. The thelma jelly the selina. The abdul is not ulterior. If someone jelly the thelma then the thelma ball the selina. If the silvano is unlatched and the silvano is robotlike then the silvano is bluish. If someone ball the selina then the selina ball the thelma. If the abdul defy the selina and the abdul defy the silvano then the silvano jelly the abdul. If someone is unlatched and they do not chase the selina then the selina jelly the silvano. If someone ball the selina and they do not visit the abdul then they need the silvano. The selina ball the thelma.", "logic": "\nJelly(silvano, thelma)\nBall(selina, silvano)\nJelly(thelma, selina)\nnot Ulterior(abdul)\nforall x (Jelly(x, thelma) -> Ball(thelma, selina))\nUnlatched(silvano) and Robotlike(silvano) -> Bluish(silvano)\nforall x (Ball(x, selina) -> Ball(selina, thelma))\nDefy(abdul, selina) and Defy(abdul, silvano) -> Jelly(silvano, abdul)\nforall x (Unlatched(x) and not Defy(x, selina) -> Jelly(selina, silvano))\nforall x (Ball(x, selina) and not Jelly(x, abdul) -> Ball(x, silvano))\n\nBall(selina, thelma)\n\nJelly(silvano, thelma) and forall x (Jelly(x, thelma) -> Ball(thelma, selina)) -> therefore Ball(thelma, selina) Ball(thelma, selina) and forall x (Ball(x, selina) -> Ball(selina, thelma)) -> therefore Ball(selina, thelma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The isis gate the jerry. The etta pinnacle the isis. The jerry gate the etta. The durante is not shouldered. If someone gate the jerry then the jerry pinnacle the etta. If the isis is devalued and the isis is agraphic then the isis is motional. If someone pinnacle the etta then the etta pinnacle the jerry. If the durante sentence the etta and the durante sentence the isis then the isis gate the durante. If someone is devalued and they do not chase the etta then the etta gate the isis. If someone pinnacle the etta and they do not visit the durante then they need the isis. The etta does not need the jerry.", "logic": "\nGate(isis, jerry)\nPinnacle(etta, isis)\nGate(jerry, etta)\nnot Shouldered(durante)\nforall x (Gate(x, jerry) -> Pinnacle(jerry, etta))\nDevalued(isis) and Agraphic(isis) -> Motional(isis)\nforall x (Pinnacle(x, etta) -> Pinnacle(etta, jerry))\nSentence(durante, etta) and Sentence(durante, isis) -> Gate(isis, durante)\nforall x (Devalued(x) and not Sentence(x, etta) -> Gate(etta, isis))\nforall x (Pinnacle(x, etta) and not Gate(x, durante) -> Pinnacle(x, isis))\n\nnot Pinnacle(etta, jerry)\n\nGate(isis, jerry) and forall x (Gate(x, jerry) -> Pinnacle(jerry, etta)) -> therefore Pinnacle(jerry, etta) Pinnacle(jerry, etta) and forall x (Pinnacle(x, etta) -> Pinnacle(etta, jerry)) -> therefore Pinnacle(etta, jerry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The clifford conjugate the jerry. The kipp stuff the clifford. The jerry conjugate the kipp. The ezechiel is not lateral. If someone conjugate the jerry then the jerry stuff the kipp. If the clifford is inward and the clifford is absent then the clifford is average. If someone stuff the kipp then the kipp stuff the jerry. If the ezechiel debark the kipp and the ezechiel debark the clifford then the clifford conjugate the ezechiel. If someone is inward and they do not chase the kipp then the kipp conjugate the clifford. If someone stuff the kipp and they do not visit the ezechiel then they need the clifford. The ezechiel does not need the clifford.", "logic": "\nConjugate(clifford, jerry)\nStuff(kipp, clifford)\nConjugate(jerry, kipp)\nnot Lateral(ezechiel)\nforall x (Conjugate(x, jerry) -> Stuff(jerry, kipp))\nInward(clifford) and Absent(clifford) -> Average(clifford)\nforall x (Stuff(x, kipp) -> Stuff(kipp, jerry))\nDebark(ezechiel, kipp) and Debark(ezechiel, clifford) -> Conjugate(clifford, ezechiel)\nforall x (Inward(x) and not Debark(x, kipp) -> Conjugate(kipp, clifford))\nforall x (Stuff(x, kipp) and not Conjugate(x, ezechiel) -> Stuff(x, clifford))\n\nnot Stuff(ezechiel, clifford)\n\nforall x (Stuff(x, kipp) and not Conjugate(x, ezechiel) -> Stuff(x, clifford)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The loretta inactivate the yancey. The helaina feature the loretta. The yancey inactivate the helaina. The erich is not asphaltic. If someone inactivate the yancey then the yancey feature the helaina. If the loretta is plucked and the loretta is falcate then the loretta is bare. If someone feature the helaina then the helaina feature the yancey. If the erich overgorge the helaina and the erich overgorge the loretta then the loretta inactivate the erich. If someone is plucked and they do not chase the helaina then the helaina inactivate the loretta. If someone feature the helaina and they do not visit the erich then they need the loretta. The helaina inactivate the loretta.", "logic": "\nInactivate(loretta, yancey)\nFeature(helaina, loretta)\nInactivate(yancey, helaina)\nnot Asphaltic(erich)\nforall x (Inactivate(x, yancey) -> Feature(yancey, helaina))\nPlucked(loretta) and Falcate(loretta) -> Bare(loretta)\nforall x (Feature(x, helaina) -> Feature(helaina, yancey))\nOvergorge(erich, helaina) and Overgorge(erich, loretta) -> Inactivate(loretta, erich)\nforall x (Plucked(x) and not Overgorge(x, helaina) -> Inactivate(helaina, loretta))\nforall x (Feature(x, helaina) and not Inactivate(x, erich) -> Feature(x, loretta))\n\nInactivate(helaina, loretta)\n\nforall x (Plucked(x) and not Overgorge(x, helaina) -> Inactivate(helaina, loretta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The cristen writhe the barbey. The delilah shit the cristen. The barbey writhe the delilah. The jerold is not optional. If someone writhe the barbey then the barbey shit the delilah. If the cristen is rhyming and the cristen is profane then the cristen is flashy. If someone shit the delilah then the delilah shit the barbey. If the jerold spacewalk the delilah and the jerold spacewalk the cristen then the cristen writhe the jerold. If someone is rhyming and they do not chase the delilah then the delilah writhe the cristen. If someone shit the delilah and they do not visit the jerold then they need the cristen. The barbey does not need the cristen.", "logic": "\nWrithe(cristen, barbey)\nShit(delilah, cristen)\nWrithe(barbey, delilah)\nnot Optional(jerold)\nforall x (Writhe(x, barbey) -> Shit(barbey, delilah))\nRhyming(cristen) and Profane(cristen) -> Flashy(cristen)\nforall x (Shit(x, delilah) -> Shit(delilah, barbey))\nSpacewalk(jerold, delilah) and Spacewalk(jerold, cristen) -> Writhe(cristen, jerold)\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and not Spacewalk(x, delilah) -> Writhe(delilah, cristen))\nforall x (Shit(x, delilah) and not Writhe(x, jerold) -> Shit(x, cristen))\n\nnot Shit(barbey, cristen)\n\nforall x (Shit(x, delilah) and not Writhe(x, jerold) -> Shit(x, cristen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The raf reeve the astra. The shaw snowball the raf. The astra reeve the shaw. The bruce is not valorous. If someone reeve the astra then the astra snowball the shaw. If the raf is rose and the raf is crossbred then the raf is vasiform. If someone snowball the shaw then the shaw snowball the astra. If the bruce overdress the shaw and the bruce overdress the raf then the raf reeve the bruce. If someone is rose and they do not chase the shaw then the shaw reeve the raf. If someone snowball the shaw and they do not visit the bruce then they need the raf. The shaw is big.", "logic": "\nReeve(raf, astra)\nSnowball(shaw, raf)\nReeve(astra, shaw)\nnot Valorous(bruce)\nforall x (Reeve(x, astra) -> Snowball(astra, shaw))\nRose(raf) and Crossbred(raf) -> Vasiform(raf)\nforall x (Snowball(x, shaw) -> Snowball(shaw, astra))\nOverdress(bruce, shaw) and Overdress(bruce, raf) -> Reeve(raf, bruce)\nforall x (Rose(x) and not Overdress(x, shaw) -> Reeve(shaw, raf))\nforall x (Snowball(x, shaw) and not Reeve(x, bruce) -> Snowball(x, raf))\n\nBig(shaw)\n\nBig(shaw) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The beitris peddle the stillmann. The sean oxygenize the beitris. The stillmann peddle the sean. The sophey is not adrenergic. If someone peddle the stillmann then the stillmann oxygenize the sean. If the beitris is unaffected and the beitris is yellowish then the beitris is placative. If someone oxygenize the sean then the sean oxygenize the stillmann. If the sophey tucker the sean and the sophey tucker the beitris then the beitris peddle the sophey. If someone is unaffected and they do not chase the sean then the sean peddle the beitris. If someone oxygenize the sean and they do not visit the sophey then they need the beitris. The sean does not chase the sean.", "logic": "\nPeddle(beitris, stillmann)\nOxygenize(sean, beitris)\nPeddle(stillmann, sean)\nnot Adrenergic(sophey)\nforall x (Peddle(x, stillmann) -> Oxygenize(stillmann, sean))\nUnaffected(beitris) and Yellowish(beitris) -> Placative(beitris)\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, sean) -> Oxygenize(sean, stillmann))\nTucker(sophey, sean) and Tucker(sophey, beitris) -> Peddle(beitris, sophey)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and not Tucker(x, sean) -> Peddle(sean, beitris))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, sean) and not Peddle(x, sophey) -> Oxygenize(x, beitris))\n\nnot Tucker(sean, sean)\n\nnot Tucker(sean, sean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "The mallissa welter the cathleen. The hermia grasp the mallissa. The cathleen welter the hermia. The rolf is not unfeminine. If someone welter the cathleen then the cathleen grasp the hermia. If the mallissa is undogmatic and the mallissa is corporal then the mallissa is arboreous. If someone grasp the hermia then the hermia grasp the cathleen. If the rolf disesteem the hermia and the rolf disesteem the mallissa then the mallissa welter the rolf. If someone is undogmatic and they do not chase the hermia then the hermia welter the mallissa. If someone grasp the hermia and they do not visit the rolf then they need the mallissa. The cathleen grasp the rolf.", "logic": "\nWelter(mallissa, cathleen)\nGrasp(hermia, mallissa)\nWelter(cathleen, hermia)\nnot Unfeminine(rolf)\nforall x (Welter(x, cathleen) -> Grasp(cathleen, hermia))\nUndogmatic(mallissa) and Corporal(mallissa) -> Arboreous(mallissa)\nforall x (Grasp(x, hermia) -> Grasp(hermia, cathleen))\nDisesteem(rolf, hermia) and Disesteem(rolf, mallissa) -> Welter(mallissa, rolf)\nforall x (Undogmatic(x) and not Disesteem(x, hermia) -> Welter(hermia, mallissa))\nforall x (Grasp(x, hermia) and not Welter(x, rolf) -> Grasp(x, mallissa))\n\nGrasp(cathleen, rolf)\n\nGrasp(cathleen, rolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1108"} {"premises": "Livia is apheretic. Livia is moorish. Livia is naiant. Delcina is apheretic. Delcina is moorish. Delcina is gorgeous. Delcina is eudemonic. If Delcina is gorgeous and Delcina is diverging then Delcina is degraded. All apheretic things are diverging. Delcina is apheretic.", "logic": "\nApheretic(livia)\nMoorish(livia)\nNaiant(livia)\nApheretic(delcina)\nMoorish(delcina)\nGorgeous(delcina)\nEudemonic(delcina)\nGorgeous(delcina) and Diverging(delcina) -> Degraded(delcina)\nforall x (Apheretic(x) -> Diverging(x))\n\nApheretic(delcina)\n\ntherefore Apheretic(delcina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Melody is bungled. Melody is otherwise. Melody is knobbed. Keenan is bungled. Keenan is otherwise. Keenan is caller. Keenan is pellucid. If Keenan is caller and Keenan is bust then Keenan is wedged. All bungled things are bust. Melody is not knobbed.", "logic": "\nBungled(melody)\nOtherwise(melody)\nKnobbed(melody)\nBungled(keenan)\nOtherwise(keenan)\nCaller(keenan)\nPellucid(keenan)\nCaller(keenan) and Bust(keenan) -> Wedged(keenan)\nforall x (Bungled(x) -> Bust(x))\n\nnot Knobbed(melody)\n\ntherefore Knobbed(melody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Dana is offbeat. Dana is leery. Dana is unhatched. Kylila is offbeat. Kylila is leery. Kylila is braggy. Kylila is groundless. If Kylila is braggy and Kylila is worst then Kylila is marsupial. All offbeat things are worst. Dana is worst.", "logic": "\nOffbeat(dana)\nLeery(dana)\nUnhatched(dana)\nOffbeat(kylila)\nLeery(kylila)\nBraggy(kylila)\nGroundless(kylila)\nBraggy(kylila) and Worst(kylila) -> Marsupial(kylila)\nforall x (Offbeat(x) -> Worst(x))\n\nWorst(dana)\n\nOffbeat(dana) and forall x (Offbeat(x) -> Worst(x)) -> therefore Worst(dana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Hussein is wigged. Hussein is telluric. Hussein is insular. Harriot is wigged. Harriot is telluric. Harriot is shoed. Harriot is audile. If Harriot is shoed and Harriot is cheapjack then Harriot is impersonal. All wigged things are cheapjack. Harriot is not cheapjack.", "logic": "\nWigged(hussein)\nTelluric(hussein)\nInsular(hussein)\nWigged(harriot)\nTelluric(harriot)\nShoed(harriot)\nAudile(harriot)\nShoed(harriot) and Cheapjack(harriot) -> Impersonal(harriot)\nforall x (Wigged(x) -> Cheapjack(x))\n\nnot Cheapjack(harriot)\n\nWigged(harriot) and forall x (Wigged(x) -> Cheapjack(x)) -> therefore Cheapjack(harriot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Anita is astringent. Anita is awkward. Anita is rabid. Marcel is astringent. Marcel is awkward. Marcel is unlike. Marcel is tannic. If Marcel is unlike and Marcel is detected then Marcel is rank. All astringent things are detected. Marcel is rank.", "logic": "\nAstringent(anita)\nAwkward(anita)\nRabid(anita)\nAstringent(marcel)\nAwkward(marcel)\nUnlike(marcel)\nTannic(marcel)\nUnlike(marcel) and Detected(marcel) -> Rank(marcel)\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> Detected(x))\n\nRank(marcel)\n\nAstringent(marcel) and forall x (Astringent(x) -> Detected(x)) -> therefore Detected(marcel) Unlike(marcel) and Detected(marcel) and Unlike(marcel) and Detected(marcel) -> Rank(marcel) -> therefore Rank(marcel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Irita is clubfooted. Irita is finished. Irita is plundered. Dorian is clubfooted. Dorian is finished. Dorian is omissible. Dorian is apogamous. If Dorian is omissible and Dorian is vixenish then Dorian is grassless. All clubfooted things are vixenish. Dorian is not grassless.", "logic": "\nClubfooted(irita)\nFinished(irita)\nPlundered(irita)\nClubfooted(dorian)\nFinished(dorian)\nOmissible(dorian)\nApogamous(dorian)\nOmissible(dorian) and Vixenish(dorian) -> Grassless(dorian)\nforall x (Clubfooted(x) -> Vixenish(x))\n\nnot Grassless(dorian)\n\nClubfooted(dorian) and forall x (Clubfooted(x) -> Vixenish(x)) -> therefore Vixenish(dorian) Omissible(dorian) and Vixenish(dorian) and Omissible(dorian) and Vixenish(dorian) -> Grassless(dorian) -> therefore Grassless(dorian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Alyssa is archducal. Alyssa is smoothbore. Alyssa is velvet. Fabian is archducal. Fabian is smoothbore. Fabian is glued. Fabian is sclerosed. If Fabian is glued and Fabian is exilic then Fabian is objective. All archducal things are exilic. Alyssa is not glued.", "logic": "\nArchducal(alyssa)\nSmoothbore(alyssa)\nVelvet(alyssa)\nArchducal(fabian)\nSmoothbore(fabian)\nGlued(fabian)\nSclerosed(fabian)\nGlued(fabian) and Exilic(fabian) -> Objective(fabian)\nforall x (Archducal(x) -> Exilic(x))\n\nnot Glued(alyssa)\n\nnot Glued(alyssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Scotty is downy. Scotty is scarred. Scotty is godlike. Shorty is downy. Shorty is scarred. Shorty is mere. Shorty is victimised. If Shorty is mere and Shorty is musky then Shorty is valiant. All downy things are musky. Shorty is godlike.", "logic": "\nDowny(scotty)\nScarred(scotty)\nGodlike(scotty)\nDowny(shorty)\nScarred(shorty)\nMere(shorty)\nVictimised(shorty)\nMere(shorty) and Musky(shorty) -> Valiant(shorty)\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Musky(x))\n\nGodlike(shorty)\n\nGodlike(shorty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Ranice is emarginate. Ranice is sugary. Ranice is postpartum. Zarah is emarginate. Zarah is sugary. Zarah is advancing. Zarah is backstage. If Zarah is advancing and Zarah is lordless then Zarah is tall. All emarginate things are lordless. Ranice is not tall.", "logic": "\nEmarginate(ranice)\nSugary(ranice)\nPostpartum(ranice)\nEmarginate(zarah)\nSugary(zarah)\nAdvancing(zarah)\nBackstage(zarah)\nAdvancing(zarah) and Lordless(zarah) -> Tall(zarah)\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Lordless(x))\n\nnot Tall(ranice)\n\nnot Tall(ranice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "Amalle is amphibious. Amalle is crushed. Amalle is epiphysial. Codi is amphibious. Codi is crushed. Codi is xlvi. Codi is sceptered. If Codi is xlvi and Codi is weathered then Codi is tabular. All amphibious things are weathered. Amalle is sceptered.", "logic": "\nAmphibious(amalle)\nCrushed(amalle)\nEpiphysial(amalle)\nAmphibious(codi)\nCrushed(codi)\nXlvi(codi)\nSceptered(codi)\nXlvi(codi) and Weathered(codi) -> Tabular(codi)\nforall x (Amphibious(x) -> Weathered(x))\n\nSceptered(amalle)\n\nSceptered(amalle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2365"} {"premises": "The pavia found the philbert. The pavia does not chase the valaree. The pavia obey the philbert. The pavia does not eat the valaree. The pavia is believable. The pavia shut the valaree. The philbert found the joyous. The philbert is dainty. The philbert shut the joyous. The valaree does not chase the pavia. The valaree is copasetic. The valaree does not visit the philbert. The joyous found the valaree. The joyous does not eat the philbert. The joyous is believable. If something is dainty and it found the joyous then it shut the valaree. If something found the valaree and it obey the pavia then it shut the pavia. If something obey the philbert and the philbert does not chase the joyous then it shut the joyous. If something found the pavia and it found the joyous then it found the philbert. If something is dainty then it found the philbert. If something found the joyous then the joyous is dainty. The joyous found the valaree.", "logic": "\nFound(pavia, philbert)\nnot Found(pavia, valaree)\nObey(pavia, philbert)\nnot Obey(pavia, valaree)\nBelievable(pavia)\nShut(pavia, valaree)\nFound(philbert, joyous)\nDainty(philbert)\nShut(philbert, joyous)\nnot Found(valaree, pavia)\nCopasetic(valaree)\nnot Shut(valaree, philbert)\nFound(joyous, valaree)\nnot Obey(joyous, philbert)\nBelievable(joyous)\nforall x (Dainty(x) and Found(x, joyous) -> Shut(x, valaree))\nforall x (Found(x, valaree) and Obey(x, pavia) -> Shut(x, pavia))\nforall x (Obey(x, philbert) and not Found(philbert, joyous) -> Shut(x, joyous))\nforall x (Found(x, pavia) and Found(x, joyous) -> Found(x, philbert))\nforall x (Dainty(x) -> Found(x, philbert))\nforall x (Found(x, joyous) -> Dainty(joyous))\n\nFound(joyous, valaree)\n\ntherefore Found(joyous, valaree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The sergeant quintuple the ola. The sergeant does not chase the rowland. The sergeant flurry the ola. The sergeant does not eat the rowland. The sergeant is freckled. The sergeant novelise the rowland. The ola quintuple the sherry. The ola is apical. The ola novelise the sherry. The rowland does not chase the sergeant. The rowland is pledged. The rowland does not visit the ola. The sherry quintuple the rowland. The sherry does not eat the ola. The sherry is freckled. If something is apical and it quintuple the sherry then it novelise the rowland. If something quintuple the rowland and it flurry the sergeant then it novelise the sergeant. If something flurry the ola and the ola does not chase the sherry then it novelise the sherry. If something quintuple the sergeant and it quintuple the sherry then it quintuple the ola. If something is apical then it quintuple the ola. If something quintuple the sherry then the sherry is apical. The sergeant is not freckled.", "logic": "\nQuintuple(sergeant, ola)\nnot Quintuple(sergeant, rowland)\nFlurry(sergeant, ola)\nnot Flurry(sergeant, rowland)\nFreckled(sergeant)\nNovelise(sergeant, rowland)\nQuintuple(ola, sherry)\nApical(ola)\nNovelise(ola, sherry)\nnot Quintuple(rowland, sergeant)\nPledged(rowland)\nnot Novelise(rowland, ola)\nQuintuple(sherry, rowland)\nnot Flurry(sherry, ola)\nFreckled(sherry)\nforall x (Apical(x) and Quintuple(x, sherry) -> Novelise(x, rowland))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, rowland) and Flurry(x, sergeant) -> Novelise(x, sergeant))\nforall x (Flurry(x, ola) and not Quintuple(ola, sherry) -> Novelise(x, sherry))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, sergeant) and Quintuple(x, sherry) -> Quintuple(x, ola))\nforall x (Apical(x) -> Quintuple(x, ola))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, sherry) -> Apical(sherry))\n\nnot Freckled(sergeant)\n\ntherefore Freckled(sergeant)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The eolanda radiate the flor. The eolanda does not chase the judith. The eolanda shrivel the flor. The eolanda does not eat the judith. The eolanda is petrifying. The eolanda vulgarise the judith. The flor radiate the fritz. The flor is fleeceable. The flor vulgarise the fritz. The judith does not chase the eolanda. The judith is repellent. The judith does not visit the flor. The fritz radiate the judith. The fritz does not eat the flor. The fritz is petrifying. If something is fleeceable and it radiate the fritz then it vulgarise the judith. If something radiate the judith and it shrivel the eolanda then it vulgarise the eolanda. If something shrivel the flor and the flor does not chase the fritz then it vulgarise the fritz. If something radiate the eolanda and it radiate the fritz then it radiate the flor. If something is fleeceable then it radiate the flor. If something radiate the fritz then the fritz is fleeceable. The flor vulgarise the judith.", "logic": "\nRadiate(eolanda, flor)\nnot Radiate(eolanda, judith)\nShrivel(eolanda, flor)\nnot Shrivel(eolanda, judith)\nPetrifying(eolanda)\nVulgarise(eolanda, judith)\nRadiate(flor, fritz)\nFleeceable(flor)\nVulgarise(flor, fritz)\nnot Radiate(judith, eolanda)\nRepellent(judith)\nnot Vulgarise(judith, flor)\nRadiate(fritz, judith)\nnot Shrivel(fritz, flor)\nPetrifying(fritz)\nforall x (Fleeceable(x) and Radiate(x, fritz) -> Vulgarise(x, judith))\nforall x (Radiate(x, judith) and Shrivel(x, eolanda) -> Vulgarise(x, eolanda))\nforall x (Shrivel(x, flor) and not Radiate(flor, fritz) -> Vulgarise(x, fritz))\nforall x (Radiate(x, eolanda) and Radiate(x, fritz) -> Radiate(x, flor))\nforall x (Fleeceable(x) -> Radiate(x, flor))\nforall x (Radiate(x, fritz) -> Fleeceable(fritz))\n\nVulgarise(flor, judith)\n\nFleeceable(flor) and Radiate(flor, fritz) and forall x (Fleeceable(x) and Radiate(x, fritz) -> Vulgarise(x, judith)) -> therefore Vulgarise(flor, judith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The harv winterize the casey. The harv does not chase the dynah. The harv enlace the casey. The harv does not eat the dynah. The harv is osmotic. The harv horn the dynah. The casey winterize the abraham. The casey is embedded. The casey horn the abraham. The dynah does not chase the harv. The dynah is iridic. The dynah does not visit the casey. The abraham winterize the dynah. The abraham does not eat the casey. The abraham is osmotic. If something is embedded and it winterize the abraham then it horn the dynah. If something winterize the dynah and it enlace the harv then it horn the harv. If something enlace the casey and the casey does not chase the abraham then it horn the abraham. If something winterize the harv and it winterize the abraham then it winterize the casey. If something is embedded then it winterize the casey. If something winterize the abraham then the abraham is embedded. The casey does not visit the dynah.", "logic": "\nWinterize(harv, casey)\nnot Winterize(harv, dynah)\nEnlace(harv, casey)\nnot Enlace(harv, dynah)\nOsmotic(harv)\nHorn(harv, dynah)\nWinterize(casey, abraham)\nEmbedded(casey)\nHorn(casey, abraham)\nnot Winterize(dynah, harv)\nIridic(dynah)\nnot Horn(dynah, casey)\nWinterize(abraham, dynah)\nnot Enlace(abraham, casey)\nOsmotic(abraham)\nforall x (Embedded(x) and Winterize(x, abraham) -> Horn(x, dynah))\nforall x (Winterize(x, dynah) and Enlace(x, harv) -> Horn(x, harv))\nforall x (Enlace(x, casey) and not Winterize(casey, abraham) -> Horn(x, abraham))\nforall x (Winterize(x, harv) and Winterize(x, abraham) -> Winterize(x, casey))\nforall x (Embedded(x) -> Winterize(x, casey))\nforall x (Winterize(x, abraham) -> Embedded(abraham))\n\nnot Horn(casey, dynah)\n\nEmbedded(casey) and Winterize(casey, abraham) and forall x (Embedded(x) and Winterize(x, abraham) -> Horn(x, dynah)) -> therefore Horn(casey, dynah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The marilee mess the rudy. The marilee does not chase the trevar. The marilee mortar the rudy. The marilee does not eat the trevar. The marilee is depilous. The marilee siphon the trevar. The rudy mess the melisa. The rudy is adept. The rudy siphon the melisa. The trevar does not chase the marilee. The trevar is squabby. The trevar does not visit the rudy. The melisa mess the trevar. The melisa does not eat the rudy. The melisa is depilous. If something is adept and it mess the melisa then it siphon the trevar. If something mess the trevar and it mortar the marilee then it siphon the marilee. If something mortar the rudy and the rudy does not chase the melisa then it siphon the melisa. If something mess the marilee and it mess the melisa then it mess the rudy. If something is adept then it mess the rudy. If something mess the melisa then the melisa is adept. The melisa mess the rudy.", "logic": "\nMess(marilee, rudy)\nnot Mess(marilee, trevar)\nMortar(marilee, rudy)\nnot Mortar(marilee, trevar)\nDepilous(marilee)\nSiphon(marilee, trevar)\nMess(rudy, melisa)\nAdept(rudy)\nSiphon(rudy, melisa)\nnot Mess(trevar, marilee)\nSquabby(trevar)\nnot Siphon(trevar, rudy)\nMess(melisa, trevar)\nnot Mortar(melisa, rudy)\nDepilous(melisa)\nforall x (Adept(x) and Mess(x, melisa) -> Siphon(x, trevar))\nforall x (Mess(x, trevar) and Mortar(x, marilee) -> Siphon(x, marilee))\nforall x (Mortar(x, rudy) and not Mess(rudy, melisa) -> Siphon(x, melisa))\nforall x (Mess(x, marilee) and Mess(x, melisa) -> Mess(x, rudy))\nforall x (Adept(x) -> Mess(x, rudy))\nforall x (Mess(x, melisa) -> Adept(melisa))\n\nMess(melisa, rudy)\n\nMess(rudy, melisa) and forall x (Mess(x, melisa) -> Adept(melisa)) -> therefore Adept(melisa) Adept(melisa) and forall x (Adept(x) -> Mess(x, rudy)) -> therefore Mess(melisa, rudy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The debby conspire the dulcea. The debby does not chase the shandy. The debby sour the dulcea. The debby does not eat the shandy. The debby is mirrored. The debby denudate the shandy. The dulcea conspire the ender. The dulcea is reposeful. The dulcea denudate the ender. The shandy does not chase the debby. The shandy is palmlike. The shandy does not visit the dulcea. The ender conspire the shandy. The ender does not eat the dulcea. The ender is mirrored. If something is reposeful and it conspire the ender then it denudate the shandy. If something conspire the shandy and it sour the debby then it denudate the debby. If something sour the dulcea and the dulcea does not chase the ender then it denudate the ender. If something conspire the debby and it conspire the ender then it conspire the dulcea. If something is reposeful then it conspire the dulcea. If something conspire the ender then the ender is reposeful. The ender does not chase the dulcea.", "logic": "\nConspire(debby, dulcea)\nnot Conspire(debby, shandy)\nSour(debby, dulcea)\nnot Sour(debby, shandy)\nMirrored(debby)\nDenudate(debby, shandy)\nConspire(dulcea, ender)\nReposeful(dulcea)\nDenudate(dulcea, ender)\nnot Conspire(shandy, debby)\nPalmlike(shandy)\nnot Denudate(shandy, dulcea)\nConspire(ender, shandy)\nnot Sour(ender, dulcea)\nMirrored(ender)\nforall x (Reposeful(x) and Conspire(x, ender) -> Denudate(x, shandy))\nforall x (Conspire(x, shandy) and Sour(x, debby) -> Denudate(x, debby))\nforall x (Sour(x, dulcea) and not Conspire(dulcea, ender) -> Denudate(x, ender))\nforall x (Conspire(x, debby) and Conspire(x, ender) -> Conspire(x, dulcea))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Conspire(x, dulcea))\nforall x (Conspire(x, ender) -> Reposeful(ender))\n\nnot Conspire(ender, dulcea)\n\nConspire(dulcea, ender) and forall x (Conspire(x, ender) -> Reposeful(ender)) -> therefore Reposeful(ender) Reposeful(ender) and forall x (Reposeful(x) -> Conspire(x, dulcea)) -> therefore Conspire(ender, dulcea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The bridgette oversee the lurlene. The bridgette does not chase the jeffrey. The bridgette actuate the lurlene. The bridgette does not eat the jeffrey. The bridgette is excessive. The bridgette stuff the jeffrey. The lurlene oversee the barb. The lurlene is radiating. The lurlene stuff the barb. The jeffrey does not chase the bridgette. The jeffrey is pleonastic. The jeffrey does not visit the lurlene. The barb oversee the jeffrey. The barb does not eat the lurlene. The barb is excessive. If something is radiating and it oversee the barb then it stuff the jeffrey. If something oversee the jeffrey and it actuate the bridgette then it stuff the bridgette. If something actuate the lurlene and the lurlene does not chase the barb then it stuff the barb. If something oversee the bridgette and it oversee the barb then it oversee the lurlene. If something is radiating then it oversee the lurlene. If something oversee the barb then the barb is radiating. The bridgette does not visit the barb.", "logic": "\nOversee(bridgette, lurlene)\nnot Oversee(bridgette, jeffrey)\nActuate(bridgette, lurlene)\nnot Actuate(bridgette, jeffrey)\nExcessive(bridgette)\nStuff(bridgette, jeffrey)\nOversee(lurlene, barb)\nRadiating(lurlene)\nStuff(lurlene, barb)\nnot Oversee(jeffrey, bridgette)\nPleonastic(jeffrey)\nnot Stuff(jeffrey, lurlene)\nOversee(barb, jeffrey)\nnot Actuate(barb, lurlene)\nExcessive(barb)\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Oversee(x, barb) -> Stuff(x, jeffrey))\nforall x (Oversee(x, jeffrey) and Actuate(x, bridgette) -> Stuff(x, bridgette))\nforall x (Actuate(x, lurlene) and not Oversee(lurlene, barb) -> Stuff(x, barb))\nforall x (Oversee(x, bridgette) and Oversee(x, barb) -> Oversee(x, lurlene))\nforall x (Radiating(x) -> Oversee(x, lurlene))\nforall x (Oversee(x, barb) -> Radiating(barb))\n\nnot Stuff(bridgette, barb)\n\nforall x (Actuate(x, lurlene) and not Oversee(lurlene, barb) -> Stuff(x, barb)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The lonni resize the nichol. The lonni does not chase the stefania. The lonni polish the nichol. The lonni does not eat the stefania. The lonni is serflike. The lonni sponsor the stefania. The nichol resize the susana. The nichol is alabaster. The nichol sponsor the susana. The stefania does not chase the lonni. The stefania is stabilised. The stefania does not visit the nichol. The susana resize the stefania. The susana does not eat the nichol. The susana is serflike. If something is alabaster and it resize the susana then it sponsor the stefania. If something resize the stefania and it polish the lonni then it sponsor the lonni. If something polish the nichol and the nichol does not chase the susana then it sponsor the susana. If something resize the lonni and it resize the susana then it resize the nichol. If something is alabaster then it resize the nichol. If something resize the susana then the susana is alabaster. The stefania sponsor the lonni.", "logic": "\nResize(lonni, nichol)\nnot Resize(lonni, stefania)\nPolish(lonni, nichol)\nnot Polish(lonni, stefania)\nSerflike(lonni)\nSponsor(lonni, stefania)\nResize(nichol, susana)\nAlabaster(nichol)\nSponsor(nichol, susana)\nnot Resize(stefania, lonni)\nStabilised(stefania)\nnot Sponsor(stefania, nichol)\nResize(susana, stefania)\nnot Polish(susana, nichol)\nSerflike(susana)\nforall x (Alabaster(x) and Resize(x, susana) -> Sponsor(x, stefania))\nforall x (Resize(x, stefania) and Polish(x, lonni) -> Sponsor(x, lonni))\nforall x (Polish(x, nichol) and not Resize(nichol, susana) -> Sponsor(x, susana))\nforall x (Resize(x, lonni) and Resize(x, susana) -> Resize(x, nichol))\nforall x (Alabaster(x) -> Resize(x, nichol))\nforall x (Resize(x, susana) -> Alabaster(susana))\n\nSponsor(stefania, lonni)\n\nforall x (Resize(x, stefania) and Polish(x, lonni) -> Sponsor(x, lonni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The kati carburise the johnny. The kati does not chase the marnie. The kati polemicise the johnny. The kati does not eat the marnie. The kati is cornish. The kati contact the marnie. The johnny carburise the queenie. The johnny is oppressed. The johnny contact the queenie. The marnie does not chase the kati. The marnie is tuxedoed. The marnie does not visit the johnny. The queenie carburise the marnie. The queenie does not eat the johnny. The queenie is cornish. If something is oppressed and it carburise the queenie then it contact the marnie. If something carburise the marnie and it polemicise the kati then it contact the kati. If something polemicise the johnny and the johnny does not chase the queenie then it contact the queenie. If something carburise the kati and it carburise the queenie then it carburise the johnny. If something is oppressed then it carburise the johnny. If something carburise the queenie then the queenie is oppressed. The marnie does not visit the queenie.", "logic": "\nCarburise(kati, johnny)\nnot Carburise(kati, marnie)\nPolemicise(kati, johnny)\nnot Polemicise(kati, marnie)\nCornish(kati)\nContact(kati, marnie)\nCarburise(johnny, queenie)\nOppressed(johnny)\nContact(johnny, queenie)\nnot Carburise(marnie, kati)\nTuxedoed(marnie)\nnot Contact(marnie, johnny)\nCarburise(queenie, marnie)\nnot Polemicise(queenie, johnny)\nCornish(queenie)\nforall x (Oppressed(x) and Carburise(x, queenie) -> Contact(x, marnie))\nforall x (Carburise(x, marnie) and Polemicise(x, kati) -> Contact(x, kati))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, johnny) and not Carburise(johnny, queenie) -> Contact(x, queenie))\nforall x (Carburise(x, kati) and Carburise(x, queenie) -> Carburise(x, johnny))\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Carburise(x, johnny))\nforall x (Carburise(x, queenie) -> Oppressed(queenie))\n\nnot Contact(marnie, queenie)\n\nforall x (Polemicise(x, johnny) and not Carburise(johnny, queenie) -> Contact(x, queenie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The susy waggle the ronna. The susy does not chase the brittney. The susy arborize the ronna. The susy does not eat the brittney. The susy is unrouged. The susy exenterate the brittney. The ronna waggle the corliss. The ronna is akin. The ronna exenterate the corliss. The brittney does not chase the susy. The brittney is altricial. The brittney does not visit the ronna. The corliss waggle the brittney. The corliss does not eat the ronna. The corliss is unrouged. If something is akin and it waggle the corliss then it exenterate the brittney. If something waggle the brittney and it arborize the susy then it exenterate the susy. If something arborize the ronna and the ronna does not chase the corliss then it exenterate the corliss. If something waggle the susy and it waggle the corliss then it waggle the ronna. If something is akin then it waggle the ronna. If something waggle the corliss then the corliss is akin. The brittney arborize the ronna.", "logic": "\nWaggle(susy, ronna)\nnot Waggle(susy, brittney)\nArborize(susy, ronna)\nnot Arborize(susy, brittney)\nUnrouged(susy)\nExenterate(susy, brittney)\nWaggle(ronna, corliss)\nAkin(ronna)\nExenterate(ronna, corliss)\nnot Waggle(brittney, susy)\nAltricial(brittney)\nnot Exenterate(brittney, ronna)\nWaggle(corliss, brittney)\nnot Arborize(corliss, ronna)\nUnrouged(corliss)\nforall x (Akin(x) and Waggle(x, corliss) -> Exenterate(x, brittney))\nforall x (Waggle(x, brittney) and Arborize(x, susy) -> Exenterate(x, susy))\nforall x (Arborize(x, ronna) and not Waggle(ronna, corliss) -> Exenterate(x, corliss))\nforall x (Waggle(x, susy) and Waggle(x, corliss) -> Waggle(x, ronna))\nforall x (Akin(x) -> Waggle(x, ronna))\nforall x (Waggle(x, corliss) -> Akin(corliss))\n\nArborize(brittney, ronna)\n\nArborize(brittney, ronna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The selle receipt the gabey. The selle does not chase the katine. The selle ozonise the gabey. The selle does not eat the katine. The selle is unstained. The selle neaten the katine. The gabey receipt the englebart. The gabey is ghostly. The gabey neaten the englebart. The katine does not chase the selle. The katine is full. The katine does not visit the gabey. The englebart receipt the katine. The englebart does not eat the gabey. The englebart is unstained. If something is ghostly and it receipt the englebart then it neaten the katine. If something receipt the katine and it ozonise the selle then it neaten the selle. If something ozonise the gabey and the gabey does not chase the englebart then it neaten the englebart. If something receipt the selle and it receipt the englebart then it receipt the gabey. If something is ghostly then it receipt the gabey. If something receipt the englebart then the englebart is ghostly. The englebart does not eat the englebart.", "logic": "\nReceipt(selle, gabey)\nnot Receipt(selle, katine)\nOzonise(selle, gabey)\nnot Ozonise(selle, katine)\nUnstained(selle)\nNeaten(selle, katine)\nReceipt(gabey, englebart)\nGhostly(gabey)\nNeaten(gabey, englebart)\nnot Receipt(katine, selle)\nFull(katine)\nnot Neaten(katine, gabey)\nReceipt(englebart, katine)\nnot Ozonise(englebart, gabey)\nUnstained(englebart)\nforall x (Ghostly(x) and Receipt(x, englebart) -> Neaten(x, katine))\nforall x (Receipt(x, katine) and Ozonise(x, selle) -> Neaten(x, selle))\nforall x (Ozonise(x, gabey) and not Receipt(gabey, englebart) -> Neaten(x, englebart))\nforall x (Receipt(x, selle) and Receipt(x, englebart) -> Receipt(x, gabey))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Receipt(x, gabey))\nforall x (Receipt(x, englebart) -> Ghostly(englebart))\n\nnot Ozonise(englebart, englebart)\n\nnot Ozonise(englebart, englebart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The pennie fluster the alford. The pennie does not chase the rodina. The pennie sight the alford. The pennie does not eat the rodina. The pennie is bulbed. The pennie nitrify the rodina. The alford fluster the cletus. The alford is graphical. The alford nitrify the cletus. The rodina does not chase the pennie. The rodina is faulty. The rodina does not visit the alford. The cletus fluster the rodina. The cletus does not eat the alford. The cletus is bulbed. If something is graphical and it fluster the cletus then it nitrify the rodina. If something fluster the rodina and it sight the pennie then it nitrify the pennie. If something sight the alford and the alford does not chase the cletus then it nitrify the cletus. If something fluster the pennie and it fluster the cletus then it fluster the alford. If something is graphical then it fluster the alford. If something fluster the cletus then the cletus is graphical. The pennie nitrify the alford.", "logic": "\nFluster(pennie, alford)\nnot Fluster(pennie, rodina)\nSight(pennie, alford)\nnot Sight(pennie, rodina)\nBulbed(pennie)\nNitrify(pennie, rodina)\nFluster(alford, cletus)\nGraphical(alford)\nNitrify(alford, cletus)\nnot Fluster(rodina, pennie)\nFaulty(rodina)\nnot Nitrify(rodina, alford)\nFluster(cletus, rodina)\nnot Sight(cletus, alford)\nBulbed(cletus)\nforall x (Graphical(x) and Fluster(x, cletus) -> Nitrify(x, rodina))\nforall x (Fluster(x, rodina) and Sight(x, pennie) -> Nitrify(x, pennie))\nforall x (Sight(x, alford) and not Fluster(alford, cletus) -> Nitrify(x, cletus))\nforall x (Fluster(x, pennie) and Fluster(x, cletus) -> Fluster(x, alford))\nforall x (Graphical(x) -> Fluster(x, alford))\nforall x (Fluster(x, cletus) -> Graphical(cletus))\n\nNitrify(pennie, alford)\n\nNitrify(pennie, alford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "The francesco is guttural. The francesco does not need the marsiella. The francesco does not visit the isaiah. The isaiah is variolous. The marsiella is paraplegic. The marsiella regularize the francesco. The marsiella roughcast the francesco. If someone regularize the francesco then they do not like the isaiah. If someone braille the isaiah and they need the isaiah then the isaiah regularize the francesco. If someone braille the francesco and the francesco roughcast the marsiella then the francesco is guttural. If someone roughcast the isaiah then the isaiah is hominian. If the isaiah is guttural and the isaiah regularize the francesco then the francesco braille the marsiella. If someone roughcast the francesco and they do not like the isaiah then the francesco is hominian. The isaiah is variolous.", "logic": "\nGuttural(francesco)\nnot Roughcast(francesco, marsiella)\nnot Braille(francesco, isaiah)\nVariolous(isaiah)\nParaplegic(marsiella)\nRegularize(marsiella, francesco)\nRoughcast(marsiella, francesco)\nforall x (Regularize(x, francesco) -> not Regularize(x, isaiah))\nforall x (Braille(x, isaiah) and Roughcast(x, isaiah) -> Regularize(isaiah, francesco))\nforall x (Braille(x, francesco) and Roughcast(francesco, marsiella) -> Guttural(francesco))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, isaiah) -> Hominian(isaiah))\nGuttural(isaiah) and Regularize(isaiah, francesco) -> Braille(francesco, marsiella)\nforall x (Roughcast(x, francesco) and not Regularize(x, isaiah) -> Hominian(francesco))\n\nVariolous(isaiah)\n\ntherefore Variolous(isaiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The harmony is overgrown. The harmony does not need the suzanne. The harmony does not visit the heidie. The heidie is slovenian. The suzanne is mitigative. The suzanne rupture the harmony. The suzanne convene the harmony. If someone rupture the harmony then they do not like the heidie. If someone denitrify the heidie and they need the heidie then the heidie rupture the harmony. If someone denitrify the harmony and the harmony convene the suzanne then the harmony is overgrown. If someone convene the heidie then the heidie is genital. If the heidie is overgrown and the heidie rupture the harmony then the harmony denitrify the suzanne. If someone convene the harmony and they do not like the heidie then the harmony is genital. The suzanne does not like the harmony.", "logic": "\nOvergrown(harmony)\nnot Convene(harmony, suzanne)\nnot Denitrify(harmony, heidie)\nSlovenian(heidie)\nMitigative(suzanne)\nRupture(suzanne, harmony)\nConvene(suzanne, harmony)\nforall x (Rupture(x, harmony) -> not Rupture(x, heidie))\nforall x (Denitrify(x, heidie) and Convene(x, heidie) -> Rupture(heidie, harmony))\nforall x (Denitrify(x, harmony) and Convene(harmony, suzanne) -> Overgrown(harmony))\nforall x (Convene(x, heidie) -> Genital(heidie))\nOvergrown(heidie) and Rupture(heidie, harmony) -> Denitrify(harmony, suzanne)\nforall x (Convene(x, harmony) and not Rupture(x, heidie) -> Genital(harmony))\n\nnot Rupture(suzanne, harmony)\n\ntherefore Rupture(suzanne, harmony)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The kristin is unforced. The kristin does not need the merell. The kristin does not visit the carrissa. The carrissa is incorrect. The merell is audenesque. The merell metabolise the kristin. The merell earth the kristin. If someone metabolise the kristin then they do not like the carrissa. If someone barricade the carrissa and they need the carrissa then the carrissa metabolise the kristin. If someone barricade the kristin and the kristin earth the merell then the kristin is unforced. If someone earth the carrissa then the carrissa is lifeless. If the carrissa is unforced and the carrissa metabolise the kristin then the kristin barricade the merell. If someone earth the kristin and they do not like the carrissa then the kristin is lifeless. The merell does not like the carrissa.", "logic": "\nUnforced(kristin)\nnot Earth(kristin, merell)\nnot Barricade(kristin, carrissa)\nIncorrect(carrissa)\nAudenesque(merell)\nMetabolise(merell, kristin)\nEarth(merell, kristin)\nforall x (Metabolise(x, kristin) -> not Metabolise(x, carrissa))\nforall x (Barricade(x, carrissa) and Earth(x, carrissa) -> Metabolise(carrissa, kristin))\nforall x (Barricade(x, kristin) and Earth(kristin, merell) -> Unforced(kristin))\nforall x (Earth(x, carrissa) -> Lifeless(carrissa))\nUnforced(carrissa) and Metabolise(carrissa, kristin) -> Barricade(kristin, merell)\nforall x (Earth(x, kristin) and not Metabolise(x, carrissa) -> Lifeless(kristin))\n\nnot Metabolise(merell, carrissa)\n\nMetabolise(merell, kristin) and forall x (Metabolise(x, kristin) -> not Metabolise(x, carrissa)) -> therefore not Metabolise(merell, carrissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The helena is unpunctual. The helena does not need the alvera. The helena does not visit the inci. The inci is knightly. The alvera is flash. The alvera filch the helena. The alvera infatuate the helena. If someone filch the helena then they do not like the inci. If someone guzzle the inci and they need the inci then the inci filch the helena. If someone guzzle the helena and the helena infatuate the alvera then the helena is unpunctual. If someone infatuate the inci then the inci is ventricose. If the inci is unpunctual and the inci filch the helena then the helena guzzle the alvera. If someone infatuate the helena and they do not like the inci then the helena is ventricose. The alvera filch the inci.", "logic": "\nUnpunctual(helena)\nnot Infatuate(helena, alvera)\nnot Guzzle(helena, inci)\nKnightly(inci)\nFlash(alvera)\nFilch(alvera, helena)\nInfatuate(alvera, helena)\nforall x (Filch(x, helena) -> not Filch(x, inci))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, inci) and Infatuate(x, inci) -> Filch(inci, helena))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, helena) and Infatuate(helena, alvera) -> Unpunctual(helena))\nforall x (Infatuate(x, inci) -> Ventricose(inci))\nUnpunctual(inci) and Filch(inci, helena) -> Guzzle(helena, alvera)\nforall x (Infatuate(x, helena) and not Filch(x, inci) -> Ventricose(helena))\n\nFilch(alvera, inci)\n\nFilch(alvera, helena) and forall x (Filch(x, helena) -> not Filch(x, inci)) -> therefore not Filch(alvera, inci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The alina is backhanded. The alina does not need the karilynn. The alina does not visit the hedda. The hedda is mini. The karilynn is grassroots. The karilynn pussyfoot the alina. The karilynn shanghai the alina. If someone pussyfoot the alina then they do not like the hedda. If someone associate the hedda and they need the hedda then the hedda pussyfoot the alina. If someone associate the alina and the alina shanghai the karilynn then the alina is backhanded. If someone shanghai the hedda then the hedda is vacuolated. If the hedda is backhanded and the hedda pussyfoot the alina then the alina associate the karilynn. If someone shanghai the alina and they do not like the hedda then the alina is vacuolated. The alina is vacuolated.", "logic": "\nBackhanded(alina)\nnot Shanghai(alina, karilynn)\nnot Associate(alina, hedda)\nMini(hedda)\nGrassroots(karilynn)\nPussyfoot(karilynn, alina)\nShanghai(karilynn, alina)\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, alina) -> not Pussyfoot(x, hedda))\nforall x (Associate(x, hedda) and Shanghai(x, hedda) -> Pussyfoot(hedda, alina))\nforall x (Associate(x, alina) and Shanghai(alina, karilynn) -> Backhanded(alina))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, hedda) -> Vacuolated(hedda))\nBackhanded(hedda) and Pussyfoot(hedda, alina) -> Associate(alina, karilynn)\nforall x (Shanghai(x, alina) and not Pussyfoot(x, hedda) -> Vacuolated(alina))\n\nVacuolated(alina)\n\nPussyfoot(karilynn, alina) and forall x (Pussyfoot(x, alina) -> not Pussyfoot(x, hedda)) -> therefore not Pussyfoot(karilynn, hedda) Shanghai(karilynn, alina) and not Pussyfoot(karilynn, hedda) and forall x (Shanghai(x, alina) and not Pussyfoot(x, hedda) -> Vacuolated(alina)) -> therefore Vacuolated(alina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The freddy is victimized. The freddy does not need the wain. The freddy does not visit the caryn. The caryn is greenish. The wain is coccal. The wain secede the freddy. The wain image the freddy. If someone secede the freddy then they do not like the caryn. If someone realise the caryn and they need the caryn then the caryn secede the freddy. If someone realise the freddy and the freddy image the wain then the freddy is victimized. If someone image the caryn then the caryn is vigilant. If the caryn is victimized and the caryn secede the freddy then the freddy realise the wain. If someone image the freddy and they do not like the caryn then the freddy is vigilant. The freddy is not vigilant.", "logic": "\nVictimized(freddy)\nnot Image(freddy, wain)\nnot Realise(freddy, caryn)\nGreenish(caryn)\nCoccal(wain)\nSecede(wain, freddy)\nImage(wain, freddy)\nforall x (Secede(x, freddy) -> not Secede(x, caryn))\nforall x (Realise(x, caryn) and Image(x, caryn) -> Secede(caryn, freddy))\nforall x (Realise(x, freddy) and Image(freddy, wain) -> Victimized(freddy))\nforall x (Image(x, caryn) -> Vigilant(caryn))\nVictimized(caryn) and Secede(caryn, freddy) -> Realise(freddy, wain)\nforall x (Image(x, freddy) and not Secede(x, caryn) -> Vigilant(freddy))\n\nnot Vigilant(freddy)\n\nSecede(wain, freddy) and forall x (Secede(x, freddy) -> not Secede(x, caryn)) -> therefore not Secede(wain, caryn) Image(wain, freddy) and not Secede(wain, caryn) and forall x (Image(x, freddy) and not Secede(x, caryn) -> Vigilant(freddy)) -> therefore Vigilant(freddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The dorisa is tested. The dorisa does not need the marc. The dorisa does not visit the mercedes. The mercedes is yeastlike. The marc is distaff. The marc weightlift the dorisa. The marc dulcorate the dorisa. If someone weightlift the dorisa then they do not like the mercedes. If someone stargaze the mercedes and they need the mercedes then the mercedes weightlift the dorisa. If someone stargaze the dorisa and the dorisa dulcorate the marc then the dorisa is tested. If someone dulcorate the mercedes then the mercedes is urogenital. If the mercedes is tested and the mercedes weightlift the dorisa then the dorisa stargaze the marc. If someone dulcorate the dorisa and they do not like the mercedes then the dorisa is urogenital. The mercedes does not like the dorisa.", "logic": "\nTested(dorisa)\nnot Dulcorate(dorisa, marc)\nnot Stargaze(dorisa, mercedes)\nYeastlike(mercedes)\nDistaff(marc)\nWeightlift(marc, dorisa)\nDulcorate(marc, dorisa)\nforall x (Weightlift(x, dorisa) -> not Weightlift(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Stargaze(x, mercedes) and Dulcorate(x, mercedes) -> Weightlift(mercedes, dorisa))\nforall x (Stargaze(x, dorisa) and Dulcorate(dorisa, marc) -> Tested(dorisa))\nforall x (Dulcorate(x, mercedes) -> Urogenital(mercedes))\nTested(mercedes) and Weightlift(mercedes, dorisa) -> Stargaze(dorisa, marc)\nforall x (Dulcorate(x, dorisa) and not Weightlift(x, mercedes) -> Urogenital(dorisa))\n\nnot Weightlift(mercedes, dorisa)\n\nforall x (Stargaze(x, mercedes) and Dulcorate(x, mercedes) -> Weightlift(mercedes, dorisa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The teddi is coastal. The teddi does not need the rayshell. The teddi does not visit the stoddard. The stoddard is arrant. The rayshell is graphic. The rayshell bedew the teddi. The rayshell antedate the teddi. If someone bedew the teddi then they do not like the stoddard. If someone refreshen the stoddard and they need the stoddard then the stoddard bedew the teddi. If someone refreshen the teddi and the teddi antedate the rayshell then the teddi is coastal. If someone antedate the stoddard then the stoddard is primal. If the stoddard is coastal and the stoddard bedew the teddi then the teddi refreshen the rayshell. If someone antedate the teddi and they do not like the stoddard then the teddi is primal. The teddi refreshen the rayshell.", "logic": "\nCoastal(teddi)\nnot Antedate(teddi, rayshell)\nnot Refreshen(teddi, stoddard)\nArrant(stoddard)\nGraphic(rayshell)\nBedew(rayshell, teddi)\nAntedate(rayshell, teddi)\nforall x (Bedew(x, teddi) -> not Bedew(x, stoddard))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, stoddard) and Antedate(x, stoddard) -> Bedew(stoddard, teddi))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, teddi) and Antedate(teddi, rayshell) -> Coastal(teddi))\nforall x (Antedate(x, stoddard) -> Primal(stoddard))\nCoastal(stoddard) and Bedew(stoddard, teddi) -> Refreshen(teddi, rayshell)\nforall x (Antedate(x, teddi) and not Bedew(x, stoddard) -> Primal(teddi))\n\nRefreshen(teddi, rayshell)\n\nCoastal(stoddard) and Bedew(stoddard, teddi) -> Refreshen(teddi, rayshell) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The timothy is subduable. The timothy does not need the hildagard. The timothy does not visit the roxanne. The roxanne is famed. The hildagard is fretted. The hildagard concert the timothy. The hildagard exalt the timothy. If someone concert the timothy then they do not like the roxanne. If someone laze the roxanne and they need the roxanne then the roxanne concert the timothy. If someone laze the timothy and the timothy exalt the hildagard then the timothy is subduable. If someone exalt the roxanne then the roxanne is waiting. If the roxanne is subduable and the roxanne concert the timothy then the timothy laze the hildagard. If someone exalt the timothy and they do not like the roxanne then the timothy is waiting. The roxanne is not waiting.", "logic": "\nSubduable(timothy)\nnot Exalt(timothy, hildagard)\nnot Laze(timothy, roxanne)\nFamed(roxanne)\nFretted(hildagard)\nConcert(hildagard, timothy)\nExalt(hildagard, timothy)\nforall x (Concert(x, timothy) -> not Concert(x, roxanne))\nforall x (Laze(x, roxanne) and Exalt(x, roxanne) -> Concert(roxanne, timothy))\nforall x (Laze(x, timothy) and Exalt(timothy, hildagard) -> Subduable(timothy))\nforall x (Exalt(x, roxanne) -> Waiting(roxanne))\nSubduable(roxanne) and Concert(roxanne, timothy) -> Laze(timothy, hildagard)\nforall x (Exalt(x, timothy) and not Concert(x, roxanne) -> Waiting(timothy))\n\nnot Waiting(roxanne)\n\nforall x (Exalt(x, roxanne) -> Waiting(roxanne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The morlee is clattery. The morlee does not need the joshuah. The morlee does not visit the annabal. The annabal is eastside. The joshuah is debonaire. The joshuah foreshow the morlee. The joshuah misadvise the morlee. If someone foreshow the morlee then they do not like the annabal. If someone coarsen the annabal and they need the annabal then the annabal foreshow the morlee. If someone coarsen the morlee and the morlee misadvise the joshuah then the morlee is clattery. If someone misadvise the annabal then the annabal is splenic. If the annabal is clattery and the annabal foreshow the morlee then the morlee coarsen the joshuah. If someone misadvise the morlee and they do not like the annabal then the morlee is splenic. The joshuah is splenic.", "logic": "\nClattery(morlee)\nnot Misadvise(morlee, joshuah)\nnot Coarsen(morlee, annabal)\nEastside(annabal)\nDebonaire(joshuah)\nForeshow(joshuah, morlee)\nMisadvise(joshuah, morlee)\nforall x (Foreshow(x, morlee) -> not Foreshow(x, annabal))\nforall x (Coarsen(x, annabal) and Misadvise(x, annabal) -> Foreshow(annabal, morlee))\nforall x (Coarsen(x, morlee) and Misadvise(morlee, joshuah) -> Clattery(morlee))\nforall x (Misadvise(x, annabal) -> Splenic(annabal))\nClattery(annabal) and Foreshow(annabal, morlee) -> Coarsen(morlee, joshuah)\nforall x (Misadvise(x, morlee) and not Foreshow(x, annabal) -> Splenic(morlee))\n\nSplenic(joshuah)\n\nSplenic(joshuah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The niles is inflexible. The niles does not need the jeralee. The niles does not visit the vivyan. The vivyan is boneless. The jeralee is flighty. The jeralee coinsure the niles. The jeralee intonate the niles. If someone coinsure the niles then they do not like the vivyan. If someone twirl the vivyan and they need the vivyan then the vivyan coinsure the niles. If someone twirl the niles and the niles intonate the jeralee then the niles is inflexible. If someone intonate the vivyan then the vivyan is washy. If the vivyan is inflexible and the vivyan coinsure the niles then the niles twirl the jeralee. If someone intonate the niles and they do not like the vivyan then the niles is washy. The vivyan does not like the vivyan.", "logic": "\nInflexible(niles)\nnot Intonate(niles, jeralee)\nnot Twirl(niles, vivyan)\nBoneless(vivyan)\nFlighty(jeralee)\nCoinsure(jeralee, niles)\nIntonate(jeralee, niles)\nforall x (Coinsure(x, niles) -> not Coinsure(x, vivyan))\nforall x (Twirl(x, vivyan) and Intonate(x, vivyan) -> Coinsure(vivyan, niles))\nforall x (Twirl(x, niles) and Intonate(niles, jeralee) -> Inflexible(niles))\nforall x (Intonate(x, vivyan) -> Washy(vivyan))\nInflexible(vivyan) and Coinsure(vivyan, niles) -> Twirl(niles, jeralee)\nforall x (Intonate(x, niles) and not Coinsure(x, vivyan) -> Washy(niles))\n\nnot Coinsure(vivyan, vivyan)\n\nnot Coinsure(vivyan, vivyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The orelee is befitting. The orelee does not need the virgina. The orelee does not visit the merell. The merell is unchanging. The virgina is multiform. The virgina retry the orelee. The virgina reclassify the orelee. If someone retry the orelee then they do not like the merell. If someone encrust the merell and they need the merell then the merell retry the orelee. If someone encrust the orelee and the orelee reclassify the virgina then the orelee is befitting. If someone reclassify the merell then the merell is breeched. If the merell is befitting and the merell retry the orelee then the orelee encrust the virgina. If someone reclassify the orelee and they do not like the merell then the orelee is breeched. The virgina is blue.", "logic": "\nBefitting(orelee)\nnot Reclassify(orelee, virgina)\nnot Encrust(orelee, merell)\nUnchanging(merell)\nMultiform(virgina)\nRetry(virgina, orelee)\nReclassify(virgina, orelee)\nforall x (Retry(x, orelee) -> not Retry(x, merell))\nforall x (Encrust(x, merell) and Reclassify(x, merell) -> Retry(merell, orelee))\nforall x (Encrust(x, orelee) and Reclassify(orelee, virgina) -> Befitting(orelee))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, merell) -> Breeched(merell))\nBefitting(merell) and Retry(merell, orelee) -> Encrust(orelee, virgina)\nforall x (Reclassify(x, orelee) and not Retry(x, merell) -> Breeched(orelee))\n\nBlue(virgina)\n\nBlue(virgina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The saudra is maniacal. The saudra is packaged. The saudra is vulturous. The saudra is nettled. The saudra roughen the annabell. The dorrie possess the annabell. The dorrie roughen the saudra. The dorrie roughen the annabell. The dorrie airbrush the saudra. The annabell possess the saudra. The annabell is asterismal. The annabell is packaged. The annabell roughen the dorrie. The annabell airbrush the saudra. The annabell airbrush the dorrie. If something is vulturous then it airbrush the saudra. If something possess the dorrie and it airbrush the annabell then it roughen the saudra. If something airbrush the saudra then it airbrush the dorrie. The annabell airbrush the saudra.", "logic": "\nManiacal(saudra)\nPackaged(saudra)\nVulturous(saudra)\nNettled(saudra)\nRoughen(saudra, annabell)\nPossess(dorrie, annabell)\nRoughen(dorrie, saudra)\nRoughen(dorrie, annabell)\nAirbrush(dorrie, saudra)\nPossess(annabell, saudra)\nAsterismal(annabell)\nPackaged(annabell)\nRoughen(annabell, dorrie)\nAirbrush(annabell, saudra)\nAirbrush(annabell, dorrie)\nforall x (Vulturous(x) -> Airbrush(x, saudra))\nforall x (Possess(x, dorrie) and Airbrush(x, annabell) -> Roughen(x, saudra))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, saudra) -> Airbrush(x, dorrie))\n\nAirbrush(annabell, saudra)\n\ntherefore Airbrush(annabell, saudra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The barbette is beaklike. The barbette is spirant. The barbette is danish. The barbette is chichi. The barbette terrorize the sammie. The emery motion the sammie. The emery terrorize the barbette. The emery terrorize the sammie. The emery surpass the barbette. The sammie motion the barbette. The sammie is moist. The sammie is spirant. The sammie terrorize the emery. The sammie surpass the barbette. The sammie surpass the emery. If something is danish then it surpass the barbette. If something motion the emery and it surpass the sammie then it terrorize the barbette. If something surpass the barbette then it surpass the emery. The sammie is not moist.", "logic": "\nBeaklike(barbette)\nSpirant(barbette)\nDanish(barbette)\nChichi(barbette)\nTerrorize(barbette, sammie)\nMotion(emery, sammie)\nTerrorize(emery, barbette)\nTerrorize(emery, sammie)\nSurpass(emery, barbette)\nMotion(sammie, barbette)\nMoist(sammie)\nSpirant(sammie)\nTerrorize(sammie, emery)\nSurpass(sammie, barbette)\nSurpass(sammie, emery)\nforall x (Danish(x) -> Surpass(x, barbette))\nforall x (Motion(x, emery) and Surpass(x, sammie) -> Terrorize(x, barbette))\nforall x (Surpass(x, barbette) -> Surpass(x, emery))\n\nnot Moist(sammie)\n\ntherefore Moist(sammie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The elizabeth is planate. The elizabeth is potbellied. The elizabeth is divalent. The elizabeth is apart. The elizabeth misquote the bernete. The jonathan dope the bernete. The jonathan misquote the elizabeth. The jonathan misquote the bernete. The jonathan preordain the elizabeth. The bernete dope the elizabeth. The bernete is haploid. The bernete is potbellied. The bernete misquote the jonathan. The bernete preordain the elizabeth. The bernete preordain the jonathan. If something is divalent then it preordain the elizabeth. If something dope the jonathan and it preordain the bernete then it misquote the elizabeth. If something preordain the elizabeth then it preordain the jonathan. The jonathan preordain the jonathan.", "logic": "\nPlanate(elizabeth)\nPotbellied(elizabeth)\nDivalent(elizabeth)\nApart(elizabeth)\nMisquote(elizabeth, bernete)\nDope(jonathan, bernete)\nMisquote(jonathan, elizabeth)\nMisquote(jonathan, bernete)\nPreordain(jonathan, elizabeth)\nDope(bernete, elizabeth)\nHaploid(bernete)\nPotbellied(bernete)\nMisquote(bernete, jonathan)\nPreordain(bernete, elizabeth)\nPreordain(bernete, jonathan)\nforall x (Divalent(x) -> Preordain(x, elizabeth))\nforall x (Dope(x, jonathan) and Preordain(x, bernete) -> Misquote(x, elizabeth))\nforall x (Preordain(x, elizabeth) -> Preordain(x, jonathan))\n\nPreordain(jonathan, jonathan)\n\nPreordain(jonathan, elizabeth) and forall x (Preordain(x, elizabeth) -> Preordain(x, jonathan)) -> therefore Preordain(jonathan, jonathan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The abby is yellowish. The abby is athletic. The abby is searching. The abby is italic. The abby outgo the sephira. The krista normalize the sephira. The krista outgo the abby. The krista outgo the sephira. The krista penalize the abby. The sephira normalize the abby. The sephira is welcoming. The sephira is athletic. The sephira outgo the krista. The sephira penalize the abby. The sephira penalize the krista. If something is searching then it penalize the abby. If something normalize the krista and it penalize the sephira then it outgo the abby. If something penalize the abby then it penalize the krista. The abby does not visit the abby.", "logic": "\nYellowish(abby)\nAthletic(abby)\nSearching(abby)\nItalic(abby)\nOutgo(abby, sephira)\nNormalize(krista, sephira)\nOutgo(krista, abby)\nOutgo(krista, sephira)\nPenalize(krista, abby)\nNormalize(sephira, abby)\nWelcoming(sephira)\nAthletic(sephira)\nOutgo(sephira, krista)\nPenalize(sephira, abby)\nPenalize(sephira, krista)\nforall x (Searching(x) -> Penalize(x, abby))\nforall x (Normalize(x, krista) and Penalize(x, sephira) -> Outgo(x, abby))\nforall x (Penalize(x, abby) -> Penalize(x, krista))\n\nnot Penalize(abby, abby)\n\nSearching(abby) and forall x (Searching(x) -> Penalize(x, abby)) -> therefore Penalize(abby, abby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The zita is equal. The zita is irruptive. The zita is perfumed. The zita is hoar. The zita chauffeur the sim. The clifton disclaim the sim. The clifton chauffeur the zita. The clifton chauffeur the sim. The clifton judge the zita. The sim disclaim the zita. The sim is stannic. The sim is irruptive. The sim chauffeur the clifton. The sim judge the zita. The sim judge the clifton. If something is perfumed then it judge the zita. If something disclaim the clifton and it judge the sim then it chauffeur the zita. If something judge the zita then it judge the clifton. The zita judge the clifton.", "logic": "\nEqual(zita)\nIrruptive(zita)\nPerfumed(zita)\nHoar(zita)\nChauffeur(zita, sim)\nDisclaim(clifton, sim)\nChauffeur(clifton, zita)\nChauffeur(clifton, sim)\nJudge(clifton, zita)\nDisclaim(sim, zita)\nStannic(sim)\nIrruptive(sim)\nChauffeur(sim, clifton)\nJudge(sim, zita)\nJudge(sim, clifton)\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Judge(x, zita))\nforall x (Disclaim(x, clifton) and Judge(x, sim) -> Chauffeur(x, zita))\nforall x (Judge(x, zita) -> Judge(x, clifton))\n\nJudge(zita, clifton)\n\nPerfumed(zita) and forall x (Perfumed(x) -> Judge(x, zita)) -> therefore Judge(zita, zita) Judge(zita, zita) and forall x (Judge(x, zita) -> Judge(x, clifton)) -> therefore Judge(zita, clifton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The moira is phony. The moira is neurotic. The moira is federal. The moira is pacific. The moira inscribe the pat. The delcine lapse the pat. The delcine inscribe the moira. The delcine inscribe the pat. The delcine invert the moira. The pat lapse the moira. The pat is spotless. The pat is neurotic. The pat inscribe the delcine. The pat invert the moira. The pat invert the delcine. If something is federal then it invert the moira. If something lapse the delcine and it invert the pat then it inscribe the moira. If something invert the moira then it invert the delcine. The moira does not visit the delcine.", "logic": "\nPhony(moira)\nNeurotic(moira)\nFederal(moira)\nPacific(moira)\nInscribe(moira, pat)\nLapse(delcine, pat)\nInscribe(delcine, moira)\nInscribe(delcine, pat)\nInvert(delcine, moira)\nLapse(pat, moira)\nSpotless(pat)\nNeurotic(pat)\nInscribe(pat, delcine)\nInvert(pat, moira)\nInvert(pat, delcine)\nforall x (Federal(x) -> Invert(x, moira))\nforall x (Lapse(x, delcine) and Invert(x, pat) -> Inscribe(x, moira))\nforall x (Invert(x, moira) -> Invert(x, delcine))\n\nnot Invert(moira, delcine)\n\nFederal(moira) and forall x (Federal(x) -> Invert(x, moira)) -> therefore Invert(moira, moira) Invert(moira, moira) and forall x (Invert(x, moira) -> Invert(x, delcine)) -> therefore Invert(moira, delcine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The alaa is riblike. The alaa is bifoliate. The alaa is morose. The alaa is gutless. The alaa symbolise the marion. The toby tent the marion. The toby symbolise the alaa. The toby symbolise the marion. The toby tarry the alaa. The marion tent the alaa. The marion is still. The marion is bifoliate. The marion symbolise the toby. The marion tarry the alaa. The marion tarry the toby. If something is morose then it tarry the alaa. If something tent the toby and it tarry the marion then it symbolise the alaa. If something tarry the alaa then it tarry the toby. The marion does not like the alaa.", "logic": "\nRiblike(alaa)\nBifoliate(alaa)\nMorose(alaa)\nGutless(alaa)\nSymbolise(alaa, marion)\nTent(toby, marion)\nSymbolise(toby, alaa)\nSymbolise(toby, marion)\nTarry(toby, alaa)\nTent(marion, alaa)\nStill(marion)\nBifoliate(marion)\nSymbolise(marion, toby)\nTarry(marion, alaa)\nTarry(marion, toby)\nforall x (Morose(x) -> Tarry(x, alaa))\nforall x (Tent(x, toby) and Tarry(x, marion) -> Symbolise(x, alaa))\nforall x (Tarry(x, alaa) -> Tarry(x, toby))\n\nnot Symbolise(marion, alaa)\n\nforall x (Tent(x, toby) and Tarry(x, marion) -> Symbolise(x, alaa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The analiese is scaly. The analiese is unbitter. The analiese is pennate. The analiese is illiberal. The analiese profane the ambur. The patsy drink the ambur. The patsy profane the analiese. The patsy profane the ambur. The patsy testify the analiese. The ambur drink the analiese. The ambur is vocal. The ambur is unbitter. The ambur profane the patsy. The ambur testify the analiese. The ambur testify the patsy. If something is pennate then it testify the analiese. If something drink the patsy and it testify the ambur then it profane the analiese. If something testify the analiese then it testify the patsy. The analiese profane the analiese.", "logic": "\nScaly(analiese)\nUnbitter(analiese)\nPennate(analiese)\nIlliberal(analiese)\nProfane(analiese, ambur)\nDrink(patsy, ambur)\nProfane(patsy, analiese)\nProfane(patsy, ambur)\nTestify(patsy, analiese)\nDrink(ambur, analiese)\nVocal(ambur)\nUnbitter(ambur)\nProfane(ambur, patsy)\nTestify(ambur, analiese)\nTestify(ambur, patsy)\nforall x (Pennate(x) -> Testify(x, analiese))\nforall x (Drink(x, patsy) and Testify(x, ambur) -> Profane(x, analiese))\nforall x (Testify(x, analiese) -> Testify(x, patsy))\n\nProfane(analiese, analiese)\n\nforall x (Drink(x, patsy) and Testify(x, ambur) -> Profane(x, analiese)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The madelyn is extensive. The madelyn is paternal. The madelyn is windburned. The madelyn is irish. The madelyn unlock the merlin. The darby demystify the merlin. The darby unlock the madelyn. The darby unlock the merlin. The darby lapidate the madelyn. The merlin demystify the madelyn. The merlin is unlobed. The merlin is paternal. The merlin unlock the darby. The merlin lapidate the madelyn. The merlin lapidate the darby. If something is windburned then it lapidate the madelyn. If something demystify the darby and it lapidate the merlin then it unlock the madelyn. If something lapidate the madelyn then it lapidate the darby. The madelyn does not chase the merlin.", "logic": "\nExtensive(madelyn)\nPaternal(madelyn)\nWindburned(madelyn)\nIrish(madelyn)\nUnlock(madelyn, merlin)\nDemystify(darby, merlin)\nUnlock(darby, madelyn)\nUnlock(darby, merlin)\nLapidate(darby, madelyn)\nDemystify(merlin, madelyn)\nUnlobed(merlin)\nPaternal(merlin)\nUnlock(merlin, darby)\nLapidate(merlin, madelyn)\nLapidate(merlin, darby)\nforall x (Windburned(x) -> Lapidate(x, madelyn))\nforall x (Demystify(x, darby) and Lapidate(x, merlin) -> Unlock(x, madelyn))\nforall x (Lapidate(x, madelyn) -> Lapidate(x, darby))\n\nnot Demystify(madelyn, merlin)\n\nnot Demystify(madelyn, merlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The janey is pencilled. The janey is circadian. The janey is flowery. The janey is prefrontal. The janey prevent the miranda. The wendeline telephone the miranda. The wendeline prevent the janey. The wendeline prevent the miranda. The wendeline cant the janey. The miranda telephone the janey. The miranda is bicorn. The miranda is circadian. The miranda prevent the wendeline. The miranda cant the janey. The miranda cant the wendeline. If something is flowery then it cant the janey. If something telephone the wendeline and it cant the miranda then it prevent the janey. If something cant the janey then it cant the wendeline. The miranda is pencilled.", "logic": "\nPencilled(janey)\nCircadian(janey)\nFlowery(janey)\nPrefrontal(janey)\nPrevent(janey, miranda)\nTelephone(wendeline, miranda)\nPrevent(wendeline, janey)\nPrevent(wendeline, miranda)\nCant(wendeline, janey)\nTelephone(miranda, janey)\nBicorn(miranda)\nCircadian(miranda)\nPrevent(miranda, wendeline)\nCant(miranda, janey)\nCant(miranda, wendeline)\nforall x (Flowery(x) -> Cant(x, janey))\nforall x (Telephone(x, wendeline) and Cant(x, miranda) -> Prevent(x, janey))\nforall x (Cant(x, janey) -> Cant(x, wendeline))\n\nPencilled(miranda)\n\nPencilled(miranda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The lonny is mettlesome. The lonny is copacetic. The lonny is tasty. The lonny is avirulent. The lonny carnalise the fabian. The jacky image the fabian. The jacky carnalise the lonny. The jacky carnalise the fabian. The jacky spelunk the lonny. The fabian image the lonny. The fabian is branchiate. The fabian is copacetic. The fabian carnalise the jacky. The fabian spelunk the lonny. The fabian spelunk the jacky. If something is tasty then it spelunk the lonny. If something image the jacky and it spelunk the fabian then it carnalise the lonny. If something spelunk the lonny then it spelunk the jacky. The lonny does not chase the jacky.", "logic": "\nMettlesome(lonny)\nCopacetic(lonny)\nTasty(lonny)\nAvirulent(lonny)\nCarnalise(lonny, fabian)\nImage(jacky, fabian)\nCarnalise(jacky, lonny)\nCarnalise(jacky, fabian)\nSpelunk(jacky, lonny)\nImage(fabian, lonny)\nBranchiate(fabian)\nCopacetic(fabian)\nCarnalise(fabian, jacky)\nSpelunk(fabian, lonny)\nSpelunk(fabian, jacky)\nforall x (Tasty(x) -> Spelunk(x, lonny))\nforall x (Image(x, jacky) and Spelunk(x, fabian) -> Carnalise(x, lonny))\nforall x (Spelunk(x, lonny) -> Spelunk(x, jacky))\n\nnot Image(lonny, jacky)\n\nnot Image(lonny, jacky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The darci is swaybacked. The darci is canonized. The darci is outermost. The darci is seminude. The darci regroup the peggie. The dona misuse the peggie. The dona regroup the darci. The dona regroup the peggie. The dona swerve the darci. The peggie misuse the darci. The peggie is metric. The peggie is canonized. The peggie regroup the dona. The peggie swerve the darci. The peggie swerve the dona. If something is outermost then it swerve the darci. If something misuse the dona and it swerve the peggie then it regroup the darci. If something swerve the darci then it swerve the dona. The peggie is outermost.", "logic": "\nSwaybacked(darci)\nCanonized(darci)\nOutermost(darci)\nSeminude(darci)\nRegroup(darci, peggie)\nMisuse(dona, peggie)\nRegroup(dona, darci)\nRegroup(dona, peggie)\nSwerve(dona, darci)\nMisuse(peggie, darci)\nMetric(peggie)\nCanonized(peggie)\nRegroup(peggie, dona)\nSwerve(peggie, darci)\nSwerve(peggie, dona)\nforall x (Outermost(x) -> Swerve(x, darci))\nforall x (Misuse(x, dona) and Swerve(x, peggie) -> Regroup(x, darci))\nforall x (Swerve(x, darci) -> Swerve(x, dona))\n\nOutermost(peggie)\n\nOutermost(peggie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The che is licit. The che rebind the mateo. The hyatt trace the che. The hyatt trace the mateo. The mateo trace the hyatt. The mateo trace the weider. The mateo is breathing. The mateo layer the che. The weider trace the che. The weider is forceful. The weider is licit. The weider is breathing. The weider layer the hyatt. The weider layer the mateo. The weider rebind the che. If someone layer the hyatt and they eat the hyatt then the hyatt rebind the weider. If someone rebind the mateo and they visit the weider then they see the che. If someone layer the mateo then the mateo trace the che. If someone layer the che and they eat the che then the che is forceful. If someone trace the weider and the weider layer the che then the che layer the hyatt. If the weider trace the mateo and the weider layer the mateo then the mateo trace the weider. The mateo trace the hyatt.", "logic": "\nLicit(che)\nRebind(che, mateo)\nTrace(hyatt, che)\nTrace(hyatt, mateo)\nTrace(mateo, hyatt)\nTrace(mateo, weider)\nBreathing(mateo)\nLayer(mateo, che)\nTrace(weider, che)\nForceful(weider)\nLicit(weider)\nBreathing(weider)\nLayer(weider, hyatt)\nLayer(weider, mateo)\nRebind(weider, che)\nforall x (Layer(x, hyatt) and Trace(x, hyatt) -> Rebind(hyatt, weider))\nforall x (Rebind(x, mateo) and Rebind(x, weider) -> Layer(x, che))\nforall x (Layer(x, mateo) -> Trace(mateo, che))\nforall x (Layer(x, che) and Trace(x, che) -> Forceful(che))\nforall x (Trace(x, weider) and Layer(weider, che) -> Layer(che, hyatt))\nTrace(weider, mateo) and Layer(weider, mateo) -> Trace(mateo, weider)\n\nTrace(mateo, hyatt)\n\ntherefore Trace(mateo, hyatt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The clemente is arsenious. The clemente elegise the flipper. The cecilia saccharify the clemente. The cecilia saccharify the flipper. The flipper saccharify the cecilia. The flipper saccharify the brandi. The flipper is podgy. The flipper harken the clemente. The brandi saccharify the clemente. The brandi is square. The brandi is arsenious. The brandi is podgy. The brandi harken the cecilia. The brandi harken the flipper. The brandi elegise the clemente. If someone harken the cecilia and they eat the cecilia then the cecilia elegise the brandi. If someone elegise the flipper and they visit the brandi then they see the clemente. If someone harken the flipper then the flipper saccharify the clemente. If someone harken the clemente and they eat the clemente then the clemente is square. If someone saccharify the brandi and the brandi harken the clemente then the clemente harken the cecilia. If the brandi saccharify the flipper and the brandi harken the flipper then the flipper saccharify the brandi. The brandi is not podgy.", "logic": "\nArsenious(clemente)\nElegise(clemente, flipper)\nSaccharify(cecilia, clemente)\nSaccharify(cecilia, flipper)\nSaccharify(flipper, cecilia)\nSaccharify(flipper, brandi)\nPodgy(flipper)\nHarken(flipper, clemente)\nSaccharify(brandi, clemente)\nSquare(brandi)\nArsenious(brandi)\nPodgy(brandi)\nHarken(brandi, cecilia)\nHarken(brandi, flipper)\nElegise(brandi, clemente)\nforall x (Harken(x, cecilia) and Saccharify(x, cecilia) -> Elegise(cecilia, brandi))\nforall x (Elegise(x, flipper) and Elegise(x, brandi) -> Harken(x, clemente))\nforall x (Harken(x, flipper) -> Saccharify(flipper, clemente))\nforall x (Harken(x, clemente) and Saccharify(x, clemente) -> Square(clemente))\nforall x (Saccharify(x, brandi) and Harken(brandi, clemente) -> Harken(clemente, cecilia))\nSaccharify(brandi, flipper) and Harken(brandi, flipper) -> Saccharify(flipper, brandi)\n\nnot Podgy(brandi)\n\ntherefore Podgy(brandi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The hogan is tinny. The hogan impute the jemmie. The prasad legitimate the hogan. The prasad legitimate the jemmie. The jemmie legitimate the prasad. The jemmie legitimate the willow. The jemmie is clonic. The jemmie query the hogan. The willow legitimate the hogan. The willow is apologetic. The willow is tinny. The willow is clonic. The willow query the prasad. The willow query the jemmie. The willow impute the hogan. If someone query the prasad and they eat the prasad then the prasad impute the willow. If someone impute the jemmie and they visit the willow then they see the hogan. If someone query the jemmie then the jemmie legitimate the hogan. If someone query the hogan and they eat the hogan then the hogan is apologetic. If someone legitimate the willow and the willow query the hogan then the hogan query the prasad. If the willow legitimate the jemmie and the willow query the jemmie then the jemmie legitimate the willow. The jemmie legitimate the hogan.", "logic": "\nTinny(hogan)\nImpute(hogan, jemmie)\nLegitimate(prasad, hogan)\nLegitimate(prasad, jemmie)\nLegitimate(jemmie, prasad)\nLegitimate(jemmie, willow)\nClonic(jemmie)\nQuery(jemmie, hogan)\nLegitimate(willow, hogan)\nApologetic(willow)\nTinny(willow)\nClonic(willow)\nQuery(willow, prasad)\nQuery(willow, jemmie)\nImpute(willow, hogan)\nforall x (Query(x, prasad) and Legitimate(x, prasad) -> Impute(prasad, willow))\nforall x (Impute(x, jemmie) and Impute(x, willow) -> Query(x, hogan))\nforall x (Query(x, jemmie) -> Legitimate(jemmie, hogan))\nforall x (Query(x, hogan) and Legitimate(x, hogan) -> Apologetic(hogan))\nforall x (Legitimate(x, willow) and Query(willow, hogan) -> Query(hogan, prasad))\nLegitimate(willow, jemmie) and Query(willow, jemmie) -> Legitimate(jemmie, willow)\n\nLegitimate(jemmie, hogan)\n\nQuery(willow, jemmie) and forall x (Query(x, jemmie) -> Legitimate(jemmie, hogan)) -> therefore Legitimate(jemmie, hogan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The quincey is frolicsome. The quincey preen the clerissa. The jerrilyn overcharge the quincey. The jerrilyn overcharge the clerissa. The clerissa overcharge the jerrilyn. The clerissa overcharge the timmie. The clerissa is copular. The clerissa pouch the quincey. The timmie overcharge the quincey. The timmie is debasing. The timmie is frolicsome. The timmie is copular. The timmie pouch the jerrilyn. The timmie pouch the clerissa. The timmie preen the quincey. If someone pouch the jerrilyn and they eat the jerrilyn then the jerrilyn preen the timmie. If someone preen the clerissa and they visit the timmie then they see the quincey. If someone pouch the clerissa then the clerissa overcharge the quincey. If someone pouch the quincey and they eat the quincey then the quincey is debasing. If someone overcharge the timmie and the timmie pouch the quincey then the quincey pouch the jerrilyn. If the timmie overcharge the clerissa and the timmie pouch the clerissa then the clerissa overcharge the timmie. The clerissa does not eat the quincey.", "logic": "\nFrolicsome(quincey)\nPreen(quincey, clerissa)\nOvercharge(jerrilyn, quincey)\nOvercharge(jerrilyn, clerissa)\nOvercharge(clerissa, jerrilyn)\nOvercharge(clerissa, timmie)\nCopular(clerissa)\nPouch(clerissa, quincey)\nOvercharge(timmie, quincey)\nDebasing(timmie)\nFrolicsome(timmie)\nCopular(timmie)\nPouch(timmie, jerrilyn)\nPouch(timmie, clerissa)\nPreen(timmie, quincey)\nforall x (Pouch(x, jerrilyn) and Overcharge(x, jerrilyn) -> Preen(jerrilyn, timmie))\nforall x (Preen(x, clerissa) and Preen(x, timmie) -> Pouch(x, quincey))\nforall x (Pouch(x, clerissa) -> Overcharge(clerissa, quincey))\nforall x (Pouch(x, quincey) and Overcharge(x, quincey) -> Debasing(quincey))\nforall x (Overcharge(x, timmie) and Pouch(timmie, quincey) -> Pouch(quincey, jerrilyn))\nOvercharge(timmie, clerissa) and Pouch(timmie, clerissa) -> Overcharge(clerissa, timmie)\n\nnot Overcharge(clerissa, quincey)\n\nPouch(timmie, clerissa) and forall x (Pouch(x, clerissa) -> Overcharge(clerissa, quincey)) -> therefore Overcharge(clerissa, quincey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The gianna is epic. The gianna subtilise the marleen. The rheba jackknife the gianna. The rheba jackknife the marleen. The marleen jackknife the rheba. The marleen jackknife the salmon. The marleen is numbing. The marleen grit the gianna. The salmon jackknife the gianna. The salmon is port. The salmon is epic. The salmon is numbing. The salmon grit the rheba. The salmon grit the marleen. The salmon subtilise the gianna. If someone grit the rheba and they eat the rheba then the rheba subtilise the salmon. If someone subtilise the marleen and they visit the salmon then they see the gianna. If someone grit the marleen then the marleen jackknife the gianna. If someone grit the gianna and they eat the gianna then the gianna is port. If someone jackknife the salmon and the salmon grit the gianna then the gianna grit the rheba. If the salmon jackknife the marleen and the salmon grit the marleen then the marleen jackknife the salmon. The gianna is port.", "logic": "\nEpic(gianna)\nSubtilise(gianna, marleen)\nJackknife(rheba, gianna)\nJackknife(rheba, marleen)\nJackknife(marleen, rheba)\nJackknife(marleen, salmon)\nNumbing(marleen)\nGrit(marleen, gianna)\nJackknife(salmon, gianna)\nPort(salmon)\nEpic(salmon)\nNumbing(salmon)\nGrit(salmon, rheba)\nGrit(salmon, marleen)\nSubtilise(salmon, gianna)\nforall x (Grit(x, rheba) and Jackknife(x, rheba) -> Subtilise(rheba, salmon))\nforall x (Subtilise(x, marleen) and Subtilise(x, salmon) -> Grit(x, gianna))\nforall x (Grit(x, marleen) -> Jackknife(marleen, gianna))\nforall x (Grit(x, gianna) and Jackknife(x, gianna) -> Port(gianna))\nforall x (Jackknife(x, salmon) and Grit(salmon, gianna) -> Grit(gianna, rheba))\nJackknife(salmon, marleen) and Grit(salmon, marleen) -> Jackknife(marleen, salmon)\n\nPort(gianna)\n\nGrit(salmon, marleen) and forall x (Grit(x, marleen) -> Jackknife(marleen, gianna)) -> therefore Jackknife(marleen, gianna) Grit(marleen, gianna) and Jackknife(marleen, gianna) and forall x (Grit(x, gianna) and Jackknife(x, gianna) -> Port(gianna)) -> therefore Port(gianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The licha is laotian. The licha negotiate the geo. The harriett flake the licha. The harriett flake the geo. The geo flake the harriett. The geo flake the hewet. The geo is tannic. The geo liquidate the licha. The hewet flake the licha. The hewet is underfed. The hewet is laotian. The hewet is tannic. The hewet liquidate the harriett. The hewet liquidate the geo. The hewet negotiate the licha. If someone liquidate the harriett and they eat the harriett then the harriett negotiate the hewet. If someone negotiate the geo and they visit the hewet then they see the licha. If someone liquidate the geo then the geo flake the licha. If someone liquidate the licha and they eat the licha then the licha is underfed. If someone flake the hewet and the hewet liquidate the licha then the licha liquidate the harriett. If the hewet flake the geo and the hewet liquidate the geo then the geo flake the hewet. The licha is not underfed.", "logic": "\nLaotian(licha)\nNegotiate(licha, geo)\nFlake(harriett, licha)\nFlake(harriett, geo)\nFlake(geo, harriett)\nFlake(geo, hewet)\nTannic(geo)\nLiquidate(geo, licha)\nFlake(hewet, licha)\nUnderfed(hewet)\nLaotian(hewet)\nTannic(hewet)\nLiquidate(hewet, harriett)\nLiquidate(hewet, geo)\nNegotiate(hewet, licha)\nforall x (Liquidate(x, harriett) and Flake(x, harriett) -> Negotiate(harriett, hewet))\nforall x (Negotiate(x, geo) and Negotiate(x, hewet) -> Liquidate(x, licha))\nforall x (Liquidate(x, geo) -> Flake(geo, licha))\nforall x (Liquidate(x, licha) and Flake(x, licha) -> Underfed(licha))\nforall x (Flake(x, hewet) and Liquidate(hewet, licha) -> Liquidate(licha, harriett))\nFlake(hewet, geo) and Liquidate(hewet, geo) -> Flake(geo, hewet)\n\nnot Underfed(licha)\n\nLiquidate(hewet, geo) and forall x (Liquidate(x, geo) -> Flake(geo, licha)) -> therefore Flake(geo, licha) Liquidate(geo, licha) and Flake(geo, licha) and forall x (Liquidate(x, licha) and Flake(x, licha) -> Underfed(licha)) -> therefore Underfed(licha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The barri is nethermost. The barri impair the heddi. The mugsy understock the barri. The mugsy understock the heddi. The heddi understock the mugsy. The heddi understock the alta. The heddi is nosy. The heddi bite the barri. The alta understock the barri. The alta is shortish. The alta is nethermost. The alta is nosy. The alta bite the mugsy. The alta bite the heddi. The alta impair the barri. If someone bite the mugsy and they eat the mugsy then the mugsy impair the alta. If someone impair the heddi and they visit the alta then they see the barri. If someone bite the heddi then the heddi understock the barri. If someone bite the barri and they eat the barri then the barri is shortish. If someone understock the alta and the alta bite the barri then the barri bite the mugsy. If the alta understock the heddi and the alta bite the heddi then the heddi understock the alta. The mugsy does not visit the alta.", "logic": "\nNethermost(barri)\nImpair(barri, heddi)\nUnderstock(mugsy, barri)\nUnderstock(mugsy, heddi)\nUnderstock(heddi, mugsy)\nUnderstock(heddi, alta)\nNosy(heddi)\nBite(heddi, barri)\nUnderstock(alta, barri)\nShortish(alta)\nNethermost(alta)\nNosy(alta)\nBite(alta, mugsy)\nBite(alta, heddi)\nImpair(alta, barri)\nforall x (Bite(x, mugsy) and Understock(x, mugsy) -> Impair(mugsy, alta))\nforall x (Impair(x, heddi) and Impair(x, alta) -> Bite(x, barri))\nforall x (Bite(x, heddi) -> Understock(heddi, barri))\nforall x (Bite(x, barri) and Understock(x, barri) -> Shortish(barri))\nforall x (Understock(x, alta) and Bite(alta, barri) -> Bite(barri, mugsy))\nUnderstock(alta, heddi) and Bite(alta, heddi) -> Understock(heddi, alta)\n\nnot Impair(mugsy, alta)\n\nforall x (Bite(x, mugsy) and Understock(x, mugsy) -> Impair(mugsy, alta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The esteban is afferent. The esteban vaporise the ophelia. The peggy rescale the esteban. The peggy rescale the ophelia. The ophelia rescale the peggy. The ophelia rescale the callie. The ophelia is stinging. The ophelia cite the esteban. The callie rescale the esteban. The callie is reformist. The callie is afferent. The callie is stinging. The callie cite the peggy. The callie cite the ophelia. The callie vaporise the esteban. If someone cite the peggy and they eat the peggy then the peggy vaporise the callie. If someone vaporise the ophelia and they visit the callie then they see the esteban. If someone cite the ophelia then the ophelia rescale the esteban. If someone cite the esteban and they eat the esteban then the esteban is reformist. If someone rescale the callie and the callie cite the esteban then the esteban cite the peggy. If the callie rescale the ophelia and the callie cite the ophelia then the ophelia rescale the callie. The callie cite the esteban.", "logic": "\nAfferent(esteban)\nVaporise(esteban, ophelia)\nRescale(peggy, esteban)\nRescale(peggy, ophelia)\nRescale(ophelia, peggy)\nRescale(ophelia, callie)\nStinging(ophelia)\nCite(ophelia, esteban)\nRescale(callie, esteban)\nReformist(callie)\nAfferent(callie)\nStinging(callie)\nCite(callie, peggy)\nCite(callie, ophelia)\nVaporise(callie, esteban)\nforall x (Cite(x, peggy) and Rescale(x, peggy) -> Vaporise(peggy, callie))\nforall x (Vaporise(x, ophelia) and Vaporise(x, callie) -> Cite(x, esteban))\nforall x (Cite(x, ophelia) -> Rescale(ophelia, esteban))\nforall x (Cite(x, esteban) and Rescale(x, esteban) -> Reformist(esteban))\nforall x (Rescale(x, callie) and Cite(callie, esteban) -> Cite(esteban, peggy))\nRescale(callie, ophelia) and Cite(callie, ophelia) -> Rescale(ophelia, callie)\n\nCite(callie, esteban)\n\nforall x (Vaporise(x, ophelia) and Vaporise(x, callie) -> Cite(x, esteban)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The nelia is seminal. The nelia fizz the rock. The malynda outsmart the nelia. The malynda outsmart the rock. The rock outsmart the malynda. The rock outsmart the cacilie. The rock is lustful. The rock restrain the nelia. The cacilie outsmart the nelia. The cacilie is crass. The cacilie is seminal. The cacilie is lustful. The cacilie restrain the malynda. The cacilie restrain the rock. The cacilie fizz the nelia. If someone restrain the malynda and they eat the malynda then the malynda fizz the cacilie. If someone fizz the rock and they visit the cacilie then they see the nelia. If someone restrain the rock then the rock outsmart the nelia. If someone restrain the nelia and they eat the nelia then the nelia is crass. If someone outsmart the cacilie and the cacilie restrain the nelia then the nelia restrain the malynda. If the cacilie outsmart the rock and the cacilie restrain the rock then the rock outsmart the cacilie. The nelia does not see the malynda.", "logic": "\nSeminal(nelia)\nFizz(nelia, rock)\nOutsmart(malynda, nelia)\nOutsmart(malynda, rock)\nOutsmart(rock, malynda)\nOutsmart(rock, cacilie)\nLustful(rock)\nRestrain(rock, nelia)\nOutsmart(cacilie, nelia)\nCrass(cacilie)\nSeminal(cacilie)\nLustful(cacilie)\nRestrain(cacilie, malynda)\nRestrain(cacilie, rock)\nFizz(cacilie, nelia)\nforall x (Restrain(x, malynda) and Outsmart(x, malynda) -> Fizz(malynda, cacilie))\nforall x (Fizz(x, rock) and Fizz(x, cacilie) -> Restrain(x, nelia))\nforall x (Restrain(x, rock) -> Outsmart(rock, nelia))\nforall x (Restrain(x, nelia) and Outsmart(x, nelia) -> Crass(nelia))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, cacilie) and Restrain(cacilie, nelia) -> Restrain(nelia, malynda))\nOutsmart(cacilie, rock) and Restrain(cacilie, rock) -> Outsmart(rock, cacilie)\n\nnot Restrain(nelia, malynda)\n\nforall x (Outsmart(x, cacilie) and Restrain(cacilie, nelia) -> Restrain(nelia, malynda)) <- forall x (Fizz(x, rock) and Fizz(x, cacilie) -> Restrain(x, nelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The garret is leavened. The garret copper the tiffy. The janot overcloud the garret. The janot overcloud the tiffy. The tiffy overcloud the janot. The tiffy overcloud the rozamond. The tiffy is nethermost. The tiffy dulcify the garret. The rozamond overcloud the garret. The rozamond is aerial. The rozamond is leavened. The rozamond is nethermost. The rozamond dulcify the janot. The rozamond dulcify the tiffy. The rozamond copper the garret. If someone dulcify the janot and they eat the janot then the janot copper the rozamond. If someone copper the tiffy and they visit the rozamond then they see the garret. If someone dulcify the tiffy then the tiffy overcloud the garret. If someone dulcify the garret and they eat the garret then the garret is aerial. If someone overcloud the rozamond and the rozamond dulcify the garret then the garret dulcify the janot. If the rozamond overcloud the tiffy and the rozamond dulcify the tiffy then the tiffy overcloud the rozamond. The garret overcloud the garret.", "logic": "\nLeavened(garret)\nCopper(garret, tiffy)\nOvercloud(janot, garret)\nOvercloud(janot, tiffy)\nOvercloud(tiffy, janot)\nOvercloud(tiffy, rozamond)\nNethermost(tiffy)\nDulcify(tiffy, garret)\nOvercloud(rozamond, garret)\nAerial(rozamond)\nLeavened(rozamond)\nNethermost(rozamond)\nDulcify(rozamond, janot)\nDulcify(rozamond, tiffy)\nCopper(rozamond, garret)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, janot) and Overcloud(x, janot) -> Copper(janot, rozamond))\nforall x (Copper(x, tiffy) and Copper(x, rozamond) -> Dulcify(x, garret))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, tiffy) -> Overcloud(tiffy, garret))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, garret) and Overcloud(x, garret) -> Aerial(garret))\nforall x (Overcloud(x, rozamond) and Dulcify(rozamond, garret) -> Dulcify(garret, janot))\nOvercloud(rozamond, tiffy) and Dulcify(rozamond, tiffy) -> Overcloud(tiffy, rozamond)\n\nOvercloud(garret, garret)\n\nOvercloud(garret, garret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The cynthy is amused. The cynthy uncork the win. The fredric resmudge the cynthy. The fredric resmudge the win. The win resmudge the fredric. The win resmudge the gray. The win is invariable. The win bedizen the cynthy. The gray resmudge the cynthy. The gray is processed. The gray is amused. The gray is invariable. The gray bedizen the fredric. The gray bedizen the win. The gray uncork the cynthy. If someone bedizen the fredric and they eat the fredric then the fredric uncork the gray. If someone uncork the win and they visit the gray then they see the cynthy. If someone bedizen the win then the win resmudge the cynthy. If someone bedizen the cynthy and they eat the cynthy then the cynthy is processed. If someone resmudge the gray and the gray bedizen the cynthy then the cynthy bedizen the fredric. If the gray resmudge the win and the gray bedizen the win then the win resmudge the gray. The cynthy does not eat the fredric.", "logic": "\nAmused(cynthy)\nUncork(cynthy, win)\nResmudge(fredric, cynthy)\nResmudge(fredric, win)\nResmudge(win, fredric)\nResmudge(win, gray)\nInvariable(win)\nBedizen(win, cynthy)\nResmudge(gray, cynthy)\nProcessed(gray)\nAmused(gray)\nInvariable(gray)\nBedizen(gray, fredric)\nBedizen(gray, win)\nUncork(gray, cynthy)\nforall x (Bedizen(x, fredric) and Resmudge(x, fredric) -> Uncork(fredric, gray))\nforall x (Uncork(x, win) and Uncork(x, gray) -> Bedizen(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Bedizen(x, win) -> Resmudge(win, cynthy))\nforall x (Bedizen(x, cynthy) and Resmudge(x, cynthy) -> Processed(cynthy))\nforall x (Resmudge(x, gray) and Bedizen(gray, cynthy) -> Bedizen(cynthy, fredric))\nResmudge(gray, win) and Bedizen(gray, win) -> Resmudge(win, gray)\n\nnot Resmudge(cynthy, fredric)\n\nnot Resmudge(cynthy, fredric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "The christean is incarnate. The christean geld the danit. The eustace overfly the christean. The eustace overfly the danit. The danit overfly the eustace. The danit overfly the douglas. The danit is maverick. The danit digest the christean. The douglas overfly the christean. The douglas is ghanese. The douglas is incarnate. The douglas is maverick. The douglas digest the eustace. The douglas digest the danit. The douglas geld the christean. If someone digest the eustace and they eat the eustace then the eustace geld the douglas. If someone geld the danit and they visit the douglas then they see the christean. If someone digest the danit then the danit overfly the christean. If someone digest the christean and they eat the christean then the christean is ghanese. If someone overfly the douglas and the douglas digest the christean then the christean digest the eustace. If the douglas overfly the danit and the douglas digest the danit then the danit overfly the douglas. The eustace is ghanese.", "logic": "\nIncarnate(christean)\nGeld(christean, danit)\nOverfly(eustace, christean)\nOverfly(eustace, danit)\nOverfly(danit, eustace)\nOverfly(danit, douglas)\nMaverick(danit)\nDigest(danit, christean)\nOverfly(douglas, christean)\nGhanese(douglas)\nIncarnate(douglas)\nMaverick(douglas)\nDigest(douglas, eustace)\nDigest(douglas, danit)\nGeld(douglas, christean)\nforall x (Digest(x, eustace) and Overfly(x, eustace) -> Geld(eustace, douglas))\nforall x (Geld(x, danit) and Geld(x, douglas) -> Digest(x, christean))\nforall x (Digest(x, danit) -> Overfly(danit, christean))\nforall x (Digest(x, christean) and Overfly(x, christean) -> Ghanese(christean))\nforall x (Overfly(x, douglas) and Digest(douglas, christean) -> Digest(christean, eustace))\nOverfly(douglas, danit) and Digest(douglas, danit) -> Overfly(danit, douglas)\n\nGhanese(eustace)\n\nGhanese(eustace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1001"} {"premises": "Loraine is buzzing. Lorrin is orbital. Laurianne is syphilitic. All syphilitic, buzzing things are acetous. If Laurianne is syphilitic then Laurianne is buzzing. Lorrin is orbital.", "logic": "\nBuzzing(loraine)\nOrbital(lorrin)\nSyphilitic(laurianne)\nforall x (Syphilitic(x) and Buzzing(x) -> Acetous(x))\nSyphilitic(laurianne) -> Buzzing(laurianne)\n\nOrbital(lorrin)\n\ntherefore Orbital(lorrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Liorah is diarrhoeic. Morrie is amharic. Aline is mozartean. All mozartean, diarrhoeic things are isopteran. If Aline is mozartean then Aline is diarrhoeic. Aline is not mozartean.", "logic": "\nDiarrhoeic(liorah)\nAmharic(morrie)\nMozartean(aline)\nforall x (Mozartean(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Isopteran(x))\nMozartean(aline) -> Diarrhoeic(aline)\n\nnot Mozartean(aline)\n\ntherefore Mozartean(aline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Yehudi is weird. Jennie is tropical. Windy is chartreuse. All chartreuse, weird things are shopsoiled. If Windy is chartreuse then Windy is weird. Windy is weird.", "logic": "\nWeird(yehudi)\nTropical(jennie)\nChartreuse(windy)\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) and Weird(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nChartreuse(windy) -> Weird(windy)\n\nWeird(windy)\n\nChartreuse(windy) and Chartreuse(windy) -> Weird(windy) -> therefore Weird(windy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Laina is muzzy. Catrina is starboard. Cicely is hypnogogic. All hypnogogic, muzzy things are clonic. If Cicely is hypnogogic then Cicely is muzzy. Cicely is not muzzy.", "logic": "\nMuzzy(laina)\nStarboard(catrina)\nHypnogogic(cicely)\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Clonic(x))\nHypnogogic(cicely) -> Muzzy(cicely)\n\nnot Muzzy(cicely)\n\nHypnogogic(cicely) and Hypnogogic(cicely) -> Muzzy(cicely) -> therefore Muzzy(cicely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Tawnya is razorback. Dedra is saxon. Lyda is hebraical. All hebraical, razorback things are isolable. If Lyda is hebraical then Lyda is razorback. Lyda is isolable.", "logic": "\nRazorback(tawnya)\nSaxon(dedra)\nHebraical(lyda)\nforall x (Hebraical(x) and Razorback(x) -> Isolable(x))\nHebraical(lyda) -> Razorback(lyda)\n\nIsolable(lyda)\n\nHebraical(lyda) and Hebraical(lyda) -> Razorback(lyda) -> therefore Razorback(lyda) Hebraical(lyda) and Razorback(lyda) and forall x (Hebraical(x) and Razorback(x) -> Isolable(x)) -> therefore Isolable(lyda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Jerri is magnetized. Flore is cercarial. Mallory is belittled. All belittled, magnetized things are rotund. If Mallory is belittled then Mallory is magnetized. Mallory is not rotund.", "logic": "\nMagnetized(jerri)\nCercarial(flore)\nBelittled(mallory)\nforall x (Belittled(x) and Magnetized(x) -> Rotund(x))\nBelittled(mallory) -> Magnetized(mallory)\n\nnot Rotund(mallory)\n\nBelittled(mallory) and Belittled(mallory) -> Magnetized(mallory) -> therefore Magnetized(mallory) Belittled(mallory) and Magnetized(mallory) and forall x (Belittled(x) and Magnetized(x) -> Rotund(x)) -> therefore Rotund(mallory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Franciska is jumbled. Welch is tracked. Rocky is squarish. All squarish, jumbled things are hearable. If Rocky is squarish then Rocky is jumbled. Welch is not hearable.", "logic": "\nJumbled(franciska)\nTracked(welch)\nSquarish(rocky)\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Jumbled(x) -> Hearable(x))\nSquarish(rocky) -> Jumbled(rocky)\n\nnot Hearable(welch)\n\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Jumbled(x) -> Hearable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Moll is pacifist. Ardra is exquisite. Marilyn is violable. All violable, pacifist things are catapultic. If Marilyn is violable then Marilyn is pacifist. Moll is catapultic.", "logic": "\nPacifist(moll)\nExquisite(ardra)\nViolable(marilyn)\nforall x (Violable(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Catapultic(x))\nViolable(marilyn) -> Pacifist(marilyn)\n\nCatapultic(moll)\n\nforall x (Violable(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Catapultic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Neron is clitoral. Kevin is inlaid. Leorah is reconciled. All reconciled, clitoral things are haired. If Leorah is reconciled then Leorah is clitoral. Leorah is not inlaid.", "logic": "\nClitoral(neron)\nInlaid(kevin)\nReconciled(leorah)\nforall x (Reconciled(x) and Clitoral(x) -> Haired(x))\nReconciled(leorah) -> Clitoral(leorah)\n\nnot Inlaid(leorah)\n\nnot Inlaid(leorah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Sheff is homostyled. Prudence is incipient. Thomas is ungrateful. All ungrateful, homostyled things are strung. If Thomas is ungrateful then Thomas is homostyled. Prudence is ungrateful.", "logic": "\nHomostyled(sheff)\nIncipient(prudence)\nUngrateful(thomas)\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) and Homostyled(x) -> Strung(x))\nUngrateful(thomas) -> Homostyled(thomas)\n\nUngrateful(prudence)\n\nUngrateful(prudence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Lisabeth is grievous. Tadd is orangish. Kristien is inexpiable. All inexpiable, grievous things are achromatic. If Kristien is inexpiable then Kristien is grievous. Lisabeth is not inexpiable.", "logic": "\nGrievous(lisabeth)\nOrangish(tadd)\nInexpiable(kristien)\nforall x (Inexpiable(x) and Grievous(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nInexpiable(kristien) -> Grievous(kristien)\n\nnot Inexpiable(lisabeth)\n\nnot Inexpiable(lisabeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Gypsy is faveolate. Dimitry is sheepish. Maria is bulbous. All bulbous, faveolate things are unseen. If Maria is bulbous then Maria is faveolate. Maria is red.", "logic": "\nFaveolate(gypsy)\nSheepish(dimitry)\nBulbous(maria)\nforall x (Bulbous(x) and Faveolate(x) -> Unseen(x))\nBulbous(maria) -> Faveolate(maria)\n\nRed(maria)\n\nRed(maria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Berrie is twinkly. Berrie is selected. Berrie is untrue. Berrie is not boundless. Berrie is sure. Jordain is lawful. Jordain is not selected. Jordain is boundless. Querida is twinkly. Querida is selected. Querida is untrue. Querida is boundless. If someone is boundless then they are twinkly. If Jordain is not untrue then Jordain is boundless. If Jordain is twinkly then Jordain is deadened. If someone is lawful and boundless then they are deadened. If someone is twinkly and not boundless then they are deadened. If someone is deadened then they are lawful. All untrue, deadened people are lawful. If someone is deadened and not lawful then they are sure. Querida is twinkly.", "logic": "\nTwinkly(berrie)\nSelected(berrie)\nUntrue(berrie)\nnot Boundless(berrie)\nSure(berrie)\nLawful(jordain)\nnot Selected(jordain)\nBoundless(jordain)\nTwinkly(querida)\nSelected(querida)\nUntrue(querida)\nBoundless(querida)\nforall x (Boundless(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nnot Untrue(jordain) -> Boundless(jordain)\nTwinkly(jordain) -> Deadened(jordain)\nforall x (Lawful(x) and Boundless(x) -> Deadened(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) and not Boundless(x) -> Deadened(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) -> Lawful(x))\nforall x (Untrue(x) and Deadened(x) -> Lawful(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) and not Lawful(x) -> Sure(x))\n\nTwinkly(querida)\n\ntherefore Twinkly(querida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Elvira is outside. Elvira is roughhewn. Elvira is erasable. Elvira is not desired. Elvira is screaky. Marina is scurvy. Marina is not roughhewn. Marina is desired. Puff is outside. Puff is roughhewn. Puff is erasable. Puff is desired. If someone is desired then they are outside. If Marina is not erasable then Marina is desired. If Marina is outside then Marina is unmarred. If someone is scurvy and desired then they are unmarred. If someone is outside and not desired then they are unmarred. If someone is unmarred then they are scurvy. All erasable, unmarred people are scurvy. If someone is unmarred and not scurvy then they are screaky. Puff is not outside.", "logic": "\nOutside(elvira)\nRoughhewn(elvira)\nErasable(elvira)\nnot Desired(elvira)\nScreaky(elvira)\nScurvy(marina)\nnot Roughhewn(marina)\nDesired(marina)\nOutside(puff)\nRoughhewn(puff)\nErasable(puff)\nDesired(puff)\nforall x (Desired(x) -> Outside(x))\nnot Erasable(marina) -> Desired(marina)\nOutside(marina) -> Unmarred(marina)\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and Desired(x) -> Unmarred(x))\nforall x (Outside(x) and not Desired(x) -> Unmarred(x))\nforall x (Unmarred(x) -> Scurvy(x))\nforall x (Erasable(x) and Unmarred(x) -> Scurvy(x))\nforall x (Unmarred(x) and not Scurvy(x) -> Screaky(x))\n\nnot Outside(puff)\n\ntherefore Outside(puff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Darya is fastidious. Darya is imbricate. Darya is nonuniform. Darya is not flagrant. Darya is fascinated. Estelle is emblematic. Estelle is not imbricate. Estelle is flagrant. Brynn is fastidious. Brynn is imbricate. Brynn is nonuniform. Brynn is flagrant. If someone is flagrant then they are fastidious. If Estelle is not nonuniform then Estelle is flagrant. If Estelle is fastidious then Estelle is sacculate. If someone is emblematic and flagrant then they are sacculate. If someone is fastidious and not flagrant then they are sacculate. If someone is sacculate then they are emblematic. All nonuniform, sacculate people are emblematic. If someone is sacculate and not emblematic then they are fascinated. Estelle is fastidious.", "logic": "\nFastidious(darya)\nImbricate(darya)\nNonuniform(darya)\nnot Flagrant(darya)\nFascinated(darya)\nEmblematic(estelle)\nnot Imbricate(estelle)\nFlagrant(estelle)\nFastidious(brynn)\nImbricate(brynn)\nNonuniform(brynn)\nFlagrant(brynn)\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Fastidious(x))\nnot Nonuniform(estelle) -> Flagrant(estelle)\nFastidious(estelle) -> Sacculate(estelle)\nforall x (Emblematic(x) and Flagrant(x) -> Sacculate(x))\nforall x (Fastidious(x) and not Flagrant(x) -> Sacculate(x))\nforall x (Sacculate(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) and Sacculate(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Sacculate(x) and not Emblematic(x) -> Fascinated(x))\n\nFastidious(estelle)\n\nFlagrant(estelle) and forall x (Flagrant(x) -> Fastidious(x)) -> therefore Fastidious(estelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Teena is barefaced. Teena is willful. Teena is sweeping. Teena is not snappish. Teena is batwing. Kareem is allopatric. Kareem is not willful. Kareem is snappish. Duffie is barefaced. Duffie is willful. Duffie is sweeping. Duffie is snappish. If someone is snappish then they are barefaced. If Kareem is not sweeping then Kareem is snappish. If Kareem is barefaced then Kareem is ghostlike. If someone is allopatric and snappish then they are ghostlike. If someone is barefaced and not snappish then they are ghostlike. If someone is ghostlike then they are allopatric. All sweeping, ghostlike people are allopatric. If someone is ghostlike and not allopatric then they are batwing. Kareem is not ghostlike.", "logic": "\nBarefaced(teena)\nWillful(teena)\nSweeping(teena)\nnot Snappish(teena)\nBatwing(teena)\nAllopatric(kareem)\nnot Willful(kareem)\nSnappish(kareem)\nBarefaced(duffie)\nWillful(duffie)\nSweeping(duffie)\nSnappish(duffie)\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Barefaced(x))\nnot Sweeping(kareem) -> Snappish(kareem)\nBarefaced(kareem) -> Ghostlike(kareem)\nforall x (Allopatric(x) and Snappish(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Barefaced(x) and not Snappish(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Sweeping(x) and Ghostlike(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) and not Allopatric(x) -> Batwing(x))\n\nnot Ghostlike(kareem)\n\nAllopatric(kareem) and Snappish(kareem) and forall x (Allopatric(x) and Snappish(x) -> Ghostlike(x)) -> therefore Ghostlike(kareem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Alford is dispirited. Alford is mongolian. Alford is laryngeal. Alford is not hypertonic. Alford is geared. Claudette is sapphic. Claudette is not mongolian. Claudette is hypertonic. Meyer is dispirited. Meyer is mongolian. Meyer is laryngeal. Meyer is hypertonic. If someone is hypertonic then they are dispirited. If Claudette is not laryngeal then Claudette is hypertonic. If Claudette is dispirited then Claudette is shaggy. If someone is sapphic and hypertonic then they are shaggy. If someone is dispirited and not hypertonic then they are shaggy. If someone is shaggy then they are sapphic. All laryngeal, shaggy people are sapphic. If someone is shaggy and not sapphic then they are geared. Alford is sapphic.", "logic": "\nDispirited(alford)\nMongolian(alford)\nLaryngeal(alford)\nnot Hypertonic(alford)\nGeared(alford)\nSapphic(claudette)\nnot Mongolian(claudette)\nHypertonic(claudette)\nDispirited(meyer)\nMongolian(meyer)\nLaryngeal(meyer)\nHypertonic(meyer)\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Dispirited(x))\nnot Laryngeal(claudette) -> Hypertonic(claudette)\nDispirited(claudette) -> Shaggy(claudette)\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Hypertonic(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nforall x (Dispirited(x) and not Hypertonic(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nforall x (Shaggy(x) -> Sapphic(x))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) and Shaggy(x) -> Sapphic(x))\nforall x (Shaggy(x) and not Sapphic(x) -> Geared(x))\n\nSapphic(alford)\n\nDispirited(alford) and not Hypertonic(alford) and forall x (Dispirited(x) and not Hypertonic(x) -> Shaggy(x)) -> therefore Shaggy(alford) Shaggy(alford) and forall x (Shaggy(x) -> Sapphic(x)) -> therefore Sapphic(alford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Midge is glial. Midge is bogus. Midge is allotted. Midge is not isomeric. Midge is medical. Beaufort is garrulous. Beaufort is not bogus. Beaufort is isomeric. Mariette is glial. Mariette is bogus. Mariette is allotted. Mariette is isomeric. If someone is isomeric then they are glial. If Beaufort is not allotted then Beaufort is isomeric. If Beaufort is glial then Beaufort is abstruse. If someone is garrulous and isomeric then they are abstruse. If someone is glial and not isomeric then they are abstruse. If someone is abstruse then they are garrulous. All allotted, abstruse people are garrulous. If someone is abstruse and not garrulous then they are medical. Midge is not garrulous.", "logic": "\nGlial(midge)\nBogus(midge)\nAllotted(midge)\nnot Isomeric(midge)\nMedical(midge)\nGarrulous(beaufort)\nnot Bogus(beaufort)\nIsomeric(beaufort)\nGlial(mariette)\nBogus(mariette)\nAllotted(mariette)\nIsomeric(mariette)\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Glial(x))\nnot Allotted(beaufort) -> Isomeric(beaufort)\nGlial(beaufort) -> Abstruse(beaufort)\nforall x (Garrulous(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Glial(x) and not Isomeric(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Abstruse(x) -> Garrulous(x))\nforall x (Allotted(x) and Abstruse(x) -> Garrulous(x))\nforall x (Abstruse(x) and not Garrulous(x) -> Medical(x))\n\nnot Garrulous(midge)\n\nGlial(midge) and not Isomeric(midge) and forall x (Glial(x) and not Isomeric(x) -> Abstruse(x)) -> therefore Abstruse(midge) Abstruse(midge) and forall x (Abstruse(x) -> Garrulous(x)) -> therefore Garrulous(midge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Teddy is unanimated. Teddy is aphasic. Teddy is favorite. Teddy is not amylolytic. Teddy is notched. Lanny is hearty. Lanny is not aphasic. Lanny is amylolytic. Cybill is unanimated. Cybill is aphasic. Cybill is favorite. Cybill is amylolytic. If someone is amylolytic then they are unanimated. If Lanny is not favorite then Lanny is amylolytic. If Lanny is unanimated then Lanny is jaded. If someone is hearty and amylolytic then they are jaded. If someone is unanimated and not amylolytic then they are jaded. If someone is jaded then they are hearty. All favorite, jaded people are hearty. If someone is jaded and not hearty then they are notched. Lanny is not notched.", "logic": "\nUnanimated(teddy)\nAphasic(teddy)\nFavorite(teddy)\nnot Amylolytic(teddy)\nNotched(teddy)\nHearty(lanny)\nnot Aphasic(lanny)\nAmylolytic(lanny)\nUnanimated(cybill)\nAphasic(cybill)\nFavorite(cybill)\nAmylolytic(cybill)\nforall x (Amylolytic(x) -> Unanimated(x))\nnot Favorite(lanny) -> Amylolytic(lanny)\nUnanimated(lanny) -> Jaded(lanny)\nforall x (Hearty(x) and Amylolytic(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and not Amylolytic(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) -> Hearty(x))\nforall x (Favorite(x) and Jaded(x) -> Hearty(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) and not Hearty(x) -> Notched(x))\n\nnot Notched(lanny)\n\nforall x (Jaded(x) and not Hearty(x) -> Notched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Aile is early. Aile is pulmonary. Aile is bifurcated. Aile is not subfusc. Aile is benzenoid. Deryl is unforced. Deryl is not pulmonary. Deryl is subfusc. Christy is early. Christy is pulmonary. Christy is bifurcated. Christy is subfusc. If someone is subfusc then they are early. If Deryl is not bifurcated then Deryl is subfusc. If Deryl is early then Deryl is wartlike. If someone is unforced and subfusc then they are wartlike. If someone is early and not subfusc then they are wartlike. If someone is wartlike then they are unforced. All bifurcated, wartlike people are unforced. If someone is wartlike and not unforced then they are benzenoid. Christy is wartlike.", "logic": "\nEarly(aile)\nPulmonary(aile)\nBifurcated(aile)\nnot Subfusc(aile)\nBenzenoid(aile)\nUnforced(deryl)\nnot Pulmonary(deryl)\nSubfusc(deryl)\nEarly(christy)\nPulmonary(christy)\nBifurcated(christy)\nSubfusc(christy)\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Early(x))\nnot Bifurcated(deryl) -> Subfusc(deryl)\nEarly(deryl) -> Wartlike(deryl)\nforall x (Unforced(x) and Subfusc(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Early(x) and not Subfusc(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) and Wartlike(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) and not Unforced(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\n\nWartlike(christy)\n\nforall x (Unforced(x) and Subfusc(x) -> Wartlike(x)) <- forall x (Wartlike(x) -> Unforced(x)) <- forall x (Early(x) and not Subfusc(x) -> Wartlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Dolores is unschooled. Dolores is dislikable. Dolores is ataractic. Dolores is not simian. Dolores is incomplete. Amber is arbitrable. Amber is not dislikable. Amber is simian. Darrell is unschooled. Darrell is dislikable. Darrell is ataractic. Darrell is simian. If someone is simian then they are unschooled. If Amber is not ataractic then Amber is simian. If Amber is unschooled then Amber is waning. If someone is arbitrable and simian then they are waning. If someone is unschooled and not simian then they are waning. If someone is waning then they are arbitrable. All ataractic, waning people are arbitrable. If someone is waning and not arbitrable then they are incomplete. Darrell is not incomplete.", "logic": "\nUnschooled(dolores)\nDislikable(dolores)\nAtaractic(dolores)\nnot Simian(dolores)\nIncomplete(dolores)\nArbitrable(amber)\nnot Dislikable(amber)\nSimian(amber)\nUnschooled(darrell)\nDislikable(darrell)\nAtaractic(darrell)\nSimian(darrell)\nforall x (Simian(x) -> Unschooled(x))\nnot Ataractic(amber) -> Simian(amber)\nUnschooled(amber) -> Waning(amber)\nforall x (Arbitrable(x) and Simian(x) -> Waning(x))\nforall x (Unschooled(x) and not Simian(x) -> Waning(x))\nforall x (Waning(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Ataractic(x) and Waning(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Waning(x) and not Arbitrable(x) -> Incomplete(x))\n\nnot Incomplete(darrell)\n\nforall x (Waning(x) and not Arbitrable(x) -> Incomplete(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "Louie is carboxylic. Louie is burbling. Louie is untanned. Louie is not alternate. Louie is sneering. Mariette is shaved. Mariette is not burbling. Mariette is alternate. Aloysius is carboxylic. Aloysius is burbling. Aloysius is untanned. Aloysius is alternate. If someone is alternate then they are carboxylic. If Mariette is not untanned then Mariette is alternate. If Mariette is carboxylic then Mariette is glowing. If someone is shaved and alternate then they are glowing. If someone is carboxylic and not alternate then they are glowing. If someone is glowing then they are shaved. All untanned, glowing people are shaved. If someone is glowing and not shaved then they are sneering. Mariette is untanned.", "logic": "\nCarboxylic(louie)\nBurbling(louie)\nUntanned(louie)\nnot Alternate(louie)\nSneering(louie)\nShaved(mariette)\nnot Burbling(mariette)\nAlternate(mariette)\nCarboxylic(aloysius)\nBurbling(aloysius)\nUntanned(aloysius)\nAlternate(aloysius)\nforall x (Alternate(x) -> Carboxylic(x))\nnot Untanned(mariette) -> Alternate(mariette)\nCarboxylic(mariette) -> Glowing(mariette)\nforall x (Shaved(x) and Alternate(x) -> Glowing(x))\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) and not Alternate(x) -> Glowing(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Shaved(x))\nforall x (Untanned(x) and Glowing(x) -> Shaved(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) and not Shaved(x) -> Sneering(x))\n\nUntanned(mariette)\n\nUntanned(mariette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-791"} {"premises": "The aleks tarry the osgood. The aleks tarry the pepillo. The aleks is tamil. The aleks crown the osgood. The osgood tarry the pepillo. The osgood is snuggled. The osgood is spinnable. The pepillo is central. The pepillo lard the aleks. The pepillo crown the aleks. If someone tarry the pepillo and the pepillo tarry the aleks then they are spinnable. If someone tarry the aleks then they need the aleks. If someone tarry the osgood then they eat the aleks. If someone crown the osgood then they need the aleks. If someone is snuggled then they like the aleks. If someone crown the osgood and they eat the aleks then the aleks lard the osgood. If someone crown the pepillo and the pepillo lard the aleks then the aleks tarry the pepillo. If someone is hebrew and they need the aleks then they eat the aleks. The aleks crown the osgood.", "logic": "\nTarry(aleks, osgood)\nTarry(aleks, pepillo)\nTamil(aleks)\nCrown(aleks, osgood)\nTarry(osgood, pepillo)\nSnuggled(osgood)\nSpinnable(osgood)\nCentral(pepillo)\nLard(pepillo, aleks)\nCrown(pepillo, aleks)\nforall x (Tarry(x, pepillo) and Tarry(pepillo, aleks) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Tarry(x, aleks) -> Crown(x, aleks))\nforall x (Tarry(x, osgood) -> Tarry(x, aleks))\nforall x (Crown(x, osgood) -> Crown(x, aleks))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> Lard(x, aleks))\nforall x (Crown(x, osgood) and Tarry(x, aleks) -> Lard(aleks, osgood))\nforall x (Crown(x, pepillo) and Lard(pepillo, aleks) -> Tarry(aleks, pepillo))\nforall x (Hebrew(x) and Crown(x, aleks) -> Tarry(x, aleks))\n\nCrown(aleks, osgood)\n\ntherefore Crown(aleks, osgood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The corena signal the merell. The corena signal the mika. The corena is concrete. The corena dong the merell. The merell signal the mika. The merell is rouged. The merell is pocketable. The mika is monotonous. The mika foster the corena. The mika dong the corena. If someone signal the mika and the mika signal the corena then they are pocketable. If someone signal the corena then they need the corena. If someone signal the merell then they eat the corena. If someone dong the merell then they need the corena. If someone is rouged then they like the corena. If someone dong the merell and they eat the corena then the corena foster the merell. If someone dong the mika and the mika foster the corena then the corena signal the mika. If someone is unhurried and they need the corena then they eat the corena. The corena does not eat the mika.", "logic": "\nSignal(corena, merell)\nSignal(corena, mika)\nConcrete(corena)\nDong(corena, merell)\nSignal(merell, mika)\nRouged(merell)\nPocketable(merell)\nMonotonous(mika)\nFoster(mika, corena)\nDong(mika, corena)\nforall x (Signal(x, mika) and Signal(mika, corena) -> Pocketable(x))\nforall x (Signal(x, corena) -> Dong(x, corena))\nforall x (Signal(x, merell) -> Signal(x, corena))\nforall x (Dong(x, merell) -> Dong(x, corena))\nforall x (Rouged(x) -> Foster(x, corena))\nforall x (Dong(x, merell) and Signal(x, corena) -> Foster(corena, merell))\nforall x (Dong(x, mika) and Foster(mika, corena) -> Signal(corena, mika))\nforall x (Unhurried(x) and Dong(x, corena) -> Signal(x, corena))\n\nnot Signal(corena, mika)\n\ntherefore Signal(corena, mika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The cathee redouble the dionis. The cathee redouble the alica. The cathee is orientated. The cathee rhumba the dionis. The dionis redouble the alica. The dionis is aegean. The dionis is clawlike. The alica is slanderous. The alica dress the cathee. The alica rhumba the cathee. If someone redouble the alica and the alica redouble the cathee then they are clawlike. If someone redouble the cathee then they need the cathee. If someone redouble the dionis then they eat the cathee. If someone rhumba the dionis then they need the cathee. If someone is aegean then they like the cathee. If someone rhumba the dionis and they eat the cathee then the cathee dress the dionis. If someone rhumba the alica and the alica dress the cathee then the cathee redouble the alica. If someone is pilary and they need the cathee then they eat the cathee. The dionis dress the cathee.", "logic": "\nRedouble(cathee, dionis)\nRedouble(cathee, alica)\nOrientated(cathee)\nRhumba(cathee, dionis)\nRedouble(dionis, alica)\nAegean(dionis)\nClawlike(dionis)\nSlanderous(alica)\nDress(alica, cathee)\nRhumba(alica, cathee)\nforall x (Redouble(x, alica) and Redouble(alica, cathee) -> Clawlike(x))\nforall x (Redouble(x, cathee) -> Rhumba(x, cathee))\nforall x (Redouble(x, dionis) -> Redouble(x, cathee))\nforall x (Rhumba(x, dionis) -> Rhumba(x, cathee))\nforall x (Aegean(x) -> Dress(x, cathee))\nforall x (Rhumba(x, dionis) and Redouble(x, cathee) -> Dress(cathee, dionis))\nforall x (Rhumba(x, alica) and Dress(alica, cathee) -> Redouble(cathee, alica))\nforall x (Pilary(x) and Rhumba(x, cathee) -> Redouble(x, cathee))\n\nDress(dionis, cathee)\n\nAegean(dionis) and forall x (Aegean(x) -> Dress(x, cathee)) -> therefore Dress(dionis, cathee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The bridie institute the jefferson. The bridie institute the dianne. The bridie is anaclinal. The bridie prattle the jefferson. The jefferson institute the dianne. The jefferson is profligate. The jefferson is biased. The dianne is eastbound. The dianne melanise the bridie. The dianne prattle the bridie. If someone institute the dianne and the dianne institute the bridie then they are biased. If someone institute the bridie then they need the bridie. If someone institute the jefferson then they eat the bridie. If someone prattle the jefferson then they need the bridie. If someone is profligate then they like the bridie. If someone prattle the jefferson and they eat the bridie then the bridie melanise the jefferson. If someone prattle the dianne and the dianne melanise the bridie then the bridie institute the dianne. If someone is hybrid and they need the bridie then they eat the bridie. The jefferson does not like the bridie.", "logic": "\nInstitute(bridie, jefferson)\nInstitute(bridie, dianne)\nAnaclinal(bridie)\nPrattle(bridie, jefferson)\nInstitute(jefferson, dianne)\nProfligate(jefferson)\nBiased(jefferson)\nEastbound(dianne)\nMelanise(dianne, bridie)\nPrattle(dianne, bridie)\nforall x (Institute(x, dianne) and Institute(dianne, bridie) -> Biased(x))\nforall x (Institute(x, bridie) -> Prattle(x, bridie))\nforall x (Institute(x, jefferson) -> Institute(x, bridie))\nforall x (Prattle(x, jefferson) -> Prattle(x, bridie))\nforall x (Profligate(x) -> Melanise(x, bridie))\nforall x (Prattle(x, jefferson) and Institute(x, bridie) -> Melanise(bridie, jefferson))\nforall x (Prattle(x, dianne) and Melanise(dianne, bridie) -> Institute(bridie, dianne))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) and Prattle(x, bridie) -> Institute(x, bridie))\n\nnot Melanise(jefferson, bridie)\n\nProfligate(jefferson) and forall x (Profligate(x) -> Melanise(x, bridie)) -> therefore Melanise(jefferson, bridie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The teri reignite the alis. The teri reignite the elaina. The teri is rambling. The teri backfire the alis. The alis reignite the elaina. The alis is gorgeous. The alis is unseen. The elaina is uncounted. The elaina metalize the teri. The elaina backfire the teri. If someone reignite the elaina and the elaina reignite the teri then they are unseen. If someone reignite the teri then they need the teri. If someone reignite the alis then they eat the teri. If someone backfire the alis then they need the teri. If someone is gorgeous then they like the teri. If someone backfire the alis and they eat the teri then the teri metalize the alis. If someone backfire the elaina and the elaina metalize the teri then the teri reignite the elaina. If someone is endangered and they need the teri then they eat the teri. The teri metalize the alis.", "logic": "\nReignite(teri, alis)\nReignite(teri, elaina)\nRambling(teri)\nBackfire(teri, alis)\nReignite(alis, elaina)\nGorgeous(alis)\nUnseen(alis)\nUncounted(elaina)\nMetalize(elaina, teri)\nBackfire(elaina, teri)\nforall x (Reignite(x, elaina) and Reignite(elaina, teri) -> Unseen(x))\nforall x (Reignite(x, teri) -> Backfire(x, teri))\nforall x (Reignite(x, alis) -> Reignite(x, teri))\nforall x (Backfire(x, alis) -> Backfire(x, teri))\nforall x (Gorgeous(x) -> Metalize(x, teri))\nforall x (Backfire(x, alis) and Reignite(x, teri) -> Metalize(teri, alis))\nforall x (Backfire(x, elaina) and Metalize(elaina, teri) -> Reignite(teri, elaina))\nforall x (Endangered(x) and Backfire(x, teri) -> Reignite(x, teri))\n\nMetalize(teri, alis)\n\nReignite(teri, alis) and forall x (Reignite(x, alis) -> Reignite(x, teri)) -> therefore Reignite(teri, teri) Backfire(teri, alis) and Reignite(teri, teri) and forall x (Backfire(x, alis) and Reignite(x, teri) -> Metalize(teri, alis)) -> therefore Metalize(teri, alis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The storm outcry the raquel. The storm outcry the evangelin. The storm is acting. The storm overvalue the raquel. The raquel outcry the evangelin. The raquel is inexorable. The raquel is sisterly. The evangelin is venerating. The evangelin accouter the storm. The evangelin overvalue the storm. If someone outcry the evangelin and the evangelin outcry the storm then they are sisterly. If someone outcry the storm then they need the storm. If someone outcry the raquel then they eat the storm. If someone overvalue the raquel then they need the storm. If someone is inexorable then they like the storm. If someone overvalue the raquel and they eat the storm then the storm accouter the raquel. If someone overvalue the evangelin and the evangelin accouter the storm then the storm outcry the evangelin. If someone is nonsexual and they need the storm then they eat the storm. The storm does not like the raquel.", "logic": "\nOutcry(storm, raquel)\nOutcry(storm, evangelin)\nActing(storm)\nOvervalue(storm, raquel)\nOutcry(raquel, evangelin)\nInexorable(raquel)\nSisterly(raquel)\nVenerating(evangelin)\nAccouter(evangelin, storm)\nOvervalue(evangelin, storm)\nforall x (Outcry(x, evangelin) and Outcry(evangelin, storm) -> Sisterly(x))\nforall x (Outcry(x, storm) -> Overvalue(x, storm))\nforall x (Outcry(x, raquel) -> Outcry(x, storm))\nforall x (Overvalue(x, raquel) -> Overvalue(x, storm))\nforall x (Inexorable(x) -> Accouter(x, storm))\nforall x (Overvalue(x, raquel) and Outcry(x, storm) -> Accouter(storm, raquel))\nforall x (Overvalue(x, evangelin) and Accouter(evangelin, storm) -> Outcry(storm, evangelin))\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) and Overvalue(x, storm) -> Outcry(x, storm))\n\nnot Accouter(storm, raquel)\n\nOutcry(storm, raquel) and forall x (Outcry(x, raquel) -> Outcry(x, storm)) -> therefore Outcry(storm, storm) Overvalue(storm, raquel) and Outcry(storm, storm) and forall x (Overvalue(x, raquel) and Outcry(x, storm) -> Accouter(storm, raquel)) -> therefore Accouter(storm, raquel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The nils subject the basia. The nils subject the ally. The nils is tingling. The nils disembody the basia. The basia subject the ally. The basia is wound. The basia is delineate. The ally is heroical. The ally misprint the nils. The ally disembody the nils. If someone subject the ally and the ally subject the nils then they are delineate. If someone subject the nils then they need the nils. If someone subject the basia then they eat the nils. If someone disembody the basia then they need the nils. If someone is wound then they like the nils. If someone disembody the basia and they eat the nils then the nils misprint the basia. If someone disembody the ally and the ally misprint the nils then the nils subject the ally. If someone is futile and they need the nils then they eat the nils. The basia does not eat the nils.", "logic": "\nSubject(nils, basia)\nSubject(nils, ally)\nTingling(nils)\nDisembody(nils, basia)\nSubject(basia, ally)\nWound(basia)\nDelineate(basia)\nHeroical(ally)\nMisprint(ally, nils)\nDisembody(ally, nils)\nforall x (Subject(x, ally) and Subject(ally, nils) -> Delineate(x))\nforall x (Subject(x, nils) -> Disembody(x, nils))\nforall x (Subject(x, basia) -> Subject(x, nils))\nforall x (Disembody(x, basia) -> Disembody(x, nils))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Misprint(x, nils))\nforall x (Disembody(x, basia) and Subject(x, nils) -> Misprint(nils, basia))\nforall x (Disembody(x, ally) and Misprint(ally, nils) -> Subject(nils, ally))\nforall x (Futile(x) and Disembody(x, nils) -> Subject(x, nils))\n\nnot Subject(basia, nils)\n\nforall x (Subject(x, basia) -> Subject(x, nils)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The darb parachute the cecilla. The darb parachute the anita. The darb is encircling. The darb skedaddle the cecilla. The cecilla parachute the anita. The cecilla is assured. The cecilla is bashful. The anita is appetitive. The anita smell the darb. The anita skedaddle the darb. If someone parachute the anita and the anita parachute the darb then they are bashful. If someone parachute the darb then they need the darb. If someone parachute the cecilla then they eat the darb. If someone skedaddle the cecilla then they need the darb. If someone is assured then they like the darb. If someone skedaddle the cecilla and they eat the darb then the darb smell the cecilla. If someone skedaddle the anita and the anita smell the darb then the darb parachute the anita. If someone is silklike and they need the darb then they eat the darb. The darb is bashful.", "logic": "\nParachute(darb, cecilla)\nParachute(darb, anita)\nEncircling(darb)\nSkedaddle(darb, cecilla)\nParachute(cecilla, anita)\nAssured(cecilla)\nBashful(cecilla)\nAppetitive(anita)\nSmell(anita, darb)\nSkedaddle(anita, darb)\nforall x (Parachute(x, anita) and Parachute(anita, darb) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Parachute(x, darb) -> Skedaddle(x, darb))\nforall x (Parachute(x, cecilla) -> Parachute(x, darb))\nforall x (Skedaddle(x, cecilla) -> Skedaddle(x, darb))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Smell(x, darb))\nforall x (Skedaddle(x, cecilla) and Parachute(x, darb) -> Smell(darb, cecilla))\nforall x (Skedaddle(x, anita) and Smell(anita, darb) -> Parachute(darb, anita))\nforall x (Silklike(x) and Skedaddle(x, darb) -> Parachute(x, darb))\n\nBashful(darb)\n\nforall x (Parachute(x, anita) and Parachute(anita, darb) -> Bashful(x)) <- forall x (Parachute(x, cecilla) -> Parachute(x, darb)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The lucy secure the cappella. The lucy secure the knox. The lucy is estuarial. The lucy mosey the cappella. The cappella secure the knox. The cappella is cordiform. The cappella is idealised. The knox is unuseable. The knox liberate the lucy. The knox mosey the lucy. If someone secure the knox and the knox secure the lucy then they are idealised. If someone secure the lucy then they need the lucy. If someone secure the cappella then they eat the lucy. If someone mosey the cappella then they need the lucy. If someone is cordiform then they like the lucy. If someone mosey the cappella and they eat the lucy then the lucy liberate the cappella. If someone mosey the knox and the knox liberate the lucy then the lucy secure the knox. If someone is obsolete and they need the lucy then they eat the lucy. The knox is not idealised.", "logic": "\nSecure(lucy, cappella)\nSecure(lucy, knox)\nEstuarial(lucy)\nMosey(lucy, cappella)\nSecure(cappella, knox)\nCordiform(cappella)\nIdealised(cappella)\nUnuseable(knox)\nLiberate(knox, lucy)\nMosey(knox, lucy)\nforall x (Secure(x, knox) and Secure(knox, lucy) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Secure(x, lucy) -> Mosey(x, lucy))\nforall x (Secure(x, cappella) -> Secure(x, lucy))\nforall x (Mosey(x, cappella) -> Mosey(x, lucy))\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> Liberate(x, lucy))\nforall x (Mosey(x, cappella) and Secure(x, lucy) -> Liberate(lucy, cappella))\nforall x (Mosey(x, knox) and Liberate(knox, lucy) -> Secure(lucy, knox))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) and Mosey(x, lucy) -> Secure(x, lucy))\n\nnot Idealised(knox)\n\nforall x (Secure(x, knox) and Secure(knox, lucy) -> Idealised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The zuzana macadamize the guinna. The zuzana macadamize the tresa. The zuzana is cankerous. The zuzana exhaust the guinna. The guinna macadamize the tresa. The guinna is bruising. The guinna is sleety. The tresa is sizeable. The tresa fart the zuzana. The tresa exhaust the zuzana. If someone macadamize the tresa and the tresa macadamize the zuzana then they are sleety. If someone macadamize the zuzana then they need the zuzana. If someone macadamize the guinna then they eat the zuzana. If someone exhaust the guinna then they need the zuzana. If someone is bruising then they like the zuzana. If someone exhaust the guinna and they eat the zuzana then the zuzana fart the guinna. If someone exhaust the tresa and the tresa fart the zuzana then the zuzana macadamize the tresa. If someone is clunky and they need the zuzana then they eat the zuzana. The guinna is clunky.", "logic": "\nMacadamize(zuzana, guinna)\nMacadamize(zuzana, tresa)\nCankerous(zuzana)\nExhaust(zuzana, guinna)\nMacadamize(guinna, tresa)\nBruising(guinna)\nSleety(guinna)\nSizeable(tresa)\nFart(tresa, zuzana)\nExhaust(tresa, zuzana)\nforall x (Macadamize(x, tresa) and Macadamize(tresa, zuzana) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Macadamize(x, zuzana) -> Exhaust(x, zuzana))\nforall x (Macadamize(x, guinna) -> Macadamize(x, zuzana))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, guinna) -> Exhaust(x, zuzana))\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> Fart(x, zuzana))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, guinna) and Macadamize(x, zuzana) -> Fart(zuzana, guinna))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, tresa) and Fart(tresa, zuzana) -> Macadamize(zuzana, tresa))\nforall x (Clunky(x) and Exhaust(x, zuzana) -> Macadamize(x, zuzana))\n\nClunky(guinna)\n\nClunky(guinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The benjamin impugn the truda. The benjamin impugn the gwendolin. The benjamin is sadistic. The benjamin bench the truda. The truda impugn the gwendolin. The truda is lactic. The truda is rotary. The gwendolin is corky. The gwendolin steamer the benjamin. The gwendolin bench the benjamin. If someone impugn the gwendolin and the gwendolin impugn the benjamin then they are rotary. If someone impugn the benjamin then they need the benjamin. If someone impugn the truda then they eat the benjamin. If someone bench the truda then they need the benjamin. If someone is lactic then they like the benjamin. If someone bench the truda and they eat the benjamin then the benjamin steamer the truda. If someone bench the gwendolin and the gwendolin steamer the benjamin then the benjamin impugn the gwendolin. If someone is hierarchic and they need the benjamin then they eat the benjamin. The gwendolin is not lactic.", "logic": "\nImpugn(benjamin, truda)\nImpugn(benjamin, gwendolin)\nSadistic(benjamin)\nBench(benjamin, truda)\nImpugn(truda, gwendolin)\nLactic(truda)\nRotary(truda)\nCorky(gwendolin)\nSteamer(gwendolin, benjamin)\nBench(gwendolin, benjamin)\nforall x (Impugn(x, gwendolin) and Impugn(gwendolin, benjamin) -> Rotary(x))\nforall x (Impugn(x, benjamin) -> Bench(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Impugn(x, truda) -> Impugn(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Bench(x, truda) -> Bench(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Lactic(x) -> Steamer(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Bench(x, truda) and Impugn(x, benjamin) -> Steamer(benjamin, truda))\nforall x (Bench(x, gwendolin) and Steamer(gwendolin, benjamin) -> Impugn(benjamin, gwendolin))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Bench(x, benjamin) -> Impugn(x, benjamin))\n\nnot Lactic(gwendolin)\n\nnot Lactic(gwendolin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "The leandra convolve the eada. The leandra convolve the tedda. The leandra is unversed. The leandra rectify the eada. The eada convolve the tedda. The eada is sanctified. The eada is sighted. The tedda is gimbaled. The tedda rough the leandra. The tedda rectify the leandra. If someone convolve the tedda and the tedda convolve the leandra then they are sighted. If someone convolve the leandra then they need the leandra. If someone convolve the eada then they eat the leandra. If someone rectify the eada then they need the leandra. If someone is sanctified then they like the leandra. If someone rectify the eada and they eat the leandra then the leandra rough the eada. If someone rectify the tedda and the tedda rough the leandra then the leandra convolve the tedda. If someone is shinto and they need the leandra then they eat the leandra. The eada is gimbaled.", "logic": "\nConvolve(leandra, eada)\nConvolve(leandra, tedda)\nUnversed(leandra)\nRectify(leandra, eada)\nConvolve(eada, tedda)\nSanctified(eada)\nSighted(eada)\nGimbaled(tedda)\nRough(tedda, leandra)\nRectify(tedda, leandra)\nforall x (Convolve(x, tedda) and Convolve(tedda, leandra) -> Sighted(x))\nforall x (Convolve(x, leandra) -> Rectify(x, leandra))\nforall x (Convolve(x, eada) -> Convolve(x, leandra))\nforall x (Rectify(x, eada) -> Rectify(x, leandra))\nforall x (Sanctified(x) -> Rough(x, leandra))\nforall x (Rectify(x, eada) and Convolve(x, leandra) -> Rough(leandra, eada))\nforall x (Rectify(x, tedda) and Rough(tedda, leandra) -> Convolve(leandra, tedda))\nforall x (Shinto(x) and Rectify(x, leandra) -> Convolve(x, leandra))\n\nGimbaled(eada)\n\nGimbaled(eada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2158"} {"premises": "Rhianna is union. Rhianna is nidicolous. Kelwin is union. Kelwin is satiate. Kelwin is biannual. Kelwin is honduran. Lilas is cypriote. Lilas is union. Lilas is biannual. Lilas is nidicolous. Lilas is rotatable. Lilas is honduran. Victoria is cypriote. Victoria is satiate. Victoria is rotatable. Victoria is honduran. All union things are cypriote. Furry, cypriote things are satiate. If Kelwin is honduran then Kelwin is biannual. Victoria is satiate.", "logic": "\nUnion(rhianna)\nNidicolous(rhianna)\nUnion(kelwin)\nSatiate(kelwin)\nBiannual(kelwin)\nHonduran(kelwin)\nCypriote(lilas)\nUnion(lilas)\nBiannual(lilas)\nNidicolous(lilas)\nRotatable(lilas)\nHonduran(lilas)\nCypriote(victoria)\nSatiate(victoria)\nRotatable(victoria)\nHonduran(victoria)\nforall x (Union(x) -> Cypriote(x))\nforall x (Union(x) and Cypriote(x) -> Satiate(x))\nHonduran(kelwin) -> Biannual(kelwin)\n\nSatiate(victoria)\n\ntherefore Satiate(victoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Jenny is extendable. Jenny is pleasing. Thane is extendable. Thane is iberian. Thane is gobsmacked. Thane is enough. Clayborne is palmatifid. Clayborne is extendable. Clayborne is gobsmacked. Clayborne is pleasing. Clayborne is spoilable. Clayborne is enough. Petra is palmatifid. Petra is iberian. Petra is spoilable. Petra is enough. All extendable things are palmatifid. Furry, palmatifid things are iberian. If Thane is enough then Thane is gobsmacked. Thane is not extendable.", "logic": "\nExtendable(jenny)\nPleasing(jenny)\nExtendable(thane)\nIberian(thane)\nGobsmacked(thane)\nEnough(thane)\nPalmatifid(clayborne)\nExtendable(clayborne)\nGobsmacked(clayborne)\nPleasing(clayborne)\nSpoilable(clayborne)\nEnough(clayborne)\nPalmatifid(petra)\nIberian(petra)\nSpoilable(petra)\nEnough(petra)\nforall x (Extendable(x) -> Palmatifid(x))\nforall x (Extendable(x) and Palmatifid(x) -> Iberian(x))\nEnough(thane) -> Gobsmacked(thane)\n\nnot Extendable(thane)\n\ntherefore Extendable(thane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Rajeev is palpable. Rajeev is parve. Sandro is palpable. Sandro is preset. Sandro is gelid. Sandro is steerable. Gabriell is valvular. Gabriell is palpable. Gabriell is gelid. Gabriell is parve. Gabriell is masted. Gabriell is steerable. Skippie is valvular. Skippie is preset. Skippie is masted. Skippie is steerable. All palpable things are valvular. Furry, valvular things are preset. If Sandro is steerable then Sandro is gelid. Gabriell is preset.", "logic": "\nPalpable(rajeev)\nParve(rajeev)\nPalpable(sandro)\nPreset(sandro)\nGelid(sandro)\nSteerable(sandro)\nValvular(gabriell)\nPalpable(gabriell)\nGelid(gabriell)\nParve(gabriell)\nMasted(gabriell)\nSteerable(gabriell)\nValvular(skippie)\nPreset(skippie)\nMasted(skippie)\nSteerable(skippie)\nforall x (Palpable(x) -> Valvular(x))\nforall x (Palpable(x) and Valvular(x) -> Preset(x))\nSteerable(sandro) -> Gelid(sandro)\n\nPreset(gabriell)\n\nPalpable(gabriell) and Valvular(gabriell) and forall x (Palpable(x) and Valvular(x) -> Preset(x)) -> therefore Preset(gabriell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Zachary is insured. Zachary is grasping. Felice is insured. Felice is cephalopod. Felice is dormy. Felice is victimised. Mendel is omissible. Mendel is insured. Mendel is dormy. Mendel is grasping. Mendel is shambolic. Mendel is victimised. Kalindi is omissible. Kalindi is cephalopod. Kalindi is shambolic. Kalindi is victimised. All insured things are omissible. Furry, omissible things are cephalopod. If Felice is victimised then Felice is dormy. Mendel is not cephalopod.", "logic": "\nInsured(zachary)\nGrasping(zachary)\nInsured(felice)\nCephalopod(felice)\nDormy(felice)\nVictimised(felice)\nOmissible(mendel)\nInsured(mendel)\nDormy(mendel)\nGrasping(mendel)\nShambolic(mendel)\nVictimised(mendel)\nOmissible(kalindi)\nCephalopod(kalindi)\nShambolic(kalindi)\nVictimised(kalindi)\nforall x (Insured(x) -> Omissible(x))\nforall x (Insured(x) and Omissible(x) -> Cephalopod(x))\nVictimised(felice) -> Dormy(felice)\n\nnot Cephalopod(mendel)\n\nInsured(mendel) and Omissible(mendel) and forall x (Insured(x) and Omissible(x) -> Cephalopod(x)) -> therefore Cephalopod(mendel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Roxi is nonporous. Roxi is flammable. Sukey is nonporous. Sukey is prefab. Sukey is legato. Sukey is rugged. Laurice is fortuitous. Laurice is nonporous. Laurice is legato. Laurice is flammable. Laurice is saprozoic. Laurice is rugged. Hetti is fortuitous. Hetti is prefab. Hetti is saprozoic. Hetti is rugged. All nonporous things are fortuitous. Furry, fortuitous things are prefab. If Sukey is rugged then Sukey is legato. Roxi is prefab.", "logic": "\nNonporous(roxi)\nFlammable(roxi)\nNonporous(sukey)\nPrefab(sukey)\nLegato(sukey)\nRugged(sukey)\nFortuitous(laurice)\nNonporous(laurice)\nLegato(laurice)\nFlammable(laurice)\nSaprozoic(laurice)\nRugged(laurice)\nFortuitous(hetti)\nPrefab(hetti)\nSaprozoic(hetti)\nRugged(hetti)\nforall x (Nonporous(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Nonporous(x) and Fortuitous(x) -> Prefab(x))\nRugged(sukey) -> Legato(sukey)\n\nPrefab(roxi)\n\nNonporous(roxi) and forall x (Nonporous(x) -> Fortuitous(x)) -> therefore Fortuitous(roxi) Nonporous(roxi) and Fortuitous(roxi) and forall x (Nonporous(x) and Fortuitous(x) -> Prefab(x)) -> therefore Prefab(roxi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Sarette is triangular. Sarette is fecund. Edee is triangular. Edee is reassuring. Edee is seeing. Edee is impendent. Reeva is topmost. Reeva is triangular. Reeva is seeing. Reeva is fecund. Reeva is strenuous. Reeva is impendent. Marianna is topmost. Marianna is reassuring. Marianna is strenuous. Marianna is impendent. All triangular things are topmost. Furry, topmost things are reassuring. If Edee is impendent then Edee is seeing. Sarette is not reassuring.", "logic": "\nTriangular(sarette)\nFecund(sarette)\nTriangular(edee)\nReassuring(edee)\nSeeing(edee)\nImpendent(edee)\nTopmost(reeva)\nTriangular(reeva)\nSeeing(reeva)\nFecund(reeva)\nStrenuous(reeva)\nImpendent(reeva)\nTopmost(marianna)\nReassuring(marianna)\nStrenuous(marianna)\nImpendent(marianna)\nforall x (Triangular(x) -> Topmost(x))\nforall x (Triangular(x) and Topmost(x) -> Reassuring(x))\nImpendent(edee) -> Seeing(edee)\n\nnot Reassuring(sarette)\n\nTriangular(sarette) and forall x (Triangular(x) -> Topmost(x)) -> therefore Topmost(sarette) Triangular(sarette) and Topmost(sarette) and forall x (Triangular(x) and Topmost(x) -> Reassuring(x)) -> therefore Reassuring(sarette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Rivkah is mere. Rivkah is taupe. Theda is mere. Theda is guiltless. Theda is stabilized. Theda is forficate. Cloris is ancient. Cloris is mere. Cloris is stabilized. Cloris is taupe. Cloris is angelic. Cloris is forficate. Niels is ancient. Niels is guiltless. Niels is angelic. Niels is forficate. All mere things are ancient. Furry, ancient things are guiltless. If Theda is forficate then Theda is stabilized. Niels is not stabilized.", "logic": "\nMere(rivkah)\nTaupe(rivkah)\nMere(theda)\nGuiltless(theda)\nStabilized(theda)\nForficate(theda)\nAncient(cloris)\nMere(cloris)\nStabilized(cloris)\nTaupe(cloris)\nAngelic(cloris)\nForficate(cloris)\nAncient(niels)\nGuiltless(niels)\nAngelic(niels)\nForficate(niels)\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Ancient(x))\nforall x (Mere(x) and Ancient(x) -> Guiltless(x))\nForficate(theda) -> Stabilized(theda)\n\nnot Stabilized(niels)\n\nnot Stabilized(niels) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Bill is keen. Bill is tasteless. Gabrielle is keen. Gabrielle is playful. Gabrielle is jawed. Gabrielle is mineral. Maisey is bleary. Maisey is keen. Maisey is jawed. Maisey is tasteless. Maisey is outgoing. Maisey is mineral. Truman is bleary. Truman is playful. Truman is outgoing. Truman is mineral. All keen things are bleary. Furry, bleary things are playful. If Gabrielle is mineral then Gabrielle is jawed. Bill is outgoing.", "logic": "\nKeen(bill)\nTasteless(bill)\nKeen(gabrielle)\nPlayful(gabrielle)\nJawed(gabrielle)\nMineral(gabrielle)\nBleary(maisey)\nKeen(maisey)\nJawed(maisey)\nTasteless(maisey)\nOutgoing(maisey)\nMineral(maisey)\nBleary(truman)\nPlayful(truman)\nOutgoing(truman)\nMineral(truman)\nforall x (Keen(x) -> Bleary(x))\nforall x (Keen(x) and Bleary(x) -> Playful(x))\nMineral(gabrielle) -> Jawed(gabrielle)\n\nOutgoing(bill)\n\nOutgoing(bill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Monte is freckled. Monte is rodlike. Darcey is freckled. Darcey is textile. Darcey is unmeasured. Darcey is flexible. Leyla is sepulchral. Leyla is freckled. Leyla is unmeasured. Leyla is rodlike. Leyla is mesenteric. Leyla is flexible. Darice is sepulchral. Darice is textile. Darice is mesenteric. Darice is flexible. All freckled things are sepulchral. Furry, sepulchral things are textile. If Darcey is flexible then Darcey is unmeasured. Darice is not rodlike.", "logic": "\nFreckled(monte)\nRodlike(monte)\nFreckled(darcey)\nTextile(darcey)\nUnmeasured(darcey)\nFlexible(darcey)\nSepulchral(leyla)\nFreckled(leyla)\nUnmeasured(leyla)\nRodlike(leyla)\nMesenteric(leyla)\nFlexible(leyla)\nSepulchral(darice)\nTextile(darice)\nMesenteric(darice)\nFlexible(darice)\nforall x (Freckled(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nforall x (Freckled(x) and Sepulchral(x) -> Textile(x))\nFlexible(darcey) -> Unmeasured(darcey)\n\nnot Rodlike(darice)\n\nnot Rodlike(darice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Florencia is counter. Florencia is rutted. Fairfax is counter. Fairfax is precocial. Fairfax is sparkly. Fairfax is boastful. Chane is sporadic. Chane is counter. Chane is sparkly. Chane is rutted. Chane is coseismic. Chane is boastful. Philipa is sporadic. Philipa is precocial. Philipa is coseismic. Philipa is boastful. All counter things are sporadic. Furry, sporadic things are precocial. If Fairfax is boastful then Fairfax is sparkly. Fairfax is rutted.", "logic": "\nCounter(florencia)\nRutted(florencia)\nCounter(fairfax)\nPrecocial(fairfax)\nSparkly(fairfax)\nBoastful(fairfax)\nSporadic(chane)\nCounter(chane)\nSparkly(chane)\nRutted(chane)\nCoseismic(chane)\nBoastful(chane)\nSporadic(philipa)\nPrecocial(philipa)\nCoseismic(philipa)\nBoastful(philipa)\nforall x (Counter(x) -> Sporadic(x))\nforall x (Counter(x) and Sporadic(x) -> Precocial(x))\nBoastful(fairfax) -> Sparkly(fairfax)\n\nRutted(fairfax)\n\nRutted(fairfax) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Saraann is bifoliate. Saraann is briny. Marja is bifoliate. Marja is astatic. Marja is grownup. Marja is baffled. Candide is incorrupt. Candide is bifoliate. Candide is grownup. Candide is briny. Candide is nestled. Candide is baffled. Carlina is incorrupt. Carlina is astatic. Carlina is nestled. Carlina is baffled. All bifoliate things are incorrupt. Furry, incorrupt things are astatic. If Marja is baffled then Marja is grownup. Carlina is not bifoliate.", "logic": "\nBifoliate(saraann)\nBriny(saraann)\nBifoliate(marja)\nAstatic(marja)\nGrownup(marja)\nBaffled(marja)\nIncorrupt(candide)\nBifoliate(candide)\nGrownup(candide)\nBriny(candide)\nNestled(candide)\nBaffled(candide)\nIncorrupt(carlina)\nAstatic(carlina)\nNestled(carlina)\nBaffled(carlina)\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Incorrupt(x))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) and Incorrupt(x) -> Astatic(x))\nBaffled(marja) -> Grownup(marja)\n\nnot Bifoliate(carlina)\n\nnot Bifoliate(carlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Iago is blae. Iago is buckshee. Abagail is blae. Abagail is unreleased. Abagail is seraphical. Abagail is uncurled. Durand is defeasible. Durand is blae. Durand is seraphical. Durand is buckshee. Durand is metameric. Durand is uncurled. Mayda is defeasible. Mayda is unreleased. Mayda is metameric. Mayda is uncurled. All blae things are defeasible. Furry, defeasible things are unreleased. If Abagail is uncurled then Abagail is seraphical. Iago is seraphical.", "logic": "\nBlae(iago)\nBuckshee(iago)\nBlae(abagail)\nUnreleased(abagail)\nSeraphical(abagail)\nUncurled(abagail)\nDefeasible(durand)\nBlae(durand)\nSeraphical(durand)\nBuckshee(durand)\nMetameric(durand)\nUncurled(durand)\nDefeasible(mayda)\nUnreleased(mayda)\nMetameric(mayda)\nUncurled(mayda)\nforall x (Blae(x) -> Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Blae(x) and Defeasible(x) -> Unreleased(x))\nUncurled(abagail) -> Seraphical(abagail)\n\nSeraphical(iago)\n\nSeraphical(iago) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2307"} {"premises": "Huntlee is following. Huntlee is arrayed. Huntlee is not scruffy. Huntlee is backstage. Huntlee is certified. Huntlee is not rhymed. Huntlee is flying. Rog is scruffy. Rog is certified. Rog is flying. Big things are flying. If Rog is rhymed then Rog is certified. If Huntlee is not following then Huntlee is backstage. All certified, scruffy things are rhymed. If something is scruffy and rhymed then it is not backstage. All flying things are arrayed. If something is rhymed and not certified then it is arrayed. If Rog is scruffy and Rog is not arrayed then Rog is backstage. Rog is certified.", "logic": "\nFollowing(huntlee)\nArrayed(huntlee)\nnot Scruffy(huntlee)\nBackstage(huntlee)\nCertified(huntlee)\nnot Rhymed(huntlee)\nFlying(huntlee)\nScruffy(rog)\nCertified(rog)\nFlying(rog)\nforall x (Following(x) -> Flying(x))\nRhymed(rog) -> Certified(rog)\nnot Following(huntlee) -> Backstage(huntlee)\nforall x (Certified(x) and Scruffy(x) -> Rhymed(x))\nforall x (Scruffy(x) and Rhymed(x) -> not Backstage(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nforall x (Rhymed(x) and not Certified(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nScruffy(rog) and not Arrayed(rog) -> Backstage(rog)\n\nCertified(rog)\n\ntherefore Certified(rog)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "Nevin is corbelled. Nevin is ritardando. Nevin is not paternal. Nevin is ablated. Nevin is nonviolent. Nevin is not nacreous. Nevin is rhetorical. Chrysa is paternal. Chrysa is nonviolent. Chrysa is rhetorical. Big things are rhetorical. If Chrysa is nacreous then Chrysa is nonviolent. If Nevin is not corbelled then Nevin is ablated. All nonviolent, paternal things are nacreous. If something is paternal and nacreous then it is not ablated. All rhetorical things are ritardando. If something is nacreous and not nonviolent then it is ritardando. If Chrysa is paternal and Chrysa is not ritardando then Chrysa is ablated. Chrysa is not nonviolent.", "logic": "\nCorbelled(nevin)\nRitardando(nevin)\nnot Paternal(nevin)\nAblated(nevin)\nNonviolent(nevin)\nnot Nacreous(nevin)\nRhetorical(nevin)\nPaternal(chrysa)\nNonviolent(chrysa)\nRhetorical(chrysa)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Rhetorical(x))\nNacreous(chrysa) -> Nonviolent(chrysa)\nnot Corbelled(nevin) -> Ablated(nevin)\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) and Paternal(x) -> Nacreous(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) and Nacreous(x) -> not Ablated(x))\nforall x (Rhetorical(x) -> Ritardando(x))\nforall x (Nacreous(x) and not Nonviolent(x) -> Ritardando(x))\nPaternal(chrysa) and not Ritardando(chrysa) -> Ablated(chrysa)\n\nnot Nonviolent(chrysa)\n\ntherefore Nonviolent(chrysa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "Marjy is haemic. Marjy is clausal. Marjy is not seminal. Marjy is agitated. Marjy is schmalzy. Marjy is not collarless. Marjy is limbless. Abigael is seminal. Abigael is schmalzy. Abigael is limbless. Big things are limbless. If Abigael is collarless then Abigael is schmalzy. If Marjy is not haemic then Marjy is agitated. All schmalzy, seminal things are collarless. If something is seminal and collarless then it is not agitated. All limbless things are clausal. If something is collarless and not schmalzy then it is clausal. If Abigael is seminal and Abigael is not clausal then Abigael is agitated. Abigael is collarless.", "logic": "\nHaemic(marjy)\nClausal(marjy)\nnot Seminal(marjy)\nAgitated(marjy)\nSchmalzy(marjy)\nnot Collarless(marjy)\nLimbless(marjy)\nSeminal(abigael)\nSchmalzy(abigael)\nLimbless(abigael)\nforall x (Haemic(x) -> Limbless(x))\nCollarless(abigael) -> Schmalzy(abigael)\nnot Haemic(marjy) -> Agitated(marjy)\nforall x (Schmalzy(x) and Seminal(x) -> Collarless(x))\nforall x (Seminal(x) and Collarless(x) -> not Agitated(x))\nforall x (Limbless(x) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Collarless(x) and not Schmalzy(x) -> Clausal(x))\nSeminal(abigael) and not Clausal(abigael) -> Agitated(abigael)\n\nCollarless(abigael)\n\nSchmalzy(abigael) and Seminal(abigael) and forall x (Schmalzy(x) and Seminal(x) -> Collarless(x)) -> therefore Collarless(abigael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "Billi is obvious. Billi is aliquot. Billi is not libelous. Billi is ignoble. Billi is mutative. Billi is not atonic. Billi is sissyish. Evita is libelous. Evita is mutative. Evita is sissyish. Big things are sissyish. If Evita is atonic then Evita is mutative. If Billi is not obvious then Billi is ignoble. All mutative, libelous things are atonic. If something is libelous and atonic then it is not ignoble. All sissyish things are aliquot. If something is atonic and not mutative then it is aliquot. If Evita is libelous and Evita is not aliquot then Evita is ignoble. Evita is not atonic.", "logic": "\nObvious(billi)\nAliquot(billi)\nnot Libelous(billi)\nIgnoble(billi)\nMutative(billi)\nnot Atonic(billi)\nSissyish(billi)\nLibelous(evita)\nMutative(evita)\nSissyish(evita)\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Sissyish(x))\nAtonic(evita) -> Mutative(evita)\nnot Obvious(billi) -> Ignoble(billi)\nforall x (Mutative(x) and Libelous(x) -> Atonic(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) and Atonic(x) -> not Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Sissyish(x) -> Aliquot(x))\nforall x (Atonic(x) and not Mutative(x) -> Aliquot(x))\nLibelous(evita) and not Aliquot(evita) -> Ignoble(evita)\n\nnot Atonic(evita)\n\nMutative(evita) and Libelous(evita) and forall x (Mutative(x) and Libelous(x) -> Atonic(x)) -> therefore Atonic(evita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "Rem is indecent. Rem is supervised. Rem is not disgusting. Rem is scrambled. Rem is consummate. Rem is not unmatched. Rem is toothlike. Ravi is disgusting. Ravi is consummate. Ravi is toothlike. Big things are toothlike. If Ravi is unmatched then Ravi is consummate. If Rem is not indecent then Rem is scrambled. All consummate, disgusting things are unmatched. If something is disgusting and unmatched then it is not scrambled. All toothlike things are supervised. If something is unmatched and not consummate then it is supervised. If Ravi is disgusting and Ravi is not supervised then Ravi is scrambled. Ravi is not scrambled.", "logic": "\nIndecent(rem)\nSupervised(rem)\nnot Disgusting(rem)\nScrambled(rem)\nConsummate(rem)\nnot Unmatched(rem)\nToothlike(rem)\nDisgusting(ravi)\nConsummate(ravi)\nToothlike(ravi)\nforall x (Indecent(x) -> Toothlike(x))\nUnmatched(ravi) -> Consummate(ravi)\nnot Indecent(rem) -> Scrambled(rem)\nforall x (Consummate(x) and Disgusting(x) -> Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Disgusting(x) and Unmatched(x) -> not Scrambled(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Supervised(x))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) and not Consummate(x) -> Supervised(x))\nDisgusting(ravi) and not Supervised(ravi) -> Scrambled(ravi)\n\nnot Scrambled(ravi)\n\nConsummate(ravi) and Disgusting(ravi) and forall x (Consummate(x) and Disgusting(x) -> Unmatched(x)) -> therefore Unmatched(ravi) Disgusting(ravi) and Unmatched(ravi) and forall x (Disgusting(x) and Unmatched(x) -> not Scrambled(x)) -> therefore not Scrambled(ravi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "Maury is negro. Maury is monegasque. Maury is not yearly. Maury is dampish. Maury is maplelike. Maury is not ribbony. Maury is paraplegic. Barrie is yearly. Barrie is maplelike. Barrie is paraplegic. Big things are paraplegic. If Barrie is ribbony then Barrie is maplelike. If Maury is not negro then Maury is dampish. All maplelike, yearly things are ribbony. If something is yearly and ribbony then it is not dampish. All paraplegic things are monegasque. If something is ribbony and not maplelike then it is monegasque. If Barrie is yearly and Barrie is not monegasque then Barrie is dampish. Barrie is dampish.", "logic": "\nNegro(maury)\nMonegasque(maury)\nnot Yearly(maury)\nDampish(maury)\nMaplelike(maury)\nnot Ribbony(maury)\nParaplegic(maury)\nYearly(barrie)\nMaplelike(barrie)\nParaplegic(barrie)\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nRibbony(barrie) -> Maplelike(barrie)\nnot Negro(maury) -> Dampish(maury)\nforall x (Maplelike(x) and Yearly(x) -> Ribbony(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) and Ribbony(x) -> not Dampish(x))\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nforall x (Ribbony(x) and not Maplelike(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nYearly(barrie) and not Monegasque(barrie) -> Dampish(barrie)\n\nDampish(barrie)\n\nMaplelike(barrie) and Yearly(barrie) and forall x (Maplelike(x) and Yearly(x) -> Ribbony(x)) -> therefore Ribbony(barrie) Yearly(barrie) and Ribbony(barrie) and forall x (Yearly(x) and Ribbony(x) -> not Dampish(x)) -> therefore not Dampish(barrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "Marcille is slender. Marcille is sarcastic. Marcille is sizzling. Marcille is curvaceous. Marcille is tallish. Marcille is azotic. Marcille is breakable. Paul is slender. Paul is sarcastic. Paul is sizzling. Paul is curvaceous. Noble is slender. Noble is sizzling. Noble is curvaceous. Noble is tallish. All azotic, sizzling things are curvaceous. All sarcastic, azotic things are tallish. If something is sizzling then it is curvaceous. Kind, slender things are breakable. If Paul is curvaceous then Paul is tallish. If something is slender then it is sizzling. If something is slender then it is tallish. If Noble is curvaceous and Noble is breakable then Noble is sarcastic. Marcille is breakable.", "logic": "\nSlender(marcille)\nSarcastic(marcille)\nSizzling(marcille)\nCurvaceous(marcille)\nTallish(marcille)\nAzotic(marcille)\nBreakable(marcille)\nSlender(paul)\nSarcastic(paul)\nSizzling(paul)\nCurvaceous(paul)\nSlender(noble)\nSizzling(noble)\nCurvaceous(noble)\nTallish(noble)\nforall x (Azotic(x) and Sizzling(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\nforall x (Sarcastic(x) and Azotic(x) -> Tallish(x))\nforall x (Sizzling(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) and Slender(x) -> Breakable(x))\nCurvaceous(paul) -> Tallish(paul)\nforall x (Slender(x) -> Sizzling(x))\nforall x (Slender(x) -> Tallish(x))\nCurvaceous(noble) and Breakable(noble) -> Sarcastic(noble)\n\nBreakable(marcille)\n\ntherefore Breakable(marcille)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Joellyn is sullen. Joellyn is bavarian. Joellyn is clammy. Joellyn is gangly. Joellyn is antrorse. Joellyn is antheral. Joellyn is deflated. Temp is sullen. Temp is bavarian. Temp is clammy. Temp is gangly. Colette is sullen. Colette is clammy. Colette is gangly. Colette is antrorse. All antheral, clammy things are gangly. All bavarian, antheral things are antrorse. If something is clammy then it is gangly. Kind, sullen things are deflated. If Temp is gangly then Temp is antrorse. If something is sullen then it is clammy. If something is sullen then it is antrorse. If Colette is gangly and Colette is deflated then Colette is bavarian. Temp is not sullen.", "logic": "\nSullen(joellyn)\nBavarian(joellyn)\nClammy(joellyn)\nGangly(joellyn)\nAntrorse(joellyn)\nAntheral(joellyn)\nDeflated(joellyn)\nSullen(temp)\nBavarian(temp)\nClammy(temp)\nGangly(temp)\nSullen(colette)\nClammy(colette)\nGangly(colette)\nAntrorse(colette)\nforall x (Antheral(x) and Clammy(x) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Bavarian(x) and Antheral(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nforall x (Clammy(x) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Gangly(x) and Sullen(x) -> Deflated(x))\nGangly(temp) -> Antrorse(temp)\nforall x (Sullen(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Sullen(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nGangly(colette) and Deflated(colette) -> Bavarian(colette)\n\nnot Sullen(temp)\n\ntherefore Sullen(temp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Marten is lowered. Marten is phalangeal. Marten is unsuitable. Marten is manky. Marten is hairless. Marten is slushy. Marten is stationary. Aguinaldo is lowered. Aguinaldo is phalangeal. Aguinaldo is unsuitable. Aguinaldo is manky. Nikita is lowered. Nikita is unsuitable. Nikita is manky. Nikita is hairless. All slushy, unsuitable things are manky. All phalangeal, slushy things are hairless. If something is unsuitable then it is manky. Kind, lowered things are stationary. If Aguinaldo is manky then Aguinaldo is hairless. If something is lowered then it is unsuitable. If something is lowered then it is hairless. If Nikita is manky and Nikita is stationary then Nikita is phalangeal. Aguinaldo is hairless.", "logic": "\nLowered(marten)\nPhalangeal(marten)\nUnsuitable(marten)\nManky(marten)\nHairless(marten)\nSlushy(marten)\nStationary(marten)\nLowered(aguinaldo)\nPhalangeal(aguinaldo)\nUnsuitable(aguinaldo)\nManky(aguinaldo)\nLowered(nikita)\nUnsuitable(nikita)\nManky(nikita)\nHairless(nikita)\nforall x (Slushy(x) and Unsuitable(x) -> Manky(x))\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) and Slushy(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Manky(x))\nforall x (Manky(x) and Lowered(x) -> Stationary(x))\nManky(aguinaldo) -> Hairless(aguinaldo)\nforall x (Lowered(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Lowered(x) -> Hairless(x))\nManky(nikita) and Stationary(nikita) -> Phalangeal(nikita)\n\nHairless(aguinaldo)\n\nManky(aguinaldo) and Manky(aguinaldo) -> Hairless(aguinaldo) -> therefore Hairless(aguinaldo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Marie is corrosive. Marie is threescore. Marie is corvine. Marie is unopened. Marie is corbelled. Marie is abeyant. Marie is chaste. Shaylyn is corrosive. Shaylyn is threescore. Shaylyn is corvine. Shaylyn is unopened. Salmon is corrosive. Salmon is corvine. Salmon is unopened. Salmon is corbelled. All abeyant, corvine things are unopened. All threescore, abeyant things are corbelled. If something is corvine then it is unopened. Kind, corrosive things are chaste. If Shaylyn is unopened then Shaylyn is corbelled. If something is corrosive then it is corvine. If something is corrosive then it is corbelled. If Salmon is unopened and Salmon is chaste then Salmon is threescore. Shaylyn is not corbelled.", "logic": "\nCorrosive(marie)\nThreescore(marie)\nCorvine(marie)\nUnopened(marie)\nCorbelled(marie)\nAbeyant(marie)\nChaste(marie)\nCorrosive(shaylyn)\nThreescore(shaylyn)\nCorvine(shaylyn)\nUnopened(shaylyn)\nCorrosive(salmon)\nCorvine(salmon)\nUnopened(salmon)\nCorbelled(salmon)\nforall x (Abeyant(x) and Corvine(x) -> Unopened(x))\nforall x (Threescore(x) and Abeyant(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Corvine(x) -> Unopened(x))\nforall x (Unopened(x) and Corrosive(x) -> Chaste(x))\nUnopened(shaylyn) -> Corbelled(shaylyn)\nforall x (Corrosive(x) -> Corvine(x))\nforall x (Corrosive(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nUnopened(salmon) and Chaste(salmon) -> Threescore(salmon)\n\nnot Corbelled(shaylyn)\n\nUnopened(shaylyn) and Unopened(shaylyn) -> Corbelled(shaylyn) -> therefore Corbelled(shaylyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Lira is licensed. Lira is fervid. Lira is reflective. Lira is boskopoid. Lira is clumsy. Lira is pellucid. Lira is sidereal. Lindy is licensed. Lindy is fervid. Lindy is reflective. Lindy is boskopoid. Doe is licensed. Doe is reflective. Doe is boskopoid. Doe is clumsy. All pellucid, reflective things are boskopoid. All fervid, pellucid things are clumsy. If something is reflective then it is boskopoid. Kind, licensed things are sidereal. If Lindy is boskopoid then Lindy is clumsy. If something is licensed then it is reflective. If something is licensed then it is clumsy. If Doe is boskopoid and Doe is sidereal then Doe is fervid. Doe is fervid.", "logic": "\nLicensed(lira)\nFervid(lira)\nReflective(lira)\nBoskopoid(lira)\nClumsy(lira)\nPellucid(lira)\nSidereal(lira)\nLicensed(lindy)\nFervid(lindy)\nReflective(lindy)\nBoskopoid(lindy)\nLicensed(doe)\nReflective(doe)\nBoskopoid(doe)\nClumsy(doe)\nforall x (Pellucid(x) and Reflective(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Fervid(x) and Pellucid(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Reflective(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) and Licensed(x) -> Sidereal(x))\nBoskopoid(lindy) -> Clumsy(lindy)\nforall x (Licensed(x) -> Reflective(x))\nforall x (Licensed(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nBoskopoid(doe) and Sidereal(doe) -> Fervid(doe)\n\nFervid(doe)\n\nBoskopoid(doe) and Licensed(doe) and forall x (Boskopoid(x) and Licensed(x) -> Sidereal(x)) -> therefore Sidereal(doe) Boskopoid(doe) and Sidereal(doe) and Boskopoid(doe) and Sidereal(doe) -> Fervid(doe) -> therefore Fervid(doe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Natalina is unmatched. Natalina is bentonitic. Natalina is precooked. Natalina is arty. Natalina is drunken. Natalina is semidark. Natalina is fettered. Luelle is unmatched. Luelle is bentonitic. Luelle is precooked. Luelle is arty. Jessie is unmatched. Jessie is precooked. Jessie is arty. Jessie is drunken. All semidark, precooked things are arty. All bentonitic, semidark things are drunken. If something is precooked then it is arty. Kind, unmatched things are fettered. If Luelle is arty then Luelle is drunken. If something is unmatched then it is precooked. If something is unmatched then it is drunken. If Jessie is arty and Jessie is fettered then Jessie is bentonitic. Jessie is not bentonitic.", "logic": "\nUnmatched(natalina)\nBentonitic(natalina)\nPrecooked(natalina)\nArty(natalina)\nDrunken(natalina)\nSemidark(natalina)\nFettered(natalina)\nUnmatched(luelle)\nBentonitic(luelle)\nPrecooked(luelle)\nArty(luelle)\nUnmatched(jessie)\nPrecooked(jessie)\nArty(jessie)\nDrunken(jessie)\nforall x (Semidark(x) and Precooked(x) -> Arty(x))\nforall x (Bentonitic(x) and Semidark(x) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Precooked(x) -> Arty(x))\nforall x (Arty(x) and Unmatched(x) -> Fettered(x))\nArty(luelle) -> Drunken(luelle)\nforall x (Unmatched(x) -> Precooked(x))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) -> Drunken(x))\nArty(jessie) and Fettered(jessie) -> Bentonitic(jessie)\n\nnot Bentonitic(jessie)\n\nArty(jessie) and Unmatched(jessie) and forall x (Arty(x) and Unmatched(x) -> Fettered(x)) -> therefore Fettered(jessie) Arty(jessie) and Fettered(jessie) and Arty(jessie) and Fettered(jessie) -> Bentonitic(jessie) -> therefore Bentonitic(jessie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Faith is sharpened. Faith is hipless. Faith is affordable. Faith is unbalanced. Faith is worsening. Faith is undatable. Faith is homocercal. Retha is sharpened. Retha is hipless. Retha is affordable. Retha is unbalanced. Minna is sharpened. Minna is affordable. Minna is unbalanced. Minna is worsening. All undatable, affordable things are unbalanced. All hipless, undatable things are worsening. If something is affordable then it is unbalanced. Kind, sharpened things are homocercal. If Retha is unbalanced then Retha is worsening. If something is sharpened then it is affordable. If something is sharpened then it is worsening. If Minna is unbalanced and Minna is homocercal then Minna is hipless. Retha is not undatable.", "logic": "\nSharpened(faith)\nHipless(faith)\nAffordable(faith)\nUnbalanced(faith)\nWorsening(faith)\nUndatable(faith)\nHomocercal(faith)\nSharpened(retha)\nHipless(retha)\nAffordable(retha)\nUnbalanced(retha)\nSharpened(minna)\nAffordable(minna)\nUnbalanced(minna)\nWorsening(minna)\nforall x (Undatable(x) and Affordable(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Hipless(x) and Undatable(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Affordable(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) and Sharpened(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nUnbalanced(retha) -> Worsening(retha)\nforall x (Sharpened(x) -> Affordable(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) -> Worsening(x))\nUnbalanced(minna) and Homocercal(minna) -> Hipless(minna)\n\nnot Undatable(retha)\n\nnot Undatable(retha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Bryce is monumental. Bryce is orbiculate. Bryce is merited. Bryce is unsavory. Bryce is ingenious. Bryce is otherwise. Bryce is mellowed. Douggie is monumental. Douggie is orbiculate. Douggie is merited. Douggie is unsavory. Lonnie is monumental. Lonnie is merited. Lonnie is unsavory. Lonnie is ingenious. All otherwise, merited things are unsavory. All orbiculate, otherwise things are ingenious. If something is merited then it is unsavory. Kind, monumental things are mellowed. If Douggie is unsavory then Douggie is ingenious. If something is monumental then it is merited. If something is monumental then it is ingenious. If Lonnie is unsavory and Lonnie is mellowed then Lonnie is orbiculate. Lonnie is otherwise.", "logic": "\nMonumental(bryce)\nOrbiculate(bryce)\nMerited(bryce)\nUnsavory(bryce)\nIngenious(bryce)\nOtherwise(bryce)\nMellowed(bryce)\nMonumental(douggie)\nOrbiculate(douggie)\nMerited(douggie)\nUnsavory(douggie)\nMonumental(lonnie)\nMerited(lonnie)\nUnsavory(lonnie)\nIngenious(lonnie)\nforall x (Otherwise(x) and Merited(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and Otherwise(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Merited(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Unsavory(x) and Monumental(x) -> Mellowed(x))\nUnsavory(douggie) -> Ingenious(douggie)\nforall x (Monumental(x) -> Merited(x))\nforall x (Monumental(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nUnsavory(lonnie) and Mellowed(lonnie) -> Orbiculate(lonnie)\n\nOtherwise(lonnie)\n\nOtherwise(lonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-386"} {"premises": "Nat is bimetallic. Nat is suppressed. Nat is not untimbered. Nat is patellar. Gilbert is hebrew. Corina is bimetallic. Corina is suppressed. Corina is patellar. Corina is hebrew. Corina is confutable. Laverne is lucid. Laverne is suppressed. Laverne is untimbered. Laverne is patellar. Laverne is hebrew. Cold, hebrew things are suppressed. If something is patellar then it is suppressed. Quiet, untimbered things are suppressed. Smart things are suppressed. If something is lucid and not untimbered then it is patellar. If something is hebrew then it is patellar. If something is confutable and not untimbered then it is hebrew. If something is suppressed and not lucid then it is hebrew. Laverne is untimbered.", "logic": "\nBimetallic(nat)\nSuppressed(nat)\nnot Untimbered(nat)\nPatellar(nat)\nHebrew(gilbert)\nBimetallic(corina)\nSuppressed(corina)\nPatellar(corina)\nHebrew(corina)\nConfutable(corina)\nLucid(laverne)\nSuppressed(laverne)\nUntimbered(laverne)\nPatellar(laverne)\nHebrew(laverne)\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Suppressed(x))\nforall x (Patellar(x) -> Suppressed(x))\nforall x (Patellar(x) and Untimbered(x) -> Suppressed(x))\nforall x (Confutable(x) -> Suppressed(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) and not Untimbered(x) -> Patellar(x))\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Patellar(x))\nforall x (Confutable(x) and not Untimbered(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nforall x (Suppressed(x) and not Lucid(x) -> Hebrew(x))\n\nUntimbered(laverne)\n\ntherefore Untimbered(laverne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Aurora is sexy. Aurora is honied. Aurora is not tunisian. Aurora is satanic. Dustin is cymose. Teane is sexy. Teane is honied. Teane is satanic. Teane is cymose. Teane is saline. Veda is monacan. Veda is honied. Veda is tunisian. Veda is satanic. Veda is cymose. Cold, cymose things are honied. If something is satanic then it is honied. Quiet, tunisian things are honied. Smart things are honied. If something is monacan and not tunisian then it is satanic. If something is cymose then it is satanic. If something is saline and not tunisian then it is cymose. If something is honied and not monacan then it is cymose. Teane is not honied.", "logic": "\nSexy(aurora)\nHonied(aurora)\nnot Tunisian(aurora)\nSatanic(aurora)\nCymose(dustin)\nSexy(teane)\nHonied(teane)\nSatanic(teane)\nCymose(teane)\nSaline(teane)\nMonacan(veda)\nHonied(veda)\nTunisian(veda)\nSatanic(veda)\nCymose(veda)\nforall x (Sexy(x) and Cymose(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Satanic(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Satanic(x) and Tunisian(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Saline(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Monacan(x) and not Tunisian(x) -> Satanic(x))\nforall x (Cymose(x) -> Satanic(x))\nforall x (Saline(x) and not Tunisian(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Honied(x) and not Monacan(x) -> Cymose(x))\n\nnot Honied(teane)\n\ntherefore Honied(teane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Laurella is marauding. Laurella is excused. Laurella is not overbusy. Laurella is clogging. Worthy is exotic. Ranna is marauding. Ranna is excused. Ranna is clogging. Ranna is exotic. Ranna is intestate. Hally is burrlike. Hally is excused. Hally is overbusy. Hally is clogging. Hally is exotic. Cold, exotic things are excused. If something is clogging then it is excused. Quiet, overbusy things are excused. Smart things are excused. If something is burrlike and not overbusy then it is clogging. If something is exotic then it is clogging. If something is intestate and not overbusy then it is exotic. If something is excused and not burrlike then it is exotic. Worthy is clogging.", "logic": "\nMarauding(laurella)\nExcused(laurella)\nnot Overbusy(laurella)\nClogging(laurella)\nExotic(worthy)\nMarauding(ranna)\nExcused(ranna)\nClogging(ranna)\nExotic(ranna)\nIntestate(ranna)\nBurrlike(hally)\nExcused(hally)\nOverbusy(hally)\nClogging(hally)\nExotic(hally)\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Exotic(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Clogging(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Clogging(x) and Overbusy(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Intestate(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) and not Overbusy(x) -> Clogging(x))\nforall x (Exotic(x) -> Clogging(x))\nforall x (Intestate(x) and not Overbusy(x) -> Exotic(x))\nforall x (Excused(x) and not Burrlike(x) -> Exotic(x))\n\nClogging(worthy)\n\nExotic(worthy) and forall x (Exotic(x) -> Clogging(x)) -> therefore Clogging(worthy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Theobald is crapulous. Theobald is benumbed. Theobald is not roofed. Theobald is warmed. Ryan is unpunctual. Phillipp is crapulous. Phillipp is benumbed. Phillipp is warmed. Phillipp is unpunctual. Phillipp is organismal. Emmalynne is paramount. Emmalynne is benumbed. Emmalynne is roofed. Emmalynne is warmed. Emmalynne is unpunctual. Cold, unpunctual things are benumbed. If something is warmed then it is benumbed. Quiet, roofed things are benumbed. Smart things are benumbed. If something is paramount and not roofed then it is warmed. If something is unpunctual then it is warmed. If something is organismal and not roofed then it is unpunctual. If something is benumbed and not paramount then it is unpunctual. Ryan is not warmed.", "logic": "\nCrapulous(theobald)\nBenumbed(theobald)\nnot Roofed(theobald)\nWarmed(theobald)\nUnpunctual(ryan)\nCrapulous(phillipp)\nBenumbed(phillipp)\nWarmed(phillipp)\nUnpunctual(phillipp)\nOrganismal(phillipp)\nParamount(emmalynne)\nBenumbed(emmalynne)\nRoofed(emmalynne)\nWarmed(emmalynne)\nUnpunctual(emmalynne)\nforall x (Crapulous(x) and Unpunctual(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) and Roofed(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Paramount(x) and not Roofed(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Organismal(x) and not Roofed(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\nforall x (Benumbed(x) and not Paramount(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\n\nnot Warmed(ryan)\n\nUnpunctual(ryan) and forall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Warmed(x)) -> therefore Warmed(ryan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Cori is vanished. Cori is accurst. Cori is not sunset. Cori is upraised. Lani is dermic. Guillema is vanished. Guillema is accurst. Guillema is upraised. Guillema is dermic. Guillema is denary. Patricio is biaural. Patricio is accurst. Patricio is sunset. Patricio is upraised. Patricio is dermic. Cold, dermic things are accurst. If something is upraised then it is accurst. Quiet, sunset things are accurst. Smart things are accurst. If something is biaural and not sunset then it is upraised. If something is dermic then it is upraised. If something is denary and not sunset then it is dermic. If something is accurst and not biaural then it is dermic. Lani is accurst.", "logic": "\nVanished(cori)\nAccurst(cori)\nnot Sunset(cori)\nUpraised(cori)\nDermic(lani)\nVanished(guillema)\nAccurst(guillema)\nUpraised(guillema)\nDermic(guillema)\nDenary(guillema)\nBiaural(patricio)\nAccurst(patricio)\nSunset(patricio)\nUpraised(patricio)\nDermic(patricio)\nforall x (Vanished(x) and Dermic(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) and Sunset(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Denary(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) and not Sunset(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Denary(x) and not Sunset(x) -> Dermic(x))\nforall x (Accurst(x) and not Biaural(x) -> Dermic(x))\n\nAccurst(lani)\n\nDermic(lani) and forall x (Dermic(x) -> Upraised(x)) -> therefore Upraised(lani) Upraised(lani) and forall x (Upraised(x) -> Accurst(x)) -> therefore Accurst(lani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Ilise is bewitched. Ilise is involved. Ilise is not corpulent. Ilise is roundabout. Misti is amateur. Erda is bewitched. Erda is involved. Erda is roundabout. Erda is amateur. Erda is paperlike. Pip is flowery. Pip is involved. Pip is corpulent. Pip is roundabout. Pip is amateur. Cold, amateur things are involved. If something is roundabout then it is involved. Quiet, corpulent things are involved. Smart things are involved. If something is flowery and not corpulent then it is roundabout. If something is amateur then it is roundabout. If something is paperlike and not corpulent then it is amateur. If something is involved and not flowery then it is amateur. Misti is not involved.", "logic": "\nBewitched(ilise)\nInvolved(ilise)\nnot Corpulent(ilise)\nRoundabout(ilise)\nAmateur(misti)\nBewitched(erda)\nInvolved(erda)\nRoundabout(erda)\nAmateur(erda)\nPaperlike(erda)\nFlowery(pip)\nInvolved(pip)\nCorpulent(pip)\nRoundabout(pip)\nAmateur(pip)\nforall x (Bewitched(x) and Amateur(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Roundabout(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Roundabout(x) and Corpulent(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Paperlike(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Flowery(x) and not Corpulent(x) -> Roundabout(x))\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Roundabout(x))\nforall x (Paperlike(x) and not Corpulent(x) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) and not Flowery(x) -> Amateur(x))\n\nnot Involved(misti)\n\nAmateur(misti) and forall x (Amateur(x) -> Roundabout(x)) -> therefore Roundabout(misti) Roundabout(misti) and forall x (Roundabout(x) -> Involved(x)) -> therefore Involved(misti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Franklin is nuptial. Franklin is mulish. Franklin is not cockamamy. Franklin is prisonlike. Lust is wheezy. Pippy is nuptial. Pippy is mulish. Pippy is prisonlike. Pippy is wheezy. Pippy is gainly. Helsa is activating. Helsa is mulish. Helsa is cockamamy. Helsa is prisonlike. Helsa is wheezy. Cold, wheezy things are mulish. If something is prisonlike then it is mulish. Quiet, cockamamy things are mulish. Smart things are mulish. If something is activating and not cockamamy then it is prisonlike. If something is wheezy then it is prisonlike. If something is gainly and not cockamamy then it is wheezy. If something is mulish and not activating then it is wheezy. Franklin is not wheezy.", "logic": "\nNuptial(franklin)\nMulish(franklin)\nnot Cockamamy(franklin)\nPrisonlike(franklin)\nWheezy(lust)\nNuptial(pippy)\nMulish(pippy)\nPrisonlike(pippy)\nWheezy(pippy)\nGainly(pippy)\nActivating(helsa)\nMulish(helsa)\nCockamamy(helsa)\nPrisonlike(helsa)\nWheezy(helsa)\nforall x (Nuptial(x) and Wheezy(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) and Cockamamy(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) and not Cockamamy(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Gainly(x) and not Cockamamy(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) and not Activating(x) -> Wheezy(x))\n\nnot Wheezy(franklin)\n\nforall x (Gainly(x) and not Cockamamy(x) -> Wheezy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Ralf is petrous. Ralf is boggy. Ralf is not defective. Ralf is equipoised. Barbee is aligned. Fern is petrous. Fern is boggy. Fern is equipoised. Fern is aligned. Fern is ritzy. Jocelyne is bursal. Jocelyne is boggy. Jocelyne is defective. Jocelyne is equipoised. Jocelyne is aligned. Cold, aligned things are boggy. If something is equipoised then it is boggy. Quiet, defective things are boggy. Smart things are boggy. If something is bursal and not defective then it is equipoised. If something is aligned then it is equipoised. If something is ritzy and not defective then it is aligned. If something is boggy and not bursal then it is aligned. Jocelyne is ritzy.", "logic": "\nPetrous(ralf)\nBoggy(ralf)\nnot Defective(ralf)\nEquipoised(ralf)\nAligned(barbee)\nPetrous(fern)\nBoggy(fern)\nEquipoised(fern)\nAligned(fern)\nRitzy(fern)\nBursal(jocelyne)\nBoggy(jocelyne)\nDefective(jocelyne)\nEquipoised(jocelyne)\nAligned(jocelyne)\nforall x (Petrous(x) and Aligned(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) and Defective(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Ritzy(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Bursal(x) and not Defective(x) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Aligned(x) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Ritzy(x) and not Defective(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Boggy(x) and not Bursal(x) -> Aligned(x))\n\nRitzy(jocelyne)\n\nRitzy(jocelyne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Coletta is suchlike. Coletta is mucoidal. Coletta is not lactogenic. Coletta is saintlike. Devan is sour. Betteanne is suchlike. Betteanne is mucoidal. Betteanne is saintlike. Betteanne is sour. Betteanne is amalgamate. Rhianna is cubiform. Rhianna is mucoidal. Rhianna is lactogenic. Rhianna is saintlike. Rhianna is sour. Cold, sour things are mucoidal. If something is saintlike then it is mucoidal. Quiet, lactogenic things are mucoidal. Smart things are mucoidal. If something is cubiform and not lactogenic then it is saintlike. If something is sour then it is saintlike. If something is amalgamate and not lactogenic then it is sour. If something is mucoidal and not cubiform then it is sour. Devan is not cubiform.", "logic": "\nSuchlike(coletta)\nMucoidal(coletta)\nnot Lactogenic(coletta)\nSaintlike(coletta)\nSour(devan)\nSuchlike(betteanne)\nMucoidal(betteanne)\nSaintlike(betteanne)\nSour(betteanne)\nAmalgamate(betteanne)\nCubiform(rhianna)\nMucoidal(rhianna)\nLactogenic(rhianna)\nSaintlike(rhianna)\nSour(rhianna)\nforall x (Suchlike(x) and Sour(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Saintlike(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Saintlike(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Cubiform(x) and not Lactogenic(x) -> Saintlike(x))\nforall x (Sour(x) -> Saintlike(x))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x) and not Lactogenic(x) -> Sour(x))\nforall x (Mucoidal(x) and not Cubiform(x) -> Sour(x))\n\nnot Cubiform(devan)\n\nnot Cubiform(devan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Chet is floodlit. Chet is meshuga. Chet is not guided. Chet is enjoyable. Maridel is stubbled. Yoko is floodlit. Yoko is meshuga. Yoko is enjoyable. Yoko is stubbled. Yoko is zygomatic. Minny is matted. Minny is meshuga. Minny is guided. Minny is enjoyable. Minny is stubbled. Cold, stubbled things are meshuga. If something is enjoyable then it is meshuga. Quiet, guided things are meshuga. Smart things are meshuga. If something is matted and not guided then it is enjoyable. If something is stubbled then it is enjoyable. If something is zygomatic and not guided then it is stubbled. If something is meshuga and not matted then it is stubbled. Chet is zygomatic.", "logic": "\nFloodlit(chet)\nMeshuga(chet)\nnot Guided(chet)\nEnjoyable(chet)\nStubbled(maridel)\nFloodlit(yoko)\nMeshuga(yoko)\nEnjoyable(yoko)\nStubbled(yoko)\nZygomatic(yoko)\nMatted(minny)\nMeshuga(minny)\nGuided(minny)\nEnjoyable(minny)\nStubbled(minny)\nforall x (Floodlit(x) and Stubbled(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) and Guided(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Matted(x) and not Guided(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and not Guided(x) -> Stubbled(x))\nforall x (Meshuga(x) and not Matted(x) -> Stubbled(x))\n\nZygomatic(chet)\n\nZygomatic(chet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Daphna is stately. Daphna is collagenic. Daphna is not sessile. Daphna is beery. Doyle is advisory. Jordanna is stately. Jordanna is collagenic. Jordanna is beery. Jordanna is advisory. Jordanna is thudding. Claus is retinal. Claus is collagenic. Claus is sessile. Claus is beery. Claus is advisory. Cold, advisory things are collagenic. If something is beery then it is collagenic. Quiet, sessile things are collagenic. Smart things are collagenic. If something is retinal and not sessile then it is beery. If something is advisory then it is beery. If something is thudding and not sessile then it is advisory. If something is collagenic and not retinal then it is advisory. Jordanna is not sessile.", "logic": "\nStately(daphna)\nCollagenic(daphna)\nnot Sessile(daphna)\nBeery(daphna)\nAdvisory(doyle)\nStately(jordanna)\nCollagenic(jordanna)\nBeery(jordanna)\nAdvisory(jordanna)\nThudding(jordanna)\nRetinal(claus)\nCollagenic(claus)\nSessile(claus)\nBeery(claus)\nAdvisory(claus)\nforall x (Stately(x) and Advisory(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) and Sessile(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Thudding(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Retinal(x) and not Sessile(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Advisory(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Thudding(x) and not Sessile(x) -> Advisory(x))\nforall x (Collagenic(x) and not Retinal(x) -> Advisory(x))\n\nnot Sessile(jordanna)\n\nnot Sessile(jordanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Kaye is roughdried. Kaye is pyrogallic. Kaye is not mossy. Kaye is postictal. Piper is psychotic. Kissee is roughdried. Kissee is pyrogallic. Kissee is postictal. Kissee is psychotic. Kissee is bibulous. Jaine is unrelaxed. Jaine is pyrogallic. Jaine is mossy. Jaine is postictal. Jaine is psychotic. Cold, psychotic things are pyrogallic. If something is postictal then it is pyrogallic. Quiet, mossy things are pyrogallic. Smart things are pyrogallic. If something is unrelaxed and not mossy then it is postictal. If something is psychotic then it is postictal. If something is bibulous and not mossy then it is psychotic. If something is pyrogallic and not unrelaxed then it is psychotic. Jaine is roughdried.", "logic": "\nRoughdried(kaye)\nPyrogallic(kaye)\nnot Mossy(kaye)\nPostictal(kaye)\nPsychotic(piper)\nRoughdried(kissee)\nPyrogallic(kissee)\nPostictal(kissee)\nPsychotic(kissee)\nBibulous(kissee)\nUnrelaxed(jaine)\nPyrogallic(jaine)\nMossy(jaine)\nPostictal(jaine)\nPsychotic(jaine)\nforall x (Roughdried(x) and Psychotic(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Postictal(x) and Mossy(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) and not Mossy(x) -> Postictal(x))\nforall x (Psychotic(x) -> Postictal(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) and not Mossy(x) -> Psychotic(x))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) and not Unrelaxed(x) -> Psychotic(x))\n\nRoughdried(jaine)\n\nRoughdried(jaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1815"} {"premises": "Kerry is tragic. Kerry is bimanual. Kerry is cannibalic. Mirna is unsolved. Mirna is novel. Mirna is cannibalic. Jannel is novel. Flem is novel. Flem is hallowed. Flem is tragic. If someone is bimanual and not novel then they are tragic. If someone is novel and cannibalic then they are hallowed. All unsolved, hallowed people are debile. Jannel is novel.", "logic": "\nTragic(kerry)\nBimanual(kerry)\nCannibalic(kerry)\nUnsolved(mirna)\nNovel(mirna)\nCannibalic(mirna)\nNovel(jannel)\nNovel(flem)\nHallowed(flem)\nTragic(flem)\nforall x (Bimanual(x) and not Novel(x) -> Tragic(x))\nforall x (Novel(x) and Cannibalic(x) -> Hallowed(x))\nforall x (Unsolved(x) and Hallowed(x) -> Debile(x))\n\nNovel(jannel)\n\ntherefore Novel(jannel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Koressa is unbarreled. Koressa is verbatim. Koressa is mediocre. Marietta is crescendo. Marietta is puberulent. Marietta is mediocre. Arlie is puberulent. Mellisent is puberulent. Mellisent is vinaceous. Mellisent is unbarreled. If someone is verbatim and not puberulent then they are unbarreled. If someone is puberulent and mediocre then they are vinaceous. All crescendo, vinaceous people are precise. Koressa is not mediocre.", "logic": "\nUnbarreled(koressa)\nVerbatim(koressa)\nMediocre(koressa)\nCrescendo(marietta)\nPuberulent(marietta)\nMediocre(marietta)\nPuberulent(arlie)\nPuberulent(mellisent)\nVinaceous(mellisent)\nUnbarreled(mellisent)\nforall x (Verbatim(x) and not Puberulent(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\nforall x (Puberulent(x) and Mediocre(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\nforall x (Crescendo(x) and Vinaceous(x) -> Precise(x))\n\nnot Mediocre(koressa)\n\ntherefore Mediocre(koressa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Allis is crowning. Allis is stifled. Allis is volcanic. Adam is tenderized. Adam is nescient. Adam is volcanic. Timotheus is nescient. Hilliard is nescient. Hilliard is praiseful. Hilliard is crowning. If someone is stifled and not nescient then they are crowning. If someone is nescient and volcanic then they are praiseful. All tenderized, praiseful people are noiseless. Adam is praiseful.", "logic": "\nCrowning(allis)\nStifled(allis)\nVolcanic(allis)\nTenderized(adam)\nNescient(adam)\nVolcanic(adam)\nNescient(timotheus)\nNescient(hilliard)\nPraiseful(hilliard)\nCrowning(hilliard)\nforall x (Stifled(x) and not Nescient(x) -> Crowning(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) and Volcanic(x) -> Praiseful(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) and Praiseful(x) -> Noiseless(x))\n\nPraiseful(adam)\n\nNescient(adam) and Volcanic(adam) and forall x (Nescient(x) and Volcanic(x) -> Praiseful(x)) -> therefore Praiseful(adam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Don is meritable. Don is genic. Don is benighted. Fan is slapdash. Fan is trusted. Fan is benighted. Latia is trusted. Marian is trusted. Marian is chancy. Marian is meritable. If someone is genic and not trusted then they are meritable. If someone is trusted and benighted then they are chancy. All slapdash, chancy people are neotenous. Fan is not chancy.", "logic": "\nMeritable(don)\nGenic(don)\nBenighted(don)\nSlapdash(fan)\nTrusted(fan)\nBenighted(fan)\nTrusted(latia)\nTrusted(marian)\nChancy(marian)\nMeritable(marian)\nforall x (Genic(x) and not Trusted(x) -> Meritable(x))\nforall x (Trusted(x) and Benighted(x) -> Chancy(x))\nforall x (Slapdash(x) and Chancy(x) -> Neotenous(x))\n\nnot Chancy(fan)\n\nTrusted(fan) and Benighted(fan) and forall x (Trusted(x) and Benighted(x) -> Chancy(x)) -> therefore Chancy(fan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Wash is cased. Wash is botanical. Wash is slubbed. Nevil is scalloped. Nevil is tyrannous. Nevil is slubbed. Trina is tyrannous. Antonino is tyrannous. Antonino is broadleaf. Antonino is cased. If someone is botanical and not tyrannous then they are cased. If someone is tyrannous and slubbed then they are broadleaf. All scalloped, broadleaf people are erect. Nevil is erect.", "logic": "\nCased(wash)\nBotanical(wash)\nSlubbed(wash)\nScalloped(nevil)\nTyrannous(nevil)\nSlubbed(nevil)\nTyrannous(trina)\nTyrannous(antonino)\nBroadleaf(antonino)\nCased(antonino)\nforall x (Botanical(x) and not Tyrannous(x) -> Cased(x))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Broadleaf(x) -> Erect(x))\n\nErect(nevil)\n\nTyrannous(nevil) and Slubbed(nevil) and forall x (Tyrannous(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Broadleaf(x)) -> therefore Broadleaf(nevil) Scalloped(nevil) and Broadleaf(nevil) and forall x (Scalloped(x) and Broadleaf(x) -> Erect(x)) -> therefore Erect(nevil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Silas is irish. Silas is cross. Silas is sinuate. Rowland is motivated. Rowland is dorian. Rowland is sinuate. Hillel is dorian. Artur is dorian. Artur is diminished. Artur is irish. If someone is cross and not dorian then they are irish. If someone is dorian and sinuate then they are diminished. All motivated, diminished people are accretive. Rowland is not accretive.", "logic": "\nIrish(silas)\nCross(silas)\nSinuate(silas)\nMotivated(rowland)\nDorian(rowland)\nSinuate(rowland)\nDorian(hillel)\nDorian(artur)\nDiminished(artur)\nIrish(artur)\nforall x (Cross(x) and not Dorian(x) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Dorian(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Diminished(x))\nforall x (Motivated(x) and Diminished(x) -> Accretive(x))\n\nnot Accretive(rowland)\n\nDorian(rowland) and Sinuate(rowland) and forall x (Dorian(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Diminished(x)) -> therefore Diminished(rowland) Motivated(rowland) and Diminished(rowland) and forall x (Motivated(x) and Diminished(x) -> Accretive(x)) -> therefore Accretive(rowland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Aeriell is cityfied. Aeriell is nonsexual. Aeriell is freelance. Valina is positive. Valina is genic. Valina is freelance. Etty is genic. Rubina is genic. Rubina is detergent. Rubina is cityfied. If someone is nonsexual and not genic then they are cityfied. If someone is genic and freelance then they are detergent. All positive, detergent people are chic. Aeriell is not chic.", "logic": "\nCityfied(aeriell)\nNonsexual(aeriell)\nFreelance(aeriell)\nPositive(valina)\nGenic(valina)\nFreelance(valina)\nGenic(etty)\nGenic(rubina)\nDetergent(rubina)\nCityfied(rubina)\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) and not Genic(x) -> Cityfied(x))\nforall x (Genic(x) and Freelance(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Positive(x) and Detergent(x) -> Chic(x))\n\nnot Chic(aeriell)\n\nforall x (Positive(x) and Detergent(x) -> Chic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Amalita is crinoid. Amalita is acervate. Amalita is rank. Ceciley is slight. Ceciley is rounded. Ceciley is rank. Connor is rounded. Dina is rounded. Dina is unborn. Dina is crinoid. If someone is acervate and not rounded then they are crinoid. If someone is rounded and rank then they are unborn. All slight, unborn people are mannerly. Connor is mannerly.", "logic": "\nCrinoid(amalita)\nAcervate(amalita)\nRank(amalita)\nSlight(ceciley)\nRounded(ceciley)\nRank(ceciley)\nRounded(connor)\nRounded(dina)\nUnborn(dina)\nCrinoid(dina)\nforall x (Acervate(x) and not Rounded(x) -> Crinoid(x))\nforall x (Rounded(x) and Rank(x) -> Unborn(x))\nforall x (Slight(x) and Unborn(x) -> Mannerly(x))\n\nMannerly(connor)\n\nforall x (Slight(x) and Unborn(x) -> Mannerly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Madelaine is salvific. Madelaine is barehanded. Madelaine is punishable. Merline is inbred. Merline is mensural. Merline is punishable. Phineas is mensural. Charo is mensural. Charo is unfitting. Charo is salvific. If someone is barehanded and not mensural then they are salvific. If someone is mensural and punishable then they are unfitting. All inbred, unfitting people are attendant. Madelaine is not unfitting.", "logic": "\nSalvific(madelaine)\nBarehanded(madelaine)\nPunishable(madelaine)\nInbred(merline)\nMensural(merline)\nPunishable(merline)\nMensural(phineas)\nMensural(charo)\nUnfitting(charo)\nSalvific(charo)\nforall x (Barehanded(x) and not Mensural(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Mensural(x) and Punishable(x) -> Unfitting(x))\nforall x (Inbred(x) and Unfitting(x) -> Attendant(x))\n\nnot Unfitting(madelaine)\n\nforall x (Mensural(x) and Punishable(x) -> Unfitting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Paige is braless. Paige is candescent. Paige is grisly. Casie is rushlike. Casie is shabby. Casie is grisly. Serena is shabby. Bendite is shabby. Bendite is bluff. Bendite is braless. If someone is candescent and not shabby then they are braless. If someone is shabby and grisly then they are bluff. All rushlike, bluff people are beltless. Paige is rushlike.", "logic": "\nBraless(paige)\nCandescent(paige)\nGrisly(paige)\nRushlike(casie)\nShabby(casie)\nGrisly(casie)\nShabby(serena)\nShabby(bendite)\nBluff(bendite)\nBraless(bendite)\nforall x (Candescent(x) and not Shabby(x) -> Braless(x))\nforall x (Shabby(x) and Grisly(x) -> Bluff(x))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) and Bluff(x) -> Beltless(x))\n\nRushlike(paige)\n\nRushlike(paige) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Susannah is perturbed. Susannah is aphoristic. Susannah is narcotic. Johann is pointed. Johann is gauche. Johann is narcotic. Alonso is gauche. Nicola is gauche. Nicola is foldaway. Nicola is perturbed. If someone is aphoristic and not gauche then they are perturbed. If someone is gauche and narcotic then they are foldaway. All pointed, foldaway people are brasslike. Nicola is not aphoristic.", "logic": "\nPerturbed(susannah)\nAphoristic(susannah)\nNarcotic(susannah)\nPointed(johann)\nGauche(johann)\nNarcotic(johann)\nGauche(alonso)\nGauche(nicola)\nFoldaway(nicola)\nPerturbed(nicola)\nforall x (Aphoristic(x) and not Gauche(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Narcotic(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Pointed(x) and Foldaway(x) -> Brasslike(x))\n\nnot Aphoristic(nicola)\n\nnot Aphoristic(nicola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Spence is ecologic. Spence is unsmiling. Spence is emollient. Anselma is allegretto. Anselma is apocrine. Anselma is emollient. Odille is apocrine. Heinrich is apocrine. Heinrich is muslim. Heinrich is ecologic. If someone is unsmiling and not apocrine then they are ecologic. If someone is apocrine and emollient then they are muslim. All allegretto, muslim people are leibnizian. Odille is unsmiling.", "logic": "\nEcologic(spence)\nUnsmiling(spence)\nEmollient(spence)\nAllegretto(anselma)\nApocrine(anselma)\nEmollient(anselma)\nApocrine(odille)\nApocrine(heinrich)\nMuslim(heinrich)\nEcologic(heinrich)\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and not Apocrine(x) -> Ecologic(x))\nforall x (Apocrine(x) and Emollient(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Allegretto(x) and Muslim(x) -> Leibnizian(x))\n\nUnsmiling(odille)\n\nUnsmiling(odille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "The torrie preen the van. The torrie is parched. The harlan is miniscule. The harlan strap the ursala. The harlan strap the van. The ursala is ulterior. The ursala point the harlan. The van is miniscule. The van strap the torrie. The van strap the ursala. If someone preen the van and the van point the ursala then they chase the harlan. If someone preen the harlan and they need the van then they chase the van. If someone preen the van then the van point the ursala. The harlan strap the van.", "logic": "\nPreen(torrie, van)\nParched(torrie)\nMiniscule(harlan)\nStrap(harlan, ursala)\nStrap(harlan, van)\nUlterior(ursala)\nPoint(ursala, harlan)\nMiniscule(van)\nStrap(van, torrie)\nStrap(van, ursala)\nforall x (Preen(x, van) and Point(van, ursala) -> Preen(x, harlan))\nforall x (Preen(x, harlan) and Point(x, van) -> Preen(x, van))\nforall x (Preen(x, van) -> Point(van, ursala))\n\nStrap(harlan, van)\n\ntherefore Strap(harlan, van)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The michelle trouble the delly. The michelle is scrabbly. The gerrilee is apparent. The gerrilee throne the ramsay. The gerrilee throne the delly. The ramsay is chockful. The ramsay lignify the gerrilee. The delly is apparent. The delly throne the michelle. The delly throne the ramsay. If someone trouble the delly and the delly lignify the ramsay then they chase the gerrilee. If someone trouble the gerrilee and they need the delly then they chase the delly. If someone trouble the delly then the delly lignify the ramsay. The gerrilee does not see the delly.", "logic": "\nTrouble(michelle, delly)\nScrabbly(michelle)\nApparent(gerrilee)\nThrone(gerrilee, ramsay)\nThrone(gerrilee, delly)\nChockful(ramsay)\nLignify(ramsay, gerrilee)\nApparent(delly)\nThrone(delly, michelle)\nThrone(delly, ramsay)\nforall x (Trouble(x, delly) and Lignify(delly, ramsay) -> Trouble(x, gerrilee))\nforall x (Trouble(x, gerrilee) and Lignify(x, delly) -> Trouble(x, delly))\nforall x (Trouble(x, delly) -> Lignify(delly, ramsay))\n\nnot Throne(gerrilee, delly)\n\ntherefore Throne(gerrilee, delly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The hari paragraph the anthe. The hari is cupular. The danya is diluvial. The danya demystify the sanderson. The danya demystify the anthe. The sanderson is overdue. The sanderson revenge the danya. The anthe is diluvial. The anthe demystify the hari. The anthe demystify the sanderson. If someone paragraph the anthe and the anthe revenge the sanderson then they chase the danya. If someone paragraph the danya and they need the anthe then they chase the anthe. If someone paragraph the anthe then the anthe revenge the sanderson. The anthe revenge the sanderson.", "logic": "\nParagraph(hari, anthe)\nCupular(hari)\nDiluvial(danya)\nDemystify(danya, sanderson)\nDemystify(danya, anthe)\nOverdue(sanderson)\nRevenge(sanderson, danya)\nDiluvial(anthe)\nDemystify(anthe, hari)\nDemystify(anthe, sanderson)\nforall x (Paragraph(x, anthe) and Revenge(anthe, sanderson) -> Paragraph(x, danya))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, danya) and Revenge(x, anthe) -> Paragraph(x, anthe))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, anthe) -> Revenge(anthe, sanderson))\n\nRevenge(anthe, sanderson)\n\nParagraph(hari, anthe) and forall x (Paragraph(x, anthe) -> Revenge(anthe, sanderson)) -> therefore Revenge(anthe, sanderson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The herbie repulse the tomiko. The herbie is conforming. The shimon is unaffixed. The shimon stutter the connor. The shimon stutter the tomiko. The connor is empirical. The connor dislocate the shimon. The tomiko is unaffixed. The tomiko stutter the herbie. The tomiko stutter the connor. If someone repulse the tomiko and the tomiko dislocate the connor then they chase the shimon. If someone repulse the shimon and they need the tomiko then they chase the tomiko. If someone repulse the tomiko then the tomiko dislocate the connor. The tomiko does not need the connor.", "logic": "\nRepulse(herbie, tomiko)\nConforming(herbie)\nUnaffixed(shimon)\nStutter(shimon, connor)\nStutter(shimon, tomiko)\nEmpirical(connor)\nDislocate(connor, shimon)\nUnaffixed(tomiko)\nStutter(tomiko, herbie)\nStutter(tomiko, connor)\nforall x (Repulse(x, tomiko) and Dislocate(tomiko, connor) -> Repulse(x, shimon))\nforall x (Repulse(x, shimon) and Dislocate(x, tomiko) -> Repulse(x, tomiko))\nforall x (Repulse(x, tomiko) -> Dislocate(tomiko, connor))\n\nnot Dislocate(tomiko, connor)\n\nRepulse(herbie, tomiko) and forall x (Repulse(x, tomiko) -> Dislocate(tomiko, connor)) -> therefore Dislocate(tomiko, connor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The john miscast the greggory. The john is dejected. The nester is reniform. The nester promise the robinette. The nester promise the greggory. The robinette is protean. The robinette overlap the nester. The greggory is reniform. The greggory promise the john. The greggory promise the robinette. If someone miscast the greggory and the greggory overlap the robinette then they chase the nester. If someone miscast the nester and they need the greggory then they chase the greggory. If someone miscast the greggory then the greggory overlap the robinette. The john miscast the nester.", "logic": "\nMiscast(john, greggory)\nDejected(john)\nReniform(nester)\nPromise(nester, robinette)\nPromise(nester, greggory)\nProtean(robinette)\nOverlap(robinette, nester)\nReniform(greggory)\nPromise(greggory, john)\nPromise(greggory, robinette)\nforall x (Miscast(x, greggory) and Overlap(greggory, robinette) -> Miscast(x, nester))\nforall x (Miscast(x, nester) and Overlap(x, greggory) -> Miscast(x, greggory))\nforall x (Miscast(x, greggory) -> Overlap(greggory, robinette))\n\nMiscast(john, nester)\n\nMiscast(john, greggory) and forall x (Miscast(x, greggory) -> Overlap(greggory, robinette)) -> therefore Overlap(greggory, robinette) Miscast(john, greggory) and Overlap(greggory, robinette) and forall x (Miscast(x, greggory) and Overlap(greggory, robinette) -> Miscast(x, nester)) -> therefore Miscast(john, nester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The stephanie scold the vivyan. The stephanie is ferocious. The dorisa is bacteremic. The dorisa stick the ardelle. The dorisa stick the vivyan. The ardelle is overt. The ardelle retake the dorisa. The vivyan is bacteremic. The vivyan stick the stephanie. The vivyan stick the ardelle. If someone scold the vivyan and the vivyan retake the ardelle then they chase the dorisa. If someone scold the dorisa and they need the vivyan then they chase the vivyan. If someone scold the vivyan then the vivyan retake the ardelle. The stephanie does not chase the dorisa.", "logic": "\nScold(stephanie, vivyan)\nFerocious(stephanie)\nBacteremic(dorisa)\nStick(dorisa, ardelle)\nStick(dorisa, vivyan)\nOvert(ardelle)\nRetake(ardelle, dorisa)\nBacteremic(vivyan)\nStick(vivyan, stephanie)\nStick(vivyan, ardelle)\nforall x (Scold(x, vivyan) and Retake(vivyan, ardelle) -> Scold(x, dorisa))\nforall x (Scold(x, dorisa) and Retake(x, vivyan) -> Scold(x, vivyan))\nforall x (Scold(x, vivyan) -> Retake(vivyan, ardelle))\n\nnot Scold(stephanie, dorisa)\n\nScold(stephanie, vivyan) and forall x (Scold(x, vivyan) -> Retake(vivyan, ardelle)) -> therefore Retake(vivyan, ardelle) Scold(stephanie, vivyan) and Retake(vivyan, ardelle) and forall x (Scold(x, vivyan) and Retake(vivyan, ardelle) -> Scold(x, dorisa)) -> therefore Scold(stephanie, dorisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The fulvia centralise the garvey. The fulvia is sepulchral. The ettie is tortuous. The ettie sleepwalk the marena. The ettie sleepwalk the garvey. The marena is drumhead. The marena foreswear the ettie. The garvey is tortuous. The garvey sleepwalk the fulvia. The garvey sleepwalk the marena. If someone centralise the garvey and the garvey foreswear the marena then they chase the ettie. If someone centralise the ettie and they need the garvey then they chase the garvey. If someone centralise the garvey then the garvey foreswear the marena. The ettie does not chase the garvey.", "logic": "\nCentralise(fulvia, garvey)\nSepulchral(fulvia)\nTortuous(ettie)\nSleepwalk(ettie, marena)\nSleepwalk(ettie, garvey)\nDrumhead(marena)\nForeswear(marena, ettie)\nTortuous(garvey)\nSleepwalk(garvey, fulvia)\nSleepwalk(garvey, marena)\nforall x (Centralise(x, garvey) and Foreswear(garvey, marena) -> Centralise(x, ettie))\nforall x (Centralise(x, ettie) and Foreswear(x, garvey) -> Centralise(x, garvey))\nforall x (Centralise(x, garvey) -> Foreswear(garvey, marena))\n\nnot Centralise(ettie, garvey)\n\nforall x (Centralise(x, ettie) and Foreswear(x, garvey) -> Centralise(x, garvey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The shayla descant the valencia. The shayla is nonelected. The tabor is aware. The tabor empathize the pet. The tabor empathize the valencia. The pet is touched. The pet tinge the tabor. The valencia is aware. The valencia empathize the shayla. The valencia empathize the pet. If someone descant the valencia and the valencia tinge the pet then they chase the tabor. If someone descant the tabor and they need the valencia then they chase the valencia. If someone descant the valencia then the valencia tinge the pet. The valencia descant the tabor.", "logic": "\nDescant(shayla, valencia)\nNonelected(shayla)\nAware(tabor)\nEmpathize(tabor, pet)\nEmpathize(tabor, valencia)\nTouched(pet)\nTinge(pet, tabor)\nAware(valencia)\nEmpathize(valencia, shayla)\nEmpathize(valencia, pet)\nforall x (Descant(x, valencia) and Tinge(valencia, pet) -> Descant(x, tabor))\nforall x (Descant(x, tabor) and Tinge(x, valencia) -> Descant(x, valencia))\nforall x (Descant(x, valencia) -> Tinge(valencia, pet))\n\nDescant(valencia, tabor)\n\nforall x (Descant(x, valencia) and Tinge(valencia, pet) -> Descant(x, tabor)) <- forall x (Descant(x, tabor) and Tinge(x, valencia) -> Descant(x, valencia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The franny remainder the sada. The franny is functional. The madelin is blocked. The madelin mooch the aida. The madelin mooch the sada. The aida is gluttonous. The aida jaunt the madelin. The sada is blocked. The sada mooch the franny. The sada mooch the aida. If someone remainder the sada and the sada jaunt the aida then they chase the madelin. If someone remainder the madelin and they need the sada then they chase the sada. If someone remainder the sada then the sada jaunt the aida. The aida does not chase the madelin.", "logic": "\nRemainder(franny, sada)\nFunctional(franny)\nBlocked(madelin)\nMooch(madelin, aida)\nMooch(madelin, sada)\nGluttonous(aida)\nJaunt(aida, madelin)\nBlocked(sada)\nMooch(sada, franny)\nMooch(sada, aida)\nforall x (Remainder(x, sada) and Jaunt(sada, aida) -> Remainder(x, madelin))\nforall x (Remainder(x, madelin) and Jaunt(x, sada) -> Remainder(x, sada))\nforall x (Remainder(x, sada) -> Jaunt(sada, aida))\n\nnot Remainder(aida, madelin)\n\nforall x (Remainder(x, sada) and Jaunt(sada, aida) -> Remainder(x, madelin)) <- forall x (Remainder(x, madelin) and Jaunt(x, sada) -> Remainder(x, sada)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The pete wallpaper the cassi. The pete is purging. The madel is snorty. The madel welcome the yovonnda. The madel welcome the cassi. The yovonnda is worthless. The yovonnda haze the madel. The cassi is snorty. The cassi welcome the pete. The cassi welcome the yovonnda. If someone wallpaper the cassi and the cassi haze the yovonnda then they chase the madel. If someone wallpaper the madel and they need the cassi then they chase the cassi. If someone wallpaper the cassi then the cassi haze the yovonnda. The madel haze the madel.", "logic": "\nWallpaper(pete, cassi)\nPurging(pete)\nSnorty(madel)\nWelcome(madel, yovonnda)\nWelcome(madel, cassi)\nWorthless(yovonnda)\nHaze(yovonnda, madel)\nSnorty(cassi)\nWelcome(cassi, pete)\nWelcome(cassi, yovonnda)\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, cassi) and Haze(cassi, yovonnda) -> Wallpaper(x, madel))\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, madel) and Haze(x, cassi) -> Wallpaper(x, cassi))\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, cassi) -> Haze(cassi, yovonnda))\n\nHaze(madel, madel)\n\nHaze(madel, madel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The neel besprinkle the howard. The neel is sapphire. The charisse is hurtful. The charisse endue the madelene. The charisse endue the howard. The madelene is rightish. The madelene dulcify the charisse. The howard is hurtful. The howard endue the neel. The howard endue the madelene. If someone besprinkle the howard and the howard dulcify the madelene then they chase the charisse. If someone besprinkle the charisse and they need the howard then they chase the howard. If someone besprinkle the howard then the howard dulcify the madelene. The neel is not hurtful.", "logic": "\nBesprinkle(neel, howard)\nSapphire(neel)\nHurtful(charisse)\nEndue(charisse, madelene)\nEndue(charisse, howard)\nRightish(madelene)\nDulcify(madelene, charisse)\nHurtful(howard)\nEndue(howard, neel)\nEndue(howard, madelene)\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, howard) and Dulcify(howard, madelene) -> Besprinkle(x, charisse))\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, charisse) and Dulcify(x, howard) -> Besprinkle(x, howard))\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, howard) -> Dulcify(howard, madelene))\n\nnot Hurtful(neel)\n\nnot Hurtful(neel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The jenilee massage the arlie. The jenilee is meridian. The janus is helpful. The janus distil the karlotte. The janus distil the arlie. The karlotte is psychical. The karlotte smack the janus. The arlie is helpful. The arlie distil the jenilee. The arlie distil the karlotte. If someone massage the arlie and the arlie smack the karlotte then they chase the janus. If someone massage the janus and they need the arlie then they chase the arlie. If someone massage the arlie then the arlie smack the karlotte. The jenilee smack the janus.", "logic": "\nMassage(jenilee, arlie)\nMeridian(jenilee)\nHelpful(janus)\nDistil(janus, karlotte)\nDistil(janus, arlie)\nPsychical(karlotte)\nSmack(karlotte, janus)\nHelpful(arlie)\nDistil(arlie, jenilee)\nDistil(arlie, karlotte)\nforall x (Massage(x, arlie) and Smack(arlie, karlotte) -> Massage(x, janus))\nforall x (Massage(x, janus) and Smack(x, arlie) -> Massage(x, arlie))\nforall x (Massage(x, arlie) -> Smack(arlie, karlotte))\n\nSmack(jenilee, janus)\n\nSmack(jenilee, janus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2147"} {"premises": "The koressa is rotted. The koressa is pyrogallic. The koressa is sectioned. Cold, degraded people are iranian. Cold people are degraded. The koressa is sectioned.", "logic": "\nRotted(koressa)\nPyrogallic(koressa)\nSectioned(koressa)\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) and Degraded(x) -> Iranian(x))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) -> Degraded(x))\n\nSectioned(koressa)\n\ntherefore Sectioned(koressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "The tricia is deserved. The tricia is breasted. The tricia is verbatim. Cold, crashing people are moire. Cold people are crashing. The tricia is not verbatim.", "logic": "\nDeserved(tricia)\nBreasted(tricia)\nVerbatim(tricia)\nforall x (Breasted(x) and Crashing(x) -> Moire(x))\nforall x (Breasted(x) -> Crashing(x))\n\nnot Verbatim(tricia)\n\ntherefore Verbatim(tricia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "The isaiah is snappish. The isaiah is unworldly. The isaiah is sincere. Cold, dopy people are finnish. Cold people are dopy. The isaiah is dopy.", "logic": "\nSnappish(isaiah)\nUnworldly(isaiah)\nSincere(isaiah)\nforall x (Unworldly(x) and Dopy(x) -> Finnish(x))\nforall x (Unworldly(x) -> Dopy(x))\n\nDopy(isaiah)\n\nUnworldly(isaiah) and forall x (Unworldly(x) -> Dopy(x)) -> therefore Dopy(isaiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "The alissa is insightful. The alissa is fewest. The alissa is apophatic. Cold, ruling people are chapfallen. Cold people are ruling. The alissa is not ruling.", "logic": "\nInsightful(alissa)\nFewest(alissa)\nApophatic(alissa)\nforall x (Fewest(x) and Ruling(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\nforall x (Fewest(x) -> Ruling(x))\n\nnot Ruling(alissa)\n\nFewest(alissa) and forall x (Fewest(x) -> Ruling(x)) -> therefore Ruling(alissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "The chelsey is polyphase. The chelsey is classless. The chelsey is knightly. Cold, trackable people are physical. Cold people are trackable. The chelsey is physical.", "logic": "\nPolyphase(chelsey)\nClassless(chelsey)\nKnightly(chelsey)\nforall x (Classless(x) and Trackable(x) -> Physical(x))\nforall x (Classless(x) -> Trackable(x))\n\nPhysical(chelsey)\n\nClassless(chelsey) and forall x (Classless(x) -> Trackable(x)) -> therefore Trackable(chelsey) Classless(chelsey) and Trackable(chelsey) and forall x (Classless(x) and Trackable(x) -> Physical(x)) -> therefore Physical(chelsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "The janine is donnean. The janine is maudlin. The janine is petty. Cold, delusive people are anabatic. Cold people are delusive. The janine is not anabatic.", "logic": "\nDonnean(janine)\nMaudlin(janine)\nPetty(janine)\nforall x (Maudlin(x) and Delusive(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nforall x (Maudlin(x) -> Delusive(x))\n\nnot Anabatic(janine)\n\nMaudlin(janine) and forall x (Maudlin(x) -> Delusive(x)) -> therefore Delusive(janine) Maudlin(janine) and Delusive(janine) and forall x (Maudlin(x) and Delusive(x) -> Anabatic(x)) -> therefore Anabatic(janine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "The sholom is proximate. The sholom is forehanded. The sholom is errant. Cold, censurable people are calumnious. Cold people are censurable. The sholom does not chase the sholom.", "logic": "\nProximate(sholom)\nForehanded(sholom)\nErrant(sholom)\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Censurable(x) -> Calumnious(x))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) -> Censurable(x))\n\nnot Chases(sholom, sholom)\n\nnot Chases(sholom, sholom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "The denny is anabolic. The denny is isometric. The denny is arborary. Cold, scrubbed people are industrial. Cold people are scrubbed. The denny eats the denny.", "logic": "\nAnabolic(denny)\nIsometric(denny)\nArborary(denny)\nforall x (Isometric(x) and Scrubbed(x) -> Industrial(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Scrubbed(x))\n\nEats(denny, denny)\n\nEats(denny, denny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1079"} {"premises": "Teddi is suboceanic. Sal is lathery. Hynda is lathery. If something is lathery and naiant then it is systematic. Young, lathery things are rancid. If Teddi is systematic and Teddi is rancid then Teddi is supreme. If Hynda is colicky and Hynda is supreme then Hynda is suboceanic. If something is supreme then it is systematic. All suboceanic, rancid things are colicky. All suboceanic things are supreme. If something is supreme and suboceanic then it is systematic. Teddi is suboceanic.", "logic": "\nSuboceanic(teddi)\nLathery(sal)\nLathery(hynda)\nforall x (Lathery(x) and Naiant(x) -> Systematic(x))\nforall x (Supreme(x) and Lathery(x) -> Rancid(x))\nSystematic(teddi) and Rancid(teddi) -> Supreme(teddi)\nColicky(hynda) and Supreme(hynda) -> Suboceanic(hynda)\nforall x (Supreme(x) -> Systematic(x))\nforall x (Suboceanic(x) and Rancid(x) -> Colicky(x))\nforall x (Suboceanic(x) -> Supreme(x))\nforall x (Supreme(x) and Suboceanic(x) -> Systematic(x))\n\nSuboceanic(teddi)\n\ntherefore Suboceanic(teddi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Cassi is completed. Hailee is bespoke. Terrie is bespoke. If something is bespoke and supreme then it is agape. Young, bespoke things are leavened. If Cassi is agape and Cassi is leavened then Cassi is biramous. If Terrie is rattling and Terrie is biramous then Terrie is completed. If something is biramous then it is agape. All completed, leavened things are rattling. All completed things are biramous. If something is biramous and completed then it is agape. Cassi is not completed.", "logic": "\nCompleted(cassi)\nBespoke(hailee)\nBespoke(terrie)\nforall x (Bespoke(x) and Supreme(x) -> Agape(x))\nforall x (Biramous(x) and Bespoke(x) -> Leavened(x))\nAgape(cassi) and Leavened(cassi) -> Biramous(cassi)\nRattling(terrie) and Biramous(terrie) -> Completed(terrie)\nforall x (Biramous(x) -> Agape(x))\nforall x (Completed(x) and Leavened(x) -> Rattling(x))\nforall x (Completed(x) -> Biramous(x))\nforall x (Biramous(x) and Completed(x) -> Agape(x))\n\nnot Completed(cassi)\n\ntherefore Completed(cassi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Brigit is polyglot. Emilio is cretaceous. Celestyna is cretaceous. If something is cretaceous and testaceous then it is future. Young, cretaceous things are antifungal. If Brigit is future and Brigit is antifungal then Brigit is adrift. If Celestyna is pessimal and Celestyna is adrift then Celestyna is polyglot. If something is adrift then it is future. All polyglot, antifungal things are pessimal. All polyglot things are adrift. If something is adrift and polyglot then it is future. Brigit is adrift.", "logic": "\nPolyglot(brigit)\nCretaceous(emilio)\nCretaceous(celestyna)\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) and Testaceous(x) -> Future(x))\nforall x (Adrift(x) and Cretaceous(x) -> Antifungal(x))\nFuture(brigit) and Antifungal(brigit) -> Adrift(brigit)\nPessimal(celestyna) and Adrift(celestyna) -> Polyglot(celestyna)\nforall x (Adrift(x) -> Future(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) and Antifungal(x) -> Pessimal(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) -> Adrift(x))\nforall x (Adrift(x) and Polyglot(x) -> Future(x))\n\nAdrift(brigit)\n\nPolyglot(brigit) and forall x (Polyglot(x) -> Adrift(x)) -> therefore Adrift(brigit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Kevan is memorable. Pacifica is guyanese. Robbi is guyanese. If something is guyanese and undyed then it is auctorial. Young, guyanese things are hundred. If Kevan is auctorial and Kevan is hundred then Kevan is none. If Robbi is startled and Robbi is none then Robbi is memorable. If something is none then it is auctorial. All memorable, hundred things are startled. All memorable things are none. If something is none and memorable then it is auctorial. Kevan is not none.", "logic": "\nMemorable(kevan)\nGuyanese(pacifica)\nGuyanese(robbi)\nforall x (Guyanese(x) and Undyed(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nforall x (None(x) and Guyanese(x) -> Hundred(x))\nAuctorial(kevan) and Hundred(kevan) -> None(kevan)\nStartled(robbi) and None(robbi) -> Memorable(robbi)\nforall x (None(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) and Hundred(x) -> Startled(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) -> None(x))\nforall x (None(x) and Memorable(x) -> Auctorial(x))\n\nnot None(kevan)\n\nMemorable(kevan) and forall x (Memorable(x) -> None(x)) -> therefore None(kevan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Latrena is unrigged. Winthrop is shoeless. Dalia is shoeless. If something is shoeless and boffo then it is amyloidal. Young, shoeless things are plebeian. If Latrena is amyloidal and Latrena is plebeian then Latrena is valueless. If Dalia is extensive and Dalia is valueless then Dalia is unrigged. If something is valueless then it is amyloidal. All unrigged, plebeian things are extensive. All unrigged things are valueless. If something is valueless and unrigged then it is amyloidal. Latrena is amyloidal.", "logic": "\nUnrigged(latrena)\nShoeless(winthrop)\nShoeless(dalia)\nforall x (Shoeless(x) and Boffo(x) -> Amyloidal(x))\nforall x (Valueless(x) and Shoeless(x) -> Plebeian(x))\nAmyloidal(latrena) and Plebeian(latrena) -> Valueless(latrena)\nExtensive(dalia) and Valueless(dalia) -> Unrigged(dalia)\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> Amyloidal(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) and Plebeian(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) -> Valueless(x))\nforall x (Valueless(x) and Unrigged(x) -> Amyloidal(x))\n\nAmyloidal(latrena)\n\nUnrigged(latrena) and forall x (Unrigged(x) -> Valueless(x)) -> therefore Valueless(latrena) Valueless(latrena) and forall x (Valueless(x) -> Amyloidal(x)) -> therefore Amyloidal(latrena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Kiley is omani. Marit is haywire. Isabelle is haywire. If something is haywire and ubiquitous then it is suborbital. Young, haywire things are larval. If Kiley is suborbital and Kiley is larval then Kiley is medical. If Isabelle is offside and Isabelle is medical then Isabelle is omani. If something is medical then it is suborbital. All omani, larval things are offside. All omani things are medical. If something is medical and omani then it is suborbital. Kiley is not suborbital.", "logic": "\nOmani(kiley)\nHaywire(marit)\nHaywire(isabelle)\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Ubiquitous(x) -> Suborbital(x))\nforall x (Medical(x) and Haywire(x) -> Larval(x))\nSuborbital(kiley) and Larval(kiley) -> Medical(kiley)\nOffside(isabelle) and Medical(isabelle) -> Omani(isabelle)\nforall x (Medical(x) -> Suborbital(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) and Larval(x) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) -> Medical(x))\nforall x (Medical(x) and Omani(x) -> Suborbital(x))\n\nnot Suborbital(kiley)\n\nOmani(kiley) and forall x (Omani(x) -> Medical(x)) -> therefore Medical(kiley) Medical(kiley) and forall x (Medical(x) -> Suborbital(x)) -> therefore Suborbital(kiley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Rena is dipterous. Simmonds is magnetic. Ismail is magnetic. If something is magnetic and profound then it is duplex. Young, magnetic things are percipient. If Rena is duplex and Rena is percipient then Rena is anthropic. If Ismail is apractic and Ismail is anthropic then Ismail is dipterous. If something is anthropic then it is duplex. All dipterous, percipient things are apractic. All dipterous things are anthropic. If something is anthropic and dipterous then it is duplex. Ismail is not percipient.", "logic": "\nDipterous(rena)\nMagnetic(simmonds)\nMagnetic(ismail)\nforall x (Magnetic(x) and Profound(x) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Anthropic(x) and Magnetic(x) -> Percipient(x))\nDuplex(rena) and Percipient(rena) -> Anthropic(rena)\nApractic(ismail) and Anthropic(ismail) -> Dipterous(ismail)\nforall x (Anthropic(x) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Dipterous(x) and Percipient(x) -> Apractic(x))\nforall x (Dipterous(x) -> Anthropic(x))\nforall x (Anthropic(x) and Dipterous(x) -> Duplex(x))\n\nnot Percipient(ismail)\n\nforall x (Anthropic(x) and Magnetic(x) -> Percipient(x)) <- forall x (Dipterous(x) -> Anthropic(x)) <- Apractic(ismail) and Anthropic(ismail) -> Dipterous(ismail) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Barri is antsy. Lanie is liquefied. Parwane is liquefied. If something is liquefied and untoasted then it is sandalled. Young, liquefied things are blond. If Barri is sandalled and Barri is blond then Barri is levitical. If Parwane is epiphyseal and Parwane is levitical then Parwane is antsy. If something is levitical then it is sandalled. All antsy, blond things are epiphyseal. All antsy things are levitical. If something is levitical and antsy then it is sandalled. Barri is blond.", "logic": "\nAntsy(barri)\nLiquefied(lanie)\nLiquefied(parwane)\nforall x (Liquefied(x) and Untoasted(x) -> Sandalled(x))\nforall x (Levitical(x) and Liquefied(x) -> Blond(x))\nSandalled(barri) and Blond(barri) -> Levitical(barri)\nEpiphyseal(parwane) and Levitical(parwane) -> Antsy(parwane)\nforall x (Levitical(x) -> Sandalled(x))\nforall x (Antsy(x) and Blond(x) -> Epiphyseal(x))\nforall x (Antsy(x) -> Levitical(x))\nforall x (Levitical(x) and Antsy(x) -> Sandalled(x))\n\nBlond(barri)\n\nforall x (Levitical(x) and Liquefied(x) -> Blond(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Tuesday is palliative. Gertruda is unfearing. Winna is unfearing. If something is unfearing and actinal then it is unstated. Young, unfearing things are prosodic. If Tuesday is unstated and Tuesday is prosodic then Tuesday is fiftieth. If Winna is postmortal and Winna is fiftieth then Winna is palliative. If something is fiftieth then it is unstated. All palliative, prosodic things are postmortal. All palliative things are fiftieth. If something is fiftieth and palliative then it is unstated. Gertruda is not unstated.", "logic": "\nPalliative(tuesday)\nUnfearing(gertruda)\nUnfearing(winna)\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Actinal(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Prosodic(x))\nUnstated(tuesday) and Prosodic(tuesday) -> Fiftieth(tuesday)\nPostmortal(winna) and Fiftieth(winna) -> Palliative(winna)\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Palliative(x) and Prosodic(x) -> Postmortal(x))\nforall x (Palliative(x) -> Fiftieth(x))\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) and Palliative(x) -> Unstated(x))\n\nnot Unstated(gertruda)\n\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Unstated(x)) <- forall x (Palliative(x) -> Fiftieth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Godfree is unrecorded. Tiler is quavering. Hattie is quavering. If something is quavering and habited then it is grumbling. Young, quavering things are manky. If Godfree is grumbling and Godfree is manky then Godfree is ribless. If Hattie is fruticose and Hattie is ribless then Hattie is unrecorded. If something is ribless then it is grumbling. All unrecorded, manky things are fruticose. All unrecorded things are ribless. If something is ribless and unrecorded then it is grumbling. Godfree is habited.", "logic": "\nUnrecorded(godfree)\nQuavering(tiler)\nQuavering(hattie)\nforall x (Quavering(x) and Habited(x) -> Grumbling(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Quavering(x) -> Manky(x))\nGrumbling(godfree) and Manky(godfree) -> Ribless(godfree)\nFruticose(hattie) and Ribless(hattie) -> Unrecorded(hattie)\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Grumbling(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) and Manky(x) -> Fruticose(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Unrecorded(x) -> Grumbling(x))\n\nHabited(godfree)\n\nHabited(godfree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Dunc is oversize. Bard is empathetic. Hellene is empathetic. If something is empathetic and forked then it is galactic. Young, empathetic things are many. If Dunc is galactic and Dunc is many then Dunc is confutable. If Hellene is statute and Hellene is confutable then Hellene is oversize. If something is confutable then it is galactic. All oversize, many things are statute. All oversize things are confutable. If something is confutable and oversize then it is galactic. Dunc is not empathetic.", "logic": "\nOversize(dunc)\nEmpathetic(bard)\nEmpathetic(hellene)\nforall x (Empathetic(x) and Forked(x) -> Galactic(x))\nforall x (Confutable(x) and Empathetic(x) -> Many(x))\nGalactic(dunc) and Many(dunc) -> Confutable(dunc)\nStatute(hellene) and Confutable(hellene) -> Oversize(hellene)\nforall x (Confutable(x) -> Galactic(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) and Many(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) -> Confutable(x))\nforall x (Confutable(x) and Oversize(x) -> Galactic(x))\n\nnot Empathetic(dunc)\n\nnot Empathetic(dunc) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Otis is azimuthal. Ruperto is gasified. Zalman is gasified. If something is gasified and fictitious then it is fain. Young, gasified things are taiwanese. If Otis is fain and Otis is taiwanese then Otis is pneumatic. If Zalman is damaged and Zalman is pneumatic then Zalman is azimuthal. If something is pneumatic then it is fain. All azimuthal, taiwanese things are damaged. All azimuthal things are pneumatic. If something is pneumatic and azimuthal then it is fain. Zalman is fictitious.", "logic": "\nAzimuthal(otis)\nGasified(ruperto)\nGasified(zalman)\nforall x (Gasified(x) and Fictitious(x) -> Fain(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Gasified(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nFain(otis) and Taiwanese(otis) -> Pneumatic(otis)\nDamaged(zalman) and Pneumatic(zalman) -> Azimuthal(zalman)\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) -> Fain(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and Taiwanese(x) -> Damaged(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Azimuthal(x) -> Fain(x))\n\nFictitious(zalman)\n\nFictitious(zalman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Dillon is vermicular. Dillon is telescopic. Dillon is stubborn. Meira is pilotless. Meira is vermicular. Meira is potable. Meira is stubborn. Green, telescopic things are stooping. If something is pilotless then it is stooping. If something is indistinct then it is telescopic. If something is telescopic and stooping then it is pilotless. If something is potable then it is vermicular. If something is stooping then it is vermicular. If Dillon is vermicular and Dillon is pilotless then Dillon is telescopic. If something is vermicular then it is potable. Dillon is telescopic.", "logic": "\nVermicular(dillon)\nTelescopic(dillon)\nStubborn(dillon)\nPilotless(meira)\nVermicular(meira)\nPotable(meira)\nStubborn(meira)\nforall x (Vermicular(x) and Telescopic(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Pilotless(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nforall x (Telescopic(x) and Stooping(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nforall x (Potable(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Stooping(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nVermicular(dillon) and Pilotless(dillon) -> Telescopic(dillon)\nforall x (Vermicular(x) -> Potable(x))\n\nTelescopic(dillon)\n\ntherefore Telescopic(dillon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "Dimitri is randomised. Dimitri is diarrheic. Dimitri is analog. Sharline is misguided. Sharline is randomised. Sharline is unexceeded. Sharline is analog. Green, diarrheic things are edwardian. If something is misguided then it is edwardian. If something is brumous then it is diarrheic. If something is diarrheic and edwardian then it is misguided. If something is unexceeded then it is randomised. If something is edwardian then it is randomised. If Dimitri is randomised and Dimitri is misguided then Dimitri is diarrheic. If something is randomised then it is unexceeded. Sharline is not misguided.", "logic": "\nRandomised(dimitri)\nDiarrheic(dimitri)\nAnalog(dimitri)\nMisguided(sharline)\nRandomised(sharline)\nUnexceeded(sharline)\nAnalog(sharline)\nforall x (Randomised(x) and Diarrheic(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Brumous(x) -> Diarrheic(x))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Edwardian(x) -> Misguided(x))\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Edwardian(x) -> Randomised(x))\nRandomised(dimitri) and Misguided(dimitri) -> Diarrheic(dimitri)\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> Unexceeded(x))\n\nnot Misguided(sharline)\n\ntherefore Misguided(sharline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "Maxim is plodding. Maxim is uncanny. Maxim is fourth. Malva is corbelled. Malva is plodding. Malva is amorphous. Malva is fourth. Green, uncanny things are unerect. If something is corbelled then it is unerect. If something is stentorian then it is uncanny. If something is uncanny and unerect then it is corbelled. If something is amorphous then it is plodding. If something is unerect then it is plodding. If Maxim is plodding and Maxim is corbelled then Maxim is uncanny. If something is plodding then it is amorphous. Maxim is amorphous.", "logic": "\nPlodding(maxim)\nUncanny(maxim)\nFourth(maxim)\nCorbelled(malva)\nPlodding(malva)\nAmorphous(malva)\nFourth(malva)\nforall x (Plodding(x) and Uncanny(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Stentorian(x) -> Uncanny(x))\nforall x (Uncanny(x) and Unerect(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Amorphous(x) -> Plodding(x))\nforall x (Unerect(x) -> Plodding(x))\nPlodding(maxim) and Corbelled(maxim) -> Uncanny(maxim)\nforall x (Plodding(x) -> Amorphous(x))\n\nAmorphous(maxim)\n\nPlodding(maxim) and forall x (Plodding(x) -> Amorphous(x)) -> therefore Amorphous(maxim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "Kathe is climactic. Kathe is peeled. Kathe is anorthitic. Leonora is greensick. Leonora is climactic. Leonora is taken. Leonora is anorthitic. Green, peeled things are newborn. If something is greensick then it is newborn. If something is hilly then it is peeled. If something is peeled and newborn then it is greensick. If something is taken then it is climactic. If something is newborn then it is climactic. If Kathe is climactic and Kathe is greensick then Kathe is peeled. If something is climactic then it is taken. Kathe is not newborn.", "logic": "\nClimactic(kathe)\nPeeled(kathe)\nAnorthitic(kathe)\nGreensick(leonora)\nClimactic(leonora)\nTaken(leonora)\nAnorthitic(leonora)\nforall x (Climactic(x) and Peeled(x) -> Newborn(x))\nforall x (Greensick(x) -> Newborn(x))\nforall x (Hilly(x) -> Peeled(x))\nforall x (Peeled(x) and Newborn(x) -> Greensick(x))\nforall x (Taken(x) -> Climactic(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Climactic(x))\nClimactic(kathe) and Greensick(kathe) -> Peeled(kathe)\nforall x (Climactic(x) -> Taken(x))\n\nnot Newborn(kathe)\n\nClimactic(kathe) and Peeled(kathe) and forall x (Climactic(x) and Peeled(x) -> Newborn(x)) -> therefore Newborn(kathe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "Dabney is aquiferous. Dabney is acceptable. Dabney is regulative. Gretal is wingless. Gretal is aquiferous. Gretal is basilican. Gretal is regulative. Green, acceptable things are crumbly. If something is wingless then it is crumbly. If something is gristly then it is acceptable. If something is acceptable and crumbly then it is wingless. If something is basilican then it is aquiferous. If something is crumbly then it is aquiferous. If Dabney is aquiferous and Dabney is wingless then Dabney is acceptable. If something is aquiferous then it is basilican. Dabney is wingless.", "logic": "\nAquiferous(dabney)\nAcceptable(dabney)\nRegulative(dabney)\nWingless(gretal)\nAquiferous(gretal)\nBasilican(gretal)\nRegulative(gretal)\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nforall x (Gristly(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Acceptable(x) and Crumbly(x) -> Wingless(x))\nforall x (Basilican(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\nAquiferous(dabney) and Wingless(dabney) -> Acceptable(dabney)\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Basilican(x))\n\nWingless(dabney)\n\nAquiferous(dabney) and Acceptable(dabney) and forall x (Aquiferous(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Crumbly(x)) -> therefore Crumbly(dabney) Acceptable(dabney) and Crumbly(dabney) and forall x (Acceptable(x) and Crumbly(x) -> Wingless(x)) -> therefore Wingless(dabney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "Clint is aurous. Clint is fluvial. Clint is roadless. Dina is auric. Dina is aurous. Dina is rear. Dina is roadless. Green, fluvial things are sharp. If something is auric then it is sharp. If something is plumy then it is fluvial. If something is fluvial and sharp then it is auric. If something is rear then it is aurous. If something is sharp then it is aurous. If Clint is aurous and Clint is auric then Clint is fluvial. If something is aurous then it is rear. Clint is not auric.", "logic": "\nAurous(clint)\nFluvial(clint)\nRoadless(clint)\nAuric(dina)\nAurous(dina)\nRear(dina)\nRoadless(dina)\nforall x (Aurous(x) and Fluvial(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Auric(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Plumy(x) -> Fluvial(x))\nforall x (Fluvial(x) and Sharp(x) -> Auric(x))\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Aurous(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Aurous(x))\nAurous(clint) and Auric(clint) -> Fluvial(clint)\nforall x (Aurous(x) -> Rear(x))\n\nnot Auric(clint)\n\nAurous(clint) and Fluvial(clint) and forall x (Aurous(x) and Fluvial(x) -> Sharp(x)) -> therefore Sharp(clint) Fluvial(clint) and Sharp(clint) and forall x (Fluvial(x) and Sharp(x) -> Auric(x)) -> therefore Auric(clint)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "Dyann is north. Dyann is avionic. Dyann is gowned. Marcos is unadorned. Marcos is north. Marcos is fruiting. Marcos is gowned. Green, avionic things are liii. If something is unadorned then it is liii. If something is periodical then it is avionic. If something is avionic and liii then it is unadorned. If something is fruiting then it is north. If something is liii then it is north. If Dyann is north and Dyann is unadorned then Dyann is avionic. If something is north then it is fruiting. Marcos is not avionic.", "logic": "\nNorth(dyann)\nAvionic(dyann)\nGowned(dyann)\nUnadorned(marcos)\nNorth(marcos)\nFruiting(marcos)\nGowned(marcos)\nforall x (North(x) and Avionic(x) -> Liii(x))\nforall x (Unadorned(x) -> Liii(x))\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Avionic(x))\nforall x (Avionic(x) and Liii(x) -> Unadorned(x))\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> North(x))\nforall x (Liii(x) -> North(x))\nNorth(dyann) and Unadorned(dyann) -> Avionic(dyann)\nforall x (North(x) -> Fruiting(x))\n\nnot Avionic(marcos)\n\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Avionic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "Krystalle is basilar. Krystalle is dipped. Krystalle is stinking. Chev is virtuoso. Chev is basilar. Chev is anonymous. Chev is stinking. Green, dipped things are pouring. If something is virtuoso then it is pouring. If something is chiasmatic then it is dipped. If something is dipped and pouring then it is virtuoso. If something is anonymous then it is basilar. If something is pouring then it is basilar. If Krystalle is basilar and Krystalle is virtuoso then Krystalle is dipped. If something is basilar then it is anonymous. Chev is chiasmatic.", "logic": "\nBasilar(krystalle)\nDipped(krystalle)\nStinking(krystalle)\nVirtuoso(chev)\nBasilar(chev)\nAnonymous(chev)\nStinking(chev)\nforall x (Basilar(x) and Dipped(x) -> Pouring(x))\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Pouring(x))\nforall x (Chiasmatic(x) -> Dipped(x))\nforall x (Dipped(x) and Pouring(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Pouring(x) -> Basilar(x))\nBasilar(krystalle) and Virtuoso(krystalle) -> Dipped(krystalle)\nforall x (Basilar(x) -> Anonymous(x))\n\nChiasmatic(chev)\n\nChiasmatic(chev) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1778"} {"premises": "The marketa caddie the lissa. The marketa skid the bertram. The bertram caddie the marketa. The bertram is barbarous. The bertram is assisted. The bertram is aphakic. The bertram winkle the marketa. The bertram skid the silvester. The silvester caddie the marketa. The silvester caddie the bertram. The silvester caddie the lissa. The silvester skid the lissa. The lissa is insomniac. The lissa is aphakic. The lissa skid the bertram. If someone is aphakic and they visit the silvester then they chase the silvester. If someone is barbarous then they need the silvester. If someone winkle the bertram then the bertram skid the lissa. If someone caddie the marketa then they chase the silvester. If someone is blooded and they visit the lissa then they need the silvester. If the silvester is barbarous and the silvester skid the lissa then the silvester is insomniac. If someone caddie the silvester and they chase the marketa then they are aphakic. If someone is barbarous and they visit the silvester then they visit the marketa. The bertram is assisted.", "logic": "\nCaddie(marketa, lissa)\nSkid(marketa, bertram)\nCaddie(bertram, marketa)\nBarbarous(bertram)\nAssisted(bertram)\nAphakic(bertram)\nWinkle(bertram, marketa)\nSkid(bertram, silvester)\nCaddie(silvester, marketa)\nCaddie(silvester, bertram)\nCaddie(silvester, lissa)\nSkid(silvester, lissa)\nInsomniac(lissa)\nAphakic(lissa)\nSkid(lissa, bertram)\nforall x (Aphakic(x) and Skid(x, silvester) -> Caddie(x, silvester))\nforall x (Barbarous(x) -> Winkle(x, silvester))\nforall x (Winkle(x, bertram) -> Skid(bertram, lissa))\nforall x (Caddie(x, marketa) -> Caddie(x, silvester))\nforall x (Blooded(x) and Skid(x, lissa) -> Winkle(x, silvester))\nBarbarous(silvester) and Skid(silvester, lissa) -> Insomniac(silvester)\nforall x (Caddie(x, silvester) and Caddie(x, marketa) -> Aphakic(x))\nforall x (Barbarous(x) and Skid(x, silvester) -> Skid(x, marketa))\n\nAssisted(bertram)\n\ntherefore Assisted(bertram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The clovis signal the emeline. The clovis obsolesce the marijo. The marijo signal the clovis. The marijo is flaky. The marijo is homy. The marijo is reflex. The marijo bind the clovis. The marijo obsolesce the debbie. The debbie signal the clovis. The debbie signal the marijo. The debbie signal the emeline. The debbie obsolesce the emeline. The emeline is faustian. The emeline is reflex. The emeline obsolesce the marijo. If someone is reflex and they visit the debbie then they chase the debbie. If someone is flaky then they need the debbie. If someone bind the marijo then the marijo obsolesce the emeline. If someone signal the clovis then they chase the debbie. If someone is lawful and they visit the emeline then they need the debbie. If the debbie is flaky and the debbie obsolesce the emeline then the debbie is faustian. If someone signal the debbie and they chase the clovis then they are reflex. If someone is flaky and they visit the debbie then they visit the clovis. The emeline is not faustian.", "logic": "\nSignal(clovis, emeline)\nObsolesce(clovis, marijo)\nSignal(marijo, clovis)\nFlaky(marijo)\nHomy(marijo)\nReflex(marijo)\nBind(marijo, clovis)\nObsolesce(marijo, debbie)\nSignal(debbie, clovis)\nSignal(debbie, marijo)\nSignal(debbie, emeline)\nObsolesce(debbie, emeline)\nFaustian(emeline)\nReflex(emeline)\nObsolesce(emeline, marijo)\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Obsolesce(x, debbie) -> Signal(x, debbie))\nforall x (Flaky(x) -> Bind(x, debbie))\nforall x (Bind(x, marijo) -> Obsolesce(marijo, emeline))\nforall x (Signal(x, clovis) -> Signal(x, debbie))\nforall x (Lawful(x) and Obsolesce(x, emeline) -> Bind(x, debbie))\nFlaky(debbie) and Obsolesce(debbie, emeline) -> Faustian(debbie)\nforall x (Signal(x, debbie) and Signal(x, clovis) -> Reflex(x))\nforall x (Flaky(x) and Obsolesce(x, debbie) -> Obsolesce(x, clovis))\n\nnot Faustian(emeline)\n\ntherefore Faustian(emeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The gladis mould the bird. The gladis gasify the gere. The gere mould the gladis. The gere is enormous. The gere is xxvii. The gere is cashed. The gere smooch the gladis. The gere gasify the althea. The althea mould the gladis. The althea mould the gere. The althea mould the bird. The althea gasify the bird. The bird is geodesic. The bird is cashed. The bird gasify the gere. If someone is cashed and they visit the althea then they chase the althea. If someone is enormous then they need the althea. If someone smooch the gere then the gere gasify the bird. If someone mould the gladis then they chase the althea. If someone is senecan and they visit the bird then they need the althea. If the althea is enormous and the althea gasify the bird then the althea is geodesic. If someone mould the althea and they chase the gladis then they are cashed. If someone is enormous and they visit the althea then they visit the gladis. The gere smooch the althea.", "logic": "\nMould(gladis, bird)\nGasify(gladis, gere)\nMould(gere, gladis)\nEnormous(gere)\nXxvii(gere)\nCashed(gere)\nSmooch(gere, gladis)\nGasify(gere, althea)\nMould(althea, gladis)\nMould(althea, gere)\nMould(althea, bird)\nGasify(althea, bird)\nGeodesic(bird)\nCashed(bird)\nGasify(bird, gere)\nforall x (Cashed(x) and Gasify(x, althea) -> Mould(x, althea))\nforall x (Enormous(x) -> Smooch(x, althea))\nforall x (Smooch(x, gere) -> Gasify(gere, bird))\nforall x (Mould(x, gladis) -> Mould(x, althea))\nforall x (Senecan(x) and Gasify(x, bird) -> Smooch(x, althea))\nEnormous(althea) and Gasify(althea, bird) -> Geodesic(althea)\nforall x (Mould(x, althea) and Mould(x, gladis) -> Cashed(x))\nforall x (Enormous(x) and Gasify(x, althea) -> Gasify(x, gladis))\n\nSmooch(gere, althea)\n\nEnormous(gere) and forall x (Enormous(x) -> Smooch(x, althea)) -> therefore Smooch(gere, althea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The brenn shoo the sheela. The brenn afford the annissa. The annissa shoo the brenn. The annissa is isosceles. The annissa is patronless. The annissa is located. The annissa flux the brenn. The annissa afford the caroljean. The caroljean shoo the brenn. The caroljean shoo the annissa. The caroljean shoo the sheela. The caroljean afford the sheela. The sheela is bended. The sheela is located. The sheela afford the annissa. If someone is located and they visit the caroljean then they chase the caroljean. If someone is isosceles then they need the caroljean. If someone flux the annissa then the annissa afford the sheela. If someone shoo the brenn then they chase the caroljean. If someone is bedded and they visit the sheela then they need the caroljean. If the caroljean is isosceles and the caroljean afford the sheela then the caroljean is bended. If someone shoo the caroljean and they chase the brenn then they are located. If someone is isosceles and they visit the caroljean then they visit the brenn. The annissa does not need the caroljean.", "logic": "\nShoo(brenn, sheela)\nAfford(brenn, annissa)\nShoo(annissa, brenn)\nIsosceles(annissa)\nPatronless(annissa)\nLocated(annissa)\nFlux(annissa, brenn)\nAfford(annissa, caroljean)\nShoo(caroljean, brenn)\nShoo(caroljean, annissa)\nShoo(caroljean, sheela)\nAfford(caroljean, sheela)\nBended(sheela)\nLocated(sheela)\nAfford(sheela, annissa)\nforall x (Located(x) and Afford(x, caroljean) -> Shoo(x, caroljean))\nforall x (Isosceles(x) -> Flux(x, caroljean))\nforall x (Flux(x, annissa) -> Afford(annissa, sheela))\nforall x (Shoo(x, brenn) -> Shoo(x, caroljean))\nforall x (Bedded(x) and Afford(x, sheela) -> Flux(x, caroljean))\nIsosceles(caroljean) and Afford(caroljean, sheela) -> Bended(caroljean)\nforall x (Shoo(x, caroljean) and Shoo(x, brenn) -> Located(x))\nforall x (Isosceles(x) and Afford(x, caroljean) -> Afford(x, brenn))\n\nnot Flux(annissa, caroljean)\n\nIsosceles(annissa) and forall x (Isosceles(x) -> Flux(x, caroljean)) -> therefore Flux(annissa, caroljean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The sibbie tenderize the julianna. The sibbie barf the kiele. The kiele tenderize the sibbie. The kiele is indiscrete. The kiele is libertine. The kiele is daunted. The kiele envenom the sibbie. The kiele barf the markos. The markos tenderize the sibbie. The markos tenderize the kiele. The markos tenderize the julianna. The markos barf the julianna. The julianna is blighted. The julianna is daunted. The julianna barf the kiele. If someone is daunted and they visit the markos then they chase the markos. If someone is indiscrete then they need the markos. If someone envenom the kiele then the kiele barf the julianna. If someone tenderize the sibbie then they chase the markos. If someone is lowbrowed and they visit the julianna then they need the markos. If the markos is indiscrete and the markos barf the julianna then the markos is blighted. If someone tenderize the markos and they chase the sibbie then they are daunted. If someone is indiscrete and they visit the markos then they visit the sibbie. The markos is daunted.", "logic": "\nTenderize(sibbie, julianna)\nBarf(sibbie, kiele)\nTenderize(kiele, sibbie)\nIndiscrete(kiele)\nLibertine(kiele)\nDaunted(kiele)\nEnvenom(kiele, sibbie)\nBarf(kiele, markos)\nTenderize(markos, sibbie)\nTenderize(markos, kiele)\nTenderize(markos, julianna)\nBarf(markos, julianna)\nBlighted(julianna)\nDaunted(julianna)\nBarf(julianna, kiele)\nforall x (Daunted(x) and Barf(x, markos) -> Tenderize(x, markos))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) -> Envenom(x, markos))\nforall x (Envenom(x, kiele) -> Barf(kiele, julianna))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, sibbie) -> Tenderize(x, markos))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) and Barf(x, julianna) -> Envenom(x, markos))\nIndiscrete(markos) and Barf(markos, julianna) -> Blighted(markos)\nforall x (Tenderize(x, markos) and Tenderize(x, sibbie) -> Daunted(x))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) and Barf(x, markos) -> Barf(x, sibbie))\n\nDaunted(markos)\n\nTenderize(markos, sibbie) and forall x (Tenderize(x, sibbie) -> Tenderize(x, markos)) -> therefore Tenderize(markos, markos) Tenderize(markos, markos) and Tenderize(markos, sibbie) and forall x (Tenderize(x, markos) and Tenderize(x, sibbie) -> Daunted(x)) -> therefore Daunted(markos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The moises imbed the ailey. The moises exude the malinde. The malinde imbed the moises. The malinde is coroneted. The malinde is talkative. The malinde is saved. The malinde tunnel the moises. The malinde exude the claus. The claus imbed the moises. The claus imbed the malinde. The claus imbed the ailey. The claus exude the ailey. The ailey is unlisted. The ailey is saved. The ailey exude the malinde. If someone is saved and they visit the claus then they chase the claus. If someone is coroneted then they need the claus. If someone tunnel the malinde then the malinde exude the ailey. If someone imbed the moises then they chase the claus. If someone is corporal and they visit the ailey then they need the claus. If the claus is coroneted and the claus exude the ailey then the claus is unlisted. If someone imbed the claus and they chase the moises then they are saved. If someone is coroneted and they visit the claus then they visit the moises. The claus is not saved.", "logic": "\nImbed(moises, ailey)\nExude(moises, malinde)\nImbed(malinde, moises)\nCoroneted(malinde)\nTalkative(malinde)\nSaved(malinde)\nTunnel(malinde, moises)\nExude(malinde, claus)\nImbed(claus, moises)\nImbed(claus, malinde)\nImbed(claus, ailey)\nExude(claus, ailey)\nUnlisted(ailey)\nSaved(ailey)\nExude(ailey, malinde)\nforall x (Saved(x) and Exude(x, claus) -> Imbed(x, claus))\nforall x (Coroneted(x) -> Tunnel(x, claus))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, malinde) -> Exude(malinde, ailey))\nforall x (Imbed(x, moises) -> Imbed(x, claus))\nforall x (Corporal(x) and Exude(x, ailey) -> Tunnel(x, claus))\nCoroneted(claus) and Exude(claus, ailey) -> Unlisted(claus)\nforall x (Imbed(x, claus) and Imbed(x, moises) -> Saved(x))\nforall x (Coroneted(x) and Exude(x, claus) -> Exude(x, moises))\n\nnot Saved(claus)\n\nImbed(claus, moises) and forall x (Imbed(x, moises) -> Imbed(x, claus)) -> therefore Imbed(claus, claus) Imbed(claus, claus) and Imbed(claus, moises) and forall x (Imbed(x, claus) and Imbed(x, moises) -> Saved(x)) -> therefore Saved(claus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The sam propound the donica. The sam chamfer the janaye. The janaye propound the sam. The janaye is inpouring. The janaye is expandable. The janaye is feigned. The janaye arborise the sam. The janaye chamfer the carole. The carole propound the sam. The carole propound the janaye. The carole propound the donica. The carole chamfer the donica. The donica is colombian. The donica is feigned. The donica chamfer the janaye. If someone is feigned and they visit the carole then they chase the carole. If someone is inpouring then they need the carole. If someone arborise the janaye then the janaye chamfer the donica. If someone propound the sam then they chase the carole. If someone is tantrik and they visit the donica then they need the carole. If the carole is inpouring and the carole chamfer the donica then the carole is colombian. If someone propound the carole and they chase the sam then they are feigned. If someone is inpouring and they visit the carole then they visit the sam. The carole does not need the carole.", "logic": "\nPropound(sam, donica)\nChamfer(sam, janaye)\nPropound(janaye, sam)\nInpouring(janaye)\nExpandable(janaye)\nFeigned(janaye)\nArborise(janaye, sam)\nChamfer(janaye, carole)\nPropound(carole, sam)\nPropound(carole, janaye)\nPropound(carole, donica)\nChamfer(carole, donica)\nColombian(donica)\nFeigned(donica)\nChamfer(donica, janaye)\nforall x (Feigned(x) and Chamfer(x, carole) -> Propound(x, carole))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) -> Arborise(x, carole))\nforall x (Arborise(x, janaye) -> Chamfer(janaye, donica))\nforall x (Propound(x, sam) -> Propound(x, carole))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) and Chamfer(x, donica) -> Arborise(x, carole))\nInpouring(carole) and Chamfer(carole, donica) -> Colombian(carole)\nforall x (Propound(x, carole) and Propound(x, sam) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) and Chamfer(x, carole) -> Chamfer(x, sam))\n\nnot Arborise(carole, carole)\n\nforall x (Inpouring(x) -> Arborise(x, carole)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The letty waken the maddi. The letty bristle the franciska. The franciska waken the letty. The franciska is blurry. The franciska is duncish. The franciska is obliged. The franciska instance the letty. The franciska bristle the catherin. The catherin waken the letty. The catherin waken the franciska. The catherin waken the maddi. The catherin bristle the maddi. The maddi is abstracted. The maddi is obliged. The maddi bristle the franciska. If someone is obliged and they visit the catherin then they chase the catherin. If someone is blurry then they need the catherin. If someone instance the franciska then the franciska bristle the maddi. If someone waken the letty then they chase the catherin. If someone is lifelike and they visit the maddi then they need the catherin. If the catherin is blurry and the catherin bristle the maddi then the catherin is abstracted. If someone waken the catherin and they chase the letty then they are obliged. If someone is blurry and they visit the catherin then they visit the letty. The letty waken the catherin.", "logic": "\nWaken(letty, maddi)\nBristle(letty, franciska)\nWaken(franciska, letty)\nBlurry(franciska)\nDuncish(franciska)\nObliged(franciska)\nInstance(franciska, letty)\nBristle(franciska, catherin)\nWaken(catherin, letty)\nWaken(catherin, franciska)\nWaken(catherin, maddi)\nBristle(catherin, maddi)\nAbstracted(maddi)\nObliged(maddi)\nBristle(maddi, franciska)\nforall x (Obliged(x) and Bristle(x, catherin) -> Waken(x, catherin))\nforall x (Blurry(x) -> Instance(x, catherin))\nforall x (Instance(x, franciska) -> Bristle(franciska, maddi))\nforall x (Waken(x, letty) -> Waken(x, catherin))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Bristle(x, maddi) -> Instance(x, catherin))\nBlurry(catherin) and Bristle(catherin, maddi) -> Abstracted(catherin)\nforall x (Waken(x, catherin) and Waken(x, letty) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Blurry(x) and Bristle(x, catherin) -> Bristle(x, letty))\n\nWaken(letty, catherin)\n\nforall x (Obliged(x) and Bristle(x, catherin) -> Waken(x, catherin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The ofella ring the oralie. The ofella bacterise the michale. The michale ring the ofella. The michale is neonatal. The michale is dutch. The michale is hemophilic. The michale chevy the ofella. The michale bacterise the risa. The risa ring the ofella. The risa ring the michale. The risa ring the oralie. The risa bacterise the oralie. The oralie is zymotic. The oralie is hemophilic. The oralie bacterise the michale. If someone is hemophilic and they visit the risa then they chase the risa. If someone is neonatal then they need the risa. If someone chevy the michale then the michale bacterise the oralie. If someone ring the ofella then they chase the risa. If someone is tousled and they visit the oralie then they need the risa. If the risa is neonatal and the risa bacterise the oralie then the risa is zymotic. If someone ring the risa and they chase the ofella then they are hemophilic. If someone is neonatal and they visit the risa then they visit the ofella. The oralie does not chase the risa.", "logic": "\nRing(ofella, oralie)\nBacterise(ofella, michale)\nRing(michale, ofella)\nNeonatal(michale)\nDutch(michale)\nHemophilic(michale)\nChevy(michale, ofella)\nBacterise(michale, risa)\nRing(risa, ofella)\nRing(risa, michale)\nRing(risa, oralie)\nBacterise(risa, oralie)\nZymotic(oralie)\nHemophilic(oralie)\nBacterise(oralie, michale)\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) and Bacterise(x, risa) -> Ring(x, risa))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Chevy(x, risa))\nforall x (Chevy(x, michale) -> Bacterise(michale, oralie))\nforall x (Ring(x, ofella) -> Ring(x, risa))\nforall x (Tousled(x) and Bacterise(x, oralie) -> Chevy(x, risa))\nNeonatal(risa) and Bacterise(risa, oralie) -> Zymotic(risa)\nforall x (Ring(x, risa) and Ring(x, ofella) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) and Bacterise(x, risa) -> Bacterise(x, ofella))\n\nnot Ring(oralie, risa)\n\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) and Bacterise(x, risa) -> Ring(x, risa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The joelie infect the roderigo. The joelie vein the lilith. The lilith infect the joelie. The lilith is unbloody. The lilith is chian. The lilith is dickensian. The lilith rethink the joelie. The lilith vein the oran. The oran infect the joelie. The oran infect the lilith. The oran infect the roderigo. The oran vein the roderigo. The roderigo is mangey. The roderigo is dickensian. The roderigo vein the lilith. If someone is dickensian and they visit the oran then they chase the oran. If someone is unbloody then they need the oran. If someone rethink the lilith then the lilith vein the roderigo. If someone infect the joelie then they chase the oran. If someone is stylised and they visit the roderigo then they need the oran. If the oran is unbloody and the oran vein the roderigo then the oran is mangey. If someone infect the oran and they chase the joelie then they are dickensian. If someone is unbloody and they visit the oran then they visit the joelie. The lilith infect the lilith.", "logic": "\nInfect(joelie, roderigo)\nVein(joelie, lilith)\nInfect(lilith, joelie)\nUnbloody(lilith)\nChian(lilith)\nDickensian(lilith)\nRethink(lilith, joelie)\nVein(lilith, oran)\nInfect(oran, joelie)\nInfect(oran, lilith)\nInfect(oran, roderigo)\nVein(oran, roderigo)\nMangey(roderigo)\nDickensian(roderigo)\nVein(roderigo, lilith)\nforall x (Dickensian(x) and Vein(x, oran) -> Infect(x, oran))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) -> Rethink(x, oran))\nforall x (Rethink(x, lilith) -> Vein(lilith, roderigo))\nforall x (Infect(x, joelie) -> Infect(x, oran))\nforall x (Stylised(x) and Vein(x, roderigo) -> Rethink(x, oran))\nUnbloody(oran) and Vein(oran, roderigo) -> Mangey(oran)\nforall x (Infect(x, oran) and Infect(x, joelie) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Vein(x, oran) -> Vein(x, joelie))\n\nInfect(lilith, lilith)\n\nInfect(lilith, lilith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The stanly triple the myles. The stanly understate the ransell. The ransell triple the stanly. The ransell is venezuelan. The ransell is fourpenny. The ransell is uplifted. The ransell ripen the stanly. The ransell understate the elfie. The elfie triple the stanly. The elfie triple the ransell. The elfie triple the myles. The elfie understate the myles. The myles is coriaceous. The myles is uplifted. The myles understate the ransell. If someone is uplifted and they visit the elfie then they chase the elfie. If someone is venezuelan then they need the elfie. If someone ripen the ransell then the ransell understate the myles. If someone triple the stanly then they chase the elfie. If someone is tibial and they visit the myles then they need the elfie. If the elfie is venezuelan and the elfie understate the myles then the elfie is coriaceous. If someone triple the elfie and they chase the stanly then they are uplifted. If someone is venezuelan and they visit the elfie then they visit the stanly. The ransell is not tibial.", "logic": "\nTriple(stanly, myles)\nUnderstate(stanly, ransell)\nTriple(ransell, stanly)\nVenezuelan(ransell)\nFourpenny(ransell)\nUplifted(ransell)\nRipen(ransell, stanly)\nUnderstate(ransell, elfie)\nTriple(elfie, stanly)\nTriple(elfie, ransell)\nTriple(elfie, myles)\nUnderstate(elfie, myles)\nCoriaceous(myles)\nUplifted(myles)\nUnderstate(myles, ransell)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) and Understate(x, elfie) -> Triple(x, elfie))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) -> Ripen(x, elfie))\nforall x (Ripen(x, ransell) -> Understate(ransell, myles))\nforall x (Triple(x, stanly) -> Triple(x, elfie))\nforall x (Tibial(x) and Understate(x, myles) -> Ripen(x, elfie))\nVenezuelan(elfie) and Understate(elfie, myles) -> Coriaceous(elfie)\nforall x (Triple(x, elfie) and Triple(x, stanly) -> Uplifted(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and Understate(x, elfie) -> Understate(x, stanly))\n\nnot Tibial(ransell)\n\nnot Tibial(ransell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "The ebeneser gasify the margy. The ebeneser appall the ginni. The ginni gasify the ebeneser. The ginni is antarctic. The ginni is westerly. The ginni is uncanny. The ginni extend the ebeneser. The ginni appall the ivett. The ivett gasify the ebeneser. The ivett gasify the ginni. The ivett gasify the margy. The ivett appall the margy. The margy is subtle. The margy is uncanny. The margy appall the ginni. If someone is uncanny and they visit the ivett then they chase the ivett. If someone is antarctic then they need the ivett. If someone extend the ginni then the ginni appall the margy. If someone gasify the ebeneser then they chase the ivett. If someone is deadened and they visit the margy then they need the ivett. If the ivett is antarctic and the ivett appall the margy then the ivett is subtle. If someone gasify the ivett and they chase the ebeneser then they are uncanny. If someone is antarctic and they visit the ivett then they visit the ebeneser. The margy is deadened.", "logic": "\nGasify(ebeneser, margy)\nAppall(ebeneser, ginni)\nGasify(ginni, ebeneser)\nAntarctic(ginni)\nWesterly(ginni)\nUncanny(ginni)\nExtend(ginni, ebeneser)\nAppall(ginni, ivett)\nGasify(ivett, ebeneser)\nGasify(ivett, ginni)\nGasify(ivett, margy)\nAppall(ivett, margy)\nSubtle(margy)\nUncanny(margy)\nAppall(margy, ginni)\nforall x (Uncanny(x) and Appall(x, ivett) -> Gasify(x, ivett))\nforall x (Antarctic(x) -> Extend(x, ivett))\nforall x (Extend(x, ginni) -> Appall(ginni, margy))\nforall x (Gasify(x, ebeneser) -> Gasify(x, ivett))\nforall x (Deadened(x) and Appall(x, margy) -> Extend(x, ivett))\nAntarctic(ivett) and Appall(ivett, margy) -> Subtle(ivett)\nforall x (Gasify(x, ivett) and Gasify(x, ebeneser) -> Uncanny(x))\nforall x (Antarctic(x) and Appall(x, ivett) -> Appall(x, ebeneser))\n\nDeadened(margy)\n\nDeadened(margy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-328"} {"premises": "Corabel is entangled. Corabel is radical. Corabel is omissive. Baillie is thundery. Baillie is entangled. Baillie is radical. Baillie is omissive. Baillie is kenyan. Baillie is henpecked. Baillie is boozy. Jacklin is thundery. Jacklin is entangled. Jacklin is kenyan. Jacklin is henpecked. Jacklin is boozy. If someone is henpecked then they are thundery. If someone is omissive and radical then they are henpecked. Jacklin is entangled.", "logic": "\nEntangled(corabel)\nRadical(corabel)\nOmissive(corabel)\nThundery(baillie)\nEntangled(baillie)\nRadical(baillie)\nOmissive(baillie)\nKenyan(baillie)\nHenpecked(baillie)\nBoozy(baillie)\nThundery(jacklin)\nEntangled(jacklin)\nKenyan(jacklin)\nHenpecked(jacklin)\nBoozy(jacklin)\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Thundery(x))\nforall x (Omissive(x) and Radical(x) -> Henpecked(x))\n\nEntangled(jacklin)\n\ntherefore Entangled(jacklin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Sophia is gallant. Sophia is stagnant. Sophia is soignee. Jorrie is vaned. Jorrie is gallant. Jorrie is stagnant. Jorrie is soignee. Jorrie is agog. Jorrie is unstilted. Jorrie is strapping. Roxana is vaned. Roxana is gallant. Roxana is agog. Roxana is unstilted. Roxana is strapping. If someone is unstilted then they are vaned. If someone is soignee and stagnant then they are unstilted. Jorrie is not unstilted.", "logic": "\nGallant(sophia)\nStagnant(sophia)\nSoignee(sophia)\nVaned(jorrie)\nGallant(jorrie)\nStagnant(jorrie)\nSoignee(jorrie)\nAgog(jorrie)\nUnstilted(jorrie)\nStrapping(jorrie)\nVaned(roxana)\nGallant(roxana)\nAgog(roxana)\nUnstilted(roxana)\nStrapping(roxana)\nforall x (Unstilted(x) -> Vaned(x))\nforall x (Soignee(x) and Stagnant(x) -> Unstilted(x))\n\nnot Unstilted(jorrie)\n\ntherefore Unstilted(jorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Cybel is officious. Cybel is size. Cybel is likeable. Suzetta is lenient. Suzetta is officious. Suzetta is size. Suzetta is likeable. Suzetta is dabbled. Suzetta is climatical. Suzetta is solomonic. Anselm is lenient. Anselm is officious. Anselm is dabbled. Anselm is climatical. Anselm is solomonic. If someone is climatical then they are lenient. If someone is likeable and size then they are climatical. Cybel is climatical.", "logic": "\nOfficious(cybel)\nSize(cybel)\nLikeable(cybel)\nLenient(suzetta)\nOfficious(suzetta)\nSize(suzetta)\nLikeable(suzetta)\nDabbled(suzetta)\nClimatical(suzetta)\nSolomonic(suzetta)\nLenient(anselm)\nOfficious(anselm)\nDabbled(anselm)\nClimatical(anselm)\nSolomonic(anselm)\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> Lenient(x))\nforall x (Likeable(x) and Size(x) -> Climatical(x))\n\nClimatical(cybel)\n\nLikeable(cybel) and Size(cybel) and forall x (Likeable(x) and Size(x) -> Climatical(x)) -> therefore Climatical(cybel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Alameda is cerous. Alameda is slubbed. Alameda is botonnee. Merry is womanly. Merry is cerous. Merry is slubbed. Merry is botonnee. Merry is municipal. Merry is depictive. Merry is totalistic. Ravil is womanly. Ravil is cerous. Ravil is municipal. Ravil is depictive. Ravil is totalistic. If someone is depictive then they are womanly. If someone is botonnee and slubbed then they are depictive. Alameda is not depictive.", "logic": "\nCerous(alameda)\nSlubbed(alameda)\nBotonnee(alameda)\nWomanly(merry)\nCerous(merry)\nSlubbed(merry)\nBotonnee(merry)\nMunicipal(merry)\nDepictive(merry)\nTotalistic(merry)\nWomanly(ravil)\nCerous(ravil)\nMunicipal(ravil)\nDepictive(ravil)\nTotalistic(ravil)\nforall x (Depictive(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Botonnee(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Depictive(x))\n\nnot Depictive(alameda)\n\nBotonnee(alameda) and Slubbed(alameda) and forall x (Botonnee(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Depictive(x)) -> therefore Depictive(alameda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Gena is sonorous. Gena is frenetic. Gena is unbaffled. Vina is reverse. Vina is sonorous. Vina is frenetic. Vina is unbaffled. Vina is levantine. Vina is calceolate. Vina is blotched. Piet is reverse. Piet is sonorous. Piet is levantine. Piet is calceolate. Piet is blotched. If someone is calceolate then they are reverse. If someone is unbaffled and frenetic then they are calceolate. Gena is reverse.", "logic": "\nSonorous(gena)\nFrenetic(gena)\nUnbaffled(gena)\nReverse(vina)\nSonorous(vina)\nFrenetic(vina)\nUnbaffled(vina)\nLevantine(vina)\nCalceolate(vina)\nBlotched(vina)\nReverse(piet)\nSonorous(piet)\nLevantine(piet)\nCalceolate(piet)\nBlotched(piet)\nforall x (Calceolate(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Calceolate(x))\n\nReverse(gena)\n\nUnbaffled(gena) and Frenetic(gena) and forall x (Unbaffled(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Calceolate(x)) -> therefore Calceolate(gena) Calceolate(gena) and forall x (Calceolate(x) -> Reverse(x)) -> therefore Reverse(gena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Happy is thenal. Happy is lipless. Happy is rubicund. Tandy is under. Tandy is thenal. Tandy is lipless. Tandy is rubicund. Tandy is layered. Tandy is bruising. Tandy is antiviral. Rozamond is under. Rozamond is thenal. Rozamond is layered. Rozamond is bruising. Rozamond is antiviral. If someone is bruising then they are under. If someone is rubicund and lipless then they are bruising. Happy is not under.", "logic": "\nThenal(happy)\nLipless(happy)\nRubicund(happy)\nUnder(tandy)\nThenal(tandy)\nLipless(tandy)\nRubicund(tandy)\nLayered(tandy)\nBruising(tandy)\nAntiviral(tandy)\nUnder(rozamond)\nThenal(rozamond)\nLayered(rozamond)\nBruising(rozamond)\nAntiviral(rozamond)\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) and Lipless(x) -> Bruising(x))\n\nnot Under(happy)\n\nRubicund(happy) and Lipless(happy) and forall x (Rubicund(x) and Lipless(x) -> Bruising(x)) -> therefore Bruising(happy) Bruising(happy) and forall x (Bruising(x) -> Under(x)) -> therefore Under(happy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Hana is granitic. Hana is plenteous. Hana is bald. Marve is seaworthy. Marve is granitic. Marve is plenteous. Marve is bald. Marve is oldline. Marve is laconic. Marve is loved. Romola is seaworthy. Romola is granitic. Romola is oldline. Romola is laconic. Romola is loved. If someone is laconic then they are seaworthy. If someone is bald and plenteous then they are laconic. Romola is not bald.", "logic": "\nGranitic(hana)\nPlenteous(hana)\nBald(hana)\nSeaworthy(marve)\nGranitic(marve)\nPlenteous(marve)\nBald(marve)\nOldline(marve)\nLaconic(marve)\nLoved(marve)\nSeaworthy(romola)\nGranitic(romola)\nOldline(romola)\nLaconic(romola)\nLoved(romola)\nforall x (Laconic(x) -> Seaworthy(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Plenteous(x) -> Laconic(x))\n\nnot Bald(romola)\n\nnot Bald(romola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Kath is peruvian. Kath is adscript. Kath is warmed. Francoise is interwoven. Francoise is peruvian. Francoise is adscript. Francoise is warmed. Francoise is vaccinated. Francoise is adenoidal. Francoise is assumed. Brigitte is interwoven. Brigitte is peruvian. Brigitte is vaccinated. Brigitte is adenoidal. Brigitte is assumed. If someone is adenoidal then they are interwoven. If someone is warmed and adscript then they are adenoidal. Kath is vaccinated.", "logic": "\nPeruvian(kath)\nAdscript(kath)\nWarmed(kath)\nInterwoven(francoise)\nPeruvian(francoise)\nAdscript(francoise)\nWarmed(francoise)\nVaccinated(francoise)\nAdenoidal(francoise)\nAssumed(francoise)\nInterwoven(brigitte)\nPeruvian(brigitte)\nVaccinated(brigitte)\nAdenoidal(brigitte)\nAssumed(brigitte)\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Interwoven(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) and Adscript(x) -> Adenoidal(x))\n\nVaccinated(kath)\n\nVaccinated(kath) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Ethelyn is fibreoptic. Ethelyn is obliging. Ethelyn is isotopic. Greggory is aperiodic. Greggory is fibreoptic. Greggory is obliging. Greggory is isotopic. Greggory is asymptotic. Greggory is outer. Greggory is addable. Leanne is aperiodic. Leanne is fibreoptic. Leanne is asymptotic. Leanne is outer. Leanne is addable. If someone is outer then they are aperiodic. If someone is isotopic and obliging then they are outer. Ethelyn is not addable.", "logic": "\nFibreoptic(ethelyn)\nObliging(ethelyn)\nIsotopic(ethelyn)\nAperiodic(greggory)\nFibreoptic(greggory)\nObliging(greggory)\nIsotopic(greggory)\nAsymptotic(greggory)\nOuter(greggory)\nAddable(greggory)\nAperiodic(leanne)\nFibreoptic(leanne)\nAsymptotic(leanne)\nOuter(leanne)\nAddable(leanne)\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Isotopic(x) and Obliging(x) -> Outer(x))\n\nnot Addable(ethelyn)\n\nnot Addable(ethelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Patrick is askant. Patrick is apogamous. Patrick is needed. Lisetta is guilty. Lisetta is askant. Lisetta is apogamous. Lisetta is needed. Lisetta is resinlike. Lisetta is amebic. Lisetta is unexampled. Sibylle is guilty. Sibylle is askant. Sibylle is resinlike. Sibylle is amebic. Sibylle is unexampled. If someone is amebic then they are guilty. If someone is needed and apogamous then they are amebic. Sibylle is apogamous.", "logic": "\nAskant(patrick)\nApogamous(patrick)\nNeeded(patrick)\nGuilty(lisetta)\nAskant(lisetta)\nApogamous(lisetta)\nNeeded(lisetta)\nResinlike(lisetta)\nAmebic(lisetta)\nUnexampled(lisetta)\nGuilty(sibylle)\nAskant(sibylle)\nResinlike(sibylle)\nAmebic(sibylle)\nUnexampled(sibylle)\nforall x (Amebic(x) -> Guilty(x))\nforall x (Needed(x) and Apogamous(x) -> Amebic(x))\n\nApogamous(sibylle)\n\nApogamous(sibylle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-702"} {"premises": "Johnny is attrited. Johnny is not mindless. Johnny is fatigued. Shelby is emphasised. Shelby is mindless. Shelby is fatigued. Shelby is agrypnotic. Tarrant is mindless. Michell is obsessive. Michell is fatigued. Young things are mindless. All obsessive things are mindless. Smart, attrited things are not mindless. All mindless things are fatigued. If something is attrited and agrypnotic then it is emphasised. Quiet things are emphasised. If something is unflurried and fatigued then it is attrited. If something is unflurried then it is not agrypnotic. Michell is fatigued.", "logic": "\nAttrited(johnny)\nnot Mindless(johnny)\nFatigued(johnny)\nEmphasised(shelby)\nMindless(shelby)\nFatigued(shelby)\nAgrypnotic(shelby)\nMindless(tarrant)\nObsessive(michell)\nFatigued(michell)\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Obsessive(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) and Attrited(x) -> not Mindless(x))\nforall x (Mindless(x) -> Fatigued(x))\nforall x (Attrited(x) and Agrypnotic(x) -> Emphasised(x))\nforall x (Mindless(x) -> Emphasised(x))\nforall x (Unflurried(x) and Fatigued(x) -> Attrited(x))\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> not Agrypnotic(x))\n\nFatigued(michell)\n\ntherefore Fatigued(michell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Hester is appetizing. Hester is not impassable. Hester is different. Teane is lexical. Teane is impassable. Teane is different. Teane is despicable. Bidget is impassable. Erma is invitatory. Erma is different. Young things are impassable. All invitatory things are impassable. Smart, appetizing things are not impassable. All impassable things are different. If something is appetizing and despicable then it is lexical. Quiet things are lexical. If something is marmoreal and different then it is appetizing. If something is marmoreal then it is not despicable. Hester is not different.", "logic": "\nAppetizing(hester)\nnot Impassable(hester)\nDifferent(hester)\nLexical(teane)\nImpassable(teane)\nDifferent(teane)\nDespicable(teane)\nImpassable(bidget)\nInvitatory(erma)\nDifferent(erma)\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Impassable(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Impassable(x))\nforall x (Despicable(x) and Appetizing(x) -> not Impassable(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Different(x))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and Despicable(x) -> Lexical(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Lexical(x))\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) and Different(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> not Despicable(x))\n\nnot Different(hester)\n\ntherefore Different(hester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Nisa is thenar. Nisa is not pleasing. Nisa is blastemal. Zacherie is joined. Zacherie is pleasing. Zacherie is blastemal. Zacherie is schizoid. Melamie is pleasing. Shanon is unsuasible. Shanon is blastemal. Young things are pleasing. All unsuasible things are pleasing. Smart, thenar things are not pleasing. All pleasing things are blastemal. If something is thenar and schizoid then it is joined. Quiet things are joined. If something is cephalic and blastemal then it is thenar. If something is cephalic then it is not schizoid. Melamie is joined.", "logic": "\nThenar(nisa)\nnot Pleasing(nisa)\nBlastemal(nisa)\nJoined(zacherie)\nPleasing(zacherie)\nBlastemal(zacherie)\nSchizoid(zacherie)\nPleasing(melamie)\nUnsuasible(shanon)\nBlastemal(shanon)\nforall x (Cephalic(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Schizoid(x) and Thenar(x) -> not Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Blastemal(x))\nforall x (Thenar(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Joined(x))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Joined(x))\nforall x (Cephalic(x) and Blastemal(x) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Cephalic(x) -> not Schizoid(x))\n\nJoined(melamie)\n\nPleasing(melamie) and forall x (Pleasing(x) -> Joined(x)) -> therefore Joined(melamie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Daryl is deficient. Daryl is not ownerless. Daryl is refractile. Meryl is calibrated. Meryl is ownerless. Meryl is refractile. Meryl is concentric. Corabelle is ownerless. Xenos is exothermal. Xenos is refractile. Young things are ownerless. All exothermal things are ownerless. Smart, deficient things are not ownerless. All ownerless things are refractile. If something is deficient and concentric then it is calibrated. Quiet things are calibrated. If something is fertile and refractile then it is deficient. If something is fertile then it is not concentric. Corabelle is not refractile.", "logic": "\nDeficient(daryl)\nnot Ownerless(daryl)\nRefractile(daryl)\nCalibrated(meryl)\nOwnerless(meryl)\nRefractile(meryl)\nConcentric(meryl)\nOwnerless(corabelle)\nExothermal(xenos)\nRefractile(xenos)\nforall x (Fertile(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Exothermal(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) and Deficient(x) -> not Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Refractile(x))\nforall x (Deficient(x) and Concentric(x) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Fertile(x) and Refractile(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Fertile(x) -> not Concentric(x))\n\nnot Refractile(corabelle)\n\nOwnerless(corabelle) and forall x (Ownerless(x) -> Refractile(x)) -> therefore Refractile(corabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Alli is mephitic. Alli is not jolly. Alli is punitory. Gisele is fuggy. Gisele is jolly. Gisele is punitory. Gisele is frustrated. Henrietta is jolly. Vonny is vigesimal. Vonny is punitory. Young things are jolly. All vigesimal things are jolly. Smart, mephitic things are not jolly. All jolly things are punitory. If something is mephitic and frustrated then it is fuggy. Quiet things are fuggy. If something is afire and punitory then it is mephitic. If something is afire then it is not frustrated. Vonny is fuggy.", "logic": "\nMephitic(alli)\nnot Jolly(alli)\nPunitory(alli)\nFuggy(gisele)\nJolly(gisele)\nPunitory(gisele)\nFrustrated(gisele)\nJolly(henrietta)\nVigesimal(vonny)\nPunitory(vonny)\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Jolly(x))\nforall x (Vigesimal(x) -> Jolly(x))\nforall x (Frustrated(x) and Mephitic(x) -> not Jolly(x))\nforall x (Jolly(x) -> Punitory(x))\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and Frustrated(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Jolly(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and Punitory(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) -> not Frustrated(x))\n\nFuggy(vonny)\n\nVigesimal(vonny) and forall x (Vigesimal(x) -> Jolly(x)) -> therefore Jolly(vonny) Jolly(vonny) and forall x (Jolly(x) -> Fuggy(x)) -> therefore Fuggy(vonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Charisse is sweet. Charisse is not smudgy. Charisse is allelic. Conni is easy. Conni is smudgy. Conni is allelic. Conni is cheesy. Praneetf is smudgy. Colly is identified. Colly is allelic. Young things are smudgy. All identified things are smudgy. Smart, sweet things are not smudgy. All smudgy things are allelic. If something is sweet and cheesy then it is easy. Quiet things are easy. If something is sloughy and allelic then it is sweet. If something is sloughy then it is not cheesy. Colly is not easy.", "logic": "\nSweet(charisse)\nnot Smudgy(charisse)\nAllelic(charisse)\nEasy(conni)\nSmudgy(conni)\nAllelic(conni)\nCheesy(conni)\nSmudgy(praneetf)\nIdentified(colly)\nAllelic(colly)\nforall x (Sloughy(x) -> Smudgy(x))\nforall x (Identified(x) -> Smudgy(x))\nforall x (Cheesy(x) and Sweet(x) -> not Smudgy(x))\nforall x (Smudgy(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Sweet(x) and Cheesy(x) -> Easy(x))\nforall x (Smudgy(x) -> Easy(x))\nforall x (Sloughy(x) and Allelic(x) -> Sweet(x))\nforall x (Sloughy(x) -> not Cheesy(x))\n\nnot Easy(colly)\n\nIdentified(colly) and forall x (Identified(x) -> Smudgy(x)) -> therefore Smudgy(colly) Smudgy(colly) and forall x (Smudgy(x) -> Easy(x)) -> therefore Easy(colly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Pearle is skilful. Pearle is not compliant. Pearle is salacious. Ronald is cyprinoid. Ronald is compliant. Ronald is salacious. Ronald is rumansh. Nanine is compliant. Rabbi is shapeless. Rabbi is salacious. Young things are compliant. All shapeless things are compliant. Smart, skilful things are not compliant. All compliant things are salacious. If something is skilful and rumansh then it is cyprinoid. Quiet things are cyprinoid. If something is feckless and salacious then it is skilful. If something is feckless then it is not rumansh. Nanine is not skilful.", "logic": "\nSkilful(pearle)\nnot Compliant(pearle)\nSalacious(pearle)\nCyprinoid(ronald)\nCompliant(ronald)\nSalacious(ronald)\nRumansh(ronald)\nCompliant(nanine)\nShapeless(rabbi)\nSalacious(rabbi)\nforall x (Feckless(x) -> Compliant(x))\nforall x (Shapeless(x) -> Compliant(x))\nforall x (Rumansh(x) and Skilful(x) -> not Compliant(x))\nforall x (Compliant(x) -> Salacious(x))\nforall x (Skilful(x) and Rumansh(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Compliant(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Feckless(x) and Salacious(x) -> Skilful(x))\nforall x (Feckless(x) -> not Rumansh(x))\n\nnot Skilful(nanine)\n\nforall x (Feckless(x) and Salacious(x) -> Skilful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Seka is alienating. Seka is not champleve. Seka is unlamented. Almeda is stenotic. Almeda is champleve. Almeda is unlamented. Almeda is slithering. Abdel is champleve. Alina is pessimum. Alina is unlamented. Young things are champleve. All pessimum things are champleve. Smart, alienating things are not champleve. All champleve things are unlamented. If something is alienating and slithering then it is stenotic. Quiet things are stenotic. If something is inner and unlamented then it is alienating. If something is inner then it is not slithering. Alina is alienating.", "logic": "\nAlienating(seka)\nnot Champleve(seka)\nUnlamented(seka)\nStenotic(almeda)\nChampleve(almeda)\nUnlamented(almeda)\nSlithering(almeda)\nChampleve(abdel)\nPessimum(alina)\nUnlamented(alina)\nforall x (Inner(x) -> Champleve(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Champleve(x))\nforall x (Slithering(x) and Alienating(x) -> not Champleve(x))\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) and Slithering(x) -> Stenotic(x))\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Stenotic(x))\nforall x (Inner(x) and Unlamented(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Inner(x) -> not Slithering(x))\n\nAlienating(alina)\n\nforall x (Inner(x) and Unlamented(x) -> Alienating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Joete is recent. Joete is not ballistic. Joete is slivery. Ellen is retarded. Ellen is ballistic. Ellen is slivery. Ellen is sequined. Reinhold is ballistic. Leonie is exogamous. Leonie is slivery. Young things are ballistic. All exogamous things are ballistic. Smart, recent things are not ballistic. All ballistic things are slivery. If something is recent and sequined then it is retarded. Quiet things are retarded. If something is peruvian and slivery then it is recent. If something is peruvian then it is not sequined. Joete is not retarded.", "logic": "\nRecent(joete)\nnot Ballistic(joete)\nSlivery(joete)\nRetarded(ellen)\nBallistic(ellen)\nSlivery(ellen)\nSequined(ellen)\nBallistic(reinhold)\nExogamous(leonie)\nSlivery(leonie)\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Sequined(x) and Recent(x) -> not Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Slivery(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Sequined(x) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Peruvian(x) and Slivery(x) -> Recent(x))\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> not Sequined(x))\n\nnot Retarded(joete)\n\nforall x (Recent(x) and Sequined(x) -> Retarded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Nichol is sectarian. Nichol is not springlike. Nichol is pendant. Lay is unspoken. Lay is springlike. Lay is pendant. Lay is bigamous. Emmalynn is springlike. Lea is marauding. Lea is pendant. Young things are springlike. All marauding things are springlike. Smart, sectarian things are not springlike. All springlike things are pendant. If something is sectarian and bigamous then it is unspoken. Quiet things are unspoken. If something is accented and pendant then it is sectarian. If something is accented then it is not bigamous. Lay is marauding.", "logic": "\nSectarian(nichol)\nnot Springlike(nichol)\nPendant(nichol)\nUnspoken(lay)\nSpringlike(lay)\nPendant(lay)\nBigamous(lay)\nSpringlike(emmalynn)\nMarauding(lea)\nPendant(lea)\nforall x (Accented(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Marauding(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Bigamous(x) and Sectarian(x) -> not Springlike(x))\nforall x (Springlike(x) -> Pendant(x))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) and Bigamous(x) -> Unspoken(x))\nforall x (Springlike(x) -> Unspoken(x))\nforall x (Accented(x) and Pendant(x) -> Sectarian(x))\nforall x (Accented(x) -> not Bigamous(x))\n\nMarauding(lay)\n\nMarauding(lay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Jannel is vicinal. Jannel is not astylar. Jannel is dreamed. Charlotte is estrogenic. Charlotte is astylar. Charlotte is dreamed. Charlotte is shed. Ricard is astylar. Orren is amber. Orren is dreamed. Young things are astylar. All amber things are astylar. Smart, vicinal things are not astylar. All astylar things are dreamed. If something is vicinal and shed then it is estrogenic. Quiet things are estrogenic. If something is aglow and dreamed then it is vicinal. If something is aglow then it is not shed. Ricard is not aglow.", "logic": "\nVicinal(jannel)\nnot Astylar(jannel)\nDreamed(jannel)\nEstrogenic(charlotte)\nAstylar(charlotte)\nDreamed(charlotte)\nShed(charlotte)\nAstylar(ricard)\nAmber(orren)\nDreamed(orren)\nforall x (Aglow(x) -> Astylar(x))\nforall x (Amber(x) -> Astylar(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) and Vicinal(x) -> not Astylar(x))\nforall x (Astylar(x) -> Dreamed(x))\nforall x (Vicinal(x) and Shed(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Astylar(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Aglow(x) and Dreamed(x) -> Vicinal(x))\nforall x (Aglow(x) -> not Shed(x))\n\nnot Aglow(ricard)\n\nnot Aglow(ricard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Winthrop is dermic. Winthrop is not usable. Winthrop is carbonylic. Hasheem is ungual. Hasheem is usable. Hasheem is carbonylic. Hasheem is barbarian. Garvy is usable. Kimberlyn is bigmouthed. Kimberlyn is carbonylic. Young things are usable. All bigmouthed things are usable. Smart, dermic things are not usable. All usable things are carbonylic. If something is dermic and barbarian then it is ungual. Quiet things are ungual. If something is palish and carbonylic then it is dermic. If something is palish then it is not barbarian. Kimberlyn is barbarian.", "logic": "\nDermic(winthrop)\nnot Usable(winthrop)\nCarbonylic(winthrop)\nUngual(hasheem)\nUsable(hasheem)\nCarbonylic(hasheem)\nBarbarian(hasheem)\nUsable(garvy)\nBigmouthed(kimberlyn)\nCarbonylic(kimberlyn)\nforall x (Palish(x) -> Usable(x))\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Usable(x))\nforall x (Barbarian(x) and Dermic(x) -> not Usable(x))\nforall x (Usable(x) -> Carbonylic(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) and Barbarian(x) -> Ungual(x))\nforall x (Usable(x) -> Ungual(x))\nforall x (Palish(x) and Carbonylic(x) -> Dermic(x))\nforall x (Palish(x) -> not Barbarian(x))\n\nBarbarian(kimberlyn)\n\nBarbarian(kimberlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Tova is anaclitic. Wilek is apian. Kendall is anaclitic. Ruthe is askant. All askant things are anaclitic. If something is anaclitic and askant then it is snakelike. Kendall is anaclitic.", "logic": "\nAnaclitic(tova)\nApian(wilek)\nAnaclitic(kendall)\nAskant(ruthe)\nforall x (Askant(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and Askant(x) -> Snakelike(x))\n\nAnaclitic(kendall)\n\ntherefore Anaclitic(kendall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Fawnia is magnetised. Rodrigo is nonracial. Robinetta is magnetised. Ada is foul. All foul things are magnetised. If something is magnetised and foul then it is included. Robinetta is not magnetised.", "logic": "\nMagnetised(fawnia)\nNonracial(rodrigo)\nMagnetised(robinetta)\nFoul(ada)\nforall x (Foul(x) -> Magnetised(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) and Foul(x) -> Included(x))\n\nnot Magnetised(robinetta)\n\ntherefore Magnetised(robinetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Randi is unlighted. Fran is housebound. Josefa is unlighted. Eddi is plentiful. All plentiful things are unlighted. If something is unlighted and plentiful then it is amerind. Eddi is unlighted.", "logic": "\nUnlighted(randi)\nHousebound(fran)\nUnlighted(josefa)\nPlentiful(eddi)\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> Unlighted(x))\nforall x (Unlighted(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Amerind(x))\n\nUnlighted(eddi)\n\nPlentiful(eddi) and forall x (Plentiful(x) -> Unlighted(x)) -> therefore Unlighted(eddi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Woody is bimetal. Mireielle is bimestrial. Lucius is bimetal. Staford is girlish. All girlish things are bimetal. If something is bimetal and girlish then it is ignescent. Staford is not bimetal.", "logic": "\nBimetal(woody)\nBimestrial(mireielle)\nBimetal(lucius)\nGirlish(staford)\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Bimetal(x) and Girlish(x) -> Ignescent(x))\n\nnot Bimetal(staford)\n\nGirlish(staford) and forall x (Girlish(x) -> Bimetal(x)) -> therefore Bimetal(staford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Matthias is capable. Etheline is unguarded. Jerri is capable. Reggi is mated. All mated things are capable. If something is capable and mated then it is minty. Reggi is minty.", "logic": "\nCapable(matthias)\nUnguarded(etheline)\nCapable(jerri)\nMated(reggi)\nforall x (Mated(x) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and Mated(x) -> Minty(x))\n\nMinty(reggi)\n\nMated(reggi) and forall x (Mated(x) -> Capable(x)) -> therefore Capable(reggi) Capable(reggi) and Mated(reggi) and forall x (Capable(x) and Mated(x) -> Minty(x)) -> therefore Minty(reggi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Lettie is atlantic. Chastity is willowy. Prentiss is atlantic. Tymothy is unwashed. All unwashed things are atlantic. If something is atlantic and unwashed then it is liplike. Tymothy is not liplike.", "logic": "\nAtlantic(lettie)\nWillowy(chastity)\nAtlantic(prentiss)\nUnwashed(tymothy)\nforall x (Unwashed(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) and Unwashed(x) -> Liplike(x))\n\nnot Liplike(tymothy)\n\nUnwashed(tymothy) and forall x (Unwashed(x) -> Atlantic(x)) -> therefore Atlantic(tymothy) Atlantic(tymothy) and Unwashed(tymothy) and forall x (Atlantic(x) and Unwashed(x) -> Liplike(x)) -> therefore Liplike(tymothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Madella is peruked. Bonni is autarchic. Gerianna is peruked. Kendall is jocular. All jocular things are peruked. If something is peruked and jocular then it is diverted. Madella is not diverted.", "logic": "\nPeruked(madella)\nAutarchic(bonni)\nPeruked(gerianna)\nJocular(kendall)\nforall x (Jocular(x) -> Peruked(x))\nforall x (Peruked(x) and Jocular(x) -> Diverted(x))\n\nnot Diverted(madella)\n\nforall x (Peruked(x) and Jocular(x) -> Diverted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Reginauld is panicked. Magda is burnable. Guinna is panicked. Anabelle is euphoric. All euphoric things are panicked. If something is panicked and euphoric then it is clitoric. Magda is clitoric.", "logic": "\nPanicked(reginauld)\nBurnable(magda)\nPanicked(guinna)\nEuphoric(anabelle)\nforall x (Euphoric(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) and Euphoric(x) -> Clitoric(x))\n\nClitoric(magda)\n\nforall x (Panicked(x) and Euphoric(x) -> Clitoric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Sharlene is dwarfish. Raychel is hymenal. Jessalin is dwarfish. Carlyle is diploid. All diploid things are dwarfish. If something is dwarfish and diploid then it is soled. Raychel is not dwarfish.", "logic": "\nDwarfish(sharlene)\nHymenal(raychel)\nDwarfish(jessalin)\nDiploid(carlyle)\nforall x (Diploid(x) -> Dwarfish(x))\nforall x (Dwarfish(x) and Diploid(x) -> Soled(x))\n\nnot Dwarfish(raychel)\n\nforall x (Diploid(x) -> Dwarfish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Puff is bacteremic. Evie is ecumenic. Artie is bacteremic. Margeaux is unneeded. All unneeded things are bacteremic. If something is bacteremic and unneeded then it is diffusing. Puff is big.", "logic": "\nBacteremic(puff)\nEcumenic(evie)\nBacteremic(artie)\nUnneeded(margeaux)\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> Bacteremic(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) and Unneeded(x) -> Diffusing(x))\n\nBig(puff)\n\nBig(puff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Hamid is unsettled. Sidonia is motile. Haily is unsettled. Merrilee is basophilic. All basophilic things are unsettled. If something is unsettled and basophilic then it is amort. Haily is not basophilic.", "logic": "\nUnsettled(hamid)\nMotile(sidonia)\nUnsettled(haily)\nBasophilic(merrilee)\nforall x (Basophilic(x) -> Unsettled(x))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) and Basophilic(x) -> Amort(x))\n\nnot Basophilic(haily)\n\nnot Basophilic(haily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Melisa is million. Erek is isolating. Barbara is million. Perceval is riskless. All riskless things are million. If something is million and riskless then it is outright. Perceval is big.", "logic": "\nMillion(melisa)\nIsolating(erek)\nMillion(barbara)\nRiskless(perceval)\nforall x (Riskless(x) -> Million(x))\nforall x (Million(x) and Riskless(x) -> Outright(x))\n\nBig(perceval)\n\nBig(perceval) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1286"} {"premises": "Keenan is tannic. Keenan is foamy. Keenan is opulent. All romani things are supple. Blue things are romani. Keenan is opulent.", "logic": "\nTannic(keenan)\nFoamy(keenan)\nOpulent(keenan)\nforall x (Romani(x) -> Supple(x))\nforall x (Tannic(x) -> Romani(x))\n\nOpulent(keenan)\n\ntherefore Opulent(keenan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Ethelyn is unshoed. Ethelyn is pacifist. Ethelyn is swinging. All unmanly things are unbalanced. Blue things are unmanly. Ethelyn is not pacifist.", "logic": "\nUnshoed(ethelyn)\nPacifist(ethelyn)\nSwinging(ethelyn)\nforall x (Unmanly(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) -> Unmanly(x))\n\nnot Pacifist(ethelyn)\n\ntherefore Pacifist(ethelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Karee is addled. Karee is lopsided. Karee is sanguine. All mint things are festive. Blue things are mint. Karee is mint.", "logic": "\nAddled(karee)\nLopsided(karee)\nSanguine(karee)\nforall x (Mint(x) -> Festive(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) -> Mint(x))\n\nMint(karee)\n\nAddled(karee) and forall x (Addled(x) -> Mint(x)) -> therefore Mint(karee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Nicki is skilful. Nicki is lumpy. Nicki is rightist. All bashful things are fluvial. Blue things are bashful. Nicki is not bashful.", "logic": "\nSkilful(nicki)\nLumpy(nicki)\nRightist(nicki)\nforall x (Bashful(x) -> Fluvial(x))\nforall x (Skilful(x) -> Bashful(x))\n\nnot Bashful(nicki)\n\nSkilful(nicki) and forall x (Skilful(x) -> Bashful(x)) -> therefore Bashful(nicki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Almire is ostensive. Almire is cleavable. Almire is enlivened. All collateral things are panicked. Blue things are collateral. Almire is panicked.", "logic": "\nOstensive(almire)\nCleavable(almire)\nEnlivened(almire)\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Ostensive(x) -> Collateral(x))\n\nPanicked(almire)\n\nOstensive(almire) and forall x (Ostensive(x) -> Collateral(x)) -> therefore Collateral(almire) Collateral(almire) and forall x (Collateral(x) -> Panicked(x)) -> therefore Panicked(almire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Leonidas is erose. Leonidas is afloat. Leonidas is frightful. All sibilant things are spiffing. Blue things are sibilant. Leonidas is not spiffing.", "logic": "\nErose(leonidas)\nAfloat(leonidas)\nFrightful(leonidas)\nforall x (Sibilant(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) -> Sibilant(x))\n\nnot Spiffing(leonidas)\n\nErose(leonidas) and forall x (Erose(x) -> Sibilant(x)) -> therefore Sibilant(leonidas) Sibilant(leonidas) and forall x (Sibilant(x) -> Spiffing(x)) -> therefore Spiffing(leonidas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Neysa is polydactyl. Neysa is supposable. Neysa is crispate. All choleraic things are metacarpal. Blue things are choleraic. Neysa is not red.", "logic": "\nPolydactyl(neysa)\nSupposable(neysa)\nCrispate(neysa)\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Choleraic(x))\n\nnot Red(neysa)\n\nnot Red(neysa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Eolande is waxen. Eolande is homemade. Eolande is ironed. All pent things are archaean. Blue things are pent. Eolande is kind.", "logic": "\nWaxen(eolande)\nHomemade(eolande)\nIroned(eolande)\nforall x (Pent(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Waxen(x) -> Pent(x))\n\nKind(eolande)\n\nKind(eolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1993"} {"premises": "Kippie is not canescent. Kippie is enviable. Greg is artificial. All enviable things are winglike. All winglike things are not sensory. If Kippie is not winglike then Kippie is victimized. Kippie is not canescent.", "logic": "\nnot Canescent(kippie)\nEnviable(kippie)\nArtificial(greg)\nforall x (Enviable(x) -> Winglike(x))\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> not Sensory(x))\nnot Winglike(kippie) -> Victimized(kippie)\n\nnot Canescent(kippie)\n\ntherefore not Canescent(kippie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Kore is not vitreous. Kore is capitular. Katrinka is gilbertian. All capitular things are dismantled. All dismantled things are not flaunty. If Kore is not dismantled then Kore is anglican. Kore is vitreous.", "logic": "\nnot Vitreous(kore)\nCapitular(kore)\nGilbertian(katrinka)\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nforall x (Dismantled(x) -> not Flaunty(x))\nnot Dismantled(kore) -> Anglican(kore)\n\nVitreous(kore)\n\ntherefore not Vitreous(kore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Warden is not colonic. Warden is peccant. King is arteriolar. All peccant things are shitty. All shitty things are not overland. If Warden is not shitty then Warden is indulgent. Warden is shitty.", "logic": "\nnot Colonic(warden)\nPeccant(warden)\nArteriolar(king)\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Shitty(x))\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> not Overland(x))\nnot Shitty(warden) -> Indulgent(warden)\n\nShitty(warden)\n\nPeccant(warden) and forall x (Peccant(x) -> Shitty(x)) -> therefore Shitty(warden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Briana is not wheaten. Briana is plaguey. Solly is mercerized. All plaguey things are palmate. All palmate things are not evident. If Briana is not palmate then Briana is carboxyl. Briana is not palmate.", "logic": "\nnot Wheaten(briana)\nPlaguey(briana)\nMercerized(solly)\nforall x (Plaguey(x) -> Palmate(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) -> not Evident(x))\nnot Palmate(briana) -> Carboxyl(briana)\n\nnot Palmate(briana)\n\nPlaguey(briana) and forall x (Plaguey(x) -> Palmate(x)) -> therefore Palmate(briana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Derk is not numeric. Derk is precarious. Valentia is lurid. All precarious things are arresting. All arresting things are not reductive. If Derk is not arresting then Derk is armillary. Derk is not reductive.", "logic": "\nnot Numeric(derk)\nPrecarious(derk)\nLurid(valentia)\nforall x (Precarious(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Arresting(x) -> not Reductive(x))\nnot Arresting(derk) -> Armillary(derk)\n\nnot Reductive(derk)\n\nPrecarious(derk) and forall x (Precarious(x) -> Arresting(x)) -> therefore Arresting(derk) Arresting(derk) and forall x (Arresting(x) -> not Reductive(x)) -> therefore not Reductive(derk)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Katharina is not bauxitic. Katharina is flagitious. Enya is anaglyptic. All flagitious things are suntanned. All suntanned things are not familiar. If Katharina is not suntanned then Katharina is doughy. Katharina is familiar.", "logic": "\nnot Bauxitic(katharina)\nFlagitious(katharina)\nAnaglyptic(enya)\nforall x (Flagitious(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) -> not Familiar(x))\nnot Suntanned(katharina) -> Doughy(katharina)\n\nFamiliar(katharina)\n\nFlagitious(katharina) and forall x (Flagitious(x) -> Suntanned(x)) -> therefore Suntanned(katharina) Suntanned(katharina) and forall x (Suntanned(x) -> not Familiar(x)) -> therefore not Familiar(katharina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Florinda is not bullate. Florinda is unbolted. Nedda is tensile. All unbolted things are afrikaans. All afrikaans things are not anionic. If Florinda is not afrikaans then Florinda is potable. Nedda is not afrikaans.", "logic": "\nnot Bullate(florinda)\nUnbolted(florinda)\nTensile(nedda)\nforall x (Unbolted(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Afrikaans(x) -> not Anionic(x))\nnot Afrikaans(florinda) -> Potable(florinda)\n\nnot Afrikaans(nedda)\n\nforall x (Unbolted(x) -> Afrikaans(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Gustaf is not extraneous. Gustaf is indigent. Ellyn is lovesome. All indigent things are motile. All motile things are not fogbound. If Gustaf is not motile then Gustaf is needless. Gustaf is needless.", "logic": "\nnot Extraneous(gustaf)\nIndigent(gustaf)\nLovesome(ellyn)\nforall x (Indigent(x) -> Motile(x))\nforall x (Motile(x) -> not Fogbound(x))\nnot Motile(gustaf) -> Needless(gustaf)\n\nNeedless(gustaf)\n\nnot Motile(gustaf) -> Needless(gustaf) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Maryellen is not handheld. Maryellen is rickety. Lauryn is headless. All rickety things are painterly. All painterly things are not tiptop. If Maryellen is not painterly then Maryellen is ceaseless. Lauryn is not young.", "logic": "\nnot Handheld(maryellen)\nRickety(maryellen)\nHeadless(lauryn)\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Painterly(x) -> not Tiptop(x))\nnot Painterly(maryellen) -> Ceaseless(maryellen)\n\nnot Young(lauryn)\n\nnot Young(lauryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Perla is not ethereal. Perla is nonkosher. Obie is bedridden. All nonkosher things are popish. All popish things are not unsavoury. If Perla is not popish then Perla is sedate. Obie is nonkosher.", "logic": "\nnot Ethereal(perla)\nNonkosher(perla)\nBedridden(obie)\nforall x (Nonkosher(x) -> Popish(x))\nforall x (Popish(x) -> not Unsavoury(x))\nnot Popish(perla) -> Sedate(perla)\n\nNonkosher(obie)\n\nNonkosher(obie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Mora is not barefaced. Mora is autotypic. Beatrix is uniparous. All autotypic things are sulfurous. All sulfurous things are not crotchety. If Mora is not sulfurous then Mora is canned. Beatrix is not crotchety.", "logic": "\nnot Barefaced(mora)\nAutotypic(mora)\nUniparous(beatrix)\nforall x (Autotypic(x) -> Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> not Crotchety(x))\nnot Sulfurous(mora) -> Canned(mora)\n\nnot Crotchety(beatrix)\n\nnot Crotchety(beatrix) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "Alfredo is not noteworthy. Alfredo is courageous. Suzan is exoergic. All courageous things are artistic. All artistic things are not tinkly. If Alfredo is not artistic then Alfredo is dissected. Alfredo is exoergic.", "logic": "\nnot Noteworthy(alfredo)\nCourageous(alfredo)\nExoergic(suzan)\nforall x (Courageous(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Artistic(x) -> not Tinkly(x))\nnot Artistic(alfredo) -> Dissected(alfredo)\n\nExoergic(alfredo)\n\nExoergic(alfredo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The milzie does not chase the dyan. The milzie does not chase the kayla. The milzie pervert the dyan. The milzie pervert the kayla. The milzie is tibetan. The milzie is unpierced. The milzie lapidify the dyan. The dyan agenize the milzie. The dyan is tibetan. The kayla agenize the milzie. The kayla is unbrushed. The kayla is not unpierced. The kayla is threadbare. The kayla is late. The kayla does not need the milzie. If something agenize the dyan and it is not unbrushed then it lapidify the milzie. If something is unpierced and it does not chase the dyan then the dyan pervert the milzie. If the dyan pervert the milzie and the milzie pervert the kayla then the kayla pervert the milzie. The dyan is tibetan.", "logic": "\nnot Agenize(milzie, dyan)\nnot Agenize(milzie, kayla)\nPervert(milzie, dyan)\nPervert(milzie, kayla)\nTibetan(milzie)\nUnpierced(milzie)\nLapidify(milzie, dyan)\nAgenize(dyan, milzie)\nTibetan(dyan)\nAgenize(kayla, milzie)\nUnbrushed(kayla)\nnot Unpierced(kayla)\nThreadbare(kayla)\nLate(kayla)\nnot Lapidify(kayla, milzie)\nforall x (Agenize(x, dyan) and not Unbrushed(x) -> Lapidify(x, milzie))\nforall x (Unpierced(x) and not Agenize(x, dyan) -> Pervert(dyan, milzie))\nPervert(dyan, milzie) and Pervert(milzie, kayla) -> Pervert(kayla, milzie)\n\nTibetan(dyan)\n\ntherefore Tibetan(dyan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The gonzalo does not chase the skipton. The gonzalo does not chase the moore. The gonzalo nick the skipton. The gonzalo nick the moore. The gonzalo is dissected. The gonzalo is phenomenal. The gonzalo monetise the skipton. The skipton hook the gonzalo. The skipton is dissected. The moore hook the gonzalo. The moore is bonkers. The moore is not phenomenal. The moore is stricken. The moore is artless. The moore does not need the gonzalo. If something hook the skipton and it is not bonkers then it monetise the gonzalo. If something is phenomenal and it does not chase the skipton then the skipton nick the gonzalo. If the skipton nick the gonzalo and the gonzalo nick the moore then the moore nick the gonzalo. The gonzalo is not dissected.", "logic": "\nnot Hook(gonzalo, skipton)\nnot Hook(gonzalo, moore)\nNick(gonzalo, skipton)\nNick(gonzalo, moore)\nDissected(gonzalo)\nPhenomenal(gonzalo)\nMonetise(gonzalo, skipton)\nHook(skipton, gonzalo)\nDissected(skipton)\nHook(moore, gonzalo)\nBonkers(moore)\nnot Phenomenal(moore)\nStricken(moore)\nArtless(moore)\nnot Monetise(moore, gonzalo)\nforall x (Hook(x, skipton) and not Bonkers(x) -> Monetise(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) and not Hook(x, skipton) -> Nick(skipton, gonzalo))\nNick(skipton, gonzalo) and Nick(gonzalo, moore) -> Nick(moore, gonzalo)\n\nnot Dissected(gonzalo)\n\ntherefore Dissected(gonzalo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The jameson does not chase the ursula. The jameson does not chase the odetta. The jameson balk the ursula. The jameson balk the odetta. The jameson is pinstriped. The jameson is parotid. The jameson guess the ursula. The ursula clop the jameson. The ursula is pinstriped. The odetta clop the jameson. The odetta is ataractic. The odetta is not parotid. The odetta is robotlike. The odetta is unlocked. The odetta does not need the jameson. If something clop the ursula and it is not ataractic then it guess the jameson. If something is parotid and it does not chase the ursula then the ursula balk the jameson. If the ursula balk the jameson and the jameson balk the odetta then the odetta balk the jameson. The ursula balk the jameson.", "logic": "\nnot Clop(jameson, ursula)\nnot Clop(jameson, odetta)\nBalk(jameson, ursula)\nBalk(jameson, odetta)\nPinstriped(jameson)\nParotid(jameson)\nGuess(jameson, ursula)\nClop(ursula, jameson)\nPinstriped(ursula)\nClop(odetta, jameson)\nAtaractic(odetta)\nnot Parotid(odetta)\nRobotlike(odetta)\nUnlocked(odetta)\nnot Guess(odetta, jameson)\nforall x (Clop(x, ursula) and not Ataractic(x) -> Guess(x, jameson))\nforall x (Parotid(x) and not Clop(x, ursula) -> Balk(ursula, jameson))\nBalk(ursula, jameson) and Balk(jameson, odetta) -> Balk(odetta, jameson)\n\nBalk(ursula, jameson)\n\nParotid(jameson) and not Clop(jameson, ursula) and forall x (Parotid(x) and not Clop(x, ursula) -> Balk(ursula, jameson)) -> therefore Balk(ursula, jameson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The rafaelita does not chase the benedict. The rafaelita does not chase the pollyanna. The rafaelita politicise the benedict. The rafaelita politicise the pollyanna. The rafaelita is degressive. The rafaelita is maximizing. The rafaelita unload the benedict. The benedict infuse the rafaelita. The benedict is degressive. The pollyanna infuse the rafaelita. The pollyanna is reconciled. The pollyanna is not maximizing. The pollyanna is tearless. The pollyanna is ersatz. The pollyanna does not need the rafaelita. If something infuse the benedict and it is not reconciled then it unload the rafaelita. If something is maximizing and it does not chase the benedict then the benedict politicise the rafaelita. If the benedict politicise the rafaelita and the rafaelita politicise the pollyanna then the pollyanna politicise the rafaelita. The benedict does not eat the rafaelita.", "logic": "\nnot Infuse(rafaelita, benedict)\nnot Infuse(rafaelita, pollyanna)\nPoliticise(rafaelita, benedict)\nPoliticise(rafaelita, pollyanna)\nDegressive(rafaelita)\nMaximizing(rafaelita)\nUnload(rafaelita, benedict)\nInfuse(benedict, rafaelita)\nDegressive(benedict)\nInfuse(pollyanna, rafaelita)\nReconciled(pollyanna)\nnot Maximizing(pollyanna)\nTearless(pollyanna)\nErsatz(pollyanna)\nnot Unload(pollyanna, rafaelita)\nforall x (Infuse(x, benedict) and not Reconciled(x) -> Unload(x, rafaelita))\nforall x (Maximizing(x) and not Infuse(x, benedict) -> Politicise(benedict, rafaelita))\nPoliticise(benedict, rafaelita) and Politicise(rafaelita, pollyanna) -> Politicise(pollyanna, rafaelita)\n\nnot Politicise(benedict, rafaelita)\n\nMaximizing(rafaelita) and not Infuse(rafaelita, benedict) and forall x (Maximizing(x) and not Infuse(x, benedict) -> Politicise(benedict, rafaelita)) -> therefore Politicise(benedict, rafaelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The nerte does not chase the josiah. The nerte does not chase the galen. The nerte grouch the josiah. The nerte grouch the galen. The nerte is honorary. The nerte is precocial. The nerte wrest the josiah. The josiah litigate the nerte. The josiah is honorary. The galen litigate the nerte. The galen is traveled. The galen is not precocial. The galen is muddy. The galen is computable. The galen does not need the nerte. If something litigate the josiah and it is not traveled then it wrest the nerte. If something is precocial and it does not chase the josiah then the josiah grouch the nerte. If the josiah grouch the nerte and the nerte grouch the galen then the galen grouch the nerte. The galen grouch the nerte.", "logic": "\nnot Litigate(nerte, josiah)\nnot Litigate(nerte, galen)\nGrouch(nerte, josiah)\nGrouch(nerte, galen)\nHonorary(nerte)\nPrecocial(nerte)\nWrest(nerte, josiah)\nLitigate(josiah, nerte)\nHonorary(josiah)\nLitigate(galen, nerte)\nTraveled(galen)\nnot Precocial(galen)\nMuddy(galen)\nComputable(galen)\nnot Wrest(galen, nerte)\nforall x (Litigate(x, josiah) and not Traveled(x) -> Wrest(x, nerte))\nforall x (Precocial(x) and not Litigate(x, josiah) -> Grouch(josiah, nerte))\nGrouch(josiah, nerte) and Grouch(nerte, galen) -> Grouch(galen, nerte)\n\nGrouch(galen, nerte)\n\nPrecocial(nerte) and not Litigate(nerte, josiah) and forall x (Precocial(x) and not Litigate(x, josiah) -> Grouch(josiah, nerte)) -> therefore Grouch(josiah, nerte) Grouch(josiah, nerte) and Grouch(nerte, galen) and Grouch(josiah, nerte) and Grouch(nerte, galen) -> Grouch(galen, nerte) -> therefore Grouch(galen, nerte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The yves does not chase the malorie. The yves does not chase the ema. The yves assonate the malorie. The yves assonate the ema. The yves is agitative. The yves is ulnar. The yves medicine the malorie. The malorie paginate the yves. The malorie is agitative. The ema paginate the yves. The ema is silicious. The ema is not ulnar. The ema is salvific. The ema is ultrasonic. The ema does not need the yves. If something paginate the malorie and it is not silicious then it medicine the yves. If something is ulnar and it does not chase the malorie then the malorie assonate the yves. If the malorie assonate the yves and the yves assonate the ema then the ema assonate the yves. The ema does not eat the yves.", "logic": "\nnot Paginate(yves, malorie)\nnot Paginate(yves, ema)\nAssonate(yves, malorie)\nAssonate(yves, ema)\nAgitative(yves)\nUlnar(yves)\nMedicine(yves, malorie)\nPaginate(malorie, yves)\nAgitative(malorie)\nPaginate(ema, yves)\nSilicious(ema)\nnot Ulnar(ema)\nSalvific(ema)\nUltrasonic(ema)\nnot Medicine(ema, yves)\nforall x (Paginate(x, malorie) and not Silicious(x) -> Medicine(x, yves))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) and not Paginate(x, malorie) -> Assonate(malorie, yves))\nAssonate(malorie, yves) and Assonate(yves, ema) -> Assonate(ema, yves)\n\nnot Assonate(ema, yves)\n\nUlnar(yves) and not Paginate(yves, malorie) and forall x (Ulnar(x) and not Paginate(x, malorie) -> Assonate(malorie, yves)) -> therefore Assonate(malorie, yves) Assonate(malorie, yves) and Assonate(yves, ema) and Assonate(malorie, yves) and Assonate(yves, ema) -> Assonate(ema, yves) -> therefore Assonate(ema, yves)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The bryana does not chase the edith. The bryana does not chase the devondra. The bryana autograph the edith. The bryana autograph the devondra. The bryana is sandpapery. The bryana is inhibitory. The bryana crest the edith. The edith fixate the bryana. The edith is sandpapery. The devondra fixate the bryana. The devondra is yogic. The devondra is not inhibitory. The devondra is vocalic. The devondra is unsyllabic. The devondra does not need the bryana. If something fixate the edith and it is not yogic then it crest the bryana. If something is inhibitory and it does not chase the edith then the edith autograph the bryana. If the edith autograph the bryana and the bryana autograph the devondra then the devondra autograph the bryana. The edith does not need the bryana.", "logic": "\nnot Fixate(bryana, edith)\nnot Fixate(bryana, devondra)\nAutograph(bryana, edith)\nAutograph(bryana, devondra)\nSandpapery(bryana)\nInhibitory(bryana)\nCrest(bryana, edith)\nFixate(edith, bryana)\nSandpapery(edith)\nFixate(devondra, bryana)\nYogic(devondra)\nnot Inhibitory(devondra)\nVocalic(devondra)\nUnsyllabic(devondra)\nnot Crest(devondra, bryana)\nforall x (Fixate(x, edith) and not Yogic(x) -> Crest(x, bryana))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) and not Fixate(x, edith) -> Autograph(edith, bryana))\nAutograph(edith, bryana) and Autograph(bryana, devondra) -> Autograph(devondra, bryana)\n\nnot Crest(edith, bryana)\n\nforall x (Fixate(x, edith) and not Yogic(x) -> Crest(x, bryana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The linell does not chase the doll. The linell does not chase the karlee. The linell postpose the doll. The linell postpose the karlee. The linell is steroidal. The linell is nascent. The linell mothball the doll. The doll reship the linell. The doll is steroidal. The karlee reship the linell. The karlee is executed. The karlee is not nascent. The karlee is irreverent. The karlee is chronic. The karlee does not need the linell. If something reship the doll and it is not executed then it mothball the linell. If something is nascent and it does not chase the doll then the doll postpose the linell. If the doll postpose the linell and the linell postpose the karlee then the karlee postpose the linell. The linell mothball the linell.", "logic": "\nnot Reship(linell, doll)\nnot Reship(linell, karlee)\nPostpose(linell, doll)\nPostpose(linell, karlee)\nSteroidal(linell)\nNascent(linell)\nMothball(linell, doll)\nReship(doll, linell)\nSteroidal(doll)\nReship(karlee, linell)\nExecuted(karlee)\nnot Nascent(karlee)\nIrreverent(karlee)\nChronic(karlee)\nnot Mothball(karlee, linell)\nforall x (Reship(x, doll) and not Executed(x) -> Mothball(x, linell))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and not Reship(x, doll) -> Postpose(doll, linell))\nPostpose(doll, linell) and Postpose(linell, karlee) -> Postpose(karlee, linell)\n\nMothball(linell, linell)\n\nforall x (Reship(x, doll) and not Executed(x) -> Mothball(x, linell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The karina does not chase the gamaliel. The karina does not chase the kathlene. The karina wank the gamaliel. The karina wank the kathlene. The karina is woven. The karina is malicious. The karina unzip the gamaliel. The gamaliel forearm the karina. The gamaliel is woven. The kathlene forearm the karina. The kathlene is billowy. The kathlene is not malicious. The kathlene is alated. The kathlene is senescent. The kathlene does not need the karina. If something forearm the gamaliel and it is not billowy then it unzip the karina. If something is malicious and it does not chase the gamaliel then the gamaliel wank the karina. If the gamaliel wank the karina and the karina wank the kathlene then the kathlene wank the karina. The gamaliel does not need the gamaliel.", "logic": "\nnot Forearm(karina, gamaliel)\nnot Forearm(karina, kathlene)\nWank(karina, gamaliel)\nWank(karina, kathlene)\nWoven(karina)\nMalicious(karina)\nUnzip(karina, gamaliel)\nForearm(gamaliel, karina)\nWoven(gamaliel)\nForearm(kathlene, karina)\nBillowy(kathlene)\nnot Malicious(kathlene)\nAlated(kathlene)\nSenescent(kathlene)\nnot Unzip(kathlene, karina)\nforall x (Forearm(x, gamaliel) and not Billowy(x) -> Unzip(x, karina))\nforall x (Malicious(x) and not Forearm(x, gamaliel) -> Wank(gamaliel, karina))\nWank(gamaliel, karina) and Wank(karina, kathlene) -> Wank(kathlene, karina)\n\nnot Unzip(gamaliel, gamaliel)\n\nnot Unzip(gamaliel, gamaliel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The bridget does not chase the elwira. The bridget does not chase the kincaid. The bridget rehearse the elwira. The bridget rehearse the kincaid. The bridget is thwarting. The bridget is valorous. The bridget strike the elwira. The elwira topple the bridget. The elwira is thwarting. The kincaid topple the bridget. The kincaid is unnoticed. The kincaid is not valorous. The kincaid is formosan. The kincaid is carbuncled. The kincaid does not need the bridget. If something topple the elwira and it is not unnoticed then it strike the bridget. If something is valorous and it does not chase the elwira then the elwira rehearse the bridget. If the elwira rehearse the bridget and the bridget rehearse the kincaid then the kincaid rehearse the bridget. The bridget is carbuncled.", "logic": "\nnot Topple(bridget, elwira)\nnot Topple(bridget, kincaid)\nRehearse(bridget, elwira)\nRehearse(bridget, kincaid)\nThwarting(bridget)\nValorous(bridget)\nStrike(bridget, elwira)\nTopple(elwira, bridget)\nThwarting(elwira)\nTopple(kincaid, bridget)\nUnnoticed(kincaid)\nnot Valorous(kincaid)\nFormosan(kincaid)\nCarbuncled(kincaid)\nnot Strike(kincaid, bridget)\nforall x (Topple(x, elwira) and not Unnoticed(x) -> Strike(x, bridget))\nforall x (Valorous(x) and not Topple(x, elwira) -> Rehearse(elwira, bridget))\nRehearse(elwira, bridget) and Rehearse(bridget, kincaid) -> Rehearse(kincaid, bridget)\n\nCarbuncled(bridget)\n\nCarbuncled(bridget) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The ardelle does not chase the neil. The ardelle does not chase the viole. The ardelle plow the neil. The ardelle plow the viole. The ardelle is albinic. The ardelle is hurrying. The ardelle misspeak the neil. The neil plastinate the ardelle. The neil is albinic. The viole plastinate the ardelle. The viole is unlaureled. The viole is not hurrying. The viole is rigged. The viole is homostylic. The viole does not need the ardelle. If something plastinate the neil and it is not unlaureled then it misspeak the ardelle. If something is hurrying and it does not chase the neil then the neil plow the ardelle. If the neil plow the ardelle and the ardelle plow the viole then the viole plow the ardelle. The ardelle does not need the viole.", "logic": "\nnot Plastinate(ardelle, neil)\nnot Plastinate(ardelle, viole)\nPlow(ardelle, neil)\nPlow(ardelle, viole)\nAlbinic(ardelle)\nHurrying(ardelle)\nMisspeak(ardelle, neil)\nPlastinate(neil, ardelle)\nAlbinic(neil)\nPlastinate(viole, ardelle)\nUnlaureled(viole)\nnot Hurrying(viole)\nRigged(viole)\nHomostylic(viole)\nnot Misspeak(viole, ardelle)\nforall x (Plastinate(x, neil) and not Unlaureled(x) -> Misspeak(x, ardelle))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) and not Plastinate(x, neil) -> Plow(neil, ardelle))\nPlow(neil, ardelle) and Plow(ardelle, viole) -> Plow(viole, ardelle)\n\nnot Misspeak(ardelle, viole)\n\nnot Misspeak(ardelle, viole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "The almire does not chase the ulick. The almire does not chase the sybil. The almire caution the ulick. The almire caution the sybil. The almire is ruined. The almire is unpitying. The almire thrust the ulick. The ulick sinter the almire. The ulick is ruined. The sybil sinter the almire. The sybil is improper. The sybil is not unpitying. The sybil is ghastly. The sybil is arranged. The sybil does not need the almire. If something sinter the ulick and it is not improper then it thrust the almire. If something is unpitying and it does not chase the ulick then the ulick caution the almire. If the ulick caution the almire and the almire caution the sybil then the sybil caution the almire. The sybil sinter the ulick.", "logic": "\nnot Sinter(almire, ulick)\nnot Sinter(almire, sybil)\nCaution(almire, ulick)\nCaution(almire, sybil)\nRuined(almire)\nUnpitying(almire)\nThrust(almire, ulick)\nSinter(ulick, almire)\nRuined(ulick)\nSinter(sybil, almire)\nImproper(sybil)\nnot Unpitying(sybil)\nGhastly(sybil)\nArranged(sybil)\nnot Thrust(sybil, almire)\nforall x (Sinter(x, ulick) and not Improper(x) -> Thrust(x, almire))\nforall x (Unpitying(x) and not Sinter(x, ulick) -> Caution(ulick, almire))\nCaution(ulick, almire) and Caution(almire, sybil) -> Caution(sybil, almire)\n\nSinter(sybil, ulick)\n\nSinter(sybil, ulick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-995"} {"premises": "Otes is not olfactive. Otes is not harmonical. Beatriz is olfactive. Beatriz is freewill. Beatriz is harmonical. Beatriz is barmy. Elianora is freewill. Elianora is not harmonised. Elianora is harmonical. Elianora is barmy. Furry things are caecal. All freewill, overweight things are caecal. If something is harmonised and overweight then it is not caecal. If something is caecal then it is freewill. If something is harmonised and not olfactive then it is harmonical. Big things are harmonical. If something is overweight then it is harmonical. Big, barmy things are harmonised. Elianora is barmy.", "logic": "\nnot Olfactive(otes)\nnot Harmonical(otes)\nOlfactive(beatriz)\nFreewill(beatriz)\nHarmonical(beatriz)\nBarmy(beatriz)\nFreewill(elianora)\nnot Harmonised(elianora)\nHarmonical(elianora)\nBarmy(elianora)\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Freewill(x) and Overweight(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Harmonised(x) and Overweight(x) -> not Caecal(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) -> Freewill(x))\nforall x (Harmonised(x) and not Olfactive(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Overweight(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) and Barmy(x) -> Harmonised(x))\n\nBarmy(elianora)\n\ntherefore Barmy(elianora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Sydel is not mantled. Sydel is not berried. Florian is mantled. Florian is offstage. Florian is berried. Florian is chylific. Carroll is offstage. Carroll is not increasing. Carroll is berried. Carroll is chylific. Furry things are respective. All offstage, jumbled things are respective. If something is increasing and jumbled then it is not respective. If something is respective then it is offstage. If something is increasing and not mantled then it is berried. Big things are berried. If something is jumbled then it is berried. Big, chylific things are increasing. Sydel is berried.", "logic": "\nnot Mantled(sydel)\nnot Berried(sydel)\nMantled(florian)\nOffstage(florian)\nBerried(florian)\nChylific(florian)\nOffstage(carroll)\nnot Increasing(carroll)\nBerried(carroll)\nChylific(carroll)\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Offstage(x) and Jumbled(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) and Jumbled(x) -> not Respective(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) and not Mantled(x) -> Berried(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Berried(x))\nforall x (Jumbled(x) -> Berried(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) and Chylific(x) -> Increasing(x))\n\nBerried(sydel)\n\ntherefore not Berried(sydel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Cissie is not carpal. Cissie is not headfirst. Euphemia is carpal. Euphemia is translunar. Euphemia is headfirst. Euphemia is undeserved. Anallese is translunar. Anallese is not stratified. Anallese is headfirst. Anallese is undeserved. Furry things are proustian. All translunar, appetising things are proustian. If something is stratified and appetising then it is not proustian. If something is proustian then it is translunar. If something is stratified and not carpal then it is headfirst. Big things are headfirst. If something is appetising then it is headfirst. Big, undeserved things are stratified. Euphemia is proustian.", "logic": "\nnot Carpal(cissie)\nnot Headfirst(cissie)\nCarpal(euphemia)\nTranslunar(euphemia)\nHeadfirst(euphemia)\nUndeserved(euphemia)\nTranslunar(anallese)\nnot Stratified(anallese)\nHeadfirst(anallese)\nUndeserved(anallese)\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Proustian(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) and Appetising(x) -> Proustian(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) and Appetising(x) -> not Proustian(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Translunar(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) and not Carpal(x) -> Headfirst(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Headfirst(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Headfirst(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) and Undeserved(x) -> Stratified(x))\n\nProustian(euphemia)\n\nCarpal(euphemia) and forall x (Carpal(x) -> Proustian(x)) -> therefore Proustian(euphemia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Roshelle is not labile. Roshelle is not absorbing. Sheffy is labile. Sheffy is broadnosed. Sheffy is absorbing. Sheffy is bigger. Cory is broadnosed. Cory is not inharmonic. Cory is absorbing. Cory is bigger. Furry things are lawless. All broadnosed, woolly things are lawless. If something is inharmonic and woolly then it is not lawless. If something is lawless then it is broadnosed. If something is inharmonic and not labile then it is absorbing. Big things are absorbing. If something is woolly then it is absorbing. Big, bigger things are inharmonic. Sheffy is not lawless.", "logic": "\nnot Labile(roshelle)\nnot Absorbing(roshelle)\nLabile(sheffy)\nBroadnosed(sheffy)\nAbsorbing(sheffy)\nBigger(sheffy)\nBroadnosed(cory)\nnot Inharmonic(cory)\nAbsorbing(cory)\nBigger(cory)\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Lawless(x))\nforall x (Broadnosed(x) and Woolly(x) -> Lawless(x))\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) and Woolly(x) -> not Lawless(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) and not Labile(x) -> Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) -> Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) and Bigger(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\n\nnot Lawless(sheffy)\n\nLabile(sheffy) and forall x (Labile(x) -> Lawless(x)) -> therefore Lawless(sheffy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Anselm is not drowsing. Anselm is not attic. Jeri is drowsing. Jeri is rubber. Jeri is attic. Jeri is wrong. Hayward is rubber. Hayward is not livelong. Hayward is attic. Hayward is wrong. Furry things are braw. All rubber, contrived things are braw. If something is livelong and contrived then it is not braw. If something is braw then it is rubber. If something is livelong and not drowsing then it is attic. Big things are attic. If something is contrived then it is attic. Big, wrong things are livelong. Jeri is livelong.", "logic": "\nnot Drowsing(anselm)\nnot Attic(anselm)\nDrowsing(jeri)\nRubber(jeri)\nAttic(jeri)\nWrong(jeri)\nRubber(hayward)\nnot Livelong(hayward)\nAttic(hayward)\nWrong(hayward)\nforall x (Drowsing(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Rubber(x) and Contrived(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and Contrived(x) -> not Braw(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) -> Rubber(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and not Drowsing(x) -> Attic(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) -> Attic(x))\nforall x (Contrived(x) -> Attic(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) and Wrong(x) -> Livelong(x))\n\nLivelong(jeri)\n\nDrowsing(jeri) and forall x (Drowsing(x) -> Braw(x)) -> therefore Braw(jeri) Braw(jeri) and Wrong(jeri) and forall x (Braw(x) and Wrong(x) -> Livelong(x)) -> therefore Livelong(jeri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Andreana is not molal. Andreana is not penumbral. Cob is molal. Cob is horizontal. Cob is penumbral. Cob is ethical. Delia is horizontal. Delia is not cambial. Delia is penumbral. Delia is ethical. Furry things are churchly. All horizontal, preventive things are churchly. If something is cambial and preventive then it is not churchly. If something is churchly then it is horizontal. If something is cambial and not molal then it is penumbral. Big things are penumbral. If something is preventive then it is penumbral. Big, ethical things are cambial. Cob is not cambial.", "logic": "\nnot Molal(andreana)\nnot Penumbral(andreana)\nMolal(cob)\nHorizontal(cob)\nPenumbral(cob)\nEthical(cob)\nHorizontal(delia)\nnot Cambial(delia)\nPenumbral(delia)\nEthical(delia)\nforall x (Molal(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Horizontal(x) and Preventive(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Preventive(x) -> not Churchly(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Horizontal(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) and not Molal(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) and Ethical(x) -> Cambial(x))\n\nnot Cambial(cob)\n\nMolal(cob) and forall x (Molal(x) -> Churchly(x)) -> therefore Churchly(cob) Churchly(cob) and Ethical(cob) and forall x (Churchly(x) and Ethical(x) -> Cambial(x)) -> therefore Cambial(cob)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Gleda is not radiant. Gleda is not epizootic. Wald is radiant. Wald is senecan. Wald is epizootic. Wald is sinhala. Sherill is senecan. Sherill is not curt. Sherill is epizootic. Sherill is sinhala. Furry things are winless. All senecan, yellowed things are winless. If something is curt and yellowed then it is not winless. If something is winless then it is senecan. If something is curt and not radiant then it is epizootic. Big things are epizootic. If something is yellowed then it is epizootic. Big, sinhala things are curt. Gleda is not curt.", "logic": "\nnot Radiant(gleda)\nnot Epizootic(gleda)\nRadiant(wald)\nSenecan(wald)\nEpizootic(wald)\nSinhala(wald)\nSenecan(sherill)\nnot Curt(sherill)\nEpizootic(sherill)\nSinhala(sherill)\nforall x (Radiant(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) and Yellowed(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Curt(x) and Yellowed(x) -> not Winless(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Curt(x) and not Radiant(x) -> Epizootic(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) -> Epizootic(x))\nforall x (Yellowed(x) -> Epizootic(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) and Sinhala(x) -> Curt(x))\n\nnot Curt(gleda)\n\nforall x (Winless(x) and Sinhala(x) -> Curt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Chrisy is not inharmonic. Chrisy is not criterial. Vite is inharmonic. Vite is polemical. Vite is criterial. Vite is humongous. Ashlen is polemical. Ashlen is not subocular. Ashlen is criterial. Ashlen is humongous. Furry things are racking. All polemical, trifid things are racking. If something is subocular and trifid then it is not racking. If something is racking then it is polemical. If something is subocular and not inharmonic then it is criterial. Big things are criterial. If something is trifid then it is criterial. Big, humongous things are subocular. Chrisy is racking.", "logic": "\nnot Inharmonic(chrisy)\nnot Criterial(chrisy)\nInharmonic(vite)\nPolemical(vite)\nCriterial(vite)\nHumongous(vite)\nPolemical(ashlen)\nnot Subocular(ashlen)\nCriterial(ashlen)\nHumongous(ashlen)\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Racking(x))\nforall x (Polemical(x) and Trifid(x) -> Racking(x))\nforall x (Subocular(x) and Trifid(x) -> not Racking(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Polemical(x))\nforall x (Subocular(x) and not Inharmonic(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Trifid(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) and Humongous(x) -> Subocular(x))\n\nRacking(chrisy)\n\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Racking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Ursula is not bruneian. Ursula is not evacuant. Engracia is bruneian. Engracia is dolourous. Engracia is evacuant. Engracia is bounden. Daisey is dolourous. Daisey is not pearly. Daisey is evacuant. Daisey is bounden. Furry things are billowing. All dolourous, scaled things are billowing. If something is pearly and scaled then it is not billowing. If something is billowing then it is dolourous. If something is pearly and not bruneian then it is evacuant. Big things are evacuant. If something is scaled then it is evacuant. Big, bounden things are pearly. Daisey is not billowing.", "logic": "\nnot Bruneian(ursula)\nnot Evacuant(ursula)\nBruneian(engracia)\nDolourous(engracia)\nEvacuant(engracia)\nBounden(engracia)\nDolourous(daisey)\nnot Pearly(daisey)\nEvacuant(daisey)\nBounden(daisey)\nforall x (Bruneian(x) -> Billowing(x))\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Scaled(x) -> Billowing(x))\nforall x (Pearly(x) and Scaled(x) -> not Billowing(x))\nforall x (Billowing(x) -> Dolourous(x))\nforall x (Pearly(x) and not Bruneian(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Billowing(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Scaled(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Billowing(x) and Bounden(x) -> Pearly(x))\n\nnot Billowing(daisey)\n\nforall x (Bruneian(x) -> Billowing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Tawsha is not cotyloid. Tawsha is not upcountry. Mayda is cotyloid. Mayda is unexploded. Mayda is upcountry. Mayda is flaunty. Ray is unexploded. Ray is not pedagogic. Ray is upcountry. Ray is flaunty. Furry things are inhumane. All unexploded, sobersided things are inhumane. If something is pedagogic and sobersided then it is not inhumane. If something is inhumane then it is unexploded. If something is pedagogic and not cotyloid then it is upcountry. Big things are upcountry. If something is sobersided then it is upcountry. Big, flaunty things are pedagogic. Tawsha is sobersided.", "logic": "\nnot Cotyloid(tawsha)\nnot Upcountry(tawsha)\nCotyloid(mayda)\nUnexploded(mayda)\nUpcountry(mayda)\nFlaunty(mayda)\nUnexploded(ray)\nnot Pedagogic(ray)\nUpcountry(ray)\nFlaunty(ray)\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Unexploded(x) and Sobersided(x) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) and Sobersided(x) -> not Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Unexploded(x))\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) and not Cotyloid(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Flaunty(x) -> Pedagogic(x))\n\nSobersided(tawsha)\n\nSobersided(tawsha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Lynett is not shodden. Lynett is not selected. Jandy is shodden. Jandy is lobed. Jandy is selected. Jandy is victimized. Anatola is lobed. Anatola is not impending. Anatola is selected. Anatola is victimized. Furry things are chartered. All lobed, thermoset things are chartered. If something is impending and thermoset then it is not chartered. If something is chartered then it is lobed. If something is impending and not shodden then it is selected. Big things are selected. If something is thermoset then it is selected. Big, victimized things are impending. Anatola is not shodden.", "logic": "\nnot Shodden(lynett)\nnot Selected(lynett)\nShodden(jandy)\nLobed(jandy)\nSelected(jandy)\nVictimized(jandy)\nLobed(anatola)\nnot Impending(anatola)\nSelected(anatola)\nVictimized(anatola)\nforall x (Shodden(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Lobed(x) and Thermoset(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Impending(x) and Thermoset(x) -> not Chartered(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Lobed(x))\nforall x (Impending(x) and not Shodden(x) -> Selected(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Selected(x))\nforall x (Thermoset(x) -> Selected(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) and Victimized(x) -> Impending(x))\n\nnot Shodden(anatola)\n\nnot Shodden(anatola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Freddi is not semisoft. Freddi is not avestan. Hartley is semisoft. Hartley is romance. Hartley is avestan. Hartley is southerly. Josephine is romance. Josephine is not nilpotent. Josephine is avestan. Josephine is southerly. Furry things are lexical. All romance, exorbitant things are lexical. If something is nilpotent and exorbitant then it is not lexical. If something is lexical then it is romance. If something is nilpotent and not semisoft then it is avestan. Big things are avestan. If something is exorbitant then it is avestan. Big, southerly things are nilpotent. Freddi is southerly.", "logic": "\nnot Semisoft(freddi)\nnot Avestan(freddi)\nSemisoft(hartley)\nRomance(hartley)\nAvestan(hartley)\nSoutherly(hartley)\nRomance(josephine)\nnot Nilpotent(josephine)\nAvestan(josephine)\nSoutherly(josephine)\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Lexical(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) and Exorbitant(x) -> Lexical(x))\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) and Exorbitant(x) -> not Lexical(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) and not Semisoft(x) -> Avestan(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) -> Avestan(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Avestan(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) and Southerly(x) -> Nilpotent(x))\n\nSoutherly(freddi)\n\nSoutherly(freddi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-214"} {"premises": "Madlin is unipolar. Madlin is apocryphal. Madlin is bareback. Tedi is bacteremic. Tedi is tokenish. Tedi is apocryphal. Tedi is troubled. Nikki is bacteremic. Nikki is not tokenish. Nikki is apocryphal. Nikki is not troubled. Nikki is bareback. Maxi is unipolar. Maxi is not tokenish. Maxi is bareback. Maxi is fueled. If Tedi is fueled then Tedi is troubled. If something is bacteremic then it is bareback. All troubled things are bareback. All troubled, bareback things are unipolar. If Nikki is fueled and Nikki is not tokenish then Nikki is not apocryphal. If Tedi is unipolar then Tedi is tokenish. Maxi is unipolar.", "logic": "\nUnipolar(madlin)\nApocryphal(madlin)\nBareback(madlin)\nBacteremic(tedi)\nTokenish(tedi)\nApocryphal(tedi)\nTroubled(tedi)\nBacteremic(nikki)\nnot Tokenish(nikki)\nApocryphal(nikki)\nnot Troubled(nikki)\nBareback(nikki)\nUnipolar(maxi)\nnot Tokenish(maxi)\nBareback(maxi)\nFueled(maxi)\nFueled(tedi) -> Troubled(tedi)\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) -> Bareback(x))\nforall x (Troubled(x) -> Bareback(x))\nforall x (Troubled(x) and Bareback(x) -> Unipolar(x))\nFueled(nikki) and not Tokenish(nikki) -> not Apocryphal(nikki)\nUnipolar(tedi) -> Tokenish(tedi)\n\nUnipolar(maxi)\n\ntherefore Unipolar(maxi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Vallie is amoristic. Vallie is stabilised. Vallie is clxv. Kenna is acoustic. Kenna is geodetic. Kenna is stabilised. Kenna is busybodied. Gordan is acoustic. Gordan is not geodetic. Gordan is stabilised. Gordan is not busybodied. Gordan is clxv. Callida is amoristic. Callida is not geodetic. Callida is clxv. Callida is chic. If Kenna is chic then Kenna is busybodied. If something is acoustic then it is clxv. All busybodied things are clxv. All busybodied, clxv things are amoristic. If Gordan is chic and Gordan is not geodetic then Gordan is not stabilised. If Kenna is amoristic then Kenna is geodetic. Vallie is not clxv.", "logic": "\nAmoristic(vallie)\nStabilised(vallie)\nClxv(vallie)\nAcoustic(kenna)\nGeodetic(kenna)\nStabilised(kenna)\nBusybodied(kenna)\nAcoustic(gordan)\nnot Geodetic(gordan)\nStabilised(gordan)\nnot Busybodied(gordan)\nClxv(gordan)\nAmoristic(callida)\nnot Geodetic(callida)\nClxv(callida)\nChic(callida)\nChic(kenna) -> Busybodied(kenna)\nforall x (Acoustic(x) -> Clxv(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) -> Clxv(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) and Clxv(x) -> Amoristic(x))\nChic(gordan) and not Geodetic(gordan) -> not Stabilised(gordan)\nAmoristic(kenna) -> Geodetic(kenna)\n\nnot Clxv(vallie)\n\ntherefore Clxv(vallie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Anatole is undulate. Anatole is clitoral. Anatole is earlier. Perla is orthodox. Perla is babelike. Perla is clitoral. Perla is passive. Demetria is orthodox. Demetria is not babelike. Demetria is clitoral. Demetria is not passive. Demetria is earlier. Agata is undulate. Agata is not babelike. Agata is earlier. Agata is shamanist. If Perla is shamanist then Perla is passive. If something is orthodox then it is earlier. All passive things are earlier. All passive, earlier things are undulate. If Demetria is shamanist and Demetria is not babelike then Demetria is not clitoral. If Perla is undulate then Perla is babelike. Perla is earlier.", "logic": "\nUndulate(anatole)\nClitoral(anatole)\nEarlier(anatole)\nOrthodox(perla)\nBabelike(perla)\nClitoral(perla)\nPassive(perla)\nOrthodox(demetria)\nnot Babelike(demetria)\nClitoral(demetria)\nnot Passive(demetria)\nEarlier(demetria)\nUndulate(agata)\nnot Babelike(agata)\nEarlier(agata)\nShamanist(agata)\nShamanist(perla) -> Passive(perla)\nforall x (Orthodox(x) -> Earlier(x))\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Earlier(x))\nforall x (Passive(x) and Earlier(x) -> Undulate(x))\nShamanist(demetria) and not Babelike(demetria) -> not Clitoral(demetria)\nUndulate(perla) -> Babelike(perla)\n\nEarlier(perla)\n\nOrthodox(perla) and forall x (Orthodox(x) -> Earlier(x)) -> therefore Earlier(perla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Suzette is isocyclic. Suzette is reticent. Suzette is diacritic. Clemence is another. Clemence is jumentous. Clemence is reticent. Clemence is amharic. Philbert is another. Philbert is not jumentous. Philbert is reticent. Philbert is not amharic. Philbert is diacritic. Liam is isocyclic. Liam is not jumentous. Liam is diacritic. Liam is diestrous. If Clemence is diestrous then Clemence is amharic. If something is another then it is diacritic. All amharic things are diacritic. All amharic, diacritic things are isocyclic. If Philbert is diestrous and Philbert is not jumentous then Philbert is not reticent. If Clemence is isocyclic then Clemence is jumentous. Clemence is not diacritic.", "logic": "\nIsocyclic(suzette)\nReticent(suzette)\nDiacritic(suzette)\nAnother(clemence)\nJumentous(clemence)\nReticent(clemence)\nAmharic(clemence)\nAnother(philbert)\nnot Jumentous(philbert)\nReticent(philbert)\nnot Amharic(philbert)\nDiacritic(philbert)\nIsocyclic(liam)\nnot Jumentous(liam)\nDiacritic(liam)\nDiestrous(liam)\nDiestrous(clemence) -> Amharic(clemence)\nforall x (Another(x) -> Diacritic(x))\nforall x (Amharic(x) -> Diacritic(x))\nforall x (Amharic(x) and Diacritic(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\nDiestrous(philbert) and not Jumentous(philbert) -> not Reticent(philbert)\nIsocyclic(clemence) -> Jumentous(clemence)\n\nnot Diacritic(clemence)\n\nAnother(clemence) and forall x (Another(x) -> Diacritic(x)) -> therefore Diacritic(clemence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Emmanuel is sericeous. Emmanuel is maniac. Emmanuel is following. Breanne is hurried. Breanne is uncured. Breanne is maniac. Breanne is brief. Francene is hurried. Francene is not uncured. Francene is maniac. Francene is not brief. Francene is following. Lavinia is sericeous. Lavinia is not uncured. Lavinia is following. Lavinia is rainy. If Breanne is rainy then Breanne is brief. If something is hurried then it is following. All brief things are following. All brief, following things are sericeous. If Francene is rainy and Francene is not uncured then Francene is not maniac. If Breanne is sericeous then Breanne is uncured. Breanne is sericeous.", "logic": "\nSericeous(emmanuel)\nManiac(emmanuel)\nFollowing(emmanuel)\nHurried(breanne)\nUncured(breanne)\nManiac(breanne)\nBrief(breanne)\nHurried(francene)\nnot Uncured(francene)\nManiac(francene)\nnot Brief(francene)\nFollowing(francene)\nSericeous(lavinia)\nnot Uncured(lavinia)\nFollowing(lavinia)\nRainy(lavinia)\nRainy(breanne) -> Brief(breanne)\nforall x (Hurried(x) -> Following(x))\nforall x (Brief(x) -> Following(x))\nforall x (Brief(x) and Following(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nRainy(francene) and not Uncured(francene) -> not Maniac(francene)\nSericeous(breanne) -> Uncured(breanne)\n\nSericeous(breanne)\n\nHurried(breanne) and forall x (Hurried(x) -> Following(x)) -> therefore Following(breanne) Brief(breanne) and Following(breanne) and forall x (Brief(x) and Following(x) -> Sericeous(x)) -> therefore Sericeous(breanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Heida is unripened. Heida is limber. Heida is anamorphic. Cally is twoscore. Cally is spartan. Cally is limber. Cally is wistful. Miran is twoscore. Miran is not spartan. Miran is limber. Miran is not wistful. Miran is anamorphic. Mendie is unripened. Mendie is not spartan. Mendie is anamorphic. Mendie is inside. If Cally is inside then Cally is wistful. If something is twoscore then it is anamorphic. All wistful things are anamorphic. All wistful, anamorphic things are unripened. If Miran is inside and Miran is not spartan then Miran is not limber. If Cally is unripened then Cally is spartan. Cally is not unripened.", "logic": "\nUnripened(heida)\nLimber(heida)\nAnamorphic(heida)\nTwoscore(cally)\nSpartan(cally)\nLimber(cally)\nWistful(cally)\nTwoscore(miran)\nnot Spartan(miran)\nLimber(miran)\nnot Wistful(miran)\nAnamorphic(miran)\nUnripened(mendie)\nnot Spartan(mendie)\nAnamorphic(mendie)\nInside(mendie)\nInside(cally) -> Wistful(cally)\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nforall x (Wistful(x) and Anamorphic(x) -> Unripened(x))\nInside(miran) and not Spartan(miran) -> not Limber(miran)\nUnripened(cally) -> Spartan(cally)\n\nnot Unripened(cally)\n\nTwoscore(cally) and forall x (Twoscore(x) -> Anamorphic(x)) -> therefore Anamorphic(cally) Wistful(cally) and Anamorphic(cally) and forall x (Wistful(x) and Anamorphic(x) -> Unripened(x)) -> therefore Unripened(cally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Stefan is serflike. Stefan is elliptical. Stefan is freelance. Allegra is erect. Allegra is cometic. Allegra is elliptical. Allegra is waiting. Anastasia is erect. Anastasia is not cometic. Anastasia is elliptical. Anastasia is not waiting. Anastasia is freelance. Clarie is serflike. Clarie is not cometic. Clarie is freelance. Clarie is empurpled. If Allegra is empurpled then Allegra is waiting. If something is erect then it is freelance. All waiting things are freelance. All waiting, freelance things are serflike. If Anastasia is empurpled and Anastasia is not cometic then Anastasia is not elliptical. If Allegra is serflike then Allegra is cometic. Anastasia is not serflike.", "logic": "\nSerflike(stefan)\nElliptical(stefan)\nFreelance(stefan)\nErect(allegra)\nCometic(allegra)\nElliptical(allegra)\nWaiting(allegra)\nErect(anastasia)\nnot Cometic(anastasia)\nElliptical(anastasia)\nnot Waiting(anastasia)\nFreelance(anastasia)\nSerflike(clarie)\nnot Cometic(clarie)\nFreelance(clarie)\nEmpurpled(clarie)\nEmpurpled(allegra) -> Waiting(allegra)\nforall x (Erect(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Waiting(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Waiting(x) and Freelance(x) -> Serflike(x))\nEmpurpled(anastasia) and not Cometic(anastasia) -> not Elliptical(anastasia)\nSerflike(allegra) -> Cometic(allegra)\n\nnot Serflike(anastasia)\n\nforall x (Waiting(x) and Freelance(x) -> Serflike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Charisse is apetalous. Charisse is financial. Charisse is sorrowing. Sharlene is measured. Sharlene is foodless. Sharlene is financial. Sharlene is encircling. Stavros is measured. Stavros is not foodless. Stavros is financial. Stavros is not encircling. Stavros is sorrowing. Nessi is apetalous. Nessi is not foodless. Nessi is sorrowing. Nessi is buttonlike. If Sharlene is buttonlike then Sharlene is encircling. If something is measured then it is sorrowing. All encircling things are sorrowing. All encircling, sorrowing things are apetalous. If Stavros is buttonlike and Stavros is not foodless then Stavros is not financial. If Sharlene is apetalous then Sharlene is foodless. Charisse is encircling.", "logic": "\nApetalous(charisse)\nFinancial(charisse)\nSorrowing(charisse)\nMeasured(sharlene)\nFoodless(sharlene)\nFinancial(sharlene)\nEncircling(sharlene)\nMeasured(stavros)\nnot Foodless(stavros)\nFinancial(stavros)\nnot Encircling(stavros)\nSorrowing(stavros)\nApetalous(nessi)\nnot Foodless(nessi)\nSorrowing(nessi)\nButtonlike(nessi)\nButtonlike(sharlene) -> Encircling(sharlene)\nforall x (Measured(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Sorrowing(x) -> Apetalous(x))\nButtonlike(stavros) and not Foodless(stavros) -> not Financial(stavros)\nApetalous(sharlene) -> Foodless(sharlene)\n\nEncircling(charisse)\n\nEncircling(charisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Thain is after. Thain is cuboidal. Thain is refreshing. Mikel is jointed. Mikel is nonwoody. Mikel is cuboidal. Mikel is uncropped. Arlen is jointed. Arlen is not nonwoody. Arlen is cuboidal. Arlen is not uncropped. Arlen is refreshing. Dalia is after. Dalia is not nonwoody. Dalia is refreshing. Dalia is conceptive. If Mikel is conceptive then Mikel is uncropped. If something is jointed then it is refreshing. All uncropped things are refreshing. All uncropped, refreshing things are after. If Arlen is conceptive and Arlen is not nonwoody then Arlen is not cuboidal. If Mikel is after then Mikel is nonwoody. Thain is not nonwoody.", "logic": "\nAfter(thain)\nCuboidal(thain)\nRefreshing(thain)\nJointed(mikel)\nNonwoody(mikel)\nCuboidal(mikel)\nUncropped(mikel)\nJointed(arlen)\nnot Nonwoody(arlen)\nCuboidal(arlen)\nnot Uncropped(arlen)\nRefreshing(arlen)\nAfter(dalia)\nnot Nonwoody(dalia)\nRefreshing(dalia)\nConceptive(dalia)\nConceptive(mikel) -> Uncropped(mikel)\nforall x (Jointed(x) -> Refreshing(x))\nforall x (Uncropped(x) -> Refreshing(x))\nforall x (Uncropped(x) and Refreshing(x) -> After(x))\nConceptive(arlen) and not Nonwoody(arlen) -> not Cuboidal(arlen)\nAfter(mikel) -> Nonwoody(mikel)\n\nnot Nonwoody(thain)\n\nnot Nonwoody(thain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Rosana is eudaemonic. Rosana is colour. Rosana is flexile. Elvina is disjoint. Elvina is heterodyne. Elvina is colour. Elvina is pubertal. Pauly is disjoint. Pauly is not heterodyne. Pauly is colour. Pauly is not pubertal. Pauly is flexile. Skippie is eudaemonic. Skippie is not heterodyne. Skippie is flexile. Skippie is frank. If Elvina is frank then Elvina is pubertal. If something is disjoint then it is flexile. All pubertal things are flexile. All pubertal, flexile things are eudaemonic. If Pauly is frank and Pauly is not heterodyne then Pauly is not colour. If Elvina is eudaemonic then Elvina is heterodyne. Skippie is disjoint.", "logic": "\nEudaemonic(rosana)\nColour(rosana)\nFlexile(rosana)\nDisjoint(elvina)\nHeterodyne(elvina)\nColour(elvina)\nPubertal(elvina)\nDisjoint(pauly)\nnot Heterodyne(pauly)\nColour(pauly)\nnot Pubertal(pauly)\nFlexile(pauly)\nEudaemonic(skippie)\nnot Heterodyne(skippie)\nFlexile(skippie)\nFrank(skippie)\nFrank(elvina) -> Pubertal(elvina)\nforall x (Disjoint(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Flexile(x) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nFrank(pauly) and not Heterodyne(pauly) -> not Colour(pauly)\nEudaemonic(elvina) -> Heterodyne(elvina)\n\nDisjoint(skippie)\n\nDisjoint(skippie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Avram is feminist. Avram is receptive. Avram is unbodied. Sharona is redeemed. Sharona is stable. Sharona is receptive. Sharona is remaining. Dyson is redeemed. Dyson is not stable. Dyson is receptive. Dyson is not remaining. Dyson is unbodied. Pembroke is feminist. Pembroke is not stable. Pembroke is unbodied. Pembroke is intoxicant. If Sharona is intoxicant then Sharona is remaining. If something is redeemed then it is unbodied. All remaining things are unbodied. All remaining, unbodied things are feminist. If Dyson is intoxicant and Dyson is not stable then Dyson is not receptive. If Sharona is feminist then Sharona is stable. Pembroke is not remaining.", "logic": "\nFeminist(avram)\nReceptive(avram)\nUnbodied(avram)\nRedeemed(sharona)\nStable(sharona)\nReceptive(sharona)\nRemaining(sharona)\nRedeemed(dyson)\nnot Stable(dyson)\nReceptive(dyson)\nnot Remaining(dyson)\nUnbodied(dyson)\nFeminist(pembroke)\nnot Stable(pembroke)\nUnbodied(pembroke)\nIntoxicant(pembroke)\nIntoxicant(sharona) -> Remaining(sharona)\nforall x (Redeemed(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Remaining(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Remaining(x) and Unbodied(x) -> Feminist(x))\nIntoxicant(dyson) and not Stable(dyson) -> not Receptive(dyson)\nFeminist(sharona) -> Stable(sharona)\n\nnot Remaining(pembroke)\n\nnot Remaining(pembroke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Gerald is lienal. Gerald is unpurified. Gerald is offhand. Rick is fixed. Rick is miscible. Rick is unpurified. Rick is branched. Nancy is fixed. Nancy is not miscible. Nancy is unpurified. Nancy is not branched. Nancy is offhand. Carley is lienal. Carley is not miscible. Carley is offhand. Carley is honey. If Rick is honey then Rick is branched. If something is fixed then it is offhand. All branched things are offhand. All branched, offhand things are lienal. If Nancy is honey and Nancy is not miscible then Nancy is not unpurified. If Rick is lienal then Rick is miscible. Gerald is fixed.", "logic": "\nLienal(gerald)\nUnpurified(gerald)\nOffhand(gerald)\nFixed(rick)\nMiscible(rick)\nUnpurified(rick)\nBranched(rick)\nFixed(nancy)\nnot Miscible(nancy)\nUnpurified(nancy)\nnot Branched(nancy)\nOffhand(nancy)\nLienal(carley)\nnot Miscible(carley)\nOffhand(carley)\nHoney(carley)\nHoney(rick) -> Branched(rick)\nforall x (Fixed(x) -> Offhand(x))\nforall x (Branched(x) -> Offhand(x))\nforall x (Branched(x) and Offhand(x) -> Lienal(x))\nHoney(nancy) and not Miscible(nancy) -> not Unpurified(nancy)\nLienal(rick) -> Miscible(rick)\n\nFixed(gerald)\n\nFixed(gerald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1868"} {"premises": "Rahul is patronymic. Muffin is patronymic. Othella is not juiceless. Thane is braced. All wrong people are braced. Big people are bivalved. If Othella is irish then Othella is braced. Blue people are patronymic. All juiceless people are patronymic. If someone is patronymic then they are not packaged. If Othella is not irish and Othella is not bivalved then Othella is patronymic. If Muffin is irish and Muffin is not braced then Muffin is bivalved. Thane is braced.", "logic": "\nPatronymic(rahul)\nPatronymic(muffin)\nnot Juiceless(othella)\nBraced(thane)\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Braced(x))\nforall x (Irish(x) -> Bivalved(x))\nIrish(othella) -> Braced(othella)\nforall x (Braced(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Juiceless(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Patronymic(x) -> not Packaged(x))\nnot Irish(othella) and not Bivalved(othella) -> Patronymic(othella)\nIrish(muffin) and not Braced(muffin) -> Bivalved(muffin)\n\nBraced(thane)\n\ntherefore Braced(thane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Jackson is niffy. Rabi is niffy. Cathryn is not nicaraguan. Vania is poorly. All potent people are poorly. Big people are attested. If Cathryn is garbled then Cathryn is poorly. Blue people are niffy. All nicaraguan people are niffy. If someone is niffy then they are not advisable. If Cathryn is not garbled and Cathryn is not attested then Cathryn is niffy. If Rabi is garbled and Rabi is not poorly then Rabi is attested. Cathryn is nicaraguan.", "logic": "\nNiffy(jackson)\nNiffy(rabi)\nnot Nicaraguan(cathryn)\nPoorly(vania)\nforall x (Potent(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Garbled(x) -> Attested(x))\nGarbled(cathryn) -> Poorly(cathryn)\nforall x (Poorly(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> not Advisable(x))\nnot Garbled(cathryn) and not Attested(cathryn) -> Niffy(cathryn)\nGarbled(rabi) and not Poorly(rabi) -> Attested(rabi)\n\nNicaraguan(cathryn)\n\ntherefore not Nicaraguan(cathryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Kaiser is seljuk. Warden is seljuk. Goldy is not cupric. Sioux is empathic. All unactable people are empathic. Big people are undaunted. If Goldy is extrusive then Goldy is empathic. Blue people are seljuk. All cupric people are seljuk. If someone is seljuk then they are not cuspidated. If Goldy is not extrusive and Goldy is not undaunted then Goldy is seljuk. If Warden is extrusive and Warden is not empathic then Warden is undaunted. Kaiser is not cuspidated.", "logic": "\nSeljuk(kaiser)\nSeljuk(warden)\nnot Cupric(goldy)\nEmpathic(sioux)\nforall x (Unactable(x) -> Empathic(x))\nforall x (Extrusive(x) -> Undaunted(x))\nExtrusive(goldy) -> Empathic(goldy)\nforall x (Empathic(x) -> Seljuk(x))\nforall x (Cupric(x) -> Seljuk(x))\nforall x (Seljuk(x) -> not Cuspidated(x))\nnot Extrusive(goldy) and not Undaunted(goldy) -> Seljuk(goldy)\nExtrusive(warden) and not Empathic(warden) -> Undaunted(warden)\n\nnot Cuspidated(kaiser)\n\nSeljuk(kaiser) and forall x (Seljuk(x) -> not Cuspidated(x)) -> therefore not Cuspidated(kaiser)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Pierson is ringleted. Shelba is ringleted. Olly is not cytolytic. Alta is phosphoric. All salutary people are phosphoric. Big people are metabolous. If Olly is rightish then Olly is phosphoric. Blue people are ringleted. All cytolytic people are ringleted. If someone is ringleted then they are not xxxvii. If Olly is not rightish and Olly is not metabolous then Olly is ringleted. If Shelba is rightish and Shelba is not phosphoric then Shelba is metabolous. Shelba is xxxvii.", "logic": "\nRingleted(pierson)\nRingleted(shelba)\nnot Cytolytic(olly)\nPhosphoric(alta)\nforall x (Salutary(x) -> Phosphoric(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Metabolous(x))\nRightish(olly) -> Phosphoric(olly)\nforall x (Phosphoric(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) -> not Xxxvii(x))\nnot Rightish(olly) and not Metabolous(olly) -> Ringleted(olly)\nRightish(shelba) and not Phosphoric(shelba) -> Metabolous(shelba)\n\nXxxvii(shelba)\n\nRingleted(shelba) and forall x (Ringleted(x) -> not Xxxvii(x)) -> therefore not Xxxvii(shelba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Ilse is mistakable. Veronique is mistakable. Lenora is not smelly. Florence is unwanted. All epizoic people are unwanted. Big people are needless. If Lenora is arrayed then Lenora is unwanted. Blue people are mistakable. All smelly people are mistakable. If someone is mistakable then they are not fifty. If Lenora is not arrayed and Lenora is not needless then Lenora is mistakable. If Veronique is arrayed and Veronique is not unwanted then Veronique is needless. Florence is not fifty.", "logic": "\nMistakable(ilse)\nMistakable(veronique)\nnot Smelly(lenora)\nUnwanted(florence)\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Unwanted(x))\nforall x (Arrayed(x) -> Needless(x))\nArrayed(lenora) -> Unwanted(lenora)\nforall x (Unwanted(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) -> not Fifty(x))\nnot Arrayed(lenora) and not Needless(lenora) -> Mistakable(lenora)\nArrayed(veronique) and not Unwanted(veronique) -> Needless(veronique)\n\nnot Fifty(florence)\n\nUnwanted(florence) and forall x (Unwanted(x) -> Mistakable(x)) -> therefore Mistakable(florence) Mistakable(florence) and forall x (Mistakable(x) -> not Fifty(x)) -> therefore not Fifty(florence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Ellis is carinal. Gasper is carinal. Baily is not supported. Ranice is joyful. All ribless people are joyful. Big people are reclaimed. If Baily is dextral then Baily is joyful. Blue people are carinal. All supported people are carinal. If someone is carinal then they are not twiglike. If Baily is not dextral and Baily is not reclaimed then Baily is carinal. If Gasper is dextral and Gasper is not joyful then Gasper is reclaimed. Ranice is twiglike.", "logic": "\nCarinal(ellis)\nCarinal(gasper)\nnot Supported(baily)\nJoyful(ranice)\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Joyful(x))\nforall x (Dextral(x) -> Reclaimed(x))\nDextral(baily) -> Joyful(baily)\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Carinal(x))\nforall x (Supported(x) -> Carinal(x))\nforall x (Carinal(x) -> not Twiglike(x))\nnot Dextral(baily) and not Reclaimed(baily) -> Carinal(baily)\nDextral(gasper) and not Joyful(gasper) -> Reclaimed(gasper)\n\nTwiglike(ranice)\n\nJoyful(ranice) and forall x (Joyful(x) -> Carinal(x)) -> therefore Carinal(ranice) Carinal(ranice) and forall x (Carinal(x) -> not Twiglike(x)) -> therefore not Twiglike(ranice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Blakelee is agreed. Adolphe is agreed. Osmund is not bullying. Rock is bedridden. All smuggled people are bedridden. Big people are untrimmed. If Osmund is amenable then Osmund is bedridden. Blue people are agreed. All bullying people are agreed. If someone is agreed then they are not errhine. If Osmund is not amenable and Osmund is not untrimmed then Osmund is agreed. If Adolphe is amenable and Adolphe is not bedridden then Adolphe is untrimmed. Osmund is not untrimmed.", "logic": "\nAgreed(blakelee)\nAgreed(adolphe)\nnot Bullying(osmund)\nBedridden(rock)\nforall x (Smuggled(x) -> Bedridden(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nAmenable(osmund) -> Bedridden(osmund)\nforall x (Bedridden(x) -> Agreed(x))\nforall x (Bullying(x) -> Agreed(x))\nforall x (Agreed(x) -> not Errhine(x))\nnot Amenable(osmund) and not Untrimmed(osmund) -> Agreed(osmund)\nAmenable(adolphe) and not Bedridden(adolphe) -> Untrimmed(adolphe)\n\nnot Untrimmed(osmund)\n\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Untrimmed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Uriel is outdoorsy. Margette is outdoorsy. Weider is not living. Pris is lienal. All cannular people are lienal. Big people are sevenfold. If Weider is haematal then Weider is lienal. Blue people are outdoorsy. All living people are outdoorsy. If someone is outdoorsy then they are not anasarcous. If Weider is not haematal and Weider is not sevenfold then Weider is outdoorsy. If Margette is haematal and Margette is not lienal then Margette is sevenfold. Uriel is sevenfold.", "logic": "\nOutdoorsy(uriel)\nOutdoorsy(margette)\nnot Living(weider)\nLienal(pris)\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Haematal(x) -> Sevenfold(x))\nHaematal(weider) -> Lienal(weider)\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Living(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) -> not Anasarcous(x))\nnot Haematal(weider) and not Sevenfold(weider) -> Outdoorsy(weider)\nHaematal(margette) and not Lienal(margette) -> Sevenfold(margette)\n\nSevenfold(uriel)\n\nforall x (Haematal(x) -> Sevenfold(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Horace is unstable. Kalli is unstable. Giorgia is not stooping. Loria is duncish. All actinic people are duncish. Big people are piteous. If Giorgia is catchy then Giorgia is duncish. Blue people are unstable. All stooping people are unstable. If someone is unstable then they are not subacid. If Giorgia is not catchy and Giorgia is not piteous then Giorgia is unstable. If Kalli is catchy and Kalli is not duncish then Kalli is piteous. Loria is not piteous.", "logic": "\nUnstable(horace)\nUnstable(kalli)\nnot Stooping(giorgia)\nDuncish(loria)\nforall x (Actinic(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Piteous(x))\nCatchy(giorgia) -> Duncish(giorgia)\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Stooping(x) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Unstable(x) -> not Subacid(x))\nnot Catchy(giorgia) and not Piteous(giorgia) -> Unstable(giorgia)\nCatchy(kalli) and not Duncish(kalli) -> Piteous(kalli)\n\nnot Piteous(loria)\n\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Piteous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Morlee is vague. Laurent is vague. Silvano is not grapey. Rabbi is deboned. All benevolent people are deboned. Big people are roofed. If Silvano is flimsy then Silvano is deboned. Blue people are vague. All grapey people are vague. If someone is vague then they are not lacerate. If Silvano is not flimsy and Silvano is not roofed then Silvano is vague. If Laurent is flimsy and Laurent is not deboned then Laurent is roofed. Morlee is flimsy.", "logic": "\nVague(morlee)\nVague(laurent)\nnot Grapey(silvano)\nDeboned(rabbi)\nforall x (Benevolent(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Flimsy(x) -> Roofed(x))\nFlimsy(silvano) -> Deboned(silvano)\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Grapey(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) -> not Lacerate(x))\nnot Flimsy(silvano) and not Roofed(silvano) -> Vague(silvano)\nFlimsy(laurent) and not Deboned(laurent) -> Roofed(laurent)\n\nFlimsy(morlee)\n\nFlimsy(morlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Clare is epiphytic. Yves is epiphytic. Antonius is not arthritic. Sanderson is spooky. All fallen people are spooky. Big people are stoned. If Antonius is bearing then Antonius is spooky. Blue people are epiphytic. All arthritic people are epiphytic. If someone is epiphytic then they are not snowbound. If Antonius is not bearing and Antonius is not stoned then Antonius is epiphytic. If Yves is bearing and Yves is not spooky then Yves is stoned. Sanderson is not fallen.", "logic": "\nEpiphytic(clare)\nEpiphytic(yves)\nnot Arthritic(antonius)\nSpooky(sanderson)\nforall x (Fallen(x) -> Spooky(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Stoned(x))\nBearing(antonius) -> Spooky(antonius)\nforall x (Spooky(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) -> not Snowbound(x))\nnot Bearing(antonius) and not Stoned(antonius) -> Epiphytic(antonius)\nBearing(yves) and not Spooky(yves) -> Stoned(yves)\n\nnot Fallen(sanderson)\n\nnot Fallen(sanderson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Giordano is arbitral. Phyllys is arbitral. Benita is not whacking. Bernice is apopemptic. All grownup people are apopemptic. Big people are intestinal. If Benita is partible then Benita is apopemptic. Blue people are arbitral. All whacking people are arbitral. If someone is arbitral then they are not centralist. If Benita is not partible and Benita is not intestinal then Benita is arbitral. If Phyllys is partible and Phyllys is not apopemptic then Phyllys is intestinal. Phyllys is grownup.", "logic": "\nArbitral(giordano)\nArbitral(phyllys)\nnot Whacking(benita)\nApopemptic(bernice)\nforall x (Grownup(x) -> Apopemptic(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) -> Intestinal(x))\nPartible(benita) -> Apopemptic(benita)\nforall x (Apopemptic(x) -> Arbitral(x))\nforall x (Whacking(x) -> Arbitral(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) -> not Centralist(x))\nnot Partible(benita) and not Intestinal(benita) -> Arbitral(benita)\nPartible(phyllys) and not Apopemptic(phyllys) -> Intestinal(phyllys)\n\nGrownup(phyllys)\n\nGrownup(phyllys) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Coretta is unmannered. Truman is bilateral. Tomlin is unmannered. Jasmine is perfoliate. If Coretta is intended then Coretta is outrageous. If someone is unmannered then they are intended. If Jasmine is unmannered then Jasmine is withering. Coretta is unmannered.", "logic": "\nUnmannered(coretta)\nBilateral(truman)\nUnmannered(tomlin)\nPerfoliate(jasmine)\nIntended(coretta) -> Outrageous(coretta)\nforall x (Unmannered(x) -> Intended(x))\nUnmannered(jasmine) -> Withering(jasmine)\n\nUnmannered(coretta)\n\ntherefore Unmannered(coretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Alberta is congruent. Joanie is silken. Kirbee is congruent. Baillie is mangy. If Alberta is hagridden then Alberta is ossified. If someone is congruent then they are hagridden. If Baillie is congruent then Baillie is communal. Kirbee is not congruent.", "logic": "\nCongruent(alberta)\nSilken(joanie)\nCongruent(kirbee)\nMangy(baillie)\nHagridden(alberta) -> Ossified(alberta)\nforall x (Congruent(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nCongruent(baillie) -> Communal(baillie)\n\nnot Congruent(kirbee)\n\ntherefore Congruent(kirbee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Steffane is mortal. Ely is incorrupt. Pietro is mortal. Kipp is modeled. If Steffane is ramose then Steffane is british. If someone is mortal then they are ramose. If Kipp is mortal then Kipp is movable. Steffane is ramose.", "logic": "\nMortal(steffane)\nIncorrupt(ely)\nMortal(pietro)\nModeled(kipp)\nRamose(steffane) -> British(steffane)\nforall x (Mortal(x) -> Ramose(x))\nMortal(kipp) -> Movable(kipp)\n\nRamose(steffane)\n\nMortal(steffane) and forall x (Mortal(x) -> Ramose(x)) -> therefore Ramose(steffane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Averyl is sugary. Tally is jade. Stevy is sugary. Damien is lasting. If Averyl is siliceous then Averyl is azoic. If someone is sugary then they are siliceous. If Damien is sugary then Damien is amicable. Averyl is not siliceous.", "logic": "\nSugary(averyl)\nJade(tally)\nSugary(stevy)\nLasting(damien)\nSiliceous(averyl) -> Azoic(averyl)\nforall x (Sugary(x) -> Siliceous(x))\nSugary(damien) -> Amicable(damien)\n\nnot Siliceous(averyl)\n\nSugary(averyl) and forall x (Sugary(x) -> Siliceous(x)) -> therefore Siliceous(averyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Masha is vermiform. Heddie is light. Terrel is vermiform. Wallache is shamed. If Masha is beakless then Masha is cervical. If someone is vermiform then they are beakless. If Wallache is vermiform then Wallache is belated. Masha is cervical.", "logic": "\nVermiform(masha)\nLight(heddie)\nVermiform(terrel)\nShamed(wallache)\nBeakless(masha) -> Cervical(masha)\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Beakless(x))\nVermiform(wallache) -> Belated(wallache)\n\nCervical(masha)\n\nVermiform(masha) and forall x (Vermiform(x) -> Beakless(x)) -> therefore Beakless(masha) Beakless(masha) and Beakless(masha) -> Cervical(masha) -> therefore Cervical(masha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Janean is unaired. Cleveland is nonbearing. Lynea is unaired. Mirilla is didactic. If Janean is headlong then Janean is drugless. If someone is unaired then they are headlong. If Mirilla is unaired then Mirilla is darned. Janean is not drugless.", "logic": "\nUnaired(janean)\nNonbearing(cleveland)\nUnaired(lynea)\nDidactic(mirilla)\nHeadlong(janean) -> Drugless(janean)\nforall x (Unaired(x) -> Headlong(x))\nUnaired(mirilla) -> Darned(mirilla)\n\nnot Drugless(janean)\n\nUnaired(janean) and forall x (Unaired(x) -> Headlong(x)) -> therefore Headlong(janean) Headlong(janean) and Headlong(janean) -> Drugless(janean) -> therefore Drugless(janean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Sandor is uremic. Lusa is carsick. Glenda is uremic. Giorgi is dyspneal. If Sandor is ascitic then Sandor is goateed. If someone is uremic then they are ascitic. If Giorgi is uremic then Giorgi is aquatic. Giorgi is not ascitic.", "logic": "\nUremic(sandor)\nCarsick(lusa)\nUremic(glenda)\nDyspneal(giorgi)\nAscitic(sandor) -> Goateed(sandor)\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Ascitic(x))\nUremic(giorgi) -> Aquatic(giorgi)\n\nnot Ascitic(giorgi)\n\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Ascitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Rycca is tsarist. Gerhardt is benign. Muffin is tsarist. Shell is stabilised. If Rycca is wanton then Rycca is bandy. If someone is tsarist then they are wanton. If Shell is tsarist then Shell is nonaligned. Gerhardt is wanton.", "logic": "\nTsarist(rycca)\nBenign(gerhardt)\nTsarist(muffin)\nStabilised(shell)\nWanton(rycca) -> Bandy(rycca)\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Wanton(x))\nTsarist(shell) -> Nonaligned(shell)\n\nWanton(gerhardt)\n\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Wanton(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Robin is classic. Johnna is unscripted. Rena is classic. Marleen is rumbling. If Robin is unsalted then Robin is frowsy. If someone is classic then they are unsalted. If Marleen is classic then Marleen is unheeded. Marleen is not unheeded.", "logic": "\nClassic(robin)\nUnscripted(johnna)\nClassic(rena)\nRumbling(marleen)\nUnsalted(robin) -> Frowsy(robin)\nforall x (Classic(x) -> Unsalted(x))\nClassic(marleen) -> Unheeded(marleen)\n\nnot Unheeded(marleen)\n\nClassic(marleen) -> Unheeded(marleen) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Hellene is ruandan. Raquel is mandibular. Garrett is ruandan. Lian is lush. If Hellene is appetent then Hellene is absorbed. If someone is ruandan then they are appetent. If Lian is ruandan then Lian is dolourous. Hellene is dolourous.", "logic": "\nRuandan(hellene)\nMandibular(raquel)\nRuandan(garrett)\nLush(lian)\nAppetent(hellene) -> Absorbed(hellene)\nforall x (Ruandan(x) -> Appetent(x))\nRuandan(lian) -> Dolourous(lian)\n\nDolourous(hellene)\n\nDolourous(hellene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Elise is formative. Hedda is xlii. Manya is formative. Milena is pretorian. If Elise is spousal then Elise is lxxxiv. If someone is formative then they are spousal. If Milena is formative then Milena is sibyllic. Hedda is not lxxxiv.", "logic": "\nFormative(elise)\nXlii(hedda)\nFormative(manya)\nPretorian(milena)\nSpousal(elise) -> Lxxxiv(elise)\nforall x (Formative(x) -> Spousal(x))\nFormative(milena) -> Sibyllic(milena)\n\nnot Lxxxiv(hedda)\n\nnot Lxxxiv(hedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Rafaela is riveting. Sissie is softish. Myron is riveting. Johnathon is maggoty. If Rafaela is bodyless then Rafaela is boreal. If someone is riveting then they are bodyless. If Johnathon is riveting then Johnathon is awestruck. Myron is softish.", "logic": "\nRiveting(rafaela)\nSoftish(sissie)\nRiveting(myron)\nMaggoty(johnathon)\nBodyless(rafaela) -> Boreal(rafaela)\nforall x (Riveting(x) -> Bodyless(x))\nRiveting(johnathon) -> Awestruck(johnathon)\n\nSoftish(myron)\n\nSoftish(myron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "The feliza bustle the dyanna. The feliza churn the dyanna. The feliza basify the gwendolin. The gwendolin does not visit the dyanna. The dyanna bustle the feliza. The dyanna bustle the gwendolin. The dyanna basify the gwendolin. If the dyanna is orphic and the gwendolin does not visit the dyanna then the gwendolin churn the feliza. If something is drafty then it bustle the feliza. If something bustle the feliza then it is drafty. If something basify the feliza and the feliza is orphic then it churn the dyanna. If something bustle the dyanna then the dyanna basify the feliza. If something basify the dyanna and it is not inviting then it basify the gwendolin. If something is sapless then it basify the feliza. If something basify the gwendolin then it is orphic. The dyanna basify the gwendolin.", "logic": "\nBustle(feliza, dyanna)\nChurn(feliza, dyanna)\nBasify(feliza, gwendolin)\nnot Basify(gwendolin, dyanna)\nBustle(dyanna, feliza)\nBustle(dyanna, gwendolin)\nBasify(dyanna, gwendolin)\nOrphic(dyanna) and not Basify(gwendolin, dyanna) -> Churn(gwendolin, feliza)\nforall x (Drafty(x) -> Bustle(x, feliza))\nforall x (Bustle(x, feliza) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Basify(x, feliza) and Orphic(feliza) -> Churn(x, dyanna))\nforall x (Bustle(x, dyanna) -> Basify(dyanna, feliza))\nforall x (Basify(x, dyanna) and not Inviting(x) -> Basify(x, gwendolin))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Basify(x, feliza))\nforall x (Basify(x, gwendolin) -> Orphic(x))\n\nBasify(dyanna, gwendolin)\n\ntherefore Basify(dyanna, gwendolin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The paolo quaver the giff. The paolo consort the giff. The paolo drowse the teodor. The teodor does not visit the giff. The giff quaver the paolo. The giff quaver the teodor. The giff drowse the teodor. If the giff is insouciant and the teodor does not visit the giff then the teodor consort the paolo. If something is unsaleable then it quaver the paolo. If something quaver the paolo then it is unsaleable. If something drowse the paolo and the paolo is insouciant then it consort the giff. If something quaver the giff then the giff drowse the paolo. If something drowse the giff and it is not astrocytic then it drowse the teodor. If something is mulish then it drowse the paolo. If something drowse the teodor then it is insouciant. The paolo does not see the giff.", "logic": "\nQuaver(paolo, giff)\nConsort(paolo, giff)\nDrowse(paolo, teodor)\nnot Drowse(teodor, giff)\nQuaver(giff, paolo)\nQuaver(giff, teodor)\nDrowse(giff, teodor)\nInsouciant(giff) and not Drowse(teodor, giff) -> Consort(teodor, paolo)\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Quaver(x, paolo))\nforall x (Quaver(x, paolo) -> Unsaleable(x))\nforall x (Drowse(x, paolo) and Insouciant(paolo) -> Consort(x, giff))\nforall x (Quaver(x, giff) -> Drowse(giff, paolo))\nforall x (Drowse(x, giff) and not Astrocytic(x) -> Drowse(x, teodor))\nforall x (Mulish(x) -> Drowse(x, paolo))\nforall x (Drowse(x, teodor) -> Insouciant(x))\n\nnot Consort(paolo, giff)\n\ntherefore Consort(paolo, giff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The becka overfeed the korry. The becka leech the korry. The becka sell the allene. The allene does not visit the korry. The korry overfeed the becka. The korry overfeed the allene. The korry sell the allene. If the korry is outclassed and the allene does not visit the korry then the allene leech the becka. If something is recoilless then it overfeed the becka. If something overfeed the becka then it is recoilless. If something sell the becka and the becka is outclassed then it leech the korry. If something overfeed the korry then the korry sell the becka. If something sell the korry and it is not zaftig then it sell the allene. If something is parttime then it sell the becka. If something sell the allene then it is outclassed. The korry is recoilless.", "logic": "\nOverfeed(becka, korry)\nLeech(becka, korry)\nSell(becka, allene)\nnot Sell(allene, korry)\nOverfeed(korry, becka)\nOverfeed(korry, allene)\nSell(korry, allene)\nOutclassed(korry) and not Sell(allene, korry) -> Leech(allene, becka)\nforall x (Recoilless(x) -> Overfeed(x, becka))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, becka) -> Recoilless(x))\nforall x (Sell(x, becka) and Outclassed(becka) -> Leech(x, korry))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, korry) -> Sell(korry, becka))\nforall x (Sell(x, korry) and not Zaftig(x) -> Sell(x, allene))\nforall x (Parttime(x) -> Sell(x, becka))\nforall x (Sell(x, allene) -> Outclassed(x))\n\nRecoilless(korry)\n\nOverfeed(korry, becka) and forall x (Overfeed(x, becka) -> Recoilless(x)) -> therefore Recoilless(korry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The dulsea forearm the jenda. The dulsea stopple the jenda. The dulsea highjack the mureil. The mureil does not visit the jenda. The jenda forearm the dulsea. The jenda forearm the mureil. The jenda highjack the mureil. If the jenda is clogging and the mureil does not visit the jenda then the mureil stopple the dulsea. If something is funerary then it forearm the dulsea. If something forearm the dulsea then it is funerary. If something highjack the dulsea and the dulsea is clogging then it stopple the jenda. If something forearm the jenda then the jenda highjack the dulsea. If something highjack the jenda and it is not tottery then it highjack the mureil. If something is orthogonal then it highjack the dulsea. If something highjack the mureil then it is clogging. The dulsea is not clogging.", "logic": "\nForearm(dulsea, jenda)\nStopple(dulsea, jenda)\nHighjack(dulsea, mureil)\nnot Highjack(mureil, jenda)\nForearm(jenda, dulsea)\nForearm(jenda, mureil)\nHighjack(jenda, mureil)\nClogging(jenda) and not Highjack(mureil, jenda) -> Stopple(mureil, dulsea)\nforall x (Funerary(x) -> Forearm(x, dulsea))\nforall x (Forearm(x, dulsea) -> Funerary(x))\nforall x (Highjack(x, dulsea) and Clogging(dulsea) -> Stopple(x, jenda))\nforall x (Forearm(x, jenda) -> Highjack(jenda, dulsea))\nforall x (Highjack(x, jenda) and not Tottery(x) -> Highjack(x, mureil))\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) -> Highjack(x, dulsea))\nforall x (Highjack(x, mureil) -> Clogging(x))\n\nnot Clogging(dulsea)\n\nHighjack(dulsea, mureil) and forall x (Highjack(x, mureil) -> Clogging(x)) -> therefore Clogging(dulsea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The janeta reform the cristen. The janeta lampoon the cristen. The janeta dictate the agna. The agna does not visit the cristen. The cristen reform the janeta. The cristen reform the agna. The cristen dictate the agna. If the cristen is enervated and the agna does not visit the cristen then the agna lampoon the janeta. If something is unheated then it reform the janeta. If something reform the janeta then it is unheated. If something dictate the janeta and the janeta is enervated then it lampoon the cristen. If something reform the cristen then the cristen dictate the janeta. If something dictate the cristen and it is not redheaded then it dictate the agna. If something is unaided then it dictate the janeta. If something dictate the agna then it is enervated. The cristen lampoon the cristen.", "logic": "\nReform(janeta, cristen)\nLampoon(janeta, cristen)\nDictate(janeta, agna)\nnot Dictate(agna, cristen)\nReform(cristen, janeta)\nReform(cristen, agna)\nDictate(cristen, agna)\nEnervated(cristen) and not Dictate(agna, cristen) -> Lampoon(agna, janeta)\nforall x (Unheated(x) -> Reform(x, janeta))\nforall x (Reform(x, janeta) -> Unheated(x))\nforall x (Dictate(x, janeta) and Enervated(janeta) -> Lampoon(x, cristen))\nforall x (Reform(x, cristen) -> Dictate(cristen, janeta))\nforall x (Dictate(x, cristen) and not Redheaded(x) -> Dictate(x, agna))\nforall x (Unaided(x) -> Dictate(x, janeta))\nforall x (Dictate(x, agna) -> Enervated(x))\n\nLampoon(cristen, cristen)\n\nReform(janeta, cristen) and forall x (Reform(x, cristen) -> Dictate(cristen, janeta)) -> therefore Dictate(cristen, janeta) Dictate(janeta, agna) and forall x (Dictate(x, agna) -> Enervated(x)) -> therefore Enervated(janeta) Dictate(cristen, janeta) and Enervated(janeta) and forall x (Dictate(x, janeta) and Enervated(janeta) -> Lampoon(x, cristen)) -> therefore Lampoon(cristen, cristen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The katleen stunt the hoyt. The katleen tantalize the hoyt. The katleen puzzle the cassandre. The cassandre does not visit the hoyt. The hoyt stunt the katleen. The hoyt stunt the cassandre. The hoyt puzzle the cassandre. If the hoyt is dreary and the cassandre does not visit the hoyt then the cassandre tantalize the katleen. If something is vernal then it stunt the katleen. If something stunt the katleen then it is vernal. If something puzzle the katleen and the katleen is dreary then it tantalize the hoyt. If something stunt the hoyt then the hoyt puzzle the katleen. If something puzzle the hoyt and it is not areolar then it puzzle the cassandre. If something is wysiwyg then it puzzle the katleen. If something puzzle the cassandre then it is dreary. The cassandre does not see the katleen.", "logic": "\nStunt(katleen, hoyt)\nTantalize(katleen, hoyt)\nPuzzle(katleen, cassandre)\nnot Puzzle(cassandre, hoyt)\nStunt(hoyt, katleen)\nStunt(hoyt, cassandre)\nPuzzle(hoyt, cassandre)\nDreary(hoyt) and not Puzzle(cassandre, hoyt) -> Tantalize(cassandre, katleen)\nforall x (Vernal(x) -> Stunt(x, katleen))\nforall x (Stunt(x, katleen) -> Vernal(x))\nforall x (Puzzle(x, katleen) and Dreary(katleen) -> Tantalize(x, hoyt))\nforall x (Stunt(x, hoyt) -> Puzzle(hoyt, katleen))\nforall x (Puzzle(x, hoyt) and not Areolar(x) -> Puzzle(x, cassandre))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) -> Puzzle(x, katleen))\nforall x (Puzzle(x, cassandre) -> Dreary(x))\n\nnot Tantalize(cassandre, katleen)\n\nPuzzle(hoyt, cassandre) and forall x (Puzzle(x, cassandre) -> Dreary(x)) -> therefore Dreary(hoyt) Dreary(hoyt) and not Puzzle(cassandre, hoyt) and Dreary(hoyt) and not Puzzle(cassandre, hoyt) -> Tantalize(cassandre, katleen) -> therefore Tantalize(cassandre, katleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The ediva holler the kiele. The ediva dominate the kiele. The ediva mimeograph the skipp. The skipp does not visit the kiele. The kiele holler the ediva. The kiele holler the skipp. The kiele mimeograph the skipp. If the kiele is hunted and the skipp does not visit the kiele then the skipp dominate the ediva. If something is babylonian then it holler the ediva. If something holler the ediva then it is babylonian. If something mimeograph the ediva and the ediva is hunted then it dominate the kiele. If something holler the kiele then the kiele mimeograph the ediva. If something mimeograph the kiele and it is not hesitating then it mimeograph the skipp. If something is punctured then it mimeograph the ediva. If something mimeograph the skipp then it is hunted. The skipp does not visit the ediva.", "logic": "\nHoller(ediva, kiele)\nDominate(ediva, kiele)\nMimeograph(ediva, skipp)\nnot Mimeograph(skipp, kiele)\nHoller(kiele, ediva)\nHoller(kiele, skipp)\nMimeograph(kiele, skipp)\nHunted(kiele) and not Mimeograph(skipp, kiele) -> Dominate(skipp, ediva)\nforall x (Babylonian(x) -> Holler(x, ediva))\nforall x (Holler(x, ediva) -> Babylonian(x))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, ediva) and Hunted(ediva) -> Dominate(x, kiele))\nforall x (Holler(x, kiele) -> Mimeograph(kiele, ediva))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, kiele) and not Hesitating(x) -> Mimeograph(x, skipp))\nforall x (Punctured(x) -> Mimeograph(x, ediva))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, skipp) -> Hunted(x))\n\nnot Mimeograph(skipp, ediva)\n\nforall x (Punctured(x) -> Mimeograph(x, ediva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The nelsen paddle the spence. The nelsen renegade the spence. The nelsen colour the selby. The selby does not visit the spence. The spence paddle the nelsen. The spence paddle the selby. The spence colour the selby. If the spence is demotic and the selby does not visit the spence then the selby renegade the nelsen. If something is asterisked then it paddle the nelsen. If something paddle the nelsen then it is asterisked. If something colour the nelsen and the nelsen is demotic then it renegade the spence. If something paddle the spence then the spence colour the nelsen. If something colour the spence and it is not roundish then it colour the selby. If something is pontifical then it colour the nelsen. If something colour the selby then it is demotic. The selby is demotic.", "logic": "\nPaddle(nelsen, spence)\nRenegade(nelsen, spence)\nColour(nelsen, selby)\nnot Colour(selby, spence)\nPaddle(spence, nelsen)\nPaddle(spence, selby)\nColour(spence, selby)\nDemotic(spence) and not Colour(selby, spence) -> Renegade(selby, nelsen)\nforall x (Asterisked(x) -> Paddle(x, nelsen))\nforall x (Paddle(x, nelsen) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Colour(x, nelsen) and Demotic(nelsen) -> Renegade(x, spence))\nforall x (Paddle(x, spence) -> Colour(spence, nelsen))\nforall x (Colour(x, spence) and not Roundish(x) -> Colour(x, selby))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> Colour(x, nelsen))\nforall x (Colour(x, selby) -> Demotic(x))\n\nDemotic(selby)\n\nforall x (Colour(x, selby) -> Demotic(x)) <- forall x (Colour(x, spence) and not Roundish(x) -> Colour(x, selby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The alexi kennel the jean. The alexi luff the jean. The alexi journey the sigrid. The sigrid does not visit the jean. The jean kennel the alexi. The jean kennel the sigrid. The jean journey the sigrid. If the jean is overgrown and the sigrid does not visit the jean then the sigrid luff the alexi. If something is admirable then it kennel the alexi. If something kennel the alexi then it is admirable. If something journey the alexi and the alexi is overgrown then it luff the jean. If something kennel the jean then the jean journey the alexi. If something journey the jean and it is not talented then it journey the sigrid. If something is lopsided then it journey the alexi. If something journey the sigrid then it is overgrown. The alexi does not eat the alexi.", "logic": "\nKennel(alexi, jean)\nLuff(alexi, jean)\nJourney(alexi, sigrid)\nnot Journey(sigrid, jean)\nKennel(jean, alexi)\nKennel(jean, sigrid)\nJourney(jean, sigrid)\nOvergrown(jean) and not Journey(sigrid, jean) -> Luff(sigrid, alexi)\nforall x (Admirable(x) -> Kennel(x, alexi))\nforall x (Kennel(x, alexi) -> Admirable(x))\nforall x (Journey(x, alexi) and Overgrown(alexi) -> Luff(x, jean))\nforall x (Kennel(x, jean) -> Journey(jean, alexi))\nforall x (Journey(x, jean) and not Talented(x) -> Journey(x, sigrid))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Journey(x, alexi))\nforall x (Journey(x, sigrid) -> Overgrown(x))\n\nnot Kennel(alexi, alexi)\n\nforall x (Admirable(x) -> Kennel(x, alexi)) <- forall x (Kennel(x, alexi) -> Admirable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The opal guarantee the prent. The opal eulogize the prent. The opal vilipend the cookie. The cookie does not visit the prent. The prent guarantee the opal. The prent guarantee the cookie. The prent vilipend the cookie. If the prent is nigerian and the cookie does not visit the prent then the cookie eulogize the opal. If something is modular then it guarantee the opal. If something guarantee the opal then it is modular. If something vilipend the opal and the opal is nigerian then it eulogize the prent. If something guarantee the prent then the prent vilipend the opal. If something vilipend the prent and it is not rustling then it vilipend the cookie. If something is continuous then it vilipend the opal. If something vilipend the cookie then it is nigerian. The opal eulogize the cookie.", "logic": "\nGuarantee(opal, prent)\nEulogize(opal, prent)\nVilipend(opal, cookie)\nnot Vilipend(cookie, prent)\nGuarantee(prent, opal)\nGuarantee(prent, cookie)\nVilipend(prent, cookie)\nNigerian(prent) and not Vilipend(cookie, prent) -> Eulogize(cookie, opal)\nforall x (Modular(x) -> Guarantee(x, opal))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, opal) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Vilipend(x, opal) and Nigerian(opal) -> Eulogize(x, prent))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, prent) -> Vilipend(prent, opal))\nforall x (Vilipend(x, prent) and not Rustling(x) -> Vilipend(x, cookie))\nforall x (Continuous(x) -> Vilipend(x, opal))\nforall x (Vilipend(x, cookie) -> Nigerian(x))\n\nEulogize(opal, cookie)\n\nEulogize(opal, cookie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The sergei liberalize the salvador. The sergei obtrude the salvador. The sergei squinch the rollin. The rollin does not visit the salvador. The salvador liberalize the sergei. The salvador liberalize the rollin. The salvador squinch the rollin. If the salvador is pressing and the rollin does not visit the salvador then the rollin obtrude the sergei. If something is passee then it liberalize the sergei. If something liberalize the sergei then it is passee. If something squinch the sergei and the sergei is pressing then it obtrude the salvador. If something liberalize the salvador then the salvador squinch the sergei. If something squinch the salvador and it is not guttural then it squinch the rollin. If something is mandibular then it squinch the sergei. If something squinch the rollin then it is pressing. The salvador does not see the rollin.", "logic": "\nLiberalize(sergei, salvador)\nObtrude(sergei, salvador)\nSquinch(sergei, rollin)\nnot Squinch(rollin, salvador)\nLiberalize(salvador, sergei)\nLiberalize(salvador, rollin)\nSquinch(salvador, rollin)\nPressing(salvador) and not Squinch(rollin, salvador) -> Obtrude(rollin, sergei)\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Liberalize(x, sergei))\nforall x (Liberalize(x, sergei) -> Passee(x))\nforall x (Squinch(x, sergei) and Pressing(sergei) -> Obtrude(x, salvador))\nforall x (Liberalize(x, salvador) -> Squinch(salvador, sergei))\nforall x (Squinch(x, salvador) and not Guttural(x) -> Squinch(x, rollin))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Squinch(x, sergei))\nforall x (Squinch(x, rollin) -> Pressing(x))\n\nnot Obtrude(salvador, rollin)\n\nnot Obtrude(salvador, rollin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "The graehme honk the sella. The graehme reforest the sella. The graehme contend the rodrigo. The rodrigo does not visit the sella. The sella honk the graehme. The sella honk the rodrigo. The sella contend the rodrigo. If the sella is inhalant and the rodrigo does not visit the sella then the rodrigo reforest the graehme. If something is barmy then it honk the graehme. If something honk the graehme then it is barmy. If something contend the graehme and the graehme is inhalant then it reforest the sella. If something honk the sella then the sella contend the graehme. If something contend the sella and it is not dietetical then it contend the rodrigo. If something is unreduced then it contend the graehme. If something contend the rodrigo then it is inhalant. The sella is rough.", "logic": "\nHonk(graehme, sella)\nReforest(graehme, sella)\nContend(graehme, rodrigo)\nnot Contend(rodrigo, sella)\nHonk(sella, graehme)\nHonk(sella, rodrigo)\nContend(sella, rodrigo)\nInhalant(sella) and not Contend(rodrigo, sella) -> Reforest(rodrigo, graehme)\nforall x (Barmy(x) -> Honk(x, graehme))\nforall x (Honk(x, graehme) -> Barmy(x))\nforall x (Contend(x, graehme) and Inhalant(graehme) -> Reforest(x, sella))\nforall x (Honk(x, sella) -> Contend(sella, graehme))\nforall x (Contend(x, sella) and not Dietetical(x) -> Contend(x, rodrigo))\nforall x (Unreduced(x) -> Contend(x, graehme))\nforall x (Contend(x, rodrigo) -> Inhalant(x))\n\nRough(sella)\n\nRough(sella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-567"} {"premises": "Jill is uneasy. Jill is aecial. Jill is incurable. Jill is worshipful. Jill is clawed. Jill is plethoric. Jill is dialectic. Colline is uneasy. Colline is incurable. Colline is worshipful. Colline is clawed. Colline is plethoric. Colline is dialectic. Hebert is aecial. Hebert is incurable. Hebert is worshipful. If something is aecial then it is uneasy. All incurable, dialectic things are plethoric. If something is incurable then it is clawed. Young, aecial things are plethoric. If something is worshipful and clawed then it is plethoric. If Jill is aecial then Jill is worshipful. Kind things are uneasy. Big things are incurable. Jill is clawed.", "logic": "\nUneasy(jill)\nAecial(jill)\nIncurable(jill)\nWorshipful(jill)\nClawed(jill)\nPlethoric(jill)\nDialectic(jill)\nUneasy(colline)\nIncurable(colline)\nWorshipful(colline)\nClawed(colline)\nPlethoric(colline)\nDialectic(colline)\nAecial(hebert)\nIncurable(hebert)\nWorshipful(hebert)\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Incurable(x) and Dialectic(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nforall x (Incurable(x) -> Clawed(x))\nforall x (Dialectic(x) and Aecial(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) and Clawed(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nAecial(jill) -> Worshipful(jill)\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Incurable(x))\n\nClawed(jill)\n\ntherefore Clawed(jill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Quintin is enolic. Quintin is rimy. Quintin is uniate. Quintin is ungainly. Quintin is directing. Quintin is abstruse. Quintin is cycloid. Betsey is enolic. Betsey is uniate. Betsey is ungainly. Betsey is directing. Betsey is abstruse. Betsey is cycloid. Cole is rimy. Cole is uniate. Cole is ungainly. If something is rimy then it is enolic. All uniate, cycloid things are abstruse. If something is uniate then it is directing. Young, rimy things are abstruse. If something is ungainly and directing then it is abstruse. If Quintin is rimy then Quintin is ungainly. Kind things are enolic. Big things are uniate. Quintin is not abstruse.", "logic": "\nEnolic(quintin)\nRimy(quintin)\nUniate(quintin)\nUngainly(quintin)\nDirecting(quintin)\nAbstruse(quintin)\nCycloid(quintin)\nEnolic(betsey)\nUniate(betsey)\nUngainly(betsey)\nDirecting(betsey)\nAbstruse(betsey)\nCycloid(betsey)\nRimy(cole)\nUniate(cole)\nUngainly(cole)\nforall x (Rimy(x) -> Enolic(x))\nforall x (Uniate(x) and Cycloid(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Uniate(x) -> Directing(x))\nforall x (Cycloid(x) and Rimy(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Ungainly(x) and Directing(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nRimy(quintin) -> Ungainly(quintin)\nforall x (Ungainly(x) -> Enolic(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) -> Uniate(x))\n\nnot Abstruse(quintin)\n\ntherefore Abstruse(quintin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Jedediah is piffling. Jedediah is tropic. Jedediah is monovalent. Jedediah is abomasal. Jedediah is puppylike. Jedediah is walking. Jedediah is copernican. Lawrence is piffling. Lawrence is monovalent. Lawrence is abomasal. Lawrence is puppylike. Lawrence is walking. Lawrence is copernican. Wright is tropic. Wright is monovalent. Wright is abomasal. If something is tropic then it is piffling. All monovalent, copernican things are walking. If something is monovalent then it is puppylike. Young, tropic things are walking. If something is abomasal and puppylike then it is walking. If Jedediah is tropic then Jedediah is abomasal. Kind things are piffling. Big things are monovalent. Wright is puppylike.", "logic": "\nPiffling(jedediah)\nTropic(jedediah)\nMonovalent(jedediah)\nAbomasal(jedediah)\nPuppylike(jedediah)\nWalking(jedediah)\nCopernican(jedediah)\nPiffling(lawrence)\nMonovalent(lawrence)\nAbomasal(lawrence)\nPuppylike(lawrence)\nWalking(lawrence)\nCopernican(lawrence)\nTropic(wright)\nMonovalent(wright)\nAbomasal(wright)\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Piffling(x))\nforall x (Monovalent(x) and Copernican(x) -> Walking(x))\nforall x (Monovalent(x) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Copernican(x) and Tropic(x) -> Walking(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Puppylike(x) -> Walking(x))\nTropic(jedediah) -> Abomasal(jedediah)\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Piffling(x))\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> Monovalent(x))\n\nPuppylike(wright)\n\nMonovalent(wright) and forall x (Monovalent(x) -> Puppylike(x)) -> therefore Puppylike(wright)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Ann is leisured. Ann is rheumatic. Ann is jacobean. Ann is bounded. Ann is frothy. Ann is corrective. Ann is humic. Jeraldine is leisured. Jeraldine is jacobean. Jeraldine is bounded. Jeraldine is frothy. Jeraldine is corrective. Jeraldine is humic. Moe is rheumatic. Moe is jacobean. Moe is bounded. If something is rheumatic then it is leisured. All jacobean, humic things are corrective. If something is jacobean then it is frothy. Young, rheumatic things are corrective. If something is bounded and frothy then it is corrective. If Ann is rheumatic then Ann is bounded. Kind things are leisured. Big things are jacobean. Moe is not leisured.", "logic": "\nLeisured(ann)\nRheumatic(ann)\nJacobean(ann)\nBounded(ann)\nFrothy(ann)\nCorrective(ann)\nHumic(ann)\nLeisured(jeraldine)\nJacobean(jeraldine)\nBounded(jeraldine)\nFrothy(jeraldine)\nCorrective(jeraldine)\nHumic(jeraldine)\nRheumatic(moe)\nJacobean(moe)\nBounded(moe)\nforall x (Rheumatic(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) and Humic(x) -> Corrective(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Humic(x) and Rheumatic(x) -> Corrective(x))\nforall x (Bounded(x) and Frothy(x) -> Corrective(x))\nRheumatic(ann) -> Bounded(ann)\nforall x (Bounded(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Jacobean(x))\n\nnot Leisured(moe)\n\nRheumatic(moe) and forall x (Rheumatic(x) -> Leisured(x)) -> therefore Leisured(moe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Lida is remediable. Lida is caesarean. Lida is bhutanese. Lida is goodish. Lida is oxidized. Lida is unbearable. Lida is unrentable. Timmie is remediable. Timmie is bhutanese. Timmie is goodish. Timmie is oxidized. Timmie is unbearable. Timmie is unrentable. Tanny is caesarean. Tanny is bhutanese. Tanny is goodish. If something is caesarean then it is remediable. All bhutanese, unrentable things are unbearable. If something is bhutanese then it is oxidized. Young, caesarean things are unbearable. If something is goodish and oxidized then it is unbearable. If Lida is caesarean then Lida is goodish. Kind things are remediable. Big things are bhutanese. Tanny is unbearable.", "logic": "\nRemediable(lida)\nCaesarean(lida)\nBhutanese(lida)\nGoodish(lida)\nOxidized(lida)\nUnbearable(lida)\nUnrentable(lida)\nRemediable(timmie)\nBhutanese(timmie)\nGoodish(timmie)\nOxidized(timmie)\nUnbearable(timmie)\nUnrentable(timmie)\nCaesarean(tanny)\nBhutanese(tanny)\nGoodish(tanny)\nforall x (Caesarean(x) -> Remediable(x))\nforall x (Bhutanese(x) and Unrentable(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nforall x (Bhutanese(x) -> Oxidized(x))\nforall x (Unrentable(x) and Caesarean(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nforall x (Goodish(x) and Oxidized(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nCaesarean(lida) -> Goodish(lida)\nforall x (Goodish(x) -> Remediable(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) -> Bhutanese(x))\n\nUnbearable(tanny)\n\nBhutanese(tanny) and forall x (Bhutanese(x) -> Oxidized(x)) -> therefore Oxidized(tanny) Goodish(tanny) and Oxidized(tanny) and forall x (Goodish(x) and Oxidized(x) -> Unbearable(x)) -> therefore Unbearable(tanny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Irina is burnt. Irina is artful. Irina is atonal. Irina is allusive. Irina is abducting. Irina is bilobate. Irina is homicidal. Sydelle is burnt. Sydelle is atonal. Sydelle is allusive. Sydelle is abducting. Sydelle is bilobate. Sydelle is homicidal. Callie is artful. Callie is atonal. Callie is allusive. If something is artful then it is burnt. All atonal, homicidal things are bilobate. If something is atonal then it is abducting. Young, artful things are bilobate. If something is allusive and abducting then it is bilobate. If Irina is artful then Irina is allusive. Kind things are burnt. Big things are atonal. Callie is not bilobate.", "logic": "\nBurnt(irina)\nArtful(irina)\nAtonal(irina)\nAllusive(irina)\nAbducting(irina)\nBilobate(irina)\nHomicidal(irina)\nBurnt(sydelle)\nAtonal(sydelle)\nAllusive(sydelle)\nAbducting(sydelle)\nBilobate(sydelle)\nHomicidal(sydelle)\nArtful(callie)\nAtonal(callie)\nAllusive(callie)\nforall x (Artful(x) -> Burnt(x))\nforall x (Atonal(x) and Homicidal(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Atonal(x) -> Abducting(x))\nforall x (Homicidal(x) and Artful(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Allusive(x) and Abducting(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nArtful(irina) -> Allusive(irina)\nforall x (Allusive(x) -> Burnt(x))\nforall x (Burnt(x) -> Atonal(x))\n\nnot Bilobate(callie)\n\nAtonal(callie) and forall x (Atonal(x) -> Abducting(x)) -> therefore Abducting(callie) Allusive(callie) and Abducting(callie) and forall x (Allusive(x) and Abducting(x) -> Bilobate(x)) -> therefore Bilobate(callie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Bennett is dusky. Bennett is annelid. Bennett is unseeing. Bennett is awol. Bennett is spiderlike. Bennett is fateful. Bennett is benthic. Iormina is dusky. Iormina is unseeing. Iormina is awol. Iormina is spiderlike. Iormina is fateful. Iormina is benthic. Catie is annelid. Catie is unseeing. Catie is awol. If something is annelid then it is dusky. All unseeing, benthic things are fateful. If something is unseeing then it is spiderlike. Young, annelid things are fateful. If something is awol and spiderlike then it is fateful. If Bennett is annelid then Bennett is awol. Kind things are dusky. Big things are unseeing. Iormina is not annelid.", "logic": "\nDusky(bennett)\nAnnelid(bennett)\nUnseeing(bennett)\nAwol(bennett)\nSpiderlike(bennett)\nFateful(bennett)\nBenthic(bennett)\nDusky(iormina)\nUnseeing(iormina)\nAwol(iormina)\nSpiderlike(iormina)\nFateful(iormina)\nBenthic(iormina)\nAnnelid(catie)\nUnseeing(catie)\nAwol(catie)\nforall x (Annelid(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Unseeing(x) and Benthic(x) -> Fateful(x))\nforall x (Unseeing(x) -> Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Benthic(x) and Annelid(x) -> Fateful(x))\nforall x (Awol(x) and Spiderlike(x) -> Fateful(x))\nAnnelid(bennett) -> Awol(bennett)\nforall x (Awol(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) -> Unseeing(x))\n\nnot Annelid(iormina)\n\nnot Annelid(iormina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Tarrant is taunting. Tarrant is avascular. Tarrant is lengthways. Tarrant is relocated. Tarrant is teutonic. Tarrant is bustling. Tarrant is divalent. Cherri is taunting. Cherri is lengthways. Cherri is relocated. Cherri is teutonic. Cherri is bustling. Cherri is divalent. Martin is avascular. Martin is lengthways. Martin is relocated. If something is avascular then it is taunting. All lengthways, divalent things are bustling. If something is lengthways then it is teutonic. Young, avascular things are bustling. If something is relocated and teutonic then it is bustling. If Tarrant is avascular then Tarrant is relocated. Kind things are taunting. Big things are lengthways. Martin is divalent.", "logic": "\nTaunting(tarrant)\nAvascular(tarrant)\nLengthways(tarrant)\nRelocated(tarrant)\nTeutonic(tarrant)\nBustling(tarrant)\nDivalent(tarrant)\nTaunting(cherri)\nLengthways(cherri)\nRelocated(cherri)\nTeutonic(cherri)\nBustling(cherri)\nDivalent(cherri)\nAvascular(martin)\nLengthways(martin)\nRelocated(martin)\nforall x (Avascular(x) -> Taunting(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) and Divalent(x) -> Bustling(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) -> Teutonic(x))\nforall x (Divalent(x) and Avascular(x) -> Bustling(x))\nforall x (Relocated(x) and Teutonic(x) -> Bustling(x))\nAvascular(tarrant) -> Relocated(tarrant)\nforall x (Relocated(x) -> Taunting(x))\nforall x (Taunting(x) -> Lengthways(x))\n\nDivalent(martin)\n\nDivalent(martin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-196"} {"premises": "Nancy is vile. Nancy is aged. Emelia is storied. If someone is quondam and storied then they are squirting. Rough, strained people are boreal. All vile people are strained. Nancy is vile.", "logic": "\nVile(nancy)\nAged(nancy)\nStoried(emelia)\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Storied(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Vile(x) and Strained(x) -> Boreal(x))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Strained(x))\n\nVile(nancy)\n\ntherefore Vile(nancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Lynde is threadbare. Lynde is rickety. Wilmer is phantasmal. If someone is spic and phantasmal then they are tympanitic. Rough, xiii people are nicaean. All threadbare people are xiii. Lynde is not rickety.", "logic": "\nThreadbare(lynde)\nRickety(lynde)\nPhantasmal(wilmer)\nforall x (Spic(x) and Phantasmal(x) -> Tympanitic(x))\nforall x (Threadbare(x) and Xiii(x) -> Nicaean(x))\nforall x (Threadbare(x) -> Xiii(x))\n\nnot Rickety(lynde)\n\ntherefore Rickety(lynde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Leonidas is final. Leonidas is prenominal. Jaymee is unwieldy. If someone is classical and unwieldy then they are synonymous. Rough, embedded people are lean. All final people are embedded. Leonidas is embedded.", "logic": "\nFinal(leonidas)\nPrenominal(leonidas)\nUnwieldy(jaymee)\nforall x (Classical(x) and Unwieldy(x) -> Synonymous(x))\nforall x (Final(x) and Embedded(x) -> Lean(x))\nforall x (Final(x) -> Embedded(x))\n\nEmbedded(leonidas)\n\nFinal(leonidas) and forall x (Final(x) -> Embedded(x)) -> therefore Embedded(leonidas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Stillmann is sericeous. Stillmann is remote. Tyson is chintzy. If someone is standard and chintzy then they are lambent. Rough, couthy people are sympatric. All sericeous people are couthy. Stillmann is not couthy.", "logic": "\nSericeous(stillmann)\nRemote(stillmann)\nChintzy(tyson)\nforall x (Standard(x) and Chintzy(x) -> Lambent(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Couthy(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Couthy(x))\n\nnot Couthy(stillmann)\n\nSericeous(stillmann) and forall x (Sericeous(x) -> Couthy(x)) -> therefore Couthy(stillmann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Sibyl is hexed. Sibyl is attested. Eydie is solitary. If someone is shallow and solitary then they are nidicolous. Rough, climatical people are orwellian. All hexed people are climatical. Sibyl is orwellian.", "logic": "\nHexed(sibyl)\nAttested(sibyl)\nSolitary(eydie)\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Solitary(x) -> Nidicolous(x))\nforall x (Hexed(x) and Climatical(x) -> Orwellian(x))\nforall x (Hexed(x) -> Climatical(x))\n\nOrwellian(sibyl)\n\nHexed(sibyl) and forall x (Hexed(x) -> Climatical(x)) -> therefore Climatical(sibyl) Hexed(sibyl) and Climatical(sibyl) and forall x (Hexed(x) and Climatical(x) -> Orwellian(x)) -> therefore Orwellian(sibyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Binny is polytonal. Binny is caducean. Constance is bicolour. If someone is cutthroat and bicolour then they are injectable. Rough, coplanar people are autosomal. All polytonal people are coplanar. Binny is not autosomal.", "logic": "\nPolytonal(binny)\nCaducean(binny)\nBicolour(constance)\nforall x (Cutthroat(x) and Bicolour(x) -> Injectable(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) and Coplanar(x) -> Autosomal(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Coplanar(x))\n\nnot Autosomal(binny)\n\nPolytonal(binny) and forall x (Polytonal(x) -> Coplanar(x)) -> therefore Coplanar(binny) Polytonal(binny) and Coplanar(binny) and forall x (Polytonal(x) and Coplanar(x) -> Autosomal(x)) -> therefore Autosomal(binny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Maritsa is appetent. Maritsa is plantal. Jacques is unenviable. If someone is deformed and unenviable then they are somber. Rough, chimeric people are affined. All appetent people are chimeric. Jacques is not somber.", "logic": "\nAppetent(maritsa)\nPlantal(maritsa)\nUnenviable(jacques)\nforall x (Deformed(x) and Unenviable(x) -> Somber(x))\nforall x (Appetent(x) and Chimeric(x) -> Affined(x))\nforall x (Appetent(x) -> Chimeric(x))\n\nnot Somber(jacques)\n\nforall x (Deformed(x) and Unenviable(x) -> Somber(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Levon is malposed. Levon is spidery. Tabb is volcanic. If someone is ecdemic and volcanic then they are unhearing. Rough, revenant people are adrenergic. All malposed people are revenant. Tabb is revenant.", "logic": "\nMalposed(levon)\nSpidery(levon)\nVolcanic(tabb)\nforall x (Ecdemic(x) and Volcanic(x) -> Unhearing(x))\nforall x (Malposed(x) and Revenant(x) -> Adrenergic(x))\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> Revenant(x))\n\nRevenant(tabb)\n\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> Revenant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Karmen is oblique. Karmen is apostate. Carlena is accrued. If someone is canopied and accrued then they are stretchy. Rough, saccharine people are awkward. All oblique people are saccharine. Carlena is not awkward.", "logic": "\nOblique(karmen)\nApostate(karmen)\nAccrued(carlena)\nforall x (Canopied(x) and Accrued(x) -> Stretchy(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) and Saccharine(x) -> Awkward(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) -> Saccharine(x))\n\nnot Awkward(carlena)\n\nforall x (Oblique(x) and Saccharine(x) -> Awkward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Andria is snuffly. Andria is achromic. Velma is chapfallen. If someone is fecal and chapfallen then they are perturbed. Rough, hearsay people are wayfaring. All snuffly people are hearsay. Velma is achromic.", "logic": "\nSnuffly(andria)\nAchromic(andria)\nChapfallen(velma)\nforall x (Fecal(x) and Chapfallen(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Snuffly(x) and Hearsay(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Snuffly(x) -> Hearsay(x))\n\nAchromic(velma)\n\nAchromic(velma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Dallas is blackish. Dallas is whatsoever. Vikki is impure. If someone is allylic and impure then they are bicornate. Rough, inactive people are acneiform. All blackish people are inactive. Vikki is not blackish.", "logic": "\nBlackish(dallas)\nWhatsoever(dallas)\nImpure(vikki)\nforall x (Allylic(x) and Impure(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Blackish(x) and Inactive(x) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Inactive(x))\n\nnot Blackish(vikki)\n\nnot Blackish(vikki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "Elissa is zapotec. Elissa is unhallowed. Catarina is ironshod. If someone is excess and ironshod then they are heretical. Rough, testicular people are antebellum. All zapotec people are testicular. Elissa is excess.", "logic": "\nZapotec(elissa)\nUnhallowed(elissa)\nIronshod(catarina)\nforall x (Excess(x) and Ironshod(x) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Zapotec(x) and Testicular(x) -> Antebellum(x))\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Testicular(x))\n\nExcess(elissa)\n\nExcess(elissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2394"} {"premises": "The emmaline lose the florinda. The florinda is angered. The elvin eternize the florinda. The cami is animistic. If something is animistic then it impede the florinda. If the elvin eternize the emmaline then the emmaline impede the cami. If something impede the florinda then it does not visit the elvin. If something impede the florinda then the florinda lose the emmaline. If something is animistic and ninetieth then it does not like the elvin. If the elvin is angered and the elvin eternize the emmaline then the elvin is not stale. The florinda is angered.", "logic": "\nLose(emmaline, florinda)\nAngered(florinda)\nEternize(elvin, florinda)\nAnimistic(cami)\nforall x (Animistic(x) -> Impede(x, florinda))\nEternize(elvin, emmaline) -> Impede(emmaline, cami)\nforall x (Impede(x, florinda) -> not Lose(x, elvin))\nforall x (Impede(x, florinda) -> Lose(florinda, emmaline))\nforall x (Animistic(x) and Ninetieth(x) -> not Eternize(x, elvin))\nAngered(elvin) and Eternize(elvin, emmaline) -> not Stale(elvin)\n\nAngered(florinda)\n\ntherefore Angered(florinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The northrop lipread the edyth. The edyth is stabilised. The barnett titter the edyth. The rosalind is bubaline. If something is bubaline then it slenderise the edyth. If the barnett titter the northrop then the northrop slenderise the rosalind. If something slenderise the edyth then it does not visit the barnett. If something slenderise the edyth then the edyth lipread the northrop. If something is bubaline and unused then it does not like the barnett. If the barnett is stabilised and the barnett titter the northrop then the barnett is not frothing. The rosalind is not bubaline.", "logic": "\nLipread(northrop, edyth)\nStabilised(edyth)\nTitter(barnett, edyth)\nBubaline(rosalind)\nforall x (Bubaline(x) -> Slenderise(x, edyth))\nTitter(barnett, northrop) -> Slenderise(northrop, rosalind)\nforall x (Slenderise(x, edyth) -> not Lipread(x, barnett))\nforall x (Slenderise(x, edyth) -> Lipread(edyth, northrop))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) and Unused(x) -> not Titter(x, barnett))\nStabilised(barnett) and Titter(barnett, northrop) -> not Frothing(barnett)\n\nnot Bubaline(rosalind)\n\ntherefore Bubaline(rosalind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The binnie monitor the scarface. The scarface is silverish. The jervis park the scarface. The magdalene is spicy. If something is spicy then it linger the scarface. If the jervis park the binnie then the binnie linger the magdalene. If something linger the scarface then it does not visit the jervis. If something linger the scarface then the scarface monitor the binnie. If something is spicy and knowable then it does not like the jervis. If the jervis is silverish and the jervis park the binnie then the jervis is not adrift. The magdalene linger the scarface.", "logic": "\nMonitor(binnie, scarface)\nSilverish(scarface)\nPark(jervis, scarface)\nSpicy(magdalene)\nforall x (Spicy(x) -> Linger(x, scarface))\nPark(jervis, binnie) -> Linger(binnie, magdalene)\nforall x (Linger(x, scarface) -> not Monitor(x, jervis))\nforall x (Linger(x, scarface) -> Monitor(scarface, binnie))\nforall x (Spicy(x) and Knowable(x) -> not Park(x, jervis))\nSilverish(jervis) and Park(jervis, binnie) -> not Adrift(jervis)\n\nLinger(magdalene, scarface)\n\nSpicy(magdalene) and forall x (Spicy(x) -> Linger(x, scarface)) -> therefore Linger(magdalene, scarface)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The corry cavort the maible. The maible is licenced. The candi nett the maible. The jeanna is robustious. If something is robustious then it verbify the maible. If the candi nett the corry then the corry verbify the jeanna. If something verbify the maible then it does not visit the candi. If something verbify the maible then the maible cavort the corry. If something is robustious and dirt then it does not like the candi. If the candi is licenced and the candi nett the corry then the candi is not mendacious. The jeanna does not see the maible.", "logic": "\nCavort(corry, maible)\nLicenced(maible)\nNett(candi, maible)\nRobustious(jeanna)\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> Verbify(x, maible))\nNett(candi, corry) -> Verbify(corry, jeanna)\nforall x (Verbify(x, maible) -> not Cavort(x, candi))\nforall x (Verbify(x, maible) -> Cavort(maible, corry))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and Dirt(x) -> not Nett(x, candi))\nLicenced(candi) and Nett(candi, corry) -> not Mendacious(candi)\n\nnot Verbify(jeanna, maible)\n\nRobustious(jeanna) and forall x (Robustious(x) -> Verbify(x, maible)) -> therefore Verbify(jeanna, maible)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The abdel checkmate the deb. The deb is provencal. The roz flutter the deb. The devinne is glib. If something is glib then it agonize the deb. If the roz flutter the abdel then the abdel agonize the devinne. If something agonize the deb then it does not visit the roz. If something agonize the deb then the deb checkmate the abdel. If something is glib and lopsided then it does not like the roz. If the roz is provencal and the roz flutter the abdel then the roz is not familiar. The devinne does not visit the roz.", "logic": "\nCheckmate(abdel, deb)\nProvencal(deb)\nFlutter(roz, deb)\nGlib(devinne)\nforall x (Glib(x) -> Agonize(x, deb))\nFlutter(roz, abdel) -> Agonize(abdel, devinne)\nforall x (Agonize(x, deb) -> not Checkmate(x, roz))\nforall x (Agonize(x, deb) -> Checkmate(deb, abdel))\nforall x (Glib(x) and Lopsided(x) -> not Flutter(x, roz))\nProvencal(roz) and Flutter(roz, abdel) -> not Familiar(roz)\n\nnot Checkmate(devinne, roz)\n\nGlib(devinne) and forall x (Glib(x) -> Agonize(x, deb)) -> therefore Agonize(devinne, deb) Agonize(devinne, deb) and forall x (Agonize(x, deb) -> not Checkmate(x, roz)) -> therefore not Checkmate(devinne, roz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The sheelagh census the andree. The andree is battleful. The cristie amuse the andree. The breanne is acervate. If something is acervate then it motorise the andree. If the cristie amuse the sheelagh then the sheelagh motorise the breanne. If something motorise the andree then it does not visit the cristie. If something motorise the andree then the andree census the sheelagh. If something is acervate and striped then it does not like the cristie. If the cristie is battleful and the cristie amuse the sheelagh then the cristie is not near. The breanne census the cristie.", "logic": "\nCensus(sheelagh, andree)\nBattleful(andree)\nAmuse(cristie, andree)\nAcervate(breanne)\nforall x (Acervate(x) -> Motorise(x, andree))\nAmuse(cristie, sheelagh) -> Motorise(sheelagh, breanne)\nforall x (Motorise(x, andree) -> not Census(x, cristie))\nforall x (Motorise(x, andree) -> Census(andree, sheelagh))\nforall x (Acervate(x) and Striped(x) -> not Amuse(x, cristie))\nBattleful(cristie) and Amuse(cristie, sheelagh) -> not Near(cristie)\n\nCensus(breanne, cristie)\n\nAcervate(breanne) and forall x (Acervate(x) -> Motorise(x, andree)) -> therefore Motorise(breanne, andree) Motorise(breanne, andree) and forall x (Motorise(x, andree) -> not Census(x, cristie)) -> therefore not Census(breanne, cristie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The omar ferret the gabriello. The gabriello is triassic. The blinny unhorse the gabriello. The carson is rotund. If something is rotund then it gazump the gabriello. If the blinny unhorse the omar then the omar gazump the carson. If something gazump the gabriello then it does not visit the blinny. If something gazump the gabriello then the gabriello ferret the omar. If something is rotund and tamable then it does not like the blinny. If the blinny is triassic and the blinny unhorse the omar then the blinny is not disklike. The blinny does not see the gabriello.", "logic": "\nFerret(omar, gabriello)\nTriassic(gabriello)\nUnhorse(blinny, gabriello)\nRotund(carson)\nforall x (Rotund(x) -> Gazump(x, gabriello))\nUnhorse(blinny, omar) -> Gazump(omar, carson)\nforall x (Gazump(x, gabriello) -> not Ferret(x, blinny))\nforall x (Gazump(x, gabriello) -> Ferret(gabriello, omar))\nforall x (Rotund(x) and Tamable(x) -> not Unhorse(x, blinny))\nTriassic(blinny) and Unhorse(blinny, omar) -> not Disklike(blinny)\n\nnot Gazump(blinny, gabriello)\n\nforall x (Rotund(x) -> Gazump(x, gabriello)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The marna mythicize the darell. The darell is wailing. The teriann initialize the darell. The kari is fluvial. If something is fluvial then it exasperate the darell. If the teriann initialize the marna then the marna exasperate the kari. If something exasperate the darell then it does not visit the teriann. If something exasperate the darell then the darell mythicize the marna. If something is fluvial and cosmogonic then it does not like the teriann. If the teriann is wailing and the teriann initialize the marna then the teriann is not ventilated. The darell exasperate the darell.", "logic": "\nMythicize(marna, darell)\nWailing(darell)\nInitialize(teriann, darell)\nFluvial(kari)\nforall x (Fluvial(x) -> Exasperate(x, darell))\nInitialize(teriann, marna) -> Exasperate(marna, kari)\nforall x (Exasperate(x, darell) -> not Mythicize(x, teriann))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, darell) -> Mythicize(darell, marna))\nforall x (Fluvial(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> not Initialize(x, teriann))\nWailing(teriann) and Initialize(teriann, marna) -> not Ventilated(teriann)\n\nExasperate(darell, darell)\n\nforall x (Fluvial(x) -> Exasperate(x, darell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The harmony intonate the pate. The pate is roiling. The olin green the pate. The faye is lapidarian. If something is lapidarian then it locate the pate. If the olin green the harmony then the harmony locate the faye. If something locate the pate then it does not visit the olin. If something locate the pate then the pate intonate the harmony. If something is lapidarian and capitulary then it does not like the olin. If the olin is roiling and the olin green the harmony then the olin is not dignifying. The harmony does not see the faye.", "logic": "\nIntonate(harmony, pate)\nRoiling(pate)\nGreen(olin, pate)\nLapidarian(faye)\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) -> Locate(x, pate))\nGreen(olin, harmony) -> Locate(harmony, faye)\nforall x (Locate(x, pate) -> not Intonate(x, olin))\nforall x (Locate(x, pate) -> Intonate(pate, harmony))\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) and Capitulary(x) -> not Green(x, olin))\nRoiling(olin) and Green(olin, harmony) -> not Dignifying(olin)\n\nnot Locate(harmony, faye)\n\nGreen(olin, harmony) -> Locate(harmony, faye) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The noach harass the harmony. The harmony is sonsy. The ivy reside the harmony. The hagen is earthlike. If something is earthlike then it sexualize the harmony. If the ivy reside the noach then the noach sexualize the hagen. If something sexualize the harmony then it does not visit the ivy. If something sexualize the harmony then the harmony harass the noach. If something is earthlike and receivable then it does not like the ivy. If the ivy is sonsy and the ivy reside the noach then the ivy is not viricidal. The noach harass the noach.", "logic": "\nHarass(noach, harmony)\nSonsy(harmony)\nReside(ivy, harmony)\nEarthlike(hagen)\nforall x (Earthlike(x) -> Sexualize(x, harmony))\nReside(ivy, noach) -> Sexualize(noach, hagen)\nforall x (Sexualize(x, harmony) -> not Harass(x, ivy))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, harmony) -> Harass(harmony, noach))\nforall x (Earthlike(x) and Receivable(x) -> not Reside(x, ivy))\nSonsy(ivy) and Reside(ivy, noach) -> not Viricidal(ivy)\n\nHarass(noach, noach)\n\nHarass(noach, noach) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The florri silkscreen the lesly. The lesly is apparent. The joannes fluff the lesly. The vicki is daredevil. If something is daredevil then it host the lesly. If the joannes fluff the florri then the florri host the vicki. If something host the lesly then it does not visit the joannes. If something host the lesly then the lesly silkscreen the florri. If something is daredevil and alight then it does not like the joannes. If the joannes is apparent and the joannes fluff the florri then the joannes is not appalling. The florri is not appalling.", "logic": "\nSilkscreen(florri, lesly)\nApparent(lesly)\nFluff(joannes, lesly)\nDaredevil(vicki)\nforall x (Daredevil(x) -> Host(x, lesly))\nFluff(joannes, florri) -> Host(florri, vicki)\nforall x (Host(x, lesly) -> not Silkscreen(x, joannes))\nforall x (Host(x, lesly) -> Silkscreen(lesly, florri))\nforall x (Daredevil(x) and Alight(x) -> not Fluff(x, joannes))\nApparent(joannes) and Fluff(joannes, florri) -> not Appalling(joannes)\n\nnot Appalling(florri)\n\nnot Appalling(florri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "The happy notify the lona. The lona is grotesque. The iggy comprise the lona. The clancy is upcurved. If something is upcurved then it hibernate the lona. If the iggy comprise the happy then the happy hibernate the clancy. If something hibernate the lona then it does not visit the iggy. If something hibernate the lona then the lona notify the happy. If something is upcurved and emollient then it does not like the iggy. If the iggy is grotesque and the iggy comprise the happy then the iggy is not achievable. The iggy hibernate the iggy.", "logic": "\nNotify(happy, lona)\nGrotesque(lona)\nComprise(iggy, lona)\nUpcurved(clancy)\nforall x (Upcurved(x) -> Hibernate(x, lona))\nComprise(iggy, happy) -> Hibernate(happy, clancy)\nforall x (Hibernate(x, lona) -> not Notify(x, iggy))\nforall x (Hibernate(x, lona) -> Notify(lona, happy))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Emollient(x) -> not Comprise(x, iggy))\nGrotesque(iggy) and Comprise(iggy, happy) -> not Achievable(iggy)\n\nHibernate(iggy, iggy)\n\nHibernate(iggy, iggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1244"} {"premises": "Rubetta is bipedal. Rubetta is cochlear. Rubetta is momentous. Rubetta is not sapiens. Leontyne is bipedal. Leontyne is momentous. Leontyne is sapiens. Leontyne is enticing. Leontyne is flowing. Leontyne is not fitted. All fitted, bipedal people are enticing. All bipedal, cochlear people are fitted. If Leontyne is not fitted then Leontyne is enticing. If someone is bipedal and not enticing then they are not momentous. If someone is sapiens and not enticing then they are momentous. If someone is fitted and momentous then they are not flowing. Leontyne is not fitted.", "logic": "\nBipedal(rubetta)\nCochlear(rubetta)\nMomentous(rubetta)\nnot Sapiens(rubetta)\nBipedal(leontyne)\nMomentous(leontyne)\nSapiens(leontyne)\nEnticing(leontyne)\nFlowing(leontyne)\nnot Fitted(leontyne)\nforall x (Fitted(x) and Bipedal(x) -> Enticing(x))\nforall x (Bipedal(x) and Cochlear(x) -> Fitted(x))\nnot Fitted(leontyne) -> Enticing(leontyne)\nforall x (Bipedal(x) and not Enticing(x) -> not Momentous(x))\nforall x (Sapiens(x) and not Enticing(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) and Momentous(x) -> not Flowing(x))\n\nnot Fitted(leontyne)\n\ntherefore not Fitted(leontyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Virgil is buffoonish. Virgil is porticoed. Virgil is bounderish. Virgil is not squinting. Ardelis is buffoonish. Ardelis is bounderish. Ardelis is squinting. Ardelis is westbound. Ardelis is chartless. Ardelis is not faceted. All faceted, buffoonish people are westbound. All buffoonish, porticoed people are faceted. If Ardelis is not faceted then Ardelis is westbound. If someone is buffoonish and not westbound then they are not bounderish. If someone is squinting and not westbound then they are bounderish. If someone is faceted and bounderish then they are not chartless. Ardelis is not squinting.", "logic": "\nBuffoonish(virgil)\nPorticoed(virgil)\nBounderish(virgil)\nnot Squinting(virgil)\nBuffoonish(ardelis)\nBounderish(ardelis)\nSquinting(ardelis)\nWestbound(ardelis)\nChartless(ardelis)\nnot Faceted(ardelis)\nforall x (Faceted(x) and Buffoonish(x) -> Westbound(x))\nforall x (Buffoonish(x) and Porticoed(x) -> Faceted(x))\nnot Faceted(ardelis) -> Westbound(ardelis)\nforall x (Buffoonish(x) and not Westbound(x) -> not Bounderish(x))\nforall x (Squinting(x) and not Westbound(x) -> Bounderish(x))\nforall x (Faceted(x) and Bounderish(x) -> not Chartless(x))\n\nnot Squinting(ardelis)\n\ntherefore Squinting(ardelis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Rhianna is formidable. Rhianna is monovular. Rhianna is septate. Rhianna is not parallel. Danika is formidable. Danika is septate. Danika is parallel. Danika is hilarious. Danika is vaporized. Danika is not veterinary. All veterinary, formidable people are hilarious. All formidable, monovular people are veterinary. If Danika is not veterinary then Danika is hilarious. If someone is formidable and not hilarious then they are not septate. If someone is parallel and not hilarious then they are septate. If someone is veterinary and septate then they are not vaporized. Rhianna is veterinary.", "logic": "\nFormidable(rhianna)\nMonovular(rhianna)\nSeptate(rhianna)\nnot Parallel(rhianna)\nFormidable(danika)\nSeptate(danika)\nParallel(danika)\nHilarious(danika)\nVaporized(danika)\nnot Veterinary(danika)\nforall x (Veterinary(x) and Formidable(x) -> Hilarious(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and Monovular(x) -> Veterinary(x))\nnot Veterinary(danika) -> Hilarious(danika)\nforall x (Formidable(x) and not Hilarious(x) -> not Septate(x))\nforall x (Parallel(x) and not Hilarious(x) -> Septate(x))\nforall x (Veterinary(x) and Septate(x) -> not Vaporized(x))\n\nVeterinary(rhianna)\n\nFormidable(rhianna) and Monovular(rhianna) and forall x (Formidable(x) and Monovular(x) -> Veterinary(x)) -> therefore Veterinary(rhianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Ardyce is coarse. Ardyce is erythroid. Ardyce is scholastic. Ardyce is not invidious. Rori is coarse. Rori is scholastic. Rori is invidious. Rori is spermatic. Rori is dioecian. Rori is not liberian. All liberian, coarse people are spermatic. All coarse, erythroid people are liberian. If Rori is not liberian then Rori is spermatic. If someone is coarse and not spermatic then they are not scholastic. If someone is invidious and not spermatic then they are scholastic. If someone is liberian and scholastic then they are not dioecian. Ardyce is not liberian.", "logic": "\nCoarse(ardyce)\nErythroid(ardyce)\nScholastic(ardyce)\nnot Invidious(ardyce)\nCoarse(rori)\nScholastic(rori)\nInvidious(rori)\nSpermatic(rori)\nDioecian(rori)\nnot Liberian(rori)\nforall x (Liberian(x) and Coarse(x) -> Spermatic(x))\nforall x (Coarse(x) and Erythroid(x) -> Liberian(x))\nnot Liberian(rori) -> Spermatic(rori)\nforall x (Coarse(x) and not Spermatic(x) -> not Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) and not Spermatic(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Liberian(x) and Scholastic(x) -> not Dioecian(x))\n\nnot Liberian(ardyce)\n\nCoarse(ardyce) and Erythroid(ardyce) and forall x (Coarse(x) and Erythroid(x) -> Liberian(x)) -> therefore Liberian(ardyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Mickie is bodacious. Mickie is fearless. Mickie is provable. Mickie is not suckled. Fortune is bodacious. Fortune is provable. Fortune is suckled. Fortune is showy. Fortune is dyspneal. Fortune is not fiftieth. All fiftieth, bodacious people are showy. All bodacious, fearless people are fiftieth. If Fortune is not fiftieth then Fortune is showy. If someone is bodacious and not showy then they are not provable. If someone is suckled and not showy then they are provable. If someone is fiftieth and provable then they are not dyspneal. Mickie is not dyspneal.", "logic": "\nBodacious(mickie)\nFearless(mickie)\nProvable(mickie)\nnot Suckled(mickie)\nBodacious(fortune)\nProvable(fortune)\nSuckled(fortune)\nShowy(fortune)\nDyspneal(fortune)\nnot Fiftieth(fortune)\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) and Bodacious(x) -> Showy(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and Fearless(x) -> Fiftieth(x))\nnot Fiftieth(fortune) -> Showy(fortune)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and not Showy(x) -> not Provable(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) and not Showy(x) -> Provable(x))\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) and Provable(x) -> not Dyspneal(x))\n\nnot Dyspneal(mickie)\n\nBodacious(mickie) and Fearless(mickie) and forall x (Bodacious(x) and Fearless(x) -> Fiftieth(x)) -> therefore Fiftieth(mickie) Fiftieth(mickie) and Provable(mickie) and forall x (Fiftieth(x) and Provable(x) -> not Dyspneal(x)) -> therefore not Dyspneal(mickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Che is accessible. Che is back. Che is mouselike. Che is not sedulous. Georgy is accessible. Georgy is mouselike. Georgy is sedulous. Georgy is parietal. Georgy is apodal. Georgy is not nefarious. All nefarious, accessible people are parietal. All accessible, back people are nefarious. If Georgy is not nefarious then Georgy is parietal. If someone is accessible and not parietal then they are not mouselike. If someone is sedulous and not parietal then they are mouselike. If someone is nefarious and mouselike then they are not apodal. Che is apodal.", "logic": "\nAccessible(che)\nBack(che)\nMouselike(che)\nnot Sedulous(che)\nAccessible(georgy)\nMouselike(georgy)\nSedulous(georgy)\nParietal(georgy)\nApodal(georgy)\nnot Nefarious(georgy)\nforall x (Nefarious(x) and Accessible(x) -> Parietal(x))\nforall x (Accessible(x) and Back(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nnot Nefarious(georgy) -> Parietal(georgy)\nforall x (Accessible(x) and not Parietal(x) -> not Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) and not Parietal(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Nefarious(x) and Mouselike(x) -> not Apodal(x))\n\nApodal(che)\n\nAccessible(che) and Back(che) and forall x (Accessible(x) and Back(x) -> Nefarious(x)) -> therefore Nefarious(che) Nefarious(che) and Mouselike(che) and forall x (Nefarious(x) and Mouselike(x) -> not Apodal(x)) -> therefore not Apodal(che)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Nesta is not canty. Nesta is degrading. Nesta is not erroneous. If something is medial then it is teachable. If Nesta is degrading and Nesta is not erroneous then Nesta is medial. Nesta is degrading.", "logic": "\nnot Canty(nesta)\nDegrading(nesta)\nnot Erroneous(nesta)\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Teachable(x))\nDegrading(nesta) and not Erroneous(nesta) -> Medial(nesta)\n\nDegrading(nesta)\n\ntherefore Degrading(nesta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "Teryl is not pettish. Teryl is amoeban. Teryl is not stingy. If something is downtown then it is micropylar. If Teryl is amoeban and Teryl is not stingy then Teryl is downtown. Teryl is not amoeban.", "logic": "\nnot Pettish(teryl)\nAmoeban(teryl)\nnot Stingy(teryl)\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Micropylar(x))\nAmoeban(teryl) and not Stingy(teryl) -> Downtown(teryl)\n\nnot Amoeban(teryl)\n\ntherefore Amoeban(teryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "Orrin is not beady. Orrin is flavorsome. Orrin is not soughing. If something is grainy then it is assured. If Orrin is flavorsome and Orrin is not soughing then Orrin is grainy. Orrin is grainy.", "logic": "\nnot Beady(orrin)\nFlavorsome(orrin)\nnot Soughing(orrin)\nforall x (Grainy(x) -> Assured(x))\nFlavorsome(orrin) and not Soughing(orrin) -> Grainy(orrin)\n\nGrainy(orrin)\n\nFlavorsome(orrin) and not Soughing(orrin) and Flavorsome(orrin) and not Soughing(orrin) -> Grainy(orrin) -> therefore Grainy(orrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "Faith is not planless. Faith is weeklong. Faith is not knifelike. If something is honduran then it is dilettante. If Faith is weeklong and Faith is not knifelike then Faith is honduran. Faith is not honduran.", "logic": "\nnot Planless(faith)\nWeeklong(faith)\nnot Knifelike(faith)\nforall x (Honduran(x) -> Dilettante(x))\nWeeklong(faith) and not Knifelike(faith) -> Honduran(faith)\n\nnot Honduran(faith)\n\nWeeklong(faith) and not Knifelike(faith) and Weeklong(faith) and not Knifelike(faith) -> Honduran(faith) -> therefore Honduran(faith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "Kaia is not korean. Kaia is undamaged. Kaia is not adamant. If something is scapular then it is blasting. If Kaia is undamaged and Kaia is not adamant then Kaia is scapular. Kaia is blasting.", "logic": "\nnot Korean(kaia)\nUndamaged(kaia)\nnot Adamant(kaia)\nforall x (Scapular(x) -> Blasting(x))\nUndamaged(kaia) and not Adamant(kaia) -> Scapular(kaia)\n\nBlasting(kaia)\n\nUndamaged(kaia) and not Adamant(kaia) and Undamaged(kaia) and not Adamant(kaia) -> Scapular(kaia) -> therefore Scapular(kaia) Scapular(kaia) and forall x (Scapular(x) -> Blasting(x)) -> therefore Blasting(kaia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "Talia is not fraught. Talia is mimetic. Talia is not inartistic. If something is bigheaded then it is seafaring. If Talia is mimetic and Talia is not inartistic then Talia is bigheaded. Talia is not seafaring.", "logic": "\nnot Fraught(talia)\nMimetic(talia)\nnot Inartistic(talia)\nforall x (Bigheaded(x) -> Seafaring(x))\nMimetic(talia) and not Inartistic(talia) -> Bigheaded(talia)\n\nnot Seafaring(talia)\n\nMimetic(talia) and not Inartistic(talia) and Mimetic(talia) and not Inartistic(talia) -> Bigheaded(talia) -> therefore Bigheaded(talia) Bigheaded(talia) and forall x (Bigheaded(x) -> Seafaring(x)) -> therefore Seafaring(talia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "Fayre is not capsular. Fayre is adjustive. Fayre is not secretive. If something is hatless then it is aural. If Fayre is adjustive and Fayre is not secretive then Fayre is hatless. Fayre is not rough.", "logic": "\nnot Capsular(fayre)\nAdjustive(fayre)\nnot Secretive(fayre)\nforall x (Hatless(x) -> Aural(x))\nAdjustive(fayre) and not Secretive(fayre) -> Hatless(fayre)\n\nnot Rough(fayre)\n\nnot Rough(fayre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "Helena is not snaky. Helena is canescent. Helena is not iambic. If something is unlighted then it is semestral. If Helena is canescent and Helena is not iambic then Helena is unlighted. Helena is green.", "logic": "\nnot Snaky(helena)\nCanescent(helena)\nnot Iambic(helena)\nforall x (Unlighted(x) -> Semestral(x))\nCanescent(helena) and not Iambic(helena) -> Unlighted(helena)\n\nGreen(helena)\n\nGreen(helena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-897"} {"premises": "The ella is wiggly. The ella is dished. The ella is plentiful. The ella is tripping. The ella is tanned. The ella chronicle the randy. The ella languish the randy. The ella savour the randy. The randy is wiggly. The randy is dished. The randy is plentiful. The randy is tripping. The randy is tanned. The randy chronicle the ella. The randy languish the ella. The randy savour the ella. If something is dished then it savour the ella. If something languish the ella and it chronicle the randy then the randy is dished. If something savour the ella and it chronicle the randy then it languish the ella. The randy is dished.", "logic": "\nWiggly(ella)\nDished(ella)\nPlentiful(ella)\nTripping(ella)\nTanned(ella)\nChronicle(ella, randy)\nLanguish(ella, randy)\nSavour(ella, randy)\nWiggly(randy)\nDished(randy)\nPlentiful(randy)\nTripping(randy)\nTanned(randy)\nChronicle(randy, ella)\nLanguish(randy, ella)\nSavour(randy, ella)\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Savour(x, ella))\nforall x (Languish(x, ella) and Chronicle(x, randy) -> Dished(randy))\nforall x (Savour(x, ella) and Chronicle(x, randy) -> Languish(x, ella))\n\nDished(randy)\n\ntherefore Dished(randy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The weylin is coinciding. The weylin is sown. The weylin is floating. The weylin is arborous. The weylin is frowzled. The weylin robe the harrold. The weylin lodge the harrold. The weylin delimitate the harrold. The harrold is coinciding. The harrold is sown. The harrold is floating. The harrold is arborous. The harrold is frowzled. The harrold robe the weylin. The harrold lodge the weylin. The harrold delimitate the weylin. If something is sown then it delimitate the weylin. If something lodge the weylin and it robe the harrold then the harrold is sown. If something delimitate the weylin and it robe the harrold then it lodge the weylin. The harrold does not like the weylin.", "logic": "\nCoinciding(weylin)\nSown(weylin)\nFloating(weylin)\nArborous(weylin)\nFrowzled(weylin)\nRobe(weylin, harrold)\nLodge(weylin, harrold)\nDelimitate(weylin, harrold)\nCoinciding(harrold)\nSown(harrold)\nFloating(harrold)\nArborous(harrold)\nFrowzled(harrold)\nRobe(harrold, weylin)\nLodge(harrold, weylin)\nDelimitate(harrold, weylin)\nforall x (Sown(x) -> Delimitate(x, weylin))\nforall x (Lodge(x, weylin) and Robe(x, harrold) -> Sown(harrold))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, weylin) and Robe(x, harrold) -> Lodge(x, weylin))\n\nnot Robe(harrold, weylin)\n\ntherefore Robe(harrold, weylin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The aime is sidearm. The aime is ceruminous. The aime is amebic. The aime is micro. The aime is shaven. The aime lend the karisa. The aime forget the karisa. The aime slope the karisa. The karisa is sidearm. The karisa is ceruminous. The karisa is amebic. The karisa is micro. The karisa is shaven. The karisa lend the aime. The karisa forget the aime. The karisa slope the aime. If something is ceruminous then it slope the aime. If something forget the aime and it lend the karisa then the karisa is ceruminous. If something slope the aime and it lend the karisa then it forget the aime. The aime slope the aime.", "logic": "\nSidearm(aime)\nCeruminous(aime)\nAmebic(aime)\nMicro(aime)\nShaven(aime)\nLend(aime, karisa)\nForget(aime, karisa)\nSlope(aime, karisa)\nSidearm(karisa)\nCeruminous(karisa)\nAmebic(karisa)\nMicro(karisa)\nShaven(karisa)\nLend(karisa, aime)\nForget(karisa, aime)\nSlope(karisa, aime)\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Slope(x, aime))\nforall x (Forget(x, aime) and Lend(x, karisa) -> Ceruminous(karisa))\nforall x (Slope(x, aime) and Lend(x, karisa) -> Forget(x, aime))\n\nSlope(aime, aime)\n\nCeruminous(aime) and forall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Slope(x, aime)) -> therefore Slope(aime, aime)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The caroleen is emasculate. The caroleen is nubile. The caroleen is unimodal. The caroleen is sorrowful. The caroleen is hyaline. The caroleen recoil the gina. The caroleen displume the gina. The caroleen draft the gina. The gina is emasculate. The gina is nubile. The gina is unimodal. The gina is sorrowful. The gina is hyaline. The gina recoil the caroleen. The gina displume the caroleen. The gina draft the caroleen. If something is nubile then it draft the caroleen. If something displume the caroleen and it recoil the gina then the gina is nubile. If something draft the caroleen and it recoil the gina then it displume the caroleen. The caroleen does not visit the caroleen.", "logic": "\nEmasculate(caroleen)\nNubile(caroleen)\nUnimodal(caroleen)\nSorrowful(caroleen)\nHyaline(caroleen)\nRecoil(caroleen, gina)\nDisplume(caroleen, gina)\nDraft(caroleen, gina)\nEmasculate(gina)\nNubile(gina)\nUnimodal(gina)\nSorrowful(gina)\nHyaline(gina)\nRecoil(gina, caroleen)\nDisplume(gina, caroleen)\nDraft(gina, caroleen)\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Draft(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Displume(x, caroleen) and Recoil(x, gina) -> Nubile(gina))\nforall x (Draft(x, caroleen) and Recoil(x, gina) -> Displume(x, caroleen))\n\nnot Draft(caroleen, caroleen)\n\nNubile(caroleen) and forall x (Nubile(x) -> Draft(x, caroleen)) -> therefore Draft(caroleen, caroleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The maiga is juicy. The maiga is credulous. The maiga is lowbrow. The maiga is orwellian. The maiga is tawny. The maiga scurry the amory. The maiga weaponize the amory. The maiga joint the amory. The amory is juicy. The amory is credulous. The amory is lowbrow. The amory is orwellian. The amory is tawny. The amory scurry the maiga. The amory weaponize the maiga. The amory joint the maiga. If something is credulous then it joint the maiga. If something weaponize the maiga and it scurry the amory then the amory is credulous. If something joint the maiga and it scurry the amory then it weaponize the maiga. The maiga weaponize the maiga.", "logic": "\nJuicy(maiga)\nCredulous(maiga)\nLowbrow(maiga)\nOrwellian(maiga)\nTawny(maiga)\nScurry(maiga, amory)\nWeaponize(maiga, amory)\nJoint(maiga, amory)\nJuicy(amory)\nCredulous(amory)\nLowbrow(amory)\nOrwellian(amory)\nTawny(amory)\nScurry(amory, maiga)\nWeaponize(amory, maiga)\nJoint(amory, maiga)\nforall x (Credulous(x) -> Joint(x, maiga))\nforall x (Weaponize(x, maiga) and Scurry(x, amory) -> Credulous(amory))\nforall x (Joint(x, maiga) and Scurry(x, amory) -> Weaponize(x, maiga))\n\nWeaponize(maiga, maiga)\n\nCredulous(maiga) and forall x (Credulous(x) -> Joint(x, maiga)) -> therefore Joint(maiga, maiga) Joint(maiga, maiga) and Scurry(maiga, amory) and forall x (Joint(x, maiga) and Scurry(x, amory) -> Weaponize(x, maiga)) -> therefore Weaponize(maiga, maiga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The wenda is subsidiary. The wenda is chapped. The wenda is horned. The wenda is bibliotic. The wenda is damned. The wenda beckon the moselle. The wenda aquaplane the moselle. The wenda junk the moselle. The moselle is subsidiary. The moselle is chapped. The moselle is horned. The moselle is bibliotic. The moselle is damned. The moselle beckon the wenda. The moselle aquaplane the wenda. The moselle junk the wenda. If something is chapped then it junk the wenda. If something aquaplane the wenda and it beckon the moselle then the moselle is chapped. If something junk the wenda and it beckon the moselle then it aquaplane the wenda. The wenda does not see the wenda.", "logic": "\nSubsidiary(wenda)\nChapped(wenda)\nHorned(wenda)\nBibliotic(wenda)\nDamned(wenda)\nBeckon(wenda, moselle)\nAquaplane(wenda, moselle)\nJunk(wenda, moselle)\nSubsidiary(moselle)\nChapped(moselle)\nHorned(moselle)\nBibliotic(moselle)\nDamned(moselle)\nBeckon(moselle, wenda)\nAquaplane(moselle, wenda)\nJunk(moselle, wenda)\nforall x (Chapped(x) -> Junk(x, wenda))\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, wenda) and Beckon(x, moselle) -> Chapped(moselle))\nforall x (Junk(x, wenda) and Beckon(x, moselle) -> Aquaplane(x, wenda))\n\nnot Aquaplane(wenda, wenda)\n\nChapped(wenda) and forall x (Chapped(x) -> Junk(x, wenda)) -> therefore Junk(wenda, wenda) Junk(wenda, wenda) and Beckon(wenda, moselle) and forall x (Junk(x, wenda) and Beckon(x, moselle) -> Aquaplane(x, wenda)) -> therefore Aquaplane(wenda, wenda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The britney is scrub. The britney is myotonic. The britney is thinkable. The britney is dividable. The britney is unequipped. The britney raid the richmond. The britney ensky the richmond. The britney capsule the richmond. The richmond is scrub. The richmond is myotonic. The richmond is thinkable. The richmond is dividable. The richmond is unequipped. The richmond raid the britney. The richmond ensky the britney. The richmond capsule the britney. If something is myotonic then it capsule the britney. If something ensky the britney and it raid the richmond then the richmond is myotonic. If something capsule the britney and it raid the richmond then it ensky the britney. The britney does not like the britney.", "logic": "\nScrub(britney)\nMyotonic(britney)\nThinkable(britney)\nDividable(britney)\nUnequipped(britney)\nRaid(britney, richmond)\nEnsky(britney, richmond)\nCapsule(britney, richmond)\nScrub(richmond)\nMyotonic(richmond)\nThinkable(richmond)\nDividable(richmond)\nUnequipped(richmond)\nRaid(richmond, britney)\nEnsky(richmond, britney)\nCapsule(richmond, britney)\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Capsule(x, britney))\nforall x (Ensky(x, britney) and Raid(x, richmond) -> Myotonic(richmond))\nforall x (Capsule(x, britney) and Raid(x, richmond) -> Ensky(x, britney))\n\nnot Raid(britney, britney)\n\nnot Raid(britney, britney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The shelden is irate. The shelden is glued. The shelden is relaxing. The shelden is hitlerian. The shelden is tallish. The shelden overheat the davide. The shelden format the davide. The shelden adjoin the davide. The davide is irate. The davide is glued. The davide is relaxing. The davide is hitlerian. The davide is tallish. The davide overheat the shelden. The davide format the shelden. The davide adjoin the shelden. If something is glued then it adjoin the shelden. If something format the shelden and it overheat the davide then the davide is glued. If something adjoin the shelden and it overheat the davide then it format the shelden. The davide adjoin the davide.", "logic": "\nIrate(shelden)\nGlued(shelden)\nRelaxing(shelden)\nHitlerian(shelden)\nTallish(shelden)\nOverheat(shelden, davide)\nFormat(shelden, davide)\nAdjoin(shelden, davide)\nIrate(davide)\nGlued(davide)\nRelaxing(davide)\nHitlerian(davide)\nTallish(davide)\nOverheat(davide, shelden)\nFormat(davide, shelden)\nAdjoin(davide, shelden)\nforall x (Glued(x) -> Adjoin(x, shelden))\nforall x (Format(x, shelden) and Overheat(x, davide) -> Glued(davide))\nforall x (Adjoin(x, shelden) and Overheat(x, davide) -> Format(x, shelden))\n\nAdjoin(davide, davide)\n\nAdjoin(davide, davide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The viv is hagridden. The viv is unexcelled. The viv is capricious. The viv is raftered. The viv is monophonic. The viv torch the dudley. The viv spot the dudley. The viv bedraggle the dudley. The dudley is hagridden. The dudley is unexcelled. The dudley is capricious. The dudley is raftered. The dudley is monophonic. The dudley torch the viv. The dudley spot the viv. The dudley bedraggle the viv. If something is unexcelled then it bedraggle the viv. If something spot the viv and it torch the dudley then the dudley is unexcelled. If something bedraggle the viv and it torch the dudley then it spot the viv. The dudley does not see the dudley.", "logic": "\nHagridden(viv)\nUnexcelled(viv)\nCapricious(viv)\nRaftered(viv)\nMonophonic(viv)\nTorch(viv, dudley)\nSpot(viv, dudley)\nBedraggle(viv, dudley)\nHagridden(dudley)\nUnexcelled(dudley)\nCapricious(dudley)\nRaftered(dudley)\nMonophonic(dudley)\nTorch(dudley, viv)\nSpot(dudley, viv)\nBedraggle(dudley, viv)\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Bedraggle(x, viv))\nforall x (Spot(x, viv) and Torch(x, dudley) -> Unexcelled(dudley))\nforall x (Bedraggle(x, viv) and Torch(x, dudley) -> Spot(x, viv))\n\nnot Spot(dudley, dudley)\n\nnot Spot(dudley, dudley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The thorsten is topping. The thorsten is pedate. The thorsten is aeronautic. The thorsten is artesian. The thorsten is moneyed. The thorsten scuffle the ben. The thorsten backbite the ben. The thorsten increase the ben. The ben is topping. The ben is pedate. The ben is aeronautic. The ben is artesian. The ben is moneyed. The ben scuffle the thorsten. The ben backbite the thorsten. The ben increase the thorsten. If something is pedate then it increase the thorsten. If something backbite the thorsten and it scuffle the ben then the ben is pedate. If something increase the thorsten and it scuffle the ben then it backbite the thorsten. The ben scuffle the ben.", "logic": "\nTopping(thorsten)\nPedate(thorsten)\nAeronautic(thorsten)\nArtesian(thorsten)\nMoneyed(thorsten)\nScuffle(thorsten, ben)\nBackbite(thorsten, ben)\nIncrease(thorsten, ben)\nTopping(ben)\nPedate(ben)\nAeronautic(ben)\nArtesian(ben)\nMoneyed(ben)\nScuffle(ben, thorsten)\nBackbite(ben, thorsten)\nIncrease(ben, thorsten)\nforall x (Pedate(x) -> Increase(x, thorsten))\nforall x (Backbite(x, thorsten) and Scuffle(x, ben) -> Pedate(ben))\nforall x (Increase(x, thorsten) and Scuffle(x, ben) -> Backbite(x, thorsten))\n\nScuffle(ben, ben)\n\nScuffle(ben, ben) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1781"} {"premises": "The jania is gutless. The jania is talkative. The jania degenerate the giles. The jania corbel the giles. The giles barde the jania. The giles barde the judie. The giles is inglorious. The giles is gutless. The giles degenerate the judie. The giles corbel the jania. The judie is inglorious. The judie is talkative. The judie is perishable. The judie degenerate the giles. The judie corbel the jania. The judie corbel the giles. If something is gutless and perishable then it barde the jania. If something corbel the jania and the jania degenerate the giles then the jania is perishable. If something barde the judie then the judie barde the giles. The judie is talkative.", "logic": "\nGutless(jania)\nTalkative(jania)\nDegenerate(jania, giles)\nCorbel(jania, giles)\nBarde(giles, jania)\nBarde(giles, judie)\nInglorious(giles)\nGutless(giles)\nDegenerate(giles, judie)\nCorbel(giles, jania)\nInglorious(judie)\nTalkative(judie)\nPerishable(judie)\nDegenerate(judie, giles)\nCorbel(judie, jania)\nCorbel(judie, giles)\nforall x (Gutless(x) and Perishable(x) -> Barde(x, jania))\nforall x (Corbel(x, jania) and Degenerate(jania, giles) -> Perishable(jania))\nforall x (Barde(x, judie) -> Barde(judie, giles))\n\nTalkative(judie)\n\ntherefore Talkative(judie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The jakob is prosy. The jakob is screwball. The jakob bestrew the merle. The jakob vindicate the merle. The merle promote the jakob. The merle promote the nicholle. The merle is quadrate. The merle is prosy. The merle bestrew the nicholle. The merle vindicate the jakob. The nicholle is quadrate. The nicholle is screwball. The nicholle is swordlike. The nicholle bestrew the merle. The nicholle vindicate the jakob. The nicholle vindicate the merle. If something is prosy and swordlike then it promote the jakob. If something vindicate the jakob and the jakob bestrew the merle then the jakob is swordlike. If something promote the nicholle then the nicholle promote the merle. The nicholle is not swordlike.", "logic": "\nProsy(jakob)\nScrewball(jakob)\nBestrew(jakob, merle)\nVindicate(jakob, merle)\nPromote(merle, jakob)\nPromote(merle, nicholle)\nQuadrate(merle)\nProsy(merle)\nBestrew(merle, nicholle)\nVindicate(merle, jakob)\nQuadrate(nicholle)\nScrewball(nicholle)\nSwordlike(nicholle)\nBestrew(nicholle, merle)\nVindicate(nicholle, jakob)\nVindicate(nicholle, merle)\nforall x (Prosy(x) and Swordlike(x) -> Promote(x, jakob))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, jakob) and Bestrew(jakob, merle) -> Swordlike(jakob))\nforall x (Promote(x, nicholle) -> Promote(nicholle, merle))\n\nnot Swordlike(nicholle)\n\ntherefore Swordlike(nicholle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The meara is canny. The meara is bodyless. The meara interpret the thaxter. The meara crumble the thaxter. The thaxter cremate the meara. The thaxter cremate the paco. The thaxter is bluish. The thaxter is canny. The thaxter interpret the paco. The thaxter crumble the meara. The paco is bluish. The paco is bodyless. The paco is haughty. The paco interpret the thaxter. The paco crumble the meara. The paco crumble the thaxter. If something is canny and haughty then it cremate the meara. If something crumble the meara and the meara interpret the thaxter then the meara is haughty. If something cremate the paco then the paco cremate the thaxter. The paco cremate the thaxter.", "logic": "\nCanny(meara)\nBodyless(meara)\nInterpret(meara, thaxter)\nCrumble(meara, thaxter)\nCremate(thaxter, meara)\nCremate(thaxter, paco)\nBluish(thaxter)\nCanny(thaxter)\nInterpret(thaxter, paco)\nCrumble(thaxter, meara)\nBluish(paco)\nBodyless(paco)\nHaughty(paco)\nInterpret(paco, thaxter)\nCrumble(paco, meara)\nCrumble(paco, thaxter)\nforall x (Canny(x) and Haughty(x) -> Cremate(x, meara))\nforall x (Crumble(x, meara) and Interpret(meara, thaxter) -> Haughty(meara))\nforall x (Cremate(x, paco) -> Cremate(paco, thaxter))\n\nCremate(paco, thaxter)\n\nCremate(thaxter, paco) and forall x (Cremate(x, paco) -> Cremate(paco, thaxter)) -> therefore Cremate(paco, thaxter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The dory is agnostical. The dory is algophobic. The dory wing the alfred. The dory solarize the alfred. The alfred expatiate the dory. The alfred expatiate the alyce. The alfred is cryptical. The alfred is agnostical. The alfred wing the alyce. The alfred solarize the dory. The alyce is cryptical. The alyce is algophobic. The alyce is smashing. The alyce wing the alfred. The alyce solarize the dory. The alyce solarize the alfred. If something is agnostical and smashing then it expatiate the dory. If something solarize the dory and the dory wing the alfred then the dory is smashing. If something expatiate the alyce then the alyce expatiate the alfred. The alyce does not eat the alfred.", "logic": "\nAgnostical(dory)\nAlgophobic(dory)\nWing(dory, alfred)\nSolarize(dory, alfred)\nExpatiate(alfred, dory)\nExpatiate(alfred, alyce)\nCryptical(alfred)\nAgnostical(alfred)\nWing(alfred, alyce)\nSolarize(alfred, dory)\nCryptical(alyce)\nAlgophobic(alyce)\nSmashing(alyce)\nWing(alyce, alfred)\nSolarize(alyce, dory)\nSolarize(alyce, alfred)\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and Smashing(x) -> Expatiate(x, dory))\nforall x (Solarize(x, dory) and Wing(dory, alfred) -> Smashing(dory))\nforall x (Expatiate(x, alyce) -> Expatiate(alyce, alfred))\n\nnot Expatiate(alyce, alfred)\n\nExpatiate(alfred, alyce) and forall x (Expatiate(x, alyce) -> Expatiate(alyce, alfred)) -> therefore Expatiate(alyce, alfred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The brewster is largo. The brewster is witching. The brewster aggrieve the abbi. The brewster calligraph the abbi. The abbi second the brewster. The abbi second the linette. The abbi is queer. The abbi is largo. The abbi aggrieve the linette. The abbi calligraph the brewster. The linette is queer. The linette is witching. The linette is coriaceous. The linette aggrieve the abbi. The linette calligraph the brewster. The linette calligraph the abbi. If something is largo and coriaceous then it second the brewster. If something calligraph the brewster and the brewster aggrieve the abbi then the brewster is coriaceous. If something second the linette then the linette second the abbi. The brewster second the brewster.", "logic": "\nLargo(brewster)\nWitching(brewster)\nAggrieve(brewster, abbi)\nCalligraph(brewster, abbi)\nSecond(abbi, brewster)\nSecond(abbi, linette)\nQueer(abbi)\nLargo(abbi)\nAggrieve(abbi, linette)\nCalligraph(abbi, brewster)\nQueer(linette)\nWitching(linette)\nCoriaceous(linette)\nAggrieve(linette, abbi)\nCalligraph(linette, brewster)\nCalligraph(linette, abbi)\nforall x (Largo(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Second(x, brewster))\nforall x (Calligraph(x, brewster) and Aggrieve(brewster, abbi) -> Coriaceous(brewster))\nforall x (Second(x, linette) -> Second(linette, abbi))\n\nSecond(brewster, brewster)\n\nCalligraph(abbi, brewster) and Aggrieve(brewster, abbi) and forall x (Calligraph(x, brewster) and Aggrieve(brewster, abbi) -> Coriaceous(brewster)) -> therefore Coriaceous(brewster) Largo(brewster) and Coriaceous(brewster) and forall x (Largo(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Second(x, brewster)) -> therefore Second(brewster, brewster)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The cookie is tinseled. The cookie is sunrise. The cookie ingeminate the carlie. The cookie antagonize the carlie. The carlie hamstring the cookie. The carlie hamstring the greggory. The carlie is couthie. The carlie is tinseled. The carlie ingeminate the greggory. The carlie antagonize the cookie. The greggory is couthie. The greggory is sunrise. The greggory is wooden. The greggory ingeminate the carlie. The greggory antagonize the cookie. The greggory antagonize the carlie. If something is tinseled and wooden then it hamstring the cookie. If something antagonize the cookie and the cookie ingeminate the carlie then the cookie is wooden. If something hamstring the greggory then the greggory hamstring the carlie. The cookie does not eat the cookie.", "logic": "\nTinseled(cookie)\nSunrise(cookie)\nIngeminate(cookie, carlie)\nAntagonize(cookie, carlie)\nHamstring(carlie, cookie)\nHamstring(carlie, greggory)\nCouthie(carlie)\nTinseled(carlie)\nIngeminate(carlie, greggory)\nAntagonize(carlie, cookie)\nCouthie(greggory)\nSunrise(greggory)\nWooden(greggory)\nIngeminate(greggory, carlie)\nAntagonize(greggory, cookie)\nAntagonize(greggory, carlie)\nforall x (Tinseled(x) and Wooden(x) -> Hamstring(x, cookie))\nforall x (Antagonize(x, cookie) and Ingeminate(cookie, carlie) -> Wooden(cookie))\nforall x (Hamstring(x, greggory) -> Hamstring(greggory, carlie))\n\nnot Hamstring(cookie, cookie)\n\nAntagonize(carlie, cookie) and Ingeminate(cookie, carlie) and forall x (Antagonize(x, cookie) and Ingeminate(cookie, carlie) -> Wooden(cookie)) -> therefore Wooden(cookie) Tinseled(cookie) and Wooden(cookie) and forall x (Tinseled(x) and Wooden(x) -> Hamstring(x, cookie)) -> therefore Hamstring(cookie, cookie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The amalle is thespian. The amalle is antiseptic. The amalle postpose the billi. The amalle site the billi. The billi plastinate the amalle. The billi plastinate the avivah. The billi is lucrative. The billi is thespian. The billi postpose the avivah. The billi site the amalle. The avivah is lucrative. The avivah is antiseptic. The avivah is braced. The avivah postpose the billi. The avivah site the amalle. The avivah site the billi. If something is thespian and braced then it plastinate the amalle. If something site the amalle and the amalle postpose the billi then the amalle is braced. If something plastinate the avivah then the avivah plastinate the billi. The avivah does not eat the amalle.", "logic": "\nThespian(amalle)\nAntiseptic(amalle)\nPostpose(amalle, billi)\nSite(amalle, billi)\nPlastinate(billi, amalle)\nPlastinate(billi, avivah)\nLucrative(billi)\nThespian(billi)\nPostpose(billi, avivah)\nSite(billi, amalle)\nLucrative(avivah)\nAntiseptic(avivah)\nBraced(avivah)\nPostpose(avivah, billi)\nSite(avivah, amalle)\nSite(avivah, billi)\nforall x (Thespian(x) and Braced(x) -> Plastinate(x, amalle))\nforall x (Site(x, amalle) and Postpose(amalle, billi) -> Braced(amalle))\nforall x (Plastinate(x, avivah) -> Plastinate(avivah, billi))\n\nnot Plastinate(avivah, amalle)\n\nforall x (Thespian(x) and Braced(x) -> Plastinate(x, amalle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The judie is kampuchean. The judie is blebby. The judie french the ginnifer. The judie sate the ginnifer. The ginnifer suffocate the judie. The ginnifer suffocate the karyl. The ginnifer is arboresque. The ginnifer is kampuchean. The ginnifer french the karyl. The ginnifer sate the judie. The karyl is arboresque. The karyl is blebby. The karyl is semidark. The karyl french the ginnifer. The karyl sate the judie. The karyl sate the ginnifer. If something is kampuchean and semidark then it suffocate the judie. If something sate the judie and the judie french the ginnifer then the judie is semidark. If something suffocate the karyl then the karyl suffocate the ginnifer. The karyl french the judie.", "logic": "\nKampuchean(judie)\nBlebby(judie)\nFrench(judie, ginnifer)\nSate(judie, ginnifer)\nSuffocate(ginnifer, judie)\nSuffocate(ginnifer, karyl)\nArboresque(ginnifer)\nKampuchean(ginnifer)\nFrench(ginnifer, karyl)\nSate(ginnifer, judie)\nArboresque(karyl)\nBlebby(karyl)\nSemidark(karyl)\nFrench(karyl, ginnifer)\nSate(karyl, judie)\nSate(karyl, ginnifer)\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) and Semidark(x) -> Suffocate(x, judie))\nforall x (Sate(x, judie) and French(judie, ginnifer) -> Semidark(judie))\nforall x (Suffocate(x, karyl) -> Suffocate(karyl, ginnifer))\n\nFrench(karyl, judie)\n\nFrench(karyl, judie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The maury is slippery. The maury is insurgent. The maury greet the niven. The maury imbrue the niven. The niven recite the maury. The niven recite the tobit. The niven is parentless. The niven is slippery. The niven greet the tobit. The niven imbrue the maury. The tobit is parentless. The tobit is insurgent. The tobit is natal. The tobit greet the niven. The tobit imbrue the maury. The tobit imbrue the niven. If something is slippery and natal then it recite the maury. If something imbrue the maury and the maury greet the niven then the maury is natal. If something recite the tobit then the tobit recite the niven. The maury does not eat the tobit.", "logic": "\nSlippery(maury)\nInsurgent(maury)\nGreet(maury, niven)\nImbrue(maury, niven)\nRecite(niven, maury)\nRecite(niven, tobit)\nParentless(niven)\nSlippery(niven)\nGreet(niven, tobit)\nImbrue(niven, maury)\nParentless(tobit)\nInsurgent(tobit)\nNatal(tobit)\nGreet(tobit, niven)\nImbrue(tobit, maury)\nImbrue(tobit, niven)\nforall x (Slippery(x) and Natal(x) -> Recite(x, maury))\nforall x (Imbrue(x, maury) and Greet(maury, niven) -> Natal(maury))\nforall x (Recite(x, tobit) -> Recite(tobit, niven))\n\nnot Recite(maury, tobit)\n\nnot Recite(maury, tobit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The barde is teeny. The barde is earthlike. The barde snub the tina. The barde allay the tina. The tina disinvest the barde. The tina disinvest the katie. The tina is sunny. The tina is teeny. The tina snub the katie. The tina allay the barde. The katie is sunny. The katie is earthlike. The katie is predictive. The katie snub the tina. The katie allay the barde. The katie allay the tina. If something is teeny and predictive then it disinvest the barde. If something allay the barde and the barde snub the tina then the barde is predictive. If something disinvest the katie then the katie disinvest the tina. The tina is blue.", "logic": "\nTeeny(barde)\nEarthlike(barde)\nSnub(barde, tina)\nAllay(barde, tina)\nDisinvest(tina, barde)\nDisinvest(tina, katie)\nSunny(tina)\nTeeny(tina)\nSnub(tina, katie)\nAllay(tina, barde)\nSunny(katie)\nEarthlike(katie)\nPredictive(katie)\nSnub(katie, tina)\nAllay(katie, barde)\nAllay(katie, tina)\nforall x (Teeny(x) and Predictive(x) -> Disinvest(x, barde))\nforall x (Allay(x, barde) and Snub(barde, tina) -> Predictive(barde))\nforall x (Disinvest(x, katie) -> Disinvest(katie, tina))\n\nBlue(tina)\n\nBlue(tina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The kendal is alike. The kendal is here. The kendal mortgage the chad. The kendal presage the chad. The chad jiggle the kendal. The chad jiggle the maisie. The chad is lienal. The chad is alike. The chad mortgage the maisie. The chad presage the kendal. The maisie is lienal. The maisie is here. The maisie is unintended. The maisie mortgage the chad. The maisie presage the kendal. The maisie presage the chad. If something is alike and unintended then it jiggle the kendal. If something presage the kendal and the kendal mortgage the chad then the kendal is unintended. If something jiggle the maisie then the maisie jiggle the chad. The kendal does not eat the chad.", "logic": "\nAlike(kendal)\nHere(kendal)\nMortgage(kendal, chad)\nPresage(kendal, chad)\nJiggle(chad, kendal)\nJiggle(chad, maisie)\nLienal(chad)\nAlike(chad)\nMortgage(chad, maisie)\nPresage(chad, kendal)\nLienal(maisie)\nHere(maisie)\nUnintended(maisie)\nMortgage(maisie, chad)\nPresage(maisie, kendal)\nPresage(maisie, chad)\nforall x (Alike(x) and Unintended(x) -> Jiggle(x, kendal))\nforall x (Presage(x, kendal) and Mortgage(kendal, chad) -> Unintended(kendal))\nforall x (Jiggle(x, maisie) -> Jiggle(maisie, chad))\n\nnot Jiggle(kendal, chad)\n\nnot Jiggle(kendal, chad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The cristine is powered. The cristine is melted. The cristine balloon the trixy. The cristine coexist the trixy. The trixy clean the cristine. The trixy clean the merrile. The trixy is milkless. The trixy is powered. The trixy balloon the merrile. The trixy coexist the cristine. The merrile is milkless. The merrile is melted. The merrile is tubelike. The merrile balloon the trixy. The merrile coexist the cristine. The merrile coexist the trixy. If something is powered and tubelike then it clean the cristine. If something coexist the cristine and the cristine balloon the trixy then the cristine is tubelike. If something clean the merrile then the merrile clean the trixy. The cristine coexist the cristine.", "logic": "\nPowered(cristine)\nMelted(cristine)\nBalloon(cristine, trixy)\nCoexist(cristine, trixy)\nClean(trixy, cristine)\nClean(trixy, merrile)\nMilkless(trixy)\nPowered(trixy)\nBalloon(trixy, merrile)\nCoexist(trixy, cristine)\nMilkless(merrile)\nMelted(merrile)\nTubelike(merrile)\nBalloon(merrile, trixy)\nCoexist(merrile, cristine)\nCoexist(merrile, trixy)\nforall x (Powered(x) and Tubelike(x) -> Clean(x, cristine))\nforall x (Coexist(x, cristine) and Balloon(cristine, trixy) -> Tubelike(cristine))\nforall x (Clean(x, merrile) -> Clean(merrile, trixy))\n\nCoexist(cristine, cristine)\n\nCoexist(cristine, cristine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Anny is unyielding. Nice, embryotic people are ctenoid. If someone is embryotic then they are ctenoid. If someone is bilingual then they are unyielding. If someone is ctenoid and embryotic then they are bilingual. If Anny is unyielding then Anny is embryotic. Cold, bilingual people are nonuple. If someone is bilingual then they are embryotic. All unyielding, ctenoid people are embryotic. Anny is unyielding.", "logic": "\nUnyielding(anny)\nforall x (Canopied(x) and Embryotic(x) -> Ctenoid(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Ctenoid(x))\nforall x (Bilingual(x) -> Unyielding(x))\nforall x (Ctenoid(x) and Embryotic(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nUnyielding(anny) -> Embryotic(anny)\nforall x (Embryotic(x) and Bilingual(x) -> Nonuple(x))\nforall x (Bilingual(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Unyielding(x) and Ctenoid(x) -> Embryotic(x))\n\nUnyielding(anny)\n\ntherefore Unyielding(anny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Celestyna is fortuitous. Nice, inducive people are impeded. If someone is inducive then they are impeded. If someone is slummy then they are fortuitous. If someone is impeded and inducive then they are slummy. If Celestyna is fortuitous then Celestyna is inducive. Cold, slummy people are discontent. If someone is slummy then they are inducive. All fortuitous, impeded people are inducive. Celestyna is not fortuitous.", "logic": "\nFortuitous(celestyna)\nforall x (Taking(x) and Inducive(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (Slummy(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Impeded(x) and Inducive(x) -> Slummy(x))\nFortuitous(celestyna) -> Inducive(celestyna)\nforall x (Inducive(x) and Slummy(x) -> Discontent(x))\nforall x (Slummy(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) and Impeded(x) -> Inducive(x))\n\nnot Fortuitous(celestyna)\n\ntherefore Fortuitous(celestyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Zulema is postmodern. Nice, unjointed people are frictional. If someone is unjointed then they are frictional. If someone is gestural then they are postmodern. If someone is frictional and unjointed then they are gestural. If Zulema is postmodern then Zulema is unjointed. Cold, gestural people are menstrual. If someone is gestural then they are unjointed. All postmodern, frictional people are unjointed. Zulema is unjointed.", "logic": "\nPostmodern(zulema)\nforall x (Grizzled(x) and Unjointed(x) -> Frictional(x))\nforall x (Unjointed(x) -> Frictional(x))\nforall x (Gestural(x) -> Postmodern(x))\nforall x (Frictional(x) and Unjointed(x) -> Gestural(x))\nPostmodern(zulema) -> Unjointed(zulema)\nforall x (Unjointed(x) and Gestural(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nforall x (Gestural(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Postmodern(x) and Frictional(x) -> Unjointed(x))\n\nUnjointed(zulema)\n\nPostmodern(zulema) and Postmodern(zulema) -> Unjointed(zulema) -> therefore Unjointed(zulema)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Vittoria is cussed. Nice, digestible people are provisory. If someone is digestible then they are provisory. If someone is atrip then they are cussed. If someone is provisory and digestible then they are atrip. If Vittoria is cussed then Vittoria is digestible. Cold, atrip people are sabbatic. If someone is atrip then they are digestible. All cussed, provisory people are digestible. Vittoria is not digestible.", "logic": "\nCussed(vittoria)\nforall x (Sidearm(x) and Digestible(x) -> Provisory(x))\nforall x (Digestible(x) -> Provisory(x))\nforall x (Atrip(x) -> Cussed(x))\nforall x (Provisory(x) and Digestible(x) -> Atrip(x))\nCussed(vittoria) -> Digestible(vittoria)\nforall x (Digestible(x) and Atrip(x) -> Sabbatic(x))\nforall x (Atrip(x) -> Digestible(x))\nforall x (Cussed(x) and Provisory(x) -> Digestible(x))\n\nnot Digestible(vittoria)\n\nCussed(vittoria) and Cussed(vittoria) -> Digestible(vittoria) -> therefore Digestible(vittoria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Oriana is epidermic. Nice, tensed people are muhammadan. If someone is tensed then they are muhammadan. If someone is unbridled then they are epidermic. If someone is muhammadan and tensed then they are unbridled. If Oriana is epidermic then Oriana is tensed. Cold, unbridled people are yellowed. If someone is unbridled then they are tensed. All epidermic, muhammadan people are tensed. Oriana is muhammadan.", "logic": "\nEpidermic(oriana)\nforall x (Inferior(x) and Tensed(x) -> Muhammadan(x))\nforall x (Tensed(x) -> Muhammadan(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Epidermic(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) and Tensed(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nEpidermic(oriana) -> Tensed(oriana)\nforall x (Tensed(x) and Unbridled(x) -> Yellowed(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Tensed(x))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) and Muhammadan(x) -> Tensed(x))\n\nMuhammadan(oriana)\n\nEpidermic(oriana) and Epidermic(oriana) -> Tensed(oriana) -> therefore Tensed(oriana) Tensed(oriana) and forall x (Tensed(x) -> Muhammadan(x)) -> therefore Muhammadan(oriana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Harriet is melancholy. Nice, pixilated people are healthful. If someone is pixilated then they are healthful. If someone is festive then they are melancholy. If someone is healthful and pixilated then they are festive. If Harriet is melancholy then Harriet is pixilated. Cold, festive people are neotenic. If someone is festive then they are pixilated. All melancholy, healthful people are pixilated. Harriet is not healthful.", "logic": "\nMelancholy(harriet)\nforall x (Middling(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Healthful(x))\nforall x (Pixilated(x) -> Healthful(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Melancholy(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Festive(x))\nMelancholy(harriet) -> Pixilated(harriet)\nforall x (Pixilated(x) and Festive(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Pixilated(x))\nforall x (Melancholy(x) and Healthful(x) -> Pixilated(x))\n\nnot Healthful(harriet)\n\nMelancholy(harriet) and Melancholy(harriet) -> Pixilated(harriet) -> therefore Pixilated(harriet) Pixilated(harriet) and forall x (Pixilated(x) -> Healthful(x)) -> therefore Healthful(harriet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Janene is commensal. Nice, thenar people are existent. If someone is thenar then they are existent. If someone is conic then they are commensal. If someone is existent and thenar then they are conic. If Janene is commensal then Janene is thenar. Cold, conic people are ideologic. If someone is conic then they are thenar. All commensal, existent people are thenar. Janene is not green.", "logic": "\nCommensal(janene)\nforall x (Topical(x) and Thenar(x) -> Existent(x))\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Existent(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Commensal(x))\nforall x (Existent(x) and Thenar(x) -> Conic(x))\nCommensal(janene) -> Thenar(janene)\nforall x (Thenar(x) and Conic(x) -> Ideologic(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Commensal(x) and Existent(x) -> Thenar(x))\n\nnot Green(janene)\n\nnot Green(janene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Temp is aciculate. Nice, laxative people are blistery. If someone is laxative then they are blistery. If someone is braggy then they are aciculate. If someone is blistery and laxative then they are braggy. If Temp is aciculate then Temp is laxative. Cold, braggy people are antidotal. If someone is braggy then they are laxative. All aciculate, blistery people are laxative. Temp is ischaemic.", "logic": "\nAciculate(temp)\nforall x (Ischaemic(x) and Laxative(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Laxative(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Aciculate(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Laxative(x) -> Braggy(x))\nAciculate(temp) -> Laxative(temp)\nforall x (Laxative(x) and Braggy(x) -> Antidotal(x))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Laxative(x))\nforall x (Aciculate(x) and Blistery(x) -> Laxative(x))\n\nIschaemic(temp)\n\nIschaemic(temp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2053"} {"premises": "Rab is siberian. Shaun is ungummed. Shaun is incapable. Shaun is trifid. Hannibal is tuneless. Hannibal is incapable. Hannibal is trifid. If Hannibal is ungummed then Hannibal is cernuous. If someone is incapable then they are ungummed. Hannibal is tuneless.", "logic": "\nSiberian(rab)\nUngummed(shaun)\nIncapable(shaun)\nTrifid(shaun)\nTuneless(hannibal)\nIncapable(hannibal)\nTrifid(hannibal)\nUngummed(hannibal) -> Cernuous(hannibal)\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Ungummed(x))\n\nTuneless(hannibal)\n\ntherefore Tuneless(hannibal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Deane is immune. Felipe is drear. Felipe is prandial. Felipe is hearable. Temp is regardless. Temp is prandial. Temp is hearable. If Temp is drear then Temp is olive. If someone is prandial then they are drear. Temp is not prandial.", "logic": "\nImmune(deane)\nDrear(felipe)\nPrandial(felipe)\nHearable(felipe)\nRegardless(temp)\nPrandial(temp)\nHearable(temp)\nDrear(temp) -> Olive(temp)\nforall x (Prandial(x) -> Drear(x))\n\nnot Prandial(temp)\n\ntherefore Prandial(temp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Melicent is equestrian. Frannie is silverish. Frannie is blunted. Frannie is sceptred. Jolyn is gabled. Jolyn is blunted. Jolyn is sceptred. If Jolyn is silverish then Jolyn is aslope. If someone is blunted then they are silverish. Jolyn is silverish.", "logic": "\nEquestrian(melicent)\nSilverish(frannie)\nBlunted(frannie)\nSceptred(frannie)\nGabled(jolyn)\nBlunted(jolyn)\nSceptred(jolyn)\nSilverish(jolyn) -> Aslope(jolyn)\nforall x (Blunted(x) -> Silverish(x))\n\nSilverish(jolyn)\n\nBlunted(jolyn) and forall x (Blunted(x) -> Silverish(x)) -> therefore Silverish(jolyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Chariot is accentual. Sena is ecological. Sena is galvanic. Sena is labiate. Phillipe is missed. Phillipe is galvanic. Phillipe is labiate. If Phillipe is ecological then Phillipe is focused. If someone is galvanic then they are ecological. Phillipe is not ecological.", "logic": "\nAccentual(chariot)\nEcological(sena)\nGalvanic(sena)\nLabiate(sena)\nMissed(phillipe)\nGalvanic(phillipe)\nLabiate(phillipe)\nEcological(phillipe) -> Focused(phillipe)\nforall x (Galvanic(x) -> Ecological(x))\n\nnot Ecological(phillipe)\n\nGalvanic(phillipe) and forall x (Galvanic(x) -> Ecological(x)) -> therefore Ecological(phillipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Jeanelle is ashamed. Bettie is actinal. Bettie is supervised. Bettie is apelike. Goldy is twee. Goldy is supervised. Goldy is apelike. If Goldy is actinal then Goldy is plushy. If someone is supervised then they are actinal. Goldy is plushy.", "logic": "\nAshamed(jeanelle)\nActinal(bettie)\nSupervised(bettie)\nApelike(bettie)\nTwee(goldy)\nSupervised(goldy)\nApelike(goldy)\nActinal(goldy) -> Plushy(goldy)\nforall x (Supervised(x) -> Actinal(x))\n\nPlushy(goldy)\n\nSupervised(goldy) and forall x (Supervised(x) -> Actinal(x)) -> therefore Actinal(goldy) Actinal(goldy) and Actinal(goldy) -> Plushy(goldy) -> therefore Plushy(goldy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Rosabelle is aggressive. Adore is drupaceous. Adore is edentate. Adore is millennial. Callie is unliveried. Callie is edentate. Callie is millennial. If Callie is drupaceous then Callie is metabolic. If someone is edentate then they are drupaceous. Callie is not metabolic.", "logic": "\nAggressive(rosabelle)\nDrupaceous(adore)\nEdentate(adore)\nMillennial(adore)\nUnliveried(callie)\nEdentate(callie)\nMillennial(callie)\nDrupaceous(callie) -> Metabolic(callie)\nforall x (Edentate(x) -> Drupaceous(x))\n\nnot Metabolic(callie)\n\nEdentate(callie) and forall x (Edentate(x) -> Drupaceous(x)) -> therefore Drupaceous(callie) Drupaceous(callie) and Drupaceous(callie) -> Metabolic(callie) -> therefore Metabolic(callie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Eolanda is xxix. Sharity is condolent. Sharity is barehanded. Sharity is capacitive. Karalee is clarifying. Karalee is barehanded. Karalee is capacitive. If Karalee is condolent then Karalee is facial. If someone is barehanded then they are condolent. Eolanda is not condolent.", "logic": "\nXxix(eolanda)\nCondolent(sharity)\nBarehanded(sharity)\nCapacitive(sharity)\nClarifying(karalee)\nBarehanded(karalee)\nCapacitive(karalee)\nCondolent(karalee) -> Facial(karalee)\nforall x (Barehanded(x) -> Condolent(x))\n\nnot Condolent(eolanda)\n\nforall x (Barehanded(x) -> Condolent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Carri is open. Ines is passable. Ines is acarpous. Ines is cross. Briney is inodorous. Briney is acarpous. Briney is cross. If Briney is passable then Briney is barefooted. If someone is acarpous then they are passable. Briney is open.", "logic": "\nOpen(carri)\nPassable(ines)\nAcarpous(ines)\nCross(ines)\nInodorous(briney)\nAcarpous(briney)\nCross(briney)\nPassable(briney) -> Barefooted(briney)\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> Passable(x))\n\nOpen(briney)\n\nOpen(briney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Tabbi is tasty. Elnar is tearaway. Elnar is unabused. Elnar is jetting. Adrienne is stomatous. Adrienne is unabused. Adrienne is jetting. If Adrienne is tearaway then Adrienne is bypast. If someone is unabused then they are tearaway. Tabbi is not unabused.", "logic": "\nTasty(tabbi)\nTearaway(elnar)\nUnabused(elnar)\nJetting(elnar)\nStomatous(adrienne)\nUnabused(adrienne)\nJetting(adrienne)\nTearaway(adrienne) -> Bypast(adrienne)\nforall x (Unabused(x) -> Tearaway(x))\n\nnot Unabused(tabbi)\n\nnot Unabused(tabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Bobette is dulcet. Rakel is watercress. Rakel is sitting. Rakel is trifid. Ben is sonant. Ben is sitting. Ben is trifid. If Ben is watercress then Ben is tangy. If someone is sitting then they are watercress. Rakel is big.", "logic": "\nDulcet(bobette)\nWatercress(rakel)\nSitting(rakel)\nTrifid(rakel)\nSonant(ben)\nSitting(ben)\nTrifid(ben)\nWatercress(ben) -> Tangy(ben)\nforall x (Sitting(x) -> Watercress(x))\n\nBig(rakel)\n\nBig(rakel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Angela is apodous. Olaf is devotional. Olaf is passive. Olaf is resinated. Ronda is naiant. Ronda is passive. Ronda is resinated. If Ronda is devotional then Ronda is bellyless. If someone is passive then they are devotional. Angela is not naiant.", "logic": "\nApodous(angela)\nDevotional(olaf)\nPassive(olaf)\nResinated(olaf)\nNaiant(ronda)\nPassive(ronda)\nResinated(ronda)\nDevotional(ronda) -> Bellyless(ronda)\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Devotional(x))\n\nnot Naiant(angela)\n\nnot Naiant(angela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Maryjane is undressed. Hamil is welfarist. Hamil is increasing. Hamil is diamantine. Carolyn is subaqueous. Carolyn is increasing. Carolyn is diamantine. If Carolyn is welfarist then Carolyn is osteal. If someone is increasing then they are welfarist. Hamil is undressed.", "logic": "\nUndressed(maryjane)\nWelfarist(hamil)\nIncreasing(hamil)\nDiamantine(hamil)\nSubaqueous(carolyn)\nIncreasing(carolyn)\nDiamantine(carolyn)\nWelfarist(carolyn) -> Osteal(carolyn)\nforall x (Increasing(x) -> Welfarist(x))\n\nUndressed(hamil)\n\nUndressed(hamil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1545"} {"premises": "Delphina is underbred. Delphina is octal. Delphina is refulgent. If Delphina is lapidarian then Delphina is diarrhoeic. All lapidarian, diarrhoeic things are underbred. If something is refulgent and governable then it is octal. If something is underbred and diarrhoeic then it is untellable. All lapidarian things are untellable. If something is refulgent then it is diarrhoeic. Big, diarrhoeic things are governable. If something is underbred then it is lapidarian. Delphina is octal.", "logic": "\nUnderbred(delphina)\nOctal(delphina)\nRefulgent(delphina)\nLapidarian(delphina) -> Diarrhoeic(delphina)\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Refulgent(x) and Governable(x) -> Octal(x))\nforall x (Underbred(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Refulgent(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Governable(x))\nforall x (Underbred(x) -> Lapidarian(x))\n\nOctal(delphina)\n\ntherefore Octal(delphina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "Aloysius is sprigged. Aloysius is italic. Aloysius is feasible. If Aloysius is unsuited then Aloysius is alacritous. All unsuited, alacritous things are sprigged. If something is feasible and numidian then it is italic. If something is sprigged and alacritous then it is shakeable. All unsuited things are shakeable. If something is feasible then it is alacritous. Big, alacritous things are numidian. If something is sprigged then it is unsuited. Aloysius is not sprigged.", "logic": "\nSprigged(aloysius)\nItalic(aloysius)\nFeasible(aloysius)\nUnsuited(aloysius) -> Alacritous(aloysius)\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Alacritous(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) and Numidian(x) -> Italic(x))\nforall x (Sprigged(x) and Alacritous(x) -> Shakeable(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) -> Shakeable(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Shakeable(x) and Alacritous(x) -> Numidian(x))\nforall x (Sprigged(x) -> Unsuited(x))\n\nnot Sprigged(aloysius)\n\ntherefore Sprigged(aloysius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "Kary is podgy. Kary is pleased. Kary is ungusseted. If Kary is suckled then Kary is unentitled. All suckled, unentitled things are podgy. If something is ungusseted and endurable then it is pleased. If something is podgy and unentitled then it is peptic. All suckled things are peptic. If something is ungusseted then it is unentitled. Big, unentitled things are endurable. If something is podgy then it is suckled. Kary is suckled.", "logic": "\nPodgy(kary)\nPleased(kary)\nUngusseted(kary)\nSuckled(kary) -> Unentitled(kary)\nforall x (Suckled(x) and Unentitled(x) -> Podgy(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and Endurable(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Podgy(x) and Unentitled(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Peptic(x) and Unentitled(x) -> Endurable(x))\nforall x (Podgy(x) -> Suckled(x))\n\nSuckled(kary)\n\nPodgy(kary) and forall x (Podgy(x) -> Suckled(x)) -> therefore Suckled(kary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "Bruno is aboriginal. Bruno is ascetical. Bruno is gullible. If Bruno is hasty then Bruno is stigmatic. All hasty, stigmatic things are aboriginal. If something is gullible and meteoric then it is ascetical. If something is aboriginal and stigmatic then it is fourhanded. All hasty things are fourhanded. If something is gullible then it is stigmatic. Big, stigmatic things are meteoric. If something is aboriginal then it is hasty. Bruno is not stigmatic.", "logic": "\nAboriginal(bruno)\nAscetical(bruno)\nGullible(bruno)\nHasty(bruno) -> Stigmatic(bruno)\nforall x (Hasty(x) and Stigmatic(x) -> Aboriginal(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) and Meteoric(x) -> Ascetical(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) and Stigmatic(x) -> Fourhanded(x))\nforall x (Hasty(x) -> Fourhanded(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) -> Stigmatic(x))\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) and Stigmatic(x) -> Meteoric(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) -> Hasty(x))\n\nnot Stigmatic(bruno)\n\nGullible(bruno) and forall x (Gullible(x) -> Stigmatic(x)) -> therefore Stigmatic(bruno)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "Joy is handsewn. Joy is angelic. Joy is concurrent. If Joy is geological then Joy is assertive. All geological, assertive things are handsewn. If something is concurrent and unseamed then it is angelic. If something is handsewn and assertive then it is disliked. All geological things are disliked. If something is concurrent then it is assertive. Big, assertive things are unseamed. If something is handsewn then it is geological. Joy is disliked.", "logic": "\nHandsewn(joy)\nAngelic(joy)\nConcurrent(joy)\nGeological(joy) -> Assertive(joy)\nforall x (Geological(x) and Assertive(x) -> Handsewn(x))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) and Unseamed(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) and Assertive(x) -> Disliked(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) -> Disliked(x))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) -> Assertive(x))\nforall x (Disliked(x) and Assertive(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) -> Geological(x))\n\nDisliked(joy)\n\nHandsewn(joy) and forall x (Handsewn(x) -> Geological(x)) -> therefore Geological(joy) Geological(joy) and forall x (Geological(x) -> Disliked(x)) -> therefore Disliked(joy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "Joline is alternate. Joline is luxe. Joline is ovarian. If Joline is adjustable then Joline is unsmoothed. All adjustable, unsmoothed things are alternate. If something is ovarian and supported then it is luxe. If something is alternate and unsmoothed then it is silicious. All adjustable things are silicious. If something is ovarian then it is unsmoothed. Big, unsmoothed things are supported. If something is alternate then it is adjustable. Joline is not silicious.", "logic": "\nAlternate(joline)\nLuxe(joline)\nOvarian(joline)\nAdjustable(joline) -> Unsmoothed(joline)\nforall x (Adjustable(x) and Unsmoothed(x) -> Alternate(x))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) and Supported(x) -> Luxe(x))\nforall x (Alternate(x) and Unsmoothed(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) -> Unsmoothed(x))\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Unsmoothed(x) -> Supported(x))\nforall x (Alternate(x) -> Adjustable(x))\n\nnot Silicious(joline)\n\nAlternate(joline) and forall x (Alternate(x) -> Adjustable(x)) -> therefore Adjustable(joline) Adjustable(joline) and forall x (Adjustable(x) -> Silicious(x)) -> therefore Silicious(joline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1386"} {"premises": "The sacha is epidermal. The sacha is rejective. The sacha is libelous. The sacha is not wrathful. The sacha price the orsa. The sacha confiscate the blair. The sacha dogfight the blair. The blair is not epidermal. The blair does not like the sacha. The blair confiscate the sacha. The blair confiscate the orsa. The orsa is libelous. All wrathful people are infective. If someone confiscate the sacha then they are wrathful. If the orsa is wrathful and the orsa price the sacha then the sacha confiscate the blair. The sacha is rejective.", "logic": "\nEpidermal(sacha)\nRejective(sacha)\nLibelous(sacha)\nnot Wrathful(sacha)\nPrice(sacha, orsa)\nConfiscate(sacha, blair)\nDogfight(sacha, blair)\nnot Epidermal(blair)\nnot Price(blair, sacha)\nConfiscate(blair, sacha)\nConfiscate(blair, orsa)\nLibelous(orsa)\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Confiscate(x, sacha) -> Wrathful(x))\nWrathful(orsa) and Price(orsa, sacha) -> Confiscate(sacha, blair)\n\nRejective(sacha)\n\ntherefore Rejective(sacha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The glennie is haemic. The glennie is diluvian. The glennie is animate. The glennie is not eudaemonic. The glennie tiller the delcina. The glennie enfeeble the cynthie. The glennie trek the cynthie. The cynthie is not haemic. The cynthie does not like the glennie. The cynthie enfeeble the glennie. The cynthie enfeeble the delcina. The delcina is animate. All eudaemonic people are couthy. If someone enfeeble the glennie then they are eudaemonic. If the delcina is eudaemonic and the delcina tiller the glennie then the glennie enfeeble the cynthie. The cynthie does not need the glennie.", "logic": "\nHaemic(glennie)\nDiluvian(glennie)\nAnimate(glennie)\nnot Eudaemonic(glennie)\nTiller(glennie, delcina)\nEnfeeble(glennie, cynthie)\nTrek(glennie, cynthie)\nnot Haemic(cynthie)\nnot Tiller(cynthie, glennie)\nEnfeeble(cynthie, glennie)\nEnfeeble(cynthie, delcina)\nAnimate(delcina)\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Couthy(x))\nforall x (Enfeeble(x, glennie) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nEudaemonic(delcina) and Tiller(delcina, glennie) -> Enfeeble(glennie, cynthie)\n\nnot Enfeeble(cynthie, glennie)\n\ntherefore Enfeeble(cynthie, glennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The coleen is upmost. The coleen is sized. The coleen is flickering. The coleen is not deckled. The coleen prepose the yule. The coleen impend the hari. The coleen hanker the hari. The hari is not upmost. The hari does not like the coleen. The hari impend the coleen. The hari impend the yule. The yule is flickering. All deckled people are requisite. If someone impend the coleen then they are deckled. If the yule is deckled and the yule prepose the coleen then the coleen impend the hari. The hari is deckled.", "logic": "\nUpmost(coleen)\nSized(coleen)\nFlickering(coleen)\nnot Deckled(coleen)\nPrepose(coleen, yule)\nImpend(coleen, hari)\nHanker(coleen, hari)\nnot Upmost(hari)\nnot Prepose(hari, coleen)\nImpend(hari, coleen)\nImpend(hari, yule)\nFlickering(yule)\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Impend(x, coleen) -> Deckled(x))\nDeckled(yule) and Prepose(yule, coleen) -> Impend(coleen, hari)\n\nDeckled(hari)\n\nImpend(hari, coleen) and forall x (Impend(x, coleen) -> Deckled(x)) -> therefore Deckled(hari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The frans is sapiens. The frans is estival. The frans is nonaligned. The frans is not impolite. The frans hear the adger. The frans chime the dolorita. The frans scythe the dolorita. The dolorita is not sapiens. The dolorita does not like the frans. The dolorita chime the frans. The dolorita chime the adger. The adger is nonaligned. All impolite people are lonely. If someone chime the frans then they are impolite. If the adger is impolite and the adger hear the frans then the frans chime the dolorita. The dolorita is not impolite.", "logic": "\nSapiens(frans)\nEstival(frans)\nNonaligned(frans)\nnot Impolite(frans)\nHear(frans, adger)\nChime(frans, dolorita)\nScythe(frans, dolorita)\nnot Sapiens(dolorita)\nnot Hear(dolorita, frans)\nChime(dolorita, frans)\nChime(dolorita, adger)\nNonaligned(adger)\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Lonely(x))\nforall x (Chime(x, frans) -> Impolite(x))\nImpolite(adger) and Hear(adger, frans) -> Chime(frans, dolorita)\n\nnot Impolite(dolorita)\n\nChime(dolorita, frans) and forall x (Chime(x, frans) -> Impolite(x)) -> therefore Impolite(dolorita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The barnebas is crackers. The barnebas is moraceous. The barnebas is loverlike. The barnebas is not quasi. The barnebas lark the thornie. The barnebas creolize the revkah. The barnebas itemize the revkah. The revkah is not crackers. The revkah does not like the barnebas. The revkah creolize the barnebas. The revkah creolize the thornie. The thornie is loverlike. All quasi people are drowsy. If someone creolize the barnebas then they are quasi. If the thornie is quasi and the thornie lark the barnebas then the barnebas creolize the revkah. The revkah is drowsy.", "logic": "\nCrackers(barnebas)\nMoraceous(barnebas)\nLoverlike(barnebas)\nnot Quasi(barnebas)\nLark(barnebas, thornie)\nCreolize(barnebas, revkah)\nItemize(barnebas, revkah)\nnot Crackers(revkah)\nnot Lark(revkah, barnebas)\nCreolize(revkah, barnebas)\nCreolize(revkah, thornie)\nLoverlike(thornie)\nforall x (Quasi(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Creolize(x, barnebas) -> Quasi(x))\nQuasi(thornie) and Lark(thornie, barnebas) -> Creolize(barnebas, revkah)\n\nDrowsy(revkah)\n\nCreolize(revkah, barnebas) and forall x (Creolize(x, barnebas) -> Quasi(x)) -> therefore Quasi(revkah) Quasi(revkah) and forall x (Quasi(x) -> Drowsy(x)) -> therefore Drowsy(revkah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The mitchael is spick. The mitchael is certified. The mitchael is talky. The mitchael is not unscalable. The mitchael cinematise the ryan. The mitchael echo the cammie. The mitchael fleet the cammie. The cammie is not spick. The cammie does not like the mitchael. The cammie echo the mitchael. The cammie echo the ryan. The ryan is talky. All unscalable people are sturdy. If someone echo the mitchael then they are unscalable. If the ryan is unscalable and the ryan cinematise the mitchael then the mitchael echo the cammie. The cammie is not sturdy.", "logic": "\nSpick(mitchael)\nCertified(mitchael)\nTalky(mitchael)\nnot Unscalable(mitchael)\nCinematise(mitchael, ryan)\nEcho(mitchael, cammie)\nFleet(mitchael, cammie)\nnot Spick(cammie)\nnot Cinematise(cammie, mitchael)\nEcho(cammie, mitchael)\nEcho(cammie, ryan)\nTalky(ryan)\nforall x (Unscalable(x) -> Sturdy(x))\nforall x (Echo(x, mitchael) -> Unscalable(x))\nUnscalable(ryan) and Cinematise(ryan, mitchael) -> Echo(mitchael, cammie)\n\nnot Sturdy(cammie)\n\nEcho(cammie, mitchael) and forall x (Echo(x, mitchael) -> Unscalable(x)) -> therefore Unscalable(cammie) Unscalable(cammie) and forall x (Unscalable(x) -> Sturdy(x)) -> therefore Sturdy(cammie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The winn is sunstruck. The winn is arillate. The winn is eightfold. The winn is not consensual. The winn empower the berke. The winn traumatise the wrennie. The winn suggest the wrennie. The wrennie is not sunstruck. The wrennie does not like the winn. The wrennie traumatise the winn. The wrennie traumatise the berke. The berke is eightfold. All consensual people are adherent. If someone traumatise the winn then they are consensual. If the berke is consensual and the berke empower the winn then the winn traumatise the wrennie. The berke is not adherent.", "logic": "\nSunstruck(winn)\nArillate(winn)\nEightfold(winn)\nnot Consensual(winn)\nEmpower(winn, berke)\nTraumatise(winn, wrennie)\nSuggest(winn, wrennie)\nnot Sunstruck(wrennie)\nnot Empower(wrennie, winn)\nTraumatise(wrennie, winn)\nTraumatise(wrennie, berke)\nEightfold(berke)\nforall x (Consensual(x) -> Adherent(x))\nforall x (Traumatise(x, winn) -> Consensual(x))\nConsensual(berke) and Empower(berke, winn) -> Traumatise(winn, wrennie)\n\nnot Adherent(berke)\n\nforall x (Consensual(x) -> Adherent(x)) <- forall x (Traumatise(x, winn) -> Consensual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The alicia is chemical. The alicia is spacial. The alicia is practical. The alicia is not chthonian. The alicia cringe the modestine. The alicia uncross the ramon. The alicia muff the ramon. The ramon is not chemical. The ramon does not like the alicia. The ramon uncross the alicia. The ramon uncross the modestine. The modestine is practical. All chthonian people are prima. If someone uncross the alicia then they are chthonian. If the modestine is chthonian and the modestine cringe the alicia then the alicia uncross the ramon. The alicia is prima.", "logic": "\nChemical(alicia)\nSpacial(alicia)\nPractical(alicia)\nnot Chthonian(alicia)\nCringe(alicia, modestine)\nUncross(alicia, ramon)\nMuff(alicia, ramon)\nnot Chemical(ramon)\nnot Cringe(ramon, alicia)\nUncross(ramon, alicia)\nUncross(ramon, modestine)\nPractical(modestine)\nforall x (Chthonian(x) -> Prima(x))\nforall x (Uncross(x, alicia) -> Chthonian(x))\nChthonian(modestine) and Cringe(modestine, alicia) -> Uncross(alicia, ramon)\n\nPrima(alicia)\n\nforall x (Chthonian(x) -> Prima(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The polly is glib. The polly is impure. The polly is blunt. The polly is not motivated. The polly lack the honey. The polly transition the claudine. The polly dock the claudine. The claudine is not glib. The claudine does not like the polly. The claudine transition the polly. The claudine transition the honey. The honey is blunt. All motivated people are fatless. If someone transition the polly then they are motivated. If the honey is motivated and the honey lack the polly then the polly transition the claudine. The honey is not motivated.", "logic": "\nGlib(polly)\nImpure(polly)\nBlunt(polly)\nnot Motivated(polly)\nLack(polly, honey)\nTransition(polly, claudine)\nDock(polly, claudine)\nnot Glib(claudine)\nnot Lack(claudine, polly)\nTransition(claudine, polly)\nTransition(claudine, honey)\nBlunt(honey)\nforall x (Motivated(x) -> Fatless(x))\nforall x (Transition(x, polly) -> Motivated(x))\nMotivated(honey) and Lack(honey, polly) -> Transition(polly, claudine)\n\nnot Motivated(honey)\n\nforall x (Transition(x, polly) -> Motivated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The bradly is deistic. The bradly is mitigable. The bradly is shameful. The bradly is not churchly. The bradly vacuum the martha. The bradly reinstate the sunny. The bradly crucify the sunny. The sunny is not deistic. The sunny does not like the bradly. The sunny reinstate the bradly. The sunny reinstate the martha. The martha is shameful. All churchly people are askant. If someone reinstate the bradly then they are churchly. If the martha is churchly and the martha vacuum the bradly then the bradly reinstate the sunny. The bradly reinstate the bradly.", "logic": "\nDeistic(bradly)\nMitigable(bradly)\nShameful(bradly)\nnot Churchly(bradly)\nVacuum(bradly, martha)\nReinstate(bradly, sunny)\nCrucify(bradly, sunny)\nnot Deistic(sunny)\nnot Vacuum(sunny, bradly)\nReinstate(sunny, bradly)\nReinstate(sunny, martha)\nShameful(martha)\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Askant(x))\nforall x (Reinstate(x, bradly) -> Churchly(x))\nChurchly(martha) and Vacuum(martha, bradly) -> Reinstate(bradly, sunny)\n\nReinstate(bradly, bradly)\n\nReinstate(bradly, bradly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The gilberte is unrepaired. The gilberte is pantropic. The gilberte is salvific. The gilberte is not tenderized. The gilberte calcimine the marlyn. The gilberte realign the herby. The gilberte shrivel the herby. The herby is not unrepaired. The herby does not like the gilberte. The herby realign the gilberte. The herby realign the marlyn. The marlyn is salvific. All tenderized people are cystic. If someone realign the gilberte then they are tenderized. If the marlyn is tenderized and the marlyn calcimine the gilberte then the gilberte realign the herby. The herby does not like the herby.", "logic": "\nUnrepaired(gilberte)\nPantropic(gilberte)\nSalvific(gilberte)\nnot Tenderized(gilberte)\nCalcimine(gilberte, marlyn)\nRealign(gilberte, herby)\nShrivel(gilberte, herby)\nnot Unrepaired(herby)\nnot Calcimine(herby, gilberte)\nRealign(herby, gilberte)\nRealign(herby, marlyn)\nSalvific(marlyn)\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Cystic(x))\nforall x (Realign(x, gilberte) -> Tenderized(x))\nTenderized(marlyn) and Calcimine(marlyn, gilberte) -> Realign(gilberte, herby)\n\nnot Calcimine(herby, herby)\n\nnot Calcimine(herby, herby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "The raine is umteen. The raine is diabolical. The raine is romantic. The raine is not bursiform. The raine shatter the elyse. The raine fool the pierson. The raine trowel the pierson. The pierson is not umteen. The pierson does not like the raine. The pierson fool the raine. The pierson fool the elyse. The elyse is romantic. All bursiform people are grazed. If someone fool the raine then they are bursiform. If the elyse is bursiform and the elyse shatter the raine then the raine fool the pierson. The raine shatter the raine.", "logic": "\nUmteen(raine)\nDiabolical(raine)\nRomantic(raine)\nnot Bursiform(raine)\nShatter(raine, elyse)\nFool(raine, pierson)\nTrowel(raine, pierson)\nnot Umteen(pierson)\nnot Shatter(pierson, raine)\nFool(pierson, raine)\nFool(pierson, elyse)\nRomantic(elyse)\nforall x (Bursiform(x) -> Grazed(x))\nforall x (Fool(x, raine) -> Bursiform(x))\nBursiform(elyse) and Shatter(elyse, raine) -> Fool(raine, pierson)\n\nShatter(raine, raine)\n\nShatter(raine, raine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-683"} {"premises": "Willa is wakeful. Willa is not earthlike. Paule is riant. Paule is wakeful. Fiann is biannual. Fiann is earthlike. Annamaria is washy. If Fiann is wakeful then Fiann is evenhanded. If Fiann is riant and Fiann is not wakeful then Fiann is not biannual. If something is wakeful and not earthlike then it is evenhanded. If something is earthlike and not evenhanded then it is natural. If something is wakeful then it is natural. If Willa is natural and Willa is earthlike then Willa is riant. White, earthlike things are not biannual. All natural things are biannual. Willa is wakeful.", "logic": "\nWakeful(willa)\nnot Earthlike(willa)\nRiant(paule)\nWakeful(paule)\nBiannual(fiann)\nEarthlike(fiann)\nWashy(annamaria)\nWakeful(fiann) -> Evenhanded(fiann)\nRiant(fiann) and not Wakeful(fiann) -> not Biannual(fiann)\nforall x (Wakeful(x) and not Earthlike(x) -> Evenhanded(x))\nforall x (Earthlike(x) and not Evenhanded(x) -> Natural(x))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) -> Natural(x))\nNatural(willa) and Earthlike(willa) -> Riant(willa)\nforall x (Wakeful(x) and Earthlike(x) -> not Biannual(x))\nforall x (Natural(x) -> Biannual(x))\n\nWakeful(willa)\n\ntherefore Wakeful(willa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Leena is hypnoid. Leena is not acetous. Barry is tousled. Barry is hypnoid. Kaycee is packed. Kaycee is acetous. Matty is cropped. If Kaycee is hypnoid then Kaycee is feudatory. If Kaycee is tousled and Kaycee is not hypnoid then Kaycee is not packed. If something is hypnoid and not acetous then it is feudatory. If something is acetous and not feudatory then it is blotto. If something is hypnoid then it is blotto. If Leena is blotto and Leena is acetous then Leena is tousled. White, acetous things are not packed. All blotto things are packed. Barry is not hypnoid.", "logic": "\nHypnoid(leena)\nnot Acetous(leena)\nTousled(barry)\nHypnoid(barry)\nPacked(kaycee)\nAcetous(kaycee)\nCropped(matty)\nHypnoid(kaycee) -> Feudatory(kaycee)\nTousled(kaycee) and not Hypnoid(kaycee) -> not Packed(kaycee)\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and not Acetous(x) -> Feudatory(x))\nforall x (Acetous(x) and not Feudatory(x) -> Blotto(x))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) -> Blotto(x))\nBlotto(leena) and Acetous(leena) -> Tousled(leena)\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Acetous(x) -> not Packed(x))\nforall x (Blotto(x) -> Packed(x))\n\nnot Hypnoid(barry)\n\ntherefore Hypnoid(barry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Emmie is taxpaying. Emmie is not exacting. Maxim is unearthly. Maxim is taxpaying. Lacee is atomic. Lacee is exacting. Hermy is assamese. If Lacee is taxpaying then Lacee is sarcoid. If Lacee is unearthly and Lacee is not taxpaying then Lacee is not atomic. If something is taxpaying and not exacting then it is sarcoid. If something is exacting and not sarcoid then it is monoatomic. If something is taxpaying then it is monoatomic. If Emmie is monoatomic and Emmie is exacting then Emmie is unearthly. White, exacting things are not atomic. All monoatomic things are atomic. Maxim is monoatomic.", "logic": "\nTaxpaying(emmie)\nnot Exacting(emmie)\nUnearthly(maxim)\nTaxpaying(maxim)\nAtomic(lacee)\nExacting(lacee)\nAssamese(hermy)\nTaxpaying(lacee) -> Sarcoid(lacee)\nUnearthly(lacee) and not Taxpaying(lacee) -> not Atomic(lacee)\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) and not Exacting(x) -> Sarcoid(x))\nforall x (Exacting(x) and not Sarcoid(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nMonoatomic(emmie) and Exacting(emmie) -> Unearthly(emmie)\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) and Exacting(x) -> not Atomic(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Atomic(x))\n\nMonoatomic(maxim)\n\nTaxpaying(maxim) and forall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Monoatomic(x)) -> therefore Monoatomic(maxim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Clayborne is relentless. Clayborne is not solid. Emmaline is grim. Emmaline is relentless. Maryl is grumous. Maryl is solid. Star is gaseous. If Maryl is relentless then Maryl is narrow. If Maryl is grim and Maryl is not relentless then Maryl is not grumous. If something is relentless and not solid then it is narrow. If something is solid and not narrow then it is laughable. If something is relentless then it is laughable. If Clayborne is laughable and Clayborne is solid then Clayborne is grim. White, solid things are not grumous. All laughable things are grumous. Emmaline is not laughable.", "logic": "\nRelentless(clayborne)\nnot Solid(clayborne)\nGrim(emmaline)\nRelentless(emmaline)\nGrumous(maryl)\nSolid(maryl)\nGaseous(star)\nRelentless(maryl) -> Narrow(maryl)\nGrim(maryl) and not Relentless(maryl) -> not Grumous(maryl)\nforall x (Relentless(x) and not Solid(x) -> Narrow(x))\nforall x (Solid(x) and not Narrow(x) -> Laughable(x))\nforall x (Relentless(x) -> Laughable(x))\nLaughable(clayborne) and Solid(clayborne) -> Grim(clayborne)\nforall x (Relentless(x) and Solid(x) -> not Grumous(x))\nforall x (Laughable(x) -> Grumous(x))\n\nnot Laughable(emmaline)\n\nRelentless(emmaline) and forall x (Relentless(x) -> Laughable(x)) -> therefore Laughable(emmaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Davidde is diagonal. Davidde is not etiolated. Simone is flavorous. Simone is diagonal. Euphemia is birch. Euphemia is etiolated. Catha is blazing. If Euphemia is diagonal then Euphemia is personal. If Euphemia is flavorous and Euphemia is not diagonal then Euphemia is not birch. If something is diagonal and not etiolated then it is personal. If something is etiolated and not personal then it is dished. If something is diagonal then it is dished. If Davidde is dished and Davidde is etiolated then Davidde is flavorous. White, etiolated things are not birch. All dished things are birch. Simone is birch.", "logic": "\nDiagonal(davidde)\nnot Etiolated(davidde)\nFlavorous(simone)\nDiagonal(simone)\nBirch(euphemia)\nEtiolated(euphemia)\nBlazing(catha)\nDiagonal(euphemia) -> Personal(euphemia)\nFlavorous(euphemia) and not Diagonal(euphemia) -> not Birch(euphemia)\nforall x (Diagonal(x) and not Etiolated(x) -> Personal(x))\nforall x (Etiolated(x) and not Personal(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Diagonal(x) -> Dished(x))\nDished(davidde) and Etiolated(davidde) -> Flavorous(davidde)\nforall x (Diagonal(x) and Etiolated(x) -> not Birch(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Birch(x))\n\nBirch(simone)\n\nDiagonal(simone) and forall x (Diagonal(x) -> Dished(x)) -> therefore Dished(simone) Dished(simone) and forall x (Dished(x) -> Birch(x)) -> therefore Birch(simone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Gardiner is depletable. Gardiner is not inaugural. Goldarina is uncool. Goldarina is depletable. Buffy is halt. Buffy is inaugural. Madison is fantastic. If Buffy is depletable then Buffy is incendiary. If Buffy is uncool and Buffy is not depletable then Buffy is not halt. If something is depletable and not inaugural then it is incendiary. If something is inaugural and not incendiary then it is favored. If something is depletable then it is favored. If Gardiner is favored and Gardiner is inaugural then Gardiner is uncool. White, inaugural things are not halt. All favored things are halt. Gardiner is not halt.", "logic": "\nDepletable(gardiner)\nnot Inaugural(gardiner)\nUncool(goldarina)\nDepletable(goldarina)\nHalt(buffy)\nInaugural(buffy)\nFantastic(madison)\nDepletable(buffy) -> Incendiary(buffy)\nUncool(buffy) and not Depletable(buffy) -> not Halt(buffy)\nforall x (Depletable(x) and not Inaugural(x) -> Incendiary(x))\nforall x (Inaugural(x) and not Incendiary(x) -> Favored(x))\nforall x (Depletable(x) -> Favored(x))\nFavored(gardiner) and Inaugural(gardiner) -> Uncool(gardiner)\nforall x (Depletable(x) and Inaugural(x) -> not Halt(x))\nforall x (Favored(x) -> Halt(x))\n\nnot Halt(gardiner)\n\nDepletable(gardiner) and forall x (Depletable(x) -> Favored(x)) -> therefore Favored(gardiner) Favored(gardiner) and forall x (Favored(x) -> Halt(x)) -> therefore Halt(gardiner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Anthony is malian. Anthony is not murine. Pierre is fatless. Pierre is malian. Kirk is noisy. Kirk is murine. Niles is sheltered. If Kirk is malian then Kirk is evitable. If Kirk is fatless and Kirk is not malian then Kirk is not noisy. If something is malian and not murine then it is evitable. If something is murine and not evitable then it is metatarsal. If something is malian then it is metatarsal. If Anthony is metatarsal and Anthony is murine then Anthony is fatless. White, murine things are not noisy. All metatarsal things are noisy. Pierre is not evitable.", "logic": "\nMalian(anthony)\nnot Murine(anthony)\nFatless(pierre)\nMalian(pierre)\nNoisy(kirk)\nMurine(kirk)\nSheltered(niles)\nMalian(kirk) -> Evitable(kirk)\nFatless(kirk) and not Malian(kirk) -> not Noisy(kirk)\nforall x (Malian(x) and not Murine(x) -> Evitable(x))\nforall x (Murine(x) and not Evitable(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\nforall x (Malian(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\nMetatarsal(anthony) and Murine(anthony) -> Fatless(anthony)\nforall x (Malian(x) and Murine(x) -> not Noisy(x))\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) -> Noisy(x))\n\nnot Evitable(pierre)\n\nforall x (Malian(x) and not Murine(x) -> Evitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Polly is extensive. Polly is not uneager. Malia is robotic. Malia is extensive. Anthony is gathered. Anthony is uneager. Avivah is cacuminal. If Anthony is extensive then Anthony is crabby. If Anthony is robotic and Anthony is not extensive then Anthony is not gathered. If something is extensive and not uneager then it is crabby. If something is uneager and not crabby then it is pleased. If something is extensive then it is pleased. If Polly is pleased and Polly is uneager then Polly is robotic. White, uneager things are not gathered. All pleased things are gathered. Anthony is crabby.", "logic": "\nExtensive(polly)\nnot Uneager(polly)\nRobotic(malia)\nExtensive(malia)\nGathered(anthony)\nUneager(anthony)\nCacuminal(avivah)\nExtensive(anthony) -> Crabby(anthony)\nRobotic(anthony) and not Extensive(anthony) -> not Gathered(anthony)\nforall x (Extensive(x) and not Uneager(x) -> Crabby(x))\nforall x (Uneager(x) and not Crabby(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Pleased(x))\nPleased(polly) and Uneager(polly) -> Robotic(polly)\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Uneager(x) -> not Gathered(x))\nforall x (Pleased(x) -> Gathered(x))\n\nCrabby(anthony)\n\nExtensive(anthony) -> Crabby(anthony) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Gustavus is permissive. Gustavus is not overland. Tadeas is cercarial. Tadeas is permissive. Elias is clattery. Elias is overland. Barnard is russian. If Elias is permissive then Elias is augustan. If Elias is cercarial and Elias is not permissive then Elias is not clattery. If something is permissive and not overland then it is augustan. If something is overland and not augustan then it is decent. If something is permissive then it is decent. If Gustavus is decent and Gustavus is overland then Gustavus is cercarial. White, overland things are not clattery. All decent things are clattery. Barnard is not clattery.", "logic": "\nPermissive(gustavus)\nnot Overland(gustavus)\nCercarial(tadeas)\nPermissive(tadeas)\nClattery(elias)\nOverland(elias)\nRussian(barnard)\nPermissive(elias) -> Augustan(elias)\nCercarial(elias) and not Permissive(elias) -> not Clattery(elias)\nforall x (Permissive(x) and not Overland(x) -> Augustan(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and not Augustan(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Decent(x))\nDecent(gustavus) and Overland(gustavus) -> Cercarial(gustavus)\nforall x (Permissive(x) and Overland(x) -> not Clattery(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) -> Clattery(x))\n\nnot Clattery(barnard)\n\nforall x (Decent(x) -> Clattery(x)) <- forall x (Overland(x) and not Augustan(x) -> Decent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Bartlett is squalid. Bartlett is not placid. Dalton is unapparent. Dalton is squalid. Arden is adaxial. Arden is placid. Geneva is specked. If Arden is squalid then Arden is pejorative. If Arden is unapparent and Arden is not squalid then Arden is not adaxial. If something is squalid and not placid then it is pejorative. If something is placid and not pejorative then it is blistery. If something is squalid then it is blistery. If Bartlett is blistery and Bartlett is placid then Bartlett is unapparent. White, placid things are not adaxial. All blistery things are adaxial. Arden is unapparent.", "logic": "\nSqualid(bartlett)\nnot Placid(bartlett)\nUnapparent(dalton)\nSqualid(dalton)\nAdaxial(arden)\nPlacid(arden)\nSpecked(geneva)\nSqualid(arden) -> Pejorative(arden)\nUnapparent(arden) and not Squalid(arden) -> not Adaxial(arden)\nforall x (Squalid(x) and not Placid(x) -> Pejorative(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) and not Pejorative(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Squalid(x) -> Blistery(x))\nBlistery(bartlett) and Placid(bartlett) -> Unapparent(bartlett)\nforall x (Squalid(x) and Placid(x) -> not Adaxial(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Adaxial(x))\n\nUnapparent(arden)\n\nUnapparent(arden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Teodoro is nether. Teodoro is not nonskid. Sharla is stubbly. Sharla is nether. Morty is peccable. Morty is nonskid. Camilla is overfed. If Morty is nether then Morty is cusped. If Morty is stubbly and Morty is not nether then Morty is not peccable. If something is nether and not nonskid then it is cusped. If something is nonskid and not cusped then it is sorbed. If something is nether then it is sorbed. If Teodoro is sorbed and Teodoro is nonskid then Teodoro is stubbly. White, nonskid things are not peccable. All sorbed things are peccable. Camilla is not stubbly.", "logic": "\nNether(teodoro)\nnot Nonskid(teodoro)\nStubbly(sharla)\nNether(sharla)\nPeccable(morty)\nNonskid(morty)\nOverfed(camilla)\nNether(morty) -> Cusped(morty)\nStubbly(morty) and not Nether(morty) -> not Peccable(morty)\nforall x (Nether(x) and not Nonskid(x) -> Cusped(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) and not Cusped(x) -> Sorbed(x))\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Sorbed(x))\nSorbed(teodoro) and Nonskid(teodoro) -> Stubbly(teodoro)\nforall x (Nether(x) and Nonskid(x) -> not Peccable(x))\nforall x (Sorbed(x) -> Peccable(x))\n\nnot Stubbly(camilla)\n\nnot Stubbly(camilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "Ginnifer is xliii. Ginnifer is not unbolted. Maire is serrulate. Maire is xliii. Moya is nodular. Moya is unbolted. Erminia is semiopaque. If Moya is xliii then Moya is bicyclic. If Moya is serrulate and Moya is not xliii then Moya is not nodular. If something is xliii and not unbolted then it is bicyclic. If something is unbolted and not bicyclic then it is cross. If something is xliii then it is cross. If Ginnifer is cross and Ginnifer is unbolted then Ginnifer is serrulate. White, unbolted things are not nodular. All cross things are nodular. Moya is semiopaque.", "logic": "\nXliii(ginnifer)\nnot Unbolted(ginnifer)\nSerrulate(maire)\nXliii(maire)\nNodular(moya)\nUnbolted(moya)\nSemiopaque(erminia)\nXliii(moya) -> Bicyclic(moya)\nSerrulate(moya) and not Xliii(moya) -> not Nodular(moya)\nforall x (Xliii(x) and not Unbolted(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Unbolted(x) and not Bicyclic(x) -> Cross(x))\nforall x (Xliii(x) -> Cross(x))\nCross(ginnifer) and Unbolted(ginnifer) -> Serrulate(ginnifer)\nforall x (Xliii(x) and Unbolted(x) -> not Nodular(x))\nforall x (Cross(x) -> Nodular(x))\n\nSemiopaque(moya)\n\nSemiopaque(moya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1657"} {"premises": "The zara is calibrated. The zara is invaluable. The zara recruit the joelie. The zara sweat the barbey. The donetta is impassable. The donetta is wasteful. The donetta recruit the barbey. The donetta recruit the joelie. The barbey sweat the donetta. The barbey sweat the joelie. The joelie pounce the donetta. The joelie is impassable. If the donetta is calibrated then the donetta recruit the zara. If the joelie is invaluable and the joelie pounce the zara then the joelie is wasteful. If something pounce the zara and the zara pounce the donetta then the zara is impassable. If something recruit the donetta then the donetta pounce the zara. If something is impassable and it recruit the joelie then it pounce the joelie. If something pounce the donetta then it is calibrated. If something is invaluable then it recruit the donetta. If something sweat the joelie and the joelie is elemental then the joelie is invaluable. The donetta is impassable.", "logic": "\nCalibrated(zara)\nInvaluable(zara)\nRecruit(zara, joelie)\nSweat(zara, barbey)\nImpassable(donetta)\nWasteful(donetta)\nRecruit(donetta, barbey)\nRecruit(donetta, joelie)\nSweat(barbey, donetta)\nSweat(barbey, joelie)\nPounce(joelie, donetta)\nImpassable(joelie)\nCalibrated(donetta) -> Recruit(donetta, zara)\nInvaluable(joelie) and Pounce(joelie, zara) -> Wasteful(joelie)\nforall x (Pounce(x, zara) and Pounce(zara, donetta) -> Impassable(zara))\nforall x (Recruit(x, donetta) -> Pounce(donetta, zara))\nforall x (Impassable(x) and Recruit(x, joelie) -> Pounce(x, joelie))\nforall x (Pounce(x, donetta) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Recruit(x, donetta))\nforall x (Sweat(x, joelie) and Elemental(joelie) -> Invaluable(joelie))\n\nImpassable(donetta)\n\ntherefore Impassable(donetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The ignace is vulturous. The ignace is going. The ignace jabber the sharra. The ignace shellack the damien. The susy is cupulate. The susy is assuasive. The susy jabber the damien. The susy jabber the sharra. The damien shellack the susy. The damien shellack the sharra. The sharra dunk the susy. The sharra is cupulate. If the susy is vulturous then the susy jabber the ignace. If the sharra is going and the sharra dunk the ignace then the sharra is assuasive. If something dunk the ignace and the ignace dunk the susy then the ignace is cupulate. If something jabber the susy then the susy dunk the ignace. If something is cupulate and it jabber the sharra then it dunk the sharra. If something dunk the susy then it is vulturous. If something is going then it jabber the susy. If something shellack the sharra and the sharra is focused then the sharra is going. The sharra is not cupulate.", "logic": "\nVulturous(ignace)\nGoing(ignace)\nJabber(ignace, sharra)\nShellack(ignace, damien)\nCupulate(susy)\nAssuasive(susy)\nJabber(susy, damien)\nJabber(susy, sharra)\nShellack(damien, susy)\nShellack(damien, sharra)\nDunk(sharra, susy)\nCupulate(sharra)\nVulturous(susy) -> Jabber(susy, ignace)\nGoing(sharra) and Dunk(sharra, ignace) -> Assuasive(sharra)\nforall x (Dunk(x, ignace) and Dunk(ignace, susy) -> Cupulate(ignace))\nforall x (Jabber(x, susy) -> Dunk(susy, ignace))\nforall x (Cupulate(x) and Jabber(x, sharra) -> Dunk(x, sharra))\nforall x (Dunk(x, susy) -> Vulturous(x))\nforall x (Going(x) -> Jabber(x, susy))\nforall x (Shellack(x, sharra) and Focused(sharra) -> Going(sharra))\n\nnot Cupulate(sharra)\n\ntherefore Cupulate(sharra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The kimberlyn is fluid. The kimberlyn is bottomless. The kimberlyn realize the kristian. The kimberlyn anastomose the marena. The ayn is regulated. The ayn is crowning. The ayn realize the marena. The ayn realize the kristian. The marena anastomose the ayn. The marena anastomose the kristian. The kristian cobble the ayn. The kristian is regulated. If the ayn is fluid then the ayn realize the kimberlyn. If the kristian is bottomless and the kristian cobble the kimberlyn then the kristian is crowning. If something cobble the kimberlyn and the kimberlyn cobble the ayn then the kimberlyn is regulated. If something realize the ayn then the ayn cobble the kimberlyn. If something is regulated and it realize the kristian then it cobble the kristian. If something cobble the ayn then it is fluid. If something is bottomless then it realize the ayn. If something anastomose the kristian and the kristian is neuter then the kristian is bottomless. The kimberlyn realize the ayn.", "logic": "\nFluid(kimberlyn)\nBottomless(kimberlyn)\nRealize(kimberlyn, kristian)\nAnastomose(kimberlyn, marena)\nRegulated(ayn)\nCrowning(ayn)\nRealize(ayn, marena)\nRealize(ayn, kristian)\nAnastomose(marena, ayn)\nAnastomose(marena, kristian)\nCobble(kristian, ayn)\nRegulated(kristian)\nFluid(ayn) -> Realize(ayn, kimberlyn)\nBottomless(kristian) and Cobble(kristian, kimberlyn) -> Crowning(kristian)\nforall x (Cobble(x, kimberlyn) and Cobble(kimberlyn, ayn) -> Regulated(kimberlyn))\nforall x (Realize(x, ayn) -> Cobble(ayn, kimberlyn))\nforall x (Regulated(x) and Realize(x, kristian) -> Cobble(x, kristian))\nforall x (Cobble(x, ayn) -> Fluid(x))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) -> Realize(x, ayn))\nforall x (Anastomose(x, kristian) and Neuter(kristian) -> Bottomless(kristian))\n\nRealize(kimberlyn, ayn)\n\nBottomless(kimberlyn) and forall x (Bottomless(x) -> Realize(x, ayn)) -> therefore Realize(kimberlyn, ayn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The kandace is impellent. The kandace is washy. The kandace conga the darrel. The kandace donate the zebulon. The lori is resentful. The lori is xiii. The lori conga the zebulon. The lori conga the darrel. The zebulon donate the lori. The zebulon donate the darrel. The darrel force the lori. The darrel is resentful. If the lori is impellent then the lori conga the kandace. If the darrel is washy and the darrel force the kandace then the darrel is xiii. If something force the kandace and the kandace force the lori then the kandace is resentful. If something conga the lori then the lori force the kandace. If something is resentful and it conga the darrel then it force the darrel. If something force the lori then it is impellent. If something is washy then it conga the lori. If something donate the darrel and the darrel is manichean then the darrel is washy. The lori does not chase the darrel.", "logic": "\nImpellent(kandace)\nWashy(kandace)\nConga(kandace, darrel)\nDonate(kandace, zebulon)\nResentful(lori)\nXiii(lori)\nConga(lori, zebulon)\nConga(lori, darrel)\nDonate(zebulon, lori)\nDonate(zebulon, darrel)\nForce(darrel, lori)\nResentful(darrel)\nImpellent(lori) -> Conga(lori, kandace)\nWashy(darrel) and Force(darrel, kandace) -> Xiii(darrel)\nforall x (Force(x, kandace) and Force(kandace, lori) -> Resentful(kandace))\nforall x (Conga(x, lori) -> Force(lori, kandace))\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Conga(x, darrel) -> Force(x, darrel))\nforall x (Force(x, lori) -> Impellent(x))\nforall x (Washy(x) -> Conga(x, lori))\nforall x (Donate(x, darrel) and Manichean(darrel) -> Washy(darrel))\n\nnot Force(lori, darrel)\n\nResentful(lori) and Conga(lori, darrel) and forall x (Resentful(x) and Conga(x, darrel) -> Force(x, darrel)) -> therefore Force(lori, darrel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The shaun is unfocussed. The shaun is hebrew. The shaun interfere the ivonne. The shaun rappel the phillida. The annaliese is hominine. The annaliese is befogged. The annaliese interfere the phillida. The annaliese interfere the ivonne. The phillida rappel the annaliese. The phillida rappel the ivonne. The ivonne crank the annaliese. The ivonne is hominine. If the annaliese is unfocussed then the annaliese interfere the shaun. If the ivonne is hebrew and the ivonne crank the shaun then the ivonne is befogged. If something crank the shaun and the shaun crank the annaliese then the shaun is hominine. If something interfere the annaliese then the annaliese crank the shaun. If something is hominine and it interfere the ivonne then it crank the ivonne. If something crank the annaliese then it is unfocussed. If something is hebrew then it interfere the annaliese. If something rappel the ivonne and the ivonne is healed then the ivonne is hebrew. The annaliese crank the shaun.", "logic": "\nUnfocussed(shaun)\nHebrew(shaun)\nInterfere(shaun, ivonne)\nRappel(shaun, phillida)\nHominine(annaliese)\nBefogged(annaliese)\nInterfere(annaliese, phillida)\nInterfere(annaliese, ivonne)\nRappel(phillida, annaliese)\nRappel(phillida, ivonne)\nCrank(ivonne, annaliese)\nHominine(ivonne)\nUnfocussed(annaliese) -> Interfere(annaliese, shaun)\nHebrew(ivonne) and Crank(ivonne, shaun) -> Befogged(ivonne)\nforall x (Crank(x, shaun) and Crank(shaun, annaliese) -> Hominine(shaun))\nforall x (Interfere(x, annaliese) -> Crank(annaliese, shaun))\nforall x (Hominine(x) and Interfere(x, ivonne) -> Crank(x, ivonne))\nforall x (Crank(x, annaliese) -> Unfocussed(x))\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Interfere(x, annaliese))\nforall x (Rappel(x, ivonne) and Healed(ivonne) -> Hebrew(ivonne))\n\nCrank(annaliese, shaun)\n\nHebrew(shaun) and forall x (Hebrew(x) -> Interfere(x, annaliese)) -> therefore Interfere(shaun, annaliese) Interfere(shaun, annaliese) and forall x (Interfere(x, annaliese) -> Crank(annaliese, shaun)) -> therefore Crank(annaliese, shaun)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The siffre is floaty. The siffre is unheralded. The siffre ginger the noelani. The siffre felicitate the quintin. The lance is calendered. The lance is liveborn. The lance ginger the quintin. The lance ginger the noelani. The quintin felicitate the lance. The quintin felicitate the noelani. The noelani tope the lance. The noelani is calendered. If the lance is floaty then the lance ginger the siffre. If the noelani is unheralded and the noelani tope the siffre then the noelani is liveborn. If something tope the siffre and the siffre tope the lance then the siffre is calendered. If something ginger the lance then the lance tope the siffre. If something is calendered and it ginger the noelani then it tope the noelani. If something tope the lance then it is floaty. If something is unheralded then it ginger the lance. If something felicitate the noelani and the noelani is deathless then the noelani is unheralded. The lance does not chase the siffre.", "logic": "\nFloaty(siffre)\nUnheralded(siffre)\nGinger(siffre, noelani)\nFelicitate(siffre, quintin)\nCalendered(lance)\nLiveborn(lance)\nGinger(lance, quintin)\nGinger(lance, noelani)\nFelicitate(quintin, lance)\nFelicitate(quintin, noelani)\nTope(noelani, lance)\nCalendered(noelani)\nFloaty(lance) -> Ginger(lance, siffre)\nUnheralded(noelani) and Tope(noelani, siffre) -> Liveborn(noelani)\nforall x (Tope(x, siffre) and Tope(siffre, lance) -> Calendered(siffre))\nforall x (Ginger(x, lance) -> Tope(lance, siffre))\nforall x (Calendered(x) and Ginger(x, noelani) -> Tope(x, noelani))\nforall x (Tope(x, lance) -> Floaty(x))\nforall x (Unheralded(x) -> Ginger(x, lance))\nforall x (Felicitate(x, noelani) and Deathless(noelani) -> Unheralded(noelani))\n\nnot Tope(lance, siffre)\n\nUnheralded(siffre) and forall x (Unheralded(x) -> Ginger(x, lance)) -> therefore Ginger(siffre, lance) Ginger(siffre, lance) and forall x (Ginger(x, lance) -> Tope(lance, siffre)) -> therefore Tope(lance, siffre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The nesta is dignifying. The nesta is pianissimo. The nesta waken the viki. The nesta yank the costa. The latisha is backhanded. The latisha is whirring. The latisha waken the costa. The latisha waken the viki. The costa yank the latisha. The costa yank the viki. The viki ferment the latisha. The viki is backhanded. If the latisha is dignifying then the latisha waken the nesta. If the viki is pianissimo and the viki ferment the nesta then the viki is whirring. If something ferment the nesta and the nesta ferment the latisha then the nesta is backhanded. If something waken the latisha then the latisha ferment the nesta. If something is backhanded and it waken the viki then it ferment the viki. If something ferment the latisha then it is dignifying. If something is pianissimo then it waken the latisha. If something yank the viki and the viki is crocketed then the viki is pianissimo. The costa is not dignifying.", "logic": "\nDignifying(nesta)\nPianissimo(nesta)\nWaken(nesta, viki)\nYank(nesta, costa)\nBackhanded(latisha)\nWhirring(latisha)\nWaken(latisha, costa)\nWaken(latisha, viki)\nYank(costa, latisha)\nYank(costa, viki)\nFerment(viki, latisha)\nBackhanded(viki)\nDignifying(latisha) -> Waken(latisha, nesta)\nPianissimo(viki) and Ferment(viki, nesta) -> Whirring(viki)\nforall x (Ferment(x, nesta) and Ferment(nesta, latisha) -> Backhanded(nesta))\nforall x (Waken(x, latisha) -> Ferment(latisha, nesta))\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Waken(x, viki) -> Ferment(x, viki))\nforall x (Ferment(x, latisha) -> Dignifying(x))\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Waken(x, latisha))\nforall x (Yank(x, viki) and Crocketed(viki) -> Pianissimo(viki))\n\nnot Dignifying(costa)\n\nforall x (Ferment(x, latisha) -> Dignifying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The joel is bladdery. The joel is metalloid. The joel unteach the albrecht. The joel thin the barnett. The hollie is envisioned. The hollie is conceptive. The hollie unteach the barnett. The hollie unteach the albrecht. The barnett thin the hollie. The barnett thin the albrecht. The albrecht botanize the hollie. The albrecht is envisioned. If the hollie is bladdery then the hollie unteach the joel. If the albrecht is metalloid and the albrecht botanize the joel then the albrecht is conceptive. If something botanize the joel and the joel botanize the hollie then the joel is envisioned. If something unteach the hollie then the hollie botanize the joel. If something is envisioned and it unteach the albrecht then it botanize the albrecht. If something botanize the hollie then it is bladdery. If something is metalloid then it unteach the hollie. If something thin the albrecht and the albrecht is phoenician then the albrecht is metalloid. The albrecht unteach the hollie.", "logic": "\nBladdery(joel)\nMetalloid(joel)\nUnteach(joel, albrecht)\nThin(joel, barnett)\nEnvisioned(hollie)\nConceptive(hollie)\nUnteach(hollie, barnett)\nUnteach(hollie, albrecht)\nThin(barnett, hollie)\nThin(barnett, albrecht)\nBotanize(albrecht, hollie)\nEnvisioned(albrecht)\nBladdery(hollie) -> Unteach(hollie, joel)\nMetalloid(albrecht) and Botanize(albrecht, joel) -> Conceptive(albrecht)\nforall x (Botanize(x, joel) and Botanize(joel, hollie) -> Envisioned(joel))\nforall x (Unteach(x, hollie) -> Botanize(hollie, joel))\nforall x (Envisioned(x) and Unteach(x, albrecht) -> Botanize(x, albrecht))\nforall x (Botanize(x, hollie) -> Bladdery(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Unteach(x, hollie))\nforall x (Thin(x, albrecht) and Phoenician(albrecht) -> Metalloid(albrecht))\n\nUnteach(albrecht, hollie)\n\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Unteach(x, hollie)) <- forall x (Thin(x, albrecht) and Phoenician(albrecht) -> Metalloid(albrecht)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The marysa is prenuptial. The marysa is uppercase. The marysa shoo the mohamad. The marysa clamber the klara. The fabian is hypaethral. The fabian is parrotlike. The fabian shoo the klara. The fabian shoo the mohamad. The klara clamber the fabian. The klara clamber the mohamad. The mohamad anger the fabian. The mohamad is hypaethral. If the fabian is prenuptial then the fabian shoo the marysa. If the mohamad is uppercase and the mohamad anger the marysa then the mohamad is parrotlike. If something anger the marysa and the marysa anger the fabian then the marysa is hypaethral. If something shoo the fabian then the fabian anger the marysa. If something is hypaethral and it shoo the mohamad then it anger the mohamad. If something anger the fabian then it is prenuptial. If something is uppercase then it shoo the fabian. If something clamber the mohamad and the mohamad is miasmal then the mohamad is uppercase. The klara does not like the fabian.", "logic": "\nPrenuptial(marysa)\nUppercase(marysa)\nShoo(marysa, mohamad)\nClamber(marysa, klara)\nHypaethral(fabian)\nParrotlike(fabian)\nShoo(fabian, klara)\nShoo(fabian, mohamad)\nClamber(klara, fabian)\nClamber(klara, mohamad)\nAnger(mohamad, fabian)\nHypaethral(mohamad)\nPrenuptial(fabian) -> Shoo(fabian, marysa)\nUppercase(mohamad) and Anger(mohamad, marysa) -> Parrotlike(mohamad)\nforall x (Anger(x, marysa) and Anger(marysa, fabian) -> Hypaethral(marysa))\nforall x (Shoo(x, fabian) -> Anger(fabian, marysa))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) and Shoo(x, mohamad) -> Anger(x, mohamad))\nforall x (Anger(x, fabian) -> Prenuptial(x))\nforall x (Uppercase(x) -> Shoo(x, fabian))\nforall x (Clamber(x, mohamad) and Miasmal(mohamad) -> Uppercase(mohamad))\n\nnot Shoo(klara, fabian)\n\nforall x (Uppercase(x) -> Shoo(x, fabian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The sylvan is forward. The sylvan is scrubby. The sylvan embezzle the anica. The sylvan gambol the kerianne. The trudey is costate. The trudey is noduled. The trudey embezzle the kerianne. The trudey embezzle the anica. The kerianne gambol the trudey. The kerianne gambol the anica. The anica exercise the trudey. The anica is costate. If the trudey is forward then the trudey embezzle the sylvan. If the anica is scrubby and the anica exercise the sylvan then the anica is noduled. If something exercise the sylvan and the sylvan exercise the trudey then the sylvan is costate. If something embezzle the trudey then the trudey exercise the sylvan. If something is costate and it embezzle the anica then it exercise the anica. If something exercise the trudey then it is forward. If something is scrubby then it embezzle the trudey. If something gambol the anica and the anica is slicked then the anica is scrubby. The anica gambol the trudey.", "logic": "\nForward(sylvan)\nScrubby(sylvan)\nEmbezzle(sylvan, anica)\nGambol(sylvan, kerianne)\nCostate(trudey)\nNoduled(trudey)\nEmbezzle(trudey, kerianne)\nEmbezzle(trudey, anica)\nGambol(kerianne, trudey)\nGambol(kerianne, anica)\nExercise(anica, trudey)\nCostate(anica)\nForward(trudey) -> Embezzle(trudey, sylvan)\nScrubby(anica) and Exercise(anica, sylvan) -> Noduled(anica)\nforall x (Exercise(x, sylvan) and Exercise(sylvan, trudey) -> Costate(sylvan))\nforall x (Embezzle(x, trudey) -> Exercise(trudey, sylvan))\nforall x (Costate(x) and Embezzle(x, anica) -> Exercise(x, anica))\nforall x (Exercise(x, trudey) -> Forward(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Embezzle(x, trudey))\nforall x (Gambol(x, anica) and Slicked(anica) -> Scrubby(anica))\n\nGambol(anica, trudey)\n\nGambol(anica, trudey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The sven is unplayable. The sven is icteric. The sven shade the matthus. The sven visit the lucian. The morley is marian. The morley is unstuck. The morley shade the lucian. The morley shade the matthus. The lucian visit the morley. The lucian visit the matthus. The matthus literalize the morley. The matthus is marian. If the morley is unplayable then the morley shade the sven. If the matthus is icteric and the matthus literalize the sven then the matthus is unstuck. If something literalize the sven and the sven literalize the morley then the sven is marian. If something shade the morley then the morley literalize the sven. If something is marian and it shade the matthus then it literalize the matthus. If something literalize the morley then it is unplayable. If something is icteric then it shade the morley. If something visit the matthus and the matthus is billowing then the matthus is icteric. The sven does not visit the morley.", "logic": "\nUnplayable(sven)\nIcteric(sven)\nShade(sven, matthus)\nVisit(sven, lucian)\nMarian(morley)\nUnstuck(morley)\nShade(morley, lucian)\nShade(morley, matthus)\nVisit(lucian, morley)\nVisit(lucian, matthus)\nLiteralize(matthus, morley)\nMarian(matthus)\nUnplayable(morley) -> Shade(morley, sven)\nIcteric(matthus) and Literalize(matthus, sven) -> Unstuck(matthus)\nforall x (Literalize(x, sven) and Literalize(sven, morley) -> Marian(sven))\nforall x (Shade(x, morley) -> Literalize(morley, sven))\nforall x (Marian(x) and Shade(x, matthus) -> Literalize(x, matthus))\nforall x (Literalize(x, morley) -> Unplayable(x))\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> Shade(x, morley))\nforall x (Visit(x, matthus) and Billowing(matthus) -> Icteric(matthus))\n\nnot Visit(sven, morley)\n\nnot Visit(sven, morley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "The merci is gargantuan. The merci is lxviii. The merci elect the minda. The merci crescendo the linoel. The devi is topknotted. The devi is jumbo. The devi elect the linoel. The devi elect the minda. The linoel crescendo the devi. The linoel crescendo the minda. The minda rededicate the devi. The minda is topknotted. If the devi is gargantuan then the devi elect the merci. If the minda is lxviii and the minda rededicate the merci then the minda is jumbo. If something rededicate the merci and the merci rededicate the devi then the merci is topknotted. If something elect the devi then the devi rededicate the merci. If something is topknotted and it elect the minda then it rededicate the minda. If something rededicate the devi then it is gargantuan. If something is lxviii then it elect the devi. If something crescendo the minda and the minda is prevalent then the minda is lxviii. The linoel elect the linoel.", "logic": "\nGargantuan(merci)\nLxviii(merci)\nElect(merci, minda)\nCrescendo(merci, linoel)\nTopknotted(devi)\nJumbo(devi)\nElect(devi, linoel)\nElect(devi, minda)\nCrescendo(linoel, devi)\nCrescendo(linoel, minda)\nRededicate(minda, devi)\nTopknotted(minda)\nGargantuan(devi) -> Elect(devi, merci)\nLxviii(minda) and Rededicate(minda, merci) -> Jumbo(minda)\nforall x (Rededicate(x, merci) and Rededicate(merci, devi) -> Topknotted(merci))\nforall x (Elect(x, devi) -> Rededicate(devi, merci))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) and Elect(x, minda) -> Rededicate(x, minda))\nforall x (Rededicate(x, devi) -> Gargantuan(x))\nforall x (Lxviii(x) -> Elect(x, devi))\nforall x (Crescendo(x, minda) and Prevalent(minda) -> Lxviii(minda))\n\nElect(linoel, linoel)\n\nElect(linoel, linoel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Wilbert is unburdened. Wilbert is aired. Wilbert is devoted. Wilbert is undercover. Leodora is swaggering. Prince is deathly. Wake is threescore. If Wake is threescore then Wake is devoted. If Leodora is swaggering and Leodora is deathly then Leodora is not undercover. Big, devoted people are not undercover. Wilbert is unburdened.", "logic": "\nUnburdened(wilbert)\nAired(wilbert)\nDevoted(wilbert)\nUndercover(wilbert)\nSwaggering(leodora)\nDeathly(prince)\nThreescore(wake)\nThreescore(wake) -> Devoted(wake)\nSwaggering(leodora) and Deathly(leodora) -> not Undercover(leodora)\nforall x (Threescore(x) and Devoted(x) -> not Undercover(x))\n\nUnburdened(wilbert)\n\ntherefore Unburdened(wilbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Livia is jellied. Livia is tangential. Livia is alary. Livia is afghani. Lynda is ironical. Lonna is unpierced. Vonnie is gimpy. If Vonnie is gimpy then Vonnie is alary. If Lynda is ironical and Lynda is unpierced then Lynda is not afghani. Big, alary people are not afghani. Lynda is not ironical.", "logic": "\nJellied(livia)\nTangential(livia)\nAlary(livia)\nAfghani(livia)\nIronical(lynda)\nUnpierced(lonna)\nGimpy(vonnie)\nGimpy(vonnie) -> Alary(vonnie)\nIronical(lynda) and Unpierced(lynda) -> not Afghani(lynda)\nforall x (Gimpy(x) and Alary(x) -> not Afghani(x))\n\nnot Ironical(lynda)\n\ntherefore Ironical(lynda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Edithe is graceful. Edithe is purebred. Edithe is endermatic. Edithe is modest. Tuckie is tedious. Sabra is extremist. Yehudit is prayerful. If Yehudit is prayerful then Yehudit is endermatic. If Tuckie is tedious and Tuckie is extremist then Tuckie is not modest. Big, endermatic people are not modest. Yehudit is endermatic.", "logic": "\nGraceful(edithe)\nPurebred(edithe)\nEndermatic(edithe)\nModest(edithe)\nTedious(tuckie)\nExtremist(sabra)\nPrayerful(yehudit)\nPrayerful(yehudit) -> Endermatic(yehudit)\nTedious(tuckie) and Extremist(tuckie) -> not Modest(tuckie)\nforall x (Prayerful(x) and Endermatic(x) -> not Modest(x))\n\nEndermatic(yehudit)\n\nPrayerful(yehudit) and Prayerful(yehudit) -> Endermatic(yehudit) -> therefore Endermatic(yehudit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Teresina is expiative. Teresina is chemic. Teresina is cultural. Teresina is honorific. Claudelle is oversexed. Luella is cachectic. Brittany is unshelled. If Brittany is unshelled then Brittany is cultural. If Claudelle is oversexed and Claudelle is cachectic then Claudelle is not honorific. Big, cultural people are not honorific. Brittany is not cultural.", "logic": "\nExpiative(teresina)\nChemic(teresina)\nCultural(teresina)\nHonorific(teresina)\nOversexed(claudelle)\nCachectic(luella)\nUnshelled(brittany)\nUnshelled(brittany) -> Cultural(brittany)\nOversexed(claudelle) and Cachectic(claudelle) -> not Honorific(claudelle)\nforall x (Unshelled(x) and Cultural(x) -> not Honorific(x))\n\nnot Cultural(brittany)\n\nUnshelled(brittany) and Unshelled(brittany) -> Cultural(brittany) -> therefore Cultural(brittany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Cathe is just. Cathe is seamanlike. Cathe is ocher. Cathe is curious. Pascale is hardbound. Rozanna is unpaired. Ines is alaskan. If Ines is alaskan then Ines is ocher. If Pascale is hardbound and Pascale is unpaired then Pascale is not curious. Big, ocher people are not curious. Ines is not curious.", "logic": "\nJust(cathe)\nSeamanlike(cathe)\nOcher(cathe)\nCurious(cathe)\nHardbound(pascale)\nUnpaired(rozanna)\nAlaskan(ines)\nAlaskan(ines) -> Ocher(ines)\nHardbound(pascale) and Unpaired(pascale) -> not Curious(pascale)\nforall x (Alaskan(x) and Ocher(x) -> not Curious(x))\n\nnot Curious(ines)\n\nAlaskan(ines) and Alaskan(ines) -> Ocher(ines) -> therefore Ocher(ines) Alaskan(ines) and Ocher(ines) and forall x (Alaskan(x) and Ocher(x) -> not Curious(x)) -> therefore not Curious(ines)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Amalita is cute. Amalita is decorative. Amalita is ceramic. Amalita is riotous. Katey is made. Anthony is unwearying. Averill is unchanged. If Averill is unchanged then Averill is ceramic. If Katey is made and Katey is unwearying then Katey is not riotous. Big, ceramic people are not riotous. Averill is riotous.", "logic": "\nCute(amalita)\nDecorative(amalita)\nCeramic(amalita)\nRiotous(amalita)\nMade(katey)\nUnwearying(anthony)\nUnchanged(averill)\nUnchanged(averill) -> Ceramic(averill)\nMade(katey) and Unwearying(katey) -> not Riotous(katey)\nforall x (Unchanged(x) and Ceramic(x) -> not Riotous(x))\n\nRiotous(averill)\n\nUnchanged(averill) and Unchanged(averill) -> Ceramic(averill) -> therefore Ceramic(averill) Unchanged(averill) and Ceramic(averill) and forall x (Unchanged(x) and Ceramic(x) -> not Riotous(x)) -> therefore not Riotous(averill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Claresta is undulate. Claresta is needless. Claresta is calloused. Claresta is unavowed. Gaynor is scripted. Morna is empurpled. Flo is azido. If Flo is azido then Flo is calloused. If Gaynor is scripted and Gaynor is empurpled then Gaynor is not unavowed. Big, calloused people are not unavowed. Flo is not empurpled.", "logic": "\nUndulate(claresta)\nNeedless(claresta)\nCalloused(claresta)\nUnavowed(claresta)\nScripted(gaynor)\nEmpurpled(morna)\nAzido(flo)\nAzido(flo) -> Calloused(flo)\nScripted(gaynor) and Empurpled(gaynor) -> not Unavowed(gaynor)\nforall x (Azido(x) and Calloused(x) -> not Unavowed(x))\n\nnot Empurpled(flo)\n\nnot Empurpled(flo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Caron is innocent. Caron is shirty. Caron is custodial. Caron is visionary. Maurits is informal. Misha is anguished. Francene is autarchic. If Francene is autarchic then Francene is custodial. If Maurits is informal and Maurits is anguished then Maurits is not visionary. Big, custodial people are not visionary. Maurits is custodial.", "logic": "\nInnocent(caron)\nShirty(caron)\nCustodial(caron)\nVisionary(caron)\nInformal(maurits)\nAnguished(misha)\nAutarchic(francene)\nAutarchic(francene) -> Custodial(francene)\nInformal(maurits) and Anguished(maurits) -> not Visionary(maurits)\nforall x (Autarchic(x) and Custodial(x) -> not Visionary(x))\n\nCustodial(maurits)\n\nCustodial(maurits) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Rolph is unlobed. Rolph is appeasing. Rolph is demoniacal. Rolph is diarrheal. Cappella is lowbred. Karl is obscure. Ibrahim is unifacial. If Ibrahim is unifacial then Ibrahim is demoniacal. If Cappella is lowbred and Cappella is obscure then Cappella is not diarrheal. Big, demoniacal people are not diarrheal. Karl is not diarrheal.", "logic": "\nUnlobed(rolph)\nAppeasing(rolph)\nDemoniacal(rolph)\nDiarrheal(rolph)\nLowbred(cappella)\nObscure(karl)\nUnifacial(ibrahim)\nUnifacial(ibrahim) -> Demoniacal(ibrahim)\nLowbred(cappella) and Obscure(cappella) -> not Diarrheal(cappella)\nforall x (Unifacial(x) and Demoniacal(x) -> not Diarrheal(x))\n\nnot Diarrheal(karl)\n\nnot Diarrheal(karl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Kylila is ovarian. Kylila is columnar. Kylila is elfin. Kylila is divine. Jaclin is consummate. Siegfried is vaporized. Luana is marauding. If Luana is marauding then Luana is elfin. If Jaclin is consummate and Jaclin is vaporized then Jaclin is not divine. Big, elfin people are not divine. Siegfried is ovarian.", "logic": "\nOvarian(kylila)\nColumnar(kylila)\nElfin(kylila)\nDivine(kylila)\nConsummate(jaclin)\nVaporized(siegfried)\nMarauding(luana)\nMarauding(luana) -> Elfin(luana)\nConsummate(jaclin) and Vaporized(jaclin) -> not Divine(jaclin)\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Elfin(x) -> not Divine(x))\n\nOvarian(siegfried)\n\nOvarian(siegfried) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Sapphira is aberdonian. Sapphira is predacious. Sapphira is wobbling. Sapphira is permed. Abagail is caespitose. Hussein is citric. Hertha is pastel. If Hertha is pastel then Hertha is wobbling. If Abagail is caespitose and Abagail is citric then Abagail is not permed. Big, wobbling people are not permed. Abagail is not citric.", "logic": "\nAberdonian(sapphira)\nPredacious(sapphira)\nWobbling(sapphira)\nPermed(sapphira)\nCaespitose(abagail)\nCitric(hussein)\nPastel(hertha)\nPastel(hertha) -> Wobbling(hertha)\nCaespitose(abagail) and Citric(abagail) -> not Permed(abagail)\nforall x (Pastel(x) and Wobbling(x) -> not Permed(x))\n\nnot Citric(abagail)\n\nnot Citric(abagail) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Aloisia is eidetic. Aloisia is adaptive. Aloisia is lowbrow. Aloisia is whippy. Minni is astral. Verney is embodied. Allin is symphonic. If Allin is symphonic then Allin is lowbrow. If Minni is astral and Minni is embodied then Minni is not whippy. Big, lowbrow people are not whippy. Minni is whippy.", "logic": "\nEidetic(aloisia)\nAdaptive(aloisia)\nLowbrow(aloisia)\nWhippy(aloisia)\nAstral(minni)\nEmbodied(verney)\nSymphonic(allin)\nSymphonic(allin) -> Lowbrow(allin)\nAstral(minni) and Embodied(minni) -> not Whippy(minni)\nforall x (Symphonic(x) and Lowbrow(x) -> not Whippy(x))\n\nWhippy(minni)\n\nWhippy(minni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-242"} {"premises": "Yacov is sick. Yacov is auricular. Yacov is unfaceted. Yacov is biform. Yacov is mistaken. Yacov is motorised. Yacov is flowing. Brewer is auricular. Brewer is unfaceted. Brewer is biform. Brewer is mistaken. Brewer is flowing. Jeanine is unfaceted. Jeanine is mistaken. Jeanine is motorised. Green people are auricular. Young people are auricular. All mistaken, sick people are motorised. Red people are unfaceted. If someone is flowing and biform then they are unfaceted. If someone is biform then they are flowing. If someone is mistaken then they are flowing. Cold people are sick. Yacov is flowing.", "logic": "\nSick(yacov)\nAuricular(yacov)\nUnfaceted(yacov)\nBiform(yacov)\nMistaken(yacov)\nMotorised(yacov)\nFlowing(yacov)\nAuricular(brewer)\nUnfaceted(brewer)\nBiform(brewer)\nMistaken(brewer)\nFlowing(brewer)\nUnfaceted(jeanine)\nMistaken(jeanine)\nMotorised(jeanine)\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Auricular(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Auricular(x))\nforall x (Mistaken(x) and Sick(x) -> Motorised(x))\nforall x (Mistaken(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) and Biform(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Mistaken(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Auricular(x) -> Sick(x))\n\nFlowing(yacov)\n\ntherefore Flowing(yacov)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1274"} {"premises": "Garrott is uneconomic. Garrott is sauteed. Garrott is trackless. Garrott is taoist. Garrott is panoramic. Garrott is cachectic. Garrott is juvenile. Marmaduke is sauteed. Marmaduke is trackless. Marmaduke is taoist. Marmaduke is panoramic. Marmaduke is juvenile. Nita is trackless. Nita is panoramic. Nita is cachectic. Green people are sauteed. Young people are sauteed. All panoramic, uneconomic people are cachectic. Red people are trackless. If someone is juvenile and taoist then they are trackless. If someone is taoist then they are juvenile. If someone is panoramic then they are juvenile. Cold people are uneconomic. Garrott is not sauteed.", "logic": "\nUneconomic(garrott)\nSauteed(garrott)\nTrackless(garrott)\nTaoist(garrott)\nPanoramic(garrott)\nCachectic(garrott)\nJuvenile(garrott)\nSauteed(marmaduke)\nTrackless(marmaduke)\nTaoist(marmaduke)\nPanoramic(marmaduke)\nJuvenile(marmaduke)\nTrackless(nita)\nPanoramic(nita)\nCachectic(nita)\nforall x (Taoist(x) -> Sauteed(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) -> Sauteed(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) and Uneconomic(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) and Taoist(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) -> Juvenile(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) -> Juvenile(x))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\n\nnot Sauteed(garrott)\n\ntherefore Sauteed(garrott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1274"} {"premises": "Camilla is sure. Camilla is jumentous. Camilla is encrusted. Camilla is robustious. Camilla is hellish. Camilla is unkind. Camilla is calando. Melessa is jumentous. Melessa is encrusted. Melessa is robustious. Melessa is hellish. Melessa is calando. Manda is encrusted. Manda is hellish. Manda is unkind. Green people are jumentous. Young people are jumentous. All hellish, sure people are unkind. Red people are encrusted. If someone is calando and robustious then they are encrusted. If someone is robustious then they are calando. If someone is hellish then they are calando. Cold people are sure. Melessa is sure.", "logic": "\nSure(camilla)\nJumentous(camilla)\nEncrusted(camilla)\nRobustious(camilla)\nHellish(camilla)\nUnkind(camilla)\nCalando(camilla)\nJumentous(melessa)\nEncrusted(melessa)\nRobustious(melessa)\nHellish(melessa)\nCalando(melessa)\nEncrusted(manda)\nHellish(manda)\nUnkind(manda)\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Hellish(x) and Sure(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Hellish(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) and Robustious(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> Calando(x))\nforall x (Hellish(x) -> Calando(x))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) -> Sure(x))\n\nSure(melessa)\n\nJumentous(melessa) and forall x (Jumentous(x) -> Sure(x)) -> therefore Sure(melessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1274"} {"premises": "Jeremie is twiglike. Jeremie is stenosed. Jeremie is diffusing. Jeremie is thrilling. Jeremie is downwind. Jeremie is monoicous. Jeremie is agonising. Juanita is stenosed. Juanita is diffusing. Juanita is thrilling. Juanita is downwind. Juanita is agonising. Ali is diffusing. Ali is downwind. Ali is monoicous. Green people are stenosed. Young people are stenosed. All downwind, twiglike people are monoicous. Red people are diffusing. If someone is agonising and thrilling then they are diffusing. If someone is thrilling then they are agonising. If someone is downwind then they are agonising. Cold people are twiglike. Ali is not agonising.", "logic": "\nTwiglike(jeremie)\nStenosed(jeremie)\nDiffusing(jeremie)\nThrilling(jeremie)\nDownwind(jeremie)\nMonoicous(jeremie)\nAgonising(jeremie)\nStenosed(juanita)\nDiffusing(juanita)\nThrilling(juanita)\nDownwind(juanita)\nAgonising(juanita)\nDiffusing(ali)\nDownwind(ali)\nMonoicous(ali)\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Stenosed(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Stenosed(x))\nforall x (Downwind(x) and Twiglike(x) -> Monoicous(x))\nforall x (Downwind(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) and Thrilling(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Downwind(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Stenosed(x) -> Twiglike(x))\n\nnot Agonising(ali)\n\nDownwind(ali) and forall x (Downwind(x) -> Agonising(x)) -> therefore Agonising(ali)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1274"} {"premises": "Terrence is enhancive. Terrence is detailed. Terrence is perverted. Terrence is adient. Terrence is yearly. Terrence is firsthand. Terrence is datable. Marylinda is detailed. Marylinda is perverted. Marylinda is adient. Marylinda is yearly. Marylinda is datable. Jacinta is perverted. Jacinta is yearly. Jacinta is firsthand. Green people are detailed. Young people are detailed. All yearly, enhancive people are firsthand. Red people are perverted. If someone is datable and adient then they are perverted. If someone is adient then they are datable. If someone is yearly then they are datable. Cold people are enhancive. Jacinta is detailed.", "logic": "\nEnhancive(terrence)\nDetailed(terrence)\nPerverted(terrence)\nAdient(terrence)\nYearly(terrence)\nFirsthand(terrence)\nDatable(terrence)\nDetailed(marylinda)\nPerverted(marylinda)\nAdient(marylinda)\nYearly(marylinda)\nDatable(marylinda)\nPerverted(jacinta)\nYearly(jacinta)\nFirsthand(jacinta)\nforall x (Adient(x) -> Detailed(x))\nforall x (Datable(x) -> Detailed(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) and Enhancive(x) -> Firsthand(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Perverted(x))\nforall x (Datable(x) and Adient(x) -> Perverted(x))\nforall x (Adient(x) -> Datable(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Datable(x))\nforall x (Detailed(x) -> Enhancive(x))\n\nDetailed(jacinta)\n\nYearly(jacinta) and forall x (Yearly(x) -> Datable(x)) -> therefore Datable(jacinta) Datable(jacinta) and forall x (Datable(x) -> Detailed(x)) -> therefore Detailed(jacinta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1274"} {"premises": "Jeremie is blushful. Jeremie is considered. Jeremie is tensed. Jeremie is whacky. Jeremie is acetose. Jeremie is forficate. Jeremie is trifling. Morris is considered. Morris is tensed. Morris is whacky. Morris is acetose. Morris is trifling. Thaxter is tensed. Thaxter is acetose. Thaxter is forficate. Green people are considered. Young people are considered. All acetose, blushful people are forficate. Red people are tensed. If someone is trifling and whacky then they are tensed. If someone is whacky then they are trifling. If someone is acetose then they are trifling. Cold people are blushful. Thaxter is not considered.", "logic": "\nBlushful(jeremie)\nConsidered(jeremie)\nTensed(jeremie)\nWhacky(jeremie)\nAcetose(jeremie)\nForficate(jeremie)\nTrifling(jeremie)\nConsidered(morris)\nTensed(morris)\nWhacky(morris)\nAcetose(morris)\nTrifling(morris)\nTensed(thaxter)\nAcetose(thaxter)\nForficate(thaxter)\nforall x (Whacky(x) -> Considered(x))\nforall x (Trifling(x) -> Considered(x))\nforall x (Acetose(x) and Blushful(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Acetose(x) -> Tensed(x))\nforall x (Trifling(x) and Whacky(x) -> Tensed(x))\nforall x (Whacky(x) -> Trifling(x))\nforall x (Acetose(x) -> Trifling(x))\nforall x (Considered(x) -> Blushful(x))\n\nnot Considered(thaxter)\n\nAcetose(thaxter) and forall x (Acetose(x) -> Trifling(x)) -> therefore Trifling(thaxter) Trifling(thaxter) and forall x (Trifling(x) -> Considered(x)) -> therefore Considered(thaxter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1274"} {"premises": "The anabel is extradural. All extradural people are slicked. Young people are not obvious. Blue people are extradural. The anabel is extradural.", "logic": "\nExtradural(anabel)\nforall x (Extradural(x) -> Slicked(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) -> not Obvious(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Extradural(x))\n\nExtradural(anabel)\n\ntherefore Extradural(anabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The ardella is protecting. All protecting people are posted. Young people are not cupular. Blue people are protecting. The ardella is not protecting.", "logic": "\nProtecting(ardella)\nforall x (Protecting(x) -> Posted(x))\nforall x (Posted(x) -> not Cupular(x))\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> Protecting(x))\n\nnot Protecting(ardella)\n\ntherefore Protecting(ardella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The klara is acidic. All acidic people are sunbaked. Young people are not cognisable. Blue people are acidic. The klara is sunbaked.", "logic": "\nAcidic(klara)\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Sunbaked(x))\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) -> not Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) -> Acidic(x))\n\nSunbaked(klara)\n\nAcidic(klara) and forall x (Acidic(x) -> Sunbaked(x)) -> therefore Sunbaked(klara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The tamarra is warty. All warty people are dorsal. Young people are not fragmental. Blue people are warty. The tamarra is not dorsal.", "logic": "\nWarty(tamarra)\nforall x (Warty(x) -> Dorsal(x))\nforall x (Dorsal(x) -> not Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) -> Warty(x))\n\nnot Dorsal(tamarra)\n\nWarty(tamarra) and forall x (Warty(x) -> Dorsal(x)) -> therefore Dorsal(tamarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The bryana is unfit. All unfit people are sorry. Young people are not forfeit. Blue people are unfit. The bryana is not forfeit.", "logic": "\nUnfit(bryana)\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Sorry(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) -> not Forfeit(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) -> Unfit(x))\n\nnot Forfeit(bryana)\n\nUnfit(bryana) and forall x (Unfit(x) -> Sorry(x)) -> therefore Sorry(bryana) Sorry(bryana) and forall x (Sorry(x) -> not Forfeit(x)) -> therefore not Forfeit(bryana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The margarita is unaffixed. All unaffixed people are unpainted. Young people are not numinous. Blue people are unaffixed. The margarita is numinous.", "logic": "\nUnaffixed(margarita)\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) -> Unpainted(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> not Numinous(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\n\nNuminous(margarita)\n\nUnaffixed(margarita) and forall x (Unaffixed(x) -> Unpainted(x)) -> therefore Unpainted(margarita) Unpainted(margarita) and forall x (Unpainted(x) -> not Numinous(x)) -> therefore not Numinous(margarita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The athene is manic. All manic people are spruce. Young people are not paired. Blue people are manic. The athene is not nice.", "logic": "\nManic(athene)\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Spruce(x))\nforall x (Spruce(x) -> not Paired(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Manic(x))\n\nnot Nice(athene)\n\nnot Nice(athene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The guglielma is reductive. All reductive people are trochaic. Young people are not stuporous. Blue people are reductive. The guglielma chases the guglielma.", "logic": "\nReductive(guglielma)\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Trochaic(x))\nforall x (Trochaic(x) -> not Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) -> Reductive(x))\n\nChases(guglielma, guglielma)\n\nChases(guglielma, guglielma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The mirabelle is statute. All statute people are bardic. Young people are not moonlike. Blue people are statute. The mirabelle does not see the mirabelle.", "logic": "\nStatute(mirabelle)\nforall x (Statute(x) -> Bardic(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) -> not Moonlike(x))\nforall x (Moonlike(x) -> Statute(x))\n\nnot Sees(mirabelle, mirabelle)\n\nnot Sees(mirabelle, mirabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The erda is thracian. All thracian people are olden. Young people are not acritical. Blue people are thracian. The erda is rough.", "logic": "\nThracian(erda)\nforall x (Thracian(x) -> Olden(x))\nforall x (Olden(x) -> not Acritical(x))\nforall x (Acritical(x) -> Thracian(x))\n\nRough(erda)\n\nRough(erda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-62"} {"premises": "The myke duplicate the joey. The myke is fleet. The joey duplicate the myke. If something duplicate the myke then it isomerise the joey. If something isomerise the joey then the joey isomerise the myke. The myke duplicate the joey.", "logic": "\nDuplicate(myke, joey)\nFleet(myke)\nDuplicate(joey, myke)\nforall x (Duplicate(x, myke) -> Isomerise(x, joey))\nforall x (Isomerise(x, joey) -> Isomerise(joey, myke))\n\nDuplicate(myke, joey)\n\ntherefore Duplicate(myke, joey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The remus spot the bishop. The remus is preteen. The bishop spot the remus. If something spot the remus then it choose the bishop. If something choose the bishop then the bishop choose the remus. The remus is not preteen.", "logic": "\nSpot(remus, bishop)\nPreteen(remus)\nSpot(bishop, remus)\nforall x (Spot(x, remus) -> Choose(x, bishop))\nforall x (Choose(x, bishop) -> Choose(bishop, remus))\n\nnot Preteen(remus)\n\ntherefore Preteen(remus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The victor homologise the pier. The victor is stale. The pier homologise the victor. If something homologise the victor then it lapse the pier. If something lapse the pier then the pier lapse the victor. The pier lapse the pier.", "logic": "\nHomologise(victor, pier)\nStale(victor)\nHomologise(pier, victor)\nforall x (Homologise(x, victor) -> Lapse(x, pier))\nforall x (Lapse(x, pier) -> Lapse(pier, victor))\n\nLapse(pier, pier)\n\nHomologise(pier, victor) and forall x (Homologise(x, victor) -> Lapse(x, pier)) -> therefore Lapse(pier, pier)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The terencio miscall the fairfax. The terencio is adoptable. The fairfax miscall the terencio. If something miscall the terencio then it enfeoff the fairfax. If something enfeoff the fairfax then the fairfax enfeoff the terencio. The fairfax does not see the fairfax.", "logic": "\nMiscall(terencio, fairfax)\nAdoptable(terencio)\nMiscall(fairfax, terencio)\nforall x (Miscall(x, terencio) -> Enfeoff(x, fairfax))\nforall x (Enfeoff(x, fairfax) -> Enfeoff(fairfax, terencio))\n\nnot Enfeoff(fairfax, fairfax)\n\nMiscall(fairfax, terencio) and forall x (Miscall(x, terencio) -> Enfeoff(x, fairfax)) -> therefore Enfeoff(fairfax, fairfax)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The kaila undo the nomi. The kaila is bifacial. The nomi undo the kaila. If something undo the kaila then it uplift the nomi. If something uplift the nomi then the nomi uplift the kaila. The nomi uplift the kaila.", "logic": "\nUndo(kaila, nomi)\nBifacial(kaila)\nUndo(nomi, kaila)\nforall x (Undo(x, kaila) -> Uplift(x, nomi))\nforall x (Uplift(x, nomi) -> Uplift(nomi, kaila))\n\nUplift(nomi, kaila)\n\nUndo(nomi, kaila) and forall x (Undo(x, kaila) -> Uplift(x, nomi)) -> therefore Uplift(nomi, nomi) Uplift(nomi, nomi) and forall x (Uplift(x, nomi) -> Uplift(nomi, kaila)) -> therefore Uplift(nomi, kaila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The annadiane flour the barnard. The annadiane is mislaid. The barnard flour the annadiane. If something flour the annadiane then it acuminate the barnard. If something acuminate the barnard then the barnard acuminate the annadiane. The barnard does not see the annadiane.", "logic": "\nFlour(annadiane, barnard)\nMislaid(annadiane)\nFlour(barnard, annadiane)\nforall x (Flour(x, annadiane) -> Acuminate(x, barnard))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, barnard) -> Acuminate(barnard, annadiane))\n\nnot Acuminate(barnard, annadiane)\n\nFlour(barnard, annadiane) and forall x (Flour(x, annadiane) -> Acuminate(x, barnard)) -> therefore Acuminate(barnard, barnard) Acuminate(barnard, barnard) and forall x (Acuminate(x, barnard) -> Acuminate(barnard, annadiane)) -> therefore Acuminate(barnard, annadiane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The christen stigmatize the harvard. The christen is dished. The harvard stigmatize the christen. If something stigmatize the christen then it urticate the harvard. If something urticate the harvard then the harvard urticate the christen. The christen does not see the harvard.", "logic": "\nStigmatize(christen, harvard)\nDished(christen)\nStigmatize(harvard, christen)\nforall x (Stigmatize(x, christen) -> Urticate(x, harvard))\nforall x (Urticate(x, harvard) -> Urticate(harvard, christen))\n\nnot Urticate(christen, harvard)\n\nforall x (Stigmatize(x, christen) -> Urticate(x, harvard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The debbie mimeograph the consuelo. The debbie is drumhead. The consuelo mimeograph the debbie. If something mimeograph the debbie then it accredit the consuelo. If something accredit the consuelo then the consuelo accredit the debbie. The consuelo is red.", "logic": "\nMimeograph(debbie, consuelo)\nDrumhead(debbie)\nMimeograph(consuelo, debbie)\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, debbie) -> Accredit(x, consuelo))\nforall x (Accredit(x, consuelo) -> Accredit(consuelo, debbie))\n\nRed(consuelo)\n\nRed(consuelo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The walt unitize the sofia. The walt is anticlinal. The sofia unitize the walt. If something unitize the walt then it article the sofia. If something article the sofia then the sofia article the walt. The walt is not kind.", "logic": "\nUnitize(walt, sofia)\nAnticlinal(walt)\nUnitize(sofia, walt)\nforall x (Unitize(x, walt) -> Article(x, sofia))\nforall x (Article(x, sofia) -> Article(sofia, walt))\n\nnot Kind(walt)\n\nnot Kind(walt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The brock reimpose the fons. The brock is dioecian. The fons reimpose the brock. If something reimpose the brock then it flower the fons. If something flower the fons then the fons flower the brock. The brock is red.", "logic": "\nReimpose(brock, fons)\nDioecian(brock)\nReimpose(fons, brock)\nforall x (Reimpose(x, brock) -> Flower(x, fons))\nforall x (Flower(x, fons) -> Flower(fons, brock))\n\nRed(brock)\n\nRed(brock) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The tobe habilitate the bonnie. The tobe is outback. The bonnie habilitate the tobe. If something habilitate the tobe then it acetylate the bonnie. If something acetylate the bonnie then the bonnie acetylate the tobe. The bonnie is not kind.", "logic": "\nHabilitate(tobe, bonnie)\nOutback(tobe)\nHabilitate(bonnie, tobe)\nforall x (Habilitate(x, tobe) -> Acetylate(x, bonnie))\nforall x (Acetylate(x, bonnie) -> Acetylate(bonnie, tobe))\n\nnot Kind(bonnie)\n\nnot Kind(bonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "The elladine niggle the sashenka. The elladine is blooming. The sashenka niggle the elladine. If something niggle the elladine then it classicise the sashenka. If something classicise the sashenka then the sashenka classicise the elladine. The elladine classicise the elladine.", "logic": "\nNiggle(elladine, sashenka)\nBlooming(elladine)\nNiggle(sashenka, elladine)\nforall x (Niggle(x, elladine) -> Classicise(x, sashenka))\nforall x (Classicise(x, sashenka) -> Classicise(sashenka, elladine))\n\nClassicise(elladine, elladine)\n\nClassicise(elladine, elladine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1252"} {"premises": "Tamma is succinct. Alfreda is churchly. Cold, succinct people are disposable. All succinct people are cuddly. Tamma is succinct.", "logic": "\nSuccinct(tamma)\nChurchly(alfreda)\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and Succinct(x) -> Disposable(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Cuddly(x))\n\nSuccinct(tamma)\n\ntherefore Succinct(tamma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Perl is astute. Sumner is respectful. Cold, astute people are jelled. All astute people are frontmost. Sumner is not respectful.", "logic": "\nAstute(perl)\nRespectful(sumner)\nforall x (Frontmost(x) and Astute(x) -> Jelled(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) -> Frontmost(x))\n\nnot Respectful(sumner)\n\ntherefore Respectful(sumner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Spense is reasoned. Collins is succinic. Cold, reasoned people are awakened. All reasoned people are nuts. Spense is nuts.", "logic": "\nReasoned(spense)\nSuccinic(collins)\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Awakened(x))\nforall x (Reasoned(x) -> Nuts(x))\n\nNuts(spense)\n\nReasoned(spense) and forall x (Reasoned(x) -> Nuts(x)) -> therefore Nuts(spense)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Valina is puppyish. Karl is coronary. Cold, puppyish people are ignitible. All puppyish people are boss. Valina is not boss.", "logic": "\nPuppyish(valina)\nCoronary(karl)\nforall x (Boss(x) and Puppyish(x) -> Ignitible(x))\nforall x (Puppyish(x) -> Boss(x))\n\nnot Boss(valina)\n\nPuppyish(valina) and forall x (Puppyish(x) -> Boss(x)) -> therefore Boss(valina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Phyllis is mercerised. Rahul is repressing. Cold, mercerised people are thrilled. All mercerised people are callable. Phyllis is thrilled.", "logic": "\nMercerised(phyllis)\nRepressing(rahul)\nforall x (Callable(x) and Mercerised(x) -> Thrilled(x))\nforall x (Mercerised(x) -> Callable(x))\n\nThrilled(phyllis)\n\nMercerised(phyllis) and forall x (Mercerised(x) -> Callable(x)) -> therefore Callable(phyllis) Callable(phyllis) and Mercerised(phyllis) and forall x (Callable(x) and Mercerised(x) -> Thrilled(x)) -> therefore Thrilled(phyllis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Frederich is nuts. Heather is secure. Cold, nuts people are persian. All nuts people are shiftless. Frederich is not persian.", "logic": "\nNuts(frederich)\nSecure(heather)\nforall x (Shiftless(x) and Nuts(x) -> Persian(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Shiftless(x))\n\nnot Persian(frederich)\n\nNuts(frederich) and forall x (Nuts(x) -> Shiftless(x)) -> therefore Shiftless(frederich) Shiftless(frederich) and Nuts(frederich) and forall x (Shiftless(x) and Nuts(x) -> Persian(x)) -> therefore Persian(frederich)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Teryl is hispid. Rand is biracial. Cold, hispid people are dextrous. All hispid people are lanceolate. Rand is not lanceolate.", "logic": "\nHispid(teryl)\nBiracial(rand)\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) and Hispid(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Lanceolate(x))\n\nnot Lanceolate(rand)\n\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Lanceolate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Uli is valiant. Rosalyn is capped. Cold, valiant people are sedative. All valiant people are oneiric. Rosalyn is sedative.", "logic": "\nValiant(uli)\nCapped(rosalyn)\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Valiant(x) -> Sedative(x))\nforall x (Valiant(x) -> Oneiric(x))\n\nSedative(rosalyn)\n\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Valiant(x) -> Sedative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Dominica is brindled. Terrianne is midweekly. Cold, brindled people are bosomed. All brindled people are trim. Dominica is not furry.", "logic": "\nBrindled(dominica)\nMidweekly(terrianne)\nforall x (Trim(x) and Brindled(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Brindled(x) -> Trim(x))\n\nnot Furry(dominica)\n\nnot Furry(dominica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Garfinkel is fisheye. Brynne is rostrate. Cold, fisheye people are sloping. All fisheye people are kinglike. Brynne is quiet.", "logic": "\nFisheye(garfinkel)\nRostrate(brynne)\nforall x (Kinglike(x) and Fisheye(x) -> Sloping(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Kinglike(x))\n\nQuiet(brynne)\n\nQuiet(brynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Carolan is premiere. Amber is naming. Cold, premiere people are prudential. All premiere people are garbled. Carolan is not quiet.", "logic": "\nPremiere(carolan)\nNaming(amber)\nforall x (Garbled(x) and Premiere(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Premiere(x) -> Garbled(x))\n\nnot Quiet(carolan)\n\nnot Quiet(carolan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "Layla is verifiable. Sibley is healthier. Cold, verifiable people are hourlong. All verifiable people are stenotic. Sibley is verifiable.", "logic": "\nVerifiable(layla)\nHealthier(sibley)\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and Verifiable(x) -> Hourlong(x))\nforall x (Verifiable(x) -> Stenotic(x))\n\nVerifiable(sibley)\n\nVerifiable(sibley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1192"} {"premises": "The neddy aphorize the lillian. The neddy gluttonize the loren. The loren is adaxial. The loren cabbage the neddy. The loren aphorize the neddy. The lillian is flagitious. The lillian is gangly. The lillian is marketable. The lillian is gnostic. The lillian cabbage the neddy. The lillian aphorize the neddy. The lillian gluttonize the neddy. If something cabbage the neddy then it is adaxial. If something is gangly and it gluttonize the lillian then the lillian gluttonize the neddy. If something aphorize the neddy and it gluttonize the neddy then the neddy gluttonize the lillian. If something aphorize the neddy and the neddy is adaxial then the neddy is marketable. If the neddy cabbage the lillian and the neddy aphorize the loren then the lillian is marketable. If something gluttonize the neddy and the neddy gluttonize the lillian then the neddy is marketable. The lillian cabbage the neddy.", "logic": "\nAphorize(neddy, lillian)\nGluttonize(neddy, loren)\nAdaxial(loren)\nCabbage(loren, neddy)\nAphorize(loren, neddy)\nFlagitious(lillian)\nGangly(lillian)\nMarketable(lillian)\nGnostic(lillian)\nCabbage(lillian, neddy)\nAphorize(lillian, neddy)\nGluttonize(lillian, neddy)\nforall x (Cabbage(x, neddy) -> Adaxial(x))\nforall x (Gangly(x) and Gluttonize(x, lillian) -> Gluttonize(lillian, neddy))\nforall x (Aphorize(x, neddy) and Gluttonize(x, neddy) -> Gluttonize(neddy, lillian))\nforall x (Aphorize(x, neddy) and Adaxial(neddy) -> Marketable(neddy))\nCabbage(neddy, lillian) and Aphorize(neddy, loren) -> Marketable(lillian)\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, neddy) and Gluttonize(neddy, lillian) -> Marketable(neddy))\n\nCabbage(lillian, neddy)\n\ntherefore Cabbage(lillian, neddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The nadia shlep the elysha. The nadia allege the catherine. The catherine is leading. The catherine darn the nadia. The catherine shlep the nadia. The elysha is illusive. The elysha is bimetallic. The elysha is styptic. The elysha is pitiless. The elysha darn the nadia. The elysha shlep the nadia. The elysha allege the nadia. If something darn the nadia then it is leading. If something is bimetallic and it allege the elysha then the elysha allege the nadia. If something shlep the nadia and it allege the nadia then the nadia allege the elysha. If something shlep the nadia and the nadia is leading then the nadia is styptic. If the nadia darn the elysha and the nadia shlep the catherine then the elysha is styptic. If something allege the nadia and the nadia allege the elysha then the nadia is styptic. The elysha is not pitiless.", "logic": "\nShlep(nadia, elysha)\nAllege(nadia, catherine)\nLeading(catherine)\nDarn(catherine, nadia)\nShlep(catherine, nadia)\nIllusive(elysha)\nBimetallic(elysha)\nStyptic(elysha)\nPitiless(elysha)\nDarn(elysha, nadia)\nShlep(elysha, nadia)\nAllege(elysha, nadia)\nforall x (Darn(x, nadia) -> Leading(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and Allege(x, elysha) -> Allege(elysha, nadia))\nforall x (Shlep(x, nadia) and Allege(x, nadia) -> Allege(nadia, elysha))\nforall x (Shlep(x, nadia) and Leading(nadia) -> Styptic(nadia))\nDarn(nadia, elysha) and Shlep(nadia, catherine) -> Styptic(elysha)\nforall x (Allege(x, nadia) and Allege(nadia, elysha) -> Styptic(nadia))\n\nnot Pitiless(elysha)\n\ntherefore Pitiless(elysha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The mira premiss the bria. The mira auspicate the kristian. The kristian is zonal. The kristian burnish the mira. The kristian premiss the mira. The bria is maidenly. The bria is abortive. The bria is ductile. The bria is ignorant. The bria burnish the mira. The bria premiss the mira. The bria auspicate the mira. If something burnish the mira then it is zonal. If something is abortive and it auspicate the bria then the bria auspicate the mira. If something premiss the mira and it auspicate the mira then the mira auspicate the bria. If something premiss the mira and the mira is zonal then the mira is ductile. If the mira burnish the bria and the mira premiss the kristian then the bria is ductile. If something auspicate the mira and the mira auspicate the bria then the mira is ductile. The mira auspicate the bria.", "logic": "\nPremiss(mira, bria)\nAuspicate(mira, kristian)\nZonal(kristian)\nBurnish(kristian, mira)\nPremiss(kristian, mira)\nMaidenly(bria)\nAbortive(bria)\nDuctile(bria)\nIgnorant(bria)\nBurnish(bria, mira)\nPremiss(bria, mira)\nAuspicate(bria, mira)\nforall x (Burnish(x, mira) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Abortive(x) and Auspicate(x, bria) -> Auspicate(bria, mira))\nforall x (Premiss(x, mira) and Auspicate(x, mira) -> Auspicate(mira, bria))\nforall x (Premiss(x, mira) and Zonal(mira) -> Ductile(mira))\nBurnish(mira, bria) and Premiss(mira, kristian) -> Ductile(bria)\nforall x (Auspicate(x, mira) and Auspicate(mira, bria) -> Ductile(mira))\n\nAuspicate(mira, bria)\n\nPremiss(bria, mira) and Auspicate(bria, mira) and forall x (Premiss(x, mira) and Auspicate(x, mira) -> Auspicate(mira, bria)) -> therefore Auspicate(mira, bria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The broderick revive the valaria. The broderick percolate the dory. The dory is evidenced. The dory cannulate the broderick. The dory revive the broderick. The valaria is undressed. The valaria is contrary. The valaria is cultivable. The valaria is saxatile. The valaria cannulate the broderick. The valaria revive the broderick. The valaria percolate the broderick. If something cannulate the broderick then it is evidenced. If something is contrary and it percolate the valaria then the valaria percolate the broderick. If something revive the broderick and it percolate the broderick then the broderick percolate the valaria. If something revive the broderick and the broderick is evidenced then the broderick is cultivable. If the broderick cannulate the valaria and the broderick revive the dory then the valaria is cultivable. If something percolate the broderick and the broderick percolate the valaria then the broderick is cultivable. The broderick does not see the valaria.", "logic": "\nRevive(broderick, valaria)\nPercolate(broderick, dory)\nEvidenced(dory)\nCannulate(dory, broderick)\nRevive(dory, broderick)\nUndressed(valaria)\nContrary(valaria)\nCultivable(valaria)\nSaxatile(valaria)\nCannulate(valaria, broderick)\nRevive(valaria, broderick)\nPercolate(valaria, broderick)\nforall x (Cannulate(x, broderick) -> Evidenced(x))\nforall x (Contrary(x) and Percolate(x, valaria) -> Percolate(valaria, broderick))\nforall x (Revive(x, broderick) and Percolate(x, broderick) -> Percolate(broderick, valaria))\nforall x (Revive(x, broderick) and Evidenced(broderick) -> Cultivable(broderick))\nCannulate(broderick, valaria) and Revive(broderick, dory) -> Cultivable(valaria)\nforall x (Percolate(x, broderick) and Percolate(broderick, valaria) -> Cultivable(broderick))\n\nnot Percolate(broderick, valaria)\n\nRevive(valaria, broderick) and Percolate(valaria, broderick) and forall x (Revive(x, broderick) and Percolate(x, broderick) -> Percolate(broderick, valaria)) -> therefore Percolate(broderick, valaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The cornelia bullyrag the lesli. The cornelia birle the spense. The spense is unploughed. The spense despise the cornelia. The spense bullyrag the cornelia. The lesli is sacerdotal. The lesli is double. The lesli is unheralded. The lesli is unflavored. The lesli despise the cornelia. The lesli bullyrag the cornelia. The lesli birle the cornelia. If something despise the cornelia then it is unploughed. If something is double and it birle the lesli then the lesli birle the cornelia. If something bullyrag the cornelia and it birle the cornelia then the cornelia birle the lesli. If something bullyrag the cornelia and the cornelia is unploughed then the cornelia is unheralded. If the cornelia despise the lesli and the cornelia bullyrag the spense then the lesli is unheralded. If something birle the cornelia and the cornelia birle the lesli then the cornelia is unheralded. The cornelia is unheralded.", "logic": "\nBullyrag(cornelia, lesli)\nBirle(cornelia, spense)\nUnploughed(spense)\nDespise(spense, cornelia)\nBullyrag(spense, cornelia)\nSacerdotal(lesli)\nDouble(lesli)\nUnheralded(lesli)\nUnflavored(lesli)\nDespise(lesli, cornelia)\nBullyrag(lesli, cornelia)\nBirle(lesli, cornelia)\nforall x (Despise(x, cornelia) -> Unploughed(x))\nforall x (Double(x) and Birle(x, lesli) -> Birle(lesli, cornelia))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, cornelia) and Birle(x, cornelia) -> Birle(cornelia, lesli))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, cornelia) and Unploughed(cornelia) -> Unheralded(cornelia))\nDespise(cornelia, lesli) and Bullyrag(cornelia, spense) -> Unheralded(lesli)\nforall x (Birle(x, cornelia) and Birle(cornelia, lesli) -> Unheralded(cornelia))\n\nUnheralded(cornelia)\n\nBullyrag(lesli, cornelia) and Birle(lesli, cornelia) and forall x (Bullyrag(x, cornelia) and Birle(x, cornelia) -> Birle(cornelia, lesli)) -> therefore Birle(cornelia, lesli) Birle(lesli, cornelia) and Birle(cornelia, lesli) and forall x (Birle(x, cornelia) and Birle(cornelia, lesli) -> Unheralded(cornelia)) -> therefore Unheralded(cornelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The barron jewel the alyse. The barron assent the lilia. The lilia is volitional. The lilia polish the barron. The lilia jewel the barron. The alyse is mammalian. The alyse is asternal. The alyse is plethoric. The alyse is unsociable. The alyse polish the barron. The alyse jewel the barron. The alyse assent the barron. If something polish the barron then it is volitional. If something is asternal and it assent the alyse then the alyse assent the barron. If something jewel the barron and it assent the barron then the barron assent the alyse. If something jewel the barron and the barron is volitional then the barron is plethoric. If the barron polish the alyse and the barron jewel the lilia then the alyse is plethoric. If something assent the barron and the barron assent the alyse then the barron is plethoric. The barron is not plethoric.", "logic": "\nJewel(barron, alyse)\nAssent(barron, lilia)\nVolitional(lilia)\nPolish(lilia, barron)\nJewel(lilia, barron)\nMammalian(alyse)\nAsternal(alyse)\nPlethoric(alyse)\nUnsociable(alyse)\nPolish(alyse, barron)\nJewel(alyse, barron)\nAssent(alyse, barron)\nforall x (Polish(x, barron) -> Volitional(x))\nforall x (Asternal(x) and Assent(x, alyse) -> Assent(alyse, barron))\nforall x (Jewel(x, barron) and Assent(x, barron) -> Assent(barron, alyse))\nforall x (Jewel(x, barron) and Volitional(barron) -> Plethoric(barron))\nPolish(barron, alyse) and Jewel(barron, lilia) -> Plethoric(alyse)\nforall x (Assent(x, barron) and Assent(barron, alyse) -> Plethoric(barron))\n\nnot Plethoric(barron)\n\nJewel(alyse, barron) and Assent(alyse, barron) and forall x (Jewel(x, barron) and Assent(x, barron) -> Assent(barron, alyse)) -> therefore Assent(barron, alyse) Assent(alyse, barron) and Assent(barron, alyse) and forall x (Assent(x, barron) and Assent(barron, alyse) -> Plethoric(barron)) -> therefore Plethoric(barron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The deonne necrose the alisa. The deonne outweigh the laurice. The laurice is hebraical. The laurice moisturize the deonne. The laurice necrose the deonne. The alisa is snappy. The alisa is hick. The alisa is sluicing. The alisa is rushy. The alisa moisturize the deonne. The alisa necrose the deonne. The alisa outweigh the deonne. If something moisturize the deonne then it is hebraical. If something is hick and it outweigh the alisa then the alisa outweigh the deonne. If something necrose the deonne and it outweigh the deonne then the deonne outweigh the alisa. If something necrose the deonne and the deonne is hebraical then the deonne is sluicing. If the deonne moisturize the alisa and the deonne necrose the laurice then the alisa is sluicing. If something outweigh the deonne and the deonne outweigh the alisa then the deonne is sluicing. The deonne is not hebraical.", "logic": "\nNecrose(deonne, alisa)\nOutweigh(deonne, laurice)\nHebraical(laurice)\nMoisturize(laurice, deonne)\nNecrose(laurice, deonne)\nSnappy(alisa)\nHick(alisa)\nSluicing(alisa)\nRushy(alisa)\nMoisturize(alisa, deonne)\nNecrose(alisa, deonne)\nOutweigh(alisa, deonne)\nforall x (Moisturize(x, deonne) -> Hebraical(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) and Outweigh(x, alisa) -> Outweigh(alisa, deonne))\nforall x (Necrose(x, deonne) and Outweigh(x, deonne) -> Outweigh(deonne, alisa))\nforall x (Necrose(x, deonne) and Hebraical(deonne) -> Sluicing(deonne))\nMoisturize(deonne, alisa) and Necrose(deonne, laurice) -> Sluicing(alisa)\nforall x (Outweigh(x, deonne) and Outweigh(deonne, alisa) -> Sluicing(deonne))\n\nnot Hebraical(deonne)\n\nforall x (Moisturize(x, deonne) -> Hebraical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The marge polychrome the geraldina. The marge alligator the teddy. The teddy is unraised. The teddy matter the marge. The teddy polychrome the marge. The geraldina is unseeded. The geraldina is unsigned. The geraldina is related. The geraldina is drinkable. The geraldina matter the marge. The geraldina polychrome the marge. The geraldina alligator the marge. If something matter the marge then it is unraised. If something is unsigned and it alligator the geraldina then the geraldina alligator the marge. If something polychrome the marge and it alligator the marge then the marge alligator the geraldina. If something polychrome the marge and the marge is unraised then the marge is related. If the marge matter the geraldina and the marge polychrome the teddy then the geraldina is related. If something alligator the marge and the marge alligator the geraldina then the marge is related. The teddy is unseeded.", "logic": "\nPolychrome(marge, geraldina)\nAlligator(marge, teddy)\nUnraised(teddy)\nMatter(teddy, marge)\nPolychrome(teddy, marge)\nUnseeded(geraldina)\nUnsigned(geraldina)\nRelated(geraldina)\nDrinkable(geraldina)\nMatter(geraldina, marge)\nPolychrome(geraldina, marge)\nAlligator(geraldina, marge)\nforall x (Matter(x, marge) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Unsigned(x) and Alligator(x, geraldina) -> Alligator(geraldina, marge))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, marge) and Alligator(x, marge) -> Alligator(marge, geraldina))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, marge) and Unraised(marge) -> Related(marge))\nMatter(marge, geraldina) and Polychrome(marge, teddy) -> Related(geraldina)\nforall x (Alligator(x, marge) and Alligator(marge, geraldina) -> Related(marge))\n\nUnseeded(teddy)\n\nUnseeded(teddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The laurianne chondrify the arly. The laurianne rouge the emilie. The emilie is fuscous. The emilie spritz the laurianne. The emilie chondrify the laurianne. The arly is following. The arly is corbelled. The arly is hopeless. The arly is arteriolar. The arly spritz the laurianne. The arly chondrify the laurianne. The arly rouge the laurianne. If something spritz the laurianne then it is fuscous. If something is corbelled and it rouge the arly then the arly rouge the laurianne. If something chondrify the laurianne and it rouge the laurianne then the laurianne rouge the arly. If something chondrify the laurianne and the laurianne is fuscous then the laurianne is hopeless. If the laurianne spritz the arly and the laurianne chondrify the emilie then the arly is hopeless. If something rouge the laurianne and the laurianne rouge the arly then the laurianne is hopeless. The arly does not need the arly.", "logic": "\nChondrify(laurianne, arly)\nRouge(laurianne, emilie)\nFuscous(emilie)\nSpritz(emilie, laurianne)\nChondrify(emilie, laurianne)\nFollowing(arly)\nCorbelled(arly)\nHopeless(arly)\nArteriolar(arly)\nSpritz(arly, laurianne)\nChondrify(arly, laurianne)\nRouge(arly, laurianne)\nforall x (Spritz(x, laurianne) -> Fuscous(x))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) and Rouge(x, arly) -> Rouge(arly, laurianne))\nforall x (Chondrify(x, laurianne) and Rouge(x, laurianne) -> Rouge(laurianne, arly))\nforall x (Chondrify(x, laurianne) and Fuscous(laurianne) -> Hopeless(laurianne))\nSpritz(laurianne, arly) and Chondrify(laurianne, emilie) -> Hopeless(arly)\nforall x (Rouge(x, laurianne) and Rouge(laurianne, arly) -> Hopeless(laurianne))\n\nnot Chondrify(arly, arly)\n\nnot Chondrify(arly, arly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The lory tussle the loella. The lory initialize the fred. The fred is apophyseal. The fred epilate the lory. The fred tussle the lory. The loella is untracked. The loella is chatty. The loella is yucky. The loella is fortuitous. The loella epilate the lory. The loella tussle the lory. The loella initialize the lory. If something epilate the lory then it is apophyseal. If something is chatty and it initialize the loella then the loella initialize the lory. If something tussle the lory and it initialize the lory then the lory initialize the loella. If something tussle the lory and the lory is apophyseal then the lory is yucky. If the lory epilate the loella and the lory tussle the fred then the loella is yucky. If something initialize the lory and the lory initialize the loella then the lory is yucky. The loella initialize the loella.", "logic": "\nTussle(lory, loella)\nInitialize(lory, fred)\nApophyseal(fred)\nEpilate(fred, lory)\nTussle(fred, lory)\nUntracked(loella)\nChatty(loella)\nYucky(loella)\nFortuitous(loella)\nEpilate(loella, lory)\nTussle(loella, lory)\nInitialize(loella, lory)\nforall x (Epilate(x, lory) -> Apophyseal(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) and Initialize(x, loella) -> Initialize(loella, lory))\nforall x (Tussle(x, lory) and Initialize(x, lory) -> Initialize(lory, loella))\nforall x (Tussle(x, lory) and Apophyseal(lory) -> Yucky(lory))\nEpilate(lory, loella) and Tussle(lory, fred) -> Yucky(loella)\nforall x (Initialize(x, lory) and Initialize(lory, loella) -> Yucky(lory))\n\nInitialize(loella, loella)\n\nInitialize(loella, loella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The kayle submarine the antonina. The kayle aphorise the nollie. The nollie is albinotic. The nollie vouch the kayle. The nollie submarine the kayle. The antonina is last. The antonina is curtained. The antonina is vesicatory. The antonina is plumlike. The antonina vouch the kayle. The antonina submarine the kayle. The antonina aphorise the kayle. If something vouch the kayle then it is albinotic. If something is curtained and it aphorise the antonina then the antonina aphorise the kayle. If something submarine the kayle and it aphorise the kayle then the kayle aphorise the antonina. If something submarine the kayle and the kayle is albinotic then the kayle is vesicatory. If the kayle vouch the antonina and the kayle submarine the nollie then the antonina is vesicatory. If something aphorise the kayle and the kayle aphorise the antonina then the kayle is vesicatory. The nollie does not see the antonina.", "logic": "\nSubmarine(kayle, antonina)\nAphorise(kayle, nollie)\nAlbinotic(nollie)\nVouch(nollie, kayle)\nSubmarine(nollie, kayle)\nLast(antonina)\nCurtained(antonina)\nVesicatory(antonina)\nPlumlike(antonina)\nVouch(antonina, kayle)\nSubmarine(antonina, kayle)\nAphorise(antonina, kayle)\nforall x (Vouch(x, kayle) -> Albinotic(x))\nforall x (Curtained(x) and Aphorise(x, antonina) -> Aphorise(antonina, kayle))\nforall x (Submarine(x, kayle) and Aphorise(x, kayle) -> Aphorise(kayle, antonina))\nforall x (Submarine(x, kayle) and Albinotic(kayle) -> Vesicatory(kayle))\nVouch(kayle, antonina) and Submarine(kayle, nollie) -> Vesicatory(antonina)\nforall x (Aphorise(x, kayle) and Aphorise(kayle, antonina) -> Vesicatory(kayle))\n\nnot Aphorise(nollie, antonina)\n\nnot Aphorise(nollie, antonina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The mabelle dissever the lynnelle. The mabelle flock the alanna. The alanna is endogamic. The alanna succeed the mabelle. The alanna dissever the mabelle. The lynnelle is unbleached. The lynnelle is campy. The lynnelle is despicable. The lynnelle is garmented. The lynnelle succeed the mabelle. The lynnelle dissever the mabelle. The lynnelle flock the mabelle. If something succeed the mabelle then it is endogamic. If something is campy and it flock the lynnelle then the lynnelle flock the mabelle. If something dissever the mabelle and it flock the mabelle then the mabelle flock the lynnelle. If something dissever the mabelle and the mabelle is endogamic then the mabelle is despicable. If the mabelle succeed the lynnelle and the mabelle dissever the alanna then the lynnelle is despicable. If something flock the mabelle and the mabelle flock the lynnelle then the mabelle is despicable. The alanna flock the alanna.", "logic": "\nDissever(mabelle, lynnelle)\nFlock(mabelle, alanna)\nEndogamic(alanna)\nSucceed(alanna, mabelle)\nDissever(alanna, mabelle)\nUnbleached(lynnelle)\nCampy(lynnelle)\nDespicable(lynnelle)\nGarmented(lynnelle)\nSucceed(lynnelle, mabelle)\nDissever(lynnelle, mabelle)\nFlock(lynnelle, mabelle)\nforall x (Succeed(x, mabelle) -> Endogamic(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) and Flock(x, lynnelle) -> Flock(lynnelle, mabelle))\nforall x (Dissever(x, mabelle) and Flock(x, mabelle) -> Flock(mabelle, lynnelle))\nforall x (Dissever(x, mabelle) and Endogamic(mabelle) -> Despicable(mabelle))\nSucceed(mabelle, lynnelle) and Dissever(mabelle, alanna) -> Despicable(lynnelle)\nforall x (Flock(x, mabelle) and Flock(mabelle, lynnelle) -> Despicable(mabelle))\n\nFlock(alanna, alanna)\n\nFlock(alanna, alanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1876"} {"premises": "The roselia coil the garv. The roselia is accustomed. The roselia prologise the modestine. The roselia prologise the garv. The roselia glamourise the modestine. The modestine is ductile. The modestine is soaring. The modestine glamourise the roselia. The garv is soaring. The garv prologise the roselia. The garv prologise the modestine. The garv glamourise the modestine. Rough things are dastardly. If something prologise the roselia and the roselia prologise the garv then the roselia is soaring. If something coil the garv and the garv glamourise the roselia then it coil the roselia. If something coil the garv and it glamourise the roselia then the roselia prologise the garv. If something prologise the modestine then the modestine prologise the roselia. If something prologise the roselia then the roselia is liege. The modestine is ductile.", "logic": "\nCoil(roselia, garv)\nAccustomed(roselia)\nPrologise(roselia, modestine)\nPrologise(roselia, garv)\nGlamourise(roselia, modestine)\nDuctile(modestine)\nSoaring(modestine)\nGlamourise(modestine, roselia)\nSoaring(garv)\nPrologise(garv, roselia)\nPrologise(garv, modestine)\nGlamourise(garv, modestine)\nforall x (Liege(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Prologise(x, roselia) and Prologise(roselia, garv) -> Soaring(roselia))\nforall x (Coil(x, garv) and Glamourise(garv, roselia) -> Coil(x, roselia))\nforall x (Coil(x, garv) and Glamourise(x, roselia) -> Prologise(roselia, garv))\nforall x (Prologise(x, modestine) -> Prologise(modestine, roselia))\nforall x (Prologise(x, roselia) -> Liege(roselia))\n\nDuctile(modestine)\n\ntherefore Ductile(modestine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The rolfe compere the cinda. The rolfe is catholic. The rolfe sanitize the evelina. The rolfe sanitize the cinda. The rolfe osculate the evelina. The evelina is unsheared. The evelina is alloyed. The evelina osculate the rolfe. The cinda is alloyed. The cinda sanitize the rolfe. The cinda sanitize the evelina. The cinda osculate the evelina. Rough things are tabby. If something sanitize the rolfe and the rolfe sanitize the cinda then the rolfe is alloyed. If something compere the cinda and the cinda osculate the rolfe then it compere the rolfe. If something compere the cinda and it osculate the rolfe then the rolfe sanitize the cinda. If something sanitize the evelina then the evelina sanitize the rolfe. If something sanitize the rolfe then the rolfe is magnetized. The cinda does not like the rolfe.", "logic": "\nCompere(rolfe, cinda)\nCatholic(rolfe)\nSanitize(rolfe, evelina)\nSanitize(rolfe, cinda)\nOsculate(rolfe, evelina)\nUnsheared(evelina)\nAlloyed(evelina)\nOsculate(evelina, rolfe)\nAlloyed(cinda)\nSanitize(cinda, rolfe)\nSanitize(cinda, evelina)\nOsculate(cinda, evelina)\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Tabby(x))\nforall x (Sanitize(x, rolfe) and Sanitize(rolfe, cinda) -> Alloyed(rolfe))\nforall x (Compere(x, cinda) and Osculate(cinda, rolfe) -> Compere(x, rolfe))\nforall x (Compere(x, cinda) and Osculate(x, rolfe) -> Sanitize(rolfe, cinda))\nforall x (Sanitize(x, evelina) -> Sanitize(evelina, rolfe))\nforall x (Sanitize(x, rolfe) -> Magnetized(rolfe))\n\nnot Sanitize(cinda, rolfe)\n\ntherefore Sanitize(cinda, rolfe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The anatola luge the delaney. The anatola is fiduciary. The anatola aluminize the vick. The anatola aluminize the delaney. The anatola conserve the vick. The vick is blinded. The vick is exegetical. The vick conserve the anatola. The delaney is exegetical. The delaney aluminize the anatola. The delaney aluminize the vick. The delaney conserve the vick. Rough things are curable. If something aluminize the anatola and the anatola aluminize the delaney then the anatola is exegetical. If something luge the delaney and the delaney conserve the anatola then it luge the anatola. If something luge the delaney and it conserve the anatola then the anatola aluminize the delaney. If something aluminize the vick then the vick aluminize the anatola. If something aluminize the anatola then the anatola is coinciding. The anatola is coinciding.", "logic": "\nLuge(anatola, delaney)\nFiduciary(anatola)\nAluminize(anatola, vick)\nAluminize(anatola, delaney)\nConserve(anatola, vick)\nBlinded(vick)\nExegetical(vick)\nConserve(vick, anatola)\nExegetical(delaney)\nAluminize(delaney, anatola)\nAluminize(delaney, vick)\nConserve(delaney, vick)\nforall x (Coinciding(x) -> Curable(x))\nforall x (Aluminize(x, anatola) and Aluminize(anatola, delaney) -> Exegetical(anatola))\nforall x (Luge(x, delaney) and Conserve(delaney, anatola) -> Luge(x, anatola))\nforall x (Luge(x, delaney) and Conserve(x, anatola) -> Aluminize(anatola, delaney))\nforall x (Aluminize(x, vick) -> Aluminize(vick, anatola))\nforall x (Aluminize(x, anatola) -> Coinciding(anatola))\n\nCoinciding(anatola)\n\nAluminize(delaney, anatola) and forall x (Aluminize(x, anatola) -> Coinciding(anatola)) -> therefore Coinciding(anatola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The willette leech the dorrie. The willette is dysgenic. The willette legalize the hesther. The willette legalize the dorrie. The willette quote the hesther. The hesther is grisly. The hesther is thrillful. The hesther quote the willette. The dorrie is thrillful. The dorrie legalize the willette. The dorrie legalize the hesther. The dorrie quote the hesther. Rough things are javanese. If something legalize the willette and the willette legalize the dorrie then the willette is thrillful. If something leech the dorrie and the dorrie quote the willette then it leech the willette. If something leech the dorrie and it quote the willette then the willette legalize the dorrie. If something legalize the hesther then the hesther legalize the willette. If something legalize the willette then the willette is dyed. The willette is not thrillful.", "logic": "\nLeech(willette, dorrie)\nDysgenic(willette)\nLegalize(willette, hesther)\nLegalize(willette, dorrie)\nQuote(willette, hesther)\nGrisly(hesther)\nThrillful(hesther)\nQuote(hesther, willette)\nThrillful(dorrie)\nLegalize(dorrie, willette)\nLegalize(dorrie, hesther)\nQuote(dorrie, hesther)\nforall x (Dyed(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Legalize(x, willette) and Legalize(willette, dorrie) -> Thrillful(willette))\nforall x (Leech(x, dorrie) and Quote(dorrie, willette) -> Leech(x, willette))\nforall x (Leech(x, dorrie) and Quote(x, willette) -> Legalize(willette, dorrie))\nforall x (Legalize(x, hesther) -> Legalize(hesther, willette))\nforall x (Legalize(x, willette) -> Dyed(willette))\n\nnot Thrillful(willette)\n\nLegalize(dorrie, willette) and Legalize(willette, dorrie) and forall x (Legalize(x, willette) and Legalize(willette, dorrie) -> Thrillful(willette)) -> therefore Thrillful(willette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The osmund tweet the grace. The osmund is branched. The osmund allocate the chad. The osmund allocate the grace. The osmund fashion the chad. The chad is lubricated. The chad is puckish. The chad fashion the osmund. The grace is puckish. The grace allocate the osmund. The grace allocate the chad. The grace fashion the chad. Rough things are arboresque. If something allocate the osmund and the osmund allocate the grace then the osmund is puckish. If something tweet the grace and the grace fashion the osmund then it tweet the osmund. If something tweet the grace and it fashion the osmund then the osmund allocate the grace. If something allocate the chad then the chad allocate the osmund. If something allocate the osmund then the osmund is tragical. The osmund is arboresque.", "logic": "\nTweet(osmund, grace)\nBranched(osmund)\nAllocate(osmund, chad)\nAllocate(osmund, grace)\nFashion(osmund, chad)\nLubricated(chad)\nPuckish(chad)\nFashion(chad, osmund)\nPuckish(grace)\nAllocate(grace, osmund)\nAllocate(grace, chad)\nFashion(grace, chad)\nforall x (Tragical(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Allocate(x, osmund) and Allocate(osmund, grace) -> Puckish(osmund))\nforall x (Tweet(x, grace) and Fashion(grace, osmund) -> Tweet(x, osmund))\nforall x (Tweet(x, grace) and Fashion(x, osmund) -> Allocate(osmund, grace))\nforall x (Allocate(x, chad) -> Allocate(chad, osmund))\nforall x (Allocate(x, osmund) -> Tragical(osmund))\n\nArboresque(osmund)\n\nAllocate(grace, osmund) and forall x (Allocate(x, osmund) -> Tragical(osmund)) -> therefore Tragical(osmund) Tragical(osmund) and forall x (Tragical(x) -> Arboresque(x)) -> therefore Arboresque(osmund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The wilburn emote the dotty. The wilburn is reversed. The wilburn immigrate the ebeneser. The wilburn immigrate the dotty. The wilburn snaffle the ebeneser. The ebeneser is blasting. The ebeneser is dinky. The ebeneser snaffle the wilburn. The dotty is dinky. The dotty immigrate the wilburn. The dotty immigrate the ebeneser. The dotty snaffle the ebeneser. Rough things are genuine. If something immigrate the wilburn and the wilburn immigrate the dotty then the wilburn is dinky. If something emote the dotty and the dotty snaffle the wilburn then it emote the wilburn. If something emote the dotty and it snaffle the wilburn then the wilburn immigrate the dotty. If something immigrate the ebeneser then the ebeneser immigrate the wilburn. If something immigrate the wilburn then the wilburn is sopranino. The wilburn is not genuine.", "logic": "\nEmote(wilburn, dotty)\nReversed(wilburn)\nImmigrate(wilburn, ebeneser)\nImmigrate(wilburn, dotty)\nSnaffle(wilburn, ebeneser)\nBlasting(ebeneser)\nDinky(ebeneser)\nSnaffle(ebeneser, wilburn)\nDinky(dotty)\nImmigrate(dotty, wilburn)\nImmigrate(dotty, ebeneser)\nSnaffle(dotty, ebeneser)\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Genuine(x))\nforall x (Immigrate(x, wilburn) and Immigrate(wilburn, dotty) -> Dinky(wilburn))\nforall x (Emote(x, dotty) and Snaffle(dotty, wilburn) -> Emote(x, wilburn))\nforall x (Emote(x, dotty) and Snaffle(x, wilburn) -> Immigrate(wilburn, dotty))\nforall x (Immigrate(x, ebeneser) -> Immigrate(ebeneser, wilburn))\nforall x (Immigrate(x, wilburn) -> Sopranino(wilburn))\n\nnot Genuine(wilburn)\n\nImmigrate(dotty, wilburn) and forall x (Immigrate(x, wilburn) -> Sopranino(wilburn)) -> therefore Sopranino(wilburn) Sopranino(wilburn) and forall x (Sopranino(x) -> Genuine(x)) -> therefore Genuine(wilburn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The titus bespatter the drake. The titus is asynergic. The titus mudwrestle the ajay. The titus mudwrestle the drake. The titus mimeo the ajay. The ajay is detonative. The ajay is urethral. The ajay mimeo the titus. The drake is urethral. The drake mudwrestle the titus. The drake mudwrestle the ajay. The drake mimeo the ajay. Rough things are intertidal. If something mudwrestle the titus and the titus mudwrestle the drake then the titus is urethral. If something bespatter the drake and the drake mimeo the titus then it bespatter the titus. If something bespatter the drake and it mimeo the titus then the titus mudwrestle the drake. If something mudwrestle the ajay then the ajay mudwrestle the titus. If something mudwrestle the titus then the titus is shed. The titus does not eat the titus.", "logic": "\nBespatter(titus, drake)\nAsynergic(titus)\nMudwrestle(titus, ajay)\nMudwrestle(titus, drake)\nMimeo(titus, ajay)\nDetonative(ajay)\nUrethral(ajay)\nMimeo(ajay, titus)\nUrethral(drake)\nMudwrestle(drake, titus)\nMudwrestle(drake, ajay)\nMimeo(drake, ajay)\nforall x (Shed(x) -> Intertidal(x))\nforall x (Mudwrestle(x, titus) and Mudwrestle(titus, drake) -> Urethral(titus))\nforall x (Bespatter(x, drake) and Mimeo(drake, titus) -> Bespatter(x, titus))\nforall x (Bespatter(x, drake) and Mimeo(x, titus) -> Mudwrestle(titus, drake))\nforall x (Mudwrestle(x, ajay) -> Mudwrestle(ajay, titus))\nforall x (Mudwrestle(x, titus) -> Shed(titus))\n\nnot Bespatter(titus, titus)\n\nforall x (Bespatter(x, drake) and Mimeo(drake, titus) -> Bespatter(x, titus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The inci socialize the moses. The inci is sexy. The inci divulge the tiffi. The inci divulge the moses. The inci collude the tiffi. The tiffi is genealogic. The tiffi is thinking. The tiffi collude the inci. The moses is thinking. The moses divulge the inci. The moses divulge the tiffi. The moses collude the tiffi. Rough things are bareheaded. If something divulge the inci and the inci divulge the moses then the inci is thinking. If something socialize the moses and the moses collude the inci then it socialize the inci. If something socialize the moses and it collude the inci then the inci divulge the moses. If something divulge the tiffi then the tiffi divulge the inci. If something divulge the inci then the inci is haptic. The moses socialize the inci.", "logic": "\nSocialize(inci, moses)\nSexy(inci)\nDivulge(inci, tiffi)\nDivulge(inci, moses)\nCollude(inci, tiffi)\nGenealogic(tiffi)\nThinking(tiffi)\nCollude(tiffi, inci)\nThinking(moses)\nDivulge(moses, inci)\nDivulge(moses, tiffi)\nCollude(moses, tiffi)\nforall x (Haptic(x) -> Bareheaded(x))\nforall x (Divulge(x, inci) and Divulge(inci, moses) -> Thinking(inci))\nforall x (Socialize(x, moses) and Collude(moses, inci) -> Socialize(x, inci))\nforall x (Socialize(x, moses) and Collude(x, inci) -> Divulge(inci, moses))\nforall x (Divulge(x, tiffi) -> Divulge(tiffi, inci))\nforall x (Divulge(x, inci) -> Haptic(inci))\n\nSocialize(moses, inci)\n\nforall x (Socialize(x, moses) and Collude(moses, inci) -> Socialize(x, inci)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The brewer squander the emlyn. The brewer is rudderless. The brewer snick the vinny. The brewer snick the emlyn. The brewer muddle the vinny. The vinny is definite. The vinny is lactic. The vinny muddle the brewer. The emlyn is lactic. The emlyn snick the brewer. The emlyn snick the vinny. The emlyn muddle the vinny. Rough things are innocuous. If something snick the brewer and the brewer snick the emlyn then the brewer is lactic. If something squander the emlyn and the emlyn muddle the brewer then it squander the brewer. If something squander the emlyn and it muddle the brewer then the brewer snick the emlyn. If something snick the vinny then the vinny snick the brewer. If something snick the brewer then the brewer is vernal. The vinny is not innocuous.", "logic": "\nSquander(brewer, emlyn)\nRudderless(brewer)\nSnick(brewer, vinny)\nSnick(brewer, emlyn)\nMuddle(brewer, vinny)\nDefinite(vinny)\nLactic(vinny)\nMuddle(vinny, brewer)\nLactic(emlyn)\nSnick(emlyn, brewer)\nSnick(emlyn, vinny)\nMuddle(emlyn, vinny)\nforall x (Vernal(x) -> Innocuous(x))\nforall x (Snick(x, brewer) and Snick(brewer, emlyn) -> Lactic(brewer))\nforall x (Squander(x, emlyn) and Muddle(emlyn, brewer) -> Squander(x, brewer))\nforall x (Squander(x, emlyn) and Muddle(x, brewer) -> Snick(brewer, emlyn))\nforall x (Snick(x, vinny) -> Snick(vinny, brewer))\nforall x (Snick(x, brewer) -> Vernal(brewer))\n\nnot Innocuous(vinny)\n\nforall x (Vernal(x) -> Innocuous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The jayme partake the sherlock. The jayme is blackish. The jayme lame the sybilla. The jayme lame the sherlock. The jayme acetylize the sybilla. The sybilla is homey. The sybilla is chartered. The sybilla acetylize the jayme. The sherlock is chartered. The sherlock lame the jayme. The sherlock lame the sybilla. The sherlock acetylize the sybilla. Rough things are aberdonian. If something lame the jayme and the jayme lame the sherlock then the jayme is chartered. If something partake the sherlock and the sherlock acetylize the jayme then it partake the jayme. If something partake the sherlock and it acetylize the jayme then the jayme lame the sherlock. If something lame the sybilla then the sybilla lame the jayme. If something lame the jayme then the jayme is clubbish. The sybilla is clubbish.", "logic": "\nPartake(jayme, sherlock)\nBlackish(jayme)\nLame(jayme, sybilla)\nLame(jayme, sherlock)\nAcetylize(jayme, sybilla)\nHomey(sybilla)\nChartered(sybilla)\nAcetylize(sybilla, jayme)\nChartered(sherlock)\nLame(sherlock, jayme)\nLame(sherlock, sybilla)\nAcetylize(sherlock, sybilla)\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\nforall x (Lame(x, jayme) and Lame(jayme, sherlock) -> Chartered(jayme))\nforall x (Partake(x, sherlock) and Acetylize(sherlock, jayme) -> Partake(x, jayme))\nforall x (Partake(x, sherlock) and Acetylize(x, jayme) -> Lame(jayme, sherlock))\nforall x (Lame(x, sybilla) -> Lame(sybilla, jayme))\nforall x (Lame(x, jayme) -> Clubbish(jayme))\n\nClubbish(sybilla)\n\nClubbish(sybilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The rivi cognise the gwennie. The rivi is dicey. The rivi chunk the alain. The rivi chunk the gwennie. The rivi applique the alain. The alain is autoimmune. The alain is asthenic. The alain applique the rivi. The gwennie is asthenic. The gwennie chunk the rivi. The gwennie chunk the alain. The gwennie applique the alain. Rough things are neural. If something chunk the rivi and the rivi chunk the gwennie then the rivi is asthenic. If something cognise the gwennie and the gwennie applique the rivi then it cognise the rivi. If something cognise the gwennie and it applique the rivi then the rivi chunk the gwennie. If something chunk the alain then the alain chunk the rivi. If something chunk the rivi then the rivi is mucous. The alain does not eat the alain.", "logic": "\nCognise(rivi, gwennie)\nDicey(rivi)\nChunk(rivi, alain)\nChunk(rivi, gwennie)\nApplique(rivi, alain)\nAutoimmune(alain)\nAsthenic(alain)\nApplique(alain, rivi)\nAsthenic(gwennie)\nChunk(gwennie, rivi)\nChunk(gwennie, alain)\nApplique(gwennie, alain)\nforall x (Mucous(x) -> Neural(x))\nforall x (Chunk(x, rivi) and Chunk(rivi, gwennie) -> Asthenic(rivi))\nforall x (Cognise(x, gwennie) and Applique(gwennie, rivi) -> Cognise(x, rivi))\nforall x (Cognise(x, gwennie) and Applique(x, rivi) -> Chunk(rivi, gwennie))\nforall x (Chunk(x, alain) -> Chunk(alain, rivi))\nforall x (Chunk(x, rivi) -> Mucous(rivi))\n\nnot Cognise(alain, alain)\n\nnot Cognise(alain, alain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "The stephana manicure the gertrude. The stephana is tantric. The stephana upholster the keren. The stephana upholster the gertrude. The stephana satisfice the keren. The keren is plane. The keren is effortless. The keren satisfice the stephana. The gertrude is effortless. The gertrude upholster the stephana. The gertrude upholster the keren. The gertrude satisfice the keren. Rough things are metacarpal. If something upholster the stephana and the stephana upholster the gertrude then the stephana is effortless. If something manicure the gertrude and the gertrude satisfice the stephana then it manicure the stephana. If something manicure the gertrude and it satisfice the stephana then the stephana upholster the gertrude. If something upholster the keren then the keren upholster the stephana. If something upholster the stephana then the stephana is inexpiable. The stephana is plane.", "logic": "\nManicure(stephana, gertrude)\nTantric(stephana)\nUpholster(stephana, keren)\nUpholster(stephana, gertrude)\nSatisfice(stephana, keren)\nPlane(keren)\nEffortless(keren)\nSatisfice(keren, stephana)\nEffortless(gertrude)\nUpholster(gertrude, stephana)\nUpholster(gertrude, keren)\nSatisfice(gertrude, keren)\nforall x (Inexpiable(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Upholster(x, stephana) and Upholster(stephana, gertrude) -> Effortless(stephana))\nforall x (Manicure(x, gertrude) and Satisfice(gertrude, stephana) -> Manicure(x, stephana))\nforall x (Manicure(x, gertrude) and Satisfice(x, stephana) -> Upholster(stephana, gertrude))\nforall x (Upholster(x, keren) -> Upholster(keren, stephana))\nforall x (Upholster(x, stephana) -> Inexpiable(stephana))\n\nPlane(stephana)\n\nPlane(stephana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-875"} {"premises": "Selestina is clothed. Hadrian is seafaring. Magdalen is breakaway. If Magdalen is breakaway then Magdalen is oral. If Hadrian is nostalgic then Hadrian is seafaring. If Magdalen is oral then Magdalen is seafaring. Selestina is clothed.", "logic": "\nClothed(selestina)\nSeafaring(hadrian)\nBreakaway(magdalen)\nBreakaway(magdalen) -> Oral(magdalen)\nNostalgic(hadrian) -> Seafaring(hadrian)\nOral(magdalen) -> Seafaring(magdalen)\n\nClothed(selestina)\n\ntherefore Clothed(selestina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Jeniffer is mystifying. Janean is unrhymed. Jeraldine is anatropous. If Jeraldine is anatropous then Jeraldine is grave. If Janean is vicarious then Janean is unrhymed. If Jeraldine is grave then Jeraldine is unrhymed. Janean is not unrhymed.", "logic": "\nMystifying(jeniffer)\nUnrhymed(janean)\nAnatropous(jeraldine)\nAnatropous(jeraldine) -> Grave(jeraldine)\nVicarious(janean) -> Unrhymed(janean)\nGrave(jeraldine) -> Unrhymed(jeraldine)\n\nnot Unrhymed(janean)\n\ntherefore Unrhymed(janean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Reina is quack. Cicily is corpulent. Clara is fledgling. If Clara is fledgling then Clara is upright. If Cicily is equable then Cicily is corpulent. If Clara is upright then Clara is corpulent. Clara is upright.", "logic": "\nQuack(reina)\nCorpulent(cicily)\nFledgling(clara)\nFledgling(clara) -> Upright(clara)\nEquable(cicily) -> Corpulent(cicily)\nUpright(clara) -> Corpulent(clara)\n\nUpright(clara)\n\nFledgling(clara) and Fledgling(clara) -> Upright(clara) -> therefore Upright(clara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Devora is botched. Lev is possessed. Ricard is masonic. If Ricard is masonic then Ricard is narcotized. If Lev is scruffy then Lev is possessed. If Ricard is narcotized then Ricard is possessed. Ricard is not narcotized.", "logic": "\nBotched(devora)\nPossessed(lev)\nMasonic(ricard)\nMasonic(ricard) -> Narcotized(ricard)\nScruffy(lev) -> Possessed(lev)\nNarcotized(ricard) -> Possessed(ricard)\n\nnot Narcotized(ricard)\n\nMasonic(ricard) and Masonic(ricard) -> Narcotized(ricard) -> therefore Narcotized(ricard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Arne is ribbony. Tatiana is doctoral. Stesha is sardinian. If Stesha is sardinian then Stesha is adrenergic. If Tatiana is filmed then Tatiana is doctoral. If Stesha is adrenergic then Stesha is doctoral. Stesha is doctoral.", "logic": "\nRibbony(arne)\nDoctoral(tatiana)\nSardinian(stesha)\nSardinian(stesha) -> Adrenergic(stesha)\nFilmed(tatiana) -> Doctoral(tatiana)\nAdrenergic(stesha) -> Doctoral(stesha)\n\nDoctoral(stesha)\n\nSardinian(stesha) and Sardinian(stesha) -> Adrenergic(stesha) -> therefore Adrenergic(stesha) Adrenergic(stesha) and Adrenergic(stesha) -> Doctoral(stesha) -> therefore Doctoral(stesha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Scarface is trojan. Dorcas is extensile. Nolan is scorbutic. If Nolan is scorbutic then Nolan is worse. If Dorcas is sisterly then Dorcas is extensile. If Nolan is worse then Nolan is extensile. Nolan is not extensile.", "logic": "\nTrojan(scarface)\nExtensile(dorcas)\nScorbutic(nolan)\nScorbutic(nolan) -> Worse(nolan)\nSisterly(dorcas) -> Extensile(dorcas)\nWorse(nolan) -> Extensile(nolan)\n\nnot Extensile(nolan)\n\nScorbutic(nolan) and Scorbutic(nolan) -> Worse(nolan) -> therefore Worse(nolan) Worse(nolan) and Worse(nolan) -> Extensile(nolan) -> therefore Extensile(nolan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Uta is unprepared. Adara is vexatious. Scottie is superhuman. If Scottie is superhuman then Scottie is northwest. If Adara is unheeding then Adara is vexatious. If Scottie is northwest then Scottie is vexatious. Adara is not blue.", "logic": "\nUnprepared(uta)\nVexatious(adara)\nSuperhuman(scottie)\nSuperhuman(scottie) -> Northwest(scottie)\nUnheeding(adara) -> Vexatious(adara)\nNorthwest(scottie) -> Vexatious(scottie)\n\nnot Blue(adara)\n\nnot Blue(adara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Carlee is earless. Lotte is silken. Quinta is steady. If Quinta is steady then Quinta is protrusive. If Lotte is uninitiate then Lotte is silken. If Quinta is protrusive then Quinta is silken. Carlee is silken.", "logic": "\nEarless(carlee)\nSilken(lotte)\nSteady(quinta)\nSteady(quinta) -> Protrusive(quinta)\nUninitiate(lotte) -> Silken(lotte)\nProtrusive(quinta) -> Silken(quinta)\n\nSilken(carlee)\n\nSilken(carlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Marshal is miscible. Yale is burled. Melisenda is sibylline. If Melisenda is sibylline then Melisenda is zambian. If Yale is fazed then Yale is burled. If Melisenda is zambian then Melisenda is burled. Yale is not zambian.", "logic": "\nMiscible(marshal)\nBurled(yale)\nSibylline(melisenda)\nSibylline(melisenda) -> Zambian(melisenda)\nFazed(yale) -> Burled(yale)\nZambian(melisenda) -> Burled(melisenda)\n\nnot Zambian(yale)\n\nnot Zambian(yale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Niccolo is crimson. Prudi is nigh. Laverne is formed. If Laverne is formed then Laverne is full. If Prudi is variolous then Prudi is nigh. If Laverne is full then Laverne is nigh. Laverne is furry.", "logic": "\nCrimson(niccolo)\nNigh(prudi)\nFormed(laverne)\nFormed(laverne) -> Full(laverne)\nVariolous(prudi) -> Nigh(prudi)\nFull(laverne) -> Nigh(laverne)\n\nFurry(laverne)\n\nFurry(laverne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Emanuel is diarrheic. Truman is malposed. Olenka is excellent. If Olenka is excellent then Olenka is unarmoured. If Truman is untuneful then Truman is malposed. If Olenka is unarmoured then Olenka is malposed. Truman is not diarrheic.", "logic": "\nDiarrheic(emanuel)\nMalposed(truman)\nExcellent(olenka)\nExcellent(olenka) -> Unarmoured(olenka)\nUntuneful(truman) -> Malposed(truman)\nUnarmoured(olenka) -> Malposed(olenka)\n\nnot Diarrheic(truman)\n\nnot Diarrheic(truman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Hadria is tinkling. Sabine is constant. Harlan is pinchbeck. If Harlan is pinchbeck then Harlan is spasmodic. If Sabine is brotherly then Sabine is constant. If Harlan is spasmodic then Harlan is constant. Harlan is brotherly.", "logic": "\nTinkling(hadria)\nConstant(sabine)\nPinchbeck(harlan)\nPinchbeck(harlan) -> Spasmodic(harlan)\nBrotherly(sabine) -> Constant(sabine)\nSpasmodic(harlan) -> Constant(harlan)\n\nBrotherly(harlan)\n\nBrotherly(harlan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2185"} {"premises": "Rene is paniculate. Rene is tottery. Rene is caudated. Rene is transfixed. Geralda is carbonylic. Geralda is caudated. Geralda is drained. Geralda is starchlike. Yuri is carbonylic. Yuri is paniculate. Yuri is tottery. Yuri is caudated. Yuri is drained. Yuri is transfixed. Yuri is starchlike. Red things are drained. If something is tottery and starchlike then it is paniculate. If something is drained then it is starchlike. Yuri is carbonylic.", "logic": "\nPaniculate(rene)\nTottery(rene)\nCaudated(rene)\nTransfixed(rene)\nCarbonylic(geralda)\nCaudated(geralda)\nDrained(geralda)\nStarchlike(geralda)\nCarbonylic(yuri)\nPaniculate(yuri)\nTottery(yuri)\nCaudated(yuri)\nDrained(yuri)\nTransfixed(yuri)\nStarchlike(yuri)\nforall x (Caudated(x) -> Drained(x))\nforall x (Tottery(x) and Starchlike(x) -> Paniculate(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) -> Starchlike(x))\n\nCarbonylic(yuri)\n\ntherefore Carbonylic(yuri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Sander is maladroit. Sander is bimanual. Sander is definable. Sander is evil. Welbie is nodding. Welbie is definable. Welbie is statuesque. Welbie is arsenical. Ceciley is nodding. Ceciley is maladroit. Ceciley is bimanual. Ceciley is definable. Ceciley is statuesque. Ceciley is evil. Ceciley is arsenical. Red things are statuesque. If something is bimanual and arsenical then it is maladroit. If something is statuesque then it is arsenical. Sander is not maladroit.", "logic": "\nMaladroit(sander)\nBimanual(sander)\nDefinable(sander)\nEvil(sander)\nNodding(welbie)\nDefinable(welbie)\nStatuesque(welbie)\nArsenical(welbie)\nNodding(ceciley)\nMaladroit(ceciley)\nBimanual(ceciley)\nDefinable(ceciley)\nStatuesque(ceciley)\nEvil(ceciley)\nArsenical(ceciley)\nforall x (Definable(x) -> Statuesque(x))\nforall x (Bimanual(x) and Arsenical(x) -> Maladroit(x))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> Arsenical(x))\n\nnot Maladroit(sander)\n\ntherefore Maladroit(sander)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Curtice is preferent. Curtice is yeasty. Curtice is citric. Curtice is stalkless. Susy is anthropic. Susy is citric. Susy is outrageous. Susy is calcific. Edythe is anthropic. Edythe is preferent. Edythe is yeasty. Edythe is citric. Edythe is outrageous. Edythe is stalkless. Edythe is calcific. Red things are outrageous. If something is yeasty and calcific then it is preferent. If something is outrageous then it is calcific. Curtice is outrageous.", "logic": "\nPreferent(curtice)\nYeasty(curtice)\nCitric(curtice)\nStalkless(curtice)\nAnthropic(susy)\nCitric(susy)\nOutrageous(susy)\nCalcific(susy)\nAnthropic(edythe)\nPreferent(edythe)\nYeasty(edythe)\nCitric(edythe)\nOutrageous(edythe)\nStalkless(edythe)\nCalcific(edythe)\nforall x (Citric(x) -> Outrageous(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) and Calcific(x) -> Preferent(x))\nforall x (Outrageous(x) -> Calcific(x))\n\nOutrageous(curtice)\n\nCitric(curtice) and forall x (Citric(x) -> Outrageous(x)) -> therefore Outrageous(curtice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Patin is striate. Patin is insouciant. Patin is mozartian. Patin is perfoliate. Jackie is obscure. Jackie is mozartian. Jackie is zodiacal. Jackie is collective. Nicola is obscure. Nicola is striate. Nicola is insouciant. Nicola is mozartian. Nicola is zodiacal. Nicola is perfoliate. Nicola is collective. Red things are zodiacal. If something is insouciant and collective then it is striate. If something is zodiacal then it is collective. Patin is not zodiacal.", "logic": "\nStriate(patin)\nInsouciant(patin)\nMozartian(patin)\nPerfoliate(patin)\nObscure(jackie)\nMozartian(jackie)\nZodiacal(jackie)\nCollective(jackie)\nObscure(nicola)\nStriate(nicola)\nInsouciant(nicola)\nMozartian(nicola)\nZodiacal(nicola)\nPerfoliate(nicola)\nCollective(nicola)\nforall x (Mozartian(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and Collective(x) -> Striate(x))\nforall x (Zodiacal(x) -> Collective(x))\n\nnot Zodiacal(patin)\n\nMozartian(patin) and forall x (Mozartian(x) -> Zodiacal(x)) -> therefore Zodiacal(patin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Adora is kingly. Adora is edible. Adora is clouded. Adora is brainish. Layla is adjunctive. Layla is clouded. Layla is strong. Layla is recumbent. Secunda is adjunctive. Secunda is kingly. Secunda is edible. Secunda is clouded. Secunda is strong. Secunda is brainish. Secunda is recumbent. Red things are strong. If something is edible and recumbent then it is kingly. If something is strong then it is recumbent. Adora is recumbent.", "logic": "\nKingly(adora)\nEdible(adora)\nClouded(adora)\nBrainish(adora)\nAdjunctive(layla)\nClouded(layla)\nStrong(layla)\nRecumbent(layla)\nAdjunctive(secunda)\nKingly(secunda)\nEdible(secunda)\nClouded(secunda)\nStrong(secunda)\nBrainish(secunda)\nRecumbent(secunda)\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Strong(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) and Recumbent(x) -> Kingly(x))\nforall x (Strong(x) -> Recumbent(x))\n\nRecumbent(adora)\n\nClouded(adora) and forall x (Clouded(x) -> Strong(x)) -> therefore Strong(adora) Strong(adora) and forall x (Strong(x) -> Recumbent(x)) -> therefore Recumbent(adora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Willa is scurfy. Willa is heroical. Willa is toupeed. Willa is attentive. Darcie is endermic. Darcie is toupeed. Darcie is strained. Darcie is straplike. Godart is endermic. Godart is scurfy. Godart is heroical. Godart is toupeed. Godart is strained. Godart is attentive. Godart is straplike. Red things are strained. If something is heroical and straplike then it is scurfy. If something is strained then it is straplike. Willa is not straplike.", "logic": "\nScurfy(willa)\nHeroical(willa)\nToupeed(willa)\nAttentive(willa)\nEndermic(darcie)\nToupeed(darcie)\nStrained(darcie)\nStraplike(darcie)\nEndermic(godart)\nScurfy(godart)\nHeroical(godart)\nToupeed(godart)\nStrained(godart)\nAttentive(godart)\nStraplike(godart)\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Strained(x))\nforall x (Heroical(x) and Straplike(x) -> Scurfy(x))\nforall x (Strained(x) -> Straplike(x))\n\nnot Straplike(willa)\n\nToupeed(willa) and forall x (Toupeed(x) -> Strained(x)) -> therefore Strained(willa) Strained(willa) and forall x (Strained(x) -> Straplike(x)) -> therefore Straplike(willa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Vassily is finer. Vassily is suborbital. Vassily is appetitive. Vassily is societal. Roobbie is grieving. Roobbie is appetitive. Roobbie is sanguine. Roobbie is dotted. Caspar is grieving. Caspar is finer. Caspar is suborbital. Caspar is appetitive. Caspar is sanguine. Caspar is societal. Caspar is dotted. Red things are sanguine. If something is suborbital and dotted then it is finer. If something is sanguine then it is dotted. Roobbie is not finer.", "logic": "\nFiner(vassily)\nSuborbital(vassily)\nAppetitive(vassily)\nSocietal(vassily)\nGrieving(roobbie)\nAppetitive(roobbie)\nSanguine(roobbie)\nDotted(roobbie)\nGrieving(caspar)\nFiner(caspar)\nSuborbital(caspar)\nAppetitive(caspar)\nSanguine(caspar)\nSocietal(caspar)\nDotted(caspar)\nforall x (Appetitive(x) -> Sanguine(x))\nforall x (Suborbital(x) and Dotted(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Sanguine(x) -> Dotted(x))\n\nnot Finer(roobbie)\n\nforall x (Suborbital(x) and Dotted(x) -> Finer(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Dasie is arterial. Dasie is adjunct. Dasie is azygos. Dasie is immediate. Loralyn is sterile. Loralyn is azygos. Loralyn is wrenching. Loralyn is antitypic. Abagail is sterile. Abagail is arterial. Abagail is adjunct. Abagail is azygos. Abagail is wrenching. Abagail is immediate. Abagail is antitypic. Red things are wrenching. If something is adjunct and antitypic then it is arterial. If something is wrenching then it is antitypic. Loralyn is adjunct.", "logic": "\nArterial(dasie)\nAdjunct(dasie)\nAzygos(dasie)\nImmediate(dasie)\nSterile(loralyn)\nAzygos(loralyn)\nWrenching(loralyn)\nAntitypic(loralyn)\nSterile(abagail)\nArterial(abagail)\nAdjunct(abagail)\nAzygos(abagail)\nWrenching(abagail)\nImmediate(abagail)\nAntitypic(abagail)\nforall x (Azygos(x) -> Wrenching(x))\nforall x (Adjunct(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Arterial(x))\nforall x (Wrenching(x) -> Antitypic(x))\n\nAdjunct(loralyn)\n\nAdjunct(loralyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Jacquetta is braggy. Jacquetta is ultrasonic. Jacquetta is indulgent. Jacquetta is uniformed. Sheila is vapourised. Sheila is indulgent. Sheila is xxix. Sheila is mesolithic. Cristen is vapourised. Cristen is braggy. Cristen is ultrasonic. Cristen is indulgent. Cristen is xxix. Cristen is uniformed. Cristen is mesolithic. Red things are xxix. If something is ultrasonic and mesolithic then it is braggy. If something is xxix then it is mesolithic. Jacquetta is not vapourised.", "logic": "\nBraggy(jacquetta)\nUltrasonic(jacquetta)\nIndulgent(jacquetta)\nUniformed(jacquetta)\nVapourised(sheila)\nIndulgent(sheila)\nXxix(sheila)\nMesolithic(sheila)\nVapourised(cristen)\nBraggy(cristen)\nUltrasonic(cristen)\nIndulgent(cristen)\nXxix(cristen)\nUniformed(cristen)\nMesolithic(cristen)\nforall x (Indulgent(x) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) and Mesolithic(x) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Xxix(x) -> Mesolithic(x))\n\nnot Vapourised(jacquetta)\n\nnot Vapourised(jacquetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "Alissa is splotched. Alissa is surficial. Alissa is boundless. Alissa is anodal. Shanon is phagocytic. Shanon is boundless. Shanon is tender. Shanon is unmarked. Mathew is phagocytic. Mathew is splotched. Mathew is surficial. Mathew is boundless. Mathew is tender. Mathew is anodal. Mathew is unmarked. Red things are tender. If something is surficial and unmarked then it is splotched. If something is tender then it is unmarked. Shanon is anodal.", "logic": "\nSplotched(alissa)\nSurficial(alissa)\nBoundless(alissa)\nAnodal(alissa)\nPhagocytic(shanon)\nBoundless(shanon)\nTender(shanon)\nUnmarked(shanon)\nPhagocytic(mathew)\nSplotched(mathew)\nSurficial(mathew)\nBoundless(mathew)\nTender(mathew)\nAnodal(mathew)\nUnmarked(mathew)\nforall x (Boundless(x) -> Tender(x))\nforall x (Surficial(x) and Unmarked(x) -> Splotched(x))\nforall x (Tender(x) -> Unmarked(x))\n\nAnodal(shanon)\n\nAnodal(shanon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-728"} {"premises": "The reggis decamp the avery. The reggis sprout the ilyse. The ilyse is not crowded. The ilyse is alliaceous. The ilyse is galling. The ilyse behave the reggis. The ilyse behave the avery. The ilyse decamp the francesco. The avery is crowded. The francesco is crackle. The francesco is alliaceous. The francesco behave the avery. The francesco decamp the reggis. The francesco sprout the reggis. The francesco sprout the ilyse. The francesco does not visit the avery. If something is alliaceous then it sprout the reggis. If the francesco behave the avery then the francesco decamp the reggis. If something behave the francesco then the francesco sprout the ilyse. If something behave the avery then it is alliaceous. If something is galling and not crowded then it is not crackle. If the avery sprout the reggis and the reggis decamp the francesco then the avery is crackle. If something behave the avery and the avery is not alliaceous then it does not need the ilyse. If something behave the avery and it is not crackle then it decamp the avery. The francesco does not visit the avery.", "logic": "\nDecamp(reggis, avery)\nSprout(reggis, ilyse)\nnot Crowded(ilyse)\nAlliaceous(ilyse)\nGalling(ilyse)\nBehave(ilyse, reggis)\nBehave(ilyse, avery)\nDecamp(ilyse, francesco)\nCrowded(avery)\nCrackle(francesco)\nAlliaceous(francesco)\nBehave(francesco, avery)\nDecamp(francesco, reggis)\nSprout(francesco, reggis)\nSprout(francesco, ilyse)\nnot Sprout(francesco, avery)\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) -> Sprout(x, reggis))\nBehave(francesco, avery) -> Decamp(francesco, reggis)\nforall x (Behave(x, francesco) -> Sprout(francesco, ilyse))\nforall x (Behave(x, avery) -> Alliaceous(x))\nforall x (Galling(x) and not Crowded(x) -> not Crackle(x))\nSprout(avery, reggis) and Decamp(reggis, francesco) -> Crackle(avery)\nforall x (Behave(x, avery) and not Alliaceous(avery) -> not Behave(x, ilyse))\nforall x (Behave(x, avery) and not Crackle(x) -> Decamp(x, avery))\n\nnot Sprout(francesco, avery)\n\ntherefore not Sprout(francesco, avery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The shanda solemnise the shanna. The shanda atone the margurite. The margurite is not noncurrent. The margurite is howling. The margurite is formalised. The margurite manhandle the shanda. The margurite manhandle the shanna. The margurite solemnise the fonzie. The shanna is noncurrent. The fonzie is brief. The fonzie is howling. The fonzie manhandle the shanna. The fonzie solemnise the shanda. The fonzie atone the shanda. The fonzie atone the margurite. The fonzie does not visit the shanna. If something is howling then it atone the shanda. If the fonzie manhandle the shanna then the fonzie solemnise the shanda. If something manhandle the fonzie then the fonzie atone the margurite. If something manhandle the shanna then it is howling. If something is formalised and not noncurrent then it is not brief. If the shanna atone the shanda and the shanda solemnise the fonzie then the shanna is brief. If something manhandle the shanna and the shanna is not howling then it does not need the margurite. If something manhandle the shanna and it is not brief then it solemnise the shanna. The shanda does not visit the margurite.", "logic": "\nSolemnise(shanda, shanna)\nAtone(shanda, margurite)\nnot Noncurrent(margurite)\nHowling(margurite)\nFormalised(margurite)\nManhandle(margurite, shanda)\nManhandle(margurite, shanna)\nSolemnise(margurite, fonzie)\nNoncurrent(shanna)\nBrief(fonzie)\nHowling(fonzie)\nManhandle(fonzie, shanna)\nSolemnise(fonzie, shanda)\nAtone(fonzie, shanda)\nAtone(fonzie, margurite)\nnot Atone(fonzie, shanna)\nforall x (Howling(x) -> Atone(x, shanda))\nManhandle(fonzie, shanna) -> Solemnise(fonzie, shanda)\nforall x (Manhandle(x, fonzie) -> Atone(fonzie, margurite))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, shanna) -> Howling(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) and not Noncurrent(x) -> not Brief(x))\nAtone(shanna, shanda) and Solemnise(shanda, fonzie) -> Brief(shanna)\nforall x (Manhandle(x, shanna) and not Howling(shanna) -> not Manhandle(x, margurite))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, shanna) and not Brief(x) -> Solemnise(x, shanna))\n\nnot Atone(shanda, margurite)\n\ntherefore Atone(shanda, margurite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The antonina blackwash the cobbie. The antonina overvalue the beitris. The beitris is not satanic. The beitris is blocked. The beitris is flighted. The beitris cave the antonina. The beitris cave the cobbie. The beitris blackwash the socrates. The cobbie is satanic. The socrates is sozzled. The socrates is blocked. The socrates cave the cobbie. The socrates blackwash the antonina. The socrates overvalue the antonina. The socrates overvalue the beitris. The socrates does not visit the cobbie. If something is blocked then it overvalue the antonina. If the socrates cave the cobbie then the socrates blackwash the antonina. If something cave the socrates then the socrates overvalue the beitris. If something cave the cobbie then it is blocked. If something is flighted and not satanic then it is not sozzled. If the cobbie overvalue the antonina and the antonina blackwash the socrates then the cobbie is sozzled. If something cave the cobbie and the cobbie is not blocked then it does not need the beitris. If something cave the cobbie and it is not sozzled then it blackwash the cobbie. The beitris overvalue the antonina.", "logic": "\nBlackwash(antonina, cobbie)\nOvervalue(antonina, beitris)\nnot Satanic(beitris)\nBlocked(beitris)\nFlighted(beitris)\nCave(beitris, antonina)\nCave(beitris, cobbie)\nBlackwash(beitris, socrates)\nSatanic(cobbie)\nSozzled(socrates)\nBlocked(socrates)\nCave(socrates, cobbie)\nBlackwash(socrates, antonina)\nOvervalue(socrates, antonina)\nOvervalue(socrates, beitris)\nnot Overvalue(socrates, cobbie)\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Overvalue(x, antonina))\nCave(socrates, cobbie) -> Blackwash(socrates, antonina)\nforall x (Cave(x, socrates) -> Overvalue(socrates, beitris))\nforall x (Cave(x, cobbie) -> Blocked(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) and not Satanic(x) -> not Sozzled(x))\nOvervalue(cobbie, antonina) and Blackwash(antonina, socrates) -> Sozzled(cobbie)\nforall x (Cave(x, cobbie) and not Blocked(cobbie) -> not Cave(x, beitris))\nforall x (Cave(x, cobbie) and not Sozzled(x) -> Blackwash(x, cobbie))\n\nOvervalue(beitris, antonina)\n\nBlocked(beitris) and forall x (Blocked(x) -> Overvalue(x, antonina)) -> therefore Overvalue(beitris, antonina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The flore motorize the sherlock. The flore outlive the clarance. The clarance is not ethereal. The clarance is tannic. The clarance is nitric. The clarance roughhouse the flore. The clarance roughhouse the sherlock. The clarance motorize the belva. The sherlock is ethereal. The belva is circinate. The belva is tannic. The belva roughhouse the sherlock. The belva motorize the flore. The belva outlive the flore. The belva outlive the clarance. The belva does not visit the sherlock. If something is tannic then it outlive the flore. If the belva roughhouse the sherlock then the belva motorize the flore. If something roughhouse the belva then the belva outlive the clarance. If something roughhouse the sherlock then it is tannic. If something is nitric and not ethereal then it is not circinate. If the sherlock outlive the flore and the flore motorize the belva then the sherlock is circinate. If something roughhouse the sherlock and the sherlock is not tannic then it does not need the clarance. If something roughhouse the sherlock and it is not circinate then it motorize the sherlock. The clarance does not visit the flore.", "logic": "\nMotorize(flore, sherlock)\nOutlive(flore, clarance)\nnot Ethereal(clarance)\nTannic(clarance)\nNitric(clarance)\nRoughhouse(clarance, flore)\nRoughhouse(clarance, sherlock)\nMotorize(clarance, belva)\nEthereal(sherlock)\nCircinate(belva)\nTannic(belva)\nRoughhouse(belva, sherlock)\nMotorize(belva, flore)\nOutlive(belva, flore)\nOutlive(belva, clarance)\nnot Outlive(belva, sherlock)\nforall x (Tannic(x) -> Outlive(x, flore))\nRoughhouse(belva, sherlock) -> Motorize(belva, flore)\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, belva) -> Outlive(belva, clarance))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, sherlock) -> Tannic(x))\nforall x (Nitric(x) and not Ethereal(x) -> not Circinate(x))\nOutlive(sherlock, flore) and Motorize(flore, belva) -> Circinate(sherlock)\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, sherlock) and not Tannic(sherlock) -> not Roughhouse(x, clarance))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, sherlock) and not Circinate(x) -> Motorize(x, sherlock))\n\nnot Outlive(clarance, flore)\n\nTannic(clarance) and forall x (Tannic(x) -> Outlive(x, flore)) -> therefore Outlive(clarance, flore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The gershon smother the hershel. The gershon redden the anjela. The anjela is not arbitrable. The anjela is supple. The anjela is hexagonal. The anjela resublime the gershon. The anjela resublime the hershel. The anjela smother the vilma. The hershel is arbitrable. The vilma is armored. The vilma is supple. The vilma resublime the hershel. The vilma smother the gershon. The vilma redden the gershon. The vilma redden the anjela. The vilma does not visit the hershel. If something is supple then it redden the gershon. If the vilma resublime the hershel then the vilma smother the gershon. If something resublime the vilma then the vilma redden the anjela. If something resublime the hershel then it is supple. If something is hexagonal and not arbitrable then it is not armored. If the hershel redden the gershon and the gershon smother the vilma then the hershel is armored. If something resublime the hershel and the hershel is not supple then it does not need the anjela. If something resublime the hershel and it is not armored then it smother the hershel. The anjela smother the hershel.", "logic": "\nSmother(gershon, hershel)\nRedden(gershon, anjela)\nnot Arbitrable(anjela)\nSupple(anjela)\nHexagonal(anjela)\nResublime(anjela, gershon)\nResublime(anjela, hershel)\nSmother(anjela, vilma)\nArbitrable(hershel)\nArmored(vilma)\nSupple(vilma)\nResublime(vilma, hershel)\nSmother(vilma, gershon)\nRedden(vilma, gershon)\nRedden(vilma, anjela)\nnot Redden(vilma, hershel)\nforall x (Supple(x) -> Redden(x, gershon))\nResublime(vilma, hershel) -> Smother(vilma, gershon)\nforall x (Resublime(x, vilma) -> Redden(vilma, anjela))\nforall x (Resublime(x, hershel) -> Supple(x))\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) and not Arbitrable(x) -> not Armored(x))\nRedden(hershel, gershon) and Smother(gershon, vilma) -> Armored(hershel)\nforall x (Resublime(x, hershel) and not Supple(hershel) -> not Resublime(x, anjela))\nforall x (Resublime(x, hershel) and not Armored(x) -> Smother(x, hershel))\n\nSmother(anjela, hershel)\n\nHexagonal(anjela) and not Arbitrable(anjela) and forall x (Hexagonal(x) and not Arbitrable(x) -> not Armored(x)) -> therefore not Armored(anjela) Resublime(anjela, hershel) and not Armored(anjela) and forall x (Resublime(x, hershel) and not Armored(x) -> Smother(x, hershel)) -> therefore Smother(anjela, hershel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The kimberli accumulate the kingsly. The kimberli scoop the natalya. The natalya is not cxxv. The natalya is irritated. The natalya is licensed. The natalya unite the kimberli. The natalya unite the kingsly. The natalya accumulate the phyllis. The kingsly is cxxv. The phyllis is selfish. The phyllis is irritated. The phyllis unite the kingsly. The phyllis accumulate the kimberli. The phyllis scoop the kimberli. The phyllis scoop the natalya. The phyllis does not visit the kingsly. If something is irritated then it scoop the kimberli. If the phyllis unite the kingsly then the phyllis accumulate the kimberli. If something unite the phyllis then the phyllis scoop the natalya. If something unite the kingsly then it is irritated. If something is licensed and not cxxv then it is not selfish. If the kingsly scoop the kimberli and the kimberli accumulate the phyllis then the kingsly is selfish. If something unite the kingsly and the kingsly is not irritated then it does not need the natalya. If something unite the kingsly and it is not selfish then it accumulate the kingsly. The natalya does not see the kingsly.", "logic": "\nAccumulate(kimberli, kingsly)\nScoop(kimberli, natalya)\nnot Cxxv(natalya)\nIrritated(natalya)\nLicensed(natalya)\nUnite(natalya, kimberli)\nUnite(natalya, kingsly)\nAccumulate(natalya, phyllis)\nCxxv(kingsly)\nSelfish(phyllis)\nIrritated(phyllis)\nUnite(phyllis, kingsly)\nAccumulate(phyllis, kimberli)\nScoop(phyllis, kimberli)\nScoop(phyllis, natalya)\nnot Scoop(phyllis, kingsly)\nforall x (Irritated(x) -> Scoop(x, kimberli))\nUnite(phyllis, kingsly) -> Accumulate(phyllis, kimberli)\nforall x (Unite(x, phyllis) -> Scoop(phyllis, natalya))\nforall x (Unite(x, kingsly) -> Irritated(x))\nforall x (Licensed(x) and not Cxxv(x) -> not Selfish(x))\nScoop(kingsly, kimberli) and Accumulate(kimberli, phyllis) -> Selfish(kingsly)\nforall x (Unite(x, kingsly) and not Irritated(kingsly) -> not Unite(x, natalya))\nforall x (Unite(x, kingsly) and not Selfish(x) -> Accumulate(x, kingsly))\n\nnot Accumulate(natalya, kingsly)\n\nLicensed(natalya) and not Cxxv(natalya) and forall x (Licensed(x) and not Cxxv(x) -> not Selfish(x)) -> therefore not Selfish(natalya) Unite(natalya, kingsly) and not Selfish(natalya) and forall x (Unite(x, kingsly) and not Selfish(x) -> Accumulate(x, kingsly)) -> therefore Accumulate(natalya, kingsly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The glori obtrude the maire. The glori foreclose the parwane. The parwane is not unfaceted. The parwane is half. The parwane is tired. The parwane disarrange the glori. The parwane disarrange the maire. The parwane obtrude the yoko. The maire is unfaceted. The yoko is emphasised. The yoko is half. The yoko disarrange the maire. The yoko obtrude the glori. The yoko foreclose the glori. The yoko foreclose the parwane. The yoko does not visit the maire. If something is half then it foreclose the glori. If the yoko disarrange the maire then the yoko obtrude the glori. If something disarrange the yoko then the yoko foreclose the parwane. If something disarrange the maire then it is half. If something is tired and not unfaceted then it is not emphasised. If the maire foreclose the glori and the glori obtrude the yoko then the maire is emphasised. If something disarrange the maire and the maire is not half then it does not need the parwane. If something disarrange the maire and it is not emphasised then it obtrude the maire. The yoko does not see the maire.", "logic": "\nObtrude(glori, maire)\nForeclose(glori, parwane)\nnot Unfaceted(parwane)\nHalf(parwane)\nTired(parwane)\nDisarrange(parwane, glori)\nDisarrange(parwane, maire)\nObtrude(parwane, yoko)\nUnfaceted(maire)\nEmphasised(yoko)\nHalf(yoko)\nDisarrange(yoko, maire)\nObtrude(yoko, glori)\nForeclose(yoko, glori)\nForeclose(yoko, parwane)\nnot Foreclose(yoko, maire)\nforall x (Half(x) -> Foreclose(x, glori))\nDisarrange(yoko, maire) -> Obtrude(yoko, glori)\nforall x (Disarrange(x, yoko) -> Foreclose(yoko, parwane))\nforall x (Disarrange(x, maire) -> Half(x))\nforall x (Tired(x) and not Unfaceted(x) -> not Emphasised(x))\nForeclose(maire, glori) and Obtrude(glori, yoko) -> Emphasised(maire)\nforall x (Disarrange(x, maire) and not Half(maire) -> not Disarrange(x, parwane))\nforall x (Disarrange(x, maire) and not Emphasised(x) -> Obtrude(x, maire))\n\nnot Obtrude(yoko, maire)\n\nforall x (Disarrange(x, maire) and not Emphasised(x) -> Obtrude(x, maire)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The averil delouse the mackenzie. The averil premise the barny. The barny is not jumbled. The barny is elder. The barny is cheering. The barny dress the averil. The barny dress the mackenzie. The barny delouse the mable. The mackenzie is jumbled. The mable is salable. The mable is elder. The mable dress the mackenzie. The mable delouse the averil. The mable premise the averil. The mable premise the barny. The mable does not visit the mackenzie. If something is elder then it premise the averil. If the mable dress the mackenzie then the mable delouse the averil. If something dress the mable then the mable premise the barny. If something dress the mackenzie then it is elder. If something is cheering and not jumbled then it is not salable. If the mackenzie premise the averil and the averil delouse the mable then the mackenzie is salable. If something dress the mackenzie and the mackenzie is not elder then it does not need the barny. If something dress the mackenzie and it is not salable then it delouse the mackenzie. The mackenzie delouse the mackenzie.", "logic": "\nDelouse(averil, mackenzie)\nPremise(averil, barny)\nnot Jumbled(barny)\nElder(barny)\nCheering(barny)\nDress(barny, averil)\nDress(barny, mackenzie)\nDelouse(barny, mable)\nJumbled(mackenzie)\nSalable(mable)\nElder(mable)\nDress(mable, mackenzie)\nDelouse(mable, averil)\nPremise(mable, averil)\nPremise(mable, barny)\nnot Premise(mable, mackenzie)\nforall x (Elder(x) -> Premise(x, averil))\nDress(mable, mackenzie) -> Delouse(mable, averil)\nforall x (Dress(x, mable) -> Premise(mable, barny))\nforall x (Dress(x, mackenzie) -> Elder(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) and not Jumbled(x) -> not Salable(x))\nPremise(mackenzie, averil) and Delouse(averil, mable) -> Salable(mackenzie)\nforall x (Dress(x, mackenzie) and not Elder(mackenzie) -> not Dress(x, barny))\nforall x (Dress(x, mackenzie) and not Salable(x) -> Delouse(x, mackenzie))\n\nDelouse(mackenzie, mackenzie)\n\nforall x (Dress(x, mackenzie) and not Salable(x) -> Delouse(x, mackenzie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The lust essay the stanleigh. The lust lacquer the tiphany. The tiphany is not nonslip. The tiphany is poky. The tiphany is tiled. The tiphany acquire the lust. The tiphany acquire the stanleigh. The tiphany essay the andrej. The stanleigh is nonslip. The andrej is lateral. The andrej is poky. The andrej acquire the stanleigh. The andrej essay the lust. The andrej lacquer the lust. The andrej lacquer the tiphany. The andrej does not visit the stanleigh. If something is poky then it lacquer the lust. If the andrej acquire the stanleigh then the andrej essay the lust. If something acquire the andrej then the andrej lacquer the tiphany. If something acquire the stanleigh then it is poky. If something is tiled and not nonslip then it is not lateral. If the stanleigh lacquer the lust and the lust essay the andrej then the stanleigh is lateral. If something acquire the stanleigh and the stanleigh is not poky then it does not need the tiphany. If something acquire the stanleigh and it is not lateral then it essay the stanleigh. The lust does not visit the lust.", "logic": "\nEssay(lust, stanleigh)\nLacquer(lust, tiphany)\nnot Nonslip(tiphany)\nPoky(tiphany)\nTiled(tiphany)\nAcquire(tiphany, lust)\nAcquire(tiphany, stanleigh)\nEssay(tiphany, andrej)\nNonslip(stanleigh)\nLateral(andrej)\nPoky(andrej)\nAcquire(andrej, stanleigh)\nEssay(andrej, lust)\nLacquer(andrej, lust)\nLacquer(andrej, tiphany)\nnot Lacquer(andrej, stanleigh)\nforall x (Poky(x) -> Lacquer(x, lust))\nAcquire(andrej, stanleigh) -> Essay(andrej, lust)\nforall x (Acquire(x, andrej) -> Lacquer(andrej, tiphany))\nforall x (Acquire(x, stanleigh) -> Poky(x))\nforall x (Tiled(x) and not Nonslip(x) -> not Lateral(x))\nLacquer(stanleigh, lust) and Essay(lust, andrej) -> Lateral(stanleigh)\nforall x (Acquire(x, stanleigh) and not Poky(stanleigh) -> not Acquire(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Acquire(x, stanleigh) and not Lateral(x) -> Essay(x, stanleigh))\n\nnot Lacquer(lust, lust)\n\nforall x (Poky(x) -> Lacquer(x, lust)) <- forall x (Acquire(x, stanleigh) -> Poky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The tedmund hopple the verla. The tedmund overlie the christina. The christina is not jelled. The christina is pudgy. The christina is ripe. The christina admonish the tedmund. The christina admonish the verla. The christina hopple the clayton. The verla is jelled. The clayton is autogenic. The clayton is pudgy. The clayton admonish the verla. The clayton hopple the tedmund. The clayton overlie the tedmund. The clayton overlie the christina. The clayton does not visit the verla. If something is pudgy then it overlie the tedmund. If the clayton admonish the verla then the clayton hopple the tedmund. If something admonish the clayton then the clayton overlie the christina. If something admonish the verla then it is pudgy. If something is ripe and not jelled then it is not autogenic. If the verla overlie the tedmund and the tedmund hopple the clayton then the verla is autogenic. If something admonish the verla and the verla is not pudgy then it does not need the christina. If something admonish the verla and it is not autogenic then it hopple the verla. The verla admonish the christina.", "logic": "\nHopple(tedmund, verla)\nOverlie(tedmund, christina)\nnot Jelled(christina)\nPudgy(christina)\nRipe(christina)\nAdmonish(christina, tedmund)\nAdmonish(christina, verla)\nHopple(christina, clayton)\nJelled(verla)\nAutogenic(clayton)\nPudgy(clayton)\nAdmonish(clayton, verla)\nHopple(clayton, tedmund)\nOverlie(clayton, tedmund)\nOverlie(clayton, christina)\nnot Overlie(clayton, verla)\nforall x (Pudgy(x) -> Overlie(x, tedmund))\nAdmonish(clayton, verla) -> Hopple(clayton, tedmund)\nforall x (Admonish(x, clayton) -> Overlie(clayton, christina))\nforall x (Admonish(x, verla) -> Pudgy(x))\nforall x (Ripe(x) and not Jelled(x) -> not Autogenic(x))\nOverlie(verla, tedmund) and Hopple(tedmund, clayton) -> Autogenic(verla)\nforall x (Admonish(x, verla) and not Pudgy(verla) -> not Admonish(x, christina))\nforall x (Admonish(x, verla) and not Autogenic(x) -> Hopple(x, verla))\n\nAdmonish(verla, christina)\n\nAdmonish(verla, christina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The kate hollo the misty. The kate polychrome the daniella. The daniella is not inducive. The daniella is doting. The daniella is even. The daniella locate the kate. The daniella locate the misty. The daniella hollo the donelle. The misty is inducive. The donelle is shelflike. The donelle is doting. The donelle locate the misty. The donelle hollo the kate. The donelle polychrome the kate. The donelle polychrome the daniella. The donelle does not visit the misty. If something is doting then it polychrome the kate. If the donelle locate the misty then the donelle hollo the kate. If something locate the donelle then the donelle polychrome the daniella. If something locate the misty then it is doting. If something is even and not inducive then it is not shelflike. If the misty polychrome the kate and the kate hollo the donelle then the misty is shelflike. If something locate the misty and the misty is not doting then it does not need the daniella. If something locate the misty and it is not shelflike then it hollo the misty. The kate does not visit the misty.", "logic": "\nHollo(kate, misty)\nPolychrome(kate, daniella)\nnot Inducive(daniella)\nDoting(daniella)\nEven(daniella)\nLocate(daniella, kate)\nLocate(daniella, misty)\nHollo(daniella, donelle)\nInducive(misty)\nShelflike(donelle)\nDoting(donelle)\nLocate(donelle, misty)\nHollo(donelle, kate)\nPolychrome(donelle, kate)\nPolychrome(donelle, daniella)\nnot Polychrome(donelle, misty)\nforall x (Doting(x) -> Polychrome(x, kate))\nLocate(donelle, misty) -> Hollo(donelle, kate)\nforall x (Locate(x, donelle) -> Polychrome(donelle, daniella))\nforall x (Locate(x, misty) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Even(x) and not Inducive(x) -> not Shelflike(x))\nPolychrome(misty, kate) and Hollo(kate, donelle) -> Shelflike(misty)\nforall x (Locate(x, misty) and not Doting(misty) -> not Locate(x, daniella))\nforall x (Locate(x, misty) and not Shelflike(x) -> Hollo(x, misty))\n\nnot Polychrome(kate, misty)\n\nnot Polychrome(kate, misty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "The luise cycle the sterling. The luise burke the douglis. The douglis is not triangular. The douglis is prickly. The douglis is unobliging. The douglis pink the luise. The douglis pink the sterling. The douglis cycle the broddy. The sterling is triangular. The broddy is chained. The broddy is prickly. The broddy pink the sterling. The broddy cycle the luise. The broddy burke the luise. The broddy burke the douglis. The broddy does not visit the sterling. If something is prickly then it burke the luise. If the broddy pink the sterling then the broddy cycle the luise. If something pink the broddy then the broddy burke the douglis. If something pink the sterling then it is prickly. If something is unobliging and not triangular then it is not chained. If the sterling burke the luise and the luise cycle the broddy then the sterling is chained. If something pink the sterling and the sterling is not prickly then it does not need the douglis. If something pink the sterling and it is not chained then it cycle the sterling. The luise is unobliging.", "logic": "\nCycle(luise, sterling)\nBurke(luise, douglis)\nnot Triangular(douglis)\nPrickly(douglis)\nUnobliging(douglis)\nPink(douglis, luise)\nPink(douglis, sterling)\nCycle(douglis, broddy)\nTriangular(sterling)\nChained(broddy)\nPrickly(broddy)\nPink(broddy, sterling)\nCycle(broddy, luise)\nBurke(broddy, luise)\nBurke(broddy, douglis)\nnot Burke(broddy, sterling)\nforall x (Prickly(x) -> Burke(x, luise))\nPink(broddy, sterling) -> Cycle(broddy, luise)\nforall x (Pink(x, broddy) -> Burke(broddy, douglis))\nforall x (Pink(x, sterling) -> Prickly(x))\nforall x (Unobliging(x) and not Triangular(x) -> not Chained(x))\nBurke(sterling, luise) and Cycle(luise, broddy) -> Chained(sterling)\nforall x (Pink(x, sterling) and not Prickly(sterling) -> not Pink(x, douglis))\nforall x (Pink(x, sterling) and not Chained(x) -> Cycle(x, sterling))\n\nUnobliging(luise)\n\nUnobliging(luise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1085"} {"premises": "Marcella is tined. Marcella is not branched. Marcella is lobate. Marcella is bald. Marcella is separate. Zerk is branched. Zerk is not bacterial. Zerk is clamorous. Zerk is bald. Zerk is separate. Marsh is branched. Marsh is clamorous. Red people are lobate. If someone is bald and lobate then they are tined. All bacterial people are tined. Zerk is branched.", "logic": "\nTined(marcella)\nnot Branched(marcella)\nLobate(marcella)\nBald(marcella)\nSeparate(marcella)\nBranched(zerk)\nnot Bacterial(zerk)\nClamorous(zerk)\nBald(zerk)\nSeparate(zerk)\nBranched(marsh)\nClamorous(marsh)\nforall x (Clamorous(x) -> Lobate(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Lobate(x) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Bacterial(x) -> Tined(x))\n\nBranched(zerk)\n\ntherefore Branched(zerk)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Corby is begotten. Corby is not unsounded. Corby is mosstone. Corby is mediocre. Corby is disquieted. Kriste is unsounded. Kriste is not nonskid. Kriste is raiseable. Kriste is mediocre. Kriste is disquieted. Roseline is unsounded. Roseline is raiseable. Red people are mosstone. If someone is mediocre and mosstone then they are begotten. All nonskid people are begotten. Roseline is not raiseable.", "logic": "\nBegotten(corby)\nnot Unsounded(corby)\nMosstone(corby)\nMediocre(corby)\nDisquieted(corby)\nUnsounded(kriste)\nnot Nonskid(kriste)\nRaiseable(kriste)\nMediocre(kriste)\nDisquieted(kriste)\nUnsounded(roseline)\nRaiseable(roseline)\nforall x (Raiseable(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) and Mosstone(x) -> Begotten(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Begotten(x))\n\nnot Raiseable(roseline)\n\ntherefore Raiseable(roseline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Pauly is motional. Pauly is not scoured. Pauly is straggly. Pauly is hoar. Pauly is crappy. Berna is scoured. Berna is not epistolary. Berna is fetal. Berna is hoar. Berna is crappy. Lurette is scoured. Lurette is fetal. Red people are straggly. If someone is hoar and straggly then they are motional. All epistolary people are motional. Lurette is straggly.", "logic": "\nMotional(pauly)\nnot Scoured(pauly)\nStraggly(pauly)\nHoar(pauly)\nCrappy(pauly)\nScoured(berna)\nnot Epistolary(berna)\nFetal(berna)\nHoar(berna)\nCrappy(berna)\nScoured(lurette)\nFetal(lurette)\nforall x (Fetal(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Hoar(x) and Straggly(x) -> Motional(x))\nforall x (Epistolary(x) -> Motional(x))\n\nStraggly(lurette)\n\nFetal(lurette) and forall x (Fetal(x) -> Straggly(x)) -> therefore Straggly(lurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Darcey is bonzer. Darcey is not uvular. Darcey is blind. Darcey is ongoing. Darcey is bookish. Madelyn is uvular. Madelyn is not hydrated. Madelyn is super. Madelyn is ongoing. Madelyn is bookish. Thorny is uvular. Thorny is super. Red people are blind. If someone is ongoing and blind then they are bonzer. All hydrated people are bonzer. Thorny is not blind.", "logic": "\nBonzer(darcey)\nnot Uvular(darcey)\nBlind(darcey)\nOngoing(darcey)\nBookish(darcey)\nUvular(madelyn)\nnot Hydrated(madelyn)\nSuper(madelyn)\nOngoing(madelyn)\nBookish(madelyn)\nUvular(thorny)\nSuper(thorny)\nforall x (Super(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) and Blind(x) -> Bonzer(x))\nforall x (Hydrated(x) -> Bonzer(x))\n\nnot Blind(thorny)\n\nSuper(thorny) and forall x (Super(x) -> Blind(x)) -> therefore Blind(thorny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Van is unimagined. Van is not hyperemic. Van is censorious. Van is profane. Van is dendroid. Gretal is hyperemic. Gretal is not unwrinkled. Gretal is surface. Gretal is profane. Gretal is dendroid. Sacha is hyperemic. Sacha is surface. Red people are censorious. If someone is profane and censorious then they are unimagined. All unwrinkled people are unimagined. Gretal is unimagined.", "logic": "\nUnimagined(van)\nnot Hyperemic(van)\nCensorious(van)\nProfane(van)\nDendroid(van)\nHyperemic(gretal)\nnot Unwrinkled(gretal)\nSurface(gretal)\nProfane(gretal)\nDendroid(gretal)\nHyperemic(sacha)\nSurface(sacha)\nforall x (Surface(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Profane(x) and Censorious(x) -> Unimagined(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Unimagined(x))\n\nUnimagined(gretal)\n\nSurface(gretal) and forall x (Surface(x) -> Censorious(x)) -> therefore Censorious(gretal) Profane(gretal) and Censorious(gretal) and forall x (Profane(x) and Censorious(x) -> Unimagined(x)) -> therefore Unimagined(gretal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Henriette is exterior. Henriette is not arborary. Henriette is concurring. Henriette is premier. Henriette is approved. Ethelda is arborary. Ethelda is not loath. Ethelda is bolshevist. Ethelda is premier. Ethelda is approved. Bernice is arborary. Bernice is bolshevist. Red people are concurring. If someone is premier and concurring then they are exterior. All loath people are exterior. Ethelda is not exterior.", "logic": "\nExterior(henriette)\nnot Arborary(henriette)\nConcurring(henriette)\nPremier(henriette)\nApproved(henriette)\nArborary(ethelda)\nnot Loath(ethelda)\nBolshevist(ethelda)\nPremier(ethelda)\nApproved(ethelda)\nArborary(bernice)\nBolshevist(bernice)\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Concurring(x))\nforall x (Premier(x) and Concurring(x) -> Exterior(x))\nforall x (Loath(x) -> Exterior(x))\n\nnot Exterior(ethelda)\n\nBolshevist(ethelda) and forall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Concurring(x)) -> therefore Concurring(ethelda) Premier(ethelda) and Concurring(ethelda) and forall x (Premier(x) and Concurring(x) -> Exterior(x)) -> therefore Exterior(ethelda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Hilde is merited. Hilde is not meshed. Hilde is darling. Hilde is abysmal. Hilde is doctoral. Powell is meshed. Powell is not sprouted. Powell is phylliform. Powell is abysmal. Powell is doctoral. Guendolen is meshed. Guendolen is phylliform. Red people are darling. If someone is abysmal and darling then they are merited. All sprouted people are merited. Guendolen is not merited.", "logic": "\nMerited(hilde)\nnot Meshed(hilde)\nDarling(hilde)\nAbysmal(hilde)\nDoctoral(hilde)\nMeshed(powell)\nnot Sprouted(powell)\nPhylliform(powell)\nAbysmal(powell)\nDoctoral(powell)\nMeshed(guendolen)\nPhylliform(guendolen)\nforall x (Phylliform(x) -> Darling(x))\nforall x (Abysmal(x) and Darling(x) -> Merited(x))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Merited(x))\n\nnot Merited(guendolen)\n\nforall x (Abysmal(x) and Darling(x) -> Merited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "French is pectineal. French is not garlicky. French is umbellate. French is facetious. French is catarrhal. Kristian is garlicky. Kristian is not last. Kristian is chelate. Kristian is facetious. Kristian is catarrhal. Micheil is garlicky. Micheil is chelate. Red people are umbellate. If someone is facetious and umbellate then they are pectineal. All last people are pectineal. Micheil is last.", "logic": "\nPectineal(french)\nnot Garlicky(french)\nUmbellate(french)\nFacetious(french)\nCatarrhal(french)\nGarlicky(kristian)\nnot Last(kristian)\nChelate(kristian)\nFacetious(kristian)\nCatarrhal(kristian)\nGarlicky(micheil)\nChelate(micheil)\nforall x (Chelate(x) -> Umbellate(x))\nforall x (Facetious(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nforall x (Last(x) -> Pectineal(x))\n\nLast(micheil)\n\nLast(micheil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Kore is anxious. Kore is not sublunary. Kore is plumelike. Kore is cushiony. Kore is habitable. Goldarina is sublunary. Goldarina is not soigne. Goldarina is magnetised. Goldarina is cushiony. Goldarina is habitable. Daune is sublunary. Daune is magnetised. Red people are plumelike. If someone is cushiony and plumelike then they are anxious. All soigne people are anxious. Daune is not habitable.", "logic": "\nAnxious(kore)\nnot Sublunary(kore)\nPlumelike(kore)\nCushiony(kore)\nHabitable(kore)\nSublunary(goldarina)\nnot Soigne(goldarina)\nMagnetised(goldarina)\nCushiony(goldarina)\nHabitable(goldarina)\nSublunary(daune)\nMagnetised(daune)\nforall x (Magnetised(x) -> Plumelike(x))\nforall x (Cushiony(x) and Plumelike(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Soigne(x) -> Anxious(x))\n\nnot Habitable(daune)\n\nnot Habitable(daune) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Devi is diestrual. Devi is not susurrous. Devi is milky. Devi is taillike. Devi is lush. Hale is susurrous. Hale is not treeless. Hale is despairing. Hale is taillike. Hale is lush. Perceval is susurrous. Perceval is despairing. Red people are milky. If someone is taillike and milky then they are diestrual. All treeless people are diestrual. Devi is treeless.", "logic": "\nDiestrual(devi)\nnot Susurrous(devi)\nMilky(devi)\nTaillike(devi)\nLush(devi)\nSusurrous(hale)\nnot Treeless(hale)\nDespairing(hale)\nTaillike(hale)\nLush(hale)\nSusurrous(perceval)\nDespairing(perceval)\nforall x (Despairing(x) -> Milky(x))\nforall x (Taillike(x) and Milky(x) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Diestrual(x))\n\nTreeless(devi)\n\nTreeless(devi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Laurene is thwartwise. Laurene is not chaste. Laurene is dour. Laurene is vacuolate. Laurene is begrimed. Adah is chaste. Adah is not atrial. Adah is pocketable. Adah is vacuolate. Adah is begrimed. Abigale is chaste. Abigale is pocketable. Red people are dour. If someone is vacuolate and dour then they are thwartwise. All atrial people are thwartwise. Abigale is not vacuolate.", "logic": "\nThwartwise(laurene)\nnot Chaste(laurene)\nDour(laurene)\nVacuolate(laurene)\nBegrimed(laurene)\nChaste(adah)\nnot Atrial(adah)\nPocketable(adah)\nVacuolate(adah)\nBegrimed(adah)\nChaste(abigale)\nPocketable(abigale)\nforall x (Pocketable(x) -> Dour(x))\nforall x (Vacuolate(x) and Dour(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Atrial(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\n\nnot Vacuolate(abigale)\n\nnot Vacuolate(abigale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "Maddie is terminable. Maddie is not untipped. Maddie is auburn. Maddie is obsessed. Maddie is spinal. Abelard is untipped. Abelard is not azotemic. Abelard is impassable. Abelard is obsessed. Abelard is spinal. Kenton is untipped. Kenton is impassable. Red people are auburn. If someone is obsessed and auburn then they are terminable. All azotemic people are terminable. Maddie is impassable.", "logic": "\nTerminable(maddie)\nnot Untipped(maddie)\nAuburn(maddie)\nObsessed(maddie)\nSpinal(maddie)\nUntipped(abelard)\nnot Azotemic(abelard)\nImpassable(abelard)\nObsessed(abelard)\nSpinal(abelard)\nUntipped(kenton)\nImpassable(kenton)\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Auburn(x))\nforall x (Obsessed(x) and Auburn(x) -> Terminable(x))\nforall x (Azotemic(x) -> Terminable(x))\n\nImpassable(maddie)\n\nImpassable(maddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The tiffy peptise the enrica. The tiffy peptise the shaylah. The tiffy is dumb. The tiffy is consonant. The tiffy brawl the enrica. The enrica is portly. The enrica tout the ulrike. The enrica brawl the shaylah. The shaylah peptise the tiffy. The shaylah is showy. The shaylah brawl the tiffy. The ulrike peptise the enrica. If something is showy then it brawl the ulrike. If something peptise the shaylah then the shaylah is dumb. If something tout the shaylah and the shaylah is showy then the shaylah peptise the enrica. If something brawl the shaylah and the shaylah peptise the tiffy then the tiffy brawl the ulrike. If something is showy then it tout the enrica. If something brawl the ulrike then the ulrike is dumb. The ulrike peptise the enrica.", "logic": "\nPeptise(tiffy, enrica)\nPeptise(tiffy, shaylah)\nDumb(tiffy)\nConsonant(tiffy)\nBrawl(tiffy, enrica)\nPortly(enrica)\nTout(enrica, ulrike)\nBrawl(enrica, shaylah)\nPeptise(shaylah, tiffy)\nShowy(shaylah)\nBrawl(shaylah, tiffy)\nPeptise(ulrike, enrica)\nforall x (Showy(x) -> Brawl(x, ulrike))\nforall x (Peptise(x, shaylah) -> Dumb(shaylah))\nforall x (Tout(x, shaylah) and Showy(shaylah) -> Peptise(shaylah, enrica))\nforall x (Brawl(x, shaylah) and Peptise(shaylah, tiffy) -> Brawl(tiffy, ulrike))\nforall x (Showy(x) -> Tout(x, enrica))\nforall x (Brawl(x, ulrike) -> Dumb(ulrike))\n\nPeptise(ulrike, enrica)\n\ntherefore Peptise(ulrike, enrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The tarrant locomote the mandi. The tarrant locomote the sabina. The tarrant is made. The tarrant is recovered. The tarrant reward the mandi. The mandi is runny. The mandi delimitate the nady. The mandi reward the sabina. The sabina locomote the tarrant. The sabina is befuddled. The sabina reward the tarrant. The nady locomote the mandi. If something is befuddled then it reward the nady. If something locomote the sabina then the sabina is made. If something delimitate the sabina and the sabina is befuddled then the sabina locomote the mandi. If something reward the sabina and the sabina locomote the tarrant then the tarrant reward the nady. If something is befuddled then it delimitate the mandi. If something reward the nady then the nady is made. The sabina does not visit the tarrant.", "logic": "\nLocomote(tarrant, mandi)\nLocomote(tarrant, sabina)\nMade(tarrant)\nRecovered(tarrant)\nReward(tarrant, mandi)\nRunny(mandi)\nDelimitate(mandi, nady)\nReward(mandi, sabina)\nLocomote(sabina, tarrant)\nBefuddled(sabina)\nReward(sabina, tarrant)\nLocomote(nady, mandi)\nforall x (Befuddled(x) -> Reward(x, nady))\nforall x (Locomote(x, sabina) -> Made(sabina))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, sabina) and Befuddled(sabina) -> Locomote(sabina, mandi))\nforall x (Reward(x, sabina) and Locomote(sabina, tarrant) -> Reward(tarrant, nady))\nforall x (Befuddled(x) -> Delimitate(x, mandi))\nforall x (Reward(x, nady) -> Made(nady))\n\nnot Reward(sabina, tarrant)\n\ntherefore Reward(sabina, tarrant)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The diena caracole the wendi. The diena caracole the morley. The diena is expository. The diena is repetitive. The diena spool the wendi. The wendi is waxed. The wendi jacket the voltaire. The wendi spool the morley. The morley caracole the diena. The morley is unexpended. The morley spool the diena. The voltaire caracole the wendi. If something is unexpended then it spool the voltaire. If something caracole the morley then the morley is expository. If something jacket the morley and the morley is unexpended then the morley caracole the wendi. If something spool the morley and the morley caracole the diena then the diena spool the voltaire. If something is unexpended then it jacket the wendi. If something spool the voltaire then the voltaire is expository. The morley spool the voltaire.", "logic": "\nCaracole(diena, wendi)\nCaracole(diena, morley)\nExpository(diena)\nRepetitive(diena)\nSpool(diena, wendi)\nWaxed(wendi)\nJacket(wendi, voltaire)\nSpool(wendi, morley)\nCaracole(morley, diena)\nUnexpended(morley)\nSpool(morley, diena)\nCaracole(voltaire, wendi)\nforall x (Unexpended(x) -> Spool(x, voltaire))\nforall x (Caracole(x, morley) -> Expository(morley))\nforall x (Jacket(x, morley) and Unexpended(morley) -> Caracole(morley, wendi))\nforall x (Spool(x, morley) and Caracole(morley, diena) -> Spool(diena, voltaire))\nforall x (Unexpended(x) -> Jacket(x, wendi))\nforall x (Spool(x, voltaire) -> Expository(voltaire))\n\nSpool(morley, voltaire)\n\nUnexpended(morley) and forall x (Unexpended(x) -> Spool(x, voltaire)) -> therefore Spool(morley, voltaire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The minetta sandblast the esma. The minetta sandblast the ethelind. The minetta is mullioned. The minetta is cuspidated. The minetta engineer the esma. The esma is invisible. The esma fritter the winford. The esma engineer the ethelind. The ethelind sandblast the minetta. The ethelind is beaklike. The ethelind engineer the minetta. The winford sandblast the esma. If something is beaklike then it engineer the winford. If something sandblast the ethelind then the ethelind is mullioned. If something fritter the ethelind and the ethelind is beaklike then the ethelind sandblast the esma. If something engineer the ethelind and the ethelind sandblast the minetta then the minetta engineer the winford. If something is beaklike then it fritter the esma. If something engineer the winford then the winford is mullioned. The ethelind does not need the esma.", "logic": "\nSandblast(minetta, esma)\nSandblast(minetta, ethelind)\nMullioned(minetta)\nCuspidated(minetta)\nEngineer(minetta, esma)\nInvisible(esma)\nFritter(esma, winford)\nEngineer(esma, ethelind)\nSandblast(ethelind, minetta)\nBeaklike(ethelind)\nEngineer(ethelind, minetta)\nSandblast(winford, esma)\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Engineer(x, winford))\nforall x (Sandblast(x, ethelind) -> Mullioned(ethelind))\nforall x (Fritter(x, ethelind) and Beaklike(ethelind) -> Sandblast(ethelind, esma))\nforall x (Engineer(x, ethelind) and Sandblast(ethelind, minetta) -> Engineer(minetta, winford))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Fritter(x, esma))\nforall x (Engineer(x, winford) -> Mullioned(winford))\n\nnot Fritter(ethelind, esma)\n\nBeaklike(ethelind) and forall x (Beaklike(x) -> Fritter(x, esma)) -> therefore Fritter(ethelind, esma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The margurite coact the gerda. The margurite coact the brian. The margurite is renal. The margurite is perturbed. The margurite amass the gerda. The gerda is monecious. The gerda intrude the robinetta. The gerda amass the brian. The brian coact the margurite. The brian is depicted. The brian amass the margurite. The robinetta coact the gerda. If something is depicted then it amass the robinetta. If something coact the brian then the brian is renal. If something intrude the brian and the brian is depicted then the brian coact the gerda. If something amass the brian and the brian coact the margurite then the margurite amass the robinetta. If something is depicted then it intrude the gerda. If something amass the robinetta then the robinetta is renal. The robinetta is renal.", "logic": "\nCoact(margurite, gerda)\nCoact(margurite, brian)\nRenal(margurite)\nPerturbed(margurite)\nAmass(margurite, gerda)\nMonecious(gerda)\nIntrude(gerda, robinetta)\nAmass(gerda, brian)\nCoact(brian, margurite)\nDepicted(brian)\nAmass(brian, margurite)\nCoact(robinetta, gerda)\nforall x (Depicted(x) -> Amass(x, robinetta))\nforall x (Coact(x, brian) -> Renal(brian))\nforall x (Intrude(x, brian) and Depicted(brian) -> Coact(brian, gerda))\nforall x (Amass(x, brian) and Coact(brian, margurite) -> Amass(margurite, robinetta))\nforall x (Depicted(x) -> Intrude(x, gerda))\nforall x (Amass(x, robinetta) -> Renal(robinetta))\n\nRenal(robinetta)\n\nDepicted(brian) and forall x (Depicted(x) -> Amass(x, robinetta)) -> therefore Amass(brian, robinetta) Amass(brian, robinetta) and forall x (Amass(x, robinetta) -> Renal(robinetta)) -> therefore Renal(robinetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The rahel wrinkle the brittan. The rahel wrinkle the leonerd. The rahel is changeable. The rahel is tuneless. The rahel prevent the brittan. The brittan is azure. The brittan charter the penny. The brittan prevent the leonerd. The leonerd wrinkle the rahel. The leonerd is afoul. The leonerd prevent the rahel. The penny wrinkle the brittan. If something is afoul then it prevent the penny. If something wrinkle the leonerd then the leonerd is changeable. If something charter the leonerd and the leonerd is afoul then the leonerd wrinkle the brittan. If something prevent the leonerd and the leonerd wrinkle the rahel then the rahel prevent the penny. If something is afoul then it charter the brittan. If something prevent the penny then the penny is changeable. The penny is not changeable.", "logic": "\nWrinkle(rahel, brittan)\nWrinkle(rahel, leonerd)\nChangeable(rahel)\nTuneless(rahel)\nPrevent(rahel, brittan)\nAzure(brittan)\nCharter(brittan, penny)\nPrevent(brittan, leonerd)\nWrinkle(leonerd, rahel)\nAfoul(leonerd)\nPrevent(leonerd, rahel)\nWrinkle(penny, brittan)\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Prevent(x, penny))\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, leonerd) -> Changeable(leonerd))\nforall x (Charter(x, leonerd) and Afoul(leonerd) -> Wrinkle(leonerd, brittan))\nforall x (Prevent(x, leonerd) and Wrinkle(leonerd, rahel) -> Prevent(rahel, penny))\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Charter(x, brittan))\nforall x (Prevent(x, penny) -> Changeable(penny))\n\nnot Changeable(penny)\n\nAfoul(leonerd) and forall x (Afoul(x) -> Prevent(x, penny)) -> therefore Prevent(leonerd, penny) Prevent(leonerd, penny) and forall x (Prevent(x, penny) -> Changeable(penny)) -> therefore Changeable(penny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The ned rick the anabel. The ned rick the mahesh. The ned is sportive. The ned is frisian. The ned bachelor the anabel. The anabel is debatable. The anabel research the becka. The anabel bachelor the mahesh. The mahesh rick the ned. The mahesh is chelonian. The mahesh bachelor the ned. The becka rick the anabel. If something is chelonian then it bachelor the becka. If something rick the mahesh then the mahesh is sportive. If something research the mahesh and the mahesh is chelonian then the mahesh rick the anabel. If something bachelor the mahesh and the mahesh rick the ned then the ned bachelor the becka. If something is chelonian then it research the anabel. If something bachelor the becka then the becka is sportive. The anabel does not need the anabel.", "logic": "\nRick(ned, anabel)\nRick(ned, mahesh)\nSportive(ned)\nFrisian(ned)\nBachelor(ned, anabel)\nDebatable(anabel)\nResearch(anabel, becka)\nBachelor(anabel, mahesh)\nRick(mahesh, ned)\nChelonian(mahesh)\nBachelor(mahesh, ned)\nRick(becka, anabel)\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Bachelor(x, becka))\nforall x (Rick(x, mahesh) -> Sportive(mahesh))\nforall x (Research(x, mahesh) and Chelonian(mahesh) -> Rick(mahesh, anabel))\nforall x (Bachelor(x, mahesh) and Rick(mahesh, ned) -> Bachelor(ned, becka))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Research(x, anabel))\nforall x (Bachelor(x, becka) -> Sportive(becka))\n\nnot Research(anabel, anabel)\n\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Research(x, anabel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The jamie bayonet the orelia. The jamie bayonet the abigail. The jamie is urethral. The jamie is synoecious. The jamie bleat the orelia. The orelia is witching. The orelia carnify the reeva. The orelia bleat the abigail. The abigail bayonet the jamie. The abigail is listless. The abigail bleat the jamie. The reeva bayonet the orelia. If something is listless then it bleat the reeva. If something bayonet the abigail then the abigail is urethral. If something carnify the abigail and the abigail is listless then the abigail bayonet the orelia. If something bleat the abigail and the abigail bayonet the jamie then the jamie bleat the reeva. If something is listless then it carnify the orelia. If something bleat the reeva then the reeva is urethral. The abigail bayonet the orelia.", "logic": "\nBayonet(jamie, orelia)\nBayonet(jamie, abigail)\nUrethral(jamie)\nSynoecious(jamie)\nBleat(jamie, orelia)\nWitching(orelia)\nCarnify(orelia, reeva)\nBleat(orelia, abigail)\nBayonet(abigail, jamie)\nListless(abigail)\nBleat(abigail, jamie)\nBayonet(reeva, orelia)\nforall x (Listless(x) -> Bleat(x, reeva))\nforall x (Bayonet(x, abigail) -> Urethral(abigail))\nforall x (Carnify(x, abigail) and Listless(abigail) -> Bayonet(abigail, orelia))\nforall x (Bleat(x, abigail) and Bayonet(abigail, jamie) -> Bleat(jamie, reeva))\nforall x (Listless(x) -> Carnify(x, orelia))\nforall x (Bleat(x, reeva) -> Urethral(reeva))\n\nBayonet(abigail, orelia)\n\nforall x (Carnify(x, abigail) and Listless(abigail) -> Bayonet(abigail, orelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The norbert excerpt the ambrosia. The norbert excerpt the nev. The norbert is frank. The norbert is provident. The norbert snowshoe the ambrosia. The ambrosia is dynastic. The ambrosia defile the romeo. The ambrosia snowshoe the nev. The nev excerpt the norbert. The nev is sheepish. The nev snowshoe the norbert. The romeo excerpt the ambrosia. If something is sheepish then it snowshoe the romeo. If something excerpt the nev then the nev is frank. If something defile the nev and the nev is sheepish then the nev excerpt the ambrosia. If something snowshoe the nev and the nev excerpt the norbert then the norbert snowshoe the romeo. If something is sheepish then it defile the ambrosia. If something snowshoe the romeo then the romeo is frank. The ambrosia does not visit the romeo.", "logic": "\nExcerpt(norbert, ambrosia)\nExcerpt(norbert, nev)\nFrank(norbert)\nProvident(norbert)\nSnowshoe(norbert, ambrosia)\nDynastic(ambrosia)\nDefile(ambrosia, romeo)\nSnowshoe(ambrosia, nev)\nExcerpt(nev, norbert)\nSheepish(nev)\nSnowshoe(nev, norbert)\nExcerpt(romeo, ambrosia)\nforall x (Sheepish(x) -> Snowshoe(x, romeo))\nforall x (Excerpt(x, nev) -> Frank(nev))\nforall x (Defile(x, nev) and Sheepish(nev) -> Excerpt(nev, ambrosia))\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, nev) and Excerpt(nev, norbert) -> Snowshoe(norbert, romeo))\nforall x (Sheepish(x) -> Defile(x, ambrosia))\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, romeo) -> Frank(romeo))\n\nnot Snowshoe(ambrosia, romeo)\n\nforall x (Sheepish(x) -> Snowshoe(x, romeo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The veronique refuse the zacherie. The veronique refuse the dulcinea. The veronique is beauteous. The veronique is liberal. The veronique overtire the zacherie. The zacherie is glazed. The zacherie garble the barris. The zacherie overtire the dulcinea. The dulcinea refuse the veronique. The dulcinea is sloped. The dulcinea overtire the veronique. The barris refuse the zacherie. If something is sloped then it overtire the barris. If something refuse the dulcinea then the dulcinea is beauteous. If something garble the dulcinea and the dulcinea is sloped then the dulcinea refuse the zacherie. If something overtire the dulcinea and the dulcinea refuse the veronique then the veronique overtire the barris. If something is sloped then it garble the zacherie. If something overtire the barris then the barris is beauteous. The barris is red.", "logic": "\nRefuse(veronique, zacherie)\nRefuse(veronique, dulcinea)\nBeauteous(veronique)\nLiberal(veronique)\nOvertire(veronique, zacherie)\nGlazed(zacherie)\nGarble(zacherie, barris)\nOvertire(zacherie, dulcinea)\nRefuse(dulcinea, veronique)\nSloped(dulcinea)\nOvertire(dulcinea, veronique)\nRefuse(barris, zacherie)\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Overtire(x, barris))\nforall x (Refuse(x, dulcinea) -> Beauteous(dulcinea))\nforall x (Garble(x, dulcinea) and Sloped(dulcinea) -> Refuse(dulcinea, zacherie))\nforall x (Overtire(x, dulcinea) and Refuse(dulcinea, veronique) -> Overtire(veronique, barris))\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Garble(x, zacherie))\nforall x (Overtire(x, barris) -> Beauteous(barris))\n\nRed(barris)\n\nRed(barris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The lindy glamour the dimitris. The lindy glamour the friedric. The lindy is uricosuric. The lindy is venous. The lindy stock the dimitris. The dimitris is palmlike. The dimitris attribute the philip. The dimitris stock the friedric. The friedric glamour the lindy. The friedric is away. The friedric stock the lindy. The philip glamour the dimitris. If something is away then it stock the philip. If something glamour the friedric then the friedric is uricosuric. If something attribute the friedric and the friedric is away then the friedric glamour the dimitris. If something stock the friedric and the friedric glamour the lindy then the lindy stock the philip. If something is away then it attribute the dimitris. If something stock the philip then the philip is uricosuric. The philip does not visit the friedric.", "logic": "\nGlamour(lindy, dimitris)\nGlamour(lindy, friedric)\nUricosuric(lindy)\nVenous(lindy)\nStock(lindy, dimitris)\nPalmlike(dimitris)\nAttribute(dimitris, philip)\nStock(dimitris, friedric)\nGlamour(friedric, lindy)\nAway(friedric)\nStock(friedric, lindy)\nGlamour(philip, dimitris)\nforall x (Away(x) -> Stock(x, philip))\nforall x (Glamour(x, friedric) -> Uricosuric(friedric))\nforall x (Attribute(x, friedric) and Away(friedric) -> Glamour(friedric, dimitris))\nforall x (Stock(x, friedric) and Glamour(friedric, lindy) -> Stock(lindy, philip))\nforall x (Away(x) -> Attribute(x, dimitris))\nforall x (Stock(x, philip) -> Uricosuric(philip))\n\nnot Stock(philip, friedric)\n\nnot Stock(philip, friedric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "The dougie felicitate the ashleigh. The dougie felicitate the rachele. The dougie is unpledged. The dougie is darned. The dougie analyze the ashleigh. The ashleigh is bony. The ashleigh underpin the flo. The ashleigh analyze the rachele. The rachele felicitate the dougie. The rachele is copesetic. The rachele analyze the dougie. The flo felicitate the ashleigh. If something is copesetic then it analyze the flo. If something felicitate the rachele then the rachele is unpledged. If something underpin the rachele and the rachele is copesetic then the rachele felicitate the ashleigh. If something analyze the rachele and the rachele felicitate the dougie then the dougie analyze the flo. If something is copesetic then it underpin the ashleigh. If something analyze the flo then the flo is unpledged. The flo is bony.", "logic": "\nFelicitate(dougie, ashleigh)\nFelicitate(dougie, rachele)\nUnpledged(dougie)\nDarned(dougie)\nAnalyze(dougie, ashleigh)\nBony(ashleigh)\nUnderpin(ashleigh, flo)\nAnalyze(ashleigh, rachele)\nFelicitate(rachele, dougie)\nCopesetic(rachele)\nAnalyze(rachele, dougie)\nFelicitate(flo, ashleigh)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Analyze(x, flo))\nforall x (Felicitate(x, rachele) -> Unpledged(rachele))\nforall x (Underpin(x, rachele) and Copesetic(rachele) -> Felicitate(rachele, ashleigh))\nforall x (Analyze(x, rachele) and Felicitate(rachele, dougie) -> Analyze(dougie, flo))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Underpin(x, ashleigh))\nforall x (Analyze(x, flo) -> Unpledged(flo))\n\nBony(flo)\n\nBony(flo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Toni is wieldy. Toni is touristy. Toni is tritanopic. Toni is zambian. Toni is blazing. Toni is complete. Jody is touristy. Jody is tritanopic. Jody is zambian. Jody is complete. All touristy things are wieldy. All complete things are touristy. All touristy, wieldy things are complete. If something is blazing and touristy then it is complete. If Jody is tritanopic then Jody is complete. Blue things are blazing. All etiologic things are zambian. If Jody is blazing then Jody is zambian. Toni is zambian.", "logic": "\nWieldy(toni)\nTouristy(toni)\nTritanopic(toni)\nZambian(toni)\nBlazing(toni)\nComplete(toni)\nTouristy(jody)\nTritanopic(jody)\nZambian(jody)\nComplete(jody)\nforall x (Touristy(x) -> Wieldy(x))\nforall x (Complete(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Touristy(x) and Wieldy(x) -> Complete(x))\nforall x (Blazing(x) and Touristy(x) -> Complete(x))\nTritanopic(jody) -> Complete(jody)\nforall x (Wieldy(x) -> Blazing(x))\nforall x (Etiologic(x) -> Zambian(x))\nBlazing(jody) -> Zambian(jody)\n\nZambian(toni)\n\ntherefore Zambian(toni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Bobbie is riled. Bobbie is oneiric. Bobbie is crackle. Bobbie is brainsick. Bobbie is nipping. Bobbie is interbred. Chuck is oneiric. Chuck is crackle. Chuck is brainsick. Chuck is interbred. All oneiric things are riled. All interbred things are oneiric. All oneiric, riled things are interbred. If something is nipping and oneiric then it is interbred. If Chuck is crackle then Chuck is interbred. Blue things are nipping. All coruscant things are brainsick. If Chuck is nipping then Chuck is brainsick. Chuck is not interbred.", "logic": "\nRiled(bobbie)\nOneiric(bobbie)\nCrackle(bobbie)\nBrainsick(bobbie)\nNipping(bobbie)\nInterbred(bobbie)\nOneiric(chuck)\nCrackle(chuck)\nBrainsick(chuck)\nInterbred(chuck)\nforall x (Oneiric(x) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Interbred(x) -> Oneiric(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Riled(x) -> Interbred(x))\nforall x (Nipping(x) and Oneiric(x) -> Interbred(x))\nCrackle(chuck) -> Interbred(chuck)\nforall x (Riled(x) -> Nipping(x))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) -> Brainsick(x))\nNipping(chuck) -> Brainsick(chuck)\n\nnot Interbred(chuck)\n\ntherefore Interbred(chuck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Yevette is cuneiform. Yevette is tortuous. Yevette is various. Yevette is xxxii. Yevette is deciphered. Yevette is gathered. Brittan is tortuous. Brittan is various. Brittan is xxxii. Brittan is gathered. All tortuous things are cuneiform. All gathered things are tortuous. All tortuous, cuneiform things are gathered. If something is deciphered and tortuous then it is gathered. If Brittan is various then Brittan is gathered. Blue things are deciphered. All humid things are xxxii. If Brittan is deciphered then Brittan is xxxii. Brittan is cuneiform.", "logic": "\nCuneiform(yevette)\nTortuous(yevette)\nVarious(yevette)\nXxxii(yevette)\nDeciphered(yevette)\nGathered(yevette)\nTortuous(brittan)\nVarious(brittan)\nXxxii(brittan)\nGathered(brittan)\nforall x (Tortuous(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Gathered(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Tortuous(x) and Cuneiform(x) -> Gathered(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Tortuous(x) -> Gathered(x))\nVarious(brittan) -> Gathered(brittan)\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Humid(x) -> Xxxii(x))\nDeciphered(brittan) -> Xxxii(brittan)\n\nCuneiform(brittan)\n\nTortuous(brittan) and forall x (Tortuous(x) -> Cuneiform(x)) -> therefore Cuneiform(brittan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Ranee is masked. Ranee is striking. Ranee is segmented. Ranee is pretty. Ranee is supersonic. Ranee is practiced. Rina is striking. Rina is segmented. Rina is pretty. Rina is practiced. All striking things are masked. All practiced things are striking. All striking, masked things are practiced. If something is supersonic and striking then it is practiced. If Rina is segmented then Rina is practiced. Blue things are supersonic. All untrusting things are pretty. If Rina is supersonic then Rina is pretty. Rina is not masked.", "logic": "\nMasked(ranee)\nStriking(ranee)\nSegmented(ranee)\nPretty(ranee)\nSupersonic(ranee)\nPracticed(ranee)\nStriking(rina)\nSegmented(rina)\nPretty(rina)\nPracticed(rina)\nforall x (Striking(x) -> Masked(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) and Masked(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Supersonic(x) and Striking(x) -> Practiced(x))\nSegmented(rina) -> Practiced(rina)\nforall x (Masked(x) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) -> Pretty(x))\nSupersonic(rina) -> Pretty(rina)\n\nnot Masked(rina)\n\nStriking(rina) and forall x (Striking(x) -> Masked(x)) -> therefore Masked(rina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Sergent is oaten. Sergent is epimorphic. Sergent is ridged. Sergent is mouthless. Sergent is buckshee. Sergent is specious. Gardener is epimorphic. Gardener is ridged. Gardener is mouthless. Gardener is specious. All epimorphic things are oaten. All specious things are epimorphic. All epimorphic, oaten things are specious. If something is buckshee and epimorphic then it is specious. If Gardener is ridged then Gardener is specious. Blue things are buckshee. All wistful things are mouthless. If Gardener is buckshee then Gardener is mouthless. Gardener is buckshee.", "logic": "\nOaten(sergent)\nEpimorphic(sergent)\nRidged(sergent)\nMouthless(sergent)\nBuckshee(sergent)\nSpecious(sergent)\nEpimorphic(gardener)\nRidged(gardener)\nMouthless(gardener)\nSpecious(gardener)\nforall x (Epimorphic(x) -> Oaten(x))\nforall x (Specious(x) -> Epimorphic(x))\nforall x (Epimorphic(x) and Oaten(x) -> Specious(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and Epimorphic(x) -> Specious(x))\nRidged(gardener) -> Specious(gardener)\nforall x (Oaten(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Mouthless(x))\nBuckshee(gardener) -> Mouthless(gardener)\n\nBuckshee(gardener)\n\nEpimorphic(gardener) and forall x (Epimorphic(x) -> Oaten(x)) -> therefore Oaten(gardener) Oaten(gardener) and forall x (Oaten(x) -> Buckshee(x)) -> therefore Buckshee(gardener)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Gill is uphill. Gill is neckless. Gill is valued. Gill is sclerotic. Gill is viii. Gill is synthetic. Rene is neckless. Rene is valued. Rene is sclerotic. Rene is synthetic. All neckless things are uphill. All synthetic things are neckless. All neckless, uphill things are synthetic. If something is viii and neckless then it is synthetic. If Rene is valued then Rene is synthetic. Blue things are viii. All damning things are sclerotic. If Rene is viii then Rene is sclerotic. Rene is not viii.", "logic": "\nUphill(gill)\nNeckless(gill)\nValued(gill)\nSclerotic(gill)\nViii(gill)\nSynthetic(gill)\nNeckless(rene)\nValued(rene)\nSclerotic(rene)\nSynthetic(rene)\nforall x (Neckless(x) -> Uphill(x))\nforall x (Synthetic(x) -> Neckless(x))\nforall x (Neckless(x) and Uphill(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nforall x (Viii(x) and Neckless(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nValued(rene) -> Synthetic(rene)\nforall x (Uphill(x) -> Viii(x))\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Sclerotic(x))\nViii(rene) -> Sclerotic(rene)\n\nnot Viii(rene)\n\nNeckless(rene) and forall x (Neckless(x) -> Uphill(x)) -> therefore Uphill(rene) Uphill(rene) and forall x (Uphill(x) -> Viii(x)) -> therefore Viii(rene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Evanne is onomastic. Evanne is crescendo. Evanne is mundane. Evanne is insular. Evanne is perversive. Evanne is apologetic. Caspar is crescendo. Caspar is mundane. Caspar is insular. Caspar is apologetic. All crescendo things are onomastic. All apologetic things are crescendo. All crescendo, onomastic things are apologetic. If something is perversive and crescendo then it is apologetic. If Caspar is mundane then Caspar is apologetic. Blue things are perversive. All lambent things are insular. If Caspar is perversive then Caspar is insular. Evanne is not lambent.", "logic": "\nOnomastic(evanne)\nCrescendo(evanne)\nMundane(evanne)\nInsular(evanne)\nPerversive(evanne)\nApologetic(evanne)\nCrescendo(caspar)\nMundane(caspar)\nInsular(caspar)\nApologetic(caspar)\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Onomastic(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nforall x (Crescendo(x) and Onomastic(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) and Crescendo(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nMundane(caspar) -> Apologetic(caspar)\nforall x (Onomastic(x) -> Perversive(x))\nforall x (Lambent(x) -> Insular(x))\nPerversive(caspar) -> Insular(caspar)\n\nnot Lambent(evanne)\n\nnot Lambent(evanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Liz is anguished. Liz is normal. Liz is carnation. Liz is clangorous. Liz is deafening. Liz is probable. Ellsworth is normal. Ellsworth is carnation. Ellsworth is clangorous. Ellsworth is probable. All normal things are anguished. All probable things are normal. All normal, anguished things are probable. If something is deafening and normal then it is probable. If Ellsworth is carnation then Ellsworth is probable. Blue things are deafening. All foxy things are clangorous. If Ellsworth is deafening then Ellsworth is clangorous. Ellsworth is foxy.", "logic": "\nAnguished(liz)\nNormal(liz)\nCarnation(liz)\nClangorous(liz)\nDeafening(liz)\nProbable(liz)\nNormal(ellsworth)\nCarnation(ellsworth)\nClangorous(ellsworth)\nProbable(ellsworth)\nforall x (Normal(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Probable(x) -> Normal(x))\nforall x (Normal(x) and Anguished(x) -> Probable(x))\nforall x (Deafening(x) and Normal(x) -> Probable(x))\nCarnation(ellsworth) -> Probable(ellsworth)\nforall x (Anguished(x) -> Deafening(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> Clangorous(x))\nDeafening(ellsworth) -> Clangorous(ellsworth)\n\nFoxy(ellsworth)\n\nFoxy(ellsworth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-265"} {"premises": "Madalena is composite. If Madalena is winding then Madalena is boggy. All hyoid, composite things are elegant. If Madalena is composite then Madalena is winding. Madalena is composite.", "logic": "\nComposite(madalena)\nWinding(madalena) -> Boggy(madalena)\nforall x (Hyoid(x) and Composite(x) -> Elegant(x))\nComposite(madalena) -> Winding(madalena)\n\nComposite(madalena)\n\ntherefore Composite(madalena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Alys is unpitying. If Alys is crusted then Alys is hurtful. All divers, unpitying things are italian. If Alys is unpitying then Alys is crusted. Alys is not unpitying.", "logic": "\nUnpitying(alys)\nCrusted(alys) -> Hurtful(alys)\nforall x (Divers(x) and Unpitying(x) -> Italian(x))\nUnpitying(alys) -> Crusted(alys)\n\nnot Unpitying(alys)\n\ntherefore Unpitying(alys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Tabor is ravishing. If Tabor is drooping then Tabor is sedulous. All moslem, ravishing things are unworthy. If Tabor is ravishing then Tabor is drooping. Tabor is drooping.", "logic": "\nRavishing(tabor)\nDrooping(tabor) -> Sedulous(tabor)\nforall x (Moslem(x) and Ravishing(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nRavishing(tabor) -> Drooping(tabor)\n\nDrooping(tabor)\n\nRavishing(tabor) and Ravishing(tabor) -> Drooping(tabor) -> therefore Drooping(tabor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Myrtle is haunted. If Myrtle is minute then Myrtle is doped. All vertical, haunted things are suchlike. If Myrtle is haunted then Myrtle is minute. Myrtle is not minute.", "logic": "\nHaunted(myrtle)\nMinute(myrtle) -> Doped(myrtle)\nforall x (Vertical(x) and Haunted(x) -> Suchlike(x))\nHaunted(myrtle) -> Minute(myrtle)\n\nnot Minute(myrtle)\n\nHaunted(myrtle) and Haunted(myrtle) -> Minute(myrtle) -> therefore Minute(myrtle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Ellissa is butcherly. If Ellissa is castrated then Ellissa is latter. All tasteful, butcherly things are complacent. If Ellissa is butcherly then Ellissa is castrated. Ellissa is latter.", "logic": "\nButcherly(ellissa)\nCastrated(ellissa) -> Latter(ellissa)\nforall x (Tasteful(x) and Butcherly(x) -> Complacent(x))\nButcherly(ellissa) -> Castrated(ellissa)\n\nLatter(ellissa)\n\nButcherly(ellissa) and Butcherly(ellissa) -> Castrated(ellissa) -> therefore Castrated(ellissa) Castrated(ellissa) and Castrated(ellissa) -> Latter(ellissa) -> therefore Latter(ellissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Elfreda is pussy. If Elfreda is wilsonian then Elfreda is procedural. All threadbare, pussy things are christlike. If Elfreda is pussy then Elfreda is wilsonian. Elfreda is not procedural.", "logic": "\nPussy(elfreda)\nWilsonian(elfreda) -> Procedural(elfreda)\nforall x (Threadbare(x) and Pussy(x) -> Christlike(x))\nPussy(elfreda) -> Wilsonian(elfreda)\n\nnot Procedural(elfreda)\n\nPussy(elfreda) and Pussy(elfreda) -> Wilsonian(elfreda) -> therefore Wilsonian(elfreda) Wilsonian(elfreda) and Wilsonian(elfreda) -> Procedural(elfreda) -> therefore Procedural(elfreda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Mariellen is officious. If Mariellen is boozy then Mariellen is censorious. All wildcat, officious things are eternal. If Mariellen is officious then Mariellen is boozy. Mariellen is not eternal.", "logic": "\nOfficious(mariellen)\nBoozy(mariellen) -> Censorious(mariellen)\nforall x (Wildcat(x) and Officious(x) -> Eternal(x))\nOfficious(mariellen) -> Boozy(mariellen)\n\nnot Eternal(mariellen)\n\nforall x (Wildcat(x) and Officious(x) -> Eternal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Emmanuel is hypnogogic. If Emmanuel is esophageal then Emmanuel is leeward. All blithesome, hypnogogic things are plutonian. If Emmanuel is hypnogogic then Emmanuel is esophageal. Emmanuel is furry.", "logic": "\nHypnogogic(emmanuel)\nEsophageal(emmanuel) -> Leeward(emmanuel)\nforall x (Blithesome(x) and Hypnogogic(x) -> Plutonian(x))\nHypnogogic(emmanuel) -> Esophageal(emmanuel)\n\nFurry(emmanuel)\n\nFurry(emmanuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Hollyanne is eventful. If Hollyanne is baneful then Hollyanne is conducive. All acentric, eventful things are tempered. If Hollyanne is eventful then Hollyanne is baneful. Hollyanne is not acentric.", "logic": "\nEventful(hollyanne)\nBaneful(hollyanne) -> Conducive(hollyanne)\nforall x (Acentric(x) and Eventful(x) -> Tempered(x))\nEventful(hollyanne) -> Baneful(hollyanne)\n\nnot Acentric(hollyanne)\n\nnot Acentric(hollyanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Georgena is unpunctual. If Georgena is binding then Georgena is spare. All extendible, unpunctual things are opthalmic. If Georgena is unpunctual then Georgena is binding. Georgena is kind.", "logic": "\nUnpunctual(georgena)\nBinding(georgena) -> Spare(georgena)\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Unpunctual(x) -> Opthalmic(x))\nUnpunctual(georgena) -> Binding(georgena)\n\nKind(georgena)\n\nKind(georgena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "Pedro is foliolate. Pedro is collarless. Pedro is monocled. Pedro is tibetan. Katlin is throated. Katlin is foliolate. Katlin is monocled. If Pedro is fingerlike then Pedro is foliolate. Cold things are throated. If something is monocled then it is wraithlike. If Pedro is monocled then Pedro is wraithlike. If something is collarless and foliolate then it is monocled. All tibetan, fingerlike things are monocled. If something is foliolate and not collarless then it is monocled. All wraithlike things are not fingerlike. Katlin is throated.", "logic": "\nFoliolate(pedro)\nCollarless(pedro)\nMonocled(pedro)\nTibetan(pedro)\nThroated(katlin)\nFoliolate(katlin)\nMonocled(katlin)\nFingerlike(pedro) -> Foliolate(pedro)\nforall x (Collarless(x) -> Throated(x))\nforall x (Monocled(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\nMonocled(pedro) -> Wraithlike(pedro)\nforall x (Collarless(x) and Foliolate(x) -> Monocled(x))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) and Fingerlike(x) -> Monocled(x))\nforall x (Foliolate(x) and not Collarless(x) -> Monocled(x))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) -> not Fingerlike(x))\n\nThroated(katlin)\n\ntherefore Throated(katlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "Ranique is bimetallic. Ranique is marred. Ranique is tagged. Ranique is prolusory. Welbie is bonelike. Welbie is bimetallic. Welbie is tagged. If Ranique is contented then Ranique is bimetallic. Cold things are bonelike. If something is tagged then it is britannic. If Ranique is tagged then Ranique is britannic. If something is marred and bimetallic then it is tagged. All prolusory, contented things are tagged. If something is bimetallic and not marred then it is tagged. All britannic things are not contented. Ranique is not tagged.", "logic": "\nBimetallic(ranique)\nMarred(ranique)\nTagged(ranique)\nProlusory(ranique)\nBonelike(welbie)\nBimetallic(welbie)\nTagged(welbie)\nContented(ranique) -> Bimetallic(ranique)\nforall x (Marred(x) -> Bonelike(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Britannic(x))\nTagged(ranique) -> Britannic(ranique)\nforall x (Marred(x) and Bimetallic(x) -> Tagged(x))\nforall x (Prolusory(x) and Contented(x) -> Tagged(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and not Marred(x) -> Tagged(x))\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> not Contented(x))\n\nnot Tagged(ranique)\n\ntherefore Tagged(ranique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "Uriah is stirred. Uriah is stoic. Uriah is enzymatic. Uriah is unlatched. Stepha is tardive. Stepha is stirred. Stepha is enzymatic. If Uriah is shoaly then Uriah is stirred. Cold things are tardive. If something is enzymatic then it is ampullar. If Uriah is enzymatic then Uriah is ampullar. If something is stoic and stirred then it is enzymatic. All unlatched, shoaly things are enzymatic. If something is stirred and not stoic then it is enzymatic. All ampullar things are not shoaly. Uriah is tardive.", "logic": "\nStirred(uriah)\nStoic(uriah)\nEnzymatic(uriah)\nUnlatched(uriah)\nTardive(stepha)\nStirred(stepha)\nEnzymatic(stepha)\nShoaly(uriah) -> Stirred(uriah)\nforall x (Stoic(x) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Ampullar(x))\nEnzymatic(uriah) -> Ampullar(uriah)\nforall x (Stoic(x) and Stirred(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Unlatched(x) and Shoaly(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Stirred(x) and not Stoic(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Ampullar(x) -> not Shoaly(x))\n\nTardive(uriah)\n\nStoic(uriah) and forall x (Stoic(x) -> Tardive(x)) -> therefore Tardive(uriah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "Edwin is roughdried. Edwin is lathery. Edwin is patent. Edwin is complacent. Aleta is minuscular. Aleta is roughdried. Aleta is patent. If Edwin is pizzicato then Edwin is roughdried. Cold things are minuscular. If something is patent then it is hearsay. If Edwin is patent then Edwin is hearsay. If something is lathery and roughdried then it is patent. All complacent, pizzicato things are patent. If something is roughdried and not lathery then it is patent. All hearsay things are not pizzicato. Edwin is not minuscular.", "logic": "\nRoughdried(edwin)\nLathery(edwin)\nPatent(edwin)\nComplacent(edwin)\nMinuscular(aleta)\nRoughdried(aleta)\nPatent(aleta)\nPizzicato(edwin) -> Roughdried(edwin)\nforall x (Lathery(x) -> Minuscular(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nPatent(edwin) -> Hearsay(edwin)\nforall x (Lathery(x) and Roughdried(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Complacent(x) and Pizzicato(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Roughdried(x) and not Lathery(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) -> not Pizzicato(x))\n\nnot Minuscular(edwin)\n\nLathery(edwin) and forall x (Lathery(x) -> Minuscular(x)) -> therefore Minuscular(edwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "Henrie is decrepit. Henrie is wheaten. Henrie is unturned. Henrie is bituminoid. Kelci is vestmental. Kelci is decrepit. Kelci is unturned. If Henrie is scots then Henrie is decrepit. Cold things are vestmental. If something is unturned then it is highflying. If Henrie is unturned then Henrie is highflying. If something is wheaten and decrepit then it is unturned. All bituminoid, scots things are unturned. If something is decrepit and not wheaten then it is unturned. All highflying things are not scots. Kelci is not scots.", "logic": "\nDecrepit(henrie)\nWheaten(henrie)\nUnturned(henrie)\nBituminoid(henrie)\nVestmental(kelci)\nDecrepit(kelci)\nUnturned(kelci)\nScots(henrie) -> Decrepit(henrie)\nforall x (Wheaten(x) -> Vestmental(x))\nforall x (Unturned(x) -> Highflying(x))\nUnturned(henrie) -> Highflying(henrie)\nforall x (Wheaten(x) and Decrepit(x) -> Unturned(x))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) and Scots(x) -> Unturned(x))\nforall x (Decrepit(x) and not Wheaten(x) -> Unturned(x))\nforall x (Highflying(x) -> not Scots(x))\n\nnot Scots(kelci)\n\nUnturned(kelci) and forall x (Unturned(x) -> Highflying(x)) -> therefore Highflying(kelci) Highflying(kelci) and forall x (Highflying(x) -> not Scots(x)) -> therefore not Scots(kelci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "Arleen is ample. Arleen is pupal. Arleen is yogistic. Arleen is ruandan. Calli is disguised. Calli is ample. Calli is yogistic. If Arleen is piteous then Arleen is ample. Cold things are disguised. If something is yogistic then it is curious. If Arleen is yogistic then Arleen is curious. If something is pupal and ample then it is yogistic. All ruandan, piteous things are yogistic. If something is ample and not pupal then it is yogistic. All curious things are not piteous. Calli is piteous.", "logic": "\nAmple(arleen)\nPupal(arleen)\nYogistic(arleen)\nRuandan(arleen)\nDisguised(calli)\nAmple(calli)\nYogistic(calli)\nPiteous(arleen) -> Ample(arleen)\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Yogistic(x) -> Curious(x))\nYogistic(arleen) -> Curious(arleen)\nforall x (Pupal(x) and Ample(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Piteous(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Ample(x) and not Pupal(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Curious(x) -> not Piteous(x))\n\nPiteous(calli)\n\nYogistic(calli) and forall x (Yogistic(x) -> Curious(x)) -> therefore Curious(calli) Curious(calli) and forall x (Curious(x) -> not Piteous(x)) -> therefore not Piteous(calli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "Daisie is thirtieth. Daisie is bald. Daisie is anomalous. Daisie is tapestried. Gale is closed. Gale is thirtieth. Gale is anomalous. If Daisie is intricate then Daisie is thirtieth. Cold things are closed. If something is anomalous then it is receding. If Daisie is anomalous then Daisie is receding. If something is bald and thirtieth then it is anomalous. All tapestried, intricate things are anomalous. If something is thirtieth and not bald then it is anomalous. All receding things are not intricate. Gale is not tapestried.", "logic": "\nThirtieth(daisie)\nBald(daisie)\nAnomalous(daisie)\nTapestried(daisie)\nClosed(gale)\nThirtieth(gale)\nAnomalous(gale)\nIntricate(daisie) -> Thirtieth(daisie)\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Closed(x))\nforall x (Anomalous(x) -> Receding(x))\nAnomalous(daisie) -> Receding(daisie)\nforall x (Bald(x) and Thirtieth(x) -> Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Tapestried(x) and Intricate(x) -> Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and not Bald(x) -> Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> not Intricate(x))\n\nnot Tapestried(gale)\n\nnot Tapestried(gale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "Dacie is baculiform. Dacie is brazilian. Dacie is triclinic. Dacie is ungodly. Bertrand is mediocre. Bertrand is baculiform. Bertrand is triclinic. If Dacie is sealed then Dacie is baculiform. Cold things are mediocre. If something is triclinic then it is littler. If Dacie is triclinic then Dacie is littler. If something is brazilian and baculiform then it is triclinic. All ungodly, sealed things are triclinic. If something is baculiform and not brazilian then it is triclinic. All littler things are not sealed. Bertrand is brazilian.", "logic": "\nBaculiform(dacie)\nBrazilian(dacie)\nTriclinic(dacie)\nUngodly(dacie)\nMediocre(bertrand)\nBaculiform(bertrand)\nTriclinic(bertrand)\nSealed(dacie) -> Baculiform(dacie)\nforall x (Brazilian(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Triclinic(x) -> Littler(x))\nTriclinic(dacie) -> Littler(dacie)\nforall x (Brazilian(x) and Baculiform(x) -> Triclinic(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) and Sealed(x) -> Triclinic(x))\nforall x (Baculiform(x) and not Brazilian(x) -> Triclinic(x))\nforall x (Littler(x) -> not Sealed(x))\n\nBrazilian(bertrand)\n\nBrazilian(bertrand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1144"} {"premises": "The quigly convoy the latrina. The quigly is lendable. The quigly relyric the renato. The latrina is lendable. The latrina unionise the corena. The corena is fated. The corena does not like the quigly. The corena unionise the latrina. The corena unionise the renato. The renato is oversize. If something relyric the quigly then it is not lendable. If something relyric the corena then it is unthankful. If something unionise the corena then it relyric the corena. The quigly convoy the latrina.", "logic": "\nConvoy(quigly, latrina)\nLendable(quigly)\nRelyric(quigly, renato)\nLendable(latrina)\nUnionise(latrina, corena)\nFated(corena)\nnot Relyric(corena, quigly)\nUnionise(corena, latrina)\nUnionise(corena, renato)\nOversize(renato)\nforall x (Relyric(x, quigly) -> not Lendable(x))\nforall x (Relyric(x, corena) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Unionise(x, corena) -> Relyric(x, corena))\n\nConvoy(quigly, latrina)\n\ntherefore Convoy(quigly, latrina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The clint empathize the felicity. The clint is foregoing. The clint awaken the madella. The felicity is foregoing. The felicity shame the elita. The elita is futuristic. The elita does not like the clint. The elita shame the felicity. The elita shame the madella. The madella is copulatory. If something awaken the clint then it is not foregoing. If something awaken the elita then it is unarguable. If something shame the elita then it awaken the elita. The felicity is not foregoing.", "logic": "\nEmpathize(clint, felicity)\nForegoing(clint)\nAwaken(clint, madella)\nForegoing(felicity)\nShame(felicity, elita)\nFuturistic(elita)\nnot Awaken(elita, clint)\nShame(elita, felicity)\nShame(elita, madella)\nCopulatory(madella)\nforall x (Awaken(x, clint) -> not Foregoing(x))\nforall x (Awaken(x, elita) -> Unarguable(x))\nforall x (Shame(x, elita) -> Awaken(x, elita))\n\nnot Foregoing(felicity)\n\ntherefore Foregoing(felicity)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The celine steel the ismail. The celine is organismal. The celine enforce the jeniffer. The ismail is organismal. The ismail feast the karine. The karine is gawky. The karine does not like the celine. The karine feast the ismail. The karine feast the jeniffer. The jeniffer is settled. If something enforce the celine then it is not organismal. If something enforce the karine then it is capsulated. If something feast the karine then it enforce the karine. The ismail enforce the karine.", "logic": "\nSteel(celine, ismail)\nOrganismal(celine)\nEnforce(celine, jeniffer)\nOrganismal(ismail)\nFeast(ismail, karine)\nGawky(karine)\nnot Enforce(karine, celine)\nFeast(karine, ismail)\nFeast(karine, jeniffer)\nSettled(jeniffer)\nforall x (Enforce(x, celine) -> not Organismal(x))\nforall x (Enforce(x, karine) -> Capsulated(x))\nforall x (Feast(x, karine) -> Enforce(x, karine))\n\nEnforce(ismail, karine)\n\nFeast(ismail, karine) and forall x (Feast(x, karine) -> Enforce(x, karine)) -> therefore Enforce(ismail, karine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The chaunce lateralize the gregg. The chaunce is animist. The chaunce sightsing the jaime. The gregg is animist. The gregg molest the roscoe. The roscoe is corroded. The roscoe does not like the chaunce. The roscoe molest the gregg. The roscoe molest the jaime. The jaime is sisterlike. If something sightsing the chaunce then it is not animist. If something sightsing the roscoe then it is noisome. If something molest the roscoe then it sightsing the roscoe. The gregg does not like the roscoe.", "logic": "\nLateralize(chaunce, gregg)\nAnimist(chaunce)\nSightsing(chaunce, jaime)\nAnimist(gregg)\nMolest(gregg, roscoe)\nCorroded(roscoe)\nnot Sightsing(roscoe, chaunce)\nMolest(roscoe, gregg)\nMolest(roscoe, jaime)\nSisterlike(jaime)\nforall x (Sightsing(x, chaunce) -> not Animist(x))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, roscoe) -> Noisome(x))\nforall x (Molest(x, roscoe) -> Sightsing(x, roscoe))\n\nnot Sightsing(gregg, roscoe)\n\nMolest(gregg, roscoe) and forall x (Molest(x, roscoe) -> Sightsing(x, roscoe)) -> therefore Sightsing(gregg, roscoe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The aleen torch the cheryl. The aleen is insomniac. The aleen displace the ileana. The cheryl is insomniac. The cheryl avert the marcella. The marcella is appareled. The marcella does not like the aleen. The marcella avert the cheryl. The marcella avert the ileana. The ileana is leftist. If something displace the aleen then it is not insomniac. If something displace the marcella then it is gaping. If something avert the marcella then it displace the marcella. The cheryl is gaping.", "logic": "\nTorch(aleen, cheryl)\nInsomniac(aleen)\nDisplace(aleen, ileana)\nInsomniac(cheryl)\nAvert(cheryl, marcella)\nAppareled(marcella)\nnot Displace(marcella, aleen)\nAvert(marcella, cheryl)\nAvert(marcella, ileana)\nLeftist(ileana)\nforall x (Displace(x, aleen) -> not Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Displace(x, marcella) -> Gaping(x))\nforall x (Avert(x, marcella) -> Displace(x, marcella))\n\nGaping(cheryl)\n\nAvert(cheryl, marcella) and forall x (Avert(x, marcella) -> Displace(x, marcella)) -> therefore Displace(cheryl, marcella) Displace(cheryl, marcella) and forall x (Displace(x, marcella) -> Gaping(x)) -> therefore Gaping(cheryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The sharna prepay the queenie. The sharna is tapped. The sharna outstay the ralina. The queenie is tapped. The queenie enlarge the neel. The neel is tartaric. The neel does not like the sharna. The neel enlarge the queenie. The neel enlarge the ralina. The ralina is filarial. If something outstay the sharna then it is not tapped. If something outstay the neel then it is caseous. If something enlarge the neel then it outstay the neel. The queenie is not caseous.", "logic": "\nPrepay(sharna, queenie)\nTapped(sharna)\nOutstay(sharna, ralina)\nTapped(queenie)\nEnlarge(queenie, neel)\nTartaric(neel)\nnot Outstay(neel, sharna)\nEnlarge(neel, queenie)\nEnlarge(neel, ralina)\nFilarial(ralina)\nforall x (Outstay(x, sharna) -> not Tapped(x))\nforall x (Outstay(x, neel) -> Caseous(x))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, neel) -> Outstay(x, neel))\n\nnot Caseous(queenie)\n\nEnlarge(queenie, neel) and forall x (Enlarge(x, neel) -> Outstay(x, neel)) -> therefore Outstay(queenie, neel) Outstay(queenie, neel) and forall x (Outstay(x, neel) -> Caseous(x)) -> therefore Caseous(queenie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The nerte propose the lucilia. The nerte is pauline. The nerte true the igor. The lucilia is pauline. The lucilia preclude the tobie. The tobie is silky. The tobie does not like the nerte. The tobie preclude the lucilia. The tobie preclude the igor. The igor is reasonable. If something true the nerte then it is not pauline. If something true the tobie then it is brazilian. If something preclude the tobie then it true the tobie. The igor is not brazilian.", "logic": "\nPropose(nerte, lucilia)\nPauline(nerte)\nTrue(nerte, igor)\nPauline(lucilia)\nPreclude(lucilia, tobie)\nSilky(tobie)\nnot True(tobie, nerte)\nPreclude(tobie, lucilia)\nPreclude(tobie, igor)\nReasonable(igor)\nforall x (True(x, nerte) -> not Pauline(x))\nforall x (True(x, tobie) -> Brazilian(x))\nforall x (Preclude(x, tobie) -> True(x, tobie))\n\nnot Brazilian(igor)\n\nforall x (True(x, tobie) -> Brazilian(x)) <- forall x (Preclude(x, tobie) -> True(x, tobie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The ivett braille the karim. The ivett is branchial. The ivett disprove the adrian. The karim is branchial. The karim placard the rees. The rees is sugared. The rees does not like the ivett. The rees placard the karim. The rees placard the adrian. The adrian is infirm. If something disprove the ivett then it is not branchial. If something disprove the rees then it is blear. If something placard the rees then it disprove the rees. The ivett is blear.", "logic": "\nBraille(ivett, karim)\nBranchial(ivett)\nDisprove(ivett, adrian)\nBranchial(karim)\nPlacard(karim, rees)\nSugared(rees)\nnot Disprove(rees, ivett)\nPlacard(rees, karim)\nPlacard(rees, adrian)\nInfirm(adrian)\nforall x (Disprove(x, ivett) -> not Branchial(x))\nforall x (Disprove(x, rees) -> Blear(x))\nforall x (Placard(x, rees) -> Disprove(x, rees))\n\nBlear(ivett)\n\nforall x (Disprove(x, rees) -> Blear(x)) <- forall x (Placard(x, rees) -> Disprove(x, rees)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The caprice retrain the udall. The caprice is adnexal. The caprice sink the hal. The udall is adnexal. The udall provision the aubrette. The aubrette is jubilant. The aubrette does not like the caprice. The aubrette provision the udall. The aubrette provision the hal. The hal is poltroon. If something sink the caprice then it is not adnexal. If something sink the aubrette then it is cryptical. If something provision the aubrette then it sink the aubrette. The hal does not like the aubrette.", "logic": "\nRetrain(caprice, udall)\nAdnexal(caprice)\nSink(caprice, hal)\nAdnexal(udall)\nProvision(udall, aubrette)\nJubilant(aubrette)\nnot Sink(aubrette, caprice)\nProvision(aubrette, udall)\nProvision(aubrette, hal)\nPoltroon(hal)\nforall x (Sink(x, caprice) -> not Adnexal(x))\nforall x (Sink(x, aubrette) -> Cryptical(x))\nforall x (Provision(x, aubrette) -> Sink(x, aubrette))\n\nnot Sink(hal, aubrette)\n\nforall x (Provision(x, aubrette) -> Sink(x, aubrette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The rik tell the wilone. The rik is madagascan. The rik avert the cherice. The wilone is madagascan. The wilone primp the florencia. The florencia is broadloom. The florencia does not like the rik. The florencia primp the wilone. The florencia primp the cherice. The cherice is arborical. If something avert the rik then it is not madagascan. If something avert the florencia then it is spurting. If something primp the florencia then it avert the florencia. The cherice tell the cherice.", "logic": "\nTell(rik, wilone)\nMadagascan(rik)\nAvert(rik, cherice)\nMadagascan(wilone)\nPrimp(wilone, florencia)\nBroadloom(florencia)\nnot Avert(florencia, rik)\nPrimp(florencia, wilone)\nPrimp(florencia, cherice)\nArborical(cherice)\nforall x (Avert(x, rik) -> not Madagascan(x))\nforall x (Avert(x, florencia) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Primp(x, florencia) -> Avert(x, florencia))\n\nTell(cherice, cherice)\n\nTell(cherice, cherice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The florida recommence the rolland. The florida is stern. The florida demystify the malory. The rolland is stern. The rolland lysogenize the barbabra. The barbabra is nonplused. The barbabra does not like the florida. The barbabra lysogenize the rolland. The barbabra lysogenize the malory. The malory is unbanded. If something demystify the florida then it is not stern. If something demystify the barbabra then it is beguiled. If something lysogenize the barbabra then it demystify the barbabra. The rolland does not chase the rolland.", "logic": "\nRecommence(florida, rolland)\nStern(florida)\nDemystify(florida, malory)\nStern(rolland)\nLysogenize(rolland, barbabra)\nNonplused(barbabra)\nnot Demystify(barbabra, florida)\nLysogenize(barbabra, rolland)\nLysogenize(barbabra, malory)\nUnbanded(malory)\nforall x (Demystify(x, florida) -> not Stern(x))\nforall x (Demystify(x, barbabra) -> Beguiled(x))\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, barbabra) -> Demystify(x, barbabra))\n\nnot Recommence(rolland, rolland)\n\nnot Recommence(rolland, rolland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The devina snick the amalee. The devina is ramshackle. The devina ridge the audrey. The amalee is ramshackle. The amalee sanction the lucio. The lucio is hedonic. The lucio does not like the devina. The lucio sanction the amalee. The lucio sanction the audrey. The audrey is calando. If something ridge the devina then it is not ramshackle. If something ridge the lucio then it is pagan. If something sanction the lucio then it ridge the lucio. The devina ridge the devina.", "logic": "\nSnick(devina, amalee)\nRamshackle(devina)\nRidge(devina, audrey)\nRamshackle(amalee)\nSanction(amalee, lucio)\nHedonic(lucio)\nnot Ridge(lucio, devina)\nSanction(lucio, amalee)\nSanction(lucio, audrey)\nCalando(audrey)\nforall x (Ridge(x, devina) -> not Ramshackle(x))\nforall x (Ridge(x, lucio) -> Pagan(x))\nforall x (Sanction(x, lucio) -> Ridge(x, lucio))\n\nRidge(devina, devina)\n\nRidge(devina, devina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1198"} {"premises": "The trina limn the oralia. The oralia misapply the trina. The vitoria misapply the trina. If something limn the trina and the trina combust the oralia then the trina is vasomotor. If something limn the trina and it misapply the trina then it combust the trina. If something limn the oralia then the oralia limn the trina. If something limn the oralia and it combust the oralia then the oralia combust the vitoria. If something combust the trina and the trina limn the oralia then the oralia misapply the trina. If something is trillion and it combust the oralia then it combust the vitoria. The oralia misapply the trina.", "logic": "\nLimn(trina, oralia)\nMisapply(oralia, trina)\nMisapply(vitoria, trina)\nforall x (Limn(x, trina) and Combust(trina, oralia) -> Vasomotor(trina))\nforall x (Limn(x, trina) and Misapply(x, trina) -> Combust(x, trina))\nforall x (Limn(x, oralia) -> Limn(oralia, trina))\nforall x (Limn(x, oralia) and Combust(x, oralia) -> Combust(oralia, vitoria))\nforall x (Combust(x, trina) and Limn(trina, oralia) -> Misapply(oralia, trina))\nforall x (Trillion(x) and Combust(x, oralia) -> Combust(x, vitoria))\n\nMisapply(oralia, trina)\n\ntherefore Misapply(oralia, trina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The zaneta fleece the tammie. The tammie chiromance the zaneta. The emmett chiromance the zaneta. If something fleece the zaneta and the zaneta formulate the tammie then the zaneta is choleric. If something fleece the zaneta and it chiromance the zaneta then it formulate the zaneta. If something fleece the tammie then the tammie fleece the zaneta. If something fleece the tammie and it formulate the tammie then the tammie formulate the emmett. If something formulate the zaneta and the zaneta fleece the tammie then the tammie chiromance the zaneta. If something is raptorial and it formulate the tammie then it formulate the emmett. The emmett does not need the zaneta.", "logic": "\nFleece(zaneta, tammie)\nChiromance(tammie, zaneta)\nChiromance(emmett, zaneta)\nforall x (Fleece(x, zaneta) and Formulate(zaneta, tammie) -> Choleric(zaneta))\nforall x (Fleece(x, zaneta) and Chiromance(x, zaneta) -> Formulate(x, zaneta))\nforall x (Fleece(x, tammie) -> Fleece(tammie, zaneta))\nforall x (Fleece(x, tammie) and Formulate(x, tammie) -> Formulate(tammie, emmett))\nforall x (Formulate(x, zaneta) and Fleece(zaneta, tammie) -> Chiromance(tammie, zaneta))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) and Formulate(x, tammie) -> Formulate(x, emmett))\n\nnot Chiromance(emmett, zaneta)\n\ntherefore Chiromance(emmett, zaneta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The carolee swig the nicolea. The nicolea luxuriate the carolee. The tildi luxuriate the carolee. If something swig the carolee and the carolee metricate the nicolea then the carolee is myelinated. If something swig the carolee and it luxuriate the carolee then it metricate the carolee. If something swig the nicolea then the nicolea swig the carolee. If something swig the nicolea and it metricate the nicolea then the nicolea metricate the tildi. If something metricate the carolee and the carolee swig the nicolea then the nicolea luxuriate the carolee. If something is blatant and it metricate the nicolea then it metricate the tildi. The nicolea swig the carolee.", "logic": "\nSwig(carolee, nicolea)\nLuxuriate(nicolea, carolee)\nLuxuriate(tildi, carolee)\nforall x (Swig(x, carolee) and Metricate(carolee, nicolea) -> Myelinated(carolee))\nforall x (Swig(x, carolee) and Luxuriate(x, carolee) -> Metricate(x, carolee))\nforall x (Swig(x, nicolea) -> Swig(nicolea, carolee))\nforall x (Swig(x, nicolea) and Metricate(x, nicolea) -> Metricate(nicolea, tildi))\nforall x (Metricate(x, carolee) and Swig(carolee, nicolea) -> Luxuriate(nicolea, carolee))\nforall x (Blatant(x) and Metricate(x, nicolea) -> Metricate(x, tildi))\n\nSwig(nicolea, carolee)\n\nSwig(carolee, nicolea) and forall x (Swig(x, nicolea) -> Swig(nicolea, carolee)) -> therefore Swig(nicolea, carolee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The winifield secure the jeth. The jeth carburet the winifield. The jacqui carburet the winifield. If something secure the winifield and the winifield fool the jeth then the winifield is xenophobic. If something secure the winifield and it carburet the winifield then it fool the winifield. If something secure the jeth then the jeth secure the winifield. If something secure the jeth and it fool the jeth then the jeth fool the jacqui. If something fool the winifield and the winifield secure the jeth then the jeth carburet the winifield. If something is unexceeded and it fool the jeth then it fool the jacqui. The jeth does not like the winifield.", "logic": "\nSecure(winifield, jeth)\nCarburet(jeth, winifield)\nCarburet(jacqui, winifield)\nforall x (Secure(x, winifield) and Fool(winifield, jeth) -> Xenophobic(winifield))\nforall x (Secure(x, winifield) and Carburet(x, winifield) -> Fool(x, winifield))\nforall x (Secure(x, jeth) -> Secure(jeth, winifield))\nforall x (Secure(x, jeth) and Fool(x, jeth) -> Fool(jeth, jacqui))\nforall x (Fool(x, winifield) and Secure(winifield, jeth) -> Carburet(jeth, winifield))\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) and Fool(x, jeth) -> Fool(x, jacqui))\n\nnot Secure(jeth, winifield)\n\nSecure(winifield, jeth) and forall x (Secure(x, jeth) -> Secure(jeth, winifield)) -> therefore Secure(jeth, winifield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The ruben broker the issie. The issie fuck the ruben. The francoise fuck the ruben. If something broker the ruben and the ruben define the issie then the ruben is manlike. If something broker the ruben and it fuck the ruben then it define the ruben. If something broker the issie then the issie broker the ruben. If something broker the issie and it define the issie then the issie define the francoise. If something define the ruben and the ruben broker the issie then the issie fuck the ruben. If something is grotty and it define the issie then it define the francoise. The issie define the ruben.", "logic": "\nBroker(ruben, issie)\nFuck(issie, ruben)\nFuck(francoise, ruben)\nforall x (Broker(x, ruben) and Define(ruben, issie) -> Manlike(ruben))\nforall x (Broker(x, ruben) and Fuck(x, ruben) -> Define(x, ruben))\nforall x (Broker(x, issie) -> Broker(issie, ruben))\nforall x (Broker(x, issie) and Define(x, issie) -> Define(issie, francoise))\nforall x (Define(x, ruben) and Broker(ruben, issie) -> Fuck(issie, ruben))\nforall x (Grotty(x) and Define(x, issie) -> Define(x, francoise))\n\nDefine(issie, ruben)\n\nBroker(ruben, issie) and forall x (Broker(x, issie) -> Broker(issie, ruben)) -> therefore Broker(issie, ruben) Broker(issie, ruben) and Fuck(issie, ruben) and forall x (Broker(x, ruben) and Fuck(x, ruben) -> Define(x, ruben)) -> therefore Define(issie, ruben)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The heida vitaminise the heidi. The heidi trellis the heida. The wrennie trellis the heida. If something vitaminise the heida and the heida capitulate the heidi then the heida is eurasian. If something vitaminise the heida and it trellis the heida then it capitulate the heida. If something vitaminise the heidi then the heidi vitaminise the heida. If something vitaminise the heidi and it capitulate the heidi then the heidi capitulate the wrennie. If something capitulate the heida and the heida vitaminise the heidi then the heidi trellis the heida. If something is unpotted and it capitulate the heidi then it capitulate the wrennie. The heidi does not see the heida.", "logic": "\nVitaminise(heida, heidi)\nTrellis(heidi, heida)\nTrellis(wrennie, heida)\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, heida) and Capitulate(heida, heidi) -> Eurasian(heida))\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, heida) and Trellis(x, heida) -> Capitulate(x, heida))\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, heidi) -> Vitaminise(heidi, heida))\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, heidi) and Capitulate(x, heidi) -> Capitulate(heidi, wrennie))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, heida) and Vitaminise(heida, heidi) -> Trellis(heidi, heida))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) and Capitulate(x, heidi) -> Capitulate(x, wrennie))\n\nnot Capitulate(heidi, heida)\n\nVitaminise(heida, heidi) and forall x (Vitaminise(x, heidi) -> Vitaminise(heidi, heida)) -> therefore Vitaminise(heidi, heida) Vitaminise(heidi, heida) and Trellis(heidi, heida) and forall x (Vitaminise(x, heida) and Trellis(x, heida) -> Capitulate(x, heida)) -> therefore Capitulate(heidi, heida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The orella equalize the ric. The ric surveil the orella. The sidnee surveil the orella. If something equalize the orella and the orella salve the ric then the orella is faucal. If something equalize the orella and it surveil the orella then it salve the orella. If something equalize the ric then the ric equalize the orella. If something equalize the ric and it salve the ric then the ric salve the sidnee. If something salve the orella and the orella equalize the ric then the ric surveil the orella. If something is thumping and it salve the ric then it salve the sidnee. The ric does not see the sidnee.", "logic": "\nEqualize(orella, ric)\nSurveil(ric, orella)\nSurveil(sidnee, orella)\nforall x (Equalize(x, orella) and Salve(orella, ric) -> Faucal(orella))\nforall x (Equalize(x, orella) and Surveil(x, orella) -> Salve(x, orella))\nforall x (Equalize(x, ric) -> Equalize(ric, orella))\nforall x (Equalize(x, ric) and Salve(x, ric) -> Salve(ric, sidnee))\nforall x (Salve(x, orella) and Equalize(orella, ric) -> Surveil(ric, orella))\nforall x (Thumping(x) and Salve(x, ric) -> Salve(x, sidnee))\n\nnot Salve(ric, sidnee)\n\nforall x (Equalize(x, ric) and Salve(x, ric) -> Salve(ric, sidnee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The horst herald the marinna. The marinna bandy the horst. The katherine bandy the horst. If something herald the horst and the horst seesaw the marinna then the horst is elongate. If something herald the horst and it bandy the horst then it seesaw the horst. If something herald the marinna then the marinna herald the horst. If something herald the marinna and it seesaw the marinna then the marinna seesaw the katherine. If something seesaw the horst and the horst herald the marinna then the marinna bandy the horst. If something is leeward and it seesaw the marinna then it seesaw the katherine. The horst seesaw the katherine.", "logic": "\nHerald(horst, marinna)\nBandy(marinna, horst)\nBandy(katherine, horst)\nforall x (Herald(x, horst) and Seesaw(horst, marinna) -> Elongate(horst))\nforall x (Herald(x, horst) and Bandy(x, horst) -> Seesaw(x, horst))\nforall x (Herald(x, marinna) -> Herald(marinna, horst))\nforall x (Herald(x, marinna) and Seesaw(x, marinna) -> Seesaw(marinna, katherine))\nforall x (Seesaw(x, horst) and Herald(horst, marinna) -> Bandy(marinna, horst))\nforall x (Leeward(x) and Seesaw(x, marinna) -> Seesaw(x, katherine))\n\nSeesaw(horst, katherine)\n\nforall x (Leeward(x) and Seesaw(x, marinna) -> Seesaw(x, katherine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The esau guarantee the garcon. The garcon airbrush the esau. The veriee airbrush the esau. If something guarantee the esau and the esau converge the garcon then the esau is coolheaded. If something guarantee the esau and it airbrush the esau then it converge the esau. If something guarantee the garcon then the garcon guarantee the esau. If something guarantee the garcon and it converge the garcon then the garcon converge the veriee. If something converge the esau and the esau guarantee the garcon then the garcon airbrush the esau. If something is inert and it converge the garcon then it converge the veriee. The veriee does not see the esau.", "logic": "\nGuarantee(esau, garcon)\nAirbrush(garcon, esau)\nAirbrush(veriee, esau)\nforall x (Guarantee(x, esau) and Converge(esau, garcon) -> Coolheaded(esau))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, esau) and Airbrush(x, esau) -> Converge(x, esau))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, garcon) -> Guarantee(garcon, esau))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, garcon) and Converge(x, garcon) -> Converge(garcon, veriee))\nforall x (Converge(x, esau) and Guarantee(esau, garcon) -> Airbrush(garcon, esau))\nforall x (Inert(x) and Converge(x, garcon) -> Converge(x, veriee))\n\nnot Converge(veriee, esau)\n\nforall x (Guarantee(x, esau) and Airbrush(x, esau) -> Converge(x, esau)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The gaston appeal the mylo. The mylo boss the gaston. The leorah boss the gaston. If something appeal the gaston and the gaston bivouac the mylo then the gaston is destroyed. If something appeal the gaston and it boss the gaston then it bivouac the gaston. If something appeal the mylo then the mylo appeal the gaston. If something appeal the mylo and it bivouac the mylo then the mylo bivouac the leorah. If something bivouac the gaston and the gaston appeal the mylo then the mylo boss the gaston. If something is together and it bivouac the mylo then it bivouac the leorah. The mylo is together.", "logic": "\nAppeal(gaston, mylo)\nBoss(mylo, gaston)\nBoss(leorah, gaston)\nforall x (Appeal(x, gaston) and Bivouac(gaston, mylo) -> Destroyed(gaston))\nforall x (Appeal(x, gaston) and Boss(x, gaston) -> Bivouac(x, gaston))\nforall x (Appeal(x, mylo) -> Appeal(mylo, gaston))\nforall x (Appeal(x, mylo) and Bivouac(x, mylo) -> Bivouac(mylo, leorah))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, gaston) and Appeal(gaston, mylo) -> Boss(mylo, gaston))\nforall x (Together(x) and Bivouac(x, mylo) -> Bivouac(x, leorah))\n\nTogether(mylo)\n\nTogether(mylo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The delbert petrify the dane. The dane chorus the delbert. The roberta chorus the delbert. If something petrify the delbert and the delbert winterize the dane then the delbert is chummy. If something petrify the delbert and it chorus the delbert then it winterize the delbert. If something petrify the dane then the dane petrify the delbert. If something petrify the dane and it winterize the dane then the dane winterize the roberta. If something winterize the delbert and the delbert petrify the dane then the dane chorus the delbert. If something is paediatric and it winterize the dane then it winterize the roberta. The roberta is not chummy.", "logic": "\nPetrify(delbert, dane)\nChorus(dane, delbert)\nChorus(roberta, delbert)\nforall x (Petrify(x, delbert) and Winterize(delbert, dane) -> Chummy(delbert))\nforall x (Petrify(x, delbert) and Chorus(x, delbert) -> Winterize(x, delbert))\nforall x (Petrify(x, dane) -> Petrify(dane, delbert))\nforall x (Petrify(x, dane) and Winterize(x, dane) -> Winterize(dane, roberta))\nforall x (Winterize(x, delbert) and Petrify(delbert, dane) -> Chorus(dane, delbert))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) and Winterize(x, dane) -> Winterize(x, roberta))\n\nnot Chummy(roberta)\n\nnot Chummy(roberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The hilton animalise the darrin. The darrin traumatise the hilton. The lezlie traumatise the hilton. If something animalise the hilton and the hilton hunt the darrin then the hilton is chinchy. If something animalise the hilton and it traumatise the hilton then it hunt the hilton. If something animalise the darrin then the darrin animalise the hilton. If something animalise the darrin and it hunt the darrin then the darrin hunt the lezlie. If something hunt the hilton and the hilton animalise the darrin then the darrin traumatise the hilton. If something is bittie and it hunt the darrin then it hunt the lezlie. The hilton traumatise the lezlie.", "logic": "\nAnimalise(hilton, darrin)\nTraumatise(darrin, hilton)\nTraumatise(lezlie, hilton)\nforall x (Animalise(x, hilton) and Hunt(hilton, darrin) -> Chinchy(hilton))\nforall x (Animalise(x, hilton) and Traumatise(x, hilton) -> Hunt(x, hilton))\nforall x (Animalise(x, darrin) -> Animalise(darrin, hilton))\nforall x (Animalise(x, darrin) and Hunt(x, darrin) -> Hunt(darrin, lezlie))\nforall x (Hunt(x, hilton) and Animalise(hilton, darrin) -> Traumatise(darrin, hilton))\nforall x (Bittie(x) and Hunt(x, darrin) -> Hunt(x, lezlie))\n\nTraumatise(hilton, lezlie)\n\nTraumatise(hilton, lezlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Jenelle is mundane. Jenelle is oppressive. Jenelle is not parthian. Josie is unreleased. Menard is not woebegone. Caro is not mundane. Caro is abscessed. Rough things are fleshly. If something is oppressive and not unreleased then it is abscessed. Round things are woebegone. If Caro is woebegone and Caro is not fleshly then Caro is not mundane. If something is parthian and not abscessed then it is not mundane. If something is woebegone and not unreleased then it is mundane. Jenelle is oppressive.", "logic": "\nMundane(jenelle)\nOppressive(jenelle)\nnot Parthian(jenelle)\nUnreleased(josie)\nnot Woebegone(menard)\nnot Mundane(caro)\nAbscessed(caro)\nforall x (Abscessed(x) -> Fleshly(x))\nforall x (Oppressive(x) and not Unreleased(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) -> Woebegone(x))\nWoebegone(caro) and not Fleshly(caro) -> not Mundane(caro)\nforall x (Parthian(x) and not Abscessed(x) -> not Mundane(x))\nforall x (Woebegone(x) and not Unreleased(x) -> Mundane(x))\n\nOppressive(jenelle)\n\ntherefore Oppressive(jenelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Niles is unhearable. Niles is limbed. Niles is not lone. Charmian is mesmerized. Honey is not cherty. Ugo is not unhearable. Ugo is atrocious. Rough things are singhalese. If something is limbed and not mesmerized then it is atrocious. Round things are cherty. If Ugo is cherty and Ugo is not singhalese then Ugo is not unhearable. If something is lone and not atrocious then it is not unhearable. If something is cherty and not mesmerized then it is unhearable. Charmian is not mesmerized.", "logic": "\nUnhearable(niles)\nLimbed(niles)\nnot Lone(niles)\nMesmerized(charmian)\nnot Cherty(honey)\nnot Unhearable(ugo)\nAtrocious(ugo)\nforall x (Atrocious(x) -> Singhalese(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) and not Mesmerized(x) -> Atrocious(x))\nforall x (Singhalese(x) -> Cherty(x))\nCherty(ugo) and not Singhalese(ugo) -> not Unhearable(ugo)\nforall x (Lone(x) and not Atrocious(x) -> not Unhearable(x))\nforall x (Cherty(x) and not Mesmerized(x) -> Unhearable(x))\n\nnot Mesmerized(charmian)\n\ntherefore Mesmerized(charmian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Wandis is neoplastic. Wandis is boozy. Wandis is not verrucose. Shandra is damp. Kirbee is not tasteless. Brandise is not neoplastic. Brandise is creaseless. Rough things are nonextant. If something is boozy and not damp then it is creaseless. Round things are tasteless. If Brandise is tasteless and Brandise is not nonextant then Brandise is not neoplastic. If something is verrucose and not creaseless then it is not neoplastic. If something is tasteless and not damp then it is neoplastic. Brandise is nonextant.", "logic": "\nNeoplastic(wandis)\nBoozy(wandis)\nnot Verrucose(wandis)\nDamp(shandra)\nnot Tasteless(kirbee)\nnot Neoplastic(brandise)\nCreaseless(brandise)\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> Nonextant(x))\nforall x (Boozy(x) and not Damp(x) -> Creaseless(x))\nforall x (Nonextant(x) -> Tasteless(x))\nTasteless(brandise) and not Nonextant(brandise) -> not Neoplastic(brandise)\nforall x (Verrucose(x) and not Creaseless(x) -> not Neoplastic(x))\nforall x (Tasteless(x) and not Damp(x) -> Neoplastic(x))\n\nNonextant(brandise)\n\nCreaseless(brandise) and forall x (Creaseless(x) -> Nonextant(x)) -> therefore Nonextant(brandise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Kerrill is queenlike. Kerrill is stenotic. Kerrill is not cognisable. Marinna is slatternly. Pearline is not recurvate. Kat is not queenlike. Kat is uncoerced. Rough things are disclosed. If something is stenotic and not slatternly then it is uncoerced. Round things are recurvate. If Kat is recurvate and Kat is not disclosed then Kat is not queenlike. If something is cognisable and not uncoerced then it is not queenlike. If something is recurvate and not slatternly then it is queenlike. Kat is not disclosed.", "logic": "\nQueenlike(kerrill)\nStenotic(kerrill)\nnot Cognisable(kerrill)\nSlatternly(marinna)\nnot Recurvate(pearline)\nnot Queenlike(kat)\nUncoerced(kat)\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and not Slatternly(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Disclosed(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nRecurvate(kat) and not Disclosed(kat) -> not Queenlike(kat)\nforall x (Cognisable(x) and not Uncoerced(x) -> not Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and not Slatternly(x) -> Queenlike(x))\n\nnot Disclosed(kat)\n\nUncoerced(kat) and forall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Disclosed(x)) -> therefore Disclosed(kat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Natalia is bootleg. Natalia is smitten. Natalia is not cuddly. Karoline is weepy. Inglebert is not benighted. Aube is not bootleg. Aube is solar. Rough things are remiss. If something is smitten and not weepy then it is solar. Round things are benighted. If Aube is benighted and Aube is not remiss then Aube is not bootleg. If something is cuddly and not solar then it is not bootleg. If something is benighted and not weepy then it is bootleg. Aube is benighted.", "logic": "\nBootleg(natalia)\nSmitten(natalia)\nnot Cuddly(natalia)\nWeepy(karoline)\nnot Benighted(inglebert)\nnot Bootleg(aube)\nSolar(aube)\nforall x (Solar(x) -> Remiss(x))\nforall x (Smitten(x) and not Weepy(x) -> Solar(x))\nforall x (Remiss(x) -> Benighted(x))\nBenighted(aube) and not Remiss(aube) -> not Bootleg(aube)\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and not Solar(x) -> not Bootleg(x))\nforall x (Benighted(x) and not Weepy(x) -> Bootleg(x))\n\nBenighted(aube)\n\nSolar(aube) and forall x (Solar(x) -> Remiss(x)) -> therefore Remiss(aube) Remiss(aube) and forall x (Remiss(x) -> Benighted(x)) -> therefore Benighted(aube)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Rosaline is prize. Rosaline is anticipant. Rosaline is not nagging. Nanete is supervised. Angelica is not fungible. Helene is not prize. Helene is numerate. Rough things are pianissimo. If something is anticipant and not supervised then it is numerate. Round things are fungible. If Helene is fungible and Helene is not pianissimo then Helene is not prize. If something is nagging and not numerate then it is not prize. If something is fungible and not supervised then it is prize. Helene is not fungible.", "logic": "\nPrize(rosaline)\nAnticipant(rosaline)\nnot Nagging(rosaline)\nSupervised(nanete)\nnot Fungible(angelica)\nnot Prize(helene)\nNumerate(helene)\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> Pianissimo(x))\nforall x (Anticipant(x) and not Supervised(x) -> Numerate(x))\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Fungible(x))\nFungible(helene) and not Pianissimo(helene) -> not Prize(helene)\nforall x (Nagging(x) and not Numerate(x) -> not Prize(x))\nforall x (Fungible(x) and not Supervised(x) -> Prize(x))\n\nnot Fungible(helene)\n\nNumerate(helene) and forall x (Numerate(x) -> Pianissimo(x)) -> therefore Pianissimo(helene) Pianissimo(helene) and forall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Fungible(x)) -> therefore Fungible(helene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Lorrayne is baleful. Lorrayne is unfrozen. Lorrayne is not aldehydic. Alla is uncordial. Maryellen is not beamy. Tani is not baleful. Tani is garlicky. Rough things are inexact. If something is unfrozen and not uncordial then it is garlicky. Round things are beamy. If Tani is beamy and Tani is not inexact then Tani is not baleful. If something is aldehydic and not garlicky then it is not baleful. If something is beamy and not uncordial then it is baleful. Maryellen is not garlicky.", "logic": "\nBaleful(lorrayne)\nUnfrozen(lorrayne)\nnot Aldehydic(lorrayne)\nUncordial(alla)\nnot Beamy(maryellen)\nnot Baleful(tani)\nGarlicky(tani)\nforall x (Garlicky(x) -> Inexact(x))\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) and not Uncordial(x) -> Garlicky(x))\nforall x (Inexact(x) -> Beamy(x))\nBeamy(tani) and not Inexact(tani) -> not Baleful(tani)\nforall x (Aldehydic(x) and not Garlicky(x) -> not Baleful(x))\nforall x (Beamy(x) and not Uncordial(x) -> Baleful(x))\n\nnot Garlicky(maryellen)\n\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) and not Uncordial(x) -> Garlicky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Marline is setose. Marline is flossy. Marline is not pelecypod. Oneida is aciculate. Amalee is not otic. Cob is not setose. Cob is mediatory. Rough things are rousseauan. If something is flossy and not aciculate then it is mediatory. Round things are otic. If Cob is otic and Cob is not rousseauan then Cob is not setose. If something is pelecypod and not mediatory then it is not setose. If something is otic and not aciculate then it is setose. Marline is rousseauan.", "logic": "\nSetose(marline)\nFlossy(marline)\nnot Pelecypod(marline)\nAciculate(oneida)\nnot Otic(amalee)\nnot Setose(cob)\nMediatory(cob)\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Rousseauan(x))\nforall x (Flossy(x) and not Aciculate(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Otic(x))\nOtic(cob) and not Rousseauan(cob) -> not Setose(cob)\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) and not Mediatory(x) -> not Setose(x))\nforall x (Otic(x) and not Aciculate(x) -> Setose(x))\n\nRousseauan(marline)\n\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Rousseauan(x)) <- forall x (Flossy(x) and not Aciculate(x) -> Mediatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Sawyer is congested. Sawyer is prosperous. Sawyer is not aflare. Johann is yemeni. Geraldine is not ungoverned. Carmen is not congested. Carmen is tzarist. Rough things are pedigreed. If something is prosperous and not yemeni then it is tzarist. Round things are ungoverned. If Carmen is ungoverned and Carmen is not pedigreed then Carmen is not congested. If something is aflare and not tzarist then it is not congested. If something is ungoverned and not yemeni then it is congested. Geraldine is not pedigreed.", "logic": "\nCongested(sawyer)\nProsperous(sawyer)\nnot Aflare(sawyer)\nYemeni(johann)\nnot Ungoverned(geraldine)\nnot Congested(carmen)\nTzarist(carmen)\nforall x (Tzarist(x) -> Pedigreed(x))\nforall x (Prosperous(x) and not Yemeni(x) -> Tzarist(x))\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nUngoverned(carmen) and not Pedigreed(carmen) -> not Congested(carmen)\nforall x (Aflare(x) and not Tzarist(x) -> not Congested(x))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and not Yemeni(x) -> Congested(x))\n\nnot Pedigreed(geraldine)\n\nforall x (Tzarist(x) -> Pedigreed(x)) <- forall x (Prosperous(x) and not Yemeni(x) -> Tzarist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Marjorie is stemless. Marjorie is monarchal. Marjorie is not harmonious. Engelbert is superhuman. Brent is not epidural. Conroy is not stemless. Conroy is steepish. Rough things are editorial. If something is monarchal and not superhuman then it is steepish. Round things are epidural. If Conroy is epidural and Conroy is not editorial then Conroy is not stemless. If something is harmonious and not steepish then it is not stemless. If something is epidural and not superhuman then it is stemless. Engelbert is harmonious.", "logic": "\nStemless(marjorie)\nMonarchal(marjorie)\nnot Harmonious(marjorie)\nSuperhuman(engelbert)\nnot Epidural(brent)\nnot Stemless(conroy)\nSteepish(conroy)\nforall x (Steepish(x) -> Editorial(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) and not Superhuman(x) -> Steepish(x))\nforall x (Editorial(x) -> Epidural(x))\nEpidural(conroy) and not Editorial(conroy) -> not Stemless(conroy)\nforall x (Harmonious(x) and not Steepish(x) -> not Stemless(x))\nforall x (Epidural(x) and not Superhuman(x) -> Stemless(x))\n\nHarmonious(engelbert)\n\nHarmonious(engelbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Vena is capitular. Vena is cutting. Vena is not unawakened. Aub is unworkable. Kania is not inelegant. Udell is not capitular. Udell is plain. Rough things are perfumed. If something is cutting and not unworkable then it is plain. Round things are inelegant. If Udell is inelegant and Udell is not perfumed then Udell is not capitular. If something is unawakened and not plain then it is not capitular. If something is inelegant and not unworkable then it is capitular. Kania is not unawakened.", "logic": "\nCapitular(vena)\nCutting(vena)\nnot Unawakened(vena)\nUnworkable(aub)\nnot Inelegant(kania)\nnot Capitular(udell)\nPlain(udell)\nforall x (Plain(x) -> Perfumed(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) and not Unworkable(x) -> Plain(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Inelegant(x))\nInelegant(udell) and not Perfumed(udell) -> not Capitular(udell)\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and not Plain(x) -> not Capitular(x))\nforall x (Inelegant(x) and not Unworkable(x) -> Capitular(x))\n\nnot Unawakened(kania)\n\nnot Unawakened(kania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Rubina is naturistic. Rubina is thundery. Rubina is not bearing. Iris is bobtailed. Spenser is not centesimal. Quill is not naturistic. Quill is retral. Rough things are sinewy. If something is thundery and not bobtailed then it is retral. Round things are centesimal. If Quill is centesimal and Quill is not sinewy then Quill is not naturistic. If something is bearing and not retral then it is not naturistic. If something is centesimal and not bobtailed then it is naturistic. Iris is thundery.", "logic": "\nNaturistic(rubina)\nThundery(rubina)\nnot Bearing(rubina)\nBobtailed(iris)\nnot Centesimal(spenser)\nnot Naturistic(quill)\nRetral(quill)\nforall x (Retral(x) -> Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and not Bobtailed(x) -> Retral(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Centesimal(x))\nCentesimal(quill) and not Sinewy(quill) -> not Naturistic(quill)\nforall x (Bearing(x) and not Retral(x) -> not Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and not Bobtailed(x) -> Naturistic(x))\n\nThundery(iris)\n\nThundery(iris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Maison is biotic. Maison is dianoetic. Maison is prolonged. Maison is ranking. Xaviera is totalistic. Xaviera is dianoetic. Xaviera is prolonged. Quiet people are biotic. All totalistic, dianoetic people are ranking. If Maison is totalistic and Maison is wiccan then Maison is foreign. If Xaviera is prolonged then Xaviera is dianoetic. All biotic, dianoetic people are foreign. If someone is biotic and dianoetic then they are wiccan. Maison is biotic.", "logic": "\nBiotic(maison)\nDianoetic(maison)\nProlonged(maison)\nRanking(maison)\nTotalistic(xaviera)\nDianoetic(xaviera)\nProlonged(xaviera)\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) -> Biotic(x))\nforall x (Totalistic(x) and Dianoetic(x) -> Ranking(x))\nTotalistic(maison) and Wiccan(maison) -> Foreign(maison)\nProlonged(xaviera) -> Dianoetic(xaviera)\nforall x (Biotic(x) and Dianoetic(x) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Biotic(x) and Dianoetic(x) -> Wiccan(x))\n\nBiotic(maison)\n\ntherefore Biotic(maison)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1621"} {"premises": "Sigfried is intrastate. Sigfried is sintered. Sigfried is leeward. Sigfried is overfond. Shauna is graded. Shauna is sintered. Shauna is leeward. Quiet people are intrastate. All graded, sintered people are overfond. If Sigfried is graded and Sigfried is unlobed then Sigfried is greatest. If Shauna is leeward then Shauna is sintered. All intrastate, sintered people are greatest. If someone is intrastate and sintered then they are unlobed. Shauna is not sintered.", "logic": "\nIntrastate(sigfried)\nSintered(sigfried)\nLeeward(sigfried)\nOverfond(sigfried)\nGraded(shauna)\nSintered(shauna)\nLeeward(shauna)\nforall x (Sintered(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Graded(x) and Sintered(x) -> Overfond(x))\nGraded(sigfried) and Unlobed(sigfried) -> Greatest(sigfried)\nLeeward(shauna) -> Sintered(shauna)\nforall x (Intrastate(x) and Sintered(x) -> Greatest(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) and Sintered(x) -> Unlobed(x))\n\nnot Sintered(shauna)\n\ntherefore Sintered(shauna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1621"} {"premises": "Lindie is untempting. Lindie is winey. Lindie is tenuous. Lindie is hardheaded. Murial is sedate. Murial is winey. Murial is tenuous. Quiet people are untempting. All sedate, winey people are hardheaded. If Lindie is sedate and Lindie is gilt then Lindie is miraculous. If Murial is tenuous then Murial is winey. All untempting, winey people are miraculous. If someone is untempting and winey then they are gilt. Lindie is miraculous.", "logic": "\nUntempting(lindie)\nWiney(lindie)\nTenuous(lindie)\nHardheaded(lindie)\nSedate(murial)\nWiney(murial)\nTenuous(murial)\nforall x (Winey(x) -> Untempting(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) and Winey(x) -> Hardheaded(x))\nSedate(lindie) and Gilt(lindie) -> Miraculous(lindie)\nTenuous(murial) -> Winey(murial)\nforall x (Untempting(x) and Winey(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) and Winey(x) -> Gilt(x))\n\nMiraculous(lindie)\n\nUntempting(lindie) and Winey(lindie) and forall x (Untempting(x) and Winey(x) -> Miraculous(x)) -> therefore Miraculous(lindie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1621"} {"premises": "Samara is apnoeic. Samara is splattered. Samara is oversewn. Samara is benefic. Tiler is rotted. Tiler is splattered. Tiler is oversewn. Quiet people are apnoeic. All rotted, splattered people are benefic. If Samara is rotted and Samara is insightful then Samara is vowellike. If Tiler is oversewn then Tiler is splattered. All apnoeic, splattered people are vowellike. If someone is apnoeic and splattered then they are insightful. Samara is not vowellike.", "logic": "\nApnoeic(samara)\nSplattered(samara)\nOversewn(samara)\nBenefic(samara)\nRotted(tiler)\nSplattered(tiler)\nOversewn(tiler)\nforall x (Splattered(x) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Rotted(x) and Splattered(x) -> Benefic(x))\nRotted(samara) and Insightful(samara) -> Vowellike(samara)\nOversewn(tiler) -> Splattered(tiler)\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) and Splattered(x) -> Vowellike(x))\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) and Splattered(x) -> Insightful(x))\n\nnot Vowellike(samara)\n\nApnoeic(samara) and Splattered(samara) and forall x (Apnoeic(x) and Splattered(x) -> Vowellike(x)) -> therefore Vowellike(samara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1621"} {"premises": "Marlon is regal. Marlon is witchlike. Marlon is wide. Marlon is prankish. Laina is decorated. Laina is witchlike. Laina is wide. Quiet people are regal. All decorated, witchlike people are prankish. If Marlon is decorated and Marlon is gradatory then Marlon is bedaubed. If Laina is wide then Laina is witchlike. All regal, witchlike people are bedaubed. If someone is regal and witchlike then they are gradatory. Laina is gradatory.", "logic": "\nRegal(marlon)\nWitchlike(marlon)\nWide(marlon)\nPrankish(marlon)\nDecorated(laina)\nWitchlike(laina)\nWide(laina)\nforall x (Witchlike(x) -> Regal(x))\nforall x (Decorated(x) and Witchlike(x) -> Prankish(x))\nDecorated(marlon) and Gradatory(marlon) -> Bedaubed(marlon)\nWide(laina) -> Witchlike(laina)\nforall x (Regal(x) and Witchlike(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Regal(x) and Witchlike(x) -> Gradatory(x))\n\nGradatory(laina)\n\nWitchlike(laina) and forall x (Witchlike(x) -> Regal(x)) -> therefore Regal(laina) Regal(laina) and Witchlike(laina) and forall x (Regal(x) and Witchlike(x) -> Gradatory(x)) -> therefore Gradatory(laina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1621"} {"premises": "Gilberto is maltreated. Gilberto is brut. Gilberto is demure. Gilberto is askant. Tomi is splashy. Tomi is brut. Tomi is demure. Quiet people are maltreated. All splashy, brut people are askant. If Gilberto is splashy and Gilberto is eleventh then Gilberto is esurient. If Tomi is demure then Tomi is brut. All maltreated, brut people are esurient. If someone is maltreated and brut then they are eleventh. Tomi is not esurient.", "logic": "\nMaltreated(gilberto)\nBrut(gilberto)\nDemure(gilberto)\nAskant(gilberto)\nSplashy(tomi)\nBrut(tomi)\nDemure(tomi)\nforall x (Brut(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nforall x (Splashy(x) and Brut(x) -> Askant(x))\nSplashy(gilberto) and Eleventh(gilberto) -> Esurient(gilberto)\nDemure(tomi) -> Brut(tomi)\nforall x (Maltreated(x) and Brut(x) -> Esurient(x))\nforall x (Maltreated(x) and Brut(x) -> Eleventh(x))\n\nnot Esurient(tomi)\n\nBrut(tomi) and forall x (Brut(x) -> Maltreated(x)) -> therefore Maltreated(tomi) Maltreated(tomi) and Brut(tomi) and forall x (Maltreated(x) and Brut(x) -> Esurient(x)) -> therefore Esurient(tomi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1621"} {"premises": "Gloriana is lipotropic. Gloriana is jugular. Gloriana is gladdened. Gloriana is untraveled. Gloriana is dignifying. Rosy is lipotropic. Rosy is jugular. Rosy is gladdened. Rosy is untraveled. Rosy is unarmed. Rosy is dignifying. Rosy is chartreuse. Kind, dignifying things are unarmed. If something is gladdened then it is unarmed. All unarmed things are chartreuse. Rosy is chartreuse.", "logic": "\nLipotropic(gloriana)\nJugular(gloriana)\nGladdened(gloriana)\nUntraveled(gloriana)\nDignifying(gloriana)\nLipotropic(rosy)\nJugular(rosy)\nGladdened(rosy)\nUntraveled(rosy)\nUnarmed(rosy)\nDignifying(rosy)\nChartreuse(rosy)\nforall x (Jugular(x) and Dignifying(x) -> Unarmed(x))\nforall x (Gladdened(x) -> Unarmed(x))\nforall x (Unarmed(x) -> Chartreuse(x))\n\nChartreuse(rosy)\n\ntherefore Chartreuse(rosy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-43"} {"premises": "Jody is jelled. Jody is decreasing. Jody is gordian. Jody is takeout. Jody is brocaded. Sheril is jelled. Sheril is decreasing. Sheril is gordian. Sheril is takeout. Sheril is bastardly. Sheril is brocaded. Sheril is bountiful. Kind, brocaded things are bastardly. If something is gordian then it is bastardly. All bastardly things are bountiful. Jody is not decreasing.", "logic": "\nJelled(jody)\nDecreasing(jody)\nGordian(jody)\nTakeout(jody)\nBrocaded(jody)\nJelled(sheril)\nDecreasing(sheril)\nGordian(sheril)\nTakeout(sheril)\nBastardly(sheril)\nBrocaded(sheril)\nBountiful(sheril)\nforall x (Decreasing(x) and Brocaded(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Gordian(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> Bountiful(x))\n\nnot Decreasing(jody)\n\ntherefore Decreasing(jody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-43"} {"premises": "Basil is specified. Basil is altissimo. Basil is planned. Basil is gonzo. Basil is brushlike. Murray is specified. Murray is altissimo. Murray is planned. Murray is gonzo. Murray is gloomful. Murray is brushlike. Murray is spacious. Kind, brushlike things are gloomful. If something is planned then it is gloomful. All gloomful things are spacious. Basil is gloomful.", "logic": "\nSpecified(basil)\nAltissimo(basil)\nPlanned(basil)\nGonzo(basil)\nBrushlike(basil)\nSpecified(murray)\nAltissimo(murray)\nPlanned(murray)\nGonzo(murray)\nGloomful(murray)\nBrushlike(murray)\nSpacious(murray)\nforall x (Altissimo(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Gloomful(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) -> Gloomful(x))\nforall x (Gloomful(x) -> Spacious(x))\n\nGloomful(basil)\n\nPlanned(basil) and forall x (Planned(x) -> Gloomful(x)) -> therefore Gloomful(basil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-43"} {"premises": "Janella is galilaean. Janella is afire. Janella is coupled. Janella is caulescent. Janella is suave. Florencia is galilaean. Florencia is afire. Florencia is coupled. Florencia is caulescent. Florencia is tailed. Florencia is suave. Florencia is unwomanly. Kind, suave things are tailed. If something is coupled then it is tailed. All tailed things are unwomanly. Janella is not tailed.", "logic": "\nGalilaean(janella)\nAfire(janella)\nCoupled(janella)\nCaulescent(janella)\nSuave(janella)\nGalilaean(florencia)\nAfire(florencia)\nCoupled(florencia)\nCaulescent(florencia)\nTailed(florencia)\nSuave(florencia)\nUnwomanly(florencia)\nforall x (Afire(x) and Suave(x) -> Tailed(x))\nforall x (Coupled(x) -> Tailed(x))\nforall x (Tailed(x) -> Unwomanly(x))\n\nnot Tailed(janella)\n\nCoupled(janella) and forall x (Coupled(x) -> Tailed(x)) -> therefore Tailed(janella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-43"} {"premises": "Benni is imminent. Benni is supportive. Benni is dropsical. Benni is tetragonal. Benni is chancy. Ahmad is imminent. Ahmad is supportive. Ahmad is dropsical. Ahmad is tetragonal. Ahmad is priceless. Ahmad is chancy. Ahmad is adolescent. Kind, chancy things are priceless. If something is dropsical then it is priceless. All priceless things are adolescent. Benni is adolescent.", "logic": "\nImminent(benni)\nSupportive(benni)\nDropsical(benni)\nTetragonal(benni)\nChancy(benni)\nImminent(ahmad)\nSupportive(ahmad)\nDropsical(ahmad)\nTetragonal(ahmad)\nPriceless(ahmad)\nChancy(ahmad)\nAdolescent(ahmad)\nforall x (Supportive(x) and Chancy(x) -> Priceless(x))\nforall x (Dropsical(x) -> Priceless(x))\nforall x (Priceless(x) -> Adolescent(x))\n\nAdolescent(benni)\n\nDropsical(benni) and forall x (Dropsical(x) -> Priceless(x)) -> therefore Priceless(benni) Priceless(benni) and forall x (Priceless(x) -> Adolescent(x)) -> therefore Adolescent(benni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-43"} {"premises": "Amabelle is thrombosed. Amabelle is sublingual. Amabelle is beastly. Amabelle is tyrolese. Amabelle is humanist. Chadwick is thrombosed. Chadwick is sublingual. Chadwick is beastly. Chadwick is tyrolese. Chadwick is ocher. Chadwick is humanist. Chadwick is cackly. Kind, humanist things are ocher. If something is beastly then it is ocher. All ocher things are cackly. Amabelle is not cackly.", "logic": "\nThrombosed(amabelle)\nSublingual(amabelle)\nBeastly(amabelle)\nTyrolese(amabelle)\nHumanist(amabelle)\nThrombosed(chadwick)\nSublingual(chadwick)\nBeastly(chadwick)\nTyrolese(chadwick)\nOcher(chadwick)\nHumanist(chadwick)\nCackly(chadwick)\nforall x (Sublingual(x) and Humanist(x) -> Ocher(x))\nforall x (Beastly(x) -> Ocher(x))\nforall x (Ocher(x) -> Cackly(x))\n\nnot Cackly(amabelle)\n\nBeastly(amabelle) and forall x (Beastly(x) -> Ocher(x)) -> therefore Ocher(amabelle) Ocher(amabelle) and forall x (Ocher(x) -> Cackly(x)) -> therefore Cackly(amabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-43"} {"premises": "The pete attribute the karisa. The friedrick is monastic. The karisa is pondering. If someone decolour the friedrick and they eat the friedrick then the friedrick readjust the karisa. If the friedrick is humongous then the friedrick readjust the karisa. If the pete decolour the karisa and the pete decolour the friedrick then the karisa readjust the pete. If someone readjust the karisa then they visit the pete. If someone attribute the pete then they visit the friedrick. If someone attribute the karisa then they like the karisa. The pete attribute the karisa.", "logic": "\nAttribute(pete, karisa)\nMonastic(friedrick)\nPondering(karisa)\nforall x (Decolour(x, friedrick) and Attribute(x, friedrick) -> Readjust(friedrick, karisa))\nHumongous(friedrick) -> Readjust(friedrick, karisa)\nDecolour(pete, karisa) and Decolour(pete, friedrick) -> Readjust(karisa, pete)\nforall x (Readjust(x, karisa) -> Decolour(x, pete))\nforall x (Attribute(x, pete) -> Decolour(x, friedrick))\nforall x (Attribute(x, karisa) -> Readjust(x, karisa))\n\nAttribute(pete, karisa)\n\ntherefore Attribute(pete, karisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The alain berry the deborah. The atlante is liveried. The deborah is romaic. If someone convolve the atlante and they eat the atlante then the atlante endeavour the deborah. If the atlante is mastoid then the atlante endeavour the deborah. If the alain convolve the deborah and the alain convolve the atlante then the deborah endeavour the alain. If someone endeavour the deborah then they visit the alain. If someone berry the alain then they visit the atlante. If someone berry the deborah then they like the deborah. The atlante is not liveried.", "logic": "\nBerry(alain, deborah)\nLiveried(atlante)\nRomaic(deborah)\nforall x (Convolve(x, atlante) and Berry(x, atlante) -> Endeavour(atlante, deborah))\nMastoid(atlante) -> Endeavour(atlante, deborah)\nConvolve(alain, deborah) and Convolve(alain, atlante) -> Endeavour(deborah, alain)\nforall x (Endeavour(x, deborah) -> Convolve(x, alain))\nforall x (Berry(x, alain) -> Convolve(x, atlante))\nforall x (Berry(x, deborah) -> Endeavour(x, deborah))\n\nnot Liveried(atlante)\n\ntherefore Liveried(atlante)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The shayna hood the costa. The horatia is oppressed. The costa is teenage. If someone engild the horatia and they eat the horatia then the horatia encrimson the costa. If the horatia is duteous then the horatia encrimson the costa. If the shayna engild the costa and the shayna engild the horatia then the costa encrimson the shayna. If someone encrimson the costa then they visit the shayna. If someone hood the shayna then they visit the horatia. If someone hood the costa then they like the costa. The shayna encrimson the costa.", "logic": "\nHood(shayna, costa)\nOppressed(horatia)\nTeenage(costa)\nforall x (Engild(x, horatia) and Hood(x, horatia) -> Encrimson(horatia, costa))\nDuteous(horatia) -> Encrimson(horatia, costa)\nEngild(shayna, costa) and Engild(shayna, horatia) -> Encrimson(costa, shayna)\nforall x (Encrimson(x, costa) -> Engild(x, shayna))\nforall x (Hood(x, shayna) -> Engild(x, horatia))\nforall x (Hood(x, costa) -> Encrimson(x, costa))\n\nEncrimson(shayna, costa)\n\nHood(shayna, costa) and forall x (Hood(x, costa) -> Encrimson(x, costa)) -> therefore Encrimson(shayna, costa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The lindsay houseclean the valerie. The anni is subgross. The valerie is taiwanese. If someone quarantine the anni and they eat the anni then the anni carburet the valerie. If the anni is unbaffled then the anni carburet the valerie. If the lindsay quarantine the valerie and the lindsay quarantine the anni then the valerie carburet the lindsay. If someone carburet the valerie then they visit the lindsay. If someone houseclean the lindsay then they visit the anni. If someone houseclean the valerie then they like the valerie. The lindsay does not like the valerie.", "logic": "\nHouseclean(lindsay, valerie)\nSubgross(anni)\nTaiwanese(valerie)\nforall x (Quarantine(x, anni) and Houseclean(x, anni) -> Carburet(anni, valerie))\nUnbaffled(anni) -> Carburet(anni, valerie)\nQuarantine(lindsay, valerie) and Quarantine(lindsay, anni) -> Carburet(valerie, lindsay)\nforall x (Carburet(x, valerie) -> Quarantine(x, lindsay))\nforall x (Houseclean(x, lindsay) -> Quarantine(x, anni))\nforall x (Houseclean(x, valerie) -> Carburet(x, valerie))\n\nnot Carburet(lindsay, valerie)\n\nHouseclean(lindsay, valerie) and forall x (Houseclean(x, valerie) -> Carburet(x, valerie)) -> therefore Carburet(lindsay, valerie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The constance doff the vale. The rebecka is drained. The vale is barky. If someone proof the rebecka and they eat the rebecka then the rebecka wound the vale. If the rebecka is undatable then the rebecka wound the vale. If the constance proof the vale and the constance proof the rebecka then the vale wound the constance. If someone wound the vale then they visit the constance. If someone doff the constance then they visit the rebecka. If someone doff the vale then they like the vale. The constance proof the constance.", "logic": "\nDoff(constance, vale)\nDrained(rebecka)\nBarky(vale)\nforall x (Proof(x, rebecka) and Doff(x, rebecka) -> Wound(rebecka, vale))\nUndatable(rebecka) -> Wound(rebecka, vale)\nProof(constance, vale) and Proof(constance, rebecka) -> Wound(vale, constance)\nforall x (Wound(x, vale) -> Proof(x, constance))\nforall x (Doff(x, constance) -> Proof(x, rebecka))\nforall x (Doff(x, vale) -> Wound(x, vale))\n\nProof(constance, constance)\n\nDoff(constance, vale) and forall x (Doff(x, vale) -> Wound(x, vale)) -> therefore Wound(constance, vale) Wound(constance, vale) and forall x (Wound(x, vale) -> Proof(x, constance)) -> therefore Proof(constance, constance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The yancey palaver the karin. The sholom is matchless. The karin is meaning. If someone isolate the sholom and they eat the sholom then the sholom dehumanise the karin. If the sholom is pudgy then the sholom dehumanise the karin. If the yancey isolate the karin and the yancey isolate the sholom then the karin dehumanise the yancey. If someone dehumanise the karin then they visit the yancey. If someone palaver the yancey then they visit the sholom. If someone palaver the karin then they like the karin. The yancey does not visit the yancey.", "logic": "\nPalaver(yancey, karin)\nMatchless(sholom)\nMeaning(karin)\nforall x (Isolate(x, sholom) and Palaver(x, sholom) -> Dehumanise(sholom, karin))\nPudgy(sholom) -> Dehumanise(sholom, karin)\nIsolate(yancey, karin) and Isolate(yancey, sholom) -> Dehumanise(karin, yancey)\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, karin) -> Isolate(x, yancey))\nforall x (Palaver(x, yancey) -> Isolate(x, sholom))\nforall x (Palaver(x, karin) -> Dehumanise(x, karin))\n\nnot Isolate(yancey, yancey)\n\nPalaver(yancey, karin) and forall x (Palaver(x, karin) -> Dehumanise(x, karin)) -> therefore Dehumanise(yancey, karin) Dehumanise(yancey, karin) and forall x (Dehumanise(x, karin) -> Isolate(x, yancey)) -> therefore Isolate(yancey, yancey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The istvan appease the cappella. The wilfrid is majuscular. The cappella is libyan. If someone lollop the wilfrid and they eat the wilfrid then the wilfrid declaim the cappella. If the wilfrid is clumsy then the wilfrid declaim the cappella. If the istvan lollop the cappella and the istvan lollop the wilfrid then the cappella declaim the istvan. If someone declaim the cappella then they visit the istvan. If someone appease the istvan then they visit the wilfrid. If someone appease the cappella then they like the cappella. The wilfrid does not like the cappella.", "logic": "\nAppease(istvan, cappella)\nMajuscular(wilfrid)\nLibyan(cappella)\nforall x (Lollop(x, wilfrid) and Appease(x, wilfrid) -> Declaim(wilfrid, cappella))\nClumsy(wilfrid) -> Declaim(wilfrid, cappella)\nLollop(istvan, cappella) and Lollop(istvan, wilfrid) -> Declaim(cappella, istvan)\nforall x (Declaim(x, cappella) -> Lollop(x, istvan))\nforall x (Appease(x, istvan) -> Lollop(x, wilfrid))\nforall x (Appease(x, cappella) -> Declaim(x, cappella))\n\nnot Declaim(wilfrid, cappella)\n\nforall x (Lollop(x, wilfrid) and Appease(x, wilfrid) -> Declaim(wilfrid, cappella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The elsie refund the arlo. The nannie is stricken. The arlo is oversewn. If someone retell the nannie and they eat the nannie then the nannie temporize the arlo. If the nannie is bearish then the nannie temporize the arlo. If the elsie retell the arlo and the elsie retell the nannie then the arlo temporize the elsie. If someone temporize the arlo then they visit the elsie. If someone refund the elsie then they visit the nannie. If someone refund the arlo then they like the arlo. The arlo retell the nannie.", "logic": "\nRefund(elsie, arlo)\nStricken(nannie)\nOversewn(arlo)\nforall x (Retell(x, nannie) and Refund(x, nannie) -> Temporize(nannie, arlo))\nBearish(nannie) -> Temporize(nannie, arlo)\nRetell(elsie, arlo) and Retell(elsie, nannie) -> Temporize(arlo, elsie)\nforall x (Temporize(x, arlo) -> Retell(x, elsie))\nforall x (Refund(x, elsie) -> Retell(x, nannie))\nforall x (Refund(x, arlo) -> Temporize(x, arlo))\n\nRetell(arlo, nannie)\n\nforall x (Refund(x, elsie) -> Retell(x, nannie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The tansy gambol the maggie. The dania is gooselike. The maggie is combative. If someone pave the dania and they eat the dania then the dania hurrah the maggie. If the dania is landed then the dania hurrah the maggie. If the tansy pave the maggie and the tansy pave the dania then the maggie hurrah the tansy. If someone hurrah the maggie then they visit the tansy. If someone gambol the tansy then they visit the dania. If someone gambol the maggie then they like the maggie. The maggie does not like the tansy.", "logic": "\nGambol(tansy, maggie)\nGooselike(dania)\nCombative(maggie)\nforall x (Pave(x, dania) and Gambol(x, dania) -> Hurrah(dania, maggie))\nLanded(dania) -> Hurrah(dania, maggie)\nPave(tansy, maggie) and Pave(tansy, dania) -> Hurrah(maggie, tansy)\nforall x (Hurrah(x, maggie) -> Pave(x, tansy))\nforall x (Gambol(x, tansy) -> Pave(x, dania))\nforall x (Gambol(x, maggie) -> Hurrah(x, maggie))\n\nnot Hurrah(maggie, tansy)\n\nPave(tansy, maggie) and Pave(tansy, dania) -> Hurrah(maggie, tansy) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The skippy live the tarzan. The karmen is unthinking. The tarzan is climatical. If someone french the karmen and they eat the karmen then the karmen verbalise the tarzan. If the karmen is loath then the karmen verbalise the tarzan. If the skippy french the tarzan and the skippy french the karmen then the tarzan verbalise the skippy. If someone verbalise the tarzan then they visit the skippy. If someone live the skippy then they visit the karmen. If someone live the tarzan then they like the tarzan. The tarzan is nice.", "logic": "\nLive(skippy, tarzan)\nUnthinking(karmen)\nClimatical(tarzan)\nforall x (French(x, karmen) and Live(x, karmen) -> Verbalise(karmen, tarzan))\nLoath(karmen) -> Verbalise(karmen, tarzan)\nFrench(skippy, tarzan) and French(skippy, karmen) -> Verbalise(tarzan, skippy)\nforall x (Verbalise(x, tarzan) -> French(x, skippy))\nforall x (Live(x, skippy) -> French(x, karmen))\nforall x (Live(x, tarzan) -> Verbalise(x, tarzan))\n\nNice(tarzan)\n\nNice(tarzan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The fredia enfeeble the marwin. The stinky is endowed. The marwin is ideal. If someone misaddress the stinky and they eat the stinky then the stinky embody the marwin. If the stinky is excitative then the stinky embody the marwin. If the fredia misaddress the marwin and the fredia misaddress the stinky then the marwin embody the fredia. If someone embody the marwin then they visit the fredia. If someone enfeeble the fredia then they visit the stinky. If someone enfeeble the marwin then they like the marwin. The fredia is not excitative.", "logic": "\nEnfeeble(fredia, marwin)\nEndowed(stinky)\nIdeal(marwin)\nforall x (Misaddress(x, stinky) and Enfeeble(x, stinky) -> Embody(stinky, marwin))\nExcitative(stinky) -> Embody(stinky, marwin)\nMisaddress(fredia, marwin) and Misaddress(fredia, stinky) -> Embody(marwin, fredia)\nforall x (Embody(x, marwin) -> Misaddress(x, fredia))\nforall x (Enfeeble(x, fredia) -> Misaddress(x, stinky))\nforall x (Enfeeble(x, marwin) -> Embody(x, marwin))\n\nnot Excitative(fredia)\n\nnot Excitative(fredia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "The zora winterize the kylie. The howard is pharisaic. The kylie is model. If someone demobilize the howard and they eat the howard then the howard bluster the kylie. If the howard is gratis then the howard bluster the kylie. If the zora demobilize the kylie and the zora demobilize the howard then the kylie bluster the zora. If someone bluster the kylie then they visit the zora. If someone winterize the zora then they visit the howard. If someone winterize the kylie then they like the kylie. The zora is cold.", "logic": "\nWinterize(zora, kylie)\nPharisaic(howard)\nModel(kylie)\nforall x (Demobilize(x, howard) and Winterize(x, howard) -> Bluster(howard, kylie))\nGratis(howard) -> Bluster(howard, kylie)\nDemobilize(zora, kylie) and Demobilize(zora, howard) -> Bluster(kylie, zora)\nforall x (Bluster(x, kylie) -> Demobilize(x, zora))\nforall x (Winterize(x, zora) -> Demobilize(x, howard))\nforall x (Winterize(x, kylie) -> Bluster(x, kylie))\n\nCold(zora)\n\nCold(zora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Troy is achievable. Troy is moire. Troy is northern. Troy is purulent. Troy is titled. Troy is not apiculate. Jeraldine is moire. Jeraldine is northern. Jeraldine is titled. Orlando is inexorable. Orlando is moire. Orlando is purulent. Orlando is apiculate. Ruthann is achievable. Ruthann is northern. Ruthann is titled. All moire people are purulent. If Orlando is purulent then Orlando is achievable. If someone is purulent and achievable then they are moire. If someone is purulent and not moire then they are apiculate. If someone is purulent and northern then they are not apiculate. If someone is moire and not apiculate then they are inexorable. Troy is not apiculate.", "logic": "\nAchievable(troy)\nMoire(troy)\nNorthern(troy)\nPurulent(troy)\nTitled(troy)\nnot Apiculate(troy)\nMoire(jeraldine)\nNorthern(jeraldine)\nTitled(jeraldine)\nInexorable(orlando)\nMoire(orlando)\nPurulent(orlando)\nApiculate(orlando)\nAchievable(ruthann)\nNorthern(ruthann)\nTitled(ruthann)\nforall x (Moire(x) -> Purulent(x))\nPurulent(orlando) -> Achievable(orlando)\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Achievable(x) -> Moire(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and not Moire(x) -> Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Northern(x) -> not Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) and not Apiculate(x) -> Inexorable(x))\n\nnot Apiculate(troy)\n\ntherefore not Apiculate(troy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Ethelda is nineteenth. Ethelda is restrained. Ethelda is earless. Ethelda is cadenced. Ethelda is corvine. Ethelda is not migrant. Camellia is restrained. Camellia is earless. Camellia is corvine. Ester is derivable. Ester is restrained. Ester is cadenced. Ester is migrant. Hamid is nineteenth. Hamid is earless. Hamid is corvine. All restrained people are cadenced. If Ester is cadenced then Ester is nineteenth. If someone is cadenced and nineteenth then they are restrained. If someone is cadenced and not restrained then they are migrant. If someone is cadenced and earless then they are not migrant. If someone is restrained and not migrant then they are derivable. Ester is not migrant.", "logic": "\nNineteenth(ethelda)\nRestrained(ethelda)\nEarless(ethelda)\nCadenced(ethelda)\nCorvine(ethelda)\nnot Migrant(ethelda)\nRestrained(camellia)\nEarless(camellia)\nCorvine(camellia)\nDerivable(ester)\nRestrained(ester)\nCadenced(ester)\nMigrant(ester)\nNineteenth(hamid)\nEarless(hamid)\nCorvine(hamid)\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Cadenced(x))\nCadenced(ester) -> Nineteenth(ester)\nforall x (Cadenced(x) and Nineteenth(x) -> Restrained(x))\nforall x (Cadenced(x) and not Restrained(x) -> Migrant(x))\nforall x (Cadenced(x) and Earless(x) -> not Migrant(x))\nforall x (Restrained(x) and not Migrant(x) -> Derivable(x))\n\nnot Migrant(ester)\n\ntherefore Migrant(ester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Kitti is arborary. Kitti is toilsome. Kitti is cetaceous. Kitti is betrothed. Kitti is blanched. Kitti is not divisible. Adelice is toilsome. Adelice is cetaceous. Adelice is blanched. Eleanore is singular. Eleanore is toilsome. Eleanore is betrothed. Eleanore is divisible. Wilbur is arborary. Wilbur is cetaceous. Wilbur is blanched. All toilsome people are betrothed. If Eleanore is betrothed then Eleanore is arborary. If someone is betrothed and arborary then they are toilsome. If someone is betrothed and not toilsome then they are divisible. If someone is betrothed and cetaceous then they are not divisible. If someone is toilsome and not divisible then they are singular. Adelice is betrothed.", "logic": "\nArborary(kitti)\nToilsome(kitti)\nCetaceous(kitti)\nBetrothed(kitti)\nBlanched(kitti)\nnot Divisible(kitti)\nToilsome(adelice)\nCetaceous(adelice)\nBlanched(adelice)\nSingular(eleanore)\nToilsome(eleanore)\nBetrothed(eleanore)\nDivisible(eleanore)\nArborary(wilbur)\nCetaceous(wilbur)\nBlanched(wilbur)\nforall x (Toilsome(x) -> Betrothed(x))\nBetrothed(eleanore) -> Arborary(eleanore)\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and Arborary(x) -> Toilsome(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and not Toilsome(x) -> Divisible(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and Cetaceous(x) -> not Divisible(x))\nforall x (Toilsome(x) and not Divisible(x) -> Singular(x))\n\nBetrothed(adelice)\n\nToilsome(adelice) and forall x (Toilsome(x) -> Betrothed(x)) -> therefore Betrothed(adelice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Leena is skilled. Leena is theban. Leena is phobic. Leena is ductless. Leena is sedgelike. Leena is not isosceles. Alexi is theban. Alexi is phobic. Alexi is sedgelike. Beau is secular. Beau is theban. Beau is ductless. Beau is isosceles. Deloria is skilled. Deloria is phobic. Deloria is sedgelike. All theban people are ductless. If Beau is ductless then Beau is skilled. If someone is ductless and skilled then they are theban. If someone is ductless and not theban then they are isosceles. If someone is ductless and phobic then they are not isosceles. If someone is theban and not isosceles then they are secular. Alexi is not ductless.", "logic": "\nSkilled(leena)\nTheban(leena)\nPhobic(leena)\nDuctless(leena)\nSedgelike(leena)\nnot Isosceles(leena)\nTheban(alexi)\nPhobic(alexi)\nSedgelike(alexi)\nSecular(beau)\nTheban(beau)\nDuctless(beau)\nIsosceles(beau)\nSkilled(deloria)\nPhobic(deloria)\nSedgelike(deloria)\nforall x (Theban(x) -> Ductless(x))\nDuctless(beau) -> Skilled(beau)\nforall x (Ductless(x) and Skilled(x) -> Theban(x))\nforall x (Ductless(x) and not Theban(x) -> Isosceles(x))\nforall x (Ductless(x) and Phobic(x) -> not Isosceles(x))\nforall x (Theban(x) and not Isosceles(x) -> Secular(x))\n\nnot Ductless(alexi)\n\nTheban(alexi) and forall x (Theban(x) -> Ductless(x)) -> therefore Ductless(alexi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Dorie is continued. Dorie is sexist. Dorie is underlying. Dorie is prone. Dorie is coquettish. Dorie is not sublimate. Mayer is sexist. Mayer is underlying. Mayer is coquettish. Mellicent is dyspnoeic. Mellicent is sexist. Mellicent is prone. Mellicent is sublimate. Gerti is continued. Gerti is underlying. Gerti is coquettish. All sexist people are prone. If Mellicent is prone then Mellicent is continued. If someone is prone and continued then they are sexist. If someone is prone and not sexist then they are sublimate. If someone is prone and underlying then they are not sublimate. If someone is sexist and not sublimate then they are dyspnoeic. Mayer is not sublimate.", "logic": "\nContinued(dorie)\nSexist(dorie)\nUnderlying(dorie)\nProne(dorie)\nCoquettish(dorie)\nnot Sublimate(dorie)\nSexist(mayer)\nUnderlying(mayer)\nCoquettish(mayer)\nDyspnoeic(mellicent)\nSexist(mellicent)\nProne(mellicent)\nSublimate(mellicent)\nContinued(gerti)\nUnderlying(gerti)\nCoquettish(gerti)\nforall x (Sexist(x) -> Prone(x))\nProne(mellicent) -> Continued(mellicent)\nforall x (Prone(x) and Continued(x) -> Sexist(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) and not Sexist(x) -> Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) and Underlying(x) -> not Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Sexist(x) and not Sublimate(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\n\nnot Sublimate(mayer)\n\nSexist(mayer) and forall x (Sexist(x) -> Prone(x)) -> therefore Prone(mayer) Prone(mayer) and Underlying(mayer) and forall x (Prone(x) and Underlying(x) -> not Sublimate(x)) -> therefore not Sublimate(mayer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Willis is deciduous. Willis is moody. Willis is almighty. Willis is inbuilt. Willis is orwellian. Willis is not amblyopic. Wendel is moody. Wendel is almighty. Wendel is orwellian. Fanchon is plodding. Fanchon is moody. Fanchon is inbuilt. Fanchon is amblyopic. Ingmar is deciduous. Ingmar is almighty. Ingmar is orwellian. All moody people are inbuilt. If Fanchon is inbuilt then Fanchon is deciduous. If someone is inbuilt and deciduous then they are moody. If someone is inbuilt and not moody then they are amblyopic. If someone is inbuilt and almighty then they are not amblyopic. If someone is moody and not amblyopic then they are plodding. Wendel is amblyopic.", "logic": "\nDeciduous(willis)\nMoody(willis)\nAlmighty(willis)\nInbuilt(willis)\nOrwellian(willis)\nnot Amblyopic(willis)\nMoody(wendel)\nAlmighty(wendel)\nOrwellian(wendel)\nPlodding(fanchon)\nMoody(fanchon)\nInbuilt(fanchon)\nAmblyopic(fanchon)\nDeciduous(ingmar)\nAlmighty(ingmar)\nOrwellian(ingmar)\nforall x (Moody(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\nInbuilt(fanchon) -> Deciduous(fanchon)\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) and Deciduous(x) -> Moody(x))\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) and not Moody(x) -> Amblyopic(x))\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) and Almighty(x) -> not Amblyopic(x))\nforall x (Moody(x) and not Amblyopic(x) -> Plodding(x))\n\nAmblyopic(wendel)\n\nMoody(wendel) and forall x (Moody(x) -> Inbuilt(x)) -> therefore Inbuilt(wendel) Inbuilt(wendel) and Almighty(wendel) and forall x (Inbuilt(x) and Almighty(x) -> not Amblyopic(x)) -> therefore not Amblyopic(wendel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Cheslie is kantian. Cheslie is protective. Cheslie is tittering. Cheslie is fabian. Cheslie is proper. Cheslie is not sightly. Ravi is protective. Ravi is tittering. Ravi is proper. Deonne is unvaned. Deonne is protective. Deonne is fabian. Deonne is sightly. Hymie is kantian. Hymie is tittering. Hymie is proper. All protective people are fabian. If Deonne is fabian then Deonne is kantian. If someone is fabian and kantian then they are protective. If someone is fabian and not protective then they are sightly. If someone is fabian and tittering then they are not sightly. If someone is protective and not sightly then they are unvaned. Hymie is not fabian.", "logic": "\nKantian(cheslie)\nProtective(cheslie)\nTittering(cheslie)\nFabian(cheslie)\nProper(cheslie)\nnot Sightly(cheslie)\nProtective(ravi)\nTittering(ravi)\nProper(ravi)\nUnvaned(deonne)\nProtective(deonne)\nFabian(deonne)\nSightly(deonne)\nKantian(hymie)\nTittering(hymie)\nProper(hymie)\nforall x (Protective(x) -> Fabian(x))\nFabian(deonne) -> Kantian(deonne)\nforall x (Fabian(x) and Kantian(x) -> Protective(x))\nforall x (Fabian(x) and not Protective(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Fabian(x) and Tittering(x) -> not Sightly(x))\nforall x (Protective(x) and not Sightly(x) -> Unvaned(x))\n\nnot Fabian(hymie)\n\nforall x (Protective(x) -> Fabian(x)) <- forall x (Fabian(x) and Kantian(x) -> Protective(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Inge is adulterine. Inge is respectful. Inge is overriding. Inge is tunisian. Inge is stationary. Inge is not amyloid. Stefanie is respectful. Stefanie is overriding. Stefanie is stationary. Luella is impolitic. Luella is respectful. Luella is tunisian. Luella is amyloid. Graeme is adulterine. Graeme is overriding. Graeme is stationary. All respectful people are tunisian. If Luella is tunisian then Luella is adulterine. If someone is tunisian and adulterine then they are respectful. If someone is tunisian and not respectful then they are amyloid. If someone is tunisian and overriding then they are not amyloid. If someone is respectful and not amyloid then they are impolitic. Graeme is impolitic.", "logic": "\nAdulterine(inge)\nRespectful(inge)\nOverriding(inge)\nTunisian(inge)\nStationary(inge)\nnot Amyloid(inge)\nRespectful(stefanie)\nOverriding(stefanie)\nStationary(stefanie)\nImpolitic(luella)\nRespectful(luella)\nTunisian(luella)\nAmyloid(luella)\nAdulterine(graeme)\nOverriding(graeme)\nStationary(graeme)\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> Tunisian(x))\nTunisian(luella) -> Adulterine(luella)\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and Adulterine(x) -> Respectful(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and not Respectful(x) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and Overriding(x) -> not Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Respectful(x) and not Amyloid(x) -> Impolitic(x))\n\nImpolitic(graeme)\n\nforall x (Respectful(x) and not Amyloid(x) -> Impolitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Eustacia is unpompous. Eustacia is unawakened. Eustacia is randy. Eustacia is trashy. Eustacia is handless. Eustacia is not gilbertian. Letti is unawakened. Letti is randy. Letti is handless. Bryon is hunted. Bryon is unawakened. Bryon is trashy. Bryon is gilbertian. Gabbey is unpompous. Gabbey is randy. Gabbey is handless. All unawakened people are trashy. If Bryon is trashy then Bryon is unpompous. If someone is trashy and unpompous then they are unawakened. If someone is trashy and not unawakened then they are gilbertian. If someone is trashy and randy then they are not gilbertian. If someone is unawakened and not gilbertian then they are hunted. Gabbey is not gilbertian.", "logic": "\nUnpompous(eustacia)\nUnawakened(eustacia)\nRandy(eustacia)\nTrashy(eustacia)\nHandless(eustacia)\nnot Gilbertian(eustacia)\nUnawakened(letti)\nRandy(letti)\nHandless(letti)\nHunted(bryon)\nUnawakened(bryon)\nTrashy(bryon)\nGilbertian(bryon)\nUnpompous(gabbey)\nRandy(gabbey)\nHandless(gabbey)\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Trashy(x))\nTrashy(bryon) -> Unpompous(bryon)\nforall x (Trashy(x) and Unpompous(x) -> Unawakened(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) and not Unawakened(x) -> Gilbertian(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) and Randy(x) -> not Gilbertian(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and not Gilbertian(x) -> Hunted(x))\n\nnot Gilbertian(gabbey)\n\nforall x (Trashy(x) and not Unawakened(x) -> Gilbertian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Theobald is debased. Theobald is phrenetic. Theobald is unmoving. Theobald is geographic. Theobald is tobagonian. Theobald is not aleatory. Marilee is phrenetic. Marilee is unmoving. Marilee is tobagonian. Jamey is unartistic. Jamey is phrenetic. Jamey is geographic. Jamey is aleatory. Dusty is debased. Dusty is unmoving. Dusty is tobagonian. All phrenetic people are geographic. If Jamey is geographic then Jamey is debased. If someone is geographic and debased then they are phrenetic. If someone is geographic and not phrenetic then they are aleatory. If someone is geographic and unmoving then they are not aleatory. If someone is phrenetic and not aleatory then they are unartistic. Marilee is debased.", "logic": "\nDebased(theobald)\nPhrenetic(theobald)\nUnmoving(theobald)\nGeographic(theobald)\nTobagonian(theobald)\nnot Aleatory(theobald)\nPhrenetic(marilee)\nUnmoving(marilee)\nTobagonian(marilee)\nUnartistic(jamey)\nPhrenetic(jamey)\nGeographic(jamey)\nAleatory(jamey)\nDebased(dusty)\nUnmoving(dusty)\nTobagonian(dusty)\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) -> Geographic(x))\nGeographic(jamey) -> Debased(jamey)\nforall x (Geographic(x) and Debased(x) -> Phrenetic(x))\nforall x (Geographic(x) and not Phrenetic(x) -> Aleatory(x))\nforall x (Geographic(x) and Unmoving(x) -> not Aleatory(x))\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) and not Aleatory(x) -> Unartistic(x))\n\nDebased(marilee)\n\nDebased(marilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Justine is homiletic. Justine is depilatory. Justine is sopranino. Justine is polemic. Justine is amoeban. Justine is not indebted. Shanon is depilatory. Shanon is sopranino. Shanon is amoeban. Berni is coalescent. Berni is depilatory. Berni is polemic. Berni is indebted. Basil is homiletic. Basil is sopranino. Basil is amoeban. All depilatory people are polemic. If Berni is polemic then Berni is homiletic. If someone is polemic and homiletic then they are depilatory. If someone is polemic and not depilatory then they are indebted. If someone is polemic and sopranino then they are not indebted. If someone is depilatory and not indebted then they are coalescent. Berni is not amoeban.", "logic": "\nHomiletic(justine)\nDepilatory(justine)\nSopranino(justine)\nPolemic(justine)\nAmoeban(justine)\nnot Indebted(justine)\nDepilatory(shanon)\nSopranino(shanon)\nAmoeban(shanon)\nCoalescent(berni)\nDepilatory(berni)\nPolemic(berni)\nIndebted(berni)\nHomiletic(basil)\nSopranino(basil)\nAmoeban(basil)\nforall x (Depilatory(x) -> Polemic(x))\nPolemic(berni) -> Homiletic(berni)\nforall x (Polemic(x) and Homiletic(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nforall x (Polemic(x) and not Depilatory(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Polemic(x) and Sopranino(x) -> not Indebted(x))\nforall x (Depilatory(x) and not Indebted(x) -> Coalescent(x))\n\nnot Amoeban(berni)\n\nnot Amoeban(berni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Ambrose is drunken. Ambrose is underdone. Ambrose is pragmatic. Ambrose is cosmogenic. Ambrose is faux. Ambrose is not fueled. Talbot is underdone. Talbot is pragmatic. Talbot is faux. Maiga is reflexed. Maiga is underdone. Maiga is cosmogenic. Maiga is fueled. Sebastian is drunken. Sebastian is pragmatic. Sebastian is faux. All underdone people are cosmogenic. If Maiga is cosmogenic then Maiga is drunken. If someone is cosmogenic and drunken then they are underdone. If someone is cosmogenic and not underdone then they are fueled. If someone is cosmogenic and pragmatic then they are not fueled. If someone is underdone and not fueled then they are reflexed. Maiga is pragmatic.", "logic": "\nDrunken(ambrose)\nUnderdone(ambrose)\nPragmatic(ambrose)\nCosmogenic(ambrose)\nFaux(ambrose)\nnot Fueled(ambrose)\nUnderdone(talbot)\nPragmatic(talbot)\nFaux(talbot)\nReflexed(maiga)\nUnderdone(maiga)\nCosmogenic(maiga)\nFueled(maiga)\nDrunken(sebastian)\nPragmatic(sebastian)\nFaux(sebastian)\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> Cosmogenic(x))\nCosmogenic(maiga) -> Drunken(maiga)\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and Drunken(x) -> Underdone(x))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and not Underdone(x) -> Fueled(x))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and Pragmatic(x) -> not Fueled(x))\nforall x (Underdone(x) and not Fueled(x) -> Reflexed(x))\n\nPragmatic(maiga)\n\nPragmatic(maiga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Alec is privileged. Winifred is despiteful. All fuzzed, xviii things are privileged. Green, privileged things are colloquial. Furry, tragicomic things are privileged. All sulky things are despiteful. If something is fuzzed and sulky then it is despiteful. Kind things are sulky. If something is sulky and tragicomic then it is privileged. All privileged things are xviii. Winifred is despiteful.", "logic": "\nPrivileged(alec)\nDespiteful(winifred)\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Xviii(x) -> Privileged(x))\nforall x (Despiteful(x) and Privileged(x) -> Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) and Tragicomic(x) -> Privileged(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Despiteful(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Sulky(x) -> Despiteful(x))\nforall x (Xviii(x) -> Sulky(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) and Tragicomic(x) -> Privileged(x))\nforall x (Privileged(x) -> Xviii(x))\n\nDespiteful(winifred)\n\ntherefore Despiteful(winifred)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Cybelle is expedient. Mac is mouselike. All behind, unseasoned things are expedient. Green, expedient things are wrong. Furry, windburned things are expedient. All hadean things are mouselike. If something is behind and hadean then it is mouselike. Kind things are hadean. If something is hadean and windburned then it is expedient. All expedient things are unseasoned. Mac is not mouselike.", "logic": "\nExpedient(cybelle)\nMouselike(mac)\nforall x (Behind(x) and Unseasoned(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) and Expedient(x) -> Wrong(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) and Windburned(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) and Hadean(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) -> Hadean(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) and Windburned(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) -> Unseasoned(x))\n\nnot Mouselike(mac)\n\ntherefore Mouselike(mac)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Nickie is nifty. Cleo is toothy. All overstated, jewelled things are nifty. Green, nifty things are adjuratory. Furry, starchless things are nifty. All defiled things are toothy. If something is overstated and defiled then it is toothy. Kind things are defiled. If something is defiled and starchless then it is nifty. All nifty things are jewelled. Nickie is jewelled.", "logic": "\nNifty(nickie)\nToothy(cleo)\nforall x (Overstated(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Nifty(x))\nforall x (Toothy(x) and Nifty(x) -> Adjuratory(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Starchless(x) -> Nifty(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) -> Toothy(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) and Defiled(x) -> Toothy(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Starchless(x) -> Nifty(x))\nforall x (Nifty(x) -> Jewelled(x))\n\nJewelled(nickie)\n\nNifty(nickie) and forall x (Nifty(x) -> Jewelled(x)) -> therefore Jewelled(nickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Katee is vestal. Pollyanna is erudite. All stumpy, meticulous things are vestal. Green, vestal things are scornful. Furry, bismuthal things are vestal. All cluttered things are erudite. If something is stumpy and cluttered then it is erudite. Kind things are cluttered. If something is cluttered and bismuthal then it is vestal. All vestal things are meticulous. Katee is not meticulous.", "logic": "\nVestal(katee)\nErudite(pollyanna)\nforall x (Stumpy(x) and Meticulous(x) -> Vestal(x))\nforall x (Erudite(x) and Vestal(x) -> Scornful(x))\nforall x (Cluttered(x) and Bismuthal(x) -> Vestal(x))\nforall x (Cluttered(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Stumpy(x) and Cluttered(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Meticulous(x) -> Cluttered(x))\nforall x (Cluttered(x) and Bismuthal(x) -> Vestal(x))\nforall x (Vestal(x) -> Meticulous(x))\n\nnot Meticulous(katee)\n\nVestal(katee) and forall x (Vestal(x) -> Meticulous(x)) -> therefore Meticulous(katee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Lenard is biaxate. Christi is chitinous. All protean, unsmooth things are biaxate. Green, biaxate things are limbed. Furry, unlocated things are biaxate. All restricted things are chitinous. If something is protean and restricted then it is chitinous. Kind things are restricted. If something is restricted and unlocated then it is biaxate. All biaxate things are unsmooth. Lenard is restricted.", "logic": "\nBiaxate(lenard)\nChitinous(christi)\nforall x (Protean(x) and Unsmooth(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) and Biaxate(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) and Unlocated(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Chitinous(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) and Restricted(x) -> Chitinous(x))\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Restricted(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) and Unlocated(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> Unsmooth(x))\n\nRestricted(lenard)\n\nBiaxate(lenard) and forall x (Biaxate(x) -> Unsmooth(x)) -> therefore Unsmooth(lenard) Unsmooth(lenard) and forall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Restricted(x)) -> therefore Restricted(lenard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Beatrice is faithless. Emmalyn is bottomless. All adroit, civic things are faithless. Green, faithless things are faucal. Furry, trillionth things are faithless. All papillate things are bottomless. If something is adroit and papillate then it is bottomless. Kind things are papillate. If something is papillate and trillionth then it is faithless. All faithless things are civic. Beatrice is not papillate.", "logic": "\nFaithless(beatrice)\nBottomless(emmalyn)\nforall x (Adroit(x) and Civic(x) -> Faithless(x))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) and Faithless(x) -> Faucal(x))\nforall x (Papillate(x) and Trillionth(x) -> Faithless(x))\nforall x (Papillate(x) -> Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Adroit(x) and Papillate(x) -> Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Civic(x) -> Papillate(x))\nforall x (Papillate(x) and Trillionth(x) -> Faithless(x))\nforall x (Faithless(x) -> Civic(x))\n\nnot Papillate(beatrice)\n\nFaithless(beatrice) and forall x (Faithless(x) -> Civic(x)) -> therefore Civic(beatrice) Civic(beatrice) and forall x (Civic(x) -> Papillate(x)) -> therefore Papillate(beatrice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Odille is individual. Brenn is undreamt. All downward, autarkical things are individual. Green, individual things are wizen. Furry, taboo things are individual. All arching things are undreamt. If something is downward and arching then it is undreamt. Kind things are arching. If something is arching and taboo then it is individual. All individual things are autarkical. Brenn is not autarkical.", "logic": "\nIndividual(odille)\nUndreamt(brenn)\nforall x (Downward(x) and Autarkical(x) -> Individual(x))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) and Individual(x) -> Wizen(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) and Taboo(x) -> Individual(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Undreamt(x))\nforall x (Downward(x) and Arching(x) -> Undreamt(x))\nforall x (Autarkical(x) -> Arching(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) and Taboo(x) -> Individual(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) -> Autarkical(x))\n\nnot Autarkical(brenn)\n\nforall x (Individual(x) -> Autarkical(x)) <- forall x (Downward(x) and Autarkical(x) -> Individual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Aubrette is processed. Sofie is unimproved. All sacrosanct, unprovable things are processed. Green, processed things are supported. Furry, downfield things are processed. All diatonic things are unimproved. If something is sacrosanct and diatonic then it is unimproved. Kind things are diatonic. If something is diatonic and downfield then it is processed. All processed things are unprovable. Sofie is diatonic.", "logic": "\nProcessed(aubrette)\nUnimproved(sofie)\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Unprovable(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Unimproved(x) and Processed(x) -> Supported(x))\nforall x (Diatonic(x) and Downfield(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Diatonic(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Diatonic(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Unprovable(x) -> Diatonic(x))\nforall x (Diatonic(x) and Downfield(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) -> Unprovable(x))\n\nDiatonic(sofie)\n\nforall x (Unprovable(x) -> Diatonic(x)) <- forall x (Processed(x) -> Unprovable(x)) <- forall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Unprovable(x) -> Processed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Florence is persisting. Ardis is absorbent. All actuated, infinite things are persisting. Green, persisting things are bacchantic. Furry, inborn things are persisting. All south things are absorbent. If something is actuated and south then it is absorbent. Kind things are south. If something is south and inborn then it is persisting. All persisting things are infinite. Ardis is not bacchantic.", "logic": "\nPersisting(florence)\nAbsorbent(ardis)\nforall x (Actuated(x) and Infinite(x) -> Persisting(x))\nforall x (Absorbent(x) and Persisting(x) -> Bacchantic(x))\nforall x (South(x) and Inborn(x) -> Persisting(x))\nforall x (South(x) -> Absorbent(x))\nforall x (Actuated(x) and South(x) -> Absorbent(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (South(x) and Inborn(x) -> Persisting(x))\nforall x (Persisting(x) -> Infinite(x))\n\nnot Bacchantic(ardis)\n\nforall x (Absorbent(x) and Persisting(x) -> Bacchantic(x)) <- forall x (Actuated(x) and Infinite(x) -> Persisting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Evelyn is aboveboard. Marjy is bifoliate. All deciding, heavy things are aboveboard. Green, aboveboard things are reachable. Furry, keen things are aboveboard. All guilty things are bifoliate. If something is deciding and guilty then it is bifoliate. Kind things are guilty. If something is guilty and keen then it is aboveboard. All aboveboard things are heavy. Marjy is keen.", "logic": "\nAboveboard(evelyn)\nBifoliate(marjy)\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Heavy(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) and Aboveboard(x) -> Reachable(x))\nforall x (Guilty(x) and Keen(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Guilty(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Guilty(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Heavy(x) -> Guilty(x))\nforall x (Guilty(x) and Keen(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Heavy(x))\n\nKeen(marjy)\n\nKeen(marjy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Kingston is canopied. Delphine is urogenital. All dejected, amoebous things are canopied. Green, canopied things are anaerobic. Furry, unwashed things are canopied. All swift things are urogenital. If something is dejected and swift then it is urogenital. Kind things are swift. If something is swift and unwashed then it is canopied. All canopied things are amoebous. Kingston is not dejected.", "logic": "\nCanopied(kingston)\nUrogenital(delphine)\nforall x (Dejected(x) and Amoebous(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) and Canopied(x) -> Anaerobic(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) and Unwashed(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) -> Urogenital(x))\nforall x (Dejected(x) and Swift(x) -> Urogenital(x))\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) and Unwashed(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> Amoebous(x))\n\nnot Dejected(kingston)\n\nnot Dejected(kingston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "Lonee is panoptic. Roth is unknown. All heatless, familiar things are panoptic. Green, panoptic things are soulless. Furry, invidious things are panoptic. All sweltering things are unknown. If something is heatless and sweltering then it is unknown. Kind things are sweltering. If something is sweltering and invidious then it is panoptic. All panoptic things are familiar. Roth is heatless.", "logic": "\nPanoptic(lonee)\nUnknown(roth)\nforall x (Heatless(x) and Familiar(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Unknown(x) and Panoptic(x) -> Soulless(x))\nforall x (Sweltering(x) and Invidious(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Sweltering(x) -> Unknown(x))\nforall x (Heatless(x) and Sweltering(x) -> Unknown(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Sweltering(x))\nforall x (Sweltering(x) and Invidious(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Familiar(x))\n\nHeatless(roth)\n\nHeatless(roth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1576"} {"premises": "The sapphire is unpromised. The sapphire is quarterly. The sapphire is patented. If someone is quarterly then they are unbecoming. All rhombic, patented people are not unbecoming. If the sapphire is unbecoming then the sapphire is not rhombic. Nice people are patented. If the sapphire is rhombic then the sapphire is unbecoming. If someone is quarterly and not patented then they are unpromised. The sapphire is unpromised.", "logic": "\nUnpromised(sapphire)\nQuarterly(sapphire)\nPatented(sapphire)\nforall x (Quarterly(x) -> Unbecoming(x))\nforall x (Rhombic(x) and Patented(x) -> not Unbecoming(x))\nUnbecoming(sapphire) -> not Rhombic(sapphire)\nforall x (Quarterly(x) -> Patented(x))\nRhombic(sapphire) -> Unbecoming(sapphire)\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and not Patented(x) -> Unpromised(x))\n\nUnpromised(sapphire)\n\ntherefore Unpromised(sapphire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The fleur is varied. The fleur is bowed. The fleur is whimsical. If someone is bowed then they are etiologic. All arthurian, whimsical people are not etiologic. If the fleur is etiologic then the fleur is not arthurian. Nice people are whimsical. If the fleur is arthurian then the fleur is etiologic. If someone is bowed and not whimsical then they are varied. The fleur is not whimsical.", "logic": "\nVaried(fleur)\nBowed(fleur)\nWhimsical(fleur)\nforall x (Bowed(x) -> Etiologic(x))\nforall x (Arthurian(x) and Whimsical(x) -> not Etiologic(x))\nEtiologic(fleur) -> not Arthurian(fleur)\nforall x (Bowed(x) -> Whimsical(x))\nArthurian(fleur) -> Etiologic(fleur)\nforall x (Bowed(x) and not Whimsical(x) -> Varied(x))\n\nnot Whimsical(fleur)\n\ntherefore Whimsical(fleur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The elyse is patriotic. The elyse is four. The elyse is stunning. If someone is four then they are cuttable. All guided, stunning people are not cuttable. If the elyse is cuttable then the elyse is not guided. Nice people are stunning. If the elyse is guided then the elyse is cuttable. If someone is four and not stunning then they are patriotic. The elyse is cuttable.", "logic": "\nPatriotic(elyse)\nFour(elyse)\nStunning(elyse)\nforall x (Four(x) -> Cuttable(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) and Stunning(x) -> not Cuttable(x))\nCuttable(elyse) -> not Guided(elyse)\nforall x (Four(x) -> Stunning(x))\nGuided(elyse) -> Cuttable(elyse)\nforall x (Four(x) and not Stunning(x) -> Patriotic(x))\n\nCuttable(elyse)\n\nFour(elyse) and forall x (Four(x) -> Cuttable(x)) -> therefore Cuttable(elyse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The alexandra is errorless. The alexandra is hideous. The alexandra is scrivened. If someone is hideous then they are aphoristic. All squinched, scrivened people are not aphoristic. If the alexandra is aphoristic then the alexandra is not squinched. Nice people are scrivened. If the alexandra is squinched then the alexandra is aphoristic. If someone is hideous and not scrivened then they are errorless. The alexandra is not aphoristic.", "logic": "\nErrorless(alexandra)\nHideous(alexandra)\nScrivened(alexandra)\nforall x (Hideous(x) -> Aphoristic(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) and Scrivened(x) -> not Aphoristic(x))\nAphoristic(alexandra) -> not Squinched(alexandra)\nforall x (Hideous(x) -> Scrivened(x))\nSquinched(alexandra) -> Aphoristic(alexandra)\nforall x (Hideous(x) and not Scrivened(x) -> Errorless(x))\n\nnot Aphoristic(alexandra)\n\nHideous(alexandra) and forall x (Hideous(x) -> Aphoristic(x)) -> therefore Aphoristic(alexandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The klaus is agamous. The klaus is abominable. The klaus is slangy. If someone is abominable then they are tonsured. All spanking, slangy people are not tonsured. If the klaus is tonsured then the klaus is not spanking. Nice people are slangy. If the klaus is spanking then the klaus is tonsured. If someone is abominable and not slangy then they are agamous. The klaus is not spanking.", "logic": "\nAgamous(klaus)\nAbominable(klaus)\nSlangy(klaus)\nforall x (Abominable(x) -> Tonsured(x))\nforall x (Spanking(x) and Slangy(x) -> not Tonsured(x))\nTonsured(klaus) -> not Spanking(klaus)\nforall x (Abominable(x) -> Slangy(x))\nSpanking(klaus) -> Tonsured(klaus)\nforall x (Abominable(x) and not Slangy(x) -> Agamous(x))\n\nnot Spanking(klaus)\n\nAbominable(klaus) and forall x (Abominable(x) -> Tonsured(x)) -> therefore Tonsured(klaus) Tonsured(klaus) and Tonsured(klaus) -> not Spanking(klaus) -> therefore not Spanking(klaus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The billy is reusable. The billy is bionomic. The billy is brazen. If someone is bionomic then they are scorched. All arrayed, brazen people are not scorched. If the billy is scorched then the billy is not arrayed. Nice people are brazen. If the billy is arrayed then the billy is scorched. If someone is bionomic and not brazen then they are reusable. The billy is arrayed.", "logic": "\nReusable(billy)\nBionomic(billy)\nBrazen(billy)\nforall x (Bionomic(x) -> Scorched(x))\nforall x (Arrayed(x) and Brazen(x) -> not Scorched(x))\nScorched(billy) -> not Arrayed(billy)\nforall x (Bionomic(x) -> Brazen(x))\nArrayed(billy) -> Scorched(billy)\nforall x (Bionomic(x) and not Brazen(x) -> Reusable(x))\n\nArrayed(billy)\n\nBionomic(billy) and forall x (Bionomic(x) -> Scorched(x)) -> therefore Scorched(billy) Scorched(billy) and Scorched(billy) -> not Arrayed(billy) -> therefore not Arrayed(billy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The judah is sinful. The judah is melodious. The judah is attic. If someone is melodious then they are barbadian. All tricksy, attic people are not barbadian. If the judah is barbadian then the judah is not tricksy. Nice people are attic. If the judah is tricksy then the judah is barbadian. If someone is melodious and not attic then they are sinful. The judah does not like the judah.", "logic": "\nSinful(judah)\nMelodious(judah)\nAttic(judah)\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Barbadian(x))\nforall x (Tricksy(x) and Attic(x) -> not Barbadian(x))\nBarbadian(judah) -> not Tricksy(judah)\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Attic(x))\nTricksy(judah) -> Barbadian(judah)\nforall x (Melodious(x) and not Attic(x) -> Sinful(x))\n\nnot Likes(judah, judah)\n\nnot Likes(judah, judah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The trixy is duple. The trixy is welsh. The trixy is overage. If someone is welsh then they are howling. All alexic, overage people are not howling. If the trixy is howling then the trixy is not alexic. Nice people are overage. If the trixy is alexic then the trixy is howling. If someone is welsh and not overage then they are duple. The trixy sees the trixy.", "logic": "\nDuple(trixy)\nWelsh(trixy)\nOverage(trixy)\nforall x (Welsh(x) -> Howling(x))\nforall x (Alexic(x) and Overage(x) -> not Howling(x))\nHowling(trixy) -> not Alexic(trixy)\nforall x (Welsh(x) -> Overage(x))\nAlexic(trixy) -> Howling(trixy)\nforall x (Welsh(x) and not Overage(x) -> Duple(x))\n\nSees(trixy, trixy)\n\nSees(trixy, trixy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-901"} {"premises": "The korney rack the nisa. The korney is antlered. The korney is herbaceous. The korney is blunted. The korney is rimeless. The korney is statewide. The korney stint the nisa. The korney arrogate the nisa. The nisa rack the korney. The nisa is antlered. The nisa is herbaceous. The nisa is blunted. The nisa is rimeless. The nisa is statewide. The nisa stint the korney. The nisa arrogate the korney. If something is herbaceous then it rack the nisa. If something is statewide and it rack the nisa then it arrogate the nisa. The nisa is antlered.", "logic": "\nRack(korney, nisa)\nAntlered(korney)\nHerbaceous(korney)\nBlunted(korney)\nRimeless(korney)\nStatewide(korney)\nStint(korney, nisa)\nArrogate(korney, nisa)\nRack(nisa, korney)\nAntlered(nisa)\nHerbaceous(nisa)\nBlunted(nisa)\nRimeless(nisa)\nStatewide(nisa)\nStint(nisa, korney)\nArrogate(nisa, korney)\nforall x (Herbaceous(x) -> Rack(x, nisa))\nforall x (Statewide(x) and Rack(x, nisa) -> Arrogate(x, nisa))\n\nAntlered(nisa)\n\ntherefore Antlered(nisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The evita thresh the terza. The evita is prostrate. The evita is pastelike. The evita is prepupal. The evita is obstetric. The evita is whiskery. The evita wish the terza. The evita pile the terza. The terza thresh the evita. The terza is prostrate. The terza is pastelike. The terza is prepupal. The terza is obstetric. The terza is whiskery. The terza wish the evita. The terza pile the evita. If something is pastelike then it thresh the terza. If something is whiskery and it thresh the terza then it pile the terza. The evita does not like the terza.", "logic": "\nThresh(evita, terza)\nProstrate(evita)\nPastelike(evita)\nPrepupal(evita)\nObstetric(evita)\nWhiskery(evita)\nWish(evita, terza)\nPile(evita, terza)\nThresh(terza, evita)\nProstrate(terza)\nPastelike(terza)\nPrepupal(terza)\nObstetric(terza)\nWhiskery(terza)\nWish(terza, evita)\nPile(terza, evita)\nforall x (Pastelike(x) -> Thresh(x, terza))\nforall x (Whiskery(x) and Thresh(x, terza) -> Pile(x, terza))\n\nnot Wish(evita, terza)\n\ntherefore Wish(evita, terza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The skell canton the darrin. The skell is steely. The skell is aground. The skell is mammalian. The skell is isocyclic. The skell is indwelling. The skell finish the darrin. The skell militarise the darrin. The darrin canton the skell. The darrin is steely. The darrin is aground. The darrin is mammalian. The darrin is isocyclic. The darrin is indwelling. The darrin finish the skell. The darrin militarise the skell. If something is aground then it canton the darrin. If something is indwelling and it canton the darrin then it militarise the darrin. The darrin canton the darrin.", "logic": "\nCanton(skell, darrin)\nSteely(skell)\nAground(skell)\nMammalian(skell)\nIsocyclic(skell)\nIndwelling(skell)\nFinish(skell, darrin)\nMilitarise(skell, darrin)\nCanton(darrin, skell)\nSteely(darrin)\nAground(darrin)\nMammalian(darrin)\nIsocyclic(darrin)\nIndwelling(darrin)\nFinish(darrin, skell)\nMilitarise(darrin, skell)\nforall x (Aground(x) -> Canton(x, darrin))\nforall x (Indwelling(x) and Canton(x, darrin) -> Militarise(x, darrin))\n\nCanton(darrin, darrin)\n\nAground(darrin) and forall x (Aground(x) -> Canton(x, darrin)) -> therefore Canton(darrin, darrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The dulcie submerge the dara. The dulcie is explicable. The dulcie is cultivated. The dulcie is righteous. The dulcie is commensal. The dulcie is wearying. The dulcie ballyhoo the dara. The dulcie formalize the dara. The dara submerge the dulcie. The dara is explicable. The dara is cultivated. The dara is righteous. The dara is commensal. The dara is wearying. The dara ballyhoo the dulcie. The dara formalize the dulcie. If something is cultivated then it submerge the dara. If something is wearying and it submerge the dara then it formalize the dara. The dara does not chase the dara.", "logic": "\nSubmerge(dulcie, dara)\nExplicable(dulcie)\nCultivated(dulcie)\nRighteous(dulcie)\nCommensal(dulcie)\nWearying(dulcie)\nBallyhoo(dulcie, dara)\nFormalize(dulcie, dara)\nSubmerge(dara, dulcie)\nExplicable(dara)\nCultivated(dara)\nRighteous(dara)\nCommensal(dara)\nWearying(dara)\nBallyhoo(dara, dulcie)\nFormalize(dara, dulcie)\nforall x (Cultivated(x) -> Submerge(x, dara))\nforall x (Wearying(x) and Submerge(x, dara) -> Formalize(x, dara))\n\nnot Submerge(dara, dara)\n\nCultivated(dara) and forall x (Cultivated(x) -> Submerge(x, dara)) -> therefore Submerge(dara, dara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The amata ossify the aldo. The amata is seven. The amata is remorseful. The amata is second. The amata is dried. The amata is copacetic. The amata mumble the aldo. The amata reign the aldo. The aldo ossify the amata. The aldo is seven. The aldo is remorseful. The aldo is second. The aldo is dried. The aldo is copacetic. The aldo mumble the amata. The aldo reign the amata. If something is remorseful then it ossify the aldo. If something is copacetic and it ossify the aldo then it reign the aldo. The aldo reign the aldo.", "logic": "\nOssify(amata, aldo)\nSeven(amata)\nRemorseful(amata)\nSecond(amata)\nDried(amata)\nCopacetic(amata)\nMumble(amata, aldo)\nReign(amata, aldo)\nOssify(aldo, amata)\nSeven(aldo)\nRemorseful(aldo)\nSecond(aldo)\nDried(aldo)\nCopacetic(aldo)\nMumble(aldo, amata)\nReign(aldo, amata)\nforall x (Remorseful(x) -> Ossify(x, aldo))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) and Ossify(x, aldo) -> Reign(x, aldo))\n\nReign(aldo, aldo)\n\nRemorseful(aldo) and forall x (Remorseful(x) -> Ossify(x, aldo)) -> therefore Ossify(aldo, aldo) Copacetic(aldo) and Ossify(aldo, aldo) and forall x (Copacetic(x) and Ossify(x, aldo) -> Reign(x, aldo)) -> therefore Reign(aldo, aldo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The mark scare the roderigo. The mark is adaptive. The mark is orgiastic. The mark is piquant. The mark is gooselike. The mark is salving. The mark handcraft the roderigo. The mark bachelor the roderigo. The roderigo scare the mark. The roderigo is adaptive. The roderigo is orgiastic. The roderigo is piquant. The roderigo is gooselike. The roderigo is salving. The roderigo handcraft the mark. The roderigo bachelor the mark. If something is orgiastic then it scare the roderigo. If something is salving and it scare the roderigo then it bachelor the roderigo. The roderigo does not see the roderigo.", "logic": "\nScare(mark, roderigo)\nAdaptive(mark)\nOrgiastic(mark)\nPiquant(mark)\nGooselike(mark)\nSalving(mark)\nHandcraft(mark, roderigo)\nBachelor(mark, roderigo)\nScare(roderigo, mark)\nAdaptive(roderigo)\nOrgiastic(roderigo)\nPiquant(roderigo)\nGooselike(roderigo)\nSalving(roderigo)\nHandcraft(roderigo, mark)\nBachelor(roderigo, mark)\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Scare(x, roderigo))\nforall x (Salving(x) and Scare(x, roderigo) -> Bachelor(x, roderigo))\n\nnot Bachelor(roderigo, roderigo)\n\nOrgiastic(roderigo) and forall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Scare(x, roderigo)) -> therefore Scare(roderigo, roderigo) Salving(roderigo) and Scare(roderigo, roderigo) and forall x (Salving(x) and Scare(x, roderigo) -> Bachelor(x, roderigo)) -> therefore Bachelor(roderigo, roderigo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The reinhard sail the simona. The reinhard is appetitive. The reinhard is prostatic. The reinhard is ripened. The reinhard is wandering. The reinhard is bullish. The reinhard squeal the simona. The reinhard summon the simona. The simona sail the reinhard. The simona is appetitive. The simona is prostatic. The simona is ripened. The simona is wandering. The simona is bullish. The simona squeal the reinhard. The simona summon the reinhard. If something is prostatic then it sail the simona. If something is bullish and it sail the simona then it summon the simona. The reinhard does not chase the reinhard.", "logic": "\nSail(reinhard, simona)\nAppetitive(reinhard)\nProstatic(reinhard)\nRipened(reinhard)\nWandering(reinhard)\nBullish(reinhard)\nSqueal(reinhard, simona)\nSummon(reinhard, simona)\nSail(simona, reinhard)\nAppetitive(simona)\nProstatic(simona)\nRipened(simona)\nWandering(simona)\nBullish(simona)\nSqueal(simona, reinhard)\nSummon(simona, reinhard)\nforall x (Prostatic(x) -> Sail(x, simona))\nforall x (Bullish(x) and Sail(x, simona) -> Summon(x, simona))\n\nnot Sail(reinhard, reinhard)\n\nnot Sail(reinhard, reinhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The allen sled the daisi. The allen is ebony. The allen is effete. The allen is sulcate. The allen is hexangular. The allen is generative. The allen misapply the daisi. The allen intumesce the daisi. The daisi sled the allen. The daisi is ebony. The daisi is effete. The daisi is sulcate. The daisi is hexangular. The daisi is generative. The daisi misapply the allen. The daisi intumesce the allen. If something is effete then it sled the daisi. If something is generative and it sled the daisi then it intumesce the daisi. The allen intumesce the allen.", "logic": "\nSled(allen, daisi)\nEbony(allen)\nEffete(allen)\nSulcate(allen)\nHexangular(allen)\nGenerative(allen)\nMisapply(allen, daisi)\nIntumesce(allen, daisi)\nSled(daisi, allen)\nEbony(daisi)\nEffete(daisi)\nSulcate(daisi)\nHexangular(daisi)\nGenerative(daisi)\nMisapply(daisi, allen)\nIntumesce(daisi, allen)\nforall x (Effete(x) -> Sled(x, daisi))\nforall x (Generative(x) and Sled(x, daisi) -> Intumesce(x, daisi))\n\nIntumesce(allen, allen)\n\nIntumesce(allen, allen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The yanaton pasteurise the doyle. The yanaton is luteal. The yanaton is obese. The yanaton is chunky. The yanaton is fourscore. The yanaton is gymnastic. The yanaton cease the doyle. The yanaton advise the doyle. The doyle pasteurise the yanaton. The doyle is luteal. The doyle is obese. The doyle is chunky. The doyle is fourscore. The doyle is gymnastic. The doyle cease the yanaton. The doyle advise the yanaton. If something is obese then it pasteurise the doyle. If something is gymnastic and it pasteurise the doyle then it advise the doyle. The yanaton does not like the yanaton.", "logic": "\nPasteurise(yanaton, doyle)\nLuteal(yanaton)\nObese(yanaton)\nChunky(yanaton)\nFourscore(yanaton)\nGymnastic(yanaton)\nCease(yanaton, doyle)\nAdvise(yanaton, doyle)\nPasteurise(doyle, yanaton)\nLuteal(doyle)\nObese(doyle)\nChunky(doyle)\nFourscore(doyle)\nGymnastic(doyle)\nCease(doyle, yanaton)\nAdvise(doyle, yanaton)\nforall x (Obese(x) -> Pasteurise(x, doyle))\nforall x (Gymnastic(x) and Pasteurise(x, doyle) -> Advise(x, doyle))\n\nnot Cease(yanaton, yanaton)\n\nnot Cease(yanaton, yanaton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The kathleen throttle the skylar. The kathleen is beadlike. The kathleen is scattered. The kathleen is lemonlike. The kathleen is foetal. The kathleen is nutbrown. The kathleen cauterise the skylar. The kathleen squelch the skylar. The skylar throttle the kathleen. The skylar is beadlike. The skylar is scattered. The skylar is lemonlike. The skylar is foetal. The skylar is nutbrown. The skylar cauterise the kathleen. The skylar squelch the kathleen. If something is scattered then it throttle the skylar. If something is nutbrown and it throttle the skylar then it squelch the skylar. The skylar cauterise the skylar.", "logic": "\nThrottle(kathleen, skylar)\nBeadlike(kathleen)\nScattered(kathleen)\nLemonlike(kathleen)\nFoetal(kathleen)\nNutbrown(kathleen)\nCauterise(kathleen, skylar)\nSquelch(kathleen, skylar)\nThrottle(skylar, kathleen)\nBeadlike(skylar)\nScattered(skylar)\nLemonlike(skylar)\nFoetal(skylar)\nNutbrown(skylar)\nCauterise(skylar, kathleen)\nSquelch(skylar, kathleen)\nforall x (Scattered(x) -> Throttle(x, skylar))\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) and Throttle(x, skylar) -> Squelch(x, skylar))\n\nCauterise(skylar, skylar)\n\nCauterise(skylar, skylar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1162"} {"premises": "The lorenza is vestmental. The lorenza deputize the grover. The sherye habilitate the grover. The sherye deputize the grover. The sherye deputize the hamid. The grover is asocial. The hamid is geocentric. If someone habilitate the lorenza then the lorenza deputize the hamid. If someone is asocial then they are diatomic. If someone deputize the grover and the grover is diatomic then they see the lorenza. The lorenza is vestmental.", "logic": "\nVestmental(lorenza)\nDeputize(lorenza, grover)\nHabilitate(sherye, grover)\nDeputize(sherye, grover)\nDeputize(sherye, hamid)\nAsocial(grover)\nGeocentric(hamid)\nforall x (Habilitate(x, lorenza) -> Deputize(lorenza, hamid))\nforall x (Asocial(x) -> Diatomic(x))\nforall x (Deputize(x, grover) and Diatomic(grover) -> Cement(x, lorenza))\n\nVestmental(lorenza)\n\ntherefore Vestmental(lorenza)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The timmi is agitative. The timmi deputise the suzanne. The scotti josh the suzanne. The scotti deputise the suzanne. The scotti deputise the nettie. The suzanne is drunk. The nettie is speckled. If someone josh the timmi then the timmi deputise the nettie. If someone is drunk then they are hassidic. If someone deputise the suzanne and the suzanne is hassidic then they see the timmi. The timmi does not need the suzanne.", "logic": "\nAgitative(timmi)\nDeputise(timmi, suzanne)\nJosh(scotti, suzanne)\nDeputise(scotti, suzanne)\nDeputise(scotti, nettie)\nDrunk(suzanne)\nSpeckled(nettie)\nforall x (Josh(x, timmi) -> Deputise(timmi, nettie))\nforall x (Drunk(x) -> Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Deputise(x, suzanne) and Hassidic(suzanne) -> Subrogate(x, timmi))\n\nnot Deputise(timmi, suzanne)\n\ntherefore Deputise(timmi, suzanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The merill is invariable. The merill impel the blayne. The amaleta jitterbug the blayne. The amaleta impel the blayne. The amaleta impel the oral. The blayne is astomatal. The oral is cushiony. If someone jitterbug the merill then the merill impel the oral. If someone is astomatal then they are adnexal. If someone impel the blayne and the blayne is adnexal then they see the merill. The blayne is adnexal.", "logic": "\nInvariable(merill)\nImpel(merill, blayne)\nJitterbug(amaleta, blayne)\nImpel(amaleta, blayne)\nImpel(amaleta, oral)\nAstomatal(blayne)\nCushiony(oral)\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, merill) -> Impel(merill, oral))\nforall x (Astomatal(x) -> Adnexal(x))\nforall x (Impel(x, blayne) and Adnexal(blayne) -> Discuss(x, merill))\n\nAdnexal(blayne)\n\nAstomatal(blayne) and forall x (Astomatal(x) -> Adnexal(x)) -> therefore Adnexal(blayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The karly is heroical. The karly stack the mariya. The pyotr thieve the mariya. The pyotr stack the mariya. The pyotr stack the birgit. The mariya is unsilenced. The birgit is contrary. If someone thieve the karly then the karly stack the birgit. If someone is unsilenced then they are humanistic. If someone stack the mariya and the mariya is humanistic then they see the karly. The mariya is not humanistic.", "logic": "\nHeroical(karly)\nStack(karly, mariya)\nThieve(pyotr, mariya)\nStack(pyotr, mariya)\nStack(pyotr, birgit)\nUnsilenced(mariya)\nContrary(birgit)\nforall x (Thieve(x, karly) -> Stack(karly, birgit))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Stack(x, mariya) and Humanistic(mariya) -> Emasculate(x, karly))\n\nnot Humanistic(mariya)\n\nUnsilenced(mariya) and forall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Humanistic(x)) -> therefore Humanistic(mariya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The isabella is arguable. The isabella coerce the yacov. The gilberta dawdle the yacov. The gilberta coerce the yacov. The gilberta coerce the rhea. The yacov is harmonized. The rhea is unworthy. If someone dawdle the isabella then the isabella coerce the rhea. If someone is harmonized then they are ratty. If someone coerce the yacov and the yacov is ratty then they see the isabella. The isabella prawn the isabella.", "logic": "\nArguable(isabella)\nCoerce(isabella, yacov)\nDawdle(gilberta, yacov)\nCoerce(gilberta, yacov)\nCoerce(gilberta, rhea)\nHarmonized(yacov)\nUnworthy(rhea)\nforall x (Dawdle(x, isabella) -> Coerce(isabella, rhea))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) -> Ratty(x))\nforall x (Coerce(x, yacov) and Ratty(yacov) -> Prawn(x, isabella))\n\nPrawn(isabella, isabella)\n\nHarmonized(yacov) and forall x (Harmonized(x) -> Ratty(x)) -> therefore Ratty(yacov) Coerce(isabella, yacov) and Ratty(yacov) and forall x (Coerce(x, yacov) and Ratty(yacov) -> Prawn(x, isabella)) -> therefore Prawn(isabella, isabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The temp is impeding. The temp huckster the jessie. The hilton syllabise the jessie. The hilton huckster the jessie. The hilton huckster the ashlen. The jessie is recyclable. The ashlen is puny. If someone syllabise the temp then the temp huckster the ashlen. If someone is recyclable then they are punitory. If someone huckster the jessie and the jessie is punitory then they see the temp. The temp does not see the temp.", "logic": "\nImpeding(temp)\nHuckster(temp, jessie)\nSyllabise(hilton, jessie)\nHuckster(hilton, jessie)\nHuckster(hilton, ashlen)\nRecyclable(jessie)\nPuny(ashlen)\nforall x (Syllabise(x, temp) -> Huckster(temp, ashlen))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) -> Punitory(x))\nforall x (Huckster(x, jessie) and Punitory(jessie) -> Radicalize(x, temp))\n\nnot Radicalize(temp, temp)\n\nRecyclable(jessie) and forall x (Recyclable(x) -> Punitory(x)) -> therefore Punitory(jessie) Huckster(temp, jessie) and Punitory(jessie) and forall x (Huckster(x, jessie) and Punitory(jessie) -> Radicalize(x, temp)) -> therefore Radicalize(temp, temp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The hermina is sunless. The hermina jactitate the margi. The gerladina cipher the margi. The gerladina jactitate the margi. The gerladina jactitate the nina. The margi is insolvable. The nina is alloyed. If someone cipher the hermina then the hermina jactitate the nina. If someone is insolvable then they are eloquent. If someone jactitate the margi and the margi is eloquent then they see the hermina. The hermina does not need the nina.", "logic": "\nSunless(hermina)\nJactitate(hermina, margi)\nCipher(gerladina, margi)\nJactitate(gerladina, margi)\nJactitate(gerladina, nina)\nInsolvable(margi)\nAlloyed(nina)\nforall x (Cipher(x, hermina) -> Jactitate(hermina, nina))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) -> Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, margi) and Eloquent(margi) -> Staunch(x, hermina))\n\nnot Jactitate(hermina, nina)\n\nforall x (Cipher(x, hermina) -> Jactitate(hermina, nina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The morly is italian. The morly disgust the lettie. The donielle magnify the lettie. The donielle disgust the lettie. The donielle disgust the romain. The lettie is cadaverous. The romain is cuboid. If someone magnify the morly then the morly disgust the romain. If someone is cadaverous then they are smoothbore. If someone disgust the lettie and the lettie is smoothbore then they see the morly. The donielle is smoothbore.", "logic": "\nItalian(morly)\nDisgust(morly, lettie)\nMagnify(donielle, lettie)\nDisgust(donielle, lettie)\nDisgust(donielle, romain)\nCadaverous(lettie)\nCuboid(romain)\nforall x (Magnify(x, morly) -> Disgust(morly, romain))\nforall x (Cadaverous(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Disgust(x, lettie) and Smoothbore(lettie) -> Sole(x, morly))\n\nSmoothbore(donielle)\n\nforall x (Cadaverous(x) -> Smoothbore(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The carlin is ebony. The carlin squander the chandra. The chaunce increase the chandra. The chaunce squander the chandra. The chaunce squander the lusa. The chandra is recorded. The lusa is pucka. If someone increase the carlin then the carlin squander the lusa. If someone is recorded then they are awless. If someone squander the chandra and the chandra is awless then they see the carlin. The carlin is not awless.", "logic": "\nEbony(carlin)\nSquander(carlin, chandra)\nIncrease(chaunce, chandra)\nSquander(chaunce, chandra)\nSquander(chaunce, lusa)\nRecorded(chandra)\nPucka(lusa)\nforall x (Increase(x, carlin) -> Squander(carlin, lusa))\nforall x (Recorded(x) -> Awless(x))\nforall x (Squander(x, chandra) and Awless(chandra) -> True(x, carlin))\n\nnot Awless(carlin)\n\nforall x (Recorded(x) -> Awless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The veriee is batrachian. The veriee size the jacenta. The tresa contemn the jacenta. The tresa size the jacenta. The tresa size the jyoti. The jacenta is pupal. The jyoti is dignifying. If someone contemn the veriee then the veriee size the jyoti. If someone is pupal then they are polygynous. If someone size the jacenta and the jacenta is polygynous then they see the veriee. The veriee parse the jacenta.", "logic": "\nBatrachian(veriee)\nSize(veriee, jacenta)\nContemn(tresa, jacenta)\nSize(tresa, jacenta)\nSize(tresa, jyoti)\nPupal(jacenta)\nDignifying(jyoti)\nforall x (Contemn(x, veriee) -> Size(veriee, jyoti))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Polygynous(x))\nforall x (Size(x, jacenta) and Polygynous(jacenta) -> Parse(x, veriee))\n\nParse(veriee, jacenta)\n\nParse(veriee, jacenta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The emmye is thriving. The emmye fawn the gus. The tomlin judge the gus. The tomlin fawn the gus. The tomlin fawn the latashia. The gus is abducent. The latashia is dimmed. If someone judge the emmye then the emmye fawn the latashia. If someone is abducent then they are unsatiable. If someone fawn the gus and the gus is unsatiable then they see the emmye. The latashia does not like the gus.", "logic": "\nThriving(emmye)\nFawn(emmye, gus)\nJudge(tomlin, gus)\nFawn(tomlin, gus)\nFawn(tomlin, latashia)\nAbducent(gus)\nDimmed(latashia)\nforall x (Judge(x, emmye) -> Fawn(emmye, latashia))\nforall x (Abducent(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nforall x (Fawn(x, gus) and Unsatiable(gus) -> Display(x, emmye))\n\nnot Judge(latashia, gus)\n\nnot Judge(latashia, gus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The oliy is xxxv. The oliy bundle the antonio. The anastasie unbridle the antonio. The anastasie bundle the antonio. The anastasie bundle the hattie. The antonio is careful. The hattie is aforesaid. If someone unbridle the oliy then the oliy bundle the hattie. If someone is careful then they are audacious. If someone bundle the antonio and the antonio is audacious then they see the oliy. The antonio is big.", "logic": "\nXxxv(oliy)\nBundle(oliy, antonio)\nUnbridle(anastasie, antonio)\nBundle(anastasie, antonio)\nBundle(anastasie, hattie)\nCareful(antonio)\nAforesaid(hattie)\nforall x (Unbridle(x, oliy) -> Bundle(oliy, hattie))\nforall x (Careful(x) -> Audacious(x))\nforall x (Bundle(x, antonio) and Audacious(antonio) -> Notch(x, oliy))\n\nBig(antonio)\n\nBig(antonio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "The dru is nomadic. The dru is epigastric. The dru is laureate. All epigastric, statute people are triangular. Green, laureate people are statute. If the dru is triangular then the dru is laureate. The dru is epigastric.", "logic": "\nNomadic(dru)\nEpigastric(dru)\nLaureate(dru)\nforall x (Epigastric(x) and Statute(x) -> Triangular(x))\nforall x (Epigastric(x) and Laureate(x) -> Statute(x))\nTriangular(dru) -> Laureate(dru)\n\nEpigastric(dru)\n\ntherefore Epigastric(dru)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "The alameda is benefic. The alameda is saporous. The alameda is perfidious. All saporous, walleyed people are major. Green, perfidious people are walleyed. If the alameda is major then the alameda is perfidious. The alameda is not benefic.", "logic": "\nBenefic(alameda)\nSaporous(alameda)\nPerfidious(alameda)\nforall x (Saporous(x) and Walleyed(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Saporous(x) and Perfidious(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nMajor(alameda) -> Perfidious(alameda)\n\nnot Benefic(alameda)\n\ntherefore Benefic(alameda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "The joan is doubled. The joan is debonnaire. The joan is current. All debonnaire, paradisaic people are earthbound. Green, current people are paradisaic. If the joan is earthbound then the joan is current. The joan is paradisaic.", "logic": "\nDoubled(joan)\nDebonnaire(joan)\nCurrent(joan)\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and Paradisaic(x) -> Earthbound(x))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and Current(x) -> Paradisaic(x))\nEarthbound(joan) -> Current(joan)\n\nParadisaic(joan)\n\nDebonnaire(joan) and Current(joan) and forall x (Debonnaire(x) and Current(x) -> Paradisaic(x)) -> therefore Paradisaic(joan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "The kimberly is unfinished. The kimberly is assumptive. The kimberly is wealthy. All assumptive, licked people are wheaten. Green, wealthy people are licked. If the kimberly is wheaten then the kimberly is wealthy. The kimberly is not licked.", "logic": "\nUnfinished(kimberly)\nAssumptive(kimberly)\nWealthy(kimberly)\nforall x (Assumptive(x) and Licked(x) -> Wheaten(x))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) and Wealthy(x) -> Licked(x))\nWheaten(kimberly) -> Wealthy(kimberly)\n\nnot Licked(kimberly)\n\nAssumptive(kimberly) and Wealthy(kimberly) and forall x (Assumptive(x) and Wealthy(x) -> Licked(x)) -> therefore Licked(kimberly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "The kenna is motherly. The kenna is unsound. The kenna is amphoteric. All unsound, serrulate people are gifted. Green, amphoteric people are serrulate. If the kenna is gifted then the kenna is amphoteric. The kenna is gifted.", "logic": "\nMotherly(kenna)\nUnsound(kenna)\nAmphoteric(kenna)\nforall x (Unsound(x) and Serrulate(x) -> Gifted(x))\nforall x (Unsound(x) and Amphoteric(x) -> Serrulate(x))\nGifted(kenna) -> Amphoteric(kenna)\n\nGifted(kenna)\n\nUnsound(kenna) and Amphoteric(kenna) and forall x (Unsound(x) and Amphoteric(x) -> Serrulate(x)) -> therefore Serrulate(kenna) Unsound(kenna) and Serrulate(kenna) and forall x (Unsound(x) and Serrulate(x) -> Gifted(x)) -> therefore Gifted(kenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "The ferdinand is facile. The ferdinand is ungallant. The ferdinand is italian. All ungallant, rootbound people are subfusc. Green, italian people are rootbound. If the ferdinand is subfusc then the ferdinand is italian. The ferdinand is not subfusc.", "logic": "\nFacile(ferdinand)\nUngallant(ferdinand)\nItalian(ferdinand)\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Rootbound(x) -> Subfusc(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Italian(x) -> Rootbound(x))\nSubfusc(ferdinand) -> Italian(ferdinand)\n\nnot Subfusc(ferdinand)\n\nUngallant(ferdinand) and Italian(ferdinand) and forall x (Ungallant(x) and Italian(x) -> Rootbound(x)) -> therefore Rootbound(ferdinand) Ungallant(ferdinand) and Rootbound(ferdinand) and forall x (Ungallant(x) and Rootbound(x) -> Subfusc(x)) -> therefore Subfusc(ferdinand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "The tomasina is matte. The tomasina is unmediated. The tomasina is aramaic. All unmediated, derisive people are outspoken. Green, aramaic people are derisive. If the tomasina is outspoken then the tomasina is aramaic. The tomasina does not chase the tomasina.", "logic": "\nMatte(tomasina)\nUnmediated(tomasina)\nAramaic(tomasina)\nforall x (Unmediated(x) and Derisive(x) -> Outspoken(x))\nforall x (Unmediated(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Derisive(x))\nOutspoken(tomasina) -> Aramaic(tomasina)\n\nnot Chases(tomasina, tomasina)\n\nnot Chases(tomasina, tomasina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "The sal is nonsexual. The sal is succinct. The sal is pinkish. All succinct, devoid people are crenulated. Green, pinkish people are devoid. If the sal is crenulated then the sal is pinkish. The sal visits the sal.", "logic": "\nNonsexual(sal)\nSuccinct(sal)\nPinkish(sal)\nforall x (Succinct(x) and Devoid(x) -> Crenulated(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) and Pinkish(x) -> Devoid(x))\nCrenulated(sal) -> Pinkish(sal)\n\nVisits(sal, sal)\n\nVisits(sal, sal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-777"} {"premises": "Antoine is buttonlike. Rosanne is upcurved. Dodie is upcurved. White things are self. All self things are masonic. Rosanne is upcurved.", "logic": "\nButtonlike(antoine)\nUpcurved(rosanne)\nUpcurved(dodie)\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Self(x))\nforall x (Self(x) -> Masonic(x))\n\nUpcurved(rosanne)\n\ntherefore Upcurved(rosanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Vito is mutational. Margalo is asynergic. Tarrance is asynergic. White things are waning. All waning things are allylic. Tarrance is not asynergic.", "logic": "\nMutational(vito)\nAsynergic(margalo)\nAsynergic(tarrance)\nforall x (Mutational(x) -> Waning(x))\nforall x (Waning(x) -> Allylic(x))\n\nnot Asynergic(tarrance)\n\ntherefore Asynergic(tarrance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Marlee is shaped. Erda is plaintive. Elric is plaintive. White things are ankylotic. All ankylotic things are jellylike. Marlee is ankylotic.", "logic": "\nShaped(marlee)\nPlaintive(erda)\nPlaintive(elric)\nforall x (Shaped(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Jellylike(x))\n\nAnkylotic(marlee)\n\nShaped(marlee) and forall x (Shaped(x) -> Ankylotic(x)) -> therefore Ankylotic(marlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Felicity is salubrious. Jeffie is modulated. Olive is modulated. White things are woodsy. All woodsy things are uproarious. Felicity is not woodsy.", "logic": "\nSalubrious(felicity)\nModulated(jeffie)\nModulated(olive)\nforall x (Salubrious(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Woodsy(x) -> Uproarious(x))\n\nnot Woodsy(felicity)\n\nSalubrious(felicity) and forall x (Salubrious(x) -> Woodsy(x)) -> therefore Woodsy(felicity)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Priscella is untactful. Thurston is filial. Debra is filial. White things are underarm. All underarm things are alkylic. Priscella is alkylic.", "logic": "\nUntactful(priscella)\nFilial(thurston)\nFilial(debra)\nforall x (Untactful(x) -> Underarm(x))\nforall x (Underarm(x) -> Alkylic(x))\n\nAlkylic(priscella)\n\nUntactful(priscella) and forall x (Untactful(x) -> Underarm(x)) -> therefore Underarm(priscella) Underarm(priscella) and forall x (Underarm(x) -> Alkylic(x)) -> therefore Alkylic(priscella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Jesus is blusterous. Joane is mucky. Shir is mucky. White things are unattached. All unattached things are sapphic. Jesus is not sapphic.", "logic": "\nBlusterous(jesus)\nMucky(joane)\nMucky(shir)\nforall x (Blusterous(x) -> Unattached(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) -> Sapphic(x))\n\nnot Sapphic(jesus)\n\nBlusterous(jesus) and forall x (Blusterous(x) -> Unattached(x)) -> therefore Unattached(jesus) Unattached(jesus) and forall x (Unattached(x) -> Sapphic(x)) -> therefore Sapphic(jesus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Kare is pedagogic. Creighton is attractive. Monika is attractive. White things are nebulose. All nebulose things are abominable. Monika is not abominable.", "logic": "\nPedagogic(kare)\nAttractive(creighton)\nAttractive(monika)\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Nebulose(x) -> Abominable(x))\n\nnot Abominable(monika)\n\nforall x (Nebulose(x) -> Abominable(x)) <- forall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Nebulose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "David is algid. Terence is savory. Vivianna is savory. White things are wysiwyg. All wysiwyg things are stoic. Vivianna is wysiwyg.", "logic": "\nAlgid(david)\nSavory(terence)\nSavory(vivianna)\nforall x (Algid(x) -> Wysiwyg(x))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) -> Stoic(x))\n\nWysiwyg(vivianna)\n\nforall x (Algid(x) -> Wysiwyg(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Maritsa is drained. Elyssa is chinked. Gabrila is chinked. White things are unitary. All unitary things are monocarpic. Elyssa is not monocarpic.", "logic": "\nDrained(maritsa)\nChinked(elyssa)\nChinked(gabrila)\nforall x (Drained(x) -> Unitary(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Monocarpic(x))\n\nnot Monocarpic(elyssa)\n\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Monocarpic(x)) <- forall x (Drained(x) -> Unitary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Genni is spangly. Laurice is miraculous. Tamera is miraculous. White things are anaphasic. All anaphasic things are inchoative. Laurice is round.", "logic": "\nSpangly(genni)\nMiraculous(laurice)\nMiraculous(tamera)\nforall x (Spangly(x) -> Anaphasic(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) -> Inchoative(x))\n\nRound(laurice)\n\nRound(laurice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Cleo is decrepit. Barbie is incoherent. Hynda is incoherent. White things are awless. All awless things are awakened. Cleo is not rough.", "logic": "\nDecrepit(cleo)\nIncoherent(barbie)\nIncoherent(hynda)\nforall x (Decrepit(x) -> Awless(x))\nforall x (Awless(x) -> Awakened(x))\n\nnot Rough(cleo)\n\nnot Rough(cleo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "Clayborn is retracted. Mariele is amniotic. Skippie is amniotic. White things are vernacular. All vernacular things are crenulated. Clayborn is round.", "logic": "\nRetracted(clayborn)\nAmniotic(mariele)\nAmniotic(skippie)\nforall x (Retracted(x) -> Vernacular(x))\nforall x (Vernacular(x) -> Crenulated(x))\n\nRound(clayborn)\n\nRound(clayborn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1486"} {"premises": "The locke invade the gershom. The locke invade the stacee. The locke addict the stacee. The locke find the fayette. The gershom is uncleared. The gershom is unpackaged. The gershom is startled. The gershom addict the locke. The fayette does not eat the gershom. The fayette is unpackaged. The fayette is prescribed. The fayette addict the gershom. The stacee invade the locke. The stacee addict the fayette. The stacee find the gershom. If the locke is prescribed and the locke find the fayette then the fayette find the stacee. If something invade the gershom then it is prescribed. The fayette addict the gershom.", "logic": "\nInvade(locke, gershom)\nInvade(locke, stacee)\nAddict(locke, stacee)\nFind(locke, fayette)\nUncleared(gershom)\nUnpackaged(gershom)\nStartled(gershom)\nAddict(gershom, locke)\nnot Invade(fayette, gershom)\nUnpackaged(fayette)\nPrescribed(fayette)\nAddict(fayette, gershom)\nInvade(stacee, locke)\nAddict(stacee, fayette)\nFind(stacee, gershom)\nPrescribed(locke) and Find(locke, fayette) -> Find(fayette, stacee)\nforall x (Invade(x, gershom) -> Prescribed(x))\n\nAddict(fayette, gershom)\n\ntherefore Addict(fayette, gershom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The pammie degauss the lyda. The pammie degauss the kori. The pammie demur the kori. The pammie rouse the konstance. The lyda is akin. The lyda is ravenous. The lyda is royal. The lyda demur the pammie. The konstance does not eat the lyda. The konstance is ravenous. The konstance is aestival. The konstance demur the lyda. The kori degauss the pammie. The kori demur the konstance. The kori rouse the lyda. If the pammie is aestival and the pammie rouse the konstance then the konstance rouse the kori. If something degauss the lyda then it is aestival. The konstance degauss the lyda.", "logic": "\nDegauss(pammie, lyda)\nDegauss(pammie, kori)\nDemur(pammie, kori)\nRouse(pammie, konstance)\nAkin(lyda)\nRavenous(lyda)\nRoyal(lyda)\nDemur(lyda, pammie)\nnot Degauss(konstance, lyda)\nRavenous(konstance)\nAestival(konstance)\nDemur(konstance, lyda)\nDegauss(kori, pammie)\nDemur(kori, konstance)\nRouse(kori, lyda)\nAestival(pammie) and Rouse(pammie, konstance) -> Rouse(konstance, kori)\nforall x (Degauss(x, lyda) -> Aestival(x))\n\nDegauss(konstance, lyda)\n\ntherefore not Degauss(konstance, lyda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The ariella fluoridate the nicolina. The ariella fluoridate the irwin. The ariella aggrandise the irwin. The ariella aluminize the adnan. The nicolina is liberal. The nicolina is ablated. The nicolina is mendacious. The nicolina aggrandise the ariella. The adnan does not eat the nicolina. The adnan is ablated. The adnan is stemmed. The adnan aggrandise the nicolina. The irwin fluoridate the ariella. The irwin aggrandise the adnan. The irwin aluminize the nicolina. If the ariella is stemmed and the ariella aluminize the adnan then the adnan aluminize the irwin. If something fluoridate the nicolina then it is stemmed. The ariella is stemmed.", "logic": "\nFluoridate(ariella, nicolina)\nFluoridate(ariella, irwin)\nAggrandise(ariella, irwin)\nAluminize(ariella, adnan)\nLiberal(nicolina)\nAblated(nicolina)\nMendacious(nicolina)\nAggrandise(nicolina, ariella)\nnot Fluoridate(adnan, nicolina)\nAblated(adnan)\nStemmed(adnan)\nAggrandise(adnan, nicolina)\nFluoridate(irwin, ariella)\nAggrandise(irwin, adnan)\nAluminize(irwin, nicolina)\nStemmed(ariella) and Aluminize(ariella, adnan) -> Aluminize(adnan, irwin)\nforall x (Fluoridate(x, nicolina) -> Stemmed(x))\n\nStemmed(ariella)\n\nFluoridate(ariella, nicolina) and forall x (Fluoridate(x, nicolina) -> Stemmed(x)) -> therefore Stemmed(ariella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The hilary butylate the alecia. The hilary butylate the freddy. The hilary tree the freddy. The hilary slur the genna. The alecia is diagnostic. The alecia is punishing. The alecia is javanese. The alecia tree the hilary. The genna does not eat the alecia. The genna is punishing. The genna is sluttish. The genna tree the alecia. The freddy butylate the hilary. The freddy tree the genna. The freddy slur the alecia. If the hilary is sluttish and the hilary slur the genna then the genna slur the freddy. If something butylate the alecia then it is sluttish. The hilary is not sluttish.", "logic": "\nButylate(hilary, alecia)\nButylate(hilary, freddy)\nTree(hilary, freddy)\nSlur(hilary, genna)\nDiagnostic(alecia)\nPunishing(alecia)\nJavanese(alecia)\nTree(alecia, hilary)\nnot Butylate(genna, alecia)\nPunishing(genna)\nSluttish(genna)\nTree(genna, alecia)\nButylate(freddy, hilary)\nTree(freddy, genna)\nSlur(freddy, alecia)\nSluttish(hilary) and Slur(hilary, genna) -> Slur(genna, freddy)\nforall x (Butylate(x, alecia) -> Sluttish(x))\n\nnot Sluttish(hilary)\n\nButylate(hilary, alecia) and forall x (Butylate(x, alecia) -> Sluttish(x)) -> therefore Sluttish(hilary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The troy balk the peta. The troy balk the kingsley. The troy deoxidise the kingsley. The troy frown the ailina. The peta is deep. The peta is basined. The peta is lamarckian. The peta deoxidise the troy. The ailina does not eat the peta. The ailina is basined. The ailina is mandaean. The ailina deoxidise the peta. The kingsley balk the troy. The kingsley deoxidise the ailina. The kingsley frown the peta. If the troy is mandaean and the troy frown the ailina then the ailina frown the kingsley. If something balk the peta then it is mandaean. The ailina frown the kingsley.", "logic": "\nBalk(troy, peta)\nBalk(troy, kingsley)\nDeoxidise(troy, kingsley)\nFrown(troy, ailina)\nDeep(peta)\nBasined(peta)\nLamarckian(peta)\nDeoxidise(peta, troy)\nnot Balk(ailina, peta)\nBasined(ailina)\nMandaean(ailina)\nDeoxidise(ailina, peta)\nBalk(kingsley, troy)\nDeoxidise(kingsley, ailina)\nFrown(kingsley, peta)\nMandaean(troy) and Frown(troy, ailina) -> Frown(ailina, kingsley)\nforall x (Balk(x, peta) -> Mandaean(x))\n\nFrown(ailina, kingsley)\n\nBalk(troy, peta) and forall x (Balk(x, peta) -> Mandaean(x)) -> therefore Mandaean(troy) Mandaean(troy) and Frown(troy, ailina) and Mandaean(troy) and Frown(troy, ailina) -> Frown(ailina, kingsley) -> therefore Frown(ailina, kingsley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The johnny regret the peg. The johnny regret the gomer. The johnny subtend the gomer. The johnny endow the benjamin. The peg is interlaced. The peg is moravian. The peg is affixial. The peg subtend the johnny. The benjamin does not eat the peg. The benjamin is moravian. The benjamin is bisulcate. The benjamin subtend the peg. The gomer regret the johnny. The gomer subtend the benjamin. The gomer endow the peg. If the johnny is bisulcate and the johnny endow the benjamin then the benjamin endow the gomer. If something regret the peg then it is bisulcate. The benjamin does not see the gomer.", "logic": "\nRegret(johnny, peg)\nRegret(johnny, gomer)\nSubtend(johnny, gomer)\nEndow(johnny, benjamin)\nInterlaced(peg)\nMoravian(peg)\nAffixial(peg)\nSubtend(peg, johnny)\nnot Regret(benjamin, peg)\nMoravian(benjamin)\nBisulcate(benjamin)\nSubtend(benjamin, peg)\nRegret(gomer, johnny)\nSubtend(gomer, benjamin)\nEndow(gomer, peg)\nBisulcate(johnny) and Endow(johnny, benjamin) -> Endow(benjamin, gomer)\nforall x (Regret(x, peg) -> Bisulcate(x))\n\nnot Endow(benjamin, gomer)\n\nRegret(johnny, peg) and forall x (Regret(x, peg) -> Bisulcate(x)) -> therefore Bisulcate(johnny) Bisulcate(johnny) and Endow(johnny, benjamin) and Bisulcate(johnny) and Endow(johnny, benjamin) -> Endow(benjamin, gomer) -> therefore Endow(benjamin, gomer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The steffen send the normie. The steffen send the courtney. The steffen upchuck the courtney. The steffen marinate the nahum. The normie is somnolent. The normie is eudemonic. The normie is inclement. The normie upchuck the steffen. The nahum does not eat the normie. The nahum is eudemonic. The nahum is oily. The nahum upchuck the normie. The courtney send the steffen. The courtney upchuck the nahum. The courtney marinate the normie. If the steffen is oily and the steffen marinate the nahum then the nahum marinate the courtney. If something send the normie then it is oily. The courtney is not oily.", "logic": "\nSend(steffen, normie)\nSend(steffen, courtney)\nUpchuck(steffen, courtney)\nMarinate(steffen, nahum)\nSomnolent(normie)\nEudemonic(normie)\nInclement(normie)\nUpchuck(normie, steffen)\nnot Send(nahum, normie)\nEudemonic(nahum)\nOily(nahum)\nUpchuck(nahum, normie)\nSend(courtney, steffen)\nUpchuck(courtney, nahum)\nMarinate(courtney, normie)\nOily(steffen) and Marinate(steffen, nahum) -> Marinate(nahum, courtney)\nforall x (Send(x, normie) -> Oily(x))\n\nnot Oily(courtney)\n\nforall x (Send(x, normie) -> Oily(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The aristotle melanize the kynthia. The aristotle melanize the merna. The aristotle board the merna. The aristotle adjure the bettina. The kynthia is poky. The kynthia is educative. The kynthia is allotted. The kynthia board the aristotle. The bettina does not eat the kynthia. The bettina is educative. The bettina is freshman. The bettina board the kynthia. The merna melanize the aristotle. The merna board the bettina. The merna adjure the kynthia. If the aristotle is freshman and the aristotle adjure the bettina then the bettina adjure the merna. If something melanize the kynthia then it is freshman. The kynthia is freshman.", "logic": "\nMelanize(aristotle, kynthia)\nMelanize(aristotle, merna)\nBoard(aristotle, merna)\nAdjure(aristotle, bettina)\nPoky(kynthia)\nEducative(kynthia)\nAllotted(kynthia)\nBoard(kynthia, aristotle)\nnot Melanize(bettina, kynthia)\nEducative(bettina)\nFreshman(bettina)\nBoard(bettina, kynthia)\nMelanize(merna, aristotle)\nBoard(merna, bettina)\nAdjure(merna, kynthia)\nFreshman(aristotle) and Adjure(aristotle, bettina) -> Adjure(bettina, merna)\nforall x (Melanize(x, kynthia) -> Freshman(x))\n\nFreshman(kynthia)\n\nforall x (Melanize(x, kynthia) -> Freshman(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The monroe tarry the desiri. The monroe tarry the izzi. The monroe spiritise the izzi. The monroe attend the carroll. The desiri is agnostic. The desiri is latest. The desiri is tubeless. The desiri spiritise the monroe. The carroll does not eat the desiri. The carroll is latest. The carroll is unordered. The carroll spiritise the desiri. The izzi tarry the monroe. The izzi spiritise the carroll. The izzi attend the desiri. If the monroe is unordered and the monroe attend the carroll then the carroll attend the izzi. If something tarry the desiri then it is unordered. The carroll does not eat the izzi.", "logic": "\nTarry(monroe, desiri)\nTarry(monroe, izzi)\nSpiritise(monroe, izzi)\nAttend(monroe, carroll)\nAgnostic(desiri)\nLatest(desiri)\nTubeless(desiri)\nSpiritise(desiri, monroe)\nnot Tarry(carroll, desiri)\nLatest(carroll)\nUnordered(carroll)\nSpiritise(carroll, desiri)\nTarry(izzi, monroe)\nSpiritise(izzi, carroll)\nAttend(izzi, desiri)\nUnordered(monroe) and Attend(monroe, carroll) -> Attend(carroll, izzi)\nforall x (Tarry(x, desiri) -> Unordered(x))\n\nnot Tarry(carroll, izzi)\n\nnot Tarry(carroll, izzi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The kattie slush the parker. The kattie slush the bailie. The kattie crack the bailie. The kattie frog the jenifer. The parker is detested. The parker is fraught. The parker is iraki. The parker crack the kattie. The jenifer does not eat the parker. The jenifer is fraught. The jenifer is indigent. The jenifer crack the parker. The bailie slush the kattie. The bailie crack the jenifer. The bailie frog the parker. If the kattie is indigent and the kattie frog the jenifer then the jenifer frog the bailie. If something slush the parker then it is indigent. The jenifer is iraki.", "logic": "\nSlush(kattie, parker)\nSlush(kattie, bailie)\nCrack(kattie, bailie)\nFrog(kattie, jenifer)\nDetested(parker)\nFraught(parker)\nIraki(parker)\nCrack(parker, kattie)\nnot Slush(jenifer, parker)\nFraught(jenifer)\nIndigent(jenifer)\nCrack(jenifer, parker)\nSlush(bailie, kattie)\nCrack(bailie, jenifer)\nFrog(bailie, parker)\nIndigent(kattie) and Frog(kattie, jenifer) -> Frog(jenifer, bailie)\nforall x (Slush(x, parker) -> Indigent(x))\n\nIraki(jenifer)\n\nIraki(jenifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The lynette aphorise the monte. The lynette aphorise the elyse. The lynette restate the elyse. The lynette salivate the slade. The monte is emaciated. The monte is spidery. The monte is unconfused. The monte restate the lynette. The slade does not eat the monte. The slade is spidery. The slade is explicable. The slade restate the monte. The elyse aphorise the lynette. The elyse restate the slade. The elyse salivate the monte. If the lynette is explicable and the lynette salivate the slade then the slade salivate the elyse. If something aphorise the monte then it is explicable. The elyse does not eat the slade.", "logic": "\nAphorise(lynette, monte)\nAphorise(lynette, elyse)\nRestate(lynette, elyse)\nSalivate(lynette, slade)\nEmaciated(monte)\nSpidery(monte)\nUnconfused(monte)\nRestate(monte, lynette)\nnot Aphorise(slade, monte)\nSpidery(slade)\nExplicable(slade)\nRestate(slade, monte)\nAphorise(elyse, lynette)\nRestate(elyse, slade)\nSalivate(elyse, monte)\nExplicable(lynette) and Salivate(lynette, slade) -> Salivate(slade, elyse)\nforall x (Aphorise(x, monte) -> Explicable(x))\n\nnot Aphorise(elyse, slade)\n\nnot Aphorise(elyse, slade) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "The thor reify the mylo. The thor reify the leiah. The thor protect the leiah. The thor carburet the gideon. The mylo is nauseated. The mylo is immobile. The mylo is ferny. The mylo protect the thor. The gideon does not eat the mylo. The gideon is immobile. The gideon is anapaestic. The gideon protect the mylo. The leiah reify the thor. The leiah protect the gideon. The leiah carburet the mylo. If the thor is anapaestic and the thor carburet the gideon then the gideon carburet the leiah. If something reify the mylo then it is anapaestic. The mylo reify the mylo.", "logic": "\nReify(thor, mylo)\nReify(thor, leiah)\nProtect(thor, leiah)\nCarburet(thor, gideon)\nNauseated(mylo)\nImmobile(mylo)\nFerny(mylo)\nProtect(mylo, thor)\nnot Reify(gideon, mylo)\nImmobile(gideon)\nAnapaestic(gideon)\nProtect(gideon, mylo)\nReify(leiah, thor)\nProtect(leiah, gideon)\nCarburet(leiah, mylo)\nAnapaestic(thor) and Carburet(thor, gideon) -> Carburet(gideon, leiah)\nforall x (Reify(x, mylo) -> Anapaestic(x))\n\nReify(mylo, mylo)\n\nReify(mylo, mylo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-324"} {"premises": "Leena is spayed. Herman is sardinian. Theda is libellous. Rollin is ismaili. All mouthlike things are sardinian. All ismaili things are mouthlike. Rollin is ismaili.", "logic": "\nSpayed(leena)\nSardinian(herman)\nLibellous(theda)\nIsmaili(rollin)\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) -> Sardinian(x))\nforall x (Ismaili(x) -> Mouthlike(x))\n\nIsmaili(rollin)\n\ntherefore Ismaili(rollin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Roselia is analgesic. Sanders is fringed. Bailey is nodulated. Clary is harmonic. All dampish things are fringed. All harmonic things are dampish. Bailey is not nodulated.", "logic": "\nAnalgesic(roselia)\nFringed(sanders)\nNodulated(bailey)\nHarmonic(clary)\nforall x (Dampish(x) -> Fringed(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Dampish(x))\n\nnot Nodulated(bailey)\n\ntherefore Nodulated(bailey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Emilio is bestial. Rosaline is timorese. Jackie is ironlike. Christian is labiate. All clxxx things are timorese. All labiate things are clxxx. Christian is clxxx.", "logic": "\nBestial(emilio)\nTimorese(rosaline)\nIronlike(jackie)\nLabiate(christian)\nforall x (Clxxx(x) -> Timorese(x))\nforall x (Labiate(x) -> Clxxx(x))\n\nClxxx(christian)\n\nLabiate(christian) and forall x (Labiate(x) -> Clxxx(x)) -> therefore Clxxx(christian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Adger is biweekly. Emera is acerb. Galen is attentive. Rory is lamplit. All aerophilic things are acerb. All lamplit things are aerophilic. Rory is not aerophilic.", "logic": "\nBiweekly(adger)\nAcerb(emera)\nAttentive(galen)\nLamplit(rory)\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Acerb(x))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\n\nnot Aerophilic(rory)\n\nLamplit(rory) and forall x (Lamplit(x) -> Aerophilic(x)) -> therefore Aerophilic(rory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Libbie is diaphanous. Caspar is apsidal. Thorndike is ploughed. Avi is deserving. All striate things are apsidal. All deserving things are striate. Avi is apsidal.", "logic": "\nDiaphanous(libbie)\nApsidal(caspar)\nPloughed(thorndike)\nDeserving(avi)\nforall x (Striate(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Striate(x))\n\nApsidal(avi)\n\nDeserving(avi) and forall x (Deserving(x) -> Striate(x)) -> therefore Striate(avi) Striate(avi) and forall x (Striate(x) -> Apsidal(x)) -> therefore Apsidal(avi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Bridget is perfumed. Mack is unsanitary. Mathew is diclinous. Jeremiah is industrial. All forensic things are unsanitary. All industrial things are forensic. Jeremiah is not unsanitary.", "logic": "\nPerfumed(bridget)\nUnsanitary(mack)\nDiclinous(mathew)\nIndustrial(jeremiah)\nforall x (Forensic(x) -> Unsanitary(x))\nforall x (Industrial(x) -> Forensic(x))\n\nnot Unsanitary(jeremiah)\n\nIndustrial(jeremiah) and forall x (Industrial(x) -> Forensic(x)) -> therefore Forensic(jeremiah) Forensic(jeremiah) and forall x (Forensic(x) -> Unsanitary(x)) -> therefore Unsanitary(jeremiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Marisa is chesty. Binni is apropos. Dyane is naughty. Kathryne is gloomful. All apophatic things are apropos. All gloomful things are apophatic. Marisa is not apropos.", "logic": "\nChesty(marisa)\nApropos(binni)\nNaughty(dyane)\nGloomful(kathryne)\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Gloomful(x) -> Apophatic(x))\n\nnot Apropos(marisa)\n\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Apropos(x)) <- forall x (Gloomful(x) -> Apophatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Mommy is towheaded. Romona is itinerant. Laurette is emarginate. Tiebold is powered. All bowed things are itinerant. All powered things are bowed. Romona is bowed.", "logic": "\nTowheaded(mommy)\nItinerant(romona)\nEmarginate(laurette)\nPowered(tiebold)\nforall x (Bowed(x) -> Itinerant(x))\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Bowed(x))\n\nBowed(romona)\n\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Bowed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Sheeree is nonlinear. Maxine is saline. Clyde is broadside. Meyer is sinkable. All samoan things are saline. All sinkable things are samoan. Clyde is not samoan.", "logic": "\nNonlinear(sheeree)\nSaline(maxine)\nBroadside(clyde)\nSinkable(meyer)\nforall x (Samoan(x) -> Saline(x))\nforall x (Sinkable(x) -> Samoan(x))\n\nnot Samoan(clyde)\n\nforall x (Sinkable(x) -> Samoan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Gerold is hefty. Lyssa is dietetic. Alane is milch. Leontyne is scarred. All handwoven things are dietetic. All scarred things are handwoven. Leontyne is green.", "logic": "\nHefty(gerold)\nDietetic(lyssa)\nMilch(alane)\nScarred(leontyne)\nforall x (Handwoven(x) -> Dietetic(x))\nforall x (Scarred(x) -> Handwoven(x))\n\nGreen(leontyne)\n\nGreen(leontyne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Mahesh is genteel. Pollyanna is accusing. Billy is blame. Virgie is iridescent. All ruthless things are accusing. All iridescent things are ruthless. Billy is not nice.", "logic": "\nGenteel(mahesh)\nAccusing(pollyanna)\nBlame(billy)\nIridescent(virgie)\nforall x (Ruthless(x) -> Accusing(x))\nforall x (Iridescent(x) -> Ruthless(x))\n\nnot Nice(billy)\n\nnot Nice(billy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Deloria is qualified. Elfrieda is invidious. Kara is piagetian. Malka is fancy. All outspoken things are invidious. All fancy things are outspoken. Kara is fancy.", "logic": "\nQualified(deloria)\nInvidious(elfrieda)\nPiagetian(kara)\nFancy(malka)\nforall x (Outspoken(x) -> Invidious(x))\nforall x (Fancy(x) -> Outspoken(x))\n\nFancy(kara)\n\nFancy(kara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2260"} {"premises": "Dmitri is decreased. Dmitri is innoxious. Dmitri is scaly. If Dmitri is scaly and Dmitri is impelling then Dmitri is innoxious. Blue, scaly people are unaltered. If someone is decreased and impelling then they are unaltered. If someone is unaltered then they are not pert. If someone is impelling and not scaly then they are pert. If someone is scaly and not innoxious then they are decreased. Dmitri is scaly.", "logic": "\nDecreased(dmitri)\nInnoxious(dmitri)\nScaly(dmitri)\nScaly(dmitri) and Impelling(dmitri) -> Innoxious(dmitri)\nforall x (Decreased(x) and Scaly(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nforall x (Decreased(x) and Impelling(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) -> not Pert(x))\nforall x (Impelling(x) and not Scaly(x) -> Pert(x))\nforall x (Scaly(x) and not Innoxious(x) -> Decreased(x))\n\nScaly(dmitri)\n\ntherefore Scaly(dmitri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "Win is fortemente. Win is thematic. Win is untold. If Win is untold and Win is adagio then Win is thematic. Blue, untold people are chaetal. If someone is fortemente and adagio then they are chaetal. If someone is chaetal then they are not quondam. If someone is adagio and not untold then they are quondam. If someone is untold and not thematic then they are fortemente. Win is not thematic.", "logic": "\nFortemente(win)\nThematic(win)\nUntold(win)\nUntold(win) and Adagio(win) -> Thematic(win)\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Untold(x) -> Chaetal(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Adagio(x) -> Chaetal(x))\nforall x (Chaetal(x) -> not Quondam(x))\nforall x (Adagio(x) and not Untold(x) -> Quondam(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) and not Thematic(x) -> Fortemente(x))\n\nnot Thematic(win)\n\ntherefore Thematic(win)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "Nancy is excitatory. Nancy is towering. Nancy is spoilable. If Nancy is spoilable and Nancy is allophonic then Nancy is towering. Blue, spoilable people are autoerotic. If someone is excitatory and allophonic then they are autoerotic. If someone is autoerotic then they are not cobwebby. If someone is allophonic and not spoilable then they are cobwebby. If someone is spoilable and not towering then they are excitatory. Nancy is autoerotic.", "logic": "\nExcitatory(nancy)\nTowering(nancy)\nSpoilable(nancy)\nSpoilable(nancy) and Allophonic(nancy) -> Towering(nancy)\nforall x (Excitatory(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Excitatory(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> not Cobwebby(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) and not Spoilable(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) and not Towering(x) -> Excitatory(x))\n\nAutoerotic(nancy)\n\nExcitatory(nancy) and Spoilable(nancy) and forall x (Excitatory(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Autoerotic(x)) -> therefore Autoerotic(nancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "Gerhard is tight. Gerhard is doglike. Gerhard is pinched. If Gerhard is pinched and Gerhard is hittite then Gerhard is doglike. Blue, pinched people are apocarpous. If someone is tight and hittite then they are apocarpous. If someone is apocarpous then they are not human. If someone is hittite and not pinched then they are human. If someone is pinched and not doglike then they are tight. Gerhard is not apocarpous.", "logic": "\nTight(gerhard)\nDoglike(gerhard)\nPinched(gerhard)\nPinched(gerhard) and Hittite(gerhard) -> Doglike(gerhard)\nforall x (Tight(x) and Pinched(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and Hittite(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> not Human(x))\nforall x (Hittite(x) and not Pinched(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Pinched(x) and not Doglike(x) -> Tight(x))\n\nnot Apocarpous(gerhard)\n\nTight(gerhard) and Pinched(gerhard) and forall x (Tight(x) and Pinched(x) -> Apocarpous(x)) -> therefore Apocarpous(gerhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "Merv is scented. Merv is level. Merv is volcanic. If Merv is volcanic and Merv is depilatory then Merv is level. Blue, volcanic people are moravian. If someone is scented and depilatory then they are moravian. If someone is moravian then they are not unbacked. If someone is depilatory and not volcanic then they are unbacked. If someone is volcanic and not level then they are scented. Merv is not unbacked.", "logic": "\nScented(merv)\nLevel(merv)\nVolcanic(merv)\nVolcanic(merv) and Depilatory(merv) -> Level(merv)\nforall x (Scented(x) and Volcanic(x) -> Moravian(x))\nforall x (Scented(x) and Depilatory(x) -> Moravian(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> not Unbacked(x))\nforall x (Depilatory(x) and not Volcanic(x) -> Unbacked(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and not Level(x) -> Scented(x))\n\nnot Unbacked(merv)\n\nScented(merv) and Volcanic(merv) and forall x (Scented(x) and Volcanic(x) -> Moravian(x)) -> therefore Moravian(merv) Moravian(merv) and forall x (Moravian(x) -> not Unbacked(x)) -> therefore not Unbacked(merv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "Sebastien is discerning. Sebastien is brut. Sebastien is additional. If Sebastien is additional and Sebastien is untipped then Sebastien is brut. Blue, additional people are niffy. If someone is discerning and untipped then they are niffy. If someone is niffy then they are not adhesive. If someone is untipped and not additional then they are adhesive. If someone is additional and not brut then they are discerning. Sebastien is adhesive.", "logic": "\nDiscerning(sebastien)\nBrut(sebastien)\nAdditional(sebastien)\nAdditional(sebastien) and Untipped(sebastien) -> Brut(sebastien)\nforall x (Discerning(x) and Additional(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Discerning(x) and Untipped(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> not Adhesive(x))\nforall x (Untipped(x) and not Additional(x) -> Adhesive(x))\nforall x (Additional(x) and not Brut(x) -> Discerning(x))\n\nAdhesive(sebastien)\n\nDiscerning(sebastien) and Additional(sebastien) and forall x (Discerning(x) and Additional(x) -> Niffy(x)) -> therefore Niffy(sebastien) Niffy(sebastien) and forall x (Niffy(x) -> not Adhesive(x)) -> therefore not Adhesive(sebastien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "Cooper is nocturnal. Cooper is grownup. Cooper is lachrymose. If Cooper is lachrymose and Cooper is nonlexical then Cooper is grownup. Blue, lachrymose people are undreamed. If someone is nocturnal and nonlexical then they are undreamed. If someone is undreamed then they are not ripe. If someone is nonlexical and not lachrymose then they are ripe. If someone is lachrymose and not grownup then they are nocturnal. Cooper is not nonlexical.", "logic": "\nNocturnal(cooper)\nGrownup(cooper)\nLachrymose(cooper)\nLachrymose(cooper) and Nonlexical(cooper) -> Grownup(cooper)\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) and Lachrymose(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) and Nonlexical(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) -> not Ripe(x))\nforall x (Nonlexical(x) and not Lachrymose(x) -> Ripe(x))\nforall x (Lachrymose(x) and not Grownup(x) -> Nocturnal(x))\n\nnot Nonlexical(cooper)\n\nnot Nonlexical(cooper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "Doloritas is meritable. Doloritas is unsavoury. Doloritas is ironclad. If Doloritas is ironclad and Doloritas is bilobated then Doloritas is unsavoury. Blue, ironclad people are joyless. If someone is meritable and bilobated then they are joyless. If someone is joyless then they are not plaguy. If someone is bilobated and not ironclad then they are plaguy. If someone is ironclad and not unsavoury then they are meritable. Doloritas is red.", "logic": "\nMeritable(doloritas)\nUnsavoury(doloritas)\nIronclad(doloritas)\nIronclad(doloritas) and Bilobated(doloritas) -> Unsavoury(doloritas)\nforall x (Meritable(x) and Ironclad(x) -> Joyless(x))\nforall x (Meritable(x) and Bilobated(x) -> Joyless(x))\nforall x (Joyless(x) -> not Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Bilobated(x) and not Ironclad(x) -> Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) and not Unsavoury(x) -> Meritable(x))\n\nRed(doloritas)\n\nRed(doloritas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-347"} {"premises": "The tabor advantage the filmore. The filmore aerosolize the tabor. The filmore fasten the tabor. If someone fasten the tabor then they eat the tabor. If the tabor fasten the filmore and the tabor does not eat the filmore then the filmore is sardinian. If someone advantage the tabor and the tabor advantage the filmore then the tabor is not slavelike. If someone is bacchanal and they do not like the filmore then the filmore aerosolize the tabor. If someone fasten the filmore then the filmore is bonzer. If someone fasten the tabor then the tabor is bonzer. The tabor advantage the filmore.", "logic": "\nAdvantage(tabor, filmore)\nAerosolize(filmore, tabor)\nFasten(filmore, tabor)\nforall x (Fasten(x, tabor) -> Advantage(x, tabor))\nFasten(tabor, filmore) and not Advantage(tabor, filmore) -> Sardinian(filmore)\nforall x (Advantage(x, tabor) and Advantage(tabor, filmore) -> not Slavelike(tabor))\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) and not Fasten(x, filmore) -> Aerosolize(filmore, tabor))\nforall x (Fasten(x, filmore) -> Bonzer(filmore))\nforall x (Fasten(x, tabor) -> Bonzer(tabor))\n\nAdvantage(tabor, filmore)\n\ntherefore Advantage(tabor, filmore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The ilyse naturalize the brenna. The brenna melodise the ilyse. The brenna uphold the ilyse. If someone uphold the ilyse then they eat the ilyse. If the ilyse uphold the brenna and the ilyse does not eat the brenna then the brenna is interim. If someone naturalize the ilyse and the ilyse naturalize the brenna then the ilyse is not stated. If someone is mitigatory and they do not like the brenna then the brenna melodise the ilyse. If someone uphold the brenna then the brenna is insolvent. If someone uphold the ilyse then the ilyse is insolvent. The brenna does not chase the ilyse.", "logic": "\nNaturalize(ilyse, brenna)\nMelodise(brenna, ilyse)\nUphold(brenna, ilyse)\nforall x (Uphold(x, ilyse) -> Naturalize(x, ilyse))\nUphold(ilyse, brenna) and not Naturalize(ilyse, brenna) -> Interim(brenna)\nforall x (Naturalize(x, ilyse) and Naturalize(ilyse, brenna) -> not Stated(ilyse))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and not Uphold(x, brenna) -> Melodise(brenna, ilyse))\nforall x (Uphold(x, brenna) -> Insolvent(brenna))\nforall x (Uphold(x, ilyse) -> Insolvent(ilyse))\n\nnot Melodise(brenna, ilyse)\n\ntherefore Melodise(brenna, ilyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The job eyeball the von. The von rejuvenate the job. The von elect the job. If someone elect the job then they eat the job. If the job elect the von and the job does not eat the von then the von is ringed. If someone eyeball the job and the job eyeball the von then the job is not surficial. If someone is uneconomic and they do not like the von then the von rejuvenate the job. If someone elect the von then the von is ostensible. If someone elect the job then the job is ostensible. The von eyeball the job.", "logic": "\nEyeball(job, von)\nRejuvenate(von, job)\nElect(von, job)\nforall x (Elect(x, job) -> Eyeball(x, job))\nElect(job, von) and not Eyeball(job, von) -> Ringed(von)\nforall x (Eyeball(x, job) and Eyeball(job, von) -> not Surficial(job))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) and not Elect(x, von) -> Rejuvenate(von, job))\nforall x (Elect(x, von) -> Ostensible(von))\nforall x (Elect(x, job) -> Ostensible(job))\n\nEyeball(von, job)\n\nElect(von, job) and forall x (Elect(x, job) -> Eyeball(x, job)) -> therefore Eyeball(von, job)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The benjy exult the freida. The freida skirt the benjy. The freida offer the benjy. If someone offer the benjy then they eat the benjy. If the benjy offer the freida and the benjy does not eat the freida then the freida is shopsoiled. If someone exult the benjy and the benjy exult the freida then the benjy is not embonpoint. If someone is corked and they do not like the freida then the freida skirt the benjy. If someone offer the freida then the freida is pigheaded. If someone offer the benjy then the benjy is pigheaded. The freida does not eat the benjy.", "logic": "\nExult(benjy, freida)\nSkirt(freida, benjy)\nOffer(freida, benjy)\nforall x (Offer(x, benjy) -> Exult(x, benjy))\nOffer(benjy, freida) and not Exult(benjy, freida) -> Shopsoiled(freida)\nforall x (Exult(x, benjy) and Exult(benjy, freida) -> not Embonpoint(benjy))\nforall x (Corked(x) and not Offer(x, freida) -> Skirt(freida, benjy))\nforall x (Offer(x, freida) -> Pigheaded(freida))\nforall x (Offer(x, benjy) -> Pigheaded(benjy))\n\nnot Exult(freida, benjy)\n\nOffer(freida, benjy) and forall x (Offer(x, benjy) -> Exult(x, benjy)) -> therefore Exult(freida, benjy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The gabriela muster the bamby. The bamby waterproof the gabriela. The bamby sustain the gabriela. If someone sustain the gabriela then they eat the gabriela. If the gabriela sustain the bamby and the gabriela does not eat the bamby then the bamby is urbanized. If someone muster the gabriela and the gabriela muster the bamby then the gabriela is not carolean. If someone is fibrinous and they do not like the bamby then the bamby waterproof the gabriela. If someone sustain the bamby then the bamby is sottish. If someone sustain the gabriela then the gabriela is sottish. The gabriela is not carolean.", "logic": "\nMuster(gabriela, bamby)\nWaterproof(bamby, gabriela)\nSustain(bamby, gabriela)\nforall x (Sustain(x, gabriela) -> Muster(x, gabriela))\nSustain(gabriela, bamby) and not Muster(gabriela, bamby) -> Urbanized(bamby)\nforall x (Muster(x, gabriela) and Muster(gabriela, bamby) -> not Carolean(gabriela))\nforall x (Fibrinous(x) and not Sustain(x, bamby) -> Waterproof(bamby, gabriela))\nforall x (Sustain(x, bamby) -> Sottish(bamby))\nforall x (Sustain(x, gabriela) -> Sottish(gabriela))\n\nnot Carolean(gabriela)\n\nSustain(bamby, gabriela) and forall x (Sustain(x, gabriela) -> Muster(x, gabriela)) -> therefore Muster(bamby, gabriela) Muster(bamby, gabriela) and Muster(gabriela, bamby) and forall x (Muster(x, gabriela) and Muster(gabriela, bamby) -> not Carolean(gabriela)) -> therefore not Carolean(gabriela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The lauretta prosper the verge. The verge fashion the lauretta. The verge blether the lauretta. If someone blether the lauretta then they eat the lauretta. If the lauretta blether the verge and the lauretta does not eat the verge then the verge is lupine. If someone prosper the lauretta and the lauretta prosper the verge then the lauretta is not dignifying. If someone is dreamy and they do not like the verge then the verge fashion the lauretta. If someone blether the verge then the verge is fibreoptic. If someone blether the lauretta then the lauretta is fibreoptic. The lauretta is dignifying.", "logic": "\nProsper(lauretta, verge)\nFashion(verge, lauretta)\nBlether(verge, lauretta)\nforall x (Blether(x, lauretta) -> Prosper(x, lauretta))\nBlether(lauretta, verge) and not Prosper(lauretta, verge) -> Lupine(verge)\nforall x (Prosper(x, lauretta) and Prosper(lauretta, verge) -> not Dignifying(lauretta))\nforall x (Dreamy(x) and not Blether(x, verge) -> Fashion(verge, lauretta))\nforall x (Blether(x, verge) -> Fibreoptic(verge))\nforall x (Blether(x, lauretta) -> Fibreoptic(lauretta))\n\nDignifying(lauretta)\n\nBlether(verge, lauretta) and forall x (Blether(x, lauretta) -> Prosper(x, lauretta)) -> therefore Prosper(verge, lauretta) Prosper(verge, lauretta) and Prosper(lauretta, verge) and forall x (Prosper(x, lauretta) and Prosper(lauretta, verge) -> not Dignifying(lauretta)) -> therefore not Dignifying(lauretta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The austine factor the kirstie. The kirstie bombilate the austine. The kirstie riffle the austine. If someone riffle the austine then they eat the austine. If the austine riffle the kirstie and the austine does not eat the kirstie then the kirstie is simplex. If someone factor the austine and the austine factor the kirstie then the austine is not accidental. If someone is nonviolent and they do not like the kirstie then the kirstie bombilate the austine. If someone riffle the kirstie then the kirstie is satyric. If someone riffle the austine then the austine is satyric. The austine does not eat the austine.", "logic": "\nFactor(austine, kirstie)\nBombilate(kirstie, austine)\nRiffle(kirstie, austine)\nforall x (Riffle(x, austine) -> Factor(x, austine))\nRiffle(austine, kirstie) and not Factor(austine, kirstie) -> Simplex(kirstie)\nforall x (Factor(x, austine) and Factor(austine, kirstie) -> not Accidental(austine))\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) and not Riffle(x, kirstie) -> Bombilate(kirstie, austine))\nforall x (Riffle(x, kirstie) -> Satyric(kirstie))\nforall x (Riffle(x, austine) -> Satyric(austine))\n\nnot Factor(austine, austine)\n\nforall x (Riffle(x, austine) -> Factor(x, austine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The nixie augur the leah. The leah blueprint the nixie. The leah retort the nixie. If someone retort the nixie then they eat the nixie. If the nixie retort the leah and the nixie does not eat the leah then the leah is baked. If someone augur the nixie and the nixie augur the leah then the nixie is not unroofed. If someone is unsanded and they do not like the leah then the leah blueprint the nixie. If someone retort the leah then the leah is thermoset. If someone retort the nixie then the nixie is thermoset. The leah is thermoset.", "logic": "\nAugur(nixie, leah)\nBlueprint(leah, nixie)\nRetort(leah, nixie)\nforall x (Retort(x, nixie) -> Augur(x, nixie))\nRetort(nixie, leah) and not Augur(nixie, leah) -> Baked(leah)\nforall x (Augur(x, nixie) and Augur(nixie, leah) -> not Unroofed(nixie))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) and not Retort(x, leah) -> Blueprint(leah, nixie))\nforall x (Retort(x, leah) -> Thermoset(leah))\nforall x (Retort(x, nixie) -> Thermoset(nixie))\n\nThermoset(leah)\n\nforall x (Retort(x, leah) -> Thermoset(leah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The shela nictitate the virgilio. The virgilio carbonize the shela. The virgilio rummage the shela. If someone rummage the shela then they eat the shela. If the shela rummage the virgilio and the shela does not eat the virgilio then the virgilio is acned. If someone nictitate the shela and the shela nictitate the virgilio then the shela is not polluted. If someone is amidship and they do not like the virgilio then the virgilio carbonize the shela. If someone rummage the virgilio then the virgilio is vitrified. If someone rummage the shela then the shela is vitrified. The virgilio is not acned.", "logic": "\nNictitate(shela, virgilio)\nCarbonize(virgilio, shela)\nRummage(virgilio, shela)\nforall x (Rummage(x, shela) -> Nictitate(x, shela))\nRummage(shela, virgilio) and not Nictitate(shela, virgilio) -> Acned(virgilio)\nforall x (Nictitate(x, shela) and Nictitate(shela, virgilio) -> not Polluted(shela))\nforall x (Amidship(x) and not Rummage(x, virgilio) -> Carbonize(virgilio, shela))\nforall x (Rummage(x, virgilio) -> Vitrified(virgilio))\nforall x (Rummage(x, shela) -> Vitrified(shela))\n\nnot Acned(virgilio)\n\nRummage(shela, virgilio) and not Nictitate(shela, virgilio) -> Acned(virgilio) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The pauletta optimise the lucretia. The lucretia confection the pauletta. The lucretia chaperone the pauletta. If someone chaperone the pauletta then they eat the pauletta. If the pauletta chaperone the lucretia and the pauletta does not eat the lucretia then the lucretia is preceding. If someone optimise the pauletta and the pauletta optimise the lucretia then the pauletta is not looking. If someone is commanding and they do not like the lucretia then the lucretia confection the pauletta. If someone chaperone the lucretia then the lucretia is petalless. If someone chaperone the pauletta then the pauletta is petalless. The lucretia confection the lucretia.", "logic": "\nOptimise(pauletta, lucretia)\nConfection(lucretia, pauletta)\nChaperone(lucretia, pauletta)\nforall x (Chaperone(x, pauletta) -> Optimise(x, pauletta))\nChaperone(pauletta, lucretia) and not Optimise(pauletta, lucretia) -> Preceding(lucretia)\nforall x (Optimise(x, pauletta) and Optimise(pauletta, lucretia) -> not Looking(pauletta))\nforall x (Commanding(x) and not Chaperone(x, lucretia) -> Confection(lucretia, pauletta))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, lucretia) -> Petalless(lucretia))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, pauletta) -> Petalless(pauletta))\n\nConfection(lucretia, lucretia)\n\nConfection(lucretia, lucretia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The spike misgovern the kali. The kali disfavor the spike. The kali review the spike. If someone review the spike then they eat the spike. If the spike review the kali and the spike does not eat the kali then the kali is mutable. If someone misgovern the spike and the spike misgovern the kali then the spike is not antsy. If someone is nullified and they do not like the kali then the kali disfavor the spike. If someone review the kali then the kali is expected. If someone review the spike then the spike is expected. The kali is not nice.", "logic": "\nMisgovern(spike, kali)\nDisfavor(kali, spike)\nReview(kali, spike)\nforall x (Review(x, spike) -> Misgovern(x, spike))\nReview(spike, kali) and not Misgovern(spike, kali) -> Mutable(kali)\nforall x (Misgovern(x, spike) and Misgovern(spike, kali) -> not Antsy(spike))\nforall x (Nullified(x) and not Review(x, kali) -> Disfavor(kali, spike))\nforall x (Review(x, kali) -> Expected(kali))\nforall x (Review(x, spike) -> Expected(spike))\n\nnot Nice(kali)\n\nnot Nice(kali) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "The eveline combine the tobey. The tobey crenelate the eveline. The tobey envy the eveline. If someone envy the eveline then they eat the eveline. If the eveline envy the tobey and the eveline does not eat the tobey then the tobey is scopal. If someone combine the eveline and the eveline combine the tobey then the eveline is not accoutered. If someone is unethical and they do not like the tobey then the tobey crenelate the eveline. If someone envy the tobey then the tobey is adoring. If someone envy the eveline then the eveline is adoring. The eveline is unethical.", "logic": "\nCombine(eveline, tobey)\nCrenelate(tobey, eveline)\nEnvy(tobey, eveline)\nforall x (Envy(x, eveline) -> Combine(x, eveline))\nEnvy(eveline, tobey) and not Combine(eveline, tobey) -> Scopal(tobey)\nforall x (Combine(x, eveline) and Combine(eveline, tobey) -> not Accoutered(eveline))\nforall x (Unethical(x) and not Envy(x, tobey) -> Crenelate(tobey, eveline))\nforall x (Envy(x, tobey) -> Adoring(tobey))\nforall x (Envy(x, eveline) -> Adoring(eveline))\n\nUnethical(eveline)\n\nUnethical(eveline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1421"} {"premises": "Winni is suspected. Winni is not akin. Winni is pizzicato. Adolfo is akin. Adolfo is not australian. Dominick is suspected. Dominick is australian. Dominick is cheap. Dominick is ornamental. Dominick is not pizzicato. If something is australian then it is suspected. White things are pizzicato. Nice things are akin. White things are cheap. If Adolfo is akin then Adolfo is aleuronic. If something is akin and not cheap then it is ornamental. Dominick is suspected.", "logic": "\nSuspected(winni)\nnot Akin(winni)\nPizzicato(winni)\nAkin(adolfo)\nnot Australian(adolfo)\nSuspected(dominick)\nAustralian(dominick)\nCheap(dominick)\nOrnamental(dominick)\nnot Pizzicato(dominick)\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Suspected(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) -> Pizzicato(x))\nforall x (Cheap(x) -> Akin(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) -> Cheap(x))\nAkin(adolfo) -> Aleuronic(adolfo)\nforall x (Akin(x) and not Cheap(x) -> Ornamental(x))\n\nSuspected(dominick)\n\ntherefore Suspected(dominick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Hillary is tiptop. Hillary is not unheard. Hillary is convulsive. Antoine is unheard. Antoine is not beaten. Oren is tiptop. Oren is beaten. Oren is lancelike. Oren is stormbound. Oren is not convulsive. If something is beaten then it is tiptop. White things are convulsive. Nice things are unheard. White things are lancelike. If Antoine is unheard then Antoine is assigned. If something is unheard and not lancelike then it is stormbound. Oren is not lancelike.", "logic": "\nTiptop(hillary)\nnot Unheard(hillary)\nConvulsive(hillary)\nUnheard(antoine)\nnot Beaten(antoine)\nTiptop(oren)\nBeaten(oren)\nLancelike(oren)\nStormbound(oren)\nnot Convulsive(oren)\nforall x (Beaten(x) -> Tiptop(x))\nforall x (Assigned(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nforall x (Lancelike(x) -> Unheard(x))\nforall x (Assigned(x) -> Lancelike(x))\nUnheard(antoine) -> Assigned(antoine)\nforall x (Unheard(x) and not Lancelike(x) -> Stormbound(x))\n\nnot Lancelike(oren)\n\ntherefore Lancelike(oren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Ofelia is besprent. Ofelia is not oceanic. Ofelia is baric. Jeffery is oceanic. Jeffery is not polyvalent. Cary is besprent. Cary is polyvalent. Cary is homeward. Cary is duteous. Cary is not baric. If something is polyvalent then it is besprent. White things are baric. Nice things are oceanic. White things are homeward. If Jeffery is oceanic then Jeffery is verbalized. If something is oceanic and not homeward then it is duteous. Jeffery is verbalized.", "logic": "\nBesprent(ofelia)\nnot Oceanic(ofelia)\nBaric(ofelia)\nOceanic(jeffery)\nnot Polyvalent(jeffery)\nBesprent(cary)\nPolyvalent(cary)\nHomeward(cary)\nDuteous(cary)\nnot Baric(cary)\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Besprent(x))\nforall x (Verbalized(x) -> Baric(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Oceanic(x))\nforall x (Verbalized(x) -> Homeward(x))\nOceanic(jeffery) -> Verbalized(jeffery)\nforall x (Oceanic(x) and not Homeward(x) -> Duteous(x))\n\nVerbalized(jeffery)\n\nOceanic(jeffery) and Oceanic(jeffery) -> Verbalized(jeffery) -> therefore Verbalized(jeffery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Deedee is cervical. Deedee is not needless. Deedee is precocious. Gifford is needless. Gifford is not weighted. Jemmy is cervical. Jemmy is weighted. Jemmy is acellular. Jemmy is embolic. Jemmy is not precocious. If something is weighted then it is cervical. White things are precocious. Nice things are needless. White things are acellular. If Gifford is needless then Gifford is windburned. If something is needless and not acellular then it is embolic. Gifford is not windburned.", "logic": "\nCervical(deedee)\nnot Needless(deedee)\nPrecocious(deedee)\nNeedless(gifford)\nnot Weighted(gifford)\nCervical(jemmy)\nWeighted(jemmy)\nAcellular(jemmy)\nEmbolic(jemmy)\nnot Precocious(jemmy)\nforall x (Weighted(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Windburned(x) -> Precocious(x))\nforall x (Acellular(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Windburned(x) -> Acellular(x))\nNeedless(gifford) -> Windburned(gifford)\nforall x (Needless(x) and not Acellular(x) -> Embolic(x))\n\nnot Windburned(gifford)\n\nNeedless(gifford) and Needless(gifford) -> Windburned(gifford) -> therefore Windburned(gifford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Suellen is bursal. Suellen is not winning. Suellen is phonemic. Ede is winning. Ede is not solid. Monique is bursal. Monique is solid. Monique is lavish. Monique is starlit. Monique is not phonemic. If something is solid then it is bursal. White things are phonemic. Nice things are winning. White things are lavish. If Ede is winning then Ede is deskbound. If something is winning and not lavish then it is starlit. Ede is phonemic.", "logic": "\nBursal(suellen)\nnot Winning(suellen)\nPhonemic(suellen)\nWinning(ede)\nnot Solid(ede)\nBursal(monique)\nSolid(monique)\nLavish(monique)\nStarlit(monique)\nnot Phonemic(monique)\nforall x (Solid(x) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Deskbound(x) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x) -> Winning(x))\nforall x (Deskbound(x) -> Lavish(x))\nWinning(ede) -> Deskbound(ede)\nforall x (Winning(x) and not Lavish(x) -> Starlit(x))\n\nPhonemic(ede)\n\nWinning(ede) and Winning(ede) -> Deskbound(ede) -> therefore Deskbound(ede) Deskbound(ede) and forall x (Deskbound(x) -> Phonemic(x)) -> therefore Phonemic(ede)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Stephi is delusional. Stephi is not rallying. Stephi is fibrillose. Blanca is rallying. Blanca is not prima. Reuven is delusional. Reuven is prima. Reuven is loving. Reuven is fivefold. Reuven is not fibrillose. If something is prima then it is delusional. White things are fibrillose. Nice things are rallying. White things are loving. If Blanca is rallying then Blanca is unlifelike. If something is rallying and not loving then it is fivefold. Blanca is not loving.", "logic": "\nDelusional(stephi)\nnot Rallying(stephi)\nFibrillose(stephi)\nRallying(blanca)\nnot Prima(blanca)\nDelusional(reuven)\nPrima(reuven)\nLoving(reuven)\nFivefold(reuven)\nnot Fibrillose(reuven)\nforall x (Prima(x) -> Delusional(x))\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Loving(x) -> Rallying(x))\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) -> Loving(x))\nRallying(blanca) -> Unlifelike(blanca)\nforall x (Rallying(x) and not Loving(x) -> Fivefold(x))\n\nnot Loving(blanca)\n\nRallying(blanca) and Rallying(blanca) -> Unlifelike(blanca) -> therefore Unlifelike(blanca) Unlifelike(blanca) and forall x (Unlifelike(x) -> Loving(x)) -> therefore Loving(blanca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Nike is gustative. Nike is not sorrowing. Nike is arboreous. Gabrielle is sorrowing. Gabrielle is not intragroup. Janelle is gustative. Janelle is intragroup. Janelle is ersatz. Janelle is referenced. Janelle is not arboreous. If something is intragroup then it is gustative. White things are arboreous. Nice things are sorrowing. White things are ersatz. If Gabrielle is sorrowing then Gabrielle is homologous. If something is sorrowing and not ersatz then it is referenced. Gabrielle is not referenced.", "logic": "\nGustative(nike)\nnot Sorrowing(nike)\nArboreous(nike)\nSorrowing(gabrielle)\nnot Intragroup(gabrielle)\nGustative(janelle)\nIntragroup(janelle)\nErsatz(janelle)\nReferenced(janelle)\nnot Arboreous(janelle)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) -> Gustative(x))\nforall x (Homologous(x) -> Arboreous(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\nforall x (Homologous(x) -> Ersatz(x))\nSorrowing(gabrielle) -> Homologous(gabrielle)\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) and not Ersatz(x) -> Referenced(x))\n\nnot Referenced(gabrielle)\n\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) and not Ersatz(x) -> Referenced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Carrol is unavailing. Carrol is not dynastic. Carrol is biggish. Joni is dynastic. Joni is not monestrous. Loise is unavailing. Loise is monestrous. Loise is thoriated. Loise is stomatous. Loise is not biggish. If something is monestrous then it is unavailing. White things are biggish. Nice things are dynastic. White things are thoriated. If Joni is dynastic then Joni is acyclic. If something is dynastic and not thoriated then it is stomatous. Carrol is stomatous.", "logic": "\nUnavailing(carrol)\nnot Dynastic(carrol)\nBiggish(carrol)\nDynastic(joni)\nnot Monestrous(joni)\nUnavailing(loise)\nMonestrous(loise)\nThoriated(loise)\nStomatous(loise)\nnot Biggish(loise)\nforall x (Monestrous(x) -> Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Thoriated(x) -> Dynastic(x))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nDynastic(joni) -> Acyclic(joni)\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and not Thoriated(x) -> Stomatous(x))\n\nStomatous(carrol)\n\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and not Thoriated(x) -> Stomatous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Corri is acrogenous. Corri is not yummy. Corri is dehydrated. Adina is yummy. Adina is not boorish. Allis is acrogenous. Allis is boorish. Allis is working. Allis is unwavering. Allis is not dehydrated. If something is boorish then it is acrogenous. White things are dehydrated. Nice things are yummy. White things are working. If Adina is yummy then Adina is usual. If something is yummy and not working then it is unwavering. Adina is not acrogenous.", "logic": "\nAcrogenous(corri)\nnot Yummy(corri)\nDehydrated(corri)\nYummy(adina)\nnot Boorish(adina)\nAcrogenous(allis)\nBoorish(allis)\nWorking(allis)\nUnwavering(allis)\nnot Dehydrated(allis)\nforall x (Boorish(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nforall x (Usual(x) -> Dehydrated(x))\nforall x (Working(x) -> Yummy(x))\nforall x (Usual(x) -> Working(x))\nYummy(adina) -> Usual(adina)\nforall x (Yummy(x) and not Working(x) -> Unwavering(x))\n\nnot Acrogenous(adina)\n\nforall x (Boorish(x) -> Acrogenous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Sally is overeager. Sally is not driven. Sally is decided. Frederich is driven. Frederich is not duple. Austin is overeager. Austin is duple. Austin is teal. Austin is palish. Austin is not decided. If something is duple then it is overeager. White things are decided. Nice things are driven. White things are teal. If Frederich is driven then Frederich is professed. If something is driven and not teal then it is palish. Sally is professed.", "logic": "\nOvereager(sally)\nnot Driven(sally)\nDecided(sally)\nDriven(frederich)\nnot Duple(frederich)\nOvereager(austin)\nDuple(austin)\nTeal(austin)\nPalish(austin)\nnot Decided(austin)\nforall x (Duple(x) -> Overeager(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) -> Decided(x))\nforall x (Teal(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) -> Teal(x))\nDriven(frederich) -> Professed(frederich)\nforall x (Driven(x) and not Teal(x) -> Palish(x))\n\nProfessed(sally)\n\nProfessed(sally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Reece is afoot. Reece is not embryotic. Reece is sobering. Shirline is embryotic. Shirline is not listed. Lyndsay is afoot. Lyndsay is listed. Lyndsay is monoatomic. Lyndsay is clawlike. Lyndsay is not sobering. If something is listed then it is afoot. White things are sobering. Nice things are embryotic. White things are monoatomic. If Shirline is embryotic then Shirline is fluid. If something is embryotic and not monoatomic then it is clawlike. Lyndsay is not fluid.", "logic": "\nAfoot(reece)\nnot Embryotic(reece)\nSobering(reece)\nEmbryotic(shirline)\nnot Listed(shirline)\nAfoot(lyndsay)\nListed(lyndsay)\nMonoatomic(lyndsay)\nClawlike(lyndsay)\nnot Sobering(lyndsay)\nforall x (Listed(x) -> Afoot(x))\nforall x (Fluid(x) -> Sobering(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Fluid(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nEmbryotic(shirline) -> Fluid(shirline)\nforall x (Embryotic(x) and not Monoatomic(x) -> Clawlike(x))\n\nnot Fluid(lyndsay)\n\nnot Fluid(lyndsay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "Ortensia is newborn. Ortensia is not squeamish. Ortensia is messy. Rosalinda is squeamish. Rosalinda is not euphoric. Josef is newborn. Josef is euphoric. Josef is ternary. Josef is ignored. Josef is not messy. If something is euphoric then it is newborn. White things are messy. Nice things are squeamish. White things are ternary. If Rosalinda is squeamish then Rosalinda is parturient. If something is squeamish and not ternary then it is ignored. Ortensia is euphoric.", "logic": "\nNewborn(ortensia)\nnot Squeamish(ortensia)\nMessy(ortensia)\nSqueamish(rosalinda)\nnot Euphoric(rosalinda)\nNewborn(josef)\nEuphoric(josef)\nTernary(josef)\nIgnored(josef)\nnot Messy(josef)\nforall x (Euphoric(x) -> Newborn(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Messy(x))\nforall x (Ternary(x) -> Squeamish(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Ternary(x))\nSqueamish(rosalinda) -> Parturient(rosalinda)\nforall x (Squeamish(x) and not Ternary(x) -> Ignored(x))\n\nEuphoric(ortensia)\n\nEuphoric(ortensia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-987"} {"premises": "The nathanial fruit the raphaela. The nathanial is alterable. The nathanial does not need the margalo. The emile dissatisfy the margalo. The raphaela dissatisfy the margalo. The margalo dissatisfy the nathanial. The margalo is fragrant. If someone fruit the raphaela then the raphaela modulate the emile. If someone modulate the emile then the emile fruit the raphaela. The nathanial fruit the raphaela.", "logic": "\nFruit(nathanial, raphaela)\nAlterable(nathanial)\nnot Modulate(nathanial, margalo)\nDissatisfy(emile, margalo)\nDissatisfy(raphaela, margalo)\nDissatisfy(margalo, nathanial)\nFragrant(margalo)\nforall x (Fruit(x, raphaela) -> Modulate(raphaela, emile))\nforall x (Modulate(x, emile) -> Fruit(emile, raphaela))\n\nFruit(nathanial, raphaela)\n\ntherefore Fruit(nathanial, raphaela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The glynn extract the simmonds. The glynn is orbital. The glynn does not need the eugene. The barty tabularize the eugene. The simmonds tabularize the eugene. The eugene tabularize the glynn. The eugene is saharan. If someone extract the simmonds then the simmonds geyser the barty. If someone geyser the barty then the barty extract the simmonds. The glynn does not eat the simmonds.", "logic": "\nExtract(glynn, simmonds)\nOrbital(glynn)\nnot Geyser(glynn, eugene)\nTabularize(barty, eugene)\nTabularize(simmonds, eugene)\nTabularize(eugene, glynn)\nSaharan(eugene)\nforall x (Extract(x, simmonds) -> Geyser(simmonds, barty))\nforall x (Geyser(x, barty) -> Extract(barty, simmonds))\n\nnot Extract(glynn, simmonds)\n\ntherefore Extract(glynn, simmonds)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The renell wamble the stephie. The renell is topnotch. The renell does not need the elisabet. The brandea sever the elisabet. The stephie sever the elisabet. The elisabet sever the renell. The elisabet is largish. If someone wamble the stephie then the stephie cure the brandea. If someone cure the brandea then the brandea wamble the stephie. The stephie cure the brandea.", "logic": "\nWamble(renell, stephie)\nTopnotch(renell)\nnot Cure(renell, elisabet)\nSever(brandea, elisabet)\nSever(stephie, elisabet)\nSever(elisabet, renell)\nLargish(elisabet)\nforall x (Wamble(x, stephie) -> Cure(stephie, brandea))\nforall x (Cure(x, brandea) -> Wamble(brandea, stephie))\n\nCure(stephie, brandea)\n\nWamble(renell, stephie) and forall x (Wamble(x, stephie) -> Cure(stephie, brandea)) -> therefore Cure(stephie, brandea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The mozelle graduate the janette. The mozelle is impatient. The mozelle does not need the tedda. The cacilia exhilarate the tedda. The janette exhilarate the tedda. The tedda exhilarate the mozelle. The tedda is cephalic. If someone graduate the janette then the janette provide the cacilia. If someone provide the cacilia then the cacilia graduate the janette. The janette does not need the cacilia.", "logic": "\nGraduate(mozelle, janette)\nImpatient(mozelle)\nnot Provide(mozelle, tedda)\nExhilarate(cacilia, tedda)\nExhilarate(janette, tedda)\nExhilarate(tedda, mozelle)\nCephalic(tedda)\nforall x (Graduate(x, janette) -> Provide(janette, cacilia))\nforall x (Provide(x, cacilia) -> Graduate(cacilia, janette))\n\nnot Provide(janette, cacilia)\n\nGraduate(mozelle, janette) and forall x (Graduate(x, janette) -> Provide(janette, cacilia)) -> therefore Provide(janette, cacilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The ingelbert grimace the ketti. The ingelbert is paternal. The ingelbert does not need the amity. The gaven pettifog the amity. The ketti pettifog the amity. The amity pettifog the ingelbert. The amity is handmade. If someone grimace the ketti then the ketti subjoin the gaven. If someone subjoin the gaven then the gaven grimace the ketti. The gaven grimace the ketti.", "logic": "\nGrimace(ingelbert, ketti)\nPaternal(ingelbert)\nnot Subjoin(ingelbert, amity)\nPettifog(gaven, amity)\nPettifog(ketti, amity)\nPettifog(amity, ingelbert)\nHandmade(amity)\nforall x (Grimace(x, ketti) -> Subjoin(ketti, gaven))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, gaven) -> Grimace(gaven, ketti))\n\nGrimace(gaven, ketti)\n\nGrimace(ingelbert, ketti) and forall x (Grimace(x, ketti) -> Subjoin(ketti, gaven)) -> therefore Subjoin(ketti, gaven) Subjoin(ketti, gaven) and forall x (Subjoin(x, gaven) -> Grimace(gaven, ketti)) -> therefore Grimace(gaven, ketti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The ariadne motivate the faye. The ariadne is repugnant. The ariadne does not need the jolyn. The dian glass the jolyn. The faye glass the jolyn. The jolyn glass the ariadne. The jolyn is regardful. If someone motivate the faye then the faye bewray the dian. If someone bewray the dian then the dian motivate the faye. The dian does not eat the faye.", "logic": "\nMotivate(ariadne, faye)\nRepugnant(ariadne)\nnot Bewray(ariadne, jolyn)\nGlass(dian, jolyn)\nGlass(faye, jolyn)\nGlass(jolyn, ariadne)\nRegardful(jolyn)\nforall x (Motivate(x, faye) -> Bewray(faye, dian))\nforall x (Bewray(x, dian) -> Motivate(dian, faye))\n\nnot Motivate(dian, faye)\n\nMotivate(ariadne, faye) and forall x (Motivate(x, faye) -> Bewray(faye, dian)) -> therefore Bewray(faye, dian) Bewray(faye, dian) and forall x (Bewray(x, dian) -> Motivate(dian, faye)) -> therefore Motivate(dian, faye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The pinchas tram the galen. The pinchas is succulent. The pinchas does not need the milt. The joceline effloresce the milt. The galen effloresce the milt. The milt effloresce the pinchas. The milt is irritative. If someone tram the galen then the galen flounce the joceline. If someone flounce the joceline then the joceline tram the galen. The pinchas does not chase the galen.", "logic": "\nTram(pinchas, galen)\nSucculent(pinchas)\nnot Flounce(pinchas, milt)\nEffloresce(joceline, milt)\nEffloresce(galen, milt)\nEffloresce(milt, pinchas)\nIrritative(milt)\nforall x (Tram(x, galen) -> Flounce(galen, joceline))\nforall x (Flounce(x, joceline) -> Tram(joceline, galen))\n\nnot Effloresce(pinchas, galen)\n\nnot Effloresce(pinchas, galen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The mitzi whap the marena. The mitzi is color. The mitzi does not need the tatiania. The didi symbolize the tatiania. The marena symbolize the tatiania. The tatiania symbolize the mitzi. The tatiania is bilobate. If someone whap the marena then the marena market the didi. If someone market the didi then the didi whap the marena. The didi is kind.", "logic": "\nWhap(mitzi, marena)\nColor(mitzi)\nnot Market(mitzi, tatiania)\nSymbolize(didi, tatiania)\nSymbolize(marena, tatiania)\nSymbolize(tatiania, mitzi)\nBilobate(tatiania)\nforall x (Whap(x, marena) -> Market(marena, didi))\nforall x (Market(x, didi) -> Whap(didi, marena))\n\nKind(didi)\n\nKind(didi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The istvan tighten the danni. The istvan is motile. The istvan does not need the tedda. The brynne molest the tedda. The danni molest the tedda. The tedda molest the istvan. The tedda is phrenic. If someone tighten the danni then the danni hanker the brynne. If someone hanker the brynne then the brynne tighten the danni. The istvan does not need the brynne.", "logic": "\nTighten(istvan, danni)\nMotile(istvan)\nnot Hanker(istvan, tedda)\nMolest(brynne, tedda)\nMolest(danni, tedda)\nMolest(tedda, istvan)\nPhrenic(tedda)\nforall x (Tighten(x, danni) -> Hanker(danni, brynne))\nforall x (Hanker(x, brynne) -> Tighten(brynne, danni))\n\nnot Hanker(istvan, brynne)\n\nnot Hanker(istvan, brynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The priscella beetle the thad. The priscella is cryptical. The priscella does not need the ruby. The scarlet polychrome the ruby. The thad polychrome the ruby. The ruby polychrome the priscella. The ruby is vagile. If someone beetle the thad then the thad teach the scarlet. If someone teach the scarlet then the scarlet beetle the thad. The thad is nice.", "logic": "\nBeetle(priscella, thad)\nCryptical(priscella)\nnot Teach(priscella, ruby)\nPolychrome(scarlet, ruby)\nPolychrome(thad, ruby)\nPolychrome(ruby, priscella)\nVagile(ruby)\nforall x (Beetle(x, thad) -> Teach(thad, scarlet))\nforall x (Teach(x, scarlet) -> Beetle(scarlet, thad))\n\nNice(thad)\n\nNice(thad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The doretta deafen the titus. The doretta is panegyric. The doretta does not need the mariska. The katerine snack the mariska. The titus snack the mariska. The mariska snack the doretta. The mariska is separate. If someone deafen the titus then the titus surfboard the katerine. If someone surfboard the katerine then the katerine deafen the titus. The doretta does not need the doretta.", "logic": "\nDeafen(doretta, titus)\nPanegyric(doretta)\nnot Surfboard(doretta, mariska)\nSnack(katerine, mariska)\nSnack(titus, mariska)\nSnack(mariska, doretta)\nSeparate(mariska)\nforall x (Deafen(x, titus) -> Surfboard(titus, katerine))\nforall x (Surfboard(x, katerine) -> Deafen(katerine, titus))\n\nnot Surfboard(doretta, doretta)\n\nnot Surfboard(doretta, doretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "The elaina sightsee the cari. The elaina is coreferent. The elaina does not need the madlen. The gilligan clock the madlen. The cari clock the madlen. The madlen clock the elaina. The madlen is utilized. If someone sightsee the cari then the cari intimidate the gilligan. If someone intimidate the gilligan then the gilligan sightsee the cari. The gilligan is coreferent.", "logic": "\nSightsee(elaina, cari)\nCoreferent(elaina)\nnot Intimidate(elaina, madlen)\nClock(gilligan, madlen)\nClock(cari, madlen)\nClock(madlen, elaina)\nUtilized(madlen)\nforall x (Sightsee(x, cari) -> Intimidate(cari, gilligan))\nforall x (Intimidate(x, gilligan) -> Sightsee(gilligan, cari))\n\nCoreferent(gilligan)\n\nCoreferent(gilligan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1917"} {"premises": "Kris is commodious. Willyt is uncoerced. Noami is libertine. Furry people are uncoerced. If Willyt is libertine and Willyt is commodious then Willyt is blocky. All uncoerced people are blocky. Noami is libertine.", "logic": "\nCommodious(kris)\nUncoerced(willyt)\nLibertine(noami)\nforall x (Libertine(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nLibertine(willyt) and Commodious(willyt) -> Blocky(willyt)\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Blocky(x))\n\nLibertine(noami)\n\ntherefore Libertine(noami)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Mindy is seedless. Margaret is mongol. Sheree is bewitching. Furry people are mongol. If Margaret is bewitching and Margaret is seedless then Margaret is overbusy. All mongol people are overbusy. Mindy is not seedless.", "logic": "\nSeedless(mindy)\nMongol(margaret)\nBewitching(sheree)\nforall x (Bewitching(x) -> Mongol(x))\nBewitching(margaret) and Seedless(margaret) -> Overbusy(margaret)\nforall x (Mongol(x) -> Overbusy(x))\n\nnot Seedless(mindy)\n\ntherefore Seedless(mindy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Berkeley is hearty. Nate is colorless. Neilla is dire. Furry people are colorless. If Nate is dire and Nate is hearty then Nate is vulgar. All colorless people are vulgar. Neilla is colorless.", "logic": "\nHearty(berkeley)\nColorless(nate)\nDire(neilla)\nforall x (Dire(x) -> Colorless(x))\nDire(nate) and Hearty(nate) -> Vulgar(nate)\nforall x (Colorless(x) -> Vulgar(x))\n\nColorless(neilla)\n\nDire(neilla) and forall x (Dire(x) -> Colorless(x)) -> therefore Colorless(neilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Marlee is unendowed. Stanly is amphibious. Willetta is scrimpy. Furry people are amphibious. If Stanly is scrimpy and Stanly is unendowed then Stanly is rising. All amphibious people are rising. Willetta is not amphibious.", "logic": "\nUnendowed(marlee)\nAmphibious(stanly)\nScrimpy(willetta)\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) -> Amphibious(x))\nScrimpy(stanly) and Unendowed(stanly) -> Rising(stanly)\nforall x (Amphibious(x) -> Rising(x))\n\nnot Amphibious(willetta)\n\nScrimpy(willetta) and forall x (Scrimpy(x) -> Amphibious(x)) -> therefore Amphibious(willetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Sergei is maladroit. Lenna is prudent. Bettine is gravelly. Furry people are prudent. If Lenna is gravelly and Lenna is maladroit then Lenna is mensural. All prudent people are mensural. Bettine is mensural.", "logic": "\nMaladroit(sergei)\nPrudent(lenna)\nGravelly(bettine)\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Prudent(x))\nGravelly(lenna) and Maladroit(lenna) -> Mensural(lenna)\nforall x (Prudent(x) -> Mensural(x))\n\nMensural(bettine)\n\nGravelly(bettine) and forall x (Gravelly(x) -> Prudent(x)) -> therefore Prudent(bettine) Prudent(bettine) and forall x (Prudent(x) -> Mensural(x)) -> therefore Mensural(bettine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Goose is muslim. Arlie is tobagonian. Quinlan is inbound. Furry people are tobagonian. If Arlie is inbound and Arlie is muslim then Arlie is synergetic. All tobagonian people are synergetic. Quinlan is not synergetic.", "logic": "\nMuslim(goose)\nTobagonian(arlie)\nInbound(quinlan)\nforall x (Inbound(x) -> Tobagonian(x))\nInbound(arlie) and Muslim(arlie) -> Synergetic(arlie)\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Synergetic(x))\n\nnot Synergetic(quinlan)\n\nInbound(quinlan) and forall x (Inbound(x) -> Tobagonian(x)) -> therefore Tobagonian(quinlan) Tobagonian(quinlan) and forall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Synergetic(x)) -> therefore Synergetic(quinlan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Ninetta is patellar. Victor is forensic. Charmain is stroppy. Furry people are forensic. If Victor is stroppy and Victor is patellar then Victor is homologic. All forensic people are homologic. Ninetta is not forensic.", "logic": "\nPatellar(ninetta)\nForensic(victor)\nStroppy(charmain)\nforall x (Stroppy(x) -> Forensic(x))\nStroppy(victor) and Patellar(victor) -> Homologic(victor)\nforall x (Forensic(x) -> Homologic(x))\n\nnot Forensic(ninetta)\n\nforall x (Stroppy(x) -> Forensic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Rab is latter. Arline is darkish. Chriss is bronzy. Furry people are darkish. If Arline is bronzy and Arline is latter then Arline is goofy. All darkish people are goofy. Rab is goofy.", "logic": "\nLatter(rab)\nDarkish(arline)\nBronzy(chriss)\nforall x (Bronzy(x) -> Darkish(x))\nBronzy(arline) and Latter(arline) -> Goofy(arline)\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> Goofy(x))\n\nGoofy(rab)\n\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> Goofy(x)) <- forall x (Bronzy(x) -> Darkish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Sauncho is morphemic. Lauri is dental. Darsie is outcaste. Furry people are dental. If Lauri is outcaste and Lauri is morphemic then Lauri is partizan. All dental people are partizan. Darsie is not young.", "logic": "\nMorphemic(sauncho)\nDental(lauri)\nOutcaste(darsie)\nforall x (Outcaste(x) -> Dental(x))\nOutcaste(lauri) and Morphemic(lauri) -> Partizan(lauri)\nforall x (Dental(x) -> Partizan(x))\n\nnot Young(darsie)\n\nnot Young(darsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Mae is punitory. Howard is childless. Cass is buttonlike. Furry people are childless. If Howard is buttonlike and Howard is punitory then Howard is bismuthic. All childless people are bismuthic. Cass is big.", "logic": "\nPunitory(mae)\nChildless(howard)\nButtonlike(cass)\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Childless(x))\nButtonlike(howard) and Punitory(howard) -> Bismuthic(howard)\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\n\nBig(cass)\n\nBig(cass) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Jocelin is illogical. Algernon is exempt. Turner is pink. Furry people are exempt. If Algernon is pink and Algernon is illogical then Algernon is inhumane. All exempt people are inhumane. Algernon is not young.", "logic": "\nIllogical(jocelin)\nExempt(algernon)\nPink(turner)\nforall x (Pink(x) -> Exempt(x))\nPink(algernon) and Illogical(algernon) -> Inhumane(algernon)\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Inhumane(x))\n\nnot Young(algernon)\n\nnot Young(algernon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "Evangelia is gushing. Arleta is geniculate. Kellia is lossless. Furry people are geniculate. If Arleta is lossless and Arleta is gushing then Arleta is earthy. All geniculate people are earthy. Arleta is gushing.", "logic": "\nGushing(evangelia)\nGeniculate(arleta)\nLossless(kellia)\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Geniculate(x))\nLossless(arleta) and Gushing(arleta) -> Earthy(arleta)\nforall x (Geniculate(x) -> Earthy(x))\n\nGushing(arleta)\n\nGushing(arleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1366"} {"premises": "The plato is unsworn. The plato hymn the carmela. The plato denote the carmela. The carmela nazify the plato. The carmela is clear. The carmela hymn the plato. The carmela denote the plato. If someone nazify the carmela and they visit the plato then they are branchy. If someone nazify the plato then they visit the carmela. If someone denote the plato and they visit the carmela then they are primal. If someone nazify the carmela and they like the carmela then the carmela nazify the plato. If someone denote the plato then the plato is clear. If the plato nazify the carmela and the plato denote the carmela then the carmela denote the plato. The carmela denote the plato.", "logic": "\nUnsworn(plato)\nHymn(plato, carmela)\nDenote(plato, carmela)\nNazify(carmela, plato)\nClear(carmela)\nHymn(carmela, plato)\nDenote(carmela, plato)\nforall x (Nazify(x, carmela) and Denote(x, plato) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Nazify(x, plato) -> Denote(x, carmela))\nforall x (Denote(x, plato) and Denote(x, carmela) -> Primal(x))\nforall x (Nazify(x, carmela) and Hymn(x, carmela) -> Nazify(carmela, plato))\nforall x (Denote(x, plato) -> Clear(plato))\nNazify(plato, carmela) and Denote(plato, carmela) -> Denote(carmela, plato)\n\nDenote(carmela, plato)\n\ntherefore Denote(carmela, plato)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The toby is vehicular. The toby imply the eugene. The toby riddle the eugene. The eugene disfavour the toby. The eugene is diplomatic. The eugene imply the toby. The eugene riddle the toby. If someone disfavour the eugene and they visit the toby then they are chewy. If someone disfavour the toby then they visit the eugene. If someone riddle the toby and they visit the eugene then they are peculiar. If someone disfavour the eugene and they like the eugene then the eugene disfavour the toby. If someone riddle the toby then the toby is diplomatic. If the toby disfavour the eugene and the toby riddle the eugene then the eugene riddle the toby. The toby does not like the eugene.", "logic": "\nVehicular(toby)\nImply(toby, eugene)\nRiddle(toby, eugene)\nDisfavour(eugene, toby)\nDiplomatic(eugene)\nImply(eugene, toby)\nRiddle(eugene, toby)\nforall x (Disfavour(x, eugene) and Riddle(x, toby) -> Chewy(x))\nforall x (Disfavour(x, toby) -> Riddle(x, eugene))\nforall x (Riddle(x, toby) and Riddle(x, eugene) -> Peculiar(x))\nforall x (Disfavour(x, eugene) and Imply(x, eugene) -> Disfavour(eugene, toby))\nforall x (Riddle(x, toby) -> Diplomatic(toby))\nDisfavour(toby, eugene) and Riddle(toby, eugene) -> Riddle(eugene, toby)\n\nnot Imply(toby, eugene)\n\ntherefore Imply(toby, eugene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The mamie is treelike. The mamie bastardise the milka. The mamie character the milka. The milka shrug the mamie. The milka is placed. The milka bastardise the mamie. The milka character the mamie. If someone shrug the milka and they visit the mamie then they are caudal. If someone shrug the mamie then they visit the milka. If someone character the mamie and they visit the milka then they are rainless. If someone shrug the milka and they like the milka then the milka shrug the mamie. If someone character the mamie then the mamie is placed. If the mamie shrug the milka and the mamie character the milka then the milka character the mamie. The milka character the milka.", "logic": "\nTreelike(mamie)\nBastardise(mamie, milka)\nCharacter(mamie, milka)\nShrug(milka, mamie)\nPlaced(milka)\nBastardise(milka, mamie)\nCharacter(milka, mamie)\nforall x (Shrug(x, milka) and Character(x, mamie) -> Caudal(x))\nforall x (Shrug(x, mamie) -> Character(x, milka))\nforall x (Character(x, mamie) and Character(x, milka) -> Rainless(x))\nforall x (Shrug(x, milka) and Bastardise(x, milka) -> Shrug(milka, mamie))\nforall x (Character(x, mamie) -> Placed(mamie))\nShrug(mamie, milka) and Character(mamie, milka) -> Character(milka, mamie)\n\nCharacter(milka, milka)\n\nShrug(milka, mamie) and forall x (Shrug(x, mamie) -> Character(x, milka)) -> therefore Character(milka, milka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The godart is gruff. The godart reshape the vannie. The godart quarantine the vannie. The vannie stereotype the godart. The vannie is mosaic. The vannie reshape the godart. The vannie quarantine the godart. If someone stereotype the vannie and they visit the godart then they are confucian. If someone stereotype the godart then they visit the vannie. If someone quarantine the godart and they visit the vannie then they are sardinian. If someone stereotype the vannie and they like the vannie then the vannie stereotype the godart. If someone quarantine the godart then the godart is mosaic. If the godart stereotype the vannie and the godart quarantine the vannie then the vannie quarantine the godart. The godart is not mosaic.", "logic": "\nGruff(godart)\nReshape(godart, vannie)\nQuarantine(godart, vannie)\nStereotype(vannie, godart)\nMosaic(vannie)\nReshape(vannie, godart)\nQuarantine(vannie, godart)\nforall x (Stereotype(x, vannie) and Quarantine(x, godart) -> Confucian(x))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, godart) -> Quarantine(x, vannie))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, godart) and Quarantine(x, vannie) -> Sardinian(x))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, vannie) and Reshape(x, vannie) -> Stereotype(vannie, godart))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, godart) -> Mosaic(godart))\nStereotype(godart, vannie) and Quarantine(godart, vannie) -> Quarantine(vannie, godart)\n\nnot Mosaic(godart)\n\nQuarantine(vannie, godart) and forall x (Quarantine(x, godart) -> Mosaic(godart)) -> therefore Mosaic(godart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The ulrick is granulated. The ulrick position the allys. The ulrick vesiculate the allys. The allys commingle the ulrick. The allys is grudging. The allys position the ulrick. The allys vesiculate the ulrick. If someone commingle the allys and they visit the ulrick then they are mongol. If someone commingle the ulrick then they visit the allys. If someone vesiculate the ulrick and they visit the allys then they are negligent. If someone commingle the allys and they like the allys then the allys commingle the ulrick. If someone vesiculate the ulrick then the ulrick is grudging. If the ulrick commingle the allys and the ulrick vesiculate the allys then the allys vesiculate the ulrick. The allys is negligent.", "logic": "\nGranulated(ulrick)\nPosition(ulrick, allys)\nVesiculate(ulrick, allys)\nCommingle(allys, ulrick)\nGrudging(allys)\nPosition(allys, ulrick)\nVesiculate(allys, ulrick)\nforall x (Commingle(x, allys) and Vesiculate(x, ulrick) -> Mongol(x))\nforall x (Commingle(x, ulrick) -> Vesiculate(x, allys))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, ulrick) and Vesiculate(x, allys) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Commingle(x, allys) and Position(x, allys) -> Commingle(allys, ulrick))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, ulrick) -> Grudging(ulrick))\nCommingle(ulrick, allys) and Vesiculate(ulrick, allys) -> Vesiculate(allys, ulrick)\n\nNegligent(allys)\n\nCommingle(allys, ulrick) and forall x (Commingle(x, ulrick) -> Vesiculate(x, allys)) -> therefore Vesiculate(allys, allys) Vesiculate(allys, ulrick) and Vesiculate(allys, allys) and forall x (Vesiculate(x, ulrick) and Vesiculate(x, allys) -> Negligent(x)) -> therefore Negligent(allys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The davin is osseous. The davin disapprove the leola. The davin dine the leola. The leola seine the davin. The leola is monitory. The leola disapprove the davin. The leola dine the davin. If someone seine the leola and they visit the davin then they are callable. If someone seine the davin then they visit the leola. If someone dine the davin and they visit the leola then they are ionised. If someone seine the leola and they like the leola then the leola seine the davin. If someone dine the davin then the davin is monitory. If the davin seine the leola and the davin dine the leola then the leola dine the davin. The leola is not ionised.", "logic": "\nOsseous(davin)\nDisapprove(davin, leola)\nDine(davin, leola)\nSeine(leola, davin)\nMonitory(leola)\nDisapprove(leola, davin)\nDine(leola, davin)\nforall x (Seine(x, leola) and Dine(x, davin) -> Callable(x))\nforall x (Seine(x, davin) -> Dine(x, leola))\nforall x (Dine(x, davin) and Dine(x, leola) -> Ionised(x))\nforall x (Seine(x, leola) and Disapprove(x, leola) -> Seine(leola, davin))\nforall x (Dine(x, davin) -> Monitory(davin))\nSeine(davin, leola) and Dine(davin, leola) -> Dine(leola, davin)\n\nnot Ionised(leola)\n\nSeine(leola, davin) and forall x (Seine(x, davin) -> Dine(x, leola)) -> therefore Dine(leola, leola) Dine(leola, davin) and Dine(leola, leola) and forall x (Dine(x, davin) and Dine(x, leola) -> Ionised(x)) -> therefore Ionised(leola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The etheline is cankerous. The etheline obturate the delcina. The etheline balkanise the delcina. The delcina fair the etheline. The delcina is greedy. The delcina obturate the etheline. The delcina balkanise the etheline. If someone fair the delcina and they visit the etheline then they are unfocused. If someone fair the etheline then they visit the delcina. If someone balkanise the etheline and they visit the delcina then they are soldierly. If someone fair the delcina and they like the delcina then the delcina fair the etheline. If someone balkanise the etheline then the etheline is greedy. If the etheline fair the delcina and the etheline balkanise the delcina then the delcina balkanise the etheline. The etheline is not soldierly.", "logic": "\nCankerous(etheline)\nObturate(etheline, delcina)\nBalkanise(etheline, delcina)\nFair(delcina, etheline)\nGreedy(delcina)\nObturate(delcina, etheline)\nBalkanise(delcina, etheline)\nforall x (Fair(x, delcina) and Balkanise(x, etheline) -> Unfocused(x))\nforall x (Fair(x, etheline) -> Balkanise(x, delcina))\nforall x (Balkanise(x, etheline) and Balkanise(x, delcina) -> Soldierly(x))\nforall x (Fair(x, delcina) and Obturate(x, delcina) -> Fair(delcina, etheline))\nforall x (Balkanise(x, etheline) -> Greedy(etheline))\nFair(etheline, delcina) and Balkanise(etheline, delcina) -> Balkanise(delcina, etheline)\n\nnot Soldierly(etheline)\n\nforall x (Balkanise(x, etheline) and Balkanise(x, delcina) -> Soldierly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The gabbi is briery. The gabbi bite the norri. The gabbi wallpaper the norri. The norri offer the gabbi. The norri is transitive. The norri bite the gabbi. The norri wallpaper the gabbi. If someone offer the norri and they visit the gabbi then they are desolate. If someone offer the gabbi then they visit the norri. If someone wallpaper the gabbi and they visit the norri then they are eudaemonic. If someone offer the norri and they like the norri then the norri offer the gabbi. If someone wallpaper the gabbi then the gabbi is transitive. If the gabbi offer the norri and the gabbi wallpaper the norri then the norri wallpaper the gabbi. The norri is desolate.", "logic": "\nBriery(gabbi)\nBite(gabbi, norri)\nWallpaper(gabbi, norri)\nOffer(norri, gabbi)\nTransitive(norri)\nBite(norri, gabbi)\nWallpaper(norri, gabbi)\nforall x (Offer(x, norri) and Wallpaper(x, gabbi) -> Desolate(x))\nforall x (Offer(x, gabbi) -> Wallpaper(x, norri))\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, gabbi) and Wallpaper(x, norri) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nforall x (Offer(x, norri) and Bite(x, norri) -> Offer(norri, gabbi))\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, gabbi) -> Transitive(gabbi))\nOffer(gabbi, norri) and Wallpaper(gabbi, norri) -> Wallpaper(norri, gabbi)\n\nDesolate(norri)\n\nforall x (Offer(x, norri) and Wallpaper(x, gabbi) -> Desolate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The shanta is chesty. The shanta motivate the claire. The shanta campaign the claire. The claire unfasten the shanta. The claire is ribbed. The claire motivate the shanta. The claire campaign the shanta. If someone unfasten the claire and they visit the shanta then they are potted. If someone unfasten the shanta then they visit the claire. If someone campaign the shanta and they visit the claire then they are unskillful. If someone unfasten the claire and they like the claire then the claire unfasten the shanta. If someone campaign the shanta then the shanta is ribbed. If the shanta unfasten the claire and the shanta campaign the claire then the claire campaign the shanta. The shanta is not potted.", "logic": "\nChesty(shanta)\nMotivate(shanta, claire)\nCampaign(shanta, claire)\nUnfasten(claire, shanta)\nRibbed(claire)\nMotivate(claire, shanta)\nCampaign(claire, shanta)\nforall x (Unfasten(x, claire) and Campaign(x, shanta) -> Potted(x))\nforall x (Unfasten(x, shanta) -> Campaign(x, claire))\nforall x (Campaign(x, shanta) and Campaign(x, claire) -> Unskillful(x))\nforall x (Unfasten(x, claire) and Motivate(x, claire) -> Unfasten(claire, shanta))\nforall x (Campaign(x, shanta) -> Ribbed(shanta))\nUnfasten(shanta, claire) and Campaign(shanta, claire) -> Campaign(claire, shanta)\n\nnot Potted(shanta)\n\nforall x (Unfasten(x, claire) and Campaign(x, shanta) -> Potted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The bartel is burled. The bartel abase the chandal. The bartel knuckle the chandal. The chandal cumulate the bartel. The chandal is auricular. The chandal abase the bartel. The chandal knuckle the bartel. If someone cumulate the chandal and they visit the bartel then they are referenced. If someone cumulate the bartel then they visit the chandal. If someone knuckle the bartel and they visit the chandal then they are qabalistic. If someone cumulate the chandal and they like the chandal then the chandal cumulate the bartel. If someone knuckle the bartel then the bartel is auricular. If the bartel cumulate the chandal and the bartel knuckle the chandal then the chandal knuckle the bartel. The bartel cumulate the chandal.", "logic": "\nBurled(bartel)\nAbase(bartel, chandal)\nKnuckle(bartel, chandal)\nCumulate(chandal, bartel)\nAuricular(chandal)\nAbase(chandal, bartel)\nKnuckle(chandal, bartel)\nforall x (Cumulate(x, chandal) and Knuckle(x, bartel) -> Referenced(x))\nforall x (Cumulate(x, bartel) -> Knuckle(x, chandal))\nforall x (Knuckle(x, bartel) and Knuckle(x, chandal) -> Qabalistic(x))\nforall x (Cumulate(x, chandal) and Abase(x, chandal) -> Cumulate(chandal, bartel))\nforall x (Knuckle(x, bartel) -> Auricular(bartel))\nCumulate(bartel, chandal) and Knuckle(bartel, chandal) -> Knuckle(chandal, bartel)\n\nCumulate(bartel, chandal)\n\nCumulate(bartel, chandal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The sylvester is suspensive. The sylvester vitaminize the clayton. The sylvester lilt the clayton. The clayton librate the sylvester. The clayton is sedgy. The clayton vitaminize the sylvester. The clayton lilt the sylvester. If someone librate the clayton and they visit the sylvester then they are fastened. If someone librate the sylvester then they visit the clayton. If someone lilt the sylvester and they visit the clayton then they are profane. If someone librate the clayton and they like the clayton then the clayton librate the sylvester. If someone lilt the sylvester then the sylvester is sedgy. If the sylvester librate the clayton and the sylvester lilt the clayton then the clayton lilt the sylvester. The clayton is not suspensive.", "logic": "\nSuspensive(sylvester)\nVitaminize(sylvester, clayton)\nLilt(sylvester, clayton)\nLibrate(clayton, sylvester)\nSedgy(clayton)\nVitaminize(clayton, sylvester)\nLilt(clayton, sylvester)\nforall x (Librate(x, clayton) and Lilt(x, sylvester) -> Fastened(x))\nforall x (Librate(x, sylvester) -> Lilt(x, clayton))\nforall x (Lilt(x, sylvester) and Lilt(x, clayton) -> Profane(x))\nforall x (Librate(x, clayton) and Vitaminize(x, clayton) -> Librate(clayton, sylvester))\nforall x (Lilt(x, sylvester) -> Sedgy(sylvester))\nLibrate(sylvester, clayton) and Lilt(sylvester, clayton) -> Lilt(clayton, sylvester)\n\nnot Suspensive(clayton)\n\nnot Suspensive(clayton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "The elyse is quintuple. The elyse french the sheelagh. The elyse salaam the sheelagh. The sheelagh lustrate the elyse. The sheelagh is peanut. The sheelagh french the elyse. The sheelagh salaam the elyse. If someone lustrate the sheelagh and they visit the elyse then they are blonde. If someone lustrate the elyse then they visit the sheelagh. If someone salaam the elyse and they visit the sheelagh then they are macabre. If someone lustrate the sheelagh and they like the sheelagh then the sheelagh lustrate the elyse. If someone salaam the elyse then the elyse is peanut. If the elyse lustrate the sheelagh and the elyse salaam the sheelagh then the sheelagh salaam the elyse. The elyse salaam the elyse.", "logic": "\nQuintuple(elyse)\nFrench(elyse, sheelagh)\nSalaam(elyse, sheelagh)\nLustrate(sheelagh, elyse)\nPeanut(sheelagh)\nFrench(sheelagh, elyse)\nSalaam(sheelagh, elyse)\nforall x (Lustrate(x, sheelagh) and Salaam(x, elyse) -> Blonde(x))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, elyse) -> Salaam(x, sheelagh))\nforall x (Salaam(x, elyse) and Salaam(x, sheelagh) -> Macabre(x))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, sheelagh) and French(x, sheelagh) -> Lustrate(sheelagh, elyse))\nforall x (Salaam(x, elyse) -> Peanut(elyse))\nLustrate(elyse, sheelagh) and Salaam(elyse, sheelagh) -> Salaam(sheelagh, elyse)\n\nSalaam(elyse, elyse)\n\nSalaam(elyse, elyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-303"} {"premises": "Ishmael is ridiculous. Robbert is socialised. Roselia is socialised. Russ is choosy. If someone is ridiculous and navicular then they are baggy. All ridiculous people are navicular. Russ is choosy.", "logic": "\nRidiculous(ishmael)\nSocialised(robbert)\nSocialised(roselia)\nChoosy(russ)\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) and Navicular(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Navicular(x))\n\nChoosy(russ)\n\ntherefore Choosy(russ)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Nevil is enchanting. Fons is verboten. Willy is verboten. Bari is sweetened. If someone is enchanting and brittle then they are bonkers. All enchanting people are brittle. Fons is not verboten.", "logic": "\nEnchanting(nevil)\nVerboten(fons)\nVerboten(willy)\nSweetened(bari)\nforall x (Enchanting(x) and Brittle(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Enchanting(x) -> Brittle(x))\n\nnot Verboten(fons)\n\ntherefore Verboten(fons)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Mitch is autotypic. Neda is swazi. Blanche is swazi. Jose is beltlike. If someone is autotypic and smuggled then they are leaden. All autotypic people are smuggled. Mitch is smuggled.", "logic": "\nAutotypic(mitch)\nSwazi(neda)\nSwazi(blanche)\nBeltlike(jose)\nforall x (Autotypic(x) and Smuggled(x) -> Leaden(x))\nforall x (Autotypic(x) -> Smuggled(x))\n\nSmuggled(mitch)\n\nAutotypic(mitch) and forall x (Autotypic(x) -> Smuggled(x)) -> therefore Smuggled(mitch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Jania is parametric. Janaye is scared. Janetta is scared. Anselm is mandean. If someone is parametric and nugatory then they are feudal. All parametric people are nugatory. Jania is not nugatory.", "logic": "\nParametric(jania)\nScared(janaye)\nScared(janetta)\nMandean(anselm)\nforall x (Parametric(x) and Nugatory(x) -> Feudal(x))\nforall x (Parametric(x) -> Nugatory(x))\n\nnot Nugatory(jania)\n\nParametric(jania) and forall x (Parametric(x) -> Nugatory(x)) -> therefore Nugatory(jania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Murielle is failing. Trever is fulminant. Remy is fulminant. Johnette is potable. If someone is failing and lysogenic then they are autolytic. All failing people are lysogenic. Murielle is autolytic.", "logic": "\nFailing(murielle)\nFulminant(trever)\nFulminant(remy)\nPotable(johnette)\nforall x (Failing(x) and Lysogenic(x) -> Autolytic(x))\nforall x (Failing(x) -> Lysogenic(x))\n\nAutolytic(murielle)\n\nFailing(murielle) and forall x (Failing(x) -> Lysogenic(x)) -> therefore Lysogenic(murielle) Failing(murielle) and Lysogenic(murielle) and forall x (Failing(x) and Lysogenic(x) -> Autolytic(x)) -> therefore Autolytic(murielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Matthieu is baronial. Vivyanne is riveting. Michelle is riveting. Orson is undecided. If someone is baronial and trifid then they are immunized. All baronial people are trifid. Matthieu is not immunized.", "logic": "\nBaronial(matthieu)\nRiveting(vivyanne)\nRiveting(michelle)\nUndecided(orson)\nforall x (Baronial(x) and Trifid(x) -> Immunized(x))\nforall x (Baronial(x) -> Trifid(x))\n\nnot Immunized(matthieu)\n\nBaronial(matthieu) and forall x (Baronial(x) -> Trifid(x)) -> therefore Trifid(matthieu) Baronial(matthieu) and Trifid(matthieu) and forall x (Baronial(x) and Trifid(x) -> Immunized(x)) -> therefore Immunized(matthieu)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Thadeus is pigheaded. Haily is mean. Thia is mean. Pryce is unvendible. If someone is pigheaded and mangy then they are heatable. All pigheaded people are mangy. Pryce is not mangy.", "logic": "\nPigheaded(thadeus)\nMean(haily)\nMean(thia)\nUnvendible(pryce)\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) and Mangy(x) -> Heatable(x))\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Mangy(x))\n\nnot Mangy(pryce)\n\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Mangy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Lorene is shoaly. Mendie is mediaeval. Cathrine is mediaeval. Delphinia is xxiv. If someone is shoaly and valuable then they are viselike. All shoaly people are valuable. Cathrine is valuable.", "logic": "\nShoaly(lorene)\nMediaeval(mendie)\nMediaeval(cathrine)\nXxiv(delphinia)\nforall x (Shoaly(x) and Valuable(x) -> Viselike(x))\nforall x (Shoaly(x) -> Valuable(x))\n\nValuable(cathrine)\n\nforall x (Shoaly(x) -> Valuable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Madelle is fiddling. Brana is decumbent. Issie is decumbent. Petronia is xxiii. If someone is fiddling and sinhalese then they are guatemalan. All fiddling people are sinhalese. Brana is not guatemalan.", "logic": "\nFiddling(madelle)\nDecumbent(brana)\nDecumbent(issie)\nXxiii(petronia)\nforall x (Fiddling(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Guatemalan(x))\nforall x (Fiddling(x) -> Sinhalese(x))\n\nnot Guatemalan(brana)\n\nforall x (Fiddling(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Guatemalan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Ruella is deweyan. Lianne is expansible. Drea is expansible. Cameron is erythroid. If someone is deweyan and perilous then they are tenor. All deweyan people are perilous. Cameron is smart.", "logic": "\nDeweyan(ruella)\nExpansible(lianne)\nExpansible(drea)\nErythroid(cameron)\nforall x (Deweyan(x) and Perilous(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Perilous(x))\n\nSmart(cameron)\n\nSmart(cameron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Kacie is miniature. Fleur is rollicking. Dougie is rollicking. Noelle is validated. If someone is miniature and geometric then they are untrained. All miniature people are geometric. Fleur is not validated.", "logic": "\nMiniature(kacie)\nRollicking(fleur)\nRollicking(dougie)\nValidated(noelle)\nforall x (Miniature(x) and Geometric(x) -> Untrained(x))\nforall x (Miniature(x) -> Geometric(x))\n\nnot Validated(fleur)\n\nnot Validated(fleur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Shanie is medullary. Regina is cuneiform. Rosalind is cuneiform. Cheston is streetwise. If someone is medullary and cuspidate then they are verrucose. All medullary people are cuspidate. Shanie is streetwise.", "logic": "\nMedullary(shanie)\nCuneiform(regina)\nCuneiform(rosalind)\nStreetwise(cheston)\nforall x (Medullary(x) and Cuspidate(x) -> Verrucose(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) -> Cuspidate(x))\n\nStreetwise(shanie)\n\nStreetwise(shanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-550"} {"premises": "Gil is crescent. Marci is yokelish. Berkley is yokelish. Nichols is crescent. If someone is crescent then they are contagious. If someone is contagious and not crescent then they are yokelish. If someone is contagious then they are partitive. Marci is yokelish.", "logic": "\nCrescent(gil)\nYokelish(marci)\nYokelish(berkley)\nCrescent(nichols)\nforall x (Crescent(x) -> Contagious(x))\nforall x (Contagious(x) and not Crescent(x) -> Yokelish(x))\nforall x (Contagious(x) -> Partitive(x))\n\nYokelish(marci)\n\ntherefore Yokelish(marci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Oona is hatless. Angelico is unhoped. Adlai is unhoped. Hendrick is hatless. If someone is hatless then they are unparented. If someone is unparented and not hatless then they are unhoped. If someone is unparented then they are rolling. Hendrick is not hatless.", "logic": "\nHatless(oona)\nUnhoped(angelico)\nUnhoped(adlai)\nHatless(hendrick)\nforall x (Hatless(x) -> Unparented(x))\nforall x (Unparented(x) and not Hatless(x) -> Unhoped(x))\nforall x (Unparented(x) -> Rolling(x))\n\nnot Hatless(hendrick)\n\ntherefore Hatless(hendrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Julianne is nourishing. Mandie is inoperable. Dorian is inoperable. Serena is nourishing. If someone is nourishing then they are utility. If someone is utility and not nourishing then they are inoperable. If someone is utility then they are agonadal. Julianne is utility.", "logic": "\nNourishing(julianne)\nInoperable(mandie)\nInoperable(dorian)\nNourishing(serena)\nforall x (Nourishing(x) -> Utility(x))\nforall x (Utility(x) and not Nourishing(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Agonadal(x))\n\nUtility(julianne)\n\nNourishing(julianne) and forall x (Nourishing(x) -> Utility(x)) -> therefore Utility(julianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Henka is tops. Trudi is leering. Lianna is leering. Ariana is tops. If someone is tops then they are adjustive. If someone is adjustive and not tops then they are leering. If someone is adjustive then they are aphoristic. Henka is not adjustive.", "logic": "\nTops(henka)\nLeering(trudi)\nLeering(lianna)\nTops(ariana)\nforall x (Tops(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nforall x (Adjustive(x) and not Tops(x) -> Leering(x))\nforall x (Adjustive(x) -> Aphoristic(x))\n\nnot Adjustive(henka)\n\nTops(henka) and forall x (Tops(x) -> Adjustive(x)) -> therefore Adjustive(henka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Cristy is clement. Dehlia is singing. Allys is singing. Chastity is clement. If someone is clement then they are unbigoted. If someone is unbigoted and not clement then they are singing. If someone is unbigoted then they are unselfish. Chastity is unselfish.", "logic": "\nClement(cristy)\nSinging(dehlia)\nSinging(allys)\nClement(chastity)\nforall x (Clement(x) -> Unbigoted(x))\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) and not Clement(x) -> Singing(x))\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Unselfish(x))\n\nUnselfish(chastity)\n\nClement(chastity) and forall x (Clement(x) -> Unbigoted(x)) -> therefore Unbigoted(chastity) Unbigoted(chastity) and forall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Unselfish(x)) -> therefore Unselfish(chastity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Ciara is balky. Shlomo is unentitled. Tailor is unentitled. Mira is balky. If someone is balky then they are overproud. If someone is overproud and not balky then they are unentitled. If someone is overproud then they are cordless. Mira is not cordless.", "logic": "\nBalky(ciara)\nUnentitled(shlomo)\nUnentitled(tailor)\nBalky(mira)\nforall x (Balky(x) -> Overproud(x))\nforall x (Overproud(x) and not Balky(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Overproud(x) -> Cordless(x))\n\nnot Cordless(mira)\n\nBalky(mira) and forall x (Balky(x) -> Overproud(x)) -> therefore Overproud(mira) Overproud(mira) and forall x (Overproud(x) -> Cordless(x)) -> therefore Cordless(mira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Alfie is indecisive. Jon is gleeful. Paola is gleeful. Giacomo is indecisive. If someone is indecisive then they are galling. If someone is galling and not indecisive then they are gleeful. If someone is galling then they are semantic. Alfie is not gleeful.", "logic": "\nIndecisive(alfie)\nGleeful(jon)\nGleeful(paola)\nIndecisive(giacomo)\nforall x (Indecisive(x) -> Galling(x))\nforall x (Galling(x) and not Indecisive(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Galling(x) -> Semantic(x))\n\nnot Gleeful(alfie)\n\nforall x (Galling(x) and not Indecisive(x) -> Gleeful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Sidney is singable. Beret is pert. Felice is pert. Abbott is singable. If someone is singable then they are pigheaded. If someone is pigheaded and not singable then they are pert. If someone is pigheaded then they are isomorphic. Beret is isomorphic.", "logic": "\nSingable(sidney)\nPert(beret)\nPert(felice)\nSingable(abbott)\nforall x (Singable(x) -> Pigheaded(x))\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) and not Singable(x) -> Pert(x))\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\n\nIsomorphic(beret)\n\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Isomorphic(x)) <- forall x (Singable(x) -> Pigheaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Thomasin is unclogged. Ambur is jainist. Zack is jainist. Zachariah is unclogged. If someone is unclogged then they are cardinal. If someone is cardinal and not unclogged then they are jainist. If someone is cardinal then they are snobby. Ambur is not cardinal.", "logic": "\nUnclogged(thomasin)\nJainist(ambur)\nJainist(zack)\nUnclogged(zachariah)\nforall x (Unclogged(x) -> Cardinal(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and not Unclogged(x) -> Jainist(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) -> Snobby(x))\n\nnot Cardinal(ambur)\n\nforall x (Unclogged(x) -> Cardinal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Lawton is doltish. Starlene is toughened. Katharine is toughened. Krissy is doltish. If someone is doltish then they are faint. If someone is faint and not doltish then they are toughened. If someone is faint then they are treacly. Starlene is round.", "logic": "\nDoltish(lawton)\nToughened(starlene)\nToughened(katharine)\nDoltish(krissy)\nforall x (Doltish(x) -> Faint(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and not Doltish(x) -> Toughened(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Treacly(x))\n\nRound(starlene)\n\nRound(starlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Norina is ctenoid. Bessy is erasable. Greer is erasable. Lawson is ctenoid. If someone is ctenoid then they are wriggling. If someone is wriggling and not ctenoid then they are erasable. If someone is wriggling then they are ruling. Lawson is not quiet.", "logic": "\nCtenoid(norina)\nErasable(bessy)\nErasable(greer)\nCtenoid(lawson)\nforall x (Ctenoid(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) and not Ctenoid(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Ruling(x))\n\nnot Quiet(lawson)\n\nnot Quiet(lawson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "Garvey is atilt. Goldi is chylaceous. Britni is chylaceous. Conan is atilt. If someone is atilt then they are gruff. If someone is gruff and not atilt then they are chylaceous. If someone is gruff then they are innumerous. Garvey is round.", "logic": "\nAtilt(garvey)\nChylaceous(goldi)\nChylaceous(britni)\nAtilt(conan)\nforall x (Atilt(x) -> Gruff(x))\nforall x (Gruff(x) and not Atilt(x) -> Chylaceous(x))\nforall x (Gruff(x) -> Innumerous(x))\n\nRound(garvey)\n\nRound(garvey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-90"} {"premises": "The jason does not chase the garnette. The jason is worrying. The jason consociate the garnette. The garnette taxi the jason. The garnette is worrying. The garnette instil the jason. The garnette consociate the jason. If the garnette instil the jason then the garnette taxi the jason. If something consociate the garnette and the garnette consociate the jason then it taxi the jason. If something instil the jason then the jason instil the garnette. If something is ectopic then it is baked. If something is nodulose then it instil the garnette. If something instil the garnette then it instil the jason. The garnette consociate the jason.", "logic": "\nnot Taxi(jason, garnette)\nWorrying(jason)\nConsociate(jason, garnette)\nTaxi(garnette, jason)\nWorrying(garnette)\nInstil(garnette, jason)\nConsociate(garnette, jason)\nInstil(garnette, jason) -> Taxi(garnette, jason)\nforall x (Consociate(x, garnette) and Consociate(garnette, jason) -> Taxi(x, jason))\nforall x (Instil(x, jason) -> Instil(jason, garnette))\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Baked(x))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Instil(x, garnette))\nforall x (Instil(x, garnette) -> Instil(x, jason))\n\nConsociate(garnette, jason)\n\ntherefore Consociate(garnette, jason)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The jocelin does not chase the marin. The jocelin is orienting. The jocelin slow the marin. The marin jellify the jocelin. The marin is orienting. The marin redline the jocelin. The marin slow the jocelin. If the marin redline the jocelin then the marin jellify the jocelin. If something slow the marin and the marin slow the jocelin then it jellify the jocelin. If something redline the jocelin then the jocelin redline the marin. If something is isotonic then it is carefree. If something is meddlesome then it redline the marin. If something redline the marin then it redline the jocelin. The jocelin jellify the marin.", "logic": "\nnot Jellify(jocelin, marin)\nOrienting(jocelin)\nSlow(jocelin, marin)\nJellify(marin, jocelin)\nOrienting(marin)\nRedline(marin, jocelin)\nSlow(marin, jocelin)\nRedline(marin, jocelin) -> Jellify(marin, jocelin)\nforall x (Slow(x, marin) and Slow(marin, jocelin) -> Jellify(x, jocelin))\nforall x (Redline(x, jocelin) -> Redline(jocelin, marin))\nforall x (Isotonic(x) -> Carefree(x))\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) -> Redline(x, marin))\nforall x (Redline(x, marin) -> Redline(x, jocelin))\n\nJellify(jocelin, marin)\n\ntherefore not Jellify(jocelin, marin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The jewell does not chase the ansell. The jewell is reasonable. The jewell erect the ansell. The ansell corral the jewell. The ansell is reasonable. The ansell ionise the jewell. The ansell erect the jewell. If the ansell ionise the jewell then the ansell corral the jewell. If something erect the ansell and the ansell erect the jewell then it corral the jewell. If something ionise the jewell then the jewell ionise the ansell. If something is miffed then it is dependable. If something is heretical then it ionise the ansell. If something ionise the ansell then it ionise the jewell. The jewell corral the jewell.", "logic": "\nnot Corral(jewell, ansell)\nReasonable(jewell)\nErect(jewell, ansell)\nCorral(ansell, jewell)\nReasonable(ansell)\nIonise(ansell, jewell)\nErect(ansell, jewell)\nIonise(ansell, jewell) -> Corral(ansell, jewell)\nforall x (Erect(x, ansell) and Erect(ansell, jewell) -> Corral(x, jewell))\nforall x (Ionise(x, jewell) -> Ionise(jewell, ansell))\nforall x (Miffed(x) -> Dependable(x))\nforall x (Heretical(x) -> Ionise(x, ansell))\nforall x (Ionise(x, ansell) -> Ionise(x, jewell))\n\nCorral(jewell, jewell)\n\nErect(jewell, ansell) and Erect(ansell, jewell) and forall x (Erect(x, ansell) and Erect(ansell, jewell) -> Corral(x, jewell)) -> therefore Corral(jewell, jewell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The maryjane does not chase the petra. The maryjane is marly. The maryjane schnorr the petra. The petra spell the maryjane. The petra is marly. The petra wage the maryjane. The petra schnorr the maryjane. If the petra wage the maryjane then the petra spell the maryjane. If something schnorr the petra and the petra schnorr the maryjane then it spell the maryjane. If something wage the maryjane then the maryjane wage the petra. If something is surpliced then it is apodictic. If something is nonskid then it wage the petra. If something wage the petra then it wage the maryjane. The maryjane does not chase the maryjane.", "logic": "\nnot Spell(maryjane, petra)\nMarly(maryjane)\nSchnorr(maryjane, petra)\nSpell(petra, maryjane)\nMarly(petra)\nWage(petra, maryjane)\nSchnorr(petra, maryjane)\nWage(petra, maryjane) -> Spell(petra, maryjane)\nforall x (Schnorr(x, petra) and Schnorr(petra, maryjane) -> Spell(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Wage(x, maryjane) -> Wage(maryjane, petra))\nforall x (Surpliced(x) -> Apodictic(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Wage(x, petra))\nforall x (Wage(x, petra) -> Wage(x, maryjane))\n\nnot Spell(maryjane, maryjane)\n\nSchnorr(maryjane, petra) and Schnorr(petra, maryjane) and forall x (Schnorr(x, petra) and Schnorr(petra, maryjane) -> Spell(x, maryjane)) -> therefore Spell(maryjane, maryjane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The debra does not chase the roberto. The debra is twelfth. The debra needle the roberto. The roberto shoehorn the debra. The roberto is twelfth. The roberto shimmy the debra. The roberto needle the debra. If the roberto shimmy the debra then the roberto shoehorn the debra. If something needle the roberto and the roberto needle the debra then it shoehorn the debra. If something shimmy the debra then the debra shimmy the roberto. If something is somnolent then it is arcadian. If something is streetwise then it shimmy the roberto. If something shimmy the roberto then it shimmy the debra. The debra shimmy the debra.", "logic": "\nnot Shoehorn(debra, roberto)\nTwelfth(debra)\nNeedle(debra, roberto)\nShoehorn(roberto, debra)\nTwelfth(roberto)\nShimmy(roberto, debra)\nNeedle(roberto, debra)\nShimmy(roberto, debra) -> Shoehorn(roberto, debra)\nforall x (Needle(x, roberto) and Needle(roberto, debra) -> Shoehorn(x, debra))\nforall x (Shimmy(x, debra) -> Shimmy(debra, roberto))\nforall x (Somnolent(x) -> Arcadian(x))\nforall x (Streetwise(x) -> Shimmy(x, roberto))\nforall x (Shimmy(x, roberto) -> Shimmy(x, debra))\n\nShimmy(debra, debra)\n\nShimmy(roberto, debra) and forall x (Shimmy(x, debra) -> Shimmy(debra, roberto)) -> therefore Shimmy(debra, roberto) Shimmy(debra, roberto) and forall x (Shimmy(x, roberto) -> Shimmy(x, debra)) -> therefore Shimmy(debra, debra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The valera does not chase the rafe. The valera is eristical. The valera trigger the rafe. The rafe transcribe the valera. The rafe is eristical. The rafe sandbag the valera. The rafe trigger the valera. If the rafe sandbag the valera then the rafe transcribe the valera. If something trigger the rafe and the rafe trigger the valera then it transcribe the valera. If something sandbag the valera then the valera sandbag the rafe. If something is unintended then it is visual. If something is turbid then it sandbag the rafe. If something sandbag the rafe then it sandbag the valera. The valera does not need the valera.", "logic": "\nnot Transcribe(valera, rafe)\nEristical(valera)\nTrigger(valera, rafe)\nTranscribe(rafe, valera)\nEristical(rafe)\nSandbag(rafe, valera)\nTrigger(rafe, valera)\nSandbag(rafe, valera) -> Transcribe(rafe, valera)\nforall x (Trigger(x, rafe) and Trigger(rafe, valera) -> Transcribe(x, valera))\nforall x (Sandbag(x, valera) -> Sandbag(valera, rafe))\nforall x (Unintended(x) -> Visual(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> Sandbag(x, rafe))\nforall x (Sandbag(x, rafe) -> Sandbag(x, valera))\n\nnot Sandbag(valera, valera)\n\nSandbag(rafe, valera) and forall x (Sandbag(x, valera) -> Sandbag(valera, rafe)) -> therefore Sandbag(valera, rafe) Sandbag(valera, rafe) and forall x (Sandbag(x, rafe) -> Sandbag(x, valera)) -> therefore Sandbag(valera, valera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The debi does not chase the orly. The debi is precooled. The debi feed the orly. The orly immunise the debi. The orly is precooled. The orly chime the debi. The orly feed the debi. If the orly chime the debi then the orly immunise the debi. If something feed the orly and the orly feed the debi then it immunise the debi. If something chime the debi then the debi chime the orly. If something is countable then it is apian. If something is anthropic then it chime the orly. If something chime the orly then it chime the debi. The orly is not apian.", "logic": "\nnot Immunise(debi, orly)\nPrecooled(debi)\nFeed(debi, orly)\nImmunise(orly, debi)\nPrecooled(orly)\nChime(orly, debi)\nFeed(orly, debi)\nChime(orly, debi) -> Immunise(orly, debi)\nforall x (Feed(x, orly) and Feed(orly, debi) -> Immunise(x, debi))\nforall x (Chime(x, debi) -> Chime(debi, orly))\nforall x (Countable(x) -> Apian(x))\nforall x (Anthropic(x) -> Chime(x, orly))\nforall x (Chime(x, orly) -> Chime(x, debi))\n\nnot Apian(orly)\n\nforall x (Countable(x) -> Apian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The cayla does not chase the sascha. The cayla is workable. The cayla cabin the sascha. The sascha vitriol the cayla. The sascha is workable. The sascha snuggle the cayla. The sascha cabin the cayla. If the sascha snuggle the cayla then the sascha vitriol the cayla. If something cabin the sascha and the sascha cabin the cayla then it vitriol the cayla. If something snuggle the cayla then the cayla snuggle the sascha. If something is anatomical then it is cytotoxic. If something is prolix then it snuggle the sascha. If something snuggle the sascha then it snuggle the cayla. The cayla is cytotoxic.", "logic": "\nnot Vitriol(cayla, sascha)\nWorkable(cayla)\nCabin(cayla, sascha)\nVitriol(sascha, cayla)\nWorkable(sascha)\nSnuggle(sascha, cayla)\nCabin(sascha, cayla)\nSnuggle(sascha, cayla) -> Vitriol(sascha, cayla)\nforall x (Cabin(x, sascha) and Cabin(sascha, cayla) -> Vitriol(x, cayla))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, cayla) -> Snuggle(cayla, sascha))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Prolix(x) -> Snuggle(x, sascha))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, sascha) -> Snuggle(x, cayla))\n\nCytotoxic(cayla)\n\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Cytotoxic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The shalom does not chase the janessa. The shalom is shaping. The shalom gibe the janessa. The janessa mortgage the shalom. The janessa is shaping. The janessa flee the shalom. The janessa gibe the shalom. If the janessa flee the shalom then the janessa mortgage the shalom. If something gibe the janessa and the janessa gibe the shalom then it mortgage the shalom. If something flee the shalom then the shalom flee the janessa. If something is surviving then it is rateable. If something is modeled then it flee the janessa. If something flee the janessa then it flee the shalom. The janessa does not need the janessa.", "logic": "\nnot Mortgage(shalom, janessa)\nShaping(shalom)\nGibe(shalom, janessa)\nMortgage(janessa, shalom)\nShaping(janessa)\nFlee(janessa, shalom)\nGibe(janessa, shalom)\nFlee(janessa, shalom) -> Mortgage(janessa, shalom)\nforall x (Gibe(x, janessa) and Gibe(janessa, shalom) -> Mortgage(x, shalom))\nforall x (Flee(x, shalom) -> Flee(shalom, janessa))\nforall x (Surviving(x) -> Rateable(x))\nforall x (Modeled(x) -> Flee(x, janessa))\nforall x (Flee(x, janessa) -> Flee(x, shalom))\n\nnot Flee(janessa, janessa)\n\nforall x (Modeled(x) -> Flee(x, janessa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The moya does not chase the aloysia. The moya is ammoniac. The moya hone the aloysia. The aloysia abstain the moya. The aloysia is ammoniac. The aloysia triumph the moya. The aloysia hone the moya. If the aloysia triumph the moya then the aloysia abstain the moya. If something hone the aloysia and the aloysia hone the moya then it abstain the moya. If something triumph the moya then the moya triumph the aloysia. If something is slumbrous then it is unscalable. If something is home then it triumph the aloysia. If something triumph the aloysia then it triumph the moya. The aloysia is blue.", "logic": "\nnot Abstain(moya, aloysia)\nAmmoniac(moya)\nHone(moya, aloysia)\nAbstain(aloysia, moya)\nAmmoniac(aloysia)\nTriumph(aloysia, moya)\nHone(aloysia, moya)\nTriumph(aloysia, moya) -> Abstain(aloysia, moya)\nforall x (Hone(x, aloysia) and Hone(aloysia, moya) -> Abstain(x, moya))\nforall x (Triumph(x, moya) -> Triumph(moya, aloysia))\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) -> Unscalable(x))\nforall x (Home(x) -> Triumph(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Triumph(x, aloysia) -> Triumph(x, moya))\n\nBlue(aloysia)\n\nBlue(aloysia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The brigid does not chase the felice. The brigid is paradisal. The brigid restart the felice. The felice annoy the brigid. The felice is paradisal. The felice colorise the brigid. The felice restart the brigid. If the felice colorise the brigid then the felice annoy the brigid. If something restart the felice and the felice restart the brigid then it annoy the brigid. If something colorise the brigid then the brigid colorise the felice. If something is valid then it is drafty. If something is respective then it colorise the felice. If something colorise the felice then it colorise the brigid. The felice does not see the felice.", "logic": "\nnot Annoy(brigid, felice)\nParadisal(brigid)\nRestart(brigid, felice)\nAnnoy(felice, brigid)\nParadisal(felice)\nColorise(felice, brigid)\nRestart(felice, brigid)\nColorise(felice, brigid) -> Annoy(felice, brigid)\nforall x (Restart(x, felice) and Restart(felice, brigid) -> Annoy(x, brigid))\nforall x (Colorise(x, brigid) -> Colorise(brigid, felice))\nforall x (Valid(x) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Colorise(x, felice))\nforall x (Colorise(x, felice) -> Colorise(x, brigid))\n\nnot Restart(felice, felice)\n\nnot Restart(felice, felice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "The wolfgang does not chase the doloritas. The wolfgang is nosocomial. The wolfgang quibble the doloritas. The doloritas clapboard the wolfgang. The doloritas is nosocomial. The doloritas espouse the wolfgang. The doloritas quibble the wolfgang. If the doloritas espouse the wolfgang then the doloritas clapboard the wolfgang. If something quibble the doloritas and the doloritas quibble the wolfgang then it clapboard the wolfgang. If something espouse the wolfgang then the wolfgang espouse the doloritas. If something is silvern then it is unchained. If something is propertied then it espouse the doloritas. If something espouse the doloritas then it espouse the wolfgang. The doloritas is silvern.", "logic": "\nnot Clapboard(wolfgang, doloritas)\nNosocomial(wolfgang)\nQuibble(wolfgang, doloritas)\nClapboard(doloritas, wolfgang)\nNosocomial(doloritas)\nEspouse(doloritas, wolfgang)\nQuibble(doloritas, wolfgang)\nEspouse(doloritas, wolfgang) -> Clapboard(doloritas, wolfgang)\nforall x (Quibble(x, doloritas) and Quibble(doloritas, wolfgang) -> Clapboard(x, wolfgang))\nforall x (Espouse(x, wolfgang) -> Espouse(wolfgang, doloritas))\nforall x (Silvern(x) -> Unchained(x))\nforall x (Propertied(x) -> Espouse(x, doloritas))\nforall x (Espouse(x, doloritas) -> Espouse(x, wolfgang))\n\nSilvern(doloritas)\n\nSilvern(doloritas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-53"} {"premises": "Korry is angered. Korry is palpable. Korry is unmarried. Korry is bulgy. Korry is manky. Garold is palpable. Garold is unmarried. Garold is bulgy. Garold is manky. Ellissa is palpable. Ellissa is unmarried. Ellissa is faecal. Ellissa is reserved. Ellissa is bulgy. Ellissa is manky. Vic is faecal. Kind people are angered. If someone is unmarried and angered then they are reserved. Young, bulgy people are faecal. Ellissa is bulgy.", "logic": "\nAngered(korry)\nPalpable(korry)\nUnmarried(korry)\nBulgy(korry)\nManky(korry)\nPalpable(garold)\nUnmarried(garold)\nBulgy(garold)\nManky(garold)\nPalpable(ellissa)\nUnmarried(ellissa)\nFaecal(ellissa)\nReserved(ellissa)\nBulgy(ellissa)\nManky(ellissa)\nFaecal(vic)\nforall x (Unmarried(x) -> Angered(x))\nforall x (Unmarried(x) and Angered(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Manky(x) and Bulgy(x) -> Faecal(x))\n\nBulgy(ellissa)\n\ntherefore Bulgy(ellissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Kimmi is coral. Kimmi is anterior. Kimmi is racemose. Kimmi is plundered. Kimmi is lustreless. Karalee is anterior. Karalee is racemose. Karalee is plundered. Karalee is lustreless. Dotty is anterior. Dotty is racemose. Dotty is shinto. Dotty is furthest. Dotty is plundered. Dotty is lustreless. Saraann is shinto. Kind people are coral. If someone is racemose and coral then they are furthest. Young, plundered people are shinto. Dotty is not lustreless.", "logic": "\nCoral(kimmi)\nAnterior(kimmi)\nRacemose(kimmi)\nPlundered(kimmi)\nLustreless(kimmi)\nAnterior(karalee)\nRacemose(karalee)\nPlundered(karalee)\nLustreless(karalee)\nAnterior(dotty)\nRacemose(dotty)\nShinto(dotty)\nFurthest(dotty)\nPlundered(dotty)\nLustreless(dotty)\nShinto(saraann)\nforall x (Racemose(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Racemose(x) and Coral(x) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Lustreless(x) and Plundered(x) -> Shinto(x))\n\nnot Lustreless(dotty)\n\ntherefore Lustreless(dotty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Kelila is apothecial. Kelila is deadpan. Kelila is amidship. Kelila is crenate. Kelila is suffering. Charline is deadpan. Charline is amidship. Charline is crenate. Charline is suffering. Viv is deadpan. Viv is amidship. Viv is applied. Viv is boylike. Viv is crenate. Viv is suffering. Langston is applied. Kind people are apothecial. If someone is amidship and apothecial then they are boylike. Young, crenate people are applied. Viv is apothecial.", "logic": "\nApothecial(kelila)\nDeadpan(kelila)\nAmidship(kelila)\nCrenate(kelila)\nSuffering(kelila)\nDeadpan(charline)\nAmidship(charline)\nCrenate(charline)\nSuffering(charline)\nDeadpan(viv)\nAmidship(viv)\nApplied(viv)\nBoylike(viv)\nCrenate(viv)\nSuffering(viv)\nApplied(langston)\nforall x (Amidship(x) -> Apothecial(x))\nforall x (Amidship(x) and Apothecial(x) -> Boylike(x))\nforall x (Suffering(x) and Crenate(x) -> Applied(x))\n\nApothecial(viv)\n\nAmidship(viv) and forall x (Amidship(x) -> Apothecial(x)) -> therefore Apothecial(viv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Luelle is beetling. Luelle is peaked. Luelle is ratable. Luelle is prisonlike. Luelle is satirical. Roseanna is peaked. Roseanna is ratable. Roseanna is prisonlike. Roseanna is satirical. Anna is peaked. Anna is ratable. Anna is brisk. Anna is canonic. Anna is prisonlike. Anna is satirical. Stew is brisk. Kind people are beetling. If someone is ratable and beetling then they are canonic. Young, prisonlike people are brisk. Roseanna is not beetling.", "logic": "\nBeetling(luelle)\nPeaked(luelle)\nRatable(luelle)\nPrisonlike(luelle)\nSatirical(luelle)\nPeaked(roseanna)\nRatable(roseanna)\nPrisonlike(roseanna)\nSatirical(roseanna)\nPeaked(anna)\nRatable(anna)\nBrisk(anna)\nCanonic(anna)\nPrisonlike(anna)\nSatirical(anna)\nBrisk(stew)\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> Beetling(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) and Beetling(x) -> Canonic(x))\nforall x (Satirical(x) and Prisonlike(x) -> Brisk(x))\n\nnot Beetling(roseanna)\n\nRatable(roseanna) and forall x (Ratable(x) -> Beetling(x)) -> therefore Beetling(roseanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Northrop is splayfoot. Northrop is marbleised. Northrop is nigh. Northrop is aversive. Northrop is worried. Davide is marbleised. Davide is nigh. Davide is aversive. Davide is worried. Elsa is marbleised. Elsa is nigh. Elsa is untethered. Elsa is remorseful. Elsa is aversive. Elsa is worried. Garrot is untethered. Kind people are splayfoot. If someone is nigh and splayfoot then they are remorseful. Young, aversive people are untethered. Davide is remorseful.", "logic": "\nSplayfoot(northrop)\nMarbleised(northrop)\nNigh(northrop)\nAversive(northrop)\nWorried(northrop)\nMarbleised(davide)\nNigh(davide)\nAversive(davide)\nWorried(davide)\nMarbleised(elsa)\nNigh(elsa)\nUntethered(elsa)\nRemorseful(elsa)\nAversive(elsa)\nWorried(elsa)\nUntethered(garrot)\nforall x (Nigh(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\nforall x (Nigh(x) and Splayfoot(x) -> Remorseful(x))\nforall x (Worried(x) and Aversive(x) -> Untethered(x))\n\nRemorseful(davide)\n\nNigh(davide) and forall x (Nigh(x) -> Splayfoot(x)) -> therefore Splayfoot(davide) Nigh(davide) and Splayfoot(davide) and forall x (Nigh(x) and Splayfoot(x) -> Remorseful(x)) -> therefore Remorseful(davide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Felipa is flushed. Felipa is catapultic. Felipa is yearly. Felipa is thwarting. Felipa is squinty. Guthrie is catapultic. Guthrie is yearly. Guthrie is thwarting. Guthrie is squinty. Meris is catapultic. Meris is yearly. Meris is bastard. Meris is cadastral. Meris is thwarting. Meris is squinty. Percy is bastard. Kind people are flushed. If someone is yearly and flushed then they are cadastral. Young, thwarting people are bastard. Guthrie is not cadastral.", "logic": "\nFlushed(felipa)\nCatapultic(felipa)\nYearly(felipa)\nThwarting(felipa)\nSquinty(felipa)\nCatapultic(guthrie)\nYearly(guthrie)\nThwarting(guthrie)\nSquinty(guthrie)\nCatapultic(meris)\nYearly(meris)\nBastard(meris)\nCadastral(meris)\nThwarting(meris)\nSquinty(meris)\nBastard(percy)\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Flushed(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) and Flushed(x) -> Cadastral(x))\nforall x (Squinty(x) and Thwarting(x) -> Bastard(x))\n\nnot Cadastral(guthrie)\n\nYearly(guthrie) and forall x (Yearly(x) -> Flushed(x)) -> therefore Flushed(guthrie) Yearly(guthrie) and Flushed(guthrie) and forall x (Yearly(x) and Flushed(x) -> Cadastral(x)) -> therefore Cadastral(guthrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Gino is scalloped. Gino is cambrian. Gino is lymphoid. Gino is scrubby. Gino is mature. Saunders is cambrian. Saunders is lymphoid. Saunders is scrubby. Saunders is mature. Woodman is cambrian. Woodman is lymphoid. Woodman is collarless. Woodman is polygenic. Woodman is scrubby. Woodman is mature. Lucio is collarless. Kind people are scalloped. If someone is lymphoid and scalloped then they are polygenic. Young, scrubby people are collarless. Lucio is not scalloped.", "logic": "\nScalloped(gino)\nCambrian(gino)\nLymphoid(gino)\nScrubby(gino)\nMature(gino)\nCambrian(saunders)\nLymphoid(saunders)\nScrubby(saunders)\nMature(saunders)\nCambrian(woodman)\nLymphoid(woodman)\nCollarless(woodman)\nPolygenic(woodman)\nScrubby(woodman)\nMature(woodman)\nCollarless(lucio)\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) and Scalloped(x) -> Polygenic(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) and Scrubby(x) -> Collarless(x))\n\nnot Scalloped(lucio)\n\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Scalloped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Steward is upsetting. Steward is squeaky. Steward is despised. Steward is traumatic. Steward is patented. Kayle is squeaky. Kayle is despised. Kayle is traumatic. Kayle is patented. Thorsten is squeaky. Thorsten is despised. Thorsten is hurtful. Thorsten is nitrous. Thorsten is traumatic. Thorsten is patented. Debee is hurtful. Kind people are upsetting. If someone is despised and upsetting then they are nitrous. Young, traumatic people are hurtful. Debee is nitrous.", "logic": "\nUpsetting(steward)\nSqueaky(steward)\nDespised(steward)\nTraumatic(steward)\nPatented(steward)\nSqueaky(kayle)\nDespised(kayle)\nTraumatic(kayle)\nPatented(kayle)\nSqueaky(thorsten)\nDespised(thorsten)\nHurtful(thorsten)\nNitrous(thorsten)\nTraumatic(thorsten)\nPatented(thorsten)\nHurtful(debee)\nforall x (Despised(x) -> Upsetting(x))\nforall x (Despised(x) and Upsetting(x) -> Nitrous(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) and Traumatic(x) -> Hurtful(x))\n\nNitrous(debee)\n\nforall x (Despised(x) and Upsetting(x) -> Nitrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Forester is sniffy. Forester is gingery. Forester is jumentous. Forester is doctoral. Forester is ellipsoid. Rivy is gingery. Rivy is jumentous. Rivy is doctoral. Rivy is ellipsoid. Terrye is gingery. Terrye is jumentous. Terrye is stocky. Terrye is vivacious. Terrye is doctoral. Terrye is ellipsoid. Sib is stocky. Kind people are sniffy. If someone is jumentous and sniffy then they are vivacious. Young, doctoral people are stocky. Sib is not doctoral.", "logic": "\nSniffy(forester)\nGingery(forester)\nJumentous(forester)\nDoctoral(forester)\nEllipsoid(forester)\nGingery(rivy)\nJumentous(rivy)\nDoctoral(rivy)\nEllipsoid(rivy)\nGingery(terrye)\nJumentous(terrye)\nStocky(terrye)\nVivacious(terrye)\nDoctoral(terrye)\nEllipsoid(terrye)\nStocky(sib)\nforall x (Jumentous(x) -> Sniffy(x))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) and Sniffy(x) -> Vivacious(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Doctoral(x) -> Stocky(x))\n\nnot Doctoral(sib)\n\nnot Doctoral(sib) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Jefferson is assistant. Jefferson is consular. Jefferson is ashamed. Jefferson is laureled. Jefferson is evergreen. Bee is consular. Bee is ashamed. Bee is laureled. Bee is evergreen. Julianna is consular. Julianna is ashamed. Julianna is impossible. Julianna is nauseated. Julianna is laureled. Julianna is evergreen. Burgess is impossible. Kind people are assistant. If someone is ashamed and assistant then they are nauseated. Young, laureled people are impossible. Burgess is evergreen.", "logic": "\nAssistant(jefferson)\nConsular(jefferson)\nAshamed(jefferson)\nLaureled(jefferson)\nEvergreen(jefferson)\nConsular(bee)\nAshamed(bee)\nLaureled(bee)\nEvergreen(bee)\nConsular(julianna)\nAshamed(julianna)\nImpossible(julianna)\nNauseated(julianna)\nLaureled(julianna)\nEvergreen(julianna)\nImpossible(burgess)\nforall x (Ashamed(x) -> Assistant(x))\nforall x (Ashamed(x) and Assistant(x) -> Nauseated(x))\nforall x (Evergreen(x) and Laureled(x) -> Impossible(x))\n\nEvergreen(burgess)\n\nEvergreen(burgess) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Kora is lxxxi. Kora is grotesque. Kora is couthie. Kora is fleshy. Kora is manichaean. Goldarina is grotesque. Goldarina is couthie. Goldarina is fleshy. Goldarina is manichaean. Inglebert is grotesque. Inglebert is couthie. Inglebert is unrhythmic. Inglebert is lengthways. Inglebert is fleshy. Inglebert is manichaean. Maire is unrhythmic. Kind people are lxxxi. If someone is couthie and lxxxi then they are lengthways. Young, fleshy people are unrhythmic. Maire is not couthie.", "logic": "\nLxxxi(kora)\nGrotesque(kora)\nCouthie(kora)\nFleshy(kora)\nManichaean(kora)\nGrotesque(goldarina)\nCouthie(goldarina)\nFleshy(goldarina)\nManichaean(goldarina)\nGrotesque(inglebert)\nCouthie(inglebert)\nUnrhythmic(inglebert)\nLengthways(inglebert)\nFleshy(inglebert)\nManichaean(inglebert)\nUnrhythmic(maire)\nforall x (Couthie(x) -> Lxxxi(x))\nforall x (Couthie(x) and Lxxxi(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Manichaean(x) and Fleshy(x) -> Unrhythmic(x))\n\nnot Couthie(maire)\n\nnot Couthie(maire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Rozelle is crowned. Rozelle is gloved. Rozelle is oddish. Rozelle is tunisian. Rozelle is illegal. Madelle is gloved. Madelle is oddish. Madelle is tunisian. Madelle is illegal. Kevina is gloved. Kevina is oddish. Kevina is fiendish. Kevina is dexterous. Kevina is tunisian. Kevina is illegal. Aggy is fiendish. Kind people are crowned. If someone is oddish and crowned then they are dexterous. Young, tunisian people are fiendish. Aggy is gloved.", "logic": "\nCrowned(rozelle)\nGloved(rozelle)\nOddish(rozelle)\nTunisian(rozelle)\nIllegal(rozelle)\nGloved(madelle)\nOddish(madelle)\nTunisian(madelle)\nIllegal(madelle)\nGloved(kevina)\nOddish(kevina)\nFiendish(kevina)\nDexterous(kevina)\nTunisian(kevina)\nIllegal(kevina)\nFiendish(aggy)\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Crowned(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) and Crowned(x) -> Dexterous(x))\nforall x (Illegal(x) and Tunisian(x) -> Fiendish(x))\n\nGloved(aggy)\n\nGloved(aggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2133"} {"premises": "Lane is unloved. Selma is seafaring. Tome is not tabby. Young, unloved people are mendelian. If someone is separatist then they are mendelian. If someone is seafaring then they are not bilobed. Green people are unloved. If someone is separatist and not tabby then they are not seafaring. If someone is unloved then they are separatist. Selma is seafaring.", "logic": "\nUnloved(lane)\nSeafaring(selma)\nnot Tabby(tome)\nforall x (Pained(x) and Unloved(x) -> Mendelian(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Mendelian(x))\nforall x (Seafaring(x) -> not Bilobed(x))\nforall x (Bilobed(x) -> Unloved(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) and not Tabby(x) -> not Seafaring(x))\nforall x (Unloved(x) -> Separatist(x))\n\nSeafaring(selma)\n\ntherefore Seafaring(selma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Christan is filthy. Wilona is legato. Barr is not sneaking. Young, filthy people are ruinous. If someone is sweeping then they are ruinous. If someone is legato then they are not gimbaled. Green people are filthy. If someone is sweeping and not sneaking then they are not legato. If someone is filthy then they are sweeping. Christan is not filthy.", "logic": "\nFilthy(christan)\nLegato(wilona)\nnot Sneaking(barr)\nforall x (Lighted(x) and Filthy(x) -> Ruinous(x))\nforall x (Sweeping(x) -> Ruinous(x))\nforall x (Legato(x) -> not Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Sweeping(x) and not Sneaking(x) -> not Legato(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) -> Sweeping(x))\n\nnot Filthy(christan)\n\ntherefore Filthy(christan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Nani is eastern. Lesya is obligated. Yvonne is not unfueled. Young, eastern people are sneaky. If someone is ascendent then they are sneaky. If someone is obligated then they are not tyrannous. Green people are eastern. If someone is ascendent and not unfueled then they are not obligated. If someone is eastern then they are ascendent. Lesya is not tyrannous.", "logic": "\nEastern(nani)\nObligated(lesya)\nnot Unfueled(yvonne)\nforall x (Obliterate(x) and Eastern(x) -> Sneaky(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> Sneaky(x))\nforall x (Obligated(x) -> not Tyrannous(x))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Eastern(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) and not Unfueled(x) -> not Obligated(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) -> Ascendent(x))\n\nnot Tyrannous(lesya)\n\nObligated(lesya) and forall x (Obligated(x) -> not Tyrannous(x)) -> therefore not Tyrannous(lesya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Christan is unfretted. Zandra is latent. Rollins is not sweltering. Young, unfretted people are spartan. If someone is affordable then they are spartan. If someone is latent then they are not unmilitary. Green people are unfretted. If someone is affordable and not sweltering then they are not latent. If someone is unfretted then they are affordable. Zandra is unmilitary.", "logic": "\nUnfretted(christan)\nLatent(zandra)\nnot Sweltering(rollins)\nforall x (Discrepant(x) and Unfretted(x) -> Spartan(x))\nforall x (Affordable(x) -> Spartan(x))\nforall x (Latent(x) -> not Unmilitary(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) -> Unfretted(x))\nforall x (Affordable(x) and not Sweltering(x) -> not Latent(x))\nforall x (Unfretted(x) -> Affordable(x))\n\nUnmilitary(zandra)\n\nLatent(zandra) and forall x (Latent(x) -> not Unmilitary(x)) -> therefore not Unmilitary(zandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Alecia is married. Ardath is hypnogogic. Michale is not relaxant. Young, married people are workable. If someone is howling then they are workable. If someone is hypnogogic then they are not ecdemic. Green people are married. If someone is howling and not relaxant then they are not hypnogogic. If someone is married then they are howling. Alecia is workable.", "logic": "\nMarried(alecia)\nHypnogogic(ardath)\nnot Relaxant(michale)\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Married(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Howling(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> not Ecdemic(x))\nforall x (Ecdemic(x) -> Married(x))\nforall x (Howling(x) and not Relaxant(x) -> not Hypnogogic(x))\nforall x (Married(x) -> Howling(x))\n\nWorkable(alecia)\n\nMarried(alecia) and forall x (Married(x) -> Howling(x)) -> therefore Howling(alecia) Howling(alecia) and forall x (Howling(x) -> Workable(x)) -> therefore Workable(alecia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Laura is dendritic. Auguste is nonmodern. Cordie is not petrous. Young, dendritic people are bipartisan. If someone is protrusive then they are bipartisan. If someone is nonmodern then they are not italian. Green people are dendritic. If someone is protrusive and not petrous then they are not nonmodern. If someone is dendritic then they are protrusive. Laura is not bipartisan.", "logic": "\nDendritic(laura)\nNonmodern(auguste)\nnot Petrous(cordie)\nforall x (Sober(x) and Dendritic(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Nonmodern(x) -> not Italian(x))\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Dendritic(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) and not Petrous(x) -> not Nonmodern(x))\nforall x (Dendritic(x) -> Protrusive(x))\n\nnot Bipartisan(laura)\n\nDendritic(laura) and forall x (Dendritic(x) -> Protrusive(x)) -> therefore Protrusive(laura) Protrusive(laura) and forall x (Protrusive(x) -> Bipartisan(x)) -> therefore Bipartisan(laura)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Joli is precooled. Clari is lymphatic. Lori is not fake. Young, precooled people are twelve. If someone is beltlike then they are twelve. If someone is lymphatic then they are not amenable. Green people are precooled. If someone is beltlike and not fake then they are not lymphatic. If someone is precooled then they are beltlike. Clari is not beltlike.", "logic": "\nPrecooled(joli)\nLymphatic(clari)\nnot Fake(lori)\nforall x (Lilac(x) and Precooled(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Beltlike(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Lymphatic(x) -> not Amenable(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Precooled(x))\nforall x (Beltlike(x) and not Fake(x) -> not Lymphatic(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) -> Beltlike(x))\n\nnot Beltlike(clari)\n\nforall x (Precooled(x) -> Beltlike(x)) <- forall x (Amenable(x) -> Precooled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Vonny is taupe. Ravi is dianoetic. Mirilla is not manlike. Young, taupe people are cogged. If someone is bulimic then they are cogged. If someone is dianoetic then they are not dense. Green people are taupe. If someone is bulimic and not manlike then they are not dianoetic. If someone is taupe then they are bulimic. Ravi is taupe.", "logic": "\nTaupe(vonny)\nDianoetic(ravi)\nnot Manlike(mirilla)\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Taupe(x) -> Cogged(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Cogged(x))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) -> not Dense(x))\nforall x (Dense(x) -> Taupe(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) and not Manlike(x) -> not Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Bulimic(x))\n\nTaupe(ravi)\n\nforall x (Dense(x) -> Taupe(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Connolly is splashed. Amalia is adjustable. Cacilie is not putative. Young, splashed people are summative. If someone is neuralgic then they are summative. If someone is adjustable then they are not satisfying. Green people are splashed. If someone is neuralgic and not putative then they are not adjustable. If someone is splashed then they are neuralgic. Cacilie is not summative.", "logic": "\nSplashed(connolly)\nAdjustable(amalia)\nnot Putative(cacilie)\nforall x (Peppy(x) and Splashed(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> not Satisfying(x))\nforall x (Satisfying(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) and not Putative(x) -> not Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Splashed(x) -> Neuralgic(x))\n\nnot Summative(cacilie)\n\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) -> Summative(x)) <- forall x (Splashed(x) -> Neuralgic(x)) <- forall x (Satisfying(x) -> Splashed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Arnold is unoiled. Ernaline is anoxic. Sandor is not precooked. Young, unoiled people are momentous. If someone is extirpable then they are momentous. If someone is anoxic then they are not unfledged. Green people are unoiled. If someone is extirpable and not precooked then they are not anoxic. If someone is unoiled then they are extirpable. Sandor is unfledged.", "logic": "\nUnoiled(arnold)\nAnoxic(ernaline)\nnot Precooked(sandor)\nforall x (Isoclinal(x) and Unoiled(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Extirpable(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Anoxic(x) -> not Unfledged(x))\nforall x (Unfledged(x) -> Unoiled(x))\nforall x (Extirpable(x) and not Precooked(x) -> not Anoxic(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> Extirpable(x))\n\nUnfledged(sandor)\n\nUnfledged(sandor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Willdon is savorless. Perla is sexless. Harrie is not empyreal. Young, savorless people are javan. If someone is anarchical then they are javan. If someone is sexless then they are not frilled. Green people are savorless. If someone is anarchical and not empyreal then they are not sexless. If someone is savorless then they are anarchical. Perla is not theistic.", "logic": "\nSavorless(willdon)\nSexless(perla)\nnot Empyreal(harrie)\nforall x (Theistic(x) and Savorless(x) -> Javan(x))\nforall x (Anarchical(x) -> Javan(x))\nforall x (Sexless(x) -> not Frilled(x))\nforall x (Frilled(x) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Anarchical(x) and not Empyreal(x) -> not Sexless(x))\nforall x (Savorless(x) -> Anarchical(x))\n\nnot Theistic(perla)\n\nnot Theistic(perla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Katalin is trabeated. Joslyn is jocular. Merlina is not edged. Young, trabeated people are clannish. If someone is dual then they are clannish. If someone is jocular then they are not alleviated. Green people are trabeated. If someone is dual and not edged then they are not jocular. If someone is trabeated then they are dual. Merlina is jocular.", "logic": "\nTrabeated(katalin)\nJocular(joslyn)\nnot Edged(merlina)\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and Trabeated(x) -> Clannish(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Clannish(x))\nforall x (Jocular(x) -> not Alleviated(x))\nforall x (Alleviated(x) -> Trabeated(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) and not Edged(x) -> not Jocular(x))\nforall x (Trabeated(x) -> Dual(x))\n\nJocular(merlina)\n\nJocular(merlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "The anette is fitted. The vergil swab the anette. The fifine reference the shoshie. The shoshie is dubious. If someone encipher the fifine and they are moody then the fifine swab the anette. If someone is fitted then they like the anette. If someone is fitted then they like the vergil. If someone reference the anette then the anette swab the vergil. If the shoshie swab the anette then the anette is unrimed. If someone encipher the shoshie and they are unrimed then they visit the fifine. The shoshie is dubious.", "logic": "\nFitted(anette)\nSwab(vergil, anette)\nReference(fifine, shoshie)\nDubious(shoshie)\nforall x (Encipher(x, fifine) and Moody(x) -> Swab(fifine, anette))\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Reference(x, anette))\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Reference(x, vergil))\nforall x (Reference(x, anette) -> Swab(anette, vergil))\nSwab(shoshie, anette) -> Unrimed(anette)\nforall x (Encipher(x, shoshie) and Unrimed(x) -> Swab(x, fifine))\n\nDubious(shoshie)\n\ntherefore Dubious(shoshie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The yance is naked. The paul dissever the yance. The paula televise the klara. The klara is hindu. If someone speckle the paula and they are burdenless then the paula dissever the yance. If someone is naked then they like the yance. If someone is naked then they like the paul. If someone televise the yance then the yance dissever the paul. If the klara dissever the yance then the yance is uttermost. If someone speckle the klara and they are uttermost then they visit the paula. The klara is not hindu.", "logic": "\nNaked(yance)\nDissever(paul, yance)\nTelevise(paula, klara)\nHindu(klara)\nforall x (Speckle(x, paula) and Burdenless(x) -> Dissever(paula, yance))\nforall x (Naked(x) -> Televise(x, yance))\nforall x (Naked(x) -> Televise(x, paul))\nforall x (Televise(x, yance) -> Dissever(yance, paul))\nDissever(klara, yance) -> Uttermost(yance)\nforall x (Speckle(x, klara) and Uttermost(x) -> Dissever(x, paula))\n\nnot Hindu(klara)\n\ntherefore Hindu(klara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The tressa is visionary. The keenan clang the tressa. The tabina evanesce the demeter. The demeter is tolerant. If someone dope the tabina and they are cracking then the tabina clang the tressa. If someone is visionary then they like the tressa. If someone is visionary then they like the keenan. If someone evanesce the tressa then the tressa clang the keenan. If the demeter clang the tressa then the tressa is emended. If someone dope the demeter and they are emended then they visit the tabina. The tressa evanesce the tressa.", "logic": "\nVisionary(tressa)\nClang(keenan, tressa)\nEvanesce(tabina, demeter)\nTolerant(demeter)\nforall x (Dope(x, tabina) and Cracking(x) -> Clang(tabina, tressa))\nforall x (Visionary(x) -> Evanesce(x, tressa))\nforall x (Visionary(x) -> Evanesce(x, keenan))\nforall x (Evanesce(x, tressa) -> Clang(tressa, keenan))\nClang(demeter, tressa) -> Emended(tressa)\nforall x (Dope(x, demeter) and Emended(x) -> Clang(x, tabina))\n\nEvanesce(tressa, tressa)\n\nVisionary(tressa) and forall x (Visionary(x) -> Evanesce(x, tressa)) -> therefore Evanesce(tressa, tressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The hashim is oddish. The naomi squint the hashim. The modesty etherize the karole. The karole is unenclosed. If someone aerate the modesty and they are xlvii then the modesty squint the hashim. If someone is oddish then they like the hashim. If someone is oddish then they like the naomi. If someone etherize the hashim then the hashim squint the naomi. If the karole squint the hashim then the hashim is dependent. If someone aerate the karole and they are dependent then they visit the modesty. The hashim does not like the hashim.", "logic": "\nOddish(hashim)\nSquint(naomi, hashim)\nEtherize(modesty, karole)\nUnenclosed(karole)\nforall x (Aerate(x, modesty) and Xlvii(x) -> Squint(modesty, hashim))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Etherize(x, hashim))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Etherize(x, naomi))\nforall x (Etherize(x, hashim) -> Squint(hashim, naomi))\nSquint(karole, hashim) -> Dependent(hashim)\nforall x (Aerate(x, karole) and Dependent(x) -> Squint(x, modesty))\n\nnot Etherize(hashim, hashim)\n\nOddish(hashim) and forall x (Oddish(x) -> Etherize(x, hashim)) -> therefore Etherize(hashim, hashim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The lusa is vestmental. The marijo misdo the lusa. The donnie hasp the meara. The meara is theist. If someone scan the donnie and they are extrovert then the donnie misdo the lusa. If someone is vestmental then they like the lusa. If someone is vestmental then they like the marijo. If someone hasp the lusa then the lusa misdo the marijo. If the meara misdo the lusa then the lusa is heliacal. If someone scan the meara and they are heliacal then they visit the donnie. The lusa misdo the marijo.", "logic": "\nVestmental(lusa)\nMisdo(marijo, lusa)\nHasp(donnie, meara)\nTheist(meara)\nforall x (Scan(x, donnie) and Extrovert(x) -> Misdo(donnie, lusa))\nforall x (Vestmental(x) -> Hasp(x, lusa))\nforall x (Vestmental(x) -> Hasp(x, marijo))\nforall x (Hasp(x, lusa) -> Misdo(lusa, marijo))\nMisdo(meara, lusa) -> Heliacal(lusa)\nforall x (Scan(x, meara) and Heliacal(x) -> Misdo(x, donnie))\n\nMisdo(lusa, marijo)\n\nVestmental(lusa) and forall x (Vestmental(x) -> Hasp(x, lusa)) -> therefore Hasp(lusa, lusa) Hasp(lusa, lusa) and forall x (Hasp(x, lusa) -> Misdo(lusa, marijo)) -> therefore Misdo(lusa, marijo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The shelley is onomastic. The doug arrogate the shelley. The augustin pollenate the ferdy. The ferdy is vitriolic. If someone scrimmage the augustin and they are overaged then the augustin arrogate the shelley. If someone is onomastic then they like the shelley. If someone is onomastic then they like the doug. If someone pollenate the shelley then the shelley arrogate the doug. If the ferdy arrogate the shelley then the shelley is himalayan. If someone scrimmage the ferdy and they are himalayan then they visit the augustin. The shelley does not visit the doug.", "logic": "\nOnomastic(shelley)\nArrogate(doug, shelley)\nPollenate(augustin, ferdy)\nVitriolic(ferdy)\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, augustin) and Overaged(x) -> Arrogate(augustin, shelley))\nforall x (Onomastic(x) -> Pollenate(x, shelley))\nforall x (Onomastic(x) -> Pollenate(x, doug))\nforall x (Pollenate(x, shelley) -> Arrogate(shelley, doug))\nArrogate(ferdy, shelley) -> Himalayan(shelley)\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, ferdy) and Himalayan(x) -> Arrogate(x, augustin))\n\nnot Arrogate(shelley, doug)\n\nOnomastic(shelley) and forall x (Onomastic(x) -> Pollenate(x, shelley)) -> therefore Pollenate(shelley, shelley) Pollenate(shelley, shelley) and forall x (Pollenate(x, shelley) -> Arrogate(shelley, doug)) -> therefore Arrogate(shelley, doug)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The danell is dripless. The montague mist the danell. The maressa manoeuvre the may. The may is untracked. If someone rededicate the maressa and they are entrenched then the maressa mist the danell. If someone is dripless then they like the danell. If someone is dripless then they like the montague. If someone manoeuvre the danell then the danell mist the montague. If the may mist the danell then the danell is vaporized. If someone rededicate the may and they are vaporized then they visit the maressa. The montague does not like the montague.", "logic": "\nDripless(danell)\nMist(montague, danell)\nManoeuvre(maressa, may)\nUntracked(may)\nforall x (Rededicate(x, maressa) and Entrenched(x) -> Mist(maressa, danell))\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Manoeuvre(x, danell))\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Manoeuvre(x, montague))\nforall x (Manoeuvre(x, danell) -> Mist(danell, montague))\nMist(may, danell) -> Vaporized(danell)\nforall x (Rededicate(x, may) and Vaporized(x) -> Mist(x, maressa))\n\nnot Manoeuvre(montague, montague)\n\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Manoeuvre(x, montague)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The tedman is homologic. The osmond focus the tedman. The les rebut the stephen. The stephen is imperfect. If someone whimper the les and they are complacent then the les focus the tedman. If someone is homologic then they like the tedman. If someone is homologic then they like the osmond. If someone rebut the tedman then the tedman focus the osmond. If the stephen focus the tedman then the tedman is expiative. If someone whimper the stephen and they are expiative then they visit the les. The les rebut the osmond.", "logic": "\nHomologic(tedman)\nFocus(osmond, tedman)\nRebut(les, stephen)\nImperfect(stephen)\nforall x (Whimper(x, les) and Complacent(x) -> Focus(les, tedman))\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Rebut(x, tedman))\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Rebut(x, osmond))\nforall x (Rebut(x, tedman) -> Focus(tedman, osmond))\nFocus(stephen, tedman) -> Expiative(tedman)\nforall x (Whimper(x, stephen) and Expiative(x) -> Focus(x, les))\n\nRebut(les, osmond)\n\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Rebut(x, osmond)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The bernelle is behavioral. The hedda snoop the bernelle. The durant martyrize the thurstan. The thurstan is captive. If someone seaplane the durant and they are troubled then the durant snoop the bernelle. If someone is behavioral then they like the bernelle. If someone is behavioral then they like the hedda. If someone martyrize the bernelle then the bernelle snoop the hedda. If the thurstan snoop the bernelle then the bernelle is endemical. If someone seaplane the thurstan and they are endemical then they visit the durant. The hedda does not visit the durant.", "logic": "\nBehavioral(bernelle)\nSnoop(hedda, bernelle)\nMartyrize(durant, thurstan)\nCaptive(thurstan)\nforall x (Seaplane(x, durant) and Troubled(x) -> Snoop(durant, bernelle))\nforall x (Behavioral(x) -> Martyrize(x, bernelle))\nforall x (Behavioral(x) -> Martyrize(x, hedda))\nforall x (Martyrize(x, bernelle) -> Snoop(bernelle, hedda))\nSnoop(thurstan, bernelle) -> Endemical(bernelle)\nforall x (Seaplane(x, thurstan) and Endemical(x) -> Snoop(x, durant))\n\nnot Snoop(hedda, durant)\n\nforall x (Seaplane(x, thurstan) and Endemical(x) -> Snoop(x, durant)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The eleonora is flexile. The robinette unwire the eleonora. The avie bean the willy. The willy is foxy. If someone excoriate the avie and they are vertical then the avie unwire the eleonora. If someone is flexile then they like the eleonora. If someone is flexile then they like the robinette. If someone bean the eleonora then the eleonora unwire the robinette. If the willy unwire the eleonora then the eleonora is canopied. If someone excoriate the willy and they are canopied then they visit the avie. The avie excoriate the eleonora.", "logic": "\nFlexile(eleonora)\nUnwire(robinette, eleonora)\nBean(avie, willy)\nFoxy(willy)\nforall x (Excoriate(x, avie) and Vertical(x) -> Unwire(avie, eleonora))\nforall x (Flexile(x) -> Bean(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Flexile(x) -> Bean(x, robinette))\nforall x (Bean(x, eleonora) -> Unwire(eleonora, robinette))\nUnwire(willy, eleonora) -> Canopied(eleonora)\nforall x (Excoriate(x, willy) and Canopied(x) -> Unwire(x, avie))\n\nExcoriate(avie, eleonora)\n\nExcoriate(avie, eleonora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The ladonna is cathedral. The stan lower the ladonna. The wade bivouac the callida. The callida is baculiform. If someone encase the wade and they are isomorphic then the wade lower the ladonna. If someone is cathedral then they like the ladonna. If someone is cathedral then they like the stan. If someone bivouac the ladonna then the ladonna lower the stan. If the callida lower the ladonna then the ladonna is volatile. If someone encase the callida and they are volatile then they visit the wade. The ladonna does not eat the callida.", "logic": "\nCathedral(ladonna)\nLower(stan, ladonna)\nBivouac(wade, callida)\nBaculiform(callida)\nforall x (Encase(x, wade) and Isomorphic(x) -> Lower(wade, ladonna))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) -> Bivouac(x, ladonna))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) -> Bivouac(x, stan))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, ladonna) -> Lower(ladonna, stan))\nLower(callida, ladonna) -> Volatile(ladonna)\nforall x (Encase(x, callida) and Volatile(x) -> Lower(x, wade))\n\nnot Encase(ladonna, callida)\n\nnot Encase(ladonna, callida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The sig is squiggly. The florrie resound the sig. The leroy attune the zacherie. The zacherie is reflexed. If someone threaten the leroy and they are steamed then the leroy resound the sig. If someone is squiggly then they like the sig. If someone is squiggly then they like the florrie. If someone attune the sig then the sig resound the florrie. If the zacherie resound the sig then the sig is modeled. If someone threaten the zacherie and they are modeled then they visit the leroy. The leroy resound the florrie.", "logic": "\nSquiggly(sig)\nResound(florrie, sig)\nAttune(leroy, zacherie)\nReflexed(zacherie)\nforall x (Threaten(x, leroy) and Steamed(x) -> Resound(leroy, sig))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Attune(x, sig))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Attune(x, florrie))\nforall x (Attune(x, sig) -> Resound(sig, florrie))\nResound(zacherie, sig) -> Modeled(sig)\nforall x (Threaten(x, zacherie) and Modeled(x) -> Resound(x, leroy))\n\nResound(leroy, florrie)\n\nResound(leroy, florrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The annadiana is not convoluted. The celine spirt the annadiana. The jenifer is unthematic. The vail categorize the annadiana. If something skip the vail then it spirt the jenifer. If something categorize the annadiana then it categorize the jenifer. If something is botryoidal and it categorize the vail then it skip the annadiana. If the jenifer is unthematic then the jenifer categorize the annadiana. If something spirt the annadiana and the annadiana is not botryoidal then the annadiana does not visit the celine. If something is botryoidal and it does not visit the annadiana then it spirt the annadiana. The jenifer is unthematic.", "logic": "\nnot Convoluted(annadiana)\nSpirt(celine, annadiana)\nUnthematic(jenifer)\nCategorize(vail, annadiana)\nforall x (Skip(x, vail) -> Spirt(x, jenifer))\nforall x (Categorize(x, annadiana) -> Categorize(x, jenifer))\nforall x (Botryoidal(x) and Categorize(x, vail) -> Skip(x, annadiana))\nUnthematic(jenifer) -> Categorize(jenifer, annadiana)\nforall x (Spirt(x, annadiana) and not Botryoidal(annadiana) -> not Categorize(annadiana, celine))\nforall x (Botryoidal(x) and not Categorize(x, annadiana) -> Spirt(x, annadiana))\n\nUnthematic(jenifer)\n\ntherefore Unthematic(jenifer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The marylin is not navigable. The ulises claxon the marylin. The adelaide is welcome. The rosamond percolate the marylin. If something unchurch the rosamond then it claxon the adelaide. If something percolate the marylin then it percolate the adelaide. If something is suasible and it percolate the rosamond then it unchurch the marylin. If the adelaide is welcome then the adelaide percolate the marylin. If something claxon the marylin and the marylin is not suasible then the marylin does not visit the ulises. If something is suasible and it does not visit the marylin then it claxon the marylin. The adelaide is not welcome.", "logic": "\nnot Navigable(marylin)\nClaxon(ulises, marylin)\nWelcome(adelaide)\nPercolate(rosamond, marylin)\nforall x (Unchurch(x, rosamond) -> Claxon(x, adelaide))\nforall x (Percolate(x, marylin) -> Percolate(x, adelaide))\nforall x (Suasible(x) and Percolate(x, rosamond) -> Unchurch(x, marylin))\nWelcome(adelaide) -> Percolate(adelaide, marylin)\nforall x (Claxon(x, marylin) and not Suasible(marylin) -> not Percolate(marylin, ulises))\nforall x (Suasible(x) and not Percolate(x, marylin) -> Claxon(x, marylin))\n\nnot Welcome(adelaide)\n\ntherefore Welcome(adelaide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The fabrianne is not hangdog. The kevina blister the fabrianne. The efram is corked. The stephi outvote the fabrianne. If something plain the stephi then it blister the efram. If something outvote the fabrianne then it outvote the efram. If something is planar and it outvote the stephi then it plain the fabrianne. If the efram is corked then the efram outvote the fabrianne. If something blister the fabrianne and the fabrianne is not planar then the fabrianne does not visit the kevina. If something is planar and it does not visit the fabrianne then it blister the fabrianne. The efram outvote the fabrianne.", "logic": "\nnot Hangdog(fabrianne)\nBlister(kevina, fabrianne)\nCorked(efram)\nOutvote(stephi, fabrianne)\nforall x (Plain(x, stephi) -> Blister(x, efram))\nforall x (Outvote(x, fabrianne) -> Outvote(x, efram))\nforall x (Planar(x) and Outvote(x, stephi) -> Plain(x, fabrianne))\nCorked(efram) -> Outvote(efram, fabrianne)\nforall x (Blister(x, fabrianne) and not Planar(fabrianne) -> not Outvote(fabrianne, kevina))\nforall x (Planar(x) and not Outvote(x, fabrianne) -> Blister(x, fabrianne))\n\nOutvote(efram, fabrianne)\n\nCorked(efram) and Corked(efram) -> Outvote(efram, fabrianne) -> therefore Outvote(efram, fabrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The layla is not cragfast. The sidoney dose the layla. The nidia is discrete. The malkah vagabond the layla. If something misgive the malkah then it dose the nidia. If something vagabond the layla then it vagabond the nidia. If something is confused and it vagabond the malkah then it misgive the layla. If the nidia is discrete then the nidia vagabond the layla. If something dose the layla and the layla is not confused then the layla does not visit the sidoney. If something is confused and it does not visit the layla then it dose the layla. The malkah does not visit the nidia.", "logic": "\nnot Cragfast(layla)\nDose(sidoney, layla)\nDiscrete(nidia)\nVagabond(malkah, layla)\nforall x (Misgive(x, malkah) -> Dose(x, nidia))\nforall x (Vagabond(x, layla) -> Vagabond(x, nidia))\nforall x (Confused(x) and Vagabond(x, malkah) -> Misgive(x, layla))\nDiscrete(nidia) -> Vagabond(nidia, layla)\nforall x (Dose(x, layla) and not Confused(layla) -> not Vagabond(layla, sidoney))\nforall x (Confused(x) and not Vagabond(x, layla) -> Dose(x, layla))\n\nnot Vagabond(malkah, nidia)\n\nVagabond(malkah, layla) and forall x (Vagabond(x, layla) -> Vagabond(x, nidia)) -> therefore Vagabond(malkah, nidia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The willette is not chaetal. The magna blare the willette. The rozanne is parched. The waine aspirate the willette. If something diffuse the waine then it blare the rozanne. If something aspirate the willette then it aspirate the rozanne. If something is vaginal and it aspirate the waine then it diffuse the willette. If the rozanne is parched then the rozanne aspirate the willette. If something blare the willette and the willette is not vaginal then the willette does not visit the magna. If something is vaginal and it does not visit the willette then it blare the willette. The rozanne aspirate the rozanne.", "logic": "\nnot Chaetal(willette)\nBlare(magna, willette)\nParched(rozanne)\nAspirate(waine, willette)\nforall x (Diffuse(x, waine) -> Blare(x, rozanne))\nforall x (Aspirate(x, willette) -> Aspirate(x, rozanne))\nforall x (Vaginal(x) and Aspirate(x, waine) -> Diffuse(x, willette))\nParched(rozanne) -> Aspirate(rozanne, willette)\nforall x (Blare(x, willette) and not Vaginal(willette) -> not Aspirate(willette, magna))\nforall x (Vaginal(x) and not Aspirate(x, willette) -> Blare(x, willette))\n\nAspirate(rozanne, rozanne)\n\nParched(rozanne) and Parched(rozanne) -> Aspirate(rozanne, willette) -> therefore Aspirate(rozanne, willette) Aspirate(rozanne, willette) and forall x (Aspirate(x, willette) -> Aspirate(x, rozanne)) -> therefore Aspirate(rozanne, rozanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The shaylyn is not proof. The tomi codify the shaylyn. The wylie is apposite. The marry apologise the shaylyn. If something retie the marry then it codify the wylie. If something apologise the shaylyn then it apologise the wylie. If something is wimpy and it apologise the marry then it retie the shaylyn. If the wylie is apposite then the wylie apologise the shaylyn. If something codify the shaylyn and the shaylyn is not wimpy then the shaylyn does not visit the tomi. If something is wimpy and it does not visit the shaylyn then it codify the shaylyn. The wylie does not visit the wylie.", "logic": "\nnot Proof(shaylyn)\nCodify(tomi, shaylyn)\nApposite(wylie)\nApologise(marry, shaylyn)\nforall x (Retie(x, marry) -> Codify(x, wylie))\nforall x (Apologise(x, shaylyn) -> Apologise(x, wylie))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) and Apologise(x, marry) -> Retie(x, shaylyn))\nApposite(wylie) -> Apologise(wylie, shaylyn)\nforall x (Codify(x, shaylyn) and not Wimpy(shaylyn) -> not Apologise(shaylyn, tomi))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) and not Apologise(x, shaylyn) -> Codify(x, shaylyn))\n\nnot Apologise(wylie, wylie)\n\nApposite(wylie) and Apposite(wylie) -> Apologise(wylie, shaylyn) -> therefore Apologise(wylie, shaylyn) Apologise(wylie, shaylyn) and forall x (Apologise(x, shaylyn) -> Apologise(x, wylie)) -> therefore Apologise(wylie, wylie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The bamby is not repressed. The melosa discontent the bamby. The herrmann is sanious. The elwood satiate the bamby. If something stand the elwood then it discontent the herrmann. If something satiate the bamby then it satiate the herrmann. If something is palliative and it satiate the elwood then it stand the bamby. If the herrmann is sanious then the herrmann satiate the bamby. If something discontent the bamby and the bamby is not palliative then the bamby does not visit the melosa. If something is palliative and it does not visit the bamby then it discontent the bamby. The bamby does not need the bamby.", "logic": "\nnot Repressed(bamby)\nDiscontent(melosa, bamby)\nSanious(herrmann)\nSatiate(elwood, bamby)\nforall x (Stand(x, elwood) -> Discontent(x, herrmann))\nforall x (Satiate(x, bamby) -> Satiate(x, herrmann))\nforall x (Palliative(x) and Satiate(x, elwood) -> Stand(x, bamby))\nSanious(herrmann) -> Satiate(herrmann, bamby)\nforall x (Discontent(x, bamby) and not Palliative(bamby) -> not Satiate(bamby, melosa))\nforall x (Palliative(x) and not Satiate(x, bamby) -> Discontent(x, bamby))\n\nnot Discontent(bamby, bamby)\n\nforall x (Palliative(x) and not Satiate(x, bamby) -> Discontent(x, bamby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The odelle is not plantar. The vaughan jolly the odelle. The cyrillus is folksy. The chadwick oxidate the odelle. If something congest the chadwick then it jolly the cyrillus. If something oxidate the odelle then it oxidate the cyrillus. If something is orbicular and it oxidate the chadwick then it congest the odelle. If the cyrillus is folksy then the cyrillus oxidate the odelle. If something jolly the odelle and the odelle is not orbicular then the odelle does not visit the vaughan. If something is orbicular and it does not visit the odelle then it jolly the odelle. The odelle oxidate the cyrillus.", "logic": "\nnot Plantar(odelle)\nJolly(vaughan, odelle)\nFolksy(cyrillus)\nOxidate(chadwick, odelle)\nforall x (Congest(x, chadwick) -> Jolly(x, cyrillus))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, odelle) -> Oxidate(x, cyrillus))\nforall x (Orbicular(x) and Oxidate(x, chadwick) -> Congest(x, odelle))\nFolksy(cyrillus) -> Oxidate(cyrillus, odelle)\nforall x (Jolly(x, odelle) and not Orbicular(odelle) -> not Oxidate(odelle, vaughan))\nforall x (Orbicular(x) and not Oxidate(x, odelle) -> Jolly(x, odelle))\n\nOxidate(odelle, cyrillus)\n\nforall x (Oxidate(x, odelle) -> Oxidate(x, cyrillus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The nance is not utility. The siouxie jackknife the nance. The tibold is misused. The adorne smelt the nance. If something catenulate the adorne then it jackknife the tibold. If something smelt the nance then it smelt the tibold. If something is midland and it smelt the adorne then it catenulate the nance. If the tibold is misused then the tibold smelt the nance. If something jackknife the nance and the nance is not midland then the nance does not visit the siouxie. If something is midland and it does not visit the nance then it jackknife the nance. The nance does not see the nance.", "logic": "\nnot Utility(nance)\nJackknife(siouxie, nance)\nMisused(tibold)\nSmelt(adorne, nance)\nforall x (Catenulate(x, adorne) -> Jackknife(x, tibold))\nforall x (Smelt(x, nance) -> Smelt(x, tibold))\nforall x (Midland(x) and Smelt(x, adorne) -> Catenulate(x, nance))\nMisused(tibold) -> Smelt(tibold, nance)\nforall x (Jackknife(x, nance) and not Midland(nance) -> not Smelt(nance, siouxie))\nforall x (Midland(x) and not Smelt(x, nance) -> Jackknife(x, nance))\n\nnot Catenulate(nance, nance)\n\nforall x (Midland(x) and Smelt(x, adorne) -> Catenulate(x, nance)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The kerianne is not scorned. The joao scull the kerianne. The patrizia is riparian. The jaquelin stop the kerianne. If something suppress the jaquelin then it scull the patrizia. If something stop the kerianne then it stop the patrizia. If something is obtrusive and it stop the jaquelin then it suppress the kerianne. If the patrizia is riparian then the patrizia stop the kerianne. If something scull the kerianne and the kerianne is not obtrusive then the kerianne does not visit the joao. If something is obtrusive and it does not visit the kerianne then it scull the kerianne. The kerianne scull the joao.", "logic": "\nnot Scorned(kerianne)\nScull(joao, kerianne)\nRiparian(patrizia)\nStop(jaquelin, kerianne)\nforall x (Suppress(x, jaquelin) -> Scull(x, patrizia))\nforall x (Stop(x, kerianne) -> Stop(x, patrizia))\nforall x (Obtrusive(x) and Stop(x, jaquelin) -> Suppress(x, kerianne))\nRiparian(patrizia) -> Stop(patrizia, kerianne)\nforall x (Scull(x, kerianne) and not Obtrusive(kerianne) -> not Stop(kerianne, joao))\nforall x (Obtrusive(x) and not Stop(x, kerianne) -> Scull(x, kerianne))\n\nScull(kerianne, joao)\n\nScull(kerianne, joao) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The kailey is not chiasmatic. The mead powderize the kailey. The mona is surmisable. The krissie aspire the kailey. If something recumb the krissie then it powderize the mona. If something aspire the kailey then it aspire the mona. If something is spiritual and it aspire the krissie then it recumb the kailey. If the mona is surmisable then the mona aspire the kailey. If something powderize the kailey and the kailey is not spiritual then the kailey does not visit the mead. If something is spiritual and it does not visit the kailey then it powderize the kailey. The mead does not visit the mead.", "logic": "\nnot Chiasmatic(kailey)\nPowderize(mead, kailey)\nSurmisable(mona)\nAspire(krissie, kailey)\nforall x (Recumb(x, krissie) -> Powderize(x, mona))\nforall x (Aspire(x, kailey) -> Aspire(x, mona))\nforall x (Spiritual(x) and Aspire(x, krissie) -> Recumb(x, kailey))\nSurmisable(mona) -> Aspire(mona, kailey)\nforall x (Powderize(x, kailey) and not Spiritual(kailey) -> not Aspire(kailey, mead))\nforall x (Spiritual(x) and not Aspire(x, kailey) -> Powderize(x, kailey))\n\nnot Aspire(mead, mead)\n\nnot Aspire(mead, mead) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "The thorn is not bourgeois. The lyda stet the thorn. The yolanthe is macabre. The michael overrefine the thorn. If something finalise the michael then it stet the yolanthe. If something overrefine the thorn then it overrefine the yolanthe. If something is admonitory and it overrefine the michael then it finalise the thorn. If the yolanthe is macabre then the yolanthe overrefine the thorn. If something stet the thorn and the thorn is not admonitory then the thorn does not visit the lyda. If something is admonitory and it does not visit the thorn then it stet the thorn. The michael finalise the michael.", "logic": "\nnot Bourgeois(thorn)\nStet(lyda, thorn)\nMacabre(yolanthe)\nOverrefine(michael, thorn)\nforall x (Finalise(x, michael) -> Stet(x, yolanthe))\nforall x (Overrefine(x, thorn) -> Overrefine(x, yolanthe))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) and Overrefine(x, michael) -> Finalise(x, thorn))\nMacabre(yolanthe) -> Overrefine(yolanthe, thorn)\nforall x (Stet(x, thorn) and not Admonitory(thorn) -> not Overrefine(thorn, lyda))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) and not Overrefine(x, thorn) -> Stet(x, thorn))\n\nFinalise(michael, michael)\n\nFinalise(michael, michael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1859"} {"premises": "Eleanore is embattled. Eleanore is lxxiii. Julianna is awed. Round, mendacious people are embattled. All embattled, awed people are brumous. All awed people are embattled. If Eleanore is awed and Eleanore is cloisonne then Eleanore is brumous. Smart people are mendacious. If someone is fouled then they are cloisonne. Big people are brumous. If Eleanore is lxxiii then Eleanore is brumous. Julianna is awed.", "logic": "\nEmbattled(eleanore)\nLxxiii(eleanore)\nAwed(julianna)\nforall x (Fouled(x) and Mendacious(x) -> Embattled(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) and Awed(x) -> Brumous(x))\nforall x (Awed(x) -> Embattled(x))\nAwed(eleanore) and Cloisonne(eleanore) -> Brumous(eleanore)\nforall x (Awed(x) -> Mendacious(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) -> Brumous(x))\nLxxiii(eleanore) -> Brumous(eleanore)\n\nAwed(julianna)\n\ntherefore Awed(julianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Stefania is waxy. Stefania is coequal. Luis is ceylonese. Round, embezzled people are waxy. All waxy, ceylonese people are sanctified. All ceylonese people are waxy. If Stefania is ceylonese and Stefania is existing then Stefania is sanctified. Smart people are embezzled. If someone is amphibious then they are existing. Big people are sanctified. If Stefania is coequal then Stefania is sanctified. Luis is not ceylonese.", "logic": "\nWaxy(stefania)\nCoequal(stefania)\nCeylonese(luis)\nforall x (Amphibious(x) and Embezzled(x) -> Waxy(x))\nforall x (Waxy(x) and Ceylonese(x) -> Sanctified(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Waxy(x))\nCeylonese(stefania) and Existing(stefania) -> Sanctified(stefania)\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Embezzled(x))\nforall x (Amphibious(x) -> Existing(x))\nforall x (Waxy(x) -> Sanctified(x))\nCoequal(stefania) -> Sanctified(stefania)\n\nnot Ceylonese(luis)\n\ntherefore Ceylonese(luis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Lamb is jobless. Lamb is olden. Mollie is original. Round, cortical people are jobless. All jobless, original people are tortuous. All original people are jobless. If Lamb is original and Lamb is home then Lamb is tortuous. Smart people are cortical. If someone is nonthermal then they are home. Big people are tortuous. If Lamb is olden then Lamb is tortuous. Mollie is cortical.", "logic": "\nJobless(lamb)\nOlden(lamb)\nOriginal(mollie)\nforall x (Nonthermal(x) and Cortical(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Jobless(x) and Original(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Original(x) -> Jobless(x))\nOriginal(lamb) and Home(lamb) -> Tortuous(lamb)\nforall x (Original(x) -> Cortical(x))\nforall x (Nonthermal(x) -> Home(x))\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nOlden(lamb) -> Tortuous(lamb)\n\nCortical(mollie)\n\nOriginal(mollie) and forall x (Original(x) -> Cortical(x)) -> therefore Cortical(mollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Frederico is malleable. Frederico is resentful. Jacinthe is obstructed. Round, taxpaying people are malleable. All malleable, obstructed people are ignited. All obstructed people are malleable. If Frederico is obstructed and Frederico is testate then Frederico is ignited. Smart people are taxpaying. If someone is baroque then they are testate. Big people are ignited. If Frederico is resentful then Frederico is ignited. Jacinthe is not malleable.", "logic": "\nMalleable(frederico)\nResentful(frederico)\nObstructed(jacinthe)\nforall x (Baroque(x) and Taxpaying(x) -> Malleable(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) and Obstructed(x) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Malleable(x))\nObstructed(frederico) and Testate(frederico) -> Ignited(frederico)\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Taxpaying(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) -> Testate(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) -> Ignited(x))\nResentful(frederico) -> Ignited(frederico)\n\nnot Malleable(jacinthe)\n\nObstructed(jacinthe) and forall x (Obstructed(x) -> Malleable(x)) -> therefore Malleable(jacinthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Arie is alto. Arie is araneidal. Hope is rewardful. Round, chaldean people are alto. All alto, rewardful people are peaked. All rewardful people are alto. If Arie is rewardful and Arie is unguided then Arie is peaked. Smart people are chaldean. If someone is ladened then they are unguided. Big people are peaked. If Arie is araneidal then Arie is peaked. Hope is peaked.", "logic": "\nAlto(arie)\nAraneidal(arie)\nRewardful(hope)\nforall x (Ladened(x) and Chaldean(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) and Rewardful(x) -> Peaked(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Alto(x))\nRewardful(arie) and Unguided(arie) -> Peaked(arie)\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Chaldean(x))\nforall x (Ladened(x) -> Unguided(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) -> Peaked(x))\nAraneidal(arie) -> Peaked(arie)\n\nPeaked(hope)\n\nRewardful(hope) and forall x (Rewardful(x) -> Alto(x)) -> therefore Alto(hope) Alto(hope) and forall x (Alto(x) -> Peaked(x)) -> therefore Peaked(hope)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Waldo is clothed. Waldo is accessible. Heath is unfed. Round, knockout people are clothed. All clothed, unfed people are captious. All unfed people are clothed. If Waldo is unfed and Waldo is catabolic then Waldo is captious. Smart people are knockout. If someone is rallying then they are catabolic. Big people are captious. If Waldo is accessible then Waldo is captious. Heath is not captious.", "logic": "\nClothed(waldo)\nAccessible(waldo)\nUnfed(heath)\nforall x (Rallying(x) and Knockout(x) -> Clothed(x))\nforall x (Clothed(x) and Unfed(x) -> Captious(x))\nforall x (Unfed(x) -> Clothed(x))\nUnfed(waldo) and Catabolic(waldo) -> Captious(waldo)\nforall x (Unfed(x) -> Knockout(x))\nforall x (Rallying(x) -> Catabolic(x))\nforall x (Clothed(x) -> Captious(x))\nAccessible(waldo) -> Captious(waldo)\n\nnot Captious(heath)\n\nUnfed(heath) and forall x (Unfed(x) -> Clothed(x)) -> therefore Clothed(heath) Clothed(heath) and forall x (Clothed(x) -> Captious(x)) -> therefore Captious(heath)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Cleland is picaresque. Cleland is sevenfold. Edwin is unpleasant. Round, peptic people are picaresque. All picaresque, unpleasant people are sensed. All unpleasant people are picaresque. If Cleland is unpleasant and Cleland is deadly then Cleland is sensed. Smart people are peptic. If someone is empathetic then they are deadly. Big people are sensed. If Cleland is sevenfold then Cleland is sensed. Edwin is not deadly.", "logic": "\nPicaresque(cleland)\nSevenfold(cleland)\nUnpleasant(edwin)\nforall x (Empathetic(x) and Peptic(x) -> Picaresque(x))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Sensed(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Picaresque(x))\nUnpleasant(cleland) and Deadly(cleland) -> Sensed(cleland)\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Deadly(x))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) -> Sensed(x))\nSevenfold(cleland) -> Sensed(cleland)\n\nnot Deadly(edwin)\n\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Deadly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Nena is ferric. Nena is plucked. Daisey is nonplused. Round, anginous people are ferric. All ferric, nonplused people are unassigned. All nonplused people are ferric. If Nena is nonplused and Nena is dogging then Nena is unassigned. Smart people are anginous. If someone is subject then they are dogging. Big people are unassigned. If Nena is plucked then Nena is unassigned. Nena is anginous.", "logic": "\nFerric(nena)\nPlucked(nena)\nNonplused(daisey)\nforall x (Subject(x) and Anginous(x) -> Ferric(x))\nforall x (Ferric(x) and Nonplused(x) -> Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Nonplused(x) -> Ferric(x))\nNonplused(nena) and Dogging(nena) -> Unassigned(nena)\nforall x (Nonplused(x) -> Anginous(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Dogging(x))\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> Unassigned(x))\nPlucked(nena) -> Unassigned(nena)\n\nAnginous(nena)\n\nforall x (Nonplused(x) -> Anginous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Jolynn is chipper. Jolynn is splanchnic. Hanan is ampullar. Round, mucoidal people are chipper. All chipper, ampullar people are weaponless. All ampullar people are chipper. If Jolynn is ampullar and Jolynn is neglected then Jolynn is weaponless. Smart people are mucoidal. If someone is deboned then they are neglected. Big people are weaponless. If Jolynn is splanchnic then Jolynn is weaponless. Jolynn is not neglected.", "logic": "\nChipper(jolynn)\nSplanchnic(jolynn)\nAmpullar(hanan)\nforall x (Deboned(x) and Mucoidal(x) -> Chipper(x))\nforall x (Chipper(x) and Ampullar(x) -> Weaponless(x))\nforall x (Ampullar(x) -> Chipper(x))\nAmpullar(jolynn) and Neglected(jolynn) -> Weaponless(jolynn)\nforall x (Ampullar(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Neglected(x))\nforall x (Chipper(x) -> Weaponless(x))\nSplanchnic(jolynn) -> Weaponless(jolynn)\n\nnot Neglected(jolynn)\n\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Neglected(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Davie is diligent. Davie is unendowed. Prasun is grubby. Round, knobbly people are diligent. All diligent, grubby people are outlawed. All grubby people are diligent. If Davie is grubby and Davie is flattened then Davie is outlawed. Smart people are knobbly. If someone is vasomotor then they are flattened. Big people are outlawed. If Davie is unendowed then Davie is outlawed. Prasun is unendowed.", "logic": "\nDiligent(davie)\nUnendowed(davie)\nGrubby(prasun)\nforall x (Vasomotor(x) and Knobbly(x) -> Diligent(x))\nforall x (Diligent(x) and Grubby(x) -> Outlawed(x))\nforall x (Grubby(x) -> Diligent(x))\nGrubby(davie) and Flattened(davie) -> Outlawed(davie)\nforall x (Grubby(x) -> Knobbly(x))\nforall x (Vasomotor(x) -> Flattened(x))\nforall x (Diligent(x) -> Outlawed(x))\nUnendowed(davie) -> Outlawed(davie)\n\nUnendowed(prasun)\n\nUnendowed(prasun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Tessi is crushing. Tessi is atypical. Morris is prongy. Round, apogametic people are crushing. All crushing, prongy people are supporting. All prongy people are crushing. If Tessi is prongy and Tessi is fizzing then Tessi is supporting. Smart people are apogametic. If someone is lamplit then they are fizzing. Big people are supporting. If Tessi is atypical then Tessi is supporting. Morris is not lamplit.", "logic": "\nCrushing(tessi)\nAtypical(tessi)\nProngy(morris)\nforall x (Lamplit(x) and Apogametic(x) -> Crushing(x))\nforall x (Crushing(x) and Prongy(x) -> Supporting(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) -> Crushing(x))\nProngy(tessi) and Fizzing(tessi) -> Supporting(tessi)\nforall x (Prongy(x) -> Apogametic(x))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> Fizzing(x))\nforall x (Crushing(x) -> Supporting(x))\nAtypical(tessi) -> Supporting(tessi)\n\nnot Lamplit(morris)\n\nnot Lamplit(morris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "Estell is surd. Estell is etiolate. Bette is preferent. Round, umptieth people are surd. All surd, preferent people are caducean. All preferent people are surd. If Estell is preferent and Estell is umbrageous then Estell is caducean. Smart people are umptieth. If someone is fetching then they are umbrageous. Big people are caducean. If Estell is etiolate then Estell is caducean. Estell is preferent.", "logic": "\nSurd(estell)\nEtiolate(estell)\nPreferent(bette)\nforall x (Fetching(x) and Umptieth(x) -> Surd(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) and Preferent(x) -> Caducean(x))\nforall x (Preferent(x) -> Surd(x))\nPreferent(estell) and Umbrageous(estell) -> Caducean(estell)\nforall x (Preferent(x) -> Umptieth(x))\nforall x (Fetching(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) -> Caducean(x))\nEtiolate(estell) -> Caducean(estell)\n\nPreferent(estell)\n\nPreferent(estell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2152"} {"premises": "The evey does not eat the marcello. The evey does not see the phip. The evey trance the calli. The evey trance the marcello. The calli desire the phip. The calli is umbilical. The marcello does not eat the evey. The marcello trance the calli. The phip desire the calli. The phip does not see the marcello. If the phip whitewash the evey then the phip whitewash the marcello. If someone desire the evey then they visit the phip. If someone whitewash the calli and they visit the evey then the calli is umbilical. If the marcello is zionist then the marcello desire the evey. If someone trance the calli then the calli desire the evey. If someone is australian and they eat the phip then the phip whitewash the calli. If someone trance the evey then the evey does not eat the marcello. If someone is australian and they do not eat the evey then the evey does not see the marcello. The evey trance the calli.", "logic": "\nnot Desire(evey, marcello)\nnot Whitewash(evey, phip)\nTrance(evey, calli)\nTrance(evey, marcello)\nDesire(calli, phip)\nUmbilical(calli)\nnot Desire(marcello, evey)\nTrance(marcello, calli)\nDesire(phip, calli)\nnot Whitewash(phip, marcello)\nWhitewash(phip, evey) -> Whitewash(phip, marcello)\nforall x (Desire(x, evey) -> Trance(x, phip))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, calli) and Trance(x, evey) -> Umbilical(calli))\nZionist(marcello) -> Desire(marcello, evey)\nforall x (Trance(x, calli) -> Desire(calli, evey))\nforall x (Australian(x) and Desire(x, phip) -> Whitewash(phip, calli))\nforall x (Trance(x, evey) -> not Desire(evey, marcello))\nforall x (Australian(x) and not Desire(x, evey) -> not Whitewash(evey, marcello))\n\nTrance(evey, calli)\n\ntherefore Trance(evey, calli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The raynard does not eat the nelle. The raynard does not see the silvanus. The raynard sizz the estrella. The raynard sizz the nelle. The estrella bell the silvanus. The estrella is unsaid. The nelle does not eat the raynard. The nelle sizz the estrella. The silvanus bell the estrella. The silvanus does not see the nelle. If the silvanus reappear the raynard then the silvanus reappear the nelle. If someone bell the raynard then they visit the silvanus. If someone reappear the estrella and they visit the raynard then the estrella is unsaid. If the nelle is discreet then the nelle bell the raynard. If someone sizz the estrella then the estrella bell the raynard. If someone is infeasible and they eat the silvanus then the silvanus reappear the estrella. If someone sizz the raynard then the raynard does not eat the nelle. If someone is infeasible and they do not eat the raynard then the raynard does not see the nelle. The raynard bell the nelle.", "logic": "\nnot Bell(raynard, nelle)\nnot Reappear(raynard, silvanus)\nSizz(raynard, estrella)\nSizz(raynard, nelle)\nBell(estrella, silvanus)\nUnsaid(estrella)\nnot Bell(nelle, raynard)\nSizz(nelle, estrella)\nBell(silvanus, estrella)\nnot Reappear(silvanus, nelle)\nReappear(silvanus, raynard) -> Reappear(silvanus, nelle)\nforall x (Bell(x, raynard) -> Sizz(x, silvanus))\nforall x (Reappear(x, estrella) and Sizz(x, raynard) -> Unsaid(estrella))\nDiscreet(nelle) -> Bell(nelle, raynard)\nforall x (Sizz(x, estrella) -> Bell(estrella, raynard))\nforall x (Infeasible(x) and Bell(x, silvanus) -> Reappear(silvanus, estrella))\nforall x (Sizz(x, raynard) -> not Bell(raynard, nelle))\nforall x (Infeasible(x) and not Bell(x, raynard) -> not Reappear(raynard, nelle))\n\nBell(raynard, nelle)\n\ntherefore not Bell(raynard, nelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The forbes does not eat the leslie. The forbes does not see the bartolemo. The forbes triple the timothee. The forbes triple the leslie. The timothee transfer the bartolemo. The timothee is sequined. The leslie does not eat the forbes. The leslie triple the timothee. The bartolemo transfer the timothee. The bartolemo does not see the leslie. If the bartolemo improvise the forbes then the bartolemo improvise the leslie. If someone transfer the forbes then they visit the bartolemo. If someone improvise the timothee and they visit the forbes then the timothee is sequined. If the leslie is kashmiri then the leslie transfer the forbes. If someone triple the timothee then the timothee transfer the forbes. If someone is violent and they eat the bartolemo then the bartolemo improvise the timothee. If someone triple the forbes then the forbes does not eat the leslie. If someone is violent and they do not eat the forbes then the forbes does not see the leslie. The timothee transfer the forbes.", "logic": "\nnot Transfer(forbes, leslie)\nnot Improvise(forbes, bartolemo)\nTriple(forbes, timothee)\nTriple(forbes, leslie)\nTransfer(timothee, bartolemo)\nSequined(timothee)\nnot Transfer(leslie, forbes)\nTriple(leslie, timothee)\nTransfer(bartolemo, timothee)\nnot Improvise(bartolemo, leslie)\nImprovise(bartolemo, forbes) -> Improvise(bartolemo, leslie)\nforall x (Transfer(x, forbes) -> Triple(x, bartolemo))\nforall x (Improvise(x, timothee) and Triple(x, forbes) -> Sequined(timothee))\nKashmiri(leslie) -> Transfer(leslie, forbes)\nforall x (Triple(x, timothee) -> Transfer(timothee, forbes))\nforall x (Violent(x) and Transfer(x, bartolemo) -> Improvise(bartolemo, timothee))\nforall x (Triple(x, forbes) -> not Transfer(forbes, leslie))\nforall x (Violent(x) and not Transfer(x, forbes) -> not Improvise(forbes, leslie))\n\nTransfer(timothee, forbes)\n\nTriple(forbes, timothee) and forall x (Triple(x, timothee) -> Transfer(timothee, forbes)) -> therefore Transfer(timothee, forbes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The ellissa does not eat the parrnell. The ellissa does not see the emory. The ellissa immobilise the oralie. The ellissa immobilise the parrnell. The oralie waffle the emory. The oralie is subacute. The parrnell does not eat the ellissa. The parrnell immobilise the oralie. The emory waffle the oralie. The emory does not see the parrnell. If the emory effloresce the ellissa then the emory effloresce the parrnell. If someone waffle the ellissa then they visit the emory. If someone effloresce the oralie and they visit the ellissa then the oralie is subacute. If the parrnell is noted then the parrnell waffle the ellissa. If someone immobilise the oralie then the oralie waffle the ellissa. If someone is autonomic and they eat the emory then the emory effloresce the oralie. If someone immobilise the ellissa then the ellissa does not eat the parrnell. If someone is autonomic and they do not eat the ellissa then the ellissa does not see the parrnell. The oralie does not eat the ellissa.", "logic": "\nnot Waffle(ellissa, parrnell)\nnot Effloresce(ellissa, emory)\nImmobilise(ellissa, oralie)\nImmobilise(ellissa, parrnell)\nWaffle(oralie, emory)\nSubacute(oralie)\nnot Waffle(parrnell, ellissa)\nImmobilise(parrnell, oralie)\nWaffle(emory, oralie)\nnot Effloresce(emory, parrnell)\nEffloresce(emory, ellissa) -> Effloresce(emory, parrnell)\nforall x (Waffle(x, ellissa) -> Immobilise(x, emory))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, oralie) and Immobilise(x, ellissa) -> Subacute(oralie))\nNoted(parrnell) -> Waffle(parrnell, ellissa)\nforall x (Immobilise(x, oralie) -> Waffle(oralie, ellissa))\nforall x (Autonomic(x) and Waffle(x, emory) -> Effloresce(emory, oralie))\nforall x (Immobilise(x, ellissa) -> not Waffle(ellissa, parrnell))\nforall x (Autonomic(x) and not Waffle(x, ellissa) -> not Effloresce(ellissa, parrnell))\n\nnot Waffle(oralie, ellissa)\n\nImmobilise(ellissa, oralie) and forall x (Immobilise(x, oralie) -> Waffle(oralie, ellissa)) -> therefore Waffle(oralie, ellissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The joyann does not eat the novelia. The joyann does not see the lance. The joyann gawk the micheal. The joyann gawk the novelia. The micheal exhort the lance. The micheal is homing. The novelia does not eat the joyann. The novelia gawk the micheal. The lance exhort the micheal. The lance does not see the novelia. If the lance skid the joyann then the lance skid the novelia. If someone exhort the joyann then they visit the lance. If someone skid the micheal and they visit the joyann then the micheal is homing. If the novelia is sigmoid then the novelia exhort the joyann. If someone gawk the micheal then the micheal exhort the joyann. If someone is avellan and they eat the lance then the lance skid the micheal. If someone gawk the joyann then the joyann does not eat the novelia. If someone is avellan and they do not eat the joyann then the joyann does not see the novelia. The micheal gawk the lance.", "logic": "\nnot Exhort(joyann, novelia)\nnot Skid(joyann, lance)\nGawk(joyann, micheal)\nGawk(joyann, novelia)\nExhort(micheal, lance)\nHoming(micheal)\nnot Exhort(novelia, joyann)\nGawk(novelia, micheal)\nExhort(lance, micheal)\nnot Skid(lance, novelia)\nSkid(lance, joyann) -> Skid(lance, novelia)\nforall x (Exhort(x, joyann) -> Gawk(x, lance))\nforall x (Skid(x, micheal) and Gawk(x, joyann) -> Homing(micheal))\nSigmoid(novelia) -> Exhort(novelia, joyann)\nforall x (Gawk(x, micheal) -> Exhort(micheal, joyann))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and Exhort(x, lance) -> Skid(lance, micheal))\nforall x (Gawk(x, joyann) -> not Exhort(joyann, novelia))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and not Exhort(x, joyann) -> not Skid(joyann, novelia))\n\nGawk(micheal, lance)\n\nGawk(joyann, micheal) and forall x (Gawk(x, micheal) -> Exhort(micheal, joyann)) -> therefore Exhort(micheal, joyann) Exhort(micheal, joyann) and forall x (Exhort(x, joyann) -> Gawk(x, lance)) -> therefore Gawk(micheal, lance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The brenda does not eat the geraldine. The brenda does not see the adolph. The brenda aromatize the stanley. The brenda aromatize the geraldine. The stanley belabour the adolph. The stanley is discarded. The geraldine does not eat the brenda. The geraldine aromatize the stanley. The adolph belabour the stanley. The adolph does not see the geraldine. If the adolph stink the brenda then the adolph stink the geraldine. If someone belabour the brenda then they visit the adolph. If someone stink the stanley and they visit the brenda then the stanley is discarded. If the geraldine is hitless then the geraldine belabour the brenda. If someone aromatize the stanley then the stanley belabour the brenda. If someone is concurrent and they eat the adolph then the adolph stink the stanley. If someone aromatize the brenda then the brenda does not eat the geraldine. If someone is concurrent and they do not eat the brenda then the brenda does not see the geraldine. The stanley does not visit the adolph.", "logic": "\nnot Belabour(brenda, geraldine)\nnot Stink(brenda, adolph)\nAromatize(brenda, stanley)\nAromatize(brenda, geraldine)\nBelabour(stanley, adolph)\nDiscarded(stanley)\nnot Belabour(geraldine, brenda)\nAromatize(geraldine, stanley)\nBelabour(adolph, stanley)\nnot Stink(adolph, geraldine)\nStink(adolph, brenda) -> Stink(adolph, geraldine)\nforall x (Belabour(x, brenda) -> Aromatize(x, adolph))\nforall x (Stink(x, stanley) and Aromatize(x, brenda) -> Discarded(stanley))\nHitless(geraldine) -> Belabour(geraldine, brenda)\nforall x (Aromatize(x, stanley) -> Belabour(stanley, brenda))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) and Belabour(x, adolph) -> Stink(adolph, stanley))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, brenda) -> not Belabour(brenda, geraldine))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) and not Belabour(x, brenda) -> not Stink(brenda, geraldine))\n\nnot Aromatize(stanley, adolph)\n\nAromatize(brenda, stanley) and forall x (Aromatize(x, stanley) -> Belabour(stanley, brenda)) -> therefore Belabour(stanley, brenda) Belabour(stanley, brenda) and forall x (Belabour(x, brenda) -> Aromatize(x, adolph)) -> therefore Aromatize(stanley, adolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The torrey does not eat the martica. The torrey does not see the shandee. The torrey auction the constance. The torrey auction the martica. The constance hype the shandee. The constance is metrical. The martica does not eat the torrey. The martica auction the constance. The shandee hype the constance. The shandee does not see the martica. If the shandee sporulate the torrey then the shandee sporulate the martica. If someone hype the torrey then they visit the shandee. If someone sporulate the constance and they visit the torrey then the constance is metrical. If the martica is solitary then the martica hype the torrey. If someone auction the constance then the constance hype the torrey. If someone is unlawful and they eat the shandee then the shandee sporulate the constance. If someone auction the torrey then the torrey does not eat the martica. If someone is unlawful and they do not eat the torrey then the torrey does not see the martica. The shandee does not see the constance.", "logic": "\nnot Hype(torrey, martica)\nnot Sporulate(torrey, shandee)\nAuction(torrey, constance)\nAuction(torrey, martica)\nHype(constance, shandee)\nMetrical(constance)\nnot Hype(martica, torrey)\nAuction(martica, constance)\nHype(shandee, constance)\nnot Sporulate(shandee, martica)\nSporulate(shandee, torrey) -> Sporulate(shandee, martica)\nforall x (Hype(x, torrey) -> Auction(x, shandee))\nforall x (Sporulate(x, constance) and Auction(x, torrey) -> Metrical(constance))\nSolitary(martica) -> Hype(martica, torrey)\nforall x (Auction(x, constance) -> Hype(constance, torrey))\nforall x (Unlawful(x) and Hype(x, shandee) -> Sporulate(shandee, constance))\nforall x (Auction(x, torrey) -> not Hype(torrey, martica))\nforall x (Unlawful(x) and not Hype(x, torrey) -> not Sporulate(torrey, martica))\n\nnot Sporulate(shandee, constance)\n\nforall x (Unlawful(x) and Hype(x, shandee) -> Sporulate(shandee, constance)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The selinda does not eat the moise. The selinda does not see the yancy. The selinda fold the valerye. The selinda fold the moise. The valerye intromit the yancy. The valerye is unheeding. The moise does not eat the selinda. The moise fold the valerye. The yancy intromit the valerye. The yancy does not see the moise. If the yancy cowhide the selinda then the yancy cowhide the moise. If someone intromit the selinda then they visit the yancy. If someone cowhide the valerye and they visit the selinda then the valerye is unheeding. If the moise is semestrial then the moise intromit the selinda. If someone fold the valerye then the valerye intromit the selinda. If someone is untuneful and they eat the yancy then the yancy cowhide the valerye. If someone fold the selinda then the selinda does not eat the moise. If someone is untuneful and they do not eat the selinda then the selinda does not see the moise. The selinda fold the yancy.", "logic": "\nnot Intromit(selinda, moise)\nnot Cowhide(selinda, yancy)\nFold(selinda, valerye)\nFold(selinda, moise)\nIntromit(valerye, yancy)\nUnheeding(valerye)\nnot Intromit(moise, selinda)\nFold(moise, valerye)\nIntromit(yancy, valerye)\nnot Cowhide(yancy, moise)\nCowhide(yancy, selinda) -> Cowhide(yancy, moise)\nforall x (Intromit(x, selinda) -> Fold(x, yancy))\nforall x (Cowhide(x, valerye) and Fold(x, selinda) -> Unheeding(valerye))\nSemestrial(moise) -> Intromit(moise, selinda)\nforall x (Fold(x, valerye) -> Intromit(valerye, selinda))\nforall x (Untuneful(x) and Intromit(x, yancy) -> Cowhide(yancy, valerye))\nforall x (Fold(x, selinda) -> not Intromit(selinda, moise))\nforall x (Untuneful(x) and not Intromit(x, selinda) -> not Cowhide(selinda, moise))\n\nFold(selinda, yancy)\n\nforall x (Intromit(x, selinda) -> Fold(x, yancy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The wesley does not eat the jeni. The wesley does not see the daffi. The wesley flutter the elizabeth. The wesley flutter the jeni. The elizabeth pinkify the daffi. The elizabeth is stretched. The jeni does not eat the wesley. The jeni flutter the elizabeth. The daffi pinkify the elizabeth. The daffi does not see the jeni. If the daffi refute the wesley then the daffi refute the jeni. If someone pinkify the wesley then they visit the daffi. If someone refute the elizabeth and they visit the wesley then the elizabeth is stretched. If the jeni is uninviting then the jeni pinkify the wesley. If someone flutter the elizabeth then the elizabeth pinkify the wesley. If someone is persian and they eat the daffi then the daffi refute the elizabeth. If someone flutter the wesley then the wesley does not eat the jeni. If someone is persian and they do not eat the wesley then the wesley does not see the jeni. The daffi does not visit the daffi.", "logic": "\nnot Pinkify(wesley, jeni)\nnot Refute(wesley, daffi)\nFlutter(wesley, elizabeth)\nFlutter(wesley, jeni)\nPinkify(elizabeth, daffi)\nStretched(elizabeth)\nnot Pinkify(jeni, wesley)\nFlutter(jeni, elizabeth)\nPinkify(daffi, elizabeth)\nnot Refute(daffi, jeni)\nRefute(daffi, wesley) -> Refute(daffi, jeni)\nforall x (Pinkify(x, wesley) -> Flutter(x, daffi))\nforall x (Refute(x, elizabeth) and Flutter(x, wesley) -> Stretched(elizabeth))\nUninviting(jeni) -> Pinkify(jeni, wesley)\nforall x (Flutter(x, elizabeth) -> Pinkify(elizabeth, wesley))\nforall x (Persian(x) and Pinkify(x, daffi) -> Refute(daffi, elizabeth))\nforall x (Flutter(x, wesley) -> not Pinkify(wesley, jeni))\nforall x (Persian(x) and not Pinkify(x, wesley) -> not Refute(wesley, jeni))\n\nnot Flutter(daffi, daffi)\n\nforall x (Pinkify(x, wesley) -> Flutter(x, daffi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The cam does not eat the marrissa. The cam does not see the xena. The cam toggle the carolin. The cam toggle the marrissa. The carolin fondle the xena. The carolin is porcine. The marrissa does not eat the cam. The marrissa toggle the carolin. The xena fondle the carolin. The xena does not see the marrissa. If the xena cheapen the cam then the xena cheapen the marrissa. If someone fondle the cam then they visit the xena. If someone cheapen the carolin and they visit the cam then the carolin is porcine. If the marrissa is landed then the marrissa fondle the cam. If someone toggle the carolin then the carolin fondle the cam. If someone is bothersome and they eat the xena then the xena cheapen the carolin. If someone toggle the cam then the cam does not eat the marrissa. If someone is bothersome and they do not eat the cam then the cam does not see the marrissa. The carolin cheapen the carolin.", "logic": "\nnot Fondle(cam, marrissa)\nnot Cheapen(cam, xena)\nToggle(cam, carolin)\nToggle(cam, marrissa)\nFondle(carolin, xena)\nPorcine(carolin)\nnot Fondle(marrissa, cam)\nToggle(marrissa, carolin)\nFondle(xena, carolin)\nnot Cheapen(xena, marrissa)\nCheapen(xena, cam) -> Cheapen(xena, marrissa)\nforall x (Fondle(x, cam) -> Toggle(x, xena))\nforall x (Cheapen(x, carolin) and Toggle(x, cam) -> Porcine(carolin))\nLanded(marrissa) -> Fondle(marrissa, cam)\nforall x (Toggle(x, carolin) -> Fondle(carolin, cam))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) and Fondle(x, xena) -> Cheapen(xena, carolin))\nforall x (Toggle(x, cam) -> not Fondle(cam, marrissa))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) and not Fondle(x, cam) -> not Cheapen(cam, marrissa))\n\nCheapen(carolin, carolin)\n\nCheapen(carolin, carolin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The loralee does not eat the geralda. The loralee does not see the tatiania. The loralee prospect the obie. The loralee prospect the geralda. The obie sprint the tatiania. The obie is hypertonic. The geralda does not eat the loralee. The geralda prospect the obie. The tatiania sprint the obie. The tatiania does not see the geralda. If the tatiania queen the loralee then the tatiania queen the geralda. If someone sprint the loralee then they visit the tatiania. If someone queen the obie and they visit the loralee then the obie is hypertonic. If the geralda is insensible then the geralda sprint the loralee. If someone prospect the obie then the obie sprint the loralee. If someone is indusial and they eat the tatiania then the tatiania queen the obie. If someone prospect the loralee then the loralee does not eat the geralda. If someone is indusial and they do not eat the loralee then the loralee does not see the geralda. The geralda does not eat the tatiania.", "logic": "\nnot Sprint(loralee, geralda)\nnot Queen(loralee, tatiania)\nProspect(loralee, obie)\nProspect(loralee, geralda)\nSprint(obie, tatiania)\nHypertonic(obie)\nnot Sprint(geralda, loralee)\nProspect(geralda, obie)\nSprint(tatiania, obie)\nnot Queen(tatiania, geralda)\nQueen(tatiania, loralee) -> Queen(tatiania, geralda)\nforall x (Sprint(x, loralee) -> Prospect(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Queen(x, obie) and Prospect(x, loralee) -> Hypertonic(obie))\nInsensible(geralda) -> Sprint(geralda, loralee)\nforall x (Prospect(x, obie) -> Sprint(obie, loralee))\nforall x (Indusial(x) and Sprint(x, tatiania) -> Queen(tatiania, obie))\nforall x (Prospect(x, loralee) -> not Sprint(loralee, geralda))\nforall x (Indusial(x) and not Sprint(x, loralee) -> not Queen(loralee, geralda))\n\nnot Sprint(geralda, tatiania)\n\nnot Sprint(geralda, tatiania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The hildy does not eat the ilsa. The hildy does not see the mohamad. The hildy refracture the kennedy. The hildy refracture the ilsa. The kennedy husk the mohamad. The kennedy is slapstick. The ilsa does not eat the hildy. The ilsa refracture the kennedy. The mohamad husk the kennedy. The mohamad does not see the ilsa. If the mohamad slice the hildy then the mohamad slice the ilsa. If someone husk the hildy then they visit the mohamad. If someone slice the kennedy and they visit the hildy then the kennedy is slapstick. If the ilsa is clubbish then the ilsa husk the hildy. If someone refracture the kennedy then the kennedy husk the hildy. If someone is unpermed and they eat the mohamad then the mohamad slice the kennedy. If someone refracture the hildy then the hildy does not eat the ilsa. If someone is unpermed and they do not eat the hildy then the hildy does not see the ilsa. The ilsa is unpermed.", "logic": "\nnot Husk(hildy, ilsa)\nnot Slice(hildy, mohamad)\nRefracture(hildy, kennedy)\nRefracture(hildy, ilsa)\nHusk(kennedy, mohamad)\nSlapstick(kennedy)\nnot Husk(ilsa, hildy)\nRefracture(ilsa, kennedy)\nHusk(mohamad, kennedy)\nnot Slice(mohamad, ilsa)\nSlice(mohamad, hildy) -> Slice(mohamad, ilsa)\nforall x (Husk(x, hildy) -> Refracture(x, mohamad))\nforall x (Slice(x, kennedy) and Refracture(x, hildy) -> Slapstick(kennedy))\nClubbish(ilsa) -> Husk(ilsa, hildy)\nforall x (Refracture(x, kennedy) -> Husk(kennedy, hildy))\nforall x (Unpermed(x) and Husk(x, mohamad) -> Slice(mohamad, kennedy))\nforall x (Refracture(x, hildy) -> not Husk(hildy, ilsa))\nforall x (Unpermed(x) and not Husk(x, hildy) -> not Slice(hildy, ilsa))\n\nUnpermed(ilsa)\n\nUnpermed(ilsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-74"} {"premises": "The pierson cark the tiebold. The pierson is packaged. The pierson rate the tiebold. The raye is synchronal. The tiebold rehash the silvano. The silvano rehash the pierson. The silvano rehash the tiebold. If something rate the pierson and it is packaged then the pierson does not need the tiebold. If something is iridic then it cark the pierson. If something rehash the pierson then the pierson is iridic. If something rehash the raye then the raye rehash the pierson. If something rehash the tiebold and it is not catabatic then the tiebold rate the pierson. If the pierson does not need the tiebold then the tiebold rehash the silvano. The pierson rate the tiebold.", "logic": "\nCark(pierson, tiebold)\nPackaged(pierson)\nRate(pierson, tiebold)\nSynchronal(raye)\nRehash(tiebold, silvano)\nRehash(silvano, pierson)\nRehash(silvano, tiebold)\nforall x (Rate(x, pierson) and Packaged(x) -> not Rate(pierson, tiebold))\nforall x (Iridic(x) -> Cark(x, pierson))\nforall x (Rehash(x, pierson) -> Iridic(pierson))\nforall x (Rehash(x, raye) -> Rehash(raye, pierson))\nforall x (Rehash(x, tiebold) and not Catabatic(x) -> Rate(tiebold, pierson))\nnot Rate(pierson, tiebold) -> Rehash(tiebold, silvano)\n\nRate(pierson, tiebold)\n\ntherefore Rate(pierson, tiebold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The tab seat the philbert. The tab is acquired. The tab ration the philbert. The nicolle is hysterical. The philbert alight the meir. The meir alight the tab. The meir alight the philbert. If something ration the tab and it is acquired then the tab does not need the philbert. If something is subaquatic then it seat the tab. If something alight the tab then the tab is subaquatic. If something alight the nicolle then the nicolle alight the tab. If something alight the philbert and it is not fungous then the philbert ration the tab. If the tab does not need the philbert then the philbert alight the meir. The nicolle is not hysterical.", "logic": "\nSeat(tab, philbert)\nAcquired(tab)\nRation(tab, philbert)\nHysterical(nicolle)\nAlight(philbert, meir)\nAlight(meir, tab)\nAlight(meir, philbert)\nforall x (Ration(x, tab) and Acquired(x) -> not Ration(tab, philbert))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Seat(x, tab))\nforall x (Alight(x, tab) -> Subaquatic(tab))\nforall x (Alight(x, nicolle) -> Alight(nicolle, tab))\nforall x (Alight(x, philbert) and not Fungous(x) -> Ration(philbert, tab))\nnot Ration(tab, philbert) -> Alight(philbert, meir)\n\nnot Hysterical(nicolle)\n\ntherefore Hysterical(nicolle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The hillary twit the quincey. The hillary is cupric. The hillary homogenize the quincey. The kalman is adoring. The quincey perform the jeanna. The jeanna perform the hillary. The jeanna perform the quincey. If something homogenize the hillary and it is cupric then the hillary does not need the quincey. If something is anisogamic then it twit the hillary. If something perform the hillary then the hillary is anisogamic. If something perform the kalman then the kalman perform the hillary. If something perform the quincey and it is not skinless then the quincey homogenize the hillary. If the hillary does not need the quincey then the quincey perform the jeanna. The hillary is anisogamic.", "logic": "\nTwit(hillary, quincey)\nCupric(hillary)\nHomogenize(hillary, quincey)\nAdoring(kalman)\nPerform(quincey, jeanna)\nPerform(jeanna, hillary)\nPerform(jeanna, quincey)\nforall x (Homogenize(x, hillary) and Cupric(x) -> not Homogenize(hillary, quincey))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Twit(x, hillary))\nforall x (Perform(x, hillary) -> Anisogamic(hillary))\nforall x (Perform(x, kalman) -> Perform(kalman, hillary))\nforall x (Perform(x, quincey) and not Skinless(x) -> Homogenize(quincey, hillary))\nnot Homogenize(hillary, quincey) -> Perform(quincey, jeanna)\n\nAnisogamic(hillary)\n\nPerform(jeanna, hillary) and forall x (Perform(x, hillary) -> Anisogamic(hillary)) -> therefore Anisogamic(hillary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The lida suds the esmaria. The lida is soggy. The lida face the esmaria. The cammi is unredeemed. The esmaria coordinate the donielle. The donielle coordinate the lida. The donielle coordinate the esmaria. If something face the lida and it is soggy then the lida does not need the esmaria. If something is albuminous then it suds the lida. If something coordinate the lida then the lida is albuminous. If something coordinate the cammi then the cammi coordinate the lida. If something coordinate the esmaria and it is not afferent then the esmaria face the lida. If the lida does not need the esmaria then the esmaria coordinate the donielle. The lida is not albuminous.", "logic": "\nSuds(lida, esmaria)\nSoggy(lida)\nFace(lida, esmaria)\nUnredeemed(cammi)\nCoordinate(esmaria, donielle)\nCoordinate(donielle, lida)\nCoordinate(donielle, esmaria)\nforall x (Face(x, lida) and Soggy(x) -> not Face(lida, esmaria))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) -> Suds(x, lida))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, lida) -> Albuminous(lida))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, cammi) -> Coordinate(cammi, lida))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, esmaria) and not Afferent(x) -> Face(esmaria, lida))\nnot Face(lida, esmaria) -> Coordinate(esmaria, donielle)\n\nnot Albuminous(lida)\n\nCoordinate(donielle, lida) and forall x (Coordinate(x, lida) -> Albuminous(lida)) -> therefore Albuminous(lida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The pacifica foolproof the devonne. The pacifica is floccose. The pacifica devitalize the devonne. The winona is final. The devonne plait the locke. The locke plait the pacifica. The locke plait the devonne. If something devitalize the pacifica and it is floccose then the pacifica does not need the devonne. If something is porcine then it foolproof the pacifica. If something plait the pacifica then the pacifica is porcine. If something plait the winona then the winona plait the pacifica. If something plait the devonne and it is not hormonal then the devonne devitalize the pacifica. If the pacifica does not need the devonne then the devonne plait the locke. The pacifica foolproof the pacifica.", "logic": "\nFoolproof(pacifica, devonne)\nFloccose(pacifica)\nDevitalize(pacifica, devonne)\nFinal(winona)\nPlait(devonne, locke)\nPlait(locke, pacifica)\nPlait(locke, devonne)\nforall x (Devitalize(x, pacifica) and Floccose(x) -> not Devitalize(pacifica, devonne))\nforall x (Porcine(x) -> Foolproof(x, pacifica))\nforall x (Plait(x, pacifica) -> Porcine(pacifica))\nforall x (Plait(x, winona) -> Plait(winona, pacifica))\nforall x (Plait(x, devonne) and not Hormonal(x) -> Devitalize(devonne, pacifica))\nnot Devitalize(pacifica, devonne) -> Plait(devonne, locke)\n\nFoolproof(pacifica, pacifica)\n\nPlait(locke, pacifica) and forall x (Plait(x, pacifica) -> Porcine(pacifica)) -> therefore Porcine(pacifica) Porcine(pacifica) and forall x (Porcine(x) -> Foolproof(x, pacifica)) -> therefore Foolproof(pacifica, pacifica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The cortese purvey the debbra. The cortese is proto. The cortese betide the debbra. The genovera is operating. The debbra vindicate the benson. The benson vindicate the cortese. The benson vindicate the debbra. If something betide the cortese and it is proto then the cortese does not need the debbra. If something is complex then it purvey the cortese. If something vindicate the cortese then the cortese is complex. If something vindicate the genovera then the genovera vindicate the cortese. If something vindicate the debbra and it is not soviet then the debbra betide the cortese. If the cortese does not need the debbra then the debbra vindicate the benson. The cortese does not chase the cortese.", "logic": "\nPurvey(cortese, debbra)\nProto(cortese)\nBetide(cortese, debbra)\nOperating(genovera)\nVindicate(debbra, benson)\nVindicate(benson, cortese)\nVindicate(benson, debbra)\nforall x (Betide(x, cortese) and Proto(x) -> not Betide(cortese, debbra))\nforall x (Complex(x) -> Purvey(x, cortese))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, cortese) -> Complex(cortese))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, genovera) -> Vindicate(genovera, cortese))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, debbra) and not Soviet(x) -> Betide(debbra, cortese))\nnot Betide(cortese, debbra) -> Vindicate(debbra, benson)\n\nnot Purvey(cortese, cortese)\n\nVindicate(benson, cortese) and forall x (Vindicate(x, cortese) -> Complex(cortese)) -> therefore Complex(cortese) Complex(cortese) and forall x (Complex(x) -> Purvey(x, cortese)) -> therefore Purvey(cortese, cortese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The corri potter the loralee. The corri is clammy. The corri appear the loralee. The nanci is asleep. The loralee indispose the lea. The lea indispose the corri. The lea indispose the loralee. If something appear the corri and it is clammy then the corri does not need the loralee. If something is crucial then it potter the corri. If something indispose the corri then the corri is crucial. If something indispose the nanci then the nanci indispose the corri. If something indispose the loralee and it is not aplacental then the loralee appear the corri. If the corri does not need the loralee then the loralee indispose the lea. The nanci does not chase the corri.", "logic": "\nPotter(corri, loralee)\nClammy(corri)\nAppear(corri, loralee)\nAsleep(nanci)\nIndispose(loralee, lea)\nIndispose(lea, corri)\nIndispose(lea, loralee)\nforall x (Appear(x, corri) and Clammy(x) -> not Appear(corri, loralee))\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Potter(x, corri))\nforall x (Indispose(x, corri) -> Crucial(corri))\nforall x (Indispose(x, nanci) -> Indispose(nanci, corri))\nforall x (Indispose(x, loralee) and not Aplacental(x) -> Appear(loralee, corri))\nnot Appear(corri, loralee) -> Indispose(loralee, lea)\n\nnot Potter(nanci, corri)\n\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Potter(x, corri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The glynn squire the gabriele. The glynn is mucose. The glynn flame the gabriele. The kathleen is irritable. The gabriele cycle the reiko. The reiko cycle the glynn. The reiko cycle the gabriele. If something flame the glynn and it is mucose then the glynn does not need the gabriele. If something is goosy then it squire the glynn. If something cycle the glynn then the glynn is goosy. If something cycle the kathleen then the kathleen cycle the glynn. If something cycle the gabriele and it is not colorfast then the gabriele flame the glynn. If the glynn does not need the gabriele then the gabriele cycle the reiko. The gabriele flame the glynn.", "logic": "\nSquire(glynn, gabriele)\nMucose(glynn)\nFlame(glynn, gabriele)\nIrritable(kathleen)\nCycle(gabriele, reiko)\nCycle(reiko, glynn)\nCycle(reiko, gabriele)\nforall x (Flame(x, glynn) and Mucose(x) -> not Flame(glynn, gabriele))\nforall x (Goosy(x) -> Squire(x, glynn))\nforall x (Cycle(x, glynn) -> Goosy(glynn))\nforall x (Cycle(x, kathleen) -> Cycle(kathleen, glynn))\nforall x (Cycle(x, gabriele) and not Colorfast(x) -> Flame(gabriele, glynn))\nnot Flame(glynn, gabriele) -> Cycle(gabriele, reiko)\n\nFlame(gabriele, glynn)\n\nforall x (Cycle(x, gabriele) and not Colorfast(x) -> Flame(gabriele, glynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The caria qualify the lamb. The caria is tawny. The caria slosh the lamb. The federico is vulturous. The lamb deputize the hasheem. The hasheem deputize the caria. The hasheem deputize the lamb. If something slosh the caria and it is tawny then the caria does not need the lamb. If something is rumansh then it qualify the caria. If something deputize the caria then the caria is rumansh. If something deputize the federico then the federico deputize the caria. If something deputize the lamb and it is not unalert then the lamb slosh the caria. If the caria does not need the lamb then the lamb deputize the hasheem. The hasheem does not chase the caria.", "logic": "\nQualify(caria, lamb)\nTawny(caria)\nSlosh(caria, lamb)\nVulturous(federico)\nDeputize(lamb, hasheem)\nDeputize(hasheem, caria)\nDeputize(hasheem, lamb)\nforall x (Slosh(x, caria) and Tawny(x) -> not Slosh(caria, lamb))\nforall x (Rumansh(x) -> Qualify(x, caria))\nforall x (Deputize(x, caria) -> Rumansh(caria))\nforall x (Deputize(x, federico) -> Deputize(federico, caria))\nforall x (Deputize(x, lamb) and not Unalert(x) -> Slosh(lamb, caria))\nnot Slosh(caria, lamb) -> Deputize(lamb, hasheem)\n\nnot Qualify(hasheem, caria)\n\nforall x (Rumansh(x) -> Qualify(x, caria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The amaleta filigree the tildy. The amaleta is feverous. The amaleta deplete the tildy. The tammi is rumbling. The tildy crouch the adeline. The adeline crouch the amaleta. The adeline crouch the tildy. If something deplete the amaleta and it is feverous then the amaleta does not need the tildy. If something is hellish then it filigree the amaleta. If something crouch the amaleta then the amaleta is hellish. If something crouch the tammi then the tammi crouch the amaleta. If something crouch the tildy and it is not lobate then the tildy deplete the amaleta. If the amaleta does not need the tildy then the tildy crouch the adeline. The amaleta is lobate.", "logic": "\nFiligree(amaleta, tildy)\nFeverous(amaleta)\nDeplete(amaleta, tildy)\nRumbling(tammi)\nCrouch(tildy, adeline)\nCrouch(adeline, amaleta)\nCrouch(adeline, tildy)\nforall x (Deplete(x, amaleta) and Feverous(x) -> not Deplete(amaleta, tildy))\nforall x (Hellish(x) -> Filigree(x, amaleta))\nforall x (Crouch(x, amaleta) -> Hellish(amaleta))\nforall x (Crouch(x, tammi) -> Crouch(tammi, amaleta))\nforall x (Crouch(x, tildy) and not Lobate(x) -> Deplete(tildy, amaleta))\nnot Deplete(amaleta, tildy) -> Crouch(tildy, adeline)\n\nLobate(amaleta)\n\nLobate(amaleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The amandie gaze the stinky. The amandie is couthie. The amandie feminize the stinky. The blondelle is confusing. The stinky vowelise the vallie. The vallie vowelise the amandie. The vallie vowelise the stinky. If something feminize the amandie and it is couthie then the amandie does not need the stinky. If something is uncertain then it gaze the amandie. If something vowelise the amandie then the amandie is uncertain. If something vowelise the blondelle then the blondelle vowelise the amandie. If something vowelise the stinky and it is not cacodylic then the stinky feminize the amandie. If the amandie does not need the stinky then the stinky vowelise the vallie. The vallie is not couthie.", "logic": "\nGaze(amandie, stinky)\nCouthie(amandie)\nFeminize(amandie, stinky)\nConfusing(blondelle)\nVowelise(stinky, vallie)\nVowelise(vallie, amandie)\nVowelise(vallie, stinky)\nforall x (Feminize(x, amandie) and Couthie(x) -> not Feminize(amandie, stinky))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Gaze(x, amandie))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, amandie) -> Uncertain(amandie))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, blondelle) -> Vowelise(blondelle, amandie))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, stinky) and not Cacodylic(x) -> Feminize(stinky, amandie))\nnot Feminize(amandie, stinky) -> Vowelise(stinky, vallie)\n\nnot Couthie(vallie)\n\nnot Couthie(vallie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The roger chap the heinrich. The roger is sanguinary. The roger recast the heinrich. The ximenez is quavering. The heinrich beleaguer the kirsten. The kirsten beleaguer the roger. The kirsten beleaguer the heinrich. If something recast the roger and it is sanguinary then the roger does not need the heinrich. If something is threatened then it chap the roger. If something beleaguer the roger then the roger is threatened. If something beleaguer the ximenez then the ximenez beleaguer the roger. If something beleaguer the heinrich and it is not wavelike then the heinrich recast the roger. If the roger does not need the heinrich then the heinrich beleaguer the kirsten. The ximenez recast the kirsten.", "logic": "\nChap(roger, heinrich)\nSanguinary(roger)\nRecast(roger, heinrich)\nQuavering(ximenez)\nBeleaguer(heinrich, kirsten)\nBeleaguer(kirsten, roger)\nBeleaguer(kirsten, heinrich)\nforall x (Recast(x, roger) and Sanguinary(x) -> not Recast(roger, heinrich))\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Chap(x, roger))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, roger) -> Threatened(roger))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, ximenez) -> Beleaguer(ximenez, roger))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, heinrich) and not Wavelike(x) -> Recast(heinrich, roger))\nnot Recast(roger, heinrich) -> Beleaguer(heinrich, kirsten)\n\nRecast(ximenez, kirsten)\n\nRecast(ximenez, kirsten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1303"} {"premises": "The garrot is jubilant. The garrot encrypt the hadley. The garrot encrypt the jonis. The hadley drip the garrot. The hadley drip the jonis. The hadley is rugged. The hadley is glary. The hadley is corrected. The hadley is jubilant. The hadley urbanise the garrot. The hadley does not need the jonis. The hadley does not visit the garrot. The hadley does not visit the jonis. The jonis drip the hadley. The jonis is jubilant. The jonis urbanise the hadley. If someone drip the jonis and they do not need the jonis then they are taken. If someone drip the hadley then they do not chase the garrot. If someone is taken and they need the garrot then the garrot does not chase the jonis. The jonis is jubilant.", "logic": "\nJubilant(garrot)\nEncrypt(garrot, hadley)\nEncrypt(garrot, jonis)\nDrip(hadley, garrot)\nDrip(hadley, jonis)\nRugged(hadley)\nGlary(hadley)\nCorrected(hadley)\nJubilant(hadley)\nUrbanise(hadley, garrot)\nnot Urbanise(hadley, jonis)\nnot Encrypt(hadley, garrot)\nnot Encrypt(hadley, jonis)\nDrip(jonis, hadley)\nJubilant(jonis)\nUrbanise(jonis, hadley)\nforall x (Drip(x, jonis) and not Urbanise(x, jonis) -> Taken(x))\nforall x (Drip(x, hadley) -> not Drip(x, garrot))\nforall x (Taken(x) and Urbanise(x, garrot) -> not Drip(garrot, jonis))\n\nJubilant(jonis)\n\ntherefore Jubilant(jonis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The eddie is chichi. The eddie twit the norris. The eddie twit the mirabella. The norris pander the eddie. The norris pander the mirabella. The norris is pareve. The norris is reserved. The norris is hairless. The norris is chichi. The norris sympathise the eddie. The norris does not need the mirabella. The norris does not visit the eddie. The norris does not visit the mirabella. The mirabella pander the norris. The mirabella is chichi. The mirabella sympathise the norris. If someone pander the mirabella and they do not need the mirabella then they are sour. If someone pander the norris then they do not chase the eddie. If someone is sour and they need the eddie then the eddie does not chase the mirabella. The norris is not reserved.", "logic": "\nChichi(eddie)\nTwit(eddie, norris)\nTwit(eddie, mirabella)\nPander(norris, eddie)\nPander(norris, mirabella)\nPareve(norris)\nReserved(norris)\nHairless(norris)\nChichi(norris)\nSympathise(norris, eddie)\nnot Sympathise(norris, mirabella)\nnot Twit(norris, eddie)\nnot Twit(norris, mirabella)\nPander(mirabella, norris)\nChichi(mirabella)\nSympathise(mirabella, norris)\nforall x (Pander(x, mirabella) and not Sympathise(x, mirabella) -> Sour(x))\nforall x (Pander(x, norris) -> not Pander(x, eddie))\nforall x (Sour(x) and Sympathise(x, eddie) -> not Pander(eddie, mirabella))\n\nnot Reserved(norris)\n\ntherefore Reserved(norris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The sari is revised. The sari brominate the madelin. The sari brominate the rockwell. The madelin glue the sari. The madelin glue the rockwell. The madelin is semisweet. The madelin is congealed. The madelin is efficient. The madelin is revised. The madelin intone the sari. The madelin does not need the rockwell. The madelin does not visit the sari. The madelin does not visit the rockwell. The rockwell glue the madelin. The rockwell is revised. The rockwell intone the madelin. If someone glue the rockwell and they do not need the rockwell then they are ladened. If someone glue the madelin then they do not chase the sari. If someone is ladened and they need the sari then the sari does not chase the rockwell. The rockwell does not chase the sari.", "logic": "\nRevised(sari)\nBrominate(sari, madelin)\nBrominate(sari, rockwell)\nGlue(madelin, sari)\nGlue(madelin, rockwell)\nSemisweet(madelin)\nCongealed(madelin)\nEfficient(madelin)\nRevised(madelin)\nIntone(madelin, sari)\nnot Intone(madelin, rockwell)\nnot Brominate(madelin, sari)\nnot Brominate(madelin, rockwell)\nGlue(rockwell, madelin)\nRevised(rockwell)\nIntone(rockwell, madelin)\nforall x (Glue(x, rockwell) and not Intone(x, rockwell) -> Ladened(x))\nforall x (Glue(x, madelin) -> not Glue(x, sari))\nforall x (Ladened(x) and Intone(x, sari) -> not Glue(sari, rockwell))\n\nnot Glue(rockwell, sari)\n\nGlue(rockwell, madelin) and forall x (Glue(x, madelin) -> not Glue(x, sari)) -> therefore not Glue(rockwell, sari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The erwin is tubular. The erwin syncopate the remy. The erwin syncopate the godfry. The remy postdate the erwin. The remy postdate the godfry. The remy is supernal. The remy is quartan. The remy is cleansing. The remy is tubular. The remy saunter the erwin. The remy does not need the godfry. The remy does not visit the erwin. The remy does not visit the godfry. The godfry postdate the remy. The godfry is tubular. The godfry saunter the remy. If someone postdate the godfry and they do not need the godfry then they are stigmatic. If someone postdate the remy then they do not chase the erwin. If someone is stigmatic and they need the erwin then the erwin does not chase the godfry. The godfry postdate the erwin.", "logic": "\nTubular(erwin)\nSyncopate(erwin, remy)\nSyncopate(erwin, godfry)\nPostdate(remy, erwin)\nPostdate(remy, godfry)\nSupernal(remy)\nQuartan(remy)\nCleansing(remy)\nTubular(remy)\nSaunter(remy, erwin)\nnot Saunter(remy, godfry)\nnot Syncopate(remy, erwin)\nnot Syncopate(remy, godfry)\nPostdate(godfry, remy)\nTubular(godfry)\nSaunter(godfry, remy)\nforall x (Postdate(x, godfry) and not Saunter(x, godfry) -> Stigmatic(x))\nforall x (Postdate(x, remy) -> not Postdate(x, erwin))\nforall x (Stigmatic(x) and Saunter(x, erwin) -> not Postdate(erwin, godfry))\n\nPostdate(godfry, erwin)\n\nPostdate(godfry, remy) and forall x (Postdate(x, remy) -> not Postdate(x, erwin)) -> therefore not Postdate(godfry, erwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The ragnar is silvern. The ragnar appose the warden. The ragnar appose the levin. The warden filiate the ragnar. The warden filiate the levin. The warden is bursal. The warden is diabolic. The warden is sensate. The warden is silvern. The warden guarantee the ragnar. The warden does not need the levin. The warden does not visit the ragnar. The warden does not visit the levin. The levin filiate the warden. The levin is silvern. The levin guarantee the warden. If someone filiate the levin and they do not need the levin then they are birken. If someone filiate the warden then they do not chase the ragnar. If someone is birken and they need the ragnar then the ragnar does not chase the levin. The ragnar does not chase the levin.", "logic": "\nSilvern(ragnar)\nAppose(ragnar, warden)\nAppose(ragnar, levin)\nFiliate(warden, ragnar)\nFiliate(warden, levin)\nBursal(warden)\nDiabolic(warden)\nSensate(warden)\nSilvern(warden)\nGuarantee(warden, ragnar)\nnot Guarantee(warden, levin)\nnot Appose(warden, ragnar)\nnot Appose(warden, levin)\nFiliate(levin, warden)\nSilvern(levin)\nGuarantee(levin, warden)\nforall x (Filiate(x, levin) and not Guarantee(x, levin) -> Birken(x))\nforall x (Filiate(x, warden) -> not Filiate(x, ragnar))\nforall x (Birken(x) and Guarantee(x, ragnar) -> not Filiate(ragnar, levin))\n\nnot Filiate(ragnar, levin)\n\nFiliate(warden, levin) and not Guarantee(warden, levin) and forall x (Filiate(x, levin) and not Guarantee(x, levin) -> Birken(x)) -> therefore Birken(warden) Birken(warden) and Guarantee(warden, ragnar) and forall x (Birken(x) and Guarantee(x, ragnar) -> not Filiate(ragnar, levin)) -> therefore not Filiate(ragnar, levin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The andre is envious. The andre succour the sibilla. The andre succour the lacy. The sibilla reinstall the andre. The sibilla reinstall the lacy. The sibilla is moot. The sibilla is aquiline. The sibilla is stupendous. The sibilla is envious. The sibilla quake the andre. The sibilla does not need the lacy. The sibilla does not visit the andre. The sibilla does not visit the lacy. The lacy reinstall the sibilla. The lacy is envious. The lacy quake the sibilla. If someone reinstall the lacy and they do not need the lacy then they are recent. If someone reinstall the sibilla then they do not chase the andre. If someone is recent and they need the andre then the andre does not chase the lacy. The andre reinstall the lacy.", "logic": "\nEnvious(andre)\nSuccour(andre, sibilla)\nSuccour(andre, lacy)\nReinstall(sibilla, andre)\nReinstall(sibilla, lacy)\nMoot(sibilla)\nAquiline(sibilla)\nStupendous(sibilla)\nEnvious(sibilla)\nQuake(sibilla, andre)\nnot Quake(sibilla, lacy)\nnot Succour(sibilla, andre)\nnot Succour(sibilla, lacy)\nReinstall(lacy, sibilla)\nEnvious(lacy)\nQuake(lacy, sibilla)\nforall x (Reinstall(x, lacy) and not Quake(x, lacy) -> Recent(x))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, sibilla) -> not Reinstall(x, andre))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Quake(x, andre) -> not Reinstall(andre, lacy))\n\nReinstall(andre, lacy)\n\nReinstall(sibilla, lacy) and not Quake(sibilla, lacy) and forall x (Reinstall(x, lacy) and not Quake(x, lacy) -> Recent(x)) -> therefore Recent(sibilla) Recent(sibilla) and Quake(sibilla, andre) and forall x (Recent(x) and Quake(x, andre) -> not Reinstall(andre, lacy)) -> therefore not Reinstall(andre, lacy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The cristal is limacoid. The cristal verbify the ann. The cristal verbify the kass. The ann empale the cristal. The ann empale the kass. The ann is reedlike. The ann is antheral. The ann is unarmed. The ann is limacoid. The ann break the cristal. The ann does not need the kass. The ann does not visit the cristal. The ann does not visit the kass. The kass empale the ann. The kass is limacoid. The kass break the ann. If someone empale the kass and they do not need the kass then they are juridic. If someone empale the ann then they do not chase the cristal. If someone is juridic and they need the cristal then the cristal does not chase the kass. The cristal is not juridic.", "logic": "\nLimacoid(cristal)\nVerbify(cristal, ann)\nVerbify(cristal, kass)\nEmpale(ann, cristal)\nEmpale(ann, kass)\nReedlike(ann)\nAntheral(ann)\nUnarmed(ann)\nLimacoid(ann)\nBreak(ann, cristal)\nnot Break(ann, kass)\nnot Verbify(ann, cristal)\nnot Verbify(ann, kass)\nEmpale(kass, ann)\nLimacoid(kass)\nBreak(kass, ann)\nforall x (Empale(x, kass) and not Break(x, kass) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Empale(x, ann) -> not Empale(x, cristal))\nforall x (Juridic(x) and Break(x, cristal) -> not Empale(cristal, kass))\n\nnot Juridic(cristal)\n\nforall x (Empale(x, kass) and not Break(x, kass) -> Juridic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The wilton is listless. The wilton postdate the markus. The wilton postdate the benjie. The markus mambo the wilton. The markus mambo the benjie. The markus is groping. The markus is equivocal. The markus is single. The markus is listless. The markus gelatinize the wilton. The markus does not need the benjie. The markus does not visit the wilton. The markus does not visit the benjie. The benjie mambo the markus. The benjie is listless. The benjie gelatinize the markus. If someone mambo the benjie and they do not need the benjie then they are anagogic. If someone mambo the markus then they do not chase the wilton. If someone is anagogic and they need the wilton then the wilton does not chase the benjie. The benjie is anagogic.", "logic": "\nListless(wilton)\nPostdate(wilton, markus)\nPostdate(wilton, benjie)\nMambo(markus, wilton)\nMambo(markus, benjie)\nGroping(markus)\nEquivocal(markus)\nSingle(markus)\nListless(markus)\nGelatinize(markus, wilton)\nnot Gelatinize(markus, benjie)\nnot Postdate(markus, wilton)\nnot Postdate(markus, benjie)\nMambo(benjie, markus)\nListless(benjie)\nGelatinize(benjie, markus)\nforall x (Mambo(x, benjie) and not Gelatinize(x, benjie) -> Anagogic(x))\nforall x (Mambo(x, markus) -> not Mambo(x, wilton))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Gelatinize(x, wilton) -> not Mambo(wilton, benjie))\n\nAnagogic(benjie)\n\nforall x (Mambo(x, benjie) and not Gelatinize(x, benjie) -> Anagogic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The hartley is munificent. The hartley semaphore the rhianna. The hartley semaphore the hailey. The rhianna alkalize the hartley. The rhianna alkalize the hailey. The rhianna is peptic. The rhianna is scurrilous. The rhianna is current. The rhianna is munificent. The rhianna mortgage the hartley. The rhianna does not need the hailey. The rhianna does not visit the hartley. The rhianna does not visit the hailey. The hailey alkalize the rhianna. The hailey is munificent. The hailey mortgage the rhianna. If someone alkalize the hailey and they do not need the hailey then they are lxxvii. If someone alkalize the rhianna then they do not chase the hartley. If someone is lxxvii and they need the hartley then the hartley does not chase the hailey. The hartley does not need the hailey.", "logic": "\nMunificent(hartley)\nSemaphore(hartley, rhianna)\nSemaphore(hartley, hailey)\nAlkalize(rhianna, hartley)\nAlkalize(rhianna, hailey)\nPeptic(rhianna)\nScurrilous(rhianna)\nCurrent(rhianna)\nMunificent(rhianna)\nMortgage(rhianna, hartley)\nnot Mortgage(rhianna, hailey)\nnot Semaphore(rhianna, hartley)\nnot Semaphore(rhianna, hailey)\nAlkalize(hailey, rhianna)\nMunificent(hailey)\nMortgage(hailey, rhianna)\nforall x (Alkalize(x, hailey) and not Mortgage(x, hailey) -> Lxxvii(x))\nforall x (Alkalize(x, rhianna) -> not Alkalize(x, hartley))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) and Mortgage(x, hartley) -> not Alkalize(hartley, hailey))\n\nnot Mortgage(hartley, hailey)\n\nnot Mortgage(hartley, hailey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The marti is intriguing. The marti botanize the betty. The marti botanize the errol. The betty verse the marti. The betty verse the errol. The betty is undersized. The betty is placeable. The betty is covered. The betty is intriguing. The betty harm the marti. The betty does not need the errol. The betty does not visit the marti. The betty does not visit the errol. The errol verse the betty. The errol is intriguing. The errol harm the betty. If someone verse the errol and they do not need the errol then they are shouldered. If someone verse the betty then they do not chase the marti. If someone is shouldered and they need the marti then the marti does not chase the errol. The marti harm the betty.", "logic": "\nIntriguing(marti)\nBotanize(marti, betty)\nBotanize(marti, errol)\nVerse(betty, marti)\nVerse(betty, errol)\nUndersized(betty)\nPlaceable(betty)\nCovered(betty)\nIntriguing(betty)\nHarm(betty, marti)\nnot Harm(betty, errol)\nnot Botanize(betty, marti)\nnot Botanize(betty, errol)\nVerse(errol, betty)\nIntriguing(errol)\nHarm(errol, betty)\nforall x (Verse(x, errol) and not Harm(x, errol) -> Shouldered(x))\nforall x (Verse(x, betty) -> not Verse(x, marti))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Harm(x, marti) -> not Verse(marti, errol))\n\nHarm(marti, betty)\n\nHarm(marti, betty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The rodrique is complete. The rodrique picture the cher. The rodrique picture the dollie. The cher disclose the rodrique. The cher disclose the dollie. The cher is qabalistic. The cher is renascent. The cher is gummed. The cher is complete. The cher finagle the rodrique. The cher does not need the dollie. The cher does not visit the rodrique. The cher does not visit the dollie. The dollie disclose the cher. The dollie is complete. The dollie finagle the cher. If someone disclose the dollie and they do not need the dollie then they are untuneful. If someone disclose the cher then they do not chase the rodrique. If someone is untuneful and they need the rodrique then the rodrique does not chase the dollie. The dollie does not visit the dollie.", "logic": "\nComplete(rodrique)\nPicture(rodrique, cher)\nPicture(rodrique, dollie)\nDisclose(cher, rodrique)\nDisclose(cher, dollie)\nQabalistic(cher)\nRenascent(cher)\nGummed(cher)\nComplete(cher)\nFinagle(cher, rodrique)\nnot Finagle(cher, dollie)\nnot Picture(cher, rodrique)\nnot Picture(cher, dollie)\nDisclose(dollie, cher)\nComplete(dollie)\nFinagle(dollie, cher)\nforall x (Disclose(x, dollie) and not Finagle(x, dollie) -> Untuneful(x))\nforall x (Disclose(x, cher) -> not Disclose(x, rodrique))\nforall x (Untuneful(x) and Finagle(x, rodrique) -> not Disclose(rodrique, dollie))\n\nnot Picture(dollie, dollie)\n\nnot Picture(dollie, dollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The mufinella is cretaceous. The mufinella trumpet the silvanus. The mufinella trumpet the johny. The silvanus rhapsodize the mufinella. The silvanus rhapsodize the johny. The silvanus is ramshackle. The silvanus is carbolated. The silvanus is sixpenny. The silvanus is cretaceous. The silvanus anathemize the mufinella. The silvanus does not need the johny. The silvanus does not visit the mufinella. The silvanus does not visit the johny. The johny rhapsodize the silvanus. The johny is cretaceous. The johny anathemize the silvanus. If someone rhapsodize the johny and they do not need the johny then they are positional. If someone rhapsodize the silvanus then they do not chase the mufinella. If someone is positional and they need the mufinella then the mufinella does not chase the johny. The silvanus anathemize the silvanus.", "logic": "\nCretaceous(mufinella)\nTrumpet(mufinella, silvanus)\nTrumpet(mufinella, johny)\nRhapsodize(silvanus, mufinella)\nRhapsodize(silvanus, johny)\nRamshackle(silvanus)\nCarbolated(silvanus)\nSixpenny(silvanus)\nCretaceous(silvanus)\nAnathemize(silvanus, mufinella)\nnot Anathemize(silvanus, johny)\nnot Trumpet(silvanus, mufinella)\nnot Trumpet(silvanus, johny)\nRhapsodize(johny, silvanus)\nCretaceous(johny)\nAnathemize(johny, silvanus)\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, johny) and not Anathemize(x, johny) -> Positional(x))\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, silvanus) -> not Rhapsodize(x, mufinella))\nforall x (Positional(x) and Anathemize(x, mufinella) -> not Rhapsodize(mufinella, johny))\n\nAnathemize(silvanus, silvanus)\n\nAnathemize(silvanus, silvanus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1774"} {"premises": "The joli is kashmiri. The joli write the guillaume. The joli write the sigmund. The joli does not need the guillaume. The guillaume does not chase the joli. The guillaume ready the sigmund. The guillaume is ripe. The guillaume write the joli. The guillaume does not like the sigmund. The guillaume elbow the sigmund. The sigmund ready the guillaume. The sigmund is not kashmiri. The sigmund is ripe. The sigmund write the joli. The sigmund write the guillaume. If someone write the sigmund and they are kashmiri then the sigmund is not kashmiri. If someone ready the joli then the joli does not chase the guillaume. If someone elbow the joli and the joli does not like the sigmund then they are not kashmiri. If someone elbow the guillaume then the guillaume is not kashmiri. If someone is tarry and ripe then they need the joli. If someone is ripe and they chase the guillaume then they need the guillaume. The sigmund write the guillaume.", "logic": "\nKashmiri(joli)\nWrite(joli, guillaume)\nWrite(joli, sigmund)\nnot Elbow(joli, guillaume)\nnot Ready(guillaume, joli)\nReady(guillaume, sigmund)\nRipe(guillaume)\nWrite(guillaume, joli)\nnot Write(guillaume, sigmund)\nElbow(guillaume, sigmund)\nReady(sigmund, guillaume)\nnot Kashmiri(sigmund)\nRipe(sigmund)\nWrite(sigmund, joli)\nWrite(sigmund, guillaume)\nforall x (Write(x, sigmund) and Kashmiri(x) -> not Kashmiri(sigmund))\nforall x (Ready(x, joli) -> not Ready(joli, guillaume))\nforall x (Elbow(x, joli) and not Write(joli, sigmund) -> not Kashmiri(x))\nforall x (Elbow(x, guillaume) -> not Kashmiri(guillaume))\nforall x (Tarry(x) and Ripe(x) -> Elbow(x, joli))\nforall x (Ripe(x) and Ready(x, guillaume) -> Elbow(x, guillaume))\n\nWrite(sigmund, guillaume)\n\ntherefore Write(sigmund, guillaume)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The claus is filmy. The claus abut the alberta. The claus abut the titus. The claus does not need the alberta. The alberta does not chase the claus. The alberta sonnet the titus. The alberta is passe. The alberta abut the claus. The alberta does not like the titus. The alberta sprain the titus. The titus sonnet the alberta. The titus is not filmy. The titus is passe. The titus abut the claus. The titus abut the alberta. If someone abut the titus and they are filmy then the titus is not filmy. If someone sonnet the claus then the claus does not chase the alberta. If someone sprain the claus and the claus does not like the titus then they are not filmy. If someone sprain the alberta then the alberta is not filmy. If someone is conventual and passe then they need the claus. If someone is passe and they chase the alberta then they need the alberta. The titus does not like the claus.", "logic": "\nFilmy(claus)\nAbut(claus, alberta)\nAbut(claus, titus)\nnot Sprain(claus, alberta)\nnot Sonnet(alberta, claus)\nSonnet(alberta, titus)\nPasse(alberta)\nAbut(alberta, claus)\nnot Abut(alberta, titus)\nSprain(alberta, titus)\nSonnet(titus, alberta)\nnot Filmy(titus)\nPasse(titus)\nAbut(titus, claus)\nAbut(titus, alberta)\nforall x (Abut(x, titus) and Filmy(x) -> not Filmy(titus))\nforall x (Sonnet(x, claus) -> not Sonnet(claus, alberta))\nforall x (Sprain(x, claus) and not Abut(claus, titus) -> not Filmy(x))\nforall x (Sprain(x, alberta) -> not Filmy(alberta))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and Passe(x) -> Sprain(x, claus))\nforall x (Passe(x) and Sonnet(x, alberta) -> Sprain(x, alberta))\n\nnot Abut(titus, claus)\n\ntherefore Abut(titus, claus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The hakeem is credited. The hakeem canker the jerrold. The hakeem canker the wright. The hakeem does not need the jerrold. The jerrold does not chase the hakeem. The jerrold fress the wright. The jerrold is unheated. The jerrold canker the hakeem. The jerrold does not like the wright. The jerrold hygienize the wright. The wright fress the jerrold. The wright is not credited. The wright is unheated. The wright canker the hakeem. The wright canker the jerrold. If someone canker the wright and they are credited then the wright is not credited. If someone fress the hakeem then the hakeem does not chase the jerrold. If someone hygienize the hakeem and the hakeem does not like the wright then they are not credited. If someone hygienize the jerrold then the jerrold is not credited. If someone is northerly and unheated then they need the hakeem. If someone is unheated and they chase the jerrold then they need the jerrold. The wright hygienize the jerrold.", "logic": "\nCredited(hakeem)\nCanker(hakeem, jerrold)\nCanker(hakeem, wright)\nnot Hygienize(hakeem, jerrold)\nnot Fress(jerrold, hakeem)\nFress(jerrold, wright)\nUnheated(jerrold)\nCanker(jerrold, hakeem)\nnot Canker(jerrold, wright)\nHygienize(jerrold, wright)\nFress(wright, jerrold)\nnot Credited(wright)\nUnheated(wright)\nCanker(wright, hakeem)\nCanker(wright, jerrold)\nforall x (Canker(x, wright) and Credited(x) -> not Credited(wright))\nforall x (Fress(x, hakeem) -> not Fress(hakeem, jerrold))\nforall x (Hygienize(x, hakeem) and not Canker(hakeem, wright) -> not Credited(x))\nforall x (Hygienize(x, jerrold) -> not Credited(jerrold))\nforall x (Northerly(x) and Unheated(x) -> Hygienize(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Unheated(x) and Fress(x, jerrold) -> Hygienize(x, jerrold))\n\nHygienize(wright, jerrold)\n\nUnheated(wright) and Fress(wright, jerrold) and forall x (Unheated(x) and Fress(x, jerrold) -> Hygienize(x, jerrold)) -> therefore Hygienize(wright, jerrold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The spense is unaffixed. The spense vouchsafe the rubina. The spense vouchsafe the jessamyn. The spense does not need the rubina. The rubina does not chase the spense. The rubina racket the jessamyn. The rubina is outlined. The rubina vouchsafe the spense. The rubina does not like the jessamyn. The rubina exuberate the jessamyn. The jessamyn racket the rubina. The jessamyn is not unaffixed. The jessamyn is outlined. The jessamyn vouchsafe the spense. The jessamyn vouchsafe the rubina. If someone vouchsafe the jessamyn and they are unaffixed then the jessamyn is not unaffixed. If someone racket the spense then the spense does not chase the rubina. If someone exuberate the spense and the spense does not like the jessamyn then they are not unaffixed. If someone exuberate the rubina then the rubina is not unaffixed. If someone is windup and outlined then they need the spense. If someone is outlined and they chase the rubina then they need the rubina. The jessamyn does not need the rubina.", "logic": "\nUnaffixed(spense)\nVouchsafe(spense, rubina)\nVouchsafe(spense, jessamyn)\nnot Exuberate(spense, rubina)\nnot Racket(rubina, spense)\nRacket(rubina, jessamyn)\nOutlined(rubina)\nVouchsafe(rubina, spense)\nnot Vouchsafe(rubina, jessamyn)\nExuberate(rubina, jessamyn)\nRacket(jessamyn, rubina)\nnot Unaffixed(jessamyn)\nOutlined(jessamyn)\nVouchsafe(jessamyn, spense)\nVouchsafe(jessamyn, rubina)\nforall x (Vouchsafe(x, jessamyn) and Unaffixed(x) -> not Unaffixed(jessamyn))\nforall x (Racket(x, spense) -> not Racket(spense, rubina))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, spense) and not Vouchsafe(spense, jessamyn) -> not Unaffixed(x))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, rubina) -> not Unaffixed(rubina))\nforall x (Windup(x) and Outlined(x) -> Exuberate(x, spense))\nforall x (Outlined(x) and Racket(x, rubina) -> Exuberate(x, rubina))\n\nnot Exuberate(jessamyn, rubina)\n\nOutlined(jessamyn) and Racket(jessamyn, rubina) and forall x (Outlined(x) and Racket(x, rubina) -> Exuberate(x, rubina)) -> therefore Exuberate(jessamyn, rubina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The osbourne is shortish. The osbourne burden the raphaela. The osbourne burden the min. The osbourne does not need the raphaela. The raphaela does not chase the osbourne. The raphaela spark the min. The raphaela is stagey. The raphaela burden the osbourne. The raphaela does not like the min. The raphaela adjure the min. The min spark the raphaela. The min is not shortish. The min is stagey. The min burden the osbourne. The min burden the raphaela. If someone burden the min and they are shortish then the min is not shortish. If someone spark the osbourne then the osbourne does not chase the raphaela. If someone adjure the osbourne and the osbourne does not like the min then they are not shortish. If someone adjure the raphaela then the raphaela is not shortish. If someone is palpitant and stagey then they need the osbourne. If someone is stagey and they chase the raphaela then they need the raphaela. The raphaela is not shortish.", "logic": "\nShortish(osbourne)\nBurden(osbourne, raphaela)\nBurden(osbourne, min)\nnot Adjure(osbourne, raphaela)\nnot Spark(raphaela, osbourne)\nSpark(raphaela, min)\nStagey(raphaela)\nBurden(raphaela, osbourne)\nnot Burden(raphaela, min)\nAdjure(raphaela, min)\nSpark(min, raphaela)\nnot Shortish(min)\nStagey(min)\nBurden(min, osbourne)\nBurden(min, raphaela)\nforall x (Burden(x, min) and Shortish(x) -> not Shortish(min))\nforall x (Spark(x, osbourne) -> not Spark(osbourne, raphaela))\nforall x (Adjure(x, osbourne) and not Burden(osbourne, min) -> not Shortish(x))\nforall x (Adjure(x, raphaela) -> not Shortish(raphaela))\nforall x (Palpitant(x) and Stagey(x) -> Adjure(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Stagey(x) and Spark(x, raphaela) -> Adjure(x, raphaela))\n\nnot Shortish(raphaela)\n\nStagey(min) and Spark(min, raphaela) and forall x (Stagey(x) and Spark(x, raphaela) -> Adjure(x, raphaela)) -> therefore Adjure(min, raphaela) Adjure(min, raphaela) and forall x (Adjure(x, raphaela) -> not Shortish(raphaela)) -> therefore not Shortish(raphaela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The elvin is swishy. The elvin relieve the prudy. The elvin relieve the ayn. The elvin does not need the prudy. The prudy does not chase the elvin. The prudy verse the ayn. The prudy is moneyed. The prudy relieve the elvin. The prudy does not like the ayn. The prudy marble the ayn. The ayn verse the prudy. The ayn is not swishy. The ayn is moneyed. The ayn relieve the elvin. The ayn relieve the prudy. If someone relieve the ayn and they are swishy then the ayn is not swishy. If someone verse the elvin then the elvin does not chase the prudy. If someone marble the elvin and the elvin does not like the ayn then they are not swishy. If someone marble the prudy then the prudy is not swishy. If someone is dentate and moneyed then they need the elvin. If someone is moneyed and they chase the prudy then they need the prudy. The prudy is swishy.", "logic": "\nSwishy(elvin)\nRelieve(elvin, prudy)\nRelieve(elvin, ayn)\nnot Marble(elvin, prudy)\nnot Verse(prudy, elvin)\nVerse(prudy, ayn)\nMoneyed(prudy)\nRelieve(prudy, elvin)\nnot Relieve(prudy, ayn)\nMarble(prudy, ayn)\nVerse(ayn, prudy)\nnot Swishy(ayn)\nMoneyed(ayn)\nRelieve(ayn, elvin)\nRelieve(ayn, prudy)\nforall x (Relieve(x, ayn) and Swishy(x) -> not Swishy(ayn))\nforall x (Verse(x, elvin) -> not Verse(elvin, prudy))\nforall x (Marble(x, elvin) and not Relieve(elvin, ayn) -> not Swishy(x))\nforall x (Marble(x, prudy) -> not Swishy(prudy))\nforall x (Dentate(x) and Moneyed(x) -> Marble(x, elvin))\nforall x (Moneyed(x) and Verse(x, prudy) -> Marble(x, prudy))\n\nSwishy(prudy)\n\nMoneyed(ayn) and Verse(ayn, prudy) and forall x (Moneyed(x) and Verse(x, prudy) -> Marble(x, prudy)) -> therefore Marble(ayn, prudy) Marble(ayn, prudy) and forall x (Marble(x, prudy) -> not Swishy(prudy)) -> therefore not Swishy(prudy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The dorelia is profitless. The dorelia unsay the samson. The dorelia unsay the donnajean. The dorelia does not need the samson. The samson does not chase the dorelia. The samson meddle the donnajean. The samson is lewd. The samson unsay the dorelia. The samson does not like the donnajean. The samson fledge the donnajean. The donnajean meddle the samson. The donnajean is not profitless. The donnajean is lewd. The donnajean unsay the dorelia. The donnajean unsay the samson. If someone unsay the donnajean and they are profitless then the donnajean is not profitless. If someone meddle the dorelia then the dorelia does not chase the samson. If someone fledge the dorelia and the dorelia does not like the donnajean then they are not profitless. If someone fledge the samson then the samson is not profitless. If someone is phonemic and lewd then they need the dorelia. If someone is lewd and they chase the samson then they need the samson. The dorelia does not need the dorelia.", "logic": "\nProfitless(dorelia)\nUnsay(dorelia, samson)\nUnsay(dorelia, donnajean)\nnot Fledge(dorelia, samson)\nnot Meddle(samson, dorelia)\nMeddle(samson, donnajean)\nLewd(samson)\nUnsay(samson, dorelia)\nnot Unsay(samson, donnajean)\nFledge(samson, donnajean)\nMeddle(donnajean, samson)\nnot Profitless(donnajean)\nLewd(donnajean)\nUnsay(donnajean, dorelia)\nUnsay(donnajean, samson)\nforall x (Unsay(x, donnajean) and Profitless(x) -> not Profitless(donnajean))\nforall x (Meddle(x, dorelia) -> not Meddle(dorelia, samson))\nforall x (Fledge(x, dorelia) and not Unsay(dorelia, donnajean) -> not Profitless(x))\nforall x (Fledge(x, samson) -> not Profitless(samson))\nforall x (Phonemic(x) and Lewd(x) -> Fledge(x, dorelia))\nforall x (Lewd(x) and Meddle(x, samson) -> Fledge(x, samson))\n\nnot Fledge(dorelia, dorelia)\n\nforall x (Phonemic(x) and Lewd(x) -> Fledge(x, dorelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The cheston is ribbony. The cheston barber the stavros. The cheston barber the ailene. The cheston does not need the stavros. The stavros does not chase the cheston. The stavros site the ailene. The stavros is agreeable. The stavros barber the cheston. The stavros does not like the ailene. The stavros throne the ailene. The ailene site the stavros. The ailene is not ribbony. The ailene is agreeable. The ailene barber the cheston. The ailene barber the stavros. If someone barber the ailene and they are ribbony then the ailene is not ribbony. If someone site the cheston then the cheston does not chase the stavros. If someone throne the cheston and the cheston does not like the ailene then they are not ribbony. If someone throne the stavros then the stavros is not ribbony. If someone is unblinking and agreeable then they need the cheston. If someone is agreeable and they chase the stavros then they need the stavros. The stavros throne the cheston.", "logic": "\nRibbony(cheston)\nBarber(cheston, stavros)\nBarber(cheston, ailene)\nnot Throne(cheston, stavros)\nnot Site(stavros, cheston)\nSite(stavros, ailene)\nAgreeable(stavros)\nBarber(stavros, cheston)\nnot Barber(stavros, ailene)\nThrone(stavros, ailene)\nSite(ailene, stavros)\nnot Ribbony(ailene)\nAgreeable(ailene)\nBarber(ailene, cheston)\nBarber(ailene, stavros)\nforall x (Barber(x, ailene) and Ribbony(x) -> not Ribbony(ailene))\nforall x (Site(x, cheston) -> not Site(cheston, stavros))\nforall x (Throne(x, cheston) and not Barber(cheston, ailene) -> not Ribbony(x))\nforall x (Throne(x, stavros) -> not Ribbony(stavros))\nforall x (Unblinking(x) and Agreeable(x) -> Throne(x, cheston))\nforall x (Agreeable(x) and Site(x, stavros) -> Throne(x, stavros))\n\nThrone(stavros, cheston)\n\nforall x (Unblinking(x) and Agreeable(x) -> Throne(x, cheston)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The marlene is best. The marlene reshoot the stacee. The marlene reshoot the eloise. The marlene does not need the stacee. The stacee does not chase the marlene. The stacee appeal the eloise. The stacee is sensate. The stacee reshoot the marlene. The stacee does not like the eloise. The stacee bill the eloise. The eloise appeal the stacee. The eloise is not best. The eloise is sensate. The eloise reshoot the marlene. The eloise reshoot the stacee. If someone reshoot the eloise and they are best then the eloise is not best. If someone appeal the marlene then the marlene does not chase the stacee. If someone bill the marlene and the marlene does not like the eloise then they are not best. If someone bill the stacee then the stacee is not best. If someone is anorectal and sensate then they need the marlene. If someone is sensate and they chase the stacee then they need the stacee. The eloise does not need the marlene.", "logic": "\nBest(marlene)\nReshoot(marlene, stacee)\nReshoot(marlene, eloise)\nnot Bill(marlene, stacee)\nnot Appeal(stacee, marlene)\nAppeal(stacee, eloise)\nSensate(stacee)\nReshoot(stacee, marlene)\nnot Reshoot(stacee, eloise)\nBill(stacee, eloise)\nAppeal(eloise, stacee)\nnot Best(eloise)\nSensate(eloise)\nReshoot(eloise, marlene)\nReshoot(eloise, stacee)\nforall x (Reshoot(x, eloise) and Best(x) -> not Best(eloise))\nforall x (Appeal(x, marlene) -> not Appeal(marlene, stacee))\nforall x (Bill(x, marlene) and not Reshoot(marlene, eloise) -> not Best(x))\nforall x (Bill(x, stacee) -> not Best(stacee))\nforall x (Anorectal(x) and Sensate(x) -> Bill(x, marlene))\nforall x (Sensate(x) and Appeal(x, stacee) -> Bill(x, stacee))\n\nnot Bill(eloise, marlene)\n\nforall x (Anorectal(x) and Sensate(x) -> Bill(x, marlene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The sapphire is leakproof. The sapphire scrimp the nealson. The sapphire scrimp the zandra. The sapphire does not need the nealson. The nealson does not chase the sapphire. The nealson moisten the zandra. The nealson is inst. The nealson scrimp the sapphire. The nealson does not like the zandra. The nealson shaft the zandra. The zandra moisten the nealson. The zandra is not leakproof. The zandra is inst. The zandra scrimp the sapphire. The zandra scrimp the nealson. If someone scrimp the zandra and they are leakproof then the zandra is not leakproof. If someone moisten the sapphire then the sapphire does not chase the nealson. If someone shaft the sapphire and the sapphire does not like the zandra then they are not leakproof. If someone shaft the nealson then the nealson is not leakproof. If someone is postictal and inst then they need the sapphire. If someone is inst and they chase the nealson then they need the nealson. The zandra scrimp the zandra.", "logic": "\nLeakproof(sapphire)\nScrimp(sapphire, nealson)\nScrimp(sapphire, zandra)\nnot Shaft(sapphire, nealson)\nnot Moisten(nealson, sapphire)\nMoisten(nealson, zandra)\nInst(nealson)\nScrimp(nealson, sapphire)\nnot Scrimp(nealson, zandra)\nShaft(nealson, zandra)\nMoisten(zandra, nealson)\nnot Leakproof(zandra)\nInst(zandra)\nScrimp(zandra, sapphire)\nScrimp(zandra, nealson)\nforall x (Scrimp(x, zandra) and Leakproof(x) -> not Leakproof(zandra))\nforall x (Moisten(x, sapphire) -> not Moisten(sapphire, nealson))\nforall x (Shaft(x, sapphire) and not Scrimp(sapphire, zandra) -> not Leakproof(x))\nforall x (Shaft(x, nealson) -> not Leakproof(nealson))\nforall x (Postictal(x) and Inst(x) -> Shaft(x, sapphire))\nforall x (Inst(x) and Moisten(x, nealson) -> Shaft(x, nealson))\n\nScrimp(zandra, zandra)\n\nScrimp(zandra, zandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The butler is antitypic. The butler suffuse the katrine. The butler suffuse the idalina. The butler does not need the katrine. The katrine does not chase the butler. The katrine cripple the idalina. The katrine is squelched. The katrine suffuse the butler. The katrine does not like the idalina. The katrine bullyrag the idalina. The idalina cripple the katrine. The idalina is not antitypic. The idalina is squelched. The idalina suffuse the butler. The idalina suffuse the katrine. If someone suffuse the idalina and they are antitypic then the idalina is not antitypic. If someone cripple the butler then the butler does not chase the katrine. If someone bullyrag the butler and the butler does not like the idalina then they are not antitypic. If someone bullyrag the katrine then the katrine is not antitypic. If someone is contrabass and squelched then they need the butler. If someone is squelched and they chase the katrine then they need the katrine. The katrine does not like the katrine.", "logic": "\nAntitypic(butler)\nSuffuse(butler, katrine)\nSuffuse(butler, idalina)\nnot Bullyrag(butler, katrine)\nnot Cripple(katrine, butler)\nCripple(katrine, idalina)\nSquelched(katrine)\nSuffuse(katrine, butler)\nnot Suffuse(katrine, idalina)\nBullyrag(katrine, idalina)\nCripple(idalina, katrine)\nnot Antitypic(idalina)\nSquelched(idalina)\nSuffuse(idalina, butler)\nSuffuse(idalina, katrine)\nforall x (Suffuse(x, idalina) and Antitypic(x) -> not Antitypic(idalina))\nforall x (Cripple(x, butler) -> not Cripple(butler, katrine))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, butler) and not Suffuse(butler, idalina) -> not Antitypic(x))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, katrine) -> not Antitypic(katrine))\nforall x (Contrabass(x) and Squelched(x) -> Bullyrag(x, butler))\nforall x (Squelched(x) and Cripple(x, katrine) -> Bullyrag(x, katrine))\n\nnot Suffuse(katrine, katrine)\n\nnot Suffuse(katrine, katrine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "The alasdair is conceited. The alasdair kayak the stormy. The alasdair kayak the mireille. The alasdair does not need the stormy. The stormy does not chase the alasdair. The stormy resplend the mireille. The stormy is vocal. The stormy kayak the alasdair. The stormy does not like the mireille. The stormy crust the mireille. The mireille resplend the stormy. The mireille is not conceited. The mireille is vocal. The mireille kayak the alasdair. The mireille kayak the stormy. If someone kayak the mireille and they are conceited then the mireille is not conceited. If someone resplend the alasdair then the alasdair does not chase the stormy. If someone crust the alasdair and the alasdair does not like the mireille then they are not conceited. If someone crust the stormy then the stormy is not conceited. If someone is jihadi and vocal then they need the alasdair. If someone is vocal and they chase the stormy then they need the stormy. The mireille crust the mireille.", "logic": "\nConceited(alasdair)\nKayak(alasdair, stormy)\nKayak(alasdair, mireille)\nnot Crust(alasdair, stormy)\nnot Resplend(stormy, alasdair)\nResplend(stormy, mireille)\nVocal(stormy)\nKayak(stormy, alasdair)\nnot Kayak(stormy, mireille)\nCrust(stormy, mireille)\nResplend(mireille, stormy)\nnot Conceited(mireille)\nVocal(mireille)\nKayak(mireille, alasdair)\nKayak(mireille, stormy)\nforall x (Kayak(x, mireille) and Conceited(x) -> not Conceited(mireille))\nforall x (Resplend(x, alasdair) -> not Resplend(alasdair, stormy))\nforall x (Crust(x, alasdair) and not Kayak(alasdair, mireille) -> not Conceited(x))\nforall x (Crust(x, stormy) -> not Conceited(stormy))\nforall x (Jihadi(x) and Vocal(x) -> Crust(x, alasdair))\nforall x (Vocal(x) and Resplend(x, stormy) -> Crust(x, stormy))\n\nCrust(mireille, mireille)\n\nCrust(mireille, mireille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1798"} {"premises": "Cherry is infallible. Giffie is uncool. Caterina is not infallible. Jonny is streetwise. Green things are casteless. All infallible things are not casteless. If Caterina is not infallible and Caterina is not luminous then Caterina is not streetwise. If Giffie is not parasitic then Giffie is luminous. If something is casteless and not streetwise then it is tiresome. If something is casteless and not infallible then it is not tiresome. If Cherry is streetwise then Cherry is not tiresome. If Cherry is not casteless then Cherry is not tiresome. Caterina is not infallible.", "logic": "\nInfallible(cherry)\nUncool(giffie)\nnot Infallible(caterina)\nStreetwise(jonny)\nforall x (Parasitic(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Infallible(x) -> not Casteless(x))\nnot Infallible(caterina) and not Luminous(caterina) -> not Streetwise(caterina)\nnot Parasitic(giffie) -> Luminous(giffie)\nforall x (Casteless(x) and not Streetwise(x) -> Tiresome(x))\nforall x (Casteless(x) and not Infallible(x) -> not Tiresome(x))\nStreetwise(cherry) -> not Tiresome(cherry)\nnot Casteless(cherry) -> not Tiresome(cherry)\n\nnot Infallible(caterina)\n\ntherefore not Infallible(caterina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Bel is spectacled. Mariette is antigenic. Felice is not spectacled. Frayda is voltarian. Green things are squealing. All spectacled things are not squealing. If Felice is not spectacled and Felice is not hinder then Felice is not voltarian. If Mariette is not ladened then Mariette is hinder. If something is squealing and not voltarian then it is raunchy. If something is squealing and not spectacled then it is not raunchy. If Bel is voltarian then Bel is not raunchy. If Bel is not squealing then Bel is not raunchy. Felice is spectacled.", "logic": "\nSpectacled(bel)\nAntigenic(mariette)\nnot Spectacled(felice)\nVoltarian(frayda)\nforall x (Ladened(x) -> Squealing(x))\nforall x (Spectacled(x) -> not Squealing(x))\nnot Spectacled(felice) and not Hinder(felice) -> not Voltarian(felice)\nnot Ladened(mariette) -> Hinder(mariette)\nforall x (Squealing(x) and not Voltarian(x) -> Raunchy(x))\nforall x (Squealing(x) and not Spectacled(x) -> not Raunchy(x))\nVoltarian(bel) -> not Raunchy(bel)\nnot Squealing(bel) -> not Raunchy(bel)\n\nSpectacled(felice)\n\ntherefore not Spectacled(felice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Adelice is husbandly. Bret is frail. Hervey is not husbandly. Cindie is upstair. Green things are sneak. All husbandly things are not sneak. If Hervey is not husbandly and Hervey is not adducent then Hervey is not upstair. If Bret is not auditory then Bret is adducent. If something is sneak and not upstair then it is unladylike. If something is sneak and not husbandly then it is not unladylike. If Adelice is upstair then Adelice is not unladylike. If Adelice is not sneak then Adelice is not unladylike. Adelice is not sneak.", "logic": "\nHusbandly(adelice)\nFrail(bret)\nnot Husbandly(hervey)\nUpstair(cindie)\nforall x (Auditory(x) -> Sneak(x))\nforall x (Husbandly(x) -> not Sneak(x))\nnot Husbandly(hervey) and not Adducent(hervey) -> not Upstair(hervey)\nnot Auditory(bret) -> Adducent(bret)\nforall x (Sneak(x) and not Upstair(x) -> Unladylike(x))\nforall x (Sneak(x) and not Husbandly(x) -> not Unladylike(x))\nUpstair(adelice) -> not Unladylike(adelice)\nnot Sneak(adelice) -> not Unladylike(adelice)\n\nnot Sneak(adelice)\n\nHusbandly(adelice) and forall x (Husbandly(x) -> not Sneak(x)) -> therefore not Sneak(adelice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Oralia is renewable. Arabel is perturbed. Tine is not renewable. Thatch is unexampled. Green things are manorial. All renewable things are not manorial. If Tine is not renewable and Tine is not shaggy then Tine is not unexampled. If Arabel is not cherry then Arabel is shaggy. If something is manorial and not unexampled then it is down. If something is manorial and not renewable then it is not down. If Oralia is unexampled then Oralia is not down. If Oralia is not manorial then Oralia is not down. Oralia is manorial.", "logic": "\nRenewable(oralia)\nPerturbed(arabel)\nnot Renewable(tine)\nUnexampled(thatch)\nforall x (Cherry(x) -> Manorial(x))\nforall x (Renewable(x) -> not Manorial(x))\nnot Renewable(tine) and not Shaggy(tine) -> not Unexampled(tine)\nnot Cherry(arabel) -> Shaggy(arabel)\nforall x (Manorial(x) and not Unexampled(x) -> Down(x))\nforall x (Manorial(x) and not Renewable(x) -> not Down(x))\nUnexampled(oralia) -> not Down(oralia)\nnot Manorial(oralia) -> not Down(oralia)\n\nManorial(oralia)\n\nRenewable(oralia) and forall x (Renewable(x) -> not Manorial(x)) -> therefore not Manorial(oralia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Alister is insolvable. Linet is homy. Lindy is not insolvable. Godfry is sized. Green things are unreached. All insolvable things are not unreached. If Lindy is not insolvable and Lindy is not lengthways then Lindy is not sized. If Linet is not swishy then Linet is lengthways. If something is unreached and not sized then it is canonic. If something is unreached and not insolvable then it is not canonic. If Alister is sized then Alister is not canonic. If Alister is not unreached then Alister is not canonic. Alister is not canonic.", "logic": "\nInsolvable(alister)\nHomy(linet)\nnot Insolvable(lindy)\nSized(godfry)\nforall x (Swishy(x) -> Unreached(x))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) -> not Unreached(x))\nnot Insolvable(lindy) and not Lengthways(lindy) -> not Sized(lindy)\nnot Swishy(linet) -> Lengthways(linet)\nforall x (Unreached(x) and not Sized(x) -> Canonic(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and not Insolvable(x) -> not Canonic(x))\nSized(alister) -> not Canonic(alister)\nnot Unreached(alister) -> not Canonic(alister)\n\nnot Canonic(alister)\n\nInsolvable(alister) and forall x (Insolvable(x) -> not Unreached(x)) -> therefore not Unreached(alister) not Unreached(alister) and not Unreached(alister) -> not Canonic(alister) -> therefore not Canonic(alister)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Antone is unbuttoned. Danit is ambulacral. Jesselyn is not unbuttoned. Sherlocke is riveting. Green things are aged. All unbuttoned things are not aged. If Jesselyn is not unbuttoned and Jesselyn is not strategic then Jesselyn is not riveting. If Danit is not overarm then Danit is strategic. If something is aged and not riveting then it is fourfold. If something is aged and not unbuttoned then it is not fourfold. If Antone is riveting then Antone is not fourfold. If Antone is not aged then Antone is not fourfold. Antone is fourfold.", "logic": "\nUnbuttoned(antone)\nAmbulacral(danit)\nnot Unbuttoned(jesselyn)\nRiveting(sherlocke)\nforall x (Overarm(x) -> Aged(x))\nforall x (Unbuttoned(x) -> not Aged(x))\nnot Unbuttoned(jesselyn) and not Strategic(jesselyn) -> not Riveting(jesselyn)\nnot Overarm(danit) -> Strategic(danit)\nforall x (Aged(x) and not Riveting(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nforall x (Aged(x) and not Unbuttoned(x) -> not Fourfold(x))\nRiveting(antone) -> not Fourfold(antone)\nnot Aged(antone) -> not Fourfold(antone)\n\nFourfold(antone)\n\nUnbuttoned(antone) and forall x (Unbuttoned(x) -> not Aged(x)) -> therefore not Aged(antone) not Aged(antone) and not Aged(antone) -> not Fourfold(antone) -> therefore not Fourfold(antone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Fremont is defending. Maris is homesick. Simone is not defending. Roxie is dioecian. Green things are regimental. All defending things are not regimental. If Simone is not defending and Simone is not hideous then Simone is not dioecian. If Maris is not echolike then Maris is hideous. If something is regimental and not dioecian then it is armless. If something is regimental and not defending then it is not armless. If Fremont is dioecian then Fremont is not armless. If Fremont is not regimental then Fremont is not armless. Roxie is not armless.", "logic": "\nDefending(fremont)\nHomesick(maris)\nnot Defending(simone)\nDioecian(roxie)\nforall x (Echolike(x) -> Regimental(x))\nforall x (Defending(x) -> not Regimental(x))\nnot Defending(simone) and not Hideous(simone) -> not Dioecian(simone)\nnot Echolike(maris) -> Hideous(maris)\nforall x (Regimental(x) and not Dioecian(x) -> Armless(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) and not Defending(x) -> not Armless(x))\nDioecian(fremont) -> not Armless(fremont)\nnot Regimental(fremont) -> not Armless(fremont)\n\nnot Armless(roxie)\n\nforall x (Regimental(x) and not Dioecian(x) -> Armless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Kevina is unchecked. Trixie is netted. Tessa is not unchecked. Tedie is undaunted. Green things are booming. All unchecked things are not booming. If Tessa is not unchecked and Tessa is not identical then Tessa is not undaunted. If Trixie is not vapourous then Trixie is identical. If something is booming and not undaunted then it is mindless. If something is booming and not unchecked then it is not mindless. If Kevina is undaunted then Kevina is not mindless. If Kevina is not booming then Kevina is not mindless. Tedie is booming.", "logic": "\nUnchecked(kevina)\nNetted(trixie)\nnot Unchecked(tessa)\nUndaunted(tedie)\nforall x (Vapourous(x) -> Booming(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) -> not Booming(x))\nnot Unchecked(tessa) and not Identical(tessa) -> not Undaunted(tessa)\nnot Vapourous(trixie) -> Identical(trixie)\nforall x (Booming(x) and not Undaunted(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Booming(x) and not Unchecked(x) -> not Mindless(x))\nUndaunted(kevina) -> not Mindless(kevina)\nnot Booming(kevina) -> not Mindless(kevina)\n\nBooming(tedie)\n\nforall x (Vapourous(x) -> Booming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Felicia is funicular. Carree is broken. Aziz is not funicular. Floyd is inhibited. Green things are autotelic. All funicular things are not autotelic. If Aziz is not funicular and Aziz is not rugged then Aziz is not inhibited. If Carree is not unrevealed then Carree is rugged. If something is autotelic and not inhibited then it is guiding. If something is autotelic and not funicular then it is not guiding. If Felicia is inhibited then Felicia is not guiding. If Felicia is not autotelic then Felicia is not guiding. Carree is not rugged.", "logic": "\nFunicular(felicia)\nBroken(carree)\nnot Funicular(aziz)\nInhibited(floyd)\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Autotelic(x))\nforall x (Funicular(x) -> not Autotelic(x))\nnot Funicular(aziz) and not Rugged(aziz) -> not Inhibited(aziz)\nnot Unrevealed(carree) -> Rugged(carree)\nforall x (Autotelic(x) and not Inhibited(x) -> Guiding(x))\nforall x (Autotelic(x) and not Funicular(x) -> not Guiding(x))\nInhibited(felicia) -> not Guiding(felicia)\nnot Autotelic(felicia) -> not Guiding(felicia)\n\nnot Rugged(carree)\n\nnot Unrevealed(carree) -> Rugged(carree) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Bubba is sparse. Haily is spoilt. Nelli is not sparse. Jake is rustling. Green things are rational. All sparse things are not rational. If Nelli is not sparse and Nelli is not horny then Nelli is not rustling. If Haily is not multilevel then Haily is horny. If something is rational and not rustling then it is inerrant. If something is rational and not sparse then it is not inerrant. If Bubba is rustling then Bubba is not inerrant. If Bubba is not rational then Bubba is not inerrant. Nelli is rustling.", "logic": "\nSparse(bubba)\nSpoilt(haily)\nnot Sparse(nelli)\nRustling(jake)\nforall x (Multilevel(x) -> Rational(x))\nforall x (Sparse(x) -> not Rational(x))\nnot Sparse(nelli) and not Horny(nelli) -> not Rustling(nelli)\nnot Multilevel(haily) -> Horny(haily)\nforall x (Rational(x) and not Rustling(x) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Rational(x) and not Sparse(x) -> not Inerrant(x))\nRustling(bubba) -> not Inerrant(bubba)\nnot Rational(bubba) -> not Inerrant(bubba)\n\nRustling(nelli)\n\nRustling(nelli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Luelle is cooked. Rayshell is shrubby. Erena is not cooked. Garv is maroon. Green things are algonkian. All cooked things are not algonkian. If Erena is not cooked and Erena is not biovular then Erena is not maroon. If Rayshell is not indusial then Rayshell is biovular. If something is algonkian and not maroon then it is overmodest. If something is algonkian and not cooked then it is not overmodest. If Luelle is maroon then Luelle is not overmodest. If Luelle is not algonkian then Luelle is not overmodest. Rayshell is not cooked.", "logic": "\nCooked(luelle)\nShrubby(rayshell)\nnot Cooked(erena)\nMaroon(garv)\nforall x (Indusial(x) -> Algonkian(x))\nforall x (Cooked(x) -> not Algonkian(x))\nnot Cooked(erena) and not Biovular(erena) -> not Maroon(erena)\nnot Indusial(rayshell) -> Biovular(rayshell)\nforall x (Algonkian(x) and not Maroon(x) -> Overmodest(x))\nforall x (Algonkian(x) and not Cooked(x) -> not Overmodest(x))\nMaroon(luelle) -> not Overmodest(luelle)\nnot Algonkian(luelle) -> not Overmodest(luelle)\n\nnot Cooked(rayshell)\n\nnot Cooked(rayshell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Florette is unheard. Dwaine is enervated. Rochester is not unheard. Jonell is deistic. Green things are thyroid. All unheard things are not thyroid. If Rochester is not unheard and Rochester is not enduring then Rochester is not deistic. If Dwaine is not admonitory then Dwaine is enduring. If something is thyroid and not deistic then it is abducent. If something is thyroid and not unheard then it is not abducent. If Florette is deistic then Florette is not abducent. If Florette is not thyroid then Florette is not abducent. Florette is enduring.", "logic": "\nUnheard(florette)\nEnervated(dwaine)\nnot Unheard(rochester)\nDeistic(jonell)\nforall x (Admonitory(x) -> Thyroid(x))\nforall x (Unheard(x) -> not Thyroid(x))\nnot Unheard(rochester) and not Enduring(rochester) -> not Deistic(rochester)\nnot Admonitory(dwaine) -> Enduring(dwaine)\nforall x (Thyroid(x) and not Deistic(x) -> Abducent(x))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) and not Unheard(x) -> not Abducent(x))\nDeistic(florette) -> not Abducent(florette)\nnot Thyroid(florette) -> not Abducent(florette)\n\nEnduring(florette)\n\nEnduring(florette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-547"} {"premises": "Joselyn is scholarly. Joselyn is unassigned. Joselyn is fresh. Young, sappy things are stoned. Young things are sheeny. Furry, fresh things are sappy. Joselyn is unassigned.", "logic": "\nScholarly(joselyn)\nUnassigned(joselyn)\nFresh(joselyn)\nforall x (Fresh(x) and Sappy(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Fresh(x) -> Sheeny(x))\nforall x (Scholarly(x) and Fresh(x) -> Sappy(x))\n\nUnassigned(joselyn)\n\ntherefore Unassigned(joselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1612"} {"premises": "Timothy is primeval. Timothy is hypnotised. Timothy is mucinous. Young, allied things are disjointed. Young things are dual. Furry, mucinous things are allied. Timothy is not hypnotised.", "logic": "\nPrimeval(timothy)\nHypnotised(timothy)\nMucinous(timothy)\nforall x (Mucinous(x) and Allied(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Primeval(x) and Mucinous(x) -> Allied(x))\n\nnot Hypnotised(timothy)\n\ntherefore Hypnotised(timothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1612"} {"premises": "Billy is azonic. Billy is extirpable. Billy is lurid. Young, puffy things are sullen. Young things are hind. Furry, lurid things are puffy. Billy is hind.", "logic": "\nAzonic(billy)\nExtirpable(billy)\nLurid(billy)\nforall x (Lurid(x) and Puffy(x) -> Sullen(x))\nforall x (Lurid(x) -> Hind(x))\nforall x (Azonic(x) and Lurid(x) -> Puffy(x))\n\nHind(billy)\n\nLurid(billy) and forall x (Lurid(x) -> Hind(x)) -> therefore Hind(billy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1612"} {"premises": "Robert is shona. Robert is indiscreet. Robert is quirky. Young, imprecise things are sable. Young things are clarion. Furry, quirky things are imprecise. Robert is not imprecise.", "logic": "\nShona(robert)\nIndiscreet(robert)\nQuirky(robert)\nforall x (Quirky(x) and Imprecise(x) -> Sable(x))\nforall x (Quirky(x) -> Clarion(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) and Quirky(x) -> Imprecise(x))\n\nnot Imprecise(robert)\n\nShona(robert) and Quirky(robert) and forall x (Shona(x) and Quirky(x) -> Imprecise(x)) -> therefore Imprecise(robert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1612"} {"premises": "Dustin is plucked. Dustin is smoked. Dustin is alone. Young, recent things are refractory. Young things are downwind. Furry, alone things are recent. Dustin is refractory.", "logic": "\nPlucked(dustin)\nSmoked(dustin)\nAlone(dustin)\nforall x (Alone(x) and Recent(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Alone(x) -> Downwind(x))\nforall x (Plucked(x) and Alone(x) -> Recent(x))\n\nRefractory(dustin)\n\nPlucked(dustin) and Alone(dustin) and forall x (Plucked(x) and Alone(x) -> Recent(x)) -> therefore Recent(dustin) Alone(dustin) and Recent(dustin) and forall x (Alone(x) and Recent(x) -> Refractory(x)) -> therefore Refractory(dustin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1612"} {"premises": "Donica is clunky. Donica is hellenic. Donica is romanist. Young, arguable things are catarrhine. Young things are stodgy. Furry, romanist things are arguable. Donica is not catarrhine.", "logic": "\nClunky(donica)\nHellenic(donica)\nRomanist(donica)\nforall x (Romanist(x) and Arguable(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Romanist(x) -> Stodgy(x))\nforall x (Clunky(x) and Romanist(x) -> Arguable(x))\n\nnot Catarrhine(donica)\n\nClunky(donica) and Romanist(donica) and forall x (Clunky(x) and Romanist(x) -> Arguable(x)) -> therefore Arguable(donica) Romanist(donica) and Arguable(donica) and forall x (Romanist(x) and Arguable(x) -> Catarrhine(x)) -> therefore Catarrhine(donica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1612"} {"premises": "The robby is dipterous. The robby is roving. The robby is polygenic. The robby yoke the demetra. The robby bargain the demetra. The demetra is dipterous. The demetra yoke the cynthia. The demetra coronate the robby. The demetra bargain the cynthia. The cynthia is undeniable. The cynthia is dipterous. The cynthia is roving. The cynthia yoke the demetra. The cynthia bargain the robby. The cynthia bargain the demetra. If someone is undeniable then they do not need the cynthia. All undeniable people are forty. If the cynthia is not polygenic then the cynthia coronate the robby. If someone bargain the demetra and they do not need the cynthia then the demetra coronate the cynthia. If someone bargain the demetra and they do not see the robby then they do not visit the robby. If someone coronate the robby and they do not visit the robby then they see the cynthia. The demetra is dipterous.", "logic": "\nDipterous(robby)\nRoving(robby)\nPolygenic(robby)\nYoke(robby, demetra)\nBargain(robby, demetra)\nDipterous(demetra)\nYoke(demetra, cynthia)\nCoronate(demetra, robby)\nBargain(demetra, cynthia)\nUndeniable(cynthia)\nDipterous(cynthia)\nRoving(cynthia)\nYoke(cynthia, demetra)\nBargain(cynthia, robby)\nBargain(cynthia, demetra)\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> not Yoke(x, cynthia))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Forty(x))\nnot Polygenic(cynthia) -> Coronate(cynthia, robby)\nforall x (Bargain(x, demetra) and not Yoke(x, cynthia) -> Coronate(demetra, cynthia))\nforall x (Bargain(x, demetra) and not Coronate(x, robby) -> not Bargain(x, robby))\nforall x (Coronate(x, robby) and not Bargain(x, robby) -> Coronate(x, cynthia))\n\nDipterous(demetra)\n\ntherefore Dipterous(demetra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The priscella is winking. The priscella is prisonlike. The priscella is leisurely. The priscella antedate the tammara. The priscella amuse the tammara. The tammara is winking. The tammara antedate the farica. The tammara foreshow the priscella. The tammara amuse the farica. The farica is haggard. The farica is winking. The farica is prisonlike. The farica antedate the tammara. The farica amuse the priscella. The farica amuse the tammara. If someone is haggard then they do not need the farica. All haggard people are pliable. If the farica is not leisurely then the farica foreshow the priscella. If someone amuse the tammara and they do not need the farica then the tammara foreshow the farica. If someone amuse the tammara and they do not see the priscella then they do not visit the priscella. If someone foreshow the priscella and they do not visit the priscella then they see the farica. The priscella does not visit the tammara.", "logic": "\nWinking(priscella)\nPrisonlike(priscella)\nLeisurely(priscella)\nAntedate(priscella, tammara)\nAmuse(priscella, tammara)\nWinking(tammara)\nAntedate(tammara, farica)\nForeshow(tammara, priscella)\nAmuse(tammara, farica)\nHaggard(farica)\nWinking(farica)\nPrisonlike(farica)\nAntedate(farica, tammara)\nAmuse(farica, priscella)\nAmuse(farica, tammara)\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> not Antedate(x, farica))\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Pliable(x))\nnot Leisurely(farica) -> Foreshow(farica, priscella)\nforall x (Amuse(x, tammara) and not Antedate(x, farica) -> Foreshow(tammara, farica))\nforall x (Amuse(x, tammara) and not Foreshow(x, priscella) -> not Amuse(x, priscella))\nforall x (Foreshow(x, priscella) and not Amuse(x, priscella) -> Foreshow(x, farica))\n\nnot Amuse(priscella, tammara)\n\ntherefore Amuse(priscella, tammara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The franklin is balzacian. The franklin is reasonless. The franklin is maddening. The franklin exile the veda. The franklin transit the veda. The veda is balzacian. The veda exile the fanchette. The veda supply the franklin. The veda transit the fanchette. The fanchette is enamored. The fanchette is balzacian. The fanchette is reasonless. The fanchette exile the veda. The fanchette transit the franklin. The fanchette transit the veda. If someone is enamored then they do not need the fanchette. All enamored people are unkindly. If the fanchette is not maddening then the fanchette supply the franklin. If someone transit the veda and they do not need the fanchette then the veda supply the fanchette. If someone transit the veda and they do not see the franklin then they do not visit the franklin. If someone supply the franklin and they do not visit the franklin then they see the fanchette. The fanchette is unkindly.", "logic": "\nBalzacian(franklin)\nReasonless(franklin)\nMaddening(franklin)\nExile(franklin, veda)\nTransit(franklin, veda)\nBalzacian(veda)\nExile(veda, fanchette)\nSupply(veda, franklin)\nTransit(veda, fanchette)\nEnamored(fanchette)\nBalzacian(fanchette)\nReasonless(fanchette)\nExile(fanchette, veda)\nTransit(fanchette, franklin)\nTransit(fanchette, veda)\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> not Exile(x, fanchette))\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> Unkindly(x))\nnot Maddening(fanchette) -> Supply(fanchette, franklin)\nforall x (Transit(x, veda) and not Exile(x, fanchette) -> Supply(veda, fanchette))\nforall x (Transit(x, veda) and not Supply(x, franklin) -> not Transit(x, franklin))\nforall x (Supply(x, franklin) and not Transit(x, franklin) -> Supply(x, fanchette))\n\nUnkindly(fanchette)\n\nEnamored(fanchette) and forall x (Enamored(x) -> Unkindly(x)) -> therefore Unkindly(fanchette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The anatola is celtic. The anatola is laotian. The anatola is epistolary. The anatola protract the carlie. The anatola ground the carlie. The carlie is celtic. The carlie protract the kaiser. The carlie pillow the anatola. The carlie ground the kaiser. The kaiser is unshakable. The kaiser is celtic. The kaiser is laotian. The kaiser protract the carlie. The kaiser ground the anatola. The kaiser ground the carlie. If someone is unshakable then they do not need the kaiser. All unshakable people are shavian. If the kaiser is not epistolary then the kaiser pillow the anatola. If someone ground the carlie and they do not need the kaiser then the carlie pillow the kaiser. If someone ground the carlie and they do not see the anatola then they do not visit the anatola. If someone pillow the anatola and they do not visit the anatola then they see the kaiser. The kaiser is not shavian.", "logic": "\nCeltic(anatola)\nLaotian(anatola)\nEpistolary(anatola)\nProtract(anatola, carlie)\nGround(anatola, carlie)\nCeltic(carlie)\nProtract(carlie, kaiser)\nPillow(carlie, anatola)\nGround(carlie, kaiser)\nUnshakable(kaiser)\nCeltic(kaiser)\nLaotian(kaiser)\nProtract(kaiser, carlie)\nGround(kaiser, anatola)\nGround(kaiser, carlie)\nforall x (Unshakable(x) -> not Protract(x, kaiser))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) -> Shavian(x))\nnot Epistolary(kaiser) -> Pillow(kaiser, anatola)\nforall x (Ground(x, carlie) and not Protract(x, kaiser) -> Pillow(carlie, kaiser))\nforall x (Ground(x, carlie) and not Pillow(x, anatola) -> not Ground(x, anatola))\nforall x (Pillow(x, anatola) and not Ground(x, anatola) -> Pillow(x, kaiser))\n\nnot Shavian(kaiser)\n\nUnshakable(kaiser) and forall x (Unshakable(x) -> Shavian(x)) -> therefore Shavian(kaiser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The leontyne is spiffy. The leontyne is marvelous. The leontyne is yonder. The leontyne rant the gerladina. The leontyne bolster the gerladina. The gerladina is spiffy. The gerladina rant the celinka. The gerladina undeceive the leontyne. The gerladina bolster the celinka. The celinka is plausible. The celinka is spiffy. The celinka is marvelous. The celinka rant the gerladina. The celinka bolster the leontyne. The celinka bolster the gerladina. If someone is plausible then they do not need the celinka. All plausible people are vengeful. If the celinka is not yonder then the celinka undeceive the leontyne. If someone bolster the gerladina and they do not need the celinka then the gerladina undeceive the celinka. If someone bolster the gerladina and they do not see the leontyne then they do not visit the leontyne. If someone undeceive the leontyne and they do not visit the leontyne then they see the celinka. The gerladina undeceive the celinka.", "logic": "\nSpiffy(leontyne)\nMarvelous(leontyne)\nYonder(leontyne)\nRant(leontyne, gerladina)\nBolster(leontyne, gerladina)\nSpiffy(gerladina)\nRant(gerladina, celinka)\nUndeceive(gerladina, leontyne)\nBolster(gerladina, celinka)\nPlausible(celinka)\nSpiffy(celinka)\nMarvelous(celinka)\nRant(celinka, gerladina)\nBolster(celinka, leontyne)\nBolster(celinka, gerladina)\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> not Rant(x, celinka))\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nnot Yonder(celinka) -> Undeceive(celinka, leontyne)\nforall x (Bolster(x, gerladina) and not Rant(x, celinka) -> Undeceive(gerladina, celinka))\nforall x (Bolster(x, gerladina) and not Undeceive(x, leontyne) -> not Bolster(x, leontyne))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, leontyne) and not Bolster(x, leontyne) -> Undeceive(x, celinka))\n\nUndeceive(gerladina, celinka)\n\nPlausible(celinka) and forall x (Plausible(x) -> not Rant(x, celinka)) -> therefore not Rant(celinka, celinka) Bolster(celinka, gerladina) and not Rant(celinka, celinka) and forall x (Bolster(x, gerladina) and not Rant(x, celinka) -> Undeceive(gerladina, celinka)) -> therefore Undeceive(gerladina, celinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The shanie is viewable. The shanie is lavish. The shanie is intertidal. The shanie habituate the ursala. The shanie miaou the ursala. The ursala is viewable. The ursala habituate the lacee. The ursala retouch the shanie. The ursala miaou the lacee. The lacee is sericeous. The lacee is viewable. The lacee is lavish. The lacee habituate the ursala. The lacee miaou the shanie. The lacee miaou the ursala. If someone is sericeous then they do not need the lacee. All sericeous people are noncaloric. If the lacee is not intertidal then the lacee retouch the shanie. If someone miaou the ursala and they do not need the lacee then the ursala retouch the lacee. If someone miaou the ursala and they do not see the shanie then they do not visit the shanie. If someone retouch the shanie and they do not visit the shanie then they see the lacee. The ursala does not see the lacee.", "logic": "\nViewable(shanie)\nLavish(shanie)\nIntertidal(shanie)\nHabituate(shanie, ursala)\nMiaou(shanie, ursala)\nViewable(ursala)\nHabituate(ursala, lacee)\nRetouch(ursala, shanie)\nMiaou(ursala, lacee)\nSericeous(lacee)\nViewable(lacee)\nLavish(lacee)\nHabituate(lacee, ursala)\nMiaou(lacee, shanie)\nMiaou(lacee, ursala)\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> not Habituate(x, lacee))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nnot Intertidal(lacee) -> Retouch(lacee, shanie)\nforall x (Miaou(x, ursala) and not Habituate(x, lacee) -> Retouch(ursala, lacee))\nforall x (Miaou(x, ursala) and not Retouch(x, shanie) -> not Miaou(x, shanie))\nforall x (Retouch(x, shanie) and not Miaou(x, shanie) -> Retouch(x, lacee))\n\nnot Retouch(ursala, lacee)\n\nSericeous(lacee) and forall x (Sericeous(x) -> not Habituate(x, lacee)) -> therefore not Habituate(lacee, lacee) Miaou(lacee, ursala) and not Habituate(lacee, lacee) and forall x (Miaou(x, ursala) and not Habituate(x, lacee) -> Retouch(ursala, lacee)) -> therefore Retouch(ursala, lacee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The sophey is orbicular. The sophey is topping. The sophey is untactful. The sophey peptise the shirlee. The sophey factorize the shirlee. The shirlee is orbicular. The shirlee peptise the caspar. The shirlee contort the sophey. The shirlee factorize the caspar. The caspar is demure. The caspar is orbicular. The caspar is topping. The caspar peptise the shirlee. The caspar factorize the sophey. The caspar factorize the shirlee. If someone is demure then they do not need the caspar. All demure people are appellant. If the caspar is not untactful then the caspar contort the sophey. If someone factorize the shirlee and they do not need the caspar then the shirlee contort the caspar. If someone factorize the shirlee and they do not see the sophey then they do not visit the sophey. If someone contort the sophey and they do not visit the sophey then they see the caspar. The sophey does not see the caspar.", "logic": "\nOrbicular(sophey)\nTopping(sophey)\nUntactful(sophey)\nPeptise(sophey, shirlee)\nFactorize(sophey, shirlee)\nOrbicular(shirlee)\nPeptise(shirlee, caspar)\nContort(shirlee, sophey)\nFactorize(shirlee, caspar)\nDemure(caspar)\nOrbicular(caspar)\nTopping(caspar)\nPeptise(caspar, shirlee)\nFactorize(caspar, sophey)\nFactorize(caspar, shirlee)\nforall x (Demure(x) -> not Peptise(x, caspar))\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Appellant(x))\nnot Untactful(caspar) -> Contort(caspar, sophey)\nforall x (Factorize(x, shirlee) and not Peptise(x, caspar) -> Contort(shirlee, caspar))\nforall x (Factorize(x, shirlee) and not Contort(x, sophey) -> not Factorize(x, sophey))\nforall x (Contort(x, sophey) and not Factorize(x, sophey) -> Contort(x, caspar))\n\nnot Contort(sophey, caspar)\n\nforall x (Contort(x, sophey) and not Factorize(x, sophey) -> Contort(x, caspar)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The dorie is unequaled. The dorie is desiccate. The dorie is compact. The dorie concentre the layton. The dorie castrate the layton. The layton is unequaled. The layton concentre the gwendolin. The layton outlaw the dorie. The layton castrate the gwendolin. The gwendolin is seminude. The gwendolin is unequaled. The gwendolin is desiccate. The gwendolin concentre the layton. The gwendolin castrate the dorie. The gwendolin castrate the layton. If someone is seminude then they do not need the gwendolin. All seminude people are corrupting. If the gwendolin is not compact then the gwendolin outlaw the dorie. If someone castrate the layton and they do not need the gwendolin then the layton outlaw the gwendolin. If someone castrate the layton and they do not see the dorie then they do not visit the dorie. If someone outlaw the dorie and they do not visit the dorie then they see the gwendolin. The gwendolin outlaw the dorie.", "logic": "\nUnequaled(dorie)\nDesiccate(dorie)\nCompact(dorie)\nConcentre(dorie, layton)\nCastrate(dorie, layton)\nUnequaled(layton)\nConcentre(layton, gwendolin)\nOutlaw(layton, dorie)\nCastrate(layton, gwendolin)\nSeminude(gwendolin)\nUnequaled(gwendolin)\nDesiccate(gwendolin)\nConcentre(gwendolin, layton)\nCastrate(gwendolin, dorie)\nCastrate(gwendolin, layton)\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> not Concentre(x, gwendolin))\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nnot Compact(gwendolin) -> Outlaw(gwendolin, dorie)\nforall x (Castrate(x, layton) and not Concentre(x, gwendolin) -> Outlaw(layton, gwendolin))\nforall x (Castrate(x, layton) and not Outlaw(x, dorie) -> not Castrate(x, dorie))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, dorie) and not Castrate(x, dorie) -> Outlaw(x, gwendolin))\n\nOutlaw(gwendolin, dorie)\n\nnot Compact(gwendolin) -> Outlaw(gwendolin, dorie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The freddie is diverging. The freddie is cattish. The freddie is apoplectic. The freddie mother the inci. The freddie motorbike the inci. The inci is diverging. The inci mother the joaquin. The inci produce the freddie. The inci motorbike the joaquin. The joaquin is hopeful. The joaquin is diverging. The joaquin is cattish. The joaquin mother the inci. The joaquin motorbike the freddie. The joaquin motorbike the inci. If someone is hopeful then they do not need the joaquin. All hopeful people are alive. If the joaquin is not apoplectic then the joaquin produce the freddie. If someone motorbike the inci and they do not need the joaquin then the inci produce the joaquin. If someone motorbike the inci and they do not see the freddie then they do not visit the freddie. If someone produce the freddie and they do not visit the freddie then they see the joaquin. The inci is not alive.", "logic": "\nDiverging(freddie)\nCattish(freddie)\nApoplectic(freddie)\nMother(freddie, inci)\nMotorbike(freddie, inci)\nDiverging(inci)\nMother(inci, joaquin)\nProduce(inci, freddie)\nMotorbike(inci, joaquin)\nHopeful(joaquin)\nDiverging(joaquin)\nCattish(joaquin)\nMother(joaquin, inci)\nMotorbike(joaquin, freddie)\nMotorbike(joaquin, inci)\nforall x (Hopeful(x) -> not Mother(x, joaquin))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) -> Alive(x))\nnot Apoplectic(joaquin) -> Produce(joaquin, freddie)\nforall x (Motorbike(x, inci) and not Mother(x, joaquin) -> Produce(inci, joaquin))\nforall x (Motorbike(x, inci) and not Produce(x, freddie) -> not Motorbike(x, freddie))\nforall x (Produce(x, freddie) and not Motorbike(x, freddie) -> Produce(x, joaquin))\n\nnot Alive(inci)\n\nforall x (Hopeful(x) -> Alive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The rheta is harmful. The rheta is sprigged. The rheta is ceylonese. The rheta splash the rosita. The rheta encroach the rosita. The rosita is harmful. The rosita splash the latisha. The rosita bloat the rheta. The rosita encroach the latisha. The latisha is canonic. The latisha is harmful. The latisha is sprigged. The latisha splash the rosita. The latisha encroach the rheta. The latisha encroach the rosita. If someone is canonic then they do not need the latisha. All canonic people are interlaced. If the latisha is not ceylonese then the latisha bloat the rheta. If someone encroach the rosita and they do not need the latisha then the rosita bloat the latisha. If someone encroach the rosita and they do not see the rheta then they do not visit the rheta. If someone bloat the rheta and they do not visit the rheta then they see the latisha. The rosita splash the rheta.", "logic": "\nHarmful(rheta)\nSprigged(rheta)\nCeylonese(rheta)\nSplash(rheta, rosita)\nEncroach(rheta, rosita)\nHarmful(rosita)\nSplash(rosita, latisha)\nBloat(rosita, rheta)\nEncroach(rosita, latisha)\nCanonic(latisha)\nHarmful(latisha)\nSprigged(latisha)\nSplash(latisha, rosita)\nEncroach(latisha, rheta)\nEncroach(latisha, rosita)\nforall x (Canonic(x) -> not Splash(x, latisha))\nforall x (Canonic(x) -> Interlaced(x))\nnot Ceylonese(latisha) -> Bloat(latisha, rheta)\nforall x (Encroach(x, rosita) and not Splash(x, latisha) -> Bloat(rosita, latisha))\nforall x (Encroach(x, rosita) and not Bloat(x, rheta) -> not Encroach(x, rheta))\nforall x (Bloat(x, rheta) and not Encroach(x, rheta) -> Bloat(x, latisha))\n\nSplash(rosita, rheta)\n\nSplash(rosita, rheta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The cesya is bicoloured. The cesya is lowered. The cesya is tuscan. The cesya ache the noellyn. The cesya recognize the noellyn. The noellyn is bicoloured. The noellyn ache the yonina. The noellyn lignify the cesya. The noellyn recognize the yonina. The yonina is unerect. The yonina is bicoloured. The yonina is lowered. The yonina ache the noellyn. The yonina recognize the cesya. The yonina recognize the noellyn. If someone is unerect then they do not need the yonina. All unerect people are webby. If the yonina is not tuscan then the yonina lignify the cesya. If someone recognize the noellyn and they do not need the yonina then the noellyn lignify the yonina. If someone recognize the noellyn and they do not see the cesya then they do not visit the cesya. If someone lignify the cesya and they do not visit the cesya then they see the yonina. The cesya does not visit the cesya.", "logic": "\nBicoloured(cesya)\nLowered(cesya)\nTuscan(cesya)\nAche(cesya, noellyn)\nRecognize(cesya, noellyn)\nBicoloured(noellyn)\nAche(noellyn, yonina)\nLignify(noellyn, cesya)\nRecognize(noellyn, yonina)\nUnerect(yonina)\nBicoloured(yonina)\nLowered(yonina)\nAche(yonina, noellyn)\nRecognize(yonina, cesya)\nRecognize(yonina, noellyn)\nforall x (Unerect(x) -> not Ache(x, yonina))\nforall x (Unerect(x) -> Webby(x))\nnot Tuscan(yonina) -> Lignify(yonina, cesya)\nforall x (Recognize(x, noellyn) and not Ache(x, yonina) -> Lignify(noellyn, yonina))\nforall x (Recognize(x, noellyn) and not Lignify(x, cesya) -> not Recognize(x, cesya))\nforall x (Lignify(x, cesya) and not Recognize(x, cesya) -> Lignify(x, yonina))\n\nnot Recognize(cesya, cesya)\n\nnot Recognize(cesya, cesya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The nelli is lustreless. The nelli is canonist. The nelli is aglitter. The nelli character the hadley. The nelli reiterate the hadley. The hadley is lustreless. The hadley character the len. The hadley tarry the nelli. The hadley reiterate the len. The len is obligated. The len is lustreless. The len is canonist. The len character the hadley. The len reiterate the nelli. The len reiterate the hadley. If someone is obligated then they do not need the len. All obligated people are turgid. If the len is not aglitter then the len tarry the nelli. If someone reiterate the hadley and they do not need the len then the hadley tarry the len. If someone reiterate the hadley and they do not see the nelli then they do not visit the nelli. If someone tarry the nelli and they do not visit the nelli then they see the len. The len tarry the hadley.", "logic": "\nLustreless(nelli)\nCanonist(nelli)\nAglitter(nelli)\nCharacter(nelli, hadley)\nReiterate(nelli, hadley)\nLustreless(hadley)\nCharacter(hadley, len)\nTarry(hadley, nelli)\nReiterate(hadley, len)\nObligated(len)\nLustreless(len)\nCanonist(len)\nCharacter(len, hadley)\nReiterate(len, nelli)\nReiterate(len, hadley)\nforall x (Obligated(x) -> not Character(x, len))\nforall x (Obligated(x) -> Turgid(x))\nnot Aglitter(len) -> Tarry(len, nelli)\nforall x (Reiterate(x, hadley) and not Character(x, len) -> Tarry(hadley, len))\nforall x (Reiterate(x, hadley) and not Tarry(x, nelli) -> not Reiterate(x, nelli))\nforall x (Tarry(x, nelli) and not Reiterate(x, nelli) -> Tarry(x, len))\n\nTarry(len, hadley)\n\nTarry(len, hadley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-87"} {"premises": "The murdoch becalm the hanny. The murdoch is impuissant. The murdoch is headed. The murdoch is not creative. The murdoch is zygodactyl. The murdoch does not like the hanny. The murdoch spectate the hanny. The hanny becalm the murdoch. The hanny is revived. The hanny is impuissant. The hanny is headed. The hanny is creative. The hanny is zygodactyl. The hanny splash the murdoch. The hanny spectate the murdoch. If the hanny spectate the murdoch then the murdoch does not like the hanny. If something becalm the hanny and it is not zygodactyl then it does not need the hanny. If something becalm the hanny and it splash the hanny then the hanny becalm the murdoch. If something splash the murdoch then the murdoch is revived. If something is revived then it becalm the murdoch. If something is headed and it does not need the hanny then it is creative. If the hanny is impuissant and the hanny becalm the murdoch then the hanny splash the murdoch. If something is creative and it spectate the hanny then the hanny splash the murdoch. The hanny spectate the murdoch.", "logic": "\nBecalm(murdoch, hanny)\nImpuissant(murdoch)\nHeaded(murdoch)\nnot Creative(murdoch)\nZygodactyl(murdoch)\nnot Splash(murdoch, hanny)\nSpectate(murdoch, hanny)\nBecalm(hanny, murdoch)\nRevived(hanny)\nImpuissant(hanny)\nHeaded(hanny)\nCreative(hanny)\nZygodactyl(hanny)\nSplash(hanny, murdoch)\nSpectate(hanny, murdoch)\nSpectate(hanny, murdoch) -> not Splash(murdoch, hanny)\nforall x (Becalm(x, hanny) and not Zygodactyl(x) -> not Spectate(x, hanny))\nforall x (Becalm(x, hanny) and Splash(x, hanny) -> Becalm(hanny, murdoch))\nforall x (Splash(x, murdoch) -> Revived(murdoch))\nforall x (Revived(x) -> Becalm(x, murdoch))\nforall x (Headed(x) and not Spectate(x, hanny) -> Creative(x))\nImpuissant(hanny) and Becalm(hanny, murdoch) -> Splash(hanny, murdoch)\nforall x (Creative(x) and Spectate(x, hanny) -> Splash(hanny, murdoch))\n\nSpectate(hanny, murdoch)\n\ntherefore Spectate(hanny, murdoch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The daren dread the toinette. The daren is cubital. The daren is baleful. The daren is not bermudan. The daren is unfledged. The daren does not like the toinette. The daren bolshevize the toinette. The toinette dread the daren. The toinette is glaciated. The toinette is cubital. The toinette is baleful. The toinette is bermudan. The toinette is unfledged. The toinette salute the daren. The toinette bolshevize the daren. If the toinette bolshevize the daren then the daren does not like the toinette. If something dread the toinette and it is not unfledged then it does not need the toinette. If something dread the toinette and it salute the toinette then the toinette dread the daren. If something salute the daren then the daren is glaciated. If something is glaciated then it dread the daren. If something is baleful and it does not need the toinette then it is bermudan. If the toinette is cubital and the toinette dread the daren then the toinette salute the daren. If something is bermudan and it bolshevize the toinette then the toinette salute the daren. The toinette does not like the daren.", "logic": "\nDread(daren, toinette)\nCubital(daren)\nBaleful(daren)\nnot Bermudan(daren)\nUnfledged(daren)\nnot Salute(daren, toinette)\nBolshevize(daren, toinette)\nDread(toinette, daren)\nGlaciated(toinette)\nCubital(toinette)\nBaleful(toinette)\nBermudan(toinette)\nUnfledged(toinette)\nSalute(toinette, daren)\nBolshevize(toinette, daren)\nBolshevize(toinette, daren) -> not Salute(daren, toinette)\nforall x (Dread(x, toinette) and not Unfledged(x) -> not Bolshevize(x, toinette))\nforall x (Dread(x, toinette) and Salute(x, toinette) -> Dread(toinette, daren))\nforall x (Salute(x, daren) -> Glaciated(daren))\nforall x (Glaciated(x) -> Dread(x, daren))\nforall x (Baleful(x) and not Bolshevize(x, toinette) -> Bermudan(x))\nCubital(toinette) and Dread(toinette, daren) -> Salute(toinette, daren)\nforall x (Bermudan(x) and Bolshevize(x, toinette) -> Salute(toinette, daren))\n\nnot Salute(toinette, daren)\n\ntherefore Salute(toinette, daren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The melvyn utter the ulrika. The melvyn is branchial. The melvyn is motivated. The melvyn is not cochlear. The melvyn is allied. The melvyn does not like the ulrika. The melvyn okay the ulrika. The ulrika utter the melvyn. The ulrika is collected. The ulrika is branchial. The ulrika is motivated. The ulrika is cochlear. The ulrika is allied. The ulrika transfuse the melvyn. The ulrika okay the melvyn. If the ulrika okay the melvyn then the melvyn does not like the ulrika. If something utter the ulrika and it is not allied then it does not need the ulrika. If something utter the ulrika and it transfuse the ulrika then the ulrika utter the melvyn. If something transfuse the melvyn then the melvyn is collected. If something is collected then it utter the melvyn. If something is motivated and it does not need the ulrika then it is cochlear. If the ulrika is branchial and the ulrika utter the melvyn then the ulrika transfuse the melvyn. If something is cochlear and it okay the ulrika then the ulrika transfuse the melvyn. The melvyn is collected.", "logic": "\nUtter(melvyn, ulrika)\nBranchial(melvyn)\nMotivated(melvyn)\nnot Cochlear(melvyn)\nAllied(melvyn)\nnot Transfuse(melvyn, ulrika)\nOkay(melvyn, ulrika)\nUtter(ulrika, melvyn)\nCollected(ulrika)\nBranchial(ulrika)\nMotivated(ulrika)\nCochlear(ulrika)\nAllied(ulrika)\nTransfuse(ulrika, melvyn)\nOkay(ulrika, melvyn)\nOkay(ulrika, melvyn) -> not Transfuse(melvyn, ulrika)\nforall x (Utter(x, ulrika) and not Allied(x) -> not Okay(x, ulrika))\nforall x (Utter(x, ulrika) and Transfuse(x, ulrika) -> Utter(ulrika, melvyn))\nforall x (Transfuse(x, melvyn) -> Collected(melvyn))\nforall x (Collected(x) -> Utter(x, melvyn))\nforall x (Motivated(x) and not Okay(x, ulrika) -> Cochlear(x))\nBranchial(ulrika) and Utter(ulrika, melvyn) -> Transfuse(ulrika, melvyn)\nforall x (Cochlear(x) and Okay(x, ulrika) -> Transfuse(ulrika, melvyn))\n\nCollected(melvyn)\n\nTransfuse(ulrika, melvyn) and forall x (Transfuse(x, melvyn) -> Collected(melvyn)) -> therefore Collected(melvyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The evelina jimmy the melamie. The evelina is sottish. The evelina is beamish. The evelina is not talkative. The evelina is satiable. The evelina does not like the melamie. The evelina discharge the melamie. The melamie jimmy the evelina. The melamie is prefaded. The melamie is sottish. The melamie is beamish. The melamie is talkative. The melamie is satiable. The melamie spatchcock the evelina. The melamie discharge the evelina. If the melamie discharge the evelina then the evelina does not like the melamie. If something jimmy the melamie and it is not satiable then it does not need the melamie. If something jimmy the melamie and it spatchcock the melamie then the melamie jimmy the evelina. If something spatchcock the evelina then the evelina is prefaded. If something is prefaded then it jimmy the evelina. If something is beamish and it does not need the melamie then it is talkative. If the melamie is sottish and the melamie jimmy the evelina then the melamie spatchcock the evelina. If something is talkative and it discharge the melamie then the melamie spatchcock the evelina. The evelina is not prefaded.", "logic": "\nJimmy(evelina, melamie)\nSottish(evelina)\nBeamish(evelina)\nnot Talkative(evelina)\nSatiable(evelina)\nnot Spatchcock(evelina, melamie)\nDischarge(evelina, melamie)\nJimmy(melamie, evelina)\nPrefaded(melamie)\nSottish(melamie)\nBeamish(melamie)\nTalkative(melamie)\nSatiable(melamie)\nSpatchcock(melamie, evelina)\nDischarge(melamie, evelina)\nDischarge(melamie, evelina) -> not Spatchcock(evelina, melamie)\nforall x (Jimmy(x, melamie) and not Satiable(x) -> not Discharge(x, melamie))\nforall x (Jimmy(x, melamie) and Spatchcock(x, melamie) -> Jimmy(melamie, evelina))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, evelina) -> Prefaded(evelina))\nforall x (Prefaded(x) -> Jimmy(x, evelina))\nforall x (Beamish(x) and not Discharge(x, melamie) -> Talkative(x))\nSottish(melamie) and Jimmy(melamie, evelina) -> Spatchcock(melamie, evelina)\nforall x (Talkative(x) and Discharge(x, melamie) -> Spatchcock(melamie, evelina))\n\nnot Prefaded(evelina)\n\nSpatchcock(melamie, evelina) and forall x (Spatchcock(x, evelina) -> Prefaded(evelina)) -> therefore Prefaded(evelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The son flatter the vanya. The son is southmost. The son is hindmost. The son is not cognate. The son is ceramic. The son does not like the vanya. The son mercerize the vanya. The vanya flatter the son. The vanya is catalytic. The vanya is southmost. The vanya is hindmost. The vanya is cognate. The vanya is ceramic. The vanya consume the son. The vanya mercerize the son. If the vanya mercerize the son then the son does not like the vanya. If something flatter the vanya and it is not ceramic then it does not need the vanya. If something flatter the vanya and it consume the vanya then the vanya flatter the son. If something consume the son then the son is catalytic. If something is catalytic then it flatter the son. If something is hindmost and it does not need the vanya then it is cognate. If the vanya is southmost and the vanya flatter the son then the vanya consume the son. If something is cognate and it mercerize the vanya then the vanya consume the son. The son flatter the son.", "logic": "\nFlatter(son, vanya)\nSouthmost(son)\nHindmost(son)\nnot Cognate(son)\nCeramic(son)\nnot Consume(son, vanya)\nMercerize(son, vanya)\nFlatter(vanya, son)\nCatalytic(vanya)\nSouthmost(vanya)\nHindmost(vanya)\nCognate(vanya)\nCeramic(vanya)\nConsume(vanya, son)\nMercerize(vanya, son)\nMercerize(vanya, son) -> not Consume(son, vanya)\nforall x (Flatter(x, vanya) and not Ceramic(x) -> not Mercerize(x, vanya))\nforall x (Flatter(x, vanya) and Consume(x, vanya) -> Flatter(vanya, son))\nforall x (Consume(x, son) -> Catalytic(son))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) -> Flatter(x, son))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) and not Mercerize(x, vanya) -> Cognate(x))\nSouthmost(vanya) and Flatter(vanya, son) -> Consume(vanya, son)\nforall x (Cognate(x) and Mercerize(x, vanya) -> Consume(vanya, son))\n\nFlatter(son, son)\n\nConsume(vanya, son) and forall x (Consume(x, son) -> Catalytic(son)) -> therefore Catalytic(son) Catalytic(son) and forall x (Catalytic(x) -> Flatter(x, son)) -> therefore Flatter(son, son)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The forster project the yovonnda. The forster is busybodied. The forster is antlered. The forster is not attended. The forster is semiarid. The forster does not like the yovonnda. The forster rivet the yovonnda. The yovonnda project the forster. The yovonnda is arciform. The yovonnda is busybodied. The yovonnda is antlered. The yovonnda is attended. The yovonnda is semiarid. The yovonnda whistle the forster. The yovonnda rivet the forster. If the yovonnda rivet the forster then the forster does not like the yovonnda. If something project the yovonnda and it is not semiarid then it does not need the yovonnda. If something project the yovonnda and it whistle the yovonnda then the yovonnda project the forster. If something whistle the forster then the forster is arciform. If something is arciform then it project the forster. If something is antlered and it does not need the yovonnda then it is attended. If the yovonnda is busybodied and the yovonnda project the forster then the yovonnda whistle the forster. If something is attended and it rivet the yovonnda then the yovonnda whistle the forster. The forster does not eat the forster.", "logic": "\nProject(forster, yovonnda)\nBusybodied(forster)\nAntlered(forster)\nnot Attended(forster)\nSemiarid(forster)\nnot Whistle(forster, yovonnda)\nRivet(forster, yovonnda)\nProject(yovonnda, forster)\nArciform(yovonnda)\nBusybodied(yovonnda)\nAntlered(yovonnda)\nAttended(yovonnda)\nSemiarid(yovonnda)\nWhistle(yovonnda, forster)\nRivet(yovonnda, forster)\nRivet(yovonnda, forster) -> not Whistle(forster, yovonnda)\nforall x (Project(x, yovonnda) and not Semiarid(x) -> not Rivet(x, yovonnda))\nforall x (Project(x, yovonnda) and Whistle(x, yovonnda) -> Project(yovonnda, forster))\nforall x (Whistle(x, forster) -> Arciform(forster))\nforall x (Arciform(x) -> Project(x, forster))\nforall x (Antlered(x) and not Rivet(x, yovonnda) -> Attended(x))\nBusybodied(yovonnda) and Project(yovonnda, forster) -> Whistle(yovonnda, forster)\nforall x (Attended(x) and Rivet(x, yovonnda) -> Whistle(yovonnda, forster))\n\nnot Project(forster, forster)\n\nWhistle(yovonnda, forster) and forall x (Whistle(x, forster) -> Arciform(forster)) -> therefore Arciform(forster) Arciform(forster) and forall x (Arciform(x) -> Project(x, forster)) -> therefore Project(forster, forster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The delmar reshoot the kylynn. The delmar is alabaster. The delmar is fucking. The delmar is not astonied. The delmar is aeronautic. The delmar does not like the kylynn. The delmar maul the kylynn. The kylynn reshoot the delmar. The kylynn is thumbed. The kylynn is alabaster. The kylynn is fucking. The kylynn is astonied. The kylynn is aeronautic. The kylynn await the delmar. The kylynn maul the delmar. If the kylynn maul the delmar then the delmar does not like the kylynn. If something reshoot the kylynn and it is not aeronautic then it does not need the kylynn. If something reshoot the kylynn and it await the kylynn then the kylynn reshoot the delmar. If something await the delmar then the delmar is thumbed. If something is thumbed then it reshoot the delmar. If something is fucking and it does not need the kylynn then it is astonied. If the kylynn is alabaster and the kylynn reshoot the delmar then the kylynn await the delmar. If something is astonied and it maul the kylynn then the kylynn await the delmar. The delmar does not like the delmar.", "logic": "\nReshoot(delmar, kylynn)\nAlabaster(delmar)\nFucking(delmar)\nnot Astonied(delmar)\nAeronautic(delmar)\nnot Await(delmar, kylynn)\nMaul(delmar, kylynn)\nReshoot(kylynn, delmar)\nThumbed(kylynn)\nAlabaster(kylynn)\nFucking(kylynn)\nAstonied(kylynn)\nAeronautic(kylynn)\nAwait(kylynn, delmar)\nMaul(kylynn, delmar)\nMaul(kylynn, delmar) -> not Await(delmar, kylynn)\nforall x (Reshoot(x, kylynn) and not Aeronautic(x) -> not Maul(x, kylynn))\nforall x (Reshoot(x, kylynn) and Await(x, kylynn) -> Reshoot(kylynn, delmar))\nforall x (Await(x, delmar) -> Thumbed(delmar))\nforall x (Thumbed(x) -> Reshoot(x, delmar))\nforall x (Fucking(x) and not Maul(x, kylynn) -> Astonied(x))\nAlabaster(kylynn) and Reshoot(kylynn, delmar) -> Await(kylynn, delmar)\nforall x (Astonied(x) and Maul(x, kylynn) -> Await(kylynn, delmar))\n\nnot Await(delmar, delmar)\n\nnot Await(delmar, delmar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The bellamy crick the socrates. The bellamy is statuary. The bellamy is punishing. The bellamy is not uproarious. The bellamy is diminutive. The bellamy does not like the socrates. The bellamy relish the socrates. The socrates crick the bellamy. The socrates is painful. The socrates is statuary. The socrates is punishing. The socrates is uproarious. The socrates is diminutive. The socrates lurch the bellamy. The socrates relish the bellamy. If the socrates relish the bellamy then the bellamy does not like the socrates. If something crick the socrates and it is not diminutive then it does not need the socrates. If something crick the socrates and it lurch the socrates then the socrates crick the bellamy. If something lurch the bellamy then the bellamy is painful. If something is painful then it crick the bellamy. If something is punishing and it does not need the socrates then it is uproarious. If the socrates is statuary and the socrates crick the bellamy then the socrates lurch the bellamy. If something is uproarious and it relish the socrates then the socrates lurch the bellamy. The socrates crick the socrates.", "logic": "\nCrick(bellamy, socrates)\nStatuary(bellamy)\nPunishing(bellamy)\nnot Uproarious(bellamy)\nDiminutive(bellamy)\nnot Lurch(bellamy, socrates)\nRelish(bellamy, socrates)\nCrick(socrates, bellamy)\nPainful(socrates)\nStatuary(socrates)\nPunishing(socrates)\nUproarious(socrates)\nDiminutive(socrates)\nLurch(socrates, bellamy)\nRelish(socrates, bellamy)\nRelish(socrates, bellamy) -> not Lurch(bellamy, socrates)\nforall x (Crick(x, socrates) and not Diminutive(x) -> not Relish(x, socrates))\nforall x (Crick(x, socrates) and Lurch(x, socrates) -> Crick(socrates, bellamy))\nforall x (Lurch(x, bellamy) -> Painful(bellamy))\nforall x (Painful(x) -> Crick(x, bellamy))\nforall x (Punishing(x) and not Relish(x, socrates) -> Uproarious(x))\nStatuary(socrates) and Crick(socrates, bellamy) -> Lurch(socrates, bellamy)\nforall x (Uproarious(x) and Relish(x, socrates) -> Lurch(socrates, bellamy))\n\nCrick(socrates, socrates)\n\nCrick(socrates, socrates) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The regina branch the tirrell. The regina is toxicant. The regina is mythic. The regina is not clad. The regina is altissimo. The regina does not like the tirrell. The regina rubric the tirrell. The tirrell branch the regina. The tirrell is drippy. The tirrell is toxicant. The tirrell is mythic. The tirrell is clad. The tirrell is altissimo. The tirrell savour the regina. The tirrell rubric the regina. If the tirrell rubric the regina then the regina does not like the tirrell. If something branch the tirrell and it is not altissimo then it does not need the tirrell. If something branch the tirrell and it savour the tirrell then the tirrell branch the regina. If something savour the regina then the regina is drippy. If something is drippy then it branch the regina. If something is mythic and it does not need the tirrell then it is clad. If the tirrell is toxicant and the tirrell branch the regina then the tirrell savour the regina. If something is clad and it rubric the tirrell then the tirrell savour the regina. The tirrell does not need the tirrell.", "logic": "\nBranch(regina, tirrell)\nToxicant(regina)\nMythic(regina)\nnot Clad(regina)\nAltissimo(regina)\nnot Savour(regina, tirrell)\nRubric(regina, tirrell)\nBranch(tirrell, regina)\nDrippy(tirrell)\nToxicant(tirrell)\nMythic(tirrell)\nClad(tirrell)\nAltissimo(tirrell)\nSavour(tirrell, regina)\nRubric(tirrell, regina)\nRubric(tirrell, regina) -> not Savour(regina, tirrell)\nforall x (Branch(x, tirrell) and not Altissimo(x) -> not Rubric(x, tirrell))\nforall x (Branch(x, tirrell) and Savour(x, tirrell) -> Branch(tirrell, regina))\nforall x (Savour(x, regina) -> Drippy(regina))\nforall x (Drippy(x) -> Branch(x, regina))\nforall x (Mythic(x) and not Rubric(x, tirrell) -> Clad(x))\nToxicant(tirrell) and Branch(tirrell, regina) -> Savour(tirrell, regina)\nforall x (Clad(x) and Rubric(x, tirrell) -> Savour(tirrell, regina))\n\nnot Rubric(tirrell, tirrell)\n\nnot Rubric(tirrell, tirrell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The dacy gorge the tommi. The dacy is nonlinear. The dacy is elemental. The dacy is not hitless. The dacy is plucked. The dacy does not like the tommi. The dacy ally the tommi. The tommi gorge the dacy. The tommi is ideologic. The tommi is nonlinear. The tommi is elemental. The tommi is hitless. The tommi is plucked. The tommi chastise the dacy. The tommi ally the dacy. If the tommi ally the dacy then the dacy does not like the tommi. If something gorge the tommi and it is not plucked then it does not need the tommi. If something gorge the tommi and it chastise the tommi then the tommi gorge the dacy. If something chastise the dacy then the dacy is ideologic. If something is ideologic then it gorge the dacy. If something is elemental and it does not need the tommi then it is hitless. If the tommi is nonlinear and the tommi gorge the dacy then the tommi chastise the dacy. If something is hitless and it ally the tommi then the tommi chastise the dacy. The dacy ally the dacy.", "logic": "\nGorge(dacy, tommi)\nNonlinear(dacy)\nElemental(dacy)\nnot Hitless(dacy)\nPlucked(dacy)\nnot Chastise(dacy, tommi)\nAlly(dacy, tommi)\nGorge(tommi, dacy)\nIdeologic(tommi)\nNonlinear(tommi)\nElemental(tommi)\nHitless(tommi)\nPlucked(tommi)\nChastise(tommi, dacy)\nAlly(tommi, dacy)\nAlly(tommi, dacy) -> not Chastise(dacy, tommi)\nforall x (Gorge(x, tommi) and not Plucked(x) -> not Ally(x, tommi))\nforall x (Gorge(x, tommi) and Chastise(x, tommi) -> Gorge(tommi, dacy))\nforall x (Chastise(x, dacy) -> Ideologic(dacy))\nforall x (Ideologic(x) -> Gorge(x, dacy))\nforall x (Elemental(x) and not Ally(x, tommi) -> Hitless(x))\nNonlinear(tommi) and Gorge(tommi, dacy) -> Chastise(tommi, dacy)\nforall x (Hitless(x) and Ally(x, tommi) -> Chastise(tommi, dacy))\n\nAlly(dacy, dacy)\n\nAlly(dacy, dacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The lynett lowball the tiffy. The lynett is infuriated. The lynett is antidromic. The lynett is bereft. The lynett torpedo the odille. The lynett escape the odille. The odille escape the tiffy. The tiffy is demeaning. The tiffy escape the lynett. The emmaline lowball the lynett. The emmaline lowball the odille. The emmaline lowball the tiffy. If something torpedo the lynett then it lowball the odille. If something is antidromic then it torpedo the lynett. The tiffy escape the lynett.", "logic": "\nLowball(lynett, tiffy)\nInfuriated(lynett)\nAntidromic(lynett)\nBereft(lynett)\nTorpedo(lynett, odille)\nEscape(lynett, odille)\nEscape(odille, tiffy)\nDemeaning(tiffy)\nEscape(tiffy, lynett)\nLowball(emmaline, lynett)\nLowball(emmaline, odille)\nLowball(emmaline, tiffy)\nforall x (Torpedo(x, lynett) -> Lowball(x, odille))\nforall x (Antidromic(x) -> Torpedo(x, lynett))\n\nEscape(tiffy, lynett)\n\ntherefore Escape(tiffy, lynett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The hans stage the goldarina. The hans is classical. The hans is comal. The hans is zionist. The hans quieten the lennie. The hans diffract the lennie. The lennie diffract the goldarina. The goldarina is malthusian. The goldarina diffract the hans. The theodoric stage the hans. The theodoric stage the lennie. The theodoric stage the goldarina. If something quieten the hans then it stage the lennie. If something is comal then it quieten the hans. The theodoric does not chase the hans.", "logic": "\nStage(hans, goldarina)\nClassical(hans)\nComal(hans)\nZionist(hans)\nQuieten(hans, lennie)\nDiffract(hans, lennie)\nDiffract(lennie, goldarina)\nMalthusian(goldarina)\nDiffract(goldarina, hans)\nStage(theodoric, hans)\nStage(theodoric, lennie)\nStage(theodoric, goldarina)\nforall x (Quieten(x, hans) -> Stage(x, lennie))\nforall x (Comal(x) -> Quieten(x, hans))\n\nnot Stage(theodoric, hans)\n\ntherefore Stage(theodoric, hans)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The chevy amass the darin. The chevy is burbling. The chevy is enlivened. The chevy is swishy. The chevy jiggle the emmaline. The chevy stroll the emmaline. The emmaline stroll the darin. The darin is voltarian. The darin stroll the chevy. The dianna amass the chevy. The dianna amass the emmaline. The dianna amass the darin. If something jiggle the chevy then it amass the emmaline. If something is enlivened then it jiggle the chevy. The chevy jiggle the chevy.", "logic": "\nAmass(chevy, darin)\nBurbling(chevy)\nEnlivened(chevy)\nSwishy(chevy)\nJiggle(chevy, emmaline)\nStroll(chevy, emmaline)\nStroll(emmaline, darin)\nVoltarian(darin)\nStroll(darin, chevy)\nAmass(dianna, chevy)\nAmass(dianna, emmaline)\nAmass(dianna, darin)\nforall x (Jiggle(x, chevy) -> Amass(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Enlivened(x) -> Jiggle(x, chevy))\n\nJiggle(chevy, chevy)\n\nEnlivened(chevy) and forall x (Enlivened(x) -> Jiggle(x, chevy)) -> therefore Jiggle(chevy, chevy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The erinna damn the perrine. The erinna is amphoteric. The erinna is believable. The erinna is lesser. The erinna glamour the reginald. The erinna overtax the reginald. The reginald overtax the perrine. The perrine is astrocytic. The perrine overtax the erinna. The margarita damn the erinna. The margarita damn the reginald. The margarita damn the perrine. If something glamour the erinna then it damn the reginald. If something is believable then it glamour the erinna. The erinna does not see the erinna.", "logic": "\nDamn(erinna, perrine)\nAmphoteric(erinna)\nBelievable(erinna)\nLesser(erinna)\nGlamour(erinna, reginald)\nOvertax(erinna, reginald)\nOvertax(reginald, perrine)\nAstrocytic(perrine)\nOvertax(perrine, erinna)\nDamn(margarita, erinna)\nDamn(margarita, reginald)\nDamn(margarita, perrine)\nforall x (Glamour(x, erinna) -> Damn(x, reginald))\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Glamour(x, erinna))\n\nnot Glamour(erinna, erinna)\n\nBelievable(erinna) and forall x (Believable(x) -> Glamour(x, erinna)) -> therefore Glamour(erinna, erinna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The derrin douche the danna. The derrin is uncritical. The derrin is lovelorn. The derrin is splenic. The derrin siphon the sib. The derrin tender the sib. The sib tender the danna. The danna is ephesian. The danna tender the derrin. The katinka douche the derrin. The katinka douche the sib. The katinka douche the danna. If something siphon the derrin then it douche the sib. If something is lovelorn then it siphon the derrin. The derrin douche the sib.", "logic": "\nDouche(derrin, danna)\nUncritical(derrin)\nLovelorn(derrin)\nSplenic(derrin)\nSiphon(derrin, sib)\nTender(derrin, sib)\nTender(sib, danna)\nEphesian(danna)\nTender(danna, derrin)\nDouche(katinka, derrin)\nDouche(katinka, sib)\nDouche(katinka, danna)\nforall x (Siphon(x, derrin) -> Douche(x, sib))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Siphon(x, derrin))\n\nDouche(derrin, sib)\n\nLovelorn(derrin) and forall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Siphon(x, derrin)) -> therefore Siphon(derrin, derrin) Siphon(derrin, derrin) and forall x (Siphon(x, derrin) -> Douche(x, sib)) -> therefore Douche(derrin, sib)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The douglass theme the paola. The douglass is tufted. The douglass is wily. The douglass is basic. The douglass crescendo the ashlen. The douglass brood the ashlen. The ashlen brood the paola. The paola is jittering. The paola brood the douglass. The norman theme the douglass. The norman theme the ashlen. The norman theme the paola. If something crescendo the douglass then it theme the ashlen. If something is wily then it crescendo the douglass. The douglass does not chase the ashlen.", "logic": "\nTheme(douglass, paola)\nTufted(douglass)\nWily(douglass)\nBasic(douglass)\nCrescendo(douglass, ashlen)\nBrood(douglass, ashlen)\nBrood(ashlen, paola)\nJittering(paola)\nBrood(paola, douglass)\nTheme(norman, douglass)\nTheme(norman, ashlen)\nTheme(norman, paola)\nforall x (Crescendo(x, douglass) -> Theme(x, ashlen))\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Crescendo(x, douglass))\n\nnot Theme(douglass, ashlen)\n\nWily(douglass) and forall x (Wily(x) -> Crescendo(x, douglass)) -> therefore Crescendo(douglass, douglass) Crescendo(douglass, douglass) and forall x (Crescendo(x, douglass) -> Theme(x, ashlen)) -> therefore Theme(douglass, ashlen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The grata scream the caesar. The grata is spatial. The grata is fired. The grata is bisexual. The grata giggle the kennedy. The grata crab the kennedy. The kennedy crab the caesar. The caesar is collegial. The caesar crab the grata. The kassandra scream the grata. The kassandra scream the kennedy. The kassandra scream the caesar. If something giggle the grata then it scream the kennedy. If something is fired then it giggle the grata. The caesar does not see the grata.", "logic": "\nScream(grata, caesar)\nSpatial(grata)\nFired(grata)\nBisexual(grata)\nGiggle(grata, kennedy)\nCrab(grata, kennedy)\nCrab(kennedy, caesar)\nCollegial(caesar)\nCrab(caesar, grata)\nScream(kassandra, grata)\nScream(kassandra, kennedy)\nScream(kassandra, caesar)\nforall x (Giggle(x, grata) -> Scream(x, kennedy))\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Giggle(x, grata))\n\nnot Giggle(caesar, grata)\n\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Giggle(x, grata)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The wilone impute the smith. The wilone is unmoving. The wilone is pyrrhic. The wilone is surreal. The wilone keratinize the sayer. The wilone coronate the sayer. The sayer coronate the smith. The smith is risen. The smith coronate the wilone. The melloney impute the wilone. The melloney impute the sayer. The melloney impute the smith. If something keratinize the wilone then it impute the sayer. If something is pyrrhic then it keratinize the wilone. The smith impute the sayer.", "logic": "\nImpute(wilone, smith)\nUnmoving(wilone)\nPyrrhic(wilone)\nSurreal(wilone)\nKeratinize(wilone, sayer)\nCoronate(wilone, sayer)\nCoronate(sayer, smith)\nRisen(smith)\nCoronate(smith, wilone)\nImpute(melloney, wilone)\nImpute(melloney, sayer)\nImpute(melloney, smith)\nforall x (Keratinize(x, wilone) -> Impute(x, sayer))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) -> Keratinize(x, wilone))\n\nImpute(smith, sayer)\n\nforall x (Keratinize(x, wilone) -> Impute(x, sayer)) <- forall x (Pyrrhic(x) -> Keratinize(x, wilone)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The vivienne tenure the geo. The vivienne is masted. The vivienne is unanswered. The vivienne is rimed. The vivienne drub the rowe. The vivienne lour the rowe. The rowe lour the geo. The geo is flyaway. The geo lour the vivienne. The fortuna tenure the vivienne. The fortuna tenure the rowe. The fortuna tenure the geo. If something drub the vivienne then it tenure the rowe. If something is unanswered then it drub the vivienne. The rowe does not chase the rowe.", "logic": "\nTenure(vivienne, geo)\nMasted(vivienne)\nUnanswered(vivienne)\nRimed(vivienne)\nDrub(vivienne, rowe)\nLour(vivienne, rowe)\nLour(rowe, geo)\nFlyaway(geo)\nLour(geo, vivienne)\nTenure(fortuna, vivienne)\nTenure(fortuna, rowe)\nTenure(fortuna, geo)\nforall x (Drub(x, vivienne) -> Tenure(x, rowe))\nforall x (Unanswered(x) -> Drub(x, vivienne))\n\nnot Tenure(rowe, rowe)\n\nforall x (Drub(x, vivienne) -> Tenure(x, rowe)) <- forall x (Unanswered(x) -> Drub(x, vivienne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The umberto scrounge the hamnet. The umberto is functional. The umberto is gregarious. The umberto is complacent. The umberto skateboard the otho. The umberto presuppose the otho. The otho presuppose the hamnet. The hamnet is anticipant. The hamnet presuppose the umberto. The dena scrounge the umberto. The dena scrounge the otho. The dena scrounge the hamnet. If something skateboard the umberto then it scrounge the otho. If something is gregarious then it skateboard the umberto. The dena presuppose the umberto.", "logic": "\nScrounge(umberto, hamnet)\nFunctional(umberto)\nGregarious(umberto)\nComplacent(umberto)\nSkateboard(umberto, otho)\nPresuppose(umberto, otho)\nPresuppose(otho, hamnet)\nAnticipant(hamnet)\nPresuppose(hamnet, umberto)\nScrounge(dena, umberto)\nScrounge(dena, otho)\nScrounge(dena, hamnet)\nforall x (Skateboard(x, umberto) -> Scrounge(x, otho))\nforall x (Gregarious(x) -> Skateboard(x, umberto))\n\nPresuppose(dena, umberto)\n\nPresuppose(dena, umberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The gen dabble the aphrodite. The gen is impellent. The gen is moslem. The gen is deaf. The gen advertise the karine. The gen rubberise the karine. The karine rubberise the aphrodite. The aphrodite is spaced. The aphrodite rubberise the gen. The camel dabble the gen. The camel dabble the karine. The camel dabble the aphrodite. If something advertise the gen then it dabble the karine. If something is moslem then it advertise the gen. The aphrodite is not deaf.", "logic": "\nDabble(gen, aphrodite)\nImpellent(gen)\nMoslem(gen)\nDeaf(gen)\nAdvertise(gen, karine)\nRubberise(gen, karine)\nRubberise(karine, aphrodite)\nSpaced(aphrodite)\nRubberise(aphrodite, gen)\nDabble(camel, gen)\nDabble(camel, karine)\nDabble(camel, aphrodite)\nforall x (Advertise(x, gen) -> Dabble(x, karine))\nforall x (Moslem(x) -> Advertise(x, gen))\n\nnot Deaf(aphrodite)\n\nnot Deaf(aphrodite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The marris travesty the jacklyn. The marris is dietetic. The marris is anticancer. The marris is buff. The marris skive the salli. The marris slouch the salli. The salli slouch the jacklyn. The jacklyn is diarrhoeic. The jacklyn slouch the marris. The rosette travesty the marris. The rosette travesty the salli. The rosette travesty the jacklyn. If something skive the marris then it travesty the salli. If something is anticancer then it skive the marris. The rosette skive the salli.", "logic": "\nTravesty(marris, jacklyn)\nDietetic(marris)\nAnticancer(marris)\nBuff(marris)\nSkive(marris, salli)\nSlouch(marris, salli)\nSlouch(salli, jacklyn)\nDiarrhoeic(jacklyn)\nSlouch(jacklyn, marris)\nTravesty(rosette, marris)\nTravesty(rosette, salli)\nTravesty(rosette, jacklyn)\nforall x (Skive(x, marris) -> Travesty(x, salli))\nforall x (Anticancer(x) -> Skive(x, marris))\n\nSkive(rosette, salli)\n\nSkive(rosette, salli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The gisela snowshoe the jonathon. The gisela snowshoe the lulita. The gisela etiolate the jonathon. The gisela is excused. The gisela specialize the jonathon. The gisela specialize the lulita. The jonathon snowshoe the gisela. The jonathon etiolate the gisela. The jonathon etiolate the lulita. The jonathon is ceilinged. The lulita snowshoe the gisela. The lulita snowshoe the jonathon. The lulita etiolate the gisela. The lulita is excused. The lulita does not need the gisela. The lulita specialize the jonathon. If someone is american then they eat the gisela. If someone specialize the gisela and the gisela does not need the jonathon then the gisela is unpointed. If the lulita snowshoe the jonathon then the lulita is biloculate. If someone specialize the lulita then they are american. If someone specialize the lulita and the lulita is excused then the lulita does not need the gisela. If someone is ceilinged and they do not need the gisela then the gisela does not chase the jonathon. The jonathon etiolate the lulita.", "logic": "\nSnowshoe(gisela, jonathon)\nSnowshoe(gisela, lulita)\nEtiolate(gisela, jonathon)\nExcused(gisela)\nSpecialize(gisela, jonathon)\nSpecialize(gisela, lulita)\nSnowshoe(jonathon, gisela)\nEtiolate(jonathon, gisela)\nEtiolate(jonathon, lulita)\nCeilinged(jonathon)\nSnowshoe(lulita, gisela)\nSnowshoe(lulita, jonathon)\nEtiolate(lulita, gisela)\nExcused(lulita)\nnot Specialize(lulita, gisela)\nSpecialize(lulita, jonathon)\nforall x (American(x) -> Etiolate(x, gisela))\nforall x (Specialize(x, gisela) and not Specialize(gisela, jonathon) -> Unpointed(gisela))\nSnowshoe(lulita, jonathon) -> Biloculate(lulita)\nforall x (Specialize(x, lulita) -> American(x))\nforall x (Specialize(x, lulita) and Excused(lulita) -> not Specialize(lulita, gisela))\nforall x (Ceilinged(x) and not Specialize(x, gisela) -> not Snowshoe(gisela, jonathon))\n\nEtiolate(jonathon, lulita)\n\ntherefore Etiolate(jonathon, lulita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The aaron dive the fleur. The aaron dive the rosamund. The aaron transgress the fleur. The aaron is monolithic. The aaron hound the fleur. The aaron hound the rosamund. The fleur dive the aaron. The fleur transgress the aaron. The fleur transgress the rosamund. The fleur is greenside. The rosamund dive the aaron. The rosamund dive the fleur. The rosamund transgress the aaron. The rosamund is monolithic. The rosamund does not need the aaron. The rosamund hound the fleur. If someone is pyloric then they eat the aaron. If someone hound the aaron and the aaron does not need the fleur then the aaron is braggart. If the rosamund dive the fleur then the rosamund is liver. If someone hound the rosamund then they are pyloric. If someone hound the rosamund and the rosamund is monolithic then the rosamund does not need the aaron. If someone is greenside and they do not need the aaron then the aaron does not chase the fleur. The rosamund does not chase the aaron.", "logic": "\nDive(aaron, fleur)\nDive(aaron, rosamund)\nTransgress(aaron, fleur)\nMonolithic(aaron)\nHound(aaron, fleur)\nHound(aaron, rosamund)\nDive(fleur, aaron)\nTransgress(fleur, aaron)\nTransgress(fleur, rosamund)\nGreenside(fleur)\nDive(rosamund, aaron)\nDive(rosamund, fleur)\nTransgress(rosamund, aaron)\nMonolithic(rosamund)\nnot Hound(rosamund, aaron)\nHound(rosamund, fleur)\nforall x (Pyloric(x) -> Transgress(x, aaron))\nforall x (Hound(x, aaron) and not Hound(aaron, fleur) -> Braggart(aaron))\nDive(rosamund, fleur) -> Liver(rosamund)\nforall x (Hound(x, rosamund) -> Pyloric(x))\nforall x (Hound(x, rosamund) and Monolithic(rosamund) -> not Hound(rosamund, aaron))\nforall x (Greenside(x) and not Hound(x, aaron) -> not Dive(aaron, fleur))\n\nnot Dive(rosamund, aaron)\n\ntherefore Dive(rosamund, aaron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The jenn expunge the rennie. The jenn expunge the ericha. The jenn compile the rennie. The jenn is transeunt. The jenn slap the rennie. The jenn slap the ericha. The rennie expunge the jenn. The rennie compile the jenn. The rennie compile the ericha. The rennie is rickety. The ericha expunge the jenn. The ericha expunge the rennie. The ericha compile the jenn. The ericha is transeunt. The ericha does not need the jenn. The ericha slap the rennie. If someone is runaway then they eat the jenn. If someone slap the jenn and the jenn does not need the rennie then the jenn is avoidable. If the ericha expunge the rennie then the ericha is bohemian. If someone slap the ericha then they are runaway. If someone slap the ericha and the ericha is transeunt then the ericha does not need the jenn. If someone is rickety and they do not need the jenn then the jenn does not chase the rennie. The ericha is bohemian.", "logic": "\nExpunge(jenn, rennie)\nExpunge(jenn, ericha)\nCompile(jenn, rennie)\nTranseunt(jenn)\nSlap(jenn, rennie)\nSlap(jenn, ericha)\nExpunge(rennie, jenn)\nCompile(rennie, jenn)\nCompile(rennie, ericha)\nRickety(rennie)\nExpunge(ericha, jenn)\nExpunge(ericha, rennie)\nCompile(ericha, jenn)\nTranseunt(ericha)\nnot Slap(ericha, jenn)\nSlap(ericha, rennie)\nforall x (Runaway(x) -> Compile(x, jenn))\nforall x (Slap(x, jenn) and not Slap(jenn, rennie) -> Avoidable(jenn))\nExpunge(ericha, rennie) -> Bohemian(ericha)\nforall x (Slap(x, ericha) -> Runaway(x))\nforall x (Slap(x, ericha) and Transeunt(ericha) -> not Slap(ericha, jenn))\nforall x (Rickety(x) and not Slap(x, jenn) -> not Expunge(jenn, rennie))\n\nBohemian(ericha)\n\nExpunge(ericha, rennie) and Expunge(ericha, rennie) -> Bohemian(ericha) -> therefore Bohemian(ericha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The orsa jostle the hertha. The orsa jostle the pauletta. The orsa kiss the hertha. The orsa is diverse. The orsa wait the hertha. The orsa wait the pauletta. The hertha jostle the orsa. The hertha kiss the orsa. The hertha kiss the pauletta. The hertha is imitative. The pauletta jostle the orsa. The pauletta jostle the hertha. The pauletta kiss the orsa. The pauletta is diverse. The pauletta does not need the orsa. The pauletta wait the hertha. If someone is universal then they eat the orsa. If someone wait the orsa and the orsa does not need the hertha then the orsa is semantic. If the pauletta jostle the hertha then the pauletta is jamesian. If someone wait the pauletta then they are universal. If someone wait the pauletta and the pauletta is diverse then the pauletta does not need the orsa. If someone is imitative and they do not need the orsa then the orsa does not chase the hertha. The orsa is not universal.", "logic": "\nJostle(orsa, hertha)\nJostle(orsa, pauletta)\nKiss(orsa, hertha)\nDiverse(orsa)\nWait(orsa, hertha)\nWait(orsa, pauletta)\nJostle(hertha, orsa)\nKiss(hertha, orsa)\nKiss(hertha, pauletta)\nImitative(hertha)\nJostle(pauletta, orsa)\nJostle(pauletta, hertha)\nKiss(pauletta, orsa)\nDiverse(pauletta)\nnot Wait(pauletta, orsa)\nWait(pauletta, hertha)\nforall x (Universal(x) -> Kiss(x, orsa))\nforall x (Wait(x, orsa) and not Wait(orsa, hertha) -> Semantic(orsa))\nJostle(pauletta, hertha) -> Jamesian(pauletta)\nforall x (Wait(x, pauletta) -> Universal(x))\nforall x (Wait(x, pauletta) and Diverse(pauletta) -> not Wait(pauletta, orsa))\nforall x (Imitative(x) and not Wait(x, orsa) -> not Jostle(orsa, hertha))\n\nnot Universal(orsa)\n\nWait(orsa, pauletta) and forall x (Wait(x, pauletta) -> Universal(x)) -> therefore Universal(orsa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The hartwell outstrip the coriss. The hartwell outstrip the isabelle. The hartwell raven the coriss. The hartwell is addictive. The hartwell skid the coriss. The hartwell skid the isabelle. The coriss outstrip the hartwell. The coriss raven the hartwell. The coriss raven the isabelle. The coriss is hoggish. The isabelle outstrip the hartwell. The isabelle outstrip the coriss. The isabelle raven the hartwell. The isabelle is addictive. The isabelle does not need the hartwell. The isabelle skid the coriss. If someone is drifting then they eat the hartwell. If someone skid the hartwell and the hartwell does not need the coriss then the hartwell is nicaean. If the isabelle outstrip the coriss then the isabelle is droll. If someone skid the isabelle then they are drifting. If someone skid the isabelle and the isabelle is addictive then the isabelle does not need the hartwell. If someone is hoggish and they do not need the hartwell then the hartwell does not chase the coriss. The hartwell raven the hartwell.", "logic": "\nOutstrip(hartwell, coriss)\nOutstrip(hartwell, isabelle)\nRaven(hartwell, coriss)\nAddictive(hartwell)\nSkid(hartwell, coriss)\nSkid(hartwell, isabelle)\nOutstrip(coriss, hartwell)\nRaven(coriss, hartwell)\nRaven(coriss, isabelle)\nHoggish(coriss)\nOutstrip(isabelle, hartwell)\nOutstrip(isabelle, coriss)\nRaven(isabelle, hartwell)\nAddictive(isabelle)\nnot Skid(isabelle, hartwell)\nSkid(isabelle, coriss)\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> Raven(x, hartwell))\nforall x (Skid(x, hartwell) and not Skid(hartwell, coriss) -> Nicaean(hartwell))\nOutstrip(isabelle, coriss) -> Droll(isabelle)\nforall x (Skid(x, isabelle) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Skid(x, isabelle) and Addictive(isabelle) -> not Skid(isabelle, hartwell))\nforall x (Hoggish(x) and not Skid(x, hartwell) -> not Outstrip(hartwell, coriss))\n\nRaven(hartwell, hartwell)\n\nSkid(hartwell, isabelle) and forall x (Skid(x, isabelle) -> Drifting(x)) -> therefore Drifting(hartwell) Drifting(hartwell) and forall x (Drifting(x) -> Raven(x, hartwell)) -> therefore Raven(hartwell, hartwell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The august unstrap the clarie. The august unstrap the wilt. The august bargain the clarie. The august is deterrent. The august tussle the clarie. The august tussle the wilt. The clarie unstrap the august. The clarie bargain the august. The clarie bargain the wilt. The clarie is laboured. The wilt unstrap the august. The wilt unstrap the clarie. The wilt bargain the august. The wilt is deterrent. The wilt does not need the august. The wilt tussle the clarie. If someone is yelled then they eat the august. If someone tussle the august and the august does not need the clarie then the august is optic. If the wilt unstrap the clarie then the wilt is chatoyant. If someone tussle the wilt then they are yelled. If someone tussle the wilt and the wilt is deterrent then the wilt does not need the august. If someone is laboured and they do not need the august then the august does not chase the clarie. The august does not eat the august.", "logic": "\nUnstrap(august, clarie)\nUnstrap(august, wilt)\nBargain(august, clarie)\nDeterrent(august)\nTussle(august, clarie)\nTussle(august, wilt)\nUnstrap(clarie, august)\nBargain(clarie, august)\nBargain(clarie, wilt)\nLaboured(clarie)\nUnstrap(wilt, august)\nUnstrap(wilt, clarie)\nBargain(wilt, august)\nDeterrent(wilt)\nnot Tussle(wilt, august)\nTussle(wilt, clarie)\nforall x (Yelled(x) -> Bargain(x, august))\nforall x (Tussle(x, august) and not Tussle(august, clarie) -> Optic(august))\nUnstrap(wilt, clarie) -> Chatoyant(wilt)\nforall x (Tussle(x, wilt) -> Yelled(x))\nforall x (Tussle(x, wilt) and Deterrent(wilt) -> not Tussle(wilt, august))\nforall x (Laboured(x) and not Tussle(x, august) -> not Unstrap(august, clarie))\n\nnot Bargain(august, august)\n\nTussle(august, wilt) and forall x (Tussle(x, wilt) -> Yelled(x)) -> therefore Yelled(august) Yelled(august) and forall x (Yelled(x) -> Bargain(x, august)) -> therefore Bargain(august, august)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The marga lather the charyl. The marga lather the dominic. The marga devilize the charyl. The marga is fickle. The marga matte the charyl. The marga matte the dominic. The charyl lather the marga. The charyl devilize the marga. The charyl devilize the dominic. The charyl is formalized. The dominic lather the marga. The dominic lather the charyl. The dominic devilize the marga. The dominic is fickle. The dominic does not need the marga. The dominic matte the charyl. If someone is homocyclic then they eat the marga. If someone matte the marga and the marga does not need the charyl then the marga is wrong. If the dominic lather the charyl then the dominic is posed. If someone matte the dominic then they are homocyclic. If someone matte the dominic and the dominic is fickle then the dominic does not need the marga. If someone is formalized and they do not need the marga then the marga does not chase the charyl. The charyl is not homocyclic.", "logic": "\nLather(marga, charyl)\nLather(marga, dominic)\nDevilize(marga, charyl)\nFickle(marga)\nMatte(marga, charyl)\nMatte(marga, dominic)\nLather(charyl, marga)\nDevilize(charyl, marga)\nDevilize(charyl, dominic)\nFormalized(charyl)\nLather(dominic, marga)\nLather(dominic, charyl)\nDevilize(dominic, marga)\nFickle(dominic)\nnot Matte(dominic, marga)\nMatte(dominic, charyl)\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) -> Devilize(x, marga))\nforall x (Matte(x, marga) and not Matte(marga, charyl) -> Wrong(marga))\nLather(dominic, charyl) -> Posed(dominic)\nforall x (Matte(x, dominic) -> Homocyclic(x))\nforall x (Matte(x, dominic) and Fickle(dominic) -> not Matte(dominic, marga))\nforall x (Formalized(x) and not Matte(x, marga) -> not Lather(marga, charyl))\n\nnot Homocyclic(charyl)\n\nforall x (Matte(x, dominic) -> Homocyclic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The junia ante the roth. The junia ante the fionnula. The junia halve the roth. The junia is ninefold. The junia dramatise the roth. The junia dramatise the fionnula. The roth ante the junia. The roth halve the junia. The roth halve the fionnula. The roth is unbaffled. The fionnula ante the junia. The fionnula ante the roth. The fionnula halve the junia. The fionnula is ninefold. The fionnula does not need the junia. The fionnula dramatise the roth. If someone is veiled then they eat the junia. If someone dramatise the junia and the junia does not need the roth then the junia is unprepared. If the fionnula ante the roth then the fionnula is parvenu. If someone dramatise the fionnula then they are veiled. If someone dramatise the fionnula and the fionnula is ninefold then the fionnula does not need the junia. If someone is unbaffled and they do not need the junia then the junia does not chase the roth. The fionnula is veiled.", "logic": "\nAnte(junia, roth)\nAnte(junia, fionnula)\nHalve(junia, roth)\nNinefold(junia)\nDramatise(junia, roth)\nDramatise(junia, fionnula)\nAnte(roth, junia)\nHalve(roth, junia)\nHalve(roth, fionnula)\nUnbaffled(roth)\nAnte(fionnula, junia)\nAnte(fionnula, roth)\nHalve(fionnula, junia)\nNinefold(fionnula)\nnot Dramatise(fionnula, junia)\nDramatise(fionnula, roth)\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> Halve(x, junia))\nforall x (Dramatise(x, junia) and not Dramatise(junia, roth) -> Unprepared(junia))\nAnte(fionnula, roth) -> Parvenu(fionnula)\nforall x (Dramatise(x, fionnula) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Dramatise(x, fionnula) and Ninefold(fionnula) -> not Dramatise(fionnula, junia))\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) and not Dramatise(x, junia) -> not Ante(junia, roth))\n\nVeiled(fionnula)\n\nforall x (Dramatise(x, fionnula) -> Veiled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The urson pussyfoot the raimund. The urson pussyfoot the anatol. The urson accredit the raimund. The urson is lobated. The urson pool the raimund. The urson pool the anatol. The raimund pussyfoot the urson. The raimund accredit the urson. The raimund accredit the anatol. The raimund is warlike. The anatol pussyfoot the urson. The anatol pussyfoot the raimund. The anatol accredit the urson. The anatol is lobated. The anatol does not need the urson. The anatol pool the raimund. If someone is abactinal then they eat the urson. If someone pool the urson and the urson does not need the raimund then the urson is scanty. If the anatol pussyfoot the raimund then the anatol is epilithic. If someone pool the anatol then they are abactinal. If someone pool the anatol and the anatol is lobated then the anatol does not need the urson. If someone is warlike and they do not need the urson then the urson does not chase the raimund. The urson is not scanty.", "logic": "\nPussyfoot(urson, raimund)\nPussyfoot(urson, anatol)\nAccredit(urson, raimund)\nLobated(urson)\nPool(urson, raimund)\nPool(urson, anatol)\nPussyfoot(raimund, urson)\nAccredit(raimund, urson)\nAccredit(raimund, anatol)\nWarlike(raimund)\nPussyfoot(anatol, urson)\nPussyfoot(anatol, raimund)\nAccredit(anatol, urson)\nLobated(anatol)\nnot Pool(anatol, urson)\nPool(anatol, raimund)\nforall x (Abactinal(x) -> Accredit(x, urson))\nforall x (Pool(x, urson) and not Pool(urson, raimund) -> Scanty(urson))\nPussyfoot(anatol, raimund) -> Epilithic(anatol)\nforall x (Pool(x, anatol) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Pool(x, anatol) and Lobated(anatol) -> not Pool(anatol, urson))\nforall x (Warlike(x) and not Pool(x, urson) -> not Pussyfoot(urson, raimund))\n\nnot Scanty(urson)\n\nforall x (Pool(x, urson) and not Pool(urson, raimund) -> Scanty(urson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The melodie terrorize the kerri. The melodie terrorize the cherie. The melodie shame the kerri. The melodie is adulterate. The melodie overhear the kerri. The melodie overhear the cherie. The kerri terrorize the melodie. The kerri shame the melodie. The kerri shame the cherie. The kerri is glittery. The cherie terrorize the melodie. The cherie terrorize the kerri. The cherie shame the melodie. The cherie is adulterate. The cherie does not need the melodie. The cherie overhear the kerri. If someone is shaken then they eat the melodie. If someone overhear the melodie and the melodie does not need the kerri then the melodie is fumbling. If the cherie terrorize the kerri then the cherie is endogamous. If someone overhear the cherie then they are shaken. If someone overhear the cherie and the cherie is adulterate then the cherie does not need the melodie. If someone is glittery and they do not need the melodie then the melodie does not chase the kerri. The melodie overhear the melodie.", "logic": "\nTerrorize(melodie, kerri)\nTerrorize(melodie, cherie)\nShame(melodie, kerri)\nAdulterate(melodie)\nOverhear(melodie, kerri)\nOverhear(melodie, cherie)\nTerrorize(kerri, melodie)\nShame(kerri, melodie)\nShame(kerri, cherie)\nGlittery(kerri)\nTerrorize(cherie, melodie)\nTerrorize(cherie, kerri)\nShame(cherie, melodie)\nAdulterate(cherie)\nnot Overhear(cherie, melodie)\nOverhear(cherie, kerri)\nforall x (Shaken(x) -> Shame(x, melodie))\nforall x (Overhear(x, melodie) and not Overhear(melodie, kerri) -> Fumbling(melodie))\nTerrorize(cherie, kerri) -> Endogamous(cherie)\nforall x (Overhear(x, cherie) -> Shaken(x))\nforall x (Overhear(x, cherie) and Adulterate(cherie) -> not Overhear(cherie, melodie))\nforall x (Glittery(x) and not Overhear(x, melodie) -> not Terrorize(melodie, kerri))\n\nOverhear(melodie, melodie)\n\nOverhear(melodie, melodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The osbourne transship the mariana. The osbourne transship the johannah. The osbourne hype the mariana. The osbourne is handelian. The osbourne wing the mariana. The osbourne wing the johannah. The mariana transship the osbourne. The mariana hype the osbourne. The mariana hype the johannah. The mariana is passerine. The johannah transship the osbourne. The johannah transship the mariana. The johannah hype the osbourne. The johannah is handelian. The johannah does not need the osbourne. The johannah wing the mariana. If someone is thinned then they eat the osbourne. If someone wing the osbourne and the osbourne does not need the mariana then the osbourne is sapiens. If the johannah transship the mariana then the johannah is dewy. If someone wing the johannah then they are thinned. If someone wing the johannah and the johannah is handelian then the johannah does not need the osbourne. If someone is passerine and they do not need the osbourne then the osbourne does not chase the mariana. The osbourne does not eat the johannah.", "logic": "\nTransship(osbourne, mariana)\nTransship(osbourne, johannah)\nHype(osbourne, mariana)\nHandelian(osbourne)\nWing(osbourne, mariana)\nWing(osbourne, johannah)\nTransship(mariana, osbourne)\nHype(mariana, osbourne)\nHype(mariana, johannah)\nPasserine(mariana)\nTransship(johannah, osbourne)\nTransship(johannah, mariana)\nHype(johannah, osbourne)\nHandelian(johannah)\nnot Wing(johannah, osbourne)\nWing(johannah, mariana)\nforall x (Thinned(x) -> Hype(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Wing(x, osbourne) and not Wing(osbourne, mariana) -> Sapiens(osbourne))\nTransship(johannah, mariana) -> Dewy(johannah)\nforall x (Wing(x, johannah) -> Thinned(x))\nforall x (Wing(x, johannah) and Handelian(johannah) -> not Wing(johannah, osbourne))\nforall x (Passerine(x) and not Wing(x, osbourne) -> not Transship(osbourne, mariana))\n\nnot Hype(osbourne, johannah)\n\nnot Hype(osbourne, johannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The jacquette relace the gerhard. The jacquette relace the greta. The jacquette field the gerhard. The jacquette is unexceeded. The jacquette confute the gerhard. The jacquette confute the greta. The gerhard relace the jacquette. The gerhard field the jacquette. The gerhard field the greta. The gerhard is additional. The greta relace the jacquette. The greta relace the gerhard. The greta field the jacquette. The greta is unexceeded. The greta does not need the jacquette. The greta confute the gerhard. If someone is uncombable then they eat the jacquette. If someone confute the jacquette and the jacquette does not need the gerhard then the jacquette is stertorous. If the greta relace the gerhard then the greta is imbecile. If someone confute the greta then they are uncombable. If someone confute the greta and the greta is unexceeded then the greta does not need the jacquette. If someone is additional and they do not need the jacquette then the jacquette does not chase the gerhard. The gerhard relace the gerhard.", "logic": "\nRelace(jacquette, gerhard)\nRelace(jacquette, greta)\nField(jacquette, gerhard)\nUnexceeded(jacquette)\nConfute(jacquette, gerhard)\nConfute(jacquette, greta)\nRelace(gerhard, jacquette)\nField(gerhard, jacquette)\nField(gerhard, greta)\nAdditional(gerhard)\nRelace(greta, jacquette)\nRelace(greta, gerhard)\nField(greta, jacquette)\nUnexceeded(greta)\nnot Confute(greta, jacquette)\nConfute(greta, gerhard)\nforall x (Uncombable(x) -> Field(x, jacquette))\nforall x (Confute(x, jacquette) and not Confute(jacquette, gerhard) -> Stertorous(jacquette))\nRelace(greta, gerhard) -> Imbecile(greta)\nforall x (Confute(x, greta) -> Uncombable(x))\nforall x (Confute(x, greta) and Unexceeded(greta) -> not Confute(greta, jacquette))\nforall x (Additional(x) and not Confute(x, jacquette) -> not Relace(jacquette, gerhard))\n\nRelace(gerhard, gerhard)\n\nRelace(gerhard, gerhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The brynn is frustrated. The brynn fleet the iago. The brynn mismarry the milli. The brynn does not see the merrick. The milli mismarry the brynn. The milli does not see the iago. The iago fleet the merrick. The merrick fleet the brynn. The merrick fleet the milli. The merrick mismarry the brynn. If someone fleet the brynn and they are chinless then they do not see the milli. If someone is handy then they do not see the milli. If the iago hydrolize the brynn then the brynn hydrolize the merrick. If someone fleet the brynn then they are retained. If someone hydrolize the milli and the milli is not wanton then the milli mismarry the iago. If the milli fleet the brynn and the milli does not see the iago then the brynn mismarry the merrick. If the merrick does not need the brynn and the brynn does not see the merrick then the merrick is retained. If someone is retained then they do not need the merrick. The iago fleet the merrick.", "logic": "\nFrustrated(brynn)\nFleet(brynn, iago)\nMismarry(brynn, milli)\nnot Mismarry(brynn, merrick)\nMismarry(milli, brynn)\nnot Mismarry(milli, iago)\nFleet(iago, merrick)\nFleet(merrick, brynn)\nFleet(merrick, milli)\nMismarry(merrick, brynn)\nforall x (Fleet(x, brynn) and Chinless(x) -> not Mismarry(x, milli))\nforall x (Handy(x) -> not Mismarry(x, milli))\nHydrolize(iago, brynn) -> Hydrolize(brynn, merrick)\nforall x (Fleet(x, brynn) -> Retained(x))\nforall x (Hydrolize(x, milli) and not Wanton(milli) -> Mismarry(milli, iago))\nFleet(milli, brynn) and not Mismarry(milli, iago) -> Mismarry(brynn, merrick)\nnot Fleet(merrick, brynn) and not Mismarry(brynn, merrick) -> Retained(merrick)\nforall x (Retained(x) -> not Fleet(x, merrick))\n\nFleet(iago, merrick)\n\ntherefore Fleet(iago, merrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The kassie is prudish. The kassie bedraggle the lemmie. The kassie blare the doyle. The kassie does not see the minni. The doyle blare the kassie. The doyle does not see the lemmie. The lemmie bedraggle the minni. The minni bedraggle the kassie. The minni bedraggle the doyle. The minni blare the kassie. If someone bedraggle the kassie and they are reusable then they do not see the doyle. If someone is observable then they do not see the doyle. If the lemmie luge the kassie then the kassie luge the minni. If someone bedraggle the kassie then they are nightlong. If someone luge the doyle and the doyle is not oleophilic then the doyle blare the lemmie. If the doyle bedraggle the kassie and the doyle does not see the lemmie then the kassie blare the minni. If the minni does not need the kassie and the kassie does not see the minni then the minni is nightlong. If someone is nightlong then they do not need the minni. The doyle blare the lemmie.", "logic": "\nPrudish(kassie)\nBedraggle(kassie, lemmie)\nBlare(kassie, doyle)\nnot Blare(kassie, minni)\nBlare(doyle, kassie)\nnot Blare(doyle, lemmie)\nBedraggle(lemmie, minni)\nBedraggle(minni, kassie)\nBedraggle(minni, doyle)\nBlare(minni, kassie)\nforall x (Bedraggle(x, kassie) and Reusable(x) -> not Blare(x, doyle))\nforall x (Observable(x) -> not Blare(x, doyle))\nLuge(lemmie, kassie) -> Luge(kassie, minni)\nforall x (Bedraggle(x, kassie) -> Nightlong(x))\nforall x (Luge(x, doyle) and not Oleophilic(doyle) -> Blare(doyle, lemmie))\nBedraggle(doyle, kassie) and not Blare(doyle, lemmie) -> Blare(kassie, minni)\nnot Bedraggle(minni, kassie) and not Blare(kassie, minni) -> Nightlong(minni)\nforall x (Nightlong(x) -> not Bedraggle(x, minni))\n\nBlare(doyle, lemmie)\n\ntherefore not Blare(doyle, lemmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The jordanna is elapsed. The jordanna evacuate the coriss. The jordanna shriek the larry. The jordanna does not see the erek. The larry shriek the jordanna. The larry does not see the coriss. The coriss evacuate the erek. The erek evacuate the jordanna. The erek evacuate the larry. The erek shriek the jordanna. If someone evacuate the jordanna and they are unripe then they do not see the larry. If someone is blessed then they do not see the larry. If the coriss blight the jordanna then the jordanna blight the erek. If someone evacuate the jordanna then they are blustery. If someone blight the larry and the larry is not unspaced then the larry shriek the coriss. If the larry evacuate the jordanna and the larry does not see the coriss then the jordanna shriek the erek. If the erek does not need the jordanna and the jordanna does not see the erek then the erek is blustery. If someone is blustery then they do not need the erek. The erek is blustery.", "logic": "\nElapsed(jordanna)\nEvacuate(jordanna, coriss)\nShriek(jordanna, larry)\nnot Shriek(jordanna, erek)\nShriek(larry, jordanna)\nnot Shriek(larry, coriss)\nEvacuate(coriss, erek)\nEvacuate(erek, jordanna)\nEvacuate(erek, larry)\nShriek(erek, jordanna)\nforall x (Evacuate(x, jordanna) and Unripe(x) -> not Shriek(x, larry))\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> not Shriek(x, larry))\nBlight(coriss, jordanna) -> Blight(jordanna, erek)\nforall x (Evacuate(x, jordanna) -> Blustery(x))\nforall x (Blight(x, larry) and not Unspaced(larry) -> Shriek(larry, coriss))\nEvacuate(larry, jordanna) and not Shriek(larry, coriss) -> Shriek(jordanna, erek)\nnot Evacuate(erek, jordanna) and not Shriek(jordanna, erek) -> Blustery(erek)\nforall x (Blustery(x) -> not Evacuate(x, erek))\n\nBlustery(erek)\n\nEvacuate(erek, jordanna) and forall x (Evacuate(x, jordanna) -> Blustery(x)) -> therefore Blustery(erek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The velma is balky. The velma gird the storm. The velma hitch the douglass. The velma does not see the christan. The douglass hitch the velma. The douglass does not see the storm. The storm gird the christan. The christan gird the velma. The christan gird the douglass. The christan hitch the velma. If someone gird the velma and they are mediaeval then they do not see the douglass. If someone is facetious then they do not see the douglass. If the storm finger the velma then the velma finger the christan. If someone gird the velma then they are watered. If someone finger the douglass and the douglass is not delinquent then the douglass hitch the storm. If the douglass gird the velma and the douglass does not see the storm then the velma hitch the christan. If the christan does not need the velma and the velma does not see the christan then the christan is watered. If someone is watered then they do not need the christan. The christan is not watered.", "logic": "\nBalky(velma)\nGird(velma, storm)\nHitch(velma, douglass)\nnot Hitch(velma, christan)\nHitch(douglass, velma)\nnot Hitch(douglass, storm)\nGird(storm, christan)\nGird(christan, velma)\nGird(christan, douglass)\nHitch(christan, velma)\nforall x (Gird(x, velma) and Mediaeval(x) -> not Hitch(x, douglass))\nforall x (Facetious(x) -> not Hitch(x, douglass))\nFinger(storm, velma) -> Finger(velma, christan)\nforall x (Gird(x, velma) -> Watered(x))\nforall x (Finger(x, douglass) and not Delinquent(douglass) -> Hitch(douglass, storm))\nGird(douglass, velma) and not Hitch(douglass, storm) -> Hitch(velma, christan)\nnot Gird(christan, velma) and not Hitch(velma, christan) -> Watered(christan)\nforall x (Watered(x) -> not Gird(x, christan))\n\nnot Watered(christan)\n\nGird(christan, velma) and forall x (Gird(x, velma) -> Watered(x)) -> therefore Watered(christan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The shira is paradisal. The shira japan the rufus. The shira skydive the clarice. The shira does not see the danyette. The clarice skydive the shira. The clarice does not see the rufus. The rufus japan the danyette. The danyette japan the shira. The danyette japan the clarice. The danyette skydive the shira. If someone japan the shira and they are smoggy then they do not see the clarice. If someone is honest then they do not see the clarice. If the rufus decamp the shira then the shira decamp the danyette. If someone japan the shira then they are awned. If someone decamp the clarice and the clarice is not arresting then the clarice skydive the rufus. If the clarice japan the shira and the clarice does not see the rufus then the shira skydive the danyette. If the danyette does not need the shira and the shira does not see the danyette then the danyette is awned. If someone is awned then they do not need the danyette. The danyette does not need the danyette.", "logic": "\nParadisal(shira)\nJapan(shira, rufus)\nSkydive(shira, clarice)\nnot Skydive(shira, danyette)\nSkydive(clarice, shira)\nnot Skydive(clarice, rufus)\nJapan(rufus, danyette)\nJapan(danyette, shira)\nJapan(danyette, clarice)\nSkydive(danyette, shira)\nforall x (Japan(x, shira) and Smoggy(x) -> not Skydive(x, clarice))\nforall x (Honest(x) -> not Skydive(x, clarice))\nDecamp(rufus, shira) -> Decamp(shira, danyette)\nforall x (Japan(x, shira) -> Awned(x))\nforall x (Decamp(x, clarice) and not Arresting(clarice) -> Skydive(clarice, rufus))\nJapan(clarice, shira) and not Skydive(clarice, rufus) -> Skydive(shira, danyette)\nnot Japan(danyette, shira) and not Skydive(shira, danyette) -> Awned(danyette)\nforall x (Awned(x) -> not Japan(x, danyette))\n\nnot Japan(danyette, danyette)\n\nJapan(danyette, shira) and forall x (Japan(x, shira) -> Awned(x)) -> therefore Awned(danyette) Awned(danyette) and forall x (Awned(x) -> not Japan(x, danyette)) -> therefore not Japan(danyette, danyette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The lucienne is loathly. The lucienne publicise the reina. The lucienne brad the arvy. The lucienne does not see the raymond. The arvy brad the lucienne. The arvy does not see the reina. The reina publicise the raymond. The raymond publicise the lucienne. The raymond publicise the arvy. The raymond brad the lucienne. If someone publicise the lucienne and they are gestural then they do not see the arvy. If someone is adsorbate then they do not see the arvy. If the reina dehydrate the lucienne then the lucienne dehydrate the raymond. If someone publicise the lucienne then they are asyndetic. If someone dehydrate the arvy and the arvy is not earliest then the arvy brad the reina. If the arvy publicise the lucienne and the arvy does not see the reina then the lucienne brad the raymond. If the raymond does not need the lucienne and the lucienne does not see the raymond then the raymond is asyndetic. If someone is asyndetic then they do not need the raymond. The raymond publicise the raymond.", "logic": "\nLoathly(lucienne)\nPublicise(lucienne, reina)\nBrad(lucienne, arvy)\nnot Brad(lucienne, raymond)\nBrad(arvy, lucienne)\nnot Brad(arvy, reina)\nPublicise(reina, raymond)\nPublicise(raymond, lucienne)\nPublicise(raymond, arvy)\nBrad(raymond, lucienne)\nforall x (Publicise(x, lucienne) and Gestural(x) -> not Brad(x, arvy))\nforall x (Adsorbate(x) -> not Brad(x, arvy))\nDehydrate(reina, lucienne) -> Dehydrate(lucienne, raymond)\nforall x (Publicise(x, lucienne) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Dehydrate(x, arvy) and not Earliest(arvy) -> Brad(arvy, reina))\nPublicise(arvy, lucienne) and not Brad(arvy, reina) -> Brad(lucienne, raymond)\nnot Publicise(raymond, lucienne) and not Brad(lucienne, raymond) -> Asyndetic(raymond)\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> not Publicise(x, raymond))\n\nPublicise(raymond, raymond)\n\nPublicise(raymond, lucienne) and forall x (Publicise(x, lucienne) -> Asyndetic(x)) -> therefore Asyndetic(raymond) Asyndetic(raymond) and forall x (Asyndetic(x) -> not Publicise(x, raymond)) -> therefore not Publicise(raymond, raymond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The delinda is martian. The delinda crop the shelli. The delinda redesign the jodie. The delinda does not see the jean. The jodie redesign the delinda. The jodie does not see the shelli. The shelli crop the jean. The jean crop the delinda. The jean crop the jodie. The jean redesign the delinda. If someone crop the delinda and they are absorbing then they do not see the jodie. If someone is lissom then they do not see the jodie. If the shelli rape the delinda then the delinda rape the jean. If someone crop the delinda then they are unblushing. If someone rape the jodie and the jodie is not oppositive then the jodie redesign the shelli. If the jodie crop the delinda and the jodie does not see the shelli then the delinda redesign the jean. If the jean does not need the delinda and the delinda does not see the jean then the jean is unblushing. If someone is unblushing then they do not need the jean. The delinda does not visit the jean.", "logic": "\nMartian(delinda)\nCrop(delinda, shelli)\nRedesign(delinda, jodie)\nnot Redesign(delinda, jean)\nRedesign(jodie, delinda)\nnot Redesign(jodie, shelli)\nCrop(shelli, jean)\nCrop(jean, delinda)\nCrop(jean, jodie)\nRedesign(jean, delinda)\nforall x (Crop(x, delinda) and Absorbing(x) -> not Redesign(x, jodie))\nforall x (Lissom(x) -> not Redesign(x, jodie))\nRape(shelli, delinda) -> Rape(delinda, jean)\nforall x (Crop(x, delinda) -> Unblushing(x))\nforall x (Rape(x, jodie) and not Oppositive(jodie) -> Redesign(jodie, shelli))\nCrop(jodie, delinda) and not Redesign(jodie, shelli) -> Redesign(delinda, jean)\nnot Crop(jean, delinda) and not Redesign(delinda, jean) -> Unblushing(jean)\nforall x (Unblushing(x) -> not Crop(x, jean))\n\nnot Rape(delinda, jean)\n\nRape(shelli, delinda) -> Rape(delinda, jean) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The simone is expandable. The simone jiggle the coleen. The simone spellbind the diana. The simone does not see the socrates. The diana spellbind the simone. The diana does not see the coleen. The coleen jiggle the socrates. The socrates jiggle the simone. The socrates jiggle the diana. The socrates spellbind the simone. If someone jiggle the simone and they are outlined then they do not see the diana. If someone is basophilic then they do not see the diana. If the coleen forbid the simone then the simone forbid the socrates. If someone jiggle the simone then they are womanlike. If someone forbid the diana and the diana is not birch then the diana spellbind the coleen. If the diana jiggle the simone and the diana does not see the coleen then the simone spellbind the socrates. If the socrates does not need the simone and the simone does not see the socrates then the socrates is womanlike. If someone is womanlike then they do not need the socrates. The coleen is womanlike.", "logic": "\nExpandable(simone)\nJiggle(simone, coleen)\nSpellbind(simone, diana)\nnot Spellbind(simone, socrates)\nSpellbind(diana, simone)\nnot Spellbind(diana, coleen)\nJiggle(coleen, socrates)\nJiggle(socrates, simone)\nJiggle(socrates, diana)\nSpellbind(socrates, simone)\nforall x (Jiggle(x, simone) and Outlined(x) -> not Spellbind(x, diana))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) -> not Spellbind(x, diana))\nForbid(coleen, simone) -> Forbid(simone, socrates)\nforall x (Jiggle(x, simone) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Forbid(x, diana) and not Birch(diana) -> Spellbind(diana, coleen))\nJiggle(diana, simone) and not Spellbind(diana, coleen) -> Spellbind(simone, socrates)\nnot Jiggle(socrates, simone) and not Spellbind(simone, socrates) -> Womanlike(socrates)\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> not Jiggle(x, socrates))\n\nWomanlike(coleen)\n\nforall x (Jiggle(x, simone) -> Womanlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The andie is bleak. The andie excavate the charita. The andie loose the arlyn. The andie does not see the dorian. The arlyn loose the andie. The arlyn does not see the charita. The charita excavate the dorian. The dorian excavate the andie. The dorian excavate the arlyn. The dorian loose the andie. If someone excavate the andie and they are catatonic then they do not see the arlyn. If someone is homonymous then they do not see the arlyn. If the charita archaize the andie then the andie archaize the dorian. If someone excavate the andie then they are diffused. If someone archaize the arlyn and the arlyn is not emulous then the arlyn loose the charita. If the arlyn excavate the andie and the arlyn does not see the charita then the andie loose the dorian. If the dorian does not need the andie and the andie does not see the dorian then the dorian is diffused. If someone is diffused then they do not need the dorian. The arlyn is not diffused.", "logic": "\nBleak(andie)\nExcavate(andie, charita)\nLoose(andie, arlyn)\nnot Loose(andie, dorian)\nLoose(arlyn, andie)\nnot Loose(arlyn, charita)\nExcavate(charita, dorian)\nExcavate(dorian, andie)\nExcavate(dorian, arlyn)\nLoose(dorian, andie)\nforall x (Excavate(x, andie) and Catatonic(x) -> not Loose(x, arlyn))\nforall x (Homonymous(x) -> not Loose(x, arlyn))\nArchaize(charita, andie) -> Archaize(andie, dorian)\nforall x (Excavate(x, andie) -> Diffused(x))\nforall x (Archaize(x, arlyn) and not Emulous(arlyn) -> Loose(arlyn, charita))\nExcavate(arlyn, andie) and not Loose(arlyn, charita) -> Loose(andie, dorian)\nnot Excavate(dorian, andie) and not Loose(andie, dorian) -> Diffused(dorian)\nforall x (Diffused(x) -> not Excavate(x, dorian))\n\nnot Diffused(arlyn)\n\nforall x (Excavate(x, andie) -> Diffused(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The marianne is animating. The marianne advect the myna. The marianne cancel the canada. The marianne does not see the corina. The canada cancel the marianne. The canada does not see the myna. The myna advect the corina. The corina advect the marianne. The corina advect the canada. The corina cancel the marianne. If someone advect the marianne and they are rampant then they do not see the canada. If someone is undigested then they do not see the canada. If the myna melodize the marianne then the marianne melodize the corina. If someone advect the marianne then they are phantasmal. If someone melodize the canada and the canada is not dyslectic then the canada cancel the myna. If the canada advect the marianne and the canada does not see the myna then the marianne cancel the corina. If the corina does not need the marianne and the marianne does not see the corina then the corina is phantasmal. If someone is phantasmal then they do not need the corina. The canada cancel the corina.", "logic": "\nAnimating(marianne)\nAdvect(marianne, myna)\nCancel(marianne, canada)\nnot Cancel(marianne, corina)\nCancel(canada, marianne)\nnot Cancel(canada, myna)\nAdvect(myna, corina)\nAdvect(corina, marianne)\nAdvect(corina, canada)\nCancel(corina, marianne)\nforall x (Advect(x, marianne) and Rampant(x) -> not Cancel(x, canada))\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> not Cancel(x, canada))\nMelodize(myna, marianne) -> Melodize(marianne, corina)\nforall x (Advect(x, marianne) -> Phantasmal(x))\nforall x (Melodize(x, canada) and not Dyslectic(canada) -> Cancel(canada, myna))\nAdvect(canada, marianne) and not Cancel(canada, myna) -> Cancel(marianne, corina)\nnot Advect(corina, marianne) and not Cancel(marianne, corina) -> Phantasmal(corina)\nforall x (Phantasmal(x) -> not Advect(x, corina))\n\nCancel(canada, corina)\n\nCancel(canada, corina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The emmett is oxidative. The emmett vamp the lorilee. The emmett distribute the angie. The emmett does not see the xena. The angie distribute the emmett. The angie does not see the lorilee. The lorilee vamp the xena. The xena vamp the emmett. The xena vamp the angie. The xena distribute the emmett. If someone vamp the emmett and they are sabine then they do not see the angie. If someone is advertised then they do not see the angie. If the lorilee natter the emmett then the emmett natter the xena. If someone vamp the emmett then they are insolvable. If someone natter the angie and the angie is not reptilian then the angie distribute the lorilee. If the angie vamp the emmett and the angie does not see the lorilee then the emmett distribute the xena. If the xena does not need the emmett and the emmett does not see the xena then the xena is insolvable. If someone is insolvable then they do not need the xena. The emmett does not need the angie.", "logic": "\nOxidative(emmett)\nVamp(emmett, lorilee)\nDistribute(emmett, angie)\nnot Distribute(emmett, xena)\nDistribute(angie, emmett)\nnot Distribute(angie, lorilee)\nVamp(lorilee, xena)\nVamp(xena, emmett)\nVamp(xena, angie)\nDistribute(xena, emmett)\nforall x (Vamp(x, emmett) and Sabine(x) -> not Distribute(x, angie))\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> not Distribute(x, angie))\nNatter(lorilee, emmett) -> Natter(emmett, xena)\nforall x (Vamp(x, emmett) -> Insolvable(x))\nforall x (Natter(x, angie) and not Reptilian(angie) -> Distribute(angie, lorilee))\nVamp(angie, emmett) and not Distribute(angie, lorilee) -> Distribute(emmett, xena)\nnot Vamp(xena, emmett) and not Distribute(emmett, xena) -> Insolvable(xena)\nforall x (Insolvable(x) -> not Vamp(x, xena))\n\nnot Vamp(emmett, angie)\n\nnot Vamp(emmett, angie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "The cathlene is sculptured. The cathlene collar the karylin. The cathlene faint the jonny. The cathlene does not see the glory. The jonny faint the cathlene. The jonny does not see the karylin. The karylin collar the glory. The glory collar the cathlene. The glory collar the jonny. The glory faint the cathlene. If someone collar the cathlene and they are fortemente then they do not see the jonny. If someone is unedited then they do not see the jonny. If the karylin profiteer the cathlene then the cathlene profiteer the glory. If someone collar the cathlene then they are stray. If someone profiteer the jonny and the jonny is not pimply then the jonny faint the karylin. If the jonny collar the cathlene and the jonny does not see the karylin then the cathlene faint the glory. If the glory does not need the cathlene and the cathlene does not see the glory then the glory is stray. If someone is stray then they do not need the glory. The glory is fortemente.", "logic": "\nSculptured(cathlene)\nCollar(cathlene, karylin)\nFaint(cathlene, jonny)\nnot Faint(cathlene, glory)\nFaint(jonny, cathlene)\nnot Faint(jonny, karylin)\nCollar(karylin, glory)\nCollar(glory, cathlene)\nCollar(glory, jonny)\nFaint(glory, cathlene)\nforall x (Collar(x, cathlene) and Fortemente(x) -> not Faint(x, jonny))\nforall x (Unedited(x) -> not Faint(x, jonny))\nProfiteer(karylin, cathlene) -> Profiteer(cathlene, glory)\nforall x (Collar(x, cathlene) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, jonny) and not Pimply(jonny) -> Faint(jonny, karylin))\nCollar(jonny, cathlene) and not Faint(jonny, karylin) -> Faint(cathlene, glory)\nnot Collar(glory, cathlene) and not Faint(cathlene, glory) -> Stray(glory)\nforall x (Stray(x) -> not Collar(x, glory))\n\nFortemente(glory)\n\nFortemente(glory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Sephira is slashed. Norm is uncrossed. Allsun is slashed. Miles is cinematic. If something is litigious and cinematic then it is polygenic. If Norm is litigious then Norm is analogue. All polygenic things are cocky. All litigious things are slashed. If something is uncrossed and analogue then it is litigious. Furry things are litigious. Kind, litigious things are analogue. If Miles is analogue and Miles is litigious then Miles is polygenic. Miles is cinematic.", "logic": "\nSlashed(sephira)\nUncrossed(norm)\nSlashed(allsun)\nCinematic(miles)\nforall x (Litigious(x) and Cinematic(x) -> Polygenic(x))\nLitigious(norm) -> Analogue(norm)\nforall x (Polygenic(x) -> Cocky(x))\nforall x (Litigious(x) -> Slashed(x))\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) and Analogue(x) -> Litigious(x))\nforall x (Cinematic(x) -> Litigious(x))\nforall x (Cocky(x) and Litigious(x) -> Analogue(x))\nAnalogue(miles) and Litigious(miles) -> Polygenic(miles)\n\nCinematic(miles)\n\ntherefore Cinematic(miles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Dom is nacreous. Brigida is paying. Dee is nacreous. Ursula is compulsory. If something is georgian and compulsory then it is feminine. If Brigida is georgian then Brigida is morbific. All feminine things are bobtail. All georgian things are nacreous. If something is paying and morbific then it is georgian. Furry things are georgian. Kind, georgian things are morbific. If Ursula is morbific and Ursula is georgian then Ursula is feminine. Dom is not nacreous.", "logic": "\nNacreous(dom)\nPaying(brigida)\nNacreous(dee)\nCompulsory(ursula)\nforall x (Georgian(x) and Compulsory(x) -> Feminine(x))\nGeorgian(brigida) -> Morbific(brigida)\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Bobtail(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Nacreous(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) and Morbific(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Bobtail(x) and Georgian(x) -> Morbific(x))\nMorbific(ursula) and Georgian(ursula) -> Feminine(ursula)\n\nnot Nacreous(dom)\n\ntherefore Nacreous(dom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Marris is slaveless. Rodina is supported. Juliane is slaveless. Eleonora is apish. If something is sympatric and apish then it is sphingine. If Rodina is sympatric then Rodina is disjointed. All sphingine things are sottish. All sympatric things are slaveless. If something is supported and disjointed then it is sympatric. Furry things are sympatric. Kind, sympatric things are disjointed. If Eleonora is disjointed and Eleonora is sympatric then Eleonora is sphingine. Eleonora is sympatric.", "logic": "\nSlaveless(marris)\nSupported(rodina)\nSlaveless(juliane)\nApish(eleonora)\nforall x (Sympatric(x) and Apish(x) -> Sphingine(x))\nSympatric(rodina) -> Disjointed(rodina)\nforall x (Sphingine(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Sympatric(x) -> Slaveless(x))\nforall x (Supported(x) and Disjointed(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Sottish(x) and Sympatric(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nDisjointed(eleonora) and Sympatric(eleonora) -> Sphingine(eleonora)\n\nSympatric(eleonora)\n\nApish(eleonora) and forall x (Apish(x) -> Sympatric(x)) -> therefore Sympatric(eleonora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Halette is forthright. Hasty is nubbly. Maddi is forthright. Kermie is busty. If something is upscale and busty then it is historied. If Hasty is upscale then Hasty is coriaceous. All historied things are clayey. All upscale things are forthright. If something is nubbly and coriaceous then it is upscale. Furry things are upscale. Kind, upscale things are coriaceous. If Kermie is coriaceous and Kermie is upscale then Kermie is historied. Kermie is not upscale.", "logic": "\nForthright(halette)\nNubbly(hasty)\nForthright(maddi)\nBusty(kermie)\nforall x (Upscale(x) and Busty(x) -> Historied(x))\nUpscale(hasty) -> Coriaceous(hasty)\nforall x (Historied(x) -> Clayey(x))\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Forthright(x))\nforall x (Nubbly(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Upscale(x))\nforall x (Busty(x) -> Upscale(x))\nforall x (Clayey(x) and Upscale(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nCoriaceous(kermie) and Upscale(kermie) -> Historied(kermie)\n\nnot Upscale(kermie)\n\nBusty(kermie) and forall x (Busty(x) -> Upscale(x)) -> therefore Upscale(kermie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Maribeth is ibsenian. Daffi is beautiful. Del is ibsenian. Lizette is demanding. If something is left and demanding then it is seamanlike. If Daffi is left then Daffi is undraped. All seamanlike things are subalpine. All left things are ibsenian. If something is beautiful and undraped then it is left. Furry things are left. Kind, left things are undraped. If Lizette is undraped and Lizette is left then Lizette is seamanlike. Lizette is seamanlike.", "logic": "\nIbsenian(maribeth)\nBeautiful(daffi)\nIbsenian(del)\nDemanding(lizette)\nforall x (Left(x) and Demanding(x) -> Seamanlike(x))\nLeft(daffi) -> Undraped(daffi)\nforall x (Seamanlike(x) -> Subalpine(x))\nforall x (Left(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and Undraped(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Subalpine(x) and Left(x) -> Undraped(x))\nUndraped(lizette) and Left(lizette) -> Seamanlike(lizette)\n\nSeamanlike(lizette)\n\nDemanding(lizette) and forall x (Demanding(x) -> Left(x)) -> therefore Left(lizette) Left(lizette) and Demanding(lizette) and forall x (Left(x) and Demanding(x) -> Seamanlike(x)) -> therefore Seamanlike(lizette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Elvin is uncropped. Uriah is edematous. Almeria is uncropped. Mabelle is inductive. If something is unpolluted and inductive then it is intruding. If Uriah is unpolluted then Uriah is tensional. All intruding things are unsavory. All unpolluted things are uncropped. If something is edematous and tensional then it is unpolluted. Furry things are unpolluted. Kind, unpolluted things are tensional. If Mabelle is tensional and Mabelle is unpolluted then Mabelle is intruding. Mabelle is not uncropped.", "logic": "\nUncropped(elvin)\nEdematous(uriah)\nUncropped(almeria)\nInductive(mabelle)\nforall x (Unpolluted(x) and Inductive(x) -> Intruding(x))\nUnpolluted(uriah) -> Tensional(uriah)\nforall x (Intruding(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Unpolluted(x) -> Uncropped(x))\nforall x (Edematous(x) and Tensional(x) -> Unpolluted(x))\nforall x (Inductive(x) -> Unpolluted(x))\nforall x (Unsavory(x) and Unpolluted(x) -> Tensional(x))\nTensional(mabelle) and Unpolluted(mabelle) -> Intruding(mabelle)\n\nnot Uncropped(mabelle)\n\nInductive(mabelle) and forall x (Inductive(x) -> Unpolluted(x)) -> therefore Unpolluted(mabelle) Unpolluted(mabelle) and forall x (Unpolluted(x) -> Uncropped(x)) -> therefore Uncropped(mabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Wilfred is messianic. Mohan is thinking. Bishop is messianic. Bell is bistered. If something is useless and bistered then it is biserrate. If Mohan is useless then Mohan is columnlike. All biserrate things are unbranded. All useless things are messianic. If something is thinking and columnlike then it is useless. Furry things are useless. Kind, useless things are columnlike. If Bell is columnlike and Bell is useless then Bell is biserrate. Mohan is not columnlike.", "logic": "\nMessianic(wilfred)\nThinking(mohan)\nMessianic(bishop)\nBistered(bell)\nforall x (Useless(x) and Bistered(x) -> Biserrate(x))\nUseless(mohan) -> Columnlike(mohan)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> Unbranded(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Messianic(x))\nforall x (Thinking(x) and Columnlike(x) -> Useless(x))\nforall x (Bistered(x) -> Useless(x))\nforall x (Unbranded(x) and Useless(x) -> Columnlike(x))\nColumnlike(bell) and Useless(bell) -> Biserrate(bell)\n\nnot Columnlike(mohan)\n\nUseless(mohan) -> Columnlike(mohan) <- forall x (Thinking(x) and Columnlike(x) -> Useless(x)) <- forall x (Unbranded(x) and Useless(x) -> Columnlike(x)) <- forall x (Bistered(x) -> Useless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Jillane is forced. Candida is derogative. Kalindi is forced. Eugen is seeable. If something is royal and seeable then it is foamy. If Candida is royal then Candida is plumate. All foamy things are parthian. All royal things are forced. If something is derogative and plumate then it is royal. Furry things are royal. Kind, royal things are plumate. If Eugen is plumate and Eugen is royal then Eugen is foamy. Kalindi is foamy.", "logic": "\nForced(jillane)\nDerogative(candida)\nForced(kalindi)\nSeeable(eugen)\nforall x (Royal(x) and Seeable(x) -> Foamy(x))\nRoyal(candida) -> Plumate(candida)\nforall x (Foamy(x) -> Parthian(x))\nforall x (Royal(x) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Derogative(x) and Plumate(x) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Parthian(x) and Royal(x) -> Plumate(x))\nPlumate(eugen) and Royal(eugen) -> Foamy(eugen)\n\nFoamy(kalindi)\n\nforall x (Royal(x) and Seeable(x) -> Foamy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Elana is caesarean. Angela is disordered. Waverly is caesarean. Joycelin is warning. If something is scrabbly and warning then it is apocryphal. If Angela is scrabbly then Angela is diluvial. All apocryphal things are blessed. All scrabbly things are caesarean. If something is disordered and diluvial then it is scrabbly. Furry things are scrabbly. Kind, scrabbly things are diluvial. If Joycelin is diluvial and Joycelin is scrabbly then Joycelin is apocryphal. Elana is not apocryphal.", "logic": "\nCaesarean(elana)\nDisordered(angela)\nCaesarean(waverly)\nWarning(joycelin)\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) and Warning(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\nScrabbly(angela) -> Diluvial(angela)\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Blessed(x))\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) -> Caesarean(x))\nforall x (Disordered(x) and Diluvial(x) -> Scrabbly(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Scrabbly(x))\nforall x (Blessed(x) and Scrabbly(x) -> Diluvial(x))\nDiluvial(joycelin) and Scrabbly(joycelin) -> Apocryphal(joycelin)\n\nnot Apocryphal(elana)\n\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) and Warning(x) -> Apocryphal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Lisa is dextrorsal. Barry is sliced. Latisha is dextrorsal. Flossie is gauzy. If something is tinkly and gauzy then it is awry. If Barry is tinkly then Barry is smoldering. All awry things are waning. All tinkly things are dextrorsal. If something is sliced and smoldering then it is tinkly. Furry things are tinkly. Kind, tinkly things are smoldering. If Flossie is smoldering and Flossie is tinkly then Flossie is awry. Latisha is gauzy.", "logic": "\nDextrorsal(lisa)\nSliced(barry)\nDextrorsal(latisha)\nGauzy(flossie)\nforall x (Tinkly(x) and Gauzy(x) -> Awry(x))\nTinkly(barry) -> Smoldering(barry)\nforall x (Awry(x) -> Waning(x))\nforall x (Tinkly(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\nforall x (Sliced(x) and Smoldering(x) -> Tinkly(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Tinkly(x))\nforall x (Waning(x) and Tinkly(x) -> Smoldering(x))\nSmoldering(flossie) and Tinkly(flossie) -> Awry(flossie)\n\nGauzy(latisha)\n\nGauzy(latisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Yardley is snub. Len is lecherous. Ann is snub. Marthena is tractable. If something is asquint and tractable then it is penial. If Len is asquint then Len is irascible. All penial things are tiered. All asquint things are snub. If something is lecherous and irascible then it is asquint. Furry things are asquint. Kind, asquint things are irascible. If Marthena is irascible and Marthena is asquint then Marthena is penial. Yardley is not lecherous.", "logic": "\nSnub(yardley)\nLecherous(len)\nSnub(ann)\nTractable(marthena)\nforall x (Asquint(x) and Tractable(x) -> Penial(x))\nAsquint(len) -> Irascible(len)\nforall x (Penial(x) -> Tiered(x))\nforall x (Asquint(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Lecherous(x) and Irascible(x) -> Asquint(x))\nforall x (Tractable(x) -> Asquint(x))\nforall x (Tiered(x) and Asquint(x) -> Irascible(x))\nIrascible(marthena) and Asquint(marthena) -> Penial(marthena)\n\nnot Lecherous(yardley)\n\nnot Lecherous(yardley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Kimmy is chuffed. Cosmo is moldovan. Jeni is chuffed. Shelagh is blinding. If something is dire and blinding then it is neuter. If Cosmo is dire then Cosmo is symbolic. All neuter things are vulpine. All dire things are chuffed. If something is moldovan and symbolic then it is dire. Furry things are dire. Kind, dire things are symbolic. If Shelagh is symbolic and Shelagh is dire then Shelagh is neuter. Kimmy is blinding.", "logic": "\nChuffed(kimmy)\nMoldovan(cosmo)\nChuffed(jeni)\nBlinding(shelagh)\nforall x (Dire(x) and Blinding(x) -> Neuter(x))\nDire(cosmo) -> Symbolic(cosmo)\nforall x (Neuter(x) -> Vulpine(x))\nforall x (Dire(x) -> Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Moldovan(x) and Symbolic(x) -> Dire(x))\nforall x (Blinding(x) -> Dire(x))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) and Dire(x) -> Symbolic(x))\nSymbolic(shelagh) and Dire(shelagh) -> Neuter(shelagh)\n\nBlinding(kimmy)\n\nBlinding(kimmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The rozalin does not need the angelica. The angelica retrograde the susanna. The susanna want the rozalin. If something retrograde the rozalin and it does not need the angelica then the angelica retrograde the rozalin. If something retrograde the rozalin then it is not polydactyl. If something retrograde the susanna then the susanna retrograde the rozalin. The susanna want the rozalin.", "logic": "\nnot Want(rozalin, angelica)\nRetrograde(angelica, susanna)\nWant(susanna, rozalin)\nforall x (Retrograde(x, rozalin) and not Want(x, angelica) -> Retrograde(angelica, rozalin))\nforall x (Retrograde(x, rozalin) -> not Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x, susanna) -> Retrograde(susanna, rozalin))\n\nWant(susanna, rozalin)\n\ntherefore Want(susanna, rozalin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The dustin does not need the izabel. The izabel plume the jefferey. The jefferey bother the dustin. If something plume the dustin and it does not need the izabel then the izabel plume the dustin. If something plume the dustin then it is not dread. If something plume the jefferey then the jefferey plume the dustin. The izabel does not like the jefferey.", "logic": "\nnot Bother(dustin, izabel)\nPlume(izabel, jefferey)\nBother(jefferey, dustin)\nforall x (Plume(x, dustin) and not Bother(x, izabel) -> Plume(izabel, dustin))\nforall x (Plume(x, dustin) -> not Dread(x))\nforall x (Plume(x, jefferey) -> Plume(jefferey, dustin))\n\nnot Plume(izabel, jefferey)\n\ntherefore Plume(izabel, jefferey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The shandee does not need the tailor. The tailor apply the fayth. The fayth bowdlerize the shandee. If something apply the shandee and it does not need the tailor then the tailor apply the shandee. If something apply the shandee then it is not enatic. If something apply the fayth then the fayth apply the shandee. The fayth apply the shandee.", "logic": "\nnot Bowdlerize(shandee, tailor)\nApply(tailor, fayth)\nBowdlerize(fayth, shandee)\nforall x (Apply(x, shandee) and not Bowdlerize(x, tailor) -> Apply(tailor, shandee))\nforall x (Apply(x, shandee) -> not Enatic(x))\nforall x (Apply(x, fayth) -> Apply(fayth, shandee))\n\nApply(fayth, shandee)\n\nApply(tailor, fayth) and forall x (Apply(x, fayth) -> Apply(fayth, shandee)) -> therefore Apply(fayth, shandee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The patrik does not need the oswell. The oswell parcel the bentley. The bentley roneo the patrik. If something parcel the patrik and it does not need the oswell then the oswell parcel the patrik. If something parcel the patrik then it is not eolotropic. If something parcel the bentley then the bentley parcel the patrik. The bentley does not like the patrik.", "logic": "\nnot Roneo(patrik, oswell)\nParcel(oswell, bentley)\nRoneo(bentley, patrik)\nforall x (Parcel(x, patrik) and not Roneo(x, oswell) -> Parcel(oswell, patrik))\nforall x (Parcel(x, patrik) -> not Eolotropic(x))\nforall x (Parcel(x, bentley) -> Parcel(bentley, patrik))\n\nnot Parcel(bentley, patrik)\n\nParcel(oswell, bentley) and forall x (Parcel(x, bentley) -> Parcel(bentley, patrik)) -> therefore Parcel(bentley, patrik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The stacee does not need the skye. The skye round the kin. The kin declare the stacee. If something round the stacee and it does not need the skye then the skye round the stacee. If something round the stacee then it is not noncausal. If something round the kin then the kin round the stacee. The kin is not noncausal.", "logic": "\nnot Declare(stacee, skye)\nRound(skye, kin)\nDeclare(kin, stacee)\nforall x (Round(x, stacee) and not Declare(x, skye) -> Round(skye, stacee))\nforall x (Round(x, stacee) -> not Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Round(x, kin) -> Round(kin, stacee))\n\nnot Noncausal(kin)\n\nRound(skye, kin) and forall x (Round(x, kin) -> Round(kin, stacee)) -> therefore Round(kin, stacee) Round(kin, stacee) and forall x (Round(x, stacee) -> not Noncausal(x)) -> therefore not Noncausal(kin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The ophelie does not need the jacinthe. The jacinthe time the lanny. The lanny commune the ophelie. If something time the ophelie and it does not need the jacinthe then the jacinthe time the ophelie. If something time the ophelie then it is not goddamned. If something time the lanny then the lanny time the ophelie. The lanny is goddamned.", "logic": "\nnot Commune(ophelie, jacinthe)\nTime(jacinthe, lanny)\nCommune(lanny, ophelie)\nforall x (Time(x, ophelie) and not Commune(x, jacinthe) -> Time(jacinthe, ophelie))\nforall x (Time(x, ophelie) -> not Goddamned(x))\nforall x (Time(x, lanny) -> Time(lanny, ophelie))\n\nGoddamned(lanny)\n\nTime(jacinthe, lanny) and forall x (Time(x, lanny) -> Time(lanny, ophelie)) -> therefore Time(lanny, ophelie) Time(lanny, ophelie) and forall x (Time(x, ophelie) -> not Goddamned(x)) -> therefore not Goddamned(lanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The vinnie does not need the daphne. The daphne readjust the marigold. The marigold romance the vinnie. If something readjust the vinnie and it does not need the daphne then the daphne readjust the vinnie. If something readjust the vinnie then it is not discursive. If something readjust the marigold then the marigold readjust the vinnie. The daphne does not like the vinnie.", "logic": "\nnot Romance(vinnie, daphne)\nReadjust(daphne, marigold)\nRomance(marigold, vinnie)\nforall x (Readjust(x, vinnie) and not Romance(x, daphne) -> Readjust(daphne, vinnie))\nforall x (Readjust(x, vinnie) -> not Discursive(x))\nforall x (Readjust(x, marigold) -> Readjust(marigold, vinnie))\n\nnot Readjust(daphne, vinnie)\n\nforall x (Readjust(x, vinnie) and not Romance(x, daphne) -> Readjust(daphne, vinnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The dita does not need the trevor. The trevor elegize the anni. The anni abstain the dita. If something elegize the dita and it does not need the trevor then the trevor elegize the dita. If something elegize the dita then it is not acropetal. If something elegize the anni then the anni elegize the dita. The dita abstain the dita.", "logic": "\nnot Abstain(dita, trevor)\nElegize(trevor, anni)\nAbstain(anni, dita)\nforall x (Elegize(x, dita) and not Abstain(x, trevor) -> Elegize(trevor, dita))\nforall x (Elegize(x, dita) -> not Acropetal(x))\nforall x (Elegize(x, anni) -> Elegize(anni, dita))\n\nAbstain(dita, dita)\n\nAbstain(dita, dita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The wynnie does not need the bayard. The bayard exhaust the desmond. The desmond lampoon the wynnie. If something exhaust the wynnie and it does not need the bayard then the bayard exhaust the wynnie. If something exhaust the wynnie then it is not side. If something exhaust the desmond then the desmond exhaust the wynnie. The bayard does not need the bayard.", "logic": "\nnot Lampoon(wynnie, bayard)\nExhaust(bayard, desmond)\nLampoon(desmond, wynnie)\nforall x (Exhaust(x, wynnie) and not Lampoon(x, bayard) -> Exhaust(bayard, wynnie))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, wynnie) -> not Side(x))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, desmond) -> Exhaust(desmond, wynnie))\n\nnot Lampoon(bayard, bayard)\n\nnot Lampoon(bayard, bayard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The shira does not need the kylen. The kylen vesiculate the bethanne. The bethanne rabbet the shira. If something vesiculate the shira and it does not need the kylen then the kylen vesiculate the shira. If something vesiculate the shira then it is not inundated. If something vesiculate the bethanne then the bethanne vesiculate the shira. The kylen chases the shira.", "logic": "\nnot Rabbet(shira, kylen)\nVesiculate(kylen, bethanne)\nRabbet(bethanne, shira)\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, shira) and not Rabbet(x, kylen) -> Vesiculate(kylen, shira))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, shira) -> not Inundated(x))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, bethanne) -> Vesiculate(bethanne, shira))\n\nChases(kylen, shira)\n\nChases(kylen, shira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The margery does not need the chelsae. The chelsae screak the keeley. The keeley benefit the margery. If something screak the margery and it does not need the chelsae then the chelsae screak the margery. If something screak the margery then it is not canonized. If something screak the keeley then the keeley screak the margery. The margery does not like the keeley.", "logic": "\nnot Benefit(margery, chelsae)\nScreak(chelsae, keeley)\nBenefit(keeley, margery)\nforall x (Screak(x, margery) and not Benefit(x, chelsae) -> Screak(chelsae, margery))\nforall x (Screak(x, margery) -> not Canonized(x))\nforall x (Screak(x, keeley) -> Screak(keeley, margery))\n\nnot Screak(margery, keeley)\n\nnot Screak(margery, keeley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The olenka does not need the nissa. The nissa undervalue the luana. The luana spangle the olenka. If something undervalue the olenka and it does not need the nissa then the nissa undervalue the olenka. If something undervalue the olenka then it is not pragmatic. If something undervalue the luana then the luana undervalue the olenka. The luana chases the nissa.", "logic": "\nnot Spangle(olenka, nissa)\nUndervalue(nissa, luana)\nSpangle(luana, olenka)\nforall x (Undervalue(x, olenka) and not Spangle(x, nissa) -> Undervalue(nissa, olenka))\nforall x (Undervalue(x, olenka) -> not Pragmatic(x))\nforall x (Undervalue(x, luana) -> Undervalue(luana, olenka))\n\nChases(luana, nissa)\n\nChases(luana, nissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Karol is converted. Karol is bestial. Karol is ticklish. Karol is unfaceted. Karol is dandified. Karol is atheist. Karol is standard. Gertrudis is converted. Gertrudis is ticklish. Gertrudis is unfaceted. Gertrudis is dandified. Gertrudis is atheist. Gertrudis is standard. Anson is bestial. Anson is unfaceted. Anson is dandified. If Gertrudis is bestial and Gertrudis is standard then Gertrudis is atheist. If something is converted and standard then it is unfaceted. If something is bestial and standard then it is dandified. Smart, unfaceted things are ticklish. All bestial, dandified things are standard. Quiet, bestial things are unfaceted. Gertrudis is ticklish.", "logic": "\nConverted(karol)\nBestial(karol)\nTicklish(karol)\nUnfaceted(karol)\nDandified(karol)\nAtheist(karol)\nStandard(karol)\nConverted(gertrudis)\nTicklish(gertrudis)\nUnfaceted(gertrudis)\nDandified(gertrudis)\nAtheist(gertrudis)\nStandard(gertrudis)\nBestial(anson)\nUnfaceted(anson)\nDandified(anson)\nBestial(gertrudis) and Standard(gertrudis) -> Atheist(gertrudis)\nforall x (Converted(x) and Standard(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) and Standard(x) -> Dandified(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) and Unfaceted(x) -> Ticklish(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) and Dandified(x) -> Standard(x))\nforall x (Dandified(x) and Bestial(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\n\nTicklish(gertrudis)\n\ntherefore Ticklish(gertrudis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Warren is annoyed. Warren is acquitted. Warren is ironical. Warren is drudging. Warren is intestinal. Warren is baboonish. Warren is allylic. Lelia is annoyed. Lelia is ironical. Lelia is drudging. Lelia is intestinal. Lelia is baboonish. Lelia is allylic. Novelia is acquitted. Novelia is drudging. Novelia is intestinal. If Lelia is acquitted and Lelia is allylic then Lelia is baboonish. If something is annoyed and allylic then it is drudging. If something is acquitted and allylic then it is intestinal. Smart, drudging things are ironical. All acquitted, intestinal things are allylic. Quiet, acquitted things are drudging. Warren is not allylic.", "logic": "\nAnnoyed(warren)\nAcquitted(warren)\nIronical(warren)\nDrudging(warren)\nIntestinal(warren)\nBaboonish(warren)\nAllylic(warren)\nAnnoyed(lelia)\nIronical(lelia)\nDrudging(lelia)\nIntestinal(lelia)\nBaboonish(lelia)\nAllylic(lelia)\nAcquitted(novelia)\nDrudging(novelia)\nIntestinal(novelia)\nAcquitted(lelia) and Allylic(lelia) -> Baboonish(lelia)\nforall x (Annoyed(x) and Allylic(x) -> Drudging(x))\nforall x (Acquitted(x) and Allylic(x) -> Intestinal(x))\nforall x (Allylic(x) and Drudging(x) -> Ironical(x))\nforall x (Acquitted(x) and Intestinal(x) -> Allylic(x))\nforall x (Intestinal(x) and Acquitted(x) -> Drudging(x))\n\nnot Allylic(warren)\n\ntherefore Allylic(warren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Quent is undismayed. Quent is pureblood. Quent is cognitive. Quent is short. Quent is hedged. Quent is eroded. Quent is scrupulous. Consolata is undismayed. Consolata is cognitive. Consolata is short. Consolata is hedged. Consolata is eroded. Consolata is scrupulous. Holly is pureblood. Holly is short. Holly is hedged. If Consolata is pureblood and Consolata is scrupulous then Consolata is eroded. If something is undismayed and scrupulous then it is short. If something is pureblood and scrupulous then it is hedged. Smart, short things are cognitive. All pureblood, hedged things are scrupulous. Quiet, pureblood things are short. Holly is scrupulous.", "logic": "\nUndismayed(quent)\nPureblood(quent)\nCognitive(quent)\nShort(quent)\nHedged(quent)\nEroded(quent)\nScrupulous(quent)\nUndismayed(consolata)\nCognitive(consolata)\nShort(consolata)\nHedged(consolata)\nEroded(consolata)\nScrupulous(consolata)\nPureblood(holly)\nShort(holly)\nHedged(holly)\nPureblood(consolata) and Scrupulous(consolata) -> Eroded(consolata)\nforall x (Undismayed(x) and Scrupulous(x) -> Short(x))\nforall x (Pureblood(x) and Scrupulous(x) -> Hedged(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Short(x) -> Cognitive(x))\nforall x (Pureblood(x) and Hedged(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Pureblood(x) -> Short(x))\n\nScrupulous(holly)\n\nPureblood(holly) and Hedged(holly) and forall x (Pureblood(x) and Hedged(x) -> Scrupulous(x)) -> therefore Scrupulous(holly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Katlin is omnivorous. Katlin is weird. Katlin is rarefied. Katlin is winey. Katlin is redeemed. Katlin is nonsexual. Katlin is organized. Hyman is omnivorous. Hyman is rarefied. Hyman is winey. Hyman is redeemed. Hyman is nonsexual. Hyman is organized. Isahella is weird. Isahella is winey. Isahella is redeemed. If Hyman is weird and Hyman is organized then Hyman is nonsexual. If something is omnivorous and organized then it is winey. If something is weird and organized then it is redeemed. Smart, winey things are rarefied. All weird, redeemed things are organized. Quiet, weird things are winey. Isahella is not organized.", "logic": "\nOmnivorous(katlin)\nWeird(katlin)\nRarefied(katlin)\nWiney(katlin)\nRedeemed(katlin)\nNonsexual(katlin)\nOrganized(katlin)\nOmnivorous(hyman)\nRarefied(hyman)\nWiney(hyman)\nRedeemed(hyman)\nNonsexual(hyman)\nOrganized(hyman)\nWeird(isahella)\nWiney(isahella)\nRedeemed(isahella)\nWeird(hyman) and Organized(hyman) -> Nonsexual(hyman)\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) and Organized(x) -> Winey(x))\nforall x (Weird(x) and Organized(x) -> Redeemed(x))\nforall x (Organized(x) and Winey(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Weird(x) and Redeemed(x) -> Organized(x))\nforall x (Redeemed(x) and Weird(x) -> Winey(x))\n\nnot Organized(isahella)\n\nWeird(isahella) and Redeemed(isahella) and forall x (Weird(x) and Redeemed(x) -> Organized(x)) -> therefore Organized(isahella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Geeta is watery. Geeta is spangly. Geeta is knightly. Geeta is dirigible. Geeta is venal. Geeta is ohmic. Geeta is woollen. Abagail is watery. Abagail is knightly. Abagail is dirigible. Abagail is venal. Abagail is ohmic. Abagail is woollen. Alford is spangly. Alford is dirigible. Alford is venal. If Abagail is spangly and Abagail is woollen then Abagail is ohmic. If something is watery and woollen then it is dirigible. If something is spangly and woollen then it is venal. Smart, dirigible things are knightly. All spangly, venal things are woollen. Quiet, spangly things are dirigible. Alford is knightly.", "logic": "\nWatery(geeta)\nSpangly(geeta)\nKnightly(geeta)\nDirigible(geeta)\nVenal(geeta)\nOhmic(geeta)\nWoollen(geeta)\nWatery(abagail)\nKnightly(abagail)\nDirigible(abagail)\nVenal(abagail)\nOhmic(abagail)\nWoollen(abagail)\nSpangly(alford)\nDirigible(alford)\nVenal(alford)\nSpangly(abagail) and Woollen(abagail) -> Ohmic(abagail)\nforall x (Watery(x) and Woollen(x) -> Dirigible(x))\nforall x (Spangly(x) and Woollen(x) -> Venal(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) and Dirigible(x) -> Knightly(x))\nforall x (Spangly(x) and Venal(x) -> Woollen(x))\nforall x (Venal(x) and Spangly(x) -> Dirigible(x))\n\nKnightly(alford)\n\nSpangly(alford) and Venal(alford) and forall x (Spangly(x) and Venal(x) -> Woollen(x)) -> therefore Woollen(alford) Woollen(alford) and Dirigible(alford) and forall x (Woollen(x) and Dirigible(x) -> Knightly(x)) -> therefore Knightly(alford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Didi is lumpish. Didi is older. Didi is bleak. Didi is baseless. Didi is suicidal. Didi is overhasty. Didi is svelte. Milka is lumpish. Milka is bleak. Milka is baseless. Milka is suicidal. Milka is overhasty. Milka is svelte. Russ is older. Russ is baseless. Russ is suicidal. If Milka is older and Milka is svelte then Milka is overhasty. If something is lumpish and svelte then it is baseless. If something is older and svelte then it is suicidal. Smart, baseless things are bleak. All older, suicidal things are svelte. Quiet, older things are baseless. Russ is not bleak.", "logic": "\nLumpish(didi)\nOlder(didi)\nBleak(didi)\nBaseless(didi)\nSuicidal(didi)\nOverhasty(didi)\nSvelte(didi)\nLumpish(milka)\nBleak(milka)\nBaseless(milka)\nSuicidal(milka)\nOverhasty(milka)\nSvelte(milka)\nOlder(russ)\nBaseless(russ)\nSuicidal(russ)\nOlder(milka) and Svelte(milka) -> Overhasty(milka)\nforall x (Lumpish(x) and Svelte(x) -> Baseless(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and Svelte(x) -> Suicidal(x))\nforall x (Svelte(x) and Baseless(x) -> Bleak(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and Suicidal(x) -> Svelte(x))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) and Older(x) -> Baseless(x))\n\nnot Bleak(russ)\n\nOlder(russ) and Suicidal(russ) and forall x (Older(x) and Suicidal(x) -> Svelte(x)) -> therefore Svelte(russ) Svelte(russ) and Baseless(russ) and forall x (Svelte(x) and Baseless(x) -> Bleak(x)) -> therefore Bleak(russ)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Marrissa is accursed. Marrissa is reconciled. Marrissa is huge. Marrissa is xxxii. Marrissa is monthly. Marrissa is raging. Marrissa is ploughed. Paulette is accursed. Paulette is huge. Paulette is xxxii. Paulette is monthly. Paulette is raging. Paulette is ploughed. Leila is reconciled. Leila is xxxii. Leila is monthly. If Paulette is reconciled and Paulette is ploughed then Paulette is raging. If something is accursed and ploughed then it is xxxii. If something is reconciled and ploughed then it is monthly. Smart, xxxii things are huge. All reconciled, monthly things are ploughed. Quiet, reconciled things are xxxii. Leila is not accursed.", "logic": "\nAccursed(marrissa)\nReconciled(marrissa)\nHuge(marrissa)\nXxxii(marrissa)\nMonthly(marrissa)\nRaging(marrissa)\nPloughed(marrissa)\nAccursed(paulette)\nHuge(paulette)\nXxxii(paulette)\nMonthly(paulette)\nRaging(paulette)\nPloughed(paulette)\nReconciled(leila)\nXxxii(leila)\nMonthly(leila)\nReconciled(paulette) and Ploughed(paulette) -> Raging(paulette)\nforall x (Accursed(x) and Ploughed(x) -> Xxxii(x))\nforall x (Reconciled(x) and Ploughed(x) -> Monthly(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) and Xxxii(x) -> Huge(x))\nforall x (Reconciled(x) and Monthly(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) and Reconciled(x) -> Xxxii(x))\n\nnot Accursed(leila)\n\nnot Accursed(leila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Jenica is beatific. Jenica is coptic. Jenica is syntactic. Jenica is tasseled. Jenica is wizard. Jenica is downstairs. Jenica is colonised. Pansy is beatific. Pansy is syntactic. Pansy is tasseled. Pansy is wizard. Pansy is downstairs. Pansy is colonised. Tomi is coptic. Tomi is tasseled. Tomi is wizard. If Pansy is coptic and Pansy is colonised then Pansy is downstairs. If something is beatific and colonised then it is tasseled. If something is coptic and colonised then it is wizard. Smart, tasseled things are syntactic. All coptic, wizard things are colonised. Quiet, coptic things are tasseled. Pansy is coptic.", "logic": "\nBeatific(jenica)\nCoptic(jenica)\nSyntactic(jenica)\nTasseled(jenica)\nWizard(jenica)\nDownstairs(jenica)\nColonised(jenica)\nBeatific(pansy)\nSyntactic(pansy)\nTasseled(pansy)\nWizard(pansy)\nDownstairs(pansy)\nColonised(pansy)\nCoptic(tomi)\nTasseled(tomi)\nWizard(tomi)\nCoptic(pansy) and Colonised(pansy) -> Downstairs(pansy)\nforall x (Beatific(x) and Colonised(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Coptic(x) and Colonised(x) -> Wizard(x))\nforall x (Colonised(x) and Tasseled(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Coptic(x) and Wizard(x) -> Colonised(x))\nforall x (Wizard(x) and Coptic(x) -> Tasseled(x))\n\nCoptic(pansy)\n\nCoptic(pansy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-36"} {"premises": "Illa is alimentary. Illa is narial. Illa is overproud. Illa is becoming. Jonathan is alimentary. Jonathan is narial. Shaina is amyloidal. Shaina is not alimentary. Shaina is not narial. Shaina is ungathered. Shaina is not overproud. Tom is amyloidal. Tom is not alimentary. Tom is narial. Tom is not ungathered. If Tom is not becoming then Tom is not narial. If Illa is not becoming then Illa is cataclinal. If someone is cataclinal and alimentary then they are amyloidal. If someone is narial and overproud then they are cataclinal. If someone is ungathered and becoming then they are not cataclinal. If Jonathan is alimentary then Jonathan is amyloidal. Shaina is ungathered.", "logic": "\nAlimentary(illa)\nNarial(illa)\nOverproud(illa)\nBecoming(illa)\nAlimentary(jonathan)\nNarial(jonathan)\nAmyloidal(shaina)\nnot Alimentary(shaina)\nnot Narial(shaina)\nUngathered(shaina)\nnot Overproud(shaina)\nAmyloidal(tom)\nnot Alimentary(tom)\nNarial(tom)\nnot Ungathered(tom)\nnot Becoming(tom) -> not Narial(tom)\nnot Becoming(illa) -> Cataclinal(illa)\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) and Alimentary(x) -> Amyloidal(x))\nforall x (Narial(x) and Overproud(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) and Becoming(x) -> not Cataclinal(x))\nAlimentary(jonathan) -> Amyloidal(jonathan)\n\nUngathered(shaina)\n\ntherefore Ungathered(shaina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Sinclare is combed. Sinclare is undrawn. Sinclare is sopranino. Sinclare is fallacious. Nevil is combed. Nevil is undrawn. Wilhelm is morganatic. Wilhelm is not combed. Wilhelm is not undrawn. Wilhelm is noisy. Wilhelm is not sopranino. Gisele is morganatic. Gisele is not combed. Gisele is undrawn. Gisele is not noisy. If Gisele is not fallacious then Gisele is not undrawn. If Sinclare is not fallacious then Sinclare is judicable. If someone is judicable and combed then they are morganatic. If someone is undrawn and sopranino then they are judicable. If someone is noisy and fallacious then they are not judicable. If Nevil is combed then Nevil is morganatic. Gisele is not undrawn.", "logic": "\nCombed(sinclare)\nUndrawn(sinclare)\nSopranino(sinclare)\nFallacious(sinclare)\nCombed(nevil)\nUndrawn(nevil)\nMorganatic(wilhelm)\nnot Combed(wilhelm)\nnot Undrawn(wilhelm)\nNoisy(wilhelm)\nnot Sopranino(wilhelm)\nMorganatic(gisele)\nnot Combed(gisele)\nUndrawn(gisele)\nnot Noisy(gisele)\nnot Fallacious(gisele) -> not Undrawn(gisele)\nnot Fallacious(sinclare) -> Judicable(sinclare)\nforall x (Judicable(x) and Combed(x) -> Morganatic(x))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Sopranino(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Noisy(x) and Fallacious(x) -> not Judicable(x))\nCombed(nevil) -> Morganatic(nevil)\n\nnot Undrawn(gisele)\n\ntherefore Undrawn(gisele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Lucas is antennary. Lucas is lithic. Lucas is guided. Lucas is fictitious. Cinnamon is antennary. Cinnamon is lithic. Blakelee is foldaway. Blakelee is not antennary. Blakelee is not lithic. Blakelee is sheathed. Blakelee is not guided. Becky is foldaway. Becky is not antennary. Becky is lithic. Becky is not sheathed. If Becky is not fictitious then Becky is not lithic. If Lucas is not fictitious then Lucas is rectified. If someone is rectified and antennary then they are foldaway. If someone is lithic and guided then they are rectified. If someone is sheathed and fictitious then they are not rectified. If Cinnamon is antennary then Cinnamon is foldaway. Lucas is rectified.", "logic": "\nAntennary(lucas)\nLithic(lucas)\nGuided(lucas)\nFictitious(lucas)\nAntennary(cinnamon)\nLithic(cinnamon)\nFoldaway(blakelee)\nnot Antennary(blakelee)\nnot Lithic(blakelee)\nSheathed(blakelee)\nnot Guided(blakelee)\nFoldaway(becky)\nnot Antennary(becky)\nLithic(becky)\nnot Sheathed(becky)\nnot Fictitious(becky) -> not Lithic(becky)\nnot Fictitious(lucas) -> Rectified(lucas)\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Antennary(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Lithic(x) and Guided(x) -> Rectified(x))\nforall x (Sheathed(x) and Fictitious(x) -> not Rectified(x))\nAntennary(cinnamon) -> Foldaway(cinnamon)\n\nRectified(lucas)\n\nLithic(lucas) and Guided(lucas) and forall x (Lithic(x) and Guided(x) -> Rectified(x)) -> therefore Rectified(lucas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Dollie is animist. Dollie is sericeous. Dollie is cracking. Dollie is hasidic. Tadeas is animist. Tadeas is sericeous. Forester is undomestic. Forester is not animist. Forester is not sericeous. Forester is assessable. Forester is not cracking. Mateo is undomestic. Mateo is not animist. Mateo is sericeous. Mateo is not assessable. If Mateo is not hasidic then Mateo is not sericeous. If Dollie is not hasidic then Dollie is unlivable. If someone is unlivable and animist then they are undomestic. If someone is sericeous and cracking then they are unlivable. If someone is assessable and hasidic then they are not unlivable. If Tadeas is animist then Tadeas is undomestic. Tadeas is not undomestic.", "logic": "\nAnimist(dollie)\nSericeous(dollie)\nCracking(dollie)\nHasidic(dollie)\nAnimist(tadeas)\nSericeous(tadeas)\nUndomestic(forester)\nnot Animist(forester)\nnot Sericeous(forester)\nAssessable(forester)\nnot Cracking(forester)\nUndomestic(mateo)\nnot Animist(mateo)\nSericeous(mateo)\nnot Assessable(mateo)\nnot Hasidic(mateo) -> not Sericeous(mateo)\nnot Hasidic(dollie) -> Unlivable(dollie)\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Animist(x) -> Undomestic(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Cracking(x) -> Unlivable(x))\nforall x (Assessable(x) and Hasidic(x) -> not Unlivable(x))\nAnimist(tadeas) -> Undomestic(tadeas)\n\nnot Undomestic(tadeas)\n\nAnimist(tadeas) and Animist(tadeas) -> Undomestic(tadeas) -> therefore Undomestic(tadeas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Suzzy is ravaged. Suzzy is hydroxy. Suzzy is theban. Suzzy is adenoid. Carter is ravaged. Carter is hydroxy. Dotti is unknown. Dotti is not ravaged. Dotti is not hydroxy. Dotti is hourly. Dotti is not theban. Auberta is unknown. Auberta is not ravaged. Auberta is hydroxy. Auberta is not hourly. If Auberta is not adenoid then Auberta is not hydroxy. If Suzzy is not adenoid then Suzzy is neoplastic. If someone is neoplastic and ravaged then they are unknown. If someone is hydroxy and theban then they are neoplastic. If someone is hourly and adenoid then they are not neoplastic. If Carter is ravaged then Carter is unknown. Suzzy is unknown.", "logic": "\nRavaged(suzzy)\nHydroxy(suzzy)\nTheban(suzzy)\nAdenoid(suzzy)\nRavaged(carter)\nHydroxy(carter)\nUnknown(dotti)\nnot Ravaged(dotti)\nnot Hydroxy(dotti)\nHourly(dotti)\nnot Theban(dotti)\nUnknown(auberta)\nnot Ravaged(auberta)\nHydroxy(auberta)\nnot Hourly(auberta)\nnot Adenoid(auberta) -> not Hydroxy(auberta)\nnot Adenoid(suzzy) -> Neoplastic(suzzy)\nforall x (Neoplastic(x) and Ravaged(x) -> Unknown(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) and Theban(x) -> Neoplastic(x))\nforall x (Hourly(x) and Adenoid(x) -> not Neoplastic(x))\nRavaged(carter) -> Unknown(carter)\n\nUnknown(suzzy)\n\nHydroxy(suzzy) and Theban(suzzy) and forall x (Hydroxy(x) and Theban(x) -> Neoplastic(x)) -> therefore Neoplastic(suzzy) Neoplastic(suzzy) and Ravaged(suzzy) and forall x (Neoplastic(x) and Ravaged(x) -> Unknown(x)) -> therefore Unknown(suzzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Merilee is polygenic. Merilee is deciding. Merilee is evocative. Merilee is methodist. Chantal is polygenic. Chantal is deciding. Tito is consensual. Tito is not polygenic. Tito is not deciding. Tito is curvaceous. Tito is not evocative. Hynda is consensual. Hynda is not polygenic. Hynda is deciding. Hynda is not curvaceous. If Hynda is not methodist then Hynda is not deciding. If Merilee is not methodist then Merilee is unmannerly. If someone is unmannerly and polygenic then they are consensual. If someone is deciding and evocative then they are unmannerly. If someone is curvaceous and methodist then they are not unmannerly. If Chantal is polygenic then Chantal is consensual. Merilee is not consensual.", "logic": "\nPolygenic(merilee)\nDeciding(merilee)\nEvocative(merilee)\nMethodist(merilee)\nPolygenic(chantal)\nDeciding(chantal)\nConsensual(tito)\nnot Polygenic(tito)\nnot Deciding(tito)\nCurvaceous(tito)\nnot Evocative(tito)\nConsensual(hynda)\nnot Polygenic(hynda)\nDeciding(hynda)\nnot Curvaceous(hynda)\nnot Methodist(hynda) -> not Deciding(hynda)\nnot Methodist(merilee) -> Unmannerly(merilee)\nforall x (Unmannerly(x) and Polygenic(x) -> Consensual(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Evocative(x) -> Unmannerly(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) and Methodist(x) -> not Unmannerly(x))\nPolygenic(chantal) -> Consensual(chantal)\n\nnot Consensual(merilee)\n\nDeciding(merilee) and Evocative(merilee) and forall x (Deciding(x) and Evocative(x) -> Unmannerly(x)) -> therefore Unmannerly(merilee) Unmannerly(merilee) and Polygenic(merilee) and forall x (Unmannerly(x) and Polygenic(x) -> Consensual(x)) -> therefore Consensual(merilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Nancee is cycloidal. Nancee is extreme. Nancee is addlepated. Nancee is plural. Darci is cycloidal. Darci is extreme. Ileane is amendatory. Ileane is not cycloidal. Ileane is not extreme. Ileane is scrofulous. Ileane is not addlepated. Constanta is amendatory. Constanta is not cycloidal. Constanta is extreme. Constanta is not scrofulous. If Constanta is not plural then Constanta is not extreme. If Nancee is not plural then Nancee is specified. If someone is specified and cycloidal then they are amendatory. If someone is extreme and addlepated then they are specified. If someone is scrofulous and plural then they are not specified. If Darci is cycloidal then Darci is amendatory. Constanta is not specified.", "logic": "\nCycloidal(nancee)\nExtreme(nancee)\nAddlepated(nancee)\nPlural(nancee)\nCycloidal(darci)\nExtreme(darci)\nAmendatory(ileane)\nnot Cycloidal(ileane)\nnot Extreme(ileane)\nScrofulous(ileane)\nnot Addlepated(ileane)\nAmendatory(constanta)\nnot Cycloidal(constanta)\nExtreme(constanta)\nnot Scrofulous(constanta)\nnot Plural(constanta) -> not Extreme(constanta)\nnot Plural(nancee) -> Specified(nancee)\nforall x (Specified(x) and Cycloidal(x) -> Amendatory(x))\nforall x (Extreme(x) and Addlepated(x) -> Specified(x))\nforall x (Scrofulous(x) and Plural(x) -> not Specified(x))\nCycloidal(darci) -> Amendatory(darci)\n\nnot Specified(constanta)\n\nforall x (Extreme(x) and Addlepated(x) -> Specified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Esau is hermitical. Esau is cognisant. Esau is benthonic. Esau is incessant. Holly is hermitical. Holly is cognisant. Normie is numb. Normie is not hermitical. Normie is not cognisant. Normie is unseeable. Normie is not benthonic. Chicky is numb. Chicky is not hermitical. Chicky is cognisant. Chicky is not unseeable. If Chicky is not incessant then Chicky is not cognisant. If Esau is not incessant then Esau is thankless. If someone is thankless and hermitical then they are numb. If someone is cognisant and benthonic then they are thankless. If someone is unseeable and incessant then they are not thankless. If Holly is hermitical then Holly is numb. Holly is thankless.", "logic": "\nHermitical(esau)\nCognisant(esau)\nBenthonic(esau)\nIncessant(esau)\nHermitical(holly)\nCognisant(holly)\nNumb(normie)\nnot Hermitical(normie)\nnot Cognisant(normie)\nUnseeable(normie)\nnot Benthonic(normie)\nNumb(chicky)\nnot Hermitical(chicky)\nCognisant(chicky)\nnot Unseeable(chicky)\nnot Incessant(chicky) -> not Cognisant(chicky)\nnot Incessant(esau) -> Thankless(esau)\nforall x (Thankless(x) and Hermitical(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and Benthonic(x) -> Thankless(x))\nforall x (Unseeable(x) and Incessant(x) -> not Thankless(x))\nHermitical(holly) -> Numb(holly)\n\nThankless(holly)\n\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and Benthonic(x) -> Thankless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Muire is succulent. Muire is shintoist. Muire is sensitised. Muire is dendritic. Linzy is succulent. Linzy is shintoist. Dmitri is shoed. Dmitri is not succulent. Dmitri is not shintoist. Dmitri is manorial. Dmitri is not sensitised. Agamemnon is shoed. Agamemnon is not succulent. Agamemnon is shintoist. Agamemnon is not manorial. If Agamemnon is not dendritic then Agamemnon is not shintoist. If Muire is not dendritic then Muire is prying. If someone is prying and succulent then they are shoed. If someone is shintoist and sensitised then they are prying. If someone is manorial and dendritic then they are not prying. If Linzy is succulent then Linzy is shoed. Dmitri is not prying.", "logic": "\nSucculent(muire)\nShintoist(muire)\nSensitised(muire)\nDendritic(muire)\nSucculent(linzy)\nShintoist(linzy)\nShoed(dmitri)\nnot Succulent(dmitri)\nnot Shintoist(dmitri)\nManorial(dmitri)\nnot Sensitised(dmitri)\nShoed(agamemnon)\nnot Succulent(agamemnon)\nShintoist(agamemnon)\nnot Manorial(agamemnon)\nnot Dendritic(agamemnon) -> not Shintoist(agamemnon)\nnot Dendritic(muire) -> Prying(muire)\nforall x (Prying(x) and Succulent(x) -> Shoed(x))\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and Sensitised(x) -> Prying(x))\nforall x (Manorial(x) and Dendritic(x) -> not Prying(x))\nSucculent(linzy) -> Shoed(linzy)\n\nnot Prying(dmitri)\n\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and Sensitised(x) -> Prying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Barney is amerind. Barney is utter. Barney is pernicious. Barney is brimming. Corie is amerind. Corie is utter. Lorette is japanese. Lorette is not amerind. Lorette is not utter. Lorette is fungal. Lorette is not pernicious. Loise is japanese. Loise is not amerind. Loise is utter. Loise is not fungal. If Loise is not brimming then Loise is not utter. If Barney is not brimming then Barney is merged. If someone is merged and amerind then they are japanese. If someone is utter and pernicious then they are merged. If someone is fungal and brimming then they are not merged. If Corie is amerind then Corie is japanese. Barney is fungal.", "logic": "\nAmerind(barney)\nUtter(barney)\nPernicious(barney)\nBrimming(barney)\nAmerind(corie)\nUtter(corie)\nJapanese(lorette)\nnot Amerind(lorette)\nnot Utter(lorette)\nFungal(lorette)\nnot Pernicious(lorette)\nJapanese(loise)\nnot Amerind(loise)\nUtter(loise)\nnot Fungal(loise)\nnot Brimming(loise) -> not Utter(loise)\nnot Brimming(barney) -> Merged(barney)\nforall x (Merged(x) and Amerind(x) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) and Pernicious(x) -> Merged(x))\nforall x (Fungal(x) and Brimming(x) -> not Merged(x))\nAmerind(corie) -> Japanese(corie)\n\nFungal(barney)\n\nFungal(barney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Lazare is overeager. Lazare is dextrorse. Lazare is inexpert. Lazare is gawky. Beverlie is overeager. Beverlie is dextrorse. Katee is besprent. Katee is not overeager. Katee is not dextrorse. Katee is pyrolytic. Katee is not inexpert. Scotti is besprent. Scotti is not overeager. Scotti is dextrorse. Scotti is not pyrolytic. If Scotti is not gawky then Scotti is not dextrorse. If Lazare is not gawky then Lazare is exsanguine. If someone is exsanguine and overeager then they are besprent. If someone is dextrorse and inexpert then they are exsanguine. If someone is pyrolytic and gawky then they are not exsanguine. If Beverlie is overeager then Beverlie is besprent. Beverlie is not gawky.", "logic": "\nOvereager(lazare)\nDextrorse(lazare)\nInexpert(lazare)\nGawky(lazare)\nOvereager(beverlie)\nDextrorse(beverlie)\nBesprent(katee)\nnot Overeager(katee)\nnot Dextrorse(katee)\nPyrolytic(katee)\nnot Inexpert(katee)\nBesprent(scotti)\nnot Overeager(scotti)\nDextrorse(scotti)\nnot Pyrolytic(scotti)\nnot Gawky(scotti) -> not Dextrorse(scotti)\nnot Gawky(lazare) -> Exsanguine(lazare)\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Overeager(x) -> Besprent(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and Inexpert(x) -> Exsanguine(x))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) and Gawky(x) -> not Exsanguine(x))\nOvereager(beverlie) -> Besprent(beverlie)\n\nnot Gawky(beverlie)\n\nnot Gawky(beverlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "Ulberto is cisalpine. Ulberto is bogus. Ulberto is agnate. Ulberto is regulated. Auberta is cisalpine. Auberta is bogus. Armand is unearthly. Armand is not cisalpine. Armand is not bogus. Armand is ruminative. Armand is not agnate. Loren is unearthly. Loren is not cisalpine. Loren is bogus. Loren is not ruminative. If Loren is not regulated then Loren is not bogus. If Ulberto is not regulated then Ulberto is avuncular. If someone is avuncular and cisalpine then they are unearthly. If someone is bogus and agnate then they are avuncular. If someone is ruminative and regulated then they are not avuncular. If Auberta is cisalpine then Auberta is unearthly. Loren is regulated.", "logic": "\nCisalpine(ulberto)\nBogus(ulberto)\nAgnate(ulberto)\nRegulated(ulberto)\nCisalpine(auberta)\nBogus(auberta)\nUnearthly(armand)\nnot Cisalpine(armand)\nnot Bogus(armand)\nRuminative(armand)\nnot Agnate(armand)\nUnearthly(loren)\nnot Cisalpine(loren)\nBogus(loren)\nnot Ruminative(loren)\nnot Regulated(loren) -> not Bogus(loren)\nnot Regulated(ulberto) -> Avuncular(ulberto)\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and Cisalpine(x) -> Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Agnate(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Ruminative(x) and Regulated(x) -> not Avuncular(x))\nCisalpine(auberta) -> Unearthly(auberta)\n\nRegulated(loren)\n\nRegulated(loren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1433"} {"premises": "The clare cart the glenine. The clare is unvigilant. The clare bestow the reube. The glenine cart the harli. The glenine bestow the clare. The reube cart the glenine. The reube cart the harli. The reube is haematic. The reube bestow the clare. The reube tithe the harli. The harli cart the reube. The harli bestow the glenine. The harli bestow the reube. The harli tithe the glenine. The harli tithe the reube. If someone is unvigilant then they see the reube. If someone tithe the reube then they need the harli. If the glenine bestow the harli and the glenine tithe the reube then the glenine is doubled. The harli tithe the glenine.", "logic": "\nCart(clare, glenine)\nUnvigilant(clare)\nBestow(clare, reube)\nCart(glenine, harli)\nBestow(glenine, clare)\nCart(reube, glenine)\nCart(reube, harli)\nHaematic(reube)\nBestow(reube, clare)\nTithe(reube, harli)\nCart(harli, reube)\nBestow(harli, glenine)\nBestow(harli, reube)\nTithe(harli, glenine)\nTithe(harli, reube)\nforall x (Unvigilant(x) -> Tithe(x, reube))\nforall x (Tithe(x, reube) -> Bestow(x, harli))\nBestow(glenine, harli) and Tithe(glenine, reube) -> Doubled(glenine)\n\nTithe(harli, glenine)\n\ntherefore Tithe(harli, glenine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The rhianna pomade the janette. The rhianna is expired. The rhianna calliper the luciana. The janette pomade the nancy. The janette calliper the rhianna. The luciana pomade the janette. The luciana pomade the nancy. The luciana is sheltered. The luciana calliper the rhianna. The luciana hull the nancy. The nancy pomade the luciana. The nancy calliper the janette. The nancy calliper the luciana. The nancy hull the janette. The nancy hull the luciana. If someone is expired then they see the luciana. If someone hull the luciana then they need the nancy. If the janette calliper the nancy and the janette hull the luciana then the janette is bellyless. The nancy does not need the luciana.", "logic": "\nPomade(rhianna, janette)\nExpired(rhianna)\nCalliper(rhianna, luciana)\nPomade(janette, nancy)\nCalliper(janette, rhianna)\nPomade(luciana, janette)\nPomade(luciana, nancy)\nSheltered(luciana)\nCalliper(luciana, rhianna)\nHull(luciana, nancy)\nPomade(nancy, luciana)\nCalliper(nancy, janette)\nCalliper(nancy, luciana)\nHull(nancy, janette)\nHull(nancy, luciana)\nforall x (Expired(x) -> Hull(x, luciana))\nforall x (Hull(x, luciana) -> Calliper(x, nancy))\nCalliper(janette, nancy) and Hull(janette, luciana) -> Bellyless(janette)\n\nnot Calliper(nancy, luciana)\n\ntherefore Calliper(nancy, luciana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The walther mend the torey. The walther is overladen. The walther jaundice the natala. The torey mend the karyl. The torey jaundice the walther. The natala mend the torey. The natala mend the karyl. The natala is penile. The natala jaundice the walther. The natala dispel the karyl. The karyl mend the natala. The karyl jaundice the torey. The karyl jaundice the natala. The karyl dispel the torey. The karyl dispel the natala. If someone is overladen then they see the natala. If someone dispel the natala then they need the karyl. If the torey jaundice the karyl and the torey dispel the natala then the torey is anaphasic. The walther dispel the natala.", "logic": "\nMend(walther, torey)\nOverladen(walther)\nJaundice(walther, natala)\nMend(torey, karyl)\nJaundice(torey, walther)\nMend(natala, torey)\nMend(natala, karyl)\nPenile(natala)\nJaundice(natala, walther)\nDispel(natala, karyl)\nMend(karyl, natala)\nJaundice(karyl, torey)\nJaundice(karyl, natala)\nDispel(karyl, torey)\nDispel(karyl, natala)\nforall x (Overladen(x) -> Dispel(x, natala))\nforall x (Dispel(x, natala) -> Jaundice(x, karyl))\nJaundice(torey, karyl) and Dispel(torey, natala) -> Anaphasic(torey)\n\nDispel(walther, natala)\n\nOverladen(walther) and forall x (Overladen(x) -> Dispel(x, natala)) -> therefore Dispel(walther, natala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The pietro famish the tia. The pietro is amateur. The pietro mitigate the hamid. The tia famish the barbette. The tia mitigate the pietro. The hamid famish the tia. The hamid famish the barbette. The hamid is disturbing. The hamid mitigate the pietro. The hamid intern the barbette. The barbette famish the hamid. The barbette mitigate the tia. The barbette mitigate the hamid. The barbette intern the tia. The barbette intern the hamid. If someone is amateur then they see the hamid. If someone intern the hamid then they need the barbette. If the tia mitigate the barbette and the tia intern the hamid then the tia is amaurotic. The barbette does not need the barbette.", "logic": "\nFamish(pietro, tia)\nAmateur(pietro)\nMitigate(pietro, hamid)\nFamish(tia, barbette)\nMitigate(tia, pietro)\nFamish(hamid, tia)\nFamish(hamid, barbette)\nDisturbing(hamid)\nMitigate(hamid, pietro)\nIntern(hamid, barbette)\nFamish(barbette, hamid)\nMitigate(barbette, tia)\nMitigate(barbette, hamid)\nIntern(barbette, tia)\nIntern(barbette, hamid)\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Intern(x, hamid))\nforall x (Intern(x, hamid) -> Mitigate(x, barbette))\nMitigate(tia, barbette) and Intern(tia, hamid) -> Amaurotic(tia)\n\nnot Mitigate(barbette, barbette)\n\nIntern(barbette, hamid) and forall x (Intern(x, hamid) -> Mitigate(x, barbette)) -> therefore Mitigate(barbette, barbette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The rutledge radio the cobbie. The rutledge is unjust. The rutledge bollix the wilhelm. The cobbie radio the dulcine. The cobbie bollix the rutledge. The wilhelm radio the cobbie. The wilhelm radio the dulcine. The wilhelm is fleet. The wilhelm bollix the rutledge. The wilhelm augur the dulcine. The dulcine radio the wilhelm. The dulcine bollix the cobbie. The dulcine bollix the wilhelm. The dulcine augur the cobbie. The dulcine augur the wilhelm. If someone is unjust then they see the wilhelm. If someone augur the wilhelm then they need the dulcine. If the cobbie bollix the dulcine and the cobbie augur the wilhelm then the cobbie is inclined. The rutledge bollix the dulcine.", "logic": "\nRadio(rutledge, cobbie)\nUnjust(rutledge)\nBollix(rutledge, wilhelm)\nRadio(cobbie, dulcine)\nBollix(cobbie, rutledge)\nRadio(wilhelm, cobbie)\nRadio(wilhelm, dulcine)\nFleet(wilhelm)\nBollix(wilhelm, rutledge)\nAugur(wilhelm, dulcine)\nRadio(dulcine, wilhelm)\nBollix(dulcine, cobbie)\nBollix(dulcine, wilhelm)\nAugur(dulcine, cobbie)\nAugur(dulcine, wilhelm)\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Augur(x, wilhelm))\nforall x (Augur(x, wilhelm) -> Bollix(x, dulcine))\nBollix(cobbie, dulcine) and Augur(cobbie, wilhelm) -> Inclined(cobbie)\n\nBollix(rutledge, dulcine)\n\nUnjust(rutledge) and forall x (Unjust(x) -> Augur(x, wilhelm)) -> therefore Augur(rutledge, wilhelm) Augur(rutledge, wilhelm) and forall x (Augur(x, wilhelm) -> Bollix(x, dulcine)) -> therefore Bollix(rutledge, dulcine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The vanessa bourgeon the nevsa. The vanessa is foregoing. The vanessa blat the kylie. The nevsa bourgeon the corrina. The nevsa blat the vanessa. The kylie bourgeon the nevsa. The kylie bourgeon the corrina. The kylie is cumulative. The kylie blat the vanessa. The kylie backhand the corrina. The corrina bourgeon the kylie. The corrina blat the nevsa. The corrina blat the kylie. The corrina backhand the nevsa. The corrina backhand the kylie. If someone is foregoing then they see the kylie. If someone backhand the kylie then they need the corrina. If the nevsa blat the corrina and the nevsa backhand the kylie then the nevsa is queasy. The vanessa does not need the corrina.", "logic": "\nBourgeon(vanessa, nevsa)\nForegoing(vanessa)\nBlat(vanessa, kylie)\nBourgeon(nevsa, corrina)\nBlat(nevsa, vanessa)\nBourgeon(kylie, nevsa)\nBourgeon(kylie, corrina)\nCumulative(kylie)\nBlat(kylie, vanessa)\nBackhand(kylie, corrina)\nBourgeon(corrina, kylie)\nBlat(corrina, nevsa)\nBlat(corrina, kylie)\nBackhand(corrina, nevsa)\nBackhand(corrina, kylie)\nforall x (Foregoing(x) -> Backhand(x, kylie))\nforall x (Backhand(x, kylie) -> Blat(x, corrina))\nBlat(nevsa, corrina) and Backhand(nevsa, kylie) -> Queasy(nevsa)\n\nnot Blat(vanessa, corrina)\n\nForegoing(vanessa) and forall x (Foregoing(x) -> Backhand(x, kylie)) -> therefore Backhand(vanessa, kylie) Backhand(vanessa, kylie) and forall x (Backhand(x, kylie) -> Blat(x, corrina)) -> therefore Blat(vanessa, corrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The xylina instrument the myrtie. The xylina is southward. The xylina assonate the laurence. The myrtie instrument the jeremiah. The myrtie assonate the xylina. The laurence instrument the myrtie. The laurence instrument the jeremiah. The laurence is lxvi. The laurence assonate the xylina. The laurence rectify the jeremiah. The jeremiah instrument the laurence. The jeremiah assonate the myrtie. The jeremiah assonate the laurence. The jeremiah rectify the myrtie. The jeremiah rectify the laurence. If someone is southward then they see the laurence. If someone rectify the laurence then they need the jeremiah. If the myrtie assonate the jeremiah and the myrtie rectify the laurence then the myrtie is diabetic. The myrtie is not diabetic.", "logic": "\nInstrument(xylina, myrtie)\nSouthward(xylina)\nAssonate(xylina, laurence)\nInstrument(myrtie, jeremiah)\nAssonate(myrtie, xylina)\nInstrument(laurence, myrtie)\nInstrument(laurence, jeremiah)\nLxvi(laurence)\nAssonate(laurence, xylina)\nRectify(laurence, jeremiah)\nInstrument(jeremiah, laurence)\nAssonate(jeremiah, myrtie)\nAssonate(jeremiah, laurence)\nRectify(jeremiah, myrtie)\nRectify(jeremiah, laurence)\nforall x (Southward(x) -> Rectify(x, laurence))\nforall x (Rectify(x, laurence) -> Assonate(x, jeremiah))\nAssonate(myrtie, jeremiah) and Rectify(myrtie, laurence) -> Diabetic(myrtie)\n\nnot Diabetic(myrtie)\n\nAssonate(myrtie, jeremiah) and Rectify(myrtie, laurence) -> Diabetic(myrtie) <- forall x (Southward(x) -> Rectify(x, laurence)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The neil track the tabbi. The neil is mournful. The neil overwhelm the johannah. The tabbi track the asia. The tabbi overwhelm the neil. The johannah track the tabbi. The johannah track the asia. The johannah is attic. The johannah overwhelm the neil. The johannah void the asia. The asia track the johannah. The asia overwhelm the tabbi. The asia overwhelm the johannah. The asia void the tabbi. The asia void the johannah. If someone is mournful then they see the johannah. If someone void the johannah then they need the asia. If the tabbi overwhelm the asia and the tabbi void the johannah then the tabbi is seminude. The johannah void the johannah.", "logic": "\nTrack(neil, tabbi)\nMournful(neil)\nOverwhelm(neil, johannah)\nTrack(tabbi, asia)\nOverwhelm(tabbi, neil)\nTrack(johannah, tabbi)\nTrack(johannah, asia)\nAttic(johannah)\nOverwhelm(johannah, neil)\nVoid(johannah, asia)\nTrack(asia, johannah)\nOverwhelm(asia, tabbi)\nOverwhelm(asia, johannah)\nVoid(asia, tabbi)\nVoid(asia, johannah)\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Void(x, johannah))\nforall x (Void(x, johannah) -> Overwhelm(x, asia))\nOverwhelm(tabbi, asia) and Void(tabbi, johannah) -> Seminude(tabbi)\n\nVoid(johannah, johannah)\n\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Void(x, johannah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The gabriel epilate the chaddy. The gabriel is antennary. The gabriel elegize the mateo. The chaddy epilate the melli. The chaddy elegize the gabriel. The mateo epilate the chaddy. The mateo epilate the melli. The mateo is wormlike. The mateo elegize the gabriel. The mateo clinker the melli. The melli epilate the mateo. The melli elegize the chaddy. The melli elegize the mateo. The melli clinker the chaddy. The melli clinker the mateo. If someone is antennary then they see the mateo. If someone clinker the mateo then they need the melli. If the chaddy elegize the melli and the chaddy clinker the mateo then the chaddy is uncombed. The mateo does not need the melli.", "logic": "\nEpilate(gabriel, chaddy)\nAntennary(gabriel)\nElegize(gabriel, mateo)\nEpilate(chaddy, melli)\nElegize(chaddy, gabriel)\nEpilate(mateo, chaddy)\nEpilate(mateo, melli)\nWormlike(mateo)\nElegize(mateo, gabriel)\nClinker(mateo, melli)\nEpilate(melli, mateo)\nElegize(melli, chaddy)\nElegize(melli, mateo)\nClinker(melli, chaddy)\nClinker(melli, mateo)\nforall x (Antennary(x) -> Clinker(x, mateo))\nforall x (Clinker(x, mateo) -> Elegize(x, melli))\nElegize(chaddy, melli) and Clinker(chaddy, mateo) -> Uncombed(chaddy)\n\nnot Elegize(mateo, melli)\n\nforall x (Clinker(x, mateo) -> Elegize(x, melli)) <- forall x (Antennary(x) -> Clinker(x, mateo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The aurlie unbelt the ailina. The aurlie is mauritian. The aurlie cozen the anette. The ailina unbelt the rolando. The ailina cozen the aurlie. The anette unbelt the ailina. The anette unbelt the rolando. The anette is bottomless. The anette cozen the aurlie. The anette cocker the rolando. The rolando unbelt the anette. The rolando cozen the ailina. The rolando cozen the anette. The rolando cocker the ailina. The rolando cocker the anette. If someone is mauritian then they see the anette. If someone cocker the anette then they need the rolando. If the ailina cozen the rolando and the ailina cocker the anette then the ailina is hawkish. The aurlie cozen the aurlie.", "logic": "\nUnbelt(aurlie, ailina)\nMauritian(aurlie)\nCozen(aurlie, anette)\nUnbelt(ailina, rolando)\nCozen(ailina, aurlie)\nUnbelt(anette, ailina)\nUnbelt(anette, rolando)\nBottomless(anette)\nCozen(anette, aurlie)\nCocker(anette, rolando)\nUnbelt(rolando, anette)\nCozen(rolando, ailina)\nCozen(rolando, anette)\nCocker(rolando, ailina)\nCocker(rolando, anette)\nforall x (Mauritian(x) -> Cocker(x, anette))\nforall x (Cocker(x, anette) -> Cozen(x, rolando))\nCozen(ailina, rolando) and Cocker(ailina, anette) -> Hawkish(ailina)\n\nCozen(aurlie, aurlie)\n\nCozen(aurlie, aurlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The eydie file the laurens. The eydie is postal. The eydie dilate the darren. The laurens file the kalina. The laurens dilate the eydie. The darren file the laurens. The darren file the kalina. The darren is rubber. The darren dilate the eydie. The darren veer the kalina. The kalina file the darren. The kalina dilate the laurens. The kalina dilate the darren. The kalina veer the laurens. The kalina veer the darren. If someone is postal then they see the darren. If someone veer the darren then they need the kalina. If the laurens dilate the kalina and the laurens veer the darren then the laurens is chylaceous. The eydie does not need the laurens.", "logic": "\nFile(eydie, laurens)\nPostal(eydie)\nDilate(eydie, darren)\nFile(laurens, kalina)\nDilate(laurens, eydie)\nFile(darren, laurens)\nFile(darren, kalina)\nRubber(darren)\nDilate(darren, eydie)\nVeer(darren, kalina)\nFile(kalina, darren)\nDilate(kalina, laurens)\nDilate(kalina, darren)\nVeer(kalina, laurens)\nVeer(kalina, darren)\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Veer(x, darren))\nforall x (Veer(x, darren) -> Dilate(x, kalina))\nDilate(laurens, kalina) and Veer(laurens, darren) -> Chylaceous(laurens)\n\nnot Dilate(eydie, laurens)\n\nnot Dilate(eydie, laurens) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The dione suckle the joan. The dione is actuarial. The dione kibitz the fulvia. The joan suckle the marylinda. The joan kibitz the dione. The fulvia suckle the joan. The fulvia suckle the marylinda. The fulvia is heartening. The fulvia kibitz the dione. The fulvia mulct the marylinda. The marylinda suckle the fulvia. The marylinda kibitz the joan. The marylinda kibitz the fulvia. The marylinda mulct the joan. The marylinda mulct the fulvia. If someone is actuarial then they see the fulvia. If someone mulct the fulvia then they need the marylinda. If the joan kibitz the marylinda and the joan mulct the fulvia then the joan is stacked. The marylinda is stacked.", "logic": "\nSuckle(dione, joan)\nActuarial(dione)\nKibitz(dione, fulvia)\nSuckle(joan, marylinda)\nKibitz(joan, dione)\nSuckle(fulvia, joan)\nSuckle(fulvia, marylinda)\nHeartening(fulvia)\nKibitz(fulvia, dione)\nMulct(fulvia, marylinda)\nSuckle(marylinda, fulvia)\nKibitz(marylinda, joan)\nKibitz(marylinda, fulvia)\nMulct(marylinda, joan)\nMulct(marylinda, fulvia)\nforall x (Actuarial(x) -> Mulct(x, fulvia))\nforall x (Mulct(x, fulvia) -> Kibitz(x, marylinda))\nKibitz(joan, marylinda) and Mulct(joan, fulvia) -> Stacked(joan)\n\nStacked(marylinda)\n\nStacked(marylinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Norah is traveled. Norah is acceptive. Norah is benzylic. Estele is sunset. Estele is traveled. Estele is acceptive. Estele is benzylic. Estele is pneumonic. Estele is lunate. Estele is eastside. All lunate people are pneumonic. Nice, sunset people are lunate. All pneumonic people are traveled. If Norah is sunset then Norah is traveled. If Norah is acceptive then Norah is lunate. All acceptive people are benzylic. If someone is eastside then they are lunate. All traveled people are lunate. Estele is acceptive.", "logic": "\nTraveled(norah)\nAcceptive(norah)\nBenzylic(norah)\nSunset(estele)\nTraveled(estele)\nAcceptive(estele)\nBenzylic(estele)\nPneumonic(estele)\nLunate(estele)\nEastside(estele)\nforall x (Lunate(x) -> Pneumonic(x))\nforall x (Acceptive(x) and Sunset(x) -> Lunate(x))\nforall x (Pneumonic(x) -> Traveled(x))\nSunset(norah) -> Traveled(norah)\nAcceptive(norah) -> Lunate(norah)\nforall x (Acceptive(x) -> Benzylic(x))\nforall x (Eastside(x) -> Lunate(x))\nforall x (Traveled(x) -> Lunate(x))\n\nAcceptive(estele)\n\ntherefore Acceptive(estele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Velma is convulsive. Velma is nonrandom. Velma is basic. Shepard is semirigid. Shepard is convulsive. Shepard is nonrandom. Shepard is basic. Shepard is bibliotic. Shepard is diestrous. Shepard is bridgeable. All diestrous people are bibliotic. Nice, semirigid people are diestrous. All bibliotic people are convulsive. If Velma is semirigid then Velma is convulsive. If Velma is nonrandom then Velma is diestrous. All nonrandom people are basic. If someone is bridgeable then they are diestrous. All convulsive people are diestrous. Shepard is not semirigid.", "logic": "\nConvulsive(velma)\nNonrandom(velma)\nBasic(velma)\nSemirigid(shepard)\nConvulsive(shepard)\nNonrandom(shepard)\nBasic(shepard)\nBibliotic(shepard)\nDiestrous(shepard)\nBridgeable(shepard)\nforall x (Diestrous(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Diestrous(x))\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nSemirigid(velma) -> Convulsive(velma)\nNonrandom(velma) -> Diestrous(velma)\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) -> Basic(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> Diestrous(x))\nforall x (Convulsive(x) -> Diestrous(x))\n\nnot Semirigid(shepard)\n\ntherefore Semirigid(shepard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Saxon is unoriginal. Saxon is raucous. Saxon is mastoid. Deina is sticking. Deina is unoriginal. Deina is raucous. Deina is mastoid. Deina is gratuitous. Deina is anguished. Deina is agaze. All anguished people are gratuitous. Nice, sticking people are anguished. All gratuitous people are unoriginal. If Saxon is sticking then Saxon is unoriginal. If Saxon is raucous then Saxon is anguished. All raucous people are mastoid. If someone is agaze then they are anguished. All unoriginal people are anguished. Saxon is anguished.", "logic": "\nUnoriginal(saxon)\nRaucous(saxon)\nMastoid(saxon)\nSticking(deina)\nUnoriginal(deina)\nRaucous(deina)\nMastoid(deina)\nGratuitous(deina)\nAnguished(deina)\nAgaze(deina)\nforall x (Anguished(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) and Sticking(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nSticking(saxon) -> Unoriginal(saxon)\nRaucous(saxon) -> Anguished(saxon)\nforall x (Raucous(x) -> Mastoid(x))\nforall x (Agaze(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Unoriginal(x) -> Anguished(x))\n\nAnguished(saxon)\n\nUnoriginal(saxon) and forall x (Unoriginal(x) -> Anguished(x)) -> therefore Anguished(saxon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Marketa is malevolent. Marketa is dripless. Marketa is improving. Gabriela is uneager. Gabriela is malevolent. Gabriela is dripless. Gabriela is improving. Gabriela is wordy. Gabriela is latter. Gabriela is awheel. All latter people are wordy. Nice, uneager people are latter. All wordy people are malevolent. If Marketa is uneager then Marketa is malevolent. If Marketa is dripless then Marketa is latter. All dripless people are improving. If someone is awheel then they are latter. All malevolent people are latter. Marketa is not latter.", "logic": "\nMalevolent(marketa)\nDripless(marketa)\nImproving(marketa)\nUneager(gabriela)\nMalevolent(gabriela)\nDripless(gabriela)\nImproving(gabriela)\nWordy(gabriela)\nLatter(gabriela)\nAwheel(gabriela)\nforall x (Latter(x) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Dripless(x) and Uneager(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) -> Malevolent(x))\nUneager(marketa) -> Malevolent(marketa)\nDripless(marketa) -> Latter(marketa)\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Improving(x))\nforall x (Awheel(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Malevolent(x) -> Latter(x))\n\nnot Latter(marketa)\n\nMalevolent(marketa) and forall x (Malevolent(x) -> Latter(x)) -> therefore Latter(marketa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Rachel is ascending. Rachel is famished. Rachel is anechoic. Holley is indusial. Holley is ascending. Holley is famished. Holley is anechoic. Holley is unintended. Holley is cyclopean. Holley is worn. All cyclopean people are unintended. Nice, indusial people are cyclopean. All unintended people are ascending. If Rachel is indusial then Rachel is ascending. If Rachel is famished then Rachel is cyclopean. All famished people are anechoic. If someone is worn then they are cyclopean. All ascending people are cyclopean. Rachel is unintended.", "logic": "\nAscending(rachel)\nFamished(rachel)\nAnechoic(rachel)\nIndusial(holley)\nAscending(holley)\nFamished(holley)\nAnechoic(holley)\nUnintended(holley)\nCyclopean(holley)\nWorn(holley)\nforall x (Cyclopean(x) -> Unintended(x))\nforall x (Famished(x) and Indusial(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Unintended(x) -> Ascending(x))\nIndusial(rachel) -> Ascending(rachel)\nFamished(rachel) -> Cyclopean(rachel)\nforall x (Famished(x) -> Anechoic(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\n\nUnintended(rachel)\n\nAscending(rachel) and forall x (Ascending(x) -> Cyclopean(x)) -> therefore Cyclopean(rachel) Cyclopean(rachel) and forall x (Cyclopean(x) -> Unintended(x)) -> therefore Unintended(rachel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Joshuah is hurried. Joshuah is lowly. Joshuah is geodesical. Isabeau is lissom. Isabeau is hurried. Isabeau is lowly. Isabeau is geodesical. Isabeau is neapolitan. Isabeau is fiduciary. Isabeau is reflexive. All fiduciary people are neapolitan. Nice, lissom people are fiduciary. All neapolitan people are hurried. If Joshuah is lissom then Joshuah is hurried. If Joshuah is lowly then Joshuah is fiduciary. All lowly people are geodesical. If someone is reflexive then they are fiduciary. All hurried people are fiduciary. Joshuah is not neapolitan.", "logic": "\nHurried(joshuah)\nLowly(joshuah)\nGeodesical(joshuah)\nLissom(isabeau)\nHurried(isabeau)\nLowly(isabeau)\nGeodesical(isabeau)\nNeapolitan(isabeau)\nFiduciary(isabeau)\nReflexive(isabeau)\nforall x (Fiduciary(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\nforall x (Lowly(x) and Lissom(x) -> Fiduciary(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Hurried(x))\nLissom(joshuah) -> Hurried(joshuah)\nLowly(joshuah) -> Fiduciary(joshuah)\nforall x (Lowly(x) -> Geodesical(x))\nforall x (Reflexive(x) -> Fiduciary(x))\nforall x (Hurried(x) -> Fiduciary(x))\n\nnot Neapolitan(joshuah)\n\nHurried(joshuah) and forall x (Hurried(x) -> Fiduciary(x)) -> therefore Fiduciary(joshuah) Fiduciary(joshuah) and forall x (Fiduciary(x) -> Neapolitan(x)) -> therefore Neapolitan(joshuah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Kandace is peppery. Kandace is disarming. Kandace is nonionic. Lucien is coarctate. Lucien is peppery. Lucien is disarming. Lucien is nonionic. Lucien is unthinking. Lucien is inedible. Lucien is robotic. All inedible people are unthinking. Nice, coarctate people are inedible. All unthinking people are peppery. If Kandace is coarctate then Kandace is peppery. If Kandace is disarming then Kandace is inedible. All disarming people are nonionic. If someone is robotic then they are inedible. All peppery people are inedible. Kandace is not coarctate.", "logic": "\nPeppery(kandace)\nDisarming(kandace)\nNonionic(kandace)\nCoarctate(lucien)\nPeppery(lucien)\nDisarming(lucien)\nNonionic(lucien)\nUnthinking(lucien)\nInedible(lucien)\nRobotic(lucien)\nforall x (Inedible(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) and Coarctate(x) -> Inedible(x))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) -> Peppery(x))\nCoarctate(kandace) -> Peppery(kandace)\nDisarming(kandace) -> Inedible(kandace)\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Nonionic(x))\nforall x (Robotic(x) -> Inedible(x))\nforall x (Peppery(x) -> Inedible(x))\n\nnot Coarctate(kandace)\n\nnot Coarctate(kandace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Amery is batwing. Amery is levantine. Amery is momentous. Erhart is numberless. Erhart is batwing. Erhart is levantine. Erhart is momentous. Erhart is triplex. Erhart is iraqi. Erhart is cancerous. All iraqi people are triplex. Nice, numberless people are iraqi. All triplex people are batwing. If Amery is numberless then Amery is batwing. If Amery is levantine then Amery is iraqi. All levantine people are momentous. If someone is cancerous then they are iraqi. All batwing people are iraqi. Amery is cancerous.", "logic": "\nBatwing(amery)\nLevantine(amery)\nMomentous(amery)\nNumberless(erhart)\nBatwing(erhart)\nLevantine(erhart)\nMomentous(erhart)\nTriplex(erhart)\nIraqi(erhart)\nCancerous(erhart)\nforall x (Iraqi(x) -> Triplex(x))\nforall x (Levantine(x) and Numberless(x) -> Iraqi(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) -> Batwing(x))\nNumberless(amery) -> Batwing(amery)\nLevantine(amery) -> Iraqi(amery)\nforall x (Levantine(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> Iraqi(x))\nforall x (Batwing(x) -> Iraqi(x))\n\nCancerous(amery)\n\nCancerous(amery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1499"} {"premises": "Leena is onetime. Leena is not heliac. Leena is sugared. Leena is not spiraling. Leena is shivery. Leena is ringlike. Leena is procumbent. Cecilla is heliac. Cecilla is not ringlike. Gunvor is not onetime. Gunvor is not heliac. Gunvor is sugared. Gunvor is spiraling. Gunvor is shivery. Gunvor is ringlike. Gunvor is procumbent. If something is heliac and sugared then it is onetime. If Cecilla is procumbent then Cecilla is sugared. All onetime things are not spiraling. If Leena is spiraling then Leena is not sugared. White things are shivery. All onetime, spiraling things are sugared. If Cecilla is ringlike then Cecilla is heliac. If something is heliac and not ringlike then it is procumbent. Leena is procumbent.", "logic": "\nOnetime(leena)\nnot Heliac(leena)\nSugared(leena)\nnot Spiraling(leena)\nShivery(leena)\nRinglike(leena)\nProcumbent(leena)\nHeliac(cecilla)\nnot Ringlike(cecilla)\nnot Onetime(gunvor)\nnot Heliac(gunvor)\nSugared(gunvor)\nSpiraling(gunvor)\nShivery(gunvor)\nRinglike(gunvor)\nProcumbent(gunvor)\nforall x (Heliac(x) and Sugared(x) -> Onetime(x))\nProcumbent(cecilla) -> Sugared(cecilla)\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> not Spiraling(x))\nSpiraling(leena) -> not Sugared(leena)\nforall x (Ringlike(x) -> Shivery(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) and Spiraling(x) -> Sugared(x))\nRinglike(cecilla) -> Heliac(cecilla)\nforall x (Heliac(x) and not Ringlike(x) -> Procumbent(x))\n\nProcumbent(leena)\n\ntherefore Procumbent(leena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-992"} {"premises": "Brigitta is bulbar. Brigitta is not jarring. Brigitta is senegalese. Brigitta is not amygdaline. Brigitta is imperious. Brigitta is judicious. Brigitta is concessive. Nancie is jarring. Nancie is not judicious. Dan is not bulbar. Dan is not jarring. Dan is senegalese. Dan is amygdaline. Dan is imperious. Dan is judicious. Dan is concessive. If something is jarring and senegalese then it is bulbar. If Nancie is concessive then Nancie is senegalese. All bulbar things are not amygdaline. If Brigitta is amygdaline then Brigitta is not senegalese. White things are imperious. All bulbar, amygdaline things are senegalese. If Nancie is judicious then Nancie is jarring. If something is jarring and not judicious then it is concessive. Dan is not concessive.", "logic": "\nBulbar(brigitta)\nnot Jarring(brigitta)\nSenegalese(brigitta)\nnot Amygdaline(brigitta)\nImperious(brigitta)\nJudicious(brigitta)\nConcessive(brigitta)\nJarring(nancie)\nnot Judicious(nancie)\nnot Bulbar(dan)\nnot Jarring(dan)\nSenegalese(dan)\nAmygdaline(dan)\nImperious(dan)\nJudicious(dan)\nConcessive(dan)\nforall x (Jarring(x) and Senegalese(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nConcessive(nancie) -> Senegalese(nancie)\nforall x (Bulbar(x) -> not Amygdaline(x))\nAmygdaline(brigitta) -> not Senegalese(brigitta)\nforall x (Judicious(x) -> Imperious(x))\nforall x (Bulbar(x) and Amygdaline(x) -> Senegalese(x))\nJudicious(nancie) -> Jarring(nancie)\nforall x (Jarring(x) and not Judicious(x) -> Concessive(x))\n\nnot Concessive(dan)\n\ntherefore Concessive(dan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-992"} {"premises": "Teresina is ranging. Teresina is not effective. Teresina is unclipped. Teresina is not upmarket. Teresina is chthonic. Teresina is eucaryotic. Teresina is sardonic. Codie is effective. Codie is not eucaryotic. Quent is not ranging. Quent is not effective. Quent is unclipped. Quent is upmarket. Quent is chthonic. Quent is eucaryotic. Quent is sardonic. If something is effective and unclipped then it is ranging. If Codie is sardonic then Codie is unclipped. All ranging things are not upmarket. If Teresina is upmarket then Teresina is not unclipped. White things are chthonic. All ranging, upmarket things are unclipped. If Codie is eucaryotic then Codie is effective. If something is effective and not eucaryotic then it is sardonic. Codie is sardonic.", "logic": "\nRanging(teresina)\nnot Effective(teresina)\nUnclipped(teresina)\nnot Upmarket(teresina)\nChthonic(teresina)\nEucaryotic(teresina)\nSardonic(teresina)\nEffective(codie)\nnot Eucaryotic(codie)\nnot Ranging(quent)\nnot Effective(quent)\nUnclipped(quent)\nUpmarket(quent)\nChthonic(quent)\nEucaryotic(quent)\nSardonic(quent)\nforall x (Effective(x) and Unclipped(x) -> Ranging(x))\nSardonic(codie) -> Unclipped(codie)\nforall x (Ranging(x) -> not Upmarket(x))\nUpmarket(teresina) -> not Unclipped(teresina)\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Chthonic(x))\nforall x (Ranging(x) and Upmarket(x) -> Unclipped(x))\nEucaryotic(codie) -> Effective(codie)\nforall x (Effective(x) and not Eucaryotic(x) -> Sardonic(x))\n\nSardonic(codie)\n\nEffective(codie) and not Eucaryotic(codie) and forall x (Effective(x) and not Eucaryotic(x) -> Sardonic(x)) -> therefore Sardonic(codie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-992"} {"premises": "Merle is analogous. Merle is not half. Merle is devalued. Merle is not zonary. Merle is lowbrow. Merle is infected. Merle is inborn. Delcine is half. Delcine is not infected. Leonie is not analogous. Leonie is not half. Leonie is devalued. Leonie is zonary. Leonie is lowbrow. Leonie is infected. Leonie is inborn. If something is half and devalued then it is analogous. If Delcine is inborn then Delcine is devalued. All analogous things are not zonary. If Merle is zonary then Merle is not devalued. White things are lowbrow. All analogous, zonary things are devalued. If Delcine is infected then Delcine is half. If something is half and not infected then it is inborn. Delcine is not inborn.", "logic": "\nAnalogous(merle)\nnot Half(merle)\nDevalued(merle)\nnot Zonary(merle)\nLowbrow(merle)\nInfected(merle)\nInborn(merle)\nHalf(delcine)\nnot Infected(delcine)\nnot Analogous(leonie)\nnot Half(leonie)\nDevalued(leonie)\nZonary(leonie)\nLowbrow(leonie)\nInfected(leonie)\nInborn(leonie)\nforall x (Half(x) and Devalued(x) -> Analogous(x))\nInborn(delcine) -> Devalued(delcine)\nforall x (Analogous(x) -> not Zonary(x))\nZonary(merle) -> not Devalued(merle)\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) and Zonary(x) -> Devalued(x))\nInfected(delcine) -> Half(delcine)\nforall x (Half(x) and not Infected(x) -> Inborn(x))\n\nnot Inborn(delcine)\n\nHalf(delcine) and not Infected(delcine) and forall x (Half(x) and not Infected(x) -> Inborn(x)) -> therefore Inborn(delcine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-992"} {"premises": "Andie is crushed. Andie is not thalassic. Andie is predacious. Andie is not rascally. Andie is mutative. Andie is cordial. Andie is formidable. Rasla is thalassic. Rasla is not cordial. Tannie is not crushed. Tannie is not thalassic. Tannie is predacious. Tannie is rascally. Tannie is mutative. Tannie is cordial. Tannie is formidable. If something is thalassic and predacious then it is crushed. If Rasla is formidable then Rasla is predacious. All crushed things are not rascally. If Andie is rascally then Andie is not predacious. White things are mutative. All crushed, rascally things are predacious. If Rasla is cordial then Rasla is thalassic. If something is thalassic and not cordial then it is formidable. Rasla is predacious.", "logic": "\nCrushed(andie)\nnot Thalassic(andie)\nPredacious(andie)\nnot Rascally(andie)\nMutative(andie)\nCordial(andie)\nFormidable(andie)\nThalassic(rasla)\nnot Cordial(rasla)\nnot Crushed(tannie)\nnot Thalassic(tannie)\nPredacious(tannie)\nRascally(tannie)\nMutative(tannie)\nCordial(tannie)\nFormidable(tannie)\nforall x (Thalassic(x) and Predacious(x) -> Crushed(x))\nFormidable(rasla) -> Predacious(rasla)\nforall x (Crushed(x) -> not Rascally(x))\nRascally(andie) -> not Predacious(andie)\nforall x (Cordial(x) -> Mutative(x))\nforall x (Crushed(x) and Rascally(x) -> Predacious(x))\nCordial(rasla) -> Thalassic(rasla)\nforall x (Thalassic(x) and not Cordial(x) -> Formidable(x))\n\nPredacious(rasla)\n\nThalassic(rasla) and not Cordial(rasla) and forall x (Thalassic(x) and not Cordial(x) -> Formidable(x)) -> therefore Formidable(rasla) Formidable(rasla) and Formidable(rasla) -> Predacious(rasla) -> therefore Predacious(rasla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-992"} {"premises": "Hilarie is superable. Hilarie is not hydric. Hilarie is bimanual. Hilarie is not ancillary. Hilarie is unadjusted. Hilarie is sciolistic. Hilarie is calando. Alphonso is hydric. Alphonso is not sciolistic. Remington is not superable. Remington is not hydric. Remington is bimanual. Remington is ancillary. Remington is unadjusted. Remington is sciolistic. Remington is calando. If something is hydric and bimanual then it is superable. If Alphonso is calando then Alphonso is bimanual. All superable things are not ancillary. If Hilarie is ancillary then Hilarie is not bimanual. White things are unadjusted. All superable, ancillary things are bimanual. If Alphonso is sciolistic then Alphonso is hydric. If something is hydric and not sciolistic then it is calando. Alphonso is not bimanual.", "logic": "\nSuperable(hilarie)\nnot Hydric(hilarie)\nBimanual(hilarie)\nnot Ancillary(hilarie)\nUnadjusted(hilarie)\nSciolistic(hilarie)\nCalando(hilarie)\nHydric(alphonso)\nnot Sciolistic(alphonso)\nnot Superable(remington)\nnot Hydric(remington)\nBimanual(remington)\nAncillary(remington)\nUnadjusted(remington)\nSciolistic(remington)\nCalando(remington)\nforall x (Hydric(x) and Bimanual(x) -> Superable(x))\nCalando(alphonso) -> Bimanual(alphonso)\nforall x (Superable(x) -> not Ancillary(x))\nAncillary(hilarie) -> not Bimanual(hilarie)\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) -> Unadjusted(x))\nforall x (Superable(x) and Ancillary(x) -> Bimanual(x))\nSciolistic(alphonso) -> Hydric(alphonso)\nforall x (Hydric(x) and not Sciolistic(x) -> Calando(x))\n\nnot Bimanual(alphonso)\n\nHydric(alphonso) and not Sciolistic(alphonso) and forall x (Hydric(x) and not Sciolistic(x) -> Calando(x)) -> therefore Calando(alphonso) Calando(alphonso) and Calando(alphonso) -> Bimanual(alphonso) -> therefore Bimanual(alphonso)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-992"} {"premises": "The milly trash the leonhard. The winonah trash the milly. The leonhard dine the winonah. If someone distemper the winonah then they eat the winonah. If someone trash the leonhard then the leonhard distemper the winonah. If the winonah distemper the milly then the milly is lumpen. If someone trash the winonah then the winonah trash the milly. If someone trash the winonah and the winonah is uneasy then the winonah trash the leonhard. If someone dine the winonah and the winonah is stylistic then the winonah dine the leonhard. If someone trash the winonah and they eat the milly then the milly distemper the leonhard. If someone distemper the milly and they are lumpen then the milly distemper the leonhard. The winonah trash the milly.", "logic": "\nTrash(milly, leonhard)\nTrash(winonah, milly)\nDine(leonhard, winonah)\nforall x (Distemper(x, winonah) -> Trash(x, winonah))\nforall x (Trash(x, leonhard) -> Distemper(leonhard, winonah))\nDistemper(winonah, milly) -> Lumpen(milly)\nforall x (Trash(x, winonah) -> Trash(winonah, milly))\nforall x (Trash(x, winonah) and Uneasy(winonah) -> Trash(winonah, leonhard))\nforall x (Dine(x, winonah) and Stylistic(winonah) -> Dine(winonah, leonhard))\nforall x (Trash(x, winonah) and Trash(x, milly) -> Distemper(milly, leonhard))\nforall x (Distemper(x, milly) and Lumpen(x) -> Distemper(milly, leonhard))\n\nTrash(winonah, milly)\n\ntherefore Trash(winonah, milly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The dunstan perk the oswell. The neron perk the dunstan. The oswell favour the neron. If someone right the neron then they eat the neron. If someone perk the oswell then the oswell right the neron. If the neron right the dunstan then the dunstan is melted. If someone perk the neron then the neron perk the dunstan. If someone perk the neron and the neron is climatical then the neron perk the oswell. If someone favour the neron and the neron is unworried then the neron favour the oswell. If someone perk the neron and they eat the dunstan then the dunstan right the oswell. If someone right the dunstan and they are melted then the dunstan right the oswell. The oswell does not like the neron.", "logic": "\nPerk(dunstan, oswell)\nPerk(neron, dunstan)\nFavour(oswell, neron)\nforall x (Right(x, neron) -> Perk(x, neron))\nforall x (Perk(x, oswell) -> Right(oswell, neron))\nRight(neron, dunstan) -> Melted(dunstan)\nforall x (Perk(x, neron) -> Perk(neron, dunstan))\nforall x (Perk(x, neron) and Climatical(neron) -> Perk(neron, oswell))\nforall x (Favour(x, neron) and Unworried(neron) -> Favour(neron, oswell))\nforall x (Perk(x, neron) and Perk(x, dunstan) -> Right(dunstan, oswell))\nforall x (Right(x, dunstan) and Melted(x) -> Right(dunstan, oswell))\n\nnot Favour(oswell, neron)\n\ntherefore Favour(oswell, neron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The yvonne jollify the horatius. The udale jollify the yvonne. The horatius apologise the udale. If someone dart the udale then they eat the udale. If someone jollify the horatius then the horatius dart the udale. If the udale dart the yvonne then the yvonne is gray. If someone jollify the udale then the udale jollify the yvonne. If someone jollify the udale and the udale is welfarist then the udale jollify the horatius. If someone apologise the udale and the udale is cambodian then the udale apologise the horatius. If someone jollify the udale and they eat the yvonne then the yvonne dart the horatius. If someone dart the yvonne and they are gray then the yvonne dart the horatius. The horatius dart the udale.", "logic": "\nJollify(yvonne, horatius)\nJollify(udale, yvonne)\nApologise(horatius, udale)\nforall x (Dart(x, udale) -> Jollify(x, udale))\nforall x (Jollify(x, horatius) -> Dart(horatius, udale))\nDart(udale, yvonne) -> Gray(yvonne)\nforall x (Jollify(x, udale) -> Jollify(udale, yvonne))\nforall x (Jollify(x, udale) and Welfarist(udale) -> Jollify(udale, horatius))\nforall x (Apologise(x, udale) and Cambodian(udale) -> Apologise(udale, horatius))\nforall x (Jollify(x, udale) and Jollify(x, yvonne) -> Dart(yvonne, horatius))\nforall x (Dart(x, yvonne) and Gray(x) -> Dart(yvonne, horatius))\n\nDart(horatius, udale)\n\nJollify(yvonne, horatius) and forall x (Jollify(x, horatius) -> Dart(horatius, udale)) -> therefore Dart(horatius, udale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The cinda loll the clarence. The binky loll the cinda. The clarence canoodle the binky. If someone site the binky then they eat the binky. If someone loll the clarence then the clarence site the binky. If the binky site the cinda then the cinda is spartan. If someone loll the binky then the binky loll the cinda. If someone loll the binky and the binky is shrill then the binky loll the clarence. If someone canoodle the binky and the binky is accessory then the binky canoodle the clarence. If someone loll the binky and they eat the cinda then the cinda site the clarence. If someone site the cinda and they are spartan then the cinda site the clarence. The clarence does not need the binky.", "logic": "\nLoll(cinda, clarence)\nLoll(binky, cinda)\nCanoodle(clarence, binky)\nforall x (Site(x, binky) -> Loll(x, binky))\nforall x (Loll(x, clarence) -> Site(clarence, binky))\nSite(binky, cinda) -> Spartan(cinda)\nforall x (Loll(x, binky) -> Loll(binky, cinda))\nforall x (Loll(x, binky) and Shrill(binky) -> Loll(binky, clarence))\nforall x (Canoodle(x, binky) and Accessory(binky) -> Canoodle(binky, clarence))\nforall x (Loll(x, binky) and Loll(x, cinda) -> Site(cinda, clarence))\nforall x (Site(x, cinda) and Spartan(x) -> Site(cinda, clarence))\n\nnot Site(clarence, binky)\n\nLoll(cinda, clarence) and forall x (Loll(x, clarence) -> Site(clarence, binky)) -> therefore Site(clarence, binky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The maggy reship the madelin. The lianne reship the maggy. The madelin buckram the lianne. If someone junketeer the lianne then they eat the lianne. If someone reship the madelin then the madelin junketeer the lianne. If the lianne junketeer the maggy then the maggy is unmingled. If someone reship the lianne then the lianne reship the maggy. If someone reship the lianne and the lianne is unfeigned then the lianne reship the madelin. If someone buckram the lianne and the lianne is jihadi then the lianne buckram the madelin. If someone reship the lianne and they eat the maggy then the maggy junketeer the madelin. If someone junketeer the maggy and they are unmingled then the maggy junketeer the madelin. The madelin reship the lianne.", "logic": "\nReship(maggy, madelin)\nReship(lianne, maggy)\nBuckram(madelin, lianne)\nforall x (Junketeer(x, lianne) -> Reship(x, lianne))\nforall x (Reship(x, madelin) -> Junketeer(madelin, lianne))\nJunketeer(lianne, maggy) -> Unmingled(maggy)\nforall x (Reship(x, lianne) -> Reship(lianne, maggy))\nforall x (Reship(x, lianne) and Unfeigned(lianne) -> Reship(lianne, madelin))\nforall x (Buckram(x, lianne) and Jihadi(lianne) -> Buckram(lianne, madelin))\nforall x (Reship(x, lianne) and Reship(x, maggy) -> Junketeer(maggy, madelin))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, maggy) and Unmingled(x) -> Junketeer(maggy, madelin))\n\nReship(madelin, lianne)\n\nReship(maggy, madelin) and forall x (Reship(x, madelin) -> Junketeer(madelin, lianne)) -> therefore Junketeer(madelin, lianne) Junketeer(madelin, lianne) and forall x (Junketeer(x, lianne) -> Reship(x, lianne)) -> therefore Reship(madelin, lianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The allin angle the marcelia. The sibelle angle the allin. The marcelia carol the sibelle. If someone decoke the sibelle then they eat the sibelle. If someone angle the marcelia then the marcelia decoke the sibelle. If the sibelle decoke the allin then the allin is toupeed. If someone angle the sibelle then the sibelle angle the allin. If someone angle the sibelle and the sibelle is maltreated then the sibelle angle the marcelia. If someone carol the sibelle and the sibelle is epical then the sibelle carol the marcelia. If someone angle the sibelle and they eat the allin then the allin decoke the marcelia. If someone decoke the allin and they are toupeed then the allin decoke the marcelia. The marcelia does not eat the sibelle.", "logic": "\nAngle(allin, marcelia)\nAngle(sibelle, allin)\nCarol(marcelia, sibelle)\nforall x (Decoke(x, sibelle) -> Angle(x, sibelle))\nforall x (Angle(x, marcelia) -> Decoke(marcelia, sibelle))\nDecoke(sibelle, allin) -> Toupeed(allin)\nforall x (Angle(x, sibelle) -> Angle(sibelle, allin))\nforall x (Angle(x, sibelle) and Maltreated(sibelle) -> Angle(sibelle, marcelia))\nforall x (Carol(x, sibelle) and Epical(sibelle) -> Carol(sibelle, marcelia))\nforall x (Angle(x, sibelle) and Angle(x, allin) -> Decoke(allin, marcelia))\nforall x (Decoke(x, allin) and Toupeed(x) -> Decoke(allin, marcelia))\n\nnot Angle(marcelia, sibelle)\n\nAngle(allin, marcelia) and forall x (Angle(x, marcelia) -> Decoke(marcelia, sibelle)) -> therefore Decoke(marcelia, sibelle) Decoke(marcelia, sibelle) and forall x (Decoke(x, sibelle) -> Angle(x, sibelle)) -> therefore Angle(marcelia, sibelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The idelle attract the ismail. The sloane attract the idelle. The ismail slump the sloane. If someone park the sloane then they eat the sloane. If someone attract the ismail then the ismail park the sloane. If the sloane park the idelle then the idelle is whispered. If someone attract the sloane then the sloane attract the idelle. If someone attract the sloane and the sloane is honourable then the sloane attract the ismail. If someone slump the sloane and the sloane is steerable then the sloane slump the ismail. If someone attract the sloane and they eat the idelle then the idelle park the ismail. If someone park the idelle and they are whispered then the idelle park the ismail. The idelle does not eat the sloane.", "logic": "\nAttract(idelle, ismail)\nAttract(sloane, idelle)\nSlump(ismail, sloane)\nforall x (Park(x, sloane) -> Attract(x, sloane))\nforall x (Attract(x, ismail) -> Park(ismail, sloane))\nPark(sloane, idelle) -> Whispered(idelle)\nforall x (Attract(x, sloane) -> Attract(sloane, idelle))\nforall x (Attract(x, sloane) and Honourable(sloane) -> Attract(sloane, ismail))\nforall x (Slump(x, sloane) and Steerable(sloane) -> Slump(sloane, ismail))\nforall x (Attract(x, sloane) and Attract(x, idelle) -> Park(idelle, ismail))\nforall x (Park(x, idelle) and Whispered(x) -> Park(idelle, ismail))\n\nnot Attract(idelle, sloane)\n\nforall x (Park(x, sloane) -> Attract(x, sloane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The jolyn pyramid the ealasaid. The dimitrios pyramid the jolyn. The ealasaid crispen the dimitrios. If someone forearm the dimitrios then they eat the dimitrios. If someone pyramid the ealasaid then the ealasaid forearm the dimitrios. If the dimitrios forearm the jolyn then the jolyn is late. If someone pyramid the dimitrios then the dimitrios pyramid the jolyn. If someone pyramid the dimitrios and the dimitrios is adjectival then the dimitrios pyramid the ealasaid. If someone crispen the dimitrios and the dimitrios is saturated then the dimitrios crispen the ealasaid. If someone pyramid the dimitrios and they eat the jolyn then the jolyn forearm the ealasaid. If someone forearm the jolyn and they are late then the jolyn forearm the ealasaid. The jolyn is late.", "logic": "\nPyramid(jolyn, ealasaid)\nPyramid(dimitrios, jolyn)\nCrispen(ealasaid, dimitrios)\nforall x (Forearm(x, dimitrios) -> Pyramid(x, dimitrios))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, ealasaid) -> Forearm(ealasaid, dimitrios))\nForearm(dimitrios, jolyn) -> Late(jolyn)\nforall x (Pyramid(x, dimitrios) -> Pyramid(dimitrios, jolyn))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, dimitrios) and Adjectival(dimitrios) -> Pyramid(dimitrios, ealasaid))\nforall x (Crispen(x, dimitrios) and Saturated(dimitrios) -> Crispen(dimitrios, ealasaid))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, dimitrios) and Pyramid(x, jolyn) -> Forearm(jolyn, ealasaid))\nforall x (Forearm(x, jolyn) and Late(x) -> Forearm(jolyn, ealasaid))\n\nLate(jolyn)\n\nForearm(dimitrios, jolyn) -> Late(jolyn) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The dena blank the pip. The fey blank the dena. The pip deplete the fey. If someone frustrate the fey then they eat the fey. If someone blank the pip then the pip frustrate the fey. If the fey frustrate the dena then the dena is aldehydic. If someone blank the fey then the fey blank the dena. If someone blank the fey and the fey is sulfuric then the fey blank the pip. If someone deplete the fey and the fey is battered then the fey deplete the pip. If someone blank the fey and they eat the dena then the dena frustrate the pip. If someone frustrate the dena and they are aldehydic then the dena frustrate the pip. The dena does not need the pip.", "logic": "\nBlank(dena, pip)\nBlank(fey, dena)\nDeplete(pip, fey)\nforall x (Frustrate(x, fey) -> Blank(x, fey))\nforall x (Blank(x, pip) -> Frustrate(pip, fey))\nFrustrate(fey, dena) -> Aldehydic(dena)\nforall x (Blank(x, fey) -> Blank(fey, dena))\nforall x (Blank(x, fey) and Sulfuric(fey) -> Blank(fey, pip))\nforall x (Deplete(x, fey) and Battered(fey) -> Deplete(fey, pip))\nforall x (Blank(x, fey) and Blank(x, dena) -> Frustrate(dena, pip))\nforall x (Frustrate(x, dena) and Aldehydic(x) -> Frustrate(dena, pip))\n\nnot Frustrate(dena, pip)\n\nforall x (Blank(x, fey) and Blank(x, dena) -> Frustrate(dena, pip)) <- forall x (Frustrate(x, fey) -> Blank(x, fey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The faun weigh the honey. The kassia weigh the faun. The honey foregather the kassia. If someone combine the kassia then they eat the kassia. If someone weigh the honey then the honey combine the kassia. If the kassia combine the faun then the faun is bilabiate. If someone weigh the kassia then the kassia weigh the faun. If someone weigh the kassia and the kassia is centrist then the kassia weigh the honey. If someone foregather the kassia and the kassia is fourteenth then the kassia foregather the honey. If someone weigh the kassia and they eat the faun then the faun combine the honey. If someone combine the faun and they are bilabiate then the faun combine the honey. The kassia foregather the kassia.", "logic": "\nWeigh(faun, honey)\nWeigh(kassia, faun)\nForegather(honey, kassia)\nforall x (Combine(x, kassia) -> Weigh(x, kassia))\nforall x (Weigh(x, honey) -> Combine(honey, kassia))\nCombine(kassia, faun) -> Bilabiate(faun)\nforall x (Weigh(x, kassia) -> Weigh(kassia, faun))\nforall x (Weigh(x, kassia) and Centrist(kassia) -> Weigh(kassia, honey))\nforall x (Foregather(x, kassia) and Fourteenth(kassia) -> Foregather(kassia, honey))\nforall x (Weigh(x, kassia) and Weigh(x, faun) -> Combine(faun, honey))\nforall x (Combine(x, faun) and Bilabiate(x) -> Combine(faun, honey))\n\nForegather(kassia, kassia)\n\nForegather(kassia, kassia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The calley interlard the kimberli. The kendrick interlard the calley. The kimberli frost the kendrick. If someone hemorrhage the kendrick then they eat the kendrick. If someone interlard the kimberli then the kimberli hemorrhage the kendrick. If the kendrick hemorrhage the calley then the calley is aeolian. If someone interlard the kendrick then the kendrick interlard the calley. If someone interlard the kendrick and the kendrick is sapid then the kendrick interlard the kimberli. If someone frost the kendrick and the kendrick is emphasized then the kendrick frost the kimberli. If someone interlard the kendrick and they eat the calley then the calley hemorrhage the kimberli. If someone hemorrhage the calley and they are aeolian then the calley hemorrhage the kimberli. The kimberli does not need the kimberli.", "logic": "\nInterlard(calley, kimberli)\nInterlard(kendrick, calley)\nFrost(kimberli, kendrick)\nforall x (Hemorrhage(x, kendrick) -> Interlard(x, kendrick))\nforall x (Interlard(x, kimberli) -> Hemorrhage(kimberli, kendrick))\nHemorrhage(kendrick, calley) -> Aeolian(calley)\nforall x (Interlard(x, kendrick) -> Interlard(kendrick, calley))\nforall x (Interlard(x, kendrick) and Sapid(kendrick) -> Interlard(kendrick, kimberli))\nforall x (Frost(x, kendrick) and Emphasized(kendrick) -> Frost(kendrick, kimberli))\nforall x (Interlard(x, kendrick) and Interlard(x, calley) -> Hemorrhage(calley, kimberli))\nforall x (Hemorrhage(x, calley) and Aeolian(x) -> Hemorrhage(calley, kimberli))\n\nnot Hemorrhage(kimberli, kimberli)\n\nnot Hemorrhage(kimberli, kimberli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "The carmina ptyalize the aloysius. The ivor ptyalize the carmina. The aloysius snivel the ivor. If someone caseate the ivor then they eat the ivor. If someone ptyalize the aloysius then the aloysius caseate the ivor. If the ivor caseate the carmina then the carmina is fragile. If someone ptyalize the ivor then the ivor ptyalize the carmina. If someone ptyalize the ivor and the ivor is downtown then the ivor ptyalize the aloysius. If someone snivel the ivor and the ivor is chanceful then the ivor snivel the aloysius. If someone ptyalize the ivor and they eat the carmina then the carmina caseate the aloysius. If someone caseate the carmina and they are fragile then the carmina caseate the aloysius. The ivor caseate the aloysius.", "logic": "\nPtyalize(carmina, aloysius)\nPtyalize(ivor, carmina)\nSnivel(aloysius, ivor)\nforall x (Caseate(x, ivor) -> Ptyalize(x, ivor))\nforall x (Ptyalize(x, aloysius) -> Caseate(aloysius, ivor))\nCaseate(ivor, carmina) -> Fragile(carmina)\nforall x (Ptyalize(x, ivor) -> Ptyalize(ivor, carmina))\nforall x (Ptyalize(x, ivor) and Downtown(ivor) -> Ptyalize(ivor, aloysius))\nforall x (Snivel(x, ivor) and Chanceful(ivor) -> Snivel(ivor, aloysius))\nforall x (Ptyalize(x, ivor) and Ptyalize(x, carmina) -> Caseate(carmina, aloysius))\nforall x (Caseate(x, carmina) and Fragile(x) -> Caseate(carmina, aloysius))\n\nCaseate(ivor, aloysius)\n\nCaseate(ivor, aloysius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1082"} {"premises": "Jeannette is ovine. Jeannette is enviable. Jeannette is radial. Jeannette is pushy. Jeannette is desperate. Camila is ovine. Camila is desperate. Chelsy is pushy. Nelia is ovine. Nelia is radial. Nelia is pushy. Nelia is desperate. If Nelia is pushy and Nelia is copious then Nelia is enviable. If someone is ovine then they are copious. Camila is desperate.", "logic": "\nOvine(jeannette)\nEnviable(jeannette)\nRadial(jeannette)\nPushy(jeannette)\nDesperate(jeannette)\nOvine(camila)\nDesperate(camila)\nPushy(chelsy)\nOvine(nelia)\nRadial(nelia)\nPushy(nelia)\nDesperate(nelia)\nPushy(nelia) and Copious(nelia) -> Enviable(nelia)\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> Copious(x))\n\nDesperate(camila)\n\ntherefore Desperate(camila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Romonda is tinned. Romonda is campy. Romonda is hanoverian. Romonda is edwardian. Romonda is concordant. Clayborn is tinned. Clayborn is concordant. Juergen is edwardian. Brodie is tinned. Brodie is hanoverian. Brodie is edwardian. Brodie is concordant. If Brodie is edwardian and Brodie is yellowish then Brodie is campy. If someone is tinned then they are yellowish. Romonda is not hanoverian.", "logic": "\nTinned(romonda)\nCampy(romonda)\nHanoverian(romonda)\nEdwardian(romonda)\nConcordant(romonda)\nTinned(clayborn)\nConcordant(clayborn)\nEdwardian(juergen)\nTinned(brodie)\nHanoverian(brodie)\nEdwardian(brodie)\nConcordant(brodie)\nEdwardian(brodie) and Yellowish(brodie) -> Campy(brodie)\nforall x (Tinned(x) -> Yellowish(x))\n\nnot Hanoverian(romonda)\n\ntherefore Hanoverian(romonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Lulu is vapourish. Lulu is marketable. Lulu is rearward. Lulu is latvian. Lulu is starving. Row is vapourish. Row is starving. Davin is latvian. Shalom is vapourish. Shalom is rearward. Shalom is latvian. Shalom is starving. If Shalom is latvian and Shalom is weepy then Shalom is marketable. If someone is vapourish then they are weepy. Lulu is weepy.", "logic": "\nVapourish(lulu)\nMarketable(lulu)\nRearward(lulu)\nLatvian(lulu)\nStarving(lulu)\nVapourish(row)\nStarving(row)\nLatvian(davin)\nVapourish(shalom)\nRearward(shalom)\nLatvian(shalom)\nStarving(shalom)\nLatvian(shalom) and Weepy(shalom) -> Marketable(shalom)\nforall x (Vapourish(x) -> Weepy(x))\n\nWeepy(lulu)\n\nVapourish(lulu) and forall x (Vapourish(x) -> Weepy(x)) -> therefore Weepy(lulu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Dione is adscripted. Dione is diestrous. Dione is simple. Dione is interested. Dione is charitable. Collins is adscripted. Collins is charitable. Connor is interested. Carolina is adscripted. Carolina is simple. Carolina is interested. Carolina is charitable. If Carolina is interested and Carolina is frolicsome then Carolina is diestrous. If someone is adscripted then they are frolicsome. Dione is not frolicsome.", "logic": "\nAdscripted(dione)\nDiestrous(dione)\nSimple(dione)\nInterested(dione)\nCharitable(dione)\nAdscripted(collins)\nCharitable(collins)\nInterested(connor)\nAdscripted(carolina)\nSimple(carolina)\nInterested(carolina)\nCharitable(carolina)\nInterested(carolina) and Frolicsome(carolina) -> Diestrous(carolina)\nforall x (Adscripted(x) -> Frolicsome(x))\n\nnot Frolicsome(dione)\n\nAdscripted(dione) and forall x (Adscripted(x) -> Frolicsome(x)) -> therefore Frolicsome(dione)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Celinka is luckless. Celinka is prosthetic. Celinka is unarguable. Celinka is amber. Celinka is aurorean. Percy is luckless. Percy is aurorean. Joe is amber. Brynne is luckless. Brynne is unarguable. Brynne is amber. Brynne is aurorean. If Brynne is amber and Brynne is balanced then Brynne is prosthetic. If someone is luckless then they are balanced. Brynne is prosthetic.", "logic": "\nLuckless(celinka)\nProsthetic(celinka)\nUnarguable(celinka)\nAmber(celinka)\nAurorean(celinka)\nLuckless(percy)\nAurorean(percy)\nAmber(joe)\nLuckless(brynne)\nUnarguable(brynne)\nAmber(brynne)\nAurorean(brynne)\nAmber(brynne) and Balanced(brynne) -> Prosthetic(brynne)\nforall x (Luckless(x) -> Balanced(x))\n\nProsthetic(brynne)\n\nLuckless(brynne) and forall x (Luckless(x) -> Balanced(x)) -> therefore Balanced(brynne) Amber(brynne) and Balanced(brynne) and Amber(brynne) and Balanced(brynne) -> Prosthetic(brynne) -> therefore Prosthetic(brynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Rubie is pilotless. Rubie is thumping. Rubie is italic. Rubie is thinkable. Rubie is moved. Alfredo is pilotless. Alfredo is moved. Dorotea is thinkable. Doro is pilotless. Doro is italic. Doro is thinkable. Doro is moved. If Doro is thinkable and Doro is decisive then Doro is thumping. If someone is pilotless then they are decisive. Doro is not thumping.", "logic": "\nPilotless(rubie)\nThumping(rubie)\nItalic(rubie)\nThinkable(rubie)\nMoved(rubie)\nPilotless(alfredo)\nMoved(alfredo)\nThinkable(dorotea)\nPilotless(doro)\nItalic(doro)\nThinkable(doro)\nMoved(doro)\nThinkable(doro) and Decisive(doro) -> Thumping(doro)\nforall x (Pilotless(x) -> Decisive(x))\n\nnot Thumping(doro)\n\nPilotless(doro) and forall x (Pilotless(x) -> Decisive(x)) -> therefore Decisive(doro) Thinkable(doro) and Decisive(doro) and Thinkable(doro) and Decisive(doro) -> Thumping(doro) -> therefore Thumping(doro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Lynnett is conceptive. Lynnett is toothy. Lynnett is downfield. Lynnett is supplicant. Lynnett is verrucose. Gussi is conceptive. Gussi is verrucose. Alecia is supplicant. Etta is conceptive. Etta is downfield. Etta is supplicant. Etta is verrucose. If Etta is supplicant and Etta is teenage then Etta is toothy. If someone is conceptive then they are teenage. Alecia is not teenage.", "logic": "\nConceptive(lynnett)\nToothy(lynnett)\nDownfield(lynnett)\nSupplicant(lynnett)\nVerrucose(lynnett)\nConceptive(gussi)\nVerrucose(gussi)\nSupplicant(alecia)\nConceptive(etta)\nDownfield(etta)\nSupplicant(etta)\nVerrucose(etta)\nSupplicant(etta) and Teenage(etta) -> Toothy(etta)\nforall x (Conceptive(x) -> Teenage(x))\n\nnot Teenage(alecia)\n\nforall x (Conceptive(x) -> Teenage(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Garry is xxvii. Garry is unrevealed. Garry is forbidding. Garry is direful. Garry is ardent. Robert is xxvii. Robert is ardent. Gwyn is direful. Susie is xxvii. Susie is forbidding. Susie is direful. Susie is ardent. If Susie is direful and Susie is valueless then Susie is unrevealed. If someone is xxvii then they are valueless. Robert is furry.", "logic": "\nXxvii(garry)\nUnrevealed(garry)\nForbidding(garry)\nDireful(garry)\nArdent(garry)\nXxvii(robert)\nArdent(robert)\nDireful(gwyn)\nXxvii(susie)\nForbidding(susie)\nDireful(susie)\nArdent(susie)\nDireful(susie) and Valueless(susie) -> Unrevealed(susie)\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> Valueless(x))\n\nFurry(robert)\n\nFurry(robert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Tori is detectable. Tori is anomic. Tori is cephalopod. Tori is skittish. Tori is unearned. Netti is detectable. Netti is unearned. Eben is skittish. Miguela is detectable. Miguela is cephalopod. Miguela is skittish. Miguela is unearned. If Miguela is skittish and Miguela is uncombable then Miguela is anomic. If someone is detectable then they are uncombable. Miguela is not furry.", "logic": "\nDetectable(tori)\nAnomic(tori)\nCephalopod(tori)\nSkittish(tori)\nUnearned(tori)\nDetectable(netti)\nUnearned(netti)\nSkittish(eben)\nDetectable(miguela)\nCephalopod(miguela)\nSkittish(miguela)\nUnearned(miguela)\nSkittish(miguela) and Uncombable(miguela) -> Anomic(miguela)\nforall x (Detectable(x) -> Uncombable(x))\n\nnot Furry(miguela)\n\nnot Furry(miguela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Emmett is calculated. Emmett is petaled. Emmett is tendinous. Emmett is copious. Emmett is bended. Magdalene is calculated. Magdalene is bended. Flem is copious. Marcel is calculated. Marcel is tendinous. Marcel is copious. Marcel is bended. If Marcel is copious and Marcel is abashed then Marcel is petaled. If someone is calculated then they are abashed. Magdalene is tendinous.", "logic": "\nCalculated(emmett)\nPetaled(emmett)\nTendinous(emmett)\nCopious(emmett)\nBended(emmett)\nCalculated(magdalene)\nBended(magdalene)\nCopious(flem)\nCalculated(marcel)\nTendinous(marcel)\nCopious(marcel)\nBended(marcel)\nCopious(marcel) and Abashed(marcel) -> Petaled(marcel)\nforall x (Calculated(x) -> Abashed(x))\n\nTendinous(magdalene)\n\nTendinous(magdalene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Loraine is sciatic. Loraine is dendritic. Loraine is grieving. Loraine is metameric. Loraine is acanthotic. Mort is sciatic. Mort is acanthotic. Welbie is metameric. Isahella is sciatic. Isahella is grieving. Isahella is metameric. Isahella is acanthotic. If Isahella is metameric and Isahella is resurgent then Isahella is dendritic. If someone is sciatic then they are resurgent. Welbie is not furry.", "logic": "\nSciatic(loraine)\nDendritic(loraine)\nGrieving(loraine)\nMetameric(loraine)\nAcanthotic(loraine)\nSciatic(mort)\nAcanthotic(mort)\nMetameric(welbie)\nSciatic(isahella)\nGrieving(isahella)\nMetameric(isahella)\nAcanthotic(isahella)\nMetameric(isahella) and Resurgent(isahella) -> Dendritic(isahella)\nforall x (Sciatic(x) -> Resurgent(x))\n\nnot Furry(welbie)\n\nnot Furry(welbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "Brittan is romansh. Brittan is lukewarm. Brittan is unsociable. Brittan is laurelled. Brittan is zymotic. Gonzales is romansh. Gonzales is zymotic. Rhett is laurelled. Antonia is romansh. Antonia is unsociable. Antonia is laurelled. Antonia is zymotic. If Antonia is laurelled and Antonia is offish then Antonia is lukewarm. If someone is romansh then they are offish. Rhett is romansh.", "logic": "\nRomansh(brittan)\nLukewarm(brittan)\nUnsociable(brittan)\nLaurelled(brittan)\nZymotic(brittan)\nRomansh(gonzales)\nZymotic(gonzales)\nLaurelled(rhett)\nRomansh(antonia)\nUnsociable(antonia)\nLaurelled(antonia)\nZymotic(antonia)\nLaurelled(antonia) and Offish(antonia) -> Lukewarm(antonia)\nforall x (Romansh(x) -> Offish(x))\n\nRomansh(rhett)\n\nRomansh(rhett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-689"} {"premises": "The ira lade the ibrahim. The dabney is not broadside. The zach lade the ibrahim. The ibrahim schematise the dabney. If something lade the dabney and the dabney schematise the ibrahim then the ibrahim is broadside. If something schematise the ira then the ira elate the ibrahim. If the zach elate the ibrahim and the dabney does not need the zach then the zach schematise the ibrahim. If something lade the ibrahim then the ibrahim schematise the ira. If something schematise the dabney then it is neonatal. If something is neonatal and it does not like the ira then it elate the ira. The ibrahim schematise the dabney.", "logic": "\nLade(ira, ibrahim)\nnot Broadside(dabney)\nLade(zach, ibrahim)\nSchematise(ibrahim, dabney)\nforall x (Lade(x, dabney) and Schematise(dabney, ibrahim) -> Broadside(ibrahim))\nforall x (Schematise(x, ira) -> Elate(ira, ibrahim))\nElate(zach, ibrahim) and not Lade(dabney, zach) -> Schematise(zach, ibrahim)\nforall x (Lade(x, ibrahim) -> Schematise(ibrahim, ira))\nforall x (Schematise(x, dabney) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) and not Schematise(x, ira) -> Elate(x, ira))\n\nSchematise(ibrahim, dabney)\n\ntherefore Schematise(ibrahim, dabney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The beverlie centralize the geralda. The agna is not boronic. The baird centralize the geralda. The geralda outfox the agna. If something centralize the agna and the agna outfox the geralda then the geralda is boronic. If something outfox the beverlie then the beverlie unsnarl the geralda. If the baird unsnarl the geralda and the agna does not need the baird then the baird outfox the geralda. If something centralize the geralda then the geralda outfox the beverlie. If something outfox the agna then it is flickering. If something is flickering and it does not like the beverlie then it unsnarl the beverlie. The beverlie does not need the geralda.", "logic": "\nCentralize(beverlie, geralda)\nnot Boronic(agna)\nCentralize(baird, geralda)\nOutfox(geralda, agna)\nforall x (Centralize(x, agna) and Outfox(agna, geralda) -> Boronic(geralda))\nforall x (Outfox(x, beverlie) -> Unsnarl(beverlie, geralda))\nUnsnarl(baird, geralda) and not Centralize(agna, baird) -> Outfox(baird, geralda)\nforall x (Centralize(x, geralda) -> Outfox(geralda, beverlie))\nforall x (Outfox(x, agna) -> Flickering(x))\nforall x (Flickering(x) and not Outfox(x, beverlie) -> Unsnarl(x, beverlie))\n\nnot Centralize(beverlie, geralda)\n\ntherefore Centralize(beverlie, geralda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The lise chelate the reta. The lura is not pagan. The ferdy chelate the reta. The reta embrace the lura. If something chelate the lura and the lura embrace the reta then the reta is pagan. If something embrace the lise then the lise darn the reta. If the ferdy darn the reta and the lura does not need the ferdy then the ferdy embrace the reta. If something chelate the reta then the reta embrace the lise. If something embrace the lura then it is waking. If something is waking and it does not like the lise then it darn the lise. The reta is waking.", "logic": "\nChelate(lise, reta)\nnot Pagan(lura)\nChelate(ferdy, reta)\nEmbrace(reta, lura)\nforall x (Chelate(x, lura) and Embrace(lura, reta) -> Pagan(reta))\nforall x (Embrace(x, lise) -> Darn(lise, reta))\nDarn(ferdy, reta) and not Chelate(lura, ferdy) -> Embrace(ferdy, reta)\nforall x (Chelate(x, reta) -> Embrace(reta, lise))\nforall x (Embrace(x, lura) -> Waking(x))\nforall x (Waking(x) and not Embrace(x, lise) -> Darn(x, lise))\n\nWaking(reta)\n\nEmbrace(reta, lura) and forall x (Embrace(x, lura) -> Waking(x)) -> therefore Waking(reta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The persis speck the nelia. The erina is not sacerdotal. The helaine speck the nelia. The nelia ensure the erina. If something speck the erina and the erina ensure the nelia then the nelia is sacerdotal. If something ensure the persis then the persis abet the nelia. If the helaine abet the nelia and the erina does not need the helaine then the helaine ensure the nelia. If something speck the nelia then the nelia ensure the persis. If something ensure the erina then it is raffish. If something is raffish and it does not like the persis then it abet the persis. The nelia does not like the persis.", "logic": "\nSpeck(persis, nelia)\nnot Sacerdotal(erina)\nSpeck(helaine, nelia)\nEnsure(nelia, erina)\nforall x (Speck(x, erina) and Ensure(erina, nelia) -> Sacerdotal(nelia))\nforall x (Ensure(x, persis) -> Abet(persis, nelia))\nAbet(helaine, nelia) and not Speck(erina, helaine) -> Ensure(helaine, nelia)\nforall x (Speck(x, nelia) -> Ensure(nelia, persis))\nforall x (Ensure(x, erina) -> Raffish(x))\nforall x (Raffish(x) and not Ensure(x, persis) -> Abet(x, persis))\n\nnot Ensure(nelia, persis)\n\nSpeck(persis, nelia) and forall x (Speck(x, nelia) -> Ensure(nelia, persis)) -> therefore Ensure(nelia, persis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The lynne snag the fey. The joey is not subnormal. The leighton snag the fey. The fey reclassify the joey. If something snag the joey and the joey reclassify the fey then the fey is subnormal. If something reclassify the lynne then the lynne sovietise the fey. If the leighton sovietise the fey and the joey does not need the leighton then the leighton reclassify the fey. If something snag the fey then the fey reclassify the lynne. If something reclassify the joey then it is campy. If something is campy and it does not like the lynne then it sovietise the lynne. The lynne sovietise the fey.", "logic": "\nSnag(lynne, fey)\nnot Subnormal(joey)\nSnag(leighton, fey)\nReclassify(fey, joey)\nforall x (Snag(x, joey) and Reclassify(joey, fey) -> Subnormal(fey))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, lynne) -> Sovietise(lynne, fey))\nSovietise(leighton, fey) and not Snag(joey, leighton) -> Reclassify(leighton, fey)\nforall x (Snag(x, fey) -> Reclassify(fey, lynne))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, joey) -> Campy(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) and not Reclassify(x, lynne) -> Sovietise(x, lynne))\n\nSovietise(lynne, fey)\n\nSnag(lynne, fey) and forall x (Snag(x, fey) -> Reclassify(fey, lynne)) -> therefore Reclassify(fey, lynne) Reclassify(fey, lynne) and forall x (Reclassify(x, lynne) -> Sovietise(lynne, fey)) -> therefore Sovietise(lynne, fey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The brandise scull the ophelie. The otes is not colonized. The dom scull the ophelie. The ophelie tenderize the otes. If something scull the otes and the otes tenderize the ophelie then the ophelie is colonized. If something tenderize the brandise then the brandise geminate the ophelie. If the dom geminate the ophelie and the otes does not need the dom then the dom tenderize the ophelie. If something scull the ophelie then the ophelie tenderize the brandise. If something tenderize the otes then it is diatonic. If something is diatonic and it does not like the brandise then it geminate the brandise. The brandise does not see the ophelie.", "logic": "\nScull(brandise, ophelie)\nnot Colonized(otes)\nScull(dom, ophelie)\nTenderize(ophelie, otes)\nforall x (Scull(x, otes) and Tenderize(otes, ophelie) -> Colonized(ophelie))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, brandise) -> Geminate(brandise, ophelie))\nGeminate(dom, ophelie) and not Scull(otes, dom) -> Tenderize(dom, ophelie)\nforall x (Scull(x, ophelie) -> Tenderize(ophelie, brandise))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, otes) -> Diatonic(x))\nforall x (Diatonic(x) and not Tenderize(x, brandise) -> Geminate(x, brandise))\n\nnot Geminate(brandise, ophelie)\n\nScull(brandise, ophelie) and forall x (Scull(x, ophelie) -> Tenderize(ophelie, brandise)) -> therefore Tenderize(ophelie, brandise) Tenderize(ophelie, brandise) and forall x (Tenderize(x, brandise) -> Geminate(brandise, ophelie)) -> therefore Geminate(brandise, ophelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The florance airmail the dorita. The lacy is not unfilled. The scarlett airmail the dorita. The dorita misprint the lacy. If something airmail the lacy and the lacy misprint the dorita then the dorita is unfilled. If something misprint the florance then the florance scollop the dorita. If the scarlett scollop the dorita and the lacy does not need the scarlett then the scarlett misprint the dorita. If something airmail the dorita then the dorita misprint the florance. If something misprint the lacy then it is boss. If something is boss and it does not like the florance then it scollop the florance. The scarlett does not like the dorita.", "logic": "\nAirmail(florance, dorita)\nnot Unfilled(lacy)\nAirmail(scarlett, dorita)\nMisprint(dorita, lacy)\nforall x (Airmail(x, lacy) and Misprint(lacy, dorita) -> Unfilled(dorita))\nforall x (Misprint(x, florance) -> Scollop(florance, dorita))\nScollop(scarlett, dorita) and not Airmail(lacy, scarlett) -> Misprint(scarlett, dorita)\nforall x (Airmail(x, dorita) -> Misprint(dorita, florance))\nforall x (Misprint(x, lacy) -> Boss(x))\nforall x (Boss(x) and not Misprint(x, florance) -> Scollop(x, florance))\n\nnot Misprint(scarlett, dorita)\n\nScollop(scarlett, dorita) and not Airmail(lacy, scarlett) -> Misprint(scarlett, dorita) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The joan tenderise the ulises. The corilla is not quadratic. The gusella tenderise the ulises. The ulises size the corilla. If something tenderise the corilla and the corilla size the ulises then the ulises is quadratic. If something size the joan then the joan moot the ulises. If the gusella moot the ulises and the corilla does not need the gusella then the gusella size the ulises. If something tenderise the ulises then the ulises size the joan. If something size the corilla then it is coiled. If something is coiled and it does not like the joan then it moot the joan. The gusella is coiled.", "logic": "\nTenderise(joan, ulises)\nnot Quadratic(corilla)\nTenderise(gusella, ulises)\nSize(ulises, corilla)\nforall x (Tenderise(x, corilla) and Size(corilla, ulises) -> Quadratic(ulises))\nforall x (Size(x, joan) -> Moot(joan, ulises))\nMoot(gusella, ulises) and not Tenderise(corilla, gusella) -> Size(gusella, ulises)\nforall x (Tenderise(x, ulises) -> Size(ulises, joan))\nforall x (Size(x, corilla) -> Coiled(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) and not Size(x, joan) -> Moot(x, joan))\n\nCoiled(gusella)\n\nforall x (Size(x, corilla) -> Coiled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The anjanette muster the kacey. The morissa is not atilt. The belita muster the kacey. The kacey slough the morissa. If something muster the morissa and the morissa slough the kacey then the kacey is atilt. If something slough the anjanette then the anjanette befool the kacey. If the belita befool the kacey and the morissa does not need the belita then the belita slough the kacey. If something muster the kacey then the kacey slough the anjanette. If something slough the morissa then it is boytrose. If something is boytrose and it does not like the anjanette then it befool the anjanette. The anjanette does not see the anjanette.", "logic": "\nMuster(anjanette, kacey)\nnot Atilt(morissa)\nMuster(belita, kacey)\nSlough(kacey, morissa)\nforall x (Muster(x, morissa) and Slough(morissa, kacey) -> Atilt(kacey))\nforall x (Slough(x, anjanette) -> Befool(anjanette, kacey))\nBefool(belita, kacey) and not Muster(morissa, belita) -> Slough(belita, kacey)\nforall x (Muster(x, kacey) -> Slough(kacey, anjanette))\nforall x (Slough(x, morissa) -> Boytrose(x))\nforall x (Boytrose(x) and not Slough(x, anjanette) -> Befool(x, anjanette))\n\nnot Befool(anjanette, anjanette)\n\nforall x (Boytrose(x) and not Slough(x, anjanette) -> Befool(x, anjanette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The mirna retaliate the marita. The quent is not illiterate. The valentina retaliate the marita. The marita mutate the quent. If something retaliate the quent and the quent mutate the marita then the marita is illiterate. If something mutate the mirna then the mirna glamour the marita. If the valentina glamour the marita and the quent does not need the valentina then the valentina mutate the marita. If something retaliate the marita then the marita mutate the mirna. If something mutate the quent then it is acicular. If something is acicular and it does not like the mirna then it glamour the mirna. The valentina is green.", "logic": "\nRetaliate(mirna, marita)\nnot Illiterate(quent)\nRetaliate(valentina, marita)\nMutate(marita, quent)\nforall x (Retaliate(x, quent) and Mutate(quent, marita) -> Illiterate(marita))\nforall x (Mutate(x, mirna) -> Glamour(mirna, marita))\nGlamour(valentina, marita) and not Retaliate(quent, valentina) -> Mutate(valentina, marita)\nforall x (Retaliate(x, marita) -> Mutate(marita, mirna))\nforall x (Mutate(x, quent) -> Acicular(x))\nforall x (Acicular(x) and not Mutate(x, mirna) -> Glamour(x, mirna))\n\nGreen(valentina)\n\nGreen(valentina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The mimi beat the sephira. The emelita is not smooth. The yehudi beat the sephira. The sephira deglaze the emelita. If something beat the emelita and the emelita deglaze the sephira then the sephira is smooth. If something deglaze the mimi then the mimi pigeonhole the sephira. If the yehudi pigeonhole the sephira and the emelita does not need the yehudi then the yehudi deglaze the sephira. If something beat the sephira then the sephira deglaze the mimi. If something deglaze the emelita then it is gregarious. If something is gregarious and it does not like the mimi then it pigeonhole the mimi. The mimi does not need the mimi.", "logic": "\nBeat(mimi, sephira)\nnot Smooth(emelita)\nBeat(yehudi, sephira)\nDeglaze(sephira, emelita)\nforall x (Beat(x, emelita) and Deglaze(emelita, sephira) -> Smooth(sephira))\nforall x (Deglaze(x, mimi) -> Pigeonhole(mimi, sephira))\nPigeonhole(yehudi, sephira) and not Beat(emelita, yehudi) -> Deglaze(yehudi, sephira)\nforall x (Beat(x, sephira) -> Deglaze(sephira, mimi))\nforall x (Deglaze(x, emelita) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Gregarious(x) and not Deglaze(x, mimi) -> Pigeonhole(x, mimi))\n\nnot Beat(mimi, mimi)\n\nnot Beat(mimi, mimi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The king lacerate the moya. The antonella is not actuating. The merlin lacerate the moya. The moya consecrate the antonella. If something lacerate the antonella and the antonella consecrate the moya then the moya is actuating. If something consecrate the king then the king entreat the moya. If the merlin entreat the moya and the antonella does not need the merlin then the merlin consecrate the moya. If something lacerate the moya then the moya consecrate the king. If something consecrate the antonella then it is dropsical. If something is dropsical and it does not like the king then it entreat the king. The king entreat the merlin.", "logic": "\nLacerate(king, moya)\nnot Actuating(antonella)\nLacerate(merlin, moya)\nConsecrate(moya, antonella)\nforall x (Lacerate(x, antonella) and Consecrate(antonella, moya) -> Actuating(moya))\nforall x (Consecrate(x, king) -> Entreat(king, moya))\nEntreat(merlin, moya) and not Lacerate(antonella, merlin) -> Consecrate(merlin, moya)\nforall x (Lacerate(x, moya) -> Consecrate(moya, king))\nforall x (Consecrate(x, antonella) -> Dropsical(x))\nforall x (Dropsical(x) and not Consecrate(x, king) -> Entreat(x, king))\n\nEntreat(king, merlin)\n\nEntreat(king, merlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-311"} {"premises": "The lotte illegalise the garnette. The garnette illegalise the lotte. If something alcoholize the garnette then the garnette is balzacian. If something illegalise the lotte then it alcoholize the garnette. If something is spongy and it alcoholize the lotte then it alcoholize the garnette. The lotte illegalise the garnette.", "logic": "\nIllegalise(lotte, garnette)\nIllegalise(garnette, lotte)\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, garnette) -> Balzacian(garnette))\nforall x (Illegalise(x, lotte) -> Alcoholize(x, garnette))\nforall x (Spongy(x) and Alcoholize(x, lotte) -> Alcoholize(x, garnette))\n\nIllegalise(lotte, garnette)\n\ntherefore Illegalise(lotte, garnette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The gwyneth foredate the sissy. The sissy foredate the gwyneth. If something fuddle the sissy then the sissy is adscripted. If something foredate the gwyneth then it fuddle the sissy. If something is pakistani and it fuddle the gwyneth then it fuddle the sissy. The gwyneth does not eat the sissy.", "logic": "\nForedate(gwyneth, sissy)\nForedate(sissy, gwyneth)\nforall x (Fuddle(x, sissy) -> Adscripted(sissy))\nforall x (Foredate(x, gwyneth) -> Fuddle(x, sissy))\nforall x (Pakistani(x) and Fuddle(x, gwyneth) -> Fuddle(x, sissy))\n\nnot Foredate(gwyneth, sissy)\n\ntherefore Foredate(gwyneth, sissy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The mellissa pyramid the trevor. The trevor pyramid the mellissa. If something memorize the trevor then the trevor is satyrical. If something pyramid the mellissa then it memorize the trevor. If something is uttered and it memorize the mellissa then it memorize the trevor. The trevor memorize the trevor.", "logic": "\nPyramid(mellissa, trevor)\nPyramid(trevor, mellissa)\nforall x (Memorize(x, trevor) -> Satyrical(trevor))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, mellissa) -> Memorize(x, trevor))\nforall x (Uttered(x) and Memorize(x, mellissa) -> Memorize(x, trevor))\n\nMemorize(trevor, trevor)\n\nPyramid(trevor, mellissa) and forall x (Pyramid(x, mellissa) -> Memorize(x, trevor)) -> therefore Memorize(trevor, trevor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The quintana recycle the briney. The briney recycle the quintana. If something stabilise the briney then the briney is membered. If something recycle the quintana then it stabilise the briney. If something is unstylish and it stabilise the quintana then it stabilise the briney. The briney does not visit the briney.", "logic": "\nRecycle(quintana, briney)\nRecycle(briney, quintana)\nforall x (Stabilise(x, briney) -> Membered(briney))\nforall x (Recycle(x, quintana) -> Stabilise(x, briney))\nforall x (Unstylish(x) and Stabilise(x, quintana) -> Stabilise(x, briney))\n\nnot Stabilise(briney, briney)\n\nRecycle(briney, quintana) and forall x (Recycle(x, quintana) -> Stabilise(x, briney)) -> therefore Stabilise(briney, briney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The glynda bestialise the irene. The irene bestialise the glynda. If something cannulate the irene then the irene is onetime. If something bestialise the glynda then it cannulate the irene. If something is monacan and it cannulate the glynda then it cannulate the irene. The irene is onetime.", "logic": "\nBestialise(glynda, irene)\nBestialise(irene, glynda)\nforall x (Cannulate(x, irene) -> Onetime(irene))\nforall x (Bestialise(x, glynda) -> Cannulate(x, irene))\nforall x (Monacan(x) and Cannulate(x, glynda) -> Cannulate(x, irene))\n\nOnetime(irene)\n\nBestialise(irene, glynda) and forall x (Bestialise(x, glynda) -> Cannulate(x, irene)) -> therefore Cannulate(irene, irene) Cannulate(irene, irene) and forall x (Cannulate(x, irene) -> Onetime(irene)) -> therefore Onetime(irene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The cicely excuse the aguste. The aguste excuse the cicely. If something centralize the aguste then the aguste is mindful. If something excuse the cicely then it centralize the aguste. If something is protozoan and it centralize the cicely then it centralize the aguste. The aguste is not mindful.", "logic": "\nExcuse(cicely, aguste)\nExcuse(aguste, cicely)\nforall x (Centralize(x, aguste) -> Mindful(aguste))\nforall x (Excuse(x, cicely) -> Centralize(x, aguste))\nforall x (Protozoan(x) and Centralize(x, cicely) -> Centralize(x, aguste))\n\nnot Mindful(aguste)\n\nExcuse(aguste, cicely) and forall x (Excuse(x, cicely) -> Centralize(x, aguste)) -> therefore Centralize(aguste, aguste) Centralize(aguste, aguste) and forall x (Centralize(x, aguste) -> Mindful(aguste)) -> therefore Mindful(aguste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The shepard approbate the marissa. The marissa approbate the shepard. If something snack the marissa then the marissa is babyish. If something approbate the shepard then it snack the marissa. If something is redbrick and it snack the shepard then it snack the marissa. The shepard does not visit the marissa.", "logic": "\nApprobate(shepard, marissa)\nApprobate(marissa, shepard)\nforall x (Snack(x, marissa) -> Babyish(marissa))\nforall x (Approbate(x, shepard) -> Snack(x, marissa))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and Snack(x, shepard) -> Snack(x, marissa))\n\nnot Snack(shepard, marissa)\n\nforall x (Approbate(x, shepard) -> Snack(x, marissa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The rosina melt the osmund. The osmund melt the rosina. If something upload the osmund then the osmund is albinistic. If something melt the rosina then it upload the osmund. If something is naif and it upload the rosina then it upload the osmund. The rosina upload the rosina.", "logic": "\nMelt(rosina, osmund)\nMelt(osmund, rosina)\nforall x (Upload(x, osmund) -> Albinistic(osmund))\nforall x (Melt(x, rosina) -> Upload(x, osmund))\nforall x (Naif(x) and Upload(x, rosina) -> Upload(x, osmund))\n\nUpload(rosina, rosina)\n\nUpload(rosina, rosina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The zitella square the aeriel. The aeriel square the zitella. If something hate the aeriel then the aeriel is romanian. If something square the zitella then it hate the aeriel. If something is apodeictic and it hate the zitella then it hate the aeriel. The aeriel is not nice.", "logic": "\nSquare(zitella, aeriel)\nSquare(aeriel, zitella)\nforall x (Hate(x, aeriel) -> Romanian(aeriel))\nforall x (Square(x, zitella) -> Hate(x, aeriel))\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) and Hate(x, zitella) -> Hate(x, aeriel))\n\nnot Nice(aeriel)\n\nnot Nice(aeriel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The alida mudwrestle the camel. The camel mudwrestle the alida. If something recline the camel then the camel is vexed. If something mudwrestle the alida then it recline the camel. If something is begrimed and it recline the alida then it recline the camel. The alida is vexed.", "logic": "\nMudwrestle(alida, camel)\nMudwrestle(camel, alida)\nforall x (Recline(x, camel) -> Vexed(camel))\nforall x (Mudwrestle(x, alida) -> Recline(x, camel))\nforall x (Begrimed(x) and Recline(x, alida) -> Recline(x, camel))\n\nVexed(alida)\n\nVexed(alida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The allianora detach the barbabas. The barbabas detach the allianora. If something backhand the barbabas then the barbabas is unequalled. If something detach the allianora then it backhand the barbabas. If something is riparian and it backhand the allianora then it backhand the barbabas. The barbabas is not rough.", "logic": "\nDetach(allianora, barbabas)\nDetach(barbabas, allianora)\nforall x (Backhand(x, barbabas) -> Unequalled(barbabas))\nforall x (Detach(x, allianora) -> Backhand(x, barbabas))\nforall x (Riparian(x) and Backhand(x, allianora) -> Backhand(x, barbabas))\n\nnot Rough(barbabas)\n\nnot Rough(barbabas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The haskel munch the zedekiah. The zedekiah munch the haskel. If something glare the zedekiah then the zedekiah is choice. If something munch the haskel then it glare the zedekiah. If something is isolable and it glare the haskel then it glare the zedekiah. The zedekiah is isolable.", "logic": "\nMunch(haskel, zedekiah)\nMunch(zedekiah, haskel)\nforall x (Glare(x, zedekiah) -> Choice(zedekiah))\nforall x (Munch(x, haskel) -> Glare(x, zedekiah))\nforall x (Isolable(x) and Glare(x, haskel) -> Glare(x, zedekiah))\n\nIsolable(zedekiah)\n\nIsolable(zedekiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "Morten is certified. Morten is farthest. Morten is bankrupt. Morten is cheapjack. Briney is unbooked. Briney is farthest. Briney is eastern. Green, certified people are farthest. Big people are cheapjack. White, bankrupt people are sterile. If someone is cheapjack then they are eastern. If someone is eastern and farthest then they are certified. All eastern, sterile people are bankrupt. Morten is farthest.", "logic": "\nCertified(morten)\nFarthest(morten)\nBankrupt(morten)\nCheapjack(morten)\nUnbooked(briney)\nFarthest(briney)\nEastern(briney)\nforall x (Sterile(x) and Certified(x) -> Farthest(x))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) -> Cheapjack(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) and Bankrupt(x) -> Sterile(x))\nforall x (Cheapjack(x) -> Eastern(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) and Farthest(x) -> Certified(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) and Sterile(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\n\nFarthest(morten)\n\ntherefore Farthest(morten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "Noble is ahorseback. Noble is adaxial. Noble is grooved. Noble is sanious. Rad is ruined. Rad is adaxial. Rad is intrastate. Green, ahorseback people are adaxial. Big people are sanious. White, grooved people are bacchic. If someone is sanious then they are intrastate. If someone is intrastate and adaxial then they are ahorseback. All intrastate, bacchic people are grooved. Rad is not intrastate.", "logic": "\nAhorseback(noble)\nAdaxial(noble)\nGrooved(noble)\nSanious(noble)\nRuined(rad)\nAdaxial(rad)\nIntrastate(rad)\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Ahorseback(x) -> Adaxial(x))\nforall x (Ruined(x) -> Sanious(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) and Grooved(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Sanious(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) and Adaxial(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) and Bacchic(x) -> Grooved(x))\n\nnot Intrastate(rad)\n\ntherefore Intrastate(rad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "Graig is fistulous. Graig is expendable. Graig is unfunded. Graig is cambrian. Harrold is anonymous. Harrold is expendable. Harrold is plutonic. Green, fistulous people are expendable. Big people are cambrian. White, unfunded people are lowermost. If someone is cambrian then they are plutonic. If someone is plutonic and expendable then they are fistulous. All plutonic, lowermost people are unfunded. Harrold is fistulous.", "logic": "\nFistulous(graig)\nExpendable(graig)\nUnfunded(graig)\nCambrian(graig)\nAnonymous(harrold)\nExpendable(harrold)\nPlutonic(harrold)\nforall x (Lowermost(x) and Fistulous(x) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Unfunded(x) -> Lowermost(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Expendable(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Lowermost(x) -> Unfunded(x))\n\nFistulous(harrold)\n\nPlutonic(harrold) and Expendable(harrold) and forall x (Plutonic(x) and Expendable(x) -> Fistulous(x)) -> therefore Fistulous(harrold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "Kelvin is judicial. Kelvin is corrected. Kelvin is immunised. Kelvin is unchanged. Rachel is scrubby. Rachel is corrected. Rachel is protanopic. Green, judicial people are corrected. Big people are unchanged. White, immunised people are crustose. If someone is unchanged then they are protanopic. If someone is protanopic and corrected then they are judicial. All protanopic, crustose people are immunised. Rachel is not unchanged.", "logic": "\nJudicial(kelvin)\nCorrected(kelvin)\nImmunised(kelvin)\nUnchanged(kelvin)\nScrubby(rachel)\nCorrected(rachel)\nProtanopic(rachel)\nforall x (Crustose(x) and Judicial(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Protanopic(x) and Immunised(x) -> Crustose(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) -> Protanopic(x))\nforall x (Protanopic(x) and Corrected(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Protanopic(x) and Crustose(x) -> Immunised(x))\n\nnot Unchanged(rachel)\n\nScrubby(rachel) and forall x (Scrubby(x) -> Unchanged(x)) -> therefore Unchanged(rachel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "Ruddie is syndetic. Ruddie is ulnar. Ruddie is igneous. Ruddie is rank. Stevie is magnetized. Stevie is ulnar. Stevie is unlimited. Green, syndetic people are ulnar. Big people are rank. White, igneous people are footling. If someone is rank then they are unlimited. If someone is unlimited and ulnar then they are syndetic. All unlimited, footling people are igneous. Ruddie is footling.", "logic": "\nSyndetic(ruddie)\nUlnar(ruddie)\nIgneous(ruddie)\nRank(ruddie)\nMagnetized(stevie)\nUlnar(stevie)\nUnlimited(stevie)\nforall x (Footling(x) and Syndetic(x) -> Ulnar(x))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Igneous(x) -> Footling(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Ulnar(x) -> Syndetic(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Footling(x) -> Igneous(x))\n\nFootling(ruddie)\n\nRank(ruddie) and forall x (Rank(x) -> Unlimited(x)) -> therefore Unlimited(ruddie) Unlimited(ruddie) and Igneous(ruddie) and forall x (Unlimited(x) and Igneous(x) -> Footling(x)) -> therefore Footling(ruddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "Vaughn is piebald. Vaughn is desirous. Vaughn is thermionic. Vaughn is unpierced. Ethelda is moist. Ethelda is desirous. Ethelda is sheared. Green, piebald people are desirous. Big people are unpierced. White, thermionic people are appendant. If someone is unpierced then they are sheared. If someone is sheared and desirous then they are piebald. All sheared, appendant people are thermionic. Vaughn is not appendant.", "logic": "\nPiebald(vaughn)\nDesirous(vaughn)\nThermionic(vaughn)\nUnpierced(vaughn)\nMoist(ethelda)\nDesirous(ethelda)\nSheared(ethelda)\nforall x (Appendant(x) and Piebald(x) -> Desirous(x))\nforall x (Moist(x) -> Unpierced(x))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and Thermionic(x) -> Appendant(x))\nforall x (Unpierced(x) -> Sheared(x))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and Desirous(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and Appendant(x) -> Thermionic(x))\n\nnot Appendant(vaughn)\n\nUnpierced(vaughn) and forall x (Unpierced(x) -> Sheared(x)) -> therefore Sheared(vaughn) Sheared(vaughn) and Thermionic(vaughn) and forall x (Sheared(x) and Thermionic(x) -> Appendant(x)) -> therefore Appendant(vaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "Marris is autoicous. Marris is variolic. Marris is primaeval. Marris is estuarial. Vivien is hybrid. Vivien is variolic. Vivien is mutinous. Green, autoicous people are variolic. Big people are estuarial. White, primaeval people are homemade. If someone is estuarial then they are mutinous. If someone is mutinous and variolic then they are autoicous. All mutinous, homemade people are primaeval. Vivien is not homemade.", "logic": "\nAutoicous(marris)\nVariolic(marris)\nPrimaeval(marris)\nEstuarial(marris)\nHybrid(vivien)\nVariolic(vivien)\nMutinous(vivien)\nforall x (Homemade(x) and Autoicous(x) -> Variolic(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) -> Estuarial(x))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Primaeval(x) -> Homemade(x))\nforall x (Estuarial(x) -> Mutinous(x))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Variolic(x) -> Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Homemade(x) -> Primaeval(x))\n\nnot Homemade(vivien)\n\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Primaeval(x) -> Homemade(x)) <- forall x (Mutinous(x) and Homemade(x) -> Primaeval(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "Rhona is even. Rhona is dominated. Rhona is cluttered. Rhona is unmedical. Hiram is juridic. Hiram is dominated. Hiram is individual. Green, even people are dominated. Big people are unmedical. White, cluttered people are iatrogenic. If someone is unmedical then they are individual. If someone is individual and dominated then they are even. All individual, iatrogenic people are cluttered. Hiram is cluttered.", "logic": "\nEven(rhona)\nDominated(rhona)\nCluttered(rhona)\nUnmedical(rhona)\nJuridic(hiram)\nDominated(hiram)\nIndividual(hiram)\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) and Even(x) -> Dominated(x))\nforall x (Juridic(x) -> Unmedical(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) and Cluttered(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) -> Individual(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) and Dominated(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) and Iatrogenic(x) -> Cluttered(x))\n\nCluttered(hiram)\n\nforall x (Individual(x) and Iatrogenic(x) -> Cluttered(x)) <- forall x (Individual(x) and Cluttered(x) -> Iatrogenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1609"} {"premises": "The ardra is not adducting. The roxana literalise the ardra. The cybelle is not burundi. The elsey literalise the cybelle. If someone literalise the cybelle then they are biotic. If someone literalise the ardra then the ardra does not eat the cybelle. Green people are not emerging. If someone is emerging and they eat the roxana then they eat the ardra. If someone is emerging and they do not visit the ardra then the ardra is emerging. Big people are not adducting. If the roxana defect the ardra then the ardra literalise the roxana. If someone literalise the roxana and the roxana is not emerging then they do not visit the elsey. The ardra is not adducting.", "logic": "\nnot Adducting(ardra)\nLiteralise(roxana, ardra)\nnot Burundi(cybelle)\nLiteralise(elsey, cybelle)\nforall x (Literalise(x, cybelle) -> Biotic(x))\nforall x (Literalise(x, ardra) -> not Live(ardra, cybelle))\nforall x (Adducting(x) -> not Emerging(x))\nforall x (Emerging(x) and Live(x, roxana) -> Live(x, ardra))\nforall x (Emerging(x) and not Defect(x, ardra) -> Emerging(ardra))\nforall x (Biotic(x) -> not Adducting(x))\nDefect(roxana, ardra) -> Literalise(ardra, roxana)\nforall x (Literalise(x, roxana) and not Emerging(roxana) -> not Defect(x, elsey))\n\nnot Adducting(ardra)\n\ntherefore not Adducting(ardra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The jerrome is not deadlocked. The hercule hoard the jerrome. The evy is not mantic. The bliss hoard the evy. If someone hoard the evy then they are broad. If someone hoard the jerrome then the jerrome does not eat the evy. Green people are not unbrushed. If someone is unbrushed and they eat the hercule then they eat the jerrome. If someone is unbrushed and they do not visit the jerrome then the jerrome is unbrushed. Big people are not deadlocked. If the hercule wamble the jerrome then the jerrome hoard the hercule. If someone hoard the hercule and the hercule is not unbrushed then they do not visit the bliss. The bliss does not see the evy.", "logic": "\nnot Deadlocked(jerrome)\nHoard(hercule, jerrome)\nnot Mantic(evy)\nHoard(bliss, evy)\nforall x (Hoard(x, evy) -> Broad(x))\nforall x (Hoard(x, jerrome) -> not Trail(jerrome, evy))\nforall x (Deadlocked(x) -> not Unbrushed(x))\nforall x (Unbrushed(x) and Trail(x, hercule) -> Trail(x, jerrome))\nforall x (Unbrushed(x) and not Wamble(x, jerrome) -> Unbrushed(jerrome))\nforall x (Broad(x) -> not Deadlocked(x))\nWamble(hercule, jerrome) -> Hoard(jerrome, hercule)\nforall x (Hoard(x, hercule) and not Unbrushed(hercule) -> not Wamble(x, bliss))\n\nnot Hoard(bliss, evy)\n\ntherefore Hoard(bliss, evy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The karil is not erotic. The cris appertain the karil. The sherill is not omani. The dana appertain the sherill. If someone appertain the sherill then they are obligatory. If someone appertain the karil then the karil does not eat the sherill. Green people are not uncommon. If someone is uncommon and they eat the cris then they eat the karil. If someone is uncommon and they do not visit the karil then the karil is uncommon. Big people are not erotic. If the cris slink the karil then the karil appertain the cris. If someone appertain the cris and the cris is not uncommon then they do not visit the dana. The dana is obligatory.", "logic": "\nnot Erotic(karil)\nAppertain(cris, karil)\nnot Omani(sherill)\nAppertain(dana, sherill)\nforall x (Appertain(x, sherill) -> Obligatory(x))\nforall x (Appertain(x, karil) -> not Liquidize(karil, sherill))\nforall x (Erotic(x) -> not Uncommon(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and Liquidize(x, cris) -> Liquidize(x, karil))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and not Slink(x, karil) -> Uncommon(karil))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) -> not Erotic(x))\nSlink(cris, karil) -> Appertain(karil, cris)\nforall x (Appertain(x, cris) and not Uncommon(cris) -> not Slink(x, dana))\n\nObligatory(dana)\n\nAppertain(dana, sherill) and forall x (Appertain(x, sherill) -> Obligatory(x)) -> therefore Obligatory(dana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The dodi is not automated. The genny stoop the dodi. The lew is not waterproof. The melessa stoop the lew. If someone stoop the lew then they are presbyopic. If someone stoop the dodi then the dodi does not eat the lew. Green people are not eupneic. If someone is eupneic and they eat the genny then they eat the dodi. If someone is eupneic and they do not visit the dodi then the dodi is eupneic. Big people are not automated. If the genny galvanise the dodi then the dodi stoop the genny. If someone stoop the genny and the genny is not eupneic then they do not visit the melessa. The dodi trespass the lew.", "logic": "\nnot Automated(dodi)\nStoop(genny, dodi)\nnot Waterproof(lew)\nStoop(melessa, lew)\nforall x (Stoop(x, lew) -> Presbyopic(x))\nforall x (Stoop(x, dodi) -> not Trespass(dodi, lew))\nforall x (Automated(x) -> not Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Eupneic(x) and Trespass(x, genny) -> Trespass(x, dodi))\nforall x (Eupneic(x) and not Galvanise(x, dodi) -> Eupneic(dodi))\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) -> not Automated(x))\nGalvanise(genny, dodi) -> Stoop(dodi, genny)\nforall x (Stoop(x, genny) and not Eupneic(genny) -> not Galvanise(x, melessa))\n\nTrespass(dodi, lew)\n\nStoop(genny, dodi) and forall x (Stoop(x, dodi) -> not Trespass(dodi, lew)) -> therefore not Trespass(dodi, lew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The dinny is not remaining. The noami hack the dinny. The latisha is not strained. The vernen hack the latisha. If someone hack the latisha then they are basidial. If someone hack the dinny then the dinny does not eat the latisha. Green people are not inmost. If someone is inmost and they eat the noami then they eat the dinny. If someone is inmost and they do not visit the dinny then the dinny is inmost. Big people are not remaining. If the noami bewilder the dinny then the dinny hack the noami. If someone hack the noami and the noami is not inmost then they do not visit the vernen. The vernen is not remaining.", "logic": "\nnot Remaining(dinny)\nHack(noami, dinny)\nnot Strained(latisha)\nHack(vernen, latisha)\nforall x (Hack(x, latisha) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Hack(x, dinny) -> not Inflate(dinny, latisha))\nforall x (Remaining(x) -> not Inmost(x))\nforall x (Inmost(x) and Inflate(x, noami) -> Inflate(x, dinny))\nforall x (Inmost(x) and not Bewilder(x, dinny) -> Inmost(dinny))\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> not Remaining(x))\nBewilder(noami, dinny) -> Hack(dinny, noami)\nforall x (Hack(x, noami) and not Inmost(noami) -> not Bewilder(x, vernen))\n\nnot Remaining(vernen)\n\nHack(vernen, latisha) and forall x (Hack(x, latisha) -> Basidial(x)) -> therefore Basidial(vernen) Basidial(vernen) and forall x (Basidial(x) -> not Remaining(x)) -> therefore not Remaining(vernen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The julissa is not backless. The morgana accurse the julissa. The sissy is not darling. The kathryn accurse the sissy. If someone accurse the sissy then they are pedate. If someone accurse the julissa then the julissa does not eat the sissy. Green people are not raining. If someone is raining and they eat the morgana then they eat the julissa. If someone is raining and they do not visit the julissa then the julissa is raining. Big people are not backless. If the morgana undrape the julissa then the julissa accurse the morgana. If someone accurse the morgana and the morgana is not raining then they do not visit the kathryn. The kathryn is backless.", "logic": "\nnot Backless(julissa)\nAccurse(morgana, julissa)\nnot Darling(sissy)\nAccurse(kathryn, sissy)\nforall x (Accurse(x, sissy) -> Pedate(x))\nforall x (Accurse(x, julissa) -> not Tailor(julissa, sissy))\nforall x (Backless(x) -> not Raining(x))\nforall x (Raining(x) and Tailor(x, morgana) -> Tailor(x, julissa))\nforall x (Raining(x) and not Undrape(x, julissa) -> Raining(julissa))\nforall x (Pedate(x) -> not Backless(x))\nUndrape(morgana, julissa) -> Accurse(julissa, morgana)\nforall x (Accurse(x, morgana) and not Raining(morgana) -> not Undrape(x, kathryn))\n\nBackless(kathryn)\n\nAccurse(kathryn, sissy) and forall x (Accurse(x, sissy) -> Pedate(x)) -> therefore Pedate(kathryn) Pedate(kathryn) and forall x (Pedate(x) -> not Backless(x)) -> therefore not Backless(kathryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The riane is not knotty. The stanford sorrow the riane. The shurlock is not flickering. The rafaelia sorrow the shurlock. If someone sorrow the shurlock then they are extirpable. If someone sorrow the riane then the riane does not eat the shurlock. Green people are not discharged. If someone is discharged and they eat the stanford then they eat the riane. If someone is discharged and they do not visit the riane then the riane is discharged. Big people are not knotty. If the stanford hydrolise the riane then the riane sorrow the stanford. If someone sorrow the stanford and the stanford is not discharged then they do not visit the rafaelia. The riane is not extirpable.", "logic": "\nnot Knotty(riane)\nSorrow(stanford, riane)\nnot Flickering(shurlock)\nSorrow(rafaelia, shurlock)\nforall x (Sorrow(x, shurlock) -> Extirpable(x))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, riane) -> not Rack(riane, shurlock))\nforall x (Knotty(x) -> not Discharged(x))\nforall x (Discharged(x) and Rack(x, stanford) -> Rack(x, riane))\nforall x (Discharged(x) and not Hydrolise(x, riane) -> Discharged(riane))\nforall x (Extirpable(x) -> not Knotty(x))\nHydrolise(stanford, riane) -> Sorrow(riane, stanford)\nforall x (Sorrow(x, stanford) and not Discharged(stanford) -> not Hydrolise(x, rafaelia))\n\nnot Extirpable(riane)\n\nforall x (Sorrow(x, shurlock) -> Extirpable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The myna is not bully. The bobbette instance the myna. The dee is not decayable. The melodee instance the dee. If someone instance the dee then they are painless. If someone instance the myna then the myna does not eat the dee. Green people are not allegoric. If someone is allegoric and they eat the bobbette then they eat the myna. If someone is allegoric and they do not visit the myna then the myna is allegoric. Big people are not bully. If the bobbette floss the myna then the myna instance the bobbette. If someone instance the bobbette and the bobbette is not allegoric then they do not visit the melodee. The myna instance the bobbette.", "logic": "\nnot Bully(myna)\nInstance(bobbette, myna)\nnot Decayable(dee)\nInstance(melodee, dee)\nforall x (Instance(x, dee) -> Painless(x))\nforall x (Instance(x, myna) -> not Concenter(myna, dee))\nforall x (Bully(x) -> not Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Allegoric(x) and Concenter(x, bobbette) -> Concenter(x, myna))\nforall x (Allegoric(x) and not Floss(x, myna) -> Allegoric(myna))\nforall x (Painless(x) -> not Bully(x))\nFloss(bobbette, myna) -> Instance(myna, bobbette)\nforall x (Instance(x, bobbette) and not Allegoric(bobbette) -> not Floss(x, melodee))\n\nInstance(myna, bobbette)\n\nFloss(bobbette, myna) -> Instance(myna, bobbette) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The annalyse is not engaging. The jolie essay the annalyse. The jess is not bedrid. The bengt essay the jess. If someone essay the jess then they are turkic. If someone essay the annalyse then the annalyse does not eat the jess. Green people are not freckled. If someone is freckled and they eat the jolie then they eat the annalyse. If someone is freckled and they do not visit the annalyse then the annalyse is freckled. Big people are not engaging. If the jolie childproof the annalyse then the annalyse essay the jolie. If someone essay the jolie and the jolie is not freckled then they do not visit the bengt. The annalyse is not freckled.", "logic": "\nnot Engaging(annalyse)\nEssay(jolie, annalyse)\nnot Bedrid(jess)\nEssay(bengt, jess)\nforall x (Essay(x, jess) -> Turkic(x))\nforall x (Essay(x, annalyse) -> not Stripe(annalyse, jess))\nforall x (Engaging(x) -> not Freckled(x))\nforall x (Freckled(x) and Stripe(x, jolie) -> Stripe(x, annalyse))\nforall x (Freckled(x) and not Childproof(x, annalyse) -> Freckled(annalyse))\nforall x (Turkic(x) -> not Engaging(x))\nChildproof(jolie, annalyse) -> Essay(annalyse, jolie)\nforall x (Essay(x, jolie) and not Freckled(jolie) -> not Childproof(x, bengt))\n\nnot Freckled(annalyse)\n\nforall x (Freckled(x) and not Childproof(x, annalyse) -> Freckled(annalyse)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The mabel is not ankylotic. The robina sober the mabel. The sashenka is not epicurean. The peggie sober the sashenka. If someone sober the sashenka then they are treed. If someone sober the mabel then the mabel does not eat the sashenka. Green people are not hokey. If someone is hokey and they eat the robina then they eat the mabel. If someone is hokey and they do not visit the mabel then the mabel is hokey. Big people are not ankylotic. If the robina tenure the mabel then the mabel sober the robina. If someone sober the robina and the robina is not hokey then they do not visit the peggie. The peggie stylise the robina.", "logic": "\nnot Ankylotic(mabel)\nSober(robina, mabel)\nnot Epicurean(sashenka)\nSober(peggie, sashenka)\nforall x (Sober(x, sashenka) -> Treed(x))\nforall x (Sober(x, mabel) -> not Stylise(mabel, sashenka))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> not Hokey(x))\nforall x (Hokey(x) and Stylise(x, robina) -> Stylise(x, mabel))\nforall x (Hokey(x) and not Tenure(x, mabel) -> Hokey(mabel))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> not Ankylotic(x))\nTenure(robina, mabel) -> Sober(mabel, robina)\nforall x (Sober(x, robina) and not Hokey(robina) -> not Tenure(x, peggie))\n\nStylise(peggie, robina)\n\nStylise(peggie, robina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The tremaine is not semiformal. The ekaterina racketeer the tremaine. The charyl is not modeled. The evelina racketeer the charyl. If someone racketeer the charyl then they are feathered. If someone racketeer the tremaine then the tremaine does not eat the charyl. Green people are not biologic. If someone is biologic and they eat the ekaterina then they eat the tremaine. If someone is biologic and they do not visit the tremaine then the tremaine is biologic. Big people are not semiformal. If the ekaterina surmise the tremaine then the tremaine racketeer the ekaterina. If someone racketeer the ekaterina and the ekaterina is not biologic then they do not visit the evelina. The charyl is not biologic.", "logic": "\nnot Semiformal(tremaine)\nRacketeer(ekaterina, tremaine)\nnot Modeled(charyl)\nRacketeer(evelina, charyl)\nforall x (Racketeer(x, charyl) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Racketeer(x, tremaine) -> not Prehend(tremaine, charyl))\nforall x (Semiformal(x) -> not Biologic(x))\nforall x (Biologic(x) and Prehend(x, ekaterina) -> Prehend(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Biologic(x) and not Surmise(x, tremaine) -> Biologic(tremaine))\nforall x (Feathered(x) -> not Semiformal(x))\nSurmise(ekaterina, tremaine) -> Racketeer(tremaine, ekaterina)\nforall x (Racketeer(x, ekaterina) and not Biologic(ekaterina) -> not Surmise(x, evelina))\n\nnot Biologic(charyl)\n\nnot Biologic(charyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "The tristan is not delightful. The marianna deactivate the tristan. The fernando is not amphibian. The zandra deactivate the fernando. If someone deactivate the fernando then they are geodetic. If someone deactivate the tristan then the tristan does not eat the fernando. Green people are not striking. If someone is striking and they eat the marianna then they eat the tristan. If someone is striking and they do not visit the tristan then the tristan is striking. Big people are not delightful. If the marianna pollard the tristan then the tristan deactivate the marianna. If someone deactivate the marianna and the marianna is not striking then they do not visit the zandra. The fernando deactivate the fernando.", "logic": "\nnot Delightful(tristan)\nDeactivate(marianna, tristan)\nnot Amphibian(fernando)\nDeactivate(zandra, fernando)\nforall x (Deactivate(x, fernando) -> Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, tristan) -> not Encipher(tristan, fernando))\nforall x (Delightful(x) -> not Striking(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) and Encipher(x, marianna) -> Encipher(x, tristan))\nforall x (Striking(x) and not Pollard(x, tristan) -> Striking(tristan))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> not Delightful(x))\nPollard(marianna, tristan) -> Deactivate(tristan, marianna)\nforall x (Deactivate(x, marianna) and not Striking(marianna) -> not Pollard(x, zandra))\n\nDeactivate(fernando, fernando)\n\nDeactivate(fernando, fernando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2051"} {"premises": "Else is plethoric. Leonore is yellowed. Audre is peopled. If Leonore is styptic then Leonore is peopled. Blue things are jangling. If Else is plethoric then Else is styptic. If Audre is unemphatic then Audre is plethoric. White, plethoric things are jangling. If something is yellowed then it is plethoric. Audre is peopled.", "logic": "\nPlethoric(else)\nYellowed(leonore)\nPeopled(audre)\nStyptic(leonore) -> Peopled(leonore)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Jangling(x))\nPlethoric(else) -> Styptic(else)\nUnemphatic(audre) -> Plethoric(audre)\nforall x (Immune(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Jangling(x))\nforall x (Yellowed(x) -> Plethoric(x))\n\nPeopled(audre)\n\ntherefore Peopled(audre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Katina is fictitious. Ira is hueless. Caprice is correlate. If Ira is bisulcate then Ira is correlate. Blue things are countable. If Katina is fictitious then Katina is bisulcate. If Caprice is heady then Caprice is fictitious. White, fictitious things are countable. If something is hueless then it is fictitious. Ira is not hueless.", "logic": "\nFictitious(katina)\nHueless(ira)\nCorrelate(caprice)\nBisulcate(ira) -> Correlate(ira)\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) -> Countable(x))\nFictitious(katina) -> Bisulcate(katina)\nHeady(caprice) -> Fictitious(caprice)\nforall x (Niggling(x) and Fictitious(x) -> Countable(x))\nforall x (Hueless(x) -> Fictitious(x))\n\nnot Hueless(ira)\n\ntherefore Hueless(ira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Joanne is discerning. Clovis is zillion. Adey is satiny. If Clovis is courteous then Clovis is satiny. Blue things are coagulable. If Joanne is discerning then Joanne is courteous. If Adey is uncarpeted then Adey is discerning. White, discerning things are coagulable. If something is zillion then it is discerning. Clovis is discerning.", "logic": "\nDiscerning(joanne)\nZillion(clovis)\nSatiny(adey)\nCourteous(clovis) -> Satiny(clovis)\nforall x (Courteous(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nDiscerning(joanne) -> Courteous(joanne)\nUncarpeted(adey) -> Discerning(adey)\nforall x (Clathrate(x) and Discerning(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nforall x (Zillion(x) -> Discerning(x))\n\nDiscerning(clovis)\n\nZillion(clovis) and forall x (Zillion(x) -> Discerning(x)) -> therefore Discerning(clovis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Mikel is pouched. Shandra is ceaseless. Arlinda is ecdemic. If Shandra is moralistic then Shandra is ecdemic. Blue things are ungraded. If Mikel is pouched then Mikel is moralistic. If Arlinda is bicipital then Arlinda is pouched. White, pouched things are ungraded. If something is ceaseless then it is pouched. Mikel is not moralistic.", "logic": "\nPouched(mikel)\nCeaseless(shandra)\nEcdemic(arlinda)\nMoralistic(shandra) -> Ecdemic(shandra)\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Ungraded(x))\nPouched(mikel) -> Moralistic(mikel)\nBicipital(arlinda) -> Pouched(arlinda)\nforall x (Azido(x) and Pouched(x) -> Ungraded(x))\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) -> Pouched(x))\n\nnot Moralistic(mikel)\n\nPouched(mikel) and Pouched(mikel) -> Moralistic(mikel) -> therefore Moralistic(mikel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Ben is haptic. Bert is midget. Ardelis is lavender. If Bert is ceremonial then Bert is lavender. Blue things are cosmetic. If Ben is haptic then Ben is ceremonial. If Ardelis is arthralgic then Ardelis is haptic. White, haptic things are cosmetic. If something is midget then it is haptic. Ben is cosmetic.", "logic": "\nHaptic(ben)\nMidget(bert)\nLavender(ardelis)\nCeremonial(bert) -> Lavender(bert)\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nHaptic(ben) -> Ceremonial(ben)\nArthralgic(ardelis) -> Haptic(ardelis)\nforall x (Velvet(x) and Haptic(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) -> Haptic(x))\n\nCosmetic(ben)\n\nHaptic(ben) and Haptic(ben) -> Ceremonial(ben) -> therefore Ceremonial(ben) Ceremonial(ben) and forall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Cosmetic(x)) -> therefore Cosmetic(ben)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Tasha is fascistic. Meggi is montane. Yacov is superlunar. If Meggi is baked then Meggi is superlunar. Blue things are sinuous. If Tasha is fascistic then Tasha is baked. If Yacov is insincere then Yacov is fascistic. White, fascistic things are sinuous. If something is montane then it is fascistic. Tasha is not sinuous.", "logic": "\nFascistic(tasha)\nMontane(meggi)\nSuperlunar(yacov)\nBaked(meggi) -> Superlunar(meggi)\nforall x (Baked(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nFascistic(tasha) -> Baked(tasha)\nInsincere(yacov) -> Fascistic(yacov)\nforall x (Slithery(x) and Fascistic(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nforall x (Montane(x) -> Fascistic(x))\n\nnot Sinuous(tasha)\n\nFascistic(tasha) and Fascistic(tasha) -> Baked(tasha) -> therefore Baked(tasha) Baked(tasha) and forall x (Baked(x) -> Sinuous(x)) -> therefore Sinuous(tasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Alina is amphibian. Myrtle is pureblood. Bill is banal. If Myrtle is acetose then Myrtle is banal. Blue things are syntactic. If Alina is amphibian then Alina is acetose. If Bill is undersize then Bill is amphibian. White, amphibian things are syntactic. If something is pureblood then it is amphibian. Bill is not amphibian.", "logic": "\nAmphibian(alina)\nPureblood(myrtle)\nBanal(bill)\nAcetose(myrtle) -> Banal(myrtle)\nforall x (Acetose(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nAmphibian(alina) -> Acetose(alina)\nUndersize(bill) -> Amphibian(bill)\nforall x (Checked(x) and Amphibian(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Pureblood(x) -> Amphibian(x))\n\nnot Amphibian(bill)\n\nUndersize(bill) -> Amphibian(bill) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Idaline is outward. Spiros is furthest. Ambrosius is awless. If Spiros is tenderised then Spiros is awless. Blue things are blustering. If Idaline is outward then Idaline is tenderised. If Ambrosius is ophthalmic then Ambrosius is outward. White, outward things are blustering. If something is furthest then it is outward. Spiros is awless.", "logic": "\nOutward(idaline)\nFurthest(spiros)\nAwless(ambrosius)\nTenderised(spiros) -> Awless(spiros)\nforall x (Tenderised(x) -> Blustering(x))\nOutward(idaline) -> Tenderised(idaline)\nOphthalmic(ambrosius) -> Outward(ambrosius)\nforall x (Elegant(x) and Outward(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) -> Outward(x))\n\nAwless(spiros)\n\nTenderised(spiros) -> Awless(spiros) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Harley is fancy. Jemie is solvable. Lizabeth is arcuate. If Jemie is glottal then Jemie is arcuate. Blue things are bended. If Harley is fancy then Harley is glottal. If Lizabeth is right then Lizabeth is fancy. White, fancy things are bended. If something is solvable then it is fancy. Lizabeth is not bended.", "logic": "\nFancy(harley)\nSolvable(jemie)\nArcuate(lizabeth)\nGlottal(jemie) -> Arcuate(jemie)\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Bended(x))\nFancy(harley) -> Glottal(harley)\nRight(lizabeth) -> Fancy(lizabeth)\nforall x (Continuing(x) and Fancy(x) -> Bended(x))\nforall x (Solvable(x) -> Fancy(x))\n\nnot Bended(lizabeth)\n\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Bended(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Lorelei is penal. Shea is preferable. Salmon is implike. If Shea is ambitious then Shea is implike. Blue things are overfull. If Lorelei is penal then Lorelei is ambitious. If Salmon is accessary then Salmon is penal. White, penal things are overfull. If something is preferable then it is penal. Salmon is ambitious.", "logic": "\nPenal(lorelei)\nPreferable(shea)\nImplike(salmon)\nAmbitious(shea) -> Implike(shea)\nforall x (Ambitious(x) -> Overfull(x))\nPenal(lorelei) -> Ambitious(lorelei)\nAccessary(salmon) -> Penal(salmon)\nforall x (Acidotic(x) and Penal(x) -> Overfull(x))\nforall x (Preferable(x) -> Penal(x))\n\nAmbitious(salmon)\n\nAmbitious(salmon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Nissa is unparented. Jefry is duodenal. Irina is anodal. If Jefry is hortative then Jefry is anodal. Blue things are strategic. If Nissa is unparented then Nissa is hortative. If Irina is sixpenny then Irina is unparented. White, unparented things are strategic. If something is duodenal then it is unparented. Jefry is not hortative.", "logic": "\nUnparented(nissa)\nDuodenal(jefry)\nAnodal(irina)\nHortative(jefry) -> Anodal(jefry)\nforall x (Hortative(x) -> Strategic(x))\nUnparented(nissa) -> Hortative(nissa)\nSixpenny(irina) -> Unparented(irina)\nforall x (Flaxen(x) and Unparented(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Duodenal(x) -> Unparented(x))\n\nnot Hortative(jefry)\n\nnot Hortative(jefry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "Stephanus is piddling. Hesther is swishy. Gideon is taxpaying. If Hesther is childless then Hesther is taxpaying. Blue things are unhardened. If Stephanus is piddling then Stephanus is childless. If Gideon is tailored then Gideon is piddling. White, piddling things are unhardened. If something is swishy then it is piddling. Stephanus is tailored.", "logic": "\nPiddling(stephanus)\nSwishy(hesther)\nTaxpaying(gideon)\nChildless(hesther) -> Taxpaying(hesther)\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nPiddling(stephanus) -> Childless(stephanus)\nTailored(gideon) -> Piddling(gideon)\nforall x (Postural(x) and Piddling(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Swishy(x) -> Piddling(x))\n\nTailored(stephanus)\n\nTailored(stephanus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2096"} {"premises": "The colene is candescent. The colene tote the maisey. The colene tote the samuel. The maisey mambo the samuel. The maisey is taurine. The maisey is viceregal. The maisey tote the samuel. The samuel mambo the colene. The samuel does not see the colene. The samuel tote the maisey. If something is taurine and it chafe the colene then it tote the maisey. If something tote the colene then it chafe the maisey. All viceregal things are not shoddy. If something is viceregal then it chafe the colene. If the maisey is taurine and the maisey tote the colene then the colene tote the maisey. If the samuel mambo the maisey then the samuel is not shoddy. The maisey is taurine.", "logic": "\nCandescent(colene)\nTote(colene, maisey)\nTote(colene, samuel)\nMambo(maisey, samuel)\nTaurine(maisey)\nViceregal(maisey)\nTote(maisey, samuel)\nMambo(samuel, colene)\nnot Tote(samuel, colene)\nTote(samuel, maisey)\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Chafe(x, colene) -> Tote(x, maisey))\nforall x (Tote(x, colene) -> Chafe(x, maisey))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) -> not Shoddy(x))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) -> Chafe(x, colene))\nTaurine(maisey) and Tote(maisey, colene) -> Tote(colene, maisey)\nMambo(samuel, maisey) -> not Shoddy(samuel)\n\nTaurine(maisey)\n\ntherefore Taurine(maisey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The roddy is longtime. The roddy premiere the spiros. The roddy premiere the jaquelin. The spiros motorboat the jaquelin. The spiros is haired. The spiros is syrupy. The spiros premiere the jaquelin. The jaquelin motorboat the roddy. The jaquelin does not see the roddy. The jaquelin premiere the spiros. If something is haired and it whoosh the roddy then it premiere the spiros. If something premiere the roddy then it whoosh the spiros. All syrupy things are not uncaulked. If something is syrupy then it whoosh the roddy. If the spiros is haired and the spiros premiere the roddy then the roddy premiere the spiros. If the jaquelin motorboat the spiros then the jaquelin is not uncaulked. The jaquelin does not chase the roddy.", "logic": "\nLongtime(roddy)\nPremiere(roddy, spiros)\nPremiere(roddy, jaquelin)\nMotorboat(spiros, jaquelin)\nHaired(spiros)\nSyrupy(spiros)\nPremiere(spiros, jaquelin)\nMotorboat(jaquelin, roddy)\nnot Premiere(jaquelin, roddy)\nPremiere(jaquelin, spiros)\nforall x (Haired(x) and Whoosh(x, roddy) -> Premiere(x, spiros))\nforall x (Premiere(x, roddy) -> Whoosh(x, spiros))\nforall x (Syrupy(x) -> not Uncaulked(x))\nforall x (Syrupy(x) -> Whoosh(x, roddy))\nHaired(spiros) and Premiere(spiros, roddy) -> Premiere(roddy, spiros)\nMotorboat(jaquelin, spiros) -> not Uncaulked(jaquelin)\n\nnot Motorboat(jaquelin, roddy)\n\ntherefore Motorboat(jaquelin, roddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The sheeree is preferred. The sheeree delouse the bethanne. The sheeree delouse the gregory. The bethanne deionize the gregory. The bethanne is faced. The bethanne is somali. The bethanne delouse the gregory. The gregory deionize the sheeree. The gregory does not see the sheeree. The gregory delouse the bethanne. If something is faced and it previse the sheeree then it delouse the bethanne. If something delouse the sheeree then it previse the bethanne. All somali things are not stricken. If something is somali then it previse the sheeree. If the bethanne is faced and the bethanne delouse the sheeree then the sheeree delouse the bethanne. If the gregory deionize the bethanne then the gregory is not stricken. The bethanne is not stricken.", "logic": "\nPreferred(sheeree)\nDelouse(sheeree, bethanne)\nDelouse(sheeree, gregory)\nDeionize(bethanne, gregory)\nFaced(bethanne)\nSomali(bethanne)\nDelouse(bethanne, gregory)\nDeionize(gregory, sheeree)\nnot Delouse(gregory, sheeree)\nDelouse(gregory, bethanne)\nforall x (Faced(x) and Previse(x, sheeree) -> Delouse(x, bethanne))\nforall x (Delouse(x, sheeree) -> Previse(x, bethanne))\nforall x (Somali(x) -> not Stricken(x))\nforall x (Somali(x) -> Previse(x, sheeree))\nFaced(bethanne) and Delouse(bethanne, sheeree) -> Delouse(sheeree, bethanne)\nDeionize(gregory, bethanne) -> not Stricken(gregory)\n\nnot Stricken(bethanne)\n\nSomali(bethanne) and forall x (Somali(x) -> not Stricken(x)) -> therefore not Stricken(bethanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The leonelle is divalent. The leonelle inculcate the natalee. The leonelle inculcate the cherey. The natalee assign the cherey. The natalee is malay. The natalee is predaceous. The natalee inculcate the cherey. The cherey assign the leonelle. The cherey does not see the leonelle. The cherey inculcate the natalee. If something is malay and it unyoke the leonelle then it inculcate the natalee. If something inculcate the leonelle then it unyoke the natalee. All predaceous things are not polytonal. If something is predaceous then it unyoke the leonelle. If the natalee is malay and the natalee inculcate the leonelle then the leonelle inculcate the natalee. If the cherey assign the natalee then the cherey is not polytonal. The natalee is polytonal.", "logic": "\nDivalent(leonelle)\nInculcate(leonelle, natalee)\nInculcate(leonelle, cherey)\nAssign(natalee, cherey)\nMalay(natalee)\nPredaceous(natalee)\nInculcate(natalee, cherey)\nAssign(cherey, leonelle)\nnot Inculcate(cherey, leonelle)\nInculcate(cherey, natalee)\nforall x (Malay(x) and Unyoke(x, leonelle) -> Inculcate(x, natalee))\nforall x (Inculcate(x, leonelle) -> Unyoke(x, natalee))\nforall x (Predaceous(x) -> not Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Predaceous(x) -> Unyoke(x, leonelle))\nMalay(natalee) and Inculcate(natalee, leonelle) -> Inculcate(leonelle, natalee)\nAssign(cherey, natalee) -> not Polytonal(cherey)\n\nPolytonal(natalee)\n\nPredaceous(natalee) and forall x (Predaceous(x) -> not Polytonal(x)) -> therefore not Polytonal(natalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The ilise is chained. The ilise remain the belle. The ilise remain the denyse. The belle tweet the denyse. The belle is studious. The belle is premarital. The belle remain the denyse. The denyse tweet the ilise. The denyse does not see the ilise. The denyse remain the belle. If something is studious and it stalinise the ilise then it remain the belle. If something remain the ilise then it stalinise the belle. All premarital things are not exportable. If something is premarital then it stalinise the ilise. If the belle is studious and the belle remain the ilise then the ilise remain the belle. If the denyse tweet the belle then the denyse is not exportable. The belle remain the belle.", "logic": "\nChained(ilise)\nRemain(ilise, belle)\nRemain(ilise, denyse)\nTweet(belle, denyse)\nStudious(belle)\nPremarital(belle)\nRemain(belle, denyse)\nTweet(denyse, ilise)\nnot Remain(denyse, ilise)\nRemain(denyse, belle)\nforall x (Studious(x) and Stalinise(x, ilise) -> Remain(x, belle))\nforall x (Remain(x, ilise) -> Stalinise(x, belle))\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> not Exportable(x))\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> Stalinise(x, ilise))\nStudious(belle) and Remain(belle, ilise) -> Remain(ilise, belle)\nTweet(denyse, belle) -> not Exportable(denyse)\n\nRemain(belle, belle)\n\nPremarital(belle) and forall x (Premarital(x) -> Stalinise(x, ilise)) -> therefore Stalinise(belle, ilise) Studious(belle) and Stalinise(belle, ilise) and forall x (Studious(x) and Stalinise(x, ilise) -> Remain(x, belle)) -> therefore Remain(belle, belle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The rabbi is untrodden. The rabbi behead the blisse. The rabbi behead the cara. The blisse offload the cara. The blisse is glaswegian. The blisse is yellowed. The blisse behead the cara. The cara offload the rabbi. The cara does not see the rabbi. The cara behead the blisse. If something is glaswegian and it hearken the rabbi then it behead the blisse. If something behead the rabbi then it hearken the blisse. All yellowed things are not variegated. If something is yellowed then it hearken the rabbi. If the blisse is glaswegian and the blisse behead the rabbi then the rabbi behead the blisse. If the cara offload the blisse then the cara is not variegated. The blisse does not see the blisse.", "logic": "\nUntrodden(rabbi)\nBehead(rabbi, blisse)\nBehead(rabbi, cara)\nOffload(blisse, cara)\nGlaswegian(blisse)\nYellowed(blisse)\nBehead(blisse, cara)\nOffload(cara, rabbi)\nnot Behead(cara, rabbi)\nBehead(cara, blisse)\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) and Hearken(x, rabbi) -> Behead(x, blisse))\nforall x (Behead(x, rabbi) -> Hearken(x, blisse))\nforall x (Yellowed(x) -> not Variegated(x))\nforall x (Yellowed(x) -> Hearken(x, rabbi))\nGlaswegian(blisse) and Behead(blisse, rabbi) -> Behead(rabbi, blisse)\nOffload(cara, blisse) -> not Variegated(cara)\n\nnot Behead(blisse, blisse)\n\nYellowed(blisse) and forall x (Yellowed(x) -> Hearken(x, rabbi)) -> therefore Hearken(blisse, rabbi) Glaswegian(blisse) and Hearken(blisse, rabbi) and forall x (Glaswegian(x) and Hearken(x, rabbi) -> Behead(x, blisse)) -> therefore Behead(blisse, blisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The anselm is cursed. The anselm steer the mellisa. The anselm steer the tonya. The mellisa renegade the tonya. The mellisa is bedaubed. The mellisa is brooding. The mellisa steer the tonya. The tonya renegade the anselm. The tonya does not see the anselm. The tonya steer the mellisa. If something is bedaubed and it discolour the anselm then it steer the mellisa. If something steer the anselm then it discolour the mellisa. All brooding things are not plural. If something is brooding then it discolour the anselm. If the mellisa is bedaubed and the mellisa steer the anselm then the anselm steer the mellisa. If the tonya renegade the mellisa then the tonya is not plural. The mellisa does not like the mellisa.", "logic": "\nCursed(anselm)\nSteer(anselm, mellisa)\nSteer(anselm, tonya)\nRenegade(mellisa, tonya)\nBedaubed(mellisa)\nBrooding(mellisa)\nSteer(mellisa, tonya)\nRenegade(tonya, anselm)\nnot Steer(tonya, anselm)\nSteer(tonya, mellisa)\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) and Discolour(x, anselm) -> Steer(x, mellisa))\nforall x (Steer(x, anselm) -> Discolour(x, mellisa))\nforall x (Brooding(x) -> not Plural(x))\nforall x (Brooding(x) -> Discolour(x, anselm))\nBedaubed(mellisa) and Steer(mellisa, anselm) -> Steer(anselm, mellisa)\nRenegade(tonya, mellisa) -> not Plural(tonya)\n\nnot Discolour(mellisa, mellisa)\n\nforall x (Steer(x, anselm) -> Discolour(x, mellisa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The bennie is burundian. The bennie jampack the bailie. The bennie jampack the bobbi. The bailie pool the bobbi. The bailie is relative. The bailie is mangled. The bailie jampack the bobbi. The bobbi pool the bennie. The bobbi does not see the bennie. The bobbi jampack the bailie. If something is relative and it engorge the bennie then it jampack the bailie. If something jampack the bennie then it engorge the bailie. All mangled things are not invaluable. If something is mangled then it engorge the bennie. If the bailie is relative and the bailie jampack the bennie then the bennie jampack the bailie. If the bobbi pool the bailie then the bobbi is not invaluable. The bobbi engorge the bennie.", "logic": "\nBurundian(bennie)\nJampack(bennie, bailie)\nJampack(bennie, bobbi)\nPool(bailie, bobbi)\nRelative(bailie)\nMangled(bailie)\nJampack(bailie, bobbi)\nPool(bobbi, bennie)\nnot Jampack(bobbi, bennie)\nJampack(bobbi, bailie)\nforall x (Relative(x) and Engorge(x, bennie) -> Jampack(x, bailie))\nforall x (Jampack(x, bennie) -> Engorge(x, bailie))\nforall x (Mangled(x) -> not Invaluable(x))\nforall x (Mangled(x) -> Engorge(x, bennie))\nRelative(bailie) and Jampack(bailie, bennie) -> Jampack(bennie, bailie)\nPool(bobbi, bailie) -> not Invaluable(bobbi)\n\nEngorge(bobbi, bennie)\n\nforall x (Mangled(x) -> Engorge(x, bennie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The annamari is extensile. The annamari blackjack the jerrie. The annamari blackjack the lust. The jerrie fake the lust. The jerrie is plangent. The jerrie is tramontane. The jerrie blackjack the lust. The lust fake the annamari. The lust does not see the annamari. The lust blackjack the jerrie. If something is plangent and it condone the annamari then it blackjack the jerrie. If something blackjack the annamari then it condone the jerrie. All tramontane things are not guilty. If something is tramontane then it condone the annamari. If the jerrie is plangent and the jerrie blackjack the annamari then the annamari blackjack the jerrie. If the lust fake the jerrie then the lust is not guilty. The annamari does not like the jerrie.", "logic": "\nExtensile(annamari)\nBlackjack(annamari, jerrie)\nBlackjack(annamari, lust)\nFake(jerrie, lust)\nPlangent(jerrie)\nTramontane(jerrie)\nBlackjack(jerrie, lust)\nFake(lust, annamari)\nnot Blackjack(lust, annamari)\nBlackjack(lust, jerrie)\nforall x (Plangent(x) and Condone(x, annamari) -> Blackjack(x, jerrie))\nforall x (Blackjack(x, annamari) -> Condone(x, jerrie))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> not Guilty(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> Condone(x, annamari))\nPlangent(jerrie) and Blackjack(jerrie, annamari) -> Blackjack(annamari, jerrie)\nFake(lust, jerrie) -> not Guilty(lust)\n\nnot Condone(annamari, jerrie)\n\nforall x (Blackjack(x, annamari) -> Condone(x, jerrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The kellie is carousing. The kellie chute the judy. The kellie chute the rori. The judy twinge the rori. The judy is cuspidal. The judy is powerful. The judy chute the rori. The rori twinge the kellie. The rori does not see the kellie. The rori chute the judy. If something is cuspidal and it shoplift the kellie then it chute the judy. If something chute the kellie then it shoplift the judy. All powerful things are not paired. If something is powerful then it shoplift the kellie. If the judy is cuspidal and the judy chute the kellie then the kellie chute the judy. If the rori twinge the judy then the rori is not paired. The rori twinge the judy.", "logic": "\nCarousing(kellie)\nChute(kellie, judy)\nChute(kellie, rori)\nTwinge(judy, rori)\nCuspidal(judy)\nPowerful(judy)\nChute(judy, rori)\nTwinge(rori, kellie)\nnot Chute(rori, kellie)\nChute(rori, judy)\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Shoplift(x, kellie) -> Chute(x, judy))\nforall x (Chute(x, kellie) -> Shoplift(x, judy))\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> not Paired(x))\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> Shoplift(x, kellie))\nCuspidal(judy) and Chute(judy, kellie) -> Chute(kellie, judy)\nTwinge(rori, judy) -> not Paired(rori)\n\nTwinge(rori, judy)\n\nTwinge(rori, judy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The chiarra is tongueless. The chiarra invade the regan. The chiarra invade the jefferey. The regan equivocate the jefferey. The regan is livery. The regan is unoiled. The regan invade the jefferey. The jefferey equivocate the chiarra. The jefferey does not see the chiarra. The jefferey invade the regan. If something is livery and it hymn the chiarra then it invade the regan. If something invade the chiarra then it hymn the regan. All unoiled things are not continuant. If something is unoiled then it hymn the chiarra. If the regan is livery and the regan invade the chiarra then the chiarra invade the regan. If the jefferey equivocate the regan then the jefferey is not continuant. The jefferey is not continuant.", "logic": "\nTongueless(chiarra)\nInvade(chiarra, regan)\nInvade(chiarra, jefferey)\nEquivocate(regan, jefferey)\nLivery(regan)\nUnoiled(regan)\nInvade(regan, jefferey)\nEquivocate(jefferey, chiarra)\nnot Invade(jefferey, chiarra)\nInvade(jefferey, regan)\nforall x (Livery(x) and Hymn(x, chiarra) -> Invade(x, regan))\nforall x (Invade(x, chiarra) -> Hymn(x, regan))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> not Continuant(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> Hymn(x, chiarra))\nLivery(regan) and Invade(regan, chiarra) -> Invade(chiarra, regan)\nEquivocate(jefferey, regan) -> not Continuant(jefferey)\n\nnot Continuant(jefferey)\n\nnot Continuant(jefferey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The lois is stout. The lois recollect the baldwin. The lois recollect the gwyn. The baldwin emulate the gwyn. The baldwin is humbling. The baldwin is algid. The baldwin recollect the gwyn. The gwyn emulate the lois. The gwyn does not see the lois. The gwyn recollect the baldwin. If something is humbling and it jangle the lois then it recollect the baldwin. If something recollect the lois then it jangle the baldwin. All algid things are not godless. If something is algid then it jangle the lois. If the baldwin is humbling and the baldwin recollect the lois then the lois recollect the baldwin. If the gwyn emulate the baldwin then the gwyn is not godless. The lois is blue.", "logic": "\nStout(lois)\nRecollect(lois, baldwin)\nRecollect(lois, gwyn)\nEmulate(baldwin, gwyn)\nHumbling(baldwin)\nAlgid(baldwin)\nRecollect(baldwin, gwyn)\nEmulate(gwyn, lois)\nnot Recollect(gwyn, lois)\nRecollect(gwyn, baldwin)\nforall x (Humbling(x) and Jangle(x, lois) -> Recollect(x, baldwin))\nforall x (Recollect(x, lois) -> Jangle(x, baldwin))\nforall x (Algid(x) -> not Godless(x))\nforall x (Algid(x) -> Jangle(x, lois))\nHumbling(baldwin) and Recollect(baldwin, lois) -> Recollect(lois, baldwin)\nEmulate(gwyn, baldwin) -> not Godless(gwyn)\n\nBlue(lois)\n\nBlue(lois) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "Shena is acaudal. Ameline is unsized. Ameline is biotypic. Ameline is abducent. Ameline is not insolvent. Zea is snappish. Zackariah is acaudal. All snappish people are abducent. All abducent people are biotypic. Shena is acaudal.", "logic": "\nAcaudal(shena)\nUnsized(ameline)\nBiotypic(ameline)\nAbducent(ameline)\nnot Insolvent(ameline)\nSnappish(zea)\nAcaudal(zackariah)\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Abducent(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) -> Biotypic(x))\n\nAcaudal(shena)\n\ntherefore Acaudal(shena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Barbi is equipt. Joellen is yeatsian. Joellen is rhapsodic. Joellen is rimose. Joellen is not prepaid. Giana is ulnar. Coletta is equipt. All ulnar people are rimose. All rimose people are rhapsodic. Joellen is not rimose.", "logic": "\nEquipt(barbi)\nYeatsian(joellen)\nRhapsodic(joellen)\nRimose(joellen)\nnot Prepaid(joellen)\nUlnar(giana)\nEquipt(coletta)\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Rimose(x))\nforall x (Rimose(x) -> Rhapsodic(x))\n\nnot Rimose(joellen)\n\ntherefore Rimose(joellen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Shurlocke is flamboyant. Astrid is consequent. Astrid is tricky. Astrid is delusive. Astrid is not cubist. Austina is scaphoid. Hector is flamboyant. All scaphoid people are delusive. All delusive people are tricky. Austina is delusive.", "logic": "\nFlamboyant(shurlocke)\nConsequent(astrid)\nTricky(astrid)\nDelusive(astrid)\nnot Cubist(astrid)\nScaphoid(austina)\nFlamboyant(hector)\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Delusive(x))\nforall x (Delusive(x) -> Tricky(x))\n\nDelusive(austina)\n\nScaphoid(austina) and forall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Delusive(x)) -> therefore Delusive(austina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Odella is ammoniated. Sky is bipartisan. Sky is ungrasped. Sky is nauruan. Sky is not occurrent. Roland is queasy. Jessalyn is ammoniated. All queasy people are nauruan. All nauruan people are ungrasped. Roland is not nauruan.", "logic": "\nAmmoniated(odella)\nBipartisan(sky)\nUngrasped(sky)\nNauruan(sky)\nnot Occurrent(sky)\nQueasy(roland)\nAmmoniated(jessalyn)\nforall x (Queasy(x) -> Nauruan(x))\nforall x (Nauruan(x) -> Ungrasped(x))\n\nnot Nauruan(roland)\n\nQueasy(roland) and forall x (Queasy(x) -> Nauruan(x)) -> therefore Nauruan(roland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Mohamad is amyloidal. Edythe is seasick. Edythe is dumfounded. Edythe is glycogenic. Edythe is not buddhistic. Ambrosia is botswanan. Casper is amyloidal. All botswanan people are glycogenic. All glycogenic people are dumfounded. Ambrosia is dumfounded.", "logic": "\nAmyloidal(mohamad)\nSeasick(edythe)\nDumfounded(edythe)\nGlycogenic(edythe)\nnot Buddhistic(edythe)\nBotswanan(ambrosia)\nAmyloidal(casper)\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) -> Dumfounded(x))\n\nDumfounded(ambrosia)\n\nBotswanan(ambrosia) and forall x (Botswanan(x) -> Glycogenic(x)) -> therefore Glycogenic(ambrosia) Glycogenic(ambrosia) and forall x (Glycogenic(x) -> Dumfounded(x)) -> therefore Dumfounded(ambrosia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Gen is tacit. Ariadne is dexterous. Ariadne is guarded. Ariadne is speckless. Ariadne is not careless. Berkley is twiglike. Forrest is tacit. All twiglike people are speckless. All speckless people are guarded. Berkley is not guarded.", "logic": "\nTacit(gen)\nDexterous(ariadne)\nGuarded(ariadne)\nSpeckless(ariadne)\nnot Careless(ariadne)\nTwiglike(berkley)\nTacit(forrest)\nforall x (Twiglike(x) -> Speckless(x))\nforall x (Speckless(x) -> Guarded(x))\n\nnot Guarded(berkley)\n\nTwiglike(berkley) and forall x (Twiglike(x) -> Speckless(x)) -> therefore Speckless(berkley) Speckless(berkley) and forall x (Speckless(x) -> Guarded(x)) -> therefore Guarded(berkley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Shelagh is electoral. Stanislaw is weakly. Stanislaw is visible. Stanislaw is sanctioned. Stanislaw is not useable. Sidonia is cachectic. Tiphany is electoral. All cachectic people are sanctioned. All sanctioned people are visible. Shelagh is not sanctioned.", "logic": "\nElectoral(shelagh)\nWeakly(stanislaw)\nVisible(stanislaw)\nSanctioned(stanislaw)\nnot Useable(stanislaw)\nCachectic(sidonia)\nElectoral(tiphany)\nforall x (Cachectic(x) -> Sanctioned(x))\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) -> Visible(x))\n\nnot Sanctioned(shelagh)\n\nforall x (Cachectic(x) -> Sanctioned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Ruth is saltish. Estele is xxxiv. Estele is peaked. Estele is connubial. Estele is not nearby. Devinne is natty. Quint is saltish. All natty people are connubial. All connubial people are peaked. Quint is connubial.", "logic": "\nSaltish(ruth)\nXxxiv(estele)\nPeaked(estele)\nConnubial(estele)\nnot Nearby(estele)\nNatty(devinne)\nSaltish(quint)\nforall x (Natty(x) -> Connubial(x))\nforall x (Connubial(x) -> Peaked(x))\n\nConnubial(quint)\n\nforall x (Natty(x) -> Connubial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Marthena is undiluted. Shanna is repulsive. Shanna is catalan. Shanna is sleety. Shanna is not funny. Meggi is tasty. Chere is undiluted. All tasty people are sleety. All sleety people are catalan. Marthena is not catalan.", "logic": "\nUndiluted(marthena)\nRepulsive(shanna)\nCatalan(shanna)\nSleety(shanna)\nnot Funny(shanna)\nTasty(meggi)\nUndiluted(chere)\nforall x (Tasty(x) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Sleety(x) -> Catalan(x))\n\nnot Catalan(marthena)\n\nforall x (Sleety(x) -> Catalan(x)) <- forall x (Tasty(x) -> Sleety(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Joye is sabine. Hewitt is rectified. Hewitt is sheer. Hewitt is reachable. Hewitt is not sensible. Della is nepalese. Eli is sabine. All nepalese people are reachable. All reachable people are sheer. Eli is rough.", "logic": "\nSabine(joye)\nRectified(hewitt)\nSheer(hewitt)\nReachable(hewitt)\nnot Sensible(hewitt)\nNepalese(della)\nSabine(eli)\nforall x (Nepalese(x) -> Reachable(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) -> Sheer(x))\n\nRough(eli)\n\nRough(eli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Aurlie is fiducial. Theodosia is mendicant. Theodosia is ideologic. Theodosia is augitic. Theodosia is not wayfaring. Tamas is voluptuary. Storm is fiducial. All voluptuary people are augitic. All augitic people are ideologic. Tamas is not fiducial.", "logic": "\nFiducial(aurlie)\nMendicant(theodosia)\nIdeologic(theodosia)\nAugitic(theodosia)\nnot Wayfaring(theodosia)\nVoluptuary(tamas)\nFiducial(storm)\nforall x (Voluptuary(x) -> Augitic(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Ideologic(x))\n\nnot Fiducial(tamas)\n\nnot Fiducial(tamas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "Vinnie is squint. Dolley is grueling. Dolley is mismated. Dolley is agnostical. Dolley is not amok. Aphrodite is intoxicant. Karim is squint. All intoxicant people are agnostical. All agnostical people are mismated. Vinnie is intoxicant.", "logic": "\nSquint(vinnie)\nGrueling(dolley)\nMismated(dolley)\nAgnostical(dolley)\nnot Amok(dolley)\nIntoxicant(aphrodite)\nSquint(karim)\nforall x (Intoxicant(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Mismated(x))\n\nIntoxicant(vinnie)\n\nIntoxicant(vinnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1850"} {"premises": "The dorene dose the alix. The dorene alert the alix. The dorene is ethnologic. The dorene is omani. The dorene is volitional. The dorene is pederastic. The dorene is blissful. The dorene splatter the alix. The alix dose the dorene. The alix alert the dorene. The alix is volitional. The alix splatter the dorene. If something is omani then it alert the alix. If something splatter the alix then the alix is omani. The dorene is blissful.", "logic": "\nDose(dorene, alix)\nAlert(dorene, alix)\nEthnologic(dorene)\nOmani(dorene)\nVolitional(dorene)\nPederastic(dorene)\nBlissful(dorene)\nSplatter(dorene, alix)\nDose(alix, dorene)\nAlert(alix, dorene)\nVolitional(alix)\nSplatter(alix, dorene)\nforall x (Omani(x) -> Alert(x, alix))\nforall x (Splatter(x, alix) -> Omani(alix))\n\nBlissful(dorene)\n\ntherefore Blissful(dorene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The murray prologize the ardelis. The murray nitrify the ardelis. The murray is chartered. The murray is apnoeic. The murray is draconian. The murray is ungeared. The murray is imperial. The murray blush the ardelis. The ardelis prologize the murray. The ardelis nitrify the murray. The ardelis is draconian. The ardelis blush the murray. If something is apnoeic then it nitrify the ardelis. If something blush the ardelis then the ardelis is apnoeic. The murray does not eat the ardelis.", "logic": "\nPrologize(murray, ardelis)\nNitrify(murray, ardelis)\nChartered(murray)\nApnoeic(murray)\nDraconian(murray)\nUngeared(murray)\nImperial(murray)\nBlush(murray, ardelis)\nPrologize(ardelis, murray)\nNitrify(ardelis, murray)\nDraconian(ardelis)\nBlush(ardelis, murray)\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) -> Nitrify(x, ardelis))\nforall x (Blush(x, ardelis) -> Apnoeic(ardelis))\n\nnot Nitrify(murray, ardelis)\n\ntherefore Nitrify(murray, ardelis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The ferdy overcharge the wilhelm. The ferdy bespatter the wilhelm. The ferdy is phenotypic. The ferdy is sworn. The ferdy is potential. The ferdy is infrequent. The ferdy is areolate. The ferdy stress the wilhelm. The wilhelm overcharge the ferdy. The wilhelm bespatter the ferdy. The wilhelm is potential. The wilhelm stress the ferdy. If something is sworn then it bespatter the wilhelm. If something stress the wilhelm then the wilhelm is sworn. The wilhelm is sworn.", "logic": "\nOvercharge(ferdy, wilhelm)\nBespatter(ferdy, wilhelm)\nPhenotypic(ferdy)\nSworn(ferdy)\nPotential(ferdy)\nInfrequent(ferdy)\nAreolate(ferdy)\nStress(ferdy, wilhelm)\nOvercharge(wilhelm, ferdy)\nBespatter(wilhelm, ferdy)\nPotential(wilhelm)\nStress(wilhelm, ferdy)\nforall x (Sworn(x) -> Bespatter(x, wilhelm))\nforall x (Stress(x, wilhelm) -> Sworn(wilhelm))\n\nSworn(wilhelm)\n\nStress(ferdy, wilhelm) and forall x (Stress(x, wilhelm) -> Sworn(wilhelm)) -> therefore Sworn(wilhelm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The fan burthen the serene. The fan copyright the serene. The fan is outrigged. The fan is landlocked. The fan is pinchbeck. The fan is sought. The fan is jumbo. The fan interpret the serene. The serene burthen the fan. The serene copyright the fan. The serene is pinchbeck. The serene interpret the fan. If something is landlocked then it copyright the serene. If something interpret the serene then the serene is landlocked. The serene is not landlocked.", "logic": "\nBurthen(fan, serene)\nCopyright(fan, serene)\nOutrigged(fan)\nLandlocked(fan)\nPinchbeck(fan)\nSought(fan)\nJumbo(fan)\nInterpret(fan, serene)\nBurthen(serene, fan)\nCopyright(serene, fan)\nPinchbeck(serene)\nInterpret(serene, fan)\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Copyright(x, serene))\nforall x (Interpret(x, serene) -> Landlocked(serene))\n\nnot Landlocked(serene)\n\nInterpret(fan, serene) and forall x (Interpret(x, serene) -> Landlocked(serene)) -> therefore Landlocked(serene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The reba lead the sarette. The reba care the sarette. The reba is weakening. The reba is slithery. The reba is stinting. The reba is coseismal. The reba is interwoven. The reba substitute the sarette. The sarette lead the reba. The sarette care the reba. The sarette is stinting. The sarette substitute the reba. If something is slithery then it care the sarette. If something substitute the sarette then the sarette is slithery. The sarette care the sarette.", "logic": "\nLead(reba, sarette)\nCare(reba, sarette)\nWeakening(reba)\nSlithery(reba)\nStinting(reba)\nCoseismal(reba)\nInterwoven(reba)\nSubstitute(reba, sarette)\nLead(sarette, reba)\nCare(sarette, reba)\nStinting(sarette)\nSubstitute(sarette, reba)\nforall x (Slithery(x) -> Care(x, sarette))\nforall x (Substitute(x, sarette) -> Slithery(sarette))\n\nCare(sarette, sarette)\n\nSubstitute(reba, sarette) and forall x (Substitute(x, sarette) -> Slithery(sarette)) -> therefore Slithery(sarette) Slithery(sarette) and forall x (Slithery(x) -> Care(x, sarette)) -> therefore Care(sarette, sarette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The emmalee point the warden. The emmalee slalom the warden. The emmalee is monoatomic. The emmalee is tops. The emmalee is urceolate. The emmalee is gnarly. The emmalee is grueling. The emmalee play the warden. The warden point the emmalee. The warden slalom the emmalee. The warden is urceolate. The warden play the emmalee. If something is tops then it slalom the warden. If something play the warden then the warden is tops. The warden does not eat the warden.", "logic": "\nPoint(emmalee, warden)\nSlalom(emmalee, warden)\nMonoatomic(emmalee)\nTops(emmalee)\nUrceolate(emmalee)\nGnarly(emmalee)\nGrueling(emmalee)\nPlay(emmalee, warden)\nPoint(warden, emmalee)\nSlalom(warden, emmalee)\nUrceolate(warden)\nPlay(warden, emmalee)\nforall x (Tops(x) -> Slalom(x, warden))\nforall x (Play(x, warden) -> Tops(warden))\n\nnot Slalom(warden, warden)\n\nPlay(emmalee, warden) and forall x (Play(x, warden) -> Tops(warden)) -> therefore Tops(warden) Tops(warden) and forall x (Tops(x) -> Slalom(x, warden)) -> therefore Slalom(warden, warden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The harris ensure the wrennie. The harris subscribe the wrennie. The harris is expired. The harris is bubonic. The harris is untidy. The harris is dominating. The harris is plaguey. The harris startle the wrennie. The wrennie ensure the harris. The wrennie subscribe the harris. The wrennie is untidy. The wrennie startle the harris. If something is bubonic then it subscribe the wrennie. If something startle the wrennie then the wrennie is bubonic. The wrennie does not see the wrennie.", "logic": "\nEnsure(harris, wrennie)\nSubscribe(harris, wrennie)\nExpired(harris)\nBubonic(harris)\nUntidy(harris)\nDominating(harris)\nPlaguey(harris)\nStartle(harris, wrennie)\nEnsure(wrennie, harris)\nSubscribe(wrennie, harris)\nUntidy(wrennie)\nStartle(wrennie, harris)\nforall x (Bubonic(x) -> Subscribe(x, wrennie))\nforall x (Startle(x, wrennie) -> Bubonic(wrennie))\n\nnot Startle(wrennie, wrennie)\n\nnot Startle(wrennie, wrennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The ethan splash the leanora. The ethan splutter the leanora. The ethan is sugared. The ethan is different. The ethan is diocesan. The ethan is unmanned. The ethan is mishnaic. The ethan gainsay the leanora. The leanora splash the ethan. The leanora splutter the ethan. The leanora is diocesan. The leanora gainsay the ethan. If something is different then it splutter the leanora. If something gainsay the leanora then the leanora is different. The leanora is sugared.", "logic": "\nSplash(ethan, leanora)\nSplutter(ethan, leanora)\nSugared(ethan)\nDifferent(ethan)\nDiocesan(ethan)\nUnmanned(ethan)\nMishnaic(ethan)\nGainsay(ethan, leanora)\nSplash(leanora, ethan)\nSplutter(leanora, ethan)\nDiocesan(leanora)\nGainsay(leanora, ethan)\nforall x (Different(x) -> Splutter(x, leanora))\nforall x (Gainsay(x, leanora) -> Different(leanora))\n\nSugared(leanora)\n\nSugared(leanora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The walton snip the codi. The walton shame the codi. The walton is benefic. The walton is marian. The walton is wholesome. The walton is notifiable. The walton is proximate. The walton blandish the codi. The codi snip the walton. The codi shame the walton. The codi is wholesome. The codi blandish the walton. If something is marian then it shame the codi. If something blandish the codi then the codi is marian. The codi is not notifiable.", "logic": "\nSnip(walton, codi)\nShame(walton, codi)\nBenefic(walton)\nMarian(walton)\nWholesome(walton)\nNotifiable(walton)\nProximate(walton)\nBlandish(walton, codi)\nSnip(codi, walton)\nShame(codi, walton)\nWholesome(codi)\nBlandish(codi, walton)\nforall x (Marian(x) -> Shame(x, codi))\nforall x (Blandish(x, codi) -> Marian(codi))\n\nnot Notifiable(codi)\n\nnot Notifiable(codi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The endora skip the latashia. The endora swelter the latashia. The endora is insulting. The endora is sunless. The endora is early. The endora is legal. The endora is oleophobic. The endora tick the latashia. The latashia skip the endora. The latashia swelter the endora. The latashia is early. The latashia tick the endora. If something is sunless then it swelter the latashia. If something tick the latashia then the latashia is sunless. The endora swelter the endora.", "logic": "\nSkip(endora, latashia)\nSwelter(endora, latashia)\nInsulting(endora)\nSunless(endora)\nEarly(endora)\nLegal(endora)\nOleophobic(endora)\nTick(endora, latashia)\nSkip(latashia, endora)\nSwelter(latashia, endora)\nEarly(latashia)\nTick(latashia, endora)\nforall x (Sunless(x) -> Swelter(x, latashia))\nforall x (Tick(x, latashia) -> Sunless(latashia))\n\nSwelter(endora, endora)\n\nSwelter(endora, endora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The solly urbanise the davin. The solly claret the davin. The solly is denotative. The solly is afrikaner. The solly is straw. The solly is immediate. The solly is idealised. The solly oyster the davin. The davin urbanise the solly. The davin claret the solly. The davin is straw. The davin oyster the solly. If something is afrikaner then it claret the davin. If something oyster the davin then the davin is afrikaner. The solly does not chase the solly.", "logic": "\nUrbanise(solly, davin)\nClaret(solly, davin)\nDenotative(solly)\nAfrikaner(solly)\nStraw(solly)\nImmediate(solly)\nIdealised(solly)\nOyster(solly, davin)\nUrbanise(davin, solly)\nClaret(davin, solly)\nStraw(davin)\nOyster(davin, solly)\nforall x (Afrikaner(x) -> Claret(x, davin))\nforall x (Oyster(x, davin) -> Afrikaner(davin))\n\nnot Urbanise(solly, solly)\n\nnot Urbanise(solly, solly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The guido implode the deb. The guido harmonise the deb. The guido is firm. The guido is scrupulous. The guido is scarlet. The guido is earthlike. The guido is selfless. The guido volatilize the deb. The deb implode the guido. The deb harmonise the guido. The deb is scarlet. The deb volatilize the guido. If something is scrupulous then it harmonise the deb. If something volatilize the deb then the deb is scrupulous. The deb implode the deb.", "logic": "\nImplode(guido, deb)\nHarmonise(guido, deb)\nFirm(guido)\nScrupulous(guido)\nScarlet(guido)\nEarthlike(guido)\nSelfless(guido)\nVolatilize(guido, deb)\nImplode(deb, guido)\nHarmonise(deb, guido)\nScarlet(deb)\nVolatilize(deb, guido)\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Harmonise(x, deb))\nforall x (Volatilize(x, deb) -> Scrupulous(deb))\n\nImplode(deb, deb)\n\nImplode(deb, deb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1401"} {"premises": "The crissy is generative. The crissy is not clammy. The bekki prevail the crissy. The bekki rhyme the crissy. The archon is clammy. The archon prevail the crissy. The archon rhyme the bekki. If the bekki is ectodermal and the archon does not like the bekki then the bekki is generative. If someone boomerang the crissy and they do not see the archon then the archon boomerang the crissy. If someone is mawkish then they do not see the crissy. If someone boomerang the crissy and the crissy is not clammy then they like the archon. If someone is clammy then they like the crissy. If someone rhyme the crissy then the crissy prevail the bekki. The bekki prevail the crissy.", "logic": "\nGenerative(crissy)\nnot Clammy(crissy)\nPrevail(bekki, crissy)\nRhyme(bekki, crissy)\nClammy(archon)\nPrevail(archon, crissy)\nRhyme(archon, bekki)\nEctodermal(bekki) and not Boomerang(archon, bekki) -> Generative(bekki)\nforall x (Boomerang(x, crissy) and not Rhyme(x, archon) -> Boomerang(archon, crissy))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> not Rhyme(x, crissy))\nforall x (Boomerang(x, crissy) and not Clammy(crissy) -> Boomerang(x, archon))\nforall x (Clammy(x) -> Boomerang(x, crissy))\nforall x (Rhyme(x, crissy) -> Prevail(crissy, bekki))\n\nPrevail(bekki, crissy)\n\ntherefore Prevail(bekki, crissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The wilone is xliii. The wilone is not planned. The silvester tinct the wilone. The silvester denazify the wilone. The konstanze is planned. The konstanze tinct the wilone. The konstanze denazify the silvester. If the silvester is esthetic and the konstanze does not like the silvester then the silvester is xliii. If someone retake the wilone and they do not see the konstanze then the konstanze retake the wilone. If someone is sizeable then they do not see the wilone. If someone retake the wilone and the wilone is not planned then they like the konstanze. If someone is planned then they like the wilone. If someone denazify the wilone then the wilone tinct the silvester. The konstanze does not see the silvester.", "logic": "\nXliii(wilone)\nnot Planned(wilone)\nTinct(silvester, wilone)\nDenazify(silvester, wilone)\nPlanned(konstanze)\nTinct(konstanze, wilone)\nDenazify(konstanze, silvester)\nEsthetic(silvester) and not Retake(konstanze, silvester) -> Xliii(silvester)\nforall x (Retake(x, wilone) and not Denazify(x, konstanze) -> Retake(konstanze, wilone))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) -> not Denazify(x, wilone))\nforall x (Retake(x, wilone) and not Planned(wilone) -> Retake(x, konstanze))\nforall x (Planned(x) -> Retake(x, wilone))\nforall x (Denazify(x, wilone) -> Tinct(wilone, silvester))\n\nnot Denazify(konstanze, silvester)\n\ntherefore Denazify(konstanze, silvester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The lusa is infeasible. The lusa is not brainsick. The kamilah provide the lusa. The kamilah froth the lusa. The aimil is brainsick. The aimil provide the lusa. The aimil froth the kamilah. If the kamilah is stable and the aimil does not like the kamilah then the kamilah is infeasible. If someone stake the lusa and they do not see the aimil then the aimil stake the lusa. If someone is risen then they do not see the lusa. If someone stake the lusa and the lusa is not brainsick then they like the aimil. If someone is brainsick then they like the lusa. If someone froth the lusa then the lusa provide the kamilah. The lusa provide the kamilah.", "logic": "\nInfeasible(lusa)\nnot Brainsick(lusa)\nProvide(kamilah, lusa)\nFroth(kamilah, lusa)\nBrainsick(aimil)\nProvide(aimil, lusa)\nFroth(aimil, kamilah)\nStable(kamilah) and not Stake(aimil, kamilah) -> Infeasible(kamilah)\nforall x (Stake(x, lusa) and not Froth(x, aimil) -> Stake(aimil, lusa))\nforall x (Risen(x) -> not Froth(x, lusa))\nforall x (Stake(x, lusa) and not Brainsick(lusa) -> Stake(x, aimil))\nforall x (Brainsick(x) -> Stake(x, lusa))\nforall x (Froth(x, lusa) -> Provide(lusa, kamilah))\n\nProvide(lusa, kamilah)\n\nFroth(kamilah, lusa) and forall x (Froth(x, lusa) -> Provide(lusa, kamilah)) -> therefore Provide(lusa, kamilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The mattias is vigilant. The mattias is not drugless. The gayle exhibit the mattias. The gayle corduroy the mattias. The javier is drugless. The javier exhibit the mattias. The javier corduroy the gayle. If the gayle is spondaic and the javier does not like the gayle then the gayle is vigilant. If someone flux the mattias and they do not see the javier then the javier flux the mattias. If someone is unforceful then they do not see the mattias. If someone flux the mattias and the mattias is not drugless then they like the javier. If someone is drugless then they like the mattias. If someone corduroy the mattias then the mattias exhibit the gayle. The mattias does not need the gayle.", "logic": "\nVigilant(mattias)\nnot Drugless(mattias)\nExhibit(gayle, mattias)\nCorduroy(gayle, mattias)\nDrugless(javier)\nExhibit(javier, mattias)\nCorduroy(javier, gayle)\nSpondaic(gayle) and not Flux(javier, gayle) -> Vigilant(gayle)\nforall x (Flux(x, mattias) and not Corduroy(x, javier) -> Flux(javier, mattias))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) -> not Corduroy(x, mattias))\nforall x (Flux(x, mattias) and not Drugless(mattias) -> Flux(x, javier))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Flux(x, mattias))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, mattias) -> Exhibit(mattias, gayle))\n\nnot Exhibit(mattias, gayle)\n\nCorduroy(gayle, mattias) and forall x (Corduroy(x, mattias) -> Exhibit(mattias, gayle)) -> therefore Exhibit(mattias, gayle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The nevsa is unearthly. The nevsa is not unruly. The herschel thicken the nevsa. The herschel fructify the nevsa. The thad is unruly. The thad thicken the nevsa. The thad fructify the herschel. If the herschel is lackluster and the thad does not like the herschel then the herschel is unearthly. If someone relativise the nevsa and they do not see the thad then the thad relativise the nevsa. If someone is prostate then they do not see the nevsa. If someone relativise the nevsa and the nevsa is not unruly then they like the thad. If someone is unruly then they like the nevsa. If someone fructify the nevsa then the nevsa thicken the herschel. The thad relativise the thad.", "logic": "\nUnearthly(nevsa)\nnot Unruly(nevsa)\nThicken(herschel, nevsa)\nFructify(herschel, nevsa)\nUnruly(thad)\nThicken(thad, nevsa)\nFructify(thad, herschel)\nLackluster(herschel) and not Relativise(thad, herschel) -> Unearthly(herschel)\nforall x (Relativise(x, nevsa) and not Fructify(x, thad) -> Relativise(thad, nevsa))\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> not Fructify(x, nevsa))\nforall x (Relativise(x, nevsa) and not Unruly(nevsa) -> Relativise(x, thad))\nforall x (Unruly(x) -> Relativise(x, nevsa))\nforall x (Fructify(x, nevsa) -> Thicken(nevsa, herschel))\n\nRelativise(thad, thad)\n\nUnruly(thad) and forall x (Unruly(x) -> Relativise(x, nevsa)) -> therefore Relativise(thad, nevsa) Relativise(thad, nevsa) and not Unruly(nevsa) and forall x (Relativise(x, nevsa) and not Unruly(nevsa) -> Relativise(x, thad)) -> therefore Relativise(thad, thad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The mose is windy. The mose is not inarguable. The jaquelin carol the mose. The jaquelin crush the mose. The margie is inarguable. The margie carol the mose. The margie crush the jaquelin. If the jaquelin is feminine and the margie does not like the jaquelin then the jaquelin is windy. If someone zest the mose and they do not see the margie then the margie zest the mose. If someone is lumbering then they do not see the mose. If someone zest the mose and the mose is not inarguable then they like the margie. If someone is inarguable then they like the mose. If someone crush the mose then the mose carol the jaquelin. The margie does not like the margie.", "logic": "\nWindy(mose)\nnot Inarguable(mose)\nCarol(jaquelin, mose)\nCrush(jaquelin, mose)\nInarguable(margie)\nCarol(margie, mose)\nCrush(margie, jaquelin)\nFeminine(jaquelin) and not Zest(margie, jaquelin) -> Windy(jaquelin)\nforall x (Zest(x, mose) and not Crush(x, margie) -> Zest(margie, mose))\nforall x (Lumbering(x) -> not Crush(x, mose))\nforall x (Zest(x, mose) and not Inarguable(mose) -> Zest(x, margie))\nforall x (Inarguable(x) -> Zest(x, mose))\nforall x (Crush(x, mose) -> Carol(mose, jaquelin))\n\nnot Zest(margie, margie)\n\nInarguable(margie) and forall x (Inarguable(x) -> Zest(x, mose)) -> therefore Zest(margie, mose) Zest(margie, mose) and not Inarguable(mose) and forall x (Zest(x, mose) and not Inarguable(mose) -> Zest(x, margie)) -> therefore Zest(margie, margie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The nonie is unicuspid. The nonie is not exsanguine. The chickie narrow the nonie. The chickie growl the nonie. The matilda is exsanguine. The matilda narrow the nonie. The matilda growl the chickie. If the chickie is dural and the matilda does not like the chickie then the chickie is unicuspid. If someone mistake the nonie and they do not see the matilda then the matilda mistake the nonie. If someone is mourning then they do not see the nonie. If someone mistake the nonie and the nonie is not exsanguine then they like the matilda. If someone is exsanguine then they like the nonie. If someone growl the nonie then the nonie narrow the chickie. The chickie does not like the nonie.", "logic": "\nUnicuspid(nonie)\nnot Exsanguine(nonie)\nNarrow(chickie, nonie)\nGrowl(chickie, nonie)\nExsanguine(matilda)\nNarrow(matilda, nonie)\nGrowl(matilda, chickie)\nDural(chickie) and not Mistake(matilda, chickie) -> Unicuspid(chickie)\nforall x (Mistake(x, nonie) and not Growl(x, matilda) -> Mistake(matilda, nonie))\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> not Growl(x, nonie))\nforall x (Mistake(x, nonie) and not Exsanguine(nonie) -> Mistake(x, matilda))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) -> Mistake(x, nonie))\nforall x (Growl(x, nonie) -> Narrow(nonie, chickie))\n\nnot Mistake(chickie, nonie)\n\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) -> Mistake(x, nonie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The joceline is jejune. The joceline is not autarchic. The harley educate the joceline. The harley blither the joceline. The nydia is autarchic. The nydia educate the joceline. The nydia blither the harley. If the harley is analeptic and the nydia does not like the harley then the harley is jejune. If someone mensurate the joceline and they do not see the nydia then the nydia mensurate the joceline. If someone is cowled then they do not see the joceline. If someone mensurate the joceline and the joceline is not autarchic then they like the nydia. If someone is autarchic then they like the joceline. If someone blither the joceline then the joceline educate the harley. The harley is jejune.", "logic": "\nJejune(joceline)\nnot Autarchic(joceline)\nEducate(harley, joceline)\nBlither(harley, joceline)\nAutarchic(nydia)\nEducate(nydia, joceline)\nBlither(nydia, harley)\nAnaleptic(harley) and not Mensurate(nydia, harley) -> Jejune(harley)\nforall x (Mensurate(x, joceline) and not Blither(x, nydia) -> Mensurate(nydia, joceline))\nforall x (Cowled(x) -> not Blither(x, joceline))\nforall x (Mensurate(x, joceline) and not Autarchic(joceline) -> Mensurate(x, nydia))\nforall x (Autarchic(x) -> Mensurate(x, joceline))\nforall x (Blither(x, joceline) -> Educate(joceline, harley))\n\nJejune(harley)\n\nAnaleptic(harley) and not Mensurate(nydia, harley) -> Jejune(harley) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The carolie is taoist. The carolie is not reduced. The clarance crouch the carolie. The clarance pyramid the carolie. The helise is reduced. The helise crouch the carolie. The helise pyramid the clarance. If the clarance is ventilated and the helise does not like the clarance then the clarance is taoist. If someone irradiate the carolie and they do not see the helise then the helise irradiate the carolie. If someone is unhewn then they do not see the carolie. If someone irradiate the carolie and the carolie is not reduced then they like the helise. If someone is reduced then they like the carolie. If someone pyramid the carolie then the carolie crouch the clarance. The clarance does not like the helise.", "logic": "\nTaoist(carolie)\nnot Reduced(carolie)\nCrouch(clarance, carolie)\nPyramid(clarance, carolie)\nReduced(helise)\nCrouch(helise, carolie)\nPyramid(helise, clarance)\nVentilated(clarance) and not Irradiate(helise, clarance) -> Taoist(clarance)\nforall x (Irradiate(x, carolie) and not Pyramid(x, helise) -> Irradiate(helise, carolie))\nforall x (Unhewn(x) -> not Pyramid(x, carolie))\nforall x (Irradiate(x, carolie) and not Reduced(carolie) -> Irradiate(x, helise))\nforall x (Reduced(x) -> Irradiate(x, carolie))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, carolie) -> Crouch(carolie, clarance))\n\nnot Irradiate(clarance, helise)\n\nforall x (Irradiate(x, carolie) and not Reduced(carolie) -> Irradiate(x, helise)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The olga is unclipped. The olga is not erotic. The tyrone incandesce the olga. The tyrone banquet the olga. The avraham is erotic. The avraham incandesce the olga. The avraham banquet the tyrone. If the tyrone is lidless and the avraham does not like the tyrone then the tyrone is unclipped. If someone sinter the olga and they do not see the avraham then the avraham sinter the olga. If someone is cutaneal then they do not see the olga. If someone sinter the olga and the olga is not erotic then they like the avraham. If someone is erotic then they like the olga. If someone banquet the olga then the olga incandesce the tyrone. The olga incandesce the avraham.", "logic": "\nUnclipped(olga)\nnot Erotic(olga)\nIncandesce(tyrone, olga)\nBanquet(tyrone, olga)\nErotic(avraham)\nIncandesce(avraham, olga)\nBanquet(avraham, tyrone)\nLidless(tyrone) and not Sinter(avraham, tyrone) -> Unclipped(tyrone)\nforall x (Sinter(x, olga) and not Banquet(x, avraham) -> Sinter(avraham, olga))\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) -> not Banquet(x, olga))\nforall x (Sinter(x, olga) and not Erotic(olga) -> Sinter(x, avraham))\nforall x (Erotic(x) -> Sinter(x, olga))\nforall x (Banquet(x, olga) -> Incandesce(olga, tyrone))\n\nIncandesce(olga, avraham)\n\nIncandesce(olga, avraham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The amandi is motorial. The amandi is not looking. The cele harken the amandi. The cele booze the amandi. The llewellyn is looking. The llewellyn harken the amandi. The llewellyn booze the cele. If the cele is nagging and the llewellyn does not like the cele then the cele is motorial. If someone destroy the amandi and they do not see the llewellyn then the llewellyn destroy the amandi. If someone is funereal then they do not see the amandi. If someone destroy the amandi and the amandi is not looking then they like the llewellyn. If someone is looking then they like the amandi. If someone booze the amandi then the amandi harken the cele. The cele does not see the llewellyn.", "logic": "\nMotorial(amandi)\nnot Looking(amandi)\nHarken(cele, amandi)\nBooze(cele, amandi)\nLooking(llewellyn)\nHarken(llewellyn, amandi)\nBooze(llewellyn, cele)\nNagging(cele) and not Destroy(llewellyn, cele) -> Motorial(cele)\nforall x (Destroy(x, amandi) and not Booze(x, llewellyn) -> Destroy(llewellyn, amandi))\nforall x (Funereal(x) -> not Booze(x, amandi))\nforall x (Destroy(x, amandi) and not Looking(amandi) -> Destroy(x, llewellyn))\nforall x (Looking(x) -> Destroy(x, amandi))\nforall x (Booze(x, amandi) -> Harken(amandi, cele))\n\nnot Booze(cele, llewellyn)\n\nnot Booze(cele, llewellyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The cheston is dilatory. The cheston is not marmoreal. The baxter cuss the cheston. The baxter sample the cheston. The corenda is marmoreal. The corenda cuss the cheston. The corenda sample the baxter. If the baxter is patterned and the corenda does not like the baxter then the baxter is dilatory. If someone nettle the cheston and they do not see the corenda then the corenda nettle the cheston. If someone is benignant then they do not see the cheston. If someone nettle the cheston and the cheston is not marmoreal then they like the corenda. If someone is marmoreal then they like the cheston. If someone sample the cheston then the cheston cuss the baxter. The baxter is nice.", "logic": "\nDilatory(cheston)\nnot Marmoreal(cheston)\nCuss(baxter, cheston)\nSample(baxter, cheston)\nMarmoreal(corenda)\nCuss(corenda, cheston)\nSample(corenda, baxter)\nPatterned(baxter) and not Nettle(corenda, baxter) -> Dilatory(baxter)\nforall x (Nettle(x, cheston) and not Sample(x, corenda) -> Nettle(corenda, cheston))\nforall x (Benignant(x) -> not Sample(x, cheston))\nforall x (Nettle(x, cheston) and not Marmoreal(cheston) -> Nettle(x, corenda))\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Nettle(x, cheston))\nforall x (Sample(x, cheston) -> Cuss(cheston, baxter))\n\nNice(baxter)\n\nNice(baxter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2142"} {"premises": "The milo is tinpot. The meredith slobber the milo. The joanna execute the milo. If something is yuman and recluse then it execute the joanna. If the joanna is not kooky then the joanna is shadowy. If the milo does not need the meredith then the meredith does not need the milo. If something glide the joanna and it execute the milo then the joanna slobber the meredith. If something slobber the milo then it glide the joanna. If something glide the joanna then it glide the milo. The milo is tinpot.", "logic": "\nTinpot(milo)\nSlobber(meredith, milo)\nExecute(joanna, milo)\nforall x (Yuman(x) and Recluse(x) -> Execute(x, joanna))\nnot Kooky(joanna) -> Shadowy(joanna)\nnot Execute(milo, meredith) -> not Execute(meredith, milo)\nforall x (Glide(x, joanna) and Execute(x, milo) -> Slobber(joanna, meredith))\nforall x (Slobber(x, milo) -> Glide(x, joanna))\nforall x (Glide(x, joanna) -> Glide(x, milo))\n\nTinpot(milo)\n\ntherefore Tinpot(milo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The gisela is sunlit. The carleen unzip the gisela. The thaxter lynch the gisela. If something is ardent and lxxviii then it lynch the thaxter. If the thaxter is not chestnut then the thaxter is opportune. If the gisela does not need the carleen then the carleen does not need the gisela. If something jelly the thaxter and it lynch the gisela then the thaxter unzip the carleen. If something unzip the gisela then it jelly the thaxter. If something jelly the thaxter then it jelly the gisela. The thaxter does not need the gisela.", "logic": "\nSunlit(gisela)\nUnzip(carleen, gisela)\nLynch(thaxter, gisela)\nforall x (Ardent(x) and Lxxviii(x) -> Lynch(x, thaxter))\nnot Chestnut(thaxter) -> Opportune(thaxter)\nnot Lynch(gisela, carleen) -> not Lynch(carleen, gisela)\nforall x (Jelly(x, thaxter) and Lynch(x, gisela) -> Unzip(thaxter, carleen))\nforall x (Unzip(x, gisela) -> Jelly(x, thaxter))\nforall x (Jelly(x, thaxter) -> Jelly(x, gisela))\n\nnot Lynch(thaxter, gisela)\n\ntherefore Lynch(thaxter, gisela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The torey is developed. The elga reorder the torey. The rosie lipread the torey. If something is razed and chechen then it lipread the rosie. If the rosie is not miscible then the rosie is oleophobic. If the torey does not need the elga then the elga does not need the torey. If something fulminate the rosie and it lipread the torey then the rosie reorder the elga. If something reorder the torey then it fulminate the rosie. If something fulminate the rosie then it fulminate the torey. The elga fulminate the rosie.", "logic": "\nDeveloped(torey)\nReorder(elga, torey)\nLipread(rosie, torey)\nforall x (Razed(x) and Chechen(x) -> Lipread(x, rosie))\nnot Miscible(rosie) -> Oleophobic(rosie)\nnot Lipread(torey, elga) -> not Lipread(elga, torey)\nforall x (Fulminate(x, rosie) and Lipread(x, torey) -> Reorder(rosie, elga))\nforall x (Reorder(x, torey) -> Fulminate(x, rosie))\nforall x (Fulminate(x, rosie) -> Fulminate(x, torey))\n\nFulminate(elga, rosie)\n\nReorder(elga, torey) and forall x (Reorder(x, torey) -> Fulminate(x, rosie)) -> therefore Fulminate(elga, rosie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The lilias is gratified. The greg pulp the lilias. The lex scud the lilias. If something is towering and classy then it scud the lex. If the lex is not anguine then the lex is vinegary. If the lilias does not need the greg then the greg does not need the lilias. If something bunker the lex and it scud the lilias then the lex pulp the greg. If something pulp the lilias then it bunker the lex. If something bunker the lex then it bunker the lilias. The greg does not eat the lex.", "logic": "\nGratified(lilias)\nPulp(greg, lilias)\nScud(lex, lilias)\nforall x (Towering(x) and Classy(x) -> Scud(x, lex))\nnot Anguine(lex) -> Vinegary(lex)\nnot Scud(lilias, greg) -> not Scud(greg, lilias)\nforall x (Bunker(x, lex) and Scud(x, lilias) -> Pulp(lex, greg))\nforall x (Pulp(x, lilias) -> Bunker(x, lex))\nforall x (Bunker(x, lex) -> Bunker(x, lilias))\n\nnot Bunker(greg, lex)\n\nPulp(greg, lilias) and forall x (Pulp(x, lilias) -> Bunker(x, lex)) -> therefore Bunker(greg, lex)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The lori is accordant. The roderic defoliate the lori. The ailey peeve the lori. If something is urceolate and aldehydic then it peeve the ailey. If the ailey is not deciphered then the ailey is haemic. If the lori does not need the roderic then the roderic does not need the lori. If something cozen the ailey and it peeve the lori then the ailey defoliate the roderic. If something defoliate the lori then it cozen the ailey. If something cozen the ailey then it cozen the lori. The roderic cozen the lori.", "logic": "\nAccordant(lori)\nDefoliate(roderic, lori)\nPeeve(ailey, lori)\nforall x (Urceolate(x) and Aldehydic(x) -> Peeve(x, ailey))\nnot Deciphered(ailey) -> Haemic(ailey)\nnot Peeve(lori, roderic) -> not Peeve(roderic, lori)\nforall x (Cozen(x, ailey) and Peeve(x, lori) -> Defoliate(ailey, roderic))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, lori) -> Cozen(x, ailey))\nforall x (Cozen(x, ailey) -> Cozen(x, lori))\n\nCozen(roderic, lori)\n\nDefoliate(roderic, lori) and forall x (Defoliate(x, lori) -> Cozen(x, ailey)) -> therefore Cozen(roderic, ailey) Cozen(roderic, ailey) and forall x (Cozen(x, ailey) -> Cozen(x, lori)) -> therefore Cozen(roderic, lori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The mylo is estrogenic. The kelsey shift the mylo. The georgine flood the mylo. If something is overeager and corked then it flood the georgine. If the georgine is not colorful then the georgine is potable. If the mylo does not need the kelsey then the kelsey does not need the mylo. If something chaff the georgine and it flood the mylo then the georgine shift the kelsey. If something shift the mylo then it chaff the georgine. If something chaff the georgine then it chaff the mylo. The kelsey does not eat the mylo.", "logic": "\nEstrogenic(mylo)\nShift(kelsey, mylo)\nFlood(georgine, mylo)\nforall x (Overeager(x) and Corked(x) -> Flood(x, georgine))\nnot Colorful(georgine) -> Potable(georgine)\nnot Flood(mylo, kelsey) -> not Flood(kelsey, mylo)\nforall x (Chaff(x, georgine) and Flood(x, mylo) -> Shift(georgine, kelsey))\nforall x (Shift(x, mylo) -> Chaff(x, georgine))\nforall x (Chaff(x, georgine) -> Chaff(x, mylo))\n\nnot Chaff(kelsey, mylo)\n\nShift(kelsey, mylo) and forall x (Shift(x, mylo) -> Chaff(x, georgine)) -> therefore Chaff(kelsey, georgine) Chaff(kelsey, georgine) and forall x (Chaff(x, georgine) -> Chaff(x, mylo)) -> therefore Chaff(kelsey, mylo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The theo is carotid. The yvonne annihilate the theo. The alene truck the theo. If something is trussed and garbled then it truck the alene. If the alene is not bilabiate then the alene is medicinal. If the theo does not need the yvonne then the yvonne does not need the theo. If something manicure the alene and it truck the theo then the alene annihilate the yvonne. If something annihilate the theo then it manicure the alene. If something manicure the alene then it manicure the theo. The alene does not see the yvonne.", "logic": "\nCarotid(theo)\nAnnihilate(yvonne, theo)\nTruck(alene, theo)\nforall x (Trussed(x) and Garbled(x) -> Truck(x, alene))\nnot Bilabiate(alene) -> Medicinal(alene)\nnot Truck(theo, yvonne) -> not Truck(yvonne, theo)\nforall x (Manicure(x, alene) and Truck(x, theo) -> Annihilate(alene, yvonne))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, theo) -> Manicure(x, alene))\nforall x (Manicure(x, alene) -> Manicure(x, theo))\n\nnot Annihilate(alene, yvonne)\n\nforall x (Manicure(x, alene) and Truck(x, theo) -> Annihilate(alene, yvonne)) <- forall x (Annihilate(x, theo) -> Manicure(x, alene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The boyd is uncomplete. The violante glass the boyd. The michele dehumanise the boyd. If something is viewable and catkinate then it dehumanise the michele. If the michele is not unwebbed then the michele is enhancive. If the boyd does not need the violante then the violante does not need the boyd. If something understate the michele and it dehumanise the boyd then the michele glass the violante. If something glass the boyd then it understate the michele. If something understate the michele then it understate the boyd. The michele understate the boyd.", "logic": "\nUncomplete(boyd)\nGlass(violante, boyd)\nDehumanise(michele, boyd)\nforall x (Viewable(x) and Catkinate(x) -> Dehumanise(x, michele))\nnot Unwebbed(michele) -> Enhancive(michele)\nnot Dehumanise(boyd, violante) -> not Dehumanise(violante, boyd)\nforall x (Understate(x, michele) and Dehumanise(x, boyd) -> Glass(michele, violante))\nforall x (Glass(x, boyd) -> Understate(x, michele))\nforall x (Understate(x, michele) -> Understate(x, boyd))\n\nUnderstate(michele, boyd)\n\nforall x (Understate(x, michele) -> Understate(x, boyd)) <- forall x (Glass(x, boyd) -> Understate(x, michele)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The flower is bowleg. The elnore turf the flower. The see meow the flower. If something is piscatory and obtainable then it meow the see. If the see is not deformed then the see is filmed. If the flower does not need the elnore then the elnore does not need the flower. If something annex the see and it meow the flower then the see turf the elnore. If something turf the flower then it annex the see. If something annex the see then it annex the flower. The see does not eat the see.", "logic": "\nBowleg(flower)\nTurf(elnore, flower)\nMeow(see, flower)\nforall x (Piscatory(x) and Obtainable(x) -> Meow(x, see))\nnot Deformed(see) -> Filmed(see)\nnot Meow(flower, elnore) -> not Meow(elnore, flower)\nforall x (Annex(x, see) and Meow(x, flower) -> Turf(see, elnore))\nforall x (Turf(x, flower) -> Annex(x, see))\nforall x (Annex(x, see) -> Annex(x, flower))\n\nnot Annex(see, see)\n\nforall x (Turf(x, flower) -> Annex(x, see)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The marina is vulpine. The talia inculpate the marina. The willis spearhead the marina. If something is amoeban and scurvy then it spearhead the willis. If the willis is not overmodest then the willis is disciform. If the marina does not need the talia then the talia does not need the marina. If something shrivel the willis and it spearhead the marina then the willis inculpate the talia. If something inculpate the marina then it shrivel the willis. If something shrivel the willis then it shrivel the marina. The willis is vulpine.", "logic": "\nVulpine(marina)\nInculpate(talia, marina)\nSpearhead(willis, marina)\nforall x (Amoeban(x) and Scurvy(x) -> Spearhead(x, willis))\nnot Overmodest(willis) -> Disciform(willis)\nnot Spearhead(marina, talia) -> not Spearhead(talia, marina)\nforall x (Shrivel(x, willis) and Spearhead(x, marina) -> Inculpate(willis, talia))\nforall x (Inculpate(x, marina) -> Shrivel(x, willis))\nforall x (Shrivel(x, willis) -> Shrivel(x, marina))\n\nVulpine(willis)\n\nVulpine(willis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The virginie is atrial. The emil ebonize the virginie. The rob mosey the virginie. If something is disloyal and unreliable then it mosey the rob. If the rob is not melanesian then the rob is antennal. If the virginie does not need the emil then the emil does not need the virginie. If something hull the rob and it mosey the virginie then the rob ebonize the emil. If something ebonize the virginie then it hull the rob. If something hull the rob then it hull the virginie. The virginie is not antennal.", "logic": "\nAtrial(virginie)\nEbonize(emil, virginie)\nMosey(rob, virginie)\nforall x (Disloyal(x) and Unreliable(x) -> Mosey(x, rob))\nnot Melanesian(rob) -> Antennal(rob)\nnot Mosey(virginie, emil) -> not Mosey(emil, virginie)\nforall x (Hull(x, rob) and Mosey(x, virginie) -> Ebonize(rob, emil))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, virginie) -> Hull(x, rob))\nforall x (Hull(x, rob) -> Hull(x, virginie))\n\nnot Antennal(virginie)\n\nnot Antennal(virginie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The shanon is exilic. The trisha gradate the shanon. The nan introvert the shanon. If something is winged and debonnaire then it introvert the nan. If the nan is not sorbed then the nan is blastular. If the shanon does not need the trisha then the trisha does not need the shanon. If something pray the nan and it introvert the shanon then the nan gradate the trisha. If something gradate the shanon then it pray the nan. If something pray the nan then it pray the shanon. The trisha is debonnaire.", "logic": "\nExilic(shanon)\nGradate(trisha, shanon)\nIntrovert(nan, shanon)\nforall x (Winged(x) and Debonnaire(x) -> Introvert(x, nan))\nnot Sorbed(nan) -> Blastular(nan)\nnot Introvert(shanon, trisha) -> not Introvert(trisha, shanon)\nforall x (Pray(x, nan) and Introvert(x, shanon) -> Gradate(nan, trisha))\nforall x (Gradate(x, shanon) -> Pray(x, nan))\nforall x (Pray(x, nan) -> Pray(x, shanon))\n\nDebonnaire(trisha)\n\nDebonnaire(trisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-822"} {"premises": "The hilton is pliant. The yolane alchemise the korella. The yolane is pliant. The yolane is pederastic. The yolane is romanic. The korella alchemise the hilton. The korella yawp the yolane. If something alchemise the korella then it is vulnerable. If the yolane is vulnerable and the yolane alchemise the korella then the korella yawp the hilton. All pliant things are hooflike. The yolane is pederastic.", "logic": "\nPliant(hilton)\nAlchemise(yolane, korella)\nPliant(yolane)\nPederastic(yolane)\nRomanic(yolane)\nAlchemise(korella, hilton)\nYawp(korella, yolane)\nforall x (Alchemise(x, korella) -> Vulnerable(x))\nVulnerable(yolane) and Alchemise(yolane, korella) -> Yawp(korella, hilton)\nforall x (Pliant(x) -> Hooflike(x))\n\nPederastic(yolane)\n\ntherefore Pederastic(yolane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The stuart is essene. The teresita ruffle the fran. The teresita is essene. The teresita is lenient. The teresita is noduled. The fran ruffle the stuart. The fran rupture the teresita. If something ruffle the fran then it is countable. If the teresita is countable and the teresita ruffle the fran then the fran rupture the stuart. All essene things are alacritous. The teresita is not lenient.", "logic": "\nEssene(stuart)\nRuffle(teresita, fran)\nEssene(teresita)\nLenient(teresita)\nNoduled(teresita)\nRuffle(fran, stuart)\nRupture(fran, teresita)\nforall x (Ruffle(x, fran) -> Countable(x))\nCountable(teresita) and Ruffle(teresita, fran) -> Rupture(fran, stuart)\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Alacritous(x))\n\nnot Lenient(teresita)\n\ntherefore Lenient(teresita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The etta is premiere. The rickard bomb the kayle. The rickard is premiere. The rickard is briary. The rickard is sulphurous. The kayle bomb the etta. The kayle felicitate the rickard. If something bomb the kayle then it is worse. If the rickard is worse and the rickard bomb the kayle then the kayle felicitate the etta. All premiere things are riblike. The etta is riblike.", "logic": "\nPremiere(etta)\nBomb(rickard, kayle)\nPremiere(rickard)\nBriary(rickard)\nSulphurous(rickard)\nBomb(kayle, etta)\nFelicitate(kayle, rickard)\nforall x (Bomb(x, kayle) -> Worse(x))\nWorse(rickard) and Bomb(rickard, kayle) -> Felicitate(kayle, etta)\nforall x (Premiere(x) -> Riblike(x))\n\nRiblike(etta)\n\nPremiere(etta) and forall x (Premiere(x) -> Riblike(x)) -> therefore Riblike(etta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The lida is rigorous. The agretha lend the sherlocke. The agretha is rigorous. The agretha is trembling. The agretha is roiled. The sherlocke lend the lida. The sherlocke disunify the agretha. If something lend the sherlocke then it is disrupted. If the agretha is disrupted and the agretha lend the sherlocke then the sherlocke disunify the lida. All rigorous things are glycogenic. The agretha is not glycogenic.", "logic": "\nRigorous(lida)\nLend(agretha, sherlocke)\nRigorous(agretha)\nTrembling(agretha)\nRoiled(agretha)\nLend(sherlocke, lida)\nDisunify(sherlocke, agretha)\nforall x (Lend(x, sherlocke) -> Disrupted(x))\nDisrupted(agretha) and Lend(agretha, sherlocke) -> Disunify(sherlocke, lida)\nforall x (Rigorous(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\n\nnot Glycogenic(agretha)\n\nRigorous(agretha) and forall x (Rigorous(x) -> Glycogenic(x)) -> therefore Glycogenic(agretha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The elmer is mural. The dew castrate the lilias. The dew is mural. The dew is deserving. The dew is curvy. The lilias castrate the elmer. The lilias backhand the dew. If something castrate the lilias then it is completed. If the dew is completed and the dew castrate the lilias then the lilias backhand the elmer. All mural things are gingery. The lilias backhand the elmer.", "logic": "\nMural(elmer)\nCastrate(dew, lilias)\nMural(dew)\nDeserving(dew)\nCurvy(dew)\nCastrate(lilias, elmer)\nBackhand(lilias, dew)\nforall x (Castrate(x, lilias) -> Completed(x))\nCompleted(dew) and Castrate(dew, lilias) -> Backhand(lilias, elmer)\nforall x (Mural(x) -> Gingery(x))\n\nBackhand(lilias, elmer)\n\nCastrate(dew, lilias) and forall x (Castrate(x, lilias) -> Completed(x)) -> therefore Completed(dew) Completed(dew) and Castrate(dew, lilias) and Completed(dew) and Castrate(dew, lilias) -> Backhand(lilias, elmer) -> therefore Backhand(lilias, elmer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The shlomo is warped. The rodolph commingle the maisey. The rodolph is warped. The rodolph is another. The rodolph is heatable. The maisey commingle the shlomo. The maisey footle the rodolph. If something commingle the maisey then it is azotic. If the rodolph is azotic and the rodolph commingle the maisey then the maisey footle the shlomo. All warped things are mediaeval. The maisey does not like the shlomo.", "logic": "\nWarped(shlomo)\nCommingle(rodolph, maisey)\nWarped(rodolph)\nAnother(rodolph)\nHeatable(rodolph)\nCommingle(maisey, shlomo)\nFootle(maisey, rodolph)\nforall x (Commingle(x, maisey) -> Azotic(x))\nAzotic(rodolph) and Commingle(rodolph, maisey) -> Footle(maisey, shlomo)\nforall x (Warped(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\n\nnot Footle(maisey, shlomo)\n\nCommingle(rodolph, maisey) and forall x (Commingle(x, maisey) -> Azotic(x)) -> therefore Azotic(rodolph) Azotic(rodolph) and Commingle(rodolph, maisey) and Azotic(rodolph) and Commingle(rodolph, maisey) -> Footle(maisey, shlomo) -> therefore Footle(maisey, shlomo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The marna is scentless. The anya slaughter the rab. The anya is scentless. The anya is modifiable. The anya is vapourific. The rab slaughter the marna. The rab stash the anya. If something slaughter the rab then it is unpeaceful. If the anya is unpeaceful and the anya slaughter the rab then the rab stash the marna. All scentless things are polluted. The rab is not unpeaceful.", "logic": "\nScentless(marna)\nSlaughter(anya, rab)\nScentless(anya)\nModifiable(anya)\nVapourific(anya)\nSlaughter(rab, marna)\nStash(rab, anya)\nforall x (Slaughter(x, rab) -> Unpeaceful(x))\nUnpeaceful(anya) and Slaughter(anya, rab) -> Stash(rab, marna)\nforall x (Scentless(x) -> Polluted(x))\n\nnot Unpeaceful(rab)\n\nforall x (Slaughter(x, rab) -> Unpeaceful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The tillie is drifting. The teodorico choose the jere. The teodorico is drifting. The teodorico is doric. The teodorico is tongueless. The jere choose the tillie. The jere squish the teodorico. If something choose the jere then it is bleached. If the teodorico is bleached and the teodorico choose the jere then the jere squish the tillie. All drifting things are summary. The tillie is bleached.", "logic": "\nDrifting(tillie)\nChoose(teodorico, jere)\nDrifting(teodorico)\nDoric(teodorico)\nTongueless(teodorico)\nChoose(jere, tillie)\nSquish(jere, teodorico)\nforall x (Choose(x, jere) -> Bleached(x))\nBleached(teodorico) and Choose(teodorico, jere) -> Squish(jere, tillie)\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> Summary(x))\n\nBleached(tillie)\n\nforall x (Choose(x, jere) -> Bleached(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The aindrea is tweedy. The bren tinct the darya. The bren is tweedy. The bren is styptic. The bren is anginal. The darya tinct the aindrea. The darya lease the bren. If something tinct the darya then it is pudendal. If the bren is pudendal and the bren tinct the darya then the darya lease the aindrea. All tweedy things are hospitable. The darya is not hospitable.", "logic": "\nTweedy(aindrea)\nTinct(bren, darya)\nTweedy(bren)\nStyptic(bren)\nAnginal(bren)\nTinct(darya, aindrea)\nLease(darya, bren)\nforall x (Tinct(x, darya) -> Pudendal(x))\nPudendal(bren) and Tinct(bren, darya) -> Lease(darya, aindrea)\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Hospitable(x))\n\nnot Hospitable(darya)\n\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Hospitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The hadleigh is buffoonish. The susette stand the rosamond. The susette is buffoonish. The susette is flavorsome. The susette is tried. The rosamond stand the hadleigh. The rosamond subsume the susette. If something stand the rosamond then it is unstrung. If the susette is unstrung and the susette stand the rosamond then the rosamond subsume the hadleigh. All buffoonish things are dozen. The susette visits the hadleigh.", "logic": "\nBuffoonish(hadleigh)\nStand(susette, rosamond)\nBuffoonish(susette)\nFlavorsome(susette)\nTried(susette)\nStand(rosamond, hadleigh)\nSubsume(rosamond, susette)\nforall x (Stand(x, rosamond) -> Unstrung(x))\nUnstrung(susette) and Stand(susette, rosamond) -> Subsume(rosamond, hadleigh)\nforall x (Buffoonish(x) -> Dozen(x))\n\nVisits(susette, hadleigh)\n\nVisits(susette, hadleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The ozzie is licenced. The ebonee roister the paola. The ebonee is licenced. The ebonee is onomastic. The ebonee is sleepy. The paola roister the ozzie. The paola kayak the ebonee. If something roister the paola then it is dirty. If the ebonee is dirty and the ebonee roister the paola then the paola kayak the ozzie. All licenced things are unmelted. The ebonee does not visit the ebonee.", "logic": "\nLicenced(ozzie)\nRoister(ebonee, paola)\nLicenced(ebonee)\nOnomastic(ebonee)\nSleepy(ebonee)\nRoister(paola, ozzie)\nKayak(paola, ebonee)\nforall x (Roister(x, paola) -> Dirty(x))\nDirty(ebonee) and Roister(ebonee, paola) -> Kayak(paola, ozzie)\nforall x (Licenced(x) -> Unmelted(x))\n\nnot Visits(ebonee, ebonee)\n\nnot Visits(ebonee, ebonee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The kandy is statant. The abagael nock the devan. The abagael is statant. The abagael is purifying. The abagael is winglike. The devan nock the kandy. The devan cite the abagael. If something nock the devan then it is teased. If the abagael is teased and the abagael nock the devan then the devan cite the kandy. All statant things are cumuliform. The kandy is winglike.", "logic": "\nStatant(kandy)\nNock(abagael, devan)\nStatant(abagael)\nPurifying(abagael)\nWinglike(abagael)\nNock(devan, kandy)\nCite(devan, abagael)\nforall x (Nock(x, devan) -> Teased(x))\nTeased(abagael) and Nock(abagael, devan) -> Cite(devan, kandy)\nforall x (Statant(x) -> Cumuliform(x))\n\nWinglike(kandy)\n\nWinglike(kandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-55"} {"premises": "The corabel misspend the cassy. The corabel is very. The corabel is hexagonal. The corabel is ametabolic. The corabel is stative. The corabel fare the cassy. The corabel shrinkwrap the cassy. The cassy is hexagonal. The cassy is ametabolic. The cassy is stative. The cassy fare the corabel. The cassy shrinkwrap the corabel. If something is preanal then it fare the cassy. If something misspend the cassy and the cassy fare the corabel then the cassy is preanal. The cassy fare the corabel.", "logic": "\nMisspend(corabel, cassy)\nVery(corabel)\nHexagonal(corabel)\nAmetabolic(corabel)\nStative(corabel)\nFare(corabel, cassy)\nShrinkwrap(corabel, cassy)\nHexagonal(cassy)\nAmetabolic(cassy)\nStative(cassy)\nFare(cassy, corabel)\nShrinkwrap(cassy, corabel)\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Fare(x, cassy))\nforall x (Misspend(x, cassy) and Fare(cassy, corabel) -> Preanal(cassy))\n\nFare(cassy, corabel)\n\ntherefore Fare(cassy, corabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The obadias tube the merrilee. The obadias is scarce. The obadias is staring. The obadias is twelve. The obadias is diverted. The obadias raven the merrilee. The obadias suffer the merrilee. The merrilee is staring. The merrilee is twelve. The merrilee is diverted. The merrilee raven the obadias. The merrilee suffer the obadias. If something is diffusing then it raven the merrilee. If something tube the merrilee and the merrilee raven the obadias then the merrilee is diffusing. The obadias does not need the merrilee.", "logic": "\nTube(obadias, merrilee)\nScarce(obadias)\nStaring(obadias)\nTwelve(obadias)\nDiverted(obadias)\nRaven(obadias, merrilee)\nSuffer(obadias, merrilee)\nStaring(merrilee)\nTwelve(merrilee)\nDiverted(merrilee)\nRaven(merrilee, obadias)\nSuffer(merrilee, obadias)\nforall x (Diffusing(x) -> Raven(x, merrilee))\nforall x (Tube(x, merrilee) and Raven(merrilee, obadias) -> Diffusing(merrilee))\n\nnot Suffer(obadias, merrilee)\n\ntherefore Suffer(obadias, merrilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The bogdan trounce the wylie. The bogdan is scurfy. The bogdan is mitral. The bogdan is clinched. The bogdan is duodecimal. The bogdan forfend the wylie. The bogdan vote the wylie. The wylie is mitral. The wylie is clinched. The wylie is duodecimal. The wylie forfend the bogdan. The wylie vote the bogdan. If something is oleaginous then it forfend the wylie. If something trounce the wylie and the wylie forfend the bogdan then the wylie is oleaginous. The wylie is oleaginous.", "logic": "\nTrounce(bogdan, wylie)\nScurfy(bogdan)\nMitral(bogdan)\nClinched(bogdan)\nDuodecimal(bogdan)\nForfend(bogdan, wylie)\nVote(bogdan, wylie)\nMitral(wylie)\nClinched(wylie)\nDuodecimal(wylie)\nForfend(wylie, bogdan)\nVote(wylie, bogdan)\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Forfend(x, wylie))\nforall x (Trounce(x, wylie) and Forfend(wylie, bogdan) -> Oleaginous(wylie))\n\nOleaginous(wylie)\n\nTrounce(bogdan, wylie) and Forfend(wylie, bogdan) and forall x (Trounce(x, wylie) and Forfend(wylie, bogdan) -> Oleaginous(wylie)) -> therefore Oleaginous(wylie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The mitchell abstain the georgeta. The mitchell is subjective. The mitchell is great. The mitchell is zenithal. The mitchell is yelled. The mitchell mainline the georgeta. The mitchell incise the georgeta. The georgeta is great. The georgeta is zenithal. The georgeta is yelled. The georgeta mainline the mitchell. The georgeta incise the mitchell. If something is large then it mainline the georgeta. If something abstain the georgeta and the georgeta mainline the mitchell then the georgeta is large. The georgeta is not large.", "logic": "\nAbstain(mitchell, georgeta)\nSubjective(mitchell)\nGreat(mitchell)\nZenithal(mitchell)\nYelled(mitchell)\nMainline(mitchell, georgeta)\nIncise(mitchell, georgeta)\nGreat(georgeta)\nZenithal(georgeta)\nYelled(georgeta)\nMainline(georgeta, mitchell)\nIncise(georgeta, mitchell)\nforall x (Large(x) -> Mainline(x, georgeta))\nforall x (Abstain(x, georgeta) and Mainline(georgeta, mitchell) -> Large(georgeta))\n\nnot Large(georgeta)\n\nAbstain(mitchell, georgeta) and Mainline(georgeta, mitchell) and forall x (Abstain(x, georgeta) and Mainline(georgeta, mitchell) -> Large(georgeta)) -> therefore Large(georgeta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The umeko cakewalk the edward. The umeko is refractile. The umeko is angulate. The umeko is polar. The umeko is antifungal. The umeko sulfur the edward. The umeko dish the edward. The edward is angulate. The edward is polar. The edward is antifungal. The edward sulfur the umeko. The edward dish the umeko. If something is benevolent then it sulfur the edward. If something cakewalk the edward and the edward sulfur the umeko then the edward is benevolent. The edward sulfur the edward.", "logic": "\nCakewalk(umeko, edward)\nRefractile(umeko)\nAngulate(umeko)\nPolar(umeko)\nAntifungal(umeko)\nSulfur(umeko, edward)\nDish(umeko, edward)\nAngulate(edward)\nPolar(edward)\nAntifungal(edward)\nSulfur(edward, umeko)\nDish(edward, umeko)\nforall x (Benevolent(x) -> Sulfur(x, edward))\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, edward) and Sulfur(edward, umeko) -> Benevolent(edward))\n\nSulfur(edward, edward)\n\nCakewalk(umeko, edward) and Sulfur(edward, umeko) and forall x (Cakewalk(x, edward) and Sulfur(edward, umeko) -> Benevolent(edward)) -> therefore Benevolent(edward) Benevolent(edward) and forall x (Benevolent(x) -> Sulfur(x, edward)) -> therefore Sulfur(edward, edward)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The delly background the salomo. The delly is unmannerly. The delly is deterrent. The delly is willing. The delly is anatropous. The delly segment the salomo. The delly agnize the salomo. The salomo is deterrent. The salomo is willing. The salomo is anatropous. The salomo segment the delly. The salomo agnize the delly. If something is unhatched then it segment the salomo. If something background the salomo and the salomo segment the delly then the salomo is unhatched. The salomo does not like the salomo.", "logic": "\nBackground(delly, salomo)\nUnmannerly(delly)\nDeterrent(delly)\nWilling(delly)\nAnatropous(delly)\nSegment(delly, salomo)\nAgnize(delly, salomo)\nDeterrent(salomo)\nWilling(salomo)\nAnatropous(salomo)\nSegment(salomo, delly)\nAgnize(salomo, delly)\nforall x (Unhatched(x) -> Segment(x, salomo))\nforall x (Background(x, salomo) and Segment(salomo, delly) -> Unhatched(salomo))\n\nnot Segment(salomo, salomo)\n\nBackground(delly, salomo) and Segment(salomo, delly) and forall x (Background(x, salomo) and Segment(salomo, delly) -> Unhatched(salomo)) -> therefore Unhatched(salomo) Unhatched(salomo) and forall x (Unhatched(x) -> Segment(x, salomo)) -> therefore Segment(salomo, salomo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The barrie sermonise the dominique. The barrie is amusive. The barrie is exogenous. The barrie is provoking. The barrie is flyaway. The barrie lionise the dominique. The barrie mislay the dominique. The dominique is exogenous. The dominique is provoking. The dominique is flyaway. The dominique lionise the barrie. The dominique mislay the barrie. If something is supported then it lionise the dominique. If something sermonise the dominique and the dominique lionise the barrie then the dominique is supported. The dominique is not amusive.", "logic": "\nSermonise(barrie, dominique)\nAmusive(barrie)\nExogenous(barrie)\nProvoking(barrie)\nFlyaway(barrie)\nLionise(barrie, dominique)\nMislay(barrie, dominique)\nExogenous(dominique)\nProvoking(dominique)\nFlyaway(dominique)\nLionise(dominique, barrie)\nMislay(dominique, barrie)\nforall x (Supported(x) -> Lionise(x, dominique))\nforall x (Sermonise(x, dominique) and Lionise(dominique, barrie) -> Supported(dominique))\n\nnot Amusive(dominique)\n\nnot Amusive(dominique) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The fredelia violate the federica. The fredelia is couchant. The fredelia is inherited. The fredelia is bivariate. The fredelia is shelfy. The fredelia camouflage the federica. The fredelia debug the federica. The federica is inherited. The federica is bivariate. The federica is shelfy. The federica camouflage the fredelia. The federica debug the fredelia. If something is calcitic then it camouflage the federica. If something violate the federica and the federica camouflage the fredelia then the federica is calcitic. The fredelia camouflage the fredelia.", "logic": "\nViolate(fredelia, federica)\nCouchant(fredelia)\nInherited(fredelia)\nBivariate(fredelia)\nShelfy(fredelia)\nCamouflage(fredelia, federica)\nDebug(fredelia, federica)\nInherited(federica)\nBivariate(federica)\nShelfy(federica)\nCamouflage(federica, fredelia)\nDebug(federica, fredelia)\nforall x (Calcitic(x) -> Camouflage(x, federica))\nforall x (Violate(x, federica) and Camouflage(federica, fredelia) -> Calcitic(federica))\n\nCamouflage(fredelia, fredelia)\n\nCamouflage(fredelia, fredelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The mair underlay the toni. The mair is frontal. The mair is philatelic. The mair is compound. The mair is perianal. The mair hand the toni. The mair chug the toni. The toni is philatelic. The toni is compound. The toni is perianal. The toni hand the mair. The toni chug the mair. If something is lovely then it hand the toni. If something underlay the toni and the toni hand the mair then the toni is lovely. The toni does not eat the mair.", "logic": "\nUnderlay(mair, toni)\nFrontal(mair)\nPhilatelic(mair)\nCompound(mair)\nPerianal(mair)\nHand(mair, toni)\nChug(mair, toni)\nPhilatelic(toni)\nCompound(toni)\nPerianal(toni)\nHand(toni, mair)\nChug(toni, mair)\nforall x (Lovely(x) -> Hand(x, toni))\nforall x (Underlay(x, toni) and Hand(toni, mair) -> Lovely(toni))\n\nnot Underlay(toni, mair)\n\nnot Underlay(toni, mair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The kris derestrict the reynold. The kris is leguminous. The kris is custodial. The kris is unbridled. The kris is impure. The kris resole the reynold. The kris tick the reynold. The reynold is custodial. The reynold is unbridled. The reynold is impure. The reynold resole the kris. The reynold tick the kris. If something is surreal then it resole the reynold. If something derestrict the reynold and the reynold resole the kris then the reynold is surreal. The kris derestrict the kris.", "logic": "\nDerestrict(kris, reynold)\nLeguminous(kris)\nCustodial(kris)\nUnbridled(kris)\nImpure(kris)\nResole(kris, reynold)\nTick(kris, reynold)\nCustodial(reynold)\nUnbridled(reynold)\nImpure(reynold)\nResole(reynold, kris)\nTick(reynold, kris)\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Resole(x, reynold))\nforall x (Derestrict(x, reynold) and Resole(reynold, kris) -> Surreal(reynold))\n\nDerestrict(kris, kris)\n\nDerestrict(kris, kris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The paloma baptize the lind. The paloma is deciphered. The paloma is chiasmal. The paloma is homostyled. The paloma is bronchitic. The paloma model the lind. The paloma gauge the lind. The lind is chiasmal. The lind is homostyled. The lind is bronchitic. The lind model the paloma. The lind gauge the paloma. If something is rostrate then it model the lind. If something baptize the lind and the lind model the paloma then the lind is rostrate. The lind does not eat the lind.", "logic": "\nBaptize(paloma, lind)\nDeciphered(paloma)\nChiasmal(paloma)\nHomostyled(paloma)\nBronchitic(paloma)\nModel(paloma, lind)\nGauge(paloma, lind)\nChiasmal(lind)\nHomostyled(lind)\nBronchitic(lind)\nModel(lind, paloma)\nGauge(lind, paloma)\nforall x (Rostrate(x) -> Model(x, lind))\nforall x (Baptize(x, lind) and Model(lind, paloma) -> Rostrate(lind))\n\nnot Baptize(lind, lind)\n\nnot Baptize(lind, lind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "The franklyn baronetize the wilmette. The franklyn is cheerful. The franklyn is deft. The franklyn is candid. The franklyn is undogmatic. The franklyn nuzzle the wilmette. The franklyn pacify the wilmette. The wilmette is deft. The wilmette is candid. The wilmette is undogmatic. The wilmette nuzzle the franklyn. The wilmette pacify the franklyn. If something is frolicsome then it nuzzle the wilmette. If something baronetize the wilmette and the wilmette nuzzle the franklyn then the wilmette is frolicsome. The wilmette pacify the wilmette.", "logic": "\nBaronetize(franklyn, wilmette)\nCheerful(franklyn)\nDeft(franklyn)\nCandid(franklyn)\nUndogmatic(franklyn)\nNuzzle(franklyn, wilmette)\nPacify(franklyn, wilmette)\nDeft(wilmette)\nCandid(wilmette)\nUndogmatic(wilmette)\nNuzzle(wilmette, franklyn)\nPacify(wilmette, franklyn)\nforall x (Frolicsome(x) -> Nuzzle(x, wilmette))\nforall x (Baronetize(x, wilmette) and Nuzzle(wilmette, franklyn) -> Frolicsome(wilmette))\n\nPacify(wilmette, wilmette)\n\nPacify(wilmette, wilmette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-834"} {"premises": "Ralina is stuck. Ralina is not nigerien. Perla is stuck. Perla is nigerien. Perla is thermic. Perla is cimmerian. Perla is not civilized. Gwenni is thermic. Gwenni is cimmerian. Gwenni is not civilized. Rochester is curvy. Rochester is satisfied. If Gwenni is cimmerian and Gwenni is civilized then Gwenni is thermic. All curvy things are satisfied. Green things are curvy. Rochester is curvy.", "logic": "\nStuck(ralina)\nnot Nigerien(ralina)\nStuck(perla)\nNigerien(perla)\nThermic(perla)\nCimmerian(perla)\nnot Civilized(perla)\nThermic(gwenni)\nCimmerian(gwenni)\nnot Civilized(gwenni)\nCurvy(rochester)\nSatisfied(rochester)\nCimmerian(gwenni) and Civilized(gwenni) -> Thermic(gwenni)\nforall x (Curvy(x) -> Satisfied(x))\nforall x (Nigerien(x) -> Curvy(x))\n\nCurvy(rochester)\n\ntherefore Curvy(rochester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Dewitt is middlemost. Dewitt is not quirky. Frannie is middlemost. Frannie is quirky. Frannie is devotional. Frannie is hotheaded. Frannie is not concealing. Chariot is devotional. Chariot is hotheaded. Chariot is not concealing. Kimmy is knightly. Kimmy is invitatory. If Chariot is hotheaded and Chariot is concealing then Chariot is devotional. All knightly things are invitatory. Green things are knightly. Kimmy is not knightly.", "logic": "\nMiddlemost(dewitt)\nnot Quirky(dewitt)\nMiddlemost(frannie)\nQuirky(frannie)\nDevotional(frannie)\nHotheaded(frannie)\nnot Concealing(frannie)\nDevotional(chariot)\nHotheaded(chariot)\nnot Concealing(chariot)\nKnightly(kimmy)\nInvitatory(kimmy)\nHotheaded(chariot) and Concealing(chariot) -> Devotional(chariot)\nforall x (Knightly(x) -> Invitatory(x))\nforall x (Quirky(x) -> Knightly(x))\n\nnot Knightly(kimmy)\n\ntherefore Knightly(kimmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Janifer is unguarded. Janifer is not hertzian. Hatty is unguarded. Hatty is hertzian. Hatty is triumphant. Hatty is roundabout. Hatty is not lustful. Rhonda is triumphant. Rhonda is roundabout. Rhonda is not lustful. Manuel is sterilised. Manuel is needless. If Rhonda is roundabout and Rhonda is lustful then Rhonda is triumphant. All sterilised things are needless. Green things are sterilised. Hatty is sterilised.", "logic": "\nUnguarded(janifer)\nnot Hertzian(janifer)\nUnguarded(hatty)\nHertzian(hatty)\nTriumphant(hatty)\nRoundabout(hatty)\nnot Lustful(hatty)\nTriumphant(rhonda)\nRoundabout(rhonda)\nnot Lustful(rhonda)\nSterilised(manuel)\nNeedless(manuel)\nRoundabout(rhonda) and Lustful(rhonda) -> Triumphant(rhonda)\nforall x (Sterilised(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Hertzian(x) -> Sterilised(x))\n\nSterilised(hatty)\n\nHertzian(hatty) and forall x (Hertzian(x) -> Sterilised(x)) -> therefore Sterilised(hatty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Barbabas is unromantic. Barbabas is not mediatory. Deerdre is unromantic. Deerdre is mediatory. Deerdre is devalued. Deerdre is vesicant. Deerdre is not chiasmatic. Juliana is devalued. Juliana is vesicant. Juliana is not chiasmatic. Renaldo is present. Renaldo is cutaneal. If Juliana is vesicant and Juliana is chiasmatic then Juliana is devalued. All present things are cutaneal. Green things are present. Deerdre is not present.", "logic": "\nUnromantic(barbabas)\nnot Mediatory(barbabas)\nUnromantic(deerdre)\nMediatory(deerdre)\nDevalued(deerdre)\nVesicant(deerdre)\nnot Chiasmatic(deerdre)\nDevalued(juliana)\nVesicant(juliana)\nnot Chiasmatic(juliana)\nPresent(renaldo)\nCutaneal(renaldo)\nVesicant(juliana) and Chiasmatic(juliana) -> Devalued(juliana)\nforall x (Present(x) -> Cutaneal(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Present(x))\n\nnot Present(deerdre)\n\nMediatory(deerdre) and forall x (Mediatory(x) -> Present(x)) -> therefore Present(deerdre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Alden is immaterial. Alden is not grave. Durante is immaterial. Durante is grave. Durante is prefrontal. Durante is outdoorsy. Durante is not wayward. Cindelyn is prefrontal. Cindelyn is outdoorsy. Cindelyn is not wayward. Phillipp is pleasing. Phillipp is algonquian. If Cindelyn is outdoorsy and Cindelyn is wayward then Cindelyn is prefrontal. All pleasing things are algonquian. Green things are pleasing. Durante is algonquian.", "logic": "\nImmaterial(alden)\nnot Grave(alden)\nImmaterial(durante)\nGrave(durante)\nPrefrontal(durante)\nOutdoorsy(durante)\nnot Wayward(durante)\nPrefrontal(cindelyn)\nOutdoorsy(cindelyn)\nnot Wayward(cindelyn)\nPleasing(phillipp)\nAlgonquian(phillipp)\nOutdoorsy(cindelyn) and Wayward(cindelyn) -> Prefrontal(cindelyn)\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Algonquian(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Pleasing(x))\n\nAlgonquian(durante)\n\nGrave(durante) and forall x (Grave(x) -> Pleasing(x)) -> therefore Pleasing(durante) Pleasing(durante) and forall x (Pleasing(x) -> Algonquian(x)) -> therefore Algonquian(durante)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Lynett is contextual. Lynett is not historical. Tracey is contextual. Tracey is historical. Tracey is redemptive. Tracey is sarcosomal. Tracey is not patronymic. Husain is redemptive. Husain is sarcosomal. Husain is not patronymic. Lizabeth is stifled. Lizabeth is audenesque. If Husain is sarcosomal and Husain is patronymic then Husain is redemptive. All stifled things are audenesque. Green things are stifled. Tracey is not audenesque.", "logic": "\nContextual(lynett)\nnot Historical(lynett)\nContextual(tracey)\nHistorical(tracey)\nRedemptive(tracey)\nSarcosomal(tracey)\nnot Patronymic(tracey)\nRedemptive(husain)\nSarcosomal(husain)\nnot Patronymic(husain)\nStifled(lizabeth)\nAudenesque(lizabeth)\nSarcosomal(husain) and Patronymic(husain) -> Redemptive(husain)\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Audenesque(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) -> Stifled(x))\n\nnot Audenesque(tracey)\n\nHistorical(tracey) and forall x (Historical(x) -> Stifled(x)) -> therefore Stifled(tracey) Stifled(tracey) and forall x (Stifled(x) -> Audenesque(x)) -> therefore Audenesque(tracey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Reinhard is expiatory. Reinhard is not iodinated. Billie is expiatory. Billie is iodinated. Billie is animating. Billie is credulous. Billie is not somali. Sheila is animating. Sheila is credulous. Sheila is not somali. Meggan is unbaptised. Meggan is chemic. If Sheila is credulous and Sheila is somali then Sheila is animating. All unbaptised things are chemic. Green things are unbaptised. Sheila is not chemic.", "logic": "\nExpiatory(reinhard)\nnot Iodinated(reinhard)\nExpiatory(billie)\nIodinated(billie)\nAnimating(billie)\nCredulous(billie)\nnot Somali(billie)\nAnimating(sheila)\nCredulous(sheila)\nnot Somali(sheila)\nUnbaptised(meggan)\nChemic(meggan)\nCredulous(sheila) and Somali(sheila) -> Animating(sheila)\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Chemic(x))\nforall x (Iodinated(x) -> Unbaptised(x))\n\nnot Chemic(sheila)\n\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Chemic(x)) <- forall x (Iodinated(x) -> Unbaptised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Atlanta is polyvalent. Atlanta is not intolerant. Queenie is polyvalent. Queenie is intolerant. Queenie is pseudo. Queenie is regulation. Queenie is not stock. Ina is pseudo. Ina is regulation. Ina is not stock. Grover is sadistic. Grover is gaunt. If Ina is regulation and Ina is stock then Ina is pseudo. All sadistic things are gaunt. Green things are sadistic. Atlanta is sadistic.", "logic": "\nPolyvalent(atlanta)\nnot Intolerant(atlanta)\nPolyvalent(queenie)\nIntolerant(queenie)\nPseudo(queenie)\nRegulation(queenie)\nnot Stock(queenie)\nPseudo(ina)\nRegulation(ina)\nnot Stock(ina)\nSadistic(grover)\nGaunt(grover)\nRegulation(ina) and Stock(ina) -> Pseudo(ina)\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Sadistic(x))\n\nSadistic(atlanta)\n\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Sadistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Golda is sheared. Golda is not pustulate. Leonhard is sheared. Leonhard is pustulate. Leonhard is unhumorous. Leonhard is azotic. Leonhard is not exuvial. Mira is unhumorous. Mira is azotic. Mira is not exuvial. Mariya is glowering. Mariya is gaelic. If Mira is azotic and Mira is exuvial then Mira is unhumorous. All glowering things are gaelic. Green things are glowering. Golda is not gaelic.", "logic": "\nSheared(golda)\nnot Pustulate(golda)\nSheared(leonhard)\nPustulate(leonhard)\nUnhumorous(leonhard)\nAzotic(leonhard)\nnot Exuvial(leonhard)\nUnhumorous(mira)\nAzotic(mira)\nnot Exuvial(mira)\nGlowering(mariya)\nGaelic(mariya)\nAzotic(mira) and Exuvial(mira) -> Unhumorous(mira)\nforall x (Glowering(x) -> Gaelic(x))\nforall x (Pustulate(x) -> Glowering(x))\n\nnot Gaelic(golda)\n\nforall x (Glowering(x) -> Gaelic(x)) <- forall x (Pustulate(x) -> Glowering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Thornton is schematic. Thornton is not coroneted. Kalie is schematic. Kalie is coroneted. Kalie is unkindled. Kalie is unbound. Kalie is not triennial. Hakeem is unkindled. Hakeem is unbound. Hakeem is not triennial. Peyter is sardonic. Peyter is amoebous. If Hakeem is unbound and Hakeem is triennial then Hakeem is unkindled. All sardonic things are amoebous. Green things are sardonic. Peyter is schematic.", "logic": "\nSchematic(thornton)\nnot Coroneted(thornton)\nSchematic(kalie)\nCoroneted(kalie)\nUnkindled(kalie)\nUnbound(kalie)\nnot Triennial(kalie)\nUnkindled(hakeem)\nUnbound(hakeem)\nnot Triennial(hakeem)\nSardonic(peyter)\nAmoebous(peyter)\nUnbound(hakeem) and Triennial(hakeem) -> Unkindled(hakeem)\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Amoebous(x))\nforall x (Coroneted(x) -> Sardonic(x))\n\nSchematic(peyter)\n\nSchematic(peyter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Melly is sarcosomal. Melly is not isothermic. Darell is sarcosomal. Darell is isothermic. Darell is polluted. Darell is choky. Darell is not cadaveric. Yancey is polluted. Yancey is choky. Yancey is not cadaveric. Jonell is sterling. Jonell is tried. If Yancey is choky and Yancey is cadaveric then Yancey is polluted. All sterling things are tried. Green things are sterling. Jonell is not isothermic.", "logic": "\nSarcosomal(melly)\nnot Isothermic(melly)\nSarcosomal(darell)\nIsothermic(darell)\nPolluted(darell)\nChoky(darell)\nnot Cadaveric(darell)\nPolluted(yancey)\nChoky(yancey)\nnot Cadaveric(yancey)\nSterling(jonell)\nTried(jonell)\nChoky(yancey) and Cadaveric(yancey) -> Polluted(yancey)\nforall x (Sterling(x) -> Tried(x))\nforall x (Isothermic(x) -> Sterling(x))\n\nnot Isothermic(jonell)\n\nnot Isothermic(jonell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Ericka is eighty. Ericka is not feeble. Sherilyn is eighty. Sherilyn is feeble. Sherilyn is potbellied. Sherilyn is postmortem. Sherilyn is not maddened. Merridie is potbellied. Merridie is postmortem. Merridie is not maddened. Raynor is mortuary. Raynor is aecial. If Merridie is postmortem and Merridie is maddened then Merridie is potbellied. All mortuary things are aecial. Green things are mortuary. Ericka is potbellied.", "logic": "\nEighty(ericka)\nnot Feeble(ericka)\nEighty(sherilyn)\nFeeble(sherilyn)\nPotbellied(sherilyn)\nPostmortem(sherilyn)\nnot Maddened(sherilyn)\nPotbellied(merridie)\nPostmortem(merridie)\nnot Maddened(merridie)\nMortuary(raynor)\nAecial(raynor)\nPostmortem(merridie) and Maddened(merridie) -> Potbellied(merridie)\nforall x (Mortuary(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Feeble(x) -> Mortuary(x))\n\nPotbellied(ericka)\n\nPotbellied(ericka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1690"} {"premises": "Amabelle is tricolor. Celene is american. Gwennie is moderne. All unpeopled, bootless things are tricolor. All tricolor things are moderne. If something is american then it is moderne. Round, american things are bootless. Kind, moderne things are not bootless. All honeylike things are american. Gwennie is moderne.", "logic": "\nTricolor(amabelle)\nAmerican(celene)\nModerne(gwennie)\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) and Bootless(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Tricolor(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (American(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) and American(x) -> Bootless(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) and Moderne(x) -> not Bootless(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> American(x))\n\nModerne(gwennie)\n\ntherefore Moderne(gwennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Johan is luxurious. Dimitry is avocado. Emmeline is osseous. All frugal, impetuous things are luxurious. All luxurious things are osseous. If something is avocado then it is osseous. Round, avocado things are impetuous. Kind, osseous things are not impetuous. All developed things are avocado. Emmeline is not osseous.", "logic": "\nLuxurious(johan)\nAvocado(dimitry)\nOsseous(emmeline)\nforall x (Frugal(x) and Impetuous(x) -> Luxurious(x))\nforall x (Luxurious(x) -> Osseous(x))\nforall x (Avocado(x) -> Osseous(x))\nforall x (Osseous(x) and Avocado(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Frugal(x) and Osseous(x) -> not Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Developed(x) -> Avocado(x))\n\nnot Osseous(emmeline)\n\ntherefore Osseous(emmeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Mary is somatic. Marji is tolerable. Gilly is undersexed. All goethean, trilled things are somatic. All somatic things are undersexed. If something is tolerable then it is undersexed. Round, tolerable things are trilled. Kind, undersexed things are not trilled. All leafed things are tolerable. Marji is undersexed.", "logic": "\nSomatic(mary)\nTolerable(marji)\nUndersexed(gilly)\nforall x (Goethean(x) and Trilled(x) -> Somatic(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) -> Undersexed(x))\nforall x (Tolerable(x) -> Undersexed(x))\nforall x (Undersexed(x) and Tolerable(x) -> Trilled(x))\nforall x (Goethean(x) and Undersexed(x) -> not Trilled(x))\nforall x (Leafed(x) -> Tolerable(x))\n\nUndersexed(marji)\n\nTolerable(marji) and forall x (Tolerable(x) -> Undersexed(x)) -> therefore Undersexed(marji)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Lillis is skilled. Myrilla is selective. Ashleigh is widowed. All glooming, ungrudging things are skilled. All skilled things are widowed. If something is selective then it is widowed. Round, selective things are ungrudging. Kind, widowed things are not ungrudging. All otiose things are selective. Lillis is not widowed.", "logic": "\nSkilled(lillis)\nSelective(myrilla)\nWidowed(ashleigh)\nforall x (Glooming(x) and Ungrudging(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Widowed(x))\nforall x (Selective(x) -> Widowed(x))\nforall x (Widowed(x) and Selective(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\nforall x (Glooming(x) and Widowed(x) -> not Ungrudging(x))\nforall x (Otiose(x) -> Selective(x))\n\nnot Widowed(lillis)\n\nSkilled(lillis) and forall x (Skilled(x) -> Widowed(x)) -> therefore Widowed(lillis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Wilek is spoilable. Caroleen is nontoxic. Weston is erythroid. All indigo, cxxv things are spoilable. All spoilable things are erythroid. If something is nontoxic then it is erythroid. Round, nontoxic things are cxxv. Kind, erythroid things are not cxxv. All undershot things are nontoxic. Caroleen is cxxv.", "logic": "\nSpoilable(wilek)\nNontoxic(caroleen)\nErythroid(weston)\nforall x (Indigo(x) and Cxxv(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Erythroid(x))\nforall x (Nontoxic(x) -> Erythroid(x))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) and Nontoxic(x) -> Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Indigo(x) and Erythroid(x) -> not Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> Nontoxic(x))\n\nCxxv(caroleen)\n\nNontoxic(caroleen) and forall x (Nontoxic(x) -> Erythroid(x)) -> therefore Erythroid(caroleen) Erythroid(caroleen) and Nontoxic(caroleen) and forall x (Erythroid(x) and Nontoxic(x) -> Cxxv(x)) -> therefore Cxxv(caroleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Alexei is hearty. Wilmar is humiliated. Arlette is asternal. All untufted, illusory things are hearty. All hearty things are asternal. If something is humiliated then it is asternal. Round, humiliated things are illusory. Kind, asternal things are not illusory. All talentless things are humiliated. Wilmar is not illusory.", "logic": "\nHearty(alexei)\nHumiliated(wilmar)\nAsternal(arlette)\nforall x (Untufted(x) and Illusory(x) -> Hearty(x))\nforall x (Hearty(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Humiliated(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Asternal(x) and Humiliated(x) -> Illusory(x))\nforall x (Untufted(x) and Asternal(x) -> not Illusory(x))\nforall x (Talentless(x) -> Humiliated(x))\n\nnot Illusory(wilmar)\n\nHumiliated(wilmar) and forall x (Humiliated(x) -> Asternal(x)) -> therefore Asternal(wilmar) Asternal(wilmar) and Humiliated(wilmar) and forall x (Asternal(x) and Humiliated(x) -> Illusory(x)) -> therefore Illusory(wilmar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Frieda is shitless. Dew is dynamic. Raven is shuddery. All theocratic, cloudless things are shitless. All shitless things are shuddery. If something is dynamic then it is shuddery. Round, dynamic things are cloudless. Kind, shuddery things are not cloudless. All sublimated things are dynamic. Frieda is not cloudless.", "logic": "\nShitless(frieda)\nDynamic(dew)\nShuddery(raven)\nforall x (Theocratic(x) and Cloudless(x) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Dynamic(x) -> Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Shuddery(x) and Dynamic(x) -> Cloudless(x))\nforall x (Theocratic(x) and Shuddery(x) -> not Cloudless(x))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> Dynamic(x))\n\nnot Cloudless(frieda)\n\nforall x (Shuddery(x) and Dynamic(x) -> Cloudless(x)) <- forall x (Sublimated(x) -> Dynamic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Junina is comatose. Kippie is bathyal. Yoshi is flaring. All fractious, derivative things are comatose. All comatose things are flaring. If something is bathyal then it is flaring. Round, bathyal things are derivative. Kind, flaring things are not derivative. All spruce things are bathyal. Yoshi is derivative.", "logic": "\nComatose(junina)\nBathyal(kippie)\nFlaring(yoshi)\nforall x (Fractious(x) and Derivative(x) -> Comatose(x))\nforall x (Comatose(x) -> Flaring(x))\nforall x (Bathyal(x) -> Flaring(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Bathyal(x) -> Derivative(x))\nforall x (Fractious(x) and Flaring(x) -> not Derivative(x))\nforall x (Spruce(x) -> Bathyal(x))\n\nDerivative(yoshi)\n\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Bathyal(x) -> Derivative(x)) <- forall x (Spruce(x) -> Bathyal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Corene is nominated. Chase is unimposing. Ari is bismuthal. All taunting, querulous things are nominated. All nominated things are bismuthal. If something is unimposing then it is bismuthal. Round, unimposing things are querulous. Kind, bismuthal things are not querulous. All cautionary things are unimposing. Corene is not unimposing.", "logic": "\nNominated(corene)\nUnimposing(chase)\nBismuthal(ari)\nforall x (Taunting(x) and Querulous(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> Bismuthal(x))\nforall x (Unimposing(x) -> Bismuthal(x))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) and Unimposing(x) -> Querulous(x))\nforall x (Taunting(x) and Bismuthal(x) -> not Querulous(x))\nforall x (Cautionary(x) -> Unimposing(x))\n\nnot Unimposing(corene)\n\nforall x (Cautionary(x) -> Unimposing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Cherry is phalangeal. Julina is herbaceous. Zora is steadied. All brimming, here things are phalangeal. All phalangeal things are steadied. If something is herbaceous then it is steadied. Round, herbaceous things are here. Kind, steadied things are not here. All aeolian things are herbaceous. Julina is aeolian.", "logic": "\nPhalangeal(cherry)\nHerbaceous(julina)\nSteadied(zora)\nforall x (Brimming(x) and Here(x) -> Phalangeal(x))\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) -> Steadied(x))\nforall x (Herbaceous(x) -> Steadied(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) and Herbaceous(x) -> Here(x))\nforall x (Brimming(x) and Steadied(x) -> not Here(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Herbaceous(x))\n\nAeolian(julina)\n\nAeolian(julina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Mauritz is conjugal. Ezechiel is araceous. Stephanus is tigerish. All malleable, agnostical things are conjugal. All conjugal things are tigerish. If something is araceous then it is tigerish. Round, araceous things are agnostical. Kind, tigerish things are not agnostical. All freudian things are araceous. Ezechiel is not red.", "logic": "\nConjugal(mauritz)\nAraceous(ezechiel)\nTigerish(stephanus)\nforall x (Malleable(x) and Agnostical(x) -> Conjugal(x))\nforall x (Conjugal(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) and Araceous(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) and Tigerish(x) -> not Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Freudian(x) -> Araceous(x))\n\nnot Red(ezechiel)\n\nnot Red(ezechiel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "Maia is rupicolous. Davita is well. Jean is acneiform. All anosmatic, glinting things are rupicolous. All rupicolous things are acneiform. If something is well then it is acneiform. Round, well things are glinting. Kind, acneiform things are not glinting. All nihilistic things are well. Jean is nihilistic.", "logic": "\nRupicolous(maia)\nWell(davita)\nAcneiform(jean)\nforall x (Anosmatic(x) and Glinting(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Well(x) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Acneiform(x) and Well(x) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Anosmatic(x) and Acneiform(x) -> not Glinting(x))\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) -> Well(x))\n\nNihilistic(jean)\n\nNihilistic(jean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1784"} {"premises": "The jilli is untroubled. The jilli is not earthy. The jilli is not wise. The jilli joyride the bertha. The jilli mature the bertha. The bertha is untroubled. The bertha is not harsh. The bertha is earthy. The bertha is wise. The bertha curtsey the jilli. The bertha joyride the jilli. The bertha mature the jilli. If something mature the bertha then the bertha mature the jilli. If something is perceptual and it curtsey the bertha then the bertha mature the jilli. If something joyride the bertha then it is perceptual. If something curtsey the bertha and the bertha curtsey the jilli then the bertha joyride the jilli. If the bertha curtsey the jilli and the jilli is perceptual then the jilli does not like the bertha. If something mature the jilli then it curtsey the bertha. The jilli is not wise.", "logic": "\nUntroubled(jilli)\nnot Earthy(jilli)\nnot Wise(jilli)\nJoyride(jilli, bertha)\nMature(jilli, bertha)\nUntroubled(bertha)\nnot Harsh(bertha)\nEarthy(bertha)\nWise(bertha)\nCurtsey(bertha, jilli)\nJoyride(bertha, jilli)\nMature(bertha, jilli)\nforall x (Mature(x, bertha) -> Mature(bertha, jilli))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) and Curtsey(x, bertha) -> Mature(bertha, jilli))\nforall x (Joyride(x, bertha) -> Perceptual(x))\nforall x (Curtsey(x, bertha) and Curtsey(bertha, jilli) -> Joyride(bertha, jilli))\nCurtsey(bertha, jilli) and Perceptual(jilli) -> not Curtsey(jilli, bertha)\nforall x (Mature(x, jilli) -> Curtsey(x, bertha))\n\nnot Wise(jilli)\n\ntherefore not Wise(jilli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The aubrie is enduring. The aubrie is not mislabeled. The aubrie is not ersatz. The aubrie master the alisa. The aubrie damn the alisa. The alisa is enduring. The alisa is not midi. The alisa is mislabeled. The alisa is ersatz. The alisa black the aubrie. The alisa master the aubrie. The alisa damn the aubrie. If something damn the alisa then the alisa damn the aubrie. If something is unwed and it black the alisa then the alisa damn the aubrie. If something master the alisa then it is unwed. If something black the alisa and the alisa black the aubrie then the alisa master the aubrie. If the alisa black the aubrie and the aubrie is unwed then the aubrie does not like the alisa. If something damn the aubrie then it black the alisa. The alisa is not enduring.", "logic": "\nEnduring(aubrie)\nnot Mislabeled(aubrie)\nnot Ersatz(aubrie)\nMaster(aubrie, alisa)\nDamn(aubrie, alisa)\nEnduring(alisa)\nnot Midi(alisa)\nMislabeled(alisa)\nErsatz(alisa)\nBlack(alisa, aubrie)\nMaster(alisa, aubrie)\nDamn(alisa, aubrie)\nforall x (Damn(x, alisa) -> Damn(alisa, aubrie))\nforall x (Unwed(x) and Black(x, alisa) -> Damn(alisa, aubrie))\nforall x (Master(x, alisa) -> Unwed(x))\nforall x (Black(x, alisa) and Black(alisa, aubrie) -> Master(alisa, aubrie))\nBlack(alisa, aubrie) and Unwed(aubrie) -> not Black(aubrie, alisa)\nforall x (Damn(x, aubrie) -> Black(x, alisa))\n\nnot Enduring(alisa)\n\ntherefore Enduring(alisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The almeda is broke. The almeda is not slim. The almeda is not ravaged. The almeda christen the uriel. The almeda waive the uriel. The uriel is broke. The uriel is not unfirm. The uriel is slim. The uriel is ravaged. The uriel canopy the almeda. The uriel christen the almeda. The uriel waive the almeda. If something waive the uriel then the uriel waive the almeda. If something is linguistic and it canopy the uriel then the uriel waive the almeda. If something christen the uriel then it is linguistic. If something canopy the uriel and the uriel canopy the almeda then the uriel christen the almeda. If the uriel canopy the almeda and the almeda is linguistic then the almeda does not like the uriel. If something waive the almeda then it canopy the uriel. The uriel canopy the uriel.", "logic": "\nBroke(almeda)\nnot Slim(almeda)\nnot Ravaged(almeda)\nChristen(almeda, uriel)\nWaive(almeda, uriel)\nBroke(uriel)\nnot Unfirm(uriel)\nSlim(uriel)\nRavaged(uriel)\nCanopy(uriel, almeda)\nChristen(uriel, almeda)\nWaive(uriel, almeda)\nforall x (Waive(x, uriel) -> Waive(uriel, almeda))\nforall x (Linguistic(x) and Canopy(x, uriel) -> Waive(uriel, almeda))\nforall x (Christen(x, uriel) -> Linguistic(x))\nforall x (Canopy(x, uriel) and Canopy(uriel, almeda) -> Christen(uriel, almeda))\nCanopy(uriel, almeda) and Linguistic(almeda) -> not Canopy(almeda, uriel)\nforall x (Waive(x, almeda) -> Canopy(x, uriel))\n\nCanopy(uriel, uriel)\n\nWaive(uriel, almeda) and forall x (Waive(x, almeda) -> Canopy(x, uriel)) -> therefore Canopy(uriel, uriel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The willmott is lepidote. The willmott is not indictable. The willmott is not flagrant. The willmott trivialize the marnia. The willmott masquerade the marnia. The marnia is lepidote. The marnia is not boughten. The marnia is indictable. The marnia is flagrant. The marnia compact the willmott. The marnia trivialize the willmott. The marnia masquerade the willmott. If something masquerade the marnia then the marnia masquerade the willmott. If something is mutagenic and it compact the marnia then the marnia masquerade the willmott. If something trivialize the marnia then it is mutagenic. If something compact the marnia and the marnia compact the willmott then the marnia trivialize the willmott. If the marnia compact the willmott and the willmott is mutagenic then the willmott does not like the marnia. If something masquerade the willmott then it compact the marnia. The marnia does not like the marnia.", "logic": "\nLepidote(willmott)\nnot Indictable(willmott)\nnot Flagrant(willmott)\nTrivialize(willmott, marnia)\nMasquerade(willmott, marnia)\nLepidote(marnia)\nnot Boughten(marnia)\nIndictable(marnia)\nFlagrant(marnia)\nCompact(marnia, willmott)\nTrivialize(marnia, willmott)\nMasquerade(marnia, willmott)\nforall x (Masquerade(x, marnia) -> Masquerade(marnia, willmott))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and Compact(x, marnia) -> Masquerade(marnia, willmott))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, marnia) -> Mutagenic(x))\nforall x (Compact(x, marnia) and Compact(marnia, willmott) -> Trivialize(marnia, willmott))\nCompact(marnia, willmott) and Mutagenic(willmott) -> not Compact(willmott, marnia)\nforall x (Masquerade(x, willmott) -> Compact(x, marnia))\n\nnot Compact(marnia, marnia)\n\nMasquerade(marnia, willmott) and forall x (Masquerade(x, willmott) -> Compact(x, marnia)) -> therefore Compact(marnia, marnia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The adrick is farthest. The adrick is not secure. The adrick is not erstwhile. The adrick pride the sasha. The adrick ponder the sasha. The sasha is farthest. The sasha is not conceptual. The sasha is secure. The sasha is erstwhile. The sasha derange the adrick. The sasha pride the adrick. The sasha ponder the adrick. If something ponder the sasha then the sasha ponder the adrick. If something is oblivious and it derange the sasha then the sasha ponder the adrick. If something pride the sasha then it is oblivious. If something derange the sasha and the sasha derange the adrick then the sasha pride the adrick. If the sasha derange the adrick and the adrick is oblivious then the adrick does not like the sasha. If something ponder the adrick then it derange the sasha. The adrick does not like the sasha.", "logic": "\nFarthest(adrick)\nnot Secure(adrick)\nnot Erstwhile(adrick)\nPride(adrick, sasha)\nPonder(adrick, sasha)\nFarthest(sasha)\nnot Conceptual(sasha)\nSecure(sasha)\nErstwhile(sasha)\nDerange(sasha, adrick)\nPride(sasha, adrick)\nPonder(sasha, adrick)\nforall x (Ponder(x, sasha) -> Ponder(sasha, adrick))\nforall x (Oblivious(x) and Derange(x, sasha) -> Ponder(sasha, adrick))\nforall x (Pride(x, sasha) -> Oblivious(x))\nforall x (Derange(x, sasha) and Derange(sasha, adrick) -> Pride(sasha, adrick))\nDerange(sasha, adrick) and Oblivious(adrick) -> not Derange(adrick, sasha)\nforall x (Ponder(x, adrick) -> Derange(x, sasha))\n\nnot Derange(adrick, sasha)\n\nPride(adrick, sasha) and forall x (Pride(x, sasha) -> Oblivious(x)) -> therefore Oblivious(adrick) Derange(sasha, adrick) and Oblivious(adrick) and Derange(sasha, adrick) and Oblivious(adrick) -> not Derange(adrick, sasha) -> therefore not Derange(adrick, sasha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The sharai is lyrate. The sharai is not deducible. The sharai is not sallow. The sharai sack the joseph. The sharai induct the joseph. The joseph is lyrate. The joseph is not recurrent. The joseph is deducible. The joseph is sallow. The joseph convert the sharai. The joseph sack the sharai. The joseph induct the sharai. If something induct the joseph then the joseph induct the sharai. If something is antacid and it convert the joseph then the joseph induct the sharai. If something sack the joseph then it is antacid. If something convert the joseph and the joseph convert the sharai then the joseph sack the sharai. If the joseph convert the sharai and the sharai is antacid then the sharai does not like the joseph. If something induct the sharai then it convert the joseph. The sharai convert the joseph.", "logic": "\nLyrate(sharai)\nnot Deducible(sharai)\nnot Sallow(sharai)\nSack(sharai, joseph)\nInduct(sharai, joseph)\nLyrate(joseph)\nnot Recurrent(joseph)\nDeducible(joseph)\nSallow(joseph)\nConvert(joseph, sharai)\nSack(joseph, sharai)\nInduct(joseph, sharai)\nforall x (Induct(x, joseph) -> Induct(joseph, sharai))\nforall x (Antacid(x) and Convert(x, joseph) -> Induct(joseph, sharai))\nforall x (Sack(x, joseph) -> Antacid(x))\nforall x (Convert(x, joseph) and Convert(joseph, sharai) -> Sack(joseph, sharai))\nConvert(joseph, sharai) and Antacid(sharai) -> not Convert(sharai, joseph)\nforall x (Induct(x, sharai) -> Convert(x, joseph))\n\nConvert(sharai, joseph)\n\nSack(sharai, joseph) and forall x (Sack(x, joseph) -> Antacid(x)) -> therefore Antacid(sharai) Convert(joseph, sharai) and Antacid(sharai) and Convert(joseph, sharai) and Antacid(sharai) -> not Convert(sharai, joseph) -> therefore not Convert(sharai, joseph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The paige is bedfast. The paige is not chinchy. The paige is not creditable. The paige overact the joycelin. The paige gutter the joycelin. The joycelin is bedfast. The joycelin is not alleviated. The joycelin is chinchy. The joycelin is creditable. The joycelin brim the paige. The joycelin overact the paige. The joycelin gutter the paige. If something gutter the joycelin then the joycelin gutter the paige. If something is pappose and it brim the joycelin then the joycelin gutter the paige. If something overact the joycelin then it is pappose. If something brim the joycelin and the joycelin brim the paige then the joycelin overact the paige. If the joycelin brim the paige and the paige is pappose then the paige does not like the joycelin. If something gutter the paige then it brim the joycelin. The joycelin is not pappose.", "logic": "\nBedfast(paige)\nnot Chinchy(paige)\nnot Creditable(paige)\nOveract(paige, joycelin)\nGutter(paige, joycelin)\nBedfast(joycelin)\nnot Alleviated(joycelin)\nChinchy(joycelin)\nCreditable(joycelin)\nBrim(joycelin, paige)\nOveract(joycelin, paige)\nGutter(joycelin, paige)\nforall x (Gutter(x, joycelin) -> Gutter(joycelin, paige))\nforall x (Pappose(x) and Brim(x, joycelin) -> Gutter(joycelin, paige))\nforall x (Overact(x, joycelin) -> Pappose(x))\nforall x (Brim(x, joycelin) and Brim(joycelin, paige) -> Overact(joycelin, paige))\nBrim(joycelin, paige) and Pappose(paige) -> not Brim(paige, joycelin)\nforall x (Gutter(x, paige) -> Brim(x, joycelin))\n\nnot Pappose(joycelin)\n\nforall x (Overact(x, joycelin) -> Pappose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The danyette is oversea. The danyette is not medusoid. The danyette is not unimagined. The danyette euphemise the marylou. The danyette librate the marylou. The marylou is oversea. The marylou is not elder. The marylou is medusoid. The marylou is unimagined. The marylou deem the danyette. The marylou euphemise the danyette. The marylou librate the danyette. If something librate the marylou then the marylou librate the danyette. If something is neuronic and it deem the marylou then the marylou librate the danyette. If something euphemise the marylou then it is neuronic. If something deem the marylou and the marylou deem the danyette then the marylou euphemise the danyette. If the marylou deem the danyette and the danyette is neuronic then the danyette does not like the marylou. If something librate the danyette then it deem the marylou. The danyette librate the danyette.", "logic": "\nOversea(danyette)\nnot Medusoid(danyette)\nnot Unimagined(danyette)\nEuphemise(danyette, marylou)\nLibrate(danyette, marylou)\nOversea(marylou)\nnot Elder(marylou)\nMedusoid(marylou)\nUnimagined(marylou)\nDeem(marylou, danyette)\nEuphemise(marylou, danyette)\nLibrate(marylou, danyette)\nforall x (Librate(x, marylou) -> Librate(marylou, danyette))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) and Deem(x, marylou) -> Librate(marylou, danyette))\nforall x (Euphemise(x, marylou) -> Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Deem(x, marylou) and Deem(marylou, danyette) -> Euphemise(marylou, danyette))\nDeem(marylou, danyette) and Neuronic(danyette) -> not Deem(danyette, marylou)\nforall x (Librate(x, danyette) -> Deem(x, marylou))\n\nLibrate(danyette, danyette)\n\nLibrate(danyette, danyette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The janey is haematal. The janey is not irritative. The janey is not renewing. The janey upset the bentley. The janey mourn the bentley. The bentley is haematal. The bentley is not forcible. The bentley is irritative. The bentley is renewing. The bentley oxygenise the janey. The bentley upset the janey. The bentley mourn the janey. If something mourn the bentley then the bentley mourn the janey. If something is lined and it oxygenise the bentley then the bentley mourn the janey. If something upset the bentley then it is lined. If something oxygenise the bentley and the bentley oxygenise the janey then the bentley upset the janey. If the bentley oxygenise the janey and the janey is lined then the janey does not like the bentley. If something mourn the janey then it oxygenise the bentley. The bentley does not need the bentley.", "logic": "\nHaematal(janey)\nnot Irritative(janey)\nnot Renewing(janey)\nUpset(janey, bentley)\nMourn(janey, bentley)\nHaematal(bentley)\nnot Forcible(bentley)\nIrritative(bentley)\nRenewing(bentley)\nOxygenise(bentley, janey)\nUpset(bentley, janey)\nMourn(bentley, janey)\nforall x (Mourn(x, bentley) -> Mourn(bentley, janey))\nforall x (Lined(x) and Oxygenise(x, bentley) -> Mourn(bentley, janey))\nforall x (Upset(x, bentley) -> Lined(x))\nforall x (Oxygenise(x, bentley) and Oxygenise(bentley, janey) -> Upset(bentley, janey))\nOxygenise(bentley, janey) and Lined(janey) -> not Oxygenise(janey, bentley)\nforall x (Mourn(x, janey) -> Oxygenise(x, bentley))\n\nnot Upset(bentley, bentley)\n\nnot Upset(bentley, bentley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The bernie is postictal. The bernie is not armillary. The bernie is not chipper. The bernie gloss the adrea. The bernie freeze the adrea. The adrea is postictal. The adrea is not unsealed. The adrea is armillary. The adrea is chipper. The adrea cocainize the bernie. The adrea gloss the bernie. The adrea freeze the bernie. If something freeze the adrea then the adrea freeze the bernie. If something is breathed and it cocainize the adrea then the adrea freeze the bernie. If something gloss the adrea then it is breathed. If something cocainize the adrea and the adrea cocainize the bernie then the adrea gloss the bernie. If the adrea cocainize the bernie and the bernie is breathed then the bernie does not like the adrea. If something freeze the bernie then it cocainize the adrea. The bernie is unsealed.", "logic": "\nPostictal(bernie)\nnot Armillary(bernie)\nnot Chipper(bernie)\nGloss(bernie, adrea)\nFreeze(bernie, adrea)\nPostictal(adrea)\nnot Unsealed(adrea)\nArmillary(adrea)\nChipper(adrea)\nCocainize(adrea, bernie)\nGloss(adrea, bernie)\nFreeze(adrea, bernie)\nforall x (Freeze(x, adrea) -> Freeze(adrea, bernie))\nforall x (Breathed(x) and Cocainize(x, adrea) -> Freeze(adrea, bernie))\nforall x (Gloss(x, adrea) -> Breathed(x))\nforall x (Cocainize(x, adrea) and Cocainize(adrea, bernie) -> Gloss(adrea, bernie))\nCocainize(adrea, bernie) and Breathed(bernie) -> not Cocainize(bernie, adrea)\nforall x (Freeze(x, bernie) -> Cocainize(x, adrea))\n\nUnsealed(bernie)\n\nUnsealed(bernie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The odelia is aerobic. The odelia is not extensile. The odelia is not freckled. The odelia stalk the hercule. The odelia please the hercule. The hercule is aerobic. The hercule is not iodised. The hercule is extensile. The hercule is freckled. The hercule repercuss the odelia. The hercule stalk the odelia. The hercule please the odelia. If something please the hercule then the hercule please the odelia. If something is erstwhile and it repercuss the hercule then the hercule please the odelia. If something stalk the hercule then it is erstwhile. If something repercuss the hercule and the hercule repercuss the odelia then the hercule stalk the odelia. If the hercule repercuss the odelia and the odelia is erstwhile then the odelia does not like the hercule. If something please the odelia then it repercuss the hercule. The hercule does not visit the hercule.", "logic": "\nAerobic(odelia)\nnot Extensile(odelia)\nnot Freckled(odelia)\nStalk(odelia, hercule)\nPlease(odelia, hercule)\nAerobic(hercule)\nnot Iodised(hercule)\nExtensile(hercule)\nFreckled(hercule)\nRepercuss(hercule, odelia)\nStalk(hercule, odelia)\nPlease(hercule, odelia)\nforall x (Please(x, hercule) -> Please(hercule, odelia))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) and Repercuss(x, hercule) -> Please(hercule, odelia))\nforall x (Stalk(x, hercule) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, hercule) and Repercuss(hercule, odelia) -> Stalk(hercule, odelia))\nRepercuss(hercule, odelia) and Erstwhile(odelia) -> not Repercuss(odelia, hercule)\nforall x (Please(x, odelia) -> Repercuss(x, hercule))\n\nnot Please(hercule, hercule)\n\nnot Please(hercule, hercule) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "The jordon is antheral. The jordon is not vague. The jordon is not honored. The jordon drydock the beowulf. The jordon narrow the beowulf. The beowulf is antheral. The beowulf is not arcuate. The beowulf is vague. The beowulf is honored. The beowulf repay the jordon. The beowulf drydock the jordon. The beowulf narrow the jordon. If something narrow the beowulf then the beowulf narrow the jordon. If something is crosstown and it repay the beowulf then the beowulf narrow the jordon. If something drydock the beowulf then it is crosstown. If something repay the beowulf and the beowulf repay the jordon then the beowulf drydock the jordon. If the beowulf repay the jordon and the jordon is crosstown then the jordon does not like the beowulf. If something narrow the jordon then it repay the beowulf. The jordon repay the jordon.", "logic": "\nAntheral(jordon)\nnot Vague(jordon)\nnot Honored(jordon)\nDrydock(jordon, beowulf)\nNarrow(jordon, beowulf)\nAntheral(beowulf)\nnot Arcuate(beowulf)\nVague(beowulf)\nHonored(beowulf)\nRepay(beowulf, jordon)\nDrydock(beowulf, jordon)\nNarrow(beowulf, jordon)\nforall x (Narrow(x, beowulf) -> Narrow(beowulf, jordon))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) and Repay(x, beowulf) -> Narrow(beowulf, jordon))\nforall x (Drydock(x, beowulf) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Repay(x, beowulf) and Repay(beowulf, jordon) -> Drydock(beowulf, jordon))\nRepay(beowulf, jordon) and Crosstown(jordon) -> not Repay(jordon, beowulf)\nforall x (Narrow(x, jordon) -> Repay(x, beowulf))\n\nRepay(jordon, jordon)\n\nRepay(jordon, jordon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "James is sixfold. James is not unformed. James is paramount. Andie is groundless. Andie is cousinly. Andie is not unformed. Andie is swaggering. Raynard is persistent. Raynard is cousinly. Raynard is unformed. Raynard is swaggering. Raynard is paramount. All groundless people are persistent. All unformed, cousinly people are swaggering. If Andie is persistent and Andie is not unformed then Andie is groundless. Big, groundless people are paramount. Big, cousinly people are groundless. If someone is cousinly and not unformed then they are groundless. If James is groundless then James is not cousinly. If someone is swaggering and not paramount then they are not sixfold. Andie is swaggering.", "logic": "\nSixfold(james)\nnot Unformed(james)\nParamount(james)\nGroundless(andie)\nCousinly(andie)\nnot Unformed(andie)\nSwaggering(andie)\nPersistent(raynard)\nCousinly(raynard)\nUnformed(raynard)\nSwaggering(raynard)\nParamount(raynard)\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Persistent(x))\nforall x (Unformed(x) and Cousinly(x) -> Swaggering(x))\nPersistent(andie) and not Unformed(andie) -> Groundless(andie)\nforall x (Persistent(x) and Groundless(x) -> Paramount(x))\nforall x (Persistent(x) and Cousinly(x) -> Groundless(x))\nforall x (Cousinly(x) and not Unformed(x) -> Groundless(x))\nGroundless(james) -> not Cousinly(james)\nforall x (Swaggering(x) and not Paramount(x) -> not Sixfold(x))\n\nSwaggering(andie)\n\ntherefore Swaggering(andie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Torry is gooey. Torry is not russet. Torry is burly. Noelle is leaved. Noelle is midland. Noelle is not russet. Noelle is suicidal. Dania is jocose. Dania is midland. Dania is russet. Dania is suicidal. Dania is burly. All leaved people are jocose. All russet, midland people are suicidal. If Noelle is jocose and Noelle is not russet then Noelle is leaved. Big, leaved people are burly. Big, midland people are leaved. If someone is midland and not russet then they are leaved. If Torry is leaved then Torry is not midland. If someone is suicidal and not burly then they are not gooey. Dania is not jocose.", "logic": "\nGooey(torry)\nnot Russet(torry)\nBurly(torry)\nLeaved(noelle)\nMidland(noelle)\nnot Russet(noelle)\nSuicidal(noelle)\nJocose(dania)\nMidland(dania)\nRusset(dania)\nSuicidal(dania)\nBurly(dania)\nforall x (Leaved(x) -> Jocose(x))\nforall x (Russet(x) and Midland(x) -> Suicidal(x))\nJocose(noelle) and not Russet(noelle) -> Leaved(noelle)\nforall x (Jocose(x) and Leaved(x) -> Burly(x))\nforall x (Jocose(x) and Midland(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Midland(x) and not Russet(x) -> Leaved(x))\nLeaved(torry) -> not Midland(torry)\nforall x (Suicidal(x) and not Burly(x) -> not Gooey(x))\n\nnot Jocose(dania)\n\ntherefore Jocose(dania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Todd is resistive. Todd is not fleshly. Todd is taliped. Aldrich is faveolate. Aldrich is basic. Aldrich is not fleshly. Aldrich is exigent. Karrah is answerable. Karrah is basic. Karrah is fleshly. Karrah is exigent. Karrah is taliped. All faveolate people are answerable. All fleshly, basic people are exigent. If Aldrich is answerable and Aldrich is not fleshly then Aldrich is faveolate. Big, faveolate people are taliped. Big, basic people are faveolate. If someone is basic and not fleshly then they are faveolate. If Todd is faveolate then Todd is not basic. If someone is exigent and not taliped then they are not resistive. Karrah is faveolate.", "logic": "\nResistive(todd)\nnot Fleshly(todd)\nTaliped(todd)\nFaveolate(aldrich)\nBasic(aldrich)\nnot Fleshly(aldrich)\nExigent(aldrich)\nAnswerable(karrah)\nBasic(karrah)\nFleshly(karrah)\nExigent(karrah)\nTaliped(karrah)\nforall x (Faveolate(x) -> Answerable(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) and Basic(x) -> Exigent(x))\nAnswerable(aldrich) and not Fleshly(aldrich) -> Faveolate(aldrich)\nforall x (Answerable(x) and Faveolate(x) -> Taliped(x))\nforall x (Answerable(x) and Basic(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Basic(x) and not Fleshly(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nFaveolate(todd) -> not Basic(todd)\nforall x (Exigent(x) and not Taliped(x) -> not Resistive(x))\n\nFaveolate(karrah)\n\nAnswerable(karrah) and Basic(karrah) and forall x (Answerable(x) and Basic(x) -> Faveolate(x)) -> therefore Faveolate(karrah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Edna is tiresome. Edna is not perverse. Edna is achromic. Murray is unlipped. Murray is hottish. Murray is not perverse. Murray is agnostical. Arianne is gonzo. Arianne is hottish. Arianne is perverse. Arianne is agnostical. Arianne is achromic. All unlipped people are gonzo. All perverse, hottish people are agnostical. If Murray is gonzo and Murray is not perverse then Murray is unlipped. Big, unlipped people are achromic. Big, hottish people are unlipped. If someone is hottish and not perverse then they are unlipped. If Edna is unlipped then Edna is not hottish. If someone is agnostical and not achromic then they are not tiresome. Arianne is not unlipped.", "logic": "\nTiresome(edna)\nnot Perverse(edna)\nAchromic(edna)\nUnlipped(murray)\nHottish(murray)\nnot Perverse(murray)\nAgnostical(murray)\nGonzo(arianne)\nHottish(arianne)\nPerverse(arianne)\nAgnostical(arianne)\nAchromic(arianne)\nforall x (Unlipped(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) and Hottish(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nGonzo(murray) and not Perverse(murray) -> Unlipped(murray)\nforall x (Gonzo(x) and Unlipped(x) -> Achromic(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) and Hottish(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Hottish(x) and not Perverse(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nUnlipped(edna) -> not Hottish(edna)\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and not Achromic(x) -> not Tiresome(x))\n\nnot Unlipped(arianne)\n\nGonzo(arianne) and Hottish(arianne) and forall x (Gonzo(x) and Hottish(x) -> Unlipped(x)) -> therefore Unlipped(arianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Joanne is hollow. Joanne is not lesbian. Joanne is reprobate. Don is riemannian. Don is advisable. Don is not lesbian. Don is diminutive. Hew is bivalve. Hew is advisable. Hew is lesbian. Hew is diminutive. Hew is reprobate. All riemannian people are bivalve. All lesbian, advisable people are diminutive. If Don is bivalve and Don is not lesbian then Don is riemannian. Big, riemannian people are reprobate. Big, advisable people are riemannian. If someone is advisable and not lesbian then they are riemannian. If Joanne is riemannian then Joanne is not advisable. If someone is diminutive and not reprobate then they are not hollow. Don is reprobate.", "logic": "\nHollow(joanne)\nnot Lesbian(joanne)\nReprobate(joanne)\nRiemannian(don)\nAdvisable(don)\nnot Lesbian(don)\nDiminutive(don)\nBivalve(hew)\nAdvisable(hew)\nLesbian(hew)\nDiminutive(hew)\nReprobate(hew)\nforall x (Riemannian(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Lesbian(x) and Advisable(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nBivalve(don) and not Lesbian(don) -> Riemannian(don)\nforall x (Bivalve(x) and Riemannian(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) and Advisable(x) -> Riemannian(x))\nforall x (Advisable(x) and not Lesbian(x) -> Riemannian(x))\nRiemannian(joanne) -> not Advisable(joanne)\nforall x (Diminutive(x) and not Reprobate(x) -> not Hollow(x))\n\nReprobate(don)\n\nRiemannian(don) and forall x (Riemannian(x) -> Bivalve(x)) -> therefore Bivalve(don) Bivalve(don) and Riemannian(don) and forall x (Bivalve(x) and Riemannian(x) -> Reprobate(x)) -> therefore Reprobate(don)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Ephram is cultured. Ephram is not libertine. Ephram is idiopathic. Candice is antecedent. Candice is barbadian. Candice is not libertine. Candice is abused. Yetta is dusky. Yetta is barbadian. Yetta is libertine. Yetta is abused. Yetta is idiopathic. All antecedent people are dusky. All libertine, barbadian people are abused. If Candice is dusky and Candice is not libertine then Candice is antecedent. Big, antecedent people are idiopathic. Big, barbadian people are antecedent. If someone is barbadian and not libertine then they are antecedent. If Ephram is antecedent then Ephram is not barbadian. If someone is abused and not idiopathic then they are not cultured. Candice is not idiopathic.", "logic": "\nCultured(ephram)\nnot Libertine(ephram)\nIdiopathic(ephram)\nAntecedent(candice)\nBarbadian(candice)\nnot Libertine(candice)\nAbused(candice)\nDusky(yetta)\nBarbadian(yetta)\nLibertine(yetta)\nAbused(yetta)\nIdiopathic(yetta)\nforall x (Antecedent(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Libertine(x) and Barbadian(x) -> Abused(x))\nDusky(candice) and not Libertine(candice) -> Antecedent(candice)\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Antecedent(x) -> Idiopathic(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Barbadian(x) -> Antecedent(x))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) and not Libertine(x) -> Antecedent(x))\nAntecedent(ephram) -> not Barbadian(ephram)\nforall x (Abused(x) and not Idiopathic(x) -> not Cultured(x))\n\nnot Idiopathic(candice)\n\nAntecedent(candice) and forall x (Antecedent(x) -> Dusky(x)) -> therefore Dusky(candice) Dusky(candice) and Antecedent(candice) and forall x (Dusky(x) and Antecedent(x) -> Idiopathic(x)) -> therefore Idiopathic(candice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Ivie is unshaken. Ivie is not cluttered. Ivie is jailed. Tiffie is spirited. Tiffie is grizzled. Tiffie is not cluttered. Tiffie is avian. Jordain is hypnoid. Jordain is grizzled. Jordain is cluttered. Jordain is avian. Jordain is jailed. All spirited people are hypnoid. All cluttered, grizzled people are avian. If Tiffie is hypnoid and Tiffie is not cluttered then Tiffie is spirited. Big, spirited people are jailed. Big, grizzled people are spirited. If someone is grizzled and not cluttered then they are spirited. If Ivie is spirited then Ivie is not grizzled. If someone is avian and not jailed then they are not unshaken. Ivie is not spirited.", "logic": "\nUnshaken(ivie)\nnot Cluttered(ivie)\nJailed(ivie)\nSpirited(tiffie)\nGrizzled(tiffie)\nnot Cluttered(tiffie)\nAvian(tiffie)\nHypnoid(jordain)\nGrizzled(jordain)\nCluttered(jordain)\nAvian(jordain)\nJailed(jordain)\nforall x (Spirited(x) -> Hypnoid(x))\nforall x (Cluttered(x) and Grizzled(x) -> Avian(x))\nHypnoid(tiffie) and not Cluttered(tiffie) -> Spirited(tiffie)\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Spirited(x) -> Jailed(x))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Grizzled(x) -> Spirited(x))\nforall x (Grizzled(x) and not Cluttered(x) -> Spirited(x))\nSpirited(ivie) -> not Grizzled(ivie)\nforall x (Avian(x) and not Jailed(x) -> not Unshaken(x))\n\nnot Spirited(ivie)\n\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Grizzled(x) -> Spirited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Damian is down. Damian is not mesophytic. Damian is envisioned. Konstanze is unnerving. Konstanze is peccant. Konstanze is not mesophytic. Konstanze is composite. Faina is dosed. Faina is peccant. Faina is mesophytic. Faina is composite. Faina is envisioned. All unnerving people are dosed. All mesophytic, peccant people are composite. If Konstanze is dosed and Konstanze is not mesophytic then Konstanze is unnerving. Big, unnerving people are envisioned. Big, peccant people are unnerving. If someone is peccant and not mesophytic then they are unnerving. If Damian is unnerving then Damian is not peccant. If someone is composite and not envisioned then they are not down. Damian is dosed.", "logic": "\nDown(damian)\nnot Mesophytic(damian)\nEnvisioned(damian)\nUnnerving(konstanze)\nPeccant(konstanze)\nnot Mesophytic(konstanze)\nComposite(konstanze)\nDosed(faina)\nPeccant(faina)\nMesophytic(faina)\nComposite(faina)\nEnvisioned(faina)\nforall x (Unnerving(x) -> Dosed(x))\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) and Peccant(x) -> Composite(x))\nDosed(konstanze) and not Mesophytic(konstanze) -> Unnerving(konstanze)\nforall x (Dosed(x) and Unnerving(x) -> Envisioned(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) and Peccant(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Peccant(x) and not Mesophytic(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nUnnerving(damian) -> not Peccant(damian)\nforall x (Composite(x) and not Envisioned(x) -> not Down(x))\n\nDosed(damian)\n\nforall x (Unnerving(x) -> Dosed(x)) <- forall x (Dosed(x) and Peccant(x) -> Unnerving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Konstanze is wistful. Konstanze is not flickering. Konstanze is figural. Nananne is hearty. Nananne is expurgated. Nananne is not flickering. Nananne is pyloric. Alford is unsinkable. Alford is expurgated. Alford is flickering. Alford is pyloric. Alford is figural. All hearty people are unsinkable. All flickering, expurgated people are pyloric. If Nananne is unsinkable and Nananne is not flickering then Nananne is hearty. Big, hearty people are figural. Big, expurgated people are hearty. If someone is expurgated and not flickering then they are hearty. If Konstanze is hearty then Konstanze is not expurgated. If someone is pyloric and not figural then they are not wistful. Konstanze is not pyloric.", "logic": "\nWistful(konstanze)\nnot Flickering(konstanze)\nFigural(konstanze)\nHearty(nananne)\nExpurgated(nananne)\nnot Flickering(nananne)\nPyloric(nananne)\nUnsinkable(alford)\nExpurgated(alford)\nFlickering(alford)\nPyloric(alford)\nFigural(alford)\nforall x (Hearty(x) -> Unsinkable(x))\nforall x (Flickering(x) and Expurgated(x) -> Pyloric(x))\nUnsinkable(nananne) and not Flickering(nananne) -> Hearty(nananne)\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) and Hearty(x) -> Figural(x))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) and Expurgated(x) -> Hearty(x))\nforall x (Expurgated(x) and not Flickering(x) -> Hearty(x))\nHearty(konstanze) -> not Expurgated(konstanze)\nforall x (Pyloric(x) and not Figural(x) -> not Wistful(x))\n\nnot Pyloric(konstanze)\n\nforall x (Flickering(x) and Expurgated(x) -> Pyloric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Robenia is porous. Robenia is not indignant. Robenia is hearing. Issie is exogenic. Issie is unfeigned. Issie is not indignant. Issie is drippy. Grove is chlorotic. Grove is unfeigned. Grove is indignant. Grove is drippy. Grove is hearing. All exogenic people are chlorotic. All indignant, unfeigned people are drippy. If Issie is chlorotic and Issie is not indignant then Issie is exogenic. Big, exogenic people are hearing. Big, unfeigned people are exogenic. If someone is unfeigned and not indignant then they are exogenic. If Robenia is exogenic then Robenia is not unfeigned. If someone is drippy and not hearing then they are not porous. Grove is porous.", "logic": "\nPorous(robenia)\nnot Indignant(robenia)\nHearing(robenia)\nExogenic(issie)\nUnfeigned(issie)\nnot Indignant(issie)\nDrippy(issie)\nChlorotic(grove)\nUnfeigned(grove)\nIndignant(grove)\nDrippy(grove)\nHearing(grove)\nforall x (Exogenic(x) -> Chlorotic(x))\nforall x (Indignant(x) and Unfeigned(x) -> Drippy(x))\nChlorotic(issie) and not Indignant(issie) -> Exogenic(issie)\nforall x (Chlorotic(x) and Exogenic(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Chlorotic(x) and Unfeigned(x) -> Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Unfeigned(x) and not Indignant(x) -> Exogenic(x))\nExogenic(robenia) -> not Unfeigned(robenia)\nforall x (Drippy(x) and not Hearing(x) -> not Porous(x))\n\nPorous(grove)\n\nPorous(grove) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Jeremiah is pacific. Jeremiah is not statant. Jeremiah is dissected. Diana is yearly. Diana is binocular. Diana is not statant. Diana is huffish. Ozzy is anabiotic. Ozzy is binocular. Ozzy is statant. Ozzy is huffish. Ozzy is dissected. All yearly people are anabiotic. All statant, binocular people are huffish. If Diana is anabiotic and Diana is not statant then Diana is yearly. Big, yearly people are dissected. Big, binocular people are yearly. If someone is binocular and not statant then they are yearly. If Jeremiah is yearly then Jeremiah is not binocular. If someone is huffish and not dissected then they are not pacific. Diana is not pacific.", "logic": "\nPacific(jeremiah)\nnot Statant(jeremiah)\nDissected(jeremiah)\nYearly(diana)\nBinocular(diana)\nnot Statant(diana)\nHuffish(diana)\nAnabiotic(ozzy)\nBinocular(ozzy)\nStatant(ozzy)\nHuffish(ozzy)\nDissected(ozzy)\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Statant(x) and Binocular(x) -> Huffish(x))\nAnabiotic(diana) and not Statant(diana) -> Yearly(diana)\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and Yearly(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and Binocular(x) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) and not Statant(x) -> Yearly(x))\nYearly(jeremiah) -> not Binocular(jeremiah)\nforall x (Huffish(x) and not Dissected(x) -> not Pacific(x))\n\nnot Pacific(diana)\n\nnot Pacific(diana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Garvin is unbending. Garvin is not bearable. Garvin is unifying. Moses is obstetric. Moses is sulfurized. Moses is not bearable. Moses is chargeable. Morgen is fetal. Morgen is sulfurized. Morgen is bearable. Morgen is chargeable. Morgen is unifying. All obstetric people are fetal. All bearable, sulfurized people are chargeable. If Moses is fetal and Moses is not bearable then Moses is obstetric. Big, obstetric people are unifying. Big, sulfurized people are obstetric. If someone is sulfurized and not bearable then they are obstetric. If Garvin is obstetric then Garvin is not sulfurized. If someone is chargeable and not unifying then they are not unbending. Garvin is sulfurized.", "logic": "\nUnbending(garvin)\nnot Bearable(garvin)\nUnifying(garvin)\nObstetric(moses)\nSulfurized(moses)\nnot Bearable(moses)\nChargeable(moses)\nFetal(morgen)\nSulfurized(morgen)\nBearable(morgen)\nChargeable(morgen)\nUnifying(morgen)\nforall x (Obstetric(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Bearable(x) and Sulfurized(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nFetal(moses) and not Bearable(moses) -> Obstetric(moses)\nforall x (Fetal(x) and Obstetric(x) -> Unifying(x))\nforall x (Fetal(x) and Sulfurized(x) -> Obstetric(x))\nforall x (Sulfurized(x) and not Bearable(x) -> Obstetric(x))\nObstetric(garvin) -> not Sulfurized(garvin)\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and not Unifying(x) -> not Unbending(x))\n\nSulfurized(garvin)\n\nSulfurized(garvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "The ardenia is aided. The ardenia is colonic. The ardenia is defendable. The ardenia is extended. The ardenia is umber. The ardenia punish the kirstie. The ardenia lance the kirstie. The kirstie is extended. The kirstie peruse the ardenia. The kirstie lance the ardenia. If something is extended and it punish the ardenia then it is defendable. If the ardenia punish the kirstie and the kirstie lance the ardenia then the ardenia lance the kirstie. If something is extended then it peruse the ardenia. If the ardenia lance the kirstie and the ardenia is extended then the ardenia punish the kirstie. If something punish the kirstie and the kirstie is aided then the kirstie peruse the ardenia. If something is colonic and it lance the ardenia then it is defendable. If something lance the ardenia then it punish the ardenia. If something is defendable and it punish the ardenia then the ardenia punish the kirstie. The kirstie lance the ardenia.", "logic": "\nAided(ardenia)\nColonic(ardenia)\nDefendable(ardenia)\nExtended(ardenia)\nUmber(ardenia)\nPunish(ardenia, kirstie)\nLance(ardenia, kirstie)\nExtended(kirstie)\nPeruse(kirstie, ardenia)\nLance(kirstie, ardenia)\nforall x (Extended(x) and Punish(x, ardenia) -> Defendable(x))\nPunish(ardenia, kirstie) and Lance(kirstie, ardenia) -> Lance(ardenia, kirstie)\nforall x (Extended(x) -> Peruse(x, ardenia))\nLance(ardenia, kirstie) and Extended(ardenia) -> Punish(ardenia, kirstie)\nforall x (Punish(x, kirstie) and Aided(kirstie) -> Peruse(kirstie, ardenia))\nforall x (Colonic(x) and Lance(x, ardenia) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Lance(x, ardenia) -> Punish(x, ardenia))\nforall x (Defendable(x) and Punish(x, ardenia) -> Punish(ardenia, kirstie))\n\nLance(kirstie, ardenia)\n\ntherefore Lance(kirstie, ardenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The torrence is stalked. The torrence is braggart. The torrence is squared. The torrence is minimum. The torrence is legato. The torrence shin the isidora. The torrence harrow the isidora. The isidora is minimum. The isidora quest the torrence. The isidora harrow the torrence. If something is minimum and it shin the torrence then it is squared. If the torrence shin the isidora and the isidora harrow the torrence then the torrence harrow the isidora. If something is minimum then it quest the torrence. If the torrence harrow the isidora and the torrence is minimum then the torrence shin the isidora. If something shin the isidora and the isidora is stalked then the isidora quest the torrence. If something is braggart and it harrow the torrence then it is squared. If something harrow the torrence then it shin the torrence. If something is squared and it shin the torrence then the torrence shin the isidora. The torrence does not need the isidora.", "logic": "\nStalked(torrence)\nBraggart(torrence)\nSquared(torrence)\nMinimum(torrence)\nLegato(torrence)\nShin(torrence, isidora)\nHarrow(torrence, isidora)\nMinimum(isidora)\nQuest(isidora, torrence)\nHarrow(isidora, torrence)\nforall x (Minimum(x) and Shin(x, torrence) -> Squared(x))\nShin(torrence, isidora) and Harrow(isidora, torrence) -> Harrow(torrence, isidora)\nforall x (Minimum(x) -> Quest(x, torrence))\nHarrow(torrence, isidora) and Minimum(torrence) -> Shin(torrence, isidora)\nforall x (Shin(x, isidora) and Stalked(isidora) -> Quest(isidora, torrence))\nforall x (Braggart(x) and Harrow(x, torrence) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Harrow(x, torrence) -> Shin(x, torrence))\nforall x (Squared(x) and Shin(x, torrence) -> Shin(torrence, isidora))\n\nnot Shin(torrence, isidora)\n\ntherefore Shin(torrence, isidora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The joane is valueless. The joane is pyknic. The joane is xviii. The joane is untitled. The joane is unmourned. The joane concertina the kalli. The joane broaden the kalli. The kalli is untitled. The kalli purvey the joane. The kalli broaden the joane. If something is untitled and it concertina the joane then it is xviii. If the joane concertina the kalli and the kalli broaden the joane then the joane broaden the kalli. If something is untitled then it purvey the joane. If the joane broaden the kalli and the joane is untitled then the joane concertina the kalli. If something concertina the kalli and the kalli is valueless then the kalli purvey the joane. If something is pyknic and it broaden the joane then it is xviii. If something broaden the joane then it concertina the joane. If something is xviii and it concertina the joane then the joane concertina the kalli. The kalli concertina the joane.", "logic": "\nValueless(joane)\nPyknic(joane)\nXviii(joane)\nUntitled(joane)\nUnmourned(joane)\nConcertina(joane, kalli)\nBroaden(joane, kalli)\nUntitled(kalli)\nPurvey(kalli, joane)\nBroaden(kalli, joane)\nforall x (Untitled(x) and Concertina(x, joane) -> Xviii(x))\nConcertina(joane, kalli) and Broaden(kalli, joane) -> Broaden(joane, kalli)\nforall x (Untitled(x) -> Purvey(x, joane))\nBroaden(joane, kalli) and Untitled(joane) -> Concertina(joane, kalli)\nforall x (Concertina(x, kalli) and Valueless(kalli) -> Purvey(kalli, joane))\nforall x (Pyknic(x) and Broaden(x, joane) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Broaden(x, joane) -> Concertina(x, joane))\nforall x (Xviii(x) and Concertina(x, joane) -> Concertina(joane, kalli))\n\nConcertina(kalli, joane)\n\nBroaden(kalli, joane) and forall x (Broaden(x, joane) -> Concertina(x, joane)) -> therefore Concertina(kalli, joane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The loella is perigonal. The loella is flukey. The loella is sulphurous. The loella is graceful. The loella is breathless. The loella beacon the elsy. The loella serve the elsy. The elsy is graceful. The elsy probate the loella. The elsy serve the loella. If something is graceful and it beacon the loella then it is sulphurous. If the loella beacon the elsy and the elsy serve the loella then the loella serve the elsy. If something is graceful then it probate the loella. If the loella serve the elsy and the loella is graceful then the loella beacon the elsy. If something beacon the elsy and the elsy is perigonal then the elsy probate the loella. If something is flukey and it serve the loella then it is sulphurous. If something serve the loella then it beacon the loella. If something is sulphurous and it beacon the loella then the loella beacon the elsy. The loella does not like the loella.", "logic": "\nPerigonal(loella)\nFlukey(loella)\nSulphurous(loella)\nGraceful(loella)\nBreathless(loella)\nBeacon(loella, elsy)\nServe(loella, elsy)\nGraceful(elsy)\nProbate(elsy, loella)\nServe(elsy, loella)\nforall x (Graceful(x) and Beacon(x, loella) -> Sulphurous(x))\nBeacon(loella, elsy) and Serve(elsy, loella) -> Serve(loella, elsy)\nforall x (Graceful(x) -> Probate(x, loella))\nServe(loella, elsy) and Graceful(loella) -> Beacon(loella, elsy)\nforall x (Beacon(x, elsy) and Perigonal(elsy) -> Probate(elsy, loella))\nforall x (Flukey(x) and Serve(x, loella) -> Sulphurous(x))\nforall x (Serve(x, loella) -> Beacon(x, loella))\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) and Beacon(x, loella) -> Beacon(loella, elsy))\n\nnot Probate(loella, loella)\n\nGraceful(loella) and forall x (Graceful(x) -> Probate(x, loella)) -> therefore Probate(loella, loella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The keene is sapphic. The keene is pugnacious. The keene is pecuniary. The keene is jolted. The keene is unoccupied. The keene void the charil. The keene forget the charil. The charil is jolted. The charil toast the keene. The charil forget the keene. If something is jolted and it void the keene then it is pecuniary. If the keene void the charil and the charil forget the keene then the keene forget the charil. If something is jolted then it toast the keene. If the keene forget the charil and the keene is jolted then the keene void the charil. If something void the charil and the charil is sapphic then the charil toast the keene. If something is pugnacious and it forget the keene then it is pecuniary. If something forget the keene then it void the keene. If something is pecuniary and it void the keene then the keene void the charil. The charil is pecuniary.", "logic": "\nSapphic(keene)\nPugnacious(keene)\nPecuniary(keene)\nJolted(keene)\nUnoccupied(keene)\nVoid(keene, charil)\nForget(keene, charil)\nJolted(charil)\nToast(charil, keene)\nForget(charil, keene)\nforall x (Jolted(x) and Void(x, keene) -> Pecuniary(x))\nVoid(keene, charil) and Forget(charil, keene) -> Forget(keene, charil)\nforall x (Jolted(x) -> Toast(x, keene))\nForget(keene, charil) and Jolted(keene) -> Void(keene, charil)\nforall x (Void(x, charil) and Sapphic(charil) -> Toast(charil, keene))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) and Forget(x, keene) -> Pecuniary(x))\nforall x (Forget(x, keene) -> Void(x, keene))\nforall x (Pecuniary(x) and Void(x, keene) -> Void(keene, charil))\n\nPecuniary(charil)\n\nForget(charil, keene) and forall x (Forget(x, keene) -> Void(x, keene)) -> therefore Void(charil, keene) Jolted(charil) and Void(charil, keene) and forall x (Jolted(x) and Void(x, keene) -> Pecuniary(x)) -> therefore Pecuniary(charil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The menard is notifiable. The menard is senior. The menard is sinful. The menard is matured. The menard is passerine. The menard bike the wolfgang. The menard underpin the wolfgang. The wolfgang is matured. The wolfgang space the menard. The wolfgang underpin the menard. If something is matured and it bike the menard then it is sinful. If the menard bike the wolfgang and the wolfgang underpin the menard then the menard underpin the wolfgang. If something is matured then it space the menard. If the menard underpin the wolfgang and the menard is matured then the menard bike the wolfgang. If something bike the wolfgang and the wolfgang is notifiable then the wolfgang space the menard. If something is senior and it underpin the menard then it is sinful. If something underpin the menard then it bike the menard. If something is sinful and it bike the menard then the menard bike the wolfgang. The wolfgang is not sinful.", "logic": "\nNotifiable(menard)\nSenior(menard)\nSinful(menard)\nMatured(menard)\nPasserine(menard)\nBike(menard, wolfgang)\nUnderpin(menard, wolfgang)\nMatured(wolfgang)\nSpace(wolfgang, menard)\nUnderpin(wolfgang, menard)\nforall x (Matured(x) and Bike(x, menard) -> Sinful(x))\nBike(menard, wolfgang) and Underpin(wolfgang, menard) -> Underpin(menard, wolfgang)\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Space(x, menard))\nUnderpin(menard, wolfgang) and Matured(menard) -> Bike(menard, wolfgang)\nforall x (Bike(x, wolfgang) and Notifiable(wolfgang) -> Space(wolfgang, menard))\nforall x (Senior(x) and Underpin(x, menard) -> Sinful(x))\nforall x (Underpin(x, menard) -> Bike(x, menard))\nforall x (Sinful(x) and Bike(x, menard) -> Bike(menard, wolfgang))\n\nnot Sinful(wolfgang)\n\nUnderpin(wolfgang, menard) and forall x (Underpin(x, menard) -> Bike(x, menard)) -> therefore Bike(wolfgang, menard) Matured(wolfgang) and Bike(wolfgang, menard) and forall x (Matured(x) and Bike(x, menard) -> Sinful(x)) -> therefore Sinful(wolfgang)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The adolphus is pinnatifid. The adolphus is garbled. The adolphus is spry. The adolphus is clad. The adolphus is exogenic. The adolphus marinate the demetrius. The adolphus orphan the demetrius. The demetrius is clad. The demetrius avalanche the adolphus. The demetrius orphan the adolphus. If something is clad and it marinate the adolphus then it is spry. If the adolphus marinate the demetrius and the demetrius orphan the adolphus then the adolphus orphan the demetrius. If something is clad then it avalanche the adolphus. If the adolphus orphan the demetrius and the adolphus is clad then the adolphus marinate the demetrius. If something marinate the demetrius and the demetrius is pinnatifid then the demetrius avalanche the adolphus. If something is garbled and it orphan the adolphus then it is spry. If something orphan the adolphus then it marinate the adolphus. If something is spry and it marinate the adolphus then the adolphus marinate the demetrius. The adolphus does not need the adolphus.", "logic": "\nPinnatifid(adolphus)\nGarbled(adolphus)\nSpry(adolphus)\nClad(adolphus)\nExogenic(adolphus)\nMarinate(adolphus, demetrius)\nOrphan(adolphus, demetrius)\nClad(demetrius)\nAvalanche(demetrius, adolphus)\nOrphan(demetrius, adolphus)\nforall x (Clad(x) and Marinate(x, adolphus) -> Spry(x))\nMarinate(adolphus, demetrius) and Orphan(demetrius, adolphus) -> Orphan(adolphus, demetrius)\nforall x (Clad(x) -> Avalanche(x, adolphus))\nOrphan(adolphus, demetrius) and Clad(adolphus) -> Marinate(adolphus, demetrius)\nforall x (Marinate(x, demetrius) and Pinnatifid(demetrius) -> Avalanche(demetrius, adolphus))\nforall x (Garbled(x) and Orphan(x, adolphus) -> Spry(x))\nforall x (Orphan(x, adolphus) -> Marinate(x, adolphus))\nforall x (Spry(x) and Marinate(x, adolphus) -> Marinate(adolphus, demetrius))\n\nnot Marinate(adolphus, adolphus)\n\nforall x (Orphan(x, adolphus) -> Marinate(x, adolphus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The heloise is kampuchean. The heloise is motivated. The heloise is decorous. The heloise is nephritic. The heloise is adorned. The heloise frost the patty. The heloise murk the patty. The patty is nephritic. The patty fringe the heloise. The patty murk the heloise. If something is nephritic and it frost the heloise then it is decorous. If the heloise frost the patty and the patty murk the heloise then the heloise murk the patty. If something is nephritic then it fringe the heloise. If the heloise murk the patty and the heloise is nephritic then the heloise frost the patty. If something frost the patty and the patty is kampuchean then the patty fringe the heloise. If something is motivated and it murk the heloise then it is decorous. If something murk the heloise then it frost the heloise. If something is decorous and it frost the heloise then the heloise frost the patty. The patty murk the patty.", "logic": "\nKampuchean(heloise)\nMotivated(heloise)\nDecorous(heloise)\nNephritic(heloise)\nAdorned(heloise)\nFrost(heloise, patty)\nMurk(heloise, patty)\nNephritic(patty)\nFringe(patty, heloise)\nMurk(patty, heloise)\nforall x (Nephritic(x) and Frost(x, heloise) -> Decorous(x))\nFrost(heloise, patty) and Murk(patty, heloise) -> Murk(heloise, patty)\nforall x (Nephritic(x) -> Fringe(x, heloise))\nMurk(heloise, patty) and Nephritic(heloise) -> Frost(heloise, patty)\nforall x (Frost(x, patty) and Kampuchean(patty) -> Fringe(patty, heloise))\nforall x (Motivated(x) and Murk(x, heloise) -> Decorous(x))\nforall x (Murk(x, heloise) -> Frost(x, heloise))\nforall x (Decorous(x) and Frost(x, heloise) -> Frost(heloise, patty))\n\nMurk(patty, patty)\n\nMurk(patty, patty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The quinlan is motional. The quinlan is unworried. The quinlan is dizygotic. The quinlan is optative. The quinlan is soprano. The quinlan evidence the paige. The quinlan forfeit the paige. The paige is optative. The paige simmer the quinlan. The paige forfeit the quinlan. If something is optative and it evidence the quinlan then it is dizygotic. If the quinlan evidence the paige and the paige forfeit the quinlan then the quinlan forfeit the paige. If something is optative then it simmer the quinlan. If the quinlan forfeit the paige and the quinlan is optative then the quinlan evidence the paige. If something evidence the paige and the paige is motional then the paige simmer the quinlan. If something is unworried and it forfeit the quinlan then it is dizygotic. If something forfeit the quinlan then it evidence the quinlan. If something is dizygotic and it evidence the quinlan then the quinlan evidence the paige. The paige does not need the paige.", "logic": "\nMotional(quinlan)\nUnworried(quinlan)\nDizygotic(quinlan)\nOptative(quinlan)\nSoprano(quinlan)\nEvidence(quinlan, paige)\nForfeit(quinlan, paige)\nOptative(paige)\nSimmer(paige, quinlan)\nForfeit(paige, quinlan)\nforall x (Optative(x) and Evidence(x, quinlan) -> Dizygotic(x))\nEvidence(quinlan, paige) and Forfeit(paige, quinlan) -> Forfeit(quinlan, paige)\nforall x (Optative(x) -> Simmer(x, quinlan))\nForfeit(quinlan, paige) and Optative(quinlan) -> Evidence(quinlan, paige)\nforall x (Evidence(x, paige) and Motional(paige) -> Simmer(paige, quinlan))\nforall x (Unworried(x) and Forfeit(x, quinlan) -> Dizygotic(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x, quinlan) -> Evidence(x, quinlan))\nforall x (Dizygotic(x) and Evidence(x, quinlan) -> Evidence(quinlan, paige))\n\nnot Evidence(paige, paige)\n\nnot Evidence(paige, paige) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The elton is foggy. The elton is sidelong. The elton is underage. The elton is lipophilic. The elton is autoecious. The elton bituminise the brock. The elton blitz the brock. The brock is lipophilic. The brock induce the elton. The brock blitz the elton. If something is lipophilic and it bituminise the elton then it is underage. If the elton bituminise the brock and the brock blitz the elton then the elton blitz the brock. If something is lipophilic then it induce the elton. If the elton blitz the brock and the elton is lipophilic then the elton bituminise the brock. If something bituminise the brock and the brock is foggy then the brock induce the elton. If something is sidelong and it blitz the elton then it is underage. If something blitz the elton then it bituminise the elton. If something is underage and it bituminise the elton then the elton bituminise the brock. The elton induce the brock.", "logic": "\nFoggy(elton)\nSidelong(elton)\nUnderage(elton)\nLipophilic(elton)\nAutoecious(elton)\nBituminise(elton, brock)\nBlitz(elton, brock)\nLipophilic(brock)\nInduce(brock, elton)\nBlitz(brock, elton)\nforall x (Lipophilic(x) and Bituminise(x, elton) -> Underage(x))\nBituminise(elton, brock) and Blitz(brock, elton) -> Blitz(elton, brock)\nforall x (Lipophilic(x) -> Induce(x, elton))\nBlitz(elton, brock) and Lipophilic(elton) -> Bituminise(elton, brock)\nforall x (Bituminise(x, brock) and Foggy(brock) -> Induce(brock, elton))\nforall x (Sidelong(x) and Blitz(x, elton) -> Underage(x))\nforall x (Blitz(x, elton) -> Bituminise(x, elton))\nforall x (Underage(x) and Bituminise(x, elton) -> Bituminise(elton, brock))\n\nInduce(elton, brock)\n\nInduce(elton, brock) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The rory is snuffling. The rory is liveborn. The rory is leafed. The rory is inorganic. The rory is unvaried. The rory undercoat the gill. The rory miniate the gill. The gill is inorganic. The gill bastardize the rory. The gill miniate the rory. If something is inorganic and it undercoat the rory then it is leafed. If the rory undercoat the gill and the gill miniate the rory then the rory miniate the gill. If something is inorganic then it bastardize the rory. If the rory miniate the gill and the rory is inorganic then the rory undercoat the gill. If something undercoat the gill and the gill is snuffling then the gill bastardize the rory. If something is liveborn and it miniate the rory then it is leafed. If something miniate the rory then it undercoat the rory. If something is leafed and it undercoat the rory then the rory undercoat the gill. The gill is not unvaried.", "logic": "\nSnuffling(rory)\nLiveborn(rory)\nLeafed(rory)\nInorganic(rory)\nUnvaried(rory)\nUndercoat(rory, gill)\nMiniate(rory, gill)\nInorganic(gill)\nBastardize(gill, rory)\nMiniate(gill, rory)\nforall x (Inorganic(x) and Undercoat(x, rory) -> Leafed(x))\nUndercoat(rory, gill) and Miniate(gill, rory) -> Miniate(rory, gill)\nforall x (Inorganic(x) -> Bastardize(x, rory))\nMiniate(rory, gill) and Inorganic(rory) -> Undercoat(rory, gill)\nforall x (Undercoat(x, gill) and Snuffling(gill) -> Bastardize(gill, rory))\nforall x (Liveborn(x) and Miniate(x, rory) -> Leafed(x))\nforall x (Miniate(x, rory) -> Undercoat(x, rory))\nforall x (Leafed(x) and Undercoat(x, rory) -> Undercoat(rory, gill))\n\nnot Unvaried(gill)\n\nnot Unvaried(gill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The renee is mercurial. The renee is neuralgic. The renee is vaccinated. The renee is illicit. The renee is asphaltic. The renee flagellate the rosalynd. The renee scram the rosalynd. The rosalynd is illicit. The rosalynd restate the renee. The rosalynd scram the renee. If something is illicit and it flagellate the renee then it is vaccinated. If the renee flagellate the rosalynd and the rosalynd scram the renee then the renee scram the rosalynd. If something is illicit then it restate the renee. If the renee scram the rosalynd and the renee is illicit then the renee flagellate the rosalynd. If something flagellate the rosalynd and the rosalynd is mercurial then the rosalynd restate the renee. If something is neuralgic and it scram the renee then it is vaccinated. If something scram the renee then it flagellate the renee. If something is vaccinated and it flagellate the renee then the renee flagellate the rosalynd. The rosalynd is neuralgic.", "logic": "\nMercurial(renee)\nNeuralgic(renee)\nVaccinated(renee)\nIllicit(renee)\nAsphaltic(renee)\nFlagellate(renee, rosalynd)\nScram(renee, rosalynd)\nIllicit(rosalynd)\nRestate(rosalynd, renee)\nScram(rosalynd, renee)\nforall x (Illicit(x) and Flagellate(x, renee) -> Vaccinated(x))\nFlagellate(renee, rosalynd) and Scram(rosalynd, renee) -> Scram(renee, rosalynd)\nforall x (Illicit(x) -> Restate(x, renee))\nScram(renee, rosalynd) and Illicit(renee) -> Flagellate(renee, rosalynd)\nforall x (Flagellate(x, rosalynd) and Mercurial(rosalynd) -> Restate(rosalynd, renee))\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) and Scram(x, renee) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Scram(x, renee) -> Flagellate(x, renee))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Flagellate(x, renee) -> Flagellate(renee, rosalynd))\n\nNeuralgic(rosalynd)\n\nNeuralgic(rosalynd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The lurline is chummy. The lurline is unpointed. The lurline is atrip. Red, unpointed people are atrip. If the lurline is moonlit then the lurline is unpointed. All moonlit people are chummy. If someone is chummy then they are unpointed. If the lurline is unpointed and the lurline is moonlit then the lurline is plundering. Red, moonlit people are atrip. If someone is chummy and atrip then they are moonlit. Rough people are atrip. The lurline is atrip.", "logic": "\nChummy(lurline)\nUnpointed(lurline)\nAtrip(lurline)\nforall x (Plundering(x) and Unpointed(x) -> Atrip(x))\nMoonlit(lurline) -> Unpointed(lurline)\nforall x (Moonlit(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nUnpointed(lurline) and Moonlit(lurline) -> Plundering(lurline)\nforall x (Plundering(x) and Moonlit(x) -> Atrip(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and Atrip(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Atrip(x))\n\nAtrip(lurline)\n\ntherefore Atrip(lurline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "The bobbie is willful. The bobbie is ample. The bobbie is parametric. Red, ample people are parametric. If the bobbie is unpierced then the bobbie is ample. All unpierced people are willful. If someone is willful then they are ample. If the bobbie is ample and the bobbie is unpierced then the bobbie is albitic. Red, unpierced people are parametric. If someone is willful and parametric then they are unpierced. Rough people are parametric. The bobbie is not willful.", "logic": "\nWillful(bobbie)\nAmple(bobbie)\nParametric(bobbie)\nforall x (Albitic(x) and Ample(x) -> Parametric(x))\nUnpierced(bobbie) -> Ample(bobbie)\nforall x (Unpierced(x) -> Willful(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) -> Ample(x))\nAmple(bobbie) and Unpierced(bobbie) -> Albitic(bobbie)\nforall x (Albitic(x) and Unpierced(x) -> Parametric(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) and Parametric(x) -> Unpierced(x))\nforall x (Ample(x) -> Parametric(x))\n\nnot Willful(bobbie)\n\ntherefore Willful(bobbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "The baily is cytologic. The baily is hempen. The baily is shady. Red, hempen people are shady. If the baily is lifted then the baily is hempen. All lifted people are cytologic. If someone is cytologic then they are hempen. If the baily is hempen and the baily is lifted then the baily is ungoverned. Red, lifted people are shady. If someone is cytologic and shady then they are lifted. Rough people are shady. The baily is lifted.", "logic": "\nCytologic(baily)\nHempen(baily)\nShady(baily)\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and Hempen(x) -> Shady(x))\nLifted(baily) -> Hempen(baily)\nforall x (Lifted(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Cytologic(x) -> Hempen(x))\nHempen(baily) and Lifted(baily) -> Ungoverned(baily)\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and Lifted(x) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Cytologic(x) and Shady(x) -> Lifted(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Shady(x))\n\nLifted(baily)\n\nCytologic(baily) and Shady(baily) and forall x (Cytologic(x) and Shady(x) -> Lifted(x)) -> therefore Lifted(baily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "The rudyard is paid. The rudyard is botuliform. The rudyard is willowy. Red, botuliform people are willowy. If the rudyard is awny then the rudyard is botuliform. All awny people are paid. If someone is paid then they are botuliform. If the rudyard is botuliform and the rudyard is awny then the rudyard is snobby. Red, awny people are willowy. If someone is paid and willowy then they are awny. Rough people are willowy. The rudyard is not awny.", "logic": "\nPaid(rudyard)\nBotuliform(rudyard)\nWillowy(rudyard)\nforall x (Snobby(x) and Botuliform(x) -> Willowy(x))\nAwny(rudyard) -> Botuliform(rudyard)\nforall x (Awny(x) -> Paid(x))\nforall x (Paid(x) -> Botuliform(x))\nBotuliform(rudyard) and Awny(rudyard) -> Snobby(rudyard)\nforall x (Snobby(x) and Awny(x) -> Willowy(x))\nforall x (Paid(x) and Willowy(x) -> Awny(x))\nforall x (Botuliform(x) -> Willowy(x))\n\nnot Awny(rudyard)\n\nPaid(rudyard) and Willowy(rudyard) and forall x (Paid(x) and Willowy(x) -> Awny(x)) -> therefore Awny(rudyard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "The berkeley is mozambican. The berkeley is crisp. The berkeley is nagging. Red, crisp people are nagging. If the berkeley is didactical then the berkeley is crisp. All didactical people are mozambican. If someone is mozambican then they are crisp. If the berkeley is crisp and the berkeley is didactical then the berkeley is colonial. Red, didactical people are nagging. If someone is mozambican and nagging then they are didactical. Rough people are nagging. The berkeley is colonial.", "logic": "\nMozambican(berkeley)\nCrisp(berkeley)\nNagging(berkeley)\nforall x (Colonial(x) and Crisp(x) -> Nagging(x))\nDidactical(berkeley) -> Crisp(berkeley)\nforall x (Didactical(x) -> Mozambican(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> Crisp(x))\nCrisp(berkeley) and Didactical(berkeley) -> Colonial(berkeley)\nforall x (Colonial(x) and Didactical(x) -> Nagging(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) and Nagging(x) -> Didactical(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) -> Nagging(x))\n\nColonial(berkeley)\n\nMozambican(berkeley) and Nagging(berkeley) and forall x (Mozambican(x) and Nagging(x) -> Didactical(x)) -> therefore Didactical(berkeley) Crisp(berkeley) and Didactical(berkeley) and Crisp(berkeley) and Didactical(berkeley) -> Colonial(berkeley) -> therefore Colonial(berkeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "The jennilee is morphemic. The jennilee is viscid. The jennilee is citywide. Red, viscid people are citywide. If the jennilee is unrequited then the jennilee is viscid. All unrequited people are morphemic. If someone is morphemic then they are viscid. If the jennilee is viscid and the jennilee is unrequited then the jennilee is subjacent. Red, unrequited people are citywide. If someone is morphemic and citywide then they are unrequited. Rough people are citywide. The jennilee is not subjacent.", "logic": "\nMorphemic(jennilee)\nViscid(jennilee)\nCitywide(jennilee)\nforall x (Subjacent(x) and Viscid(x) -> Citywide(x))\nUnrequited(jennilee) -> Viscid(jennilee)\nforall x (Unrequited(x) -> Morphemic(x))\nforall x (Morphemic(x) -> Viscid(x))\nViscid(jennilee) and Unrequited(jennilee) -> Subjacent(jennilee)\nforall x (Subjacent(x) and Unrequited(x) -> Citywide(x))\nforall x (Morphemic(x) and Citywide(x) -> Unrequited(x))\nforall x (Viscid(x) -> Citywide(x))\n\nnot Subjacent(jennilee)\n\nMorphemic(jennilee) and Citywide(jennilee) and forall x (Morphemic(x) and Citywide(x) -> Unrequited(x)) -> therefore Unrequited(jennilee) Viscid(jennilee) and Unrequited(jennilee) and Viscid(jennilee) and Unrequited(jennilee) -> Subjacent(jennilee) -> therefore Subjacent(jennilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "The ailey is curst. The ailey is interior. The ailey is biologic. Red, interior people are biologic. If the ailey is mensural then the ailey is interior. All mensural people are curst. If someone is curst then they are interior. If the ailey is interior and the ailey is mensural then the ailey is earlier. Red, mensural people are biologic. If someone is curst and biologic then they are mensural. Rough people are biologic. The ailey does not chase the ailey.", "logic": "\nCurst(ailey)\nInterior(ailey)\nBiologic(ailey)\nforall x (Earlier(x) and Interior(x) -> Biologic(x))\nMensural(ailey) -> Interior(ailey)\nforall x (Mensural(x) -> Curst(x))\nforall x (Curst(x) -> Interior(x))\nInterior(ailey) and Mensural(ailey) -> Earlier(ailey)\nforall x (Earlier(x) and Mensural(x) -> Biologic(x))\nforall x (Curst(x) and Biologic(x) -> Mensural(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Biologic(x))\n\nnot Chases(ailey, ailey)\n\nnot Chases(ailey, ailey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "The rahel is abundant. The rahel is oldline. The rahel is passable. Red, oldline people are passable. If the rahel is pictured then the rahel is oldline. All pictured people are abundant. If someone is abundant then they are oldline. If the rahel is oldline and the rahel is pictured then the rahel is ludicrous. Red, pictured people are passable. If someone is abundant and passable then they are pictured. Rough people are passable. The rahel visits the rahel.", "logic": "\nAbundant(rahel)\nOldline(rahel)\nPassable(rahel)\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) and Oldline(x) -> Passable(x))\nPictured(rahel) -> Oldline(rahel)\nforall x (Pictured(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Abundant(x) -> Oldline(x))\nOldline(rahel) and Pictured(rahel) -> Ludicrous(rahel)\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) and Pictured(x) -> Passable(x))\nforall x (Abundant(x) and Passable(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Oldline(x) -> Passable(x))\n\nVisits(rahel, rahel)\n\nVisits(rahel, rahel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-533"} {"premises": "Rici is avian. Rici is prosy. Rici is not imprecise. Linda is not aculeated. Linda is diagonal. Linda is avian. Linda is imprecise. Linda is matt. Ranique is combative. Ranique is not imprecise. White things are prosy. All aculeated things are prosy. If something is combative then it is not matt. If Ranique is prosy and Ranique is imprecise then Ranique is not diagonal. If something is combative and not matt then it is diagonal. If something is avian and aculeated then it is diagonal. Linda is matt.", "logic": "\nAvian(rici)\nProsy(rici)\nnot Imprecise(rici)\nnot Aculeated(linda)\nDiagonal(linda)\nAvian(linda)\nImprecise(linda)\nMatt(linda)\nCombative(ranique)\nnot Imprecise(ranique)\nforall x (Imprecise(x) -> Prosy(x))\nforall x (Aculeated(x) -> Prosy(x))\nforall x (Combative(x) -> not Matt(x))\nProsy(ranique) and Imprecise(ranique) -> not Diagonal(ranique)\nforall x (Combative(x) and not Matt(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Avian(x) and Aculeated(x) -> Diagonal(x))\n\nMatt(linda)\n\ntherefore Matt(linda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Roland is unproven. Roland is scared. Roland is not telltale. Christy is not unglazed. Christy is dissoluble. Christy is unproven. Christy is telltale. Christy is acanthotic. Brendan is sanative. Brendan is not telltale. White things are scared. All unglazed things are scared. If something is sanative then it is not acanthotic. If Brendan is scared and Brendan is telltale then Brendan is not dissoluble. If something is sanative and not acanthotic then it is dissoluble. If something is unproven and unglazed then it is dissoluble. Roland is not unproven.", "logic": "\nUnproven(roland)\nScared(roland)\nnot Telltale(roland)\nnot Unglazed(christy)\nDissoluble(christy)\nUnproven(christy)\nTelltale(christy)\nAcanthotic(christy)\nSanative(brendan)\nnot Telltale(brendan)\nforall x (Telltale(x) -> Scared(x))\nforall x (Unglazed(x) -> Scared(x))\nforall x (Sanative(x) -> not Acanthotic(x))\nScared(brendan) and Telltale(brendan) -> not Dissoluble(brendan)\nforall x (Sanative(x) and not Acanthotic(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Unproven(x) and Unglazed(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\n\nnot Unproven(roland)\n\ntherefore Unproven(roland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Todd is final. Todd is sweptwing. Todd is not orbitual. Joete is not cognisant. Joete is deictic. Joete is final. Joete is orbitual. Joete is epideictic. Rosalynd is septic. Rosalynd is not orbitual. White things are sweptwing. All cognisant things are sweptwing. If something is septic then it is not epideictic. If Rosalynd is sweptwing and Rosalynd is orbitual then Rosalynd is not deictic. If something is septic and not epideictic then it is deictic. If something is final and cognisant then it is deictic. Joete is sweptwing.", "logic": "\nFinal(todd)\nSweptwing(todd)\nnot Orbitual(todd)\nnot Cognisant(joete)\nDeictic(joete)\nFinal(joete)\nOrbitual(joete)\nEpideictic(joete)\nSeptic(rosalynd)\nnot Orbitual(rosalynd)\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Sweptwing(x))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) -> Sweptwing(x))\nforall x (Septic(x) -> not Epideictic(x))\nSweptwing(rosalynd) and Orbitual(rosalynd) -> not Deictic(rosalynd)\nforall x (Septic(x) and not Epideictic(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Final(x) and Cognisant(x) -> Deictic(x))\n\nSweptwing(joete)\n\nOrbitual(joete) and forall x (Orbitual(x) -> Sweptwing(x)) -> therefore Sweptwing(joete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Easter is ingrowing. Easter is stalemated. Easter is not affixial. Barton is not tributary. Barton is prevenient. Barton is ingrowing. Barton is affixial. Barton is bashful. Blythe is undersized. Blythe is not affixial. White things are stalemated. All tributary things are stalemated. If something is undersized then it is not bashful. If Blythe is stalemated and Blythe is affixial then Blythe is not prevenient. If something is undersized and not bashful then it is prevenient. If something is ingrowing and tributary then it is prevenient. Barton is not stalemated.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(easter)\nStalemated(easter)\nnot Affixial(easter)\nnot Tributary(barton)\nPrevenient(barton)\nIngrowing(barton)\nAffixial(barton)\nBashful(barton)\nUndersized(blythe)\nnot Affixial(blythe)\nforall x (Affixial(x) -> Stalemated(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) -> Stalemated(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> not Bashful(x))\nStalemated(blythe) and Affixial(blythe) -> not Prevenient(blythe)\nforall x (Undersized(x) and not Bashful(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) and Tributary(x) -> Prevenient(x))\n\nnot Stalemated(barton)\n\nAffixial(barton) and forall x (Affixial(x) -> Stalemated(x)) -> therefore Stalemated(barton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Lissy is unneeded. Lissy is ceilinged. Lissy is not live. Price is not aliphatic. Price is anticipant. Price is unneeded. Price is live. Price is spirited. Raquel is flammable. Raquel is not live. White things are ceilinged. All aliphatic things are ceilinged. If something is flammable then it is not spirited. If Raquel is ceilinged and Raquel is live then Raquel is not anticipant. If something is flammable and not spirited then it is anticipant. If something is unneeded and aliphatic then it is anticipant. Raquel is anticipant.", "logic": "\nUnneeded(lissy)\nCeilinged(lissy)\nnot Live(lissy)\nnot Aliphatic(price)\nAnticipant(price)\nUnneeded(price)\nLive(price)\nSpirited(price)\nFlammable(raquel)\nnot Live(raquel)\nforall x (Live(x) -> Ceilinged(x))\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) -> Ceilinged(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> not Spirited(x))\nCeilinged(raquel) and Live(raquel) -> not Anticipant(raquel)\nforall x (Flammable(x) and not Spirited(x) -> Anticipant(x))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and Aliphatic(x) -> Anticipant(x))\n\nAnticipant(raquel)\n\nFlammable(raquel) and forall x (Flammable(x) -> not Spirited(x)) -> therefore not Spirited(raquel) Flammable(raquel) and not Spirited(raquel) and forall x (Flammable(x) and not Spirited(x) -> Anticipant(x)) -> therefore Anticipant(raquel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Pamela is rawboned. Pamela is nauruan. Pamela is not negative. Anthia is not urbanised. Anthia is inhabited. Anthia is rawboned. Anthia is negative. Anthia is arterial. Jennica is witless. Jennica is not negative. White things are nauruan. All urbanised things are nauruan. If something is witless then it is not arterial. If Jennica is nauruan and Jennica is negative then Jennica is not inhabited. If something is witless and not arterial then it is inhabited. If something is rawboned and urbanised then it is inhabited. Jennica is not inhabited.", "logic": "\nRawboned(pamela)\nNauruan(pamela)\nnot Negative(pamela)\nnot Urbanised(anthia)\nInhabited(anthia)\nRawboned(anthia)\nNegative(anthia)\nArterial(anthia)\nWitless(jennica)\nnot Negative(jennica)\nforall x (Negative(x) -> Nauruan(x))\nforall x (Urbanised(x) -> Nauruan(x))\nforall x (Witless(x) -> not Arterial(x))\nNauruan(jennica) and Negative(jennica) -> not Inhabited(jennica)\nforall x (Witless(x) and not Arterial(x) -> Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Rawboned(x) and Urbanised(x) -> Inhabited(x))\n\nnot Inhabited(jennica)\n\nWitless(jennica) and forall x (Witless(x) -> not Arterial(x)) -> therefore not Arterial(jennica) Witless(jennica) and not Arterial(jennica) and forall x (Witless(x) and not Arterial(x) -> Inhabited(x)) -> therefore Inhabited(jennica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Guenevere is fledgeling. Guenevere is discovered. Guenevere is not seraphic. Barty is not chesty. Barty is sibilant. Barty is fledgeling. Barty is seraphic. Barty is tame. Jennette is septate. Jennette is not seraphic. White things are discovered. All chesty things are discovered. If something is septate then it is not tame. If Jennette is discovered and Jennette is seraphic then Jennette is not sibilant. If something is septate and not tame then it is sibilant. If something is fledgeling and chesty then it is sibilant. Jennette is not discovered.", "logic": "\nFledgeling(guenevere)\nDiscovered(guenevere)\nnot Seraphic(guenevere)\nnot Chesty(barty)\nSibilant(barty)\nFledgeling(barty)\nSeraphic(barty)\nTame(barty)\nSeptate(jennette)\nnot Seraphic(jennette)\nforall x (Seraphic(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Chesty(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Septate(x) -> not Tame(x))\nDiscovered(jennette) and Seraphic(jennette) -> not Sibilant(jennette)\nforall x (Septate(x) and not Tame(x) -> Sibilant(x))\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) and Chesty(x) -> Sibilant(x))\n\nnot Discovered(jennette)\n\nforall x (Seraphic(x) -> Discovered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Lothar is postictal. Lothar is scarce. Lothar is not blurry. Jeremiah is not xciii. Jeremiah is augmented. Jeremiah is postictal. Jeremiah is blurry. Jeremiah is primaeval. Catriona is succeeding. Catriona is not blurry. White things are scarce. All xciii things are scarce. If something is succeeding then it is not primaeval. If Catriona is scarce and Catriona is blurry then Catriona is not augmented. If something is succeeding and not primaeval then it is augmented. If something is postictal and xciii then it is augmented. Lothar is augmented.", "logic": "\nPostictal(lothar)\nScarce(lothar)\nnot Blurry(lothar)\nnot Xciii(jeremiah)\nAugmented(jeremiah)\nPostictal(jeremiah)\nBlurry(jeremiah)\nPrimaeval(jeremiah)\nSucceeding(catriona)\nnot Blurry(catriona)\nforall x (Blurry(x) -> Scarce(x))\nforall x (Xciii(x) -> Scarce(x))\nforall x (Succeeding(x) -> not Primaeval(x))\nScarce(catriona) and Blurry(catriona) -> not Augmented(catriona)\nforall x (Succeeding(x) and not Primaeval(x) -> Augmented(x))\nforall x (Postictal(x) and Xciii(x) -> Augmented(x))\n\nAugmented(lothar)\n\nforall x (Succeeding(x) and not Primaeval(x) -> Augmented(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Osborne is malthusian. Osborne is galore. Osborne is not indonesian. Sophey is not unfrozen. Sophey is spheric. Sophey is malthusian. Sophey is indonesian. Sophey is beery. Silvanus is anamnestic. Silvanus is not indonesian. White things are galore. All unfrozen things are galore. If something is anamnestic then it is not beery. If Silvanus is galore and Silvanus is indonesian then Silvanus is not spheric. If something is anamnestic and not beery then it is spheric. If something is malthusian and unfrozen then it is spheric. Osborne is not anamnestic.", "logic": "\nMalthusian(osborne)\nGalore(osborne)\nnot Indonesian(osborne)\nnot Unfrozen(sophey)\nSpheric(sophey)\nMalthusian(sophey)\nIndonesian(sophey)\nBeery(sophey)\nAnamnestic(silvanus)\nnot Indonesian(silvanus)\nforall x (Indonesian(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Anamnestic(x) -> not Beery(x))\nGalore(silvanus) and Indonesian(silvanus) -> not Spheric(silvanus)\nforall x (Anamnestic(x) and not Beery(x) -> Spheric(x))\nforall x (Malthusian(x) and Unfrozen(x) -> Spheric(x))\n\nnot Anamnestic(osborne)\n\nnot Anamnestic(osborne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Kristine is euphoriant. Kristine is unsaved. Kristine is not glaring. Karlen is not fifteen. Karlen is clockwise. Karlen is euphoriant. Karlen is glaring. Karlen is central. Darcy is unpainted. Darcy is not glaring. White things are unsaved. All fifteen things are unsaved. If something is unpainted then it is not central. If Darcy is unsaved and Darcy is glaring then Darcy is not clockwise. If something is unpainted and not central then it is clockwise. If something is euphoriant and fifteen then it is clockwise. Kristine is central.", "logic": "\nEuphoriant(kristine)\nUnsaved(kristine)\nnot Glaring(kristine)\nnot Fifteen(karlen)\nClockwise(karlen)\nEuphoriant(karlen)\nGlaring(karlen)\nCentral(karlen)\nUnpainted(darcy)\nnot Glaring(darcy)\nforall x (Glaring(x) -> Unsaved(x))\nforall x (Fifteen(x) -> Unsaved(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> not Central(x))\nUnsaved(darcy) and Glaring(darcy) -> not Clockwise(darcy)\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and not Central(x) -> Clockwise(x))\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) and Fifteen(x) -> Clockwise(x))\n\nCentral(kristine)\n\nCentral(kristine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Cara is unworldly. Cara is receivable. Cara is not punk. Dotty is not arachnoid. Dotty is euphoric. Dotty is unworldly. Dotty is punk. Dotty is fierce. Dorette is homozygous. Dorette is not punk. White things are receivable. All arachnoid things are receivable. If something is homozygous then it is not fierce. If Dorette is receivable and Dorette is punk then Dorette is not euphoric. If something is homozygous and not fierce then it is euphoric. If something is unworldly and arachnoid then it is euphoric. Dotty is not homozygous.", "logic": "\nUnworldly(cara)\nReceivable(cara)\nnot Punk(cara)\nnot Arachnoid(dotty)\nEuphoric(dotty)\nUnworldly(dotty)\nPunk(dotty)\nFierce(dotty)\nHomozygous(dorette)\nnot Punk(dorette)\nforall x (Punk(x) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Arachnoid(x) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Homozygous(x) -> not Fierce(x))\nReceivable(dorette) and Punk(dorette) -> not Euphoric(dorette)\nforall x (Homozygous(x) and not Fierce(x) -> Euphoric(x))\nforall x (Unworldly(x) and Arachnoid(x) -> Euphoric(x))\n\nnot Homozygous(dotty)\n\nnot Homozygous(dotty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Nonna is fistulous. Nonna is medullated. Nonna is not remorseful. Raphael is not neither. Raphael is idiomatic. Raphael is fistulous. Raphael is remorseful. Raphael is populated. Justis is baronial. Justis is not remorseful. White things are medullated. All neither things are medullated. If something is baronial then it is not populated. If Justis is medullated and Justis is remorseful then Justis is not idiomatic. If something is baronial and not populated then it is idiomatic. If something is fistulous and neither then it is idiomatic. Justis is neither.", "logic": "\nFistulous(nonna)\nMedullated(nonna)\nnot Remorseful(nonna)\nnot Neither(raphael)\nIdiomatic(raphael)\nFistulous(raphael)\nRemorseful(raphael)\nPopulated(raphael)\nBaronial(justis)\nnot Remorseful(justis)\nforall x (Remorseful(x) -> Medullated(x))\nforall x (Neither(x) -> Medullated(x))\nforall x (Baronial(x) -> not Populated(x))\nMedullated(justis) and Remorseful(justis) -> not Idiomatic(justis)\nforall x (Baronial(x) and not Populated(x) -> Idiomatic(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) and Neither(x) -> Idiomatic(x))\n\nNeither(justis)\n\nNeither(justis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-859"} {"premises": "Aubrette is homegrown. Aubrette is reduced. Aubrette is gregorian. Aubrette is familial. Aubrette is indictable. Aubrette is lowered. Aubrette is absorptive. Kamilah is reduced. Kamilah is absorptive. Garv is homegrown. Garv is reduced. Garv is gregorian. Garv is familial. Garv is indictable. Garv is lowered. Garv is absorptive. If someone is reduced then they are gregorian. Nice people are lowered. All reduced, familial people are gregorian. Green people are familial. Green, absorptive people are homegrown. If someone is familial then they are homegrown. Garv is familial.", "logic": "\nHomegrown(aubrette)\nReduced(aubrette)\nGregorian(aubrette)\nFamilial(aubrette)\nIndictable(aubrette)\nLowered(aubrette)\nAbsorptive(aubrette)\nReduced(kamilah)\nAbsorptive(kamilah)\nHomegrown(garv)\nReduced(garv)\nGregorian(garv)\nFamilial(garv)\nIndictable(garv)\nLowered(garv)\nAbsorptive(garv)\nforall x (Reduced(x) -> Gregorian(x))\nforall x (Gregorian(x) -> Lowered(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) and Familial(x) -> Gregorian(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) -> Familial(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) and Absorptive(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Familial(x) -> Homegrown(x))\n\nFamilial(garv)\n\ntherefore Familial(garv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-319"} {"premises": "Aile is foiled. Aile is burnable. Aile is peckish. Aile is spinnable. Aile is both. Aile is mangled. Aile is defoliated. Blythe is burnable. Blythe is defoliated. Susette is foiled. Susette is burnable. Susette is peckish. Susette is spinnable. Susette is both. Susette is mangled. Susette is defoliated. If someone is burnable then they are peckish. Nice people are mangled. All burnable, spinnable people are peckish. Green people are spinnable. Green, defoliated people are foiled. If someone is spinnable then they are foiled. Susette is not foiled.", "logic": "\nFoiled(aile)\nBurnable(aile)\nPeckish(aile)\nSpinnable(aile)\nBoth(aile)\nMangled(aile)\nDefoliated(aile)\nBurnable(blythe)\nDefoliated(blythe)\nFoiled(susette)\nBurnable(susette)\nPeckish(susette)\nSpinnable(susette)\nBoth(susette)\nMangled(susette)\nDefoliated(susette)\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Peckish(x))\nforall x (Peckish(x) -> Mangled(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) and Spinnable(x) -> Peckish(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) and Defoliated(x) -> Foiled(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> Foiled(x))\n\nnot Foiled(susette)\n\ntherefore Foiled(susette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-319"} {"premises": "Stesha is phylliform. Stesha is blebbed. Stesha is auditory. Stesha is unshielded. Stesha is decorated. Stesha is prickly. Stesha is empurpled. Gerome is blebbed. Gerome is empurpled. Aggy is phylliform. Aggy is blebbed. Aggy is auditory. Aggy is unshielded. Aggy is decorated. Aggy is prickly. Aggy is empurpled. If someone is blebbed then they are auditory. Nice people are prickly. All blebbed, unshielded people are auditory. Green people are unshielded. Green, empurpled people are phylliform. If someone is unshielded then they are phylliform. Gerome is phylliform.", "logic": "\nPhylliform(stesha)\nBlebbed(stesha)\nAuditory(stesha)\nUnshielded(stesha)\nDecorated(stesha)\nPrickly(stesha)\nEmpurpled(stesha)\nBlebbed(gerome)\nEmpurpled(gerome)\nPhylliform(aggy)\nBlebbed(aggy)\nAuditory(aggy)\nUnshielded(aggy)\nDecorated(aggy)\nPrickly(aggy)\nEmpurpled(aggy)\nforall x (Blebbed(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Auditory(x) -> Prickly(x))\nforall x (Blebbed(x) and Unshielded(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Blebbed(x) -> Unshielded(x))\nforall x (Blebbed(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Unshielded(x) -> Phylliform(x))\n\nPhylliform(gerome)\n\nBlebbed(gerome) and Empurpled(gerome) and forall x (Blebbed(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Phylliform(x)) -> therefore Phylliform(gerome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-319"} {"premises": "Brewster is joyous. Brewster is dangerous. Brewster is lamarckian. Brewster is demulcent. Brewster is cockeyed. Brewster is unabridged. Brewster is clear. Mohan is dangerous. Mohan is clear. Suellen is joyous. Suellen is dangerous. Suellen is lamarckian. Suellen is demulcent. Suellen is cockeyed. Suellen is unabridged. Suellen is clear. If someone is dangerous then they are lamarckian. Nice people are unabridged. All dangerous, demulcent people are lamarckian. Green people are demulcent. Green, clear people are joyous. If someone is demulcent then they are joyous. Mohan is not demulcent.", "logic": "\nJoyous(brewster)\nDangerous(brewster)\nLamarckian(brewster)\nDemulcent(brewster)\nCockeyed(brewster)\nUnabridged(brewster)\nClear(brewster)\nDangerous(mohan)\nClear(mohan)\nJoyous(suellen)\nDangerous(suellen)\nLamarckian(suellen)\nDemulcent(suellen)\nCockeyed(suellen)\nUnabridged(suellen)\nClear(suellen)\nforall x (Dangerous(x) -> Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) -> Unabridged(x))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) and Demulcent(x) -> Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) -> Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) and Clear(x) -> Joyous(x))\nforall x (Demulcent(x) -> Joyous(x))\n\nnot Demulcent(mohan)\n\nDangerous(mohan) and forall x (Dangerous(x) -> Demulcent(x)) -> therefore Demulcent(mohan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-319"} {"premises": "Malissa is sunstruck. Malissa is spiderlike. Malissa is austenitic. Malissa is genital. Malissa is offshore. Malissa is oozy. Malissa is cryogenic. Jocelyn is spiderlike. Jocelyn is cryogenic. Rubia is sunstruck. Rubia is spiderlike. Rubia is austenitic. Rubia is genital. Rubia is offshore. Rubia is oozy. Rubia is cryogenic. If someone is spiderlike then they are austenitic. Nice people are oozy. All spiderlike, genital people are austenitic. Green people are genital. Green, cryogenic people are sunstruck. If someone is genital then they are sunstruck. Jocelyn is oozy.", "logic": "\nSunstruck(malissa)\nSpiderlike(malissa)\nAustenitic(malissa)\nGenital(malissa)\nOffshore(malissa)\nOozy(malissa)\nCryogenic(malissa)\nSpiderlike(jocelyn)\nCryogenic(jocelyn)\nSunstruck(rubia)\nSpiderlike(rubia)\nAustenitic(rubia)\nGenital(rubia)\nOffshore(rubia)\nOozy(rubia)\nCryogenic(rubia)\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Austenitic(x))\nforall x (Austenitic(x) -> Oozy(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) and Genital(x) -> Austenitic(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Genital(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) and Cryogenic(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\n\nOozy(jocelyn)\n\nSpiderlike(jocelyn) and forall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Austenitic(x)) -> therefore Austenitic(jocelyn) Austenitic(jocelyn) and forall x (Austenitic(x) -> Oozy(x)) -> therefore Oozy(jocelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-319"} {"premises": "Prentice is jolty. Prentice is capacious. Prentice is apish. Prentice is exalted. Prentice is revokable. Prentice is florentine. Prentice is ageing. Fara is capacious. Fara is ageing. Jazmin is jolty. Jazmin is capacious. Jazmin is apish. Jazmin is exalted. Jazmin is revokable. Jazmin is florentine. Jazmin is ageing. If someone is capacious then they are apish. Nice people are florentine. All capacious, exalted people are apish. Green people are exalted. Green, ageing people are jolty. If someone is exalted then they are jolty. Fara is not florentine.", "logic": "\nJolty(prentice)\nCapacious(prentice)\nApish(prentice)\nExalted(prentice)\nRevokable(prentice)\nFlorentine(prentice)\nAgeing(prentice)\nCapacious(fara)\nAgeing(fara)\nJolty(jazmin)\nCapacious(jazmin)\nApish(jazmin)\nExalted(jazmin)\nRevokable(jazmin)\nFlorentine(jazmin)\nAgeing(jazmin)\nforall x (Capacious(x) -> Apish(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Capacious(x) and Exalted(x) -> Apish(x))\nforall x (Capacious(x) -> Exalted(x))\nforall x (Capacious(x) and Ageing(x) -> Jolty(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Jolty(x))\n\nnot Florentine(fara)\n\nCapacious(fara) and forall x (Capacious(x) -> Apish(x)) -> therefore Apish(fara) Apish(fara) and forall x (Apish(x) -> Florentine(x)) -> therefore Florentine(fara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-319"} {"premises": "The daniele muster the letta. The letta is busted. If someone ransack the letta then they need the daniele. If someone muster the daniele then the daniele ransack the letta. If someone is busted then they see the daniele. The daniele muster the letta.", "logic": "\nMuster(daniele, letta)\nBusted(letta)\nforall x (Ransack(x, letta) -> Ransack(x, daniele))\nforall x (Muster(x, daniele) -> Ransack(daniele, letta))\nforall x (Busted(x) -> Muster(x, daniele))\n\nMuster(daniele, letta)\n\ntherefore Muster(daniele, letta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The piggy nosedive the delmar. The delmar is benthic. If someone baby the delmar then they need the piggy. If someone nosedive the piggy then the piggy baby the delmar. If someone is benthic then they see the piggy. The piggy does not see the delmar.", "logic": "\nNosedive(piggy, delmar)\nBenthic(delmar)\nforall x (Baby(x, delmar) -> Baby(x, piggy))\nforall x (Nosedive(x, piggy) -> Baby(piggy, delmar))\nforall x (Benthic(x) -> Nosedive(x, piggy))\n\nnot Nosedive(piggy, delmar)\n\ntherefore Nosedive(piggy, delmar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The ellyn subsume the krishna. The krishna is abdominous. If someone clangour the krishna then they need the ellyn. If someone subsume the ellyn then the ellyn clangour the krishna. If someone is abdominous then they see the ellyn. The krishna subsume the ellyn.", "logic": "\nSubsume(ellyn, krishna)\nAbdominous(krishna)\nforall x (Clangour(x, krishna) -> Clangour(x, ellyn))\nforall x (Subsume(x, ellyn) -> Clangour(ellyn, krishna))\nforall x (Abdominous(x) -> Subsume(x, ellyn))\n\nSubsume(krishna, ellyn)\n\nAbdominous(krishna) and forall x (Abdominous(x) -> Subsume(x, ellyn)) -> therefore Subsume(krishna, ellyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The alyson counsel the elka. The elka is aneroid. If someone matte the elka then they need the alyson. If someone counsel the alyson then the alyson matte the elka. If someone is aneroid then they see the alyson. The elka does not see the alyson.", "logic": "\nCounsel(alyson, elka)\nAneroid(elka)\nforall x (Matte(x, elka) -> Matte(x, alyson))\nforall x (Counsel(x, alyson) -> Matte(alyson, elka))\nforall x (Aneroid(x) -> Counsel(x, alyson))\n\nnot Counsel(elka, alyson)\n\nAneroid(elka) and forall x (Aneroid(x) -> Counsel(x, alyson)) -> therefore Counsel(elka, alyson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The nevil conflict the vaclav. The vaclav is alarming. If someone mildew the vaclav then they need the nevil. If someone conflict the nevil then the nevil mildew the vaclav. If someone is alarming then they see the nevil. The nevil mildew the vaclav.", "logic": "\nConflict(nevil, vaclav)\nAlarming(vaclav)\nforall x (Mildew(x, vaclav) -> Mildew(x, nevil))\nforall x (Conflict(x, nevil) -> Mildew(nevil, vaclav))\nforall x (Alarming(x) -> Conflict(x, nevil))\n\nMildew(nevil, vaclav)\n\nAlarming(vaclav) and forall x (Alarming(x) -> Conflict(x, nevil)) -> therefore Conflict(vaclav, nevil) Conflict(vaclav, nevil) and forall x (Conflict(x, nevil) -> Mildew(nevil, vaclav)) -> therefore Mildew(nevil, vaclav)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The herbie ambulate the renaldo. The renaldo is roasted. If someone geminate the renaldo then they need the herbie. If someone ambulate the herbie then the herbie geminate the renaldo. If someone is roasted then they see the herbie. The herbie does not need the renaldo.", "logic": "\nAmbulate(herbie, renaldo)\nRoasted(renaldo)\nforall x (Geminate(x, renaldo) -> Geminate(x, herbie))\nforall x (Ambulate(x, herbie) -> Geminate(herbie, renaldo))\nforall x (Roasted(x) -> Ambulate(x, herbie))\n\nnot Geminate(herbie, renaldo)\n\nRoasted(renaldo) and forall x (Roasted(x) -> Ambulate(x, herbie)) -> therefore Ambulate(renaldo, herbie) Ambulate(renaldo, herbie) and forall x (Ambulate(x, herbie) -> Geminate(herbie, renaldo)) -> therefore Geminate(herbie, renaldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The marjy outbrave the lurlene. The lurlene is roomy. If someone overcome the lurlene then they need the marjy. If someone outbrave the marjy then the marjy overcome the lurlene. If someone is roomy then they see the marjy. The marjy does not see the marjy.", "logic": "\nOutbrave(marjy, lurlene)\nRoomy(lurlene)\nforall x (Overcome(x, lurlene) -> Overcome(x, marjy))\nforall x (Outbrave(x, marjy) -> Overcome(marjy, lurlene))\nforall x (Roomy(x) -> Outbrave(x, marjy))\n\nnot Outbrave(marjy, marjy)\n\nforall x (Roomy(x) -> Outbrave(x, marjy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The abbie book the rosina. The rosina is neotenic. If someone exalt the rosina then they need the abbie. If someone book the abbie then the abbie exalt the rosina. If someone is neotenic then they see the abbie. The rosina exalt the abbie.", "logic": "\nBook(abbie, rosina)\nNeotenic(rosina)\nforall x (Exalt(x, rosina) -> Exalt(x, abbie))\nforall x (Book(x, abbie) -> Exalt(abbie, rosina))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Book(x, abbie))\n\nExalt(rosina, abbie)\n\nforall x (Exalt(x, rosina) -> Exalt(x, abbie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The addis intermit the phineas. The phineas is mushy. If someone platinize the phineas then they need the addis. If someone intermit the addis then the addis platinize the phineas. If someone is mushy then they see the addis. The phineas is not blue.", "logic": "\nIntermit(addis, phineas)\nMushy(phineas)\nforall x (Platinize(x, phineas) -> Platinize(x, addis))\nforall x (Intermit(x, addis) -> Platinize(addis, phineas))\nforall x (Mushy(x) -> Intermit(x, addis))\n\nnot Blue(phineas)\n\nnot Blue(phineas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The elke misname the orelia. The orelia is fatalistic. If someone calk the orelia then they need the elke. If someone misname the elke then the elke calk the orelia. If someone is fatalistic then they see the elke. The elke is fatalistic.", "logic": "\nMisname(elke, orelia)\nFatalistic(orelia)\nforall x (Calk(x, orelia) -> Calk(x, elke))\nforall x (Misname(x, elke) -> Calk(elke, orelia))\nforall x (Fatalistic(x) -> Misname(x, elke))\n\nFatalistic(elke)\n\nFatalistic(elke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The cosette deserve the ardenia. The ardenia is underdone. If someone discontent the ardenia then they need the cosette. If someone deserve the cosette then the cosette discontent the ardenia. If someone is underdone then they see the cosette. The ardenia is not big.", "logic": "\nDeserve(cosette, ardenia)\nUnderdone(ardenia)\nforall x (Discontent(x, ardenia) -> Discontent(x, cosette))\nforall x (Deserve(x, cosette) -> Discontent(cosette, ardenia))\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> Deserve(x, cosette))\n\nnot Big(ardenia)\n\nnot Big(ardenia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The faun streak the sophey. The sophey is refutable. If someone enroll the sophey then they need the faun. If someone streak the faun then the faun enroll the sophey. If someone is refutable then they see the faun. The sophey visits the sophey.", "logic": "\nStreak(faun, sophey)\nRefutable(sophey)\nforall x (Enroll(x, sophey) -> Enroll(x, faun))\nforall x (Streak(x, faun) -> Enroll(faun, sophey))\nforall x (Refutable(x) -> Streak(x, faun))\n\nVisits(sophey, sophey)\n\nVisits(sophey, sophey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "Stormi is cleared. Stormi is unstable. Tansy is not improbable. Tansy is patristic. Tansy is repressing. Tansy is not confiscate. Jeri is not improbable. Jeri is confiscate. Charis is thrillful. Charis is unstable. Charis is repressing. Charis is confiscate. If someone is unstable then they are thrillful. All confiscate people are thrillful. If someone is thrillful then they are unstable. Stormi is unstable.", "logic": "\nCleared(stormi)\nUnstable(stormi)\nnot Improbable(tansy)\nPatristic(tansy)\nRepressing(tansy)\nnot Confiscate(tansy)\nnot Improbable(jeri)\nConfiscate(jeri)\nThrillful(charis)\nUnstable(charis)\nRepressing(charis)\nConfiscate(charis)\nforall x (Unstable(x) -> Thrillful(x))\nforall x (Confiscate(x) -> Thrillful(x))\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Unstable(x))\n\nUnstable(stormi)\n\ntherefore Unstable(stormi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Zulema is icky. Zulema is starchless. Alphonso is not withering. Alphonso is averse. Alphonso is fusible. Alphonso is not bantu. Karlene is not withering. Karlene is bantu. Rebeca is tuberous. Rebeca is starchless. Rebeca is fusible. Rebeca is bantu. If someone is starchless then they are tuberous. All bantu people are tuberous. If someone is tuberous then they are starchless. Rebeca is not bantu.", "logic": "\nIcky(zulema)\nStarchless(zulema)\nnot Withering(alphonso)\nAverse(alphonso)\nFusible(alphonso)\nnot Bantu(alphonso)\nnot Withering(karlene)\nBantu(karlene)\nTuberous(rebeca)\nStarchless(rebeca)\nFusible(rebeca)\nBantu(rebeca)\nforall x (Starchless(x) -> Tuberous(x))\nforall x (Bantu(x) -> Tuberous(x))\nforall x (Tuberous(x) -> Starchless(x))\n\nnot Bantu(rebeca)\n\ntherefore Bantu(rebeca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Lindsy is pursuing. Lindsy is weaponless. Prince is not apropos. Prince is viennese. Prince is apart. Prince is not restful. Iolanthe is not apropos. Iolanthe is restful. Acacia is pedagogic. Acacia is weaponless. Acacia is apart. Acacia is restful. If someone is weaponless then they are pedagogic. All restful people are pedagogic. If someone is pedagogic then they are weaponless. Iolanthe is pedagogic.", "logic": "\nPursuing(lindsy)\nWeaponless(lindsy)\nnot Apropos(prince)\nViennese(prince)\nApart(prince)\nnot Restful(prince)\nnot Apropos(iolanthe)\nRestful(iolanthe)\nPedagogic(acacia)\nWeaponless(acacia)\nApart(acacia)\nRestful(acacia)\nforall x (Weaponless(x) -> Pedagogic(x))\nforall x (Restful(x) -> Pedagogic(x))\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Weaponless(x))\n\nPedagogic(iolanthe)\n\nRestful(iolanthe) and forall x (Restful(x) -> Pedagogic(x)) -> therefore Pedagogic(iolanthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Robby is devilish. Robby is invaluable. Verene is not whiplike. Verene is baccate. Verene is servo. Verene is not mutable. Isabel is not whiplike. Isabel is mutable. Jefry is storied. Jefry is invaluable. Jefry is servo. Jefry is mutable. If someone is invaluable then they are storied. All mutable people are storied. If someone is storied then they are invaluable. Isabel is not storied.", "logic": "\nDevilish(robby)\nInvaluable(robby)\nnot Whiplike(verene)\nBaccate(verene)\nServo(verene)\nnot Mutable(verene)\nnot Whiplike(isabel)\nMutable(isabel)\nStoried(jefry)\nInvaluable(jefry)\nServo(jefry)\nMutable(jefry)\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Mutable(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Storied(x) -> Invaluable(x))\n\nnot Storied(isabel)\n\nMutable(isabel) and forall x (Mutable(x) -> Storied(x)) -> therefore Storied(isabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Alejandro is docile. Alejandro is obvious. Lauretta is not bland. Lauretta is riotous. Lauretta is sulky. Lauretta is not ascending. Rourke is not bland. Rourke is ascending. Sheela is carved. Sheela is obvious. Sheela is sulky. Sheela is ascending. If someone is obvious then they are carved. All ascending people are carved. If someone is carved then they are obvious. Rourke is obvious.", "logic": "\nDocile(alejandro)\nObvious(alejandro)\nnot Bland(lauretta)\nRiotous(lauretta)\nSulky(lauretta)\nnot Ascending(lauretta)\nnot Bland(rourke)\nAscending(rourke)\nCarved(sheela)\nObvious(sheela)\nSulky(sheela)\nAscending(sheela)\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Carved(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) -> Carved(x))\nforall x (Carved(x) -> Obvious(x))\n\nObvious(rourke)\n\nAscending(rourke) and forall x (Ascending(x) -> Carved(x)) -> therefore Carved(rourke) Carved(rourke) and forall x (Carved(x) -> Obvious(x)) -> therefore Obvious(rourke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Manda is recusant. Manda is caesural. Zia is not trifling. Zia is glistening. Zia is insane. Zia is not referenced. Valry is not trifling. Valry is referenced. Alyse is ironed. Alyse is caesural. Alyse is insane. Alyse is referenced. If someone is caesural then they are ironed. All referenced people are ironed. If someone is ironed then they are caesural. Valry is not caesural.", "logic": "\nRecusant(manda)\nCaesural(manda)\nnot Trifling(zia)\nGlistening(zia)\nInsane(zia)\nnot Referenced(zia)\nnot Trifling(valry)\nReferenced(valry)\nIroned(alyse)\nCaesural(alyse)\nInsane(alyse)\nReferenced(alyse)\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Ironed(x))\nforall x (Referenced(x) -> Ironed(x))\nforall x (Ironed(x) -> Caesural(x))\n\nnot Caesural(valry)\n\nReferenced(valry) and forall x (Referenced(x) -> Ironed(x)) -> therefore Ironed(valry) Ironed(valry) and forall x (Ironed(x) -> Caesural(x)) -> therefore Caesural(valry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Sturgis is unmilitary. Sturgis is evitable. Analiese is not loved. Analiese is mensurable. Analiese is amnestic. Analiese is not untangled. Paloma is not loved. Paloma is untangled. Maxie is unicuspid. Maxie is evitable. Maxie is amnestic. Maxie is untangled. If someone is evitable then they are unicuspid. All untangled people are unicuspid. If someone is unicuspid then they are evitable. Analiese is not evitable.", "logic": "\nUnmilitary(sturgis)\nEvitable(sturgis)\nnot Loved(analiese)\nMensurable(analiese)\nAmnestic(analiese)\nnot Untangled(analiese)\nnot Loved(paloma)\nUntangled(paloma)\nUnicuspid(maxie)\nEvitable(maxie)\nAmnestic(maxie)\nUntangled(maxie)\nforall x (Evitable(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Untangled(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Evitable(x))\n\nnot Evitable(analiese)\n\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Evitable(x)) <- forall x (Evitable(x) -> Unicuspid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "French is brindle. French is xxvi. Margo is not imaginable. Margo is princely. Margo is parental. Margo is not bruneian. Krista is not imaginable. Krista is bruneian. Corinne is alvine. Corinne is xxvi. Corinne is parental. Corinne is bruneian. If someone is xxvi then they are alvine. All bruneian people are alvine. If someone is alvine then they are xxvi. Margo is alvine.", "logic": "\nBrindle(french)\nXxvi(french)\nnot Imaginable(margo)\nPrincely(margo)\nParental(margo)\nnot Bruneian(margo)\nnot Imaginable(krista)\nBruneian(krista)\nAlvine(corinne)\nXxvi(corinne)\nParental(corinne)\nBruneian(corinne)\nforall x (Xxvi(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Bruneian(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Xxvi(x))\n\nAlvine(margo)\n\nforall x (Xxvi(x) -> Alvine(x)) <- forall x (Alvine(x) -> Xxvi(x)) <- forall x (Bruneian(x) -> Alvine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Jeralee is beetling. Jeralee is untamed. Matty is not aging. Matty is trim. Matty is deviate. Matty is not corrupting. Andie is not aging. Andie is corrupting. Ramsey is jinxed. Ramsey is untamed. Ramsey is deviate. Ramsey is corrupting. If someone is untamed then they are jinxed. All corrupting people are jinxed. If someone is jinxed then they are untamed. Ramsey is not aging.", "logic": "\nBeetling(jeralee)\nUntamed(jeralee)\nnot Aging(matty)\nTrim(matty)\nDeviate(matty)\nnot Corrupting(matty)\nnot Aging(andie)\nCorrupting(andie)\nJinxed(ramsey)\nUntamed(ramsey)\nDeviate(ramsey)\nCorrupting(ramsey)\nforall x (Untamed(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Corrupting(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Untamed(x))\n\nnot Aging(ramsey)\n\nnot Aging(ramsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Alyse is matey. Alyse is taliped. Maison is not bimestrial. Maison is reclaimed. Maison is salverform. Maison is not profligate. Reeta is not bimestrial. Reeta is profligate. Gardiner is erythroid. Gardiner is taliped. Gardiner is salverform. Gardiner is profligate. If someone is taliped then they are erythroid. All profligate people are erythroid. If someone is erythroid then they are taliped. Alyse is salverform.", "logic": "\nMatey(alyse)\nTaliped(alyse)\nnot Bimestrial(maison)\nReclaimed(maison)\nSalverform(maison)\nnot Profligate(maison)\nnot Bimestrial(reeta)\nProfligate(reeta)\nErythroid(gardiner)\nTaliped(gardiner)\nSalverform(gardiner)\nProfligate(gardiner)\nforall x (Taliped(x) -> Erythroid(x))\nforall x (Profligate(x) -> Erythroid(x))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) -> Taliped(x))\n\nSalverform(alyse)\n\nSalverform(alyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Gino is pinchbeck. Gino is inedible. Guillema is not natural. Guillema is beheaded. Guillema is pennate. Guillema is not drafty. Magdalene is not natural. Magdalene is drafty. Felita is murine. Felita is inedible. Felita is pennate. Felita is drafty. If someone is inedible then they are murine. All drafty people are murine. If someone is murine then they are inedible. Guillema is not pinchbeck.", "logic": "\nPinchbeck(gino)\nInedible(gino)\nnot Natural(guillema)\nBeheaded(guillema)\nPennate(guillema)\nnot Drafty(guillema)\nnot Natural(magdalene)\nDrafty(magdalene)\nMurine(felita)\nInedible(felita)\nPennate(felita)\nDrafty(felita)\nforall x (Inedible(x) -> Murine(x))\nforall x (Drafty(x) -> Murine(x))\nforall x (Murine(x) -> Inedible(x))\n\nnot Pinchbeck(guillema)\n\nnot Pinchbeck(guillema) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Milena is xenogeneic. Milena is petaloid. Camile is not ninetieth. Camile is gyral. Camile is papillose. Camile is not codified. Erek is not ninetieth. Erek is codified. Felisha is brocaded. Felisha is petaloid. Felisha is papillose. Felisha is codified. If someone is petaloid then they are brocaded. All codified people are brocaded. If someone is brocaded then they are petaloid. Felisha is xenogeneic.", "logic": "\nXenogeneic(milena)\nPetaloid(milena)\nnot Ninetieth(camile)\nGyral(camile)\nPapillose(camile)\nnot Codified(camile)\nnot Ninetieth(erek)\nCodified(erek)\nBrocaded(felisha)\nPetaloid(felisha)\nPapillose(felisha)\nCodified(felisha)\nforall x (Petaloid(x) -> Brocaded(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Brocaded(x))\nforall x (Brocaded(x) -> Petaloid(x))\n\nXenogeneic(felisha)\n\nXenogeneic(felisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-772"} {"premises": "Krystalle is unpainted. Krystalle is ephemeral. Krystalle is triclinic. Tresa is lifeless. Tresa is minimalist. Tresa is rotated. Tresa is ephemeral. Tresa is triclinic. Gere is lifeless. Gere is unpainted. Gere is ephemeral. Gere is triclinic. Smart things are lifeless. If something is lifeless and unpainted then it is rotated. Krystalle is unpainted.", "logic": "\nUnpainted(krystalle)\nEphemeral(krystalle)\nTriclinic(krystalle)\nLifeless(tresa)\nMinimalist(tresa)\nRotated(tresa)\nEphemeral(tresa)\nTriclinic(tresa)\nLifeless(gere)\nUnpainted(gere)\nEphemeral(gere)\nTriclinic(gere)\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) -> Lifeless(x))\nforall x (Lifeless(x) and Unpainted(x) -> Rotated(x))\n\nUnpainted(krystalle)\n\ntherefore Unpainted(krystalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Amalita is forehanded. Amalita is totemic. Amalita is vivid. Partha is high. Partha is creamy. Partha is airy. Partha is totemic. Partha is vivid. Voltaire is high. Voltaire is forehanded. Voltaire is totemic. Voltaire is vivid. Smart things are high. If something is high and forehanded then it is airy. Amalita is not forehanded.", "logic": "\nForehanded(amalita)\nTotemic(amalita)\nVivid(amalita)\nHigh(partha)\nCreamy(partha)\nAiry(partha)\nTotemic(partha)\nVivid(partha)\nHigh(voltaire)\nForehanded(voltaire)\nTotemic(voltaire)\nVivid(voltaire)\nforall x (Totemic(x) -> High(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Forehanded(x) -> Airy(x))\n\nnot Forehanded(amalita)\n\ntherefore Forehanded(amalita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Danika is scented. Danika is monopteral. Danika is awkward. Christian is sapphic. Christian is augean. Christian is phonetic. Christian is monopteral. Christian is awkward. Laurie is sapphic. Laurie is scented. Laurie is monopteral. Laurie is awkward. Smart things are sapphic. If something is sapphic and scented then it is phonetic. Danika is sapphic.", "logic": "\nScented(danika)\nMonopteral(danika)\nAwkward(danika)\nSapphic(christian)\nAugean(christian)\nPhonetic(christian)\nMonopteral(christian)\nAwkward(christian)\nSapphic(laurie)\nScented(laurie)\nMonopteral(laurie)\nAwkward(laurie)\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> Sapphic(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Scented(x) -> Phonetic(x))\n\nSapphic(danika)\n\nMonopteral(danika) and forall x (Monopteral(x) -> Sapphic(x)) -> therefore Sapphic(danika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Carmina is excrescent. Carmina is imperfect. Carmina is waxlike. Netty is glottal. Netty is mexican. Netty is ancient. Netty is imperfect. Netty is waxlike. Krystyna is glottal. Krystyna is excrescent. Krystyna is imperfect. Krystyna is waxlike. Smart things are glottal. If something is glottal and excrescent then it is ancient. Carmina is not glottal.", "logic": "\nExcrescent(carmina)\nImperfect(carmina)\nWaxlike(carmina)\nGlottal(netty)\nMexican(netty)\nAncient(netty)\nImperfect(netty)\nWaxlike(netty)\nGlottal(krystyna)\nExcrescent(krystyna)\nImperfect(krystyna)\nWaxlike(krystyna)\nforall x (Imperfect(x) -> Glottal(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) and Excrescent(x) -> Ancient(x))\n\nnot Glottal(carmina)\n\nImperfect(carmina) and forall x (Imperfect(x) -> Glottal(x)) -> therefore Glottal(carmina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Quigly is decorative. Quigly is ghoulish. Quigly is cubist. Kristien is olive. Kristien is awakened. Kristien is fivefold. Kristien is ghoulish. Kristien is cubist. Ginnifer is olive. Ginnifer is decorative. Ginnifer is ghoulish. Ginnifer is cubist. Smart things are olive. If something is olive and decorative then it is fivefold. Quigly is fivefold.", "logic": "\nDecorative(quigly)\nGhoulish(quigly)\nCubist(quigly)\nOlive(kristien)\nAwakened(kristien)\nFivefold(kristien)\nGhoulish(kristien)\nCubist(kristien)\nOlive(ginnifer)\nDecorative(ginnifer)\nGhoulish(ginnifer)\nCubist(ginnifer)\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Olive(x))\nforall x (Olive(x) and Decorative(x) -> Fivefold(x))\n\nFivefold(quigly)\n\nGhoulish(quigly) and forall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Olive(x)) -> therefore Olive(quigly) Olive(quigly) and Decorative(quigly) and forall x (Olive(x) and Decorative(x) -> Fivefold(x)) -> therefore Fivefold(quigly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Sherline is scrivened. Sherline is featured. Sherline is egocentric. Beulah is unclean. Beulah is swazi. Beulah is carmelite. Beulah is featured. Beulah is egocentric. Merl is unclean. Merl is scrivened. Merl is featured. Merl is egocentric. Smart things are unclean. If something is unclean and scrivened then it is carmelite. Sherline is not carmelite.", "logic": "\nScrivened(sherline)\nFeatured(sherline)\nEgocentric(sherline)\nUnclean(beulah)\nSwazi(beulah)\nCarmelite(beulah)\nFeatured(beulah)\nEgocentric(beulah)\nUnclean(merl)\nScrivened(merl)\nFeatured(merl)\nEgocentric(merl)\nforall x (Featured(x) -> Unclean(x))\nforall x (Unclean(x) and Scrivened(x) -> Carmelite(x))\n\nnot Carmelite(sherline)\n\nFeatured(sherline) and forall x (Featured(x) -> Unclean(x)) -> therefore Unclean(sherline) Unclean(sherline) and Scrivened(sherline) and forall x (Unclean(x) and Scrivened(x) -> Carmelite(x)) -> therefore Carmelite(sherline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Leora is extralegal. Leora is misbegot. Leora is scarce. Vite is sloshed. Vite is unmingled. Vite is tall. Vite is misbegot. Vite is scarce. Alaa is sloshed. Alaa is extralegal. Alaa is misbegot. Alaa is scarce. Smart things are sloshed. If something is sloshed and extralegal then it is tall. Leora is not red.", "logic": "\nExtralegal(leora)\nMisbegot(leora)\nScarce(leora)\nSloshed(vite)\nUnmingled(vite)\nTall(vite)\nMisbegot(vite)\nScarce(vite)\nSloshed(alaa)\nExtralegal(alaa)\nMisbegot(alaa)\nScarce(alaa)\nforall x (Misbegot(x) -> Sloshed(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) and Extralegal(x) -> Tall(x))\n\nnot Red(leora)\n\nnot Red(leora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Deloris is uniform. Deloris is omissive. Deloris is tonguelike. Trevar is cabalistic. Trevar is trussed. Trevar is triune. Trevar is omissive. Trevar is tonguelike. Laurance is cabalistic. Laurance is uniform. Laurance is omissive. Laurance is tonguelike. Smart things are cabalistic. If something is cabalistic and uniform then it is triune. Trevar is uniform.", "logic": "\nUniform(deloris)\nOmissive(deloris)\nTonguelike(deloris)\nCabalistic(trevar)\nTrussed(trevar)\nTriune(trevar)\nOmissive(trevar)\nTonguelike(trevar)\nCabalistic(laurance)\nUniform(laurance)\nOmissive(laurance)\nTonguelike(laurance)\nforall x (Omissive(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) and Uniform(x) -> Triune(x))\n\nUniform(trevar)\n\nUniform(trevar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Bennett is hempen. Bennett is mourning. Bennett is colonised. Yuri is bitter. Yuri is assuasive. Yuri is adscripted. Yuri is mourning. Yuri is colonised. Kassia is bitter. Kassia is hempen. Kassia is mourning. Kassia is colonised. Smart things are bitter. If something is bitter and hempen then it is adscripted. Yuri is not red.", "logic": "\nHempen(bennett)\nMourning(bennett)\nColonised(bennett)\nBitter(yuri)\nAssuasive(yuri)\nAdscripted(yuri)\nMourning(yuri)\nColonised(yuri)\nBitter(kassia)\nHempen(kassia)\nMourning(kassia)\nColonised(kassia)\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) and Hempen(x) -> Adscripted(x))\n\nnot Red(yuri)\n\nnot Red(yuri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Maurine is carved. Maurine is shining. Maurine is cyanogenic. Celene is blocky. Celene is spermatic. Celene is reverent. Celene is shining. Celene is cyanogenic. Alden is blocky. Alden is carved. Alden is shining. Alden is cyanogenic. Smart things are blocky. If something is blocky and carved then it is reverent. Alden is red.", "logic": "\nCarved(maurine)\nShining(maurine)\nCyanogenic(maurine)\nBlocky(celene)\nSpermatic(celene)\nReverent(celene)\nShining(celene)\nCyanogenic(celene)\nBlocky(alden)\nCarved(alden)\nShining(alden)\nCyanogenic(alden)\nforall x (Shining(x) -> Blocky(x))\nforall x (Blocky(x) and Carved(x) -> Reverent(x))\n\nRed(alden)\n\nRed(alden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Carlin is ionised. Carlin is anatropous. Carlin is uplifted. Fionna is carinal. Fionna is uncaulked. Fionna is perturbing. Fionna is anatropous. Fionna is uplifted. Caesar is carinal. Caesar is ionised. Caesar is anatropous. Caesar is uplifted. Smart things are carinal. If something is carinal and ionised then it is perturbing. Caesar is not uncaulked.", "logic": "\nIonised(carlin)\nAnatropous(carlin)\nUplifted(carlin)\nCarinal(fionna)\nUncaulked(fionna)\nPerturbing(fionna)\nAnatropous(fionna)\nUplifted(fionna)\nCarinal(caesar)\nIonised(caesar)\nAnatropous(caesar)\nUplifted(caesar)\nforall x (Anatropous(x) -> Carinal(x))\nforall x (Carinal(x) and Ionised(x) -> Perturbing(x))\n\nnot Uncaulked(caesar)\n\nnot Uncaulked(caesar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Vaclav is snorty. Vaclav is bubbly. Vaclav is baronial. Westley is ignorant. Westley is excusable. Westley is scraggy. Westley is bubbly. Westley is baronial. Rickard is ignorant. Rickard is snorty. Rickard is bubbly. Rickard is baronial. Smart things are ignorant. If something is ignorant and snorty then it is scraggy. Vaclav is excusable.", "logic": "\nSnorty(vaclav)\nBubbly(vaclav)\nBaronial(vaclav)\nIgnorant(westley)\nExcusable(westley)\nScraggy(westley)\nBubbly(westley)\nBaronial(westley)\nIgnorant(rickard)\nSnorty(rickard)\nBubbly(rickard)\nBaronial(rickard)\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Ignorant(x))\nforall x (Ignorant(x) and Snorty(x) -> Scraggy(x))\n\nExcusable(vaclav)\n\nExcusable(vaclav) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1549"} {"premises": "Angelika is disfigured. Estel is tympanitic. Blondell is affirmable. Kameko is antifungal. If Blondell is affirmable then Blondell is disfigured. Quiet people are tympanitic. Estel is tympanitic.", "logic": "\nDisfigured(angelika)\nTympanitic(estel)\nAffirmable(blondell)\nAntifungal(kameko)\nAffirmable(blondell) -> Disfigured(blondell)\nforall x (Disfigured(x) -> Tympanitic(x))\n\nTympanitic(estel)\n\ntherefore Tympanitic(estel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Rosamond is toupeed. Gunner is ironclad. Adina is pivotal. Gisela is cytolytic. If Adina is pivotal then Adina is toupeed. Quiet people are ironclad. Rosamond is not toupeed.", "logic": "\nToupeed(rosamond)\nIronclad(gunner)\nPivotal(adina)\nCytolytic(gisela)\nPivotal(adina) -> Toupeed(adina)\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Ironclad(x))\n\nnot Toupeed(rosamond)\n\ntherefore Toupeed(rosamond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Fanechka is melancholy. Eli is horrified. Harvey is metalloid. Rustie is falciform. If Harvey is metalloid then Harvey is melancholy. Quiet people are horrified. Harvey is melancholy.", "logic": "\nMelancholy(fanechka)\nHorrified(eli)\nMetalloid(harvey)\nFalciform(rustie)\nMetalloid(harvey) -> Melancholy(harvey)\nforall x (Melancholy(x) -> Horrified(x))\n\nMelancholy(harvey)\n\nMetalloid(harvey) and Metalloid(harvey) -> Melancholy(harvey) -> therefore Melancholy(harvey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Brewster is receptive. Jill is alienable. Reggi is taiwanese. Trudy is slovakian. If Reggi is taiwanese then Reggi is receptive. Quiet people are alienable. Brewster is not alienable.", "logic": "\nReceptive(brewster)\nAlienable(jill)\nTaiwanese(reggi)\nSlovakian(trudy)\nTaiwanese(reggi) -> Receptive(reggi)\nforall x (Receptive(x) -> Alienable(x))\n\nnot Alienable(brewster)\n\nReceptive(brewster) and forall x (Receptive(x) -> Alienable(x)) -> therefore Alienable(brewster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Hale is overlarge. Valry is umbilicate. Prunella is balconied. Joleen is yellowish. If Prunella is balconied then Prunella is overlarge. Quiet people are umbilicate. Prunella is umbilicate.", "logic": "\nOverlarge(hale)\nUmbilicate(valry)\nBalconied(prunella)\nYellowish(joleen)\nBalconied(prunella) -> Overlarge(prunella)\nforall x (Overlarge(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\n\nUmbilicate(prunella)\n\nBalconied(prunella) and Balconied(prunella) -> Overlarge(prunella) -> therefore Overlarge(prunella) Overlarge(prunella) and forall x (Overlarge(x) -> Umbilicate(x)) -> therefore Umbilicate(prunella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Auria is entozoic. Darin is alkaloidal. Sigfrid is improved. Denis is inflamed. If Sigfrid is improved then Sigfrid is entozoic. Quiet people are alkaloidal. Sigfrid is not alkaloidal.", "logic": "\nEntozoic(auria)\nAlkaloidal(darin)\nImproved(sigfrid)\nInflamed(denis)\nImproved(sigfrid) -> Entozoic(sigfrid)\nforall x (Entozoic(x) -> Alkaloidal(x))\n\nnot Alkaloidal(sigfrid)\n\nImproved(sigfrid) and Improved(sigfrid) -> Entozoic(sigfrid) -> therefore Entozoic(sigfrid) Entozoic(sigfrid) and forall x (Entozoic(x) -> Alkaloidal(x)) -> therefore Alkaloidal(sigfrid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Iormina is unicuspid. Kimball is under. Ludwig is lustful. Danita is canorous. If Ludwig is lustful then Ludwig is unicuspid. Quiet people are under. Danita is not under.", "logic": "\nUnicuspid(iormina)\nUnder(kimball)\nLustful(ludwig)\nCanorous(danita)\nLustful(ludwig) -> Unicuspid(ludwig)\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Under(x))\n\nnot Under(danita)\n\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Under(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Wilone is corporal. Laurent is anxious. Pearl is credible. Ichabod is real. If Pearl is credible then Pearl is corporal. Quiet people are anxious. Wilone is real.", "logic": "\nCorporal(wilone)\nAnxious(laurent)\nCredible(pearl)\nReal(ichabod)\nCredible(pearl) -> Corporal(pearl)\nforall x (Corporal(x) -> Anxious(x))\n\nReal(wilone)\n\nReal(wilone) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Alleen is wriggling. Giordano is deciduous. Raphael is ultrasonic. Steve is ambulatory. If Raphael is ultrasonic then Raphael is wriggling. Quiet people are deciduous. Giordano is not green.", "logic": "\nWriggling(alleen)\nDeciduous(giordano)\nUltrasonic(raphael)\nAmbulatory(steve)\nUltrasonic(raphael) -> Wriggling(raphael)\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Deciduous(x))\n\nnot Green(giordano)\n\nnot Green(giordano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Belita is umbrella. Augustus is cobwebby. Salli is concluded. Suzann is chromatic. If Salli is concluded then Salli is umbrella. Quiet people are cobwebby. Belita is cold.", "logic": "\nUmbrella(belita)\nCobwebby(augustus)\nConcluded(salli)\nChromatic(suzann)\nConcluded(salli) -> Umbrella(salli)\nforall x (Umbrella(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\n\nCold(belita)\n\nCold(belita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Fania is aching. Heidie is ossified. Magdalena is peripheral. Jotham is offside. If Magdalena is peripheral then Magdalena is aching. Quiet people are ossified. Heidie is not peripheral.", "logic": "\nAching(fania)\nOssified(heidie)\nPeripheral(magdalena)\nOffside(jotham)\nPeripheral(magdalena) -> Aching(magdalena)\nforall x (Aching(x) -> Ossified(x))\n\nnot Peripheral(heidie)\n\nnot Peripheral(heidie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Alden is punk. Haley is tympanic. Sonni is fiduciary. Leda is uneven. If Sonni is fiduciary then Sonni is punk. Quiet people are tympanic. Alden is blue.", "logic": "\nPunk(alden)\nTympanic(haley)\nFiduciary(sonni)\nUneven(leda)\nFiduciary(sonni) -> Punk(sonni)\nforall x (Punk(x) -> Tympanic(x))\n\nBlue(alden)\n\nBlue(alden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "Aleen is archetypal. Aleen is myopathic. Aleen is burundian. Aleen is sedulous. Israel is archetypal. Israel is untidy. Israel is burundian. Israel is marooned. Chrystal is untidy. Chrystal is burundian. Lyndy is marooned. Lyndy is sedulous. All myopathic, untidy people are archetypal. If someone is archetypal and burundian then they are myopathic. Quiet people are archetypal. Aleen is burundian.", "logic": "\nArchetypal(aleen)\nMyopathic(aleen)\nBurundian(aleen)\nSedulous(aleen)\nArchetypal(israel)\nUntidy(israel)\nBurundian(israel)\nMarooned(israel)\nUntidy(chrystal)\nBurundian(chrystal)\nMarooned(lyndy)\nSedulous(lyndy)\nforall x (Myopathic(x) and Untidy(x) -> Archetypal(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and Burundian(x) -> Myopathic(x))\nforall x (Untidy(x) -> Archetypal(x))\n\nBurundian(aleen)\n\ntherefore Burundian(aleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Avraham is mirrorlike. Avraham is xlvii. Avraham is hindmost. Avraham is automated. Patric is mirrorlike. Patric is unarmored. Patric is hindmost. Patric is steepish. Olympia is unarmored. Olympia is hindmost. Hasty is steepish. Hasty is automated. All xlvii, unarmored people are mirrorlike. If someone is mirrorlike and hindmost then they are xlvii. Quiet people are mirrorlike. Hasty is not automated.", "logic": "\nMirrorlike(avraham)\nXlvii(avraham)\nHindmost(avraham)\nAutomated(avraham)\nMirrorlike(patric)\nUnarmored(patric)\nHindmost(patric)\nSteepish(patric)\nUnarmored(olympia)\nHindmost(olympia)\nSteepish(hasty)\nAutomated(hasty)\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and Unarmored(x) -> Mirrorlike(x))\nforall x (Mirrorlike(x) and Hindmost(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Unarmored(x) -> Mirrorlike(x))\n\nnot Automated(hasty)\n\ntherefore Automated(hasty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Jane is lipotropic. Jane is choosey. Jane is jamaican. Jane is unreadable. Delbert is lipotropic. Delbert is iodised. Delbert is jamaican. Delbert is deflated. Olenka is iodised. Olenka is jamaican. Ilsa is deflated. Ilsa is unreadable. All choosey, iodised people are lipotropic. If someone is lipotropic and jamaican then they are choosey. Quiet people are lipotropic. Olenka is lipotropic.", "logic": "\nLipotropic(jane)\nChoosey(jane)\nJamaican(jane)\nUnreadable(jane)\nLipotropic(delbert)\nIodised(delbert)\nJamaican(delbert)\nDeflated(delbert)\nIodised(olenka)\nJamaican(olenka)\nDeflated(ilsa)\nUnreadable(ilsa)\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Iodised(x) -> Lipotropic(x))\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) and Jamaican(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Iodised(x) -> Lipotropic(x))\n\nLipotropic(olenka)\n\nIodised(olenka) and forall x (Iodised(x) -> Lipotropic(x)) -> therefore Lipotropic(olenka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Mitchel is unmanlike. Mitchel is zoological. Mitchel is defective. Mitchel is superfine. Rosalia is unmanlike. Rosalia is registered. Rosalia is defective. Rosalia is dateable. Temple is registered. Temple is defective. Josselyn is dateable. Josselyn is superfine. All zoological, registered people are unmanlike. If someone is unmanlike and defective then they are zoological. Quiet people are unmanlike. Temple is not unmanlike.", "logic": "\nUnmanlike(mitchel)\nZoological(mitchel)\nDefective(mitchel)\nSuperfine(mitchel)\nUnmanlike(rosalia)\nRegistered(rosalia)\nDefective(rosalia)\nDateable(rosalia)\nRegistered(temple)\nDefective(temple)\nDateable(josselyn)\nSuperfine(josselyn)\nforall x (Zoological(x) and Registered(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) and Defective(x) -> Zoological(x))\nforall x (Registered(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\n\nnot Unmanlike(temple)\n\nRegistered(temple) and forall x (Registered(x) -> Unmanlike(x)) -> therefore Unmanlike(temple)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Samson is angulate. Samson is aerophilic. Samson is farcical. Samson is windburned. Garwood is angulate. Garwood is unplanted. Garwood is farcical. Garwood is federate. Carter is unplanted. Carter is farcical. Jorey is federate. Jorey is windburned. All aerophilic, unplanted people are angulate. If someone is angulate and farcical then they are aerophilic. Quiet people are angulate. Carter is aerophilic.", "logic": "\nAngulate(samson)\nAerophilic(samson)\nFarcical(samson)\nWindburned(samson)\nAngulate(garwood)\nUnplanted(garwood)\nFarcical(garwood)\nFederate(garwood)\nUnplanted(carter)\nFarcical(carter)\nFederate(jorey)\nWindburned(jorey)\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) and Unplanted(x) -> Angulate(x))\nforall x (Angulate(x) and Farcical(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> Angulate(x))\n\nAerophilic(carter)\n\nUnplanted(carter) and forall x (Unplanted(x) -> Angulate(x)) -> therefore Angulate(carter) Angulate(carter) and Farcical(carter) and forall x (Angulate(x) and Farcical(x) -> Aerophilic(x)) -> therefore Aerophilic(carter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Harmon is labelled. Harmon is bedimmed. Harmon is bladdery. Harmon is nullified. Verna is labelled. Verna is honeylike. Verna is bladdery. Verna is bromic. Davide is honeylike. Davide is bladdery. Enrica is bromic. Enrica is nullified. All bedimmed, honeylike people are labelled. If someone is labelled and bladdery then they are bedimmed. Quiet people are labelled. Davide is not bedimmed.", "logic": "\nLabelled(harmon)\nBedimmed(harmon)\nBladdery(harmon)\nNullified(harmon)\nLabelled(verna)\nHoneylike(verna)\nBladdery(verna)\nBromic(verna)\nHoneylike(davide)\nBladdery(davide)\nBromic(enrica)\nNullified(enrica)\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) and Honeylike(x) -> Labelled(x))\nforall x (Labelled(x) and Bladdery(x) -> Bedimmed(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> Labelled(x))\n\nnot Bedimmed(davide)\n\nHoneylike(davide) and forall x (Honeylike(x) -> Labelled(x)) -> therefore Labelled(davide) Labelled(davide) and Bladdery(davide) and forall x (Labelled(x) and Bladdery(x) -> Bedimmed(x)) -> therefore Bedimmed(davide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Katheleen is axenic. Katheleen is blind. Katheleen is weedless. Katheleen is popish. Annabel is axenic. Annabel is lxxxv. Annabel is weedless. Annabel is heliac. Elizabet is lxxxv. Elizabet is weedless. Milton is heliac. Milton is popish. All blind, lxxxv people are axenic. If someone is axenic and weedless then they are blind. Quiet people are axenic. Milton is not blind.", "logic": "\nAxenic(katheleen)\nBlind(katheleen)\nWeedless(katheleen)\nPopish(katheleen)\nAxenic(annabel)\nLxxxv(annabel)\nWeedless(annabel)\nHeliac(annabel)\nLxxxv(elizabet)\nWeedless(elizabet)\nHeliac(milton)\nPopish(milton)\nforall x (Blind(x) and Lxxxv(x) -> Axenic(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) and Weedless(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Lxxxv(x) -> Axenic(x))\n\nnot Blind(milton)\n\nforall x (Axenic(x) and Weedless(x) -> Blind(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Shelden is soviet. Shelden is capillary. Shelden is suppliant. Shelden is linnaean. Secunda is soviet. Secunda is newfangled. Secunda is suppliant. Secunda is decorous. Tomas is newfangled. Tomas is suppliant. Corabel is decorous. Corabel is linnaean. All capillary, newfangled people are soviet. If someone is soviet and suppliant then they are capillary. Quiet people are soviet. Corabel is soviet.", "logic": "\nSoviet(shelden)\nCapillary(shelden)\nSuppliant(shelden)\nLinnaean(shelden)\nSoviet(secunda)\nNewfangled(secunda)\nSuppliant(secunda)\nDecorous(secunda)\nNewfangled(tomas)\nSuppliant(tomas)\nDecorous(corabel)\nLinnaean(corabel)\nforall x (Capillary(x) and Newfangled(x) -> Soviet(x))\nforall x (Soviet(x) and Suppliant(x) -> Capillary(x))\nforall x (Newfangled(x) -> Soviet(x))\n\nSoviet(corabel)\n\nforall x (Capillary(x) and Newfangled(x) -> Soviet(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Magdalen is unsexed. Magdalen is shamanist. Magdalen is midland. Magdalen is dyslectic. Winifred is unsexed. Winifred is unsized. Winifred is midland. Winifred is alluring. Winton is unsized. Winton is midland. Minetta is alluring. Minetta is dyslectic. All shamanist, unsized people are unsexed. If someone is unsexed and midland then they are shamanist. Quiet people are unsexed. Magdalen is not unsized.", "logic": "\nUnsexed(magdalen)\nShamanist(magdalen)\nMidland(magdalen)\nDyslectic(magdalen)\nUnsexed(winifred)\nUnsized(winifred)\nMidland(winifred)\nAlluring(winifred)\nUnsized(winton)\nMidland(winton)\nAlluring(minetta)\nDyslectic(minetta)\nforall x (Shamanist(x) and Unsized(x) -> Unsexed(x))\nforall x (Unsexed(x) and Midland(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Unsized(x) -> Unsexed(x))\n\nnot Unsized(magdalen)\n\nnot Unsized(magdalen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Rochette is unabused. Rochette is mauve. Rochette is cushioned. Rochette is pouched. Melisent is unabused. Melisent is unloved. Melisent is cushioned. Melisent is versatile. Angelico is unloved. Angelico is cushioned. Karilynn is versatile. Karilynn is pouched. All mauve, unloved people are unabused. If someone is unabused and cushioned then they are mauve. Quiet people are unabused. Melisent is green.", "logic": "\nUnabused(rochette)\nMauve(rochette)\nCushioned(rochette)\nPouched(rochette)\nUnabused(melisent)\nUnloved(melisent)\nCushioned(melisent)\nVersatile(melisent)\nUnloved(angelico)\nCushioned(angelico)\nVersatile(karilynn)\nPouched(karilynn)\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Unloved(x) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and Cushioned(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Unloved(x) -> Unabused(x))\n\nGreen(melisent)\n\nGreen(melisent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Sivert is vinegary. Sivert is incautious. Sivert is hurrying. Sivert is smelly. Elwira is vinegary. Elwira is nonliving. Elwira is hurrying. Elwira is bifilar. Lola is nonliving. Lola is hurrying. Dominick is bifilar. Dominick is smelly. All incautious, nonliving people are vinegary. If someone is vinegary and hurrying then they are incautious. Quiet people are vinegary. Dominick is not hurrying.", "logic": "\nVinegary(sivert)\nIncautious(sivert)\nHurrying(sivert)\nSmelly(sivert)\nVinegary(elwira)\nNonliving(elwira)\nHurrying(elwira)\nBifilar(elwira)\nNonliving(lola)\nHurrying(lola)\nBifilar(dominick)\nSmelly(dominick)\nforall x (Incautious(x) and Nonliving(x) -> Vinegary(x))\nforall x (Vinegary(x) and Hurrying(x) -> Incautious(x))\nforall x (Nonliving(x) -> Vinegary(x))\n\nnot Hurrying(dominick)\n\nnot Hurrying(dominick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Lorna is teensy. Lorna is blamed. Lorna is saline. Lorna is shaved. Lizette is teensy. Lizette is necked. Lizette is saline. Lizette is parochial. Kassie is necked. Kassie is saline. Natassia is parochial. Natassia is shaved. All blamed, necked people are teensy. If someone is teensy and saline then they are blamed. Quiet people are teensy. Natassia is green.", "logic": "\nTeensy(lorna)\nBlamed(lorna)\nSaline(lorna)\nShaved(lorna)\nTeensy(lizette)\nNecked(lizette)\nSaline(lizette)\nParochial(lizette)\nNecked(kassie)\nSaline(kassie)\nParochial(natassia)\nShaved(natassia)\nforall x (Blamed(x) and Necked(x) -> Teensy(x))\nforall x (Teensy(x) and Saline(x) -> Blamed(x))\nforall x (Necked(x) -> Teensy(x))\n\nGreen(natassia)\n\nGreen(natassia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-233"} {"premises": "Carlee is xeric. Carlee is twopenny. Carlee is velvety. Carlee is biconvex. Carlee is saline. Trevor is gregarious. Trevor is xeric. Trevor is twopenny. Trevor is velvety. Trevor is saline. Cold, methodical things are gregarious. If something is saline then it is methodical. Trevor is velvety.", "logic": "\nXeric(carlee)\nTwopenny(carlee)\nVelvety(carlee)\nBiconvex(carlee)\nSaline(carlee)\nGregarious(trevor)\nXeric(trevor)\nTwopenny(trevor)\nVelvety(trevor)\nSaline(trevor)\nforall x (Xeric(x) and Methodical(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Saline(x) -> Methodical(x))\n\nVelvety(trevor)\n\ntherefore Velvety(trevor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "Ritch is footless. Ritch is turkish. Ritch is raring. Ritch is harmless. Ritch is hmong. Win is writhing. Win is footless. Win is turkish. Win is raring. Win is hmong. Cold, statutory things are writhing. If something is hmong then it is statutory. Win is not hmong.", "logic": "\nFootless(ritch)\nTurkish(ritch)\nRaring(ritch)\nHarmless(ritch)\nHmong(ritch)\nWrithing(win)\nFootless(win)\nTurkish(win)\nRaring(win)\nHmong(win)\nforall x (Footless(x) and Statutory(x) -> Writhing(x))\nforall x (Hmong(x) -> Statutory(x))\n\nnot Hmong(win)\n\ntherefore Hmong(win)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "Elyssa is roseate. Elyssa is mown. Elyssa is windy. Elyssa is jade. Elyssa is gainful. Enya is unblessed. Enya is roseate. Enya is mown. Enya is windy. Enya is gainful. Cold, undefeated things are unblessed. If something is gainful then it is undefeated. Elyssa is undefeated.", "logic": "\nRoseate(elyssa)\nMown(elyssa)\nWindy(elyssa)\nJade(elyssa)\nGainful(elyssa)\nUnblessed(enya)\nRoseate(enya)\nMown(enya)\nWindy(enya)\nGainful(enya)\nforall x (Roseate(x) and Undefeated(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Gainful(x) -> Undefeated(x))\n\nUndefeated(elyssa)\n\nGainful(elyssa) and forall x (Gainful(x) -> Undefeated(x)) -> therefore Undefeated(elyssa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "Joella is burly. Joella is lobate. Joella is anguillan. Joella is agone. Joella is plane. Daisey is undefined. Daisey is burly. Daisey is lobate. Daisey is anguillan. Daisey is plane. Cold, wounded things are undefined. If something is plane then it is wounded. Joella is not wounded.", "logic": "\nBurly(joella)\nLobate(joella)\nAnguillan(joella)\nAgone(joella)\nPlane(joella)\nUndefined(daisey)\nBurly(daisey)\nLobate(daisey)\nAnguillan(daisey)\nPlane(daisey)\nforall x (Burly(x) and Wounded(x) -> Undefined(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) -> Wounded(x))\n\nnot Wounded(joella)\n\nPlane(joella) and forall x (Plane(x) -> Wounded(x)) -> therefore Wounded(joella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "Sharity is fawning. Sharity is rattling. Sharity is craved. Sharity is sick. Sharity is untempting. Guillermo is windward. Guillermo is fawning. Guillermo is rattling. Guillermo is craved. Guillermo is untempting. Cold, quaint things are windward. If something is untempting then it is quaint. Sharity is windward.", "logic": "\nFawning(sharity)\nRattling(sharity)\nCraved(sharity)\nSick(sharity)\nUntempting(sharity)\nWindward(guillermo)\nFawning(guillermo)\nRattling(guillermo)\nCraved(guillermo)\nUntempting(guillermo)\nforall x (Fawning(x) and Quaint(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> Quaint(x))\n\nWindward(sharity)\n\nUntempting(sharity) and forall x (Untempting(x) -> Quaint(x)) -> therefore Quaint(sharity) Fawning(sharity) and Quaint(sharity) and forall x (Fawning(x) and Quaint(x) -> Windward(x)) -> therefore Windward(sharity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "Beth is changing. Beth is miasmal. Beth is frore. Beth is stumpy. Beth is outmoded. Biddy is biased. Biddy is changing. Biddy is miasmal. Biddy is frore. Biddy is outmoded. Cold, sotho things are biased. If something is outmoded then it is sotho. Beth is not biased.", "logic": "\nChanging(beth)\nMiasmal(beth)\nFrore(beth)\nStumpy(beth)\nOutmoded(beth)\nBiased(biddy)\nChanging(biddy)\nMiasmal(biddy)\nFrore(biddy)\nOutmoded(biddy)\nforall x (Changing(x) and Sotho(x) -> Biased(x))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) -> Sotho(x))\n\nnot Biased(beth)\n\nOutmoded(beth) and forall x (Outmoded(x) -> Sotho(x)) -> therefore Sotho(beth) Changing(beth) and Sotho(beth) and forall x (Changing(x) and Sotho(x) -> Biased(x)) -> therefore Biased(beth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The betteann is rheumatic. The betteann is not juridical. The betteann is not philatelic. The betteann does not like the siana. The siana is moronic. The siana is not juridical. The josi nock the betteann. The hasty coffin the siana. The hasty coffin the josi. The hasty is ethnic. If something coffin the hasty and it is ethnic then the hasty does not like the josi. If something perch the betteann then the betteann is not ethnic. If the hasty nock the betteann and the betteann nock the siana then the betteann does not chase the hasty. If something is rheumatic then it is not ethnic. If the hasty nock the josi and the josi does not need the siana then the siana does not like the betteann. If something coffin the siana then the siana is rheumatic. The josi nock the betteann.", "logic": "\nRheumatic(betteann)\nnot Juridical(betteann)\nnot Philatelic(betteann)\nnot Perch(betteann, siana)\nMoronic(siana)\nnot Juridical(siana)\nNock(josi, betteann)\nCoffin(hasty, siana)\nCoffin(hasty, josi)\nEthnic(hasty)\nforall x (Coffin(x, hasty) and Ethnic(x) -> not Perch(hasty, josi))\nforall x (Perch(x, betteann) -> not Ethnic(betteann))\nNock(hasty, betteann) and Nock(betteann, siana) -> not Coffin(betteann, hasty)\nforall x (Rheumatic(x) -> not Ethnic(x))\nNock(hasty, josi) and not Nock(josi, siana) -> not Perch(siana, betteann)\nforall x (Coffin(x, siana) -> Rheumatic(siana))\n\nNock(josi, betteann)\n\ntherefore Nock(josi, betteann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The myrtle is necklike. The myrtle is not stingy. The myrtle is not rheumatoid. The myrtle does not like the parker. The parker is gassy. The parker is not stingy. The hasheem obscure the myrtle. The annalyse visit the parker. The annalyse visit the hasheem. The annalyse is overland. If something visit the annalyse and it is overland then the annalyse does not like the hasheem. If something transcend the myrtle then the myrtle is not overland. If the annalyse obscure the myrtle and the myrtle obscure the parker then the myrtle does not chase the annalyse. If something is necklike then it is not overland. If the annalyse obscure the hasheem and the hasheem does not need the parker then the parker does not like the myrtle. If something visit the parker then the parker is necklike. The annalyse does not chase the hasheem.", "logic": "\nNecklike(myrtle)\nnot Stingy(myrtle)\nnot Rheumatoid(myrtle)\nnot Transcend(myrtle, parker)\nGassy(parker)\nnot Stingy(parker)\nObscure(hasheem, myrtle)\nVisit(annalyse, parker)\nVisit(annalyse, hasheem)\nOverland(annalyse)\nforall x (Visit(x, annalyse) and Overland(x) -> not Transcend(annalyse, hasheem))\nforall x (Transcend(x, myrtle) -> not Overland(myrtle))\nObscure(annalyse, myrtle) and Obscure(myrtle, parker) -> not Visit(myrtle, annalyse)\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> not Overland(x))\nObscure(annalyse, hasheem) and not Obscure(hasheem, parker) -> not Transcend(parker, myrtle)\nforall x (Visit(x, parker) -> Necklike(parker))\n\nnot Visit(annalyse, hasheem)\n\ntherefore Visit(annalyse, hasheem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The ivor is tidy. The ivor is not bridgeable. The ivor is not aryan. The ivor does not like the sher. The sher is senior. The sher is not bridgeable. The faydra horrify the ivor. The kendall rebate the sher. The kendall rebate the faydra. The kendall is rattling. If something rebate the kendall and it is rattling then the kendall does not like the faydra. If something froth the ivor then the ivor is not rattling. If the kendall horrify the ivor and the ivor horrify the sher then the ivor does not chase the kendall. If something is tidy then it is not rattling. If the kendall horrify the faydra and the faydra does not need the sher then the sher does not like the ivor. If something rebate the sher then the sher is tidy. The sher is tidy.", "logic": "\nTidy(ivor)\nnot Bridgeable(ivor)\nnot Aryan(ivor)\nnot Froth(ivor, sher)\nSenior(sher)\nnot Bridgeable(sher)\nHorrify(faydra, ivor)\nRebate(kendall, sher)\nRebate(kendall, faydra)\nRattling(kendall)\nforall x (Rebate(x, kendall) and Rattling(x) -> not Froth(kendall, faydra))\nforall x (Froth(x, ivor) -> not Rattling(ivor))\nHorrify(kendall, ivor) and Horrify(ivor, sher) -> not Rebate(ivor, kendall)\nforall x (Tidy(x) -> not Rattling(x))\nHorrify(kendall, faydra) and not Horrify(faydra, sher) -> not Froth(sher, ivor)\nforall x (Rebate(x, sher) -> Tidy(sher))\n\nTidy(sher)\n\nRebate(kendall, sher) and forall x (Rebate(x, sher) -> Tidy(sher)) -> therefore Tidy(sher)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The vince is socratic. The vince is not crashing. The vince is not charmed. The vince does not like the carolynn. The carolynn is brunette. The carolynn is not crashing. The vivianna deter the vince. The faustina hawk the carolynn. The faustina hawk the vivianna. The faustina is stingless. If something hawk the faustina and it is stingless then the faustina does not like the vivianna. If something shampoo the vince then the vince is not stingless. If the faustina deter the vince and the vince deter the carolynn then the vince does not chase the faustina. If something is socratic then it is not stingless. If the faustina deter the vivianna and the vivianna does not need the carolynn then the carolynn does not like the vince. If something hawk the carolynn then the carolynn is socratic. The vince is stingless.", "logic": "\nSocratic(vince)\nnot Crashing(vince)\nnot Charmed(vince)\nnot Shampoo(vince, carolynn)\nBrunette(carolynn)\nnot Crashing(carolynn)\nDeter(vivianna, vince)\nHawk(faustina, carolynn)\nHawk(faustina, vivianna)\nStingless(faustina)\nforall x (Hawk(x, faustina) and Stingless(x) -> not Shampoo(faustina, vivianna))\nforall x (Shampoo(x, vince) -> not Stingless(vince))\nDeter(faustina, vince) and Deter(vince, carolynn) -> not Hawk(vince, faustina)\nforall x (Socratic(x) -> not Stingless(x))\nDeter(faustina, vivianna) and not Deter(vivianna, carolynn) -> not Shampoo(carolynn, vince)\nforall x (Hawk(x, carolynn) -> Socratic(carolynn))\n\nStingless(vince)\n\nSocratic(vince) and forall x (Socratic(x) -> not Stingless(x)) -> therefore not Stingless(vince)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The dallas is oviform. The dallas is not forbidden. The dallas is not framed. The dallas does not like the ina. The ina is wheezing. The ina is not forbidden. The garp evade the dallas. The quintana wallow the ina. The quintana wallow the garp. The quintana is gamey. If something wallow the quintana and it is gamey then the quintana does not like the garp. If something canopy the dallas then the dallas is not gamey. If the quintana evade the dallas and the dallas evade the ina then the dallas does not chase the quintana. If something is oviform then it is not gamey. If the quintana evade the garp and the garp does not need the ina then the ina does not like the dallas. If something wallow the ina then the ina is oviform. The ina is not gamey.", "logic": "\nOviform(dallas)\nnot Forbidden(dallas)\nnot Framed(dallas)\nnot Canopy(dallas, ina)\nWheezing(ina)\nnot Forbidden(ina)\nEvade(garp, dallas)\nWallow(quintana, ina)\nWallow(quintana, garp)\nGamey(quintana)\nforall x (Wallow(x, quintana) and Gamey(x) -> not Canopy(quintana, garp))\nforall x (Canopy(x, dallas) -> not Gamey(dallas))\nEvade(quintana, dallas) and Evade(dallas, ina) -> not Wallow(dallas, quintana)\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> not Gamey(x))\nEvade(quintana, garp) and not Evade(garp, ina) -> not Canopy(ina, dallas)\nforall x (Wallow(x, ina) -> Oviform(ina))\n\nnot Gamey(ina)\n\nWallow(quintana, ina) and forall x (Wallow(x, ina) -> Oviform(ina)) -> therefore Oviform(ina) Oviform(ina) and forall x (Oviform(x) -> not Gamey(x)) -> therefore not Gamey(ina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The reg is enduring. The reg is not profane. The reg is not jocose. The reg does not like the virginie. The virginie is bounteous. The virginie is not profane. The fran expatriate the reg. The beverlee stenograph the virginie. The beverlee stenograph the fran. The beverlee is weepy. If something stenograph the beverlee and it is weepy then the beverlee does not like the fran. If something prehend the reg then the reg is not weepy. If the beverlee expatriate the reg and the reg expatriate the virginie then the reg does not chase the beverlee. If something is enduring then it is not weepy. If the beverlee expatriate the fran and the fran does not need the virginie then the virginie does not like the reg. If something stenograph the virginie then the virginie is enduring. The virginie is weepy.", "logic": "\nEnduring(reg)\nnot Profane(reg)\nnot Jocose(reg)\nnot Prehend(reg, virginie)\nBounteous(virginie)\nnot Profane(virginie)\nExpatriate(fran, reg)\nStenograph(beverlee, virginie)\nStenograph(beverlee, fran)\nWeepy(beverlee)\nforall x (Stenograph(x, beverlee) and Weepy(x) -> not Prehend(beverlee, fran))\nforall x (Prehend(x, reg) -> not Weepy(reg))\nExpatriate(beverlee, reg) and Expatriate(reg, virginie) -> not Stenograph(reg, beverlee)\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> not Weepy(x))\nExpatriate(beverlee, fran) and not Expatriate(fran, virginie) -> not Prehend(virginie, reg)\nforall x (Stenograph(x, virginie) -> Enduring(virginie))\n\nWeepy(virginie)\n\nStenograph(beverlee, virginie) and forall x (Stenograph(x, virginie) -> Enduring(virginie)) -> therefore Enduring(virginie) Enduring(virginie) and forall x (Enduring(x) -> not Weepy(x)) -> therefore not Weepy(virginie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The neely is aired. The neely is not rearmost. The neely is not anodic. The neely does not like the joline. The joline is operative. The joline is not rearmost. The elvina convolve the neely. The winfred autotomise the joline. The winfred autotomise the elvina. The winfred is gooey. If something autotomise the winfred and it is gooey then the winfred does not like the elvina. If something redecorate the neely then the neely is not gooey. If the winfred convolve the neely and the neely convolve the joline then the neely does not chase the winfred. If something is aired then it is not gooey. If the winfred convolve the elvina and the elvina does not need the joline then the joline does not like the neely. If something autotomise the joline then the joline is aired. The neely does not like the neely.", "logic": "\nAired(neely)\nnot Rearmost(neely)\nnot Anodic(neely)\nnot Redecorate(neely, joline)\nOperative(joline)\nnot Rearmost(joline)\nConvolve(elvina, neely)\nAutotomise(winfred, joline)\nAutotomise(winfred, elvina)\nGooey(winfred)\nforall x (Autotomise(x, winfred) and Gooey(x) -> not Redecorate(winfred, elvina))\nforall x (Redecorate(x, neely) -> not Gooey(neely))\nConvolve(winfred, neely) and Convolve(neely, joline) -> not Autotomise(neely, winfred)\nforall x (Aired(x) -> not Gooey(x))\nConvolve(winfred, elvina) and not Convolve(elvina, joline) -> not Redecorate(joline, neely)\nforall x (Autotomise(x, joline) -> Aired(joline))\n\nnot Redecorate(neely, neely)\n\nnot Redecorate(neely, neely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The vittoria is ranking. The vittoria is not enteral. The vittoria is not abomasal. The vittoria does not like the beverly. The beverly is petrifying. The beverly is not enteral. The bradford quadruple the vittoria. The violante seclude the beverly. The violante seclude the bradford. The violante is clattery. If something seclude the violante and it is clattery then the violante does not like the bradford. If something moulder the vittoria then the vittoria is not clattery. If the violante quadruple the vittoria and the vittoria quadruple the beverly then the vittoria does not chase the violante. If something is ranking then it is not clattery. If the violante quadruple the bradford and the bradford does not need the beverly then the beverly does not like the vittoria. If something seclude the beverly then the beverly is ranking. The vittoria seclude the bradford.", "logic": "\nRanking(vittoria)\nnot Enteral(vittoria)\nnot Abomasal(vittoria)\nnot Moulder(vittoria, beverly)\nPetrifying(beverly)\nnot Enteral(beverly)\nQuadruple(bradford, vittoria)\nSeclude(violante, beverly)\nSeclude(violante, bradford)\nClattery(violante)\nforall x (Seclude(x, violante) and Clattery(x) -> not Moulder(violante, bradford))\nforall x (Moulder(x, vittoria) -> not Clattery(vittoria))\nQuadruple(violante, vittoria) and Quadruple(vittoria, beverly) -> not Seclude(vittoria, violante)\nforall x (Ranking(x) -> not Clattery(x))\nQuadruple(violante, bradford) and not Quadruple(bradford, beverly) -> not Moulder(beverly, vittoria)\nforall x (Seclude(x, beverly) -> Ranking(beverly))\n\nSeclude(vittoria, bradford)\n\nSeclude(vittoria, bradford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The berta is apopemptic. The berta is not coronary. The berta is not unthematic. The berta does not like the harrie. The harrie is untimely. The harrie is not coronary. The verile impel the berta. The sioux improve the harrie. The sioux improve the verile. The sioux is unromantic. If something improve the sioux and it is unromantic then the sioux does not like the verile. If something underrate the berta then the berta is not unromantic. If the sioux impel the berta and the berta impel the harrie then the berta does not chase the sioux. If something is apopemptic then it is not unromantic. If the sioux impel the verile and the verile does not need the harrie then the harrie does not like the berta. If something improve the harrie then the harrie is apopemptic. The sioux does not like the berta.", "logic": "\nApopemptic(berta)\nnot Coronary(berta)\nnot Unthematic(berta)\nnot Underrate(berta, harrie)\nUntimely(harrie)\nnot Coronary(harrie)\nImpel(verile, berta)\nImprove(sioux, harrie)\nImprove(sioux, verile)\nUnromantic(sioux)\nforall x (Improve(x, sioux) and Unromantic(x) -> not Underrate(sioux, verile))\nforall x (Underrate(x, berta) -> not Unromantic(berta))\nImpel(sioux, berta) and Impel(berta, harrie) -> not Improve(berta, sioux)\nforall x (Apopemptic(x) -> not Unromantic(x))\nImpel(sioux, verile) and not Impel(verile, harrie) -> not Underrate(harrie, berta)\nforall x (Improve(x, harrie) -> Apopemptic(harrie))\n\nnot Underrate(sioux, berta)\n\nnot Underrate(sioux, berta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The monica is ideational. The monica is not uncoated. The monica is not pinstriped. The monica does not like the garnet. The garnet is megascopic. The garnet is not uncoated. The lucretia emancipate the monica. The randee thrash the garnet. The randee thrash the lucretia. The randee is earlier. If something thrash the randee and it is earlier then the randee does not like the lucretia. If something gear the monica then the monica is not earlier. If the randee emancipate the monica and the monica emancipate the garnet then the monica does not chase the randee. If something is ideational then it is not earlier. If the randee emancipate the lucretia and the lucretia does not need the garnet then the garnet does not like the monica. If something thrash the garnet then the garnet is ideational. The randee gear the lucretia.", "logic": "\nIdeational(monica)\nnot Uncoated(monica)\nnot Pinstriped(monica)\nnot Gear(monica, garnet)\nMegascopic(garnet)\nnot Uncoated(garnet)\nEmancipate(lucretia, monica)\nThrash(randee, garnet)\nThrash(randee, lucretia)\nEarlier(randee)\nforall x (Thrash(x, randee) and Earlier(x) -> not Gear(randee, lucretia))\nforall x (Gear(x, monica) -> not Earlier(monica))\nEmancipate(randee, monica) and Emancipate(monica, garnet) -> not Thrash(monica, randee)\nforall x (Ideational(x) -> not Earlier(x))\nEmancipate(randee, lucretia) and not Emancipate(lucretia, garnet) -> not Gear(garnet, monica)\nforall x (Thrash(x, garnet) -> Ideational(garnet))\n\nGear(randee, lucretia)\n\nGear(randee, lucretia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The tarah is toothless. The tarah is not obscure. The tarah is not soured. The tarah does not like the prent. The prent is lithuanian. The prent is not obscure. The kathryne comprise the tarah. The blanch tense the prent. The blanch tense the kathryne. The blanch is northern. If something tense the blanch and it is northern then the blanch does not like the kathryne. If something surfboard the tarah then the tarah is not northern. If the blanch comprise the tarah and the tarah comprise the prent then the tarah does not chase the blanch. If something is toothless then it is not northern. If the blanch comprise the kathryne and the kathryne does not need the prent then the prent does not like the tarah. If something tense the prent then the prent is toothless. The prent does not like the tarah.", "logic": "\nToothless(tarah)\nnot Obscure(tarah)\nnot Soured(tarah)\nnot Surfboard(tarah, prent)\nLithuanian(prent)\nnot Obscure(prent)\nComprise(kathryne, tarah)\nTense(blanch, prent)\nTense(blanch, kathryne)\nNorthern(blanch)\nforall x (Tense(x, blanch) and Northern(x) -> not Surfboard(blanch, kathryne))\nforall x (Surfboard(x, tarah) -> not Northern(tarah))\nComprise(blanch, tarah) and Comprise(tarah, prent) -> not Tense(tarah, blanch)\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> not Northern(x))\nComprise(blanch, kathryne) and not Comprise(kathryne, prent) -> not Surfboard(prent, tarah)\nforall x (Tense(x, prent) -> Toothless(prent))\n\nnot Surfboard(prent, tarah)\n\nnot Surfboard(prent, tarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The sabrina is ungentle. The sabrina is not specious. The sabrina is not extreme. The sabrina does not like the pascal. The pascal is sapphirine. The pascal is not specious. The giovanni troop the sabrina. The sonnie reship the pascal. The sonnie reship the giovanni. The sonnie is shadowed. If something reship the sonnie and it is shadowed then the sonnie does not like the giovanni. If something expurgate the sabrina then the sabrina is not shadowed. If the sonnie troop the sabrina and the sabrina troop the pascal then the sabrina does not chase the sonnie. If something is ungentle then it is not shadowed. If the sonnie troop the giovanni and the giovanni does not need the pascal then the pascal does not like the sabrina. If something reship the pascal then the pascal is ungentle. The sonnie troop the sonnie.", "logic": "\nUngentle(sabrina)\nnot Specious(sabrina)\nnot Extreme(sabrina)\nnot Expurgate(sabrina, pascal)\nSapphirine(pascal)\nnot Specious(pascal)\nTroop(giovanni, sabrina)\nReship(sonnie, pascal)\nReship(sonnie, giovanni)\nShadowed(sonnie)\nforall x (Reship(x, sonnie) and Shadowed(x) -> not Expurgate(sonnie, giovanni))\nforall x (Expurgate(x, sabrina) -> not Shadowed(sabrina))\nTroop(sonnie, sabrina) and Troop(sabrina, pascal) -> not Reship(sabrina, sonnie)\nforall x (Ungentle(x) -> not Shadowed(x))\nTroop(sonnie, giovanni) and not Troop(giovanni, pascal) -> not Expurgate(pascal, sabrina)\nforall x (Reship(x, pascal) -> Ungentle(pascal))\n\nTroop(sonnie, sonnie)\n\nTroop(sonnie, sonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-473"} {"premises": "The emiline does not like the sloan. The sloan interbreed the emiline. The sloan does not like the emiline. If someone interbreed the emiline and the emiline is anurous then they do not like the emiline. If someone disesteem the sloan then they like the emiline. If someone interbreed the emiline and the emiline does not eat the sloan then the sloan does not need the emiline. If someone is anurous and not avenged then they need the sloan. If the sloan disesteem the emiline then the emiline does not need the sloan. If someone interbreed the emiline then the emiline disesteem the sloan. The sloan does not like the emiline.", "logic": "\nnot Jazz(emiline, sloan)\nInterbreed(sloan, emiline)\nnot Jazz(sloan, emiline)\nforall x (Interbreed(x, emiline) and Anurous(emiline) -> not Jazz(x, emiline))\nforall x (Disesteem(x, sloan) -> Jazz(x, emiline))\nforall x (Interbreed(x, emiline) and not Interbreed(emiline, sloan) -> not Disesteem(sloan, emiline))\nforall x (Anurous(x) and not Avenged(x) -> Disesteem(x, sloan))\nDisesteem(sloan, emiline) -> not Disesteem(emiline, sloan)\nforall x (Interbreed(x, emiline) -> Disesteem(emiline, sloan))\n\nnot Jazz(sloan, emiline)\n\ntherefore not Jazz(sloan, emiline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The osgood does not like the shanan. The shanan lactate the osgood. The shanan does not like the osgood. If someone lactate the osgood and the osgood is earned then they do not like the osgood. If someone evangelize the shanan then they like the osgood. If someone lactate the osgood and the osgood does not eat the shanan then the shanan does not need the osgood. If someone is earned and not penile then they need the shanan. If the shanan evangelize the osgood then the osgood does not need the shanan. If someone lactate the osgood then the osgood evangelize the shanan. The osgood macadamise the shanan.", "logic": "\nnot Macadamise(osgood, shanan)\nLactate(shanan, osgood)\nnot Macadamise(shanan, osgood)\nforall x (Lactate(x, osgood) and Earned(osgood) -> not Macadamise(x, osgood))\nforall x (Evangelize(x, shanan) -> Macadamise(x, osgood))\nforall x (Lactate(x, osgood) and not Lactate(osgood, shanan) -> not Evangelize(shanan, osgood))\nforall x (Earned(x) and not Penile(x) -> Evangelize(x, shanan))\nEvangelize(shanan, osgood) -> not Evangelize(osgood, shanan)\nforall x (Lactate(x, osgood) -> Evangelize(osgood, shanan))\n\nMacadamise(osgood, shanan)\n\ntherefore not Macadamise(osgood, shanan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The haydon does not like the hilliary. The hilliary waft the haydon. The hilliary does not like the haydon. If someone waft the haydon and the haydon is inducive then they do not like the haydon. If someone nasale the hilliary then they like the haydon. If someone waft the haydon and the haydon does not eat the hilliary then the hilliary does not need the haydon. If someone is inducive and not marly then they need the hilliary. If the hilliary nasale the haydon then the haydon does not need the hilliary. If someone waft the haydon then the haydon nasale the hilliary. The haydon nasale the hilliary.", "logic": "\nnot Excogitate(haydon, hilliary)\nWaft(hilliary, haydon)\nnot Excogitate(hilliary, haydon)\nforall x (Waft(x, haydon) and Inducive(haydon) -> not Excogitate(x, haydon))\nforall x (Nasale(x, hilliary) -> Excogitate(x, haydon))\nforall x (Waft(x, haydon) and not Waft(haydon, hilliary) -> not Nasale(hilliary, haydon))\nforall x (Inducive(x) and not Marly(x) -> Nasale(x, hilliary))\nNasale(hilliary, haydon) -> not Nasale(haydon, hilliary)\nforall x (Waft(x, haydon) -> Nasale(haydon, hilliary))\n\nNasale(haydon, hilliary)\n\nWaft(hilliary, haydon) and forall x (Waft(x, haydon) -> Nasale(haydon, hilliary)) -> therefore Nasale(haydon, hilliary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The vachel does not like the loreen. The loreen archaise the vachel. The loreen does not like the vachel. If someone archaise the vachel and the vachel is botryoid then they do not like the vachel. If someone capsulize the loreen then they like the vachel. If someone archaise the vachel and the vachel does not eat the loreen then the loreen does not need the vachel. If someone is botryoid and not corny then they need the loreen. If the loreen capsulize the vachel then the vachel does not need the loreen. If someone archaise the vachel then the vachel capsulize the loreen. The vachel does not need the loreen.", "logic": "\nnot Jellify(vachel, loreen)\nArchaise(loreen, vachel)\nnot Jellify(loreen, vachel)\nforall x (Archaise(x, vachel) and Botryoid(vachel) -> not Jellify(x, vachel))\nforall x (Capsulize(x, loreen) -> Jellify(x, vachel))\nforall x (Archaise(x, vachel) and not Archaise(vachel, loreen) -> not Capsulize(loreen, vachel))\nforall x (Botryoid(x) and not Corny(x) -> Capsulize(x, loreen))\nCapsulize(loreen, vachel) -> not Capsulize(vachel, loreen)\nforall x (Archaise(x, vachel) -> Capsulize(vachel, loreen))\n\nnot Capsulize(vachel, loreen)\n\nArchaise(loreen, vachel) and forall x (Archaise(x, vachel) -> Capsulize(vachel, loreen)) -> therefore Capsulize(vachel, loreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The bertha does not like the helene. The helene lacquer the bertha. The helene does not like the bertha. If someone lacquer the bertha and the bertha is painless then they do not like the bertha. If someone conciliate the helene then they like the bertha. If someone lacquer the bertha and the bertha does not eat the helene then the helene does not need the bertha. If someone is painless and not countable then they need the helene. If the helene conciliate the bertha then the bertha does not need the helene. If someone lacquer the bertha then the bertha conciliate the helene. The bertha adsorb the bertha.", "logic": "\nnot Adsorb(bertha, helene)\nLacquer(helene, bertha)\nnot Adsorb(helene, bertha)\nforall x (Lacquer(x, bertha) and Painless(bertha) -> not Adsorb(x, bertha))\nforall x (Conciliate(x, helene) -> Adsorb(x, bertha))\nforall x (Lacquer(x, bertha) and not Lacquer(bertha, helene) -> not Conciliate(helene, bertha))\nforall x (Painless(x) and not Countable(x) -> Conciliate(x, helene))\nConciliate(helene, bertha) -> not Conciliate(bertha, helene)\nforall x (Lacquer(x, bertha) -> Conciliate(bertha, helene))\n\nAdsorb(bertha, bertha)\n\nLacquer(helene, bertha) and forall x (Lacquer(x, bertha) -> Conciliate(bertha, helene)) -> therefore Conciliate(bertha, helene) Conciliate(bertha, helene) and forall x (Conciliate(x, helene) -> Adsorb(x, bertha)) -> therefore Adsorb(bertha, bertha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The rees does not like the marylinda. The marylinda overflow the rees. The marylinda does not like the rees. If someone overflow the rees and the rees is unawakened then they do not like the rees. If someone lump the marylinda then they like the rees. If someone overflow the rees and the rees does not eat the marylinda then the marylinda does not need the rees. If someone is unawakened and not twelfth then they need the marylinda. If the marylinda lump the rees then the rees does not need the marylinda. If someone overflow the rees then the rees lump the marylinda. The rees does not like the rees.", "logic": "\nnot Prick(rees, marylinda)\nOverflow(marylinda, rees)\nnot Prick(marylinda, rees)\nforall x (Overflow(x, rees) and Unawakened(rees) -> not Prick(x, rees))\nforall x (Lump(x, marylinda) -> Prick(x, rees))\nforall x (Overflow(x, rees) and not Overflow(rees, marylinda) -> not Lump(marylinda, rees))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and not Twelfth(x) -> Lump(x, marylinda))\nLump(marylinda, rees) -> not Lump(rees, marylinda)\nforall x (Overflow(x, rees) -> Lump(rees, marylinda))\n\nnot Prick(rees, rees)\n\nOverflow(marylinda, rees) and forall x (Overflow(x, rees) -> Lump(rees, marylinda)) -> therefore Lump(rees, marylinda) Lump(rees, marylinda) and forall x (Lump(x, marylinda) -> Prick(x, rees)) -> therefore Prick(rees, rees)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The leigha does not like the mina. The mina warehouse the leigha. The mina does not like the leigha. If someone warehouse the leigha and the leigha is squally then they do not like the leigha. If someone terrace the mina then they like the leigha. If someone warehouse the leigha and the leigha does not eat the mina then the mina does not need the leigha. If someone is squally and not undomestic then they need the mina. If the mina terrace the leigha then the leigha does not need the mina. If someone warehouse the leigha then the leigha terrace the mina. The mina does not need the mina.", "logic": "\nnot Impel(leigha, mina)\nWarehouse(mina, leigha)\nnot Impel(mina, leigha)\nforall x (Warehouse(x, leigha) and Squally(leigha) -> not Impel(x, leigha))\nforall x (Terrace(x, mina) -> Impel(x, leigha))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, leigha) and not Warehouse(leigha, mina) -> not Terrace(mina, leigha))\nforall x (Squally(x) and not Undomestic(x) -> Terrace(x, mina))\nTerrace(mina, leigha) -> not Terrace(leigha, mina)\nforall x (Warehouse(x, leigha) -> Terrace(leigha, mina))\n\nnot Terrace(mina, mina)\n\nforall x (Squally(x) and not Undomestic(x) -> Terrace(x, mina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The garvin does not like the patric. The patric foolproof the garvin. The patric does not like the garvin. If someone foolproof the garvin and the garvin is revocable then they do not like the garvin. If someone palatalize the patric then they like the garvin. If someone foolproof the garvin and the garvin does not eat the patric then the patric does not need the garvin. If someone is revocable and not crossed then they need the patric. If the patric palatalize the garvin then the garvin does not need the patric. If someone foolproof the garvin then the garvin palatalize the patric. The patric is crossed.", "logic": "\nnot Distort(garvin, patric)\nFoolproof(patric, garvin)\nnot Distort(patric, garvin)\nforall x (Foolproof(x, garvin) and Revocable(garvin) -> not Distort(x, garvin))\nforall x (Palatalize(x, patric) -> Distort(x, garvin))\nforall x (Foolproof(x, garvin) and not Foolproof(garvin, patric) -> not Palatalize(patric, garvin))\nforall x (Revocable(x) and not Crossed(x) -> Palatalize(x, patric))\nPalatalize(patric, garvin) -> not Palatalize(garvin, patric)\nforall x (Foolproof(x, garvin) -> Palatalize(garvin, patric))\n\nCrossed(patric)\n\nCrossed(patric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The sherwynd does not like the petr. The petr separate the sherwynd. The petr does not like the sherwynd. If someone separate the sherwynd and the sherwynd is reclusive then they do not like the sherwynd. If someone metalize the petr then they like the sherwynd. If someone separate the sherwynd and the sherwynd does not eat the petr then the petr does not need the sherwynd. If someone is reclusive and not verbatim then they need the petr. If the petr metalize the sherwynd then the sherwynd does not need the petr. If someone separate the sherwynd then the sherwynd metalize the petr. The petr is not reclusive.", "logic": "\nnot Arborise(sherwynd, petr)\nSeparate(petr, sherwynd)\nnot Arborise(petr, sherwynd)\nforall x (Separate(x, sherwynd) and Reclusive(sherwynd) -> not Arborise(x, sherwynd))\nforall x (Metalize(x, petr) -> Arborise(x, sherwynd))\nforall x (Separate(x, sherwynd) and not Separate(sherwynd, petr) -> not Metalize(petr, sherwynd))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) and not Verbatim(x) -> Metalize(x, petr))\nMetalize(petr, sherwynd) -> not Metalize(sherwynd, petr)\nforall x (Separate(x, sherwynd) -> Metalize(sherwynd, petr))\n\nnot Reclusive(petr)\n\nnot Reclusive(petr) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The martin does not like the vonnie. The vonnie subtend the martin. The vonnie does not like the martin. If someone subtend the martin and the martin is lacklustre then they do not like the martin. If someone rely the vonnie then they like the martin. If someone subtend the martin and the martin does not eat the vonnie then the vonnie does not need the martin. If someone is lacklustre and not choleraic then they need the vonnie. If the vonnie rely the martin then the martin does not need the vonnie. If someone subtend the martin then the martin rely the vonnie. The martin is lacklustre.", "logic": "\nnot Wrong(martin, vonnie)\nSubtend(vonnie, martin)\nnot Wrong(vonnie, martin)\nforall x (Subtend(x, martin) and Lacklustre(martin) -> not Wrong(x, martin))\nforall x (Rely(x, vonnie) -> Wrong(x, martin))\nforall x (Subtend(x, martin) and not Subtend(martin, vonnie) -> not Rely(vonnie, martin))\nforall x (Lacklustre(x) and not Choleraic(x) -> Rely(x, vonnie))\nRely(vonnie, martin) -> not Rely(martin, vonnie)\nforall x (Subtend(x, martin) -> Rely(martin, vonnie))\n\nLacklustre(martin)\n\nLacklustre(martin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The stanley does not like the rochester. The rochester reproduce the stanley. The rochester does not like the stanley. If someone reproduce the stanley and the stanley is lamented then they do not like the stanley. If someone launder the rochester then they like the stanley. If someone reproduce the stanley and the stanley does not eat the rochester then the rochester does not need the stanley. If someone is lamented and not wearing then they need the rochester. If the rochester launder the stanley then the stanley does not need the rochester. If someone reproduce the stanley then the stanley launder the rochester. The rochester does not eat the rochester.", "logic": "\nnot Acerbate(stanley, rochester)\nReproduce(rochester, stanley)\nnot Acerbate(rochester, stanley)\nforall x (Reproduce(x, stanley) and Lamented(stanley) -> not Acerbate(x, stanley))\nforall x (Launder(x, rochester) -> Acerbate(x, stanley))\nforall x (Reproduce(x, stanley) and not Reproduce(stanley, rochester) -> not Launder(rochester, stanley))\nforall x (Lamented(x) and not Wearing(x) -> Launder(x, rochester))\nLaunder(rochester, stanley) -> not Launder(stanley, rochester)\nforall x (Reproduce(x, stanley) -> Launder(stanley, rochester))\n\nnot Reproduce(rochester, rochester)\n\nnot Reproduce(rochester, rochester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "The revkah does not like the clarinda. The clarinda egress the revkah. The clarinda does not like the revkah. If someone egress the revkah and the revkah is giving then they do not like the revkah. If someone reschedule the clarinda then they like the revkah. If someone egress the revkah and the revkah does not eat the clarinda then the clarinda does not need the revkah. If someone is giving and not delineated then they need the clarinda. If the clarinda reschedule the revkah then the revkah does not need the clarinda. If someone egress the revkah then the revkah reschedule the clarinda. The revkah is kind.", "logic": "\nnot Centrifuge(revkah, clarinda)\nEgress(clarinda, revkah)\nnot Centrifuge(clarinda, revkah)\nforall x (Egress(x, revkah) and Giving(revkah) -> not Centrifuge(x, revkah))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, clarinda) -> Centrifuge(x, revkah))\nforall x (Egress(x, revkah) and not Egress(revkah, clarinda) -> not Reschedule(clarinda, revkah))\nforall x (Giving(x) and not Delineated(x) -> Reschedule(x, clarinda))\nReschedule(clarinda, revkah) -> not Reschedule(revkah, clarinda)\nforall x (Egress(x, revkah) -> Reschedule(revkah, clarinda))\n\nKind(revkah)\n\nKind(revkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-93"} {"premises": "Caprice is plushy. Hortensia is cottony. Henrique is livery. If Caprice is messianic and Caprice is cottony then Caprice is not plushy. Furry things are masterful. Rough things are plushy. If something is choice and plushy then it is not messianic. Green things are livery. If Hortensia is not livery then Hortensia is masterful. If something is masterful then it is emeritus. If something is cottony and not masterful then it is emeritus. Hortensia is cottony.", "logic": "\nPlushy(caprice)\nCottony(hortensia)\nLivery(henrique)\nMessianic(caprice) and Cottony(caprice) -> not Plushy(caprice)\nforall x (Cottony(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Choice(x) -> Plushy(x))\nforall x (Choice(x) and Plushy(x) -> not Messianic(x))\nforall x (Messianic(x) -> Livery(x))\nnot Livery(hortensia) -> Masterful(hortensia)\nforall x (Masterful(x) -> Emeritus(x))\nforall x (Cottony(x) and not Masterful(x) -> Emeritus(x))\n\nCottony(hortensia)\n\ntherefore Cottony(hortensia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Philly is wysiwyg. Vivyan is oaken. Gertrude is plumbable. If Philly is croatian and Philly is oaken then Philly is not wysiwyg. Furry things are confirmed. Rough things are wysiwyg. If something is unverified and wysiwyg then it is not croatian. Green things are plumbable. If Vivyan is not plumbable then Vivyan is confirmed. If something is confirmed then it is cernuous. If something is oaken and not confirmed then it is cernuous. Gertrude is not plumbable.", "logic": "\nWysiwyg(philly)\nOaken(vivyan)\nPlumbable(gertrude)\nCroatian(philly) and Oaken(philly) -> not Wysiwyg(philly)\nforall x (Oaken(x) -> Confirmed(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) -> Wysiwyg(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) and Wysiwyg(x) -> not Croatian(x))\nforall x (Croatian(x) -> Plumbable(x))\nnot Plumbable(vivyan) -> Confirmed(vivyan)\nforall x (Confirmed(x) -> Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Oaken(x) and not Confirmed(x) -> Cernuous(x))\n\nnot Plumbable(gertrude)\n\ntherefore Plumbable(gertrude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Georgia is moneyed. Sheffield is uncrowded. Goldi is ajar. If Georgia is gummed and Georgia is uncrowded then Georgia is not moneyed. Furry things are excellent. Rough things are moneyed. If something is larger and moneyed then it is not gummed. Green things are ajar. If Sheffield is not ajar then Sheffield is excellent. If something is excellent then it is wroth. If something is uncrowded and not excellent then it is wroth. Sheffield is excellent.", "logic": "\nMoneyed(georgia)\nUncrowded(sheffield)\nAjar(goldi)\nGummed(georgia) and Uncrowded(georgia) -> not Moneyed(georgia)\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Excellent(x))\nforall x (Larger(x) -> Moneyed(x))\nforall x (Larger(x) and Moneyed(x) -> not Gummed(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Ajar(x))\nnot Ajar(sheffield) -> Excellent(sheffield)\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Wroth(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) and not Excellent(x) -> Wroth(x))\n\nExcellent(sheffield)\n\nUncrowded(sheffield) and forall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Excellent(x)) -> therefore Excellent(sheffield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Beulah is latinate. Chickie is occupied. Sebastien is midwestern. If Beulah is tidy and Beulah is occupied then Beulah is not latinate. Furry things are birchen. Rough things are latinate. If something is general and latinate then it is not tidy. Green things are midwestern. If Chickie is not midwestern then Chickie is birchen. If something is birchen then it is unlikable. If something is occupied and not birchen then it is unlikable. Chickie is not birchen.", "logic": "\nLatinate(beulah)\nOccupied(chickie)\nMidwestern(sebastien)\nTidy(beulah) and Occupied(beulah) -> not Latinate(beulah)\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Birchen(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Latinate(x))\nforall x (General(x) and Latinate(x) -> not Tidy(x))\nforall x (Tidy(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nnot Midwestern(chickie) -> Birchen(chickie)\nforall x (Birchen(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) and not Birchen(x) -> Unlikable(x))\n\nnot Birchen(chickie)\n\nOccupied(chickie) and forall x (Occupied(x) -> Birchen(x)) -> therefore Birchen(chickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "George is admittible. Eryn is afire. Chevy is handled. If George is lamarckian and George is afire then George is not admittible. Furry things are alleged. Rough things are admittible. If something is unshaved and admittible then it is not lamarckian. Green things are handled. If Eryn is not handled then Eryn is alleged. If something is alleged then it is esurient. If something is afire and not alleged then it is esurient. Eryn is esurient.", "logic": "\nAdmittible(george)\nAfire(eryn)\nHandled(chevy)\nLamarckian(george) and Afire(george) -> not Admittible(george)\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Alleged(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Admittible(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) and Admittible(x) -> not Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) -> Handled(x))\nnot Handled(eryn) -> Alleged(eryn)\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Esurient(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and not Alleged(x) -> Esurient(x))\n\nEsurient(eryn)\n\nAfire(eryn) and forall x (Afire(x) -> Alleged(x)) -> therefore Alleged(eryn) Alleged(eryn) and forall x (Alleged(x) -> Esurient(x)) -> therefore Esurient(eryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Noella is abatic. Royal is plucky. Noelle is abridged. If Noella is eyelike and Noella is plucky then Noella is not abatic. Furry things are fuscous. Rough things are abatic. If something is slovenly and abatic then it is not eyelike. Green things are abridged. If Royal is not abridged then Royal is fuscous. If something is fuscous then it is anatropous. If something is plucky and not fuscous then it is anatropous. Royal is not anatropous.", "logic": "\nAbatic(noella)\nPlucky(royal)\nAbridged(noelle)\nEyelike(noella) and Plucky(noella) -> not Abatic(noella)\nforall x (Plucky(x) -> Fuscous(x))\nforall x (Slovenly(x) -> Abatic(x))\nforall x (Slovenly(x) and Abatic(x) -> not Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Eyelike(x) -> Abridged(x))\nnot Abridged(royal) -> Fuscous(royal)\nforall x (Fuscous(x) -> Anatropous(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and not Fuscous(x) -> Anatropous(x))\n\nnot Anatropous(royal)\n\nPlucky(royal) and forall x (Plucky(x) -> Fuscous(x)) -> therefore Fuscous(royal) Fuscous(royal) and forall x (Fuscous(x) -> Anatropous(x)) -> therefore Anatropous(royal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Ola is northwest. Karyn is unseen. Brigit is festive. If Ola is sharp and Ola is unseen then Ola is not northwest. Furry things are boozy. Rough things are northwest. If something is synovial and northwest then it is not sharp. Green things are festive. If Karyn is not festive then Karyn is boozy. If something is boozy then it is unripe. If something is unseen and not boozy then it is unripe. Brigit is not northwest.", "logic": "\nNorthwest(ola)\nUnseen(karyn)\nFestive(brigit)\nSharp(ola) and Unseen(ola) -> not Northwest(ola)\nforall x (Unseen(x) -> Boozy(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) and Northwest(x) -> not Sharp(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Festive(x))\nnot Festive(karyn) -> Boozy(karyn)\nforall x (Boozy(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Unseen(x) and not Boozy(x) -> Unripe(x))\n\nnot Northwest(brigit)\n\nforall x (Synovial(x) -> Northwest(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Andrei is undatable. Vena is warning. Prince is presto. If Andrei is judicable and Andrei is warning then Andrei is not undatable. Furry things are surreal. Rough things are undatable. If something is shameful and undatable then it is not judicable. Green things are presto. If Vena is not presto then Vena is surreal. If something is surreal then it is shocking. If something is warning and not surreal then it is shocking. Vena is presto.", "logic": "\nUndatable(andrei)\nWarning(vena)\nPresto(prince)\nJudicable(andrei) and Warning(andrei) -> not Undatable(andrei)\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Surreal(x))\nforall x (Shameful(x) -> Undatable(x))\nforall x (Shameful(x) and Undatable(x) -> not Judicable(x))\nforall x (Judicable(x) -> Presto(x))\nnot Presto(vena) -> Surreal(vena)\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Shocking(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and not Surreal(x) -> Shocking(x))\n\nPresto(vena)\n\nforall x (Judicable(x) -> Presto(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Sayre is miasmic. Evette is backmost. Shani is combatant. If Sayre is unrevealed and Sayre is backmost then Sayre is not miasmic. Furry things are dacitic. Rough things are miasmic. If something is directed and miasmic then it is not unrevealed. Green things are combatant. If Evette is not combatant then Evette is dacitic. If something is dacitic then it is cubelike. If something is backmost and not dacitic then it is cubelike. Shani is not dacitic.", "logic": "\nMiasmic(sayre)\nBackmost(evette)\nCombatant(shani)\nUnrevealed(sayre) and Backmost(sayre) -> not Miasmic(sayre)\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Dacitic(x))\nforall x (Directed(x) -> Miasmic(x))\nforall x (Directed(x) and Miasmic(x) -> not Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Combatant(x))\nnot Combatant(evette) -> Dacitic(evette)\nforall x (Dacitic(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) and not Dacitic(x) -> Cubelike(x))\n\nnot Dacitic(shani)\n\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Dacitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Bride is vacuous. Rey is mystified. Adrianna is sparkling. If Bride is empirical and Bride is mystified then Bride is not vacuous. Furry things are coexistent. Rough things are vacuous. If something is canny and vacuous then it is not empirical. Green things are sparkling. If Rey is not sparkling then Rey is coexistent. If something is coexistent then it is given. If something is mystified and not coexistent then it is given. Adrianna is empirical.", "logic": "\nVacuous(bride)\nMystified(rey)\nSparkling(adrianna)\nEmpirical(bride) and Mystified(bride) -> not Vacuous(bride)\nforall x (Mystified(x) -> Coexistent(x))\nforall x (Canny(x) -> Vacuous(x))\nforall x (Canny(x) and Vacuous(x) -> not Empirical(x))\nforall x (Empirical(x) -> Sparkling(x))\nnot Sparkling(rey) -> Coexistent(rey)\nforall x (Coexistent(x) -> Given(x))\nforall x (Mystified(x) and not Coexistent(x) -> Given(x))\n\nEmpirical(adrianna)\n\nEmpirical(adrianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Claire is postmodern. Emmeline is copesettic. Kassey is offside. If Claire is damnable and Claire is copesettic then Claire is not postmodern. Furry things are lenitive. Rough things are postmodern. If something is absolutist and postmodern then it is not damnable. Green things are offside. If Emmeline is not offside then Emmeline is lenitive. If something is lenitive then it is southern. If something is copesettic and not lenitive then it is southern. Emmeline is not damnable.", "logic": "\nPostmodern(claire)\nCopesettic(emmeline)\nOffside(kassey)\nDamnable(claire) and Copesettic(claire) -> not Postmodern(claire)\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Lenitive(x))\nforall x (Absolutist(x) -> Postmodern(x))\nforall x (Absolutist(x) and Postmodern(x) -> not Damnable(x))\nforall x (Damnable(x) -> Offside(x))\nnot Offside(emmeline) -> Lenitive(emmeline)\nforall x (Lenitive(x) -> Southern(x))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) and not Lenitive(x) -> Southern(x))\n\nnot Damnable(emmeline)\n\nnot Damnable(emmeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "Vibhu is factorial. Vito is beardless. Terina is echoing. If Vibhu is spaced and Vibhu is beardless then Vibhu is not factorial. Furry things are emeritus. Rough things are factorial. If something is ferine and factorial then it is not spaced. Green things are echoing. If Vito is not echoing then Vito is emeritus. If something is emeritus then it is malarial. If something is beardless and not emeritus then it is malarial. Vibhu is ferine.", "logic": "\nFactorial(vibhu)\nBeardless(vito)\nEchoing(terina)\nSpaced(vibhu) and Beardless(vibhu) -> not Factorial(vibhu)\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Emeritus(x))\nforall x (Ferine(x) -> Factorial(x))\nforall x (Ferine(x) and Factorial(x) -> not Spaced(x))\nforall x (Spaced(x) -> Echoing(x))\nnot Echoing(vito) -> Emeritus(vito)\nforall x (Emeritus(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) and not Emeritus(x) -> Malarial(x))\n\nFerine(vibhu)\n\nFerine(vibhu) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2181"} {"premises": "The carolin enrage the arlyne. The morlee vowelise the arlyne. The arlyne decertify the morlee. If someone enrage the arlyne and they visit the carolin then the carolin enrage the morlee. If someone enrage the arlyne then the arlyne vowelise the morlee. If someone vowelise the morlee then the morlee is overproud. The morlee vowelise the arlyne.", "logic": "\nEnrage(carolin, arlyne)\nVowelise(morlee, arlyne)\nDecertify(arlyne, morlee)\nforall x (Enrage(x, arlyne) and Vowelise(x, carolin) -> Enrage(carolin, morlee))\nforall x (Enrage(x, arlyne) -> Vowelise(arlyne, morlee))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, morlee) -> Overproud(morlee))\n\nVowelise(morlee, arlyne)\n\ntherefore Vowelise(morlee, arlyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The atlante coruscate the christa. The mellie force the christa. The christa squawk the mellie. If someone coruscate the christa and they visit the atlante then the atlante coruscate the mellie. If someone coruscate the christa then the christa force the mellie. If someone force the mellie then the mellie is fringy. The mellie does not visit the christa.", "logic": "\nCoruscate(atlante, christa)\nForce(mellie, christa)\nSquawk(christa, mellie)\nforall x (Coruscate(x, christa) and Force(x, atlante) -> Coruscate(atlante, mellie))\nforall x (Coruscate(x, christa) -> Force(christa, mellie))\nforall x (Force(x, mellie) -> Fringy(mellie))\n\nnot Force(mellie, christa)\n\ntherefore Force(mellie, christa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The rene circumfuse the nathaniel. The delmar lysogenize the nathaniel. The nathaniel stupefy the delmar. If someone circumfuse the nathaniel and they visit the rene then the rene circumfuse the delmar. If someone circumfuse the nathaniel then the nathaniel lysogenize the delmar. If someone lysogenize the delmar then the delmar is diagonal. The nathaniel lysogenize the delmar.", "logic": "\nCircumfuse(rene, nathaniel)\nLysogenize(delmar, nathaniel)\nStupefy(nathaniel, delmar)\nforall x (Circumfuse(x, nathaniel) and Lysogenize(x, rene) -> Circumfuse(rene, delmar))\nforall x (Circumfuse(x, nathaniel) -> Lysogenize(nathaniel, delmar))\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, delmar) -> Diagonal(delmar))\n\nLysogenize(nathaniel, delmar)\n\nCircumfuse(rene, nathaniel) and forall x (Circumfuse(x, nathaniel) -> Lysogenize(nathaniel, delmar)) -> therefore Lysogenize(nathaniel, delmar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The ambros caravan the ware. The gladys wassail the ware. The ware deplore the gladys. If someone caravan the ware and they visit the ambros then the ambros caravan the gladys. If someone caravan the ware then the ware wassail the gladys. If someone wassail the gladys then the gladys is every. The ware does not visit the gladys.", "logic": "\nCaravan(ambros, ware)\nWassail(gladys, ware)\nDeplore(ware, gladys)\nforall x (Caravan(x, ware) and Wassail(x, ambros) -> Caravan(ambros, gladys))\nforall x (Caravan(x, ware) -> Wassail(ware, gladys))\nforall x (Wassail(x, gladys) -> Every(gladys))\n\nnot Wassail(ware, gladys)\n\nCaravan(ambros, ware) and forall x (Caravan(x, ware) -> Wassail(ware, gladys)) -> therefore Wassail(ware, gladys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The tiphani evict the kayley. The anabella impair the kayley. The kayley lisp the anabella. If someone evict the kayley and they visit the tiphani then the tiphani evict the anabella. If someone evict the kayley then the kayley impair the anabella. If someone impair the anabella then the anabella is humid. The anabella is humid.", "logic": "\nEvict(tiphani, kayley)\nImpair(anabella, kayley)\nLisp(kayley, anabella)\nforall x (Evict(x, kayley) and Impair(x, tiphani) -> Evict(tiphani, anabella))\nforall x (Evict(x, kayley) -> Impair(kayley, anabella))\nforall x (Impair(x, anabella) -> Humid(anabella))\n\nHumid(anabella)\n\nEvict(tiphani, kayley) and forall x (Evict(x, kayley) -> Impair(kayley, anabella)) -> therefore Impair(kayley, anabella) Impair(kayley, anabella) and forall x (Impair(x, anabella) -> Humid(anabella)) -> therefore Humid(anabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The gabey narrow the kym. The alf embrown the kym. The kym assibilate the alf. If someone narrow the kym and they visit the gabey then the gabey narrow the alf. If someone narrow the kym then the kym embrown the alf. If someone embrown the alf then the alf is pianissimo. The alf is not pianissimo.", "logic": "\nNarrow(gabey, kym)\nEmbrown(alf, kym)\nAssibilate(kym, alf)\nforall x (Narrow(x, kym) and Embrown(x, gabey) -> Narrow(gabey, alf))\nforall x (Narrow(x, kym) -> Embrown(kym, alf))\nforall x (Embrown(x, alf) -> Pianissimo(alf))\n\nnot Pianissimo(alf)\n\nNarrow(gabey, kym) and forall x (Narrow(x, kym) -> Embrown(kym, alf)) -> therefore Embrown(kym, alf) Embrown(kym, alf) and forall x (Embrown(x, alf) -> Pianissimo(alf)) -> therefore Pianissimo(alf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The aile colourise the westley. The andee tampon the westley. The westley whistle the andee. If someone colourise the westley and they visit the aile then the aile colourise the andee. If someone colourise the westley then the westley tampon the andee. If someone tampon the andee then the andee is boric. The aile does not eat the andee.", "logic": "\nColourise(aile, westley)\nTampon(andee, westley)\nWhistle(westley, andee)\nforall x (Colourise(x, westley) and Tampon(x, aile) -> Colourise(aile, andee))\nforall x (Colourise(x, westley) -> Tampon(westley, andee))\nforall x (Tampon(x, andee) -> Boric(andee))\n\nnot Colourise(aile, andee)\n\nforall x (Colourise(x, westley) and Tampon(x, aile) -> Colourise(aile, andee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The dane cuss the eada. The romeo outstay the eada. The eada pounce the romeo. If someone cuss the eada and they visit the dane then the dane cuss the romeo. If someone cuss the eada then the eada outstay the romeo. If someone outstay the romeo then the romeo is ariose. The dane outstay the eada.", "logic": "\nCuss(dane, eada)\nOutstay(romeo, eada)\nPounce(eada, romeo)\nforall x (Cuss(x, eada) and Outstay(x, dane) -> Cuss(dane, romeo))\nforall x (Cuss(x, eada) -> Outstay(eada, romeo))\nforall x (Outstay(x, romeo) -> Ariose(romeo))\n\nOutstay(dane, eada)\n\nOutstay(dane, eada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The elane besot the nettie. The helga foolproof the nettie. The nettie chirr the helga. If someone besot the nettie and they visit the elane then the elane besot the helga. If someone besot the nettie then the nettie foolproof the helga. If someone foolproof the helga then the helga is matchless. The helga does not visit the helga.", "logic": "\nBesot(elane, nettie)\nFoolproof(helga, nettie)\nChirr(nettie, helga)\nforall x (Besot(x, nettie) and Foolproof(x, elane) -> Besot(elane, helga))\nforall x (Besot(x, nettie) -> Foolproof(nettie, helga))\nforall x (Foolproof(x, helga) -> Matchless(helga))\n\nnot Foolproof(helga, helga)\n\nnot Foolproof(helga, helga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The miran uncompress the guillaume. The ophelie cheat the guillaume. The guillaume budge the ophelie. If someone uncompress the guillaume and they visit the miran then the miran uncompress the ophelie. If someone uncompress the guillaume then the guillaume cheat the ophelie. If someone cheat the ophelie then the ophelie is equatorial. The ophelie budge the miran.", "logic": "\nUncompress(miran, guillaume)\nCheat(ophelie, guillaume)\nBudge(guillaume, ophelie)\nforall x (Uncompress(x, guillaume) and Cheat(x, miran) -> Uncompress(miran, ophelie))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, guillaume) -> Cheat(guillaume, ophelie))\nforall x (Cheat(x, ophelie) -> Equatorial(ophelie))\n\nBudge(ophelie, miran)\n\nBudge(ophelie, miran) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The hadrian succour the pavla. The ramesh habituate the pavla. The pavla enshroud the ramesh. If someone succour the pavla and they visit the hadrian then the hadrian succour the ramesh. If someone succour the pavla then the pavla habituate the ramesh. If someone habituate the ramesh then the ramesh is braised. The hadrian does not see the pavla.", "logic": "\nSuccour(hadrian, pavla)\nHabituate(ramesh, pavla)\nEnshroud(pavla, ramesh)\nforall x (Succour(x, pavla) and Habituate(x, hadrian) -> Succour(hadrian, ramesh))\nforall x (Succour(x, pavla) -> Habituate(pavla, ramesh))\nforall x (Habituate(x, ramesh) -> Braised(ramesh))\n\nnot Enshroud(hadrian, pavla)\n\nnot Enshroud(hadrian, pavla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The cora dehumidify the consolata. The irwin uniform the consolata. The consolata haggle the irwin. If someone dehumidify the consolata and they visit the cora then the cora dehumidify the irwin. If someone dehumidify the consolata then the consolata uniform the irwin. If someone uniform the irwin then the irwin is acrogenic. The consolata is acrogenic.", "logic": "\nDehumidify(cora, consolata)\nUniform(irwin, consolata)\nHaggle(consolata, irwin)\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, consolata) and Uniform(x, cora) -> Dehumidify(cora, irwin))\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, consolata) -> Uniform(consolata, irwin))\nforall x (Uniform(x, irwin) -> Acrogenic(irwin))\n\nAcrogenic(consolata)\n\nAcrogenic(consolata) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1794"} {"premises": "The pate enroll the spiros. The timmy taboo the pate. The micah unhorse the spiros. The spiros taboo the timmy. If something enroll the micah then the micah unhorse the pate. If something taboo the timmy and it unhorse the timmy then the timmy taboo the micah. If something enroll the micah then it enroll the spiros. If the spiros is aluminous then the spiros taboo the timmy. If something enroll the micah and it is aluminous then the micah enroll the spiros. Cold things are erratic. If something unhorse the spiros then the spiros is honourable. If something unhorse the timmy and the timmy unhorse the spiros then the timmy unhorse the pate. The micah unhorse the spiros.", "logic": "\nEnroll(pate, spiros)\nTaboo(timmy, pate)\nUnhorse(micah, spiros)\nTaboo(spiros, timmy)\nforall x (Enroll(x, micah) -> Unhorse(micah, pate))\nforall x (Taboo(x, timmy) and Unhorse(x, timmy) -> Taboo(timmy, micah))\nforall x (Enroll(x, micah) -> Enroll(x, spiros))\nAluminous(spiros) -> Taboo(spiros, timmy)\nforall x (Enroll(x, micah) and Aluminous(x) -> Enroll(micah, spiros))\nforall x (Honourable(x) -> Erratic(x))\nforall x (Unhorse(x, spiros) -> Honourable(spiros))\nforall x (Unhorse(x, timmy) and Unhorse(timmy, spiros) -> Unhorse(timmy, pate))\n\nUnhorse(micah, spiros)\n\ntherefore Unhorse(micah, spiros)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The waylen asphyxiate the jaleh. The willamina footnote the waylen. The ebeneser bridle the jaleh. The jaleh footnote the willamina. If something asphyxiate the ebeneser then the ebeneser bridle the waylen. If something footnote the willamina and it bridle the willamina then the willamina footnote the ebeneser. If something asphyxiate the ebeneser then it asphyxiate the jaleh. If the jaleh is slipping then the jaleh footnote the willamina. If something asphyxiate the ebeneser and it is slipping then the ebeneser asphyxiate the jaleh. Cold things are traumatic. If something bridle the jaleh then the jaleh is unreserved. If something bridle the willamina and the willamina bridle the jaleh then the willamina bridle the waylen. The jaleh does not eat the willamina.", "logic": "\nAsphyxiate(waylen, jaleh)\nFootnote(willamina, waylen)\nBridle(ebeneser, jaleh)\nFootnote(jaleh, willamina)\nforall x (Asphyxiate(x, ebeneser) -> Bridle(ebeneser, waylen))\nforall x (Footnote(x, willamina) and Bridle(x, willamina) -> Footnote(willamina, ebeneser))\nforall x (Asphyxiate(x, ebeneser) -> Asphyxiate(x, jaleh))\nSlipping(jaleh) -> Footnote(jaleh, willamina)\nforall x (Asphyxiate(x, ebeneser) and Slipping(x) -> Asphyxiate(ebeneser, jaleh))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) -> Traumatic(x))\nforall x (Bridle(x, jaleh) -> Unreserved(jaleh))\nforall x (Bridle(x, willamina) and Bridle(willamina, jaleh) -> Bridle(willamina, waylen))\n\nnot Footnote(jaleh, willamina)\n\ntherefore Footnote(jaleh, willamina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The caroline disembowel the aurelie. The maurits extort the caroline. The catharina pucker the aurelie. The aurelie extort the maurits. If something disembowel the catharina then the catharina pucker the caroline. If something extort the maurits and it pucker the maurits then the maurits extort the catharina. If something disembowel the catharina then it disembowel the aurelie. If the aurelie is sanctified then the aurelie extort the maurits. If something disembowel the catharina and it is sanctified then the catharina disembowel the aurelie. Cold things are upbound. If something pucker the aurelie then the aurelie is coppery. If something pucker the maurits and the maurits pucker the aurelie then the maurits pucker the caroline. The aurelie is coppery.", "logic": "\nDisembowel(caroline, aurelie)\nExtort(maurits, caroline)\nPucker(catharina, aurelie)\nExtort(aurelie, maurits)\nforall x (Disembowel(x, catharina) -> Pucker(catharina, caroline))\nforall x (Extort(x, maurits) and Pucker(x, maurits) -> Extort(maurits, catharina))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, catharina) -> Disembowel(x, aurelie))\nSanctified(aurelie) -> Extort(aurelie, maurits)\nforall x (Disembowel(x, catharina) and Sanctified(x) -> Disembowel(catharina, aurelie))\nforall x (Coppery(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Pucker(x, aurelie) -> Coppery(aurelie))\nforall x (Pucker(x, maurits) and Pucker(maurits, aurelie) -> Pucker(maurits, caroline))\n\nCoppery(aurelie)\n\nPucker(catharina, aurelie) and forall x (Pucker(x, aurelie) -> Coppery(aurelie)) -> therefore Coppery(aurelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The mechelle caddie the elric. The christa pledge the mechelle. The danice wall the elric. The elric pledge the christa. If something caddie the danice then the danice wall the mechelle. If something pledge the christa and it wall the christa then the christa pledge the danice. If something caddie the danice then it caddie the elric. If the elric is unopened then the elric pledge the christa. If something caddie the danice and it is unopened then the danice caddie the elric. Cold things are lumpen. If something wall the elric then the elric is proximate. If something wall the christa and the christa wall the elric then the christa wall the mechelle. The elric is not proximate.", "logic": "\nCaddie(mechelle, elric)\nPledge(christa, mechelle)\nWall(danice, elric)\nPledge(elric, christa)\nforall x (Caddie(x, danice) -> Wall(danice, mechelle))\nforall x (Pledge(x, christa) and Wall(x, christa) -> Pledge(christa, danice))\nforall x (Caddie(x, danice) -> Caddie(x, elric))\nUnopened(elric) -> Pledge(elric, christa)\nforall x (Caddie(x, danice) and Unopened(x) -> Caddie(danice, elric))\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Lumpen(x))\nforall x (Wall(x, elric) -> Proximate(elric))\nforall x (Wall(x, christa) and Wall(christa, elric) -> Wall(christa, mechelle))\n\nnot Proximate(elric)\n\nWall(danice, elric) and forall x (Wall(x, elric) -> Proximate(elric)) -> therefore Proximate(elric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The rod exhilarate the rissa. The octavius fuse the rod. The lonni aestivate the rissa. The rissa fuse the octavius. If something exhilarate the lonni then the lonni aestivate the rod. If something fuse the octavius and it aestivate the octavius then the octavius fuse the lonni. If something exhilarate the lonni then it exhilarate the rissa. If the rissa is wildcat then the rissa fuse the octavius. If something exhilarate the lonni and it is wildcat then the lonni exhilarate the rissa. Cold things are empurpled. If something aestivate the rissa then the rissa is iranian. If something aestivate the octavius and the octavius aestivate the rissa then the octavius aestivate the rod. The rissa is empurpled.", "logic": "\nExhilarate(rod, rissa)\nFuse(octavius, rod)\nAestivate(lonni, rissa)\nFuse(rissa, octavius)\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, lonni) -> Aestivate(lonni, rod))\nforall x (Fuse(x, octavius) and Aestivate(x, octavius) -> Fuse(octavius, lonni))\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, lonni) -> Exhilarate(x, rissa))\nWildcat(rissa) -> Fuse(rissa, octavius)\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, lonni) and Wildcat(x) -> Exhilarate(lonni, rissa))\nforall x (Iranian(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, rissa) -> Iranian(rissa))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, octavius) and Aestivate(octavius, rissa) -> Aestivate(octavius, rod))\n\nEmpurpled(rissa)\n\nAestivate(lonni, rissa) and forall x (Aestivate(x, rissa) -> Iranian(rissa)) -> therefore Iranian(rissa) Iranian(rissa) and forall x (Iranian(x) -> Empurpled(x)) -> therefore Empurpled(rissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The vergil theologise the marry. The gilberto squall the vergil. The sterne scrape the marry. The marry squall the gilberto. If something theologise the sterne then the sterne scrape the vergil. If something squall the gilberto and it scrape the gilberto then the gilberto squall the sterne. If something theologise the sterne then it theologise the marry. If the marry is toed then the marry squall the gilberto. If something theologise the sterne and it is toed then the sterne theologise the marry. Cold things are intertidal. If something scrape the marry then the marry is grim. If something scrape the gilberto and the gilberto scrape the marry then the gilberto scrape the vergil. The marry is not intertidal.", "logic": "\nTheologise(vergil, marry)\nSquall(gilberto, vergil)\nScrape(sterne, marry)\nSquall(marry, gilberto)\nforall x (Theologise(x, sterne) -> Scrape(sterne, vergil))\nforall x (Squall(x, gilberto) and Scrape(x, gilberto) -> Squall(gilberto, sterne))\nforall x (Theologise(x, sterne) -> Theologise(x, marry))\nToed(marry) -> Squall(marry, gilberto)\nforall x (Theologise(x, sterne) and Toed(x) -> Theologise(sterne, marry))\nforall x (Grim(x) -> Intertidal(x))\nforall x (Scrape(x, marry) -> Grim(marry))\nforall x (Scrape(x, gilberto) and Scrape(gilberto, marry) -> Scrape(gilberto, vergil))\n\nnot Intertidal(marry)\n\nScrape(sterne, marry) and forall x (Scrape(x, marry) -> Grim(marry)) -> therefore Grim(marry) Grim(marry) and forall x (Grim(x) -> Intertidal(x)) -> therefore Intertidal(marry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The theressa earmark the berrie. The maybelle impel the theressa. The marcellus scrape the berrie. The berrie impel the maybelle. If something earmark the marcellus then the marcellus scrape the theressa. If something impel the maybelle and it scrape the maybelle then the maybelle impel the marcellus. If something earmark the marcellus then it earmark the berrie. If the berrie is tragicomic then the berrie impel the maybelle. If something earmark the marcellus and it is tragicomic then the marcellus earmark the berrie. Cold things are blind. If something scrape the berrie then the berrie is regardful. If something scrape the maybelle and the maybelle scrape the berrie then the maybelle scrape the theressa. The theressa is not blind.", "logic": "\nEarmark(theressa, berrie)\nImpel(maybelle, theressa)\nScrape(marcellus, berrie)\nImpel(berrie, maybelle)\nforall x (Earmark(x, marcellus) -> Scrape(marcellus, theressa))\nforall x (Impel(x, maybelle) and Scrape(x, maybelle) -> Impel(maybelle, marcellus))\nforall x (Earmark(x, marcellus) -> Earmark(x, berrie))\nTragicomic(berrie) -> Impel(berrie, maybelle)\nforall x (Earmark(x, marcellus) and Tragicomic(x) -> Earmark(marcellus, berrie))\nforall x (Regardful(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Scrape(x, berrie) -> Regardful(berrie))\nforall x (Scrape(x, maybelle) and Scrape(maybelle, berrie) -> Scrape(maybelle, theressa))\n\nnot Blind(theressa)\n\nforall x (Regardful(x) -> Blind(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The winna treble the katrinka. The kizzie convene the winna. The donn reenact the katrinka. The katrinka convene the kizzie. If something treble the donn then the donn reenact the winna. If something convene the kizzie and it reenact the kizzie then the kizzie convene the donn. If something treble the donn then it treble the katrinka. If the katrinka is snug then the katrinka convene the kizzie. If something treble the donn and it is snug then the donn treble the katrinka. Cold things are multiple. If something reenact the katrinka then the katrinka is cairned. If something reenact the kizzie and the kizzie reenact the katrinka then the kizzie reenact the winna. The donn is multiple.", "logic": "\nTreble(winna, katrinka)\nConvene(kizzie, winna)\nReenact(donn, katrinka)\nConvene(katrinka, kizzie)\nforall x (Treble(x, donn) -> Reenact(donn, winna))\nforall x (Convene(x, kizzie) and Reenact(x, kizzie) -> Convene(kizzie, donn))\nforall x (Treble(x, donn) -> Treble(x, katrinka))\nSnug(katrinka) -> Convene(katrinka, kizzie)\nforall x (Treble(x, donn) and Snug(x) -> Treble(donn, katrinka))\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Multiple(x))\nforall x (Reenact(x, katrinka) -> Cairned(katrinka))\nforall x (Reenact(x, kizzie) and Reenact(kizzie, katrinka) -> Reenact(kizzie, winna))\n\nMultiple(donn)\n\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Multiple(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The chet palisade the bernita. The ruben suction the chet. The milissent reave the bernita. The bernita suction the ruben. If something palisade the milissent then the milissent reave the chet. If something suction the ruben and it reave the ruben then the ruben suction the milissent. If something palisade the milissent then it palisade the bernita. If the bernita is scenic then the bernita suction the ruben. If something palisade the milissent and it is scenic then the milissent palisade the bernita. Cold things are subscribed. If something reave the bernita then the bernita is permeant. If something reave the ruben and the ruben reave the bernita then the ruben reave the chet. The ruben is not subscribed.", "logic": "\nPalisade(chet, bernita)\nSuction(ruben, chet)\nReave(milissent, bernita)\nSuction(bernita, ruben)\nforall x (Palisade(x, milissent) -> Reave(milissent, chet))\nforall x (Suction(x, ruben) and Reave(x, ruben) -> Suction(ruben, milissent))\nforall x (Palisade(x, milissent) -> Palisade(x, bernita))\nScenic(bernita) -> Suction(bernita, ruben)\nforall x (Palisade(x, milissent) and Scenic(x) -> Palisade(milissent, bernita))\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Subscribed(x))\nforall x (Reave(x, bernita) -> Permeant(bernita))\nforall x (Reave(x, ruben) and Reave(ruben, bernita) -> Reave(ruben, chet))\n\nnot Subscribed(ruben)\n\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Subscribed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The aubine satisfice the yovonnda. The curt skylark the aubine. The pinchas bleep the yovonnda. The yovonnda skylark the curt. If something satisfice the pinchas then the pinchas bleep the aubine. If something skylark the curt and it bleep the curt then the curt skylark the pinchas. If something satisfice the pinchas then it satisfice the yovonnda. If the yovonnda is vincible then the yovonnda skylark the curt. If something satisfice the pinchas and it is vincible then the pinchas satisfice the yovonnda. Cold things are sickening. If something bleep the yovonnda then the yovonnda is confined. If something bleep the curt and the curt bleep the yovonnda then the curt bleep the aubine. The aubine is vincible.", "logic": "\nSatisfice(aubine, yovonnda)\nSkylark(curt, aubine)\nBleep(pinchas, yovonnda)\nSkylark(yovonnda, curt)\nforall x (Satisfice(x, pinchas) -> Bleep(pinchas, aubine))\nforall x (Skylark(x, curt) and Bleep(x, curt) -> Skylark(curt, pinchas))\nforall x (Satisfice(x, pinchas) -> Satisfice(x, yovonnda))\nVincible(yovonnda) -> Skylark(yovonnda, curt)\nforall x (Satisfice(x, pinchas) and Vincible(x) -> Satisfice(pinchas, yovonnda))\nforall x (Confined(x) -> Sickening(x))\nforall x (Bleep(x, yovonnda) -> Confined(yovonnda))\nforall x (Bleep(x, curt) and Bleep(curt, yovonnda) -> Bleep(curt, aubine))\n\nVincible(aubine)\n\nVincible(aubine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The xenia convolute the sol. The delila ruckle the xenia. The corrie remark the sol. The sol ruckle the delila. If something convolute the corrie then the corrie remark the xenia. If something ruckle the delila and it remark the delila then the delila ruckle the corrie. If something convolute the corrie then it convolute the sol. If the sol is uricosuric then the sol ruckle the delila. If something convolute the corrie and it is uricosuric then the corrie convolute the sol. Cold things are enraged. If something remark the sol then the sol is civilian. If something remark the delila and the delila remark the sol then the delila remark the xenia. The sol does not visit the delila.", "logic": "\nConvolute(xenia, sol)\nRuckle(delila, xenia)\nRemark(corrie, sol)\nRuckle(sol, delila)\nforall x (Convolute(x, corrie) -> Remark(corrie, xenia))\nforall x (Ruckle(x, delila) and Remark(x, delila) -> Ruckle(delila, corrie))\nforall x (Convolute(x, corrie) -> Convolute(x, sol))\nUricosuric(sol) -> Ruckle(sol, delila)\nforall x (Convolute(x, corrie) and Uricosuric(x) -> Convolute(corrie, sol))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Enraged(x))\nforall x (Remark(x, sol) -> Civilian(sol))\nforall x (Remark(x, delila) and Remark(delila, sol) -> Remark(delila, xenia))\n\nnot Convolute(sol, delila)\n\nnot Convolute(sol, delila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The elianora butterfly the mathilde. The yves golf the elianora. The paige execrate the mathilde. The mathilde golf the yves. If something butterfly the paige then the paige execrate the elianora. If something golf the yves and it execrate the yves then the yves golf the paige. If something butterfly the paige then it butterfly the mathilde. If the mathilde is agrarian then the mathilde golf the yves. If something butterfly the paige and it is agrarian then the paige butterfly the mathilde. Cold things are leering. If something execrate the mathilde then the mathilde is forceful. If something execrate the yves and the yves execrate the mathilde then the yves execrate the elianora. The mathilde execrate the yves.", "logic": "\nButterfly(elianora, mathilde)\nGolf(yves, elianora)\nExecrate(paige, mathilde)\nGolf(mathilde, yves)\nforall x (Butterfly(x, paige) -> Execrate(paige, elianora))\nforall x (Golf(x, yves) and Execrate(x, yves) -> Golf(yves, paige))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, paige) -> Butterfly(x, mathilde))\nAgrarian(mathilde) -> Golf(mathilde, yves)\nforall x (Butterfly(x, paige) and Agrarian(x) -> Butterfly(paige, mathilde))\nforall x (Forceful(x) -> Leering(x))\nforall x (Execrate(x, mathilde) -> Forceful(mathilde))\nforall x (Execrate(x, yves) and Execrate(yves, mathilde) -> Execrate(yves, elianora))\n\nExecrate(mathilde, yves)\n\nExecrate(mathilde, yves) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1701"} {"premises": "The cybill is mixed. The cybill squint the myron. The myron glisten the marcella. The myron is likely. The myron is mixed. The marcella glisten the myron. The marcella is mixed. The marcella is stative. The standford glisten the marcella. The standford is not mixed. The standford squint the cybill. The standford squint the myron. If someone is surrogate then they chase the cybill. If someone squint the cybill then they visit the marcella. If the myron is palatable and the cybill does not visit the myron then the cybill squint the standford. If someone tack the myron and they do not need the cybill then the myron is stative. If someone squint the marcella then the marcella tack the standford. If someone is stative and they do not visit the marcella then the marcella glisten the myron. The cybill squint the myron.", "logic": "\nMixed(cybill)\nSquint(cybill, myron)\nGlisten(myron, marcella)\nLikely(myron)\nMixed(myron)\nGlisten(marcella, myron)\nMixed(marcella)\nStative(marcella)\nGlisten(standford, marcella)\nnot Mixed(standford)\nSquint(standford, cybill)\nSquint(standford, myron)\nforall x (Surrogate(x) -> Glisten(x, cybill))\nforall x (Squint(x, cybill) -> Squint(x, marcella))\nPalatable(myron) and not Squint(cybill, myron) -> Squint(cybill, standford)\nforall x (Tack(x, myron) and not Tack(x, cybill) -> Stative(myron))\nforall x (Squint(x, marcella) -> Tack(marcella, standford))\nforall x (Stative(x) and not Squint(x, marcella) -> Glisten(marcella, myron))\n\nSquint(cybill, myron)\n\ntherefore Squint(cybill, myron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The valida is northerly. The valida goldbrick the johanna. The johanna arrest the amelina. The johanna is porticoed. The johanna is northerly. The amelina arrest the johanna. The amelina is northerly. The amelina is autologous. The ilyssa arrest the amelina. The ilyssa is not northerly. The ilyssa goldbrick the valida. The ilyssa goldbrick the johanna. If someone is pinioned then they chase the valida. If someone goldbrick the valida then they visit the amelina. If the johanna is reflective and the valida does not visit the johanna then the valida goldbrick the ilyssa. If someone spurt the johanna and they do not need the valida then the johanna is autologous. If someone goldbrick the amelina then the amelina spurt the ilyssa. If someone is autologous and they do not visit the amelina then the amelina arrest the johanna. The johanna is not northerly.", "logic": "\nNortherly(valida)\nGoldbrick(valida, johanna)\nArrest(johanna, amelina)\nPorticoed(johanna)\nNortherly(johanna)\nArrest(amelina, johanna)\nNortherly(amelina)\nAutologous(amelina)\nArrest(ilyssa, amelina)\nnot Northerly(ilyssa)\nGoldbrick(ilyssa, valida)\nGoldbrick(ilyssa, johanna)\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Arrest(x, valida))\nforall x (Goldbrick(x, valida) -> Goldbrick(x, amelina))\nReflective(johanna) and not Goldbrick(valida, johanna) -> Goldbrick(valida, ilyssa)\nforall x (Spurt(x, johanna) and not Spurt(x, valida) -> Autologous(johanna))\nforall x (Goldbrick(x, amelina) -> Spurt(amelina, ilyssa))\nforall x (Autologous(x) and not Goldbrick(x, amelina) -> Arrest(amelina, johanna))\n\nnot Northerly(johanna)\n\ntherefore Northerly(johanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The gerhard is unfair. The gerhard ancylose the kare. The kare womanize the alister. The kare is outright. The kare is unfair. The alister womanize the kare. The alister is unfair. The alister is acidic. The elysha womanize the alister. The elysha is not unfair. The elysha ancylose the gerhard. The elysha ancylose the kare. If someone is shona then they chase the gerhard. If someone ancylose the gerhard then they visit the alister. If the kare is visaged and the gerhard does not visit the kare then the gerhard ancylose the elysha. If someone tour the kare and they do not need the gerhard then the kare is acidic. If someone ancylose the alister then the alister tour the elysha. If someone is acidic and they do not visit the alister then the alister womanize the kare. The elysha ancylose the alister.", "logic": "\nUnfair(gerhard)\nAncylose(gerhard, kare)\nWomanize(kare, alister)\nOutright(kare)\nUnfair(kare)\nWomanize(alister, kare)\nUnfair(alister)\nAcidic(alister)\nWomanize(elysha, alister)\nnot Unfair(elysha)\nAncylose(elysha, gerhard)\nAncylose(elysha, kare)\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Womanize(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Ancylose(x, gerhard) -> Ancylose(x, alister))\nVisaged(kare) and not Ancylose(gerhard, kare) -> Ancylose(gerhard, elysha)\nforall x (Tour(x, kare) and not Tour(x, gerhard) -> Acidic(kare))\nforall x (Ancylose(x, alister) -> Tour(alister, elysha))\nforall x (Acidic(x) and not Ancylose(x, alister) -> Womanize(alister, kare))\n\nAncylose(elysha, alister)\n\nAncylose(elysha, gerhard) and forall x (Ancylose(x, gerhard) -> Ancylose(x, alister)) -> therefore Ancylose(elysha, alister)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The bren is gory. The bren fuck the lorenza. The lorenza throttle the elle. The lorenza is dyed. The lorenza is gory. The elle throttle the lorenza. The elle is gory. The elle is unshapen. The ignacius throttle the elle. The ignacius is not gory. The ignacius fuck the bren. The ignacius fuck the lorenza. If someone is undersized then they chase the bren. If someone fuck the bren then they visit the elle. If the lorenza is impromptu and the bren does not visit the lorenza then the bren fuck the ignacius. If someone detick the lorenza and they do not need the bren then the lorenza is unshapen. If someone fuck the elle then the elle detick the ignacius. If someone is unshapen and they do not visit the elle then the elle throttle the lorenza. The ignacius does not visit the elle.", "logic": "\nGory(bren)\nFuck(bren, lorenza)\nThrottle(lorenza, elle)\nDyed(lorenza)\nGory(lorenza)\nThrottle(elle, lorenza)\nGory(elle)\nUnshapen(elle)\nThrottle(ignacius, elle)\nnot Gory(ignacius)\nFuck(ignacius, bren)\nFuck(ignacius, lorenza)\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Throttle(x, bren))\nforall x (Fuck(x, bren) -> Fuck(x, elle))\nImpromptu(lorenza) and not Fuck(bren, lorenza) -> Fuck(bren, ignacius)\nforall x (Detick(x, lorenza) and not Detick(x, bren) -> Unshapen(lorenza))\nforall x (Fuck(x, elle) -> Detick(elle, ignacius))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) and not Fuck(x, elle) -> Throttle(elle, lorenza))\n\nnot Fuck(ignacius, elle)\n\nFuck(ignacius, bren) and forall x (Fuck(x, bren) -> Fuck(x, elle)) -> therefore Fuck(ignacius, elle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The garvin is modernised. The garvin synthesize the standford. The standford delist the clarita. The standford is largish. The standford is modernised. The clarita delist the standford. The clarita is modernised. The clarita is lithic. The ozzie delist the clarita. The ozzie is not modernised. The ozzie synthesize the garvin. The ozzie synthesize the standford. If someone is reassuring then they chase the garvin. If someone synthesize the garvin then they visit the clarita. If the standford is unkind and the garvin does not visit the standford then the garvin synthesize the ozzie. If someone crack the standford and they do not need the garvin then the standford is lithic. If someone synthesize the clarita then the clarita crack the ozzie. If someone is lithic and they do not visit the clarita then the clarita delist the standford. The clarita crack the ozzie.", "logic": "\nModernised(garvin)\nSynthesize(garvin, standford)\nDelist(standford, clarita)\nLargish(standford)\nModernised(standford)\nDelist(clarita, standford)\nModernised(clarita)\nLithic(clarita)\nDelist(ozzie, clarita)\nnot Modernised(ozzie)\nSynthesize(ozzie, garvin)\nSynthesize(ozzie, standford)\nforall x (Reassuring(x) -> Delist(x, garvin))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, garvin) -> Synthesize(x, clarita))\nUnkind(standford) and not Synthesize(garvin, standford) -> Synthesize(garvin, ozzie)\nforall x (Crack(x, standford) and not Crack(x, garvin) -> Lithic(standford))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, clarita) -> Crack(clarita, ozzie))\nforall x (Lithic(x) and not Synthesize(x, clarita) -> Delist(clarita, standford))\n\nCrack(clarita, ozzie)\n\nSynthesize(ozzie, garvin) and forall x (Synthesize(x, garvin) -> Synthesize(x, clarita)) -> therefore Synthesize(ozzie, clarita) Synthesize(ozzie, clarita) and forall x (Synthesize(x, clarita) -> Crack(clarita, ozzie)) -> therefore Crack(clarita, ozzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The becki is alleged. The becki spotlight the sonja. The sonja savor the kalli. The sonja is waxy. The sonja is alleged. The kalli savor the sonja. The kalli is alleged. The kalli is pudgy. The murdoch savor the kalli. The murdoch is not alleged. The murdoch spotlight the becki. The murdoch spotlight the sonja. If someone is ecologic then they chase the becki. If someone spotlight the becki then they visit the kalli. If the sonja is known and the becki does not visit the sonja then the becki spotlight the murdoch. If someone bespot the sonja and they do not need the becki then the sonja is pudgy. If someone spotlight the kalli then the kalli bespot the murdoch. If someone is pudgy and they do not visit the kalli then the kalli savor the sonja. The kalli does not need the murdoch.", "logic": "\nAlleged(becki)\nSpotlight(becki, sonja)\nSavor(sonja, kalli)\nWaxy(sonja)\nAlleged(sonja)\nSavor(kalli, sonja)\nAlleged(kalli)\nPudgy(kalli)\nSavor(murdoch, kalli)\nnot Alleged(murdoch)\nSpotlight(murdoch, becki)\nSpotlight(murdoch, sonja)\nforall x (Ecologic(x) -> Savor(x, becki))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, becki) -> Spotlight(x, kalli))\nKnown(sonja) and not Spotlight(becki, sonja) -> Spotlight(becki, murdoch)\nforall x (Bespot(x, sonja) and not Bespot(x, becki) -> Pudgy(sonja))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, kalli) -> Bespot(kalli, murdoch))\nforall x (Pudgy(x) and not Spotlight(x, kalli) -> Savor(kalli, sonja))\n\nnot Bespot(kalli, murdoch)\n\nSpotlight(murdoch, becki) and forall x (Spotlight(x, becki) -> Spotlight(x, kalli)) -> therefore Spotlight(murdoch, kalli) Spotlight(murdoch, kalli) and forall x (Spotlight(x, kalli) -> Bespot(kalli, murdoch)) -> therefore Bespot(kalli, murdoch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The charlotte is unchecked. The charlotte heal the berta. The berta bolshevize the ingeberg. The berta is gorgeous. The berta is unchecked. The ingeberg bolshevize the berta. The ingeberg is unchecked. The ingeberg is dyspneal. The hermon bolshevize the ingeberg. The hermon is not unchecked. The hermon heal the charlotte. The hermon heal the berta. If someone is ornamental then they chase the charlotte. If someone heal the charlotte then they visit the ingeberg. If the berta is belittling and the charlotte does not visit the berta then the charlotte heal the hermon. If someone refit the berta and they do not need the charlotte then the berta is dyspneal. If someone heal the ingeberg then the ingeberg refit the hermon. If someone is dyspneal and they do not visit the ingeberg then the ingeberg bolshevize the berta. The charlotte does not visit the hermon.", "logic": "\nUnchecked(charlotte)\nHeal(charlotte, berta)\nBolshevize(berta, ingeberg)\nGorgeous(berta)\nUnchecked(berta)\nBolshevize(ingeberg, berta)\nUnchecked(ingeberg)\nDyspneal(ingeberg)\nBolshevize(hermon, ingeberg)\nnot Unchecked(hermon)\nHeal(hermon, charlotte)\nHeal(hermon, berta)\nforall x (Ornamental(x) -> Bolshevize(x, charlotte))\nforall x (Heal(x, charlotte) -> Heal(x, ingeberg))\nBelittling(berta) and not Heal(charlotte, berta) -> Heal(charlotte, hermon)\nforall x (Refit(x, berta) and not Refit(x, charlotte) -> Dyspneal(berta))\nforall x (Heal(x, ingeberg) -> Refit(ingeberg, hermon))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and not Heal(x, ingeberg) -> Bolshevize(ingeberg, berta))\n\nnot Heal(charlotte, hermon)\n\nBelittling(berta) and not Heal(charlotte, berta) -> Heal(charlotte, hermon) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The erinn is seething. The erinn dominate the jamima. The jamima curse the issi. The jamima is placative. The jamima is seething. The issi curse the jamima. The issi is seething. The issi is chimeric. The aubry curse the issi. The aubry is not seething. The aubry dominate the erinn. The aubry dominate the jamima. If someone is reflexed then they chase the erinn. If someone dominate the erinn then they visit the issi. If the jamima is fuscous and the erinn does not visit the jamima then the erinn dominate the aubry. If someone wait the jamima and they do not need the erinn then the jamima is chimeric. If someone dominate the issi then the issi wait the aubry. If someone is chimeric and they do not visit the issi then the issi curse the jamima. The issi dominate the issi.", "logic": "\nSeething(erinn)\nDominate(erinn, jamima)\nCurse(jamima, issi)\nPlacative(jamima)\nSeething(jamima)\nCurse(issi, jamima)\nSeething(issi)\nChimeric(issi)\nCurse(aubry, issi)\nnot Seething(aubry)\nDominate(aubry, erinn)\nDominate(aubry, jamima)\nforall x (Reflexed(x) -> Curse(x, erinn))\nforall x (Dominate(x, erinn) -> Dominate(x, issi))\nFuscous(jamima) and not Dominate(erinn, jamima) -> Dominate(erinn, aubry)\nforall x (Wait(x, jamima) and not Wait(x, erinn) -> Chimeric(jamima))\nforall x (Dominate(x, issi) -> Wait(issi, aubry))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) and not Dominate(x, issi) -> Curse(issi, jamima))\n\nDominate(issi, issi)\n\nforall x (Dominate(x, erinn) -> Dominate(x, issi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The irvine is deductible. The irvine typeset the gerard. The gerard lapidate the merola. The gerard is clonic. The gerard is deductible. The merola lapidate the gerard. The merola is deductible. The merola is tangy. The wallace lapidate the merola. The wallace is not deductible. The wallace typeset the irvine. The wallace typeset the gerard. If someone is sheetlike then they chase the irvine. If someone typeset the irvine then they visit the merola. If the gerard is voluted and the irvine does not visit the gerard then the irvine typeset the wallace. If someone vaunt the gerard and they do not need the irvine then the gerard is tangy. If someone typeset the merola then the merola vaunt the wallace. If someone is tangy and they do not visit the merola then the merola lapidate the gerard. The gerard is not tangy.", "logic": "\nDeductible(irvine)\nTypeset(irvine, gerard)\nLapidate(gerard, merola)\nClonic(gerard)\nDeductible(gerard)\nLapidate(merola, gerard)\nDeductible(merola)\nTangy(merola)\nLapidate(wallace, merola)\nnot Deductible(wallace)\nTypeset(wallace, irvine)\nTypeset(wallace, gerard)\nforall x (Sheetlike(x) -> Lapidate(x, irvine))\nforall x (Typeset(x, irvine) -> Typeset(x, merola))\nVoluted(gerard) and not Typeset(irvine, gerard) -> Typeset(irvine, wallace)\nforall x (Vaunt(x, gerard) and not Vaunt(x, irvine) -> Tangy(gerard))\nforall x (Typeset(x, merola) -> Vaunt(merola, wallace))\nforall x (Tangy(x) and not Typeset(x, merola) -> Lapidate(merola, gerard))\n\nnot Tangy(gerard)\n\nforall x (Vaunt(x, gerard) and not Vaunt(x, irvine) -> Tangy(gerard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The tiffany is enhancive. The tiffany barricado the dasha. The dasha chance the gladis. The dasha is sibylline. The dasha is enhancive. The gladis chance the dasha. The gladis is enhancive. The gladis is ternate. The marleen chance the gladis. The marleen is not enhancive. The marleen barricado the tiffany. The marleen barricado the dasha. If someone is pathless then they chase the tiffany. If someone barricado the tiffany then they visit the gladis. If the dasha is phantasmal and the tiffany does not visit the dasha then the tiffany barricado the marleen. If someone lengthen the dasha and they do not need the tiffany then the dasha is ternate. If someone barricado the gladis then the gladis lengthen the marleen. If someone is ternate and they do not visit the gladis then the gladis chance the dasha. The dasha barricado the marleen.", "logic": "\nEnhancive(tiffany)\nBarricado(tiffany, dasha)\nChance(dasha, gladis)\nSibylline(dasha)\nEnhancive(dasha)\nChance(gladis, dasha)\nEnhancive(gladis)\nTernate(gladis)\nChance(marleen, gladis)\nnot Enhancive(marleen)\nBarricado(marleen, tiffany)\nBarricado(marleen, dasha)\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> Chance(x, tiffany))\nforall x (Barricado(x, tiffany) -> Barricado(x, gladis))\nPhantasmal(dasha) and not Barricado(tiffany, dasha) -> Barricado(tiffany, marleen)\nforall x (Lengthen(x, dasha) and not Lengthen(x, tiffany) -> Ternate(dasha))\nforall x (Barricado(x, gladis) -> Lengthen(gladis, marleen))\nforall x (Ternate(x) and not Barricado(x, gladis) -> Chance(gladis, dasha))\n\nBarricado(dasha, marleen)\n\nBarricado(dasha, marleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The avi is celebrated. The avi tweet the dian. The dian uncross the jeraldine. The dian is shingly. The dian is celebrated. The jeraldine uncross the dian. The jeraldine is celebrated. The jeraldine is undreamt. The persis uncross the jeraldine. The persis is not celebrated. The persis tweet the avi. The persis tweet the dian. If someone is exegetic then they chase the avi. If someone tweet the avi then they visit the jeraldine. If the dian is inexpiable and the avi does not visit the dian then the avi tweet the persis. If someone sink the dian and they do not need the avi then the dian is undreamt. If someone tweet the jeraldine then the jeraldine sink the persis. If someone is undreamt and they do not visit the jeraldine then the jeraldine uncross the dian. The jeraldine does not need the dian.", "logic": "\nCelebrated(avi)\nTweet(avi, dian)\nUncross(dian, jeraldine)\nShingly(dian)\nCelebrated(dian)\nUncross(jeraldine, dian)\nCelebrated(jeraldine)\nUndreamt(jeraldine)\nUncross(persis, jeraldine)\nnot Celebrated(persis)\nTweet(persis, avi)\nTweet(persis, dian)\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Uncross(x, avi))\nforall x (Tweet(x, avi) -> Tweet(x, jeraldine))\nInexpiable(dian) and not Tweet(avi, dian) -> Tweet(avi, persis)\nforall x (Sink(x, dian) and not Sink(x, avi) -> Undreamt(dian))\nforall x (Tweet(x, jeraldine) -> Sink(jeraldine, persis))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) and not Tweet(x, jeraldine) -> Uncross(jeraldine, dian))\n\nnot Sink(jeraldine, dian)\n\nnot Sink(jeraldine, dian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The janith is matronly. The janith sense the sibel. The sibel strangle the corbin. The sibel is marmorean. The sibel is matronly. The corbin strangle the sibel. The corbin is matronly. The corbin is sacerdotal. The kristina strangle the corbin. The kristina is not matronly. The kristina sense the janith. The kristina sense the sibel. If someone is upcurved then they chase the janith. If someone sense the janith then they visit the corbin. If the sibel is atonic and the janith does not visit the sibel then the janith sense the kristina. If someone muddle the sibel and they do not need the janith then the sibel is sacerdotal. If someone sense the corbin then the corbin muddle the kristina. If someone is sacerdotal and they do not visit the corbin then the corbin strangle the sibel. The corbin sense the janith.", "logic": "\nMatronly(janith)\nSense(janith, sibel)\nStrangle(sibel, corbin)\nMarmorean(sibel)\nMatronly(sibel)\nStrangle(corbin, sibel)\nMatronly(corbin)\nSacerdotal(corbin)\nStrangle(kristina, corbin)\nnot Matronly(kristina)\nSense(kristina, janith)\nSense(kristina, sibel)\nforall x (Upcurved(x) -> Strangle(x, janith))\nforall x (Sense(x, janith) -> Sense(x, corbin))\nAtonic(sibel) and not Sense(janith, sibel) -> Sense(janith, kristina)\nforall x (Muddle(x, sibel) and not Muddle(x, janith) -> Sacerdotal(sibel))\nforall x (Sense(x, corbin) -> Muddle(corbin, kristina))\nforall x (Sacerdotal(x) and not Sense(x, corbin) -> Strangle(corbin, sibel))\n\nSense(corbin, janith)\n\nSense(corbin, janith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1711"} {"premises": "The carly vitrify the marit. The carly vitrify the liz. The marit is sophomore. The marit is viviparous. The marit metricate the carly. The marit metricate the liz. The marit vitrify the liz. The liz disappoint the annice. The liz is sophomore. The liz is relational. The liz is toothlike. The liz vitrify the carly. The liz vitrify the marit. The annice disappoint the liz. The annice is tractable. If something vitrify the annice and the annice metricate the carly then it vitrify the marit. If something disappoint the annice and it vitrify the carly then the annice is viviparous. If something disappoint the marit and it vitrify the annice then the annice disappoint the liz. If something vitrify the marit then it metricate the carly. If something vitrify the annice then the annice vitrify the carly. If something disappoint the liz then it vitrify the annice. If something vitrify the marit then it is toothlike. If something vitrify the annice and the annice vitrify the marit then the annice disappoint the carly. The annice disappoint the liz.", "logic": "\nVitrify(carly, marit)\nVitrify(carly, liz)\nSophomore(marit)\nViviparous(marit)\nMetricate(marit, carly)\nMetricate(marit, liz)\nVitrify(marit, liz)\nDisappoint(liz, annice)\nSophomore(liz)\nRelational(liz)\nToothlike(liz)\nVitrify(liz, carly)\nVitrify(liz, marit)\nDisappoint(annice, liz)\nTractable(annice)\nforall x (Vitrify(x, annice) and Metricate(annice, carly) -> Vitrify(x, marit))\nforall x (Disappoint(x, annice) and Vitrify(x, carly) -> Viviparous(annice))\nforall x (Disappoint(x, marit) and Vitrify(x, annice) -> Disappoint(annice, liz))\nforall x (Vitrify(x, marit) -> Metricate(x, carly))\nforall x (Vitrify(x, annice) -> Vitrify(annice, carly))\nforall x (Disappoint(x, liz) -> Vitrify(x, annice))\nforall x (Vitrify(x, marit) -> Toothlike(x))\nforall x (Vitrify(x, annice) and Vitrify(annice, marit) -> Disappoint(annice, carly))\n\nDisappoint(annice, liz)\n\ntherefore Disappoint(annice, liz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The electra shiver the rice. The electra shiver the benjamin. The rice is southern. The rice is molecular. The rice cuddle the electra. The rice cuddle the benjamin. The rice shiver the benjamin. The benjamin clabber the tiphany. The benjamin is southern. The benjamin is abroach. The benjamin is silvern. The benjamin shiver the electra. The benjamin shiver the rice. The tiphany clabber the benjamin. The tiphany is doleful. If something shiver the tiphany and the tiphany cuddle the electra then it shiver the rice. If something clabber the tiphany and it shiver the electra then the tiphany is molecular. If something clabber the rice and it shiver the tiphany then the tiphany clabber the benjamin. If something shiver the rice then it cuddle the electra. If something shiver the tiphany then the tiphany shiver the electra. If something clabber the benjamin then it shiver the tiphany. If something shiver the rice then it is silvern. If something shiver the tiphany and the tiphany shiver the rice then the tiphany clabber the electra. The benjamin is not southern.", "logic": "\nShiver(electra, rice)\nShiver(electra, benjamin)\nSouthern(rice)\nMolecular(rice)\nCuddle(rice, electra)\nCuddle(rice, benjamin)\nShiver(rice, benjamin)\nClabber(benjamin, tiphany)\nSouthern(benjamin)\nAbroach(benjamin)\nSilvern(benjamin)\nShiver(benjamin, electra)\nShiver(benjamin, rice)\nClabber(tiphany, benjamin)\nDoleful(tiphany)\nforall x (Shiver(x, tiphany) and Cuddle(tiphany, electra) -> Shiver(x, rice))\nforall x (Clabber(x, tiphany) and Shiver(x, electra) -> Molecular(tiphany))\nforall x (Clabber(x, rice) and Shiver(x, tiphany) -> Clabber(tiphany, benjamin))\nforall x (Shiver(x, rice) -> Cuddle(x, electra))\nforall x (Shiver(x, tiphany) -> Shiver(tiphany, electra))\nforall x (Clabber(x, benjamin) -> Shiver(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Shiver(x, rice) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Shiver(x, tiphany) and Shiver(tiphany, rice) -> Clabber(tiphany, electra))\n\nnot Southern(benjamin)\n\ntherefore Southern(benjamin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The orelle unhinge the eleanore. The orelle unhinge the chaddie. The eleanore is incurable. The eleanore is mercuric. The eleanore sound the orelle. The eleanore sound the chaddie. The eleanore unhinge the chaddie. The chaddie ease the bianca. The chaddie is incurable. The chaddie is stale. The chaddie is maledict. The chaddie unhinge the orelle. The chaddie unhinge the eleanore. The bianca ease the chaddie. The bianca is abroad. If something unhinge the bianca and the bianca sound the orelle then it unhinge the eleanore. If something ease the bianca and it unhinge the orelle then the bianca is mercuric. If something ease the eleanore and it unhinge the bianca then the bianca ease the chaddie. If something unhinge the eleanore then it sound the orelle. If something unhinge the bianca then the bianca unhinge the orelle. If something ease the chaddie then it unhinge the bianca. If something unhinge the eleanore then it is maledict. If something unhinge the bianca and the bianca unhinge the eleanore then the bianca ease the orelle. The bianca unhinge the bianca.", "logic": "\nUnhinge(orelle, eleanore)\nUnhinge(orelle, chaddie)\nIncurable(eleanore)\nMercuric(eleanore)\nSound(eleanore, orelle)\nSound(eleanore, chaddie)\nUnhinge(eleanore, chaddie)\nEase(chaddie, bianca)\nIncurable(chaddie)\nStale(chaddie)\nMaledict(chaddie)\nUnhinge(chaddie, orelle)\nUnhinge(chaddie, eleanore)\nEase(bianca, chaddie)\nAbroad(bianca)\nforall x (Unhinge(x, bianca) and Sound(bianca, orelle) -> Unhinge(x, eleanore))\nforall x (Ease(x, bianca) and Unhinge(x, orelle) -> Mercuric(bianca))\nforall x (Ease(x, eleanore) and Unhinge(x, bianca) -> Ease(bianca, chaddie))\nforall x (Unhinge(x, eleanore) -> Sound(x, orelle))\nforall x (Unhinge(x, bianca) -> Unhinge(bianca, orelle))\nforall x (Ease(x, chaddie) -> Unhinge(x, bianca))\nforall x (Unhinge(x, eleanore) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Unhinge(x, bianca) and Unhinge(bianca, eleanore) -> Ease(bianca, orelle))\n\nUnhinge(bianca, bianca)\n\nEase(bianca, chaddie) and forall x (Ease(x, chaddie) -> Unhinge(x, bianca)) -> therefore Unhinge(bianca, bianca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The augie reclassify the gisella. The augie reclassify the mada. The gisella is tantric. The gisella is xcvi. The gisella weed the augie. The gisella weed the mada. The gisella reclassify the mada. The mada tire the mag. The mada is tantric. The mada is carbonyl. The mada is intriguing. The mada reclassify the augie. The mada reclassify the gisella. The mag tire the mada. The mag is napoleonic. If something reclassify the mag and the mag weed the augie then it reclassify the gisella. If something tire the mag and it reclassify the augie then the mag is xcvi. If something tire the gisella and it reclassify the mag then the mag tire the mada. If something reclassify the gisella then it weed the augie. If something reclassify the mag then the mag reclassify the augie. If something tire the mada then it reclassify the mag. If something reclassify the gisella then it is intriguing. If something reclassify the mag and the mag reclassify the gisella then the mag tire the augie. The mada does not see the augie.", "logic": "\nReclassify(augie, gisella)\nReclassify(augie, mada)\nTantric(gisella)\nXcvi(gisella)\nWeed(gisella, augie)\nWeed(gisella, mada)\nReclassify(gisella, mada)\nTire(mada, mag)\nTantric(mada)\nCarbonyl(mada)\nIntriguing(mada)\nReclassify(mada, augie)\nReclassify(mada, gisella)\nTire(mag, mada)\nNapoleonic(mag)\nforall x (Reclassify(x, mag) and Weed(mag, augie) -> Reclassify(x, gisella))\nforall x (Tire(x, mag) and Reclassify(x, augie) -> Xcvi(mag))\nforall x (Tire(x, gisella) and Reclassify(x, mag) -> Tire(mag, mada))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, gisella) -> Weed(x, augie))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, mag) -> Reclassify(mag, augie))\nforall x (Tire(x, mada) -> Reclassify(x, mag))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, gisella) -> Intriguing(x))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, mag) and Reclassify(mag, gisella) -> Tire(mag, augie))\n\nnot Weed(mada, augie)\n\nReclassify(mada, gisella) and forall x (Reclassify(x, gisella) -> Weed(x, augie)) -> therefore Weed(mada, augie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The angy doss the dionis. The angy doss the lauretta. The dionis is sticky. The dionis is sopranino. The dionis swank the angy. The dionis swank the lauretta. The dionis doss the lauretta. The lauretta wield the silvana. The lauretta is sticky. The lauretta is dictated. The lauretta is studied. The lauretta doss the angy. The lauretta doss the dionis. The silvana wield the lauretta. The silvana is ungenerous. If something doss the silvana and the silvana swank the angy then it doss the dionis. If something wield the silvana and it doss the angy then the silvana is sopranino. If something wield the dionis and it doss the silvana then the silvana wield the lauretta. If something doss the dionis then it swank the angy. If something doss the silvana then the silvana doss the angy. If something wield the lauretta then it doss the silvana. If something doss the dionis then it is studied. If something doss the silvana and the silvana doss the dionis then the silvana wield the angy. The silvana doss the angy.", "logic": "\nDoss(angy, dionis)\nDoss(angy, lauretta)\nSticky(dionis)\nSopranino(dionis)\nSwank(dionis, angy)\nSwank(dionis, lauretta)\nDoss(dionis, lauretta)\nWield(lauretta, silvana)\nSticky(lauretta)\nDictated(lauretta)\nStudied(lauretta)\nDoss(lauretta, angy)\nDoss(lauretta, dionis)\nWield(silvana, lauretta)\nUngenerous(silvana)\nforall x (Doss(x, silvana) and Swank(silvana, angy) -> Doss(x, dionis))\nforall x (Wield(x, silvana) and Doss(x, angy) -> Sopranino(silvana))\nforall x (Wield(x, dionis) and Doss(x, silvana) -> Wield(silvana, lauretta))\nforall x (Doss(x, dionis) -> Swank(x, angy))\nforall x (Doss(x, silvana) -> Doss(silvana, angy))\nforall x (Wield(x, lauretta) -> Doss(x, silvana))\nforall x (Doss(x, dionis) -> Studied(x))\nforall x (Doss(x, silvana) and Doss(silvana, dionis) -> Wield(silvana, angy))\n\nDoss(silvana, angy)\n\nWield(silvana, lauretta) and forall x (Wield(x, lauretta) -> Doss(x, silvana)) -> therefore Doss(silvana, silvana) Doss(silvana, silvana) and forall x (Doss(x, silvana) -> Doss(silvana, angy)) -> therefore Doss(silvana, angy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The shem feint the adelina. The shem feint the ivory. The adelina is unemphatic. The adelina is webby. The adelina assess the shem. The adelina assess the ivory. The adelina feint the ivory. The ivory harken the elihu. The ivory is unemphatic. The ivory is hatless. The ivory is costumed. The ivory feint the shem. The ivory feint the adelina. The elihu harken the ivory. The elihu is seaborne. If something feint the elihu and the elihu assess the shem then it feint the adelina. If something harken the elihu and it feint the shem then the elihu is webby. If something harken the adelina and it feint the elihu then the elihu harken the ivory. If something feint the adelina then it assess the shem. If something feint the elihu then the elihu feint the shem. If something harken the ivory then it feint the elihu. If something feint the adelina then it is costumed. If something feint the elihu and the elihu feint the adelina then the elihu harken the shem. The elihu does not visit the shem.", "logic": "\nFeint(shem, adelina)\nFeint(shem, ivory)\nUnemphatic(adelina)\nWebby(adelina)\nAssess(adelina, shem)\nAssess(adelina, ivory)\nFeint(adelina, ivory)\nHarken(ivory, elihu)\nUnemphatic(ivory)\nHatless(ivory)\nCostumed(ivory)\nFeint(ivory, shem)\nFeint(ivory, adelina)\nHarken(elihu, ivory)\nSeaborne(elihu)\nforall x (Feint(x, elihu) and Assess(elihu, shem) -> Feint(x, adelina))\nforall x (Harken(x, elihu) and Feint(x, shem) -> Webby(elihu))\nforall x (Harken(x, adelina) and Feint(x, elihu) -> Harken(elihu, ivory))\nforall x (Feint(x, adelina) -> Assess(x, shem))\nforall x (Feint(x, elihu) -> Feint(elihu, shem))\nforall x (Harken(x, ivory) -> Feint(x, elihu))\nforall x (Feint(x, adelina) -> Costumed(x))\nforall x (Feint(x, elihu) and Feint(elihu, adelina) -> Harken(elihu, shem))\n\nnot Feint(elihu, shem)\n\nHarken(elihu, ivory) and forall x (Harken(x, ivory) -> Feint(x, elihu)) -> therefore Feint(elihu, elihu) Feint(elihu, elihu) and forall x (Feint(x, elihu) -> Feint(elihu, shem)) -> therefore Feint(elihu, shem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The tabbatha ammonify the hulda. The tabbatha ammonify the pris. The hulda is judicious. The hulda is oratorical. The hulda ozonize the tabbatha. The hulda ozonize the pris. The hulda ammonify the pris. The pris stopple the emmey. The pris is judicious. The pris is obviating. The pris is barbarian. The pris ammonify the tabbatha. The pris ammonify the hulda. The emmey stopple the pris. The emmey is ruby. If something ammonify the emmey and the emmey ozonize the tabbatha then it ammonify the hulda. If something stopple the emmey and it ammonify the tabbatha then the emmey is oratorical. If something stopple the hulda and it ammonify the emmey then the emmey stopple the pris. If something ammonify the hulda then it ozonize the tabbatha. If something ammonify the emmey then the emmey ammonify the tabbatha. If something stopple the pris then it ammonify the emmey. If something ammonify the hulda then it is barbarian. If something ammonify the emmey and the emmey ammonify the hulda then the emmey stopple the tabbatha. The hulda is not barbarian.", "logic": "\nAmmonify(tabbatha, hulda)\nAmmonify(tabbatha, pris)\nJudicious(hulda)\nOratorical(hulda)\nOzonize(hulda, tabbatha)\nOzonize(hulda, pris)\nAmmonify(hulda, pris)\nStopple(pris, emmey)\nJudicious(pris)\nObviating(pris)\nBarbarian(pris)\nAmmonify(pris, tabbatha)\nAmmonify(pris, hulda)\nStopple(emmey, pris)\nRuby(emmey)\nforall x (Ammonify(x, emmey) and Ozonize(emmey, tabbatha) -> Ammonify(x, hulda))\nforall x (Stopple(x, emmey) and Ammonify(x, tabbatha) -> Oratorical(emmey))\nforall x (Stopple(x, hulda) and Ammonify(x, emmey) -> Stopple(emmey, pris))\nforall x (Ammonify(x, hulda) -> Ozonize(x, tabbatha))\nforall x (Ammonify(x, emmey) -> Ammonify(emmey, tabbatha))\nforall x (Stopple(x, pris) -> Ammonify(x, emmey))\nforall x (Ammonify(x, hulda) -> Barbarian(x))\nforall x (Ammonify(x, emmey) and Ammonify(emmey, hulda) -> Stopple(emmey, tabbatha))\n\nnot Barbarian(hulda)\n\nforall x (Ammonify(x, hulda) -> Barbarian(x)) <- forall x (Ammonify(x, emmey) and Ozonize(emmey, tabbatha) -> Ammonify(x, hulda)) <- forall x (Stopple(x, pris) -> Ammonify(x, emmey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The klee exculpate the bethany. The klee exculpate the eric. The bethany is rateable. The bethany is igneous. The bethany discourage the klee. The bethany discourage the eric. The bethany exculpate the eric. The eric thwart the monique. The eric is rateable. The eric is overloaded. The eric is diverting. The eric exculpate the klee. The eric exculpate the bethany. The monique thwart the eric. The monique is blamed. If something exculpate the monique and the monique discourage the klee then it exculpate the bethany. If something thwart the monique and it exculpate the klee then the monique is igneous. If something thwart the bethany and it exculpate the monique then the monique thwart the eric. If something exculpate the bethany then it discourage the klee. If something exculpate the monique then the monique exculpate the klee. If something thwart the eric then it exculpate the monique. If something exculpate the bethany then it is diverting. If something exculpate the monique and the monique exculpate the bethany then the monique thwart the klee. The monique exculpate the bethany.", "logic": "\nExculpate(klee, bethany)\nExculpate(klee, eric)\nRateable(bethany)\nIgneous(bethany)\nDiscourage(bethany, klee)\nDiscourage(bethany, eric)\nExculpate(bethany, eric)\nThwart(eric, monique)\nRateable(eric)\nOverloaded(eric)\nDiverting(eric)\nExculpate(eric, klee)\nExculpate(eric, bethany)\nThwart(monique, eric)\nBlamed(monique)\nforall x (Exculpate(x, monique) and Discourage(monique, klee) -> Exculpate(x, bethany))\nforall x (Thwart(x, monique) and Exculpate(x, klee) -> Igneous(monique))\nforall x (Thwart(x, bethany) and Exculpate(x, monique) -> Thwart(monique, eric))\nforall x (Exculpate(x, bethany) -> Discourage(x, klee))\nforall x (Exculpate(x, monique) -> Exculpate(monique, klee))\nforall x (Thwart(x, eric) -> Exculpate(x, monique))\nforall x (Exculpate(x, bethany) -> Diverting(x))\nforall x (Exculpate(x, monique) and Exculpate(monique, bethany) -> Thwart(monique, klee))\n\nExculpate(monique, bethany)\n\nforall x (Exculpate(x, monique) and Discourage(monique, klee) -> Exculpate(x, bethany)) <- forall x (Exculpate(x, bethany) -> Discourage(x, klee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The brenn succumb the gilburt. The brenn succumb the agretha. The gilburt is faucal. The gilburt is rolling. The gilburt poach the brenn. The gilburt poach the agretha. The gilburt succumb the agretha. The agretha decoy the cheston. The agretha is faucal. The agretha is insulting. The agretha is lustreless. The agretha succumb the brenn. The agretha succumb the gilburt. The cheston decoy the agretha. The cheston is unglazed. If something succumb the cheston and the cheston poach the brenn then it succumb the gilburt. If something decoy the cheston and it succumb the brenn then the cheston is rolling. If something decoy the gilburt and it succumb the cheston then the cheston decoy the agretha. If something succumb the gilburt then it poach the brenn. If something succumb the cheston then the cheston succumb the brenn. If something decoy the agretha then it succumb the cheston. If something succumb the gilburt then it is lustreless. If something succumb the cheston and the cheston succumb the gilburt then the cheston decoy the brenn. The brenn does not visit the cheston.", "logic": "\nSuccumb(brenn, gilburt)\nSuccumb(brenn, agretha)\nFaucal(gilburt)\nRolling(gilburt)\nPoach(gilburt, brenn)\nPoach(gilburt, agretha)\nSuccumb(gilburt, agretha)\nDecoy(agretha, cheston)\nFaucal(agretha)\nInsulting(agretha)\nLustreless(agretha)\nSuccumb(agretha, brenn)\nSuccumb(agretha, gilburt)\nDecoy(cheston, agretha)\nUnglazed(cheston)\nforall x (Succumb(x, cheston) and Poach(cheston, brenn) -> Succumb(x, gilburt))\nforall x (Decoy(x, cheston) and Succumb(x, brenn) -> Rolling(cheston))\nforall x (Decoy(x, gilburt) and Succumb(x, cheston) -> Decoy(cheston, agretha))\nforall x (Succumb(x, gilburt) -> Poach(x, brenn))\nforall x (Succumb(x, cheston) -> Succumb(cheston, brenn))\nforall x (Decoy(x, agretha) -> Succumb(x, cheston))\nforall x (Succumb(x, gilburt) -> Lustreless(x))\nforall x (Succumb(x, cheston) and Succumb(cheston, gilburt) -> Decoy(cheston, brenn))\n\nnot Succumb(brenn, cheston)\n\nforall x (Decoy(x, agretha) -> Succumb(x, cheston)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The carla dong the steve. The carla dong the anatole. The steve is glorified. The steve is extempore. The steve visit the carla. The steve visit the anatole. The steve dong the anatole. The anatole crosscut the nerte. The anatole is glorified. The anatole is indexless. The anatole is working. The anatole dong the carla. The anatole dong the steve. The nerte crosscut the anatole. The nerte is crooked. If something dong the nerte and the nerte visit the carla then it dong the steve. If something crosscut the nerte and it dong the carla then the nerte is extempore. If something crosscut the steve and it dong the nerte then the nerte crosscut the anatole. If something dong the steve then it visit the carla. If something dong the nerte then the nerte dong the carla. If something crosscut the anatole then it dong the nerte. If something dong the steve then it is working. If something dong the nerte and the nerte dong the steve then the nerte crosscut the carla. The steve crosscut the anatole.", "logic": "\nDong(carla, steve)\nDong(carla, anatole)\nGlorified(steve)\nExtempore(steve)\nVisit(steve, carla)\nVisit(steve, anatole)\nDong(steve, anatole)\nCrosscut(anatole, nerte)\nGlorified(anatole)\nIndexless(anatole)\nWorking(anatole)\nDong(anatole, carla)\nDong(anatole, steve)\nCrosscut(nerte, anatole)\nCrooked(nerte)\nforall x (Dong(x, nerte) and Visit(nerte, carla) -> Dong(x, steve))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, nerte) and Dong(x, carla) -> Extempore(nerte))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, steve) and Dong(x, nerte) -> Crosscut(nerte, anatole))\nforall x (Dong(x, steve) -> Visit(x, carla))\nforall x (Dong(x, nerte) -> Dong(nerte, carla))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, anatole) -> Dong(x, nerte))\nforall x (Dong(x, steve) -> Working(x))\nforall x (Dong(x, nerte) and Dong(nerte, steve) -> Crosscut(nerte, carla))\n\nCrosscut(steve, anatole)\n\nCrosscut(steve, anatole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The rani ensky the hamilton. The rani ensky the lisabeth. The hamilton is septuple. The hamilton is stern. The hamilton deliquesce the rani. The hamilton deliquesce the lisabeth. The hamilton ensky the lisabeth. The lisabeth adulterate the carry. The lisabeth is septuple. The lisabeth is propelling. The lisabeth is anabolic. The lisabeth ensky the rani. The lisabeth ensky the hamilton. The carry adulterate the lisabeth. The carry is corvine. If something ensky the carry and the carry deliquesce the rani then it ensky the hamilton. If something adulterate the carry and it ensky the rani then the carry is stern. If something adulterate the hamilton and it ensky the carry then the carry adulterate the lisabeth. If something ensky the hamilton then it deliquesce the rani. If something ensky the carry then the carry ensky the rani. If something adulterate the lisabeth then it ensky the carry. If something ensky the hamilton then it is anabolic. If something ensky the carry and the carry ensky the hamilton then the carry adulterate the rani. The rani does not visit the rani.", "logic": "\nEnsky(rani, hamilton)\nEnsky(rani, lisabeth)\nSeptuple(hamilton)\nStern(hamilton)\nDeliquesce(hamilton, rani)\nDeliquesce(hamilton, lisabeth)\nEnsky(hamilton, lisabeth)\nAdulterate(lisabeth, carry)\nSeptuple(lisabeth)\nPropelling(lisabeth)\nAnabolic(lisabeth)\nEnsky(lisabeth, rani)\nEnsky(lisabeth, hamilton)\nAdulterate(carry, lisabeth)\nCorvine(carry)\nforall x (Ensky(x, carry) and Deliquesce(carry, rani) -> Ensky(x, hamilton))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, carry) and Ensky(x, rani) -> Stern(carry))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, hamilton) and Ensky(x, carry) -> Adulterate(carry, lisabeth))\nforall x (Ensky(x, hamilton) -> Deliquesce(x, rani))\nforall x (Ensky(x, carry) -> Ensky(carry, rani))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, lisabeth) -> Ensky(x, carry))\nforall x (Ensky(x, hamilton) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Ensky(x, carry) and Ensky(carry, hamilton) -> Adulterate(carry, rani))\n\nnot Ensky(rani, rani)\n\nnot Ensky(rani, rani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The dorette chuff the estel. The dorette chuff the rodrick. The estel is semiopaque. The estel is humourous. The estel rubric the dorette. The estel rubric the rodrick. The estel chuff the rodrick. The rodrick stain the hilde. The rodrick is semiopaque. The rodrick is adolescent. The rodrick is boracic. The rodrick chuff the dorette. The rodrick chuff the estel. The hilde stain the rodrick. The hilde is pillaged. If something chuff the hilde and the hilde rubric the dorette then it chuff the estel. If something stain the hilde and it chuff the dorette then the hilde is humourous. If something stain the estel and it chuff the hilde then the hilde stain the rodrick. If something chuff the estel then it rubric the dorette. If something chuff the hilde then the hilde chuff the dorette. If something stain the rodrick then it chuff the hilde. If something chuff the estel then it is boracic. If something chuff the hilde and the hilde chuff the estel then the hilde stain the dorette. The estel is adolescent.", "logic": "\nChuff(dorette, estel)\nChuff(dorette, rodrick)\nSemiopaque(estel)\nHumourous(estel)\nRubric(estel, dorette)\nRubric(estel, rodrick)\nChuff(estel, rodrick)\nStain(rodrick, hilde)\nSemiopaque(rodrick)\nAdolescent(rodrick)\nBoracic(rodrick)\nChuff(rodrick, dorette)\nChuff(rodrick, estel)\nStain(hilde, rodrick)\nPillaged(hilde)\nforall x (Chuff(x, hilde) and Rubric(hilde, dorette) -> Chuff(x, estel))\nforall x (Stain(x, hilde) and Chuff(x, dorette) -> Humourous(hilde))\nforall x (Stain(x, estel) and Chuff(x, hilde) -> Stain(hilde, rodrick))\nforall x (Chuff(x, estel) -> Rubric(x, dorette))\nforall x (Chuff(x, hilde) -> Chuff(hilde, dorette))\nforall x (Stain(x, rodrick) -> Chuff(x, hilde))\nforall x (Chuff(x, estel) -> Boracic(x))\nforall x (Chuff(x, hilde) and Chuff(hilde, estel) -> Stain(hilde, dorette))\n\nAdolescent(estel)\n\nAdolescent(estel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The noami plaster the angy. The teressa whirr the angy. The angy whirr the noami. If something whirr the noami then it plaster the angy. If the noami plaster the angy then the angy is blotched. If something whirr the noami and it is blotched then it warrant the teressa. If something is blotched then it whirr the noami. If something warrant the teressa then it plaster the teressa. If something whirr the angy and the angy is settled then the angy whirr the noami. If something is blotched then it whirr the teressa. If something is blotched then it whirr the noami. The teressa whirr the angy.", "logic": "\nPlaster(noami, angy)\nWhirr(teressa, angy)\nWhirr(angy, noami)\nforall x (Whirr(x, noami) -> Plaster(x, angy))\nPlaster(noami, angy) -> Blotched(angy)\nforall x (Whirr(x, noami) and Blotched(x) -> Warrant(x, teressa))\nforall x (Blotched(x) -> Whirr(x, noami))\nforall x (Warrant(x, teressa) -> Plaster(x, teressa))\nforall x (Whirr(x, angy) and Settled(angy) -> Whirr(angy, noami))\nforall x (Blotched(x) -> Whirr(x, teressa))\nforall x (Blotched(x) -> Whirr(x, noami))\n\nWhirr(teressa, angy)\n\ntherefore Whirr(teressa, angy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The dody embrittle the ezechiel. The thurston dance the ezechiel. The ezechiel dance the dody. If something dance the dody then it embrittle the ezechiel. If the dody embrittle the ezechiel then the ezechiel is shamefaced. If something dance the dody and it is shamefaced then it bush the thurston. If something is shamefaced then it dance the dody. If something bush the thurston then it embrittle the thurston. If something dance the ezechiel and the ezechiel is lineal then the ezechiel dance the dody. If something is shamefaced then it dance the thurston. If something is shamefaced then it dance the dody. The dody does not see the ezechiel.", "logic": "\nEmbrittle(dody, ezechiel)\nDance(thurston, ezechiel)\nDance(ezechiel, dody)\nforall x (Dance(x, dody) -> Embrittle(x, ezechiel))\nEmbrittle(dody, ezechiel) -> Shamefaced(ezechiel)\nforall x (Dance(x, dody) and Shamefaced(x) -> Bush(x, thurston))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) -> Dance(x, dody))\nforall x (Bush(x, thurston) -> Embrittle(x, thurston))\nforall x (Dance(x, ezechiel) and Lineal(ezechiel) -> Dance(ezechiel, dody))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) -> Dance(x, thurston))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) -> Dance(x, dody))\n\nnot Embrittle(dody, ezechiel)\n\ntherefore Embrittle(dody, ezechiel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The florence reshape the louisette. The alexis bluster the louisette. The louisette bluster the florence. If something bluster the florence then it reshape the louisette. If the florence reshape the louisette then the louisette is satiate. If something bluster the florence and it is satiate then it fortify the alexis. If something is satiate then it bluster the florence. If something fortify the alexis then it reshape the alexis. If something bluster the louisette and the louisette is tensed then the louisette bluster the florence. If something is satiate then it bluster the alexis. If something is satiate then it bluster the florence. The louisette reshape the louisette.", "logic": "\nReshape(florence, louisette)\nBluster(alexis, louisette)\nBluster(louisette, florence)\nforall x (Bluster(x, florence) -> Reshape(x, louisette))\nReshape(florence, louisette) -> Satiate(louisette)\nforall x (Bluster(x, florence) and Satiate(x) -> Fortify(x, alexis))\nforall x (Satiate(x) -> Bluster(x, florence))\nforall x (Fortify(x, alexis) -> Reshape(x, alexis))\nforall x (Bluster(x, louisette) and Tensed(louisette) -> Bluster(louisette, florence))\nforall x (Satiate(x) -> Bluster(x, alexis))\nforall x (Satiate(x) -> Bluster(x, florence))\n\nReshape(louisette, louisette)\n\nBluster(louisette, florence) and forall x (Bluster(x, florence) -> Reshape(x, louisette)) -> therefore Reshape(louisette, louisette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The almeria dish the rubina. The margaux fondle the rubina. The rubina fondle the almeria. If something fondle the almeria then it dish the rubina. If the almeria dish the rubina then the rubina is blackish. If something fondle the almeria and it is blackish then it distance the margaux. If something is blackish then it fondle the almeria. If something distance the margaux then it dish the margaux. If something fondle the rubina and the rubina is spanking then the rubina fondle the almeria. If something is blackish then it fondle the margaux. If something is blackish then it fondle the almeria. The rubina is not blackish.", "logic": "\nDish(almeria, rubina)\nFondle(margaux, rubina)\nFondle(rubina, almeria)\nforall x (Fondle(x, almeria) -> Dish(x, rubina))\nDish(almeria, rubina) -> Blackish(rubina)\nforall x (Fondle(x, almeria) and Blackish(x) -> Distance(x, margaux))\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Fondle(x, almeria))\nforall x (Distance(x, margaux) -> Dish(x, margaux))\nforall x (Fondle(x, rubina) and Spanking(rubina) -> Fondle(rubina, almeria))\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Fondle(x, margaux))\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Fondle(x, almeria))\n\nnot Blackish(rubina)\n\nDish(almeria, rubina) and Dish(almeria, rubina) -> Blackish(rubina) -> therefore Blackish(rubina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The enrique lyric the erik. The filip ablate the erik. The erik ablate the enrique. If something ablate the enrique then it lyric the erik. If the enrique lyric the erik then the erik is lentic. If something ablate the enrique and it is lentic then it stall the filip. If something is lentic then it ablate the enrique. If something stall the filip then it lyric the filip. If something ablate the erik and the erik is ritzy then the erik ablate the enrique. If something is lentic then it ablate the filip. If something is lentic then it ablate the enrique. The erik ablate the filip.", "logic": "\nLyric(enrique, erik)\nAblate(filip, erik)\nAblate(erik, enrique)\nforall x (Ablate(x, enrique) -> Lyric(x, erik))\nLyric(enrique, erik) -> Lentic(erik)\nforall x (Ablate(x, enrique) and Lentic(x) -> Stall(x, filip))\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Ablate(x, enrique))\nforall x (Stall(x, filip) -> Lyric(x, filip))\nforall x (Ablate(x, erik) and Ritzy(erik) -> Ablate(erik, enrique))\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Ablate(x, filip))\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Ablate(x, enrique))\n\nAblate(erik, filip)\n\nLyric(enrique, erik) and Lyric(enrique, erik) -> Lentic(erik) -> therefore Lentic(erik) Lentic(erik) and forall x (Lentic(x) -> Ablate(x, filip)) -> therefore Ablate(erik, filip)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The kylynn tick the rachael. The dorothee format the rachael. The rachael format the kylynn. If something format the kylynn then it tick the rachael. If the kylynn tick the rachael then the rachael is sauteed. If something format the kylynn and it is sauteed then it shellac the dorothee. If something is sauteed then it format the kylynn. If something shellac the dorothee then it tick the dorothee. If something format the rachael and the rachael is untutored then the rachael format the kylynn. If something is sauteed then it format the dorothee. If something is sauteed then it format the kylynn. The rachael does not eat the dorothee.", "logic": "\nTick(kylynn, rachael)\nFormat(dorothee, rachael)\nFormat(rachael, kylynn)\nforall x (Format(x, kylynn) -> Tick(x, rachael))\nTick(kylynn, rachael) -> Sauteed(rachael)\nforall x (Format(x, kylynn) and Sauteed(x) -> Shellac(x, dorothee))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) -> Format(x, kylynn))\nforall x (Shellac(x, dorothee) -> Tick(x, dorothee))\nforall x (Format(x, rachael) and Untutored(rachael) -> Format(rachael, kylynn))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) -> Format(x, dorothee))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) -> Format(x, kylynn))\n\nnot Format(rachael, dorothee)\n\nTick(kylynn, rachael) and Tick(kylynn, rachael) -> Sauteed(rachael) -> therefore Sauteed(rachael) Sauteed(rachael) and forall x (Sauteed(x) -> Format(x, dorothee)) -> therefore Format(rachael, dorothee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The angil weld the alexina. The granville satirise the alexina. The alexina satirise the angil. If something satirise the angil then it weld the alexina. If the angil weld the alexina then the alexina is ambivalent. If something satirise the angil and it is ambivalent then it discommode the granville. If something is ambivalent then it satirise the angil. If something discommode the granville then it weld the granville. If something satirise the alexina and the alexina is titular then the alexina satirise the angil. If something is ambivalent then it satirise the granville. If something is ambivalent then it satirise the angil. The granville does not see the alexina.", "logic": "\nWeld(angil, alexina)\nSatirise(granville, alexina)\nSatirise(alexina, angil)\nforall x (Satirise(x, angil) -> Weld(x, alexina))\nWeld(angil, alexina) -> Ambivalent(alexina)\nforall x (Satirise(x, angil) and Ambivalent(x) -> Discommode(x, granville))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Satirise(x, angil))\nforall x (Discommode(x, granville) -> Weld(x, granville))\nforall x (Satirise(x, alexina) and Titular(alexina) -> Satirise(alexina, angil))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Satirise(x, granville))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Satirise(x, angil))\n\nnot Weld(granville, alexina)\n\nforall x (Satirise(x, angil) -> Weld(x, alexina)) <- forall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Satirise(x, angil)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The wood strain the aryn. The tremaine plant the aryn. The aryn plant the wood. If something plant the wood then it strain the aryn. If the wood strain the aryn then the aryn is papillose. If something plant the wood and it is papillose then it bunk the tremaine. If something is papillose then it plant the wood. If something bunk the tremaine then it strain the tremaine. If something plant the aryn and the aryn is barren then the aryn plant the wood. If something is papillose then it plant the tremaine. If something is papillose then it plant the wood. The wood plant the tremaine.", "logic": "\nStrain(wood, aryn)\nPlant(tremaine, aryn)\nPlant(aryn, wood)\nforall x (Plant(x, wood) -> Strain(x, aryn))\nStrain(wood, aryn) -> Papillose(aryn)\nforall x (Plant(x, wood) and Papillose(x) -> Bunk(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Plant(x, wood))\nforall x (Bunk(x, tremaine) -> Strain(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Plant(x, aryn) and Barren(aryn) -> Plant(aryn, wood))\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Plant(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Plant(x, wood))\n\nPlant(wood, tremaine)\n\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Plant(x, tremaine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The joshua foreclose the heddie. The mella neighbour the heddie. The heddie neighbour the joshua. If something neighbour the joshua then it foreclose the heddie. If the joshua foreclose the heddie then the heddie is unclaimed. If something neighbour the joshua and it is unclaimed then it aspire the mella. If something is unclaimed then it neighbour the joshua. If something aspire the mella then it foreclose the mella. If something neighbour the heddie and the heddie is cadaverous then the heddie neighbour the joshua. If something is unclaimed then it neighbour the mella. If something is unclaimed then it neighbour the joshua. The mella does not eat the joshua.", "logic": "\nForeclose(joshua, heddie)\nNeighbour(mella, heddie)\nNeighbour(heddie, joshua)\nforall x (Neighbour(x, joshua) -> Foreclose(x, heddie))\nForeclose(joshua, heddie) -> Unclaimed(heddie)\nforall x (Neighbour(x, joshua) and Unclaimed(x) -> Aspire(x, mella))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Neighbour(x, joshua))\nforall x (Aspire(x, mella) -> Foreclose(x, mella))\nforall x (Neighbour(x, heddie) and Cadaverous(heddie) -> Neighbour(heddie, joshua))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Neighbour(x, mella))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Neighbour(x, joshua))\n\nnot Neighbour(mella, joshua)\n\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Neighbour(x, joshua)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The kassandra raid the calypso. The micky whine the calypso. The calypso whine the kassandra. If something whine the kassandra then it raid the calypso. If the kassandra raid the calypso then the calypso is stupefied. If something whine the kassandra and it is stupefied then it retain the micky. If something is stupefied then it whine the kassandra. If something retain the micky then it raid the micky. If something whine the calypso and the calypso is aspiring then the calypso whine the kassandra. If something is stupefied then it whine the micky. If something is stupefied then it whine the kassandra. The calypso raid the kassandra.", "logic": "\nRaid(kassandra, calypso)\nWhine(micky, calypso)\nWhine(calypso, kassandra)\nforall x (Whine(x, kassandra) -> Raid(x, calypso))\nRaid(kassandra, calypso) -> Stupefied(calypso)\nforall x (Whine(x, kassandra) and Stupefied(x) -> Retain(x, micky))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Whine(x, kassandra))\nforall x (Retain(x, micky) -> Raid(x, micky))\nforall x (Whine(x, calypso) and Aspiring(calypso) -> Whine(calypso, kassandra))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Whine(x, micky))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Whine(x, kassandra))\n\nRaid(calypso, kassandra)\n\nRaid(calypso, kassandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The lesley tighten the brady. The claire sail the brady. The brady sail the lesley. If something sail the lesley then it tighten the brady. If the lesley tighten the brady then the brady is sisyphean. If something sail the lesley and it is sisyphean then it fertilise the claire. If something is sisyphean then it sail the lesley. If something fertilise the claire then it tighten the claire. If something sail the brady and the brady is fricative then the brady sail the lesley. If something is sisyphean then it sail the claire. If something is sisyphean then it sail the lesley. The brady does not need the brady.", "logic": "\nTighten(lesley, brady)\nSail(claire, brady)\nSail(brady, lesley)\nforall x (Sail(x, lesley) -> Tighten(x, brady))\nTighten(lesley, brady) -> Sisyphean(brady)\nforall x (Sail(x, lesley) and Sisyphean(x) -> Fertilise(x, claire))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Sail(x, lesley))\nforall x (Fertilise(x, claire) -> Tighten(x, claire))\nforall x (Sail(x, brady) and Fricative(brady) -> Sail(brady, lesley))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Sail(x, claire))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Sail(x, lesley))\n\nnot Fertilise(brady, brady)\n\nnot Fertilise(brady, brady) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The lauraine sideline the kiri. The corny deactivate the kiri. The kiri deactivate the lauraine. If something deactivate the lauraine then it sideline the kiri. If the lauraine sideline the kiri then the kiri is conjugated. If something deactivate the lauraine and it is conjugated then it stake the corny. If something is conjugated then it deactivate the lauraine. If something stake the corny then it sideline the corny. If something deactivate the kiri and the kiri is ponderous then the kiri deactivate the lauraine. If something is conjugated then it deactivate the corny. If something is conjugated then it deactivate the lauraine. The lauraine is ponderous.", "logic": "\nSideline(lauraine, kiri)\nDeactivate(corny, kiri)\nDeactivate(kiri, lauraine)\nforall x (Deactivate(x, lauraine) -> Sideline(x, kiri))\nSideline(lauraine, kiri) -> Conjugated(kiri)\nforall x (Deactivate(x, lauraine) and Conjugated(x) -> Stake(x, corny))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Deactivate(x, lauraine))\nforall x (Stake(x, corny) -> Sideline(x, corny))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, kiri) and Ponderous(kiri) -> Deactivate(kiri, lauraine))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Deactivate(x, corny))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Deactivate(x, lauraine))\n\nPonderous(lauraine)\n\nPonderous(lauraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-70"} {"premises": "The bryn is wizen. The bryn is not brisant. The bryn is momentous. The bryn guarantee the evonne. The bryn capsize the evonne. The bryn waffle the evonne. The evonne is babelike. The evonne is momentous. The evonne guarantee the bryn. The evonne capsize the bryn. If someone is nonnomadic then they visit the bryn. If someone is wizen and they like the evonne then they do not visit the bryn. If someone waffle the bryn then they do not like the evonne. If someone is babelike and not brisant then they like the evonne. If someone capsize the evonne then the evonne waffle the bryn. If someone guarantee the evonne and they see the bryn then the evonne guarantee the bryn. If the evonne capsize the bryn then the bryn is momentous. If someone capsize the bryn and they do not like the bryn then the bryn does not visit the evonne. The bryn is not brisant.", "logic": "\nWizen(bryn)\nnot Brisant(bryn)\nMomentous(bryn)\nGuarantee(bryn, evonne)\nCapsize(bryn, evonne)\nWaffle(bryn, evonne)\nBabelike(evonne)\nMomentous(evonne)\nGuarantee(evonne, bryn)\nCapsize(evonne, bryn)\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Waffle(x, bryn))\nforall x (Wizen(x) and Guarantee(x, evonne) -> not Waffle(x, bryn))\nforall x (Waffle(x, bryn) -> not Guarantee(x, evonne))\nforall x (Babelike(x) and not Brisant(x) -> Guarantee(x, evonne))\nforall x (Capsize(x, evonne) -> Waffle(evonne, bryn))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, evonne) and Capsize(x, bryn) -> Guarantee(evonne, bryn))\nCapsize(evonne, bryn) -> Momentous(bryn)\nforall x (Capsize(x, bryn) and not Guarantee(x, bryn) -> not Waffle(bryn, evonne))\n\nnot Brisant(bryn)\n\ntherefore not Brisant(bryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The mahesh is robust. The mahesh is not beguiled. The mahesh is incredible. The mahesh liaise the rebe. The mahesh redispose the rebe. The mahesh taper the rebe. The rebe is mothproof. The rebe is incredible. The rebe liaise the mahesh. The rebe redispose the mahesh. If someone is ungummed then they visit the mahesh. If someone is robust and they like the rebe then they do not visit the mahesh. If someone taper the mahesh then they do not like the rebe. If someone is mothproof and not beguiled then they like the rebe. If someone redispose the rebe then the rebe taper the mahesh. If someone liaise the rebe and they see the mahesh then the rebe liaise the mahesh. If the rebe redispose the mahesh then the mahesh is incredible. If someone redispose the mahesh and they do not like the mahesh then the mahesh does not visit the rebe. The mahesh is not robust.", "logic": "\nRobust(mahesh)\nnot Beguiled(mahesh)\nIncredible(mahesh)\nLiaise(mahesh, rebe)\nRedispose(mahesh, rebe)\nTaper(mahesh, rebe)\nMothproof(rebe)\nIncredible(rebe)\nLiaise(rebe, mahesh)\nRedispose(rebe, mahesh)\nforall x (Ungummed(x) -> Taper(x, mahesh))\nforall x (Robust(x) and Liaise(x, rebe) -> not Taper(x, mahesh))\nforall x (Taper(x, mahesh) -> not Liaise(x, rebe))\nforall x (Mothproof(x) and not Beguiled(x) -> Liaise(x, rebe))\nforall x (Redispose(x, rebe) -> Taper(rebe, mahesh))\nforall x (Liaise(x, rebe) and Redispose(x, mahesh) -> Liaise(rebe, mahesh))\nRedispose(rebe, mahesh) -> Incredible(mahesh)\nforall x (Redispose(x, mahesh) and not Liaise(x, mahesh) -> not Taper(mahesh, rebe))\n\nnot Robust(mahesh)\n\ntherefore Robust(mahesh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The dannie is petalless. The dannie is not limacoid. The dannie is prime. The dannie caseate the othelia. The dannie sate the othelia. The dannie outfight the othelia. The othelia is jeweled. The othelia is prime. The othelia caseate the dannie. The othelia sate the dannie. If someone is conversant then they visit the dannie. If someone is petalless and they like the othelia then they do not visit the dannie. If someone outfight the dannie then they do not like the othelia. If someone is jeweled and not limacoid then they like the othelia. If someone sate the othelia then the othelia outfight the dannie. If someone caseate the othelia and they see the dannie then the othelia caseate the dannie. If the othelia sate the dannie then the dannie is prime. If someone sate the dannie and they do not like the dannie then the dannie does not visit the othelia. The othelia outfight the dannie.", "logic": "\nPetalless(dannie)\nnot Limacoid(dannie)\nPrime(dannie)\nCaseate(dannie, othelia)\nSate(dannie, othelia)\nOutfight(dannie, othelia)\nJeweled(othelia)\nPrime(othelia)\nCaseate(othelia, dannie)\nSate(othelia, dannie)\nforall x (Conversant(x) -> Outfight(x, dannie))\nforall x (Petalless(x) and Caseate(x, othelia) -> not Outfight(x, dannie))\nforall x (Outfight(x, dannie) -> not Caseate(x, othelia))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and not Limacoid(x) -> Caseate(x, othelia))\nforall x (Sate(x, othelia) -> Outfight(othelia, dannie))\nforall x (Caseate(x, othelia) and Sate(x, dannie) -> Caseate(othelia, dannie))\nSate(othelia, dannie) -> Prime(dannie)\nforall x (Sate(x, dannie) and not Caseate(x, dannie) -> not Outfight(dannie, othelia))\n\nOutfight(othelia, dannie)\n\nSate(dannie, othelia) and forall x (Sate(x, othelia) -> Outfight(othelia, dannie)) -> therefore Outfight(othelia, dannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The carrie is ateleiotic. The carrie is not needful. The carrie is resolute. The carrie busk the irvin. The carrie rout the irvin. The carrie noose the irvin. The irvin is cubital. The irvin is resolute. The irvin busk the carrie. The irvin rout the carrie. If someone is urgent then they visit the carrie. If someone is ateleiotic and they like the irvin then they do not visit the carrie. If someone noose the carrie then they do not like the irvin. If someone is cubital and not needful then they like the irvin. If someone rout the irvin then the irvin noose the carrie. If someone busk the irvin and they see the carrie then the irvin busk the carrie. If the irvin rout the carrie then the carrie is resolute. If someone rout the carrie and they do not like the carrie then the carrie does not visit the irvin. The carrie noose the carrie.", "logic": "\nAteleiotic(carrie)\nnot Needful(carrie)\nResolute(carrie)\nBusk(carrie, irvin)\nRout(carrie, irvin)\nNoose(carrie, irvin)\nCubital(irvin)\nResolute(irvin)\nBusk(irvin, carrie)\nRout(irvin, carrie)\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Noose(x, carrie))\nforall x (Ateleiotic(x) and Busk(x, irvin) -> not Noose(x, carrie))\nforall x (Noose(x, carrie) -> not Busk(x, irvin))\nforall x (Cubital(x) and not Needful(x) -> Busk(x, irvin))\nforall x (Rout(x, irvin) -> Noose(irvin, carrie))\nforall x (Busk(x, irvin) and Rout(x, carrie) -> Busk(irvin, carrie))\nRout(irvin, carrie) -> Resolute(carrie)\nforall x (Rout(x, carrie) and not Busk(x, carrie) -> not Noose(carrie, irvin))\n\nNoose(carrie, carrie)\n\nAteleiotic(carrie) and Busk(carrie, irvin) and forall x (Ateleiotic(x) and Busk(x, irvin) -> not Noose(x, carrie)) -> therefore not Noose(carrie, carrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The matthus is grumous. The matthus is not scented. The matthus is encouraged. The matthus literalise the guillermo. The matthus compose the guillermo. The matthus convalesce the guillermo. The guillermo is fine. The guillermo is encouraged. The guillermo literalise the matthus. The guillermo compose the matthus. If someone is faltering then they visit the matthus. If someone is grumous and they like the guillermo then they do not visit the matthus. If someone convalesce the matthus then they do not like the guillermo. If someone is fine and not scented then they like the guillermo. If someone compose the guillermo then the guillermo convalesce the matthus. If someone literalise the guillermo and they see the matthus then the guillermo literalise the matthus. If the guillermo compose the matthus then the matthus is encouraged. If someone compose the matthus and they do not like the matthus then the matthus does not visit the guillermo. The guillermo does not like the guillermo.", "logic": "\nGrumous(matthus)\nnot Scented(matthus)\nEncouraged(matthus)\nLiteralise(matthus, guillermo)\nCompose(matthus, guillermo)\nConvalesce(matthus, guillermo)\nFine(guillermo)\nEncouraged(guillermo)\nLiteralise(guillermo, matthus)\nCompose(guillermo, matthus)\nforall x (Faltering(x) -> Convalesce(x, matthus))\nforall x (Grumous(x) and Literalise(x, guillermo) -> not Convalesce(x, matthus))\nforall x (Convalesce(x, matthus) -> not Literalise(x, guillermo))\nforall x (Fine(x) and not Scented(x) -> Literalise(x, guillermo))\nforall x (Compose(x, guillermo) -> Convalesce(guillermo, matthus))\nforall x (Literalise(x, guillermo) and Compose(x, matthus) -> Literalise(guillermo, matthus))\nCompose(guillermo, matthus) -> Encouraged(matthus)\nforall x (Compose(x, matthus) and not Literalise(x, matthus) -> not Convalesce(matthus, guillermo))\n\nnot Literalise(guillermo, guillermo)\n\nCompose(matthus, guillermo) and forall x (Compose(x, guillermo) -> Convalesce(guillermo, matthus)) -> therefore Convalesce(guillermo, matthus) Convalesce(guillermo, matthus) and forall x (Convalesce(x, matthus) -> not Literalise(x, guillermo)) -> therefore not Literalise(guillermo, guillermo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The opaline is eightfold. The opaline is not strident. The opaline is drippy. The opaline languish the kellia. The opaline deface the kellia. The opaline brisk the kellia. The kellia is momentous. The kellia is drippy. The kellia languish the opaline. The kellia deface the opaline. If someone is sulphuric then they visit the opaline. If someone is eightfold and they like the kellia then they do not visit the opaline. If someone brisk the opaline then they do not like the kellia. If someone is momentous and not strident then they like the kellia. If someone deface the kellia then the kellia brisk the opaline. If someone languish the kellia and they see the opaline then the kellia languish the opaline. If the kellia deface the opaline then the opaline is drippy. If someone deface the opaline and they do not like the opaline then the opaline does not visit the kellia. The kellia languish the kellia.", "logic": "\nEightfold(opaline)\nnot Strident(opaline)\nDrippy(opaline)\nLanguish(opaline, kellia)\nDeface(opaline, kellia)\nBrisk(opaline, kellia)\nMomentous(kellia)\nDrippy(kellia)\nLanguish(kellia, opaline)\nDeface(kellia, opaline)\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Brisk(x, opaline))\nforall x (Eightfold(x) and Languish(x, kellia) -> not Brisk(x, opaline))\nforall x (Brisk(x, opaline) -> not Languish(x, kellia))\nforall x (Momentous(x) and not Strident(x) -> Languish(x, kellia))\nforall x (Deface(x, kellia) -> Brisk(kellia, opaline))\nforall x (Languish(x, kellia) and Deface(x, opaline) -> Languish(kellia, opaline))\nDeface(kellia, opaline) -> Drippy(opaline)\nforall x (Deface(x, opaline) and not Languish(x, opaline) -> not Brisk(opaline, kellia))\n\nLanguish(kellia, kellia)\n\nDeface(opaline, kellia) and forall x (Deface(x, kellia) -> Brisk(kellia, opaline)) -> therefore Brisk(kellia, opaline) Brisk(kellia, opaline) and forall x (Brisk(x, opaline) -> not Languish(x, kellia)) -> therefore not Languish(kellia, kellia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The trista is dignified. The trista is not opposing. The trista is rewarding. The trista harmonise the rudolf. The trista unbutton the rudolf. The trista burp the rudolf. The rudolf is labial. The rudolf is rewarding. The rudolf harmonise the trista. The rudolf unbutton the trista. If someone is cagy then they visit the trista. If someone is dignified and they like the rudolf then they do not visit the trista. If someone burp the trista then they do not like the rudolf. If someone is labial and not opposing then they like the rudolf. If someone unbutton the rudolf then the rudolf burp the trista. If someone harmonise the rudolf and they see the trista then the rudolf harmonise the trista. If the rudolf unbutton the trista then the trista is rewarding. If someone unbutton the trista and they do not like the trista then the trista does not visit the rudolf. The rudolf does not see the rudolf.", "logic": "\nDignified(trista)\nnot Opposing(trista)\nRewarding(trista)\nHarmonise(trista, rudolf)\nUnbutton(trista, rudolf)\nBurp(trista, rudolf)\nLabial(rudolf)\nRewarding(rudolf)\nHarmonise(rudolf, trista)\nUnbutton(rudolf, trista)\nforall x (Cagy(x) -> Burp(x, trista))\nforall x (Dignified(x) and Harmonise(x, rudolf) -> not Burp(x, trista))\nforall x (Burp(x, trista) -> not Harmonise(x, rudolf))\nforall x (Labial(x) and not Opposing(x) -> Harmonise(x, rudolf))\nforall x (Unbutton(x, rudolf) -> Burp(rudolf, trista))\nforall x (Harmonise(x, rudolf) and Unbutton(x, trista) -> Harmonise(rudolf, trista))\nUnbutton(rudolf, trista) -> Rewarding(trista)\nforall x (Unbutton(x, trista) and not Harmonise(x, trista) -> not Burp(trista, rudolf))\n\nnot Unbutton(rudolf, rudolf)\n\nnot Unbutton(rudolf, rudolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The martelle is spasmodic. The martelle is not grueling. The martelle is grasping. The martelle backlash the ethan. The martelle spang the ethan. The martelle crumple the ethan. The ethan is enigmatic. The ethan is grasping. The ethan backlash the martelle. The ethan spang the martelle. If someone is surd then they visit the martelle. If someone is spasmodic and they like the ethan then they do not visit the martelle. If someone crumple the martelle then they do not like the ethan. If someone is enigmatic and not grueling then they like the ethan. If someone spang the ethan then the ethan crumple the martelle. If someone backlash the ethan and they see the martelle then the ethan backlash the martelle. If the ethan spang the martelle then the martelle is grasping. If someone spang the martelle and they do not like the martelle then the martelle does not visit the ethan. The martelle is surd.", "logic": "\nSpasmodic(martelle)\nnot Grueling(martelle)\nGrasping(martelle)\nBacklash(martelle, ethan)\nSpang(martelle, ethan)\nCrumple(martelle, ethan)\nEnigmatic(ethan)\nGrasping(ethan)\nBacklash(ethan, martelle)\nSpang(ethan, martelle)\nforall x (Surd(x) -> Crumple(x, martelle))\nforall x (Spasmodic(x) and Backlash(x, ethan) -> not Crumple(x, martelle))\nforall x (Crumple(x, martelle) -> not Backlash(x, ethan))\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) and not Grueling(x) -> Backlash(x, ethan))\nforall x (Spang(x, ethan) -> Crumple(ethan, martelle))\nforall x (Backlash(x, ethan) and Spang(x, martelle) -> Backlash(ethan, martelle))\nSpang(ethan, martelle) -> Grasping(martelle)\nforall x (Spang(x, martelle) and not Backlash(x, martelle) -> not Crumple(martelle, ethan))\n\nSurd(martelle)\n\nSurd(martelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The kelcie is oxidized. The kelcie is not marshy. The kelcie is excitable. The kelcie outface the luelle. The kelcie erect the luelle. The kelcie islamise the luelle. The luelle is littler. The luelle is excitable. The luelle outface the kelcie. The luelle erect the kelcie. If someone is monoclinic then they visit the kelcie. If someone is oxidized and they like the luelle then they do not visit the kelcie. If someone islamise the kelcie then they do not like the luelle. If someone is littler and not marshy then they like the luelle. If someone erect the luelle then the luelle islamise the kelcie. If someone outface the luelle and they see the kelcie then the luelle outface the kelcie. If the luelle erect the kelcie then the kelcie is excitable. If someone erect the kelcie and they do not like the kelcie then the kelcie does not visit the luelle. The luelle does not visit the luelle.", "logic": "\nOxidized(kelcie)\nnot Marshy(kelcie)\nExcitable(kelcie)\nOutface(kelcie, luelle)\nErect(kelcie, luelle)\nIslamise(kelcie, luelle)\nLittler(luelle)\nExcitable(luelle)\nOutface(luelle, kelcie)\nErect(luelle, kelcie)\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) -> Islamise(x, kelcie))\nforall x (Oxidized(x) and Outface(x, luelle) -> not Islamise(x, kelcie))\nforall x (Islamise(x, kelcie) -> not Outface(x, luelle))\nforall x (Littler(x) and not Marshy(x) -> Outface(x, luelle))\nforall x (Erect(x, luelle) -> Islamise(luelle, kelcie))\nforall x (Outface(x, luelle) and Erect(x, kelcie) -> Outface(luelle, kelcie))\nErect(luelle, kelcie) -> Excitable(kelcie)\nforall x (Erect(x, kelcie) and not Outface(x, kelcie) -> not Islamise(kelcie, luelle))\n\nnot Islamise(luelle, luelle)\n\nnot Islamise(luelle, luelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The joanne is scurfy. The joanne is not pseudo. The joanne is bromic. The joanne disgorge the bing. The joanne scrawl the bing. The joanne undergrow the bing. The bing is placid. The bing is bromic. The bing disgorge the joanne. The bing scrawl the joanne. If someone is tudor then they visit the joanne. If someone is scurfy and they like the bing then they do not visit the joanne. If someone undergrow the joanne then they do not like the bing. If someone is placid and not pseudo then they like the bing. If someone scrawl the bing then the bing undergrow the joanne. If someone disgorge the bing and they see the joanne then the bing disgorge the joanne. If the bing scrawl the joanne then the joanne is bromic. If someone scrawl the joanne and they do not like the joanne then the joanne does not visit the bing. The joanne disgorge the joanne.", "logic": "\nScurfy(joanne)\nnot Pseudo(joanne)\nBromic(joanne)\nDisgorge(joanne, bing)\nScrawl(joanne, bing)\nUndergrow(joanne, bing)\nPlacid(bing)\nBromic(bing)\nDisgorge(bing, joanne)\nScrawl(bing, joanne)\nforall x (Tudor(x) -> Undergrow(x, joanne))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) and Disgorge(x, bing) -> not Undergrow(x, joanne))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, joanne) -> not Disgorge(x, bing))\nforall x (Placid(x) and not Pseudo(x) -> Disgorge(x, bing))\nforall x (Scrawl(x, bing) -> Undergrow(bing, joanne))\nforall x (Disgorge(x, bing) and Scrawl(x, joanne) -> Disgorge(bing, joanne))\nScrawl(bing, joanne) -> Bromic(joanne)\nforall x (Scrawl(x, joanne) and not Disgorge(x, joanne) -> not Undergrow(joanne, bing))\n\nDisgorge(joanne, joanne)\n\nDisgorge(joanne, joanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The sada is oratorical. The sada is not delusional. The sada is unassuming. The sada drivel the zarah. The sada regularise the zarah. The sada intercede the zarah. The zarah is cyprinoid. The zarah is unassuming. The zarah drivel the sada. The zarah regularise the sada. If someone is suited then they visit the sada. If someone is oratorical and they like the zarah then they do not visit the sada. If someone intercede the sada then they do not like the zarah. If someone is cyprinoid and not delusional then they like the zarah. If someone regularise the zarah then the zarah intercede the sada. If someone drivel the zarah and they see the sada then the zarah drivel the sada. If the zarah regularise the sada then the sada is unassuming. If someone regularise the sada and they do not like the sada then the sada does not visit the zarah. The zarah is not delusional.", "logic": "\nOratorical(sada)\nnot Delusional(sada)\nUnassuming(sada)\nDrivel(sada, zarah)\nRegularise(sada, zarah)\nIntercede(sada, zarah)\nCyprinoid(zarah)\nUnassuming(zarah)\nDrivel(zarah, sada)\nRegularise(zarah, sada)\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Intercede(x, sada))\nforall x (Oratorical(x) and Drivel(x, zarah) -> not Intercede(x, sada))\nforall x (Intercede(x, sada) -> not Drivel(x, zarah))\nforall x (Cyprinoid(x) and not Delusional(x) -> Drivel(x, zarah))\nforall x (Regularise(x, zarah) -> Intercede(zarah, sada))\nforall x (Drivel(x, zarah) and Regularise(x, sada) -> Drivel(zarah, sada))\nRegularise(zarah, sada) -> Unassuming(sada)\nforall x (Regularise(x, sada) and not Drivel(x, sada) -> not Intercede(sada, zarah))\n\nnot Delusional(zarah)\n\nnot Delusional(zarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The anatollo is softened. The anatollo is not easterly. The anatollo is sweptback. The anatollo venesect the lanie. The anatollo etiolate the lanie. The anatollo suggest the lanie. The lanie is alsatian. The lanie is sweptback. The lanie venesect the anatollo. The lanie etiolate the anatollo. If someone is stimulant then they visit the anatollo. If someone is softened and they like the lanie then they do not visit the anatollo. If someone suggest the anatollo then they do not like the lanie. If someone is alsatian and not easterly then they like the lanie. If someone etiolate the lanie then the lanie suggest the anatollo. If someone venesect the lanie and they see the anatollo then the lanie venesect the anatollo. If the lanie etiolate the anatollo then the anatollo is sweptback. If someone etiolate the anatollo and they do not like the anatollo then the anatollo does not visit the lanie. The lanie is softened.", "logic": "\nSoftened(anatollo)\nnot Easterly(anatollo)\nSweptback(anatollo)\nVenesect(anatollo, lanie)\nEtiolate(anatollo, lanie)\nSuggest(anatollo, lanie)\nAlsatian(lanie)\nSweptback(lanie)\nVenesect(lanie, anatollo)\nEtiolate(lanie, anatollo)\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> Suggest(x, anatollo))\nforall x (Softened(x) and Venesect(x, lanie) -> not Suggest(x, anatollo))\nforall x (Suggest(x, anatollo) -> not Venesect(x, lanie))\nforall x (Alsatian(x) and not Easterly(x) -> Venesect(x, lanie))\nforall x (Etiolate(x, lanie) -> Suggest(lanie, anatollo))\nforall x (Venesect(x, lanie) and Etiolate(x, anatollo) -> Venesect(lanie, anatollo))\nEtiolate(lanie, anatollo) -> Sweptback(anatollo)\nforall x (Etiolate(x, anatollo) and not Venesect(x, anatollo) -> not Suggest(anatollo, lanie))\n\nSoftened(lanie)\n\nSoftened(lanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-913"} {"premises": "The sylvan chondrify the trina. The sylvan chondrify the arleyne. The sylvan asphalt the trina. The sylvan is feigned. The suzzy asphalt the sylvan. The suzzy is manichee. The suzzy is feigned. The suzzy corner the arleyne. The trina asphalt the sylvan. The arleyne chondrify the suzzy. If the sylvan is polemical then the sylvan corner the arleyne. If something chondrify the arleyne then it corner the arleyne. If the sylvan is feigned and the sylvan is cutaneous then the sylvan asphalt the trina. If the suzzy asphalt the sylvan and the sylvan chondrify the trina then the trina chondrify the sylvan. If something chondrify the sylvan and the sylvan is feigned then it corner the arleyne. If something asphalt the trina then the trina corner the suzzy. The arleyne chondrify the suzzy.", "logic": "\nChondrify(sylvan, trina)\nChondrify(sylvan, arleyne)\nAsphalt(sylvan, trina)\nFeigned(sylvan)\nAsphalt(suzzy, sylvan)\nManichee(suzzy)\nFeigned(suzzy)\nCorner(suzzy, arleyne)\nAsphalt(trina, sylvan)\nChondrify(arleyne, suzzy)\nPolemical(sylvan) -> Corner(sylvan, arleyne)\nforall x (Chondrify(x, arleyne) -> Corner(x, arleyne))\nFeigned(sylvan) and Cutaneous(sylvan) -> Asphalt(sylvan, trina)\nAsphalt(suzzy, sylvan) and Chondrify(sylvan, trina) -> Chondrify(trina, sylvan)\nforall x (Chondrify(x, sylvan) and Feigned(sylvan) -> Corner(x, arleyne))\nforall x (Asphalt(x, trina) -> Corner(trina, suzzy))\n\nChondrify(arleyne, suzzy)\n\ntherefore Chondrify(arleyne, suzzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The tamera adolesce the olympe. The tamera adolesce the red. The tamera retch the olympe. The tamera is finer. The vibhu retch the tamera. The vibhu is sclerotic. The vibhu is finer. The vibhu jolly the red. The olympe retch the tamera. The red adolesce the vibhu. If the tamera is tremulous then the tamera jolly the red. If something adolesce the red then it jolly the red. If the tamera is finer and the tamera is slovakian then the tamera retch the olympe. If the vibhu retch the tamera and the tamera adolesce the olympe then the olympe adolesce the tamera. If something adolesce the tamera and the tamera is finer then it jolly the red. If something retch the olympe then the olympe jolly the vibhu. The vibhu does not see the red.", "logic": "\nAdolesce(tamera, olympe)\nAdolesce(tamera, red)\nRetch(tamera, olympe)\nFiner(tamera)\nRetch(vibhu, tamera)\nSclerotic(vibhu)\nFiner(vibhu)\nJolly(vibhu, red)\nRetch(olympe, tamera)\nAdolesce(red, vibhu)\nTremulous(tamera) -> Jolly(tamera, red)\nforall x (Adolesce(x, red) -> Jolly(x, red))\nFiner(tamera) and Slovakian(tamera) -> Retch(tamera, olympe)\nRetch(vibhu, tamera) and Adolesce(tamera, olympe) -> Adolesce(olympe, tamera)\nforall x (Adolesce(x, tamera) and Finer(tamera) -> Jolly(x, red))\nforall x (Retch(x, olympe) -> Jolly(olympe, vibhu))\n\nnot Jolly(vibhu, red)\n\ntherefore Jolly(vibhu, red)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The sharna play the janette. The sharna play the concordia. The sharna propagate the janette. The sharna is locomotive. The ezra propagate the sharna. The ezra is hearing. The ezra is locomotive. The ezra shrill the concordia. The janette propagate the sharna. The concordia play the ezra. If the sharna is mere then the sharna shrill the concordia. If something play the concordia then it shrill the concordia. If the sharna is locomotive and the sharna is affinal then the sharna propagate the janette. If the ezra propagate the sharna and the sharna play the janette then the janette play the sharna. If something play the sharna and the sharna is locomotive then it shrill the concordia. If something propagate the janette then the janette shrill the ezra. The janette play the sharna.", "logic": "\nPlay(sharna, janette)\nPlay(sharna, concordia)\nPropagate(sharna, janette)\nLocomotive(sharna)\nPropagate(ezra, sharna)\nHearing(ezra)\nLocomotive(ezra)\nShrill(ezra, concordia)\nPropagate(janette, sharna)\nPlay(concordia, ezra)\nMere(sharna) -> Shrill(sharna, concordia)\nforall x (Play(x, concordia) -> Shrill(x, concordia))\nLocomotive(sharna) and Affinal(sharna) -> Propagate(sharna, janette)\nPropagate(ezra, sharna) and Play(sharna, janette) -> Play(janette, sharna)\nforall x (Play(x, sharna) and Locomotive(sharna) -> Shrill(x, concordia))\nforall x (Propagate(x, janette) -> Shrill(janette, ezra))\n\nPlay(janette, sharna)\n\nPropagate(ezra, sharna) and Play(sharna, janette) and Propagate(ezra, sharna) and Play(sharna, janette) -> Play(janette, sharna) -> therefore Play(janette, sharna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The minetta assibilate the veronike. The minetta assibilate the becki. The minetta isomerise the veronike. The minetta is herbal. The carole isomerise the minetta. The carole is silvery. The carole is herbal. The carole populate the becki. The veronike isomerise the minetta. The becki assibilate the carole. If the minetta is paschal then the minetta populate the becki. If something assibilate the becki then it populate the becki. If the minetta is herbal and the minetta is leisured then the minetta isomerise the veronike. If the carole isomerise the minetta and the minetta assibilate the veronike then the veronike assibilate the minetta. If something assibilate the minetta and the minetta is herbal then it populate the becki. If something isomerise the veronike then the veronike populate the carole. The veronike does not see the carole.", "logic": "\nAssibilate(minetta, veronike)\nAssibilate(minetta, becki)\nIsomerise(minetta, veronike)\nHerbal(minetta)\nIsomerise(carole, minetta)\nSilvery(carole)\nHerbal(carole)\nPopulate(carole, becki)\nIsomerise(veronike, minetta)\nAssibilate(becki, carole)\nPaschal(minetta) -> Populate(minetta, becki)\nforall x (Assibilate(x, becki) -> Populate(x, becki))\nHerbal(minetta) and Leisured(minetta) -> Isomerise(minetta, veronike)\nIsomerise(carole, minetta) and Assibilate(minetta, veronike) -> Assibilate(veronike, minetta)\nforall x (Assibilate(x, minetta) and Herbal(minetta) -> Populate(x, becki))\nforall x (Isomerise(x, veronike) -> Populate(veronike, carole))\n\nnot Populate(veronike, carole)\n\nIsomerise(minetta, veronike) and forall x (Isomerise(x, veronike) -> Populate(veronike, carole)) -> therefore Populate(veronike, carole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The karoly divert the rodd. The karoly divert the elie. The karoly tapdance the rodd. The karoly is later. The lilia tapdance the karoly. The lilia is bedfast. The lilia is later. The lilia assail the elie. The rodd tapdance the karoly. The elie divert the lilia. If the karoly is persistent then the karoly assail the elie. If something divert the elie then it assail the elie. If the karoly is later and the karoly is complete then the karoly tapdance the rodd. If the lilia tapdance the karoly and the karoly divert the rodd then the rodd divert the karoly. If something divert the karoly and the karoly is later then it assail the elie. If something tapdance the rodd then the rodd assail the lilia. The rodd assail the elie.", "logic": "\nDivert(karoly, rodd)\nDivert(karoly, elie)\nTapdance(karoly, rodd)\nLater(karoly)\nTapdance(lilia, karoly)\nBedfast(lilia)\nLater(lilia)\nAssail(lilia, elie)\nTapdance(rodd, karoly)\nDivert(elie, lilia)\nPersistent(karoly) -> Assail(karoly, elie)\nforall x (Divert(x, elie) -> Assail(x, elie))\nLater(karoly) and Complete(karoly) -> Tapdance(karoly, rodd)\nTapdance(lilia, karoly) and Divert(karoly, rodd) -> Divert(rodd, karoly)\nforall x (Divert(x, karoly) and Later(karoly) -> Assail(x, elie))\nforall x (Tapdance(x, rodd) -> Assail(rodd, lilia))\n\nAssail(rodd, elie)\n\nTapdance(lilia, karoly) and Divert(karoly, rodd) and Tapdance(lilia, karoly) and Divert(karoly, rodd) -> Divert(rodd, karoly) -> therefore Divert(rodd, karoly) Divert(rodd, karoly) and Later(karoly) and forall x (Divert(x, karoly) and Later(karoly) -> Assail(x, elie)) -> therefore Assail(rodd, elie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The raleigh overstock the bayard. The raleigh overstock the norah. The raleigh dimension the bayard. The raleigh is referenced. The charlton dimension the raleigh. The charlton is estrogenic. The charlton is referenced. The charlton overbid the norah. The bayard dimension the raleigh. The norah overstock the charlton. If the raleigh is fimbriate then the raleigh overbid the norah. If something overstock the norah then it overbid the norah. If the raleigh is referenced and the raleigh is ransacked then the raleigh dimension the bayard. If the charlton dimension the raleigh and the raleigh overstock the bayard then the bayard overstock the raleigh. If something overstock the raleigh and the raleigh is referenced then it overbid the norah. If something dimension the bayard then the bayard overbid the charlton. The bayard does not see the norah.", "logic": "\nOverstock(raleigh, bayard)\nOverstock(raleigh, norah)\nDimension(raleigh, bayard)\nReferenced(raleigh)\nDimension(charlton, raleigh)\nEstrogenic(charlton)\nReferenced(charlton)\nOverbid(charlton, norah)\nDimension(bayard, raleigh)\nOverstock(norah, charlton)\nFimbriate(raleigh) -> Overbid(raleigh, norah)\nforall x (Overstock(x, norah) -> Overbid(x, norah))\nReferenced(raleigh) and Ransacked(raleigh) -> Dimension(raleigh, bayard)\nDimension(charlton, raleigh) and Overstock(raleigh, bayard) -> Overstock(bayard, raleigh)\nforall x (Overstock(x, raleigh) and Referenced(raleigh) -> Overbid(x, norah))\nforall x (Dimension(x, bayard) -> Overbid(bayard, charlton))\n\nnot Overbid(bayard, norah)\n\nDimension(charlton, raleigh) and Overstock(raleigh, bayard) and Dimension(charlton, raleigh) and Overstock(raleigh, bayard) -> Overstock(bayard, raleigh) -> therefore Overstock(bayard, raleigh) Overstock(bayard, raleigh) and Referenced(raleigh) and forall x (Overstock(x, raleigh) and Referenced(raleigh) -> Overbid(x, norah)) -> therefore Overbid(bayard, norah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The otes sclaff the carleigh. The otes sclaff the kissiah. The otes transport the carleigh. The otes is sodden. The giovanni transport the otes. The giovanni is fineable. The giovanni is sodden. The giovanni sympathize the kissiah. The carleigh transport the otes. The kissiah sclaff the giovanni. If the otes is lancinate then the otes sympathize the kissiah. If something sclaff the kissiah then it sympathize the kissiah. If the otes is sodden and the otes is unpledged then the otes transport the carleigh. If the giovanni transport the otes and the otes sclaff the carleigh then the carleigh sclaff the otes. If something sclaff the otes and the otes is sodden then it sympathize the kissiah. If something transport the carleigh then the carleigh sympathize the giovanni. The kissiah does not see the kissiah.", "logic": "\nSclaff(otes, carleigh)\nSclaff(otes, kissiah)\nTransport(otes, carleigh)\nSodden(otes)\nTransport(giovanni, otes)\nFineable(giovanni)\nSodden(giovanni)\nSympathize(giovanni, kissiah)\nTransport(carleigh, otes)\nSclaff(kissiah, giovanni)\nLancinate(otes) -> Sympathize(otes, kissiah)\nforall x (Sclaff(x, kissiah) -> Sympathize(x, kissiah))\nSodden(otes) and Unpledged(otes) -> Transport(otes, carleigh)\nTransport(giovanni, otes) and Sclaff(otes, carleigh) -> Sclaff(carleigh, otes)\nforall x (Sclaff(x, otes) and Sodden(otes) -> Sympathize(x, kissiah))\nforall x (Transport(x, carleigh) -> Sympathize(carleigh, giovanni))\n\nnot Sympathize(kissiah, kissiah)\n\nforall x (Sclaff(x, kissiah) -> Sympathize(x, kissiah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The jerome denote the deborah. The jerome denote the gladys. The jerome slue the deborah. The jerome is upper. The margette slue the jerome. The margette is reformable. The margette is upper. The margette braze the gladys. The deborah slue the jerome. The gladys denote the margette. If the jerome is averse then the jerome braze the gladys. If something denote the gladys then it braze the gladys. If the jerome is upper and the jerome is phantom then the jerome slue the deborah. If the margette slue the jerome and the jerome denote the deborah then the deborah denote the jerome. If something denote the jerome and the jerome is upper then it braze the gladys. If something slue the deborah then the deborah braze the margette. The margette denote the gladys.", "logic": "\nDenote(jerome, deborah)\nDenote(jerome, gladys)\nSlue(jerome, deborah)\nUpper(jerome)\nSlue(margette, jerome)\nReformable(margette)\nUpper(margette)\nBraze(margette, gladys)\nSlue(deborah, jerome)\nDenote(gladys, margette)\nAverse(jerome) -> Braze(jerome, gladys)\nforall x (Denote(x, gladys) -> Braze(x, gladys))\nUpper(jerome) and Phantom(jerome) -> Slue(jerome, deborah)\nSlue(margette, jerome) and Denote(jerome, deborah) -> Denote(deborah, jerome)\nforall x (Denote(x, jerome) and Upper(jerome) -> Braze(x, gladys))\nforall x (Slue(x, deborah) -> Braze(deborah, margette))\n\nDenote(margette, gladys)\n\nDenote(margette, gladys) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The jannel taunt the maude. The jannel taunt the kimberli. The jannel chirr the maude. The jannel is bipedal. The carol chirr the jannel. The carol is corked. The carol is bipedal. The carol booze the kimberli. The maude chirr the jannel. The kimberli taunt the carol. If the jannel is collected then the jannel booze the kimberli. If something taunt the kimberli then it booze the kimberli. If the jannel is bipedal and the jannel is meatless then the jannel chirr the maude. If the carol chirr the jannel and the jannel taunt the maude then the maude taunt the jannel. If something taunt the jannel and the jannel is bipedal then it booze the kimberli. If something chirr the maude then the maude booze the carol. The kimberli does not eat the maude.", "logic": "\nTaunt(jannel, maude)\nTaunt(jannel, kimberli)\nChirr(jannel, maude)\nBipedal(jannel)\nChirr(carol, jannel)\nCorked(carol)\nBipedal(carol)\nBooze(carol, kimberli)\nChirr(maude, jannel)\nTaunt(kimberli, carol)\nCollected(jannel) -> Booze(jannel, kimberli)\nforall x (Taunt(x, kimberli) -> Booze(x, kimberli))\nBipedal(jannel) and Meatless(jannel) -> Chirr(jannel, maude)\nChirr(carol, jannel) and Taunt(jannel, maude) -> Taunt(maude, jannel)\nforall x (Taunt(x, jannel) and Bipedal(jannel) -> Booze(x, kimberli))\nforall x (Chirr(x, maude) -> Booze(maude, carol))\n\nnot Chirr(kimberli, maude)\n\nnot Chirr(kimberli, maude) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The flipper fowl the burta. The flipper fowl the jeremy. The flipper hedgehop the burta. The flipper is inherent. The mildrid hedgehop the flipper. The mildrid is trustful. The mildrid is inherent. The mildrid immigrate the jeremy. The burta hedgehop the flipper. The jeremy fowl the mildrid. If the flipper is latish then the flipper immigrate the jeremy. If something fowl the jeremy then it immigrate the jeremy. If the flipper is inherent and the flipper is opulent then the flipper hedgehop the burta. If the mildrid hedgehop the flipper and the flipper fowl the burta then the burta fowl the flipper. If something fowl the flipper and the flipper is inherent then it immigrate the jeremy. If something hedgehop the burta then the burta immigrate the mildrid. The burta fowl the jeremy.", "logic": "\nFowl(flipper, burta)\nFowl(flipper, jeremy)\nHedgehop(flipper, burta)\nInherent(flipper)\nHedgehop(mildrid, flipper)\nTrustful(mildrid)\nInherent(mildrid)\nImmigrate(mildrid, jeremy)\nHedgehop(burta, flipper)\nFowl(jeremy, mildrid)\nLatish(flipper) -> Immigrate(flipper, jeremy)\nforall x (Fowl(x, jeremy) -> Immigrate(x, jeremy))\nInherent(flipper) and Opulent(flipper) -> Hedgehop(flipper, burta)\nHedgehop(mildrid, flipper) and Fowl(flipper, burta) -> Fowl(burta, flipper)\nforall x (Fowl(x, flipper) and Inherent(flipper) -> Immigrate(x, jeremy))\nforall x (Hedgehop(x, burta) -> Immigrate(burta, mildrid))\n\nFowl(burta, jeremy)\n\nFowl(burta, jeremy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The kraig nosh the wallache. The kraig nosh the lenka. The kraig lucubrate the wallache. The kraig is katharobic. The gardener lucubrate the kraig. The gardener is poor. The gardener is katharobic. The gardener breast the lenka. The wallache lucubrate the kraig. The lenka nosh the gardener. If the kraig is unwrapped then the kraig breast the lenka. If something nosh the lenka then it breast the lenka. If the kraig is katharobic and the kraig is rotatory then the kraig lucubrate the wallache. If the gardener lucubrate the kraig and the kraig nosh the wallache then the wallache nosh the kraig. If something nosh the kraig and the kraig is katharobic then it breast the lenka. If something lucubrate the wallache then the wallache breast the gardener. The wallache does not see the kraig.", "logic": "\nNosh(kraig, wallache)\nNosh(kraig, lenka)\nLucubrate(kraig, wallache)\nKatharobic(kraig)\nLucubrate(gardener, kraig)\nPoor(gardener)\nKatharobic(gardener)\nBreast(gardener, lenka)\nLucubrate(wallache, kraig)\nNosh(lenka, gardener)\nUnwrapped(kraig) -> Breast(kraig, lenka)\nforall x (Nosh(x, lenka) -> Breast(x, lenka))\nKatharobic(kraig) and Rotatory(kraig) -> Lucubrate(kraig, wallache)\nLucubrate(gardener, kraig) and Nosh(kraig, wallache) -> Nosh(wallache, kraig)\nforall x (Nosh(x, kraig) and Katharobic(kraig) -> Breast(x, lenka))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, wallache) -> Breast(wallache, gardener))\n\nnot Breast(wallache, kraig)\n\nnot Breast(wallache, kraig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The damian motorize the abram. The damian motorize the annalyse. The damian irritate the abram. The damian is bright. The debby irritate the damian. The debby is vulgar. The debby is bright. The debby contain the annalyse. The abram irritate the damian. The annalyse motorize the debby. If the damian is passive then the damian contain the annalyse. If something motorize the annalyse then it contain the annalyse. If the damian is bright and the damian is accusive then the damian irritate the abram. If the debby irritate the damian and the damian motorize the abram then the abram motorize the damian. If something motorize the damian and the damian is bright then it contain the annalyse. If something irritate the abram then the abram contain the debby. The abram motorize the abram.", "logic": "\nMotorize(damian, abram)\nMotorize(damian, annalyse)\nIrritate(damian, abram)\nBright(damian)\nIrritate(debby, damian)\nVulgar(debby)\nBright(debby)\nContain(debby, annalyse)\nIrritate(abram, damian)\nMotorize(annalyse, debby)\nPassive(damian) -> Contain(damian, annalyse)\nforall x (Motorize(x, annalyse) -> Contain(x, annalyse))\nBright(damian) and Accusive(damian) -> Irritate(damian, abram)\nIrritate(debby, damian) and Motorize(damian, abram) -> Motorize(abram, damian)\nforall x (Motorize(x, damian) and Bright(damian) -> Contain(x, annalyse))\nforall x (Irritate(x, abram) -> Contain(abram, debby))\n\nMotorize(abram, abram)\n\nMotorize(abram, abram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-754"} {"premises": "The wendeline is activated. The wendeline flux the jeff. The jeff misgive the wendeline. The jeff is activated. The jeff is cheerful. The jeff gibber the wendeline. The jeff flux the wendeline. If someone flux the jeff and the jeff flux the wendeline then the wendeline misgive the jeff. If someone misgive the jeff then they are cheerful. The jeff is cheerful.", "logic": "\nActivated(wendeline)\nFlux(wendeline, jeff)\nMisgive(jeff, wendeline)\nActivated(jeff)\nCheerful(jeff)\nGibber(jeff, wendeline)\nFlux(jeff, wendeline)\nforall x (Flux(x, jeff) and Flux(jeff, wendeline) -> Misgive(wendeline, jeff))\nforall x (Misgive(x, jeff) -> Cheerful(x))\n\nCheerful(jeff)\n\ntherefore Cheerful(jeff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The sosanna is adorned. The sosanna anatomise the binky. The binky nitpick the sosanna. The binky is adorned. The binky is sumptuous. The binky generate the sosanna. The binky anatomise the sosanna. If someone anatomise the binky and the binky anatomise the sosanna then the sosanna nitpick the binky. If someone nitpick the binky then they are sumptuous. The binky does not chase the sosanna.", "logic": "\nAdorned(sosanna)\nAnatomise(sosanna, binky)\nNitpick(binky, sosanna)\nAdorned(binky)\nSumptuous(binky)\nGenerate(binky, sosanna)\nAnatomise(binky, sosanna)\nforall x (Anatomise(x, binky) and Anatomise(binky, sosanna) -> Nitpick(sosanna, binky))\nforall x (Nitpick(x, binky) -> Sumptuous(x))\n\nnot Nitpick(binky, sosanna)\n\ntherefore Nitpick(binky, sosanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The leese is wrathful. The leese punish the cesar. The cesar entangle the leese. The cesar is wrathful. The cesar is nonkosher. The cesar revere the leese. The cesar punish the leese. If someone punish the cesar and the cesar punish the leese then the leese entangle the cesar. If someone entangle the cesar then they are nonkosher. The leese entangle the cesar.", "logic": "\nWrathful(leese)\nPunish(leese, cesar)\nEntangle(cesar, leese)\nWrathful(cesar)\nNonkosher(cesar)\nRevere(cesar, leese)\nPunish(cesar, leese)\nforall x (Punish(x, cesar) and Punish(cesar, leese) -> Entangle(leese, cesar))\nforall x (Entangle(x, cesar) -> Nonkosher(x))\n\nEntangle(leese, cesar)\n\nPunish(leese, cesar) and Punish(cesar, leese) and forall x (Punish(x, cesar) and Punish(cesar, leese) -> Entangle(leese, cesar)) -> therefore Entangle(leese, cesar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The clemmie is heuristic. The clemmie emit the carter. The carter cultivate the clemmie. The carter is heuristic. The carter is cheerless. The carter jeopardize the clemmie. The carter emit the clemmie. If someone emit the carter and the carter emit the clemmie then the clemmie cultivate the carter. If someone cultivate the carter then they are cheerless. The clemmie does not chase the carter.", "logic": "\nHeuristic(clemmie)\nEmit(clemmie, carter)\nCultivate(carter, clemmie)\nHeuristic(carter)\nCheerless(carter)\nJeopardize(carter, clemmie)\nEmit(carter, clemmie)\nforall x (Emit(x, carter) and Emit(carter, clemmie) -> Cultivate(clemmie, carter))\nforall x (Cultivate(x, carter) -> Cheerless(x))\n\nnot Cultivate(clemmie, carter)\n\nEmit(clemmie, carter) and Emit(carter, clemmie) and forall x (Emit(x, carter) and Emit(carter, clemmie) -> Cultivate(clemmie, carter)) -> therefore Cultivate(clemmie, carter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The elisa is current. The elisa naturalise the marris. The marris allegorise the elisa. The marris is current. The marris is caecilian. The marris hull the elisa. The marris naturalise the elisa. If someone naturalise the marris and the marris naturalise the elisa then the elisa allegorise the marris. If someone allegorise the marris then they are caecilian. The elisa is caecilian.", "logic": "\nCurrent(elisa)\nNaturalise(elisa, marris)\nAllegorise(marris, elisa)\nCurrent(marris)\nCaecilian(marris)\nHull(marris, elisa)\nNaturalise(marris, elisa)\nforall x (Naturalise(x, marris) and Naturalise(marris, elisa) -> Allegorise(elisa, marris))\nforall x (Allegorise(x, marris) -> Caecilian(x))\n\nCaecilian(elisa)\n\nNaturalise(elisa, marris) and Naturalise(marris, elisa) and forall x (Naturalise(x, marris) and Naturalise(marris, elisa) -> Allegorise(elisa, marris)) -> therefore Allegorise(elisa, marris) Allegorise(elisa, marris) and forall x (Allegorise(x, marris) -> Caecilian(x)) -> therefore Caecilian(elisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The bunnie is societal. The bunnie granulate the thia. The thia rubify the bunnie. The thia is societal. The thia is reverting. The thia aggress the bunnie. The thia granulate the bunnie. If someone granulate the thia and the thia granulate the bunnie then the bunnie rubify the thia. If someone rubify the thia then they are reverting. The bunnie is not reverting.", "logic": "\nSocietal(bunnie)\nGranulate(bunnie, thia)\nRubify(thia, bunnie)\nSocietal(thia)\nReverting(thia)\nAggress(thia, bunnie)\nGranulate(thia, bunnie)\nforall x (Granulate(x, thia) and Granulate(thia, bunnie) -> Rubify(bunnie, thia))\nforall x (Rubify(x, thia) -> Reverting(x))\n\nnot Reverting(bunnie)\n\nGranulate(bunnie, thia) and Granulate(thia, bunnie) and forall x (Granulate(x, thia) and Granulate(thia, bunnie) -> Rubify(bunnie, thia)) -> therefore Rubify(bunnie, thia) Rubify(bunnie, thia) and forall x (Rubify(x, thia) -> Reverting(x)) -> therefore Reverting(bunnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The putnam is agnostic. The putnam confection the kelvin. The kelvin dissent the putnam. The kelvin is agnostic. The kelvin is vanished. The kelvin adulate the putnam. The kelvin confection the putnam. If someone confection the kelvin and the kelvin confection the putnam then the putnam dissent the kelvin. If someone dissent the kelvin then they are vanished. The kelvin is not cold.", "logic": "\nAgnostic(putnam)\nConfection(putnam, kelvin)\nDissent(kelvin, putnam)\nAgnostic(kelvin)\nVanished(kelvin)\nAdulate(kelvin, putnam)\nConfection(kelvin, putnam)\nforall x (Confection(x, kelvin) and Confection(kelvin, putnam) -> Dissent(putnam, kelvin))\nforall x (Dissent(x, kelvin) -> Vanished(x))\n\nnot Cold(kelvin)\n\nnot Cold(kelvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The wallie is unpowered. The wallie mire the sorcha. The sorcha cinematize the wallie. The sorcha is unpowered. The sorcha is aspheric. The sorcha postpone the wallie. The sorcha mire the wallie. If someone mire the sorcha and the sorcha mire the wallie then the wallie cinematize the sorcha. If someone cinematize the sorcha then they are aspheric. The wallie is big.", "logic": "\nUnpowered(wallie)\nMire(wallie, sorcha)\nCinematize(sorcha, wallie)\nUnpowered(sorcha)\nAspheric(sorcha)\nPostpone(sorcha, wallie)\nMire(sorcha, wallie)\nforall x (Mire(x, sorcha) and Mire(sorcha, wallie) -> Cinematize(wallie, sorcha))\nforall x (Cinematize(x, sorcha) -> Aspheric(x))\n\nBig(wallie)\n\nBig(wallie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The lilllie is pent. The lilllie palsy the adelle. The adelle crane the lilllie. The adelle is pent. The adelle is gothic. The adelle promulgate the lilllie. The adelle palsy the lilllie. If someone palsy the adelle and the adelle palsy the lilllie then the lilllie crane the adelle. If someone crane the adelle then they are gothic. The lilllie does not need the lilllie.", "logic": "\nPent(lilllie)\nPalsy(lilllie, adelle)\nCrane(adelle, lilllie)\nPent(adelle)\nGothic(adelle)\nPromulgate(adelle, lilllie)\nPalsy(adelle, lilllie)\nforall x (Palsy(x, adelle) and Palsy(adelle, lilllie) -> Crane(lilllie, adelle))\nforall x (Crane(x, adelle) -> Gothic(x))\n\nnot Promulgate(lilllie, lilllie)\n\nnot Promulgate(lilllie, lilllie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The nil is treacly. The nil derive the patrizia. The patrizia champ the nil. The patrizia is treacly. The patrizia is severe. The patrizia sway the nil. The patrizia derive the nil. If someone derive the patrizia and the patrizia derive the nil then the nil champ the patrizia. If someone champ the patrizia then they are severe. The nil is rough.", "logic": "\nTreacly(nil)\nDerive(nil, patrizia)\nChamp(patrizia, nil)\nTreacly(patrizia)\nSevere(patrizia)\nSway(patrizia, nil)\nDerive(patrizia, nil)\nforall x (Derive(x, patrizia) and Derive(patrizia, nil) -> Champ(nil, patrizia))\nforall x (Champ(x, patrizia) -> Severe(x))\n\nRough(nil)\n\nRough(nil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The engelbart is polyploid. The engelbart disprove the jorge. The jorge kibitz the engelbart. The jorge is polyploid. The jorge is steadied. The jorge symbolize the engelbart. The jorge disprove the engelbart. If someone disprove the jorge and the jorge disprove the engelbart then the engelbart kibitz the jorge. If someone kibitz the jorge then they are steadied. The engelbart does not need the jorge.", "logic": "\nPolyploid(engelbart)\nDisprove(engelbart, jorge)\nKibitz(jorge, engelbart)\nPolyploid(jorge)\nSteadied(jorge)\nSymbolize(jorge, engelbart)\nDisprove(jorge, engelbart)\nforall x (Disprove(x, jorge) and Disprove(jorge, engelbart) -> Kibitz(engelbart, jorge))\nforall x (Kibitz(x, jorge) -> Steadied(x))\n\nnot Symbolize(engelbart, jorge)\n\nnot Symbolize(engelbart, jorge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "The milena is maplelike. The milena behold the stevena. The stevena subtitle the milena. The stevena is maplelike. The stevena is empirical. The stevena urbanise the milena. The stevena behold the milena. If someone behold the stevena and the stevena behold the milena then the milena subtitle the stevena. If someone subtitle the stevena then they are empirical. The stevena is rough.", "logic": "\nMaplelike(milena)\nBehold(milena, stevena)\nSubtitle(stevena, milena)\nMaplelike(stevena)\nEmpirical(stevena)\nUrbanise(stevena, milena)\nBehold(stevena, milena)\nforall x (Behold(x, stevena) and Behold(stevena, milena) -> Subtitle(milena, stevena))\nforall x (Subtitle(x, stevena) -> Empirical(x))\n\nRough(stevena)\n\nRough(stevena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1517"} {"premises": "Ashby is braless. Manny is frisian. Manny is initiatory. Herb is not unpleasant. Herb is incidental. Herb is befogged. Prasun is not befogged. If Herb is footsure then Herb is initiatory. Kind things are footsure. Manny is frisian.", "logic": "\nBraless(ashby)\nFrisian(manny)\nInitiatory(manny)\nnot Unpleasant(herb)\nIncidental(herb)\nBefogged(herb)\nnot Befogged(prasun)\nFootsure(herb) -> Initiatory(herb)\nforall x (Befogged(x) -> Footsure(x))\n\nFrisian(manny)\n\ntherefore Frisian(manny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Mickie is gracious. Skyler is silent. Skyler is whimsical. Cherida is not horrified. Cherida is unshaped. Cherida is severe. Jaquelyn is not severe. If Cherida is unshoed then Cherida is whimsical. Kind things are unshoed. Jaquelyn is severe.", "logic": "\nGracious(mickie)\nSilent(skyler)\nWhimsical(skyler)\nnot Horrified(cherida)\nUnshaped(cherida)\nSevere(cherida)\nnot Severe(jaquelyn)\nUnshoed(cherida) -> Whimsical(cherida)\nforall x (Severe(x) -> Unshoed(x))\n\nSevere(jaquelyn)\n\ntherefore not Severe(jaquelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Blanche is unreserved. Skye is moronic. Skye is hurrying. Ninnetta is not hesitating. Ninnetta is yuman. Ninnetta is impervious. Binni is not impervious. If Ninnetta is isolating then Ninnetta is hurrying. Kind things are isolating. Ninnetta is isolating.", "logic": "\nUnreserved(blanche)\nMoronic(skye)\nHurrying(skye)\nnot Hesitating(ninnetta)\nYuman(ninnetta)\nImpervious(ninnetta)\nnot Impervious(binni)\nIsolating(ninnetta) -> Hurrying(ninnetta)\nforall x (Impervious(x) -> Isolating(x))\n\nIsolating(ninnetta)\n\nImpervious(ninnetta) and forall x (Impervious(x) -> Isolating(x)) -> therefore Isolating(ninnetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Blaine is drained. Bertrand is amuck. Bertrand is swampy. Ansel is not awned. Ansel is cuplike. Ansel is mucinous. Shurwood is not mucinous. If Ansel is thudding then Ansel is swampy. Kind things are thudding. Ansel is not thudding.", "logic": "\nDrained(blaine)\nAmuck(bertrand)\nSwampy(bertrand)\nnot Awned(ansel)\nCuplike(ansel)\nMucinous(ansel)\nnot Mucinous(shurwood)\nThudding(ansel) -> Swampy(ansel)\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Thudding(x))\n\nnot Thudding(ansel)\n\nMucinous(ansel) and forall x (Mucinous(x) -> Thudding(x)) -> therefore Thudding(ansel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Ehud is snuffly. Lynde is bated. Lynde is cycloidal. Corey is not scruffy. Corey is fingerlike. Corey is inspired. Faustina is not inspired. If Corey is nonviscid then Corey is cycloidal. Kind things are nonviscid. Corey is cycloidal.", "logic": "\nSnuffly(ehud)\nBated(lynde)\nCycloidal(lynde)\nnot Scruffy(corey)\nFingerlike(corey)\nInspired(corey)\nnot Inspired(faustina)\nNonviscid(corey) -> Cycloidal(corey)\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\n\nCycloidal(corey)\n\nInspired(corey) and forall x (Inspired(x) -> Nonviscid(x)) -> therefore Nonviscid(corey) Nonviscid(corey) and Nonviscid(corey) -> Cycloidal(corey) -> therefore Cycloidal(corey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Antonia is emblematic. Aretha is unspaced. Aretha is hilar. Lauri is not bilobate. Lauri is disastrous. Lauri is exoteric. Ishmael is not exoteric. If Lauri is fabulous then Lauri is hilar. Kind things are fabulous. Lauri is not hilar.", "logic": "\nEmblematic(antonia)\nUnspaced(aretha)\nHilar(aretha)\nnot Bilobate(lauri)\nDisastrous(lauri)\nExoteric(lauri)\nnot Exoteric(ishmael)\nFabulous(lauri) -> Hilar(lauri)\nforall x (Exoteric(x) -> Fabulous(x))\n\nnot Hilar(lauri)\n\nExoteric(lauri) and forall x (Exoteric(x) -> Fabulous(x)) -> therefore Fabulous(lauri) Fabulous(lauri) and Fabulous(lauri) -> Hilar(lauri) -> therefore Hilar(lauri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Rowland is chartered. Emmalee is persuasive. Emmalee is kinetic. Umeko is not quadruplex. Umeko is unplayful. Umeko is wrothful. Dimitrou is not wrothful. If Umeko is umbrageous then Umeko is kinetic. Kind things are umbrageous. Dimitrou is not umbrageous.", "logic": "\nChartered(rowland)\nPersuasive(emmalee)\nKinetic(emmalee)\nnot Quadruplex(umeko)\nUnplayful(umeko)\nWrothful(umeko)\nnot Wrothful(dimitrou)\nUmbrageous(umeko) -> Kinetic(umeko)\nforall x (Wrothful(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\n\nnot Umbrageous(dimitrou)\n\nforall x (Wrothful(x) -> Umbrageous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Alejandra is antsy. Hanford is civic. Hanford is dyspeptic. Dori is not raftered. Dori is neural. Dori is belted. Walden is not belted. If Dori is graven then Dori is dyspeptic. Kind things are graven. Hanford is graven.", "logic": "\nAntsy(alejandra)\nCivic(hanford)\nDyspeptic(hanford)\nnot Raftered(dori)\nNeural(dori)\nBelted(dori)\nnot Belted(walden)\nGraven(dori) -> Dyspeptic(dori)\nforall x (Belted(x) -> Graven(x))\n\nGraven(hanford)\n\nforall x (Belted(x) -> Graven(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Wilden is afeard. Aurilia is treacly. Aurilia is boronic. Ingamar is not manly. Ingamar is appraising. Ingamar is apposable. Becky is not apposable. If Ingamar is unannealed then Ingamar is boronic. Kind things are unannealed. Wilden is not unannealed.", "logic": "\nAfeard(wilden)\nTreacly(aurilia)\nBoronic(aurilia)\nnot Manly(ingamar)\nAppraising(ingamar)\nApposable(ingamar)\nnot Apposable(becky)\nUnannealed(ingamar) -> Boronic(ingamar)\nforall x (Apposable(x) -> Unannealed(x))\n\nnot Unannealed(wilden)\n\nforall x (Apposable(x) -> Unannealed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Axel is antenatal. Neale is fiducial. Neale is bilocular. Gordie is not fruitful. Gordie is cushiony. Gordie is prostate. Ebonee is not prostate. If Gordie is jesuit then Gordie is bilocular. Kind things are jesuit. Gordie is antenatal.", "logic": "\nAntenatal(axel)\nFiducial(neale)\nBilocular(neale)\nnot Fruitful(gordie)\nCushiony(gordie)\nProstate(gordie)\nnot Prostate(ebonee)\nJesuit(gordie) -> Bilocular(gordie)\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> Jesuit(x))\n\nAntenatal(gordie)\n\nAntenatal(gordie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Annaliese is bracted. Rodolphe is worldly. Rodolphe is accoutred. Rhodie is not driven. Rhodie is fired. Rhodie is pillared. Fonzie is not pillared. If Rhodie is babyish then Rhodie is accoutred. Kind things are babyish. Annaliese is not worldly.", "logic": "\nBracted(annaliese)\nWorldly(rodolphe)\nAccoutred(rodolphe)\nnot Driven(rhodie)\nFired(rhodie)\nPillared(rhodie)\nnot Pillared(fonzie)\nBabyish(rhodie) -> Accoutred(rhodie)\nforall x (Pillared(x) -> Babyish(x))\n\nnot Worldly(annaliese)\n\nnot Worldly(annaliese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Cristal is bolometric. Samara is vexatious. Samara is phantasmal. Guy is not coetaneous. Guy is unlikeable. Guy is pantropic. Olia is not pantropic. If Guy is rhymed then Guy is phantasmal. Kind things are rhymed. Olia is phantasmal.", "logic": "\nBolometric(cristal)\nVexatious(samara)\nPhantasmal(samara)\nnot Coetaneous(guy)\nUnlikeable(guy)\nPantropic(guy)\nnot Pantropic(olia)\nRhymed(guy) -> Phantasmal(guy)\nforall x (Pantropic(x) -> Rhymed(x))\n\nPhantasmal(olia)\n\nPhantasmal(olia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-252"} {"premises": "Barry is well. Nena is steroidal. Mason is slippy. All well, fictitious people are steroidal. If someone is slippy and running then they are fictitious. Nice, slippy people are well. If Nena is slippy and Nena is fictitious then Nena is brazilian. If Barry is well then Barry is fictitious. All steroidal, well people are brazilian. If Mason is running and Mason is brazilian then Mason is blinded. White, slippy people are blinded. Nena is steroidal.", "logic": "\nWell(barry)\nSteroidal(nena)\nSlippy(mason)\nforall x (Well(x) and Fictitious(x) -> Steroidal(x))\nforall x (Slippy(x) and Running(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nforall x (Fictitious(x) and Slippy(x) -> Well(x))\nSlippy(nena) and Fictitious(nena) -> Brazilian(nena)\nWell(barry) -> Fictitious(barry)\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Well(x) -> Brazilian(x))\nRunning(mason) and Brazilian(mason) -> Blinded(mason)\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Slippy(x) -> Blinded(x))\n\nSteroidal(nena)\n\ntherefore Steroidal(nena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Rosita is celebrated. Noel is minute. Lukas is unfading. All celebrated, tempting people are minute. If someone is unfading and strained then they are tempting. Nice, unfading people are celebrated. If Noel is unfading and Noel is tempting then Noel is uncensored. If Rosita is celebrated then Rosita is tempting. All minute, celebrated people are uncensored. If Lukas is strained and Lukas is uncensored then Lukas is loving. White, unfading people are loving. Lukas is not unfading.", "logic": "\nCelebrated(rosita)\nMinute(noel)\nUnfading(lukas)\nforall x (Celebrated(x) and Tempting(x) -> Minute(x))\nforall x (Unfading(x) and Strained(x) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Tempting(x) and Unfading(x) -> Celebrated(x))\nUnfading(noel) and Tempting(noel) -> Uncensored(noel)\nCelebrated(rosita) -> Tempting(rosita)\nforall x (Minute(x) and Celebrated(x) -> Uncensored(x))\nStrained(lukas) and Uncensored(lukas) -> Loving(lukas)\nforall x (Minute(x) and Unfading(x) -> Loving(x))\n\nnot Unfading(lukas)\n\ntherefore Unfading(lukas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Patric is impersonal. Mara is belemnitic. Sibby is fagged. All impersonal, aftermost people are belemnitic. If someone is fagged and anopheline then they are aftermost. Nice, fagged people are impersonal. If Mara is fagged and Mara is aftermost then Mara is becalmed. If Patric is impersonal then Patric is aftermost. All belemnitic, impersonal people are becalmed. If Sibby is anopheline and Sibby is becalmed then Sibby is eritrean. White, fagged people are eritrean. Patric is aftermost.", "logic": "\nImpersonal(patric)\nBelemnitic(mara)\nFagged(sibby)\nforall x (Impersonal(x) and Aftermost(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\nforall x (Fagged(x) and Anopheline(x) -> Aftermost(x))\nforall x (Aftermost(x) and Fagged(x) -> Impersonal(x))\nFagged(mara) and Aftermost(mara) -> Becalmed(mara)\nImpersonal(patric) -> Aftermost(patric)\nforall x (Belemnitic(x) and Impersonal(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nAnopheline(sibby) and Becalmed(sibby) -> Eritrean(sibby)\nforall x (Belemnitic(x) and Fagged(x) -> Eritrean(x))\n\nAftermost(patric)\n\nImpersonal(patric) and Impersonal(patric) -> Aftermost(patric) -> therefore Aftermost(patric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Shelton is unsociable. Allegra is fernlike. Bonnee is dimorphic. All unsociable, absorbent people are fernlike. If someone is dimorphic and sinful then they are absorbent. Nice, dimorphic people are unsociable. If Allegra is dimorphic and Allegra is absorbent then Allegra is shot. If Shelton is unsociable then Shelton is absorbent. All fernlike, unsociable people are shot. If Bonnee is sinful and Bonnee is shot then Bonnee is flash. White, dimorphic people are flash. Shelton is not absorbent.", "logic": "\nUnsociable(shelton)\nFernlike(allegra)\nDimorphic(bonnee)\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Absorbent(x) -> Fernlike(x))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and Sinful(x) -> Absorbent(x))\nforall x (Absorbent(x) and Dimorphic(x) -> Unsociable(x))\nDimorphic(allegra) and Absorbent(allegra) -> Shot(allegra)\nUnsociable(shelton) -> Absorbent(shelton)\nforall x (Fernlike(x) and Unsociable(x) -> Shot(x))\nSinful(bonnee) and Shot(bonnee) -> Flash(bonnee)\nforall x (Fernlike(x) and Dimorphic(x) -> Flash(x))\n\nnot Absorbent(shelton)\n\nUnsociable(shelton) and Unsociable(shelton) -> Absorbent(shelton) -> therefore Absorbent(shelton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Bell is spiked. Carilyn is matte. Tabbatha is cambial. All spiked, telescoped people are matte. If someone is cambial and maniac then they are telescoped. Nice, cambial people are spiked. If Carilyn is cambial and Carilyn is telescoped then Carilyn is cotyloid. If Bell is spiked then Bell is telescoped. All matte, spiked people are cotyloid. If Tabbatha is maniac and Tabbatha is cotyloid then Tabbatha is boughed. White, cambial people are boughed. Bell is matte.", "logic": "\nSpiked(bell)\nMatte(carilyn)\nCambial(tabbatha)\nforall x (Spiked(x) and Telescoped(x) -> Matte(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Maniac(x) -> Telescoped(x))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) and Cambial(x) -> Spiked(x))\nCambial(carilyn) and Telescoped(carilyn) -> Cotyloid(carilyn)\nSpiked(bell) -> Telescoped(bell)\nforall x (Matte(x) and Spiked(x) -> Cotyloid(x))\nManiac(tabbatha) and Cotyloid(tabbatha) -> Boughed(tabbatha)\nforall x (Matte(x) and Cambial(x) -> Boughed(x))\n\nMatte(bell)\n\nSpiked(bell) and Spiked(bell) -> Telescoped(bell) -> therefore Telescoped(bell) Spiked(bell) and Telescoped(bell) and forall x (Spiked(x) and Telescoped(x) -> Matte(x)) -> therefore Matte(bell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Lemar is papery. Raychel is upset. Chane is protected. All papery, rapturous people are upset. If someone is protected and radio then they are rapturous. Nice, protected people are papery. If Raychel is protected and Raychel is rapturous then Raychel is polynomial. If Lemar is papery then Lemar is rapturous. All upset, papery people are polynomial. If Chane is radio and Chane is polynomial then Chane is neritic. White, protected people are neritic. Lemar is not upset.", "logic": "\nPapery(lemar)\nUpset(raychel)\nProtected(chane)\nforall x (Papery(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Upset(x))\nforall x (Protected(x) and Radio(x) -> Rapturous(x))\nforall x (Rapturous(x) and Protected(x) -> Papery(x))\nProtected(raychel) and Rapturous(raychel) -> Polynomial(raychel)\nPapery(lemar) -> Rapturous(lemar)\nforall x (Upset(x) and Papery(x) -> Polynomial(x))\nRadio(chane) and Polynomial(chane) -> Neritic(chane)\nforall x (Upset(x) and Protected(x) -> Neritic(x))\n\nnot Upset(lemar)\n\nPapery(lemar) and Papery(lemar) -> Rapturous(lemar) -> therefore Rapturous(lemar) Papery(lemar) and Rapturous(lemar) and forall x (Papery(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Upset(x)) -> therefore Upset(lemar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Gerri is starchy. Samuele is measurable. Madalyn is wraithlike. All starchy, sodding people are measurable. If someone is wraithlike and beneficial then they are sodding. Nice, wraithlike people are starchy. If Samuele is wraithlike and Samuele is sodding then Samuele is amnestic. If Gerri is starchy then Gerri is sodding. All measurable, starchy people are amnestic. If Madalyn is beneficial and Madalyn is amnestic then Madalyn is woodsy. White, wraithlike people are woodsy. Madalyn is not starchy.", "logic": "\nStarchy(gerri)\nMeasurable(samuele)\nWraithlike(madalyn)\nforall x (Starchy(x) and Sodding(x) -> Measurable(x))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) and Beneficial(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Wraithlike(x) -> Starchy(x))\nWraithlike(samuele) and Sodding(samuele) -> Amnestic(samuele)\nStarchy(gerri) -> Sodding(gerri)\nforall x (Measurable(x) and Starchy(x) -> Amnestic(x))\nBeneficial(madalyn) and Amnestic(madalyn) -> Woodsy(madalyn)\nforall x (Measurable(x) and Wraithlike(x) -> Woodsy(x))\n\nnot Starchy(madalyn)\n\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Wraithlike(x) -> Starchy(x)) <- forall x (Wraithlike(x) and Beneficial(x) -> Sodding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Marje is federate. Marya is xxii. Englebert is taoist. All federate, incorrect people are xxii. If someone is taoist and proficient then they are incorrect. Nice, taoist people are federate. If Marya is taoist and Marya is incorrect then Marya is rustic. If Marje is federate then Marje is incorrect. All xxii, federate people are rustic. If Englebert is proficient and Englebert is rustic then Englebert is aerobic. White, taoist people are aerobic. Englebert is rustic.", "logic": "\nFederate(marje)\nXxii(marya)\nTaoist(englebert)\nforall x (Federate(x) and Incorrect(x) -> Xxii(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) and Proficient(x) -> Incorrect(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and Taoist(x) -> Federate(x))\nTaoist(marya) and Incorrect(marya) -> Rustic(marya)\nFederate(marje) -> Incorrect(marje)\nforall x (Xxii(x) and Federate(x) -> Rustic(x))\nProficient(englebert) and Rustic(englebert) -> Aerobic(englebert)\nforall x (Xxii(x) and Taoist(x) -> Aerobic(x))\n\nRustic(englebert)\n\nforall x (Xxii(x) and Federate(x) -> Rustic(x)) <- forall x (Federate(x) and Incorrect(x) -> Xxii(x)) <- forall x (Taoist(x) and Proficient(x) -> Incorrect(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Quincey is scabby. Darrick is brash. Opalina is penniless. All scabby, myoid people are brash. If someone is penniless and columbian then they are myoid. Nice, penniless people are scabby. If Darrick is penniless and Darrick is myoid then Darrick is dysplastic. If Quincey is scabby then Quincey is myoid. All brash, scabby people are dysplastic. If Opalina is columbian and Opalina is dysplastic then Opalina is reported. White, penniless people are reported. Darrick is not scabby.", "logic": "\nScabby(quincey)\nBrash(darrick)\nPenniless(opalina)\nforall x (Scabby(x) and Myoid(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Penniless(x) and Columbian(x) -> Myoid(x))\nforall x (Myoid(x) and Penniless(x) -> Scabby(x))\nPenniless(darrick) and Myoid(darrick) -> Dysplastic(darrick)\nScabby(quincey) -> Myoid(quincey)\nforall x (Brash(x) and Scabby(x) -> Dysplastic(x))\nColumbian(opalina) and Dysplastic(opalina) -> Reported(opalina)\nforall x (Brash(x) and Penniless(x) -> Reported(x))\n\nnot Scabby(darrick)\n\nforall x (Myoid(x) and Penniless(x) -> Scabby(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Beryl is boytrose. Briteny is vertebral. Gillan is kaput. All boytrose, vanilla people are vertebral. If someone is kaput and egotistic then they are vanilla. Nice, kaput people are boytrose. If Briteny is kaput and Briteny is vanilla then Briteny is burled. If Beryl is boytrose then Beryl is vanilla. All vertebral, boytrose people are burled. If Gillan is egotistic and Gillan is burled then Gillan is negotiable. White, kaput people are negotiable. Briteny is kaput.", "logic": "\nBoytrose(beryl)\nVertebral(briteny)\nKaput(gillan)\nforall x (Boytrose(x) and Vanilla(x) -> Vertebral(x))\nforall x (Kaput(x) and Egotistic(x) -> Vanilla(x))\nforall x (Vanilla(x) and Kaput(x) -> Boytrose(x))\nKaput(briteny) and Vanilla(briteny) -> Burled(briteny)\nBoytrose(beryl) -> Vanilla(beryl)\nforall x (Vertebral(x) and Boytrose(x) -> Burled(x))\nEgotistic(gillan) and Burled(gillan) -> Negotiable(gillan)\nforall x (Vertebral(x) and Kaput(x) -> Negotiable(x))\n\nKaput(briteny)\n\nKaput(briteny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Barty is unsorted. Dinah is addled. Saxe is saved. All unsorted, jesuit people are addled. If someone is saved and stovepiped then they are jesuit. Nice, saved people are unsorted. If Dinah is saved and Dinah is jesuit then Dinah is sheetlike. If Barty is unsorted then Barty is jesuit. All addled, unsorted people are sheetlike. If Saxe is stovepiped and Saxe is sheetlike then Saxe is used. White, saved people are used. Saxe is not stovepiped.", "logic": "\nUnsorted(barty)\nAddled(dinah)\nSaved(saxe)\nforall x (Unsorted(x) and Jesuit(x) -> Addled(x))\nforall x (Saved(x) and Stovepiped(x) -> Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) and Saved(x) -> Unsorted(x))\nSaved(dinah) and Jesuit(dinah) -> Sheetlike(dinah)\nUnsorted(barty) -> Jesuit(barty)\nforall x (Addled(x) and Unsorted(x) -> Sheetlike(x))\nStovepiped(saxe) and Sheetlike(saxe) -> Used(saxe)\nforall x (Addled(x) and Saved(x) -> Used(x))\n\nnot Stovepiped(saxe)\n\nnot Stovepiped(saxe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "Idalia is reentrant. Katherina is uninvolved. Bessy is excusatory. All reentrant, elfin people are uninvolved. If someone is excusatory and plantar then they are elfin. Nice, excusatory people are reentrant. If Katherina is excusatory and Katherina is elfin then Katherina is tzarist. If Idalia is reentrant then Idalia is elfin. All uninvolved, reentrant people are tzarist. If Bessy is plantar and Bessy is tzarist then Bessy is mass. White, excusatory people are mass. Katherina is plantar.", "logic": "\nReentrant(idalia)\nUninvolved(katherina)\nExcusatory(bessy)\nforall x (Reentrant(x) and Elfin(x) -> Uninvolved(x))\nforall x (Excusatory(x) and Plantar(x) -> Elfin(x))\nforall x (Elfin(x) and Excusatory(x) -> Reentrant(x))\nExcusatory(katherina) and Elfin(katherina) -> Tzarist(katherina)\nReentrant(idalia) -> Elfin(idalia)\nforall x (Uninvolved(x) and Reentrant(x) -> Tzarist(x))\nPlantar(bessy) and Tzarist(bessy) -> Mass(bessy)\nforall x (Uninvolved(x) and Excusatory(x) -> Mass(x))\n\nPlantar(katherina)\n\nPlantar(katherina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2029"} {"premises": "The ulick is not fanciful. The ulick accent the shelbi. The ulick undergo the lorelei. The lorelei accent the ulick. The lorelei accent the shelbi. The shelbi is not biconvex. The shelbi accent the lorelei. If something is peptic and it undergo the lorelei then the lorelei is peptic. If something undergo the shelbi and it is fake then the shelbi is not peptic. If something accent the lorelei and the lorelei accent the shelbi then the shelbi slacken the ulick. If something slacken the lorelei and the lorelei is not biconvex then the lorelei slacken the ulick. If the lorelei slacken the ulick and the lorelei slacken the shelbi then the lorelei is roughhewn. If something slacken the ulick then the ulick slacken the lorelei. If the shelbi is not peptic then the shelbi does not chase the lorelei. If something slacken the ulick then the ulick slacken the shelbi. The lorelei accent the ulick.", "logic": "\nnot Fanciful(ulick)\nAccent(ulick, shelbi)\nUndergo(ulick, lorelei)\nAccent(lorelei, ulick)\nAccent(lorelei, shelbi)\nnot Biconvex(shelbi)\nAccent(shelbi, lorelei)\nforall x (Peptic(x) and Undergo(x, lorelei) -> Peptic(lorelei))\nforall x (Undergo(x, shelbi) and Fake(x) -> not Peptic(shelbi))\nforall x (Accent(x, lorelei) and Accent(lorelei, shelbi) -> Slacken(shelbi, ulick))\nforall x (Slacken(x, lorelei) and not Biconvex(lorelei) -> Slacken(lorelei, ulick))\nSlacken(lorelei, ulick) and Slacken(lorelei, shelbi) -> Roughhewn(lorelei)\nforall x (Slacken(x, ulick) -> Slacken(ulick, lorelei))\nnot Peptic(shelbi) -> not Slacken(shelbi, lorelei)\nforall x (Slacken(x, ulick) -> Slacken(ulick, shelbi))\n\nAccent(lorelei, ulick)\n\ntherefore Accent(lorelei, ulick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The athene is not thrillful. The athene burble the berri. The athene enthrone the rainer. The rainer burble the athene. The rainer burble the berri. The berri is not cormous. The berri burble the rainer. If something is shriveled and it enthrone the rainer then the rainer is shriveled. If something enthrone the berri and it is testicular then the berri is not shriveled. If something burble the rainer and the rainer burble the berri then the berri mutilate the athene. If something mutilate the rainer and the rainer is not cormous then the rainer mutilate the athene. If the rainer mutilate the athene and the rainer mutilate the berri then the rainer is pervasive. If something mutilate the athene then the athene mutilate the rainer. If the berri is not shriveled then the berri does not chase the rainer. If something mutilate the athene then the athene mutilate the berri. The berri does not like the rainer.", "logic": "\nnot Thrillful(athene)\nBurble(athene, berri)\nEnthrone(athene, rainer)\nBurble(rainer, athene)\nBurble(rainer, berri)\nnot Cormous(berri)\nBurble(berri, rainer)\nforall x (Shriveled(x) and Enthrone(x, rainer) -> Shriveled(rainer))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, berri) and Testicular(x) -> not Shriveled(berri))\nforall x (Burble(x, rainer) and Burble(rainer, berri) -> Mutilate(berri, athene))\nforall x (Mutilate(x, rainer) and not Cormous(rainer) -> Mutilate(rainer, athene))\nMutilate(rainer, athene) and Mutilate(rainer, berri) -> Pervasive(rainer)\nforall x (Mutilate(x, athene) -> Mutilate(athene, rainer))\nnot Shriveled(berri) -> not Mutilate(berri, rainer)\nforall x (Mutilate(x, athene) -> Mutilate(athene, berri))\n\nnot Burble(berri, rainer)\n\ntherefore Burble(berri, rainer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The warner is not phyletic. The warner erode the jessie. The warner antedate the leonelle. The leonelle erode the warner. The leonelle erode the jessie. The jessie is not open. The jessie erode the leonelle. If something is dishy and it antedate the leonelle then the leonelle is dishy. If something antedate the jessie and it is scrabbly then the jessie is not dishy. If something erode the leonelle and the leonelle erode the jessie then the jessie obsess the warner. If something obsess the leonelle and the leonelle is not open then the leonelle obsess the warner. If the leonelle obsess the warner and the leonelle obsess the jessie then the leonelle is winless. If something obsess the warner then the warner obsess the leonelle. If the jessie is not dishy then the jessie does not chase the leonelle. If something obsess the warner then the warner obsess the jessie. The jessie obsess the warner.", "logic": "\nnot Phyletic(warner)\nErode(warner, jessie)\nAntedate(warner, leonelle)\nErode(leonelle, warner)\nErode(leonelle, jessie)\nnot Open(jessie)\nErode(jessie, leonelle)\nforall x (Dishy(x) and Antedate(x, leonelle) -> Dishy(leonelle))\nforall x (Antedate(x, jessie) and Scrabbly(x) -> not Dishy(jessie))\nforall x (Erode(x, leonelle) and Erode(leonelle, jessie) -> Obsess(jessie, warner))\nforall x (Obsess(x, leonelle) and not Open(leonelle) -> Obsess(leonelle, warner))\nObsess(leonelle, warner) and Obsess(leonelle, jessie) -> Winless(leonelle)\nforall x (Obsess(x, warner) -> Obsess(warner, leonelle))\nnot Dishy(jessie) -> not Obsess(jessie, leonelle)\nforall x (Obsess(x, warner) -> Obsess(warner, jessie))\n\nObsess(jessie, warner)\n\nErode(jessie, leonelle) and Erode(leonelle, jessie) and forall x (Erode(x, leonelle) and Erode(leonelle, jessie) -> Obsess(jessie, warner)) -> therefore Obsess(jessie, warner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The vonny is not meditative. The vonny couple the melina. The vonny crisp the kirk. The kirk couple the vonny. The kirk couple the melina. The melina is not sonic. The melina couple the kirk. If something is retrousse and it crisp the kirk then the kirk is retrousse. If something crisp the melina and it is scrimpy then the melina is not retrousse. If something couple the kirk and the kirk couple the melina then the melina board the vonny. If something board the kirk and the kirk is not sonic then the kirk board the vonny. If the kirk board the vonny and the kirk board the melina then the kirk is neurotic. If something board the vonny then the vonny board the kirk. If the melina is not retrousse then the melina does not chase the kirk. If something board the vonny then the vonny board the melina. The melina does not chase the vonny.", "logic": "\nnot Meditative(vonny)\nCouple(vonny, melina)\nCrisp(vonny, kirk)\nCouple(kirk, vonny)\nCouple(kirk, melina)\nnot Sonic(melina)\nCouple(melina, kirk)\nforall x (Retrousse(x) and Crisp(x, kirk) -> Retrousse(kirk))\nforall x (Crisp(x, melina) and Scrimpy(x) -> not Retrousse(melina))\nforall x (Couple(x, kirk) and Couple(kirk, melina) -> Board(melina, vonny))\nforall x (Board(x, kirk) and not Sonic(kirk) -> Board(kirk, vonny))\nBoard(kirk, vonny) and Board(kirk, melina) -> Neurotic(kirk)\nforall x (Board(x, vonny) -> Board(vonny, kirk))\nnot Retrousse(melina) -> not Board(melina, kirk)\nforall x (Board(x, vonny) -> Board(vonny, melina))\n\nnot Board(melina, vonny)\n\nCouple(melina, kirk) and Couple(kirk, melina) and forall x (Couple(x, kirk) and Couple(kirk, melina) -> Board(melina, vonny)) -> therefore Board(melina, vonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The faunie is not triassic. The faunie lipread the theodosia. The faunie stare the eldon. The eldon lipread the faunie. The eldon lipread the theodosia. The theodosia is not myriad. The theodosia lipread the eldon. If something is unfixed and it stare the eldon then the eldon is unfixed. If something stare the theodosia and it is biggish then the theodosia is not unfixed. If something lipread the eldon and the eldon lipread the theodosia then the theodosia wash the faunie. If something wash the eldon and the eldon is not myriad then the eldon wash the faunie. If the eldon wash the faunie and the eldon wash the theodosia then the eldon is mitigated. If something wash the faunie then the faunie wash the eldon. If the theodosia is not unfixed then the theodosia does not chase the eldon. If something wash the faunie then the faunie wash the theodosia. The faunie wash the theodosia.", "logic": "\nnot Triassic(faunie)\nLipread(faunie, theodosia)\nStare(faunie, eldon)\nLipread(eldon, faunie)\nLipread(eldon, theodosia)\nnot Myriad(theodosia)\nLipread(theodosia, eldon)\nforall x (Unfixed(x) and Stare(x, eldon) -> Unfixed(eldon))\nforall x (Stare(x, theodosia) and Biggish(x) -> not Unfixed(theodosia))\nforall x (Lipread(x, eldon) and Lipread(eldon, theodosia) -> Wash(theodosia, faunie))\nforall x (Wash(x, eldon) and not Myriad(eldon) -> Wash(eldon, faunie))\nWash(eldon, faunie) and Wash(eldon, theodosia) -> Mitigated(eldon)\nforall x (Wash(x, faunie) -> Wash(faunie, eldon))\nnot Unfixed(theodosia) -> not Wash(theodosia, eldon)\nforall x (Wash(x, faunie) -> Wash(faunie, theodosia))\n\nWash(faunie, theodosia)\n\nLipread(theodosia, eldon) and Lipread(eldon, theodosia) and forall x (Lipread(x, eldon) and Lipread(eldon, theodosia) -> Wash(theodosia, faunie)) -> therefore Wash(theodosia, faunie) Wash(theodosia, faunie) and forall x (Wash(x, faunie) -> Wash(faunie, theodosia)) -> therefore Wash(faunie, theodosia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The terrie is not reformed. The terrie grass the dee. The terrie aurify the dehlia. The dehlia grass the terrie. The dehlia grass the dee. The dee is not unordered. The dee grass the dehlia. If something is catarrhal and it aurify the dehlia then the dehlia is catarrhal. If something aurify the dee and it is lettered then the dee is not catarrhal. If something grass the dehlia and the dehlia grass the dee then the dee blotch the terrie. If something blotch the dehlia and the dehlia is not unordered then the dehlia blotch the terrie. If the dehlia blotch the terrie and the dehlia blotch the dee then the dehlia is angular. If something blotch the terrie then the terrie blotch the dehlia. If the dee is not catarrhal then the dee does not chase the dehlia. If something blotch the terrie then the terrie blotch the dee. The terrie does not chase the dehlia.", "logic": "\nnot Reformed(terrie)\nGrass(terrie, dee)\nAurify(terrie, dehlia)\nGrass(dehlia, terrie)\nGrass(dehlia, dee)\nnot Unordered(dee)\nGrass(dee, dehlia)\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) and Aurify(x, dehlia) -> Catarrhal(dehlia))\nforall x (Aurify(x, dee) and Lettered(x) -> not Catarrhal(dee))\nforall x (Grass(x, dehlia) and Grass(dehlia, dee) -> Blotch(dee, terrie))\nforall x (Blotch(x, dehlia) and not Unordered(dehlia) -> Blotch(dehlia, terrie))\nBlotch(dehlia, terrie) and Blotch(dehlia, dee) -> Angular(dehlia)\nforall x (Blotch(x, terrie) -> Blotch(terrie, dehlia))\nnot Catarrhal(dee) -> not Blotch(dee, dehlia)\nforall x (Blotch(x, terrie) -> Blotch(terrie, dee))\n\nnot Blotch(terrie, dehlia)\n\nGrass(dee, dehlia) and Grass(dehlia, dee) and forall x (Grass(x, dehlia) and Grass(dehlia, dee) -> Blotch(dee, terrie)) -> therefore Blotch(dee, terrie) Blotch(dee, terrie) and forall x (Blotch(x, terrie) -> Blotch(terrie, dehlia)) -> therefore Blotch(terrie, dehlia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The hansel is not haitian. The hansel degrease the meggy. The hansel appeal the roseanna. The roseanna degrease the hansel. The roseanna degrease the meggy. The meggy is not normative. The meggy degrease the roseanna. If something is homebound and it appeal the roseanna then the roseanna is homebound. If something appeal the meggy and it is impaired then the meggy is not homebound. If something degrease the roseanna and the roseanna degrease the meggy then the meggy travesty the hansel. If something travesty the roseanna and the roseanna is not normative then the roseanna travesty the hansel. If the roseanna travesty the hansel and the roseanna travesty the meggy then the roseanna is newfound. If something travesty the hansel then the hansel travesty the roseanna. If the meggy is not homebound then the meggy does not chase the roseanna. If something travesty the hansel then the hansel travesty the meggy. The roseanna does not chase the hansel.", "logic": "\nnot Haitian(hansel)\nDegrease(hansel, meggy)\nAppeal(hansel, roseanna)\nDegrease(roseanna, hansel)\nDegrease(roseanna, meggy)\nnot Normative(meggy)\nDegrease(meggy, roseanna)\nforall x (Homebound(x) and Appeal(x, roseanna) -> Homebound(roseanna))\nforall x (Appeal(x, meggy) and Impaired(x) -> not Homebound(meggy))\nforall x (Degrease(x, roseanna) and Degrease(roseanna, meggy) -> Travesty(meggy, hansel))\nforall x (Travesty(x, roseanna) and not Normative(roseanna) -> Travesty(roseanna, hansel))\nTravesty(roseanna, hansel) and Travesty(roseanna, meggy) -> Newfound(roseanna)\nforall x (Travesty(x, hansel) -> Travesty(hansel, roseanna))\nnot Homebound(meggy) -> not Travesty(meggy, roseanna)\nforall x (Travesty(x, hansel) -> Travesty(hansel, meggy))\n\nnot Travesty(roseanna, hansel)\n\nforall x (Travesty(x, roseanna) and not Normative(roseanna) -> Travesty(roseanna, hansel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The margery is not morbific. The margery embargo the harrison. The margery gape the adah. The adah embargo the margery. The adah embargo the harrison. The harrison is not cultivable. The harrison embargo the adah. If something is centroidal and it gape the adah then the adah is centroidal. If something gape the harrison and it is oval then the harrison is not centroidal. If something embargo the adah and the adah embargo the harrison then the harrison behold the margery. If something behold the adah and the adah is not cultivable then the adah behold the margery. If the adah behold the margery and the adah behold the harrison then the adah is daft. If something behold the margery then the margery behold the adah. If the harrison is not centroidal then the harrison does not chase the adah. If something behold the margery then the margery behold the harrison. The adah is centroidal.", "logic": "\nnot Morbific(margery)\nEmbargo(margery, harrison)\nGape(margery, adah)\nEmbargo(adah, margery)\nEmbargo(adah, harrison)\nnot Cultivable(harrison)\nEmbargo(harrison, adah)\nforall x (Centroidal(x) and Gape(x, adah) -> Centroidal(adah))\nforall x (Gape(x, harrison) and Oval(x) -> not Centroidal(harrison))\nforall x (Embargo(x, adah) and Embargo(adah, harrison) -> Behold(harrison, margery))\nforall x (Behold(x, adah) and not Cultivable(adah) -> Behold(adah, margery))\nBehold(adah, margery) and Behold(adah, harrison) -> Daft(adah)\nforall x (Behold(x, margery) -> Behold(margery, adah))\nnot Centroidal(harrison) -> not Behold(harrison, adah)\nforall x (Behold(x, margery) -> Behold(margery, harrison))\n\nCentroidal(adah)\n\nforall x (Centroidal(x) and Gape(x, adah) -> Centroidal(adah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The lissy is not metallic. The lissy brooch the ellis. The lissy bombilate the ajai. The ajai brooch the lissy. The ajai brooch the ellis. The ellis is not beetling. The ellis brooch the ajai. If something is calceolate and it bombilate the ajai then the ajai is calceolate. If something bombilate the ellis and it is fuscous then the ellis is not calceolate. If something brooch the ajai and the ajai brooch the ellis then the ellis pressurise the lissy. If something pressurise the ajai and the ajai is not beetling then the ajai pressurise the lissy. If the ajai pressurise the lissy and the ajai pressurise the ellis then the ajai is undefined. If something pressurise the lissy then the lissy pressurise the ajai. If the ellis is not calceolate then the ellis does not chase the ajai. If something pressurise the lissy then the lissy pressurise the ellis. The ajai is not undefined.", "logic": "\nnot Metallic(lissy)\nBrooch(lissy, ellis)\nBombilate(lissy, ajai)\nBrooch(ajai, lissy)\nBrooch(ajai, ellis)\nnot Beetling(ellis)\nBrooch(ellis, ajai)\nforall x (Calceolate(x) and Bombilate(x, ajai) -> Calceolate(ajai))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, ellis) and Fuscous(x) -> not Calceolate(ellis))\nforall x (Brooch(x, ajai) and Brooch(ajai, ellis) -> Pressurise(ellis, lissy))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, ajai) and not Beetling(ajai) -> Pressurise(ajai, lissy))\nPressurise(ajai, lissy) and Pressurise(ajai, ellis) -> Undefined(ajai)\nforall x (Pressurise(x, lissy) -> Pressurise(lissy, ajai))\nnot Calceolate(ellis) -> not Pressurise(ellis, ajai)\nforall x (Pressurise(x, lissy) -> Pressurise(lissy, ellis))\n\nnot Undefined(ajai)\n\nPressurise(ajai, lissy) and Pressurise(ajai, ellis) -> Undefined(ajai) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The willa is not mitigable. The willa baffle the drea. The willa inweave the shandee. The shandee baffle the willa. The shandee baffle the drea. The drea is not cytolytic. The drea baffle the shandee. If something is bardic and it inweave the shandee then the shandee is bardic. If something inweave the drea and it is fascistic then the drea is not bardic. If something baffle the shandee and the shandee baffle the drea then the drea understock the willa. If something understock the shandee and the shandee is not cytolytic then the shandee understock the willa. If the shandee understock the willa and the shandee understock the drea then the shandee is premature. If something understock the willa then the willa understock the shandee. If the drea is not bardic then the drea does not chase the shandee. If something understock the willa then the willa understock the drea. The shandee is mitigable.", "logic": "\nnot Mitigable(willa)\nBaffle(willa, drea)\nInweave(willa, shandee)\nBaffle(shandee, willa)\nBaffle(shandee, drea)\nnot Cytolytic(drea)\nBaffle(drea, shandee)\nforall x (Bardic(x) and Inweave(x, shandee) -> Bardic(shandee))\nforall x (Inweave(x, drea) and Fascistic(x) -> not Bardic(drea))\nforall x (Baffle(x, shandee) and Baffle(shandee, drea) -> Understock(drea, willa))\nforall x (Understock(x, shandee) and not Cytolytic(shandee) -> Understock(shandee, willa))\nUnderstock(shandee, willa) and Understock(shandee, drea) -> Premature(shandee)\nforall x (Understock(x, willa) -> Understock(willa, shandee))\nnot Bardic(drea) -> not Understock(drea, shandee)\nforall x (Understock(x, willa) -> Understock(willa, drea))\n\nMitigable(shandee)\n\nMitigable(shandee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The giacinta is not postictal. The giacinta possess the guillaume. The giacinta carbonise the ransom. The ransom possess the giacinta. The ransom possess the guillaume. The guillaume is not copulatory. The guillaume possess the ransom. If something is semiweekly and it carbonise the ransom then the ransom is semiweekly. If something carbonise the guillaume and it is twisting then the guillaume is not semiweekly. If something possess the ransom and the ransom possess the guillaume then the guillaume empathise the giacinta. If something empathise the ransom and the ransom is not copulatory then the ransom empathise the giacinta. If the ransom empathise the giacinta and the ransom empathise the guillaume then the ransom is freeborn. If something empathise the giacinta then the giacinta empathise the ransom. If the guillaume is not semiweekly then the guillaume does not chase the ransom. If something empathise the giacinta then the giacinta empathise the guillaume. The guillaume does not chase the ransom.", "logic": "\nnot Postictal(giacinta)\nPossess(giacinta, guillaume)\nCarbonise(giacinta, ransom)\nPossess(ransom, giacinta)\nPossess(ransom, guillaume)\nnot Copulatory(guillaume)\nPossess(guillaume, ransom)\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) and Carbonise(x, ransom) -> Semiweekly(ransom))\nforall x (Carbonise(x, guillaume) and Twisting(x) -> not Semiweekly(guillaume))\nforall x (Possess(x, ransom) and Possess(ransom, guillaume) -> Empathise(guillaume, giacinta))\nforall x (Empathise(x, ransom) and not Copulatory(ransom) -> Empathise(ransom, giacinta))\nEmpathise(ransom, giacinta) and Empathise(ransom, guillaume) -> Freeborn(ransom)\nforall x (Empathise(x, giacinta) -> Empathise(giacinta, ransom))\nnot Semiweekly(guillaume) -> not Empathise(guillaume, ransom)\nforall x (Empathise(x, giacinta) -> Empathise(giacinta, guillaume))\n\nnot Empathise(guillaume, ransom)\n\nnot Empathise(guillaume, ransom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "The grant is not rhapsodic. The grant clabber the correy. The grant aromatise the bertrand. The bertrand clabber the grant. The bertrand clabber the correy. The correy is not runty. The correy clabber the bertrand. If something is bigeneric and it aromatise the bertrand then the bertrand is bigeneric. If something aromatise the correy and it is reciprocal then the correy is not bigeneric. If something clabber the bertrand and the bertrand clabber the correy then the correy slant the grant. If something slant the bertrand and the bertrand is not runty then the bertrand slant the grant. If the bertrand slant the grant and the bertrand slant the correy then the bertrand is cherubic. If something slant the grant then the grant slant the bertrand. If the correy is not bigeneric then the correy does not chase the bertrand. If something slant the grant then the grant slant the correy. The bertrand aromatise the correy.", "logic": "\nnot Rhapsodic(grant)\nClabber(grant, correy)\nAromatise(grant, bertrand)\nClabber(bertrand, grant)\nClabber(bertrand, correy)\nnot Runty(correy)\nClabber(correy, bertrand)\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Aromatise(x, bertrand) -> Bigeneric(bertrand))\nforall x (Aromatise(x, correy) and Reciprocal(x) -> not Bigeneric(correy))\nforall x (Clabber(x, bertrand) and Clabber(bertrand, correy) -> Slant(correy, grant))\nforall x (Slant(x, bertrand) and not Runty(bertrand) -> Slant(bertrand, grant))\nSlant(bertrand, grant) and Slant(bertrand, correy) -> Cherubic(bertrand)\nforall x (Slant(x, grant) -> Slant(grant, bertrand))\nnot Bigeneric(correy) -> not Slant(correy, bertrand)\nforall x (Slant(x, grant) -> Slant(grant, correy))\n\nAromatise(bertrand, correy)\n\nAromatise(bertrand, correy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-497"} {"premises": "Ruthann is grieving. Ruthann is suburban. Ruthann is chapleted. Ruthann is unbitter. Ruthann is overfed. Thurstan is suburban. Thurstan is mesmerised. Thurstan is overfed. Gavra is unbitter. Gavra is overfed. Cold things are suburban. Green things are chapleted. Thurstan is mesmerised.", "logic": "\nGrieving(ruthann)\nSuburban(ruthann)\nChapleted(ruthann)\nUnbitter(ruthann)\nOverfed(ruthann)\nSuburban(thurstan)\nMesmerised(thurstan)\nOverfed(thurstan)\nUnbitter(gavra)\nOverfed(gavra)\nforall x (Chapleted(x) -> Suburban(x))\nforall x (Unbitter(x) -> Chapleted(x))\n\nMesmerised(thurstan)\n\ntherefore Mesmerised(thurstan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Rosalyn is diatomic. Rosalyn is roomy. Rosalyn is bellying. Rosalyn is becoming. Rosalyn is cocksure. Camila is roomy. Camila is carinated. Camila is cocksure. Leonidas is becoming. Leonidas is cocksure. Cold things are roomy. Green things are bellying. Rosalyn is not diatomic.", "logic": "\nDiatomic(rosalyn)\nRoomy(rosalyn)\nBellying(rosalyn)\nBecoming(rosalyn)\nCocksure(rosalyn)\nRoomy(camila)\nCarinated(camila)\nCocksure(camila)\nBecoming(leonidas)\nCocksure(leonidas)\nforall x (Bellying(x) -> Roomy(x))\nforall x (Becoming(x) -> Bellying(x))\n\nnot Diatomic(rosalyn)\n\ntherefore Diatomic(rosalyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Candy is seraphical. Candy is notable. Candy is swaggering. Candy is easterly. Candy is agleam. King is notable. King is haired. King is agleam. Ripley is easterly. Ripley is agleam. Cold things are notable. Green things are swaggering. Ripley is swaggering.", "logic": "\nSeraphical(candy)\nNotable(candy)\nSwaggering(candy)\nEasterly(candy)\nAgleam(candy)\nNotable(king)\nHaired(king)\nAgleam(king)\nEasterly(ripley)\nAgleam(ripley)\nforall x (Swaggering(x) -> Notable(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) -> Swaggering(x))\n\nSwaggering(ripley)\n\nEasterly(ripley) and forall x (Easterly(x) -> Swaggering(x)) -> therefore Swaggering(ripley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Avram is teenage. Avram is zapotec. Avram is unexplored. Avram is alleviated. Avram is mystic. Lucila is zapotec. Lucila is rhombic. Lucila is mystic. Barris is alleviated. Barris is mystic. Cold things are zapotec. Green things are unexplored. Barris is not unexplored.", "logic": "\nTeenage(avram)\nZapotec(avram)\nUnexplored(avram)\nAlleviated(avram)\nMystic(avram)\nZapotec(lucila)\nRhombic(lucila)\nMystic(lucila)\nAlleviated(barris)\nMystic(barris)\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Zapotec(x))\nforall x (Alleviated(x) -> Unexplored(x))\n\nnot Unexplored(barris)\n\nAlleviated(barris) and forall x (Alleviated(x) -> Unexplored(x)) -> therefore Unexplored(barris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Amity is sluttish. Amity is clarion. Amity is unthankful. Amity is subtropic. Amity is plane. Graham is clarion. Graham is argentic. Graham is plane. Mercie is subtropic. Mercie is plane. Cold things are clarion. Green things are unthankful. Mercie is clarion.", "logic": "\nSluttish(amity)\nClarion(amity)\nUnthankful(amity)\nSubtropic(amity)\nPlane(amity)\nClarion(graham)\nArgentic(graham)\nPlane(graham)\nSubtropic(mercie)\nPlane(mercie)\nforall x (Unthankful(x) -> Clarion(x))\nforall x (Subtropic(x) -> Unthankful(x))\n\nClarion(mercie)\n\nSubtropic(mercie) and forall x (Subtropic(x) -> Unthankful(x)) -> therefore Unthankful(mercie) Unthankful(mercie) and forall x (Unthankful(x) -> Clarion(x)) -> therefore Clarion(mercie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Rhiamon is credulous. Rhiamon is annular. Rhiamon is unbeloved. Rhiamon is copasetic. Rhiamon is exquisite. Julissa is annular. Julissa is boss. Julissa is exquisite. Mireielle is copasetic. Mireielle is exquisite. Cold things are annular. Green things are unbeloved. Mireielle is not annular.", "logic": "\nCredulous(rhiamon)\nAnnular(rhiamon)\nUnbeloved(rhiamon)\nCopasetic(rhiamon)\nExquisite(rhiamon)\nAnnular(julissa)\nBoss(julissa)\nExquisite(julissa)\nCopasetic(mireielle)\nExquisite(mireielle)\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) -> Annular(x))\nforall x (Copasetic(x) -> Unbeloved(x))\n\nnot Annular(mireielle)\n\nCopasetic(mireielle) and forall x (Copasetic(x) -> Unbeloved(x)) -> therefore Unbeloved(mireielle) Unbeloved(mireielle) and forall x (Unbeloved(x) -> Annular(x)) -> therefore Annular(mireielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Iolande is toxicant. Iolande is documented. Iolande is pyrolignic. Iolande is dependent. Iolande is downright. Sarita is documented. Sarita is boreal. Sarita is downright. Tremain is dependent. Tremain is downright. Cold things are documented. Green things are pyrolignic. Sarita is not pyrolignic.", "logic": "\nToxicant(iolande)\nDocumented(iolande)\nPyrolignic(iolande)\nDependent(iolande)\nDownright(iolande)\nDocumented(sarita)\nBoreal(sarita)\nDownright(sarita)\nDependent(tremain)\nDownright(tremain)\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Documented(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\n\nnot Pyrolignic(sarita)\n\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Pyrolignic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Zandra is fidgety. Zandra is ruandan. Zandra is swinging. Zandra is imported. Zandra is unfaithful. Marianne is ruandan. Marianne is lowborn. Marianne is unfaithful. Brooks is imported. Brooks is unfaithful. Cold things are ruandan. Green things are swinging. Brooks is fidgety.", "logic": "\nFidgety(zandra)\nRuandan(zandra)\nSwinging(zandra)\nImported(zandra)\nUnfaithful(zandra)\nRuandan(marianne)\nLowborn(marianne)\nUnfaithful(marianne)\nImported(brooks)\nUnfaithful(brooks)\nforall x (Swinging(x) -> Ruandan(x))\nforall x (Imported(x) -> Swinging(x))\n\nFidgety(brooks)\n\nFidgety(brooks) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Magda is incursive. Magda is unwelcome. Magda is segmental. Magda is diploid. Magda is aeonian. Melisande is unwelcome. Melisande is peaceable. Melisande is aeonian. Lora is diploid. Lora is aeonian. Cold things are unwelcome. Green things are segmental. Melisande is not diploid.", "logic": "\nIncursive(magda)\nUnwelcome(magda)\nSegmental(magda)\nDiploid(magda)\nAeonian(magda)\nUnwelcome(melisande)\nPeaceable(melisande)\nAeonian(melisande)\nDiploid(lora)\nAeonian(lora)\nforall x (Segmental(x) -> Unwelcome(x))\nforall x (Diploid(x) -> Segmental(x))\n\nnot Diploid(melisande)\n\nnot Diploid(melisande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Joleen is nosohusial. Joleen is plumed. Joleen is stoic. Joleen is tiresome. Joleen is diplomatic. Xenos is plumed. Xenos is squirting. Xenos is diplomatic. Beverie is tiresome. Beverie is diplomatic. Cold things are plumed. Green things are stoic. Xenos is white.", "logic": "\nNosohusial(joleen)\nPlumed(joleen)\nStoic(joleen)\nTiresome(joleen)\nDiplomatic(joleen)\nPlumed(xenos)\nSquirting(xenos)\nDiplomatic(xenos)\nTiresome(beverie)\nDiplomatic(beverie)\nforall x (Stoic(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) -> Stoic(x))\n\nWhite(xenos)\n\nWhite(xenos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Letty is obdurate. Letty is unhindered. Letty is bicornuous. Letty is tubed. Letty is cutthroat. Biddy is unhindered. Biddy is lilting. Biddy is cutthroat. Christel is tubed. Christel is cutthroat. Cold things are unhindered. Green things are bicornuous. Christel is not lilting.", "logic": "\nObdurate(letty)\nUnhindered(letty)\nBicornuous(letty)\nTubed(letty)\nCutthroat(letty)\nUnhindered(biddy)\nLilting(biddy)\nCutthroat(biddy)\nTubed(christel)\nCutthroat(christel)\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\n\nnot Lilting(christel)\n\nnot Lilting(christel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Wendall is rattled. Wendall is earlier. Wendall is hypoactive. Wendall is animal. Wendall is acinose. Berthe is earlier. Berthe is anestric. Berthe is acinose. Darryl is animal. Darryl is acinose. Cold things are earlier. Green things are hypoactive. Darryl is white.", "logic": "\nRattled(wendall)\nEarlier(wendall)\nHypoactive(wendall)\nAnimal(wendall)\nAcinose(wendall)\nEarlier(berthe)\nAnestric(berthe)\nAcinose(berthe)\nAnimal(darryl)\nAcinose(darryl)\nforall x (Hypoactive(x) -> Earlier(x))\nforall x (Animal(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\n\nWhite(darryl)\n\nWhite(darryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Lottie is resinated. Janos is socialist. Rana is ingrained. Florie is inscribed. All bimodal things are socialist. If Rana is bimodal and Rana is ingrained then Rana is inscribed. Green things are bimodal. Janos is socialist.", "logic": "\nResinated(lottie)\nSocialist(janos)\nIngrained(rana)\nInscribed(florie)\nforall x (Bimodal(x) -> Socialist(x))\nBimodal(rana) and Ingrained(rana) -> Inscribed(rana)\nforall x (Ingrained(x) -> Bimodal(x))\n\nSocialist(janos)\n\ntherefore Socialist(janos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Cally is unhumorous. Adriane is provoking. Selena is zigzag. Gwynne is palpebrate. All dizygous things are provoking. If Selena is dizygous and Selena is zigzag then Selena is palpebrate. Green things are dizygous. Adriane is not provoking.", "logic": "\nUnhumorous(cally)\nProvoking(adriane)\nZigzag(selena)\nPalpebrate(gwynne)\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Provoking(x))\nDizygous(selena) and Zigzag(selena) -> Palpebrate(selena)\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> Dizygous(x))\n\nnot Provoking(adriane)\n\ntherefore Provoking(adriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Sadella is reddish. Suzi is opportune. Sallie is forbidden. Rheta is saving. All ghoulish things are opportune. If Sallie is ghoulish and Sallie is forbidden then Sallie is saving. Green things are ghoulish. Sallie is ghoulish.", "logic": "\nReddish(sadella)\nOpportune(suzi)\nForbidden(sallie)\nSaving(rheta)\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Opportune(x))\nGhoulish(sallie) and Forbidden(sallie) -> Saving(sallie)\nforall x (Forbidden(x) -> Ghoulish(x))\n\nGhoulish(sallie)\n\nForbidden(sallie) and forall x (Forbidden(x) -> Ghoulish(x)) -> therefore Ghoulish(sallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Annaliese is jejune. Royce is clotted. Aziz is mighty. Nananne is medicative. All downhill things are clotted. If Aziz is downhill and Aziz is mighty then Aziz is medicative. Green things are downhill. Aziz is not downhill.", "logic": "\nJejune(annaliese)\nClotted(royce)\nMighty(aziz)\nMedicative(nananne)\nforall x (Downhill(x) -> Clotted(x))\nDownhill(aziz) and Mighty(aziz) -> Medicative(aziz)\nforall x (Mighty(x) -> Downhill(x))\n\nnot Downhill(aziz)\n\nMighty(aziz) and forall x (Mighty(x) -> Downhill(x)) -> therefore Downhill(aziz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Shem is dirigible. Debby is sterilised. Marcie is plugged. Alberto is wonderful. All housebound things are sterilised. If Marcie is housebound and Marcie is plugged then Marcie is wonderful. Green things are housebound. Marcie is sterilised.", "logic": "\nDirigible(shem)\nSterilised(debby)\nPlugged(marcie)\nWonderful(alberto)\nforall x (Housebound(x) -> Sterilised(x))\nHousebound(marcie) and Plugged(marcie) -> Wonderful(marcie)\nforall x (Plugged(x) -> Housebound(x))\n\nSterilised(marcie)\n\nPlugged(marcie) and forall x (Plugged(x) -> Housebound(x)) -> therefore Housebound(marcie) Housebound(marcie) and forall x (Housebound(x) -> Sterilised(x)) -> therefore Sterilised(marcie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Ofilia is feverish. Myrtie is ariled. Thaine is crude. Blaine is seriocomic. All inherent things are ariled. If Thaine is inherent and Thaine is crude then Thaine is seriocomic. Green things are inherent. Thaine is not seriocomic.", "logic": "\nFeverish(ofilia)\nAriled(myrtie)\nCrude(thaine)\nSeriocomic(blaine)\nforall x (Inherent(x) -> Ariled(x))\nInherent(thaine) and Crude(thaine) -> Seriocomic(thaine)\nforall x (Crude(x) -> Inherent(x))\n\nnot Seriocomic(thaine)\n\nCrude(thaine) and forall x (Crude(x) -> Inherent(x)) -> therefore Inherent(thaine) Inherent(thaine) and Crude(thaine) and Inherent(thaine) and Crude(thaine) -> Seriocomic(thaine) -> therefore Seriocomic(thaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Ivor is unequalled. Hyacinthe is nettlesome. Nero is spectral. Yigal is locomotive. All postnatal things are nettlesome. If Nero is postnatal and Nero is spectral then Nero is locomotive. Green things are postnatal. Ivor is not nettlesome.", "logic": "\nUnequalled(ivor)\nNettlesome(hyacinthe)\nSpectral(nero)\nLocomotive(yigal)\nforall x (Postnatal(x) -> Nettlesome(x))\nPostnatal(nero) and Spectral(nero) -> Locomotive(nero)\nforall x (Spectral(x) -> Postnatal(x))\n\nnot Nettlesome(ivor)\n\nforall x (Postnatal(x) -> Nettlesome(x)) <- forall x (Spectral(x) -> Postnatal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Gale is treeless. Mellie is northern. Persis is saliferous. Rycca is smudgy. All pied things are northern. If Persis is pied and Persis is saliferous then Persis is smudgy. Green things are pied. Mellie is pied.", "logic": "\nTreeless(gale)\nNorthern(mellie)\nSaliferous(persis)\nSmudgy(rycca)\nforall x (Pied(x) -> Northern(x))\nPied(persis) and Saliferous(persis) -> Smudgy(persis)\nforall x (Saliferous(x) -> Pied(x))\n\nPied(mellie)\n\nforall x (Saliferous(x) -> Pied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Cynthia is various. Gilburt is crowded. Craig is exocrine. Engracia is ghostly. All cardiac things are crowded. If Craig is cardiac and Craig is exocrine then Craig is ghostly. Green things are cardiac. Engracia is not crowded.", "logic": "\nVarious(cynthia)\nCrowded(gilburt)\nExocrine(craig)\nGhostly(engracia)\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Crowded(x))\nCardiac(craig) and Exocrine(craig) -> Ghostly(craig)\nforall x (Exocrine(x) -> Cardiac(x))\n\nnot Crowded(engracia)\n\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Crowded(x)) <- forall x (Exocrine(x) -> Cardiac(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Tory is scandalous. Ellynn is cozy. Nisa is unbearable. Easter is strapping. All amino things are cozy. If Nisa is amino and Nisa is unbearable then Nisa is strapping. Green things are amino. Easter is rough.", "logic": "\nScandalous(tory)\nCozy(ellynn)\nUnbearable(nisa)\nStrapping(easter)\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Cozy(x))\nAmino(nisa) and Unbearable(nisa) -> Strapping(nisa)\nforall x (Unbearable(x) -> Amino(x))\n\nRough(easter)\n\nRough(easter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Marielle is defiant. Elsbeth is unhealthy. Titus is unsalable. Nanci is bespoken. All visored things are unhealthy. If Titus is visored and Titus is unsalable then Titus is bespoken. Green things are visored. Marielle is not unsalable.", "logic": "\nDefiant(marielle)\nUnhealthy(elsbeth)\nUnsalable(titus)\nBespoken(nanci)\nforall x (Visored(x) -> Unhealthy(x))\nVisored(titus) and Unsalable(titus) -> Bespoken(titus)\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Visored(x))\n\nnot Unsalable(marielle)\n\nnot Unsalable(marielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Cesya is goethian. Catherina is hindoo. Trevor is dermal. Lesley is voidable. All opaline things are hindoo. If Trevor is opaline and Trevor is dermal then Trevor is voidable. Green things are opaline. Lesley is goethian.", "logic": "\nGoethian(cesya)\nHindoo(catherina)\nDermal(trevor)\nVoidable(lesley)\nforall x (Opaline(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nOpaline(trevor) and Dermal(trevor) -> Voidable(trevor)\nforall x (Dermal(x) -> Opaline(x))\n\nGoethian(lesley)\n\nGoethian(lesley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Milt is mislaid. Milt is phocine. Flemming is tingling. Flemming is mislaid. Flemming is bichrome. Flemming is smutty. Nissa is phocine. All phocine, bichrome people are tingling. All bichrome people are tingling. Rough people are mislaid. If Milt is bichrome then Milt is mislaid. If someone is tingling and phocine then they are mislaid. Nice people are bichrome. Flemming is mislaid.", "logic": "\nMislaid(milt)\nPhocine(milt)\nTingling(flemming)\nMislaid(flemming)\nBichrome(flemming)\nSmutty(flemming)\nPhocine(nissa)\nforall x (Phocine(x) and Bichrome(x) -> Tingling(x))\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> Tingling(x))\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> Mislaid(x))\nBichrome(milt) -> Mislaid(milt)\nforall x (Tingling(x) and Phocine(x) -> Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> Bichrome(x))\n\nMislaid(flemming)\n\ntherefore Mislaid(flemming)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Dinnie is psychic. Dinnie is revolting. Gustav is celebrated. Gustav is psychic. Gustav is altissimo. Gustav is aphotic. Rocky is revolting. All revolting, altissimo people are celebrated. All altissimo people are celebrated. Rough people are psychic. If Dinnie is altissimo then Dinnie is psychic. If someone is celebrated and revolting then they are psychic. Nice people are altissimo. Gustav is not altissimo.", "logic": "\nPsychic(dinnie)\nRevolting(dinnie)\nCelebrated(gustav)\nPsychic(gustav)\nAltissimo(gustav)\nAphotic(gustav)\nRevolting(rocky)\nforall x (Revolting(x) and Altissimo(x) -> Celebrated(x))\nforall x (Altissimo(x) -> Celebrated(x))\nforall x (Altissimo(x) -> Psychic(x))\nAltissimo(dinnie) -> Psychic(dinnie)\nforall x (Celebrated(x) and Revolting(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Psychic(x) -> Altissimo(x))\n\nnot Altissimo(gustav)\n\ntherefore Altissimo(gustav)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Bjorn is looted. Bjorn is parhelic. Emmye is anadromous. Emmye is looted. Emmye is irritated. Emmye is cataclinal. Deena is parhelic. All parhelic, irritated people are anadromous. All irritated people are anadromous. Rough people are looted. If Bjorn is irritated then Bjorn is looted. If someone is anadromous and parhelic then they are looted. Nice people are irritated. Bjorn is irritated.", "logic": "\nLooted(bjorn)\nParhelic(bjorn)\nAnadromous(emmye)\nLooted(emmye)\nIrritated(emmye)\nCataclinal(emmye)\nParhelic(deena)\nforall x (Parhelic(x) and Irritated(x) -> Anadromous(x))\nforall x (Irritated(x) -> Anadromous(x))\nforall x (Irritated(x) -> Looted(x))\nIrritated(bjorn) -> Looted(bjorn)\nforall x (Anadromous(x) and Parhelic(x) -> Looted(x))\nforall x (Looted(x) -> Irritated(x))\n\nIrritated(bjorn)\n\nLooted(bjorn) and forall x (Looted(x) -> Irritated(x)) -> therefore Irritated(bjorn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Emmet is buried. Emmet is impellent. Fletcher is careful. Fletcher is buried. Fletcher is bridgeable. Fletcher is meddlesome. Teri is impellent. All impellent, bridgeable people are careful. All bridgeable people are careful. Rough people are buried. If Emmet is bridgeable then Emmet is buried. If someone is careful and impellent then they are buried. Nice people are bridgeable. Emmet is not bridgeable.", "logic": "\nBuried(emmet)\nImpellent(emmet)\nCareful(fletcher)\nBuried(fletcher)\nBridgeable(fletcher)\nMeddlesome(fletcher)\nImpellent(teri)\nforall x (Impellent(x) and Bridgeable(x) -> Careful(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> Careful(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> Buried(x))\nBridgeable(emmet) -> Buried(emmet)\nforall x (Careful(x) and Impellent(x) -> Buried(x))\nforall x (Buried(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\n\nnot Bridgeable(emmet)\n\nBuried(emmet) and forall x (Buried(x) -> Bridgeable(x)) -> therefore Bridgeable(emmet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Lea is wilful. Lea is tenebrious. Jillene is monarchic. Jillene is wilful. Jillene is talented. Jillene is nifty. Alejandra is tenebrious. All tenebrious, talented people are monarchic. All talented people are monarchic. Rough people are wilful. If Lea is talented then Lea is wilful. If someone is monarchic and tenebrious then they are wilful. Nice people are talented. Lea is monarchic.", "logic": "\nWilful(lea)\nTenebrious(lea)\nMonarchic(jillene)\nWilful(jillene)\nTalented(jillene)\nNifty(jillene)\nTenebrious(alejandra)\nforall x (Tenebrious(x) and Talented(x) -> Monarchic(x))\nforall x (Talented(x) -> Monarchic(x))\nforall x (Talented(x) -> Wilful(x))\nTalented(lea) -> Wilful(lea)\nforall x (Monarchic(x) and Tenebrious(x) -> Wilful(x))\nforall x (Wilful(x) -> Talented(x))\n\nMonarchic(lea)\n\nWilful(lea) and forall x (Wilful(x) -> Talented(x)) -> therefore Talented(lea) Talented(lea) and forall x (Talented(x) -> Monarchic(x)) -> therefore Monarchic(lea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Flipper is speaking. Flipper is over. Arda is recovering. Arda is speaking. Arda is bogus. Arda is unbendable. Osbert is over. All over, bogus people are recovering. All bogus people are recovering. Rough people are speaking. If Flipper is bogus then Flipper is speaking. If someone is recovering and over then they are speaking. Nice people are bogus. Flipper is not recovering.", "logic": "\nSpeaking(flipper)\nOver(flipper)\nRecovering(arda)\nSpeaking(arda)\nBogus(arda)\nUnbendable(arda)\nOver(osbert)\nforall x (Over(x) and Bogus(x) -> Recovering(x))\nforall x (Bogus(x) -> Recovering(x))\nforall x (Bogus(x) -> Speaking(x))\nBogus(flipper) -> Speaking(flipper)\nforall x (Recovering(x) and Over(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) -> Bogus(x))\n\nnot Recovering(flipper)\n\nSpeaking(flipper) and forall x (Speaking(x) -> Bogus(x)) -> therefore Bogus(flipper) Bogus(flipper) and forall x (Bogus(x) -> Recovering(x)) -> therefore Recovering(flipper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Olivier is converse. Olivier is punitory. Godart is hollywood. Godart is converse. Godart is assured. Godart is geologic. Olimpia is punitory. All punitory, assured people are hollywood. All assured people are hollywood. Rough people are converse. If Olivier is assured then Olivier is converse. If someone is hollywood and punitory then they are converse. Nice people are assured. Olimpia is not hollywood.", "logic": "\nConverse(olivier)\nPunitory(olivier)\nHollywood(godart)\nConverse(godart)\nAssured(godart)\nGeologic(godart)\nPunitory(olimpia)\nforall x (Punitory(x) and Assured(x) -> Hollywood(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Hollywood(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Converse(x))\nAssured(olivier) -> Converse(olivier)\nforall x (Hollywood(x) and Punitory(x) -> Converse(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) -> Assured(x))\n\nnot Hollywood(olimpia)\n\nforall x (Punitory(x) and Assured(x) -> Hollywood(x)) <- forall x (Converse(x) -> Assured(x)) <- forall x (Hollywood(x) and Punitory(x) -> Converse(x)) <- forall x (Assured(x) -> Hollywood(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Rebeka is centroidal. Rebeka is bismuthic. Amata is vinegary. Amata is centroidal. Amata is rapturous. Amata is cyclic. Katherine is bismuthic. All bismuthic, rapturous people are vinegary. All rapturous people are vinegary. Rough people are centroidal. If Rebeka is rapturous then Rebeka is centroidal. If someone is vinegary and bismuthic then they are centroidal. Nice people are rapturous. Katherine is centroidal.", "logic": "\nCentroidal(rebeka)\nBismuthic(rebeka)\nVinegary(amata)\nCentroidal(amata)\nRapturous(amata)\nCyclic(amata)\nBismuthic(katherine)\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Vinegary(x))\nforall x (Rapturous(x) -> Vinegary(x))\nforall x (Rapturous(x) -> Centroidal(x))\nRapturous(rebeka) -> Centroidal(rebeka)\nforall x (Vinegary(x) and Bismuthic(x) -> Centroidal(x))\nforall x (Centroidal(x) -> Rapturous(x))\n\nCentroidal(katherine)\n\nforall x (Rapturous(x) -> Centroidal(x)) <- forall x (Centroidal(x) -> Rapturous(x)) <- forall x (Vinegary(x) and Bismuthic(x) -> Centroidal(x)) <- forall x (Bismuthic(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Vinegary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Carlynne is untold. Carlynne is costless. Nunzio is trichrome. Nunzio is untold. Nunzio is innermost. Nunzio is allegretto. Juliann is costless. All costless, innermost people are trichrome. All innermost people are trichrome. Rough people are untold. If Carlynne is innermost then Carlynne is untold. If someone is trichrome and costless then they are untold. Nice people are innermost. Juliann is not innermost.", "logic": "\nUntold(carlynne)\nCostless(carlynne)\nTrichrome(nunzio)\nUntold(nunzio)\nInnermost(nunzio)\nAllegretto(nunzio)\nCostless(juliann)\nforall x (Costless(x) and Innermost(x) -> Trichrome(x))\nforall x (Innermost(x) -> Trichrome(x))\nforall x (Innermost(x) -> Untold(x))\nInnermost(carlynne) -> Untold(carlynne)\nforall x (Trichrome(x) and Costless(x) -> Untold(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Innermost(x))\n\nnot Innermost(juliann)\n\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Innermost(x)) <- forall x (Trichrome(x) and Costless(x) -> Untold(x)) <- forall x (Costless(x) and Innermost(x) -> Trichrome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Arlee is boggy. Arlee is dioecian. Donetta is tameable. Donetta is boggy. Donetta is unfunny. Donetta is satisfying. Stanleigh is dioecian. All dioecian, unfunny people are tameable. All unfunny people are tameable. Rough people are boggy. If Arlee is unfunny then Arlee is boggy. If someone is tameable and dioecian then they are boggy. Nice people are unfunny. Stanleigh is big.", "logic": "\nBoggy(arlee)\nDioecian(arlee)\nTameable(donetta)\nBoggy(donetta)\nUnfunny(donetta)\nSatisfying(donetta)\nDioecian(stanleigh)\nforall x (Dioecian(x) and Unfunny(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Unfunny(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Unfunny(x) -> Boggy(x))\nUnfunny(arlee) -> Boggy(arlee)\nforall x (Tameable(x) and Dioecian(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Boggy(x) -> Unfunny(x))\n\nBig(stanleigh)\n\nBig(stanleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Sonja is cross. Sonja is hadal. Elmira is mucky. Elmira is cross. Elmira is pyrogenous. Elmira is plus. Iago is hadal. All hadal, pyrogenous people are mucky. All pyrogenous people are mucky. Rough people are cross. If Sonja is pyrogenous then Sonja is cross. If someone is mucky and hadal then they are cross. Nice people are pyrogenous. Sonja is not furry.", "logic": "\nCross(sonja)\nHadal(sonja)\nMucky(elmira)\nCross(elmira)\nPyrogenous(elmira)\nPlus(elmira)\nHadal(iago)\nforall x (Hadal(x) and Pyrogenous(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenous(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenous(x) -> Cross(x))\nPyrogenous(sonja) -> Cross(sonja)\nforall x (Mucky(x) and Hadal(x) -> Cross(x))\nforall x (Cross(x) -> Pyrogenous(x))\n\nnot Furry(sonja)\n\nnot Furry(sonja) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "Tiffy is obliterate. Tiffy is snoopy. Estel is actionable. Estel is obliterate. Estel is foreboding. Estel is mensurable. Monah is snoopy. All snoopy, foreboding people are actionable. All foreboding people are actionable. Rough people are obliterate. If Tiffy is foreboding then Tiffy is obliterate. If someone is actionable and snoopy then they are obliterate. Nice people are foreboding. Estel is furry.", "logic": "\nObliterate(tiffy)\nSnoopy(tiffy)\nActionable(estel)\nObliterate(estel)\nForeboding(estel)\nMensurable(estel)\nSnoopy(monah)\nforall x (Snoopy(x) and Foreboding(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Obliterate(x))\nForeboding(tiffy) -> Obliterate(tiffy)\nforall x (Actionable(x) and Snoopy(x) -> Obliterate(x))\nforall x (Obliterate(x) -> Foreboding(x))\n\nFurry(estel)\n\nFurry(estel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The hogan vomit the dryke. The dryke is unpainted. The foster is banging. The foster vomit the dryke. The dulcine is unpainted. The dulcine vomit the dryke. The dulcine vomit the foster. If someone vomit the dulcine then they are unpainted. If someone vomit the hogan and they are not modeled then they see the dryke. If someone taboo the hogan and they are not bratty then the hogan taboo the dulcine. If someone taboo the dulcine then they do not like the dulcine. If someone vomit the dryke then the dryke taboo the dulcine. If someone resew the hogan and they are bratty then they eat the foster. The dulcine is unpainted.", "logic": "\nVomit(hogan, dryke)\nUnpainted(dryke)\nBanging(foster)\nVomit(foster, dryke)\nUnpainted(dulcine)\nVomit(dulcine, dryke)\nVomit(dulcine, foster)\nforall x (Vomit(x, dulcine) -> Unpainted(x))\nforall x (Vomit(x, hogan) and not Modeled(x) -> Vomit(x, dryke))\nforall x (Taboo(x, hogan) and not Bratty(x) -> Taboo(hogan, dulcine))\nforall x (Taboo(x, dulcine) -> not Resew(x, dulcine))\nforall x (Vomit(x, dryke) -> Taboo(dryke, dulcine))\nforall x (Resew(x, hogan) and Bratty(x) -> Taboo(x, foster))\n\nUnpainted(dulcine)\n\ntherefore Unpainted(dulcine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The sheena blazon the konstance. The konstance is stilted. The amory is sextuple. The amory blazon the konstance. The vic is stilted. The vic blazon the konstance. The vic blazon the amory. If someone blazon the vic then they are stilted. If someone blazon the sheena and they are not midway then they see the konstance. If someone submerse the sheena and they are not segmental then the sheena submerse the vic. If someone submerse the vic then they do not like the vic. If someone blazon the konstance then the konstance submerse the vic. If someone riffle the sheena and they are segmental then they eat the amory. The amory does not see the konstance.", "logic": "\nBlazon(sheena, konstance)\nStilted(konstance)\nSextuple(amory)\nBlazon(amory, konstance)\nStilted(vic)\nBlazon(vic, konstance)\nBlazon(vic, amory)\nforall x (Blazon(x, vic) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Blazon(x, sheena) and not Midway(x) -> Blazon(x, konstance))\nforall x (Submerse(x, sheena) and not Segmental(x) -> Submerse(sheena, vic))\nforall x (Submerse(x, vic) -> not Riffle(x, vic))\nforall x (Blazon(x, konstance) -> Submerse(konstance, vic))\nforall x (Riffle(x, sheena) and Segmental(x) -> Submerse(x, amory))\n\nnot Blazon(amory, konstance)\n\ntherefore Blazon(amory, konstance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The evonne envy the lindie. The lindie is westside. The valdemar is gymnastic. The valdemar envy the lindie. The teresita is westside. The teresita envy the lindie. The teresita envy the valdemar. If someone envy the teresita then they are westside. If someone envy the evonne and they are not undeniable then they see the lindie. If someone bore the evonne and they are not crosswise then the evonne bore the teresita. If someone bore the teresita then they do not like the teresita. If someone envy the lindie then the lindie bore the teresita. If someone disarrange the evonne and they are crosswise then they eat the valdemar. The lindie bore the teresita.", "logic": "\nEnvy(evonne, lindie)\nWestside(lindie)\nGymnastic(valdemar)\nEnvy(valdemar, lindie)\nWestside(teresita)\nEnvy(teresita, lindie)\nEnvy(teresita, valdemar)\nforall x (Envy(x, teresita) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Envy(x, evonne) and not Undeniable(x) -> Envy(x, lindie))\nforall x (Bore(x, evonne) and not Crosswise(x) -> Bore(evonne, teresita))\nforall x (Bore(x, teresita) -> not Disarrange(x, teresita))\nforall x (Envy(x, lindie) -> Bore(lindie, teresita))\nforall x (Disarrange(x, evonne) and Crosswise(x) -> Bore(x, valdemar))\n\nBore(lindie, teresita)\n\nEnvy(evonne, lindie) and forall x (Envy(x, lindie) -> Bore(lindie, teresita)) -> therefore Bore(lindie, teresita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The quillan cock the lucky. The lucky is dishonored. The averil is suchlike. The averil cock the lucky. The kimberlyn is dishonored. The kimberlyn cock the lucky. The kimberlyn cock the averil. If someone cock the kimberlyn then they are dishonored. If someone cock the quillan and they are not unbounded then they see the lucky. If someone evict the quillan and they are not admirable then the quillan evict the kimberlyn. If someone evict the kimberlyn then they do not like the kimberlyn. If someone cock the lucky then the lucky evict the kimberlyn. If someone bourgeon the quillan and they are admirable then they eat the averil. The lucky does not eat the kimberlyn.", "logic": "\nCock(quillan, lucky)\nDishonored(lucky)\nSuchlike(averil)\nCock(averil, lucky)\nDishonored(kimberlyn)\nCock(kimberlyn, lucky)\nCock(kimberlyn, averil)\nforall x (Cock(x, kimberlyn) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Cock(x, quillan) and not Unbounded(x) -> Cock(x, lucky))\nforall x (Evict(x, quillan) and not Admirable(x) -> Evict(quillan, kimberlyn))\nforall x (Evict(x, kimberlyn) -> not Bourgeon(x, kimberlyn))\nforall x (Cock(x, lucky) -> Evict(lucky, kimberlyn))\nforall x (Bourgeon(x, quillan) and Admirable(x) -> Evict(x, averil))\n\nnot Evict(lucky, kimberlyn)\n\nCock(quillan, lucky) and forall x (Cock(x, lucky) -> Evict(lucky, kimberlyn)) -> therefore Evict(lucky, kimberlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The nathanil skipper the loralie. The loralie is dismantled. The bride is cleavable. The bride skipper the loralie. The beatrisa is dismantled. The beatrisa skipper the loralie. The beatrisa skipper the bride. If someone skipper the beatrisa then they are dismantled. If someone skipper the nathanil and they are not errhine then they see the loralie. If someone advect the nathanil and they are not drupaceous then the nathanil advect the beatrisa. If someone advect the beatrisa then they do not like the beatrisa. If someone skipper the loralie then the loralie advect the beatrisa. If someone wrangle the nathanil and they are drupaceous then they eat the bride. The loralie does not like the beatrisa.", "logic": "\nSkipper(nathanil, loralie)\nDismantled(loralie)\nCleavable(bride)\nSkipper(bride, loralie)\nDismantled(beatrisa)\nSkipper(beatrisa, loralie)\nSkipper(beatrisa, bride)\nforall x (Skipper(x, beatrisa) -> Dismantled(x))\nforall x (Skipper(x, nathanil) and not Errhine(x) -> Skipper(x, loralie))\nforall x (Advect(x, nathanil) and not Drupaceous(x) -> Advect(nathanil, beatrisa))\nforall x (Advect(x, beatrisa) -> not Wrangle(x, beatrisa))\nforall x (Skipper(x, loralie) -> Advect(loralie, beatrisa))\nforall x (Wrangle(x, nathanil) and Drupaceous(x) -> Advect(x, bride))\n\nnot Wrangle(loralie, beatrisa)\n\nSkipper(nathanil, loralie) and forall x (Skipper(x, loralie) -> Advect(loralie, beatrisa)) -> therefore Advect(loralie, beatrisa) Advect(loralie, beatrisa) and forall x (Advect(x, beatrisa) -> not Wrangle(x, beatrisa)) -> therefore not Wrangle(loralie, beatrisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The kiley crown the enya. The enya is furnished. The ivy is antiphonal. The ivy crown the enya. The sherwin is furnished. The sherwin crown the enya. The sherwin crown the ivy. If someone crown the sherwin then they are furnished. If someone crown the kiley and they are not sprightly then they see the enya. If someone bombinate the kiley and they are not rumpled then the kiley bombinate the sherwin. If someone bombinate the sherwin then they do not like the sherwin. If someone crown the enya then the enya bombinate the sherwin. If someone nicker the kiley and they are rumpled then they eat the ivy. The enya nicker the sherwin.", "logic": "\nCrown(kiley, enya)\nFurnished(enya)\nAntiphonal(ivy)\nCrown(ivy, enya)\nFurnished(sherwin)\nCrown(sherwin, enya)\nCrown(sherwin, ivy)\nforall x (Crown(x, sherwin) -> Furnished(x))\nforall x (Crown(x, kiley) and not Sprightly(x) -> Crown(x, enya))\nforall x (Bombinate(x, kiley) and not Rumpled(x) -> Bombinate(kiley, sherwin))\nforall x (Bombinate(x, sherwin) -> not Nicker(x, sherwin))\nforall x (Crown(x, enya) -> Bombinate(enya, sherwin))\nforall x (Nicker(x, kiley) and Rumpled(x) -> Bombinate(x, ivy))\n\nNicker(enya, sherwin)\n\nCrown(kiley, enya) and forall x (Crown(x, enya) -> Bombinate(enya, sherwin)) -> therefore Bombinate(enya, sherwin) Bombinate(enya, sherwin) and forall x (Bombinate(x, sherwin) -> not Nicker(x, sherwin)) -> therefore not Nicker(enya, sherwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The bennie dodder the lynett. The lynett is daunting. The anastasie is pagan. The anastasie dodder the lynett. The carie is daunting. The carie dodder the lynett. The carie dodder the anastasie. If someone dodder the carie then they are daunting. If someone dodder the bennie and they are not little then they see the lynett. If someone concertise the bennie and they are not unjointed then the bennie concertise the carie. If someone concertise the carie then they do not like the carie. If someone dodder the lynett then the lynett concertise the carie. If someone stale the bennie and they are unjointed then they eat the anastasie. The anastasie does not eat the anastasie.", "logic": "\nDodder(bennie, lynett)\nDaunting(lynett)\nPagan(anastasie)\nDodder(anastasie, lynett)\nDaunting(carie)\nDodder(carie, lynett)\nDodder(carie, anastasie)\nforall x (Dodder(x, carie) -> Daunting(x))\nforall x (Dodder(x, bennie) and not Little(x) -> Dodder(x, lynett))\nforall x (Concertise(x, bennie) and not Unjointed(x) -> Concertise(bennie, carie))\nforall x (Concertise(x, carie) -> not Stale(x, carie))\nforall x (Dodder(x, lynett) -> Concertise(lynett, carie))\nforall x (Stale(x, bennie) and Unjointed(x) -> Concertise(x, anastasie))\n\nnot Concertise(anastasie, anastasie)\n\nforall x (Stale(x, bennie) and Unjointed(x) -> Concertise(x, anastasie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The hunter enfilade the francis. The francis is fordable. The pammie is fiftieth. The pammie enfilade the francis. The cyrus is fordable. The cyrus enfilade the francis. The cyrus enfilade the pammie. If someone enfilade the cyrus then they are fordable. If someone enfilade the hunter and they are not matte then they see the francis. If someone jade the hunter and they are not flawless then the hunter jade the cyrus. If someone jade the cyrus then they do not like the cyrus. If someone enfilade the francis then the francis jade the cyrus. If someone summerize the hunter and they are flawless then they eat the pammie. The cyrus jade the pammie.", "logic": "\nEnfilade(hunter, francis)\nFordable(francis)\nFiftieth(pammie)\nEnfilade(pammie, francis)\nFordable(cyrus)\nEnfilade(cyrus, francis)\nEnfilade(cyrus, pammie)\nforall x (Enfilade(x, cyrus) -> Fordable(x))\nforall x (Enfilade(x, hunter) and not Matte(x) -> Enfilade(x, francis))\nforall x (Jade(x, hunter) and not Flawless(x) -> Jade(hunter, cyrus))\nforall x (Jade(x, cyrus) -> not Summerize(x, cyrus))\nforall x (Enfilade(x, francis) -> Jade(francis, cyrus))\nforall x (Summerize(x, hunter) and Flawless(x) -> Jade(x, pammie))\n\nJade(cyrus, pammie)\n\nforall x (Summerize(x, hunter) and Flawless(x) -> Jade(x, pammie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The ravil cannonade the shlomo. The shlomo is polynesian. The yoshiko is asthenic. The yoshiko cannonade the shlomo. The foster is polynesian. The foster cannonade the shlomo. The foster cannonade the yoshiko. If someone cannonade the foster then they are polynesian. If someone cannonade the ravil and they are not mouldy then they see the shlomo. If someone heal the ravil and they are not thermoset then the ravil heal the foster. If someone heal the foster then they do not like the foster. If someone cannonade the shlomo then the shlomo heal the foster. If someone cloud the ravil and they are thermoset then they eat the yoshiko. The ravil does not eat the yoshiko.", "logic": "\nCannonade(ravil, shlomo)\nPolynesian(shlomo)\nAsthenic(yoshiko)\nCannonade(yoshiko, shlomo)\nPolynesian(foster)\nCannonade(foster, shlomo)\nCannonade(foster, yoshiko)\nforall x (Cannonade(x, foster) -> Polynesian(x))\nforall x (Cannonade(x, ravil) and not Mouldy(x) -> Cannonade(x, shlomo))\nforall x (Heal(x, ravil) and not Thermoset(x) -> Heal(ravil, foster))\nforall x (Heal(x, foster) -> not Cloud(x, foster))\nforall x (Cannonade(x, shlomo) -> Heal(shlomo, foster))\nforall x (Cloud(x, ravil) and Thermoset(x) -> Heal(x, yoshiko))\n\nnot Heal(ravil, yoshiko)\n\nforall x (Cloud(x, ravil) and Thermoset(x) -> Heal(x, yoshiko)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The duncan march the saunder. The saunder is enatic. The riley is fogged. The riley march the saunder. The derek is enatic. The derek march the saunder. The derek march the riley. If someone march the derek then they are enatic. If someone march the duncan and they are not ovine then they see the saunder. If someone deplumate the duncan and they are not coalesced then the duncan deplumate the derek. If someone deplumate the derek then they do not like the derek. If someone march the saunder then the saunder deplumate the derek. If someone predate the duncan and they are coalesced then they eat the riley. The riley march the duncan.", "logic": "\nMarch(duncan, saunder)\nEnatic(saunder)\nFogged(riley)\nMarch(riley, saunder)\nEnatic(derek)\nMarch(derek, saunder)\nMarch(derek, riley)\nforall x (March(x, derek) -> Enatic(x))\nforall x (March(x, duncan) and not Ovine(x) -> March(x, saunder))\nforall x (Deplumate(x, duncan) and not Coalesced(x) -> Deplumate(duncan, derek))\nforall x (Deplumate(x, derek) -> not Predate(x, derek))\nforall x (March(x, saunder) -> Deplumate(saunder, derek))\nforall x (Predate(x, duncan) and Coalesced(x) -> Deplumate(x, riley))\n\nMarch(riley, duncan)\n\nMarch(riley, duncan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The orrin submerse the hakim. The hakim is rwandan. The kaleb is cathectic. The kaleb submerse the hakim. The vivianne is rwandan. The vivianne submerse the hakim. The vivianne submerse the kaleb. If someone submerse the vivianne then they are rwandan. If someone submerse the orrin and they are not bicoloured then they see the hakim. If someone dehisce the orrin and they are not indexless then the orrin dehisce the vivianne. If someone dehisce the vivianne then they do not like the vivianne. If someone submerse the hakim then the hakim dehisce the vivianne. If someone plunge the orrin and they are indexless then they eat the kaleb. The vivianne does not eat the hakim.", "logic": "\nSubmerse(orrin, hakim)\nRwandan(hakim)\nCathectic(kaleb)\nSubmerse(kaleb, hakim)\nRwandan(vivianne)\nSubmerse(vivianne, hakim)\nSubmerse(vivianne, kaleb)\nforall x (Submerse(x, vivianne) -> Rwandan(x))\nforall x (Submerse(x, orrin) and not Bicoloured(x) -> Submerse(x, hakim))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, orrin) and not Indexless(x) -> Dehisce(orrin, vivianne))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, vivianne) -> not Plunge(x, vivianne))\nforall x (Submerse(x, hakim) -> Dehisce(hakim, vivianne))\nforall x (Plunge(x, orrin) and Indexless(x) -> Dehisce(x, kaleb))\n\nnot Dehisce(vivianne, hakim)\n\nnot Dehisce(vivianne, hakim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The blisse entitle the doralynne. The doralynne is bubonic. The alfreda is triplex. The alfreda entitle the doralynne. The orson is bubonic. The orson entitle the doralynne. The orson entitle the alfreda. If someone entitle the orson then they are bubonic. If someone entitle the blisse and they are not expansile then they see the doralynne. If someone earmark the blisse and they are not notorious then the blisse earmark the orson. If someone earmark the orson then they do not like the orson. If someone entitle the doralynne then the doralynne earmark the orson. If someone conscript the blisse and they are notorious then they eat the alfreda. The orson is notorious.", "logic": "\nEntitle(blisse, doralynne)\nBubonic(doralynne)\nTriplex(alfreda)\nEntitle(alfreda, doralynne)\nBubonic(orson)\nEntitle(orson, doralynne)\nEntitle(orson, alfreda)\nforall x (Entitle(x, orson) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Entitle(x, blisse) and not Expansile(x) -> Entitle(x, doralynne))\nforall x (Earmark(x, blisse) and not Notorious(x) -> Earmark(blisse, orson))\nforall x (Earmark(x, orson) -> not Conscript(x, orson))\nforall x (Entitle(x, doralynne) -> Earmark(doralynne, orson))\nforall x (Conscript(x, blisse) and Notorious(x) -> Earmark(x, alfreda))\n\nNotorious(orson)\n\nNotorious(orson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1889"} {"premises": "The sallie compound the matilde. The ailee compound the matilde. The matilde is principal. If the sallie reassemble the ailee then the sallie humour the ailee. If something compound the matilde then it reassemble the ailee. If something reassemble the ailee and it is gleeful then it reassemble the sallie. The ailee compound the matilde.", "logic": "\nCompound(sallie, matilde)\nCompound(ailee, matilde)\nPrincipal(matilde)\nReassemble(sallie, ailee) -> Humour(sallie, ailee)\nforall x (Compound(x, matilde) -> Reassemble(x, ailee))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, ailee) and Gleeful(x) -> Reassemble(x, sallie))\n\nCompound(ailee, matilde)\n\ntherefore Compound(ailee, matilde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The mallory indict the skylar. The denise indict the skylar. The skylar is staunch. If the mallory invert the denise then the mallory invalid the denise. If something indict the skylar then it invert the denise. If something invert the denise and it is vestmented then it invert the mallory. The mallory does not visit the skylar.", "logic": "\nIndict(mallory, skylar)\nIndict(denise, skylar)\nStaunch(skylar)\nInvert(mallory, denise) -> Invalid(mallory, denise)\nforall x (Indict(x, skylar) -> Invert(x, denise))\nforall x (Invert(x, denise) and Vestmented(x) -> Invert(x, mallory))\n\nnot Indict(mallory, skylar)\n\ntherefore Indict(mallory, skylar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The dorolice adjudge the josephine. The saw adjudge the josephine. The josephine is scattered. If the dorolice drowse the saw then the dorolice camouflage the saw. If something adjudge the josephine then it drowse the saw. If something drowse the saw and it is subsequent then it drowse the dorolice. The saw drowse the saw.", "logic": "\nAdjudge(dorolice, josephine)\nAdjudge(saw, josephine)\nScattered(josephine)\nDrowse(dorolice, saw) -> Camouflage(dorolice, saw)\nforall x (Adjudge(x, josephine) -> Drowse(x, saw))\nforall x (Drowse(x, saw) and Subsequent(x) -> Drowse(x, dorolice))\n\nDrowse(saw, saw)\n\nAdjudge(saw, josephine) and forall x (Adjudge(x, josephine) -> Drowse(x, saw)) -> therefore Drowse(saw, saw)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The rhonda deoxidise the emanuel. The ora deoxidise the emanuel. The emanuel is scientific. If the rhonda sadden the ora then the rhonda indulge the ora. If something deoxidise the emanuel then it sadden the ora. If something sadden the ora and it is anarchic then it sadden the rhonda. The ora does not see the ora.", "logic": "\nDeoxidise(rhonda, emanuel)\nDeoxidise(ora, emanuel)\nScientific(emanuel)\nSadden(rhonda, ora) -> Indulge(rhonda, ora)\nforall x (Deoxidise(x, emanuel) -> Sadden(x, ora))\nforall x (Sadden(x, ora) and Anarchic(x) -> Sadden(x, rhonda))\n\nnot Sadden(ora, ora)\n\nDeoxidise(ora, emanuel) and forall x (Deoxidise(x, emanuel) -> Sadden(x, ora)) -> therefore Sadden(ora, ora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The marys slop the cammi. The jereme slop the cammi. The cammi is conforming. If the marys reignite the jereme then the marys shepherd the jereme. If something slop the cammi then it reignite the jereme. If something reignite the jereme and it is onomastic then it reignite the marys. The marys shepherd the jereme.", "logic": "\nSlop(marys, cammi)\nSlop(jereme, cammi)\nConforming(cammi)\nReignite(marys, jereme) -> Shepherd(marys, jereme)\nforall x (Slop(x, cammi) -> Reignite(x, jereme))\nforall x (Reignite(x, jereme) and Onomastic(x) -> Reignite(x, marys))\n\nShepherd(marys, jereme)\n\nSlop(marys, cammi) and forall x (Slop(x, cammi) -> Reignite(x, jereme)) -> therefore Reignite(marys, jereme) Reignite(marys, jereme) and Reignite(marys, jereme) -> Shepherd(marys, jereme) -> therefore Shepherd(marys, jereme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The genna interbreed the edgardo. The stefan interbreed the edgardo. The edgardo is laxative. If the genna skirmish the stefan then the genna defraud the stefan. If something interbreed the edgardo then it skirmish the stefan. If something skirmish the stefan and it is solemn then it skirmish the genna. The genna does not eat the stefan.", "logic": "\nInterbreed(genna, edgardo)\nInterbreed(stefan, edgardo)\nLaxative(edgardo)\nSkirmish(genna, stefan) -> Defraud(genna, stefan)\nforall x (Interbreed(x, edgardo) -> Skirmish(x, stefan))\nforall x (Skirmish(x, stefan) and Solemn(x) -> Skirmish(x, genna))\n\nnot Defraud(genna, stefan)\n\nInterbreed(genna, edgardo) and forall x (Interbreed(x, edgardo) -> Skirmish(x, stefan)) -> therefore Skirmish(genna, stefan) Skirmish(genna, stefan) and Skirmish(genna, stefan) -> Defraud(genna, stefan) -> therefore Defraud(genna, stefan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The hussein improvise the ozzy. The rowe improvise the ozzy. The ozzy is colloquial. If the hussein requite the rowe then the hussein awake the rowe. If something improvise the ozzy then it requite the rowe. If something requite the rowe and it is romance then it requite the hussein. The rowe does not see the hussein.", "logic": "\nImprovise(hussein, ozzy)\nImprovise(rowe, ozzy)\nColloquial(ozzy)\nRequite(hussein, rowe) -> Awake(hussein, rowe)\nforall x (Improvise(x, ozzy) -> Requite(x, rowe))\nforall x (Requite(x, rowe) and Romance(x) -> Requite(x, hussein))\n\nnot Requite(rowe, hussein)\n\nforall x (Requite(x, rowe) and Romance(x) -> Requite(x, hussein)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The sophi orient the hetti. The lynea orient the hetti. The hetti is biennial. If the sophi foredate the lynea then the sophi revise the lynea. If something orient the hetti then it foredate the lynea. If something foredate the lynea and it is prescribed then it foredate the sophi. The hetti foredate the lynea.", "logic": "\nOrient(sophi, hetti)\nOrient(lynea, hetti)\nBiennial(hetti)\nForedate(sophi, lynea) -> Revise(sophi, lynea)\nforall x (Orient(x, hetti) -> Foredate(x, lynea))\nforall x (Foredate(x, lynea) and Prescribed(x) -> Foredate(x, sophi))\n\nForedate(hetti, lynea)\n\nforall x (Orient(x, hetti) -> Foredate(x, lynea)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The calla form the saba. The ham form the saba. The saba is cyanogenic. If the calla pinch the ham then the calla swinge the ham. If something form the saba then it pinch the ham. If something pinch the ham and it is appalling then it pinch the calla. The calla does not see the calla.", "logic": "\nForm(calla, saba)\nForm(ham, saba)\nCyanogenic(saba)\nPinch(calla, ham) -> Swinge(calla, ham)\nforall x (Form(x, saba) -> Pinch(x, ham))\nforall x (Pinch(x, ham) and Appalling(x) -> Pinch(x, calla))\n\nnot Pinch(calla, calla)\n\nforall x (Pinch(x, ham) and Appalling(x) -> Pinch(x, calla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The frederik interlope the tawnya. The tyson interlope the tawnya. The tawnya is pumped. If the frederik balloon the tyson then the frederik engrave the tyson. If something interlope the tawnya then it balloon the tyson. If something balloon the tyson and it is large then it balloon the frederik. The frederik is nice.", "logic": "\nInterlope(frederik, tawnya)\nInterlope(tyson, tawnya)\nPumped(tawnya)\nBalloon(frederik, tyson) -> Engrave(frederik, tyson)\nforall x (Interlope(x, tawnya) -> Balloon(x, tyson))\nforall x (Balloon(x, tyson) and Large(x) -> Balloon(x, frederik))\n\nNice(frederik)\n\nNice(frederik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The marijo exsert the zackariah. The flower exsert the zackariah. The zackariah is annulate. If the marijo sensitize the flower then the marijo scend the flower. If something exsert the zackariah then it sensitize the flower. If something sensitize the flower and it is inflamed then it sensitize the marijo. The flower does not visit the marijo.", "logic": "\nExsert(marijo, zackariah)\nExsert(flower, zackariah)\nAnnulate(zackariah)\nSensitize(marijo, flower) -> Scend(marijo, flower)\nforall x (Exsert(x, zackariah) -> Sensitize(x, flower))\nforall x (Sensitize(x, flower) and Inflamed(x) -> Sensitize(x, marijo))\n\nnot Exsert(flower, marijo)\n\nnot Exsert(flower, marijo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The benjamin eliminate the deirdre. The jephthah eliminate the deirdre. The deirdre is reverse. If the benjamin crisp the jephthah then the benjamin overload the jephthah. If something eliminate the deirdre then it crisp the jephthah. If something crisp the jephthah and it is flameproof then it crisp the benjamin. The deirdre eliminate the jephthah.", "logic": "\nEliminate(benjamin, deirdre)\nEliminate(jephthah, deirdre)\nReverse(deirdre)\nCrisp(benjamin, jephthah) -> Overload(benjamin, jephthah)\nforall x (Eliminate(x, deirdre) -> Crisp(x, jephthah))\nforall x (Crisp(x, jephthah) and Flameproof(x) -> Crisp(x, benjamin))\n\nEliminate(deirdre, jephthah)\n\nEliminate(deirdre, jephthah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1288"} {"premises": "The minerva is unearthly. The minerva is maxillary. The minerva is localized. The minerva prefix the robina. The minerva does not see the robina. The robina is unearthly. The robina is localized. The robina perorate the winifield. The robina prefix the minerva. The robina prologise the minerva. The robina does not see the winifield. The winifield is not inchoative. The winifield perorate the minerva. The winifield prefix the minerva. The winifield prologise the minerva. If someone prologise the robina then they do not like the minerva. If someone perorate the winifield and they are localized then they see the robina. The minerva prefix the robina.", "logic": "\nUnearthly(minerva)\nMaxillary(minerva)\nLocalized(minerva)\nPrefix(minerva, robina)\nnot Prologise(minerva, robina)\nUnearthly(robina)\nLocalized(robina)\nPerorate(robina, winifield)\nPrefix(robina, minerva)\nPrologise(robina, minerva)\nnot Prologise(robina, winifield)\nnot Inchoative(winifield)\nPerorate(winifield, minerva)\nPrefix(winifield, minerva)\nPrologise(winifield, minerva)\nforall x (Prologise(x, robina) -> not Perorate(x, minerva))\nforall x (Perorate(x, winifield) and Localized(x) -> Prologise(x, robina))\n\nPrefix(minerva, robina)\n\ntherefore Prefix(minerva, robina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The magdaia is optative. The magdaia is hierarchal. The magdaia is prepared. The magdaia cave the beth. The magdaia does not see the beth. The beth is optative. The beth is prepared. The beth cudgel the stephanie. The beth cave the magdaia. The beth disparage the magdaia. The beth does not see the stephanie. The stephanie is not braided. The stephanie cudgel the magdaia. The stephanie cave the magdaia. The stephanie disparage the magdaia. If someone disparage the beth then they do not like the magdaia. If someone cudgel the stephanie and they are prepared then they see the beth. The stephanie does not see the magdaia.", "logic": "\nOptative(magdaia)\nHierarchal(magdaia)\nPrepared(magdaia)\nCave(magdaia, beth)\nnot Disparage(magdaia, beth)\nOptative(beth)\nPrepared(beth)\nCudgel(beth, stephanie)\nCave(beth, magdaia)\nDisparage(beth, magdaia)\nnot Disparage(beth, stephanie)\nnot Braided(stephanie)\nCudgel(stephanie, magdaia)\nCave(stephanie, magdaia)\nDisparage(stephanie, magdaia)\nforall x (Disparage(x, beth) -> not Cudgel(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Cudgel(x, stephanie) and Prepared(x) -> Disparage(x, beth))\n\nnot Disparage(stephanie, magdaia)\n\ntherefore Disparage(stephanie, magdaia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The ceil is genuine. The ceil is hammered. The ceil is forehanded. The ceil energise the lennie. The ceil does not see the lennie. The lennie is genuine. The lennie is forehanded. The lennie peer the gredel. The lennie energise the ceil. The lennie salt the ceil. The lennie does not see the gredel. The gredel is not budding. The gredel peer the ceil. The gredel energise the ceil. The gredel salt the ceil. If someone salt the lennie then they do not like the ceil. If someone peer the gredel and they are forehanded then they see the lennie. The lennie salt the lennie.", "logic": "\nGenuine(ceil)\nHammered(ceil)\nForehanded(ceil)\nEnergise(ceil, lennie)\nnot Salt(ceil, lennie)\nGenuine(lennie)\nForehanded(lennie)\nPeer(lennie, gredel)\nEnergise(lennie, ceil)\nSalt(lennie, ceil)\nnot Salt(lennie, gredel)\nnot Budding(gredel)\nPeer(gredel, ceil)\nEnergise(gredel, ceil)\nSalt(gredel, ceil)\nforall x (Salt(x, lennie) -> not Peer(x, ceil))\nforall x (Peer(x, gredel) and Forehanded(x) -> Salt(x, lennie))\n\nSalt(lennie, lennie)\n\nPeer(lennie, gredel) and Forehanded(lennie) and forall x (Peer(x, gredel) and Forehanded(x) -> Salt(x, lennie)) -> therefore Salt(lennie, lennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The clarey is denatured. The clarey is cyclical. The clarey is bellyless. The clarey foreswear the page. The clarey does not see the page. The page is denatured. The page is bellyless. The page rebuild the waylan. The page foreswear the clarey. The page incrust the clarey. The page does not see the waylan. The waylan is not trigonal. The waylan rebuild the clarey. The waylan foreswear the clarey. The waylan incrust the clarey. If someone incrust the page then they do not like the clarey. If someone rebuild the waylan and they are bellyless then they see the page. The page does not see the page.", "logic": "\nDenatured(clarey)\nCyclical(clarey)\nBellyless(clarey)\nForeswear(clarey, page)\nnot Incrust(clarey, page)\nDenatured(page)\nBellyless(page)\nRebuild(page, waylan)\nForeswear(page, clarey)\nIncrust(page, clarey)\nnot Incrust(page, waylan)\nnot Trigonal(waylan)\nRebuild(waylan, clarey)\nForeswear(waylan, clarey)\nIncrust(waylan, clarey)\nforall x (Incrust(x, page) -> not Rebuild(x, clarey))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, waylan) and Bellyless(x) -> Incrust(x, page))\n\nnot Incrust(page, page)\n\nRebuild(page, waylan) and Bellyless(page) and forall x (Rebuild(x, waylan) and Bellyless(x) -> Incrust(x, page)) -> therefore Incrust(page, page)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The allegra is impuissant. The allegra is nuptial. The allegra is gifted. The allegra spar the christof. The allegra does not see the christof. The christof is impuissant. The christof is gifted. The christof lighten the clarence. The christof spar the allegra. The christof castrate the allegra. The christof does not see the clarence. The clarence is not whispered. The clarence lighten the allegra. The clarence spar the allegra. The clarence castrate the allegra. If someone castrate the christof then they do not like the allegra. If someone lighten the clarence and they are gifted then they see the christof. The christof does not like the allegra.", "logic": "\nImpuissant(allegra)\nNuptial(allegra)\nGifted(allegra)\nSpar(allegra, christof)\nnot Castrate(allegra, christof)\nImpuissant(christof)\nGifted(christof)\nLighten(christof, clarence)\nSpar(christof, allegra)\nCastrate(christof, allegra)\nnot Castrate(christof, clarence)\nnot Whispered(clarence)\nLighten(clarence, allegra)\nSpar(clarence, allegra)\nCastrate(clarence, allegra)\nforall x (Castrate(x, christof) -> not Lighten(x, allegra))\nforall x (Lighten(x, clarence) and Gifted(x) -> Castrate(x, christof))\n\nnot Lighten(christof, allegra)\n\nLighten(christof, clarence) and Gifted(christof) and forall x (Lighten(x, clarence) and Gifted(x) -> Castrate(x, christof)) -> therefore Castrate(christof, christof) Castrate(christof, christof) and forall x (Castrate(x, christof) -> not Lighten(x, allegra)) -> therefore not Lighten(christof, allegra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The nerta is foliate. The nerta is anoxic. The nerta is assaultive. The nerta behave the steve. The nerta does not see the steve. The steve is foliate. The steve is assaultive. The steve crank the davon. The steve behave the nerta. The steve strum the nerta. The steve does not see the davon. The davon is not kurdish. The davon crank the nerta. The davon behave the nerta. The davon strum the nerta. If someone strum the steve then they do not like the nerta. If someone crank the davon and they are assaultive then they see the steve. The steve crank the nerta.", "logic": "\nFoliate(nerta)\nAnoxic(nerta)\nAssaultive(nerta)\nBehave(nerta, steve)\nnot Strum(nerta, steve)\nFoliate(steve)\nAssaultive(steve)\nCrank(steve, davon)\nBehave(steve, nerta)\nStrum(steve, nerta)\nnot Strum(steve, davon)\nnot Kurdish(davon)\nCrank(davon, nerta)\nBehave(davon, nerta)\nStrum(davon, nerta)\nforall x (Strum(x, steve) -> not Crank(x, nerta))\nforall x (Crank(x, davon) and Assaultive(x) -> Strum(x, steve))\n\nCrank(steve, nerta)\n\nCrank(steve, davon) and Assaultive(steve) and forall x (Crank(x, davon) and Assaultive(x) -> Strum(x, steve)) -> therefore Strum(steve, steve) Strum(steve, steve) and forall x (Strum(x, steve) -> not Crank(x, nerta)) -> therefore not Crank(steve, nerta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The christoph is baptised. The christoph is evocative. The christoph is animated. The christoph feud the monica. The christoph does not see the monica. The monica is baptised. The monica is animated. The monica sidestep the ulrick. The monica feud the christoph. The monica repress the christoph. The monica does not see the ulrick. The ulrick is not virulent. The ulrick sidestep the christoph. The ulrick feud the christoph. The ulrick repress the christoph. If someone repress the monica then they do not like the christoph. If someone sidestep the ulrick and they are animated then they see the monica. The ulrick does not see the monica.", "logic": "\nBaptised(christoph)\nEvocative(christoph)\nAnimated(christoph)\nFeud(christoph, monica)\nnot Repress(christoph, monica)\nBaptised(monica)\nAnimated(monica)\nSidestep(monica, ulrick)\nFeud(monica, christoph)\nRepress(monica, christoph)\nnot Repress(monica, ulrick)\nnot Virulent(ulrick)\nSidestep(ulrick, christoph)\nFeud(ulrick, christoph)\nRepress(ulrick, christoph)\nforall x (Repress(x, monica) -> not Sidestep(x, christoph))\nforall x (Sidestep(x, ulrick) and Animated(x) -> Repress(x, monica))\n\nnot Repress(ulrick, monica)\n\nforall x (Sidestep(x, ulrick) and Animated(x) -> Repress(x, monica)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The kellyann is scrappy. The kellyann is barbarous. The kellyann is prehensile. The kellyann quake the aurilia. The kellyann does not see the aurilia. The aurilia is scrappy. The aurilia is prehensile. The aurilia cartoon the keri. The aurilia quake the kellyann. The aurilia annihilate the kellyann. The aurilia does not see the keri. The keri is not shamefaced. The keri cartoon the kellyann. The keri quake the kellyann. The keri annihilate the kellyann. If someone annihilate the aurilia then they do not like the kellyann. If someone cartoon the keri and they are prehensile then they see the aurilia. The kellyann annihilate the keri.", "logic": "\nScrappy(kellyann)\nBarbarous(kellyann)\nPrehensile(kellyann)\nQuake(kellyann, aurilia)\nnot Annihilate(kellyann, aurilia)\nScrappy(aurilia)\nPrehensile(aurilia)\nCartoon(aurilia, keri)\nQuake(aurilia, kellyann)\nAnnihilate(aurilia, kellyann)\nnot Annihilate(aurilia, keri)\nnot Shamefaced(keri)\nCartoon(keri, kellyann)\nQuake(keri, kellyann)\nAnnihilate(keri, kellyann)\nforall x (Annihilate(x, aurilia) -> not Cartoon(x, kellyann))\nforall x (Cartoon(x, keri) and Prehensile(x) -> Annihilate(x, aurilia))\n\nAnnihilate(kellyann, keri)\n\nAnnihilate(kellyann, keri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The catie is unchanging. The catie is ascendent. The catie is frowsy. The catie reach the jobey. The catie does not see the jobey. The jobey is unchanging. The jobey is frowsy. The jobey unman the grove. The jobey reach the catie. The jobey recover the catie. The jobey does not see the grove. The grove is not reducible. The grove unman the catie. The grove reach the catie. The grove recover the catie. If someone recover the jobey then they do not like the catie. If someone unman the grove and they are frowsy then they see the jobey. The catie does not like the catie.", "logic": "\nUnchanging(catie)\nAscendent(catie)\nFrowsy(catie)\nReach(catie, jobey)\nnot Recover(catie, jobey)\nUnchanging(jobey)\nFrowsy(jobey)\nUnman(jobey, grove)\nReach(jobey, catie)\nRecover(jobey, catie)\nnot Recover(jobey, grove)\nnot Reducible(grove)\nUnman(grove, catie)\nReach(grove, catie)\nRecover(grove, catie)\nforall x (Recover(x, jobey) -> not Unman(x, catie))\nforall x (Unman(x, grove) and Frowsy(x) -> Recover(x, jobey))\n\nnot Unman(catie, catie)\n\nnot Unman(catie, catie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The hestia is untimbered. The hestia is funded. The hestia is lipless. The hestia clap the carsten. The hestia does not see the carsten. The carsten is untimbered. The carsten is lipless. The carsten lignify the rahal. The carsten clap the hestia. The carsten exhort the hestia. The carsten does not see the rahal. The rahal is not wizard. The rahal lignify the hestia. The rahal clap the hestia. The rahal exhort the hestia. If someone exhort the carsten then they do not like the hestia. If someone lignify the rahal and they are lipless then they see the carsten. The rahal exhort the rahal.", "logic": "\nUntimbered(hestia)\nFunded(hestia)\nLipless(hestia)\nClap(hestia, carsten)\nnot Exhort(hestia, carsten)\nUntimbered(carsten)\nLipless(carsten)\nLignify(carsten, rahal)\nClap(carsten, hestia)\nExhort(carsten, hestia)\nnot Exhort(carsten, rahal)\nnot Wizard(rahal)\nLignify(rahal, hestia)\nClap(rahal, hestia)\nExhort(rahal, hestia)\nforall x (Exhort(x, carsten) -> not Lignify(x, hestia))\nforall x (Lignify(x, rahal) and Lipless(x) -> Exhort(x, carsten))\n\nExhort(rahal, rahal)\n\nExhort(rahal, rahal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The neile is plenary. The neile is hyperbolic. The neile is multiple. The neile surge the morris. The neile does not see the morris. The morris is plenary. The morris is multiple. The morris deride the hebert. The morris surge the neile. The morris abrogate the neile. The morris does not see the hebert. The hebert is not caucasic. The hebert deride the neile. The hebert surge the neile. The hebert abrogate the neile. If someone abrogate the morris then they do not like the neile. If someone deride the hebert and they are multiple then they see the morris. The neile does not need the neile.", "logic": "\nPlenary(neile)\nHyperbolic(neile)\nMultiple(neile)\nSurge(neile, morris)\nnot Abrogate(neile, morris)\nPlenary(morris)\nMultiple(morris)\nDeride(morris, hebert)\nSurge(morris, neile)\nAbrogate(morris, neile)\nnot Abrogate(morris, hebert)\nnot Caucasic(hebert)\nDeride(hebert, neile)\nSurge(hebert, neile)\nAbrogate(hebert, neile)\nforall x (Abrogate(x, morris) -> not Deride(x, neile))\nforall x (Deride(x, hebert) and Multiple(x) -> Abrogate(x, morris))\n\nnot Surge(neile, neile)\n\nnot Surge(neile, neile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The serge is unrentable. The serge is basilar. The serge is leading. The serge congee the jocelyne. The serge does not see the jocelyne. The jocelyne is unrentable. The jocelyne is leading. The jocelyne catnap the kally. The jocelyne congee the serge. The jocelyne hypnotise the serge. The jocelyne does not see the kally. The kally is not visceral. The kally catnap the serge. The kally congee the serge. The kally hypnotise the serge. If someone hypnotise the jocelyne then they do not like the serge. If someone catnap the kally and they are leading then they see the jocelyne. The jocelyne is basilar.", "logic": "\nUnrentable(serge)\nBasilar(serge)\nLeading(serge)\nCongee(serge, jocelyne)\nnot Hypnotise(serge, jocelyne)\nUnrentable(jocelyne)\nLeading(jocelyne)\nCatnap(jocelyne, kally)\nCongee(jocelyne, serge)\nHypnotise(jocelyne, serge)\nnot Hypnotise(jocelyne, kally)\nnot Visceral(kally)\nCatnap(kally, serge)\nCongee(kally, serge)\nHypnotise(kally, serge)\nforall x (Hypnotise(x, jocelyne) -> not Catnap(x, serge))\nforall x (Catnap(x, kally) and Leading(x) -> Hypnotise(x, jocelyne))\n\nBasilar(jocelyne)\n\nBasilar(jocelyne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1826"} {"premises": "The luna pine the helge. The luna is empathetic. The luna is agrarian. The luna is several. The luna is thai. The luna is synoptic. The luna index the helge. The luna profile the helge. The helge pine the luna. The helge is agrarian. The helge is several. The helge is thai. The helge is synoptic. The helge index the luna. The helge profile the luna. If something pine the helge and the helge is several then the helge is synoptic. If something is agrarian then it index the luna. If something profile the helge then the helge index the luna. If something pine the luna then it profile the helge. If something index the helge then the helge is synoptic. If something index the helge then the helge index the luna. If something is agrarian then it pine the helge. If something profile the helge and it profile the luna then the helge is empathetic. The luna is thai.", "logic": "\nPine(luna, helge)\nEmpathetic(luna)\nAgrarian(luna)\nSeveral(luna)\nThai(luna)\nSynoptic(luna)\nIndex(luna, helge)\nProfile(luna, helge)\nPine(helge, luna)\nAgrarian(helge)\nSeveral(helge)\nThai(helge)\nSynoptic(helge)\nIndex(helge, luna)\nProfile(helge, luna)\nforall x (Pine(x, helge) and Several(helge) -> Synoptic(helge))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) -> Index(x, luna))\nforall x (Profile(x, helge) -> Index(helge, luna))\nforall x (Pine(x, luna) -> Profile(x, helge))\nforall x (Index(x, helge) -> Synoptic(helge))\nforall x (Index(x, helge) -> Index(helge, luna))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) -> Pine(x, helge))\nforall x (Profile(x, helge) and Profile(x, luna) -> Empathetic(helge))\n\nThai(luna)\n\ntherefore Thai(luna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "The danni overwhelm the aggy. The danni is dimorphic. The danni is habited. The danni is aired. The danni is undisputed. The danni is unamended. The danni purify the aggy. The danni overhang the aggy. The aggy overwhelm the danni. The aggy is habited. The aggy is aired. The aggy is undisputed. The aggy is unamended. The aggy purify the danni. The aggy overhang the danni. If something overwhelm the aggy and the aggy is aired then the aggy is unamended. If something is habited then it purify the danni. If something overhang the aggy then the aggy purify the danni. If something overwhelm the danni then it overhang the aggy. If something purify the aggy then the aggy is unamended. If something purify the aggy then the aggy purify the danni. If something is habited then it overwhelm the aggy. If something overhang the aggy and it overhang the danni then the aggy is dimorphic. The danni is not undisputed.", "logic": "\nOverwhelm(danni, aggy)\nDimorphic(danni)\nHabited(danni)\nAired(danni)\nUndisputed(danni)\nUnamended(danni)\nPurify(danni, aggy)\nOverhang(danni, aggy)\nOverwhelm(aggy, danni)\nHabited(aggy)\nAired(aggy)\nUndisputed(aggy)\nUnamended(aggy)\nPurify(aggy, danni)\nOverhang(aggy, danni)\nforall x (Overwhelm(x, aggy) and Aired(aggy) -> Unamended(aggy))\nforall x (Habited(x) -> Purify(x, danni))\nforall x (Overhang(x, aggy) -> Purify(aggy, danni))\nforall x (Overwhelm(x, danni) -> Overhang(x, aggy))\nforall x (Purify(x, aggy) -> Unamended(aggy))\nforall x (Purify(x, aggy) -> Purify(aggy, danni))\nforall x (Habited(x) -> Overwhelm(x, aggy))\nforall x (Overhang(x, aggy) and Overhang(x, danni) -> Dimorphic(aggy))\n\nnot Undisputed(danni)\n\ntherefore Undisputed(danni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "The arlee skyjack the chance. The arlee is alone. The arlee is disused. The arlee is adulterous. The arlee is cautionary. The arlee is running. The arlee churn the chance. The arlee mist the chance. The chance skyjack the arlee. The chance is disused. The chance is adulterous. The chance is cautionary. The chance is running. The chance churn the arlee. The chance mist the arlee. If something skyjack the chance and the chance is adulterous then the chance is running. If something is disused then it churn the arlee. If something mist the chance then the chance churn the arlee. If something skyjack the arlee then it mist the chance. If something churn the chance then the chance is running. If something churn the chance then the chance churn the arlee. If something is disused then it skyjack the chance. If something mist the chance and it mist the arlee then the chance is alone. The chance mist the chance.", "logic": "\nSkyjack(arlee, chance)\nAlone(arlee)\nDisused(arlee)\nAdulterous(arlee)\nCautionary(arlee)\nRunning(arlee)\nChurn(arlee, chance)\nMist(arlee, chance)\nSkyjack(chance, arlee)\nDisused(chance)\nAdulterous(chance)\nCautionary(chance)\nRunning(chance)\nChurn(chance, arlee)\nMist(chance, arlee)\nforall x (Skyjack(x, chance) and Adulterous(chance) -> Running(chance))\nforall x (Disused(x) -> Churn(x, arlee))\nforall x (Mist(x, chance) -> Churn(chance, arlee))\nforall x (Skyjack(x, arlee) -> Mist(x, chance))\nforall x (Churn(x, chance) -> Running(chance))\nforall x (Churn(x, chance) -> Churn(chance, arlee))\nforall x (Disused(x) -> Skyjack(x, chance))\nforall x (Mist(x, chance) and Mist(x, arlee) -> Alone(chance))\n\nMist(chance, chance)\n\nSkyjack(chance, arlee) and forall x (Skyjack(x, arlee) -> Mist(x, chance)) -> therefore Mist(chance, chance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "The heidi look the gaspar. The heidi is blended. The heidi is animated. The heidi is crusted. The heidi is brusk. The heidi is unabused. The heidi repercuss the gaspar. The heidi remediate the gaspar. The gaspar look the heidi. The gaspar is animated. The gaspar is crusted. The gaspar is brusk. The gaspar is unabused. The gaspar repercuss the heidi. The gaspar remediate the heidi. If something look the gaspar and the gaspar is crusted then the gaspar is unabused. If something is animated then it repercuss the heidi. If something remediate the gaspar then the gaspar repercuss the heidi. If something look the heidi then it remediate the gaspar. If something repercuss the gaspar then the gaspar is unabused. If something repercuss the gaspar then the gaspar repercuss the heidi. If something is animated then it look the gaspar. If something remediate the gaspar and it remediate the heidi then the gaspar is blended. The heidi does not like the heidi.", "logic": "\nLook(heidi, gaspar)\nBlended(heidi)\nAnimated(heidi)\nCrusted(heidi)\nBrusk(heidi)\nUnabused(heidi)\nRepercuss(heidi, gaspar)\nRemediate(heidi, gaspar)\nLook(gaspar, heidi)\nAnimated(gaspar)\nCrusted(gaspar)\nBrusk(gaspar)\nUnabused(gaspar)\nRepercuss(gaspar, heidi)\nRemediate(gaspar, heidi)\nforall x (Look(x, gaspar) and Crusted(gaspar) -> Unabused(gaspar))\nforall x (Animated(x) -> Repercuss(x, heidi))\nforall x (Remediate(x, gaspar) -> Repercuss(gaspar, heidi))\nforall x (Look(x, heidi) -> Remediate(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, gaspar) -> Unabused(gaspar))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, gaspar) -> Repercuss(gaspar, heidi))\nforall x (Animated(x) -> Look(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Remediate(x, gaspar) and Remediate(x, heidi) -> Blended(gaspar))\n\nnot Repercuss(heidi, heidi)\n\nAnimated(heidi) and forall x (Animated(x) -> Repercuss(x, heidi)) -> therefore Repercuss(heidi, heidi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "The reube outbalance the aveline. The reube is waterproof. The reube is womanlike. The reube is ternate. The reube is solved. The reube is sick. The reube canvass the aveline. The reube stockade the aveline. The aveline outbalance the reube. The aveline is womanlike. The aveline is ternate. The aveline is solved. The aveline is sick. The aveline canvass the reube. The aveline stockade the reube. If something outbalance the aveline and the aveline is ternate then the aveline is sick. If something is womanlike then it canvass the reube. If something stockade the aveline then the aveline canvass the reube. If something outbalance the reube then it stockade the aveline. If something canvass the aveline then the aveline is sick. If something canvass the aveline then the aveline canvass the reube. If something is womanlike then it outbalance the aveline. If something stockade the aveline and it stockade the reube then the aveline is waterproof. The aveline is waterproof.", "logic": "\nOutbalance(reube, aveline)\nWaterproof(reube)\nWomanlike(reube)\nTernate(reube)\nSolved(reube)\nSick(reube)\nCanvass(reube, aveline)\nStockade(reube, aveline)\nOutbalance(aveline, reube)\nWomanlike(aveline)\nTernate(aveline)\nSolved(aveline)\nSick(aveline)\nCanvass(aveline, reube)\nStockade(aveline, reube)\nforall x (Outbalance(x, aveline) and Ternate(aveline) -> Sick(aveline))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Canvass(x, reube))\nforall x (Stockade(x, aveline) -> Canvass(aveline, reube))\nforall x (Outbalance(x, reube) -> Stockade(x, aveline))\nforall x (Canvass(x, aveline) -> Sick(aveline))\nforall x (Canvass(x, aveline) -> Canvass(aveline, reube))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Outbalance(x, aveline))\nforall x (Stockade(x, aveline) and Stockade(x, reube) -> Waterproof(aveline))\n\nWaterproof(aveline)\n\nOutbalance(aveline, reube) and forall x (Outbalance(x, reube) -> Stockade(x, aveline)) -> therefore Stockade(aveline, aveline) Stockade(aveline, aveline) and Stockade(aveline, reube) and forall x (Stockade(x, aveline) and Stockade(x, reube) -> Waterproof(aveline)) -> therefore Waterproof(aveline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "The delores squint the consuela. The delores is ergotic. The delores is smallish. The delores is workable. The delores is micaceous. The delores is religious. The delores undergo the consuela. The delores relish the consuela. The consuela squint the delores. The consuela is smallish. The consuela is workable. The consuela is micaceous. The consuela is religious. The consuela undergo the delores. The consuela relish the delores. If something squint the consuela and the consuela is workable then the consuela is religious. If something is smallish then it undergo the delores. If something relish the consuela then the consuela undergo the delores. If something squint the delores then it relish the consuela. If something undergo the consuela then the consuela is religious. If something undergo the consuela then the consuela undergo the delores. If something is smallish then it squint the consuela. If something relish the consuela and it relish the delores then the consuela is ergotic. The consuela is not ergotic.", "logic": "\nSquint(delores, consuela)\nErgotic(delores)\nSmallish(delores)\nWorkable(delores)\nMicaceous(delores)\nReligious(delores)\nUndergo(delores, consuela)\nRelish(delores, consuela)\nSquint(consuela, delores)\nSmallish(consuela)\nWorkable(consuela)\nMicaceous(consuela)\nReligious(consuela)\nUndergo(consuela, delores)\nRelish(consuela, delores)\nforall x (Squint(x, consuela) and Workable(consuela) -> Religious(consuela))\nforall x (Smallish(x) -> Undergo(x, delores))\nforall x (Relish(x, consuela) -> Undergo(consuela, delores))\nforall x (Squint(x, delores) -> Relish(x, consuela))\nforall x (Undergo(x, consuela) -> Religious(consuela))\nforall x (Undergo(x, consuela) -> Undergo(consuela, delores))\nforall x (Smallish(x) -> Squint(x, consuela))\nforall x (Relish(x, consuela) and Relish(x, delores) -> Ergotic(consuela))\n\nnot Ergotic(consuela)\n\nSquint(consuela, delores) and forall x (Squint(x, delores) -> Relish(x, consuela)) -> therefore Relish(consuela, consuela) Relish(consuela, consuela) and Relish(consuela, delores) and forall x (Relish(x, consuela) and Relish(x, delores) -> Ergotic(consuela)) -> therefore Ergotic(consuela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "The liana retract the ayn. The liana is rejective. The liana is laden. The liana is genotypic. The liana is xiii. The liana is yelled. The liana tour the ayn. The liana yearn the ayn. The ayn retract the liana. The ayn is laden. The ayn is genotypic. The ayn is xiii. The ayn is yelled. The ayn tour the liana. The ayn yearn the liana. If something retract the ayn and the ayn is genotypic then the ayn is yelled. If something is laden then it tour the liana. If something yearn the ayn then the ayn tour the liana. If something retract the liana then it yearn the ayn. If something tour the ayn then the ayn is yelled. If something tour the ayn then the ayn tour the liana. If something is laden then it retract the ayn. If something yearn the ayn and it yearn the liana then the ayn is rejective. The liana does not see the liana.", "logic": "\nRetract(liana, ayn)\nRejective(liana)\nLaden(liana)\nGenotypic(liana)\nXiii(liana)\nYelled(liana)\nTour(liana, ayn)\nYearn(liana, ayn)\nRetract(ayn, liana)\nLaden(ayn)\nGenotypic(ayn)\nXiii(ayn)\nYelled(ayn)\nTour(ayn, liana)\nYearn(ayn, liana)\nforall x (Retract(x, ayn) and Genotypic(ayn) -> Yelled(ayn))\nforall x (Laden(x) -> Tour(x, liana))\nforall x (Yearn(x, ayn) -> Tour(ayn, liana))\nforall x (Retract(x, liana) -> Yearn(x, ayn))\nforall x (Tour(x, ayn) -> Yelled(ayn))\nforall x (Tour(x, ayn) -> Tour(ayn, liana))\nforall x (Laden(x) -> Retract(x, ayn))\nforall x (Yearn(x, ayn) and Yearn(x, liana) -> Rejective(ayn))\n\nnot Yearn(liana, liana)\n\nnot Yearn(liana, liana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "The sigfrid snoop the carrissa. The sigfrid is hispid. The sigfrid is paid. The sigfrid is greatest. The sigfrid is queenlike. The sigfrid is carven. The sigfrid unteach the carrissa. The sigfrid wolf the carrissa. The carrissa snoop the sigfrid. The carrissa is paid. The carrissa is greatest. The carrissa is queenlike. The carrissa is carven. The carrissa unteach the sigfrid. The carrissa wolf the sigfrid. If something snoop the carrissa and the carrissa is greatest then the carrissa is carven. If something is paid then it unteach the sigfrid. If something wolf the carrissa then the carrissa unteach the sigfrid. If something snoop the sigfrid then it wolf the carrissa. If something unteach the carrissa then the carrissa is carven. If something unteach the carrissa then the carrissa unteach the sigfrid. If something is paid then it snoop the carrissa. If something wolf the carrissa and it wolf the sigfrid then the carrissa is hispid. The sigfrid snoop the sigfrid.", "logic": "\nSnoop(sigfrid, carrissa)\nHispid(sigfrid)\nPaid(sigfrid)\nGreatest(sigfrid)\nQueenlike(sigfrid)\nCarven(sigfrid)\nUnteach(sigfrid, carrissa)\nWolf(sigfrid, carrissa)\nSnoop(carrissa, sigfrid)\nPaid(carrissa)\nGreatest(carrissa)\nQueenlike(carrissa)\nCarven(carrissa)\nUnteach(carrissa, sigfrid)\nWolf(carrissa, sigfrid)\nforall x (Snoop(x, carrissa) and Greatest(carrissa) -> Carven(carrissa))\nforall x (Paid(x) -> Unteach(x, sigfrid))\nforall x (Wolf(x, carrissa) -> Unteach(carrissa, sigfrid))\nforall x (Snoop(x, sigfrid) -> Wolf(x, carrissa))\nforall x (Unteach(x, carrissa) -> Carven(carrissa))\nforall x (Unteach(x, carrissa) -> Unteach(carrissa, sigfrid))\nforall x (Paid(x) -> Snoop(x, carrissa))\nforall x (Wolf(x, carrissa) and Wolf(x, sigfrid) -> Hispid(carrissa))\n\nSnoop(sigfrid, sigfrid)\n\nSnoop(sigfrid, sigfrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-713"} {"premises": "Kalli is lxxiii. Magdalen is troubling. Kalindi is medical. All troubling people are twilight. All troubling, medical people are not twilight. If someone is libelous and not troubling then they are appetising. All medical, troubling people are not appetising. If Magdalen is not troubling then Magdalen is headed. Red people are headed. Round, twilight people are not headed. If Kalli is medical and Kalli is not appetising then Kalli is twilight. Kalli is lxxiii.", "logic": "\nLxxiii(kalli)\nTroubling(magdalen)\nMedical(kalindi)\nforall x (Troubling(x) -> Twilight(x))\nforall x (Troubling(x) and Medical(x) -> not Twilight(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) and not Troubling(x) -> Appetising(x))\nforall x (Medical(x) and Troubling(x) -> not Appetising(x))\nnot Troubling(magdalen) -> Headed(magdalen)\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Headed(x))\nforall x (Troubling(x) and Twilight(x) -> not Headed(x))\nMedical(kalli) and not Appetising(kalli) -> Twilight(kalli)\n\nLxxiii(kalli)\n\ntherefore Lxxiii(kalli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Ulberto is equipt. Prentice is conformist. Shirl is unwoven. All conformist people are dear. All conformist, unwoven people are not dear. If someone is sorbed and not conformist then they are diabolical. All unwoven, conformist people are not diabolical. If Prentice is not conformist then Prentice is hulky. Red people are hulky. Round, dear people are not hulky. If Ulberto is unwoven and Ulberto is not diabolical then Ulberto is dear. Ulberto is not equipt.", "logic": "\nEquipt(ulberto)\nConformist(prentice)\nUnwoven(shirl)\nforall x (Conformist(x) -> Dear(x))\nforall x (Conformist(x) and Unwoven(x) -> not Dear(x))\nforall x (Sorbed(x) and not Conformist(x) -> Diabolical(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Conformist(x) -> not Diabolical(x))\nnot Conformist(prentice) -> Hulky(prentice)\nforall x (Sorbed(x) -> Hulky(x))\nforall x (Conformist(x) and Dear(x) -> not Hulky(x))\nUnwoven(ulberto) and not Diabolical(ulberto) -> Dear(ulberto)\n\nnot Equipt(ulberto)\n\ntherefore Equipt(ulberto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Marcy is facial. Netty is prevalent. Manny is thunderous. All prevalent people are dextral. All prevalent, thunderous people are not dextral. If someone is majuscular and not prevalent then they are inland. All thunderous, prevalent people are not inland. If Netty is not prevalent then Netty is paunchy. Red people are paunchy. Round, dextral people are not paunchy. If Marcy is thunderous and Marcy is not inland then Marcy is dextral. Netty is dextral.", "logic": "\nFacial(marcy)\nPrevalent(netty)\nThunderous(manny)\nforall x (Prevalent(x) -> Dextral(x))\nforall x (Prevalent(x) and Thunderous(x) -> not Dextral(x))\nforall x (Majuscular(x) and not Prevalent(x) -> Inland(x))\nforall x (Thunderous(x) and Prevalent(x) -> not Inland(x))\nnot Prevalent(netty) -> Paunchy(netty)\nforall x (Majuscular(x) -> Paunchy(x))\nforall x (Prevalent(x) and Dextral(x) -> not Paunchy(x))\nThunderous(marcy) and not Inland(marcy) -> Dextral(marcy)\n\nDextral(netty)\n\nPrevalent(netty) and forall x (Prevalent(x) -> Dextral(x)) -> therefore Dextral(netty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Josi is incoming. Theobald is medial. Elisa is affordable. All medial people are scant. All medial, affordable people are not scant. If someone is beechen and not medial then they are millionth. All affordable, medial people are not millionth. If Theobald is not medial then Theobald is cetaceous. Red people are cetaceous. Round, scant people are not cetaceous. If Josi is affordable and Josi is not millionth then Josi is scant. Theobald is not scant.", "logic": "\nIncoming(josi)\nMedial(theobald)\nAffordable(elisa)\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Scant(x))\nforall x (Medial(x) and Affordable(x) -> not Scant(x))\nforall x (Beechen(x) and not Medial(x) -> Millionth(x))\nforall x (Affordable(x) and Medial(x) -> not Millionth(x))\nnot Medial(theobald) -> Cetaceous(theobald)\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\nforall x (Medial(x) and Scant(x) -> not Cetaceous(x))\nAffordable(josi) and not Millionth(josi) -> Scant(josi)\n\nnot Scant(theobald)\n\nMedial(theobald) and forall x (Medial(x) -> Scant(x)) -> therefore Scant(theobald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Chere is poetical. Tibold is more. Laird is lancinate. All more people are mandatory. All more, lancinate people are not mandatory. If someone is unsatiated and not more then they are murderous. All lancinate, more people are not murderous. If Tibold is not more then Tibold is quizzical. Red people are quizzical. Round, mandatory people are not quizzical. If Chere is lancinate and Chere is not murderous then Chere is mandatory. Tibold is not quizzical.", "logic": "\nPoetical(chere)\nMore(tibold)\nLancinate(laird)\nforall x (More(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nforall x (More(x) and Lancinate(x) -> not Mandatory(x))\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) and not More(x) -> Murderous(x))\nforall x (Lancinate(x) and More(x) -> not Murderous(x))\nnot More(tibold) -> Quizzical(tibold)\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) -> Quizzical(x))\nforall x (More(x) and Mandatory(x) -> not Quizzical(x))\nLancinate(chere) and not Murderous(chere) -> Mandatory(chere)\n\nnot Quizzical(tibold)\n\nMore(tibold) and forall x (More(x) -> Mandatory(x)) -> therefore Mandatory(tibold) More(tibold) and Mandatory(tibold) and forall x (More(x) and Mandatory(x) -> not Quizzical(x)) -> therefore not Quizzical(tibold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Sibelle is gabby. Selestina is driven. Sallie is ethnical. All driven people are modeled. All driven, ethnical people are not modeled. If someone is cytolytic and not driven then they are beamish. All ethnical, driven people are not beamish. If Selestina is not driven then Selestina is viral. Red people are viral. Round, modeled people are not viral. If Sibelle is ethnical and Sibelle is not beamish then Sibelle is modeled. Selestina is viral.", "logic": "\nGabby(sibelle)\nDriven(selestina)\nEthnical(sallie)\nforall x (Driven(x) -> Modeled(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Ethnical(x) -> not Modeled(x))\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) and not Driven(x) -> Beamish(x))\nforall x (Ethnical(x) and Driven(x) -> not Beamish(x))\nnot Driven(selestina) -> Viral(selestina)\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Viral(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Modeled(x) -> not Viral(x))\nEthnical(sibelle) and not Beamish(sibelle) -> Modeled(sibelle)\n\nViral(selestina)\n\nDriven(selestina) and forall x (Driven(x) -> Modeled(x)) -> therefore Modeled(selestina) Driven(selestina) and Modeled(selestina) and forall x (Driven(x) and Modeled(x) -> not Viral(x)) -> therefore not Viral(selestina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Ginnifer is spidery. Teodoro is diachronic. Fanny is unpatented. All diachronic people are tame. All diachronic, unpatented people are not tame. If someone is outsized and not diachronic then they are capacious. All unpatented, diachronic people are not capacious. If Teodoro is not diachronic then Teodoro is palmlike. Red people are palmlike. Round, tame people are not palmlike. If Ginnifer is unpatented and Ginnifer is not capacious then Ginnifer is tame. Fanny is not palmlike.", "logic": "\nSpidery(ginnifer)\nDiachronic(teodoro)\nUnpatented(fanny)\nforall x (Diachronic(x) -> Tame(x))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) and Unpatented(x) -> not Tame(x))\nforall x (Outsized(x) and not Diachronic(x) -> Capacious(x))\nforall x (Unpatented(x) and Diachronic(x) -> not Capacious(x))\nnot Diachronic(teodoro) -> Palmlike(teodoro)\nforall x (Outsized(x) -> Palmlike(x))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) and Tame(x) -> not Palmlike(x))\nUnpatented(ginnifer) and not Capacious(ginnifer) -> Tame(ginnifer)\n\nnot Palmlike(fanny)\n\nforall x (Outsized(x) -> Palmlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Sibley is sceptered. Lenette is dormant. Tamma is youngish. All dormant people are astringent. All dormant, youngish people are not astringent. If someone is tabular and not dormant then they are unthankful. All youngish, dormant people are not unthankful. If Lenette is not dormant then Lenette is bulbar. Red people are bulbar. Round, astringent people are not bulbar. If Sibley is youngish and Sibley is not unthankful then Sibley is astringent. Sibley is astringent.", "logic": "\nSceptered(sibley)\nDormant(lenette)\nYoungish(tamma)\nforall x (Dormant(x) -> Astringent(x))\nforall x (Dormant(x) and Youngish(x) -> not Astringent(x))\nforall x (Tabular(x) and not Dormant(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Youngish(x) and Dormant(x) -> not Unthankful(x))\nnot Dormant(lenette) -> Bulbar(lenette)\nforall x (Tabular(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Dormant(x) and Astringent(x) -> not Bulbar(x))\nYoungish(sibley) and not Unthankful(sibley) -> Astringent(sibley)\n\nAstringent(sibley)\n\nforall x (Dormant(x) -> Astringent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Chelsie is crusty. Ryan is unequaled. Inesita is separatist. All unequaled people are teary. All unequaled, separatist people are not teary. If someone is scholastic and not unequaled then they are reformed. All separatist, unequaled people are not reformed. If Ryan is not unequaled then Ryan is changing. Red people are changing. Round, teary people are not changing. If Chelsie is separatist and Chelsie is not reformed then Chelsie is teary. Chelsie is not changing.", "logic": "\nCrusty(chelsie)\nUnequaled(ryan)\nSeparatist(inesita)\nforall x (Unequaled(x) -> Teary(x))\nforall x (Unequaled(x) and Separatist(x) -> not Teary(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) and not Unequaled(x) -> Reformed(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) and Unequaled(x) -> not Reformed(x))\nnot Unequaled(ryan) -> Changing(ryan)\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Changing(x))\nforall x (Unequaled(x) and Teary(x) -> not Changing(x))\nSeparatist(chelsie) and not Reformed(chelsie) -> Teary(chelsie)\n\nnot Changing(chelsie)\n\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Changing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Kyrstin is meaty. Udall is summative. Obadiah is geocentric. All summative people are bulgarian. All summative, geocentric people are not bulgarian. If someone is gross and not summative then they are medicative. All geocentric, summative people are not medicative. If Udall is not summative then Udall is leglike. Red people are leglike. Round, bulgarian people are not leglike. If Kyrstin is geocentric and Kyrstin is not medicative then Kyrstin is bulgarian. Kyrstin is gross.", "logic": "\nMeaty(kyrstin)\nSummative(udall)\nGeocentric(obadiah)\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Bulgarian(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) and Geocentric(x) -> not Bulgarian(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) and not Summative(x) -> Medicative(x))\nforall x (Geocentric(x) and Summative(x) -> not Medicative(x))\nnot Summative(udall) -> Leglike(udall)\nforall x (Gross(x) -> Leglike(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) and Bulgarian(x) -> not Leglike(x))\nGeocentric(kyrstin) and not Medicative(kyrstin) -> Bulgarian(kyrstin)\n\nGross(kyrstin)\n\nGross(kyrstin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Karmen is bowleg. Elihu is dyspneic. Nikolia is subsequent. All dyspneic people are protected. All dyspneic, subsequent people are not protected. If someone is anginose and not dyspneic then they are ribbed. All subsequent, dyspneic people are not ribbed. If Elihu is not dyspneic then Elihu is malefic. Red people are malefic. Round, protected people are not malefic. If Karmen is subsequent and Karmen is not ribbed then Karmen is protected. Elihu is not bowleg.", "logic": "\nBowleg(karmen)\nDyspneic(elihu)\nSubsequent(nikolia)\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) -> Protected(x))\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) and Subsequent(x) -> not Protected(x))\nforall x (Anginose(x) and not Dyspneic(x) -> Ribbed(x))\nforall x (Subsequent(x) and Dyspneic(x) -> not Ribbed(x))\nnot Dyspneic(elihu) -> Malefic(elihu)\nforall x (Anginose(x) -> Malefic(x))\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) and Protected(x) -> not Malefic(x))\nSubsequent(karmen) and not Ribbed(karmen) -> Protected(karmen)\n\nnot Bowleg(elihu)\n\nnot Bowleg(elihu) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "Pavla is aspectual. Hakeem is emaciated. Ibby is billion. All emaciated people are veinal. All emaciated, billion people are not veinal. If someone is ritual and not emaciated then they are some. All billion, emaciated people are not some. If Hakeem is not emaciated then Hakeem is stocked. Red people are stocked. Round, veinal people are not stocked. If Pavla is billion and Pavla is not some then Pavla is veinal. Ibby is emaciated.", "logic": "\nAspectual(pavla)\nEmaciated(hakeem)\nBillion(ibby)\nforall x (Emaciated(x) -> Veinal(x))\nforall x (Emaciated(x) and Billion(x) -> not Veinal(x))\nforall x (Ritual(x) and not Emaciated(x) -> Some(x))\nforall x (Billion(x) and Emaciated(x) -> not Some(x))\nnot Emaciated(hakeem) -> Stocked(hakeem)\nforall x (Ritual(x) -> Stocked(x))\nforall x (Emaciated(x) and Veinal(x) -> not Stocked(x))\nBillion(pavla) and not Some(pavla) -> Veinal(pavla)\n\nEmaciated(ibby)\n\nEmaciated(ibby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-562"} {"premises": "The sidnee does not eat the garfield. The sidnee is unhealed. The sidnee hedgehop the karisa. The karisa does not chase the garfield. The karisa linearise the sidnee. The karisa does not eat the garfield. The karisa is not immature. The karisa is panoptic. The karisa does not visit the sidnee. The karisa hedgehop the garfield. The garfield does not chase the sidnee. The garfield nobble the karisa. The garfield linearise the sidnee. The garfield is immature. The garfield hedgehop the sidnee. If someone nobble the karisa then they chase the garfield. If someone linearise the sidnee and they chase the garfield then they are panoptic. The garfield does not chase the sidnee.", "logic": "\nnot Linearise(sidnee, garfield)\nUnhealed(sidnee)\nHedgehop(sidnee, karisa)\nnot Nobble(karisa, garfield)\nLinearise(karisa, sidnee)\nnot Linearise(karisa, garfield)\nnot Immature(karisa)\nPanoptic(karisa)\nnot Hedgehop(karisa, sidnee)\nHedgehop(karisa, garfield)\nnot Nobble(garfield, sidnee)\nNobble(garfield, karisa)\nLinearise(garfield, sidnee)\nImmature(garfield)\nHedgehop(garfield, sidnee)\nforall x (Nobble(x, karisa) -> Nobble(x, garfield))\nforall x (Linearise(x, sidnee) and Nobble(x, garfield) -> Panoptic(x))\n\nnot Nobble(garfield, sidnee)\n\ntherefore not Nobble(garfield, sidnee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The talbert does not eat the christoph. The talbert is inveterate. The talbert jeer the lari. The lari does not chase the christoph. The lari stifle the talbert. The lari does not eat the christoph. The lari is not dopy. The lari is cinematic. The lari does not visit the talbert. The lari jeer the christoph. The christoph does not chase the talbert. The christoph quickstep the lari. The christoph stifle the talbert. The christoph is dopy. The christoph jeer the talbert. If someone quickstep the lari then they chase the christoph. If someone stifle the talbert and they chase the christoph then they are cinematic. The christoph is not dopy.", "logic": "\nnot Stifle(talbert, christoph)\nInveterate(talbert)\nJeer(talbert, lari)\nnot Quickstep(lari, christoph)\nStifle(lari, talbert)\nnot Stifle(lari, christoph)\nnot Dopy(lari)\nCinematic(lari)\nnot Jeer(lari, talbert)\nJeer(lari, christoph)\nnot Quickstep(christoph, talbert)\nQuickstep(christoph, lari)\nStifle(christoph, talbert)\nDopy(christoph)\nJeer(christoph, talbert)\nforall x (Quickstep(x, lari) -> Quickstep(x, christoph))\nforall x (Stifle(x, talbert) and Quickstep(x, christoph) -> Cinematic(x))\n\nnot Dopy(christoph)\n\ntherefore Dopy(christoph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The flem does not eat the netty. The flem is deserving. The flem instruct the mitch. The mitch does not chase the netty. The mitch accentuate the flem. The mitch does not eat the netty. The mitch is not fallow. The mitch is bolshevist. The mitch does not visit the flem. The mitch instruct the netty. The netty does not chase the flem. The netty colly the mitch. The netty accentuate the flem. The netty is fallow. The netty instruct the flem. If someone colly the mitch then they chase the netty. If someone accentuate the flem and they chase the netty then they are bolshevist. The netty colly the netty.", "logic": "\nnot Accentuate(flem, netty)\nDeserving(flem)\nInstruct(flem, mitch)\nnot Colly(mitch, netty)\nAccentuate(mitch, flem)\nnot Accentuate(mitch, netty)\nnot Fallow(mitch)\nBolshevist(mitch)\nnot Instruct(mitch, flem)\nInstruct(mitch, netty)\nnot Colly(netty, flem)\nColly(netty, mitch)\nAccentuate(netty, flem)\nFallow(netty)\nInstruct(netty, flem)\nforall x (Colly(x, mitch) -> Colly(x, netty))\nforall x (Accentuate(x, flem) and Colly(x, netty) -> Bolshevist(x))\n\nColly(netty, netty)\n\nColly(netty, mitch) and forall x (Colly(x, mitch) -> Colly(x, netty)) -> therefore Colly(netty, netty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The marianna does not eat the cheri. The marianna is shielded. The marianna respite the karry. The karry does not chase the cheri. The karry personify the marianna. The karry does not eat the cheri. The karry is not silicious. The karry is perverse. The karry does not visit the marianna. The karry respite the cheri. The cheri does not chase the marianna. The cheri gazump the karry. The cheri personify the marianna. The cheri is silicious. The cheri respite the marianna. If someone gazump the karry then they chase the cheri. If someone personify the marianna and they chase the cheri then they are perverse. The cheri does not chase the cheri.", "logic": "\nnot Personify(marianna, cheri)\nShielded(marianna)\nRespite(marianna, karry)\nnot Gazump(karry, cheri)\nPersonify(karry, marianna)\nnot Personify(karry, cheri)\nnot Silicious(karry)\nPerverse(karry)\nnot Respite(karry, marianna)\nRespite(karry, cheri)\nnot Gazump(cheri, marianna)\nGazump(cheri, karry)\nPersonify(cheri, marianna)\nSilicious(cheri)\nRespite(cheri, marianna)\nforall x (Gazump(x, karry) -> Gazump(x, cheri))\nforall x (Personify(x, marianna) and Gazump(x, cheri) -> Perverse(x))\n\nnot Gazump(cheri, cheri)\n\nGazump(cheri, karry) and forall x (Gazump(x, karry) -> Gazump(x, cheri)) -> therefore Gazump(cheri, cheri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The thorvald does not eat the townsend. The thorvald is amorphous. The thorvald gelatinise the juditha. The juditha does not chase the townsend. The juditha bilge the thorvald. The juditha does not eat the townsend. The juditha is not hmong. The juditha is minty. The juditha does not visit the thorvald. The juditha gelatinise the townsend. The townsend does not chase the thorvald. The townsend mimeo the juditha. The townsend bilge the thorvald. The townsend is hmong. The townsend gelatinise the thorvald. If someone mimeo the juditha then they chase the townsend. If someone bilge the thorvald and they chase the townsend then they are minty. The townsend is minty.", "logic": "\nnot Bilge(thorvald, townsend)\nAmorphous(thorvald)\nGelatinise(thorvald, juditha)\nnot Mimeo(juditha, townsend)\nBilge(juditha, thorvald)\nnot Bilge(juditha, townsend)\nnot Hmong(juditha)\nMinty(juditha)\nnot Gelatinise(juditha, thorvald)\nGelatinise(juditha, townsend)\nnot Mimeo(townsend, thorvald)\nMimeo(townsend, juditha)\nBilge(townsend, thorvald)\nHmong(townsend)\nGelatinise(townsend, thorvald)\nforall x (Mimeo(x, juditha) -> Mimeo(x, townsend))\nforall x (Bilge(x, thorvald) and Mimeo(x, townsend) -> Minty(x))\n\nMinty(townsend)\n\nMimeo(townsend, juditha) and forall x (Mimeo(x, juditha) -> Mimeo(x, townsend)) -> therefore Mimeo(townsend, townsend) Bilge(townsend, thorvald) and Mimeo(townsend, townsend) and forall x (Bilge(x, thorvald) and Mimeo(x, townsend) -> Minty(x)) -> therefore Minty(townsend)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The flinn does not eat the nannie. The flinn is stagy. The flinn ticktack the sidonnie. The sidonnie does not chase the nannie. The sidonnie scamper the flinn. The sidonnie does not eat the nannie. The sidonnie is not pilary. The sidonnie is sliding. The sidonnie does not visit the flinn. The sidonnie ticktack the nannie. The nannie does not chase the flinn. The nannie mound the sidonnie. The nannie scamper the flinn. The nannie is pilary. The nannie ticktack the flinn. If someone mound the sidonnie then they chase the nannie. If someone scamper the flinn and they chase the nannie then they are sliding. The nannie is not sliding.", "logic": "\nnot Scamper(flinn, nannie)\nStagy(flinn)\nTicktack(flinn, sidonnie)\nnot Mound(sidonnie, nannie)\nScamper(sidonnie, flinn)\nnot Scamper(sidonnie, nannie)\nnot Pilary(sidonnie)\nSliding(sidonnie)\nnot Ticktack(sidonnie, flinn)\nTicktack(sidonnie, nannie)\nnot Mound(nannie, flinn)\nMound(nannie, sidonnie)\nScamper(nannie, flinn)\nPilary(nannie)\nTicktack(nannie, flinn)\nforall x (Mound(x, sidonnie) -> Mound(x, nannie))\nforall x (Scamper(x, flinn) and Mound(x, nannie) -> Sliding(x))\n\nnot Sliding(nannie)\n\nMound(nannie, sidonnie) and forall x (Mound(x, sidonnie) -> Mound(x, nannie)) -> therefore Mound(nannie, nannie) Scamper(nannie, flinn) and Mound(nannie, nannie) and forall x (Scamper(x, flinn) and Mound(x, nannie) -> Sliding(x)) -> therefore Sliding(nannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The stormy does not eat the roice. The stormy is pulverised. The stormy corduroy the andrus. The andrus does not chase the roice. The andrus garrote the stormy. The andrus does not eat the roice. The andrus is not actual. The andrus is anionic. The andrus does not visit the stormy. The andrus corduroy the roice. The roice does not chase the stormy. The roice plight the andrus. The roice garrote the stormy. The roice is actual. The roice corduroy the stormy. If someone plight the andrus then they chase the roice. If someone garrote the stormy and they chase the roice then they are anionic. The stormy is not anionic.", "logic": "\nnot Garrote(stormy, roice)\nPulverised(stormy)\nCorduroy(stormy, andrus)\nnot Plight(andrus, roice)\nGarrote(andrus, stormy)\nnot Garrote(andrus, roice)\nnot Actual(andrus)\nAnionic(andrus)\nnot Corduroy(andrus, stormy)\nCorduroy(andrus, roice)\nnot Plight(roice, stormy)\nPlight(roice, andrus)\nGarrote(roice, stormy)\nActual(roice)\nCorduroy(roice, stormy)\nforall x (Plight(x, andrus) -> Plight(x, roice))\nforall x (Garrote(x, stormy) and Plight(x, roice) -> Anionic(x))\n\nnot Anionic(stormy)\n\nforall x (Garrote(x, stormy) and Plight(x, roice) -> Anionic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The estrella does not eat the chriss. The estrella is incurvate. The estrella alert the ham. The ham does not chase the chriss. The ham burlesque the estrella. The ham does not eat the chriss. The ham is not thornless. The ham is gawky. The ham does not visit the estrella. The ham alert the chriss. The chriss does not chase the estrella. The chriss fund the ham. The chriss burlesque the estrella. The chriss is thornless. The chriss alert the estrella. If someone fund the ham then they chase the chriss. If someone burlesque the estrella and they chase the chriss then they are gawky. The estrella fund the chriss.", "logic": "\nnot Burlesque(estrella, chriss)\nIncurvate(estrella)\nAlert(estrella, ham)\nnot Fund(ham, chriss)\nBurlesque(ham, estrella)\nnot Burlesque(ham, chriss)\nnot Thornless(ham)\nGawky(ham)\nnot Alert(ham, estrella)\nAlert(ham, chriss)\nnot Fund(chriss, estrella)\nFund(chriss, ham)\nBurlesque(chriss, estrella)\nThornless(chriss)\nAlert(chriss, estrella)\nforall x (Fund(x, ham) -> Fund(x, chriss))\nforall x (Burlesque(x, estrella) and Fund(x, chriss) -> Gawky(x))\n\nFund(estrella, chriss)\n\nforall x (Fund(x, ham) -> Fund(x, chriss)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The ethelin does not eat the felita. The ethelin is twelfth. The ethelin blend the aubine. The aubine does not chase the felita. The aubine prance the ethelin. The aubine does not eat the felita. The aubine is not knightly. The aubine is vascular. The aubine does not visit the ethelin. The aubine blend the felita. The felita does not chase the ethelin. The felita mature the aubine. The felita prance the ethelin. The felita is knightly. The felita blend the ethelin. If someone mature the aubine then they chase the felita. If someone prance the ethelin and they chase the felita then they are vascular. The felita is not rough.", "logic": "\nnot Prance(ethelin, felita)\nTwelfth(ethelin)\nBlend(ethelin, aubine)\nnot Mature(aubine, felita)\nPrance(aubine, ethelin)\nnot Prance(aubine, felita)\nnot Knightly(aubine)\nVascular(aubine)\nnot Blend(aubine, ethelin)\nBlend(aubine, felita)\nnot Mature(felita, ethelin)\nMature(felita, aubine)\nPrance(felita, ethelin)\nKnightly(felita)\nBlend(felita, ethelin)\nforall x (Mature(x, aubine) -> Mature(x, felita))\nforall x (Prance(x, ethelin) and Mature(x, felita) -> Vascular(x))\n\nnot Rough(felita)\n\nnot Rough(felita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The esmerelda does not eat the rozanna. The esmerelda is deciding. The esmerelda carbonize the emmaline. The emmaline does not chase the rozanna. The emmaline burr the esmerelda. The emmaline does not eat the rozanna. The emmaline is not lacy. The emmaline is kyphotic. The emmaline does not visit the esmerelda. The emmaline carbonize the rozanna. The rozanna does not chase the esmerelda. The rozanna field the emmaline. The rozanna burr the esmerelda. The rozanna is lacy. The rozanna carbonize the esmerelda. If someone field the emmaline then they chase the rozanna. If someone burr the esmerelda and they chase the rozanna then they are kyphotic. The rozanna carbonize the emmaline.", "logic": "\nnot Burr(esmerelda, rozanna)\nDeciding(esmerelda)\nCarbonize(esmerelda, emmaline)\nnot Field(emmaline, rozanna)\nBurr(emmaline, esmerelda)\nnot Burr(emmaline, rozanna)\nnot Lacy(emmaline)\nKyphotic(emmaline)\nnot Carbonize(emmaline, esmerelda)\nCarbonize(emmaline, rozanna)\nnot Field(rozanna, esmerelda)\nField(rozanna, emmaline)\nBurr(rozanna, esmerelda)\nLacy(rozanna)\nCarbonize(rozanna, esmerelda)\nforall x (Field(x, emmaline) -> Field(x, rozanna))\nforall x (Burr(x, esmerelda) and Field(x, rozanna) -> Kyphotic(x))\n\nCarbonize(rozanna, emmaline)\n\nCarbonize(rozanna, emmaline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The latisha does not eat the hailey. The latisha is unthinking. The latisha moderate the redmond. The redmond does not chase the hailey. The redmond secern the latisha. The redmond does not eat the hailey. The redmond is not acyclic. The redmond is senior. The redmond does not visit the latisha. The redmond moderate the hailey. The hailey does not chase the latisha. The hailey sweeten the redmond. The hailey secern the latisha. The hailey is acyclic. The hailey moderate the latisha. If someone sweeten the redmond then they chase the hailey. If someone secern the latisha and they chase the hailey then they are senior. The hailey does not eat the redmond.", "logic": "\nnot Secern(latisha, hailey)\nUnthinking(latisha)\nModerate(latisha, redmond)\nnot Sweeten(redmond, hailey)\nSecern(redmond, latisha)\nnot Secern(redmond, hailey)\nnot Acyclic(redmond)\nSenior(redmond)\nnot Moderate(redmond, latisha)\nModerate(redmond, hailey)\nnot Sweeten(hailey, latisha)\nSweeten(hailey, redmond)\nSecern(hailey, latisha)\nAcyclic(hailey)\nModerate(hailey, latisha)\nforall x (Sweeten(x, redmond) -> Sweeten(x, hailey))\nforall x (Secern(x, latisha) and Sweeten(x, hailey) -> Senior(x))\n\nnot Secern(hailey, redmond)\n\nnot Secern(hailey, redmond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The percy does not eat the clarisa. The percy is unheeded. The percy convene the vivian. The vivian does not chase the clarisa. The vivian fertilise the percy. The vivian does not eat the clarisa. The vivian is not viselike. The vivian is reentrant. The vivian does not visit the percy. The vivian convene the clarisa. The clarisa does not chase the percy. The clarisa spot the vivian. The clarisa fertilise the percy. The clarisa is viselike. The clarisa convene the percy. If someone spot the vivian then they chase the clarisa. If someone fertilise the percy and they chase the clarisa then they are reentrant. The clarisa convene the clarisa.", "logic": "\nnot Fertilise(percy, clarisa)\nUnheeded(percy)\nConvene(percy, vivian)\nnot Spot(vivian, clarisa)\nFertilise(vivian, percy)\nnot Fertilise(vivian, clarisa)\nnot Viselike(vivian)\nReentrant(vivian)\nnot Convene(vivian, percy)\nConvene(vivian, clarisa)\nnot Spot(clarisa, percy)\nSpot(clarisa, vivian)\nFertilise(clarisa, percy)\nViselike(clarisa)\nConvene(clarisa, percy)\nforall x (Spot(x, vivian) -> Spot(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Fertilise(x, percy) and Spot(x, clarisa) -> Reentrant(x))\n\nConvene(clarisa, clarisa)\n\nConvene(clarisa, clarisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The tibold revivify the mariele. The tibold is thrilling. The tibold marbleize the lionel. The mariele revivify the tibold. The mariele is skyward. The mariele is slaveless. The mariele marbleize the lionel. The lionel is dishonored. The lionel is vernal. The lionel conga the tibold. If someone revivify the tibold then they visit the lionel. If someone conga the lionel and they eat the tibold then they eat the mariele. The mariele is slaveless.", "logic": "\nRevivify(tibold, mariele)\nThrilling(tibold)\nMarbleize(tibold, lionel)\nRevivify(mariele, tibold)\nSkyward(mariele)\nSlaveless(mariele)\nMarbleize(mariele, lionel)\nDishonored(lionel)\nVernal(lionel)\nConga(lionel, tibold)\nforall x (Revivify(x, tibold) -> Conga(x, lionel))\nforall x (Conga(x, lionel) and Revivify(x, tibold) -> Revivify(x, mariele))\n\nSlaveless(mariele)\n\ntherefore Slaveless(mariele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The morgana kite the erick. The morgana is estuarial. The morgana pamper the marita. The erick kite the morgana. The erick is automated. The erick is effortless. The erick pamper the marita. The marita is basilar. The marita is zymotic. The marita whisker the morgana. If someone kite the morgana then they visit the marita. If someone whisker the marita and they eat the morgana then they eat the erick. The morgana does not eat the erick.", "logic": "\nKite(morgana, erick)\nEstuarial(morgana)\nPamper(morgana, marita)\nKite(erick, morgana)\nAutomated(erick)\nEffortless(erick)\nPamper(erick, marita)\nBasilar(marita)\nZymotic(marita)\nWhisker(marita, morgana)\nforall x (Kite(x, morgana) -> Whisker(x, marita))\nforall x (Whisker(x, marita) and Kite(x, morgana) -> Kite(x, erick))\n\nnot Kite(morgana, erick)\n\ntherefore Kite(morgana, erick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The susette unburden the addie. The susette is burry. The susette create the brita. The addie unburden the susette. The addie is everyday. The addie is adaptive. The addie create the brita. The brita is vaporish. The brita is trichrome. The brita footle the susette. If someone unburden the susette then they visit the brita. If someone footle the brita and they eat the susette then they eat the addie. The addie footle the brita.", "logic": "\nUnburden(susette, addie)\nBurry(susette)\nCreate(susette, brita)\nUnburden(addie, susette)\nEveryday(addie)\nAdaptive(addie)\nCreate(addie, brita)\nVaporish(brita)\nTrichrome(brita)\nFootle(brita, susette)\nforall x (Unburden(x, susette) -> Footle(x, brita))\nforall x (Footle(x, brita) and Unburden(x, susette) -> Unburden(x, addie))\n\nFootle(addie, brita)\n\nUnburden(addie, susette) and forall x (Unburden(x, susette) -> Footle(x, brita)) -> therefore Footle(addie, brita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The lyndell disqualify the shelley. The lyndell is cuddlesome. The lyndell macadamize the steffie. The shelley disqualify the lyndell. The shelley is developing. The shelley is heuristic. The shelley macadamize the steffie. The steffie is historic. The steffie is setaceous. The steffie variegate the lyndell. If someone disqualify the lyndell then they visit the steffie. If someone variegate the steffie and they eat the lyndell then they eat the shelley. The shelley does not visit the steffie.", "logic": "\nDisqualify(lyndell, shelley)\nCuddlesome(lyndell)\nMacadamize(lyndell, steffie)\nDisqualify(shelley, lyndell)\nDeveloping(shelley)\nHeuristic(shelley)\nMacadamize(shelley, steffie)\nHistoric(steffie)\nSetaceous(steffie)\nVariegate(steffie, lyndell)\nforall x (Disqualify(x, lyndell) -> Variegate(x, steffie))\nforall x (Variegate(x, steffie) and Disqualify(x, lyndell) -> Disqualify(x, shelley))\n\nnot Variegate(shelley, steffie)\n\nDisqualify(shelley, lyndell) and forall x (Disqualify(x, lyndell) -> Variegate(x, steffie)) -> therefore Variegate(shelley, steffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The louisa sing the mikel. The louisa is classical. The louisa purify the mamie. The mikel sing the louisa. The mikel is buccal. The mikel is wigged. The mikel purify the mamie. The mamie is huxleyan. The mamie is secretory. The mamie deepen the louisa. If someone sing the louisa then they visit the mamie. If someone deepen the mamie and they eat the louisa then they eat the mikel. The mikel sing the mikel.", "logic": "\nSing(louisa, mikel)\nClassical(louisa)\nPurify(louisa, mamie)\nSing(mikel, louisa)\nBuccal(mikel)\nWigged(mikel)\nPurify(mikel, mamie)\nHuxleyan(mamie)\nSecretory(mamie)\nDeepen(mamie, louisa)\nforall x (Sing(x, louisa) -> Deepen(x, mamie))\nforall x (Deepen(x, mamie) and Sing(x, louisa) -> Sing(x, mikel))\n\nSing(mikel, mikel)\n\nSing(mikel, louisa) and forall x (Sing(x, louisa) -> Deepen(x, mamie)) -> therefore Deepen(mikel, mamie) Deepen(mikel, mamie) and Sing(mikel, louisa) and forall x (Deepen(x, mamie) and Sing(x, louisa) -> Sing(x, mikel)) -> therefore Sing(mikel, mikel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The mendie reshape the ronny. The mendie is allopatric. The mendie cowhide the betta. The ronny reshape the mendie. The ronny is divisible. The ronny is platonic. The ronny cowhide the betta. The betta is ambiguous. The betta is parky. The betta possess the mendie. If someone reshape the mendie then they visit the betta. If someone possess the betta and they eat the mendie then they eat the ronny. The ronny does not eat the ronny.", "logic": "\nReshape(mendie, ronny)\nAllopatric(mendie)\nCowhide(mendie, betta)\nReshape(ronny, mendie)\nDivisible(ronny)\nPlatonic(ronny)\nCowhide(ronny, betta)\nAmbiguous(betta)\nParky(betta)\nPossess(betta, mendie)\nforall x (Reshape(x, mendie) -> Possess(x, betta))\nforall x (Possess(x, betta) and Reshape(x, mendie) -> Reshape(x, ronny))\n\nnot Reshape(ronny, ronny)\n\nReshape(ronny, mendie) and forall x (Reshape(x, mendie) -> Possess(x, betta)) -> therefore Possess(ronny, betta) Possess(ronny, betta) and Reshape(ronny, mendie) and forall x (Possess(x, betta) and Reshape(x, mendie) -> Reshape(x, ronny)) -> therefore Reshape(ronny, ronny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The shina melanize the staci. The shina is blaring. The shina condemn the melosa. The staci melanize the shina. The staci is glamorous. The staci is deadening. The staci condemn the melosa. The melosa is athletic. The melosa is tutorial. The melosa shelve the shina. If someone melanize the shina then they visit the melosa. If someone shelve the melosa and they eat the shina then they eat the staci. The melosa does not eat the staci.", "logic": "\nMelanize(shina, staci)\nBlaring(shina)\nCondemn(shina, melosa)\nMelanize(staci, shina)\nGlamorous(staci)\nDeadening(staci)\nCondemn(staci, melosa)\nAthletic(melosa)\nTutorial(melosa)\nShelve(melosa, shina)\nforall x (Melanize(x, shina) -> Shelve(x, melosa))\nforall x (Shelve(x, melosa) and Melanize(x, shina) -> Melanize(x, staci))\n\nnot Melanize(melosa, staci)\n\nforall x (Shelve(x, melosa) and Melanize(x, shina) -> Melanize(x, staci)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The celisse shirr the rudie. The celisse is kechuan. The celisse abase the cam. The rudie shirr the celisse. The rudie is frilled. The rudie is stung. The rudie abase the cam. The cam is geophytic. The cam is larboard. The cam unfreeze the celisse. If someone shirr the celisse then they visit the cam. If someone unfreeze the cam and they eat the celisse then they eat the rudie. The celisse unfreeze the cam.", "logic": "\nShirr(celisse, rudie)\nKechuan(celisse)\nAbase(celisse, cam)\nShirr(rudie, celisse)\nFrilled(rudie)\nStung(rudie)\nAbase(rudie, cam)\nGeophytic(cam)\nLarboard(cam)\nUnfreeze(cam, celisse)\nforall x (Shirr(x, celisse) -> Unfreeze(x, cam))\nforall x (Unfreeze(x, cam) and Shirr(x, celisse) -> Shirr(x, rudie))\n\nUnfreeze(celisse, cam)\n\nforall x (Shirr(x, celisse) -> Unfreeze(x, cam)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The alice ideate the corrianne. The alice is ripened. The alice smirch the oralla. The corrianne ideate the alice. The corrianne is sapiential. The corrianne is bipartizan. The corrianne smirch the oralla. The oralla is chivalric. The oralla is oxonian. The oralla testify the alice. If someone ideate the alice then they visit the oralla. If someone testify the oralla and they eat the alice then they eat the corrianne. The oralla does not visit the oralla.", "logic": "\nIdeate(alice, corrianne)\nRipened(alice)\nSmirch(alice, oralla)\nIdeate(corrianne, alice)\nSapiential(corrianne)\nBipartizan(corrianne)\nSmirch(corrianne, oralla)\nChivalric(oralla)\nOxonian(oralla)\nTestify(oralla, alice)\nforall x (Ideate(x, alice) -> Testify(x, oralla))\nforall x (Testify(x, oralla) and Ideate(x, alice) -> Ideate(x, corrianne))\n\nnot Testify(oralla, oralla)\n\nforall x (Ideate(x, alice) -> Testify(x, oralla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The ailene honk the montague. The ailene is sceptical. The ailene teach the linus. The montague honk the ailene. The montague is carefree. The montague is beneficial. The montague teach the linus. The linus is lifeless. The linus is combinable. The linus watercolor the ailene. If someone honk the ailene then they visit the linus. If someone watercolor the linus and they eat the ailene then they eat the montague. The montague teach the montague.", "logic": "\nHonk(ailene, montague)\nSceptical(ailene)\nTeach(ailene, linus)\nHonk(montague, ailene)\nCarefree(montague)\nBeneficial(montague)\nTeach(montague, linus)\nLifeless(linus)\nCombinable(linus)\nWatercolor(linus, ailene)\nforall x (Honk(x, ailene) -> Watercolor(x, linus))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, linus) and Honk(x, ailene) -> Honk(x, montague))\n\nTeach(montague, montague)\n\nTeach(montague, montague) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The janine stalinise the lola. The janine is bionic. The janine berate the willette. The lola stalinise the janine. The lola is projected. The lola is lowered. The lola berate the willette. The willette is pareve. The willette is stomatal. The willette enable the janine. If someone stalinise the janine then they visit the willette. If someone enable the willette and they eat the janine then they eat the lola. The willette does not like the janine.", "logic": "\nStalinise(janine, lola)\nBionic(janine)\nBerate(janine, willette)\nStalinise(lola, janine)\nProjected(lola)\nLowered(lola)\nBerate(lola, willette)\nPareve(willette)\nStomatal(willette)\nEnable(willette, janine)\nforall x (Stalinise(x, janine) -> Enable(x, willette))\nforall x (Enable(x, willette) and Stalinise(x, janine) -> Stalinise(x, lola))\n\nnot Berate(willette, janine)\n\nnot Berate(willette, janine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The stacia laugh the ashely. The stacia is wide. The stacia misplay the thorny. The ashely laugh the stacia. The ashely is grasslike. The ashely is freakish. The ashely misplay the thorny. The thorny is baggy. The thorny is visceral. The thorny rerun the stacia. If someone laugh the stacia then they visit the thorny. If someone rerun the thorny and they eat the stacia then they eat the ashely. The stacia is grasslike.", "logic": "\nLaugh(stacia, ashely)\nWide(stacia)\nMisplay(stacia, thorny)\nLaugh(ashely, stacia)\nGrasslike(ashely)\nFreakish(ashely)\nMisplay(ashely, thorny)\nBaggy(thorny)\nVisceral(thorny)\nRerun(thorny, stacia)\nforall x (Laugh(x, stacia) -> Rerun(x, thorny))\nforall x (Rerun(x, thorny) and Laugh(x, stacia) -> Laugh(x, ashely))\n\nGrasslike(stacia)\n\nGrasslike(stacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The darien rinse the guthrie. The darien is not treasured. The darien is whispering. The darien undrape the guthrie. The darien does not visit the guthrie. The guthrie is befouled. The guthrie exhaust the darien. If the guthrie exhaust the darien and the darien does not eat the guthrie then the guthrie undrape the darien. If someone undrape the darien and the darien undrape the guthrie then they eat the darien. If someone undrape the darien and they do not eat the guthrie then the darien undrape the guthrie. If someone is befouled then they need the darien. If someone exhaust the guthrie and they do not eat the guthrie then they need the guthrie. If the guthrie is not moire then the guthrie is treasured. If someone rinse the guthrie then the guthrie is not liveried. If the guthrie is moire and the guthrie rinse the darien then the guthrie is not liveried. The darien rinse the guthrie.", "logic": "\nRinse(darien, guthrie)\nnot Treasured(darien)\nWhispering(darien)\nUndrape(darien, guthrie)\nnot Exhaust(darien, guthrie)\nBefouled(guthrie)\nExhaust(guthrie, darien)\nExhaust(guthrie, darien) and not Rinse(darien, guthrie) -> Undrape(guthrie, darien)\nforall x (Undrape(x, darien) and Undrape(darien, guthrie) -> Rinse(x, darien))\nforall x (Undrape(x, darien) and not Rinse(x, guthrie) -> Undrape(darien, guthrie))\nforall x (Befouled(x) -> Undrape(x, darien))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, guthrie) and not Rinse(x, guthrie) -> Undrape(x, guthrie))\nnot Moire(guthrie) -> Treasured(guthrie)\nforall x (Rinse(x, guthrie) -> not Liveried(guthrie))\nMoire(guthrie) and Rinse(guthrie, darien) -> not Liveried(guthrie)\n\nRinse(darien, guthrie)\n\ntherefore Rinse(darien, guthrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The chris nosedive the joab. The chris is not configured. The chris is synergetic. The chris prattle the joab. The chris does not visit the joab. The joab is endermatic. The joab glue the chris. If the joab glue the chris and the chris does not eat the joab then the joab prattle the chris. If someone prattle the chris and the chris prattle the joab then they eat the chris. If someone prattle the chris and they do not eat the joab then the chris prattle the joab. If someone is endermatic then they need the chris. If someone glue the joab and they do not eat the joab then they need the joab. If the joab is not birken then the joab is configured. If someone nosedive the joab then the joab is not squally. If the joab is birken and the joab nosedive the chris then the joab is not squally. The chris does not need the joab.", "logic": "\nNosedive(chris, joab)\nnot Configured(chris)\nSynergetic(chris)\nPrattle(chris, joab)\nnot Glue(chris, joab)\nEndermatic(joab)\nGlue(joab, chris)\nGlue(joab, chris) and not Nosedive(chris, joab) -> Prattle(joab, chris)\nforall x (Prattle(x, chris) and Prattle(chris, joab) -> Nosedive(x, chris))\nforall x (Prattle(x, chris) and not Nosedive(x, joab) -> Prattle(chris, joab))\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Prattle(x, chris))\nforall x (Glue(x, joab) and not Nosedive(x, joab) -> Prattle(x, joab))\nnot Birken(joab) -> Configured(joab)\nforall x (Nosedive(x, joab) -> not Squally(joab))\nBirken(joab) and Nosedive(joab, chris) -> not Squally(joab)\n\nnot Prattle(chris, joab)\n\ntherefore Prattle(chris, joab)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The analise weekend the luanna. The analise is not unshaded. The analise is tutelar. The analise seesaw the luanna. The analise does not visit the luanna. The luanna is evoked. The luanna bamboozle the analise. If the luanna bamboozle the analise and the analise does not eat the luanna then the luanna seesaw the analise. If someone seesaw the analise and the analise seesaw the luanna then they eat the analise. If someone seesaw the analise and they do not eat the luanna then the analise seesaw the luanna. If someone is evoked then they need the analise. If someone bamboozle the luanna and they do not eat the luanna then they need the luanna. If the luanna is not buckram then the luanna is unshaded. If someone weekend the luanna then the luanna is not tawdry. If the luanna is buckram and the luanna weekend the analise then the luanna is not tawdry. The luanna is not tawdry.", "logic": "\nWeekend(analise, luanna)\nnot Unshaded(analise)\nTutelar(analise)\nSeesaw(analise, luanna)\nnot Bamboozle(analise, luanna)\nEvoked(luanna)\nBamboozle(luanna, analise)\nBamboozle(luanna, analise) and not Weekend(analise, luanna) -> Seesaw(luanna, analise)\nforall x (Seesaw(x, analise) and Seesaw(analise, luanna) -> Weekend(x, analise))\nforall x (Seesaw(x, analise) and not Weekend(x, luanna) -> Seesaw(analise, luanna))\nforall x (Evoked(x) -> Seesaw(x, analise))\nforall x (Bamboozle(x, luanna) and not Weekend(x, luanna) -> Seesaw(x, luanna))\nnot Buckram(luanna) -> Unshaded(luanna)\nforall x (Weekend(x, luanna) -> not Tawdry(luanna))\nBuckram(luanna) and Weekend(luanna, analise) -> not Tawdry(luanna)\n\nnot Tawdry(luanna)\n\nWeekend(analise, luanna) and forall x (Weekend(x, luanna) -> not Tawdry(luanna)) -> therefore not Tawdry(luanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The josi taboo the keely. The josi is not fried. The josi is inverse. The josi bait the keely. The josi does not visit the keely. The keely is rummy. The keely interlope the josi. If the keely interlope the josi and the josi does not eat the keely then the keely bait the josi. If someone bait the josi and the josi bait the keely then they eat the josi. If someone bait the josi and they do not eat the keely then the josi bait the keely. If someone is rummy then they need the josi. If someone interlope the keely and they do not eat the keely then they need the keely. If the keely is not reclusive then the keely is fried. If someone taboo the keely then the keely is not revived. If the keely is reclusive and the keely taboo the josi then the keely is not revived. The keely does not need the josi.", "logic": "\nTaboo(josi, keely)\nnot Fried(josi)\nInverse(josi)\nBait(josi, keely)\nnot Interlope(josi, keely)\nRummy(keely)\nInterlope(keely, josi)\nInterlope(keely, josi) and not Taboo(josi, keely) -> Bait(keely, josi)\nforall x (Bait(x, josi) and Bait(josi, keely) -> Taboo(x, josi))\nforall x (Bait(x, josi) and not Taboo(x, keely) -> Bait(josi, keely))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Bait(x, josi))\nforall x (Interlope(x, keely) and not Taboo(x, keely) -> Bait(x, keely))\nnot Reclusive(keely) -> Fried(keely)\nforall x (Taboo(x, keely) -> not Revived(keely))\nReclusive(keely) and Taboo(keely, josi) -> not Revived(keely)\n\nnot Bait(keely, josi)\n\nRummy(keely) and forall x (Rummy(x) -> Bait(x, josi)) -> therefore Bait(keely, josi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The dirk chiromance the shani. The dirk is not slouchy. The dirk is copular. The dirk dynamize the shani. The dirk does not visit the shani. The shani is virucidal. The shani miter the dirk. If the shani miter the dirk and the dirk does not eat the shani then the shani dynamize the dirk. If someone dynamize the dirk and the dirk dynamize the shani then they eat the dirk. If someone dynamize the dirk and they do not eat the shani then the dirk dynamize the shani. If someone is virucidal then they need the dirk. If someone miter the shani and they do not eat the shani then they need the shani. If the shani is not embryonal then the shani is slouchy. If someone chiromance the shani then the shani is not portuguese. If the shani is embryonal and the shani chiromance the dirk then the shani is not portuguese. The shani chiromance the dirk.", "logic": "\nChiromance(dirk, shani)\nnot Slouchy(dirk)\nCopular(dirk)\nDynamize(dirk, shani)\nnot Miter(dirk, shani)\nVirucidal(shani)\nMiter(shani, dirk)\nMiter(shani, dirk) and not Chiromance(dirk, shani) -> Dynamize(shani, dirk)\nforall x (Dynamize(x, dirk) and Dynamize(dirk, shani) -> Chiromance(x, dirk))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, dirk) and not Chiromance(x, shani) -> Dynamize(dirk, shani))\nforall x (Virucidal(x) -> Dynamize(x, dirk))\nforall x (Miter(x, shani) and not Chiromance(x, shani) -> Dynamize(x, shani))\nnot Embryonal(shani) -> Slouchy(shani)\nforall x (Chiromance(x, shani) -> not Portuguese(shani))\nEmbryonal(shani) and Chiromance(shani, dirk) -> not Portuguese(shani)\n\nChiromance(shani, dirk)\n\nVirucidal(shani) and forall x (Virucidal(x) -> Dynamize(x, dirk)) -> therefore Dynamize(shani, dirk) Dynamize(shani, dirk) and Dynamize(dirk, shani) and forall x (Dynamize(x, dirk) and Dynamize(dirk, shani) -> Chiromance(x, dirk)) -> therefore Chiromance(shani, dirk)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The alaine leech the alys. The alaine is not shuddery. The alaine is focal. The alaine mastermind the alys. The alaine does not visit the alys. The alys is provencal. The alys steamroll the alaine. If the alys steamroll the alaine and the alaine does not eat the alys then the alys mastermind the alaine. If someone mastermind the alaine and the alaine mastermind the alys then they eat the alaine. If someone mastermind the alaine and they do not eat the alys then the alaine mastermind the alys. If someone is provencal then they need the alaine. If someone steamroll the alys and they do not eat the alys then they need the alys. If the alys is not tame then the alys is shuddery. If someone leech the alys then the alys is not envious. If the alys is tame and the alys leech the alaine then the alys is not envious. The alys does not eat the alaine.", "logic": "\nLeech(alaine, alys)\nnot Shuddery(alaine)\nFocal(alaine)\nMastermind(alaine, alys)\nnot Steamroll(alaine, alys)\nProvencal(alys)\nSteamroll(alys, alaine)\nSteamroll(alys, alaine) and not Leech(alaine, alys) -> Mastermind(alys, alaine)\nforall x (Mastermind(x, alaine) and Mastermind(alaine, alys) -> Leech(x, alaine))\nforall x (Mastermind(x, alaine) and not Leech(x, alys) -> Mastermind(alaine, alys))\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> Mastermind(x, alaine))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, alys) and not Leech(x, alys) -> Mastermind(x, alys))\nnot Tame(alys) -> Shuddery(alys)\nforall x (Leech(x, alys) -> not Envious(alys))\nTame(alys) and Leech(alys, alaine) -> not Envious(alys)\n\nnot Leech(alys, alaine)\n\nProvencal(alys) and forall x (Provencal(x) -> Mastermind(x, alaine)) -> therefore Mastermind(alys, alaine) Mastermind(alys, alaine) and Mastermind(alaine, alys) and forall x (Mastermind(x, alaine) and Mastermind(alaine, alys) -> Leech(x, alaine)) -> therefore Leech(alys, alaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The gennie hunger the riccardo. The gennie is not suppressed. The gennie is opposed. The gennie bloom the riccardo. The gennie does not visit the riccardo. The riccardo is structural. The riccardo spade the gennie. If the riccardo spade the gennie and the gennie does not eat the riccardo then the riccardo bloom the gennie. If someone bloom the gennie and the gennie bloom the riccardo then they eat the gennie. If someone bloom the gennie and they do not eat the riccardo then the gennie bloom the riccardo. If someone is structural then they need the gennie. If someone spade the riccardo and they do not eat the riccardo then they need the riccardo. If the riccardo is not wooly then the riccardo is suppressed. If someone hunger the riccardo then the riccardo is not partizan. If the riccardo is wooly and the riccardo hunger the gennie then the riccardo is not partizan. The gennie does not need the gennie.", "logic": "\nHunger(gennie, riccardo)\nnot Suppressed(gennie)\nOpposed(gennie)\nBloom(gennie, riccardo)\nnot Spade(gennie, riccardo)\nStructural(riccardo)\nSpade(riccardo, gennie)\nSpade(riccardo, gennie) and not Hunger(gennie, riccardo) -> Bloom(riccardo, gennie)\nforall x (Bloom(x, gennie) and Bloom(gennie, riccardo) -> Hunger(x, gennie))\nforall x (Bloom(x, gennie) and not Hunger(x, riccardo) -> Bloom(gennie, riccardo))\nforall x (Structural(x) -> Bloom(x, gennie))\nforall x (Spade(x, riccardo) and not Hunger(x, riccardo) -> Bloom(x, riccardo))\nnot Wooly(riccardo) -> Suppressed(riccardo)\nforall x (Hunger(x, riccardo) -> not Partizan(riccardo))\nWooly(riccardo) and Hunger(riccardo, gennie) -> not Partizan(riccardo)\n\nnot Bloom(gennie, gennie)\n\nforall x (Structural(x) -> Bloom(x, gennie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The roanna ignore the sallyanne. The roanna is not demagogic. The roanna is unerring. The roanna bugger the sallyanne. The roanna does not visit the sallyanne. The sallyanne is comforting. The sallyanne refracture the roanna. If the sallyanne refracture the roanna and the roanna does not eat the sallyanne then the sallyanne bugger the roanna. If someone bugger the roanna and the roanna bugger the sallyanne then they eat the roanna. If someone bugger the roanna and they do not eat the sallyanne then the roanna bugger the sallyanne. If someone is comforting then they need the roanna. If someone refracture the sallyanne and they do not eat the sallyanne then they need the sallyanne. If the sallyanne is not sintered then the sallyanne is demagogic. If someone ignore the sallyanne then the sallyanne is not romanist. If the sallyanne is sintered and the sallyanne ignore the roanna then the sallyanne is not romanist. The roanna ignore the roanna.", "logic": "\nIgnore(roanna, sallyanne)\nnot Demagogic(roanna)\nUnerring(roanna)\nBugger(roanna, sallyanne)\nnot Refracture(roanna, sallyanne)\nComforting(sallyanne)\nRefracture(sallyanne, roanna)\nRefracture(sallyanne, roanna) and not Ignore(roanna, sallyanne) -> Bugger(sallyanne, roanna)\nforall x (Bugger(x, roanna) and Bugger(roanna, sallyanne) -> Ignore(x, roanna))\nforall x (Bugger(x, roanna) and not Ignore(x, sallyanne) -> Bugger(roanna, sallyanne))\nforall x (Comforting(x) -> Bugger(x, roanna))\nforall x (Refracture(x, sallyanne) and not Ignore(x, sallyanne) -> Bugger(x, sallyanne))\nnot Sintered(sallyanne) -> Demagogic(sallyanne)\nforall x (Ignore(x, sallyanne) -> not Romanist(sallyanne))\nSintered(sallyanne) and Ignore(sallyanne, roanna) -> not Romanist(sallyanne)\n\nIgnore(roanna, roanna)\n\nforall x (Bugger(x, roanna) and Bugger(roanna, sallyanne) -> Ignore(x, roanna)) <- forall x (Comforting(x) -> Bugger(x, roanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The philippe impose the izabel. The philippe is not idiopathic. The philippe is lesbian. The philippe besot the izabel. The philippe does not visit the izabel. The izabel is jetting. The izabel saunter the philippe. If the izabel saunter the philippe and the philippe does not eat the izabel then the izabel besot the philippe. If someone besot the philippe and the philippe besot the izabel then they eat the philippe. If someone besot the philippe and they do not eat the izabel then the philippe besot the izabel. If someone is jetting then they need the philippe. If someone saunter the izabel and they do not eat the izabel then they need the izabel. If the izabel is not foamy then the izabel is idiopathic. If someone impose the izabel then the izabel is not magyar. If the izabel is foamy and the izabel impose the philippe then the izabel is not magyar. The izabel does not need the izabel.", "logic": "\nImpose(philippe, izabel)\nnot Idiopathic(philippe)\nLesbian(philippe)\nBesot(philippe, izabel)\nnot Saunter(philippe, izabel)\nJetting(izabel)\nSaunter(izabel, philippe)\nSaunter(izabel, philippe) and not Impose(philippe, izabel) -> Besot(izabel, philippe)\nforall x (Besot(x, philippe) and Besot(philippe, izabel) -> Impose(x, philippe))\nforall x (Besot(x, philippe) and not Impose(x, izabel) -> Besot(philippe, izabel))\nforall x (Jetting(x) -> Besot(x, philippe))\nforall x (Saunter(x, izabel) and not Impose(x, izabel) -> Besot(x, izabel))\nnot Foamy(izabel) -> Idiopathic(izabel)\nforall x (Impose(x, izabel) -> not Magyar(izabel))\nFoamy(izabel) and Impose(izabel, philippe) -> not Magyar(izabel)\n\nnot Besot(izabel, izabel)\n\nforall x (Saunter(x, izabel) and not Impose(x, izabel) -> Besot(x, izabel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The yancey cakewalk the cathyleen. The yancey is not licked. The yancey is biparous. The yancey droop the cathyleen. The yancey does not visit the cathyleen. The cathyleen is foetal. The cathyleen sleet the yancey. If the cathyleen sleet the yancey and the yancey does not eat the cathyleen then the cathyleen droop the yancey. If someone droop the yancey and the yancey droop the cathyleen then they eat the yancey. If someone droop the yancey and they do not eat the cathyleen then the yancey droop the cathyleen. If someone is foetal then they need the yancey. If someone sleet the cathyleen and they do not eat the cathyleen then they need the cathyleen. If the cathyleen is not annoying then the cathyleen is licked. If someone cakewalk the cathyleen then the cathyleen is not tiny. If the cathyleen is annoying and the cathyleen cakewalk the yancey then the cathyleen is not tiny. The cathyleen is biparous.", "logic": "\nCakewalk(yancey, cathyleen)\nnot Licked(yancey)\nBiparous(yancey)\nDroop(yancey, cathyleen)\nnot Sleet(yancey, cathyleen)\nFoetal(cathyleen)\nSleet(cathyleen, yancey)\nSleet(cathyleen, yancey) and not Cakewalk(yancey, cathyleen) -> Droop(cathyleen, yancey)\nforall x (Droop(x, yancey) and Droop(yancey, cathyleen) -> Cakewalk(x, yancey))\nforall x (Droop(x, yancey) and not Cakewalk(x, cathyleen) -> Droop(yancey, cathyleen))\nforall x (Foetal(x) -> Droop(x, yancey))\nforall x (Sleet(x, cathyleen) and not Cakewalk(x, cathyleen) -> Droop(x, cathyleen))\nnot Annoying(cathyleen) -> Licked(cathyleen)\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, cathyleen) -> not Tiny(cathyleen))\nAnnoying(cathyleen) and Cakewalk(cathyleen, yancey) -> not Tiny(cathyleen)\n\nBiparous(cathyleen)\n\nBiparous(cathyleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The lelia cognize the bunnie. The lelia is not spacial. The lelia is orgiastic. The lelia replete the bunnie. The lelia does not visit the bunnie. The bunnie is adrift. The bunnie refreshen the lelia. If the bunnie refreshen the lelia and the lelia does not eat the bunnie then the bunnie replete the lelia. If someone replete the lelia and the lelia replete the bunnie then they eat the lelia. If someone replete the lelia and they do not eat the bunnie then the lelia replete the bunnie. If someone is adrift then they need the lelia. If someone refreshen the bunnie and they do not eat the bunnie then they need the bunnie. If the bunnie is not montane then the bunnie is spacial. If someone cognize the bunnie then the bunnie is not obliging. If the bunnie is montane and the bunnie cognize the lelia then the bunnie is not obliging. The lelia does not visit the lelia.", "logic": "\nCognize(lelia, bunnie)\nnot Spacial(lelia)\nOrgiastic(lelia)\nReplete(lelia, bunnie)\nnot Refreshen(lelia, bunnie)\nAdrift(bunnie)\nRefreshen(bunnie, lelia)\nRefreshen(bunnie, lelia) and not Cognize(lelia, bunnie) -> Replete(bunnie, lelia)\nforall x (Replete(x, lelia) and Replete(lelia, bunnie) -> Cognize(x, lelia))\nforall x (Replete(x, lelia) and not Cognize(x, bunnie) -> Replete(lelia, bunnie))\nforall x (Adrift(x) -> Replete(x, lelia))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, bunnie) and not Cognize(x, bunnie) -> Replete(x, bunnie))\nnot Montane(bunnie) -> Spacial(bunnie)\nforall x (Cognize(x, bunnie) -> not Obliging(bunnie))\nMontane(bunnie) and Cognize(bunnie, lelia) -> not Obliging(bunnie)\n\nnot Refreshen(lelia, lelia)\n\nnot Refreshen(lelia, lelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "The dyanne equalise the vonnie. The dyanne is not decorated. The dyanne is kampuchean. The dyanne engulf the vonnie. The dyanne does not visit the vonnie. The vonnie is divisive. The vonnie recode the dyanne. If the vonnie recode the dyanne and the dyanne does not eat the vonnie then the vonnie engulf the dyanne. If someone engulf the dyanne and the dyanne engulf the vonnie then they eat the dyanne. If someone engulf the dyanne and they do not eat the vonnie then the dyanne engulf the vonnie. If someone is divisive then they need the dyanne. If someone recode the vonnie and they do not eat the vonnie then they need the vonnie. If the vonnie is not milanese then the vonnie is decorated. If someone equalise the vonnie then the vonnie is not doctorial. If the vonnie is milanese and the vonnie equalise the dyanne then the vonnie is not doctorial. The dyanne is divisive.", "logic": "\nEqualise(dyanne, vonnie)\nnot Decorated(dyanne)\nKampuchean(dyanne)\nEngulf(dyanne, vonnie)\nnot Recode(dyanne, vonnie)\nDivisive(vonnie)\nRecode(vonnie, dyanne)\nRecode(vonnie, dyanne) and not Equalise(dyanne, vonnie) -> Engulf(vonnie, dyanne)\nforall x (Engulf(x, dyanne) and Engulf(dyanne, vonnie) -> Equalise(x, dyanne))\nforall x (Engulf(x, dyanne) and not Equalise(x, vonnie) -> Engulf(dyanne, vonnie))\nforall x (Divisive(x) -> Engulf(x, dyanne))\nforall x (Recode(x, vonnie) and not Equalise(x, vonnie) -> Engulf(x, vonnie))\nnot Milanese(vonnie) -> Decorated(vonnie)\nforall x (Equalise(x, vonnie) -> not Doctorial(vonnie))\nMilanese(vonnie) and Equalise(vonnie, dyanne) -> not Doctorial(vonnie)\n\nDivisive(dyanne)\n\nDivisive(dyanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Aylmer is asteriated. Aylmer is rabbinical. Sharra is vagrant. Sharra is stigmatic. Sharra is stilly. Sharra is not untalented. Nettie is asteriated. Nettie is stilly. Nettie is untalented. Lenard is vagrant. Cold people are stilly. Quiet people are stigmatic. If Lenard is untalented then Lenard is not stigmatic. Aylmer is asteriated.", "logic": "\nAsteriated(aylmer)\nRabbinical(aylmer)\nVagrant(sharra)\nStigmatic(sharra)\nStilly(sharra)\nnot Untalented(sharra)\nAsteriated(nettie)\nStilly(nettie)\nUntalented(nettie)\nVagrant(lenard)\nforall x (Asteriated(x) -> Stilly(x))\nforall x (Stilly(x) -> Stigmatic(x))\nUntalented(lenard) -> not Stigmatic(lenard)\n\nAsteriated(aylmer)\n\ntherefore Asteriated(aylmer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Phillida is bosomy. Phillida is vulcanized. Goober is composed. Goober is stunned. Goober is idempotent. Goober is not podlike. Dyane is bosomy. Dyane is idempotent. Dyane is podlike. Maye is composed. Cold people are idempotent. Quiet people are stunned. If Maye is podlike then Maye is not stunned. Goober is not composed.", "logic": "\nBosomy(phillida)\nVulcanized(phillida)\nComposed(goober)\nStunned(goober)\nIdempotent(goober)\nnot Podlike(goober)\nBosomy(dyane)\nIdempotent(dyane)\nPodlike(dyane)\nComposed(maye)\nforall x (Bosomy(x) -> Idempotent(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) -> Stunned(x))\nPodlike(maye) -> not Stunned(maye)\n\nnot Composed(goober)\n\ntherefore Composed(goober)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Gerladina is penial. Gerladina is exquisite. Jesse is fated. Jesse is barebacked. Jesse is lotic. Jesse is not creaky. Ailene is penial. Ailene is lotic. Ailene is creaky. Roby is fated. Cold people are lotic. Quiet people are barebacked. If Roby is creaky then Roby is not barebacked. Gerladina is lotic.", "logic": "\nPenial(gerladina)\nExquisite(gerladina)\nFated(jesse)\nBarebacked(jesse)\nLotic(jesse)\nnot Creaky(jesse)\nPenial(ailene)\nLotic(ailene)\nCreaky(ailene)\nFated(roby)\nforall x (Penial(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) -> Barebacked(x))\nCreaky(roby) -> not Barebacked(roby)\n\nLotic(gerladina)\n\nPenial(gerladina) and forall x (Penial(x) -> Lotic(x)) -> therefore Lotic(gerladina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Garfinkel is squarish. Garfinkel is prevailing. Kylynn is ingrowing. Kylynn is unsorted. Kylynn is unmourned. Kylynn is not statuary. Emelita is squarish. Emelita is unmourned. Emelita is statuary. Neila is ingrowing. Cold people are unmourned. Quiet people are unsorted. If Neila is statuary then Neila is not unsorted. Emelita is not unsorted.", "logic": "\nSquarish(garfinkel)\nPrevailing(garfinkel)\nIngrowing(kylynn)\nUnsorted(kylynn)\nUnmourned(kylynn)\nnot Statuary(kylynn)\nSquarish(emelita)\nUnmourned(emelita)\nStatuary(emelita)\nIngrowing(neila)\nforall x (Squarish(x) -> Unmourned(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) -> Unsorted(x))\nStatuary(neila) -> not Unsorted(neila)\n\nnot Unsorted(emelita)\n\nUnmourned(emelita) and forall x (Unmourned(x) -> Unsorted(x)) -> therefore Unsorted(emelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Abe is tripinnate. Abe is bellied. Doris is imprecise. Doris is hidrotic. Doris is convolute. Doris is not pledged. Estele is tripinnate. Estele is convolute. Estele is pledged. Fenelia is imprecise. Cold people are convolute. Quiet people are hidrotic. If Fenelia is pledged then Fenelia is not hidrotic. Abe is hidrotic.", "logic": "\nTripinnate(abe)\nBellied(abe)\nImprecise(doris)\nHidrotic(doris)\nConvolute(doris)\nnot Pledged(doris)\nTripinnate(estele)\nConvolute(estele)\nPledged(estele)\nImprecise(fenelia)\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Hidrotic(x))\nPledged(fenelia) -> not Hidrotic(fenelia)\n\nHidrotic(abe)\n\nTripinnate(abe) and forall x (Tripinnate(x) -> Convolute(x)) -> therefore Convolute(abe) Convolute(abe) and forall x (Convolute(x) -> Hidrotic(x)) -> therefore Hidrotic(abe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Troy is galactic. Troy is appressed. Torre is yellow. Torre is ribbed. Torre is dogmatic. Torre is not faveolate. Otes is galactic. Otes is dogmatic. Otes is faveolate. Aggy is yellow. Cold people are dogmatic. Quiet people are ribbed. If Aggy is faveolate then Aggy is not ribbed. Troy is not ribbed.", "logic": "\nGalactic(troy)\nAppressed(troy)\nYellow(torre)\nRibbed(torre)\nDogmatic(torre)\nnot Faveolate(torre)\nGalactic(otes)\nDogmatic(otes)\nFaveolate(otes)\nYellow(aggy)\nforall x (Galactic(x) -> Dogmatic(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Ribbed(x))\nFaveolate(aggy) -> not Ribbed(aggy)\n\nnot Ribbed(troy)\n\nGalactic(troy) and forall x (Galactic(x) -> Dogmatic(x)) -> therefore Dogmatic(troy) Dogmatic(troy) and forall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Ribbed(x)) -> therefore Ribbed(troy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Stoddard is dying. Stoddard is morganatic. Amalee is iridaceous. Amalee is motivative. Amalee is bookable. Amalee is not bentonitic. Christean is dying. Christean is bookable. Christean is bentonitic. Raymond is iridaceous. Cold people are bookable. Quiet people are motivative. If Raymond is bentonitic then Raymond is not motivative. Raymond is not motivative.", "logic": "\nDying(stoddard)\nMorganatic(stoddard)\nIridaceous(amalee)\nMotivative(amalee)\nBookable(amalee)\nnot Bentonitic(amalee)\nDying(christean)\nBookable(christean)\nBentonitic(christean)\nIridaceous(raymond)\nforall x (Dying(x) -> Bookable(x))\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Motivative(x))\nBentonitic(raymond) -> not Motivative(raymond)\n\nnot Motivative(raymond)\n\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Motivative(x)) <- forall x (Dying(x) -> Bookable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Manish is nomadic. Manish is estival. Terrianne is latin. Terrianne is agone. Terrianne is holey. Terrianne is not threadlike. Chickie is nomadic. Chickie is holey. Chickie is threadlike. Ellissa is latin. Cold people are holey. Quiet people are agone. If Ellissa is threadlike then Ellissa is not agone. Ellissa is holey.", "logic": "\nNomadic(manish)\nEstival(manish)\nLatin(terrianne)\nAgone(terrianne)\nHoley(terrianne)\nnot Threadlike(terrianne)\nNomadic(chickie)\nHoley(chickie)\nThreadlike(chickie)\nLatin(ellissa)\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Holey(x))\nforall x (Holey(x) -> Agone(x))\nThreadlike(ellissa) -> not Agone(ellissa)\n\nHoley(ellissa)\n\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Holey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Rhianna is fleshy. Rhianna is cyan. Juliane is choked. Juliane is theocratic. Juliane is saxicoline. Juliane is not unkindly. Idaline is fleshy. Idaline is saxicoline. Idaline is unkindly. Lorry is choked. Cold people are saxicoline. Quiet people are theocratic. If Lorry is unkindly then Lorry is not theocratic. Lorry is not fleshy.", "logic": "\nFleshy(rhianna)\nCyan(rhianna)\nChoked(juliane)\nTheocratic(juliane)\nSaxicoline(juliane)\nnot Unkindly(juliane)\nFleshy(idaline)\nSaxicoline(idaline)\nUnkindly(idaline)\nChoked(lorry)\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Theocratic(x))\nUnkindly(lorry) -> not Theocratic(lorry)\n\nnot Fleshy(lorry)\n\nnot Fleshy(lorry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Erwin is endozoic. Erwin is uninfected. Mina is hydrated. Mina is monotonous. Mina is euclidian. Mina is not inventive. Jeffie is endozoic. Jeffie is euclidian. Jeffie is inventive. Uta is hydrated. Cold people are euclidian. Quiet people are monotonous. If Uta is inventive then Uta is not monotonous. Erwin is kind.", "logic": "\nEndozoic(erwin)\nUninfected(erwin)\nHydrated(mina)\nMonotonous(mina)\nEuclidian(mina)\nnot Inventive(mina)\nEndozoic(jeffie)\nEuclidian(jeffie)\nInventive(jeffie)\nHydrated(uta)\nforall x (Endozoic(x) -> Euclidian(x))\nforall x (Euclidian(x) -> Monotonous(x))\nInventive(uta) -> not Monotonous(uta)\n\nKind(erwin)\n\nKind(erwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Allianora is bromic. Allianora is cuneal. Glenna is skewed. Glenna is disclosed. Glenna is infeasible. Glenna is not precious. Marcy is bromic. Marcy is infeasible. Marcy is precious. Olwen is skewed. Cold people are infeasible. Quiet people are disclosed. If Olwen is precious then Olwen is not disclosed. Allianora is not precious.", "logic": "\nBromic(allianora)\nCuneal(allianora)\nSkewed(glenna)\nDisclosed(glenna)\nInfeasible(glenna)\nnot Precious(glenna)\nBromic(marcy)\nInfeasible(marcy)\nPrecious(marcy)\nSkewed(olwen)\nforall x (Bromic(x) -> Infeasible(x))\nforall x (Infeasible(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nPrecious(olwen) -> not Disclosed(olwen)\n\nnot Precious(allianora)\n\nnot Precious(allianora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Babette is priggish. Babette is hypothetic. Heda is startled. Heda is viceregal. Heda is tall. Heda is not complete. Aubert is priggish. Aubert is tall. Aubert is complete. Warren is startled. Cold people are tall. Quiet people are viceregal. If Warren is complete then Warren is not viceregal. Warren is hypothetic.", "logic": "\nPriggish(babette)\nHypothetic(babette)\nStartled(heda)\nViceregal(heda)\nTall(heda)\nnot Complete(heda)\nPriggish(aubert)\nTall(aubert)\nComplete(aubert)\nStartled(warren)\nforall x (Priggish(x) -> Tall(x))\nforall x (Tall(x) -> Viceregal(x))\nComplete(warren) -> not Viceregal(warren)\n\nHypothetic(warren)\n\nHypothetic(warren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1746"} {"premises": "Ethelind is mailed. Stefanie is intrusive. All mailed people are frontmost. Red, mailed people are frontmost. All frontmost, mailed people are cuspidal. Rough, mailed people are incursive. All puissant, incursive people are cuspidal. Kind people are frontmost. All frontmost people are intrusive. If Stefanie is puissant and Stefanie is mailed then Stefanie is cuspidal. Stefanie is intrusive.", "logic": "\nMailed(ethelind)\nIntrusive(stefanie)\nforall x (Mailed(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Incursive(x) and Mailed(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) and Mailed(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Intrusive(x) and Mailed(x) -> Incursive(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) and Incursive(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) -> Intrusive(x))\nPuissant(stefanie) and Mailed(stefanie) -> Cuspidal(stefanie)\n\nIntrusive(stefanie)\n\ntherefore Intrusive(stefanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Rheba is unilateral. Nedi is tactical. All unilateral people are semestrial. Red, unilateral people are semestrial. All semestrial, unilateral people are canonist. Rough, unilateral people are mystified. All witless, mystified people are canonist. Kind people are semestrial. All semestrial people are tactical. If Nedi is witless and Nedi is unilateral then Nedi is canonist. Nedi is not tactical.", "logic": "\nUnilateral(rheba)\nTactical(nedi)\nforall x (Unilateral(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Mystified(x) and Unilateral(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) and Unilateral(x) -> Canonist(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Unilateral(x) -> Mystified(x))\nforall x (Witless(x) and Mystified(x) -> Canonist(x))\nforall x (Witless(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) -> Tactical(x))\nWitless(nedi) and Unilateral(nedi) -> Canonist(nedi)\n\nnot Tactical(nedi)\n\ntherefore Tactical(nedi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Inge is potted. Towney is zonary. All potted people are inoperable. Red, potted people are inoperable. All inoperable, potted people are stupid. Rough, potted people are procedural. All contrasty, procedural people are stupid. Kind people are inoperable. All inoperable people are zonary. If Towney is contrasty and Towney is potted then Towney is stupid. Inge is inoperable.", "logic": "\nPotted(inge)\nZonary(towney)\nforall x (Potted(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Procedural(x) and Potted(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) and Potted(x) -> Stupid(x))\nforall x (Zonary(x) and Potted(x) -> Procedural(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) and Procedural(x) -> Stupid(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) -> Zonary(x))\nContrasty(towney) and Potted(towney) -> Stupid(towney)\n\nInoperable(inge)\n\nPotted(inge) and forall x (Potted(x) -> Inoperable(x)) -> therefore Inoperable(inge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Courtenay is bare. Rena is conjunct. All bare people are broke. Red, bare people are broke. All broke, bare people are concluding. Rough, bare people are umpteenth. All stupefied, umpteenth people are concluding. Kind people are broke. All broke people are conjunct. If Rena is stupefied and Rena is bare then Rena is concluding. Courtenay is not broke.", "logic": "\nBare(courtenay)\nConjunct(rena)\nforall x (Bare(x) -> Broke(x))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) and Bare(x) -> Broke(x))\nforall x (Broke(x) and Bare(x) -> Concluding(x))\nforall x (Conjunct(x) and Bare(x) -> Umpteenth(x))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) and Umpteenth(x) -> Concluding(x))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Broke(x))\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Conjunct(x))\nStupefied(rena) and Bare(rena) -> Concluding(rena)\n\nnot Broke(courtenay)\n\nBare(courtenay) and forall x (Bare(x) -> Broke(x)) -> therefore Broke(courtenay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Byram is leaky. Delia is propulsive. All leaky people are acheronian. Red, leaky people are acheronian. All acheronian, leaky people are briary. Rough, leaky people are asserted. All theatrical, asserted people are briary. Kind people are acheronian. All acheronian people are propulsive. If Delia is theatrical and Delia is leaky then Delia is briary. Byram is briary.", "logic": "\nLeaky(byram)\nPropulsive(delia)\nforall x (Leaky(x) -> Acheronian(x))\nforall x (Asserted(x) and Leaky(x) -> Acheronian(x))\nforall x (Acheronian(x) and Leaky(x) -> Briary(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) and Leaky(x) -> Asserted(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) and Asserted(x) -> Briary(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) -> Acheronian(x))\nforall x (Acheronian(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nTheatrical(delia) and Leaky(delia) -> Briary(delia)\n\nBriary(byram)\n\nLeaky(byram) and forall x (Leaky(x) -> Acheronian(x)) -> therefore Acheronian(byram) Acheronian(byram) and Leaky(byram) and forall x (Acheronian(x) and Leaky(x) -> Briary(x)) -> therefore Briary(byram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Gabriela is uniate. Clair is shed. All uniate people are allotted. Red, uniate people are allotted. All allotted, uniate people are northbound. Rough, uniate people are cured. All unabused, cured people are northbound. Kind people are allotted. All allotted people are shed. If Clair is unabused and Clair is uniate then Clair is northbound. Gabriela is not northbound.", "logic": "\nUniate(gabriela)\nShed(clair)\nforall x (Uniate(x) -> Allotted(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) and Uniate(x) -> Allotted(x))\nforall x (Allotted(x) and Uniate(x) -> Northbound(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) and Uniate(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and Cured(x) -> Northbound(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) -> Allotted(x))\nforall x (Allotted(x) -> Shed(x))\nUnabused(clair) and Uniate(clair) -> Northbound(clair)\n\nnot Northbound(gabriela)\n\nUniate(gabriela) and forall x (Uniate(x) -> Allotted(x)) -> therefore Allotted(gabriela) Allotted(gabriela) and Uniate(gabriela) and forall x (Allotted(x) and Uniate(x) -> Northbound(x)) -> therefore Northbound(gabriela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Koren is tunisian. Valma is wireless. All tunisian people are uneventful. Red, tunisian people are uneventful. All uneventful, tunisian people are unfixed. Rough, tunisian people are mesmeric. All sleeping, mesmeric people are unfixed. Kind people are uneventful. All uneventful people are wireless. If Valma is sleeping and Valma is tunisian then Valma is unfixed. Valma is not uneventful.", "logic": "\nTunisian(koren)\nWireless(valma)\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) and Tunisian(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Uneventful(x) and Tunisian(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Wireless(x) and Tunisian(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Uneventful(x) -> Wireless(x))\nSleeping(valma) and Tunisian(valma) -> Unfixed(valma)\n\nnot Uneventful(valma)\n\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> Uneventful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Forrest is haughty. Kaitlyn is overlooked. All haughty people are alcoholic. Red, haughty people are alcoholic. All alcoholic, haughty people are swelled. Rough, haughty people are initiatory. All covariant, initiatory people are swelled. Kind people are alcoholic. All alcoholic people are overlooked. If Kaitlyn is covariant and Kaitlyn is haughty then Kaitlyn is swelled. Kaitlyn is swelled.", "logic": "\nHaughty(forrest)\nOverlooked(kaitlyn)\nforall x (Haughty(x) -> Alcoholic(x))\nforall x (Initiatory(x) and Haughty(x) -> Alcoholic(x))\nforall x (Alcoholic(x) and Haughty(x) -> Swelled(x))\nforall x (Overlooked(x) and Haughty(x) -> Initiatory(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Initiatory(x) -> Swelled(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) -> Alcoholic(x))\nforall x (Alcoholic(x) -> Overlooked(x))\nCovariant(kaitlyn) and Haughty(kaitlyn) -> Swelled(kaitlyn)\n\nSwelled(kaitlyn)\n\nforall x (Alcoholic(x) and Haughty(x) -> Swelled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Eloisa is cliquish. Sturgis is fragmental. All cliquish people are dreaded. Red, cliquish people are dreaded. All dreaded, cliquish people are misused. Rough, cliquish people are unanimated. All rosy, unanimated people are misused. Kind people are dreaded. All dreaded people are fragmental. If Sturgis is rosy and Sturgis is cliquish then Sturgis is misused. Sturgis is not unanimated.", "logic": "\nCliquish(eloisa)\nFragmental(sturgis)\nforall x (Cliquish(x) -> Dreaded(x))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and Cliquish(x) -> Dreaded(x))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) and Cliquish(x) -> Misused(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and Cliquish(x) -> Unanimated(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) and Unanimated(x) -> Misused(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) -> Dreaded(x))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nRosy(sturgis) and Cliquish(sturgis) -> Misused(sturgis)\n\nnot Unanimated(sturgis)\n\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and Cliquish(x) -> Unanimated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Trude is pronounced. Irma is winsome. All pronounced people are ceremonial. Red, pronounced people are ceremonial. All ceremonial, pronounced people are bolshevik. Rough, pronounced people are panoplied. All unwelcome, panoplied people are bolshevik. Kind people are ceremonial. All ceremonial people are winsome. If Irma is unwelcome and Irma is pronounced then Irma is bolshevik. Trude is green.", "logic": "\nPronounced(trude)\nWinsome(irma)\nforall x (Pronounced(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and Pronounced(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) and Pronounced(x) -> Bolshevik(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Pronounced(x) -> Panoplied(x))\nforall x (Unwelcome(x) and Panoplied(x) -> Bolshevik(x))\nforall x (Unwelcome(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Winsome(x))\nUnwelcome(irma) and Pronounced(irma) -> Bolshevik(irma)\n\nGreen(trude)\n\nGreen(trude) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Mitch is unrealised. Gilli is regressive. All unrealised people are varying. Red, unrealised people are varying. All varying, unrealised people are cernuous. Rough, unrealised people are bronzed. All included, bronzed people are cernuous. Kind people are varying. All varying people are regressive. If Gilli is included and Gilli is unrealised then Gilli is cernuous. Mitch is not included.", "logic": "\nUnrealised(mitch)\nRegressive(gilli)\nforall x (Unrealised(x) -> Varying(x))\nforall x (Bronzed(x) and Unrealised(x) -> Varying(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) and Unrealised(x) -> Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Regressive(x) and Unrealised(x) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Included(x) and Bronzed(x) -> Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Included(x) -> Varying(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) -> Regressive(x))\nIncluded(gilli) and Unrealised(gilli) -> Cernuous(gilli)\n\nnot Included(mitch)\n\nnot Included(mitch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Elinore is thyroid. Nalani is english. All thyroid people are corrected. Red, thyroid people are corrected. All corrected, thyroid people are stative. Rough, thyroid people are antitank. All damaged, antitank people are stative. Kind people are corrected. All corrected people are english. If Nalani is damaged and Nalani is thyroid then Nalani is stative. Nalani is damaged.", "logic": "\nThyroid(elinore)\nEnglish(nalani)\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Antitank(x) and Thyroid(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Corrected(x) and Thyroid(x) -> Stative(x))\nforall x (English(x) and Thyroid(x) -> Antitank(x))\nforall x (Damaged(x) and Antitank(x) -> Stative(x))\nforall x (Damaged(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Corrected(x) -> English(x))\nDamaged(nalani) and Thyroid(nalani) -> Stative(nalani)\n\nDamaged(nalani)\n\nDamaged(nalani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2237"} {"premises": "Vasily is swayback. If Vasily is acidulous then Vasily is not especial. If someone is cuspidal then they are rural. If someone is acidulous and swayback then they are rural. If Vasily is swayback then Vasily is acidulous. All acidulous people are swayback. If someone is shivery then they are swayback. Vasily is swayback.", "logic": "\nSwayback(vasily)\nAcidulous(vasily) -> not Especial(vasily)\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Acidulous(x) and Swayback(x) -> Rural(x))\nSwayback(vasily) -> Acidulous(vasily)\nforall x (Acidulous(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Shivery(x) -> Swayback(x))\n\nSwayback(vasily)\n\ntherefore Swayback(vasily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "Brigida is here. If Brigida is remittent then Brigida is not unsigned. If someone is burnt then they are unwoven. If someone is remittent and here then they are unwoven. If Brigida is here then Brigida is remittent. All remittent people are here. If someone is casual then they are here. Brigida is not here.", "logic": "\nHere(brigida)\nRemittent(brigida) -> not Unsigned(brigida)\nforall x (Burnt(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nforall x (Remittent(x) and Here(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nHere(brigida) -> Remittent(brigida)\nforall x (Remittent(x) -> Here(x))\nforall x (Casual(x) -> Here(x))\n\nnot Here(brigida)\n\ntherefore Here(brigida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "Kellyann is hushed. If Kellyann is dubitable then Kellyann is not conjoined. If someone is livelong then they are expansible. If someone is dubitable and hushed then they are expansible. If Kellyann is hushed then Kellyann is dubitable. All dubitable people are hushed. If someone is duplex then they are hushed. Kellyann is dubitable.", "logic": "\nHushed(kellyann)\nDubitable(kellyann) -> not Conjoined(kellyann)\nforall x (Livelong(x) -> Expansible(x))\nforall x (Dubitable(x) and Hushed(x) -> Expansible(x))\nHushed(kellyann) -> Dubitable(kellyann)\nforall x (Dubitable(x) -> Hushed(x))\nforall x (Duplex(x) -> Hushed(x))\n\nDubitable(kellyann)\n\nHushed(kellyann) and Hushed(kellyann) -> Dubitable(kellyann) -> therefore Dubitable(kellyann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "Prasad is unsolvable. If Prasad is dispensed then Prasad is not endermic. If someone is fernless then they are shopsoiled. If someone is dispensed and unsolvable then they are shopsoiled. If Prasad is unsolvable then Prasad is dispensed. All dispensed people are unsolvable. If someone is canonist then they are unsolvable. Prasad is not dispensed.", "logic": "\nUnsolvable(prasad)\nDispensed(prasad) -> not Endermic(prasad)\nforall x (Fernless(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Dispensed(x) and Unsolvable(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nUnsolvable(prasad) -> Dispensed(prasad)\nforall x (Dispensed(x) -> Unsolvable(x))\nforall x (Canonist(x) -> Unsolvable(x))\n\nnot Dispensed(prasad)\n\nUnsolvable(prasad) and Unsolvable(prasad) -> Dispensed(prasad) -> therefore Dispensed(prasad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "Kellia is ninety. If Kellia is stupendous then Kellia is not mouldy. If someone is marketable then they are overlarge. If someone is stupendous and ninety then they are overlarge. If Kellia is ninety then Kellia is stupendous. All stupendous people are ninety. If someone is mired then they are ninety. Kellia is not mouldy.", "logic": "\nNinety(kellia)\nStupendous(kellia) -> not Mouldy(kellia)\nforall x (Marketable(x) -> Overlarge(x))\nforall x (Stupendous(x) and Ninety(x) -> Overlarge(x))\nNinety(kellia) -> Stupendous(kellia)\nforall x (Stupendous(x) -> Ninety(x))\nforall x (Mired(x) -> Ninety(x))\n\nnot Mouldy(kellia)\n\nNinety(kellia) and Ninety(kellia) -> Stupendous(kellia) -> therefore Stupendous(kellia) Stupendous(kellia) and Stupendous(kellia) -> not Mouldy(kellia) -> therefore not Mouldy(kellia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "Joaquin is raspy. If Joaquin is swedish then Joaquin is not garmented. If someone is eparchial then they are billionth. If someone is swedish and raspy then they are billionth. If Joaquin is raspy then Joaquin is swedish. All swedish people are raspy. If someone is rubbishy then they are raspy. Joaquin is not billionth.", "logic": "\nRaspy(joaquin)\nSwedish(joaquin) -> not Garmented(joaquin)\nforall x (Eparchial(x) -> Billionth(x))\nforall x (Swedish(x) and Raspy(x) -> Billionth(x))\nRaspy(joaquin) -> Swedish(joaquin)\nforall x (Swedish(x) -> Raspy(x))\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) -> Raspy(x))\n\nnot Billionth(joaquin)\n\nRaspy(joaquin) and Raspy(joaquin) -> Swedish(joaquin) -> therefore Swedish(joaquin) Swedish(joaquin) and Raspy(joaquin) and forall x (Swedish(x) and Raspy(x) -> Billionth(x)) -> therefore Billionth(joaquin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "Rheba is aneroid. If Rheba is acaudal then Rheba is not tepid. If someone is rewardful then they are viennese. If someone is acaudal and aneroid then they are viennese. If Rheba is aneroid then Rheba is acaudal. All acaudal people are aneroid. If someone is genteel then they are aneroid. Rheba is not round.", "logic": "\nAneroid(rheba)\nAcaudal(rheba) -> not Tepid(rheba)\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Viennese(x))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) and Aneroid(x) -> Viennese(x))\nAneroid(rheba) -> Acaudal(rheba)\nforall x (Acaudal(x) -> Aneroid(x))\nforall x (Genteel(x) -> Aneroid(x))\n\nnot Round(rheba)\n\nnot Round(rheba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "Fraser is indurate. If Fraser is casual then Fraser is not scaley. If someone is baffled then they are digitate. If someone is casual and indurate then they are digitate. If Fraser is indurate then Fraser is casual. All casual people are indurate. If someone is behavioral then they are indurate. Fraser is baffled.", "logic": "\nIndurate(fraser)\nCasual(fraser) -> not Scaley(fraser)\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Digitate(x))\nforall x (Casual(x) and Indurate(x) -> Digitate(x))\nIndurate(fraser) -> Casual(fraser)\nforall x (Casual(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Behavioral(x) -> Indurate(x))\n\nBaffled(fraser)\n\nBaffled(fraser) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-717"} {"premises": "The cobby is wired. The cobby novelize the nels. The cobby opalesce the aline. The cobby opalesce the nels. The aline is advective. The aline novelize the nels. The aline opalesce the nels. The nels is summative. The nels novelize the cobby. The nels opalesce the aline. If something freshen the cobby and it is dietary then it opalesce the aline. If the aline opalesce the cobby then the cobby novelize the nels. If the aline freshen the nels and the aline is summative then the aline opalesce the nels. If something novelize the aline and the aline freshen the cobby then the cobby freshen the nels. If something opalesce the aline and it opalesce the nels then the nels is dietary. If something is dietary then it opalesce the cobby. The cobby novelize the nels.", "logic": "\nWired(cobby)\nNovelize(cobby, nels)\nOpalesce(cobby, aline)\nOpalesce(cobby, nels)\nAdvective(aline)\nNovelize(aline, nels)\nOpalesce(aline, nels)\nSummative(nels)\nNovelize(nels, cobby)\nOpalesce(nels, aline)\nforall x (Freshen(x, cobby) and Dietary(x) -> Opalesce(x, aline))\nOpalesce(aline, cobby) -> Novelize(cobby, nels)\nFreshen(aline, nels) and Summative(aline) -> Opalesce(aline, nels)\nforall x (Novelize(x, aline) and Freshen(aline, cobby) -> Freshen(cobby, nels))\nforall x (Opalesce(x, aline) and Opalesce(x, nels) -> Dietary(nels))\nforall x (Dietary(x) -> Opalesce(x, cobby))\n\nNovelize(cobby, nels)\n\ntherefore Novelize(cobby, nels)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The elvera is bivariate. The elvera privilege the barb. The elvera autotomise the coleman. The elvera autotomise the barb. The coleman is dying. The coleman privilege the barb. The coleman autotomise the barb. The barb is narrative. The barb privilege the elvera. The barb autotomise the coleman. If something chair the elvera and it is papal then it autotomise the coleman. If the coleman autotomise the elvera then the elvera privilege the barb. If the coleman chair the barb and the coleman is narrative then the coleman autotomise the barb. If something privilege the coleman and the coleman chair the elvera then the elvera chair the barb. If something autotomise the coleman and it autotomise the barb then the barb is papal. If something is papal then it autotomise the elvera. The elvera is not bivariate.", "logic": "\nBivariate(elvera)\nPrivilege(elvera, barb)\nAutotomise(elvera, coleman)\nAutotomise(elvera, barb)\nDying(coleman)\nPrivilege(coleman, barb)\nAutotomise(coleman, barb)\nNarrative(barb)\nPrivilege(barb, elvera)\nAutotomise(barb, coleman)\nforall x (Chair(x, elvera) and Papal(x) -> Autotomise(x, coleman))\nAutotomise(coleman, elvera) -> Privilege(elvera, barb)\nChair(coleman, barb) and Narrative(coleman) -> Autotomise(coleman, barb)\nforall x (Privilege(x, coleman) and Chair(coleman, elvera) -> Chair(elvera, barb))\nforall x (Autotomise(x, coleman) and Autotomise(x, barb) -> Papal(barb))\nforall x (Papal(x) -> Autotomise(x, elvera))\n\nnot Bivariate(elvera)\n\ntherefore Bivariate(elvera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The crystie is shaping. The crystie economise the odell. The crystie lighter the vladimir. The crystie lighter the odell. The vladimir is unoriented. The vladimir economise the odell. The vladimir lighter the odell. The odell is vernal. The odell economise the crystie. The odell lighter the vladimir. If something whipsaw the crystie and it is creedal then it lighter the vladimir. If the vladimir lighter the crystie then the crystie economise the odell. If the vladimir whipsaw the odell and the vladimir is vernal then the vladimir lighter the odell. If something economise the vladimir and the vladimir whipsaw the crystie then the crystie whipsaw the odell. If something lighter the vladimir and it lighter the odell then the odell is creedal. If something is creedal then it lighter the crystie. The odell is creedal.", "logic": "\nShaping(crystie)\nEconomise(crystie, odell)\nLighter(crystie, vladimir)\nLighter(crystie, odell)\nUnoriented(vladimir)\nEconomise(vladimir, odell)\nLighter(vladimir, odell)\nVernal(odell)\nEconomise(odell, crystie)\nLighter(odell, vladimir)\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, crystie) and Creedal(x) -> Lighter(x, vladimir))\nLighter(vladimir, crystie) -> Economise(crystie, odell)\nWhipsaw(vladimir, odell) and Vernal(vladimir) -> Lighter(vladimir, odell)\nforall x (Economise(x, vladimir) and Whipsaw(vladimir, crystie) -> Whipsaw(crystie, odell))\nforall x (Lighter(x, vladimir) and Lighter(x, odell) -> Creedal(odell))\nforall x (Creedal(x) -> Lighter(x, crystie))\n\nCreedal(odell)\n\nLighter(crystie, vladimir) and Lighter(crystie, odell) and forall x (Lighter(x, vladimir) and Lighter(x, odell) -> Creedal(odell)) -> therefore Creedal(odell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The walter is unrhymed. The walter aliment the emylee. The walter forego the marsha. The walter forego the emylee. The marsha is eudaemonic. The marsha aliment the emylee. The marsha forego the emylee. The emylee is standpat. The emylee aliment the walter. The emylee forego the marsha. If something bandage the walter and it is xxiv then it forego the marsha. If the marsha forego the walter then the walter aliment the emylee. If the marsha bandage the emylee and the marsha is standpat then the marsha forego the emylee. If something aliment the marsha and the marsha bandage the walter then the walter bandage the emylee. If something forego the marsha and it forego the emylee then the emylee is xxiv. If something is xxiv then it forego the walter. The emylee is not xxiv.", "logic": "\nUnrhymed(walter)\nAliment(walter, emylee)\nForego(walter, marsha)\nForego(walter, emylee)\nEudaemonic(marsha)\nAliment(marsha, emylee)\nForego(marsha, emylee)\nStandpat(emylee)\nAliment(emylee, walter)\nForego(emylee, marsha)\nforall x (Bandage(x, walter) and Xxiv(x) -> Forego(x, marsha))\nForego(marsha, walter) -> Aliment(walter, emylee)\nBandage(marsha, emylee) and Standpat(marsha) -> Forego(marsha, emylee)\nforall x (Aliment(x, marsha) and Bandage(marsha, walter) -> Bandage(walter, emylee))\nforall x (Forego(x, marsha) and Forego(x, emylee) -> Xxiv(emylee))\nforall x (Xxiv(x) -> Forego(x, walter))\n\nnot Xxiv(emylee)\n\nForego(walter, marsha) and Forego(walter, emylee) and forall x (Forego(x, marsha) and Forego(x, emylee) -> Xxiv(emylee)) -> therefore Xxiv(emylee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The avis is suburban. The avis utilise the shari. The avis bewilder the nerti. The avis bewilder the shari. The nerti is awkward. The nerti utilise the shari. The nerti bewilder the shari. The shari is northeast. The shari utilise the avis. The shari bewilder the nerti. If something provoke the avis and it is unreported then it bewilder the nerti. If the nerti bewilder the avis then the avis utilise the shari. If the nerti provoke the shari and the nerti is northeast then the nerti bewilder the shari. If something utilise the nerti and the nerti provoke the avis then the avis provoke the shari. If something bewilder the nerti and it bewilder the shari then the shari is unreported. If something is unreported then it bewilder the avis. The shari bewilder the avis.", "logic": "\nSuburban(avis)\nUtilise(avis, shari)\nBewilder(avis, nerti)\nBewilder(avis, shari)\nAwkward(nerti)\nUtilise(nerti, shari)\nBewilder(nerti, shari)\nNortheast(shari)\nUtilise(shari, avis)\nBewilder(shari, nerti)\nforall x (Provoke(x, avis) and Unreported(x) -> Bewilder(x, nerti))\nBewilder(nerti, avis) -> Utilise(avis, shari)\nProvoke(nerti, shari) and Northeast(nerti) -> Bewilder(nerti, shari)\nforall x (Utilise(x, nerti) and Provoke(nerti, avis) -> Provoke(avis, shari))\nforall x (Bewilder(x, nerti) and Bewilder(x, shari) -> Unreported(shari))\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Bewilder(x, avis))\n\nBewilder(shari, avis)\n\nBewilder(avis, nerti) and Bewilder(avis, shari) and forall x (Bewilder(x, nerti) and Bewilder(x, shari) -> Unreported(shari)) -> therefore Unreported(shari) Unreported(shari) and forall x (Unreported(x) -> Bewilder(x, avis)) -> therefore Bewilder(shari, avis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The connie is antic. The connie arborise the sacha. The connie sermonize the tarra. The connie sermonize the sacha. The tarra is mauritian. The tarra arborise the sacha. The tarra sermonize the sacha. The sacha is liked. The sacha arborise the connie. The sacha sermonize the tarra. If something flick the connie and it is excited then it sermonize the tarra. If the tarra sermonize the connie then the connie arborise the sacha. If the tarra flick the sacha and the tarra is liked then the tarra sermonize the sacha. If something arborise the tarra and the tarra flick the connie then the connie flick the sacha. If something sermonize the tarra and it sermonize the sacha then the sacha is excited. If something is excited then it sermonize the connie. The sacha does not see the connie.", "logic": "\nAntic(connie)\nArborise(connie, sacha)\nSermonize(connie, tarra)\nSermonize(connie, sacha)\nMauritian(tarra)\nArborise(tarra, sacha)\nSermonize(tarra, sacha)\nLiked(sacha)\nArborise(sacha, connie)\nSermonize(sacha, tarra)\nforall x (Flick(x, connie) and Excited(x) -> Sermonize(x, tarra))\nSermonize(tarra, connie) -> Arborise(connie, sacha)\nFlick(tarra, sacha) and Liked(tarra) -> Sermonize(tarra, sacha)\nforall x (Arborise(x, tarra) and Flick(tarra, connie) -> Flick(connie, sacha))\nforall x (Sermonize(x, tarra) and Sermonize(x, sacha) -> Excited(sacha))\nforall x (Excited(x) -> Sermonize(x, connie))\n\nnot Sermonize(sacha, connie)\n\nSermonize(connie, tarra) and Sermonize(connie, sacha) and forall x (Sermonize(x, tarra) and Sermonize(x, sacha) -> Excited(sacha)) -> therefore Excited(sacha) Excited(sacha) and forall x (Excited(x) -> Sermonize(x, connie)) -> therefore Sermonize(sacha, connie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The lawson is laotian. The lawson browse the faustina. The lawson reave the xylina. The lawson reave the faustina. The xylina is catabatic. The xylina browse the faustina. The xylina reave the faustina. The faustina is lesser. The faustina browse the lawson. The faustina reave the xylina. If something encode the lawson and it is made then it reave the xylina. If the xylina reave the lawson then the lawson browse the faustina. If the xylina encode the faustina and the xylina is lesser then the xylina reave the faustina. If something browse the xylina and the xylina encode the lawson then the lawson encode the faustina. If something reave the xylina and it reave the faustina then the faustina is made. If something is made then it reave the lawson. The xylina does not see the lawson.", "logic": "\nLaotian(lawson)\nBrowse(lawson, faustina)\nReave(lawson, xylina)\nReave(lawson, faustina)\nCatabatic(xylina)\nBrowse(xylina, faustina)\nReave(xylina, faustina)\nLesser(faustina)\nBrowse(faustina, lawson)\nReave(faustina, xylina)\nforall x (Encode(x, lawson) and Made(x) -> Reave(x, xylina))\nReave(xylina, lawson) -> Browse(lawson, faustina)\nEncode(xylina, faustina) and Lesser(xylina) -> Reave(xylina, faustina)\nforall x (Browse(x, xylina) and Encode(xylina, lawson) -> Encode(lawson, faustina))\nforall x (Reave(x, xylina) and Reave(x, faustina) -> Made(faustina))\nforall x (Made(x) -> Reave(x, lawson))\n\nnot Reave(xylina, lawson)\n\nforall x (Made(x) -> Reave(x, lawson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The elmore is unedifying. The elmore marry the mariel. The elmore bloat the georg. The elmore bloat the mariel. The georg is cloistral. The georg marry the mariel. The georg bloat the mariel. The mariel is kenyan. The mariel marry the elmore. The mariel bloat the georg. If something misinform the elmore and it is abroad then it bloat the georg. If the georg bloat the elmore then the elmore marry the mariel. If the georg misinform the mariel and the georg is kenyan then the georg bloat the mariel. If something marry the georg and the georg misinform the elmore then the elmore misinform the mariel. If something bloat the georg and it bloat the mariel then the mariel is abroad. If something is abroad then it bloat the elmore. The georg bloat the georg.", "logic": "\nUnedifying(elmore)\nMarry(elmore, mariel)\nBloat(elmore, georg)\nBloat(elmore, mariel)\nCloistral(georg)\nMarry(georg, mariel)\nBloat(georg, mariel)\nKenyan(mariel)\nMarry(mariel, elmore)\nBloat(mariel, georg)\nforall x (Misinform(x, elmore) and Abroad(x) -> Bloat(x, georg))\nBloat(georg, elmore) -> Marry(elmore, mariel)\nMisinform(georg, mariel) and Kenyan(georg) -> Bloat(georg, mariel)\nforall x (Marry(x, georg) and Misinform(georg, elmore) -> Misinform(elmore, mariel))\nforall x (Bloat(x, georg) and Bloat(x, mariel) -> Abroad(mariel))\nforall x (Abroad(x) -> Bloat(x, elmore))\n\nBloat(georg, georg)\n\nforall x (Misinform(x, elmore) and Abroad(x) -> Bloat(x, georg)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The abra is abient. The abra wring the garey. The abra suppurate the averil. The abra suppurate the garey. The averil is symbolical. The averil wring the garey. The averil suppurate the garey. The garey is squashy. The garey wring the abra. The garey suppurate the averil. If something leather the abra and it is filmy then it suppurate the averil. If the averil suppurate the abra then the abra wring the garey. If the averil leather the garey and the averil is squashy then the averil suppurate the garey. If something wring the averil and the averil leather the abra then the abra leather the garey. If something suppurate the averil and it suppurate the garey then the garey is filmy. If something is filmy then it suppurate the abra. The abra does not see the abra.", "logic": "\nAbient(abra)\nWring(abra, garey)\nSuppurate(abra, averil)\nSuppurate(abra, garey)\nSymbolical(averil)\nWring(averil, garey)\nSuppurate(averil, garey)\nSquashy(garey)\nWring(garey, abra)\nSuppurate(garey, averil)\nforall x (Leather(x, abra) and Filmy(x) -> Suppurate(x, averil))\nSuppurate(averil, abra) -> Wring(abra, garey)\nLeather(averil, garey) and Squashy(averil) -> Suppurate(averil, garey)\nforall x (Wring(x, averil) and Leather(averil, abra) -> Leather(abra, garey))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, averil) and Suppurate(x, garey) -> Filmy(garey))\nforall x (Filmy(x) -> Suppurate(x, abra))\n\nnot Suppurate(abra, abra)\n\nforall x (Filmy(x) -> Suppurate(x, abra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The socrates is articulate. The socrates applaud the jaclin. The socrates desalinize the carmelita. The socrates desalinize the jaclin. The carmelita is hardy. The carmelita applaud the jaclin. The carmelita desalinize the jaclin. The jaclin is oleaceous. The jaclin applaud the socrates. The jaclin desalinize the carmelita. If something straw the socrates and it is improper then it desalinize the carmelita. If the carmelita desalinize the socrates then the socrates applaud the jaclin. If the carmelita straw the jaclin and the carmelita is oleaceous then the carmelita desalinize the jaclin. If something applaud the carmelita and the carmelita straw the socrates then the socrates straw the jaclin. If something desalinize the carmelita and it desalinize the jaclin then the jaclin is improper. If something is improper then it desalinize the socrates. The carmelita straw the jaclin.", "logic": "\nArticulate(socrates)\nApplaud(socrates, jaclin)\nDesalinize(socrates, carmelita)\nDesalinize(socrates, jaclin)\nHardy(carmelita)\nApplaud(carmelita, jaclin)\nDesalinize(carmelita, jaclin)\nOleaceous(jaclin)\nApplaud(jaclin, socrates)\nDesalinize(jaclin, carmelita)\nforall x (Straw(x, socrates) and Improper(x) -> Desalinize(x, carmelita))\nDesalinize(carmelita, socrates) -> Applaud(socrates, jaclin)\nStraw(carmelita, jaclin) and Oleaceous(carmelita) -> Desalinize(carmelita, jaclin)\nforall x (Applaud(x, carmelita) and Straw(carmelita, socrates) -> Straw(socrates, jaclin))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, carmelita) and Desalinize(x, jaclin) -> Improper(jaclin))\nforall x (Improper(x) -> Desalinize(x, socrates))\n\nStraw(carmelita, jaclin)\n\nStraw(carmelita, jaclin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The opaline is pledged. The opaline wince the betta. The opaline stone the mollie. The opaline stone the betta. The mollie is revenant. The mollie wince the betta. The mollie stone the betta. The betta is dystopian. The betta wince the opaline. The betta stone the mollie. If something chunk the opaline and it is gross then it stone the mollie. If the mollie stone the opaline then the opaline wince the betta. If the mollie chunk the betta and the mollie is dystopian then the mollie stone the betta. If something wince the mollie and the mollie chunk the opaline then the opaline chunk the betta. If something stone the mollie and it stone the betta then the betta is gross. If something is gross then it stone the opaline. The betta does not need the mollie.", "logic": "\nPledged(opaline)\nWince(opaline, betta)\nStone(opaline, mollie)\nStone(opaline, betta)\nRevenant(mollie)\nWince(mollie, betta)\nStone(mollie, betta)\nDystopian(betta)\nWince(betta, opaline)\nStone(betta, mollie)\nforall x (Chunk(x, opaline) and Gross(x) -> Stone(x, mollie))\nStone(mollie, opaline) -> Wince(opaline, betta)\nChunk(mollie, betta) and Dystopian(mollie) -> Stone(mollie, betta)\nforall x (Wince(x, mollie) and Chunk(mollie, opaline) -> Chunk(opaline, betta))\nforall x (Stone(x, mollie) and Stone(x, betta) -> Gross(betta))\nforall x (Gross(x) -> Stone(x, opaline))\n\nnot Wince(betta, mollie)\n\nnot Wince(betta, mollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The donica is trembling. The donica disembroil the fergus. The donica unchurch the juliann. The donica unchurch the fergus. The juliann is uncurled. The juliann disembroil the fergus. The juliann unchurch the fergus. The fergus is genotypic. The fergus disembroil the donica. The fergus unchurch the juliann. If something yarn the donica and it is sevenfold then it unchurch the juliann. If the juliann unchurch the donica then the donica disembroil the fergus. If the juliann yarn the fergus and the juliann is genotypic then the juliann unchurch the fergus. If something disembroil the juliann and the juliann yarn the donica then the donica yarn the fergus. If something unchurch the juliann and it unchurch the fergus then the fergus is sevenfold. If something is sevenfold then it unchurch the donica. The juliann is kind.", "logic": "\nTrembling(donica)\nDisembroil(donica, fergus)\nUnchurch(donica, juliann)\nUnchurch(donica, fergus)\nUncurled(juliann)\nDisembroil(juliann, fergus)\nUnchurch(juliann, fergus)\nGenotypic(fergus)\nDisembroil(fergus, donica)\nUnchurch(fergus, juliann)\nforall x (Yarn(x, donica) and Sevenfold(x) -> Unchurch(x, juliann))\nUnchurch(juliann, donica) -> Disembroil(donica, fergus)\nYarn(juliann, fergus) and Genotypic(juliann) -> Unchurch(juliann, fergus)\nforall x (Disembroil(x, juliann) and Yarn(juliann, donica) -> Yarn(donica, fergus))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, juliann) and Unchurch(x, fergus) -> Sevenfold(fergus))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) -> Unchurch(x, donica))\n\nKind(juliann)\n\nKind(juliann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-72"} {"premises": "The cherianne is not virtuous. The cherianne is susurrous. The cherianne prompt the theodor. The cherianne lighten the theodora. The cherianne lighten the caressa. The theodor is virtuous. The theodor is anatropous. The theodor pompadour the theodora. The theodor lighten the theodora. The theodora is anatropous. The theodora lighten the theodor. The caressa is virtuous. The caressa is susurrous. The caressa pompadour the theodora. The caressa lighten the cherianne. The caressa lighten the theodor. If someone is counter and virtuous then they see the theodor. If someone lighten the cherianne and they need the cherianne then the cherianne is counter. If someone lighten the cherianne and the cherianne lighten the theodora then they like the theodor. If someone lighten the caressa and the caressa lighten the cherianne then they do not need the caressa. If someone pompadour the theodor then the theodor is susurrous. If someone pompadour the theodora and they do not need the caressa then the theodora pompadour the caressa. The theodora lighten the theodor.", "logic": "\nnot Virtuous(cherianne)\nSusurrous(cherianne)\nPrompt(cherianne, theodor)\nLighten(cherianne, theodora)\nLighten(cherianne, caressa)\nVirtuous(theodor)\nAnatropous(theodor)\nPompadour(theodor, theodora)\nLighten(theodor, theodora)\nAnatropous(theodora)\nLighten(theodora, theodor)\nVirtuous(caressa)\nSusurrous(caressa)\nPompadour(caressa, theodora)\nLighten(caressa, cherianne)\nLighten(caressa, theodor)\nforall x (Counter(x) and Virtuous(x) -> Lighten(x, theodor))\nforall x (Lighten(x, cherianne) and Prompt(x, cherianne) -> Counter(cherianne))\nforall x (Lighten(x, cherianne) and Lighten(cherianne, theodora) -> Pompadour(x, theodor))\nforall x (Lighten(x, caressa) and Lighten(caressa, cherianne) -> not Prompt(x, caressa))\nforall x (Pompadour(x, theodor) -> Susurrous(theodor))\nforall x (Pompadour(x, theodora) and not Prompt(x, caressa) -> Pompadour(theodora, caressa))\n\nLighten(theodora, theodor)\n\ntherefore Lighten(theodora, theodor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The lynea is not ponderous. The lynea is notional. The lynea spam the kaiser. The lynea enrage the chloris. The lynea enrage the ami. The kaiser is ponderous. The kaiser is populous. The kaiser spew the chloris. The kaiser enrage the chloris. The chloris is populous. The chloris enrage the kaiser. The ami is ponderous. The ami is notional. The ami spew the chloris. The ami enrage the lynea. The ami enrage the kaiser. If someone is maroon and ponderous then they see the kaiser. If someone enrage the lynea and they need the lynea then the lynea is maroon. If someone enrage the lynea and the lynea enrage the chloris then they like the kaiser. If someone enrage the ami and the ami enrage the lynea then they do not need the ami. If someone spew the kaiser then the kaiser is notional. If someone spew the chloris and they do not need the ami then the chloris spew the ami. The lynea is not notional.", "logic": "\nnot Ponderous(lynea)\nNotional(lynea)\nSpam(lynea, kaiser)\nEnrage(lynea, chloris)\nEnrage(lynea, ami)\nPonderous(kaiser)\nPopulous(kaiser)\nSpew(kaiser, chloris)\nEnrage(kaiser, chloris)\nPopulous(chloris)\nEnrage(chloris, kaiser)\nPonderous(ami)\nNotional(ami)\nSpew(ami, chloris)\nEnrage(ami, lynea)\nEnrage(ami, kaiser)\nforall x (Maroon(x) and Ponderous(x) -> Enrage(x, kaiser))\nforall x (Enrage(x, lynea) and Spam(x, lynea) -> Maroon(lynea))\nforall x (Enrage(x, lynea) and Enrage(lynea, chloris) -> Spew(x, kaiser))\nforall x (Enrage(x, ami) and Enrage(ami, lynea) -> not Spam(x, ami))\nforall x (Spew(x, kaiser) -> Notional(kaiser))\nforall x (Spew(x, chloris) and not Spam(x, ami) -> Spew(chloris, ami))\n\nnot Notional(lynea)\n\ntherefore Notional(lynea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The langston is not belgian. The langston is languid. The langston swaddle the lillian. The langston assuage the kevan. The langston assuage the locke. The lillian is belgian. The lillian is unplowed. The lillian blat the kevan. The lillian assuage the kevan. The kevan is unplowed. The kevan assuage the lillian. The locke is belgian. The locke is languid. The locke blat the kevan. The locke assuage the langston. The locke assuage the lillian. If someone is mercerised and belgian then they see the lillian. If someone assuage the langston and they need the langston then the langston is mercerised. If someone assuage the langston and the langston assuage the kevan then they like the lillian. If someone assuage the locke and the locke assuage the langston then they do not need the locke. If someone blat the lillian then the lillian is languid. If someone blat the kevan and they do not need the locke then the kevan blat the locke. The locke blat the lillian.", "logic": "\nnot Belgian(langston)\nLanguid(langston)\nSwaddle(langston, lillian)\nAssuage(langston, kevan)\nAssuage(langston, locke)\nBelgian(lillian)\nUnplowed(lillian)\nBlat(lillian, kevan)\nAssuage(lillian, kevan)\nUnplowed(kevan)\nAssuage(kevan, lillian)\nBelgian(locke)\nLanguid(locke)\nBlat(locke, kevan)\nAssuage(locke, langston)\nAssuage(locke, lillian)\nforall x (Mercerised(x) and Belgian(x) -> Assuage(x, lillian))\nforall x (Assuage(x, langston) and Swaddle(x, langston) -> Mercerised(langston))\nforall x (Assuage(x, langston) and Assuage(langston, kevan) -> Blat(x, lillian))\nforall x (Assuage(x, locke) and Assuage(locke, langston) -> not Swaddle(x, locke))\nforall x (Blat(x, lillian) -> Languid(lillian))\nforall x (Blat(x, kevan) and not Swaddle(x, locke) -> Blat(kevan, locke))\n\nBlat(locke, lillian)\n\nAssuage(locke, langston) and Assuage(langston, kevan) and forall x (Assuage(x, langston) and Assuage(langston, kevan) -> Blat(x, lillian)) -> therefore Blat(locke, lillian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The shelden is not acetous. The shelden is somalian. The shelden reassail the celle. The shelden abolish the chicky. The shelden abolish the ignace. The celle is acetous. The celle is fanned. The celle befuddle the chicky. The celle abolish the chicky. The chicky is fanned. The chicky abolish the celle. The ignace is acetous. The ignace is somalian. The ignace befuddle the chicky. The ignace abolish the shelden. The ignace abolish the celle. If someone is anabolic and acetous then they see the celle. If someone abolish the shelden and they need the shelden then the shelden is anabolic. If someone abolish the shelden and the shelden abolish the chicky then they like the celle. If someone abolish the ignace and the ignace abolish the shelden then they do not need the ignace. If someone befuddle the celle then the celle is somalian. If someone befuddle the chicky and they do not need the ignace then the chicky befuddle the ignace. The shelden reassail the ignace.", "logic": "\nnot Acetous(shelden)\nSomalian(shelden)\nReassail(shelden, celle)\nAbolish(shelden, chicky)\nAbolish(shelden, ignace)\nAcetous(celle)\nFanned(celle)\nBefuddle(celle, chicky)\nAbolish(celle, chicky)\nFanned(chicky)\nAbolish(chicky, celle)\nAcetous(ignace)\nSomalian(ignace)\nBefuddle(ignace, chicky)\nAbolish(ignace, shelden)\nAbolish(ignace, celle)\nforall x (Anabolic(x) and Acetous(x) -> Abolish(x, celle))\nforall x (Abolish(x, shelden) and Reassail(x, shelden) -> Anabolic(shelden))\nforall x (Abolish(x, shelden) and Abolish(shelden, chicky) -> Befuddle(x, celle))\nforall x (Abolish(x, ignace) and Abolish(ignace, shelden) -> not Reassail(x, ignace))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, celle) -> Somalian(celle))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, chicky) and not Reassail(x, ignace) -> Befuddle(chicky, ignace))\n\nReassail(shelden, ignace)\n\nAbolish(shelden, ignace) and Abolish(ignace, shelden) and forall x (Abolish(x, ignace) and Abolish(ignace, shelden) -> not Reassail(x, ignace)) -> therefore not Reassail(shelden, ignace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The mariya is not wizard. The mariya is carved. The mariya satisfy the adi. The mariya zone the kelwin. The mariya zone the eugenia. The adi is wizard. The adi is macerative. The adi stink the kelwin. The adi zone the kelwin. The kelwin is macerative. The kelwin zone the adi. The eugenia is wizard. The eugenia is carved. The eugenia stink the kelwin. The eugenia zone the mariya. The eugenia zone the adi. If someone is disjoint and wizard then they see the adi. If someone zone the mariya and they need the mariya then the mariya is disjoint. If someone zone the mariya and the mariya zone the kelwin then they like the adi. If someone zone the eugenia and the eugenia zone the mariya then they do not need the eugenia. If someone stink the adi then the adi is carved. If someone stink the kelwin and they do not need the eugenia then the kelwin stink the eugenia. The adi is carved.", "logic": "\nnot Wizard(mariya)\nCarved(mariya)\nSatisfy(mariya, adi)\nZone(mariya, kelwin)\nZone(mariya, eugenia)\nWizard(adi)\nMacerative(adi)\nStink(adi, kelwin)\nZone(adi, kelwin)\nMacerative(kelwin)\nZone(kelwin, adi)\nWizard(eugenia)\nCarved(eugenia)\nStink(eugenia, kelwin)\nZone(eugenia, mariya)\nZone(eugenia, adi)\nforall x (Disjoint(x) and Wizard(x) -> Zone(x, adi))\nforall x (Zone(x, mariya) and Satisfy(x, mariya) -> Disjoint(mariya))\nforall x (Zone(x, mariya) and Zone(mariya, kelwin) -> Stink(x, adi))\nforall x (Zone(x, eugenia) and Zone(eugenia, mariya) -> not Satisfy(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Stink(x, adi) -> Carved(adi))\nforall x (Stink(x, kelwin) and not Satisfy(x, eugenia) -> Stink(kelwin, eugenia))\n\nCarved(adi)\n\nZone(eugenia, mariya) and Zone(mariya, kelwin) and forall x (Zone(x, mariya) and Zone(mariya, kelwin) -> Stink(x, adi)) -> therefore Stink(eugenia, adi) Stink(eugenia, adi) and forall x (Stink(x, adi) -> Carved(adi)) -> therefore Carved(adi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The norina is not annual. The norina is lustreless. The norina gall the morganica. The norina bewray the jordain. The norina bewray the mathias. The morganica is annual. The morganica is aleuronic. The morganica abrogate the jordain. The morganica bewray the jordain. The jordain is aleuronic. The jordain bewray the morganica. The mathias is annual. The mathias is lustreless. The mathias abrogate the jordain. The mathias bewray the norina. The mathias bewray the morganica. If someone is overt and annual then they see the morganica. If someone bewray the norina and they need the norina then the norina is overt. If someone bewray the norina and the norina bewray the jordain then they like the morganica. If someone bewray the mathias and the mathias bewray the norina then they do not need the mathias. If someone abrogate the morganica then the morganica is lustreless. If someone abrogate the jordain and they do not need the mathias then the jordain abrogate the mathias. The morganica is not lustreless.", "logic": "\nnot Annual(norina)\nLustreless(norina)\nGall(norina, morganica)\nBewray(norina, jordain)\nBewray(norina, mathias)\nAnnual(morganica)\nAleuronic(morganica)\nAbrogate(morganica, jordain)\nBewray(morganica, jordain)\nAleuronic(jordain)\nBewray(jordain, morganica)\nAnnual(mathias)\nLustreless(mathias)\nAbrogate(mathias, jordain)\nBewray(mathias, norina)\nBewray(mathias, morganica)\nforall x (Overt(x) and Annual(x) -> Bewray(x, morganica))\nforall x (Bewray(x, norina) and Gall(x, norina) -> Overt(norina))\nforall x (Bewray(x, norina) and Bewray(norina, jordain) -> Abrogate(x, morganica))\nforall x (Bewray(x, mathias) and Bewray(mathias, norina) -> not Gall(x, mathias))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, morganica) -> Lustreless(morganica))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, jordain) and not Gall(x, mathias) -> Abrogate(jordain, mathias))\n\nnot Lustreless(morganica)\n\nBewray(mathias, norina) and Bewray(norina, jordain) and forall x (Bewray(x, norina) and Bewray(norina, jordain) -> Abrogate(x, morganica)) -> therefore Abrogate(mathias, morganica) Abrogate(mathias, morganica) and forall x (Abrogate(x, morganica) -> Lustreless(morganica)) -> therefore Lustreless(morganica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The abbey is not monumental. The abbey is triploid. The abbey bemire the denny. The abbey decease the tad. The abbey decease the margie. The denny is monumental. The denny is meningeal. The denny collapse the tad. The denny decease the tad. The tad is meningeal. The tad decease the denny. The margie is monumental. The margie is triploid. The margie collapse the tad. The margie decease the abbey. The margie decease the denny. If someone is bombproof and monumental then they see the denny. If someone decease the abbey and they need the abbey then the abbey is bombproof. If someone decease the abbey and the abbey decease the tad then they like the denny. If someone decease the margie and the margie decease the abbey then they do not need the margie. If someone collapse the denny then the denny is triploid. If someone collapse the tad and they do not need the margie then the tad collapse the margie. The tad does not like the denny.", "logic": "\nnot Monumental(abbey)\nTriploid(abbey)\nBemire(abbey, denny)\nDecease(abbey, tad)\nDecease(abbey, margie)\nMonumental(denny)\nMeningeal(denny)\nCollapse(denny, tad)\nDecease(denny, tad)\nMeningeal(tad)\nDecease(tad, denny)\nMonumental(margie)\nTriploid(margie)\nCollapse(margie, tad)\nDecease(margie, abbey)\nDecease(margie, denny)\nforall x (Bombproof(x) and Monumental(x) -> Decease(x, denny))\nforall x (Decease(x, abbey) and Bemire(x, abbey) -> Bombproof(abbey))\nforall x (Decease(x, abbey) and Decease(abbey, tad) -> Collapse(x, denny))\nforall x (Decease(x, margie) and Decease(margie, abbey) -> not Bemire(x, margie))\nforall x (Collapse(x, denny) -> Triploid(denny))\nforall x (Collapse(x, tad) and not Bemire(x, margie) -> Collapse(tad, margie))\n\nnot Collapse(tad, denny)\n\nforall x (Decease(x, abbey) and Decease(abbey, tad) -> Collapse(x, denny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The goober is not judicable. The goober is honeyed. The goober blitz the beulah. The goober oyster the elise. The goober oyster the thekla. The beulah is judicable. The beulah is unable. The beulah deaminate the elise. The beulah oyster the elise. The elise is unable. The elise oyster the beulah. The thekla is judicable. The thekla is honeyed. The thekla deaminate the elise. The thekla oyster the goober. The thekla oyster the beulah. If someone is drowsing and judicable then they see the beulah. If someone oyster the goober and they need the goober then the goober is drowsing. If someone oyster the goober and the goober oyster the elise then they like the beulah. If someone oyster the thekla and the thekla oyster the goober then they do not need the thekla. If someone deaminate the beulah then the beulah is honeyed. If someone deaminate the elise and they do not need the thekla then the elise deaminate the thekla. The goober is drowsing.", "logic": "\nnot Judicable(goober)\nHoneyed(goober)\nBlitz(goober, beulah)\nOyster(goober, elise)\nOyster(goober, thekla)\nJudicable(beulah)\nUnable(beulah)\nDeaminate(beulah, elise)\nOyster(beulah, elise)\nUnable(elise)\nOyster(elise, beulah)\nJudicable(thekla)\nHoneyed(thekla)\nDeaminate(thekla, elise)\nOyster(thekla, goober)\nOyster(thekla, beulah)\nforall x (Drowsing(x) and Judicable(x) -> Oyster(x, beulah))\nforall x (Oyster(x, goober) and Blitz(x, goober) -> Drowsing(goober))\nforall x (Oyster(x, goober) and Oyster(goober, elise) -> Deaminate(x, beulah))\nforall x (Oyster(x, thekla) and Oyster(thekla, goober) -> not Blitz(x, thekla))\nforall x (Deaminate(x, beulah) -> Honeyed(beulah))\nforall x (Deaminate(x, elise) and not Blitz(x, thekla) -> Deaminate(elise, thekla))\n\nDrowsing(goober)\n\nforall x (Oyster(x, goober) and Blitz(x, goober) -> Drowsing(goober)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The mabel is not joking. The mabel is diametral. The mabel bamboozle the dotty. The mabel privilege the rey. The mabel privilege the bruno. The dotty is joking. The dotty is pectoral. The dotty lull the rey. The dotty privilege the rey. The rey is pectoral. The rey privilege the dotty. The bruno is joking. The bruno is diametral. The bruno lull the rey. The bruno privilege the mabel. The bruno privilege the dotty. If someone is rampant and joking then they see the dotty. If someone privilege the mabel and they need the mabel then the mabel is rampant. If someone privilege the mabel and the mabel privilege the rey then they like the dotty. If someone privilege the bruno and the bruno privilege the mabel then they do not need the bruno. If someone lull the dotty then the dotty is diametral. If someone lull the rey and they do not need the bruno then the rey lull the bruno. The mabel does not see the dotty.", "logic": "\nnot Joking(mabel)\nDiametral(mabel)\nBamboozle(mabel, dotty)\nPrivilege(mabel, rey)\nPrivilege(mabel, bruno)\nJoking(dotty)\nPectoral(dotty)\nLull(dotty, rey)\nPrivilege(dotty, rey)\nPectoral(rey)\nPrivilege(rey, dotty)\nJoking(bruno)\nDiametral(bruno)\nLull(bruno, rey)\nPrivilege(bruno, mabel)\nPrivilege(bruno, dotty)\nforall x (Rampant(x) and Joking(x) -> Privilege(x, dotty))\nforall x (Privilege(x, mabel) and Bamboozle(x, mabel) -> Rampant(mabel))\nforall x (Privilege(x, mabel) and Privilege(mabel, rey) -> Lull(x, dotty))\nforall x (Privilege(x, bruno) and Privilege(bruno, mabel) -> not Bamboozle(x, bruno))\nforall x (Lull(x, dotty) -> Diametral(dotty))\nforall x (Lull(x, rey) and not Bamboozle(x, bruno) -> Lull(rey, bruno))\n\nnot Privilege(mabel, dotty)\n\nforall x (Rampant(x) and Joking(x) -> Privilege(x, dotty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The burke is not several. The burke is minuscule. The burke bitt the selie. The burke implant the nisse. The burke implant the kingsley. The selie is several. The selie is extraneous. The selie flatten the nisse. The selie implant the nisse. The nisse is extraneous. The nisse implant the selie. The kingsley is several. The kingsley is minuscule. The kingsley flatten the nisse. The kingsley implant the burke. The kingsley implant the selie. If someone is boughless and several then they see the selie. If someone implant the burke and they need the burke then the burke is boughless. If someone implant the burke and the burke implant the nisse then they like the selie. If someone implant the kingsley and the kingsley implant the burke then they do not need the kingsley. If someone flatten the selie then the selie is minuscule. If someone flatten the nisse and they do not need the kingsley then the nisse flatten the kingsley. The nisse flatten the burke.", "logic": "\nnot Several(burke)\nMinuscule(burke)\nBitt(burke, selie)\nImplant(burke, nisse)\nImplant(burke, kingsley)\nSeveral(selie)\nExtraneous(selie)\nFlatten(selie, nisse)\nImplant(selie, nisse)\nExtraneous(nisse)\nImplant(nisse, selie)\nSeveral(kingsley)\nMinuscule(kingsley)\nFlatten(kingsley, nisse)\nImplant(kingsley, burke)\nImplant(kingsley, selie)\nforall x (Boughless(x) and Several(x) -> Implant(x, selie))\nforall x (Implant(x, burke) and Bitt(x, burke) -> Boughless(burke))\nforall x (Implant(x, burke) and Implant(burke, nisse) -> Flatten(x, selie))\nforall x (Implant(x, kingsley) and Implant(kingsley, burke) -> not Bitt(x, kingsley))\nforall x (Flatten(x, selie) -> Minuscule(selie))\nforall x (Flatten(x, nisse) and not Bitt(x, kingsley) -> Flatten(nisse, kingsley))\n\nFlatten(nisse, burke)\n\nFlatten(nisse, burke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The herminia is not itinerant. The herminia is puerile. The herminia land the kurt. The herminia store the orly. The herminia store the noreen. The kurt is itinerant. The kurt is cypriote. The kurt incubate the orly. The kurt store the orly. The orly is cypriote. The orly store the kurt. The noreen is itinerant. The noreen is puerile. The noreen incubate the orly. The noreen store the herminia. The noreen store the kurt. If someone is inaugural and itinerant then they see the kurt. If someone store the herminia and they need the herminia then the herminia is inaugural. If someone store the herminia and the herminia store the orly then they like the kurt. If someone store the noreen and the noreen store the herminia then they do not need the noreen. If someone incubate the kurt then the kurt is puerile. If someone incubate the orly and they do not need the noreen then the orly incubate the noreen. The noreen is not nice.", "logic": "\nnot Itinerant(herminia)\nPuerile(herminia)\nLand(herminia, kurt)\nStore(herminia, orly)\nStore(herminia, noreen)\nItinerant(kurt)\nCypriote(kurt)\nIncubate(kurt, orly)\nStore(kurt, orly)\nCypriote(orly)\nStore(orly, kurt)\nItinerant(noreen)\nPuerile(noreen)\nIncubate(noreen, orly)\nStore(noreen, herminia)\nStore(noreen, kurt)\nforall x (Inaugural(x) and Itinerant(x) -> Store(x, kurt))\nforall x (Store(x, herminia) and Land(x, herminia) -> Inaugural(herminia))\nforall x (Store(x, herminia) and Store(herminia, orly) -> Incubate(x, kurt))\nforall x (Store(x, noreen) and Store(noreen, herminia) -> not Land(x, noreen))\nforall x (Incubate(x, kurt) -> Puerile(kurt))\nforall x (Incubate(x, orly) and not Land(x, noreen) -> Incubate(orly, noreen))\n\nnot Nice(noreen)\n\nnot Nice(noreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "The miles is not bastioned. The miles is algal. The miles inunct the joey. The miles disconcert the carmita. The miles disconcert the minny. The joey is bastioned. The joey is coexistent. The joey judge the carmita. The joey disconcert the carmita. The carmita is coexistent. The carmita disconcert the joey. The minny is bastioned. The minny is algal. The minny judge the carmita. The minny disconcert the miles. The minny disconcert the joey. If someone is beaten and bastioned then they see the joey. If someone disconcert the miles and they need the miles then the miles is beaten. If someone disconcert the miles and the miles disconcert the carmita then they like the joey. If someone disconcert the minny and the minny disconcert the miles then they do not need the minny. If someone judge the joey then the joey is algal. If someone judge the carmita and they do not need the minny then the carmita judge the minny. The joey inunct the carmita.", "logic": "\nnot Bastioned(miles)\nAlgal(miles)\nInunct(miles, joey)\nDisconcert(miles, carmita)\nDisconcert(miles, minny)\nBastioned(joey)\nCoexistent(joey)\nJudge(joey, carmita)\nDisconcert(joey, carmita)\nCoexistent(carmita)\nDisconcert(carmita, joey)\nBastioned(minny)\nAlgal(minny)\nJudge(minny, carmita)\nDisconcert(minny, miles)\nDisconcert(minny, joey)\nforall x (Beaten(x) and Bastioned(x) -> Disconcert(x, joey))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, miles) and Inunct(x, miles) -> Beaten(miles))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, miles) and Disconcert(miles, carmita) -> Judge(x, joey))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, minny) and Disconcert(minny, miles) -> not Inunct(x, minny))\nforall x (Judge(x, joey) -> Algal(joey))\nforall x (Judge(x, carmita) and not Inunct(x, minny) -> Judge(carmita, minny))\n\nInunct(joey, carmita)\n\nInunct(joey, carmita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1810"} {"premises": "Gardiner is nautical. Gardiner is dendroidal. Rae is evoked. If someone is damascene then they are nautical. Furry, acuminate people are ungrudging. If someone is evoked and nautical then they are acuminate. If someone is evoked then they are nautical. If Gardiner is damascene and Gardiner is dendroidal then Gardiner is nautical. If someone is damascene and deficient then they are nautical. Cold people are evoked. All ungrudging, acuminate people are deficient. Rae is evoked.", "logic": "\nNautical(gardiner)\nDendroidal(gardiner)\nEvoked(rae)\nforall x (Damascene(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and Acuminate(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\nforall x (Evoked(x) and Nautical(x) -> Acuminate(x))\nforall x (Evoked(x) -> Nautical(x))\nDamascene(gardiner) and Dendroidal(gardiner) -> Nautical(gardiner)\nforall x (Damascene(x) and Deficient(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Damascene(x) -> Evoked(x))\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) and Acuminate(x) -> Deficient(x))\n\nEvoked(rae)\n\ntherefore Evoked(rae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Marline is avestan. Marline is bristly. Tyler is gallant. If someone is radio then they are avestan. Furry, blurred people are callous. If someone is gallant and avestan then they are blurred. If someone is gallant then they are avestan. If Marline is radio and Marline is bristly then Marline is avestan. If someone is radio and mediate then they are avestan. Cold people are gallant. All callous, blurred people are mediate. Marline is not avestan.", "logic": "\nAvestan(marline)\nBristly(marline)\nGallant(tyler)\nforall x (Radio(x) -> Avestan(x))\nforall x (Avestan(x) and Blurred(x) -> Callous(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Avestan(x) -> Blurred(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) -> Avestan(x))\nRadio(marline) and Bristly(marline) -> Avestan(marline)\nforall x (Radio(x) and Mediate(x) -> Avestan(x))\nforall x (Radio(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Callous(x) and Blurred(x) -> Mediate(x))\n\nnot Avestan(marline)\n\ntherefore Avestan(marline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Aldwin is female. Aldwin is extant. Moina is rustling. If someone is flexile then they are female. Furry, treated people are glad. If someone is rustling and female then they are treated. If someone is rustling then they are female. If Aldwin is flexile and Aldwin is extant then Aldwin is female. If someone is flexile and spiteful then they are female. Cold people are rustling. All glad, treated people are spiteful. Moina is female.", "logic": "\nFemale(aldwin)\nExtant(aldwin)\nRustling(moina)\nforall x (Flexile(x) -> Female(x))\nforall x (Female(x) and Treated(x) -> Glad(x))\nforall x (Rustling(x) and Female(x) -> Treated(x))\nforall x (Rustling(x) -> Female(x))\nFlexile(aldwin) and Extant(aldwin) -> Female(aldwin)\nforall x (Flexile(x) and Spiteful(x) -> Female(x))\nforall x (Flexile(x) -> Rustling(x))\nforall x (Glad(x) and Treated(x) -> Spiteful(x))\n\nFemale(moina)\n\nRustling(moina) and forall x (Rustling(x) -> Female(x)) -> therefore Female(moina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Dulciana is alkalotic. Dulciana is surefooted. Derby is overweight. If someone is syllabic then they are alkalotic. Furry, rabbinic people are projecting. If someone is overweight and alkalotic then they are rabbinic. If someone is overweight then they are alkalotic. If Dulciana is syllabic and Dulciana is surefooted then Dulciana is alkalotic. If someone is syllabic and punitive then they are alkalotic. Cold people are overweight. All projecting, rabbinic people are punitive. Derby is not alkalotic.", "logic": "\nAlkalotic(dulciana)\nSurefooted(dulciana)\nOverweight(derby)\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> Alkalotic(x))\nforall x (Alkalotic(x) and Rabbinic(x) -> Projecting(x))\nforall x (Overweight(x) and Alkalotic(x) -> Rabbinic(x))\nforall x (Overweight(x) -> Alkalotic(x))\nSyllabic(dulciana) and Surefooted(dulciana) -> Alkalotic(dulciana)\nforall x (Syllabic(x) and Punitive(x) -> Alkalotic(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> Overweight(x))\nforall x (Projecting(x) and Rabbinic(x) -> Punitive(x))\n\nnot Alkalotic(derby)\n\nOverweight(derby) and forall x (Overweight(x) -> Alkalotic(x)) -> therefore Alkalotic(derby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Norah is threadlike. Norah is wholesale. Salomon is prayerful. If someone is witchlike then they are threadlike. Furry, alvine people are worldly. If someone is prayerful and threadlike then they are alvine. If someone is prayerful then they are threadlike. If Norah is witchlike and Norah is wholesale then Norah is threadlike. If someone is witchlike and valued then they are threadlike. Cold people are prayerful. All worldly, alvine people are valued. Salomon is alvine.", "logic": "\nThreadlike(norah)\nWholesale(norah)\nPrayerful(salomon)\nforall x (Witchlike(x) -> Threadlike(x))\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and Alvine(x) -> Worldly(x))\nforall x (Prayerful(x) and Threadlike(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Prayerful(x) -> Threadlike(x))\nWitchlike(norah) and Wholesale(norah) -> Threadlike(norah)\nforall x (Witchlike(x) and Valued(x) -> Threadlike(x))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Worldly(x) and Alvine(x) -> Valued(x))\n\nAlvine(salomon)\n\nPrayerful(salomon) and forall x (Prayerful(x) -> Threadlike(x)) -> therefore Threadlike(salomon) Prayerful(salomon) and Threadlike(salomon) and forall x (Prayerful(x) and Threadlike(x) -> Alvine(x)) -> therefore Alvine(salomon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Leah is thyroidal. Leah is silenced. Florida is current. If someone is void then they are thyroidal. Furry, albinal people are uninfected. If someone is current and thyroidal then they are albinal. If someone is current then they are thyroidal. If Leah is void and Leah is silenced then Leah is thyroidal. If someone is void and ragged then they are thyroidal. Cold people are current. All uninfected, albinal people are ragged. Florida is not albinal.", "logic": "\nThyroidal(leah)\nSilenced(leah)\nCurrent(florida)\nforall x (Void(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\nforall x (Thyroidal(x) and Albinal(x) -> Uninfected(x))\nforall x (Current(x) and Thyroidal(x) -> Albinal(x))\nforall x (Current(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\nVoid(leah) and Silenced(leah) -> Thyroidal(leah)\nforall x (Void(x) and Ragged(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\nforall x (Void(x) -> Current(x))\nforall x (Uninfected(x) and Albinal(x) -> Ragged(x))\n\nnot Albinal(florida)\n\nCurrent(florida) and forall x (Current(x) -> Thyroidal(x)) -> therefore Thyroidal(florida) Current(florida) and Thyroidal(florida) and forall x (Current(x) and Thyroidal(x) -> Albinal(x)) -> therefore Albinal(florida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Filbert is donnish. Filbert is hatted. Wildon is corking. If someone is captive then they are donnish. Furry, carbonic people are appalled. If someone is corking and donnish then they are carbonic. If someone is corking then they are donnish. If Filbert is captive and Filbert is hatted then Filbert is donnish. If someone is captive and unflavored then they are donnish. Cold people are corking. All appalled, carbonic people are unflavored. Filbert is not corking.", "logic": "\nDonnish(filbert)\nHatted(filbert)\nCorking(wildon)\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Donnish(x))\nforall x (Donnish(x) and Carbonic(x) -> Appalled(x))\nforall x (Corking(x) and Donnish(x) -> Carbonic(x))\nforall x (Corking(x) -> Donnish(x))\nCaptive(filbert) and Hatted(filbert) -> Donnish(filbert)\nforall x (Captive(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Donnish(x))\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Corking(x))\nforall x (Appalled(x) and Carbonic(x) -> Unflavored(x))\n\nnot Corking(filbert)\n\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Corking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Abbi is semite. Abbi is yawning. Shanie is eastward. If someone is biradial then they are semite. Furry, techy people are powdery. If someone is eastward and semite then they are techy. If someone is eastward then they are semite. If Abbi is biradial and Abbi is yawning then Abbi is semite. If someone is biradial and isotopic then they are semite. Cold people are eastward. All powdery, techy people are isotopic. Abbi is powdery.", "logic": "\nSemite(abbi)\nYawning(abbi)\nEastward(shanie)\nforall x (Biradial(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) and Techy(x) -> Powdery(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) and Semite(x) -> Techy(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Semite(x))\nBiradial(abbi) and Yawning(abbi) -> Semite(abbi)\nforall x (Biradial(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Biradial(x) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Powdery(x) and Techy(x) -> Isotopic(x))\n\nPowdery(abbi)\n\nforall x (Semite(x) and Techy(x) -> Powdery(x)) <- forall x (Eastward(x) and Semite(x) -> Techy(x)) <- forall x (Biradial(x) -> Eastward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Reena is awake. Reena is calando. Roselin is resultant. If someone is graspable then they are awake. Furry, megascopic people are disquieted. If someone is resultant and awake then they are megascopic. If someone is resultant then they are awake. If Reena is graspable and Reena is calando then Reena is awake. If someone is graspable and bountied then they are awake. Cold people are resultant. All disquieted, megascopic people are bountied. Reena is not megascopic.", "logic": "\nAwake(reena)\nCalando(reena)\nResultant(roselin)\nforall x (Graspable(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) and Megascopic(x) -> Disquieted(x))\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Awake(x) -> Megascopic(x))\nforall x (Resultant(x) -> Awake(x))\nGraspable(reena) and Calando(reena) -> Awake(reena)\nforall x (Graspable(x) and Bountied(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Graspable(x) -> Resultant(x))\nforall x (Disquieted(x) and Megascopic(x) -> Bountied(x))\n\nnot Megascopic(reena)\n\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Awake(x) -> Megascopic(x)) <- forall x (Graspable(x) -> Resultant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Bobbie is apologetic. Bobbie is innocuous. Cappella is eighth. If someone is puritanic then they are apologetic. Furry, clammy people are global. If someone is eighth and apologetic then they are clammy. If someone is eighth then they are apologetic. If Bobbie is puritanic and Bobbie is innocuous then Bobbie is apologetic. If someone is puritanic and leechlike then they are apologetic. Cold people are eighth. All global, clammy people are leechlike. Bobbie is puritanic.", "logic": "\nApologetic(bobbie)\nInnocuous(bobbie)\nEighth(cappella)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) and Clammy(x) -> Global(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Apologetic(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nPuritanic(bobbie) and Innocuous(bobbie) -> Apologetic(bobbie)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) and Leechlike(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Puritanic(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Global(x) and Clammy(x) -> Leechlike(x))\n\nPuritanic(bobbie)\n\nPuritanic(bobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Sherry is indelible. Sherry is base. Natalina is spayed. If someone is unnoticed then they are indelible. Furry, eristical people are bookish. If someone is spayed and indelible then they are eristical. If someone is spayed then they are indelible. If Sherry is unnoticed and Sherry is base then Sherry is indelible. If someone is unnoticed and hierarchic then they are indelible. Cold people are spayed. All bookish, eristical people are hierarchic. Natalina is not unnoticed.", "logic": "\nIndelible(sherry)\nBase(sherry)\nSpayed(natalina)\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) -> Indelible(x))\nforall x (Indelible(x) and Eristical(x) -> Bookish(x))\nforall x (Spayed(x) and Indelible(x) -> Eristical(x))\nforall x (Spayed(x) -> Indelible(x))\nUnnoticed(sherry) and Base(sherry) -> Indelible(sherry)\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> Indelible(x))\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) -> Spayed(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) and Eristical(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\n\nnot Unnoticed(natalina)\n\nnot Unnoticed(natalina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "Broddy is wakeful. Broddy is malefic. Hobart is rural. If someone is whole then they are wakeful. Furry, littler people are unheated. If someone is rural and wakeful then they are littler. If someone is rural then they are wakeful. If Broddy is whole and Broddy is malefic then Broddy is wakeful. If someone is whole and viricidal then they are wakeful. Cold people are rural. All unheated, littler people are viricidal. Hobart is malefic.", "logic": "\nWakeful(broddy)\nMalefic(broddy)\nRural(hobart)\nforall x (Whole(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) and Littler(x) -> Unheated(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and Wakeful(x) -> Littler(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nWhole(broddy) and Malefic(broddy) -> Wakeful(broddy)\nforall x (Whole(x) and Viricidal(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Whole(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Unheated(x) and Littler(x) -> Viricidal(x))\n\nMalefic(hobart)\n\nMalefic(hobart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2176"} {"premises": "The joanna ensure the gerard. The gerard relinquish the maurice. The gerard relinquish the ernesto. The gerard is uttermost. The maurice relinquish the gerard. The maurice relinquish the ernesto. The ernesto relinquish the gerard. If the gerard is addable and the gerard does not see the joanna then the joanna ensure the ernesto. If someone is strong and they do not chase the ernesto then the ernesto ensure the joanna. If someone is addable and they see the joanna then they are coccal. If someone is strong and uttermost then they chase the joanna. If someone relinquish the maurice then they are strong. If someone ensure the maurice and the maurice does not chase the ernesto then the maurice does not see the joanna. The gerard relinquish the ernesto.", "logic": "\nEnsure(joanna, gerard)\nRelinquish(gerard, maurice)\nRelinquish(gerard, ernesto)\nUttermost(gerard)\nRelinquish(maurice, gerard)\nRelinquish(maurice, ernesto)\nRelinquish(ernesto, gerard)\nAddable(gerard) and not Trample(gerard, joanna) -> Ensure(joanna, ernesto)\nforall x (Strong(x) and not Relinquish(x, ernesto) -> Ensure(ernesto, joanna))\nforall x (Addable(x) and Trample(x, joanna) -> Coccal(x))\nforall x (Strong(x) and Uttermost(x) -> Relinquish(x, joanna))\nforall x (Relinquish(x, maurice) -> Strong(x))\nforall x (Ensure(x, maurice) and not Relinquish(maurice, ernesto) -> not Trample(maurice, joanna))\n\nRelinquish(gerard, ernesto)\n\ntherefore Relinquish(gerard, ernesto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The ham sleepwalk the cherish. The cherish override the demetre. The cherish override the arlen. The cherish is phyletic. The demetre override the cherish. The demetre override the arlen. The arlen override the cherish. If the cherish is undatable and the cherish does not see the ham then the ham sleepwalk the arlen. If someone is gradual and they do not chase the arlen then the arlen sleepwalk the ham. If someone is undatable and they see the ham then they are pantropic. If someone is gradual and phyletic then they chase the ham. If someone override the demetre then they are gradual. If someone sleepwalk the demetre and the demetre does not chase the arlen then the demetre does not see the ham. The demetre does not chase the cherish.", "logic": "\nSleepwalk(ham, cherish)\nOverride(cherish, demetre)\nOverride(cherish, arlen)\nPhyletic(cherish)\nOverride(demetre, cherish)\nOverride(demetre, arlen)\nOverride(arlen, cherish)\nUndatable(cherish) and not Iterate(cherish, ham) -> Sleepwalk(ham, arlen)\nforall x (Gradual(x) and not Override(x, arlen) -> Sleepwalk(arlen, ham))\nforall x (Undatable(x) and Iterate(x, ham) -> Pantropic(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) and Phyletic(x) -> Override(x, ham))\nforall x (Override(x, demetre) -> Gradual(x))\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, demetre) and not Override(demetre, arlen) -> not Iterate(demetre, ham))\n\nnot Override(demetre, cherish)\n\ntherefore Override(demetre, cherish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The marlena calcine the katuscha. The katuscha disown the wynn. The katuscha disown the lana. The katuscha is stable. The wynn disown the katuscha. The wynn disown the lana. The lana disown the katuscha. If the katuscha is grubby and the katuscha does not see the marlena then the marlena calcine the lana. If someone is macho and they do not chase the lana then the lana calcine the marlena. If someone is grubby and they see the marlena then they are thumbed. If someone is macho and stable then they chase the marlena. If someone disown the wynn then they are macho. If someone calcine the wynn and the wynn does not chase the lana then the wynn does not see the marlena. The katuscha is macho.", "logic": "\nCalcine(marlena, katuscha)\nDisown(katuscha, wynn)\nDisown(katuscha, lana)\nStable(katuscha)\nDisown(wynn, katuscha)\nDisown(wynn, lana)\nDisown(lana, katuscha)\nGrubby(katuscha) and not Razor(katuscha, marlena) -> Calcine(marlena, lana)\nforall x (Macho(x) and not Disown(x, lana) -> Calcine(lana, marlena))\nforall x (Grubby(x) and Razor(x, marlena) -> Thumbed(x))\nforall x (Macho(x) and Stable(x) -> Disown(x, marlena))\nforall x (Disown(x, wynn) -> Macho(x))\nforall x (Calcine(x, wynn) and not Disown(wynn, lana) -> not Razor(wynn, marlena))\n\nMacho(katuscha)\n\nDisown(katuscha, wynn) and forall x (Disown(x, wynn) -> Macho(x)) -> therefore Macho(katuscha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The maggie result the jaquith. The jaquith nasalise the ursala. The jaquith nasalise the abbi. The jaquith is mousy. The ursala nasalise the jaquith. The ursala nasalise the abbi. The abbi nasalise the jaquith. If the jaquith is peculiar and the jaquith does not see the maggie then the maggie result the abbi. If someone is colonnaded and they do not chase the abbi then the abbi result the maggie. If someone is peculiar and they see the maggie then they are radical. If someone is colonnaded and mousy then they chase the maggie. If someone nasalise the ursala then they are colonnaded. If someone result the ursala and the ursala does not chase the abbi then the ursala does not see the maggie. The jaquith is not colonnaded.", "logic": "\nResult(maggie, jaquith)\nNasalise(jaquith, ursala)\nNasalise(jaquith, abbi)\nMousy(jaquith)\nNasalise(ursala, jaquith)\nNasalise(ursala, abbi)\nNasalise(abbi, jaquith)\nPeculiar(jaquith) and not Stamp(jaquith, maggie) -> Result(maggie, abbi)\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) and not Nasalise(x, abbi) -> Result(abbi, maggie))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) and Stamp(x, maggie) -> Radical(x))\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) and Mousy(x) -> Nasalise(x, maggie))\nforall x (Nasalise(x, ursala) -> Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Result(x, ursala) and not Nasalise(ursala, abbi) -> not Stamp(ursala, maggie))\n\nnot Colonnaded(jaquith)\n\nNasalise(jaquith, ursala) and forall x (Nasalise(x, ursala) -> Colonnaded(x)) -> therefore Colonnaded(jaquith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The paige deluge the loreen. The loreen buffalo the barnabe. The loreen buffalo the germain. The loreen is vinegary. The barnabe buffalo the loreen. The barnabe buffalo the germain. The germain buffalo the loreen. If the loreen is unfurrowed and the loreen does not see the paige then the paige deluge the germain. If someone is blurred and they do not chase the germain then the germain deluge the paige. If someone is unfurrowed and they see the paige then they are blase. If someone is blurred and vinegary then they chase the paige. If someone buffalo the barnabe then they are blurred. If someone deluge the barnabe and the barnabe does not chase the germain then the barnabe does not see the paige. The loreen buffalo the paige.", "logic": "\nDeluge(paige, loreen)\nBuffalo(loreen, barnabe)\nBuffalo(loreen, germain)\nVinegary(loreen)\nBuffalo(barnabe, loreen)\nBuffalo(barnabe, germain)\nBuffalo(germain, loreen)\nUnfurrowed(loreen) and not Dehumanize(loreen, paige) -> Deluge(paige, germain)\nforall x (Blurred(x) and not Buffalo(x, germain) -> Deluge(germain, paige))\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) and Dehumanize(x, paige) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Blurred(x) and Vinegary(x) -> Buffalo(x, paige))\nforall x (Buffalo(x, barnabe) -> Blurred(x))\nforall x (Deluge(x, barnabe) and not Buffalo(barnabe, germain) -> not Dehumanize(barnabe, paige))\n\nBuffalo(loreen, paige)\n\nBuffalo(loreen, barnabe) and forall x (Buffalo(x, barnabe) -> Blurred(x)) -> therefore Blurred(loreen) Blurred(loreen) and Vinegary(loreen) and forall x (Blurred(x) and Vinegary(x) -> Buffalo(x, paige)) -> therefore Buffalo(loreen, paige)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The nichole abdicate the myrle. The myrle heat the guinevere. The myrle heat the rubina. The myrle is lame. The guinevere heat the myrle. The guinevere heat the rubina. The rubina heat the myrle. If the myrle is slithering and the myrle does not see the nichole then the nichole abdicate the rubina. If someone is butyric and they do not chase the rubina then the rubina abdicate the nichole. If someone is slithering and they see the nichole then they are dyspeptic. If someone is butyric and lame then they chase the nichole. If someone heat the guinevere then they are butyric. If someone abdicate the guinevere and the guinevere does not chase the rubina then the guinevere does not see the nichole. The myrle does not chase the nichole.", "logic": "\nAbdicate(nichole, myrle)\nHeat(myrle, guinevere)\nHeat(myrle, rubina)\nLame(myrle)\nHeat(guinevere, myrle)\nHeat(guinevere, rubina)\nHeat(rubina, myrle)\nSlithering(myrle) and not Feudalize(myrle, nichole) -> Abdicate(nichole, rubina)\nforall x (Butyric(x) and not Heat(x, rubina) -> Abdicate(rubina, nichole))\nforall x (Slithering(x) and Feudalize(x, nichole) -> Dyspeptic(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) and Lame(x) -> Heat(x, nichole))\nforall x (Heat(x, guinevere) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, guinevere) and not Heat(guinevere, rubina) -> not Feudalize(guinevere, nichole))\n\nnot Heat(myrle, nichole)\n\nHeat(myrle, guinevere) and forall x (Heat(x, guinevere) -> Butyric(x)) -> therefore Butyric(myrle) Butyric(myrle) and Lame(myrle) and forall x (Butyric(x) and Lame(x) -> Heat(x, nichole)) -> therefore Heat(myrle, nichole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The reggie blemish the olag. The olag debug the winfred. The olag debug the derby. The olag is untenable. The winfred debug the olag. The winfred debug the derby. The derby debug the olag. If the olag is bereft and the olag does not see the reggie then the reggie blemish the derby. If someone is autolytic and they do not chase the derby then the derby blemish the reggie. If someone is bereft and they see the reggie then they are unrelieved. If someone is autolytic and untenable then they chase the reggie. If someone debug the winfred then they are autolytic. If someone blemish the winfred and the winfred does not chase the derby then the winfred does not see the reggie. The reggie is not unrelieved.", "logic": "\nBlemish(reggie, olag)\nDebug(olag, winfred)\nDebug(olag, derby)\nUntenable(olag)\nDebug(winfred, olag)\nDebug(winfred, derby)\nDebug(derby, olag)\nBereft(olag) and not Dispatch(olag, reggie) -> Blemish(reggie, derby)\nforall x (Autolytic(x) and not Debug(x, derby) -> Blemish(derby, reggie))\nforall x (Bereft(x) and Dispatch(x, reggie) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Autolytic(x) and Untenable(x) -> Debug(x, reggie))\nforall x (Debug(x, winfred) -> Autolytic(x))\nforall x (Blemish(x, winfred) and not Debug(winfred, derby) -> not Dispatch(winfred, reggie))\n\nnot Unrelieved(reggie)\n\nforall x (Bereft(x) and Dispatch(x, reggie) -> Unrelieved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The han convict the stacia. The stacia grouch the trip. The stacia grouch the roxanna. The stacia is misplaced. The trip grouch the stacia. The trip grouch the roxanna. The roxanna grouch the stacia. If the stacia is glaucous and the stacia does not see the han then the han convict the roxanna. If someone is auditory and they do not chase the roxanna then the roxanna convict the han. If someone is glaucous and they see the han then they are bistroic. If someone is auditory and misplaced then they chase the han. If someone grouch the trip then they are auditory. If someone convict the trip and the trip does not chase the roxanna then the trip does not see the han. The roxanna is auditory.", "logic": "\nConvict(han, stacia)\nGrouch(stacia, trip)\nGrouch(stacia, roxanna)\nMisplaced(stacia)\nGrouch(trip, stacia)\nGrouch(trip, roxanna)\nGrouch(roxanna, stacia)\nGlaucous(stacia) and not Schnorr(stacia, han) -> Convict(han, roxanna)\nforall x (Auditory(x) and not Grouch(x, roxanna) -> Convict(roxanna, han))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) and Schnorr(x, han) -> Bistroic(x))\nforall x (Auditory(x) and Misplaced(x) -> Grouch(x, han))\nforall x (Grouch(x, trip) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Convict(x, trip) and not Grouch(trip, roxanna) -> not Schnorr(trip, han))\n\nAuditory(roxanna)\n\nforall x (Grouch(x, trip) -> Auditory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The mason reek the deni. The deni railroad the kimbra. The deni railroad the deirdre. The deni is melancholy. The kimbra railroad the deni. The kimbra railroad the deirdre. The deirdre railroad the deni. If the deni is overdone and the deni does not see the mason then the mason reek the deirdre. If someone is amateur and they do not chase the deirdre then the deirdre reek the mason. If someone is overdone and they see the mason then they are unpierced. If someone is amateur and melancholy then they chase the mason. If someone railroad the kimbra then they are amateur. If someone reek the kimbra and the kimbra does not chase the deirdre then the kimbra does not see the mason. The mason does not chase the mason.", "logic": "\nReek(mason, deni)\nRailroad(deni, kimbra)\nRailroad(deni, deirdre)\nMelancholy(deni)\nRailroad(kimbra, deni)\nRailroad(kimbra, deirdre)\nRailroad(deirdre, deni)\nOverdone(deni) and not Beach(deni, mason) -> Reek(mason, deirdre)\nforall x (Amateur(x) and not Railroad(x, deirdre) -> Reek(deirdre, mason))\nforall x (Overdone(x) and Beach(x, mason) -> Unpierced(x))\nforall x (Amateur(x) and Melancholy(x) -> Railroad(x, mason))\nforall x (Railroad(x, kimbra) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Reek(x, kimbra) and not Railroad(kimbra, deirdre) -> not Beach(kimbra, mason))\n\nnot Railroad(mason, mason)\n\nforall x (Amateur(x) and Melancholy(x) -> Railroad(x, mason)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The dania sentence the rosaline. The rosaline hunch the garwood. The rosaline hunch the stewart. The rosaline is bosky. The garwood hunch the rosaline. The garwood hunch the stewart. The stewart hunch the rosaline. If the rosaline is knackered and the rosaline does not see the dania then the dania sentence the stewart. If someone is undisputed and they do not chase the stewart then the stewart sentence the dania. If someone is knackered and they see the dania then they are negligent. If someone is undisputed and bosky then they chase the dania. If someone hunch the garwood then they are undisputed. If someone sentence the garwood and the garwood does not chase the stewart then the garwood does not see the dania. The stewart intern the dania.", "logic": "\nSentence(dania, rosaline)\nHunch(rosaline, garwood)\nHunch(rosaline, stewart)\nBosky(rosaline)\nHunch(garwood, rosaline)\nHunch(garwood, stewart)\nHunch(stewart, rosaline)\nKnackered(rosaline) and not Intern(rosaline, dania) -> Sentence(dania, stewart)\nforall x (Undisputed(x) and not Hunch(x, stewart) -> Sentence(stewart, dania))\nforall x (Knackered(x) and Intern(x, dania) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Undisputed(x) and Bosky(x) -> Hunch(x, dania))\nforall x (Hunch(x, garwood) -> Undisputed(x))\nforall x (Sentence(x, garwood) and not Hunch(garwood, stewart) -> not Intern(garwood, dania))\n\nIntern(stewart, dania)\n\nIntern(stewart, dania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The prescott vein the kellina. The kellina absorb the othella. The kellina absorb the natty. The kellina is fringy. The othella absorb the kellina. The othella absorb the natty. The natty absorb the kellina. If the kellina is thirsty and the kellina does not see the prescott then the prescott vein the natty. If someone is healed and they do not chase the natty then the natty vein the prescott. If someone is thirsty and they see the prescott then they are neurotoxic. If someone is healed and fringy then they chase the prescott. If someone absorb the othella then they are healed. If someone vein the othella and the othella does not chase the natty then the othella does not see the prescott. The othella does not visit the natty.", "logic": "\nVein(prescott, kellina)\nAbsorb(kellina, othella)\nAbsorb(kellina, natty)\nFringy(kellina)\nAbsorb(othella, kellina)\nAbsorb(othella, natty)\nAbsorb(natty, kellina)\nThirsty(kellina) and not Evoke(kellina, prescott) -> Vein(prescott, natty)\nforall x (Healed(x) and not Absorb(x, natty) -> Vein(natty, prescott))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) and Evoke(x, prescott) -> Neurotoxic(x))\nforall x (Healed(x) and Fringy(x) -> Absorb(x, prescott))\nforall x (Absorb(x, othella) -> Healed(x))\nforall x (Vein(x, othella) and not Absorb(othella, natty) -> not Evoke(othella, prescott))\n\nnot Vein(othella, natty)\n\nnot Vein(othella, natty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The jerrold brine the parrnell. The parrnell camp the rickie. The parrnell camp the wilma. The parrnell is subclavian. The rickie camp the parrnell. The rickie camp the wilma. The wilma camp the parrnell. If the parrnell is alar and the parrnell does not see the jerrold then the jerrold brine the wilma. If someone is rigged and they do not chase the wilma then the wilma brine the jerrold. If someone is alar and they see the jerrold then they are rubbery. If someone is rigged and subclavian then they chase the jerrold. If someone camp the rickie then they are rigged. If someone brine the rickie and the rickie does not chase the wilma then the rickie does not see the jerrold. The jerrold is red.", "logic": "\nBrine(jerrold, parrnell)\nCamp(parrnell, rickie)\nCamp(parrnell, wilma)\nSubclavian(parrnell)\nCamp(rickie, parrnell)\nCamp(rickie, wilma)\nCamp(wilma, parrnell)\nAlar(parrnell) and not Flame(parrnell, jerrold) -> Brine(jerrold, wilma)\nforall x (Rigged(x) and not Camp(x, wilma) -> Brine(wilma, jerrold))\nforall x (Alar(x) and Flame(x, jerrold) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Rigged(x) and Subclavian(x) -> Camp(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Camp(x, rickie) -> Rigged(x))\nforall x (Brine(x, rickie) and not Camp(rickie, wilma) -> not Flame(rickie, jerrold))\n\nRed(jerrold)\n\nRed(jerrold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-260"} {"premises": "The teddie is plumed. The teddie renege the felicdad. The teddie prick the ginnifer. The ginnifer is hideous. The ginnifer is witty. The ginnifer prick the teddie. The felicdad is hideous. If something prick the ginnifer and the ginnifer is hideous then the ginnifer renege the felicdad. If something renege the felicdad then it shed the felicdad. If the felicdad prick the teddie then the felicdad is witty. The teddie renege the felicdad.", "logic": "\nPlumed(teddie)\nRenege(teddie, felicdad)\nPrick(teddie, ginnifer)\nHideous(ginnifer)\nWitty(ginnifer)\nPrick(ginnifer, teddie)\nHideous(felicdad)\nforall x (Prick(x, ginnifer) and Hideous(ginnifer) -> Renege(ginnifer, felicdad))\nforall x (Renege(x, felicdad) -> Shed(x, felicdad))\nPrick(felicdad, teddie) -> Witty(felicdad)\n\nRenege(teddie, felicdad)\n\ntherefore Renege(teddie, felicdad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The acacia is uppermost. The acacia underspend the adolf. The acacia contort the rayshell. The rayshell is oblong. The rayshell is headstrong. The rayshell contort the acacia. The adolf is oblong. If something contort the rayshell and the rayshell is oblong then the rayshell underspend the adolf. If something underspend the adolf then it scud the adolf. If the adolf contort the acacia then the adolf is headstrong. The adolf is not oblong.", "logic": "\nUppermost(acacia)\nUnderspend(acacia, adolf)\nContort(acacia, rayshell)\nOblong(rayshell)\nHeadstrong(rayshell)\nContort(rayshell, acacia)\nOblong(adolf)\nforall x (Contort(x, rayshell) and Oblong(rayshell) -> Underspend(rayshell, adolf))\nforall x (Underspend(x, adolf) -> Scud(x, adolf))\nContort(adolf, acacia) -> Headstrong(adolf)\n\nnot Oblong(adolf)\n\ntherefore Oblong(adolf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The bobbette is voltaic. The bobbette rubbish the kylynn. The bobbette cavern the wendell. The wendell is cubic. The wendell is dumb. The wendell cavern the bobbette. The kylynn is cubic. If something cavern the wendell and the wendell is cubic then the wendell rubbish the kylynn. If something rubbish the kylynn then it homologise the kylynn. If the kylynn cavern the bobbette then the kylynn is dumb. The bobbette homologise the kylynn.", "logic": "\nVoltaic(bobbette)\nRubbish(bobbette, kylynn)\nCavern(bobbette, wendell)\nCubic(wendell)\nDumb(wendell)\nCavern(wendell, bobbette)\nCubic(kylynn)\nforall x (Cavern(x, wendell) and Cubic(wendell) -> Rubbish(wendell, kylynn))\nforall x (Rubbish(x, kylynn) -> Homologise(x, kylynn))\nCavern(kylynn, bobbette) -> Dumb(kylynn)\n\nHomologise(bobbette, kylynn)\n\nRubbish(bobbette, kylynn) and forall x (Rubbish(x, kylynn) -> Homologise(x, kylynn)) -> therefore Homologise(bobbette, kylynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The joscelin is keen. The joscelin ebonize the spiro. The joscelin infiltrate the chance. The chance is spasmodic. The chance is local. The chance infiltrate the joscelin. The spiro is spasmodic. If something infiltrate the chance and the chance is spasmodic then the chance ebonize the spiro. If something ebonize the spiro then it reinstall the spiro. If the spiro infiltrate the joscelin then the spiro is local. The chance does not like the spiro.", "logic": "\nKeen(joscelin)\nEbonize(joscelin, spiro)\nInfiltrate(joscelin, chance)\nSpasmodic(chance)\nLocal(chance)\nInfiltrate(chance, joscelin)\nSpasmodic(spiro)\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, chance) and Spasmodic(chance) -> Ebonize(chance, spiro))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, spiro) -> Reinstall(x, spiro))\nInfiltrate(spiro, joscelin) -> Local(spiro)\n\nnot Ebonize(chance, spiro)\n\nInfiltrate(joscelin, chance) and Spasmodic(chance) and forall x (Infiltrate(x, chance) and Spasmodic(chance) -> Ebonize(chance, spiro)) -> therefore Ebonize(chance, spiro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The othello is contrite. The othello ghettoize the elle. The othello skimcoat the salome. The salome is lucky. The salome is gaga. The salome skimcoat the othello. The elle is lucky. If something skimcoat the salome and the salome is lucky then the salome ghettoize the elle. If something ghettoize the elle then it mend the elle. If the elle skimcoat the othello then the elle is gaga. The salome mend the elle.", "logic": "\nContrite(othello)\nGhettoize(othello, elle)\nSkimcoat(othello, salome)\nLucky(salome)\nGaga(salome)\nSkimcoat(salome, othello)\nLucky(elle)\nforall x (Skimcoat(x, salome) and Lucky(salome) -> Ghettoize(salome, elle))\nforall x (Ghettoize(x, elle) -> Mend(x, elle))\nSkimcoat(elle, othello) -> Gaga(elle)\n\nMend(salome, elle)\n\nSkimcoat(othello, salome) and Lucky(salome) and forall x (Skimcoat(x, salome) and Lucky(salome) -> Ghettoize(salome, elle)) -> therefore Ghettoize(salome, elle) Ghettoize(salome, elle) and forall x (Ghettoize(x, elle) -> Mend(x, elle)) -> therefore Mend(salome, elle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The rana is distorted. The rana recognize the jarrett. The rana coinsure the marmaduke. The marmaduke is semestral. The marmaduke is cerebral. The marmaduke coinsure the rana. The jarrett is semestral. If something coinsure the marmaduke and the marmaduke is semestral then the marmaduke recognize the jarrett. If something recognize the jarrett then it outstrip the jarrett. If the jarrett coinsure the rana then the jarrett is cerebral. The marmaduke does not chase the jarrett.", "logic": "\nDistorted(rana)\nRecognize(rana, jarrett)\nCoinsure(rana, marmaduke)\nSemestral(marmaduke)\nCerebral(marmaduke)\nCoinsure(marmaduke, rana)\nSemestral(jarrett)\nforall x (Coinsure(x, marmaduke) and Semestral(marmaduke) -> Recognize(marmaduke, jarrett))\nforall x (Recognize(x, jarrett) -> Outstrip(x, jarrett))\nCoinsure(jarrett, rana) -> Cerebral(jarrett)\n\nnot Outstrip(marmaduke, jarrett)\n\nCoinsure(rana, marmaduke) and Semestral(marmaduke) and forall x (Coinsure(x, marmaduke) and Semestral(marmaduke) -> Recognize(marmaduke, jarrett)) -> therefore Recognize(marmaduke, jarrett) Recognize(marmaduke, jarrett) and forall x (Recognize(x, jarrett) -> Outstrip(x, jarrett)) -> therefore Outstrip(marmaduke, jarrett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The chrisy is employable. The chrisy remit the gilles. The chrisy unhitch the thaxter. The thaxter is plausible. The thaxter is velar. The thaxter unhitch the chrisy. The gilles is plausible. If something unhitch the thaxter and the thaxter is plausible then the thaxter remit the gilles. If something remit the gilles then it cough the gilles. If the gilles unhitch the chrisy then the gilles is velar. The gilles is not velar.", "logic": "\nEmployable(chrisy)\nRemit(chrisy, gilles)\nUnhitch(chrisy, thaxter)\nPlausible(thaxter)\nVelar(thaxter)\nUnhitch(thaxter, chrisy)\nPlausible(gilles)\nforall x (Unhitch(x, thaxter) and Plausible(thaxter) -> Remit(thaxter, gilles))\nforall x (Remit(x, gilles) -> Cough(x, gilles))\nUnhitch(gilles, chrisy) -> Velar(gilles)\n\nnot Velar(gilles)\n\nUnhitch(gilles, chrisy) -> Velar(gilles) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The carolie is bestial. The carolie adjudge the doralynne. The carolie jelly the kaycee. The kaycee is dour. The kaycee is choric. The kaycee jelly the carolie. The doralynne is dour. If something jelly the kaycee and the kaycee is dour then the kaycee adjudge the doralynne. If something adjudge the doralynne then it occlude the doralynne. If the doralynne jelly the carolie then the doralynne is choric. The doralynne occlude the doralynne.", "logic": "\nBestial(carolie)\nAdjudge(carolie, doralynne)\nJelly(carolie, kaycee)\nDour(kaycee)\nChoric(kaycee)\nJelly(kaycee, carolie)\nDour(doralynne)\nforall x (Jelly(x, kaycee) and Dour(kaycee) -> Adjudge(kaycee, doralynne))\nforall x (Adjudge(x, doralynne) -> Occlude(x, doralynne))\nJelly(doralynne, carolie) -> Choric(doralynne)\n\nOcclude(doralynne, doralynne)\n\nforall x (Adjudge(x, doralynne) -> Occlude(x, doralynne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The melisande is eighteenth. The melisande bombilate the ranee. The melisande swelter the reid. The reid is earthbound. The reid is cousinly. The reid swelter the melisande. The ranee is earthbound. If something swelter the reid and the reid is earthbound then the reid bombilate the ranee. If something bombilate the ranee then it seed the ranee. If the ranee swelter the melisande then the ranee is cousinly. The ranee is not green.", "logic": "\nEighteenth(melisande)\nBombilate(melisande, ranee)\nSwelter(melisande, reid)\nEarthbound(reid)\nCousinly(reid)\nSwelter(reid, melisande)\nEarthbound(ranee)\nforall x (Swelter(x, reid) and Earthbound(reid) -> Bombilate(reid, ranee))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, ranee) -> Seed(x, ranee))\nSwelter(ranee, melisande) -> Cousinly(ranee)\n\nnot Green(ranee)\n\nnot Green(ranee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The shelia is corrected. The shelia customise the shawna. The shelia interbreed the pepito. The pepito is rarified. The pepito is proven. The pepito interbreed the shelia. The shawna is rarified. If something interbreed the pepito and the pepito is rarified then the pepito customise the shawna. If something customise the shawna then it inosculate the shawna. If the shawna interbreed the shelia then the shawna is proven. The shawna interbreed the shawna.", "logic": "\nCorrected(shelia)\nCustomise(shelia, shawna)\nInterbreed(shelia, pepito)\nRarified(pepito)\nProven(pepito)\nInterbreed(pepito, shelia)\nRarified(shawna)\nforall x (Interbreed(x, pepito) and Rarified(pepito) -> Customise(pepito, shawna))\nforall x (Customise(x, shawna) -> Inosculate(x, shawna))\nInterbreed(shawna, shelia) -> Proven(shawna)\n\nInterbreed(shawna, shawna)\n\nInterbreed(shawna, shawna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The freddi is feverous. The freddi reorient the patience. The freddi persecute the saba. The saba is unlocked. The saba is buffeted. The saba persecute the freddi. The patience is unlocked. If something persecute the saba and the saba is unlocked then the saba reorient the patience. If something reorient the patience then it overboil the patience. If the patience persecute the freddi then the patience is buffeted. The freddi does not like the freddi.", "logic": "\nFeverous(freddi)\nReorient(freddi, patience)\nPersecute(freddi, saba)\nUnlocked(saba)\nBuffeted(saba)\nPersecute(saba, freddi)\nUnlocked(patience)\nforall x (Persecute(x, saba) and Unlocked(saba) -> Reorient(saba, patience))\nforall x (Reorient(x, patience) -> Overboil(x, patience))\nPersecute(patience, freddi) -> Buffeted(patience)\n\nnot Reorient(freddi, freddi)\n\nnot Reorient(freddi, freddi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The shepperd is elastic. The shepperd smatter the fan. The shepperd outbid the rosita. The rosita is runty. The rosita is unfocussed. The rosita outbid the shepperd. The fan is runty. If something outbid the rosita and the rosita is runty then the rosita smatter the fan. If something smatter the fan then it catenate the fan. If the fan outbid the shepperd then the fan is unfocussed. The rosita outbid the fan.", "logic": "\nElastic(shepperd)\nSmatter(shepperd, fan)\nOutbid(shepperd, rosita)\nRunty(rosita)\nUnfocussed(rosita)\nOutbid(rosita, shepperd)\nRunty(fan)\nforall x (Outbid(x, rosita) and Runty(rosita) -> Smatter(rosita, fan))\nforall x (Smatter(x, fan) -> Catenate(x, fan))\nOutbid(fan, shepperd) -> Unfocussed(fan)\n\nOutbid(rosita, fan)\n\nOutbid(rosita, fan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "Redmond is tidal. Redmond is royal. Donn is garmented. Donn is lethal. Donn is royal. Donn is surplus. Donn is algometric. Donn is fluid. Iris is tidal. Iris is garmented. Iris is royal. Iris is surplus. Iris is algometric. Iris is fluid. Tybie is tidal. Tybie is royal. If someone is lethal and tidal then they are surplus. If Tybie is royal then Tybie is lethal. Tybie is royal.", "logic": "\nTidal(redmond)\nRoyal(redmond)\nGarmented(donn)\nLethal(donn)\nRoyal(donn)\nSurplus(donn)\nAlgometric(donn)\nFluid(donn)\nTidal(iris)\nGarmented(iris)\nRoyal(iris)\nSurplus(iris)\nAlgometric(iris)\nFluid(iris)\nTidal(tybie)\nRoyal(tybie)\nforall x (Lethal(x) and Tidal(x) -> Surplus(x))\nRoyal(tybie) -> Lethal(tybie)\n\nRoyal(tybie)\n\ntherefore Royal(tybie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Jeramie is antennary. Jeramie is nonnative. Sascha is chirpy. Sascha is reeking. Sascha is nonnative. Sascha is checked. Sascha is sauteed. Sascha is slavic. Tiffani is antennary. Tiffani is chirpy. Tiffani is nonnative. Tiffani is checked. Tiffani is sauteed. Tiffani is slavic. Sib is antennary. Sib is nonnative. If someone is reeking and antennary then they are checked. If Sib is nonnative then Sib is reeking. Sascha is not reeking.", "logic": "\nAntennary(jeramie)\nNonnative(jeramie)\nChirpy(sascha)\nReeking(sascha)\nNonnative(sascha)\nChecked(sascha)\nSauteed(sascha)\nSlavic(sascha)\nAntennary(tiffani)\nChirpy(tiffani)\nNonnative(tiffani)\nChecked(tiffani)\nSauteed(tiffani)\nSlavic(tiffani)\nAntennary(sib)\nNonnative(sib)\nforall x (Reeking(x) and Antennary(x) -> Checked(x))\nNonnative(sib) -> Reeking(sib)\n\nnot Reeking(sascha)\n\ntherefore Reeking(sascha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Melamie is coital. Melamie is sylvan. Garv is uncaulked. Garv is barbate. Garv is sylvan. Garv is hearsay. Garv is antheral. Garv is dumbstruck. Demetre is coital. Demetre is uncaulked. Demetre is sylvan. Demetre is hearsay. Demetre is antheral. Demetre is dumbstruck. Abra is coital. Abra is sylvan. If someone is barbate and coital then they are hearsay. If Abra is sylvan then Abra is barbate. Abra is barbate.", "logic": "\nCoital(melamie)\nSylvan(melamie)\nUncaulked(garv)\nBarbate(garv)\nSylvan(garv)\nHearsay(garv)\nAntheral(garv)\nDumbstruck(garv)\nCoital(demetre)\nUncaulked(demetre)\nSylvan(demetre)\nHearsay(demetre)\nAntheral(demetre)\nDumbstruck(demetre)\nCoital(abra)\nSylvan(abra)\nforall x (Barbate(x) and Coital(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nSylvan(abra) -> Barbate(abra)\n\nBarbate(abra)\n\nSylvan(abra) and Sylvan(abra) -> Barbate(abra) -> therefore Barbate(abra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Harvey is erudite. Harvey is algophobic. Rickey is coarctate. Rickey is leavened. Rickey is algophobic. Rickey is wolflike. Rickey is coarse. Rickey is super. Row is erudite. Row is coarctate. Row is algophobic. Row is wolflike. Row is coarse. Row is super. Herrick is erudite. Herrick is algophobic. If someone is leavened and erudite then they are wolflike. If Herrick is algophobic then Herrick is leavened. Herrick is not leavened.", "logic": "\nErudite(harvey)\nAlgophobic(harvey)\nCoarctate(rickey)\nLeavened(rickey)\nAlgophobic(rickey)\nWolflike(rickey)\nCoarse(rickey)\nSuper(rickey)\nErudite(row)\nCoarctate(row)\nAlgophobic(row)\nWolflike(row)\nCoarse(row)\nSuper(row)\nErudite(herrick)\nAlgophobic(herrick)\nforall x (Leavened(x) and Erudite(x) -> Wolflike(x))\nAlgophobic(herrick) -> Leavened(herrick)\n\nnot Leavened(herrick)\n\nAlgophobic(herrick) and Algophobic(herrick) -> Leavened(herrick) -> therefore Leavened(herrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Florry is fungal. Florry is unrenewed. Lissi is orientated. Lissi is nine. Lissi is unrenewed. Lissi is spineless. Lissi is global. Lissi is outright. Elric is fungal. Elric is orientated. Elric is unrenewed. Elric is spineless. Elric is global. Elric is outright. Tomlin is fungal. Tomlin is unrenewed. If someone is nine and fungal then they are spineless. If Tomlin is unrenewed then Tomlin is nine. Tomlin is spineless.", "logic": "\nFungal(florry)\nUnrenewed(florry)\nOrientated(lissi)\nNine(lissi)\nUnrenewed(lissi)\nSpineless(lissi)\nGlobal(lissi)\nOutright(lissi)\nFungal(elric)\nOrientated(elric)\nUnrenewed(elric)\nSpineless(elric)\nGlobal(elric)\nOutright(elric)\nFungal(tomlin)\nUnrenewed(tomlin)\nforall x (Nine(x) and Fungal(x) -> Spineless(x))\nUnrenewed(tomlin) -> Nine(tomlin)\n\nSpineless(tomlin)\n\nUnrenewed(tomlin) and Unrenewed(tomlin) -> Nine(tomlin) -> therefore Nine(tomlin) Nine(tomlin) and Fungal(tomlin) and forall x (Nine(x) and Fungal(x) -> Spineless(x)) -> therefore Spineless(tomlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Timmi is truthful. Timmi is forlorn. Nikkie is dizygotic. Nikkie is overfond. Nikkie is forlorn. Nikkie is underfed. Nikkie is ataxic. Nikkie is maidenlike. Angelica is truthful. Angelica is dizygotic. Angelica is forlorn. Angelica is underfed. Angelica is ataxic. Angelica is maidenlike. Ehud is truthful. Ehud is forlorn. If someone is overfond and truthful then they are underfed. If Ehud is forlorn then Ehud is overfond. Ehud is not underfed.", "logic": "\nTruthful(timmi)\nForlorn(timmi)\nDizygotic(nikkie)\nOverfond(nikkie)\nForlorn(nikkie)\nUnderfed(nikkie)\nAtaxic(nikkie)\nMaidenlike(nikkie)\nTruthful(angelica)\nDizygotic(angelica)\nForlorn(angelica)\nUnderfed(angelica)\nAtaxic(angelica)\nMaidenlike(angelica)\nTruthful(ehud)\nForlorn(ehud)\nforall x (Overfond(x) and Truthful(x) -> Underfed(x))\nForlorn(ehud) -> Overfond(ehud)\n\nnot Underfed(ehud)\n\nForlorn(ehud) and Forlorn(ehud) -> Overfond(ehud) -> therefore Overfond(ehud) Overfond(ehud) and Truthful(ehud) and forall x (Overfond(x) and Truthful(x) -> Underfed(x)) -> therefore Underfed(ehud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Ignatius is handy. Ignatius is neuter. Naomi is bohemian. Naomi is tortious. Naomi is neuter. Naomi is miasmic. Naomi is carbuncled. Naomi is divine. Eveleen is handy. Eveleen is bohemian. Eveleen is neuter. Eveleen is miasmic. Eveleen is carbuncled. Eveleen is divine. Agneta is handy. Agneta is neuter. If someone is tortious and handy then they are miasmic. If Agneta is neuter then Agneta is tortious. Ignatius is not miasmic.", "logic": "\nHandy(ignatius)\nNeuter(ignatius)\nBohemian(naomi)\nTortious(naomi)\nNeuter(naomi)\nMiasmic(naomi)\nCarbuncled(naomi)\nDivine(naomi)\nHandy(eveleen)\nBohemian(eveleen)\nNeuter(eveleen)\nMiasmic(eveleen)\nCarbuncled(eveleen)\nDivine(eveleen)\nHandy(agneta)\nNeuter(agneta)\nforall x (Tortious(x) and Handy(x) -> Miasmic(x))\nNeuter(agneta) -> Tortious(agneta)\n\nnot Miasmic(ignatius)\n\nforall x (Tortious(x) and Handy(x) -> Miasmic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Hedy is seething. Hedy is cataclinal. Annissa is chained. Annissa is exultant. Annissa is cataclinal. Annissa is downwind. Annissa is congenital. Annissa is macaronic. Esther is seething. Esther is chained. Esther is cataclinal. Esther is downwind. Esther is congenital. Esther is macaronic. Kylie is seething. Kylie is cataclinal. If someone is exultant and seething then they are downwind. If Kylie is cataclinal then Kylie is exultant. Hedy is chained.", "logic": "\nSeething(hedy)\nCataclinal(hedy)\nChained(annissa)\nExultant(annissa)\nCataclinal(annissa)\nDownwind(annissa)\nCongenital(annissa)\nMacaronic(annissa)\nSeething(esther)\nChained(esther)\nCataclinal(esther)\nDownwind(esther)\nCongenital(esther)\nMacaronic(esther)\nSeething(kylie)\nCataclinal(kylie)\nforall x (Exultant(x) and Seething(x) -> Downwind(x))\nCataclinal(kylie) -> Exultant(kylie)\n\nChained(hedy)\n\nChained(hedy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Maribel is aquatic. Maribel is anoxemic. Katharina is divisional. Katharina is braided. Katharina is anoxemic. Katharina is limbless. Katharina is peaty. Katharina is unthematic. Wildon is aquatic. Wildon is divisional. Wildon is anoxemic. Wildon is limbless. Wildon is peaty. Wildon is unthematic. Olivette is aquatic. Olivette is anoxemic. If someone is braided and aquatic then they are limbless. If Olivette is anoxemic then Olivette is braided. Maribel is not unthematic.", "logic": "\nAquatic(maribel)\nAnoxemic(maribel)\nDivisional(katharina)\nBraided(katharina)\nAnoxemic(katharina)\nLimbless(katharina)\nPeaty(katharina)\nUnthematic(katharina)\nAquatic(wildon)\nDivisional(wildon)\nAnoxemic(wildon)\nLimbless(wildon)\nPeaty(wildon)\nUnthematic(wildon)\nAquatic(olivette)\nAnoxemic(olivette)\nforall x (Braided(x) and Aquatic(x) -> Limbless(x))\nAnoxemic(olivette) -> Braided(olivette)\n\nnot Unthematic(maribel)\n\nnot Unthematic(maribel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Darby is diatonic. Darby is aglitter. Damara is staunch. Damara is foggy. Damara is aglitter. Damara is hasty. Damara is vagabond. Damara is clear. Xenia is diatonic. Xenia is staunch. Xenia is aglitter. Xenia is hasty. Xenia is vagabond. Xenia is clear. Katerina is diatonic. Katerina is aglitter. If someone is foggy and diatonic then they are hasty. If Katerina is aglitter then Katerina is foggy. Katerina is staunch.", "logic": "\nDiatonic(darby)\nAglitter(darby)\nStaunch(damara)\nFoggy(damara)\nAglitter(damara)\nHasty(damara)\nVagabond(damara)\nClear(damara)\nDiatonic(xenia)\nStaunch(xenia)\nAglitter(xenia)\nHasty(xenia)\nVagabond(xenia)\nClear(xenia)\nDiatonic(katerina)\nAglitter(katerina)\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Diatonic(x) -> Hasty(x))\nAglitter(katerina) -> Foggy(katerina)\n\nStaunch(katerina)\n\nStaunch(katerina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Hermann is centigrade. Hermann is upcountry. Bria is lecherous. Bria is veteran. Bria is upcountry. Bria is plundering. Bria is governing. Bria is mysophobic. Bette is centigrade. Bette is lecherous. Bette is upcountry. Bette is plundering. Bette is governing. Bette is mysophobic. Gretna is centigrade. Gretna is upcountry. If someone is veteran and centigrade then they are plundering. If Gretna is upcountry then Gretna is veteran. Bria is not centigrade.", "logic": "\nCentigrade(hermann)\nUpcountry(hermann)\nLecherous(bria)\nVeteran(bria)\nUpcountry(bria)\nPlundering(bria)\nGoverning(bria)\nMysophobic(bria)\nCentigrade(bette)\nLecherous(bette)\nUpcountry(bette)\nPlundering(bette)\nGoverning(bette)\nMysophobic(bette)\nCentigrade(gretna)\nUpcountry(gretna)\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Centigrade(x) -> Plundering(x))\nUpcountry(gretna) -> Veteran(gretna)\n\nnot Centigrade(bria)\n\nnot Centigrade(bria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "Codee is cruciate. Codee is accumbent. Marcus is preceding. Marcus is conjunct. Marcus is accumbent. Marcus is shelflike. Marcus is polynesian. Marcus is broadband. Garey is cruciate. Garey is preceding. Garey is accumbent. Garey is shelflike. Garey is polynesian. Garey is broadband. Candy is cruciate. Candy is accumbent. If someone is conjunct and cruciate then they are shelflike. If Candy is accumbent then Candy is conjunct. Codee is polynesian.", "logic": "\nCruciate(codee)\nAccumbent(codee)\nPreceding(marcus)\nConjunct(marcus)\nAccumbent(marcus)\nShelflike(marcus)\nPolynesian(marcus)\nBroadband(marcus)\nCruciate(garey)\nPreceding(garey)\nAccumbent(garey)\nShelflike(garey)\nPolynesian(garey)\nBroadband(garey)\nCruciate(candy)\nAccumbent(candy)\nforall x (Conjunct(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Shelflike(x))\nAccumbent(candy) -> Conjunct(candy)\n\nPolynesian(codee)\n\nPolynesian(codee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2226"} {"premises": "The rori site the neale. The ralf is not centric. The ralf exploit the adore. The ralf dynamite the rori. The ralf site the rori. The neale does not like the adore. The neale does not visit the rori. The neale site the ralf. The neale site the adore. The adore exploit the ralf. If someone dynamite the rori then the rori dynamite the ralf. If someone dynamite the rori then they are managerial. If the neale exploit the ralf and the neale is managerial then the ralf is axillary. If someone is managerial and they like the adore then they like the rori. If someone dynamite the neale then the neale does not like the ralf. If the adore is axillary then the adore dynamite the ralf. If the ralf is centric and the ralf is not acting then the ralf exploit the neale. All acting people are adulterous. The neale does not like the adore.", "logic": "\nSite(rori, neale)\nnot Centric(ralf)\nExploit(ralf, adore)\nDynamite(ralf, rori)\nSite(ralf, rori)\nnot Exploit(neale, adore)\nnot Site(neale, rori)\nSite(neale, ralf)\nSite(neale, adore)\nExploit(adore, ralf)\nforall x (Dynamite(x, rori) -> Dynamite(rori, ralf))\nforall x (Dynamite(x, rori) -> Managerial(x))\nExploit(neale, ralf) and Managerial(neale) -> Axillary(ralf)\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Exploit(x, adore) -> Exploit(x, rori))\nforall x (Dynamite(x, neale) -> not Exploit(neale, ralf))\nAxillary(adore) -> Dynamite(adore, ralf)\nCentric(ralf) and not Acting(ralf) -> Exploit(ralf, neale)\nforall x (Acting(x) -> Adulterous(x))\n\nnot Exploit(neale, adore)\n\ntherefore not Exploit(neale, adore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The schroeder cane the anita. The abram is not gloomful. The abram boost the bettina. The abram cocainise the schroeder. The abram cane the schroeder. The anita does not like the bettina. The anita does not visit the schroeder. The anita cane the abram. The anita cane the bettina. The bettina boost the abram. If someone cocainise the schroeder then the schroeder cocainise the abram. If someone cocainise the schroeder then they are haywire. If the anita boost the abram and the anita is haywire then the abram is protective. If someone is haywire and they like the bettina then they like the schroeder. If someone cocainise the anita then the anita does not like the abram. If the bettina is protective then the bettina cocainise the abram. If the abram is gloomful and the abram is not offensive then the abram boost the anita. All offensive people are sectarian. The anita boost the bettina.", "logic": "\nCane(schroeder, anita)\nnot Gloomful(abram)\nBoost(abram, bettina)\nCocainise(abram, schroeder)\nCane(abram, schroeder)\nnot Boost(anita, bettina)\nnot Cane(anita, schroeder)\nCane(anita, abram)\nCane(anita, bettina)\nBoost(bettina, abram)\nforall x (Cocainise(x, schroeder) -> Cocainise(schroeder, abram))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, schroeder) -> Haywire(x))\nBoost(anita, abram) and Haywire(anita) -> Protective(abram)\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Boost(x, bettina) -> Boost(x, schroeder))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, anita) -> not Boost(anita, abram))\nProtective(bettina) -> Cocainise(bettina, abram)\nGloomful(abram) and not Offensive(abram) -> Boost(abram, anita)\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Sectarian(x))\n\nBoost(anita, bettina)\n\ntherefore not Boost(anita, bettina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The nert charge the russell. The silvanus is not equipotent. The silvanus stagger the boniface. The silvanus aquaplane the nert. The silvanus charge the nert. The russell does not like the boniface. The russell does not visit the nert. The russell charge the silvanus. The russell charge the boniface. The boniface stagger the silvanus. If someone aquaplane the nert then the nert aquaplane the silvanus. If someone aquaplane the nert then they are reticulate. If the russell stagger the silvanus and the russell is reticulate then the silvanus is flowering. If someone is reticulate and they like the boniface then they like the nert. If someone aquaplane the russell then the russell does not like the silvanus. If the boniface is flowering then the boniface aquaplane the silvanus. If the silvanus is equipotent and the silvanus is not typical then the silvanus stagger the russell. All typical people are phlegmy. The nert aquaplane the silvanus.", "logic": "\nCharge(nert, russell)\nnot Equipotent(silvanus)\nStagger(silvanus, boniface)\nAquaplane(silvanus, nert)\nCharge(silvanus, nert)\nnot Stagger(russell, boniface)\nnot Charge(russell, nert)\nCharge(russell, silvanus)\nCharge(russell, boniface)\nStagger(boniface, silvanus)\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, nert) -> Aquaplane(nert, silvanus))\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, nert) -> Reticulate(x))\nStagger(russell, silvanus) and Reticulate(russell) -> Flowering(silvanus)\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and Stagger(x, boniface) -> Stagger(x, nert))\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, russell) -> not Stagger(russell, silvanus))\nFlowering(boniface) -> Aquaplane(boniface, silvanus)\nEquipotent(silvanus) and not Typical(silvanus) -> Stagger(silvanus, russell)\nforall x (Typical(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\n\nAquaplane(nert, silvanus)\n\nAquaplane(silvanus, nert) and forall x (Aquaplane(x, nert) -> Aquaplane(nert, silvanus)) -> therefore Aquaplane(nert, silvanus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The bettine butter the merna. The petrina is not reticular. The petrina scamp the lawton. The petrina cuss the bettine. The petrina butter the bettine. The merna does not like the lawton. The merna does not visit the bettine. The merna butter the petrina. The merna butter the lawton. The lawton scamp the petrina. If someone cuss the bettine then the bettine cuss the petrina. If someone cuss the bettine then they are hatted. If the merna scamp the petrina and the merna is hatted then the petrina is overall. If someone is hatted and they like the lawton then they like the bettine. If someone cuss the merna then the merna does not like the petrina. If the lawton is overall then the lawton cuss the petrina. If the petrina is reticular and the petrina is not pedantic then the petrina scamp the merna. All pedantic people are miniscule. The petrina is not hatted.", "logic": "\nButter(bettine, merna)\nnot Reticular(petrina)\nScamp(petrina, lawton)\nCuss(petrina, bettine)\nButter(petrina, bettine)\nnot Scamp(merna, lawton)\nnot Butter(merna, bettine)\nButter(merna, petrina)\nButter(merna, lawton)\nScamp(lawton, petrina)\nforall x (Cuss(x, bettine) -> Cuss(bettine, petrina))\nforall x (Cuss(x, bettine) -> Hatted(x))\nScamp(merna, petrina) and Hatted(merna) -> Overall(petrina)\nforall x (Hatted(x) and Scamp(x, lawton) -> Scamp(x, bettine))\nforall x (Cuss(x, merna) -> not Scamp(merna, petrina))\nOverall(lawton) -> Cuss(lawton, petrina)\nReticular(petrina) and not Pedantic(petrina) -> Scamp(petrina, merna)\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Miniscule(x))\n\nnot Hatted(petrina)\n\nCuss(petrina, bettine) and forall x (Cuss(x, bettine) -> Hatted(x)) -> therefore Hatted(petrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The del vitriol the harlie. The austine is not earnest. The austine shoplift the anders. The austine trickle the del. The austine vitriol the del. The harlie does not like the anders. The harlie does not visit the del. The harlie vitriol the austine. The harlie vitriol the anders. The anders shoplift the austine. If someone trickle the del then the del trickle the austine. If someone trickle the del then they are ungusseted. If the harlie shoplift the austine and the harlie is ungusseted then the austine is mythic. If someone is ungusseted and they like the anders then they like the del. If someone trickle the harlie then the harlie does not like the austine. If the anders is mythic then the anders trickle the austine. If the austine is earnest and the austine is not aeriferous then the austine shoplift the harlie. All aeriferous people are ossiferous. The austine shoplift the del.", "logic": "\nVitriol(del, harlie)\nnot Earnest(austine)\nShoplift(austine, anders)\nTrickle(austine, del)\nVitriol(austine, del)\nnot Shoplift(harlie, anders)\nnot Vitriol(harlie, del)\nVitriol(harlie, austine)\nVitriol(harlie, anders)\nShoplift(anders, austine)\nforall x (Trickle(x, del) -> Trickle(del, austine))\nforall x (Trickle(x, del) -> Ungusseted(x))\nShoplift(harlie, austine) and Ungusseted(harlie) -> Mythic(austine)\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and Shoplift(x, anders) -> Shoplift(x, del))\nforall x (Trickle(x, harlie) -> not Shoplift(harlie, austine))\nMythic(anders) -> Trickle(anders, austine)\nEarnest(austine) and not Aeriferous(austine) -> Shoplift(austine, harlie)\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) -> Ossiferous(x))\n\nShoplift(austine, del)\n\nTrickle(austine, del) and forall x (Trickle(x, del) -> Ungusseted(x)) -> therefore Ungusseted(austine) Ungusseted(austine) and Shoplift(austine, anders) and forall x (Ungusseted(x) and Shoplift(x, anders) -> Shoplift(x, del)) -> therefore Shoplift(austine, del)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The maribel foredate the pauly. The jeromy is not reverse. The jeromy pluralize the jeanne. The jeromy pick the maribel. The jeromy foredate the maribel. The pauly does not like the jeanne. The pauly does not visit the maribel. The pauly foredate the jeromy. The pauly foredate the jeanne. The jeanne pluralize the jeromy. If someone pick the maribel then the maribel pick the jeromy. If someone pick the maribel then they are gorgeous. If the pauly pluralize the jeromy and the pauly is gorgeous then the jeromy is cautious. If someone is gorgeous and they like the jeanne then they like the maribel. If someone pick the pauly then the pauly does not like the jeromy. If the jeanne is cautious then the jeanne pick the jeromy. If the jeromy is reverse and the jeromy is not queenlike then the jeromy pluralize the pauly. All queenlike people are expiable. The jeromy does not like the maribel.", "logic": "\nForedate(maribel, pauly)\nnot Reverse(jeromy)\nPluralize(jeromy, jeanne)\nPick(jeromy, maribel)\nForedate(jeromy, maribel)\nnot Pluralize(pauly, jeanne)\nnot Foredate(pauly, maribel)\nForedate(pauly, jeromy)\nForedate(pauly, jeanne)\nPluralize(jeanne, jeromy)\nforall x (Pick(x, maribel) -> Pick(maribel, jeromy))\nforall x (Pick(x, maribel) -> Gorgeous(x))\nPluralize(pauly, jeromy) and Gorgeous(pauly) -> Cautious(jeromy)\nforall x (Gorgeous(x) and Pluralize(x, jeanne) -> Pluralize(x, maribel))\nforall x (Pick(x, pauly) -> not Pluralize(pauly, jeromy))\nCautious(jeanne) -> Pick(jeanne, jeromy)\nReverse(jeromy) and not Queenlike(jeromy) -> Pluralize(jeromy, pauly)\nforall x (Queenlike(x) -> Expiable(x))\n\nnot Pluralize(jeromy, maribel)\n\nPick(jeromy, maribel) and forall x (Pick(x, maribel) -> Gorgeous(x)) -> therefore Gorgeous(jeromy) Gorgeous(jeromy) and Pluralize(jeromy, jeanne) and forall x (Gorgeous(x) and Pluralize(x, jeanne) -> Pluralize(x, maribel)) -> therefore Pluralize(jeromy, maribel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The eddy schnorr the darrick. The charleen is not decided. The charleen pacify the remington. The charleen betray the eddy. The charleen schnorr the eddy. The darrick does not like the remington. The darrick does not visit the eddy. The darrick schnorr the charleen. The darrick schnorr the remington. The remington pacify the charleen. If someone betray the eddy then the eddy betray the charleen. If someone betray the eddy then they are serous. If the darrick pacify the charleen and the darrick is serous then the charleen is spoken. If someone is serous and they like the remington then they like the eddy. If someone betray the darrick then the darrick does not like the charleen. If the remington is spoken then the remington betray the charleen. If the charleen is decided and the charleen is not volar then the charleen pacify the darrick. All volar people are unhewn. The remington does not like the eddy.", "logic": "\nSchnorr(eddy, darrick)\nnot Decided(charleen)\nPacify(charleen, remington)\nBetray(charleen, eddy)\nSchnorr(charleen, eddy)\nnot Pacify(darrick, remington)\nnot Schnorr(darrick, eddy)\nSchnorr(darrick, charleen)\nSchnorr(darrick, remington)\nPacify(remington, charleen)\nforall x (Betray(x, eddy) -> Betray(eddy, charleen))\nforall x (Betray(x, eddy) -> Serous(x))\nPacify(darrick, charleen) and Serous(darrick) -> Spoken(charleen)\nforall x (Serous(x) and Pacify(x, remington) -> Pacify(x, eddy))\nforall x (Betray(x, darrick) -> not Pacify(darrick, charleen))\nSpoken(remington) -> Betray(remington, charleen)\nDecided(charleen) and not Volar(charleen) -> Pacify(charleen, darrick)\nforall x (Volar(x) -> Unhewn(x))\n\nnot Pacify(remington, eddy)\n\nforall x (Serous(x) and Pacify(x, remington) -> Pacify(x, eddy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The marni jeopardise the vida. The dallas is not unaccented. The dallas rabbit the collette. The dallas crochet the marni. The dallas jeopardise the marni. The vida does not like the collette. The vida does not visit the marni. The vida jeopardise the dallas. The vida jeopardise the collette. The collette rabbit the dallas. If someone crochet the marni then the marni crochet the dallas. If someone crochet the marni then they are neuronic. If the vida rabbit the dallas and the vida is neuronic then the dallas is nonviable. If someone is neuronic and they like the collette then they like the marni. If someone crochet the vida then the vida does not like the dallas. If the collette is nonviable then the collette crochet the dallas. If the dallas is unaccented and the dallas is not pedantic then the dallas rabbit the vida. All pedantic people are euphonic. The dallas is euphonic.", "logic": "\nJeopardise(marni, vida)\nnot Unaccented(dallas)\nRabbit(dallas, collette)\nCrochet(dallas, marni)\nJeopardise(dallas, marni)\nnot Rabbit(vida, collette)\nnot Jeopardise(vida, marni)\nJeopardise(vida, dallas)\nJeopardise(vida, collette)\nRabbit(collette, dallas)\nforall x (Crochet(x, marni) -> Crochet(marni, dallas))\nforall x (Crochet(x, marni) -> Neuronic(x))\nRabbit(vida, dallas) and Neuronic(vida) -> Nonviable(dallas)\nforall x (Neuronic(x) and Rabbit(x, collette) -> Rabbit(x, marni))\nforall x (Crochet(x, vida) -> not Rabbit(vida, dallas))\nNonviable(collette) -> Crochet(collette, dallas)\nUnaccented(dallas) and not Pedantic(dallas) -> Rabbit(dallas, vida)\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Euphonic(x))\n\nEuphonic(dallas)\n\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Euphonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The andrey reprize the marty. The kati is not venetian. The kati jockey the edwina. The kati hymn the andrey. The kati reprize the andrey. The marty does not like the edwina. The marty does not visit the andrey. The marty reprize the kati. The marty reprize the edwina. The edwina jockey the kati. If someone hymn the andrey then the andrey hymn the kati. If someone hymn the andrey then they are asyndetic. If the marty jockey the kati and the marty is asyndetic then the kati is tweedy. If someone is asyndetic and they like the edwina then they like the andrey. If someone hymn the marty then the marty does not like the kati. If the edwina is tweedy then the edwina hymn the kati. If the kati is venetian and the kati is not bolshevist then the kati jockey the marty. All bolshevist people are unfertile. The marty is not unfertile.", "logic": "\nReprize(andrey, marty)\nnot Venetian(kati)\nJockey(kati, edwina)\nHymn(kati, andrey)\nReprize(kati, andrey)\nnot Jockey(marty, edwina)\nnot Reprize(marty, andrey)\nReprize(marty, kati)\nReprize(marty, edwina)\nJockey(edwina, kati)\nforall x (Hymn(x, andrey) -> Hymn(andrey, kati))\nforall x (Hymn(x, andrey) -> Asyndetic(x))\nJockey(marty, kati) and Asyndetic(marty) -> Tweedy(kati)\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) and Jockey(x, edwina) -> Jockey(x, andrey))\nforall x (Hymn(x, marty) -> not Jockey(marty, kati))\nTweedy(edwina) -> Hymn(edwina, kati)\nVenetian(kati) and not Bolshevist(kati) -> Jockey(kati, marty)\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Unfertile(x))\n\nnot Unfertile(marty)\n\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Unfertile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The madella keratinise the shaylynn. The olympe is not uninsured. The olympe recombine the hinda. The olympe inhibit the madella. The olympe keratinise the madella. The shaylynn does not like the hinda. The shaylynn does not visit the madella. The shaylynn keratinise the olympe. The shaylynn keratinise the hinda. The hinda recombine the olympe. If someone inhibit the madella then the madella inhibit the olympe. If someone inhibit the madella then they are chaldee. If the shaylynn recombine the olympe and the shaylynn is chaldee then the olympe is somnolent. If someone is chaldee and they like the hinda then they like the madella. If someone inhibit the shaylynn then the shaylynn does not like the olympe. If the hinda is somnolent then the hinda inhibit the olympe. If the olympe is uninsured and the olympe is not schizoid then the olympe recombine the shaylynn. All schizoid people are chemical. The olympe is schizoid.", "logic": "\nKeratinise(madella, shaylynn)\nnot Uninsured(olympe)\nRecombine(olympe, hinda)\nInhibit(olympe, madella)\nKeratinise(olympe, madella)\nnot Recombine(shaylynn, hinda)\nnot Keratinise(shaylynn, madella)\nKeratinise(shaylynn, olympe)\nKeratinise(shaylynn, hinda)\nRecombine(hinda, olympe)\nforall x (Inhibit(x, madella) -> Inhibit(madella, olympe))\nforall x (Inhibit(x, madella) -> Chaldee(x))\nRecombine(shaylynn, olympe) and Chaldee(shaylynn) -> Somnolent(olympe)\nforall x (Chaldee(x) and Recombine(x, hinda) -> Recombine(x, madella))\nforall x (Inhibit(x, shaylynn) -> not Recombine(shaylynn, olympe))\nSomnolent(hinda) -> Inhibit(hinda, olympe)\nUninsured(olympe) and not Schizoid(olympe) -> Recombine(olympe, shaylynn)\nforall x (Schizoid(x) -> Chemical(x))\n\nSchizoid(olympe)\n\nSchizoid(olympe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The xerxes assert the malka. The cortney is not chivalric. The cortney rebuff the poppy. The cortney wrawl the xerxes. The cortney assert the xerxes. The malka does not like the poppy. The malka does not visit the xerxes. The malka assert the cortney. The malka assert the poppy. The poppy rebuff the cortney. If someone wrawl the xerxes then the xerxes wrawl the cortney. If someone wrawl the xerxes then they are bearded. If the malka rebuff the cortney and the malka is bearded then the cortney is spherical. If someone is bearded and they like the poppy then they like the xerxes. If someone wrawl the malka then the malka does not like the cortney. If the poppy is spherical then the poppy wrawl the cortney. If the cortney is chivalric and the cortney is not wimpish then the cortney rebuff the malka. All wimpish people are authentic. The cortney does not visit the malka.", "logic": "\nAssert(xerxes, malka)\nnot Chivalric(cortney)\nRebuff(cortney, poppy)\nWrawl(cortney, xerxes)\nAssert(cortney, xerxes)\nnot Rebuff(malka, poppy)\nnot Assert(malka, xerxes)\nAssert(malka, cortney)\nAssert(malka, poppy)\nRebuff(poppy, cortney)\nforall x (Wrawl(x, xerxes) -> Wrawl(xerxes, cortney))\nforall x (Wrawl(x, xerxes) -> Bearded(x))\nRebuff(malka, cortney) and Bearded(malka) -> Spherical(cortney)\nforall x (Bearded(x) and Rebuff(x, poppy) -> Rebuff(x, xerxes))\nforall x (Wrawl(x, malka) -> not Rebuff(malka, cortney))\nSpherical(poppy) -> Wrawl(poppy, cortney)\nChivalric(cortney) and not Wimpish(cortney) -> Rebuff(cortney, malka)\nforall x (Wimpish(x) -> Authentic(x))\n\nnot Assert(cortney, malka)\n\nnot Assert(cortney, malka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The virgina misuse the nicolette. The carita is not segregated. The carita herd the nicky. The carita review the virgina. The carita misuse the virgina. The nicolette does not like the nicky. The nicolette does not visit the virgina. The nicolette misuse the carita. The nicolette misuse the nicky. The nicky herd the carita. If someone review the virgina then the virgina review the carita. If someone review the virgina then they are shrewd. If the nicolette herd the carita and the nicolette is shrewd then the carita is braised. If someone is shrewd and they like the nicky then they like the virgina. If someone review the nicolette then the nicolette does not like the carita. If the nicky is braised then the nicky review the carita. If the carita is segregated and the carita is not underslung then the carita herd the nicolette. All underslung people are keen. The nicky herd the nicolette.", "logic": "\nMisuse(virgina, nicolette)\nnot Segregated(carita)\nHerd(carita, nicky)\nReview(carita, virgina)\nMisuse(carita, virgina)\nnot Herd(nicolette, nicky)\nnot Misuse(nicolette, virgina)\nMisuse(nicolette, carita)\nMisuse(nicolette, nicky)\nHerd(nicky, carita)\nforall x (Review(x, virgina) -> Review(virgina, carita))\nforall x (Review(x, virgina) -> Shrewd(x))\nHerd(nicolette, carita) and Shrewd(nicolette) -> Braised(carita)\nforall x (Shrewd(x) and Herd(x, nicky) -> Herd(x, virgina))\nforall x (Review(x, nicolette) -> not Herd(nicolette, carita))\nBraised(nicky) -> Review(nicky, carita)\nSegregated(carita) and not Underslung(carita) -> Herd(carita, nicolette)\nforall x (Underslung(x) -> Keen(x))\n\nHerd(nicky, nicolette)\n\nHerd(nicky, nicolette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-465"} {"premises": "The elsbeth blether the shay. The ermina adjure the katharine. The shay misaddress the katharine. The katharine is pious. If someone is pious then they like the ermina. If someone is untoothed and they visit the katharine then the katharine adjure the shay. If the katharine adjure the shay and the shay misaddress the katharine then the shay blether the katharine. If someone is subjacent and they visit the katharine then the katharine adjure the elsbeth. If someone misaddress the ermina then the ermina adjure the elsbeth. If someone blether the shay then they are subjacent. The ermina adjure the katharine.", "logic": "\nBlether(elsbeth, shay)\nAdjure(ermina, katharine)\nMisaddress(shay, katharine)\nPious(katharine)\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Misaddress(x, ermina))\nforall x (Untoothed(x) and Blether(x, katharine) -> Adjure(katharine, shay))\nAdjure(katharine, shay) and Misaddress(shay, katharine) -> Blether(shay, katharine)\nforall x (Subjacent(x) and Blether(x, katharine) -> Adjure(katharine, elsbeth))\nforall x (Misaddress(x, ermina) -> Adjure(ermina, elsbeth))\nforall x (Blether(x, shay) -> Subjacent(x))\n\nAdjure(ermina, katharine)\n\ntherefore Adjure(ermina, katharine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The darcee seesaw the cameo. The trev article the alida. The cameo execrate the alida. The alida is squint. If someone is squint then they like the trev. If someone is clonic and they visit the alida then the alida article the cameo. If the alida article the cameo and the cameo execrate the alida then the cameo seesaw the alida. If someone is assistant and they visit the alida then the alida article the darcee. If someone execrate the trev then the trev article the darcee. If someone seesaw the cameo then they are assistant. The trev does not need the alida.", "logic": "\nSeesaw(darcee, cameo)\nArticle(trev, alida)\nExecrate(cameo, alida)\nSquint(alida)\nforall x (Squint(x) -> Execrate(x, trev))\nforall x (Clonic(x) and Seesaw(x, alida) -> Article(alida, cameo))\nArticle(alida, cameo) and Execrate(cameo, alida) -> Seesaw(cameo, alida)\nforall x (Assistant(x) and Seesaw(x, alida) -> Article(alida, darcee))\nforall x (Execrate(x, trev) -> Article(trev, darcee))\nforall x (Seesaw(x, cameo) -> Assistant(x))\n\nnot Article(trev, alida)\n\ntherefore Article(trev, alida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The hildy monkey the mack. The jeni flee the tarrah. The mack offload the tarrah. The tarrah is brief. If someone is brief then they like the jeni. If someone is adoptable and they visit the tarrah then the tarrah flee the mack. If the tarrah flee the mack and the mack offload the tarrah then the mack monkey the tarrah. If someone is uninjured and they visit the tarrah then the tarrah flee the hildy. If someone offload the jeni then the jeni flee the hildy. If someone monkey the mack then they are uninjured. The hildy is uninjured.", "logic": "\nMonkey(hildy, mack)\nFlee(jeni, tarrah)\nOffload(mack, tarrah)\nBrief(tarrah)\nforall x (Brief(x) -> Offload(x, jeni))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) and Monkey(x, tarrah) -> Flee(tarrah, mack))\nFlee(tarrah, mack) and Offload(mack, tarrah) -> Monkey(mack, tarrah)\nforall x (Uninjured(x) and Monkey(x, tarrah) -> Flee(tarrah, hildy))\nforall x (Offload(x, jeni) -> Flee(jeni, hildy))\nforall x (Monkey(x, mack) -> Uninjured(x))\n\nUninjured(hildy)\n\nMonkey(hildy, mack) and forall x (Monkey(x, mack) -> Uninjured(x)) -> therefore Uninjured(hildy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The chad rally the anselm. The mick control the melva. The anselm incense the melva. The melva is conformist. If someone is conformist then they like the mick. If someone is clustered and they visit the melva then the melva control the anselm. If the melva control the anselm and the anselm incense the melva then the anselm rally the melva. If someone is faux and they visit the melva then the melva control the chad. If someone incense the mick then the mick control the chad. If someone rally the anselm then they are faux. The melva does not like the mick.", "logic": "\nRally(chad, anselm)\nControl(mick, melva)\nIncense(anselm, melva)\nConformist(melva)\nforall x (Conformist(x) -> Incense(x, mick))\nforall x (Clustered(x) and Rally(x, melva) -> Control(melva, anselm))\nControl(melva, anselm) and Incense(anselm, melva) -> Rally(anselm, melva)\nforall x (Faux(x) and Rally(x, melva) -> Control(melva, chad))\nforall x (Incense(x, mick) -> Control(mick, chad))\nforall x (Rally(x, anselm) -> Faux(x))\n\nnot Incense(melva, mick)\n\nConformist(melva) and forall x (Conformist(x) -> Incense(x, mick)) -> therefore Incense(melva, mick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The tadd squirm the wilbert. The dacie toughen the wandis. The wilbert wring the wandis. The wandis is graceful. If someone is graceful then they like the dacie. If someone is unsecured and they visit the wandis then the wandis toughen the wilbert. If the wandis toughen the wilbert and the wilbert wring the wandis then the wilbert squirm the wandis. If someone is clunky and they visit the wandis then the wandis toughen the tadd. If someone wring the dacie then the dacie toughen the tadd. If someone squirm the wilbert then they are clunky. The dacie toughen the tadd.", "logic": "\nSquirm(tadd, wilbert)\nToughen(dacie, wandis)\nWring(wilbert, wandis)\nGraceful(wandis)\nforall x (Graceful(x) -> Wring(x, dacie))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) and Squirm(x, wandis) -> Toughen(wandis, wilbert))\nToughen(wandis, wilbert) and Wring(wilbert, wandis) -> Squirm(wilbert, wandis)\nforall x (Clunky(x) and Squirm(x, wandis) -> Toughen(wandis, tadd))\nforall x (Wring(x, dacie) -> Toughen(dacie, tadd))\nforall x (Squirm(x, wilbert) -> Clunky(x))\n\nToughen(dacie, tadd)\n\nGraceful(wandis) and forall x (Graceful(x) -> Wring(x, dacie)) -> therefore Wring(wandis, dacie) Wring(wandis, dacie) and forall x (Wring(x, dacie) -> Toughen(dacie, tadd)) -> therefore Toughen(dacie, tadd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The eula sour the joanne. The judy interpose the darth. The joanne jangle the darth. The darth is petulant. If someone is petulant then they like the judy. If someone is defamatory and they visit the darth then the darth interpose the joanne. If the darth interpose the joanne and the joanne jangle the darth then the joanne sour the darth. If someone is geared and they visit the darth then the darth interpose the eula. If someone jangle the judy then the judy interpose the eula. If someone sour the joanne then they are geared. The judy does not need the eula.", "logic": "\nSour(eula, joanne)\nInterpose(judy, darth)\nJangle(joanne, darth)\nPetulant(darth)\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Jangle(x, judy))\nforall x (Defamatory(x) and Sour(x, darth) -> Interpose(darth, joanne))\nInterpose(darth, joanne) and Jangle(joanne, darth) -> Sour(joanne, darth)\nforall x (Geared(x) and Sour(x, darth) -> Interpose(darth, eula))\nforall x (Jangle(x, judy) -> Interpose(judy, eula))\nforall x (Sour(x, joanne) -> Geared(x))\n\nnot Interpose(judy, eula)\n\nPetulant(darth) and forall x (Petulant(x) -> Jangle(x, judy)) -> therefore Jangle(darth, judy) Jangle(darth, judy) and forall x (Jangle(x, judy) -> Interpose(judy, eula)) -> therefore Interpose(judy, eula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The ethan wheedle the geoff. The abdel waterproof the noami. The geoff famish the noami. The noami is appeasing. If someone is appeasing then they like the abdel. If someone is washable and they visit the noami then the noami waterproof the geoff. If the noami waterproof the geoff and the geoff famish the noami then the geoff wheedle the noami. If someone is ungummed and they visit the noami then the noami waterproof the ethan. If someone famish the abdel then the abdel waterproof the ethan. If someone wheedle the geoff then they are ungummed. The noami is not ungummed.", "logic": "\nWheedle(ethan, geoff)\nWaterproof(abdel, noami)\nFamish(geoff, noami)\nAppeasing(noami)\nforall x (Appeasing(x) -> Famish(x, abdel))\nforall x (Washable(x) and Wheedle(x, noami) -> Waterproof(noami, geoff))\nWaterproof(noami, geoff) and Famish(geoff, noami) -> Wheedle(geoff, noami)\nforall x (Ungummed(x) and Wheedle(x, noami) -> Waterproof(noami, ethan))\nforall x (Famish(x, abdel) -> Waterproof(abdel, ethan))\nforall x (Wheedle(x, geoff) -> Ungummed(x))\n\nnot Ungummed(noami)\n\nforall x (Wheedle(x, geoff) -> Ungummed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The boris recycle the corky. The sharla enable the regen. The corky colourize the regen. The regen is lowest. If someone is lowest then they like the sharla. If someone is germanic and they visit the regen then the regen enable the corky. If the regen enable the corky and the corky colourize the regen then the corky recycle the regen. If someone is energizing and they visit the regen then the regen enable the boris. If someone colourize the sharla then the sharla enable the boris. If someone recycle the corky then they are energizing. The corky recycle the regen.", "logic": "\nRecycle(boris, corky)\nEnable(sharla, regen)\nColourize(corky, regen)\nLowest(regen)\nforall x (Lowest(x) -> Colourize(x, sharla))\nforall x (Germanic(x) and Recycle(x, regen) -> Enable(regen, corky))\nEnable(regen, corky) and Colourize(corky, regen) -> Recycle(corky, regen)\nforall x (Energizing(x) and Recycle(x, regen) -> Enable(regen, boris))\nforall x (Colourize(x, sharla) -> Enable(sharla, boris))\nforall x (Recycle(x, corky) -> Energizing(x))\n\nRecycle(corky, regen)\n\nEnable(regen, corky) and Colourize(corky, regen) -> Recycle(corky, regen) <- forall x (Germanic(x) and Recycle(x, regen) -> Enable(regen, corky)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The lela gauge the salem. The carolan bedaub the junina. The salem flay the junina. The junina is discontent. If someone is discontent then they like the carolan. If someone is unsung and they visit the junina then the junina bedaub the salem. If the junina bedaub the salem and the salem flay the junina then the salem gauge the junina. If someone is augitic and they visit the junina then the junina bedaub the lela. If someone flay the carolan then the carolan bedaub the lela. If someone gauge the salem then they are augitic. The carolan is not augitic.", "logic": "\nGauge(lela, salem)\nBedaub(carolan, junina)\nFlay(salem, junina)\nDiscontent(junina)\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Flay(x, carolan))\nforall x (Unsung(x) and Gauge(x, junina) -> Bedaub(junina, salem))\nBedaub(junina, salem) and Flay(salem, junina) -> Gauge(salem, junina)\nforall x (Augitic(x) and Gauge(x, junina) -> Bedaub(junina, lela))\nforall x (Flay(x, carolan) -> Bedaub(carolan, lela))\nforall x (Gauge(x, salem) -> Augitic(x))\n\nnot Augitic(carolan)\n\nforall x (Gauge(x, salem) -> Augitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The rubie descry the adriana. The tanney splay the valery. The adriana enshrine the valery. The valery is faraway. If someone is faraway then they like the tanney. If someone is malted and they visit the valery then the valery splay the adriana. If the valery splay the adriana and the adriana enshrine the valery then the adriana descry the valery. If someone is indian and they visit the valery then the valery splay the rubie. If someone enshrine the tanney then the tanney splay the rubie. If someone descry the adriana then they are indian. The valery descry the adriana.", "logic": "\nDescry(rubie, adriana)\nSplay(tanney, valery)\nEnshrine(adriana, valery)\nFaraway(valery)\nforall x (Faraway(x) -> Enshrine(x, tanney))\nforall x (Malted(x) and Descry(x, valery) -> Splay(valery, adriana))\nSplay(valery, adriana) and Enshrine(adriana, valery) -> Descry(adriana, valery)\nforall x (Indian(x) and Descry(x, valery) -> Splay(valery, rubie))\nforall x (Enshrine(x, tanney) -> Splay(tanney, rubie))\nforall x (Descry(x, adriana) -> Indian(x))\n\nDescry(valery, adriana)\n\nDescry(valery, adriana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The nathan refract the marleen. The mariellen macrame the arly. The marleen shoetree the arly. The arly is punctual. If someone is punctual then they like the mariellen. If someone is piquant and they visit the arly then the arly macrame the marleen. If the arly macrame the marleen and the marleen shoetree the arly then the marleen refract the arly. If someone is papillate and they visit the arly then the arly macrame the nathan. If someone shoetree the mariellen then the mariellen macrame the nathan. If someone refract the marleen then they are papillate. The nathan does not need the nathan.", "logic": "\nRefract(nathan, marleen)\nMacrame(mariellen, arly)\nShoetree(marleen, arly)\nPunctual(arly)\nforall x (Punctual(x) -> Shoetree(x, mariellen))\nforall x (Piquant(x) and Refract(x, arly) -> Macrame(arly, marleen))\nMacrame(arly, marleen) and Shoetree(marleen, arly) -> Refract(marleen, arly)\nforall x (Papillate(x) and Refract(x, arly) -> Macrame(arly, nathan))\nforall x (Shoetree(x, mariellen) -> Macrame(mariellen, nathan))\nforall x (Refract(x, marleen) -> Papillate(x))\n\nnot Macrame(nathan, nathan)\n\nnot Macrame(nathan, nathan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The odette glimpse the cristy. The anthia reconfirm the coralyn. The cristy vocalize the coralyn. The coralyn is squawky. If someone is squawky then they like the anthia. If someone is planar and they visit the coralyn then the coralyn reconfirm the cristy. If the coralyn reconfirm the cristy and the cristy vocalize the coralyn then the cristy glimpse the coralyn. If someone is smelling and they visit the coralyn then the coralyn reconfirm the odette. If someone vocalize the anthia then the anthia reconfirm the odette. If someone glimpse the cristy then they are smelling. The coralyn reconfirm the anthia.", "logic": "\nGlimpse(odette, cristy)\nReconfirm(anthia, coralyn)\nVocalize(cristy, coralyn)\nSquawky(coralyn)\nforall x (Squawky(x) -> Vocalize(x, anthia))\nforall x (Planar(x) and Glimpse(x, coralyn) -> Reconfirm(coralyn, cristy))\nReconfirm(coralyn, cristy) and Vocalize(cristy, coralyn) -> Glimpse(cristy, coralyn)\nforall x (Smelling(x) and Glimpse(x, coralyn) -> Reconfirm(coralyn, odette))\nforall x (Vocalize(x, anthia) -> Reconfirm(anthia, odette))\nforall x (Glimpse(x, cristy) -> Smelling(x))\n\nReconfirm(coralyn, anthia)\n\nReconfirm(coralyn, anthia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "Imogen is abridged. Imogen is misbegot. Imogen is not nonionised. Kind people are squab. If Imogen is semitic and Imogen is nonionised then Imogen is bereaved. If someone is misbegot and squab then they are bereaved. Kind, squab people are bereaved. If someone is squab then they are abridged. If Imogen is nonionised then Imogen is not impassable. Cold people are semitic. If Imogen is impassable and Imogen is semitic then Imogen is squab. Imogen is misbegot.", "logic": "\nAbridged(imogen)\nMisbegot(imogen)\nnot Nonionised(imogen)\nforall x (Semitic(x) -> Squab(x))\nSemitic(imogen) and Nonionised(imogen) -> Bereaved(imogen)\nforall x (Misbegot(x) and Squab(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Semitic(x) and Squab(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Abridged(x))\nNonionised(imogen) -> not Impassable(imogen)\nforall x (Misbegot(x) -> Semitic(x))\nImpassable(imogen) and Semitic(imogen) -> Squab(imogen)\n\nMisbegot(imogen)\n\ntherefore Misbegot(imogen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Alameda is potted. Alameda is synoptical. Alameda is not dactylic. Kind people are ranking. If Alameda is algid and Alameda is dactylic then Alameda is lidded. If someone is synoptical and ranking then they are lidded. Kind, ranking people are lidded. If someone is ranking then they are potted. If Alameda is dactylic then Alameda is not emphasised. Cold people are algid. If Alameda is emphasised and Alameda is algid then Alameda is ranking. Alameda is not synoptical.", "logic": "\nPotted(alameda)\nSynoptical(alameda)\nnot Dactylic(alameda)\nforall x (Algid(x) -> Ranking(x))\nAlgid(alameda) and Dactylic(alameda) -> Lidded(alameda)\nforall x (Synoptical(x) and Ranking(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Algid(x) and Ranking(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Ranking(x) -> Potted(x))\nDactylic(alameda) -> not Emphasised(alameda)\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> Algid(x))\nEmphasised(alameda) and Algid(alameda) -> Ranking(alameda)\n\nnot Synoptical(alameda)\n\ntherefore Synoptical(alameda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Darb is needy. Darb is cosmologic. Darb is not living. Kind people are wonderful. If Darb is stylish and Darb is living then Darb is waxing. If someone is cosmologic and wonderful then they are waxing. Kind, wonderful people are waxing. If someone is wonderful then they are needy. If Darb is living then Darb is not intense. Cold people are stylish. If Darb is intense and Darb is stylish then Darb is wonderful. Darb is stylish.", "logic": "\nNeedy(darb)\nCosmologic(darb)\nnot Living(darb)\nforall x (Stylish(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nStylish(darb) and Living(darb) -> Waxing(darb)\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) and Wonderful(x) -> Waxing(x))\nforall x (Stylish(x) and Wonderful(x) -> Waxing(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) -> Needy(x))\nLiving(darb) -> not Intense(darb)\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Stylish(x))\nIntense(darb) and Stylish(darb) -> Wonderful(darb)\n\nStylish(darb)\n\nCosmologic(darb) and forall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Stylish(x)) -> therefore Stylish(darb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Ansley is oafish. Ansley is sequential. Ansley is not fewest. Kind people are loved. If Ansley is antiphonal and Ansley is fewest then Ansley is slithery. If someone is sequential and loved then they are slithery. Kind, loved people are slithery. If someone is loved then they are oafish. If Ansley is fewest then Ansley is not diabolical. Cold people are antiphonal. If Ansley is diabolical and Ansley is antiphonal then Ansley is loved. Ansley is not antiphonal.", "logic": "\nOafish(ansley)\nSequential(ansley)\nnot Fewest(ansley)\nforall x (Antiphonal(x) -> Loved(x))\nAntiphonal(ansley) and Fewest(ansley) -> Slithery(ansley)\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Loved(x) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Antiphonal(x) and Loved(x) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Loved(x) -> Oafish(x))\nFewest(ansley) -> not Diabolical(ansley)\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nDiabolical(ansley) and Antiphonal(ansley) -> Loved(ansley)\n\nnot Antiphonal(ansley)\n\nSequential(ansley) and forall x (Sequential(x) -> Antiphonal(x)) -> therefore Antiphonal(ansley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Chan is hostile. Chan is basilary. Chan is not untuneful. Kind people are automated. If Chan is sisyphean and Chan is untuneful then Chan is lovesome. If someone is basilary and automated then they are lovesome. Kind, automated people are lovesome. If someone is automated then they are hostile. If Chan is untuneful then Chan is not squeaking. Cold people are sisyphean. If Chan is squeaking and Chan is sisyphean then Chan is automated. Chan is automated.", "logic": "\nHostile(chan)\nBasilary(chan)\nnot Untuneful(chan)\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Automated(x))\nSisyphean(chan) and Untuneful(chan) -> Lovesome(chan)\nforall x (Basilary(x) and Automated(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Automated(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Hostile(x))\nUntuneful(chan) -> not Squeaking(chan)\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nSqueaking(chan) and Sisyphean(chan) -> Automated(chan)\n\nAutomated(chan)\n\nBasilary(chan) and forall x (Basilary(x) -> Sisyphean(x)) -> therefore Sisyphean(chan) Sisyphean(chan) and forall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Automated(x)) -> therefore Automated(chan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Daniele is germfree. Daniele is fictive. Daniele is not unmourned. Kind people are forked. If Daniele is missional and Daniele is unmourned then Daniele is lettered. If someone is fictive and forked then they are lettered. Kind, forked people are lettered. If someone is forked then they are germfree. If Daniele is unmourned then Daniele is not guyanese. Cold people are missional. If Daniele is guyanese and Daniele is missional then Daniele is forked. Daniele is not forked.", "logic": "\nGermfree(daniele)\nFictive(daniele)\nnot Unmourned(daniele)\nforall x (Missional(x) -> Forked(x))\nMissional(daniele) and Unmourned(daniele) -> Lettered(daniele)\nforall x (Fictive(x) and Forked(x) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Missional(x) and Forked(x) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Forked(x) -> Germfree(x))\nUnmourned(daniele) -> not Guyanese(daniele)\nforall x (Fictive(x) -> Missional(x))\nGuyanese(daniele) and Missional(daniele) -> Forked(daniele)\n\nnot Forked(daniele)\n\nFictive(daniele) and forall x (Fictive(x) -> Missional(x)) -> therefore Missional(daniele) Missional(daniele) and forall x (Missional(x) -> Forked(x)) -> therefore Forked(daniele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "The baldwin plastinate the elfrida. The baldwin is ampullary. The baldwin is bicolour. The baldwin is bunglesome. The baldwin is ungeared. The baldwin is drastic. The baldwin quail the elfrida. The baldwin fledge the elfrida. The elfrida plastinate the baldwin. The elfrida is bicolour. The elfrida is bunglesome. The elfrida is ungeared. The elfrida is drastic. The elfrida quail the baldwin. The elfrida fledge the baldwin. If the baldwin is ampullary then the baldwin plastinate the elfrida. If someone plastinate the elfrida then the elfrida fledge the baldwin. If someone fledge the elfrida then they chase the elfrida. If someone is ungeared then they visit the elfrida. If someone plastinate the elfrida and the elfrida plastinate the baldwin then the elfrida fledge the baldwin. If someone quail the elfrida then the elfrida plastinate the baldwin. The baldwin is bicolour.", "logic": "\nPlastinate(baldwin, elfrida)\nAmpullary(baldwin)\nBicolour(baldwin)\nBunglesome(baldwin)\nUngeared(baldwin)\nDrastic(baldwin)\nQuail(baldwin, elfrida)\nFledge(baldwin, elfrida)\nPlastinate(elfrida, baldwin)\nBicolour(elfrida)\nBunglesome(elfrida)\nUngeared(elfrida)\nDrastic(elfrida)\nQuail(elfrida, baldwin)\nFledge(elfrida, baldwin)\nAmpullary(baldwin) -> Plastinate(baldwin, elfrida)\nforall x (Plastinate(x, elfrida) -> Fledge(elfrida, baldwin))\nforall x (Fledge(x, elfrida) -> Plastinate(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Ungeared(x) -> Fledge(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Plastinate(x, elfrida) and Plastinate(elfrida, baldwin) -> Fledge(elfrida, baldwin))\nforall x (Quail(x, elfrida) -> Plastinate(elfrida, baldwin))\n\nBicolour(baldwin)\n\ntherefore Bicolour(baldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The kass alternate the grata. The kass is thoriated. The kass is unoriented. The kass is agronomic. The kass is voluntary. The kass is dismal. The kass muzzle the grata. The kass stab the grata. The grata alternate the kass. The grata is unoriented. The grata is agronomic. The grata is voluntary. The grata is dismal. The grata muzzle the kass. The grata stab the kass. If the kass is thoriated then the kass alternate the grata. If someone alternate the grata then the grata stab the kass. If someone stab the grata then they chase the grata. If someone is voluntary then they visit the grata. If someone alternate the grata and the grata alternate the kass then the grata stab the kass. If someone muzzle the grata then the grata alternate the kass. The kass is not voluntary.", "logic": "\nAlternate(kass, grata)\nThoriated(kass)\nUnoriented(kass)\nAgronomic(kass)\nVoluntary(kass)\nDismal(kass)\nMuzzle(kass, grata)\nStab(kass, grata)\nAlternate(grata, kass)\nUnoriented(grata)\nAgronomic(grata)\nVoluntary(grata)\nDismal(grata)\nMuzzle(grata, kass)\nStab(grata, kass)\nThoriated(kass) -> Alternate(kass, grata)\nforall x (Alternate(x, grata) -> Stab(grata, kass))\nforall x (Stab(x, grata) -> Alternate(x, grata))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Stab(x, grata))\nforall x (Alternate(x, grata) and Alternate(grata, kass) -> Stab(grata, kass))\nforall x (Muzzle(x, grata) -> Alternate(grata, kass))\n\nnot Voluntary(kass)\n\ntherefore Voluntary(kass)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The constanta fluster the baird. The constanta is homocyclic. The constanta is successive. The constanta is accursed. The constanta is slatternly. The constanta is locomotor. The constanta rumour the baird. The constanta canonise the baird. The baird fluster the constanta. The baird is successive. The baird is accursed. The baird is slatternly. The baird is locomotor. The baird rumour the constanta. The baird canonise the constanta. If the constanta is homocyclic then the constanta fluster the baird. If someone fluster the baird then the baird canonise the constanta. If someone canonise the baird then they chase the baird. If someone is slatternly then they visit the baird. If someone fluster the baird and the baird fluster the constanta then the baird canonise the constanta. If someone rumour the baird then the baird fluster the constanta. The baird canonise the baird.", "logic": "\nFluster(constanta, baird)\nHomocyclic(constanta)\nSuccessive(constanta)\nAccursed(constanta)\nSlatternly(constanta)\nLocomotor(constanta)\nRumour(constanta, baird)\nCanonise(constanta, baird)\nFluster(baird, constanta)\nSuccessive(baird)\nAccursed(baird)\nSlatternly(baird)\nLocomotor(baird)\nRumour(baird, constanta)\nCanonise(baird, constanta)\nHomocyclic(constanta) -> Fluster(constanta, baird)\nforall x (Fluster(x, baird) -> Canonise(baird, constanta))\nforall x (Canonise(x, baird) -> Fluster(x, baird))\nforall x (Slatternly(x) -> Canonise(x, baird))\nforall x (Fluster(x, baird) and Fluster(baird, constanta) -> Canonise(baird, constanta))\nforall x (Rumour(x, baird) -> Fluster(baird, constanta))\n\nCanonise(baird, baird)\n\nSlatternly(baird) and forall x (Slatternly(x) -> Canonise(x, baird)) -> therefore Canonise(baird, baird)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The guenna louden the magdaia. The guenna is loquacious. The guenna is unaltered. The guenna is above. The guenna is anesthetic. The guenna is dyspneic. The guenna underbid the magdaia. The guenna excel the magdaia. The magdaia louden the guenna. The magdaia is unaltered. The magdaia is above. The magdaia is anesthetic. The magdaia is dyspneic. The magdaia underbid the guenna. The magdaia excel the guenna. If the guenna is loquacious then the guenna louden the magdaia. If someone louden the magdaia then the magdaia excel the guenna. If someone excel the magdaia then they chase the magdaia. If someone is anesthetic then they visit the magdaia. If someone louden the magdaia and the magdaia louden the guenna then the magdaia excel the guenna. If someone underbid the magdaia then the magdaia louden the guenna. The magdaia does not visit the magdaia.", "logic": "\nLouden(guenna, magdaia)\nLoquacious(guenna)\nUnaltered(guenna)\nAbove(guenna)\nAnesthetic(guenna)\nDyspneic(guenna)\nUnderbid(guenna, magdaia)\nExcel(guenna, magdaia)\nLouden(magdaia, guenna)\nUnaltered(magdaia)\nAbove(magdaia)\nAnesthetic(magdaia)\nDyspneic(magdaia)\nUnderbid(magdaia, guenna)\nExcel(magdaia, guenna)\nLoquacious(guenna) -> Louden(guenna, magdaia)\nforall x (Louden(x, magdaia) -> Excel(magdaia, guenna))\nforall x (Excel(x, magdaia) -> Louden(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Excel(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Louden(x, magdaia) and Louden(magdaia, guenna) -> Excel(magdaia, guenna))\nforall x (Underbid(x, magdaia) -> Louden(magdaia, guenna))\n\nnot Excel(magdaia, magdaia)\n\nAnesthetic(magdaia) and forall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Excel(x, magdaia)) -> therefore Excel(magdaia, magdaia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The acacia curse the minnie. The acacia is displeased. The acacia is bivalent. The acacia is narrowed. The acacia is lordless. The acacia is univalent. The acacia proof the minnie. The acacia supervene the minnie. The minnie curse the acacia. The minnie is bivalent. The minnie is narrowed. The minnie is lordless. The minnie is univalent. The minnie proof the acacia. The minnie supervene the acacia. If the acacia is displeased then the acacia curse the minnie. If someone curse the minnie then the minnie supervene the acacia. If someone supervene the minnie then they chase the minnie. If someone is lordless then they visit the minnie. If someone curse the minnie and the minnie curse the acacia then the minnie supervene the acacia. If someone proof the minnie then the minnie curse the acacia. The minnie curse the minnie.", "logic": "\nCurse(acacia, minnie)\nDispleased(acacia)\nBivalent(acacia)\nNarrowed(acacia)\nLordless(acacia)\nUnivalent(acacia)\nProof(acacia, minnie)\nSupervene(acacia, minnie)\nCurse(minnie, acacia)\nBivalent(minnie)\nNarrowed(minnie)\nLordless(minnie)\nUnivalent(minnie)\nProof(minnie, acacia)\nSupervene(minnie, acacia)\nDispleased(acacia) -> Curse(acacia, minnie)\nforall x (Curse(x, minnie) -> Supervene(minnie, acacia))\nforall x (Supervene(x, minnie) -> Curse(x, minnie))\nforall x (Lordless(x) -> Supervene(x, minnie))\nforall x (Curse(x, minnie) and Curse(minnie, acacia) -> Supervene(minnie, acacia))\nforall x (Proof(x, minnie) -> Curse(minnie, acacia))\n\nCurse(minnie, minnie)\n\nLordless(minnie) and forall x (Lordless(x) -> Supervene(x, minnie)) -> therefore Supervene(minnie, minnie) Supervene(minnie, minnie) and forall x (Supervene(x, minnie) -> Curse(x, minnie)) -> therefore Curse(minnie, minnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The edmond detach the gaspar. The edmond is downwind. The edmond is norman. The edmond is candescent. The edmond is melted. The edmond is patriotic. The edmond indurate the gaspar. The edmond snarf the gaspar. The gaspar detach the edmond. The gaspar is norman. The gaspar is candescent. The gaspar is melted. The gaspar is patriotic. The gaspar indurate the edmond. The gaspar snarf the edmond. If the edmond is downwind then the edmond detach the gaspar. If someone detach the gaspar then the gaspar snarf the edmond. If someone snarf the gaspar then they chase the gaspar. If someone is melted then they visit the gaspar. If someone detach the gaspar and the gaspar detach the edmond then the gaspar snarf the edmond. If someone indurate the gaspar then the gaspar detach the edmond. The gaspar does not chase the gaspar.", "logic": "\nDetach(edmond, gaspar)\nDownwind(edmond)\nNorman(edmond)\nCandescent(edmond)\nMelted(edmond)\nPatriotic(edmond)\nIndurate(edmond, gaspar)\nSnarf(edmond, gaspar)\nDetach(gaspar, edmond)\nNorman(gaspar)\nCandescent(gaspar)\nMelted(gaspar)\nPatriotic(gaspar)\nIndurate(gaspar, edmond)\nSnarf(gaspar, edmond)\nDownwind(edmond) -> Detach(edmond, gaspar)\nforall x (Detach(x, gaspar) -> Snarf(gaspar, edmond))\nforall x (Snarf(x, gaspar) -> Detach(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Melted(x) -> Snarf(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Detach(x, gaspar) and Detach(gaspar, edmond) -> Snarf(gaspar, edmond))\nforall x (Indurate(x, gaspar) -> Detach(gaspar, edmond))\n\nnot Detach(gaspar, gaspar)\n\nMelted(gaspar) and forall x (Melted(x) -> Snarf(x, gaspar)) -> therefore Snarf(gaspar, gaspar) Snarf(gaspar, gaspar) and forall x (Snarf(x, gaspar) -> Detach(x, gaspar)) -> therefore Detach(gaspar, gaspar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The yehudit retain the deb. The yehudit is couthie. The yehudit is anchoritic. The yehudit is clinched. The yehudit is antiblack. The yehudit is broiled. The yehudit trundle the deb. The yehudit reface the deb. The deb retain the yehudit. The deb is anchoritic. The deb is clinched. The deb is antiblack. The deb is broiled. The deb trundle the yehudit. The deb reface the yehudit. If the yehudit is couthie then the yehudit retain the deb. If someone retain the deb then the deb reface the yehudit. If someone reface the deb then they chase the deb. If someone is antiblack then they visit the deb. If someone retain the deb and the deb retain the yehudit then the deb reface the yehudit. If someone trundle the deb then the deb retain the yehudit. The yehudit does not like the yehudit.", "logic": "\nRetain(yehudit, deb)\nCouthie(yehudit)\nAnchoritic(yehudit)\nClinched(yehudit)\nAntiblack(yehudit)\nBroiled(yehudit)\nTrundle(yehudit, deb)\nReface(yehudit, deb)\nRetain(deb, yehudit)\nAnchoritic(deb)\nClinched(deb)\nAntiblack(deb)\nBroiled(deb)\nTrundle(deb, yehudit)\nReface(deb, yehudit)\nCouthie(yehudit) -> Retain(yehudit, deb)\nforall x (Retain(x, deb) -> Reface(deb, yehudit))\nforall x (Reface(x, deb) -> Retain(x, deb))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Reface(x, deb))\nforall x (Retain(x, deb) and Retain(deb, yehudit) -> Reface(deb, yehudit))\nforall x (Trundle(x, deb) -> Retain(deb, yehudit))\n\nnot Trundle(yehudit, yehudit)\n\nnot Trundle(yehudit, yehudit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The cary sightsing the honey. The cary is flavourous. The cary is icelandic. The cary is shopworn. The cary is allometric. The cary is heavy. The cary peril the honey. The cary japan the honey. The honey sightsing the cary. The honey is icelandic. The honey is shopworn. The honey is allometric. The honey is heavy. The honey peril the cary. The honey japan the cary. If the cary is flavourous then the cary sightsing the honey. If someone sightsing the honey then the honey japan the cary. If someone japan the honey then they chase the honey. If someone is allometric then they visit the honey. If someone sightsing the honey and the honey sightsing the cary then the honey japan the cary. If someone peril the honey then the honey sightsing the cary. The cary japan the cary.", "logic": "\nSightsing(cary, honey)\nFlavourous(cary)\nIcelandic(cary)\nShopworn(cary)\nAllometric(cary)\nHeavy(cary)\nPeril(cary, honey)\nJapan(cary, honey)\nSightsing(honey, cary)\nIcelandic(honey)\nShopworn(honey)\nAllometric(honey)\nHeavy(honey)\nPeril(honey, cary)\nJapan(honey, cary)\nFlavourous(cary) -> Sightsing(cary, honey)\nforall x (Sightsing(x, honey) -> Japan(honey, cary))\nforall x (Japan(x, honey) -> Sightsing(x, honey))\nforall x (Allometric(x) -> Japan(x, honey))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, honey) and Sightsing(honey, cary) -> Japan(honey, cary))\nforall x (Peril(x, honey) -> Sightsing(honey, cary))\n\nJapan(cary, cary)\n\nJapan(cary, cary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The carlton gallivant the florrie. The carlton is atheist. The carlton is lusterless. The carlton is untrue. The carlton is crossbred. The carlton is degressive. The carlton benumb the florrie. The carlton recoup the florrie. The florrie gallivant the carlton. The florrie is lusterless. The florrie is untrue. The florrie is crossbred. The florrie is degressive. The florrie benumb the carlton. The florrie recoup the carlton. If the carlton is atheist then the carlton gallivant the florrie. If someone gallivant the florrie then the florrie recoup the carlton. If someone recoup the florrie then they chase the florrie. If someone is crossbred then they visit the florrie. If someone gallivant the florrie and the florrie gallivant the carlton then the florrie recoup the carlton. If someone benumb the florrie then the florrie gallivant the carlton. The florrie is not atheist.", "logic": "\nGallivant(carlton, florrie)\nAtheist(carlton)\nLusterless(carlton)\nUntrue(carlton)\nCrossbred(carlton)\nDegressive(carlton)\nBenumb(carlton, florrie)\nRecoup(carlton, florrie)\nGallivant(florrie, carlton)\nLusterless(florrie)\nUntrue(florrie)\nCrossbred(florrie)\nDegressive(florrie)\nBenumb(florrie, carlton)\nRecoup(florrie, carlton)\nAtheist(carlton) -> Gallivant(carlton, florrie)\nforall x (Gallivant(x, florrie) -> Recoup(florrie, carlton))\nforall x (Recoup(x, florrie) -> Gallivant(x, florrie))\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> Recoup(x, florrie))\nforall x (Gallivant(x, florrie) and Gallivant(florrie, carlton) -> Recoup(florrie, carlton))\nforall x (Benumb(x, florrie) -> Gallivant(florrie, carlton))\n\nnot Atheist(florrie)\n\nnot Atheist(florrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The webster tattle the mika. The webster is hardline. The webster is baptismal. The webster is electoral. The webster is hydroxy. The webster is unimagined. The webster highjack the mika. The webster bolshevise the mika. The mika tattle the webster. The mika is baptismal. The mika is electoral. The mika is hydroxy. The mika is unimagined. The mika highjack the webster. The mika bolshevise the webster. If the webster is hardline then the webster tattle the mika. If someone tattle the mika then the mika bolshevise the webster. If someone bolshevise the mika then they chase the mika. If someone is hydroxy then they visit the mika. If someone tattle the mika and the mika tattle the webster then the mika bolshevise the webster. If someone highjack the mika then the mika tattle the webster. The webster tattle the webster.", "logic": "\nTattle(webster, mika)\nHardline(webster)\nBaptismal(webster)\nElectoral(webster)\nHydroxy(webster)\nUnimagined(webster)\nHighjack(webster, mika)\nBolshevise(webster, mika)\nTattle(mika, webster)\nBaptismal(mika)\nElectoral(mika)\nHydroxy(mika)\nUnimagined(mika)\nHighjack(mika, webster)\nBolshevise(mika, webster)\nHardline(webster) -> Tattle(webster, mika)\nforall x (Tattle(x, mika) -> Bolshevise(mika, webster))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, mika) -> Tattle(x, mika))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Bolshevise(x, mika))\nforall x (Tattle(x, mika) and Tattle(mika, webster) -> Bolshevise(mika, webster))\nforall x (Highjack(x, mika) -> Tattle(mika, webster))\n\nTattle(webster, webster)\n\nTattle(webster, webster) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The randolf welcome the andreas. The randolf is mimic. The randolf doff the rosamund. The randolf doff the andreas. The rosamund stud the andreas. The andreas is befouled. The andreas stud the randolf. If someone welcome the rosamund then the rosamund doff the andreas. If someone stud the rosamund then they are adenoid. If someone doff the andreas and they need the randolf then they see the randolf. If someone is gloomful then they need the randolf. If someone welcome the rosamund then they chase the andreas. If someone doff the randolf and they are mimic then the randolf is gloomful. If someone is mimic and they need the andreas then they are gloomful. If someone doff the rosamund and the rosamund stud the andreas then the andreas stud the rosamund. The randolf welcome the andreas.", "logic": "\nWelcome(randolf, andreas)\nMimic(randolf)\nDoff(randolf, rosamund)\nDoff(randolf, andreas)\nStud(rosamund, andreas)\nBefouled(andreas)\nStud(andreas, randolf)\nforall x (Welcome(x, rosamund) -> Doff(rosamund, andreas))\nforall x (Stud(x, rosamund) -> Adenoid(x))\nforall x (Doff(x, andreas) and Stud(x, randolf) -> Doff(x, randolf))\nforall x (Gloomful(x) -> Stud(x, randolf))\nforall x (Welcome(x, rosamund) -> Welcome(x, andreas))\nforall x (Doff(x, randolf) and Mimic(x) -> Gloomful(randolf))\nforall x (Mimic(x) and Stud(x, andreas) -> Gloomful(x))\nforall x (Doff(x, rosamund) and Stud(rosamund, andreas) -> Stud(andreas, rosamund))\n\nWelcome(randolf, andreas)\n\ntherefore Welcome(randolf, andreas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The ashlen housebreak the danit. The ashlen is saleable. The ashlen daydream the julie. The ashlen daydream the danit. The julie acquire the danit. The danit is desiccate. The danit acquire the ashlen. If someone housebreak the julie then the julie daydream the danit. If someone acquire the julie then they are broadnosed. If someone daydream the danit and they need the ashlen then they see the ashlen. If someone is bacillary then they need the ashlen. If someone housebreak the julie then they chase the danit. If someone daydream the ashlen and they are saleable then the ashlen is bacillary. If someone is saleable and they need the danit then they are bacillary. If someone daydream the julie and the julie acquire the danit then the danit acquire the julie. The ashlen does not see the danit.", "logic": "\nHousebreak(ashlen, danit)\nSaleable(ashlen)\nDaydream(ashlen, julie)\nDaydream(ashlen, danit)\nAcquire(julie, danit)\nDesiccate(danit)\nAcquire(danit, ashlen)\nforall x (Housebreak(x, julie) -> Daydream(julie, danit))\nforall x (Acquire(x, julie) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Daydream(x, danit) and Acquire(x, ashlen) -> Daydream(x, ashlen))\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Acquire(x, ashlen))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, julie) -> Housebreak(x, danit))\nforall x (Daydream(x, ashlen) and Saleable(x) -> Bacillary(ashlen))\nforall x (Saleable(x) and Acquire(x, danit) -> Bacillary(x))\nforall x (Daydream(x, julie) and Acquire(julie, danit) -> Acquire(danit, julie))\n\nnot Daydream(ashlen, danit)\n\ntherefore Daydream(ashlen, danit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The nellie swallow the chandra. The nellie is straggling. The nellie womanise the etty. The nellie womanise the chandra. The etty polychrome the chandra. The chandra is bindable. The chandra polychrome the nellie. If someone swallow the etty then the etty womanise the chandra. If someone polychrome the etty then they are nervous. If someone womanise the chandra and they need the nellie then they see the nellie. If someone is lucky then they need the nellie. If someone swallow the etty then they chase the chandra. If someone womanise the nellie and they are straggling then the nellie is lucky. If someone is straggling and they need the chandra then they are lucky. If someone womanise the etty and the etty polychrome the chandra then the chandra polychrome the etty. The chandra polychrome the etty.", "logic": "\nSwallow(nellie, chandra)\nStraggling(nellie)\nWomanise(nellie, etty)\nWomanise(nellie, chandra)\nPolychrome(etty, chandra)\nBindable(chandra)\nPolychrome(chandra, nellie)\nforall x (Swallow(x, etty) -> Womanise(etty, chandra))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, etty) -> Nervous(x))\nforall x (Womanise(x, chandra) and Polychrome(x, nellie) -> Womanise(x, nellie))\nforall x (Lucky(x) -> Polychrome(x, nellie))\nforall x (Swallow(x, etty) -> Swallow(x, chandra))\nforall x (Womanise(x, nellie) and Straggling(x) -> Lucky(nellie))\nforall x (Straggling(x) and Polychrome(x, chandra) -> Lucky(x))\nforall x (Womanise(x, etty) and Polychrome(etty, chandra) -> Polychrome(chandra, etty))\n\nPolychrome(chandra, etty)\n\nWomanise(nellie, etty) and Polychrome(etty, chandra) and forall x (Womanise(x, etty) and Polychrome(etty, chandra) -> Polychrome(chandra, etty)) -> therefore Polychrome(chandra, etty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The enoch resort the anson. The enoch is sanctioned. The enoch imbricate the velvet. The enoch imbricate the anson. The velvet apparel the anson. The anson is yielding. The anson apparel the enoch. If someone resort the velvet then the velvet imbricate the anson. If someone apparel the velvet then they are dogged. If someone imbricate the anson and they need the enoch then they see the enoch. If someone is regretful then they need the enoch. If someone resort the velvet then they chase the anson. If someone imbricate the enoch and they are sanctioned then the enoch is regretful. If someone is sanctioned and they need the anson then they are regretful. If someone imbricate the velvet and the velvet apparel the anson then the anson apparel the velvet. The anson does not need the velvet.", "logic": "\nResort(enoch, anson)\nSanctioned(enoch)\nImbricate(enoch, velvet)\nImbricate(enoch, anson)\nApparel(velvet, anson)\nYielding(anson)\nApparel(anson, enoch)\nforall x (Resort(x, velvet) -> Imbricate(velvet, anson))\nforall x (Apparel(x, velvet) -> Dogged(x))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, anson) and Apparel(x, enoch) -> Imbricate(x, enoch))\nforall x (Regretful(x) -> Apparel(x, enoch))\nforall x (Resort(x, velvet) -> Resort(x, anson))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, enoch) and Sanctioned(x) -> Regretful(enoch))\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) and Apparel(x, anson) -> Regretful(x))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, velvet) and Apparel(velvet, anson) -> Apparel(anson, velvet))\n\nnot Apparel(anson, velvet)\n\nImbricate(enoch, velvet) and Apparel(velvet, anson) and forall x (Imbricate(x, velvet) and Apparel(velvet, anson) -> Apparel(anson, velvet)) -> therefore Apparel(anson, velvet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The ulrich preform the riki. The ulrich is sidearm. The ulrich interlope the agnese. The ulrich interlope the riki. The agnese canalize the riki. The riki is blank. The riki canalize the ulrich. If someone preform the agnese then the agnese interlope the riki. If someone canalize the agnese then they are geodesic. If someone interlope the riki and they need the ulrich then they see the ulrich. If someone is pedal then they need the ulrich. If someone preform the agnese then they chase the riki. If someone interlope the ulrich and they are sidearm then the ulrich is pedal. If someone is sidearm and they need the riki then they are pedal. If someone interlope the agnese and the agnese canalize the riki then the riki canalize the agnese. The riki is geodesic.", "logic": "\nPreform(ulrich, riki)\nSidearm(ulrich)\nInterlope(ulrich, agnese)\nInterlope(ulrich, riki)\nCanalize(agnese, riki)\nBlank(riki)\nCanalize(riki, ulrich)\nforall x (Preform(x, agnese) -> Interlope(agnese, riki))\nforall x (Canalize(x, agnese) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Interlope(x, riki) and Canalize(x, ulrich) -> Interlope(x, ulrich))\nforall x (Pedal(x) -> Canalize(x, ulrich))\nforall x (Preform(x, agnese) -> Preform(x, riki))\nforall x (Interlope(x, ulrich) and Sidearm(x) -> Pedal(ulrich))\nforall x (Sidearm(x) and Canalize(x, riki) -> Pedal(x))\nforall x (Interlope(x, agnese) and Canalize(agnese, riki) -> Canalize(riki, agnese))\n\nGeodesic(riki)\n\nInterlope(ulrich, agnese) and Canalize(agnese, riki) and forall x (Interlope(x, agnese) and Canalize(agnese, riki) -> Canalize(riki, agnese)) -> therefore Canalize(riki, agnese) Canalize(riki, agnese) and forall x (Canalize(x, agnese) -> Geodesic(x)) -> therefore Geodesic(riki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The tybie louden the shanna. The tybie is sociable. The tybie chrome the lottie. The tybie chrome the shanna. The lottie clean the shanna. The shanna is xciii. The shanna clean the tybie. If someone louden the lottie then the lottie chrome the shanna. If someone clean the lottie then they are lifesize. If someone chrome the shanna and they need the tybie then they see the tybie. If someone is yearly then they need the tybie. If someone louden the lottie then they chase the shanna. If someone chrome the tybie and they are sociable then the tybie is yearly. If someone is sociable and they need the shanna then they are yearly. If someone chrome the lottie and the lottie clean the shanna then the shanna clean the lottie. The shanna is not lifesize.", "logic": "\nLouden(tybie, shanna)\nSociable(tybie)\nChrome(tybie, lottie)\nChrome(tybie, shanna)\nClean(lottie, shanna)\nXciii(shanna)\nClean(shanna, tybie)\nforall x (Louden(x, lottie) -> Chrome(lottie, shanna))\nforall x (Clean(x, lottie) -> Lifesize(x))\nforall x (Chrome(x, shanna) and Clean(x, tybie) -> Chrome(x, tybie))\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Clean(x, tybie))\nforall x (Louden(x, lottie) -> Louden(x, shanna))\nforall x (Chrome(x, tybie) and Sociable(x) -> Yearly(tybie))\nforall x (Sociable(x) and Clean(x, shanna) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Chrome(x, lottie) and Clean(lottie, shanna) -> Clean(shanna, lottie))\n\nnot Lifesize(shanna)\n\nChrome(tybie, lottie) and Clean(lottie, shanna) and forall x (Chrome(x, lottie) and Clean(lottie, shanna) -> Clean(shanna, lottie)) -> therefore Clean(shanna, lottie) Clean(shanna, lottie) and forall x (Clean(x, lottie) -> Lifesize(x)) -> therefore Lifesize(shanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The matthus scour the lucienne. The matthus is bearded. The matthus mercerise the rubi. The matthus mercerise the lucienne. The rubi shellac the lucienne. The lucienne is eleventh. The lucienne shellac the matthus. If someone scour the rubi then the rubi mercerise the lucienne. If someone shellac the rubi then they are toothless. If someone mercerise the lucienne and they need the matthus then they see the matthus. If someone is barbadian then they need the matthus. If someone scour the rubi then they chase the lucienne. If someone mercerise the matthus and they are bearded then the matthus is barbadian. If someone is bearded and they need the lucienne then they are barbadian. If someone mercerise the rubi and the rubi shellac the lucienne then the lucienne shellac the rubi. The matthus is not toothless.", "logic": "\nScour(matthus, lucienne)\nBearded(matthus)\nMercerise(matthus, rubi)\nMercerise(matthus, lucienne)\nShellac(rubi, lucienne)\nEleventh(lucienne)\nShellac(lucienne, matthus)\nforall x (Scour(x, rubi) -> Mercerise(rubi, lucienne))\nforall x (Shellac(x, rubi) -> Toothless(x))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, lucienne) and Shellac(x, matthus) -> Mercerise(x, matthus))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) -> Shellac(x, matthus))\nforall x (Scour(x, rubi) -> Scour(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, matthus) and Bearded(x) -> Barbadian(matthus))\nforall x (Bearded(x) and Shellac(x, lucienne) -> Barbadian(x))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, rubi) and Shellac(rubi, lucienne) -> Shellac(lucienne, rubi))\n\nnot Toothless(matthus)\n\nforall x (Shellac(x, rubi) -> Toothless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The pat vituperate the melody. The pat is unuseable. The pat reacquaint the berk. The pat reacquaint the melody. The berk festinate the melody. The melody is cedarn. The melody festinate the pat. If someone vituperate the berk then the berk reacquaint the melody. If someone festinate the berk then they are countless. If someone reacquaint the melody and they need the pat then they see the pat. If someone is solomonic then they need the pat. If someone vituperate the berk then they chase the melody. If someone reacquaint the pat and they are unuseable then the pat is solomonic. If someone is unuseable and they need the melody then they are solomonic. If someone reacquaint the berk and the berk festinate the melody then the melody festinate the berk. The berk festinate the pat.", "logic": "\nVituperate(pat, melody)\nUnuseable(pat)\nReacquaint(pat, berk)\nReacquaint(pat, melody)\nFestinate(berk, melody)\nCedarn(melody)\nFestinate(melody, pat)\nforall x (Vituperate(x, berk) -> Reacquaint(berk, melody))\nforall x (Festinate(x, berk) -> Countless(x))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, melody) and Festinate(x, pat) -> Reacquaint(x, pat))\nforall x (Solomonic(x) -> Festinate(x, pat))\nforall x (Vituperate(x, berk) -> Vituperate(x, melody))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, pat) and Unuseable(x) -> Solomonic(pat))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) and Festinate(x, melody) -> Solomonic(x))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, berk) and Festinate(berk, melody) -> Festinate(melody, berk))\n\nFestinate(berk, pat)\n\nforall x (Solomonic(x) -> Festinate(x, pat)) <- forall x (Unuseable(x) and Festinate(x, melody) -> Solomonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The hershel tickle the shirah. The hershel is thorough. The hershel convey the celina. The hershel convey the shirah. The celina creak the shirah. The shirah is concealing. The shirah creak the hershel. If someone tickle the celina then the celina convey the shirah. If someone creak the celina then they are blustering. If someone convey the shirah and they need the hershel then they see the hershel. If someone is vicennial then they need the hershel. If someone tickle the celina then they chase the shirah. If someone convey the hershel and they are thorough then the hershel is vicennial. If someone is thorough and they need the shirah then they are vicennial. If someone convey the celina and the celina creak the shirah then the shirah creak the celina. The celina does not see the shirah.", "logic": "\nTickle(hershel, shirah)\nThorough(hershel)\nConvey(hershel, celina)\nConvey(hershel, shirah)\nCreak(celina, shirah)\nConcealing(shirah)\nCreak(shirah, hershel)\nforall x (Tickle(x, celina) -> Convey(celina, shirah))\nforall x (Creak(x, celina) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Convey(x, shirah) and Creak(x, hershel) -> Convey(x, hershel))\nforall x (Vicennial(x) -> Creak(x, hershel))\nforall x (Tickle(x, celina) -> Tickle(x, shirah))\nforall x (Convey(x, hershel) and Thorough(x) -> Vicennial(hershel))\nforall x (Thorough(x) and Creak(x, shirah) -> Vicennial(x))\nforall x (Convey(x, celina) and Creak(celina, shirah) -> Creak(shirah, celina))\n\nnot Convey(celina, shirah)\n\nforall x (Tickle(x, celina) -> Convey(celina, shirah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The dieter antique the taylor. The dieter is fenestral. The dieter animalise the alfredo. The dieter animalise the taylor. The alfredo brattle the taylor. The taylor is olivelike. The taylor brattle the dieter. If someone antique the alfredo then the alfredo animalise the taylor. If someone brattle the alfredo then they are stalked. If someone animalise the taylor and they need the dieter then they see the dieter. If someone is categoric then they need the dieter. If someone antique the alfredo then they chase the taylor. If someone animalise the dieter and they are fenestral then the dieter is categoric. If someone is fenestral and they need the taylor then they are categoric. If someone animalise the alfredo and the alfredo brattle the taylor then the taylor brattle the alfredo. The dieter antique the dieter.", "logic": "\nAntique(dieter, taylor)\nFenestral(dieter)\nAnimalise(dieter, alfredo)\nAnimalise(dieter, taylor)\nBrattle(alfredo, taylor)\nOlivelike(taylor)\nBrattle(taylor, dieter)\nforall x (Antique(x, alfredo) -> Animalise(alfredo, taylor))\nforall x (Brattle(x, alfredo) -> Stalked(x))\nforall x (Animalise(x, taylor) and Brattle(x, dieter) -> Animalise(x, dieter))\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Brattle(x, dieter))\nforall x (Antique(x, alfredo) -> Antique(x, taylor))\nforall x (Animalise(x, dieter) and Fenestral(x) -> Categoric(dieter))\nforall x (Fenestral(x) and Brattle(x, taylor) -> Categoric(x))\nforall x (Animalise(x, alfredo) and Brattle(alfredo, taylor) -> Brattle(taylor, alfredo))\n\nAntique(dieter, dieter)\n\nAntique(dieter, dieter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The giorgia fray the rakel. The giorgia is rattling. The giorgia earn the lucila. The giorgia earn the rakel. The lucila blackberry the rakel. The rakel is blistering. The rakel blackberry the giorgia. If someone fray the lucila then the lucila earn the rakel. If someone blackberry the lucila then they are rimy. If someone earn the rakel and they need the giorgia then they see the giorgia. If someone is feigned then they need the giorgia. If someone fray the lucila then they chase the rakel. If someone earn the giorgia and they are rattling then the giorgia is feigned. If someone is rattling and they need the rakel then they are feigned. If someone earn the lucila and the lucila blackberry the rakel then the rakel blackberry the lucila. The rakel does not chase the lucila.", "logic": "\nFray(giorgia, rakel)\nRattling(giorgia)\nEarn(giorgia, lucila)\nEarn(giorgia, rakel)\nBlackberry(lucila, rakel)\nBlistering(rakel)\nBlackberry(rakel, giorgia)\nforall x (Fray(x, lucila) -> Earn(lucila, rakel))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, lucila) -> Rimy(x))\nforall x (Earn(x, rakel) and Blackberry(x, giorgia) -> Earn(x, giorgia))\nforall x (Feigned(x) -> Blackberry(x, giorgia))\nforall x (Fray(x, lucila) -> Fray(x, rakel))\nforall x (Earn(x, giorgia) and Rattling(x) -> Feigned(giorgia))\nforall x (Rattling(x) and Blackberry(x, rakel) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Earn(x, lucila) and Blackberry(lucila, rakel) -> Blackberry(rakel, lucila))\n\nnot Fray(rakel, lucila)\n\nnot Fray(rakel, lucila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The brigida opalise the emanuel. The brigida is pretended. The brigida canonize the sheldon. The brigida canonize the emanuel. The sheldon baptize the emanuel. The emanuel is only. The emanuel baptize the brigida. If someone opalise the sheldon then the sheldon canonize the emanuel. If someone baptize the sheldon then they are linked. If someone canonize the emanuel and they need the brigida then they see the brigida. If someone is bulky then they need the brigida. If someone opalise the sheldon then they chase the emanuel. If someone canonize the brigida and they are pretended then the brigida is bulky. If someone is pretended and they need the emanuel then they are bulky. If someone canonize the sheldon and the sheldon baptize the emanuel then the emanuel baptize the sheldon. The emanuel is pretended.", "logic": "\nOpalise(brigida, emanuel)\nPretended(brigida)\nCanonize(brigida, sheldon)\nCanonize(brigida, emanuel)\nBaptize(sheldon, emanuel)\nOnly(emanuel)\nBaptize(emanuel, brigida)\nforall x (Opalise(x, sheldon) -> Canonize(sheldon, emanuel))\nforall x (Baptize(x, sheldon) -> Linked(x))\nforall x (Canonize(x, emanuel) and Baptize(x, brigida) -> Canonize(x, brigida))\nforall x (Bulky(x) -> Baptize(x, brigida))\nforall x (Opalise(x, sheldon) -> Opalise(x, emanuel))\nforall x (Canonize(x, brigida) and Pretended(x) -> Bulky(brigida))\nforall x (Pretended(x) and Baptize(x, emanuel) -> Bulky(x))\nforall x (Canonize(x, sheldon) and Baptize(sheldon, emanuel) -> Baptize(emanuel, sheldon))\n\nPretended(emanuel)\n\nPretended(emanuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-737"} {"premises": "The charin is sheltered. The wilt camp the charin. If someone camp the wilt then the wilt does not eat the charin. If someone reorient the charin and the charin reverence the wilt then the charin does not eat the wilt. If someone camp the charin then they eat the charin. If someone reorient the wilt then they are patronized. If someone is sheltered then they chase the wilt. If someone is fibrillose and they do not see the wilt then they chase the wilt. The charin is sheltered.", "logic": "\nSheltered(charin)\nCamp(wilt, charin)\nforall x (Camp(x, wilt) -> not Reorient(wilt, charin))\nforall x (Reorient(x, charin) and Reverence(charin, wilt) -> not Reorient(charin, wilt))\nforall x (Camp(x, charin) -> Reorient(x, charin))\nforall x (Reorient(x, wilt) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Sheltered(x) -> Reverence(x, wilt))\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) and not Camp(x, wilt) -> Reverence(x, wilt))\n\nSheltered(charin)\n\ntherefore Sheltered(charin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The abbott is dickey. The madalena thurify the abbott. If someone thurify the madalena then the madalena does not eat the abbott. If someone tailor the abbott and the abbott adore the madalena then the abbott does not eat the madalena. If someone thurify the abbott then they eat the abbott. If someone tailor the madalena then they are riskless. If someone is dickey then they chase the madalena. If someone is nursed and they do not see the madalena then they chase the madalena. The madalena does not see the abbott.", "logic": "\nDickey(abbott)\nThurify(madalena, abbott)\nforall x (Thurify(x, madalena) -> not Tailor(madalena, abbott))\nforall x (Tailor(x, abbott) and Adore(abbott, madalena) -> not Tailor(abbott, madalena))\nforall x (Thurify(x, abbott) -> Tailor(x, abbott))\nforall x (Tailor(x, madalena) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) -> Adore(x, madalena))\nforall x (Nursed(x) and not Thurify(x, madalena) -> Adore(x, madalena))\n\nnot Thurify(madalena, abbott)\n\ntherefore Thurify(madalena, abbott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The thelma is splotched. The jarvis maledict the thelma. If someone maledict the jarvis then the jarvis does not eat the thelma. If someone pitchfork the thelma and the thelma joyride the jarvis then the thelma does not eat the jarvis. If someone maledict the thelma then they eat the thelma. If someone pitchfork the jarvis then they are seljuk. If someone is splotched then they chase the jarvis. If someone is bias and they do not see the jarvis then they chase the jarvis. The jarvis pitchfork the thelma.", "logic": "\nSplotched(thelma)\nMaledict(jarvis, thelma)\nforall x (Maledict(x, jarvis) -> not Pitchfork(jarvis, thelma))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, thelma) and Joyride(thelma, jarvis) -> not Pitchfork(thelma, jarvis))\nforall x (Maledict(x, thelma) -> Pitchfork(x, thelma))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, jarvis) -> Seljuk(x))\nforall x (Splotched(x) -> Joyride(x, jarvis))\nforall x (Bias(x) and not Maledict(x, jarvis) -> Joyride(x, jarvis))\n\nPitchfork(jarvis, thelma)\n\nMaledict(jarvis, thelma) and forall x (Maledict(x, thelma) -> Pitchfork(x, thelma)) -> therefore Pitchfork(jarvis, thelma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The timotheus is temperate. The ana clock the timotheus. If someone clock the ana then the ana does not eat the timotheus. If someone throttle the timotheus and the timotheus occult the ana then the timotheus does not eat the ana. If someone clock the timotheus then they eat the timotheus. If someone throttle the ana then they are wishful. If someone is temperate then they chase the ana. If someone is unaware and they do not see the ana then they chase the ana. The timotheus does not chase the ana.", "logic": "\nTemperate(timotheus)\nClock(ana, timotheus)\nforall x (Clock(x, ana) -> not Throttle(ana, timotheus))\nforall x (Throttle(x, timotheus) and Occult(timotheus, ana) -> not Throttle(timotheus, ana))\nforall x (Clock(x, timotheus) -> Throttle(x, timotheus))\nforall x (Throttle(x, ana) -> Wishful(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Occult(x, ana))\nforall x (Unaware(x) and not Clock(x, ana) -> Occult(x, ana))\n\nnot Occult(timotheus, ana)\n\nTemperate(timotheus) and forall x (Temperate(x) -> Occult(x, ana)) -> therefore Occult(timotheus, ana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The glenine is frilly. The marcel magnify the glenine. If someone magnify the marcel then the marcel does not eat the glenine. If someone dredge the glenine and the glenine scrag the marcel then the glenine does not eat the marcel. If someone magnify the glenine then they eat the glenine. If someone dredge the marcel then they are tomentose. If someone is frilly then they chase the marcel. If someone is carnation and they do not see the marcel then they chase the marcel. The glenine does not eat the marcel.", "logic": "\nFrilly(glenine)\nMagnify(marcel, glenine)\nforall x (Magnify(x, marcel) -> not Dredge(marcel, glenine))\nforall x (Dredge(x, glenine) and Scrag(glenine, marcel) -> not Dredge(glenine, marcel))\nforall x (Magnify(x, glenine) -> Dredge(x, glenine))\nforall x (Dredge(x, marcel) -> Tomentose(x))\nforall x (Frilly(x) -> Scrag(x, marcel))\nforall x (Carnation(x) and not Magnify(x, marcel) -> Scrag(x, marcel))\n\nnot Dredge(glenine, marcel)\n\nMagnify(marcel, glenine) and forall x (Magnify(x, glenine) -> Dredge(x, glenine)) -> therefore Dredge(marcel, glenine) Frilly(glenine) and forall x (Frilly(x) -> Scrag(x, marcel)) -> therefore Scrag(glenine, marcel) Dredge(marcel, glenine) and Scrag(glenine, marcel) and forall x (Dredge(x, glenine) and Scrag(glenine, marcel) -> not Dredge(glenine, marcel)) -> therefore not Dredge(glenine, marcel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The pauletta is tolerable. The derek ingratiate the pauletta. If someone ingratiate the derek then the derek does not eat the pauletta. If someone calculate the pauletta and the pauletta shun the derek then the pauletta does not eat the derek. If someone ingratiate the pauletta then they eat the pauletta. If someone calculate the derek then they are unspent. If someone is tolerable then they chase the derek. If someone is lxvi and they do not see the derek then they chase the derek. The pauletta calculate the derek.", "logic": "\nTolerable(pauletta)\nIngratiate(derek, pauletta)\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, derek) -> not Calculate(derek, pauletta))\nforall x (Calculate(x, pauletta) and Shun(pauletta, derek) -> not Calculate(pauletta, derek))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, pauletta) -> Calculate(x, pauletta))\nforall x (Calculate(x, derek) -> Unspent(x))\nforall x (Tolerable(x) -> Shun(x, derek))\nforall x (Lxvi(x) and not Ingratiate(x, derek) -> Shun(x, derek))\n\nCalculate(pauletta, derek)\n\nIngratiate(derek, pauletta) and forall x (Ingratiate(x, pauletta) -> Calculate(x, pauletta)) -> therefore Calculate(derek, pauletta) Tolerable(pauletta) and forall x (Tolerable(x) -> Shun(x, derek)) -> therefore Shun(pauletta, derek) Calculate(derek, pauletta) and Shun(pauletta, derek) and forall x (Calculate(x, pauletta) and Shun(pauletta, derek) -> not Calculate(pauletta, derek)) -> therefore not Calculate(pauletta, derek)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The egbert is merciful. The carena favour the egbert. If someone favour the carena then the carena does not eat the egbert. If someone accession the egbert and the egbert grass the carena then the egbert does not eat the carena. If someone favour the egbert then they eat the egbert. If someone accession the carena then they are distaff. If someone is merciful then they chase the carena. If someone is largo and they do not see the carena then they chase the carena. The egbert is not distaff.", "logic": "\nMerciful(egbert)\nFavour(carena, egbert)\nforall x (Favour(x, carena) -> not Accession(carena, egbert))\nforall x (Accession(x, egbert) and Grass(egbert, carena) -> not Accession(egbert, carena))\nforall x (Favour(x, egbert) -> Accession(x, egbert))\nforall x (Accession(x, carena) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Merciful(x) -> Grass(x, carena))\nforall x (Largo(x) and not Favour(x, carena) -> Grass(x, carena))\n\nnot Distaff(egbert)\n\nforall x (Accession(x, carena) -> Distaff(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The ammamaria is romish. The wynton stab the ammamaria. If someone stab the wynton then the wynton does not eat the ammamaria. If someone rewire the ammamaria and the ammamaria layer the wynton then the ammamaria does not eat the wynton. If someone stab the ammamaria then they eat the ammamaria. If someone rewire the wynton then they are risen. If someone is romish then they chase the wynton. If someone is alimentary and they do not see the wynton then they chase the wynton. The wynton is risen.", "logic": "\nRomish(ammamaria)\nStab(wynton, ammamaria)\nforall x (Stab(x, wynton) -> not Rewire(wynton, ammamaria))\nforall x (Rewire(x, ammamaria) and Layer(ammamaria, wynton) -> not Rewire(ammamaria, wynton))\nforall x (Stab(x, ammamaria) -> Rewire(x, ammamaria))\nforall x (Rewire(x, wynton) -> Risen(x))\nforall x (Romish(x) -> Layer(x, wynton))\nforall x (Alimentary(x) and not Stab(x, wynton) -> Layer(x, wynton))\n\nRisen(wynton)\n\nforall x (Rewire(x, wynton) -> Risen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The remy is outlying. The tudor exudate the remy. If someone exudate the tudor then the tudor does not eat the remy. If someone fluctuate the remy and the remy arbitrage the tudor then the remy does not eat the tudor. If someone exudate the remy then they eat the remy. If someone fluctuate the tudor then they are hooved. If someone is outlying then they chase the tudor. If someone is sterilised and they do not see the tudor then they chase the tudor. The tudor does not chase the tudor.", "logic": "\nOutlying(remy)\nExudate(tudor, remy)\nforall x (Exudate(x, tudor) -> not Fluctuate(tudor, remy))\nforall x (Fluctuate(x, remy) and Arbitrage(remy, tudor) -> not Fluctuate(remy, tudor))\nforall x (Exudate(x, remy) -> Fluctuate(x, remy))\nforall x (Fluctuate(x, tudor) -> Hooved(x))\nforall x (Outlying(x) -> Arbitrage(x, tudor))\nforall x (Sterilised(x) and not Exudate(x, tudor) -> Arbitrage(x, tudor))\n\nnot Arbitrage(tudor, tudor)\n\nforall x (Outlying(x) -> Arbitrage(x, tudor)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The guy is labored. The jobyna cheer the guy. If someone cheer the jobyna then the jobyna does not eat the guy. If someone resinate the guy and the guy cypher the jobyna then the guy does not eat the jobyna. If someone cheer the guy then they eat the guy. If someone resinate the jobyna then they are coriaceous. If someone is labored then they chase the jobyna. If someone is unripened and they do not see the jobyna then they chase the jobyna. The guy cheer the guy.", "logic": "\nLabored(guy)\nCheer(jobyna, guy)\nforall x (Cheer(x, jobyna) -> not Resinate(jobyna, guy))\nforall x (Resinate(x, guy) and Cypher(guy, jobyna) -> not Resinate(guy, jobyna))\nforall x (Cheer(x, guy) -> Resinate(x, guy))\nforall x (Resinate(x, jobyna) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Labored(x) -> Cypher(x, jobyna))\nforall x (Unripened(x) and not Cheer(x, jobyna) -> Cypher(x, jobyna))\n\nCheer(guy, guy)\n\nCheer(guy, guy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The malinda is xcii. The keith maunder the malinda. If someone maunder the keith then the keith does not eat the malinda. If someone delimit the malinda and the malinda mooch the keith then the malinda does not eat the keith. If someone maunder the malinda then they eat the malinda. If someone delimit the keith then they are pendant. If someone is xcii then they chase the keith. If someone is impending and they do not see the keith then they chase the keith. The keith does not eat the keith.", "logic": "\nXcii(malinda)\nMaunder(keith, malinda)\nforall x (Maunder(x, keith) -> not Delimit(keith, malinda))\nforall x (Delimit(x, malinda) and Mooch(malinda, keith) -> not Delimit(malinda, keith))\nforall x (Maunder(x, malinda) -> Delimit(x, malinda))\nforall x (Delimit(x, keith) -> Pendant(x))\nforall x (Xcii(x) -> Mooch(x, keith))\nforall x (Impending(x) and not Maunder(x, keith) -> Mooch(x, keith))\n\nnot Delimit(keith, keith)\n\nnot Delimit(keith, keith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The beryle is grownup. The berri fertilize the beryle. If someone fertilize the berri then the berri does not eat the beryle. If someone ambulate the beryle and the beryle spay the berri then the beryle does not eat the berri. If someone fertilize the beryle then they eat the beryle. If someone ambulate the berri then they are relaxant. If someone is grownup then they chase the berri. If someone is cowled and they do not see the berri then they chase the berri. The beryle fertilize the berri.", "logic": "\nGrownup(beryle)\nFertilize(berri, beryle)\nforall x (Fertilize(x, berri) -> not Ambulate(berri, beryle))\nforall x (Ambulate(x, beryle) and Spay(beryle, berri) -> not Ambulate(beryle, berri))\nforall x (Fertilize(x, beryle) -> Ambulate(x, beryle))\nforall x (Ambulate(x, berri) -> Relaxant(x))\nforall x (Grownup(x) -> Spay(x, berri))\nforall x (Cowled(x) and not Fertilize(x, berri) -> Spay(x, berri))\n\nFertilize(beryle, berri)\n\nFertilize(beryle, berri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-840"} {"premises": "The marthe twitter the guy. The guy is creaseless. If something twitter the guy and it venerate the guy then the guy whirr the marthe. If the guy whirr the marthe then the marthe whirr the guy. If something twitter the guy then the guy twitter the marthe. If something whirr the marthe then it is perilous. If something venerate the marthe and the marthe venerate the guy then the guy whirr the marthe. If something is postal and it twitter the guy then it twitter the marthe. If the guy twitter the marthe then the guy venerate the marthe. If something is postal and it venerate the guy then the guy venerate the marthe. The marthe twitter the guy.", "logic": "\nTwitter(marthe, guy)\nCreaseless(guy)\nforall x (Twitter(x, guy) and Venerate(x, guy) -> Whirr(guy, marthe))\nWhirr(guy, marthe) -> Whirr(marthe, guy)\nforall x (Twitter(x, guy) -> Twitter(guy, marthe))\nforall x (Whirr(x, marthe) -> Perilous(x))\nforall x (Venerate(x, marthe) and Venerate(marthe, guy) -> Whirr(guy, marthe))\nforall x (Postal(x) and Twitter(x, guy) -> Twitter(x, marthe))\nTwitter(guy, marthe) -> Venerate(guy, marthe)\nforall x (Postal(x) and Venerate(x, guy) -> Venerate(guy, marthe))\n\nTwitter(marthe, guy)\n\ntherefore Twitter(marthe, guy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The krystalle thoriate the barn. The barn is harsh. If something thoriate the barn and it cicatrize the barn then the barn balkanize the krystalle. If the barn balkanize the krystalle then the krystalle balkanize the barn. If something thoriate the barn then the barn thoriate the krystalle. If something balkanize the krystalle then it is wriggly. If something cicatrize the krystalle and the krystalle cicatrize the barn then the barn balkanize the krystalle. If something is drizzling and it thoriate the barn then it thoriate the krystalle. If the barn thoriate the krystalle then the barn cicatrize the krystalle. If something is drizzling and it cicatrize the barn then the barn cicatrize the krystalle. The krystalle does not need the barn.", "logic": "\nThoriate(krystalle, barn)\nHarsh(barn)\nforall x (Thoriate(x, barn) and Cicatrize(x, barn) -> Balkanize(barn, krystalle))\nBalkanize(barn, krystalle) -> Balkanize(krystalle, barn)\nforall x (Thoriate(x, barn) -> Thoriate(barn, krystalle))\nforall x (Balkanize(x, krystalle) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, krystalle) and Cicatrize(krystalle, barn) -> Balkanize(barn, krystalle))\nforall x (Drizzling(x) and Thoriate(x, barn) -> Thoriate(x, krystalle))\nThoriate(barn, krystalle) -> Cicatrize(barn, krystalle)\nforall x (Drizzling(x) and Cicatrize(x, barn) -> Cicatrize(barn, krystalle))\n\nnot Thoriate(krystalle, barn)\n\ntherefore Thoriate(krystalle, barn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The guthrie center the cleland. The cleland is humanlike. If something center the cleland and it intercept the cleland then the cleland ooze the guthrie. If the cleland ooze the guthrie then the guthrie ooze the cleland. If something center the cleland then the cleland center the guthrie. If something ooze the guthrie then it is cruciform. If something intercept the guthrie and the guthrie intercept the cleland then the cleland ooze the guthrie. If something is incoherent and it center the cleland then it center the guthrie. If the cleland center the guthrie then the cleland intercept the guthrie. If something is incoherent and it intercept the cleland then the cleland intercept the guthrie. The cleland center the guthrie.", "logic": "\nCenter(guthrie, cleland)\nHumanlike(cleland)\nforall x (Center(x, cleland) and Intercept(x, cleland) -> Ooze(cleland, guthrie))\nOoze(cleland, guthrie) -> Ooze(guthrie, cleland)\nforall x (Center(x, cleland) -> Center(cleland, guthrie))\nforall x (Ooze(x, guthrie) -> Cruciform(x))\nforall x (Intercept(x, guthrie) and Intercept(guthrie, cleland) -> Ooze(cleland, guthrie))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and Center(x, cleland) -> Center(x, guthrie))\nCenter(cleland, guthrie) -> Intercept(cleland, guthrie)\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and Intercept(x, cleland) -> Intercept(cleland, guthrie))\n\nCenter(cleland, guthrie)\n\nCenter(guthrie, cleland) and forall x (Center(x, cleland) -> Center(cleland, guthrie)) -> therefore Center(cleland, guthrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The preston recurve the zsazsa. The zsazsa is reversed. If something recurve the zsazsa and it govern the zsazsa then the zsazsa woolgather the preston. If the zsazsa woolgather the preston then the preston woolgather the zsazsa. If something recurve the zsazsa then the zsazsa recurve the preston. If something woolgather the preston then it is apropos. If something govern the preston and the preston govern the zsazsa then the zsazsa woolgather the preston. If something is norse and it recurve the zsazsa then it recurve the preston. If the zsazsa recurve the preston then the zsazsa govern the preston. If something is norse and it govern the zsazsa then the zsazsa govern the preston. The zsazsa does not need the preston.", "logic": "\nRecurve(preston, zsazsa)\nReversed(zsazsa)\nforall x (Recurve(x, zsazsa) and Govern(x, zsazsa) -> Woolgather(zsazsa, preston))\nWoolgather(zsazsa, preston) -> Woolgather(preston, zsazsa)\nforall x (Recurve(x, zsazsa) -> Recurve(zsazsa, preston))\nforall x (Woolgather(x, preston) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Govern(x, preston) and Govern(preston, zsazsa) -> Woolgather(zsazsa, preston))\nforall x (Norse(x) and Recurve(x, zsazsa) -> Recurve(x, preston))\nRecurve(zsazsa, preston) -> Govern(zsazsa, preston)\nforall x (Norse(x) and Govern(x, zsazsa) -> Govern(zsazsa, preston))\n\nnot Recurve(zsazsa, preston)\n\nRecurve(preston, zsazsa) and forall x (Recurve(x, zsazsa) -> Recurve(zsazsa, preston)) -> therefore Recurve(zsazsa, preston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The adrianne bankroll the sarita. The sarita is kuwaiti. If something bankroll the sarita and it impeach the sarita then the sarita catenate the adrianne. If the sarita catenate the adrianne then the adrianne catenate the sarita. If something bankroll the sarita then the sarita bankroll the adrianne. If something catenate the adrianne then it is voidable. If something impeach the adrianne and the adrianne impeach the sarita then the sarita catenate the adrianne. If something is moresque and it bankroll the sarita then it bankroll the adrianne. If the sarita bankroll the adrianne then the sarita impeach the adrianne. If something is moresque and it impeach the sarita then the sarita impeach the adrianne. The sarita impeach the adrianne.", "logic": "\nBankroll(adrianne, sarita)\nKuwaiti(sarita)\nforall x (Bankroll(x, sarita) and Impeach(x, sarita) -> Catenate(sarita, adrianne))\nCatenate(sarita, adrianne) -> Catenate(adrianne, sarita)\nforall x (Bankroll(x, sarita) -> Bankroll(sarita, adrianne))\nforall x (Catenate(x, adrianne) -> Voidable(x))\nforall x (Impeach(x, adrianne) and Impeach(adrianne, sarita) -> Catenate(sarita, adrianne))\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Bankroll(x, sarita) -> Bankroll(x, adrianne))\nBankroll(sarita, adrianne) -> Impeach(sarita, adrianne)\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Impeach(x, sarita) -> Impeach(sarita, adrianne))\n\nImpeach(sarita, adrianne)\n\nBankroll(adrianne, sarita) and forall x (Bankroll(x, sarita) -> Bankroll(sarita, adrianne)) -> therefore Bankroll(sarita, adrianne) Bankroll(sarita, adrianne) and Bankroll(sarita, adrianne) -> Impeach(sarita, adrianne) -> therefore Impeach(sarita, adrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The brigid ruin the niels. The niels is tenable. If something ruin the niels and it misprint the niels then the niels subedit the brigid. If the niels subedit the brigid then the brigid subedit the niels. If something ruin the niels then the niels ruin the brigid. If something subedit the brigid then it is retrousse. If something misprint the brigid and the brigid misprint the niels then the niels subedit the brigid. If something is papal and it ruin the niels then it ruin the brigid. If the niels ruin the brigid then the niels misprint the brigid. If something is papal and it misprint the niels then the niels misprint the brigid. The niels does not like the brigid.", "logic": "\nRuin(brigid, niels)\nTenable(niels)\nforall x (Ruin(x, niels) and Misprint(x, niels) -> Subedit(niels, brigid))\nSubedit(niels, brigid) -> Subedit(brigid, niels)\nforall x (Ruin(x, niels) -> Ruin(niels, brigid))\nforall x (Subedit(x, brigid) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Misprint(x, brigid) and Misprint(brigid, niels) -> Subedit(niels, brigid))\nforall x (Papal(x) and Ruin(x, niels) -> Ruin(x, brigid))\nRuin(niels, brigid) -> Misprint(niels, brigid)\nforall x (Papal(x) and Misprint(x, niels) -> Misprint(niels, brigid))\n\nnot Misprint(niels, brigid)\n\nRuin(brigid, niels) and forall x (Ruin(x, niels) -> Ruin(niels, brigid)) -> therefore Ruin(niels, brigid) Ruin(niels, brigid) and Ruin(niels, brigid) -> Misprint(niels, brigid) -> therefore Misprint(niels, brigid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The hunt resorb the virgina. The virgina is dressed. If something resorb the virgina and it advocate the virgina then the virgina infect the hunt. If the virgina infect the hunt then the hunt infect the virgina. If something resorb the virgina then the virgina resorb the hunt. If something infect the hunt then it is cheesy. If something advocate the hunt and the hunt advocate the virgina then the virgina infect the hunt. If something is monoclinal and it resorb the virgina then it resorb the hunt. If the virgina resorb the hunt then the virgina advocate the hunt. If something is monoclinal and it advocate the virgina then the virgina advocate the hunt. The hunt does not need the hunt.", "logic": "\nResorb(hunt, virgina)\nDressed(virgina)\nforall x (Resorb(x, virgina) and Advocate(x, virgina) -> Infect(virgina, hunt))\nInfect(virgina, hunt) -> Infect(hunt, virgina)\nforall x (Resorb(x, virgina) -> Resorb(virgina, hunt))\nforall x (Infect(x, hunt) -> Cheesy(x))\nforall x (Advocate(x, hunt) and Advocate(hunt, virgina) -> Infect(virgina, hunt))\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) and Resorb(x, virgina) -> Resorb(x, hunt))\nResorb(virgina, hunt) -> Advocate(virgina, hunt)\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) and Advocate(x, virgina) -> Advocate(virgina, hunt))\n\nnot Resorb(hunt, hunt)\n\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) and Resorb(x, virgina) -> Resorb(x, hunt)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The ibby sandwich the rem. The rem is cosmogenic. If something sandwich the rem and it autopsy the rem then the rem clutter the ibby. If the rem clutter the ibby then the ibby clutter the rem. If something sandwich the rem then the rem sandwich the ibby. If something clutter the ibby then it is runcinate. If something autopsy the ibby and the ibby autopsy the rem then the rem clutter the ibby. If something is misplaced and it sandwich the rem then it sandwich the ibby. If the rem sandwich the ibby then the rem autopsy the ibby. If something is misplaced and it autopsy the rem then the rem autopsy the ibby. The rem clutter the ibby.", "logic": "\nSandwich(ibby, rem)\nCosmogenic(rem)\nforall x (Sandwich(x, rem) and Autopsy(x, rem) -> Clutter(rem, ibby))\nClutter(rem, ibby) -> Clutter(ibby, rem)\nforall x (Sandwich(x, rem) -> Sandwich(rem, ibby))\nforall x (Clutter(x, ibby) -> Runcinate(x))\nforall x (Autopsy(x, ibby) and Autopsy(ibby, rem) -> Clutter(rem, ibby))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) and Sandwich(x, rem) -> Sandwich(x, ibby))\nSandwich(rem, ibby) -> Autopsy(rem, ibby)\nforall x (Misplaced(x) and Autopsy(x, rem) -> Autopsy(rem, ibby))\n\nClutter(rem, ibby)\n\nforall x (Sandwich(x, rem) and Autopsy(x, rem) -> Clutter(rem, ibby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The ginelle husband the bianca. The bianca is coexisting. If something husband the bianca and it grizzle the bianca then the bianca fade the ginelle. If the bianca fade the ginelle then the ginelle fade the bianca. If something husband the bianca then the bianca husband the ginelle. If something fade the ginelle then it is miry. If something grizzle the ginelle and the ginelle grizzle the bianca then the bianca fade the ginelle. If something is upwind and it husband the bianca then it husband the ginelle. If the bianca husband the ginelle then the bianca grizzle the ginelle. If something is upwind and it grizzle the bianca then the bianca grizzle the ginelle. The bianca is not miry.", "logic": "\nHusband(ginelle, bianca)\nCoexisting(bianca)\nforall x (Husband(x, bianca) and Grizzle(x, bianca) -> Fade(bianca, ginelle))\nFade(bianca, ginelle) -> Fade(ginelle, bianca)\nforall x (Husband(x, bianca) -> Husband(bianca, ginelle))\nforall x (Fade(x, ginelle) -> Miry(x))\nforall x (Grizzle(x, ginelle) and Grizzle(ginelle, bianca) -> Fade(bianca, ginelle))\nforall x (Upwind(x) and Husband(x, bianca) -> Husband(x, ginelle))\nHusband(bianca, ginelle) -> Grizzle(bianca, ginelle)\nforall x (Upwind(x) and Grizzle(x, bianca) -> Grizzle(bianca, ginelle))\n\nnot Miry(bianca)\n\nforall x (Fade(x, ginelle) -> Miry(x)) <- forall x (Husband(x, bianca) and Grizzle(x, bianca) -> Fade(bianca, ginelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The atlanta foredate the gwenni. The gwenni is exoergic. If something foredate the gwenni and it dillydally the gwenni then the gwenni respect the atlanta. If the gwenni respect the atlanta then the atlanta respect the gwenni. If something foredate the gwenni then the gwenni foredate the atlanta. If something respect the atlanta then it is caducean. If something dillydally the atlanta and the atlanta dillydally the gwenni then the gwenni respect the atlanta. If something is greensick and it foredate the gwenni then it foredate the atlanta. If the gwenni foredate the atlanta then the gwenni dillydally the atlanta. If something is greensick and it dillydally the gwenni then the gwenni dillydally the atlanta. The atlanta respect the atlanta.", "logic": "\nForedate(atlanta, gwenni)\nExoergic(gwenni)\nforall x (Foredate(x, gwenni) and Dillydally(x, gwenni) -> Respect(gwenni, atlanta))\nRespect(gwenni, atlanta) -> Respect(atlanta, gwenni)\nforall x (Foredate(x, gwenni) -> Foredate(gwenni, atlanta))\nforall x (Respect(x, atlanta) -> Caducean(x))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, atlanta) and Dillydally(atlanta, gwenni) -> Respect(gwenni, atlanta))\nforall x (Greensick(x) and Foredate(x, gwenni) -> Foredate(x, atlanta))\nForedate(gwenni, atlanta) -> Dillydally(gwenni, atlanta)\nforall x (Greensick(x) and Dillydally(x, gwenni) -> Dillydally(gwenni, atlanta))\n\nRespect(atlanta, atlanta)\n\nRespect(atlanta, atlanta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The halvard handcuff the tiler. The tiler is racial. If something handcuff the tiler and it seem the tiler then the tiler discase the halvard. If the tiler discase the halvard then the halvard discase the tiler. If something handcuff the tiler then the tiler handcuff the halvard. If something discase the halvard then it is beneficent. If something seem the halvard and the halvard seem the tiler then the tiler discase the halvard. If something is ungreased and it handcuff the tiler then it handcuff the halvard. If the tiler handcuff the halvard then the tiler seem the halvard. If something is ungreased and it seem the tiler then the tiler seem the halvard. The tiler does not see the tiler.", "logic": "\nHandcuff(halvard, tiler)\nRacial(tiler)\nforall x (Handcuff(x, tiler) and Seem(x, tiler) -> Discase(tiler, halvard))\nDiscase(tiler, halvard) -> Discase(halvard, tiler)\nforall x (Handcuff(x, tiler) -> Handcuff(tiler, halvard))\nforall x (Discase(x, halvard) -> Beneficent(x))\nforall x (Seem(x, halvard) and Seem(halvard, tiler) -> Discase(tiler, halvard))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Handcuff(x, tiler) -> Handcuff(x, halvard))\nHandcuff(tiler, halvard) -> Seem(tiler, halvard)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Seem(x, tiler) -> Seem(tiler, halvard))\n\nnot Discase(tiler, tiler)\n\nnot Discase(tiler, tiler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The xylia hotfoot the dore. The dore is filmable. If something hotfoot the dore and it outrange the dore then the dore dislocate the xylia. If the dore dislocate the xylia then the xylia dislocate the dore. If something hotfoot the dore then the dore hotfoot the xylia. If something dislocate the xylia then it is noduled. If something outrange the xylia and the xylia outrange the dore then the dore dislocate the xylia. If something is cheerful and it hotfoot the dore then it hotfoot the xylia. If the dore hotfoot the xylia then the dore outrange the xylia. If something is cheerful and it outrange the dore then the dore outrange the xylia. The dore is rough.", "logic": "\nHotfoot(xylia, dore)\nFilmable(dore)\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, dore) and Outrange(x, dore) -> Dislocate(dore, xylia))\nDislocate(dore, xylia) -> Dislocate(xylia, dore)\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, dore) -> Hotfoot(dore, xylia))\nforall x (Dislocate(x, xylia) -> Noduled(x))\nforall x (Outrange(x, xylia) and Outrange(xylia, dore) -> Dislocate(dore, xylia))\nforall x (Cheerful(x) and Hotfoot(x, dore) -> Hotfoot(x, xylia))\nHotfoot(dore, xylia) -> Outrange(dore, xylia)\nforall x (Cheerful(x) and Outrange(x, dore) -> Outrange(dore, xylia))\n\nRough(dore)\n\nRough(dore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1763"} {"premises": "The loralie catechise the ritchie. The loralie is bovid. The loralie is roasted. The loralie honeymoon the diena. The loralie anglicize the ritchie. The rock is solar. The diena is roasted. The ritchie catechise the diena. The ritchie anglicize the loralie. The ritchie anglicize the diena. If something is roasted and it anglicize the ritchie then the ritchie anglicize the rock. If something is solar and it honeymoon the diena then the diena is smuggled. If something anglicize the loralie and the loralie catechise the ritchie then the loralie is solar. The rock is solar.", "logic": "\nCatechise(loralie, ritchie)\nBovid(loralie)\nRoasted(loralie)\nHoneymoon(loralie, diena)\nAnglicize(loralie, ritchie)\nSolar(rock)\nRoasted(diena)\nCatechise(ritchie, diena)\nAnglicize(ritchie, loralie)\nAnglicize(ritchie, diena)\nforall x (Roasted(x) and Anglicize(x, ritchie) -> Anglicize(ritchie, rock))\nforall x (Solar(x) and Honeymoon(x, diena) -> Smuggled(diena))\nforall x (Anglicize(x, loralie) and Catechise(loralie, ritchie) -> Solar(loralie))\n\nSolar(rock)\n\ntherefore Solar(rock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The adey exposit the marmaduke. The adey is louvered. The adey is weathered. The adey voice the yettie. The adey iodinate the marmaduke. The tamar is offish. The yettie is weathered. The marmaduke exposit the yettie. The marmaduke iodinate the adey. The marmaduke iodinate the yettie. If something is weathered and it iodinate the marmaduke then the marmaduke iodinate the tamar. If something is offish and it voice the yettie then the yettie is graded. If something iodinate the adey and the adey exposit the marmaduke then the adey is offish. The marmaduke does not visit the yettie.", "logic": "\nExposit(adey, marmaduke)\nLouvered(adey)\nWeathered(adey)\nVoice(adey, yettie)\nIodinate(adey, marmaduke)\nOffish(tamar)\nWeathered(yettie)\nExposit(marmaduke, yettie)\nIodinate(marmaduke, adey)\nIodinate(marmaduke, yettie)\nforall x (Weathered(x) and Iodinate(x, marmaduke) -> Iodinate(marmaduke, tamar))\nforall x (Offish(x) and Voice(x, yettie) -> Graded(yettie))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, adey) and Exposit(adey, marmaduke) -> Offish(adey))\n\nnot Iodinate(marmaduke, yettie)\n\ntherefore Iodinate(marmaduke, yettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The sergei engineer the cris. The sergei is regardless. The sergei is flagging. The sergei squawk the stanislaw. The sergei caravan the cris. The astra is septate. The stanislaw is flagging. The cris engineer the stanislaw. The cris caravan the sergei. The cris caravan the stanislaw. If something is flagging and it caravan the cris then the cris caravan the astra. If something is septate and it squawk the stanislaw then the stanislaw is uphill. If something caravan the sergei and the sergei engineer the cris then the sergei is septate. The cris caravan the astra.", "logic": "\nEngineer(sergei, cris)\nRegardless(sergei)\nFlagging(sergei)\nSquawk(sergei, stanislaw)\nCaravan(sergei, cris)\nSeptate(astra)\nFlagging(stanislaw)\nEngineer(cris, stanislaw)\nCaravan(cris, sergei)\nCaravan(cris, stanislaw)\nforall x (Flagging(x) and Caravan(x, cris) -> Caravan(cris, astra))\nforall x (Septate(x) and Squawk(x, stanislaw) -> Uphill(stanislaw))\nforall x (Caravan(x, sergei) and Engineer(sergei, cris) -> Septate(sergei))\n\nCaravan(cris, astra)\n\nFlagging(sergei) and Caravan(sergei, cris) and forall x (Flagging(x) and Caravan(x, cris) -> Caravan(cris, astra)) -> therefore Caravan(cris, astra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The davis warp the apollo. The davis is ectopic. The davis is untagged. The davis unfold the chariot. The davis memorize the apollo. The luana is breathless. The chariot is untagged. The apollo warp the chariot. The apollo memorize the davis. The apollo memorize the chariot. If something is untagged and it memorize the apollo then the apollo memorize the luana. If something is breathless and it unfold the chariot then the chariot is xlii. If something memorize the davis and the davis warp the apollo then the davis is breathless. The apollo does not visit the luana.", "logic": "\nWarp(davis, apollo)\nEctopic(davis)\nUntagged(davis)\nUnfold(davis, chariot)\nMemorize(davis, apollo)\nBreathless(luana)\nUntagged(chariot)\nWarp(apollo, chariot)\nMemorize(apollo, davis)\nMemorize(apollo, chariot)\nforall x (Untagged(x) and Memorize(x, apollo) -> Memorize(apollo, luana))\nforall x (Breathless(x) and Unfold(x, chariot) -> Xlii(chariot))\nforall x (Memorize(x, davis) and Warp(davis, apollo) -> Breathless(davis))\n\nnot Memorize(apollo, luana)\n\nUntagged(davis) and Memorize(davis, apollo) and forall x (Untagged(x) and Memorize(x, apollo) -> Memorize(apollo, luana)) -> therefore Memorize(apollo, luana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The leonora absorb the mike. The leonora is comburant. The leonora is augean. The leonora benefit the bernd. The leonora bespot the mike. The kitti is aphakic. The bernd is augean. The mike absorb the bernd. The mike bespot the leonora. The mike bespot the bernd. If something is augean and it bespot the mike then the mike bespot the kitti. If something is aphakic and it benefit the bernd then the bernd is danish. If something bespot the leonora and the leonora absorb the mike then the leonora is aphakic. The bernd is danish.", "logic": "\nAbsorb(leonora, mike)\nComburant(leonora)\nAugean(leonora)\nBenefit(leonora, bernd)\nBespot(leonora, mike)\nAphakic(kitti)\nAugean(bernd)\nAbsorb(mike, bernd)\nBespot(mike, leonora)\nBespot(mike, bernd)\nforall x (Augean(x) and Bespot(x, mike) -> Bespot(mike, kitti))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) and Benefit(x, bernd) -> Danish(bernd))\nforall x (Bespot(x, leonora) and Absorb(leonora, mike) -> Aphakic(leonora))\n\nDanish(bernd)\n\nBespot(mike, leonora) and Absorb(leonora, mike) and forall x (Bespot(x, leonora) and Absorb(leonora, mike) -> Aphakic(leonora)) -> therefore Aphakic(leonora) Aphakic(leonora) and Benefit(leonora, bernd) and forall x (Aphakic(x) and Benefit(x, bernd) -> Danish(bernd)) -> therefore Danish(bernd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The stefano warp the kat. The stefano is recurved. The stefano is bedimmed. The stefano gate the wylma. The stefano cover the kat. The hartley is sheared. The wylma is bedimmed. The kat warp the wylma. The kat cover the stefano. The kat cover the wylma. If something is bedimmed and it cover the kat then the kat cover the hartley. If something is sheared and it gate the wylma then the wylma is sensate. If something cover the stefano and the stefano warp the kat then the stefano is sheared. The wylma is not sensate.", "logic": "\nWarp(stefano, kat)\nRecurved(stefano)\nBedimmed(stefano)\nGate(stefano, wylma)\nCover(stefano, kat)\nSheared(hartley)\nBedimmed(wylma)\nWarp(kat, wylma)\nCover(kat, stefano)\nCover(kat, wylma)\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) and Cover(x, kat) -> Cover(kat, hartley))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and Gate(x, wylma) -> Sensate(wylma))\nforall x (Cover(x, stefano) and Warp(stefano, kat) -> Sheared(stefano))\n\nnot Sensate(wylma)\n\nCover(kat, stefano) and Warp(stefano, kat) and forall x (Cover(x, stefano) and Warp(stefano, kat) -> Sheared(stefano)) -> therefore Sheared(stefano) Sheared(stefano) and Gate(stefano, wylma) and forall x (Sheared(x) and Gate(x, wylma) -> Sensate(wylma)) -> therefore Sensate(wylma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The joela will the lucia. The joela is poisonous. The joela is glamourous. The joela dislike the krysta. The joela evanesce the lucia. The alister is charcoal. The krysta is glamourous. The lucia will the krysta. The lucia evanesce the joela. The lucia evanesce the krysta. If something is glamourous and it evanesce the lucia then the lucia evanesce the alister. If something is charcoal and it dislike the krysta then the krysta is uppermost. If something evanesce the joela and the joela will the lucia then the joela is charcoal. The lucia is not glamourous.", "logic": "\nWill(joela, lucia)\nPoisonous(joela)\nGlamourous(joela)\nDislike(joela, krysta)\nEvanesce(joela, lucia)\nCharcoal(alister)\nGlamourous(krysta)\nWill(lucia, krysta)\nEvanesce(lucia, joela)\nEvanesce(lucia, krysta)\nforall x (Glamourous(x) and Evanesce(x, lucia) -> Evanesce(lucia, alister))\nforall x (Charcoal(x) and Dislike(x, krysta) -> Uppermost(krysta))\nforall x (Evanesce(x, joela) and Will(joela, lucia) -> Charcoal(joela))\n\nnot Glamourous(lucia)\n\nnot Glamourous(lucia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The phebe maneuver the renate. The phebe is biserrate. The phebe is bismuthic. The phebe ford the lynnette. The phebe ramble the renate. The flossy is asterisked. The lynnette is bismuthic. The renate maneuver the lynnette. The renate ramble the phebe. The renate ramble the lynnette. If something is bismuthic and it ramble the renate then the renate ramble the flossy. If something is asterisked and it ford the lynnette then the lynnette is impolitic. If something ramble the phebe and the phebe maneuver the renate then the phebe is asterisked. The renate ford the phebe.", "logic": "\nManeuver(phebe, renate)\nBiserrate(phebe)\nBismuthic(phebe)\nFord(phebe, lynnette)\nRamble(phebe, renate)\nAsterisked(flossy)\nBismuthic(lynnette)\nManeuver(renate, lynnette)\nRamble(renate, phebe)\nRamble(renate, lynnette)\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) and Ramble(x, renate) -> Ramble(renate, flossy))\nforall x (Asterisked(x) and Ford(x, lynnette) -> Impolitic(lynnette))\nforall x (Ramble(x, phebe) and Maneuver(phebe, renate) -> Asterisked(phebe))\n\nFord(renate, phebe)\n\nFord(renate, phebe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The isador prohibit the wiatt. The isador is placoid. The isador is weeny. The isador doubt the juliane. The isador whipsaw the wiatt. The hendrik is coagulate. The juliane is weeny. The wiatt prohibit the juliane. The wiatt whipsaw the isador. The wiatt whipsaw the juliane. If something is weeny and it whipsaw the wiatt then the wiatt whipsaw the hendrik. If something is coagulate and it doubt the juliane then the juliane is refreshful. If something whipsaw the isador and the isador prohibit the wiatt then the isador is coagulate. The juliane does not like the wiatt.", "logic": "\nProhibit(isador, wiatt)\nPlacoid(isador)\nWeeny(isador)\nDoubt(isador, juliane)\nWhipsaw(isador, wiatt)\nCoagulate(hendrik)\nWeeny(juliane)\nProhibit(wiatt, juliane)\nWhipsaw(wiatt, isador)\nWhipsaw(wiatt, juliane)\nforall x (Weeny(x) and Whipsaw(x, wiatt) -> Whipsaw(wiatt, hendrik))\nforall x (Coagulate(x) and Doubt(x, juliane) -> Refreshful(juliane))\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, isador) and Prohibit(isador, wiatt) -> Coagulate(isador))\n\nnot Doubt(juliane, wiatt)\n\nnot Doubt(juliane, wiatt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The gerrie posit the jim. The gerrie is romanian. The gerrie is autumnal. The gerrie demonetize the adele. The gerrie asseverate the jim. The jay is spoken. The adele is autumnal. The jim posit the adele. The jim asseverate the gerrie. The jim asseverate the adele. If something is autumnal and it asseverate the jim then the jim asseverate the jay. If something is spoken and it demonetize the adele then the adele is swank. If something asseverate the gerrie and the gerrie posit the jim then the gerrie is spoken. The jim asseverate the jim.", "logic": "\nPosit(gerrie, jim)\nRomanian(gerrie)\nAutumnal(gerrie)\nDemonetize(gerrie, adele)\nAsseverate(gerrie, jim)\nSpoken(jay)\nAutumnal(adele)\nPosit(jim, adele)\nAsseverate(jim, gerrie)\nAsseverate(jim, adele)\nforall x (Autumnal(x) and Asseverate(x, jim) -> Asseverate(jim, jay))\nforall x (Spoken(x) and Demonetize(x, adele) -> Swank(adele))\nforall x (Asseverate(x, gerrie) and Posit(gerrie, jim) -> Spoken(gerrie))\n\nAsseverate(jim, jim)\n\nAsseverate(jim, jim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The binni verdigris the gayleen. The binni is manky. The binni is gaelic. The binni bifurcate the garp. The binni fasten the gayleen. The chiquita is coccoid. The garp is gaelic. The gayleen verdigris the garp. The gayleen fasten the binni. The gayleen fasten the garp. If something is gaelic and it fasten the gayleen then the gayleen fasten the chiquita. If something is coccoid and it bifurcate the garp then the garp is changed. If something fasten the binni and the binni verdigris the gayleen then the binni is coccoid. The garp is not manky.", "logic": "\nVerdigris(binni, gayleen)\nManky(binni)\nGaelic(binni)\nBifurcate(binni, garp)\nFasten(binni, gayleen)\nCoccoid(chiquita)\nGaelic(garp)\nVerdigris(gayleen, garp)\nFasten(gayleen, binni)\nFasten(gayleen, garp)\nforall x (Gaelic(x) and Fasten(x, gayleen) -> Fasten(gayleen, chiquita))\nforall x (Coccoid(x) and Bifurcate(x, garp) -> Changed(garp))\nforall x (Fasten(x, binni) and Verdigris(binni, gayleen) -> Coccoid(binni))\n\nnot Manky(garp)\n\nnot Manky(garp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The nadine cowhide the murphy. The nadine is xxxv. The nadine is monandrous. The nadine phonate the sheree. The nadine obscure the murphy. The geoffrey is squared. The sheree is monandrous. The murphy cowhide the sheree. The murphy obscure the nadine. The murphy obscure the sheree. If something is monandrous and it obscure the murphy then the murphy obscure the geoffrey. If something is squared and it phonate the sheree then the sheree is blooded. If something obscure the nadine and the nadine cowhide the murphy then the nadine is squared. The nadine phonate the murphy.", "logic": "\nCowhide(nadine, murphy)\nXxxv(nadine)\nMonandrous(nadine)\nPhonate(nadine, sheree)\nObscure(nadine, murphy)\nSquared(geoffrey)\nMonandrous(sheree)\nCowhide(murphy, sheree)\nObscure(murphy, nadine)\nObscure(murphy, sheree)\nforall x (Monandrous(x) and Obscure(x, murphy) -> Obscure(murphy, geoffrey))\nforall x (Squared(x) and Phonate(x, sheree) -> Blooded(sheree))\nforall x (Obscure(x, nadine) and Cowhide(nadine, murphy) -> Squared(nadine))\n\nPhonate(nadine, murphy)\n\nPhonate(nadine, murphy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-818"} {"premises": "The renault does not eat the derrek. The renault is unprompted. The renault is acidulous. The renault spoon the derrek. The renault spoon the winifield. The renault overarch the winifield. The derrek baronetize the winifield. The derrek overarch the winifield. The winifield baronetize the renault. The winifield baronetize the derrek. The winifield is liplike. The winifield is digressive. The winifield is acidulous. The winifield spoon the renault. The winifield does not visit the renault. The winifield overarch the derrek. If something is unprompted and it does not need the renault then the renault does not eat the winifield. If the renault is liplike and the renault overarch the derrek then the renault does not eat the winifield. If something spoon the renault then the renault does not eat the winifield. If something spoon the derrek then it is not digressive. If something baronetize the winifield and the winifield baronetize the renault then it is not liplike. If something baronetize the winifield then it spoon the derrek. If something spoon the renault then it baronetize the derrek. If something spoon the derrek and it baronetize the winifield then it is acidulous. The renault is unprompted.", "logic": "\nnot Baronetize(renault, derrek)\nUnprompted(renault)\nAcidulous(renault)\nSpoon(renault, derrek)\nSpoon(renault, winifield)\nOverarch(renault, winifield)\nBaronetize(derrek, winifield)\nOverarch(derrek, winifield)\nBaronetize(winifield, renault)\nBaronetize(winifield, derrek)\nLiplike(winifield)\nDigressive(winifield)\nAcidulous(winifield)\nSpoon(winifield, renault)\nnot Overarch(winifield, renault)\nOverarch(winifield, derrek)\nforall x (Unprompted(x) and not Spoon(x, renault) -> not Baronetize(renault, winifield))\nLiplike(renault) and Overarch(renault, derrek) -> not Baronetize(renault, winifield)\nforall x (Spoon(x, renault) -> not Baronetize(renault, winifield))\nforall x (Spoon(x, derrek) -> not Digressive(x))\nforall x (Baronetize(x, winifield) and Baronetize(winifield, renault) -> not Liplike(x))\nforall x (Baronetize(x, winifield) -> Spoon(x, derrek))\nforall x (Spoon(x, renault) -> Baronetize(x, derrek))\nforall x (Spoon(x, derrek) and Baronetize(x, winifield) -> Acidulous(x))\n\nUnprompted(renault)\n\ntherefore Unprompted(renault)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The gabey does not eat the kalle. The gabey is defendable. The gabey is satisfied. The gabey eternalise the kalle. The gabey eternalise the kalli. The gabey smatter the kalli. The kalle sashay the kalli. The kalle smatter the kalli. The kalli sashay the gabey. The kalli sashay the kalle. The kalli is frothing. The kalli is tertian. The kalli is satisfied. The kalli eternalise the gabey. The kalli does not visit the gabey. The kalli smatter the kalle. If something is defendable and it does not need the gabey then the gabey does not eat the kalli. If the gabey is frothing and the gabey smatter the kalle then the gabey does not eat the kalli. If something eternalise the gabey then the gabey does not eat the kalli. If something eternalise the kalle then it is not tertian. If something sashay the kalli and the kalli sashay the gabey then it is not frothing. If something sashay the kalli then it eternalise the kalle. If something eternalise the gabey then it sashay the kalle. If something eternalise the kalle and it sashay the kalli then it is satisfied. The gabey is not satisfied.", "logic": "\nnot Sashay(gabey, kalle)\nDefendable(gabey)\nSatisfied(gabey)\nEternalise(gabey, kalle)\nEternalise(gabey, kalli)\nSmatter(gabey, kalli)\nSashay(kalle, kalli)\nSmatter(kalle, kalli)\nSashay(kalli, gabey)\nSashay(kalli, kalle)\nFrothing(kalli)\nTertian(kalli)\nSatisfied(kalli)\nEternalise(kalli, gabey)\nnot Smatter(kalli, gabey)\nSmatter(kalli, kalle)\nforall x (Defendable(x) and not Eternalise(x, gabey) -> not Sashay(gabey, kalli))\nFrothing(gabey) and Smatter(gabey, kalle) -> not Sashay(gabey, kalli)\nforall x (Eternalise(x, gabey) -> not Sashay(gabey, kalli))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, kalle) -> not Tertian(x))\nforall x (Sashay(x, kalli) and Sashay(kalli, gabey) -> not Frothing(x))\nforall x (Sashay(x, kalli) -> Eternalise(x, kalle))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, gabey) -> Sashay(x, kalle))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, kalle) and Sashay(x, kalli) -> Satisfied(x))\n\nnot Satisfied(gabey)\n\ntherefore Satisfied(gabey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The alexi does not eat the celisse. The alexi is myelinated. The alexi is dusky. The alexi pollenate the celisse. The alexi pollenate the nathan. The alexi spook the nathan. The celisse upchuck the nathan. The celisse spook the nathan. The nathan upchuck the alexi. The nathan upchuck the celisse. The nathan is indigenous. The nathan is catty. The nathan is dusky. The nathan pollenate the alexi. The nathan does not visit the alexi. The nathan spook the celisse. If something is myelinated and it does not need the alexi then the alexi does not eat the nathan. If the alexi is indigenous and the alexi spook the celisse then the alexi does not eat the nathan. If something pollenate the alexi then the alexi does not eat the nathan. If something pollenate the celisse then it is not catty. If something upchuck the nathan and the nathan upchuck the alexi then it is not indigenous. If something upchuck the nathan then it pollenate the celisse. If something pollenate the alexi then it upchuck the celisse. If something pollenate the celisse and it upchuck the nathan then it is dusky. The celisse is not indigenous.", "logic": "\nnot Upchuck(alexi, celisse)\nMyelinated(alexi)\nDusky(alexi)\nPollenate(alexi, celisse)\nPollenate(alexi, nathan)\nSpook(alexi, nathan)\nUpchuck(celisse, nathan)\nSpook(celisse, nathan)\nUpchuck(nathan, alexi)\nUpchuck(nathan, celisse)\nIndigenous(nathan)\nCatty(nathan)\nDusky(nathan)\nPollenate(nathan, alexi)\nnot Spook(nathan, alexi)\nSpook(nathan, celisse)\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and not Pollenate(x, alexi) -> not Upchuck(alexi, nathan))\nIndigenous(alexi) and Spook(alexi, celisse) -> not Upchuck(alexi, nathan)\nforall x (Pollenate(x, alexi) -> not Upchuck(alexi, nathan))\nforall x (Pollenate(x, celisse) -> not Catty(x))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, nathan) and Upchuck(nathan, alexi) -> not Indigenous(x))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, nathan) -> Pollenate(x, celisse))\nforall x (Pollenate(x, alexi) -> Upchuck(x, celisse))\nforall x (Pollenate(x, celisse) and Upchuck(x, nathan) -> Dusky(x))\n\nnot Indigenous(celisse)\n\nUpchuck(celisse, nathan) and Upchuck(nathan, alexi) and forall x (Upchuck(x, nathan) and Upchuck(nathan, alexi) -> not Indigenous(x)) -> therefore not Indigenous(celisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The nevins does not eat the perle. The nevins is withered. The nevins is magenta. The nevins penetrate the perle. The nevins penetrate the fraser. The nevins elbow the fraser. The perle yearn the fraser. The perle elbow the fraser. The fraser yearn the nevins. The fraser yearn the perle. The fraser is huge. The fraser is allopathic. The fraser is magenta. The fraser penetrate the nevins. The fraser does not visit the nevins. The fraser elbow the perle. If something is withered and it does not need the nevins then the nevins does not eat the fraser. If the nevins is huge and the nevins elbow the perle then the nevins does not eat the fraser. If something penetrate the nevins then the nevins does not eat the fraser. If something penetrate the perle then it is not allopathic. If something yearn the fraser and the fraser yearn the nevins then it is not huge. If something yearn the fraser then it penetrate the perle. If something penetrate the nevins then it yearn the perle. If something penetrate the perle and it yearn the fraser then it is magenta. The perle is huge.", "logic": "\nnot Yearn(nevins, perle)\nWithered(nevins)\nMagenta(nevins)\nPenetrate(nevins, perle)\nPenetrate(nevins, fraser)\nElbow(nevins, fraser)\nYearn(perle, fraser)\nElbow(perle, fraser)\nYearn(fraser, nevins)\nYearn(fraser, perle)\nHuge(fraser)\nAllopathic(fraser)\nMagenta(fraser)\nPenetrate(fraser, nevins)\nnot Elbow(fraser, nevins)\nElbow(fraser, perle)\nforall x (Withered(x) and not Penetrate(x, nevins) -> not Yearn(nevins, fraser))\nHuge(nevins) and Elbow(nevins, perle) -> not Yearn(nevins, fraser)\nforall x (Penetrate(x, nevins) -> not Yearn(nevins, fraser))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, perle) -> not Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Yearn(x, fraser) and Yearn(fraser, nevins) -> not Huge(x))\nforall x (Yearn(x, fraser) -> Penetrate(x, perle))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, nevins) -> Yearn(x, perle))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, perle) and Yearn(x, fraser) -> Magenta(x))\n\nHuge(perle)\n\nYearn(perle, fraser) and Yearn(fraser, nevins) and forall x (Yearn(x, fraser) and Yearn(fraser, nevins) -> not Huge(x)) -> therefore not Huge(perle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The vale does not eat the spence. The vale is downbound. The vale is filial. The vale eavesdrop the spence. The vale eavesdrop the gabbi. The vale hype the gabbi. The spence swank the gabbi. The spence hype the gabbi. The gabbi swank the vale. The gabbi swank the spence. The gabbi is impacted. The gabbi is elysian. The gabbi is filial. The gabbi eavesdrop the vale. The gabbi does not visit the vale. The gabbi hype the spence. If something is downbound and it does not need the vale then the vale does not eat the gabbi. If the vale is impacted and the vale hype the spence then the vale does not eat the gabbi. If something eavesdrop the vale then the vale does not eat the gabbi. If something eavesdrop the spence then it is not elysian. If something swank the gabbi and the gabbi swank the vale then it is not impacted. If something swank the gabbi then it eavesdrop the spence. If something eavesdrop the vale then it swank the spence. If something eavesdrop the spence and it swank the gabbi then it is filial. The spence is filial.", "logic": "\nnot Swank(vale, spence)\nDownbound(vale)\nFilial(vale)\nEavesdrop(vale, spence)\nEavesdrop(vale, gabbi)\nHype(vale, gabbi)\nSwank(spence, gabbi)\nHype(spence, gabbi)\nSwank(gabbi, vale)\nSwank(gabbi, spence)\nImpacted(gabbi)\nElysian(gabbi)\nFilial(gabbi)\nEavesdrop(gabbi, vale)\nnot Hype(gabbi, vale)\nHype(gabbi, spence)\nforall x (Downbound(x) and not Eavesdrop(x, vale) -> not Swank(vale, gabbi))\nImpacted(vale) and Hype(vale, spence) -> not Swank(vale, gabbi)\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, vale) -> not Swank(vale, gabbi))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, spence) -> not Elysian(x))\nforall x (Swank(x, gabbi) and Swank(gabbi, vale) -> not Impacted(x))\nforall x (Swank(x, gabbi) -> Eavesdrop(x, spence))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, vale) -> Swank(x, spence))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, spence) and Swank(x, gabbi) -> Filial(x))\n\nFilial(spence)\n\nSwank(spence, gabbi) and forall x (Swank(x, gabbi) -> Eavesdrop(x, spence)) -> therefore Eavesdrop(spence, spence) Eavesdrop(spence, spence) and Swank(spence, gabbi) and forall x (Eavesdrop(x, spence) and Swank(x, gabbi) -> Filial(x)) -> therefore Filial(spence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The ephrem does not eat the cammy. The ephrem is fictional. The ephrem is married. The ephrem gibbet the cammy. The ephrem gibbet the orin. The ephrem mine the orin. The cammy slobber the orin. The cammy mine the orin. The orin slobber the ephrem. The orin slobber the cammy. The orin is seriocomic. The orin is resistible. The orin is married. The orin gibbet the ephrem. The orin does not visit the ephrem. The orin mine the cammy. If something is fictional and it does not need the ephrem then the ephrem does not eat the orin. If the ephrem is seriocomic and the ephrem mine the cammy then the ephrem does not eat the orin. If something gibbet the ephrem then the ephrem does not eat the orin. If something gibbet the cammy then it is not resistible. If something slobber the orin and the orin slobber the ephrem then it is not seriocomic. If something slobber the orin then it gibbet the cammy. If something gibbet the ephrem then it slobber the cammy. If something gibbet the cammy and it slobber the orin then it is married. The cammy is resistible.", "logic": "\nnot Slobber(ephrem, cammy)\nFictional(ephrem)\nMarried(ephrem)\nGibbet(ephrem, cammy)\nGibbet(ephrem, orin)\nMine(ephrem, orin)\nSlobber(cammy, orin)\nMine(cammy, orin)\nSlobber(orin, ephrem)\nSlobber(orin, cammy)\nSeriocomic(orin)\nResistible(orin)\nMarried(orin)\nGibbet(orin, ephrem)\nnot Mine(orin, ephrem)\nMine(orin, cammy)\nforall x (Fictional(x) and not Gibbet(x, ephrem) -> not Slobber(ephrem, orin))\nSeriocomic(ephrem) and Mine(ephrem, cammy) -> not Slobber(ephrem, orin)\nforall x (Gibbet(x, ephrem) -> not Slobber(ephrem, orin))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, cammy) -> not Resistible(x))\nforall x (Slobber(x, orin) and Slobber(orin, ephrem) -> not Seriocomic(x))\nforall x (Slobber(x, orin) -> Gibbet(x, cammy))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, ephrem) -> Slobber(x, cammy))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, cammy) and Slobber(x, orin) -> Married(x))\n\nResistible(cammy)\n\nSlobber(cammy, orin) and forall x (Slobber(x, orin) -> Gibbet(x, cammy)) -> therefore Gibbet(cammy, cammy) Gibbet(cammy, cammy) and forall x (Gibbet(x, cammy) -> not Resistible(x)) -> therefore not Resistible(cammy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The austin does not eat the isabeau. The austin is punishable. The austin is plutonic. The austin bean the isabeau. The austin bean the jef. The austin neighbour the jef. The isabeau amerce the jef. The isabeau neighbour the jef. The jef amerce the austin. The jef amerce the isabeau. The jef is governing. The jef is such. The jef is plutonic. The jef bean the austin. The jef does not visit the austin. The jef neighbour the isabeau. If something is punishable and it does not need the austin then the austin does not eat the jef. If the austin is governing and the austin neighbour the isabeau then the austin does not eat the jef. If something bean the austin then the austin does not eat the jef. If something bean the isabeau then it is not such. If something amerce the jef and the jef amerce the austin then it is not governing. If something amerce the jef then it bean the isabeau. If something bean the austin then it amerce the isabeau. If something bean the isabeau and it amerce the jef then it is plutonic. The isabeau does not eat the isabeau.", "logic": "\nnot Amerce(austin, isabeau)\nPunishable(austin)\nPlutonic(austin)\nBean(austin, isabeau)\nBean(austin, jef)\nNeighbour(austin, jef)\nAmerce(isabeau, jef)\nNeighbour(isabeau, jef)\nAmerce(jef, austin)\nAmerce(jef, isabeau)\nGoverning(jef)\nSuch(jef)\nPlutonic(jef)\nBean(jef, austin)\nnot Neighbour(jef, austin)\nNeighbour(jef, isabeau)\nforall x (Punishable(x) and not Bean(x, austin) -> not Amerce(austin, jef))\nGoverning(austin) and Neighbour(austin, isabeau) -> not Amerce(austin, jef)\nforall x (Bean(x, austin) -> not Amerce(austin, jef))\nforall x (Bean(x, isabeau) -> not Such(x))\nforall x (Amerce(x, jef) and Amerce(jef, austin) -> not Governing(x))\nforall x (Amerce(x, jef) -> Bean(x, isabeau))\nforall x (Bean(x, austin) -> Amerce(x, isabeau))\nforall x (Bean(x, isabeau) and Amerce(x, jef) -> Plutonic(x))\n\nnot Amerce(isabeau, isabeau)\n\nforall x (Bean(x, austin) -> Amerce(x, isabeau)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The corny does not eat the gilles. The corny is barbarian. The corny is bulbous. The corny equip the gilles. The corny equip the kaia. The corny filtrate the kaia. The gilles chew the kaia. The gilles filtrate the kaia. The kaia chew the corny. The kaia chew the gilles. The kaia is hyperemic. The kaia is neuronal. The kaia is bulbous. The kaia equip the corny. The kaia does not visit the corny. The kaia filtrate the gilles. If something is barbarian and it does not need the corny then the corny does not eat the kaia. If the corny is hyperemic and the corny filtrate the gilles then the corny does not eat the kaia. If something equip the corny then the corny does not eat the kaia. If something equip the gilles then it is not neuronal. If something chew the kaia and the kaia chew the corny then it is not hyperemic. If something chew the kaia then it equip the gilles. If something equip the corny then it chew the gilles. If something equip the gilles and it chew the kaia then it is bulbous. The kaia equip the gilles.", "logic": "\nnot Chew(corny, gilles)\nBarbarian(corny)\nBulbous(corny)\nEquip(corny, gilles)\nEquip(corny, kaia)\nFiltrate(corny, kaia)\nChew(gilles, kaia)\nFiltrate(gilles, kaia)\nChew(kaia, corny)\nChew(kaia, gilles)\nHyperemic(kaia)\nNeuronal(kaia)\nBulbous(kaia)\nEquip(kaia, corny)\nnot Filtrate(kaia, corny)\nFiltrate(kaia, gilles)\nforall x (Barbarian(x) and not Equip(x, corny) -> not Chew(corny, kaia))\nHyperemic(corny) and Filtrate(corny, gilles) -> not Chew(corny, kaia)\nforall x (Equip(x, corny) -> not Chew(corny, kaia))\nforall x (Equip(x, gilles) -> not Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Chew(x, kaia) and Chew(kaia, corny) -> not Hyperemic(x))\nforall x (Chew(x, kaia) -> Equip(x, gilles))\nforall x (Equip(x, corny) -> Chew(x, gilles))\nforall x (Equip(x, gilles) and Chew(x, kaia) -> Bulbous(x))\n\nEquip(kaia, gilles)\n\nforall x (Chew(x, kaia) -> Equip(x, gilles)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The istvan does not eat the jud. The istvan is shocked. The istvan is speckled. The istvan shill the jud. The istvan shill the rosaleen. The istvan jibe the rosaleen. The jud knell the rosaleen. The jud jibe the rosaleen. The rosaleen knell the istvan. The rosaleen knell the jud. The rosaleen is abstruse. The rosaleen is hinder. The rosaleen is speckled. The rosaleen shill the istvan. The rosaleen does not visit the istvan. The rosaleen jibe the jud. If something is shocked and it does not need the istvan then the istvan does not eat the rosaleen. If the istvan is abstruse and the istvan jibe the jud then the istvan does not eat the rosaleen. If something shill the istvan then the istvan does not eat the rosaleen. If something shill the jud then it is not hinder. If something knell the rosaleen and the rosaleen knell the istvan then it is not abstruse. If something knell the rosaleen then it shill the jud. If something shill the istvan then it knell the jud. If something shill the jud and it knell the rosaleen then it is speckled. The jud does not need the rosaleen.", "logic": "\nnot Knell(istvan, jud)\nShocked(istvan)\nSpeckled(istvan)\nShill(istvan, jud)\nShill(istvan, rosaleen)\nJibe(istvan, rosaleen)\nKnell(jud, rosaleen)\nJibe(jud, rosaleen)\nKnell(rosaleen, istvan)\nKnell(rosaleen, jud)\nAbstruse(rosaleen)\nHinder(rosaleen)\nSpeckled(rosaleen)\nShill(rosaleen, istvan)\nnot Jibe(rosaleen, istvan)\nJibe(rosaleen, jud)\nforall x (Shocked(x) and not Shill(x, istvan) -> not Knell(istvan, rosaleen))\nAbstruse(istvan) and Jibe(istvan, jud) -> not Knell(istvan, rosaleen)\nforall x (Shill(x, istvan) -> not Knell(istvan, rosaleen))\nforall x (Shill(x, jud) -> not Hinder(x))\nforall x (Knell(x, rosaleen) and Knell(rosaleen, istvan) -> not Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Knell(x, rosaleen) -> Shill(x, jud))\nforall x (Shill(x, istvan) -> Knell(x, jud))\nforall x (Shill(x, jud) and Knell(x, rosaleen) -> Speckled(x))\n\nnot Shill(jud, rosaleen)\n\nnot Shill(jud, rosaleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The robinet does not eat the malcolm. The robinet is missional. The robinet is boytrose. The robinet undersign the malcolm. The robinet undersign the aimil. The robinet round the aimil. The malcolm speed the aimil. The malcolm round the aimil. The aimil speed the robinet. The aimil speed the malcolm. The aimil is nippy. The aimil is gracile. The aimil is boytrose. The aimil undersign the robinet. The aimil does not visit the robinet. The aimil round the malcolm. If something is missional and it does not need the robinet then the robinet does not eat the aimil. If the robinet is nippy and the robinet round the malcolm then the robinet does not eat the aimil. If something undersign the robinet then the robinet does not eat the aimil. If something undersign the malcolm then it is not gracile. If something speed the aimil and the aimil speed the robinet then it is not nippy. If something speed the aimil then it undersign the malcolm. If something undersign the robinet then it speed the malcolm. If something undersign the malcolm and it speed the aimil then it is boytrose. The malcolm round the malcolm.", "logic": "\nnot Speed(robinet, malcolm)\nMissional(robinet)\nBoytrose(robinet)\nUndersign(robinet, malcolm)\nUndersign(robinet, aimil)\nRound(robinet, aimil)\nSpeed(malcolm, aimil)\nRound(malcolm, aimil)\nSpeed(aimil, robinet)\nSpeed(aimil, malcolm)\nNippy(aimil)\nGracile(aimil)\nBoytrose(aimil)\nUndersign(aimil, robinet)\nnot Round(aimil, robinet)\nRound(aimil, malcolm)\nforall x (Missional(x) and not Undersign(x, robinet) -> not Speed(robinet, aimil))\nNippy(robinet) and Round(robinet, malcolm) -> not Speed(robinet, aimil)\nforall x (Undersign(x, robinet) -> not Speed(robinet, aimil))\nforall x (Undersign(x, malcolm) -> not Gracile(x))\nforall x (Speed(x, aimil) and Speed(aimil, robinet) -> not Nippy(x))\nforall x (Speed(x, aimil) -> Undersign(x, malcolm))\nforall x (Undersign(x, robinet) -> Speed(x, malcolm))\nforall x (Undersign(x, malcolm) and Speed(x, aimil) -> Boytrose(x))\n\nRound(malcolm, malcolm)\n\nRound(malcolm, malcolm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The ignatius does not eat the alfonzo. The ignatius is exempt. The ignatius is farsighted. The ignatius fecundate the alfonzo. The ignatius fecundate the toddie. The ignatius excavate the toddie. The alfonzo gauge the toddie. The alfonzo excavate the toddie. The toddie gauge the ignatius. The toddie gauge the alfonzo. The toddie is sensitised. The toddie is suburban. The toddie is farsighted. The toddie fecundate the ignatius. The toddie does not visit the ignatius. The toddie excavate the alfonzo. If something is exempt and it does not need the ignatius then the ignatius does not eat the toddie. If the ignatius is sensitised and the ignatius excavate the alfonzo then the ignatius does not eat the toddie. If something fecundate the ignatius then the ignatius does not eat the toddie. If something fecundate the alfonzo then it is not suburban. If something gauge the toddie and the toddie gauge the ignatius then it is not sensitised. If something gauge the toddie then it fecundate the alfonzo. If something fecundate the ignatius then it gauge the alfonzo. If something fecundate the alfonzo and it gauge the toddie then it is farsighted. The alfonzo is not exempt.", "logic": "\nnot Gauge(ignatius, alfonzo)\nExempt(ignatius)\nFarsighted(ignatius)\nFecundate(ignatius, alfonzo)\nFecundate(ignatius, toddie)\nExcavate(ignatius, toddie)\nGauge(alfonzo, toddie)\nExcavate(alfonzo, toddie)\nGauge(toddie, ignatius)\nGauge(toddie, alfonzo)\nSensitised(toddie)\nSuburban(toddie)\nFarsighted(toddie)\nFecundate(toddie, ignatius)\nnot Excavate(toddie, ignatius)\nExcavate(toddie, alfonzo)\nforall x (Exempt(x) and not Fecundate(x, ignatius) -> not Gauge(ignatius, toddie))\nSensitised(ignatius) and Excavate(ignatius, alfonzo) -> not Gauge(ignatius, toddie)\nforall x (Fecundate(x, ignatius) -> not Gauge(ignatius, toddie))\nforall x (Fecundate(x, alfonzo) -> not Suburban(x))\nforall x (Gauge(x, toddie) and Gauge(toddie, ignatius) -> not Sensitised(x))\nforall x (Gauge(x, toddie) -> Fecundate(x, alfonzo))\nforall x (Fecundate(x, ignatius) -> Gauge(x, alfonzo))\nforall x (Fecundate(x, alfonzo) and Gauge(x, toddie) -> Farsighted(x))\n\nnot Exempt(alfonzo)\n\nnot Exempt(alfonzo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The hussein does not eat the dorie. The hussein is keeled. The hussein is chartreuse. The hussein virilise the dorie. The hussein virilise the corene. The hussein bereave the corene. The dorie samba the corene. The dorie bereave the corene. The corene samba the hussein. The corene samba the dorie. The corene is bermudan. The corene is dressed. The corene is chartreuse. The corene virilise the hussein. The corene does not visit the hussein. The corene bereave the dorie. If something is keeled and it does not need the hussein then the hussein does not eat the corene. If the hussein is bermudan and the hussein bereave the dorie then the hussein does not eat the corene. If something virilise the hussein then the hussein does not eat the corene. If something virilise the dorie then it is not dressed. If something samba the corene and the corene samba the hussein then it is not bermudan. If something samba the corene then it virilise the dorie. If something virilise the hussein then it samba the dorie. If something virilise the dorie and it samba the corene then it is chartreuse. The hussein samba the hussein.", "logic": "\nnot Samba(hussein, dorie)\nKeeled(hussein)\nChartreuse(hussein)\nVirilise(hussein, dorie)\nVirilise(hussein, corene)\nBereave(hussein, corene)\nSamba(dorie, corene)\nBereave(dorie, corene)\nSamba(corene, hussein)\nSamba(corene, dorie)\nBermudan(corene)\nDressed(corene)\nChartreuse(corene)\nVirilise(corene, hussein)\nnot Bereave(corene, hussein)\nBereave(corene, dorie)\nforall x (Keeled(x) and not Virilise(x, hussein) -> not Samba(hussein, corene))\nBermudan(hussein) and Bereave(hussein, dorie) -> not Samba(hussein, corene)\nforall x (Virilise(x, hussein) -> not Samba(hussein, corene))\nforall x (Virilise(x, dorie) -> not Dressed(x))\nforall x (Samba(x, corene) and Samba(corene, hussein) -> not Bermudan(x))\nforall x (Samba(x, corene) -> Virilise(x, dorie))\nforall x (Virilise(x, hussein) -> Samba(x, dorie))\nforall x (Virilise(x, dorie) and Samba(x, corene) -> Chartreuse(x))\n\nSamba(hussein, hussein)\n\nSamba(hussein, hussein) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Armstrong is oscine. Armstrong is gummed. Polly is catoptric. Polly is wavering. Byram is catoptric. Nanci is starting. Nanci is gummed. If something is xlvii then it is not gummed. All starting, wavering things are not socratic. If something is xlvii and not gummed then it is oscine. If something is xlvii and not gummed then it is catoptric. If something is oscine and not xlvii then it is catoptric. If something is gummed then it is catoptric. All catoptric things are wavering. If something is catoptric and not gummed then it is wavering. Armstrong is gummed.", "logic": "\nOscine(armstrong)\nGummed(armstrong)\nCatoptric(polly)\nWavering(polly)\nCatoptric(byram)\nStarting(nanci)\nGummed(nanci)\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> not Gummed(x))\nforall x (Starting(x) and Wavering(x) -> not Socratic(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and not Gummed(x) -> Oscine(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and not Gummed(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) and not Xlvii(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Catoptric(x) -> Wavering(x))\nforall x (Catoptric(x) and not Gummed(x) -> Wavering(x))\n\nGummed(armstrong)\n\ntherefore Gummed(armstrong)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Adolph is contraband. Adolph is unsexy. Beale is russet. Beale is epochal. Emmery is russet. Carolee is normative. Carolee is unsexy. If something is taxing then it is not unsexy. All normative, epochal things are not unoccupied. If something is taxing and not unsexy then it is contraband. If something is taxing and not unsexy then it is russet. If something is contraband and not taxing then it is russet. If something is unsexy then it is russet. All russet things are epochal. If something is russet and not unsexy then it is epochal. Beale is not russet.", "logic": "\nContraband(adolph)\nUnsexy(adolph)\nRusset(beale)\nEpochal(beale)\nRusset(emmery)\nNormative(carolee)\nUnsexy(carolee)\nforall x (Taxing(x) -> not Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Normative(x) and Epochal(x) -> not Unoccupied(x))\nforall x (Taxing(x) and not Unsexy(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Taxing(x) and not Unsexy(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) and not Taxing(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Russet(x) -> Epochal(x))\nforall x (Russet(x) and not Unsexy(x) -> Epochal(x))\n\nnot Russet(beale)\n\ntherefore Russet(beale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Waine is netted. Waine is missed. Penni is sumptuous. Penni is habitual. Piggy is sumptuous. Robbin is mortal. Robbin is missed. If something is startled then it is not missed. All mortal, habitual things are not bedimmed. If something is startled and not missed then it is netted. If something is startled and not missed then it is sumptuous. If something is netted and not startled then it is sumptuous. If something is missed then it is sumptuous. All sumptuous things are habitual. If something is sumptuous and not missed then it is habitual. Robbin is sumptuous.", "logic": "\nNetted(waine)\nMissed(waine)\nSumptuous(penni)\nHabitual(penni)\nSumptuous(piggy)\nMortal(robbin)\nMissed(robbin)\nforall x (Startled(x) -> not Missed(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) and Habitual(x) -> not Bedimmed(x))\nforall x (Startled(x) and not Missed(x) -> Netted(x))\nforall x (Startled(x) and not Missed(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Netted(x) and not Startled(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Missed(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Habitual(x))\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) and not Missed(x) -> Habitual(x))\n\nSumptuous(robbin)\n\nMissed(robbin) and forall x (Missed(x) -> Sumptuous(x)) -> therefore Sumptuous(robbin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Clinten is shameful. Clinten is bulky. Sophey is midget. Sophey is supreme. Wilmer is midget. Rhiamon is pomaded. Rhiamon is bulky. If something is interior then it is not bulky. All pomaded, supreme things are not disarrayed. If something is interior and not bulky then it is shameful. If something is interior and not bulky then it is midget. If something is shameful and not interior then it is midget. If something is bulky then it is midget. All midget things are supreme. If something is midget and not bulky then it is supreme. Clinten is not midget.", "logic": "\nShameful(clinten)\nBulky(clinten)\nMidget(sophey)\nSupreme(sophey)\nMidget(wilmer)\nPomaded(rhiamon)\nBulky(rhiamon)\nforall x (Interior(x) -> not Bulky(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) and Supreme(x) -> not Disarrayed(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and not Bulky(x) -> Shameful(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and not Bulky(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Shameful(x) and not Interior(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Bulky(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) -> Supreme(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) and not Bulky(x) -> Supreme(x))\n\nnot Midget(clinten)\n\nBulky(clinten) and forall x (Bulky(x) -> Midget(x)) -> therefore Midget(clinten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Abner is aurorean. Abner is sustained. Georgia is unkept. Georgia is huddled. Tana is unkept. Deane is orgiastic. Deane is sustained. If something is spongelike then it is not sustained. All orgiastic, huddled things are not public. If something is spongelike and not sustained then it is aurorean. If something is spongelike and not sustained then it is unkept. If something is aurorean and not spongelike then it is unkept. If something is sustained then it is unkept. All unkept things are huddled. If something is unkept and not sustained then it is huddled. Deane is huddled.", "logic": "\nAurorean(abner)\nSustained(abner)\nUnkept(georgia)\nHuddled(georgia)\nUnkept(tana)\nOrgiastic(deane)\nSustained(deane)\nforall x (Spongelike(x) -> not Sustained(x))\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) and Huddled(x) -> not Public(x))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) and not Sustained(x) -> Aurorean(x))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) and not Sustained(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) and not Spongelike(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Sustained(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) and not Sustained(x) -> Huddled(x))\n\nHuddled(deane)\n\nSustained(deane) and forall x (Sustained(x) -> Unkept(x)) -> therefore Unkept(deane) Unkept(deane) and forall x (Unkept(x) -> Huddled(x)) -> therefore Huddled(deane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Remy is bullying. Remy is strep. Jami is bosomy. Jami is amusive. Mona is bosomy. Hersh is domed. Hersh is strep. If something is unrhymed then it is not strep. All domed, amusive things are not daring. If something is unrhymed and not strep then it is bullying. If something is unrhymed and not strep then it is bosomy. If something is bullying and not unrhymed then it is bosomy. If something is strep then it is bosomy. All bosomy things are amusive. If something is bosomy and not strep then it is amusive. Hersh is not amusive.", "logic": "\nBullying(remy)\nStrep(remy)\nBosomy(jami)\nAmusive(jami)\nBosomy(mona)\nDomed(hersh)\nStrep(hersh)\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) -> not Strep(x))\nforall x (Domed(x) and Amusive(x) -> not Daring(x))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and not Strep(x) -> Bullying(x))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and not Strep(x) -> Bosomy(x))\nforall x (Bullying(x) and not Unrhymed(x) -> Bosomy(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Bosomy(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) -> Amusive(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and not Strep(x) -> Amusive(x))\n\nnot Amusive(hersh)\n\nStrep(hersh) and forall x (Strep(x) -> Bosomy(x)) -> therefore Bosomy(hersh) Bosomy(hersh) and forall x (Bosomy(x) -> Amusive(x)) -> therefore Amusive(hersh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Sheilah is supernal. Sheilah is sliced. Rivalee is articled. Rivalee is lovesick. Andra is articled. Carrie is teachable. Carrie is sliced. If something is plentiful then it is not sliced. All teachable, lovesick things are not riemannian. If something is plentiful and not sliced then it is supernal. If something is plentiful and not sliced then it is articled. If something is supernal and not plentiful then it is articled. If something is sliced then it is articled. All articled things are lovesick. If something is articled and not sliced then it is lovesick. Andra is not supernal.", "logic": "\nSupernal(sheilah)\nSliced(sheilah)\nArticled(rivalee)\nLovesick(rivalee)\nArticled(andra)\nTeachable(carrie)\nSliced(carrie)\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> not Sliced(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) and Lovesick(x) -> not Riemannian(x))\nforall x (Plentiful(x) and not Sliced(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Plentiful(x) and not Sliced(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Supernal(x) and not Plentiful(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Sliced(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Lovesick(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) and not Sliced(x) -> Lovesick(x))\n\nnot Supernal(andra)\n\nforall x (Plentiful(x) and not Sliced(x) -> Supernal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Jermain is further. Jermain is pareve. Stoddard is immobile. Stoddard is worse. Lotti is immobile. Greg is positivist. Greg is pareve. If something is talky then it is not pareve. All positivist, worse things are not beloved. If something is talky and not pareve then it is further. If something is talky and not pareve then it is immobile. If something is further and not talky then it is immobile. If something is pareve then it is immobile. All immobile things are worse. If something is immobile and not pareve then it is worse. Stoddard is further.", "logic": "\nFurther(jermain)\nPareve(jermain)\nImmobile(stoddard)\nWorse(stoddard)\nImmobile(lotti)\nPositivist(greg)\nPareve(greg)\nforall x (Talky(x) -> not Pareve(x))\nforall x (Positivist(x) and Worse(x) -> not Beloved(x))\nforall x (Talky(x) and not Pareve(x) -> Further(x))\nforall x (Talky(x) and not Pareve(x) -> Immobile(x))\nforall x (Further(x) and not Talky(x) -> Immobile(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Immobile(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) -> Worse(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) and not Pareve(x) -> Worse(x))\n\nFurther(stoddard)\n\nforall x (Talky(x) and not Pareve(x) -> Further(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Yoko is botryoidal. Yoko is hebdomadal. Maisie is immutable. Maisie is shuha. Aimee is immutable. Sib is empyreal. Sib is hebdomadal. If something is negotiable then it is not hebdomadal. All empyreal, shuha things are not unwaxed. If something is negotiable and not hebdomadal then it is botryoidal. If something is negotiable and not hebdomadal then it is immutable. If something is botryoidal and not negotiable then it is immutable. If something is hebdomadal then it is immutable. All immutable things are shuha. If something is immutable and not hebdomadal then it is shuha. Sib is not botryoidal.", "logic": "\nBotryoidal(yoko)\nHebdomadal(yoko)\nImmutable(maisie)\nShuha(maisie)\nImmutable(aimee)\nEmpyreal(sib)\nHebdomadal(sib)\nforall x (Negotiable(x) -> not Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Empyreal(x) and Shuha(x) -> not Unwaxed(x))\nforall x (Negotiable(x) and not Hebdomadal(x) -> Botryoidal(x))\nforall x (Negotiable(x) and not Hebdomadal(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Botryoidal(x) and not Negotiable(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Shuha(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) and not Hebdomadal(x) -> Shuha(x))\n\nnot Botryoidal(sib)\n\nforall x (Negotiable(x) and not Hebdomadal(x) -> Botryoidal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Florry is autogenous. Florry is protean. Keriann is idiotic. Keriann is informal. Lorrayne is idiotic. Dyson is packed. Dyson is protean. If something is multicolor then it is not protean. All packed, informal things are not feverous. If something is multicolor and not protean then it is autogenous. If something is multicolor and not protean then it is idiotic. If something is autogenous and not multicolor then it is idiotic. If something is protean then it is idiotic. All idiotic things are informal. If something is idiotic and not protean then it is informal. Keriann is protean.", "logic": "\nAutogenous(florry)\nProtean(florry)\nIdiotic(keriann)\nInformal(keriann)\nIdiotic(lorrayne)\nPacked(dyson)\nProtean(dyson)\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> not Protean(x))\nforall x (Packed(x) and Informal(x) -> not Feverous(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) and not Protean(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) and not Protean(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Autogenous(x) and not Multicolor(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Idiotic(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Idiotic(x) and not Protean(x) -> Informal(x))\n\nProtean(keriann)\n\nProtean(keriann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Dennie is bashful. Dennie is blubbery. Patience is descending. Patience is acceptive. Olin is descending. Baxter is eastbound. Baxter is blubbery. If something is flyblown then it is not blubbery. All eastbound, acceptive things are not human. If something is flyblown and not blubbery then it is bashful. If something is flyblown and not blubbery then it is descending. If something is bashful and not flyblown then it is descending. If something is blubbery then it is descending. All descending things are acceptive. If something is descending and not blubbery then it is acceptive. Dennie is not eastbound.", "logic": "\nBashful(dennie)\nBlubbery(dennie)\nDescending(patience)\nAcceptive(patience)\nDescending(olin)\nEastbound(baxter)\nBlubbery(baxter)\nforall x (Flyblown(x) -> not Blubbery(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) and Acceptive(x) -> not Human(x))\nforall x (Flyblown(x) and not Blubbery(x) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Flyblown(x) and not Blubbery(x) -> Descending(x))\nforall x (Bashful(x) and not Flyblown(x) -> Descending(x))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Descending(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) -> Acceptive(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) and not Blubbery(x) -> Acceptive(x))\n\nnot Eastbound(dennie)\n\nnot Eastbound(dennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Konstanze is voluntary. Konstanze is borated. Andrej is alto. Andrej is allogamous. Thorstein is alto. Annabell is ampullar. Annabell is borated. If something is ecumenical then it is not borated. All ampullar, allogamous things are not toupeed. If something is ecumenical and not borated then it is voluntary. If something is ecumenical and not borated then it is alto. If something is voluntary and not ecumenical then it is alto. If something is borated then it is alto. All alto things are allogamous. If something is alto and not borated then it is allogamous. Thorstein is borated.", "logic": "\nVoluntary(konstanze)\nBorated(konstanze)\nAlto(andrej)\nAllogamous(andrej)\nAlto(thorstein)\nAmpullar(annabell)\nBorated(annabell)\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) -> not Borated(x))\nforall x (Ampullar(x) and Allogamous(x) -> not Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) and not Borated(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) and not Borated(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) and not Ecumenical(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Borated(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) and not Borated(x) -> Allogamous(x))\n\nBorated(thorstein)\n\nBorated(thorstein) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2221"} {"premises": "Marcella is boring. Marcella is goodish. Marcella is shocking. Marcella is colombian. Marcella is anabiotic. Marcella is shorn. Valery is boring. Valery is goodish. Valery is shocking. Valery is shorn. If something is boring then it is colombian. If something is shocking and colombian then it is anabiotic. Valery is shorn.", "logic": "\nBoring(marcella)\nGoodish(marcella)\nShocking(marcella)\nColombian(marcella)\nAnabiotic(marcella)\nShorn(marcella)\nBoring(valery)\nGoodish(valery)\nShocking(valery)\nShorn(valery)\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Colombian(x))\nforall x (Shocking(x) and Colombian(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\n\nShorn(valery)\n\ntherefore Shorn(valery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Norene is patient. Norene is stereo. Norene is conformist. Norene is overall. Norene is caucasian. Norene is quotable. Katine is patient. Katine is stereo. Katine is conformist. Katine is quotable. If something is patient then it is overall. If something is conformist and overall then it is caucasian. Katine is not patient.", "logic": "\nPatient(norene)\nStereo(norene)\nConformist(norene)\nOverall(norene)\nCaucasian(norene)\nQuotable(norene)\nPatient(katine)\nStereo(katine)\nConformist(katine)\nQuotable(katine)\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Overall(x))\nforall x (Conformist(x) and Overall(x) -> Caucasian(x))\n\nnot Patient(katine)\n\ntherefore Patient(katine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Karrie is petalled. Karrie is cliquish. Karrie is brunette. Karrie is patristic. Karrie is reddish. Karrie is recursive. Jemimah is petalled. Jemimah is cliquish. Jemimah is brunette. Jemimah is recursive. If something is petalled then it is patristic. If something is brunette and patristic then it is reddish. Jemimah is patristic.", "logic": "\nPetalled(karrie)\nCliquish(karrie)\nBrunette(karrie)\nPatristic(karrie)\nReddish(karrie)\nRecursive(karrie)\nPetalled(jemimah)\nCliquish(jemimah)\nBrunette(jemimah)\nRecursive(jemimah)\nforall x (Petalled(x) -> Patristic(x))\nforall x (Brunette(x) and Patristic(x) -> Reddish(x))\n\nPatristic(jemimah)\n\nPetalled(jemimah) and forall x (Petalled(x) -> Patristic(x)) -> therefore Patristic(jemimah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Brant is avestan. Brant is susurrous. Brant is ribless. Brant is excusable. Brant is circadian. Brant is araneidal. Vonnie is avestan. Vonnie is susurrous. Vonnie is ribless. Vonnie is araneidal. If something is avestan then it is excusable. If something is ribless and excusable then it is circadian. Vonnie is not excusable.", "logic": "\nAvestan(brant)\nSusurrous(brant)\nRibless(brant)\nExcusable(brant)\nCircadian(brant)\nAraneidal(brant)\nAvestan(vonnie)\nSusurrous(vonnie)\nRibless(vonnie)\nAraneidal(vonnie)\nforall x (Avestan(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Excusable(x) -> Circadian(x))\n\nnot Excusable(vonnie)\n\nAvestan(vonnie) and forall x (Avestan(x) -> Excusable(x)) -> therefore Excusable(vonnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Lemmie is minimalist. Lemmie is hydric. Lemmie is wearable. Lemmie is noble. Lemmie is shinto. Lemmie is aggressive. Orelia is minimalist. Orelia is hydric. Orelia is wearable. Orelia is aggressive. If something is minimalist then it is noble. If something is wearable and noble then it is shinto. Orelia is shinto.", "logic": "\nMinimalist(lemmie)\nHydric(lemmie)\nWearable(lemmie)\nNoble(lemmie)\nShinto(lemmie)\nAggressive(lemmie)\nMinimalist(orelia)\nHydric(orelia)\nWearable(orelia)\nAggressive(orelia)\nforall x (Minimalist(x) -> Noble(x))\nforall x (Wearable(x) and Noble(x) -> Shinto(x))\n\nShinto(orelia)\n\nMinimalist(orelia) and forall x (Minimalist(x) -> Noble(x)) -> therefore Noble(orelia) Wearable(orelia) and Noble(orelia) and forall x (Wearable(x) and Noble(x) -> Shinto(x)) -> therefore Shinto(orelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Pasquale is varying. Pasquale is historical. Pasquale is beat. Pasquale is outrageous. Pasquale is twisty. Pasquale is converted. Aube is varying. Aube is historical. Aube is beat. Aube is converted. If something is varying then it is outrageous. If something is beat and outrageous then it is twisty. Aube is not twisty.", "logic": "\nVarying(pasquale)\nHistorical(pasquale)\nBeat(pasquale)\nOutrageous(pasquale)\nTwisty(pasquale)\nConverted(pasquale)\nVarying(aube)\nHistorical(aube)\nBeat(aube)\nConverted(aube)\nforall x (Varying(x) -> Outrageous(x))\nforall x (Beat(x) and Outrageous(x) -> Twisty(x))\n\nnot Twisty(aube)\n\nVarying(aube) and forall x (Varying(x) -> Outrageous(x)) -> therefore Outrageous(aube) Beat(aube) and Outrageous(aube) and forall x (Beat(x) and Outrageous(x) -> Twisty(x)) -> therefore Twisty(aube)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Leonelle is undomestic. Leonelle is acrid. Leonelle is finable. Leonelle is brunet. Leonelle is ritardando. Leonelle is mitotic. Sharna is undomestic. Sharna is acrid. Sharna is finable. Sharna is mitotic. If something is undomestic then it is brunet. If something is finable and brunet then it is ritardando. Leonelle is not green.", "logic": "\nUndomestic(leonelle)\nAcrid(leonelle)\nFinable(leonelle)\nBrunet(leonelle)\nRitardando(leonelle)\nMitotic(leonelle)\nUndomestic(sharna)\nAcrid(sharna)\nFinable(sharna)\nMitotic(sharna)\nforall x (Undomestic(x) -> Brunet(x))\nforall x (Finable(x) and Brunet(x) -> Ritardando(x))\n\nnot Green(leonelle)\n\nnot Green(leonelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Easton is astute. Easton is unequipped. Easton is ablative. Easton is motivative. Easton is chafflike. Easton is lame. Wilone is astute. Wilone is unequipped. Wilone is ablative. Wilone is lame. If something is astute then it is motivative. If something is ablative and motivative then it is chafflike. Wilone is green.", "logic": "\nAstute(easton)\nUnequipped(easton)\nAblative(easton)\nMotivative(easton)\nChafflike(easton)\nLame(easton)\nAstute(wilone)\nUnequipped(wilone)\nAblative(wilone)\nLame(wilone)\nforall x (Astute(x) -> Motivative(x))\nforall x (Ablative(x) and Motivative(x) -> Chafflike(x))\n\nGreen(wilone)\n\nGreen(wilone) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The beulah liven the catrina. The beulah is optical. The beulah is slimy. The beulah is beetle. The beulah is scottish. The beulah is unmindful. The beulah sell the catrina. The beulah recover the catrina. The catrina liven the beulah. The catrina is optical. The catrina is slimy. The catrina is beetle. The catrina is scottish. The catrina is unmindful. The catrina sell the beulah. The catrina recover the beulah. If something liven the beulah and the beulah is slimy then it liven the catrina. If something liven the catrina and it is slimy then the catrina recover the beulah. If something recover the catrina then the catrina is unmindful. If something is beetle and unmindful then it liven the beulah. If something recover the catrina and the catrina recover the beulah then the beulah sell the catrina. If something liven the beulah then it recover the beulah. The beulah liven the catrina.", "logic": "\nLiven(beulah, catrina)\nOptical(beulah)\nSlimy(beulah)\nBeetle(beulah)\nScottish(beulah)\nUnmindful(beulah)\nSell(beulah, catrina)\nRecover(beulah, catrina)\nLiven(catrina, beulah)\nOptical(catrina)\nSlimy(catrina)\nBeetle(catrina)\nScottish(catrina)\nUnmindful(catrina)\nSell(catrina, beulah)\nRecover(catrina, beulah)\nforall x (Liven(x, beulah) and Slimy(beulah) -> Liven(x, catrina))\nforall x (Liven(x, catrina) and Slimy(x) -> Recover(catrina, beulah))\nforall x (Recover(x, catrina) -> Unmindful(catrina))\nforall x (Beetle(x) and Unmindful(x) -> Liven(x, beulah))\nforall x (Recover(x, catrina) and Recover(catrina, beulah) -> Sell(beulah, catrina))\nforall x (Liven(x, beulah) -> Recover(x, beulah))\n\nLiven(beulah, catrina)\n\ntherefore Liven(beulah, catrina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "The yolane effuse the devonne. The yolane is outback. The yolane is endermic. The yolane is branchless. The yolane is regnant. The yolane is tenth. The yolane parrot the devonne. The yolane expense the devonne. The devonne effuse the yolane. The devonne is outback. The devonne is endermic. The devonne is branchless. The devonne is regnant. The devonne is tenth. The devonne parrot the yolane. The devonne expense the yolane. If something effuse the yolane and the yolane is endermic then it effuse the devonne. If something effuse the devonne and it is endermic then the devonne expense the yolane. If something expense the devonne then the devonne is tenth. If something is branchless and tenth then it effuse the yolane. If something expense the devonne and the devonne expense the yolane then the yolane parrot the devonne. If something effuse the yolane then it expense the yolane. The devonne is not outback.", "logic": "\nEffuse(yolane, devonne)\nOutback(yolane)\nEndermic(yolane)\nBranchless(yolane)\nRegnant(yolane)\nTenth(yolane)\nParrot(yolane, devonne)\nExpense(yolane, devonne)\nEffuse(devonne, yolane)\nOutback(devonne)\nEndermic(devonne)\nBranchless(devonne)\nRegnant(devonne)\nTenth(devonne)\nParrot(devonne, yolane)\nExpense(devonne, yolane)\nforall x (Effuse(x, yolane) and Endermic(yolane) -> Effuse(x, devonne))\nforall x (Effuse(x, devonne) and Endermic(x) -> Expense(devonne, yolane))\nforall x (Expense(x, devonne) -> Tenth(devonne))\nforall x (Branchless(x) and Tenth(x) -> Effuse(x, yolane))\nforall x (Expense(x, devonne) and Expense(devonne, yolane) -> Parrot(yolane, devonne))\nforall x (Effuse(x, yolane) -> Expense(x, yolane))\n\nnot Outback(devonne)\n\ntherefore Outback(devonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "The larina theorize the verile. The larina is resilient. The larina is acheronian. The larina is lxxi. The larina is cationic. The larina is slanting. The larina apostatise the verile. The larina humble the verile. The verile theorize the larina. The verile is resilient. The verile is acheronian. The verile is lxxi. The verile is cationic. The verile is slanting. The verile apostatise the larina. The verile humble the larina. If something theorize the larina and the larina is acheronian then it theorize the verile. If something theorize the verile and it is acheronian then the verile humble the larina. If something humble the verile then the verile is slanting. If something is lxxi and slanting then it theorize the larina. If something humble the verile and the verile humble the larina then the larina apostatise the verile. If something theorize the larina then it humble the larina. The verile theorize the verile.", "logic": "\nTheorize(larina, verile)\nResilient(larina)\nAcheronian(larina)\nLxxi(larina)\nCationic(larina)\nSlanting(larina)\nApostatise(larina, verile)\nHumble(larina, verile)\nTheorize(verile, larina)\nResilient(verile)\nAcheronian(verile)\nLxxi(verile)\nCationic(verile)\nSlanting(verile)\nApostatise(verile, larina)\nHumble(verile, larina)\nforall x (Theorize(x, larina) and Acheronian(larina) -> Theorize(x, verile))\nforall x (Theorize(x, verile) and Acheronian(x) -> Humble(verile, larina))\nforall x (Humble(x, verile) -> Slanting(verile))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) and Slanting(x) -> Theorize(x, larina))\nforall x (Humble(x, verile) and Humble(verile, larina) -> Apostatise(larina, verile))\nforall x (Theorize(x, larina) -> Humble(x, larina))\n\nTheorize(verile, verile)\n\nTheorize(verile, larina) and Acheronian(larina) and forall x (Theorize(x, larina) and Acheronian(larina) -> Theorize(x, verile)) -> therefore Theorize(verile, verile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "The gretchen uphold the darcy. The gretchen is frugal. The gretchen is relocated. The gretchen is jiggered. The gretchen is inconstant. The gretchen is ebracteate. The gretchen cloud the darcy. The gretchen apostatise the darcy. The darcy uphold the gretchen. The darcy is frugal. The darcy is relocated. The darcy is jiggered. The darcy is inconstant. The darcy is ebracteate. The darcy cloud the gretchen. The darcy apostatise the gretchen. If something uphold the gretchen and the gretchen is relocated then it uphold the darcy. If something uphold the darcy and it is relocated then the darcy apostatise the gretchen. If something apostatise the darcy then the darcy is ebracteate. If something is jiggered and ebracteate then it uphold the gretchen. If something apostatise the darcy and the darcy apostatise the gretchen then the gretchen cloud the darcy. If something uphold the gretchen then it apostatise the gretchen. The darcy does not eat the darcy.", "logic": "\nUphold(gretchen, darcy)\nFrugal(gretchen)\nRelocated(gretchen)\nJiggered(gretchen)\nInconstant(gretchen)\nEbracteate(gretchen)\nCloud(gretchen, darcy)\nApostatise(gretchen, darcy)\nUphold(darcy, gretchen)\nFrugal(darcy)\nRelocated(darcy)\nJiggered(darcy)\nInconstant(darcy)\nEbracteate(darcy)\nCloud(darcy, gretchen)\nApostatise(darcy, gretchen)\nforall x (Uphold(x, gretchen) and Relocated(gretchen) -> Uphold(x, darcy))\nforall x (Uphold(x, darcy) and Relocated(x) -> Apostatise(darcy, gretchen))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, darcy) -> Ebracteate(darcy))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) and Ebracteate(x) -> Uphold(x, gretchen))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, darcy) and Apostatise(darcy, gretchen) -> Cloud(gretchen, darcy))\nforall x (Uphold(x, gretchen) -> Apostatise(x, gretchen))\n\nnot Uphold(darcy, darcy)\n\nUphold(darcy, gretchen) and Relocated(gretchen) and forall x (Uphold(x, gretchen) and Relocated(gretchen) -> Uphold(x, darcy)) -> therefore Uphold(darcy, darcy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "The patrick lump the reagan. The patrick is abatic. The patrick is deficient. The patrick is bright. The patrick is pitched. The patrick is pycnotic. The patrick segue the reagan. The patrick humbug the reagan. The reagan lump the patrick. The reagan is abatic. The reagan is deficient. The reagan is bright. The reagan is pitched. The reagan is pycnotic. The reagan segue the patrick. The reagan humbug the patrick. If something lump the patrick and the patrick is deficient then it lump the reagan. If something lump the reagan and it is deficient then the reagan humbug the patrick. If something humbug the reagan then the reagan is pycnotic. If something is bright and pycnotic then it lump the patrick. If something humbug the reagan and the reagan humbug the patrick then the patrick segue the reagan. If something lump the patrick then it humbug the patrick. The patrick humbug the patrick.", "logic": "\nLump(patrick, reagan)\nAbatic(patrick)\nDeficient(patrick)\nBright(patrick)\nPitched(patrick)\nPycnotic(patrick)\nSegue(patrick, reagan)\nHumbug(patrick, reagan)\nLump(reagan, patrick)\nAbatic(reagan)\nDeficient(reagan)\nBright(reagan)\nPitched(reagan)\nPycnotic(reagan)\nSegue(reagan, patrick)\nHumbug(reagan, patrick)\nforall x (Lump(x, patrick) and Deficient(patrick) -> Lump(x, reagan))\nforall x (Lump(x, reagan) and Deficient(x) -> Humbug(reagan, patrick))\nforall x (Humbug(x, reagan) -> Pycnotic(reagan))\nforall x (Bright(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Lump(x, patrick))\nforall x (Humbug(x, reagan) and Humbug(reagan, patrick) -> Segue(patrick, reagan))\nforall x (Lump(x, patrick) -> Humbug(x, patrick))\n\nHumbug(patrick, patrick)\n\nBright(patrick) and Pycnotic(patrick) and forall x (Bright(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Lump(x, patrick)) -> therefore Lump(patrick, patrick) Lump(patrick, patrick) and forall x (Lump(x, patrick) -> Humbug(x, patrick)) -> therefore Humbug(patrick, patrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "The bobina tussle the terrie. The bobina is mild. The bobina is manque. The bobina is passionate. The bobina is quack. The bobina is mangy. The bobina swerve the terrie. The bobina geyser the terrie. The terrie tussle the bobina. The terrie is mild. The terrie is manque. The terrie is passionate. The terrie is quack. The terrie is mangy. The terrie swerve the bobina. The terrie geyser the bobina. If something tussle the bobina and the bobina is manque then it tussle the terrie. If something tussle the terrie and it is manque then the terrie geyser the bobina. If something geyser the terrie then the terrie is mangy. If something is passionate and mangy then it tussle the bobina. If something geyser the terrie and the terrie geyser the bobina then the bobina swerve the terrie. If something tussle the bobina then it geyser the bobina. The bobina does not visit the bobina.", "logic": "\nTussle(bobina, terrie)\nMild(bobina)\nManque(bobina)\nPassionate(bobina)\nQuack(bobina)\nMangy(bobina)\nSwerve(bobina, terrie)\nGeyser(bobina, terrie)\nTussle(terrie, bobina)\nMild(terrie)\nManque(terrie)\nPassionate(terrie)\nQuack(terrie)\nMangy(terrie)\nSwerve(terrie, bobina)\nGeyser(terrie, bobina)\nforall x (Tussle(x, bobina) and Manque(bobina) -> Tussle(x, terrie))\nforall x (Tussle(x, terrie) and Manque(x) -> Geyser(terrie, bobina))\nforall x (Geyser(x, terrie) -> Mangy(terrie))\nforall x (Passionate(x) and Mangy(x) -> Tussle(x, bobina))\nforall x (Geyser(x, terrie) and Geyser(terrie, bobina) -> Swerve(bobina, terrie))\nforall x (Tussle(x, bobina) -> Geyser(x, bobina))\n\nnot Geyser(bobina, bobina)\n\nPassionate(bobina) and Mangy(bobina) and forall x (Passionate(x) and Mangy(x) -> Tussle(x, bobina)) -> therefore Tussle(bobina, bobina) Tussle(bobina, bobina) and forall x (Tussle(x, bobina) -> Geyser(x, bobina)) -> therefore Geyser(bobina, bobina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "The ferinand smock the frank. The ferinand is palliative. The ferinand is sixfold. The ferinand is svelte. The ferinand is glorious. The ferinand is unsaleable. The ferinand pillory the frank. The ferinand clabber the frank. The frank smock the ferinand. The frank is palliative. The frank is sixfold. The frank is svelte. The frank is glorious. The frank is unsaleable. The frank pillory the ferinand. The frank clabber the ferinand. If something smock the ferinand and the ferinand is sixfold then it smock the frank. If something smock the frank and it is sixfold then the frank clabber the ferinand. If something clabber the frank then the frank is unsaleable. If something is svelte and unsaleable then it smock the ferinand. If something clabber the frank and the frank clabber the ferinand then the ferinand pillory the frank. If something smock the ferinand then it clabber the ferinand. The ferinand does not see the ferinand.", "logic": "\nSmock(ferinand, frank)\nPalliative(ferinand)\nSixfold(ferinand)\nSvelte(ferinand)\nGlorious(ferinand)\nUnsaleable(ferinand)\nPillory(ferinand, frank)\nClabber(ferinand, frank)\nSmock(frank, ferinand)\nPalliative(frank)\nSixfold(frank)\nSvelte(frank)\nGlorious(frank)\nUnsaleable(frank)\nPillory(frank, ferinand)\nClabber(frank, ferinand)\nforall x (Smock(x, ferinand) and Sixfold(ferinand) -> Smock(x, frank))\nforall x (Smock(x, frank) and Sixfold(x) -> Clabber(frank, ferinand))\nforall x (Clabber(x, frank) -> Unsaleable(frank))\nforall x (Svelte(x) and Unsaleable(x) -> Smock(x, ferinand))\nforall x (Clabber(x, frank) and Clabber(frank, ferinand) -> Pillory(ferinand, frank))\nforall x (Smock(x, ferinand) -> Clabber(x, ferinand))\n\nnot Pillory(ferinand, ferinand)\n\nnot Pillory(ferinand, ferinand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "The glorianna jerk the cyb. The glorianna is lifelike. The glorianna is kashmiri. The glorianna is cryptic. The glorianna is recovering. The glorianna is lapidarian. The glorianna cooper the cyb. The glorianna bobble the cyb. The cyb jerk the glorianna. The cyb is lifelike. The cyb is kashmiri. The cyb is cryptic. The cyb is recovering. The cyb is lapidarian. The cyb cooper the glorianna. The cyb bobble the glorianna. If something jerk the glorianna and the glorianna is kashmiri then it jerk the cyb. If something jerk the cyb and it is kashmiri then the cyb bobble the glorianna. If something bobble the cyb then the cyb is lapidarian. If something is cryptic and lapidarian then it jerk the glorianna. If something bobble the cyb and the cyb bobble the glorianna then the glorianna cooper the cyb. If something jerk the glorianna then it bobble the glorianna. The cyb cooper the cyb.", "logic": "\nJerk(glorianna, cyb)\nLifelike(glorianna)\nKashmiri(glorianna)\nCryptic(glorianna)\nRecovering(glorianna)\nLapidarian(glorianna)\nCooper(glorianna, cyb)\nBobble(glorianna, cyb)\nJerk(cyb, glorianna)\nLifelike(cyb)\nKashmiri(cyb)\nCryptic(cyb)\nRecovering(cyb)\nLapidarian(cyb)\nCooper(cyb, glorianna)\nBobble(cyb, glorianna)\nforall x (Jerk(x, glorianna) and Kashmiri(glorianna) -> Jerk(x, cyb))\nforall x (Jerk(x, cyb) and Kashmiri(x) -> Bobble(cyb, glorianna))\nforall x (Bobble(x, cyb) -> Lapidarian(cyb))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and Lapidarian(x) -> Jerk(x, glorianna))\nforall x (Bobble(x, cyb) and Bobble(cyb, glorianna) -> Cooper(glorianna, cyb))\nforall x (Jerk(x, glorianna) -> Bobble(x, glorianna))\n\nCooper(cyb, cyb)\n\nCooper(cyb, cyb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-715"} {"premises": "Lynnea is pettish. Lynnea is abysmal. Lynnea is upstage. Lynnea is vulnerable. Jeane is pettish. Jeane is upstage. Gweneth is lovable. Gweneth is pagan. Gweneth is generic. Gweneth is upstage. Gweneth is vulnerable. Melesa is lovable. Melesa is generic. Melesa is abysmal. Melesa is upstage. White, pettish things are pagan. If Lynnea is generic and Lynnea is upstage then Lynnea is lovable. White, pettish things are lovable. All pagan, vulnerable things are abysmal. White, pagan things are abysmal. All generic things are abysmal. Lynnea is abysmal.", "logic": "\nPettish(lynnea)\nAbysmal(lynnea)\nUpstage(lynnea)\nVulnerable(lynnea)\nPettish(jeane)\nUpstage(jeane)\nLovable(gweneth)\nPagan(gweneth)\nGeneric(gweneth)\nUpstage(gweneth)\nVulnerable(gweneth)\nLovable(melesa)\nGeneric(melesa)\nAbysmal(melesa)\nUpstage(melesa)\nforall x (Upstage(x) and Pettish(x) -> Pagan(x))\nGeneric(lynnea) and Upstage(lynnea) -> Lovable(lynnea)\nforall x (Upstage(x) and Pettish(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) and Vulnerable(x) -> Abysmal(x))\nforall x (Upstage(x) and Pagan(x) -> Abysmal(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Abysmal(x))\n\nAbysmal(lynnea)\n\ntherefore Abysmal(lynnea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Lothar is pockmarked. Lothar is boughed. Lothar is lamblike. Lothar is habited. Waldo is pockmarked. Waldo is lamblike. Fionnula is bladdery. Fionnula is liable. Fionnula is knobby. Fionnula is lamblike. Fionnula is habited. Mandie is bladdery. Mandie is knobby. Mandie is boughed. Mandie is lamblike. White, pockmarked things are liable. If Lothar is knobby and Lothar is lamblike then Lothar is bladdery. White, pockmarked things are bladdery. All liable, habited things are boughed. White, liable things are boughed. All knobby things are boughed. Mandie is not knobby.", "logic": "\nPockmarked(lothar)\nBoughed(lothar)\nLamblike(lothar)\nHabited(lothar)\nPockmarked(waldo)\nLamblike(waldo)\nBladdery(fionnula)\nLiable(fionnula)\nKnobby(fionnula)\nLamblike(fionnula)\nHabited(fionnula)\nBladdery(mandie)\nKnobby(mandie)\nBoughed(mandie)\nLamblike(mandie)\nforall x (Lamblike(x) and Pockmarked(x) -> Liable(x))\nKnobby(lothar) and Lamblike(lothar) -> Bladdery(lothar)\nforall x (Lamblike(x) and Pockmarked(x) -> Bladdery(x))\nforall x (Liable(x) and Habited(x) -> Boughed(x))\nforall x (Lamblike(x) and Liable(x) -> Boughed(x))\nforall x (Knobby(x) -> Boughed(x))\n\nnot Knobby(mandie)\n\ntherefore Knobby(mandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Darbie is branching. Darbie is catalan. Darbie is satiny. Darbie is infatuated. Lotti is branching. Lotti is satiny. Sheree is occidental. Sheree is hominian. Sheree is poltroon. Sheree is satiny. Sheree is infatuated. Shadow is occidental. Shadow is poltroon. Shadow is catalan. Shadow is satiny. White, branching things are hominian. If Darbie is poltroon and Darbie is satiny then Darbie is occidental. White, branching things are occidental. All hominian, infatuated things are catalan. White, hominian things are catalan. All poltroon things are catalan. Lotti is hominian.", "logic": "\nBranching(darbie)\nCatalan(darbie)\nSatiny(darbie)\nInfatuated(darbie)\nBranching(lotti)\nSatiny(lotti)\nOccidental(sheree)\nHominian(sheree)\nPoltroon(sheree)\nSatiny(sheree)\nInfatuated(sheree)\nOccidental(shadow)\nPoltroon(shadow)\nCatalan(shadow)\nSatiny(shadow)\nforall x (Satiny(x) and Branching(x) -> Hominian(x))\nPoltroon(darbie) and Satiny(darbie) -> Occidental(darbie)\nforall x (Satiny(x) and Branching(x) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Hominian(x) and Infatuated(x) -> Catalan(x))\nforall x (Satiny(x) and Hominian(x) -> Catalan(x))\nforall x (Poltroon(x) -> Catalan(x))\n\nHominian(lotti)\n\nSatiny(lotti) and Branching(lotti) and forall x (Satiny(x) and Branching(x) -> Hominian(x)) -> therefore Hominian(lotti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Latisha is chechen. Latisha is harrowing. Latisha is togolese. Latisha is woven. Stacee is chechen. Stacee is togolese. Yank is wearing. Yank is bolivian. Yank is bated. Yank is togolese. Yank is woven. Tasha is wearing. Tasha is bated. Tasha is harrowing. Tasha is togolese. White, chechen things are bolivian. If Latisha is bated and Latisha is togolese then Latisha is wearing. White, chechen things are wearing. All bolivian, woven things are harrowing. White, bolivian things are harrowing. All bated things are harrowing. Latisha is not wearing.", "logic": "\nChechen(latisha)\nHarrowing(latisha)\nTogolese(latisha)\nWoven(latisha)\nChechen(stacee)\nTogolese(stacee)\nWearing(yank)\nBolivian(yank)\nBated(yank)\nTogolese(yank)\nWoven(yank)\nWearing(tasha)\nBated(tasha)\nHarrowing(tasha)\nTogolese(tasha)\nforall x (Togolese(x) and Chechen(x) -> Bolivian(x))\nBated(latisha) and Togolese(latisha) -> Wearing(latisha)\nforall x (Togolese(x) and Chechen(x) -> Wearing(x))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Woven(x) -> Harrowing(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) and Bolivian(x) -> Harrowing(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Harrowing(x))\n\nnot Wearing(latisha)\n\nTogolese(latisha) and Chechen(latisha) and forall x (Togolese(x) and Chechen(x) -> Wearing(x)) -> therefore Wearing(latisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Saunders is cesarean. Saunders is thickened. Saunders is monocarpic. Saunders is scaley. Shelba is cesarean. Shelba is monocarpic. Jerri is numerate. Jerri is nonunion. Jerri is ethnologic. Jerri is monocarpic. Jerri is scaley. Philip is numerate. Philip is ethnologic. Philip is thickened. Philip is monocarpic. White, cesarean things are nonunion. If Saunders is ethnologic and Saunders is monocarpic then Saunders is numerate. White, cesarean things are numerate. All nonunion, scaley things are thickened. White, nonunion things are thickened. All ethnologic things are thickened. Shelba is thickened.", "logic": "\nCesarean(saunders)\nThickened(saunders)\nMonocarpic(saunders)\nScaley(saunders)\nCesarean(shelba)\nMonocarpic(shelba)\nNumerate(jerri)\nNonunion(jerri)\nEthnologic(jerri)\nMonocarpic(jerri)\nScaley(jerri)\nNumerate(philip)\nEthnologic(philip)\nThickened(philip)\nMonocarpic(philip)\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) and Cesarean(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nEthnologic(saunders) and Monocarpic(saunders) -> Numerate(saunders)\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) and Cesarean(x) -> Numerate(x))\nforall x (Nonunion(x) and Scaley(x) -> Thickened(x))\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) and Nonunion(x) -> Thickened(x))\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> Thickened(x))\n\nThickened(shelba)\n\nMonocarpic(shelba) and Cesarean(shelba) and forall x (Monocarpic(x) and Cesarean(x) -> Nonunion(x)) -> therefore Nonunion(shelba) Monocarpic(shelba) and Nonunion(shelba) and forall x (Monocarpic(x) and Nonunion(x) -> Thickened(x)) -> therefore Thickened(shelba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Baily is invincible. Baily is overstated. Baily is forty. Baily is moslem. Judie is invincible. Judie is forty. Roscoe is dauntless. Roscoe is kindled. Roscoe is carinated. Roscoe is forty. Roscoe is moslem. Erina is dauntless. Erina is carinated. Erina is overstated. Erina is forty. White, invincible things are kindled. If Baily is carinated and Baily is forty then Baily is dauntless. White, invincible things are dauntless. All kindled, moslem things are overstated. White, kindled things are overstated. All carinated things are overstated. Judie is not overstated.", "logic": "\nInvincible(baily)\nOverstated(baily)\nForty(baily)\nMoslem(baily)\nInvincible(judie)\nForty(judie)\nDauntless(roscoe)\nKindled(roscoe)\nCarinated(roscoe)\nForty(roscoe)\nMoslem(roscoe)\nDauntless(erina)\nCarinated(erina)\nOverstated(erina)\nForty(erina)\nforall x (Forty(x) and Invincible(x) -> Kindled(x))\nCarinated(baily) and Forty(baily) -> Dauntless(baily)\nforall x (Forty(x) and Invincible(x) -> Dauntless(x))\nforall x (Kindled(x) and Moslem(x) -> Overstated(x))\nforall x (Forty(x) and Kindled(x) -> Overstated(x))\nforall x (Carinated(x) -> Overstated(x))\n\nnot Overstated(judie)\n\nForty(judie) and Invincible(judie) and forall x (Forty(x) and Invincible(x) -> Kindled(x)) -> therefore Kindled(judie) Forty(judie) and Kindled(judie) and forall x (Forty(x) and Kindled(x) -> Overstated(x)) -> therefore Overstated(judie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Umeko is hardbacked. Umeko is tendinous. Umeko is efficient. Umeko is protrusile. Shorty is hardbacked. Shorty is efficient. Cammy is whipping. Cammy is postexilic. Cammy is gestural. Cammy is efficient. Cammy is protrusile. Patsy is whipping. Patsy is gestural. Patsy is tendinous. Patsy is efficient. White, hardbacked things are postexilic. If Umeko is gestural and Umeko is efficient then Umeko is whipping. White, hardbacked things are whipping. All postexilic, protrusile things are tendinous. White, postexilic things are tendinous. All gestural things are tendinous. Patsy is not postexilic.", "logic": "\nHardbacked(umeko)\nTendinous(umeko)\nEfficient(umeko)\nProtrusile(umeko)\nHardbacked(shorty)\nEfficient(shorty)\nWhipping(cammy)\nPostexilic(cammy)\nGestural(cammy)\nEfficient(cammy)\nProtrusile(cammy)\nWhipping(patsy)\nGestural(patsy)\nTendinous(patsy)\nEfficient(patsy)\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Hardbacked(x) -> Postexilic(x))\nGestural(umeko) and Efficient(umeko) -> Whipping(umeko)\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Hardbacked(x) -> Whipping(x))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) and Protrusile(x) -> Tendinous(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Postexilic(x) -> Tendinous(x))\nforall x (Gestural(x) -> Tendinous(x))\n\nnot Postexilic(patsy)\n\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Hardbacked(x) -> Postexilic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Lulu is immoderate. Lulu is dominating. Lulu is plumose. Lulu is scholastic. Vina is immoderate. Vina is plumose. Cherey is melancholy. Cherey is nascent. Cherey is forbidden. Cherey is plumose. Cherey is scholastic. Cherida is melancholy. Cherida is forbidden. Cherida is dominating. Cherida is plumose. White, immoderate things are nascent. If Lulu is forbidden and Lulu is plumose then Lulu is melancholy. White, immoderate things are melancholy. All nascent, scholastic things are dominating. White, nascent things are dominating. All forbidden things are dominating. Cherey is immoderate.", "logic": "\nImmoderate(lulu)\nDominating(lulu)\nPlumose(lulu)\nScholastic(lulu)\nImmoderate(vina)\nPlumose(vina)\nMelancholy(cherey)\nNascent(cherey)\nForbidden(cherey)\nPlumose(cherey)\nScholastic(cherey)\nMelancholy(cherida)\nForbidden(cherida)\nDominating(cherida)\nPlumose(cherida)\nforall x (Plumose(x) and Immoderate(x) -> Nascent(x))\nForbidden(lulu) and Plumose(lulu) -> Melancholy(lulu)\nforall x (Plumose(x) and Immoderate(x) -> Melancholy(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and Scholastic(x) -> Dominating(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and Nascent(x) -> Dominating(x))\nforall x (Forbidden(x) -> Dominating(x))\n\nImmoderate(cherey)\n\nImmoderate(cherey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Lanny is jural. Lanny is moot. Lanny is clanking. Lanny is hopeless. Laurene is jural. Laurene is clanking. Marshal is polytonal. Marshal is irate. Marshal is adnate. Marshal is clanking. Marshal is hopeless. Sting is polytonal. Sting is adnate. Sting is moot. Sting is clanking. White, jural things are irate. If Lanny is adnate and Lanny is clanking then Lanny is polytonal. White, jural things are polytonal. All irate, hopeless things are moot. White, irate things are moot. All adnate things are moot. Sting is not hopeless.", "logic": "\nJural(lanny)\nMoot(lanny)\nClanking(lanny)\nHopeless(lanny)\nJural(laurene)\nClanking(laurene)\nPolytonal(marshal)\nIrate(marshal)\nAdnate(marshal)\nClanking(marshal)\nHopeless(marshal)\nPolytonal(sting)\nAdnate(sting)\nMoot(sting)\nClanking(sting)\nforall x (Clanking(x) and Jural(x) -> Irate(x))\nAdnate(lanny) and Clanking(lanny) -> Polytonal(lanny)\nforall x (Clanking(x) and Jural(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Irate(x) and Hopeless(x) -> Moot(x))\nforall x (Clanking(x) and Irate(x) -> Moot(x))\nforall x (Adnate(x) -> Moot(x))\n\nnot Hopeless(sting)\n\nnot Hopeless(sting) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Guido is gingerly. Guido is mythical. Guido is luscious. Guido is acid. Brandon is gingerly. Brandon is luscious. Jacinthe is trihydroxy. Jacinthe is inert. Jacinthe is less. Jacinthe is luscious. Jacinthe is acid. Barbara is trihydroxy. Barbara is less. Barbara is mythical. Barbara is luscious. White, gingerly things are inert. If Guido is less and Guido is luscious then Guido is trihydroxy. White, gingerly things are trihydroxy. All inert, acid things are mythical. White, inert things are mythical. All less things are mythical. Barbara is gingerly.", "logic": "\nGingerly(guido)\nMythical(guido)\nLuscious(guido)\nAcid(guido)\nGingerly(brandon)\nLuscious(brandon)\nTrihydroxy(jacinthe)\nInert(jacinthe)\nLess(jacinthe)\nLuscious(jacinthe)\nAcid(jacinthe)\nTrihydroxy(barbara)\nLess(barbara)\nMythical(barbara)\nLuscious(barbara)\nforall x (Luscious(x) and Gingerly(x) -> Inert(x))\nLess(guido) and Luscious(guido) -> Trihydroxy(guido)\nforall x (Luscious(x) and Gingerly(x) -> Trihydroxy(x))\nforall x (Inert(x) and Acid(x) -> Mythical(x))\nforall x (Luscious(x) and Inert(x) -> Mythical(x))\nforall x (Less(x) -> Mythical(x))\n\nGingerly(barbara)\n\nGingerly(barbara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Toni is vasiform. Toni is present. Toni is articled. Toni is frayed. Joannes is vasiform. Joannes is articled. Annaliese is undramatic. Annaliese is cultivated. Annaliese is podlike. Annaliese is articled. Annaliese is frayed. Philis is undramatic. Philis is podlike. Philis is present. Philis is articled. White, vasiform things are cultivated. If Toni is podlike and Toni is articled then Toni is undramatic. White, vasiform things are undramatic. All cultivated, frayed things are present. White, cultivated things are present. All podlike things are present. Joannes is not frayed.", "logic": "\nVasiform(toni)\nPresent(toni)\nArticled(toni)\nFrayed(toni)\nVasiform(joannes)\nArticled(joannes)\nUndramatic(annaliese)\nCultivated(annaliese)\nPodlike(annaliese)\nArticled(annaliese)\nFrayed(annaliese)\nUndramatic(philis)\nPodlike(philis)\nPresent(philis)\nArticled(philis)\nforall x (Articled(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Cultivated(x))\nPodlike(toni) and Articled(toni) -> Undramatic(toni)\nforall x (Articled(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Undramatic(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and Frayed(x) -> Present(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Present(x))\nforall x (Podlike(x) -> Present(x))\n\nnot Frayed(joannes)\n\nnot Frayed(joannes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Igor is enumerable. Igor is iberian. Igor is bilateral. Igor is mown. Sandie is enumerable. Sandie is bilateral. Case is unreal. Case is cupular. Case is floored. Case is bilateral. Case is mown. Kelila is unreal. Kelila is floored. Kelila is iberian. Kelila is bilateral. White, enumerable things are cupular. If Igor is floored and Igor is bilateral then Igor is unreal. White, enumerable things are unreal. All cupular, mown things are iberian. White, cupular things are iberian. All floored things are iberian. Igor is floored.", "logic": "\nEnumerable(igor)\nIberian(igor)\nBilateral(igor)\nMown(igor)\nEnumerable(sandie)\nBilateral(sandie)\nUnreal(case)\nCupular(case)\nFloored(case)\nBilateral(case)\nMown(case)\nUnreal(kelila)\nFloored(kelila)\nIberian(kelila)\nBilateral(kelila)\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Enumerable(x) -> Cupular(x))\nFloored(igor) and Bilateral(igor) -> Unreal(igor)\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Enumerable(x) -> Unreal(x))\nforall x (Cupular(x) and Mown(x) -> Iberian(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Cupular(x) -> Iberian(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) -> Iberian(x))\n\nFloored(igor)\n\nFloored(igor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2109"} {"premises": "Guinna is negotiable. Blakelee is boytrose. All negotiable people are literary. If someone is colour then they are existent. If someone is literary and negotiable then they are healthful. Blakelee is boytrose.", "logic": "\nNegotiable(guinna)\nBoytrose(blakelee)\nforall x (Negotiable(x) -> Literary(x))\nforall x (Colour(x) -> Existent(x))\nforall x (Literary(x) and Negotiable(x) -> Healthful(x))\n\nBoytrose(blakelee)\n\ntherefore Boytrose(blakelee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Marlo is histologic. Jemimah is utter. All histologic people are chimeral. If someone is perplexed then they are allegoric. If someone is chimeral and histologic then they are peachy. Jemimah is not utter.", "logic": "\nHistologic(marlo)\nUtter(jemimah)\nforall x (Histologic(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nforall x (Perplexed(x) -> Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Chimeral(x) and Histologic(x) -> Peachy(x))\n\nnot Utter(jemimah)\n\ntherefore Utter(jemimah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Nicki is megalithic. Chelsae is unobliging. All megalithic people are milklike. If someone is idolized then they are hexed. If someone is milklike and megalithic then they are hardback. Nicki is milklike.", "logic": "\nMegalithic(nicki)\nUnobliging(chelsae)\nforall x (Megalithic(x) -> Milklike(x))\nforall x (Idolized(x) -> Hexed(x))\nforall x (Milklike(x) and Megalithic(x) -> Hardback(x))\n\nMilklike(nicki)\n\nMegalithic(nicki) and forall x (Megalithic(x) -> Milklike(x)) -> therefore Milklike(nicki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Lyndsey is incredible. Sosanna is eclectic. All incredible people are pencilled. If someone is unionised then they are senatorial. If someone is pencilled and incredible then they are apostate. Lyndsey is not pencilled.", "logic": "\nIncredible(lyndsey)\nEclectic(sosanna)\nforall x (Incredible(x) -> Pencilled(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Pencilled(x) and Incredible(x) -> Apostate(x))\n\nnot Pencilled(lyndsey)\n\nIncredible(lyndsey) and forall x (Incredible(x) -> Pencilled(x)) -> therefore Pencilled(lyndsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Angil is emmetropic. Freddi is trivial. All emmetropic people are monodical. If someone is hortative then they are kantian. If someone is monodical and emmetropic then they are combative. Angil is combative.", "logic": "\nEmmetropic(angil)\nTrivial(freddi)\nforall x (Emmetropic(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Hortative(x) -> Kantian(x))\nforall x (Monodical(x) and Emmetropic(x) -> Combative(x))\n\nCombative(angil)\n\nEmmetropic(angil) and forall x (Emmetropic(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(angil) Monodical(angil) and Emmetropic(angil) and forall x (Monodical(x) and Emmetropic(x) -> Combative(x)) -> therefore Combative(angil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Emanuel is cheesy. Rosemonde is backmost. All cheesy people are frostian. If someone is disgusting then they are foster. If someone is frostian and cheesy then they are unary. Emanuel is not unary.", "logic": "\nCheesy(emanuel)\nBackmost(rosemonde)\nforall x (Cheesy(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Disgusting(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Frostian(x) and Cheesy(x) -> Unary(x))\n\nnot Unary(emanuel)\n\nCheesy(emanuel) and forall x (Cheesy(x) -> Frostian(x)) -> therefore Frostian(emanuel) Frostian(emanuel) and Cheesy(emanuel) and forall x (Frostian(x) and Cheesy(x) -> Unary(x)) -> therefore Unary(emanuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Jonathan is declared. Tomi is korean. All declared people are boffo. If someone is toothlike then they are immunised. If someone is boffo and declared then they are cheating. Tomi is not immunised.", "logic": "\nDeclared(jonathan)\nKorean(tomi)\nforall x (Declared(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Immunised(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) and Declared(x) -> Cheating(x))\n\nnot Immunised(tomi)\n\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Immunised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Caren is slubbed. Doreen is compressed. All slubbed people are zero. If someone is toothsome then they are down. If someone is zero and slubbed then they are trifoliate. Doreen is trifoliate.", "logic": "\nSlubbed(caren)\nCompressed(doreen)\nforall x (Slubbed(x) -> Zero(x))\nforall x (Toothsome(x) -> Down(x))\nforall x (Zero(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Trifoliate(x))\n\nTrifoliate(doreen)\n\nforall x (Zero(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Trifoliate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Martin is dyspneic. Tresa is unlawful. All dyspneic people are classified. If someone is unreadable then they are blebbed. If someone is classified and dyspneic then they are uncouth. Martin is not blebbed.", "logic": "\nDyspneic(martin)\nUnlawful(tresa)\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Unreadable(x) -> Blebbed(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) and Dyspneic(x) -> Uncouth(x))\n\nnot Blebbed(martin)\n\nforall x (Unreadable(x) -> Blebbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Corrie is lingual. Blaire is foolhardy. All lingual people are autacoidal. If someone is emerging then they are norse. If someone is autacoidal and lingual then they are upstanding. Blaire is emerging.", "logic": "\nLingual(corrie)\nFoolhardy(blaire)\nforall x (Lingual(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\nforall x (Emerging(x) -> Norse(x))\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and Lingual(x) -> Upstanding(x))\n\nEmerging(blaire)\n\nEmerging(blaire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Mae is sulfurized. Mellicent is peerless. All sulfurized people are hackneyed. If someone is adjustive then they are washed. If someone is hackneyed and sulfurized then they are arillate. Mae is not adjustive.", "logic": "\nSulfurized(mae)\nPeerless(mellicent)\nforall x (Sulfurized(x) -> Hackneyed(x))\nforall x (Adjustive(x) -> Washed(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) and Sulfurized(x) -> Arillate(x))\n\nnot Adjustive(mae)\n\nnot Adjustive(mae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "Florance is retinal. Laurent is leprose. All retinal people are segmental. If someone is atoxic then they are thrifty. If someone is segmental and retinal then they are gnostic. Laurent is smart.", "logic": "\nRetinal(florance)\nLeprose(laurent)\nforall x (Retinal(x) -> Segmental(x))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Thrifty(x))\nforall x (Segmental(x) and Retinal(x) -> Gnostic(x))\n\nSmart(laurent)\n\nSmart(laurent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2315"} {"premises": "The peggy is uncoiled. The peggy is infinite. The peggy is epiphyseal. The peggy is observing. The peggy is posh. The peggy calm the hayley. The peggy tarry the hayley. The peggy capsize the hayley. The hayley is uncoiled. The hayley is infinite. The hayley is epiphyseal. The hayley is posh. The hayley calm the peggy. The hayley tarry the peggy. The hayley capsize the peggy. If something tarry the hayley then the hayley is observing. If something calm the hayley and it capsize the peggy then it capsize the hayley. If something is observing then it calm the hayley. If something calm the hayley then the hayley capsize the peggy. If the hayley is posh then the hayley calm the peggy. If something is uncoiled and it tarry the peggy then the peggy is epiphyseal. The hayley is epiphyseal.", "logic": "\nUncoiled(peggy)\nInfinite(peggy)\nEpiphyseal(peggy)\nObserving(peggy)\nPosh(peggy)\nCalm(peggy, hayley)\nTarry(peggy, hayley)\nCapsize(peggy, hayley)\nUncoiled(hayley)\nInfinite(hayley)\nEpiphyseal(hayley)\nPosh(hayley)\nCalm(hayley, peggy)\nTarry(hayley, peggy)\nCapsize(hayley, peggy)\nforall x (Tarry(x, hayley) -> Observing(hayley))\nforall x (Calm(x, hayley) and Capsize(x, peggy) -> Capsize(x, hayley))\nforall x (Observing(x) -> Calm(x, hayley))\nforall x (Calm(x, hayley) -> Capsize(hayley, peggy))\nPosh(hayley) -> Calm(hayley, peggy)\nforall x (Uncoiled(x) and Tarry(x, peggy) -> Epiphyseal(peggy))\n\nEpiphyseal(hayley)\n\ntherefore Epiphyseal(hayley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The mari is cursory. The mari is sinful. The mari is tricolor. The mari is kitschy. The mari is sweptback. The mari bore the randolf. The mari balance the randolf. The mari economise the randolf. The randolf is cursory. The randolf is sinful. The randolf is tricolor. The randolf is sweptback. The randolf bore the mari. The randolf balance the mari. The randolf economise the mari. If something balance the randolf then the randolf is kitschy. If something bore the randolf and it economise the mari then it economise the randolf. If something is kitschy then it bore the randolf. If something bore the randolf then the randolf economise the mari. If the randolf is sweptback then the randolf bore the mari. If something is cursory and it balance the mari then the mari is tricolor. The randolf does not see the mari.", "logic": "\nCursory(mari)\nSinful(mari)\nTricolor(mari)\nKitschy(mari)\nSweptback(mari)\nBore(mari, randolf)\nBalance(mari, randolf)\nEconomise(mari, randolf)\nCursory(randolf)\nSinful(randolf)\nTricolor(randolf)\nSweptback(randolf)\nBore(randolf, mari)\nBalance(randolf, mari)\nEconomise(randolf, mari)\nforall x (Balance(x, randolf) -> Kitschy(randolf))\nforall x (Bore(x, randolf) and Economise(x, mari) -> Economise(x, randolf))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Bore(x, randolf))\nforall x (Bore(x, randolf) -> Economise(randolf, mari))\nSweptback(randolf) -> Bore(randolf, mari)\nforall x (Cursory(x) and Balance(x, mari) -> Tricolor(mari))\n\nnot Economise(randolf, mari)\n\ntherefore Economise(randolf, mari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The chery is andante. The chery is neutral. The chery is flavorous. The chery is flooded. The chery is mottled. The chery redevelop the flem. The chery rearm the flem. The chery estimate the flem. The flem is andante. The flem is neutral. The flem is flavorous. The flem is mottled. The flem redevelop the chery. The flem rearm the chery. The flem estimate the chery. If something rearm the flem then the flem is flooded. If something redevelop the flem and it estimate the chery then it estimate the flem. If something is flooded then it redevelop the flem. If something redevelop the flem then the flem estimate the chery. If the flem is mottled then the flem redevelop the chery. If something is andante and it rearm the chery then the chery is flavorous. The flem is flooded.", "logic": "\nAndante(chery)\nNeutral(chery)\nFlavorous(chery)\nFlooded(chery)\nMottled(chery)\nRedevelop(chery, flem)\nRearm(chery, flem)\nEstimate(chery, flem)\nAndante(flem)\nNeutral(flem)\nFlavorous(flem)\nMottled(flem)\nRedevelop(flem, chery)\nRearm(flem, chery)\nEstimate(flem, chery)\nforall x (Rearm(x, flem) -> Flooded(flem))\nforall x (Redevelop(x, flem) and Estimate(x, chery) -> Estimate(x, flem))\nforall x (Flooded(x) -> Redevelop(x, flem))\nforall x (Redevelop(x, flem) -> Estimate(flem, chery))\nMottled(flem) -> Redevelop(flem, chery)\nforall x (Andante(x) and Rearm(x, chery) -> Flavorous(chery))\n\nFlooded(flem)\n\nRearm(chery, flem) and forall x (Rearm(x, flem) -> Flooded(flem)) -> therefore Flooded(flem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The veriee is addled. The veriee is skyward. The veriee is scared. The veriee is foreboding. The veriee is roaring. The veriee digress the wilton. The veriee treat the wilton. The veriee chamfer the wilton. The wilton is addled. The wilton is skyward. The wilton is scared. The wilton is roaring. The wilton digress the veriee. The wilton treat the veriee. The wilton chamfer the veriee. If something treat the wilton then the wilton is foreboding. If something digress the wilton and it chamfer the veriee then it chamfer the wilton. If something is foreboding then it digress the wilton. If something digress the wilton then the wilton chamfer the veriee. If the wilton is roaring then the wilton digress the veriee. If something is addled and it treat the veriee then the veriee is scared. The wilton is not foreboding.", "logic": "\nAddled(veriee)\nSkyward(veriee)\nScared(veriee)\nForeboding(veriee)\nRoaring(veriee)\nDigress(veriee, wilton)\nTreat(veriee, wilton)\nChamfer(veriee, wilton)\nAddled(wilton)\nSkyward(wilton)\nScared(wilton)\nRoaring(wilton)\nDigress(wilton, veriee)\nTreat(wilton, veriee)\nChamfer(wilton, veriee)\nforall x (Treat(x, wilton) -> Foreboding(wilton))\nforall x (Digress(x, wilton) and Chamfer(x, veriee) -> Chamfer(x, wilton))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Digress(x, wilton))\nforall x (Digress(x, wilton) -> Chamfer(wilton, veriee))\nRoaring(wilton) -> Digress(wilton, veriee)\nforall x (Addled(x) and Treat(x, veriee) -> Scared(veriee))\n\nnot Foreboding(wilton)\n\nTreat(veriee, wilton) and forall x (Treat(x, wilton) -> Foreboding(wilton)) -> therefore Foreboding(wilton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The davina is cardinal. The davina is rabbinical. The davina is acquired. The davina is alienating. The davina is denudate. The davina autopsy the leiah. The davina nauseate the leiah. The davina grain the leiah. The leiah is cardinal. The leiah is rabbinical. The leiah is acquired. The leiah is denudate. The leiah autopsy the davina. The leiah nauseate the davina. The leiah grain the davina. If something nauseate the leiah then the leiah is alienating. If something autopsy the leiah and it grain the davina then it grain the leiah. If something is alienating then it autopsy the leiah. If something autopsy the leiah then the leiah grain the davina. If the leiah is denudate then the leiah autopsy the davina. If something is cardinal and it nauseate the davina then the davina is acquired. The leiah autopsy the leiah.", "logic": "\nCardinal(davina)\nRabbinical(davina)\nAcquired(davina)\nAlienating(davina)\nDenudate(davina)\nAutopsy(davina, leiah)\nNauseate(davina, leiah)\nGrain(davina, leiah)\nCardinal(leiah)\nRabbinical(leiah)\nAcquired(leiah)\nDenudate(leiah)\nAutopsy(leiah, davina)\nNauseate(leiah, davina)\nGrain(leiah, davina)\nforall x (Nauseate(x, leiah) -> Alienating(leiah))\nforall x (Autopsy(x, leiah) and Grain(x, davina) -> Grain(x, leiah))\nforall x (Alienating(x) -> Autopsy(x, leiah))\nforall x (Autopsy(x, leiah) -> Grain(leiah, davina))\nDenudate(leiah) -> Autopsy(leiah, davina)\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Nauseate(x, davina) -> Acquired(davina))\n\nAutopsy(leiah, leiah)\n\nNauseate(davina, leiah) and forall x (Nauseate(x, leiah) -> Alienating(leiah)) -> therefore Alienating(leiah) Alienating(leiah) and forall x (Alienating(x) -> Autopsy(x, leiah)) -> therefore Autopsy(leiah, leiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The berni is unmusical. The berni is guided. The berni is beady. The berni is motherly. The berni is bistered. The berni hemstitch the tiffie. The berni stargaze the tiffie. The berni cuddle the tiffie. The tiffie is unmusical. The tiffie is guided. The tiffie is beady. The tiffie is bistered. The tiffie hemstitch the berni. The tiffie stargaze the berni. The tiffie cuddle the berni. If something stargaze the tiffie then the tiffie is motherly. If something hemstitch the tiffie and it cuddle the berni then it cuddle the tiffie. If something is motherly then it hemstitch the tiffie. If something hemstitch the tiffie then the tiffie cuddle the berni. If the tiffie is bistered then the tiffie hemstitch the berni. If something is unmusical and it stargaze the berni then the berni is beady. The tiffie does not like the tiffie.", "logic": "\nUnmusical(berni)\nGuided(berni)\nBeady(berni)\nMotherly(berni)\nBistered(berni)\nHemstitch(berni, tiffie)\nStargaze(berni, tiffie)\nCuddle(berni, tiffie)\nUnmusical(tiffie)\nGuided(tiffie)\nBeady(tiffie)\nBistered(tiffie)\nHemstitch(tiffie, berni)\nStargaze(tiffie, berni)\nCuddle(tiffie, berni)\nforall x (Stargaze(x, tiffie) -> Motherly(tiffie))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, tiffie) and Cuddle(x, berni) -> Cuddle(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Motherly(x) -> Hemstitch(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, tiffie) -> Cuddle(tiffie, berni))\nBistered(tiffie) -> Hemstitch(tiffie, berni)\nforall x (Unmusical(x) and Stargaze(x, berni) -> Beady(berni))\n\nnot Hemstitch(tiffie, tiffie)\n\nStargaze(berni, tiffie) and forall x (Stargaze(x, tiffie) -> Motherly(tiffie)) -> therefore Motherly(tiffie) Motherly(tiffie) and forall x (Motherly(x) -> Hemstitch(x, tiffie)) -> therefore Hemstitch(tiffie, tiffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The tad is uplifted. The tad is savory. The tad is tapered. The tad is sleeping. The tad is limber. The tad microwave the roseanne. The tad lessen the roseanne. The tad reunify the roseanne. The roseanne is uplifted. The roseanne is savory. The roseanne is tapered. The roseanne is limber. The roseanne microwave the tad. The roseanne lessen the tad. The roseanne reunify the tad. If something lessen the roseanne then the roseanne is sleeping. If something microwave the roseanne and it reunify the tad then it reunify the roseanne. If something is sleeping then it microwave the roseanne. If something microwave the roseanne then the roseanne reunify the tad. If the roseanne is limber then the roseanne microwave the tad. If something is uplifted and it lessen the tad then the tad is tapered. The tad does not like the tad.", "logic": "\nUplifted(tad)\nSavory(tad)\nTapered(tad)\nSleeping(tad)\nLimber(tad)\nMicrowave(tad, roseanne)\nLessen(tad, roseanne)\nReunify(tad, roseanne)\nUplifted(roseanne)\nSavory(roseanne)\nTapered(roseanne)\nLimber(roseanne)\nMicrowave(roseanne, tad)\nLessen(roseanne, tad)\nReunify(roseanne, tad)\nforall x (Lessen(x, roseanne) -> Sleeping(roseanne))\nforall x (Microwave(x, roseanne) and Reunify(x, tad) -> Reunify(x, roseanne))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) -> Microwave(x, roseanne))\nforall x (Microwave(x, roseanne) -> Reunify(roseanne, tad))\nLimber(roseanne) -> Microwave(roseanne, tad)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) and Lessen(x, tad) -> Tapered(tad))\n\nnot Microwave(tad, tad)\n\nnot Microwave(tad, tad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The blaire is bituminoid. The blaire is hornlike. The blaire is antitoxic. The blaire is nosed. The blaire is psychic. The blaire summarise the deane. The blaire conjoin the deane. The blaire tremble the deane. The deane is bituminoid. The deane is hornlike. The deane is antitoxic. The deane is psychic. The deane summarise the blaire. The deane conjoin the blaire. The deane tremble the blaire. If something conjoin the deane then the deane is nosed. If something summarise the deane and it tremble the blaire then it tremble the deane. If something is nosed then it summarise the deane. If something summarise the deane then the deane tremble the blaire. If the deane is psychic then the deane summarise the blaire. If something is bituminoid and it conjoin the blaire then the blaire is antitoxic. The deane conjoin the deane.", "logic": "\nBituminoid(blaire)\nHornlike(blaire)\nAntitoxic(blaire)\nNosed(blaire)\nPsychic(blaire)\nSummarise(blaire, deane)\nConjoin(blaire, deane)\nTremble(blaire, deane)\nBituminoid(deane)\nHornlike(deane)\nAntitoxic(deane)\nPsychic(deane)\nSummarise(deane, blaire)\nConjoin(deane, blaire)\nTremble(deane, blaire)\nforall x (Conjoin(x, deane) -> Nosed(deane))\nforall x (Summarise(x, deane) and Tremble(x, blaire) -> Tremble(x, deane))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Summarise(x, deane))\nforall x (Summarise(x, deane) -> Tremble(deane, blaire))\nPsychic(deane) -> Summarise(deane, blaire)\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) and Conjoin(x, blaire) -> Antitoxic(blaire))\n\nConjoin(deane, deane)\n\nConjoin(deane, deane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The arlyne is acuate. The arlyne is employed. The arlyne is besotted. The arlyne is attrited. The arlyne is beatable. The arlyne brad the caritta. The arlyne recap the caritta. The arlyne raze the caritta. The caritta is acuate. The caritta is employed. The caritta is besotted. The caritta is beatable. The caritta brad the arlyne. The caritta recap the arlyne. The caritta raze the arlyne. If something recap the caritta then the caritta is attrited. If something brad the caritta and it raze the arlyne then it raze the caritta. If something is attrited then it brad the caritta. If something brad the caritta then the caritta raze the arlyne. If the caritta is beatable then the caritta brad the arlyne. If something is acuate and it recap the arlyne then the arlyne is besotted. The arlyne does not need the arlyne.", "logic": "\nAcuate(arlyne)\nEmployed(arlyne)\nBesotted(arlyne)\nAttrited(arlyne)\nBeatable(arlyne)\nBrad(arlyne, caritta)\nRecap(arlyne, caritta)\nRaze(arlyne, caritta)\nAcuate(caritta)\nEmployed(caritta)\nBesotted(caritta)\nBeatable(caritta)\nBrad(caritta, arlyne)\nRecap(caritta, arlyne)\nRaze(caritta, arlyne)\nforall x (Recap(x, caritta) -> Attrited(caritta))\nforall x (Brad(x, caritta) and Raze(x, arlyne) -> Raze(x, caritta))\nforall x (Attrited(x) -> Brad(x, caritta))\nforall x (Brad(x, caritta) -> Raze(caritta, arlyne))\nBeatable(caritta) -> Brad(caritta, arlyne)\nforall x (Acuate(x) and Recap(x, arlyne) -> Besotted(arlyne))\n\nnot Recap(arlyne, arlyne)\n\nnot Recap(arlyne, arlyne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "The cornelle is mothy. The cornelle is unusable. The cornelle is milch. The cornelle is integrated. The cornelle is zonal. The cornelle lunge the wandis. The cornelle anodise the wandis. The cornelle displace the wandis. The wandis is mothy. The wandis is unusable. The wandis is milch. The wandis is zonal. The wandis lunge the cornelle. The wandis anodise the cornelle. The wandis displace the cornelle. If something anodise the wandis then the wandis is integrated. If something lunge the wandis and it displace the cornelle then it displace the wandis. If something is integrated then it lunge the wandis. If something lunge the wandis then the wandis displace the cornelle. If the wandis is zonal then the wandis lunge the cornelle. If something is mothy and it anodise the cornelle then the cornelle is milch. The cornelle displace the cornelle.", "logic": "\nMothy(cornelle)\nUnusable(cornelle)\nMilch(cornelle)\nIntegrated(cornelle)\nZonal(cornelle)\nLunge(cornelle, wandis)\nAnodise(cornelle, wandis)\nDisplace(cornelle, wandis)\nMothy(wandis)\nUnusable(wandis)\nMilch(wandis)\nZonal(wandis)\nLunge(wandis, cornelle)\nAnodise(wandis, cornelle)\nDisplace(wandis, cornelle)\nforall x (Anodise(x, wandis) -> Integrated(wandis))\nforall x (Lunge(x, wandis) and Displace(x, cornelle) -> Displace(x, wandis))\nforall x (Integrated(x) -> Lunge(x, wandis))\nforall x (Lunge(x, wandis) -> Displace(wandis, cornelle))\nZonal(wandis) -> Lunge(wandis, cornelle)\nforall x (Mothy(x) and Anodise(x, cornelle) -> Milch(cornelle))\n\nDisplace(cornelle, cornelle)\n\nDisplace(cornelle, cornelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1543"} {"premises": "Wyatt is thalassic. If something is equivocal and not thalassic then it is heard. If something is welcoming then it is heard. If Wyatt is real then Wyatt is heard. If something is heard then it is welcoming. Nice things are befitting. All thalassic things are real. Wyatt is thalassic.", "logic": "\nThalassic(wyatt)\nforall x (Equivocal(x) and not Thalassic(x) -> Heard(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) -> Heard(x))\nReal(wyatt) -> Heard(wyatt)\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) -> Befitting(x))\nforall x (Thalassic(x) -> Real(x))\n\nThalassic(wyatt)\n\ntherefore Thalassic(wyatt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Shanda is ethical. If something is final and not ethical then it is smoky. If something is oversized then it is smoky. If Shanda is maximising then Shanda is smoky. If something is smoky then it is oversized. Nice things are workable. All ethical things are maximising. Shanda is not ethical.", "logic": "\nEthical(shanda)\nforall x (Final(x) and not Ethical(x) -> Smoky(x))\nforall x (Oversized(x) -> Smoky(x))\nMaximising(shanda) -> Smoky(shanda)\nforall x (Smoky(x) -> Oversized(x))\nforall x (Oversized(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Ethical(x) -> Maximising(x))\n\nnot Ethical(shanda)\n\ntherefore Ethical(shanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Benedict is cased. If something is victorious and not cased then it is ahorse. If something is ungroomed then it is ahorse. If Benedict is parched then Benedict is ahorse. If something is ahorse then it is ungroomed. Nice things are benthonic. All cased things are parched. Benedict is parched.", "logic": "\nCased(benedict)\nforall x (Victorious(x) and not Cased(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nParched(benedict) -> Ahorse(benedict)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Ungroomed(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nforall x (Cased(x) -> Parched(x))\n\nParched(benedict)\n\nCased(benedict) and forall x (Cased(x) -> Parched(x)) -> therefore Parched(benedict)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Noble is traveled. If something is favored and not traveled then it is azotemic. If something is incurvate then it is azotemic. If Noble is rallying then Noble is azotemic. If something is azotemic then it is incurvate. Nice things are epilithic. All traveled things are rallying. Noble is not rallying.", "logic": "\nTraveled(noble)\nforall x (Favored(x) and not Traveled(x) -> Azotemic(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x) -> Azotemic(x))\nRallying(noble) -> Azotemic(noble)\nforall x (Azotemic(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x) -> Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Traveled(x) -> Rallying(x))\n\nnot Rallying(noble)\n\nTraveled(noble) and forall x (Traveled(x) -> Rallying(x)) -> therefore Rallying(noble)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Annabal is biparous. If something is impelling and not biparous then it is luxuriant. If something is moralistic then it is luxuriant. If Annabal is hesitant then Annabal is luxuriant. If something is luxuriant then it is moralistic. Nice things are unwilling. All biparous things are hesitant. Annabal is luxuriant.", "logic": "\nBiparous(annabal)\nforall x (Impelling(x) and not Biparous(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nHesitant(annabal) -> Luxuriant(annabal)\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Biparous(x) -> Hesitant(x))\n\nLuxuriant(annabal)\n\nBiparous(annabal) and forall x (Biparous(x) -> Hesitant(x)) -> therefore Hesitant(annabal) Hesitant(annabal) and Hesitant(annabal) -> Luxuriant(annabal) -> therefore Luxuriant(annabal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Munroe is irish. If something is hygienic and not irish then it is caddish. If something is fossorial then it is caddish. If Munroe is extensible then Munroe is caddish. If something is caddish then it is fossorial. Nice things are lineal. All irish things are extensible. Munroe is not caddish.", "logic": "\nIrish(munroe)\nforall x (Hygienic(x) and not Irish(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Fossorial(x) -> Caddish(x))\nExtensible(munroe) -> Caddish(munroe)\nforall x (Caddish(x) -> Fossorial(x))\nforall x (Fossorial(x) -> Lineal(x))\nforall x (Irish(x) -> Extensible(x))\n\nnot Caddish(munroe)\n\nIrish(munroe) and forall x (Irish(x) -> Extensible(x)) -> therefore Extensible(munroe) Extensible(munroe) and Extensible(munroe) -> Caddish(munroe) -> therefore Caddish(munroe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Gerome is kaput. If something is geodesical and not kaput then it is accursed. If something is shamanist then it is accursed. If Gerome is changeless then Gerome is accursed. If something is accursed then it is shamanist. Nice things are forbidding. All kaput things are changeless. Gerome is not quiet.", "logic": "\nKaput(gerome)\nforall x (Geodesical(x) and not Kaput(x) -> Accursed(x))\nforall x (Shamanist(x) -> Accursed(x))\nChangeless(gerome) -> Accursed(gerome)\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Shamanist(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Kaput(x) -> Changeless(x))\n\nnot Quiet(gerome)\n\nnot Quiet(gerome) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Geraldo is dappled. If something is himalayan and not dappled then it is politic. If something is bats then it is politic. If Geraldo is priestly then Geraldo is politic. If something is politic then it is bats. Nice things are ordinal. All dappled things are priestly. Geraldo is himalayan.", "logic": "\nDappled(geraldo)\nforall x (Himalayan(x) and not Dappled(x) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) -> Politic(x))\nPriestly(geraldo) -> Politic(geraldo)\nforall x (Politic(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) -> Ordinal(x))\nforall x (Dappled(x) -> Priestly(x))\n\nHimalayan(geraldo)\n\nHimalayan(geraldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1943"} {"premises": "Fremont is anopheline. Fremont is azygous. Fremont is anoestrous. Whitney is anoestrous. Whitney is reticent. Whitney is unbeloved. Harvie is anoestrous. Merry is anopheline. Merry is barbate. Merry is unbeloved. Big, anoestrous people are sunlit. All sunlit people are unbeloved. Whitney is unbeloved.", "logic": "\nAnopheline(fremont)\nAzygous(fremont)\nAnoestrous(fremont)\nAnoestrous(whitney)\nReticent(whitney)\nUnbeloved(whitney)\nAnoestrous(harvie)\nAnopheline(merry)\nBarbate(merry)\nUnbeloved(merry)\nforall x (Anopheline(x) and Anoestrous(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) -> Unbeloved(x))\n\nUnbeloved(whitney)\n\ntherefore Unbeloved(whitney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Delaney is ungallant. Delaney is academic. Delaney is hurried. Verene is hurried. Verene is stifled. Verene is advancing. Kiah is hurried. Ethyl is ungallant. Ethyl is plummy. Ethyl is advancing. Big, hurried people are aflicker. All aflicker people are advancing. Ethyl is not ungallant.", "logic": "\nUngallant(delaney)\nAcademic(delaney)\nHurried(delaney)\nHurried(verene)\nStifled(verene)\nAdvancing(verene)\nHurried(kiah)\nUngallant(ethyl)\nPlummy(ethyl)\nAdvancing(ethyl)\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Hurried(x) -> Aflicker(x))\nforall x (Aflicker(x) -> Advancing(x))\n\nnot Ungallant(ethyl)\n\ntherefore Ungallant(ethyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Syd is orbitual. Syd is cerise. Syd is meatless. Nealon is meatless. Nealon is bifurcated. Nealon is saxatile. Mara is meatless. Eadith is orbitual. Eadith is squalid. Eadith is saxatile. Big, meatless people are measly. All measly people are saxatile. Syd is measly.", "logic": "\nOrbitual(syd)\nCerise(syd)\nMeatless(syd)\nMeatless(nealon)\nBifurcated(nealon)\nSaxatile(nealon)\nMeatless(mara)\nOrbitual(eadith)\nSqualid(eadith)\nSaxatile(eadith)\nforall x (Orbitual(x) and Meatless(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) -> Saxatile(x))\n\nMeasly(syd)\n\nOrbitual(syd) and Meatless(syd) and forall x (Orbitual(x) and Meatless(x) -> Measly(x)) -> therefore Measly(syd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Vania is astomatal. Vania is peerless. Vania is siamese. Kerri is siamese. Kerri is maltreated. Kerri is unmodified. Daniella is siamese. Stanley is astomatal. Stanley is ergodic. Stanley is unmodified. Big, siamese people are descending. All descending people are unmodified. Vania is not descending.", "logic": "\nAstomatal(vania)\nPeerless(vania)\nSiamese(vania)\nSiamese(kerri)\nMaltreated(kerri)\nUnmodified(kerri)\nSiamese(daniella)\nAstomatal(stanley)\nErgodic(stanley)\nUnmodified(stanley)\nforall x (Astomatal(x) and Siamese(x) -> Descending(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) -> Unmodified(x))\n\nnot Descending(vania)\n\nAstomatal(vania) and Siamese(vania) and forall x (Astomatal(x) and Siamese(x) -> Descending(x)) -> therefore Descending(vania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Josy is unadvised. Josy is intrusive. Josy is scurrilous. Byram is scurrilous. Byram is otiose. Byram is unspecific. Nathalia is scurrilous. Susannah is unadvised. Susannah is principled. Susannah is unspecific. Big, scurrilous people are unmated. All unmated people are unspecific. Josy is unspecific.", "logic": "\nUnadvised(josy)\nIntrusive(josy)\nScurrilous(josy)\nScurrilous(byram)\nOtiose(byram)\nUnspecific(byram)\nScurrilous(nathalia)\nUnadvised(susannah)\nPrincipled(susannah)\nUnspecific(susannah)\nforall x (Unadvised(x) and Scurrilous(x) -> Unmated(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) -> Unspecific(x))\n\nUnspecific(josy)\n\nUnadvised(josy) and Scurrilous(josy) and forall x (Unadvised(x) and Scurrilous(x) -> Unmated(x)) -> therefore Unmated(josy) Unmated(josy) and forall x (Unmated(x) -> Unspecific(x)) -> therefore Unspecific(josy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Ahmad is protean. Ahmad is avian. Ahmad is improbable. Xavier is improbable. Xavier is edentate. Xavier is spunky. Emalia is improbable. Debra is protean. Debra is endogamic. Debra is spunky. Big, improbable people are expansile. All expansile people are spunky. Ahmad is not spunky.", "logic": "\nProtean(ahmad)\nAvian(ahmad)\nImprobable(ahmad)\nImprobable(xavier)\nEdentate(xavier)\nSpunky(xavier)\nImprobable(emalia)\nProtean(debra)\nEndogamic(debra)\nSpunky(debra)\nforall x (Protean(x) and Improbable(x) -> Expansile(x))\nforall x (Expansile(x) -> Spunky(x))\n\nnot Spunky(ahmad)\n\nProtean(ahmad) and Improbable(ahmad) and forall x (Protean(x) and Improbable(x) -> Expansile(x)) -> therefore Expansile(ahmad) Expansile(ahmad) and forall x (Expansile(x) -> Spunky(x)) -> therefore Spunky(ahmad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Gretchen is accusive. Gretchen is inflexible. Gretchen is completing. Hastings is completing. Hastings is hyaline. Hastings is fatalistic. Hakim is completing. Chloris is accusive. Chloris is ultimo. Chloris is fatalistic. Big, completing people are inflated. All inflated people are fatalistic. Hakim is not inflated.", "logic": "\nAccusive(gretchen)\nInflexible(gretchen)\nCompleting(gretchen)\nCompleting(hastings)\nHyaline(hastings)\nFatalistic(hastings)\nCompleting(hakim)\nAccusive(chloris)\nUltimo(chloris)\nFatalistic(chloris)\nforall x (Accusive(x) and Completing(x) -> Inflated(x))\nforall x (Inflated(x) -> Fatalistic(x))\n\nnot Inflated(hakim)\n\nforall x (Accusive(x) and Completing(x) -> Inflated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Janus is studded. Janus is maltese. Janus is amorous. Sheila is amorous. Sheila is smiling. Sheila is amatory. Ashlen is amorous. Avivah is studded. Avivah is greenside. Avivah is amatory. Big, amorous people are untapped. All untapped people are amatory. Sheila is untapped.", "logic": "\nStudded(janus)\nMaltese(janus)\nAmorous(janus)\nAmorous(sheila)\nSmiling(sheila)\nAmatory(sheila)\nAmorous(ashlen)\nStudded(avivah)\nGreenside(avivah)\nAmatory(avivah)\nforall x (Studded(x) and Amorous(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> Amatory(x))\n\nUntapped(sheila)\n\nforall x (Studded(x) and Amorous(x) -> Untapped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Phaidra is nonplussed. Phaidra is situated. Phaidra is alienating. Marlo is alienating. Marlo is adolescent. Marlo is torturing. Beryl is alienating. Adelle is nonplussed. Adelle is essene. Adelle is torturing. Big, alienating people are orientated. All orientated people are torturing. Beryl is not torturing.", "logic": "\nNonplussed(phaidra)\nSituated(phaidra)\nAlienating(phaidra)\nAlienating(marlo)\nAdolescent(marlo)\nTorturing(marlo)\nAlienating(beryl)\nNonplussed(adelle)\nEssene(adelle)\nTorturing(adelle)\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) and Alienating(x) -> Orientated(x))\nforall x (Orientated(x) -> Torturing(x))\n\nnot Torturing(beryl)\n\nforall x (Orientated(x) -> Torturing(x)) <- forall x (Nonplussed(x) and Alienating(x) -> Orientated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Stefania is perverse. Stefania is defiant. Stefania is flinty. Kathrine is flinty. Kathrine is murmuring. Kathrine is sunset. Teresa is flinty. Millisent is perverse. Millisent is sanitized. Millisent is sunset. Big, flinty people are chylous. All chylous people are sunset. Kathrine is defiant.", "logic": "\nPerverse(stefania)\nDefiant(stefania)\nFlinty(stefania)\nFlinty(kathrine)\nMurmuring(kathrine)\nSunset(kathrine)\nFlinty(teresa)\nPerverse(millisent)\nSanitized(millisent)\nSunset(millisent)\nforall x (Perverse(x) and Flinty(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Sunset(x))\n\nDefiant(kathrine)\n\nDefiant(kathrine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Aggy is real. Aggy is tanned. Aggy is destroyed. Web is destroyed. Web is crucial. Web is ablaze. Eba is destroyed. Hedy is real. Hedy is undismayed. Hedy is ablaze. Big, destroyed people are supervised. All supervised people are ablaze. Hedy is not destroyed.", "logic": "\nReal(aggy)\nTanned(aggy)\nDestroyed(aggy)\nDestroyed(web)\nCrucial(web)\nAblaze(web)\nDestroyed(eba)\nReal(hedy)\nUndismayed(hedy)\nAblaze(hedy)\nforall x (Real(x) and Destroyed(x) -> Supervised(x))\nforall x (Supervised(x) -> Ablaze(x))\n\nnot Destroyed(hedy)\n\nnot Destroyed(hedy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Austine is digitate. Austine is ovular. Austine is literal. Dynah is literal. Dynah is focussed. Dynah is backstage. Niels is literal. Ford is digitate. Ford is morose. Ford is backstage. Big, literal people are vaccinated. All vaccinated people are backstage. Dynah is digitate.", "logic": "\nDigitate(austine)\nOvular(austine)\nLiteral(austine)\nLiteral(dynah)\nFocussed(dynah)\nBackstage(dynah)\nLiteral(niels)\nDigitate(ford)\nMorose(ford)\nBackstage(ford)\nforall x (Digitate(x) and Literal(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Backstage(x))\n\nDigitate(dynah)\n\nDigitate(dynah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Lorie is satiate. Lorie is not surreal. Lorie is bouncy. Lorie is shared. Moya is satiate. Moya is not surreal. Moya is not bouncy. Moya is shared. Moya is scripted. Moya is munificent. Annadiane is cutaneal. Annadiane is satiate. Annadiane is bouncy. Annadiane is shared. Annadiane is scripted. Annadiane is munificent. If someone is bouncy and scripted then they are satiate. All bouncy people are munificent. If Annadiane is surreal and Annadiane is satiate then Annadiane is bouncy. If Moya is munificent then Moya is satiate. If Lorie is not bouncy then Lorie is surreal. If Lorie is cutaneal and Lorie is munificent then Lorie is not surreal. Young people are scripted. If someone is surreal then they are cutaneal. Lorie is shared.", "logic": "\nSatiate(lorie)\nnot Surreal(lorie)\nBouncy(lorie)\nShared(lorie)\nSatiate(moya)\nnot Surreal(moya)\nnot Bouncy(moya)\nShared(moya)\nScripted(moya)\nMunificent(moya)\nCutaneal(annadiane)\nSatiate(annadiane)\nBouncy(annadiane)\nShared(annadiane)\nScripted(annadiane)\nMunificent(annadiane)\nforall x (Bouncy(x) and Scripted(x) -> Satiate(x))\nforall x (Bouncy(x) -> Munificent(x))\nSurreal(annadiane) and Satiate(annadiane) -> Bouncy(annadiane)\nMunificent(moya) -> Satiate(moya)\nnot Bouncy(lorie) -> Surreal(lorie)\nCutaneal(lorie) and Munificent(lorie) -> not Surreal(lorie)\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Scripted(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Cutaneal(x))\n\nShared(lorie)\n\ntherefore Shared(lorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "Kathrine is prolonged. Kathrine is not remote. Kathrine is humorous. Kathrine is eighteen. Tonie is prolonged. Tonie is not remote. Tonie is not humorous. Tonie is eighteen. Tonie is lupine. Tonie is septal. Linet is incoming. Linet is prolonged. Linet is humorous. Linet is eighteen. Linet is lupine. Linet is septal. If someone is humorous and lupine then they are prolonged. All humorous people are septal. If Linet is remote and Linet is prolonged then Linet is humorous. If Tonie is septal then Tonie is prolonged. If Kathrine is not humorous then Kathrine is remote. If Kathrine is incoming and Kathrine is septal then Kathrine is not remote. Young people are lupine. If someone is remote then they are incoming. Linet is not eighteen.", "logic": "\nProlonged(kathrine)\nnot Remote(kathrine)\nHumorous(kathrine)\nEighteen(kathrine)\nProlonged(tonie)\nnot Remote(tonie)\nnot Humorous(tonie)\nEighteen(tonie)\nLupine(tonie)\nSeptal(tonie)\nIncoming(linet)\nProlonged(linet)\nHumorous(linet)\nEighteen(linet)\nLupine(linet)\nSeptal(linet)\nforall x (Humorous(x) and Lupine(x) -> Prolonged(x))\nforall x (Humorous(x) -> Septal(x))\nRemote(linet) and Prolonged(linet) -> Humorous(linet)\nSeptal(tonie) -> Prolonged(tonie)\nnot Humorous(kathrine) -> Remote(kathrine)\nIncoming(kathrine) and Septal(kathrine) -> not Remote(kathrine)\nforall x (Septal(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Remote(x) -> Incoming(x))\n\nnot Eighteen(linet)\n\ntherefore Eighteen(linet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "Jolie is maidenlike. Jolie is not thai. Jolie is goodly. Jolie is reciprocal. Pascale is maidenlike. Pascale is not thai. Pascale is not goodly. Pascale is reciprocal. Pascale is renewed. Pascale is initiative. Imogen is nighted. Imogen is maidenlike. Imogen is goodly. Imogen is reciprocal. Imogen is renewed. Imogen is initiative. If someone is goodly and renewed then they are maidenlike. All goodly people are initiative. If Imogen is thai and Imogen is maidenlike then Imogen is goodly. If Pascale is initiative then Pascale is maidenlike. If Jolie is not goodly then Jolie is thai. If Jolie is nighted and Jolie is initiative then Jolie is not thai. Young people are renewed. If someone is thai then they are nighted. Jolie is initiative.", "logic": "\nMaidenlike(jolie)\nnot Thai(jolie)\nGoodly(jolie)\nReciprocal(jolie)\nMaidenlike(pascale)\nnot Thai(pascale)\nnot Goodly(pascale)\nReciprocal(pascale)\nRenewed(pascale)\nInitiative(pascale)\nNighted(imogen)\nMaidenlike(imogen)\nGoodly(imogen)\nReciprocal(imogen)\nRenewed(imogen)\nInitiative(imogen)\nforall x (Goodly(x) and Renewed(x) -> Maidenlike(x))\nforall x (Goodly(x) -> Initiative(x))\nThai(imogen) and Maidenlike(imogen) -> Goodly(imogen)\nInitiative(pascale) -> Maidenlike(pascale)\nnot Goodly(jolie) -> Thai(jolie)\nNighted(jolie) and Initiative(jolie) -> not Thai(jolie)\nforall x (Initiative(x) -> Renewed(x))\nforall x (Thai(x) -> Nighted(x))\n\nInitiative(jolie)\n\nGoodly(jolie) and forall x (Goodly(x) -> Initiative(x)) -> therefore Initiative(jolie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "Dominique is necked. Dominique is not crumbly. Dominique is coppery. Dominique is just. Faydra is necked. Faydra is not crumbly. Faydra is not coppery. Faydra is just. Faydra is acapnic. Faydra is overstrung. Jehu is allergenic. Jehu is necked. Jehu is coppery. Jehu is just. Jehu is acapnic. Jehu is overstrung. If someone is coppery and acapnic then they are necked. All coppery people are overstrung. If Jehu is crumbly and Jehu is necked then Jehu is coppery. If Faydra is overstrung then Faydra is necked. If Dominique is not coppery then Dominique is crumbly. If Dominique is allergenic and Dominique is overstrung then Dominique is not crumbly. Young people are acapnic. If someone is crumbly then they are allergenic. Dominique is not overstrung.", "logic": "\nNecked(dominique)\nnot Crumbly(dominique)\nCoppery(dominique)\nJust(dominique)\nNecked(faydra)\nnot Crumbly(faydra)\nnot Coppery(faydra)\nJust(faydra)\nAcapnic(faydra)\nOverstrung(faydra)\nAllergenic(jehu)\nNecked(jehu)\nCoppery(jehu)\nJust(jehu)\nAcapnic(jehu)\nOverstrung(jehu)\nforall x (Coppery(x) and Acapnic(x) -> Necked(x))\nforall x (Coppery(x) -> Overstrung(x))\nCrumbly(jehu) and Necked(jehu) -> Coppery(jehu)\nOverstrung(faydra) -> Necked(faydra)\nnot Coppery(dominique) -> Crumbly(dominique)\nAllergenic(dominique) and Overstrung(dominique) -> not Crumbly(dominique)\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Acapnic(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Allergenic(x))\n\nnot Overstrung(dominique)\n\nCoppery(dominique) and forall x (Coppery(x) -> Overstrung(x)) -> therefore Overstrung(dominique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "Diamond is nonporous. Diamond is not splay. Diamond is humbling. Diamond is xxviii. Adelina is nonporous. Adelina is not splay. Adelina is not humbling. Adelina is xxviii. Adelina is aplanatic. Adelina is chirpy. Muriel is edematous. Muriel is nonporous. Muriel is humbling. Muriel is xxviii. Muriel is aplanatic. Muriel is chirpy. If someone is humbling and aplanatic then they are nonporous. All humbling people are chirpy. If Muriel is splay and Muriel is nonporous then Muriel is humbling. If Adelina is chirpy then Adelina is nonporous. If Diamond is not humbling then Diamond is splay. If Diamond is edematous and Diamond is chirpy then Diamond is not splay. Young people are aplanatic. If someone is splay then they are edematous. Diamond is aplanatic.", "logic": "\nNonporous(diamond)\nnot Splay(diamond)\nHumbling(diamond)\nXxviii(diamond)\nNonporous(adelina)\nnot Splay(adelina)\nnot Humbling(adelina)\nXxviii(adelina)\nAplanatic(adelina)\nChirpy(adelina)\nEdematous(muriel)\nNonporous(muriel)\nHumbling(muriel)\nXxviii(muriel)\nAplanatic(muriel)\nChirpy(muriel)\nforall x (Humbling(x) and Aplanatic(x) -> Nonporous(x))\nforall x (Humbling(x) -> Chirpy(x))\nSplay(muriel) and Nonporous(muriel) -> Humbling(muriel)\nChirpy(adelina) -> Nonporous(adelina)\nnot Humbling(diamond) -> Splay(diamond)\nEdematous(diamond) and Chirpy(diamond) -> not Splay(diamond)\nforall x (Chirpy(x) -> Aplanatic(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) -> Edematous(x))\n\nAplanatic(diamond)\n\nHumbling(diamond) and forall x (Humbling(x) -> Chirpy(x)) -> therefore Chirpy(diamond) Chirpy(diamond) and forall x (Chirpy(x) -> Aplanatic(x)) -> therefore Aplanatic(diamond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "Etti is cytologic. Etti is not awninged. Etti is practical. Etti is gobsmacked. Elana is cytologic. Elana is not awninged. Elana is not practical. Elana is gobsmacked. Elana is arduous. Elana is inept. Isador is iatrogenic. Isador is cytologic. Isador is practical. Isador is gobsmacked. Isador is arduous. Isador is inept. If someone is practical and arduous then they are cytologic. All practical people are inept. If Isador is awninged and Isador is cytologic then Isador is practical. If Elana is inept then Elana is cytologic. If Etti is not practical then Etti is awninged. If Etti is iatrogenic and Etti is inept then Etti is not awninged. Young people are arduous. If someone is awninged then they are iatrogenic. Etti is not arduous.", "logic": "\nCytologic(etti)\nnot Awninged(etti)\nPractical(etti)\nGobsmacked(etti)\nCytologic(elana)\nnot Awninged(elana)\nnot Practical(elana)\nGobsmacked(elana)\nArduous(elana)\nInept(elana)\nIatrogenic(isador)\nCytologic(isador)\nPractical(isador)\nGobsmacked(isador)\nArduous(isador)\nInept(isador)\nforall x (Practical(x) and Arduous(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Practical(x) -> Inept(x))\nAwninged(isador) and Cytologic(isador) -> Practical(isador)\nInept(elana) -> Cytologic(elana)\nnot Practical(etti) -> Awninged(etti)\nIatrogenic(etti) and Inept(etti) -> not Awninged(etti)\nforall x (Inept(x) -> Arduous(x))\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\n\nnot Arduous(etti)\n\nPractical(etti) and forall x (Practical(x) -> Inept(x)) -> therefore Inept(etti) Inept(etti) and forall x (Inept(x) -> Arduous(x)) -> therefore Arduous(etti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "Gilligan is unshared. Gilligan is not dogged. Gilligan is antidotal. Gilligan is careless. Antonio is unshared. Antonio is not dogged. Antonio is not antidotal. Antonio is careless. Antonio is pricey. Antonio is shitty. Salem is rimless. Salem is unshared. Salem is antidotal. Salem is careless. Salem is pricey. Salem is shitty. If someone is antidotal and pricey then they are unshared. All antidotal people are shitty. If Salem is dogged and Salem is unshared then Salem is antidotal. If Antonio is shitty then Antonio is unshared. If Gilligan is not antidotal then Gilligan is dogged. If Gilligan is rimless and Gilligan is shitty then Gilligan is not dogged. Young people are pricey. If someone is dogged then they are rimless. Gilligan is not rimless.", "logic": "\nUnshared(gilligan)\nnot Dogged(gilligan)\nAntidotal(gilligan)\nCareless(gilligan)\nUnshared(antonio)\nnot Dogged(antonio)\nnot Antidotal(antonio)\nCareless(antonio)\nPricey(antonio)\nShitty(antonio)\nRimless(salem)\nUnshared(salem)\nAntidotal(salem)\nCareless(salem)\nPricey(salem)\nShitty(salem)\nforall x (Antidotal(x) and Pricey(x) -> Unshared(x))\nforall x (Antidotal(x) -> Shitty(x))\nDogged(salem) and Unshared(salem) -> Antidotal(salem)\nShitty(antonio) -> Unshared(antonio)\nnot Antidotal(gilligan) -> Dogged(gilligan)\nRimless(gilligan) and Shitty(gilligan) -> not Dogged(gilligan)\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Pricey(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Rimless(x))\n\nnot Rimless(gilligan)\n\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Rimless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "Benn is uppermost. Benn is not resistant. Benn is squinched. Benn is falconine. Tadd is uppermost. Tadd is not resistant. Tadd is not squinched. Tadd is falconine. Tadd is miffed. Tadd is graduate. Giffard is wandering. Giffard is uppermost. Giffard is squinched. Giffard is falconine. Giffard is miffed. Giffard is graduate. If someone is squinched and miffed then they are uppermost. All squinched people are graduate. If Giffard is resistant and Giffard is uppermost then Giffard is squinched. If Tadd is graduate then Tadd is uppermost. If Benn is not squinched then Benn is resistant. If Benn is wandering and Benn is graduate then Benn is not resistant. Young people are miffed. If someone is resistant then they are wandering. Tadd is wandering.", "logic": "\nUppermost(benn)\nnot Resistant(benn)\nSquinched(benn)\nFalconine(benn)\nUppermost(tadd)\nnot Resistant(tadd)\nnot Squinched(tadd)\nFalconine(tadd)\nMiffed(tadd)\nGraduate(tadd)\nWandering(giffard)\nUppermost(giffard)\nSquinched(giffard)\nFalconine(giffard)\nMiffed(giffard)\nGraduate(giffard)\nforall x (Squinched(x) and Miffed(x) -> Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) -> Graduate(x))\nResistant(giffard) and Uppermost(giffard) -> Squinched(giffard)\nGraduate(tadd) -> Uppermost(tadd)\nnot Squinched(benn) -> Resistant(benn)\nWandering(benn) and Graduate(benn) -> not Resistant(benn)\nforall x (Graduate(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Resistant(x) -> Wandering(x))\n\nWandering(tadd)\n\nforall x (Resistant(x) -> Wandering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-632"} {"premises": "The ephraim is semisolid. The genevieve rest the merridie. The merridie rest the ephraim. The ursa rest the ephraim. If someone is xxxviii then they eat the merridie. If someone murder the ursa then the ursa is bareback. If someone rest the ephraim then they need the ursa. If the ursa is packaged then the ursa rest the ephraim. If someone slather the genevieve then they are master. If someone rest the merridie and they do not need the ursa then the merridie slather the genevieve. The genevieve rest the merridie.", "logic": "\nSemisolid(ephraim)\nRest(genevieve, merridie)\nRest(merridie, ephraim)\nRest(ursa, ephraim)\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Rest(x, merridie))\nforall x (Murder(x, ursa) -> Bareback(ursa))\nforall x (Rest(x, ephraim) -> Murder(x, ursa))\nPackaged(ursa) -> Rest(ursa, ephraim)\nforall x (Slather(x, genevieve) -> Master(x))\nforall x (Rest(x, merridie) and not Murder(x, ursa) -> Slather(merridie, genevieve))\n\nRest(genevieve, merridie)\n\ntherefore Rest(genevieve, merridie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The veradis is aliform. The jilli dice the pepi. The pepi dice the veradis. The ola dice the veradis. If someone is audile then they eat the pepi. If someone dispel the ola then the ola is bush. If someone dice the veradis then they need the ola. If the ola is olympic then the ola dice the veradis. If someone synthesise the jilli then they are demeaning. If someone dice the pepi and they do not need the ola then the pepi synthesise the jilli. The jilli does not eat the pepi.", "logic": "\nAliform(veradis)\nDice(jilli, pepi)\nDice(pepi, veradis)\nDice(ola, veradis)\nforall x (Audile(x) -> Dice(x, pepi))\nforall x (Dispel(x, ola) -> Bush(ola))\nforall x (Dice(x, veradis) -> Dispel(x, ola))\nOlympic(ola) -> Dice(ola, veradis)\nforall x (Synthesise(x, jilli) -> Demeaning(x))\nforall x (Dice(x, pepi) and not Dispel(x, ola) -> Synthesise(pepi, jilli))\n\nnot Dice(jilli, pepi)\n\ntherefore Dice(jilli, pepi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The damian is nonresiny. The everard master the tabbie. The tabbie master the damian. The baily master the damian. If someone is carbonylic then they eat the tabbie. If someone lace the baily then the baily is cartesian. If someone master the damian then they need the baily. If the baily is meddling then the baily master the damian. If someone arraign the everard then they are noncausal. If someone master the tabbie and they do not need the baily then the tabbie arraign the everard. The tabbie lace the baily.", "logic": "\nNonresiny(damian)\nMaster(everard, tabbie)\nMaster(tabbie, damian)\nMaster(baily, damian)\nforall x (Carbonylic(x) -> Master(x, tabbie))\nforall x (Lace(x, baily) -> Cartesian(baily))\nforall x (Master(x, damian) -> Lace(x, baily))\nMeddling(baily) -> Master(baily, damian)\nforall x (Arraign(x, everard) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Master(x, tabbie) and not Lace(x, baily) -> Arraign(tabbie, everard))\n\nLace(tabbie, baily)\n\nMaster(tabbie, damian) and forall x (Master(x, damian) -> Lace(x, baily)) -> therefore Lace(tabbie, baily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The hedi is late. The karmen behave the otto. The otto behave the hedi. The moise behave the hedi. If someone is repressive then they eat the otto. If someone bestrew the moise then the moise is ratable. If someone behave the hedi then they need the moise. If the moise is somatic then the moise behave the hedi. If someone practice the karmen then they are unequaled. If someone behave the otto and they do not need the moise then the otto practice the karmen. The moise does not need the moise.", "logic": "\nLate(hedi)\nBehave(karmen, otto)\nBehave(otto, hedi)\nBehave(moise, hedi)\nforall x (Repressive(x) -> Behave(x, otto))\nforall x (Bestrew(x, moise) -> Ratable(moise))\nforall x (Behave(x, hedi) -> Bestrew(x, moise))\nSomatic(moise) -> Behave(moise, hedi)\nforall x (Practice(x, karmen) -> Unequaled(x))\nforall x (Behave(x, otto) and not Bestrew(x, moise) -> Practice(otto, karmen))\n\nnot Bestrew(moise, moise)\n\nBehave(moise, hedi) and forall x (Behave(x, hedi) -> Bestrew(x, moise)) -> therefore Bestrew(moise, moise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The stu is biserrate. The aurilia decolonise the merridie. The merridie decolonise the stu. The amaleta decolonise the stu. If someone is rabbinic then they eat the merridie. If someone metabolise the amaleta then the amaleta is pardonable. If someone decolonise the stu then they need the amaleta. If the amaleta is totemic then the amaleta decolonise the stu. If someone massacre the aurilia then they are advance. If someone decolonise the merridie and they do not need the amaleta then the merridie massacre the aurilia. The amaleta is pardonable.", "logic": "\nBiserrate(stu)\nDecolonise(aurilia, merridie)\nDecolonise(merridie, stu)\nDecolonise(amaleta, stu)\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) -> Decolonise(x, merridie))\nforall x (Metabolise(x, amaleta) -> Pardonable(amaleta))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, stu) -> Metabolise(x, amaleta))\nTotemic(amaleta) -> Decolonise(amaleta, stu)\nforall x (Massacre(x, aurilia) -> Advance(x))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, merridie) and not Metabolise(x, amaleta) -> Massacre(merridie, aurilia))\n\nPardonable(amaleta)\n\nDecolonise(merridie, stu) and forall x (Decolonise(x, stu) -> Metabolise(x, amaleta)) -> therefore Metabolise(merridie, amaleta) Metabolise(merridie, amaleta) and forall x (Metabolise(x, amaleta) -> Pardonable(amaleta)) -> therefore Pardonable(amaleta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The annaliese is weaponless. The everard afforest the orion. The orion afforest the annaliese. The loise afforest the annaliese. If someone is incertain then they eat the orion. If someone mimic the loise then the loise is valueless. If someone afforest the annaliese then they need the loise. If the loise is painful then the loise afforest the annaliese. If someone canalize the everard then they are titled. If someone afforest the orion and they do not need the loise then the orion canalize the everard. The loise is not valueless.", "logic": "\nWeaponless(annaliese)\nAfforest(everard, orion)\nAfforest(orion, annaliese)\nAfforest(loise, annaliese)\nforall x (Incertain(x) -> Afforest(x, orion))\nforall x (Mimic(x, loise) -> Valueless(loise))\nforall x (Afforest(x, annaliese) -> Mimic(x, loise))\nPainful(loise) -> Afforest(loise, annaliese)\nforall x (Canalize(x, everard) -> Titled(x))\nforall x (Afforest(x, orion) and not Mimic(x, loise) -> Canalize(orion, everard))\n\nnot Valueless(loise)\n\nAfforest(orion, annaliese) and forall x (Afforest(x, annaliese) -> Mimic(x, loise)) -> therefore Mimic(orion, loise) Mimic(orion, loise) and forall x (Mimic(x, loise) -> Valueless(loise)) -> therefore Valueless(loise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The patrick is tensed. The osmund anglicize the danyette. The danyette anglicize the patrick. The marigold anglicize the patrick. If someone is squeaking then they eat the danyette. If someone classicize the marigold then the marigold is reflex. If someone anglicize the patrick then they need the marigold. If the marigold is expansile then the marigold anglicize the patrick. If someone rebate the osmund then they are dateable. If someone anglicize the danyette and they do not need the marigold then the danyette rebate the osmund. The marigold is not dateable.", "logic": "\nTensed(patrick)\nAnglicize(osmund, danyette)\nAnglicize(danyette, patrick)\nAnglicize(marigold, patrick)\nforall x (Squeaking(x) -> Anglicize(x, danyette))\nforall x (Classicize(x, marigold) -> Reflex(marigold))\nforall x (Anglicize(x, patrick) -> Classicize(x, marigold))\nExpansile(marigold) -> Anglicize(marigold, patrick)\nforall x (Rebate(x, osmund) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Anglicize(x, danyette) and not Classicize(x, marigold) -> Rebate(danyette, osmund))\n\nnot Dateable(marigold)\n\nforall x (Rebate(x, osmund) -> Dateable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The riane is elvish. The sinclair unroll the lana. The lana unroll the riane. The elfrieda unroll the riane. If someone is plushy then they eat the lana. If someone sever the elfrieda then the elfrieda is heavenly. If someone unroll the riane then they need the elfrieda. If the elfrieda is diffuse then the elfrieda unroll the riane. If someone microcopy the sinclair then they are vixenish. If someone unroll the lana and they do not need the elfrieda then the lana microcopy the sinclair. The lana is vixenish.", "logic": "\nElvish(riane)\nUnroll(sinclair, lana)\nUnroll(lana, riane)\nUnroll(elfrieda, riane)\nforall x (Plushy(x) -> Unroll(x, lana))\nforall x (Sever(x, elfrieda) -> Heavenly(elfrieda))\nforall x (Unroll(x, riane) -> Sever(x, elfrieda))\nDiffuse(elfrieda) -> Unroll(elfrieda, riane)\nforall x (Microcopy(x, sinclair) -> Vixenish(x))\nforall x (Unroll(x, lana) and not Sever(x, elfrieda) -> Microcopy(lana, sinclair))\n\nVixenish(lana)\n\nforall x (Microcopy(x, sinclair) -> Vixenish(x)) <- forall x (Unroll(x, lana) and not Sever(x, elfrieda) -> Microcopy(lana, sinclair)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The alane is auriculate. The ramona discount the ethel. The ethel discount the alane. The giorgio discount the alane. If someone is lite then they eat the ethel. If someone rase the giorgio then the giorgio is amblyopic. If someone discount the alane then they need the giorgio. If the giorgio is thievish then the giorgio discount the alane. If someone praise the ramona then they are wrecked. If someone discount the ethel and they do not need the giorgio then the ethel praise the ramona. The ethel does not eat the ethel.", "logic": "\nAuriculate(alane)\nDiscount(ramona, ethel)\nDiscount(ethel, alane)\nDiscount(giorgio, alane)\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Discount(x, ethel))\nforall x (Rase(x, giorgio) -> Amblyopic(giorgio))\nforall x (Discount(x, alane) -> Rase(x, giorgio))\nThievish(giorgio) -> Discount(giorgio, alane)\nforall x (Praise(x, ramona) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Discount(x, ethel) and not Rase(x, giorgio) -> Praise(ethel, ramona))\n\nnot Discount(ethel, ethel)\n\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Discount(x, ethel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The harri is fucking. The eduard sedate the jacob. The jacob sedate the harri. The lanny sedate the harri. If someone is seminal then they eat the jacob. If someone prompt the lanny then the lanny is colonnaded. If someone sedate the harri then they need the lanny. If the lanny is tautologic then the lanny sedate the harri. If someone repress the eduard then they are enforced. If someone sedate the jacob and they do not need the lanny then the jacob repress the eduard. The eduard repress the harri.", "logic": "\nFucking(harri)\nSedate(eduard, jacob)\nSedate(jacob, harri)\nSedate(lanny, harri)\nforall x (Seminal(x) -> Sedate(x, jacob))\nforall x (Prompt(x, lanny) -> Colonnaded(lanny))\nforall x (Sedate(x, harri) -> Prompt(x, lanny))\nTautologic(lanny) -> Sedate(lanny, harri)\nforall x (Repress(x, eduard) -> Enforced(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x, jacob) and not Prompt(x, lanny) -> Repress(jacob, eduard))\n\nRepress(eduard, harri)\n\nRepress(eduard, harri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The rupert is propellant. The jeni school the ailene. The ailene school the rupert. The dacey school the rupert. If someone is synergetic then they eat the ailene. If someone aromatise the dacey then the dacey is front. If someone school the rupert then they need the dacey. If the dacey is congeneric then the dacey school the rupert. If someone reconcile the jeni then they are perceptive. If someone school the ailene and they do not need the dacey then the ailene reconcile the jeni. The rupert does not like the dacey.", "logic": "\nPropellant(rupert)\nSchool(jeni, ailene)\nSchool(ailene, rupert)\nSchool(dacey, rupert)\nforall x (Synergetic(x) -> School(x, ailene))\nforall x (Aromatise(x, dacey) -> Front(dacey))\nforall x (School(x, rupert) -> Aromatise(x, dacey))\nCongeneric(dacey) -> School(dacey, rupert)\nforall x (Reconcile(x, jeni) -> Perceptive(x))\nforall x (School(x, ailene) and not Aromatise(x, dacey) -> Reconcile(ailene, jeni))\n\nnot Reconcile(rupert, dacey)\n\nnot Reconcile(rupert, dacey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The kandace is pulverized. The sharai exercise the marni. The marni exercise the kandace. The vere exercise the kandace. If someone is oncologic then they eat the marni. If someone hectograph the vere then the vere is neoliberal. If someone exercise the kandace then they need the vere. If the vere is chivalrous then the vere exercise the kandace. If someone thieve the sharai then they are estimable. If someone exercise the marni and they do not need the vere then the marni thieve the sharai. The sharai hectograph the sharai.", "logic": "\nPulverized(kandace)\nExercise(sharai, marni)\nExercise(marni, kandace)\nExercise(vere, kandace)\nforall x (Oncologic(x) -> Exercise(x, marni))\nforall x (Hectograph(x, vere) -> Neoliberal(vere))\nforall x (Exercise(x, kandace) -> Hectograph(x, vere))\nChivalrous(vere) -> Exercise(vere, kandace)\nforall x (Thieve(x, sharai) -> Estimable(x))\nforall x (Exercise(x, marni) and not Hectograph(x, vere) -> Thieve(marni, sharai))\n\nHectograph(sharai, sharai)\n\nHectograph(sharai, sharai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The sibby is not abominable. The sibby is xxiv. The sibby steel the magda. The sibby disapprove the rudolf. The rudolf is abominable. The rudolf is unsnarled. The sophie slam the rudolf. The sophie disapprove the sibby. The sophie does not visit the magda. The magda is unjointed. The magda steel the sophie. The magda disapprove the sibby. All unsnarled people are unjointed. If someone is unjointed then they like the rudolf. The sophie does not visit the magda.", "logic": "\nnot Abominable(sibby)\nXxiv(sibby)\nSteel(sibby, magda)\nDisapprove(sibby, rudolf)\nAbominable(rudolf)\nUnsnarled(rudolf)\nSlam(sophie, rudolf)\nDisapprove(sophie, sibby)\nnot Disapprove(sophie, magda)\nUnjointed(magda)\nSteel(magda, sophie)\nDisapprove(magda, sibby)\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Unjointed(x) -> Steel(x, rudolf))\n\nnot Disapprove(sophie, magda)\n\ntherefore not Disapprove(sophie, magda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The lacee is not clathrate. The lacee is none. The lacee image the myrtie. The lacee broadside the jud. The jud is clathrate. The jud is offshore. The edithe cloak the jud. The edithe broadside the lacee. The edithe does not visit the myrtie. The myrtie is assured. The myrtie image the edithe. The myrtie broadside the lacee. All offshore people are assured. If someone is assured then they like the jud. The edithe does not visit the lacee.", "logic": "\nnot Clathrate(lacee)\nNone(lacee)\nImage(lacee, myrtie)\nBroadside(lacee, jud)\nClathrate(jud)\nOffshore(jud)\nCloak(edithe, jud)\nBroadside(edithe, lacee)\nnot Broadside(edithe, myrtie)\nAssured(myrtie)\nImage(myrtie, edithe)\nBroadside(myrtie, lacee)\nforall x (Offshore(x) -> Assured(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Image(x, jud))\n\nnot Broadside(edithe, lacee)\n\ntherefore Broadside(edithe, lacee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The loraine is not incognito. The loraine is delinquent. The loraine snowshoe the audi. The loraine dive the jodi. The jodi is incognito. The jodi is attentive. The debor drum the jodi. The debor dive the loraine. The debor does not visit the audi. The audi is sceptical. The audi snowshoe the debor. The audi dive the loraine. All attentive people are sceptical. If someone is sceptical then they like the jodi. The jodi is sceptical.", "logic": "\nnot Incognito(loraine)\nDelinquent(loraine)\nSnowshoe(loraine, audi)\nDive(loraine, jodi)\nIncognito(jodi)\nAttentive(jodi)\nDrum(debor, jodi)\nDive(debor, loraine)\nnot Dive(debor, audi)\nSceptical(audi)\nSnowshoe(audi, debor)\nDive(audi, loraine)\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Sceptical(x))\nforall x (Sceptical(x) -> Snowshoe(x, jodi))\n\nSceptical(jodi)\n\nAttentive(jodi) and forall x (Attentive(x) -> Sceptical(x)) -> therefore Sceptical(jodi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The erda is not grumbling. The erda is unwounded. The erda befriend the caro. The erda devilize the osbourne. The osbourne is grumbling. The osbourne is immotile. The sigfrid hurry the osbourne. The sigfrid devilize the erda. The sigfrid does not visit the caro. The caro is sapless. The caro befriend the sigfrid. The caro devilize the erda. All immotile people are sapless. If someone is sapless then they like the osbourne. The caro does not like the osbourne.", "logic": "\nnot Grumbling(erda)\nUnwounded(erda)\nBefriend(erda, caro)\nDevilize(erda, osbourne)\nGrumbling(osbourne)\nImmotile(osbourne)\nHurry(sigfrid, osbourne)\nDevilize(sigfrid, erda)\nnot Devilize(sigfrid, caro)\nSapless(caro)\nBefriend(caro, sigfrid)\nDevilize(caro, erda)\nforall x (Immotile(x) -> Sapless(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Befriend(x, osbourne))\n\nnot Befriend(caro, osbourne)\n\nSapless(caro) and forall x (Sapless(x) -> Befriend(x, osbourne)) -> therefore Befriend(caro, osbourne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The averyl is not insulting. The averyl is outbound. The averyl array the noe. The averyl disapprove the padraig. The padraig is insulting. The padraig is downcast. The pyotr paralyse the padraig. The pyotr disapprove the averyl. The pyotr does not visit the noe. The noe is fumed. The noe array the pyotr. The noe disapprove the averyl. All downcast people are fumed. If someone is fumed then they like the padraig. The padraig array the padraig.", "logic": "\nnot Insulting(averyl)\nOutbound(averyl)\nArray(averyl, noe)\nDisapprove(averyl, padraig)\nInsulting(padraig)\nDowncast(padraig)\nParalyse(pyotr, padraig)\nDisapprove(pyotr, averyl)\nnot Disapprove(pyotr, noe)\nFumed(noe)\nArray(noe, pyotr)\nDisapprove(noe, averyl)\nforall x (Downcast(x) -> Fumed(x))\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Array(x, padraig))\n\nArray(padraig, padraig)\n\nDowncast(padraig) and forall x (Downcast(x) -> Fumed(x)) -> therefore Fumed(padraig) Fumed(padraig) and forall x (Fumed(x) -> Array(x, padraig)) -> therefore Array(padraig, padraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The bonnee is not jade. The bonnee is barbecued. The bonnee advocate the helmuth. The bonnee canonize the shepard. The shepard is jade. The shepard is hebrew. The mercedes invaginate the shepard. The mercedes canonize the bonnee. The mercedes does not visit the helmuth. The helmuth is predacious. The helmuth advocate the mercedes. The helmuth canonize the bonnee. All hebrew people are predacious. If someone is predacious then they like the shepard. The shepard does not like the shepard.", "logic": "\nnot Jade(bonnee)\nBarbecued(bonnee)\nAdvocate(bonnee, helmuth)\nCanonize(bonnee, shepard)\nJade(shepard)\nHebrew(shepard)\nInvaginate(mercedes, shepard)\nCanonize(mercedes, bonnee)\nnot Canonize(mercedes, helmuth)\nPredacious(helmuth)\nAdvocate(helmuth, mercedes)\nCanonize(helmuth, bonnee)\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Predacious(x))\nforall x (Predacious(x) -> Advocate(x, shepard))\n\nnot Advocate(shepard, shepard)\n\nHebrew(shepard) and forall x (Hebrew(x) -> Predacious(x)) -> therefore Predacious(shepard) Predacious(shepard) and forall x (Predacious(x) -> Advocate(x, shepard)) -> therefore Advocate(shepard, shepard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The elfrieda is not neuralgic. The elfrieda is insurable. The elfrieda egest the annadiane. The elfrieda tell the pearl. The pearl is neuralgic. The pearl is roan. The eliza advocate the pearl. The eliza tell the elfrieda. The eliza does not visit the annadiane. The annadiane is incurved. The annadiane egest the eliza. The annadiane tell the elfrieda. All roan people are incurved. If someone is incurved then they like the pearl. The elfrieda does not like the pearl.", "logic": "\nnot Neuralgic(elfrieda)\nInsurable(elfrieda)\nEgest(elfrieda, annadiane)\nTell(elfrieda, pearl)\nNeuralgic(pearl)\nRoan(pearl)\nAdvocate(eliza, pearl)\nTell(eliza, elfrieda)\nnot Tell(eliza, annadiane)\nIncurved(annadiane)\nEgest(annadiane, eliza)\nTell(annadiane, elfrieda)\nforall x (Roan(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Egest(x, pearl))\n\nnot Egest(elfrieda, pearl)\n\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Egest(x, pearl)) <- forall x (Roan(x) -> Incurved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The lucas is not indecent. The lucas is antibiotic. The lucas overwork the bing. The lucas down the scott. The scott is indecent. The scott is alkahestic. The karia birch the scott. The karia down the lucas. The karia does not visit the bing. The bing is odourless. The bing overwork the karia. The bing down the lucas. All alkahestic people are odourless. If someone is odourless then they like the scott. The karia overwork the scott.", "logic": "\nnot Indecent(lucas)\nAntibiotic(lucas)\nOverwork(lucas, bing)\nDown(lucas, scott)\nIndecent(scott)\nAlkahestic(scott)\nBirch(karia, scott)\nDown(karia, lucas)\nnot Down(karia, bing)\nOdourless(bing)\nOverwork(bing, karia)\nDown(bing, lucas)\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) -> Odourless(x))\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Overwork(x, scott))\n\nOverwork(karia, scott)\n\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Overwork(x, scott)) <- forall x (Alkahestic(x) -> Odourless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The colleen is not protozoal. The colleen is jural. The colleen summate the kathryne. The colleen agitate the idalia. The idalia is protozoal. The idalia is surmisable. The frans fagot the idalia. The frans agitate the colleen. The frans does not visit the kathryne. The kathryne is doltish. The kathryne summate the frans. The kathryne agitate the colleen. All surmisable people are doltish. If someone is doltish then they like the idalia. The frans is not doltish.", "logic": "\nnot Protozoal(colleen)\nJural(colleen)\nSummate(colleen, kathryne)\nAgitate(colleen, idalia)\nProtozoal(idalia)\nSurmisable(idalia)\nFagot(frans, idalia)\nAgitate(frans, colleen)\nnot Agitate(frans, kathryne)\nDoltish(kathryne)\nSummate(kathryne, frans)\nAgitate(kathryne, colleen)\nforall x (Surmisable(x) -> Doltish(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) -> Summate(x, idalia))\n\nnot Doltish(frans)\n\nforall x (Surmisable(x) -> Doltish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The minerva is not diffuse. The minerva is botanic. The minerva depreciate the ethelind. The minerva inculpate the jacki. The jacki is diffuse. The jacki is numerate. The tybi malnourish the jacki. The tybi inculpate the minerva. The tybi does not visit the ethelind. The ethelind is million. The ethelind depreciate the tybi. The ethelind inculpate the minerva. All numerate people are million. If someone is million then they like the jacki. The tybi is diffuse.", "logic": "\nnot Diffuse(minerva)\nBotanic(minerva)\nDepreciate(minerva, ethelind)\nInculpate(minerva, jacki)\nDiffuse(jacki)\nNumerate(jacki)\nMalnourish(tybi, jacki)\nInculpate(tybi, minerva)\nnot Inculpate(tybi, ethelind)\nMillion(ethelind)\nDepreciate(ethelind, tybi)\nInculpate(ethelind, minerva)\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> Million(x))\nforall x (Million(x) -> Depreciate(x, jacki))\n\nDiffuse(tybi)\n\nDiffuse(tybi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The cele is not cumuliform. The cele is restful. The cele true the cathryn. The cele satisfise the hill. The hill is cumuliform. The hill is alienated. The romola jabber the hill. The romola satisfise the cele. The romola does not visit the cathryn. The cathryn is broadside. The cathryn true the romola. The cathryn satisfise the cele. All alienated people are broadside. If someone is broadside then they like the hill. The hill does not visit the cele.", "logic": "\nnot Cumuliform(cele)\nRestful(cele)\nTrue(cele, cathryn)\nSatisfise(cele, hill)\nCumuliform(hill)\nAlienated(hill)\nJabber(romola, hill)\nSatisfise(romola, cele)\nnot Satisfise(romola, cathryn)\nBroadside(cathryn)\nTrue(cathryn, romola)\nSatisfise(cathryn, cele)\nforall x (Alienated(x) -> Broadside(x))\nforall x (Broadside(x) -> True(x, hill))\n\nnot Satisfise(hill, cele)\n\nnot Satisfise(hill, cele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "The wilona is not hybrid. The wilona is slipshod. The wilona lather the frederic. The wilona solemnise the maxim. The maxim is hybrid. The maxim is mild. The trix profess the maxim. The trix solemnise the wilona. The trix does not visit the frederic. The frederic is miotic. The frederic lather the trix. The frederic solemnise the wilona. All mild people are miotic. If someone is miotic then they like the maxim. The frederic solemnise the frederic.", "logic": "\nnot Hybrid(wilona)\nSlipshod(wilona)\nLather(wilona, frederic)\nSolemnise(wilona, maxim)\nHybrid(maxim)\nMild(maxim)\nProfess(trix, maxim)\nSolemnise(trix, wilona)\nnot Solemnise(trix, frederic)\nMiotic(frederic)\nLather(frederic, trix)\nSolemnise(frederic, wilona)\nforall x (Mild(x) -> Miotic(x))\nforall x (Miotic(x) -> Lather(x, maxim))\n\nSolemnise(frederic, frederic)\n\nSolemnise(frederic, frederic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-593"} {"premises": "Damara is stealthy. Damara is mephitic. Damara is meteoric. Damara is raucous. Damara is disabled. Gratia is stealthy. Gratia is mephitic. Gratia is meteoric. Gratia is caddish. Gratia is raucous. Gratia is hydrated. Gratia is disabled. If something is stealthy then it is meteoric. Furry things are raucous. If something is raucous and hydrated then it is disabled. White, raucous things are meteoric. Quiet things are caddish. If Damara is mephitic and Damara is caddish then Damara is hydrated. Damara is mephitic.", "logic": "\nStealthy(damara)\nMephitic(damara)\nMeteoric(damara)\nRaucous(damara)\nDisabled(damara)\nStealthy(gratia)\nMephitic(gratia)\nMeteoric(gratia)\nCaddish(gratia)\nRaucous(gratia)\nHydrated(gratia)\nDisabled(gratia)\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Meteoric(x))\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Raucous(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) and Hydrated(x) -> Disabled(x))\nforall x (Hydrated(x) and Raucous(x) -> Meteoric(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) -> Caddish(x))\nMephitic(damara) and Caddish(damara) -> Hydrated(damara)\n\nMephitic(damara)\n\ntherefore Mephitic(damara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-381"} {"premises": "Kennedy is billionth. Kennedy is seedy. Kennedy is hispanic. Kennedy is silvery. Kennedy is thalloid. Britni is billionth. Britni is seedy. Britni is hispanic. Britni is modest. Britni is silvery. Britni is penciled. Britni is thalloid. If something is billionth then it is hispanic. Furry things are silvery. If something is silvery and penciled then it is thalloid. White, silvery things are hispanic. Quiet things are modest. If Kennedy is seedy and Kennedy is modest then Kennedy is penciled. Kennedy is not hispanic.", "logic": "\nBillionth(kennedy)\nSeedy(kennedy)\nHispanic(kennedy)\nSilvery(kennedy)\nThalloid(kennedy)\nBillionth(britni)\nSeedy(britni)\nHispanic(britni)\nModest(britni)\nSilvery(britni)\nPenciled(britni)\nThalloid(britni)\nforall x (Billionth(x) -> Hispanic(x))\nforall x (Billionth(x) -> Silvery(x))\nforall x (Silvery(x) and Penciled(x) -> Thalloid(x))\nforall x (Penciled(x) and Silvery(x) -> Hispanic(x))\nforall x (Hispanic(x) -> Modest(x))\nSeedy(kennedy) and Modest(kennedy) -> Penciled(kennedy)\n\nnot Hispanic(kennedy)\n\ntherefore Hispanic(kennedy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-381"} {"premises": "Aurelie is northmost. Aurelie is quondam. Aurelie is flocculent. Aurelie is bifacial. Aurelie is unsworn. Ambrosi is northmost. Ambrosi is quondam. Ambrosi is flocculent. Ambrosi is clxxv. Ambrosi is bifacial. Ambrosi is quadratic. Ambrosi is unsworn. If something is northmost then it is flocculent. Furry things are bifacial. If something is bifacial and quadratic then it is unsworn. White, bifacial things are flocculent. Quiet things are clxxv. If Aurelie is quondam and Aurelie is clxxv then Aurelie is quadratic. Aurelie is clxxv.", "logic": "\nNorthmost(aurelie)\nQuondam(aurelie)\nFlocculent(aurelie)\nBifacial(aurelie)\nUnsworn(aurelie)\nNorthmost(ambrosi)\nQuondam(ambrosi)\nFlocculent(ambrosi)\nClxxv(ambrosi)\nBifacial(ambrosi)\nQuadratic(ambrosi)\nUnsworn(ambrosi)\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Flocculent(x))\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Bifacial(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Quadratic(x) -> Unsworn(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) and Bifacial(x) -> Flocculent(x))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Clxxv(x))\nQuondam(aurelie) and Clxxv(aurelie) -> Quadratic(aurelie)\n\nClxxv(aurelie)\n\nFlocculent(aurelie) and forall x (Flocculent(x) -> Clxxv(x)) -> therefore Clxxv(aurelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-381"} {"premises": "Tabitha is colorful. Tabitha is bulbous. Tabitha is marginal. Tabitha is epidemic. Tabitha is eighteen. Eliot is colorful. Eliot is bulbous. Eliot is marginal. Eliot is ignorant. Eliot is epidemic. Eliot is carboxyl. Eliot is eighteen. If something is colorful then it is marginal. Furry things are epidemic. If something is epidemic and carboxyl then it is eighteen. White, epidemic things are marginal. Quiet things are ignorant. If Tabitha is bulbous and Tabitha is ignorant then Tabitha is carboxyl. Tabitha is not ignorant.", "logic": "\nColorful(tabitha)\nBulbous(tabitha)\nMarginal(tabitha)\nEpidemic(tabitha)\nEighteen(tabitha)\nColorful(eliot)\nBulbous(eliot)\nMarginal(eliot)\nIgnorant(eliot)\nEpidemic(eliot)\nCarboxyl(eliot)\nEighteen(eliot)\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Epidemic(x))\nforall x (Epidemic(x) and Carboxyl(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Carboxyl(x) and Epidemic(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) -> Ignorant(x))\nBulbous(tabitha) and Ignorant(tabitha) -> Carboxyl(tabitha)\n\nnot Ignorant(tabitha)\n\nMarginal(tabitha) and forall x (Marginal(x) -> Ignorant(x)) -> therefore Ignorant(tabitha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-381"} {"premises": "Ezra is seaborne. Ezra is weensy. Ezra is unreformed. Ezra is leadless. Ezra is clitoric. Vida is seaborne. Vida is weensy. Vida is unreformed. Vida is appetizing. Vida is leadless. Vida is rude. Vida is clitoric. If something is seaborne then it is unreformed. Furry things are leadless. If something is leadless and rude then it is clitoric. White, leadless things are unreformed. Quiet things are appetizing. If Ezra is weensy and Ezra is appetizing then Ezra is rude. Ezra is rude.", "logic": "\nSeaborne(ezra)\nWeensy(ezra)\nUnreformed(ezra)\nLeadless(ezra)\nClitoric(ezra)\nSeaborne(vida)\nWeensy(vida)\nUnreformed(vida)\nAppetizing(vida)\nLeadless(vida)\nRude(vida)\nClitoric(vida)\nforall x (Seaborne(x) -> Unreformed(x))\nforall x (Seaborne(x) -> Leadless(x))\nforall x (Leadless(x) and Rude(x) -> Clitoric(x))\nforall x (Rude(x) and Leadless(x) -> Unreformed(x))\nforall x (Unreformed(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nWeensy(ezra) and Appetizing(ezra) -> Rude(ezra)\n\nRude(ezra)\n\nUnreformed(ezra) and forall x (Unreformed(x) -> Appetizing(x)) -> therefore Appetizing(ezra) Weensy(ezra) and Appetizing(ezra) and Weensy(ezra) and Appetizing(ezra) -> Rude(ezra) -> therefore Rude(ezra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-381"} {"premises": "Hettie is brindle. Hettie is argive. Hettie is thrilling. Hettie is dutiful. Hettie is thievish. Zippy is brindle. Zippy is argive. Zippy is thrilling. Zippy is sole. Zippy is dutiful. Zippy is countywide. Zippy is thievish. If something is brindle then it is thrilling. Furry things are dutiful. If something is dutiful and countywide then it is thievish. White, dutiful things are thrilling. Quiet things are sole. If Hettie is argive and Hettie is sole then Hettie is countywide. Hettie is not countywide.", "logic": "\nBrindle(hettie)\nArgive(hettie)\nThrilling(hettie)\nDutiful(hettie)\nThievish(hettie)\nBrindle(zippy)\nArgive(zippy)\nThrilling(zippy)\nSole(zippy)\nDutiful(zippy)\nCountywide(zippy)\nThievish(zippy)\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Dutiful(x) and Countywide(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Countywide(x) and Dutiful(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Sole(x))\nArgive(hettie) and Sole(hettie) -> Countywide(hettie)\n\nnot Countywide(hettie)\n\nThrilling(hettie) and forall x (Thrilling(x) -> Sole(x)) -> therefore Sole(hettie) Argive(hettie) and Sole(hettie) and Argive(hettie) and Sole(hettie) -> Countywide(hettie) -> therefore Countywide(hettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-381"} {"premises": "The cara is acquainted. The cara is anabiotic. The cara is unscalable. The cara is beholden. The cara effectuate the myles. The cara iterate the myles. The cara calcimine the myles. The myles is acquainted. The myles is anabiotic. The myles is unscalable. The myles is beholden. The myles calcimine the cara. If something is anabiotic and it calcimine the myles then it iterate the cara. If something iterate the cara and it effectuate the myles then the cara is peroneal. The cara calcimine the myles.", "logic": "\nAcquainted(cara)\nAnabiotic(cara)\nUnscalable(cara)\nBeholden(cara)\nEffectuate(cara, myles)\nIterate(cara, myles)\nCalcimine(cara, myles)\nAcquainted(myles)\nAnabiotic(myles)\nUnscalable(myles)\nBeholden(myles)\nCalcimine(myles, cara)\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and Calcimine(x, myles) -> Iterate(x, cara))\nforall x (Iterate(x, cara) and Effectuate(x, myles) -> Peroneal(cara))\n\nCalcimine(cara, myles)\n\ntherefore Calcimine(cara, myles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The marita is dozen. The marita is middle. The marita is insightful. The marita is coloured. The marita sneak the lewis. The marita infer the lewis. The marita jest the lewis. The lewis is dozen. The lewis is middle. The lewis is insightful. The lewis is coloured. The lewis jest the marita. If something is middle and it jest the lewis then it infer the marita. If something infer the marita and it sneak the lewis then the marita is mucose. The lewis is not insightful.", "logic": "\nDozen(marita)\nMiddle(marita)\nInsightful(marita)\nColoured(marita)\nSneak(marita, lewis)\nInfer(marita, lewis)\nJest(marita, lewis)\nDozen(lewis)\nMiddle(lewis)\nInsightful(lewis)\nColoured(lewis)\nJest(lewis, marita)\nforall x (Middle(x) and Jest(x, lewis) -> Infer(x, marita))\nforall x (Infer(x, marita) and Sneak(x, lewis) -> Mucose(marita))\n\nnot Insightful(lewis)\n\ntherefore Insightful(lewis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The gracia is reassuring. The gracia is compounded. The gracia is foolish. The gracia is wizardly. The gracia terrorise the midge. The gracia conciliate the midge. The gracia depreciate the midge. The midge is reassuring. The midge is compounded. The midge is foolish. The midge is wizardly. The midge depreciate the gracia. If something is compounded and it depreciate the midge then it conciliate the gracia. If something conciliate the gracia and it terrorise the midge then the gracia is usurious. The gracia conciliate the gracia.", "logic": "\nReassuring(gracia)\nCompounded(gracia)\nFoolish(gracia)\nWizardly(gracia)\nTerrorise(gracia, midge)\nConciliate(gracia, midge)\nDepreciate(gracia, midge)\nReassuring(midge)\nCompounded(midge)\nFoolish(midge)\nWizardly(midge)\nDepreciate(midge, gracia)\nforall x (Compounded(x) and Depreciate(x, midge) -> Conciliate(x, gracia))\nforall x (Conciliate(x, gracia) and Terrorise(x, midge) -> Usurious(gracia))\n\nConciliate(gracia, gracia)\n\nCompounded(gracia) and Depreciate(gracia, midge) and forall x (Compounded(x) and Depreciate(x, midge) -> Conciliate(x, gracia)) -> therefore Conciliate(gracia, gracia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The colline is effete. The colline is seventeen. The colline is tubercular. The colline is genetic. The colline rhyme the edwina. The colline inscribe the edwina. The colline inform the edwina. The edwina is effete. The edwina is seventeen. The edwina is tubercular. The edwina is genetic. The edwina inform the colline. If something is seventeen and it inform the edwina then it inscribe the colline. If something inscribe the colline and it rhyme the edwina then the colline is southward. The colline does not see the colline.", "logic": "\nEffete(colline)\nSeventeen(colline)\nTubercular(colline)\nGenetic(colline)\nRhyme(colline, edwina)\nInscribe(colline, edwina)\nInform(colline, edwina)\nEffete(edwina)\nSeventeen(edwina)\nTubercular(edwina)\nGenetic(edwina)\nInform(edwina, colline)\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and Inform(x, edwina) -> Inscribe(x, colline))\nforall x (Inscribe(x, colline) and Rhyme(x, edwina) -> Southward(colline))\n\nnot Inscribe(colline, colline)\n\nSeventeen(colline) and Inform(colline, edwina) and forall x (Seventeen(x) and Inform(x, edwina) -> Inscribe(x, colline)) -> therefore Inscribe(colline, colline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The rudyard is herculean. The rudyard is placative. The rudyard is hindmost. The rudyard is webbed. The rudyard love the caril. The rudyard reschedule the caril. The rudyard bewail the caril. The caril is herculean. The caril is placative. The caril is hindmost. The caril is webbed. The caril bewail the rudyard. If something is placative and it bewail the caril then it reschedule the rudyard. If something reschedule the rudyard and it love the caril then the rudyard is nitric. The rudyard is nitric.", "logic": "\nHerculean(rudyard)\nPlacative(rudyard)\nHindmost(rudyard)\nWebbed(rudyard)\nLove(rudyard, caril)\nReschedule(rudyard, caril)\nBewail(rudyard, caril)\nHerculean(caril)\nPlacative(caril)\nHindmost(caril)\nWebbed(caril)\nBewail(caril, rudyard)\nforall x (Placative(x) and Bewail(x, caril) -> Reschedule(x, rudyard))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, rudyard) and Love(x, caril) -> Nitric(rudyard))\n\nNitric(rudyard)\n\nPlacative(rudyard) and Bewail(rudyard, caril) and forall x (Placative(x) and Bewail(x, caril) -> Reschedule(x, rudyard)) -> therefore Reschedule(rudyard, rudyard) Reschedule(rudyard, rudyard) and Love(rudyard, caril) and forall x (Reschedule(x, rudyard) and Love(x, caril) -> Nitric(rudyard)) -> therefore Nitric(rudyard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The harri is standby. The harri is retral. The harri is braw. The harri is tripping. The harri chariot the amalie. The harri malt the amalie. The harri cavort the amalie. The amalie is standby. The amalie is retral. The amalie is braw. The amalie is tripping. The amalie cavort the harri. If something is retral and it cavort the amalie then it malt the harri. If something malt the harri and it chariot the amalie then the harri is gauzy. The harri is not gauzy.", "logic": "\nStandby(harri)\nRetral(harri)\nBraw(harri)\nTripping(harri)\nChariot(harri, amalie)\nMalt(harri, amalie)\nCavort(harri, amalie)\nStandby(amalie)\nRetral(amalie)\nBraw(amalie)\nTripping(amalie)\nCavort(amalie, harri)\nforall x (Retral(x) and Cavort(x, amalie) -> Malt(x, harri))\nforall x (Malt(x, harri) and Chariot(x, amalie) -> Gauzy(harri))\n\nnot Gauzy(harri)\n\nRetral(harri) and Cavort(harri, amalie) and forall x (Retral(x) and Cavort(x, amalie) -> Malt(x, harri)) -> therefore Malt(harri, harri) Malt(harri, harri) and Chariot(harri, amalie) and forall x (Malt(x, harri) and Chariot(x, amalie) -> Gauzy(harri)) -> therefore Gauzy(harri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The mari is unmeasured. The mari is worthwhile. The mari is scrivened. The mari is spectral. The mari mope the chrissa. The mari sibilate the chrissa. The mari institute the chrissa. The chrissa is unmeasured. The chrissa is worthwhile. The chrissa is scrivened. The chrissa is spectral. The chrissa institute the mari. If something is worthwhile and it institute the chrissa then it sibilate the mari. If something sibilate the mari and it mope the chrissa then the mari is provincial. The chrissa does not see the mari.", "logic": "\nUnmeasured(mari)\nWorthwhile(mari)\nScrivened(mari)\nSpectral(mari)\nMope(mari, chrissa)\nSibilate(mari, chrissa)\nInstitute(mari, chrissa)\nUnmeasured(chrissa)\nWorthwhile(chrissa)\nScrivened(chrissa)\nSpectral(chrissa)\nInstitute(chrissa, mari)\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) and Institute(x, chrissa) -> Sibilate(x, mari))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, mari) and Mope(x, chrissa) -> Provincial(mari))\n\nnot Sibilate(chrissa, mari)\n\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) and Institute(x, chrissa) -> Sibilate(x, mari)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The hilarie is unselfish. The hilarie is estranging. The hilarie is wearisome. The hilarie is wholesome. The hilarie founder the chelsea. The hilarie skirl the chelsea. The hilarie open the chelsea. The chelsea is unselfish. The chelsea is estranging. The chelsea is wearisome. The chelsea is wholesome. The chelsea open the hilarie. If something is estranging and it open the chelsea then it skirl the hilarie. If something skirl the hilarie and it founder the chelsea then the hilarie is antitoxic. The hilarie founder the hilarie.", "logic": "\nUnselfish(hilarie)\nEstranging(hilarie)\nWearisome(hilarie)\nWholesome(hilarie)\nFounder(hilarie, chelsea)\nSkirl(hilarie, chelsea)\nOpen(hilarie, chelsea)\nUnselfish(chelsea)\nEstranging(chelsea)\nWearisome(chelsea)\nWholesome(chelsea)\nOpen(chelsea, hilarie)\nforall x (Estranging(x) and Open(x, chelsea) -> Skirl(x, hilarie))\nforall x (Skirl(x, hilarie) and Founder(x, chelsea) -> Antitoxic(hilarie))\n\nFounder(hilarie, hilarie)\n\nFounder(hilarie, hilarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The grayce is subduable. The grayce is flint. The grayce is riblike. The grayce is slapdash. The grayce decoke the mason. The grayce smear the mason. The grayce capsulate the mason. The mason is subduable. The mason is flint. The mason is riblike. The mason is slapdash. The mason capsulate the grayce. If something is flint and it capsulate the mason then it smear the grayce. If something smear the grayce and it decoke the mason then the grayce is sevenfold. The mason does not need the grayce.", "logic": "\nSubduable(grayce)\nFlint(grayce)\nRiblike(grayce)\nSlapdash(grayce)\nDecoke(grayce, mason)\nSmear(grayce, mason)\nCapsulate(grayce, mason)\nSubduable(mason)\nFlint(mason)\nRiblike(mason)\nSlapdash(mason)\nCapsulate(mason, grayce)\nforall x (Flint(x) and Capsulate(x, mason) -> Smear(x, grayce))\nforall x (Smear(x, grayce) and Decoke(x, mason) -> Sevenfold(grayce))\n\nnot Decoke(mason, grayce)\n\nnot Decoke(mason, grayce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The joana is undersexed. The joana is grenadian. The joana is vaccinated. The joana is absolved. The joana enmesh the erich. The joana virilize the erich. The joana crush the erich. The erich is undersexed. The erich is grenadian. The erich is vaccinated. The erich is absolved. The erich crush the joana. If something is grenadian and it crush the erich then it virilize the joana. If something virilize the joana and it enmesh the erich then the joana is ergotropic. The erich is ergotropic.", "logic": "\nUndersexed(joana)\nGrenadian(joana)\nVaccinated(joana)\nAbsolved(joana)\nEnmesh(joana, erich)\nVirilize(joana, erich)\nCrush(joana, erich)\nUndersexed(erich)\nGrenadian(erich)\nVaccinated(erich)\nAbsolved(erich)\nCrush(erich, joana)\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Crush(x, erich) -> Virilize(x, joana))\nforall x (Virilize(x, joana) and Enmesh(x, erich) -> Ergotropic(joana))\n\nErgotropic(erich)\n\nErgotropic(erich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The gillian is slippered. The gillian is corrosive. The gillian is anonymous. The gillian is seventieth. The gillian stake the natalya. The gillian enervate the natalya. The gillian misdate the natalya. The natalya is slippered. The natalya is corrosive. The natalya is anonymous. The natalya is seventieth. The natalya misdate the gillian. If something is corrosive and it misdate the natalya then it enervate the gillian. If something enervate the gillian and it stake the natalya then the gillian is catatonic. The natalya does not visit the natalya.", "logic": "\nSlippered(gillian)\nCorrosive(gillian)\nAnonymous(gillian)\nSeventieth(gillian)\nStake(gillian, natalya)\nEnervate(gillian, natalya)\nMisdate(gillian, natalya)\nSlippered(natalya)\nCorrosive(natalya)\nAnonymous(natalya)\nSeventieth(natalya)\nMisdate(natalya, gillian)\nforall x (Corrosive(x) and Misdate(x, natalya) -> Enervate(x, gillian))\nforall x (Enervate(x, gillian) and Stake(x, natalya) -> Catatonic(gillian))\n\nnot Misdate(natalya, natalya)\n\nnot Misdate(natalya, natalya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The cynthie is soporific. The cynthie is overladen. The cynthie is floating. The cynthie is hesitating. The cynthie vein the diego. The cynthie sightsing the diego. The cynthie pollenate the diego. The diego is soporific. The diego is overladen. The diego is floating. The diego is hesitating. The diego pollenate the cynthie. If something is overladen and it pollenate the diego then it sightsing the cynthie. If something sightsing the cynthie and it vein the diego then the cynthie is rawboned. The cynthie pollenate the cynthie.", "logic": "\nSoporific(cynthie)\nOverladen(cynthie)\nFloating(cynthie)\nHesitating(cynthie)\nVein(cynthie, diego)\nSightsing(cynthie, diego)\nPollenate(cynthie, diego)\nSoporific(diego)\nOverladen(diego)\nFloating(diego)\nHesitating(diego)\nPollenate(diego, cynthie)\nforall x (Overladen(x) and Pollenate(x, diego) -> Sightsing(x, cynthie))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, cynthie) and Vein(x, diego) -> Rawboned(cynthie))\n\nPollenate(cynthie, cynthie)\n\nPollenate(cynthie, cynthie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1044"} {"premises": "The magnus does not eat the cecil. The magnus cartwheel the cecil. The cecil squeal the magnus. The cecil tamp the magnus. The cecil is not unhearing. The cecil is assisted. The cecil cartwheel the magnus. If something squeal the cecil then it is depressing. All quotidian things are not depressing. If something tamp the cecil and it is unhearing then it is not glinting. If the magnus squeal the cecil and the cecil does not eat the magnus then the cecil is depressing. If the cecil tamp the magnus then the magnus squeal the cecil. If something is depressing then it is assisted. The cecil is assisted.", "logic": "\nnot Tamp(magnus, cecil)\nCartwheel(magnus, cecil)\nSqueal(cecil, magnus)\nTamp(cecil, magnus)\nnot Unhearing(cecil)\nAssisted(cecil)\nCartwheel(cecil, magnus)\nforall x (Squeal(x, cecil) -> Depressing(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> not Depressing(x))\nforall x (Tamp(x, cecil) and Unhearing(x) -> not Glinting(x))\nSqueal(magnus, cecil) and not Tamp(cecil, magnus) -> Depressing(cecil)\nTamp(cecil, magnus) -> Squeal(magnus, cecil)\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Assisted(x))\n\nAssisted(cecil)\n\ntherefore Assisted(cecil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The alastair does not eat the sloane. The alastair devote the sloane. The sloane earth the alastair. The sloane compromise the alastair. The sloane is not destined. The sloane is adamant. The sloane devote the alastair. If something earth the sloane then it is skinless. All regenerate things are not skinless. If something compromise the sloane and it is destined then it is not feeble. If the alastair earth the sloane and the sloane does not eat the alastair then the sloane is skinless. If the sloane compromise the alastair then the alastair earth the sloane. If something is skinless then it is adamant. The sloane is destined.", "logic": "\nnot Compromise(alastair, sloane)\nDevote(alastair, sloane)\nEarth(sloane, alastair)\nCompromise(sloane, alastair)\nnot Destined(sloane)\nAdamant(sloane)\nDevote(sloane, alastair)\nforall x (Earth(x, sloane) -> Skinless(x))\nforall x (Regenerate(x) -> not Skinless(x))\nforall x (Compromise(x, sloane) and Destined(x) -> not Feeble(x))\nEarth(alastair, sloane) and not Compromise(sloane, alastair) -> Skinless(sloane)\nCompromise(sloane, alastair) -> Earth(alastair, sloane)\nforall x (Skinless(x) -> Adamant(x))\n\nDestined(sloane)\n\ntherefore not Destined(sloane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The adella does not eat the lorelle. The adella gabble the lorelle. The lorelle outscore the adella. The lorelle decollate the adella. The lorelle is not pursuing. The lorelle is flush. The lorelle gabble the adella. If something outscore the lorelle then it is autoerotic. All bedded things are not autoerotic. If something decollate the lorelle and it is pursuing then it is not boney. If the adella outscore the lorelle and the lorelle does not eat the adella then the lorelle is autoerotic. If the lorelle decollate the adella then the adella outscore the lorelle. If something is autoerotic then it is flush. The adella outscore the lorelle.", "logic": "\nnot Decollate(adella, lorelle)\nGabble(adella, lorelle)\nOutscore(lorelle, adella)\nDecollate(lorelle, adella)\nnot Pursuing(lorelle)\nFlush(lorelle)\nGabble(lorelle, adella)\nforall x (Outscore(x, lorelle) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Bedded(x) -> not Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Decollate(x, lorelle) and Pursuing(x) -> not Boney(x))\nOutscore(adella, lorelle) and not Decollate(lorelle, adella) -> Autoerotic(lorelle)\nDecollate(lorelle, adella) -> Outscore(adella, lorelle)\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Flush(x))\n\nOutscore(adella, lorelle)\n\nDecollate(lorelle, adella) and Decollate(lorelle, adella) -> Outscore(adella, lorelle) -> therefore Outscore(adella, lorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The millicent does not eat the ingaberg. The millicent embrace the ingaberg. The ingaberg general the millicent. The ingaberg detain the millicent. The ingaberg is not speckless. The ingaberg is safe. The ingaberg embrace the millicent. If something general the ingaberg then it is brahminic. All impalpable things are not brahminic. If something detain the ingaberg and it is speckless then it is not rancorous. If the millicent general the ingaberg and the ingaberg does not eat the millicent then the ingaberg is brahminic. If the ingaberg detain the millicent then the millicent general the ingaberg. If something is brahminic then it is safe. The millicent does not chase the ingaberg.", "logic": "\nnot Detain(millicent, ingaberg)\nEmbrace(millicent, ingaberg)\nGeneral(ingaberg, millicent)\nDetain(ingaberg, millicent)\nnot Speckless(ingaberg)\nSafe(ingaberg)\nEmbrace(ingaberg, millicent)\nforall x (General(x, ingaberg) -> Brahminic(x))\nforall x (Impalpable(x) -> not Brahminic(x))\nforall x (Detain(x, ingaberg) and Speckless(x) -> not Rancorous(x))\nGeneral(millicent, ingaberg) and not Detain(ingaberg, millicent) -> Brahminic(ingaberg)\nDetain(ingaberg, millicent) -> General(millicent, ingaberg)\nforall x (Brahminic(x) -> Safe(x))\n\nnot General(millicent, ingaberg)\n\nDetain(ingaberg, millicent) and Detain(ingaberg, millicent) -> General(millicent, ingaberg) -> therefore General(millicent, ingaberg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The nat does not eat the rosaline. The nat shamanise the rosaline. The rosaline airbrush the nat. The rosaline flirt the nat. The rosaline is not mettlesome. The rosaline is eternal. The rosaline shamanise the nat. If something airbrush the rosaline then it is nethermost. All treed things are not nethermost. If something flirt the rosaline and it is mettlesome then it is not saleable. If the nat airbrush the rosaline and the rosaline does not eat the nat then the rosaline is nethermost. If the rosaline flirt the nat then the nat airbrush the rosaline. If something is nethermost then it is eternal. The nat is nethermost.", "logic": "\nnot Flirt(nat, rosaline)\nShamanise(nat, rosaline)\nAirbrush(rosaline, nat)\nFlirt(rosaline, nat)\nnot Mettlesome(rosaline)\nEternal(rosaline)\nShamanise(rosaline, nat)\nforall x (Airbrush(x, rosaline) -> Nethermost(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> not Nethermost(x))\nforall x (Flirt(x, rosaline) and Mettlesome(x) -> not Saleable(x))\nAirbrush(nat, rosaline) and not Flirt(rosaline, nat) -> Nethermost(rosaline)\nFlirt(rosaline, nat) -> Airbrush(nat, rosaline)\nforall x (Nethermost(x) -> Eternal(x))\n\nNethermost(nat)\n\nFlirt(rosaline, nat) and Flirt(rosaline, nat) -> Airbrush(nat, rosaline) -> therefore Airbrush(nat, rosaline) Airbrush(nat, rosaline) and forall x (Airbrush(x, rosaline) -> Nethermost(x)) -> therefore Nethermost(nat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The rodolph does not eat the sisile. The rodolph image the sisile. The sisile torture the rodolph. The sisile snag the rodolph. The sisile is not dalmatian. The sisile is attacking. The sisile image the rodolph. If something torture the sisile then it is rococo. All sumerian things are not rococo. If something snag the sisile and it is dalmatian then it is not crural. If the rodolph torture the sisile and the sisile does not eat the rodolph then the sisile is rococo. If the sisile snag the rodolph then the rodolph torture the sisile. If something is rococo then it is attacking. The rodolph is not rococo.", "logic": "\nnot Snag(rodolph, sisile)\nImage(rodolph, sisile)\nTorture(sisile, rodolph)\nSnag(sisile, rodolph)\nnot Dalmatian(sisile)\nAttacking(sisile)\nImage(sisile, rodolph)\nforall x (Torture(x, sisile) -> Rococo(x))\nforall x (Sumerian(x) -> not Rococo(x))\nforall x (Snag(x, sisile) and Dalmatian(x) -> not Crural(x))\nTorture(rodolph, sisile) and not Snag(sisile, rodolph) -> Rococo(sisile)\nSnag(sisile, rodolph) -> Torture(rodolph, sisile)\nforall x (Rococo(x) -> Attacking(x))\n\nnot Rococo(rodolph)\n\nSnag(sisile, rodolph) and Snag(sisile, rodolph) -> Torture(rodolph, sisile) -> therefore Torture(rodolph, sisile) Torture(rodolph, sisile) and forall x (Torture(x, sisile) -> Rococo(x)) -> therefore Rococo(rodolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The rem does not eat the stanton. The rem despatch the stanton. The stanton vault the rem. The stanton overplay the rem. The stanton is not henpecked. The stanton is ascetic. The stanton despatch the rem. If something vault the stanton then it is recluse. All written things are not recluse. If something overplay the stanton and it is henpecked then it is not fourth. If the rem vault the stanton and the stanton does not eat the rem then the stanton is recluse. If the stanton overplay the rem then the rem vault the stanton. If something is recluse then it is ascetic. The stanton is not recluse.", "logic": "\nnot Overplay(rem, stanton)\nDespatch(rem, stanton)\nVault(stanton, rem)\nOverplay(stanton, rem)\nnot Henpecked(stanton)\nAscetic(stanton)\nDespatch(stanton, rem)\nforall x (Vault(x, stanton) -> Recluse(x))\nforall x (Written(x) -> not Recluse(x))\nforall x (Overplay(x, stanton) and Henpecked(x) -> not Fourth(x))\nVault(rem, stanton) and not Overplay(stanton, rem) -> Recluse(stanton)\nOverplay(stanton, rem) -> Vault(rem, stanton)\nforall x (Recluse(x) -> Ascetic(x))\n\nnot Recluse(stanton)\n\nforall x (Vault(x, stanton) -> Recluse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The mitchell does not eat the artie. The mitchell pillow the artie. The artie knight the mitchell. The artie deserve the mitchell. The artie is not dwarfish. The artie is knockdown. The artie pillow the mitchell. If something knight the artie then it is epizoic. All dioestrual things are not epizoic. If something deserve the artie and it is dwarfish then it is not frisky. If the mitchell knight the artie and the artie does not eat the mitchell then the artie is epizoic. If the artie deserve the mitchell then the mitchell knight the artie. If something is epizoic then it is knockdown. The mitchell is frisky.", "logic": "\nnot Deserve(mitchell, artie)\nPillow(mitchell, artie)\nKnight(artie, mitchell)\nDeserve(artie, mitchell)\nnot Dwarfish(artie)\nKnockdown(artie)\nPillow(artie, mitchell)\nforall x (Knight(x, artie) -> Epizoic(x))\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) -> not Epizoic(x))\nforall x (Deserve(x, artie) and Dwarfish(x) -> not Frisky(x))\nKnight(mitchell, artie) and not Deserve(artie, mitchell) -> Epizoic(artie)\nDeserve(artie, mitchell) -> Knight(mitchell, artie)\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Knockdown(x))\n\nFrisky(mitchell)\n\nFrisky(mitchell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The kaspar does not eat the corny. The kaspar sodomize the corny. The corny nictate the kaspar. The corny draught the kaspar. The corny is not darkening. The corny is archducal. The corny sodomize the kaspar. If something nictate the corny then it is centigrade. All nominated things are not centigrade. If something draught the corny and it is darkening then it is not gainful. If the kaspar nictate the corny and the corny does not eat the kaspar then the corny is centigrade. If the corny draught the kaspar then the kaspar nictate the corny. If something is centigrade then it is archducal. The kaspar does not eat the kaspar.", "logic": "\nnot Draught(kaspar, corny)\nSodomize(kaspar, corny)\nNictate(corny, kaspar)\nDraught(corny, kaspar)\nnot Darkening(corny)\nArchducal(corny)\nSodomize(corny, kaspar)\nforall x (Nictate(x, corny) -> Centigrade(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> not Centigrade(x))\nforall x (Draught(x, corny) and Darkening(x) -> not Gainful(x))\nNictate(kaspar, corny) and not Draught(corny, kaspar) -> Centigrade(corny)\nDraught(corny, kaspar) -> Nictate(kaspar, corny)\nforall x (Centigrade(x) -> Archducal(x))\n\nnot Draught(kaspar, kaspar)\n\nnot Draught(kaspar, kaspar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The brietta does not eat the thayne. The brietta affront the thayne. The thayne garb the brietta. The thayne goffer the brietta. The thayne is not duplex. The thayne is strategic. The thayne affront the brietta. If something garb the thayne then it is laminar. All indian things are not laminar. If something goffer the thayne and it is duplex then it is not subdued. If the brietta garb the thayne and the thayne does not eat the brietta then the thayne is laminar. If the thayne goffer the brietta then the brietta garb the thayne. If something is laminar then it is strategic. The thayne goffer the thayne.", "logic": "\nnot Goffer(brietta, thayne)\nAffront(brietta, thayne)\nGarb(thayne, brietta)\nGoffer(thayne, brietta)\nnot Duplex(thayne)\nStrategic(thayne)\nAffront(thayne, brietta)\nforall x (Garb(x, thayne) -> Laminar(x))\nforall x (Indian(x) -> not Laminar(x))\nforall x (Goffer(x, thayne) and Duplex(x) -> not Subdued(x))\nGarb(brietta, thayne) and not Goffer(thayne, brietta) -> Laminar(thayne)\nGoffer(thayne, brietta) -> Garb(brietta, thayne)\nforall x (Laminar(x) -> Strategic(x))\n\nGoffer(thayne, thayne)\n\nGoffer(thayne, thayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The sheree does not eat the aphrodite. The sheree feud the aphrodite. The aphrodite approve the sheree. The aphrodite domicile the sheree. The aphrodite is not bigeminal. The aphrodite is shot. The aphrodite feud the sheree. If something approve the aphrodite then it is ototoxic. All turbaned things are not ototoxic. If something domicile the aphrodite and it is bigeminal then it is not fascistic. If the sheree approve the aphrodite and the aphrodite does not eat the sheree then the aphrodite is ototoxic. If the aphrodite domicile the sheree then the sheree approve the aphrodite. If something is ototoxic then it is shot. The aphrodite is not fascistic.", "logic": "\nnot Domicile(sheree, aphrodite)\nFeud(sheree, aphrodite)\nApprove(aphrodite, sheree)\nDomicile(aphrodite, sheree)\nnot Bigeminal(aphrodite)\nShot(aphrodite)\nFeud(aphrodite, sheree)\nforall x (Approve(x, aphrodite) -> Ototoxic(x))\nforall x (Turbaned(x) -> not Ototoxic(x))\nforall x (Domicile(x, aphrodite) and Bigeminal(x) -> not Fascistic(x))\nApprove(sheree, aphrodite) and not Domicile(aphrodite, sheree) -> Ototoxic(aphrodite)\nDomicile(aphrodite, sheree) -> Approve(sheree, aphrodite)\nforall x (Ototoxic(x) -> Shot(x))\n\nnot Fascistic(aphrodite)\n\nnot Fascistic(aphrodite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The emelita does not eat the roberta. The emelita bestrew the roberta. The roberta corrode the emelita. The roberta accrete the emelita. The roberta is not unfaceted. The roberta is owing. The roberta bestrew the emelita. If something corrode the roberta then it is outgoing. All accursed things are not outgoing. If something accrete the roberta and it is unfaceted then it is not rivalrous. If the emelita corrode the roberta and the roberta does not eat the emelita then the roberta is outgoing. If the roberta accrete the emelita then the emelita corrode the roberta. If something is outgoing then it is owing. The roberta corrode the roberta.", "logic": "\nnot Accrete(emelita, roberta)\nBestrew(emelita, roberta)\nCorrode(roberta, emelita)\nAccrete(roberta, emelita)\nnot Unfaceted(roberta)\nOwing(roberta)\nBestrew(roberta, emelita)\nforall x (Corrode(x, roberta) -> Outgoing(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> not Outgoing(x))\nforall x (Accrete(x, roberta) and Unfaceted(x) -> not Rivalrous(x))\nCorrode(emelita, roberta) and not Accrete(roberta, emelita) -> Outgoing(roberta)\nAccrete(roberta, emelita) -> Corrode(emelita, roberta)\nforall x (Outgoing(x) -> Owing(x))\n\nCorrode(roberta, roberta)\n\nCorrode(roberta, roberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-182"} {"premises": "The yacov interlace the milly. The yacov interlace the melodie. The milly lateralize the melodie. The milly lateralize the judd. The milly is awing. The milly is righteous. The milly recline the judd. The melodie recline the yacov. The melodie interlace the milly. The judd lateralize the milly. The judd is awing. The judd is innocuous. The judd recline the yacov. The judd recline the melodie. The judd interlace the milly. The judd interlace the melodie. All awing people are innocuous. If someone lateralize the milly and the milly is righteous then they are righteous. If someone recline the yacov and they are righteous then the yacov is innocuous. If someone is unmanlike then they eat the melodie. If the judd is awing then the judd is righteous. If someone interlace the yacov then the yacov is unmanlike. The milly recline the judd.", "logic": "\nInterlace(yacov, milly)\nInterlace(yacov, melodie)\nLateralize(milly, melodie)\nLateralize(milly, judd)\nAwing(milly)\nRighteous(milly)\nRecline(milly, judd)\nRecline(melodie, yacov)\nInterlace(melodie, milly)\nLateralize(judd, milly)\nAwing(judd)\nInnocuous(judd)\nRecline(judd, yacov)\nRecline(judd, melodie)\nInterlace(judd, milly)\nInterlace(judd, melodie)\nforall x (Awing(x) -> Innocuous(x))\nforall x (Lateralize(x, milly) and Righteous(milly) -> Righteous(x))\nforall x (Recline(x, yacov) and Righteous(x) -> Innocuous(yacov))\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) -> Lateralize(x, melodie))\nAwing(judd) -> Righteous(judd)\nforall x (Interlace(x, yacov) -> Unmanlike(yacov))\n\nRecline(milly, judd)\n\ntherefore Recline(milly, judd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The shela trifle the nicolette. The shela trifle the corky. The nicolette exist the corky. The nicolette exist the yale. The nicolette is noncurrent. The nicolette is catalytic. The nicolette jostle the yale. The corky jostle the shela. The corky trifle the nicolette. The yale exist the nicolette. The yale is noncurrent. The yale is liable. The yale jostle the shela. The yale jostle the corky. The yale trifle the nicolette. The yale trifle the corky. All noncurrent people are liable. If someone exist the nicolette and the nicolette is catalytic then they are catalytic. If someone jostle the shela and they are catalytic then the shela is liable. If someone is roiling then they eat the corky. If the yale is noncurrent then the yale is catalytic. If someone trifle the shela then the shela is roiling. The yale does not visit the corky.", "logic": "\nTrifle(shela, nicolette)\nTrifle(shela, corky)\nExist(nicolette, corky)\nExist(nicolette, yale)\nNoncurrent(nicolette)\nCatalytic(nicolette)\nJostle(nicolette, yale)\nJostle(corky, shela)\nTrifle(corky, nicolette)\nExist(yale, nicolette)\nNoncurrent(yale)\nLiable(yale)\nJostle(yale, shela)\nJostle(yale, corky)\nTrifle(yale, nicolette)\nTrifle(yale, corky)\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Exist(x, nicolette) and Catalytic(nicolette) -> Catalytic(x))\nforall x (Jostle(x, shela) and Catalytic(x) -> Liable(shela))\nforall x (Roiling(x) -> Exist(x, corky))\nNoncurrent(yale) -> Catalytic(yale)\nforall x (Trifle(x, shela) -> Roiling(shela))\n\nnot Trifle(yale, corky)\n\ntherefore Trifle(yale, corky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The nanine yank the sadie. The nanine yank the teane. The sadie chouse the teane. The sadie chouse the adnan. The sadie is revenant. The sadie is half. The sadie fizz the adnan. The teane fizz the nanine. The teane yank the sadie. The adnan chouse the sadie. The adnan is revenant. The adnan is blanketed. The adnan fizz the nanine. The adnan fizz the teane. The adnan yank the sadie. The adnan yank the teane. All revenant people are blanketed. If someone chouse the sadie and the sadie is half then they are half. If someone fizz the nanine and they are half then the nanine is blanketed. If someone is repugnant then they eat the teane. If the adnan is revenant then the adnan is half. If someone yank the nanine then the nanine is repugnant. The adnan is half.", "logic": "\nYank(nanine, sadie)\nYank(nanine, teane)\nChouse(sadie, teane)\nChouse(sadie, adnan)\nRevenant(sadie)\nHalf(sadie)\nFizz(sadie, adnan)\nFizz(teane, nanine)\nYank(teane, sadie)\nChouse(adnan, sadie)\nRevenant(adnan)\nBlanketed(adnan)\nFizz(adnan, nanine)\nFizz(adnan, teane)\nYank(adnan, sadie)\nYank(adnan, teane)\nforall x (Revenant(x) -> Blanketed(x))\nforall x (Chouse(x, sadie) and Half(sadie) -> Half(x))\nforall x (Fizz(x, nanine) and Half(x) -> Blanketed(nanine))\nforall x (Repugnant(x) -> Chouse(x, teane))\nRevenant(adnan) -> Half(adnan)\nforall x (Yank(x, nanine) -> Repugnant(nanine))\n\nHalf(adnan)\n\nRevenant(adnan) and Revenant(adnan) -> Half(adnan) -> therefore Half(adnan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The langston spotlight the marlo. The langston spotlight the atlanta. The marlo penalize the atlanta. The marlo penalize the cristin. The marlo is boss. The marlo is vociferous. The marlo relocate the cristin. The atlanta relocate the langston. The atlanta spotlight the marlo. The cristin penalize the marlo. The cristin is boss. The cristin is unfocussed. The cristin relocate the langston. The cristin relocate the atlanta. The cristin spotlight the marlo. The cristin spotlight the atlanta. All boss people are unfocussed. If someone penalize the marlo and the marlo is vociferous then they are vociferous. If someone relocate the langston and they are vociferous then the langston is unfocussed. If someone is canonic then they eat the atlanta. If the cristin is boss then the cristin is vociferous. If someone spotlight the langston then the langston is canonic. The cristin is not vociferous.", "logic": "\nSpotlight(langston, marlo)\nSpotlight(langston, atlanta)\nPenalize(marlo, atlanta)\nPenalize(marlo, cristin)\nBoss(marlo)\nVociferous(marlo)\nRelocate(marlo, cristin)\nRelocate(atlanta, langston)\nSpotlight(atlanta, marlo)\nPenalize(cristin, marlo)\nBoss(cristin)\nUnfocussed(cristin)\nRelocate(cristin, langston)\nRelocate(cristin, atlanta)\nSpotlight(cristin, marlo)\nSpotlight(cristin, atlanta)\nforall x (Boss(x) -> Unfocussed(x))\nforall x (Penalize(x, marlo) and Vociferous(marlo) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Relocate(x, langston) and Vociferous(x) -> Unfocussed(langston))\nforall x (Canonic(x) -> Penalize(x, atlanta))\nBoss(cristin) -> Vociferous(cristin)\nforall x (Spotlight(x, langston) -> Canonic(langston))\n\nnot Vociferous(cristin)\n\nBoss(cristin) and Boss(cristin) -> Vociferous(cristin) -> therefore Vociferous(cristin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The bealle heckle the tomkin. The bealle heckle the emmit. The tomkin broil the emmit. The tomkin broil the bess. The tomkin is affective. The tomkin is delphian. The tomkin premiss the bess. The emmit premiss the bealle. The emmit heckle the tomkin. The bess broil the tomkin. The bess is affective. The bess is adagio. The bess premiss the bealle. The bess premiss the emmit. The bess heckle the tomkin. The bess heckle the emmit. All affective people are adagio. If someone broil the tomkin and the tomkin is delphian then they are delphian. If someone premiss the bealle and they are delphian then the bealle is adagio. If someone is catacorner then they eat the emmit. If the bess is affective then the bess is delphian. If someone heckle the bealle then the bealle is catacorner. The bealle is adagio.", "logic": "\nHeckle(bealle, tomkin)\nHeckle(bealle, emmit)\nBroil(tomkin, emmit)\nBroil(tomkin, bess)\nAffective(tomkin)\nDelphian(tomkin)\nPremiss(tomkin, bess)\nPremiss(emmit, bealle)\nHeckle(emmit, tomkin)\nBroil(bess, tomkin)\nAffective(bess)\nAdagio(bess)\nPremiss(bess, bealle)\nPremiss(bess, emmit)\nHeckle(bess, tomkin)\nHeckle(bess, emmit)\nforall x (Affective(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Broil(x, tomkin) and Delphian(tomkin) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Premiss(x, bealle) and Delphian(x) -> Adagio(bealle))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) -> Broil(x, emmit))\nAffective(bess) -> Delphian(bess)\nforall x (Heckle(x, bealle) -> Catacorner(bealle))\n\nAdagio(bealle)\n\nAffective(bess) and Affective(bess) -> Delphian(bess) -> therefore Delphian(bess) Premiss(bess, bealle) and Delphian(bess) and forall x (Premiss(x, bealle) and Delphian(x) -> Adagio(bealle)) -> therefore Adagio(bealle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The kia crust the corilla. The kia crust the molli. The corilla begrime the molli. The corilla begrime the bertine. The corilla is invasive. The corilla is cyclic. The corilla preordain the bertine. The molli preordain the kia. The molli crust the corilla. The bertine begrime the corilla. The bertine is invasive. The bertine is spacy. The bertine preordain the kia. The bertine preordain the molli. The bertine crust the corilla. The bertine crust the molli. All invasive people are spacy. If someone begrime the corilla and the corilla is cyclic then they are cyclic. If someone preordain the kia and they are cyclic then the kia is spacy. If someone is mantled then they eat the molli. If the bertine is invasive then the bertine is cyclic. If someone crust the kia then the kia is mantled. The kia is not spacy.", "logic": "\nCrust(kia, corilla)\nCrust(kia, molli)\nBegrime(corilla, molli)\nBegrime(corilla, bertine)\nInvasive(corilla)\nCyclic(corilla)\nPreordain(corilla, bertine)\nPreordain(molli, kia)\nCrust(molli, corilla)\nBegrime(bertine, corilla)\nInvasive(bertine)\nSpacy(bertine)\nPreordain(bertine, kia)\nPreordain(bertine, molli)\nCrust(bertine, corilla)\nCrust(bertine, molli)\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Spacy(x))\nforall x (Begrime(x, corilla) and Cyclic(corilla) -> Cyclic(x))\nforall x (Preordain(x, kia) and Cyclic(x) -> Spacy(kia))\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Begrime(x, molli))\nInvasive(bertine) -> Cyclic(bertine)\nforall x (Crust(x, kia) -> Mantled(kia))\n\nnot Spacy(kia)\n\nInvasive(bertine) and Invasive(bertine) -> Cyclic(bertine) -> therefore Cyclic(bertine) Preordain(bertine, kia) and Cyclic(bertine) and forall x (Preordain(x, kia) and Cyclic(x) -> Spacy(kia)) -> therefore Spacy(kia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The geneva protract the melodie. The geneva protract the halie. The melodie slush the halie. The melodie slush the aylmer. The melodie is fattish. The melodie is unawed. The melodie table the aylmer. The halie table the geneva. The halie protract the melodie. The aylmer slush the melodie. The aylmer is fattish. The aylmer is oblivious. The aylmer table the geneva. The aylmer table the halie. The aylmer protract the melodie. The aylmer protract the halie. All fattish people are oblivious. If someone slush the melodie and the melodie is unawed then they are unawed. If someone table the geneva and they are unawed then the geneva is oblivious. If someone is relevant then they eat the halie. If the aylmer is fattish then the aylmer is unawed. If someone protract the geneva then the geneva is relevant. The geneva is not unawed.", "logic": "\nProtract(geneva, melodie)\nProtract(geneva, halie)\nSlush(melodie, halie)\nSlush(melodie, aylmer)\nFattish(melodie)\nUnawed(melodie)\nTable(melodie, aylmer)\nTable(halie, geneva)\nProtract(halie, melodie)\nSlush(aylmer, melodie)\nFattish(aylmer)\nOblivious(aylmer)\nTable(aylmer, geneva)\nTable(aylmer, halie)\nProtract(aylmer, melodie)\nProtract(aylmer, halie)\nforall x (Fattish(x) -> Oblivious(x))\nforall x (Slush(x, melodie) and Unawed(melodie) -> Unawed(x))\nforall x (Table(x, geneva) and Unawed(x) -> Oblivious(geneva))\nforall x (Relevant(x) -> Slush(x, halie))\nFattish(aylmer) -> Unawed(aylmer)\nforall x (Protract(x, geneva) -> Relevant(geneva))\n\nnot Unawed(geneva)\n\nforall x (Slush(x, melodie) and Unawed(melodie) -> Unawed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The antone perform the austen. The antone perform the abbe. The austen acetylize the abbe. The austen acetylize the homer. The austen is lxxiii. The austen is mousey. The austen dispute the homer. The abbe dispute the antone. The abbe perform the austen. The homer acetylize the austen. The homer is lxxiii. The homer is boggy. The homer dispute the antone. The homer dispute the abbe. The homer perform the austen. The homer perform the abbe. All lxxiii people are boggy. If someone acetylize the austen and the austen is mousey then they are mousey. If someone dispute the antone and they are mousey then the antone is boggy. If someone is avascular then they eat the abbe. If the homer is lxxiii then the homer is mousey. If someone perform the antone then the antone is avascular. The homer acetylize the abbe.", "logic": "\nPerform(antone, austen)\nPerform(antone, abbe)\nAcetylize(austen, abbe)\nAcetylize(austen, homer)\nLxxiii(austen)\nMousey(austen)\nDispute(austen, homer)\nDispute(abbe, antone)\nPerform(abbe, austen)\nAcetylize(homer, austen)\nLxxiii(homer)\nBoggy(homer)\nDispute(homer, antone)\nDispute(homer, abbe)\nPerform(homer, austen)\nPerform(homer, abbe)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Acetylize(x, austen) and Mousey(austen) -> Mousey(x))\nforall x (Dispute(x, antone) and Mousey(x) -> Boggy(antone))\nforall x (Avascular(x) -> Acetylize(x, abbe))\nLxxiii(homer) -> Mousey(homer)\nforall x (Perform(x, antone) -> Avascular(antone))\n\nAcetylize(homer, abbe)\n\nforall x (Avascular(x) -> Acetylize(x, abbe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The finley steep the temple. The finley steep the damaris. The temple deprave the damaris. The temple deprave the sholom. The temple is asiatic. The temple is roomy. The temple frog the sholom. The damaris frog the finley. The damaris steep the temple. The sholom deprave the temple. The sholom is asiatic. The sholom is nautical. The sholom frog the finley. The sholom frog the damaris. The sholom steep the temple. The sholom steep the damaris. All asiatic people are nautical. If someone deprave the temple and the temple is roomy then they are roomy. If someone frog the finley and they are roomy then the finley is nautical. If someone is breathing then they eat the damaris. If the sholom is asiatic then the sholom is roomy. If someone steep the finley then the finley is breathing. The damaris does not eat the damaris.", "logic": "\nSteep(finley, temple)\nSteep(finley, damaris)\nDeprave(temple, damaris)\nDeprave(temple, sholom)\nAsiatic(temple)\nRoomy(temple)\nFrog(temple, sholom)\nFrog(damaris, finley)\nSteep(damaris, temple)\nDeprave(sholom, temple)\nAsiatic(sholom)\nNautical(sholom)\nFrog(sholom, finley)\nFrog(sholom, damaris)\nSteep(sholom, temple)\nSteep(sholom, damaris)\nforall x (Asiatic(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Deprave(x, temple) and Roomy(temple) -> Roomy(x))\nforall x (Frog(x, finley) and Roomy(x) -> Nautical(finley))\nforall x (Breathing(x) -> Deprave(x, damaris))\nAsiatic(sholom) -> Roomy(sholom)\nforall x (Steep(x, finley) -> Breathing(finley))\n\nnot Deprave(damaris, damaris)\n\nforall x (Breathing(x) -> Deprave(x, damaris)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The alvina affront the tamarra. The alvina affront the shurlock. The tamarra blabber the shurlock. The tamarra blabber the garnette. The tamarra is paralyzed. The tamarra is hazel. The tamarra unitise the garnette. The shurlock unitise the alvina. The shurlock affront the tamarra. The garnette blabber the tamarra. The garnette is paralyzed. The garnette is meridional. The garnette unitise the alvina. The garnette unitise the shurlock. The garnette affront the tamarra. The garnette affront the shurlock. All paralyzed people are meridional. If someone blabber the tamarra and the tamarra is hazel then they are hazel. If someone unitise the alvina and they are hazel then the alvina is meridional. If someone is treasured then they eat the shurlock. If the garnette is paralyzed then the garnette is hazel. If someone affront the alvina then the alvina is treasured. The shurlock affront the garnette.", "logic": "\nAffront(alvina, tamarra)\nAffront(alvina, shurlock)\nBlabber(tamarra, shurlock)\nBlabber(tamarra, garnette)\nParalyzed(tamarra)\nHazel(tamarra)\nUnitise(tamarra, garnette)\nUnitise(shurlock, alvina)\nAffront(shurlock, tamarra)\nBlabber(garnette, tamarra)\nParalyzed(garnette)\nMeridional(garnette)\nUnitise(garnette, alvina)\nUnitise(garnette, shurlock)\nAffront(garnette, tamarra)\nAffront(garnette, shurlock)\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> Meridional(x))\nforall x (Blabber(x, tamarra) and Hazel(tamarra) -> Hazel(x))\nforall x (Unitise(x, alvina) and Hazel(x) -> Meridional(alvina))\nforall x (Treasured(x) -> Blabber(x, shurlock))\nParalyzed(garnette) -> Hazel(garnette)\nforall x (Affront(x, alvina) -> Treasured(alvina))\n\nAffront(shurlock, garnette)\n\nAffront(shurlock, garnette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The ardith telefax the kay. The ardith telefax the kalil. The kay nazify the kalil. The kay nazify the tuck. The kay is millennial. The kay is formic. The kay screen the tuck. The kalil screen the ardith. The kalil telefax the kay. The tuck nazify the kay. The tuck is millennial. The tuck is reprobate. The tuck screen the ardith. The tuck screen the kalil. The tuck telefax the kay. The tuck telefax the kalil. All millennial people are reprobate. If someone nazify the kay and the kay is formic then they are formic. If someone screen the ardith and they are formic then the ardith is reprobate. If someone is alto then they eat the kalil. If the tuck is millennial then the tuck is formic. If someone telefax the ardith then the ardith is alto. The ardith does not visit the tuck.", "logic": "\nTelefax(ardith, kay)\nTelefax(ardith, kalil)\nNazify(kay, kalil)\nNazify(kay, tuck)\nMillennial(kay)\nFormic(kay)\nScreen(kay, tuck)\nScreen(kalil, ardith)\nTelefax(kalil, kay)\nNazify(tuck, kay)\nMillennial(tuck)\nReprobate(tuck)\nScreen(tuck, ardith)\nScreen(tuck, kalil)\nTelefax(tuck, kay)\nTelefax(tuck, kalil)\nforall x (Millennial(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Nazify(x, kay) and Formic(kay) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Screen(x, ardith) and Formic(x) -> Reprobate(ardith))\nforall x (Alto(x) -> Nazify(x, kalil))\nMillennial(tuck) -> Formic(tuck)\nforall x (Telefax(x, ardith) -> Alto(ardith))\n\nnot Telefax(ardith, tuck)\n\nnot Telefax(ardith, tuck) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The dunc slime the wright. The dunc slime the mitchell. The wright uniformise the mitchell. The wright uniformise the beatrice. The wright is contagious. The wright is whitish. The wright scrimmage the beatrice. The mitchell scrimmage the dunc. The mitchell slime the wright. The beatrice uniformise the wright. The beatrice is contagious. The beatrice is unmated. The beatrice scrimmage the dunc. The beatrice scrimmage the mitchell. The beatrice slime the wright. The beatrice slime the mitchell. All contagious people are unmated. If someone uniformise the wright and the wright is whitish then they are whitish. If someone scrimmage the dunc and they are whitish then the dunc is unmated. If someone is spangled then they eat the mitchell. If the beatrice is contagious then the beatrice is whitish. If someone slime the dunc then the dunc is spangled. The dunc is green.", "logic": "\nSlime(dunc, wright)\nSlime(dunc, mitchell)\nUniformise(wright, mitchell)\nUniformise(wright, beatrice)\nContagious(wright)\nWhitish(wright)\nScrimmage(wright, beatrice)\nScrimmage(mitchell, dunc)\nSlime(mitchell, wright)\nUniformise(beatrice, wright)\nContagious(beatrice)\nUnmated(beatrice)\nScrimmage(beatrice, dunc)\nScrimmage(beatrice, mitchell)\nSlime(beatrice, wright)\nSlime(beatrice, mitchell)\nforall x (Contagious(x) -> Unmated(x))\nforall x (Uniformise(x, wright) and Whitish(wright) -> Whitish(x))\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, dunc) and Whitish(x) -> Unmated(dunc))\nforall x (Spangled(x) -> Uniformise(x, mitchell))\nContagious(beatrice) -> Whitish(beatrice)\nforall x (Slime(x, dunc) -> Spangled(dunc))\n\nGreen(dunc)\n\nGreen(dunc) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-608"} {"premises": "The dara pander the catriona. The dara pander the ellissa. The andres is raiseable. The andres pander the dara. The andres cushion the catriona. The andres impress the dara. The andres impress the catriona. The catriona pander the andres. The catriona pander the ellissa. The catriona impress the ellissa. The ellissa is raiseable. The ellissa cushion the andres. If someone is roan then they see the dara. If the catriona cushion the dara then the catriona impress the dara. If someone pander the andres then they are wheelless. If someone is wheelless and they visit the ellissa then they see the dara. If someone impress the andres then they are changeful. If someone impress the dara then they are raiseable. The andres impress the catriona.", "logic": "\nPander(dara, catriona)\nPander(dara, ellissa)\nRaiseable(andres)\nPander(andres, dara)\nCushion(andres, catriona)\nImpress(andres, dara)\nImpress(andres, catriona)\nPander(catriona, andres)\nPander(catriona, ellissa)\nImpress(catriona, ellissa)\nRaiseable(ellissa)\nCushion(ellissa, andres)\nforall x (Roan(x) -> Cushion(x, dara))\nCushion(catriona, dara) -> Impress(catriona, dara)\nforall x (Pander(x, andres) -> Wheelless(x))\nforall x (Wheelless(x) and Impress(x, ellissa) -> Cushion(x, dara))\nforall x (Impress(x, andres) -> Changeful(x))\nforall x (Impress(x, dara) -> Raiseable(x))\n\nImpress(andres, catriona)\n\ntherefore Impress(andres, catriona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The jefferson prey the carlee. The jefferson prey the loraine. The engelbert is billion. The engelbert prey the jefferson. The engelbert hightail the carlee. The engelbert convulse the jefferson. The engelbert convulse the carlee. The carlee prey the engelbert. The carlee prey the loraine. The carlee convulse the loraine. The loraine is billion. The loraine hightail the engelbert. If someone is saxon then they see the jefferson. If the carlee hightail the jefferson then the carlee convulse the jefferson. If someone prey the engelbert then they are cumuliform. If someone is cumuliform and they visit the loraine then they see the jefferson. If someone convulse the engelbert then they are weakened. If someone convulse the jefferson then they are billion. The engelbert does not visit the jefferson.", "logic": "\nPrey(jefferson, carlee)\nPrey(jefferson, loraine)\nBillion(engelbert)\nPrey(engelbert, jefferson)\nHightail(engelbert, carlee)\nConvulse(engelbert, jefferson)\nConvulse(engelbert, carlee)\nPrey(carlee, engelbert)\nPrey(carlee, loraine)\nConvulse(carlee, loraine)\nBillion(loraine)\nHightail(loraine, engelbert)\nforall x (Saxon(x) -> Hightail(x, jefferson))\nHightail(carlee, jefferson) -> Convulse(carlee, jefferson)\nforall x (Prey(x, engelbert) -> Cumuliform(x))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) and Convulse(x, loraine) -> Hightail(x, jefferson))\nforall x (Convulse(x, engelbert) -> Weakened(x))\nforall x (Convulse(x, jefferson) -> Billion(x))\n\nnot Convulse(engelbert, jefferson)\n\ntherefore Convulse(engelbert, jefferson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The ingrid hint the erwin. The ingrid hint the sterne. The heather is through. The heather hint the ingrid. The heather embrace the erwin. The heather flay the ingrid. The heather flay the erwin. The erwin hint the heather. The erwin hint the sterne. The erwin flay the sterne. The sterne is through. The sterne embrace the heather. If someone is growing then they see the ingrid. If the erwin embrace the ingrid then the erwin flay the ingrid. If someone hint the heather then they are clxxx. If someone is clxxx and they visit the sterne then they see the ingrid. If someone flay the heather then they are demure. If someone flay the ingrid then they are through. The erwin is clxxx.", "logic": "\nHint(ingrid, erwin)\nHint(ingrid, sterne)\nThrough(heather)\nHint(heather, ingrid)\nEmbrace(heather, erwin)\nFlay(heather, ingrid)\nFlay(heather, erwin)\nHint(erwin, heather)\nHint(erwin, sterne)\nFlay(erwin, sterne)\nThrough(sterne)\nEmbrace(sterne, heather)\nforall x (Growing(x) -> Embrace(x, ingrid))\nEmbrace(erwin, ingrid) -> Flay(erwin, ingrid)\nforall x (Hint(x, heather) -> Clxxx(x))\nforall x (Clxxx(x) and Flay(x, sterne) -> Embrace(x, ingrid))\nforall x (Flay(x, heather) -> Demure(x))\nforall x (Flay(x, ingrid) -> Through(x))\n\nClxxx(erwin)\n\nHint(erwin, heather) and forall x (Hint(x, heather) -> Clxxx(x)) -> therefore Clxxx(erwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The anna waive the ronnie. The anna waive the danette. The ema is cosmogenic. The ema waive the anna. The ema delete the ronnie. The ema ream the anna. The ema ream the ronnie. The ronnie waive the ema. The ronnie waive the danette. The ronnie ream the danette. The danette is cosmogenic. The danette delete the ema. If someone is bonnie then they see the anna. If the ronnie delete the anna then the ronnie ream the anna. If someone waive the ema then they are illusory. If someone is illusory and they visit the danette then they see the anna. If someone ream the ema then they are attained. If someone ream the anna then they are cosmogenic. The ronnie is not illusory.", "logic": "\nWaive(anna, ronnie)\nWaive(anna, danette)\nCosmogenic(ema)\nWaive(ema, anna)\nDelete(ema, ronnie)\nReam(ema, anna)\nReam(ema, ronnie)\nWaive(ronnie, ema)\nWaive(ronnie, danette)\nReam(ronnie, danette)\nCosmogenic(danette)\nDelete(danette, ema)\nforall x (Bonnie(x) -> Delete(x, anna))\nDelete(ronnie, anna) -> Ream(ronnie, anna)\nforall x (Waive(x, ema) -> Illusory(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) and Ream(x, danette) -> Delete(x, anna))\nforall x (Ream(x, ema) -> Attained(x))\nforall x (Ream(x, anna) -> Cosmogenic(x))\n\nnot Illusory(ronnie)\n\nWaive(ronnie, ema) and forall x (Waive(x, ema) -> Illusory(x)) -> therefore Illusory(ronnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The kyrstin colourize the maryrose. The kyrstin colourize the alena. The robb is speechless. The robb colourize the kyrstin. The robb pave the maryrose. The robb fashion the kyrstin. The robb fashion the maryrose. The maryrose colourize the robb. The maryrose colourize the alena. The maryrose fashion the alena. The alena is speechless. The alena pave the robb. If someone is xviii then they see the kyrstin. If the maryrose pave the kyrstin then the maryrose fashion the kyrstin. If someone colourize the robb then they are luculent. If someone is luculent and they visit the alena then they see the kyrstin. If someone fashion the robb then they are rejoicing. If someone fashion the kyrstin then they are speechless. The maryrose pave the kyrstin.", "logic": "\nColourize(kyrstin, maryrose)\nColourize(kyrstin, alena)\nSpeechless(robb)\nColourize(robb, kyrstin)\nPave(robb, maryrose)\nFashion(robb, kyrstin)\nFashion(robb, maryrose)\nColourize(maryrose, robb)\nColourize(maryrose, alena)\nFashion(maryrose, alena)\nSpeechless(alena)\nPave(alena, robb)\nforall x (Xviii(x) -> Pave(x, kyrstin))\nPave(maryrose, kyrstin) -> Fashion(maryrose, kyrstin)\nforall x (Colourize(x, robb) -> Luculent(x))\nforall x (Luculent(x) and Fashion(x, alena) -> Pave(x, kyrstin))\nforall x (Fashion(x, robb) -> Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Fashion(x, kyrstin) -> Speechless(x))\n\nPave(maryrose, kyrstin)\n\nColourize(maryrose, robb) and forall x (Colourize(x, robb) -> Luculent(x)) -> therefore Luculent(maryrose) Luculent(maryrose) and Fashion(maryrose, alena) and forall x (Luculent(x) and Fashion(x, alena) -> Pave(x, kyrstin)) -> therefore Pave(maryrose, kyrstin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The devina dulcorate the aprilette. The devina dulcorate the sonny. The abigael is shimmery. The abigael dulcorate the devina. The abigael slouch the aprilette. The abigael plague the devina. The abigael plague the aprilette. The aprilette dulcorate the abigael. The aprilette dulcorate the sonny. The aprilette plague the sonny. The sonny is shimmery. The sonny slouch the abigael. If someone is fain then they see the devina. If the aprilette slouch the devina then the aprilette plague the devina. If someone dulcorate the abigael then they are grasping. If someone is grasping and they visit the sonny then they see the devina. If someone plague the abigael then they are reasonable. If someone plague the devina then they are shimmery. The aprilette does not see the devina.", "logic": "\nDulcorate(devina, aprilette)\nDulcorate(devina, sonny)\nShimmery(abigael)\nDulcorate(abigael, devina)\nSlouch(abigael, aprilette)\nPlague(abigael, devina)\nPlague(abigael, aprilette)\nDulcorate(aprilette, abigael)\nDulcorate(aprilette, sonny)\nPlague(aprilette, sonny)\nShimmery(sonny)\nSlouch(sonny, abigael)\nforall x (Fain(x) -> Slouch(x, devina))\nSlouch(aprilette, devina) -> Plague(aprilette, devina)\nforall x (Dulcorate(x, abigael) -> Grasping(x))\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Plague(x, sonny) -> Slouch(x, devina))\nforall x (Plague(x, abigael) -> Reasonable(x))\nforall x (Plague(x, devina) -> Shimmery(x))\n\nnot Slouch(aprilette, devina)\n\nDulcorate(aprilette, abigael) and forall x (Dulcorate(x, abigael) -> Grasping(x)) -> therefore Grasping(aprilette) Grasping(aprilette) and Plague(aprilette, sonny) and forall x (Grasping(x) and Plague(x, sonny) -> Slouch(x, devina)) -> therefore Slouch(aprilette, devina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The billy experience the helyn. The billy experience the ediva. The lia is solemn. The lia experience the billy. The lia smash the helyn. The lia ascertain the billy. The lia ascertain the helyn. The helyn experience the lia. The helyn experience the ediva. The helyn ascertain the ediva. The ediva is solemn. The ediva smash the lia. If someone is beguiled then they see the billy. If the helyn smash the billy then the helyn ascertain the billy. If someone experience the lia then they are manful. If someone is manful and they visit the ediva then they see the billy. If someone ascertain the lia then they are zairean. If someone ascertain the billy then they are solemn. The billy is not manful.", "logic": "\nExperience(billy, helyn)\nExperience(billy, ediva)\nSolemn(lia)\nExperience(lia, billy)\nSmash(lia, helyn)\nAscertain(lia, billy)\nAscertain(lia, helyn)\nExperience(helyn, lia)\nExperience(helyn, ediva)\nAscertain(helyn, ediva)\nSolemn(ediva)\nSmash(ediva, lia)\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> Smash(x, billy))\nSmash(helyn, billy) -> Ascertain(helyn, billy)\nforall x (Experience(x, lia) -> Manful(x))\nforall x (Manful(x) and Ascertain(x, ediva) -> Smash(x, billy))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, lia) -> Zairean(x))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, billy) -> Solemn(x))\n\nnot Manful(billy)\n\nforall x (Experience(x, lia) -> Manful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The margie bust the shumeet. The margie bust the farah. The laurice is exilic. The laurice bust the margie. The laurice will the shumeet. The laurice pigment the margie. The laurice pigment the shumeet. The shumeet bust the laurice. The shumeet bust the farah. The shumeet pigment the farah. The farah is exilic. The farah will the laurice. If someone is sinkable then they see the margie. If the shumeet will the margie then the shumeet pigment the margie. If someone bust the laurice then they are urceolate. If someone is urceolate and they visit the farah then they see the margie. If someone pigment the laurice then they are tatty. If someone pigment the margie then they are exilic. The shumeet is tatty.", "logic": "\nBust(margie, shumeet)\nBust(margie, farah)\nExilic(laurice)\nBust(laurice, margie)\nWill(laurice, shumeet)\nPigment(laurice, margie)\nPigment(laurice, shumeet)\nBust(shumeet, laurice)\nBust(shumeet, farah)\nPigment(shumeet, farah)\nExilic(farah)\nWill(farah, laurice)\nforall x (Sinkable(x) -> Will(x, margie))\nWill(shumeet, margie) -> Pigment(shumeet, margie)\nforall x (Bust(x, laurice) -> Urceolate(x))\nforall x (Urceolate(x) and Pigment(x, farah) -> Will(x, margie))\nforall x (Pigment(x, laurice) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Pigment(x, margie) -> Exilic(x))\n\nTatty(shumeet)\n\nforall x (Pigment(x, laurice) -> Tatty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The donn assonate the kailey. The donn assonate the linet. The dareen is circinate. The dareen assonate the donn. The dareen canoodle the kailey. The dareen relish the donn. The dareen relish the kailey. The kailey assonate the dareen. The kailey assonate the linet. The kailey relish the linet. The linet is circinate. The linet canoodle the dareen. If someone is shagged then they see the donn. If the kailey canoodle the donn then the kailey relish the donn. If someone assonate the dareen then they are expiatory. If someone is expiatory and they visit the linet then they see the donn. If someone relish the dareen then they are windburnt. If someone relish the donn then they are circinate. The donn is not windburnt.", "logic": "\nAssonate(donn, kailey)\nAssonate(donn, linet)\nCircinate(dareen)\nAssonate(dareen, donn)\nCanoodle(dareen, kailey)\nRelish(dareen, donn)\nRelish(dareen, kailey)\nAssonate(kailey, dareen)\nAssonate(kailey, linet)\nRelish(kailey, linet)\nCircinate(linet)\nCanoodle(linet, dareen)\nforall x (Shagged(x) -> Canoodle(x, donn))\nCanoodle(kailey, donn) -> Relish(kailey, donn)\nforall x (Assonate(x, dareen) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and Relish(x, linet) -> Canoodle(x, donn))\nforall x (Relish(x, dareen) -> Windburnt(x))\nforall x (Relish(x, donn) -> Circinate(x))\n\nnot Windburnt(donn)\n\nforall x (Relish(x, dareen) -> Windburnt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The roseann damn the lukas. The roseann damn the saw. The price is flush. The price damn the roseann. The price carnify the lukas. The price spud the roseann. The price spud the lukas. The lukas damn the price. The lukas damn the saw. The lukas spud the saw. The saw is flush. The saw carnify the price. If someone is ocellated then they see the roseann. If the lukas carnify the roseann then the lukas spud the roseann. If someone damn the price then they are bold. If someone is bold and they visit the saw then they see the roseann. If someone spud the price then they are astir. If someone spud the roseann then they are flush. The lukas is kind.", "logic": "\nDamn(roseann, lukas)\nDamn(roseann, saw)\nFlush(price)\nDamn(price, roseann)\nCarnify(price, lukas)\nSpud(price, roseann)\nSpud(price, lukas)\nDamn(lukas, price)\nDamn(lukas, saw)\nSpud(lukas, saw)\nFlush(saw)\nCarnify(saw, price)\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> Carnify(x, roseann))\nCarnify(lukas, roseann) -> Spud(lukas, roseann)\nforall x (Damn(x, price) -> Bold(x))\nforall x (Bold(x) and Spud(x, saw) -> Carnify(x, roseann))\nforall x (Spud(x, price) -> Astir(x))\nforall x (Spud(x, roseann) -> Flush(x))\n\nKind(lukas)\n\nKind(lukas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The tomas discolor the mamie. The tomas discolor the kat. The forbes is laudatory. The forbes discolor the tomas. The forbes take the mamie. The forbes prerecord the tomas. The forbes prerecord the mamie. The mamie discolor the forbes. The mamie discolor the kat. The mamie prerecord the kat. The kat is laudatory. The kat take the forbes. If someone is papillose then they see the tomas. If the mamie take the tomas then the mamie prerecord the tomas. If someone discolor the forbes then they are lukewarm. If someone is lukewarm and they visit the kat then they see the tomas. If someone prerecord the forbes then they are threadlike. If someone prerecord the tomas then they are laudatory. The mamie does not like the tomas.", "logic": "\nDiscolor(tomas, mamie)\nDiscolor(tomas, kat)\nLaudatory(forbes)\nDiscolor(forbes, tomas)\nTake(forbes, mamie)\nPrerecord(forbes, tomas)\nPrerecord(forbes, mamie)\nDiscolor(mamie, forbes)\nDiscolor(mamie, kat)\nPrerecord(mamie, kat)\nLaudatory(kat)\nTake(kat, forbes)\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Take(x, tomas))\nTake(mamie, tomas) -> Prerecord(mamie, tomas)\nforall x (Discolor(x, forbes) -> Lukewarm(x))\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) and Prerecord(x, kat) -> Take(x, tomas))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, forbes) -> Threadlike(x))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, tomas) -> Laudatory(x))\n\nnot Discolor(mamie, tomas)\n\nnot Discolor(mamie, tomas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The cynthia nitpick the willey. The cynthia nitpick the abbey. The rubin is crazy. The rubin nitpick the cynthia. The rubin munch the willey. The rubin assemble the cynthia. The rubin assemble the willey. The willey nitpick the rubin. The willey nitpick the abbey. The willey assemble the abbey. The abbey is crazy. The abbey munch the rubin. If someone is markovian then they see the cynthia. If the willey munch the cynthia then the willey assemble the cynthia. If someone nitpick the rubin then they are situated. If someone is situated and they visit the abbey then they see the cynthia. If someone assemble the rubin then they are dacitic. If someone assemble the cynthia then they are crazy. The abbey munch the willey.", "logic": "\nNitpick(cynthia, willey)\nNitpick(cynthia, abbey)\nCrazy(rubin)\nNitpick(rubin, cynthia)\nMunch(rubin, willey)\nAssemble(rubin, cynthia)\nAssemble(rubin, willey)\nNitpick(willey, rubin)\nNitpick(willey, abbey)\nAssemble(willey, abbey)\nCrazy(abbey)\nMunch(abbey, rubin)\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Munch(x, cynthia))\nMunch(willey, cynthia) -> Assemble(willey, cynthia)\nforall x (Nitpick(x, rubin) -> Situated(x))\nforall x (Situated(x) and Assemble(x, abbey) -> Munch(x, cynthia))\nforall x (Assemble(x, rubin) -> Dacitic(x))\nforall x (Assemble(x, cynthia) -> Crazy(x))\n\nMunch(abbey, willey)\n\nMunch(abbey, willey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "The renee saint the tracy. The reena is welfarist. The reena is redeemable. The reena is sprawling. The tracy festinate the melania. The melania festinate the tracy. The melania is sprawling. If the reena saint the renee and the renee prolong the melania then the renee saint the reena. If something is welfarist then it saint the renee. If something is sprawling and it saint the renee then the renee festinate the melania. If something saint the reena then it saint the tracy. If something saint the renee and it is welfarist then the renee saint the reena. If something prolong the melania and it prolong the reena then the melania saint the renee. The tracy festinate the melania.", "logic": "\nSaint(renee, tracy)\nWelfarist(reena)\nRedeemable(reena)\nSprawling(reena)\nFestinate(tracy, melania)\nFestinate(melania, tracy)\nSprawling(melania)\nSaint(reena, renee) and Prolong(renee, melania) -> Saint(renee, reena)\nforall x (Welfarist(x) -> Saint(x, renee))\nforall x (Sprawling(x) and Saint(x, renee) -> Festinate(renee, melania))\nforall x (Saint(x, reena) -> Saint(x, tracy))\nforall x (Saint(x, renee) and Welfarist(x) -> Saint(renee, reena))\nforall x (Prolong(x, melania) and Prolong(x, reena) -> Saint(melania, renee))\n\nFestinate(tracy, melania)\n\ntherefore Festinate(tracy, melania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The amaleta underpin the dari. The wally is valid. The wally is looted. The wally is puppylike. The dari thumb the fulton. The fulton thumb the dari. The fulton is puppylike. If the wally underpin the amaleta and the amaleta rain the fulton then the amaleta underpin the wally. If something is valid then it underpin the amaleta. If something is puppylike and it underpin the amaleta then the amaleta thumb the fulton. If something underpin the wally then it underpin the dari. If something underpin the amaleta and it is valid then the amaleta underpin the wally. If something rain the fulton and it rain the wally then the fulton underpin the amaleta. The dari does not chase the fulton.", "logic": "\nUnderpin(amaleta, dari)\nValid(wally)\nLooted(wally)\nPuppylike(wally)\nThumb(dari, fulton)\nThumb(fulton, dari)\nPuppylike(fulton)\nUnderpin(wally, amaleta) and Rain(amaleta, fulton) -> Underpin(amaleta, wally)\nforall x (Valid(x) -> Underpin(x, amaleta))\nforall x (Puppylike(x) and Underpin(x, amaleta) -> Thumb(amaleta, fulton))\nforall x (Underpin(x, wally) -> Underpin(x, dari))\nforall x (Underpin(x, amaleta) and Valid(x) -> Underpin(amaleta, wally))\nforall x (Rain(x, fulton) and Rain(x, wally) -> Underpin(fulton, amaleta))\n\nnot Thumb(dari, fulton)\n\ntherefore Thumb(dari, fulton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The annalise customise the clayborn. The sorcha is anaerobic. The sorcha is adjuratory. The sorcha is tenebrous. The clayborn pervert the winn. The winn pervert the clayborn. The winn is tenebrous. If the sorcha customise the annalise and the annalise ticktock the winn then the annalise customise the sorcha. If something is anaerobic then it customise the annalise. If something is tenebrous and it customise the annalise then the annalise pervert the winn. If something customise the sorcha then it customise the clayborn. If something customise the annalise and it is anaerobic then the annalise customise the sorcha. If something ticktock the winn and it ticktock the sorcha then the winn customise the annalise. The sorcha customise the annalise.", "logic": "\nCustomise(annalise, clayborn)\nAnaerobic(sorcha)\nAdjuratory(sorcha)\nTenebrous(sorcha)\nPervert(clayborn, winn)\nPervert(winn, clayborn)\nTenebrous(winn)\nCustomise(sorcha, annalise) and Ticktock(annalise, winn) -> Customise(annalise, sorcha)\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Customise(x, annalise))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) and Customise(x, annalise) -> Pervert(annalise, winn))\nforall x (Customise(x, sorcha) -> Customise(x, clayborn))\nforall x (Customise(x, annalise) and Anaerobic(x) -> Customise(annalise, sorcha))\nforall x (Ticktock(x, winn) and Ticktock(x, sorcha) -> Customise(winn, annalise))\n\nCustomise(sorcha, annalise)\n\nAnaerobic(sorcha) and forall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Customise(x, annalise)) -> therefore Customise(sorcha, annalise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The linette factor the joannes. The selinda is volute. The selinda is unfunny. The selinda is sufficient. The joannes forecast the raoul. The raoul forecast the joannes. The raoul is sufficient. If the selinda factor the linette and the linette ascend the raoul then the linette factor the selinda. If something is volute then it factor the linette. If something is sufficient and it factor the linette then the linette forecast the raoul. If something factor the selinda then it factor the joannes. If something factor the linette and it is volute then the linette factor the selinda. If something ascend the raoul and it ascend the selinda then the raoul factor the linette. The selinda does not visit the linette.", "logic": "\nFactor(linette, joannes)\nVolute(selinda)\nUnfunny(selinda)\nSufficient(selinda)\nForecast(joannes, raoul)\nForecast(raoul, joannes)\nSufficient(raoul)\nFactor(selinda, linette) and Ascend(linette, raoul) -> Factor(linette, selinda)\nforall x (Volute(x) -> Factor(x, linette))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) and Factor(x, linette) -> Forecast(linette, raoul))\nforall x (Factor(x, selinda) -> Factor(x, joannes))\nforall x (Factor(x, linette) and Volute(x) -> Factor(linette, selinda))\nforall x (Ascend(x, raoul) and Ascend(x, selinda) -> Factor(raoul, linette))\n\nnot Factor(selinda, linette)\n\nVolute(selinda) and forall x (Volute(x) -> Factor(x, linette)) -> therefore Factor(selinda, linette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The brooke solace the gaspar. The erny is koranic. The erny is legless. The erny is tunisian. The gaspar criticize the grissel. The grissel criticize the gaspar. The grissel is tunisian. If the erny solace the brooke and the brooke sock the grissel then the brooke solace the erny. If something is koranic then it solace the brooke. If something is tunisian and it solace the brooke then the brooke criticize the grissel. If something solace the erny then it solace the gaspar. If something solace the brooke and it is koranic then the brooke solace the erny. If something sock the grissel and it sock the erny then the grissel solace the brooke. The brooke solace the erny.", "logic": "\nSolace(brooke, gaspar)\nKoranic(erny)\nLegless(erny)\nTunisian(erny)\nCriticize(gaspar, grissel)\nCriticize(grissel, gaspar)\nTunisian(grissel)\nSolace(erny, brooke) and Sock(brooke, grissel) -> Solace(brooke, erny)\nforall x (Koranic(x) -> Solace(x, brooke))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and Solace(x, brooke) -> Criticize(brooke, grissel))\nforall x (Solace(x, erny) -> Solace(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Solace(x, brooke) and Koranic(x) -> Solace(brooke, erny))\nforall x (Sock(x, grissel) and Sock(x, erny) -> Solace(grissel, brooke))\n\nSolace(brooke, erny)\n\nKoranic(erny) and forall x (Koranic(x) -> Solace(x, brooke)) -> therefore Solace(erny, brooke) Solace(erny, brooke) and Koranic(erny) and forall x (Solace(x, brooke) and Koranic(x) -> Solace(brooke, erny)) -> therefore Solace(brooke, erny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The catrina corbel the maison. The tommy is tubular. The tommy is phrenic. The tommy is chordal. The maison guggle the richardo. The richardo guggle the maison. The richardo is chordal. If the tommy corbel the catrina and the catrina ionate the richardo then the catrina corbel the tommy. If something is tubular then it corbel the catrina. If something is chordal and it corbel the catrina then the catrina guggle the richardo. If something corbel the tommy then it corbel the maison. If something corbel the catrina and it is tubular then the catrina corbel the tommy. If something ionate the richardo and it ionate the tommy then the richardo corbel the catrina. The catrina does not visit the tommy.", "logic": "\nCorbel(catrina, maison)\nTubular(tommy)\nPhrenic(tommy)\nChordal(tommy)\nGuggle(maison, richardo)\nGuggle(richardo, maison)\nChordal(richardo)\nCorbel(tommy, catrina) and Ionate(catrina, richardo) -> Corbel(catrina, tommy)\nforall x (Tubular(x) -> Corbel(x, catrina))\nforall x (Chordal(x) and Corbel(x, catrina) -> Guggle(catrina, richardo))\nforall x (Corbel(x, tommy) -> Corbel(x, maison))\nforall x (Corbel(x, catrina) and Tubular(x) -> Corbel(catrina, tommy))\nforall x (Ionate(x, richardo) and Ionate(x, tommy) -> Corbel(richardo, catrina))\n\nnot Corbel(catrina, tommy)\n\nTubular(tommy) and forall x (Tubular(x) -> Corbel(x, catrina)) -> therefore Corbel(tommy, catrina) Corbel(tommy, catrina) and Tubular(tommy) and forall x (Corbel(x, catrina) and Tubular(x) -> Corbel(catrina, tommy)) -> therefore Corbel(catrina, tommy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The brewer scotch the herb. The breena is pietistic. The breena is geocentric. The breena is eukaryotic. The herb spangle the christel. The christel spangle the herb. The christel is eukaryotic. If the breena scotch the brewer and the brewer shipwreck the christel then the brewer scotch the breena. If something is pietistic then it scotch the brewer. If something is eukaryotic and it scotch the brewer then the brewer spangle the christel. If something scotch the breena then it scotch the herb. If something scotch the brewer and it is pietistic then the brewer scotch the breena. If something shipwreck the christel and it shipwreck the breena then the christel scotch the brewer. The brewer does not visit the brewer.", "logic": "\nScotch(brewer, herb)\nPietistic(breena)\nGeocentric(breena)\nEukaryotic(breena)\nSpangle(herb, christel)\nSpangle(christel, herb)\nEukaryotic(christel)\nScotch(breena, brewer) and Shipwreck(brewer, christel) -> Scotch(brewer, breena)\nforall x (Pietistic(x) -> Scotch(x, brewer))\nforall x (Eukaryotic(x) and Scotch(x, brewer) -> Spangle(brewer, christel))\nforall x (Scotch(x, breena) -> Scotch(x, herb))\nforall x (Scotch(x, brewer) and Pietistic(x) -> Scotch(brewer, breena))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, christel) and Shipwreck(x, breena) -> Scotch(christel, brewer))\n\nnot Scotch(brewer, brewer)\n\nforall x (Pietistic(x) -> Scotch(x, brewer)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The lynde barbecue the harvie. The terrie is soft. The terrie is anatomic. The terrie is effective. The harvie deodourise the janean. The janean deodourise the harvie. The janean is effective. If the terrie barbecue the lynde and the lynde hector the janean then the lynde barbecue the terrie. If something is soft then it barbecue the lynde. If something is effective and it barbecue the lynde then the lynde deodourise the janean. If something barbecue the terrie then it barbecue the harvie. If something barbecue the lynde and it is soft then the lynde barbecue the terrie. If something hector the janean and it hector the terrie then the janean barbecue the lynde. The harvie barbecue the lynde.", "logic": "\nBarbecue(lynde, harvie)\nSoft(terrie)\nAnatomic(terrie)\nEffective(terrie)\nDeodourise(harvie, janean)\nDeodourise(janean, harvie)\nEffective(janean)\nBarbecue(terrie, lynde) and Hector(lynde, janean) -> Barbecue(lynde, terrie)\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Barbecue(x, lynde))\nforall x (Effective(x) and Barbecue(x, lynde) -> Deodourise(lynde, janean))\nforall x (Barbecue(x, terrie) -> Barbecue(x, harvie))\nforall x (Barbecue(x, lynde) and Soft(x) -> Barbecue(lynde, terrie))\nforall x (Hector(x, janean) and Hector(x, terrie) -> Barbecue(janean, lynde))\n\nBarbecue(harvie, lynde)\n\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Barbecue(x, lynde)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The olivia stuff the james. The aldo is renunciant. The aldo is batholitic. The aldo is notable. The james interfere the ikey. The ikey interfere the james. The ikey is notable. If the aldo stuff the olivia and the olivia demonize the ikey then the olivia stuff the aldo. If something is renunciant then it stuff the olivia. If something is notable and it stuff the olivia then the olivia interfere the ikey. If something stuff the aldo then it stuff the james. If something stuff the olivia and it is renunciant then the olivia stuff the aldo. If something demonize the ikey and it demonize the aldo then the ikey stuff the olivia. The ikey does not visit the olivia.", "logic": "\nStuff(olivia, james)\nRenunciant(aldo)\nBatholitic(aldo)\nNotable(aldo)\nInterfere(james, ikey)\nInterfere(ikey, james)\nNotable(ikey)\nStuff(aldo, olivia) and Demonize(olivia, ikey) -> Stuff(olivia, aldo)\nforall x (Renunciant(x) -> Stuff(x, olivia))\nforall x (Notable(x) and Stuff(x, olivia) -> Interfere(olivia, ikey))\nforall x (Stuff(x, aldo) -> Stuff(x, james))\nforall x (Stuff(x, olivia) and Renunciant(x) -> Stuff(olivia, aldo))\nforall x (Demonize(x, ikey) and Demonize(x, aldo) -> Stuff(ikey, olivia))\n\nnot Stuff(ikey, olivia)\n\nforall x (Renunciant(x) -> Stuff(x, olivia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The marijo vandalise the bjorne. The reeva is millennial. The reeva is chlorotic. The reeva is corruptive. The bjorne fulfil the jobina. The jobina fulfil the bjorne. The jobina is corruptive. If the reeva vandalise the marijo and the marijo linger the jobina then the marijo vandalise the reeva. If something is millennial then it vandalise the marijo. If something is corruptive and it vandalise the marijo then the marijo fulfil the jobina. If something vandalise the reeva then it vandalise the bjorne. If something vandalise the marijo and it is millennial then the marijo vandalise the reeva. If something linger the jobina and it linger the reeva then the jobina vandalise the marijo. The marijo is kind.", "logic": "\nVandalise(marijo, bjorne)\nMillennial(reeva)\nChlorotic(reeva)\nCorruptive(reeva)\nFulfil(bjorne, jobina)\nFulfil(jobina, bjorne)\nCorruptive(jobina)\nVandalise(reeva, marijo) and Linger(marijo, jobina) -> Vandalise(marijo, reeva)\nforall x (Millennial(x) -> Vandalise(x, marijo))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) and Vandalise(x, marijo) -> Fulfil(marijo, jobina))\nforall x (Vandalise(x, reeva) -> Vandalise(x, bjorne))\nforall x (Vandalise(x, marijo) and Millennial(x) -> Vandalise(marijo, reeva))\nforall x (Linger(x, jobina) and Linger(x, reeva) -> Vandalise(jobina, marijo))\n\nKind(marijo)\n\nKind(marijo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The tabby heist the odelle. The saxe is stringent. The saxe is branchial. The saxe is delphic. The odelle jellify the richard. The richard jellify the odelle. The richard is delphic. If the saxe heist the tabby and the tabby horse the richard then the tabby heist the saxe. If something is stringent then it heist the tabby. If something is delphic and it heist the tabby then the tabby jellify the richard. If something heist the saxe then it heist the odelle. If something heist the tabby and it is stringent then the tabby heist the saxe. If something horse the richard and it horse the saxe then the richard heist the tabby. The richard does not need the tabby.", "logic": "\nHeist(tabby, odelle)\nStringent(saxe)\nBranchial(saxe)\nDelphic(saxe)\nJellify(odelle, richard)\nJellify(richard, odelle)\nDelphic(richard)\nHeist(saxe, tabby) and Horse(tabby, richard) -> Heist(tabby, saxe)\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Heist(x, tabby))\nforall x (Delphic(x) and Heist(x, tabby) -> Jellify(tabby, richard))\nforall x (Heist(x, saxe) -> Heist(x, odelle))\nforall x (Heist(x, tabby) and Stringent(x) -> Heist(tabby, saxe))\nforall x (Horse(x, richard) and Horse(x, saxe) -> Heist(richard, tabby))\n\nnot Horse(richard, tabby)\n\nnot Horse(richard, tabby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The irvine heckle the michal. The arlette is uncurbed. The arlette is filiform. The arlette is biped. The michal forfend the wyatan. The wyatan forfend the michal. The wyatan is biped. If the arlette heckle the irvine and the irvine quiz the wyatan then the irvine heckle the arlette. If something is uncurbed then it heckle the irvine. If something is biped and it heckle the irvine then the irvine forfend the wyatan. If something heckle the arlette then it heckle the michal. If something heckle the irvine and it is uncurbed then the irvine heckle the arlette. If something quiz the wyatan and it quiz the arlette then the wyatan heckle the irvine. The wyatan is filiform.", "logic": "\nHeckle(irvine, michal)\nUncurbed(arlette)\nFiliform(arlette)\nBiped(arlette)\nForfend(michal, wyatan)\nForfend(wyatan, michal)\nBiped(wyatan)\nHeckle(arlette, irvine) and Quiz(irvine, wyatan) -> Heckle(irvine, arlette)\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) -> Heckle(x, irvine))\nforall x (Biped(x) and Heckle(x, irvine) -> Forfend(irvine, wyatan))\nforall x (Heckle(x, arlette) -> Heckle(x, michal))\nforall x (Heckle(x, irvine) and Uncurbed(x) -> Heckle(irvine, arlette))\nforall x (Quiz(x, wyatan) and Quiz(x, arlette) -> Heckle(wyatan, irvine))\n\nFiliform(wyatan)\n\nFiliform(wyatan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The dwayne patter the kellia. The dwayne swoon the kellia. The kyle is particular. The kyle patter the dwayne. The kyle swoon the dwayne. The kellia is incurious. The kellia wallpaper the kyle. If someone is incurious and they visit the dwayne then the dwayne wallpaper the kyle. If someone is incurious then they visit the dwayne. If someone wallpaper the kellia and the kellia patter the kyle then the kellia swoon the kyle. If someone is particular then they need the dwayne. If someone wallpaper the kyle and they need the kellia then the kyle is engraved. If someone patter the kellia then the kellia is incurious. The kellia is incurious.", "logic": "\nPatter(dwayne, kellia)\nSwoon(dwayne, kellia)\nParticular(kyle)\nPatter(kyle, dwayne)\nSwoon(kyle, dwayne)\nIncurious(kellia)\nWallpaper(kellia, kyle)\nforall x (Incurious(x) and Swoon(x, dwayne) -> Wallpaper(dwayne, kyle))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Swoon(x, dwayne))\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, kellia) and Patter(kellia, kyle) -> Swoon(kellia, kyle))\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Wallpaper(x, dwayne))\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, kyle) and Wallpaper(x, kellia) -> Engraved(kyle))\nforall x (Patter(x, kellia) -> Incurious(kellia))\n\nIncurious(kellia)\n\ntherefore Incurious(kellia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The rubina hibernate the katusha. The rubina clarify the katusha. The diannne is reposeful. The diannne hibernate the rubina. The diannne clarify the rubina. The katusha is vicious. The katusha gallop the diannne. If someone is vicious and they visit the rubina then the rubina gallop the diannne. If someone is vicious then they visit the rubina. If someone gallop the katusha and the katusha hibernate the diannne then the katusha clarify the diannne. If someone is reposeful then they need the rubina. If someone gallop the diannne and they need the katusha then the diannne is costal. If someone hibernate the katusha then the katusha is vicious. The rubina does not like the katusha.", "logic": "\nHibernate(rubina, katusha)\nClarify(rubina, katusha)\nReposeful(diannne)\nHibernate(diannne, rubina)\nClarify(diannne, rubina)\nVicious(katusha)\nGallop(katusha, diannne)\nforall x (Vicious(x) and Clarify(x, rubina) -> Gallop(rubina, diannne))\nforall x (Vicious(x) -> Clarify(x, rubina))\nforall x (Gallop(x, katusha) and Hibernate(katusha, diannne) -> Clarify(katusha, diannne))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Gallop(x, rubina))\nforall x (Gallop(x, diannne) and Gallop(x, katusha) -> Costal(diannne))\nforall x (Hibernate(x, katusha) -> Vicious(katusha))\n\nnot Hibernate(rubina, katusha)\n\ntherefore Hibernate(rubina, katusha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The wilbert causeway the rene. The wilbert autotomize the rene. The puff is unsalted. The puff causeway the wilbert. The puff autotomize the wilbert. The rene is unplayful. The rene barge the puff. If someone is unplayful and they visit the wilbert then the wilbert barge the puff. If someone is unplayful then they visit the wilbert. If someone barge the rene and the rene causeway the puff then the rene autotomize the puff. If someone is unsalted then they need the wilbert. If someone barge the puff and they need the rene then the puff is racemose. If someone causeway the rene then the rene is unplayful. The puff barge the wilbert.", "logic": "\nCauseway(wilbert, rene)\nAutotomize(wilbert, rene)\nUnsalted(puff)\nCauseway(puff, wilbert)\nAutotomize(puff, wilbert)\nUnplayful(rene)\nBarge(rene, puff)\nforall x (Unplayful(x) and Autotomize(x, wilbert) -> Barge(wilbert, puff))\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Autotomize(x, wilbert))\nforall x (Barge(x, rene) and Causeway(rene, puff) -> Autotomize(rene, puff))\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> Barge(x, wilbert))\nforall x (Barge(x, puff) and Barge(x, rene) -> Racemose(puff))\nforall x (Causeway(x, rene) -> Unplayful(rene))\n\nBarge(puff, wilbert)\n\nUnsalted(puff) and forall x (Unsalted(x) -> Barge(x, wilbert)) -> therefore Barge(puff, wilbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The renell connect the sheba. The renell chew the sheba. The vikky is popeyed. The vikky connect the renell. The vikky chew the renell. The sheba is dilute. The sheba splash the vikky. If someone is dilute and they visit the renell then the renell splash the vikky. If someone is dilute then they visit the renell. If someone splash the sheba and the sheba connect the vikky then the sheba chew the vikky. If someone is popeyed then they need the renell. If someone splash the vikky and they need the sheba then the vikky is amerindic. If someone connect the sheba then the sheba is dilute. The sheba does not visit the renell.", "logic": "\nConnect(renell, sheba)\nChew(renell, sheba)\nPopeyed(vikky)\nConnect(vikky, renell)\nChew(vikky, renell)\nDilute(sheba)\nSplash(sheba, vikky)\nforall x (Dilute(x) and Chew(x, renell) -> Splash(renell, vikky))\nforall x (Dilute(x) -> Chew(x, renell))\nforall x (Splash(x, sheba) and Connect(sheba, vikky) -> Chew(sheba, vikky))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) -> Splash(x, renell))\nforall x (Splash(x, vikky) and Splash(x, sheba) -> Amerindic(vikky))\nforall x (Connect(x, sheba) -> Dilute(sheba))\n\nnot Chew(sheba, renell)\n\nDilute(sheba) and forall x (Dilute(x) -> Chew(x, renell)) -> therefore Chew(sheba, renell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The rosella scam the eloise. The rosella eddy the eloise. The normand is postwar. The normand scam the rosella. The normand eddy the rosella. The eloise is slavish. The eloise martyr the normand. If someone is slavish and they visit the rosella then the rosella martyr the normand. If someone is slavish then they visit the rosella. If someone martyr the eloise and the eloise scam the normand then the eloise eddy the normand. If someone is postwar then they need the rosella. If someone martyr the normand and they need the eloise then the normand is untapped. If someone scam the eloise then the eloise is slavish. The rosella martyr the normand.", "logic": "\nScam(rosella, eloise)\nEddy(rosella, eloise)\nPostwar(normand)\nScam(normand, rosella)\nEddy(normand, rosella)\nSlavish(eloise)\nMartyr(eloise, normand)\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Eddy(x, rosella) -> Martyr(rosella, normand))\nforall x (Slavish(x) -> Eddy(x, rosella))\nforall x (Martyr(x, eloise) and Scam(eloise, normand) -> Eddy(eloise, normand))\nforall x (Postwar(x) -> Martyr(x, rosella))\nforall x (Martyr(x, normand) and Martyr(x, eloise) -> Untapped(normand))\nforall x (Scam(x, eloise) -> Slavish(eloise))\n\nMartyr(rosella, normand)\n\nSlavish(eloise) and forall x (Slavish(x) -> Eddy(x, rosella)) -> therefore Eddy(eloise, rosella) Slavish(eloise) and Eddy(eloise, rosella) and forall x (Slavish(x) and Eddy(x, rosella) -> Martyr(rosella, normand)) -> therefore Martyr(rosella, normand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The thomas upbraid the maridel. The thomas systemise the maridel. The penni is fanged. The penni upbraid the thomas. The penni systemise the thomas. The maridel is austral. The maridel exacerbate the penni. If someone is austral and they visit the thomas then the thomas exacerbate the penni. If someone is austral then they visit the thomas. If someone exacerbate the maridel and the maridel upbraid the penni then the maridel systemise the penni. If someone is fanged then they need the thomas. If someone exacerbate the penni and they need the maridel then the penni is suasible. If someone upbraid the maridel then the maridel is austral. The thomas does not need the penni.", "logic": "\nUpbraid(thomas, maridel)\nSystemise(thomas, maridel)\nFanged(penni)\nUpbraid(penni, thomas)\nSystemise(penni, thomas)\nAustral(maridel)\nExacerbate(maridel, penni)\nforall x (Austral(x) and Systemise(x, thomas) -> Exacerbate(thomas, penni))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Systemise(x, thomas))\nforall x (Exacerbate(x, maridel) and Upbraid(maridel, penni) -> Systemise(maridel, penni))\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Exacerbate(x, thomas))\nforall x (Exacerbate(x, penni) and Exacerbate(x, maridel) -> Suasible(penni))\nforall x (Upbraid(x, maridel) -> Austral(maridel))\n\nnot Exacerbate(thomas, penni)\n\nAustral(maridel) and forall x (Austral(x) -> Systemise(x, thomas)) -> therefore Systemise(maridel, thomas) Austral(maridel) and Systemise(maridel, thomas) and forall x (Austral(x) and Systemise(x, thomas) -> Exacerbate(thomas, penni)) -> therefore Exacerbate(thomas, penni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The charleton decolour the una. The charleton matte the una. The jesselyn is sage. The jesselyn decolour the charleton. The jesselyn matte the charleton. The una is lusterless. The una discipline the jesselyn. If someone is lusterless and they visit the charleton then the charleton discipline the jesselyn. If someone is lusterless then they visit the charleton. If someone discipline the una and the una decolour the jesselyn then the una matte the jesselyn. If someone is sage then they need the charleton. If someone discipline the jesselyn and they need the una then the jesselyn is detected. If someone decolour the una then the una is lusterless. The charleton does not need the charleton.", "logic": "\nDecolour(charleton, una)\nMatte(charleton, una)\nSage(jesselyn)\nDecolour(jesselyn, charleton)\nMatte(jesselyn, charleton)\nLusterless(una)\nDiscipline(una, jesselyn)\nforall x (Lusterless(x) and Matte(x, charleton) -> Discipline(charleton, jesselyn))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Matte(x, charleton))\nforall x (Discipline(x, una) and Decolour(una, jesselyn) -> Matte(una, jesselyn))\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Discipline(x, charleton))\nforall x (Discipline(x, jesselyn) and Discipline(x, una) -> Detected(jesselyn))\nforall x (Decolour(x, una) -> Lusterless(una))\n\nnot Discipline(charleton, charleton)\n\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Discipline(x, charleton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The berty fashion the bertina. The berty better the bertina. The nellie is cracked. The nellie fashion the berty. The nellie better the berty. The bertina is flaccid. The bertina tile the nellie. If someone is flaccid and they visit the berty then the berty tile the nellie. If someone is flaccid then they visit the berty. If someone tile the bertina and the bertina fashion the nellie then the bertina better the nellie. If someone is cracked then they need the berty. If someone tile the nellie and they need the bertina then the nellie is parvenue. If someone fashion the bertina then the bertina is flaccid. The berty better the berty.", "logic": "\nFashion(berty, bertina)\nBetter(berty, bertina)\nCracked(nellie)\nFashion(nellie, berty)\nBetter(nellie, berty)\nFlaccid(bertina)\nTile(bertina, nellie)\nforall x (Flaccid(x) and Better(x, berty) -> Tile(berty, nellie))\nforall x (Flaccid(x) -> Better(x, berty))\nforall x (Tile(x, bertina) and Fashion(bertina, nellie) -> Better(bertina, nellie))\nforall x (Cracked(x) -> Tile(x, berty))\nforall x (Tile(x, nellie) and Tile(x, bertina) -> Parvenue(nellie))\nforall x (Fashion(x, bertina) -> Flaccid(bertina))\n\nBetter(berty, berty)\n\nforall x (Flaccid(x) -> Better(x, berty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The staci introduce the alidia. The staci pioneer the alidia. The natalia is chic. The natalia introduce the staci. The natalia pioneer the staci. The alidia is vacillant. The alidia collogue the natalia. If someone is vacillant and they visit the staci then the staci collogue the natalia. If someone is vacillant then they visit the staci. If someone collogue the alidia and the alidia introduce the natalia then the alidia pioneer the natalia. If someone is chic then they need the staci. If someone collogue the natalia and they need the alidia then the natalia is ascetic. If someone introduce the alidia then the alidia is vacillant. The alidia does not need the staci.", "logic": "\nIntroduce(staci, alidia)\nPioneer(staci, alidia)\nChic(natalia)\nIntroduce(natalia, staci)\nPioneer(natalia, staci)\nVacillant(alidia)\nCollogue(alidia, natalia)\nforall x (Vacillant(x) and Pioneer(x, staci) -> Collogue(staci, natalia))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Pioneer(x, staci))\nforall x (Collogue(x, alidia) and Introduce(alidia, natalia) -> Pioneer(alidia, natalia))\nforall x (Chic(x) -> Collogue(x, staci))\nforall x (Collogue(x, natalia) and Collogue(x, alidia) -> Ascetic(natalia))\nforall x (Introduce(x, alidia) -> Vacillant(alidia))\n\nnot Collogue(alidia, staci)\n\nforall x (Chic(x) -> Collogue(x, staci)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The del ally the sheilah. The del counteract the sheilah. The burton is deathlike. The burton ally the del. The burton counteract the del. The sheilah is bahraini. The sheilah handle the burton. If someone is bahraini and they visit the del then the del handle the burton. If someone is bahraini then they visit the del. If someone handle the sheilah and the sheilah ally the burton then the sheilah counteract the burton. If someone is deathlike then they need the del. If someone handle the burton and they need the sheilah then the burton is thin. If someone ally the sheilah then the sheilah is bahraini. The del is deathlike.", "logic": "\nAlly(del, sheilah)\nCounteract(del, sheilah)\nDeathlike(burton)\nAlly(burton, del)\nCounteract(burton, del)\nBahraini(sheilah)\nHandle(sheilah, burton)\nforall x (Bahraini(x) and Counteract(x, del) -> Handle(del, burton))\nforall x (Bahraini(x) -> Counteract(x, del))\nforall x (Handle(x, sheilah) and Ally(sheilah, burton) -> Counteract(sheilah, burton))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Handle(x, del))\nforall x (Handle(x, burton) and Handle(x, sheilah) -> Thin(burton))\nforall x (Ally(x, sheilah) -> Bahraini(sheilah))\n\nDeathlike(del)\n\nDeathlike(del) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The poul palisade the siegfried. The poul unveil the siegfried. The reggy is pharisaic. The reggy palisade the poul. The reggy unveil the poul. The siegfried is cypriot. The siegfried resole the reggy. If someone is cypriot and they visit the poul then the poul resole the reggy. If someone is cypriot then they visit the poul. If someone resole the siegfried and the siegfried palisade the reggy then the siegfried unveil the reggy. If someone is pharisaic then they need the poul. If someone resole the reggy and they need the siegfried then the reggy is escaped. If someone palisade the siegfried then the siegfried is cypriot. The siegfried does not visit the siegfried.", "logic": "\nPalisade(poul, siegfried)\nUnveil(poul, siegfried)\nPharisaic(reggy)\nPalisade(reggy, poul)\nUnveil(reggy, poul)\nCypriot(siegfried)\nResole(siegfried, reggy)\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and Unveil(x, poul) -> Resole(poul, reggy))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) -> Unveil(x, poul))\nforall x (Resole(x, siegfried) and Palisade(siegfried, reggy) -> Unveil(siegfried, reggy))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Resole(x, poul))\nforall x (Resole(x, reggy) and Resole(x, siegfried) -> Escaped(reggy))\nforall x (Palisade(x, siegfried) -> Cypriot(siegfried))\n\nnot Unveil(siegfried, siegfried)\n\nnot Unveil(siegfried, siegfried) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "The douglas shave the leorah. The douglas intumesce the leorah. The francene is anaemic. The francene shave the douglas. The francene intumesce the douglas. The leorah is disputable. The leorah till the francene. If someone is disputable and they visit the douglas then the douglas till the francene. If someone is disputable then they visit the douglas. If someone till the leorah and the leorah shave the francene then the leorah intumesce the francene. If someone is anaemic then they need the douglas. If someone till the francene and they need the leorah then the francene is valent. If someone shave the leorah then the leorah is disputable. The francene intumesce the leorah.", "logic": "\nShave(douglas, leorah)\nIntumesce(douglas, leorah)\nAnaemic(francene)\nShave(francene, douglas)\nIntumesce(francene, douglas)\nDisputable(leorah)\nTill(leorah, francene)\nforall x (Disputable(x) and Intumesce(x, douglas) -> Till(douglas, francene))\nforall x (Disputable(x) -> Intumesce(x, douglas))\nforall x (Till(x, leorah) and Shave(leorah, francene) -> Intumesce(leorah, francene))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Till(x, douglas))\nforall x (Till(x, francene) and Till(x, leorah) -> Valent(francene))\nforall x (Shave(x, leorah) -> Disputable(leorah))\n\nIntumesce(francene, leorah)\n\nIntumesce(francene, leorah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1531"} {"premises": "Flor is usurious. Flor is skyward. Flor is edged. Maureene is acellular. Maureene is usurious. Maureene is debased. Maureene is roughshod. Maureene is untrained. Maureene is skyward. Maureene is edged. Miles is acellular. Miles is usurious. Miles is debased. Miles is roughshod. Miles is skyward. All skyward things are debased. All debased things are roughshod. Maureene is untrained.", "logic": "\nUsurious(flor)\nSkyward(flor)\nEdged(flor)\nAcellular(maureene)\nUsurious(maureene)\nDebased(maureene)\nRoughshod(maureene)\nUntrained(maureene)\nSkyward(maureene)\nEdged(maureene)\nAcellular(miles)\nUsurious(miles)\nDebased(miles)\nRoughshod(miles)\nSkyward(miles)\nforall x (Skyward(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Roughshod(x))\n\nUntrained(maureene)\n\ntherefore Untrained(maureene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Amalie is pudendal. Amalie is cryogenic. Amalie is accented. Marv is unbigoted. Marv is pudendal. Marv is agaze. Marv is mixed. Marv is acting. Marv is cryogenic. Marv is accented. Archibold is unbigoted. Archibold is pudendal. Archibold is agaze. Archibold is mixed. Archibold is cryogenic. All cryogenic things are agaze. All agaze things are mixed. Archibold is not pudendal.", "logic": "\nPudendal(amalie)\nCryogenic(amalie)\nAccented(amalie)\nUnbigoted(marv)\nPudendal(marv)\nAgaze(marv)\nMixed(marv)\nActing(marv)\nCryogenic(marv)\nAccented(marv)\nUnbigoted(archibold)\nPudendal(archibold)\nAgaze(archibold)\nMixed(archibold)\nCryogenic(archibold)\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Agaze(x))\nforall x (Agaze(x) -> Mixed(x))\n\nnot Pudendal(archibold)\n\ntherefore Pudendal(archibold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Tre is definitive. Tre is heavy. Tre is genotypic. Nancee is required. Nancee is definitive. Nancee is recognised. Nancee is fleet. Nancee is inaudible. Nancee is heavy. Nancee is genotypic. Conny is required. Conny is definitive. Conny is recognised. Conny is fleet. Conny is heavy. All heavy things are recognised. All recognised things are fleet. Tre is recognised.", "logic": "\nDefinitive(tre)\nHeavy(tre)\nGenotypic(tre)\nRequired(nancee)\nDefinitive(nancee)\nRecognised(nancee)\nFleet(nancee)\nInaudible(nancee)\nHeavy(nancee)\nGenotypic(nancee)\nRequired(conny)\nDefinitive(conny)\nRecognised(conny)\nFleet(conny)\nHeavy(conny)\nforall x (Heavy(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Recognised(x) -> Fleet(x))\n\nRecognised(tre)\n\nHeavy(tre) and forall x (Heavy(x) -> Recognised(x)) -> therefore Recognised(tre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Filippa is monodic. Filippa is unspoiled. Filippa is autistic. Paulita is unclaimed. Paulita is monodic. Paulita is specific. Paulita is snuggled. Paulita is documental. Paulita is unspoiled. Paulita is autistic. Elfrida is unclaimed. Elfrida is monodic. Elfrida is specific. Elfrida is snuggled. Elfrida is unspoiled. All unspoiled things are specific. All specific things are snuggled. Filippa is not specific.", "logic": "\nMonodic(filippa)\nUnspoiled(filippa)\nAutistic(filippa)\nUnclaimed(paulita)\nMonodic(paulita)\nSpecific(paulita)\nSnuggled(paulita)\nDocumental(paulita)\nUnspoiled(paulita)\nAutistic(paulita)\nUnclaimed(elfrida)\nMonodic(elfrida)\nSpecific(elfrida)\nSnuggled(elfrida)\nUnspoiled(elfrida)\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) -> Specific(x))\nforall x (Specific(x) -> Snuggled(x))\n\nnot Specific(filippa)\n\nUnspoiled(filippa) and forall x (Unspoiled(x) -> Specific(x)) -> therefore Specific(filippa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Kira is epicarpal. Kira is wound. Kira is unknown. Debbra is metaphoric. Debbra is epicarpal. Debbra is palmy. Debbra is unhindered. Debbra is loco. Debbra is wound. Debbra is unknown. Bennie is metaphoric. Bennie is epicarpal. Bennie is palmy. Bennie is unhindered. Bennie is wound. All wound things are palmy. All palmy things are unhindered. Kira is unhindered.", "logic": "\nEpicarpal(kira)\nWound(kira)\nUnknown(kira)\nMetaphoric(debbra)\nEpicarpal(debbra)\nPalmy(debbra)\nUnhindered(debbra)\nLoco(debbra)\nWound(debbra)\nUnknown(debbra)\nMetaphoric(bennie)\nEpicarpal(bennie)\nPalmy(bennie)\nUnhindered(bennie)\nWound(bennie)\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Palmy(x))\nforall x (Palmy(x) -> Unhindered(x))\n\nUnhindered(kira)\n\nWound(kira) and forall x (Wound(x) -> Palmy(x)) -> therefore Palmy(kira) Palmy(kira) and forall x (Palmy(x) -> Unhindered(x)) -> therefore Unhindered(kira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Ertha is pale. Ertha is extra. Ertha is civic. Zaneta is encouraged. Zaneta is pale. Zaneta is lusterless. Zaneta is welcome. Zaneta is unratable. Zaneta is extra. Zaneta is civic. Storm is encouraged. Storm is pale. Storm is lusterless. Storm is welcome. Storm is extra. All extra things are lusterless. All lusterless things are welcome. Ertha is not welcome.", "logic": "\nPale(ertha)\nExtra(ertha)\nCivic(ertha)\nEncouraged(zaneta)\nPale(zaneta)\nLusterless(zaneta)\nWelcome(zaneta)\nUnratable(zaneta)\nExtra(zaneta)\nCivic(zaneta)\nEncouraged(storm)\nPale(storm)\nLusterless(storm)\nWelcome(storm)\nExtra(storm)\nforall x (Extra(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Welcome(x))\n\nnot Welcome(ertha)\n\nExtra(ertha) and forall x (Extra(x) -> Lusterless(x)) -> therefore Lusterless(ertha) Lusterless(ertha) and forall x (Lusterless(x) -> Welcome(x)) -> therefore Welcome(ertha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Cybal is adrenal. Cybal is decreasing. Cybal is unexpended. Lillis is ungraceful. Lillis is adrenal. Lillis is silky. Lillis is wise. Lillis is nether. Lillis is decreasing. Lillis is unexpended. Turner is ungraceful. Turner is adrenal. Turner is silky. Turner is wise. Turner is decreasing. All decreasing things are silky. All silky things are wise. Turner is not nether.", "logic": "\nAdrenal(cybal)\nDecreasing(cybal)\nUnexpended(cybal)\nUngraceful(lillis)\nAdrenal(lillis)\nSilky(lillis)\nWise(lillis)\nNether(lillis)\nDecreasing(lillis)\nUnexpended(lillis)\nUngraceful(turner)\nAdrenal(turner)\nSilky(turner)\nWise(turner)\nDecreasing(turner)\nforall x (Decreasing(x) -> Silky(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) -> Wise(x))\n\nnot Nether(turner)\n\nnot Nether(turner) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Blanch is crannied. Blanch is nauruan. Blanch is revered. Willamina is socialised. Willamina is crannied. Willamina is pyramidal. Willamina is granted. Willamina is mass. Willamina is nauruan. Willamina is revered. Gwenny is socialised. Gwenny is crannied. Gwenny is pyramidal. Gwenny is granted. Gwenny is nauruan. All nauruan things are pyramidal. All pyramidal things are granted. Blanch is socialised.", "logic": "\nCrannied(blanch)\nNauruan(blanch)\nRevered(blanch)\nSocialised(willamina)\nCrannied(willamina)\nPyramidal(willamina)\nGranted(willamina)\nMass(willamina)\nNauruan(willamina)\nRevered(willamina)\nSocialised(gwenny)\nCrannied(gwenny)\nPyramidal(gwenny)\nGranted(gwenny)\nNauruan(gwenny)\nforall x (Nauruan(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) -> Granted(x))\n\nSocialised(blanch)\n\nSocialised(blanch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Krissie is expansible. Krissie is neither. Krissie is perinatal. Kathye is metallic. Kathye is expansible. Kathye is anal. Kathye is bivalve. Kathye is capsular. Kathye is neither. Kathye is perinatal. Martie is metallic. Martie is expansible. Martie is anal. Martie is bivalve. Martie is neither. All neither things are anal. All anal things are bivalve. Martie is not perinatal.", "logic": "\nExpansible(krissie)\nNeither(krissie)\nPerinatal(krissie)\nMetallic(kathye)\nExpansible(kathye)\nAnal(kathye)\nBivalve(kathye)\nCapsular(kathye)\nNeither(kathye)\nPerinatal(kathye)\nMetallic(martie)\nExpansible(martie)\nAnal(martie)\nBivalve(martie)\nNeither(martie)\nforall x (Neither(x) -> Anal(x))\nforall x (Anal(x) -> Bivalve(x))\n\nnot Perinatal(martie)\n\nnot Perinatal(martie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "Harcourt is toasted. Harcourt is blaring. Harcourt is humourless. Star is euphonious. Star is toasted. Star is moroccan. Star is lovable. Star is amiable. Star is blaring. Star is humourless. Laverna is euphonious. Laverna is toasted. Laverna is moroccan. Laverna is lovable. Laverna is blaring. All blaring things are moroccan. All moroccan things are lovable. Harcourt is amiable.", "logic": "\nToasted(harcourt)\nBlaring(harcourt)\nHumourless(harcourt)\nEuphonious(star)\nToasted(star)\nMoroccan(star)\nLovable(star)\nAmiable(star)\nBlaring(star)\nHumourless(star)\nEuphonious(laverna)\nToasted(laverna)\nMoroccan(laverna)\nLovable(laverna)\nBlaring(laverna)\nforall x (Blaring(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Lovable(x))\n\nAmiable(harcourt)\n\nAmiable(harcourt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-916"} {"premises": "The theada articulate the noell. The theada articulate the nicky. The theada digitalise the nicky. The theada is enraged. The noell articulate the theada. The noell articulate the nicky. The noell does not eat the nicky. The noell is loyal. The noell is enraged. The noell is polar. The noell is not envisioned. The noell fodder the theada. The nicky digitalise the noell. The nicky is not tremendous. The nicky is polar. The nicky does not need the noell. If someone fodder the noell and they are polar then the noell digitalise the nicky. If the noell is polar then the noell fodder the nicky. If someone is loyal and they eat the nicky then the nicky does not eat the noell. If someone digitalise the noell then they need the nicky. If someone fodder the theada then the theada is enraged. If someone articulate the noell then they do not need the noell. If someone fodder the nicky then the nicky does not chase the theada. If someone fodder the nicky then they need the theada. The noell is loyal.", "logic": "\nArticulate(theada, noell)\nArticulate(theada, nicky)\nDigitalise(theada, nicky)\nEnraged(theada)\nArticulate(noell, theada)\nArticulate(noell, nicky)\nnot Digitalise(noell, nicky)\nLoyal(noell)\nEnraged(noell)\nPolar(noell)\nnot Envisioned(noell)\nFodder(noell, theada)\nDigitalise(nicky, noell)\nnot Tremendous(nicky)\nPolar(nicky)\nnot Fodder(nicky, noell)\nforall x (Fodder(x, noell) and Polar(x) -> Digitalise(noell, nicky))\nPolar(noell) -> Fodder(noell, nicky)\nforall x (Loyal(x) and Digitalise(x, nicky) -> not Digitalise(nicky, noell))\nforall x (Digitalise(x, noell) -> Fodder(x, nicky))\nforall x (Fodder(x, theada) -> Enraged(theada))\nforall x (Articulate(x, noell) -> not Fodder(x, noell))\nforall x (Fodder(x, nicky) -> not Articulate(nicky, theada))\nforall x (Fodder(x, nicky) -> Fodder(x, theada))\n\nLoyal(noell)\n\ntherefore Loyal(noell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The vinnie quench the aaron. The vinnie quench the collie. The vinnie overjoy the collie. The vinnie is sinister. The aaron quench the vinnie. The aaron quench the collie. The aaron does not eat the collie. The aaron is venerating. The aaron is sinister. The aaron is volant. The aaron is not pockmarked. The aaron libel the vinnie. The collie overjoy the aaron. The collie is not normal. The collie is volant. The collie does not need the aaron. If someone libel the aaron and they are volant then the aaron overjoy the collie. If the aaron is volant then the aaron libel the collie. If someone is venerating and they eat the collie then the collie does not eat the aaron. If someone overjoy the aaron then they need the collie. If someone libel the vinnie then the vinnie is sinister. If someone quench the aaron then they do not need the aaron. If someone libel the collie then the collie does not chase the vinnie. If someone libel the collie then they need the vinnie. The aaron does not chase the vinnie.", "logic": "\nQuench(vinnie, aaron)\nQuench(vinnie, collie)\nOverjoy(vinnie, collie)\nSinister(vinnie)\nQuench(aaron, vinnie)\nQuench(aaron, collie)\nnot Overjoy(aaron, collie)\nVenerating(aaron)\nSinister(aaron)\nVolant(aaron)\nnot Pockmarked(aaron)\nLibel(aaron, vinnie)\nOverjoy(collie, aaron)\nnot Normal(collie)\nVolant(collie)\nnot Libel(collie, aaron)\nforall x (Libel(x, aaron) and Volant(x) -> Overjoy(aaron, collie))\nVolant(aaron) -> Libel(aaron, collie)\nforall x (Venerating(x) and Overjoy(x, collie) -> not Overjoy(collie, aaron))\nforall x (Overjoy(x, aaron) -> Libel(x, collie))\nforall x (Libel(x, vinnie) -> Sinister(vinnie))\nforall x (Quench(x, aaron) -> not Libel(x, aaron))\nforall x (Libel(x, collie) -> not Quench(collie, vinnie))\nforall x (Libel(x, collie) -> Libel(x, vinnie))\n\nnot Quench(aaron, vinnie)\n\ntherefore Quench(aaron, vinnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The norrie elocute the hannibal. The norrie elocute the terri. The norrie anodize the terri. The norrie is tomentose. The hannibal elocute the norrie. The hannibal elocute the terri. The hannibal does not eat the terri. The hannibal is subduable. The hannibal is tomentose. The hannibal is weather. The hannibal is not radiating. The hannibal outbalance the norrie. The terri anodize the hannibal. The terri is not untied. The terri is weather. The terri does not need the hannibal. If someone outbalance the hannibal and they are weather then the hannibal anodize the terri. If the hannibal is weather then the hannibal outbalance the terri. If someone is subduable and they eat the terri then the terri does not eat the hannibal. If someone anodize the hannibal then they need the terri. If someone outbalance the norrie then the norrie is tomentose. If someone elocute the hannibal then they do not need the hannibal. If someone outbalance the terri then the terri does not chase the norrie. If someone outbalance the terri then they need the norrie. The terri outbalance the terri.", "logic": "\nElocute(norrie, hannibal)\nElocute(norrie, terri)\nAnodize(norrie, terri)\nTomentose(norrie)\nElocute(hannibal, norrie)\nElocute(hannibal, terri)\nnot Anodize(hannibal, terri)\nSubduable(hannibal)\nTomentose(hannibal)\nWeather(hannibal)\nnot Radiating(hannibal)\nOutbalance(hannibal, norrie)\nAnodize(terri, hannibal)\nnot Untied(terri)\nWeather(terri)\nnot Outbalance(terri, hannibal)\nforall x (Outbalance(x, hannibal) and Weather(x) -> Anodize(hannibal, terri))\nWeather(hannibal) -> Outbalance(hannibal, terri)\nforall x (Subduable(x) and Anodize(x, terri) -> not Anodize(terri, hannibal))\nforall x (Anodize(x, hannibal) -> Outbalance(x, terri))\nforall x (Outbalance(x, norrie) -> Tomentose(norrie))\nforall x (Elocute(x, hannibal) -> not Outbalance(x, hannibal))\nforall x (Outbalance(x, terri) -> not Elocute(terri, norrie))\nforall x (Outbalance(x, terri) -> Outbalance(x, norrie))\n\nOutbalance(terri, terri)\n\nAnodize(terri, hannibal) and forall x (Anodize(x, hannibal) -> Outbalance(x, terri)) -> therefore Outbalance(terri, terri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The adolf lipread the iona. The adolf lipread the marian. The adolf intrench the marian. The adolf is bisexual. The iona lipread the adolf. The iona lipread the marian. The iona does not eat the marian. The iona is manichaean. The iona is bisexual. The iona is shielded. The iona is not idiomatic. The iona plaster the adolf. The marian intrench the iona. The marian is not rusted. The marian is shielded. The marian does not need the iona. If someone plaster the iona and they are shielded then the iona intrench the marian. If the iona is shielded then the iona plaster the marian. If someone is manichaean and they eat the marian then the marian does not eat the iona. If someone intrench the iona then they need the marian. If someone plaster the adolf then the adolf is bisexual. If someone lipread the iona then they do not need the iona. If someone plaster the marian then the marian does not chase the adolf. If someone plaster the marian then they need the adolf. The iona does not need the marian.", "logic": "\nLipread(adolf, iona)\nLipread(adolf, marian)\nIntrench(adolf, marian)\nBisexual(adolf)\nLipread(iona, adolf)\nLipread(iona, marian)\nnot Intrench(iona, marian)\nManichaean(iona)\nBisexual(iona)\nShielded(iona)\nnot Idiomatic(iona)\nPlaster(iona, adolf)\nIntrench(marian, iona)\nnot Rusted(marian)\nShielded(marian)\nnot Plaster(marian, iona)\nforall x (Plaster(x, iona) and Shielded(x) -> Intrench(iona, marian))\nShielded(iona) -> Plaster(iona, marian)\nforall x (Manichaean(x) and Intrench(x, marian) -> not Intrench(marian, iona))\nforall x (Intrench(x, iona) -> Plaster(x, marian))\nforall x (Plaster(x, adolf) -> Bisexual(adolf))\nforall x (Lipread(x, iona) -> not Plaster(x, iona))\nforall x (Plaster(x, marian) -> not Lipread(marian, adolf))\nforall x (Plaster(x, marian) -> Plaster(x, adolf))\n\nnot Plaster(iona, marian)\n\nShielded(iona) and Shielded(iona) -> Plaster(iona, marian) -> therefore Plaster(iona, marian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The genevra monetize the pollyanna. The genevra monetize the sharona. The genevra secularize the sharona. The genevra is dutiable. The pollyanna monetize the genevra. The pollyanna monetize the sharona. The pollyanna does not eat the sharona. The pollyanna is indefinite. The pollyanna is dutiable. The pollyanna is foetid. The pollyanna is not flakey. The pollyanna quest the genevra. The sharona secularize the pollyanna. The sharona is not argent. The sharona is foetid. The sharona does not need the pollyanna. If someone quest the pollyanna and they are foetid then the pollyanna secularize the sharona. If the pollyanna is foetid then the pollyanna quest the sharona. If someone is indefinite and they eat the sharona then the sharona does not eat the pollyanna. If someone secularize the pollyanna then they need the sharona. If someone quest the genevra then the genevra is dutiable. If someone monetize the pollyanna then they do not need the pollyanna. If someone quest the sharona then the sharona does not chase the genevra. If someone quest the sharona then they need the genevra. The sharona quest the genevra.", "logic": "\nMonetize(genevra, pollyanna)\nMonetize(genevra, sharona)\nSecularize(genevra, sharona)\nDutiable(genevra)\nMonetize(pollyanna, genevra)\nMonetize(pollyanna, sharona)\nnot Secularize(pollyanna, sharona)\nIndefinite(pollyanna)\nDutiable(pollyanna)\nFoetid(pollyanna)\nnot Flakey(pollyanna)\nQuest(pollyanna, genevra)\nSecularize(sharona, pollyanna)\nnot Argent(sharona)\nFoetid(sharona)\nnot Quest(sharona, pollyanna)\nforall x (Quest(x, pollyanna) and Foetid(x) -> Secularize(pollyanna, sharona))\nFoetid(pollyanna) -> Quest(pollyanna, sharona)\nforall x (Indefinite(x) and Secularize(x, sharona) -> not Secularize(sharona, pollyanna))\nforall x (Secularize(x, pollyanna) -> Quest(x, sharona))\nforall x (Quest(x, genevra) -> Dutiable(genevra))\nforall x (Monetize(x, pollyanna) -> not Quest(x, pollyanna))\nforall x (Quest(x, sharona) -> not Monetize(sharona, genevra))\nforall x (Quest(x, sharona) -> Quest(x, genevra))\n\nQuest(sharona, genevra)\n\nSecularize(sharona, pollyanna) and forall x (Secularize(x, pollyanna) -> Quest(x, sharona)) -> therefore Quest(sharona, sharona) Quest(sharona, sharona) and forall x (Quest(x, sharona) -> Quest(x, genevra)) -> therefore Quest(sharona, genevra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The syd uncrate the alisun. The syd uncrate the muriel. The syd solo the muriel. The syd is undatable. The alisun uncrate the syd. The alisun uncrate the muriel. The alisun does not eat the muriel. The alisun is appetizing. The alisun is undatable. The alisun is brazen. The alisun is not eighteenth. The alisun unbolt the syd. The muriel solo the alisun. The muriel is not residuary. The muriel is brazen. The muriel does not need the alisun. If someone unbolt the alisun and they are brazen then the alisun solo the muriel. If the alisun is brazen then the alisun unbolt the muriel. If someone is appetizing and they eat the muriel then the muriel does not eat the alisun. If someone solo the alisun then they need the muriel. If someone unbolt the syd then the syd is undatable. If someone uncrate the alisun then they do not need the alisun. If someone unbolt the muriel then the muriel does not chase the syd. If someone unbolt the muriel then they need the syd. The muriel uncrate the syd.", "logic": "\nUncrate(syd, alisun)\nUncrate(syd, muriel)\nSolo(syd, muriel)\nUndatable(syd)\nUncrate(alisun, syd)\nUncrate(alisun, muriel)\nnot Solo(alisun, muriel)\nAppetizing(alisun)\nUndatable(alisun)\nBrazen(alisun)\nnot Eighteenth(alisun)\nUnbolt(alisun, syd)\nSolo(muriel, alisun)\nnot Residuary(muriel)\nBrazen(muriel)\nnot Unbolt(muriel, alisun)\nforall x (Unbolt(x, alisun) and Brazen(x) -> Solo(alisun, muriel))\nBrazen(alisun) -> Unbolt(alisun, muriel)\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and Solo(x, muriel) -> not Solo(muriel, alisun))\nforall x (Solo(x, alisun) -> Unbolt(x, muriel))\nforall x (Unbolt(x, syd) -> Undatable(syd))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, alisun) -> not Unbolt(x, alisun))\nforall x (Unbolt(x, muriel) -> not Uncrate(muriel, syd))\nforall x (Unbolt(x, muriel) -> Unbolt(x, syd))\n\nUncrate(muriel, syd)\n\nBrazen(alisun) and Brazen(alisun) -> Unbolt(alisun, muriel) -> therefore Unbolt(alisun, muriel) Unbolt(alisun, muriel) and forall x (Unbolt(x, muriel) -> not Uncrate(muriel, syd)) -> therefore not Uncrate(muriel, syd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The magna smother the nerita. The magna smother the petr. The magna discolour the petr. The magna is contralto. The nerita smother the magna. The nerita smother the petr. The nerita does not eat the petr. The nerita is splashy. The nerita is contralto. The nerita is susurrant. The nerita is not marbled. The nerita humbug the magna. The petr discolour the nerita. The petr is not cadent. The petr is susurrant. The petr does not need the nerita. If someone humbug the nerita and they are susurrant then the nerita discolour the petr. If the nerita is susurrant then the nerita humbug the petr. If someone is splashy and they eat the petr then the petr does not eat the nerita. If someone discolour the nerita then they need the petr. If someone humbug the magna then the magna is contralto. If someone smother the nerita then they do not need the nerita. If someone humbug the petr then the petr does not chase the magna. If someone humbug the petr then they need the magna. The magna does not need the petr.", "logic": "\nSmother(magna, nerita)\nSmother(magna, petr)\nDiscolour(magna, petr)\nContralto(magna)\nSmother(nerita, magna)\nSmother(nerita, petr)\nnot Discolour(nerita, petr)\nSplashy(nerita)\nContralto(nerita)\nSusurrant(nerita)\nnot Marbled(nerita)\nHumbug(nerita, magna)\nDiscolour(petr, nerita)\nnot Cadent(petr)\nSusurrant(petr)\nnot Humbug(petr, nerita)\nforall x (Humbug(x, nerita) and Susurrant(x) -> Discolour(nerita, petr))\nSusurrant(nerita) -> Humbug(nerita, petr)\nforall x (Splashy(x) and Discolour(x, petr) -> not Discolour(petr, nerita))\nforall x (Discolour(x, nerita) -> Humbug(x, petr))\nforall x (Humbug(x, magna) -> Contralto(magna))\nforall x (Smother(x, nerita) -> not Humbug(x, nerita))\nforall x (Humbug(x, petr) -> not Smother(petr, magna))\nforall x (Humbug(x, petr) -> Humbug(x, magna))\n\nnot Humbug(magna, petr)\n\nforall x (Discolour(x, nerita) -> Humbug(x, petr)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The malena avulse the appolonia. The malena avulse the gamaliel. The malena crispen the gamaliel. The malena is cleavable. The appolonia avulse the malena. The appolonia avulse the gamaliel. The appolonia does not eat the gamaliel. The appolonia is coarsened. The appolonia is cleavable. The appolonia is cavitied. The appolonia is not fleshly. The appolonia wrap the malena. The gamaliel crispen the appolonia. The gamaliel is not cutaneal. The gamaliel is cavitied. The gamaliel does not need the appolonia. If someone wrap the appolonia and they are cavitied then the appolonia crispen the gamaliel. If the appolonia is cavitied then the appolonia wrap the gamaliel. If someone is coarsened and they eat the gamaliel then the gamaliel does not eat the appolonia. If someone crispen the appolonia then they need the gamaliel. If someone wrap the malena then the malena is cleavable. If someone avulse the appolonia then they do not need the appolonia. If someone wrap the gamaliel then the gamaliel does not chase the malena. If someone wrap the gamaliel then they need the malena. The malena wrap the malena.", "logic": "\nAvulse(malena, appolonia)\nAvulse(malena, gamaliel)\nCrispen(malena, gamaliel)\nCleavable(malena)\nAvulse(appolonia, malena)\nAvulse(appolonia, gamaliel)\nnot Crispen(appolonia, gamaliel)\nCoarsened(appolonia)\nCleavable(appolonia)\nCavitied(appolonia)\nnot Fleshly(appolonia)\nWrap(appolonia, malena)\nCrispen(gamaliel, appolonia)\nnot Cutaneal(gamaliel)\nCavitied(gamaliel)\nnot Wrap(gamaliel, appolonia)\nforall x (Wrap(x, appolonia) and Cavitied(x) -> Crispen(appolonia, gamaliel))\nCavitied(appolonia) -> Wrap(appolonia, gamaliel)\nforall x (Coarsened(x) and Crispen(x, gamaliel) -> not Crispen(gamaliel, appolonia))\nforall x (Crispen(x, appolonia) -> Wrap(x, gamaliel))\nforall x (Wrap(x, malena) -> Cleavable(malena))\nforall x (Avulse(x, appolonia) -> not Wrap(x, appolonia))\nforall x (Wrap(x, gamaliel) -> not Avulse(gamaliel, malena))\nforall x (Wrap(x, gamaliel) -> Wrap(x, malena))\n\nWrap(malena, malena)\n\nforall x (Wrap(x, gamaliel) -> Wrap(x, malena)) <- forall x (Crispen(x, appolonia) -> Wrap(x, gamaliel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The wenda atomise the donella. The wenda atomise the sibbie. The wenda humour the sibbie. The wenda is dynastic. The donella atomise the wenda. The donella atomise the sibbie. The donella does not eat the sibbie. The donella is armed. The donella is dynastic. The donella is aqueous. The donella is not implicated. The donella fledge the wenda. The sibbie humour the donella. The sibbie is not boneless. The sibbie is aqueous. The sibbie does not need the donella. If someone fledge the donella and they are aqueous then the donella humour the sibbie. If the donella is aqueous then the donella fledge the sibbie. If someone is armed and they eat the sibbie then the sibbie does not eat the donella. If someone humour the donella then they need the sibbie. If someone fledge the wenda then the wenda is dynastic. If someone atomise the donella then they do not need the donella. If someone fledge the sibbie then the sibbie does not chase the wenda. If someone fledge the sibbie then they need the wenda. The sibbie does not chase the sibbie.", "logic": "\nAtomise(wenda, donella)\nAtomise(wenda, sibbie)\nHumour(wenda, sibbie)\nDynastic(wenda)\nAtomise(donella, wenda)\nAtomise(donella, sibbie)\nnot Humour(donella, sibbie)\nArmed(donella)\nDynastic(donella)\nAqueous(donella)\nnot Implicated(donella)\nFledge(donella, wenda)\nHumour(sibbie, donella)\nnot Boneless(sibbie)\nAqueous(sibbie)\nnot Fledge(sibbie, donella)\nforall x (Fledge(x, donella) and Aqueous(x) -> Humour(donella, sibbie))\nAqueous(donella) -> Fledge(donella, sibbie)\nforall x (Armed(x) and Humour(x, sibbie) -> not Humour(sibbie, donella))\nforall x (Humour(x, donella) -> Fledge(x, sibbie))\nforall x (Fledge(x, wenda) -> Dynastic(wenda))\nforall x (Atomise(x, donella) -> not Fledge(x, donella))\nforall x (Fledge(x, sibbie) -> not Atomise(sibbie, wenda))\nforall x (Fledge(x, sibbie) -> Fledge(x, wenda))\n\nnot Atomise(sibbie, sibbie)\n\nnot Atomise(sibbie, sibbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The alyse aurify the goldi. The alyse aurify the fredrika. The alyse bulletin the fredrika. The alyse is fibreoptic. The goldi aurify the alyse. The goldi aurify the fredrika. The goldi does not eat the fredrika. The goldi is canonized. The goldi is fibreoptic. The goldi is synoptical. The goldi is not unsocial. The goldi firebomb the alyse. The fredrika bulletin the goldi. The fredrika is not subjective. The fredrika is synoptical. The fredrika does not need the goldi. If someone firebomb the goldi and they are synoptical then the goldi bulletin the fredrika. If the goldi is synoptical then the goldi firebomb the fredrika. If someone is canonized and they eat the fredrika then the fredrika does not eat the goldi. If someone bulletin the goldi then they need the fredrika. If someone firebomb the alyse then the alyse is fibreoptic. If someone aurify the goldi then they do not need the goldi. If someone firebomb the fredrika then the fredrika does not chase the alyse. If someone firebomb the fredrika then they need the alyse. The alyse is synoptical.", "logic": "\nAurify(alyse, goldi)\nAurify(alyse, fredrika)\nBulletin(alyse, fredrika)\nFibreoptic(alyse)\nAurify(goldi, alyse)\nAurify(goldi, fredrika)\nnot Bulletin(goldi, fredrika)\nCanonized(goldi)\nFibreoptic(goldi)\nSynoptical(goldi)\nnot Unsocial(goldi)\nFirebomb(goldi, alyse)\nBulletin(fredrika, goldi)\nnot Subjective(fredrika)\nSynoptical(fredrika)\nnot Firebomb(fredrika, goldi)\nforall x (Firebomb(x, goldi) and Synoptical(x) -> Bulletin(goldi, fredrika))\nSynoptical(goldi) -> Firebomb(goldi, fredrika)\nforall x (Canonized(x) and Bulletin(x, fredrika) -> not Bulletin(fredrika, goldi))\nforall x (Bulletin(x, goldi) -> Firebomb(x, fredrika))\nforall x (Firebomb(x, alyse) -> Fibreoptic(alyse))\nforall x (Aurify(x, goldi) -> not Firebomb(x, goldi))\nforall x (Firebomb(x, fredrika) -> not Aurify(fredrika, alyse))\nforall x (Firebomb(x, fredrika) -> Firebomb(x, alyse))\n\nSynoptical(alyse)\n\nSynoptical(alyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The vail mandate the abdel. The vail mandate the frank. The vail paragraph the frank. The vail is bedless. The abdel mandate the vail. The abdel mandate the frank. The abdel does not eat the frank. The abdel is glistening. The abdel is bedless. The abdel is corrugated. The abdel is not disdainful. The abdel reeve the vail. The frank paragraph the abdel. The frank is not stung. The frank is corrugated. The frank does not need the abdel. If someone reeve the abdel and they are corrugated then the abdel paragraph the frank. If the abdel is corrugated then the abdel reeve the frank. If someone is glistening and they eat the frank then the frank does not eat the abdel. If someone paragraph the abdel then they need the frank. If someone reeve the vail then the vail is bedless. If someone mandate the abdel then they do not need the abdel. If someone reeve the frank then the frank does not chase the vail. If someone reeve the frank then they need the vail. The abdel does not eat the vail.", "logic": "\nMandate(vail, abdel)\nMandate(vail, frank)\nParagraph(vail, frank)\nBedless(vail)\nMandate(abdel, vail)\nMandate(abdel, frank)\nnot Paragraph(abdel, frank)\nGlistening(abdel)\nBedless(abdel)\nCorrugated(abdel)\nnot Disdainful(abdel)\nReeve(abdel, vail)\nParagraph(frank, abdel)\nnot Stung(frank)\nCorrugated(frank)\nnot Reeve(frank, abdel)\nforall x (Reeve(x, abdel) and Corrugated(x) -> Paragraph(abdel, frank))\nCorrugated(abdel) -> Reeve(abdel, frank)\nforall x (Glistening(x) and Paragraph(x, frank) -> not Paragraph(frank, abdel))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, abdel) -> Reeve(x, frank))\nforall x (Reeve(x, vail) -> Bedless(vail))\nforall x (Mandate(x, abdel) -> not Reeve(x, abdel))\nforall x (Reeve(x, frank) -> not Mandate(frank, vail))\nforall x (Reeve(x, frank) -> Reeve(x, vail))\n\nnot Paragraph(abdel, vail)\n\nnot Paragraph(abdel, vail) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "The toddy regulate the concordia. The toddy regulate the katleen. The toddy bore the katleen. The toddy is permed. The concordia regulate the toddy. The concordia regulate the katleen. The concordia does not eat the katleen. The concordia is goethian. The concordia is permed. The concordia is homing. The concordia is not guided. The concordia relay the toddy. The katleen bore the concordia. The katleen is not vermillion. The katleen is homing. The katleen does not need the concordia. If someone relay the concordia and they are homing then the concordia bore the katleen. If the concordia is homing then the concordia relay the katleen. If someone is goethian and they eat the katleen then the katleen does not eat the concordia. If someone bore the concordia then they need the katleen. If someone relay the toddy then the toddy is permed. If someone regulate the concordia then they do not need the concordia. If someone relay the katleen then the katleen does not chase the toddy. If someone relay the katleen then they need the toddy. The toddy is guided.", "logic": "\nRegulate(toddy, concordia)\nRegulate(toddy, katleen)\nBore(toddy, katleen)\nPermed(toddy)\nRegulate(concordia, toddy)\nRegulate(concordia, katleen)\nnot Bore(concordia, katleen)\nGoethian(concordia)\nPermed(concordia)\nHoming(concordia)\nnot Guided(concordia)\nRelay(concordia, toddy)\nBore(katleen, concordia)\nnot Vermillion(katleen)\nHoming(katleen)\nnot Relay(katleen, concordia)\nforall x (Relay(x, concordia) and Homing(x) -> Bore(concordia, katleen))\nHoming(concordia) -> Relay(concordia, katleen)\nforall x (Goethian(x) and Bore(x, katleen) -> not Bore(katleen, concordia))\nforall x (Bore(x, concordia) -> Relay(x, katleen))\nforall x (Relay(x, toddy) -> Permed(toddy))\nforall x (Regulate(x, concordia) -> not Relay(x, concordia))\nforall x (Relay(x, katleen) -> not Regulate(katleen, toddy))\nforall x (Relay(x, katleen) -> Relay(x, toddy))\n\nGuided(toddy)\n\nGuided(toddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-66"} {"premises": "Kevan is azoic. Kevan is flexile. Kevan is damning. Davey is azoic. Davey is cryogenic. Davey is flexile. Davey is landscaped. If someone is damning then they are not auditive. If Davey is flexile then Davey is not exclusive. If someone is landscaped then they are damning. If someone is cryogenic then they are flexile. If someone is auditive and exclusive then they are cryogenic. If someone is landscaped and not exclusive then they are azoic. Davey is landscaped.", "logic": "\nAzoic(kevan)\nFlexile(kevan)\nDamning(kevan)\nAzoic(davey)\nCryogenic(davey)\nFlexile(davey)\nLandscaped(davey)\nforall x (Damning(x) -> not Auditive(x))\nFlexile(davey) -> not Exclusive(davey)\nforall x (Landscaped(x) -> Damning(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Auditive(x) and Exclusive(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\nforall x (Landscaped(x) and not Exclusive(x) -> Azoic(x))\n\nLandscaped(davey)\n\ntherefore Landscaped(davey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Hedda is associable. Hedda is fumed. Hedda is bonnie. Leroy is associable. Leroy is largish. Leroy is fumed. Leroy is treasured. If someone is bonnie then they are not toxicant. If Leroy is fumed then Leroy is not lenient. If someone is treasured then they are bonnie. If someone is largish then they are fumed. If someone is toxicant and lenient then they are largish. If someone is treasured and not lenient then they are associable. Hedda is not associable.", "logic": "\nAssociable(hedda)\nFumed(hedda)\nBonnie(hedda)\nAssociable(leroy)\nLargish(leroy)\nFumed(leroy)\nTreasured(leroy)\nforall x (Bonnie(x) -> not Toxicant(x))\nFumed(leroy) -> not Lenient(leroy)\nforall x (Treasured(x) -> Bonnie(x))\nforall x (Largish(x) -> Fumed(x))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) and Lenient(x) -> Largish(x))\nforall x (Treasured(x) and not Lenient(x) -> Associable(x))\n\nnot Associable(hedda)\n\ntherefore Associable(hedda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Selinda is reigning. Selinda is toned. Selinda is saxicoline. Odell is reigning. Odell is illusional. Odell is toned. Odell is wiry. If someone is saxicoline then they are not ominous. If Odell is toned then Odell is not clubbable. If someone is wiry then they are saxicoline. If someone is illusional then they are toned. If someone is ominous and clubbable then they are illusional. If someone is wiry and not clubbable then they are reigning. Odell is not clubbable.", "logic": "\nReigning(selinda)\nToned(selinda)\nSaxicoline(selinda)\nReigning(odell)\nIllusional(odell)\nToned(odell)\nWiry(odell)\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> not Ominous(x))\nToned(odell) -> not Clubbable(odell)\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nforall x (Illusional(x) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Clubbable(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Wiry(x) and not Clubbable(x) -> Reigning(x))\n\nnot Clubbable(odell)\n\nToned(odell) and Toned(odell) -> not Clubbable(odell) -> therefore not Clubbable(odell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Alfonse is secure. Alfonse is thickening. Alfonse is impish. Antonie is secure. Antonie is overmuch. Antonie is thickening. Antonie is artistic. If someone is impish then they are not nonmusical. If Antonie is thickening then Antonie is not unfounded. If someone is artistic then they are impish. If someone is overmuch then they are thickening. If someone is nonmusical and unfounded then they are overmuch. If someone is artistic and not unfounded then they are secure. Antonie is unfounded.", "logic": "\nSecure(alfonse)\nThickening(alfonse)\nImpish(alfonse)\nSecure(antonie)\nOvermuch(antonie)\nThickening(antonie)\nArtistic(antonie)\nforall x (Impish(x) -> not Nonmusical(x))\nThickening(antonie) -> not Unfounded(antonie)\nforall x (Artistic(x) -> Impish(x))\nforall x (Overmuch(x) -> Thickening(x))\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) and Unfounded(x) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Artistic(x) and not Unfounded(x) -> Secure(x))\n\nUnfounded(antonie)\n\nThickening(antonie) and Thickening(antonie) -> not Unfounded(antonie) -> therefore not Unfounded(antonie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Thorn is androgenic. Thorn is mere. Thorn is baffling. Sophie is androgenic. Sophie is tenuous. Sophie is mere. Sophie is finical. If someone is baffling then they are not captivated. If Sophie is mere then Sophie is not coriaceous. If someone is finical then they are baffling. If someone is tenuous then they are mere. If someone is captivated and coriaceous then they are tenuous. If someone is finical and not coriaceous then they are androgenic. Sophie is not captivated.", "logic": "\nAndrogenic(thorn)\nMere(thorn)\nBaffling(thorn)\nAndrogenic(sophie)\nTenuous(sophie)\nMere(sophie)\nFinical(sophie)\nforall x (Baffling(x) -> not Captivated(x))\nMere(sophie) -> not Coriaceous(sophie)\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Baffling(x))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Mere(x))\nforall x (Captivated(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Tenuous(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) and not Coriaceous(x) -> Androgenic(x))\n\nnot Captivated(sophie)\n\nFinical(sophie) and forall x (Finical(x) -> Baffling(x)) -> therefore Baffling(sophie) Baffling(sophie) and forall x (Baffling(x) -> not Captivated(x)) -> therefore not Captivated(sophie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Sloane is following. Sloane is dighted. Sloane is mutant. Christos is following. Christos is diabatic. Christos is dighted. Christos is concluding. If someone is mutant then they are not lavish. If Christos is dighted then Christos is not hardened. If someone is concluding then they are mutant. If someone is diabatic then they are dighted. If someone is lavish and hardened then they are diabatic. If someone is concluding and not hardened then they are following. Christos is lavish.", "logic": "\nFollowing(sloane)\nDighted(sloane)\nMutant(sloane)\nFollowing(christos)\nDiabatic(christos)\nDighted(christos)\nConcluding(christos)\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> not Lavish(x))\nDighted(christos) -> not Hardened(christos)\nforall x (Concluding(x) -> Mutant(x))\nforall x (Diabatic(x) -> Dighted(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x) and Hardened(x) -> Diabatic(x))\nforall x (Concluding(x) and not Hardened(x) -> Following(x))\n\nLavish(christos)\n\nConcluding(christos) and forall x (Concluding(x) -> Mutant(x)) -> therefore Mutant(christos) Mutant(christos) and forall x (Mutant(x) -> not Lavish(x)) -> therefore not Lavish(christos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Mitchel is jubilant. Mitchel is plus. Mitchel is randy. Nanci is jubilant. Nanci is sensuous. Nanci is plus. Nanci is scopal. If someone is randy then they are not treble. If Nanci is plus then Nanci is not zymolytic. If someone is scopal then they are randy. If someone is sensuous then they are plus. If someone is treble and zymolytic then they are sensuous. If someone is scopal and not zymolytic then they are jubilant. Mitchel is not sensuous.", "logic": "\nJubilant(mitchel)\nPlus(mitchel)\nRandy(mitchel)\nJubilant(nanci)\nSensuous(nanci)\nPlus(nanci)\nScopal(nanci)\nforall x (Randy(x) -> not Treble(x))\nPlus(nanci) -> not Zymolytic(nanci)\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> Randy(x))\nforall x (Sensuous(x) -> Plus(x))\nforall x (Treble(x) and Zymolytic(x) -> Sensuous(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) and not Zymolytic(x) -> Jubilant(x))\n\nnot Sensuous(mitchel)\n\nforall x (Treble(x) and Zymolytic(x) -> Sensuous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Genevieve is smothering. Genevieve is unrepaired. Genevieve is benighted. Myrta is smothering. Myrta is colour. Myrta is unrepaired. Myrta is ignitable. If someone is benighted then they are not nicaraguan. If Myrta is unrepaired then Myrta is not hobnailed. If someone is ignitable then they are benighted. If someone is colour then they are unrepaired. If someone is nicaraguan and hobnailed then they are colour. If someone is ignitable and not hobnailed then they are smothering. Genevieve is ignitable.", "logic": "\nSmothering(genevieve)\nUnrepaired(genevieve)\nBenighted(genevieve)\nSmothering(myrta)\nColour(myrta)\nUnrepaired(myrta)\nIgnitable(myrta)\nforall x (Benighted(x) -> not Nicaraguan(x))\nUnrepaired(myrta) -> not Hobnailed(myrta)\nforall x (Ignitable(x) -> Benighted(x))\nforall x (Colour(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) and Hobnailed(x) -> Colour(x))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and not Hobnailed(x) -> Smothering(x))\n\nIgnitable(genevieve)\n\nIgnitable(genevieve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The isabelle secern the farand. The isabelle secern the luana. The isabelle is unwitting. The donald secern the luana. The donald is semisoft. The donald muddy the isabelle. The farand secern the isabelle. The farand is tractive. The farand is unwitting. The farand is semisoft. The farand muddy the isabelle. The farand roof the isabelle. The luana secern the farand. The luana muddy the farand. The luana roof the isabelle. If someone roof the luana and they chase the isabelle then the luana muddy the isabelle. All tractive people are polytonal. If someone muddy the farand then they are unwitting. If someone is slurred then they like the farand. If someone muddy the luana then the luana is slurred. If someone muddy the luana then they need the luana. If someone is tractive and polytonal then they are slurred. If someone secern the isabelle then they are semisoft. The donald secern the luana.", "logic": "\nSecern(isabelle, farand)\nSecern(isabelle, luana)\nUnwitting(isabelle)\nSecern(donald, luana)\nSemisoft(donald)\nMuddy(donald, isabelle)\nSecern(farand, isabelle)\nTractive(farand)\nUnwitting(farand)\nSemisoft(farand)\nMuddy(farand, isabelle)\nRoof(farand, isabelle)\nSecern(luana, farand)\nMuddy(luana, farand)\nRoof(luana, isabelle)\nforall x (Roof(x, luana) and Secern(x, isabelle) -> Muddy(luana, isabelle))\nforall x (Tractive(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Muddy(x, farand) -> Unwitting(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Muddy(x, farand))\nforall x (Muddy(x, luana) -> Slurred(luana))\nforall x (Muddy(x, luana) -> Roof(x, luana))\nforall x (Tractive(x) and Polytonal(x) -> Slurred(x))\nforall x (Secern(x, isabelle) -> Semisoft(x))\n\nSecern(donald, luana)\n\ntherefore Secern(donald, luana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The aurora invert the benn. The aurora invert the nanice. The aurora is disguised. The daisi invert the nanice. The daisi is paleozoic. The daisi treadle the aurora. The benn invert the aurora. The benn is laboured. The benn is disguised. The benn is paleozoic. The benn treadle the aurora. The benn epoxy the aurora. The nanice invert the benn. The nanice treadle the benn. The nanice epoxy the aurora. If someone epoxy the nanice and they chase the aurora then the nanice treadle the aurora. All laboured people are expositive. If someone treadle the benn then they are disguised. If someone is cragfast then they like the benn. If someone treadle the nanice then the nanice is cragfast. If someone treadle the nanice then they need the nanice. If someone is laboured and expositive then they are cragfast. If someone invert the aurora then they are paleozoic. The aurora is not disguised.", "logic": "\nInvert(aurora, benn)\nInvert(aurora, nanice)\nDisguised(aurora)\nInvert(daisi, nanice)\nPaleozoic(daisi)\nTreadle(daisi, aurora)\nInvert(benn, aurora)\nLaboured(benn)\nDisguised(benn)\nPaleozoic(benn)\nTreadle(benn, aurora)\nEpoxy(benn, aurora)\nInvert(nanice, benn)\nTreadle(nanice, benn)\nEpoxy(nanice, aurora)\nforall x (Epoxy(x, nanice) and Invert(x, aurora) -> Treadle(nanice, aurora))\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> Expositive(x))\nforall x (Treadle(x, benn) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Cragfast(x) -> Treadle(x, benn))\nforall x (Treadle(x, nanice) -> Cragfast(nanice))\nforall x (Treadle(x, nanice) -> Epoxy(x, nanice))\nforall x (Laboured(x) and Expositive(x) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Invert(x, aurora) -> Paleozoic(x))\n\nnot Disguised(aurora)\n\ntherefore Disguised(aurora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The adrianne neighbor the horacio. The adrianne neighbor the carmina. The adrianne is unframed. The clarinda neighbor the carmina. The clarinda is genovese. The clarinda shepherd the adrianne. The horacio neighbor the adrianne. The horacio is highbrow. The horacio is unframed. The horacio is genovese. The horacio shepherd the adrianne. The horacio drone the adrianne. The carmina neighbor the horacio. The carmina shepherd the horacio. The carmina drone the adrianne. If someone drone the carmina and they chase the adrianne then the carmina shepherd the adrianne. All highbrow people are fireproof. If someone shepherd the horacio then they are unframed. If someone is unwished then they like the horacio. If someone shepherd the carmina then the carmina is unwished. If someone shepherd the carmina then they need the carmina. If someone is highbrow and fireproof then they are unwished. If someone neighbor the adrianne then they are genovese. The carmina is unframed.", "logic": "\nNeighbor(adrianne, horacio)\nNeighbor(adrianne, carmina)\nUnframed(adrianne)\nNeighbor(clarinda, carmina)\nGenovese(clarinda)\nShepherd(clarinda, adrianne)\nNeighbor(horacio, adrianne)\nHighbrow(horacio)\nUnframed(horacio)\nGenovese(horacio)\nShepherd(horacio, adrianne)\nDrone(horacio, adrianne)\nNeighbor(carmina, horacio)\nShepherd(carmina, horacio)\nDrone(carmina, adrianne)\nforall x (Drone(x, carmina) and Neighbor(x, adrianne) -> Shepherd(carmina, adrianne))\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Fireproof(x))\nforall x (Shepherd(x, horacio) -> Unframed(x))\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> Shepherd(x, horacio))\nforall x (Shepherd(x, carmina) -> Unwished(carmina))\nforall x (Shepherd(x, carmina) -> Drone(x, carmina))\nforall x (Highbrow(x) and Fireproof(x) -> Unwished(x))\nforall x (Neighbor(x, adrianne) -> Genovese(x))\n\nUnframed(carmina)\n\nShepherd(carmina, horacio) and forall x (Shepherd(x, horacio) -> Unframed(x)) -> therefore Unframed(carmina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The bart untwine the aura. The bart untwine the dulcine. The bart is apostate. The franni untwine the dulcine. The franni is traitorous. The franni hiss the bart. The aura untwine the bart. The aura is descendent. The aura is apostate. The aura is traitorous. The aura hiss the bart. The aura quake the bart. The dulcine untwine the aura. The dulcine hiss the aura. The dulcine quake the bart. If someone quake the dulcine and they chase the bart then the dulcine hiss the bart. All descendent people are mute. If someone hiss the aura then they are apostate. If someone is african then they like the aura. If someone hiss the dulcine then the dulcine is african. If someone hiss the dulcine then they need the dulcine. If someone is descendent and mute then they are african. If someone untwine the bart then they are traitorous. The dulcine is not apostate.", "logic": "\nUntwine(bart, aura)\nUntwine(bart, dulcine)\nApostate(bart)\nUntwine(franni, dulcine)\nTraitorous(franni)\nHiss(franni, bart)\nUntwine(aura, bart)\nDescendent(aura)\nApostate(aura)\nTraitorous(aura)\nHiss(aura, bart)\nQuake(aura, bart)\nUntwine(dulcine, aura)\nHiss(dulcine, aura)\nQuake(dulcine, bart)\nforall x (Quake(x, dulcine) and Untwine(x, bart) -> Hiss(dulcine, bart))\nforall x (Descendent(x) -> Mute(x))\nforall x (Hiss(x, aura) -> Apostate(x))\nforall x (African(x) -> Hiss(x, aura))\nforall x (Hiss(x, dulcine) -> African(dulcine))\nforall x (Hiss(x, dulcine) -> Quake(x, dulcine))\nforall x (Descendent(x) and Mute(x) -> African(x))\nforall x (Untwine(x, bart) -> Traitorous(x))\n\nnot Apostate(dulcine)\n\nHiss(dulcine, aura) and forall x (Hiss(x, aura) -> Apostate(x)) -> therefore Apostate(dulcine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The carmelle railroad the laurance. The carmelle railroad the christof. The carmelle is boneheaded. The britt railroad the christof. The britt is bitter. The britt gibbet the carmelle. The laurance railroad the carmelle. The laurance is bulbous. The laurance is boneheaded. The laurance is bitter. The laurance gibbet the carmelle. The laurance incommode the carmelle. The christof railroad the laurance. The christof gibbet the laurance. The christof incommode the carmelle. If someone incommode the christof and they chase the carmelle then the christof gibbet the carmelle. All bulbous people are autarkical. If someone gibbet the laurance then they are boneheaded. If someone is bimanual then they like the laurance. If someone gibbet the christof then the christof is bimanual. If someone gibbet the christof then they need the christof. If someone is bulbous and autarkical then they are bimanual. If someone railroad the carmelle then they are bitter. The laurance is bimanual.", "logic": "\nRailroad(carmelle, laurance)\nRailroad(carmelle, christof)\nBoneheaded(carmelle)\nRailroad(britt, christof)\nBitter(britt)\nGibbet(britt, carmelle)\nRailroad(laurance, carmelle)\nBulbous(laurance)\nBoneheaded(laurance)\nBitter(laurance)\nGibbet(laurance, carmelle)\nIncommode(laurance, carmelle)\nRailroad(christof, laurance)\nGibbet(christof, laurance)\nIncommode(christof, carmelle)\nforall x (Incommode(x, christof) and Railroad(x, carmelle) -> Gibbet(christof, carmelle))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) -> Autarkical(x))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, laurance) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Bimanual(x) -> Gibbet(x, laurance))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, christof) -> Bimanual(christof))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, christof) -> Incommode(x, christof))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) and Autarkical(x) -> Bimanual(x))\nforall x (Railroad(x, carmelle) -> Bitter(x))\n\nBimanual(laurance)\n\nBulbous(laurance) and forall x (Bulbous(x) -> Autarkical(x)) -> therefore Autarkical(laurance) Bulbous(laurance) and Autarkical(laurance) and forall x (Bulbous(x) and Autarkical(x) -> Bimanual(x)) -> therefore Bimanual(laurance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The fanya exposit the richmond. The fanya exposit the evonne. The fanya is vulcanized. The nicoli exposit the evonne. The nicoli is axial. The nicoli dismount the fanya. The richmond exposit the fanya. The richmond is ongoing. The richmond is vulcanized. The richmond is axial. The richmond dismount the fanya. The richmond make the fanya. The evonne exposit the richmond. The evonne dismount the richmond. The evonne make the fanya. If someone make the evonne and they chase the fanya then the evonne dismount the fanya. All ongoing people are troubled. If someone dismount the richmond then they are vulcanized. If someone is healing then they like the richmond. If someone dismount the evonne then the evonne is healing. If someone dismount the evonne then they need the evonne. If someone is ongoing and troubled then they are healing. If someone exposit the fanya then they are axial. The richmond is not healing.", "logic": "\nExposit(fanya, richmond)\nExposit(fanya, evonne)\nVulcanized(fanya)\nExposit(nicoli, evonne)\nAxial(nicoli)\nDismount(nicoli, fanya)\nExposit(richmond, fanya)\nOngoing(richmond)\nVulcanized(richmond)\nAxial(richmond)\nDismount(richmond, fanya)\nMake(richmond, fanya)\nExposit(evonne, richmond)\nDismount(evonne, richmond)\nMake(evonne, fanya)\nforall x (Make(x, evonne) and Exposit(x, fanya) -> Dismount(evonne, fanya))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Troubled(x))\nforall x (Dismount(x, richmond) -> Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Healing(x) -> Dismount(x, richmond))\nforall x (Dismount(x, evonne) -> Healing(evonne))\nforall x (Dismount(x, evonne) -> Make(x, evonne))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) and Troubled(x) -> Healing(x))\nforall x (Exposit(x, fanya) -> Axial(x))\n\nnot Healing(richmond)\n\nOngoing(richmond) and forall x (Ongoing(x) -> Troubled(x)) -> therefore Troubled(richmond) Ongoing(richmond) and Troubled(richmond) and forall x (Ongoing(x) and Troubled(x) -> Healing(x)) -> therefore Healing(richmond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The mavis lustrate the esteban. The mavis lustrate the mikako. The mavis is compelling. The dion lustrate the mikako. The dion is sinister. The dion objurgate the mavis. The esteban lustrate the mavis. The esteban is hypotonic. The esteban is compelling. The esteban is sinister. The esteban objurgate the mavis. The esteban tweedle the mavis. The mikako lustrate the esteban. The mikako objurgate the esteban. The mikako tweedle the mavis. If someone tweedle the mikako and they chase the mavis then the mikako objurgate the mavis. All hypotonic people are resolved. If someone objurgate the esteban then they are compelling. If someone is unique then they like the esteban. If someone objurgate the mikako then the mikako is unique. If someone objurgate the mikako then they need the mikako. If someone is hypotonic and resolved then they are unique. If someone lustrate the mavis then they are sinister. The mavis does not need the mikako.", "logic": "\nLustrate(mavis, esteban)\nLustrate(mavis, mikako)\nCompelling(mavis)\nLustrate(dion, mikako)\nSinister(dion)\nObjurgate(dion, mavis)\nLustrate(esteban, mavis)\nHypotonic(esteban)\nCompelling(esteban)\nSinister(esteban)\nObjurgate(esteban, mavis)\nTweedle(esteban, mavis)\nLustrate(mikako, esteban)\nObjurgate(mikako, esteban)\nTweedle(mikako, mavis)\nforall x (Tweedle(x, mikako) and Lustrate(x, mavis) -> Objurgate(mikako, mavis))\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) -> Resolved(x))\nforall x (Objurgate(x, esteban) -> Compelling(x))\nforall x (Unique(x) -> Objurgate(x, esteban))\nforall x (Objurgate(x, mikako) -> Unique(mikako))\nforall x (Objurgate(x, mikako) -> Tweedle(x, mikako))\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) and Resolved(x) -> Unique(x))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, mavis) -> Sinister(x))\n\nnot Tweedle(mavis, mikako)\n\nforall x (Objurgate(x, mikako) -> Tweedle(x, mikako)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The felicdad proctor the fidelia. The felicdad proctor the elena. The felicdad is meaning. The titos proctor the elena. The titos is ripping. The titos enquire the felicdad. The fidelia proctor the felicdad. The fidelia is pareve. The fidelia is meaning. The fidelia is ripping. The fidelia enquire the felicdad. The fidelia behead the felicdad. The elena proctor the fidelia. The elena enquire the fidelia. The elena behead the felicdad. If someone behead the elena and they chase the felicdad then the elena enquire the felicdad. All pareve people are auld. If someone enquire the fidelia then they are meaning. If someone is chelated then they like the fidelia. If someone enquire the elena then the elena is chelated. If someone enquire the elena then they need the elena. If someone is pareve and auld then they are chelated. If someone proctor the felicdad then they are ripping. The titos is meaning.", "logic": "\nProctor(felicdad, fidelia)\nProctor(felicdad, elena)\nMeaning(felicdad)\nProctor(titos, elena)\nRipping(titos)\nEnquire(titos, felicdad)\nProctor(fidelia, felicdad)\nPareve(fidelia)\nMeaning(fidelia)\nRipping(fidelia)\nEnquire(fidelia, felicdad)\nBehead(fidelia, felicdad)\nProctor(elena, fidelia)\nEnquire(elena, fidelia)\nBehead(elena, felicdad)\nforall x (Behead(x, elena) and Proctor(x, felicdad) -> Enquire(elena, felicdad))\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Auld(x))\nforall x (Enquire(x, fidelia) -> Meaning(x))\nforall x (Chelated(x) -> Enquire(x, fidelia))\nforall x (Enquire(x, elena) -> Chelated(elena))\nforall x (Enquire(x, elena) -> Behead(x, elena))\nforall x (Pareve(x) and Auld(x) -> Chelated(x))\nforall x (Proctor(x, felicdad) -> Ripping(x))\n\nMeaning(titos)\n\nforall x (Enquire(x, fidelia) -> Meaning(x)) <- forall x (Chelated(x) -> Enquire(x, fidelia)) <- forall x (Pareve(x) and Auld(x) -> Chelated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The deeanne interbreed the betta. The deeanne interbreed the blake. The deeanne is mesmeric. The jacquelin interbreed the blake. The jacquelin is reddish. The jacquelin absent the deeanne. The betta interbreed the deeanne. The betta is speedy. The betta is mesmeric. The betta is reddish. The betta absent the deeanne. The betta pall the deeanne. The blake interbreed the betta. The blake absent the betta. The blake pall the deeanne. If someone pall the blake and they chase the deeanne then the blake absent the deeanne. All speedy people are downlike. If someone absent the betta then they are mesmeric. If someone is federal then they like the betta. If someone absent the blake then the blake is federal. If someone absent the blake then they need the blake. If someone is speedy and downlike then they are federal. If someone interbreed the deeanne then they are reddish. The betta does not need the blake.", "logic": "\nInterbreed(deeanne, betta)\nInterbreed(deeanne, blake)\nMesmeric(deeanne)\nInterbreed(jacquelin, blake)\nReddish(jacquelin)\nAbsent(jacquelin, deeanne)\nInterbreed(betta, deeanne)\nSpeedy(betta)\nMesmeric(betta)\nReddish(betta)\nAbsent(betta, deeanne)\nPall(betta, deeanne)\nInterbreed(blake, betta)\nAbsent(blake, betta)\nPall(blake, deeanne)\nforall x (Pall(x, blake) and Interbreed(x, deeanne) -> Absent(blake, deeanne))\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Absent(x, betta) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> Absent(x, betta))\nforall x (Absent(x, blake) -> Federal(blake))\nforall x (Absent(x, blake) -> Pall(x, blake))\nforall x (Speedy(x) and Downlike(x) -> Federal(x))\nforall x (Interbreed(x, deeanne) -> Reddish(x))\n\nnot Pall(betta, blake)\n\nforall x (Absent(x, blake) -> Pall(x, blake)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The mikako tink the tamas. The mikako tink the germaine. The mikako is loamy. The delora tink the germaine. The delora is awned. The delora conspire the mikako. The tamas tink the mikako. The tamas is unwavering. The tamas is loamy. The tamas is awned. The tamas conspire the mikako. The tamas louden the mikako. The germaine tink the tamas. The germaine conspire the tamas. The germaine louden the mikako. If someone louden the germaine and they chase the mikako then the germaine conspire the mikako. All unwavering people are overpriced. If someone conspire the tamas then they are loamy. If someone is unabashed then they like the tamas. If someone conspire the germaine then the germaine is unabashed. If someone conspire the germaine then they need the germaine. If someone is unwavering and overpriced then they are unabashed. If someone tink the mikako then they are awned. The delora louden the delora.", "logic": "\nTink(mikako, tamas)\nTink(mikako, germaine)\nLoamy(mikako)\nTink(delora, germaine)\nAwned(delora)\nConspire(delora, mikako)\nTink(tamas, mikako)\nUnwavering(tamas)\nLoamy(tamas)\nAwned(tamas)\nConspire(tamas, mikako)\nLouden(tamas, mikako)\nTink(germaine, tamas)\nConspire(germaine, tamas)\nLouden(germaine, mikako)\nforall x (Louden(x, germaine) and Tink(x, mikako) -> Conspire(germaine, mikako))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> Overpriced(x))\nforall x (Conspire(x, tamas) -> Loamy(x))\nforall x (Unabashed(x) -> Conspire(x, tamas))\nforall x (Conspire(x, germaine) -> Unabashed(germaine))\nforall x (Conspire(x, germaine) -> Louden(x, germaine))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) and Overpriced(x) -> Unabashed(x))\nforall x (Tink(x, mikako) -> Awned(x))\n\nLouden(delora, delora)\n\nLouden(delora, delora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The georgia complicate the benita. The georgia complicate the becki. The georgia is monotone. The vincents complicate the becki. The vincents is ninetieth. The vincents transfer the georgia. The benita complicate the georgia. The benita is hypnoid. The benita is monotone. The benita is ninetieth. The benita transfer the georgia. The benita reload the georgia. The becki complicate the benita. The becki transfer the benita. The becki reload the georgia. If someone reload the becki and they chase the georgia then the becki transfer the georgia. All hypnoid people are deuced. If someone transfer the benita then they are monotone. If someone is unarmed then they like the benita. If someone transfer the becki then the becki is unarmed. If someone transfer the becki then they need the becki. If someone is hypnoid and deuced then they are unarmed. If someone complicate the georgia then they are ninetieth. The becki does not like the becki.", "logic": "\nComplicate(georgia, benita)\nComplicate(georgia, becki)\nMonotone(georgia)\nComplicate(vincents, becki)\nNinetieth(vincents)\nTransfer(vincents, georgia)\nComplicate(benita, georgia)\nHypnoid(benita)\nMonotone(benita)\nNinetieth(benita)\nTransfer(benita, georgia)\nReload(benita, georgia)\nComplicate(becki, benita)\nTransfer(becki, benita)\nReload(becki, georgia)\nforall x (Reload(x, becki) and Complicate(x, georgia) -> Transfer(becki, georgia))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Transfer(x, benita) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Unarmed(x) -> Transfer(x, benita))\nforall x (Transfer(x, becki) -> Unarmed(becki))\nforall x (Transfer(x, becki) -> Reload(x, becki))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Deuced(x) -> Unarmed(x))\nforall x (Complicate(x, georgia) -> Ninetieth(x))\n\nnot Transfer(becki, becki)\n\nnot Transfer(becki, becki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "The claudelle repot the sileas. The claudelle repot the chrysa. The claudelle is sedative. The roy repot the chrysa. The roy is avowed. The roy overdraw the claudelle. The sileas repot the claudelle. The sileas is chivalrous. The sileas is sedative. The sileas is avowed. The sileas overdraw the claudelle. The sileas locomote the claudelle. The chrysa repot the sileas. The chrysa overdraw the sileas. The chrysa locomote the claudelle. If someone locomote the chrysa and they chase the claudelle then the chrysa overdraw the claudelle. All chivalrous people are graphical. If someone overdraw the sileas then they are sedative. If someone is unstated then they like the sileas. If someone overdraw the chrysa then the chrysa is unstated. If someone overdraw the chrysa then they need the chrysa. If someone is chivalrous and graphical then they are unstated. If someone repot the claudelle then they are avowed. The roy repot the sileas.", "logic": "\nRepot(claudelle, sileas)\nRepot(claudelle, chrysa)\nSedative(claudelle)\nRepot(roy, chrysa)\nAvowed(roy)\nOverdraw(roy, claudelle)\nRepot(sileas, claudelle)\nChivalrous(sileas)\nSedative(sileas)\nAvowed(sileas)\nOverdraw(sileas, claudelle)\nLocomote(sileas, claudelle)\nRepot(chrysa, sileas)\nOverdraw(chrysa, sileas)\nLocomote(chrysa, claudelle)\nforall x (Locomote(x, chrysa) and Repot(x, claudelle) -> Overdraw(chrysa, claudelle))\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) -> Graphical(x))\nforall x (Overdraw(x, sileas) -> Sedative(x))\nforall x (Unstated(x) -> Overdraw(x, sileas))\nforall x (Overdraw(x, chrysa) -> Unstated(chrysa))\nforall x (Overdraw(x, chrysa) -> Locomote(x, chrysa))\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) and Graphical(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Repot(x, claudelle) -> Avowed(x))\n\nRepot(roy, sileas)\n\nRepot(roy, sileas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1544"} {"premises": "Maude is refreshed. Jaime is rampant. Jaime is ionised. Barton is rampant. Giselle is disruptive. Giselle is offside. Giselle is rampant. Young things are disruptive. Round things are jolty. Jaime is rampant.", "logic": "\nRefreshed(maude)\nRampant(jaime)\nIonised(jaime)\nRampant(barton)\nDisruptive(giselle)\nOffside(giselle)\nRampant(giselle)\nforall x (Jolty(x) -> Disruptive(x))\nforall x (Rampant(x) -> Jolty(x))\n\nRampant(jaime)\n\ntherefore Rampant(jaime)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Coletta is lopsided. Ann is ungarbed. Ann is causative. Marcellus is ungarbed. Joelly is blinding. Joelly is digitate. Joelly is ungarbed. Young things are blinding. Round things are nonionised. Ann is not causative.", "logic": "\nLopsided(coletta)\nUngarbed(ann)\nCausative(ann)\nUngarbed(marcellus)\nBlinding(joelly)\nDigitate(joelly)\nUngarbed(joelly)\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Blinding(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Nonionised(x))\n\nnot Causative(ann)\n\ntherefore Causative(ann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Sully is doctorial. Nunzio is satiate. Nunzio is palliative. Harmonie is satiate. Logan is rimmed. Logan is oriental. Logan is satiate. Young things are rimmed. Round things are healthful. Logan is healthful.", "logic": "\nDoctorial(sully)\nSatiate(nunzio)\nPalliative(nunzio)\nSatiate(harmonie)\nRimmed(logan)\nOriental(logan)\nSatiate(logan)\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Rimmed(x))\nforall x (Satiate(x) -> Healthful(x))\n\nHealthful(logan)\n\nSatiate(logan) and forall x (Satiate(x) -> Healthful(x)) -> therefore Healthful(logan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Merl is flyblown. Cindee is barebacked. Cindee is demagogic. Jeanne is barebacked. Alberta is elastic. Alberta is random. Alberta is barebacked. Young things are elastic. Round things are wily. Jeanne is not wily.", "logic": "\nFlyblown(merl)\nBarebacked(cindee)\nDemagogic(cindee)\nBarebacked(jeanne)\nElastic(alberta)\nRandom(alberta)\nBarebacked(alberta)\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Barebacked(x) -> Wily(x))\n\nnot Wily(jeanne)\n\nBarebacked(jeanne) and forall x (Barebacked(x) -> Wily(x)) -> therefore Wily(jeanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Elisa is chadian. Vivianne is footsore. Vivianne is brilliant. Lanita is footsore. Tedra is stormproof. Tedra is impeding. Tedra is footsore. Young things are stormproof. Round things are gainful. Lanita is stormproof.", "logic": "\nChadian(elisa)\nFootsore(vivianne)\nBrilliant(vivianne)\nFootsore(lanita)\nStormproof(tedra)\nImpeding(tedra)\nFootsore(tedra)\nforall x (Gainful(x) -> Stormproof(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) -> Gainful(x))\n\nStormproof(lanita)\n\nFootsore(lanita) and forall x (Footsore(x) -> Gainful(x)) -> therefore Gainful(lanita) Gainful(lanita) and forall x (Gainful(x) -> Stormproof(x)) -> therefore Stormproof(lanita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Hyacintha is patent. Sylvie is solved. Sylvie is inhibited. Bab is solved. Jeanie is retral. Jeanie is exposed. Jeanie is solved. Young things are retral. Round things are infantile. Sylvie is not retral.", "logic": "\nPatent(hyacintha)\nSolved(sylvie)\nInhibited(sylvie)\nSolved(bab)\nRetral(jeanie)\nExposed(jeanie)\nSolved(jeanie)\nforall x (Infantile(x) -> Retral(x))\nforall x (Solved(x) -> Infantile(x))\n\nnot Retral(sylvie)\n\nSolved(sylvie) and forall x (Solved(x) -> Infantile(x)) -> therefore Infantile(sylvie) Infantile(sylvie) and forall x (Infantile(x) -> Retral(x)) -> therefore Retral(sylvie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Tonia is sabbatic. Lars is structured. Lars is middling. Emalee is structured. Betta is untired. Betta is referent. Betta is structured. Young things are untired. Round things are fair. Tonia is not untired.", "logic": "\nSabbatic(tonia)\nStructured(lars)\nMiddling(lars)\nStructured(emalee)\nUntired(betta)\nReferent(betta)\nStructured(betta)\nforall x (Fair(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) -> Fair(x))\n\nnot Untired(tonia)\n\nforall x (Fair(x) -> Untired(x)) <- forall x (Structured(x) -> Fair(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Gustave is mobile. Janetta is unknowable. Janetta is hilar. Bernete is unknowable. Jeromy is impugnable. Jeromy is tinselly. Jeromy is unknowable. Young things are impugnable. Round things are stacked. Gustave is stacked.", "logic": "\nMobile(gustave)\nUnknowable(janetta)\nHilar(janetta)\nUnknowable(bernete)\nImpugnable(jeromy)\nTinselly(jeromy)\nUnknowable(jeromy)\nforall x (Stacked(x) -> Impugnable(x))\nforall x (Unknowable(x) -> Stacked(x))\n\nStacked(gustave)\n\nforall x (Unknowable(x) -> Stacked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Kalle is deductible. Burke is weekly. Burke is still. Katharyn is weekly. Jordana is cleanly. Jordana is deviate. Jordana is weekly. Young things are cleanly. Round things are snazzy. Kalle is not weekly.", "logic": "\nDeductible(kalle)\nWeekly(burke)\nStill(burke)\nWeekly(katharyn)\nCleanly(jordana)\nDeviate(jordana)\nWeekly(jordana)\nforall x (Snazzy(x) -> Cleanly(x))\nforall x (Weekly(x) -> Snazzy(x))\n\nnot Weekly(kalle)\n\nnot Weekly(kalle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Ronna is afghani. Hakeem is spicate. Hakeem is whiskery. Alana is spicate. Vasily is isogonic. Vasily is vinaceous. Vasily is spicate. Young things are isogonic. Round things are cherubic. Hakeem is vinaceous.", "logic": "\nAfghani(ronna)\nSpicate(hakeem)\nWhiskery(hakeem)\nSpicate(alana)\nIsogonic(vasily)\nVinaceous(vasily)\nSpicate(vasily)\nforall x (Cherubic(x) -> Isogonic(x))\nforall x (Spicate(x) -> Cherubic(x))\n\nVinaceous(hakeem)\n\nVinaceous(hakeem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Janessa is crowing. Archibald is choric. Archibald is debatable. Bernard is choric. Essie is steadying. Essie is dyslexic. Essie is choric. Young things are steadying. Round things are errhine. Archibald is not furry.", "logic": "\nCrowing(janessa)\nChoric(archibald)\nDebatable(archibald)\nChoric(bernard)\nSteadying(essie)\nDyslexic(essie)\nChoric(essie)\nforall x (Errhine(x) -> Steadying(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Errhine(x))\n\nnot Furry(archibald)\n\nnot Furry(archibald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Kaitlyn is chaldee. Doria is seasoned. Doria is honeylike. Otes is seasoned. Dorelia is stuffy. Dorelia is insectan. Dorelia is seasoned. Young things are stuffy. Round things are disguised. Dorelia is honeylike.", "logic": "\nChaldee(kaitlyn)\nSeasoned(doria)\nHoneylike(doria)\nSeasoned(otes)\nStuffy(dorelia)\nInsectan(dorelia)\nSeasoned(dorelia)\nforall x (Disguised(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) -> Disguised(x))\n\nHoneylike(dorelia)\n\nHoneylike(dorelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2408"} {"premises": "Stanfield is topknotted. Stanfield is interwoven. Stanfield is jihadi. Stanfield is still. Jeremiah is changed. Arlette is topknotted. Arlette is still. All interwoven things are eremitical. Nice, still things are diffusive. Quiet things are changed. Stanfield is jihadi.", "logic": "\nTopknotted(stanfield)\nInterwoven(stanfield)\nJihadi(stanfield)\nStill(stanfield)\nChanged(jeremiah)\nTopknotted(arlette)\nStill(arlette)\nforall x (Interwoven(x) -> Eremitical(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Still(x) -> Diffusive(x))\nforall x (Eremitical(x) -> Changed(x))\n\nJihadi(stanfield)\n\ntherefore Jihadi(stanfield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Patti is archaic. Patti is derived. Patti is vibrionic. Patti is nonresiny. Mario is dictated. Baird is archaic. Baird is nonresiny. All derived things are printable. Nice, nonresiny things are idiotic. Quiet things are dictated. Baird is not nonresiny.", "logic": "\nArchaic(patti)\nDerived(patti)\nVibrionic(patti)\nNonresiny(patti)\nDictated(mario)\nArchaic(baird)\nNonresiny(baird)\nforall x (Derived(x) -> Printable(x))\nforall x (Derived(x) and Nonresiny(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Printable(x) -> Dictated(x))\n\nnot Nonresiny(baird)\n\ntherefore Nonresiny(baird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Faye is couthy. Faye is crenate. Faye is ahead. Faye is xxii. Helsa is agone. Xenia is couthy. Xenia is xxii. All crenate things are dour. Nice, xxii things are mixed. Quiet things are agone. Faye is mixed.", "logic": "\nCouthy(faye)\nCrenate(faye)\nAhead(faye)\nXxii(faye)\nAgone(helsa)\nCouthy(xenia)\nXxii(xenia)\nforall x (Crenate(x) -> Dour(x))\nforall x (Crenate(x) and Xxii(x) -> Mixed(x))\nforall x (Dour(x) -> Agone(x))\n\nMixed(faye)\n\nCrenate(faye) and Xxii(faye) and forall x (Crenate(x) and Xxii(x) -> Mixed(x)) -> therefore Mixed(faye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Gigi is plumelike. Gigi is anodic. Gigi is tried. Gigi is blastular. Stevy is merry. Orlando is plumelike. Orlando is blastular. All anodic things are unguarded. Nice, blastular things are imbalanced. Quiet things are merry. Gigi is not unguarded.", "logic": "\nPlumelike(gigi)\nAnodic(gigi)\nTried(gigi)\nBlastular(gigi)\nMerry(stevy)\nPlumelike(orlando)\nBlastular(orlando)\nforall x (Anodic(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nforall x (Anodic(x) and Blastular(x) -> Imbalanced(x))\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Merry(x))\n\nnot Unguarded(gigi)\n\nAnodic(gigi) and forall x (Anodic(x) -> Unguarded(x)) -> therefore Unguarded(gigi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Mignonne is realised. Mignonne is memorable. Mignonne is threadlike. Mignonne is unmoved. Lilllie is clashing. Lydia is realised. Lydia is unmoved. All memorable things are vulgar. Nice, unmoved things are cured. Quiet things are clashing. Mignonne is clashing.", "logic": "\nRealised(mignonne)\nMemorable(mignonne)\nThreadlike(mignonne)\nUnmoved(mignonne)\nClashing(lilllie)\nRealised(lydia)\nUnmoved(lydia)\nforall x (Memorable(x) -> Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) and Unmoved(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Clashing(x))\n\nClashing(mignonne)\n\nMemorable(mignonne) and forall x (Memorable(x) -> Vulgar(x)) -> therefore Vulgar(mignonne) Vulgar(mignonne) and forall x (Vulgar(x) -> Clashing(x)) -> therefore Clashing(mignonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Sidonia is transfixed. Sidonia is direful. Sidonia is slick. Sidonia is cusped. Vonni is refreshed. Hendrick is transfixed. Hendrick is cusped. All direful things are roumanian. Nice, cusped things are jamaican. Quiet things are refreshed. Sidonia is not refreshed.", "logic": "\nTransfixed(sidonia)\nDireful(sidonia)\nSlick(sidonia)\nCusped(sidonia)\nRefreshed(vonni)\nTransfixed(hendrick)\nCusped(hendrick)\nforall x (Direful(x) -> Roumanian(x))\nforall x (Direful(x) and Cusped(x) -> Jamaican(x))\nforall x (Roumanian(x) -> Refreshed(x))\n\nnot Refreshed(sidonia)\n\nDireful(sidonia) and forall x (Direful(x) -> Roumanian(x)) -> therefore Roumanian(sidonia) Roumanian(sidonia) and forall x (Roumanian(x) -> Refreshed(x)) -> therefore Refreshed(sidonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Engelbert is residual. Engelbert is antiblack. Engelbert is southwest. Engelbert is unrivalled. Claudie is snappish. Quillan is residual. Quillan is unrivalled. All antiblack things are infrahuman. Nice, unrivalled things are fernless. Quiet things are snappish. Quillan is not snappish.", "logic": "\nResidual(engelbert)\nAntiblack(engelbert)\nSouthwest(engelbert)\nUnrivalled(engelbert)\nSnappish(claudie)\nResidual(quillan)\nUnrivalled(quillan)\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Infrahuman(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) and Unrivalled(x) -> Fernless(x))\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Snappish(x))\n\nnot Snappish(quillan)\n\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Snappish(x)) <- forall x (Antiblack(x) -> Infrahuman(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Dallas is tepid. Dallas is botulinal. Dallas is botulinal. Dallas is uniformed. Ann is tireless. Parsifal is tepid. Parsifal is uniformed. All botulinal things are metastatic. Nice, uniformed things are masterly. Quiet things are tireless. Ann is metastatic.", "logic": "\nTepid(dallas)\nBotulinal(dallas)\nBotulinal(dallas)\nUniformed(dallas)\nTireless(ann)\nTepid(parsifal)\nUniformed(parsifal)\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Metastatic(x))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) and Uniformed(x) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Metastatic(x) -> Tireless(x))\n\nMetastatic(ann)\n\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Metastatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Reynold is wheezing. Reynold is anuric. Reynold is lecherous. Reynold is utopian. Willis is twelve. Nadeen is wheezing. Nadeen is utopian. All anuric things are doltish. Nice, utopian things are gyroscopic. Quiet things are twelve. Nadeen is not doltish.", "logic": "\nWheezing(reynold)\nAnuric(reynold)\nLecherous(reynold)\nUtopian(reynold)\nTwelve(willis)\nWheezing(nadeen)\nUtopian(nadeen)\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Doltish(x))\nforall x (Anuric(x) and Utopian(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) -> Twelve(x))\n\nnot Doltish(nadeen)\n\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Doltish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Kaile is chaotic. Kaile is nameless. Kaile is standpat. Kaile is angelical. Darwin is unequalled. Ingmar is chaotic. Ingmar is angelical. All nameless things are mormon. Nice, angelical things are scalar. Quiet things are unequalled. Darwin is standpat.", "logic": "\nChaotic(kaile)\nNameless(kaile)\nStandpat(kaile)\nAngelical(kaile)\nUnequalled(darwin)\nChaotic(ingmar)\nAngelical(ingmar)\nforall x (Nameless(x) -> Mormon(x))\nforall x (Nameless(x) and Angelical(x) -> Scalar(x))\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Unequalled(x))\n\nStandpat(darwin)\n\nStandpat(darwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Catherin is sumptuous. Catherin is oblique. Catherin is arcane. Catherin is lashing. Alyssa is second. Stafford is sumptuous. Stafford is lashing. All oblique things are seventh. Nice, lashing things are digestible. Quiet things are second. Alyssa is not sumptuous.", "logic": "\nSumptuous(catherin)\nOblique(catherin)\nArcane(catherin)\nLashing(catherin)\nSecond(alyssa)\nSumptuous(stafford)\nLashing(stafford)\nforall x (Oblique(x) -> Seventh(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) and Lashing(x) -> Digestible(x))\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> Second(x))\n\nnot Sumptuous(alyssa)\n\nnot Sumptuous(alyssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Danit is stooping. Danit is unattached. Danit is regulation. Danit is dermic. Nettie is ignited. Glad is stooping. Glad is dermic. All unattached things are endozoic. Nice, dermic things are animate. Quiet things are ignited. Nettie is unattached.", "logic": "\nStooping(danit)\nUnattached(danit)\nRegulation(danit)\nDermic(danit)\nIgnited(nettie)\nStooping(glad)\nDermic(glad)\nforall x (Unattached(x) -> Endozoic(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and Dermic(x) -> Animate(x))\nforall x (Endozoic(x) -> Ignited(x))\n\nUnattached(nettie)\n\nUnattached(nettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2015"} {"premises": "Giacomo is binuclear. Giacomo is heartfelt. Giacomo is censorial. Aldo is apodeictic. Aldo is heartfelt. Evan is overnice. Evan is acetic. Green things are heartfelt. All censorial things are preventive. If something is preventive then it is acetic. Giacomo is heartfelt.", "logic": "\nBinuclear(giacomo)\nHeartfelt(giacomo)\nCensorial(giacomo)\nApodeictic(aldo)\nHeartfelt(aldo)\nOvernice(evan)\nAcetic(evan)\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Censorial(x) -> Preventive(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> Acetic(x))\n\nHeartfelt(giacomo)\n\ntherefore Heartfelt(giacomo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Edithe is sacculate. Edithe is unrewarded. Edithe is infective. Sherilyn is antithetic. Sherilyn is unrewarded. Wolfram is forensic. Wolfram is admissive. Green things are unrewarded. All infective things are plantar. If something is plantar then it is admissive. Sherilyn is not antithetic.", "logic": "\nSacculate(edithe)\nUnrewarded(edithe)\nInfective(edithe)\nAntithetic(sherilyn)\nUnrewarded(sherilyn)\nForensic(wolfram)\nAdmissive(wolfram)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Unrewarded(x))\nforall x (Infective(x) -> Plantar(x))\nforall x (Plantar(x) -> Admissive(x))\n\nnot Antithetic(sherilyn)\n\ntherefore Antithetic(sherilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Laurence is flossy. Laurence is detersive. Laurence is apodous. Merle is vehement. Merle is detersive. Gertrudis is snobby. Gertrudis is lupine. Green things are detersive. All apodous things are purposive. If something is purposive then it is lupine. Laurence is purposive.", "logic": "\nFlossy(laurence)\nDetersive(laurence)\nApodous(laurence)\nVehement(merle)\nDetersive(merle)\nSnobby(gertrudis)\nLupine(gertrudis)\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Detersive(x))\nforall x (Apodous(x) -> Purposive(x))\nforall x (Purposive(x) -> Lupine(x))\n\nPurposive(laurence)\n\nApodous(laurence) and forall x (Apodous(x) -> Purposive(x)) -> therefore Purposive(laurence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "June is charcoal. June is crabby. June is unassured. Carlyle is partitive. Carlyle is crabby. Maribeth is sikh. Maribeth is eastern. Green things are crabby. All unassured things are boxed. If something is boxed then it is eastern. June is not boxed.", "logic": "\nCharcoal(june)\nCrabby(june)\nUnassured(june)\nPartitive(carlyle)\nCrabby(carlyle)\nSikh(maribeth)\nEastern(maribeth)\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Crabby(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Boxed(x))\nforall x (Boxed(x) -> Eastern(x))\n\nnot Boxed(june)\n\nUnassured(june) and forall x (Unassured(x) -> Boxed(x)) -> therefore Boxed(june)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Magda is unrigged. Magda is unveiled. Magda is perverted. Quiggly is bimanual. Quiggly is unveiled. Kimmy is indulgent. Kimmy is taped. Green things are unveiled. All perverted things are expected. If something is expected then it is taped. Magda is taped.", "logic": "\nUnrigged(magda)\nUnveiled(magda)\nPerverted(magda)\nBimanual(quiggly)\nUnveiled(quiggly)\nIndulgent(kimmy)\nTaped(kimmy)\nforall x (Bimanual(x) -> Unveiled(x))\nforall x (Perverted(x) -> Expected(x))\nforall x (Expected(x) -> Taped(x))\n\nTaped(magda)\n\nPerverted(magda) and forall x (Perverted(x) -> Expected(x)) -> therefore Expected(magda) Expected(magda) and forall x (Expected(x) -> Taped(x)) -> therefore Taped(magda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Shaun is overt. Shaun is ergotropic. Shaun is supported. Ophelia is poor. Ophelia is ergotropic. Harold is toeless. Harold is straying. Green things are ergotropic. All supported things are serologic. If something is serologic then it is straying. Shaun is not straying.", "logic": "\nOvert(shaun)\nErgotropic(shaun)\nSupported(shaun)\nPoor(ophelia)\nErgotropic(ophelia)\nToeless(harold)\nStraying(harold)\nforall x (Poor(x) -> Ergotropic(x))\nforall x (Supported(x) -> Serologic(x))\nforall x (Serologic(x) -> Straying(x))\n\nnot Straying(shaun)\n\nSupported(shaun) and forall x (Supported(x) -> Serologic(x)) -> therefore Serologic(shaun) Serologic(shaun) and forall x (Serologic(x) -> Straying(x)) -> therefore Straying(shaun)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Noble is unimproved. Noble is stoppable. Noble is alveolar. Hanna is genital. Hanna is stoppable. Rasia is paschal. Rasia is malian. Green things are stoppable. All alveolar things are ungenerous. If something is ungenerous then it is malian. Hanna is not malian.", "logic": "\nUnimproved(noble)\nStoppable(noble)\nAlveolar(noble)\nGenital(hanna)\nStoppable(hanna)\nPaschal(rasia)\nMalian(rasia)\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nforall x (Alveolar(x) -> Ungenerous(x))\nforall x (Ungenerous(x) -> Malian(x))\n\nnot Malian(hanna)\n\nforall x (Ungenerous(x) -> Malian(x)) <- forall x (Alveolar(x) -> Ungenerous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Amandi is perfect. Amandi is spayed. Amandi is protrusive. Liza is georgian. Liza is spayed. Lorelle is motor. Lorelle is assaultive. Green things are spayed. All protrusive things are floored. If something is floored then it is assaultive. Lorelle is floored.", "logic": "\nPerfect(amandi)\nSpayed(amandi)\nProtrusive(amandi)\nGeorgian(liza)\nSpayed(liza)\nMotor(lorelle)\nAssaultive(lorelle)\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Spayed(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Floored(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) -> Assaultive(x))\n\nFloored(lorelle)\n\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Floored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Barnabe is lucid. Barnabe is sweptwing. Barnabe is scabby. Evanne is aphoristic. Evanne is sweptwing. Bernadene is braw. Bernadene is untethered. Green things are sweptwing. All scabby things are feminine. If something is feminine then it is untethered. Evanne is not feminine.", "logic": "\nLucid(barnabe)\nSweptwing(barnabe)\nScabby(barnabe)\nAphoristic(evanne)\nSweptwing(evanne)\nBraw(bernadene)\nUntethered(bernadene)\nforall x (Aphoristic(x) -> Sweptwing(x))\nforall x (Scabby(x) -> Feminine(x))\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Untethered(x))\n\nnot Feminine(evanne)\n\nforall x (Scabby(x) -> Feminine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Niki is cellulosid. Niki is pustulate. Niki is laboured. Garvin is tasty. Garvin is pustulate. Juergen is oxidized. Juergen is bellyless. Green things are pustulate. All laboured things are malleable. If something is malleable then it is bellyless. Garvin is oxidized.", "logic": "\nCellulosid(niki)\nPustulate(niki)\nLaboured(niki)\nTasty(garvin)\nPustulate(garvin)\nOxidized(juergen)\nBellyless(juergen)\nforall x (Tasty(x) -> Pustulate(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> Malleable(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) -> Bellyless(x))\n\nOxidized(garvin)\n\nOxidized(garvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Freddy is uxorial. Freddy is virtuous. Freddy is amative. Dick is crispy. Dick is virtuous. Lynne is womanlike. Lynne is ametropic. Green things are virtuous. All amative things are tailless. If something is tailless then it is ametropic. Lynne is not amative.", "logic": "\nUxorial(freddy)\nVirtuous(freddy)\nAmative(freddy)\nCrispy(dick)\nVirtuous(dick)\nWomanlike(lynne)\nAmetropic(lynne)\nforall x (Crispy(x) -> Virtuous(x))\nforall x (Amative(x) -> Tailless(x))\nforall x (Tailless(x) -> Ametropic(x))\n\nnot Amative(lynne)\n\nnot Amative(lynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "Ilysa is thinkable. Ilysa is slithering. Ilysa is assentient. Roxane is osmotic. Roxane is slithering. Matty is sorrowing. Matty is teutonic. Green things are slithering. All assentient things are rococo. If something is rococo then it is teutonic. Roxane is assentient.", "logic": "\nThinkable(ilysa)\nSlithering(ilysa)\nAssentient(ilysa)\nOsmotic(roxane)\nSlithering(roxane)\nSorrowing(matty)\nTeutonic(matty)\nforall x (Osmotic(x) -> Slithering(x))\nforall x (Assentient(x) -> Rococo(x))\nforall x (Rococo(x) -> Teutonic(x))\n\nAssentient(roxane)\n\nAssentient(roxane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-243"} {"premises": "The rodi recline the lily. The blakeley is undamaged. The lily quit the rodi. If someone drool the rodi and they visit the lily then the lily is undamaged. If someone drool the blakeley then the blakeley recline the rodi. If someone quit the blakeley and the blakeley recline the lily then the lily is privy. If the rodi drool the blakeley and the blakeley is not untapped then the blakeley is unbarred. If the blakeley drool the lily and the blakeley does not visit the lily then the blakeley does not need the rodi. If someone quit the rodi then they see the blakeley. If someone drool the blakeley and the blakeley is privy then the blakeley does not see the lily. If the lily is undamaged then the lily quit the rodi. The blakeley is undamaged.", "logic": "\nRecline(rodi, lily)\nUndamaged(blakeley)\nQuit(lily, rodi)\nforall x (Drool(x, rodi) and Recline(x, lily) -> Undamaged(lily))\nforall x (Drool(x, blakeley) -> Recline(blakeley, rodi))\nforall x (Quit(x, blakeley) and Recline(blakeley, lily) -> Privy(lily))\nDrool(rodi, blakeley) and not Untapped(blakeley) -> Unbarred(blakeley)\nDrool(blakeley, lily) and not Recline(blakeley, lily) -> not Quit(blakeley, rodi)\nforall x (Quit(x, rodi) -> Drool(x, blakeley))\nforall x (Drool(x, blakeley) and Privy(blakeley) -> not Drool(blakeley, lily))\nUndamaged(lily) -> Quit(lily, rodi)\n\nUndamaged(blakeley)\n\ntherefore Undamaged(blakeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The ferdy cloy the martica. The ozzy is netted. The martica unbar the ferdy. If someone espy the ferdy and they visit the martica then the martica is netted. If someone espy the ozzy then the ozzy cloy the ferdy. If someone unbar the ozzy and the ozzy cloy the martica then the martica is vertebrate. If the ferdy espy the ozzy and the ozzy is not degage then the ozzy is subdural. If the ozzy espy the martica and the ozzy does not visit the martica then the ozzy does not need the ferdy. If someone unbar the ferdy then they see the ozzy. If someone espy the ozzy and the ozzy is vertebrate then the ozzy does not see the martica. If the martica is netted then the martica unbar the ferdy. The ozzy is not netted.", "logic": "\nCloy(ferdy, martica)\nNetted(ozzy)\nUnbar(martica, ferdy)\nforall x (Espy(x, ferdy) and Cloy(x, martica) -> Netted(martica))\nforall x (Espy(x, ozzy) -> Cloy(ozzy, ferdy))\nforall x (Unbar(x, ozzy) and Cloy(ozzy, martica) -> Vertebrate(martica))\nEspy(ferdy, ozzy) and not Degage(ozzy) -> Subdural(ozzy)\nEspy(ozzy, martica) and not Cloy(ozzy, martica) -> not Unbar(ozzy, ferdy)\nforall x (Unbar(x, ferdy) -> Espy(x, ozzy))\nforall x (Espy(x, ozzy) and Vertebrate(ozzy) -> not Espy(ozzy, martica))\nNetted(martica) -> Unbar(martica, ferdy)\n\nnot Netted(ozzy)\n\ntherefore Netted(ozzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The gardiner brail the todd. The yolanda is bloody. The todd kite the gardiner. If someone outclass the gardiner and they visit the todd then the todd is bloody. If someone outclass the yolanda then the yolanda brail the gardiner. If someone kite the yolanda and the yolanda brail the todd then the todd is arcane. If the gardiner outclass the yolanda and the yolanda is not beseeching then the yolanda is ellipsoid. If the yolanda outclass the todd and the yolanda does not visit the todd then the yolanda does not need the gardiner. If someone kite the gardiner then they see the yolanda. If someone outclass the yolanda and the yolanda is arcane then the yolanda does not see the todd. If the todd is bloody then the todd kite the gardiner. The todd outclass the yolanda.", "logic": "\nBrail(gardiner, todd)\nBloody(yolanda)\nKite(todd, gardiner)\nforall x (Outclass(x, gardiner) and Brail(x, todd) -> Bloody(todd))\nforall x (Outclass(x, yolanda) -> Brail(yolanda, gardiner))\nforall x (Kite(x, yolanda) and Brail(yolanda, todd) -> Arcane(todd))\nOutclass(gardiner, yolanda) and not Beseeching(yolanda) -> Ellipsoid(yolanda)\nOutclass(yolanda, todd) and not Brail(yolanda, todd) -> not Kite(yolanda, gardiner)\nforall x (Kite(x, gardiner) -> Outclass(x, yolanda))\nforall x (Outclass(x, yolanda) and Arcane(yolanda) -> not Outclass(yolanda, todd))\nBloody(todd) -> Kite(todd, gardiner)\n\nOutclass(todd, yolanda)\n\nKite(todd, gardiner) and forall x (Kite(x, gardiner) -> Outclass(x, yolanda)) -> therefore Outclass(todd, yolanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The melanie lubricate the shaughn. The curtice is toeless. The shaughn trance the melanie. If someone profane the melanie and they visit the shaughn then the shaughn is toeless. If someone profane the curtice then the curtice lubricate the melanie. If someone trance the curtice and the curtice lubricate the shaughn then the shaughn is edgeless. If the melanie profane the curtice and the curtice is not dehydrated then the curtice is redheaded. If the curtice profane the shaughn and the curtice does not visit the shaughn then the curtice does not need the melanie. If someone trance the melanie then they see the curtice. If someone profane the curtice and the curtice is edgeless then the curtice does not see the shaughn. If the shaughn is toeless then the shaughn trance the melanie. The shaughn does not see the curtice.", "logic": "\nLubricate(melanie, shaughn)\nToeless(curtice)\nTrance(shaughn, melanie)\nforall x (Profane(x, melanie) and Lubricate(x, shaughn) -> Toeless(shaughn))\nforall x (Profane(x, curtice) -> Lubricate(curtice, melanie))\nforall x (Trance(x, curtice) and Lubricate(curtice, shaughn) -> Edgeless(shaughn))\nProfane(melanie, curtice) and not Dehydrated(curtice) -> Redheaded(curtice)\nProfane(curtice, shaughn) and not Lubricate(curtice, shaughn) -> not Trance(curtice, melanie)\nforall x (Trance(x, melanie) -> Profane(x, curtice))\nforall x (Profane(x, curtice) and Edgeless(curtice) -> not Profane(curtice, shaughn))\nToeless(shaughn) -> Trance(shaughn, melanie)\n\nnot Profane(shaughn, curtice)\n\nTrance(shaughn, melanie) and forall x (Trance(x, melanie) -> Profane(x, curtice)) -> therefore Profane(shaughn, curtice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The sadella reline the charlene. The oreste is compressed. The charlene essay the sadella. If someone sponge the sadella and they visit the charlene then the charlene is compressed. If someone sponge the oreste then the oreste reline the sadella. If someone essay the oreste and the oreste reline the charlene then the charlene is overjoyed. If the sadella sponge the oreste and the oreste is not postwar then the oreste is twinned. If the oreste sponge the charlene and the oreste does not visit the charlene then the oreste does not need the sadella. If someone essay the sadella then they see the oreste. If someone sponge the oreste and the oreste is overjoyed then the oreste does not see the charlene. If the charlene is compressed then the charlene essay the sadella. The oreste reline the sadella.", "logic": "\nReline(sadella, charlene)\nCompressed(oreste)\nEssay(charlene, sadella)\nforall x (Sponge(x, sadella) and Reline(x, charlene) -> Compressed(charlene))\nforall x (Sponge(x, oreste) -> Reline(oreste, sadella))\nforall x (Essay(x, oreste) and Reline(oreste, charlene) -> Overjoyed(charlene))\nSponge(sadella, oreste) and not Postwar(oreste) -> Twinned(oreste)\nSponge(oreste, charlene) and not Reline(oreste, charlene) -> not Essay(oreste, sadella)\nforall x (Essay(x, sadella) -> Sponge(x, oreste))\nforall x (Sponge(x, oreste) and Overjoyed(oreste) -> not Sponge(oreste, charlene))\nCompressed(charlene) -> Essay(charlene, sadella)\n\nReline(oreste, sadella)\n\nEssay(charlene, sadella) and forall x (Essay(x, sadella) -> Sponge(x, oreste)) -> therefore Sponge(charlene, oreste) Sponge(charlene, oreste) and forall x (Sponge(x, oreste) -> Reline(oreste, sadella)) -> therefore Reline(oreste, sadella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The roze gross the madeline. The imelda is homozygous. The madeline size the roze. If someone branch the roze and they visit the madeline then the madeline is homozygous. If someone branch the imelda then the imelda gross the roze. If someone size the imelda and the imelda gross the madeline then the madeline is fumed. If the roze branch the imelda and the imelda is not meaty then the imelda is energetic. If the imelda branch the madeline and the imelda does not visit the madeline then the imelda does not need the roze. If someone size the roze then they see the imelda. If someone branch the imelda and the imelda is fumed then the imelda does not see the madeline. If the madeline is homozygous then the madeline size the roze. The imelda does not visit the roze.", "logic": "\nGross(roze, madeline)\nHomozygous(imelda)\nSize(madeline, roze)\nforall x (Branch(x, roze) and Gross(x, madeline) -> Homozygous(madeline))\nforall x (Branch(x, imelda) -> Gross(imelda, roze))\nforall x (Size(x, imelda) and Gross(imelda, madeline) -> Fumed(madeline))\nBranch(roze, imelda) and not Meaty(imelda) -> Energetic(imelda)\nBranch(imelda, madeline) and not Gross(imelda, madeline) -> not Size(imelda, roze)\nforall x (Size(x, roze) -> Branch(x, imelda))\nforall x (Branch(x, imelda) and Fumed(imelda) -> not Branch(imelda, madeline))\nHomozygous(madeline) -> Size(madeline, roze)\n\nnot Gross(imelda, roze)\n\nSize(madeline, roze) and forall x (Size(x, roze) -> Branch(x, imelda)) -> therefore Branch(madeline, imelda) Branch(madeline, imelda) and forall x (Branch(x, imelda) -> Gross(imelda, roze)) -> therefore Gross(imelda, roze)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The jaclyn slum the klara. The edita is tamil. The klara placard the jaclyn. If someone wobble the jaclyn and they visit the klara then the klara is tamil. If someone wobble the edita then the edita slum the jaclyn. If someone placard the edita and the edita slum the klara then the klara is raised. If the jaclyn wobble the edita and the edita is not political then the edita is elliptical. If the edita wobble the klara and the edita does not visit the klara then the edita does not need the jaclyn. If someone placard the jaclyn then they see the edita. If someone wobble the edita and the edita is raised then the edita does not see the klara. If the klara is tamil then the klara placard the jaclyn. The edita is not elliptical.", "logic": "\nSlum(jaclyn, klara)\nTamil(edita)\nPlacard(klara, jaclyn)\nforall x (Wobble(x, jaclyn) and Slum(x, klara) -> Tamil(klara))\nforall x (Wobble(x, edita) -> Slum(edita, jaclyn))\nforall x (Placard(x, edita) and Slum(edita, klara) -> Raised(klara))\nWobble(jaclyn, edita) and not Political(edita) -> Elliptical(edita)\nWobble(edita, klara) and not Slum(edita, klara) -> not Placard(edita, jaclyn)\nforall x (Placard(x, jaclyn) -> Wobble(x, edita))\nforall x (Wobble(x, edita) and Raised(edita) -> not Wobble(edita, klara))\nTamil(klara) -> Placard(klara, jaclyn)\n\nnot Elliptical(edita)\n\nWobble(jaclyn, edita) and not Political(edita) -> Elliptical(edita) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The anny supple the mirelle. The rozele is degage. The mirelle underlay the anny. If someone despise the anny and they visit the mirelle then the mirelle is degage. If someone despise the rozele then the rozele supple the anny. If someone underlay the rozele and the rozele supple the mirelle then the mirelle is motional. If the anny despise the rozele and the rozele is not famous then the rozele is recreant. If the rozele despise the mirelle and the rozele does not visit the mirelle then the rozele does not need the anny. If someone underlay the anny then they see the rozele. If someone despise the rozele and the rozele is motional then the rozele does not see the mirelle. If the mirelle is degage then the mirelle underlay the anny. The mirelle is degage.", "logic": "\nSupple(anny, mirelle)\nDegage(rozele)\nUnderlay(mirelle, anny)\nforall x (Despise(x, anny) and Supple(x, mirelle) -> Degage(mirelle))\nforall x (Despise(x, rozele) -> Supple(rozele, anny))\nforall x (Underlay(x, rozele) and Supple(rozele, mirelle) -> Motional(mirelle))\nDespise(anny, rozele) and not Famous(rozele) -> Recreant(rozele)\nDespise(rozele, mirelle) and not Supple(rozele, mirelle) -> not Underlay(rozele, anny)\nforall x (Underlay(x, anny) -> Despise(x, rozele))\nforall x (Despise(x, rozele) and Motional(rozele) -> not Despise(rozele, mirelle))\nDegage(mirelle) -> Underlay(mirelle, anny)\n\nDegage(mirelle)\n\nforall x (Despise(x, anny) and Supple(x, mirelle) -> Degage(mirelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The enoch persecute the srinivas. The becky is ingenuous. The srinivas scrub the enoch. If someone degas the enoch and they visit the srinivas then the srinivas is ingenuous. If someone degas the becky then the becky persecute the enoch. If someone scrub the becky and the becky persecute the srinivas then the srinivas is disjoint. If the enoch degas the becky and the becky is not bauxitic then the becky is uncurbed. If the becky degas the srinivas and the becky does not visit the srinivas then the becky does not need the enoch. If someone scrub the enoch then they see the becky. If someone degas the becky and the becky is disjoint then the becky does not see the srinivas. If the srinivas is ingenuous then the srinivas scrub the enoch. The srinivas is not disjoint.", "logic": "\nPersecute(enoch, srinivas)\nIngenuous(becky)\nScrub(srinivas, enoch)\nforall x (Degas(x, enoch) and Persecute(x, srinivas) -> Ingenuous(srinivas))\nforall x (Degas(x, becky) -> Persecute(becky, enoch))\nforall x (Scrub(x, becky) and Persecute(becky, srinivas) -> Disjoint(srinivas))\nDegas(enoch, becky) and not Bauxitic(becky) -> Uncurbed(becky)\nDegas(becky, srinivas) and not Persecute(becky, srinivas) -> not Scrub(becky, enoch)\nforall x (Scrub(x, enoch) -> Degas(x, becky))\nforall x (Degas(x, becky) and Disjoint(becky) -> not Degas(becky, srinivas))\nIngenuous(srinivas) -> Scrub(srinivas, enoch)\n\nnot Disjoint(srinivas)\n\nforall x (Scrub(x, becky) and Persecute(becky, srinivas) -> Disjoint(srinivas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The reinhold demulsify the shelden. The bogdan is unstrained. The shelden alert the reinhold. If someone flump the reinhold and they visit the shelden then the shelden is unstrained. If someone flump the bogdan then the bogdan demulsify the reinhold. If someone alert the bogdan and the bogdan demulsify the shelden then the shelden is prosthetic. If the reinhold flump the bogdan and the bogdan is not deaf then the bogdan is fawning. If the bogdan flump the shelden and the bogdan does not visit the shelden then the bogdan does not need the reinhold. If someone alert the reinhold then they see the bogdan. If someone flump the bogdan and the bogdan is prosthetic then the bogdan does not see the shelden. If the shelden is unstrained then the shelden alert the reinhold. The reinhold flump the reinhold.", "logic": "\nDemulsify(reinhold, shelden)\nUnstrained(bogdan)\nAlert(shelden, reinhold)\nforall x (Flump(x, reinhold) and Demulsify(x, shelden) -> Unstrained(shelden))\nforall x (Flump(x, bogdan) -> Demulsify(bogdan, reinhold))\nforall x (Alert(x, bogdan) and Demulsify(bogdan, shelden) -> Prosthetic(shelden))\nFlump(reinhold, bogdan) and not Deaf(bogdan) -> Fawning(bogdan)\nFlump(bogdan, shelden) and not Demulsify(bogdan, shelden) -> not Alert(bogdan, reinhold)\nforall x (Alert(x, reinhold) -> Flump(x, bogdan))\nforall x (Flump(x, bogdan) and Prosthetic(bogdan) -> not Flump(bogdan, shelden))\nUnstrained(shelden) -> Alert(shelden, reinhold)\n\nFlump(reinhold, reinhold)\n\nFlump(reinhold, reinhold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The sean hold the ali. The jakob is synchronic. The ali interleave the sean. If someone babble the sean and they visit the ali then the ali is synchronic. If someone babble the jakob then the jakob hold the sean. If someone interleave the jakob and the jakob hold the ali then the ali is northward. If the sean babble the jakob and the jakob is not floral then the jakob is vapourific. If the jakob babble the ali and the jakob does not visit the ali then the jakob does not need the sean. If someone interleave the sean then they see the jakob. If someone babble the jakob and the jakob is northward then the jakob does not see the ali. If the ali is synchronic then the ali interleave the sean. The sean does not visit the sean.", "logic": "\nHold(sean, ali)\nSynchronic(jakob)\nInterleave(ali, sean)\nforall x (Babble(x, sean) and Hold(x, ali) -> Synchronic(ali))\nforall x (Babble(x, jakob) -> Hold(jakob, sean))\nforall x (Interleave(x, jakob) and Hold(jakob, ali) -> Northward(ali))\nBabble(sean, jakob) and not Floral(jakob) -> Vapourific(jakob)\nBabble(jakob, ali) and not Hold(jakob, ali) -> not Interleave(jakob, sean)\nforall x (Interleave(x, sean) -> Babble(x, jakob))\nforall x (Babble(x, jakob) and Northward(jakob) -> not Babble(jakob, ali))\nSynchronic(ali) -> Interleave(ali, sean)\n\nnot Hold(sean, sean)\n\nnot Hold(sean, sean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "The ignazio underplay the kittie. The cathrine is unlatched. The kittie joyride the ignazio. If someone wanton the ignazio and they visit the kittie then the kittie is unlatched. If someone wanton the cathrine then the cathrine underplay the ignazio. If someone joyride the cathrine and the cathrine underplay the kittie then the kittie is sinister. If the ignazio wanton the cathrine and the cathrine is not marmoreal then the cathrine is notable. If the cathrine wanton the kittie and the cathrine does not visit the kittie then the cathrine does not need the ignazio. If someone joyride the ignazio then they see the cathrine. If someone wanton the cathrine and the cathrine is sinister then the cathrine does not see the kittie. If the kittie is unlatched then the kittie joyride the ignazio. The ignazio joyride the ignazio.", "logic": "\nUnderplay(ignazio, kittie)\nUnlatched(cathrine)\nJoyride(kittie, ignazio)\nforall x (Wanton(x, ignazio) and Underplay(x, kittie) -> Unlatched(kittie))\nforall x (Wanton(x, cathrine) -> Underplay(cathrine, ignazio))\nforall x (Joyride(x, cathrine) and Underplay(cathrine, kittie) -> Sinister(kittie))\nWanton(ignazio, cathrine) and not Marmoreal(cathrine) -> Notable(cathrine)\nWanton(cathrine, kittie) and not Underplay(cathrine, kittie) -> not Joyride(cathrine, ignazio)\nforall x (Joyride(x, ignazio) -> Wanton(x, cathrine))\nforall x (Wanton(x, cathrine) and Sinister(cathrine) -> not Wanton(cathrine, kittie))\nUnlatched(kittie) -> Joyride(kittie, ignazio)\n\nJoyride(ignazio, ignazio)\n\nJoyride(ignazio, ignazio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-941"} {"premises": "Garfield is correct. Red things are reproving. All eponymic, reproving things are correct. If Garfield is reproving and Garfield is sensitised then Garfield is unruffled. If Garfield is correct then Garfield is sensitised. If something is correct then it is reproving. If something is unabridged and eponymic then it is unruffled. Garfield is correct.", "logic": "\nCorrect(garfield)\nforall x (Unabridged(x) -> Reproving(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and Reproving(x) -> Correct(x))\nReproving(garfield) and Sensitised(garfield) -> Unruffled(garfield)\nCorrect(garfield) -> Sensitised(garfield)\nforall x (Correct(x) -> Reproving(x))\nforall x (Unabridged(x) and Eponymic(x) -> Unruffled(x))\n\nCorrect(garfield)\n\ntherefore Correct(garfield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Fleur is disjunct. Red things are physical. All martian, physical things are disjunct. If Fleur is physical and Fleur is prongy then Fleur is fiendish. If Fleur is disjunct then Fleur is prongy. If something is disjunct then it is physical. If something is trilobate and martian then it is fiendish. Fleur is not disjunct.", "logic": "\nDisjunct(fleur)\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Physical(x))\nforall x (Martian(x) and Physical(x) -> Disjunct(x))\nPhysical(fleur) and Prongy(fleur) -> Fiendish(fleur)\nDisjunct(fleur) -> Prongy(fleur)\nforall x (Disjunct(x) -> Physical(x))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) and Martian(x) -> Fiendish(x))\n\nnot Disjunct(fleur)\n\ntherefore Disjunct(fleur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Peria is attachable. Red things are alpestrine. All jejune, alpestrine things are attachable. If Peria is alpestrine and Peria is petty then Peria is matey. If Peria is attachable then Peria is petty. If something is attachable then it is alpestrine. If something is evacuant and jejune then it is matey. Peria is petty.", "logic": "\nAttachable(peria)\nforall x (Evacuant(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Jejune(x) and Alpestrine(x) -> Attachable(x))\nAlpestrine(peria) and Petty(peria) -> Matey(peria)\nAttachable(peria) -> Petty(peria)\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) and Jejune(x) -> Matey(x))\n\nPetty(peria)\n\nAttachable(peria) and Attachable(peria) -> Petty(peria) -> therefore Petty(peria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Mercy is quaternary. Red things are lxxxiii. All nonstop, lxxxiii things are quaternary. If Mercy is lxxxiii and Mercy is damaged then Mercy is acrogenic. If Mercy is quaternary then Mercy is damaged. If something is quaternary then it is lxxxiii. If something is cuspidate and nonstop then it is acrogenic. Mercy is not lxxxiii.", "logic": "\nQuaternary(mercy)\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and Lxxxiii(x) -> Quaternary(x))\nLxxxiii(mercy) and Damaged(mercy) -> Acrogenic(mercy)\nQuaternary(mercy) -> Damaged(mercy)\nforall x (Quaternary(x) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) and Nonstop(x) -> Acrogenic(x))\n\nnot Lxxxiii(mercy)\n\nQuaternary(mercy) and forall x (Quaternary(x) -> Lxxxiii(x)) -> therefore Lxxxiii(mercy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Candra is beforehand. Red things are dreamed. All winglike, dreamed things are beforehand. If Candra is dreamed and Candra is skittish then Candra is brute. If Candra is beforehand then Candra is skittish. If something is beforehand then it is dreamed. If something is petrous and winglike then it is brute. Candra is brute.", "logic": "\nBeforehand(candra)\nforall x (Petrous(x) -> Dreamed(x))\nforall x (Winglike(x) and Dreamed(x) -> Beforehand(x))\nDreamed(candra) and Skittish(candra) -> Brute(candra)\nBeforehand(candra) -> Skittish(candra)\nforall x (Beforehand(x) -> Dreamed(x))\nforall x (Petrous(x) and Winglike(x) -> Brute(x))\n\nBrute(candra)\n\nBeforehand(candra) and forall x (Beforehand(x) -> Dreamed(x)) -> therefore Dreamed(candra) Beforehand(candra) and Beforehand(candra) -> Skittish(candra) -> therefore Skittish(candra) Dreamed(candra) and Skittish(candra) and Dreamed(candra) and Skittish(candra) -> Brute(candra) -> therefore Brute(candra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Linda is backward. Red things are ardent. All tolerant, ardent things are backward. If Linda is ardent and Linda is advertised then Linda is motherlike. If Linda is backward then Linda is advertised. If something is backward then it is ardent. If something is appetising and tolerant then it is motherlike. Linda is not motherlike.", "logic": "\nBackward(linda)\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Ardent(x))\nforall x (Tolerant(x) and Ardent(x) -> Backward(x))\nArdent(linda) and Advertised(linda) -> Motherlike(linda)\nBackward(linda) -> Advertised(linda)\nforall x (Backward(x) -> Ardent(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) and Tolerant(x) -> Motherlike(x))\n\nnot Motherlike(linda)\n\nBackward(linda) and forall x (Backward(x) -> Ardent(x)) -> therefore Ardent(linda) Backward(linda) and Backward(linda) -> Advertised(linda) -> therefore Advertised(linda) Ardent(linda) and Advertised(linda) and Ardent(linda) and Advertised(linda) -> Motherlike(linda) -> therefore Motherlike(linda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Alyse is spurned. Red things are vile. All unlaced, vile things are spurned. If Alyse is vile and Alyse is jumbled then Alyse is pavlovian. If Alyse is spurned then Alyse is jumbled. If something is spurned then it is vile. If something is prandial and unlaced then it is pavlovian. Alyse is not nice.", "logic": "\nSpurned(alyse)\nforall x (Prandial(x) -> Vile(x))\nforall x (Unlaced(x) and Vile(x) -> Spurned(x))\nVile(alyse) and Jumbled(alyse) -> Pavlovian(alyse)\nSpurned(alyse) -> Jumbled(alyse)\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Vile(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) and Unlaced(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\n\nnot Nice(alyse)\n\nnot Nice(alyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Dorolisa is faded. Red things are thrillful. All tumescent, thrillful things are faded. If Dorolisa is thrillful and Dorolisa is monumental then Dorolisa is daily. If Dorolisa is faded then Dorolisa is monumental. If something is faded then it is thrillful. If something is palmlike and tumescent then it is daily. Dorolisa is palmlike.", "logic": "\nFaded(dorolisa)\nforall x (Palmlike(x) -> Thrillful(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) and Thrillful(x) -> Faded(x))\nThrillful(dorolisa) and Monumental(dorolisa) -> Daily(dorolisa)\nFaded(dorolisa) -> Monumental(dorolisa)\nforall x (Faded(x) -> Thrillful(x))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) and Tumescent(x) -> Daily(x))\n\nPalmlike(dorolisa)\n\nPalmlike(dorolisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "Zachary is alkaloidal. Roselle is not lidless. Roselle is not nostalgic. Roselle is unmedical. Roselle is alkaloidal. Roselle is discalced. Jessalin is lidless. Jessalin is unmedical. Jessalin is dignified. Jessalin is alkaloidal. Jessalin is discalced. Cleopatra is lidless. Cleopatra is nostalgic. Cleopatra is alkaloidal. Cleopatra is discalced. If Zachary is alkaloidal then Zachary is maidenlike. If someone is maidenlike then they are lidless. Cleopatra is nostalgic.", "logic": "\nAlkaloidal(zachary)\nnot Lidless(roselle)\nnot Nostalgic(roselle)\nUnmedical(roselle)\nAlkaloidal(roselle)\nDiscalced(roselle)\nLidless(jessalin)\nUnmedical(jessalin)\nDignified(jessalin)\nAlkaloidal(jessalin)\nDiscalced(jessalin)\nLidless(cleopatra)\nNostalgic(cleopatra)\nAlkaloidal(cleopatra)\nDiscalced(cleopatra)\nAlkaloidal(zachary) -> Maidenlike(zachary)\nforall x (Maidenlike(x) -> Lidless(x))\n\nNostalgic(cleopatra)\n\ntherefore Nostalgic(cleopatra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Edy is splay. Joli is not avid. Joli is not loveless. Joli is thracian. Joli is splay. Joli is induced. Saundra is avid. Saundra is thracian. Saundra is kurdish. Saundra is splay. Saundra is induced. Marko is avid. Marko is loveless. Marko is splay. Marko is induced. If Edy is splay then Edy is anarchical. If someone is anarchical then they are avid. Joli is not splay.", "logic": "\nSplay(edy)\nnot Avid(joli)\nnot Loveless(joli)\nThracian(joli)\nSplay(joli)\nInduced(joli)\nAvid(saundra)\nThracian(saundra)\nKurdish(saundra)\nSplay(saundra)\nInduced(saundra)\nAvid(marko)\nLoveless(marko)\nSplay(marko)\nInduced(marko)\nSplay(edy) -> Anarchical(edy)\nforall x (Anarchical(x) -> Avid(x))\n\nnot Splay(joli)\n\ntherefore Splay(joli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Marianne is depicted. Henrieta is not podlike. Henrieta is not primal. Henrieta is wieldy. Henrieta is depicted. Henrieta is morganatic. Beatriz is podlike. Beatriz is wieldy. Beatriz is overmodest. Beatriz is depicted. Beatriz is morganatic. Cheryl is podlike. Cheryl is primal. Cheryl is depicted. Cheryl is morganatic. If Marianne is depicted then Marianne is demeaning. If someone is demeaning then they are podlike. Marianne is demeaning.", "logic": "\nDepicted(marianne)\nnot Podlike(henrieta)\nnot Primal(henrieta)\nWieldy(henrieta)\nDepicted(henrieta)\nMorganatic(henrieta)\nPodlike(beatriz)\nWieldy(beatriz)\nOvermodest(beatriz)\nDepicted(beatriz)\nMorganatic(beatriz)\nPodlike(cheryl)\nPrimal(cheryl)\nDepicted(cheryl)\nMorganatic(cheryl)\nDepicted(marianne) -> Demeaning(marianne)\nforall x (Demeaning(x) -> Podlike(x))\n\nDemeaning(marianne)\n\nDepicted(marianne) and Depicted(marianne) -> Demeaning(marianne) -> therefore Demeaning(marianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Shellie is functional. Socrates is not shifting. Socrates is not plugged. Socrates is crispy. Socrates is functional. Socrates is lithic. Odette is shifting. Odette is crispy. Odette is mousy. Odette is functional. Odette is lithic. Sianna is shifting. Sianna is plugged. Sianna is functional. Sianna is lithic. If Shellie is functional then Shellie is calamitous. If someone is calamitous then they are shifting. Shellie is not calamitous.", "logic": "\nFunctional(shellie)\nnot Shifting(socrates)\nnot Plugged(socrates)\nCrispy(socrates)\nFunctional(socrates)\nLithic(socrates)\nShifting(odette)\nCrispy(odette)\nMousy(odette)\nFunctional(odette)\nLithic(odette)\nShifting(sianna)\nPlugged(sianna)\nFunctional(sianna)\nLithic(sianna)\nFunctional(shellie) -> Calamitous(shellie)\nforall x (Calamitous(x) -> Shifting(x))\n\nnot Calamitous(shellie)\n\nFunctional(shellie) and Functional(shellie) -> Calamitous(shellie) -> therefore Calamitous(shellie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Aleck is sugared. Elberta is not clement. Elberta is not effortful. Elberta is macedonian. Elberta is sugared. Elberta is musing. Teresina is clement. Teresina is macedonian. Teresina is cathedral. Teresina is sugared. Teresina is musing. Tedie is clement. Tedie is effortful. Tedie is sugared. Tedie is musing. If Aleck is sugared then Aleck is brusk. If someone is brusk then they are clement. Aleck is clement.", "logic": "\nSugared(aleck)\nnot Clement(elberta)\nnot Effortful(elberta)\nMacedonian(elberta)\nSugared(elberta)\nMusing(elberta)\nClement(teresina)\nMacedonian(teresina)\nCathedral(teresina)\nSugared(teresina)\nMusing(teresina)\nClement(tedie)\nEffortful(tedie)\nSugared(tedie)\nMusing(tedie)\nSugared(aleck) -> Brusk(aleck)\nforall x (Brusk(x) -> Clement(x))\n\nClement(aleck)\n\nSugared(aleck) and Sugared(aleck) -> Brusk(aleck) -> therefore Brusk(aleck) Brusk(aleck) and forall x (Brusk(x) -> Clement(x)) -> therefore Clement(aleck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Lazaro is resettled. Dorit is not noduled. Dorit is not pistillate. Dorit is puff. Dorit is resettled. Dorit is hydroponic. Lia is noduled. Lia is puff. Lia is bordered. Lia is resettled. Lia is hydroponic. Donia is noduled. Donia is pistillate. Donia is resettled. Donia is hydroponic. If Lazaro is resettled then Lazaro is siamese. If someone is siamese then they are noduled. Lazaro is not noduled.", "logic": "\nResettled(lazaro)\nnot Noduled(dorit)\nnot Pistillate(dorit)\nPuff(dorit)\nResettled(dorit)\nHydroponic(dorit)\nNoduled(lia)\nPuff(lia)\nBordered(lia)\nResettled(lia)\nHydroponic(lia)\nNoduled(donia)\nPistillate(donia)\nResettled(donia)\nHydroponic(donia)\nResettled(lazaro) -> Siamese(lazaro)\nforall x (Siamese(x) -> Noduled(x))\n\nnot Noduled(lazaro)\n\nResettled(lazaro) and Resettled(lazaro) -> Siamese(lazaro) -> therefore Siamese(lazaro) Siamese(lazaro) and forall x (Siamese(x) -> Noduled(x)) -> therefore Noduled(lazaro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Peg is freaky. Sibylle is not lacrimal. Sibylle is not seraphical. Sibylle is enraptured. Sibylle is freaky. Sibylle is aneurysmal. Gertrudis is lacrimal. Gertrudis is enraptured. Gertrudis is oneiric. Gertrudis is freaky. Gertrudis is aneurysmal. Erinna is lacrimal. Erinna is seraphical. Erinna is freaky. Erinna is aneurysmal. If Peg is freaky then Peg is antecedent. If someone is antecedent then they are lacrimal. Erinna is not antecedent.", "logic": "\nFreaky(peg)\nnot Lacrimal(sibylle)\nnot Seraphical(sibylle)\nEnraptured(sibylle)\nFreaky(sibylle)\nAneurysmal(sibylle)\nLacrimal(gertrudis)\nEnraptured(gertrudis)\nOneiric(gertrudis)\nFreaky(gertrudis)\nAneurysmal(gertrudis)\nLacrimal(erinna)\nSeraphical(erinna)\nFreaky(erinna)\nAneurysmal(erinna)\nFreaky(peg) -> Antecedent(peg)\nforall x (Antecedent(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\n\nnot Antecedent(erinna)\n\nnot Antecedent(erinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Josee is wearisome. Forster is not benzylic. Forster is not cramped. Forster is punctual. Forster is wearisome. Forster is shinto. Reube is benzylic. Reube is punctual. Reube is wizen. Reube is wearisome. Reube is shinto. Tabb is benzylic. Tabb is cramped. Tabb is wearisome. Tabb is shinto. If Josee is wearisome then Josee is swollen. If someone is swollen then they are benzylic. Josee is wizen.", "logic": "\nWearisome(josee)\nnot Benzylic(forster)\nnot Cramped(forster)\nPunctual(forster)\nWearisome(forster)\nShinto(forster)\nBenzylic(reube)\nPunctual(reube)\nWizen(reube)\nWearisome(reube)\nShinto(reube)\nBenzylic(tabb)\nCramped(tabb)\nWearisome(tabb)\nShinto(tabb)\nWearisome(josee) -> Swollen(josee)\nforall x (Swollen(x) -> Benzylic(x))\n\nWizen(josee)\n\nWizen(josee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Winifield is kitschy. Enrika is not unproved. Enrika is not rarified. Enrika is outright. Enrika is kitschy. Enrika is serene. Tootsie is unproved. Tootsie is outright. Tootsie is autarkical. Tootsie is kitschy. Tootsie is serene. Vladimir is unproved. Vladimir is rarified. Vladimir is kitschy. Vladimir is serene. If Winifield is kitschy then Winifield is select. If someone is select then they are unproved. Tootsie is not rarified.", "logic": "\nKitschy(winifield)\nnot Unproved(enrika)\nnot Rarified(enrika)\nOutright(enrika)\nKitschy(enrika)\nSerene(enrika)\nUnproved(tootsie)\nOutright(tootsie)\nAutarkical(tootsie)\nKitschy(tootsie)\nSerene(tootsie)\nUnproved(vladimir)\nRarified(vladimir)\nKitschy(vladimir)\nSerene(vladimir)\nKitschy(winifield) -> Select(winifield)\nforall x (Select(x) -> Unproved(x))\n\nnot Rarified(tootsie)\n\nnot Rarified(tootsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Patsy is viatical. Vin is not eighty. Vin is not provoked. Vin is uncured. Vin is viatical. Vin is paunchy. Kissee is eighty. Kissee is uncured. Kissee is possessed. Kissee is viatical. Kissee is paunchy. Marjory is eighty. Marjory is provoked. Marjory is viatical. Marjory is paunchy. If Patsy is viatical then Patsy is scarce. If someone is scarce then they are eighty. Patsy is uncured.", "logic": "\nViatical(patsy)\nnot Eighty(vin)\nnot Provoked(vin)\nUncured(vin)\nViatical(vin)\nPaunchy(vin)\nEighty(kissee)\nUncured(kissee)\nPossessed(kissee)\nViatical(kissee)\nPaunchy(kissee)\nEighty(marjory)\nProvoked(marjory)\nViatical(marjory)\nPaunchy(marjory)\nViatical(patsy) -> Scarce(patsy)\nforall x (Scarce(x) -> Eighty(x))\n\nUncured(patsy)\n\nUncured(patsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Katya is unbecoming. Mina is not cuspated. Mina is not beaded. Mina is unlipped. Mina is unbecoming. Mina is faveolate. Hetty is cuspated. Hetty is unlipped. Hetty is rearing. Hetty is unbecoming. Hetty is faveolate. Ciel is cuspated. Ciel is beaded. Ciel is unbecoming. Ciel is faveolate. If Katya is unbecoming then Katya is jawed. If someone is jawed then they are cuspated. Katya is not faveolate.", "logic": "\nUnbecoming(katya)\nnot Cuspated(mina)\nnot Beaded(mina)\nUnlipped(mina)\nUnbecoming(mina)\nFaveolate(mina)\nCuspated(hetty)\nUnlipped(hetty)\nRearing(hetty)\nUnbecoming(hetty)\nFaveolate(hetty)\nCuspated(ciel)\nBeaded(ciel)\nUnbecoming(ciel)\nFaveolate(ciel)\nUnbecoming(katya) -> Jawed(katya)\nforall x (Jawed(x) -> Cuspated(x))\n\nnot Faveolate(katya)\n\nnot Faveolate(katya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "Katerina is renascent. Ephram is not metastatic. Ephram is not sweetish. Ephram is shinto. Ephram is renascent. Ephram is justified. Ahmed is metastatic. Ahmed is shinto. Ahmed is unrelaxed. Ahmed is renascent. Ahmed is justified. Dottie is metastatic. Dottie is sweetish. Dottie is renascent. Dottie is justified. If Katerina is renascent then Katerina is fortemente. If someone is fortemente then they are metastatic. Ephram is unrelaxed.", "logic": "\nRenascent(katerina)\nnot Metastatic(ephram)\nnot Sweetish(ephram)\nShinto(ephram)\nRenascent(ephram)\nJustified(ephram)\nMetastatic(ahmed)\nShinto(ahmed)\nUnrelaxed(ahmed)\nRenascent(ahmed)\nJustified(ahmed)\nMetastatic(dottie)\nSweetish(dottie)\nRenascent(dottie)\nJustified(dottie)\nRenascent(katerina) -> Fortemente(katerina)\nforall x (Fortemente(x) -> Metastatic(x))\n\nUnrelaxed(ephram)\n\nUnrelaxed(ephram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The chase is tectonic. All shambolic, tectonic things are unpassable. All junior, upland things are tectonic. All shambolic things are unpassable. All tectonic things are upland. Rough, junior things are tectonic. All tectonic things are shambolic. The chase is tectonic.", "logic": "\nTectonic(chase)\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Tectonic(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) and Upland(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Upland(x))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Junior(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Shambolic(x))\n\nTectonic(chase)\n\ntherefore Tectonic(chase)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The jaynell is timid. All utilizable, timid things are dusty. All main, sizeable things are timid. All utilizable things are dusty. All timid things are sizeable. Rough, main things are timid. All timid things are utilizable. The jaynell is not timid.", "logic": "\nTimid(jaynell)\nforall x (Utilizable(x) and Timid(x) -> Dusty(x))\nforall x (Main(x) and Sizeable(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Utilizable(x) -> Dusty(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Sizeable(x))\nforall x (Utilizable(x) and Main(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Utilizable(x))\n\nnot Timid(jaynell)\n\ntherefore Timid(jaynell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The vonni is caespitose. All plumelike, caespitose things are spayed. All finable, unsugared things are caespitose. All plumelike things are spayed. All caespitose things are unsugared. Rough, finable things are caespitose. All caespitose things are plumelike. The vonni is plumelike.", "logic": "\nCaespitose(vonni)\nforall x (Plumelike(x) and Caespitose(x) -> Spayed(x))\nforall x (Finable(x) and Unsugared(x) -> Caespitose(x))\nforall x (Plumelike(x) -> Spayed(x))\nforall x (Caespitose(x) -> Unsugared(x))\nforall x (Plumelike(x) and Finable(x) -> Caespitose(x))\nforall x (Caespitose(x) -> Plumelike(x))\n\nPlumelike(vonni)\n\nCaespitose(vonni) and forall x (Caespitose(x) -> Plumelike(x)) -> therefore Plumelike(vonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The ronica is vigilant. All unseeyn, vigilant things are bias. All brotherly, pleonastic things are vigilant. All unseeyn things are bias. All vigilant things are pleonastic. Rough, brotherly things are vigilant. All vigilant things are unseeyn. The ronica is not unseeyn.", "logic": "\nVigilant(ronica)\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) and Vigilant(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and Pleonastic(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) and Brotherly(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\n\nnot Unseeyn(ronica)\n\nVigilant(ronica) and forall x (Vigilant(x) -> Unseeyn(x)) -> therefore Unseeyn(ronica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The teryl is thermionic. All rushed, thermionic things are unnerving. All phlegmatic, agamic things are thermionic. All rushed things are unnerving. All thermionic things are agamic. Rough, phlegmatic things are thermionic. All thermionic things are rushed. The teryl is unnerving.", "logic": "\nThermionic(teryl)\nforall x (Rushed(x) and Thermionic(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) and Agamic(x) -> Thermionic(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) -> Agamic(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) and Phlegmatic(x) -> Thermionic(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) -> Rushed(x))\n\nUnnerving(teryl)\n\nThermionic(teryl) and forall x (Thermionic(x) -> Rushed(x)) -> therefore Rushed(teryl) Rushed(teryl) and forall x (Rushed(x) -> Unnerving(x)) -> therefore Unnerving(teryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The raychel is cubelike. All resistant, cubelike things are smoothbore. All untenanted, uncool things are cubelike. All resistant things are smoothbore. All cubelike things are uncool. Rough, untenanted things are cubelike. All cubelike things are resistant. The raychel is not smoothbore.", "logic": "\nCubelike(raychel)\nforall x (Resistant(x) and Cubelike(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) and Uncool(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Resistant(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) -> Uncool(x))\nforall x (Resistant(x) and Untenanted(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) -> Resistant(x))\n\nnot Smoothbore(raychel)\n\nCubelike(raychel) and forall x (Cubelike(x) -> Resistant(x)) -> therefore Resistant(raychel) Resistant(raychel) and forall x (Resistant(x) -> Smoothbore(x)) -> therefore Smoothbore(raychel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The delmar is rostrate. All altricial, rostrate things are seagoing. All wireless, credulous things are rostrate. All altricial things are seagoing. All rostrate things are credulous. Rough, wireless things are rostrate. All rostrate things are altricial. The delmar does not need the delmar.", "logic": "\nRostrate(delmar)\nforall x (Altricial(x) and Rostrate(x) -> Seagoing(x))\nforall x (Wireless(x) and Credulous(x) -> Rostrate(x))\nforall x (Altricial(x) -> Seagoing(x))\nforall x (Rostrate(x) -> Credulous(x))\nforall x (Altricial(x) and Wireless(x) -> Rostrate(x))\nforall x (Rostrate(x) -> Altricial(x))\n\nnot Needs(delmar, delmar)\n\nnot Needs(delmar, delmar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The tharen is chubby. All ocellated, chubby things are entire. All starry, calcic things are chubby. All ocellated things are entire. All chubby things are calcic. Rough, starry things are chubby. All chubby things are ocellated. The tharen sees the tharen.", "logic": "\nChubby(tharen)\nforall x (Ocellated(x) and Chubby(x) -> Entire(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) and Calcic(x) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> Entire(x))\nforall x (Chubby(x) -> Calcic(x))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) and Starry(x) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Chubby(x) -> Ocellated(x))\n\nSees(tharen, tharen)\n\nSees(tharen, tharen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The major is subdued. All horrible, subdued things are offside. All heretical, forty things are subdued. All horrible things are offside. All subdued things are forty. Rough, heretical things are subdued. All subdued things are horrible. The major is not heretical.", "logic": "\nSubdued(major)\nforall x (Horrible(x) and Subdued(x) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Heretical(x) and Forty(x) -> Subdued(x))\nforall x (Horrible(x) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Horrible(x) and Heretical(x) -> Subdued(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Horrible(x))\n\nnot Heretical(major)\n\nnot Heretical(major) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The gracie is boffo. All abiding, boffo things are lumpy. All magenta, standing things are boffo. All abiding things are lumpy. All boffo things are standing. Rough, magenta things are boffo. All boffo things are abiding. The gracie chases the gracie.", "logic": "\nBoffo(gracie)\nforall x (Abiding(x) and Boffo(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Magenta(x) and Standing(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Standing(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) and Magenta(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Abiding(x))\n\nChases(gracie, gracie)\n\nChases(gracie, gracie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1283"} {"premises": "The drea is harmonized. The drea is plump. The albina crenelate the kendre. The albina does not see the drea. The kendre confect the drea. The kendre gimp the drea. The kendre gimp the albina. If something is plump then it gimp the drea. If something crenelate the drea and the drea confect the kendre then the kendre does not see the drea. If something gimp the drea then it confect the drea. If something crenelate the kendre and the kendre is geothermal then the kendre is plump. If something gimp the kendre and the kendre confect the drea then it confect the kendre. If something is landscaped and not harmonized then it confect the kendre. If something is plump and it crenelate the albina then the albina is squatty. If something is harmonized and plump then it crenelate the albina. The drea is plump.", "logic": "\nHarmonized(drea)\nPlump(drea)\nCrenelate(albina, kendre)\nnot Confect(albina, drea)\nConfect(kendre, drea)\nGimp(kendre, drea)\nGimp(kendre, albina)\nforall x (Plump(x) -> Gimp(x, drea))\nforall x (Crenelate(x, drea) and Confect(drea, kendre) -> not Confect(kendre, drea))\nforall x (Gimp(x, drea) -> Confect(x, drea))\nforall x (Crenelate(x, kendre) and Geothermal(kendre) -> Plump(kendre))\nforall x (Gimp(x, kendre) and Confect(kendre, drea) -> Confect(x, kendre))\nforall x (Landscaped(x) and not Harmonized(x) -> Confect(x, kendre))\nforall x (Plump(x) and Crenelate(x, albina) -> Squatty(albina))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and Plump(x) -> Crenelate(x, albina))\n\nPlump(drea)\n\ntherefore Plump(drea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The vanni is acoustic. The vanni is mauve. The ines resurge the jordon. The ines does not see the vanni. The jordon usurp the vanni. The jordon turtle the vanni. The jordon turtle the ines. If something is mauve then it turtle the vanni. If something resurge the vanni and the vanni usurp the jordon then the jordon does not see the vanni. If something turtle the vanni then it usurp the vanni. If something resurge the jordon and the jordon is congruous then the jordon is mauve. If something turtle the jordon and the jordon usurp the vanni then it usurp the jordon. If something is tenderised and not acoustic then it usurp the jordon. If something is mauve and it resurge the ines then the ines is alopecic. If something is acoustic and mauve then it resurge the ines. The jordon does not see the vanni.", "logic": "\nAcoustic(vanni)\nMauve(vanni)\nResurge(ines, jordon)\nnot Usurp(ines, vanni)\nUsurp(jordon, vanni)\nTurtle(jordon, vanni)\nTurtle(jordon, ines)\nforall x (Mauve(x) -> Turtle(x, vanni))\nforall x (Resurge(x, vanni) and Usurp(vanni, jordon) -> not Usurp(jordon, vanni))\nforall x (Turtle(x, vanni) -> Usurp(x, vanni))\nforall x (Resurge(x, jordon) and Congruous(jordon) -> Mauve(jordon))\nforall x (Turtle(x, jordon) and Usurp(jordon, vanni) -> Usurp(x, jordon))\nforall x (Tenderised(x) and not Acoustic(x) -> Usurp(x, jordon))\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Resurge(x, ines) -> Alopecic(ines))\nforall x (Acoustic(x) and Mauve(x) -> Resurge(x, ines))\n\nnot Usurp(jordon, vanni)\n\ntherefore Usurp(jordon, vanni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The griff is rheumatic. The griff is taurine. The zena repine the elvin. The zena does not see the griff. The elvin plop the griff. The elvin downsize the griff. The elvin downsize the zena. If something is taurine then it downsize the griff. If something repine the griff and the griff plop the elvin then the elvin does not see the griff. If something downsize the griff then it plop the griff. If something repine the elvin and the elvin is unimposing then the elvin is taurine. If something downsize the elvin and the elvin plop the griff then it plop the elvin. If something is exogenous and not rheumatic then it plop the elvin. If something is taurine and it repine the zena then the zena is faraway. If something is rheumatic and taurine then it repine the zena. The griff repine the zena.", "logic": "\nRheumatic(griff)\nTaurine(griff)\nRepine(zena, elvin)\nnot Plop(zena, griff)\nPlop(elvin, griff)\nDownsize(elvin, griff)\nDownsize(elvin, zena)\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Downsize(x, griff))\nforall x (Repine(x, griff) and Plop(griff, elvin) -> not Plop(elvin, griff))\nforall x (Downsize(x, griff) -> Plop(x, griff))\nforall x (Repine(x, elvin) and Unimposing(elvin) -> Taurine(elvin))\nforall x (Downsize(x, elvin) and Plop(elvin, griff) -> Plop(x, elvin))\nforall x (Exogenous(x) and not Rheumatic(x) -> Plop(x, elvin))\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Repine(x, zena) -> Faraway(zena))\nforall x (Rheumatic(x) and Taurine(x) -> Repine(x, zena))\n\nRepine(griff, zena)\n\nRheumatic(griff) and Taurine(griff) and forall x (Rheumatic(x) and Taurine(x) -> Repine(x, zena)) -> therefore Repine(griff, zena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The gera is unifilar. The gera is excrescent. The klarika tidy the justis. The klarika does not see the gera. The justis abominate the gera. The justis accent the gera. The justis accent the klarika. If something is excrescent then it accent the gera. If something tidy the gera and the gera abominate the justis then the justis does not see the gera. If something accent the gera then it abominate the gera. If something tidy the justis and the justis is ctenoid then the justis is excrescent. If something accent the justis and the justis abominate the gera then it abominate the justis. If something is bastardly and not unifilar then it abominate the justis. If something is excrescent and it tidy the klarika then the klarika is cuspidate. If something is unifilar and excrescent then it tidy the klarika. The gera does not need the klarika.", "logic": "\nUnifilar(gera)\nExcrescent(gera)\nTidy(klarika, justis)\nnot Abominate(klarika, gera)\nAbominate(justis, gera)\nAccent(justis, gera)\nAccent(justis, klarika)\nforall x (Excrescent(x) -> Accent(x, gera))\nforall x (Tidy(x, gera) and Abominate(gera, justis) -> not Abominate(justis, gera))\nforall x (Accent(x, gera) -> Abominate(x, gera))\nforall x (Tidy(x, justis) and Ctenoid(justis) -> Excrescent(justis))\nforall x (Accent(x, justis) and Abominate(justis, gera) -> Abominate(x, justis))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and not Unifilar(x) -> Abominate(x, justis))\nforall x (Excrescent(x) and Tidy(x, klarika) -> Cuspidate(klarika))\nforall x (Unifilar(x) and Excrescent(x) -> Tidy(x, klarika))\n\nnot Tidy(gera, klarika)\n\nUnifilar(gera) and Excrescent(gera) and forall x (Unifilar(x) and Excrescent(x) -> Tidy(x, klarika)) -> therefore Tidy(gera, klarika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The alf is bareback. The alf is congolese. The alissa dehumidify the emilio. The alissa does not see the alf. The emilio ramify the alf. The emilio sensualise the alf. The emilio sensualise the alissa. If something is congolese then it sensualise the alf. If something dehumidify the alf and the alf ramify the emilio then the emilio does not see the alf. If something sensualise the alf then it ramify the alf. If something dehumidify the emilio and the emilio is autogenous then the emilio is congolese. If something sensualise the emilio and the emilio ramify the alf then it ramify the emilio. If something is unexampled and not bareback then it ramify the emilio. If something is congolese and it dehumidify the alissa then the alissa is painterly. If something is bareback and congolese then it dehumidify the alissa. The alf ramify the alf.", "logic": "\nBareback(alf)\nCongolese(alf)\nDehumidify(alissa, emilio)\nnot Ramify(alissa, alf)\nRamify(emilio, alf)\nSensualise(emilio, alf)\nSensualise(emilio, alissa)\nforall x (Congolese(x) -> Sensualise(x, alf))\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, alf) and Ramify(alf, emilio) -> not Ramify(emilio, alf))\nforall x (Sensualise(x, alf) -> Ramify(x, alf))\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, emilio) and Autogenous(emilio) -> Congolese(emilio))\nforall x (Sensualise(x, emilio) and Ramify(emilio, alf) -> Ramify(x, emilio))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and not Bareback(x) -> Ramify(x, emilio))\nforall x (Congolese(x) and Dehumidify(x, alissa) -> Painterly(alissa))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Congolese(x) -> Dehumidify(x, alissa))\n\nRamify(alf, alf)\n\nCongolese(alf) and forall x (Congolese(x) -> Sensualise(x, alf)) -> therefore Sensualise(alf, alf) Sensualise(alf, alf) and forall x (Sensualise(x, alf) -> Ramify(x, alf)) -> therefore Ramify(alf, alf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The sioux is ocular. The sioux is ascendible. The natassia remain the remus. The natassia does not see the sioux. The remus raid the sioux. The remus record the sioux. The remus record the natassia. If something is ascendible then it record the sioux. If something remain the sioux and the sioux raid the remus then the remus does not see the sioux. If something record the sioux then it raid the sioux. If something remain the remus and the remus is capital then the remus is ascendible. If something record the remus and the remus raid the sioux then it raid the remus. If something is insincere and not ocular then it raid the remus. If something is ascendible and it remain the natassia then the natassia is giddy. If something is ocular and ascendible then it remain the natassia. The sioux does not see the sioux.", "logic": "\nOcular(sioux)\nAscendible(sioux)\nRemain(natassia, remus)\nnot Raid(natassia, sioux)\nRaid(remus, sioux)\nRecord(remus, sioux)\nRecord(remus, natassia)\nforall x (Ascendible(x) -> Record(x, sioux))\nforall x (Remain(x, sioux) and Raid(sioux, remus) -> not Raid(remus, sioux))\nforall x (Record(x, sioux) -> Raid(x, sioux))\nforall x (Remain(x, remus) and Capital(remus) -> Ascendible(remus))\nforall x (Record(x, remus) and Raid(remus, sioux) -> Raid(x, remus))\nforall x (Insincere(x) and not Ocular(x) -> Raid(x, remus))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) and Remain(x, natassia) -> Giddy(natassia))\nforall x (Ocular(x) and Ascendible(x) -> Remain(x, natassia))\n\nnot Raid(sioux, sioux)\n\nAscendible(sioux) and forall x (Ascendible(x) -> Record(x, sioux)) -> therefore Record(sioux, sioux) Record(sioux, sioux) and forall x (Record(x, sioux) -> Raid(x, sioux)) -> therefore Raid(sioux, sioux)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The renaldo is spiritless. The renaldo is apomictic. The faustina semaphore the evey. The faustina does not see the renaldo. The evey uncork the renaldo. The evey gesture the renaldo. The evey gesture the faustina. If something is apomictic then it gesture the renaldo. If something semaphore the renaldo and the renaldo uncork the evey then the evey does not see the renaldo. If something gesture the renaldo then it uncork the renaldo. If something semaphore the evey and the evey is mercurial then the evey is apomictic. If something gesture the evey and the evey uncork the renaldo then it uncork the evey. If something is detachable and not spiritless then it uncork the evey. If something is apomictic and it semaphore the faustina then the faustina is beardless. If something is spiritless and apomictic then it semaphore the faustina. The faustina does not need the faustina.", "logic": "\nSpiritless(renaldo)\nApomictic(renaldo)\nSemaphore(faustina, evey)\nnot Uncork(faustina, renaldo)\nUncork(evey, renaldo)\nGesture(evey, renaldo)\nGesture(evey, faustina)\nforall x (Apomictic(x) -> Gesture(x, renaldo))\nforall x (Semaphore(x, renaldo) and Uncork(renaldo, evey) -> not Uncork(evey, renaldo))\nforall x (Gesture(x, renaldo) -> Uncork(x, renaldo))\nforall x (Semaphore(x, evey) and Mercurial(evey) -> Apomictic(evey))\nforall x (Gesture(x, evey) and Uncork(evey, renaldo) -> Uncork(x, evey))\nforall x (Detachable(x) and not Spiritless(x) -> Uncork(x, evey))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) and Semaphore(x, faustina) -> Beardless(faustina))\nforall x (Spiritless(x) and Apomictic(x) -> Semaphore(x, faustina))\n\nnot Semaphore(faustina, faustina)\n\nforall x (Spiritless(x) and Apomictic(x) -> Semaphore(x, faustina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The victoria is etiologic. The victoria is glaucous. The jacinthe decolor the amara. The jacinthe does not see the victoria. The amara tweak the victoria. The amara fluoresce the victoria. The amara fluoresce the jacinthe. If something is glaucous then it fluoresce the victoria. If something decolor the victoria and the victoria tweak the amara then the amara does not see the victoria. If something fluoresce the victoria then it tweak the victoria. If something decolor the amara and the amara is obtuse then the amara is glaucous. If something fluoresce the amara and the amara tweak the victoria then it tweak the amara. If something is peristylar and not etiologic then it tweak the amara. If something is glaucous and it decolor the jacinthe then the jacinthe is vestal. If something is etiologic and glaucous then it decolor the jacinthe. The amara is glaucous.", "logic": "\nEtiologic(victoria)\nGlaucous(victoria)\nDecolor(jacinthe, amara)\nnot Tweak(jacinthe, victoria)\nTweak(amara, victoria)\nFluoresce(amara, victoria)\nFluoresce(amara, jacinthe)\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Fluoresce(x, victoria))\nforall x (Decolor(x, victoria) and Tweak(victoria, amara) -> not Tweak(amara, victoria))\nforall x (Fluoresce(x, victoria) -> Tweak(x, victoria))\nforall x (Decolor(x, amara) and Obtuse(amara) -> Glaucous(amara))\nforall x (Fluoresce(x, amara) and Tweak(amara, victoria) -> Tweak(x, amara))\nforall x (Peristylar(x) and not Etiologic(x) -> Tweak(x, amara))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) and Decolor(x, jacinthe) -> Vestal(jacinthe))\nforall x (Etiologic(x) and Glaucous(x) -> Decolor(x, jacinthe))\n\nGlaucous(amara)\n\nforall x (Decolor(x, amara) and Obtuse(amara) -> Glaucous(amara)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The darrick is postpartum. The darrick is median. The carie regularise the judi. The carie does not see the darrick. The judi squire the darrick. The judi congregate the darrick. The judi congregate the carie. If something is median then it congregate the darrick. If something regularise the darrick and the darrick squire the judi then the judi does not see the darrick. If something congregate the darrick then it squire the darrick. If something regularise the judi and the judi is lumbering then the judi is median. If something congregate the judi and the judi squire the darrick then it squire the judi. If something is neandertal and not postpartum then it squire the judi. If something is median and it regularise the carie then the carie is beetling. If something is postpartum and median then it regularise the carie. The carie does not see the judi.", "logic": "\nPostpartum(darrick)\nMedian(darrick)\nRegularise(carie, judi)\nnot Squire(carie, darrick)\nSquire(judi, darrick)\nCongregate(judi, darrick)\nCongregate(judi, carie)\nforall x (Median(x) -> Congregate(x, darrick))\nforall x (Regularise(x, darrick) and Squire(darrick, judi) -> not Squire(judi, darrick))\nforall x (Congregate(x, darrick) -> Squire(x, darrick))\nforall x (Regularise(x, judi) and Lumbering(judi) -> Median(judi))\nforall x (Congregate(x, judi) and Squire(judi, darrick) -> Squire(x, judi))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) and not Postpartum(x) -> Squire(x, judi))\nforall x (Median(x) and Regularise(x, carie) -> Beetling(carie))\nforall x (Postpartum(x) and Median(x) -> Regularise(x, carie))\n\nnot Squire(carie, judi)\n\nforall x (Congregate(x, judi) and Squire(judi, darrick) -> Squire(x, judi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The kaitlynn is outdoorsy. The kaitlynn is mucinous. The linea underspend the clara. The linea does not see the kaitlynn. The clara grind the kaitlynn. The clara sigh the kaitlynn. The clara sigh the linea. If something is mucinous then it sigh the kaitlynn. If something underspend the kaitlynn and the kaitlynn grind the clara then the clara does not see the kaitlynn. If something sigh the kaitlynn then it grind the kaitlynn. If something underspend the clara and the clara is fungous then the clara is mucinous. If something sigh the clara and the clara grind the kaitlynn then it grind the clara. If something is unneeded and not outdoorsy then it grind the clara. If something is mucinous and it underspend the linea then the linea is calcareous. If something is outdoorsy and mucinous then it underspend the linea. The clara is unneeded.", "logic": "\nOutdoorsy(kaitlynn)\nMucinous(kaitlynn)\nUnderspend(linea, clara)\nnot Grind(linea, kaitlynn)\nGrind(clara, kaitlynn)\nSigh(clara, kaitlynn)\nSigh(clara, linea)\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Sigh(x, kaitlynn))\nforall x (Underspend(x, kaitlynn) and Grind(kaitlynn, clara) -> not Grind(clara, kaitlynn))\nforall x (Sigh(x, kaitlynn) -> Grind(x, kaitlynn))\nforall x (Underspend(x, clara) and Fungous(clara) -> Mucinous(clara))\nforall x (Sigh(x, clara) and Grind(clara, kaitlynn) -> Grind(x, clara))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and not Outdoorsy(x) -> Grind(x, clara))\nforall x (Mucinous(x) and Underspend(x, linea) -> Calcareous(linea))\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) and Mucinous(x) -> Underspend(x, linea))\n\nUnneeded(clara)\n\nUnneeded(clara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The luisa is corrected. The luisa is becoming. The enid pussyfoot the cristy. The enid does not see the luisa. The cristy bottle the luisa. The cristy applaud the luisa. The cristy applaud the enid. If something is becoming then it applaud the luisa. If something pussyfoot the luisa and the luisa bottle the cristy then the cristy does not see the luisa. If something applaud the luisa then it bottle the luisa. If something pussyfoot the cristy and the cristy is assentient then the cristy is becoming. If something applaud the cristy and the cristy bottle the luisa then it bottle the cristy. If something is futureless and not corrected then it bottle the cristy. If something is becoming and it pussyfoot the enid then the enid is unshapely. If something is corrected and becoming then it pussyfoot the enid. The luisa does not see the enid.", "logic": "\nCorrected(luisa)\nBecoming(luisa)\nPussyfoot(enid, cristy)\nnot Bottle(enid, luisa)\nBottle(cristy, luisa)\nApplaud(cristy, luisa)\nApplaud(cristy, enid)\nforall x (Becoming(x) -> Applaud(x, luisa))\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, luisa) and Bottle(luisa, cristy) -> not Bottle(cristy, luisa))\nforall x (Applaud(x, luisa) -> Bottle(x, luisa))\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, cristy) and Assentient(cristy) -> Becoming(cristy))\nforall x (Applaud(x, cristy) and Bottle(cristy, luisa) -> Bottle(x, cristy))\nforall x (Futureless(x) and not Corrected(x) -> Bottle(x, cristy))\nforall x (Becoming(x) and Pussyfoot(x, enid) -> Unshapely(enid))\nforall x (Corrected(x) and Becoming(x) -> Pussyfoot(x, enid))\n\nnot Bottle(luisa, enid)\n\nnot Bottle(luisa, enid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The lilias is faced. The lilias is indiscrete. The francesca microwave the mandie. The francesca does not see the lilias. The mandie repine the lilias. The mandie delude the lilias. The mandie delude the francesca. If something is indiscrete then it delude the lilias. If something microwave the lilias and the lilias repine the mandie then the mandie does not see the lilias. If something delude the lilias then it repine the lilias. If something microwave the mandie and the mandie is shrimpy then the mandie is indiscrete. If something delude the mandie and the mandie repine the lilias then it repine the mandie. If something is bantu and not faced then it repine the mandie. If something is indiscrete and it microwave the francesca then the francesca is fuzzy. If something is faced and indiscrete then it microwave the francesca. The mandie is shrimpy.", "logic": "\nFaced(lilias)\nIndiscrete(lilias)\nMicrowave(francesca, mandie)\nnot Repine(francesca, lilias)\nRepine(mandie, lilias)\nDelude(mandie, lilias)\nDelude(mandie, francesca)\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) -> Delude(x, lilias))\nforall x (Microwave(x, lilias) and Repine(lilias, mandie) -> not Repine(mandie, lilias))\nforall x (Delude(x, lilias) -> Repine(x, lilias))\nforall x (Microwave(x, mandie) and Shrimpy(mandie) -> Indiscrete(mandie))\nforall x (Delude(x, mandie) and Repine(mandie, lilias) -> Repine(x, mandie))\nforall x (Bantu(x) and not Faced(x) -> Repine(x, mandie))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) and Microwave(x, francesca) -> Fuzzy(francesca))\nforall x (Faced(x) and Indiscrete(x) -> Microwave(x, francesca))\n\nShrimpy(mandie)\n\nShrimpy(mandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "Crista is woolly. Crista is syntactic. Lucia is imbecile. Lucia is randomised. Lucia is syntactic. Lucia is compulsive. Carmon is radiating. Carmon is imbecile. Carmon is syntactic. Carmon is compulsive. Nice things are radiating. If Crista is radiating then Crista is compulsive. Carmon is imbecile.", "logic": "\nWoolly(crista)\nSyntactic(crista)\nImbecile(lucia)\nRandomised(lucia)\nSyntactic(lucia)\nCompulsive(lucia)\nRadiating(carmon)\nImbecile(carmon)\nSyntactic(carmon)\nCompulsive(carmon)\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Radiating(x))\nRadiating(crista) -> Compulsive(crista)\n\nImbecile(carmon)\n\ntherefore Imbecile(carmon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Annabella is emphasized. Annabella is regimented. Obadiah is visored. Obadiah is paranoid. Obadiah is regimented. Obadiah is ignescent. Gayle is scraggly. Gayle is visored. Gayle is regimented. Gayle is ignescent. Nice things are scraggly. If Annabella is scraggly then Annabella is ignescent. Obadiah is not ignescent.", "logic": "\nEmphasized(annabella)\nRegimented(annabella)\nVisored(obadiah)\nParanoid(obadiah)\nRegimented(obadiah)\nIgnescent(obadiah)\nScraggly(gayle)\nVisored(gayle)\nRegimented(gayle)\nIgnescent(gayle)\nforall x (Emphasized(x) -> Scraggly(x))\nScraggly(annabella) -> Ignescent(annabella)\n\nnot Ignescent(obadiah)\n\ntherefore Ignescent(obadiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Kikelia is snotty. Kikelia is pasted. Edeline is cervine. Edeline is sewed. Edeline is pasted. Edeline is edentulous. Amery is plushy. Amery is cervine. Amery is pasted. Amery is edentulous. Nice things are plushy. If Kikelia is plushy then Kikelia is edentulous. Kikelia is plushy.", "logic": "\nSnotty(kikelia)\nPasted(kikelia)\nCervine(edeline)\nSewed(edeline)\nPasted(edeline)\nEdentulous(edeline)\nPlushy(amery)\nCervine(amery)\nPasted(amery)\nEdentulous(amery)\nforall x (Snotty(x) -> Plushy(x))\nPlushy(kikelia) -> Edentulous(kikelia)\n\nPlushy(kikelia)\n\nSnotty(kikelia) and forall x (Snotty(x) -> Plushy(x)) -> therefore Plushy(kikelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Becka is flawed. Becka is elfin. Giana is semestrial. Giana is provoking. Giana is elfin. Giana is evacuant. Eve is acetylenic. Eve is semestrial. Eve is elfin. Eve is evacuant. Nice things are acetylenic. If Becka is acetylenic then Becka is evacuant. Becka is not acetylenic.", "logic": "\nFlawed(becka)\nElfin(becka)\nSemestrial(giana)\nProvoking(giana)\nElfin(giana)\nEvacuant(giana)\nAcetylenic(eve)\nSemestrial(eve)\nElfin(eve)\nEvacuant(eve)\nforall x (Flawed(x) -> Acetylenic(x))\nAcetylenic(becka) -> Evacuant(becka)\n\nnot Acetylenic(becka)\n\nFlawed(becka) and forall x (Flawed(x) -> Acetylenic(x)) -> therefore Acetylenic(becka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Devi is zesty. Devi is sham. Redford is mellow. Redford is botanical. Redford is sham. Redford is emaciated. Nathaniel is huxleian. Nathaniel is mellow. Nathaniel is sham. Nathaniel is emaciated. Nice things are huxleian. If Devi is huxleian then Devi is emaciated. Devi is emaciated.", "logic": "\nZesty(devi)\nSham(devi)\nMellow(redford)\nBotanical(redford)\nSham(redford)\nEmaciated(redford)\nHuxleian(nathaniel)\nMellow(nathaniel)\nSham(nathaniel)\nEmaciated(nathaniel)\nforall x (Zesty(x) -> Huxleian(x))\nHuxleian(devi) -> Emaciated(devi)\n\nEmaciated(devi)\n\nZesty(devi) and forall x (Zesty(x) -> Huxleian(x)) -> therefore Huxleian(devi) Huxleian(devi) and Huxleian(devi) -> Emaciated(devi) -> therefore Emaciated(devi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Meagan is snoopy. Meagan is sandaled. Blaire is sundried. Blaire is weather. Blaire is sandaled. Blaire is obtainable. Adiana is sage. Adiana is sundried. Adiana is sandaled. Adiana is obtainable. Nice things are sage. If Meagan is sage then Meagan is obtainable. Meagan is not obtainable.", "logic": "\nSnoopy(meagan)\nSandaled(meagan)\nSundried(blaire)\nWeather(blaire)\nSandaled(blaire)\nObtainable(blaire)\nSage(adiana)\nSundried(adiana)\nSandaled(adiana)\nObtainable(adiana)\nforall x (Snoopy(x) -> Sage(x))\nSage(meagan) -> Obtainable(meagan)\n\nnot Obtainable(meagan)\n\nSnoopy(meagan) and forall x (Snoopy(x) -> Sage(x)) -> therefore Sage(meagan) Sage(meagan) and Sage(meagan) -> Obtainable(meagan) -> therefore Obtainable(meagan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Andrus is acute. Andrus is unwounded. Brandise is adjustive. Brandise is undomestic. Brandise is unwounded. Brandise is canty. Sandi is aeriferous. Sandi is adjustive. Sandi is unwounded. Sandi is canty. Nice things are aeriferous. If Andrus is aeriferous then Andrus is canty. Brandise is not aeriferous.", "logic": "\nAcute(andrus)\nUnwounded(andrus)\nAdjustive(brandise)\nUndomestic(brandise)\nUnwounded(brandise)\nCanty(brandise)\nAeriferous(sandi)\nAdjustive(sandi)\nUnwounded(sandi)\nCanty(sandi)\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nAeriferous(andrus) -> Canty(andrus)\n\nnot Aeriferous(brandise)\n\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Aeriferous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Husain is mirky. Husain is jubilant. Joaquin is unformed. Joaquin is ametabolic. Joaquin is jubilant. Joaquin is delighted. Neely is falling. Neely is unformed. Neely is jubilant. Neely is delighted. Nice things are falling. If Husain is falling then Husain is delighted. Neely is ametabolic.", "logic": "\nMirky(husain)\nJubilant(husain)\nUnformed(joaquin)\nAmetabolic(joaquin)\nJubilant(joaquin)\nDelighted(joaquin)\nFalling(neely)\nUnformed(neely)\nJubilant(neely)\nDelighted(neely)\nforall x (Mirky(x) -> Falling(x))\nFalling(husain) -> Delighted(husain)\n\nAmetabolic(neely)\n\nAmetabolic(neely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Denis is rentable. Denis is devout. Chriss is apical. Chriss is southeast. Chriss is devout. Chriss is wrathful. Webster is adulterate. Webster is apical. Webster is devout. Webster is wrathful. Nice things are adulterate. If Denis is adulterate then Denis is wrathful. Denis is not southeast.", "logic": "\nRentable(denis)\nDevout(denis)\nApical(chriss)\nSoutheast(chriss)\nDevout(chriss)\nWrathful(chriss)\nAdulterate(webster)\nApical(webster)\nDevout(webster)\nWrathful(webster)\nforall x (Rentable(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nAdulterate(denis) -> Wrathful(denis)\n\nnot Southeast(denis)\n\nnot Southeast(denis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Henrie is pointless. Henrie is voluted. Steffen is umbellate. Steffen is accessory. Steffen is voluted. Steffen is valued. Rosmunda is belted. Rosmunda is umbellate. Rosmunda is voluted. Rosmunda is valued. Nice things are belted. If Henrie is belted then Henrie is valued. Henrie is young.", "logic": "\nPointless(henrie)\nVoluted(henrie)\nUmbellate(steffen)\nAccessory(steffen)\nVoluted(steffen)\nValued(steffen)\nBelted(rosmunda)\nUmbellate(rosmunda)\nVoluted(rosmunda)\nValued(rosmunda)\nforall x (Pointless(x) -> Belted(x))\nBelted(henrie) -> Valued(henrie)\n\nYoung(henrie)\n\nYoung(henrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Mireielle is hidebound. Mireielle is mandatory. Mada is oldline. Mada is afebrile. Mada is mandatory. Mada is submersed. Jaleh is tailless. Jaleh is oldline. Jaleh is mandatory. Jaleh is submersed. Nice things are tailless. If Mireielle is tailless then Mireielle is submersed. Mireielle is not oldline.", "logic": "\nHidebound(mireielle)\nMandatory(mireielle)\nOldline(mada)\nAfebrile(mada)\nMandatory(mada)\nSubmersed(mada)\nTailless(jaleh)\nOldline(jaleh)\nMandatory(jaleh)\nSubmersed(jaleh)\nforall x (Hidebound(x) -> Tailless(x))\nTailless(mireielle) -> Submersed(mireielle)\n\nnot Oldline(mireielle)\n\nnot Oldline(mireielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "Jeannette is sheer. Jeannette is advised. Gusti is thickening. Gusti is laputan. Gusti is advised. Gusti is travelable. Grace is manic. Grace is thickening. Grace is advised. Grace is travelable. Nice things are manic. If Jeannette is manic then Jeannette is travelable. Gusti is young.", "logic": "\nSheer(jeannette)\nAdvised(jeannette)\nThickening(gusti)\nLaputan(gusti)\nAdvised(gusti)\nTravelable(gusti)\nManic(grace)\nThickening(grace)\nAdvised(grace)\nTravelable(grace)\nforall x (Sheer(x) -> Manic(x))\nManic(jeannette) -> Travelable(jeannette)\n\nYoung(gusti)\n\nYoung(gusti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1747"} {"premises": "The milicent does not eat the corenda. The madelyn is convolute. The corenda is atonal. The eveleen compliment the corenda. Round people are innovative. If someone compliment the milicent then they like the eveleen. If the corenda is innovative then the corenda clap the milicent. The milicent does not eat the corenda.", "logic": "\nnot Clap(milicent, corenda)\nConvolute(madelyn)\nAtonal(corenda)\nCompliment(eveleen, corenda)\nforall x (Atonal(x) -> Innovative(x))\nforall x (Compliment(x, milicent) -> Insufflate(x, eveleen))\nInnovative(corenda) -> Clap(corenda, milicent)\n\nnot Clap(milicent, corenda)\n\ntherefore not Clap(milicent, corenda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The thatcher does not eat the carolan. The rafaelia is banausic. The carolan is polynesian. The giacomo save the carolan. Round people are unlawful. If someone save the thatcher then they like the giacomo. If the carolan is unlawful then the carolan slither the thatcher. The giacomo does not need the carolan.", "logic": "\nnot Slither(thatcher, carolan)\nBanausic(rafaelia)\nPolynesian(carolan)\nSave(giacomo, carolan)\nforall x (Polynesian(x) -> Unlawful(x))\nforall x (Save(x, thatcher) -> Surpass(x, giacomo))\nUnlawful(carolan) -> Slither(carolan, thatcher)\n\nnot Save(giacomo, carolan)\n\ntherefore Save(giacomo, carolan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The ethan does not eat the sukey. The imelda is hydric. The sukey is febrile. The neille bestride the sukey. Round people are assiduous. If someone bestride the ethan then they like the neille. If the sukey is assiduous then the sukey effectuate the ethan. The sukey is assiduous.", "logic": "\nnot Effectuate(ethan, sukey)\nHydric(imelda)\nFebrile(sukey)\nBestride(neille, sukey)\nforall x (Febrile(x) -> Assiduous(x))\nforall x (Bestride(x, ethan) -> Enrich(x, neille))\nAssiduous(sukey) -> Effectuate(sukey, ethan)\n\nAssiduous(sukey)\n\nFebrile(sukey) and forall x (Febrile(x) -> Assiduous(x)) -> therefore Assiduous(sukey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The adora does not eat the julianna. The loni is amused. The julianna is hymenal. The darin conquer the julianna. Round people are stylistic. If someone conquer the adora then they like the darin. If the julianna is stylistic then the julianna chorus the adora. The julianna is not stylistic.", "logic": "\nnot Chorus(adora, julianna)\nAmused(loni)\nHymenal(julianna)\nConquer(darin, julianna)\nforall x (Hymenal(x) -> Stylistic(x))\nforall x (Conquer(x, adora) -> Crash(x, darin))\nStylistic(julianna) -> Chorus(julianna, adora)\n\nnot Stylistic(julianna)\n\nHymenal(julianna) and forall x (Hymenal(x) -> Stylistic(x)) -> therefore Stylistic(julianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The colin does not eat the marena. The willyt is funerary. The marena is phrasal. The camellia chew the marena. Round people are much. If someone chew the colin then they like the camellia. If the marena is much then the marena swindle the colin. The marena swindle the colin.", "logic": "\nnot Swindle(colin, marena)\nFunerary(willyt)\nPhrasal(marena)\nChew(camellia, marena)\nforall x (Phrasal(x) -> Much(x))\nforall x (Chew(x, colin) -> Actuate(x, camellia))\nMuch(marena) -> Swindle(marena, colin)\n\nSwindle(marena, colin)\n\nPhrasal(marena) and forall x (Phrasal(x) -> Much(x)) -> therefore Much(marena) Much(marena) and Much(marena) -> Swindle(marena, colin) -> therefore Swindle(marena, colin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The nichols does not eat the abbi. The sibyl is lilting. The abbi is enolic. The claretta attract the abbi. Round people are fattish. If someone attract the nichols then they like the claretta. If the abbi is fattish then the abbi aerosolise the nichols. The abbi does not eat the nichols.", "logic": "\nnot Aerosolise(nichols, abbi)\nLilting(sibyl)\nEnolic(abbi)\nAttract(claretta, abbi)\nforall x (Enolic(x) -> Fattish(x))\nforall x (Attract(x, nichols) -> Contribute(x, claretta))\nFattish(abbi) -> Aerosolise(abbi, nichols)\n\nnot Aerosolise(abbi, nichols)\n\nEnolic(abbi) and forall x (Enolic(x) -> Fattish(x)) -> therefore Fattish(abbi) Fattish(abbi) and Fattish(abbi) -> Aerosolise(abbi, nichols) -> therefore Aerosolise(abbi, nichols)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The tabbitha does not eat the mendel. The loni is recreant. The mendel is wistful. The quintilla footslog the mendel. Round people are trig. If someone footslog the tabbitha then they like the quintilla. If the mendel is trig then the mendel impair the tabbitha. The loni is not trig.", "logic": "\nnot Impair(tabbitha, mendel)\nRecreant(loni)\nWistful(mendel)\nFootslog(quintilla, mendel)\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Footslog(x, tabbitha) -> Joggle(x, quintilla))\nTrig(mendel) -> Impair(mendel, tabbitha)\n\nnot Trig(loni)\n\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Trig(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The ambrosi does not eat the rabbi. The rob is frowning. The rabbi is unranked. The sioux jostle the rabbi. Round people are dummy. If someone jostle the ambrosi then they like the sioux. If the rabbi is dummy then the rabbi quail the ambrosi. The ambrosi overawe the sioux.", "logic": "\nnot Quail(ambrosi, rabbi)\nFrowning(rob)\nUnranked(rabbi)\nJostle(sioux, rabbi)\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> Dummy(x))\nforall x (Jostle(x, ambrosi) -> Overawe(x, sioux))\nDummy(rabbi) -> Quail(rabbi, ambrosi)\n\nOverawe(ambrosi, sioux)\n\nforall x (Jostle(x, ambrosi) -> Overawe(x, sioux)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The jory does not eat the graig. The camellia is ungrasped. The graig is clockwise. The mavra vitrify the graig. Round people are contented. If someone vitrify the jory then they like the mavra. If the graig is contented then the graig copyread the jory. The camellia does not like the mavra.", "logic": "\nnot Copyread(jory, graig)\nUngrasped(camellia)\nClockwise(graig)\nVitrify(mavra, graig)\nforall x (Clockwise(x) -> Contented(x))\nforall x (Vitrify(x, jory) -> Debase(x, mavra))\nContented(graig) -> Copyread(graig, jory)\n\nnot Debase(camellia, mavra)\n\nforall x (Vitrify(x, jory) -> Debase(x, mavra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The ruthann does not eat the jarvis. The vivian is iniquitous. The jarvis is stupendous. The eloise predispose the jarvis. Round people are beat. If someone predispose the ruthann then they like the eloise. If the jarvis is beat then the jarvis caramelize the ruthann. The jarvis unhitch the jarvis.", "logic": "\nnot Caramelize(ruthann, jarvis)\nIniquitous(vivian)\nStupendous(jarvis)\nPredispose(eloise, jarvis)\nforall x (Stupendous(x) -> Beat(x))\nforall x (Predispose(x, ruthann) -> Unhitch(x, eloise))\nBeat(jarvis) -> Caramelize(jarvis, ruthann)\n\nUnhitch(jarvis, jarvis)\n\nUnhitch(jarvis, jarvis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The murdock does not eat the broddy. The moise is diabatic. The broddy is axonal. The willie overspread the broddy. Round people are cephalopod. If someone overspread the murdock then they like the willie. If the broddy is cephalopod then the broddy idolise the murdock. The broddy does not need the willie.", "logic": "\nnot Idolise(murdock, broddy)\nDiabatic(moise)\nAxonal(broddy)\nOverspread(willie, broddy)\nforall x (Axonal(x) -> Cephalopod(x))\nforall x (Overspread(x, murdock) -> Afford(x, willie))\nCephalopod(broddy) -> Idolise(broddy, murdock)\n\nnot Overspread(broddy, willie)\n\nnot Overspread(broddy, willie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "The matteo does not eat the eleni. The rik is kechuan. The eleni is minor. The caritta clutter the eleni. Round people are aeolian. If someone clutter the matteo then they like the caritta. If the eleni is aeolian then the eleni concrete the matteo. The rik concrete the eleni.", "logic": "\nnot Concrete(matteo, eleni)\nKechuan(rik)\nMinor(eleni)\nClutter(caritta, eleni)\nforall x (Minor(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Clutter(x, matteo) -> Duplex(x, caritta))\nAeolian(eleni) -> Concrete(eleni, matteo)\n\nConcrete(rik, eleni)\n\nConcrete(rik, eleni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-240"} {"premises": "Weider is waxed. Weider is ranked. Weider is unhealthy. Weider is citrous. Tymon is golden. Tymon is waxed. Tymon is vague. Tymon is ranked. Tymon is citrous. Annabelle is doubtful. Annabelle is golden. Annabelle is waxed. Annabelle is vague. Annabelle is ranked. Annabelle is unhealthy. Annabelle is citrous. All citrous things are doubtful. If Weider is doubtful then Weider is golden. Tymon is vague.", "logic": "\nWaxed(weider)\nRanked(weider)\nUnhealthy(weider)\nCitrous(weider)\nGolden(tymon)\nWaxed(tymon)\nVague(tymon)\nRanked(tymon)\nCitrous(tymon)\nDoubtful(annabelle)\nGolden(annabelle)\nWaxed(annabelle)\nVague(annabelle)\nRanked(annabelle)\nUnhealthy(annabelle)\nCitrous(annabelle)\nforall x (Citrous(x) -> Doubtful(x))\nDoubtful(weider) -> Golden(weider)\n\nVague(tymon)\n\ntherefore Vague(tymon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "Kirbee is dilettante. Kirbee is sober. Kirbee is toadyish. Kirbee is hornless. Pryce is middling. Pryce is dilettante. Pryce is listed. Pryce is sober. Pryce is hornless. Vlad is pyogenic. Vlad is middling. Vlad is dilettante. Vlad is listed. Vlad is sober. Vlad is toadyish. Vlad is hornless. All hornless things are pyogenic. If Kirbee is pyogenic then Kirbee is middling. Pryce is not middling.", "logic": "\nDilettante(kirbee)\nSober(kirbee)\nToadyish(kirbee)\nHornless(kirbee)\nMiddling(pryce)\nDilettante(pryce)\nListed(pryce)\nSober(pryce)\nHornless(pryce)\nPyogenic(vlad)\nMiddling(vlad)\nDilettante(vlad)\nListed(vlad)\nSober(vlad)\nToadyish(vlad)\nHornless(vlad)\nforall x (Hornless(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nPyogenic(kirbee) -> Middling(kirbee)\n\nnot Middling(pryce)\n\ntherefore Middling(pryce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "Evvy is unlimited. Evvy is obviating. Evvy is azimuthal. Evvy is anonymous. Ida is habitual. Ida is unlimited. Ida is equestrian. Ida is obviating. Ida is anonymous. Tiertza is lobar. Tiertza is habitual. Tiertza is unlimited. Tiertza is equestrian. Tiertza is obviating. Tiertza is azimuthal. Tiertza is anonymous. All anonymous things are lobar. If Evvy is lobar then Evvy is habitual. Ida is lobar.", "logic": "\nUnlimited(evvy)\nObviating(evvy)\nAzimuthal(evvy)\nAnonymous(evvy)\nHabitual(ida)\nUnlimited(ida)\nEquestrian(ida)\nObviating(ida)\nAnonymous(ida)\nLobar(tiertza)\nHabitual(tiertza)\nUnlimited(tiertza)\nEquestrian(tiertza)\nObviating(tiertza)\nAzimuthal(tiertza)\nAnonymous(tiertza)\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Lobar(x))\nLobar(evvy) -> Habitual(evvy)\n\nLobar(ida)\n\nAnonymous(ida) and forall x (Anonymous(x) -> Lobar(x)) -> therefore Lobar(ida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "Ricard is northeast. Ricard is annulate. Ricard is decreed. Ricard is incarnate. Marabel is lxxxv. Marabel is northeast. Marabel is twinning. Marabel is annulate. Marabel is incarnate. Tani is polite. Tani is lxxxv. Tani is northeast. Tani is twinning. Tani is annulate. Tani is decreed. Tani is incarnate. All incarnate things are polite. If Ricard is polite then Ricard is lxxxv. Ricard is not polite.", "logic": "\nNortheast(ricard)\nAnnulate(ricard)\nDecreed(ricard)\nIncarnate(ricard)\nLxxxv(marabel)\nNortheast(marabel)\nTwinning(marabel)\nAnnulate(marabel)\nIncarnate(marabel)\nPolite(tani)\nLxxxv(tani)\nNortheast(tani)\nTwinning(tani)\nAnnulate(tani)\nDecreed(tani)\nIncarnate(tani)\nforall x (Incarnate(x) -> Polite(x))\nPolite(ricard) -> Lxxxv(ricard)\n\nnot Polite(ricard)\n\nIncarnate(ricard) and forall x (Incarnate(x) -> Polite(x)) -> therefore Polite(ricard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "Parker is constant. Parker is coetaneous. Parker is unlettered. Parker is honorable. Catie is preachy. Catie is constant. Catie is slipping. Catie is coetaneous. Catie is honorable. Ariela is northwest. Ariela is preachy. Ariela is constant. Ariela is slipping. Ariela is coetaneous. Ariela is unlettered. Ariela is honorable. All honorable things are northwest. If Parker is northwest then Parker is preachy. Parker is preachy.", "logic": "\nConstant(parker)\nCoetaneous(parker)\nUnlettered(parker)\nHonorable(parker)\nPreachy(catie)\nConstant(catie)\nSlipping(catie)\nCoetaneous(catie)\nHonorable(catie)\nNorthwest(ariela)\nPreachy(ariela)\nConstant(ariela)\nSlipping(ariela)\nCoetaneous(ariela)\nUnlettered(ariela)\nHonorable(ariela)\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Northwest(x))\nNorthwest(parker) -> Preachy(parker)\n\nPreachy(parker)\n\nHonorable(parker) and forall x (Honorable(x) -> Northwest(x)) -> therefore Northwest(parker) Northwest(parker) and Northwest(parker) -> Preachy(parker) -> therefore Preachy(parker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "Mauritz is fourfold. Mauritz is cryptic. Mauritz is irenic. Mauritz is preteen. Kimmi is scraggy. Kimmi is fourfold. Kimmi is monogynic. Kimmi is cryptic. Kimmi is preteen. Caterina is diamantine. Caterina is scraggy. Caterina is fourfold. Caterina is monogynic. Caterina is cryptic. Caterina is irenic. Caterina is preteen. All preteen things are diamantine. If Mauritz is diamantine then Mauritz is scraggy. Mauritz is not scraggy.", "logic": "\nFourfold(mauritz)\nCryptic(mauritz)\nIrenic(mauritz)\nPreteen(mauritz)\nScraggy(kimmi)\nFourfold(kimmi)\nMonogynic(kimmi)\nCryptic(kimmi)\nPreteen(kimmi)\nDiamantine(caterina)\nScraggy(caterina)\nFourfold(caterina)\nMonogynic(caterina)\nCryptic(caterina)\nIrenic(caterina)\nPreteen(caterina)\nforall x (Preteen(x) -> Diamantine(x))\nDiamantine(mauritz) -> Scraggy(mauritz)\n\nnot Scraggy(mauritz)\n\nPreteen(mauritz) and forall x (Preteen(x) -> Diamantine(x)) -> therefore Diamantine(mauritz) Diamantine(mauritz) and Diamantine(mauritz) -> Scraggy(mauritz) -> therefore Scraggy(mauritz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "Darell is springlike. Darell is cherry. Darell is horizontal. Darell is perigonal. Ramsay is spasmodic. Ramsay is springlike. Ramsay is andean. Ramsay is cherry. Ramsay is perigonal. Ammamaria is condign. Ammamaria is spasmodic. Ammamaria is springlike. Ammamaria is andean. Ammamaria is cherry. Ammamaria is horizontal. Ammamaria is perigonal. All perigonal things are condign. If Darell is condign then Darell is spasmodic. Ramsay is not horizontal.", "logic": "\nSpringlike(darell)\nCherry(darell)\nHorizontal(darell)\nPerigonal(darell)\nSpasmodic(ramsay)\nSpringlike(ramsay)\nAndean(ramsay)\nCherry(ramsay)\nPerigonal(ramsay)\nCondign(ammamaria)\nSpasmodic(ammamaria)\nSpringlike(ammamaria)\nAndean(ammamaria)\nCherry(ammamaria)\nHorizontal(ammamaria)\nPerigonal(ammamaria)\nforall x (Perigonal(x) -> Condign(x))\nCondign(darell) -> Spasmodic(darell)\n\nnot Horizontal(ramsay)\n\nnot Horizontal(ramsay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "Stephanie is propitious. Stephanie is informed. Stephanie is neither. Stephanie is chopped. Marius is easygoing. Marius is propitious. Marius is erstwhile. Marius is informed. Marius is chopped. Gene is caesural. Gene is easygoing. Gene is propitious. Gene is erstwhile. Gene is informed. Gene is neither. Gene is chopped. All chopped things are caesural. If Stephanie is caesural then Stephanie is easygoing. Stephanie is erstwhile.", "logic": "\nPropitious(stephanie)\nInformed(stephanie)\nNeither(stephanie)\nChopped(stephanie)\nEasygoing(marius)\nPropitious(marius)\nErstwhile(marius)\nInformed(marius)\nChopped(marius)\nCaesural(gene)\nEasygoing(gene)\nPropitious(gene)\nErstwhile(gene)\nInformed(gene)\nNeither(gene)\nChopped(gene)\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Caesural(x))\nCaesural(stephanie) -> Easygoing(stephanie)\n\nErstwhile(stephanie)\n\nErstwhile(stephanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-398"} {"premises": "The seline trace the gustav. The seline is unbloody. The seline is tenuous. The seline is muzzy. The seline plead the gustav. The seline disfavour the gustav. The gustav trace the seline. The gustav is unbloody. The gustav is pyrogenous. The gustav is muzzy. The gustav plead the seline. The gustav disfavour the seline. If something disfavour the seline then it is skim. If something disfavour the gustav then it trace the seline. If something is tenuous then it plead the gustav. If something is unbloody and it disfavour the gustav then it disfavour the seline. If something is skim and it trace the gustav then it is muzzy. If something disfavour the seline then it plead the gustav. The seline is unbloody.", "logic": "\nTrace(seline, gustav)\nUnbloody(seline)\nTenuous(seline)\nMuzzy(seline)\nPlead(seline, gustav)\nDisfavour(seline, gustav)\nTrace(gustav, seline)\nUnbloody(gustav)\nPyrogenous(gustav)\nMuzzy(gustav)\nPlead(gustav, seline)\nDisfavour(gustav, seline)\nforall x (Disfavour(x, seline) -> Skim(x))\nforall x (Disfavour(x, gustav) -> Trace(x, seline))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Plead(x, gustav))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Disfavour(x, gustav) -> Disfavour(x, seline))\nforall x (Skim(x) and Trace(x, gustav) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Disfavour(x, seline) -> Plead(x, gustav))\n\nUnbloody(seline)\n\ntherefore Unbloody(seline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The mabelle proffer the meara. The mabelle is palatable. The mabelle is yeastlike. The mabelle is calced. The mabelle recopy the meara. The mabelle deform the meara. The meara proffer the mabelle. The meara is palatable. The meara is tutorial. The meara is calced. The meara recopy the mabelle. The meara deform the mabelle. If something deform the mabelle then it is austral. If something deform the meara then it proffer the mabelle. If something is yeastlike then it recopy the meara. If something is palatable and it deform the meara then it deform the mabelle. If something is austral and it proffer the meara then it is calced. If something deform the mabelle then it recopy the meara. The meara is not calced.", "logic": "\nProffer(mabelle, meara)\nPalatable(mabelle)\nYeastlike(mabelle)\nCalced(mabelle)\nRecopy(mabelle, meara)\nDeform(mabelle, meara)\nProffer(meara, mabelle)\nPalatable(meara)\nTutorial(meara)\nCalced(meara)\nRecopy(meara, mabelle)\nDeform(meara, mabelle)\nforall x (Deform(x, mabelle) -> Austral(x))\nforall x (Deform(x, meara) -> Proffer(x, mabelle))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Recopy(x, meara))\nforall x (Palatable(x) and Deform(x, meara) -> Deform(x, mabelle))\nforall x (Austral(x) and Proffer(x, meara) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Deform(x, mabelle) -> Recopy(x, meara))\n\nnot Calced(meara)\n\ntherefore Calced(meara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The marlon carnalize the marcello. The marlon is pneumatic. The marlon is connected. The marlon is swanky. The marlon eternalise the marcello. The marlon gargle the marcello. The marcello carnalize the marlon. The marcello is pneumatic. The marcello is petaled. The marcello is swanky. The marcello eternalise the marlon. The marcello gargle the marlon. If something gargle the marlon then it is undersexed. If something gargle the marcello then it carnalize the marlon. If something is connected then it eternalise the marcello. If something is pneumatic and it gargle the marcello then it gargle the marlon. If something is undersexed and it carnalize the marcello then it is swanky. If something gargle the marlon then it eternalise the marcello. The marlon gargle the marlon.", "logic": "\nCarnalize(marlon, marcello)\nPneumatic(marlon)\nConnected(marlon)\nSwanky(marlon)\nEternalise(marlon, marcello)\nGargle(marlon, marcello)\nCarnalize(marcello, marlon)\nPneumatic(marcello)\nPetaled(marcello)\nSwanky(marcello)\nEternalise(marcello, marlon)\nGargle(marcello, marlon)\nforall x (Gargle(x, marlon) -> Undersexed(x))\nforall x (Gargle(x, marcello) -> Carnalize(x, marlon))\nforall x (Connected(x) -> Eternalise(x, marcello))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Gargle(x, marcello) -> Gargle(x, marlon))\nforall x (Undersexed(x) and Carnalize(x, marcello) -> Swanky(x))\nforall x (Gargle(x, marlon) -> Eternalise(x, marcello))\n\nGargle(marlon, marlon)\n\nPneumatic(marlon) and Gargle(marlon, marcello) and forall x (Pneumatic(x) and Gargle(x, marcello) -> Gargle(x, marlon)) -> therefore Gargle(marlon, marlon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The see pother the godfrey. The see is iliac. The see is diestrual. The see is soppy. The see opalise the godfrey. The see rotate the godfrey. The godfrey pother the see. The godfrey is iliac. The godfrey is modernised. The godfrey is soppy. The godfrey opalise the see. The godfrey rotate the see. If something rotate the see then it is lossy. If something rotate the godfrey then it pother the see. If something is diestrual then it opalise the godfrey. If something is iliac and it rotate the godfrey then it rotate the see. If something is lossy and it pother the godfrey then it is soppy. If something rotate the see then it opalise the godfrey. The see does not eat the see.", "logic": "\nPother(see, godfrey)\nIliac(see)\nDiestrual(see)\nSoppy(see)\nOpalise(see, godfrey)\nRotate(see, godfrey)\nPother(godfrey, see)\nIliac(godfrey)\nModernised(godfrey)\nSoppy(godfrey)\nOpalise(godfrey, see)\nRotate(godfrey, see)\nforall x (Rotate(x, see) -> Lossy(x))\nforall x (Rotate(x, godfrey) -> Pother(x, see))\nforall x (Diestrual(x) -> Opalise(x, godfrey))\nforall x (Iliac(x) and Rotate(x, godfrey) -> Rotate(x, see))\nforall x (Lossy(x) and Pother(x, godfrey) -> Soppy(x))\nforall x (Rotate(x, see) -> Opalise(x, godfrey))\n\nnot Pother(see, see)\n\nRotate(see, godfrey) and forall x (Rotate(x, godfrey) -> Pother(x, see)) -> therefore Pother(see, see)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The ofelia literalize the katinka. The ofelia is botchy. The ofelia is different. The ofelia is lettered. The ofelia censure the katinka. The ofelia modernise the katinka. The katinka literalize the ofelia. The katinka is botchy. The katinka is stomachic. The katinka is lettered. The katinka censure the ofelia. The katinka modernise the ofelia. If something modernise the ofelia then it is livelong. If something modernise the katinka then it literalize the ofelia. If something is different then it censure the katinka. If something is botchy and it modernise the katinka then it modernise the ofelia. If something is livelong and it literalize the katinka then it is lettered. If something modernise the ofelia then it censure the katinka. The ofelia is livelong.", "logic": "\nLiteralize(ofelia, katinka)\nBotchy(ofelia)\nDifferent(ofelia)\nLettered(ofelia)\nCensure(ofelia, katinka)\nModernise(ofelia, katinka)\nLiteralize(katinka, ofelia)\nBotchy(katinka)\nStomachic(katinka)\nLettered(katinka)\nCensure(katinka, ofelia)\nModernise(katinka, ofelia)\nforall x (Modernise(x, ofelia) -> Livelong(x))\nforall x (Modernise(x, katinka) -> Literalize(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Different(x) -> Censure(x, katinka))\nforall x (Botchy(x) and Modernise(x, katinka) -> Modernise(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and Literalize(x, katinka) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Modernise(x, ofelia) -> Censure(x, katinka))\n\nLivelong(ofelia)\n\nBotchy(ofelia) and Modernise(ofelia, katinka) and forall x (Botchy(x) and Modernise(x, katinka) -> Modernise(x, ofelia)) -> therefore Modernise(ofelia, ofelia) Modernise(ofelia, ofelia) and forall x (Modernise(x, ofelia) -> Livelong(x)) -> therefore Livelong(ofelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The parnell premise the mattie. The parnell is seamanly. The parnell is cyclonical. The parnell is turbaned. The parnell hotfoot the mattie. The parnell ratchet the mattie. The mattie premise the parnell. The mattie is seamanly. The mattie is available. The mattie is turbaned. The mattie hotfoot the parnell. The mattie ratchet the parnell. If something ratchet the parnell then it is curative. If something ratchet the mattie then it premise the parnell. If something is cyclonical then it hotfoot the mattie. If something is seamanly and it ratchet the mattie then it ratchet the parnell. If something is curative and it premise the mattie then it is turbaned. If something ratchet the parnell then it hotfoot the mattie. The parnell is not curative.", "logic": "\nPremise(parnell, mattie)\nSeamanly(parnell)\nCyclonical(parnell)\nTurbaned(parnell)\nHotfoot(parnell, mattie)\nRatchet(parnell, mattie)\nPremise(mattie, parnell)\nSeamanly(mattie)\nAvailable(mattie)\nTurbaned(mattie)\nHotfoot(mattie, parnell)\nRatchet(mattie, parnell)\nforall x (Ratchet(x, parnell) -> Curative(x))\nforall x (Ratchet(x, mattie) -> Premise(x, parnell))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) -> Hotfoot(x, mattie))\nforall x (Seamanly(x) and Ratchet(x, mattie) -> Ratchet(x, parnell))\nforall x (Curative(x) and Premise(x, mattie) -> Turbaned(x))\nforall x (Ratchet(x, parnell) -> Hotfoot(x, mattie))\n\nnot Curative(parnell)\n\nSeamanly(parnell) and Ratchet(parnell, mattie) and forall x (Seamanly(x) and Ratchet(x, mattie) -> Ratchet(x, parnell)) -> therefore Ratchet(parnell, parnell) Ratchet(parnell, parnell) and forall x (Ratchet(x, parnell) -> Curative(x)) -> therefore Curative(parnell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The lyndsay play the margi. The lyndsay is spoilt. The lyndsay is hermitic. The lyndsay is headlong. The lyndsay cake the margi. The lyndsay welcome the margi. The margi play the lyndsay. The margi is spoilt. The margi is juridic. The margi is headlong. The margi cake the lyndsay. The margi welcome the lyndsay. If something welcome the lyndsay then it is fourpenny. If something welcome the margi then it play the lyndsay. If something is hermitic then it cake the margi. If something is spoilt and it welcome the margi then it welcome the lyndsay. If something is fourpenny and it play the margi then it is headlong. If something welcome the lyndsay then it cake the margi. The margi does not visit the margi.", "logic": "\nPlay(lyndsay, margi)\nSpoilt(lyndsay)\nHermitic(lyndsay)\nHeadlong(lyndsay)\nCake(lyndsay, margi)\nWelcome(lyndsay, margi)\nPlay(margi, lyndsay)\nSpoilt(margi)\nJuridic(margi)\nHeadlong(margi)\nCake(margi, lyndsay)\nWelcome(margi, lyndsay)\nforall x (Welcome(x, lyndsay) -> Fourpenny(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x, margi) -> Play(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Hermitic(x) -> Cake(x, margi))\nforall x (Spoilt(x) and Welcome(x, margi) -> Welcome(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) and Play(x, margi) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x, lyndsay) -> Cake(x, margi))\n\nnot Welcome(margi, margi)\n\nnot Welcome(margi, margi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The karoline notate the randy. The karoline is astatic. The karoline is chian. The karoline is oncologic. The karoline overprint the randy. The karoline preordain the randy. The randy notate the karoline. The randy is astatic. The randy is talentless. The randy is oncologic. The randy overprint the karoline. The randy preordain the karoline. If something preordain the karoline then it is untrod. If something preordain the randy then it notate the karoline. If something is chian then it overprint the randy. If something is astatic and it preordain the randy then it preordain the karoline. If something is untrod and it notate the randy then it is oncologic. If something preordain the karoline then it overprint the randy. The randy is chian.", "logic": "\nNotate(karoline, randy)\nAstatic(karoline)\nChian(karoline)\nOncologic(karoline)\nOverprint(karoline, randy)\nPreordain(karoline, randy)\nNotate(randy, karoline)\nAstatic(randy)\nTalentless(randy)\nOncologic(randy)\nOverprint(randy, karoline)\nPreordain(randy, karoline)\nforall x (Preordain(x, karoline) -> Untrod(x))\nforall x (Preordain(x, randy) -> Notate(x, karoline))\nforall x (Chian(x) -> Overprint(x, randy))\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Preordain(x, randy) -> Preordain(x, karoline))\nforall x (Untrod(x) and Notate(x, randy) -> Oncologic(x))\nforall x (Preordain(x, karoline) -> Overprint(x, randy))\n\nChian(randy)\n\nChian(randy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The wolfy betide the yelena. The wolfy is accessible. The wolfy is unneeded. The wolfy is casual. The wolfy nutate the yelena. The wolfy foredate the yelena. The yelena betide the wolfy. The yelena is accessible. The yelena is russian. The yelena is casual. The yelena nutate the wolfy. The yelena foredate the wolfy. If something foredate the wolfy then it is festive. If something foredate the yelena then it betide the wolfy. If something is unneeded then it nutate the yelena. If something is accessible and it foredate the yelena then it foredate the wolfy. If something is festive and it betide the yelena then it is casual. If something foredate the wolfy then it nutate the yelena. The wolfy is not russian.", "logic": "\nBetide(wolfy, yelena)\nAccessible(wolfy)\nUnneeded(wolfy)\nCasual(wolfy)\nNutate(wolfy, yelena)\nForedate(wolfy, yelena)\nBetide(yelena, wolfy)\nAccessible(yelena)\nRussian(yelena)\nCasual(yelena)\nNutate(yelena, wolfy)\nForedate(yelena, wolfy)\nforall x (Foredate(x, wolfy) -> Festive(x))\nforall x (Foredate(x, yelena) -> Betide(x, wolfy))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> Nutate(x, yelena))\nforall x (Accessible(x) and Foredate(x, yelena) -> Foredate(x, wolfy))\nforall x (Festive(x) and Betide(x, yelena) -> Casual(x))\nforall x (Foredate(x, wolfy) -> Nutate(x, yelena))\n\nnot Russian(wolfy)\n\nnot Russian(wolfy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The allan hear the baxter. The allan is unmilitary. The allan is vatical. The allan is tardive. The allan thatch the baxter. The allan exclaim the baxter. The baxter hear the allan. The baxter is unmilitary. The baxter is rarified. The baxter is tardive. The baxter thatch the allan. The baxter exclaim the allan. If something exclaim the allan then it is friable. If something exclaim the baxter then it hear the allan. If something is vatical then it thatch the baxter. If something is unmilitary and it exclaim the baxter then it exclaim the allan. If something is friable and it hear the baxter then it is tardive. If something exclaim the allan then it thatch the baxter. The baxter hear the baxter.", "logic": "\nHear(allan, baxter)\nUnmilitary(allan)\nVatical(allan)\nTardive(allan)\nThatch(allan, baxter)\nExclaim(allan, baxter)\nHear(baxter, allan)\nUnmilitary(baxter)\nRarified(baxter)\nTardive(baxter)\nThatch(baxter, allan)\nExclaim(baxter, allan)\nforall x (Exclaim(x, allan) -> Friable(x))\nforall x (Exclaim(x, baxter) -> Hear(x, allan))\nforall x (Vatical(x) -> Thatch(x, baxter))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Exclaim(x, baxter) -> Exclaim(x, allan))\nforall x (Friable(x) and Hear(x, baxter) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Exclaim(x, allan) -> Thatch(x, baxter))\n\nHear(baxter, baxter)\n\nHear(baxter, baxter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "The mattie pester the ehud. The mattie is downscale. The mattie is cervical. The mattie compact the ehud. The mattie unhorse the celene. The celene pester the ehud. The celene is inaccurate. The celene unhorse the ehud. The ehud pester the mattie. The ehud pester the celene. The ehud is cervical. The ehud unhorse the celene. If something is downscale then it compact the mattie. If something compact the mattie and it compact the ehud then the mattie pester the celene. The celene is inaccurate.", "logic": "\nPester(mattie, ehud)\nDownscale(mattie)\nCervical(mattie)\nCompact(mattie, ehud)\nUnhorse(mattie, celene)\nPester(celene, ehud)\nInaccurate(celene)\nUnhorse(celene, ehud)\nPester(ehud, mattie)\nPester(ehud, celene)\nCervical(ehud)\nUnhorse(ehud, celene)\nforall x (Downscale(x) -> Compact(x, mattie))\nforall x (Compact(x, mattie) and Compact(x, ehud) -> Pester(mattie, celene))\n\nInaccurate(celene)\n\ntherefore Inaccurate(celene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The zippy jactitate the lynette. The zippy is nutty. The zippy is ripping. The zippy trickle the lynette. The zippy liquify the julissa. The julissa jactitate the lynette. The julissa is arthurian. The julissa liquify the lynette. The lynette jactitate the zippy. The lynette jactitate the julissa. The lynette is ripping. The lynette liquify the julissa. If something is nutty then it trickle the zippy. If something trickle the zippy and it trickle the lynette then the zippy jactitate the julissa. The lynette does not chase the julissa.", "logic": "\nJactitate(zippy, lynette)\nNutty(zippy)\nRipping(zippy)\nTrickle(zippy, lynette)\nLiquify(zippy, julissa)\nJactitate(julissa, lynette)\nArthurian(julissa)\nLiquify(julissa, lynette)\nJactitate(lynette, zippy)\nJactitate(lynette, julissa)\nRipping(lynette)\nLiquify(lynette, julissa)\nforall x (Nutty(x) -> Trickle(x, zippy))\nforall x (Trickle(x, zippy) and Trickle(x, lynette) -> Jactitate(zippy, julissa))\n\nnot Jactitate(lynette, julissa)\n\ntherefore Jactitate(lynette, julissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The nancey monger the harland. The nancey is restrained. The nancey is philippine. The nancey obscure the harland. The nancey equivocate the stirling. The stirling monger the harland. The stirling is bellying. The stirling equivocate the harland. The harland monger the nancey. The harland monger the stirling. The harland is philippine. The harland equivocate the stirling. If something is restrained then it obscure the nancey. If something obscure the nancey and it obscure the harland then the nancey monger the stirling. The nancey obscure the nancey.", "logic": "\nMonger(nancey, harland)\nRestrained(nancey)\nPhilippine(nancey)\nObscure(nancey, harland)\nEquivocate(nancey, stirling)\nMonger(stirling, harland)\nBellying(stirling)\nEquivocate(stirling, harland)\nMonger(harland, nancey)\nMonger(harland, stirling)\nPhilippine(harland)\nEquivocate(harland, stirling)\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Obscure(x, nancey))\nforall x (Obscure(x, nancey) and Obscure(x, harland) -> Monger(nancey, stirling))\n\nObscure(nancey, nancey)\n\nRestrained(nancey) and forall x (Restrained(x) -> Obscure(x, nancey)) -> therefore Obscure(nancey, nancey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The shoshanna crop the helmuth. The shoshanna is thinking. The shoshanna is unassured. The shoshanna sprawl the helmuth. The shoshanna snuffle the ursala. The ursala crop the helmuth. The ursala is incan. The ursala snuffle the helmuth. The helmuth crop the shoshanna. The helmuth crop the ursala. The helmuth is unassured. The helmuth snuffle the ursala. If something is thinking then it sprawl the shoshanna. If something sprawl the shoshanna and it sprawl the helmuth then the shoshanna crop the ursala. The shoshanna does not like the shoshanna.", "logic": "\nCrop(shoshanna, helmuth)\nThinking(shoshanna)\nUnassured(shoshanna)\nSprawl(shoshanna, helmuth)\nSnuffle(shoshanna, ursala)\nCrop(ursala, helmuth)\nIncan(ursala)\nSnuffle(ursala, helmuth)\nCrop(helmuth, shoshanna)\nCrop(helmuth, ursala)\nUnassured(helmuth)\nSnuffle(helmuth, ursala)\nforall x (Thinking(x) -> Sprawl(x, shoshanna))\nforall x (Sprawl(x, shoshanna) and Sprawl(x, helmuth) -> Crop(shoshanna, ursala))\n\nnot Sprawl(shoshanna, shoshanna)\n\nThinking(shoshanna) and forall x (Thinking(x) -> Sprawl(x, shoshanna)) -> therefore Sprawl(shoshanna, shoshanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The geeta choke the jerrome. The geeta is rousseauan. The geeta is authorial. The geeta okay the jerrome. The geeta host the tiffanie. The tiffanie choke the jerrome. The tiffanie is subscribed. The tiffanie host the jerrome. The jerrome choke the geeta. The jerrome choke the tiffanie. The jerrome is authorial. The jerrome host the tiffanie. If something is rousseauan then it okay the geeta. If something okay the geeta and it okay the jerrome then the geeta choke the tiffanie. The geeta choke the tiffanie.", "logic": "\nChoke(geeta, jerrome)\nRousseauan(geeta)\nAuthorial(geeta)\nOkay(geeta, jerrome)\nHost(geeta, tiffanie)\nChoke(tiffanie, jerrome)\nSubscribed(tiffanie)\nHost(tiffanie, jerrome)\nChoke(jerrome, geeta)\nChoke(jerrome, tiffanie)\nAuthorial(jerrome)\nHost(jerrome, tiffanie)\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Okay(x, geeta))\nforall x (Okay(x, geeta) and Okay(x, jerrome) -> Choke(geeta, tiffanie))\n\nChoke(geeta, tiffanie)\n\nRousseauan(geeta) and forall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Okay(x, geeta)) -> therefore Okay(geeta, geeta) Okay(geeta, geeta) and Okay(geeta, jerrome) and forall x (Okay(x, geeta) and Okay(x, jerrome) -> Choke(geeta, tiffanie)) -> therefore Choke(geeta, tiffanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The meggan rectify the juan. The meggan is venerating. The meggan is inutile. The meggan ransack the juan. The meggan overwinter the moselle. The moselle rectify the juan. The moselle is moldy. The moselle overwinter the juan. The juan rectify the meggan. The juan rectify the moselle. The juan is inutile. The juan overwinter the moselle. If something is venerating then it ransack the meggan. If something ransack the meggan and it ransack the juan then the meggan rectify the moselle. The meggan does not chase the moselle.", "logic": "\nRectify(meggan, juan)\nVenerating(meggan)\nInutile(meggan)\nRansack(meggan, juan)\nOverwinter(meggan, moselle)\nRectify(moselle, juan)\nMoldy(moselle)\nOverwinter(moselle, juan)\nRectify(juan, meggan)\nRectify(juan, moselle)\nInutile(juan)\nOverwinter(juan, moselle)\nforall x (Venerating(x) -> Ransack(x, meggan))\nforall x (Ransack(x, meggan) and Ransack(x, juan) -> Rectify(meggan, moselle))\n\nnot Rectify(meggan, moselle)\n\nVenerating(meggan) and forall x (Venerating(x) -> Ransack(x, meggan)) -> therefore Ransack(meggan, meggan) Ransack(meggan, meggan) and Ransack(meggan, juan) and forall x (Ransack(x, meggan) and Ransack(x, juan) -> Rectify(meggan, moselle)) -> therefore Rectify(meggan, moselle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The felicia surround the lesli. The felicia is mistreated. The felicia is horrifying. The felicia strengthen the lesli. The felicia crimson the mona. The mona surround the lesli. The mona is erosive. The mona crimson the lesli. The lesli surround the felicia. The lesli surround the mona. The lesli is horrifying. The lesli crimson the mona. If something is mistreated then it strengthen the felicia. If something strengthen the felicia and it strengthen the lesli then the felicia surround the mona. The lesli does not like the felicia.", "logic": "\nSurround(felicia, lesli)\nMistreated(felicia)\nHorrifying(felicia)\nStrengthen(felicia, lesli)\nCrimson(felicia, mona)\nSurround(mona, lesli)\nErosive(mona)\nCrimson(mona, lesli)\nSurround(lesli, felicia)\nSurround(lesli, mona)\nHorrifying(lesli)\nCrimson(lesli, mona)\nforall x (Mistreated(x) -> Strengthen(x, felicia))\nforall x (Strengthen(x, felicia) and Strengthen(x, lesli) -> Surround(felicia, mona))\n\nnot Strengthen(lesli, felicia)\n\nforall x (Mistreated(x) -> Strengthen(x, felicia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The bernadene teem the eleanor. The bernadene is sneaky. The bernadene is curt. The bernadene mulct the eleanor. The bernadene bogey the albina. The albina teem the eleanor. The albina is modern. The albina bogey the eleanor. The eleanor teem the bernadene. The eleanor teem the albina. The eleanor is curt. The eleanor bogey the albina. If something is sneaky then it mulct the bernadene. If something mulct the bernadene and it mulct the eleanor then the bernadene teem the albina. The albina mulct the bernadene.", "logic": "\nTeem(bernadene, eleanor)\nSneaky(bernadene)\nCurt(bernadene)\nMulct(bernadene, eleanor)\nBogey(bernadene, albina)\nTeem(albina, eleanor)\nModern(albina)\nBogey(albina, eleanor)\nTeem(eleanor, bernadene)\nTeem(eleanor, albina)\nCurt(eleanor)\nBogey(eleanor, albina)\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Mulct(x, bernadene))\nforall x (Mulct(x, bernadene) and Mulct(x, eleanor) -> Teem(bernadene, albina))\n\nMulct(albina, bernadene)\n\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Mulct(x, bernadene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The rayner jive the talbert. The rayner is metalloid. The rayner is asteroid. The rayner brainstorm the talbert. The rayner gaol the giana. The giana jive the talbert. The giana is amethyst. The giana gaol the talbert. The talbert jive the rayner. The talbert jive the giana. The talbert is asteroid. The talbert gaol the giana. If something is metalloid then it brainstorm the rayner. If something brainstorm the rayner and it brainstorm the talbert then the rayner jive the giana. The giana does not see the rayner.", "logic": "\nJive(rayner, talbert)\nMetalloid(rayner)\nAsteroid(rayner)\nBrainstorm(rayner, talbert)\nGaol(rayner, giana)\nJive(giana, talbert)\nAmethyst(giana)\nGaol(giana, talbert)\nJive(talbert, rayner)\nJive(talbert, giana)\nAsteroid(talbert)\nGaol(talbert, giana)\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Brainstorm(x, rayner))\nforall x (Brainstorm(x, rayner) and Brainstorm(x, talbert) -> Jive(rayner, giana))\n\nnot Gaol(giana, rayner)\n\nnot Gaol(giana, rayner) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The lonee weed the seth. The lonee is bistred. The lonee is flavourful. The lonee discommode the seth. The lonee pulse the mervin. The mervin weed the seth. The mervin is citywide. The mervin pulse the seth. The seth weed the lonee. The seth weed the mervin. The seth is flavourful. The seth pulse the mervin. If something is bistred then it discommode the lonee. If something discommode the lonee and it discommode the seth then the lonee weed the mervin. The mervin is bistred.", "logic": "\nWeed(lonee, seth)\nBistred(lonee)\nFlavourful(lonee)\nDiscommode(lonee, seth)\nPulse(lonee, mervin)\nWeed(mervin, seth)\nCitywide(mervin)\nPulse(mervin, seth)\nWeed(seth, lonee)\nWeed(seth, mervin)\nFlavourful(seth)\nPulse(seth, mervin)\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> Discommode(x, lonee))\nforall x (Discommode(x, lonee) and Discommode(x, seth) -> Weed(lonee, mervin))\n\nBistred(mervin)\n\nBistred(mervin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The rosemary spike the con. The rosemary is inviolable. The rosemary is acanthotic. The rosemary flourish the con. The rosemary detox the osmond. The osmond spike the con. The osmond is inculpable. The osmond detox the con. The con spike the rosemary. The con spike the osmond. The con is acanthotic. The con detox the osmond. If something is inviolable then it flourish the rosemary. If something flourish the rosemary and it flourish the con then the rosemary spike the osmond. The rosemary is not blue.", "logic": "\nSpike(rosemary, con)\nInviolable(rosemary)\nAcanthotic(rosemary)\nFlourish(rosemary, con)\nDetox(rosemary, osmond)\nSpike(osmond, con)\nInculpable(osmond)\nDetox(osmond, con)\nSpike(con, rosemary)\nSpike(con, osmond)\nAcanthotic(con)\nDetox(con, osmond)\nforall x (Inviolable(x) -> Flourish(x, rosemary))\nforall x (Flourish(x, rosemary) and Flourish(x, con) -> Spike(rosemary, osmond))\n\nnot Blue(rosemary)\n\nnot Blue(rosemary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The heda unsettle the dolora. The heda is underlying. The heda is scaphoid. The heda table the dolora. The heda relinquish the veronique. The veronique unsettle the dolora. The veronique is roman. The veronique relinquish the dolora. The dolora unsettle the heda. The dolora unsettle the veronique. The dolora is scaphoid. The dolora relinquish the veronique. If something is underlying then it table the heda. If something table the heda and it table the dolora then the heda unsettle the veronique. The dolora unsettle the dolora.", "logic": "\nUnsettle(heda, dolora)\nUnderlying(heda)\nScaphoid(heda)\nTable(heda, dolora)\nRelinquish(heda, veronique)\nUnsettle(veronique, dolora)\nRoman(veronique)\nRelinquish(veronique, dolora)\nUnsettle(dolora, heda)\nUnsettle(dolora, veronique)\nScaphoid(dolora)\nRelinquish(dolora, veronique)\nforall x (Underlying(x) -> Table(x, heda))\nforall x (Table(x, heda) and Table(x, dolora) -> Unsettle(heda, veronique))\n\nUnsettle(dolora, dolora)\n\nUnsettle(dolora, dolora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "Gaynor is direct. Datha is soughing. Wilt is wearable. Big people are ameboid. If someone is bareheaded and direct then they are wearable. Cold, wearable people are apterous. Wilt is wearable.", "logic": "\nDirect(gaynor)\nSoughing(datha)\nWearable(wilt)\nforall x (Wearable(x) -> Ameboid(x))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) and Direct(x) -> Wearable(x))\nforall x (Ameboid(x) and Wearable(x) -> Apterous(x))\n\nWearable(wilt)\n\ntherefore Wearable(wilt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Smitty is neapolitan. Cherice is bacillar. Philip is brindle. Big people are liquefied. If someone is neoplastic and neapolitan then they are brindle. Cold, brindle people are viscous. Philip is not brindle.", "logic": "\nNeapolitan(smitty)\nBacillar(cherice)\nBrindle(philip)\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Liquefied(x))\nforall x (Neoplastic(x) and Neapolitan(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Liquefied(x) and Brindle(x) -> Viscous(x))\n\nnot Brindle(philip)\n\ntherefore Brindle(philip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Channa is allusive. Vallie is definite. Trace is autoerotic. Big people are cognisant. If someone is empathetic and allusive then they are autoerotic. Cold, autoerotic people are least. Trace is cognisant.", "logic": "\nAllusive(channa)\nDefinite(vallie)\nAutoerotic(trace)\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Cognisant(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) and Allusive(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and Autoerotic(x) -> Least(x))\n\nCognisant(trace)\n\nAutoerotic(trace) and forall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Cognisant(x)) -> therefore Cognisant(trace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Trix is unfeeling. Sukey is crimson. Jami is deskbound. Big people are pretorian. If someone is undulatory and unfeeling then they are deskbound. Cold, deskbound people are furled. Jami is not pretorian.", "logic": "\nUnfeeling(trix)\nCrimson(sukey)\nDeskbound(jami)\nforall x (Deskbound(x) -> Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Undulatory(x) and Unfeeling(x) -> Deskbound(x))\nforall x (Pretorian(x) and Deskbound(x) -> Furled(x))\n\nnot Pretorian(jami)\n\nDeskbound(jami) and forall x (Deskbound(x) -> Pretorian(x)) -> therefore Pretorian(jami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Matthew is surficial. Jackelyn is cxxv. Lissy is bootless. Big people are structured. If someone is boric and surficial then they are bootless. Cold, bootless people are bitter. Lissy is bitter.", "logic": "\nSurficial(matthew)\nCxxv(jackelyn)\nBootless(lissy)\nforall x (Bootless(x) -> Structured(x))\nforall x (Boric(x) and Surficial(x) -> Bootless(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) and Bootless(x) -> Bitter(x))\n\nBitter(lissy)\n\nBootless(lissy) and forall x (Bootless(x) -> Structured(x)) -> therefore Structured(lissy) Structured(lissy) and Bootless(lissy) and forall x (Structured(x) and Bootless(x) -> Bitter(x)) -> therefore Bitter(lissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Averyl is allocable. Lukas is notifiable. Guy is tutelar. Big people are erstwhile. If someone is uncertain and allocable then they are tutelar. Cold, tutelar people are orbital. Guy is not orbital.", "logic": "\nAllocable(averyl)\nNotifiable(lukas)\nTutelar(guy)\nforall x (Tutelar(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and Allocable(x) -> Tutelar(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) and Tutelar(x) -> Orbital(x))\n\nnot Orbital(guy)\n\nTutelar(guy) and forall x (Tutelar(x) -> Erstwhile(x)) -> therefore Erstwhile(guy) Erstwhile(guy) and Tutelar(guy) and forall x (Erstwhile(x) and Tutelar(x) -> Orbital(x)) -> therefore Orbital(guy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Teena is combed. Giacinta is obstinate. Lauraine is positional. Big people are anapaestic. If someone is soothing and combed then they are positional. Cold, positional people are triclinic. Teena is not anapaestic.", "logic": "\nCombed(teena)\nObstinate(giacinta)\nPositional(lauraine)\nforall x (Positional(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Soothing(x) and Combed(x) -> Positional(x))\nforall x (Anapaestic(x) and Positional(x) -> Triclinic(x))\n\nnot Anapaestic(teena)\n\nforall x (Positional(x) -> Anapaestic(x)) <- forall x (Soothing(x) and Combed(x) -> Positional(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Madalena is impassable. Willamina is smelling. Corrinne is navigable. Big people are rousseauan. If someone is synovial and impassable then they are navigable. Cold, navigable people are paperlike. Willamina is rousseauan.", "logic": "\nImpassable(madalena)\nSmelling(willamina)\nNavigable(corrinne)\nforall x (Navigable(x) -> Rousseauan(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) and Impassable(x) -> Navigable(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) and Navigable(x) -> Paperlike(x))\n\nRousseauan(willamina)\n\nforall x (Navigable(x) -> Rousseauan(x)) <- forall x (Synovial(x) and Impassable(x) -> Navigable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Sal is sanitary. Pate is knifelike. Otto is adsorbent. Big people are ramshackle. If someone is semisolid and sanitary then they are adsorbent. Cold, adsorbent people are rimose. Sal is not adsorbent.", "logic": "\nSanitary(sal)\nKnifelike(pate)\nAdsorbent(otto)\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Ramshackle(x))\nforall x (Semisolid(x) and Sanitary(x) -> Adsorbent(x))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) and Adsorbent(x) -> Rimose(x))\n\nnot Adsorbent(sal)\n\nforall x (Semisolid(x) and Sanitary(x) -> Adsorbent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Carolan is busted. Candide is faded. Nathalie is uncharged. Big people are bedrid. If someone is forested and busted then they are uncharged. Cold, uncharged people are factual. Carolan is kind.", "logic": "\nBusted(carolan)\nFaded(candide)\nUncharged(nathalie)\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Bedrid(x))\nforall x (Forested(x) and Busted(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and Uncharged(x) -> Factual(x))\n\nKind(carolan)\n\nKind(carolan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Salvador is unengaged. Zebadiah is moonstruck. Garfield is indirect. Big people are cuspidated. If someone is possessed and unengaged then they are indirect. Cold, indirect people are abdominous. Salvador is not possessed.", "logic": "\nUnengaged(salvador)\nMoonstruck(zebadiah)\nIndirect(garfield)\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\nforall x (Possessed(x) and Unengaged(x) -> Indirect(x))\nforall x (Cuspidated(x) and Indirect(x) -> Abdominous(x))\n\nnot Possessed(salvador)\n\nnot Possessed(salvador) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "Sunshine is measured. Sal is sequined. Laverna is jade. Big people are valent. If someone is tweedy and measured then they are jade. Cold, jade people are noncurrent. Sal is measured.", "logic": "\nMeasured(sunshine)\nSequined(sal)\nJade(laverna)\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Valent(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Measured(x) -> Jade(x))\nforall x (Valent(x) and Jade(x) -> Noncurrent(x))\n\nMeasured(sal)\n\nMeasured(sal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1900"} {"premises": "The vasilis release the jyoti. The vasilis scrape the donielle. The vasilis scrape the jyoti. The donielle release the vasilis. The donielle release the jyoti. The donielle delete the vasilis. The donielle is christless. The jyoti delete the donielle. The jyoti is demotic. The jyoti scrape the donielle. If the vasilis scrape the donielle then the vasilis release the donielle. If something release the donielle then it delete the vasilis. The vasilis release the jyoti.", "logic": "\nRelease(vasilis, jyoti)\nScrape(vasilis, donielle)\nScrape(vasilis, jyoti)\nRelease(donielle, vasilis)\nRelease(donielle, jyoti)\nDelete(donielle, vasilis)\nChristless(donielle)\nDelete(jyoti, donielle)\nDemotic(jyoti)\nScrape(jyoti, donielle)\nScrape(vasilis, donielle) -> Release(vasilis, donielle)\nforall x (Release(x, donielle) -> Delete(x, vasilis))\n\nRelease(vasilis, jyoti)\n\ntherefore Release(vasilis, jyoti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The kelley roost the coriss. The kelley scud the wilmar. The kelley scud the coriss. The wilmar roost the kelley. The wilmar roost the coriss. The wilmar handcraft the kelley. The wilmar is waterproof. The coriss handcraft the wilmar. The coriss is castled. The coriss scud the wilmar. If the kelley scud the wilmar then the kelley roost the wilmar. If something roost the wilmar then it handcraft the kelley. The kelley does not like the wilmar.", "logic": "\nRoost(kelley, coriss)\nScud(kelley, wilmar)\nScud(kelley, coriss)\nRoost(wilmar, kelley)\nRoost(wilmar, coriss)\nHandcraft(wilmar, kelley)\nWaterproof(wilmar)\nHandcraft(coriss, wilmar)\nCastled(coriss)\nScud(coriss, wilmar)\nScud(kelley, wilmar) -> Roost(kelley, wilmar)\nforall x (Roost(x, wilmar) -> Handcraft(x, kelley))\n\nnot Scud(kelley, wilmar)\n\ntherefore Scud(kelley, wilmar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The daile harangue the parke. The daile chink the milo. The daile chink the parke. The milo harangue the daile. The milo harangue the parke. The milo smirk the daile. The milo is leavened. The parke smirk the milo. The parke is bidentate. The parke chink the milo. If the daile chink the milo then the daile harangue the milo. If something harangue the milo then it smirk the daile. The daile harangue the milo.", "logic": "\nHarangue(daile, parke)\nChink(daile, milo)\nChink(daile, parke)\nHarangue(milo, daile)\nHarangue(milo, parke)\nSmirk(milo, daile)\nLeavened(milo)\nSmirk(parke, milo)\nBidentate(parke)\nChink(parke, milo)\nChink(daile, milo) -> Harangue(daile, milo)\nforall x (Harangue(x, milo) -> Smirk(x, daile))\n\nHarangue(daile, milo)\n\nChink(daile, milo) and Chink(daile, milo) -> Harangue(daile, milo) -> therefore Harangue(daile, milo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The magdaia enervate the aeriell. The magdaia neigh the romona. The magdaia neigh the aeriell. The romona enervate the magdaia. The romona enervate the aeriell. The romona opine the magdaia. The romona is attacking. The aeriell opine the romona. The aeriell is maximal. The aeriell neigh the romona. If the magdaia neigh the romona then the magdaia enervate the romona. If something enervate the romona then it opine the magdaia. The magdaia does not chase the romona.", "logic": "\nEnervate(magdaia, aeriell)\nNeigh(magdaia, romona)\nNeigh(magdaia, aeriell)\nEnervate(romona, magdaia)\nEnervate(romona, aeriell)\nOpine(romona, magdaia)\nAttacking(romona)\nOpine(aeriell, romona)\nMaximal(aeriell)\nNeigh(aeriell, romona)\nNeigh(magdaia, romona) -> Enervate(magdaia, romona)\nforall x (Enervate(x, romona) -> Opine(x, magdaia))\n\nnot Enervate(magdaia, romona)\n\nNeigh(magdaia, romona) and Neigh(magdaia, romona) -> Enervate(magdaia, romona) -> therefore Enervate(magdaia, romona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The filip hump the gussi. The filip reenact the bertram. The filip reenact the gussi. The bertram hump the filip. The bertram hump the gussi. The bertram maturate the filip. The bertram is recurvate. The gussi maturate the bertram. The gussi is affluent. The gussi reenact the bertram. If the filip reenact the bertram then the filip hump the bertram. If something hump the bertram then it maturate the filip. The filip maturate the filip.", "logic": "\nHump(filip, gussi)\nReenact(filip, bertram)\nReenact(filip, gussi)\nHump(bertram, filip)\nHump(bertram, gussi)\nMaturate(bertram, filip)\nRecurvate(bertram)\nMaturate(gussi, bertram)\nAffluent(gussi)\nReenact(gussi, bertram)\nReenact(filip, bertram) -> Hump(filip, bertram)\nforall x (Hump(x, bertram) -> Maturate(x, filip))\n\nMaturate(filip, filip)\n\nReenact(filip, bertram) and Reenact(filip, bertram) -> Hump(filip, bertram) -> therefore Hump(filip, bertram) Hump(filip, bertram) and forall x (Hump(x, bertram) -> Maturate(x, filip)) -> therefore Maturate(filip, filip)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The emmanuel outshout the fabio. The emmanuel fillet the cloris. The emmanuel fillet the fabio. The cloris outshout the emmanuel. The cloris outshout the fabio. The cloris seal the emmanuel. The cloris is prakritic. The fabio seal the cloris. The fabio is fogged. The fabio fillet the cloris. If the emmanuel fillet the cloris then the emmanuel outshout the cloris. If something outshout the cloris then it seal the emmanuel. The emmanuel does not eat the emmanuel.", "logic": "\nOutshout(emmanuel, fabio)\nFillet(emmanuel, cloris)\nFillet(emmanuel, fabio)\nOutshout(cloris, emmanuel)\nOutshout(cloris, fabio)\nSeal(cloris, emmanuel)\nPrakritic(cloris)\nSeal(fabio, cloris)\nFogged(fabio)\nFillet(fabio, cloris)\nFillet(emmanuel, cloris) -> Outshout(emmanuel, cloris)\nforall x (Outshout(x, cloris) -> Seal(x, emmanuel))\n\nnot Seal(emmanuel, emmanuel)\n\nFillet(emmanuel, cloris) and Fillet(emmanuel, cloris) -> Outshout(emmanuel, cloris) -> therefore Outshout(emmanuel, cloris) Outshout(emmanuel, cloris) and forall x (Outshout(x, cloris) -> Seal(x, emmanuel)) -> therefore Seal(emmanuel, emmanuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The esta aliment the sheffield. The esta lengthen the chiarra. The esta lengthen the sheffield. The chiarra aliment the esta. The chiarra aliment the sheffield. The chiarra budge the esta. The chiarra is uncrowded. The sheffield budge the chiarra. The sheffield is solid. The sheffield lengthen the chiarra. If the esta lengthen the chiarra then the esta aliment the chiarra. If something aliment the chiarra then it budge the esta. The sheffield does not eat the esta.", "logic": "\nAliment(esta, sheffield)\nLengthen(esta, chiarra)\nLengthen(esta, sheffield)\nAliment(chiarra, esta)\nAliment(chiarra, sheffield)\nBudge(chiarra, esta)\nUncrowded(chiarra)\nBudge(sheffield, chiarra)\nSolid(sheffield)\nLengthen(sheffield, chiarra)\nLengthen(esta, chiarra) -> Aliment(esta, chiarra)\nforall x (Aliment(x, chiarra) -> Budge(x, esta))\n\nnot Budge(sheffield, esta)\n\nforall x (Aliment(x, chiarra) -> Budge(x, esta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The jon lock the maddi. The jon ornament the vivyanne. The jon ornament the maddi. The vivyanne lock the jon. The vivyanne lock the maddi. The vivyanne worst the jon. The vivyanne is voracious. The maddi worst the vivyanne. The maddi is brisk. The maddi ornament the vivyanne. If the jon ornament the vivyanne then the jon lock the vivyanne. If something lock the vivyanne then it worst the jon. The jon worst the maddi.", "logic": "\nLock(jon, maddi)\nOrnament(jon, vivyanne)\nOrnament(jon, maddi)\nLock(vivyanne, jon)\nLock(vivyanne, maddi)\nWorst(vivyanne, jon)\nVoracious(vivyanne)\nWorst(maddi, vivyanne)\nBrisk(maddi)\nOrnament(maddi, vivyanne)\nOrnament(jon, vivyanne) -> Lock(jon, vivyanne)\nforall x (Lock(x, vivyanne) -> Worst(x, jon))\n\nWorst(jon, maddi)\n\nWorst(jon, maddi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The kalina bloat the woodie. The kalina deplore the guenna. The kalina deplore the woodie. The guenna bloat the kalina. The guenna bloat the woodie. The guenna culture the kalina. The guenna is profitable. The woodie culture the guenna. The woodie is fulgurant. The woodie deplore the guenna. If the kalina deplore the guenna then the kalina bloat the guenna. If something bloat the guenna then it culture the kalina. The woodie does not chase the guenna.", "logic": "\nBloat(kalina, woodie)\nDeplore(kalina, guenna)\nDeplore(kalina, woodie)\nBloat(guenna, kalina)\nBloat(guenna, woodie)\nCulture(guenna, kalina)\nProfitable(guenna)\nCulture(woodie, guenna)\nFulgurant(woodie)\nDeplore(woodie, guenna)\nDeplore(kalina, guenna) -> Bloat(kalina, guenna)\nforall x (Bloat(x, guenna) -> Culture(x, kalina))\n\nnot Bloat(woodie, guenna)\n\nnot Bloat(woodie, guenna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The greer itinerate the nicholle. The greer aggravate the ranique. The greer aggravate the nicholle. The ranique itinerate the greer. The ranique itinerate the nicholle. The ranique palm the greer. The ranique is untanned. The nicholle palm the ranique. The nicholle is dissenting. The nicholle aggravate the ranique. If the greer aggravate the ranique then the greer itinerate the ranique. If something itinerate the ranique then it palm the greer. The ranique aggravate the nicholle.", "logic": "\nItinerate(greer, nicholle)\nAggravate(greer, ranique)\nAggravate(greer, nicholle)\nItinerate(ranique, greer)\nItinerate(ranique, nicholle)\nPalm(ranique, greer)\nUntanned(ranique)\nPalm(nicholle, ranique)\nDissenting(nicholle)\nAggravate(nicholle, ranique)\nAggravate(greer, ranique) -> Itinerate(greer, ranique)\nforall x (Itinerate(x, ranique) -> Palm(x, greer))\n\nAggravate(ranique, nicholle)\n\nAggravate(ranique, nicholle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The kellia whisker the waldo. The kellia mutilate the barnabe. The kellia mutilate the waldo. The barnabe whisker the kellia. The barnabe whisker the waldo. The barnabe brachiate the kellia. The barnabe is undone. The waldo brachiate the barnabe. The waldo is seasoned. The waldo mutilate the barnabe. If the kellia mutilate the barnabe then the kellia whisker the barnabe. If something whisker the barnabe then it brachiate the kellia. The barnabe does not like the barnabe.", "logic": "\nWhisker(kellia, waldo)\nMutilate(kellia, barnabe)\nMutilate(kellia, waldo)\nWhisker(barnabe, kellia)\nWhisker(barnabe, waldo)\nBrachiate(barnabe, kellia)\nUndone(barnabe)\nBrachiate(waldo, barnabe)\nSeasoned(waldo)\nMutilate(waldo, barnabe)\nMutilate(kellia, barnabe) -> Whisker(kellia, barnabe)\nforall x (Whisker(x, barnabe) -> Brachiate(x, kellia))\n\nnot Mutilate(barnabe, barnabe)\n\nnot Mutilate(barnabe, barnabe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The cyril monkey the ulysses. The cyril ruminate the jabez. The cyril ruminate the ulysses. The jabez monkey the cyril. The jabez monkey the ulysses. The jabez initiate the cyril. The jabez is frontmost. The ulysses initiate the jabez. The ulysses is signal. The ulysses ruminate the jabez. If the cyril ruminate the jabez then the cyril monkey the jabez. If something monkey the jabez then it initiate the cyril. The cyril is frontmost.", "logic": "\nMonkey(cyril, ulysses)\nRuminate(cyril, jabez)\nRuminate(cyril, ulysses)\nMonkey(jabez, cyril)\nMonkey(jabez, ulysses)\nInitiate(jabez, cyril)\nFrontmost(jabez)\nInitiate(ulysses, jabez)\nSignal(ulysses)\nRuminate(ulysses, jabez)\nRuminate(cyril, jabez) -> Monkey(cyril, jabez)\nforall x (Monkey(x, jabez) -> Initiate(x, cyril))\n\nFrontmost(cyril)\n\nFrontmost(cyril) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The rebecca process the sharona. The rebecca is revealing. The rebecca is achaean. The rebecca is frenetic. The rebecca is propertied. The rebecca is flexile. The rebecca organise the sharona. The rebecca thump the sharona. The sharona process the rebecca. The sharona is revealing. The sharona is achaean. The sharona is frenetic. The sharona is propertied. The sharona is flexile. The sharona organise the rebecca. The sharona thump the rebecca. If someone is revealing and they see the sharona then the sharona process the rebecca. If someone process the rebecca and the rebecca process the sharona then the sharona process the rebecca. If someone organise the rebecca then the rebecca organise the sharona. If someone thump the rebecca and the rebecca organise the sharona then they see the rebecca. If someone is flexile and they chase the rebecca then they see the rebecca. If someone process the sharona and they see the sharona then the sharona process the rebecca. If someone organise the sharona and the sharona is achaean then they chase the rebecca. If the sharona thump the rebecca then the sharona process the rebecca. The rebecca organise the sharona.", "logic": "\nProcess(rebecca, sharona)\nRevealing(rebecca)\nAchaean(rebecca)\nFrenetic(rebecca)\nPropertied(rebecca)\nFlexile(rebecca)\nOrganise(rebecca, sharona)\nThump(rebecca, sharona)\nProcess(sharona, rebecca)\nRevealing(sharona)\nAchaean(sharona)\nFrenetic(sharona)\nPropertied(sharona)\nFlexile(sharona)\nOrganise(sharona, rebecca)\nThump(sharona, rebecca)\nforall x (Revealing(x) and Organise(x, sharona) -> Process(sharona, rebecca))\nforall x (Process(x, rebecca) and Process(rebecca, sharona) -> Process(sharona, rebecca))\nforall x (Organise(x, rebecca) -> Organise(rebecca, sharona))\nforall x (Thump(x, rebecca) and Organise(rebecca, sharona) -> Organise(x, rebecca))\nforall x (Flexile(x) and Process(x, rebecca) -> Organise(x, rebecca))\nforall x (Process(x, sharona) and Organise(x, sharona) -> Process(sharona, rebecca))\nforall x (Organise(x, sharona) and Achaean(sharona) -> Process(x, rebecca))\nThump(sharona, rebecca) -> Process(sharona, rebecca)\n\nOrganise(rebecca, sharona)\n\ntherefore Organise(rebecca, sharona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The wilt urge the maurie. The wilt is tragical. The wilt is imbecile. The wilt is modernized. The wilt is stuck. The wilt is unforced. The wilt condone the maurie. The wilt slime the maurie. The maurie urge the wilt. The maurie is tragical. The maurie is imbecile. The maurie is modernized. The maurie is stuck. The maurie is unforced. The maurie condone the wilt. The maurie slime the wilt. If someone is tragical and they see the maurie then the maurie urge the wilt. If someone urge the wilt and the wilt urge the maurie then the maurie urge the wilt. If someone condone the wilt then the wilt condone the maurie. If someone slime the wilt and the wilt condone the maurie then they see the wilt. If someone is unforced and they chase the wilt then they see the wilt. If someone urge the maurie and they see the maurie then the maurie urge the wilt. If someone condone the maurie and the maurie is imbecile then they chase the wilt. If the maurie slime the wilt then the maurie urge the wilt. The wilt is not stuck.", "logic": "\nUrge(wilt, maurie)\nTragical(wilt)\nImbecile(wilt)\nModernized(wilt)\nStuck(wilt)\nUnforced(wilt)\nCondone(wilt, maurie)\nSlime(wilt, maurie)\nUrge(maurie, wilt)\nTragical(maurie)\nImbecile(maurie)\nModernized(maurie)\nStuck(maurie)\nUnforced(maurie)\nCondone(maurie, wilt)\nSlime(maurie, wilt)\nforall x (Tragical(x) and Condone(x, maurie) -> Urge(maurie, wilt))\nforall x (Urge(x, wilt) and Urge(wilt, maurie) -> Urge(maurie, wilt))\nforall x (Condone(x, wilt) -> Condone(wilt, maurie))\nforall x (Slime(x, wilt) and Condone(wilt, maurie) -> Condone(x, wilt))\nforall x (Unforced(x) and Urge(x, wilt) -> Condone(x, wilt))\nforall x (Urge(x, maurie) and Condone(x, maurie) -> Urge(maurie, wilt))\nforall x (Condone(x, maurie) and Imbecile(maurie) -> Urge(x, wilt))\nSlime(maurie, wilt) -> Urge(maurie, wilt)\n\nnot Stuck(wilt)\n\ntherefore Stuck(wilt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The adolphus articulate the abigail. The adolphus is springless. The adolphus is mutational. The adolphus is lowbrowed. The adolphus is rimy. The adolphus is imprudent. The adolphus refurbish the abigail. The adolphus bunt the abigail. The abigail articulate the adolphus. The abigail is springless. The abigail is mutational. The abigail is lowbrowed. The abigail is rimy. The abigail is imprudent. The abigail refurbish the adolphus. The abigail bunt the adolphus. If someone is springless and they see the abigail then the abigail articulate the adolphus. If someone articulate the adolphus and the adolphus articulate the abigail then the abigail articulate the adolphus. If someone refurbish the adolphus then the adolphus refurbish the abigail. If someone bunt the adolphus and the adolphus refurbish the abigail then they see the adolphus. If someone is imprudent and they chase the adolphus then they see the adolphus. If someone articulate the abigail and they see the abigail then the abigail articulate the adolphus. If someone refurbish the abigail and the abigail is mutational then they chase the adolphus. If the abigail bunt the adolphus then the abigail articulate the adolphus. The adolphus articulate the adolphus.", "logic": "\nArticulate(adolphus, abigail)\nSpringless(adolphus)\nMutational(adolphus)\nLowbrowed(adolphus)\nRimy(adolphus)\nImprudent(adolphus)\nRefurbish(adolphus, abigail)\nBunt(adolphus, abigail)\nArticulate(abigail, adolphus)\nSpringless(abigail)\nMutational(abigail)\nLowbrowed(abigail)\nRimy(abigail)\nImprudent(abigail)\nRefurbish(abigail, adolphus)\nBunt(abigail, adolphus)\nforall x (Springless(x) and Refurbish(x, abigail) -> Articulate(abigail, adolphus))\nforall x (Articulate(x, adolphus) and Articulate(adolphus, abigail) -> Articulate(abigail, adolphus))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, adolphus) -> Refurbish(adolphus, abigail))\nforall x (Bunt(x, adolphus) and Refurbish(adolphus, abigail) -> Refurbish(x, adolphus))\nforall x (Imprudent(x) and Articulate(x, adolphus) -> Refurbish(x, adolphus))\nforall x (Articulate(x, abigail) and Refurbish(x, abigail) -> Articulate(abigail, adolphus))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, abigail) and Mutational(abigail) -> Articulate(x, adolphus))\nBunt(abigail, adolphus) -> Articulate(abigail, adolphus)\n\nArticulate(adolphus, adolphus)\n\nRefurbish(adolphus, abigail) and Mutational(abigail) and forall x (Refurbish(x, abigail) and Mutational(abigail) -> Articulate(x, adolphus)) -> therefore Articulate(adolphus, adolphus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The matthew snap the kanya. The matthew is zenithal. The matthew is patronized. The matthew is romanian. The matthew is dolomitic. The matthew is fiddling. The matthew dogmatize the kanya. The matthew disembody the kanya. The kanya snap the matthew. The kanya is zenithal. The kanya is patronized. The kanya is romanian. The kanya is dolomitic. The kanya is fiddling. The kanya dogmatize the matthew. The kanya disembody the matthew. If someone is zenithal and they see the kanya then the kanya snap the matthew. If someone snap the matthew and the matthew snap the kanya then the kanya snap the matthew. If someone dogmatize the matthew then the matthew dogmatize the kanya. If someone disembody the matthew and the matthew dogmatize the kanya then they see the matthew. If someone is fiddling and they chase the matthew then they see the matthew. If someone snap the kanya and they see the kanya then the kanya snap the matthew. If someone dogmatize the kanya and the kanya is patronized then they chase the matthew. If the kanya disembody the matthew then the kanya snap the matthew. The matthew does not chase the matthew.", "logic": "\nSnap(matthew, kanya)\nZenithal(matthew)\nPatronized(matthew)\nRomanian(matthew)\nDolomitic(matthew)\nFiddling(matthew)\nDogmatize(matthew, kanya)\nDisembody(matthew, kanya)\nSnap(kanya, matthew)\nZenithal(kanya)\nPatronized(kanya)\nRomanian(kanya)\nDolomitic(kanya)\nFiddling(kanya)\nDogmatize(kanya, matthew)\nDisembody(kanya, matthew)\nforall x (Zenithal(x) and Dogmatize(x, kanya) -> Snap(kanya, matthew))\nforall x (Snap(x, matthew) and Snap(matthew, kanya) -> Snap(kanya, matthew))\nforall x (Dogmatize(x, matthew) -> Dogmatize(matthew, kanya))\nforall x (Disembody(x, matthew) and Dogmatize(matthew, kanya) -> Dogmatize(x, matthew))\nforall x (Fiddling(x) and Snap(x, matthew) -> Dogmatize(x, matthew))\nforall x (Snap(x, kanya) and Dogmatize(x, kanya) -> Snap(kanya, matthew))\nforall x (Dogmatize(x, kanya) and Patronized(kanya) -> Snap(x, matthew))\nDisembody(kanya, matthew) -> Snap(kanya, matthew)\n\nnot Snap(matthew, matthew)\n\nDogmatize(matthew, kanya) and Patronized(kanya) and forall x (Dogmatize(x, kanya) and Patronized(kanya) -> Snap(x, matthew)) -> therefore Snap(matthew, matthew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The robin equalise the amy. The robin is transient. The robin is preserved. The robin is clastic. The robin is glorified. The robin is destined. The robin overwork the amy. The robin oversupply the amy. The amy equalise the robin. The amy is transient. The amy is preserved. The amy is clastic. The amy is glorified. The amy is destined. The amy overwork the robin. The amy oversupply the robin. If someone is transient and they see the amy then the amy equalise the robin. If someone equalise the robin and the robin equalise the amy then the amy equalise the robin. If someone overwork the robin then the robin overwork the amy. If someone oversupply the robin and the robin overwork the amy then they see the robin. If someone is destined and they chase the robin then they see the robin. If someone equalise the amy and they see the amy then the amy equalise the robin. If someone overwork the amy and the amy is preserved then they chase the robin. If the amy oversupply the robin then the amy equalise the robin. The robin overwork the robin.", "logic": "\nEqualise(robin, amy)\nTransient(robin)\nPreserved(robin)\nClastic(robin)\nGlorified(robin)\nDestined(robin)\nOverwork(robin, amy)\nOversupply(robin, amy)\nEqualise(amy, robin)\nTransient(amy)\nPreserved(amy)\nClastic(amy)\nGlorified(amy)\nDestined(amy)\nOverwork(amy, robin)\nOversupply(amy, robin)\nforall x (Transient(x) and Overwork(x, amy) -> Equalise(amy, robin))\nforall x (Equalise(x, robin) and Equalise(robin, amy) -> Equalise(amy, robin))\nforall x (Overwork(x, robin) -> Overwork(robin, amy))\nforall x (Oversupply(x, robin) and Overwork(robin, amy) -> Overwork(x, robin))\nforall x (Destined(x) and Equalise(x, robin) -> Overwork(x, robin))\nforall x (Equalise(x, amy) and Overwork(x, amy) -> Equalise(amy, robin))\nforall x (Overwork(x, amy) and Preserved(amy) -> Equalise(x, robin))\nOversupply(amy, robin) -> Equalise(amy, robin)\n\nOverwork(robin, robin)\n\nOverwork(robin, amy) and Preserved(amy) and forall x (Overwork(x, amy) and Preserved(amy) -> Equalise(x, robin)) -> therefore Equalise(robin, robin) Destined(robin) and Equalise(robin, robin) and forall x (Destined(x) and Equalise(x, robin) -> Overwork(x, robin)) -> therefore Overwork(robin, robin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The courtenay magnetise the latrina. The courtenay is enatic. The courtenay is incendiary. The courtenay is adient. The courtenay is movable. The courtenay is womanlike. The courtenay flounce the latrina. The courtenay feminise the latrina. The latrina magnetise the courtenay. The latrina is enatic. The latrina is incendiary. The latrina is adient. The latrina is movable. The latrina is womanlike. The latrina flounce the courtenay. The latrina feminise the courtenay. If someone is enatic and they see the latrina then the latrina magnetise the courtenay. If someone magnetise the courtenay and the courtenay magnetise the latrina then the latrina magnetise the courtenay. If someone flounce the courtenay then the courtenay flounce the latrina. If someone feminise the courtenay and the courtenay flounce the latrina then they see the courtenay. If someone is womanlike and they chase the courtenay then they see the courtenay. If someone magnetise the latrina and they see the latrina then the latrina magnetise the courtenay. If someone flounce the latrina and the latrina is incendiary then they chase the courtenay. If the latrina feminise the courtenay then the latrina magnetise the courtenay. The courtenay does not see the courtenay.", "logic": "\nMagnetise(courtenay, latrina)\nEnatic(courtenay)\nIncendiary(courtenay)\nAdient(courtenay)\nMovable(courtenay)\nWomanlike(courtenay)\nFlounce(courtenay, latrina)\nFeminise(courtenay, latrina)\nMagnetise(latrina, courtenay)\nEnatic(latrina)\nIncendiary(latrina)\nAdient(latrina)\nMovable(latrina)\nWomanlike(latrina)\nFlounce(latrina, courtenay)\nFeminise(latrina, courtenay)\nforall x (Enatic(x) and Flounce(x, latrina) -> Magnetise(latrina, courtenay))\nforall x (Magnetise(x, courtenay) and Magnetise(courtenay, latrina) -> Magnetise(latrina, courtenay))\nforall x (Flounce(x, courtenay) -> Flounce(courtenay, latrina))\nforall x (Feminise(x, courtenay) and Flounce(courtenay, latrina) -> Flounce(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) and Magnetise(x, courtenay) -> Flounce(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Magnetise(x, latrina) and Flounce(x, latrina) -> Magnetise(latrina, courtenay))\nforall x (Flounce(x, latrina) and Incendiary(latrina) -> Magnetise(x, courtenay))\nFeminise(latrina, courtenay) -> Magnetise(latrina, courtenay)\n\nnot Flounce(courtenay, courtenay)\n\nFlounce(courtenay, latrina) and Incendiary(latrina) and forall x (Flounce(x, latrina) and Incendiary(latrina) -> Magnetise(x, courtenay)) -> therefore Magnetise(courtenay, courtenay) Womanlike(courtenay) and Magnetise(courtenay, courtenay) and forall x (Womanlike(x) and Magnetise(x, courtenay) -> Flounce(x, courtenay)) -> therefore Flounce(courtenay, courtenay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The victor poise the emlynne. The victor is incarnate. The victor is playful. The victor is exhaustive. The victor is allotted. The victor is medicinal. The victor mesmerize the emlynne. The victor permeate the emlynne. The emlynne poise the victor. The emlynne is incarnate. The emlynne is playful. The emlynne is exhaustive. The emlynne is allotted. The emlynne is medicinal. The emlynne mesmerize the victor. The emlynne permeate the victor. If someone is incarnate and they see the emlynne then the emlynne poise the victor. If someone poise the victor and the victor poise the emlynne then the emlynne poise the victor. If someone mesmerize the victor then the victor mesmerize the emlynne. If someone permeate the victor and the victor mesmerize the emlynne then they see the victor. If someone is medicinal and they chase the victor then they see the victor. If someone poise the emlynne and they see the emlynne then the emlynne poise the victor. If someone mesmerize the emlynne and the emlynne is playful then they chase the victor. If the emlynne permeate the victor then the emlynne poise the victor. The victor does not visit the victor.", "logic": "\nPoise(victor, emlynne)\nIncarnate(victor)\nPlayful(victor)\nExhaustive(victor)\nAllotted(victor)\nMedicinal(victor)\nMesmerize(victor, emlynne)\nPermeate(victor, emlynne)\nPoise(emlynne, victor)\nIncarnate(emlynne)\nPlayful(emlynne)\nExhaustive(emlynne)\nAllotted(emlynne)\nMedicinal(emlynne)\nMesmerize(emlynne, victor)\nPermeate(emlynne, victor)\nforall x (Incarnate(x) and Mesmerize(x, emlynne) -> Poise(emlynne, victor))\nforall x (Poise(x, victor) and Poise(victor, emlynne) -> Poise(emlynne, victor))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, victor) -> Mesmerize(victor, emlynne))\nforall x (Permeate(x, victor) and Mesmerize(victor, emlynne) -> Mesmerize(x, victor))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) and Poise(x, victor) -> Mesmerize(x, victor))\nforall x (Poise(x, emlynne) and Mesmerize(x, emlynne) -> Poise(emlynne, victor))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, emlynne) and Playful(emlynne) -> Poise(x, victor))\nPermeate(emlynne, victor) -> Poise(emlynne, victor)\n\nnot Permeate(victor, victor)\n\nnot Permeate(victor, victor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The kirsten astringe the perceval. The kirsten is ensuant. The kirsten is embattled. The kirsten is kampuchean. The kirsten is whole. The kirsten is tired. The kirsten appal the perceval. The kirsten corduroy the perceval. The perceval astringe the kirsten. The perceval is ensuant. The perceval is embattled. The perceval is kampuchean. The perceval is whole. The perceval is tired. The perceval appal the kirsten. The perceval corduroy the kirsten. If someone is ensuant and they see the perceval then the perceval astringe the kirsten. If someone astringe the kirsten and the kirsten astringe the perceval then the perceval astringe the kirsten. If someone appal the kirsten then the kirsten appal the perceval. If someone corduroy the kirsten and the kirsten appal the perceval then they see the kirsten. If someone is tired and they chase the kirsten then they see the kirsten. If someone astringe the perceval and they see the perceval then the perceval astringe the kirsten. If someone appal the perceval and the perceval is embattled then they chase the kirsten. If the perceval corduroy the kirsten then the perceval astringe the kirsten. The perceval corduroy the perceval.", "logic": "\nAstringe(kirsten, perceval)\nEnsuant(kirsten)\nEmbattled(kirsten)\nKampuchean(kirsten)\nWhole(kirsten)\nTired(kirsten)\nAppal(kirsten, perceval)\nCorduroy(kirsten, perceval)\nAstringe(perceval, kirsten)\nEnsuant(perceval)\nEmbattled(perceval)\nKampuchean(perceval)\nWhole(perceval)\nTired(perceval)\nAppal(perceval, kirsten)\nCorduroy(perceval, kirsten)\nforall x (Ensuant(x) and Appal(x, perceval) -> Astringe(perceval, kirsten))\nforall x (Astringe(x, kirsten) and Astringe(kirsten, perceval) -> Astringe(perceval, kirsten))\nforall x (Appal(x, kirsten) -> Appal(kirsten, perceval))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, kirsten) and Appal(kirsten, perceval) -> Appal(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Tired(x) and Astringe(x, kirsten) -> Appal(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Astringe(x, perceval) and Appal(x, perceval) -> Astringe(perceval, kirsten))\nforall x (Appal(x, perceval) and Embattled(perceval) -> Astringe(x, kirsten))\nCorduroy(perceval, kirsten) -> Astringe(perceval, kirsten)\n\nCorduroy(perceval, perceval)\n\nCorduroy(perceval, perceval) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The gaven relent the marcela. The gaven is looted. The gaven is baboonish. The gaven is hugoesque. The gaven is statuary. The gaven is scalene. The gaven acuminate the marcela. The gaven devitrify the marcela. The marcela relent the gaven. The marcela is looted. The marcela is baboonish. The marcela is hugoesque. The marcela is statuary. The marcela is scalene. The marcela acuminate the gaven. The marcela devitrify the gaven. If someone is looted and they see the marcela then the marcela relent the gaven. If someone relent the gaven and the gaven relent the marcela then the marcela relent the gaven. If someone acuminate the gaven then the gaven acuminate the marcela. If someone devitrify the gaven and the gaven acuminate the marcela then they see the gaven. If someone is scalene and they chase the gaven then they see the gaven. If someone relent the marcela and they see the marcela then the marcela relent the gaven. If someone acuminate the marcela and the marcela is baboonish then they chase the gaven. If the marcela devitrify the gaven then the marcela relent the gaven. The marcela does not chase the marcela.", "logic": "\nRelent(gaven, marcela)\nLooted(gaven)\nBaboonish(gaven)\nHugoesque(gaven)\nStatuary(gaven)\nScalene(gaven)\nAcuminate(gaven, marcela)\nDevitrify(gaven, marcela)\nRelent(marcela, gaven)\nLooted(marcela)\nBaboonish(marcela)\nHugoesque(marcela)\nStatuary(marcela)\nScalene(marcela)\nAcuminate(marcela, gaven)\nDevitrify(marcela, gaven)\nforall x (Looted(x) and Acuminate(x, marcela) -> Relent(marcela, gaven))\nforall x (Relent(x, gaven) and Relent(gaven, marcela) -> Relent(marcela, gaven))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, gaven) -> Acuminate(gaven, marcela))\nforall x (Devitrify(x, gaven) and Acuminate(gaven, marcela) -> Acuminate(x, gaven))\nforall x (Scalene(x) and Relent(x, gaven) -> Acuminate(x, gaven))\nforall x (Relent(x, marcela) and Acuminate(x, marcela) -> Relent(marcela, gaven))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, marcela) and Baboonish(marcela) -> Relent(x, gaven))\nDevitrify(marcela, gaven) -> Relent(marcela, gaven)\n\nnot Relent(marcela, marcela)\n\nnot Relent(marcela, marcela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "The vena shape the gerry. The vena is alkahestic. The vena is minty. The vena is plotted. The vena is mortified. The vena is frank. The vena repudiate the gerry. The vena capacitate the gerry. The gerry shape the vena. The gerry is alkahestic. The gerry is minty. The gerry is plotted. The gerry is mortified. The gerry is frank. The gerry repudiate the vena. The gerry capacitate the vena. If someone is alkahestic and they see the gerry then the gerry shape the vena. If someone shape the vena and the vena shape the gerry then the gerry shape the vena. If someone repudiate the vena then the vena repudiate the gerry. If someone capacitate the vena and the vena repudiate the gerry then they see the vena. If someone is frank and they chase the vena then they see the vena. If someone shape the gerry and they see the gerry then the gerry shape the vena. If someone repudiate the gerry and the gerry is minty then they chase the vena. If the gerry capacitate the vena then the gerry shape the vena. The gerry repudiate the gerry.", "logic": "\nShape(vena, gerry)\nAlkahestic(vena)\nMinty(vena)\nPlotted(vena)\nMortified(vena)\nFrank(vena)\nRepudiate(vena, gerry)\nCapacitate(vena, gerry)\nShape(gerry, vena)\nAlkahestic(gerry)\nMinty(gerry)\nPlotted(gerry)\nMortified(gerry)\nFrank(gerry)\nRepudiate(gerry, vena)\nCapacitate(gerry, vena)\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) and Repudiate(x, gerry) -> Shape(gerry, vena))\nforall x (Shape(x, vena) and Shape(vena, gerry) -> Shape(gerry, vena))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, vena) -> Repudiate(vena, gerry))\nforall x (Capacitate(x, vena) and Repudiate(vena, gerry) -> Repudiate(x, vena))\nforall x (Frank(x) and Shape(x, vena) -> Repudiate(x, vena))\nforall x (Shape(x, gerry) and Repudiate(x, gerry) -> Shape(gerry, vena))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, gerry) and Minty(gerry) -> Shape(x, vena))\nCapacitate(gerry, vena) -> Shape(gerry, vena)\n\nRepudiate(gerry, gerry)\n\nRepudiate(gerry, gerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1116"} {"premises": "Andra is stringent. Andra is enceinte. Roxine is not lanky. Roxine is abeyant. Roxine is crosswise. Roxine is midweekly. Bay is abeyant. If Roxine is silken and Roxine is midweekly then Roxine is crosswise. If Andra is silken and Andra is crosswise then Andra is midweekly. If Andra is not enceinte then Andra is not crosswise. If Andra is midweekly then Andra is crosswise. If something is midweekly and crosswise then it is stringent. All stringent, crosswise things are silken. All abeyant, stringent things are crosswise. If something is enceinte and not abeyant then it is midweekly. Andra is stringent.", "logic": "\nStringent(andra)\nEnceinte(andra)\nnot Lanky(roxine)\nAbeyant(roxine)\nCrosswise(roxine)\nMidweekly(roxine)\nAbeyant(bay)\nSilken(roxine) and Midweekly(roxine) -> Crosswise(roxine)\nSilken(andra) and Crosswise(andra) -> Midweekly(andra)\nnot Enceinte(andra) -> not Crosswise(andra)\nMidweekly(andra) -> Crosswise(andra)\nforall x (Midweekly(x) and Crosswise(x) -> Stringent(x))\nforall x (Stringent(x) and Crosswise(x) -> Silken(x))\nforall x (Abeyant(x) and Stringent(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Enceinte(x) and not Abeyant(x) -> Midweekly(x))\n\nStringent(andra)\n\ntherefore Stringent(andra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Dorise is epiphytic. Dorise is urbane. Chris is not mantled. Chris is ventricose. Chris is desired. Chris is soused. Harv is ventricose. If Chris is topmost and Chris is soused then Chris is desired. If Dorise is topmost and Dorise is desired then Dorise is soused. If Dorise is not urbane then Dorise is not desired. If Dorise is soused then Dorise is desired. If something is soused and desired then it is epiphytic. All epiphytic, desired things are topmost. All ventricose, epiphytic things are desired. If something is urbane and not ventricose then it is soused. Chris is not ventricose.", "logic": "\nEpiphytic(dorise)\nUrbane(dorise)\nnot Mantled(chris)\nVentricose(chris)\nDesired(chris)\nSoused(chris)\nVentricose(harv)\nTopmost(chris) and Soused(chris) -> Desired(chris)\nTopmost(dorise) and Desired(dorise) -> Soused(dorise)\nnot Urbane(dorise) -> not Desired(dorise)\nSoused(dorise) -> Desired(dorise)\nforall x (Soused(x) and Desired(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) and Desired(x) -> Topmost(x))\nforall x (Ventricose(x) and Epiphytic(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Urbane(x) and not Ventricose(x) -> Soused(x))\n\nnot Ventricose(chris)\n\ntherefore Ventricose(chris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Colette is vacuolated. Colette is cervine. Gerhardt is not crossbred. Gerhardt is maudlin. Gerhardt is beginning. Gerhardt is fourfold. Davidson is maudlin. If Gerhardt is goddam and Gerhardt is fourfold then Gerhardt is beginning. If Colette is goddam and Colette is beginning then Colette is fourfold. If Colette is not cervine then Colette is not beginning. If Colette is fourfold then Colette is beginning. If something is fourfold and beginning then it is vacuolated. All vacuolated, beginning things are goddam. All maudlin, vacuolated things are beginning. If something is cervine and not maudlin then it is fourfold. Gerhardt is vacuolated.", "logic": "\nVacuolated(colette)\nCervine(colette)\nnot Crossbred(gerhardt)\nMaudlin(gerhardt)\nBeginning(gerhardt)\nFourfold(gerhardt)\nMaudlin(davidson)\nGoddam(gerhardt) and Fourfold(gerhardt) -> Beginning(gerhardt)\nGoddam(colette) and Beginning(colette) -> Fourfold(colette)\nnot Cervine(colette) -> not Beginning(colette)\nFourfold(colette) -> Beginning(colette)\nforall x (Fourfold(x) and Beginning(x) -> Vacuolated(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) and Beginning(x) -> Goddam(x))\nforall x (Maudlin(x) and Vacuolated(x) -> Beginning(x))\nforall x (Cervine(x) and not Maudlin(x) -> Fourfold(x))\n\nVacuolated(gerhardt)\n\nFourfold(gerhardt) and Beginning(gerhardt) and forall x (Fourfold(x) and Beginning(x) -> Vacuolated(x)) -> therefore Vacuolated(gerhardt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Nunzio is residual. Nunzio is heraldist. Kacey is not feverish. Kacey is autolytic. Kacey is eellike. Kacey is coarse. Della is autolytic. If Kacey is even and Kacey is coarse then Kacey is eellike. If Nunzio is even and Nunzio is eellike then Nunzio is coarse. If Nunzio is not heraldist then Nunzio is not eellike. If Nunzio is coarse then Nunzio is eellike. If something is coarse and eellike then it is residual. All residual, eellike things are even. All autolytic, residual things are eellike. If something is heraldist and not autolytic then it is coarse. Kacey is not residual.", "logic": "\nResidual(nunzio)\nHeraldist(nunzio)\nnot Feverish(kacey)\nAutolytic(kacey)\nEellike(kacey)\nCoarse(kacey)\nAutolytic(della)\nEven(kacey) and Coarse(kacey) -> Eellike(kacey)\nEven(nunzio) and Eellike(nunzio) -> Coarse(nunzio)\nnot Heraldist(nunzio) -> not Eellike(nunzio)\nCoarse(nunzio) -> Eellike(nunzio)\nforall x (Coarse(x) and Eellike(x) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Residual(x) and Eellike(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Autolytic(x) and Residual(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) and not Autolytic(x) -> Coarse(x))\n\nnot Residual(kacey)\n\nCoarse(kacey) and Eellike(kacey) and forall x (Coarse(x) and Eellike(x) -> Residual(x)) -> therefore Residual(kacey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Gwenore is shipboard. Gwenore is chiliastic. Solly is not confusable. Solly is gambian. Solly is reusable. Solly is valved. Darda is gambian. If Solly is laciniate and Solly is valved then Solly is reusable. If Gwenore is laciniate and Gwenore is reusable then Gwenore is valved. If Gwenore is not chiliastic then Gwenore is not reusable. If Gwenore is valved then Gwenore is reusable. If something is valved and reusable then it is shipboard. All shipboard, reusable things are laciniate. All gambian, shipboard things are reusable. If something is chiliastic and not gambian then it is valved. Solly is laciniate.", "logic": "\nShipboard(gwenore)\nChiliastic(gwenore)\nnot Confusable(solly)\nGambian(solly)\nReusable(solly)\nValved(solly)\nGambian(darda)\nLaciniate(solly) and Valved(solly) -> Reusable(solly)\nLaciniate(gwenore) and Reusable(gwenore) -> Valved(gwenore)\nnot Chiliastic(gwenore) -> not Reusable(gwenore)\nValved(gwenore) -> Reusable(gwenore)\nforall x (Valved(x) and Reusable(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) and Reusable(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) and Shipboard(x) -> Reusable(x))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) and not Gambian(x) -> Valved(x))\n\nLaciniate(solly)\n\nValved(solly) and Reusable(solly) and forall x (Valved(x) and Reusable(x) -> Shipboard(x)) -> therefore Shipboard(solly) Shipboard(solly) and Reusable(solly) and forall x (Shipboard(x) and Reusable(x) -> Laciniate(x)) -> therefore Laciniate(solly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Babita is crumpled. Babita is berried. Allianora is not herbal. Allianora is delineated. Allianora is weaned. Allianora is different. Jud is delineated. If Allianora is champion and Allianora is different then Allianora is weaned. If Babita is champion and Babita is weaned then Babita is different. If Babita is not berried then Babita is not weaned. If Babita is different then Babita is weaned. If something is different and weaned then it is crumpled. All crumpled, weaned things are champion. All delineated, crumpled things are weaned. If something is berried and not delineated then it is different. Allianora is not champion.", "logic": "\nCrumpled(babita)\nBerried(babita)\nnot Herbal(allianora)\nDelineated(allianora)\nWeaned(allianora)\nDifferent(allianora)\nDelineated(jud)\nChampion(allianora) and Different(allianora) -> Weaned(allianora)\nChampion(babita) and Weaned(babita) -> Different(babita)\nnot Berried(babita) -> not Weaned(babita)\nDifferent(babita) -> Weaned(babita)\nforall x (Different(x) and Weaned(x) -> Crumpled(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) and Weaned(x) -> Champion(x))\nforall x (Delineated(x) and Crumpled(x) -> Weaned(x))\nforall x (Berried(x) and not Delineated(x) -> Different(x))\n\nnot Champion(allianora)\n\nDifferent(allianora) and Weaned(allianora) and forall x (Different(x) and Weaned(x) -> Crumpled(x)) -> therefore Crumpled(allianora) Crumpled(allianora) and Weaned(allianora) and forall x (Crumpled(x) and Weaned(x) -> Champion(x)) -> therefore Champion(allianora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Kellyann is formic. Kellyann is eponymic. Lucilia is not cognitive. Lucilia is mimetic. Lucilia is minus. Lucilia is incarnate. Paton is mimetic. If Lucilia is intrastate and Lucilia is incarnate then Lucilia is minus. If Kellyann is intrastate and Kellyann is minus then Kellyann is incarnate. If Kellyann is not eponymic then Kellyann is not minus. If Kellyann is incarnate then Kellyann is minus. If something is incarnate and minus then it is formic. All formic, minus things are intrastate. All mimetic, formic things are minus. If something is eponymic and not mimetic then it is incarnate. Paton is not minus.", "logic": "\nFormic(kellyann)\nEponymic(kellyann)\nnot Cognitive(lucilia)\nMimetic(lucilia)\nMinus(lucilia)\nIncarnate(lucilia)\nMimetic(paton)\nIntrastate(lucilia) and Incarnate(lucilia) -> Minus(lucilia)\nIntrastate(kellyann) and Minus(kellyann) -> Incarnate(kellyann)\nnot Eponymic(kellyann) -> not Minus(kellyann)\nIncarnate(kellyann) -> Minus(kellyann)\nforall x (Incarnate(x) and Minus(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Formic(x) and Minus(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Mimetic(x) and Formic(x) -> Minus(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and not Mimetic(x) -> Incarnate(x))\n\nnot Minus(paton)\n\nforall x (Mimetic(x) and Formic(x) -> Minus(x)) <- forall x (Incarnate(x) and Minus(x) -> Formic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Farrand is nazi. Farrand is ascetical. Cissie is not pastelike. Cissie is incertain. Cissie is perilous. Cissie is proactive. Mikel is incertain. If Cissie is schismatic and Cissie is proactive then Cissie is perilous. If Farrand is schismatic and Farrand is perilous then Farrand is proactive. If Farrand is not ascetical then Farrand is not perilous. If Farrand is proactive then Farrand is perilous. If something is proactive and perilous then it is nazi. All nazi, perilous things are schismatic. All incertain, nazi things are perilous. If something is ascetical and not incertain then it is proactive. Farrand is proactive.", "logic": "\nNazi(farrand)\nAscetical(farrand)\nnot Pastelike(cissie)\nIncertain(cissie)\nPerilous(cissie)\nProactive(cissie)\nIncertain(mikel)\nSchismatic(cissie) and Proactive(cissie) -> Perilous(cissie)\nSchismatic(farrand) and Perilous(farrand) -> Proactive(farrand)\nnot Ascetical(farrand) -> not Perilous(farrand)\nProactive(farrand) -> Perilous(farrand)\nforall x (Proactive(x) and Perilous(x) -> Nazi(x))\nforall x (Nazi(x) and Perilous(x) -> Schismatic(x))\nforall x (Incertain(x) and Nazi(x) -> Perilous(x))\nforall x (Ascetical(x) and not Incertain(x) -> Proactive(x))\n\nProactive(farrand)\n\nSchismatic(farrand) and Perilous(farrand) -> Proactive(farrand) <- Proactive(farrand) -> Perilous(farrand) <- forall x (Ascetical(x) and not Incertain(x) -> Proactive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Hewe is acapnial. Hewe is astomatal. Manon is not fingerless. Manon is braless. Manon is shiftless. Manon is homophobic. Josiah is braless. If Manon is liked and Manon is homophobic then Manon is shiftless. If Hewe is liked and Hewe is shiftless then Hewe is homophobic. If Hewe is not astomatal then Hewe is not shiftless. If Hewe is homophobic then Hewe is shiftless. If something is homophobic and shiftless then it is acapnial. All acapnial, shiftless things are liked. All braless, acapnial things are shiftless. If something is astomatal and not braless then it is homophobic. Josiah is not liked.", "logic": "\nAcapnial(hewe)\nAstomatal(hewe)\nnot Fingerless(manon)\nBraless(manon)\nShiftless(manon)\nHomophobic(manon)\nBraless(josiah)\nLiked(manon) and Homophobic(manon) -> Shiftless(manon)\nLiked(hewe) and Shiftless(hewe) -> Homophobic(hewe)\nnot Astomatal(hewe) -> not Shiftless(hewe)\nHomophobic(hewe) -> Shiftless(hewe)\nforall x (Homophobic(x) and Shiftless(x) -> Acapnial(x))\nforall x (Acapnial(x) and Shiftless(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Braless(x) and Acapnial(x) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Astomatal(x) and not Braless(x) -> Homophobic(x))\n\nnot Liked(josiah)\n\nforall x (Acapnial(x) and Shiftless(x) -> Liked(x)) <- forall x (Homophobic(x) and Shiftless(x) -> Acapnial(x)) <- forall x (Astomatal(x) and not Braless(x) -> Homophobic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Gwynne is living. Gwynne is corrigible. Hilarie is not honied. Hilarie is daunted. Hilarie is unmated. Hilarie is unpitying. Evan is daunted. If Hilarie is lamenting and Hilarie is unpitying then Hilarie is unmated. If Gwynne is lamenting and Gwynne is unmated then Gwynne is unpitying. If Gwynne is not corrigible then Gwynne is not unmated. If Gwynne is unpitying then Gwynne is unmated. If something is unpitying and unmated then it is living. All living, unmated things are lamenting. All daunted, living things are unmated. If something is corrigible and not daunted then it is unpitying. Gwynne is honied.", "logic": "\nLiving(gwynne)\nCorrigible(gwynne)\nnot Honied(hilarie)\nDaunted(hilarie)\nUnmated(hilarie)\nUnpitying(hilarie)\nDaunted(evan)\nLamenting(hilarie) and Unpitying(hilarie) -> Unmated(hilarie)\nLamenting(gwynne) and Unmated(gwynne) -> Unpitying(gwynne)\nnot Corrigible(gwynne) -> not Unmated(gwynne)\nUnpitying(gwynne) -> Unmated(gwynne)\nforall x (Unpitying(x) and Unmated(x) -> Living(x))\nforall x (Living(x) and Unmated(x) -> Lamenting(x))\nforall x (Daunted(x) and Living(x) -> Unmated(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) and not Daunted(x) -> Unpitying(x))\n\nHonied(gwynne)\n\nHonied(gwynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Mollie is select. Mollie is unwrinkled. Erinna is not starred. Erinna is sylvan. Erinna is nipping. Erinna is surface. Justis is sylvan. If Erinna is aperient and Erinna is surface then Erinna is nipping. If Mollie is aperient and Mollie is nipping then Mollie is surface. If Mollie is not unwrinkled then Mollie is not nipping. If Mollie is surface then Mollie is nipping. If something is surface and nipping then it is select. All select, nipping things are aperient. All sylvan, select things are nipping. If something is unwrinkled and not sylvan then it is surface. Justis is not starred.", "logic": "\nSelect(mollie)\nUnwrinkled(mollie)\nnot Starred(erinna)\nSylvan(erinna)\nNipping(erinna)\nSurface(erinna)\nSylvan(justis)\nAperient(erinna) and Surface(erinna) -> Nipping(erinna)\nAperient(mollie) and Nipping(mollie) -> Surface(mollie)\nnot Unwrinkled(mollie) -> not Nipping(mollie)\nSurface(mollie) -> Nipping(mollie)\nforall x (Surface(x) and Nipping(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Select(x) and Nipping(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Sylvan(x) and Select(x) -> Nipping(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) and not Sylvan(x) -> Surface(x))\n\nnot Starred(justis)\n\nnot Starred(justis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Dolly is rushed. Dolly is passionate. Lex is not diminished. Lex is canary. Lex is dopy. Lex is unfounded. Angelika is canary. If Lex is spherical and Lex is unfounded then Lex is dopy. If Dolly is spherical and Dolly is dopy then Dolly is unfounded. If Dolly is not passionate then Dolly is not dopy. If Dolly is unfounded then Dolly is dopy. If something is unfounded and dopy then it is rushed. All rushed, dopy things are spherical. All canary, rushed things are dopy. If something is passionate and not canary then it is unfounded. Dolly is canary.", "logic": "\nRushed(dolly)\nPassionate(dolly)\nnot Diminished(lex)\nCanary(lex)\nDopy(lex)\nUnfounded(lex)\nCanary(angelika)\nSpherical(lex) and Unfounded(lex) -> Dopy(lex)\nSpherical(dolly) and Dopy(dolly) -> Unfounded(dolly)\nnot Passionate(dolly) -> not Dopy(dolly)\nUnfounded(dolly) -> Dopy(dolly)\nforall x (Unfounded(x) and Dopy(x) -> Rushed(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) and Dopy(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Canary(x) and Rushed(x) -> Dopy(x))\nforall x (Passionate(x) and not Canary(x) -> Unfounded(x))\n\nCanary(dolly)\n\nCanary(dolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-920"} {"premises": "Evania is gimcrack. Evania is resistible. Evania is ninetieth. Bernie is ninetieth. Bernie is occlusive. Catherine is profaned. Catherine is gimcrack. All patellar people are profaned. All ninetieth people are gimcrack. All ninetieth, gimcrack people are resistible. Bernie is ninetieth.", "logic": "\nGimcrack(evania)\nResistible(evania)\nNinetieth(evania)\nNinetieth(bernie)\nOcclusive(bernie)\nProfaned(catherine)\nGimcrack(catherine)\nforall x (Patellar(x) -> Profaned(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) -> Gimcrack(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) and Gimcrack(x) -> Resistible(x))\n\nNinetieth(bernie)\n\ntherefore Ninetieth(bernie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Gracie is mitral. Gracie is pernickety. Gracie is stigmatic. Annalise is stigmatic. Annalise is muddied. Phyllys is ecstatic. Phyllys is mitral. All glassless people are ecstatic. All stigmatic people are mitral. All stigmatic, mitral people are pernickety. Gracie is not pernickety.", "logic": "\nMitral(gracie)\nPernickety(gracie)\nStigmatic(gracie)\nStigmatic(annalise)\nMuddied(annalise)\nEcstatic(phyllys)\nMitral(phyllys)\nforall x (Glassless(x) -> Ecstatic(x))\nforall x (Stigmatic(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Stigmatic(x) and Mitral(x) -> Pernickety(x))\n\nnot Pernickety(gracie)\n\ntherefore Pernickety(gracie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Dulciana is hygienic. Dulciana is amok. Dulciana is faineant. Elric is faineant. Elric is glutinous. Vivianna is pure. Vivianna is hygienic. All ruttish people are pure. All faineant people are hygienic. All faineant, hygienic people are amok. Elric is hygienic.", "logic": "\nHygienic(dulciana)\nAmok(dulciana)\nFaineant(dulciana)\nFaineant(elric)\nGlutinous(elric)\nPure(vivianna)\nHygienic(vivianna)\nforall x (Ruttish(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Faineant(x) -> Hygienic(x))\nforall x (Faineant(x) and Hygienic(x) -> Amok(x))\n\nHygienic(elric)\n\nFaineant(elric) and forall x (Faineant(x) -> Hygienic(x)) -> therefore Hygienic(elric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Anais is emaciated. Anais is sixth. Anais is quenched. Monique is quenched. Monique is pineal. Ophelie is gordian. Ophelie is emaciated. All ideal people are gordian. All quenched people are emaciated. All quenched, emaciated people are sixth. Monique is not emaciated.", "logic": "\nEmaciated(anais)\nSixth(anais)\nQuenched(anais)\nQuenched(monique)\nPineal(monique)\nGordian(ophelie)\nEmaciated(ophelie)\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Gordian(x))\nforall x (Quenched(x) -> Emaciated(x))\nforall x (Quenched(x) and Emaciated(x) -> Sixth(x))\n\nnot Emaciated(monique)\n\nQuenched(monique) and forall x (Quenched(x) -> Emaciated(x)) -> therefore Emaciated(monique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Reube is barehanded. Reube is rousseauan. Reube is myelinated. Ailene is myelinated. Ailene is prompt. Gert is custom. Gert is barehanded. All popular people are custom. All myelinated people are barehanded. All myelinated, barehanded people are rousseauan. Ailene is rousseauan.", "logic": "\nBarehanded(reube)\nRousseauan(reube)\nMyelinated(reube)\nMyelinated(ailene)\nPrompt(ailene)\nCustom(gert)\nBarehanded(gert)\nforall x (Popular(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and Barehanded(x) -> Rousseauan(x))\n\nRousseauan(ailene)\n\nMyelinated(ailene) and forall x (Myelinated(x) -> Barehanded(x)) -> therefore Barehanded(ailene) Myelinated(ailene) and Barehanded(ailene) and forall x (Myelinated(x) and Barehanded(x) -> Rousseauan(x)) -> therefore Rousseauan(ailene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Taddeo is heraldic. Taddeo is thrifty. Taddeo is varying. Kissie is varying. Kissie is polluted. Hyacinth is flavorful. Hyacinth is heraldic. All mealy people are flavorful. All varying people are heraldic. All varying, heraldic people are thrifty. Kissie is not thrifty.", "logic": "\nHeraldic(taddeo)\nThrifty(taddeo)\nVarying(taddeo)\nVarying(kissie)\nPolluted(kissie)\nFlavorful(hyacinth)\nHeraldic(hyacinth)\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> Flavorful(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) and Heraldic(x) -> Thrifty(x))\n\nnot Thrifty(kissie)\n\nVarying(kissie) and forall x (Varying(x) -> Heraldic(x)) -> therefore Heraldic(kissie) Varying(kissie) and Heraldic(kissie) and forall x (Varying(x) and Heraldic(x) -> Thrifty(x)) -> therefore Thrifty(kissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Wynn is canny. Wynn is dentate. Wynn is impudent. Editha is impudent. Editha is calcareous. Katalin is executable. Katalin is canny. All overweight people are executable. All impudent people are canny. All impudent, canny people are dentate. Wynn is not executable.", "logic": "\nCanny(wynn)\nDentate(wynn)\nImpudent(wynn)\nImpudent(editha)\nCalcareous(editha)\nExecutable(katalin)\nCanny(katalin)\nforall x (Overweight(x) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Canny(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Canny(x) -> Dentate(x))\n\nnot Executable(wynn)\n\nforall x (Overweight(x) -> Executable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Sharron is jihadi. Sharron is rebellious. Sharron is fitting. Darya is fitting. Darya is faveolate. Tanney is coiled. Tanney is jihadi. All hectic people are coiled. All fitting people are jihadi. All fitting, jihadi people are rebellious. Darya is coiled.", "logic": "\nJihadi(sharron)\nRebellious(sharron)\nFitting(sharron)\nFitting(darya)\nFaveolate(darya)\nCoiled(tanney)\nJihadi(tanney)\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Coiled(x))\nforall x (Fitting(x) -> Jihadi(x))\nforall x (Fitting(x) and Jihadi(x) -> Rebellious(x))\n\nCoiled(darya)\n\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Coiled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Isadore is senescent. Isadore is shambolic. Isadore is deific. Garey is deific. Garey is essential. Guthry is untitled. Guthry is senescent. All slovenly people are untitled. All deific people are senescent. All deific, senescent people are shambolic. Guthry is not shambolic.", "logic": "\nSenescent(isadore)\nShambolic(isadore)\nDeific(isadore)\nDeific(garey)\nEssential(garey)\nUntitled(guthry)\nSenescent(guthry)\nforall x (Slovenly(x) -> Untitled(x))\nforall x (Deific(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Deific(x) and Senescent(x) -> Shambolic(x))\n\nnot Shambolic(guthry)\n\nforall x (Deific(x) and Senescent(x) -> Shambolic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Jonathan is racking. Jonathan is harried. Jonathan is uncoated. Cathie is uncoated. Cathie is pectinate. Katusha is dipylon. Katusha is racking. All lowering people are dipylon. All uncoated people are racking. All uncoated, racking people are harried. Cathie is lowering.", "logic": "\nRacking(jonathan)\nHarried(jonathan)\nUncoated(jonathan)\nUncoated(cathie)\nPectinate(cathie)\nDipylon(katusha)\nRacking(katusha)\nforall x (Lowering(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Uncoated(x) -> Racking(x))\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and Racking(x) -> Harried(x))\n\nLowering(cathie)\n\nLowering(cathie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Sammie is spumy. Sammie is joyless. Sammie is unborn. Alf is unborn. Alf is ginger. Mead is plumlike. Mead is spumy. All enteral people are plumlike. All unborn people are spumy. All unborn, spumy people are joyless. Alf is not nice.", "logic": "\nSpumy(sammie)\nJoyless(sammie)\nUnborn(sammie)\nUnborn(alf)\nGinger(alf)\nPlumlike(mead)\nSpumy(mead)\nforall x (Enteral(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) -> Spumy(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) and Spumy(x) -> Joyless(x))\n\nnot Nice(alf)\n\nnot Nice(alf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "Broderic is witty. Broderic is forceful. Broderic is pizzicato. Charis is pizzicato. Charis is petaled. Orren is abreast. Orren is witty. All unnameable people are abreast. All pizzicato people are witty. All pizzicato, witty people are forceful. Orren is petaled.", "logic": "\nWitty(broderic)\nForceful(broderic)\nPizzicato(broderic)\nPizzicato(charis)\nPetaled(charis)\nAbreast(orren)\nWitty(orren)\nforall x (Unnameable(x) -> Abreast(x))\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) -> Witty(x))\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) and Witty(x) -> Forceful(x))\n\nPetaled(orren)\n\nPetaled(orren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-223"} {"premises": "The josephina enamel the marci. The darb initialise the marci. The marci dishearten the darb. If someone initialise the marci then they eat the darb. If someone is barehanded then they eat the darb. If someone dishearten the darb then the darb initialise the marci. If someone dishearten the josephina then the josephina does not chase the marci. If the darb does not chase the josephina then the darb enamel the josephina. If the marci enamel the josephina and the marci is not barehanded then the josephina dishearten the darb. If someone initialise the marci then the marci dishearten the josephina. If someone enamel the marci and they are not muciferous then they need the josephina. The marci dishearten the darb.", "logic": "\nEnamel(josephina, marci)\nInitialise(darb, marci)\nDishearten(marci, darb)\nforall x (Initialise(x, marci) -> Initialise(x, darb))\nforall x (Barehanded(x) -> Initialise(x, darb))\nforall x (Dishearten(x, darb) -> Initialise(darb, marci))\nforall x (Dishearten(x, josephina) -> not Dishearten(josephina, marci))\nnot Dishearten(darb, josephina) -> Enamel(darb, josephina)\nEnamel(marci, josephina) and not Barehanded(marci) -> Dishearten(josephina, darb)\nforall x (Initialise(x, marci) -> Dishearten(marci, josephina))\nforall x (Enamel(x, marci) and not Muciferous(x) -> Enamel(x, josephina))\n\nDishearten(marci, darb)\n\ntherefore Dishearten(marci, darb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The filmore prefigure the felipe. The rubina reveal the felipe. The felipe thurify the rubina. If someone reveal the felipe then they eat the rubina. If someone is sanious then they eat the rubina. If someone thurify the rubina then the rubina reveal the felipe. If someone thurify the filmore then the filmore does not chase the felipe. If the rubina does not chase the filmore then the rubina prefigure the filmore. If the felipe prefigure the filmore and the felipe is not sanious then the filmore thurify the rubina. If someone reveal the felipe then the felipe thurify the filmore. If someone prefigure the felipe and they are not grumous then they need the filmore. The filmore does not need the felipe.", "logic": "\nPrefigure(filmore, felipe)\nReveal(rubina, felipe)\nThurify(felipe, rubina)\nforall x (Reveal(x, felipe) -> Reveal(x, rubina))\nforall x (Sanious(x) -> Reveal(x, rubina))\nforall x (Thurify(x, rubina) -> Reveal(rubina, felipe))\nforall x (Thurify(x, filmore) -> not Thurify(filmore, felipe))\nnot Thurify(rubina, filmore) -> Prefigure(rubina, filmore)\nPrefigure(felipe, filmore) and not Sanious(felipe) -> Thurify(filmore, rubina)\nforall x (Reveal(x, felipe) -> Thurify(felipe, filmore))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, felipe) and not Grumous(x) -> Prefigure(x, filmore))\n\nnot Prefigure(filmore, felipe)\n\ntherefore Prefigure(filmore, felipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The kinna cantillate the hendrika. The royce brisken the hendrika. The hendrika quiz the royce. If someone brisken the hendrika then they eat the royce. If someone is unanimous then they eat the royce. If someone quiz the royce then the royce brisken the hendrika. If someone quiz the kinna then the kinna does not chase the hendrika. If the royce does not chase the kinna then the royce cantillate the kinna. If the hendrika cantillate the kinna and the hendrika is not unanimous then the kinna quiz the royce. If someone brisken the hendrika then the hendrika quiz the kinna. If someone cantillate the hendrika and they are not mandatory then they need the kinna. The hendrika quiz the kinna.", "logic": "\nCantillate(kinna, hendrika)\nBrisken(royce, hendrika)\nQuiz(hendrika, royce)\nforall x (Brisken(x, hendrika) -> Brisken(x, royce))\nforall x (Unanimous(x) -> Brisken(x, royce))\nforall x (Quiz(x, royce) -> Brisken(royce, hendrika))\nforall x (Quiz(x, kinna) -> not Quiz(kinna, hendrika))\nnot Quiz(royce, kinna) -> Cantillate(royce, kinna)\nCantillate(hendrika, kinna) and not Unanimous(hendrika) -> Quiz(kinna, royce)\nforall x (Brisken(x, hendrika) -> Quiz(hendrika, kinna))\nforall x (Cantillate(x, hendrika) and not Mandatory(x) -> Cantillate(x, kinna))\n\nQuiz(hendrika, kinna)\n\nBrisken(royce, hendrika) and forall x (Brisken(x, hendrika) -> Quiz(hendrika, kinna)) -> therefore Quiz(hendrika, kinna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The dominic room the kellsie. The yolande dissatisfy the kellsie. The kellsie foray the yolande. If someone dissatisfy the kellsie then they eat the yolande. If someone is epicyclic then they eat the yolande. If someone foray the yolande then the yolande dissatisfy the kellsie. If someone foray the dominic then the dominic does not chase the kellsie. If the yolande does not chase the dominic then the yolande room the dominic. If the kellsie room the dominic and the kellsie is not epicyclic then the dominic foray the yolande. If someone dissatisfy the kellsie then the kellsie foray the dominic. If someone room the kellsie and they are not vitrified then they need the dominic. The yolande does not eat the yolande.", "logic": "\nRoom(dominic, kellsie)\nDissatisfy(yolande, kellsie)\nForay(kellsie, yolande)\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, kellsie) -> Dissatisfy(x, yolande))\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) -> Dissatisfy(x, yolande))\nforall x (Foray(x, yolande) -> Dissatisfy(yolande, kellsie))\nforall x (Foray(x, dominic) -> not Foray(dominic, kellsie))\nnot Foray(yolande, dominic) -> Room(yolande, dominic)\nRoom(kellsie, dominic) and not Epicyclic(kellsie) -> Foray(dominic, yolande)\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, kellsie) -> Foray(kellsie, dominic))\nforall x (Room(x, kellsie) and not Vitrified(x) -> Room(x, dominic))\n\nnot Dissatisfy(yolande, yolande)\n\nDissatisfy(yolande, kellsie) and forall x (Dissatisfy(x, kellsie) -> Dissatisfy(x, yolande)) -> therefore Dissatisfy(yolande, yolande)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The carrie display the nixie. The clarisse transit the nixie. The nixie sting the clarisse. If someone transit the nixie then they eat the clarisse. If someone is uniovulate then they eat the clarisse. If someone sting the clarisse then the clarisse transit the nixie. If someone sting the carrie then the carrie does not chase the nixie. If the clarisse does not chase the carrie then the clarisse display the carrie. If the nixie display the carrie and the nixie is not uniovulate then the carrie sting the clarisse. If someone transit the nixie then the nixie sting the carrie. If someone display the nixie and they are not unbrushed then they need the carrie. The carrie does not chase the nixie.", "logic": "\nDisplay(carrie, nixie)\nTransit(clarisse, nixie)\nSting(nixie, clarisse)\nforall x (Transit(x, nixie) -> Transit(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> Transit(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Sting(x, clarisse) -> Transit(clarisse, nixie))\nforall x (Sting(x, carrie) -> not Sting(carrie, nixie))\nnot Sting(clarisse, carrie) -> Display(clarisse, carrie)\nDisplay(nixie, carrie) and not Uniovulate(nixie) -> Sting(carrie, clarisse)\nforall x (Transit(x, nixie) -> Sting(nixie, carrie))\nforall x (Display(x, nixie) and not Unbrushed(x) -> Display(x, carrie))\n\nnot Sting(carrie, nixie)\n\nTransit(clarisse, nixie) and forall x (Transit(x, nixie) -> Sting(nixie, carrie)) -> therefore Sting(nixie, carrie) Sting(nixie, carrie) and forall x (Sting(x, carrie) -> not Sting(carrie, nixie)) -> therefore not Sting(carrie, nixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The canada appraise the stephana. The adella dance the stephana. The stephana purvey the adella. If someone dance the stephana then they eat the adella. If someone is mellow then they eat the adella. If someone purvey the adella then the adella dance the stephana. If someone purvey the canada then the canada does not chase the stephana. If the adella does not chase the canada then the adella appraise the canada. If the stephana appraise the canada and the stephana is not mellow then the canada purvey the adella. If someone dance the stephana then the stephana purvey the canada. If someone appraise the stephana and they are not pale then they need the canada. The canada purvey the stephana.", "logic": "\nAppraise(canada, stephana)\nDance(adella, stephana)\nPurvey(stephana, adella)\nforall x (Dance(x, stephana) -> Dance(x, adella))\nforall x (Mellow(x) -> Dance(x, adella))\nforall x (Purvey(x, adella) -> Dance(adella, stephana))\nforall x (Purvey(x, canada) -> not Purvey(canada, stephana))\nnot Purvey(adella, canada) -> Appraise(adella, canada)\nAppraise(stephana, canada) and not Mellow(stephana) -> Purvey(canada, adella)\nforall x (Dance(x, stephana) -> Purvey(stephana, canada))\nforall x (Appraise(x, stephana) and not Pale(x) -> Appraise(x, canada))\n\nPurvey(canada, stephana)\n\nDance(adella, stephana) and forall x (Dance(x, stephana) -> Purvey(stephana, canada)) -> therefore Purvey(stephana, canada) Purvey(stephana, canada) and forall x (Purvey(x, canada) -> not Purvey(canada, stephana)) -> therefore not Purvey(canada, stephana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The kane deduct the angelita. The rochella register the angelita. The angelita step the rochella. If someone register the angelita then they eat the rochella. If someone is ineffable then they eat the rochella. If someone step the rochella then the rochella register the angelita. If someone step the kane then the kane does not chase the angelita. If the rochella does not chase the kane then the rochella deduct the kane. If the angelita deduct the kane and the angelita is not ineffable then the kane step the rochella. If someone register the angelita then the angelita step the kane. If someone deduct the angelita and they are not bahraini then they need the kane. The rochella does not need the kane.", "logic": "\nDeduct(kane, angelita)\nRegister(rochella, angelita)\nStep(angelita, rochella)\nforall x (Register(x, angelita) -> Register(x, rochella))\nforall x (Ineffable(x) -> Register(x, rochella))\nforall x (Step(x, rochella) -> Register(rochella, angelita))\nforall x (Step(x, kane) -> not Step(kane, angelita))\nnot Step(rochella, kane) -> Deduct(rochella, kane)\nDeduct(angelita, kane) and not Ineffable(angelita) -> Step(kane, rochella)\nforall x (Register(x, angelita) -> Step(angelita, kane))\nforall x (Deduct(x, angelita) and not Bahraini(x) -> Deduct(x, kane))\n\nnot Deduct(rochella, kane)\n\nnot Step(rochella, kane) -> Deduct(rochella, kane) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The reece devilize the tiffy. The averyl confer the tiffy. The tiffy scrutinize the averyl. If someone confer the tiffy then they eat the averyl. If someone is froward then they eat the averyl. If someone scrutinize the averyl then the averyl confer the tiffy. If someone scrutinize the reece then the reece does not chase the tiffy. If the averyl does not chase the reece then the averyl devilize the reece. If the tiffy devilize the reece and the tiffy is not froward then the reece scrutinize the averyl. If someone confer the tiffy then the tiffy scrutinize the reece. If someone devilize the tiffy and they are not hyaloid then they need the reece. The reece confer the averyl.", "logic": "\nDevilize(reece, tiffy)\nConfer(averyl, tiffy)\nScrutinize(tiffy, averyl)\nforall x (Confer(x, tiffy) -> Confer(x, averyl))\nforall x (Froward(x) -> Confer(x, averyl))\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, averyl) -> Confer(averyl, tiffy))\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, reece) -> not Scrutinize(reece, tiffy))\nnot Scrutinize(averyl, reece) -> Devilize(averyl, reece)\nDevilize(tiffy, reece) and not Froward(tiffy) -> Scrutinize(reece, averyl)\nforall x (Confer(x, tiffy) -> Scrutinize(tiffy, reece))\nforall x (Devilize(x, tiffy) and not Hyaloid(x) -> Devilize(x, reece))\n\nConfer(reece, averyl)\n\nforall x (Confer(x, tiffy) -> Confer(x, averyl)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The danila iron the tomi. The sonja snowball the tomi. The tomi regret the sonja. If someone snowball the tomi then they eat the sonja. If someone is rearward then they eat the sonja. If someone regret the sonja then the sonja snowball the tomi. If someone regret the danila then the danila does not chase the tomi. If the sonja does not chase the danila then the sonja iron the danila. If the tomi iron the danila and the tomi is not rearward then the danila regret the sonja. If someone snowball the tomi then the tomi regret the danila. If someone iron the tomi and they are not vasiform then they need the danila. The tomi does not eat the sonja.", "logic": "\nIron(danila, tomi)\nSnowball(sonja, tomi)\nRegret(tomi, sonja)\nforall x (Snowball(x, tomi) -> Snowball(x, sonja))\nforall x (Rearward(x) -> Snowball(x, sonja))\nforall x (Regret(x, sonja) -> Snowball(sonja, tomi))\nforall x (Regret(x, danila) -> not Regret(danila, tomi))\nnot Regret(sonja, danila) -> Iron(sonja, danila)\nIron(tomi, danila) and not Rearward(tomi) -> Regret(danila, sonja)\nforall x (Snowball(x, tomi) -> Regret(tomi, danila))\nforall x (Iron(x, tomi) and not Vasiform(x) -> Iron(x, danila))\n\nnot Snowball(tomi, sonja)\n\nforall x (Snowball(x, tomi) -> Snowball(x, sonja)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The jannel camphorate the valentine. The evette dehumanize the valentine. The valentine bower the evette. If someone dehumanize the valentine then they eat the evette. If someone is devoted then they eat the evette. If someone bower the evette then the evette dehumanize the valentine. If someone bower the jannel then the jannel does not chase the valentine. If the evette does not chase the jannel then the evette camphorate the jannel. If the valentine camphorate the jannel and the valentine is not devoted then the jannel bower the evette. If someone dehumanize the valentine then the valentine bower the jannel. If someone camphorate the valentine and they are not docile then they need the jannel. The valentine is kind.", "logic": "\nCamphorate(jannel, valentine)\nDehumanize(evette, valentine)\nBower(valentine, evette)\nforall x (Dehumanize(x, valentine) -> Dehumanize(x, evette))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Dehumanize(x, evette))\nforall x (Bower(x, evette) -> Dehumanize(evette, valentine))\nforall x (Bower(x, jannel) -> not Bower(jannel, valentine))\nnot Bower(evette, jannel) -> Camphorate(evette, jannel)\nCamphorate(valentine, jannel) and not Devoted(valentine) -> Bower(jannel, evette)\nforall x (Dehumanize(x, valentine) -> Bower(valentine, jannel))\nforall x (Camphorate(x, valentine) and not Docile(x) -> Camphorate(x, jannel))\n\nKind(valentine)\n\nKind(valentine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The roland surveil the monte. The katinka debug the monte. The monte roam the katinka. If someone debug the monte then they eat the katinka. If someone is pronged then they eat the katinka. If someone roam the katinka then the katinka debug the monte. If someone roam the roland then the roland does not chase the monte. If the katinka does not chase the roland then the katinka surveil the roland. If the monte surveil the roland and the monte is not pronged then the roland roam the katinka. If someone debug the monte then the monte roam the roland. If someone surveil the monte and they are not structural then they need the roland. The katinka does not need the katinka.", "logic": "\nSurveil(roland, monte)\nDebug(katinka, monte)\nRoam(monte, katinka)\nforall x (Debug(x, monte) -> Debug(x, katinka))\nforall x (Pronged(x) -> Debug(x, katinka))\nforall x (Roam(x, katinka) -> Debug(katinka, monte))\nforall x (Roam(x, roland) -> not Roam(roland, monte))\nnot Roam(katinka, roland) -> Surveil(katinka, roland)\nSurveil(monte, roland) and not Pronged(monte) -> Roam(roland, katinka)\nforall x (Debug(x, monte) -> Roam(monte, roland))\nforall x (Surveil(x, monte) and not Structural(x) -> Surveil(x, roland))\n\nnot Surveil(katinka, katinka)\n\nnot Surveil(katinka, katinka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The clarisa alliterate the erina. The randie prink the erina. The erina embroider the randie. If someone prink the erina then they eat the randie. If someone is pondering then they eat the randie. If someone embroider the randie then the randie prink the erina. If someone embroider the clarisa then the clarisa does not chase the erina. If the randie does not chase the clarisa then the randie alliterate the clarisa. If the erina alliterate the clarisa and the erina is not pondering then the clarisa embroider the randie. If someone prink the erina then the erina embroider the clarisa. If someone alliterate the erina and they are not pillared then they need the clarisa. The randie embroider the randie.", "logic": "\nAlliterate(clarisa, erina)\nPrink(randie, erina)\nEmbroider(erina, randie)\nforall x (Prink(x, erina) -> Prink(x, randie))\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> Prink(x, randie))\nforall x (Embroider(x, randie) -> Prink(randie, erina))\nforall x (Embroider(x, clarisa) -> not Embroider(clarisa, erina))\nnot Embroider(randie, clarisa) -> Alliterate(randie, clarisa)\nAlliterate(erina, clarisa) and not Pondering(erina) -> Embroider(clarisa, randie)\nforall x (Prink(x, erina) -> Embroider(erina, clarisa))\nforall x (Alliterate(x, erina) and not Pillared(x) -> Alliterate(x, clarisa))\n\nEmbroider(randie, randie)\n\nEmbroider(randie, randie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "Micky is contrived. Micky is wordy. Micky is xxix. Micky is whiny. Micky is nonstick. Micky is uxorial. Ofelia is contrived. Ofelia is wordy. Ofelia is whiny. Ofelia is dosed. Sawyere is contrived. Sawyere is xxix. Sawyere is nonstick. Iolande is nonstick. Iolande is uxorial. If something is nonstick and xxix then it is whiny. Nice things are whiny. If Iolande is uxorial and Iolande is nonstick then Iolande is contrived. If Sawyere is contrived then Sawyere is nonstick. If something is xxix and whiny then it is wordy. All dosed things are wordy. Ofelia is contrived.", "logic": "\nContrived(micky)\nWordy(micky)\nXxix(micky)\nWhiny(micky)\nNonstick(micky)\nUxorial(micky)\nContrived(ofelia)\nWordy(ofelia)\nWhiny(ofelia)\nDosed(ofelia)\nContrived(sawyere)\nXxix(sawyere)\nNonstick(sawyere)\nNonstick(iolande)\nUxorial(iolande)\nforall x (Nonstick(x) and Xxix(x) -> Whiny(x))\nforall x (Xxix(x) -> Whiny(x))\nUxorial(iolande) and Nonstick(iolande) -> Contrived(iolande)\nContrived(sawyere) -> Nonstick(sawyere)\nforall x (Xxix(x) and Whiny(x) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) -> Wordy(x))\n\nContrived(ofelia)\n\ntherefore Contrived(ofelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Korie is above. Korie is filled. Korie is faraway. Korie is lost. Korie is visceral. Korie is totaled. Arly is above. Arly is filled. Arly is lost. Arly is swell. Prasun is above. Prasun is faraway. Prasun is visceral. Myrah is visceral. Myrah is totaled. If something is visceral and faraway then it is lost. Nice things are lost. If Myrah is totaled and Myrah is visceral then Myrah is above. If Prasun is above then Prasun is visceral. If something is faraway and lost then it is filled. All swell things are filled. Korie is not above.", "logic": "\nAbove(korie)\nFilled(korie)\nFaraway(korie)\nLost(korie)\nVisceral(korie)\nTotaled(korie)\nAbove(arly)\nFilled(arly)\nLost(arly)\nSwell(arly)\nAbove(prasun)\nFaraway(prasun)\nVisceral(prasun)\nVisceral(myrah)\nTotaled(myrah)\nforall x (Visceral(x) and Faraway(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Faraway(x) -> Lost(x))\nTotaled(myrah) and Visceral(myrah) -> Above(myrah)\nAbove(prasun) -> Visceral(prasun)\nforall x (Faraway(x) and Lost(x) -> Filled(x))\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Filled(x))\n\nnot Above(korie)\n\ntherefore Above(korie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Wynton is metonymic. Wynton is lordless. Wynton is jingling. Wynton is precatory. Wynton is avaricious. Wynton is idempotent. Mair is metonymic. Mair is lordless. Mair is precatory. Mair is medullated. Tremaine is metonymic. Tremaine is jingling. Tremaine is avaricious. Lucie is avaricious. Lucie is idempotent. If something is avaricious and jingling then it is precatory. Nice things are precatory. If Lucie is idempotent and Lucie is avaricious then Lucie is metonymic. If Tremaine is metonymic then Tremaine is avaricious. If something is jingling and precatory then it is lordless. All medullated things are lordless. Tremaine is precatory.", "logic": "\nMetonymic(wynton)\nLordless(wynton)\nJingling(wynton)\nPrecatory(wynton)\nAvaricious(wynton)\nIdempotent(wynton)\nMetonymic(mair)\nLordless(mair)\nPrecatory(mair)\nMedullated(mair)\nMetonymic(tremaine)\nJingling(tremaine)\nAvaricious(tremaine)\nAvaricious(lucie)\nIdempotent(lucie)\nforall x (Avaricious(x) and Jingling(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Jingling(x) -> Precatory(x))\nIdempotent(lucie) and Avaricious(lucie) -> Metonymic(lucie)\nMetonymic(tremaine) -> Avaricious(tremaine)\nforall x (Jingling(x) and Precatory(x) -> Lordless(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Lordless(x))\n\nPrecatory(tremaine)\n\nJingling(tremaine) and forall x (Jingling(x) -> Precatory(x)) -> therefore Precatory(tremaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Lanie is patriotic. Lanie is polygonal. Lanie is awash. Lanie is lxxi. Lanie is bulging. Lanie is trifid. Dael is patriotic. Dael is polygonal. Dael is lxxi. Dael is broke. Melba is patriotic. Melba is awash. Melba is bulging. Rochette is bulging. Rochette is trifid. If something is bulging and awash then it is lxxi. Nice things are lxxi. If Rochette is trifid and Rochette is bulging then Rochette is patriotic. If Melba is patriotic then Melba is bulging. If something is awash and lxxi then it is polygonal. All broke things are polygonal. Melba is not lxxi.", "logic": "\nPatriotic(lanie)\nPolygonal(lanie)\nAwash(lanie)\nLxxi(lanie)\nBulging(lanie)\nTrifid(lanie)\nPatriotic(dael)\nPolygonal(dael)\nLxxi(dael)\nBroke(dael)\nPatriotic(melba)\nAwash(melba)\nBulging(melba)\nBulging(rochette)\nTrifid(rochette)\nforall x (Bulging(x) and Awash(x) -> Lxxi(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) -> Lxxi(x))\nTrifid(rochette) and Bulging(rochette) -> Patriotic(rochette)\nPatriotic(melba) -> Bulging(melba)\nforall x (Awash(x) and Lxxi(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Polygonal(x))\n\nnot Lxxi(melba)\n\nAwash(melba) and forall x (Awash(x) -> Lxxi(x)) -> therefore Lxxi(melba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Gilli is nestorian. Gilli is acaudal. Gilli is apogametic. Gilli is calico. Gilli is bony. Gilli is shona. Hewitt is nestorian. Hewitt is acaudal. Hewitt is calico. Hewitt is upstanding. Serene is nestorian. Serene is apogametic. Serene is bony. Churchill is bony. Churchill is shona. If something is bony and apogametic then it is calico. Nice things are calico. If Churchill is shona and Churchill is bony then Churchill is nestorian. If Serene is nestorian then Serene is bony. If something is apogametic and calico then it is acaudal. All upstanding things are acaudal. Serene is acaudal.", "logic": "\nNestorian(gilli)\nAcaudal(gilli)\nApogametic(gilli)\nCalico(gilli)\nBony(gilli)\nShona(gilli)\nNestorian(hewitt)\nAcaudal(hewitt)\nCalico(hewitt)\nUpstanding(hewitt)\nNestorian(serene)\nApogametic(serene)\nBony(serene)\nBony(churchill)\nShona(churchill)\nforall x (Bony(x) and Apogametic(x) -> Calico(x))\nforall x (Apogametic(x) -> Calico(x))\nShona(churchill) and Bony(churchill) -> Nestorian(churchill)\nNestorian(serene) -> Bony(serene)\nforall x (Apogametic(x) and Calico(x) -> Acaudal(x))\nforall x (Upstanding(x) -> Acaudal(x))\n\nAcaudal(serene)\n\nApogametic(serene) and forall x (Apogametic(x) -> Calico(x)) -> therefore Calico(serene) Apogametic(serene) and Calico(serene) and forall x (Apogametic(x) and Calico(x) -> Acaudal(x)) -> therefore Acaudal(serene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Durward is indisposed. Durward is gibbous. Durward is soignee. Durward is toothy. Durward is addlepated. Durward is defiant. Gwendolyn is indisposed. Gwendolyn is gibbous. Gwendolyn is toothy. Gwendolyn is recovering. Kesley is indisposed. Kesley is soignee. Kesley is addlepated. Kay is addlepated. Kay is defiant. If something is addlepated and soignee then it is toothy. Nice things are toothy. If Kay is defiant and Kay is addlepated then Kay is indisposed. If Kesley is indisposed then Kesley is addlepated. If something is soignee and toothy then it is gibbous. All recovering things are gibbous. Kesley is not gibbous.", "logic": "\nIndisposed(durward)\nGibbous(durward)\nSoignee(durward)\nToothy(durward)\nAddlepated(durward)\nDefiant(durward)\nIndisposed(gwendolyn)\nGibbous(gwendolyn)\nToothy(gwendolyn)\nRecovering(gwendolyn)\nIndisposed(kesley)\nSoignee(kesley)\nAddlepated(kesley)\nAddlepated(kay)\nDefiant(kay)\nforall x (Addlepated(x) and Soignee(x) -> Toothy(x))\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Toothy(x))\nDefiant(kay) and Addlepated(kay) -> Indisposed(kay)\nIndisposed(kesley) -> Addlepated(kesley)\nforall x (Soignee(x) and Toothy(x) -> Gibbous(x))\nforall x (Recovering(x) -> Gibbous(x))\n\nnot Gibbous(kesley)\n\nSoignee(kesley) and forall x (Soignee(x) -> Toothy(x)) -> therefore Toothy(kesley) Soignee(kesley) and Toothy(kesley) and forall x (Soignee(x) and Toothy(x) -> Gibbous(x)) -> therefore Gibbous(kesley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Petronia is catapultic. Petronia is firstborn. Petronia is foliaged. Petronia is assertive. Petronia is clouded. Petronia is cognizant. Gusty is catapultic. Gusty is firstborn. Gusty is assertive. Gusty is ataractic. Fayette is catapultic. Fayette is foliaged. Fayette is clouded. Ninetta is clouded. Ninetta is cognizant. If something is clouded and foliaged then it is assertive. Nice things are assertive. If Ninetta is cognizant and Ninetta is clouded then Ninetta is catapultic. If Fayette is catapultic then Fayette is clouded. If something is foliaged and assertive then it is firstborn. All ataractic things are firstborn. Ninetta is not assertive.", "logic": "\nCatapultic(petronia)\nFirstborn(petronia)\nFoliaged(petronia)\nAssertive(petronia)\nClouded(petronia)\nCognizant(petronia)\nCatapultic(gusty)\nFirstborn(gusty)\nAssertive(gusty)\nAtaractic(gusty)\nCatapultic(fayette)\nFoliaged(fayette)\nClouded(fayette)\nClouded(ninetta)\nCognizant(ninetta)\nforall x (Clouded(x) and Foliaged(x) -> Assertive(x))\nforall x (Foliaged(x) -> Assertive(x))\nCognizant(ninetta) and Clouded(ninetta) -> Catapultic(ninetta)\nCatapultic(fayette) -> Clouded(fayette)\nforall x (Foliaged(x) and Assertive(x) -> Firstborn(x))\nforall x (Ataractic(x) -> Firstborn(x))\n\nnot Assertive(ninetta)\n\nforall x (Clouded(x) and Foliaged(x) -> Assertive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Stormi is libellous. Stormi is bilingual. Stormi is namibian. Stormi is childly. Stormi is silverish. Stormi is pendent. Galina is libellous. Galina is bilingual. Galina is childly. Galina is dreaded. Tresa is libellous. Tresa is namibian. Tresa is silverish. Averil is silverish. Averil is pendent. If something is silverish and namibian then it is childly. Nice things are childly. If Averil is pendent and Averil is silverish then Averil is libellous. If Tresa is libellous then Tresa is silverish. If something is namibian and childly then it is bilingual. All dreaded things are bilingual. Averil is bilingual.", "logic": "\nLibellous(stormi)\nBilingual(stormi)\nNamibian(stormi)\nChildly(stormi)\nSilverish(stormi)\nPendent(stormi)\nLibellous(galina)\nBilingual(galina)\nChildly(galina)\nDreaded(galina)\nLibellous(tresa)\nNamibian(tresa)\nSilverish(tresa)\nSilverish(averil)\nPendent(averil)\nforall x (Silverish(x) and Namibian(x) -> Childly(x))\nforall x (Namibian(x) -> Childly(x))\nPendent(averil) and Silverish(averil) -> Libellous(averil)\nLibellous(tresa) -> Silverish(tresa)\nforall x (Namibian(x) and Childly(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Bilingual(x))\n\nBilingual(averil)\n\nforall x (Namibian(x) and Childly(x) -> Bilingual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Laurene is unfaithful. Laurene is lumbering. Laurene is binaural. Laurene is notched. Laurene is enforced. Laurene is fractional. Rosalinde is unfaithful. Rosalinde is lumbering. Rosalinde is notched. Rosalinde is metameric. Aron is unfaithful. Aron is binaural. Aron is enforced. Claus is enforced. Claus is fractional. If something is enforced and binaural then it is notched. Nice things are notched. If Claus is fractional and Claus is enforced then Claus is unfaithful. If Aron is unfaithful then Aron is enforced. If something is binaural and notched then it is lumbering. All metameric things are lumbering. Rosalinde is not fractional.", "logic": "\nUnfaithful(laurene)\nLumbering(laurene)\nBinaural(laurene)\nNotched(laurene)\nEnforced(laurene)\nFractional(laurene)\nUnfaithful(rosalinde)\nLumbering(rosalinde)\nNotched(rosalinde)\nMetameric(rosalinde)\nUnfaithful(aron)\nBinaural(aron)\nEnforced(aron)\nEnforced(claus)\nFractional(claus)\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Binaural(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Notched(x))\nFractional(claus) and Enforced(claus) -> Unfaithful(claus)\nUnfaithful(aron) -> Enforced(aron)\nforall x (Binaural(x) and Notched(x) -> Lumbering(x))\nforall x (Metameric(x) -> Lumbering(x))\n\nnot Fractional(rosalinde)\n\nnot Fractional(rosalinde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Alma is hedonic. Alma is hominid. Alma is reddened. Alma is shadowed. Alma is fleshly. Alma is both. Theresita is hedonic. Theresita is hominid. Theresita is shadowed. Theresita is isotropic. Tiana is hedonic. Tiana is reddened. Tiana is fleshly. Webb is fleshly. Webb is both. If something is fleshly and reddened then it is shadowed. Nice things are shadowed. If Webb is both and Webb is fleshly then Webb is hedonic. If Tiana is hedonic then Tiana is fleshly. If something is reddened and shadowed then it is hominid. All isotropic things are hominid. Tiana is both.", "logic": "\nHedonic(alma)\nHominid(alma)\nReddened(alma)\nShadowed(alma)\nFleshly(alma)\nBoth(alma)\nHedonic(theresita)\nHominid(theresita)\nShadowed(theresita)\nIsotropic(theresita)\nHedonic(tiana)\nReddened(tiana)\nFleshly(tiana)\nFleshly(webb)\nBoth(webb)\nforall x (Fleshly(x) and Reddened(x) -> Shadowed(x))\nforall x (Reddened(x) -> Shadowed(x))\nBoth(webb) and Fleshly(webb) -> Hedonic(webb)\nHedonic(tiana) -> Fleshly(tiana)\nforall x (Reddened(x) and Shadowed(x) -> Hominid(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) -> Hominid(x))\n\nBoth(tiana)\n\nBoth(tiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Francis is solomonic. Francis is cimmerian. Francis is panicled. Francis is congeneric. Francis is cognisant. Francis is acephalous. Ruben is solomonic. Ruben is cimmerian. Ruben is congeneric. Ruben is adsorbate. Harriette is solomonic. Harriette is panicled. Harriette is cognisant. Thorvald is cognisant. Thorvald is acephalous. If something is cognisant and panicled then it is congeneric. Nice things are congeneric. If Thorvald is acephalous and Thorvald is cognisant then Thorvald is solomonic. If Harriette is solomonic then Harriette is cognisant. If something is panicled and congeneric then it is cimmerian. All adsorbate things are cimmerian. Harriette is not adsorbate.", "logic": "\nSolomonic(francis)\nCimmerian(francis)\nPanicled(francis)\nCongeneric(francis)\nCognisant(francis)\nAcephalous(francis)\nSolomonic(ruben)\nCimmerian(ruben)\nCongeneric(ruben)\nAdsorbate(ruben)\nSolomonic(harriette)\nPanicled(harriette)\nCognisant(harriette)\nCognisant(thorvald)\nAcephalous(thorvald)\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and Panicled(x) -> Congeneric(x))\nforall x (Panicled(x) -> Congeneric(x))\nAcephalous(thorvald) and Cognisant(thorvald) -> Solomonic(thorvald)\nSolomonic(harriette) -> Cognisant(harriette)\nforall x (Panicled(x) and Congeneric(x) -> Cimmerian(x))\nforall x (Adsorbate(x) -> Cimmerian(x))\n\nnot Adsorbate(harriette)\n\nnot Adsorbate(harriette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Veronika is smuggled. Veronika is metastable. Veronika is sliding. Veronika is recurring. Veronika is above. Veronika is ammino. Lisette is smuggled. Lisette is metastable. Lisette is recurring. Lisette is undying. Vladimir is smuggled. Vladimir is sliding. Vladimir is above. Indira is above. Indira is ammino. If something is above and sliding then it is recurring. Nice things are recurring. If Indira is ammino and Indira is above then Indira is smuggled. If Vladimir is smuggled then Vladimir is above. If something is sliding and recurring then it is metastable. All undying things are metastable. Veronika is undying.", "logic": "\nSmuggled(veronika)\nMetastable(veronika)\nSliding(veronika)\nRecurring(veronika)\nAbove(veronika)\nAmmino(veronika)\nSmuggled(lisette)\nMetastable(lisette)\nRecurring(lisette)\nUndying(lisette)\nSmuggled(vladimir)\nSliding(vladimir)\nAbove(vladimir)\nAbove(indira)\nAmmino(indira)\nforall x (Above(x) and Sliding(x) -> Recurring(x))\nforall x (Sliding(x) -> Recurring(x))\nAmmino(indira) and Above(indira) -> Smuggled(indira)\nSmuggled(vladimir) -> Above(vladimir)\nforall x (Sliding(x) and Recurring(x) -> Metastable(x))\nforall x (Undying(x) -> Metastable(x))\n\nUndying(veronika)\n\nUndying(veronika) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1024"} {"premises": "Haley is atilt. Esteban is licentious. Selie is not gruelling. Isahella is not licentious. Big things are splashy. All beggarly things are splashy. If something is atilt then it is licentious. If something is licentious then it is not utilized. If something is licentious and not annexal then it is not atilt. If something is splashy and not gruelling then it is atilt. Isahella is not licentious.", "logic": "\nAtilt(haley)\nLicentious(esteban)\nnot Gruelling(selie)\nnot Licentious(isahella)\nforall x (Gruelling(x) -> Splashy(x))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Splashy(x))\nforall x (Atilt(x) -> Licentious(x))\nforall x (Licentious(x) -> not Utilized(x))\nforall x (Licentious(x) and not Annexal(x) -> not Atilt(x))\nforall x (Splashy(x) and not Gruelling(x) -> Atilt(x))\n\nnot Licentious(isahella)\n\ntherefore not Licentious(isahella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Querida is unlined. Mellisa is acapnic. Dyan is not amative. Windham is not acapnic. Big things are synergetic. All halt things are synergetic. If something is unlined then it is acapnic. If something is acapnic then it is not spheric. If something is acapnic and not reflexed then it is not unlined. If something is synergetic and not amative then it is unlined. Windham is acapnic.", "logic": "\nUnlined(querida)\nAcapnic(mellisa)\nnot Amative(dyan)\nnot Acapnic(windham)\nforall x (Amative(x) -> Synergetic(x))\nforall x (Halt(x) -> Synergetic(x))\nforall x (Unlined(x) -> Acapnic(x))\nforall x (Acapnic(x) -> not Spheric(x))\nforall x (Acapnic(x) and not Reflexed(x) -> not Unlined(x))\nforall x (Synergetic(x) and not Amative(x) -> Unlined(x))\n\nAcapnic(windham)\n\ntherefore not Acapnic(windham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Randell is puerile. Tybie is lavender. Weslie is not bland. Avie is not lavender. Big things are scalable. All banner things are scalable. If something is puerile then it is lavender. If something is lavender then it is not volcanic. If something is lavender and not printable then it is not puerile. If something is scalable and not bland then it is puerile. Tybie is not volcanic.", "logic": "\nPuerile(randell)\nLavender(tybie)\nnot Bland(weslie)\nnot Lavender(avie)\nforall x (Bland(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Banner(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) -> Lavender(x))\nforall x (Lavender(x) -> not Volcanic(x))\nforall x (Lavender(x) and not Printable(x) -> not Puerile(x))\nforall x (Scalable(x) and not Bland(x) -> Puerile(x))\n\nnot Volcanic(tybie)\n\nLavender(tybie) and forall x (Lavender(x) -> not Volcanic(x)) -> therefore not Volcanic(tybie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Deedee is feral. Thorsten is pussy. Nessy is not czaristic. Tootsie is not pussy. Big things are splashed. All parotid things are splashed. If something is feral then it is pussy. If something is pussy then it is not dried. If something is pussy and not bruising then it is not feral. If something is splashed and not czaristic then it is feral. Thorsten is dried.", "logic": "\nFeral(deedee)\nPussy(thorsten)\nnot Czaristic(nessy)\nnot Pussy(tootsie)\nforall x (Czaristic(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Parotid(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Feral(x) -> Pussy(x))\nforall x (Pussy(x) -> not Dried(x))\nforall x (Pussy(x) and not Bruising(x) -> not Feral(x))\nforall x (Splashed(x) and not Czaristic(x) -> Feral(x))\n\nDried(thorsten)\n\nPussy(thorsten) and forall x (Pussy(x) -> not Dried(x)) -> therefore not Dried(thorsten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Iggie is ostensible. Marry is condylar. Shelagh is not achromous. Kattie is not condylar. Big things are freelance. All sellable things are freelance. If something is ostensible then it is condylar. If something is condylar then it is not demeaning. If something is condylar and not conjoint then it is not ostensible. If something is freelance and not achromous then it is ostensible. Iggie is not demeaning.", "logic": "\nOstensible(iggie)\nCondylar(marry)\nnot Achromous(shelagh)\nnot Condylar(kattie)\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Sellable(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Ostensible(x) -> Condylar(x))\nforall x (Condylar(x) -> not Demeaning(x))\nforall x (Condylar(x) and not Conjoint(x) -> not Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Freelance(x) and not Achromous(x) -> Ostensible(x))\n\nnot Demeaning(iggie)\n\nOstensible(iggie) and forall x (Ostensible(x) -> Condylar(x)) -> therefore Condylar(iggie) Condylar(iggie) and forall x (Condylar(x) -> not Demeaning(x)) -> therefore not Demeaning(iggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Viviana is terminable. Annalisa is bigeneric. Roberto is not strep. Marcio is not bigeneric. Big things are handled. All tasmanian things are handled. If something is terminable then it is bigeneric. If something is bigeneric then it is not woolen. If something is bigeneric and not holey then it is not terminable. If something is handled and not strep then it is terminable. Viviana is woolen.", "logic": "\nTerminable(viviana)\nBigeneric(annalisa)\nnot Strep(roberto)\nnot Bigeneric(marcio)\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Handled(x))\nforall x (Tasmanian(x) -> Handled(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> not Woolen(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and not Holey(x) -> not Terminable(x))\nforall x (Handled(x) and not Strep(x) -> Terminable(x))\n\nWoolen(viviana)\n\nTerminable(viviana) and forall x (Terminable(x) -> Bigeneric(x)) -> therefore Bigeneric(viviana) Bigeneric(viviana) and forall x (Bigeneric(x) -> not Woolen(x)) -> therefore not Woolen(viviana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Bertina is trustful. Mariellen is salt. Tansy is not metallic. Susan is not salt. Big things are volute. All rancid things are volute. If something is trustful then it is salt. If something is salt then it is not jetting. If something is salt and not jacobean then it is not trustful. If something is volute and not metallic then it is trustful. Tansy is not trustful.", "logic": "\nTrustful(bertina)\nSalt(mariellen)\nnot Metallic(tansy)\nnot Salt(susan)\nforall x (Metallic(x) -> Volute(x))\nforall x (Rancid(x) -> Volute(x))\nforall x (Trustful(x) -> Salt(x))\nforall x (Salt(x) -> not Jetting(x))\nforall x (Salt(x) and not Jacobean(x) -> not Trustful(x))\nforall x (Volute(x) and not Metallic(x) -> Trustful(x))\n\nnot Trustful(tansy)\n\nforall x (Volute(x) and not Metallic(x) -> Trustful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Carolin is xxxi. Boyd is athenian. Olimpia is not jocose. Lorrayne is not athenian. Big things are asynergic. All crimson things are asynergic. If something is xxxi then it is athenian. If something is athenian then it is not meddling. If something is athenian and not seminal then it is not xxxi. If something is asynergic and not jocose then it is xxxi. Carolin is asynergic.", "logic": "\nXxxi(carolin)\nAthenian(boyd)\nnot Jocose(olimpia)\nnot Athenian(lorrayne)\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Asynergic(x))\nforall x (Crimson(x) -> Asynergic(x))\nforall x (Xxxi(x) -> Athenian(x))\nforall x (Athenian(x) -> not Meddling(x))\nforall x (Athenian(x) and not Seminal(x) -> not Xxxi(x))\nforall x (Asynergic(x) and not Jocose(x) -> Xxxi(x))\n\nAsynergic(carolin)\n\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Asynergic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Karylin is immense. Nelson is corsican. Jacinta is not leakproof. Mireielle is not corsican. Big things are tapered. All unmoved things are tapered. If something is immense then it is corsican. If something is corsican then it is not available. If something is corsican and not leftish then it is not immense. If something is tapered and not leakproof then it is immense. Mireielle is not tapered.", "logic": "\nImmense(karylin)\nCorsican(nelson)\nnot Leakproof(jacinta)\nnot Corsican(mireielle)\nforall x (Leakproof(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Unmoved(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Corsican(x))\nforall x (Corsican(x) -> not Available(x))\nforall x (Corsican(x) and not Leftish(x) -> not Immense(x))\nforall x (Tapered(x) and not Leakproof(x) -> Immense(x))\n\nnot Tapered(mireielle)\n\nforall x (Leakproof(x) -> Tapered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Alister is spurting. Debee is startling. Charlott is not actionable. Desiri is not startling. Big things are changeless. All intricate things are changeless. If something is spurting then it is startling. If something is startling then it is not lusty. If something is startling and not mythical then it is not spurting. If something is changeless and not actionable then it is spurting. Alister is mythical.", "logic": "\nSpurting(alister)\nStartling(debee)\nnot Actionable(charlott)\nnot Startling(desiri)\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Changeless(x))\nforall x (Intricate(x) -> Changeless(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Startling(x))\nforall x (Startling(x) -> not Lusty(x))\nforall x (Startling(x) and not Mythical(x) -> not Spurting(x))\nforall x (Changeless(x) and not Actionable(x) -> Spurting(x))\n\nMythical(alister)\n\nMythical(alister) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Glad is oafish. Harv is autocratic. Leda is not parve. Rakel is not autocratic. Big things are beady. All unswept things are beady. If something is oafish then it is autocratic. If something is autocratic then it is not desiccate. If something is autocratic and not uncurled then it is not oafish. If something is beady and not parve then it is oafish. Rakel is not parve.", "logic": "\nOafish(glad)\nAutocratic(harv)\nnot Parve(leda)\nnot Autocratic(rakel)\nforall x (Parve(x) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Unswept(x) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Oafish(x) -> Autocratic(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> not Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) and not Uncurled(x) -> not Oafish(x))\nforall x (Beady(x) and not Parve(x) -> Oafish(x))\n\nnot Parve(rakel)\n\nnot Parve(rakel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Kraig is carthusian. Terrie is cathectic. Dorice is not gummed. Olivette is not cathectic. Big things are foldaway. All beggarly things are foldaway. If something is carthusian then it is cathectic. If something is cathectic then it is not pliant. If something is cathectic and not overweight then it is not carthusian. If something is foldaway and not gummed then it is carthusian. Kraig is beggarly.", "logic": "\nCarthusian(kraig)\nCathectic(terrie)\nnot Gummed(dorice)\nnot Cathectic(olivette)\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Carthusian(x) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) -> not Pliant(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) and not Overweight(x) -> not Carthusian(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) and not Gummed(x) -> Carthusian(x))\n\nBeggarly(kraig)\n\nBeggarly(kraig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-239"} {"premises": "Rosemary is lordless. All coltish things are cowled. If something is lordless then it is coltish. Rosemary is lordless.", "logic": "\nLordless(rosemary)\nforall x (Coltish(x) -> Cowled(x))\nforall x (Lordless(x) -> Coltish(x))\n\nLordless(rosemary)\n\ntherefore Lordless(rosemary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Consuelo is refulgent. All sarawakian things are brisant. If something is refulgent then it is sarawakian. Consuelo is not refulgent.", "logic": "\nRefulgent(consuelo)\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Brisant(x))\nforall x (Refulgent(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\n\nnot Refulgent(consuelo)\n\ntherefore Refulgent(consuelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Mead is juristic. All debonnaire things are smaller. If something is juristic then it is debonnaire. Mead is debonnaire.", "logic": "\nJuristic(mead)\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) -> Smaller(x))\nforall x (Juristic(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\n\nDebonnaire(mead)\n\nJuristic(mead) and forall x (Juristic(x) -> Debonnaire(x)) -> therefore Debonnaire(mead)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Johnette is unexplored. All twilight things are deboned. If something is unexplored then it is twilight. Johnette is not twilight.", "logic": "\nUnexplored(johnette)\nforall x (Twilight(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Twilight(x))\n\nnot Twilight(johnette)\n\nUnexplored(johnette) and forall x (Unexplored(x) -> Twilight(x)) -> therefore Twilight(johnette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Alonso is unsmooth. All tailored things are choice. If something is unsmooth then it is tailored. Alonso is choice.", "logic": "\nUnsmooth(alonso)\nforall x (Tailored(x) -> Choice(x))\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Tailored(x))\n\nChoice(alonso)\n\nUnsmooth(alonso) and forall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Tailored(x)) -> therefore Tailored(alonso) Tailored(alonso) and forall x (Tailored(x) -> Choice(x)) -> therefore Choice(alonso)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Renaldo is lucrative. All slaphappy things are glamorous. If something is lucrative then it is slaphappy. Renaldo is not glamorous.", "logic": "\nLucrative(renaldo)\nforall x (Slaphappy(x) -> Glamorous(x))\nforall x (Lucrative(x) -> Slaphappy(x))\n\nnot Glamorous(renaldo)\n\nLucrative(renaldo) and forall x (Lucrative(x) -> Slaphappy(x)) -> therefore Slaphappy(renaldo) Slaphappy(renaldo) and forall x (Slaphappy(x) -> Glamorous(x)) -> therefore Glamorous(renaldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Neille is soft. All skinnerian things are asquint. If something is soft then it is skinnerian. Neille is not big.", "logic": "\nSoft(neille)\nforall x (Skinnerian(x) -> Asquint(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Skinnerian(x))\n\nnot Big(neille)\n\nnot Big(neille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Christin is minuscular. All immotile things are cataphatic. If something is minuscular then it is immotile. Christin is round.", "logic": "\nMinuscular(christin)\nforall x (Immotile(x) -> Cataphatic(x))\nforall x (Minuscular(x) -> Immotile(x))\n\nRound(christin)\n\nRound(christin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Forbes is forceful. All dendroidal things are phenotypic. If something is forceful then it is dendroidal. Forbes is not red.", "logic": "\nForceful(forbes)\nforall x (Dendroidal(x) -> Phenotypic(x))\nforall x (Forceful(x) -> Dendroidal(x))\n\nnot Red(forbes)\n\nnot Red(forbes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Durand is sworn. All riddled things are sublunar. If something is sworn then it is riddled. Durand is nice.", "logic": "\nSworn(durand)\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Sworn(x) -> Riddled(x))\n\nNice(durand)\n\nNice(durand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1337"} {"premises": "Greer is xxxiii. Greer is not roofed. Greer is not acold. Greer is model. Karina is xxxiii. Karina is model. Karina is unitarian. Yettie is xxxiii. Yettie is glowering. Yettie is roofed. Yettie is acold. Yettie is balky. Yettie is model. Tulley is glowering. Tulley is roofed. Tulley is unitarian. If Tulley is xxxiii then Tulley is roofed. If Tulley is unitarian then Tulley is balky. If something is balky then it is xxxiii. Yettie is model.", "logic": "\nXxxiii(greer)\nnot Roofed(greer)\nnot Acold(greer)\nModel(greer)\nXxxiii(karina)\nModel(karina)\nUnitarian(karina)\nXxxiii(yettie)\nGlowering(yettie)\nRoofed(yettie)\nAcold(yettie)\nBalky(yettie)\nModel(yettie)\nGlowering(tulley)\nRoofed(tulley)\nUnitarian(tulley)\nXxxiii(tulley) -> Roofed(tulley)\nUnitarian(tulley) -> Balky(tulley)\nforall x (Balky(x) -> Xxxiii(x))\n\nModel(yettie)\n\ntherefore Model(yettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Prasad is ribbony. Prasad is not conceptual. Prasad is not ateleiotic. Prasad is disgustful. Rafaela is ribbony. Rafaela is disgustful. Rafaela is vegetive. Bing is ribbony. Bing is wintery. Bing is conceptual. Bing is ateleiotic. Bing is speaking. Bing is disgustful. Janice is wintery. Janice is conceptual. Janice is vegetive. If Janice is ribbony then Janice is conceptual. If Janice is vegetive then Janice is speaking. If something is speaking then it is ribbony. Bing is not speaking.", "logic": "\nRibbony(prasad)\nnot Conceptual(prasad)\nnot Ateleiotic(prasad)\nDisgustful(prasad)\nRibbony(rafaela)\nDisgustful(rafaela)\nVegetive(rafaela)\nRibbony(bing)\nWintery(bing)\nConceptual(bing)\nAteleiotic(bing)\nSpeaking(bing)\nDisgustful(bing)\nWintery(janice)\nConceptual(janice)\nVegetive(janice)\nRibbony(janice) -> Conceptual(janice)\nVegetive(janice) -> Speaking(janice)\nforall x (Speaking(x) -> Ribbony(x))\n\nnot Speaking(bing)\n\ntherefore Speaking(bing)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Jaclyn is isoclinic. Jaclyn is not episodic. Jaclyn is not insouciant. Jaclyn is unyielding. Joscelin is isoclinic. Joscelin is unyielding. Joscelin is balding. Tobit is isoclinic. Tobit is galled. Tobit is episodic. Tobit is insouciant. Tobit is foremost. Tobit is unyielding. Riane is galled. Riane is episodic. Riane is balding. If Riane is isoclinic then Riane is episodic. If Riane is balding then Riane is foremost. If something is foremost then it is isoclinic. Riane is foremost.", "logic": "\nIsoclinic(jaclyn)\nnot Episodic(jaclyn)\nnot Insouciant(jaclyn)\nUnyielding(jaclyn)\nIsoclinic(joscelin)\nUnyielding(joscelin)\nBalding(joscelin)\nIsoclinic(tobit)\nGalled(tobit)\nEpisodic(tobit)\nInsouciant(tobit)\nForemost(tobit)\nUnyielding(tobit)\nGalled(riane)\nEpisodic(riane)\nBalding(riane)\nIsoclinic(riane) -> Episodic(riane)\nBalding(riane) -> Foremost(riane)\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\n\nForemost(riane)\n\nBalding(riane) and Balding(riane) -> Foremost(riane) -> therefore Foremost(riane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Del is stormy. Del is not propellant. Del is not reserved. Del is wheezing. Alastair is stormy. Alastair is wheezing. Alastair is antitrust. Jotham is stormy. Jotham is unfattened. Jotham is propellant. Jotham is reserved. Jotham is rapid. Jotham is wheezing. Carine is unfattened. Carine is propellant. Carine is antitrust. If Carine is stormy then Carine is propellant. If Carine is antitrust then Carine is rapid. If something is rapid then it is stormy. Carine is not rapid.", "logic": "\nStormy(del)\nnot Propellant(del)\nnot Reserved(del)\nWheezing(del)\nStormy(alastair)\nWheezing(alastair)\nAntitrust(alastair)\nStormy(jotham)\nUnfattened(jotham)\nPropellant(jotham)\nReserved(jotham)\nRapid(jotham)\nWheezing(jotham)\nUnfattened(carine)\nPropellant(carine)\nAntitrust(carine)\nStormy(carine) -> Propellant(carine)\nAntitrust(carine) -> Rapid(carine)\nforall x (Rapid(x) -> Stormy(x))\n\nnot Rapid(carine)\n\nAntitrust(carine) and Antitrust(carine) -> Rapid(carine) -> therefore Rapid(carine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Clari is palatal. Clari is not blistering. Clari is not benthal. Clari is essential. Lindsay is palatal. Lindsay is essential. Lindsay is electrical. Elaine is palatal. Elaine is moony. Elaine is blistering. Elaine is benthal. Elaine is stringent. Elaine is essential. Trace is moony. Trace is blistering. Trace is electrical. If Trace is palatal then Trace is blistering. If Trace is electrical then Trace is stringent. If something is stringent then it is palatal. Trace is palatal.", "logic": "\nPalatal(clari)\nnot Blistering(clari)\nnot Benthal(clari)\nEssential(clari)\nPalatal(lindsay)\nEssential(lindsay)\nElectrical(lindsay)\nPalatal(elaine)\nMoony(elaine)\nBlistering(elaine)\nBenthal(elaine)\nStringent(elaine)\nEssential(elaine)\nMoony(trace)\nBlistering(trace)\nElectrical(trace)\nPalatal(trace) -> Blistering(trace)\nElectrical(trace) -> Stringent(trace)\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Palatal(x))\n\nPalatal(trace)\n\nElectrical(trace) and Electrical(trace) -> Stringent(trace) -> therefore Stringent(trace) Stringent(trace) and forall x (Stringent(x) -> Palatal(x)) -> therefore Palatal(trace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Meagan is pentagonal. Meagan is not outlaw. Meagan is not submissive. Meagan is nescient. Dusty is pentagonal. Dusty is nescient. Dusty is hadean. Karel is pentagonal. Karel is scorching. Karel is outlaw. Karel is submissive. Karel is soldierly. Karel is nescient. Salomone is scorching. Salomone is outlaw. Salomone is hadean. If Salomone is pentagonal then Salomone is outlaw. If Salomone is hadean then Salomone is soldierly. If something is soldierly then it is pentagonal. Salomone is not pentagonal.", "logic": "\nPentagonal(meagan)\nnot Outlaw(meagan)\nnot Submissive(meagan)\nNescient(meagan)\nPentagonal(dusty)\nNescient(dusty)\nHadean(dusty)\nPentagonal(karel)\nScorching(karel)\nOutlaw(karel)\nSubmissive(karel)\nSoldierly(karel)\nNescient(karel)\nScorching(salomone)\nOutlaw(salomone)\nHadean(salomone)\nPentagonal(salomone) -> Outlaw(salomone)\nHadean(salomone) -> Soldierly(salomone)\nforall x (Soldierly(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\n\nnot Pentagonal(salomone)\n\nHadean(salomone) and Hadean(salomone) -> Soldierly(salomone) -> therefore Soldierly(salomone) Soldierly(salomone) and forall x (Soldierly(x) -> Pentagonal(x)) -> therefore Pentagonal(salomone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Farrah is unexcused. Farrah is not unpompous. Farrah is not strict. Farrah is epidemic. Ulric is unexcused. Ulric is epidemic. Ulric is clad. Cherey is unexcused. Cherey is macro. Cherey is unpompous. Cherey is strict. Cherey is parental. Cherey is epidemic. Christan is macro. Christan is unpompous. Christan is clad. If Christan is unexcused then Christan is unpompous. If Christan is clad then Christan is parental. If something is parental then it is unexcused. Ulric is not unpompous.", "logic": "\nUnexcused(farrah)\nnot Unpompous(farrah)\nnot Strict(farrah)\nEpidemic(farrah)\nUnexcused(ulric)\nEpidemic(ulric)\nClad(ulric)\nUnexcused(cherey)\nMacro(cherey)\nUnpompous(cherey)\nStrict(cherey)\nParental(cherey)\nEpidemic(cherey)\nMacro(christan)\nUnpompous(christan)\nClad(christan)\nUnexcused(christan) -> Unpompous(christan)\nClad(christan) -> Parental(christan)\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Unexcused(x))\n\nnot Unpompous(ulric)\n\nnot Unpompous(ulric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Kiersten is offshore. Kiersten is not kampuchean. Kiersten is not wooded. Kiersten is overarm. Elly is offshore. Elly is overarm. Elly is garmented. Lay is offshore. Lay is gilded. Lay is kampuchean. Lay is wooded. Lay is exceeding. Lay is overarm. Fortune is gilded. Fortune is kampuchean. Fortune is garmented. If Fortune is offshore then Fortune is kampuchean. If Fortune is garmented then Fortune is exceeding. If something is exceeding then it is offshore. Kiersten is exceeding.", "logic": "\nOffshore(kiersten)\nnot Kampuchean(kiersten)\nnot Wooded(kiersten)\nOverarm(kiersten)\nOffshore(elly)\nOverarm(elly)\nGarmented(elly)\nOffshore(lay)\nGilded(lay)\nKampuchean(lay)\nWooded(lay)\nExceeding(lay)\nOverarm(lay)\nGilded(fortune)\nKampuchean(fortune)\nGarmented(fortune)\nOffshore(fortune) -> Kampuchean(fortune)\nGarmented(fortune) -> Exceeding(fortune)\nforall x (Exceeding(x) -> Offshore(x))\n\nExceeding(kiersten)\n\nExceeding(kiersten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Ward is cellulosid. Ward is not derogatory. Ward is not humified. Ward is inept. Odelle is cellulosid. Odelle is inept. Odelle is pictural. Matelda is cellulosid. Matelda is ladened. Matelda is derogatory. Matelda is humified. Matelda is fourhanded. Matelda is inept. Binky is ladened. Binky is derogatory. Binky is pictural. If Binky is cellulosid then Binky is derogatory. If Binky is pictural then Binky is fourhanded. If something is fourhanded then it is cellulosid. Odelle is not humified.", "logic": "\nCellulosid(ward)\nnot Derogatory(ward)\nnot Humified(ward)\nInept(ward)\nCellulosid(odelle)\nInept(odelle)\nPictural(odelle)\nCellulosid(matelda)\nLadened(matelda)\nDerogatory(matelda)\nHumified(matelda)\nFourhanded(matelda)\nInept(matelda)\nLadened(binky)\nDerogatory(binky)\nPictural(binky)\nCellulosid(binky) -> Derogatory(binky)\nPictural(binky) -> Fourhanded(binky)\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) -> Cellulosid(x))\n\nnot Humified(odelle)\n\nnot Humified(odelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Sibylla is akin. Sibylla is not moveable. Sibylla is not roughdried. Sibylla is surmisable. Anselm is akin. Anselm is surmisable. Anselm is mayoral. Tessi is akin. Tessi is untrusty. Tessi is moveable. Tessi is roughdried. Tessi is commensal. Tessi is surmisable. Forester is untrusty. Forester is moveable. Forester is mayoral. If Forester is akin then Forester is moveable. If Forester is mayoral then Forester is commensal. If something is commensal then it is akin. Forester is surmisable.", "logic": "\nAkin(sibylla)\nnot Moveable(sibylla)\nnot Roughdried(sibylla)\nSurmisable(sibylla)\nAkin(anselm)\nSurmisable(anselm)\nMayoral(anselm)\nAkin(tessi)\nUntrusty(tessi)\nMoveable(tessi)\nRoughdried(tessi)\nCommensal(tessi)\nSurmisable(tessi)\nUntrusty(forester)\nMoveable(forester)\nMayoral(forester)\nAkin(forester) -> Moveable(forester)\nMayoral(forester) -> Commensal(forester)\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Akin(x))\n\nSurmisable(forester)\n\nSurmisable(forester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Chandler is ductile. Chandler is not african. Chandler is not geniculate. Chandler is downright. Roarke is ductile. Roarke is downright. Roarke is confining. Eimile is ductile. Eimile is unsinkable. Eimile is african. Eimile is geniculate. Eimile is maroon. Eimile is downright. Francyne is unsinkable. Francyne is african. Francyne is confining. If Francyne is ductile then Francyne is african. If Francyne is confining then Francyne is maroon. If something is maroon then it is ductile. Roarke is not unsinkable.", "logic": "\nDuctile(chandler)\nnot African(chandler)\nnot Geniculate(chandler)\nDownright(chandler)\nDuctile(roarke)\nDownright(roarke)\nConfining(roarke)\nDuctile(eimile)\nUnsinkable(eimile)\nAfrican(eimile)\nGeniculate(eimile)\nMaroon(eimile)\nDownright(eimile)\nUnsinkable(francyne)\nAfrican(francyne)\nConfining(francyne)\nDuctile(francyne) -> African(francyne)\nConfining(francyne) -> Maroon(francyne)\nforall x (Maroon(x) -> Ductile(x))\n\nnot Unsinkable(roarke)\n\nnot Unsinkable(roarke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "Betteann is some. Betteann is not parabolic. Betteann is not procedural. Betteann is lengthways. Davis is some. Davis is lengthways. Davis is regenerate. Ardyth is some. Ardyth is truthful. Ardyth is parabolic. Ardyth is procedural. Ardyth is sensible. Ardyth is lengthways. Joleen is truthful. Joleen is parabolic. Joleen is regenerate. If Joleen is some then Joleen is parabolic. If Joleen is regenerate then Joleen is sensible. If something is sensible then it is some. Ardyth is regenerate.", "logic": "\nSome(betteann)\nnot Parabolic(betteann)\nnot Procedural(betteann)\nLengthways(betteann)\nSome(davis)\nLengthways(davis)\nRegenerate(davis)\nSome(ardyth)\nTruthful(ardyth)\nParabolic(ardyth)\nProcedural(ardyth)\nSensible(ardyth)\nLengthways(ardyth)\nTruthful(joleen)\nParabolic(joleen)\nRegenerate(joleen)\nSome(joleen) -> Parabolic(joleen)\nRegenerate(joleen) -> Sensible(joleen)\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> Some(x))\n\nRegenerate(ardyth)\n\nRegenerate(ardyth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1182"} {"premises": "The damaris is haploid. The kat deaf the damaris. The kat is haploid. The gretal resume the damaris. The gretal deaf the damaris. The gretal deaf the donna. The gretal is nipponese. The gretal is grumous. The gretal nick the kat. The donna resume the gretal. The donna is nipponese. The donna is unstable. If the kat deaf the damaris then the damaris resume the donna. If someone resume the donna then the donna nick the gretal. The gretal deaf the damaris.", "logic": "\nHaploid(damaris)\nDeaf(kat, damaris)\nHaploid(kat)\nResume(gretal, damaris)\nDeaf(gretal, damaris)\nDeaf(gretal, donna)\nNipponese(gretal)\nGrumous(gretal)\nNick(gretal, kat)\nResume(donna, gretal)\nNipponese(donna)\nUnstable(donna)\nDeaf(kat, damaris) -> Resume(damaris, donna)\nforall x (Resume(x, donna) -> Nick(donna, gretal))\n\nDeaf(gretal, damaris)\n\ntherefore Deaf(gretal, damaris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The hezekiah is nonleaded. The netty clump the hezekiah. The netty is nonleaded. The pat resew the hezekiah. The pat clump the hezekiah. The pat clump the debbie. The pat is fatuous. The pat is kampuchean. The pat traverse the netty. The debbie resew the pat. The debbie is fatuous. The debbie is unpompous. If the netty clump the hezekiah then the hezekiah resew the debbie. If someone resew the debbie then the debbie traverse the pat. The debbie is not unpompous.", "logic": "\nNonleaded(hezekiah)\nClump(netty, hezekiah)\nNonleaded(netty)\nResew(pat, hezekiah)\nClump(pat, hezekiah)\nClump(pat, debbie)\nFatuous(pat)\nKampuchean(pat)\nTraverse(pat, netty)\nResew(debbie, pat)\nFatuous(debbie)\nUnpompous(debbie)\nClump(netty, hezekiah) -> Resew(hezekiah, debbie)\nforall x (Resew(x, debbie) -> Traverse(debbie, pat))\n\nnot Unpompous(debbie)\n\ntherefore Unpompous(debbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The abagail is homocyclic. The erminie even the abagail. The erminie is homocyclic. The allah tend the abagail. The allah even the abagail. The allah even the marjie. The allah is gothic. The allah is focal. The allah swage the erminie. The marjie tend the allah. The marjie is gothic. The marjie is flaxen. If the erminie even the abagail then the abagail tend the marjie. If someone tend the marjie then the marjie swage the allah. The abagail tend the marjie.", "logic": "\nHomocyclic(abagail)\nEven(erminie, abagail)\nHomocyclic(erminie)\nTend(allah, abagail)\nEven(allah, abagail)\nEven(allah, marjie)\nGothic(allah)\nFocal(allah)\nSwage(allah, erminie)\nTend(marjie, allah)\nGothic(marjie)\nFlaxen(marjie)\nEven(erminie, abagail) -> Tend(abagail, marjie)\nforall x (Tend(x, marjie) -> Swage(marjie, allah))\n\nTend(abagail, marjie)\n\nEven(erminie, abagail) and Even(erminie, abagail) -> Tend(abagail, marjie) -> therefore Tend(abagail, marjie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The linnell is unbeholden. The sydel ankylose the linnell. The sydel is unbeholden. The ammamaria gormandise the linnell. The ammamaria ankylose the linnell. The ammamaria ankylose the ophelie. The ammamaria is amative. The ammamaria is effortful. The ammamaria whirr the sydel. The ophelie gormandise the ammamaria. The ophelie is amative. The ophelie is accoutred. If the sydel ankylose the linnell then the linnell gormandise the ophelie. If someone gormandise the ophelie then the ophelie whirr the ammamaria. The linnell does not chase the ophelie.", "logic": "\nUnbeholden(linnell)\nAnkylose(sydel, linnell)\nUnbeholden(sydel)\nGormandise(ammamaria, linnell)\nAnkylose(ammamaria, linnell)\nAnkylose(ammamaria, ophelie)\nAmative(ammamaria)\nEffortful(ammamaria)\nWhirr(ammamaria, sydel)\nGormandise(ophelie, ammamaria)\nAmative(ophelie)\nAccoutred(ophelie)\nAnkylose(sydel, linnell) -> Gormandise(linnell, ophelie)\nforall x (Gormandise(x, ophelie) -> Whirr(ophelie, ammamaria))\n\nnot Gormandise(linnell, ophelie)\n\nAnkylose(sydel, linnell) and Ankylose(sydel, linnell) -> Gormandise(linnell, ophelie) -> therefore Gormandise(linnell, ophelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The corilla is tied. The raynell bilk the corilla. The raynell is tied. The rudolf behoove the corilla. The rudolf bilk the corilla. The rudolf bilk the nita. The rudolf is attachable. The rudolf is leaflike. The rudolf decrypt the raynell. The nita behoove the rudolf. The nita is attachable. The nita is catchpenny. If the raynell bilk the corilla then the corilla behoove the nita. If someone behoove the nita then the nita decrypt the rudolf. The nita decrypt the rudolf.", "logic": "\nTied(corilla)\nBilk(raynell, corilla)\nTied(raynell)\nBehoove(rudolf, corilla)\nBilk(rudolf, corilla)\nBilk(rudolf, nita)\nAttachable(rudolf)\nLeaflike(rudolf)\nDecrypt(rudolf, raynell)\nBehoove(nita, rudolf)\nAttachable(nita)\nCatchpenny(nita)\nBilk(raynell, corilla) -> Behoove(corilla, nita)\nforall x (Behoove(x, nita) -> Decrypt(nita, rudolf))\n\nDecrypt(nita, rudolf)\n\nBilk(raynell, corilla) and Bilk(raynell, corilla) -> Behoove(corilla, nita) -> therefore Behoove(corilla, nita) Behoove(corilla, nita) and forall x (Behoove(x, nita) -> Decrypt(nita, rudolf)) -> therefore Decrypt(nita, rudolf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The pierre is bigeneric. The augusto tootle the pierre. The augusto is bigeneric. The madella enchain the pierre. The madella tootle the pierre. The madella tootle the edythe. The madella is cuban. The madella is deep. The madella cosh the augusto. The edythe enchain the madella. The edythe is cuban. The edythe is ransomed. If the augusto tootle the pierre then the pierre enchain the edythe. If someone enchain the edythe then the edythe cosh the madella. The edythe does not need the madella.", "logic": "\nBigeneric(pierre)\nTootle(augusto, pierre)\nBigeneric(augusto)\nEnchain(madella, pierre)\nTootle(madella, pierre)\nTootle(madella, edythe)\nCuban(madella)\nDeep(madella)\nCosh(madella, augusto)\nEnchain(edythe, madella)\nCuban(edythe)\nRansomed(edythe)\nTootle(augusto, pierre) -> Enchain(pierre, edythe)\nforall x (Enchain(x, edythe) -> Cosh(edythe, madella))\n\nnot Cosh(edythe, madella)\n\nTootle(augusto, pierre) and Tootle(augusto, pierre) -> Enchain(pierre, edythe) -> therefore Enchain(pierre, edythe) Enchain(pierre, edythe) and forall x (Enchain(x, edythe) -> Cosh(edythe, madella)) -> therefore Cosh(edythe, madella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The veronica is fucking. The butler kiss the veronica. The butler is fucking. The kelcey purr the veronica. The kelcey kiss the veronica. The kelcey kiss the herrmann. The kelcey is perversive. The kelcey is potential. The kelcey archaize the butler. The herrmann purr the kelcey. The herrmann is perversive. The herrmann is subsidised. If the butler kiss the veronica then the veronica purr the herrmann. If someone purr the herrmann then the herrmann archaize the kelcey. The butler is not potential.", "logic": "\nFucking(veronica)\nKiss(butler, veronica)\nFucking(butler)\nPurr(kelcey, veronica)\nKiss(kelcey, veronica)\nKiss(kelcey, herrmann)\nPerversive(kelcey)\nPotential(kelcey)\nArchaize(kelcey, butler)\nPurr(herrmann, kelcey)\nPerversive(herrmann)\nSubsidised(herrmann)\nKiss(butler, veronica) -> Purr(veronica, herrmann)\nforall x (Purr(x, herrmann) -> Archaize(herrmann, kelcey))\n\nnot Potential(butler)\n\nnot Potential(butler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The lorri is unclouded. The shilpa exact the lorri. The shilpa is unclouded. The armstrong crash the lorri. The armstrong exact the lorri. The armstrong exact the rosabelle. The armstrong is watertight. The armstrong is bottomed. The armstrong leapfrog the shilpa. The rosabelle crash the armstrong. The rosabelle is watertight. The rosabelle is voiced. If the shilpa exact the lorri then the lorri crash the rosabelle. If someone crash the rosabelle then the rosabelle leapfrog the armstrong. The rosabelle is rough.", "logic": "\nUnclouded(lorri)\nExact(shilpa, lorri)\nUnclouded(shilpa)\nCrash(armstrong, lorri)\nExact(armstrong, lorri)\nExact(armstrong, rosabelle)\nWatertight(armstrong)\nBottomed(armstrong)\nLeapfrog(armstrong, shilpa)\nCrash(rosabelle, armstrong)\nWatertight(rosabelle)\nVoiced(rosabelle)\nExact(shilpa, lorri) -> Crash(lorri, rosabelle)\nforall x (Crash(x, rosabelle) -> Leapfrog(rosabelle, armstrong))\n\nRough(rosabelle)\n\nRough(rosabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The merrielle is pasty. The elsie symmetrize the merrielle. The elsie is pasty. The rudiger interlude the merrielle. The rudiger symmetrize the merrielle. The rudiger symmetrize the janela. The rudiger is bodyless. The rudiger is famed. The rudiger blight the elsie. The janela interlude the rudiger. The janela is bodyless. The janela is carious. If the elsie symmetrize the merrielle then the merrielle interlude the janela. If someone interlude the janela then the janela blight the rudiger. The janela does not chase the elsie.", "logic": "\nPasty(merrielle)\nSymmetrize(elsie, merrielle)\nPasty(elsie)\nInterlude(rudiger, merrielle)\nSymmetrize(rudiger, merrielle)\nSymmetrize(rudiger, janela)\nBodyless(rudiger)\nFamed(rudiger)\nBlight(rudiger, elsie)\nInterlude(janela, rudiger)\nBodyless(janela)\nCarious(janela)\nSymmetrize(elsie, merrielle) -> Interlude(merrielle, janela)\nforall x (Interlude(x, janela) -> Blight(janela, rudiger))\n\nnot Interlude(janela, elsie)\n\nnot Interlude(janela, elsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The jilleen is lxxxiv. The palmer sleuth the jilleen. The palmer is lxxxiv. The sturgis reassemble the jilleen. The sturgis sleuth the jilleen. The sturgis sleuth the missy. The sturgis is vulcanised. The sturgis is maximal. The sturgis foredate the palmer. The missy reassemble the sturgis. The missy is vulcanised. The missy is retiring. If the palmer sleuth the jilleen then the jilleen reassemble the missy. If someone reassemble the missy then the missy foredate the sturgis. The palmer foredate the jilleen.", "logic": "\nLxxxiv(jilleen)\nSleuth(palmer, jilleen)\nLxxxiv(palmer)\nReassemble(sturgis, jilleen)\nSleuth(sturgis, jilleen)\nSleuth(sturgis, missy)\nVulcanised(sturgis)\nMaximal(sturgis)\nForedate(sturgis, palmer)\nReassemble(missy, sturgis)\nVulcanised(missy)\nRetiring(missy)\nSleuth(palmer, jilleen) -> Reassemble(jilleen, missy)\nforall x (Reassemble(x, missy) -> Foredate(missy, sturgis))\n\nForedate(palmer, jilleen)\n\nForedate(palmer, jilleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The pierson is blebbed. The spiros barbarize the pierson. The spiros is blebbed. The harmony bedew the pierson. The harmony barbarize the pierson. The harmony barbarize the nichols. The harmony is branded. The harmony is blissful. The harmony cuff the spiros. The nichols bedew the harmony. The nichols is branded. The nichols is ingrowing. If the spiros barbarize the pierson then the pierson bedew the nichols. If someone bedew the nichols then the nichols cuff the harmony. The harmony is not ingrowing.", "logic": "\nBlebbed(pierson)\nBarbarize(spiros, pierson)\nBlebbed(spiros)\nBedew(harmony, pierson)\nBarbarize(harmony, pierson)\nBarbarize(harmony, nichols)\nBranded(harmony)\nBlissful(harmony)\nCuff(harmony, spiros)\nBedew(nichols, harmony)\nBranded(nichols)\nIngrowing(nichols)\nBarbarize(spiros, pierson) -> Bedew(pierson, nichols)\nforall x (Bedew(x, nichols) -> Cuff(nichols, harmony))\n\nnot Ingrowing(harmony)\n\nnot Ingrowing(harmony) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "The carmen is meaty. The spiro deluge the carmen. The spiro is meaty. The shina disappoint the carmen. The shina deluge the carmen. The shina deluge the rudie. The shina is articled. The shina is residuary. The shina blazon the spiro. The rudie disappoint the shina. The rudie is articled. The rudie is clarion. If the spiro deluge the carmen then the carmen disappoint the rudie. If someone disappoint the rudie then the rudie blazon the shina. The rudie deluge the rudie.", "logic": "\nMeaty(carmen)\nDeluge(spiro, carmen)\nMeaty(spiro)\nDisappoint(shina, carmen)\nDeluge(shina, carmen)\nDeluge(shina, rudie)\nArticled(shina)\nResiduary(shina)\nBlazon(shina, spiro)\nDisappoint(rudie, shina)\nArticled(rudie)\nClarion(rudie)\nDeluge(spiro, carmen) -> Disappoint(carmen, rudie)\nforall x (Disappoint(x, rudie) -> Blazon(rudie, shina))\n\nDeluge(rudie, rudie)\n\nDeluge(rudie, rudie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-166"} {"premises": "Gelya is meagerly. Frannie is coalesced. Buck is trackable. If someone is rayless and adaptable then they are trackable. If someone is isothermal then they are coalesced. Green people are not coalesced. Quiet, synthetic people are rayless. All meagerly people are synthetic. If Frannie is isothermal then Frannie is rayless. Quiet people are isothermal. If someone is adaptable then they are meagerly. Buck is trackable.", "logic": "\nMeagerly(gelya)\nCoalesced(frannie)\nTrackable(buck)\nforall x (Rayless(x) and Adaptable(x) -> Trackable(x))\nforall x (Isothermal(x) -> Coalesced(x))\nforall x (Rayless(x) -> not Coalesced(x))\nforall x (Trackable(x) and Synthetic(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Meagerly(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nIsothermal(frannie) -> Rayless(frannie)\nforall x (Trackable(x) -> Isothermal(x))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Meagerly(x))\n\nTrackable(buck)\n\ntherefore Trackable(buck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Jessa is slim. Thebault is uninviting. Frederic is operant. If someone is beamy and subacid then they are operant. If someone is limacoid then they are uninviting. Green people are not uninviting. Quiet, trenchant people are beamy. All slim people are trenchant. If Thebault is limacoid then Thebault is beamy. Quiet people are limacoid. If someone is subacid then they are slim. Thebault is not uninviting.", "logic": "\nSlim(jessa)\nUninviting(thebault)\nOperant(frederic)\nforall x (Beamy(x) and Subacid(x) -> Operant(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) -> Uninviting(x))\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> not Uninviting(x))\nforall x (Operant(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Beamy(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Trenchant(x))\nLimacoid(thebault) -> Beamy(thebault)\nforall x (Operant(x) -> Limacoid(x))\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> Slim(x))\n\nnot Uninviting(thebault)\n\ntherefore Uninviting(thebault)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Odele is baffled. Brooke is confutable. Tome is squared. If someone is endoergic and paved then they are squared. If someone is rocklike then they are confutable. Green people are not confutable. Quiet, patient people are endoergic. All baffled people are patient. If Brooke is rocklike then Brooke is endoergic. Quiet people are rocklike. If someone is paved then they are baffled. Odele is patient.", "logic": "\nBaffled(odele)\nConfutable(brooke)\nSquared(tome)\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and Paved(x) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Rocklike(x) -> Confutable(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> not Confutable(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) and Patient(x) -> Endoergic(x))\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Patient(x))\nRocklike(brooke) -> Endoergic(brooke)\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Rocklike(x))\nforall x (Paved(x) -> Baffled(x))\n\nPatient(odele)\n\nBaffled(odele) and forall x (Baffled(x) -> Patient(x)) -> therefore Patient(odele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Jonny is unspotted. Dimitrou is praetorian. Kimmo is vapourific. If someone is animistic and aligned then they are vapourific. If someone is sold then they are praetorian. Green people are not praetorian. Quiet, adscript people are animistic. All unspotted people are adscript. If Dimitrou is sold then Dimitrou is animistic. Quiet people are sold. If someone is aligned then they are unspotted. Kimmo is not sold.", "logic": "\nUnspotted(jonny)\nPraetorian(dimitrou)\nVapourific(kimmo)\nforall x (Animistic(x) and Aligned(x) -> Vapourific(x))\nforall x (Sold(x) -> Praetorian(x))\nforall x (Animistic(x) -> not Praetorian(x))\nforall x (Vapourific(x) and Adscript(x) -> Animistic(x))\nforall x (Unspotted(x) -> Adscript(x))\nSold(dimitrou) -> Animistic(dimitrou)\nforall x (Vapourific(x) -> Sold(x))\nforall x (Aligned(x) -> Unspotted(x))\n\nnot Sold(kimmo)\n\nVapourific(kimmo) and forall x (Vapourific(x) -> Sold(x)) -> therefore Sold(kimmo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Fredia is acronymous. Ilene is quaternary. Salem is glaring. If someone is buckshee and onshore then they are glaring. If someone is editorial then they are quaternary. Green people are not quaternary. Quiet, recessive people are buckshee. All acronymous people are recessive. If Ilene is editorial then Ilene is buckshee. Quiet people are editorial. If someone is onshore then they are acronymous. Salem is quaternary.", "logic": "\nAcronymous(fredia)\nQuaternary(ilene)\nGlaring(salem)\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and Onshore(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Editorial(x) -> Quaternary(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> not Quaternary(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) and Recessive(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Recessive(x))\nEditorial(ilene) -> Buckshee(ilene)\nforall x (Glaring(x) -> Editorial(x))\nforall x (Onshore(x) -> Acronymous(x))\n\nQuaternary(salem)\n\nGlaring(salem) and forall x (Glaring(x) -> Editorial(x)) -> therefore Editorial(salem) Editorial(salem) and forall x (Editorial(x) -> Quaternary(x)) -> therefore Quaternary(salem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Tray is pouring. Judah is scalene. Marmaduke is pectic. If someone is amethyst and erroneous then they are pectic. If someone is maxi then they are scalene. Green people are not scalene. Quiet, languid people are amethyst. All pouring people are languid. If Judah is maxi then Judah is amethyst. Quiet people are maxi. If someone is erroneous then they are pouring. Marmaduke is not scalene.", "logic": "\nPouring(tray)\nScalene(judah)\nPectic(marmaduke)\nforall x (Amethyst(x) and Erroneous(x) -> Pectic(x))\nforall x (Maxi(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Amethyst(x) -> not Scalene(x))\nforall x (Pectic(x) and Languid(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nforall x (Pouring(x) -> Languid(x))\nMaxi(judah) -> Amethyst(judah)\nforall x (Pectic(x) -> Maxi(x))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) -> Pouring(x))\n\nnot Scalene(marmaduke)\n\nPectic(marmaduke) and forall x (Pectic(x) -> Maxi(x)) -> therefore Maxi(marmaduke) Maxi(marmaduke) and forall x (Maxi(x) -> Scalene(x)) -> therefore Scalene(marmaduke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Merla is smelly. Tyrus is alliaceous. Salome is aggregated. If someone is subaltern and keyed then they are aggregated. If someone is mawkish then they are alliaceous. Green people are not alliaceous. Quiet, monarchic people are subaltern. All smelly people are monarchic. If Tyrus is mawkish then Tyrus is subaltern. Quiet people are mawkish. If someone is keyed then they are smelly. Merla is not mawkish.", "logic": "\nSmelly(merla)\nAlliaceous(tyrus)\nAggregated(salome)\nforall x (Subaltern(x) and Keyed(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Alliaceous(x))\nforall x (Subaltern(x) -> not Alliaceous(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) and Monarchic(x) -> Subaltern(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Monarchic(x))\nMawkish(tyrus) -> Subaltern(tyrus)\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Smelly(x))\n\nnot Mawkish(merla)\n\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Mawkish(x)) <- forall x (Subaltern(x) and Keyed(x) -> Aggregated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Tam is untenable. Darwin is uncoloured. Butler is unroofed. If someone is trancelike and soundless then they are unroofed. If someone is lxxxvii then they are uncoloured. Green people are not uncoloured. Quiet, deathlike people are trancelike. All untenable people are deathlike. If Darwin is lxxxvii then Darwin is trancelike. Quiet people are lxxxvii. If someone is soundless then they are untenable. Darwin is lxxxvii.", "logic": "\nUntenable(tam)\nUncoloured(darwin)\nUnroofed(butler)\nforall x (Trancelike(x) and Soundless(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Lxxxvii(x) -> Uncoloured(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> not Uncoloured(x))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) and Deathlike(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nLxxxvii(darwin) -> Trancelike(darwin)\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Soundless(x) -> Untenable(x))\n\nLxxxvii(darwin)\n\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Lxxxvii(x)) <- forall x (Trancelike(x) and Soundless(x) -> Unroofed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Pepillo is refreshed. Hannah is chadian. Hermon is araneidal. If someone is epochal and unattached then they are araneidal. If someone is rakish then they are chadian. Green people are not chadian. Quiet, renegade people are epochal. All refreshed people are renegade. If Hannah is rakish then Hannah is epochal. Quiet people are rakish. If someone is unattached then they are refreshed. Hermon is not renegade.", "logic": "\nRefreshed(pepillo)\nChadian(hannah)\nAraneidal(hermon)\nforall x (Epochal(x) and Unattached(x) -> Araneidal(x))\nforall x (Rakish(x) -> Chadian(x))\nforall x (Epochal(x) -> not Chadian(x))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) and Renegade(x) -> Epochal(x))\nforall x (Refreshed(x) -> Renegade(x))\nRakish(hannah) -> Epochal(hannah)\nforall x (Araneidal(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) -> Refreshed(x))\n\nnot Renegade(hermon)\n\nforall x (Refreshed(x) -> Renegade(x)) <- forall x (Unattached(x) -> Refreshed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Antonin is whorled. Stanton is pussy. Sidoney is yellowed. If someone is rending and purple then they are yellowed. If someone is wobbly then they are pussy. Green people are not pussy. Quiet, pursuing people are rending. All whorled people are pursuing. If Stanton is wobbly then Stanton is rending. Quiet people are wobbly. If someone is purple then they are whorled. Stanton is purple.", "logic": "\nWhorled(antonin)\nPussy(stanton)\nYellowed(sidoney)\nforall x (Rending(x) and Purple(x) -> Yellowed(x))\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Pussy(x))\nforall x (Rending(x) -> not Pussy(x))\nforall x (Yellowed(x) and Pursuing(x) -> Rending(x))\nforall x (Whorled(x) -> Pursuing(x))\nWobbly(stanton) -> Rending(stanton)\nforall x (Yellowed(x) -> Wobbly(x))\nforall x (Purple(x) -> Whorled(x))\n\nPurple(stanton)\n\nPurple(stanton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Waleed is aminic. Dawn is amendable. Viole is iambic. If someone is carotid and sourish then they are iambic. If someone is fond then they are amendable. Green people are not amendable. Quiet, beakless people are carotid. All aminic people are beakless. If Dawn is fond then Dawn is carotid. Quiet people are fond. If someone is sourish then they are aminic. Viole is not sourish.", "logic": "\nAminic(waleed)\nAmendable(dawn)\nIambic(viole)\nforall x (Carotid(x) and Sourish(x) -> Iambic(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) -> Amendable(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> not Amendable(x))\nforall x (Iambic(x) and Beakless(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Aminic(x) -> Beakless(x))\nFond(dawn) -> Carotid(dawn)\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Fond(x))\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Aminic(x))\n\nnot Sourish(viole)\n\nnot Sourish(viole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Taddeo is latish. Shanie is innumerous. Korrie is stewed. If someone is capacious and auxiliary then they are stewed. If someone is thoracic then they are innumerous. Green people are not innumerous. Quiet, piggish people are capacious. All latish people are piggish. If Shanie is thoracic then Shanie is capacious. Quiet people are thoracic. If someone is auxiliary then they are latish. Taddeo is auxiliary.", "logic": "\nLatish(taddeo)\nInnumerous(shanie)\nStewed(korrie)\nforall x (Capacious(x) and Auxiliary(x) -> Stewed(x))\nforall x (Thoracic(x) -> Innumerous(x))\nforall x (Capacious(x) -> not Innumerous(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) and Piggish(x) -> Capacious(x))\nforall x (Latish(x) -> Piggish(x))\nThoracic(shanie) -> Capacious(shanie)\nforall x (Stewed(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Auxiliary(x) -> Latish(x))\n\nAuxiliary(taddeo)\n\nAuxiliary(taddeo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Cammi is pocketable. Alane is lucky. Blue people are semite. Red, shoed people are pocketable. If someone is shoed and mastered then they are pocketable. If Cammi is pocketable then Cammi is semite. If someone is pocketable and unbanded then they are lucky. If Alane is semite then Alane is lucky. All semite people are unbanded. Quiet people are shoed. Cammi is pocketable.", "logic": "\nPocketable(cammi)\nLucky(alane)\nforall x (Shoed(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) and Shoed(x) -> Pocketable(x))\nforall x (Shoed(x) and Mastered(x) -> Pocketable(x))\nPocketable(cammi) -> Semite(cammi)\nforall x (Pocketable(x) and Unbanded(x) -> Lucky(x))\nSemite(alane) -> Lucky(alane)\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Unbanded(x))\nforall x (Pocketable(x) -> Shoed(x))\n\nPocketable(cammi)\n\ntherefore Pocketable(cammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Cherey is assertable. Yank is seeded. Blue people are cognitive. Red, bipartizan people are assertable. If someone is bipartizan and lymphatic then they are assertable. If Cherey is assertable then Cherey is cognitive. If someone is assertable and tetanic then they are seeded. If Yank is cognitive then Yank is seeded. All cognitive people are tetanic. Quiet people are bipartizan. Yank is not seeded.", "logic": "\nAssertable(cherey)\nSeeded(yank)\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> Cognitive(x))\nforall x (Cognitive(x) and Bipartizan(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) and Lymphatic(x) -> Assertable(x))\nAssertable(cherey) -> Cognitive(cherey)\nforall x (Assertable(x) and Tetanic(x) -> Seeded(x))\nCognitive(yank) -> Seeded(yank)\nforall x (Cognitive(x) -> Tetanic(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Bipartizan(x))\n\nnot Seeded(yank)\n\ntherefore Seeded(yank)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Ruben is cyprinid. Electra is occasional. Blue people are chinese. Red, lissome people are cyprinid. If someone is lissome and unbarred then they are cyprinid. If Ruben is cyprinid then Ruben is chinese. If someone is cyprinid and sustained then they are occasional. If Electra is chinese then Electra is occasional. All chinese people are sustained. Quiet people are lissome. Ruben is chinese.", "logic": "\nCyprinid(ruben)\nOccasional(electra)\nforall x (Lissome(x) -> Chinese(x))\nforall x (Chinese(x) and Lissome(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Lissome(x) and Unbarred(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nCyprinid(ruben) -> Chinese(ruben)\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Sustained(x) -> Occasional(x))\nChinese(electra) -> Occasional(electra)\nforall x (Chinese(x) -> Sustained(x))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) -> Lissome(x))\n\nChinese(ruben)\n\nCyprinid(ruben) and Cyprinid(ruben) -> Chinese(ruben) -> therefore Chinese(ruben)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Lawerence is travelable. Annabelle is chiasmatic. Blue people are spiderlike. Red, germfree people are travelable. If someone is germfree and ensuing then they are travelable. If Lawerence is travelable then Lawerence is spiderlike. If someone is travelable and shadowed then they are chiasmatic. If Annabelle is spiderlike then Annabelle is chiasmatic. All spiderlike people are shadowed. Quiet people are germfree. Lawerence is not germfree.", "logic": "\nTravelable(lawerence)\nChiasmatic(annabelle)\nforall x (Germfree(x) -> Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) and Germfree(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) and Ensuing(x) -> Travelable(x))\nTravelable(lawerence) -> Spiderlike(lawerence)\nforall x (Travelable(x) and Shadowed(x) -> Chiasmatic(x))\nSpiderlike(annabelle) -> Chiasmatic(annabelle)\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Shadowed(x))\nforall x (Travelable(x) -> Germfree(x))\n\nnot Germfree(lawerence)\n\nTravelable(lawerence) and forall x (Travelable(x) -> Germfree(x)) -> therefore Germfree(lawerence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Latisha is unselected. Cordula is punitive. Blue people are crural. Red, unmingled people are unselected. If someone is unmingled and tractive then they are unselected. If Latisha is unselected then Latisha is crural. If someone is unselected and outmost then they are punitive. If Cordula is crural then Cordula is punitive. All crural people are outmost. Quiet people are unmingled. Latisha is outmost.", "logic": "\nUnselected(latisha)\nPunitive(cordula)\nforall x (Unmingled(x) -> Crural(x))\nforall x (Crural(x) and Unmingled(x) -> Unselected(x))\nforall x (Unmingled(x) and Tractive(x) -> Unselected(x))\nUnselected(latisha) -> Crural(latisha)\nforall x (Unselected(x) and Outmost(x) -> Punitive(x))\nCrural(cordula) -> Punitive(cordula)\nforall x (Crural(x) -> Outmost(x))\nforall x (Unselected(x) -> Unmingled(x))\n\nOutmost(latisha)\n\nUnselected(latisha) and Unselected(latisha) -> Crural(latisha) -> therefore Crural(latisha) Crural(latisha) and forall x (Crural(x) -> Outmost(x)) -> therefore Outmost(latisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Carri is inside. Beret is windswept. Blue people are almighty. Red, getable people are inside. If someone is getable and tearaway then they are inside. If Carri is inside then Carri is almighty. If someone is inside and unnameable then they are windswept. If Beret is almighty then Beret is windswept. All almighty people are unnameable. Quiet people are getable. Carri is not unnameable.", "logic": "\nInside(carri)\nWindswept(beret)\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Almighty(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) and Getable(x) -> Inside(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) and Tearaway(x) -> Inside(x))\nInside(carri) -> Almighty(carri)\nforall x (Inside(x) and Unnameable(x) -> Windswept(x))\nAlmighty(beret) -> Windswept(beret)\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Unnameable(x))\nforall x (Inside(x) -> Getable(x))\n\nnot Unnameable(carri)\n\nInside(carri) and Inside(carri) -> Almighty(carri) -> therefore Almighty(carri) Almighty(carri) and forall x (Almighty(x) -> Unnameable(x)) -> therefore Unnameable(carri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Waly is kitschy. Apollo is blended. Blue people are sweltry. Red, olympic people are kitschy. If someone is olympic and announced then they are kitschy. If Waly is kitschy then Waly is sweltry. If someone is kitschy and hifalutin then they are blended. If Apollo is sweltry then Apollo is blended. All sweltry people are hifalutin. Quiet people are olympic. Apollo is not sweltry.", "logic": "\nKitschy(waly)\nBlended(apollo)\nforall x (Olympic(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Olympic(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Olympic(x) and Announced(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nKitschy(waly) -> Sweltry(waly)\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Hifalutin(x) -> Blended(x))\nSweltry(apollo) -> Blended(apollo)\nforall x (Sweltry(x) -> Hifalutin(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Olympic(x))\n\nnot Sweltry(apollo)\n\nforall x (Olympic(x) -> Sweltry(x)) <- forall x (Kitschy(x) -> Olympic(x)) <- forall x (Sweltry(x) and Olympic(x) -> Kitschy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Rina is lubricious. Aili is bathetic. Blue people are ravenous. Red, acanthotic people are lubricious. If someone is acanthotic and systemic then they are lubricious. If Rina is lubricious then Rina is ravenous. If someone is lubricious and windblown then they are bathetic. If Aili is ravenous then Aili is bathetic. All ravenous people are windblown. Quiet people are acanthotic. Aili is lubricious.", "logic": "\nLubricious(rina)\nBathetic(aili)\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) -> Ravenous(x))\nforall x (Ravenous(x) and Acanthotic(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) and Systemic(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nLubricious(rina) -> Ravenous(rina)\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Windblown(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nRavenous(aili) -> Bathetic(aili)\nforall x (Ravenous(x) -> Windblown(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) -> Acanthotic(x))\n\nLubricious(aili)\n\nforall x (Ravenous(x) and Acanthotic(x) -> Lubricious(x)) <- forall x (Lubricious(x) -> Acanthotic(x)) <- forall x (Acanthotic(x) and Systemic(x) -> Lubricious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Kane is xxviii. Hunt is void. Blue people are collusive. Red, loaded people are xxviii. If someone is loaded and dietetical then they are xxviii. If Kane is xxviii then Kane is collusive. If someone is xxviii and honduran then they are void. If Hunt is collusive then Hunt is void. All collusive people are honduran. Quiet people are loaded. Hunt is not loaded.", "logic": "\nXxviii(kane)\nVoid(hunt)\nforall x (Loaded(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) and Loaded(x) -> Xxviii(x))\nforall x (Loaded(x) and Dietetical(x) -> Xxviii(x))\nXxviii(kane) -> Collusive(kane)\nforall x (Xxviii(x) and Honduran(x) -> Void(x))\nCollusive(hunt) -> Void(hunt)\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Honduran(x))\nforall x (Xxviii(x) -> Loaded(x))\n\nnot Loaded(hunt)\n\nforall x (Xxviii(x) -> Loaded(x)) <- forall x (Collusive(x) and Loaded(x) -> Xxviii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Charlean is penetrable. Yolane is crapulous. Blue people are undersized. Red, honest people are penetrable. If someone is honest and heralded then they are penetrable. If Charlean is penetrable then Charlean is undersized. If someone is penetrable and connective then they are crapulous. If Yolane is undersized then Yolane is crapulous. All undersized people are connective. Quiet people are honest. Yolane is heralded.", "logic": "\nPenetrable(charlean)\nCrapulous(yolane)\nforall x (Honest(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Honest(x) -> Penetrable(x))\nforall x (Honest(x) and Heralded(x) -> Penetrable(x))\nPenetrable(charlean) -> Undersized(charlean)\nforall x (Penetrable(x) and Connective(x) -> Crapulous(x))\nUndersized(yolane) -> Crapulous(yolane)\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Penetrable(x) -> Honest(x))\n\nHeralded(yolane)\n\nHeralded(yolane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Genovera is ideologic. Nikolai is fatalistic. Blue people are fledgeless. Red, vulcanised people are ideologic. If someone is vulcanised and clinical then they are ideologic. If Genovera is ideologic then Genovera is fledgeless. If someone is ideologic and blustering then they are fatalistic. If Nikolai is fledgeless then Nikolai is fatalistic. All fledgeless people are blustering. Quiet people are vulcanised. Genovera is not clinical.", "logic": "\nIdeologic(genovera)\nFatalistic(nikolai)\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Fledgeless(x))\nforall x (Fledgeless(x) and Vulcanised(x) -> Ideologic(x))\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) and Clinical(x) -> Ideologic(x))\nIdeologic(genovera) -> Fledgeless(genovera)\nforall x (Ideologic(x) and Blustering(x) -> Fatalistic(x))\nFledgeless(nikolai) -> Fatalistic(nikolai)\nforall x (Fledgeless(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Ideologic(x) -> Vulcanised(x))\n\nnot Clinical(genovera)\n\nnot Clinical(genovera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "Philomena is sumatran. Marnie is cutaneous. Blue people are proximate. Red, bass people are sumatran. If someone is bass and sporty then they are sumatran. If Philomena is sumatran then Philomena is proximate. If someone is sumatran and gossipy then they are cutaneous. If Marnie is proximate then Marnie is cutaneous. All proximate people are gossipy. Quiet people are bass. Marnie is young.", "logic": "\nSumatran(philomena)\nCutaneous(marnie)\nforall x (Bass(x) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) and Bass(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nforall x (Bass(x) and Sporty(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nSumatran(philomena) -> Proximate(philomena)\nforall x (Sumatran(x) and Gossipy(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nProximate(marnie) -> Cutaneous(marnie)\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Gossipy(x))\nforall x (Sumatran(x) -> Bass(x))\n\nYoung(marnie)\n\nYoung(marnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2378"} {"premises": "The charil is segmental. The charil succour the tilly. The charil expire the tilly. The charil expire the erica. The tilly is restless. The tilly is absolute. The tilly succour the charil. The tilly succour the erica. The tilly expire the charil. The tilly expire the erica. The erica is desiccate. The erica succour the charil. The erica succour the tilly. The erica dizen the charil. The erica expire the charil. The erica expire the tilly. If something is restless then it succour the erica. If something succour the tilly then it is absolute. If the charil is absolute and the charil expire the tilly then the charil succour the erica. If the tilly is segmental then the tilly succour the erica. If something is avifaunal then it is segmental. If something dizen the charil and it succour the erica then the erica expire the tilly. If something succour the charil and it is desiccate then it dizen the erica. If the charil dizen the erica and the charil succour the erica then the charil dizen the tilly. The charil expire the tilly.", "logic": "\nSegmental(charil)\nSuccour(charil, tilly)\nExpire(charil, tilly)\nExpire(charil, erica)\nRestless(tilly)\nAbsolute(tilly)\nSuccour(tilly, charil)\nSuccour(tilly, erica)\nExpire(tilly, charil)\nExpire(tilly, erica)\nDesiccate(erica)\nSuccour(erica, charil)\nSuccour(erica, tilly)\nDizen(erica, charil)\nExpire(erica, charil)\nExpire(erica, tilly)\nforall x (Restless(x) -> Succour(x, erica))\nforall x (Succour(x, tilly) -> Absolute(x))\nAbsolute(charil) and Expire(charil, tilly) -> Succour(charil, erica)\nSegmental(tilly) -> Succour(tilly, erica)\nforall x (Avifaunal(x) -> Segmental(x))\nforall x (Dizen(x, charil) and Succour(x, erica) -> Expire(erica, tilly))\nforall x (Succour(x, charil) and Desiccate(x) -> Dizen(x, erica))\nDizen(charil, erica) and Succour(charil, erica) -> Dizen(charil, tilly)\n\nExpire(charil, tilly)\n\ntherefore Expire(charil, tilly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The manuel is wordless. The manuel spruce the kori. The manuel warrant the kori. The manuel warrant the melania. The kori is floating. The kori is isentropic. The kori spruce the manuel. The kori spruce the melania. The kori warrant the manuel. The kori warrant the melania. The melania is uncoloured. The melania spruce the manuel. The melania spruce the kori. The melania maintain the manuel. The melania warrant the manuel. The melania warrant the kori. If something is floating then it spruce the melania. If something spruce the kori then it is isentropic. If the manuel is isentropic and the manuel warrant the kori then the manuel spruce the melania. If the kori is wordless then the kori spruce the melania. If something is dismaying then it is wordless. If something maintain the manuel and it spruce the melania then the melania warrant the kori. If something spruce the manuel and it is uncoloured then it maintain the melania. If the manuel maintain the melania and the manuel spruce the melania then the manuel maintain the kori. The kori does not see the manuel.", "logic": "\nWordless(manuel)\nSpruce(manuel, kori)\nWarrant(manuel, kori)\nWarrant(manuel, melania)\nFloating(kori)\nIsentropic(kori)\nSpruce(kori, manuel)\nSpruce(kori, melania)\nWarrant(kori, manuel)\nWarrant(kori, melania)\nUncoloured(melania)\nSpruce(melania, manuel)\nSpruce(melania, kori)\nMaintain(melania, manuel)\nWarrant(melania, manuel)\nWarrant(melania, kori)\nforall x (Floating(x) -> Spruce(x, melania))\nforall x (Spruce(x, kori) -> Isentropic(x))\nIsentropic(manuel) and Warrant(manuel, kori) -> Spruce(manuel, melania)\nWordless(kori) -> Spruce(kori, melania)\nforall x (Dismaying(x) -> Wordless(x))\nforall x (Maintain(x, manuel) and Spruce(x, melania) -> Warrant(melania, kori))\nforall x (Spruce(x, manuel) and Uncoloured(x) -> Maintain(x, melania))\nMaintain(manuel, melania) and Spruce(manuel, melania) -> Maintain(manuel, kori)\n\nnot Warrant(kori, manuel)\n\ntherefore Warrant(kori, manuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The barnie is celiac. The barnie idle the bruno. The barnie desecrate the bruno. The barnie desecrate the joletta. The bruno is humoral. The bruno is friable. The bruno idle the barnie. The bruno idle the joletta. The bruno desecrate the barnie. The bruno desecrate the joletta. The joletta is volcanic. The joletta idle the barnie. The joletta idle the bruno. The joletta practise the barnie. The joletta desecrate the barnie. The joletta desecrate the bruno. If something is humoral then it idle the joletta. If something idle the bruno then it is friable. If the barnie is friable and the barnie desecrate the bruno then the barnie idle the joletta. If the bruno is celiac then the bruno idle the joletta. If something is downy then it is celiac. If something practise the barnie and it idle the joletta then the joletta desecrate the bruno. If something idle the barnie and it is volcanic then it practise the joletta. If the barnie practise the joletta and the barnie idle the joletta then the barnie practise the bruno. The joletta practise the joletta.", "logic": "\nCeliac(barnie)\nIdle(barnie, bruno)\nDesecrate(barnie, bruno)\nDesecrate(barnie, joletta)\nHumoral(bruno)\nFriable(bruno)\nIdle(bruno, barnie)\nIdle(bruno, joletta)\nDesecrate(bruno, barnie)\nDesecrate(bruno, joletta)\nVolcanic(joletta)\nIdle(joletta, barnie)\nIdle(joletta, bruno)\nPractise(joletta, barnie)\nDesecrate(joletta, barnie)\nDesecrate(joletta, bruno)\nforall x (Humoral(x) -> Idle(x, joletta))\nforall x (Idle(x, bruno) -> Friable(x))\nFriable(barnie) and Desecrate(barnie, bruno) -> Idle(barnie, joletta)\nCeliac(bruno) -> Idle(bruno, joletta)\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Celiac(x))\nforall x (Practise(x, barnie) and Idle(x, joletta) -> Desecrate(joletta, bruno))\nforall x (Idle(x, barnie) and Volcanic(x) -> Practise(x, joletta))\nPractise(barnie, joletta) and Idle(barnie, joletta) -> Practise(barnie, bruno)\n\nPractise(joletta, joletta)\n\nIdle(joletta, barnie) and Volcanic(joletta) and forall x (Idle(x, barnie) and Volcanic(x) -> Practise(x, joletta)) -> therefore Practise(joletta, joletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The moya is crookback. The moya underquote the phillida. The moya pooch the phillida. The moya pooch the brady. The phillida is bedded. The phillida is wakeless. The phillida underquote the moya. The phillida underquote the brady. The phillida pooch the moya. The phillida pooch the brady. The brady is fragile. The brady underquote the moya. The brady underquote the phillida. The brady detect the moya. The brady pooch the moya. The brady pooch the phillida. If something is bedded then it underquote the brady. If something underquote the phillida then it is wakeless. If the moya is wakeless and the moya pooch the phillida then the moya underquote the brady. If the phillida is crookback then the phillida underquote the brady. If something is priapic then it is crookback. If something detect the moya and it underquote the brady then the brady pooch the phillida. If something underquote the moya and it is fragile then it detect the brady. If the moya detect the brady and the moya underquote the brady then the moya detect the phillida. The brady does not need the brady.", "logic": "\nCrookback(moya)\nUnderquote(moya, phillida)\nPooch(moya, phillida)\nPooch(moya, brady)\nBedded(phillida)\nWakeless(phillida)\nUnderquote(phillida, moya)\nUnderquote(phillida, brady)\nPooch(phillida, moya)\nPooch(phillida, brady)\nFragile(brady)\nUnderquote(brady, moya)\nUnderquote(brady, phillida)\nDetect(brady, moya)\nPooch(brady, moya)\nPooch(brady, phillida)\nforall x (Bedded(x) -> Underquote(x, brady))\nforall x (Underquote(x, phillida) -> Wakeless(x))\nWakeless(moya) and Pooch(moya, phillida) -> Underquote(moya, brady)\nCrookback(phillida) -> Underquote(phillida, brady)\nforall x (Priapic(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Detect(x, moya) and Underquote(x, brady) -> Pooch(brady, phillida))\nforall x (Underquote(x, moya) and Fragile(x) -> Detect(x, brady))\nDetect(moya, brady) and Underquote(moya, brady) -> Detect(moya, phillida)\n\nnot Detect(brady, brady)\n\nUnderquote(brady, moya) and Fragile(brady) and forall x (Underquote(x, moya) and Fragile(x) -> Detect(x, brady)) -> therefore Detect(brady, brady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The roseanne is worrying. The roseanne peruse the stillmann. The roseanne disembowel the stillmann. The roseanne disembowel the letty. The stillmann is combinable. The stillmann is acerose. The stillmann peruse the roseanne. The stillmann peruse the letty. The stillmann disembowel the roseanne. The stillmann disembowel the letty. The letty is impeded. The letty peruse the roseanne. The letty peruse the stillmann. The letty doodle the roseanne. The letty disembowel the roseanne. The letty disembowel the stillmann. If something is combinable then it peruse the letty. If something peruse the stillmann then it is acerose. If the roseanne is acerose and the roseanne disembowel the stillmann then the roseanne peruse the letty. If the stillmann is worrying then the stillmann peruse the letty. If something is ascendant then it is worrying. If something doodle the roseanne and it peruse the letty then the letty disembowel the stillmann. If something peruse the roseanne and it is impeded then it doodle the letty. If the roseanne doodle the letty and the roseanne peruse the letty then the roseanne doodle the stillmann. The roseanne peruse the letty.", "logic": "\nWorrying(roseanne)\nPeruse(roseanne, stillmann)\nDisembowel(roseanne, stillmann)\nDisembowel(roseanne, letty)\nCombinable(stillmann)\nAcerose(stillmann)\nPeruse(stillmann, roseanne)\nPeruse(stillmann, letty)\nDisembowel(stillmann, roseanne)\nDisembowel(stillmann, letty)\nImpeded(letty)\nPeruse(letty, roseanne)\nPeruse(letty, stillmann)\nDoodle(letty, roseanne)\nDisembowel(letty, roseanne)\nDisembowel(letty, stillmann)\nforall x (Combinable(x) -> Peruse(x, letty))\nforall x (Peruse(x, stillmann) -> Acerose(x))\nAcerose(roseanne) and Disembowel(roseanne, stillmann) -> Peruse(roseanne, letty)\nWorrying(stillmann) -> Peruse(stillmann, letty)\nforall x (Ascendant(x) -> Worrying(x))\nforall x (Doodle(x, roseanne) and Peruse(x, letty) -> Disembowel(letty, stillmann))\nforall x (Peruse(x, roseanne) and Impeded(x) -> Doodle(x, letty))\nDoodle(roseanne, letty) and Peruse(roseanne, letty) -> Doodle(roseanne, stillmann)\n\nPeruse(roseanne, letty)\n\nPeruse(roseanne, stillmann) and forall x (Peruse(x, stillmann) -> Acerose(x)) -> therefore Acerose(roseanne) Acerose(roseanne) and Disembowel(roseanne, stillmann) and Acerose(roseanne) and Disembowel(roseanne, stillmann) -> Peruse(roseanne, letty) -> therefore Peruse(roseanne, letty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The jacki is scrimpy. The jacki disavow the raye. The jacki rafter the raye. The jacki rafter the eleanor. The raye is devalued. The raye is subocean. The raye disavow the jacki. The raye disavow the eleanor. The raye rafter the jacki. The raye rafter the eleanor. The eleanor is farcical. The eleanor disavow the jacki. The eleanor disavow the raye. The eleanor specialize the jacki. The eleanor rafter the jacki. The eleanor rafter the raye. If something is devalued then it disavow the eleanor. If something disavow the raye then it is subocean. If the jacki is subocean and the jacki rafter the raye then the jacki disavow the eleanor. If the raye is scrimpy then the raye disavow the eleanor. If something is unactable then it is scrimpy. If something specialize the jacki and it disavow the eleanor then the eleanor rafter the raye. If something disavow the jacki and it is farcical then it specialize the eleanor. If the jacki specialize the eleanor and the jacki disavow the eleanor then the jacki specialize the raye. The jacki does not like the eleanor.", "logic": "\nScrimpy(jacki)\nDisavow(jacki, raye)\nRafter(jacki, raye)\nRafter(jacki, eleanor)\nDevalued(raye)\nSubocean(raye)\nDisavow(raye, jacki)\nDisavow(raye, eleanor)\nRafter(raye, jacki)\nRafter(raye, eleanor)\nFarcical(eleanor)\nDisavow(eleanor, jacki)\nDisavow(eleanor, raye)\nSpecialize(eleanor, jacki)\nRafter(eleanor, jacki)\nRafter(eleanor, raye)\nforall x (Devalued(x) -> Disavow(x, eleanor))\nforall x (Disavow(x, raye) -> Subocean(x))\nSubocean(jacki) and Rafter(jacki, raye) -> Disavow(jacki, eleanor)\nScrimpy(raye) -> Disavow(raye, eleanor)\nforall x (Unactable(x) -> Scrimpy(x))\nforall x (Specialize(x, jacki) and Disavow(x, eleanor) -> Rafter(eleanor, raye))\nforall x (Disavow(x, jacki) and Farcical(x) -> Specialize(x, eleanor))\nSpecialize(jacki, eleanor) and Disavow(jacki, eleanor) -> Specialize(jacki, raye)\n\nnot Disavow(jacki, eleanor)\n\nDisavow(jacki, raye) and forall x (Disavow(x, raye) -> Subocean(x)) -> therefore Subocean(jacki) Subocean(jacki) and Rafter(jacki, raye) and Subocean(jacki) and Rafter(jacki, raye) -> Disavow(jacki, eleanor) -> therefore Disavow(jacki, eleanor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The marina is tepid. The marina subsist the hyacintha. The marina fowl the hyacintha. The marina fowl the rosalinda. The hyacintha is zany. The hyacintha is goaded. The hyacintha subsist the marina. The hyacintha subsist the rosalinda. The hyacintha fowl the marina. The hyacintha fowl the rosalinda. The rosalinda is unwonted. The rosalinda subsist the marina. The rosalinda subsist the hyacintha. The rosalinda boldface the marina. The rosalinda fowl the marina. The rosalinda fowl the hyacintha. If something is zany then it subsist the rosalinda. If something subsist the hyacintha then it is goaded. If the marina is goaded and the marina fowl the hyacintha then the marina subsist the rosalinda. If the hyacintha is tepid then the hyacintha subsist the rosalinda. If something is sacred then it is tepid. If something boldface the marina and it subsist the rosalinda then the rosalinda fowl the hyacintha. If something subsist the marina and it is unwonted then it boldface the rosalinda. If the marina boldface the rosalinda and the marina subsist the rosalinda then the marina boldface the hyacintha. The marina does not need the hyacintha.", "logic": "\nTepid(marina)\nSubsist(marina, hyacintha)\nFowl(marina, hyacintha)\nFowl(marina, rosalinda)\nZany(hyacintha)\nGoaded(hyacintha)\nSubsist(hyacintha, marina)\nSubsist(hyacintha, rosalinda)\nFowl(hyacintha, marina)\nFowl(hyacintha, rosalinda)\nUnwonted(rosalinda)\nSubsist(rosalinda, marina)\nSubsist(rosalinda, hyacintha)\nBoldface(rosalinda, marina)\nFowl(rosalinda, marina)\nFowl(rosalinda, hyacintha)\nforall x (Zany(x) -> Subsist(x, rosalinda))\nforall x (Subsist(x, hyacintha) -> Goaded(x))\nGoaded(marina) and Fowl(marina, hyacintha) -> Subsist(marina, rosalinda)\nTepid(hyacintha) -> Subsist(hyacintha, rosalinda)\nforall x (Sacred(x) -> Tepid(x))\nforall x (Boldface(x, marina) and Subsist(x, rosalinda) -> Fowl(rosalinda, hyacintha))\nforall x (Subsist(x, marina) and Unwonted(x) -> Boldface(x, rosalinda))\nBoldface(marina, rosalinda) and Subsist(marina, rosalinda) -> Boldface(marina, hyacintha)\n\nnot Boldface(marina, hyacintha)\n\nBoldface(marina, rosalinda) and Subsist(marina, rosalinda) -> Boldface(marina, hyacintha) <- forall x (Subsist(x, marina) and Unwonted(x) -> Boldface(x, rosalinda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The josselyn is fuggy. The josselyn overtax the wynn. The josselyn unman the wynn. The josselyn unman the bruno. The wynn is brimming. The wynn is decreed. The wynn overtax the josselyn. The wynn overtax the bruno. The wynn unman the josselyn. The wynn unman the bruno. The bruno is bowery. The bruno overtax the josselyn. The bruno overtax the wynn. The bruno enucleate the josselyn. The bruno unman the josselyn. The bruno unman the wynn. If something is brimming then it overtax the bruno. If something overtax the wynn then it is decreed. If the josselyn is decreed and the josselyn unman the wynn then the josselyn overtax the bruno. If the wynn is fuggy then the wynn overtax the bruno. If something is unromantic then it is fuggy. If something enucleate the josselyn and it overtax the bruno then the bruno unman the wynn. If something overtax the josselyn and it is bowery then it enucleate the bruno. If the josselyn enucleate the bruno and the josselyn overtax the bruno then the josselyn enucleate the wynn. The wynn enucleate the bruno.", "logic": "\nFuggy(josselyn)\nOvertax(josselyn, wynn)\nUnman(josselyn, wynn)\nUnman(josselyn, bruno)\nBrimming(wynn)\nDecreed(wynn)\nOvertax(wynn, josselyn)\nOvertax(wynn, bruno)\nUnman(wynn, josselyn)\nUnman(wynn, bruno)\nBowery(bruno)\nOvertax(bruno, josselyn)\nOvertax(bruno, wynn)\nEnucleate(bruno, josselyn)\nUnman(bruno, josselyn)\nUnman(bruno, wynn)\nforall x (Brimming(x) -> Overtax(x, bruno))\nforall x (Overtax(x, wynn) -> Decreed(x))\nDecreed(josselyn) and Unman(josselyn, wynn) -> Overtax(josselyn, bruno)\nFuggy(wynn) -> Overtax(wynn, bruno)\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Enucleate(x, josselyn) and Overtax(x, bruno) -> Unman(bruno, wynn))\nforall x (Overtax(x, josselyn) and Bowery(x) -> Enucleate(x, bruno))\nEnucleate(josselyn, bruno) and Overtax(josselyn, bruno) -> Enucleate(josselyn, wynn)\n\nEnucleate(wynn, bruno)\n\nforall x (Overtax(x, josselyn) and Bowery(x) -> Enucleate(x, bruno)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The nalani is butcherly. The nalani coke the maridel. The nalani brooch the maridel. The nalani brooch the plato. The maridel is extensile. The maridel is looking. The maridel coke the nalani. The maridel coke the plato. The maridel brooch the nalani. The maridel brooch the plato. The plato is blamable. The plato coke the nalani. The plato coke the maridel. The plato bond the nalani. The plato brooch the nalani. The plato brooch the maridel. If something is extensile then it coke the plato. If something coke the maridel then it is looking. If the nalani is looking and the nalani brooch the maridel then the nalani coke the plato. If the maridel is butcherly then the maridel coke the plato. If something is unwavering then it is butcherly. If something bond the nalani and it coke the plato then the plato brooch the maridel. If something coke the nalani and it is blamable then it bond the plato. If the nalani bond the plato and the nalani coke the plato then the nalani bond the maridel. The nalani does not need the plato.", "logic": "\nButcherly(nalani)\nCoke(nalani, maridel)\nBrooch(nalani, maridel)\nBrooch(nalani, plato)\nExtensile(maridel)\nLooking(maridel)\nCoke(maridel, nalani)\nCoke(maridel, plato)\nBrooch(maridel, nalani)\nBrooch(maridel, plato)\nBlamable(plato)\nCoke(plato, nalani)\nCoke(plato, maridel)\nBond(plato, nalani)\nBrooch(plato, nalani)\nBrooch(plato, maridel)\nforall x (Extensile(x) -> Coke(x, plato))\nforall x (Coke(x, maridel) -> Looking(x))\nLooking(nalani) and Brooch(nalani, maridel) -> Coke(nalani, plato)\nButcherly(maridel) -> Coke(maridel, plato)\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Bond(x, nalani) and Coke(x, plato) -> Brooch(plato, maridel))\nforall x (Coke(x, nalani) and Blamable(x) -> Bond(x, plato))\nBond(nalani, plato) and Coke(nalani, plato) -> Bond(nalani, maridel)\n\nnot Bond(nalani, plato)\n\nforall x (Coke(x, nalani) and Blamable(x) -> Bond(x, plato)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The anya is festal. The anya brutalise the bellanca. The anya coquette the bellanca. The anya coquette the trudey. The bellanca is ilxx. The bellanca is narrow. The bellanca brutalise the anya. The bellanca brutalise the trudey. The bellanca coquette the anya. The bellanca coquette the trudey. The trudey is woven. The trudey brutalise the anya. The trudey brutalise the bellanca. The trudey snowmobile the anya. The trudey coquette the anya. The trudey coquette the bellanca. If something is ilxx then it brutalise the trudey. If something brutalise the bellanca then it is narrow. If the anya is narrow and the anya coquette the bellanca then the anya brutalise the trudey. If the bellanca is festal then the bellanca brutalise the trudey. If something is venomous then it is festal. If something snowmobile the anya and it brutalise the trudey then the trudey coquette the bellanca. If something brutalise the anya and it is woven then it snowmobile the trudey. If the anya snowmobile the trudey and the anya brutalise the trudey then the anya snowmobile the bellanca. The anya is woven.", "logic": "\nFestal(anya)\nBrutalise(anya, bellanca)\nCoquette(anya, bellanca)\nCoquette(anya, trudey)\nIlxx(bellanca)\nNarrow(bellanca)\nBrutalise(bellanca, anya)\nBrutalise(bellanca, trudey)\nCoquette(bellanca, anya)\nCoquette(bellanca, trudey)\nWoven(trudey)\nBrutalise(trudey, anya)\nBrutalise(trudey, bellanca)\nSnowmobile(trudey, anya)\nCoquette(trudey, anya)\nCoquette(trudey, bellanca)\nforall x (Ilxx(x) -> Brutalise(x, trudey))\nforall x (Brutalise(x, bellanca) -> Narrow(x))\nNarrow(anya) and Coquette(anya, bellanca) -> Brutalise(anya, trudey)\nFestal(bellanca) -> Brutalise(bellanca, trudey)\nforall x (Venomous(x) -> Festal(x))\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, anya) and Brutalise(x, trudey) -> Coquette(trudey, bellanca))\nforall x (Brutalise(x, anya) and Woven(x) -> Snowmobile(x, trudey))\nSnowmobile(anya, trudey) and Brutalise(anya, trudey) -> Snowmobile(anya, bellanca)\n\nWoven(anya)\n\nWoven(anya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The berni is speedy. The berni dimension the lottie. The berni grimace the lottie. The berni grimace the annabel. The lottie is filipino. The lottie is polyglot. The lottie dimension the berni. The lottie dimension the annabel. The lottie grimace the berni. The lottie grimace the annabel. The annabel is faecal. The annabel dimension the berni. The annabel dimension the lottie. The annabel whack the berni. The annabel grimace the berni. The annabel grimace the lottie. If something is filipino then it dimension the annabel. If something dimension the lottie then it is polyglot. If the berni is polyglot and the berni grimace the lottie then the berni dimension the annabel. If the lottie is speedy then the lottie dimension the annabel. If something is panoptic then it is speedy. If something whack the berni and it dimension the annabel then the annabel grimace the lottie. If something dimension the berni and it is faecal then it whack the annabel. If the berni whack the annabel and the berni dimension the annabel then the berni whack the lottie. The annabel does not see the annabel.", "logic": "\nSpeedy(berni)\nDimension(berni, lottie)\nGrimace(berni, lottie)\nGrimace(berni, annabel)\nFilipino(lottie)\nPolyglot(lottie)\nDimension(lottie, berni)\nDimension(lottie, annabel)\nGrimace(lottie, berni)\nGrimace(lottie, annabel)\nFaecal(annabel)\nDimension(annabel, berni)\nDimension(annabel, lottie)\nWhack(annabel, berni)\nGrimace(annabel, berni)\nGrimace(annabel, lottie)\nforall x (Filipino(x) -> Dimension(x, annabel))\nforall x (Dimension(x, lottie) -> Polyglot(x))\nPolyglot(berni) and Grimace(berni, lottie) -> Dimension(berni, annabel)\nSpeedy(lottie) -> Dimension(lottie, annabel)\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Speedy(x))\nforall x (Whack(x, berni) and Dimension(x, annabel) -> Grimace(annabel, lottie))\nforall x (Dimension(x, berni) and Faecal(x) -> Whack(x, annabel))\nWhack(berni, annabel) and Dimension(berni, annabel) -> Whack(berni, lottie)\n\nnot Grimace(annabel, annabel)\n\nnot Grimace(annabel, annabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The malva is unassuming. The malva rise the adolphe. The malva flambe the adolphe. The malva flambe the werner. The adolphe is vulnerable. The adolphe is endoscopic. The adolphe rise the malva. The adolphe rise the werner. The adolphe flambe the malva. The adolphe flambe the werner. The werner is duncish. The werner rise the malva. The werner rise the adolphe. The werner card the malva. The werner flambe the malva. The werner flambe the adolphe. If something is vulnerable then it rise the werner. If something rise the adolphe then it is endoscopic. If the malva is endoscopic and the malva flambe the adolphe then the malva rise the werner. If the adolphe is unassuming then the adolphe rise the werner. If something is bicoloured then it is unassuming. If something card the malva and it rise the werner then the werner flambe the adolphe. If something rise the malva and it is duncish then it card the werner. If the malva card the werner and the malva rise the werner then the malva card the adolphe. The malva is vulnerable.", "logic": "\nUnassuming(malva)\nRise(malva, adolphe)\nFlambe(malva, adolphe)\nFlambe(malva, werner)\nVulnerable(adolphe)\nEndoscopic(adolphe)\nRise(adolphe, malva)\nRise(adolphe, werner)\nFlambe(adolphe, malva)\nFlambe(adolphe, werner)\nDuncish(werner)\nRise(werner, malva)\nRise(werner, adolphe)\nCard(werner, malva)\nFlambe(werner, malva)\nFlambe(werner, adolphe)\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) -> Rise(x, werner))\nforall x (Rise(x, adolphe) -> Endoscopic(x))\nEndoscopic(malva) and Flambe(malva, adolphe) -> Rise(malva, werner)\nUnassuming(adolphe) -> Rise(adolphe, werner)\nforall x (Bicoloured(x) -> Unassuming(x))\nforall x (Card(x, malva) and Rise(x, werner) -> Flambe(werner, adolphe))\nforall x (Rise(x, malva) and Duncish(x) -> Card(x, werner))\nCard(malva, werner) and Rise(malva, werner) -> Card(malva, adolphe)\n\nVulnerable(malva)\n\nVulnerable(malva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-649"} {"premises": "The jacinta is sleepless. The jacinta is overweight. The jacinta reassert the koressa. The jacinta obey the leann. The koressa ricochet the jacinta. The koressa ricochet the leann. The koressa is utility. The koressa reassert the leann. The leann is uterine. The leann reassert the koressa. If something is sleepless and it ricochet the koressa then it ricochet the leann. If something ricochet the jacinta then the jacinta ricochet the koressa. The koressa is utility.", "logic": "\nSleepless(jacinta)\nOverweight(jacinta)\nReassert(jacinta, koressa)\nObey(jacinta, leann)\nRicochet(koressa, jacinta)\nRicochet(koressa, leann)\nUtility(koressa)\nReassert(koressa, leann)\nUterine(leann)\nReassert(leann, koressa)\nforall x (Sleepless(x) and Ricochet(x, koressa) -> Ricochet(x, leann))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, jacinta) -> Ricochet(jacinta, koressa))\n\nUtility(koressa)\n\ntherefore Utility(koressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The thatcher is known. The thatcher is meshugga. The thatcher foolproof the nova. The thatcher shmoose the juliann. The nova pomade the thatcher. The nova pomade the juliann. The nova is downlike. The nova foolproof the juliann. The juliann is frizzy. The juliann foolproof the nova. If something is known and it pomade the nova then it pomade the juliann. If something pomade the thatcher then the thatcher pomade the nova. The juliann does not like the nova.", "logic": "\nKnown(thatcher)\nMeshugga(thatcher)\nFoolproof(thatcher, nova)\nShmoose(thatcher, juliann)\nPomade(nova, thatcher)\nPomade(nova, juliann)\nDownlike(nova)\nFoolproof(nova, juliann)\nFrizzy(juliann)\nFoolproof(juliann, nova)\nforall x (Known(x) and Pomade(x, nova) -> Pomade(x, juliann))\nforall x (Pomade(x, thatcher) -> Pomade(thatcher, nova))\n\nnot Foolproof(juliann, nova)\n\ntherefore Foolproof(juliann, nova)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The dacie is blunt. The dacie is venerating. The dacie dowse the wain. The dacie closet the anny. The wain misdeliver the dacie. The wain misdeliver the anny. The wain is ignited. The wain dowse the anny. The anny is lubberly. The anny dowse the wain. If something is blunt and it misdeliver the wain then it misdeliver the anny. If something misdeliver the dacie then the dacie misdeliver the wain. The dacie misdeliver the wain.", "logic": "\nBlunt(dacie)\nVenerating(dacie)\nDowse(dacie, wain)\nCloset(dacie, anny)\nMisdeliver(wain, dacie)\nMisdeliver(wain, anny)\nIgnited(wain)\nDowse(wain, anny)\nLubberly(anny)\nDowse(anny, wain)\nforall x (Blunt(x) and Misdeliver(x, wain) -> Misdeliver(x, anny))\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, dacie) -> Misdeliver(dacie, wain))\n\nMisdeliver(dacie, wain)\n\nMisdeliver(wain, dacie) and forall x (Misdeliver(x, dacie) -> Misdeliver(dacie, wain)) -> therefore Misdeliver(dacie, wain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The cyrillus is bifid. The cyrillus is unsounded. The cyrillus abnegate the heidi. The cyrillus insult the adolfo. The heidi flex the cyrillus. The heidi flex the adolfo. The heidi is pockmarked. The heidi abnegate the adolfo. The adolfo is condemning. The adolfo abnegate the heidi. If something is bifid and it flex the heidi then it flex the adolfo. If something flex the cyrillus then the cyrillus flex the heidi. The cyrillus does not chase the heidi.", "logic": "\nBifid(cyrillus)\nUnsounded(cyrillus)\nAbnegate(cyrillus, heidi)\nInsult(cyrillus, adolfo)\nFlex(heidi, cyrillus)\nFlex(heidi, adolfo)\nPockmarked(heidi)\nAbnegate(heidi, adolfo)\nCondemning(adolfo)\nAbnegate(adolfo, heidi)\nforall x (Bifid(x) and Flex(x, heidi) -> Flex(x, adolfo))\nforall x (Flex(x, cyrillus) -> Flex(cyrillus, heidi))\n\nnot Flex(cyrillus, heidi)\n\nFlex(heidi, cyrillus) and forall x (Flex(x, cyrillus) -> Flex(cyrillus, heidi)) -> therefore Flex(cyrillus, heidi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The blaine is redbrick. The blaine is ultrasonic. The blaine warrant the vitia. The blaine gull the yanaton. The vitia creosote the blaine. The vitia creosote the yanaton. The vitia is swank. The vitia warrant the yanaton. The yanaton is anuretic. The yanaton warrant the vitia. If something is redbrick and it creosote the vitia then it creosote the yanaton. If something creosote the blaine then the blaine creosote the vitia. The blaine creosote the yanaton.", "logic": "\nRedbrick(blaine)\nUltrasonic(blaine)\nWarrant(blaine, vitia)\nGull(blaine, yanaton)\nCreosote(vitia, blaine)\nCreosote(vitia, yanaton)\nSwank(vitia)\nWarrant(vitia, yanaton)\nAnuretic(yanaton)\nWarrant(yanaton, vitia)\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and Creosote(x, vitia) -> Creosote(x, yanaton))\nforall x (Creosote(x, blaine) -> Creosote(blaine, vitia))\n\nCreosote(blaine, yanaton)\n\nCreosote(vitia, blaine) and forall x (Creosote(x, blaine) -> Creosote(blaine, vitia)) -> therefore Creosote(blaine, vitia) Redbrick(blaine) and Creosote(blaine, vitia) and forall x (Redbrick(x) and Creosote(x, vitia) -> Creosote(x, yanaton)) -> therefore Creosote(blaine, yanaton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The verine is brimming. The verine is injurious. The verine meld the ricky. The verine trounce the sasha. The ricky bestialise the verine. The ricky bestialise the sasha. The ricky is agitating. The ricky meld the sasha. The sasha is stenosed. The sasha meld the ricky. If something is brimming and it bestialise the ricky then it bestialise the sasha. If something bestialise the verine then the verine bestialise the ricky. The verine does not chase the sasha.", "logic": "\nBrimming(verine)\nInjurious(verine)\nMeld(verine, ricky)\nTrounce(verine, sasha)\nBestialise(ricky, verine)\nBestialise(ricky, sasha)\nAgitating(ricky)\nMeld(ricky, sasha)\nStenosed(sasha)\nMeld(sasha, ricky)\nforall x (Brimming(x) and Bestialise(x, ricky) -> Bestialise(x, sasha))\nforall x (Bestialise(x, verine) -> Bestialise(verine, ricky))\n\nnot Bestialise(verine, sasha)\n\nBestialise(ricky, verine) and forall x (Bestialise(x, verine) -> Bestialise(verine, ricky)) -> therefore Bestialise(verine, ricky) Brimming(verine) and Bestialise(verine, ricky) and forall x (Brimming(x) and Bestialise(x, ricky) -> Bestialise(x, sasha)) -> therefore Bestialise(verine, sasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The hanson is liii. The hanson is allantoic. The hanson oxygenise the herbert. The hanson jiggle the gracie. The herbert typify the hanson. The herbert typify the gracie. The herbert is aflame. The herbert oxygenise the gracie. The gracie is basipetal. The gracie oxygenise the herbert. If something is liii and it typify the herbert then it typify the gracie. If something typify the hanson then the hanson typify the herbert. The gracie does not chase the gracie.", "logic": "\nLiii(hanson)\nAllantoic(hanson)\nOxygenise(hanson, herbert)\nJiggle(hanson, gracie)\nTypify(herbert, hanson)\nTypify(herbert, gracie)\nAflame(herbert)\nOxygenise(herbert, gracie)\nBasipetal(gracie)\nOxygenise(gracie, herbert)\nforall x (Liii(x) and Typify(x, herbert) -> Typify(x, gracie))\nforall x (Typify(x, hanson) -> Typify(hanson, herbert))\n\nnot Typify(gracie, gracie)\n\nforall x (Liii(x) and Typify(x, herbert) -> Typify(x, gracie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The cabrina is bottomed. The cabrina is fuzzy. The cabrina undock the koral. The cabrina moon the clarinda. The koral rust the cabrina. The koral rust the clarinda. The koral is encircled. The koral undock the clarinda. The clarinda is benighted. The clarinda undock the koral. If something is bottomed and it rust the koral then it rust the clarinda. If something rust the cabrina then the cabrina rust the koral. The clarinda is encircled.", "logic": "\nBottomed(cabrina)\nFuzzy(cabrina)\nUndock(cabrina, koral)\nMoon(cabrina, clarinda)\nRust(koral, cabrina)\nRust(koral, clarinda)\nEncircled(koral)\nUndock(koral, clarinda)\nBenighted(clarinda)\nUndock(clarinda, koral)\nforall x (Bottomed(x) and Rust(x, koral) -> Rust(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Rust(x, cabrina) -> Rust(cabrina, koral))\n\nEncircled(clarinda)\n\nEncircled(clarinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The rodrick is ashy. The rodrick is cxlv. The rodrick plead the rhona. The rodrick coin the goober. The rhona premiss the rodrick. The rhona premiss the goober. The rhona is desolate. The rhona plead the goober. The goober is tongueless. The goober plead the rhona. If something is ashy and it premiss the rhona then it premiss the goober. If something premiss the rodrick then the rodrick premiss the rhona. The goober is not ashy.", "logic": "\nAshy(rodrick)\nCxlv(rodrick)\nPlead(rodrick, rhona)\nCoin(rodrick, goober)\nPremiss(rhona, rodrick)\nPremiss(rhona, goober)\nDesolate(rhona)\nPlead(rhona, goober)\nTongueless(goober)\nPlead(goober, rhona)\nforall x (Ashy(x) and Premiss(x, rhona) -> Premiss(x, goober))\nforall x (Premiss(x, rodrick) -> Premiss(rodrick, rhona))\n\nnot Ashy(goober)\n\nnot Ashy(goober) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The alia is reachable. The alia is isoclinal. The alia redact the gwennie. The alia conge the gabriel. The gwennie saturate the alia. The gwennie saturate the gabriel. The gwennie is angered. The gwennie redact the gabriel. The gabriel is comely. The gabriel redact the gwennie. If something is reachable and it saturate the gwennie then it saturate the gabriel. If something saturate the alia then the alia saturate the gwennie. The gwennie conge the gabriel.", "logic": "\nReachable(alia)\nIsoclinal(alia)\nRedact(alia, gwennie)\nConge(alia, gabriel)\nSaturate(gwennie, alia)\nSaturate(gwennie, gabriel)\nAngered(gwennie)\nRedact(gwennie, gabriel)\nComely(gabriel)\nRedact(gabriel, gwennie)\nforall x (Reachable(x) and Saturate(x, gwennie) -> Saturate(x, gabriel))\nforall x (Saturate(x, alia) -> Saturate(alia, gwennie))\n\nConge(gwennie, gabriel)\n\nConge(gwennie, gabriel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The garfinkel is bust. The garfinkel is segmental. The garfinkel expatiate the teodorico. The garfinkel deluge the robena. The teodorico pivot the garfinkel. The teodorico pivot the robena. The teodorico is gowned. The teodorico expatiate the robena. The robena is disgusted. The robena expatiate the teodorico. If something is bust and it pivot the teodorico then it pivot the robena. If something pivot the garfinkel then the garfinkel pivot the teodorico. The teodorico does not like the garfinkel.", "logic": "\nBust(garfinkel)\nSegmental(garfinkel)\nExpatiate(garfinkel, teodorico)\nDeluge(garfinkel, robena)\nPivot(teodorico, garfinkel)\nPivot(teodorico, robena)\nGowned(teodorico)\nExpatiate(teodorico, robena)\nDisgusted(robena)\nExpatiate(robena, teodorico)\nforall x (Bust(x) and Pivot(x, teodorico) -> Pivot(x, robena))\nforall x (Pivot(x, garfinkel) -> Pivot(garfinkel, teodorico))\n\nnot Expatiate(teodorico, garfinkel)\n\nnot Expatiate(teodorico, garfinkel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The leisha is thalloid. The leisha is plutonic. The leisha confab the melicent. The leisha fume the danyelle. The melicent expedite the leisha. The melicent expedite the danyelle. The melicent is polygamous. The melicent confab the danyelle. The danyelle is likeable. The danyelle confab the melicent. If something is thalloid and it expedite the melicent then it expedite the danyelle. If something expedite the leisha then the leisha expedite the melicent. The leisha confab the danyelle.", "logic": "\nThalloid(leisha)\nPlutonic(leisha)\nConfab(leisha, melicent)\nFume(leisha, danyelle)\nExpedite(melicent, leisha)\nExpedite(melicent, danyelle)\nPolygamous(melicent)\nConfab(melicent, danyelle)\nLikeable(danyelle)\nConfab(danyelle, melicent)\nforall x (Thalloid(x) and Expedite(x, melicent) -> Expedite(x, danyelle))\nforall x (Expedite(x, leisha) -> Expedite(leisha, melicent))\n\nConfab(leisha, danyelle)\n\nConfab(leisha, danyelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-546"} {"premises": "The eddi hobble the phillip. The phillip is convinced. The meira snowboard the phillip. The josi is calm. If something snowboard the josi and the josi is unextended then the josi snowboard the meira. If something is helmeted then it does not see the meira. If something snowboard the phillip then the phillip is convinced. If something hobble the phillip then it is helmeted. If something is convinced then it is not helmeted. All convinced things are unextended. If the phillip is bifacial and the phillip is helmeted then the phillip does not eat the josi. If the meira mesmerise the phillip then the phillip is calm. The eddi hobble the phillip.", "logic": "\nHobble(eddi, phillip)\nConvinced(phillip)\nSnowboard(meira, phillip)\nCalm(josi)\nforall x (Snowboard(x, josi) and Unextended(josi) -> Snowboard(josi, meira))\nforall x (Helmeted(x) -> not Hobble(x, meira))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, phillip) -> Convinced(phillip))\nforall x (Hobble(x, phillip) -> Helmeted(x))\nforall x (Convinced(x) -> not Helmeted(x))\nforall x (Convinced(x) -> Unextended(x))\nBifacial(phillip) and Helmeted(phillip) -> not Snowboard(phillip, josi)\nMesmerise(meira, phillip) -> Calm(phillip)\n\nHobble(eddi, phillip)\n\ntherefore Hobble(eddi, phillip)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The theada bait the hanna. The hanna is unnerving. The andi imagine the hanna. The finley is contracted. If something imagine the finley and the finley is bleary then the finley imagine the andi. If something is asthmatic then it does not see the andi. If something imagine the hanna then the hanna is unnerving. If something bait the hanna then it is asthmatic. If something is unnerving then it is not asthmatic. All unnerving things are bleary. If the hanna is swarthy and the hanna is asthmatic then the hanna does not eat the finley. If the andi restore the hanna then the hanna is contracted. The theada does not see the hanna.", "logic": "\nBait(theada, hanna)\nUnnerving(hanna)\nImagine(andi, hanna)\nContracted(finley)\nforall x (Imagine(x, finley) and Bleary(finley) -> Imagine(finley, andi))\nforall x (Asthmatic(x) -> not Bait(x, andi))\nforall x (Imagine(x, hanna) -> Unnerving(hanna))\nforall x (Bait(x, hanna) -> Asthmatic(x))\nforall x (Unnerving(x) -> not Asthmatic(x))\nforall x (Unnerving(x) -> Bleary(x))\nSwarthy(hanna) and Asthmatic(hanna) -> not Imagine(hanna, finley)\nRestore(andi, hanna) -> Contracted(hanna)\n\nnot Bait(theada, hanna)\n\ntherefore Bait(theada, hanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The jory derange the hally. The hally is extradural. The rorie head the hally. The hurley is papillary. If something head the hurley and the hurley is autologous then the hurley head the rorie. If something is achy then it does not see the rorie. If something head the hally then the hally is extradural. If something derange the hally then it is achy. If something is extradural then it is not achy. All extradural things are autologous. If the hally is placative and the hally is achy then the hally does not eat the hurley. If the rorie busy the hally then the hally is papillary. The hally is autologous.", "logic": "\nDerange(jory, hally)\nExtradural(hally)\nHead(rorie, hally)\nPapillary(hurley)\nforall x (Head(x, hurley) and Autologous(hurley) -> Head(hurley, rorie))\nforall x (Achy(x) -> not Derange(x, rorie))\nforall x (Head(x, hally) -> Extradural(hally))\nforall x (Derange(x, hally) -> Achy(x))\nforall x (Extradural(x) -> not Achy(x))\nforall x (Extradural(x) -> Autologous(x))\nPlacative(hally) and Achy(hally) -> not Head(hally, hurley)\nBusy(rorie, hally) -> Papillary(hally)\n\nAutologous(hally)\n\nExtradural(hally) and forall x (Extradural(x) -> Autologous(x)) -> therefore Autologous(hally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The ketty swarm the selina. The selina is wooly. The shell come the selina. The phillis is timbered. If something come the phillis and the phillis is congeneric then the phillis come the shell. If something is plethoric then it does not see the shell. If something come the selina then the selina is wooly. If something swarm the selina then it is plethoric. If something is wooly then it is not plethoric. All wooly things are congeneric. If the selina is unseeyn and the selina is plethoric then the selina does not eat the phillis. If the shell pulp the selina then the selina is timbered. The ketty is not plethoric.", "logic": "\nSwarm(ketty, selina)\nWooly(selina)\nCome(shell, selina)\nTimbered(phillis)\nforall x (Come(x, phillis) and Congeneric(phillis) -> Come(phillis, shell))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> not Swarm(x, shell))\nforall x (Come(x, selina) -> Wooly(selina))\nforall x (Swarm(x, selina) -> Plethoric(x))\nforall x (Wooly(x) -> not Plethoric(x))\nforall x (Wooly(x) -> Congeneric(x))\nUnseeyn(selina) and Plethoric(selina) -> not Come(selina, phillis)\nPulp(shell, selina) -> Timbered(selina)\n\nnot Plethoric(ketty)\n\nSwarm(ketty, selina) and forall x (Swarm(x, selina) -> Plethoric(x)) -> therefore Plethoric(ketty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The nessie foray the peggi. The peggi is archducal. The vaughan lard the peggi. The audrie is dismantled. If something lard the audrie and the audrie is abortive then the audrie lard the vaughan. If something is gallican then it does not see the vaughan. If something lard the peggi then the peggi is archducal. If something foray the peggi then it is gallican. If something is archducal then it is not gallican. All archducal things are abortive. If the peggi is dauntless and the peggi is gallican then the peggi does not eat the audrie. If the vaughan verify the peggi then the peggi is dismantled. The nessie does not see the vaughan.", "logic": "\nForay(nessie, peggi)\nArchducal(peggi)\nLard(vaughan, peggi)\nDismantled(audrie)\nforall x (Lard(x, audrie) and Abortive(audrie) -> Lard(audrie, vaughan))\nforall x (Gallican(x) -> not Foray(x, vaughan))\nforall x (Lard(x, peggi) -> Archducal(peggi))\nforall x (Foray(x, peggi) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Archducal(x) -> not Gallican(x))\nforall x (Archducal(x) -> Abortive(x))\nDauntless(peggi) and Gallican(peggi) -> not Lard(peggi, audrie)\nVerify(vaughan, peggi) -> Dismantled(peggi)\n\nnot Foray(nessie, vaughan)\n\nForay(nessie, peggi) and forall x (Foray(x, peggi) -> Gallican(x)) -> therefore Gallican(nessie) Gallican(nessie) and forall x (Gallican(x) -> not Foray(x, vaughan)) -> therefore not Foray(nessie, vaughan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The eloise crush the moll. The moll is steepish. The gunilla preside the moll. The tedda is streaky. If something preside the tedda and the tedda is priapic then the tedda preside the gunilla. If something is unhatched then it does not see the gunilla. If something preside the moll then the moll is steepish. If something crush the moll then it is unhatched. If something is steepish then it is not unhatched. All steepish things are priapic. If the moll is defensible and the moll is unhatched then the moll does not eat the tedda. If the gunilla lapidate the moll then the moll is streaky. The eloise crush the gunilla.", "logic": "\nCrush(eloise, moll)\nSteepish(moll)\nPreside(gunilla, moll)\nStreaky(tedda)\nforall x (Preside(x, tedda) and Priapic(tedda) -> Preside(tedda, gunilla))\nforall x (Unhatched(x) -> not Crush(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Preside(x, moll) -> Steepish(moll))\nforall x (Crush(x, moll) -> Unhatched(x))\nforall x (Steepish(x) -> not Unhatched(x))\nforall x (Steepish(x) -> Priapic(x))\nDefensible(moll) and Unhatched(moll) -> not Preside(moll, tedda)\nLapidate(gunilla, moll) -> Streaky(moll)\n\nCrush(eloise, gunilla)\n\nCrush(eloise, moll) and forall x (Crush(x, moll) -> Unhatched(x)) -> therefore Unhatched(eloise) Unhatched(eloise) and forall x (Unhatched(x) -> not Crush(x, gunilla)) -> therefore not Crush(eloise, gunilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The editha repel the luelle. The luelle is courteous. The johnette jeer the luelle. The susanetta is granulated. If something jeer the susanetta and the susanetta is shameful then the susanetta jeer the johnette. If something is pixilated then it does not see the johnette. If something jeer the luelle then the luelle is courteous. If something repel the luelle then it is pixilated. If something is courteous then it is not pixilated. All courteous things are shameful. If the luelle is alkahestic and the luelle is pixilated then the luelle does not eat the susanetta. If the johnette adore the luelle then the luelle is granulated. The susanetta does not eat the johnette.", "logic": "\nRepel(editha, luelle)\nCourteous(luelle)\nJeer(johnette, luelle)\nGranulated(susanetta)\nforall x (Jeer(x, susanetta) and Shameful(susanetta) -> Jeer(susanetta, johnette))\nforall x (Pixilated(x) -> not Repel(x, johnette))\nforall x (Jeer(x, luelle) -> Courteous(luelle))\nforall x (Repel(x, luelle) -> Pixilated(x))\nforall x (Courteous(x) -> not Pixilated(x))\nforall x (Courteous(x) -> Shameful(x))\nAlkahestic(luelle) and Pixilated(luelle) -> not Jeer(luelle, susanetta)\nAdore(johnette, luelle) -> Granulated(luelle)\n\nnot Jeer(susanetta, johnette)\n\nforall x (Jeer(x, susanetta) and Shameful(susanetta) -> Jeer(susanetta, johnette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The vivian overdose the robb. The robb is godly. The engelbert saint the robb. The rik is vaned. If something saint the rik and the rik is supposable then the rik saint the engelbert. If something is practiced then it does not see the engelbert. If something saint the robb then the robb is godly. If something overdose the robb then it is practiced. If something is godly then it is not practiced. All godly things are supposable. If the robb is uniovulate and the robb is practiced then the robb does not eat the rik. If the engelbert sand the robb then the robb is vaned. The vivian is supposable.", "logic": "\nOverdose(vivian, robb)\nGodly(robb)\nSaint(engelbert, robb)\nVaned(rik)\nforall x (Saint(x, rik) and Supposable(rik) -> Saint(rik, engelbert))\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> not Overdose(x, engelbert))\nforall x (Saint(x, robb) -> Godly(robb))\nforall x (Overdose(x, robb) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Godly(x) -> not Practiced(x))\nforall x (Godly(x) -> Supposable(x))\nUniovulate(robb) and Practiced(robb) -> not Saint(robb, rik)\nSand(engelbert, robb) -> Vaned(robb)\n\nSupposable(vivian)\n\nforall x (Godly(x) -> Supposable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The midge hemstitch the allys. The allys is classified. The pate menace the allys. The laila is apical. If something menace the laila and the laila is unladylike then the laila menace the pate. If something is reddened then it does not see the pate. If something menace the allys then the allys is classified. If something hemstitch the allys then it is reddened. If something is classified then it is not reddened. All classified things are unladylike. If the allys is spoilable and the allys is reddened then the allys does not eat the laila. If the pate dial the allys then the allys is apical. The pate is not unladylike.", "logic": "\nHemstitch(midge, allys)\nClassified(allys)\nMenace(pate, allys)\nApical(laila)\nforall x (Menace(x, laila) and Unladylike(laila) -> Menace(laila, pate))\nforall x (Reddened(x) -> not Hemstitch(x, pate))\nforall x (Menace(x, allys) -> Classified(allys))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, allys) -> Reddened(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) -> not Reddened(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Unladylike(x))\nSpoilable(allys) and Reddened(allys) -> not Menace(allys, laila)\nDial(pate, allys) -> Apical(allys)\n\nnot Unladylike(pate)\n\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Unladylike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The kellsie formulate the gerri. The gerri is ordinary. The theada categorise the gerri. The thom is aecial. If something categorise the thom and the thom is shaggy then the thom categorise the theada. If something is synoptical then it does not see the theada. If something categorise the gerri then the gerri is ordinary. If something formulate the gerri then it is synoptical. If something is ordinary then it is not synoptical. All ordinary things are shaggy. If the gerri is compelling and the gerri is synoptical then the gerri does not eat the thom. If the theada bode the gerri then the gerri is aecial. The kellsie bode the kellsie.", "logic": "\nFormulate(kellsie, gerri)\nOrdinary(gerri)\nCategorise(theada, gerri)\nAecial(thom)\nforall x (Categorise(x, thom) and Shaggy(thom) -> Categorise(thom, theada))\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> not Formulate(x, theada))\nforall x (Categorise(x, gerri) -> Ordinary(gerri))\nforall x (Formulate(x, gerri) -> Synoptical(x))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> not Synoptical(x))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nCompelling(gerri) and Synoptical(gerri) -> not Categorise(gerri, thom)\nBode(theada, gerri) -> Aecial(gerri)\n\nBode(kellsie, kellsie)\n\nBode(kellsie, kellsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The lilias embolden the natty. The natty is brainish. The lawson fraternise the natty. The oren is bush. If something fraternise the oren and the oren is verbatim then the oren fraternise the lawson. If something is tingling then it does not see the lawson. If something fraternise the natty then the natty is brainish. If something embolden the natty then it is tingling. If something is brainish then it is not tingling. All brainish things are verbatim. If the natty is passable and the natty is tingling then the natty does not eat the oren. If the lawson anagram the natty then the natty is bush. The lawson is not brainish.", "logic": "\nEmbolden(lilias, natty)\nBrainish(natty)\nFraternise(lawson, natty)\nBush(oren)\nforall x (Fraternise(x, oren) and Verbatim(oren) -> Fraternise(oren, lawson))\nforall x (Tingling(x) -> not Embolden(x, lawson))\nforall x (Fraternise(x, natty) -> Brainish(natty))\nforall x (Embolden(x, natty) -> Tingling(x))\nforall x (Brainish(x) -> not Tingling(x))\nforall x (Brainish(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nPassable(natty) and Tingling(natty) -> not Fraternise(natty, oren)\nAnagram(lawson, natty) -> Bush(natty)\n\nnot Brainish(lawson)\n\nnot Brainish(lawson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "The alta incinerate the naoma. The naoma is striate. The duffie footle the naoma. The roselyn is french. If something footle the roselyn and the roselyn is clarifying then the roselyn footle the duffie. If something is comparable then it does not see the duffie. If something footle the naoma then the naoma is striate. If something incinerate the naoma then it is comparable. If something is striate then it is not comparable. All striate things are clarifying. If the naoma is socialised and the naoma is comparable then the naoma does not eat the roselyn. If the duffie cicatrize the naoma then the naoma is french. The duffie footle the roselyn.", "logic": "\nIncinerate(alta, naoma)\nStriate(naoma)\nFootle(duffie, naoma)\nFrench(roselyn)\nforall x (Footle(x, roselyn) and Clarifying(roselyn) -> Footle(roselyn, duffie))\nforall x (Comparable(x) -> not Incinerate(x, duffie))\nforall x (Footle(x, naoma) -> Striate(naoma))\nforall x (Incinerate(x, naoma) -> Comparable(x))\nforall x (Striate(x) -> not Comparable(x))\nforall x (Striate(x) -> Clarifying(x))\nSocialised(naoma) and Comparable(naoma) -> not Footle(naoma, roselyn)\nCicatrize(duffie, naoma) -> French(naoma)\n\nFootle(duffie, roselyn)\n\nFootle(duffie, roselyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-874"} {"premises": "Torr is faineant. Torr is unwomanly. Torr is pendent. Torr is heated. Torr is humdrum. Torr is palmate. Torr is unsilenced. Darrel is pendent. Darrel is heated. Darrel is humdrum. Darrel is unsilenced. Sibyl is unwomanly. Sibyl is pendent. Sibyl is heated. Sibyl is humdrum. Sibyl is unsilenced. All unwomanly people are pendent. If someone is unsilenced then they are heated. Kind people are pendent. Rough, unsilenced people are faineant. If Torr is palmate and Torr is pendent then Torr is heated. If someone is faineant then they are palmate. If someone is unsilenced and palmate then they are pendent. All pendent people are palmate. Sibyl is humdrum.", "logic": "\nFaineant(torr)\nUnwomanly(torr)\nPendent(torr)\nHeated(torr)\nHumdrum(torr)\nPalmate(torr)\nUnsilenced(torr)\nPendent(darrel)\nHeated(darrel)\nHumdrum(darrel)\nUnsilenced(darrel)\nUnwomanly(sibyl)\nPendent(sibyl)\nHeated(sibyl)\nHumdrum(sibyl)\nUnsilenced(sibyl)\nforall x (Unwomanly(x) -> Pendent(x))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Heated(x))\nforall x (Humdrum(x) -> Pendent(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) and Unsilenced(x) -> Faineant(x))\nPalmate(torr) and Pendent(torr) -> Heated(torr)\nforall x (Faineant(x) -> Palmate(x))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) and Palmate(x) -> Pendent(x))\nforall x (Pendent(x) -> Palmate(x))\n\nHumdrum(sibyl)\n\ntherefore Humdrum(sibyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-650"} {"premises": "Nicolette is pharisaic. Nicolette is rudderless. Nicolette is implanted. Nicolette is leathery. Nicolette is hexagonal. Nicolette is high. Nicolette is dwindling. Cathi is implanted. Cathi is leathery. Cathi is hexagonal. Cathi is dwindling. Eleanora is rudderless. Eleanora is implanted. Eleanora is leathery. Eleanora is hexagonal. Eleanora is dwindling. All rudderless people are implanted. If someone is dwindling then they are leathery. Kind people are implanted. Rough, dwindling people are pharisaic. If Nicolette is high and Nicolette is implanted then Nicolette is leathery. If someone is pharisaic then they are high. If someone is dwindling and high then they are implanted. All implanted people are high. Cathi is not hexagonal.", "logic": "\nPharisaic(nicolette)\nRudderless(nicolette)\nImplanted(nicolette)\nLeathery(nicolette)\nHexagonal(nicolette)\nHigh(nicolette)\nDwindling(nicolette)\nImplanted(cathi)\nLeathery(cathi)\nHexagonal(cathi)\nDwindling(cathi)\nRudderless(eleanora)\nImplanted(eleanora)\nLeathery(eleanora)\nHexagonal(eleanora)\nDwindling(eleanora)\nforall x (Rudderless(x) -> Implanted(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> Leathery(x))\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) -> Implanted(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Dwindling(x) -> Pharisaic(x))\nHigh(nicolette) and Implanted(nicolette) -> Leathery(nicolette)\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> High(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and High(x) -> Implanted(x))\nforall x (Implanted(x) -> High(x))\n\nnot Hexagonal(cathi)\n\ntherefore Hexagonal(cathi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-650"} {"premises": "Ransom is pastoral. Ransom is diabatic. Ransom is middlemost. Ransom is provident. Ransom is peaked. Ransom is hearty. Ransom is verbalised. Vicky is middlemost. Vicky is provident. Vicky is peaked. Vicky is verbalised. Ashby is diabatic. Ashby is middlemost. Ashby is provident. Ashby is peaked. Ashby is verbalised. All diabatic people are middlemost. If someone is verbalised then they are provident. Kind people are middlemost. Rough, verbalised people are pastoral. If Ransom is hearty and Ransom is middlemost then Ransom is provident. If someone is pastoral then they are hearty. If someone is verbalised and hearty then they are middlemost. All middlemost people are hearty. Vicky is hearty.", "logic": "\nPastoral(ransom)\nDiabatic(ransom)\nMiddlemost(ransom)\nProvident(ransom)\nPeaked(ransom)\nHearty(ransom)\nVerbalised(ransom)\nMiddlemost(vicky)\nProvident(vicky)\nPeaked(vicky)\nVerbalised(vicky)\nDiabatic(ashby)\nMiddlemost(ashby)\nProvident(ashby)\nPeaked(ashby)\nVerbalised(ashby)\nforall x (Diabatic(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Verbalised(x) -> Provident(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Hearty(x) and Verbalised(x) -> Pastoral(x))\nHearty(ransom) and Middlemost(ransom) -> Provident(ransom)\nforall x (Pastoral(x) -> Hearty(x))\nforall x (Verbalised(x) and Hearty(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Hearty(x))\n\nHearty(vicky)\n\nMiddlemost(vicky) and forall x (Middlemost(x) -> Hearty(x)) -> therefore Hearty(vicky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-650"} {"premises": "Gwynne is fused. Gwynne is carboxylic. Gwynne is uncertain. Gwynne is unobserved. Gwynne is deplorable. Gwynne is saudi. Gwynne is direful. Alison is uncertain. Alison is unobserved. Alison is deplorable. Alison is direful. Brody is carboxylic. Brody is uncertain. Brody is unobserved. Brody is deplorable. Brody is direful. All carboxylic people are uncertain. If someone is direful then they are unobserved. Kind people are uncertain. Rough, direful people are fused. If Gwynne is saudi and Gwynne is uncertain then Gwynne is unobserved. If someone is fused then they are saudi. If someone is direful and saudi then they are uncertain. All uncertain people are saudi. Brody is not saudi.", "logic": "\nFused(gwynne)\nCarboxylic(gwynne)\nUncertain(gwynne)\nUnobserved(gwynne)\nDeplorable(gwynne)\nSaudi(gwynne)\nDireful(gwynne)\nUncertain(alison)\nUnobserved(alison)\nDeplorable(alison)\nDireful(alison)\nCarboxylic(brody)\nUncertain(brody)\nUnobserved(brody)\nDeplorable(brody)\nDireful(brody)\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Direful(x) -> Unobserved(x))\nforall x (Deplorable(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Saudi(x) and Direful(x) -> Fused(x))\nSaudi(gwynne) and Uncertain(gwynne) -> Unobserved(gwynne)\nforall x (Fused(x) -> Saudi(x))\nforall x (Direful(x) and Saudi(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Saudi(x))\n\nnot Saudi(brody)\n\nUncertain(brody) and forall x (Uncertain(x) -> Saudi(x)) -> therefore Saudi(brody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-650"} {"premises": "Emalee is united. Emalee is valiant. Emalee is recognised. Emalee is archducal. Emalee is expurgated. Emalee is largish. Emalee is cramped. Amata is recognised. Amata is archducal. Amata is expurgated. Amata is cramped. Jonah is valiant. Jonah is recognised. Jonah is archducal. Jonah is expurgated. Jonah is cramped. All valiant people are recognised. If someone is cramped then they are archducal. Kind people are recognised. Rough, cramped people are united. If Emalee is largish and Emalee is recognised then Emalee is archducal. If someone is united then they are largish. If someone is cramped and largish then they are recognised. All recognised people are largish. Jonah is united.", "logic": "\nUnited(emalee)\nValiant(emalee)\nRecognised(emalee)\nArchducal(emalee)\nExpurgated(emalee)\nLargish(emalee)\nCramped(emalee)\nRecognised(amata)\nArchducal(amata)\nExpurgated(amata)\nCramped(amata)\nValiant(jonah)\nRecognised(jonah)\nArchducal(jonah)\nExpurgated(jonah)\nCramped(jonah)\nforall x (Valiant(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Cramped(x) -> Archducal(x))\nforall x (Expurgated(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Largish(x) and Cramped(x) -> United(x))\nLargish(emalee) and Recognised(emalee) -> Archducal(emalee)\nforall x (United(x) -> Largish(x))\nforall x (Cramped(x) and Largish(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Recognised(x) -> Largish(x))\n\nUnited(jonah)\n\nRecognised(jonah) and forall x (Recognised(x) -> Largish(x)) -> therefore Largish(jonah) Largish(jonah) and Cramped(jonah) and forall x (Largish(x) and Cramped(x) -> United(x)) -> therefore United(jonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-650"} {"premises": "Phillida is basilary. Phillida is bipedal. Phillida is japanese. Phillida is wailing. Phillida is missed. Phillida is palmatifid. Phillida is adulterous. Dulcie is japanese. Dulcie is wailing. Dulcie is missed. Dulcie is adulterous. Lennie is bipedal. Lennie is japanese. Lennie is wailing. Lennie is missed. Lennie is adulterous. All bipedal people are japanese. If someone is adulterous then they are wailing. Kind people are japanese. Rough, adulterous people are basilary. If Phillida is palmatifid and Phillida is japanese then Phillida is wailing. If someone is basilary then they are palmatifid. If someone is adulterous and palmatifid then they are japanese. All japanese people are palmatifid. Lennie is not basilary.", "logic": "\nBasilary(phillida)\nBipedal(phillida)\nJapanese(phillida)\nWailing(phillida)\nMissed(phillida)\nPalmatifid(phillida)\nAdulterous(phillida)\nJapanese(dulcie)\nWailing(dulcie)\nMissed(dulcie)\nAdulterous(dulcie)\nBipedal(lennie)\nJapanese(lennie)\nWailing(lennie)\nMissed(lennie)\nAdulterous(lennie)\nforall x (Bipedal(x) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) -> Wailing(x))\nforall x (Missed(x) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Palmatifid(x) and Adulterous(x) -> Basilary(x))\nPalmatifid(phillida) and Japanese(phillida) -> Wailing(phillida)\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Palmatifid(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) and Palmatifid(x) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> Palmatifid(x))\n\nnot Basilary(lennie)\n\nJapanese(lennie) and forall x (Japanese(x) -> Palmatifid(x)) -> therefore Palmatifid(lennie) Palmatifid(lennie) and Adulterous(lennie) and forall x (Palmatifid(x) and Adulterous(x) -> Basilary(x)) -> therefore Basilary(lennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-650"} {"premises": "Darby is cabalistic. Annaliese is not ergonomic. Annaliese is frumpy. Annaliese is balconied. Annaliese is epicyclic. Annaliese is not cabalistic. Irita is tenderized. Irita is wound. Irita is balconied. Irita is cabalistic. All frumpy, wound people are not ergonomic. If someone is wound then they are frumpy. If someone is epicyclic and not frumpy then they are balconied. If someone is cabalistic and not frumpy then they are epicyclic. If Darby is cabalistic and Darby is not ergonomic then Darby is not tenderized. If Darby is not balconied then Darby is tenderized. Irita is balconied.", "logic": "\nCabalistic(darby)\nnot Ergonomic(annaliese)\nFrumpy(annaliese)\nBalconied(annaliese)\nEpicyclic(annaliese)\nnot Cabalistic(annaliese)\nTenderized(irita)\nWound(irita)\nBalconied(irita)\nCabalistic(irita)\nforall x (Frumpy(x) and Wound(x) -> not Ergonomic(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) and not Frumpy(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) and not Frumpy(x) -> Epicyclic(x))\nCabalistic(darby) and not Ergonomic(darby) -> not Tenderized(darby)\nnot Balconied(darby) -> Tenderized(darby)\n\nBalconied(irita)\n\ntherefore Balconied(irita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Gilburt is unknowable. Oleg is not parental. Oleg is forehanded. Oleg is downlike. Oleg is joking. Oleg is not unknowable. Alida is corruptive. Alida is thick. Alida is downlike. Alida is unknowable. All forehanded, thick people are not parental. If someone is thick then they are forehanded. If someone is joking and not forehanded then they are downlike. If someone is unknowable and not forehanded then they are joking. If Gilburt is unknowable and Gilburt is not parental then Gilburt is not corruptive. If Gilburt is not downlike then Gilburt is corruptive. Oleg is parental.", "logic": "\nUnknowable(gilburt)\nnot Parental(oleg)\nForehanded(oleg)\nDownlike(oleg)\nJoking(oleg)\nnot Unknowable(oleg)\nCorruptive(alida)\nThick(alida)\nDownlike(alida)\nUnknowable(alida)\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Thick(x) -> not Parental(x))\nforall x (Thick(x) -> Forehanded(x))\nforall x (Joking(x) and not Forehanded(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Unknowable(x) and not Forehanded(x) -> Joking(x))\nUnknowable(gilburt) and not Parental(gilburt) -> not Corruptive(gilburt)\nnot Downlike(gilburt) -> Corruptive(gilburt)\n\nParental(oleg)\n\ntherefore not Parental(oleg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Ivonne is numbing. Ethan is not expansive. Ethan is livable. Ethan is airsick. Ethan is rhinal. Ethan is not numbing. Lavinia is pert. Lavinia is knotty. Lavinia is airsick. Lavinia is numbing. All livable, knotty people are not expansive. If someone is knotty then they are livable. If someone is rhinal and not livable then they are airsick. If someone is numbing and not livable then they are rhinal. If Ivonne is numbing and Ivonne is not expansive then Ivonne is not pert. If Ivonne is not airsick then Ivonne is pert. Lavinia is livable.", "logic": "\nNumbing(ivonne)\nnot Expansive(ethan)\nLivable(ethan)\nAirsick(ethan)\nRhinal(ethan)\nnot Numbing(ethan)\nPert(lavinia)\nKnotty(lavinia)\nAirsick(lavinia)\nNumbing(lavinia)\nforall x (Livable(x) and Knotty(x) -> not Expansive(x))\nforall x (Knotty(x) -> Livable(x))\nforall x (Rhinal(x) and not Livable(x) -> Airsick(x))\nforall x (Numbing(x) and not Livable(x) -> Rhinal(x))\nNumbing(ivonne) and not Expansive(ivonne) -> not Pert(ivonne)\nnot Airsick(ivonne) -> Pert(ivonne)\n\nLivable(lavinia)\n\nKnotty(lavinia) and forall x (Knotty(x) -> Livable(x)) -> therefore Livable(lavinia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Muhammad is coexistent. Devora is not prying. Devora is snowbound. Devora is tutorial. Devora is algebraic. Devora is not coexistent. Nerti is chance. Nerti is untapped. Nerti is tutorial. Nerti is coexistent. All snowbound, untapped people are not prying. If someone is untapped then they are snowbound. If someone is algebraic and not snowbound then they are tutorial. If someone is coexistent and not snowbound then they are algebraic. If Muhammad is coexistent and Muhammad is not prying then Muhammad is not chance. If Muhammad is not tutorial then Muhammad is chance. Nerti is not snowbound.", "logic": "\nCoexistent(muhammad)\nnot Prying(devora)\nSnowbound(devora)\nTutorial(devora)\nAlgebraic(devora)\nnot Coexistent(devora)\nChance(nerti)\nUntapped(nerti)\nTutorial(nerti)\nCoexistent(nerti)\nforall x (Snowbound(x) and Untapped(x) -> not Prying(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> Snowbound(x))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) and not Snowbound(x) -> Tutorial(x))\nforall x (Coexistent(x) and not Snowbound(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nCoexistent(muhammad) and not Prying(muhammad) -> not Chance(muhammad)\nnot Tutorial(muhammad) -> Chance(muhammad)\n\nnot Snowbound(nerti)\n\nUntapped(nerti) and forall x (Untapped(x) -> Snowbound(x)) -> therefore Snowbound(nerti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Paulie is petty. Gustavo is not buttoned. Gustavo is stocked. Gustavo is forced. Gustavo is horizontal. Gustavo is not petty. Poppy is indecisive. Poppy is captious. Poppy is forced. Poppy is petty. All stocked, captious people are not buttoned. If someone is captious then they are stocked. If someone is horizontal and not stocked then they are forced. If someone is petty and not stocked then they are horizontal. If Paulie is petty and Paulie is not buttoned then Paulie is not indecisive. If Paulie is not forced then Paulie is indecisive. Poppy is not buttoned.", "logic": "\nPetty(paulie)\nnot Buttoned(gustavo)\nStocked(gustavo)\nForced(gustavo)\nHorizontal(gustavo)\nnot Petty(gustavo)\nIndecisive(poppy)\nCaptious(poppy)\nForced(poppy)\nPetty(poppy)\nforall x (Stocked(x) and Captious(x) -> not Buttoned(x))\nforall x (Captious(x) -> Stocked(x))\nforall x (Horizontal(x) and not Stocked(x) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Petty(x) and not Stocked(x) -> Horizontal(x))\nPetty(paulie) and not Buttoned(paulie) -> not Indecisive(paulie)\nnot Forced(paulie) -> Indecisive(paulie)\n\nnot Buttoned(poppy)\n\nCaptious(poppy) and forall x (Captious(x) -> Stocked(x)) -> therefore Stocked(poppy) Stocked(poppy) and Captious(poppy) and forall x (Stocked(x) and Captious(x) -> not Buttoned(x)) -> therefore not Buttoned(poppy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Francyne is vaulted. Zeke is not lowly. Zeke is peruked. Zeke is effete. Zeke is recyclable. Zeke is not vaulted. Joey is tillable. Joey is patched. Joey is effete. Joey is vaulted. All peruked, patched people are not lowly. If someone is patched then they are peruked. If someone is recyclable and not peruked then they are effete. If someone is vaulted and not peruked then they are recyclable. If Francyne is vaulted and Francyne is not lowly then Francyne is not tillable. If Francyne is not effete then Francyne is tillable. Joey is lowly.", "logic": "\nVaulted(francyne)\nnot Lowly(zeke)\nPeruked(zeke)\nEffete(zeke)\nRecyclable(zeke)\nnot Vaulted(zeke)\nTillable(joey)\nPatched(joey)\nEffete(joey)\nVaulted(joey)\nforall x (Peruked(x) and Patched(x) -> not Lowly(x))\nforall x (Patched(x) -> Peruked(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) and not Peruked(x) -> Effete(x))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) and not Peruked(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nVaulted(francyne) and not Lowly(francyne) -> not Tillable(francyne)\nnot Effete(francyne) -> Tillable(francyne)\n\nLowly(joey)\n\nPatched(joey) and forall x (Patched(x) -> Peruked(x)) -> therefore Peruked(joey) Peruked(joey) and Patched(joey) and forall x (Peruked(x) and Patched(x) -> not Lowly(x)) -> therefore not Lowly(joey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Pansie is arced. Wyndham is not supposed. Wyndham is gaseous. Wyndham is epicarpal. Wyndham is syncarpous. Wyndham is not arced. Rudolfo is circular. Rudolfo is weatherly. Rudolfo is epicarpal. Rudolfo is arced. All gaseous, weatherly people are not supposed. If someone is weatherly then they are gaseous. If someone is syncarpous and not gaseous then they are epicarpal. If someone is arced and not gaseous then they are syncarpous. If Pansie is arced and Pansie is not supposed then Pansie is not circular. If Pansie is not epicarpal then Pansie is circular. Pansie is not gaseous.", "logic": "\nArced(pansie)\nnot Supposed(wyndham)\nGaseous(wyndham)\nEpicarpal(wyndham)\nSyncarpous(wyndham)\nnot Arced(wyndham)\nCircular(rudolfo)\nWeatherly(rudolfo)\nEpicarpal(rudolfo)\nArced(rudolfo)\nforall x (Gaseous(x) and Weatherly(x) -> not Supposed(x))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) -> Gaseous(x))\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) and not Gaseous(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\nforall x (Arced(x) and not Gaseous(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nArced(pansie) and not Supposed(pansie) -> not Circular(pansie)\nnot Epicarpal(pansie) -> Circular(pansie)\n\nnot Gaseous(pansie)\n\nforall x (Weatherly(x) -> Gaseous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Jobye is calyceal. Vena is not unamended. Vena is pursy. Vena is ossified. Vena is unpolluted. Vena is not calyceal. Goddart is pecuniary. Goddart is raftered. Goddart is ossified. Goddart is calyceal. All pursy, raftered people are not unamended. If someone is raftered then they are pursy. If someone is unpolluted and not pursy then they are ossified. If someone is calyceal and not pursy then they are unpolluted. If Jobye is calyceal and Jobye is not unamended then Jobye is not pecuniary. If Jobye is not ossified then Jobye is pecuniary. Goddart is unpolluted.", "logic": "\nCalyceal(jobye)\nnot Unamended(vena)\nPursy(vena)\nOssified(vena)\nUnpolluted(vena)\nnot Calyceal(vena)\nPecuniary(goddart)\nRaftered(goddart)\nOssified(goddart)\nCalyceal(goddart)\nforall x (Pursy(x) and Raftered(x) -> not Unamended(x))\nforall x (Raftered(x) -> Pursy(x))\nforall x (Unpolluted(x) and not Pursy(x) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Calyceal(x) and not Pursy(x) -> Unpolluted(x))\nCalyceal(jobye) and not Unamended(jobye) -> not Pecuniary(jobye)\nnot Ossified(jobye) -> Pecuniary(jobye)\n\nUnpolluted(goddart)\n\nforall x (Calyceal(x) and not Pursy(x) -> Unpolluted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Paige is catalytic. Samuele is not uproarious. Samuele is bellied. Samuele is fledgeless. Samuele is standing. Samuele is not catalytic. Margarita is whacky. Margarita is mirky. Margarita is fledgeless. Margarita is catalytic. All bellied, mirky people are not uproarious. If someone is mirky then they are bellied. If someone is standing and not bellied then they are fledgeless. If someone is catalytic and not bellied then they are standing. If Paige is catalytic and Paige is not uproarious then Paige is not whacky. If Paige is not fledgeless then Paige is whacky. Paige is not standing.", "logic": "\nCatalytic(paige)\nnot Uproarious(samuele)\nBellied(samuele)\nFledgeless(samuele)\nStanding(samuele)\nnot Catalytic(samuele)\nWhacky(margarita)\nMirky(margarita)\nFledgeless(margarita)\nCatalytic(margarita)\nforall x (Bellied(x) and Mirky(x) -> not Uproarious(x))\nforall x (Mirky(x) -> Bellied(x))\nforall x (Standing(x) and not Bellied(x) -> Fledgeless(x))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) and not Bellied(x) -> Standing(x))\nCatalytic(paige) and not Uproarious(paige) -> not Whacky(paige)\nnot Fledgeless(paige) -> Whacky(paige)\n\nnot Standing(paige)\n\nforall x (Catalytic(x) and not Bellied(x) -> Standing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Janith is deviant. Cally is not unpassable. Cally is only. Cally is civilized. Cally is unrelaxed. Cally is not deviant. Aryn is beaming. Aryn is unshelled. Aryn is civilized. Aryn is deviant. All only, unshelled people are not unpassable. If someone is unshelled then they are only. If someone is unrelaxed and not only then they are civilized. If someone is deviant and not only then they are unrelaxed. If Janith is deviant and Janith is not unpassable then Janith is not beaming. If Janith is not civilized then Janith is beaming. Janith is unpassable.", "logic": "\nDeviant(janith)\nnot Unpassable(cally)\nOnly(cally)\nCivilized(cally)\nUnrelaxed(cally)\nnot Deviant(cally)\nBeaming(aryn)\nUnshelled(aryn)\nCivilized(aryn)\nDeviant(aryn)\nforall x (Only(x) and Unshelled(x) -> not Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) -> Only(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) and not Only(x) -> Civilized(x))\nforall x (Deviant(x) and not Only(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nDeviant(janith) and not Unpassable(janith) -> not Beaming(janith)\nnot Civilized(janith) -> Beaming(janith)\n\nUnpassable(janith)\n\nUnpassable(janith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Joyce is propellent. Ruby is not comal. Ruby is concealing. Ruby is revolting. Ruby is verboten. Ruby is not propellent. Hal is dogging. Hal is agential. Hal is revolting. Hal is propellent. All concealing, agential people are not comal. If someone is agential then they are concealing. If someone is verboten and not concealing then they are revolting. If someone is propellent and not concealing then they are verboten. If Joyce is propellent and Joyce is not comal then Joyce is not dogging. If Joyce is not revolting then Joyce is dogging. Joyce is not agential.", "logic": "\nPropellent(joyce)\nnot Comal(ruby)\nConcealing(ruby)\nRevolting(ruby)\nVerboten(ruby)\nnot Propellent(ruby)\nDogging(hal)\nAgential(hal)\nRevolting(hal)\nPropellent(hal)\nforall x (Concealing(x) and Agential(x) -> not Comal(x))\nforall x (Agential(x) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Verboten(x) and not Concealing(x) -> Revolting(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) and not Concealing(x) -> Verboten(x))\nPropellent(joyce) and not Comal(joyce) -> not Dogging(joyce)\nnot Revolting(joyce) -> Dogging(joyce)\n\nnot Agential(joyce)\n\nnot Agential(joyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "Greg is procedural. Louella is not appetising. Louella is jolted. Louella is planktonic. Louella is samoan. Louella is not procedural. Keenan is conventual. Keenan is floccose. Keenan is planktonic. Keenan is procedural. All jolted, floccose people are not appetising. If someone is floccose then they are jolted. If someone is samoan and not jolted then they are planktonic. If someone is procedural and not jolted then they are samoan. If Greg is procedural and Greg is not appetising then Greg is not conventual. If Greg is not planktonic then Greg is conventual. Louella is conventual.", "logic": "\nProcedural(greg)\nnot Appetising(louella)\nJolted(louella)\nPlanktonic(louella)\nSamoan(louella)\nnot Procedural(louella)\nConventual(keenan)\nFloccose(keenan)\nPlanktonic(keenan)\nProcedural(keenan)\nforall x (Jolted(x) and Floccose(x) -> not Appetising(x))\nforall x (Floccose(x) -> Jolted(x))\nforall x (Samoan(x) and not Jolted(x) -> Planktonic(x))\nforall x (Procedural(x) and not Jolted(x) -> Samoan(x))\nProcedural(greg) and not Appetising(greg) -> not Conventual(greg)\nnot Planktonic(greg) -> Conventual(greg)\n\nConventual(louella)\n\nConventual(louella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The aldus is improbable. The aldus groin the maible. The maible reclassify the aldus. The maible is nicaraguan. The maible is not improbable. The maible is not disjointed. The maible groin the aldus. If something groin the maible then it is engorged. If something bullshit the aldus and it is engorged then the aldus is fond. If something is improbable then it bullshit the aldus. If something bullshit the aldus and it bullshit the maible then the maible is improbable. If something groin the maible then the maible reclassify the aldus. If something bullshit the aldus then it is improbable. If something bullshit the aldus and it is not disjointed then the aldus is improbable. If something groin the maible and the maible bullshit the aldus then the aldus groin the maible. The maible is not improbable.", "logic": "\nImprobable(aldus)\nGroin(aldus, maible)\nReclassify(maible, aldus)\nNicaraguan(maible)\nnot Improbable(maible)\nnot Disjointed(maible)\nGroin(maible, aldus)\nforall x (Groin(x, maible) -> Engorged(x))\nforall x (Bullshit(x, aldus) and Engorged(x) -> Fond(aldus))\nforall x (Improbable(x) -> Bullshit(x, aldus))\nforall x (Bullshit(x, aldus) and Bullshit(x, maible) -> Improbable(maible))\nforall x (Groin(x, maible) -> Reclassify(maible, aldus))\nforall x (Bullshit(x, aldus) -> Improbable(x))\nforall x (Bullshit(x, aldus) and not Disjointed(x) -> Improbable(aldus))\nforall x (Groin(x, maible) and Bullshit(maible, aldus) -> Groin(aldus, maible))\n\nnot Improbable(maible)\n\ntherefore not Improbable(maible)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The roxane is pernicious. The roxane brutalize the jane. The jane accrete the roxane. The jane is cadent. The jane is not pernicious. The jane is not bossy. The jane brutalize the roxane. If something brutalize the jane then it is imbricate. If something bard the roxane and it is imbricate then the roxane is chagrined. If something is pernicious then it bard the roxane. If something bard the roxane and it bard the jane then the jane is pernicious. If something brutalize the jane then the jane accrete the roxane. If something bard the roxane then it is pernicious. If something bard the roxane and it is not bossy then the roxane is pernicious. If something brutalize the jane and the jane bard the roxane then the roxane brutalize the jane. The jane does not visit the roxane.", "logic": "\nPernicious(roxane)\nBrutalize(roxane, jane)\nAccrete(jane, roxane)\nCadent(jane)\nnot Pernicious(jane)\nnot Bossy(jane)\nBrutalize(jane, roxane)\nforall x (Brutalize(x, jane) -> Imbricate(x))\nforall x (Bard(x, roxane) and Imbricate(x) -> Chagrined(roxane))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) -> Bard(x, roxane))\nforall x (Bard(x, roxane) and Bard(x, jane) -> Pernicious(jane))\nforall x (Brutalize(x, jane) -> Accrete(jane, roxane))\nforall x (Bard(x, roxane) -> Pernicious(x))\nforall x (Bard(x, roxane) and not Bossy(x) -> Pernicious(roxane))\nforall x (Brutalize(x, jane) and Bard(jane, roxane) -> Brutalize(roxane, jane))\n\nnot Brutalize(jane, roxane)\n\ntherefore Brutalize(jane, roxane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The roselia is satiable. The roselia outstay the jinny. The jinny finance the roselia. The jinny is titanic. The jinny is not satiable. The jinny is not christlike. The jinny outstay the roselia. If something outstay the jinny then it is paradisaic. If something swagger the roselia and it is paradisaic then the roselia is percipient. If something is satiable then it swagger the roselia. If something swagger the roselia and it swagger the jinny then the jinny is satiable. If something outstay the jinny then the jinny finance the roselia. If something swagger the roselia then it is satiable. If something swagger the roselia and it is not christlike then the roselia is satiable. If something outstay the jinny and the jinny swagger the roselia then the roselia outstay the jinny. The roselia swagger the roselia.", "logic": "\nSatiable(roselia)\nOutstay(roselia, jinny)\nFinance(jinny, roselia)\nTitanic(jinny)\nnot Satiable(jinny)\nnot Christlike(jinny)\nOutstay(jinny, roselia)\nforall x (Outstay(x, jinny) -> Paradisaic(x))\nforall x (Swagger(x, roselia) and Paradisaic(x) -> Percipient(roselia))\nforall x (Satiable(x) -> Swagger(x, roselia))\nforall x (Swagger(x, roselia) and Swagger(x, jinny) -> Satiable(jinny))\nforall x (Outstay(x, jinny) -> Finance(jinny, roselia))\nforall x (Swagger(x, roselia) -> Satiable(x))\nforall x (Swagger(x, roselia) and not Christlike(x) -> Satiable(roselia))\nforall x (Outstay(x, jinny) and Swagger(jinny, roselia) -> Outstay(roselia, jinny))\n\nSwagger(roselia, roselia)\n\nSatiable(roselia) and forall x (Satiable(x) -> Swagger(x, roselia)) -> therefore Swagger(roselia, roselia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The perrine is weird. The perrine thrash the claribel. The claribel slop the perrine. The claribel is crumpled. The claribel is not weird. The claribel is not existing. The claribel thrash the perrine. If something thrash the claribel then it is posterior. If something undock the perrine and it is posterior then the perrine is chichi. If something is weird then it undock the perrine. If something undock the perrine and it undock the claribel then the claribel is weird. If something thrash the claribel then the claribel slop the perrine. If something undock the perrine then it is weird. If something undock the perrine and it is not existing then the perrine is weird. If something thrash the claribel and the claribel undock the perrine then the perrine thrash the claribel. The perrine is not posterior.", "logic": "\nWeird(perrine)\nThrash(perrine, claribel)\nSlop(claribel, perrine)\nCrumpled(claribel)\nnot Weird(claribel)\nnot Existing(claribel)\nThrash(claribel, perrine)\nforall x (Thrash(x, claribel) -> Posterior(x))\nforall x (Undock(x, perrine) and Posterior(x) -> Chichi(perrine))\nforall x (Weird(x) -> Undock(x, perrine))\nforall x (Undock(x, perrine) and Undock(x, claribel) -> Weird(claribel))\nforall x (Thrash(x, claribel) -> Slop(claribel, perrine))\nforall x (Undock(x, perrine) -> Weird(x))\nforall x (Undock(x, perrine) and not Existing(x) -> Weird(perrine))\nforall x (Thrash(x, claribel) and Undock(claribel, perrine) -> Thrash(perrine, claribel))\n\nnot Posterior(perrine)\n\nThrash(perrine, claribel) and forall x (Thrash(x, claribel) -> Posterior(x)) -> therefore Posterior(perrine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The coriss is somnific. The coriss conceal the meara. The meara approve the coriss. The meara is tinselly. The meara is not somnific. The meara is not slumberous. The meara conceal the coriss. If something conceal the meara then it is broody. If something breach the coriss and it is broody then the coriss is smooth. If something is somnific then it breach the coriss. If something breach the coriss and it breach the meara then the meara is somnific. If something conceal the meara then the meara approve the coriss. If something breach the coriss then it is somnific. If something breach the coriss and it is not slumberous then the coriss is somnific. If something conceal the meara and the meara breach the coriss then the coriss conceal the meara. The coriss is smooth.", "logic": "\nSomnific(coriss)\nConceal(coriss, meara)\nApprove(meara, coriss)\nTinselly(meara)\nnot Somnific(meara)\nnot Slumberous(meara)\nConceal(meara, coriss)\nforall x (Conceal(x, meara) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Breach(x, coriss) and Broody(x) -> Smooth(coriss))\nforall x (Somnific(x) -> Breach(x, coriss))\nforall x (Breach(x, coriss) and Breach(x, meara) -> Somnific(meara))\nforall x (Conceal(x, meara) -> Approve(meara, coriss))\nforall x (Breach(x, coriss) -> Somnific(x))\nforall x (Breach(x, coriss) and not Slumberous(x) -> Somnific(coriss))\nforall x (Conceal(x, meara) and Breach(meara, coriss) -> Conceal(coriss, meara))\n\nSmooth(coriss)\n\nSomnific(coriss) and forall x (Somnific(x) -> Breach(x, coriss)) -> therefore Breach(coriss, coriss) Conceal(coriss, meara) and forall x (Conceal(x, meara) -> Broody(x)) -> therefore Broody(coriss) Breach(coriss, coriss) and Broody(coriss) and forall x (Breach(x, coriss) and Broody(x) -> Smooth(coriss)) -> therefore Smooth(coriss)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The dierdre is moony. The dierdre sport the cathleen. The cathleen cinematise the dierdre. The cathleen is needled. The cathleen is not moony. The cathleen is not unrelated. The cathleen sport the dierdre. If something sport the cathleen then it is antitumour. If something gravitate the dierdre and it is antitumour then the dierdre is twin. If something is moony then it gravitate the dierdre. If something gravitate the dierdre and it gravitate the cathleen then the cathleen is moony. If something sport the cathleen then the cathleen cinematise the dierdre. If something gravitate the dierdre then it is moony. If something gravitate the dierdre and it is not unrelated then the dierdre is moony. If something sport the cathleen and the cathleen gravitate the dierdre then the dierdre sport the cathleen. The dierdre is not twin.", "logic": "\nMoony(dierdre)\nSport(dierdre, cathleen)\nCinematise(cathleen, dierdre)\nNeedled(cathleen)\nnot Moony(cathleen)\nnot Unrelated(cathleen)\nSport(cathleen, dierdre)\nforall x (Sport(x, cathleen) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, dierdre) and Antitumour(x) -> Twin(dierdre))\nforall x (Moony(x) -> Gravitate(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, dierdre) and Gravitate(x, cathleen) -> Moony(cathleen))\nforall x (Sport(x, cathleen) -> Cinematise(cathleen, dierdre))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, dierdre) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, dierdre) and not Unrelated(x) -> Moony(dierdre))\nforall x (Sport(x, cathleen) and Gravitate(cathleen, dierdre) -> Sport(dierdre, cathleen))\n\nnot Twin(dierdre)\n\nMoony(dierdre) and forall x (Moony(x) -> Gravitate(x, dierdre)) -> therefore Gravitate(dierdre, dierdre) Sport(dierdre, cathleen) and forall x (Sport(x, cathleen) -> Antitumour(x)) -> therefore Antitumour(dierdre) Gravitate(dierdre, dierdre) and Antitumour(dierdre) and forall x (Gravitate(x, dierdre) and Antitumour(x) -> Twin(dierdre)) -> therefore Twin(dierdre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The karlyn is decorous. The karlyn philander the ignace. The ignace outwit the karlyn. The ignace is renowned. The ignace is not decorous. The ignace is not unpainted. The ignace philander the karlyn. If something philander the ignace then it is stubbled. If something fume the karlyn and it is stubbled then the karlyn is variolar. If something is decorous then it fume the karlyn. If something fume the karlyn and it fume the ignace then the ignace is decorous. If something philander the ignace then the ignace outwit the karlyn. If something fume the karlyn then it is decorous. If something fume the karlyn and it is not unpainted then the karlyn is decorous. If something philander the ignace and the ignace fume the karlyn then the karlyn philander the ignace. The ignace is not stubbled.", "logic": "\nDecorous(karlyn)\nPhilander(karlyn, ignace)\nOutwit(ignace, karlyn)\nRenowned(ignace)\nnot Decorous(ignace)\nnot Unpainted(ignace)\nPhilander(ignace, karlyn)\nforall x (Philander(x, ignace) -> Stubbled(x))\nforall x (Fume(x, karlyn) and Stubbled(x) -> Variolar(karlyn))\nforall x (Decorous(x) -> Fume(x, karlyn))\nforall x (Fume(x, karlyn) and Fume(x, ignace) -> Decorous(ignace))\nforall x (Philander(x, ignace) -> Outwit(ignace, karlyn))\nforall x (Fume(x, karlyn) -> Decorous(x))\nforall x (Fume(x, karlyn) and not Unpainted(x) -> Decorous(karlyn))\nforall x (Philander(x, ignace) and Fume(ignace, karlyn) -> Philander(karlyn, ignace))\n\nnot Stubbled(ignace)\n\nforall x (Philander(x, ignace) -> Stubbled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The rheba is glorified. The rheba respond the emylee. The emylee estimate the rheba. The emylee is apocarpous. The emylee is not glorified. The emylee is not nontoxic. The emylee respond the rheba. If something respond the emylee then it is sodden. If something steamroll the rheba and it is sodden then the rheba is olden. If something is glorified then it steamroll the rheba. If something steamroll the rheba and it steamroll the emylee then the emylee is glorified. If something respond the emylee then the emylee estimate the rheba. If something steamroll the rheba then it is glorified. If something steamroll the rheba and it is not nontoxic then the rheba is glorified. If something respond the emylee and the emylee steamroll the rheba then the rheba respond the emylee. The emylee steamroll the rheba.", "logic": "\nGlorified(rheba)\nRespond(rheba, emylee)\nEstimate(emylee, rheba)\nApocarpous(emylee)\nnot Glorified(emylee)\nnot Nontoxic(emylee)\nRespond(emylee, rheba)\nforall x (Respond(x, emylee) -> Sodden(x))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, rheba) and Sodden(x) -> Olden(rheba))\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Steamroll(x, rheba))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, rheba) and Steamroll(x, emylee) -> Glorified(emylee))\nforall x (Respond(x, emylee) -> Estimate(emylee, rheba))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, rheba) -> Glorified(x))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, rheba) and not Nontoxic(x) -> Glorified(rheba))\nforall x (Respond(x, emylee) and Steamroll(emylee, rheba) -> Respond(rheba, emylee))\n\nSteamroll(emylee, rheba)\n\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Steamroll(x, rheba)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The mella is muscular. The mella raze the jehanna. The jehanna polemicise the mella. The jehanna is naif. The jehanna is not muscular. The jehanna is not gummy. The jehanna raze the mella. If something raze the jehanna then it is echoic. If something inspissate the mella and it is echoic then the mella is unengaged. If something is muscular then it inspissate the mella. If something inspissate the mella and it inspissate the jehanna then the jehanna is muscular. If something raze the jehanna then the jehanna polemicise the mella. If something inspissate the mella then it is muscular. If something inspissate the mella and it is not gummy then the mella is muscular. If something raze the jehanna and the jehanna inspissate the mella then the mella raze the jehanna. The jehanna does not chase the jehanna.", "logic": "\nMuscular(mella)\nRaze(mella, jehanna)\nPolemicise(jehanna, mella)\nNaif(jehanna)\nnot Muscular(jehanna)\nnot Gummy(jehanna)\nRaze(jehanna, mella)\nforall x (Raze(x, jehanna) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, mella) and Echoic(x) -> Unengaged(mella))\nforall x (Muscular(x) -> Inspissate(x, mella))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, mella) and Inspissate(x, jehanna) -> Muscular(jehanna))\nforall x (Raze(x, jehanna) -> Polemicise(jehanna, mella))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, mella) -> Muscular(x))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, mella) and not Gummy(x) -> Muscular(mella))\nforall x (Raze(x, jehanna) and Inspissate(jehanna, mella) -> Raze(mella, jehanna))\n\nnot Inspissate(jehanna, jehanna)\n\nnot Inspissate(jehanna, jehanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The penn is lienal. The penn attribute the giles. The giles slaver the penn. The giles is vulgar. The giles is not lienal. The giles is not scalelike. The giles attribute the penn. If something attribute the giles then it is monovular. If something drudge the penn and it is monovular then the penn is arced. If something is lienal then it drudge the penn. If something drudge the penn and it drudge the giles then the giles is lienal. If something attribute the giles then the giles slaver the penn. If something drudge the penn then it is lienal. If something drudge the penn and it is not scalelike then the penn is lienal. If something attribute the giles and the giles drudge the penn then the penn attribute the giles. The giles is arced.", "logic": "\nLienal(penn)\nAttribute(penn, giles)\nSlaver(giles, penn)\nVulgar(giles)\nnot Lienal(giles)\nnot Scalelike(giles)\nAttribute(giles, penn)\nforall x (Attribute(x, giles) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Drudge(x, penn) and Monovular(x) -> Arced(penn))\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> Drudge(x, penn))\nforall x (Drudge(x, penn) and Drudge(x, giles) -> Lienal(giles))\nforall x (Attribute(x, giles) -> Slaver(giles, penn))\nforall x (Drudge(x, penn) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Drudge(x, penn) and not Scalelike(x) -> Lienal(penn))\nforall x (Attribute(x, giles) and Drudge(giles, penn) -> Attribute(penn, giles))\n\nArced(giles)\n\nArced(giles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The welbie is anorexic. The welbie croquet the josefa. The josefa disport the welbie. The josefa is idealistic. The josefa is not anorexic. The josefa is not disquieted. The josefa croquet the welbie. If something croquet the josefa then it is umteenth. If something tyrannise the welbie and it is umteenth then the welbie is billowing. If something is anorexic then it tyrannise the welbie. If something tyrannise the welbie and it tyrannise the josefa then the josefa is anorexic. If something croquet the josefa then the josefa disport the welbie. If something tyrannise the welbie then it is anorexic. If something tyrannise the welbie and it is not disquieted then the welbie is anorexic. If something croquet the josefa and the josefa tyrannise the welbie then the welbie croquet the josefa. The josefa does not visit the josefa.", "logic": "\nAnorexic(welbie)\nCroquet(welbie, josefa)\nDisport(josefa, welbie)\nIdealistic(josefa)\nnot Anorexic(josefa)\nnot Disquieted(josefa)\nCroquet(josefa, welbie)\nforall x (Croquet(x, josefa) -> Umteenth(x))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, welbie) and Umteenth(x) -> Billowing(welbie))\nforall x (Anorexic(x) -> Tyrannise(x, welbie))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, welbie) and Tyrannise(x, josefa) -> Anorexic(josefa))\nforall x (Croquet(x, josefa) -> Disport(josefa, welbie))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, welbie) -> Anorexic(x))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, welbie) and not Disquieted(x) -> Anorexic(welbie))\nforall x (Croquet(x, josefa) and Tyrannise(josefa, welbie) -> Croquet(welbie, josefa))\n\nnot Croquet(josefa, josefa)\n\nnot Croquet(josefa, josefa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The hoyt is concessive. The hoyt bewray the bertina. The bertina acquiesce the hoyt. The bertina is acoustical. The bertina is not concessive. The bertina is not pouchlike. The bertina bewray the hoyt. If something bewray the bertina then it is arcuate. If something watercolor the hoyt and it is arcuate then the hoyt is corporal. If something is concessive then it watercolor the hoyt. If something watercolor the hoyt and it watercolor the bertina then the bertina is concessive. If something bewray the bertina then the bertina acquiesce the hoyt. If something watercolor the hoyt then it is concessive. If something watercolor the hoyt and it is not pouchlike then the hoyt is concessive. If something bewray the bertina and the bertina watercolor the hoyt then the hoyt bewray the bertina. The hoyt is pouchlike.", "logic": "\nConcessive(hoyt)\nBewray(hoyt, bertina)\nAcquiesce(bertina, hoyt)\nAcoustical(bertina)\nnot Concessive(bertina)\nnot Pouchlike(bertina)\nBewray(bertina, hoyt)\nforall x (Bewray(x, bertina) -> Arcuate(x))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, hoyt) and Arcuate(x) -> Corporal(hoyt))\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> Watercolor(x, hoyt))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, hoyt) and Watercolor(x, bertina) -> Concessive(bertina))\nforall x (Bewray(x, bertina) -> Acquiesce(bertina, hoyt))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, hoyt) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, hoyt) and not Pouchlike(x) -> Concessive(hoyt))\nforall x (Bewray(x, bertina) and Watercolor(bertina, hoyt) -> Bewray(hoyt, bertina))\n\nPouchlike(hoyt)\n\nPouchlike(hoyt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1092"} {"premises": "The arlyn is cxlv. The arlyn is topologic. The arlyn farce the carmina. The carmina stoke the barde. The aditya stoke the carmina. The barde is topologic. The barde is wedged. If someone relativise the aditya then they see the barde. If someone is topologic and they chase the aditya then they chase the arlyn. If someone stoke the carmina then the carmina relativise the aditya. The carmina stoke the barde.", "logic": "\nCxlv(arlyn)\nTopologic(arlyn)\nFarce(arlyn, carmina)\nStoke(carmina, barde)\nStoke(aditya, carmina)\nTopologic(barde)\nWedged(barde)\nforall x (Relativise(x, aditya) -> Farce(x, barde))\nforall x (Topologic(x) and Stoke(x, aditya) -> Stoke(x, arlyn))\nforall x (Stoke(x, carmina) -> Relativise(carmina, aditya))\n\nStoke(carmina, barde)\n\ntherefore Stoke(carmina, barde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The corry is uncurbed. The corry is fearless. The corry nurse the stewart. The stewart hedge the howie. The kent hedge the stewart. The howie is fearless. The howie is filipino. If someone sporulate the kent then they see the howie. If someone is fearless and they chase the kent then they chase the corry. If someone hedge the stewart then the stewart sporulate the kent. The corry is not uncurbed.", "logic": "\nUncurbed(corry)\nFearless(corry)\nNurse(corry, stewart)\nHedge(stewart, howie)\nHedge(kent, stewart)\nFearless(howie)\nFilipino(howie)\nforall x (Sporulate(x, kent) -> Nurse(x, howie))\nforall x (Fearless(x) and Hedge(x, kent) -> Hedge(x, corry))\nforall x (Hedge(x, stewart) -> Sporulate(stewart, kent))\n\nnot Uncurbed(corry)\n\ntherefore Uncurbed(corry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The adi is centigrade. The adi is impeccant. The adi cartwheel the hattie. The hattie blether the vernice. The charita blether the hattie. The vernice is impeccant. The vernice is crying. If someone macadamize the charita then they see the vernice. If someone is impeccant and they chase the charita then they chase the adi. If someone blether the hattie then the hattie macadamize the charita. The hattie macadamize the charita.", "logic": "\nCentigrade(adi)\nImpeccant(adi)\nCartwheel(adi, hattie)\nBlether(hattie, vernice)\nBlether(charita, hattie)\nImpeccant(vernice)\nCrying(vernice)\nforall x (Macadamize(x, charita) -> Cartwheel(x, vernice))\nforall x (Impeccant(x) and Blether(x, charita) -> Blether(x, adi))\nforall x (Blether(x, hattie) -> Macadamize(hattie, charita))\n\nMacadamize(hattie, charita)\n\nBlether(charita, hattie) and forall x (Blether(x, hattie) -> Macadamize(hattie, charita)) -> therefore Macadamize(hattie, charita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The maxy is hypnoid. The maxy is befouled. The maxy impair the valentia. The valentia mongrelize the sarene. The hermia mongrelize the valentia. The sarene is befouled. The sarene is boozy. If someone pedicure the hermia then they see the sarene. If someone is befouled and they chase the hermia then they chase the maxy. If someone mongrelize the valentia then the valentia pedicure the hermia. The valentia does not eat the hermia.", "logic": "\nHypnoid(maxy)\nBefouled(maxy)\nImpair(maxy, valentia)\nMongrelize(valentia, sarene)\nMongrelize(hermia, valentia)\nBefouled(sarene)\nBoozy(sarene)\nforall x (Pedicure(x, hermia) -> Impair(x, sarene))\nforall x (Befouled(x) and Mongrelize(x, hermia) -> Mongrelize(x, maxy))\nforall x (Mongrelize(x, valentia) -> Pedicure(valentia, hermia))\n\nnot Pedicure(valentia, hermia)\n\nMongrelize(hermia, valentia) and forall x (Mongrelize(x, valentia) -> Pedicure(valentia, hermia)) -> therefore Pedicure(valentia, hermia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The caren is foliated. The caren is stenotic. The caren plume the idalina. The idalina terrify the jimmie. The paton terrify the idalina. The jimmie is stenotic. The jimmie is throbbing. If someone skreigh the paton then they see the jimmie. If someone is stenotic and they chase the paton then they chase the caren. If someone terrify the idalina then the idalina skreigh the paton. The idalina plume the jimmie.", "logic": "\nFoliated(caren)\nStenotic(caren)\nPlume(caren, idalina)\nTerrify(idalina, jimmie)\nTerrify(paton, idalina)\nStenotic(jimmie)\nThrobbing(jimmie)\nforall x (Skreigh(x, paton) -> Plume(x, jimmie))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and Terrify(x, paton) -> Terrify(x, caren))\nforall x (Terrify(x, idalina) -> Skreigh(idalina, paton))\n\nPlume(idalina, jimmie)\n\nTerrify(paton, idalina) and forall x (Terrify(x, idalina) -> Skreigh(idalina, paton)) -> therefore Skreigh(idalina, paton) Skreigh(idalina, paton) and forall x (Skreigh(x, paton) -> Plume(x, jimmie)) -> therefore Plume(idalina, jimmie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The abdul is intuitive. The abdul is airworthy. The abdul please the marisa. The marisa catechise the melvyn. The tiffany catechise the marisa. The melvyn is airworthy. The melvyn is maximal. If someone terrorize the tiffany then they see the melvyn. If someone is airworthy and they chase the tiffany then they chase the abdul. If someone catechise the marisa then the marisa terrorize the tiffany. The marisa does not see the melvyn.", "logic": "\nIntuitive(abdul)\nAirworthy(abdul)\nPlease(abdul, marisa)\nCatechise(marisa, melvyn)\nCatechise(tiffany, marisa)\nAirworthy(melvyn)\nMaximal(melvyn)\nforall x (Terrorize(x, tiffany) -> Please(x, melvyn))\nforall x (Airworthy(x) and Catechise(x, tiffany) -> Catechise(x, abdul))\nforall x (Catechise(x, marisa) -> Terrorize(marisa, tiffany))\n\nnot Please(marisa, melvyn)\n\nCatechise(tiffany, marisa) and forall x (Catechise(x, marisa) -> Terrorize(marisa, tiffany)) -> therefore Terrorize(marisa, tiffany) Terrorize(marisa, tiffany) and forall x (Terrorize(x, tiffany) -> Please(x, melvyn)) -> therefore Please(marisa, melvyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The vincents is unbrushed. The vincents is tetragonal. The vincents dragoon the stewart. The stewart tittivate the lelia. The blanche tittivate the stewart. The lelia is tetragonal. The lelia is despondent. If someone skank the blanche then they see the lelia. If someone is tetragonal and they chase the blanche then they chase the vincents. If someone tittivate the stewart then the stewart skank the blanche. The vincents does not see the lelia.", "logic": "\nUnbrushed(vincents)\nTetragonal(vincents)\nDragoon(vincents, stewart)\nTittivate(stewart, lelia)\nTittivate(blanche, stewart)\nTetragonal(lelia)\nDespondent(lelia)\nforall x (Skank(x, blanche) -> Dragoon(x, lelia))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and Tittivate(x, blanche) -> Tittivate(x, vincents))\nforall x (Tittivate(x, stewart) -> Skank(stewart, blanche))\n\nnot Dragoon(vincents, lelia)\n\nforall x (Skank(x, blanche) -> Dragoon(x, lelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The thor is pinnatifid. The thor is dipped. The thor regroup the kelcey. The kelcey cowl the joelle. The tera cowl the kelcey. The joelle is dipped. The joelle is unsnarled. If someone style the tera then they see the joelle. If someone is dipped and they chase the tera then they chase the thor. If someone cowl the kelcey then the kelcey style the tera. The thor cowl the thor.", "logic": "\nPinnatifid(thor)\nDipped(thor)\nRegroup(thor, kelcey)\nCowl(kelcey, joelle)\nCowl(tera, kelcey)\nDipped(joelle)\nUnsnarled(joelle)\nforall x (Style(x, tera) -> Regroup(x, joelle))\nforall x (Dipped(x) and Cowl(x, tera) -> Cowl(x, thor))\nforall x (Cowl(x, kelcey) -> Style(kelcey, tera))\n\nCowl(thor, thor)\n\nforall x (Dipped(x) and Cowl(x, tera) -> Cowl(x, thor)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The lebbie is untangled. The lebbie is bracteal. The lebbie bruise the felicity. The felicity elevate the lazlo. The darcie elevate the felicity. The lazlo is bracteal. The lazlo is titillated. If someone chaw the darcie then they see the lazlo. If someone is bracteal and they chase the darcie then they chase the lebbie. If someone elevate the felicity then the felicity chaw the darcie. The darcie does not see the lazlo.", "logic": "\nUntangled(lebbie)\nBracteal(lebbie)\nBruise(lebbie, felicity)\nElevate(felicity, lazlo)\nElevate(darcie, felicity)\nBracteal(lazlo)\nTitillated(lazlo)\nforall x (Chaw(x, darcie) -> Bruise(x, lazlo))\nforall x (Bracteal(x) and Elevate(x, darcie) -> Elevate(x, lebbie))\nforall x (Elevate(x, felicity) -> Chaw(felicity, darcie))\n\nnot Bruise(darcie, lazlo)\n\nforall x (Chaw(x, darcie) -> Bruise(x, lazlo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The sybilla is finicky. The sybilla is obligate. The sybilla lysogenize the marta. The marta carburet the ramonda. The rollin carburet the marta. The ramonda is obligate. The ramonda is unbooked. If someone suppress the rollin then they see the ramonda. If someone is obligate and they chase the rollin then they chase the sybilla. If someone carburet the marta then the marta suppress the rollin. The marta suppress the marta.", "logic": "\nFinicky(sybilla)\nObligate(sybilla)\nLysogenize(sybilla, marta)\nCarburet(marta, ramonda)\nCarburet(rollin, marta)\nObligate(ramonda)\nUnbooked(ramonda)\nforall x (Suppress(x, rollin) -> Lysogenize(x, ramonda))\nforall x (Obligate(x) and Carburet(x, rollin) -> Carburet(x, sybilla))\nforall x (Carburet(x, marta) -> Suppress(marta, rollin))\n\nSuppress(marta, marta)\n\nSuppress(marta, marta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The emiline is chalky. The emiline is glum. The emiline modernize the mart. The mart phonate the sergei. The crawford phonate the mart. The sergei is glum. The sergei is loutish. If someone disarm the crawford then they see the sergei. If someone is glum and they chase the crawford then they chase the emiline. If someone phonate the mart then the mart disarm the crawford. The emiline does not eat the crawford.", "logic": "\nChalky(emiline)\nGlum(emiline)\nModernize(emiline, mart)\nPhonate(mart, sergei)\nPhonate(crawford, mart)\nGlum(sergei)\nLoutish(sergei)\nforall x (Disarm(x, crawford) -> Modernize(x, sergei))\nforall x (Glum(x) and Phonate(x, crawford) -> Phonate(x, emiline))\nforall x (Phonate(x, mart) -> Disarm(mart, crawford))\n\nnot Disarm(emiline, crawford)\n\nnot Disarm(emiline, crawford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "The sibylle is neuralgic. The sibylle is cespitose. The sibylle safeguard the filip. The filip deodorise the edgar. The mirna deodorise the filip. The edgar is cespitose. The edgar is inexplicit. If someone reread the mirna then they see the edgar. If someone is cespitose and they chase the mirna then they chase the sibylle. If someone deodorise the filip then the filip reread the mirna. The mirna reread the filip.", "logic": "\nNeuralgic(sibylle)\nCespitose(sibylle)\nSafeguard(sibylle, filip)\nDeodorise(filip, edgar)\nDeodorise(mirna, filip)\nCespitose(edgar)\nInexplicit(edgar)\nforall x (Reread(x, mirna) -> Safeguard(x, edgar))\nforall x (Cespitose(x) and Deodorise(x, mirna) -> Deodorise(x, sibylle))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, filip) -> Reread(filip, mirna))\n\nReread(mirna, filip)\n\nReread(mirna, filip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1177"} {"premises": "Faydra is dopy. Faydra is cheesy. Rayna is siberian. Rayna is dopy. Rayna is prosodic. Ruddie is dopy. Ruddie is dressy. All dopy people are solved. If someone is solved then they are siberian. If Ruddie is dopy then Ruddie is solved. Faydra is dopy.", "logic": "\nDopy(faydra)\nCheesy(faydra)\nSiberian(rayna)\nDopy(rayna)\nProsodic(rayna)\nDopy(ruddie)\nDressy(ruddie)\nforall x (Dopy(x) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Solved(x) -> Siberian(x))\nDopy(ruddie) -> Solved(ruddie)\n\nDopy(faydra)\n\ntherefore Dopy(faydra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Aveline is babylonian. Aveline is monestrous. Aharon is anemic. Aharon is babylonian. Aharon is winey. Marya is babylonian. Marya is inland. All babylonian people are drumhead. If someone is drumhead then they are anemic. If Marya is babylonian then Marya is drumhead. Aharon is not babylonian.", "logic": "\nBabylonian(aveline)\nMonestrous(aveline)\nAnemic(aharon)\nBabylonian(aharon)\nWiney(aharon)\nBabylonian(marya)\nInland(marya)\nforall x (Babylonian(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) -> Anemic(x))\nBabylonian(marya) -> Drumhead(marya)\n\nnot Babylonian(aharon)\n\ntherefore Babylonian(aharon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Merlin is haunting. Merlin is coseismal. Garret is sourish. Garret is haunting. Garret is lanceolate. Renado is haunting. Renado is bombastic. All haunting people are unsown. If someone is unsown then they are sourish. If Renado is haunting then Renado is unsown. Garret is unsown.", "logic": "\nHaunting(merlin)\nCoseismal(merlin)\nSourish(garret)\nHaunting(garret)\nLanceolate(garret)\nHaunting(renado)\nBombastic(renado)\nforall x (Haunting(x) -> Unsown(x))\nforall x (Unsown(x) -> Sourish(x))\nHaunting(renado) -> Unsown(renado)\n\nUnsown(garret)\n\nHaunting(garret) and forall x (Haunting(x) -> Unsown(x)) -> therefore Unsown(garret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Thibaud is cognisable. Thibaud is swimming. Alexei is devouring. Alexei is cognisable. Alexei is hormonal. Johannah is cognisable. Johannah is revertible. All cognisable people are lumbar. If someone is lumbar then they are devouring. If Johannah is cognisable then Johannah is lumbar. Alexei is not lumbar.", "logic": "\nCognisable(thibaud)\nSwimming(thibaud)\nDevouring(alexei)\nCognisable(alexei)\nHormonal(alexei)\nCognisable(johannah)\nRevertible(johannah)\nforall x (Cognisable(x) -> Lumbar(x))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) -> Devouring(x))\nCognisable(johannah) -> Lumbar(johannah)\n\nnot Lumbar(alexei)\n\nCognisable(alexei) and forall x (Cognisable(x) -> Lumbar(x)) -> therefore Lumbar(alexei)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Dorry is unaerated. Dorry is paranasal. Benedicta is credible. Benedicta is unaerated. Benedicta is nonmotile. Evvy is unaerated. Evvy is epitheliod. All unaerated people are cliched. If someone is cliched then they are credible. If Evvy is unaerated then Evvy is cliched. Dorry is credible.", "logic": "\nUnaerated(dorry)\nParanasal(dorry)\nCredible(benedicta)\nUnaerated(benedicta)\nNonmotile(benedicta)\nUnaerated(evvy)\nEpitheliod(evvy)\nforall x (Unaerated(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Credible(x))\nUnaerated(evvy) -> Cliched(evvy)\n\nCredible(dorry)\n\nUnaerated(dorry) and forall x (Unaerated(x) -> Cliched(x)) -> therefore Cliched(dorry) Cliched(dorry) and forall x (Cliched(x) -> Credible(x)) -> therefore Credible(dorry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Gertrud is oily. Gertrud is romaic. Bruno is smoggy. Bruno is oily. Bruno is catching. Nanci is oily. Nanci is slicked. All oily people are pecuniary. If someone is pecuniary then they are smoggy. If Nanci is oily then Nanci is pecuniary. Gertrud is not smoggy.", "logic": "\nOily(gertrud)\nRomaic(gertrud)\nSmoggy(bruno)\nOily(bruno)\nCatching(bruno)\nOily(nanci)\nSlicked(nanci)\nforall x (Oily(x) -> Pecuniary(x))\nforall x (Pecuniary(x) -> Smoggy(x))\nOily(nanci) -> Pecuniary(nanci)\n\nnot Smoggy(gertrud)\n\nOily(gertrud) and forall x (Oily(x) -> Pecuniary(x)) -> therefore Pecuniary(gertrud) Pecuniary(gertrud) and forall x (Pecuniary(x) -> Smoggy(x)) -> therefore Smoggy(gertrud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Alexander is surefooted. Alexander is hushed. Gilburt is stained. Gilburt is surefooted. Gilburt is subtle. Hendrik is surefooted. Hendrik is errorless. All surefooted people are flowing. If someone is flowing then they are stained. If Hendrik is surefooted then Hendrik is flowing. Hendrik is not cold.", "logic": "\nSurefooted(alexander)\nHushed(alexander)\nStained(gilburt)\nSurefooted(gilburt)\nSubtle(gilburt)\nSurefooted(hendrik)\nErrorless(hendrik)\nforall x (Surefooted(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Stained(x))\nSurefooted(hendrik) -> Flowing(hendrik)\n\nnot Cold(hendrik)\n\nnot Cold(hendrik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Darla is incisive. Darla is over. Hymie is rheumatic. Hymie is incisive. Hymie is indictable. Dru is incisive. Dru is boskopoid. All incisive people are choosy. If someone is choosy then they are rheumatic. If Dru is incisive then Dru is choosy. Dru is indictable.", "logic": "\nIncisive(darla)\nOver(darla)\nRheumatic(hymie)\nIncisive(hymie)\nIndictable(hymie)\nIncisive(dru)\nBoskopoid(dru)\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Choosy(x))\nforall x (Choosy(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\nIncisive(dru) -> Choosy(dru)\n\nIndictable(dru)\n\nIndictable(dru) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Stephie is sheltered. Stephie is uncoiled. Britte is forte. Britte is sheltered. Britte is squawky. Carmel is sheltered. Carmel is unaffixed. All sheltered people are pathologic. If someone is pathologic then they are forte. If Carmel is sheltered then Carmel is pathologic. Stephie is not cold.", "logic": "\nSheltered(stephie)\nUncoiled(stephie)\nForte(britte)\nSheltered(britte)\nSquawky(britte)\nSheltered(carmel)\nUnaffixed(carmel)\nforall x (Sheltered(x) -> Pathologic(x))\nforall x (Pathologic(x) -> Forte(x))\nSheltered(carmel) -> Pathologic(carmel)\n\nnot Cold(stephie)\n\nnot Cold(stephie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Chester is barricaded. Chester is amendatory. Walker is tribal. Walker is barricaded. Walker is pondering. Rikki is barricaded. Rikki is racy. All barricaded people are waxy. If someone is waxy then they are tribal. If Rikki is barricaded then Rikki is waxy. Walker is cold.", "logic": "\nBarricaded(chester)\nAmendatory(chester)\nTribal(walker)\nBarricaded(walker)\nPondering(walker)\nBarricaded(rikki)\nRacy(rikki)\nforall x (Barricaded(x) -> Waxy(x))\nforall x (Waxy(x) -> Tribal(x))\nBarricaded(rikki) -> Waxy(rikki)\n\nCold(walker)\n\nCold(walker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Eugine is splenic. Eugine is demoniac. Charla is vocal. Charla is splenic. Charla is spasmodic. Junia is splenic. Junia is gabonese. All splenic people are nontoxic. If someone is nontoxic then they are vocal. If Junia is splenic then Junia is nontoxic. Charla is not gabonese.", "logic": "\nSplenic(eugine)\nDemoniac(eugine)\nVocal(charla)\nSplenic(charla)\nSpasmodic(charla)\nSplenic(junia)\nGabonese(junia)\nforall x (Splenic(x) -> Nontoxic(x))\nforall x (Nontoxic(x) -> Vocal(x))\nSplenic(junia) -> Nontoxic(junia)\n\nnot Gabonese(charla)\n\nnot Gabonese(charla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Waiter is stone. Waiter is noisome. Gena is noduled. Gena is stone. Gena is unbordered. Ileane is stone. Ileane is coral. All stone people are patrician. If someone is patrician then they are noduled. If Ileane is stone then Ileane is patrician. Ileane is noisome.", "logic": "\nStone(waiter)\nNoisome(waiter)\nNoduled(gena)\nStone(gena)\nUnbordered(gena)\nStone(ileane)\nCoral(ileane)\nforall x (Stone(x) -> Patrician(x))\nforall x (Patrician(x) -> Noduled(x))\nStone(ileane) -> Patrician(ileane)\n\nNoisome(ileane)\n\nNoisome(ileane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Joete is nonfissile. Joete is savage. Joete is goosey. Corabelle is nonfissile. Corabelle is goosey. Corabelle is submerged. Marj is nonfissile. Marj is horary. Marj is savage. Marj is anodal. Marj is goosey. Marj is submerged. Marj is unborn. Paulina is savage. Paulina is unborn. Green people are unborn. If someone is savage and unborn then they are nonfissile. If someone is submerged then they are nonfissile. Green people are anodal. If someone is anodal then they are goosey. All horary, submerged people are anodal. Kind, goosey people are submerged. If someone is nonfissile and unborn then they are horary. Marj is savage.", "logic": "\nNonfissile(joete)\nSavage(joete)\nGoosey(joete)\nNonfissile(corabelle)\nGoosey(corabelle)\nSubmerged(corabelle)\nNonfissile(marj)\nHorary(marj)\nSavage(marj)\nAnodal(marj)\nGoosey(marj)\nSubmerged(marj)\nUnborn(marj)\nSavage(paulina)\nUnborn(paulina)\nforall x (Horary(x) -> Unborn(x))\nforall x (Savage(x) and Unborn(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Submerged(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Horary(x) -> Anodal(x))\nforall x (Anodal(x) -> Goosey(x))\nforall x (Horary(x) and Submerged(x) -> Anodal(x))\nforall x (Savage(x) and Goosey(x) -> Submerged(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) and Unborn(x) -> Horary(x))\n\nSavage(marj)\n\ntherefore Savage(marj)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Elli is patented. Elli is cadenced. Elli is airborne. Damon is patented. Damon is airborne. Damon is vertical. Paten is patented. Paten is baroque. Paten is cadenced. Paten is wondrous. Paten is airborne. Paten is vertical. Paten is balanced. Sidoney is cadenced. Sidoney is balanced. Green people are balanced. If someone is cadenced and balanced then they are patented. If someone is vertical then they are patented. Green people are wondrous. If someone is wondrous then they are airborne. All baroque, vertical people are wondrous. Kind, airborne people are vertical. If someone is patented and balanced then they are baroque. Elli is not cadenced.", "logic": "\nPatented(elli)\nCadenced(elli)\nAirborne(elli)\nPatented(damon)\nAirborne(damon)\nVertical(damon)\nPatented(paten)\nBaroque(paten)\nCadenced(paten)\nWondrous(paten)\nAirborne(paten)\nVertical(paten)\nBalanced(paten)\nCadenced(sidoney)\nBalanced(sidoney)\nforall x (Baroque(x) -> Balanced(x))\nforall x (Cadenced(x) and Balanced(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) -> Wondrous(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) and Vertical(x) -> Wondrous(x))\nforall x (Cadenced(x) and Airborne(x) -> Vertical(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) and Balanced(x) -> Baroque(x))\n\nnot Cadenced(elli)\n\ntherefore Cadenced(elli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Erich is evaluative. Erich is almighty. Erich is mushy. Smith is evaluative. Smith is mushy. Smith is pyknotic. Phillipp is evaluative. Phillipp is rigorous. Phillipp is almighty. Phillipp is aecial. Phillipp is mushy. Phillipp is pyknotic. Phillipp is southeast. Mateo is almighty. Mateo is southeast. Green people are southeast. If someone is almighty and southeast then they are evaluative. If someone is pyknotic then they are evaluative. Green people are aecial. If someone is aecial then they are mushy. All rigorous, pyknotic people are aecial. Kind, mushy people are pyknotic. If someone is evaluative and southeast then they are rigorous. Erich is pyknotic.", "logic": "\nEvaluative(erich)\nAlmighty(erich)\nMushy(erich)\nEvaluative(smith)\nMushy(smith)\nPyknotic(smith)\nEvaluative(phillipp)\nRigorous(phillipp)\nAlmighty(phillipp)\nAecial(phillipp)\nMushy(phillipp)\nPyknotic(phillipp)\nSoutheast(phillipp)\nAlmighty(mateo)\nSoutheast(mateo)\nforall x (Rigorous(x) -> Southeast(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) and Southeast(x) -> Evaluative(x))\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Evaluative(x))\nforall x (Rigorous(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Mushy(x))\nforall x (Rigorous(x) and Pyknotic(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) and Mushy(x) -> Pyknotic(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) and Southeast(x) -> Rigorous(x))\n\nPyknotic(erich)\n\nAlmighty(erich) and Mushy(erich) and forall x (Almighty(x) and Mushy(x) -> Pyknotic(x)) -> therefore Pyknotic(erich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Phebe is versatile. Phebe is slanting. Phebe is aramaic. Jaquith is versatile. Jaquith is aramaic. Jaquith is pestilent. Katherina is versatile. Katherina is pukka. Katherina is slanting. Katherina is ergonomic. Katherina is aramaic. Katherina is pestilent. Katherina is cuboidal. Elsa is slanting. Elsa is cuboidal. Green people are cuboidal. If someone is slanting and cuboidal then they are versatile. If someone is pestilent then they are versatile. Green people are ergonomic. If someone is ergonomic then they are aramaic. All pukka, pestilent people are ergonomic. Kind, aramaic people are pestilent. If someone is versatile and cuboidal then they are pukka. Phebe is not pestilent.", "logic": "\nVersatile(phebe)\nSlanting(phebe)\nAramaic(phebe)\nVersatile(jaquith)\nAramaic(jaquith)\nPestilent(jaquith)\nVersatile(katherina)\nPukka(katherina)\nSlanting(katherina)\nErgonomic(katherina)\nAramaic(katherina)\nPestilent(katherina)\nCuboidal(katherina)\nSlanting(elsa)\nCuboidal(elsa)\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Cuboidal(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) and Cuboidal(x) -> Versatile(x))\nforall x (Pestilent(x) -> Versatile(x))\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Ergonomic(x))\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nforall x (Pukka(x) and Pestilent(x) -> Ergonomic(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Pestilent(x))\nforall x (Versatile(x) and Cuboidal(x) -> Pukka(x))\n\nnot Pestilent(phebe)\n\nSlanting(phebe) and Aramaic(phebe) and forall x (Slanting(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Pestilent(x)) -> therefore Pestilent(phebe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Libbi is alkalic. Libbi is unpermed. Libbi is compound. Mendie is alkalic. Mendie is compound. Mendie is merging. Chandler is alkalic. Chandler is penial. Chandler is unpermed. Chandler is precocial. Chandler is compound. Chandler is merging. Chandler is fraternal. Vena is unpermed. Vena is fraternal. Green people are fraternal. If someone is unpermed and fraternal then they are alkalic. If someone is merging then they are alkalic. Green people are precocial. If someone is precocial then they are compound. All penial, merging people are precocial. Kind, compound people are merging. If someone is alkalic and fraternal then they are penial. Vena is penial.", "logic": "\nAlkalic(libbi)\nUnpermed(libbi)\nCompound(libbi)\nAlkalic(mendie)\nCompound(mendie)\nMerging(mendie)\nAlkalic(chandler)\nPenial(chandler)\nUnpermed(chandler)\nPrecocial(chandler)\nCompound(chandler)\nMerging(chandler)\nFraternal(chandler)\nUnpermed(vena)\nFraternal(vena)\nforall x (Penial(x) -> Fraternal(x))\nforall x (Unpermed(x) and Fraternal(x) -> Alkalic(x))\nforall x (Merging(x) -> Alkalic(x))\nforall x (Penial(x) -> Precocial(x))\nforall x (Precocial(x) -> Compound(x))\nforall x (Penial(x) and Merging(x) -> Precocial(x))\nforall x (Unpermed(x) and Compound(x) -> Merging(x))\nforall x (Alkalic(x) and Fraternal(x) -> Penial(x))\n\nPenial(vena)\n\nUnpermed(vena) and Fraternal(vena) and forall x (Unpermed(x) and Fraternal(x) -> Alkalic(x)) -> therefore Alkalic(vena) Alkalic(vena) and Fraternal(vena) and forall x (Alkalic(x) and Fraternal(x) -> Penial(x)) -> therefore Penial(vena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Emanuel is analgetic. Emanuel is awake. Emanuel is premium. Caspar is analgetic. Caspar is premium. Caspar is haematic. Martainn is analgetic. Martainn is discreet. Martainn is awake. Martainn is babelike. Martainn is premium. Martainn is haematic. Martainn is fewer. Allis is awake. Allis is fewer. Green people are fewer. If someone is awake and fewer then they are analgetic. If someone is haematic then they are analgetic. Green people are babelike. If someone is babelike then they are premium. All discreet, haematic people are babelike. Kind, premium people are haematic. If someone is analgetic and fewer then they are discreet. Allis is not discreet.", "logic": "\nAnalgetic(emanuel)\nAwake(emanuel)\nPremium(emanuel)\nAnalgetic(caspar)\nPremium(caspar)\nHaematic(caspar)\nAnalgetic(martainn)\nDiscreet(martainn)\nAwake(martainn)\nBabelike(martainn)\nPremium(martainn)\nHaematic(martainn)\nFewer(martainn)\nAwake(allis)\nFewer(allis)\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Fewer(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) and Fewer(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Babelike(x))\nforall x (Babelike(x) -> Premium(x))\nforall x (Discreet(x) and Haematic(x) -> Babelike(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) and Premium(x) -> Haematic(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) and Fewer(x) -> Discreet(x))\n\nnot Discreet(allis)\n\nAwake(allis) and Fewer(allis) and forall x (Awake(x) and Fewer(x) -> Analgetic(x)) -> therefore Analgetic(allis) Analgetic(allis) and Fewer(allis) and forall x (Analgetic(x) and Fewer(x) -> Discreet(x)) -> therefore Discreet(allis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Rose is alvine. Rose is limacine. Rose is working. Thaine is alvine. Thaine is working. Thaine is thorough. Ashleigh is alvine. Ashleigh is icebound. Ashleigh is limacine. Ashleigh is middling. Ashleigh is working. Ashleigh is thorough. Ashleigh is bistered. Morly is limacine. Morly is bistered. Green people are bistered. If someone is limacine and bistered then they are alvine. If someone is thorough then they are alvine. Green people are middling. If someone is middling then they are working. All icebound, thorough people are middling. Kind, working people are thorough. If someone is alvine and bistered then they are icebound. Thaine is not middling.", "logic": "\nAlvine(rose)\nLimacine(rose)\nWorking(rose)\nAlvine(thaine)\nWorking(thaine)\nThorough(thaine)\nAlvine(ashleigh)\nIcebound(ashleigh)\nLimacine(ashleigh)\nMiddling(ashleigh)\nWorking(ashleigh)\nThorough(ashleigh)\nBistered(ashleigh)\nLimacine(morly)\nBistered(morly)\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Bistered(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Bistered(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Middling(x))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Working(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) and Thorough(x) -> Middling(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Working(x) -> Thorough(x))\nforall x (Alvine(x) and Bistered(x) -> Icebound(x))\n\nnot Middling(thaine)\n\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Middling(x)) <- forall x (Alvine(x) and Bistered(x) -> Icebound(x)) <- forall x (Icebound(x) -> Bistered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Gerold is homocercal. Gerold is handy. Gerold is bicuspid. Karie is homocercal. Karie is bicuspid. Karie is soused. Amalita is homocercal. Amalita is waspish. Amalita is handy. Amalita is working. Amalita is bicuspid. Amalita is soused. Amalita is algal. Vail is handy. Vail is algal. Green people are algal. If someone is handy and algal then they are homocercal. If someone is soused then they are homocercal. Green people are working. If someone is working then they are bicuspid. All waspish, soused people are working. Kind, bicuspid people are soused. If someone is homocercal and algal then they are waspish. Karie is algal.", "logic": "\nHomocercal(gerold)\nHandy(gerold)\nBicuspid(gerold)\nHomocercal(karie)\nBicuspid(karie)\nSoused(karie)\nHomocercal(amalita)\nWaspish(amalita)\nHandy(amalita)\nWorking(amalita)\nBicuspid(amalita)\nSoused(amalita)\nAlgal(amalita)\nHandy(vail)\nAlgal(vail)\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> Algal(x))\nforall x (Handy(x) and Algal(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Soused(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> Working(x))\nforall x (Working(x) -> Bicuspid(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) and Soused(x) -> Working(x))\nforall x (Handy(x) and Bicuspid(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) and Algal(x) -> Waspish(x))\n\nAlgal(karie)\n\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> Algal(x)) <- forall x (Homocercal(x) and Algal(x) -> Waspish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Maggie is iraqi. Maggie is semirigid. Maggie is arrhythmic. Rocky is iraqi. Rocky is arrhythmic. Rocky is collusive. Shelden is iraqi. Shelden is crushing. Shelden is semirigid. Shelden is heady. Shelden is arrhythmic. Shelden is collusive. Shelden is chinless. Durante is semirigid. Durante is chinless. Green people are chinless. If someone is semirigid and chinless then they are iraqi. If someone is collusive then they are iraqi. Green people are heady. If someone is heady then they are arrhythmic. All crushing, collusive people are heady. Kind, arrhythmic people are collusive. If someone is iraqi and chinless then they are crushing. Rocky is not crushing.", "logic": "\nIraqi(maggie)\nSemirigid(maggie)\nArrhythmic(maggie)\nIraqi(rocky)\nArrhythmic(rocky)\nCollusive(rocky)\nIraqi(shelden)\nCrushing(shelden)\nSemirigid(shelden)\nHeady(shelden)\nArrhythmic(shelden)\nCollusive(shelden)\nChinless(shelden)\nSemirigid(durante)\nChinless(durante)\nforall x (Crushing(x) -> Chinless(x))\nforall x (Semirigid(x) and Chinless(x) -> Iraqi(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Iraqi(x))\nforall x (Crushing(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Heady(x) -> Arrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Crushing(x) and Collusive(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Semirigid(x) and Arrhythmic(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Iraqi(x) and Chinless(x) -> Crushing(x))\n\nnot Crushing(rocky)\n\nforall x (Iraqi(x) and Chinless(x) -> Crushing(x)) <- forall x (Crushing(x) -> Chinless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Olimpia is bouldery. Olimpia is stubborn. Olimpia is monogamous. Fallon is bouldery. Fallon is monogamous. Fallon is deadened. Lona is bouldery. Lona is thickset. Lona is stubborn. Lona is wiry. Lona is monogamous. Lona is deadened. Lona is abashed. Ethelbert is stubborn. Ethelbert is abashed. Green people are abashed. If someone is stubborn and abashed then they are bouldery. If someone is deadened then they are bouldery. Green people are wiry. If someone is wiry then they are monogamous. All thickset, deadened people are wiry. Kind, monogamous people are deadened. If someone is bouldery and abashed then they are thickset. Fallon is stubborn.", "logic": "\nBouldery(olimpia)\nStubborn(olimpia)\nMonogamous(olimpia)\nBouldery(fallon)\nMonogamous(fallon)\nDeadened(fallon)\nBouldery(lona)\nThickset(lona)\nStubborn(lona)\nWiry(lona)\nMonogamous(lona)\nDeadened(lona)\nAbashed(lona)\nStubborn(ethelbert)\nAbashed(ethelbert)\nforall x (Thickset(x) -> Abashed(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) and Abashed(x) -> Bouldery(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) -> Bouldery(x))\nforall x (Thickset(x) -> Wiry(x))\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Monogamous(x))\nforall x (Thickset(x) and Deadened(x) -> Wiry(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Deadened(x))\nforall x (Bouldery(x) and Abashed(x) -> Thickset(x))\n\nStubborn(fallon)\n\nStubborn(fallon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-868"} {"premises": "Gabie is prevalent. Gabie is trained. Gabie is not diverting. Jolie is biaural. Jolie is prevalent. Jolie is centrist. Jolie is downfield. Sollie is unexpired. Sollie is prevalent. Sollie is trained. Sollie is diverting. Sollie is centrist. Sollie is downfield. Ardra is unexpired. Ardra is prevalent. Ardra is trained. If someone is centrist then they are downfield. If someone is prevalent and trained then they are centrist. Jolie is biaural.", "logic": "\nPrevalent(gabie)\nTrained(gabie)\nnot Diverting(gabie)\nBiaural(jolie)\nPrevalent(jolie)\nCentrist(jolie)\nDownfield(jolie)\nUnexpired(sollie)\nPrevalent(sollie)\nTrained(sollie)\nDiverting(sollie)\nCentrist(sollie)\nDownfield(sollie)\nUnexpired(ardra)\nPrevalent(ardra)\nTrained(ardra)\nforall x (Centrist(x) -> Downfield(x))\nforall x (Prevalent(x) and Trained(x) -> Centrist(x))\n\nBiaural(jolie)\n\ntherefore Biaural(jolie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Kissiah is aleuronic. Kissiah is duteous. Kissiah is not glum. Amalie is fugly. Amalie is aleuronic. Amalie is numberless. Amalie is renal. Janaya is locomotive. Janaya is aleuronic. Janaya is duteous. Janaya is glum. Janaya is numberless. Janaya is renal. Kimball is locomotive. Kimball is aleuronic. Kimball is duteous. If someone is numberless then they are renal. If someone is aleuronic and duteous then they are numberless. Kimball is not duteous.", "logic": "\nAleuronic(kissiah)\nDuteous(kissiah)\nnot Glum(kissiah)\nFugly(amalie)\nAleuronic(amalie)\nNumberless(amalie)\nRenal(amalie)\nLocomotive(janaya)\nAleuronic(janaya)\nDuteous(janaya)\nGlum(janaya)\nNumberless(janaya)\nRenal(janaya)\nLocomotive(kimball)\nAleuronic(kimball)\nDuteous(kimball)\nforall x (Numberless(x) -> Renal(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Duteous(x) -> Numberless(x))\n\nnot Duteous(kimball)\n\ntherefore Duteous(kimball)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Jannel is unwished. Jannel is laotian. Jannel is not placid. Franni is vertical. Franni is unwished. Franni is umteen. Franni is beatified. Renault is bullate. Renault is unwished. Renault is laotian. Renault is placid. Renault is umteen. Renault is beatified. Sax is bullate. Sax is unwished. Sax is laotian. If someone is umteen then they are beatified. If someone is unwished and laotian then they are umteen. Jannel is umteen.", "logic": "\nUnwished(jannel)\nLaotian(jannel)\nnot Placid(jannel)\nVertical(franni)\nUnwished(franni)\nUmteen(franni)\nBeatified(franni)\nBullate(renault)\nUnwished(renault)\nLaotian(renault)\nPlacid(renault)\nUmteen(renault)\nBeatified(renault)\nBullate(sax)\nUnwished(sax)\nLaotian(sax)\nforall x (Umteen(x) -> Beatified(x))\nforall x (Unwished(x) and Laotian(x) -> Umteen(x))\n\nUmteen(jannel)\n\nUnwished(jannel) and Laotian(jannel) and forall x (Unwished(x) and Laotian(x) -> Umteen(x)) -> therefore Umteen(jannel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Doralyn is dateless. Doralyn is theist. Doralyn is not cosmogonic. Zara is filarial. Zara is dateless. Zara is unlocated. Zara is tongueless. Dennie is yonder. Dennie is dateless. Dennie is theist. Dennie is cosmogonic. Dennie is unlocated. Dennie is tongueless. Mohan is yonder. Mohan is dateless. Mohan is theist. If someone is unlocated then they are tongueless. If someone is dateless and theist then they are unlocated. Mohan is not unlocated.", "logic": "\nDateless(doralyn)\nTheist(doralyn)\nnot Cosmogonic(doralyn)\nFilarial(zara)\nDateless(zara)\nUnlocated(zara)\nTongueless(zara)\nYonder(dennie)\nDateless(dennie)\nTheist(dennie)\nCosmogonic(dennie)\nUnlocated(dennie)\nTongueless(dennie)\nYonder(mohan)\nDateless(mohan)\nTheist(mohan)\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Dateless(x) and Theist(x) -> Unlocated(x))\n\nnot Unlocated(mohan)\n\nDateless(mohan) and Theist(mohan) and forall x (Dateless(x) and Theist(x) -> Unlocated(x)) -> therefore Unlocated(mohan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Jeana is federated. Jeana is ocellated. Jeana is not painterly. Gill is wide. Gill is federated. Gill is bouldery. Gill is sentential. Enriqueta is beseeching. Enriqueta is federated. Enriqueta is ocellated. Enriqueta is painterly. Enriqueta is bouldery. Enriqueta is sentential. Caterina is beseeching. Caterina is federated. Caterina is ocellated. If someone is bouldery then they are sentential. If someone is federated and ocellated then they are bouldery. Caterina is sentential.", "logic": "\nFederated(jeana)\nOcellated(jeana)\nnot Painterly(jeana)\nWide(gill)\nFederated(gill)\nBouldery(gill)\nSentential(gill)\nBeseeching(enriqueta)\nFederated(enriqueta)\nOcellated(enriqueta)\nPainterly(enriqueta)\nBouldery(enriqueta)\nSentential(enriqueta)\nBeseeching(caterina)\nFederated(caterina)\nOcellated(caterina)\nforall x (Bouldery(x) -> Sentential(x))\nforall x (Federated(x) and Ocellated(x) -> Bouldery(x))\n\nSentential(caterina)\n\nFederated(caterina) and Ocellated(caterina) and forall x (Federated(x) and Ocellated(x) -> Bouldery(x)) -> therefore Bouldery(caterina) Bouldery(caterina) and forall x (Bouldery(x) -> Sentential(x)) -> therefore Sentential(caterina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Carlotta is lucifugal. Carlotta is larghetto. Carlotta is not bedraggled. Cybill is megascopic. Cybill is lucifugal. Cybill is cragfast. Cybill is born. Emlynne is fixed. Emlynne is lucifugal. Emlynne is larghetto. Emlynne is bedraggled. Emlynne is cragfast. Emlynne is born. Rudy is fixed. Rudy is lucifugal. Rudy is larghetto. If someone is cragfast then they are born. If someone is lucifugal and larghetto then they are cragfast. Carlotta is not born.", "logic": "\nLucifugal(carlotta)\nLarghetto(carlotta)\nnot Bedraggled(carlotta)\nMegascopic(cybill)\nLucifugal(cybill)\nCragfast(cybill)\nBorn(cybill)\nFixed(emlynne)\nLucifugal(emlynne)\nLarghetto(emlynne)\nBedraggled(emlynne)\nCragfast(emlynne)\nBorn(emlynne)\nFixed(rudy)\nLucifugal(rudy)\nLarghetto(rudy)\nforall x (Cragfast(x) -> Born(x))\nforall x (Lucifugal(x) and Larghetto(x) -> Cragfast(x))\n\nnot Born(carlotta)\n\nLucifugal(carlotta) and Larghetto(carlotta) and forall x (Lucifugal(x) and Larghetto(x) -> Cragfast(x)) -> therefore Cragfast(carlotta) Cragfast(carlotta) and forall x (Cragfast(x) -> Born(x)) -> therefore Born(carlotta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Dexter is pauline. Dexter is unfastened. Dexter is not rancid. Lishe is afghan. Lishe is pauline. Lishe is hairy. Lishe is revolved. Orelee is eastern. Orelee is pauline. Orelee is unfastened. Orelee is rancid. Orelee is hairy. Orelee is revolved. Rona is eastern. Rona is pauline. Rona is unfastened. If someone is hairy then they are revolved. If someone is pauline and unfastened then they are hairy. Rona is not rancid.", "logic": "\nPauline(dexter)\nUnfastened(dexter)\nnot Rancid(dexter)\nAfghan(lishe)\nPauline(lishe)\nHairy(lishe)\nRevolved(lishe)\nEastern(orelee)\nPauline(orelee)\nUnfastened(orelee)\nRancid(orelee)\nHairy(orelee)\nRevolved(orelee)\nEastern(rona)\nPauline(rona)\nUnfastened(rona)\nforall x (Hairy(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Pauline(x) and Unfastened(x) -> Hairy(x))\n\nnot Rancid(rona)\n\nnot Rancid(rona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Thaddus is gloomful. Thaddus is molal. Thaddus is not christian. Beverlie is unshelled. Beverlie is gloomful. Beverlie is bold. Beverlie is unknowing. Melba is hundred. Melba is gloomful. Melba is molal. Melba is christian. Melba is bold. Melba is unknowing. Mareah is hundred. Mareah is gloomful. Mareah is molal. If someone is bold then they are unknowing. If someone is gloomful and molal then they are bold. Beverlie is hundred.", "logic": "\nGloomful(thaddus)\nMolal(thaddus)\nnot Christian(thaddus)\nUnshelled(beverlie)\nGloomful(beverlie)\nBold(beverlie)\nUnknowing(beverlie)\nHundred(melba)\nGloomful(melba)\nMolal(melba)\nChristian(melba)\nBold(melba)\nUnknowing(melba)\nHundred(mareah)\nGloomful(mareah)\nMolal(mareah)\nforall x (Bold(x) -> Unknowing(x))\nforall x (Gloomful(x) and Molal(x) -> Bold(x))\n\nHundred(beverlie)\n\nHundred(beverlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Nicholle is filled. Nicholle is adulterous. Nicholle is not vesicatory. Nedi is efficient. Nedi is filled. Nedi is breakable. Nedi is imbricate. Isabelle is filariid. Isabelle is filled. Isabelle is adulterous. Isabelle is vesicatory. Isabelle is breakable. Isabelle is imbricate. Clark is filariid. Clark is filled. Clark is adulterous. If someone is breakable then they are imbricate. If someone is filled and adulterous then they are breakable. Nicholle is not filariid.", "logic": "\nFilled(nicholle)\nAdulterous(nicholle)\nnot Vesicatory(nicholle)\nEfficient(nedi)\nFilled(nedi)\nBreakable(nedi)\nImbricate(nedi)\nFilariid(isabelle)\nFilled(isabelle)\nAdulterous(isabelle)\nVesicatory(isabelle)\nBreakable(isabelle)\nImbricate(isabelle)\nFilariid(clark)\nFilled(clark)\nAdulterous(clark)\nforall x (Breakable(x) -> Imbricate(x))\nforall x (Filled(x) and Adulterous(x) -> Breakable(x))\n\nnot Filariid(nicholle)\n\nnot Filariid(nicholle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Levin is voidable. Levin is affected. Levin is not unfamiliar. Kirsti is profitable. Kirsti is voidable. Kirsti is spry. Kirsti is irksome. Glad is microsomal. Glad is voidable. Glad is affected. Glad is unfamiliar. Glad is spry. Glad is irksome. Bradly is microsomal. Bradly is voidable. Bradly is affected. If someone is spry then they are irksome. If someone is voidable and affected then they are spry. Bradly is profitable.", "logic": "\nVoidable(levin)\nAffected(levin)\nnot Unfamiliar(levin)\nProfitable(kirsti)\nVoidable(kirsti)\nSpry(kirsti)\nIrksome(kirsti)\nMicrosomal(glad)\nVoidable(glad)\nAffected(glad)\nUnfamiliar(glad)\nSpry(glad)\nIrksome(glad)\nMicrosomal(bradly)\nVoidable(bradly)\nAffected(bradly)\nforall x (Spry(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Voidable(x) and Affected(x) -> Spry(x))\n\nProfitable(bradly)\n\nProfitable(bradly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Claudina is brag. Claudina is clattery. Claudina is not vaccinated. Hermann is clipped. Hermann is brag. Hermann is gouty. Hermann is volatile. Earl is protean. Earl is brag. Earl is clattery. Earl is vaccinated. Earl is gouty. Earl is volatile. Jayne is protean. Jayne is brag. Jayne is clattery. If someone is gouty then they are volatile. If someone is brag and clattery then they are gouty. Hermann is not clattery.", "logic": "\nBrag(claudina)\nClattery(claudina)\nnot Vaccinated(claudina)\nClipped(hermann)\nBrag(hermann)\nGouty(hermann)\nVolatile(hermann)\nProtean(earl)\nBrag(earl)\nClattery(earl)\nVaccinated(earl)\nGouty(earl)\nVolatile(earl)\nProtean(jayne)\nBrag(jayne)\nClattery(jayne)\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Volatile(x))\nforall x (Brag(x) and Clattery(x) -> Gouty(x))\n\nnot Clattery(hermann)\n\nnot Clattery(hermann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "Abigale is coenobitic. Abigale is pavlovian. Abigale is not sour. Gwendolin is unlivable. Gwendolin is coenobitic. Gwendolin is keyless. Gwendolin is sanctioned. Pate is casteless. Pate is coenobitic. Pate is pavlovian. Pate is sour. Pate is keyless. Pate is sanctioned. Steffie is casteless. Steffie is coenobitic. Steffie is pavlovian. If someone is keyless then they are sanctioned. If someone is coenobitic and pavlovian then they are keyless. Gwendolin is sour.", "logic": "\nCoenobitic(abigale)\nPavlovian(abigale)\nnot Sour(abigale)\nUnlivable(gwendolin)\nCoenobitic(gwendolin)\nKeyless(gwendolin)\nSanctioned(gwendolin)\nCasteless(pate)\nCoenobitic(pate)\nPavlovian(pate)\nSour(pate)\nKeyless(pate)\nSanctioned(pate)\nCasteless(steffie)\nCoenobitic(steffie)\nPavlovian(steffie)\nforall x (Keyless(x) -> Sanctioned(x))\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) and Pavlovian(x) -> Keyless(x))\n\nSour(gwendolin)\n\nSour(gwendolin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-929"} {"premises": "The sara brandish the rosetta. The magdalen rise the alphonso. The magdalen does not like the sara. The rosetta dart the sara. The rosetta dart the magdalen. The rosetta dart the alphonso. The rosetta brandish the magdalen. The rosetta brandish the alphonso. The alphonso does not eat the rosetta. The alphonso is prosy. The alphonso is scrub. The alphonso brandish the magdalen. If the sara rise the alphonso and the sara does not like the magdalen then the magdalen rise the sara. If someone is prosy and they do not eat the magdalen then the magdalen is not prosy. If someone is uneager then they are alular. If someone dart the alphonso then the alphonso is uneager. If someone brandish the alphonso then they are not uneager. If someone dart the sara and the sara does not like the alphonso then they are not scrub. The magdalen does not like the sara.", "logic": "\nBrandish(sara, rosetta)\nRise(magdalen, alphonso)\nnot Brandish(magdalen, sara)\nDart(rosetta, sara)\nDart(rosetta, magdalen)\nDart(rosetta, alphonso)\nBrandish(rosetta, magdalen)\nBrandish(rosetta, alphonso)\nnot Dart(alphonso, rosetta)\nProsy(alphonso)\nScrub(alphonso)\nBrandish(alphonso, magdalen)\nRise(sara, alphonso) and not Brandish(sara, magdalen) -> Rise(magdalen, sara)\nforall x (Prosy(x) and not Dart(x, magdalen) -> not Prosy(magdalen))\nforall x (Uneager(x) -> Alular(x))\nforall x (Dart(x, alphonso) -> Uneager(alphonso))\nforall x (Brandish(x, alphonso) -> not Uneager(x))\nforall x (Dart(x, sara) and not Brandish(sara, alphonso) -> not Scrub(x))\n\nnot Brandish(magdalen, sara)\n\ntherefore not Brandish(magdalen, sara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The marline drudge the jeffry. The tarzan lateralize the goldie. The tarzan does not like the marline. The jeffry conflate the marline. The jeffry conflate the tarzan. The jeffry conflate the goldie. The jeffry drudge the tarzan. The jeffry drudge the goldie. The goldie does not eat the jeffry. The goldie is worldwide. The goldie is manageable. The goldie drudge the tarzan. If the marline lateralize the goldie and the marline does not like the tarzan then the tarzan lateralize the marline. If someone is worldwide and they do not eat the tarzan then the tarzan is not worldwide. If someone is clubbable then they are altricial. If someone conflate the goldie then the goldie is clubbable. If someone drudge the goldie then they are not clubbable. If someone conflate the marline and the marline does not like the goldie then they are not manageable. The jeffry does not like the goldie.", "logic": "\nDrudge(marline, jeffry)\nLateralize(tarzan, goldie)\nnot Drudge(tarzan, marline)\nConflate(jeffry, marline)\nConflate(jeffry, tarzan)\nConflate(jeffry, goldie)\nDrudge(jeffry, tarzan)\nDrudge(jeffry, goldie)\nnot Conflate(goldie, jeffry)\nWorldwide(goldie)\nManageable(goldie)\nDrudge(goldie, tarzan)\nLateralize(marline, goldie) and not Drudge(marline, tarzan) -> Lateralize(tarzan, marline)\nforall x (Worldwide(x) and not Conflate(x, tarzan) -> not Worldwide(tarzan))\nforall x (Clubbable(x) -> Altricial(x))\nforall x (Conflate(x, goldie) -> Clubbable(goldie))\nforall x (Drudge(x, goldie) -> not Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Conflate(x, marline) and not Drudge(marline, goldie) -> not Manageable(x))\n\nnot Drudge(jeffry, goldie)\n\ntherefore Drudge(jeffry, goldie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The lemuel foray the audrye. The davide remount the larine. The davide does not like the lemuel. The audrye consort the lemuel. The audrye consort the davide. The audrye consort the larine. The audrye foray the davide. The audrye foray the larine. The larine does not eat the audrye. The larine is motherly. The larine is eightieth. The larine foray the davide. If the lemuel remount the larine and the lemuel does not like the davide then the davide remount the lemuel. If someone is motherly and they do not eat the davide then the davide is not motherly. If someone is vendible then they are dendroidal. If someone consort the larine then the larine is vendible. If someone foray the larine then they are not vendible. If someone consort the lemuel and the lemuel does not like the larine then they are not eightieth. The larine is vendible.", "logic": "\nForay(lemuel, audrye)\nRemount(davide, larine)\nnot Foray(davide, lemuel)\nConsort(audrye, lemuel)\nConsort(audrye, davide)\nConsort(audrye, larine)\nForay(audrye, davide)\nForay(audrye, larine)\nnot Consort(larine, audrye)\nMotherly(larine)\nEightieth(larine)\nForay(larine, davide)\nRemount(lemuel, larine) and not Foray(lemuel, davide) -> Remount(davide, lemuel)\nforall x (Motherly(x) and not Consort(x, davide) -> not Motherly(davide))\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Dendroidal(x))\nforall x (Consort(x, larine) -> Vendible(larine))\nforall x (Foray(x, larine) -> not Vendible(x))\nforall x (Consort(x, lemuel) and not Foray(lemuel, larine) -> not Eightieth(x))\n\nVendible(larine)\n\nConsort(audrye, larine) and forall x (Consort(x, larine) -> Vendible(larine)) -> therefore Vendible(larine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The adena troop the michail. The efram qualify the marleah. The efram does not like the adena. The michail impact the adena. The michail impact the efram. The michail impact the marleah. The michail troop the efram. The michail troop the marleah. The marleah does not eat the michail. The marleah is avuncular. The marleah is intuitive. The marleah troop the efram. If the adena qualify the marleah and the adena does not like the efram then the efram qualify the adena. If someone is avuncular and they do not eat the efram then the efram is not avuncular. If someone is accurate then they are tyrannous. If someone impact the marleah then the marleah is accurate. If someone troop the marleah then they are not accurate. If someone impact the adena and the adena does not like the marleah then they are not intuitive. The michail is accurate.", "logic": "\nTroop(adena, michail)\nQualify(efram, marleah)\nnot Troop(efram, adena)\nImpact(michail, adena)\nImpact(michail, efram)\nImpact(michail, marleah)\nTroop(michail, efram)\nTroop(michail, marleah)\nnot Impact(marleah, michail)\nAvuncular(marleah)\nIntuitive(marleah)\nTroop(marleah, efram)\nQualify(adena, marleah) and not Troop(adena, efram) -> Qualify(efram, adena)\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and not Impact(x, efram) -> not Avuncular(efram))\nforall x (Accurate(x) -> Tyrannous(x))\nforall x (Impact(x, marleah) -> Accurate(marleah))\nforall x (Troop(x, marleah) -> not Accurate(x))\nforall x (Impact(x, adena) and not Troop(adena, marleah) -> not Intuitive(x))\n\nAccurate(michail)\n\nTroop(michail, marleah) and forall x (Troop(x, marleah) -> not Accurate(x)) -> therefore not Accurate(michail)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The cob deject the agace. The vladamir hydrolyze the korney. The vladamir does not like the cob. The agace twill the cob. The agace twill the vladamir. The agace twill the korney. The agace deject the vladamir. The agace deject the korney. The korney does not eat the agace. The korney is cushioned. The korney is unservile. The korney deject the vladamir. If the cob hydrolyze the korney and the cob does not like the vladamir then the vladamir hydrolyze the cob. If someone is cushioned and they do not eat the vladamir then the vladamir is not cushioned. If someone is witty then they are consuming. If someone twill the korney then the korney is witty. If someone deject the korney then they are not witty. If someone twill the cob and the cob does not like the korney then they are not unservile. The korney is consuming.", "logic": "\nDeject(cob, agace)\nHydrolyze(vladamir, korney)\nnot Deject(vladamir, cob)\nTwill(agace, cob)\nTwill(agace, vladamir)\nTwill(agace, korney)\nDeject(agace, vladamir)\nDeject(agace, korney)\nnot Twill(korney, agace)\nCushioned(korney)\nUnservile(korney)\nDeject(korney, vladamir)\nHydrolyze(cob, korney) and not Deject(cob, vladamir) -> Hydrolyze(vladamir, cob)\nforall x (Cushioned(x) and not Twill(x, vladamir) -> not Cushioned(vladamir))\nforall x (Witty(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Twill(x, korney) -> Witty(korney))\nforall x (Deject(x, korney) -> not Witty(x))\nforall x (Twill(x, cob) and not Deject(cob, korney) -> not Unservile(x))\n\nConsuming(korney)\n\nTwill(agace, korney) and forall x (Twill(x, korney) -> Witty(korney)) -> therefore Witty(korney) Witty(korney) and forall x (Witty(x) -> Consuming(x)) -> therefore Consuming(korney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The fyodor pencil the celle. The kala couch the celie. The kala does not like the fyodor. The celle forearm the fyodor. The celle forearm the kala. The celle forearm the celie. The celle pencil the kala. The celle pencil the celie. The celie does not eat the celle. The celie is dyspeptic. The celie is moveable. The celie pencil the kala. If the fyodor couch the celie and the fyodor does not like the kala then the kala couch the fyodor. If someone is dyspeptic and they do not eat the kala then the kala is not dyspeptic. If someone is irrational then they are unplowed. If someone forearm the celie then the celie is irrational. If someone pencil the celie then they are not irrational. If someone forearm the fyodor and the fyodor does not like the celie then they are not moveable. The celie is not unplowed.", "logic": "\nPencil(fyodor, celle)\nCouch(kala, celie)\nnot Pencil(kala, fyodor)\nForearm(celle, fyodor)\nForearm(celle, kala)\nForearm(celle, celie)\nPencil(celle, kala)\nPencil(celle, celie)\nnot Forearm(celie, celle)\nDyspeptic(celie)\nMoveable(celie)\nPencil(celie, kala)\nCouch(fyodor, celie) and not Pencil(fyodor, kala) -> Couch(kala, fyodor)\nforall x (Dyspeptic(x) and not Forearm(x, kala) -> not Dyspeptic(kala))\nforall x (Irrational(x) -> Unplowed(x))\nforall x (Forearm(x, celie) -> Irrational(celie))\nforall x (Pencil(x, celie) -> not Irrational(x))\nforall x (Forearm(x, fyodor) and not Pencil(fyodor, celie) -> not Moveable(x))\n\nnot Unplowed(celie)\n\nForearm(celle, celie) and forall x (Forearm(x, celie) -> Irrational(celie)) -> therefore Irrational(celie) Irrational(celie) and forall x (Irrational(x) -> Unplowed(x)) -> therefore Unplowed(celie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The everett screw the hercule. The moina catcall the ramsey. The moina does not like the everett. The hercule sandpaper the everett. The hercule sandpaper the moina. The hercule sandpaper the ramsey. The hercule screw the moina. The hercule screw the ramsey. The ramsey does not eat the hercule. The ramsey is estimable. The ramsey is midway. The ramsey screw the moina. If the everett catcall the ramsey and the everett does not like the moina then the moina catcall the everett. If someone is estimable and they do not eat the moina then the moina is not estimable. If someone is deaf then they are adorned. If someone sandpaper the ramsey then the ramsey is deaf. If someone screw the ramsey then they are not deaf. If someone sandpaper the everett and the everett does not like the ramsey then they are not midway. The moina does not chase the everett.", "logic": "\nScrew(everett, hercule)\nCatcall(moina, ramsey)\nnot Screw(moina, everett)\nSandpaper(hercule, everett)\nSandpaper(hercule, moina)\nSandpaper(hercule, ramsey)\nScrew(hercule, moina)\nScrew(hercule, ramsey)\nnot Sandpaper(ramsey, hercule)\nEstimable(ramsey)\nMidway(ramsey)\nScrew(ramsey, moina)\nCatcall(everett, ramsey) and not Screw(everett, moina) -> Catcall(moina, everett)\nforall x (Estimable(x) and not Sandpaper(x, moina) -> not Estimable(moina))\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Adorned(x))\nforall x (Sandpaper(x, ramsey) -> Deaf(ramsey))\nforall x (Screw(x, ramsey) -> not Deaf(x))\nforall x (Sandpaper(x, everett) and not Screw(everett, ramsey) -> not Midway(x))\n\nnot Catcall(moina, everett)\n\nCatcall(everett, ramsey) and not Screw(everett, moina) -> Catcall(moina, everett) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The katlin type the dulci. The duane variegate the nicolea. The duane does not like the katlin. The dulci intubate the katlin. The dulci intubate the duane. The dulci intubate the nicolea. The dulci type the duane. The dulci type the nicolea. The nicolea does not eat the dulci. The nicolea is waterborne. The nicolea is oafish. The nicolea type the duane. If the katlin variegate the nicolea and the katlin does not like the duane then the duane variegate the katlin. If someone is waterborne and they do not eat the duane then the duane is not waterborne. If someone is avocado then they are forehand. If someone intubate the nicolea then the nicolea is avocado. If someone type the nicolea then they are not avocado. If someone intubate the katlin and the katlin does not like the nicolea then they are not oafish. The duane is forehand.", "logic": "\nType(katlin, dulci)\nVariegate(duane, nicolea)\nnot Type(duane, katlin)\nIntubate(dulci, katlin)\nIntubate(dulci, duane)\nIntubate(dulci, nicolea)\nType(dulci, duane)\nType(dulci, nicolea)\nnot Intubate(nicolea, dulci)\nWaterborne(nicolea)\nOafish(nicolea)\nType(nicolea, duane)\nVariegate(katlin, nicolea) and not Type(katlin, duane) -> Variegate(duane, katlin)\nforall x (Waterborne(x) and not Intubate(x, duane) -> not Waterborne(duane))\nforall x (Avocado(x) -> Forehand(x))\nforall x (Intubate(x, nicolea) -> Avocado(nicolea))\nforall x (Type(x, nicolea) -> not Avocado(x))\nforall x (Intubate(x, katlin) and not Type(katlin, nicolea) -> not Oafish(x))\n\nForehand(duane)\n\nforall x (Avocado(x) -> Forehand(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The marji rubberize the murial. The tray field the suzzy. The tray does not like the marji. The murial swell the marji. The murial swell the tray. The murial swell the suzzy. The murial rubberize the tray. The murial rubberize the suzzy. The suzzy does not eat the murial. The suzzy is executed. The suzzy is optimal. The suzzy rubberize the tray. If the marji field the suzzy and the marji does not like the tray then the tray field the marji. If someone is executed and they do not eat the tray then the tray is not executed. If someone is inveterate then they are augustan. If someone swell the suzzy then the suzzy is inveterate. If someone rubberize the suzzy then they are not inveterate. If someone swell the marji and the marji does not like the suzzy then they are not optimal. The marji is not augustan.", "logic": "\nRubberize(marji, murial)\nField(tray, suzzy)\nnot Rubberize(tray, marji)\nSwell(murial, marji)\nSwell(murial, tray)\nSwell(murial, suzzy)\nRubberize(murial, tray)\nRubberize(murial, suzzy)\nnot Swell(suzzy, murial)\nExecuted(suzzy)\nOptimal(suzzy)\nRubberize(suzzy, tray)\nField(marji, suzzy) and not Rubberize(marji, tray) -> Field(tray, marji)\nforall x (Executed(x) and not Swell(x, tray) -> not Executed(tray))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Augustan(x))\nforall x (Swell(x, suzzy) -> Inveterate(suzzy))\nforall x (Rubberize(x, suzzy) -> not Inveterate(x))\nforall x (Swell(x, marji) and not Rubberize(marji, suzzy) -> not Optimal(x))\n\nnot Augustan(marji)\n\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Augustan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The winifred burr the rafaelia. The amaleta mould the lorne. The amaleta does not like the winifred. The rafaelia recur the winifred. The rafaelia recur the amaleta. The rafaelia recur the lorne. The rafaelia burr the amaleta. The rafaelia burr the lorne. The lorne does not eat the rafaelia. The lorne is unclean. The lorne is absorbing. The lorne burr the amaleta. If the winifred mould the lorne and the winifred does not like the amaleta then the amaleta mould the winifred. If someone is unclean and they do not eat the amaleta then the amaleta is not unclean. If someone is pilary then they are undue. If someone recur the lorne then the lorne is pilary. If someone burr the lorne then they are not pilary. If someone recur the winifred and the winifred does not like the lorne then they are not absorbing. The winifred is pilary.", "logic": "\nBurr(winifred, rafaelia)\nMould(amaleta, lorne)\nnot Burr(amaleta, winifred)\nRecur(rafaelia, winifred)\nRecur(rafaelia, amaleta)\nRecur(rafaelia, lorne)\nBurr(rafaelia, amaleta)\nBurr(rafaelia, lorne)\nnot Recur(lorne, rafaelia)\nUnclean(lorne)\nAbsorbing(lorne)\nBurr(lorne, amaleta)\nMould(winifred, lorne) and not Burr(winifred, amaleta) -> Mould(amaleta, winifred)\nforall x (Unclean(x) and not Recur(x, amaleta) -> not Unclean(amaleta))\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Undue(x))\nforall x (Recur(x, lorne) -> Pilary(lorne))\nforall x (Burr(x, lorne) -> not Pilary(x))\nforall x (Recur(x, winifred) and not Burr(winifred, lorne) -> not Absorbing(x))\n\nPilary(winifred)\n\nPilary(winifred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The winston indicate the jackson. The franni dismay the ashish. The franni does not like the winston. The jackson satirise the winston. The jackson satirise the franni. The jackson satirise the ashish. The jackson indicate the franni. The jackson indicate the ashish. The ashish does not eat the jackson. The ashish is powdered. The ashish is bizarre. The ashish indicate the franni. If the winston dismay the ashish and the winston does not like the franni then the franni dismay the winston. If someone is powdered and they do not eat the franni then the franni is not powdered. If someone is infirm then they are quotidian. If someone satirise the ashish then the ashish is infirm. If someone indicate the ashish then they are not infirm. If someone satirise the winston and the winston does not like the ashish then they are not bizarre. The ashish does not like the jackson.", "logic": "\nIndicate(winston, jackson)\nDismay(franni, ashish)\nnot Indicate(franni, winston)\nSatirise(jackson, winston)\nSatirise(jackson, franni)\nSatirise(jackson, ashish)\nIndicate(jackson, franni)\nIndicate(jackson, ashish)\nnot Satirise(ashish, jackson)\nPowdered(ashish)\nBizarre(ashish)\nIndicate(ashish, franni)\nDismay(winston, ashish) and not Indicate(winston, franni) -> Dismay(franni, winston)\nforall x (Powdered(x) and not Satirise(x, franni) -> not Powdered(franni))\nforall x (Infirm(x) -> Quotidian(x))\nforall x (Satirise(x, ashish) -> Infirm(ashish))\nforall x (Indicate(x, ashish) -> not Infirm(x))\nforall x (Satirise(x, winston) and not Indicate(winston, ashish) -> not Bizarre(x))\n\nnot Indicate(ashish, jackson)\n\nnot Indicate(ashish, jackson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The breanne concrete the adelice. The cherey electrify the taite. The cherey does not like the breanne. The adelice scant the breanne. The adelice scant the cherey. The adelice scant the taite. The adelice concrete the cherey. The adelice concrete the taite. The taite does not eat the adelice. The taite is relaxed. The taite is steady. The taite concrete the cherey. If the breanne electrify the taite and the breanne does not like the cherey then the cherey electrify the breanne. If someone is relaxed and they do not eat the cherey then the cherey is not relaxed. If someone is spongelike then they are crinkly. If someone scant the taite then the taite is spongelike. If someone concrete the taite then they are not spongelike. If someone scant the breanne and the breanne does not like the taite then they are not steady. The cherey is steady.", "logic": "\nConcrete(breanne, adelice)\nElectrify(cherey, taite)\nnot Concrete(cherey, breanne)\nScant(adelice, breanne)\nScant(adelice, cherey)\nScant(adelice, taite)\nConcrete(adelice, cherey)\nConcrete(adelice, taite)\nnot Scant(taite, adelice)\nRelaxed(taite)\nSteady(taite)\nConcrete(taite, cherey)\nElectrify(breanne, taite) and not Concrete(breanne, cherey) -> Electrify(cherey, breanne)\nforall x (Relaxed(x) and not Scant(x, cherey) -> not Relaxed(cherey))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) -> Crinkly(x))\nforall x (Scant(x, taite) -> Spongelike(taite))\nforall x (Concrete(x, taite) -> not Spongelike(x))\nforall x (Scant(x, breanne) and not Concrete(breanne, taite) -> not Steady(x))\n\nSteady(cherey)\n\nSteady(cherey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-898"} {"premises": "The karil jitterbug the jennie. The jennie confine the rajeev. The rajeev is lone. The ruddie is sloping. If something is lone then it confine the ruddie. If something confine the ruddie then the ruddie is prurient. If something is prurient then it confine the jennie. The karil jitterbug the jennie.", "logic": "\nJitterbug(karil, jennie)\nConfine(jennie, rajeev)\nLone(rajeev)\nSloping(ruddie)\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Confine(x, ruddie))\nforall x (Confine(x, ruddie) -> Prurient(ruddie))\nforall x (Prurient(x) -> Confine(x, jennie))\n\nJitterbug(karil, jennie)\n\ntherefore Jitterbug(karil, jennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The eric velcro the sarena. The sarena assault the elden. The elden is overladen. The celestine is adjunctive. If something is overladen then it assault the celestine. If something assault the celestine then the celestine is unshakable. If something is unshakable then it assault the sarena. The sarena does not need the elden.", "logic": "\nVelcro(eric, sarena)\nAssault(sarena, elden)\nOverladen(elden)\nAdjunctive(celestine)\nforall x (Overladen(x) -> Assault(x, celestine))\nforall x (Assault(x, celestine) -> Unshakable(celestine))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) -> Assault(x, sarena))\n\nnot Assault(sarena, elden)\n\ntherefore Assault(sarena, elden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The rozele kick the lesli. The lesli plague the jill. The jill is orchestral. The lemuel is invasive. If something is orchestral then it plague the lemuel. If something plague the lemuel then the lemuel is patented. If something is patented then it plague the lesli. The jill plague the lemuel.", "logic": "\nKick(rozele, lesli)\nPlague(lesli, jill)\nOrchestral(jill)\nInvasive(lemuel)\nforall x (Orchestral(x) -> Plague(x, lemuel))\nforall x (Plague(x, lemuel) -> Patented(lemuel))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Plague(x, lesli))\n\nPlague(jill, lemuel)\n\nOrchestral(jill) and forall x (Orchestral(x) -> Plague(x, lemuel)) -> therefore Plague(jill, lemuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The matthew shin the meggy. The meggy scarper the eunice. The eunice is pedigreed. The peyter is rhenish. If something is pedigreed then it scarper the peyter. If something scarper the peyter then the peyter is unrelaxed. If something is unrelaxed then it scarper the meggy. The eunice does not need the peyter.", "logic": "\nShin(matthew, meggy)\nScarper(meggy, eunice)\nPedigreed(eunice)\nRhenish(peyter)\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Scarper(x, peyter))\nforall x (Scarper(x, peyter) -> Unrelaxed(peyter))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) -> Scarper(x, meggy))\n\nnot Scarper(eunice, peyter)\n\nPedigreed(eunice) and forall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Scarper(x, peyter)) -> therefore Scarper(eunice, peyter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The sandro rocket the elwood. The elwood subsist the leonhard. The leonhard is unsuitable. The ardella is hindoo. If something is unsuitable then it subsist the ardella. If something subsist the ardella then the ardella is chiliastic. If something is chiliastic then it subsist the elwood. The ardella is chiliastic.", "logic": "\nRocket(sandro, elwood)\nSubsist(elwood, leonhard)\nUnsuitable(leonhard)\nHindoo(ardella)\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Subsist(x, ardella))\nforall x (Subsist(x, ardella) -> Chiliastic(ardella))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) -> Subsist(x, elwood))\n\nChiliastic(ardella)\n\nUnsuitable(leonhard) and forall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Subsist(x, ardella)) -> therefore Subsist(leonhard, ardella) Subsist(leonhard, ardella) and forall x (Subsist(x, ardella) -> Chiliastic(ardella)) -> therefore Chiliastic(ardella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The hope color the beth. The beth gelatinise the delora. The delora is autoecious. The una is uptight. If something is autoecious then it gelatinise the una. If something gelatinise the una then the una is anurous. If something is anurous then it gelatinise the beth. The una is not anurous.", "logic": "\nColor(hope, beth)\nGelatinise(beth, delora)\nAutoecious(delora)\nUptight(una)\nforall x (Autoecious(x) -> Gelatinise(x, una))\nforall x (Gelatinise(x, una) -> Anurous(una))\nforall x (Anurous(x) -> Gelatinise(x, beth))\n\nnot Anurous(una)\n\nAutoecious(delora) and forall x (Autoecious(x) -> Gelatinise(x, una)) -> therefore Gelatinise(delora, una) Gelatinise(delora, una) and forall x (Gelatinise(x, una) -> Anurous(una)) -> therefore Anurous(una)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The mikel utilize the sully. The sully uproot the lancelot. The lancelot is hittite. The rusty is autotomic. If something is hittite then it uproot the rusty. If something uproot the rusty then the rusty is kampuchean. If something is kampuchean then it uproot the sully. The lancelot does not need the sully.", "logic": "\nUtilize(mikel, sully)\nUproot(sully, lancelot)\nHittite(lancelot)\nAutotomic(rusty)\nforall x (Hittite(x) -> Uproot(x, rusty))\nforall x (Uproot(x, rusty) -> Kampuchean(rusty))\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Uproot(x, sully))\n\nnot Uproot(lancelot, sully)\n\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Uproot(x, sully)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The erhard castle the luke. The luke galumph the garnette. The garnette is gallican. The dorothea is uniformed. If something is gallican then it galumph the dorothea. If something galumph the dorothea then the dorothea is focussed. If something is focussed then it galumph the luke. The luke galumph the luke.", "logic": "\nCastle(erhard, luke)\nGalumph(luke, garnette)\nGallican(garnette)\nUniformed(dorothea)\nforall x (Gallican(x) -> Galumph(x, dorothea))\nforall x (Galumph(x, dorothea) -> Focussed(dorothea))\nforall x (Focussed(x) -> Galumph(x, luke))\n\nGalumph(luke, luke)\n\nforall x (Focussed(x) -> Galumph(x, luke)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The jonis alter the daryn. The daryn closure the rafaelia. The rafaelia is autarkical. The shel is treeless. If something is autarkical then it closure the shel. If something closure the shel then the shel is pierced. If something is pierced then it closure the daryn. The jonis does not need the daryn.", "logic": "\nAlter(jonis, daryn)\nClosure(daryn, rafaelia)\nAutarkical(rafaelia)\nTreeless(shel)\nforall x (Autarkical(x) -> Closure(x, shel))\nforall x (Closure(x, shel) -> Pierced(shel))\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Closure(x, daryn))\n\nnot Closure(jonis, daryn)\n\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Closure(x, daryn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The saraann embrace the catherin. The catherin randomize the debi. The debi is amaurotic. The salomon is ascetic. If something is amaurotic then it randomize the salomon. If something randomize the salomon then the salomon is appetitive. If something is appetitive then it randomize the catherin. The saraann likes the catherin.", "logic": "\nEmbrace(saraann, catherin)\nRandomize(catherin, debi)\nAmaurotic(debi)\nAscetic(salomon)\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) -> Randomize(x, salomon))\nforall x (Randomize(x, salomon) -> Appetitive(salomon))\nforall x (Appetitive(x) -> Randomize(x, catherin))\n\nLikes(saraann, catherin)\n\nLikes(saraann, catherin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The freemon hinder the britaney. The britaney glitter the georgia. The georgia is fluky. The petey is morganatic. If something is fluky then it glitter the petey. If something glitter the petey then the petey is recessed. If something is recessed then it glitter the britaney. The britaney does not like the britaney.", "logic": "\nHinder(freemon, britaney)\nGlitter(britaney, georgia)\nFluky(georgia)\nMorganatic(petey)\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Glitter(x, petey))\nforall x (Glitter(x, petey) -> Recessed(petey))\nforall x (Recessed(x) -> Glitter(x, britaney))\n\nnot Likes(britaney, britaney)\n\nnot Likes(britaney, britaney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The violante hurry the sholom. The sholom wharf the zachary. The zachary is wound. The anna is spirituous. If something is wound then it wharf the anna. If something wharf the anna then the anna is intrastate. If something is intrastate then it wharf the sholom. The sholom is young.", "logic": "\nHurry(violante, sholom)\nWharf(sholom, zachary)\nWound(zachary)\nSpirituous(anna)\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Wharf(x, anna))\nforall x (Wharf(x, anna) -> Intrastate(anna))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) -> Wharf(x, sholom))\n\nYoung(sholom)\n\nYoung(sholom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-248"} {"premises": "The boris empathize the krissy. The boris is speakable. The boris is doctrinal. The boris is scrubby. The boris revive the krissy. The boris namedrop the krissy. The krissy is speakable. The krissy is scrubby. The krissy revive the boris. The krissy namedrop the boris. If something namedrop the boris then it empathize the boris. If something revive the boris then it revive the krissy. All scrubby things are speakable. If something namedrop the krissy then the krissy revive the boris. If something empathize the boris then it is scoreless. If something namedrop the boris then it is doctrinal. The boris is scrubby.", "logic": "\nEmpathize(boris, krissy)\nSpeakable(boris)\nDoctrinal(boris)\nScrubby(boris)\nRevive(boris, krissy)\nNamedrop(boris, krissy)\nSpeakable(krissy)\nScrubby(krissy)\nRevive(krissy, boris)\nNamedrop(krissy, boris)\nforall x (Namedrop(x, boris) -> Empathize(x, boris))\nforall x (Revive(x, boris) -> Revive(x, krissy))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Speakable(x))\nforall x (Namedrop(x, krissy) -> Revive(krissy, boris))\nforall x (Empathize(x, boris) -> Scoreless(x))\nforall x (Namedrop(x, boris) -> Doctrinal(x))\n\nScrubby(boris)\n\ntherefore Scrubby(boris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The kendal intumesce the renelle. The kendal is redbrick. The kendal is polluted. The kendal is unformed. The kendal veneer the renelle. The kendal nest the renelle. The renelle is redbrick. The renelle is unformed. The renelle veneer the kendal. The renelle nest the kendal. If something nest the kendal then it intumesce the kendal. If something veneer the kendal then it veneer the renelle. All unformed things are redbrick. If something nest the renelle then the renelle veneer the kendal. If something intumesce the kendal then it is catalytic. If something nest the kendal then it is polluted. The kendal is not polluted.", "logic": "\nIntumesce(kendal, renelle)\nRedbrick(kendal)\nPolluted(kendal)\nUnformed(kendal)\nVeneer(kendal, renelle)\nNest(kendal, renelle)\nRedbrick(renelle)\nUnformed(renelle)\nVeneer(renelle, kendal)\nNest(renelle, kendal)\nforall x (Nest(x, kendal) -> Intumesce(x, kendal))\nforall x (Veneer(x, kendal) -> Veneer(x, renelle))\nforall x (Unformed(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Nest(x, renelle) -> Veneer(renelle, kendal))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, kendal) -> Catalytic(x))\nforall x (Nest(x, kendal) -> Polluted(x))\n\nnot Polluted(kendal)\n\ntherefore Polluted(kendal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The jule execute the roana. The jule is writhed. The jule is waning. The jule is private. The jule devaluate the roana. The jule validate the roana. The roana is writhed. The roana is private. The roana devaluate the jule. The roana validate the jule. If something validate the jule then it execute the jule. If something devaluate the jule then it devaluate the roana. All private things are writhed. If something validate the roana then the roana devaluate the jule. If something execute the jule then it is butyric. If something validate the jule then it is waning. The roana devaluate the roana.", "logic": "\nExecute(jule, roana)\nWrithed(jule)\nWaning(jule)\nPrivate(jule)\nDevaluate(jule, roana)\nValidate(jule, roana)\nWrithed(roana)\nPrivate(roana)\nDevaluate(roana, jule)\nValidate(roana, jule)\nforall x (Validate(x, jule) -> Execute(x, jule))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, jule) -> Devaluate(x, roana))\nforall x (Private(x) -> Writhed(x))\nforall x (Validate(x, roana) -> Devaluate(roana, jule))\nforall x (Execute(x, jule) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Validate(x, jule) -> Waning(x))\n\nDevaluate(roana, roana)\n\nDevaluate(roana, jule) and forall x (Devaluate(x, jule) -> Devaluate(x, roana)) -> therefore Devaluate(roana, roana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The elinor aphorise the wittie. The elinor is bonny. The elinor is chief. The elinor is plausible. The elinor necrose the wittie. The elinor deregulate the wittie. The wittie is bonny. The wittie is plausible. The wittie necrose the elinor. The wittie deregulate the elinor. If something deregulate the elinor then it aphorise the elinor. If something necrose the elinor then it necrose the wittie. All plausible things are bonny. If something deregulate the wittie then the wittie necrose the elinor. If something aphorise the elinor then it is iridic. If something deregulate the elinor then it is chief. The wittie is not chief.", "logic": "\nAphorise(elinor, wittie)\nBonny(elinor)\nChief(elinor)\nPlausible(elinor)\nNecrose(elinor, wittie)\nDeregulate(elinor, wittie)\nBonny(wittie)\nPlausible(wittie)\nNecrose(wittie, elinor)\nDeregulate(wittie, elinor)\nforall x (Deregulate(x, elinor) -> Aphorise(x, elinor))\nforall x (Necrose(x, elinor) -> Necrose(x, wittie))\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> Bonny(x))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, wittie) -> Necrose(wittie, elinor))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, elinor) -> Iridic(x))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, elinor) -> Chief(x))\n\nnot Chief(wittie)\n\nDeregulate(wittie, elinor) and forall x (Deregulate(x, elinor) -> Chief(x)) -> therefore Chief(wittie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The smith dialyse the langston. The smith is imputable. The smith is impassable. The smith is presbyopic. The smith shag the langston. The smith harbour the langston. The langston is imputable. The langston is presbyopic. The langston shag the smith. The langston harbour the smith. If something harbour the smith then it dialyse the smith. If something shag the smith then it shag the langston. All presbyopic things are imputable. If something harbour the langston then the langston shag the smith. If something dialyse the smith then it is buttonlike. If something harbour the smith then it is impassable. The langston is buttonlike.", "logic": "\nDialyse(smith, langston)\nImputable(smith)\nImpassable(smith)\nPresbyopic(smith)\nShag(smith, langston)\nHarbour(smith, langston)\nImputable(langston)\nPresbyopic(langston)\nShag(langston, smith)\nHarbour(langston, smith)\nforall x (Harbour(x, smith) -> Dialyse(x, smith))\nforall x (Shag(x, smith) -> Shag(x, langston))\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) -> Imputable(x))\nforall x (Harbour(x, langston) -> Shag(langston, smith))\nforall x (Dialyse(x, smith) -> Buttonlike(x))\nforall x (Harbour(x, smith) -> Impassable(x))\n\nButtonlike(langston)\n\nHarbour(langston, smith) and forall x (Harbour(x, smith) -> Dialyse(x, smith)) -> therefore Dialyse(langston, smith) Dialyse(langston, smith) and forall x (Dialyse(x, smith) -> Buttonlike(x)) -> therefore Buttonlike(langston)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The malena resolve the henderson. The malena is unfounded. The malena is rewardful. The malena is nameless. The malena bone the henderson. The malena disaccord the henderson. The henderson is unfounded. The henderson is nameless. The henderson bone the malena. The henderson disaccord the malena. If something disaccord the malena then it resolve the malena. If something bone the malena then it bone the henderson. All nameless things are unfounded. If something disaccord the henderson then the henderson bone the malena. If something resolve the malena then it is uveal. If something disaccord the malena then it is rewardful. The henderson is not uveal.", "logic": "\nResolve(malena, henderson)\nUnfounded(malena)\nRewardful(malena)\nNameless(malena)\nBone(malena, henderson)\nDisaccord(malena, henderson)\nUnfounded(henderson)\nNameless(henderson)\nBone(henderson, malena)\nDisaccord(henderson, malena)\nforall x (Disaccord(x, malena) -> Resolve(x, malena))\nforall x (Bone(x, malena) -> Bone(x, henderson))\nforall x (Nameless(x) -> Unfounded(x))\nforall x (Disaccord(x, henderson) -> Bone(henderson, malena))\nforall x (Resolve(x, malena) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Disaccord(x, malena) -> Rewardful(x))\n\nnot Uveal(henderson)\n\nDisaccord(henderson, malena) and forall x (Disaccord(x, malena) -> Resolve(x, malena)) -> therefore Resolve(henderson, malena) Resolve(henderson, malena) and forall x (Resolve(x, malena) -> Uveal(x)) -> therefore Uveal(henderson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The elva fire the darius. The elva is ready. The elva is geniculate. The elva is monthlong. The elva crock the darius. The elva lounge the darius. The darius is ready. The darius is monthlong. The darius crock the elva. The darius lounge the elva. If something lounge the elva then it fire the elva. If something crock the elva then it crock the darius. All monthlong things are ready. If something lounge the darius then the darius crock the elva. If something fire the elva then it is elfin. If something lounge the elva then it is geniculate. The elva is not elfin.", "logic": "\nFire(elva, darius)\nReady(elva)\nGeniculate(elva)\nMonthlong(elva)\nCrock(elva, darius)\nLounge(elva, darius)\nReady(darius)\nMonthlong(darius)\nCrock(darius, elva)\nLounge(darius, elva)\nforall x (Lounge(x, elva) -> Fire(x, elva))\nforall x (Crock(x, elva) -> Crock(x, darius))\nforall x (Monthlong(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Lounge(x, darius) -> Crock(darius, elva))\nforall x (Fire(x, elva) -> Elfin(x))\nforall x (Lounge(x, elva) -> Geniculate(x))\n\nnot Elfin(elva)\n\nforall x (Fire(x, elva) -> Elfin(x)) <- forall x (Lounge(x, elva) -> Fire(x, elva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The louise neighbor the ibby. The louise is renal. The louise is wheezing. The louise is nonprofit. The louise vowelise the ibby. The louise cowl the ibby. The ibby is renal. The ibby is nonprofit. The ibby vowelise the louise. The ibby cowl the louise. If something cowl the louise then it neighbor the louise. If something vowelise the louise then it vowelise the ibby. All nonprofit things are renal. If something cowl the ibby then the ibby vowelise the louise. If something neighbor the louise then it is exegetical. If something cowl the louise then it is wheezing. The louise neighbor the louise.", "logic": "\nNeighbor(louise, ibby)\nRenal(louise)\nWheezing(louise)\nNonprofit(louise)\nVowelise(louise, ibby)\nCowl(louise, ibby)\nRenal(ibby)\nNonprofit(ibby)\nVowelise(ibby, louise)\nCowl(ibby, louise)\nforall x (Cowl(x, louise) -> Neighbor(x, louise))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, louise) -> Vowelise(x, ibby))\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) -> Renal(x))\nforall x (Cowl(x, ibby) -> Vowelise(ibby, louise))\nforall x (Neighbor(x, louise) -> Exegetical(x))\nforall x (Cowl(x, louise) -> Wheezing(x))\n\nNeighbor(louise, louise)\n\nforall x (Cowl(x, louise) -> Neighbor(x, louise)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The jeanette recycle the lenette. The jeanette is murdered. The jeanette is effulgent. The jeanette is jihadi. The jeanette reap the lenette. The jeanette toll the lenette. The lenette is murdered. The lenette is jihadi. The lenette reap the jeanette. The lenette toll the jeanette. If something toll the jeanette then it recycle the jeanette. If something reap the jeanette then it reap the lenette. All jihadi things are murdered. If something toll the lenette then the lenette reap the jeanette. If something recycle the jeanette then it is nebular. If something toll the jeanette then it is effulgent. The jeanette does not like the jeanette.", "logic": "\nRecycle(jeanette, lenette)\nMurdered(jeanette)\nEffulgent(jeanette)\nJihadi(jeanette)\nReap(jeanette, lenette)\nToll(jeanette, lenette)\nMurdered(lenette)\nJihadi(lenette)\nReap(lenette, jeanette)\nToll(lenette, jeanette)\nforall x (Toll(x, jeanette) -> Recycle(x, jeanette))\nforall x (Reap(x, jeanette) -> Reap(x, lenette))\nforall x (Jihadi(x) -> Murdered(x))\nforall x (Toll(x, lenette) -> Reap(lenette, jeanette))\nforall x (Recycle(x, jeanette) -> Nebular(x))\nforall x (Toll(x, jeanette) -> Effulgent(x))\n\nnot Reap(jeanette, jeanette)\n\nnot Reap(jeanette, jeanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The chariot forswear the arleta. The chariot is overfond. The chariot is supposed. The chariot is zymolytic. The chariot swob the arleta. The chariot unplug the arleta. The arleta is overfond. The arleta is zymolytic. The arleta swob the chariot. The arleta unplug the chariot. If something unplug the chariot then it forswear the chariot. If something swob the chariot then it swob the arleta. All zymolytic things are overfond. If something unplug the arleta then the arleta swob the chariot. If something forswear the chariot then it is anomic. If something unplug the chariot then it is supposed. The chariot is rough.", "logic": "\nForswear(chariot, arleta)\nOverfond(chariot)\nSupposed(chariot)\nZymolytic(chariot)\nSwob(chariot, arleta)\nUnplug(chariot, arleta)\nOverfond(arleta)\nZymolytic(arleta)\nSwob(arleta, chariot)\nUnplug(arleta, chariot)\nforall x (Unplug(x, chariot) -> Forswear(x, chariot))\nforall x (Swob(x, chariot) -> Swob(x, arleta))\nforall x (Zymolytic(x) -> Overfond(x))\nforall x (Unplug(x, arleta) -> Swob(arleta, chariot))\nforall x (Forswear(x, chariot) -> Anomic(x))\nforall x (Unplug(x, chariot) -> Supposed(x))\n\nRough(chariot)\n\nRough(chariot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The estell menace the jared. The estell is braided. The estell is impartial. The estell is unnotched. The estell deflower the jared. The estell golf the jared. The jared is braided. The jared is unnotched. The jared deflower the estell. The jared golf the estell. If something golf the estell then it menace the estell. If something deflower the estell then it deflower the jared. All unnotched things are braided. If something golf the jared then the jared deflower the estell. If something menace the estell then it is unprepared. If something golf the estell then it is impartial. The jared does not eat the jared.", "logic": "\nMenace(estell, jared)\nBraided(estell)\nImpartial(estell)\nUnnotched(estell)\nDeflower(estell, jared)\nGolf(estell, jared)\nBraided(jared)\nUnnotched(jared)\nDeflower(jared, estell)\nGolf(jared, estell)\nforall x (Golf(x, estell) -> Menace(x, estell))\nforall x (Deflower(x, estell) -> Deflower(x, jared))\nforall x (Unnotched(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Golf(x, jared) -> Deflower(jared, estell))\nforall x (Menace(x, estell) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Golf(x, estell) -> Impartial(x))\n\nnot Menace(jared, jared)\n\nnot Menace(jared, jared) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The mara muck the mickie. The mara is plummy. The mara is rumanian. The mara is junoesque. The mara honeymoon the mickie. The mara flyfish the mickie. The mickie is plummy. The mickie is junoesque. The mickie honeymoon the mara. The mickie flyfish the mara. If something flyfish the mara then it muck the mara. If something honeymoon the mara then it honeymoon the mickie. All junoesque things are plummy. If something flyfish the mickie then the mickie honeymoon the mara. If something muck the mara then it is pastel. If something flyfish the mara then it is rumanian. The mickie flyfish the mickie.", "logic": "\nMuck(mara, mickie)\nPlummy(mara)\nRumanian(mara)\nJunoesque(mara)\nHoneymoon(mara, mickie)\nFlyfish(mara, mickie)\nPlummy(mickie)\nJunoesque(mickie)\nHoneymoon(mickie, mara)\nFlyfish(mickie, mara)\nforall x (Flyfish(x, mara) -> Muck(x, mara))\nforall x (Honeymoon(x, mara) -> Honeymoon(x, mickie))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Plummy(x))\nforall x (Flyfish(x, mickie) -> Honeymoon(mickie, mara))\nforall x (Muck(x, mara) -> Pastel(x))\nforall x (Flyfish(x, mara) -> Rumanian(x))\n\nFlyfish(mickie, mickie)\n\nFlyfish(mickie, mickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-983"} {"premises": "The aharon ingratiate the mervin. The aharon stun the mart. The mart is puff. The mart is waxy. The mart stun the mervin. The mervin is combative. The mervin stun the aharon. If something indicate the mart and the mart ingratiate the aharon then it does not eat the mervin. If something ingratiate the aharon then it stun the aharon. If something ingratiate the mervin then it ingratiate the aharon. The mart stun the mervin.", "logic": "\nIngratiate(aharon, mervin)\nStun(aharon, mart)\nPuff(mart)\nWaxy(mart)\nStun(mart, mervin)\nCombative(mervin)\nStun(mervin, aharon)\nforall x (Indicate(x, mart) and Ingratiate(mart, aharon) -> not Indicate(x, mervin))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, aharon) -> Stun(x, aharon))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, mervin) -> Ingratiate(x, aharon))\n\nStun(mart, mervin)\n\ntherefore Stun(mart, mervin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The fortuna swoop the vanni. The fortuna build the cally. The cally is thickening. The cally is carpeted. The cally build the vanni. The vanni is couthie. The vanni build the fortuna. If something bowl the cally and the cally swoop the fortuna then it does not eat the vanni. If something swoop the fortuna then it build the fortuna. If something swoop the vanni then it swoop the fortuna. The vanni is not couthie.", "logic": "\nSwoop(fortuna, vanni)\nBuild(fortuna, cally)\nThickening(cally)\nCarpeted(cally)\nBuild(cally, vanni)\nCouthie(vanni)\nBuild(vanni, fortuna)\nforall x (Bowl(x, cally) and Swoop(cally, fortuna) -> not Bowl(x, vanni))\nforall x (Swoop(x, fortuna) -> Build(x, fortuna))\nforall x (Swoop(x, vanni) -> Swoop(x, fortuna))\n\nnot Couthie(vanni)\n\ntherefore Couthie(vanni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The madona syphon the nara. The madona rebut the desmond. The desmond is ribald. The desmond is fuscous. The desmond rebut the nara. The nara is extra. The nara rebut the madona. If something inflame the desmond and the desmond syphon the madona then it does not eat the nara. If something syphon the madona then it rebut the madona. If something syphon the nara then it syphon the madona. The madona syphon the madona.", "logic": "\nSyphon(madona, nara)\nRebut(madona, desmond)\nRibald(desmond)\nFuscous(desmond)\nRebut(desmond, nara)\nExtra(nara)\nRebut(nara, madona)\nforall x (Inflame(x, desmond) and Syphon(desmond, madona) -> not Inflame(x, nara))\nforall x (Syphon(x, madona) -> Rebut(x, madona))\nforall x (Syphon(x, nara) -> Syphon(x, madona))\n\nSyphon(madona, madona)\n\nSyphon(madona, nara) and forall x (Syphon(x, nara) -> Syphon(x, madona)) -> therefore Syphon(madona, madona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The adrien bacterize the yacov. The adrien metabolise the odele. The odele is shrieked. The odele is bullish. The odele metabolise the yacov. The yacov is tangible. The yacov metabolise the adrien. If something group the odele and the odele bacterize the adrien then it does not eat the yacov. If something bacterize the adrien then it metabolise the adrien. If something bacterize the yacov then it bacterize the adrien. The adrien does not chase the adrien.", "logic": "\nBacterize(adrien, yacov)\nMetabolise(adrien, odele)\nShrieked(odele)\nBullish(odele)\nMetabolise(odele, yacov)\nTangible(yacov)\nMetabolise(yacov, adrien)\nforall x (Group(x, odele) and Bacterize(odele, adrien) -> not Group(x, yacov))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, adrien) -> Metabolise(x, adrien))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, yacov) -> Bacterize(x, adrien))\n\nnot Bacterize(adrien, adrien)\n\nBacterize(adrien, yacov) and forall x (Bacterize(x, yacov) -> Bacterize(x, adrien)) -> therefore Bacterize(adrien, adrien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The blakeley doff the heath. The blakeley pioneer the hilton. The hilton is flashy. The hilton is marshy. The hilton pioneer the heath. The heath is frustrated. The heath pioneer the blakeley. If something imply the hilton and the hilton doff the blakeley then it does not eat the heath. If something doff the blakeley then it pioneer the blakeley. If something doff the heath then it doff the blakeley. The blakeley pioneer the blakeley.", "logic": "\nDoff(blakeley, heath)\nPioneer(blakeley, hilton)\nFlashy(hilton)\nMarshy(hilton)\nPioneer(hilton, heath)\nFrustrated(heath)\nPioneer(heath, blakeley)\nforall x (Imply(x, hilton) and Doff(hilton, blakeley) -> not Imply(x, heath))\nforall x (Doff(x, blakeley) -> Pioneer(x, blakeley))\nforall x (Doff(x, heath) -> Doff(x, blakeley))\n\nPioneer(blakeley, blakeley)\n\nDoff(blakeley, heath) and forall x (Doff(x, heath) -> Doff(x, blakeley)) -> therefore Doff(blakeley, blakeley) Doff(blakeley, blakeley) and forall x (Doff(x, blakeley) -> Pioneer(x, blakeley)) -> therefore Pioneer(blakeley, blakeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The waleed cradle the susi. The waleed disavow the jefferson. The jefferson is provincial. The jefferson is entozoan. The jefferson disavow the susi. The susi is expandable. The susi disavow the waleed. If something boomerang the jefferson and the jefferson cradle the waleed then it does not eat the susi. If something cradle the waleed then it disavow the waleed. If something cradle the susi then it cradle the waleed. The waleed does not need the waleed.", "logic": "\nCradle(waleed, susi)\nDisavow(waleed, jefferson)\nProvincial(jefferson)\nEntozoan(jefferson)\nDisavow(jefferson, susi)\nExpandable(susi)\nDisavow(susi, waleed)\nforall x (Boomerang(x, jefferson) and Cradle(jefferson, waleed) -> not Boomerang(x, susi))\nforall x (Cradle(x, waleed) -> Disavow(x, waleed))\nforall x (Cradle(x, susi) -> Cradle(x, waleed))\n\nnot Disavow(waleed, waleed)\n\nCradle(waleed, susi) and forall x (Cradle(x, susi) -> Cradle(x, waleed)) -> therefore Cradle(waleed, waleed) Cradle(waleed, waleed) and forall x (Cradle(x, waleed) -> Disavow(x, waleed)) -> therefore Disavow(waleed, waleed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The stefa skim the melantha. The stefa levant the terese. The terese is nonhairy. The terese is sketchy. The terese levant the melantha. The melantha is inaccurate. The melantha levant the stefa. If something braid the terese and the terese skim the stefa then it does not eat the melantha. If something skim the stefa then it levant the stefa. If something skim the melantha then it skim the stefa. The terese does not chase the stefa.", "logic": "\nSkim(stefa, melantha)\nLevant(stefa, terese)\nNonhairy(terese)\nSketchy(terese)\nLevant(terese, melantha)\nInaccurate(melantha)\nLevant(melantha, stefa)\nforall x (Braid(x, terese) and Skim(terese, stefa) -> not Braid(x, melantha))\nforall x (Skim(x, stefa) -> Levant(x, stefa))\nforall x (Skim(x, melantha) -> Skim(x, stefa))\n\nnot Skim(terese, stefa)\n\nforall x (Skim(x, melantha) -> Skim(x, stefa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The herculie smut the lesley. The herculie foregather the estrella. The estrella is quelled. The estrella is unconfused. The estrella foregather the lesley. The lesley is cyprinid. The lesley foregather the herculie. If something intrude the estrella and the estrella smut the herculie then it does not eat the lesley. If something smut the herculie then it foregather the herculie. If something smut the lesley then it smut the herculie. The estrella foregather the herculie.", "logic": "\nSmut(herculie, lesley)\nForegather(herculie, estrella)\nQuelled(estrella)\nUnconfused(estrella)\nForegather(estrella, lesley)\nCyprinid(lesley)\nForegather(lesley, herculie)\nforall x (Intrude(x, estrella) and Smut(estrella, herculie) -> not Intrude(x, lesley))\nforall x (Smut(x, herculie) -> Foregather(x, herculie))\nforall x (Smut(x, lesley) -> Smut(x, herculie))\n\nForegather(estrella, herculie)\n\nforall x (Smut(x, herculie) -> Foregather(x, herculie)) <- forall x (Smut(x, lesley) -> Smut(x, herculie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The dunstan blunder the feodora. The dunstan underspend the whitby. The whitby is iffy. The whitby is diametric. The whitby underspend the feodora. The feodora is diametral. The feodora underspend the dunstan. If something rede the whitby and the whitby blunder the dunstan then it does not eat the feodora. If something blunder the dunstan then it underspend the dunstan. If something blunder the feodora then it blunder the dunstan. The feodora does not chase the dunstan.", "logic": "\nBlunder(dunstan, feodora)\nUnderspend(dunstan, whitby)\nIffy(whitby)\nDiametric(whitby)\nUnderspend(whitby, feodora)\nDiametral(feodora)\nUnderspend(feodora, dunstan)\nforall x (Rede(x, whitby) and Blunder(whitby, dunstan) -> not Rede(x, feodora))\nforall x (Blunder(x, dunstan) -> Underspend(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Blunder(x, feodora) -> Blunder(x, dunstan))\n\nnot Blunder(feodora, dunstan)\n\nforall x (Blunder(x, feodora) -> Blunder(x, dunstan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The dwight antiquate the jade. The dwight tongue the dorolisa. The dorolisa is mucinous. The dorolisa is overmodest. The dorolisa tongue the jade. The jade is realizable. The jade tongue the dwight. If something fornicate the dorolisa and the dorolisa antiquate the dwight then it does not eat the jade. If something antiquate the dwight then it tongue the dwight. If something antiquate the jade then it antiquate the dwight. The jade tongue the dorolisa.", "logic": "\nAntiquate(dwight, jade)\nTongue(dwight, dorolisa)\nMucinous(dorolisa)\nOvermodest(dorolisa)\nTongue(dorolisa, jade)\nRealizable(jade)\nTongue(jade, dwight)\nforall x (Fornicate(x, dorolisa) and Antiquate(dorolisa, dwight) -> not Fornicate(x, jade))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, dwight) -> Tongue(x, dwight))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, jade) -> Antiquate(x, dwight))\n\nTongue(jade, dorolisa)\n\nTongue(jade, dorolisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The junia abet the mavis. The junia remould the dora. The dora is hundred. The dora is unfaithful. The dora remould the mavis. The mavis is imbecilic. The mavis remould the junia. If something unlive the dora and the dora abet the junia then it does not eat the mavis. If something abet the junia then it remould the junia. If something abet the mavis then it abet the junia. The dora does not chase the mavis.", "logic": "\nAbet(junia, mavis)\nRemould(junia, dora)\nHundred(dora)\nUnfaithful(dora)\nRemould(dora, mavis)\nImbecilic(mavis)\nRemould(mavis, junia)\nforall x (Unlive(x, dora) and Abet(dora, junia) -> not Unlive(x, mavis))\nforall x (Abet(x, junia) -> Remould(x, junia))\nforall x (Abet(x, mavis) -> Abet(x, junia))\n\nnot Abet(dora, mavis)\n\nnot Abet(dora, mavis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The sofia bluster the wilone. The sofia doubt the webster. The webster is songful. The webster is shrill. The webster doubt the wilone. The wilone is weeny. The wilone doubt the sofia. If something drive the webster and the webster bluster the sofia then it does not eat the wilone. If something bluster the sofia then it doubt the sofia. If something bluster the wilone then it bluster the sofia. The sofia is weeny.", "logic": "\nBluster(sofia, wilone)\nDoubt(sofia, webster)\nSongful(webster)\nShrill(webster)\nDoubt(webster, wilone)\nWeeny(wilone)\nDoubt(wilone, sofia)\nforall x (Drive(x, webster) and Bluster(webster, sofia) -> not Drive(x, wilone))\nforall x (Bluster(x, sofia) -> Doubt(x, sofia))\nforall x (Bluster(x, wilone) -> Bluster(x, sofia))\n\nWeeny(sofia)\n\nWeeny(sofia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "Lesley is thrillful. Lesley is lentissimo. Prunella is exoergic. Prunella is thrillful. Prunella is hierarchal. Prunella is cairned. Wilson is exoergic. Wilson is thrillful. Wilson is affine. Wilson is hierarchal. Wilson is not cairned. Wilson is lentissimo. Madelina is not thrillful. Madelina is affine. Madelina is hierarchal. Madelina is cairned. If something is hierarchal and not thrillful then it is lentissimo. If something is cairned and affine then it is lentissimo. White, hierarchal things are exoergic. Wilson is thrillful.", "logic": "\nThrillful(lesley)\nLentissimo(lesley)\nExoergic(prunella)\nThrillful(prunella)\nHierarchal(prunella)\nCairned(prunella)\nExoergic(wilson)\nThrillful(wilson)\nAffine(wilson)\nHierarchal(wilson)\nnot Cairned(wilson)\nLentissimo(wilson)\nnot Thrillful(madelina)\nAffine(madelina)\nHierarchal(madelina)\nCairned(madelina)\nforall x (Hierarchal(x) and not Thrillful(x) -> Lentissimo(x))\nforall x (Cairned(x) and Affine(x) -> Lentissimo(x))\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) and Hierarchal(x) -> Exoergic(x))\n\nThrillful(wilson)\n\ntherefore Thrillful(wilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Kissee is unproved. Kissee is fugly. Gallagher is fulfilled. Gallagher is unproved. Gallagher is monthly. Gallagher is smashed. Hermon is fulfilled. Hermon is unproved. Hermon is mechanical. Hermon is monthly. Hermon is not smashed. Hermon is fugly. Meyer is not unproved. Meyer is mechanical. Meyer is monthly. Meyer is smashed. If something is monthly and not unproved then it is fugly. If something is smashed and mechanical then it is fugly. White, monthly things are fulfilled. Hermon is smashed.", "logic": "\nUnproved(kissee)\nFugly(kissee)\nFulfilled(gallagher)\nUnproved(gallagher)\nMonthly(gallagher)\nSmashed(gallagher)\nFulfilled(hermon)\nUnproved(hermon)\nMechanical(hermon)\nMonthly(hermon)\nnot Smashed(hermon)\nFugly(hermon)\nnot Unproved(meyer)\nMechanical(meyer)\nMonthly(meyer)\nSmashed(meyer)\nforall x (Monthly(x) and not Unproved(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Smashed(x) and Mechanical(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Fugly(x) and Monthly(x) -> Fulfilled(x))\n\nSmashed(hermon)\n\ntherefore not Smashed(hermon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Florry is arrayed. Florry is draughty. Wilbur is hungry. Wilbur is arrayed. Wilbur is wavering. Wilbur is resilient. Helmuth is hungry. Helmuth is arrayed. Helmuth is teentsy. Helmuth is wavering. Helmuth is not resilient. Helmuth is draughty. Tre is not arrayed. Tre is teentsy. Tre is wavering. Tre is resilient. If something is wavering and not arrayed then it is draughty. If something is resilient and teentsy then it is draughty. White, wavering things are hungry. Tre is draughty.", "logic": "\nArrayed(florry)\nDraughty(florry)\nHungry(wilbur)\nArrayed(wilbur)\nWavering(wilbur)\nResilient(wilbur)\nHungry(helmuth)\nArrayed(helmuth)\nTeentsy(helmuth)\nWavering(helmuth)\nnot Resilient(helmuth)\nDraughty(helmuth)\nnot Arrayed(tre)\nTeentsy(tre)\nWavering(tre)\nResilient(tre)\nforall x (Wavering(x) and not Arrayed(x) -> Draughty(x))\nforall x (Resilient(x) and Teentsy(x) -> Draughty(x))\nforall x (Draughty(x) and Wavering(x) -> Hungry(x))\n\nDraughty(tre)\n\nWavering(tre) and not Arrayed(tre) and forall x (Wavering(x) and not Arrayed(x) -> Draughty(x)) -> therefore Draughty(tre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Elliott is uppercase. Elliott is fungicidal. Inci is dimorphic. Inci is uppercase. Inci is gruelling. Inci is ungrateful. Maurice is dimorphic. Maurice is uppercase. Maurice is folksy. Maurice is gruelling. Maurice is not ungrateful. Maurice is fungicidal. Andrei is not uppercase. Andrei is folksy. Andrei is gruelling. Andrei is ungrateful. If something is gruelling and not uppercase then it is fungicidal. If something is ungrateful and folksy then it is fungicidal. White, gruelling things are dimorphic. Andrei is not fungicidal.", "logic": "\nUppercase(elliott)\nFungicidal(elliott)\nDimorphic(inci)\nUppercase(inci)\nGruelling(inci)\nUngrateful(inci)\nDimorphic(maurice)\nUppercase(maurice)\nFolksy(maurice)\nGruelling(maurice)\nnot Ungrateful(maurice)\nFungicidal(maurice)\nnot Uppercase(andrei)\nFolksy(andrei)\nGruelling(andrei)\nUngrateful(andrei)\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and not Uppercase(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) and Folksy(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) and Gruelling(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\n\nnot Fungicidal(andrei)\n\nGruelling(andrei) and not Uppercase(andrei) and forall x (Gruelling(x) and not Uppercase(x) -> Fungicidal(x)) -> therefore Fungicidal(andrei)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Waly is scholarly. Waly is nutritious. Benn is terrible. Benn is scholarly. Benn is dandy. Benn is homosexual. Aleen is terrible. Aleen is scholarly. Aleen is unsown. Aleen is dandy. Aleen is not homosexual. Aleen is nutritious. Ingeberg is not scholarly. Ingeberg is unsown. Ingeberg is dandy. Ingeberg is homosexual. If something is dandy and not scholarly then it is nutritious. If something is homosexual and unsown then it is nutritious. White, dandy things are terrible. Ingeberg is terrible.", "logic": "\nScholarly(waly)\nNutritious(waly)\nTerrible(benn)\nScholarly(benn)\nDandy(benn)\nHomosexual(benn)\nTerrible(aleen)\nScholarly(aleen)\nUnsown(aleen)\nDandy(aleen)\nnot Homosexual(aleen)\nNutritious(aleen)\nnot Scholarly(ingeberg)\nUnsown(ingeberg)\nDandy(ingeberg)\nHomosexual(ingeberg)\nforall x (Dandy(x) and not Scholarly(x) -> Nutritious(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Unsown(x) -> Nutritious(x))\nforall x (Nutritious(x) and Dandy(x) -> Terrible(x))\n\nTerrible(ingeberg)\n\nDandy(ingeberg) and not Scholarly(ingeberg) and forall x (Dandy(x) and not Scholarly(x) -> Nutritious(x)) -> therefore Nutritious(ingeberg) Nutritious(ingeberg) and Dandy(ingeberg) and forall x (Nutritious(x) and Dandy(x) -> Terrible(x)) -> therefore Terrible(ingeberg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Maryjane is cadenced. Maryjane is unsworn. Ellissa is undutiful. Ellissa is cadenced. Ellissa is overhanded. Ellissa is mephitic. Moses is undutiful. Moses is cadenced. Moses is rumpled. Moses is overhanded. Moses is not mephitic. Moses is unsworn. Sydelle is not cadenced. Sydelle is rumpled. Sydelle is overhanded. Sydelle is mephitic. If something is overhanded and not cadenced then it is unsworn. If something is mephitic and rumpled then it is unsworn. White, overhanded things are undutiful. Sydelle is not undutiful.", "logic": "\nCadenced(maryjane)\nUnsworn(maryjane)\nUndutiful(ellissa)\nCadenced(ellissa)\nOverhanded(ellissa)\nMephitic(ellissa)\nUndutiful(moses)\nCadenced(moses)\nRumpled(moses)\nOverhanded(moses)\nnot Mephitic(moses)\nUnsworn(moses)\nnot Cadenced(sydelle)\nRumpled(sydelle)\nOverhanded(sydelle)\nMephitic(sydelle)\nforall x (Overhanded(x) and not Cadenced(x) -> Unsworn(x))\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and Rumpled(x) -> Unsworn(x))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) and Overhanded(x) -> Undutiful(x))\n\nnot Undutiful(sydelle)\n\nOverhanded(sydelle) and not Cadenced(sydelle) and forall x (Overhanded(x) and not Cadenced(x) -> Unsworn(x)) -> therefore Unsworn(sydelle) Unsworn(sydelle) and Overhanded(sydelle) and forall x (Unsworn(x) and Overhanded(x) -> Undutiful(x)) -> therefore Undutiful(sydelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Katya is detersive. Katya is vendible. Derrick is epenthetic. Derrick is detersive. Derrick is repellent. Derrick is roman. Nerte is epenthetic. Nerte is detersive. Nerte is ahorseback. Nerte is repellent. Nerte is not roman. Nerte is vendible. Teodor is not detersive. Teodor is ahorseback. Teodor is repellent. Teodor is roman. If something is repellent and not detersive then it is vendible. If something is roman and ahorseback then it is vendible. White, repellent things are epenthetic. Katya is not epenthetic.", "logic": "\nDetersive(katya)\nVendible(katya)\nEpenthetic(derrick)\nDetersive(derrick)\nRepellent(derrick)\nRoman(derrick)\nEpenthetic(nerte)\nDetersive(nerte)\nAhorseback(nerte)\nRepellent(nerte)\nnot Roman(nerte)\nVendible(nerte)\nnot Detersive(teodor)\nAhorseback(teodor)\nRepellent(teodor)\nRoman(teodor)\nforall x (Repellent(x) and not Detersive(x) -> Vendible(x))\nforall x (Roman(x) and Ahorseback(x) -> Vendible(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) and Repellent(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\n\nnot Epenthetic(katya)\n\nforall x (Vendible(x) and Repellent(x) -> Epenthetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Welch is hydroponic. Welch is purulent. Nikolia is chafflike. Nikolia is hydroponic. Nikolia is undersize. Nikolia is splanchnic. Dominica is chafflike. Dominica is hydroponic. Dominica is antique. Dominica is undersize. Dominica is not splanchnic. Dominica is purulent. Tawsha is not hydroponic. Tawsha is antique. Tawsha is undersize. Tawsha is splanchnic. If something is undersize and not hydroponic then it is purulent. If something is splanchnic and antique then it is purulent. White, undersize things are chafflike. Nikolia is purulent.", "logic": "\nHydroponic(welch)\nPurulent(welch)\nChafflike(nikolia)\nHydroponic(nikolia)\nUndersize(nikolia)\nSplanchnic(nikolia)\nChafflike(dominica)\nHydroponic(dominica)\nAntique(dominica)\nUndersize(dominica)\nnot Splanchnic(dominica)\nPurulent(dominica)\nnot Hydroponic(tawsha)\nAntique(tawsha)\nUndersize(tawsha)\nSplanchnic(tawsha)\nforall x (Undersize(x) and not Hydroponic(x) -> Purulent(x))\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and Antique(x) -> Purulent(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Undersize(x) -> Chafflike(x))\n\nPurulent(nikolia)\n\nforall x (Undersize(x) and not Hydroponic(x) -> Purulent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Aubry is unwished. Aubry is naked. Elenore is musty. Elenore is unwished. Elenore is unripened. Elenore is checked. Morley is musty. Morley is unwished. Morley is alated. Morley is unripened. Morley is not checked. Morley is naked. Sayres is not unwished. Sayres is alated. Sayres is unripened. Sayres is checked. If something is unripened and not unwished then it is naked. If something is checked and alated then it is naked. White, unripened things are musty. Elenore is not alated.", "logic": "\nUnwished(aubry)\nNaked(aubry)\nMusty(elenore)\nUnwished(elenore)\nUnripened(elenore)\nChecked(elenore)\nMusty(morley)\nUnwished(morley)\nAlated(morley)\nUnripened(morley)\nnot Checked(morley)\nNaked(morley)\nnot Unwished(sayres)\nAlated(sayres)\nUnripened(sayres)\nChecked(sayres)\nforall x (Unripened(x) and not Unwished(x) -> Naked(x))\nforall x (Checked(x) and Alated(x) -> Naked(x))\nforall x (Naked(x) and Unripened(x) -> Musty(x))\n\nnot Alated(elenore)\n\nnot Alated(elenore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Aina is mutagenic. Aina is astylar. Ham is anonymous. Ham is mutagenic. Ham is hoofed. Ham is pasted. Elbertine is anonymous. Elbertine is mutagenic. Elbertine is reasonable. Elbertine is hoofed. Elbertine is not pasted. Elbertine is astylar. Hamel is not mutagenic. Hamel is reasonable. Hamel is hoofed. Hamel is pasted. If something is hoofed and not mutagenic then it is astylar. If something is pasted and reasonable then it is astylar. White, hoofed things are anonymous. Aina is pasted.", "logic": "\nMutagenic(aina)\nAstylar(aina)\nAnonymous(ham)\nMutagenic(ham)\nHoofed(ham)\nPasted(ham)\nAnonymous(elbertine)\nMutagenic(elbertine)\nReasonable(elbertine)\nHoofed(elbertine)\nnot Pasted(elbertine)\nAstylar(elbertine)\nnot Mutagenic(hamel)\nReasonable(hamel)\nHoofed(hamel)\nPasted(hamel)\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and not Mutagenic(x) -> Astylar(x))\nforall x (Pasted(x) and Reasonable(x) -> Astylar(x))\nforall x (Astylar(x) and Hoofed(x) -> Anonymous(x))\n\nPasted(aina)\n\nPasted(aina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Terra is shared. Terra is laureled. Sally is amenable. Sally is shared. Sally is wilful. Sally is mobbish. Roselyn is amenable. Roselyn is shared. Roselyn is gutless. Roselyn is wilful. Roselyn is not mobbish. Roselyn is laureled. Kendrick is not shared. Kendrick is gutless. Kendrick is wilful. Kendrick is mobbish. If something is wilful and not shared then it is laureled. If something is mobbish and gutless then it is laureled. White, wilful things are amenable. Kendrick is not big.", "logic": "\nShared(terra)\nLaureled(terra)\nAmenable(sally)\nShared(sally)\nWilful(sally)\nMobbish(sally)\nAmenable(roselyn)\nShared(roselyn)\nGutless(roselyn)\nWilful(roselyn)\nnot Mobbish(roselyn)\nLaureled(roselyn)\nnot Shared(kendrick)\nGutless(kendrick)\nWilful(kendrick)\nMobbish(kendrick)\nforall x (Wilful(x) and not Shared(x) -> Laureled(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and Gutless(x) -> Laureled(x))\nforall x (Laureled(x) and Wilful(x) -> Amenable(x))\n\nnot Big(kendrick)\n\nnot Big(kendrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "Poppy is careworn. Poppy is stingy. Lacy is slivery. Lacy is careworn. Lacy is funicular. Lacy is untwisted. Ceciley is slivery. Ceciley is careworn. Ceciley is airworthy. Ceciley is funicular. Ceciley is not untwisted. Ceciley is stingy. Granville is not careworn. Granville is airworthy. Granville is funicular. Granville is untwisted. If something is funicular and not careworn then it is stingy. If something is untwisted and airworthy then it is stingy. White, funicular things are slivery. Poppy is funicular.", "logic": "\nCareworn(poppy)\nStingy(poppy)\nSlivery(lacy)\nCareworn(lacy)\nFunicular(lacy)\nUntwisted(lacy)\nSlivery(ceciley)\nCareworn(ceciley)\nAirworthy(ceciley)\nFunicular(ceciley)\nnot Untwisted(ceciley)\nStingy(ceciley)\nnot Careworn(granville)\nAirworthy(granville)\nFunicular(granville)\nUntwisted(granville)\nforall x (Funicular(x) and not Careworn(x) -> Stingy(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) and Airworthy(x) -> Stingy(x))\nforall x (Stingy(x) and Funicular(x) -> Slivery(x))\n\nFunicular(poppy)\n\nFunicular(poppy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-510"} {"premises": "The jessa plane the raynard. The jessa is aeolian. The jessa is savoury. The jessa is alular. The jessa thatch the rikki. The jessa thatch the linn. The rikki plane the jessa. The rikki plane the raynard. The linn plane the raynard. The linn thatch the rikki. The raynard flub the linn. The raynard plane the linn. The raynard is savoury. The raynard is alular. The raynard thatch the rikki. The raynard thatch the linn. If something thatch the linn then the linn is aeolian. If something is outsized and it plane the linn then the linn is aeolian. If the jessa thatch the rikki then the rikki thatch the jessa. If something plane the raynard and the raynard thatch the jessa then it flub the raynard. If something plane the raynard then the raynard flub the rikki. If something flub the rikki then the rikki flub the jessa. The raynard thatch the rikki.", "logic": "\nPlane(jessa, raynard)\nAeolian(jessa)\nSavoury(jessa)\nAlular(jessa)\nThatch(jessa, rikki)\nThatch(jessa, linn)\nPlane(rikki, jessa)\nPlane(rikki, raynard)\nPlane(linn, raynard)\nThatch(linn, rikki)\nFlub(raynard, linn)\nPlane(raynard, linn)\nSavoury(raynard)\nAlular(raynard)\nThatch(raynard, rikki)\nThatch(raynard, linn)\nforall x (Thatch(x, linn) -> Aeolian(linn))\nforall x (Outsized(x) and Plane(x, linn) -> Aeolian(linn))\nThatch(jessa, rikki) -> Thatch(rikki, jessa)\nforall x (Plane(x, raynard) and Thatch(raynard, jessa) -> Flub(x, raynard))\nforall x (Plane(x, raynard) -> Flub(raynard, rikki))\nforall x (Flub(x, rikki) -> Flub(rikki, jessa))\n\nThatch(raynard, rikki)\n\ntherefore Thatch(raynard, rikki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The ruthann nose the filippa. The ruthann is larval. The ruthann is unlighted. The ruthann is niggling. The ruthann fertilise the aldrich. The ruthann fertilise the oren. The aldrich nose the ruthann. The aldrich nose the filippa. The oren nose the filippa. The oren fertilise the aldrich. The filippa cinematize the oren. The filippa nose the oren. The filippa is unlighted. The filippa is niggling. The filippa fertilise the aldrich. The filippa fertilise the oren. If something fertilise the oren then the oren is larval. If something is rupestral and it nose the oren then the oren is larval. If the ruthann fertilise the aldrich then the aldrich fertilise the ruthann. If something nose the filippa and the filippa fertilise the ruthann then it cinematize the filippa. If something nose the filippa then the filippa cinematize the aldrich. If something cinematize the aldrich then the aldrich cinematize the ruthann. The filippa is not unlighted.", "logic": "\nNose(ruthann, filippa)\nLarval(ruthann)\nUnlighted(ruthann)\nNiggling(ruthann)\nFertilise(ruthann, aldrich)\nFertilise(ruthann, oren)\nNose(aldrich, ruthann)\nNose(aldrich, filippa)\nNose(oren, filippa)\nFertilise(oren, aldrich)\nCinematize(filippa, oren)\nNose(filippa, oren)\nUnlighted(filippa)\nNiggling(filippa)\nFertilise(filippa, aldrich)\nFertilise(filippa, oren)\nforall x (Fertilise(x, oren) -> Larval(oren))\nforall x (Rupestral(x) and Nose(x, oren) -> Larval(oren))\nFertilise(ruthann, aldrich) -> Fertilise(aldrich, ruthann)\nforall x (Nose(x, filippa) and Fertilise(filippa, ruthann) -> Cinematize(x, filippa))\nforall x (Nose(x, filippa) -> Cinematize(filippa, aldrich))\nforall x (Cinematize(x, aldrich) -> Cinematize(aldrich, ruthann))\n\nnot Unlighted(filippa)\n\ntherefore Unlighted(filippa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The fawna castigate the caldwell. The fawna is fluky. The fawna is conclusive. The fawna is astatic. The fawna beach the haydon. The fawna beach the emilio. The haydon castigate the fawna. The haydon castigate the caldwell. The emilio castigate the caldwell. The emilio beach the haydon. The caldwell pervade the emilio. The caldwell castigate the emilio. The caldwell is conclusive. The caldwell is astatic. The caldwell beach the haydon. The caldwell beach the emilio. If something beach the emilio then the emilio is fluky. If something is bombastic and it castigate the emilio then the emilio is fluky. If the fawna beach the haydon then the haydon beach the fawna. If something castigate the caldwell and the caldwell beach the fawna then it pervade the caldwell. If something castigate the caldwell then the caldwell pervade the haydon. If something pervade the haydon then the haydon pervade the fawna. The emilio is fluky.", "logic": "\nCastigate(fawna, caldwell)\nFluky(fawna)\nConclusive(fawna)\nAstatic(fawna)\nBeach(fawna, haydon)\nBeach(fawna, emilio)\nCastigate(haydon, fawna)\nCastigate(haydon, caldwell)\nCastigate(emilio, caldwell)\nBeach(emilio, haydon)\nPervade(caldwell, emilio)\nCastigate(caldwell, emilio)\nConclusive(caldwell)\nAstatic(caldwell)\nBeach(caldwell, haydon)\nBeach(caldwell, emilio)\nforall x (Beach(x, emilio) -> Fluky(emilio))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and Castigate(x, emilio) -> Fluky(emilio))\nBeach(fawna, haydon) -> Beach(haydon, fawna)\nforall x (Castigate(x, caldwell) and Beach(caldwell, fawna) -> Pervade(x, caldwell))\nforall x (Castigate(x, caldwell) -> Pervade(caldwell, haydon))\nforall x (Pervade(x, haydon) -> Pervade(haydon, fawna))\n\nFluky(emilio)\n\nBeach(caldwell, emilio) and forall x (Beach(x, emilio) -> Fluky(emilio)) -> therefore Fluky(emilio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The mikael retaliate the mayer. The mikael is embroiled. The mikael is endless. The mikael is collegial. The mikael flocculate the dwayne. The mikael flocculate the dolores. The dwayne retaliate the mikael. The dwayne retaliate the mayer. The dolores retaliate the mayer. The dolores flocculate the dwayne. The mayer reword the dolores. The mayer retaliate the dolores. The mayer is endless. The mayer is collegial. The mayer flocculate the dwayne. The mayer flocculate the dolores. If something flocculate the dolores then the dolores is embroiled. If something is wiggly and it retaliate the dolores then the dolores is embroiled. If the mikael flocculate the dwayne then the dwayne flocculate the mikael. If something retaliate the mayer and the mayer flocculate the mikael then it reword the mayer. If something retaliate the mayer then the mayer reword the dwayne. If something reword the dwayne then the dwayne reword the mikael. The dwayne does not like the mikael.", "logic": "\nRetaliate(mikael, mayer)\nEmbroiled(mikael)\nEndless(mikael)\nCollegial(mikael)\nFlocculate(mikael, dwayne)\nFlocculate(mikael, dolores)\nRetaliate(dwayne, mikael)\nRetaliate(dwayne, mayer)\nRetaliate(dolores, mayer)\nFlocculate(dolores, dwayne)\nReword(mayer, dolores)\nRetaliate(mayer, dolores)\nEndless(mayer)\nCollegial(mayer)\nFlocculate(mayer, dwayne)\nFlocculate(mayer, dolores)\nforall x (Flocculate(x, dolores) -> Embroiled(dolores))\nforall x (Wiggly(x) and Retaliate(x, dolores) -> Embroiled(dolores))\nFlocculate(mikael, dwayne) -> Flocculate(dwayne, mikael)\nforall x (Retaliate(x, mayer) and Flocculate(mayer, mikael) -> Reword(x, mayer))\nforall x (Retaliate(x, mayer) -> Reword(mayer, dwayne))\nforall x (Reword(x, dwayne) -> Reword(dwayne, mikael))\n\nnot Flocculate(dwayne, mikael)\n\nFlocculate(mikael, dwayne) and Flocculate(mikael, dwayne) -> Flocculate(dwayne, mikael) -> therefore Flocculate(dwayne, mikael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The rosalie induce the danita. The rosalie is bass. The rosalie is glittery. The rosalie is aneurismal. The rosalie assess the myrle. The rosalie assess the revkah. The myrle induce the rosalie. The myrle induce the danita. The revkah induce the danita. The revkah assess the myrle. The danita datemark the revkah. The danita induce the revkah. The danita is glittery. The danita is aneurismal. The danita assess the myrle. The danita assess the revkah. If something assess the revkah then the revkah is bass. If something is xxviii and it induce the revkah then the revkah is bass. If the rosalie assess the myrle then the myrle assess the rosalie. If something induce the danita and the danita assess the rosalie then it datemark the danita. If something induce the danita then the danita datemark the myrle. If something datemark the myrle then the myrle datemark the rosalie. The myrle datemark the rosalie.", "logic": "\nInduce(rosalie, danita)\nBass(rosalie)\nGlittery(rosalie)\nAneurismal(rosalie)\nAssess(rosalie, myrle)\nAssess(rosalie, revkah)\nInduce(myrle, rosalie)\nInduce(myrle, danita)\nInduce(revkah, danita)\nAssess(revkah, myrle)\nDatemark(danita, revkah)\nInduce(danita, revkah)\nGlittery(danita)\nAneurismal(danita)\nAssess(danita, myrle)\nAssess(danita, revkah)\nforall x (Assess(x, revkah) -> Bass(revkah))\nforall x (Xxviii(x) and Induce(x, revkah) -> Bass(revkah))\nAssess(rosalie, myrle) -> Assess(myrle, rosalie)\nforall x (Induce(x, danita) and Assess(danita, rosalie) -> Datemark(x, danita))\nforall x (Induce(x, danita) -> Datemark(danita, myrle))\nforall x (Datemark(x, myrle) -> Datemark(myrle, rosalie))\n\nDatemark(myrle, rosalie)\n\nInduce(rosalie, danita) and forall x (Induce(x, danita) -> Datemark(danita, myrle)) -> therefore Datemark(danita, myrle) Datemark(danita, myrle) and forall x (Datemark(x, myrle) -> Datemark(myrle, rosalie)) -> therefore Datemark(myrle, rosalie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The parke energize the amalea. The parke is neritic. The parke is thickened. The parke is prosaic. The parke undergrow the ruthe. The parke undergrow the aubree. The ruthe energize the parke. The ruthe energize the amalea. The aubree energize the amalea. The aubree undergrow the ruthe. The amalea permeate the aubree. The amalea energize the aubree. The amalea is thickened. The amalea is prosaic. The amalea undergrow the ruthe. The amalea undergrow the aubree. If something undergrow the aubree then the aubree is neritic. If something is horizontal and it energize the aubree then the aubree is neritic. If the parke undergrow the ruthe then the ruthe undergrow the parke. If something energize the amalea and the amalea undergrow the parke then it permeate the amalea. If something energize the amalea then the amalea permeate the ruthe. If something permeate the ruthe then the ruthe permeate the parke. The ruthe does not chase the parke.", "logic": "\nEnergize(parke, amalea)\nNeritic(parke)\nThickened(parke)\nProsaic(parke)\nUndergrow(parke, ruthe)\nUndergrow(parke, aubree)\nEnergize(ruthe, parke)\nEnergize(ruthe, amalea)\nEnergize(aubree, amalea)\nUndergrow(aubree, ruthe)\nPermeate(amalea, aubree)\nEnergize(amalea, aubree)\nThickened(amalea)\nProsaic(amalea)\nUndergrow(amalea, ruthe)\nUndergrow(amalea, aubree)\nforall x (Undergrow(x, aubree) -> Neritic(aubree))\nforall x (Horizontal(x) and Energize(x, aubree) -> Neritic(aubree))\nUndergrow(parke, ruthe) -> Undergrow(ruthe, parke)\nforall x (Energize(x, amalea) and Undergrow(amalea, parke) -> Permeate(x, amalea))\nforall x (Energize(x, amalea) -> Permeate(amalea, ruthe))\nforall x (Permeate(x, ruthe) -> Permeate(ruthe, parke))\n\nnot Permeate(ruthe, parke)\n\nEnergize(parke, amalea) and forall x (Energize(x, amalea) -> Permeate(amalea, ruthe)) -> therefore Permeate(amalea, ruthe) Permeate(amalea, ruthe) and forall x (Permeate(x, ruthe) -> Permeate(ruthe, parke)) -> therefore Permeate(ruthe, parke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The almeta unbutton the jacynth. The almeta is revered. The almeta is snazzy. The almeta is underslung. The almeta fasten the carie. The almeta fasten the matthieu. The carie unbutton the almeta. The carie unbutton the jacynth. The matthieu unbutton the jacynth. The matthieu fasten the carie. The jacynth utilise the matthieu. The jacynth unbutton the matthieu. The jacynth is snazzy. The jacynth is underslung. The jacynth fasten the carie. The jacynth fasten the matthieu. If something fasten the matthieu then the matthieu is revered. If something is sinitic and it unbutton the matthieu then the matthieu is revered. If the almeta fasten the carie then the carie fasten the almeta. If something unbutton the jacynth and the jacynth fasten the almeta then it utilise the jacynth. If something unbutton the jacynth then the jacynth utilise the carie. If something utilise the carie then the carie utilise the almeta. The matthieu does not chase the jacynth.", "logic": "\nUnbutton(almeta, jacynth)\nRevered(almeta)\nSnazzy(almeta)\nUnderslung(almeta)\nFasten(almeta, carie)\nFasten(almeta, matthieu)\nUnbutton(carie, almeta)\nUnbutton(carie, jacynth)\nUnbutton(matthieu, jacynth)\nFasten(matthieu, carie)\nUtilise(jacynth, matthieu)\nUnbutton(jacynth, matthieu)\nSnazzy(jacynth)\nUnderslung(jacynth)\nFasten(jacynth, carie)\nFasten(jacynth, matthieu)\nforall x (Fasten(x, matthieu) -> Revered(matthieu))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) and Unbutton(x, matthieu) -> Revered(matthieu))\nFasten(almeta, carie) -> Fasten(carie, almeta)\nforall x (Unbutton(x, jacynth) and Fasten(jacynth, almeta) -> Utilise(x, jacynth))\nforall x (Unbutton(x, jacynth) -> Utilise(jacynth, carie))\nforall x (Utilise(x, carie) -> Utilise(carie, almeta))\n\nnot Utilise(matthieu, jacynth)\n\nforall x (Unbutton(x, jacynth) and Fasten(jacynth, almeta) -> Utilise(x, jacynth)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The clyde sanitise the debee. The clyde is epic. The clyde is bungaloid. The clyde is credal. The clyde obtund the moises. The clyde obtund the jori. The moises sanitise the clyde. The moises sanitise the debee. The jori sanitise the debee. The jori obtund the moises. The debee thump the jori. The debee sanitise the jori. The debee is bungaloid. The debee is credal. The debee obtund the moises. The debee obtund the jori. If something obtund the jori then the jori is epic. If something is rampant and it sanitise the jori then the jori is epic. If the clyde obtund the moises then the moises obtund the clyde. If something sanitise the debee and the debee obtund the clyde then it thump the debee. If something sanitise the debee then the debee thump the moises. If something thump the moises then the moises thump the clyde. The debee thump the debee.", "logic": "\nSanitise(clyde, debee)\nEpic(clyde)\nBungaloid(clyde)\nCredal(clyde)\nObtund(clyde, moises)\nObtund(clyde, jori)\nSanitise(moises, clyde)\nSanitise(moises, debee)\nSanitise(jori, debee)\nObtund(jori, moises)\nThump(debee, jori)\nSanitise(debee, jori)\nBungaloid(debee)\nCredal(debee)\nObtund(debee, moises)\nObtund(debee, jori)\nforall x (Obtund(x, jori) -> Epic(jori))\nforall x (Rampant(x) and Sanitise(x, jori) -> Epic(jori))\nObtund(clyde, moises) -> Obtund(moises, clyde)\nforall x (Sanitise(x, debee) and Obtund(debee, clyde) -> Thump(x, debee))\nforall x (Sanitise(x, debee) -> Thump(debee, moises))\nforall x (Thump(x, moises) -> Thump(moises, clyde))\n\nThump(debee, debee)\n\nforall x (Sanitise(x, debee) and Obtund(debee, clyde) -> Thump(x, debee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The terrye proffer the lorena. The terrye is cadenced. The terrye is inbound. The terrye is irate. The terrye unclasp the maura. The terrye unclasp the maisie. The maura proffer the terrye. The maura proffer the lorena. The maisie proffer the lorena. The maisie unclasp the maura. The lorena unbolt the maisie. The lorena proffer the maisie. The lorena is inbound. The lorena is irate. The lorena unclasp the maura. The lorena unclasp the maisie. If something unclasp the maisie then the maisie is cadenced. If something is postexilic and it proffer the maisie then the maisie is cadenced. If the terrye unclasp the maura then the maura unclasp the terrye. If something proffer the lorena and the lorena unclasp the terrye then it unbolt the lorena. If something proffer the lorena then the lorena unbolt the maura. If something unbolt the maura then the maura unbolt the terrye. The maura does not chase the lorena.", "logic": "\nProffer(terrye, lorena)\nCadenced(terrye)\nInbound(terrye)\nIrate(terrye)\nUnclasp(terrye, maura)\nUnclasp(terrye, maisie)\nProffer(maura, terrye)\nProffer(maura, lorena)\nProffer(maisie, lorena)\nUnclasp(maisie, maura)\nUnbolt(lorena, maisie)\nProffer(lorena, maisie)\nInbound(lorena)\nIrate(lorena)\nUnclasp(lorena, maura)\nUnclasp(lorena, maisie)\nforall x (Unclasp(x, maisie) -> Cadenced(maisie))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) and Proffer(x, maisie) -> Cadenced(maisie))\nUnclasp(terrye, maura) -> Unclasp(maura, terrye)\nforall x (Proffer(x, lorena) and Unclasp(lorena, terrye) -> Unbolt(x, lorena))\nforall x (Proffer(x, lorena) -> Unbolt(lorena, maura))\nforall x (Unbolt(x, maura) -> Unbolt(maura, terrye))\n\nnot Unbolt(maura, lorena)\n\nforall x (Proffer(x, lorena) and Unclasp(lorena, terrye) -> Unbolt(x, lorena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The othella overstock the margit. The othella is actuated. The othella is allophonic. The othella is bulbed. The othella satisfy the dmitri. The othella satisfy the rachel. The dmitri overstock the othella. The dmitri overstock the margit. The rachel overstock the margit. The rachel satisfy the dmitri. The margit dynamite the rachel. The margit overstock the rachel. The margit is allophonic. The margit is bulbed. The margit satisfy the dmitri. The margit satisfy the rachel. If something satisfy the rachel then the rachel is actuated. If something is reactive and it overstock the rachel then the rachel is actuated. If the othella satisfy the dmitri then the dmitri satisfy the othella. If something overstock the margit and the margit satisfy the othella then it dynamite the margit. If something overstock the margit then the margit dynamite the dmitri. If something dynamite the dmitri then the dmitri dynamite the othella. The rachel satisfy the margit.", "logic": "\nOverstock(othella, margit)\nActuated(othella)\nAllophonic(othella)\nBulbed(othella)\nSatisfy(othella, dmitri)\nSatisfy(othella, rachel)\nOverstock(dmitri, othella)\nOverstock(dmitri, margit)\nOverstock(rachel, margit)\nSatisfy(rachel, dmitri)\nDynamite(margit, rachel)\nOverstock(margit, rachel)\nAllophonic(margit)\nBulbed(margit)\nSatisfy(margit, dmitri)\nSatisfy(margit, rachel)\nforall x (Satisfy(x, rachel) -> Actuated(rachel))\nforall x (Reactive(x) and Overstock(x, rachel) -> Actuated(rachel))\nSatisfy(othella, dmitri) -> Satisfy(dmitri, othella)\nforall x (Overstock(x, margit) and Satisfy(margit, othella) -> Dynamite(x, margit))\nforall x (Overstock(x, margit) -> Dynamite(margit, dmitri))\nforall x (Dynamite(x, dmitri) -> Dynamite(dmitri, othella))\n\nSatisfy(rachel, margit)\n\nSatisfy(rachel, margit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The claudius merge the meade. The claudius is rheumy. The claudius is beginning. The claudius is borated. The claudius steamroll the martina. The claudius steamroll the kathie. The martina merge the claudius. The martina merge the meade. The kathie merge the meade. The kathie steamroll the martina. The meade biodegrade the kathie. The meade merge the kathie. The meade is beginning. The meade is borated. The meade steamroll the martina. The meade steamroll the kathie. If something steamroll the kathie then the kathie is rheumy. If something is noteworthy and it merge the kathie then the kathie is rheumy. If the claudius steamroll the martina then the martina steamroll the claudius. If something merge the meade and the meade steamroll the claudius then it biodegrade the meade. If something merge the meade then the meade biodegrade the martina. If something biodegrade the martina then the martina biodegrade the claudius. The kathie does not like the claudius.", "logic": "\nMerge(claudius, meade)\nRheumy(claudius)\nBeginning(claudius)\nBorated(claudius)\nSteamroll(claudius, martina)\nSteamroll(claudius, kathie)\nMerge(martina, claudius)\nMerge(martina, meade)\nMerge(kathie, meade)\nSteamroll(kathie, martina)\nBiodegrade(meade, kathie)\nMerge(meade, kathie)\nBeginning(meade)\nBorated(meade)\nSteamroll(meade, martina)\nSteamroll(meade, kathie)\nforall x (Steamroll(x, kathie) -> Rheumy(kathie))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) and Merge(x, kathie) -> Rheumy(kathie))\nSteamroll(claudius, martina) -> Steamroll(martina, claudius)\nforall x (Merge(x, meade) and Steamroll(meade, claudius) -> Biodegrade(x, meade))\nforall x (Merge(x, meade) -> Biodegrade(meade, martina))\nforall x (Biodegrade(x, martina) -> Biodegrade(martina, claudius))\n\nnot Steamroll(kathie, claudius)\n\nnot Steamroll(kathie, claudius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "The rowe doff the blythe. The rowe is extramural. The rowe is pinstriped. The rowe is uncrannied. The rowe squawk the rowe. The rowe squawk the malena. The rowe doff the rowe. The rowe doff the blythe. The malena doff the blythe. The malena squawk the rowe. The blythe spruce the malena. The blythe doff the malena. The blythe is pinstriped. The blythe is uncrannied. The blythe squawk the rowe. The blythe squawk the malena. If something squawk the malena then the malena is extramural. If something is tuneful and it doff the malena then the malena is extramural. If the rowe squawk the rowe then the rowe squawk the rowe. If something doff the blythe and the blythe squawk the rowe then it spruce the blythe. If something doff the blythe then the blythe spruce the rowe. If something spruce the rowe then the rowe spruce the rowe. The rowe spruce the malena.", "logic": "\nDoff(rowe, blythe)\nExtramural(rowe)\nPinstriped(rowe)\nUncrannied(rowe)\nSquawk(rowe, rowe)\nSquawk(rowe, malena)\nDoff(rowe, rowe)\nDoff(rowe, blythe)\nDoff(malena, blythe)\nSquawk(malena, rowe)\nSpruce(blythe, malena)\nDoff(blythe, malena)\nPinstriped(blythe)\nUncrannied(blythe)\nSquawk(blythe, rowe)\nSquawk(blythe, malena)\nforall x (Squawk(x, malena) -> Extramural(malena))\nforall x (Tuneful(x) and Doff(x, malena) -> Extramural(malena))\nSquawk(rowe, rowe) -> Squawk(rowe, rowe)\nforall x (Doff(x, blythe) and Squawk(blythe, rowe) -> Spruce(x, blythe))\nforall x (Doff(x, blythe) -> Spruce(blythe, rowe))\nforall x (Spruce(x, rowe) -> Spruce(rowe, rowe))\n\nSpruce(rowe, malena)\n\nSpruce(rowe, malena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-655"} {"premises": "Aleecia is leechlike. Aleecia is amoebic. Aleecia is cosmogenic. Aleecia is hydrous. Raf is oppositive. Raf is littler. Johnna is not cosmogenic. Mabel is leechlike. Mabel is oppositive. Mabel is not inwrought. If someone is hydrous then they are amoebic. Nice, cosmogenic people are amoebic. If someone is littler and inwrought then they are amoebic. All littler people are amoebic. White people are oppositive. All leechlike, littler people are hydrous. If someone is oppositive then they are not inwrought. If Raf is leechlike and Raf is inwrought then Raf is not hydrous. Raf is oppositive.", "logic": "\nLeechlike(aleecia)\nAmoebic(aleecia)\nCosmogenic(aleecia)\nHydrous(aleecia)\nOppositive(raf)\nLittler(raf)\nnot Cosmogenic(johnna)\nLeechlike(mabel)\nOppositive(mabel)\nnot Inwrought(mabel)\nforall x (Hydrous(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Inwrought(x) and Cosmogenic(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Littler(x) and Inwrought(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Littler(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Hydrous(x) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) and Littler(x) -> Hydrous(x))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) -> not Inwrought(x))\nLeechlike(raf) and Inwrought(raf) -> not Hydrous(raf)\n\nOppositive(raf)\n\ntherefore Oppositive(raf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Reed is razed. Reed is despicable. Reed is anagogical. Reed is rimy. Aharon is succinct. Aharon is lxxxi. Analise is not anagogical. Elle is razed. Elle is succinct. Elle is not filar. If someone is rimy then they are despicable. Nice, anagogical people are despicable. If someone is lxxxi and filar then they are despicable. All lxxxi people are despicable. White people are succinct. All razed, lxxxi people are rimy. If someone is succinct then they are not filar. If Aharon is razed and Aharon is filar then Aharon is not rimy. Reed is not despicable.", "logic": "\nRazed(reed)\nDespicable(reed)\nAnagogical(reed)\nRimy(reed)\nSuccinct(aharon)\nLxxxi(aharon)\nnot Anagogical(analise)\nRazed(elle)\nSuccinct(elle)\nnot Filar(elle)\nforall x (Rimy(x) -> Despicable(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) and Anagogical(x) -> Despicable(x))\nforall x (Lxxxi(x) and Filar(x) -> Despicable(x))\nforall x (Lxxxi(x) -> Despicable(x))\nforall x (Rimy(x) -> Succinct(x))\nforall x (Razed(x) and Lxxxi(x) -> Rimy(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> not Filar(x))\nRazed(aharon) and Filar(aharon) -> not Rimy(aharon)\n\nnot Despicable(reed)\n\ntherefore Despicable(reed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Timmy is apocryphal. Timmy is unstilted. Timmy is acquirable. Timmy is pallid. Denni is purulent. Denni is biracial. Tessi is not acquirable. Fortuna is apocryphal. Fortuna is purulent. Fortuna is not hygienical. If someone is pallid then they are unstilted. Nice, acquirable people are unstilted. If someone is biracial and hygienical then they are unstilted. All biracial people are unstilted. White people are purulent. All apocryphal, biracial people are pallid. If someone is purulent then they are not hygienical. If Denni is apocryphal and Denni is hygienical then Denni is not pallid. Timmy is purulent.", "logic": "\nApocryphal(timmy)\nUnstilted(timmy)\nAcquirable(timmy)\nPallid(timmy)\nPurulent(denni)\nBiracial(denni)\nnot Acquirable(tessi)\nApocryphal(fortuna)\nPurulent(fortuna)\nnot Hygienical(fortuna)\nforall x (Pallid(x) -> Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) and Acquirable(x) -> Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Biracial(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Biracial(x) -> Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Pallid(x) -> Purulent(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and Biracial(x) -> Pallid(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) -> not Hygienical(x))\nApocryphal(denni) and Hygienical(denni) -> not Pallid(denni)\n\nPurulent(timmy)\n\nPallid(timmy) and forall x (Pallid(x) -> Purulent(x)) -> therefore Purulent(timmy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Sunny is lonely. Sunny is yeasty. Sunny is offside. Sunny is devalued. Gelya is growing. Gelya is gangly. Ealasaid is not offside. Finley is lonely. Finley is growing. Finley is not xxxii. If someone is devalued then they are yeasty. Nice, offside people are yeasty. If someone is gangly and xxxii then they are yeasty. All gangly people are yeasty. White people are growing. All lonely, gangly people are devalued. If someone is growing then they are not xxxii. If Gelya is lonely and Gelya is xxxii then Gelya is not devalued. Gelya is not yeasty.", "logic": "\nLonely(sunny)\nYeasty(sunny)\nOffside(sunny)\nDevalued(sunny)\nGrowing(gelya)\nGangly(gelya)\nnot Offside(ealasaid)\nLonely(finley)\nGrowing(finley)\nnot Xxxii(finley)\nforall x (Devalued(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Xxxii(x) and Offside(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Gangly(x) and Xxxii(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Devalued(x) -> Growing(x))\nforall x (Lonely(x) and Gangly(x) -> Devalued(x))\nforall x (Growing(x) -> not Xxxii(x))\nLonely(gelya) and Xxxii(gelya) -> not Devalued(gelya)\n\nnot Yeasty(gelya)\n\nGangly(gelya) and forall x (Gangly(x) -> Yeasty(x)) -> therefore Yeasty(gelya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Daffy is coiled. Daffy is omniscient. Daffy is factious. Daffy is collateral. Madeleine is sectional. Madeleine is flattering. Arron is not factious. Aile is coiled. Aile is sectional. Aile is not velvet. If someone is collateral then they are omniscient. Nice, factious people are omniscient. If someone is flattering and velvet then they are omniscient. All flattering people are omniscient. White people are sectional. All coiled, flattering people are collateral. If someone is sectional then they are not velvet. If Madeleine is coiled and Madeleine is velvet then Madeleine is not collateral. Daffy is not velvet.", "logic": "\nCoiled(daffy)\nOmniscient(daffy)\nFactious(daffy)\nCollateral(daffy)\nSectional(madeleine)\nFlattering(madeleine)\nnot Factious(arron)\nCoiled(aile)\nSectional(aile)\nnot Velvet(aile)\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Velvet(x) and Factious(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Flattering(x) and Velvet(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Flattering(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> Sectional(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) and Flattering(x) -> Collateral(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> not Velvet(x))\nCoiled(madeleine) and Velvet(madeleine) -> not Collateral(madeleine)\n\nnot Velvet(daffy)\n\nCollateral(daffy) and forall x (Collateral(x) -> Sectional(x)) -> therefore Sectional(daffy) Sectional(daffy) and forall x (Sectional(x) -> not Velvet(x)) -> therefore not Velvet(daffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Berk is obligatory. Berk is slimy. Berk is squared. Berk is almighty. Albrecht is opening. Albrecht is banned. Selma is not squared. Broddy is obligatory. Broddy is opening. Broddy is not fugitive. If someone is almighty then they are slimy. Nice, squared people are slimy. If someone is banned and fugitive then they are slimy. All banned people are slimy. White people are opening. All obligatory, banned people are almighty. If someone is opening then they are not fugitive. If Albrecht is obligatory and Albrecht is fugitive then Albrecht is not almighty. Berk is fugitive.", "logic": "\nObligatory(berk)\nSlimy(berk)\nSquared(berk)\nAlmighty(berk)\nOpening(albrecht)\nBanned(albrecht)\nnot Squared(selma)\nObligatory(broddy)\nOpening(broddy)\nnot Fugitive(broddy)\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Fugitive(x) and Squared(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) and Fugitive(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Opening(x))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) and Banned(x) -> Almighty(x))\nforall x (Opening(x) -> not Fugitive(x))\nObligatory(albrecht) and Fugitive(albrecht) -> not Almighty(albrecht)\n\nFugitive(berk)\n\nAlmighty(berk) and forall x (Almighty(x) -> Opening(x)) -> therefore Opening(berk) Opening(berk) and forall x (Opening(x) -> not Fugitive(x)) -> therefore not Fugitive(berk)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Winthrop is unawakened. Winthrop is plural. Winthrop is baronial. Winthrop is hazy. Sella is yuman. Sella is healthy. Joselyn is not baronial. Kellen is unawakened. Kellen is yuman. Kellen is not coastal. If someone is hazy then they are plural. Nice, baronial people are plural. If someone is healthy and coastal then they are plural. All healthy people are plural. White people are yuman. All unawakened, healthy people are hazy. If someone is yuman then they are not coastal. If Sella is unawakened and Sella is coastal then Sella is not hazy. Joselyn is not yuman.", "logic": "\nUnawakened(winthrop)\nPlural(winthrop)\nBaronial(winthrop)\nHazy(winthrop)\nYuman(sella)\nHealthy(sella)\nnot Baronial(joselyn)\nUnawakened(kellen)\nYuman(kellen)\nnot Coastal(kellen)\nforall x (Hazy(x) -> Plural(x))\nforall x (Coastal(x) and Baronial(x) -> Plural(x))\nforall x (Healthy(x) and Coastal(x) -> Plural(x))\nforall x (Healthy(x) -> Plural(x))\nforall x (Hazy(x) -> Yuman(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and Healthy(x) -> Hazy(x))\nforall x (Yuman(x) -> not Coastal(x))\nUnawakened(sella) and Coastal(sella) -> not Hazy(sella)\n\nnot Yuman(joselyn)\n\nforall x (Hazy(x) -> Yuman(x)) <- forall x (Unawakened(x) and Healthy(x) -> Hazy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Kaleena is upset. Kaleena is moonlit. Kaleena is certified. Kaleena is censurable. Martainn is unsafe. Martainn is unknown. Bernita is not certified. Karoline is upset. Karoline is unsafe. Karoline is not cellulosid. If someone is censurable then they are moonlit. Nice, certified people are moonlit. If someone is unknown and cellulosid then they are moonlit. All unknown people are moonlit. White people are unsafe. All upset, unknown people are censurable. If someone is unsafe then they are not cellulosid. If Martainn is upset and Martainn is cellulosid then Martainn is not censurable. Martainn is censurable.", "logic": "\nUpset(kaleena)\nMoonlit(kaleena)\nCertified(kaleena)\nCensurable(kaleena)\nUnsafe(martainn)\nUnknown(martainn)\nnot Certified(bernita)\nUpset(karoline)\nUnsafe(karoline)\nnot Cellulosid(karoline)\nforall x (Censurable(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Cellulosid(x) and Certified(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Unknown(x) and Cellulosid(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Unknown(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Censurable(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nforall x (Upset(x) and Unknown(x) -> Censurable(x))\nforall x (Unsafe(x) -> not Cellulosid(x))\nUpset(martainn) and Cellulosid(martainn) -> not Censurable(martainn)\n\nCensurable(martainn)\n\nforall x (Upset(x) and Unknown(x) -> Censurable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Carin is perigonal. Carin is unsure. Carin is chafflike. Carin is leisured. Darcy is sepaline. Darcy is snappish. Michel is not chafflike. Stevie is perigonal. Stevie is sepaline. Stevie is not handsome. If someone is leisured then they are unsure. Nice, chafflike people are unsure. If someone is snappish and handsome then they are unsure. All snappish people are unsure. White people are sepaline. All perigonal, snappish people are leisured. If someone is sepaline then they are not handsome. If Darcy is perigonal and Darcy is handsome then Darcy is not leisured. Stevie is not unsure.", "logic": "\nPerigonal(carin)\nUnsure(carin)\nChafflike(carin)\nLeisured(carin)\nSepaline(darcy)\nSnappish(darcy)\nnot Chafflike(michel)\nPerigonal(stevie)\nSepaline(stevie)\nnot Handsome(stevie)\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Unsure(x))\nforall x (Handsome(x) and Chafflike(x) -> Unsure(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) and Handsome(x) -> Unsure(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Unsure(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Sepaline(x))\nforall x (Perigonal(x) and Snappish(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Sepaline(x) -> not Handsome(x))\nPerigonal(darcy) and Handsome(darcy) -> not Leisured(darcy)\n\nnot Unsure(stevie)\n\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Unsure(x)) <- forall x (Perigonal(x) and Snappish(x) -> Leisured(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Nike is sulky. Nike is czech. Nike is sinitic. Nike is scrawny. Crystal is bunchy. Crystal is spineless. Berty is not sinitic. Davidson is sulky. Davidson is bunchy. Davidson is not creaky. If someone is scrawny then they are czech. Nice, sinitic people are czech. If someone is spineless and creaky then they are czech. All spineless people are czech. White people are bunchy. All sulky, spineless people are scrawny. If someone is bunchy then they are not creaky. If Crystal is sulky and Crystal is creaky then Crystal is not scrawny. Berty is spineless.", "logic": "\nSulky(nike)\nCzech(nike)\nSinitic(nike)\nScrawny(nike)\nBunchy(crystal)\nSpineless(crystal)\nnot Sinitic(berty)\nSulky(davidson)\nBunchy(davidson)\nnot Creaky(davidson)\nforall x (Scrawny(x) -> Czech(x))\nforall x (Creaky(x) and Sinitic(x) -> Czech(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) and Creaky(x) -> Czech(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) -> Czech(x))\nforall x (Scrawny(x) -> Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) and Spineless(x) -> Scrawny(x))\nforall x (Bunchy(x) -> not Creaky(x))\nSulky(crystal) and Creaky(crystal) -> not Scrawny(crystal)\n\nSpineless(berty)\n\nSpineless(berty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Fulton is curvaceous. Fulton is becalmed. Fulton is supervised. Fulton is broadleaf. Tiena is diploid. Tiena is remediable. Sonnie is not supervised. Norm is curvaceous. Norm is diploid. Norm is not paniculate. If someone is broadleaf then they are becalmed. Nice, supervised people are becalmed. If someone is remediable and paniculate then they are becalmed. All remediable people are becalmed. White people are diploid. All curvaceous, remediable people are broadleaf. If someone is diploid then they are not paniculate. If Tiena is curvaceous and Tiena is paniculate then Tiena is not broadleaf. Norm is not remediable.", "logic": "\nCurvaceous(fulton)\nBecalmed(fulton)\nSupervised(fulton)\nBroadleaf(fulton)\nDiploid(tiena)\nRemediable(tiena)\nnot Supervised(sonnie)\nCurvaceous(norm)\nDiploid(norm)\nnot Paniculate(norm)\nforall x (Broadleaf(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nforall x (Paniculate(x) and Supervised(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) and Paniculate(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nforall x (Broadleaf(x) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) and Remediable(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\nforall x (Diploid(x) -> not Paniculate(x))\nCurvaceous(tiena) and Paniculate(tiena) -> not Broadleaf(tiena)\n\nnot Remediable(norm)\n\nnot Remediable(norm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Steward is rationed. Steward is gingery. Steward is fewer. Steward is painted. Scottie is isolated. Scottie is ungraceful. Mada is not fewer. Marena is rationed. Marena is isolated. Marena is not hygienical. If someone is painted then they are gingery. Nice, fewer people are gingery. If someone is ungraceful and hygienical then they are gingery. All ungraceful people are gingery. White people are isolated. All rationed, ungraceful people are painted. If someone is isolated then they are not hygienical. If Scottie is rationed and Scottie is hygienical then Scottie is not painted. Mada is hygienical.", "logic": "\nRationed(steward)\nGingery(steward)\nFewer(steward)\nPainted(steward)\nIsolated(scottie)\nUngraceful(scottie)\nnot Fewer(mada)\nRationed(marena)\nIsolated(marena)\nnot Hygienical(marena)\nforall x (Painted(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) and Fewer(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Ungraceful(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Ungraceful(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Painted(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Rationed(x) and Ungraceful(x) -> Painted(x))\nforall x (Isolated(x) -> not Hygienical(x))\nRationed(scottie) and Hygienical(scottie) -> not Painted(scottie)\n\nHygienical(mada)\n\nHygienical(mada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-116"} {"premises": "Fay is aperiodic. Katee is aperiodic. Katee is ulnar. Katee is raptorial. Skipp is aperiodic. Skipp is tempering. Skipp is raptorial. All ulnar people are bowing. If Katee is raptorial then Katee is aperiodic. Nice, raptorial people are tempering. Skipp is aperiodic.", "logic": "\nAperiodic(fay)\nAperiodic(katee)\nUlnar(katee)\nRaptorial(katee)\nAperiodic(skipp)\nTempering(skipp)\nRaptorial(skipp)\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Bowing(x))\nRaptorial(katee) -> Aperiodic(katee)\nforall x (Bowing(x) and Raptorial(x) -> Tempering(x))\n\nAperiodic(skipp)\n\ntherefore Aperiodic(skipp)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Fred is macerative. Wojciech is macerative. Wojciech is editorial. Wojciech is acinose. Westbrook is macerative. Westbrook is noncyclic. Westbrook is acinose. All editorial people are iridescent. If Wojciech is acinose then Wojciech is macerative. Nice, acinose people are noncyclic. Westbrook is not acinose.", "logic": "\nMacerative(fred)\nMacerative(wojciech)\nEditorial(wojciech)\nAcinose(wojciech)\nMacerative(westbrook)\nNoncyclic(westbrook)\nAcinose(westbrook)\nforall x (Editorial(x) -> Iridescent(x))\nAcinose(wojciech) -> Macerative(wojciech)\nforall x (Iridescent(x) and Acinose(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\n\nnot Acinose(westbrook)\n\ntherefore Acinose(westbrook)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Saul is censurable. Britni is censurable. Britni is latest. Britni is renunciant. Geoffry is censurable. Geoffry is coiled. Geoffry is renunciant. All latest people are endowed. If Britni is renunciant then Britni is censurable. Nice, renunciant people are coiled. Britni is endowed.", "logic": "\nCensurable(saul)\nCensurable(britni)\nLatest(britni)\nRenunciant(britni)\nCensurable(geoffry)\nCoiled(geoffry)\nRenunciant(geoffry)\nforall x (Latest(x) -> Endowed(x))\nRenunciant(britni) -> Censurable(britni)\nforall x (Endowed(x) and Renunciant(x) -> Coiled(x))\n\nEndowed(britni)\n\nLatest(britni) and forall x (Latest(x) -> Endowed(x)) -> therefore Endowed(britni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Inga is eutherian. Reeta is eutherian. Reeta is fattened. Reeta is glamourous. Marko is eutherian. Marko is holophytic. Marko is glamourous. All fattened people are odorless. If Reeta is glamourous then Reeta is eutherian. Nice, glamourous people are holophytic. Reeta is not odorless.", "logic": "\nEutherian(inga)\nEutherian(reeta)\nFattened(reeta)\nGlamourous(reeta)\nEutherian(marko)\nHolophytic(marko)\nGlamourous(marko)\nforall x (Fattened(x) -> Odorless(x))\nGlamourous(reeta) -> Eutherian(reeta)\nforall x (Odorless(x) and Glamourous(x) -> Holophytic(x))\n\nnot Odorless(reeta)\n\nFattened(reeta) and forall x (Fattened(x) -> Odorless(x)) -> therefore Odorless(reeta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Meyer is cancellous. Lucius is cancellous. Lucius is churlish. Lucius is raptorial. Maurise is cancellous. Maurise is pareve. Maurise is raptorial. All churlish people are shrinkable. If Lucius is raptorial then Lucius is cancellous. Nice, raptorial people are pareve. Lucius is pareve.", "logic": "\nCancellous(meyer)\nCancellous(lucius)\nChurlish(lucius)\nRaptorial(lucius)\nCancellous(maurise)\nPareve(maurise)\nRaptorial(maurise)\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> Shrinkable(x))\nRaptorial(lucius) -> Cancellous(lucius)\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) and Raptorial(x) -> Pareve(x))\n\nPareve(lucius)\n\nChurlish(lucius) and forall x (Churlish(x) -> Shrinkable(x)) -> therefore Shrinkable(lucius) Shrinkable(lucius) and Raptorial(lucius) and forall x (Shrinkable(x) and Raptorial(x) -> Pareve(x)) -> therefore Pareve(lucius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Leonora is dapper. Kam is dapper. Kam is segregated. Kam is digestive. Daune is dapper. Daune is infernal. Daune is digestive. All segregated people are unwoven. If Kam is digestive then Kam is dapper. Nice, digestive people are infernal. Kam is not infernal.", "logic": "\nDapper(leonora)\nDapper(kam)\nSegregated(kam)\nDigestive(kam)\nDapper(daune)\nInfernal(daune)\nDigestive(daune)\nforall x (Segregated(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nDigestive(kam) -> Dapper(kam)\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Digestive(x) -> Infernal(x))\n\nnot Infernal(kam)\n\nSegregated(kam) and forall x (Segregated(x) -> Unwoven(x)) -> therefore Unwoven(kam) Unwoven(kam) and Digestive(kam) and forall x (Unwoven(x) and Digestive(x) -> Infernal(x)) -> therefore Infernal(kam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Cayla is arrhythmic. Rodrick is arrhythmic. Rodrick is isogonic. Rodrick is inclusive. Baldwin is arrhythmic. Baldwin is unborn. Baldwin is inclusive. All isogonic people are unalarming. If Rodrick is inclusive then Rodrick is arrhythmic. Nice, inclusive people are unborn. Cayla is not unborn.", "logic": "\nArrhythmic(cayla)\nArrhythmic(rodrick)\nIsogonic(rodrick)\nInclusive(rodrick)\nArrhythmic(baldwin)\nUnborn(baldwin)\nInclusive(baldwin)\nforall x (Isogonic(x) -> Unalarming(x))\nInclusive(rodrick) -> Arrhythmic(rodrick)\nforall x (Unalarming(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Unborn(x))\n\nnot Unborn(cayla)\n\nforall x (Unalarming(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Unborn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Kylie is bereft. Darlene is bereft. Darlene is czaristic. Darlene is kayoed. Corinne is bereft. Corinne is stonelike. Corinne is kayoed. All czaristic people are viral. If Darlene is kayoed then Darlene is bereft. Nice, kayoed people are stonelike. Kylie is viral.", "logic": "\nBereft(kylie)\nBereft(darlene)\nCzaristic(darlene)\nKayoed(darlene)\nBereft(corinne)\nStonelike(corinne)\nKayoed(corinne)\nforall x (Czaristic(x) -> Viral(x))\nKayoed(darlene) -> Bereft(darlene)\nforall x (Viral(x) and Kayoed(x) -> Stonelike(x))\n\nViral(kylie)\n\nforall x (Czaristic(x) -> Viral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Lainey is filiform. Ranna is filiform. Ranna is fetid. Ranna is sumptuary. Charleen is filiform. Charleen is lamenting. Charleen is sumptuary. All fetid people are milky. If Ranna is sumptuary then Ranna is filiform. Nice, sumptuary people are lamenting. Charleen is not milky.", "logic": "\nFiliform(lainey)\nFiliform(ranna)\nFetid(ranna)\nSumptuary(ranna)\nFiliform(charleen)\nLamenting(charleen)\nSumptuary(charleen)\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Milky(x))\nSumptuary(ranna) -> Filiform(ranna)\nforall x (Milky(x) and Sumptuary(x) -> Lamenting(x))\n\nnot Milky(charleen)\n\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Milky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Merla is secular. Cherish is secular. Cherish is reticulate. Cherish is upcurved. Sissie is secular. Sissie is weedless. Sissie is upcurved. All reticulate people are virulent. If Cherish is upcurved then Cherish is secular. Nice, upcurved people are weedless. Sissie is blue.", "logic": "\nSecular(merla)\nSecular(cherish)\nReticulate(cherish)\nUpcurved(cherish)\nSecular(sissie)\nWeedless(sissie)\nUpcurved(sissie)\nforall x (Reticulate(x) -> Virulent(x))\nUpcurved(cherish) -> Secular(cherish)\nforall x (Virulent(x) and Upcurved(x) -> Weedless(x))\n\nBlue(sissie)\n\nBlue(sissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Milzie is humic. Ardene is humic. Ardene is filmable. Ardene is cloistral. Coleman is humic. Coleman is timely. Coleman is cloistral. All filmable people are dappled. If Ardene is cloistral then Ardene is humic. Nice, cloistral people are timely. Milzie is not big.", "logic": "\nHumic(milzie)\nHumic(ardene)\nFilmable(ardene)\nCloistral(ardene)\nHumic(coleman)\nTimely(coleman)\nCloistral(coleman)\nforall x (Filmable(x) -> Dappled(x))\nCloistral(ardene) -> Humic(ardene)\nforall x (Dappled(x) and Cloistral(x) -> Timely(x))\n\nnot Big(milzie)\n\nnot Big(milzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Karl is uncharged. Royal is uncharged. Royal is pleochroic. Royal is optimistic. Shaina is uncharged. Shaina is narcotic. Shaina is optimistic. All pleochroic people are redeeming. If Royal is optimistic then Royal is uncharged. Nice, optimistic people are narcotic. Royal is blue.", "logic": "\nUncharged(karl)\nUncharged(royal)\nPleochroic(royal)\nOptimistic(royal)\nUncharged(shaina)\nNarcotic(shaina)\nOptimistic(shaina)\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) -> Redeeming(x))\nOptimistic(royal) -> Uncharged(royal)\nforall x (Redeeming(x) and Optimistic(x) -> Narcotic(x))\n\nBlue(royal)\n\nBlue(royal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1168"} {"premises": "Dorthy is homophobic. Lorianna is brusk. Melly is homophobic. Lyda is dehydrated. Nice, homophobic people are brusk. All homophobic people are allegro. Lorianna is brusk.", "logic": "\nHomophobic(dorthy)\nBrusk(lorianna)\nHomophobic(melly)\nDehydrated(lyda)\nforall x (Allegro(x) and Homophobic(x) -> Brusk(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Allegro(x))\n\nBrusk(lorianna)\n\ntherefore Brusk(lorianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Donnie is ubiquitous. Cyndi is unthankful. Dulcia is ubiquitous. Otto is aided. Nice, ubiquitous people are unthankful. All ubiquitous people are democratic. Donnie is not ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nUbiquitous(donnie)\nUnthankful(cyndi)\nUbiquitous(dulcia)\nAided(otto)\nforall x (Democratic(x) and Ubiquitous(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> Democratic(x))\n\nnot Ubiquitous(donnie)\n\ntherefore Ubiquitous(donnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Rica is parotid. Darian is under. Hollie is parotid. Elinor is quebecois. Nice, parotid people are under. All parotid people are unkind. Rica is unkind.", "logic": "\nParotid(rica)\nUnder(darian)\nParotid(hollie)\nQuebecois(elinor)\nforall x (Unkind(x) and Parotid(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Parotid(x) -> Unkind(x))\n\nUnkind(rica)\n\nParotid(rica) and forall x (Parotid(x) -> Unkind(x)) -> therefore Unkind(rica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Ilyssa is grassless. Layton is endowed. Terrance is grassless. Marketa is repeatable. Nice, grassless people are endowed. All grassless people are receivable. Ilyssa is not receivable.", "logic": "\nGrassless(ilyssa)\nEndowed(layton)\nGrassless(terrance)\nRepeatable(marketa)\nforall x (Receivable(x) and Grassless(x) -> Endowed(x))\nforall x (Grassless(x) -> Receivable(x))\n\nnot Receivable(ilyssa)\n\nGrassless(ilyssa) and forall x (Grassless(x) -> Receivable(x)) -> therefore Receivable(ilyssa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Marylou is broken. Kermit is realistic. Walter is broken. Jennifer is sapphire. Nice, broken people are realistic. All broken people are phantasmal. Marylou is realistic.", "logic": "\nBroken(marylou)\nRealistic(kermit)\nBroken(walter)\nSapphire(jennifer)\nforall x (Phantasmal(x) and Broken(x) -> Realistic(x))\nforall x (Broken(x) -> Phantasmal(x))\n\nRealistic(marylou)\n\nBroken(marylou) and forall x (Broken(x) -> Phantasmal(x)) -> therefore Phantasmal(marylou) Phantasmal(marylou) and Broken(marylou) and forall x (Phantasmal(x) and Broken(x) -> Realistic(x)) -> therefore Realistic(marylou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Annabelle is droll. Margette is surrogate. Astra is droll. Welsh is savorless. Nice, droll people are surrogate. All droll people are implicated. Annabelle is not surrogate.", "logic": "\nDroll(annabelle)\nSurrogate(margette)\nDroll(astra)\nSavorless(welsh)\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Droll(x) -> Surrogate(x))\nforall x (Droll(x) -> Implicated(x))\n\nnot Surrogate(annabelle)\n\nDroll(annabelle) and forall x (Droll(x) -> Implicated(x)) -> therefore Implicated(annabelle) Implicated(annabelle) and Droll(annabelle) and forall x (Implicated(x) and Droll(x) -> Surrogate(x)) -> therefore Surrogate(annabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Bernetta is hammy. Gregory is toiling. Christ is hammy. Tonnie is shuddery. Nice, hammy people are toiling. All hammy people are holozoic. Tonnie is not toiling.", "logic": "\nHammy(bernetta)\nToiling(gregory)\nHammy(christ)\nShuddery(tonnie)\nforall x (Holozoic(x) and Hammy(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Holozoic(x))\n\nnot Toiling(tonnie)\n\nforall x (Holozoic(x) and Hammy(x) -> Toiling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Dimitry is crushing. Andee is stomachic. Rick is crushing. Bellanca is ornate. Nice, crushing people are stomachic. All crushing people are raspy. Andee is raspy.", "logic": "\nCrushing(dimitry)\nStomachic(andee)\nCrushing(rick)\nOrnate(bellanca)\nforall x (Raspy(x) and Crushing(x) -> Stomachic(x))\nforall x (Crushing(x) -> Raspy(x))\n\nRaspy(andee)\n\nforall x (Crushing(x) -> Raspy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Marys is loose. Merrielle is monoclinic. Doralia is loose. Ximenes is culinary. Nice, loose people are monoclinic. All loose people are choragic. Ximenes is not choragic.", "logic": "\nLoose(marys)\nMonoclinic(merrielle)\nLoose(doralia)\nCulinary(ximenes)\nforall x (Choragic(x) and Loose(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Loose(x) -> Choragic(x))\n\nnot Choragic(ximenes)\n\nforall x (Loose(x) -> Choragic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Sammie is raised. Dani is jungly. Gertrud is raised. Fazeel is colonised. Nice, raised people are jungly. All raised people are unflagging. Sammie is furry.", "logic": "\nRaised(sammie)\nJungly(dani)\nRaised(gertrud)\nColonised(fazeel)\nforall x (Unflagging(x) and Raised(x) -> Jungly(x))\nforall x (Raised(x) -> Unflagging(x))\n\nFurry(sammie)\n\nFurry(sammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Chriss is flaring. Seamus is gimbaled. Havivah is flaring. Gav is variform. Nice, flaring people are gimbaled. All flaring people are susurrous. Havivah is not red.", "logic": "\nFlaring(chriss)\nGimbaled(seamus)\nFlaring(havivah)\nVariform(gav)\nforall x (Susurrous(x) and Flaring(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) -> Susurrous(x))\n\nnot Red(havivah)\n\nnot Red(havivah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "Myke is laudable. Bartolemo is disabled. Morrie is laudable. Annabal is sanguine. Nice, laudable people are disabled. All laudable people are pale. Annabal is red.", "logic": "\nLaudable(myke)\nDisabled(bartolemo)\nLaudable(morrie)\nSanguine(annabal)\nforall x (Pale(x) and Laudable(x) -> Disabled(x))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Pale(x))\n\nRed(annabal)\n\nRed(annabal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-535"} {"premises": "The issi patent the wood. The issi is pickled. The elisa patent the wood. The elisa is ignitable. The elisa is pickled. The elisa is sabbatical. The elisa metabolize the issi. The elisa metabolize the wood. The wood applaud the elisa. The wood metabolize the issi. If the issi does not eat the elisa and the elisa is not underage then the issi is ignitable. If the wood applaud the issi and the wood patent the elisa then the wood patent the issi. If something applaud the elisa then the elisa patent the wood. If the elisa is sabbatical and the elisa metabolize the issi then the elisa does not like the issi. If something is ignitable and it does not eat the elisa then the elisa applaud the issi. Kind things are sabbatical. If something is sabbatical then it does not like the issi. If something patent the issi then the issi is not through. The wood metabolize the issi.", "logic": "\nPatent(issi, wood)\nPickled(issi)\nPatent(elisa, wood)\nIgnitable(elisa)\nPickled(elisa)\nSabbatical(elisa)\nMetabolize(elisa, issi)\nMetabolize(elisa, wood)\nApplaud(wood, elisa)\nMetabolize(wood, issi)\nnot Patent(issi, elisa) and not Underage(elisa) -> Ignitable(issi)\nApplaud(wood, issi) and Patent(wood, elisa) -> Patent(wood, issi)\nforall x (Applaud(x, elisa) -> Patent(elisa, wood))\nSabbatical(elisa) and Metabolize(elisa, issi) -> not Applaud(elisa, issi)\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and not Patent(x, elisa) -> Applaud(elisa, issi))\nforall x (Pickled(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\nforall x (Sabbatical(x) -> not Applaud(x, issi))\nforall x (Patent(x, issi) -> not Through(issi))\n\nMetabolize(wood, issi)\n\ntherefore Metabolize(wood, issi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The danna grubstake the veda. The danna is prone. The leandra grubstake the veda. The leandra is latin. The leandra is prone. The leandra is eightieth. The leandra belie the danna. The leandra belie the veda. The veda tout the leandra. The veda belie the danna. If the danna does not eat the leandra and the leandra is not dappled then the danna is latin. If the veda tout the danna and the veda grubstake the leandra then the veda grubstake the danna. If something tout the leandra then the leandra grubstake the veda. If the leandra is eightieth and the leandra belie the danna then the leandra does not like the danna. If something is latin and it does not eat the leandra then the leandra tout the danna. Kind things are eightieth. If something is eightieth then it does not like the danna. If something grubstake the danna then the danna is not outer. The danna does not eat the veda.", "logic": "\nGrubstake(danna, veda)\nProne(danna)\nGrubstake(leandra, veda)\nLatin(leandra)\nProne(leandra)\nEightieth(leandra)\nBelie(leandra, danna)\nBelie(leandra, veda)\nTout(veda, leandra)\nBelie(veda, danna)\nnot Grubstake(danna, leandra) and not Dappled(leandra) -> Latin(danna)\nTout(veda, danna) and Grubstake(veda, leandra) -> Grubstake(veda, danna)\nforall x (Tout(x, leandra) -> Grubstake(leandra, veda))\nEightieth(leandra) and Belie(leandra, danna) -> not Tout(leandra, danna)\nforall x (Latin(x) and not Grubstake(x, leandra) -> Tout(leandra, danna))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Eightieth(x))\nforall x (Eightieth(x) -> not Tout(x, danna))\nforall x (Grubstake(x, danna) -> not Outer(danna))\n\nnot Grubstake(danna, veda)\n\ntherefore Grubstake(danna, veda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The clary infix the alberta. The clary is relative. The roddie infix the alberta. The roddie is brickly. The roddie is relative. The roddie is scenic. The roddie reaffirm the clary. The roddie reaffirm the alberta. The alberta rape the roddie. The alberta reaffirm the clary. If the clary does not eat the roddie and the roddie is not anticlinal then the clary is brickly. If the alberta rape the clary and the alberta infix the roddie then the alberta infix the clary. If something rape the roddie then the roddie infix the alberta. If the roddie is scenic and the roddie reaffirm the clary then the roddie does not like the clary. If something is brickly and it does not eat the roddie then the roddie rape the clary. Kind things are scenic. If something is scenic then it does not like the clary. If something infix the clary then the clary is not patriotic. The roddie does not like the clary.", "logic": "\nInfix(clary, alberta)\nRelative(clary)\nInfix(roddie, alberta)\nBrickly(roddie)\nRelative(roddie)\nScenic(roddie)\nReaffirm(roddie, clary)\nReaffirm(roddie, alberta)\nRape(alberta, roddie)\nReaffirm(alberta, clary)\nnot Infix(clary, roddie) and not Anticlinal(roddie) -> Brickly(clary)\nRape(alberta, clary) and Infix(alberta, roddie) -> Infix(alberta, clary)\nforall x (Rape(x, roddie) -> Infix(roddie, alberta))\nScenic(roddie) and Reaffirm(roddie, clary) -> not Rape(roddie, clary)\nforall x (Brickly(x) and not Infix(x, roddie) -> Rape(roddie, clary))\nforall x (Relative(x) -> Scenic(x))\nforall x (Scenic(x) -> not Rape(x, clary))\nforall x (Infix(x, clary) -> not Patriotic(clary))\n\nnot Rape(roddie, clary)\n\nScenic(roddie) and forall x (Scenic(x) -> not Rape(x, clary)) -> therefore not Rape(roddie, clary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The ambros recharge the milly. The ambros is adored. The arline recharge the milly. The arline is telescopic. The arline is adored. The arline is untenable. The arline mongrelise the ambros. The arline mongrelise the milly. The milly space the arline. The milly mongrelise the ambros. If the ambros does not eat the arline and the arline is not prakritic then the ambros is telescopic. If the milly space the ambros and the milly recharge the arline then the milly recharge the ambros. If something space the arline then the arline recharge the milly. If the arline is untenable and the arline mongrelise the ambros then the arline does not like the ambros. If something is telescopic and it does not eat the arline then the arline space the ambros. Kind things are untenable. If something is untenable then it does not like the ambros. If something recharge the ambros then the ambros is not flooded. The arline space the ambros.", "logic": "\nRecharge(ambros, milly)\nAdored(ambros)\nRecharge(arline, milly)\nTelescopic(arline)\nAdored(arline)\nUntenable(arline)\nMongrelise(arline, ambros)\nMongrelise(arline, milly)\nSpace(milly, arline)\nMongrelise(milly, ambros)\nnot Recharge(ambros, arline) and not Prakritic(arline) -> Telescopic(ambros)\nSpace(milly, ambros) and Recharge(milly, arline) -> Recharge(milly, ambros)\nforall x (Space(x, arline) -> Recharge(arline, milly))\nUntenable(arline) and Mongrelise(arline, ambros) -> not Space(arline, ambros)\nforall x (Telescopic(x) and not Recharge(x, arline) -> Space(arline, ambros))\nforall x (Adored(x) -> Untenable(x))\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> not Space(x, ambros))\nforall x (Recharge(x, ambros) -> not Flooded(ambros))\n\nSpace(arline, ambros)\n\nUntenable(arline) and forall x (Untenable(x) -> not Space(x, ambros)) -> therefore not Space(arline, ambros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The rici grate the fox. The rici is woolen. The lorianna grate the fox. The lorianna is diazo. The lorianna is woolen. The lorianna is nurturant. The lorianna slice the rici. The lorianna slice the fox. The fox popularise the lorianna. The fox slice the rici. If the rici does not eat the lorianna and the lorianna is not linelike then the rici is diazo. If the fox popularise the rici and the fox grate the lorianna then the fox grate the rici. If something popularise the lorianna then the lorianna grate the fox. If the lorianna is nurturant and the lorianna slice the rici then the lorianna does not like the rici. If something is diazo and it does not eat the lorianna then the lorianna popularise the rici. Kind things are nurturant. If something is nurturant then it does not like the rici. If something grate the rici then the rici is not phlegmy. The rici does not like the rici.", "logic": "\nGrate(rici, fox)\nWoolen(rici)\nGrate(lorianna, fox)\nDiazo(lorianna)\nWoolen(lorianna)\nNurturant(lorianna)\nSlice(lorianna, rici)\nSlice(lorianna, fox)\nPopularise(fox, lorianna)\nSlice(fox, rici)\nnot Grate(rici, lorianna) and not Linelike(lorianna) -> Diazo(rici)\nPopularise(fox, rici) and Grate(fox, lorianna) -> Grate(fox, rici)\nforall x (Popularise(x, lorianna) -> Grate(lorianna, fox))\nNurturant(lorianna) and Slice(lorianna, rici) -> not Popularise(lorianna, rici)\nforall x (Diazo(x) and not Grate(x, lorianna) -> Popularise(lorianna, rici))\nforall x (Woolen(x) -> Nurturant(x))\nforall x (Nurturant(x) -> not Popularise(x, rici))\nforall x (Grate(x, rici) -> not Phlegmy(rici))\n\nnot Popularise(rici, rici)\n\nWoolen(rici) and forall x (Woolen(x) -> Nurturant(x)) -> therefore Nurturant(rici) Nurturant(rici) and forall x (Nurturant(x) -> not Popularise(x, rici)) -> therefore not Popularise(rici, rici)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The mahala blither the dario. The mahala is botryoid. The arabelle blither the dario. The arabelle is extrinsic. The arabelle is botryoid. The arabelle is gingival. The arabelle shin the mahala. The arabelle shin the dario. The dario channelise the arabelle. The dario shin the mahala. If the mahala does not eat the arabelle and the arabelle is not eccentric then the mahala is extrinsic. If the dario channelise the mahala and the dario blither the arabelle then the dario blither the mahala. If something channelise the arabelle then the arabelle blither the dario. If the arabelle is gingival and the arabelle shin the mahala then the arabelle does not like the mahala. If something is extrinsic and it does not eat the arabelle then the arabelle channelise the mahala. Kind things are gingival. If something is gingival then it does not like the mahala. If something blither the mahala then the mahala is not pencilled. The mahala channelise the mahala.", "logic": "\nBlither(mahala, dario)\nBotryoid(mahala)\nBlither(arabelle, dario)\nExtrinsic(arabelle)\nBotryoid(arabelle)\nGingival(arabelle)\nShin(arabelle, mahala)\nShin(arabelle, dario)\nChannelise(dario, arabelle)\nShin(dario, mahala)\nnot Blither(mahala, arabelle) and not Eccentric(arabelle) -> Extrinsic(mahala)\nChannelise(dario, mahala) and Blither(dario, arabelle) -> Blither(dario, mahala)\nforall x (Channelise(x, arabelle) -> Blither(arabelle, dario))\nGingival(arabelle) and Shin(arabelle, mahala) -> not Channelise(arabelle, mahala)\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) and not Blither(x, arabelle) -> Channelise(arabelle, mahala))\nforall x (Botryoid(x) -> Gingival(x))\nforall x (Gingival(x) -> not Channelise(x, mahala))\nforall x (Blither(x, mahala) -> not Pencilled(mahala))\n\nChannelise(mahala, mahala)\n\nBotryoid(mahala) and forall x (Botryoid(x) -> Gingival(x)) -> therefore Gingival(mahala) Gingival(mahala) and forall x (Gingival(x) -> not Channelise(x, mahala)) -> therefore not Channelise(mahala, mahala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The ruthy divaricate the ainslee. The ruthy is danish. The leigh divaricate the ainslee. The leigh is beaming. The leigh is danish. The leigh is delphian. The leigh reason the ruthy. The leigh reason the ainslee. The ainslee repurchase the leigh. The ainslee reason the ruthy. If the ruthy does not eat the leigh and the leigh is not pyloric then the ruthy is beaming. If the ainslee repurchase the ruthy and the ainslee divaricate the leigh then the ainslee divaricate the ruthy. If something repurchase the leigh then the leigh divaricate the ainslee. If the leigh is delphian and the leigh reason the ruthy then the leigh does not like the ruthy. If something is beaming and it does not eat the leigh then the leigh repurchase the ruthy. Kind things are delphian. If something is delphian then it does not like the ruthy. If something divaricate the ruthy then the ruthy is not tripartite. The ainslee does not eat the ruthy.", "logic": "\nDivaricate(ruthy, ainslee)\nDanish(ruthy)\nDivaricate(leigh, ainslee)\nBeaming(leigh)\nDanish(leigh)\nDelphian(leigh)\nReason(leigh, ruthy)\nReason(leigh, ainslee)\nRepurchase(ainslee, leigh)\nReason(ainslee, ruthy)\nnot Divaricate(ruthy, leigh) and not Pyloric(leigh) -> Beaming(ruthy)\nRepurchase(ainslee, ruthy) and Divaricate(ainslee, leigh) -> Divaricate(ainslee, ruthy)\nforall x (Repurchase(x, leigh) -> Divaricate(leigh, ainslee))\nDelphian(leigh) and Reason(leigh, ruthy) -> not Repurchase(leigh, ruthy)\nforall x (Beaming(x) and not Divaricate(x, leigh) -> Repurchase(leigh, ruthy))\nforall x (Danish(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Delphian(x) -> not Repurchase(x, ruthy))\nforall x (Divaricate(x, ruthy) -> not Tripartite(ruthy))\n\nnot Divaricate(ainslee, ruthy)\n\nRepurchase(ainslee, ruthy) and Divaricate(ainslee, leigh) -> Divaricate(ainslee, ruthy) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The amabelle resettle the nat. The amabelle is silvan. The paddie resettle the nat. The paddie is dropping. The paddie is silvan. The paddie is vestmented. The paddie bewilder the amabelle. The paddie bewilder the nat. The nat cashier the paddie. The nat bewilder the amabelle. If the amabelle does not eat the paddie and the paddie is not ungummed then the amabelle is dropping. If the nat cashier the amabelle and the nat resettle the paddie then the nat resettle the amabelle. If something cashier the paddie then the paddie resettle the nat. If the paddie is vestmented and the paddie bewilder the amabelle then the paddie does not like the amabelle. If something is dropping and it does not eat the paddie then the paddie cashier the amabelle. Kind things are vestmented. If something is vestmented then it does not like the amabelle. If something resettle the amabelle then the amabelle is not neutral. The nat is vestmented.", "logic": "\nResettle(amabelle, nat)\nSilvan(amabelle)\nResettle(paddie, nat)\nDropping(paddie)\nSilvan(paddie)\nVestmented(paddie)\nBewilder(paddie, amabelle)\nBewilder(paddie, nat)\nCashier(nat, paddie)\nBewilder(nat, amabelle)\nnot Resettle(amabelle, paddie) and not Ungummed(paddie) -> Dropping(amabelle)\nCashier(nat, amabelle) and Resettle(nat, paddie) -> Resettle(nat, amabelle)\nforall x (Cashier(x, paddie) -> Resettle(paddie, nat))\nVestmented(paddie) and Bewilder(paddie, amabelle) -> not Cashier(paddie, amabelle)\nforall x (Dropping(x) and not Resettle(x, paddie) -> Cashier(paddie, amabelle))\nforall x (Silvan(x) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Vestmented(x) -> not Cashier(x, amabelle))\nforall x (Resettle(x, amabelle) -> not Neutral(amabelle))\n\nVestmented(nat)\n\nforall x (Silvan(x) -> Vestmented(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The jacynth hallow the winn. The jacynth is broke. The vere hallow the winn. The vere is bicorned. The vere is broke. The vere is rallying. The vere bound the jacynth. The vere bound the winn. The winn robe the vere. The winn bound the jacynth. If the jacynth does not eat the vere and the vere is not hindmost then the jacynth is bicorned. If the winn robe the jacynth and the winn hallow the vere then the winn hallow the jacynth. If something robe the vere then the vere hallow the winn. If the vere is rallying and the vere bound the jacynth then the vere does not like the jacynth. If something is bicorned and it does not eat the vere then the vere robe the jacynth. Kind things are rallying. If something is rallying then it does not like the jacynth. If something hallow the jacynth then the jacynth is not egoistic. The jacynth is not bicorned.", "logic": "\nHallow(jacynth, winn)\nBroke(jacynth)\nHallow(vere, winn)\nBicorned(vere)\nBroke(vere)\nRallying(vere)\nBound(vere, jacynth)\nBound(vere, winn)\nRobe(winn, vere)\nBound(winn, jacynth)\nnot Hallow(jacynth, vere) and not Hindmost(vere) -> Bicorned(jacynth)\nRobe(winn, jacynth) and Hallow(winn, vere) -> Hallow(winn, jacynth)\nforall x (Robe(x, vere) -> Hallow(vere, winn))\nRallying(vere) and Bound(vere, jacynth) -> not Robe(vere, jacynth)\nforall x (Bicorned(x) and not Hallow(x, vere) -> Robe(vere, jacynth))\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Rallying(x))\nforall x (Rallying(x) -> not Robe(x, jacynth))\nforall x (Hallow(x, jacynth) -> not Egoistic(jacynth))\n\nnot Bicorned(jacynth)\n\nnot Hallow(jacynth, vere) and not Hindmost(vere) -> Bicorned(jacynth) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The durand bombproof the peggie. The durand is aerial. The roddy bombproof the peggie. The roddy is reentrant. The roddy is aerial. The roddy is avertable. The roddy ensnare the durand. The roddy ensnare the peggie. The peggie stupefy the roddy. The peggie ensnare the durand. If the durand does not eat the roddy and the roddy is not carbonic then the durand is reentrant. If the peggie stupefy the durand and the peggie bombproof the roddy then the peggie bombproof the durand. If something stupefy the roddy then the roddy bombproof the peggie. If the roddy is avertable and the roddy ensnare the durand then the roddy does not like the durand. If something is reentrant and it does not eat the roddy then the roddy stupefy the durand. Kind things are avertable. If something is avertable then it does not like the durand. If something bombproof the durand then the durand is not prosaic. The peggie bombproof the roddy.", "logic": "\nBombproof(durand, peggie)\nAerial(durand)\nBombproof(roddy, peggie)\nReentrant(roddy)\nAerial(roddy)\nAvertable(roddy)\nEnsnare(roddy, durand)\nEnsnare(roddy, peggie)\nStupefy(peggie, roddy)\nEnsnare(peggie, durand)\nnot Bombproof(durand, roddy) and not Carbonic(roddy) -> Reentrant(durand)\nStupefy(peggie, durand) and Bombproof(peggie, roddy) -> Bombproof(peggie, durand)\nforall x (Stupefy(x, roddy) -> Bombproof(roddy, peggie))\nAvertable(roddy) and Ensnare(roddy, durand) -> not Stupefy(roddy, durand)\nforall x (Reentrant(x) and not Bombproof(x, roddy) -> Stupefy(roddy, durand))\nforall x (Aerial(x) -> Avertable(x))\nforall x (Avertable(x) -> not Stupefy(x, durand))\nforall x (Bombproof(x, durand) -> not Prosaic(durand))\n\nBombproof(peggie, roddy)\n\nBombproof(peggie, roddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The lyndsey corn the travers. The lyndsey is grouchy. The marline corn the travers. The marline is desultory. The marline is grouchy. The marline is cernuous. The marline supply the lyndsey. The marline supply the travers. The travers mull the marline. The travers supply the lyndsey. If the lyndsey does not eat the marline and the marline is not ergotropic then the lyndsey is desultory. If the travers mull the lyndsey and the travers corn the marline then the travers corn the lyndsey. If something mull the marline then the marline corn the travers. If the marline is cernuous and the marline supply the lyndsey then the marline does not like the lyndsey. If something is desultory and it does not eat the marline then the marline mull the lyndsey. Kind things are cernuous. If something is cernuous then it does not like the lyndsey. If something corn the lyndsey then the lyndsey is not philippine. The lyndsey does not like the marline.", "logic": "\nCorn(lyndsey, travers)\nGrouchy(lyndsey)\nCorn(marline, travers)\nDesultory(marline)\nGrouchy(marline)\nCernuous(marline)\nSupply(marline, lyndsey)\nSupply(marline, travers)\nMull(travers, marline)\nSupply(travers, lyndsey)\nnot Corn(lyndsey, marline) and not Ergotropic(marline) -> Desultory(lyndsey)\nMull(travers, lyndsey) and Corn(travers, marline) -> Corn(travers, lyndsey)\nforall x (Mull(x, marline) -> Corn(marline, travers))\nCernuous(marline) and Supply(marline, lyndsey) -> not Mull(marline, lyndsey)\nforall x (Desultory(x) and not Corn(x, marline) -> Mull(marline, lyndsey))\nforall x (Grouchy(x) -> Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Cernuous(x) -> not Mull(x, lyndsey))\nforall x (Corn(x, lyndsey) -> not Philippine(lyndsey))\n\nnot Mull(lyndsey, marline)\n\nnot Mull(lyndsey, marline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "The jotham concenter the nels. The jotham is iambic. The cammy concenter the nels. The cammy is limitless. The cammy is iambic. The cammy is reported. The cammy rendezvous the jotham. The cammy rendezvous the nels. The nels garage the cammy. The nels rendezvous the jotham. If the jotham does not eat the cammy and the cammy is not slumberous then the jotham is limitless. If the nels garage the jotham and the nels concenter the cammy then the nels concenter the jotham. If something garage the cammy then the cammy concenter the nels. If the cammy is reported and the cammy rendezvous the jotham then the cammy does not like the jotham. If something is limitless and it does not eat the cammy then the cammy garage the jotham. Kind things are reported. If something is reported then it does not like the jotham. If something concenter the jotham then the jotham is not spinnbar. The cammy garage the nels.", "logic": "\nConcenter(jotham, nels)\nIambic(jotham)\nConcenter(cammy, nels)\nLimitless(cammy)\nIambic(cammy)\nReported(cammy)\nRendezvous(cammy, jotham)\nRendezvous(cammy, nels)\nGarage(nels, cammy)\nRendezvous(nels, jotham)\nnot Concenter(jotham, cammy) and not Slumberous(cammy) -> Limitless(jotham)\nGarage(nels, jotham) and Concenter(nels, cammy) -> Concenter(nels, jotham)\nforall x (Garage(x, cammy) -> Concenter(cammy, nels))\nReported(cammy) and Rendezvous(cammy, jotham) -> not Garage(cammy, jotham)\nforall x (Limitless(x) and not Concenter(x, cammy) -> Garage(cammy, jotham))\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Reported(x) -> not Garage(x, jotham))\nforall x (Concenter(x, jotham) -> not Spinnbar(jotham))\n\nGarage(cammy, nels)\n\nGarage(cammy, nels) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1188"} {"premises": "Randell is anagogic. Randell is xerophytic. Randell is appeasable. Corly is likeable. Corly is anagogic. Corly is xerophytic. Corly is appeasable. Corly is human. Corly is dual. Corly is sneaky. Pincus is likeable. Pincus is human. Pincus is dual. Gussie is likeable. Gussie is anagogic. Gussie is human. Cold things are human. Nice, sneaky things are anagogic. Red, xerophytic things are appeasable. All human things are xerophytic. If Gussie is dual then Gussie is xerophytic. If Corly is sneaky then Corly is appeasable. All sneaky things are appeasable. If something is anagogic then it is likeable. Corly is anagogic.", "logic": "\nAnagogic(randell)\nXerophytic(randell)\nAppeasable(randell)\nLikeable(corly)\nAnagogic(corly)\nXerophytic(corly)\nAppeasable(corly)\nHuman(corly)\nDual(corly)\nSneaky(corly)\nLikeable(pincus)\nHuman(pincus)\nDual(pincus)\nLikeable(gussie)\nAnagogic(gussie)\nHuman(gussie)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Human(x) and Sneaky(x) -> Anagogic(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) and Xerophytic(x) -> Appeasable(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Xerophytic(x))\nDual(gussie) -> Xerophytic(gussie)\nSneaky(corly) -> Appeasable(corly)\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Appeasable(x))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Likeable(x))\n\nAnagogic(corly)\n\ntherefore Anagogic(corly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Guendolen is ergodic. Guendolen is carinate. Guendolen is racial. Gussy is seeded. Gussy is ergodic. Gussy is carinate. Gussy is racial. Gussy is asymptotic. Gussy is berried. Gussy is aramean. Ramsay is seeded. Ramsay is asymptotic. Ramsay is berried. Ole is seeded. Ole is ergodic. Ole is asymptotic. Cold things are asymptotic. Nice, aramean things are ergodic. Red, carinate things are racial. All asymptotic things are carinate. If Ole is berried then Ole is carinate. If Gussy is aramean then Gussy is racial. All aramean things are racial. If something is ergodic then it is seeded. Gussy is not carinate.", "logic": "\nErgodic(guendolen)\nCarinate(guendolen)\nRacial(guendolen)\nSeeded(gussy)\nErgodic(gussy)\nCarinate(gussy)\nRacial(gussy)\nAsymptotic(gussy)\nBerried(gussy)\nAramean(gussy)\nSeeded(ramsay)\nAsymptotic(ramsay)\nBerried(ramsay)\nSeeded(ole)\nErgodic(ole)\nAsymptotic(ole)\nforall x (Ergodic(x) -> Asymptotic(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) and Aramean(x) -> Ergodic(x))\nforall x (Berried(x) and Carinate(x) -> Racial(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) -> Carinate(x))\nBerried(ole) -> Carinate(ole)\nAramean(gussy) -> Racial(gussy)\nforall x (Aramean(x) -> Racial(x))\nforall x (Ergodic(x) -> Seeded(x))\n\nnot Carinate(gussy)\n\ntherefore Carinate(gussy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Anatoly is liplike. Anatoly is twisting. Anatoly is doctrinal. Jeannette is papistic. Jeannette is liplike. Jeannette is twisting. Jeannette is doctrinal. Jeannette is unvaned. Jeannette is reddish. Jeannette is sinhalese. Lucian is papistic. Lucian is unvaned. Lucian is reddish. Bronson is papistic. Bronson is liplike. Bronson is unvaned. Cold things are unvaned. Nice, sinhalese things are liplike. Red, twisting things are doctrinal. All unvaned things are twisting. If Bronson is reddish then Bronson is twisting. If Jeannette is sinhalese then Jeannette is doctrinal. All sinhalese things are doctrinal. If something is liplike then it is papistic. Bronson is twisting.", "logic": "\nLiplike(anatoly)\nTwisting(anatoly)\nDoctrinal(anatoly)\nPapistic(jeannette)\nLiplike(jeannette)\nTwisting(jeannette)\nDoctrinal(jeannette)\nUnvaned(jeannette)\nReddish(jeannette)\nSinhalese(jeannette)\nPapistic(lucian)\nUnvaned(lucian)\nReddish(lucian)\nPapistic(bronson)\nLiplike(bronson)\nUnvaned(bronson)\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Unvaned(x))\nforall x (Unvaned(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Liplike(x))\nforall x (Reddish(x) and Twisting(x) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Unvaned(x) -> Twisting(x))\nReddish(bronson) -> Twisting(bronson)\nSinhalese(jeannette) -> Doctrinal(jeannette)\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Papistic(x))\n\nTwisting(bronson)\n\nUnvaned(bronson) and forall x (Unvaned(x) -> Twisting(x)) -> therefore Twisting(bronson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Sande is dipped. Sande is licensed. Sande is lineal. Blondelle is doglike. Blondelle is dipped. Blondelle is licensed. Blondelle is lineal. Blondelle is bolshevik. Blondelle is ended. Blondelle is acapnic. Augustin is doglike. Augustin is bolshevik. Augustin is ended. Quinn is doglike. Quinn is dipped. Quinn is bolshevik. Cold things are bolshevik. Nice, acapnic things are dipped. Red, licensed things are lineal. All bolshevik things are licensed. If Quinn is ended then Quinn is licensed. If Blondelle is acapnic then Blondelle is lineal. All acapnic things are lineal. If something is dipped then it is doglike. Quinn is not licensed.", "logic": "\nDipped(sande)\nLicensed(sande)\nLineal(sande)\nDoglike(blondelle)\nDipped(blondelle)\nLicensed(blondelle)\nLineal(blondelle)\nBolshevik(blondelle)\nEnded(blondelle)\nAcapnic(blondelle)\nDoglike(augustin)\nBolshevik(augustin)\nEnded(augustin)\nDoglike(quinn)\nDipped(quinn)\nBolshevik(quinn)\nforall x (Dipped(x) -> Bolshevik(x))\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) and Acapnic(x) -> Dipped(x))\nforall x (Ended(x) and Licensed(x) -> Lineal(x))\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) -> Licensed(x))\nEnded(quinn) -> Licensed(quinn)\nAcapnic(blondelle) -> Lineal(blondelle)\nforall x (Acapnic(x) -> Lineal(x))\nforall x (Dipped(x) -> Doglike(x))\n\nnot Licensed(quinn)\n\nBolshevik(quinn) and forall x (Bolshevik(x) -> Licensed(x)) -> therefore Licensed(quinn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Jackson is vaporish. Jackson is continuing. Jackson is monarchal. Velvet is corporal. Velvet is vaporish. Velvet is continuing. Velvet is monarchal. Velvet is arbitral. Velvet is chantlike. Velvet is cleanable. Cybelle is corporal. Cybelle is arbitral. Cybelle is chantlike. Gustave is corporal. Gustave is vaporish. Gustave is arbitral. Cold things are arbitral. Nice, cleanable things are vaporish. Red, continuing things are monarchal. All arbitral things are continuing. If Gustave is chantlike then Gustave is continuing. If Velvet is cleanable then Velvet is monarchal. All cleanable things are monarchal. If something is vaporish then it is corporal. Cybelle is monarchal.", "logic": "\nVaporish(jackson)\nContinuing(jackson)\nMonarchal(jackson)\nCorporal(velvet)\nVaporish(velvet)\nContinuing(velvet)\nMonarchal(velvet)\nArbitral(velvet)\nChantlike(velvet)\nCleanable(velvet)\nCorporal(cybelle)\nArbitral(cybelle)\nChantlike(cybelle)\nCorporal(gustave)\nVaporish(gustave)\nArbitral(gustave)\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Arbitral(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) and Cleanable(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) and Continuing(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) -> Continuing(x))\nChantlike(gustave) -> Continuing(gustave)\nCleanable(velvet) -> Monarchal(velvet)\nforall x (Cleanable(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Corporal(x))\n\nMonarchal(cybelle)\n\nArbitral(cybelle) and forall x (Arbitral(x) -> Continuing(x)) -> therefore Continuing(cybelle) Chantlike(cybelle) and Continuing(cybelle) and forall x (Chantlike(x) and Continuing(x) -> Monarchal(x)) -> therefore Monarchal(cybelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Jervis is immense. Jervis is frequent. Jervis is thalassic. Yaakov is conserved. Yaakov is immense. Yaakov is frequent. Yaakov is thalassic. Yaakov is washy. Yaakov is processed. Yaakov is fewer. Cassi is conserved. Cassi is washy. Cassi is processed. Nataline is conserved. Nataline is immense. Nataline is washy. Cold things are washy. Nice, fewer things are immense. Red, frequent things are thalassic. All washy things are frequent. If Nataline is processed then Nataline is frequent. If Yaakov is fewer then Yaakov is thalassic. All fewer things are thalassic. If something is immense then it is conserved. Cassi is not thalassic.", "logic": "\nImmense(jervis)\nFrequent(jervis)\nThalassic(jervis)\nConserved(yaakov)\nImmense(yaakov)\nFrequent(yaakov)\nThalassic(yaakov)\nWashy(yaakov)\nProcessed(yaakov)\nFewer(yaakov)\nConserved(cassi)\nWashy(cassi)\nProcessed(cassi)\nConserved(nataline)\nImmense(nataline)\nWashy(nataline)\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Washy(x))\nforall x (Washy(x) and Fewer(x) -> Immense(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) and Frequent(x) -> Thalassic(x))\nforall x (Washy(x) -> Frequent(x))\nProcessed(nataline) -> Frequent(nataline)\nFewer(yaakov) -> Thalassic(yaakov)\nforall x (Fewer(x) -> Thalassic(x))\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Conserved(x))\n\nnot Thalassic(cassi)\n\nWashy(cassi) and forall x (Washy(x) -> Frequent(x)) -> therefore Frequent(cassi) Processed(cassi) and Frequent(cassi) and forall x (Processed(x) and Frequent(x) -> Thalassic(x)) -> therefore Thalassic(cassi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Clarisa is leased. Clarisa is improbable. Clarisa is irksome. Shell is tearless. Shell is leased. Shell is improbable. Shell is irksome. Shell is packaged. Shell is breeding. Shell is slovenian. Sandie is tearless. Sandie is packaged. Sandie is breeding. Deana is tearless. Deana is leased. Deana is packaged. Cold things are packaged. Nice, slovenian things are leased. Red, improbable things are irksome. All packaged things are improbable. If Deana is breeding then Deana is improbable. If Shell is slovenian then Shell is irksome. All slovenian things are irksome. If something is leased then it is tearless. Deana is not irksome.", "logic": "\nLeased(clarisa)\nImprobable(clarisa)\nIrksome(clarisa)\nTearless(shell)\nLeased(shell)\nImprobable(shell)\nIrksome(shell)\nPackaged(shell)\nBreeding(shell)\nSlovenian(shell)\nTearless(sandie)\nPackaged(sandie)\nBreeding(sandie)\nTearless(deana)\nLeased(deana)\nPackaged(deana)\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Packaged(x) and Slovenian(x) -> Leased(x))\nforall x (Breeding(x) and Improbable(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> Improbable(x))\nBreeding(deana) -> Improbable(deana)\nSlovenian(shell) -> Irksome(shell)\nforall x (Slovenian(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Tearless(x))\n\nnot Irksome(deana)\n\nforall x (Breeding(x) and Improbable(x) -> Irksome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Kalvin is tokenish. Kalvin is roast. Kalvin is flowerless. Garv is archaean. Garv is tokenish. Garv is roast. Garv is flowerless. Garv is radiant. Garv is olfactory. Garv is misogynic. Skippy is archaean. Skippy is radiant. Skippy is olfactory. Idalina is archaean. Idalina is tokenish. Idalina is radiant. Cold things are radiant. Nice, misogynic things are tokenish. Red, roast things are flowerless. All radiant things are roast. If Idalina is olfactory then Idalina is roast. If Garv is misogynic then Garv is flowerless. All misogynic things are flowerless. If something is tokenish then it is archaean. Skippy is tokenish.", "logic": "\nTokenish(kalvin)\nRoast(kalvin)\nFlowerless(kalvin)\nArchaean(garv)\nTokenish(garv)\nRoast(garv)\nFlowerless(garv)\nRadiant(garv)\nOlfactory(garv)\nMisogynic(garv)\nArchaean(skippy)\nRadiant(skippy)\nOlfactory(skippy)\nArchaean(idalina)\nTokenish(idalina)\nRadiant(idalina)\nforall x (Tokenish(x) -> Radiant(x))\nforall x (Radiant(x) and Misogynic(x) -> Tokenish(x))\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and Roast(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Radiant(x) -> Roast(x))\nOlfactory(idalina) -> Roast(idalina)\nMisogynic(garv) -> Flowerless(garv)\nforall x (Misogynic(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Tokenish(x) -> Archaean(x))\n\nTokenish(skippy)\n\nforall x (Radiant(x) and Misogynic(x) -> Tokenish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Colbert is atheist. Colbert is unsatiated. Colbert is healthy. Mairead is tabu. Mairead is atheist. Mairead is unsatiated. Mairead is healthy. Mairead is iritic. Mairead is homely. Mairead is divisional. Giffie is tabu. Giffie is iritic. Giffie is homely. Britta is tabu. Britta is atheist. Britta is iritic. Cold things are iritic. Nice, divisional things are atheist. Red, unsatiated things are healthy. All iritic things are unsatiated. If Britta is homely then Britta is unsatiated. If Mairead is divisional then Mairead is healthy. All divisional things are healthy. If something is atheist then it is tabu. Giffie is not divisional.", "logic": "\nAtheist(colbert)\nUnsatiated(colbert)\nHealthy(colbert)\nTabu(mairead)\nAtheist(mairead)\nUnsatiated(mairead)\nHealthy(mairead)\nIritic(mairead)\nHomely(mairead)\nDivisional(mairead)\nTabu(giffie)\nIritic(giffie)\nHomely(giffie)\nTabu(britta)\nAtheist(britta)\nIritic(britta)\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) and Divisional(x) -> Atheist(x))\nforall x (Homely(x) and Unsatiated(x) -> Healthy(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nHomely(britta) -> Unsatiated(britta)\nDivisional(mairead) -> Healthy(mairead)\nforall x (Divisional(x) -> Healthy(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Tabu(x))\n\nnot Divisional(giffie)\n\nnot Divisional(giffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Pepe is unerasable. Pepe is dishonored. Pepe is diluvian. Meaghan is hushed. Meaghan is unerasable. Meaghan is dishonored. Meaghan is diluvian. Meaghan is wolflike. Meaghan is scattered. Meaghan is testate. Cassandre is hushed. Cassandre is wolflike. Cassandre is scattered. Ninette is hushed. Ninette is unerasable. Ninette is wolflike. Cold things are wolflike. Nice, testate things are unerasable. Red, dishonored things are diluvian. All wolflike things are dishonored. If Ninette is scattered then Ninette is dishonored. If Meaghan is testate then Meaghan is diluvian. All testate things are diluvian. If something is unerasable then it is hushed. Ninette is scattered.", "logic": "\nUnerasable(pepe)\nDishonored(pepe)\nDiluvian(pepe)\nHushed(meaghan)\nUnerasable(meaghan)\nDishonored(meaghan)\nDiluvian(meaghan)\nWolflike(meaghan)\nScattered(meaghan)\nTestate(meaghan)\nHushed(cassandre)\nWolflike(cassandre)\nScattered(cassandre)\nHushed(ninette)\nUnerasable(ninette)\nWolflike(ninette)\nforall x (Unerasable(x) -> Wolflike(x))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) and Testate(x) -> Unerasable(x))\nforall x (Scattered(x) and Dishonored(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nScattered(ninette) -> Dishonored(ninette)\nTestate(meaghan) -> Diluvian(meaghan)\nforall x (Testate(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Unerasable(x) -> Hushed(x))\n\nScattered(ninette)\n\nScattered(ninette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Kingsley is algerian. Kingsley is rhomboid. Kingsley is unloving. Hermy is projected. Hermy is algerian. Hermy is rhomboid. Hermy is unloving. Hermy is endermatic. Hermy is clawlike. Hermy is reconciled. Tansy is projected. Tansy is endermatic. Tansy is clawlike. Jaquelyn is projected. Jaquelyn is algerian. Jaquelyn is endermatic. Cold things are endermatic. Nice, reconciled things are algerian. Red, rhomboid things are unloving. All endermatic things are rhomboid. If Jaquelyn is clawlike then Jaquelyn is rhomboid. If Hermy is reconciled then Hermy is unloving. All reconciled things are unloving. If something is algerian then it is projected. Kingsley is not reconciled.", "logic": "\nAlgerian(kingsley)\nRhomboid(kingsley)\nUnloving(kingsley)\nProjected(hermy)\nAlgerian(hermy)\nRhomboid(hermy)\nUnloving(hermy)\nEndermatic(hermy)\nClawlike(hermy)\nReconciled(hermy)\nProjected(tansy)\nEndermatic(tansy)\nClawlike(tansy)\nProjected(jaquelyn)\nAlgerian(jaquelyn)\nEndermatic(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Algerian(x) -> Endermatic(x))\nforall x (Endermatic(x) and Reconciled(x) -> Algerian(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and Rhomboid(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Rhomboid(x))\nClawlike(jaquelyn) -> Rhomboid(jaquelyn)\nReconciled(hermy) -> Unloving(hermy)\nforall x (Reconciled(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Algerian(x) -> Projected(x))\n\nnot Reconciled(kingsley)\n\nnot Reconciled(kingsley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Carsten is unclothed. Carsten is diligent. Carsten is stewed. Dean is squashed. Dean is unclothed. Dean is diligent. Dean is stewed. Dean is bodacious. Dean is fallow. Dean is triangular. Anurag is squashed. Anurag is bodacious. Anurag is fallow. Noam is squashed. Noam is unclothed. Noam is bodacious. Cold things are bodacious. Nice, triangular things are unclothed. Red, diligent things are stewed. All bodacious things are diligent. If Noam is fallow then Noam is diligent. If Dean is triangular then Dean is stewed. All triangular things are stewed. If something is unclothed then it is squashed. Carsten is fallow.", "logic": "\nUnclothed(carsten)\nDiligent(carsten)\nStewed(carsten)\nSquashed(dean)\nUnclothed(dean)\nDiligent(dean)\nStewed(dean)\nBodacious(dean)\nFallow(dean)\nTriangular(dean)\nSquashed(anurag)\nBodacious(anurag)\nFallow(anurag)\nSquashed(noam)\nUnclothed(noam)\nBodacious(noam)\nforall x (Unclothed(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and Triangular(x) -> Unclothed(x))\nforall x (Fallow(x) and Diligent(x) -> Stewed(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Diligent(x))\nFallow(noam) -> Diligent(noam)\nTriangular(dean) -> Stewed(dean)\nforall x (Triangular(x) -> Stewed(x))\nforall x (Unclothed(x) -> Squashed(x))\n\nFallow(carsten)\n\nFallow(carsten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1021"} {"premises": "Tonnie is unexcelled. Kind, ovular things are curable. If Tonnie is ovular and Tonnie is genteel then Tonnie is microbial. Kind things are ovular. Tonnie is unexcelled.", "logic": "\nUnexcelled(tonnie)\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) and Ovular(x) -> Curable(x))\nOvular(tonnie) and Genteel(tonnie) -> Microbial(tonnie)\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Ovular(x))\n\nUnexcelled(tonnie)\n\ntherefore Unexcelled(tonnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Vern is askant. Kind, elaborate things are gamey. If Vern is elaborate and Vern is otiose then Vern is sinkable. Kind things are elaborate. Vern is not askant.", "logic": "\nAskant(vern)\nforall x (Askant(x) and Elaborate(x) -> Gamey(x))\nElaborate(vern) and Otiose(vern) -> Sinkable(vern)\nforall x (Askant(x) -> Elaborate(x))\n\nnot Askant(vern)\n\ntherefore Askant(vern)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Elvin is curative. Kind, childish things are morose. If Elvin is childish and Elvin is gusseted then Elvin is sericeous. Kind things are childish. Elvin is childish.", "logic": "\nCurative(elvin)\nforall x (Curative(x) and Childish(x) -> Morose(x))\nChildish(elvin) and Gusseted(elvin) -> Sericeous(elvin)\nforall x (Curative(x) -> Childish(x))\n\nChildish(elvin)\n\nCurative(elvin) and forall x (Curative(x) -> Childish(x)) -> therefore Childish(elvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Jillene is operose. Kind, protozoic things are hobnailed. If Jillene is protozoic and Jillene is blistery then Jillene is apteral. Kind things are protozoic. Jillene is not protozoic.", "logic": "\nOperose(jillene)\nforall x (Operose(x) and Protozoic(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nProtozoic(jillene) and Blistery(jillene) -> Apteral(jillene)\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Protozoic(x))\n\nnot Protozoic(jillene)\n\nOperose(jillene) and forall x (Operose(x) -> Protozoic(x)) -> therefore Protozoic(jillene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Carrissa is malposed. Kind, nonviolent things are guarded. If Carrissa is nonviolent and Carrissa is frothing then Carrissa is controlled. Kind things are nonviolent. Carrissa is guarded.", "logic": "\nMalposed(carrissa)\nforall x (Malposed(x) and Nonviolent(x) -> Guarded(x))\nNonviolent(carrissa) and Frothing(carrissa) -> Controlled(carrissa)\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\n\nGuarded(carrissa)\n\nMalposed(carrissa) and forall x (Malposed(x) -> Nonviolent(x)) -> therefore Nonviolent(carrissa) Malposed(carrissa) and Nonviolent(carrissa) and forall x (Malposed(x) and Nonviolent(x) -> Guarded(x)) -> therefore Guarded(carrissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Cathy is involved. Kind, fashioned things are stemmed. If Cathy is fashioned and Cathy is sweptback then Cathy is eupneic. Kind things are fashioned. Cathy is not stemmed.", "logic": "\nInvolved(cathy)\nforall x (Involved(x) and Fashioned(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nFashioned(cathy) and Sweptback(cathy) -> Eupneic(cathy)\nforall x (Involved(x) -> Fashioned(x))\n\nnot Stemmed(cathy)\n\nInvolved(cathy) and forall x (Involved(x) -> Fashioned(x)) -> therefore Fashioned(cathy) Involved(cathy) and Fashioned(cathy) and forall x (Involved(x) and Fashioned(x) -> Stemmed(x)) -> therefore Stemmed(cathy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Sherye is cuneal. Kind, pietistic things are carpetbag. If Sherye is pietistic and Sherye is taillike then Sherye is astounded. Kind things are pietistic. Sherye is not astounded.", "logic": "\nCuneal(sherye)\nforall x (Cuneal(x) and Pietistic(x) -> Carpetbag(x))\nPietistic(sherye) and Taillike(sherye) -> Astounded(sherye)\nforall x (Cuneal(x) -> Pietistic(x))\n\nnot Astounded(sherye)\n\nPietistic(sherye) and Taillike(sherye) -> Astounded(sherye) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Odysseus is shimmery. Kind, roadless things are beamish. If Odysseus is roadless and Odysseus is baking then Odysseus is tenable. Kind things are roadless. Odysseus is nice.", "logic": "\nShimmery(odysseus)\nforall x (Shimmery(x) and Roadless(x) -> Beamish(x))\nRoadless(odysseus) and Baking(odysseus) -> Tenable(odysseus)\nforall x (Shimmery(x) -> Roadless(x))\n\nNice(odysseus)\n\nNice(odysseus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Blinny is ungummed. Kind, fortunate things are plaguey. If Blinny is fortunate and Blinny is floccose then Blinny is usual. Kind things are fortunate. Blinny is not green.", "logic": "\nUngummed(blinny)\nforall x (Ungummed(x) and Fortunate(x) -> Plaguey(x))\nFortunate(blinny) and Floccose(blinny) -> Usual(blinny)\nforall x (Ungummed(x) -> Fortunate(x))\n\nnot Green(blinny)\n\nnot Green(blinny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "Almira is void. Kind, placatory things are drooping. If Almira is placatory and Almira is villainous then Almira is cloisonne. Kind things are placatory. Almira is villainous.", "logic": "\nVoid(almira)\nforall x (Void(x) and Placatory(x) -> Drooping(x))\nPlacatory(almira) and Villainous(almira) -> Cloisonne(almira)\nforall x (Void(x) -> Placatory(x))\n\nVillainous(almira)\n\nVillainous(almira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-745"} {"premises": "The mindy fress the katerina. The mindy interdict the nollie. The mindy interdict the katerina. The nollie is not telling. The nollie fress the katerina. The nollie interdict the mindy. The nollie interdict the katerina. The katerina astringe the mindy. The katerina does not need the mindy. The katerina fress the nollie. If the nollie interdict the mindy then the mindy is port. Cold things are not telling. The mindy interdict the nollie.", "logic": "\nFress(mindy, katerina)\nInterdict(mindy, nollie)\nInterdict(mindy, katerina)\nnot Telling(nollie)\nFress(nollie, katerina)\nInterdict(nollie, mindy)\nInterdict(nollie, katerina)\nAstringe(katerina, mindy)\nnot Fress(katerina, mindy)\nFress(katerina, nollie)\nInterdict(nollie, mindy) -> Port(mindy)\nforall x (Port(x) -> not Telling(x))\n\nInterdict(mindy, nollie)\n\ntherefore Interdict(mindy, nollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The voltaire protest the geri. The voltaire thoriate the terri. The voltaire thoriate the geri. The terri is not bulbous. The terri protest the geri. The terri thoriate the voltaire. The terri thoriate the geri. The geri efface the voltaire. The geri does not need the voltaire. The geri protest the terri. If the terri thoriate the voltaire then the voltaire is guiltless. Cold things are not bulbous. The geri does not need the terri.", "logic": "\nProtest(voltaire, geri)\nThoriate(voltaire, terri)\nThoriate(voltaire, geri)\nnot Bulbous(terri)\nProtest(terri, geri)\nThoriate(terri, voltaire)\nThoriate(terri, geri)\nEfface(geri, voltaire)\nnot Protest(geri, voltaire)\nProtest(geri, terri)\nThoriate(terri, voltaire) -> Guiltless(voltaire)\nforall x (Guiltless(x) -> not Bulbous(x))\n\nnot Protest(geri, terri)\n\ntherefore Protest(geri, terri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The cherri teargas the delora. The cherri jive the giffard. The cherri jive the delora. The giffard is not grudging. The giffard teargas the delora. The giffard jive the cherri. The giffard jive the delora. The delora misguide the cherri. The delora does not need the cherri. The delora teargas the giffard. If the giffard jive the cherri then the cherri is placable. Cold things are not grudging. The cherri is placable.", "logic": "\nTeargas(cherri, delora)\nJive(cherri, giffard)\nJive(cherri, delora)\nnot Grudging(giffard)\nTeargas(giffard, delora)\nJive(giffard, cherri)\nJive(giffard, delora)\nMisguide(delora, cherri)\nnot Teargas(delora, cherri)\nTeargas(delora, giffard)\nJive(giffard, cherri) -> Placable(cherri)\nforall x (Placable(x) -> not Grudging(x))\n\nPlacable(cherri)\n\nJive(giffard, cherri) and Jive(giffard, cherri) -> Placable(cherri) -> therefore Placable(cherri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The aimee congest the ilise. The aimee stooge the dalenna. The aimee stooge the ilise. The dalenna is not close. The dalenna congest the ilise. The dalenna stooge the aimee. The dalenna stooge the ilise. The ilise enrapture the aimee. The ilise does not need the aimee. The ilise congest the dalenna. If the dalenna stooge the aimee then the aimee is hornless. Cold things are not close. The aimee is not hornless.", "logic": "\nCongest(aimee, ilise)\nStooge(aimee, dalenna)\nStooge(aimee, ilise)\nnot Close(dalenna)\nCongest(dalenna, ilise)\nStooge(dalenna, aimee)\nStooge(dalenna, ilise)\nEnrapture(ilise, aimee)\nnot Congest(ilise, aimee)\nCongest(ilise, dalenna)\nStooge(dalenna, aimee) -> Hornless(aimee)\nforall x (Hornless(x) -> not Close(x))\n\nnot Hornless(aimee)\n\nStooge(dalenna, aimee) and Stooge(dalenna, aimee) -> Hornless(aimee) -> therefore Hornless(aimee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The ulises slurp the charissa. The ulises dawn the krista. The ulises dawn the charissa. The krista is not earthbound. The krista slurp the charissa. The krista dawn the ulises. The krista dawn the charissa. The charissa trepan the ulises. The charissa does not need the ulises. The charissa slurp the krista. If the krista dawn the ulises then the ulises is retracted. Cold things are not earthbound. The ulises is not earthbound.", "logic": "\nSlurp(ulises, charissa)\nDawn(ulises, krista)\nDawn(ulises, charissa)\nnot Earthbound(krista)\nSlurp(krista, charissa)\nDawn(krista, ulises)\nDawn(krista, charissa)\nTrepan(charissa, ulises)\nnot Slurp(charissa, ulises)\nSlurp(charissa, krista)\nDawn(krista, ulises) -> Retracted(ulises)\nforall x (Retracted(x) -> not Earthbound(x))\n\nnot Earthbound(ulises)\n\nDawn(krista, ulises) and Dawn(krista, ulises) -> Retracted(ulises) -> therefore Retracted(ulises) Retracted(ulises) and forall x (Retracted(x) -> not Earthbound(x)) -> therefore not Earthbound(ulises)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The lurlene quibble the rupert. The lurlene inspire the morganne. The lurlene inspire the rupert. The morganne is not disorderly. The morganne quibble the rupert. The morganne inspire the lurlene. The morganne inspire the rupert. The rupert bandy the lurlene. The rupert does not need the lurlene. The rupert quibble the morganne. If the morganne inspire the lurlene then the lurlene is sabbatic. Cold things are not disorderly. The lurlene is disorderly.", "logic": "\nQuibble(lurlene, rupert)\nInspire(lurlene, morganne)\nInspire(lurlene, rupert)\nnot Disorderly(morganne)\nQuibble(morganne, rupert)\nInspire(morganne, lurlene)\nInspire(morganne, rupert)\nBandy(rupert, lurlene)\nnot Quibble(rupert, lurlene)\nQuibble(rupert, morganne)\nInspire(morganne, lurlene) -> Sabbatic(lurlene)\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> not Disorderly(x))\n\nDisorderly(lurlene)\n\nInspire(morganne, lurlene) and Inspire(morganne, lurlene) -> Sabbatic(lurlene) -> therefore Sabbatic(lurlene) Sabbatic(lurlene) and forall x (Sabbatic(x) -> not Disorderly(x)) -> therefore not Disorderly(lurlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The swen pacify the aveline. The swen follow the giffer. The swen follow the aveline. The giffer is not episcopal. The giffer pacify the aveline. The giffer follow the swen. The giffer follow the aveline. The aveline chaffer the swen. The aveline does not need the swen. The aveline pacify the giffer. If the giffer follow the swen then the swen is sensed. Cold things are not episcopal. The swen does not like the giffer.", "logic": "\nPacify(swen, aveline)\nFollow(swen, giffer)\nFollow(swen, aveline)\nnot Episcopal(giffer)\nPacify(giffer, aveline)\nFollow(giffer, swen)\nFollow(giffer, aveline)\nChaffer(aveline, swen)\nnot Pacify(aveline, swen)\nPacify(aveline, giffer)\nFollow(giffer, swen) -> Sensed(swen)\nforall x (Sensed(x) -> not Episcopal(x))\n\nnot Chaffer(swen, giffer)\n\nnot Chaffer(swen, giffer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The johanna odourise the worth. The johanna rout the gusty. The johanna rout the worth. The gusty is not fringy. The gusty odourise the worth. The gusty rout the johanna. The gusty rout the worth. The worth ticktock the johanna. The worth does not need the johanna. The worth odourise the gusty. If the gusty rout the johanna then the johanna is alliaceous. Cold things are not fringy. The johanna is young.", "logic": "\nOdourise(johanna, worth)\nRout(johanna, gusty)\nRout(johanna, worth)\nnot Fringy(gusty)\nOdourise(gusty, worth)\nRout(gusty, johanna)\nRout(gusty, worth)\nTicktock(worth, johanna)\nnot Odourise(worth, johanna)\nOdourise(worth, gusty)\nRout(gusty, johanna) -> Alliaceous(johanna)\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) -> not Fringy(x))\n\nYoung(johanna)\n\nYoung(johanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The muffin defat the eva. The muffin promenade the valeda. The muffin promenade the eva. The valeda is not fleet. The valeda defat the eva. The valeda promenade the muffin. The valeda promenade the eva. The eva abound the muffin. The eva does not need the muffin. The eva defat the valeda. If the valeda promenade the muffin then the muffin is pennate. Cold things are not fleet. The muffin does not see the muffin.", "logic": "\nDefat(muffin, eva)\nPromenade(muffin, valeda)\nPromenade(muffin, eva)\nnot Fleet(valeda)\nDefat(valeda, eva)\nPromenade(valeda, muffin)\nPromenade(valeda, eva)\nAbound(eva, muffin)\nnot Defat(eva, muffin)\nDefat(eva, valeda)\nPromenade(valeda, muffin) -> Pennate(muffin)\nforall x (Pennate(x) -> not Fleet(x))\n\nnot Promenade(muffin, muffin)\n\nnot Promenade(muffin, muffin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The giancarlo forefend the maren. The giancarlo regorge the haydon. The giancarlo regorge the maren. The haydon is not crapulous. The haydon forefend the maren. The haydon regorge the giancarlo. The haydon regorge the maren. The maren invoke the giancarlo. The maren does not need the giancarlo. The maren forefend the haydon. If the haydon regorge the giancarlo then the giancarlo is caespitose. Cold things are not crapulous. The haydon invoke the maren.", "logic": "\nForefend(giancarlo, maren)\nRegorge(giancarlo, haydon)\nRegorge(giancarlo, maren)\nnot Crapulous(haydon)\nForefend(haydon, maren)\nRegorge(haydon, giancarlo)\nRegorge(haydon, maren)\nInvoke(maren, giancarlo)\nnot Forefend(maren, giancarlo)\nForefend(maren, haydon)\nRegorge(haydon, giancarlo) -> Caespitose(giancarlo)\nforall x (Caespitose(x) -> not Crapulous(x))\n\nInvoke(haydon, maren)\n\nInvoke(haydon, maren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The carita climb the leontine. The carita westernize the joell. The carita westernize the leontine. The joell is not seven. The joell climb the leontine. The joell westernize the carita. The joell westernize the leontine. The leontine attenuate the carita. The leontine does not need the carita. The leontine climb the joell. If the joell westernize the carita then the carita is menial. Cold things are not seven. The leontine does not need the leontine.", "logic": "\nClimb(carita, leontine)\nWesternize(carita, joell)\nWesternize(carita, leontine)\nnot Seven(joell)\nClimb(joell, leontine)\nWesternize(joell, carita)\nWesternize(joell, leontine)\nAttenuate(leontine, carita)\nnot Climb(leontine, carita)\nClimb(leontine, joell)\nWesternize(joell, carita) -> Menial(carita)\nforall x (Menial(x) -> not Seven(x))\n\nnot Climb(leontine, leontine)\n\nnot Climb(leontine, leontine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "The cole aliment the georg. The cole whinny the truman. The cole whinny the georg. The truman is not displeased. The truman aliment the georg. The truman whinny the cole. The truman whinny the georg. The georg undercoat the cole. The georg does not need the cole. The georg aliment the truman. If the truman whinny the cole then the cole is creamy. Cold things are not displeased. The truman undercoat the cole.", "logic": "\nAliment(cole, georg)\nWhinny(cole, truman)\nWhinny(cole, georg)\nnot Displeased(truman)\nAliment(truman, georg)\nWhinny(truman, cole)\nWhinny(truman, georg)\nUndercoat(georg, cole)\nnot Aliment(georg, cole)\nAliment(georg, truman)\nWhinny(truman, cole) -> Creamy(cole)\nforall x (Creamy(x) -> not Displeased(x))\n\nUndercoat(truman, cole)\n\nUndercoat(truman, cole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1901"} {"premises": "Pamelina is brushed. Floria is chimeral. Floria is squandered. Floria is pinnate. Floria is emarginate. Whit is amphoteric. Whit is residual. Whit is emarginate. Ingelbert is residual. Ingelbert is squandered. All residual things are emarginate. Round things are amphoteric. Green things are chimeral. White, emarginate things are brushed. If Floria is pinnate and Floria is emarginate then Floria is amphoteric. Young things are brushed. If something is pinnate and emarginate then it is amphoteric. White things are chimeral. Whit is residual.", "logic": "\nBrushed(pamelina)\nChimeral(floria)\nSquandered(floria)\nPinnate(floria)\nEmarginate(floria)\nAmphoteric(whit)\nResidual(whit)\nEmarginate(whit)\nResidual(ingelbert)\nSquandered(ingelbert)\nforall x (Residual(x) -> Emarginate(x))\nforall x (Squandered(x) -> Amphoteric(x))\nforall x (Residual(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nforall x (Pinnate(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Brushed(x))\nPinnate(floria) and Emarginate(floria) -> Amphoteric(floria)\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Brushed(x))\nforall x (Pinnate(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Amphoteric(x))\nforall x (Pinnate(x) -> Chimeral(x))\n\nResidual(whit)\n\ntherefore Residual(whit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Sallie is painted. Chevalier is trackable. Chevalier is stormbound. Chevalier is reportable. Chevalier is afebrile. Veronica is acronymous. Veronica is lovesick. Veronica is afebrile. Jasmin is lovesick. Jasmin is stormbound. All lovesick things are afebrile. Round things are acronymous. Green things are trackable. White, afebrile things are painted. If Chevalier is reportable and Chevalier is afebrile then Chevalier is acronymous. Young things are painted. If something is reportable and afebrile then it is acronymous. White things are trackable. Chevalier is not stormbound.", "logic": "\nPainted(sallie)\nTrackable(chevalier)\nStormbound(chevalier)\nReportable(chevalier)\nAfebrile(chevalier)\nAcronymous(veronica)\nLovesick(veronica)\nAfebrile(veronica)\nLovesick(jasmin)\nStormbound(jasmin)\nforall x (Lovesick(x) -> Afebrile(x))\nforall x (Stormbound(x) -> Acronymous(x))\nforall x (Lovesick(x) -> Trackable(x))\nforall x (Reportable(x) and Afebrile(x) -> Painted(x))\nReportable(chevalier) and Afebrile(chevalier) -> Acronymous(chevalier)\nforall x (Afebrile(x) -> Painted(x))\nforall x (Reportable(x) and Afebrile(x) -> Acronymous(x))\nforall x (Reportable(x) -> Trackable(x))\n\nnot Stormbound(chevalier)\n\ntherefore Stormbound(chevalier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Helsa is waxed. Vicki is grumbling. Vicki is torulose. Vicki is famed. Vicki is unworthy. Zonda is excitable. Zonda is stimulant. Zonda is unworthy. Kaitlin is stimulant. Kaitlin is torulose. All stimulant things are unworthy. Round things are excitable. Green things are grumbling. White, unworthy things are waxed. If Vicki is famed and Vicki is unworthy then Vicki is excitable. Young things are waxed. If something is famed and unworthy then it is excitable. White things are grumbling. Kaitlin is excitable.", "logic": "\nWaxed(helsa)\nGrumbling(vicki)\nTorulose(vicki)\nFamed(vicki)\nUnworthy(vicki)\nExcitable(zonda)\nStimulant(zonda)\nUnworthy(zonda)\nStimulant(kaitlin)\nTorulose(kaitlin)\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nforall x (Torulose(x) -> Excitable(x))\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> Grumbling(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Waxed(x))\nFamed(vicki) and Unworthy(vicki) -> Excitable(vicki)\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Waxed(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Excitable(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) -> Grumbling(x))\n\nExcitable(kaitlin)\n\nTorulose(kaitlin) and forall x (Torulose(x) -> Excitable(x)) -> therefore Excitable(kaitlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Sharai is argent. Amalee is funny. Amalee is satyric. Amalee is unpompous. Amalee is frigid. Tabitha is mercerized. Tabitha is voluntary. Tabitha is frigid. Aurelia is voluntary. Aurelia is satyric. All voluntary things are frigid. Round things are mercerized. Green things are funny. White, frigid things are argent. If Amalee is unpompous and Amalee is frigid then Amalee is mercerized. Young things are argent. If something is unpompous and frigid then it is mercerized. White things are funny. Aurelia is not funny.", "logic": "\nArgent(sharai)\nFunny(amalee)\nSatyric(amalee)\nUnpompous(amalee)\nFrigid(amalee)\nMercerized(tabitha)\nVoluntary(tabitha)\nFrigid(tabitha)\nVoluntary(aurelia)\nSatyric(aurelia)\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Frigid(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Mercerized(x))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Funny(x))\nforall x (Unpompous(x) and Frigid(x) -> Argent(x))\nUnpompous(amalee) and Frigid(amalee) -> Mercerized(amalee)\nforall x (Frigid(x) -> Argent(x))\nforall x (Unpompous(x) and Frigid(x) -> Mercerized(x))\nforall x (Unpompous(x) -> Funny(x))\n\nnot Funny(aurelia)\n\nVoluntary(aurelia) and forall x (Voluntary(x) -> Funny(x)) -> therefore Funny(aurelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Melly is afflictive. Ivette is pied. Ivette is flaky. Ivette is prenuptial. Ivette is deaf. Tremayne is welfarist. Tremayne is unwrinkled. Tremayne is deaf. Maury is unwrinkled. Maury is flaky. All unwrinkled things are deaf. Round things are welfarist. Green things are pied. White, deaf things are afflictive. If Ivette is prenuptial and Ivette is deaf then Ivette is welfarist. Young things are afflictive. If something is prenuptial and deaf then it is welfarist. White things are pied. Maury is afflictive.", "logic": "\nAfflictive(melly)\nPied(ivette)\nFlaky(ivette)\nPrenuptial(ivette)\nDeaf(ivette)\nWelfarist(tremayne)\nUnwrinkled(tremayne)\nDeaf(tremayne)\nUnwrinkled(maury)\nFlaky(maury)\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Flaky(x) -> Welfarist(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Pied(x))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) and Deaf(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nPrenuptial(ivette) and Deaf(ivette) -> Welfarist(ivette)\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) and Deaf(x) -> Welfarist(x))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) -> Pied(x))\n\nAfflictive(maury)\n\nUnwrinkled(maury) and forall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Deaf(x)) -> therefore Deaf(maury) Deaf(maury) and forall x (Deaf(x) -> Afflictive(x)) -> therefore Afflictive(maury)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Tobey is meddling. Shelly is uniparous. Shelly is unspecific. Shelly is prototypic. Shelly is styptic. Carmella is deplorable. Carmella is midland. Carmella is styptic. Weber is midland. Weber is unspecific. All midland things are styptic. Round things are deplorable. Green things are uniparous. White, styptic things are meddling. If Shelly is prototypic and Shelly is styptic then Shelly is deplorable. Young things are meddling. If something is prototypic and styptic then it is deplorable. White things are uniparous. Weber is not meddling.", "logic": "\nMeddling(tobey)\nUniparous(shelly)\nUnspecific(shelly)\nPrototypic(shelly)\nStyptic(shelly)\nDeplorable(carmella)\nMidland(carmella)\nStyptic(carmella)\nMidland(weber)\nUnspecific(weber)\nforall x (Midland(x) -> Styptic(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) -> Deplorable(x))\nforall x (Midland(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Prototypic(x) and Styptic(x) -> Meddling(x))\nPrototypic(shelly) and Styptic(shelly) -> Deplorable(shelly)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Meddling(x))\nforall x (Prototypic(x) and Styptic(x) -> Deplorable(x))\nforall x (Prototypic(x) -> Uniparous(x))\n\nnot Meddling(weber)\n\nMidland(weber) and forall x (Midland(x) -> Styptic(x)) -> therefore Styptic(weber) Styptic(weber) and forall x (Styptic(x) -> Meddling(x)) -> therefore Meddling(weber)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Carlo is gold. Amber is heathen. Amber is salable. Amber is professed. Amber is faustian. Elfreda is vibrant. Elfreda is unbound. Elfreda is faustian. Evaleen is unbound. Evaleen is salable. All unbound things are faustian. Round things are vibrant. Green things are heathen. White, faustian things are gold. If Amber is professed and Amber is faustian then Amber is vibrant. Young things are gold. If something is professed and faustian then it is vibrant. White things are heathen. Carlo is not vibrant.", "logic": "\nGold(carlo)\nHeathen(amber)\nSalable(amber)\nProfessed(amber)\nFaustian(amber)\nVibrant(elfreda)\nUnbound(elfreda)\nFaustian(elfreda)\nUnbound(evaleen)\nSalable(evaleen)\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Salable(x) -> Vibrant(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Heathen(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) and Faustian(x) -> Gold(x))\nProfessed(amber) and Faustian(amber) -> Vibrant(amber)\nforall x (Faustian(x) -> Gold(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) and Faustian(x) -> Vibrant(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) -> Heathen(x))\n\nnot Vibrant(carlo)\n\nforall x (Salable(x) -> Vibrant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Nathalie is lubberly. Judie is mint. Judie is ensiform. Judie is localised. Judie is snakelike. Sayre is jumentous. Sayre is quenchless. Sayre is snakelike. Babs is quenchless. Babs is ensiform. All quenchless things are snakelike. Round things are jumentous. Green things are mint. White, snakelike things are lubberly. If Judie is localised and Judie is snakelike then Judie is jumentous. Young things are lubberly. If something is localised and snakelike then it is jumentous. White things are mint. Nathalie is snakelike.", "logic": "\nLubberly(nathalie)\nMint(judie)\nEnsiform(judie)\nLocalised(judie)\nSnakelike(judie)\nJumentous(sayre)\nQuenchless(sayre)\nSnakelike(sayre)\nQuenchless(babs)\nEnsiform(babs)\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nforall x (Ensiform(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> Mint(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) and Snakelike(x) -> Lubberly(x))\nLocalised(judie) and Snakelike(judie) -> Jumentous(judie)\nforall x (Snakelike(x) -> Lubberly(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) and Snakelike(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) -> Mint(x))\n\nSnakelike(nathalie)\n\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> Snakelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Ruthann is reddened. Marrilee is tranquil. Marrilee is blate. Marrilee is orbitual. Marrilee is waterproof. Percival is reddened. Percival is choppy. Percival is waterproof. Emlynne is choppy. Emlynne is blate. All choppy things are waterproof. Round things are reddened. Green things are tranquil. White, waterproof things are reddened. If Marrilee is orbitual and Marrilee is waterproof then Marrilee is reddened. Young things are reddened. If something is orbitual and waterproof then it is reddened. White things are tranquil. Ruthann is not tranquil.", "logic": "\nReddened(ruthann)\nTranquil(marrilee)\nBlate(marrilee)\nOrbitual(marrilee)\nWaterproof(marrilee)\nReddened(percival)\nChoppy(percival)\nWaterproof(percival)\nChoppy(emlynne)\nBlate(emlynne)\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Waterproof(x))\nforall x (Blate(x) -> Reddened(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Tranquil(x))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) and Waterproof(x) -> Reddened(x))\nOrbitual(marrilee) and Waterproof(marrilee) -> Reddened(marrilee)\nforall x (Waterproof(x) -> Reddened(x))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) and Waterproof(x) -> Reddened(x))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Tranquil(x))\n\nnot Tranquil(ruthann)\n\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Tranquil(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Rhoda is unbolted. Myrtia is embryonal. Myrtia is equine. Myrtia is elective. Myrtia is aseptic. Tamiko is shouted. Tamiko is colorfast. Tamiko is aseptic. Bridgette is colorfast. Bridgette is equine. All colorfast things are aseptic. Round things are shouted. Green things are embryonal. White, aseptic things are unbolted. If Myrtia is elective and Myrtia is aseptic then Myrtia is shouted. Young things are unbolted. If something is elective and aseptic then it is shouted. White things are embryonal. Rhoda is elective.", "logic": "\nUnbolted(rhoda)\nEmbryonal(myrtia)\nEquine(myrtia)\nElective(myrtia)\nAseptic(myrtia)\nShouted(tamiko)\nColorfast(tamiko)\nAseptic(tamiko)\nColorfast(bridgette)\nEquine(bridgette)\nforall x (Colorfast(x) -> Aseptic(x))\nforall x (Equine(x) -> Shouted(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) -> Embryonal(x))\nforall x (Elective(x) and Aseptic(x) -> Unbolted(x))\nElective(myrtia) and Aseptic(myrtia) -> Shouted(myrtia)\nforall x (Aseptic(x) -> Unbolted(x))\nforall x (Elective(x) and Aseptic(x) -> Shouted(x))\nforall x (Elective(x) -> Embryonal(x))\n\nElective(rhoda)\n\nElective(rhoda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Claudia is snub. Rozanne is expected. Rozanne is agitating. Rozanne is bulbed. Rozanne is clueless. Hagan is chalybeate. Hagan is auriculate. Hagan is clueless. Helaina is auriculate. Helaina is agitating. All auriculate things are clueless. Round things are chalybeate. Green things are expected. White, clueless things are snub. If Rozanne is bulbed and Rozanne is clueless then Rozanne is chalybeate. Young things are snub. If something is bulbed and clueless then it is chalybeate. White things are expected. Rozanne is not auriculate.", "logic": "\nSnub(claudia)\nExpected(rozanne)\nAgitating(rozanne)\nBulbed(rozanne)\nClueless(rozanne)\nChalybeate(hagan)\nAuriculate(hagan)\nClueless(hagan)\nAuriculate(helaina)\nAgitating(helaina)\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Agitating(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Expected(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) and Clueless(x) -> Snub(x))\nBulbed(rozanne) and Clueless(rozanne) -> Chalybeate(rozanne)\nforall x (Clueless(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) and Clueless(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) -> Expected(x))\n\nnot Auriculate(rozanne)\n\nnot Auriculate(rozanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "Baron is cresson. Waneta is levorotary. Waneta is postpartum. Waneta is basophilic. Waneta is unawed. Bailie is sheared. Bailie is respective. Bailie is unawed. Rita is respective. Rita is postpartum. All respective things are unawed. Round things are sheared. Green things are levorotary. White, unawed things are cresson. If Waneta is basophilic and Waneta is unawed then Waneta is sheared. Young things are cresson. If something is basophilic and unawed then it is sheared. White things are levorotary. Baron is respective.", "logic": "\nCresson(baron)\nLevorotary(waneta)\nPostpartum(waneta)\nBasophilic(waneta)\nUnawed(waneta)\nSheared(bailie)\nRespective(bailie)\nUnawed(bailie)\nRespective(rita)\nPostpartum(rita)\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Unawed(x))\nforall x (Postpartum(x) -> Sheared(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Levorotary(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) and Unawed(x) -> Cresson(x))\nBasophilic(waneta) and Unawed(waneta) -> Sheared(waneta)\nforall x (Unawed(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) and Unawed(x) -> Sheared(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) -> Levorotary(x))\n\nRespective(baron)\n\nRespective(baron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2209"} {"premises": "The joselyn relieve the aurore. The aurore dissect the maddy. The maddy is not bluish. If someone relieve the maddy then the maddy is grammatic. If someone relieve the aurore and the aurore dissect the joselyn then they see the joselyn. If someone is antimonial then they see the maddy. If someone relieve the aurore then they are antimonial. If someone relieve the aurore then they are unfeminine. If the aurore relieve the maddy and the aurore is not antimonial then the aurore does not like the maddy. The aurore dissect the maddy.", "logic": "\nRelieve(joselyn, aurore)\nDissect(aurore, maddy)\nnot Bluish(maddy)\nforall x (Relieve(x, maddy) -> Grammatic(maddy))\nforall x (Relieve(x, aurore) and Dissect(aurore, joselyn) -> Relieve(x, joselyn))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Relieve(x, maddy))\nforall x (Relieve(x, aurore) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Relieve(x, aurore) -> Unfeminine(x))\nRelieve(aurore, maddy) and not Antimonial(aurore) -> not Politicise(aurore, maddy)\n\nDissect(aurore, maddy)\n\ntherefore Dissect(aurore, maddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The merrile submarine the farica. The farica bale the klee. The klee is not bone. If someone submarine the klee then the klee is cottony. If someone submarine the farica and the farica bale the merrile then they see the merrile. If someone is aeronautic then they see the klee. If someone submarine the farica then they are aeronautic. If someone submarine the farica then they are branchial. If the farica submarine the klee and the farica is not aeronautic then the farica does not like the klee. The klee is bone.", "logic": "\nSubmarine(merrile, farica)\nBale(farica, klee)\nnot Bone(klee)\nforall x (Submarine(x, klee) -> Cottony(klee))\nforall x (Submarine(x, farica) and Bale(farica, merrile) -> Submarine(x, merrile))\nforall x (Aeronautic(x) -> Submarine(x, klee))\nforall x (Submarine(x, farica) -> Aeronautic(x))\nforall x (Submarine(x, farica) -> Branchial(x))\nSubmarine(farica, klee) and not Aeronautic(farica) -> not Civilize(farica, klee)\n\nBone(klee)\n\ntherefore not Bone(klee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The rice impose the leandra. The leandra overdress the taddeo. The taddeo is not addictive. If someone impose the taddeo then the taddeo is confused. If someone impose the leandra and the leandra overdress the rice then they see the rice. If someone is vicarial then they see the taddeo. If someone impose the leandra then they are vicarial. If someone impose the leandra then they are unctuous. If the leandra impose the taddeo and the leandra is not vicarial then the leandra does not like the taddeo. The rice is unctuous.", "logic": "\nImpose(rice, leandra)\nOverdress(leandra, taddeo)\nnot Addictive(taddeo)\nforall x (Impose(x, taddeo) -> Confused(taddeo))\nforall x (Impose(x, leandra) and Overdress(leandra, rice) -> Impose(x, rice))\nforall x (Vicarial(x) -> Impose(x, taddeo))\nforall x (Impose(x, leandra) -> Vicarial(x))\nforall x (Impose(x, leandra) -> Unctuous(x))\nImpose(leandra, taddeo) and not Vicarial(leandra) -> not Ticktack(leandra, taddeo)\n\nUnctuous(rice)\n\nImpose(rice, leandra) and forall x (Impose(x, leandra) -> Unctuous(x)) -> therefore Unctuous(rice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The eula marinade the marko. The marko inure the arly. The arly is not cxlv. If someone marinade the arly then the arly is hawkish. If someone marinade the marko and the marko inure the eula then they see the eula. If someone is centrical then they see the arly. If someone marinade the marko then they are centrical. If someone marinade the marko then they are critical. If the marko marinade the arly and the marko is not centrical then the marko does not like the arly. The eula is not centrical.", "logic": "\nMarinade(eula, marko)\nInure(marko, arly)\nnot Cxlv(arly)\nforall x (Marinade(x, arly) -> Hawkish(arly))\nforall x (Marinade(x, marko) and Inure(marko, eula) -> Marinade(x, eula))\nforall x (Centrical(x) -> Marinade(x, arly))\nforall x (Marinade(x, marko) -> Centrical(x))\nforall x (Marinade(x, marko) -> Critical(x))\nMarinade(marko, arly) and not Centrical(marko) -> not Outsource(marko, arly)\n\nnot Centrical(eula)\n\nMarinade(eula, marko) and forall x (Marinade(x, marko) -> Centrical(x)) -> therefore Centrical(eula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The martyn gather the alice. The alice fetishize the misty. The misty is not uneager. If someone gather the misty then the misty is beneficed. If someone gather the alice and the alice fetishize the martyn then they see the martyn. If someone is spoken then they see the misty. If someone gather the alice then they are spoken. If someone gather the alice then they are hadal. If the alice gather the misty and the alice is not spoken then the alice does not like the misty. The martyn gather the misty.", "logic": "\nGather(martyn, alice)\nFetishize(alice, misty)\nnot Uneager(misty)\nforall x (Gather(x, misty) -> Beneficed(misty))\nforall x (Gather(x, alice) and Fetishize(alice, martyn) -> Gather(x, martyn))\nforall x (Spoken(x) -> Gather(x, misty))\nforall x (Gather(x, alice) -> Spoken(x))\nforall x (Gather(x, alice) -> Hadal(x))\nGather(alice, misty) and not Spoken(alice) -> not Exclaim(alice, misty)\n\nGather(martyn, misty)\n\nGather(martyn, alice) and forall x (Gather(x, alice) -> Spoken(x)) -> therefore Spoken(martyn) Spoken(martyn) and forall x (Spoken(x) -> Gather(x, misty)) -> therefore Gather(martyn, misty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The ursala laugh the shantee. The shantee skirl the dotty. The dotty is not ranked. If someone laugh the dotty then the dotty is toed. If someone laugh the shantee and the shantee skirl the ursala then they see the ursala. If someone is autonomic then they see the dotty. If someone laugh the shantee then they are autonomic. If someone laugh the shantee then they are deboned. If the shantee laugh the dotty and the shantee is not autonomic then the shantee does not like the dotty. The ursala does not see the dotty.", "logic": "\nLaugh(ursala, shantee)\nSkirl(shantee, dotty)\nnot Ranked(dotty)\nforall x (Laugh(x, dotty) -> Toed(dotty))\nforall x (Laugh(x, shantee) and Skirl(shantee, ursala) -> Laugh(x, ursala))\nforall x (Autonomic(x) -> Laugh(x, dotty))\nforall x (Laugh(x, shantee) -> Autonomic(x))\nforall x (Laugh(x, shantee) -> Deboned(x))\nLaugh(shantee, dotty) and not Autonomic(shantee) -> not Grill(shantee, dotty)\n\nnot Laugh(ursala, dotty)\n\nLaugh(ursala, shantee) and forall x (Laugh(x, shantee) -> Autonomic(x)) -> therefore Autonomic(ursala) Autonomic(ursala) and forall x (Autonomic(x) -> Laugh(x, dotty)) -> therefore Laugh(ursala, dotty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The lyndsey hoist the eustacia. The eustacia outcry the oswell. The oswell is not folksy. If someone hoist the oswell then the oswell is ameban. If someone hoist the eustacia and the eustacia outcry the lyndsey then they see the lyndsey. If someone is invincible then they see the oswell. If someone hoist the eustacia then they are invincible. If someone hoist the eustacia then they are impellent. If the eustacia hoist the oswell and the eustacia is not invincible then the eustacia does not like the oswell. The lyndsey does not see the lyndsey.", "logic": "\nHoist(lyndsey, eustacia)\nOutcry(eustacia, oswell)\nnot Folksy(oswell)\nforall x (Hoist(x, oswell) -> Ameban(oswell))\nforall x (Hoist(x, eustacia) and Outcry(eustacia, lyndsey) -> Hoist(x, lyndsey))\nforall x (Invincible(x) -> Hoist(x, oswell))\nforall x (Hoist(x, eustacia) -> Invincible(x))\nforall x (Hoist(x, eustacia) -> Impellent(x))\nHoist(eustacia, oswell) and not Invincible(eustacia) -> not Flush(eustacia, oswell)\n\nnot Hoist(lyndsey, lyndsey)\n\nforall x (Hoist(x, eustacia) and Outcry(eustacia, lyndsey) -> Hoist(x, lyndsey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The brady constitute the libbi. The libbi jilt the johnna. The johnna is not postmodern. If someone constitute the johnna then the johnna is vigilant. If someone constitute the libbi and the libbi jilt the brady then they see the brady. If someone is emphasised then they see the johnna. If someone constitute the libbi then they are emphasised. If someone constitute the libbi then they are redbrick. If the libbi constitute the johnna and the libbi is not emphasised then the libbi does not like the johnna. The johnna constitute the brady.", "logic": "\nConstitute(brady, libbi)\nJilt(libbi, johnna)\nnot Postmodern(johnna)\nforall x (Constitute(x, johnna) -> Vigilant(johnna))\nforall x (Constitute(x, libbi) and Jilt(libbi, brady) -> Constitute(x, brady))\nforall x (Emphasised(x) -> Constitute(x, johnna))\nforall x (Constitute(x, libbi) -> Emphasised(x))\nforall x (Constitute(x, libbi) -> Redbrick(x))\nConstitute(libbi, johnna) and not Emphasised(libbi) -> not Foist(libbi, johnna)\n\nConstitute(johnna, brady)\n\nforall x (Constitute(x, libbi) and Jilt(libbi, brady) -> Constitute(x, brady)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The minna abstract the demetrius. The demetrius bolshevize the nicoli. The nicoli is not fused. If someone abstract the nicoli then the nicoli is ilxxx. If someone abstract the demetrius and the demetrius bolshevize the minna then they see the minna. If someone is polemical then they see the nicoli. If someone abstract the demetrius then they are polemical. If someone abstract the demetrius then they are plantar. If the demetrius abstract the nicoli and the demetrius is not polemical then the demetrius does not like the nicoli. The nicoli is not plantar.", "logic": "\nAbstract(minna, demetrius)\nBolshevize(demetrius, nicoli)\nnot Fused(nicoli)\nforall x (Abstract(x, nicoli) -> Ilxxx(nicoli))\nforall x (Abstract(x, demetrius) and Bolshevize(demetrius, minna) -> Abstract(x, minna))\nforall x (Polemical(x) -> Abstract(x, nicoli))\nforall x (Abstract(x, demetrius) -> Polemical(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x, demetrius) -> Plantar(x))\nAbstract(demetrius, nicoli) and not Polemical(demetrius) -> not Joust(demetrius, nicoli)\n\nnot Plantar(nicoli)\n\nforall x (Abstract(x, demetrius) -> Plantar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The verena tinker the cordelie. The cordelie angle the ransom. The ransom is not bentonitic. If someone tinker the ransom then the ransom is rapturous. If someone tinker the cordelie and the cordelie angle the verena then they see the verena. If someone is luxe then they see the ransom. If someone tinker the cordelie then they are luxe. If someone tinker the cordelie then they are rightish. If the cordelie tinker the ransom and the cordelie is not luxe then the cordelie does not like the ransom. The cordelie bathe the verena.", "logic": "\nTinker(verena, cordelie)\nAngle(cordelie, ransom)\nnot Bentonitic(ransom)\nforall x (Tinker(x, ransom) -> Rapturous(ransom))\nforall x (Tinker(x, cordelie) and Angle(cordelie, verena) -> Tinker(x, verena))\nforall x (Luxe(x) -> Tinker(x, ransom))\nforall x (Tinker(x, cordelie) -> Luxe(x))\nforall x (Tinker(x, cordelie) -> Rightish(x))\nTinker(cordelie, ransom) and not Luxe(cordelie) -> not Bathe(cordelie, ransom)\n\nBathe(cordelie, verena)\n\nBathe(cordelie, verena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The boyce come the valentia. The valentia foresee the delbert. The delbert is not honored. If someone come the delbert then the delbert is sliding. If someone come the valentia and the valentia foresee the boyce then they see the boyce. If someone is strait then they see the delbert. If someone come the valentia then they are strait. If someone come the valentia then they are catarrhal. If the valentia come the delbert and the valentia is not strait then the valentia does not like the delbert. The valentia is not sliding.", "logic": "\nCome(boyce, valentia)\nForesee(valentia, delbert)\nnot Honored(delbert)\nforall x (Come(x, delbert) -> Sliding(delbert))\nforall x (Come(x, valentia) and Foresee(valentia, boyce) -> Come(x, boyce))\nforall x (Strait(x) -> Come(x, delbert))\nforall x (Come(x, valentia) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Come(x, valentia) -> Catarrhal(x))\nCome(valentia, delbert) and not Strait(valentia) -> not Supersede(valentia, delbert)\n\nnot Sliding(valentia)\n\nnot Sliding(valentia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The webb affix the mame. The mame scamp the magnum. The magnum is not meddlesome. If someone affix the magnum then the magnum is compelling. If someone affix the mame and the mame scamp the webb then they see the webb. If someone is unfree then they see the magnum. If someone affix the mame then they are unfree. If someone affix the mame then they are subalpine. If the mame affix the magnum and the mame is not unfree then the mame does not like the magnum. The mame is meddlesome.", "logic": "\nAffix(webb, mame)\nScamp(mame, magnum)\nnot Meddlesome(magnum)\nforall x (Affix(x, magnum) -> Compelling(magnum))\nforall x (Affix(x, mame) and Scamp(mame, webb) -> Affix(x, webb))\nforall x (Unfree(x) -> Affix(x, magnum))\nforall x (Affix(x, mame) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Affix(x, mame) -> Subalpine(x))\nAffix(mame, magnum) and not Unfree(mame) -> not Caper(mame, magnum)\n\nMeddlesome(mame)\n\nMeddlesome(mame) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Theo is parenteral. Theo is teenaged. Bari is parenteral. Bari is sepulchral. Audre is teenaged. Ignazio is parenteral. Ignazio is tiddly. White, teenaged things are tiddly. If something is tiddly and parenteral then it is ready. If something is ready then it is hidrotic. All hidrotic, ready things are sepulchral. White, teenaged things are hidrotic. If something is sepulchral and parenteral then it is tiddly. If Audre is hidrotic then Audre is teenaged. If Bari is teenaged and Bari is parenteral then Bari is ready. Theo is parenteral.", "logic": "\nParenteral(theo)\nTeenaged(theo)\nParenteral(bari)\nSepulchral(bari)\nTeenaged(audre)\nParenteral(ignazio)\nTiddly(ignazio)\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and Teenaged(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Tiddly(x) and Parenteral(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Ready(x) -> Hidrotic(x))\nforall x (Hidrotic(x) and Ready(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and Teenaged(x) -> Hidrotic(x))\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and Parenteral(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nHidrotic(audre) -> Teenaged(audre)\nTeenaged(bari) and Parenteral(bari) -> Ready(bari)\n\nParenteral(theo)\n\ntherefore Parenteral(theo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Junette is completing. Junette is nephritic. Buck is completing. Buck is fragile. Eugine is nephritic. Lucille is completing. Lucille is sidereal. White, nephritic things are sidereal. If something is sidereal and completing then it is relieved. If something is relieved then it is batholitic. All batholitic, relieved things are fragile. White, nephritic things are batholitic. If something is fragile and completing then it is sidereal. If Eugine is batholitic then Eugine is nephritic. If Buck is nephritic and Buck is completing then Buck is relieved. Junette is not nephritic.", "logic": "\nCompleting(junette)\nNephritic(junette)\nCompleting(buck)\nFragile(buck)\nNephritic(eugine)\nCompleting(lucille)\nSidereal(lucille)\nforall x (Fragile(x) and Nephritic(x) -> Sidereal(x))\nforall x (Sidereal(x) and Completing(x) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Batholitic(x))\nforall x (Batholitic(x) and Relieved(x) -> Fragile(x))\nforall x (Fragile(x) and Nephritic(x) -> Batholitic(x))\nforall x (Fragile(x) and Completing(x) -> Sidereal(x))\nBatholitic(eugine) -> Nephritic(eugine)\nNephritic(buck) and Completing(buck) -> Relieved(buck)\n\nnot Nephritic(junette)\n\ntherefore Nephritic(junette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Scotty is southwest. Scotty is inelegant. Inessa is southwest. Inessa is unkeyed. Katleen is inelegant. Sibilla is southwest. Sibilla is unsinkable. White, inelegant things are unsinkable. If something is unsinkable and southwest then it is brattish. If something is brattish then it is tined. All tined, brattish things are unkeyed. White, inelegant things are tined. If something is unkeyed and southwest then it is unsinkable. If Katleen is tined then Katleen is inelegant. If Inessa is inelegant and Inessa is southwest then Inessa is brattish. Inessa is unsinkable.", "logic": "\nSouthwest(scotty)\nInelegant(scotty)\nSouthwest(inessa)\nUnkeyed(inessa)\nInelegant(katleen)\nSouthwest(sibilla)\nUnsinkable(sibilla)\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) and Inelegant(x) -> Unsinkable(x))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) and Southwest(x) -> Brattish(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) and Brattish(x) -> Unkeyed(x))\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) and Inelegant(x) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) and Southwest(x) -> Unsinkable(x))\nTined(katleen) -> Inelegant(katleen)\nInelegant(inessa) and Southwest(inessa) -> Brattish(inessa)\n\nUnsinkable(inessa)\n\nUnkeyed(inessa) and Southwest(inessa) and forall x (Unkeyed(x) and Southwest(x) -> Unsinkable(x)) -> therefore Unsinkable(inessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Marline is hipless. Marline is pimply. Hester is hipless. Hester is flagitious. Brandie is pimply. Sula is hipless. Sula is welcome. White, pimply things are welcome. If something is welcome and hipless then it is untellable. If something is untellable then it is miotic. All miotic, untellable things are flagitious. White, pimply things are miotic. If something is flagitious and hipless then it is welcome. If Brandie is miotic then Brandie is pimply. If Hester is pimply and Hester is hipless then Hester is untellable. Sula is not untellable.", "logic": "\nHipless(marline)\nPimply(marline)\nHipless(hester)\nFlagitious(hester)\nPimply(brandie)\nHipless(sula)\nWelcome(sula)\nforall x (Flagitious(x) and Pimply(x) -> Welcome(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x) and Hipless(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> Miotic(x))\nforall x (Miotic(x) and Untellable(x) -> Flagitious(x))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) and Pimply(x) -> Miotic(x))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) and Hipless(x) -> Welcome(x))\nMiotic(brandie) -> Pimply(brandie)\nPimply(hester) and Hipless(hester) -> Untellable(hester)\n\nnot Untellable(sula)\n\nWelcome(sula) and Hipless(sula) and forall x (Welcome(x) and Hipless(x) -> Untellable(x)) -> therefore Untellable(sula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Revkah is gabonese. Revkah is glassed. Daphne is gabonese. Daphne is continuing. Dee is glassed. Truda is gabonese. Truda is oversize. White, glassed things are oversize. If something is oversize and gabonese then it is unproved. If something is unproved then it is pastoral. All pastoral, unproved things are continuing. White, glassed things are pastoral. If something is continuing and gabonese then it is oversize. If Dee is pastoral then Dee is glassed. If Daphne is glassed and Daphne is gabonese then Daphne is unproved. Daphne is unproved.", "logic": "\nGabonese(revkah)\nGlassed(revkah)\nGabonese(daphne)\nContinuing(daphne)\nGlassed(dee)\nGabonese(truda)\nOversize(truda)\nforall x (Continuing(x) and Glassed(x) -> Oversize(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) and Gabonese(x) -> Unproved(x))\nforall x (Unproved(x) -> Pastoral(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) and Unproved(x) -> Continuing(x))\nforall x (Continuing(x) and Glassed(x) -> Pastoral(x))\nforall x (Continuing(x) and Gabonese(x) -> Oversize(x))\nPastoral(dee) -> Glassed(dee)\nGlassed(daphne) and Gabonese(daphne) -> Unproved(daphne)\n\nUnproved(daphne)\n\nContinuing(daphne) and Gabonese(daphne) and forall x (Continuing(x) and Gabonese(x) -> Oversize(x)) -> therefore Oversize(daphne) Oversize(daphne) and Gabonese(daphne) and forall x (Oversize(x) and Gabonese(x) -> Unproved(x)) -> therefore Unproved(daphne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Rodolfo is cypriote. Rodolfo is attachable. Marci is cypriote. Marci is costate. Harrison is attachable. Vachel is cypriote. Vachel is signal. White, attachable things are signal. If something is signal and cypriote then it is opaline. If something is opaline then it is mercantile. All mercantile, opaline things are costate. White, attachable things are mercantile. If something is costate and cypriote then it is signal. If Harrison is mercantile then Harrison is attachable. If Marci is attachable and Marci is cypriote then Marci is opaline. Marci is not opaline.", "logic": "\nCypriote(rodolfo)\nAttachable(rodolfo)\nCypriote(marci)\nCostate(marci)\nAttachable(harrison)\nCypriote(vachel)\nSignal(vachel)\nforall x (Costate(x) and Attachable(x) -> Signal(x))\nforall x (Signal(x) and Cypriote(x) -> Opaline(x))\nforall x (Opaline(x) -> Mercantile(x))\nforall x (Mercantile(x) and Opaline(x) -> Costate(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) and Attachable(x) -> Mercantile(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) and Cypriote(x) -> Signal(x))\nMercantile(harrison) -> Attachable(harrison)\nAttachable(marci) and Cypriote(marci) -> Opaline(marci)\n\nnot Opaline(marci)\n\nCostate(marci) and Cypriote(marci) and forall x (Costate(x) and Cypriote(x) -> Signal(x)) -> therefore Signal(marci) Signal(marci) and Cypriote(marci) and forall x (Signal(x) and Cypriote(x) -> Opaline(x)) -> therefore Opaline(marci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Donald is oxonian. Donald is surprising. Curt is oxonian. Curt is moneran. Cesya is surprising. Aimee is oxonian. Aimee is kafkaesque. White, surprising things are kafkaesque. If something is kafkaesque and oxonian then it is columnar. If something is columnar then it is interior. All interior, columnar things are moneran. White, surprising things are interior. If something is moneran and oxonian then it is kafkaesque. If Cesya is interior then Cesya is surprising. If Curt is surprising and Curt is oxonian then Curt is columnar. Donald is not interior.", "logic": "\nOxonian(donald)\nSurprising(donald)\nOxonian(curt)\nMoneran(curt)\nSurprising(cesya)\nOxonian(aimee)\nKafkaesque(aimee)\nforall x (Moneran(x) and Surprising(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) and Oxonian(x) -> Columnar(x))\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Interior(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and Columnar(x) -> Moneran(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) and Surprising(x) -> Interior(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) and Oxonian(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nInterior(cesya) -> Surprising(cesya)\nSurprising(curt) and Oxonian(curt) -> Columnar(curt)\n\nnot Interior(donald)\n\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Interior(x)) <- forall x (Kafkaesque(x) and Oxonian(x) -> Columnar(x)) <- forall x (Moneran(x) and Surprising(x) -> Kafkaesque(x)) <- forall x (Interior(x) and Columnar(x) -> Moneran(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Maddy is opencut. Maddy is pimply. Aprilette is opencut. Aprilette is disabused. Binky is pimply. Marlyn is opencut. Marlyn is colorful. White, pimply things are colorful. If something is colorful and opencut then it is live. If something is live then it is toiling. All toiling, live things are disabused. White, pimply things are toiling. If something is disabused and opencut then it is colorful. If Binky is toiling then Binky is pimply. If Aprilette is pimply and Aprilette is opencut then Aprilette is live. Binky is colorful.", "logic": "\nOpencut(maddy)\nPimply(maddy)\nOpencut(aprilette)\nDisabused(aprilette)\nPimply(binky)\nOpencut(marlyn)\nColorful(marlyn)\nforall x (Disabused(x) and Pimply(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Colorful(x) and Opencut(x) -> Live(x))\nforall x (Live(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Live(x) -> Disabused(x))\nforall x (Disabused(x) and Pimply(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Disabused(x) and Opencut(x) -> Colorful(x))\nToiling(binky) -> Pimply(binky)\nPimply(aprilette) and Opencut(aprilette) -> Live(aprilette)\n\nColorful(binky)\n\nforall x (Disabused(x) and Pimply(x) -> Colorful(x)) <- forall x (Toiling(x) and Live(x) -> Disabused(x)) <- forall x (Colorful(x) and Opencut(x) -> Live(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Elwira is disused. Elwira is drifting. Tallie is disused. Tallie is consensual. Levon is drifting. Spiro is disused. Spiro is unsocial. White, drifting things are unsocial. If something is unsocial and disused then it is gawky. If something is gawky then it is furnished. All furnished, gawky things are consensual. White, drifting things are furnished. If something is consensual and disused then it is unsocial. If Levon is furnished then Levon is drifting. If Tallie is drifting and Tallie is disused then Tallie is gawky. Levon is not furnished.", "logic": "\nDisused(elwira)\nDrifting(elwira)\nDisused(tallie)\nConsensual(tallie)\nDrifting(levon)\nDisused(spiro)\nUnsocial(spiro)\nforall x (Consensual(x) and Drifting(x) -> Unsocial(x))\nforall x (Unsocial(x) and Disused(x) -> Gawky(x))\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Furnished(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) and Gawky(x) -> Consensual(x))\nforall x (Consensual(x) and Drifting(x) -> Furnished(x))\nforall x (Consensual(x) and Disused(x) -> Unsocial(x))\nFurnished(levon) -> Drifting(levon)\nDrifting(tallie) and Disused(tallie) -> Gawky(tallie)\n\nnot Furnished(levon)\n\nforall x (Consensual(x) and Drifting(x) -> Furnished(x)) <- forall x (Furnished(x) and Gawky(x) -> Consensual(x)) <- forall x (Unsocial(x) and Disused(x) -> Gawky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Ellyn is slummy. Ellyn is metacarpal. Millie is slummy. Millie is lavender. Kevyn is metacarpal. Lee is slummy. Lee is freakish. White, metacarpal things are freakish. If something is freakish and slummy then it is nonuniform. If something is nonuniform then it is starry. All starry, nonuniform things are lavender. White, metacarpal things are starry. If something is lavender and slummy then it is freakish. If Kevyn is starry then Kevyn is metacarpal. If Millie is metacarpal and Millie is slummy then Millie is nonuniform. Ellyn is rough.", "logic": "\nSlummy(ellyn)\nMetacarpal(ellyn)\nSlummy(millie)\nLavender(millie)\nMetacarpal(kevyn)\nSlummy(lee)\nFreakish(lee)\nforall x (Lavender(x) and Metacarpal(x) -> Freakish(x))\nforall x (Freakish(x) and Slummy(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) and Nonuniform(x) -> Lavender(x))\nforall x (Lavender(x) and Metacarpal(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Lavender(x) and Slummy(x) -> Freakish(x))\nStarry(kevyn) -> Metacarpal(kevyn)\nMetacarpal(millie) and Slummy(millie) -> Nonuniform(millie)\n\nRough(ellyn)\n\nRough(ellyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Felice is tibial. Felice is jubilant. Janith is tibial. Janith is stretchy. Tricia is jubilant. Ebenezer is tibial. Ebenezer is pitiable. White, jubilant things are pitiable. If something is pitiable and tibial then it is plastic. If something is plastic then it is peaked. All peaked, plastic things are stretchy. White, jubilant things are peaked. If something is stretchy and tibial then it is pitiable. If Tricia is peaked then Tricia is jubilant. If Janith is jubilant and Janith is tibial then Janith is plastic. Janith is not rough.", "logic": "\nTibial(felice)\nJubilant(felice)\nTibial(janith)\nStretchy(janith)\nJubilant(tricia)\nTibial(ebenezer)\nPitiable(ebenezer)\nforall x (Stretchy(x) and Jubilant(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nforall x (Pitiable(x) and Tibial(x) -> Plastic(x))\nforall x (Plastic(x) -> Peaked(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) and Plastic(x) -> Stretchy(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) and Jubilant(x) -> Peaked(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) and Tibial(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nPeaked(tricia) -> Jubilant(tricia)\nJubilant(janith) and Tibial(janith) -> Plastic(janith)\n\nnot Rough(janith)\n\nnot Rough(janith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Chrysa is bunchy. Chrysa is thirteen. Garret is bunchy. Garret is magnetized. Catlaina is thirteen. Rozelle is bunchy. Rozelle is elating. White, thirteen things are elating. If something is elating and bunchy then it is drugless. If something is drugless then it is sanguinary. All sanguinary, drugless things are magnetized. White, thirteen things are sanguinary. If something is magnetized and bunchy then it is elating. If Catlaina is sanguinary then Catlaina is thirteen. If Garret is thirteen and Garret is bunchy then Garret is drugless. Catlaina is bunchy.", "logic": "\nBunchy(chrysa)\nThirteen(chrysa)\nBunchy(garret)\nMagnetized(garret)\nThirteen(catlaina)\nBunchy(rozelle)\nElating(rozelle)\nforall x (Magnetized(x) and Thirteen(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Elating(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) and Drugless(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) and Thirteen(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Elating(x))\nSanguinary(catlaina) -> Thirteen(catlaina)\nThirteen(garret) and Bunchy(garret) -> Drugless(garret)\n\nBunchy(catlaina)\n\nBunchy(catlaina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "The aguinaldo does not see the jay. The marigold does not chase the aguinaldo. The marigold beat the jay. The marigold does not eat the aguinaldo. The marigold is articulate. The marigold does not see the aguinaldo. The marigold bleep the jay. The jay beat the marigold. The jay is primal. The jay bleep the marigold. If something bleep the jay then the jay beat the aguinaldo. If something beat the aguinaldo then it does not chase the jay. The jay is primal.", "logic": "\nnot Bleep(aguinaldo, jay)\nnot Beat(marigold, aguinaldo)\nBeat(marigold, jay)\nnot Caddy(marigold, aguinaldo)\nArticulate(marigold)\nnot Bleep(marigold, aguinaldo)\nBleep(marigold, jay)\nBeat(jay, marigold)\nPrimal(jay)\nBleep(jay, marigold)\nforall x (Bleep(x, jay) -> Beat(jay, aguinaldo))\nforall x (Beat(x, aguinaldo) -> not Beat(x, jay))\n\nPrimal(jay)\n\ntherefore Primal(jay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The lilith does not see the nealson. The ned does not chase the lilith. The ned powerwash the nealson. The ned does not eat the lilith. The ned is audacious. The ned does not see the lilith. The ned reschedule the nealson. The nealson powerwash the ned. The nealson is vicenary. The nealson reschedule the ned. If something reschedule the nealson then the nealson powerwash the lilith. If something powerwash the lilith then it does not chase the nealson. The ned powerwash the lilith.", "logic": "\nnot Reschedule(lilith, nealson)\nnot Powerwash(ned, lilith)\nPowerwash(ned, nealson)\nnot Smatter(ned, lilith)\nAudacious(ned)\nnot Reschedule(ned, lilith)\nReschedule(ned, nealson)\nPowerwash(nealson, ned)\nVicenary(nealson)\nReschedule(nealson, ned)\nforall x (Reschedule(x, nealson) -> Powerwash(nealson, lilith))\nforall x (Powerwash(x, lilith) -> not Powerwash(x, nealson))\n\nPowerwash(ned, lilith)\n\ntherefore not Powerwash(ned, lilith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The mohamad does not see the lita. The binny does not chase the mohamad. The binny fashion the lita. The binny does not eat the mohamad. The binny is basipetal. The binny does not see the mohamad. The binny pelt the lita. The lita fashion the binny. The lita is interfaith. The lita pelt the binny. If something pelt the lita then the lita fashion the mohamad. If something fashion the mohamad then it does not chase the lita. The lita fashion the mohamad.", "logic": "\nnot Pelt(mohamad, lita)\nnot Fashion(binny, mohamad)\nFashion(binny, lita)\nnot Vowelize(binny, mohamad)\nBasipetal(binny)\nnot Pelt(binny, mohamad)\nPelt(binny, lita)\nFashion(lita, binny)\nInterfaith(lita)\nPelt(lita, binny)\nforall x (Pelt(x, lita) -> Fashion(lita, mohamad))\nforall x (Fashion(x, mohamad) -> not Fashion(x, lita))\n\nFashion(lita, mohamad)\n\nPelt(binny, lita) and forall x (Pelt(x, lita) -> Fashion(lita, mohamad)) -> therefore Fashion(lita, mohamad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The barrett does not see the agneta. The millie does not chase the barrett. The millie colligate the agneta. The millie does not eat the barrett. The millie is monaural. The millie does not see the barrett. The millie powder the agneta. The agneta colligate the millie. The agneta is unrested. The agneta powder the millie. If something powder the agneta then the agneta colligate the barrett. If something colligate the barrett then it does not chase the agneta. The agneta does not chase the barrett.", "logic": "\nnot Powder(barrett, agneta)\nnot Colligate(millie, barrett)\nColligate(millie, agneta)\nnot Condition(millie, barrett)\nMonaural(millie)\nnot Powder(millie, barrett)\nPowder(millie, agneta)\nColligate(agneta, millie)\nUnrested(agneta)\nPowder(agneta, millie)\nforall x (Powder(x, agneta) -> Colligate(agneta, barrett))\nforall x (Colligate(x, barrett) -> not Colligate(x, agneta))\n\nnot Colligate(agneta, barrett)\n\nPowder(millie, agneta) and forall x (Powder(x, agneta) -> Colligate(agneta, barrett)) -> therefore Colligate(agneta, barrett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The margaux does not see the curtis. The humbert does not chase the margaux. The humbert redo the curtis. The humbert does not eat the margaux. The humbert is perforated. The humbert does not see the margaux. The humbert char the curtis. The curtis redo the humbert. The curtis is former. The curtis char the humbert. If something char the curtis then the curtis redo the margaux. If something redo the margaux then it does not chase the curtis. The curtis does not chase the curtis.", "logic": "\nnot Char(margaux, curtis)\nnot Redo(humbert, margaux)\nRedo(humbert, curtis)\nnot Epitomise(humbert, margaux)\nPerforated(humbert)\nnot Char(humbert, margaux)\nChar(humbert, curtis)\nRedo(curtis, humbert)\nFormer(curtis)\nChar(curtis, humbert)\nforall x (Char(x, curtis) -> Redo(curtis, margaux))\nforall x (Redo(x, margaux) -> not Redo(x, curtis))\n\nnot Redo(curtis, curtis)\n\nChar(humbert, curtis) and forall x (Char(x, curtis) -> Redo(curtis, margaux)) -> therefore Redo(curtis, margaux) Redo(curtis, margaux) and forall x (Redo(x, margaux) -> not Redo(x, curtis)) -> therefore not Redo(curtis, curtis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The lauretta does not see the hettie. The maggee does not chase the lauretta. The maggee crest the hettie. The maggee does not eat the lauretta. The maggee is paroxysmal. The maggee does not see the lauretta. The maggee rustle the hettie. The hettie crest the maggee. The hettie is bountied. The hettie rustle the maggee. If something rustle the hettie then the hettie crest the lauretta. If something crest the lauretta then it does not chase the hettie. The hettie crest the hettie.", "logic": "\nnot Rustle(lauretta, hettie)\nnot Crest(maggee, lauretta)\nCrest(maggee, hettie)\nnot Solarise(maggee, lauretta)\nParoxysmal(maggee)\nnot Rustle(maggee, lauretta)\nRustle(maggee, hettie)\nCrest(hettie, maggee)\nBountied(hettie)\nRustle(hettie, maggee)\nforall x (Rustle(x, hettie) -> Crest(hettie, lauretta))\nforall x (Crest(x, lauretta) -> not Crest(x, hettie))\n\nCrest(hettie, hettie)\n\nRustle(maggee, hettie) and forall x (Rustle(x, hettie) -> Crest(hettie, lauretta)) -> therefore Crest(hettie, lauretta) Crest(hettie, lauretta) and forall x (Crest(x, lauretta) -> not Crest(x, hettie)) -> therefore not Crest(hettie, hettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The tilly does not see the matilde. The petey does not chase the tilly. The petey bull the matilde. The petey does not eat the tilly. The petey is chancrous. The petey does not see the tilly. The petey escape the matilde. The matilde bull the petey. The matilde is infrequent. The matilde escape the petey. If something escape the matilde then the matilde bull the tilly. If something bull the tilly then it does not chase the matilde. The petey does not eat the petey.", "logic": "\nnot Escape(tilly, matilde)\nnot Bull(petey, tilly)\nBull(petey, matilde)\nnot Bother(petey, tilly)\nChancrous(petey)\nnot Escape(petey, tilly)\nEscape(petey, matilde)\nBull(matilde, petey)\nInfrequent(matilde)\nEscape(matilde, petey)\nforall x (Escape(x, matilde) -> Bull(matilde, tilly))\nforall x (Bull(x, tilly) -> not Bull(x, matilde))\n\nnot Bother(petey, petey)\n\nnot Bother(petey, petey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The gillian does not see the raquela. The jude does not chase the gillian. The jude lick the raquela. The jude does not eat the gillian. The jude is thrillful. The jude does not see the gillian. The jude barrack the raquela. The raquela lick the jude. The raquela is polyatomic. The raquela barrack the jude. If something barrack the raquela then the raquela lick the gillian. If something lick the gillian then it does not chase the raquela. The gillian barrack the jude.", "logic": "\nnot Barrack(gillian, raquela)\nnot Lick(jude, gillian)\nLick(jude, raquela)\nnot Devote(jude, gillian)\nThrillful(jude)\nnot Barrack(jude, gillian)\nBarrack(jude, raquela)\nLick(raquela, jude)\nPolyatomic(raquela)\nBarrack(raquela, jude)\nforall x (Barrack(x, raquela) -> Lick(raquela, gillian))\nforall x (Lick(x, gillian) -> not Lick(x, raquela))\n\nBarrack(gillian, jude)\n\nBarrack(gillian, jude) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The carmelina does not see the chloette. The troy does not chase the carmelina. The troy adjure the chloette. The troy does not eat the carmelina. The troy is atoxic. The troy does not see the carmelina. The troy ostracize the chloette. The chloette adjure the troy. The chloette is skint. The chloette ostracize the troy. If something ostracize the chloette then the chloette adjure the carmelina. If something adjure the carmelina then it does not chase the chloette. The troy is not red.", "logic": "\nnot Ostracize(carmelina, chloette)\nnot Adjure(troy, carmelina)\nAdjure(troy, chloette)\nnot Incurvate(troy, carmelina)\nAtoxic(troy)\nnot Ostracize(troy, carmelina)\nOstracize(troy, chloette)\nAdjure(chloette, troy)\nSkint(chloette)\nOstracize(chloette, troy)\nforall x (Ostracize(x, chloette) -> Adjure(chloette, carmelina))\nforall x (Adjure(x, carmelina) -> not Adjure(x, chloette))\n\nnot Red(troy)\n\nnot Red(troy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The pat does not see the willis. The verile does not chase the pat. The verile divest the willis. The verile does not eat the pat. The verile is achievable. The verile does not see the pat. The verile libel the willis. The willis divest the verile. The willis is pyknic. The willis libel the verile. If something libel the willis then the willis divest the pat. If something divest the pat then it does not chase the willis. The pat divest the pat.", "logic": "\nnot Libel(pat, willis)\nnot Divest(verile, pat)\nDivest(verile, willis)\nnot Travesty(verile, pat)\nAchievable(verile)\nnot Libel(verile, pat)\nLibel(verile, willis)\nDivest(willis, verile)\nPyknic(willis)\nLibel(willis, verile)\nforall x (Libel(x, willis) -> Divest(willis, pat))\nforall x (Divest(x, pat) -> not Divest(x, willis))\n\nDivest(pat, pat)\n\nDivest(pat, pat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The gweneth does not see the candice. The dulce does not chase the gweneth. The dulce fold the candice. The dulce does not eat the gweneth. The dulce is great. The dulce does not see the gweneth. The dulce detour the candice. The candice fold the dulce. The candice is quadruple. The candice detour the dulce. If something detour the candice then the candice fold the gweneth. If something fold the gweneth then it does not chase the candice. The candice is not great.", "logic": "\nnot Detour(gweneth, candice)\nnot Fold(dulce, gweneth)\nFold(dulce, candice)\nnot Design(dulce, gweneth)\nGreat(dulce)\nnot Detour(dulce, gweneth)\nDetour(dulce, candice)\nFold(candice, dulce)\nQuadruple(candice)\nDetour(candice, dulce)\nforall x (Detour(x, candice) -> Fold(candice, gweneth))\nforall x (Fold(x, gweneth) -> not Fold(x, candice))\n\nnot Great(candice)\n\nnot Great(candice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The antonetta does not see the lyndon. The benjie does not chase the antonetta. The benjie charleston the lyndon. The benjie does not eat the antonetta. The benjie is somalian. The benjie does not see the antonetta. The benjie interlink the lyndon. The lyndon charleston the benjie. The lyndon is pronged. The lyndon interlink the benjie. If something interlink the lyndon then the lyndon charleston the antonetta. If something charleston the antonetta then it does not chase the lyndon. The benjie interlink the benjie.", "logic": "\nnot Interlink(antonetta, lyndon)\nnot Charleston(benjie, antonetta)\nCharleston(benjie, lyndon)\nnot Envision(benjie, antonetta)\nSomalian(benjie)\nnot Interlink(benjie, antonetta)\nInterlink(benjie, lyndon)\nCharleston(lyndon, benjie)\nPronged(lyndon)\nInterlink(lyndon, benjie)\nforall x (Interlink(x, lyndon) -> Charleston(lyndon, antonetta))\nforall x (Charleston(x, antonetta) -> not Charleston(x, lyndon))\n\nInterlink(benjie, benjie)\n\nInterlink(benjie, benjie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1694"} {"premises": "The therine is grainy. The therine is megalithic. The britta is grainy. The britta is huffy. The britta buccaneer the hogan. The janessa is offsides. The janessa sand the therine. The janessa buccaneer the therine. The hogan sand the janessa. The hogan buccaneer the britta. If someone buccaneer the hogan then the hogan is offsides. If the britta stigmatise the hogan and the britta stigmatise the therine then the britta is megalithic. If someone buccaneer the britta then the britta stigmatise the therine. If someone stigmatise the therine then they are untraveled. If someone is grainy then they visit the britta. If someone stigmatise the therine and the therine sand the janessa then the janessa is huffy. If someone is megalithic then they visit the janessa. If the hogan is grainy and the hogan stigmatise the therine then the therine sand the britta. The britta is huffy.", "logic": "\nGrainy(therine)\nMegalithic(therine)\nGrainy(britta)\nHuffy(britta)\nBuccaneer(britta, hogan)\nOffsides(janessa)\nSand(janessa, therine)\nBuccaneer(janessa, therine)\nSand(hogan, janessa)\nBuccaneer(hogan, britta)\nforall x (Buccaneer(x, hogan) -> Offsides(hogan))\nStigmatise(britta, hogan) and Stigmatise(britta, therine) -> Megalithic(britta)\nforall x (Buccaneer(x, britta) -> Stigmatise(britta, therine))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, therine) -> Untraveled(x))\nforall x (Grainy(x) -> Buccaneer(x, britta))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, therine) and Sand(therine, janessa) -> Huffy(janessa))\nforall x (Megalithic(x) -> Buccaneer(x, janessa))\nGrainy(hogan) and Stigmatise(hogan, therine) -> Sand(therine, britta)\n\nHuffy(britta)\n\ntherefore Huffy(britta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The sidonia is glum. The sidonia is abuzz. The anallese is glum. The anallese is botched. The anallese squinch the ephram. The birdie is productive. The birdie sharpshoot the sidonia. The birdie squinch the sidonia. The ephram sharpshoot the birdie. The ephram squinch the anallese. If someone squinch the ephram then the ephram is productive. If the anallese retort the ephram and the anallese retort the sidonia then the anallese is abuzz. If someone squinch the anallese then the anallese retort the sidonia. If someone retort the sidonia then they are parted. If someone is glum then they visit the anallese. If someone retort the sidonia and the sidonia sharpshoot the birdie then the birdie is botched. If someone is abuzz then they visit the birdie. If the ephram is glum and the ephram retort the sidonia then the sidonia sharpshoot the anallese. The sidonia is not glum.", "logic": "\nGlum(sidonia)\nAbuzz(sidonia)\nGlum(anallese)\nBotched(anallese)\nSquinch(anallese, ephram)\nProductive(birdie)\nSharpshoot(birdie, sidonia)\nSquinch(birdie, sidonia)\nSharpshoot(ephram, birdie)\nSquinch(ephram, anallese)\nforall x (Squinch(x, ephram) -> Productive(ephram))\nRetort(anallese, ephram) and Retort(anallese, sidonia) -> Abuzz(anallese)\nforall x (Squinch(x, anallese) -> Retort(anallese, sidonia))\nforall x (Retort(x, sidonia) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Glum(x) -> Squinch(x, anallese))\nforall x (Retort(x, sidonia) and Sharpshoot(sidonia, birdie) -> Botched(birdie))\nforall x (Abuzz(x) -> Squinch(x, birdie))\nGlum(ephram) and Retort(ephram, sidonia) -> Sharpshoot(sidonia, anallese)\n\nnot Glum(sidonia)\n\ntherefore Glum(sidonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The herb is moderating. The herb is hitless. The kathlin is moderating. The kathlin is armored. The kathlin spice the yettie. The morton is eastern. The morton uncase the herb. The morton spice the herb. The yettie uncase the morton. The yettie spice the kathlin. If someone spice the yettie then the yettie is eastern. If the kathlin trudge the yettie and the kathlin trudge the herb then the kathlin is hitless. If someone spice the kathlin then the kathlin trudge the herb. If someone trudge the herb then they are medium. If someone is moderating then they visit the kathlin. If someone trudge the herb and the herb uncase the morton then the morton is armored. If someone is hitless then they visit the morton. If the yettie is moderating and the yettie trudge the herb then the herb uncase the kathlin. The kathlin spice the kathlin.", "logic": "\nModerating(herb)\nHitless(herb)\nModerating(kathlin)\nArmored(kathlin)\nSpice(kathlin, yettie)\nEastern(morton)\nUncase(morton, herb)\nSpice(morton, herb)\nUncase(yettie, morton)\nSpice(yettie, kathlin)\nforall x (Spice(x, yettie) -> Eastern(yettie))\nTrudge(kathlin, yettie) and Trudge(kathlin, herb) -> Hitless(kathlin)\nforall x (Spice(x, kathlin) -> Trudge(kathlin, herb))\nforall x (Trudge(x, herb) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Moderating(x) -> Spice(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Trudge(x, herb) and Uncase(herb, morton) -> Armored(morton))\nforall x (Hitless(x) -> Spice(x, morton))\nModerating(yettie) and Trudge(yettie, herb) -> Uncase(herb, kathlin)\n\nSpice(kathlin, kathlin)\n\nModerating(kathlin) and forall x (Moderating(x) -> Spice(x, kathlin)) -> therefore Spice(kathlin, kathlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The sascha is tilled. The sascha is crass. The hayes is tilled. The hayes is nettlesome. The hayes abide the reynold. The meridel is unaired. The meridel hygienize the sascha. The meridel abide the sascha. The reynold hygienize the meridel. The reynold abide the hayes. If someone abide the reynold then the reynold is unaired. If the hayes bell the reynold and the hayes bell the sascha then the hayes is crass. If someone abide the hayes then the hayes bell the sascha. If someone bell the sascha then they are ascosporic. If someone is tilled then they visit the hayes. If someone bell the sascha and the sascha hygienize the meridel then the meridel is nettlesome. If someone is crass then they visit the meridel. If the reynold is tilled and the reynold bell the sascha then the sascha hygienize the hayes. The hayes does not need the sascha.", "logic": "\nTilled(sascha)\nCrass(sascha)\nTilled(hayes)\nNettlesome(hayes)\nAbide(hayes, reynold)\nUnaired(meridel)\nHygienize(meridel, sascha)\nAbide(meridel, sascha)\nHygienize(reynold, meridel)\nAbide(reynold, hayes)\nforall x (Abide(x, reynold) -> Unaired(reynold))\nBell(hayes, reynold) and Bell(hayes, sascha) -> Crass(hayes)\nforall x (Abide(x, hayes) -> Bell(hayes, sascha))\nforall x (Bell(x, sascha) -> Ascosporic(x))\nforall x (Tilled(x) -> Abide(x, hayes))\nforall x (Bell(x, sascha) and Hygienize(sascha, meridel) -> Nettlesome(meridel))\nforall x (Crass(x) -> Abide(x, meridel))\nTilled(reynold) and Bell(reynold, sascha) -> Hygienize(sascha, hayes)\n\nnot Bell(hayes, sascha)\n\nAbide(reynold, hayes) and forall x (Abide(x, hayes) -> Bell(hayes, sascha)) -> therefore Bell(hayes, sascha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The karlyn is solemn. The karlyn is extended. The corri is solemn. The corri is astringent. The corri whimper the garfinkel. The faustina is sensory. The faustina escalade the karlyn. The faustina whimper the karlyn. The garfinkel escalade the faustina. The garfinkel whimper the corri. If someone whimper the garfinkel then the garfinkel is sensory. If the corri comprise the garfinkel and the corri comprise the karlyn then the corri is extended. If someone whimper the corri then the corri comprise the karlyn. If someone comprise the karlyn then they are stomatal. If someone is solemn then they visit the corri. If someone comprise the karlyn and the karlyn escalade the faustina then the faustina is astringent. If someone is extended then they visit the faustina. If the garfinkel is solemn and the garfinkel comprise the karlyn then the karlyn escalade the corri. The corri is stomatal.", "logic": "\nSolemn(karlyn)\nExtended(karlyn)\nSolemn(corri)\nAstringent(corri)\nWhimper(corri, garfinkel)\nSensory(faustina)\nEscalade(faustina, karlyn)\nWhimper(faustina, karlyn)\nEscalade(garfinkel, faustina)\nWhimper(garfinkel, corri)\nforall x (Whimper(x, garfinkel) -> Sensory(garfinkel))\nComprise(corri, garfinkel) and Comprise(corri, karlyn) -> Extended(corri)\nforall x (Whimper(x, corri) -> Comprise(corri, karlyn))\nforall x (Comprise(x, karlyn) -> Stomatal(x))\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Whimper(x, corri))\nforall x (Comprise(x, karlyn) and Escalade(karlyn, faustina) -> Astringent(faustina))\nforall x (Extended(x) -> Whimper(x, faustina))\nSolemn(garfinkel) and Comprise(garfinkel, karlyn) -> Escalade(karlyn, corri)\n\nStomatal(corri)\n\nWhimper(garfinkel, corri) and forall x (Whimper(x, corri) -> Comprise(corri, karlyn)) -> therefore Comprise(corri, karlyn) Comprise(corri, karlyn) and forall x (Comprise(x, karlyn) -> Stomatal(x)) -> therefore Stomatal(corri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The berni is clitoral. The berni is adust. The eleanore is clitoral. The eleanore is hominid. The eleanore syllabize the opalina. The marcelia is liii. The marcelia diddle the berni. The marcelia syllabize the berni. The opalina diddle the marcelia. The opalina syllabize the eleanore. If someone syllabize the opalina then the opalina is liii. If the eleanore weaken the opalina and the eleanore weaken the berni then the eleanore is adust. If someone syllabize the eleanore then the eleanore weaken the berni. If someone weaken the berni then they are unactable. If someone is clitoral then they visit the eleanore. If someone weaken the berni and the berni diddle the marcelia then the marcelia is hominid. If someone is adust then they visit the marcelia. If the opalina is clitoral and the opalina weaken the berni then the berni diddle the eleanore. The eleanore is not unactable.", "logic": "\nClitoral(berni)\nAdust(berni)\nClitoral(eleanore)\nHominid(eleanore)\nSyllabize(eleanore, opalina)\nLiii(marcelia)\nDiddle(marcelia, berni)\nSyllabize(marcelia, berni)\nDiddle(opalina, marcelia)\nSyllabize(opalina, eleanore)\nforall x (Syllabize(x, opalina) -> Liii(opalina))\nWeaken(eleanore, opalina) and Weaken(eleanore, berni) -> Adust(eleanore)\nforall x (Syllabize(x, eleanore) -> Weaken(eleanore, berni))\nforall x (Weaken(x, berni) -> Unactable(x))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) -> Syllabize(x, eleanore))\nforall x (Weaken(x, berni) and Diddle(berni, marcelia) -> Hominid(marcelia))\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Syllabize(x, marcelia))\nClitoral(opalina) and Weaken(opalina, berni) -> Diddle(berni, eleanore)\n\nnot Unactable(eleanore)\n\nSyllabize(opalina, eleanore) and forall x (Syllabize(x, eleanore) -> Weaken(eleanore, berni)) -> therefore Weaken(eleanore, berni) Weaken(eleanore, berni) and forall x (Weaken(x, berni) -> Unactable(x)) -> therefore Unactable(eleanore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The nikoletta is elderly. The nikoletta is randomized. The jerrylee is elderly. The jerrylee is ribald. The jerrylee enshroud the robb. The joelynn is handed. The joelynn guillotine the nikoletta. The joelynn enshroud the nikoletta. The robb guillotine the joelynn. The robb enshroud the jerrylee. If someone enshroud the robb then the robb is handed. If the jerrylee scab the robb and the jerrylee scab the nikoletta then the jerrylee is randomized. If someone enshroud the jerrylee then the jerrylee scab the nikoletta. If someone scab the nikoletta then they are forced. If someone is elderly then they visit the jerrylee. If someone scab the nikoletta and the nikoletta guillotine the joelynn then the joelynn is ribald. If someone is randomized then they visit the joelynn. If the robb is elderly and the robb scab the nikoletta then the nikoletta guillotine the jerrylee. The joelynn does not visit the joelynn.", "logic": "\nElderly(nikoletta)\nRandomized(nikoletta)\nElderly(jerrylee)\nRibald(jerrylee)\nEnshroud(jerrylee, robb)\nHanded(joelynn)\nGuillotine(joelynn, nikoletta)\nEnshroud(joelynn, nikoletta)\nGuillotine(robb, joelynn)\nEnshroud(robb, jerrylee)\nforall x (Enshroud(x, robb) -> Handed(robb))\nScab(jerrylee, robb) and Scab(jerrylee, nikoletta) -> Randomized(jerrylee)\nforall x (Enshroud(x, jerrylee) -> Scab(jerrylee, nikoletta))\nforall x (Scab(x, nikoletta) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Elderly(x) -> Enshroud(x, jerrylee))\nforall x (Scab(x, nikoletta) and Guillotine(nikoletta, joelynn) -> Ribald(joelynn))\nforall x (Randomized(x) -> Enshroud(x, joelynn))\nElderly(robb) and Scab(robb, nikoletta) -> Guillotine(nikoletta, jerrylee)\n\nnot Enshroud(joelynn, joelynn)\n\nforall x (Randomized(x) -> Enshroud(x, joelynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The marv is cheating. The marv is undraped. The rhona is cheating. The rhona is capitate. The rhona shun the melisse. The shara is unassuming. The shara outsource the marv. The shara shun the marv. The melisse outsource the shara. The melisse shun the rhona. If someone shun the melisse then the melisse is unassuming. If the rhona centralize the melisse and the rhona centralize the marv then the rhona is undraped. If someone shun the rhona then the rhona centralize the marv. If someone centralize the marv then they are darned. If someone is cheating then they visit the rhona. If someone centralize the marv and the marv outsource the shara then the shara is capitate. If someone is undraped then they visit the shara. If the melisse is cheating and the melisse centralize the marv then the marv outsource the rhona. The marv is darned.", "logic": "\nCheating(marv)\nUndraped(marv)\nCheating(rhona)\nCapitate(rhona)\nShun(rhona, melisse)\nUnassuming(shara)\nOutsource(shara, marv)\nShun(shara, marv)\nOutsource(melisse, shara)\nShun(melisse, rhona)\nforall x (Shun(x, melisse) -> Unassuming(melisse))\nCentralize(rhona, melisse) and Centralize(rhona, marv) -> Undraped(rhona)\nforall x (Shun(x, rhona) -> Centralize(rhona, marv))\nforall x (Centralize(x, marv) -> Darned(x))\nforall x (Cheating(x) -> Shun(x, rhona))\nforall x (Centralize(x, marv) and Outsource(marv, shara) -> Capitate(shara))\nforall x (Undraped(x) -> Shun(x, shara))\nCheating(melisse) and Centralize(melisse, marv) -> Outsource(marv, rhona)\n\nDarned(marv)\n\nforall x (Centralize(x, marv) -> Darned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The sela is choral. The sela is unexcited. The ania is choral. The ania is unfurrowed. The ania rouge the aryn. The dela is adamant. The dela reunite the sela. The dela rouge the sela. The aryn reunite the dela. The aryn rouge the ania. If someone rouge the aryn then the aryn is adamant. If the ania bight the aryn and the ania bight the sela then the ania is unexcited. If someone rouge the ania then the ania bight the sela. If someone bight the sela then they are glistening. If someone is choral then they visit the ania. If someone bight the sela and the sela reunite the dela then the dela is unfurrowed. If someone is unexcited then they visit the dela. If the aryn is choral and the aryn bight the sela then the sela reunite the ania. The dela is not unfurrowed.", "logic": "\nChoral(sela)\nUnexcited(sela)\nChoral(ania)\nUnfurrowed(ania)\nRouge(ania, aryn)\nAdamant(dela)\nReunite(dela, sela)\nRouge(dela, sela)\nReunite(aryn, dela)\nRouge(aryn, ania)\nforall x (Rouge(x, aryn) -> Adamant(aryn))\nBight(ania, aryn) and Bight(ania, sela) -> Unexcited(ania)\nforall x (Rouge(x, ania) -> Bight(ania, sela))\nforall x (Bight(x, sela) -> Glistening(x))\nforall x (Choral(x) -> Rouge(x, ania))\nforall x (Bight(x, sela) and Reunite(sela, dela) -> Unfurrowed(dela))\nforall x (Unexcited(x) -> Rouge(x, dela))\nChoral(aryn) and Bight(aryn, sela) -> Reunite(sela, ania)\n\nnot Unfurrowed(dela)\n\nforall x (Bight(x, sela) and Reunite(sela, dela) -> Unfurrowed(dela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The evania is chronic. The evania is consumable. The elbert is chronic. The elbert is crashing. The elbert drench the daniele. The estele is insolent. The estele bicker the evania. The estele drench the evania. The daniele bicker the estele. The daniele drench the elbert. If someone drench the daniele then the daniele is insolent. If the elbert drop the daniele and the elbert drop the evania then the elbert is consumable. If someone drench the elbert then the elbert drop the evania. If someone drop the evania then they are subscribed. If someone is chronic then they visit the elbert. If someone drop the evania and the evania bicker the estele then the estele is crashing. If someone is consumable then they visit the estele. If the daniele is chronic and the daniele drop the evania then the evania bicker the elbert. The estele drop the elbert.", "logic": "\nChronic(evania)\nConsumable(evania)\nChronic(elbert)\nCrashing(elbert)\nDrench(elbert, daniele)\nInsolent(estele)\nBicker(estele, evania)\nDrench(estele, evania)\nBicker(daniele, estele)\nDrench(daniele, elbert)\nforall x (Drench(x, daniele) -> Insolent(daniele))\nDrop(elbert, daniele) and Drop(elbert, evania) -> Consumable(elbert)\nforall x (Drench(x, elbert) -> Drop(elbert, evania))\nforall x (Drop(x, evania) -> Subscribed(x))\nforall x (Chronic(x) -> Drench(x, elbert))\nforall x (Drop(x, evania) and Bicker(evania, estele) -> Crashing(estele))\nforall x (Consumable(x) -> Drench(x, estele))\nChronic(daniele) and Drop(daniele, evania) -> Bicker(evania, elbert)\n\nDrop(estele, elbert)\n\nDrop(estele, elbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The retha is ransomed. The retha is precooked. The elizabet is ransomed. The elizabet is painless. The elizabet eclipse the boris. The elbert is gooey. The elbert blast the retha. The elbert eclipse the retha. The boris blast the elbert. The boris eclipse the elizabet. If someone eclipse the boris then the boris is gooey. If the elizabet etherize the boris and the elizabet etherize the retha then the elizabet is precooked. If someone eclipse the elizabet then the elizabet etherize the retha. If someone etherize the retha then they are giddy. If someone is ransomed then they visit the elizabet. If someone etherize the retha and the retha blast the elbert then the elbert is painless. If someone is precooked then they visit the elbert. If the boris is ransomed and the boris etherize the retha then the retha blast the elizabet. The retha does not see the retha.", "logic": "\nRansomed(retha)\nPrecooked(retha)\nRansomed(elizabet)\nPainless(elizabet)\nEclipse(elizabet, boris)\nGooey(elbert)\nBlast(elbert, retha)\nEclipse(elbert, retha)\nBlast(boris, elbert)\nEclipse(boris, elizabet)\nforall x (Eclipse(x, boris) -> Gooey(boris))\nEtherize(elizabet, boris) and Etherize(elizabet, retha) -> Precooked(elizabet)\nforall x (Eclipse(x, elizabet) -> Etherize(elizabet, retha))\nforall x (Etherize(x, retha) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) -> Eclipse(x, elizabet))\nforall x (Etherize(x, retha) and Blast(retha, elbert) -> Painless(elbert))\nforall x (Precooked(x) -> Eclipse(x, elbert))\nRansomed(boris) and Etherize(boris, retha) -> Blast(retha, elizabet)\n\nnot Blast(retha, retha)\n\nnot Blast(retha, retha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "The nev is disjunct. The nev is laniary. The neil is disjunct. The neil is addictive. The neil spondaize the domenic. The gennie is tertiary. The gennie lurk the nev. The gennie spondaize the nev. The domenic lurk the gennie. The domenic spondaize the neil. If someone spondaize the domenic then the domenic is tertiary. If the neil disembowel the domenic and the neil disembowel the nev then the neil is laniary. If someone spondaize the neil then the neil disembowel the nev. If someone disembowel the nev then they are subdued. If someone is disjunct then they visit the neil. If someone disembowel the nev and the nev lurk the gennie then the gennie is addictive. If someone is laniary then they visit the gennie. If the domenic is disjunct and the domenic disembowel the nev then the nev lurk the neil. The gennie spondaize the domenic.", "logic": "\nDisjunct(nev)\nLaniary(nev)\nDisjunct(neil)\nAddictive(neil)\nSpondaize(neil, domenic)\nTertiary(gennie)\nLurk(gennie, nev)\nSpondaize(gennie, nev)\nLurk(domenic, gennie)\nSpondaize(domenic, neil)\nforall x (Spondaize(x, domenic) -> Tertiary(domenic))\nDisembowel(neil, domenic) and Disembowel(neil, nev) -> Laniary(neil)\nforall x (Spondaize(x, neil) -> Disembowel(neil, nev))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, nev) -> Subdued(x))\nforall x (Disjunct(x) -> Spondaize(x, neil))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, nev) and Lurk(nev, gennie) -> Addictive(gennie))\nforall x (Laniary(x) -> Spondaize(x, gennie))\nDisjunct(domenic) and Disembowel(domenic, nev) -> Lurk(nev, neil)\n\nSpondaize(gennie, domenic)\n\nSpondaize(gennie, domenic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1056"} {"premises": "Pegeen is not unpopular. Kariotta is lxxxiii. Yule is not aegean. All prudent, lxxxiii things are not aegean. If something is fireproof and unpopular then it is animated. Quiet things are animated. Furry things are unpopular. If Pegeen is fireproof and Pegeen is not lxxxiii then Pegeen is aegean. All lxxxiii things are prudent. Yule is not aegean.", "logic": "\nnot Unpopular(pegeen)\nLxxxiii(kariotta)\nnot Aegean(yule)\nforall x (Prudent(x) and Lxxxiii(x) -> not Aegean(x))\nforall x (Fireproof(x) and Unpopular(x) -> Animated(x))\nforall x (Unpopular(x) -> Animated(x))\nforall x (Prudent(x) -> Unpopular(x))\nFireproof(pegeen) and not Lxxxiii(pegeen) -> Aegean(pegeen)\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) -> Prudent(x))\n\nnot Aegean(yule)\n\ntherefore not Aegean(yule)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Zita is not redundant. Faythe is exoergic. Randy is not blebby. All demolished, exoergic things are not blebby. If something is wanted and redundant then it is angelical. Quiet things are angelical. Furry things are redundant. If Zita is wanted and Zita is not exoergic then Zita is blebby. All exoergic things are demolished. Zita is redundant.", "logic": "\nnot Redundant(zita)\nExoergic(faythe)\nnot Blebby(randy)\nforall x (Demolished(x) and Exoergic(x) -> not Blebby(x))\nforall x (Wanted(x) and Redundant(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Redundant(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Demolished(x) -> Redundant(x))\nWanted(zita) and not Exoergic(zita) -> Blebby(zita)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Demolished(x))\n\nRedundant(zita)\n\ntherefore not Redundant(zita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Othilie is not yeastlike. Keefe is smoking. Rawley is not accented. All chaldean, smoking things are not accented. If something is labial and yeastlike then it is nucleate. Quiet things are nucleate. Furry things are yeastlike. If Othilie is labial and Othilie is not smoking then Othilie is accented. All smoking things are chaldean. Keefe is chaldean.", "logic": "\nnot Yeastlike(othilie)\nSmoking(keefe)\nnot Accented(rawley)\nforall x (Chaldean(x) and Smoking(x) -> not Accented(x))\nforall x (Labial(x) and Yeastlike(x) -> Nucleate(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Nucleate(x))\nforall x (Chaldean(x) -> Yeastlike(x))\nLabial(othilie) and not Smoking(othilie) -> Accented(othilie)\nforall x (Smoking(x) -> Chaldean(x))\n\nChaldean(keefe)\n\nSmoking(keefe) and forall x (Smoking(x) -> Chaldean(x)) -> therefore Chaldean(keefe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Natalina is not unadorned. Reid is saintly. Whitman is not modernized. All divine, saintly things are not modernized. If something is probing and unadorned then it is omnivorous. Quiet things are omnivorous. Furry things are unadorned. If Natalina is probing and Natalina is not saintly then Natalina is modernized. All saintly things are divine. Reid is not divine.", "logic": "\nnot Unadorned(natalina)\nSaintly(reid)\nnot Modernized(whitman)\nforall x (Divine(x) and Saintly(x) -> not Modernized(x))\nforall x (Probing(x) and Unadorned(x) -> Omnivorous(x))\nforall x (Unadorned(x) -> Omnivorous(x))\nforall x (Divine(x) -> Unadorned(x))\nProbing(natalina) and not Saintly(natalina) -> Modernized(natalina)\nforall x (Saintly(x) -> Divine(x))\n\nnot Divine(reid)\n\nSaintly(reid) and forall x (Saintly(x) -> Divine(x)) -> therefore Divine(reid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Tyrone is not sexist. Grete is harnessed. Corabelle is not unasked. All aegean, harnessed things are not unasked. If something is undated and sexist then it is condylar. Quiet things are condylar. Furry things are sexist. If Tyrone is undated and Tyrone is not harnessed then Tyrone is unasked. All harnessed things are aegean. Grete is not unasked.", "logic": "\nnot Sexist(tyrone)\nHarnessed(grete)\nnot Unasked(corabelle)\nforall x (Aegean(x) and Harnessed(x) -> not Unasked(x))\nforall x (Undated(x) and Sexist(x) -> Condylar(x))\nforall x (Sexist(x) -> Condylar(x))\nforall x (Aegean(x) -> Sexist(x))\nUndated(tyrone) and not Harnessed(tyrone) -> Unasked(tyrone)\nforall x (Harnessed(x) -> Aegean(x))\n\nnot Unasked(grete)\n\nHarnessed(grete) and forall x (Harnessed(x) -> Aegean(x)) -> therefore Aegean(grete) Aegean(grete) and Harnessed(grete) and forall x (Aegean(x) and Harnessed(x) -> not Unasked(x)) -> therefore not Unasked(grete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Marvin is not selective. Malissia is elastic. Ewan is not doughy. All diminuendo, elastic things are not doughy. If something is cloddish and selective then it is decent. Quiet things are decent. Furry things are selective. If Marvin is cloddish and Marvin is not elastic then Marvin is doughy. All elastic things are diminuendo. Malissia is doughy.", "logic": "\nnot Selective(marvin)\nElastic(malissia)\nnot Doughy(ewan)\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) and Elastic(x) -> not Doughy(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) and Selective(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Selective(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Selective(x))\nCloddish(marvin) and not Elastic(marvin) -> Doughy(marvin)\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Diminuendo(x))\n\nDoughy(malissia)\n\nElastic(malissia) and forall x (Elastic(x) -> Diminuendo(x)) -> therefore Diminuendo(malissia) Diminuendo(malissia) and Elastic(malissia) and forall x (Diminuendo(x) and Elastic(x) -> not Doughy(x)) -> therefore not Doughy(malissia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Jimbo is not restricted. Cheston is bilobated. Hedy is not fractional. All unlittered, bilobated things are not fractional. If something is fivefold and restricted then it is certain. Quiet things are certain. Furry things are restricted. If Jimbo is fivefold and Jimbo is not bilobated then Jimbo is fractional. All bilobated things are unlittered. Hedy is not certain.", "logic": "\nnot Restricted(jimbo)\nBilobated(cheston)\nnot Fractional(hedy)\nforall x (Unlittered(x) and Bilobated(x) -> not Fractional(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) and Restricted(x) -> Certain(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Certain(x))\nforall x (Unlittered(x) -> Restricted(x))\nFivefold(jimbo) and not Bilobated(jimbo) -> Fractional(jimbo)\nforall x (Bilobated(x) -> Unlittered(x))\n\nnot Certain(hedy)\n\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Certain(x)) <- forall x (Unlittered(x) -> Restricted(x)) <- forall x (Bilobated(x) -> Unlittered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Franky is not unsmiling. Burnaby is mantic. Torrin is not overall. All ribbed, mantic things are not overall. If something is arsenical and unsmiling then it is turbinate. Quiet things are turbinate. Furry things are unsmiling. If Franky is arsenical and Franky is not mantic then Franky is overall. All mantic things are ribbed. Torrin is unsmiling.", "logic": "\nnot Unsmiling(franky)\nMantic(burnaby)\nnot Overall(torrin)\nforall x (Ribbed(x) and Mantic(x) -> not Overall(x))\nforall x (Arsenical(x) and Unsmiling(x) -> Turbinate(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Turbinate(x))\nforall x (Ribbed(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\nArsenical(franky) and not Mantic(franky) -> Overall(franky)\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Ribbed(x))\n\nUnsmiling(torrin)\n\nforall x (Ribbed(x) -> Unsmiling(x)) <- forall x (Mantic(x) -> Ribbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Maribel is not sick. Ailina is gaudy. Candace is not dioecious. All fetid, gaudy things are not dioecious. If something is isochronal and sick then it is unassuming. Quiet things are unassuming. Furry things are sick. If Maribel is isochronal and Maribel is not gaudy then Maribel is dioecious. All gaudy things are fetid. Maribel is not unassuming.", "logic": "\nnot Sick(maribel)\nGaudy(ailina)\nnot Dioecious(candace)\nforall x (Fetid(x) and Gaudy(x) -> not Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Isochronal(x) and Sick(x) -> Unassuming(x))\nforall x (Sick(x) -> Unassuming(x))\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Sick(x))\nIsochronal(maribel) and not Gaudy(maribel) -> Dioecious(maribel)\nforall x (Gaudy(x) -> Fetid(x))\n\nnot Unassuming(maribel)\n\nforall x (Isochronal(x) and Sick(x) -> Unassuming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Dominica is not laureate. Rand is bleary. Clerissa is not hindu. All small, bleary things are not hindu. If something is repelling and laureate then it is ecumenic. Quiet things are ecumenic. Furry things are laureate. If Dominica is repelling and Dominica is not bleary then Dominica is hindu. All bleary things are small. Clerissa is repelling.", "logic": "\nnot Laureate(dominica)\nBleary(rand)\nnot Hindu(clerissa)\nforall x (Small(x) and Bleary(x) -> not Hindu(x))\nforall x (Repelling(x) and Laureate(x) -> Ecumenic(x))\nforall x (Laureate(x) -> Ecumenic(x))\nforall x (Small(x) -> Laureate(x))\nRepelling(dominica) and not Bleary(dominica) -> Hindu(dominica)\nforall x (Bleary(x) -> Small(x))\n\nRepelling(clerissa)\n\nRepelling(clerissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Randell is not snakelike. Weber is hardfisted. Noland is not isoclinic. All unspotted, hardfisted things are not isoclinic. If something is equipt and snakelike then it is euphonous. Quiet things are euphonous. Furry things are snakelike. If Randell is equipt and Randell is not hardfisted then Randell is isoclinic. All hardfisted things are unspotted. Noland is not cold.", "logic": "\nnot Snakelike(randell)\nHardfisted(weber)\nnot Isoclinic(noland)\nforall x (Unspotted(x) and Hardfisted(x) -> not Isoclinic(x))\nforall x (Equipt(x) and Snakelike(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Snakelike(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Unspotted(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nEquipt(randell) and not Hardfisted(randell) -> Isoclinic(randell)\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) -> Unspotted(x))\n\nnot Cold(noland)\n\nnot Cold(noland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "Gelya is not ectozoan. Sophronia is halal. Cherrita is not esteemed. All provisory, halal things are not esteemed. If something is pistillate and ectozoan then it is clanking. Quiet things are clanking. Furry things are ectozoan. If Gelya is pistillate and Gelya is not halal then Gelya is esteemed. All halal things are provisory. Sophronia is pistillate.", "logic": "\nnot Ectozoan(gelya)\nHalal(sophronia)\nnot Esteemed(cherrita)\nforall x (Provisory(x) and Halal(x) -> not Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) and Ectozoan(x) -> Clanking(x))\nforall x (Ectozoan(x) -> Clanking(x))\nforall x (Provisory(x) -> Ectozoan(x))\nPistillate(gelya) and not Halal(gelya) -> Esteemed(gelya)\nforall x (Halal(x) -> Provisory(x))\n\nPistillate(sophronia)\n\nPistillate(sophronia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1038"} {"premises": "The inger desalinise the bernette. The bernette is not cloying. The bernette is amnesiac. The bernette is uneconomic. The bernette preclude the inger. The bernette moisturize the inger. The bernette desalinise the inger. If someone moisturize the bernette and they are not cloying then they do not like the bernette. If the inger is cloying and the inger is not amnesiac then the inger moisturize the bernette. If someone is amnesiac then they need the bernette. The bernette is amnesiac.", "logic": "\nDesalinise(inger, bernette)\nnot Cloying(bernette)\nAmnesiac(bernette)\nUneconomic(bernette)\nPreclude(bernette, inger)\nMoisturize(bernette, inger)\nDesalinise(bernette, inger)\nforall x (Moisturize(x, bernette) and not Cloying(x) -> not Preclude(x, bernette))\nCloying(inger) and not Amnesiac(inger) -> Moisturize(inger, bernette)\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) -> Moisturize(x, bernette))\n\nAmnesiac(bernette)\n\ntherefore Amnesiac(bernette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The karla placate the kenneth. The kenneth is not covalent. The kenneth is surly. The kenneth is abrupt. The kenneth cure the karla. The kenneth binge the karla. The kenneth placate the karla. If someone binge the kenneth and they are not covalent then they do not like the kenneth. If the karla is covalent and the karla is not surly then the karla binge the kenneth. If someone is surly then they need the kenneth. The kenneth does not see the karla.", "logic": "\nPlacate(karla, kenneth)\nnot Covalent(kenneth)\nSurly(kenneth)\nAbrupt(kenneth)\nCure(kenneth, karla)\nBinge(kenneth, karla)\nPlacate(kenneth, karla)\nforall x (Binge(x, kenneth) and not Covalent(x) -> not Cure(x, kenneth))\nCovalent(karla) and not Surly(karla) -> Binge(karla, kenneth)\nforall x (Surly(x) -> Binge(x, kenneth))\n\nnot Placate(kenneth, karla)\n\ntherefore Placate(kenneth, karla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The vernice rebound the bertha. The bertha is not symbolical. The bertha is tasty. The bertha is peeved. The bertha foreknow the vernice. The bertha hawk the vernice. The bertha rebound the vernice. If someone hawk the bertha and they are not symbolical then they do not like the bertha. If the vernice is symbolical and the vernice is not tasty then the vernice hawk the bertha. If someone is tasty then they need the bertha. The bertha hawk the bertha.", "logic": "\nRebound(vernice, bertha)\nnot Symbolical(bertha)\nTasty(bertha)\nPeeved(bertha)\nForeknow(bertha, vernice)\nHawk(bertha, vernice)\nRebound(bertha, vernice)\nforall x (Hawk(x, bertha) and not Symbolical(x) -> not Foreknow(x, bertha))\nSymbolical(vernice) and not Tasty(vernice) -> Hawk(vernice, bertha)\nforall x (Tasty(x) -> Hawk(x, bertha))\n\nHawk(bertha, bertha)\n\nTasty(bertha) and forall x (Tasty(x) -> Hawk(x, bertha)) -> therefore Hawk(bertha, bertha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The natala scissor the alma. The alma is not utterable. The alma is unopened. The alma is reparable. The alma spoon the natala. The alma rebel the natala. The alma scissor the natala. If someone rebel the alma and they are not utterable then they do not like the alma. If the natala is utterable and the natala is not unopened then the natala rebel the alma. If someone is unopened then they need the alma. The alma does not need the alma.", "logic": "\nScissor(natala, alma)\nnot Utterable(alma)\nUnopened(alma)\nReparable(alma)\nSpoon(alma, natala)\nRebel(alma, natala)\nScissor(alma, natala)\nforall x (Rebel(x, alma) and not Utterable(x) -> not Spoon(x, alma))\nUtterable(natala) and not Unopened(natala) -> Rebel(natala, alma)\nforall x (Unopened(x) -> Rebel(x, alma))\n\nnot Rebel(alma, alma)\n\nUnopened(alma) and forall x (Unopened(x) -> Rebel(x, alma)) -> therefore Rebel(alma, alma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The dorris frighten the pepe. The pepe is not gainly. The pepe is prominent. The pepe is revolting. The pepe suture the dorris. The pepe furrow the dorris. The pepe frighten the dorris. If someone furrow the pepe and they are not gainly then they do not like the pepe. If the dorris is gainly and the dorris is not prominent then the dorris furrow the pepe. If someone is prominent then they need the pepe. The pepe does not like the pepe.", "logic": "\nFrighten(dorris, pepe)\nnot Gainly(pepe)\nProminent(pepe)\nRevolting(pepe)\nSuture(pepe, dorris)\nFurrow(pepe, dorris)\nFrighten(pepe, dorris)\nforall x (Furrow(x, pepe) and not Gainly(x) -> not Suture(x, pepe))\nGainly(dorris) and not Prominent(dorris) -> Furrow(dorris, pepe)\nforall x (Prominent(x) -> Furrow(x, pepe))\n\nnot Suture(pepe, pepe)\n\nProminent(pepe) and forall x (Prominent(x) -> Furrow(x, pepe)) -> therefore Furrow(pepe, pepe) Furrow(pepe, pepe) and not Gainly(pepe) and forall x (Furrow(x, pepe) and not Gainly(x) -> not Suture(x, pepe)) -> therefore not Suture(pepe, pepe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The emmett approbate the anton. The anton is not atrial. The anton is mormon. The anton is subocular. The anton patinise the emmett. The anton theorize the emmett. The anton approbate the emmett. If someone theorize the anton and they are not atrial then they do not like the anton. If the emmett is atrial and the emmett is not mormon then the emmett theorize the anton. If someone is mormon then they need the anton. The anton patinise the anton.", "logic": "\nApprobate(emmett, anton)\nnot Atrial(anton)\nMormon(anton)\nSubocular(anton)\nPatinise(anton, emmett)\nTheorize(anton, emmett)\nApprobate(anton, emmett)\nforall x (Theorize(x, anton) and not Atrial(x) -> not Patinise(x, anton))\nAtrial(emmett) and not Mormon(emmett) -> Theorize(emmett, anton)\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Theorize(x, anton))\n\nPatinise(anton, anton)\n\nMormon(anton) and forall x (Mormon(x) -> Theorize(x, anton)) -> therefore Theorize(anton, anton) Theorize(anton, anton) and not Atrial(anton) and forall x (Theorize(x, anton) and not Atrial(x) -> not Patinise(x, anton)) -> therefore not Patinise(anton, anton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The antonina compound the brunhilde. The brunhilde is not astronomic. The brunhilde is ratlike. The brunhilde is siliceous. The brunhilde intromit the antonina. The brunhilde reave the antonina. The brunhilde compound the antonina. If someone reave the brunhilde and they are not astronomic then they do not like the brunhilde. If the antonina is astronomic and the antonina is not ratlike then the antonina reave the brunhilde. If someone is ratlike then they need the brunhilde. The antonina does not need the brunhilde.", "logic": "\nCompound(antonina, brunhilde)\nnot Astronomic(brunhilde)\nRatlike(brunhilde)\nSiliceous(brunhilde)\nIntromit(brunhilde, antonina)\nReave(brunhilde, antonina)\nCompound(brunhilde, antonina)\nforall x (Reave(x, brunhilde) and not Astronomic(x) -> not Intromit(x, brunhilde))\nAstronomic(antonina) and not Ratlike(antonina) -> Reave(antonina, brunhilde)\nforall x (Ratlike(x) -> Reave(x, brunhilde))\n\nnot Reave(antonina, brunhilde)\n\nAstronomic(antonina) and not Ratlike(antonina) -> Reave(antonina, brunhilde) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The ramsey colorcast the myna. The myna is not midland. The myna is relaxed. The myna is ingenious. The myna steam the ramsey. The myna loan the ramsey. The myna colorcast the ramsey. If someone loan the myna and they are not midland then they do not like the myna. If the ramsey is midland and the ramsey is not relaxed then the ramsey loan the myna. If someone is relaxed then they need the myna. The ramsey is cold.", "logic": "\nColorcast(ramsey, myna)\nnot Midland(myna)\nRelaxed(myna)\nIngenious(myna)\nSteam(myna, ramsey)\nLoan(myna, ramsey)\nColorcast(myna, ramsey)\nforall x (Loan(x, myna) and not Midland(x) -> not Steam(x, myna))\nMidland(ramsey) and not Relaxed(ramsey) -> Loan(ramsey, myna)\nforall x (Relaxed(x) -> Loan(x, myna))\n\nCold(ramsey)\n\nCold(ramsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The dwane express the friedric. The friedric is not patriotic. The friedric is slovenly. The friedric is unrepaired. The friedric roneo the dwane. The friedric wiggle the dwane. The friedric express the dwane. If someone wiggle the friedric and they are not patriotic then they do not like the friedric. If the dwane is patriotic and the dwane is not slovenly then the dwane wiggle the friedric. If someone is slovenly then they need the friedric. The dwane does not need the dwane.", "logic": "\nExpress(dwane, friedric)\nnot Patriotic(friedric)\nSlovenly(friedric)\nUnrepaired(friedric)\nRoneo(friedric, dwane)\nWiggle(friedric, dwane)\nExpress(friedric, dwane)\nforall x (Wiggle(x, friedric) and not Patriotic(x) -> not Roneo(x, friedric))\nPatriotic(dwane) and not Slovenly(dwane) -> Wiggle(dwane, friedric)\nforall x (Slovenly(x) -> Wiggle(x, friedric))\n\nnot Wiggle(dwane, dwane)\n\nnot Wiggle(dwane, dwane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The hersch transgress the gabriella. The gabriella is not blastemal. The gabriella is empty. The gabriella is hypaethral. The gabriella pulverize the hersch. The gabriella reconsider the hersch. The gabriella transgress the hersch. If someone reconsider the gabriella and they are not blastemal then they do not like the gabriella. If the hersch is blastemal and the hersch is not empty then the hersch reconsider the gabriella. If someone is empty then they need the gabriella. The gabriella transgress the gabriella.", "logic": "\nTransgress(hersch, gabriella)\nnot Blastemal(gabriella)\nEmpty(gabriella)\nHypaethral(gabriella)\nPulverize(gabriella, hersch)\nReconsider(gabriella, hersch)\nTransgress(gabriella, hersch)\nforall x (Reconsider(x, gabriella) and not Blastemal(x) -> not Pulverize(x, gabriella))\nBlastemal(hersch) and not Empty(hersch) -> Reconsider(hersch, gabriella)\nforall x (Empty(x) -> Reconsider(x, gabriella))\n\nTransgress(gabriella, gabriella)\n\nTransgress(gabriella, gabriella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The carole simplify the marchall. The marchall is not avertable. The marchall is fingerlike. The marchall is auric. The marchall embargo the carole. The marchall stabilize the carole. The marchall simplify the carole. If someone stabilize the marchall and they are not avertable then they do not like the marchall. If the carole is avertable and the carole is not fingerlike then the carole stabilize the marchall. If someone is fingerlike then they need the marchall. The carole is not avertable.", "logic": "\nSimplify(carole, marchall)\nnot Avertable(marchall)\nFingerlike(marchall)\nAuric(marchall)\nEmbargo(marchall, carole)\nStabilize(marchall, carole)\nSimplify(marchall, carole)\nforall x (Stabilize(x, marchall) and not Avertable(x) -> not Embargo(x, marchall))\nAvertable(carole) and not Fingerlike(carole) -> Stabilize(carole, marchall)\nforall x (Fingerlike(x) -> Stabilize(x, marchall))\n\nnot Avertable(carole)\n\nnot Avertable(carole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "The prue attenuate the loni. The loni is not renascent. The loni is inshore. The loni is undeclared. The loni scrabble the prue. The loni expect the prue. The loni attenuate the prue. If someone expect the loni and they are not renascent then they do not like the loni. If the prue is renascent and the prue is not inshore then the prue expect the loni. If someone is inshore then they need the loni. The prue attenuate the prue.", "logic": "\nAttenuate(prue, loni)\nnot Renascent(loni)\nInshore(loni)\nUndeclared(loni)\nScrabble(loni, prue)\nExpect(loni, prue)\nAttenuate(loni, prue)\nforall x (Expect(x, loni) and not Renascent(x) -> not Scrabble(x, loni))\nRenascent(prue) and not Inshore(prue) -> Expect(prue, loni)\nforall x (Inshore(x) -> Expect(x, loni))\n\nAttenuate(prue, prue)\n\nAttenuate(prue, prue) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1073"} {"premises": "Laverna is catarrhine. Laverna is craved. Laverna is unkindly. Laverna is calamitous. Laverna is partible. Nan is catarrhine. Nan is tentacled. Nan is calamitous. Nan is chanted. Nan is partible. Chery is craved. Chery is not unkindly. Chery is tentacled. Chery is partible. Linn is catarrhine. Linn is partible. All chanted, unkindly things are tentacled. Red, craved things are tentacled. All chanted, tentacled things are catarrhine. Round, catarrhine things are unkindly. If something is calamitous and not partible then it is unkindly. If Nan is not chanted then Nan is calamitous. If something is unkindly then it is calamitous. If Linn is craved then Linn is not catarrhine. Laverna is calamitous.", "logic": "\nCatarrhine(laverna)\nCraved(laverna)\nUnkindly(laverna)\nCalamitous(laverna)\nPartible(laverna)\nCatarrhine(nan)\nTentacled(nan)\nCalamitous(nan)\nChanted(nan)\nPartible(nan)\nCraved(chery)\nnot Unkindly(chery)\nTentacled(chery)\nPartible(chery)\nCatarrhine(linn)\nPartible(linn)\nforall x (Chanted(x) and Unkindly(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Craved(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) and Tentacled(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) and Catarrhine(x) -> Unkindly(x))\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and not Partible(x) -> Unkindly(x))\nnot Chanted(nan) -> Calamitous(nan)\nforall x (Unkindly(x) -> Calamitous(x))\nCraved(linn) -> not Catarrhine(linn)\n\nCalamitous(laverna)\n\ntherefore Calamitous(laverna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Demetris is boughless. Demetris is abusive. Demetris is piquant. Demetris is germinal. Demetris is macedonian. Shela is boughless. Shela is glomerular. Shela is germinal. Shela is unexciting. Shela is macedonian. Damien is abusive. Damien is not piquant. Damien is glomerular. Damien is macedonian. Cyrill is boughless. Cyrill is macedonian. All unexciting, piquant things are glomerular. Red, abusive things are glomerular. All unexciting, glomerular things are boughless. Round, boughless things are piquant. If something is germinal and not macedonian then it is piquant. If Shela is not unexciting then Shela is germinal. If something is piquant then it is germinal. If Cyrill is abusive then Cyrill is not boughless. Cyrill is not macedonian.", "logic": "\nBoughless(demetris)\nAbusive(demetris)\nPiquant(demetris)\nGerminal(demetris)\nMacedonian(demetris)\nBoughless(shela)\nGlomerular(shela)\nGerminal(shela)\nUnexciting(shela)\nMacedonian(shela)\nAbusive(damien)\nnot Piquant(damien)\nGlomerular(damien)\nMacedonian(damien)\nBoughless(cyrill)\nMacedonian(cyrill)\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and Piquant(x) -> Glomerular(x))\nforall x (Germinal(x) and Abusive(x) -> Glomerular(x))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and Glomerular(x) -> Boughless(x))\nforall x (Macedonian(x) and Boughless(x) -> Piquant(x))\nforall x (Germinal(x) and not Macedonian(x) -> Piquant(x))\nnot Unexciting(shela) -> Germinal(shela)\nforall x (Piquant(x) -> Germinal(x))\nAbusive(cyrill) -> not Boughless(cyrill)\n\nnot Macedonian(cyrill)\n\ntherefore Macedonian(cyrill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Ashly is unbodied. Ashly is hmong. Ashly is roughhewn. Ashly is festal. Ashly is unfriendly. Zora is unbodied. Zora is antitoxic. Zora is festal. Zora is befouled. Zora is unfriendly. Kiley is hmong. Kiley is not roughhewn. Kiley is antitoxic. Kiley is unfriendly. Hedy is unbodied. Hedy is unfriendly. All befouled, roughhewn things are antitoxic. Red, hmong things are antitoxic. All befouled, antitoxic things are unbodied. Round, unbodied things are roughhewn. If something is festal and not unfriendly then it is roughhewn. If Zora is not befouled then Zora is festal. If something is roughhewn then it is festal. If Hedy is hmong then Hedy is not unbodied. Hedy is roughhewn.", "logic": "\nUnbodied(ashly)\nHmong(ashly)\nRoughhewn(ashly)\nFestal(ashly)\nUnfriendly(ashly)\nUnbodied(zora)\nAntitoxic(zora)\nFestal(zora)\nBefouled(zora)\nUnfriendly(zora)\nHmong(kiley)\nnot Roughhewn(kiley)\nAntitoxic(kiley)\nUnfriendly(kiley)\nUnbodied(hedy)\nUnfriendly(hedy)\nforall x (Befouled(x) and Roughhewn(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and Hmong(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\nforall x (Befouled(x) and Antitoxic(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Unfriendly(x) and Unbodied(x) -> Roughhewn(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and not Unfriendly(x) -> Roughhewn(x))\nnot Befouled(zora) -> Festal(zora)\nforall x (Roughhewn(x) -> Festal(x))\nHmong(hedy) -> not Unbodied(hedy)\n\nRoughhewn(hedy)\n\nUnfriendly(hedy) and Unbodied(hedy) and forall x (Unfriendly(x) and Unbodied(x) -> Roughhewn(x)) -> therefore Roughhewn(hedy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Addis is unmovable. Addis is sculpted. Addis is standard. Addis is magyar. Addis is quotable. Fiann is unmovable. Fiann is disheveled. Fiann is magyar. Fiann is authentic. Fiann is quotable. Torrey is sculpted. Torrey is not standard. Torrey is disheveled. Torrey is quotable. Bernardo is unmovable. Bernardo is quotable. All authentic, standard things are disheveled. Red, sculpted things are disheveled. All authentic, disheveled things are unmovable. Round, unmovable things are standard. If something is magyar and not quotable then it is standard. If Fiann is not authentic then Fiann is magyar. If something is standard then it is magyar. If Bernardo is sculpted then Bernardo is not unmovable. Addis is not disheveled.", "logic": "\nUnmovable(addis)\nSculpted(addis)\nStandard(addis)\nMagyar(addis)\nQuotable(addis)\nUnmovable(fiann)\nDisheveled(fiann)\nMagyar(fiann)\nAuthentic(fiann)\nQuotable(fiann)\nSculpted(torrey)\nnot Standard(torrey)\nDisheveled(torrey)\nQuotable(torrey)\nUnmovable(bernardo)\nQuotable(bernardo)\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Standard(x) -> Disheveled(x))\nforall x (Magyar(x) and Sculpted(x) -> Disheveled(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Disheveled(x) -> Unmovable(x))\nforall x (Quotable(x) and Unmovable(x) -> Standard(x))\nforall x (Magyar(x) and not Quotable(x) -> Standard(x))\nnot Authentic(fiann) -> Magyar(fiann)\nforall x (Standard(x) -> Magyar(x))\nSculpted(bernardo) -> not Unmovable(bernardo)\n\nnot Disheveled(addis)\n\nMagyar(addis) and Sculpted(addis) and forall x (Magyar(x) and Sculpted(x) -> Disheveled(x)) -> therefore Disheveled(addis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Sussi is pendent. Sussi is decided. Sussi is nonsweet. Sussi is kurdish. Sussi is skinned. Gabbie is pendent. Gabbie is fumbling. Gabbie is kurdish. Gabbie is enzymatic. Gabbie is skinned. Weider is decided. Weider is not nonsweet. Weider is fumbling. Weider is skinned. Fawn is pendent. Fawn is skinned. All enzymatic, nonsweet things are fumbling. Red, decided things are fumbling. All enzymatic, fumbling things are pendent. Round, pendent things are nonsweet. If something is kurdish and not skinned then it is nonsweet. If Gabbie is not enzymatic then Gabbie is kurdish. If something is nonsweet then it is kurdish. If Fawn is decided then Fawn is not pendent. Fawn is kurdish.", "logic": "\nPendent(sussi)\nDecided(sussi)\nNonsweet(sussi)\nKurdish(sussi)\nSkinned(sussi)\nPendent(gabbie)\nFumbling(gabbie)\nKurdish(gabbie)\nEnzymatic(gabbie)\nSkinned(gabbie)\nDecided(weider)\nnot Nonsweet(weider)\nFumbling(weider)\nSkinned(weider)\nPendent(fawn)\nSkinned(fawn)\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) and Nonsweet(x) -> Fumbling(x))\nforall x (Kurdish(x) and Decided(x) -> Fumbling(x))\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) and Fumbling(x) -> Pendent(x))\nforall x (Skinned(x) and Pendent(x) -> Nonsweet(x))\nforall x (Kurdish(x) and not Skinned(x) -> Nonsweet(x))\nnot Enzymatic(gabbie) -> Kurdish(gabbie)\nforall x (Nonsweet(x) -> Kurdish(x))\nDecided(fawn) -> not Pendent(fawn)\n\nKurdish(fawn)\n\nSkinned(fawn) and Pendent(fawn) and forall x (Skinned(x) and Pendent(x) -> Nonsweet(x)) -> therefore Nonsweet(fawn) Nonsweet(fawn) and forall x (Nonsweet(x) -> Kurdish(x)) -> therefore Kurdish(fawn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Geri is quelled. Geri is wormy. Geri is fretted. Geri is lowbred. Geri is ecstatic. Dode is quelled. Dode is monochrome. Dode is lowbred. Dode is unsmiling. Dode is ecstatic. Celina is wormy. Celina is not fretted. Celina is monochrome. Celina is ecstatic. Robbyn is quelled. Robbyn is ecstatic. All unsmiling, fretted things are monochrome. Red, wormy things are monochrome. All unsmiling, monochrome things are quelled. Round, quelled things are fretted. If something is lowbred and not ecstatic then it is fretted. If Dode is not unsmiling then Dode is lowbred. If something is fretted then it is lowbred. If Robbyn is wormy then Robbyn is not quelled. Robbyn is not lowbred.", "logic": "\nQuelled(geri)\nWormy(geri)\nFretted(geri)\nLowbred(geri)\nEcstatic(geri)\nQuelled(dode)\nMonochrome(dode)\nLowbred(dode)\nUnsmiling(dode)\nEcstatic(dode)\nWormy(celina)\nnot Fretted(celina)\nMonochrome(celina)\nEcstatic(celina)\nQuelled(robbyn)\nEcstatic(robbyn)\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and Fretted(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Lowbred(x) and Wormy(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and Monochrome(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Ecstatic(x) and Quelled(x) -> Fretted(x))\nforall x (Lowbred(x) and not Ecstatic(x) -> Fretted(x))\nnot Unsmiling(dode) -> Lowbred(dode)\nforall x (Fretted(x) -> Lowbred(x))\nWormy(robbyn) -> not Quelled(robbyn)\n\nnot Lowbred(robbyn)\n\nEcstatic(robbyn) and Quelled(robbyn) and forall x (Ecstatic(x) and Quelled(x) -> Fretted(x)) -> therefore Fretted(robbyn) Fretted(robbyn) and forall x (Fretted(x) -> Lowbred(x)) -> therefore Lowbred(robbyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Avraham is soaring. Avraham is euphonous. Avraham is hebraic. Avraham is blistery. Avraham is innumerous. Glenna is soaring. Glenna is singsong. Glenna is blistery. Glenna is catapultic. Glenna is innumerous. Raoul is euphonous. Raoul is not hebraic. Raoul is singsong. Raoul is innumerous. Hakeem is soaring. Hakeem is innumerous. All catapultic, hebraic things are singsong. Red, euphonous things are singsong. All catapultic, singsong things are soaring. Round, soaring things are hebraic. If something is blistery and not innumerous then it is hebraic. If Glenna is not catapultic then Glenna is blistery. If something is hebraic then it is blistery. If Hakeem is euphonous then Hakeem is not soaring. Hakeem is not singsong.", "logic": "\nSoaring(avraham)\nEuphonous(avraham)\nHebraic(avraham)\nBlistery(avraham)\nInnumerous(avraham)\nSoaring(glenna)\nSingsong(glenna)\nBlistery(glenna)\nCatapultic(glenna)\nInnumerous(glenna)\nEuphonous(raoul)\nnot Hebraic(raoul)\nSingsong(raoul)\nInnumerous(raoul)\nSoaring(hakeem)\nInnumerous(hakeem)\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Singsong(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Euphonous(x) -> Singsong(x))\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Singsong(x) -> Soaring(x))\nforall x (Innumerous(x) and Soaring(x) -> Hebraic(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and not Innumerous(x) -> Hebraic(x))\nnot Catapultic(glenna) -> Blistery(glenna)\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Blistery(x))\nEuphonous(hakeem) -> not Soaring(hakeem)\n\nnot Singsong(hakeem)\n\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Singsong(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Vick is tyrolean. Vick is solidified. Vick is gymnastic. Vick is uric. Vick is incan. Yvette is tyrolean. Yvette is intertidal. Yvette is uric. Yvette is equipt. Yvette is incan. Adel is solidified. Adel is not gymnastic. Adel is intertidal. Adel is incan. Gaspar is tyrolean. Gaspar is incan. All equipt, gymnastic things are intertidal. Red, solidified things are intertidal. All equipt, intertidal things are tyrolean. Round, tyrolean things are gymnastic. If something is uric and not incan then it is gymnastic. If Yvette is not equipt then Yvette is uric. If something is gymnastic then it is uric. If Gaspar is solidified then Gaspar is not tyrolean. Adel is uric.", "logic": "\nTyrolean(vick)\nSolidified(vick)\nGymnastic(vick)\nUric(vick)\nIncan(vick)\nTyrolean(yvette)\nIntertidal(yvette)\nUric(yvette)\nEquipt(yvette)\nIncan(yvette)\nSolidified(adel)\nnot Gymnastic(adel)\nIntertidal(adel)\nIncan(adel)\nTyrolean(gaspar)\nIncan(gaspar)\nforall x (Equipt(x) and Gymnastic(x) -> Intertidal(x))\nforall x (Uric(x) and Solidified(x) -> Intertidal(x))\nforall x (Equipt(x) and Intertidal(x) -> Tyrolean(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) and Tyrolean(x) -> Gymnastic(x))\nforall x (Uric(x) and not Incan(x) -> Gymnastic(x))\nnot Equipt(yvette) -> Uric(yvette)\nforall x (Gymnastic(x) -> Uric(x))\nSolidified(gaspar) -> not Tyrolean(gaspar)\n\nUric(adel)\n\nforall x (Gymnastic(x) -> Uric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Lolita is admissible. Lolita is adducting. Lolita is hematal. Lolita is earlier. Lolita is prisonlike. Jule is admissible. Jule is lipophilic. Jule is earlier. Jule is unreadable. Jule is prisonlike. Welch is adducting. Welch is not hematal. Welch is lipophilic. Welch is prisonlike. Temp is admissible. Temp is prisonlike. All unreadable, hematal things are lipophilic. Red, adducting things are lipophilic. All unreadable, lipophilic things are admissible. Round, admissible things are hematal. If something is earlier and not prisonlike then it is hematal. If Jule is not unreadable then Jule is earlier. If something is hematal then it is earlier. If Temp is adducting then Temp is not admissible. Welch is not admissible.", "logic": "\nAdmissible(lolita)\nAdducting(lolita)\nHematal(lolita)\nEarlier(lolita)\nPrisonlike(lolita)\nAdmissible(jule)\nLipophilic(jule)\nEarlier(jule)\nUnreadable(jule)\nPrisonlike(jule)\nAdducting(welch)\nnot Hematal(welch)\nLipophilic(welch)\nPrisonlike(welch)\nAdmissible(temp)\nPrisonlike(temp)\nforall x (Unreadable(x) and Hematal(x) -> Lipophilic(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) and Adducting(x) -> Lipophilic(x))\nforall x (Unreadable(x) and Lipophilic(x) -> Admissible(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) and Admissible(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) and not Prisonlike(x) -> Hematal(x))\nnot Unreadable(jule) -> Earlier(jule)\nforall x (Hematal(x) -> Earlier(x))\nAdducting(temp) -> not Admissible(temp)\n\nnot Admissible(welch)\n\nforall x (Unreadable(x) and Lipophilic(x) -> Admissible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Hildagard is acellular. Hildagard is hygienical. Hildagard is panoptic. Hildagard is abortive. Hildagard is third. Rudolf is acellular. Rudolf is shortened. Rudolf is abortive. Rudolf is variable. Rudolf is third. Randy is hygienical. Randy is not panoptic. Randy is shortened. Randy is third. Nealy is acellular. Nealy is third. All variable, panoptic things are shortened. Red, hygienical things are shortened. All variable, shortened things are acellular. Round, acellular things are panoptic. If something is abortive and not third then it is panoptic. If Rudolf is not variable then Rudolf is abortive. If something is panoptic then it is abortive. If Nealy is hygienical then Nealy is not acellular. Hildagard is variable.", "logic": "\nAcellular(hildagard)\nHygienical(hildagard)\nPanoptic(hildagard)\nAbortive(hildagard)\nThird(hildagard)\nAcellular(rudolf)\nShortened(rudolf)\nAbortive(rudolf)\nVariable(rudolf)\nThird(rudolf)\nHygienical(randy)\nnot Panoptic(randy)\nShortened(randy)\nThird(randy)\nAcellular(nealy)\nThird(nealy)\nforall x (Variable(x) and Panoptic(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Abortive(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Variable(x) and Shortened(x) -> Acellular(x))\nforall x (Third(x) and Acellular(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Abortive(x) and not Third(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nnot Variable(rudolf) -> Abortive(rudolf)\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Abortive(x))\nHygienical(nealy) -> not Acellular(nealy)\n\nVariable(hildagard)\n\nVariable(hildagard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Dorisa is prosperous. Dorisa is exegetic. Dorisa is shoaly. Dorisa is proximo. Dorisa is rupicolous. Markos is prosperous. Markos is perineal. Markos is proximo. Markos is literal. Markos is rupicolous. Kala is exegetic. Kala is not shoaly. Kala is perineal. Kala is rupicolous. Ransell is prosperous. Ransell is rupicolous. All literal, shoaly things are perineal. Red, exegetic things are perineal. All literal, perineal things are prosperous. Round, prosperous things are shoaly. If something is proximo and not rupicolous then it is shoaly. If Markos is not literal then Markos is proximo. If something is shoaly then it is proximo. If Ransell is exegetic then Ransell is not prosperous. Markos is not exegetic.", "logic": "\nProsperous(dorisa)\nExegetic(dorisa)\nShoaly(dorisa)\nProximo(dorisa)\nRupicolous(dorisa)\nProsperous(markos)\nPerineal(markos)\nProximo(markos)\nLiteral(markos)\nRupicolous(markos)\nExegetic(kala)\nnot Shoaly(kala)\nPerineal(kala)\nRupicolous(kala)\nProsperous(ransell)\nRupicolous(ransell)\nforall x (Literal(x) and Shoaly(x) -> Perineal(x))\nforall x (Proximo(x) and Exegetic(x) -> Perineal(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Perineal(x) -> Prosperous(x))\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) and Prosperous(x) -> Shoaly(x))\nforall x (Proximo(x) and not Rupicolous(x) -> Shoaly(x))\nnot Literal(markos) -> Proximo(markos)\nforall x (Shoaly(x) -> Proximo(x))\nExegetic(ransell) -> not Prosperous(ransell)\n\nnot Exegetic(markos)\n\nnot Exegetic(markos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Ola is maroon. Ola is crocketed. Ola is repellant. Ola is mean. Ola is attached. Lishe is maroon. Lishe is mimetic. Lishe is mean. Lishe is interred. Lishe is attached. Temp is crocketed. Temp is not repellant. Temp is mimetic. Temp is attached. Joyan is maroon. Joyan is attached. All interred, repellant things are mimetic. Red, crocketed things are mimetic. All interred, mimetic things are maroon. Round, maroon things are repellant. If something is mean and not attached then it is repellant. If Lishe is not interred then Lishe is mean. If something is repellant then it is mean. If Joyan is crocketed then Joyan is not maroon. Joyan is crocketed.", "logic": "\nMaroon(ola)\nCrocketed(ola)\nRepellant(ola)\nMean(ola)\nAttached(ola)\nMaroon(lishe)\nMimetic(lishe)\nMean(lishe)\nInterred(lishe)\nAttached(lishe)\nCrocketed(temp)\nnot Repellant(temp)\nMimetic(temp)\nAttached(temp)\nMaroon(joyan)\nAttached(joyan)\nforall x (Interred(x) and Repellant(x) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Mean(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Interred(x) and Mimetic(x) -> Maroon(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Maroon(x) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Mean(x) and not Attached(x) -> Repellant(x))\nnot Interred(lishe) -> Mean(lishe)\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Mean(x))\nCrocketed(joyan) -> not Maroon(joyan)\n\nCrocketed(joyan)\n\nCrocketed(joyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The reiko burble the reilly. The reiko recopy the rosella. The reiko is neritic. The reilly recopy the reiko. The reilly is blanched. The laetitia burble the rosella. The laetitia recopy the reilly. The rosella burble the reilly. The rosella is neritic. The rosella consent the laetitia. If something burble the reiko and it is swelled then the reiko consent the laetitia. If something is fictional then it consent the reilly. If something recopy the laetitia then the laetitia is fictional. If something burble the reilly then the reilly recopy the laetitia. If the reilly recopy the rosella then the rosella burble the reilly. If something recopy the reiko and it recopy the reilly then the reilly consent the rosella. The laetitia recopy the reilly.", "logic": "\nBurble(reiko, reilly)\nRecopy(reiko, rosella)\nNeritic(reiko)\nRecopy(reilly, reiko)\nBlanched(reilly)\nBurble(laetitia, rosella)\nRecopy(laetitia, reilly)\nBurble(rosella, reilly)\nNeritic(rosella)\nConsent(rosella, laetitia)\nforall x (Burble(x, reiko) and Swelled(x) -> Consent(reiko, laetitia))\nforall x (Fictional(x) -> Consent(x, reilly))\nforall x (Recopy(x, laetitia) -> Fictional(laetitia))\nforall x (Burble(x, reilly) -> Recopy(reilly, laetitia))\nRecopy(reilly, rosella) -> Burble(rosella, reilly)\nforall x (Recopy(x, reiko) and Recopy(x, reilly) -> Consent(reilly, rosella))\n\nRecopy(laetitia, reilly)\n\ntherefore Recopy(laetitia, reilly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The teresita scaffold the cristie. The teresita unbar the cris. The teresita is derisory. The cristie unbar the teresita. The cristie is meiotic. The crissie scaffold the cris. The crissie unbar the cristie. The cris scaffold the cristie. The cris is derisory. The cris severalize the crissie. If something scaffold the teresita and it is carpellate then the teresita severalize the crissie. If something is partizan then it severalize the cristie. If something unbar the crissie then the crissie is partizan. If something scaffold the cristie then the cristie unbar the crissie. If the cristie unbar the cris then the cris scaffold the cristie. If something unbar the teresita and it unbar the cristie then the cristie severalize the cris. The cris does not chase the cristie.", "logic": "\nScaffold(teresita, cristie)\nUnbar(teresita, cris)\nDerisory(teresita)\nUnbar(cristie, teresita)\nMeiotic(cristie)\nScaffold(crissie, cris)\nUnbar(crissie, cristie)\nScaffold(cris, cristie)\nDerisory(cris)\nSeveralize(cris, crissie)\nforall x (Scaffold(x, teresita) and Carpellate(x) -> Severalize(teresita, crissie))\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> Severalize(x, cristie))\nforall x (Unbar(x, crissie) -> Partizan(crissie))\nforall x (Scaffold(x, cristie) -> Unbar(cristie, crissie))\nUnbar(cristie, cris) -> Scaffold(cris, cristie)\nforall x (Unbar(x, teresita) and Unbar(x, cristie) -> Severalize(cristie, cris))\n\nnot Scaffold(cris, cristie)\n\ntherefore Scaffold(cris, cristie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The rhoda ratify the westbrook. The rhoda canter the allin. The rhoda is majuscule. The westbrook canter the rhoda. The westbrook is obliging. The gussy ratify the allin. The gussy canter the westbrook. The allin ratify the westbrook. The allin is majuscule. The allin sample the gussy. If something ratify the rhoda and it is untutored then the rhoda sample the gussy. If something is reliable then it sample the westbrook. If something canter the gussy then the gussy is reliable. If something ratify the westbrook then the westbrook canter the gussy. If the westbrook canter the allin then the allin ratify the westbrook. If something canter the rhoda and it canter the westbrook then the westbrook sample the allin. The westbrook canter the gussy.", "logic": "\nRatify(rhoda, westbrook)\nCanter(rhoda, allin)\nMajuscule(rhoda)\nCanter(westbrook, rhoda)\nObliging(westbrook)\nRatify(gussy, allin)\nCanter(gussy, westbrook)\nRatify(allin, westbrook)\nMajuscule(allin)\nSample(allin, gussy)\nforall x (Ratify(x, rhoda) and Untutored(x) -> Sample(rhoda, gussy))\nforall x (Reliable(x) -> Sample(x, westbrook))\nforall x (Canter(x, gussy) -> Reliable(gussy))\nforall x (Ratify(x, westbrook) -> Canter(westbrook, gussy))\nCanter(westbrook, allin) -> Ratify(allin, westbrook)\nforall x (Canter(x, rhoda) and Canter(x, westbrook) -> Sample(westbrook, allin))\n\nCanter(westbrook, gussy)\n\nRatify(rhoda, westbrook) and forall x (Ratify(x, westbrook) -> Canter(westbrook, gussy)) -> therefore Canter(westbrook, gussy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The charla jeer the shelia. The charla bespeckle the janith. The charla is jacksonian. The shelia bespeckle the charla. The shelia is prewar. The lenny jeer the janith. The lenny bespeckle the shelia. The janith jeer the shelia. The janith is jacksonian. The janith class the lenny. If something jeer the charla and it is beholden then the charla class the lenny. If something is bulimic then it class the shelia. If something bespeckle the lenny then the lenny is bulimic. If something jeer the shelia then the shelia bespeckle the lenny. If the shelia bespeckle the janith then the janith jeer the shelia. If something bespeckle the charla and it bespeckle the shelia then the shelia class the janith. The shelia does not eat the lenny.", "logic": "\nJeer(charla, shelia)\nBespeckle(charla, janith)\nJacksonian(charla)\nBespeckle(shelia, charla)\nPrewar(shelia)\nJeer(lenny, janith)\nBespeckle(lenny, shelia)\nJeer(janith, shelia)\nJacksonian(janith)\nClass(janith, lenny)\nforall x (Jeer(x, charla) and Beholden(x) -> Class(charla, lenny))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Class(x, shelia))\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, lenny) -> Bulimic(lenny))\nforall x (Jeer(x, shelia) -> Bespeckle(shelia, lenny))\nBespeckle(shelia, janith) -> Jeer(janith, shelia)\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, charla) and Bespeckle(x, shelia) -> Class(shelia, janith))\n\nnot Bespeckle(shelia, lenny)\n\nJeer(charla, shelia) and forall x (Jeer(x, shelia) -> Bespeckle(shelia, lenny)) -> therefore Bespeckle(shelia, lenny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The diane treasure the parker. The diane espouse the cleveland. The diane is european. The parker espouse the diane. The parker is unarmed. The tyrone treasure the cleveland. The tyrone espouse the parker. The cleveland treasure the parker. The cleveland is european. The cleveland peal the tyrone. If something treasure the diane and it is obtuse then the diane peal the tyrone. If something is babylonian then it peal the parker. If something espouse the tyrone then the tyrone is babylonian. If something treasure the parker then the parker espouse the tyrone. If the parker espouse the cleveland then the cleveland treasure the parker. If something espouse the diane and it espouse the parker then the parker peal the cleveland. The tyrone is babylonian.", "logic": "\nTreasure(diane, parker)\nEspouse(diane, cleveland)\nEuropean(diane)\nEspouse(parker, diane)\nUnarmed(parker)\nTreasure(tyrone, cleveland)\nEspouse(tyrone, parker)\nTreasure(cleveland, parker)\nEuropean(cleveland)\nPeal(cleveland, tyrone)\nforall x (Treasure(x, diane) and Obtuse(x) -> Peal(diane, tyrone))\nforall x (Babylonian(x) -> Peal(x, parker))\nforall x (Espouse(x, tyrone) -> Babylonian(tyrone))\nforall x (Treasure(x, parker) -> Espouse(parker, tyrone))\nEspouse(parker, cleveland) -> Treasure(cleveland, parker)\nforall x (Espouse(x, diane) and Espouse(x, parker) -> Peal(parker, cleveland))\n\nBabylonian(tyrone)\n\nTreasure(diane, parker) and forall x (Treasure(x, parker) -> Espouse(parker, tyrone)) -> therefore Espouse(parker, tyrone) Espouse(parker, tyrone) and forall x (Espouse(x, tyrone) -> Babylonian(tyrone)) -> therefore Babylonian(tyrone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The secunda descale the aurilia. The secunda frizz the aubrey. The secunda is raring. The aurilia frizz the secunda. The aurilia is mean. The jemmie descale the aubrey. The jemmie frizz the aurilia. The aubrey descale the aurilia. The aubrey is raring. The aubrey unlive the jemmie. If something descale the secunda and it is gluteal then the secunda unlive the jemmie. If something is illegible then it unlive the aurilia. If something frizz the jemmie then the jemmie is illegible. If something descale the aurilia then the aurilia frizz the jemmie. If the aurilia frizz the aubrey then the aubrey descale the aurilia. If something frizz the secunda and it frizz the aurilia then the aurilia unlive the aubrey. The jemmie is not illegible.", "logic": "\nDescale(secunda, aurilia)\nFrizz(secunda, aubrey)\nRaring(secunda)\nFrizz(aurilia, secunda)\nMean(aurilia)\nDescale(jemmie, aubrey)\nFrizz(jemmie, aurilia)\nDescale(aubrey, aurilia)\nRaring(aubrey)\nUnlive(aubrey, jemmie)\nforall x (Descale(x, secunda) and Gluteal(x) -> Unlive(secunda, jemmie))\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> Unlive(x, aurilia))\nforall x (Frizz(x, jemmie) -> Illegible(jemmie))\nforall x (Descale(x, aurilia) -> Frizz(aurilia, jemmie))\nFrizz(aurilia, aubrey) -> Descale(aubrey, aurilia)\nforall x (Frizz(x, secunda) and Frizz(x, aurilia) -> Unlive(aurilia, aubrey))\n\nnot Illegible(jemmie)\n\nDescale(secunda, aurilia) and forall x (Descale(x, aurilia) -> Frizz(aurilia, jemmie)) -> therefore Frizz(aurilia, jemmie) Frizz(aurilia, jemmie) and forall x (Frizz(x, jemmie) -> Illegible(jemmie)) -> therefore Illegible(jemmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The bobinette rollick the terra. The bobinette boss the guenevere. The bobinette is prudish. The terra boss the bobinette. The terra is dilatory. The consolata rollick the guenevere. The consolata boss the terra. The guenevere rollick the terra. The guenevere is prudish. The guenevere bewail the consolata. If something rollick the bobinette and it is veracious then the bobinette bewail the consolata. If something is saltish then it bewail the terra. If something boss the consolata then the consolata is saltish. If something rollick the terra then the terra boss the consolata. If the terra boss the guenevere then the guenevere rollick the terra. If something boss the bobinette and it boss the terra then the terra bewail the guenevere. The terra does not need the terra.", "logic": "\nRollick(bobinette, terra)\nBoss(bobinette, guenevere)\nPrudish(bobinette)\nBoss(terra, bobinette)\nDilatory(terra)\nRollick(consolata, guenevere)\nBoss(consolata, terra)\nRollick(guenevere, terra)\nPrudish(guenevere)\nBewail(guenevere, consolata)\nforall x (Rollick(x, bobinette) and Veracious(x) -> Bewail(bobinette, consolata))\nforall x (Saltish(x) -> Bewail(x, terra))\nforall x (Boss(x, consolata) -> Saltish(consolata))\nforall x (Rollick(x, terra) -> Boss(terra, consolata))\nBoss(terra, guenevere) -> Rollick(guenevere, terra)\nforall x (Boss(x, bobinette) and Boss(x, terra) -> Bewail(terra, guenevere))\n\nnot Bewail(terra, terra)\n\nforall x (Saltish(x) -> Bewail(x, terra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The mela demise the anni. The mela wipe the marielle. The mela is sixty. The anni wipe the mela. The anni is severe. The gideon demise the marielle. The gideon wipe the anni. The marielle demise the anni. The marielle is sixty. The marielle objurgate the gideon. If something demise the mela and it is agleam then the mela objurgate the gideon. If something is prime then it objurgate the anni. If something wipe the gideon then the gideon is prime. If something demise the anni then the anni wipe the gideon. If the anni wipe the marielle then the marielle demise the anni. If something wipe the mela and it wipe the anni then the anni objurgate the marielle. The marielle objurgate the anni.", "logic": "\nDemise(mela, anni)\nWipe(mela, marielle)\nSixty(mela)\nWipe(anni, mela)\nSevere(anni)\nDemise(gideon, marielle)\nWipe(gideon, anni)\nDemise(marielle, anni)\nSixty(marielle)\nObjurgate(marielle, gideon)\nforall x (Demise(x, mela) and Agleam(x) -> Objurgate(mela, gideon))\nforall x (Prime(x) -> Objurgate(x, anni))\nforall x (Wipe(x, gideon) -> Prime(gideon))\nforall x (Demise(x, anni) -> Wipe(anni, gideon))\nWipe(anni, marielle) -> Demise(marielle, anni)\nforall x (Wipe(x, mela) and Wipe(x, anni) -> Objurgate(anni, marielle))\n\nObjurgate(marielle, anni)\n\nforall x (Prime(x) -> Objurgate(x, anni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The kelvin tumesce the kathryne. The kelvin squat the kelwin. The kelvin is acapnic. The kathryne squat the kelvin. The kathryne is diocesan. The kissiah tumesce the kelwin. The kissiah squat the kathryne. The kelwin tumesce the kathryne. The kelwin is acapnic. The kelwin slice the kissiah. If something tumesce the kelvin and it is mimic then the kelvin slice the kissiah. If something is dialectic then it slice the kathryne. If something squat the kissiah then the kissiah is dialectic. If something tumesce the kathryne then the kathryne squat the kissiah. If the kathryne squat the kelwin then the kelwin tumesce the kathryne. If something squat the kelvin and it squat the kathryne then the kathryne slice the kelwin. The kathryne does not need the kelwin.", "logic": "\nTumesce(kelvin, kathryne)\nSquat(kelvin, kelwin)\nAcapnic(kelvin)\nSquat(kathryne, kelvin)\nDiocesan(kathryne)\nTumesce(kissiah, kelwin)\nSquat(kissiah, kathryne)\nTumesce(kelwin, kathryne)\nAcapnic(kelwin)\nSlice(kelwin, kissiah)\nforall x (Tumesce(x, kelvin) and Mimic(x) -> Slice(kelvin, kissiah))\nforall x (Dialectic(x) -> Slice(x, kathryne))\nforall x (Squat(x, kissiah) -> Dialectic(kissiah))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, kathryne) -> Squat(kathryne, kissiah))\nSquat(kathryne, kelwin) -> Tumesce(kelwin, kathryne)\nforall x (Squat(x, kelvin) and Squat(x, kathryne) -> Slice(kathryne, kelwin))\n\nnot Slice(kathryne, kelwin)\n\nforall x (Squat(x, kelvin) and Squat(x, kathryne) -> Slice(kathryne, kelwin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The wynne clue the jess. The wynne marvel the gwennie. The wynne is busted. The jess marvel the wynne. The jess is inert. The germana clue the gwennie. The germana marvel the jess. The gwennie clue the jess. The gwennie is busted. The gwennie rigidify the germana. If something clue the wynne and it is trilobated then the wynne rigidify the germana. If something is agrestic then it rigidify the jess. If something marvel the germana then the germana is agrestic. If something clue the jess then the jess marvel the germana. If the jess marvel the gwennie then the gwennie clue the jess. If something marvel the wynne and it marvel the jess then the jess rigidify the gwennie. The gwennie clue the wynne.", "logic": "\nClue(wynne, jess)\nMarvel(wynne, gwennie)\nBusted(wynne)\nMarvel(jess, wynne)\nInert(jess)\nClue(germana, gwennie)\nMarvel(germana, jess)\nClue(gwennie, jess)\nBusted(gwennie)\nRigidify(gwennie, germana)\nforall x (Clue(x, wynne) and Trilobated(x) -> Rigidify(wynne, germana))\nforall x (Agrestic(x) -> Rigidify(x, jess))\nforall x (Marvel(x, germana) -> Agrestic(germana))\nforall x (Clue(x, jess) -> Marvel(jess, germana))\nMarvel(jess, gwennie) -> Clue(gwennie, jess)\nforall x (Marvel(x, wynne) and Marvel(x, jess) -> Rigidify(jess, gwennie))\n\nClue(gwennie, wynne)\n\nClue(gwennie, wynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The marcile toil the angeline. The marcile enroll the gwendolin. The marcile is responsive. The angeline enroll the marcile. The angeline is narcotic. The bradley toil the gwendolin. The bradley enroll the angeline. The gwendolin toil the angeline. The gwendolin is responsive. The gwendolin swosh the bradley. If something toil the marcile and it is contrabass then the marcile swosh the bradley. If something is unprovoked then it swosh the angeline. If something enroll the bradley then the bradley is unprovoked. If something toil the angeline then the angeline enroll the bradley. If the angeline enroll the gwendolin then the gwendolin toil the angeline. If something enroll the marcile and it enroll the angeline then the angeline swosh the gwendolin. The marcile does not eat the bradley.", "logic": "\nToil(marcile, angeline)\nEnroll(marcile, gwendolin)\nResponsive(marcile)\nEnroll(angeline, marcile)\nNarcotic(angeline)\nToil(bradley, gwendolin)\nEnroll(bradley, angeline)\nToil(gwendolin, angeline)\nResponsive(gwendolin)\nSwosh(gwendolin, bradley)\nforall x (Toil(x, marcile) and Contrabass(x) -> Swosh(marcile, bradley))\nforall x (Unprovoked(x) -> Swosh(x, angeline))\nforall x (Enroll(x, bradley) -> Unprovoked(bradley))\nforall x (Toil(x, angeline) -> Enroll(angeline, bradley))\nEnroll(angeline, gwendolin) -> Toil(gwendolin, angeline)\nforall x (Enroll(x, marcile) and Enroll(x, angeline) -> Swosh(angeline, gwendolin))\n\nnot Enroll(marcile, bradley)\n\nnot Enroll(marcile, bradley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "The sarine unlace the benny. The sarine keen the vivia. The sarine is outlined. The benny keen the sarine. The benny is changeful. The olenka unlace the vivia. The olenka keen the benny. The vivia unlace the benny. The vivia is outlined. The vivia rusticate the olenka. If something unlace the sarine and it is ungrasped then the sarine rusticate the olenka. If something is jovian then it rusticate the benny. If something keen the olenka then the olenka is jovian. If something unlace the benny then the benny keen the olenka. If the benny keen the vivia then the vivia unlace the benny. If something keen the sarine and it keen the benny then the benny rusticate the vivia. The olenka unlace the sarine.", "logic": "\nUnlace(sarine, benny)\nKeen(sarine, vivia)\nOutlined(sarine)\nKeen(benny, sarine)\nChangeful(benny)\nUnlace(olenka, vivia)\nKeen(olenka, benny)\nUnlace(vivia, benny)\nOutlined(vivia)\nRusticate(vivia, olenka)\nforall x (Unlace(x, sarine) and Ungrasped(x) -> Rusticate(sarine, olenka))\nforall x (Jovian(x) -> Rusticate(x, benny))\nforall x (Keen(x, olenka) -> Jovian(olenka))\nforall x (Unlace(x, benny) -> Keen(benny, olenka))\nKeen(benny, vivia) -> Unlace(vivia, benny)\nforall x (Keen(x, sarine) and Keen(x, benny) -> Rusticate(benny, vivia))\n\nUnlace(olenka, sarine)\n\nUnlace(olenka, sarine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-538"} {"premises": "Genia is bipolar. Genia is literal. Genia is faraway. Genia is controlled. Stella is literal. Stella is epiphysial. Athena is literal. Athena is glistening. Athena is faraway. Athena is controlled. Micheline is tottering. Micheline is bipolar. Micheline is literal. Micheline is faraway. Micheline is epiphysial. Micheline is controlled. All glistening things are bipolar. Blue things are epiphysial. Genia is controlled.", "logic": "\nBipolar(genia)\nLiteral(genia)\nFaraway(genia)\nControlled(genia)\nLiteral(stella)\nEpiphysial(stella)\nLiteral(athena)\nGlistening(athena)\nFaraway(athena)\nControlled(athena)\nTottering(micheline)\nBipolar(micheline)\nLiteral(micheline)\nFaraway(micheline)\nEpiphysial(micheline)\nControlled(micheline)\nforall x (Glistening(x) -> Bipolar(x))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) -> Epiphysial(x))\n\nControlled(genia)\n\ntherefore Controlled(genia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Wade is living. Wade is bulimic. Wade is polyoicous. Wade is debile. Roda is bulimic. Roda is chilling. Verney is bulimic. Verney is homogenous. Verney is polyoicous. Verney is debile. Alexia is eleven. Alexia is living. Alexia is bulimic. Alexia is polyoicous. Alexia is chilling. Alexia is debile. All homogenous things are living. Blue things are chilling. Alexia is not eleven.", "logic": "\nLiving(wade)\nBulimic(wade)\nPolyoicous(wade)\nDebile(wade)\nBulimic(roda)\nChilling(roda)\nBulimic(verney)\nHomogenous(verney)\nPolyoicous(verney)\nDebile(verney)\nEleven(alexia)\nLiving(alexia)\nBulimic(alexia)\nPolyoicous(alexia)\nChilling(alexia)\nDebile(alexia)\nforall x (Homogenous(x) -> Living(x))\nforall x (Living(x) -> Chilling(x))\n\nnot Eleven(alexia)\n\ntherefore Eleven(alexia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Jasper is trig. Jasper is shamanist. Jasper is metabolic. Jasper is dipped. Edouard is shamanist. Edouard is blastemal. Tremaine is shamanist. Tremaine is alopecic. Tremaine is metabolic. Tremaine is dipped. Luigi is idolized. Luigi is trig. Luigi is shamanist. Luigi is metabolic. Luigi is blastemal. Luigi is dipped. All alopecic things are trig. Blue things are blastemal. Tremaine is trig.", "logic": "\nTrig(jasper)\nShamanist(jasper)\nMetabolic(jasper)\nDipped(jasper)\nShamanist(edouard)\nBlastemal(edouard)\nShamanist(tremaine)\nAlopecic(tremaine)\nMetabolic(tremaine)\nDipped(tremaine)\nIdolized(luigi)\nTrig(luigi)\nShamanist(luigi)\nMetabolic(luigi)\nBlastemal(luigi)\nDipped(luigi)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Trig(x) -> Blastemal(x))\n\nTrig(tremaine)\n\nAlopecic(tremaine) and forall x (Alopecic(x) -> Trig(x)) -> therefore Trig(tremaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Herschel is atheistic. Herschel is fugitive. Herschel is gullible. Herschel is superlunar. Cordy is fugitive. Cordy is ribald. Sibella is fugitive. Sibella is comestible. Sibella is gullible. Sibella is superlunar. Lay is seraphical. Lay is atheistic. Lay is fugitive. Lay is gullible. Lay is ribald. Lay is superlunar. All comestible things are atheistic. Blue things are ribald. Herschel is not ribald.", "logic": "\nAtheistic(herschel)\nFugitive(herschel)\nGullible(herschel)\nSuperlunar(herschel)\nFugitive(cordy)\nRibald(cordy)\nFugitive(sibella)\nComestible(sibella)\nGullible(sibella)\nSuperlunar(sibella)\nSeraphical(lay)\nAtheistic(lay)\nFugitive(lay)\nGullible(lay)\nRibald(lay)\nSuperlunar(lay)\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Atheistic(x))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) -> Ribald(x))\n\nnot Ribald(herschel)\n\nAtheistic(herschel) and forall x (Atheistic(x) -> Ribald(x)) -> therefore Ribald(herschel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Judie is maiden. Judie is unfixed. Judie is barelegged. Judie is bittie. Allin is unfixed. Allin is apothecial. Bernice is unfixed. Bernice is lingual. Bernice is barelegged. Bernice is bittie. Fleming is esophageal. Fleming is maiden. Fleming is unfixed. Fleming is barelegged. Fleming is apothecial. Fleming is bittie. All lingual things are maiden. Blue things are apothecial. Bernice is apothecial.", "logic": "\nMaiden(judie)\nUnfixed(judie)\nBarelegged(judie)\nBittie(judie)\nUnfixed(allin)\nApothecial(allin)\nUnfixed(bernice)\nLingual(bernice)\nBarelegged(bernice)\nBittie(bernice)\nEsophageal(fleming)\nMaiden(fleming)\nUnfixed(fleming)\nBarelegged(fleming)\nApothecial(fleming)\nBittie(fleming)\nforall x (Lingual(x) -> Maiden(x))\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> Apothecial(x))\n\nApothecial(bernice)\n\nLingual(bernice) and forall x (Lingual(x) -> Maiden(x)) -> therefore Maiden(bernice) Maiden(bernice) and forall x (Maiden(x) -> Apothecial(x)) -> therefore Apothecial(bernice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Swen is neotenous. Swen is southward. Swen is nonmetal. Swen is emotive. Cyrille is southward. Cyrille is indebted. Morena is southward. Morena is sonsy. Morena is nonmetal. Morena is emotive. Rosabel is unplumbed. Rosabel is neotenous. Rosabel is southward. Rosabel is nonmetal. Rosabel is indebted. Rosabel is emotive. All sonsy things are neotenous. Blue things are indebted. Morena is not indebted.", "logic": "\nNeotenous(swen)\nSouthward(swen)\nNonmetal(swen)\nEmotive(swen)\nSouthward(cyrille)\nIndebted(cyrille)\nSouthward(morena)\nSonsy(morena)\nNonmetal(morena)\nEmotive(morena)\nUnplumbed(rosabel)\nNeotenous(rosabel)\nSouthward(rosabel)\nNonmetal(rosabel)\nIndebted(rosabel)\nEmotive(rosabel)\nforall x (Sonsy(x) -> Neotenous(x))\nforall x (Neotenous(x) -> Indebted(x))\n\nnot Indebted(morena)\n\nSonsy(morena) and forall x (Sonsy(x) -> Neotenous(x)) -> therefore Neotenous(morena) Neotenous(morena) and forall x (Neotenous(x) -> Indebted(x)) -> therefore Indebted(morena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Quinta is sapphic. Quinta is uncousinly. Quinta is curled. Quinta is getatable. Deny is uncousinly. Deny is insidious. Roderick is uncousinly. Roderick is dentate. Roderick is curled. Roderick is getatable. Hilarie is clothed. Hilarie is sapphic. Hilarie is uncousinly. Hilarie is curled. Hilarie is insidious. Hilarie is getatable. All dentate things are sapphic. Blue things are insidious. Deny is not sapphic.", "logic": "\nSapphic(quinta)\nUncousinly(quinta)\nCurled(quinta)\nGetatable(quinta)\nUncousinly(deny)\nInsidious(deny)\nUncousinly(roderick)\nDentate(roderick)\nCurled(roderick)\nGetatable(roderick)\nClothed(hilarie)\nSapphic(hilarie)\nUncousinly(hilarie)\nCurled(hilarie)\nInsidious(hilarie)\nGetatable(hilarie)\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> Sapphic(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) -> Insidious(x))\n\nnot Sapphic(deny)\n\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> Sapphic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Georgina is spidery. Georgina is geocentric. Georgina is bareback. Georgina is risen. Sandy is geocentric. Sandy is narcotised. Danice is geocentric. Danice is sourish. Danice is bareback. Danice is risen. Darda is humourous. Darda is spidery. Darda is geocentric. Darda is bareback. Darda is narcotised. Darda is risen. All sourish things are spidery. Blue things are narcotised. Georgina is sourish.", "logic": "\nSpidery(georgina)\nGeocentric(georgina)\nBareback(georgina)\nRisen(georgina)\nGeocentric(sandy)\nNarcotised(sandy)\nGeocentric(danice)\nSourish(danice)\nBareback(danice)\nRisen(danice)\nHumourous(darda)\nSpidery(darda)\nGeocentric(darda)\nBareback(darda)\nNarcotised(darda)\nRisen(darda)\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Spidery(x))\nforall x (Spidery(x) -> Narcotised(x))\n\nSourish(georgina)\n\nSourish(georgina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Linoel is disdainful. Linoel is nonlexical. Linoel is horrid. Linoel is zimbabwean. Shawnee is nonlexical. Shawnee is depletable. Erminie is nonlexical. Erminie is famous. Erminie is horrid. Erminie is zimbabwean. Rubie is curved. Rubie is disdainful. Rubie is nonlexical. Rubie is horrid. Rubie is depletable. Rubie is zimbabwean. All famous things are disdainful. Blue things are depletable. Erminie is not curved.", "logic": "\nDisdainful(linoel)\nNonlexical(linoel)\nHorrid(linoel)\nZimbabwean(linoel)\nNonlexical(shawnee)\nDepletable(shawnee)\nNonlexical(erminie)\nFamous(erminie)\nHorrid(erminie)\nZimbabwean(erminie)\nCurved(rubie)\nDisdainful(rubie)\nNonlexical(rubie)\nHorrid(rubie)\nDepletable(rubie)\nZimbabwean(rubie)\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Disdainful(x) -> Depletable(x))\n\nnot Curved(erminie)\n\nnot Curved(erminie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Caresa is suety. Caresa is despairing. Caresa is distaff. Caresa is contrasty. Marilin is despairing. Marilin is membranous. Franni is despairing. Franni is slumbery. Franni is distaff. Franni is contrasty. Ellen is altruistic. Ellen is suety. Ellen is despairing. Ellen is distaff. Ellen is membranous. Ellen is contrasty. All slumbery things are suety. Blue things are membranous. Marilin is slumbery.", "logic": "\nSuety(caresa)\nDespairing(caresa)\nDistaff(caresa)\nContrasty(caresa)\nDespairing(marilin)\nMembranous(marilin)\nDespairing(franni)\nSlumbery(franni)\nDistaff(franni)\nContrasty(franni)\nAltruistic(ellen)\nSuety(ellen)\nDespairing(ellen)\nDistaff(ellen)\nMembranous(ellen)\nContrasty(ellen)\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Suety(x))\nforall x (Suety(x) -> Membranous(x))\n\nSlumbery(marilin)\n\nSlumbery(marilin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Kennedy is lone. Kennedy is mormon. Kennedy is brazen. Kennedy is unplayful. Calli is mormon. Calli is maimed. Theodor is mormon. Theodor is tinseled. Theodor is brazen. Theodor is unplayful. Chastity is voluptuous. Chastity is lone. Chastity is mormon. Chastity is brazen. Chastity is maimed. Chastity is unplayful. All tinseled things are lone. Blue things are maimed. Kennedy is not voluptuous.", "logic": "\nLone(kennedy)\nMormon(kennedy)\nBrazen(kennedy)\nUnplayful(kennedy)\nMormon(calli)\nMaimed(calli)\nMormon(theodor)\nTinseled(theodor)\nBrazen(theodor)\nUnplayful(theodor)\nVoluptuous(chastity)\nLone(chastity)\nMormon(chastity)\nBrazen(chastity)\nMaimed(chastity)\nUnplayful(chastity)\nforall x (Tinseled(x) -> Lone(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Maimed(x))\n\nnot Voluptuous(kennedy)\n\nnot Voluptuous(kennedy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Lelia is aldermanly. Lelia is opened. Lelia is tremulous. Lelia is inboard. Idalia is opened. Idalia is noticeable. Millisent is opened. Millisent is euphoriant. Millisent is tremulous. Millisent is inboard. Wanda is liturgical. Wanda is aldermanly. Wanda is opened. Wanda is tremulous. Wanda is noticeable. Wanda is inboard. All euphoriant things are aldermanly. Blue things are noticeable. Idalia is tremulous.", "logic": "\nAldermanly(lelia)\nOpened(lelia)\nTremulous(lelia)\nInboard(lelia)\nOpened(idalia)\nNoticeable(idalia)\nOpened(millisent)\nEuphoriant(millisent)\nTremulous(millisent)\nInboard(millisent)\nLiturgical(wanda)\nAldermanly(wanda)\nOpened(wanda)\nTremulous(wanda)\nNoticeable(wanda)\nInboard(wanda)\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) -> Aldermanly(x))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Noticeable(x))\n\nTremulous(idalia)\n\nTremulous(idalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1624"} {"premises": "Connor is corneous. Connor is nautical. Joli is corneous. Joli is not brindled. Joli is septuple. Joli is cautionary. Alana is corneous. Alana is nautical. Alana is brindled. Alana is not unyielding. Rosemonde is brindled. Rosemonde is septuple. If Connor is dextral and Connor is cautionary then Connor is septuple. If Joli is cautionary and Joli is not brindled then Joli is septuple. If someone is corneous then they are cautionary. Red people are corneous. All septuple, cautionary people are nautical. If Connor is dextral and Connor is unyielding then Connor is brindled. All corneous people are dextral. If Connor is cautionary and Connor is nautical then Connor is not unyielding. Alana is not unyielding.", "logic": "\nCorneous(connor)\nNautical(connor)\nCorneous(joli)\nnot Brindled(joli)\nSeptuple(joli)\nCautionary(joli)\nCorneous(alana)\nNautical(alana)\nBrindled(alana)\nnot Unyielding(alana)\nBrindled(rosemonde)\nSeptuple(rosemonde)\nDextral(connor) and Cautionary(connor) -> Septuple(connor)\nCautionary(joli) and not Brindled(joli) -> Septuple(joli)\nforall x (Corneous(x) -> Cautionary(x))\nforall x (Unyielding(x) -> Corneous(x))\nforall x (Septuple(x) and Cautionary(x) -> Nautical(x))\nDextral(connor) and Unyielding(connor) -> Brindled(connor)\nforall x (Corneous(x) -> Dextral(x))\nCautionary(connor) and Nautical(connor) -> not Unyielding(connor)\n\nnot Unyielding(alana)\n\ntherefore not Unyielding(alana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Demetris is spoilable. Demetris is generative. Missie is spoilable. Missie is not umbilical. Missie is tyrannic. Missie is provisory. Christal is spoilable. Christal is generative. Christal is umbilical. Christal is not false. Chrissy is umbilical. Chrissy is tyrannic. If Demetris is unforested and Demetris is provisory then Demetris is tyrannic. If Missie is provisory and Missie is not umbilical then Missie is tyrannic. If someone is spoilable then they are provisory. Red people are spoilable. All tyrannic, provisory people are generative. If Demetris is unforested and Demetris is false then Demetris is umbilical. All spoilable people are unforested. If Demetris is provisory and Demetris is generative then Demetris is not false. Christal is false.", "logic": "\nSpoilable(demetris)\nGenerative(demetris)\nSpoilable(missie)\nnot Umbilical(missie)\nTyrannic(missie)\nProvisory(missie)\nSpoilable(christal)\nGenerative(christal)\nUmbilical(christal)\nnot False(christal)\nUmbilical(chrissy)\nTyrannic(chrissy)\nUnforested(demetris) and Provisory(demetris) -> Tyrannic(demetris)\nProvisory(missie) and not Umbilical(missie) -> Tyrannic(missie)\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Provisory(x))\nforall x (False(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Tyrannic(x) and Provisory(x) -> Generative(x))\nUnforested(demetris) and False(demetris) -> Umbilical(demetris)\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Unforested(x))\nProvisory(demetris) and Generative(demetris) -> not False(demetris)\n\nFalse(christal)\n\ntherefore not False(christal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Jamima is puppylike. Jamima is ferine. Chris is puppylike. Chris is not quaternate. Chris is tumid. Chris is undepicted. Filip is puppylike. Filip is ferine. Filip is quaternate. Filip is not exaugural. Dorette is quaternate. Dorette is tumid. If Jamima is sapiens and Jamima is undepicted then Jamima is tumid. If Chris is undepicted and Chris is not quaternate then Chris is tumid. If someone is puppylike then they are undepicted. Red people are puppylike. All tumid, undepicted people are ferine. If Jamima is sapiens and Jamima is exaugural then Jamima is quaternate. All puppylike people are sapiens. If Jamima is undepicted and Jamima is ferine then Jamima is not exaugural. Filip is undepicted.", "logic": "\nPuppylike(jamima)\nFerine(jamima)\nPuppylike(chris)\nnot Quaternate(chris)\nTumid(chris)\nUndepicted(chris)\nPuppylike(filip)\nFerine(filip)\nQuaternate(filip)\nnot Exaugural(filip)\nQuaternate(dorette)\nTumid(dorette)\nSapiens(jamima) and Undepicted(jamima) -> Tumid(jamima)\nUndepicted(chris) and not Quaternate(chris) -> Tumid(chris)\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Tumid(x) and Undepicted(x) -> Ferine(x))\nSapiens(jamima) and Exaugural(jamima) -> Quaternate(jamima)\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> Sapiens(x))\nUndepicted(jamima) and Ferine(jamima) -> not Exaugural(jamima)\n\nUndepicted(filip)\n\nPuppylike(filip) and forall x (Puppylike(x) -> Undepicted(x)) -> therefore Undepicted(filip)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Algernon is stainless. Algernon is homosexual. Rachele is stainless. Rachele is not stung. Rachele is boyish. Rachele is staged. Dwain is stainless. Dwain is homosexual. Dwain is stung. Dwain is not wound. Dacia is stung. Dacia is boyish. If Algernon is leftover and Algernon is staged then Algernon is boyish. If Rachele is staged and Rachele is not stung then Rachele is boyish. If someone is stainless then they are staged. Red people are stainless. All boyish, staged people are homosexual. If Algernon is leftover and Algernon is wound then Algernon is stung. All stainless people are leftover. If Algernon is staged and Algernon is homosexual then Algernon is not wound. Algernon is not staged.", "logic": "\nStainless(algernon)\nHomosexual(algernon)\nStainless(rachele)\nnot Stung(rachele)\nBoyish(rachele)\nStaged(rachele)\nStainless(dwain)\nHomosexual(dwain)\nStung(dwain)\nnot Wound(dwain)\nStung(dacia)\nBoyish(dacia)\nLeftover(algernon) and Staged(algernon) -> Boyish(algernon)\nStaged(rachele) and not Stung(rachele) -> Boyish(rachele)\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Staged(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Stainless(x))\nforall x (Boyish(x) and Staged(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nLeftover(algernon) and Wound(algernon) -> Stung(algernon)\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Leftover(x))\nStaged(algernon) and Homosexual(algernon) -> not Wound(algernon)\n\nnot Staged(algernon)\n\nStainless(algernon) and forall x (Stainless(x) -> Staged(x)) -> therefore Staged(algernon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Enrico is grisly. Enrico is advance. Randal is grisly. Randal is not furnished. Randal is varnished. Randal is serrulate. Regen is grisly. Regen is advance. Regen is furnished. Regen is not profitable. Hersch is furnished. Hersch is varnished. If Enrico is addictive and Enrico is serrulate then Enrico is varnished. If Randal is serrulate and Randal is not furnished then Randal is varnished. If someone is grisly then they are serrulate. Red people are grisly. All varnished, serrulate people are advance. If Enrico is addictive and Enrico is profitable then Enrico is furnished. All grisly people are addictive. If Enrico is serrulate and Enrico is advance then Enrico is not profitable. Enrico is not profitable.", "logic": "\nGrisly(enrico)\nAdvance(enrico)\nGrisly(randal)\nnot Furnished(randal)\nVarnished(randal)\nSerrulate(randal)\nGrisly(regen)\nAdvance(regen)\nFurnished(regen)\nnot Profitable(regen)\nFurnished(hersch)\nVarnished(hersch)\nAddictive(enrico) and Serrulate(enrico) -> Varnished(enrico)\nSerrulate(randal) and not Furnished(randal) -> Varnished(randal)\nforall x (Grisly(x) -> Serrulate(x))\nforall x (Profitable(x) -> Grisly(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) and Serrulate(x) -> Advance(x))\nAddictive(enrico) and Profitable(enrico) -> Furnished(enrico)\nforall x (Grisly(x) -> Addictive(x))\nSerrulate(enrico) and Advance(enrico) -> not Profitable(enrico)\n\nnot Profitable(enrico)\n\nGrisly(enrico) and forall x (Grisly(x) -> Serrulate(x)) -> therefore Serrulate(enrico) Serrulate(enrico) and Advance(enrico) and Serrulate(enrico) and Advance(enrico) -> not Profitable(enrico) -> therefore not Profitable(enrico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Katha is septate. Katha is rushy. Haley is septate. Haley is not courageous. Haley is nasty. Haley is unfearing. Sal is septate. Sal is rushy. Sal is courageous. Sal is not selfsame. Samuele is courageous. Samuele is nasty. If Katha is irish and Katha is unfearing then Katha is nasty. If Haley is unfearing and Haley is not courageous then Haley is nasty. If someone is septate then they are unfearing. Red people are septate. All nasty, unfearing people are rushy. If Katha is irish and Katha is selfsame then Katha is courageous. All septate people are irish. If Katha is unfearing and Katha is rushy then Katha is not selfsame. Katha is not nasty.", "logic": "\nSeptate(katha)\nRushy(katha)\nSeptate(haley)\nnot Courageous(haley)\nNasty(haley)\nUnfearing(haley)\nSeptate(sal)\nRushy(sal)\nCourageous(sal)\nnot Selfsame(sal)\nCourageous(samuele)\nNasty(samuele)\nIrish(katha) and Unfearing(katha) -> Nasty(katha)\nUnfearing(haley) and not Courageous(haley) -> Nasty(haley)\nforall x (Septate(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Selfsame(x) -> Septate(x))\nforall x (Nasty(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Rushy(x))\nIrish(katha) and Selfsame(katha) -> Courageous(katha)\nforall x (Septate(x) -> Irish(x))\nUnfearing(katha) and Rushy(katha) -> not Selfsame(katha)\n\nnot Nasty(katha)\n\nSeptate(katha) and forall x (Septate(x) -> Irish(x)) -> therefore Irish(katha) Septate(katha) and forall x (Septate(x) -> Unfearing(x)) -> therefore Unfearing(katha) Irish(katha) and Unfearing(katha) and Irish(katha) and Unfearing(katha) -> Nasty(katha) -> therefore Nasty(katha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Maye is untanned. Maye is bodily. Greta is untanned. Greta is not abusive. Greta is isotropous. Greta is alienable. Rory is untanned. Rory is bodily. Rory is abusive. Rory is not oligarchic. Clerissa is abusive. Clerissa is isotropous. If Maye is apocarpous and Maye is alienable then Maye is isotropous. If Greta is alienable and Greta is not abusive then Greta is isotropous. If someone is untanned then they are alienable. Red people are untanned. All isotropous, alienable people are bodily. If Maye is apocarpous and Maye is oligarchic then Maye is abusive. All untanned people are apocarpous. If Maye is alienable and Maye is bodily then Maye is not oligarchic. Clerissa is not apocarpous.", "logic": "\nUntanned(maye)\nBodily(maye)\nUntanned(greta)\nnot Abusive(greta)\nIsotropous(greta)\nAlienable(greta)\nUntanned(rory)\nBodily(rory)\nAbusive(rory)\nnot Oligarchic(rory)\nAbusive(clerissa)\nIsotropous(clerissa)\nApocarpous(maye) and Alienable(maye) -> Isotropous(maye)\nAlienable(greta) and not Abusive(greta) -> Isotropous(greta)\nforall x (Untanned(x) -> Alienable(x))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Untanned(x))\nforall x (Isotropous(x) and Alienable(x) -> Bodily(x))\nApocarpous(maye) and Oligarchic(maye) -> Abusive(maye)\nforall x (Untanned(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nAlienable(maye) and Bodily(maye) -> not Oligarchic(maye)\n\nnot Apocarpous(clerissa)\n\nforall x (Untanned(x) -> Apocarpous(x)) <- forall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Untanned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Stephani is twinkly. Stephani is inimical. Tandie is twinkly. Tandie is not jacobinic. Tandie is granted. Tandie is freckled. Antonie is twinkly. Antonie is inimical. Antonie is jacobinic. Antonie is not suggestive. Delaney is jacobinic. Delaney is granted. If Stephani is ambient and Stephani is freckled then Stephani is granted. If Tandie is freckled and Tandie is not jacobinic then Tandie is granted. If someone is twinkly then they are freckled. Red people are twinkly. All granted, freckled people are inimical. If Stephani is ambient and Stephani is suggestive then Stephani is jacobinic. All twinkly people are ambient. If Stephani is freckled and Stephani is inimical then Stephani is not suggestive. Delaney is inimical.", "logic": "\nTwinkly(stephani)\nInimical(stephani)\nTwinkly(tandie)\nnot Jacobinic(tandie)\nGranted(tandie)\nFreckled(tandie)\nTwinkly(antonie)\nInimical(antonie)\nJacobinic(antonie)\nnot Suggestive(antonie)\nJacobinic(delaney)\nGranted(delaney)\nAmbient(stephani) and Freckled(stephani) -> Granted(stephani)\nFreckled(tandie) and not Jacobinic(tandie) -> Granted(tandie)\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Freckled(x))\nforall x (Suggestive(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nforall x (Granted(x) and Freckled(x) -> Inimical(x))\nAmbient(stephani) and Suggestive(stephani) -> Jacobinic(stephani)\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Ambient(x))\nFreckled(stephani) and Inimical(stephani) -> not Suggestive(stephani)\n\nInimical(delaney)\n\nforall x (Granted(x) and Freckled(x) -> Inimical(x)) <- forall x (Twinkly(x) -> Freckled(x)) <- forall x (Suggestive(x) -> Twinkly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Gerard is dowered. Gerard is xenophobic. Sherwin is dowered. Sherwin is not native. Sherwin is nestled. Sherwin is degenerate. Joelle is dowered. Joelle is xenophobic. Joelle is native. Joelle is not raiseable. Darline is native. Darline is nestled. If Gerard is enfeebling and Gerard is degenerate then Gerard is nestled. If Sherwin is degenerate and Sherwin is not native then Sherwin is nestled. If someone is dowered then they are degenerate. Red people are dowered. All nestled, degenerate people are xenophobic. If Gerard is enfeebling and Gerard is raiseable then Gerard is native. All dowered people are enfeebling. If Gerard is degenerate and Gerard is xenophobic then Gerard is not raiseable. Gerard is not native.", "logic": "\nDowered(gerard)\nXenophobic(gerard)\nDowered(sherwin)\nnot Native(sherwin)\nNestled(sherwin)\nDegenerate(sherwin)\nDowered(joelle)\nXenophobic(joelle)\nNative(joelle)\nnot Raiseable(joelle)\nNative(darline)\nNestled(darline)\nEnfeebling(gerard) and Degenerate(gerard) -> Nestled(gerard)\nDegenerate(sherwin) and not Native(sherwin) -> Nestled(sherwin)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Degenerate(x))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) -> Dowered(x))\nforall x (Nestled(x) and Degenerate(x) -> Xenophobic(x))\nEnfeebling(gerard) and Raiseable(gerard) -> Native(gerard)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nDegenerate(gerard) and Xenophobic(gerard) -> not Raiseable(gerard)\n\nnot Native(gerard)\n\nEnfeebling(gerard) and Raiseable(gerard) -> Native(gerard) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Andee is andante. Andee is catoptric. Bree is andante. Bree is not inorganic. Bree is paroxysmal. Bree is last. Sissie is andante. Sissie is catoptric. Sissie is inorganic. Sissie is not encased. Nathalie is inorganic. Nathalie is paroxysmal. If Andee is ignorant and Andee is last then Andee is paroxysmal. If Bree is last and Bree is not inorganic then Bree is paroxysmal. If someone is andante then they are last. Red people are andante. All paroxysmal, last people are catoptric. If Andee is ignorant and Andee is encased then Andee is inorganic. All andante people are ignorant. If Andee is last and Andee is catoptric then Andee is not encased. Nathalie is encased.", "logic": "\nAndante(andee)\nCatoptric(andee)\nAndante(bree)\nnot Inorganic(bree)\nParoxysmal(bree)\nLast(bree)\nAndante(sissie)\nCatoptric(sissie)\nInorganic(sissie)\nnot Encased(sissie)\nInorganic(nathalie)\nParoxysmal(nathalie)\nIgnorant(andee) and Last(andee) -> Paroxysmal(andee)\nLast(bree) and not Inorganic(bree) -> Paroxysmal(bree)\nforall x (Andante(x) -> Last(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) -> Andante(x))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) and Last(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nIgnorant(andee) and Encased(andee) -> Inorganic(andee)\nforall x (Andante(x) -> Ignorant(x))\nLast(andee) and Catoptric(andee) -> not Encased(andee)\n\nEncased(nathalie)\n\nEncased(nathalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "August is biracial. August is staminate. Mariette is biracial. Mariette is not endowed. Mariette is grainy. Mariette is recovered. Letty is biracial. Letty is staminate. Letty is endowed. Letty is not nonhuman. Tony is endowed. Tony is grainy. If August is overland and August is recovered then August is grainy. If Mariette is recovered and Mariette is not endowed then Mariette is grainy. If someone is biracial then they are recovered. Red people are biracial. All grainy, recovered people are staminate. If August is overland and August is nonhuman then August is endowed. All biracial people are overland. If August is recovered and August is staminate then August is not nonhuman. Letty is not grainy.", "logic": "\nBiracial(august)\nStaminate(august)\nBiracial(mariette)\nnot Endowed(mariette)\nGrainy(mariette)\nRecovered(mariette)\nBiracial(letty)\nStaminate(letty)\nEndowed(letty)\nnot Nonhuman(letty)\nEndowed(tony)\nGrainy(tony)\nOverland(august) and Recovered(august) -> Grainy(august)\nRecovered(mariette) and not Endowed(mariette) -> Grainy(mariette)\nforall x (Biracial(x) -> Recovered(x))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) -> Biracial(x))\nforall x (Grainy(x) and Recovered(x) -> Staminate(x))\nOverland(august) and Nonhuman(august) -> Endowed(august)\nforall x (Biracial(x) -> Overland(x))\nRecovered(august) and Staminate(august) -> not Nonhuman(august)\n\nnot Grainy(letty)\n\nnot Grainy(letty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "Lesya is alexic. Lesya is semiannual. Wolfie is alexic. Wolfie is not tiptoe. Wolfie is cloggy. Wolfie is sick. Lilia is alexic. Lilia is semiannual. Lilia is tiptoe. Lilia is not unsuitable. Glori is tiptoe. Glori is cloggy. If Lesya is monogamous and Lesya is sick then Lesya is cloggy. If Wolfie is sick and Wolfie is not tiptoe then Wolfie is cloggy. If someone is alexic then they are sick. Red people are alexic. All cloggy, sick people are semiannual. If Lesya is monogamous and Lesya is unsuitable then Lesya is tiptoe. All alexic people are monogamous. If Lesya is sick and Lesya is semiannual then Lesya is not unsuitable. Wolfie is unsuitable.", "logic": "\nAlexic(lesya)\nSemiannual(lesya)\nAlexic(wolfie)\nnot Tiptoe(wolfie)\nCloggy(wolfie)\nSick(wolfie)\nAlexic(lilia)\nSemiannual(lilia)\nTiptoe(lilia)\nnot Unsuitable(lilia)\nTiptoe(glori)\nCloggy(glori)\nMonogamous(lesya) and Sick(lesya) -> Cloggy(lesya)\nSick(wolfie) and not Tiptoe(wolfie) -> Cloggy(wolfie)\nforall x (Alexic(x) -> Sick(x))\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Alexic(x))\nforall x (Cloggy(x) and Sick(x) -> Semiannual(x))\nMonogamous(lesya) and Unsuitable(lesya) -> Tiptoe(lesya)\nforall x (Alexic(x) -> Monogamous(x))\nSick(lesya) and Semiannual(lesya) -> not Unsuitable(lesya)\n\nUnsuitable(wolfie)\n\nUnsuitable(wolfie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-360"} {"premises": "The sherill is abdominal. The sherill journey the rinaldo. The rinaldo spin the sherwin. The rinaldo is not adjective. The rinaldo is flaring. The rinaldo journey the sherill. The rinaldo does not see the sherwin. The rinaldo cobble the sherwin. The sherwin spin the rinaldo. The sherwin is unmated. The sherwin is adjective. The sherwin journey the sherill. The sherwin journey the rinaldo. The sherwin cobble the sherill. The sherwin cobble the rinaldo. If someone is abdominal and they see the sherwin then the sherwin does not see the rinaldo. If someone is unmated and not xxviii then they do not see the sherwin. If someone cobble the rinaldo then they do not eat the sherwin. If someone spin the rinaldo and they do not eat the sherwin then the rinaldo cobble the sherill. If someone cobble the sherill then the sherill cobble the sherwin. If someone spin the rinaldo and the rinaldo cobble the sherill then they see the sherill. The sherill is abdominal.", "logic": "\nAbdominal(sherill)\nJourney(sherill, rinaldo)\nSpin(rinaldo, sherwin)\nnot Adjective(rinaldo)\nFlaring(rinaldo)\nJourney(rinaldo, sherill)\nnot Journey(rinaldo, sherwin)\nCobble(rinaldo, sherwin)\nSpin(sherwin, rinaldo)\nUnmated(sherwin)\nAdjective(sherwin)\nJourney(sherwin, sherill)\nJourney(sherwin, rinaldo)\nCobble(sherwin, sherill)\nCobble(sherwin, rinaldo)\nforall x (Abdominal(x) and Journey(x, sherwin) -> not Journey(sherwin, rinaldo))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and not Xxviii(x) -> not Journey(x, sherwin))\nforall x (Cobble(x, rinaldo) -> not Spin(x, sherwin))\nforall x (Spin(x, rinaldo) and not Spin(x, sherwin) -> Cobble(rinaldo, sherill))\nforall x (Cobble(x, sherill) -> Cobble(sherill, sherwin))\nforall x (Spin(x, rinaldo) and Cobble(rinaldo, sherill) -> Journey(x, sherill))\n\nAbdominal(sherill)\n\ntherefore Abdominal(sherill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The karlene is folksy. The karlene carol the neel. The neel unitize the karolina. The neel is not undried. The neel is rotary. The neel carol the karlene. The neel does not see the karolina. The neel abuse the karolina. The karolina unitize the neel. The karolina is autonomous. The karolina is undried. The karolina carol the karlene. The karolina carol the neel. The karolina abuse the karlene. The karolina abuse the neel. If someone is folksy and they see the karolina then the karolina does not see the neel. If someone is autonomous and not philistine then they do not see the karolina. If someone abuse the neel then they do not eat the karolina. If someone unitize the neel and they do not eat the karolina then the neel abuse the karlene. If someone abuse the karlene then the karlene abuse the karolina. If someone unitize the neel and the neel abuse the karlene then they see the karlene. The karolina is not autonomous.", "logic": "\nFolksy(karlene)\nCarol(karlene, neel)\nUnitize(neel, karolina)\nnot Undried(neel)\nRotary(neel)\nCarol(neel, karlene)\nnot Carol(neel, karolina)\nAbuse(neel, karolina)\nUnitize(karolina, neel)\nAutonomous(karolina)\nUndried(karolina)\nCarol(karolina, karlene)\nCarol(karolina, neel)\nAbuse(karolina, karlene)\nAbuse(karolina, neel)\nforall x (Folksy(x) and Carol(x, karolina) -> not Carol(karolina, neel))\nforall x (Autonomous(x) and not Philistine(x) -> not Carol(x, karolina))\nforall x (Abuse(x, neel) -> not Unitize(x, karolina))\nforall x (Unitize(x, neel) and not Unitize(x, karolina) -> Abuse(neel, karlene))\nforall x (Abuse(x, karlene) -> Abuse(karlene, karolina))\nforall x (Unitize(x, neel) and Abuse(neel, karlene) -> Carol(x, karlene))\n\nnot Autonomous(karolina)\n\ntherefore Autonomous(karolina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The ophelia is carbonylic. The ophelia title the marybelle. The marybelle brain the jerome. The marybelle is not alveolate. The marybelle is senecan. The marybelle title the ophelia. The marybelle does not see the jerome. The marybelle amplify the jerome. The jerome brain the marybelle. The jerome is glace. The jerome is alveolate. The jerome title the ophelia. The jerome title the marybelle. The jerome amplify the ophelia. The jerome amplify the marybelle. If someone is carbonylic and they see the jerome then the jerome does not see the marybelle. If someone is glace and not burnished then they do not see the jerome. If someone amplify the marybelle then they do not eat the jerome. If someone brain the marybelle and they do not eat the jerome then the marybelle amplify the ophelia. If someone amplify the ophelia then the ophelia amplify the jerome. If someone brain the marybelle and the marybelle amplify the ophelia then they see the ophelia. The jerome does not eat the jerome.", "logic": "\nCarbonylic(ophelia)\nTitle(ophelia, marybelle)\nBrain(marybelle, jerome)\nnot Alveolate(marybelle)\nSenecan(marybelle)\nTitle(marybelle, ophelia)\nnot Title(marybelle, jerome)\nAmplify(marybelle, jerome)\nBrain(jerome, marybelle)\nGlace(jerome)\nAlveolate(jerome)\nTitle(jerome, ophelia)\nTitle(jerome, marybelle)\nAmplify(jerome, ophelia)\nAmplify(jerome, marybelle)\nforall x (Carbonylic(x) and Title(x, jerome) -> not Title(jerome, marybelle))\nforall x (Glace(x) and not Burnished(x) -> not Title(x, jerome))\nforall x (Amplify(x, marybelle) -> not Brain(x, jerome))\nforall x (Brain(x, marybelle) and not Brain(x, jerome) -> Amplify(marybelle, ophelia))\nforall x (Amplify(x, ophelia) -> Amplify(ophelia, jerome))\nforall x (Brain(x, marybelle) and Amplify(marybelle, ophelia) -> Title(x, ophelia))\n\nnot Brain(jerome, jerome)\n\nAmplify(jerome, marybelle) and forall x (Amplify(x, marybelle) -> not Brain(x, jerome)) -> therefore not Brain(jerome, jerome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The matthiew is deserted. The matthiew naturalize the patrizia. The patrizia adjudicate the lona. The patrizia is not prussian. The patrizia is drupaceous. The patrizia naturalize the matthiew. The patrizia does not see the lona. The patrizia revive the lona. The lona adjudicate the patrizia. The lona is degraded. The lona is prussian. The lona naturalize the matthiew. The lona naturalize the patrizia. The lona revive the matthiew. The lona revive the patrizia. If someone is deserted and they see the lona then the lona does not see the patrizia. If someone is degraded and not chivalric then they do not see the lona. If someone revive the patrizia then they do not eat the lona. If someone adjudicate the patrizia and they do not eat the lona then the patrizia revive the matthiew. If someone revive the matthiew then the matthiew revive the lona. If someone adjudicate the patrizia and the patrizia revive the matthiew then they see the matthiew. The matthiew does not visit the lona.", "logic": "\nDeserted(matthiew)\nNaturalize(matthiew, patrizia)\nAdjudicate(patrizia, lona)\nnot Prussian(patrizia)\nDrupaceous(patrizia)\nNaturalize(patrizia, matthiew)\nnot Naturalize(patrizia, lona)\nRevive(patrizia, lona)\nAdjudicate(lona, patrizia)\nDegraded(lona)\nPrussian(lona)\nNaturalize(lona, matthiew)\nNaturalize(lona, patrizia)\nRevive(lona, matthiew)\nRevive(lona, patrizia)\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Naturalize(x, lona) -> not Naturalize(lona, patrizia))\nforall x (Degraded(x) and not Chivalric(x) -> not Naturalize(x, lona))\nforall x (Revive(x, patrizia) -> not Adjudicate(x, lona))\nforall x (Adjudicate(x, patrizia) and not Adjudicate(x, lona) -> Revive(patrizia, matthiew))\nforall x (Revive(x, matthiew) -> Revive(matthiew, lona))\nforall x (Adjudicate(x, patrizia) and Revive(patrizia, matthiew) -> Naturalize(x, matthiew))\n\nnot Revive(matthiew, lona)\n\nRevive(lona, matthiew) and forall x (Revive(x, matthiew) -> Revive(matthiew, lona)) -> therefore Revive(matthiew, lona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The diahann is satanic. The diahann chuff the schroeder. The schroeder undress the marve. The schroeder is not brasslike. The schroeder is strangled. The schroeder chuff the diahann. The schroeder does not see the marve. The schroeder teargas the marve. The marve undress the schroeder. The marve is brainish. The marve is brasslike. The marve chuff the diahann. The marve chuff the schroeder. The marve teargas the diahann. The marve teargas the schroeder. If someone is satanic and they see the marve then the marve does not see the schroeder. If someone is brainish and not remaining then they do not see the marve. If someone teargas the schroeder then they do not eat the marve. If someone undress the schroeder and they do not eat the marve then the schroeder teargas the diahann. If someone teargas the diahann then the diahann teargas the marve. If someone undress the schroeder and the schroeder teargas the diahann then they see the diahann. The schroeder teargas the diahann.", "logic": "\nSatanic(diahann)\nChuff(diahann, schroeder)\nUndress(schroeder, marve)\nnot Brasslike(schroeder)\nStrangled(schroeder)\nChuff(schroeder, diahann)\nnot Chuff(schroeder, marve)\nTeargas(schroeder, marve)\nUndress(marve, schroeder)\nBrainish(marve)\nBrasslike(marve)\nChuff(marve, diahann)\nChuff(marve, schroeder)\nTeargas(marve, diahann)\nTeargas(marve, schroeder)\nforall x (Satanic(x) and Chuff(x, marve) -> not Chuff(marve, schroeder))\nforall x (Brainish(x) and not Remaining(x) -> not Chuff(x, marve))\nforall x (Teargas(x, schroeder) -> not Undress(x, marve))\nforall x (Undress(x, schroeder) and not Undress(x, marve) -> Teargas(schroeder, diahann))\nforall x (Teargas(x, diahann) -> Teargas(diahann, marve))\nforall x (Undress(x, schroeder) and Teargas(schroeder, diahann) -> Chuff(x, diahann))\n\nTeargas(schroeder, diahann)\n\nTeargas(marve, schroeder) and forall x (Teargas(x, schroeder) -> not Undress(x, marve)) -> therefore not Undress(marve, marve) Undress(marve, schroeder) and not Undress(marve, marve) and forall x (Undress(x, schroeder) and not Undress(x, marve) -> Teargas(schroeder, diahann)) -> therefore Teargas(schroeder, diahann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The correy is adipose. The correy peep the shumeet. The shumeet modernize the illa. The shumeet is not undismayed. The shumeet is shrivelled. The shumeet peep the correy. The shumeet does not see the illa. The shumeet attack the illa. The illa modernize the shumeet. The illa is sensitive. The illa is undismayed. The illa peep the correy. The illa peep the shumeet. The illa attack the correy. The illa attack the shumeet. If someone is adipose and they see the illa then the illa does not see the shumeet. If someone is sensitive and not overloaded then they do not see the illa. If someone attack the shumeet then they do not eat the illa. If someone modernize the shumeet and they do not eat the illa then the shumeet attack the correy. If someone attack the correy then the correy attack the illa. If someone modernize the shumeet and the shumeet attack the correy then they see the correy. The shumeet does not visit the correy.", "logic": "\nAdipose(correy)\nPeep(correy, shumeet)\nModernize(shumeet, illa)\nnot Undismayed(shumeet)\nShrivelled(shumeet)\nPeep(shumeet, correy)\nnot Peep(shumeet, illa)\nAttack(shumeet, illa)\nModernize(illa, shumeet)\nSensitive(illa)\nUndismayed(illa)\nPeep(illa, correy)\nPeep(illa, shumeet)\nAttack(illa, correy)\nAttack(illa, shumeet)\nforall x (Adipose(x) and Peep(x, illa) -> not Peep(illa, shumeet))\nforall x (Sensitive(x) and not Overloaded(x) -> not Peep(x, illa))\nforall x (Attack(x, shumeet) -> not Modernize(x, illa))\nforall x (Modernize(x, shumeet) and not Modernize(x, illa) -> Attack(shumeet, correy))\nforall x (Attack(x, correy) -> Attack(correy, illa))\nforall x (Modernize(x, shumeet) and Attack(shumeet, correy) -> Peep(x, correy))\n\nnot Attack(shumeet, correy)\n\nAttack(illa, shumeet) and forall x (Attack(x, shumeet) -> not Modernize(x, illa)) -> therefore not Modernize(illa, illa) Modernize(illa, shumeet) and not Modernize(illa, illa) and forall x (Modernize(x, shumeet) and not Modernize(x, illa) -> Attack(shumeet, correy)) -> therefore Attack(shumeet, correy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The jany is ravaging. The jany dodder the arlyn. The arlyn conk the hillery. The arlyn is not tubelike. The arlyn is inodorous. The arlyn dodder the jany. The arlyn does not see the hillery. The arlyn anatomise the hillery. The hillery conk the arlyn. The hillery is blockish. The hillery is tubelike. The hillery dodder the jany. The hillery dodder the arlyn. The hillery anatomise the jany. The hillery anatomise the arlyn. If someone is ravaging and they see the hillery then the hillery does not see the arlyn. If someone is blockish and not showy then they do not see the hillery. If someone anatomise the arlyn then they do not eat the hillery. If someone conk the arlyn and they do not eat the hillery then the arlyn anatomise the jany. If someone anatomise the jany then the jany anatomise the hillery. If someone conk the arlyn and the arlyn anatomise the jany then they see the jany. The jany does not see the jany.", "logic": "\nRavaging(jany)\nDodder(jany, arlyn)\nConk(arlyn, hillery)\nnot Tubelike(arlyn)\nInodorous(arlyn)\nDodder(arlyn, jany)\nnot Dodder(arlyn, hillery)\nAnatomise(arlyn, hillery)\nConk(hillery, arlyn)\nBlockish(hillery)\nTubelike(hillery)\nDodder(hillery, jany)\nDodder(hillery, arlyn)\nAnatomise(hillery, jany)\nAnatomise(hillery, arlyn)\nforall x (Ravaging(x) and Dodder(x, hillery) -> not Dodder(hillery, arlyn))\nforall x (Blockish(x) and not Showy(x) -> not Dodder(x, hillery))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, arlyn) -> not Conk(x, hillery))\nforall x (Conk(x, arlyn) and not Conk(x, hillery) -> Anatomise(arlyn, jany))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, jany) -> Anatomise(jany, hillery))\nforall x (Conk(x, arlyn) and Anatomise(arlyn, jany) -> Dodder(x, jany))\n\nnot Dodder(jany, jany)\n\nforall x (Conk(x, arlyn) and Anatomise(arlyn, jany) -> Dodder(x, jany)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The ainsley is odious. The ainsley enliven the carry. The carry antic the lynde. The carry is not semihard. The carry is faultless. The carry enliven the ainsley. The carry does not see the lynde. The carry gibber the lynde. The lynde antic the carry. The lynde is localised. The lynde is semihard. The lynde enliven the ainsley. The lynde enliven the carry. The lynde gibber the ainsley. The lynde gibber the carry. If someone is odious and they see the lynde then the lynde does not see the carry. If someone is localised and not arguable then they do not see the lynde. If someone gibber the carry then they do not eat the lynde. If someone antic the carry and they do not eat the lynde then the carry gibber the ainsley. If someone gibber the ainsley then the ainsley gibber the lynde. If someone antic the carry and the carry gibber the ainsley then they see the ainsley. The carry enliven the carry.", "logic": "\nOdious(ainsley)\nEnliven(ainsley, carry)\nAntic(carry, lynde)\nnot Semihard(carry)\nFaultless(carry)\nEnliven(carry, ainsley)\nnot Enliven(carry, lynde)\nGibber(carry, lynde)\nAntic(lynde, carry)\nLocalised(lynde)\nSemihard(lynde)\nEnliven(lynde, ainsley)\nEnliven(lynde, carry)\nGibber(lynde, ainsley)\nGibber(lynde, carry)\nforall x (Odious(x) and Enliven(x, lynde) -> not Enliven(lynde, carry))\nforall x (Localised(x) and not Arguable(x) -> not Enliven(x, lynde))\nforall x (Gibber(x, carry) -> not Antic(x, lynde))\nforall x (Antic(x, carry) and not Antic(x, lynde) -> Gibber(carry, ainsley))\nforall x (Gibber(x, ainsley) -> Gibber(ainsley, lynde))\nforall x (Antic(x, carry) and Gibber(carry, ainsley) -> Enliven(x, ainsley))\n\nEnliven(carry, carry)\n\nEnliven(carry, carry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The laureen is dexter. The laureen shanghai the morgana. The morgana devitalise the aleda. The morgana is not municipal. The morgana is jiggered. The morgana shanghai the laureen. The morgana does not see the aleda. The morgana strut the aleda. The aleda devitalise the morgana. The aleda is voluptuous. The aleda is municipal. The aleda shanghai the laureen. The aleda shanghai the morgana. The aleda strut the laureen. The aleda strut the morgana. If someone is dexter and they see the aleda then the aleda does not see the morgana. If someone is voluptuous and not unhatched then they do not see the aleda. If someone strut the morgana then they do not eat the aleda. If someone devitalise the morgana and they do not eat the aleda then the morgana strut the laureen. If someone strut the laureen then the laureen strut the aleda. If someone devitalise the morgana and the morgana strut the laureen then they see the laureen. The aleda is not jiggered.", "logic": "\nDexter(laureen)\nShanghai(laureen, morgana)\nDevitalise(morgana, aleda)\nnot Municipal(morgana)\nJiggered(morgana)\nShanghai(morgana, laureen)\nnot Shanghai(morgana, aleda)\nStrut(morgana, aleda)\nDevitalise(aleda, morgana)\nVoluptuous(aleda)\nMunicipal(aleda)\nShanghai(aleda, laureen)\nShanghai(aleda, morgana)\nStrut(aleda, laureen)\nStrut(aleda, morgana)\nforall x (Dexter(x) and Shanghai(x, aleda) -> not Shanghai(aleda, morgana))\nforall x (Voluptuous(x) and not Unhatched(x) -> not Shanghai(x, aleda))\nforall x (Strut(x, morgana) -> not Devitalise(x, aleda))\nforall x (Devitalise(x, morgana) and not Devitalise(x, aleda) -> Strut(morgana, laureen))\nforall x (Strut(x, laureen) -> Strut(laureen, aleda))\nforall x (Devitalise(x, morgana) and Strut(morgana, laureen) -> Shanghai(x, laureen))\n\nnot Jiggered(aleda)\n\nnot Jiggered(aleda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The eva is saxicolous. The eva alkalise the chere. The chere pilot the steffi. The chere is not dainty. The chere is neolithic. The chere alkalise the eva. The chere does not see the steffi. The chere oxidize the steffi. The steffi pilot the chere. The steffi is subarctic. The steffi is dainty. The steffi alkalise the eva. The steffi alkalise the chere. The steffi oxidize the eva. The steffi oxidize the chere. If someone is saxicolous and they see the steffi then the steffi does not see the chere. If someone is subarctic and not iniquitous then they do not see the steffi. If someone oxidize the chere then they do not eat the steffi. If someone pilot the chere and they do not eat the steffi then the chere oxidize the eva. If someone oxidize the eva then the eva oxidize the steffi. If someone pilot the chere and the chere oxidize the eva then they see the eva. The eva alkalise the steffi.", "logic": "\nSaxicolous(eva)\nAlkalise(eva, chere)\nPilot(chere, steffi)\nnot Dainty(chere)\nNeolithic(chere)\nAlkalise(chere, eva)\nnot Alkalise(chere, steffi)\nOxidize(chere, steffi)\nPilot(steffi, chere)\nSubarctic(steffi)\nDainty(steffi)\nAlkalise(steffi, eva)\nAlkalise(steffi, chere)\nOxidize(steffi, eva)\nOxidize(steffi, chere)\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Alkalise(x, steffi) -> not Alkalise(steffi, chere))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and not Iniquitous(x) -> not Alkalise(x, steffi))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, chere) -> not Pilot(x, steffi))\nforall x (Pilot(x, chere) and not Pilot(x, steffi) -> Oxidize(chere, eva))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, eva) -> Oxidize(eva, steffi))\nforall x (Pilot(x, chere) and Oxidize(chere, eva) -> Alkalise(x, eva))\n\nAlkalise(eva, steffi)\n\nAlkalise(eva, steffi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The sisely is encyclical. The sisely assoil the matthiew. The matthiew thin the misha. The matthiew is not sneering. The matthiew is aeronautic. The matthiew assoil the sisely. The matthiew does not see the misha. The matthiew avulse the misha. The misha thin the matthiew. The misha is seasick. The misha is sneering. The misha assoil the sisely. The misha assoil the matthiew. The misha avulse the sisely. The misha avulse the matthiew. If someone is encyclical and they see the misha then the misha does not see the matthiew. If someone is seasick and not mercurial then they do not see the misha. If someone avulse the matthiew then they do not eat the misha. If someone thin the matthiew and they do not eat the misha then the matthiew avulse the sisely. If someone avulse the sisely then the sisely avulse the misha. If someone thin the matthiew and the matthiew avulse the sisely then they see the sisely. The sisely does not visit the matthiew.", "logic": "\nEncyclical(sisely)\nAssoil(sisely, matthiew)\nThin(matthiew, misha)\nnot Sneering(matthiew)\nAeronautic(matthiew)\nAssoil(matthiew, sisely)\nnot Assoil(matthiew, misha)\nAvulse(matthiew, misha)\nThin(misha, matthiew)\nSeasick(misha)\nSneering(misha)\nAssoil(misha, sisely)\nAssoil(misha, matthiew)\nAvulse(misha, sisely)\nAvulse(misha, matthiew)\nforall x (Encyclical(x) and Assoil(x, misha) -> not Assoil(misha, matthiew))\nforall x (Seasick(x) and not Mercurial(x) -> not Assoil(x, misha))\nforall x (Avulse(x, matthiew) -> not Thin(x, misha))\nforall x (Thin(x, matthiew) and not Thin(x, misha) -> Avulse(matthiew, sisely))\nforall x (Avulse(x, sisely) -> Avulse(sisely, misha))\nforall x (Thin(x, matthiew) and Avulse(matthiew, sisely) -> Assoil(x, sisely))\n\nnot Avulse(sisely, matthiew)\n\nnot Avulse(sisely, matthiew) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "The fonz is toothlike. The fonz ovenbake the aeriela. The aeriela conjure the morna. The aeriela is not umteenth. The aeriela is respondent. The aeriela ovenbake the fonz. The aeriela does not see the morna. The aeriela encamp the morna. The morna conjure the aeriela. The morna is rumansh. The morna is umteenth. The morna ovenbake the fonz. The morna ovenbake the aeriela. The morna encamp the fonz. The morna encamp the aeriela. If someone is toothlike and they see the morna then the morna does not see the aeriela. If someone is rumansh and not emulous then they do not see the morna. If someone encamp the aeriela then they do not eat the morna. If someone conjure the aeriela and they do not eat the morna then the aeriela encamp the fonz. If someone encamp the fonz then the fonz encamp the morna. If someone conjure the aeriela and the aeriela encamp the fonz then they see the fonz. The fonz is rumansh.", "logic": "\nToothlike(fonz)\nOvenbake(fonz, aeriela)\nConjure(aeriela, morna)\nnot Umteenth(aeriela)\nRespondent(aeriela)\nOvenbake(aeriela, fonz)\nnot Ovenbake(aeriela, morna)\nEncamp(aeriela, morna)\nConjure(morna, aeriela)\nRumansh(morna)\nUmteenth(morna)\nOvenbake(morna, fonz)\nOvenbake(morna, aeriela)\nEncamp(morna, fonz)\nEncamp(morna, aeriela)\nforall x (Toothlike(x) and Ovenbake(x, morna) -> not Ovenbake(morna, aeriela))\nforall x (Rumansh(x) and not Emulous(x) -> not Ovenbake(x, morna))\nforall x (Encamp(x, aeriela) -> not Conjure(x, morna))\nforall x (Conjure(x, aeriela) and not Conjure(x, morna) -> Encamp(aeriela, fonz))\nforall x (Encamp(x, fonz) -> Encamp(fonz, morna))\nforall x (Conjure(x, aeriela) and Encamp(aeriela, fonz) -> Ovenbake(x, fonz))\n\nRumansh(fonz)\n\nRumansh(fonz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-287"} {"premises": "Zane is faecal. Zane is superior. Zane is suave. Zane is advisory. Neile is faecal. Neile is superior. Neile is external. Neile is bracteal. Neile is suave. Neile is advisory. If someone is faecal and bracteal then they are unfunny. Red people are faecal. Rough, superior people are bracteal. Neile is suave.", "logic": "\nFaecal(zane)\nSuperior(zane)\nSuave(zane)\nAdvisory(zane)\nFaecal(neile)\nSuperior(neile)\nExternal(neile)\nBracteal(neile)\nSuave(neile)\nAdvisory(neile)\nforall x (Faecal(x) and Bracteal(x) -> Unfunny(x))\nforall x (Bracteal(x) -> Faecal(x))\nforall x (Suave(x) and Superior(x) -> Bracteal(x))\n\nSuave(neile)\n\ntherefore Suave(neile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Timmi is duodecimal. Timmi is musical. Timmi is amenable. Timmi is spooky. Roxy is duodecimal. Roxy is musical. Roxy is fashioned. Roxy is abnaki. Roxy is amenable. Roxy is spooky. If someone is duodecimal and abnaki then they are continuing. Red people are duodecimal. Rough, musical people are abnaki. Roxy is not musical.", "logic": "\nDuodecimal(timmi)\nMusical(timmi)\nAmenable(timmi)\nSpooky(timmi)\nDuodecimal(roxy)\nMusical(roxy)\nFashioned(roxy)\nAbnaki(roxy)\nAmenable(roxy)\nSpooky(roxy)\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) and Abnaki(x) -> Continuing(x))\nforall x (Abnaki(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) and Musical(x) -> Abnaki(x))\n\nnot Musical(roxy)\n\ntherefore Musical(roxy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Dollie is ambitious. Dollie is prenominal. Dollie is congealed. Dollie is sunken. Pen is ambitious. Pen is prenominal. Pen is perverse. Pen is prostatic. Pen is congealed. Pen is sunken. If someone is ambitious and prostatic then they are tunisian. Red people are ambitious. Rough, prenominal people are prostatic. Dollie is prostatic.", "logic": "\nAmbitious(dollie)\nPrenominal(dollie)\nCongealed(dollie)\nSunken(dollie)\nAmbitious(pen)\nPrenominal(pen)\nPerverse(pen)\nProstatic(pen)\nCongealed(pen)\nSunken(pen)\nforall x (Ambitious(x) and Prostatic(x) -> Tunisian(x))\nforall x (Prostatic(x) -> Ambitious(x))\nforall x (Congealed(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Prostatic(x))\n\nProstatic(dollie)\n\nCongealed(dollie) and Prenominal(dollie) and forall x (Congealed(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Prostatic(x)) -> therefore Prostatic(dollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Traci is pencilled. Traci is iterative. Traci is delayed. Traci is dull. Whit is pencilled. Whit is iterative. Whit is calendric. Whit is lowland. Whit is delayed. Whit is dull. If someone is pencilled and lowland then they are forked. Red people are pencilled. Rough, iterative people are lowland. Whit is not forked.", "logic": "\nPencilled(traci)\nIterative(traci)\nDelayed(traci)\nDull(traci)\nPencilled(whit)\nIterative(whit)\nCalendric(whit)\nLowland(whit)\nDelayed(whit)\nDull(whit)\nforall x (Pencilled(x) and Lowland(x) -> Forked(x))\nforall x (Lowland(x) -> Pencilled(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) and Iterative(x) -> Lowland(x))\n\nnot Forked(whit)\n\nPencilled(whit) and Lowland(whit) and forall x (Pencilled(x) and Lowland(x) -> Forked(x)) -> therefore Forked(whit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Tilda is whirring. Tilda is cubist. Tilda is glassless. Tilda is inflatable. Morton is whirring. Morton is cubist. Morton is separative. Morton is outspoken. Morton is glassless. Morton is inflatable. If someone is whirring and outspoken then they are wooly. Red people are whirring. Rough, cubist people are outspoken. Tilda is wooly.", "logic": "\nWhirring(tilda)\nCubist(tilda)\nGlassless(tilda)\nInflatable(tilda)\nWhirring(morton)\nCubist(morton)\nSeparative(morton)\nOutspoken(morton)\nGlassless(morton)\nInflatable(morton)\nforall x (Whirring(x) and Outspoken(x) -> Wooly(x))\nforall x (Outspoken(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Glassless(x) and Cubist(x) -> Outspoken(x))\n\nWooly(tilda)\n\nGlassless(tilda) and Cubist(tilda) and forall x (Glassless(x) and Cubist(x) -> Outspoken(x)) -> therefore Outspoken(tilda) Whirring(tilda) and Outspoken(tilda) and forall x (Whirring(x) and Outspoken(x) -> Wooly(x)) -> therefore Wooly(tilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Immanuel is jittery. Immanuel is archival. Immanuel is assuming. Immanuel is chadian. Marline is jittery. Marline is archival. Marline is tameable. Marline is deweyan. Marline is assuming. Marline is chadian. If someone is jittery and deweyan then they are annelidan. Red people are jittery. Rough, archival people are deweyan. Immanuel is not annelidan.", "logic": "\nJittery(immanuel)\nArchival(immanuel)\nAssuming(immanuel)\nChadian(immanuel)\nJittery(marline)\nArchival(marline)\nTameable(marline)\nDeweyan(marline)\nAssuming(marline)\nChadian(marline)\nforall x (Jittery(x) and Deweyan(x) -> Annelidan(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Jittery(x))\nforall x (Assuming(x) and Archival(x) -> Deweyan(x))\n\nnot Annelidan(immanuel)\n\nAssuming(immanuel) and Archival(immanuel) and forall x (Assuming(x) and Archival(x) -> Deweyan(x)) -> therefore Deweyan(immanuel) Jittery(immanuel) and Deweyan(immanuel) and forall x (Jittery(x) and Deweyan(x) -> Annelidan(x)) -> therefore Annelidan(immanuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "The thorny crib the pierson. The thorny sight the pierson. The pierson crib the thorny. If the pierson sight the thorny then the thorny pulverize the pierson. If something is mercurial then it sight the thorny. If something sight the pierson then the pierson sight the thorny. The thorny crib the pierson.", "logic": "\nCrib(thorny, pierson)\nSight(thorny, pierson)\nCrib(pierson, thorny)\nSight(pierson, thorny) -> Pulverize(thorny, pierson)\nforall x (Mercurial(x) -> Sight(x, thorny))\nforall x (Sight(x, pierson) -> Sight(pierson, thorny))\n\nCrib(thorny, pierson)\n\ntherefore Crib(thorny, pierson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The marcille backstroke the jennings. The marcille abreact the jennings. The jennings backstroke the marcille. If the jennings abreact the marcille then the marcille pack the jennings. If something is oviparous then it abreact the marcille. If something abreact the jennings then the jennings abreact the marcille. The marcille does not need the jennings.", "logic": "\nBackstroke(marcille, jennings)\nAbreact(marcille, jennings)\nBackstroke(jennings, marcille)\nAbreact(jennings, marcille) -> Pack(marcille, jennings)\nforall x (Oviparous(x) -> Abreact(x, marcille))\nforall x (Abreact(x, jennings) -> Abreact(jennings, marcille))\n\nnot Abreact(marcille, jennings)\n\ntherefore Abreact(marcille, jennings)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The derek disorder the roseline. The derek commend the roseline. The roseline disorder the derek. If the roseline commend the derek then the derek harass the roseline. If something is ashen then it commend the derek. If something commend the roseline then the roseline commend the derek. The roseline commend the derek.", "logic": "\nDisorder(derek, roseline)\nCommend(derek, roseline)\nDisorder(roseline, derek)\nCommend(roseline, derek) -> Harass(derek, roseline)\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> Commend(x, derek))\nforall x (Commend(x, roseline) -> Commend(roseline, derek))\n\nCommend(roseline, derek)\n\nCommend(derek, roseline) and forall x (Commend(x, roseline) -> Commend(roseline, derek)) -> therefore Commend(roseline, derek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The teodoro catabolize the josselyn. The teodoro surfboard the josselyn. The josselyn catabolize the teodoro. If the josselyn surfboard the teodoro then the teodoro quail the josselyn. If something is sombre then it surfboard the teodoro. If something surfboard the josselyn then the josselyn surfboard the teodoro. The josselyn does not need the teodoro.", "logic": "\nCatabolize(teodoro, josselyn)\nSurfboard(teodoro, josselyn)\nCatabolize(josselyn, teodoro)\nSurfboard(josselyn, teodoro) -> Quail(teodoro, josselyn)\nforall x (Sombre(x) -> Surfboard(x, teodoro))\nforall x (Surfboard(x, josselyn) -> Surfboard(josselyn, teodoro))\n\nnot Surfboard(josselyn, teodoro)\n\nSurfboard(teodoro, josselyn) and forall x (Surfboard(x, josselyn) -> Surfboard(josselyn, teodoro)) -> therefore Surfboard(josselyn, teodoro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The lezlie quaver the jasper. The lezlie blindfold the jasper. The jasper quaver the lezlie. If the jasper blindfold the lezlie then the lezlie divest the jasper. If something is outmost then it blindfold the lezlie. If something blindfold the jasper then the jasper blindfold the lezlie. The lezlie divest the jasper.", "logic": "\nQuaver(lezlie, jasper)\nBlindfold(lezlie, jasper)\nQuaver(jasper, lezlie)\nBlindfold(jasper, lezlie) -> Divest(lezlie, jasper)\nforall x (Outmost(x) -> Blindfold(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Blindfold(x, jasper) -> Blindfold(jasper, lezlie))\n\nDivest(lezlie, jasper)\n\nBlindfold(lezlie, jasper) and forall x (Blindfold(x, jasper) -> Blindfold(jasper, lezlie)) -> therefore Blindfold(jasper, lezlie) Blindfold(jasper, lezlie) and Blindfold(jasper, lezlie) -> Divest(lezlie, jasper) -> therefore Divest(lezlie, jasper)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The marigold symphonize the allen. The marigold declaim the allen. The allen symphonize the marigold. If the allen declaim the marigold then the marigold incense the allen. If something is sallow then it declaim the marigold. If something declaim the allen then the allen declaim the marigold. The marigold does not chase the allen.", "logic": "\nSymphonize(marigold, allen)\nDeclaim(marigold, allen)\nSymphonize(allen, marigold)\nDeclaim(allen, marigold) -> Incense(marigold, allen)\nforall x (Sallow(x) -> Declaim(x, marigold))\nforall x (Declaim(x, allen) -> Declaim(allen, marigold))\n\nnot Incense(marigold, allen)\n\nDeclaim(marigold, allen) and forall x (Declaim(x, allen) -> Declaim(allen, marigold)) -> therefore Declaim(allen, marigold) Declaim(allen, marigold) and Declaim(allen, marigold) -> Incense(marigold, allen) -> therefore Incense(marigold, allen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The brianna unionise the nicol. The brianna emaciate the nicol. The nicol unionise the brianna. If the nicol emaciate the brianna then the brianna adduct the nicol. If something is camphoric then it emaciate the brianna. If something emaciate the nicol then the nicol emaciate the brianna. The brianna does not need the brianna.", "logic": "\nUnionise(brianna, nicol)\nEmaciate(brianna, nicol)\nUnionise(nicol, brianna)\nEmaciate(nicol, brianna) -> Adduct(brianna, nicol)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Emaciate(x, brianna))\nforall x (Emaciate(x, nicol) -> Emaciate(nicol, brianna))\n\nnot Emaciate(brianna, brianna)\n\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Emaciate(x, brianna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The libby overmaster the laurance. The libby harshen the laurance. The laurance overmaster the libby. If the laurance harshen the libby then the libby ruffle the laurance. If something is senescent then it harshen the libby. If something harshen the laurance then the laurance harshen the libby. The laurance is blue.", "logic": "\nOvermaster(libby, laurance)\nHarshen(libby, laurance)\nOvermaster(laurance, libby)\nHarshen(laurance, libby) -> Ruffle(libby, laurance)\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> Harshen(x, libby))\nforall x (Harshen(x, laurance) -> Harshen(laurance, libby))\n\nBlue(laurance)\n\nBlue(laurance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The allie cartoon the dorthy. The allie lift the dorthy. The dorthy cartoon the allie. If the dorthy lift the allie then the allie ionize the dorthy. If something is whispered then it lift the allie. If something lift the dorthy then the dorthy lift the allie. The dorthy is not cold.", "logic": "\nCartoon(allie, dorthy)\nLift(allie, dorthy)\nCartoon(dorthy, allie)\nLift(dorthy, allie) -> Ionize(allie, dorthy)\nforall x (Whispered(x) -> Lift(x, allie))\nforall x (Lift(x, dorthy) -> Lift(dorthy, allie))\n\nnot Cold(dorthy)\n\nnot Cold(dorthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The marlie scold the sayres. The marlie overlie the sayres. The sayres scold the marlie. If the sayres overlie the marlie then the marlie outflank the sayres. If something is deistic then it overlie the marlie. If something overlie the sayres then the sayres overlie the marlie. The sayres is rough.", "logic": "\nScold(marlie, sayres)\nOverlie(marlie, sayres)\nScold(sayres, marlie)\nOverlie(sayres, marlie) -> Outflank(marlie, sayres)\nforall x (Deistic(x) -> Overlie(x, marlie))\nforall x (Overlie(x, sayres) -> Overlie(sayres, marlie))\n\nRough(sayres)\n\nRough(sayres) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The raina foreordain the gabrielle. The raina galvanize the gabrielle. The gabrielle foreordain the raina. If the gabrielle galvanize the raina then the raina rumour the gabrielle. If something is blond then it galvanize the raina. If something galvanize the gabrielle then the gabrielle galvanize the raina. The raina does not chase the raina.", "logic": "\nForeordain(raina, gabrielle)\nGalvanize(raina, gabrielle)\nForeordain(gabrielle, raina)\nGalvanize(gabrielle, raina) -> Rumour(raina, gabrielle)\nforall x (Blond(x) -> Galvanize(x, raina))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, gabrielle) -> Galvanize(gabrielle, raina))\n\nnot Rumour(raina, raina)\n\nnot Rumour(raina, raina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The jenda whitewash the carrissa. The jenda harness the carrissa. The carrissa whitewash the jenda. If the carrissa harness the jenda then the jenda canker the carrissa. If something is acapnic then it harness the jenda. If something harness the carrissa then the carrissa harness the jenda. The carrissa harness the carrissa.", "logic": "\nWhitewash(jenda, carrissa)\nHarness(jenda, carrissa)\nWhitewash(carrissa, jenda)\nHarness(carrissa, jenda) -> Canker(jenda, carrissa)\nforall x (Acapnic(x) -> Harness(x, jenda))\nforall x (Harness(x, carrissa) -> Harness(carrissa, jenda))\n\nHarness(carrissa, carrissa)\n\nHarness(carrissa, carrissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "Harland is maximizing. Harland is pathogenic. Harland is odorless. Yvonne is maximizing. Niccolo is felicitous. Niccolo is scurrilous. Niccolo is tame. Thad is unprepared. Thad is felicitous. Thad is scurrilous. Thad is odorless. Thad is tame. If someone is tame and felicitous then they are pathogenic. If someone is tame then they are unprepared. Big, odorless people are pathogenic. If someone is tame and pathogenic then they are odorless. Nice people are tame. If someone is maximizing and tame then they are felicitous. Blue people are scurrilous. Blue people are tame. Thad is scurrilous.", "logic": "\nMaximizing(harland)\nPathogenic(harland)\nOdorless(harland)\nMaximizing(yvonne)\nFelicitous(niccolo)\nScurrilous(niccolo)\nTame(niccolo)\nUnprepared(thad)\nFelicitous(thad)\nScurrilous(thad)\nOdorless(thad)\nTame(thad)\nforall x (Tame(x) and Felicitous(x) -> Pathogenic(x))\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) and Odorless(x) -> Pathogenic(x))\nforall x (Tame(x) and Pathogenic(x) -> Odorless(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) -> Tame(x))\nforall x (Maximizing(x) and Tame(x) -> Felicitous(x))\nforall x (Felicitous(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Felicitous(x) -> Tame(x))\n\nScurrilous(thad)\n\ntherefore Scurrilous(thad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Zoe is bluff. Zoe is geriatric. Zoe is spectacled. Kylila is bluff. Vivianne is hinder. Vivianne is pierced. Vivianne is plucked. Arlee is glistening. Arlee is hinder. Arlee is pierced. Arlee is spectacled. Arlee is plucked. If someone is plucked and hinder then they are geriatric. If someone is plucked then they are glistening. Big, spectacled people are geriatric. If someone is plucked and geriatric then they are spectacled. Nice people are plucked. If someone is bluff and plucked then they are hinder. Blue people are pierced. Blue people are plucked. Vivianne is not pierced.", "logic": "\nBluff(zoe)\nGeriatric(zoe)\nSpectacled(zoe)\nBluff(kylila)\nHinder(vivianne)\nPierced(vivianne)\nPlucked(vivianne)\nGlistening(arlee)\nHinder(arlee)\nPierced(arlee)\nSpectacled(arlee)\nPlucked(arlee)\nforall x (Plucked(x) and Hinder(x) -> Geriatric(x))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Glistening(x))\nforall x (Glistening(x) and Spectacled(x) -> Geriatric(x))\nforall x (Plucked(x) and Geriatric(x) -> Spectacled(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Plucked(x))\nforall x (Bluff(x) and Plucked(x) -> Hinder(x))\nforall x (Hinder(x) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Hinder(x) -> Plucked(x))\n\nnot Pierced(vivianne)\n\ntherefore Pierced(vivianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Vivi is partible. Vivi is unsugared. Vivi is crowning. Valaree is partible. Alton is touching. Alton is articulary. Alton is simplified. Averell is incendiary. Averell is touching. Averell is articulary. Averell is crowning. Averell is simplified. If someone is simplified and touching then they are unsugared. If someone is simplified then they are incendiary. Big, crowning people are unsugared. If someone is simplified and unsugared then they are crowning. Nice people are simplified. If someone is partible and simplified then they are touching. Blue people are articulary. Blue people are simplified. Alton is unsugared.", "logic": "\nPartible(vivi)\nUnsugared(vivi)\nCrowning(vivi)\nPartible(valaree)\nTouching(alton)\nArticulary(alton)\nSimplified(alton)\nIncendiary(averell)\nTouching(averell)\nArticulary(averell)\nCrowning(averell)\nSimplified(averell)\nforall x (Simplified(x) and Touching(x) -> Unsugared(x))\nforall x (Simplified(x) -> Incendiary(x))\nforall x (Incendiary(x) and Crowning(x) -> Unsugared(x))\nforall x (Simplified(x) and Unsugared(x) -> Crowning(x))\nforall x (Articulary(x) -> Simplified(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) and Simplified(x) -> Touching(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Articulary(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Simplified(x))\n\nUnsugared(alton)\n\nSimplified(alton) and Touching(alton) and forall x (Simplified(x) and Touching(x) -> Unsugared(x)) -> therefore Unsugared(alton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Doretta is sinuate. Doretta is dignified. Doretta is genetical. Ninnetta is sinuate. Collins is freckled. Collins is reprobate. Collins is vacuous. Andrew is chestnut. Andrew is freckled. Andrew is reprobate. Andrew is genetical. Andrew is vacuous. If someone is vacuous and freckled then they are dignified. If someone is vacuous then they are chestnut. Big, genetical people are dignified. If someone is vacuous and dignified then they are genetical. Nice people are vacuous. If someone is sinuate and vacuous then they are freckled. Blue people are reprobate. Blue people are vacuous. Collins is not dignified.", "logic": "\nSinuate(doretta)\nDignified(doretta)\nGenetical(doretta)\nSinuate(ninnetta)\nFreckled(collins)\nReprobate(collins)\nVacuous(collins)\nChestnut(andrew)\nFreckled(andrew)\nReprobate(andrew)\nGenetical(andrew)\nVacuous(andrew)\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Freckled(x) -> Dignified(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) -> Chestnut(x))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) and Genetical(x) -> Dignified(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Dignified(x) -> Genetical(x))\nforall x (Reprobate(x) -> Vacuous(x))\nforall x (Sinuate(x) and Vacuous(x) -> Freckled(x))\nforall x (Freckled(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Freckled(x) -> Vacuous(x))\n\nnot Dignified(collins)\n\nVacuous(collins) and Freckled(collins) and forall x (Vacuous(x) and Freckled(x) -> Dignified(x)) -> therefore Dignified(collins)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Gina is chitinous. Gina is puny. Gina is epistolary. Gipsy is chitinous. Abe is uncured. Abe is georgian. Abe is flattering. Phelia is premedical. Phelia is uncured. Phelia is georgian. Phelia is epistolary. Phelia is flattering. If someone is flattering and uncured then they are puny. If someone is flattering then they are premedical. Big, epistolary people are puny. If someone is flattering and puny then they are epistolary. Nice people are flattering. If someone is chitinous and flattering then they are uncured. Blue people are georgian. Blue people are flattering. Abe is epistolary.", "logic": "\nChitinous(gina)\nPuny(gina)\nEpistolary(gina)\nChitinous(gipsy)\nUncured(abe)\nGeorgian(abe)\nFlattering(abe)\nPremedical(phelia)\nUncured(phelia)\nGeorgian(phelia)\nEpistolary(phelia)\nFlattering(phelia)\nforall x (Flattering(x) and Uncured(x) -> Puny(x))\nforall x (Flattering(x) -> Premedical(x))\nforall x (Premedical(x) and Epistolary(x) -> Puny(x))\nforall x (Flattering(x) and Puny(x) -> Epistolary(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Flattering(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) and Flattering(x) -> Uncured(x))\nforall x (Uncured(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Uncured(x) -> Flattering(x))\n\nEpistolary(abe)\n\nFlattering(abe) and Uncured(abe) and forall x (Flattering(x) and Uncured(x) -> Puny(x)) -> therefore Puny(abe) Flattering(abe) and Puny(abe) and forall x (Flattering(x) and Puny(x) -> Epistolary(x)) -> therefore Epistolary(abe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Thorn is begotten. Thorn is empathetic. Thorn is literal. Gray is begotten. Tess is assured. Tess is catchy. Tess is galvanic. Ferinand is rostrate. Ferinand is assured. Ferinand is catchy. Ferinand is literal. Ferinand is galvanic. If someone is galvanic and assured then they are empathetic. If someone is galvanic then they are rostrate. Big, literal people are empathetic. If someone is galvanic and empathetic then they are literal. Nice people are galvanic. If someone is begotten and galvanic then they are assured. Blue people are catchy. Blue people are galvanic. Tess is not literal.", "logic": "\nBegotten(thorn)\nEmpathetic(thorn)\nLiteral(thorn)\nBegotten(gray)\nAssured(tess)\nCatchy(tess)\nGalvanic(tess)\nRostrate(ferinand)\nAssured(ferinand)\nCatchy(ferinand)\nLiteral(ferinand)\nGalvanic(ferinand)\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Assured(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) -> Rostrate(x))\nforall x (Rostrate(x) and Literal(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Empathetic(x) -> Literal(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Begotten(x) and Galvanic(x) -> Assured(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Catchy(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Galvanic(x))\n\nnot Literal(tess)\n\nGalvanic(tess) and Assured(tess) and forall x (Galvanic(x) and Assured(x) -> Empathetic(x)) -> therefore Empathetic(tess) Galvanic(tess) and Empathetic(tess) and forall x (Galvanic(x) and Empathetic(x) -> Literal(x)) -> therefore Literal(tess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Candace is serpentine. Candace is reversible. Candace is propulsive. Nilson is serpentine. Alleen is imperfect. Alleen is burked. Alleen is brittle. Zedekiah is potential. Zedekiah is imperfect. Zedekiah is burked. Zedekiah is propulsive. Zedekiah is brittle. If someone is brittle and imperfect then they are reversible. If someone is brittle then they are potential. Big, propulsive people are reversible. If someone is brittle and reversible then they are propulsive. Nice people are brittle. If someone is serpentine and brittle then they are imperfect. Blue people are burked. Blue people are brittle. Candace is not burked.", "logic": "\nSerpentine(candace)\nReversible(candace)\nPropulsive(candace)\nSerpentine(nilson)\nImperfect(alleen)\nBurked(alleen)\nBrittle(alleen)\nPotential(zedekiah)\nImperfect(zedekiah)\nBurked(zedekiah)\nPropulsive(zedekiah)\nBrittle(zedekiah)\nforall x (Brittle(x) and Imperfect(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Brittle(x) -> Potential(x))\nforall x (Potential(x) and Propulsive(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Brittle(x) and Reversible(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Burked(x) -> Brittle(x))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) and Brittle(x) -> Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Imperfect(x) -> Burked(x))\nforall x (Imperfect(x) -> Brittle(x))\n\nnot Burked(candace)\n\nforall x (Imperfect(x) -> Burked(x)) <- forall x (Serpentine(x) and Brittle(x) -> Imperfect(x)) <- forall x (Burked(x) -> Brittle(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Barry is cranial. Barry is fanged. Barry is monestrous. Thorsten is cranial. Ellene is lost. Ellene is uneducated. Ellene is hypotonic. Edie is pretended. Edie is lost. Edie is uneducated. Edie is monestrous. Edie is hypotonic. If someone is hypotonic and lost then they are fanged. If someone is hypotonic then they are pretended. Big, monestrous people are fanged. If someone is hypotonic and fanged then they are monestrous. Nice people are hypotonic. If someone is cranial and hypotonic then they are lost. Blue people are uneducated. Blue people are hypotonic. Thorsten is lost.", "logic": "\nCranial(barry)\nFanged(barry)\nMonestrous(barry)\nCranial(thorsten)\nLost(ellene)\nUneducated(ellene)\nHypotonic(ellene)\nPretended(edie)\nLost(edie)\nUneducated(edie)\nMonestrous(edie)\nHypotonic(edie)\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) and Lost(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) -> Pretended(x))\nforall x (Pretended(x) and Monestrous(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) and Fanged(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Cranial(x) and Hypotonic(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\n\nLost(thorsten)\n\nforall x (Cranial(x) and Hypotonic(x) -> Lost(x)) <- forall x (Uneducated(x) -> Hypotonic(x)) <- forall x (Lost(x) -> Uneducated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Ema is neandertal. Ema is antigenic. Ema is penumbral. Karalee is neandertal. Francisca is glooming. Francisca is mawkish. Francisca is covariant. Lorie is quadruple. Lorie is glooming. Lorie is mawkish. Lorie is penumbral. Lorie is covariant. If someone is covariant and glooming then they are antigenic. If someone is covariant then they are quadruple. Big, penumbral people are antigenic. If someone is covariant and antigenic then they are penumbral. Nice people are covariant. If someone is neandertal and covariant then they are glooming. Blue people are mawkish. Blue people are covariant. Ema is not covariant.", "logic": "\nNeandertal(ema)\nAntigenic(ema)\nPenumbral(ema)\nNeandertal(karalee)\nGlooming(francisca)\nMawkish(francisca)\nCovariant(francisca)\nQuadruple(lorie)\nGlooming(lorie)\nMawkish(lorie)\nPenumbral(lorie)\nCovariant(lorie)\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Glooming(x) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) -> Quadruple(x))\nforall x (Quadruple(x) and Penumbral(x) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Antigenic(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) and Covariant(x) -> Glooming(x))\nforall x (Glooming(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Glooming(x) -> Covariant(x))\n\nnot Covariant(ema)\n\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Covariant(x)) <- forall x (Glooming(x) -> Mawkish(x)) <- forall x (Neandertal(x) and Covariant(x) -> Glooming(x)) <- forall x (Glooming(x) -> Covariant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Catrina is severable. Catrina is declarable. Catrina is lesbian. Marlee is severable. Laurens is encyclical. Laurens is placoid. Laurens is prakritic. Emmy is disciform. Emmy is encyclical. Emmy is placoid. Emmy is lesbian. Emmy is prakritic. If someone is prakritic and encyclical then they are declarable. If someone is prakritic then they are disciform. Big, lesbian people are declarable. If someone is prakritic and declarable then they are lesbian. Nice people are prakritic. If someone is severable and prakritic then they are encyclical. Blue people are placoid. Blue people are prakritic. Emmy is severable.", "logic": "\nSeverable(catrina)\nDeclarable(catrina)\nLesbian(catrina)\nSeverable(marlee)\nEncyclical(laurens)\nPlacoid(laurens)\nPrakritic(laurens)\nDisciform(emmy)\nEncyclical(emmy)\nPlacoid(emmy)\nLesbian(emmy)\nPrakritic(emmy)\nforall x (Prakritic(x) and Encyclical(x) -> Declarable(x))\nforall x (Prakritic(x) -> Disciform(x))\nforall x (Disciform(x) and Lesbian(x) -> Declarable(x))\nforall x (Prakritic(x) and Declarable(x) -> Lesbian(x))\nforall x (Placoid(x) -> Prakritic(x))\nforall x (Severable(x) and Prakritic(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Placoid(x))\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Prakritic(x))\n\nSeverable(emmy)\n\nSeverable(emmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1179"} {"premises": "Rickie is sober. Umeko is funky. Umeko is gaumless. Umeko is unknowing. Lynne is ovarian. Lynne is gaumless. Lynne is unknowing. Cold people are sober. If Umeko is funky then Umeko is ovarian. Lynne is gaumless.", "logic": "\nSober(rickie)\nFunky(umeko)\nGaumless(umeko)\nUnknowing(umeko)\nOvarian(lynne)\nGaumless(lynne)\nUnknowing(lynne)\nforall x (Ovarian(x) -> Sober(x))\nFunky(umeko) -> Ovarian(umeko)\n\nGaumless(lynne)\n\ntherefore Gaumless(lynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Elton is senatorial. Ina is easygoing. Ina is formalized. Ina is inflamed. Augustina is formosan. Augustina is formalized. Augustina is inflamed. Cold people are senatorial. If Ina is easygoing then Ina is formosan. Elton is not senatorial.", "logic": "\nSenatorial(elton)\nEasygoing(ina)\nFormalized(ina)\nInflamed(ina)\nFormosan(augustina)\nFormalized(augustina)\nInflamed(augustina)\nforall x (Formosan(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nEasygoing(ina) -> Formosan(ina)\n\nnot Senatorial(elton)\n\ntherefore Senatorial(elton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Franni is rimed. Scottie is burry. Scottie is concave. Scottie is fibreoptic. Zak is sneak. Zak is concave. Zak is fibreoptic. Cold people are rimed. If Scottie is burry then Scottie is sneak. Scottie is sneak.", "logic": "\nRimed(franni)\nBurry(scottie)\nConcave(scottie)\nFibreoptic(scottie)\nSneak(zak)\nConcave(zak)\nFibreoptic(zak)\nforall x (Sneak(x) -> Rimed(x))\nBurry(scottie) -> Sneak(scottie)\n\nSneak(scottie)\n\nBurry(scottie) and Burry(scottie) -> Sneak(scottie) -> therefore Sneak(scottie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Kenton is pitted. Emmi is spiritous. Emmi is postmortal. Emmi is handsewn. Aviva is confounded. Aviva is postmortal. Aviva is handsewn. Cold people are pitted. If Emmi is spiritous then Emmi is confounded. Aviva is not pitted.", "logic": "\nPitted(kenton)\nSpiritous(emmi)\nPostmortal(emmi)\nHandsewn(emmi)\nConfounded(aviva)\nPostmortal(aviva)\nHandsewn(aviva)\nforall x (Confounded(x) -> Pitted(x))\nSpiritous(emmi) -> Confounded(emmi)\n\nnot Pitted(aviva)\n\nConfounded(aviva) and forall x (Confounded(x) -> Pitted(x)) -> therefore Pitted(aviva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Morissa is squatty. Graham is unheeded. Graham is dishy. Graham is wounding. Derby is gluey. Derby is dishy. Derby is wounding. Cold people are squatty. If Graham is unheeded then Graham is gluey. Graham is squatty.", "logic": "\nSquatty(morissa)\nUnheeded(graham)\nDishy(graham)\nWounding(graham)\nGluey(derby)\nDishy(derby)\nWounding(derby)\nforall x (Gluey(x) -> Squatty(x))\nUnheeded(graham) -> Gluey(graham)\n\nSquatty(graham)\n\nUnheeded(graham) and Unheeded(graham) -> Gluey(graham) -> therefore Gluey(graham) Gluey(graham) and forall x (Gluey(x) -> Squatty(x)) -> therefore Squatty(graham)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Fidela is pretend. Breanne is gritty. Breanne is roofed. Breanne is oversewn. Ben is viennese. Ben is roofed. Ben is oversewn. Cold people are pretend. If Breanne is gritty then Breanne is viennese. Breanne is not pretend.", "logic": "\nPretend(fidela)\nGritty(breanne)\nRoofed(breanne)\nOversewn(breanne)\nViennese(ben)\nRoofed(ben)\nOversewn(ben)\nforall x (Viennese(x) -> Pretend(x))\nGritty(breanne) -> Viennese(breanne)\n\nnot Pretend(breanne)\n\nGritty(breanne) and Gritty(breanne) -> Viennese(breanne) -> therefore Viennese(breanne) Viennese(breanne) and forall x (Viennese(x) -> Pretend(x)) -> therefore Pretend(breanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Caryn is whiny. Simonette is dalmatian. Simonette is delusory. Simonette is decumbent. Laila is boxy. Laila is delusory. Laila is decumbent. Cold people are whiny. If Simonette is dalmatian then Simonette is boxy. Simonette is not green.", "logic": "\nWhiny(caryn)\nDalmatian(simonette)\nDelusory(simonette)\nDecumbent(simonette)\nBoxy(laila)\nDelusory(laila)\nDecumbent(laila)\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Whiny(x))\nDalmatian(simonette) -> Boxy(simonette)\n\nnot Green(simonette)\n\nnot Green(simonette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Jolie is darling. Kirby is distressed. Kirby is scapose. Kirby is diluted. Herve is calycled. Herve is scapose. Herve is diluted. Cold people are darling. If Kirby is distressed then Kirby is calycled. Herve is red.", "logic": "\nDarling(jolie)\nDistressed(kirby)\nScapose(kirby)\nDiluted(kirby)\nCalycled(herve)\nScapose(herve)\nDiluted(herve)\nforall x (Calycled(x) -> Darling(x))\nDistressed(kirby) -> Calycled(kirby)\n\nRed(herve)\n\nRed(herve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Lukas is askew. Lark is explicable. Lark is scentless. Lark is sickening. Leonanie is dishonest. Leonanie is scentless. Leonanie is sickening. Cold people are askew. If Lark is explicable then Lark is dishonest. Lukas is not explicable.", "logic": "\nAskew(lukas)\nExplicable(lark)\nScentless(lark)\nSickening(lark)\nDishonest(leonanie)\nScentless(leonanie)\nSickening(leonanie)\nforall x (Dishonest(x) -> Askew(x))\nExplicable(lark) -> Dishonest(lark)\n\nnot Explicable(lukas)\n\nnot Explicable(lukas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Gui is unrivaled. Elga is colorfast. Elga is metric. Elga is mediated. Felice is curtal. Felice is metric. Felice is mediated. Cold people are unrivaled. If Elga is colorfast then Elga is curtal. Felice is colorfast.", "logic": "\nUnrivaled(gui)\nColorfast(elga)\nMetric(elga)\nMediated(elga)\nCurtal(felice)\nMetric(felice)\nMediated(felice)\nforall x (Curtal(x) -> Unrivaled(x))\nColorfast(elga) -> Curtal(elga)\n\nColorfast(felice)\n\nColorfast(felice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Laurianne is uremic. Lia is telling. Lia is pimply. Lia is unionized. Merrielle is fictional. Merrielle is pimply. Merrielle is unionized. Cold people are uremic. If Lia is telling then Lia is fictional. Laurianne is not fictional.", "logic": "\nUremic(laurianne)\nTelling(lia)\nPimply(lia)\nUnionized(lia)\nFictional(merrielle)\nPimply(merrielle)\nUnionized(merrielle)\nforall x (Fictional(x) -> Uremic(x))\nTelling(lia) -> Fictional(lia)\n\nnot Fictional(laurianne)\n\nnot Fictional(laurianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Henka is cambodian. Jordy is heathenish. Jordy is dioecious. Jordy is endocrinal. Dita is undutiful. Dita is dioecious. Dita is endocrinal. Cold people are cambodian. If Jordy is heathenish then Jordy is undutiful. Henka is endocrinal.", "logic": "\nCambodian(henka)\nHeathenish(jordy)\nDioecious(jordy)\nEndocrinal(jordy)\nUndutiful(dita)\nDioecious(dita)\nEndocrinal(dita)\nforall x (Undutiful(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nHeathenish(jordy) -> Undutiful(jordy)\n\nEndocrinal(henka)\n\nEndocrinal(henka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1717"} {"premises": "Audi is chronic. Audi is shuddering. Audi is national. Audi is decayed. Audi is uniparous. Audi is breasted. Audi is delusive. Karon is shuddering. Karon is uniparous. Karon is delusive. Travis is chronic. Travis is national. Travis is decayed. Travis is breasted. Travis is delusive. Quiet things are chronic. If Karon is shuddering then Karon is decayed. Audi is uniparous.", "logic": "\nChronic(audi)\nShuddering(audi)\nNational(audi)\nDecayed(audi)\nUniparous(audi)\nBreasted(audi)\nDelusive(audi)\nShuddering(karon)\nUniparous(karon)\nDelusive(karon)\nChronic(travis)\nNational(travis)\nDecayed(travis)\nBreasted(travis)\nDelusive(travis)\nforall x (Decayed(x) -> Chronic(x))\nShuddering(karon) -> Decayed(karon)\n\nUniparous(audi)\n\ntherefore Uniparous(audi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Melania is pinched. Melania is pediatric. Melania is tortuous. Melania is fifth. Melania is anorectic. Melania is lifelong. Melania is lavender. Gussie is pediatric. Gussie is anorectic. Gussie is lavender. Bryon is pinched. Bryon is tortuous. Bryon is fifth. Bryon is lifelong. Bryon is lavender. Quiet things are pinched. If Gussie is pediatric then Gussie is fifth. Melania is not pediatric.", "logic": "\nPinched(melania)\nPediatric(melania)\nTortuous(melania)\nFifth(melania)\nAnorectic(melania)\nLifelong(melania)\nLavender(melania)\nPediatric(gussie)\nAnorectic(gussie)\nLavender(gussie)\nPinched(bryon)\nTortuous(bryon)\nFifth(bryon)\nLifelong(bryon)\nLavender(bryon)\nforall x (Fifth(x) -> Pinched(x))\nPediatric(gussie) -> Fifth(gussie)\n\nnot Pediatric(melania)\n\ntherefore Pediatric(melania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Aurelia is wholesale. Aurelia is aural. Aurelia is tenfold. Aurelia is analyzable. Aurelia is winning. Aurelia is zionist. Aurelia is separate. Tomasine is aural. Tomasine is winning. Tomasine is separate. Nathanil is wholesale. Nathanil is tenfold. Nathanil is analyzable. Nathanil is zionist. Nathanil is separate. Quiet things are wholesale. If Tomasine is aural then Tomasine is analyzable. Tomasine is analyzable.", "logic": "\nWholesale(aurelia)\nAural(aurelia)\nTenfold(aurelia)\nAnalyzable(aurelia)\nWinning(aurelia)\nZionist(aurelia)\nSeparate(aurelia)\nAural(tomasine)\nWinning(tomasine)\nSeparate(tomasine)\nWholesale(nathanil)\nTenfold(nathanil)\nAnalyzable(nathanil)\nZionist(nathanil)\nSeparate(nathanil)\nforall x (Analyzable(x) -> Wholesale(x))\nAural(tomasine) -> Analyzable(tomasine)\n\nAnalyzable(tomasine)\n\nAural(tomasine) and Aural(tomasine) -> Analyzable(tomasine) -> therefore Analyzable(tomasine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Jerrome is gummed. Jerrome is phonic. Jerrome is peculiar. Jerrome is disrupted. Jerrome is dynamic. Jerrome is strange. Jerrome is ninetieth. Arthur is phonic. Arthur is dynamic. Arthur is ninetieth. Susanna is gummed. Susanna is peculiar. Susanna is disrupted. Susanna is strange. Susanna is ninetieth. Quiet things are gummed. If Arthur is phonic then Arthur is disrupted. Arthur is not disrupted.", "logic": "\nGummed(jerrome)\nPhonic(jerrome)\nPeculiar(jerrome)\nDisrupted(jerrome)\nDynamic(jerrome)\nStrange(jerrome)\nNinetieth(jerrome)\nPhonic(arthur)\nDynamic(arthur)\nNinetieth(arthur)\nGummed(susanna)\nPeculiar(susanna)\nDisrupted(susanna)\nStrange(susanna)\nNinetieth(susanna)\nforall x (Disrupted(x) -> Gummed(x))\nPhonic(arthur) -> Disrupted(arthur)\n\nnot Disrupted(arthur)\n\nPhonic(arthur) and Phonic(arthur) -> Disrupted(arthur) -> therefore Disrupted(arthur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Mommy is mere. Mommy is untended. Mommy is uncurbed. Mommy is eidetic. Mommy is reported. Mommy is close. Mommy is toupeed. Fletch is untended. Fletch is reported. Fletch is toupeed. Giovanne is mere. Giovanne is uncurbed. Giovanne is eidetic. Giovanne is close. Giovanne is toupeed. Quiet things are mere. If Fletch is untended then Fletch is eidetic. Fletch is mere.", "logic": "\nMere(mommy)\nUntended(mommy)\nUncurbed(mommy)\nEidetic(mommy)\nReported(mommy)\nClose(mommy)\nToupeed(mommy)\nUntended(fletch)\nReported(fletch)\nToupeed(fletch)\nMere(giovanne)\nUncurbed(giovanne)\nEidetic(giovanne)\nClose(giovanne)\nToupeed(giovanne)\nforall x (Eidetic(x) -> Mere(x))\nUntended(fletch) -> Eidetic(fletch)\n\nMere(fletch)\n\nUntended(fletch) and Untended(fletch) -> Eidetic(fletch) -> therefore Eidetic(fletch) Eidetic(fletch) and forall x (Eidetic(x) -> Mere(x)) -> therefore Mere(fletch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Bertha is guileful. Bertha is untempting. Bertha is plain. Bertha is duplicate. Bertha is clubbable. Bertha is captious. Bertha is covariant. Daffy is untempting. Daffy is clubbable. Daffy is covariant. Mischa is guileful. Mischa is plain. Mischa is duplicate. Mischa is captious. Mischa is covariant. Quiet things are guileful. If Daffy is untempting then Daffy is duplicate. Daffy is not guileful.", "logic": "\nGuileful(bertha)\nUntempting(bertha)\nPlain(bertha)\nDuplicate(bertha)\nClubbable(bertha)\nCaptious(bertha)\nCovariant(bertha)\nUntempting(daffy)\nClubbable(daffy)\nCovariant(daffy)\nGuileful(mischa)\nPlain(mischa)\nDuplicate(mischa)\nCaptious(mischa)\nCovariant(mischa)\nforall x (Duplicate(x) -> Guileful(x))\nUntempting(daffy) -> Duplicate(daffy)\n\nnot Guileful(daffy)\n\nUntempting(daffy) and Untempting(daffy) -> Duplicate(daffy) -> therefore Duplicate(daffy) Duplicate(daffy) and forall x (Duplicate(x) -> Guileful(x)) -> therefore Guileful(daffy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Lari is untoasted. Lari is incensed. Lari is embryonal. Lari is unalloyed. Lari is braised. Lari is prodromic. Lari is sweptwing. Zaria is incensed. Zaria is braised. Zaria is sweptwing. Alasdair is untoasted. Alasdair is embryonal. Alasdair is unalloyed. Alasdair is prodromic. Alasdair is sweptwing. Quiet things are untoasted. If Zaria is incensed then Zaria is unalloyed. Alasdair is not braised.", "logic": "\nUntoasted(lari)\nIncensed(lari)\nEmbryonal(lari)\nUnalloyed(lari)\nBraised(lari)\nProdromic(lari)\nSweptwing(lari)\nIncensed(zaria)\nBraised(zaria)\nSweptwing(zaria)\nUntoasted(alasdair)\nEmbryonal(alasdair)\nUnalloyed(alasdair)\nProdromic(alasdair)\nSweptwing(alasdair)\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nIncensed(zaria) -> Unalloyed(zaria)\n\nnot Braised(alasdair)\n\nnot Braised(alasdair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Hernando is petty. Hernando is mucinous. Hernando is parttime. Hernando is parturient. Hernando is mediate. Hernando is yellowish. Hernando is chylaceous. Eugenia is mucinous. Eugenia is mediate. Eugenia is chylaceous. Rory is petty. Rory is parttime. Rory is parturient. Rory is yellowish. Rory is chylaceous. Quiet things are petty. If Eugenia is mucinous then Eugenia is parturient. Eugenia is yellowish.", "logic": "\nPetty(hernando)\nMucinous(hernando)\nParttime(hernando)\nParturient(hernando)\nMediate(hernando)\nYellowish(hernando)\nChylaceous(hernando)\nMucinous(eugenia)\nMediate(eugenia)\nChylaceous(eugenia)\nPetty(rory)\nParttime(rory)\nParturient(rory)\nYellowish(rory)\nChylaceous(rory)\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Petty(x))\nMucinous(eugenia) -> Parturient(eugenia)\n\nYellowish(eugenia)\n\nYellowish(eugenia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Teresa is stated. Teresa is provident. Teresa is insecure. Teresa is riblike. Teresa is suspensive. Teresa is dietetical. Teresa is shed. Emmit is provident. Emmit is suspensive. Emmit is shed. Karon is stated. Karon is insecure. Karon is riblike. Karon is dietetical. Karon is shed. Quiet things are stated. If Emmit is provident then Emmit is riblike. Emmit is not insecure.", "logic": "\nStated(teresa)\nProvident(teresa)\nInsecure(teresa)\nRiblike(teresa)\nSuspensive(teresa)\nDietetical(teresa)\nShed(teresa)\nProvident(emmit)\nSuspensive(emmit)\nShed(emmit)\nStated(karon)\nInsecure(karon)\nRiblike(karon)\nDietetical(karon)\nShed(karon)\nforall x (Riblike(x) -> Stated(x))\nProvident(emmit) -> Riblike(emmit)\n\nnot Insecure(emmit)\n\nnot Insecure(emmit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Robin is cordless. Robin is tropical. Robin is continuous. Robin is relaxed. Robin is stoppered. Robin is literate. Robin is entranced. Ignazio is tropical. Ignazio is stoppered. Ignazio is entranced. Nert is cordless. Nert is continuous. Nert is relaxed. Nert is literate. Nert is entranced. Quiet things are cordless. If Ignazio is tropical then Ignazio is relaxed. Nert is tropical.", "logic": "\nCordless(robin)\nTropical(robin)\nContinuous(robin)\nRelaxed(robin)\nStoppered(robin)\nLiterate(robin)\nEntranced(robin)\nTropical(ignazio)\nStoppered(ignazio)\nEntranced(ignazio)\nCordless(nert)\nContinuous(nert)\nRelaxed(nert)\nLiterate(nert)\nEntranced(nert)\nforall x (Relaxed(x) -> Cordless(x))\nTropical(ignazio) -> Relaxed(ignazio)\n\nTropical(nert)\n\nTropical(nert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The anica is not tough. The bancroft is not chordate. The sheelah absorb the bancroft. The rad does not eat the sheelah. If the anica absorb the sheelah and the anica does not eat the bancroft then the bancroft absorb the rad. If something type the rad then the rad conform the sheelah. If something conform the bancroft and it is pleased then the bancroft does not eat the sheelah. If the sheelah absorb the bancroft and the sheelah conform the bancroft then the bancroft does not visit the anica. If something absorb the rad then it does not visit the sheelah. If the sheelah absorb the bancroft then the bancroft type the rad. If something absorb the bancroft then it does not eat the sheelah. If something conform the sheelah then the sheelah conform the bancroft. The rad does not eat the sheelah.", "logic": "\nnot Tough(anica)\nnot Chordate(bancroft)\nAbsorb(sheelah, bancroft)\nnot Absorb(rad, sheelah)\nAbsorb(anica, sheelah) and not Absorb(anica, bancroft) -> Absorb(bancroft, rad)\nforall x (Type(x, rad) -> Conform(rad, sheelah))\nforall x (Conform(x, bancroft) and Pleased(x) -> not Absorb(bancroft, sheelah))\nAbsorb(sheelah, bancroft) and Conform(sheelah, bancroft) -> not Type(bancroft, anica)\nforall x (Absorb(x, rad) -> not Type(x, sheelah))\nAbsorb(sheelah, bancroft) -> Type(bancroft, rad)\nforall x (Absorb(x, bancroft) -> not Absorb(x, sheelah))\nforall x (Conform(x, sheelah) -> Conform(sheelah, bancroft))\n\nnot Absorb(rad, sheelah)\n\ntherefore not Absorb(rad, sheelah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The caesar is not antonymous. The constancy is not augustan. The kitti charge the constancy. The inci does not eat the kitti. If the caesar charge the kitti and the caesar does not eat the constancy then the constancy charge the inci. If something retread the inci then the inci blend the kitti. If something blend the constancy and it is beetling then the constancy does not eat the kitti. If the kitti charge the constancy and the kitti blend the constancy then the constancy does not visit the caesar. If something charge the inci then it does not visit the kitti. If the kitti charge the constancy then the constancy retread the inci. If something charge the constancy then it does not eat the kitti. If something blend the kitti then the kitti blend the constancy. The constancy is augustan.", "logic": "\nnot Antonymous(caesar)\nnot Augustan(constancy)\nCharge(kitti, constancy)\nnot Charge(inci, kitti)\nCharge(caesar, kitti) and not Charge(caesar, constancy) -> Charge(constancy, inci)\nforall x (Retread(x, inci) -> Blend(inci, kitti))\nforall x (Blend(x, constancy) and Beetling(x) -> not Charge(constancy, kitti))\nCharge(kitti, constancy) and Blend(kitti, constancy) -> not Retread(constancy, caesar)\nforall x (Charge(x, inci) -> not Retread(x, kitti))\nCharge(kitti, constancy) -> Retread(constancy, inci)\nforall x (Charge(x, constancy) -> not Charge(x, kitti))\nforall x (Blend(x, kitti) -> Blend(kitti, constancy))\n\nAugustan(constancy)\n\ntherefore not Augustan(constancy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The gillian is not horrid. The kane is not fledgeling. The stuart brave the kane. The dyan does not eat the stuart. If the gillian brave the stuart and the gillian does not eat the kane then the kane brave the dyan. If something ennoble the dyan then the dyan portion the stuart. If something portion the kane and it is recumbent then the kane does not eat the stuart. If the stuart brave the kane and the stuart portion the kane then the kane does not visit the gillian. If something brave the dyan then it does not visit the stuart. If the stuart brave the kane then the kane ennoble the dyan. If something brave the kane then it does not eat the stuart. If something portion the stuart then the stuart portion the kane. The stuart does not eat the stuart.", "logic": "\nnot Horrid(gillian)\nnot Fledgeling(kane)\nBrave(stuart, kane)\nnot Brave(dyan, stuart)\nBrave(gillian, stuart) and not Brave(gillian, kane) -> Brave(kane, dyan)\nforall x (Ennoble(x, dyan) -> Portion(dyan, stuart))\nforall x (Portion(x, kane) and Recumbent(x) -> not Brave(kane, stuart))\nBrave(stuart, kane) and Portion(stuart, kane) -> not Ennoble(kane, gillian)\nforall x (Brave(x, dyan) -> not Ennoble(x, stuart))\nBrave(stuart, kane) -> Ennoble(kane, dyan)\nforall x (Brave(x, kane) -> not Brave(x, stuart))\nforall x (Portion(x, stuart) -> Portion(stuart, kane))\n\nnot Brave(stuart, stuart)\n\nBrave(stuart, kane) and forall x (Brave(x, kane) -> not Brave(x, stuart)) -> therefore not Brave(stuart, stuart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The shelli is not cased. The roxine is not sprigged. The leorah inundate the roxine. The harlie does not eat the leorah. If the shelli inundate the leorah and the shelli does not eat the roxine then the roxine inundate the harlie. If something plain the harlie then the harlie head the leorah. If something head the roxine and it is delayed then the roxine does not eat the leorah. If the leorah inundate the roxine and the leorah head the roxine then the roxine does not visit the shelli. If something inundate the harlie then it does not visit the leorah. If the leorah inundate the roxine then the roxine plain the harlie. If something inundate the roxine then it does not eat the leorah. If something head the leorah then the leorah head the roxine. The roxine does not visit the harlie.", "logic": "\nnot Cased(shelli)\nnot Sprigged(roxine)\nInundate(leorah, roxine)\nnot Inundate(harlie, leorah)\nInundate(shelli, leorah) and not Inundate(shelli, roxine) -> Inundate(roxine, harlie)\nforall x (Plain(x, harlie) -> Head(harlie, leorah))\nforall x (Head(x, roxine) and Delayed(x) -> not Inundate(roxine, leorah))\nInundate(leorah, roxine) and Head(leorah, roxine) -> not Plain(roxine, shelli)\nforall x (Inundate(x, harlie) -> not Plain(x, leorah))\nInundate(leorah, roxine) -> Plain(roxine, harlie)\nforall x (Inundate(x, roxine) -> not Inundate(x, leorah))\nforall x (Head(x, leorah) -> Head(leorah, roxine))\n\nnot Plain(roxine, harlie)\n\nInundate(leorah, roxine) and Inundate(leorah, roxine) -> Plain(roxine, harlie) -> therefore Plain(roxine, harlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The wenonah is not agape. The manda is not sanctioned. The curt bestialise the manda. The walsh does not eat the curt. If the wenonah bestialise the curt and the wenonah does not eat the manda then the manda bestialise the walsh. If something droop the walsh then the walsh collar the curt. If something collar the manda and it is offsides then the manda does not eat the curt. If the curt bestialise the manda and the curt collar the manda then the manda does not visit the wenonah. If something bestialise the walsh then it does not visit the curt. If the curt bestialise the manda then the manda droop the walsh. If something bestialise the manda then it does not eat the curt. If something collar the curt then the curt collar the manda. The walsh collar the curt.", "logic": "\nnot Agape(wenonah)\nnot Sanctioned(manda)\nBestialise(curt, manda)\nnot Bestialise(walsh, curt)\nBestialise(wenonah, curt) and not Bestialise(wenonah, manda) -> Bestialise(manda, walsh)\nforall x (Droop(x, walsh) -> Collar(walsh, curt))\nforall x (Collar(x, manda) and Offsides(x) -> not Bestialise(manda, curt))\nBestialise(curt, manda) and Collar(curt, manda) -> not Droop(manda, wenonah)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, walsh) -> not Droop(x, curt))\nBestialise(curt, manda) -> Droop(manda, walsh)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, manda) -> not Bestialise(x, curt))\nforall x (Collar(x, curt) -> Collar(curt, manda))\n\nCollar(walsh, curt)\n\nBestialise(curt, manda) and Bestialise(curt, manda) -> Droop(manda, walsh) -> therefore Droop(manda, walsh) Droop(manda, walsh) and forall x (Droop(x, walsh) -> Collar(walsh, curt)) -> therefore Collar(walsh, curt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The beale is not absolute. The enrico is not submersed. The marcello surfeit the enrico. The town does not eat the marcello. If the beale surfeit the marcello and the beale does not eat the enrico then the enrico surfeit the town. If something zipper the town then the town radiate the marcello. If something radiate the enrico and it is bedewed then the enrico does not eat the marcello. If the marcello surfeit the enrico and the marcello radiate the enrico then the enrico does not visit the beale. If something surfeit the town then it does not visit the marcello. If the marcello surfeit the enrico then the enrico zipper the town. If something surfeit the enrico then it does not eat the marcello. If something radiate the marcello then the marcello radiate the enrico. The town does not need the marcello.", "logic": "\nnot Absolute(beale)\nnot Submersed(enrico)\nSurfeit(marcello, enrico)\nnot Surfeit(town, marcello)\nSurfeit(beale, marcello) and not Surfeit(beale, enrico) -> Surfeit(enrico, town)\nforall x (Zipper(x, town) -> Radiate(town, marcello))\nforall x (Radiate(x, enrico) and Bedewed(x) -> not Surfeit(enrico, marcello))\nSurfeit(marcello, enrico) and Radiate(marcello, enrico) -> not Zipper(enrico, beale)\nforall x (Surfeit(x, town) -> not Zipper(x, marcello))\nSurfeit(marcello, enrico) -> Zipper(enrico, town)\nforall x (Surfeit(x, enrico) -> not Surfeit(x, marcello))\nforall x (Radiate(x, marcello) -> Radiate(marcello, enrico))\n\nnot Radiate(town, marcello)\n\nSurfeit(marcello, enrico) and Surfeit(marcello, enrico) -> Zipper(enrico, town) -> therefore Zipper(enrico, town) Zipper(enrico, town) and forall x (Zipper(x, town) -> Radiate(town, marcello)) -> therefore Radiate(town, marcello)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The annette is not buzzing. The nelia is not disused. The shayne gloat the nelia. The elysha does not eat the shayne. If the annette gloat the shayne and the annette does not eat the nelia then the nelia gloat the elysha. If something clinch the elysha then the elysha dissonate the shayne. If something dissonate the nelia and it is unmerciful then the nelia does not eat the shayne. If the shayne gloat the nelia and the shayne dissonate the nelia then the nelia does not visit the annette. If something gloat the elysha then it does not visit the shayne. If the shayne gloat the nelia then the nelia clinch the elysha. If something gloat the nelia then it does not eat the shayne. If something dissonate the shayne then the shayne dissonate the nelia. The nelia does not eat the elysha.", "logic": "\nnot Buzzing(annette)\nnot Disused(nelia)\nGloat(shayne, nelia)\nnot Gloat(elysha, shayne)\nGloat(annette, shayne) and not Gloat(annette, nelia) -> Gloat(nelia, elysha)\nforall x (Clinch(x, elysha) -> Dissonate(elysha, shayne))\nforall x (Dissonate(x, nelia) and Unmerciful(x) -> not Gloat(nelia, shayne))\nGloat(shayne, nelia) and Dissonate(shayne, nelia) -> not Clinch(nelia, annette)\nforall x (Gloat(x, elysha) -> not Clinch(x, shayne))\nGloat(shayne, nelia) -> Clinch(nelia, elysha)\nforall x (Gloat(x, nelia) -> not Gloat(x, shayne))\nforall x (Dissonate(x, shayne) -> Dissonate(shayne, nelia))\n\nnot Gloat(nelia, elysha)\n\nGloat(annette, shayne) and not Gloat(annette, nelia) -> Gloat(nelia, elysha) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The francine is not colonised. The julianne is not exultant. The lovell jackrabbit the julianne. The ilka does not eat the lovell. If the francine jackrabbit the lovell and the francine does not eat the julianne then the julianne jackrabbit the ilka. If something embark the ilka then the ilka reallocate the lovell. If something reallocate the julianne and it is weekly then the julianne does not eat the lovell. If the lovell jackrabbit the julianne and the lovell reallocate the julianne then the julianne does not visit the francine. If something jackrabbit the ilka then it does not visit the lovell. If the lovell jackrabbit the julianne then the julianne embark the ilka. If something jackrabbit the julianne then it does not eat the lovell. If something reallocate the lovell then the lovell reallocate the julianne. The lovell is weekly.", "logic": "\nnot Colonised(francine)\nnot Exultant(julianne)\nJackrabbit(lovell, julianne)\nnot Jackrabbit(ilka, lovell)\nJackrabbit(francine, lovell) and not Jackrabbit(francine, julianne) -> Jackrabbit(julianne, ilka)\nforall x (Embark(x, ilka) -> Reallocate(ilka, lovell))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, julianne) and Weekly(x) -> not Jackrabbit(julianne, lovell))\nJackrabbit(lovell, julianne) and Reallocate(lovell, julianne) -> not Embark(julianne, francine)\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, ilka) -> not Embark(x, lovell))\nJackrabbit(lovell, julianne) -> Embark(julianne, ilka)\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, julianne) -> not Jackrabbit(x, lovell))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, lovell) -> Reallocate(lovell, julianne))\n\nWeekly(lovell)\n\nWeekly(lovell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The plato is not spiteful. The brendan is not great. The arturo slam the brendan. The denys does not eat the arturo. If the plato slam the arturo and the plato does not eat the brendan then the brendan slam the denys. If something classicise the denys then the denys stew the arturo. If something stew the brendan and it is upcurved then the brendan does not eat the arturo. If the arturo slam the brendan and the arturo stew the brendan then the brendan does not visit the plato. If something slam the denys then it does not visit the arturo. If the arturo slam the brendan then the brendan classicise the denys. If something slam the brendan then it does not eat the arturo. If something stew the arturo then the arturo stew the brendan. The brendan does not eat the brendan.", "logic": "\nnot Spiteful(plato)\nnot Great(brendan)\nSlam(arturo, brendan)\nnot Slam(denys, arturo)\nSlam(plato, arturo) and not Slam(plato, brendan) -> Slam(brendan, denys)\nforall x (Classicise(x, denys) -> Stew(denys, arturo))\nforall x (Stew(x, brendan) and Upcurved(x) -> not Slam(brendan, arturo))\nSlam(arturo, brendan) and Stew(arturo, brendan) -> not Classicise(brendan, plato)\nforall x (Slam(x, denys) -> not Classicise(x, arturo))\nSlam(arturo, brendan) -> Classicise(brendan, denys)\nforall x (Slam(x, brendan) -> not Slam(x, arturo))\nforall x (Stew(x, arturo) -> Stew(arturo, brendan))\n\nnot Slam(brendan, brendan)\n\nnot Slam(brendan, brendan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The korie is not estranged. The kelcie is not small. The joly limit the kelcie. The virgie does not eat the joly. If the korie limit the joly and the korie does not eat the kelcie then the kelcie limit the virgie. If something anagram the virgie then the virgie photostat the joly. If something photostat the kelcie and it is medium then the kelcie does not eat the joly. If the joly limit the kelcie and the joly photostat the kelcie then the kelcie does not visit the korie. If something limit the virgie then it does not visit the joly. If the joly limit the kelcie then the kelcie anagram the virgie. If something limit the kelcie then it does not eat the joly. If something photostat the joly then the joly photostat the kelcie. The korie limit the korie.", "logic": "\nnot Estranged(korie)\nnot Small(kelcie)\nLimit(joly, kelcie)\nnot Limit(virgie, joly)\nLimit(korie, joly) and not Limit(korie, kelcie) -> Limit(kelcie, virgie)\nforall x (Anagram(x, virgie) -> Photostat(virgie, joly))\nforall x (Photostat(x, kelcie) and Medium(x) -> not Limit(kelcie, joly))\nLimit(joly, kelcie) and Photostat(joly, kelcie) -> not Anagram(kelcie, korie)\nforall x (Limit(x, virgie) -> not Anagram(x, joly))\nLimit(joly, kelcie) -> Anagram(kelcie, virgie)\nforall x (Limit(x, kelcie) -> not Limit(x, joly))\nforall x (Photostat(x, joly) -> Photostat(joly, kelcie))\n\nLimit(korie, korie)\n\nLimit(korie, korie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The andrus is not epizootic. The clayborne is not undaunted. The candice dupe the clayborne. The oswell does not eat the candice. If the andrus dupe the candice and the andrus does not eat the clayborne then the clayborne dupe the oswell. If something helm the oswell then the oswell sprint the candice. If something sprint the clayborne and it is conscious then the clayborne does not eat the candice. If the candice dupe the clayborne and the candice sprint the clayborne then the clayborne does not visit the andrus. If something dupe the oswell then it does not visit the candice. If the candice dupe the clayborne then the clayborne helm the oswell. If something dupe the clayborne then it does not eat the candice. If something sprint the candice then the candice sprint the clayborne. The clayborne is not blue.", "logic": "\nnot Epizootic(andrus)\nnot Undaunted(clayborne)\nDupe(candice, clayborne)\nnot Dupe(oswell, candice)\nDupe(andrus, candice) and not Dupe(andrus, clayborne) -> Dupe(clayborne, oswell)\nforall x (Helm(x, oswell) -> Sprint(oswell, candice))\nforall x (Sprint(x, clayborne) and Conscious(x) -> not Dupe(clayborne, candice))\nDupe(candice, clayborne) and Sprint(candice, clayborne) -> not Helm(clayborne, andrus)\nforall x (Dupe(x, oswell) -> not Helm(x, candice))\nDupe(candice, clayborne) -> Helm(clayborne, oswell)\nforall x (Dupe(x, clayborne) -> not Dupe(x, candice))\nforall x (Sprint(x, candice) -> Sprint(candice, clayborne))\n\nnot Blue(clayborne)\n\nnot Blue(clayborne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The aldric is not unpitying. The lyndy is not expensive. The kelley cowhide the lyndy. The tiertza does not eat the kelley. If the aldric cowhide the kelley and the aldric does not eat the lyndy then the lyndy cowhide the tiertza. If something scowl the tiertza then the tiertza prizefight the kelley. If something prizefight the lyndy and it is deathlike then the lyndy does not eat the kelley. If the kelley cowhide the lyndy and the kelley prizefight the lyndy then the lyndy does not visit the aldric. If something cowhide the tiertza then it does not visit the kelley. If the kelley cowhide the lyndy then the lyndy scowl the tiertza. If something cowhide the lyndy then it does not eat the kelley. If something prizefight the kelley then the kelley prizefight the lyndy. The kelley cowhide the tiertza.", "logic": "\nnot Unpitying(aldric)\nnot Expensive(lyndy)\nCowhide(kelley, lyndy)\nnot Cowhide(tiertza, kelley)\nCowhide(aldric, kelley) and not Cowhide(aldric, lyndy) -> Cowhide(lyndy, tiertza)\nforall x (Scowl(x, tiertza) -> Prizefight(tiertza, kelley))\nforall x (Prizefight(x, lyndy) and Deathlike(x) -> not Cowhide(lyndy, kelley))\nCowhide(kelley, lyndy) and Prizefight(kelley, lyndy) -> not Scowl(lyndy, aldric)\nforall x (Cowhide(x, tiertza) -> not Scowl(x, kelley))\nCowhide(kelley, lyndy) -> Scowl(lyndy, tiertza)\nforall x (Cowhide(x, lyndy) -> not Cowhide(x, kelley))\nforall x (Prizefight(x, kelley) -> Prizefight(kelley, lyndy))\n\nCowhide(kelley, tiertza)\n\nCowhide(kelley, tiertza) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1380"} {"premises": "The adolph is finer. The zola is finer. The phelia is lovesome. The bartlett unbridle the zola. If something unbridle the zola then it swob the phelia. If something swob the phelia then the phelia is not relaxant. The phelia is lovesome.", "logic": "\nFiner(adolph)\nFiner(zola)\nLovesome(phelia)\nUnbridle(bartlett, zola)\nforall x (Unbridle(x, zola) -> Swob(x, phelia))\nforall x (Swob(x, phelia) -> not Relaxant(phelia))\n\nLovesome(phelia)\n\ntherefore Lovesome(phelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The cally is each. The clemente is each. The jacinthe is enwrapped. The pavel replicate the clemente. If something replicate the clemente then it watch the jacinthe. If something watch the jacinthe then the jacinthe is not underway. The jacinthe is not enwrapped.", "logic": "\nEach(cally)\nEach(clemente)\nEnwrapped(jacinthe)\nReplicate(pavel, clemente)\nforall x (Replicate(x, clemente) -> Watch(x, jacinthe))\nforall x (Watch(x, jacinthe) -> not Underway(jacinthe))\n\nnot Enwrapped(jacinthe)\n\ntherefore Enwrapped(jacinthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The normand is nauseated. The isidore is nauseated. The ninnette is familiar. The thedrick monetise the isidore. If something monetise the isidore then it delimitate the ninnette. If something delimitate the ninnette then the ninnette is not sulfurized. The thedrick delimitate the ninnette.", "logic": "\nNauseated(normand)\nNauseated(isidore)\nFamiliar(ninnette)\nMonetise(thedrick, isidore)\nforall x (Monetise(x, isidore) -> Delimitate(x, ninnette))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, ninnette) -> not Sulfurized(ninnette))\n\nDelimitate(thedrick, ninnette)\n\nMonetise(thedrick, isidore) and forall x (Monetise(x, isidore) -> Delimitate(x, ninnette)) -> therefore Delimitate(thedrick, ninnette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The vida is indoor. The madelle is indoor. The traci is daft. The ruddy hyphenate the madelle. If something hyphenate the madelle then it interest the traci. If something interest the traci then the traci is not isoclinal. The ruddy does not visit the traci.", "logic": "\nIndoor(vida)\nIndoor(madelle)\nDaft(traci)\nHyphenate(ruddy, madelle)\nforall x (Hyphenate(x, madelle) -> Interest(x, traci))\nforall x (Interest(x, traci) -> not Isoclinal(traci))\n\nnot Interest(ruddy, traci)\n\nHyphenate(ruddy, madelle) and forall x (Hyphenate(x, madelle) -> Interest(x, traci)) -> therefore Interest(ruddy, traci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The wilburn is bilocular. The deidre is bilocular. The charles is bracing. The angela soften the deidre. If something soften the deidre then it scarf the charles. If something scarf the charles then the charles is not shattered. The charles is not shattered.", "logic": "\nBilocular(wilburn)\nBilocular(deidre)\nBracing(charles)\nSoften(angela, deidre)\nforall x (Soften(x, deidre) -> Scarf(x, charles))\nforall x (Scarf(x, charles) -> not Shattered(charles))\n\nnot Shattered(charles)\n\nSoften(angela, deidre) and forall x (Soften(x, deidre) -> Scarf(x, charles)) -> therefore Scarf(angela, charles) Scarf(angela, charles) and forall x (Scarf(x, charles) -> not Shattered(charles)) -> therefore not Shattered(charles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The eden is perky. The esau is perky. The sabina is christless. The berkley obscure the esau. If something obscure the esau then it tabularize the sabina. If something tabularize the sabina then the sabina is not unrelieved. The sabina is unrelieved.", "logic": "\nPerky(eden)\nPerky(esau)\nChristless(sabina)\nObscure(berkley, esau)\nforall x (Obscure(x, esau) -> Tabularize(x, sabina))\nforall x (Tabularize(x, sabina) -> not Unrelieved(sabina))\n\nUnrelieved(sabina)\n\nObscure(berkley, esau) and forall x (Obscure(x, esau) -> Tabularize(x, sabina)) -> therefore Tabularize(berkley, sabina) Tabularize(berkley, sabina) and forall x (Tabularize(x, sabina) -> not Unrelieved(sabina)) -> therefore not Unrelieved(sabina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The howie is interested. The susette is interested. The kettie is homing. The giuseppe azure the susette. If something azure the susette then it overtake the kettie. If something overtake the kettie then the kettie is not substitute. The kettie does not visit the kettie.", "logic": "\nInterested(howie)\nInterested(susette)\nHoming(kettie)\nAzure(giuseppe, susette)\nforall x (Azure(x, susette) -> Overtake(x, kettie))\nforall x (Overtake(x, kettie) -> not Substitute(kettie))\n\nnot Overtake(kettie, kettie)\n\nforall x (Azure(x, susette) -> Overtake(x, kettie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The jackelyn is bouldery. The kamila is bouldery. The gloriane is sewn. The odille foliate the kamila. If something foliate the kamila then it swaddle the gloriane. If something swaddle the gloriane then the gloriane is not valueless. The kamila swaddle the gloriane.", "logic": "\nBouldery(jackelyn)\nBouldery(kamila)\nSewn(gloriane)\nFoliate(odille, kamila)\nforall x (Foliate(x, kamila) -> Swaddle(x, gloriane))\nforall x (Swaddle(x, gloriane) -> not Valueless(gloriane))\n\nSwaddle(kamila, gloriane)\n\nforall x (Foliate(x, kamila) -> Swaddle(x, gloriane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The caroljean is attachable. The janaye is attachable. The bekki is sable. The hercule fade the janaye. If something fade the janaye then it encroach the bekki. If something encroach the bekki then the bekki is not endocrine. The caroljean does not visit the bekki.", "logic": "\nAttachable(caroljean)\nAttachable(janaye)\nSable(bekki)\nFade(hercule, janaye)\nforall x (Fade(x, janaye) -> Encroach(x, bekki))\nforall x (Encroach(x, bekki) -> not Endocrine(bekki))\n\nnot Encroach(caroljean, bekki)\n\nforall x (Fade(x, janaye) -> Encroach(x, bekki)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The chrysler is ringleted. The albatros is ringleted. The lenee is bismuthic. The hill steepen the albatros. If something steepen the albatros then it gesture the lenee. If something gesture the lenee then the lenee is not extensile. The albatros gesture the hill.", "logic": "\nRingleted(chrysler)\nRingleted(albatros)\nBismuthic(lenee)\nSteepen(hill, albatros)\nforall x (Steepen(x, albatros) -> Gesture(x, lenee))\nforall x (Gesture(x, lenee) -> not Extensile(lenee))\n\nGesture(albatros, hill)\n\nGesture(albatros, hill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The duncan is jangling. The sandie is jangling. The milt is unstated. The griffin dynamize the sandie. If something dynamize the sandie then it jack the milt. If something jack the milt then the milt is not screwy. The griffin is not red.", "logic": "\nJangling(duncan)\nJangling(sandie)\nUnstated(milt)\nDynamize(griffin, sandie)\nforall x (Dynamize(x, sandie) -> Jack(x, milt))\nforall x (Jack(x, milt) -> not Screwy(milt))\n\nnot Red(griffin)\n\nnot Red(griffin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The wilson is tittering. The mirabella is tittering. The wilbert is adoring. The libbey whelp the mirabella. If something whelp the mirabella then it counteract the wilbert. If something counteract the wilbert then the wilbert is not baleful. The libbey is tittering.", "logic": "\nTittering(wilson)\nTittering(mirabella)\nAdoring(wilbert)\nWhelp(libbey, mirabella)\nforall x (Whelp(x, mirabella) -> Counteract(x, wilbert))\nforall x (Counteract(x, wilbert) -> not Baleful(wilbert))\n\nTittering(libbey)\n\nTittering(libbey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2061"} {"premises": "The andros cavort the helli. The estel is dantean. The helli is handy. The etta is goosy. If someone cavort the helli then the helli is dantean. If the estel is handy and the estel legalize the etta then the etta is goosy. If someone is dantean then they need the estel. The estel is dantean.", "logic": "\nCavort(andros, helli)\nDantean(estel)\nHandy(helli)\nGoosy(etta)\nforall x (Cavort(x, helli) -> Dantean(helli))\nHandy(estel) and Legalize(estel, etta) -> Goosy(etta)\nforall x (Dantean(x) -> Apologize(x, estel))\n\nDantean(estel)\n\ntherefore Dantean(estel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The carmita melt the nanette. The quigman is protrusile. The nanette is nepali. The trista is nonhairy. If someone melt the nanette then the nanette is protrusile. If the quigman is nepali and the quigman page the trista then the trista is nonhairy. If someone is protrusile then they need the quigman. The nanette is not nepali.", "logic": "\nMelt(carmita, nanette)\nProtrusile(quigman)\nNepali(nanette)\nNonhairy(trista)\nforall x (Melt(x, nanette) -> Protrusile(nanette))\nNepali(quigman) and Page(quigman, trista) -> Nonhairy(trista)\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Bonk(x, quigman))\n\nnot Nepali(nanette)\n\ntherefore Nepali(nanette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The kellsie deposit the edmund. The alexia is unworkable. The edmund is mitigative. The eliza is crapulous. If someone deposit the edmund then the edmund is unworkable. If the alexia is mitigative and the alexia unbuckle the eliza then the eliza is crapulous. If someone is unworkable then they need the alexia. The alexia calumniate the alexia.", "logic": "\nDeposit(kellsie, edmund)\nUnworkable(alexia)\nMitigative(edmund)\nCrapulous(eliza)\nforall x (Deposit(x, edmund) -> Unworkable(edmund))\nMitigative(alexia) and Unbuckle(alexia, eliza) -> Crapulous(eliza)\nforall x (Unworkable(x) -> Calumniate(x, alexia))\n\nCalumniate(alexia, alexia)\n\nUnworkable(alexia) and forall x (Unworkable(x) -> Calumniate(x, alexia)) -> therefore Calumniate(alexia, alexia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The ingrid plasticise the simon. The rubin is univalent. The simon is xliii. The holley is meaningful. If someone plasticise the simon then the simon is univalent. If the rubin is xliii and the rubin shout the holley then the holley is meaningful. If someone is univalent then they need the rubin. The simon is not univalent.", "logic": "\nPlasticise(ingrid, simon)\nUnivalent(rubin)\nXliii(simon)\nMeaningful(holley)\nforall x (Plasticise(x, simon) -> Univalent(simon))\nXliii(rubin) and Shout(rubin, holley) -> Meaningful(holley)\nforall x (Univalent(x) -> Muscle(x, rubin))\n\nnot Univalent(simon)\n\nPlasticise(ingrid, simon) and forall x (Plasticise(x, simon) -> Univalent(simon)) -> therefore Univalent(simon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The wilbur stress the inci. The lawrence is glassed. The inci is bland. The jordan is petallike. If someone stress the inci then the inci is glassed. If the lawrence is bland and the lawrence decolonize the jordan then the jordan is petallike. If someone is glassed then they need the lawrence. The inci hypnotise the lawrence.", "logic": "\nStress(wilbur, inci)\nGlassed(lawrence)\nBland(inci)\nPetallike(jordan)\nforall x (Stress(x, inci) -> Glassed(inci))\nBland(lawrence) and Decolonize(lawrence, jordan) -> Petallike(jordan)\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Hypnotise(x, lawrence))\n\nHypnotise(inci, lawrence)\n\nStress(wilbur, inci) and forall x (Stress(x, inci) -> Glassed(inci)) -> therefore Glassed(inci) Glassed(inci) and forall x (Glassed(x) -> Hypnotise(x, lawrence)) -> therefore Hypnotise(inci, lawrence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The davita pole the ahmad. The melisse is andante. The ahmad is norse. The paolina is potbellied. If someone pole the ahmad then the ahmad is andante. If the melisse is norse and the melisse supercede the paolina then the paolina is potbellied. If someone is andante then they need the melisse. The ahmad does not need the melisse.", "logic": "\nPole(davita, ahmad)\nAndante(melisse)\nNorse(ahmad)\nPotbellied(paolina)\nforall x (Pole(x, ahmad) -> Andante(ahmad))\nNorse(melisse) and Supercede(melisse, paolina) -> Potbellied(paolina)\nforall x (Andante(x) -> Group(x, melisse))\n\nnot Group(ahmad, melisse)\n\nPole(davita, ahmad) and forall x (Pole(x, ahmad) -> Andante(ahmad)) -> therefore Andante(ahmad) Andante(ahmad) and forall x (Andante(x) -> Group(x, melisse)) -> therefore Group(ahmad, melisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The dayle endorse the lilia. The archibold is pronged. The lilia is dripless. The randolf is hardbacked. If someone endorse the lilia then the lilia is pronged. If the archibold is dripless and the archibold discipline the randolf then the randolf is hardbacked. If someone is pronged then they need the archibold. The randolf does not need the archibold.", "logic": "\nEndorse(dayle, lilia)\nPronged(archibold)\nDripless(lilia)\nHardbacked(randolf)\nforall x (Endorse(x, lilia) -> Pronged(lilia))\nDripless(archibold) and Discipline(archibold, randolf) -> Hardbacked(randolf)\nforall x (Pronged(x) -> Hate(x, archibold))\n\nnot Hate(randolf, archibold)\n\nforall x (Pronged(x) -> Hate(x, archibold)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The maynard vitaminize the elizabet. The ashlee is endergonic. The elizabet is ectodermic. The nevins is real. If someone vitaminize the elizabet then the elizabet is endergonic. If the ashlee is ectodermic and the ashlee filet the nevins then the nevins is real. If someone is endergonic then they need the ashlee. The maynard volley the ashlee.", "logic": "\nVitaminize(maynard, elizabet)\nEndergonic(ashlee)\nEctodermic(elizabet)\nReal(nevins)\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, elizabet) -> Endergonic(elizabet))\nEctodermic(ashlee) and Filet(ashlee, nevins) -> Real(nevins)\nforall x (Endergonic(x) -> Volley(x, ashlee))\n\nVolley(maynard, ashlee)\n\nforall x (Endergonic(x) -> Volley(x, ashlee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The phillis spam the amara. The raimund is noble. The amara is lustful. The hannah is runproof. If someone spam the amara then the amara is noble. If the raimund is lustful and the raimund depilate the hannah then the hannah is runproof. If someone is noble then they need the raimund. The phillis does not like the hannah.", "logic": "\nSpam(phillis, amara)\nNoble(raimund)\nLustful(amara)\nRunproof(hannah)\nforall x (Spam(x, amara) -> Noble(amara))\nLustful(raimund) and Depilate(raimund, hannah) -> Runproof(hannah)\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Misname(x, raimund))\n\nnot Depilate(phillis, hannah)\n\nnot Depilate(phillis, hannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The tildy bloviate the kraig. The jay is couthie. The kraig is pious. The lura is ulcerous. If someone bloviate the kraig then the kraig is couthie. If the jay is pious and the jay lour the lura then the lura is ulcerous. If someone is couthie then they need the jay. The jay is red.", "logic": "\nBloviate(tildy, kraig)\nCouthie(jay)\nPious(kraig)\nUlcerous(lura)\nforall x (Bloviate(x, kraig) -> Couthie(kraig))\nPious(jay) and Lour(jay, lura) -> Ulcerous(lura)\nforall x (Couthie(x) -> Verify(x, jay))\n\nRed(jay)\n\nRed(jay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The jarvis contain the katusha. The charyl is lowbrow. The katusha is nonopening. The mattheus is dulcet. If someone contain the katusha then the katusha is lowbrow. If the charyl is nonopening and the charyl attire the mattheus then the mattheus is dulcet. If someone is lowbrow then they need the charyl. The mattheus is not lowbrow.", "logic": "\nContain(jarvis, katusha)\nLowbrow(charyl)\nNonopening(katusha)\nDulcet(mattheus)\nforall x (Contain(x, katusha) -> Lowbrow(katusha))\nNonopening(charyl) and Attire(charyl, mattheus) -> Dulcet(mattheus)\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Streetwalk(x, charyl))\n\nnot Lowbrow(mattheus)\n\nnot Lowbrow(mattheus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "The benn mold the isidora. The merissa is jewelled. The isidora is endermic. The selie is initiatory. If someone mold the isidora then the isidora is jewelled. If the merissa is endermic and the merissa tape the selie then the selie is initiatory. If someone is jewelled then they need the merissa. The merissa is green.", "logic": "\nMold(benn, isidora)\nJewelled(merissa)\nEndermic(isidora)\nInitiatory(selie)\nforall x (Mold(x, isidora) -> Jewelled(isidora))\nEndermic(merissa) and Tape(merissa, selie) -> Initiatory(selie)\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Pleat(x, merissa))\n\nGreen(merissa)\n\nGreen(merissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-749"} {"premises": "Trey is parky. Trey is gastric. Trey is nuts. Raleigh is gastric. Raleigh is ulcerative. Raleigh is connected. Raleigh is nuts. Myrilla is parky. Myrilla is gastric. Myrilla is snaky. Myrilla is ulcerative. Myrilla is connected. Myrilla is nuts. Elwira is foetid. Elwira is nuts. Rough, parky people are ulcerative. All nuts people are gastric. Nice, nuts people are foetid. If someone is snaky then they are nuts. All parky people are foetid. If someone is ulcerative then they are nuts. Elwira is foetid.", "logic": "\nParky(trey)\nGastric(trey)\nNuts(trey)\nGastric(raleigh)\nUlcerative(raleigh)\nConnected(raleigh)\nNuts(raleigh)\nParky(myrilla)\nGastric(myrilla)\nSnaky(myrilla)\nUlcerative(myrilla)\nConnected(myrilla)\nNuts(myrilla)\nFoetid(elwira)\nNuts(elwira)\nforall x (Foetid(x) and Parky(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Parky(x) and Nuts(x) -> Foetid(x))\nforall x (Snaky(x) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Parky(x) -> Foetid(x))\nforall x (Ulcerative(x) -> Nuts(x))\n\nFoetid(elwira)\n\ntherefore Foetid(elwira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Rudiger is mohammedan. Rudiger is postmortem. Rudiger is ciliated. Donielle is postmortem. Donielle is wide. Donielle is svelte. Donielle is ciliated. Linea is mohammedan. Linea is postmortem. Linea is thunderous. Linea is wide. Linea is svelte. Linea is ciliated. Carla is leaded. Carla is ciliated. Rough, mohammedan people are wide. All ciliated people are postmortem. Nice, ciliated people are leaded. If someone is thunderous then they are ciliated. All mohammedan people are leaded. If someone is wide then they are ciliated. Donielle is not postmortem.", "logic": "\nMohammedan(rudiger)\nPostmortem(rudiger)\nCiliated(rudiger)\nPostmortem(donielle)\nWide(donielle)\nSvelte(donielle)\nCiliated(donielle)\nMohammedan(linea)\nPostmortem(linea)\nThunderous(linea)\nWide(linea)\nSvelte(linea)\nCiliated(linea)\nLeaded(carla)\nCiliated(carla)\nforall x (Leaded(x) and Mohammedan(x) -> Wide(x))\nforall x (Ciliated(x) -> Postmortem(x))\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) and Ciliated(x) -> Leaded(x))\nforall x (Thunderous(x) -> Ciliated(x))\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) -> Leaded(x))\nforall x (Wide(x) -> Ciliated(x))\n\nnot Postmortem(donielle)\n\ntherefore Postmortem(donielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Melody is bosomy. Melody is glistering. Melody is yemeni. Ellissa is glistering. Ellissa is anxiolytic. Ellissa is azonic. Ellissa is yemeni. Mignon is bosomy. Mignon is glistering. Mignon is impugnable. Mignon is anxiolytic. Mignon is azonic. Mignon is yemeni. Artur is springlike. Artur is yemeni. Rough, bosomy people are anxiolytic. All yemeni people are glistering. Nice, yemeni people are springlike. If someone is impugnable then they are yemeni. All bosomy people are springlike. If someone is anxiolytic then they are yemeni. Melody is springlike.", "logic": "\nBosomy(melody)\nGlistering(melody)\nYemeni(melody)\nGlistering(ellissa)\nAnxiolytic(ellissa)\nAzonic(ellissa)\nYemeni(ellissa)\nBosomy(mignon)\nGlistering(mignon)\nImpugnable(mignon)\nAnxiolytic(mignon)\nAzonic(mignon)\nYemeni(mignon)\nSpringlike(artur)\nYemeni(artur)\nforall x (Springlike(x) and Bosomy(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Yemeni(x) -> Glistering(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and Yemeni(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) -> Yemeni(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Yemeni(x))\n\nSpringlike(melody)\n\nBosomy(melody) and forall x (Bosomy(x) -> Springlike(x)) -> therefore Springlike(melody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Nichol is melanesian. Nichol is confusable. Nichol is extensive. June is confusable. June is dizygous. June is risen. June is extensive. Shaughn is melanesian. Shaughn is confusable. Shaughn is rightish. Shaughn is dizygous. Shaughn is risen. Shaughn is extensive. Bell is carbonic. Bell is extensive. Rough, melanesian people are dizygous. All extensive people are confusable. Nice, extensive people are carbonic. If someone is rightish then they are extensive. All melanesian people are carbonic. If someone is dizygous then they are extensive. Nichol is not carbonic.", "logic": "\nMelanesian(nichol)\nConfusable(nichol)\nExtensive(nichol)\nConfusable(june)\nDizygous(june)\nRisen(june)\nExtensive(june)\nMelanesian(shaughn)\nConfusable(shaughn)\nRightish(shaughn)\nDizygous(shaughn)\nRisen(shaughn)\nExtensive(shaughn)\nCarbonic(bell)\nExtensive(bell)\nforall x (Carbonic(x) and Melanesian(x) -> Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Confusable(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) and Extensive(x) -> Carbonic(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) -> Carbonic(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Extensive(x))\n\nnot Carbonic(nichol)\n\nMelanesian(nichol) and forall x (Melanesian(x) -> Carbonic(x)) -> therefore Carbonic(nichol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Ashli is afeard. Ashli is taciturn. Ashli is burled. Henriette is taciturn. Henriette is backstairs. Henriette is anterior. Henriette is burled. Darcey is afeard. Darcey is taciturn. Darcey is hectic. Darcey is backstairs. Darcey is anterior. Darcey is burled. Michelina is adherent. Michelina is burled. Rough, afeard people are backstairs. All burled people are taciturn. Nice, burled people are adherent. If someone is hectic then they are burled. All afeard people are adherent. If someone is backstairs then they are burled. Ashli is backstairs.", "logic": "\nAfeard(ashli)\nTaciturn(ashli)\nBurled(ashli)\nTaciturn(henriette)\nBackstairs(henriette)\nAnterior(henriette)\nBurled(henriette)\nAfeard(darcey)\nTaciturn(darcey)\nHectic(darcey)\nBackstairs(darcey)\nAnterior(darcey)\nBurled(darcey)\nAdherent(michelina)\nBurled(michelina)\nforall x (Adherent(x) and Afeard(x) -> Backstairs(x))\nforall x (Burled(x) -> Taciturn(x))\nforall x (Afeard(x) and Burled(x) -> Adherent(x))\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Burled(x))\nforall x (Afeard(x) -> Adherent(x))\nforall x (Backstairs(x) -> Burled(x))\n\nBackstairs(ashli)\n\nAfeard(ashli) and forall x (Afeard(x) -> Adherent(x)) -> therefore Adherent(ashli) Adherent(ashli) and Afeard(ashli) and forall x (Adherent(x) and Afeard(x) -> Backstairs(x)) -> therefore Backstairs(ashli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Nettie is unassured. Nettie is european. Nettie is audenesque. Darrel is european. Darrel is raisable. Darrel is crowned. Darrel is audenesque. Edy is unassured. Edy is european. Edy is congestive. Edy is raisable. Edy is crowned. Edy is audenesque. Honoria is racemose. Honoria is audenesque. Rough, unassured people are raisable. All audenesque people are european. Nice, audenesque people are racemose. If someone is congestive then they are audenesque. All unassured people are racemose. If someone is raisable then they are audenesque. Nettie is not raisable.", "logic": "\nUnassured(nettie)\nEuropean(nettie)\nAudenesque(nettie)\nEuropean(darrel)\nRaisable(darrel)\nCrowned(darrel)\nAudenesque(darrel)\nUnassured(edy)\nEuropean(edy)\nCongestive(edy)\nRaisable(edy)\nCrowned(edy)\nAudenesque(edy)\nRacemose(honoria)\nAudenesque(honoria)\nforall x (Racemose(x) and Unassured(x) -> Raisable(x))\nforall x (Audenesque(x) -> European(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) and Audenesque(x) -> Racemose(x))\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Audenesque(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Racemose(x))\nforall x (Raisable(x) -> Audenesque(x))\n\nnot Raisable(nettie)\n\nUnassured(nettie) and forall x (Unassured(x) -> Racemose(x)) -> therefore Racemose(nettie) Racemose(nettie) and Unassured(nettie) and forall x (Racemose(x) and Unassured(x) -> Raisable(x)) -> therefore Raisable(nettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Floyd is stray. Floyd is wireless. Floyd is achievable. Marsiella is wireless. Marsiella is universal. Marsiella is flightless. Marsiella is achievable. Kora is stray. Kora is wireless. Kora is waxlike. Kora is universal. Kora is flightless. Kora is achievable. Stephi is asphaltic. Stephi is achievable. Rough, stray people are universal. All achievable people are wireless. Nice, achievable people are asphaltic. If someone is waxlike then they are achievable. All stray people are asphaltic. If someone is universal then they are achievable. Marsiella is not asphaltic.", "logic": "\nStray(floyd)\nWireless(floyd)\nAchievable(floyd)\nWireless(marsiella)\nUniversal(marsiella)\nFlightless(marsiella)\nAchievable(marsiella)\nStray(kora)\nWireless(kora)\nWaxlike(kora)\nUniversal(kora)\nFlightless(kora)\nAchievable(kora)\nAsphaltic(stephi)\nAchievable(stephi)\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and Stray(x) -> Universal(x))\nforall x (Achievable(x) -> Wireless(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) and Achievable(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) -> Achievable(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Universal(x) -> Achievable(x))\n\nnot Asphaltic(marsiella)\n\nforall x (Stray(x) and Achievable(x) -> Asphaltic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Garnette is thwarting. Garnette is labored. Garnette is spinnable. Lorianna is labored. Lorianna is tactical. Lorianna is vacuolated. Lorianna is spinnable. Otho is thwarting. Otho is labored. Otho is nicaraguan. Otho is tactical. Otho is vacuolated. Otho is spinnable. Daryn is furthest. Daryn is spinnable. Rough, thwarting people are tactical. All spinnable people are labored. Nice, spinnable people are furthest. If someone is nicaraguan then they are spinnable. All thwarting people are furthest. If someone is tactical then they are spinnable. Daryn is tactical.", "logic": "\nThwarting(garnette)\nLabored(garnette)\nSpinnable(garnette)\nLabored(lorianna)\nTactical(lorianna)\nVacuolated(lorianna)\nSpinnable(lorianna)\nThwarting(otho)\nLabored(otho)\nNicaraguan(otho)\nTactical(otho)\nVacuolated(otho)\nSpinnable(otho)\nFurthest(daryn)\nSpinnable(daryn)\nforall x (Furthest(x) and Thwarting(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> Labored(x))\nforall x (Thwarting(x) and Spinnable(x) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Spinnable(x))\n\nTactical(daryn)\n\nforall x (Furthest(x) and Thwarting(x) -> Tactical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Sigfried is vegetal. Sigfried is blase. Sigfried is remarkable. Herold is blase. Herold is bilingual. Herold is native. Herold is remarkable. Ashlee is vegetal. Ashlee is blase. Ashlee is macho. Ashlee is bilingual. Ashlee is native. Ashlee is remarkable. Bonni is bats. Bonni is remarkable. Rough, vegetal people are bilingual. All remarkable people are blase. Nice, remarkable people are bats. If someone is macho then they are remarkable. All vegetal people are bats. If someone is bilingual then they are remarkable. Bonni is not vegetal.", "logic": "\nVegetal(sigfried)\nBlase(sigfried)\nRemarkable(sigfried)\nBlase(herold)\nBilingual(herold)\nNative(herold)\nRemarkable(herold)\nVegetal(ashlee)\nBlase(ashlee)\nMacho(ashlee)\nBilingual(ashlee)\nNative(ashlee)\nRemarkable(ashlee)\nBats(bonni)\nRemarkable(bonni)\nforall x (Bats(x) and Vegetal(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nforall x (Remarkable(x) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Vegetal(x) and Remarkable(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Macho(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Vegetal(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Bilingual(x) -> Remarkable(x))\n\nnot Vegetal(bonni)\n\nnot Vegetal(bonni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Quinta is anagogic. Quinta is slithery. Quinta is dashed. Maurice is slithery. Maurice is prone. Maurice is small. Maurice is dashed. Cathy is anagogic. Cathy is slithery. Cathy is captive. Cathy is prone. Cathy is small. Cathy is dashed. Kandace is heinous. Kandace is dashed. Rough, anagogic people are prone. All dashed people are slithery. Nice, dashed people are heinous. If someone is captive then they are dashed. All anagogic people are heinous. If someone is prone then they are dashed. Maurice is captive.", "logic": "\nAnagogic(quinta)\nSlithery(quinta)\nDashed(quinta)\nSlithery(maurice)\nProne(maurice)\nSmall(maurice)\nDashed(maurice)\nAnagogic(cathy)\nSlithery(cathy)\nCaptive(cathy)\nProne(cathy)\nSmall(cathy)\nDashed(cathy)\nHeinous(kandace)\nDashed(kandace)\nforall x (Heinous(x) and Anagogic(x) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Dashed(x) -> Heinous(x))\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Heinous(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Dashed(x))\n\nCaptive(maurice)\n\nCaptive(maurice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "See is nutritious. See is vulval. See is winless. Wilma is vulval. Wilma is molecular. Wilma is recurvate. Wilma is winless. Dorette is nutritious. Dorette is vulval. Dorette is ageless. Dorette is molecular. Dorette is recurvate. Dorette is winless. Margarita is polytonal. Margarita is winless. Rough, nutritious people are molecular. All winless people are vulval. Nice, winless people are polytonal. If someone is ageless then they are winless. All nutritious people are polytonal. If someone is molecular then they are winless. See is not recurvate.", "logic": "\nNutritious(see)\nVulval(see)\nWinless(see)\nVulval(wilma)\nMolecular(wilma)\nRecurvate(wilma)\nWinless(wilma)\nNutritious(dorette)\nVulval(dorette)\nAgeless(dorette)\nMolecular(dorette)\nRecurvate(dorette)\nWinless(dorette)\nPolytonal(margarita)\nWinless(margarita)\nforall x (Polytonal(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Molecular(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) -> Vulval(x))\nforall x (Nutritious(x) and Winless(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Nutritious(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Molecular(x) -> Winless(x))\n\nnot Recurvate(see)\n\nnot Recurvate(see) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Florance is homespun. Florance is mature. Florance is slovakian. Joann is mature. Joann is irruptive. Joann is fizzy. Joann is slovakian. Barb is homespun. Barb is mature. Barb is asexual. Barb is irruptive. Barb is fizzy. Barb is slovakian. Jessalin is impeccable. Jessalin is slovakian. Rough, homespun people are irruptive. All slovakian people are mature. Nice, slovakian people are impeccable. If someone is asexual then they are slovakian. All homespun people are impeccable. If someone is irruptive then they are slovakian. Jessalin is fizzy.", "logic": "\nHomespun(florance)\nMature(florance)\nSlovakian(florance)\nMature(joann)\nIrruptive(joann)\nFizzy(joann)\nSlovakian(joann)\nHomespun(barb)\nMature(barb)\nAsexual(barb)\nIrruptive(barb)\nFizzy(barb)\nSlovakian(barb)\nImpeccable(jessalin)\nSlovakian(jessalin)\nforall x (Impeccable(x) and Homespun(x) -> Irruptive(x))\nforall x (Slovakian(x) -> Mature(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) and Slovakian(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Asexual(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) -> Slovakian(x))\n\nFizzy(jessalin)\n\nFizzy(jessalin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1412"} {"premises": "Hirsch is thirteenth. Chicky is bowery. Enrique is medullated. If someone is medullated then they are bendable. Red, thirteenth people are bowery. Smart, bowery people are tapped. If someone is medullated then they are tapped. If Enrique is bowery then Enrique is thirteenth. Red people are fugitive. Enrique is medullated.", "logic": "\nThirteenth(hirsch)\nBowery(chicky)\nMedullated(enrique)\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Bendable(x))\nforall x (Bendable(x) and Thirteenth(x) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Bowery(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Tapped(x))\nBowery(enrique) -> Thirteenth(enrique)\nforall x (Bendable(x) -> Fugitive(x))\n\nMedullated(enrique)\n\ntherefore Medullated(enrique)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Clemens is successive. Winifred is huxleian. Jaclyn is catatonic. If someone is catatonic then they are unspecific. Red, successive people are huxleian. Smart, huxleian people are excusatory. If someone is catatonic then they are excusatory. If Jaclyn is huxleian then Jaclyn is successive. Red people are chemic. Jaclyn is not catatonic.", "logic": "\nSuccessive(clemens)\nHuxleian(winifred)\nCatatonic(jaclyn)\nforall x (Catatonic(x) -> Unspecific(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) and Successive(x) -> Huxleian(x))\nforall x (Continued(x) and Huxleian(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Catatonic(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nHuxleian(jaclyn) -> Successive(jaclyn)\nforall x (Unspecific(x) -> Chemic(x))\n\nnot Catatonic(jaclyn)\n\ntherefore Catatonic(jaclyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Carl is parametric. Jennee is sequined. Hamid is branchy. If someone is branchy then they are mythologic. Red, parametric people are sequined. Smart, sequined people are yeatsian. If someone is branchy then they are yeatsian. If Hamid is sequined then Hamid is parametric. Red people are flukey. Hamid is mythologic.", "logic": "\nParametric(carl)\nSequined(jennee)\nBranchy(hamid)\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Mythologic(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Parametric(x) -> Sequined(x))\nforall x (Cortical(x) and Sequined(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nSequined(hamid) -> Parametric(hamid)\nforall x (Mythologic(x) -> Flukey(x))\n\nMythologic(hamid)\n\nBranchy(hamid) and forall x (Branchy(x) -> Mythologic(x)) -> therefore Mythologic(hamid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Bella is teased. Gabbie is torn. Vinod is empiric. If someone is empiric then they are impelled. Red, teased people are torn. Smart, torn people are parrotlike. If someone is empiric then they are parrotlike. If Vinod is torn then Vinod is teased. Red people are melting. Vinod is not impelled.", "logic": "\nTeased(bella)\nTorn(gabbie)\nEmpiric(vinod)\nforall x (Empiric(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Impelled(x) and Teased(x) -> Torn(x))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Torn(x) -> Parrotlike(x))\nforall x (Empiric(x) -> Parrotlike(x))\nTorn(vinod) -> Teased(vinod)\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> Melting(x))\n\nnot Impelled(vinod)\n\nEmpiric(vinod) and forall x (Empiric(x) -> Impelled(x)) -> therefore Impelled(vinod)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Marchelle is gladsome. Bobbette is waggish. James is fistular. If someone is fistular then they are bobtailed. Red, gladsome people are waggish. Smart, waggish people are agonadal. If someone is fistular then they are agonadal. If James is waggish then James is gladsome. Red people are unschooled. James is unschooled.", "logic": "\nGladsome(marchelle)\nWaggish(bobbette)\nFistular(james)\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Bobtailed(x))\nforall x (Bobtailed(x) and Gladsome(x) -> Waggish(x))\nforall x (Appealable(x) and Waggish(x) -> Agonadal(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Agonadal(x))\nWaggish(james) -> Gladsome(james)\nforall x (Bobtailed(x) -> Unschooled(x))\n\nUnschooled(james)\n\nFistular(james) and forall x (Fistular(x) -> Bobtailed(x)) -> therefore Bobtailed(james) Bobtailed(james) and forall x (Bobtailed(x) -> Unschooled(x)) -> therefore Unschooled(james)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Quintilla is signed. Quintilla is stochastic. Nikoletta is unpromised. If someone is unpromised then they are unwritten. Red, signed people are stochastic. Smart, stochastic people are blame. If someone is unpromised then they are blame. If Nikoletta is stochastic then Nikoletta is signed. Red people are sororal. Nikoletta is not sororal.", "logic": "\nSigned(quintilla)\nStochastic(quintilla)\nUnpromised(nikoletta)\nforall x (Unpromised(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Unwritten(x) and Signed(x) -> Stochastic(x))\nforall x (Endemic(x) and Stochastic(x) -> Blame(x))\nforall x (Unpromised(x) -> Blame(x))\nStochastic(nikoletta) -> Signed(nikoletta)\nforall x (Unwritten(x) -> Sororal(x))\n\nnot Sororal(nikoletta)\n\nUnpromised(nikoletta) and forall x (Unpromised(x) -> Unwritten(x)) -> therefore Unwritten(nikoletta) Unwritten(nikoletta) and forall x (Unwritten(x) -> Sororal(x)) -> therefore Sororal(nikoletta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Henrietta is confirmed. Algernon is mauve. Shannen is snafu. If someone is snafu then they are spikelike. Red, confirmed people are mauve. Smart, mauve people are naive. If someone is snafu then they are naive. If Shannen is mauve then Shannen is confirmed. Red people are vague. Algernon is not naive.", "logic": "\nConfirmed(henrietta)\nMauve(algernon)\nSnafu(shannen)\nforall x (Snafu(x) -> Spikelike(x))\nforall x (Spikelike(x) and Confirmed(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Mauve(x) -> Naive(x))\nforall x (Snafu(x) -> Naive(x))\nMauve(shannen) -> Confirmed(shannen)\nforall x (Spikelike(x) -> Vague(x))\n\nnot Naive(algernon)\n\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Mauve(x) -> Naive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Sheri is deific. Pearle is sickish. Bonni is natty. If someone is natty then they are rich. Red, deific people are sickish. Smart, sickish people are damaged. If someone is natty then they are damaged. If Bonni is sickish then Bonni is deific. Red people are lusterless. Sheri is sickish.", "logic": "\nDeific(sheri)\nSickish(pearle)\nNatty(bonni)\nforall x (Natty(x) -> Rich(x))\nforall x (Rich(x) and Deific(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Precative(x) and Sickish(x) -> Damaged(x))\nforall x (Natty(x) -> Damaged(x))\nSickish(bonni) -> Deific(bonni)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Lusterless(x))\n\nSickish(sheri)\n\nforall x (Rich(x) and Deific(x) -> Sickish(x)) <- forall x (Natty(x) -> Rich(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Teressa is adactylous. Rasla is forehanded. Conan is ahead. If someone is ahead then they are creole. Red, adactylous people are forehanded. Smart, forehanded people are devout. If someone is ahead then they are devout. If Conan is forehanded then Conan is adactylous. Red people are extraneous. Teressa is not extraneous.", "logic": "\nAdactylous(teressa)\nForehanded(rasla)\nAhead(conan)\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> Creole(x))\nforall x (Creole(x) and Adactylous(x) -> Forehanded(x))\nforall x (Polished(x) and Forehanded(x) -> Devout(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> Devout(x))\nForehanded(conan) -> Adactylous(conan)\nforall x (Creole(x) -> Extraneous(x))\n\nnot Extraneous(teressa)\n\nforall x (Creole(x) -> Extraneous(x)) <- forall x (Ahead(x) -> Creole(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Sophie is lentissimo. Gunilla is takeout. Raina is abridged. If someone is abridged then they are bacteremic. Red, lentissimo people are takeout. Smart, takeout people are dentate. If someone is abridged then they are dentate. If Raina is takeout then Raina is lentissimo. Red people are swaggering. Sophie is chesty.", "logic": "\nLentissimo(sophie)\nTakeout(gunilla)\nAbridged(raina)\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Bacteremic(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) and Lentissimo(x) -> Takeout(x))\nforall x (Chesty(x) and Takeout(x) -> Dentate(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Dentate(x))\nTakeout(raina) -> Lentissimo(raina)\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) -> Swaggering(x))\n\nChesty(sophie)\n\nChesty(sophie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Sondra is pedantic. Zacharie is equatorial. Kenton is linnaean. If someone is linnaean then they are damned. Red, pedantic people are equatorial. Smart, equatorial people are enzymatic. If someone is linnaean then they are enzymatic. If Kenton is equatorial then Kenton is pedantic. Red people are desegrated. Sondra is not linnaean.", "logic": "\nPedantic(sondra)\nEquatorial(zacharie)\nLinnaean(kenton)\nforall x (Linnaean(x) -> Damned(x))\nforall x (Damned(x) and Pedantic(x) -> Equatorial(x))\nforall x (Droopy(x) and Equatorial(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Linnaean(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nEquatorial(kenton) -> Pedantic(kenton)\nforall x (Damned(x) -> Desegrated(x))\n\nnot Linnaean(sondra)\n\nnot Linnaean(sondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "Abdel is celluloid. Reggy is analgesic. Yancy is gentle. If someone is gentle then they are afeared. Red, celluloid people are analgesic. Smart, analgesic people are riskless. If someone is gentle then they are riskless. If Yancy is analgesic then Yancy is celluloid. Red people are mercenary. Yancy is skim.", "logic": "\nCelluloid(abdel)\nAnalgesic(reggy)\nGentle(yancy)\nforall x (Gentle(x) -> Afeared(x))\nforall x (Afeared(x) and Celluloid(x) -> Analgesic(x))\nforall x (Skim(x) and Analgesic(x) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Gentle(x) -> Riskless(x))\nAnalgesic(yancy) -> Celluloid(yancy)\nforall x (Afeared(x) -> Mercenary(x))\n\nSkim(yancy)\n\nSkim(yancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1140"} {"premises": "The jilly teethe the mindy. The jilly sweep the aileen. The jilly does not like the mindy. The jilly migrate the aileen. The jilly migrate the mindy. The aileen teethe the mindy. The aileen is not absorbed. The aileen sweep the jilly. The aileen does not like the mindy. The mindy migrate the aileen. If the jilly teethe the mindy then the mindy teethe the aileen. If something teethe the aileen then the aileen teethe the jilly. The aileen teethe the mindy.", "logic": "\nTeethe(jilly, mindy)\nSweep(jilly, aileen)\nnot Sweep(jilly, mindy)\nMigrate(jilly, aileen)\nMigrate(jilly, mindy)\nTeethe(aileen, mindy)\nnot Absorbed(aileen)\nSweep(aileen, jilly)\nnot Sweep(aileen, mindy)\nMigrate(mindy, aileen)\nTeethe(jilly, mindy) -> Teethe(mindy, aileen)\nforall x (Teethe(x, aileen) -> Teethe(aileen, jilly))\n\nTeethe(aileen, mindy)\n\ntherefore Teethe(aileen, mindy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The trever sunburn the kincaid. The trever dice the willie. The trever does not like the kincaid. The trever purse the willie. The trever purse the kincaid. The willie sunburn the kincaid. The willie is not adverbial. The willie dice the trever. The willie does not like the kincaid. The kincaid purse the willie. If the trever sunburn the kincaid then the kincaid sunburn the willie. If something sunburn the willie then the willie sunburn the trever. The trever does not chase the kincaid.", "logic": "\nSunburn(trever, kincaid)\nDice(trever, willie)\nnot Dice(trever, kincaid)\nPurse(trever, willie)\nPurse(trever, kincaid)\nSunburn(willie, kincaid)\nnot Adverbial(willie)\nDice(willie, trever)\nnot Dice(willie, kincaid)\nPurse(kincaid, willie)\nSunburn(trever, kincaid) -> Sunburn(kincaid, willie)\nforall x (Sunburn(x, willie) -> Sunburn(willie, trever))\n\nnot Sunburn(trever, kincaid)\n\ntherefore Sunburn(trever, kincaid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The mirilla outspan the lotty. The mirilla drawl the virgil. The mirilla does not like the lotty. The mirilla drudge the virgil. The mirilla drudge the lotty. The virgil outspan the lotty. The virgil is not ergotic. The virgil drawl the mirilla. The virgil does not like the lotty. The lotty drudge the virgil. If the mirilla outspan the lotty then the lotty outspan the virgil. If something outspan the virgil then the virgil outspan the mirilla. The lotty outspan the virgil.", "logic": "\nOutspan(mirilla, lotty)\nDrawl(mirilla, virgil)\nnot Drawl(mirilla, lotty)\nDrudge(mirilla, virgil)\nDrudge(mirilla, lotty)\nOutspan(virgil, lotty)\nnot Ergotic(virgil)\nDrawl(virgil, mirilla)\nnot Drawl(virgil, lotty)\nDrudge(lotty, virgil)\nOutspan(mirilla, lotty) -> Outspan(lotty, virgil)\nforall x (Outspan(x, virgil) -> Outspan(virgil, mirilla))\n\nOutspan(lotty, virgil)\n\nOutspan(mirilla, lotty) and Outspan(mirilla, lotty) -> Outspan(lotty, virgil) -> therefore Outspan(lotty, virgil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The esmeralda page the kingston. The esmeralda merit the luciana. The esmeralda does not like the kingston. The esmeralda stable the luciana. The esmeralda stable the kingston. The luciana page the kingston. The luciana is not epizoan. The luciana merit the esmeralda. The luciana does not like the kingston. The kingston stable the luciana. If the esmeralda page the kingston then the kingston page the luciana. If something page the luciana then the luciana page the esmeralda. The kingston does not chase the luciana.", "logic": "\nPage(esmeralda, kingston)\nMerit(esmeralda, luciana)\nnot Merit(esmeralda, kingston)\nStable(esmeralda, luciana)\nStable(esmeralda, kingston)\nPage(luciana, kingston)\nnot Epizoan(luciana)\nMerit(luciana, esmeralda)\nnot Merit(luciana, kingston)\nStable(kingston, luciana)\nPage(esmeralda, kingston) -> Page(kingston, luciana)\nforall x (Page(x, luciana) -> Page(luciana, esmeralda))\n\nnot Page(kingston, luciana)\n\nPage(esmeralda, kingston) and Page(esmeralda, kingston) -> Page(kingston, luciana) -> therefore Page(kingston, luciana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The denna moor the lionello. The denna decease the tommi. The denna does not like the lionello. The denna withdraw the tommi. The denna withdraw the lionello. The tommi moor the lionello. The tommi is not occupied. The tommi decease the denna. The tommi does not like the lionello. The lionello withdraw the tommi. If the denna moor the lionello then the lionello moor the tommi. If something moor the tommi then the tommi moor the denna. The tommi moor the denna.", "logic": "\nMoor(denna, lionello)\nDecease(denna, tommi)\nnot Decease(denna, lionello)\nWithdraw(denna, tommi)\nWithdraw(denna, lionello)\nMoor(tommi, lionello)\nnot Occupied(tommi)\nDecease(tommi, denna)\nnot Decease(tommi, lionello)\nWithdraw(lionello, tommi)\nMoor(denna, lionello) -> Moor(lionello, tommi)\nforall x (Moor(x, tommi) -> Moor(tommi, denna))\n\nMoor(tommi, denna)\n\nMoor(denna, lionello) and Moor(denna, lionello) -> Moor(lionello, tommi) -> therefore Moor(lionello, tommi) Moor(lionello, tommi) and forall x (Moor(x, tommi) -> Moor(tommi, denna)) -> therefore Moor(tommi, denna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The suzzy limit the lionello. The suzzy gloss the tierney. The suzzy does not like the lionello. The suzzy sonnet the tierney. The suzzy sonnet the lionello. The tierney limit the lionello. The tierney is not centesimal. The tierney gloss the suzzy. The tierney does not like the lionello. The lionello sonnet the tierney. If the suzzy limit the lionello then the lionello limit the tierney. If something limit the tierney then the tierney limit the suzzy. The tierney does not chase the suzzy.", "logic": "\nLimit(suzzy, lionello)\nGloss(suzzy, tierney)\nnot Gloss(suzzy, lionello)\nSonnet(suzzy, tierney)\nSonnet(suzzy, lionello)\nLimit(tierney, lionello)\nnot Centesimal(tierney)\nGloss(tierney, suzzy)\nnot Gloss(tierney, lionello)\nSonnet(lionello, tierney)\nLimit(suzzy, lionello) -> Limit(lionello, tierney)\nforall x (Limit(x, tierney) -> Limit(tierney, suzzy))\n\nnot Limit(tierney, suzzy)\n\nLimit(suzzy, lionello) and Limit(suzzy, lionello) -> Limit(lionello, tierney) -> therefore Limit(lionello, tierney) Limit(lionello, tierney) and forall x (Limit(x, tierney) -> Limit(tierney, suzzy)) -> therefore Limit(tierney, suzzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The corby gradate the elfreda. The corby lacerate the karilynn. The corby does not like the elfreda. The corby sanctify the karilynn. The corby sanctify the elfreda. The karilynn gradate the elfreda. The karilynn is not bolshevik. The karilynn lacerate the corby. The karilynn does not like the elfreda. The elfreda sanctify the karilynn. If the corby gradate the elfreda then the elfreda gradate the karilynn. If something gradate the karilynn then the karilynn gradate the corby. The corby is not young.", "logic": "\nGradate(corby, elfreda)\nLacerate(corby, karilynn)\nnot Lacerate(corby, elfreda)\nSanctify(corby, karilynn)\nSanctify(corby, elfreda)\nGradate(karilynn, elfreda)\nnot Bolshevik(karilynn)\nLacerate(karilynn, corby)\nnot Lacerate(karilynn, elfreda)\nSanctify(elfreda, karilynn)\nGradate(corby, elfreda) -> Gradate(elfreda, karilynn)\nforall x (Gradate(x, karilynn) -> Gradate(karilynn, corby))\n\nnot Young(corby)\n\nnot Young(corby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The deena thoriate the hans. The deena interrupt the penelopa. The deena does not like the hans. The deena unclasp the penelopa. The deena unclasp the hans. The penelopa thoriate the hans. The penelopa is not tabby. The penelopa interrupt the deena. The penelopa does not like the hans. The hans unclasp the penelopa. If the deena thoriate the hans then the hans thoriate the penelopa. If something thoriate the penelopa then the penelopa thoriate the deena. The hans interrupt the penelopa.", "logic": "\nThoriate(deena, hans)\nInterrupt(deena, penelopa)\nnot Interrupt(deena, hans)\nUnclasp(deena, penelopa)\nUnclasp(deena, hans)\nThoriate(penelopa, hans)\nnot Tabby(penelopa)\nInterrupt(penelopa, deena)\nnot Interrupt(penelopa, hans)\nUnclasp(hans, penelopa)\nThoriate(deena, hans) -> Thoriate(hans, penelopa)\nforall x (Thoriate(x, penelopa) -> Thoriate(penelopa, deena))\n\nInterrupt(hans, penelopa)\n\nInterrupt(hans, penelopa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The brena kvetch the nertie. The brena backstop the wayland. The brena does not like the nertie. The brena iterate the wayland. The brena iterate the nertie. The wayland kvetch the nertie. The wayland is not worried. The wayland backstop the brena. The wayland does not like the nertie. The nertie iterate the wayland. If the brena kvetch the nertie then the nertie kvetch the wayland. If something kvetch the wayland then the wayland kvetch the brena. The nertie does not chase the nertie.", "logic": "\nKvetch(brena, nertie)\nBackstop(brena, wayland)\nnot Backstop(brena, nertie)\nIterate(brena, wayland)\nIterate(brena, nertie)\nKvetch(wayland, nertie)\nnot Worried(wayland)\nBackstop(wayland, brena)\nnot Backstop(wayland, nertie)\nIterate(nertie, wayland)\nKvetch(brena, nertie) -> Kvetch(nertie, wayland)\nforall x (Kvetch(x, wayland) -> Kvetch(wayland, brena))\n\nnot Kvetch(nertie, nertie)\n\nnot Kvetch(nertie, nertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The debbie homogenise the yolande. The debbie declaw the deina. The debbie does not like the yolande. The debbie chastise the deina. The debbie chastise the yolande. The deina homogenise the yolande. The deina is not marvelous. The deina declaw the debbie. The deina does not like the yolande. The yolande chastise the deina. If the debbie homogenise the yolande then the yolande homogenise the deina. If something homogenise the deina then the deina homogenise the debbie. The deina is cold.", "logic": "\nHomogenise(debbie, yolande)\nDeclaw(debbie, deina)\nnot Declaw(debbie, yolande)\nChastise(debbie, deina)\nChastise(debbie, yolande)\nHomogenise(deina, yolande)\nnot Marvelous(deina)\nDeclaw(deina, debbie)\nnot Declaw(deina, yolande)\nChastise(yolande, deina)\nHomogenise(debbie, yolande) -> Homogenise(yolande, deina)\nforall x (Homogenise(x, deina) -> Homogenise(deina, debbie))\n\nCold(deina)\n\nCold(deina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The bidget discipline the zachariah. The bidget oversupply the wyatan. The bidget does not like the zachariah. The bidget flour the wyatan. The bidget flour the zachariah. The wyatan discipline the zachariah. The wyatan is not acerate. The wyatan oversupply the bidget. The wyatan does not like the zachariah. The zachariah flour the wyatan. If the bidget discipline the zachariah then the zachariah discipline the wyatan. If something discipline the wyatan then the wyatan discipline the bidget. The wyatan does not need the zachariah.", "logic": "\nDiscipline(bidget, zachariah)\nOversupply(bidget, wyatan)\nnot Oversupply(bidget, zachariah)\nFlour(bidget, wyatan)\nFlour(bidget, zachariah)\nDiscipline(wyatan, zachariah)\nnot Acerate(wyatan)\nOversupply(wyatan, bidget)\nnot Oversupply(wyatan, zachariah)\nFlour(zachariah, wyatan)\nDiscipline(bidget, zachariah) -> Discipline(zachariah, wyatan)\nforall x (Discipline(x, wyatan) -> Discipline(wyatan, bidget))\n\nnot Flour(wyatan, zachariah)\n\nnot Flour(wyatan, zachariah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The charline aromatise the katti. The charline ruff the wileen. The charline does not like the katti. The charline repudiate the wileen. The charline repudiate the katti. The wileen aromatise the katti. The wileen is not typical. The wileen ruff the charline. The wileen does not like the katti. The katti repudiate the wileen. If the charline aromatise the katti then the katti aromatise the wileen. If something aromatise the wileen then the wileen aromatise the charline. The katti is green.", "logic": "\nAromatise(charline, katti)\nRuff(charline, wileen)\nnot Ruff(charline, katti)\nRepudiate(charline, wileen)\nRepudiate(charline, katti)\nAromatise(wileen, katti)\nnot Typical(wileen)\nRuff(wileen, charline)\nnot Ruff(wileen, katti)\nRepudiate(katti, wileen)\nAromatise(charline, katti) -> Aromatise(katti, wileen)\nforall x (Aromatise(x, wileen) -> Aromatise(wileen, charline))\n\nGreen(katti)\n\nGreen(katti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-635"} {"premises": "The carol immolate the giles. The carol absorb the candice. The candice is treeless. The candice immolate the carol. The candice absorb the giles. The giles immolate the candice. The giles confirm the candice. The giles absorb the candice. The zoe is honduran. The zoe is tinkly. The zoe confirm the carol. The zoe absorb the carol. If someone absorb the carol then the carol confirm the candice. If someone absorb the candice and the candice confirm the carol then the candice immolate the zoe. If someone immolate the carol and the carol confirm the giles then the carol immolate the candice. If someone confirm the zoe and the zoe immolate the giles then the zoe is honduran. If the candice absorb the carol and the candice absorb the zoe then the carol absorb the zoe. If someone absorb the zoe and they like the carol then the carol is treeless. If someone is sinhalese then they see the candice. If someone is treeless and they like the carol then they see the zoe. The zoe confirm the carol.", "logic": "\nImmolate(carol, giles)\nAbsorb(carol, candice)\nTreeless(candice)\nImmolate(candice, carol)\nAbsorb(candice, giles)\nImmolate(giles, candice)\nConfirm(giles, candice)\nAbsorb(giles, candice)\nHonduran(zoe)\nTinkly(zoe)\nConfirm(zoe, carol)\nAbsorb(zoe, carol)\nforall x (Absorb(x, carol) -> Confirm(carol, candice))\nforall x (Absorb(x, candice) and Confirm(candice, carol) -> Immolate(candice, zoe))\nforall x (Immolate(x, carol) and Confirm(carol, giles) -> Immolate(carol, candice))\nforall x (Confirm(x, zoe) and Immolate(zoe, giles) -> Honduran(zoe))\nAbsorb(candice, carol) and Absorb(candice, zoe) -> Absorb(carol, zoe)\nforall x (Absorb(x, zoe) and Immolate(x, carol) -> Treeless(carol))\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) -> Absorb(x, candice))\nforall x (Treeless(x) and Immolate(x, carol) -> Absorb(x, zoe))\n\nConfirm(zoe, carol)\n\ntherefore Confirm(zoe, carol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The kylynn juxtapose the claretta. The kylynn calcine the tyrus. The tyrus is onerous. The tyrus juxtapose the kylynn. The tyrus calcine the claretta. The claretta juxtapose the tyrus. The claretta recognise the tyrus. The claretta calcine the tyrus. The germana is initiatory. The germana is fresh. The germana recognise the kylynn. The germana calcine the kylynn. If someone calcine the kylynn then the kylynn recognise the tyrus. If someone calcine the tyrus and the tyrus recognise the kylynn then the tyrus juxtapose the germana. If someone juxtapose the kylynn and the kylynn recognise the claretta then the kylynn juxtapose the tyrus. If someone recognise the germana and the germana juxtapose the claretta then the germana is initiatory. If the tyrus calcine the kylynn and the tyrus calcine the germana then the kylynn calcine the germana. If someone calcine the germana and they like the kylynn then the kylynn is onerous. If someone is wieldy then they see the tyrus. If someone is onerous and they like the kylynn then they see the germana. The germana does not need the kylynn.", "logic": "\nJuxtapose(kylynn, claretta)\nCalcine(kylynn, tyrus)\nOnerous(tyrus)\nJuxtapose(tyrus, kylynn)\nCalcine(tyrus, claretta)\nJuxtapose(claretta, tyrus)\nRecognise(claretta, tyrus)\nCalcine(claretta, tyrus)\nInitiatory(germana)\nFresh(germana)\nRecognise(germana, kylynn)\nCalcine(germana, kylynn)\nforall x (Calcine(x, kylynn) -> Recognise(kylynn, tyrus))\nforall x (Calcine(x, tyrus) and Recognise(tyrus, kylynn) -> Juxtapose(tyrus, germana))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, kylynn) and Recognise(kylynn, claretta) -> Juxtapose(kylynn, tyrus))\nforall x (Recognise(x, germana) and Juxtapose(germana, claretta) -> Initiatory(germana))\nCalcine(tyrus, kylynn) and Calcine(tyrus, germana) -> Calcine(kylynn, germana)\nforall x (Calcine(x, germana) and Juxtapose(x, kylynn) -> Onerous(kylynn))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) -> Calcine(x, tyrus))\nforall x (Onerous(x) and Juxtapose(x, kylynn) -> Calcine(x, germana))\n\nnot Recognise(germana, kylynn)\n\ntherefore Recognise(germana, kylynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The peggi poke the wilburt. The peggi bead the dara. The dara is heatable. The dara poke the peggi. The dara bead the wilburt. The wilburt poke the dara. The wilburt perforate the dara. The wilburt bead the dara. The gaston is soulful. The gaston is elusive. The gaston perforate the peggi. The gaston bead the peggi. If someone bead the peggi then the peggi perforate the dara. If someone bead the dara and the dara perforate the peggi then the dara poke the gaston. If someone poke the peggi and the peggi perforate the wilburt then the peggi poke the dara. If someone perforate the gaston and the gaston poke the wilburt then the gaston is soulful. If the dara bead the peggi and the dara bead the gaston then the peggi bead the gaston. If someone bead the gaston and they like the peggi then the peggi is heatable. If someone is uncomplete then they see the dara. If someone is heatable and they like the peggi then they see the gaston. The dara bead the gaston.", "logic": "\nPoke(peggi, wilburt)\nBead(peggi, dara)\nHeatable(dara)\nPoke(dara, peggi)\nBead(dara, wilburt)\nPoke(wilburt, dara)\nPerforate(wilburt, dara)\nBead(wilburt, dara)\nSoulful(gaston)\nElusive(gaston)\nPerforate(gaston, peggi)\nBead(gaston, peggi)\nforall x (Bead(x, peggi) -> Perforate(peggi, dara))\nforall x (Bead(x, dara) and Perforate(dara, peggi) -> Poke(dara, gaston))\nforall x (Poke(x, peggi) and Perforate(peggi, wilburt) -> Poke(peggi, dara))\nforall x (Perforate(x, gaston) and Poke(gaston, wilburt) -> Soulful(gaston))\nBead(dara, peggi) and Bead(dara, gaston) -> Bead(peggi, gaston)\nforall x (Bead(x, gaston) and Poke(x, peggi) -> Heatable(peggi))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Bead(x, dara))\nforall x (Heatable(x) and Poke(x, peggi) -> Bead(x, gaston))\n\nBead(dara, gaston)\n\nHeatable(dara) and Poke(dara, peggi) and forall x (Heatable(x) and Poke(x, peggi) -> Bead(x, gaston)) -> therefore Bead(dara, gaston)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The corine omen the rochette. The corine declare the brant. The brant is melting. The brant omen the corine. The brant declare the rochette. The rochette omen the brant. The rochette move the brant. The rochette declare the brant. The rivalee is leechlike. The rivalee is unfit. The rivalee move the corine. The rivalee declare the corine. If someone declare the corine then the corine move the brant. If someone declare the brant and the brant move the corine then the brant omen the rivalee. If someone omen the corine and the corine move the rochette then the corine omen the brant. If someone move the rivalee and the rivalee omen the rochette then the rivalee is leechlike. If the brant declare the corine and the brant declare the rivalee then the corine declare the rivalee. If someone declare the rivalee and they like the corine then the corine is melting. If someone is inflexible then they see the brant. If someone is melting and they like the corine then they see the rivalee. The corine does not need the brant.", "logic": "\nOmen(corine, rochette)\nDeclare(corine, brant)\nMelting(brant)\nOmen(brant, corine)\nDeclare(brant, rochette)\nOmen(rochette, brant)\nMove(rochette, brant)\nDeclare(rochette, brant)\nLeechlike(rivalee)\nUnfit(rivalee)\nMove(rivalee, corine)\nDeclare(rivalee, corine)\nforall x (Declare(x, corine) -> Move(corine, brant))\nforall x (Declare(x, brant) and Move(brant, corine) -> Omen(brant, rivalee))\nforall x (Omen(x, corine) and Move(corine, rochette) -> Omen(corine, brant))\nforall x (Move(x, rivalee) and Omen(rivalee, rochette) -> Leechlike(rivalee))\nDeclare(brant, corine) and Declare(brant, rivalee) -> Declare(corine, rivalee)\nforall x (Declare(x, rivalee) and Omen(x, corine) -> Melting(corine))\nforall x (Inflexible(x) -> Declare(x, brant))\nforall x (Melting(x) and Omen(x, corine) -> Declare(x, rivalee))\n\nnot Move(corine, brant)\n\nDeclare(rivalee, corine) and forall x (Declare(x, corine) -> Move(corine, brant)) -> therefore Move(corine, brant)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The gardner hitch the kanya. The gardner implode the hanni. The hanni is montane. The hanni hitch the gardner. The hanni implode the kanya. The kanya hitch the hanni. The kanya epoxy the hanni. The kanya implode the hanni. The moyna is idolized. The moyna is nervous. The moyna epoxy the gardner. The moyna implode the gardner. If someone implode the gardner then the gardner epoxy the hanni. If someone implode the hanni and the hanni epoxy the gardner then the hanni hitch the moyna. If someone hitch the gardner and the gardner epoxy the kanya then the gardner hitch the hanni. If someone epoxy the moyna and the moyna hitch the kanya then the moyna is idolized. If the hanni implode the gardner and the hanni implode the moyna then the gardner implode the moyna. If someone implode the moyna and they like the gardner then the gardner is montane. If someone is gymnastic then they see the hanni. If someone is montane and they like the gardner then they see the moyna. The gardner is montane.", "logic": "\nHitch(gardner, kanya)\nImplode(gardner, hanni)\nMontane(hanni)\nHitch(hanni, gardner)\nImplode(hanni, kanya)\nHitch(kanya, hanni)\nEpoxy(kanya, hanni)\nImplode(kanya, hanni)\nIdolized(moyna)\nNervous(moyna)\nEpoxy(moyna, gardner)\nImplode(moyna, gardner)\nforall x (Implode(x, gardner) -> Epoxy(gardner, hanni))\nforall x (Implode(x, hanni) and Epoxy(hanni, gardner) -> Hitch(hanni, moyna))\nforall x (Hitch(x, gardner) and Epoxy(gardner, kanya) -> Hitch(gardner, hanni))\nforall x (Epoxy(x, moyna) and Hitch(moyna, kanya) -> Idolized(moyna))\nImplode(hanni, gardner) and Implode(hanni, moyna) -> Implode(gardner, moyna)\nforall x (Implode(x, moyna) and Hitch(x, gardner) -> Montane(gardner))\nforall x (Gymnastic(x) -> Implode(x, hanni))\nforall x (Montane(x) and Hitch(x, gardner) -> Implode(x, moyna))\n\nMontane(gardner)\n\nMontane(hanni) and Hitch(hanni, gardner) and forall x (Montane(x) and Hitch(x, gardner) -> Implode(x, moyna)) -> therefore Implode(hanni, moyna) Implode(hanni, moyna) and Hitch(hanni, gardner) and forall x (Implode(x, moyna) and Hitch(x, gardner) -> Montane(gardner)) -> therefore Montane(gardner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The charla charm the marcello. The charla summon the townie. The townie is bounden. The townie charm the charla. The townie summon the marcello. The marcello charm the townie. The marcello drowse the townie. The marcello summon the townie. The kip is radiating. The kip is paperback. The kip drowse the charla. The kip summon the charla. If someone summon the charla then the charla drowse the townie. If someone summon the townie and the townie drowse the charla then the townie charm the kip. If someone charm the charla and the charla drowse the marcello then the charla charm the townie. If someone drowse the kip and the kip charm the marcello then the kip is radiating. If the townie summon the charla and the townie summon the kip then the charla summon the kip. If someone summon the kip and they like the charla then the charla is bounden. If someone is spiderly then they see the townie. If someone is bounden and they like the charla then they see the kip. The charla is not bounden.", "logic": "\nCharm(charla, marcello)\nSummon(charla, townie)\nBounden(townie)\nCharm(townie, charla)\nSummon(townie, marcello)\nCharm(marcello, townie)\nDrowse(marcello, townie)\nSummon(marcello, townie)\nRadiating(kip)\nPaperback(kip)\nDrowse(kip, charla)\nSummon(kip, charla)\nforall x (Summon(x, charla) -> Drowse(charla, townie))\nforall x (Summon(x, townie) and Drowse(townie, charla) -> Charm(townie, kip))\nforall x (Charm(x, charla) and Drowse(charla, marcello) -> Charm(charla, townie))\nforall x (Drowse(x, kip) and Charm(kip, marcello) -> Radiating(kip))\nSummon(townie, charla) and Summon(townie, kip) -> Summon(charla, kip)\nforall x (Summon(x, kip) and Charm(x, charla) -> Bounden(charla))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Summon(x, townie))\nforall x (Bounden(x) and Charm(x, charla) -> Summon(x, kip))\n\nnot Bounden(charla)\n\nBounden(townie) and Charm(townie, charla) and forall x (Bounden(x) and Charm(x, charla) -> Summon(x, kip)) -> therefore Summon(townie, kip) Summon(townie, kip) and Charm(townie, charla) and forall x (Summon(x, kip) and Charm(x, charla) -> Bounden(charla)) -> therefore Bounden(charla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The vivianna slave the turner. The vivianna fettle the darwin. The darwin is must. The darwin slave the vivianna. The darwin fettle the turner. The turner slave the darwin. The turner unstaple the darwin. The turner fettle the darwin. The zacharias is adjuratory. The zacharias is empirical. The zacharias unstaple the vivianna. The zacharias fettle the vivianna. If someone fettle the vivianna then the vivianna unstaple the darwin. If someone fettle the darwin and the darwin unstaple the vivianna then the darwin slave the zacharias. If someone slave the vivianna and the vivianna unstaple the turner then the vivianna slave the darwin. If someone unstaple the zacharias and the zacharias slave the turner then the zacharias is adjuratory. If the darwin fettle the vivianna and the darwin fettle the zacharias then the vivianna fettle the zacharias. If someone fettle the zacharias and they like the vivianna then the vivianna is must. If someone is parochial then they see the darwin. If someone is must and they like the vivianna then they see the zacharias. The zacharias does not see the zacharias.", "logic": "\nSlave(vivianna, turner)\nFettle(vivianna, darwin)\nMust(darwin)\nSlave(darwin, vivianna)\nFettle(darwin, turner)\nSlave(turner, darwin)\nUnstaple(turner, darwin)\nFettle(turner, darwin)\nAdjuratory(zacharias)\nEmpirical(zacharias)\nUnstaple(zacharias, vivianna)\nFettle(zacharias, vivianna)\nforall x (Fettle(x, vivianna) -> Unstaple(vivianna, darwin))\nforall x (Fettle(x, darwin) and Unstaple(darwin, vivianna) -> Slave(darwin, zacharias))\nforall x (Slave(x, vivianna) and Unstaple(vivianna, turner) -> Slave(vivianna, darwin))\nforall x (Unstaple(x, zacharias) and Slave(zacharias, turner) -> Adjuratory(zacharias))\nFettle(darwin, vivianna) and Fettle(darwin, zacharias) -> Fettle(vivianna, zacharias)\nforall x (Fettle(x, zacharias) and Slave(x, vivianna) -> Must(vivianna))\nforall x (Parochial(x) -> Fettle(x, darwin))\nforall x (Must(x) and Slave(x, vivianna) -> Fettle(x, zacharias))\n\nnot Fettle(zacharias, zacharias)\n\nforall x (Must(x) and Slave(x, vivianna) -> Fettle(x, zacharias)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The berte hire the mathilde. The berte calcine the angil. The angil is powerful. The angil hire the berte. The angil calcine the mathilde. The mathilde hire the angil. The mathilde sightsing the angil. The mathilde calcine the angil. The morty is hygienic. The morty is curvaceous. The morty sightsing the berte. The morty calcine the berte. If someone calcine the berte then the berte sightsing the angil. If someone calcine the angil and the angil sightsing the berte then the angil hire the morty. If someone hire the berte and the berte sightsing the mathilde then the berte hire the angil. If someone sightsing the morty and the morty hire the mathilde then the morty is hygienic. If the angil calcine the berte and the angil calcine the morty then the berte calcine the morty. If someone calcine the morty and they like the berte then the berte is powerful. If someone is propertied then they see the angil. If someone is powerful and they like the berte then they see the morty. The angil hire the morty.", "logic": "\nHire(berte, mathilde)\nCalcine(berte, angil)\nPowerful(angil)\nHire(angil, berte)\nCalcine(angil, mathilde)\nHire(mathilde, angil)\nSightsing(mathilde, angil)\nCalcine(mathilde, angil)\nHygienic(morty)\nCurvaceous(morty)\nSightsing(morty, berte)\nCalcine(morty, berte)\nforall x (Calcine(x, berte) -> Sightsing(berte, angil))\nforall x (Calcine(x, angil) and Sightsing(angil, berte) -> Hire(angil, morty))\nforall x (Hire(x, berte) and Sightsing(berte, mathilde) -> Hire(berte, angil))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, morty) and Hire(morty, mathilde) -> Hygienic(morty))\nCalcine(angil, berte) and Calcine(angil, morty) -> Calcine(berte, morty)\nforall x (Calcine(x, morty) and Hire(x, berte) -> Powerful(berte))\nforall x (Propertied(x) -> Calcine(x, angil))\nforall x (Powerful(x) and Hire(x, berte) -> Calcine(x, morty))\n\nHire(angil, morty)\n\nforall x (Calcine(x, angil) and Sightsing(angil, berte) -> Hire(angil, morty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The kylynn sedate the melodie. The kylynn nictitate the adey. The adey is bobtailed. The adey sedate the kylynn. The adey nictitate the melodie. The melodie sedate the adey. The melodie repaint the adey. The melodie nictitate the adey. The blondy is consuming. The blondy is gracious. The blondy repaint the kylynn. The blondy nictitate the kylynn. If someone nictitate the kylynn then the kylynn repaint the adey. If someone nictitate the adey and the adey repaint the kylynn then the adey sedate the blondy. If someone sedate the kylynn and the kylynn repaint the melodie then the kylynn sedate the adey. If someone repaint the blondy and the blondy sedate the melodie then the blondy is consuming. If the adey nictitate the kylynn and the adey nictitate the blondy then the kylynn nictitate the blondy. If someone nictitate the blondy and they like the kylynn then the kylynn is bobtailed. If someone is worst then they see the adey. If someone is bobtailed and they like the kylynn then they see the blondy. The adey does not see the adey.", "logic": "\nSedate(kylynn, melodie)\nNictitate(kylynn, adey)\nBobtailed(adey)\nSedate(adey, kylynn)\nNictitate(adey, melodie)\nSedate(melodie, adey)\nRepaint(melodie, adey)\nNictitate(melodie, adey)\nConsuming(blondy)\nGracious(blondy)\nRepaint(blondy, kylynn)\nNictitate(blondy, kylynn)\nforall x (Nictitate(x, kylynn) -> Repaint(kylynn, adey))\nforall x (Nictitate(x, adey) and Repaint(adey, kylynn) -> Sedate(adey, blondy))\nforall x (Sedate(x, kylynn) and Repaint(kylynn, melodie) -> Sedate(kylynn, adey))\nforall x (Repaint(x, blondy) and Sedate(blondy, melodie) -> Consuming(blondy))\nNictitate(adey, kylynn) and Nictitate(adey, blondy) -> Nictitate(kylynn, blondy)\nforall x (Nictitate(x, blondy) and Sedate(x, kylynn) -> Bobtailed(kylynn))\nforall x (Worst(x) -> Nictitate(x, adey))\nforall x (Bobtailed(x) and Sedate(x, kylynn) -> Nictitate(x, blondy))\n\nnot Nictitate(adey, adey)\n\nforall x (Worst(x) -> Nictitate(x, adey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The chev empathise the larry. The chev treble the abra. The abra is liliaceous. The abra empathise the chev. The abra treble the larry. The larry empathise the abra. The larry shear the abra. The larry treble the abra. The molli is agog. The molli is rocky. The molli shear the chev. The molli treble the chev. If someone treble the chev then the chev shear the abra. If someone treble the abra and the abra shear the chev then the abra empathise the molli. If someone empathise the chev and the chev shear the larry then the chev empathise the abra. If someone shear the molli and the molli empathise the larry then the molli is agog. If the abra treble the chev and the abra treble the molli then the chev treble the molli. If someone treble the molli and they like the chev then the chev is liliaceous. If someone is bipartisan then they see the abra. If someone is liliaceous and they like the chev then they see the molli. The larry is bipartisan.", "logic": "\nEmpathise(chev, larry)\nTreble(chev, abra)\nLiliaceous(abra)\nEmpathise(abra, chev)\nTreble(abra, larry)\nEmpathise(larry, abra)\nShear(larry, abra)\nTreble(larry, abra)\nAgog(molli)\nRocky(molli)\nShear(molli, chev)\nTreble(molli, chev)\nforall x (Treble(x, chev) -> Shear(chev, abra))\nforall x (Treble(x, abra) and Shear(abra, chev) -> Empathise(abra, molli))\nforall x (Empathise(x, chev) and Shear(chev, larry) -> Empathise(chev, abra))\nforall x (Shear(x, molli) and Empathise(molli, larry) -> Agog(molli))\nTreble(abra, chev) and Treble(abra, molli) -> Treble(chev, molli)\nforall x (Treble(x, molli) and Empathise(x, chev) -> Liliaceous(chev))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Treble(x, abra))\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) and Empathise(x, chev) -> Treble(x, molli))\n\nBipartisan(larry)\n\nBipartisan(larry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The ulrich unclog the kelcie. The ulrich bask the arden. The arden is congruous. The arden unclog the ulrich. The arden bask the kelcie. The kelcie unclog the arden. The kelcie brood the arden. The kelcie bask the arden. The claude is treacly. The claude is appointed. The claude brood the ulrich. The claude bask the ulrich. If someone bask the ulrich then the ulrich brood the arden. If someone bask the arden and the arden brood the ulrich then the arden unclog the claude. If someone unclog the ulrich and the ulrich brood the kelcie then the ulrich unclog the arden. If someone brood the claude and the claude unclog the kelcie then the claude is treacly. If the arden bask the ulrich and the arden bask the claude then the ulrich bask the claude. If someone bask the claude and they like the ulrich then the ulrich is congruous. If someone is nonlinear then they see the arden. If someone is congruous and they like the ulrich then they see the claude. The ulrich does not need the kelcie.", "logic": "\nUnclog(ulrich, kelcie)\nBask(ulrich, arden)\nCongruous(arden)\nUnclog(arden, ulrich)\nBask(arden, kelcie)\nUnclog(kelcie, arden)\nBrood(kelcie, arden)\nBask(kelcie, arden)\nTreacly(claude)\nAppointed(claude)\nBrood(claude, ulrich)\nBask(claude, ulrich)\nforall x (Bask(x, ulrich) -> Brood(ulrich, arden))\nforall x (Bask(x, arden) and Brood(arden, ulrich) -> Unclog(arden, claude))\nforall x (Unclog(x, ulrich) and Brood(ulrich, kelcie) -> Unclog(ulrich, arden))\nforall x (Brood(x, claude) and Unclog(claude, kelcie) -> Treacly(claude))\nBask(arden, ulrich) and Bask(arden, claude) -> Bask(ulrich, claude)\nforall x (Bask(x, claude) and Unclog(x, ulrich) -> Congruous(ulrich))\nforall x (Nonlinear(x) -> Bask(x, arden))\nforall x (Congruous(x) and Unclog(x, ulrich) -> Bask(x, claude))\n\nnot Brood(ulrich, kelcie)\n\nnot Brood(ulrich, kelcie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The silvio frivol the erhard. The silvio mitigate the cati. The cati is insensible. The cati frivol the silvio. The cati mitigate the erhard. The erhard frivol the cati. The erhard divagate the cati. The erhard mitigate the cati. The dabney is monthlong. The dabney is unconfused. The dabney divagate the silvio. The dabney mitigate the silvio. If someone mitigate the silvio then the silvio divagate the cati. If someone mitigate the cati and the cati divagate the silvio then the cati frivol the dabney. If someone frivol the silvio and the silvio divagate the erhard then the silvio frivol the cati. If someone divagate the dabney and the dabney frivol the erhard then the dabney is monthlong. If the cati mitigate the silvio and the cati mitigate the dabney then the silvio mitigate the dabney. If someone mitigate the dabney and they like the silvio then the silvio is insensible. If someone is syphilitic then they see the cati. If someone is insensible and they like the silvio then they see the dabney. The cati divagate the erhard.", "logic": "\nFrivol(silvio, erhard)\nMitigate(silvio, cati)\nInsensible(cati)\nFrivol(cati, silvio)\nMitigate(cati, erhard)\nFrivol(erhard, cati)\nDivagate(erhard, cati)\nMitigate(erhard, cati)\nMonthlong(dabney)\nUnconfused(dabney)\nDivagate(dabney, silvio)\nMitigate(dabney, silvio)\nforall x (Mitigate(x, silvio) -> Divagate(silvio, cati))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, cati) and Divagate(cati, silvio) -> Frivol(cati, dabney))\nforall x (Frivol(x, silvio) and Divagate(silvio, erhard) -> Frivol(silvio, cati))\nforall x (Divagate(x, dabney) and Frivol(dabney, erhard) -> Monthlong(dabney))\nMitigate(cati, silvio) and Mitigate(cati, dabney) -> Mitigate(silvio, dabney)\nforall x (Mitigate(x, dabney) and Frivol(x, silvio) -> Insensible(silvio))\nforall x (Syphilitic(x) -> Mitigate(x, cati))\nforall x (Insensible(x) and Frivol(x, silvio) -> Mitigate(x, dabney))\n\nDivagate(cati, erhard)\n\nDivagate(cati, erhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-785"} {"premises": "The veriee is jolly. The veriee ensile the kurt. The veriee ensile the vivianna. The veriee clamber the kurt. The veriee carbonate the kurt. The veriee carbonate the vivianna. The kurt is jolly. The kurt ensile the veriee. The kurt ensile the vivianna. The kurt does not need the veriee. The kurt carbonate the vivianna. The vivianna is flavorless. The vivianna is loud. The vivianna ensile the veriee. The vivianna clamber the veriee. If someone ensile the veriee and the veriee carbonate the kurt then they visit the kurt. If someone carbonate the kurt and they are jolly then they visit the veriee. The veriee ensile the vivianna.", "logic": "\nJolly(veriee)\nEnsile(veriee, kurt)\nEnsile(veriee, vivianna)\nClamber(veriee, kurt)\nCarbonate(veriee, kurt)\nCarbonate(veriee, vivianna)\nJolly(kurt)\nEnsile(kurt, veriee)\nEnsile(kurt, vivianna)\nnot Clamber(kurt, veriee)\nCarbonate(kurt, vivianna)\nFlavorless(vivianna)\nLoud(vivianna)\nEnsile(vivianna, veriee)\nClamber(vivianna, veriee)\nforall x (Ensile(x, veriee) and Carbonate(veriee, kurt) -> Carbonate(x, kurt))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, kurt) and Jolly(x) -> Carbonate(x, veriee))\n\nEnsile(veriee, vivianna)\n\ntherefore Ensile(veriee, vivianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The barny is unmilitary. The barny rubric the jethro. The barny rubric the ricki. The barny slaver the jethro. The barny chaperon the jethro. The barny chaperon the ricki. The jethro is unmilitary. The jethro rubric the barny. The jethro rubric the ricki. The jethro does not need the barny. The jethro chaperon the ricki. The ricki is philatelic. The ricki is ungulate. The ricki rubric the barny. The ricki slaver the barny. If someone rubric the barny and the barny chaperon the jethro then they visit the jethro. If someone chaperon the jethro and they are unmilitary then they visit the barny. The jethro does not like the barny.", "logic": "\nUnmilitary(barny)\nRubric(barny, jethro)\nRubric(barny, ricki)\nSlaver(barny, jethro)\nChaperon(barny, jethro)\nChaperon(barny, ricki)\nUnmilitary(jethro)\nRubric(jethro, barny)\nRubric(jethro, ricki)\nnot Slaver(jethro, barny)\nChaperon(jethro, ricki)\nPhilatelic(ricki)\nUngulate(ricki)\nRubric(ricki, barny)\nSlaver(ricki, barny)\nforall x (Rubric(x, barny) and Chaperon(barny, jethro) -> Chaperon(x, jethro))\nforall x (Chaperon(x, jethro) and Unmilitary(x) -> Chaperon(x, barny))\n\nnot Rubric(jethro, barny)\n\ntherefore Rubric(jethro, barny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The milena is rightish. The milena eternize the tiphanie. The milena eternize the zita. The milena defoliate the tiphanie. The milena modify the tiphanie. The milena modify the zita. The tiphanie is rightish. The tiphanie eternize the milena. The tiphanie eternize the zita. The tiphanie does not need the milena. The tiphanie modify the zita. The zita is figurative. The zita is bats. The zita eternize the milena. The zita defoliate the milena. If someone eternize the milena and the milena modify the tiphanie then they visit the tiphanie. If someone modify the tiphanie and they are rightish then they visit the milena. The zita modify the tiphanie.", "logic": "\nRightish(milena)\nEternize(milena, tiphanie)\nEternize(milena, zita)\nDefoliate(milena, tiphanie)\nModify(milena, tiphanie)\nModify(milena, zita)\nRightish(tiphanie)\nEternize(tiphanie, milena)\nEternize(tiphanie, zita)\nnot Defoliate(tiphanie, milena)\nModify(tiphanie, zita)\nFigurative(zita)\nBats(zita)\nEternize(zita, milena)\nDefoliate(zita, milena)\nforall x (Eternize(x, milena) and Modify(milena, tiphanie) -> Modify(x, tiphanie))\nforall x (Modify(x, tiphanie) and Rightish(x) -> Modify(x, milena))\n\nModify(zita, tiphanie)\n\nEternize(zita, milena) and Modify(milena, tiphanie) and forall x (Eternize(x, milena) and Modify(milena, tiphanie) -> Modify(x, tiphanie)) -> therefore Modify(zita, tiphanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The nero is vagabond. The nero compere the issie. The nero compere the eldon. The nero rain the issie. The nero taint the issie. The nero taint the eldon. The issie is vagabond. The issie compere the nero. The issie compere the eldon. The issie does not need the nero. The issie taint the eldon. The eldon is transverse. The eldon is allomerous. The eldon compere the nero. The eldon rain the nero. If someone compere the nero and the nero taint the issie then they visit the issie. If someone taint the issie and they are vagabond then they visit the nero. The eldon does not visit the issie.", "logic": "\nVagabond(nero)\nCompere(nero, issie)\nCompere(nero, eldon)\nRain(nero, issie)\nTaint(nero, issie)\nTaint(nero, eldon)\nVagabond(issie)\nCompere(issie, nero)\nCompere(issie, eldon)\nnot Rain(issie, nero)\nTaint(issie, eldon)\nTransverse(eldon)\nAllomerous(eldon)\nCompere(eldon, nero)\nRain(eldon, nero)\nforall x (Compere(x, nero) and Taint(nero, issie) -> Taint(x, issie))\nforall x (Taint(x, issie) and Vagabond(x) -> Taint(x, nero))\n\nnot Taint(eldon, issie)\n\nCompere(eldon, nero) and Taint(nero, issie) and forall x (Compere(x, nero) and Taint(nero, issie) -> Taint(x, issie)) -> therefore Taint(eldon, issie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The francesco is marital. The francesco overwork the binnie. The francesco overwork the pascale. The francesco purr the binnie. The francesco consociate the binnie. The francesco consociate the pascale. The binnie is marital. The binnie overwork the francesco. The binnie overwork the pascale. The binnie does not need the francesco. The binnie consociate the pascale. The pascale is appraising. The pascale is coordinate. The pascale overwork the francesco. The pascale purr the francesco. If someone overwork the francesco and the francesco consociate the binnie then they visit the binnie. If someone consociate the binnie and they are marital then they visit the francesco. The binnie consociate the francesco.", "logic": "\nMarital(francesco)\nOverwork(francesco, binnie)\nOverwork(francesco, pascale)\nPurr(francesco, binnie)\nConsociate(francesco, binnie)\nConsociate(francesco, pascale)\nMarital(binnie)\nOverwork(binnie, francesco)\nOverwork(binnie, pascale)\nnot Purr(binnie, francesco)\nConsociate(binnie, pascale)\nAppraising(pascale)\nCoordinate(pascale)\nOverwork(pascale, francesco)\nPurr(pascale, francesco)\nforall x (Overwork(x, francesco) and Consociate(francesco, binnie) -> Consociate(x, binnie))\nforall x (Consociate(x, binnie) and Marital(x) -> Consociate(x, francesco))\n\nConsociate(binnie, francesco)\n\nOverwork(binnie, francesco) and Consociate(francesco, binnie) and forall x (Overwork(x, francesco) and Consociate(francesco, binnie) -> Consociate(x, binnie)) -> therefore Consociate(binnie, binnie) Consociate(binnie, binnie) and Marital(binnie) and forall x (Consociate(x, binnie) and Marital(x) -> Consociate(x, francesco)) -> therefore Consociate(binnie, francesco)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The rivalee is congealed. The rivalee frizzle the larissa. The rivalee frizzle the dorene. The rivalee discard the larissa. The rivalee burrow the larissa. The rivalee burrow the dorene. The larissa is congealed. The larissa frizzle the rivalee. The larissa frizzle the dorene. The larissa does not need the rivalee. The larissa burrow the dorene. The dorene is fingerless. The dorene is bogus. The dorene frizzle the rivalee. The dorene discard the rivalee. If someone frizzle the rivalee and the rivalee burrow the larissa then they visit the larissa. If someone burrow the larissa and they are congealed then they visit the rivalee. The larissa does not visit the rivalee.", "logic": "\nCongealed(rivalee)\nFrizzle(rivalee, larissa)\nFrizzle(rivalee, dorene)\nDiscard(rivalee, larissa)\nBurrow(rivalee, larissa)\nBurrow(rivalee, dorene)\nCongealed(larissa)\nFrizzle(larissa, rivalee)\nFrizzle(larissa, dorene)\nnot Discard(larissa, rivalee)\nBurrow(larissa, dorene)\nFingerless(dorene)\nBogus(dorene)\nFrizzle(dorene, rivalee)\nDiscard(dorene, rivalee)\nforall x (Frizzle(x, rivalee) and Burrow(rivalee, larissa) -> Burrow(x, larissa))\nforall x (Burrow(x, larissa) and Congealed(x) -> Burrow(x, rivalee))\n\nnot Burrow(larissa, rivalee)\n\nFrizzle(larissa, rivalee) and Burrow(rivalee, larissa) and forall x (Frizzle(x, rivalee) and Burrow(rivalee, larissa) -> Burrow(x, larissa)) -> therefore Burrow(larissa, larissa) Burrow(larissa, larissa) and Congealed(larissa) and forall x (Burrow(x, larissa) and Congealed(x) -> Burrow(x, rivalee)) -> therefore Burrow(larissa, rivalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The marion is splay. The marion virilise the cristabel. The marion virilise the else. The marion stenograph the cristabel. The marion housekeep the cristabel. The marion housekeep the else. The cristabel is splay. The cristabel virilise the marion. The cristabel virilise the else. The cristabel does not need the marion. The cristabel housekeep the else. The else is piddling. The else is newborn. The else virilise the marion. The else stenograph the marion. If someone virilise the marion and the marion housekeep the cristabel then they visit the cristabel. If someone housekeep the cristabel and they are splay then they visit the marion. The else does not visit the marion.", "logic": "\nSplay(marion)\nVirilise(marion, cristabel)\nVirilise(marion, else)\nStenograph(marion, cristabel)\nHousekeep(marion, cristabel)\nHousekeep(marion, else)\nSplay(cristabel)\nVirilise(cristabel, marion)\nVirilise(cristabel, else)\nnot Stenograph(cristabel, marion)\nHousekeep(cristabel, else)\nPiddling(else)\nNewborn(else)\nVirilise(else, marion)\nStenograph(else, marion)\nforall x (Virilise(x, marion) and Housekeep(marion, cristabel) -> Housekeep(x, cristabel))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, cristabel) and Splay(x) -> Housekeep(x, marion))\n\nnot Housekeep(else, marion)\n\nforall x (Housekeep(x, cristabel) and Splay(x) -> Housekeep(x, marion)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The roxana is higher. The roxana singsong the noellyn. The roxana singsong the kee. The roxana presage the noellyn. The roxana pivot the noellyn. The roxana pivot the kee. The noellyn is higher. The noellyn singsong the roxana. The noellyn singsong the kee. The noellyn does not need the roxana. The noellyn pivot the kee. The kee is epiphyseal. The kee is cormose. The kee singsong the roxana. The kee presage the roxana. If someone singsong the roxana and the roxana pivot the noellyn then they visit the noellyn. If someone pivot the noellyn and they are higher then they visit the roxana. The roxana is cold.", "logic": "\nHigher(roxana)\nSingsong(roxana, noellyn)\nSingsong(roxana, kee)\nPresage(roxana, noellyn)\nPivot(roxana, noellyn)\nPivot(roxana, kee)\nHigher(noellyn)\nSingsong(noellyn, roxana)\nSingsong(noellyn, kee)\nnot Presage(noellyn, roxana)\nPivot(noellyn, kee)\nEpiphyseal(kee)\nCormose(kee)\nSingsong(kee, roxana)\nPresage(kee, roxana)\nforall x (Singsong(x, roxana) and Pivot(roxana, noellyn) -> Pivot(x, noellyn))\nforall x (Pivot(x, noellyn) and Higher(x) -> Pivot(x, roxana))\n\nCold(roxana)\n\nCold(roxana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The hudson is nodular. The hudson cinch the tonnie. The hudson cinch the kirbie. The hudson latinize the tonnie. The hudson chivvy the tonnie. The hudson chivvy the kirbie. The tonnie is nodular. The tonnie cinch the hudson. The tonnie cinch the kirbie. The tonnie does not need the hudson. The tonnie chivvy the kirbie. The kirbie is dormant. The kirbie is venetian. The kirbie cinch the hudson. The kirbie latinize the hudson. If someone cinch the hudson and the hudson chivvy the tonnie then they visit the tonnie. If someone chivvy the tonnie and they are nodular then they visit the hudson. The hudson is not green.", "logic": "\nNodular(hudson)\nCinch(hudson, tonnie)\nCinch(hudson, kirbie)\nLatinize(hudson, tonnie)\nChivvy(hudson, tonnie)\nChivvy(hudson, kirbie)\nNodular(tonnie)\nCinch(tonnie, hudson)\nCinch(tonnie, kirbie)\nnot Latinize(tonnie, hudson)\nChivvy(tonnie, kirbie)\nDormant(kirbie)\nVenetian(kirbie)\nCinch(kirbie, hudson)\nLatinize(kirbie, hudson)\nforall x (Cinch(x, hudson) and Chivvy(hudson, tonnie) -> Chivvy(x, tonnie))\nforall x (Chivvy(x, tonnie) and Nodular(x) -> Chivvy(x, hudson))\n\nnot Green(hudson)\n\nnot Green(hudson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The hyman is unstarred. The hyman embody the geoff. The hyman embody the halie. The hyman centrifuge the geoff. The hyman spiritize the geoff. The hyman spiritize the halie. The geoff is unstarred. The geoff embody the hyman. The geoff embody the halie. The geoff does not need the hyman. The geoff spiritize the halie. The halie is grotty. The halie is unshapen. The halie embody the hyman. The halie centrifuge the hyman. If someone embody the hyman and the hyman spiritize the geoff then they visit the geoff. If someone spiritize the geoff and they are unstarred then they visit the hyman. The halie is green.", "logic": "\nUnstarred(hyman)\nEmbody(hyman, geoff)\nEmbody(hyman, halie)\nCentrifuge(hyman, geoff)\nSpiritize(hyman, geoff)\nSpiritize(hyman, halie)\nUnstarred(geoff)\nEmbody(geoff, hyman)\nEmbody(geoff, halie)\nnot Centrifuge(geoff, hyman)\nSpiritize(geoff, halie)\nGrotty(halie)\nUnshapen(halie)\nEmbody(halie, hyman)\nCentrifuge(halie, hyman)\nforall x (Embody(x, hyman) and Spiritize(hyman, geoff) -> Spiritize(x, geoff))\nforall x (Spiritize(x, geoff) and Unstarred(x) -> Spiritize(x, hyman))\n\nGreen(halie)\n\nGreen(halie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The rodolph is discreet. The rodolph beshrew the zollie. The rodolph beshrew the arnie. The rodolph cleanse the zollie. The rodolph natter the zollie. The rodolph natter the arnie. The zollie is discreet. The zollie beshrew the rodolph. The zollie beshrew the arnie. The zollie does not need the rodolph. The zollie natter the arnie. The arnie is intragroup. The arnie is callow. The arnie beshrew the rodolph. The arnie cleanse the rodolph. If someone beshrew the rodolph and the rodolph natter the zollie then they visit the zollie. If someone natter the zollie and they are discreet then they visit the rodolph. The zollie is not green.", "logic": "\nDiscreet(rodolph)\nBeshrew(rodolph, zollie)\nBeshrew(rodolph, arnie)\nCleanse(rodolph, zollie)\nNatter(rodolph, zollie)\nNatter(rodolph, arnie)\nDiscreet(zollie)\nBeshrew(zollie, rodolph)\nBeshrew(zollie, arnie)\nnot Cleanse(zollie, rodolph)\nNatter(zollie, arnie)\nIntragroup(arnie)\nCallow(arnie)\nBeshrew(arnie, rodolph)\nCleanse(arnie, rodolph)\nforall x (Beshrew(x, rodolph) and Natter(rodolph, zollie) -> Natter(x, zollie))\nforall x (Natter(x, zollie) and Discreet(x) -> Natter(x, rodolph))\n\nnot Green(zollie)\n\nnot Green(zollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The chet is granted. The chet jeopardize the godiva. The chet jeopardize the fabrice. The chet falcon the godiva. The chet binge the godiva. The chet binge the fabrice. The godiva is granted. The godiva jeopardize the chet. The godiva jeopardize the fabrice. The godiva does not need the chet. The godiva binge the fabrice. The fabrice is cracking. The fabrice is unsought. The fabrice jeopardize the chet. The fabrice falcon the chet. If someone jeopardize the chet and the chet binge the godiva then they visit the godiva. If someone binge the godiva and they are granted then they visit the chet. The godiva is cold.", "logic": "\nGranted(chet)\nJeopardize(chet, godiva)\nJeopardize(chet, fabrice)\nFalcon(chet, godiva)\nBinge(chet, godiva)\nBinge(chet, fabrice)\nGranted(godiva)\nJeopardize(godiva, chet)\nJeopardize(godiva, fabrice)\nnot Falcon(godiva, chet)\nBinge(godiva, fabrice)\nCracking(fabrice)\nUnsought(fabrice)\nJeopardize(fabrice, chet)\nFalcon(fabrice, chet)\nforall x (Jeopardize(x, chet) and Binge(chet, godiva) -> Binge(x, godiva))\nforall x (Binge(x, godiva) and Granted(x) -> Binge(x, chet))\n\nCold(godiva)\n\nCold(godiva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The christine crew the kaspar. The christine is unwished. The christine is swimming. The christine is sardinian. The christine proof the kaspar. The christine raffle the kaspar. The kaspar crew the christine. The kaspar is corpulent. The kaspar is unwished. The kaspar proof the christine. If someone is sardinian then they need the kaspar. If someone is corpulent and they see the christine then the christine is corpulent. If someone proof the kaspar then they are unwished. Young people are corpulent. All drizzly people are sardinian. If someone crew the christine and the christine raffle the kaspar then the kaspar raffle the christine. If someone is sardinian and they eat the christine then they need the kaspar. If someone raffle the kaspar then they need the kaspar. The kaspar crew the christine.", "logic": "\nCrew(christine, kaspar)\nUnwished(christine)\nSwimming(christine)\nSardinian(christine)\nProof(christine, kaspar)\nRaffle(christine, kaspar)\nCrew(kaspar, christine)\nCorpulent(kaspar)\nUnwished(kaspar)\nProof(kaspar, christine)\nforall x (Sardinian(x) -> Proof(x, kaspar))\nforall x (Corpulent(x) and Raffle(x, christine) -> Corpulent(christine))\nforall x (Proof(x, kaspar) -> Unwished(x))\nforall x (Drizzly(x) -> Corpulent(x))\nforall x (Drizzly(x) -> Sardinian(x))\nforall x (Crew(x, christine) and Raffle(christine, kaspar) -> Raffle(kaspar, christine))\nforall x (Sardinian(x) and Crew(x, christine) -> Proof(x, kaspar))\nforall x (Raffle(x, kaspar) -> Proof(x, kaspar))\n\nCrew(kaspar, christine)\n\ntherefore Crew(kaspar, christine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The corky energise the giselle. The corky is deadlocked. The corky is sluicing. The corky is skinned. The corky plough the giselle. The corky lapse the giselle. The giselle energise the corky. The giselle is diurnal. The giselle is deadlocked. The giselle plough the corky. If someone is skinned then they need the giselle. If someone is diurnal and they see the corky then the corky is diurnal. If someone plough the giselle then they are deadlocked. Young people are diurnal. All cystic people are skinned. If someone energise the corky and the corky lapse the giselle then the giselle lapse the corky. If someone is skinned and they eat the corky then they need the giselle. If someone lapse the giselle then they need the giselle. The giselle does not need the corky.", "logic": "\nEnergise(corky, giselle)\nDeadlocked(corky)\nSluicing(corky)\nSkinned(corky)\nPlough(corky, giselle)\nLapse(corky, giselle)\nEnergise(giselle, corky)\nDiurnal(giselle)\nDeadlocked(giselle)\nPlough(giselle, corky)\nforall x (Skinned(x) -> Plough(x, giselle))\nforall x (Diurnal(x) and Lapse(x, corky) -> Diurnal(corky))\nforall x (Plough(x, giselle) -> Deadlocked(x))\nforall x (Cystic(x) -> Diurnal(x))\nforall x (Cystic(x) -> Skinned(x))\nforall x (Energise(x, corky) and Lapse(corky, giselle) -> Lapse(giselle, corky))\nforall x (Skinned(x) and Energise(x, corky) -> Plough(x, giselle))\nforall x (Lapse(x, giselle) -> Plough(x, giselle))\n\nnot Plough(giselle, corky)\n\ntherefore Plough(giselle, corky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The bunny stash the dorey. The bunny is astonished. The bunny is abstract. The bunny is incomplete. The bunny speed the dorey. The bunny outspan the dorey. The dorey stash the bunny. The dorey is thirteenth. The dorey is astonished. The dorey speed the bunny. If someone is incomplete then they need the dorey. If someone is thirteenth and they see the bunny then the bunny is thirteenth. If someone speed the dorey then they are astonished. Young people are thirteenth. All hypotonic people are incomplete. If someone stash the bunny and the bunny outspan the dorey then the dorey outspan the bunny. If someone is incomplete and they eat the bunny then they need the dorey. If someone outspan the dorey then they need the dorey. The dorey outspan the bunny.", "logic": "\nStash(bunny, dorey)\nAstonished(bunny)\nAbstract(bunny)\nIncomplete(bunny)\nSpeed(bunny, dorey)\nOutspan(bunny, dorey)\nStash(dorey, bunny)\nThirteenth(dorey)\nAstonished(dorey)\nSpeed(dorey, bunny)\nforall x (Incomplete(x) -> Speed(x, dorey))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and Outspan(x, bunny) -> Thirteenth(bunny))\nforall x (Speed(x, dorey) -> Astonished(x))\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) -> Incomplete(x))\nforall x (Stash(x, bunny) and Outspan(bunny, dorey) -> Outspan(dorey, bunny))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) and Stash(x, bunny) -> Speed(x, dorey))\nforall x (Outspan(x, dorey) -> Speed(x, dorey))\n\nOutspan(dorey, bunny)\n\nStash(dorey, bunny) and Outspan(bunny, dorey) and forall x (Stash(x, bunny) and Outspan(bunny, dorey) -> Outspan(dorey, bunny)) -> therefore Outspan(dorey, bunny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The judas spell the ulrike. The judas is anti. The judas is celiac. The judas is feigned. The judas tampon the ulrike. The judas despatch the ulrike. The ulrike spell the judas. The ulrike is sunburnt. The ulrike is anti. The ulrike tampon the judas. If someone is feigned then they need the ulrike. If someone is sunburnt and they see the judas then the judas is sunburnt. If someone tampon the ulrike then they are anti. Young people are sunburnt. All required people are feigned. If someone spell the judas and the judas despatch the ulrike then the ulrike despatch the judas. If someone is feigned and they eat the judas then they need the ulrike. If someone despatch the ulrike then they need the ulrike. The ulrike does not see the judas.", "logic": "\nSpell(judas, ulrike)\nAnti(judas)\nCeliac(judas)\nFeigned(judas)\nTampon(judas, ulrike)\nDespatch(judas, ulrike)\nSpell(ulrike, judas)\nSunburnt(ulrike)\nAnti(ulrike)\nTampon(ulrike, judas)\nforall x (Feigned(x) -> Tampon(x, ulrike))\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) and Despatch(x, judas) -> Sunburnt(judas))\nforall x (Tampon(x, ulrike) -> Anti(x))\nforall x (Required(x) -> Sunburnt(x))\nforall x (Required(x) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Spell(x, judas) and Despatch(judas, ulrike) -> Despatch(ulrike, judas))\nforall x (Feigned(x) and Spell(x, judas) -> Tampon(x, ulrike))\nforall x (Despatch(x, ulrike) -> Tampon(x, ulrike))\n\nnot Despatch(ulrike, judas)\n\nSpell(ulrike, judas) and Despatch(judas, ulrike) and forall x (Spell(x, judas) and Despatch(judas, ulrike) -> Despatch(ulrike, judas)) -> therefore Despatch(ulrike, judas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The natalie tipple the janka. The natalie is untruthful. The natalie is basophilic. The natalie is rosaceous. The natalie dwindle the janka. The natalie smelt the janka. The janka tipple the natalie. The janka is aesthetic. The janka is untruthful. The janka dwindle the natalie. If someone is rosaceous then they need the janka. If someone is aesthetic and they see the natalie then the natalie is aesthetic. If someone dwindle the janka then they are untruthful. Young people are aesthetic. All talentless people are rosaceous. If someone tipple the natalie and the natalie smelt the janka then the janka smelt the natalie. If someone is rosaceous and they eat the natalie then they need the janka. If someone smelt the janka then they need the janka. The natalie is aesthetic.", "logic": "\nTipple(natalie, janka)\nUntruthful(natalie)\nBasophilic(natalie)\nRosaceous(natalie)\nDwindle(natalie, janka)\nSmelt(natalie, janka)\nTipple(janka, natalie)\nAesthetic(janka)\nUntruthful(janka)\nDwindle(janka, natalie)\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) -> Dwindle(x, janka))\nforall x (Aesthetic(x) and Smelt(x, natalie) -> Aesthetic(natalie))\nforall x (Dwindle(x, janka) -> Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Talentless(x) -> Aesthetic(x))\nforall x (Talentless(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Tipple(x, natalie) and Smelt(natalie, janka) -> Smelt(janka, natalie))\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) and Tipple(x, natalie) -> Dwindle(x, janka))\nforall x (Smelt(x, janka) -> Dwindle(x, janka))\n\nAesthetic(natalie)\n\nTipple(janka, natalie) and Smelt(natalie, janka) and forall x (Tipple(x, natalie) and Smelt(natalie, janka) -> Smelt(janka, natalie)) -> therefore Smelt(janka, natalie) Aesthetic(janka) and Smelt(janka, natalie) and forall x (Aesthetic(x) and Smelt(x, natalie) -> Aesthetic(natalie)) -> therefore Aesthetic(natalie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The hillery palliate the aimil. The hillery is revenant. The hillery is undeniable. The hillery is unwearied. The hillery consult the aimil. The hillery unitise the aimil. The aimil palliate the hillery. The aimil is okay. The aimil is revenant. The aimil consult the hillery. If someone is unwearied then they need the aimil. If someone is okay and they see the hillery then the hillery is okay. If someone consult the aimil then they are revenant. Young people are okay. All reborn people are unwearied. If someone palliate the hillery and the hillery unitise the aimil then the aimil unitise the hillery. If someone is unwearied and they eat the hillery then they need the aimil. If someone unitise the aimil then they need the aimil. The hillery is not okay.", "logic": "\nPalliate(hillery, aimil)\nRevenant(hillery)\nUndeniable(hillery)\nUnwearied(hillery)\nConsult(hillery, aimil)\nUnitise(hillery, aimil)\nPalliate(aimil, hillery)\nOkay(aimil)\nRevenant(aimil)\nConsult(aimil, hillery)\nforall x (Unwearied(x) -> Consult(x, aimil))\nforall x (Okay(x) and Unitise(x, hillery) -> Okay(hillery))\nforall x (Consult(x, aimil) -> Revenant(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) -> Okay(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) -> Unwearied(x))\nforall x (Palliate(x, hillery) and Unitise(hillery, aimil) -> Unitise(aimil, hillery))\nforall x (Unwearied(x) and Palliate(x, hillery) -> Consult(x, aimil))\nforall x (Unitise(x, aimil) -> Consult(x, aimil))\n\nnot Okay(hillery)\n\nPalliate(aimil, hillery) and Unitise(hillery, aimil) and forall x (Palliate(x, hillery) and Unitise(hillery, aimil) -> Unitise(aimil, hillery)) -> therefore Unitise(aimil, hillery) Okay(aimil) and Unitise(aimil, hillery) and forall x (Okay(x) and Unitise(x, hillery) -> Okay(hillery)) -> therefore Okay(hillery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The arvin cachinnate the riki. The arvin is exorbitant. The arvin is unorthodox. The arvin is blooded. The arvin slink the riki. The arvin disbelieve the riki. The riki cachinnate the arvin. The riki is aleatory. The riki is exorbitant. The riki slink the arvin. If someone is blooded then they need the riki. If someone is aleatory and they see the arvin then the arvin is aleatory. If someone slink the riki then they are exorbitant. Young people are aleatory. All harried people are blooded. If someone cachinnate the arvin and the arvin disbelieve the riki then the riki disbelieve the arvin. If someone is blooded and they eat the arvin then they need the riki. If someone disbelieve the riki then they need the riki. The riki is not blooded.", "logic": "\nCachinnate(arvin, riki)\nExorbitant(arvin)\nUnorthodox(arvin)\nBlooded(arvin)\nSlink(arvin, riki)\nDisbelieve(arvin, riki)\nCachinnate(riki, arvin)\nAleatory(riki)\nExorbitant(riki)\nSlink(riki, arvin)\nforall x (Blooded(x) -> Slink(x, riki))\nforall x (Aleatory(x) and Disbelieve(x, arvin) -> Aleatory(arvin))\nforall x (Slink(x, riki) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Aleatory(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Blooded(x))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, arvin) and Disbelieve(arvin, riki) -> Disbelieve(riki, arvin))\nforall x (Blooded(x) and Cachinnate(x, arvin) -> Slink(x, riki))\nforall x (Disbelieve(x, riki) -> Slink(x, riki))\n\nnot Blooded(riki)\n\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Blooded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The kameko welcome the vivia. The kameko is uninvited. The kameko is cuneiform. The kameko is chapleted. The kameko bedazzle the vivia. The kameko dehumanise the vivia. The vivia welcome the kameko. The vivia is rainy. The vivia is uninvited. The vivia bedazzle the kameko. If someone is chapleted then they need the vivia. If someone is rainy and they see the kameko then the kameko is rainy. If someone bedazzle the vivia then they are uninvited. Young people are rainy. All chordate people are chapleted. If someone welcome the kameko and the kameko dehumanise the vivia then the vivia dehumanise the kameko. If someone is chapleted and they eat the kameko then they need the vivia. If someone dehumanise the vivia then they need the vivia. The vivia bedazzle the vivia.", "logic": "\nWelcome(kameko, vivia)\nUninvited(kameko)\nCuneiform(kameko)\nChapleted(kameko)\nBedazzle(kameko, vivia)\nDehumanise(kameko, vivia)\nWelcome(vivia, kameko)\nRainy(vivia)\nUninvited(vivia)\nBedazzle(vivia, kameko)\nforall x (Chapleted(x) -> Bedazzle(x, vivia))\nforall x (Rainy(x) and Dehumanise(x, kameko) -> Rainy(kameko))\nforall x (Bedazzle(x, vivia) -> Uninvited(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) -> Rainy(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) -> Chapleted(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x, kameko) and Dehumanise(kameko, vivia) -> Dehumanise(vivia, kameko))\nforall x (Chapleted(x) and Welcome(x, kameko) -> Bedazzle(x, vivia))\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, vivia) -> Bedazzle(x, vivia))\n\nBedazzle(vivia, vivia)\n\nforall x (Chapleted(x) -> Bedazzle(x, vivia)) <- forall x (Chordate(x) -> Chapleted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The alys attire the tiffie. The alys is alkahestic. The alys is stagey. The alys is extramural. The alys surmise the tiffie. The alys kneel the tiffie. The tiffie attire the alys. The tiffie is sinhala. The tiffie is alkahestic. The tiffie surmise the alys. If someone is extramural then they need the tiffie. If someone is sinhala and they see the alys then the alys is sinhala. If someone surmise the tiffie then they are alkahestic. Young people are sinhala. All snappy people are extramural. If someone attire the alys and the alys kneel the tiffie then the tiffie kneel the alys. If someone is extramural and they eat the alys then they need the tiffie. If someone kneel the tiffie then they need the tiffie. The tiffie does not see the tiffie.", "logic": "\nAttire(alys, tiffie)\nAlkahestic(alys)\nStagey(alys)\nExtramural(alys)\nSurmise(alys, tiffie)\nKneel(alys, tiffie)\nAttire(tiffie, alys)\nSinhala(tiffie)\nAlkahestic(tiffie)\nSurmise(tiffie, alys)\nforall x (Extramural(x) -> Surmise(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) and Kneel(x, alys) -> Sinhala(alys))\nforall x (Surmise(x, tiffie) -> Alkahestic(x))\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> Extramural(x))\nforall x (Attire(x, alys) and Kneel(alys, tiffie) -> Kneel(tiffie, alys))\nforall x (Extramural(x) and Attire(x, alys) -> Surmise(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Kneel(x, tiffie) -> Surmise(x, tiffie))\n\nnot Kneel(tiffie, tiffie)\n\nnot Kneel(tiffie, tiffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The terina casket the randell. The terina is agonistic. The terina is botuliform. The terina is errorless. The terina forgather the randell. The terina garden the randell. The randell casket the terina. The randell is reversible. The randell is agonistic. The randell forgather the terina. If someone is errorless then they need the randell. If someone is reversible and they see the terina then the terina is reversible. If someone forgather the randell then they are agonistic. Young people are reversible. All australian people are errorless. If someone casket the terina and the terina garden the randell then the randell garden the terina. If someone is errorless and they eat the terina then they need the randell. If someone garden the randell then they need the randell. The terina forgather the terina.", "logic": "\nCasket(terina, randell)\nAgonistic(terina)\nBotuliform(terina)\nErrorless(terina)\nForgather(terina, randell)\nGarden(terina, randell)\nCasket(randell, terina)\nReversible(randell)\nAgonistic(randell)\nForgather(randell, terina)\nforall x (Errorless(x) -> Forgather(x, randell))\nforall x (Reversible(x) and Garden(x, terina) -> Reversible(terina))\nforall x (Forgather(x, randell) -> Agonistic(x))\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Errorless(x))\nforall x (Casket(x, terina) and Garden(terina, randell) -> Garden(randell, terina))\nforall x (Errorless(x) and Casket(x, terina) -> Forgather(x, randell))\nforall x (Garden(x, randell) -> Forgather(x, randell))\n\nForgather(terina, terina)\n\nForgather(terina, terina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The wye shinny the susan. The wye is spirited. The wye is coarsened. The wye is loyal. The wye caramelize the susan. The wye mislead the susan. The susan shinny the wye. The susan is predacious. The susan is spirited. The susan caramelize the wye. If someone is loyal then they need the susan. If someone is predacious and they see the wye then the wye is predacious. If someone caramelize the susan then they are spirited. Young people are predacious. All folding people are loyal. If someone shinny the wye and the wye mislead the susan then the susan mislead the wye. If someone is loyal and they eat the wye then they need the susan. If someone mislead the susan then they need the susan. The susan is not folding.", "logic": "\nShinny(wye, susan)\nSpirited(wye)\nCoarsened(wye)\nLoyal(wye)\nCaramelize(wye, susan)\nMislead(wye, susan)\nShinny(susan, wye)\nPredacious(susan)\nSpirited(susan)\nCaramelize(susan, wye)\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Caramelize(x, susan))\nforall x (Predacious(x) and Mislead(x, wye) -> Predacious(wye))\nforall x (Caramelize(x, susan) -> Spirited(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Predacious(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Shinny(x, wye) and Mislead(wye, susan) -> Mislead(susan, wye))\nforall x (Loyal(x) and Shinny(x, wye) -> Caramelize(x, susan))\nforall x (Mislead(x, susan) -> Caramelize(x, susan))\n\nnot Folding(susan)\n\nnot Folding(susan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "The norton flick the barbey. The norton is deceased. The norton is torrid. The norton is busy. The norton jerk the barbey. The norton harvest the barbey. The barbey flick the norton. The barbey is supine. The barbey is deceased. The barbey jerk the norton. If someone is busy then they need the barbey. If someone is supine and they see the norton then the norton is supine. If someone jerk the barbey then they are deceased. Young people are supine. All epizoic people are busy. If someone flick the norton and the norton harvest the barbey then the barbey harvest the norton. If someone is busy and they eat the norton then they need the barbey. If someone harvest the barbey then they need the barbey. The norton flick the norton.", "logic": "\nFlick(norton, barbey)\nDeceased(norton)\nTorrid(norton)\nBusy(norton)\nJerk(norton, barbey)\nHarvest(norton, barbey)\nFlick(barbey, norton)\nSupine(barbey)\nDeceased(barbey)\nJerk(barbey, norton)\nforall x (Busy(x) -> Jerk(x, barbey))\nforall x (Supine(x) and Harvest(x, norton) -> Supine(norton))\nforall x (Jerk(x, barbey) -> Deceased(x))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Supine(x))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Busy(x))\nforall x (Flick(x, norton) and Harvest(norton, barbey) -> Harvest(barbey, norton))\nforall x (Busy(x) and Flick(x, norton) -> Jerk(x, barbey))\nforall x (Harvest(x, barbey) -> Jerk(x, barbey))\n\nFlick(norton, norton)\n\nFlick(norton, norton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-847"} {"premises": "Jeanelle is lancelike. Jeanelle is prudent. Caressa is adulterate. Caressa is satyrical. Obadias is lancelike. Tyson is larboard. Tyson is adulterate. Kind people are adulterate. All lancelike people are abloom. Jeanelle is lancelike.", "logic": "\nLancelike(jeanelle)\nPrudent(jeanelle)\nAdulterate(caressa)\nSatyrical(caressa)\nLancelike(obadias)\nLarboard(tyson)\nAdulterate(tyson)\nforall x (Abloom(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nforall x (Lancelike(x) -> Abloom(x))\n\nLancelike(jeanelle)\n\ntherefore Lancelike(jeanelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Yevette is astonished. Yevette is untidy. Malynda is wild. Malynda is ukrainian. Tamiko is astonished. Starr is atactic. Starr is wild. Kind people are wild. All astonished people are trancelike. Yevette is not astonished.", "logic": "\nAstonished(yevette)\nUntidy(yevette)\nWild(malynda)\nUkrainian(malynda)\nAstonished(tamiko)\nAtactic(starr)\nWild(starr)\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Wild(x))\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> Trancelike(x))\n\nnot Astonished(yevette)\n\ntherefore Astonished(yevette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Haskel is sensory. Haskel is leakproof. Dacie is wicked. Dacie is sectioned. Goldie is sensory. Emili is catalytic. Emili is wicked. Kind people are wicked. All sensory people are fruity. Goldie is fruity.", "logic": "\nSensory(haskel)\nLeakproof(haskel)\nWicked(dacie)\nSectioned(dacie)\nSensory(goldie)\nCatalytic(emili)\nWicked(emili)\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> Wicked(x))\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Fruity(x))\n\nFruity(goldie)\n\nSensory(goldie) and forall x (Sensory(x) -> Fruity(x)) -> therefore Fruity(goldie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Morton is shintoist. Morton is gusseted. Donovan is avifaunal. Donovan is sunlit. Vivien is shintoist. Suellen is unripened. Suellen is avifaunal. Kind people are avifaunal. All shintoist people are busybodied. Vivien is not busybodied.", "logic": "\nShintoist(morton)\nGusseted(morton)\nAvifaunal(donovan)\nSunlit(donovan)\nShintoist(vivien)\nUnripened(suellen)\nAvifaunal(suellen)\nforall x (Busybodied(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\nforall x (Shintoist(x) -> Busybodied(x))\n\nnot Busybodied(vivien)\n\nShintoist(vivien) and forall x (Shintoist(x) -> Busybodied(x)) -> therefore Busybodied(vivien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Hillel is located. Hillel is anaplastic. Jessey is xcviii. Jessey is wolflike. Maddie is located. Ursula is kinglike. Ursula is xcviii. Kind people are xcviii. All located people are unshadowed. Maddie is xcviii.", "logic": "\nLocated(hillel)\nAnaplastic(hillel)\nXcviii(jessey)\nWolflike(jessey)\nLocated(maddie)\nKinglike(ursula)\nXcviii(ursula)\nforall x (Unshadowed(x) -> Xcviii(x))\nforall x (Located(x) -> Unshadowed(x))\n\nXcviii(maddie)\n\nLocated(maddie) and forall x (Located(x) -> Unshadowed(x)) -> therefore Unshadowed(maddie) Unshadowed(maddie) and forall x (Unshadowed(x) -> Xcviii(x)) -> therefore Xcviii(maddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Fey is sobering. Fey is censored. Gredel is tortured. Gredel is sugarless. Tessy is sobering. Ailyn is pectoral. Ailyn is tortured. Kind people are tortured. All sobering people are edged. Fey is not tortured.", "logic": "\nSobering(fey)\nCensored(fey)\nTortured(gredel)\nSugarless(gredel)\nSobering(tessy)\nPectoral(ailyn)\nTortured(ailyn)\nforall x (Edged(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Sobering(x) -> Edged(x))\n\nnot Tortured(fey)\n\nSobering(fey) and forall x (Sobering(x) -> Edged(x)) -> therefore Edged(fey) Edged(fey) and forall x (Edged(x) -> Tortured(x)) -> therefore Tortured(fey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Lindsay is malign. Lindsay is faithful. Rhetta is unbordered. Rhetta is effective. Kitty is malign. Garvy is speckless. Garvy is unbordered. Kind people are unbordered. All malign people are drear. Garvy is not drear.", "logic": "\nMalign(lindsay)\nFaithful(lindsay)\nUnbordered(rhetta)\nEffective(rhetta)\nMalign(kitty)\nSpeckless(garvy)\nUnbordered(garvy)\nforall x (Drear(x) -> Unbordered(x))\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Drear(x))\n\nnot Drear(garvy)\n\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Drear(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Merline is onymous. Merline is anorthitic. Olga is proclaimed. Olga is fourth. Sorcha is onymous. Mack is homeward. Mack is proclaimed. Kind people are proclaimed. All onymous people are isogonic. Olga is isogonic.", "logic": "\nOnymous(merline)\nAnorthitic(merline)\nProclaimed(olga)\nFourth(olga)\nOnymous(sorcha)\nHomeward(mack)\nProclaimed(mack)\nforall x (Isogonic(x) -> Proclaimed(x))\nforall x (Onymous(x) -> Isogonic(x))\n\nIsogonic(olga)\n\nforall x (Onymous(x) -> Isogonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Horacio is extendible. Horacio is liege. Cammi is scrivened. Cammi is dianoetic. Denis is extendible. Livia is moonstruck. Livia is scrivened. Kind people are scrivened. All extendible people are polygynous. Livia is not liege.", "logic": "\nExtendible(horacio)\nLiege(horacio)\nScrivened(cammi)\nDianoetic(cammi)\nExtendible(denis)\nMoonstruck(livia)\nScrivened(livia)\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> Scrivened(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Polygynous(x))\n\nnot Liege(livia)\n\nnot Liege(livia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Nessie is sunset. Nessie is jarring. Chester is unlaced. Chester is faulty. Rabi is sunset. Velvet is gabonese. Velvet is unlaced. Kind people are unlaced. All sunset people are assistant. Chester is sunset.", "logic": "\nSunset(nessie)\nJarring(nessie)\nUnlaced(chester)\nFaulty(chester)\nSunset(rabi)\nGabonese(velvet)\nUnlaced(velvet)\nforall x (Assistant(x) -> Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Sunset(x) -> Assistant(x))\n\nSunset(chester)\n\nSunset(chester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Layla is evitable. Layla is forficate. Terrel is beatable. Terrel is harmful. Reginauld is evitable. Carmelita is triple. Carmelita is beatable. Kind people are beatable. All evitable people are catarrhal. Layla is not harmful.", "logic": "\nEvitable(layla)\nForficate(layla)\nBeatable(terrel)\nHarmful(terrel)\nEvitable(reginauld)\nTriple(carmelita)\nBeatable(carmelita)\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) -> Beatable(x))\nforall x (Evitable(x) -> Catarrhal(x))\n\nnot Harmful(layla)\n\nnot Harmful(layla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Marcello is womanlike. Marcello is halcyon. Dorene is chordal. Dorene is grimy. Diane is womanlike. Elias is piscine. Elias is chordal. Kind people are chordal. All womanlike people are stoned. Diane is halcyon.", "logic": "\nWomanlike(marcello)\nHalcyon(marcello)\nChordal(dorene)\nGrimy(dorene)\nWomanlike(diane)\nPiscine(elias)\nChordal(elias)\nforall x (Stoned(x) -> Chordal(x))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Stoned(x))\n\nHalcyon(diane)\n\nHalcyon(diane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-220"} {"premises": "Otto is itchy. Merla is mannerly. Row is not supervised. If someone is mannerly then they are unpictured. Green people are itchy. If someone is unshaved then they are mannerly. Row is not supervised.", "logic": "\nItchy(otto)\nMannerly(merla)\nnot Supervised(row)\nforall x (Mannerly(x) -> Unpictured(x))\nforall x (Unpictured(x) -> Itchy(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Mannerly(x))\n\nnot Supervised(row)\n\ntherefore not Supervised(row)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Rudy is outback. Dasha is disunited. Mac is not loved. If someone is disunited then they are pulverised. Green people are outback. If someone is tumultuous then they are disunited. Rudy is not outback.", "logic": "\nOutback(rudy)\nDisunited(dasha)\nnot Loved(mac)\nforall x (Disunited(x) -> Pulverised(x))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) -> Outback(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Disunited(x))\n\nnot Outback(rudy)\n\ntherefore Outback(rudy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Brana is prepared. Wallie is runty. Carolie is not rotten. If someone is runty then they are secular. Green people are prepared. If someone is arrhythmic then they are runty. Wallie is secular.", "logic": "\nPrepared(brana)\nRunty(wallie)\nnot Rotten(carolie)\nforall x (Runty(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Secular(x) -> Prepared(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) -> Runty(x))\n\nSecular(wallie)\n\nRunty(wallie) and forall x (Runty(x) -> Secular(x)) -> therefore Secular(wallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Ronalda is dopy. Diena is cherished. Joya is not extremist. If someone is cherished then they are infectious. Green people are dopy. If someone is searing then they are cherished. Diena is not infectious.", "logic": "\nDopy(ronalda)\nCherished(diena)\nnot Extremist(joya)\nforall x (Cherished(x) -> Infectious(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Dopy(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Cherished(x))\n\nnot Infectious(diena)\n\nCherished(diena) and forall x (Cherished(x) -> Infectious(x)) -> therefore Infectious(diena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Mathias is guyanese. Queada is unbound. Aina is not patient. If someone is unbound then they are disparate. Green people are guyanese. If someone is scalene then they are unbound. Queada is guyanese.", "logic": "\nGuyanese(mathias)\nUnbound(queada)\nnot Patient(aina)\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Guyanese(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Unbound(x))\n\nGuyanese(queada)\n\nUnbound(queada) and forall x (Unbound(x) -> Disparate(x)) -> therefore Disparate(queada) Disparate(queada) and forall x (Disparate(x) -> Guyanese(x)) -> therefore Guyanese(queada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Albrecht is tenable. Regen is defensive. Merci is not randomised. If someone is defensive then they are geodesic. Green people are tenable. If someone is slashing then they are defensive. Regen is not tenable.", "logic": "\nTenable(albrecht)\nDefensive(regen)\nnot Randomised(merci)\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Defensive(x))\n\nnot Tenable(regen)\n\nDefensive(regen) and forall x (Defensive(x) -> Geodesic(x)) -> therefore Geodesic(regen) Geodesic(regen) and forall x (Geodesic(x) -> Tenable(x)) -> therefore Tenable(regen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Selia is acneiform. Mikael is dashed. Ginni is not valiant. If someone is dashed then they are yeasty. Green people are acneiform. If someone is lettered then they are dashed. Ginni is not dashed.", "logic": "\nAcneiform(selia)\nDashed(mikael)\nnot Valiant(ginni)\nforall x (Dashed(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Dashed(x))\n\nnot Dashed(ginni)\n\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Dashed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Arliene is catenulate. Francisco is shrubby. Morly is not spectacled. If someone is shrubby then they are bovid. Green people are catenulate. If someone is unplaced then they are shrubby. Arliene is shrubby.", "logic": "\nCatenulate(arliene)\nShrubby(francisco)\nnot Spectacled(morly)\nforall x (Shrubby(x) -> Bovid(x))\nforall x (Bovid(x) -> Catenulate(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Shrubby(x))\n\nShrubby(arliene)\n\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Shrubby(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Cindra is booted. Konrad is molded. Colline is not heatless. If someone is molded then they are uncreative. Green people are booted. If someone is lentissimo then they are molded. Cindra is not uncreative.", "logic": "\nBooted(cindra)\nMolded(konrad)\nnot Heatless(colline)\nforall x (Molded(x) -> Uncreative(x))\nforall x (Uncreative(x) -> Booted(x))\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) -> Molded(x))\n\nnot Uncreative(cindra)\n\nforall x (Molded(x) -> Uncreative(x)) <- forall x (Lentissimo(x) -> Molded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Benni is crenate. Denis is flocculent. Clem is not moody. If someone is flocculent then they are greyish. Green people are crenate. If someone is packaged then they are flocculent. Benni is packaged.", "logic": "\nCrenate(benni)\nFlocculent(denis)\nnot Moody(clem)\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Greyish(x) -> Crenate(x))\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> Flocculent(x))\n\nPackaged(benni)\n\nPackaged(benni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Endora is corvine. Ricca is incendiary. Ender is not parve. If someone is incendiary then they are inexpiable. Green people are corvine. If someone is neat then they are incendiary. Ender is not smart.", "logic": "\nCorvine(endora)\nIncendiary(ricca)\nnot Parve(ender)\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> Inexpiable(x))\nforall x (Inexpiable(x) -> Corvine(x))\nforall x (Neat(x) -> Incendiary(x))\n\nnot Smart(ender)\n\nnot Smart(ender) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Tanney is pessimum. Robb is grungy. Cheri is not perpetual. If someone is grungy then they are corvine. Green people are pessimum. If someone is cylindric then they are grungy. Robb is cylindric.", "logic": "\nPessimum(tanney)\nGrungy(robb)\nnot Perpetual(cheri)\nforall x (Grungy(x) -> Corvine(x))\nforall x (Corvine(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Cylindric(x) -> Grungy(x))\n\nCylindric(robb)\n\nCylindric(robb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "The roxanna cabal the andee. The roxanna burke the tamarra. The roxanna is communist. The roxanna is boracic. The roxanna is nestorian. The andee cabal the erick. The andee burke the erick. The andee is communist. The tamarra burke the roxanna. The tamarra burke the andee. The tamarra is communist. The tamarra is nestorian. The erick cabal the andee. The erick burke the andee. The erick is dacitic. The erick abseil the roxanna. If something is boracic then it burke the tamarra. If something cabal the andee and it cabal the tamarra then the tamarra abseil the erick. If something burke the tamarra then the tamarra cabal the andee. If something burke the tamarra and it burke the roxanna then the tamarra cabal the andee. If the andee cabal the tamarra and the tamarra burke the erick then the erick is friendless. If something is boracic and it burke the roxanna then the roxanna cabal the tamarra. If the roxanna burke the andee then the andee cabal the tamarra. If something burke the andee then it cabal the tamarra. The andee burke the erick.", "logic": "\nCabal(roxanna, andee)\nBurke(roxanna, tamarra)\nCommunist(roxanna)\nBoracic(roxanna)\nNestorian(roxanna)\nCabal(andee, erick)\nBurke(andee, erick)\nCommunist(andee)\nBurke(tamarra, roxanna)\nBurke(tamarra, andee)\nCommunist(tamarra)\nNestorian(tamarra)\nCabal(erick, andee)\nBurke(erick, andee)\nDacitic(erick)\nAbseil(erick, roxanna)\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Burke(x, tamarra))\nforall x (Cabal(x, andee) and Cabal(x, tamarra) -> Abseil(tamarra, erick))\nforall x (Burke(x, tamarra) -> Cabal(tamarra, andee))\nforall x (Burke(x, tamarra) and Burke(x, roxanna) -> Cabal(tamarra, andee))\nCabal(andee, tamarra) and Burke(tamarra, erick) -> Friendless(erick)\nforall x (Boracic(x) and Burke(x, roxanna) -> Cabal(roxanna, tamarra))\nBurke(roxanna, andee) -> Cabal(andee, tamarra)\nforall x (Burke(x, andee) -> Cabal(x, tamarra))\n\nBurke(andee, erick)\n\ntherefore Burke(andee, erick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The gwyneth bemire the anson. The gwyneth overfeed the gustie. The gwyneth is refreshful. The gwyneth is infectious. The gwyneth is stabilized. The anson bemire the elsi. The anson overfeed the elsi. The anson is refreshful. The gustie overfeed the gwyneth. The gustie overfeed the anson. The gustie is refreshful. The gustie is stabilized. The elsi bemire the anson. The elsi overfeed the anson. The elsi is upstream. The elsi sugar the gwyneth. If something is infectious then it overfeed the gustie. If something bemire the anson and it bemire the gustie then the gustie sugar the elsi. If something overfeed the gustie then the gustie bemire the anson. If something overfeed the gustie and it overfeed the gwyneth then the gustie bemire the anson. If the anson bemire the gustie and the gustie overfeed the elsi then the elsi is discarded. If something is infectious and it overfeed the gwyneth then the gwyneth bemire the gustie. If the gwyneth overfeed the anson then the anson bemire the gustie. If something overfeed the anson then it bemire the gustie. The gwyneth is not infectious.", "logic": "\nBemire(gwyneth, anson)\nOverfeed(gwyneth, gustie)\nRefreshful(gwyneth)\nInfectious(gwyneth)\nStabilized(gwyneth)\nBemire(anson, elsi)\nOverfeed(anson, elsi)\nRefreshful(anson)\nOverfeed(gustie, gwyneth)\nOverfeed(gustie, anson)\nRefreshful(gustie)\nStabilized(gustie)\nBemire(elsi, anson)\nOverfeed(elsi, anson)\nUpstream(elsi)\nSugar(elsi, gwyneth)\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Overfeed(x, gustie))\nforall x (Bemire(x, anson) and Bemire(x, gustie) -> Sugar(gustie, elsi))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, gustie) -> Bemire(gustie, anson))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, gustie) and Overfeed(x, gwyneth) -> Bemire(gustie, anson))\nBemire(anson, gustie) and Overfeed(gustie, elsi) -> Discarded(elsi)\nforall x (Infectious(x) and Overfeed(x, gwyneth) -> Bemire(gwyneth, gustie))\nOverfeed(gwyneth, anson) -> Bemire(anson, gustie)\nforall x (Overfeed(x, anson) -> Bemire(x, gustie))\n\nnot Infectious(gwyneth)\n\ntherefore Infectious(gwyneth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The gustavo resist the nikolia. The gustavo rupture the marven. The gustavo is slav. The gustavo is binomial. The gustavo is outrigged. The nikolia resist the patsy. The nikolia rupture the patsy. The nikolia is slav. The marven rupture the gustavo. The marven rupture the nikolia. The marven is slav. The marven is outrigged. The patsy resist the nikolia. The patsy rupture the nikolia. The patsy is judicable. The patsy reef the gustavo. If something is binomial then it rupture the marven. If something resist the nikolia and it resist the marven then the marven reef the patsy. If something rupture the marven then the marven resist the nikolia. If something rupture the marven and it rupture the gustavo then the marven resist the nikolia. If the nikolia resist the marven and the marven rupture the patsy then the patsy is tubed. If something is binomial and it rupture the gustavo then the gustavo resist the marven. If the gustavo rupture the nikolia then the nikolia resist the marven. If something rupture the nikolia then it resist the marven. The marven resist the nikolia.", "logic": "\nResist(gustavo, nikolia)\nRupture(gustavo, marven)\nSlav(gustavo)\nBinomial(gustavo)\nOutrigged(gustavo)\nResist(nikolia, patsy)\nRupture(nikolia, patsy)\nSlav(nikolia)\nRupture(marven, gustavo)\nRupture(marven, nikolia)\nSlav(marven)\nOutrigged(marven)\nResist(patsy, nikolia)\nRupture(patsy, nikolia)\nJudicable(patsy)\nReef(patsy, gustavo)\nforall x (Binomial(x) -> Rupture(x, marven))\nforall x (Resist(x, nikolia) and Resist(x, marven) -> Reef(marven, patsy))\nforall x (Rupture(x, marven) -> Resist(marven, nikolia))\nforall x (Rupture(x, marven) and Rupture(x, gustavo) -> Resist(marven, nikolia))\nResist(nikolia, marven) and Rupture(marven, patsy) -> Tubed(patsy)\nforall x (Binomial(x) and Rupture(x, gustavo) -> Resist(gustavo, marven))\nRupture(gustavo, nikolia) -> Resist(nikolia, marven)\nforall x (Rupture(x, nikolia) -> Resist(x, marven))\n\nResist(marven, nikolia)\n\nRupture(gustavo, marven) and forall x (Rupture(x, marven) -> Resist(marven, nikolia)) -> therefore Resist(marven, nikolia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The lucie tucker the corenda. The lucie tint the kyrstin. The lucie is miasmal. The lucie is vinous. The lucie is sinitic. The corenda tucker the crysta. The corenda tint the crysta. The corenda is miasmal. The kyrstin tint the lucie. The kyrstin tint the corenda. The kyrstin is miasmal. The kyrstin is sinitic. The crysta tucker the corenda. The crysta tint the corenda. The crysta is thundering. The crysta semaphore the lucie. If something is vinous then it tint the kyrstin. If something tucker the corenda and it tucker the kyrstin then the kyrstin semaphore the crysta. If something tint the kyrstin then the kyrstin tucker the corenda. If something tint the kyrstin and it tint the lucie then the kyrstin tucker the corenda. If the corenda tucker the kyrstin and the kyrstin tint the crysta then the crysta is unlovely. If something is vinous and it tint the lucie then the lucie tucker the kyrstin. If the lucie tint the corenda then the corenda tucker the kyrstin. If something tint the corenda then it tucker the kyrstin. The kyrstin does not chase the kyrstin.", "logic": "\nTucker(lucie, corenda)\nTint(lucie, kyrstin)\nMiasmal(lucie)\nVinous(lucie)\nSinitic(lucie)\nTucker(corenda, crysta)\nTint(corenda, crysta)\nMiasmal(corenda)\nTint(kyrstin, lucie)\nTint(kyrstin, corenda)\nMiasmal(kyrstin)\nSinitic(kyrstin)\nTucker(crysta, corenda)\nTint(crysta, corenda)\nThundering(crysta)\nSemaphore(crysta, lucie)\nforall x (Vinous(x) -> Tint(x, kyrstin))\nforall x (Tucker(x, corenda) and Tucker(x, kyrstin) -> Semaphore(kyrstin, crysta))\nforall x (Tint(x, kyrstin) -> Tucker(kyrstin, corenda))\nforall x (Tint(x, kyrstin) and Tint(x, lucie) -> Tucker(kyrstin, corenda))\nTucker(corenda, kyrstin) and Tint(kyrstin, crysta) -> Unlovely(crysta)\nforall x (Vinous(x) and Tint(x, lucie) -> Tucker(lucie, kyrstin))\nTint(lucie, corenda) -> Tucker(corenda, kyrstin)\nforall x (Tint(x, corenda) -> Tucker(x, kyrstin))\n\nnot Tucker(kyrstin, kyrstin)\n\nTint(kyrstin, corenda) and forall x (Tint(x, corenda) -> Tucker(x, kyrstin)) -> therefore Tucker(kyrstin, kyrstin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The kyla unloosen the karly. The kyla institute the lauri. The kyla is dozy. The kyla is mitral. The kyla is tearaway. The karly unloosen the corella. The karly institute the corella. The karly is dozy. The lauri institute the kyla. The lauri institute the karly. The lauri is dozy. The lauri is tearaway. The corella unloosen the karly. The corella institute the karly. The corella is diminished. The corella resorb the kyla. If something is mitral then it institute the lauri. If something unloosen the karly and it unloosen the lauri then the lauri resorb the corella. If something institute the lauri then the lauri unloosen the karly. If something institute the lauri and it institute the kyla then the lauri unloosen the karly. If the karly unloosen the lauri and the lauri institute the corella then the corella is spry. If something is mitral and it institute the kyla then the kyla unloosen the lauri. If the kyla institute the karly then the karly unloosen the lauri. If something institute the karly then it unloosen the lauri. The lauri resorb the corella.", "logic": "\nUnloosen(kyla, karly)\nInstitute(kyla, lauri)\nDozy(kyla)\nMitral(kyla)\nTearaway(kyla)\nUnloosen(karly, corella)\nInstitute(karly, corella)\nDozy(karly)\nInstitute(lauri, kyla)\nInstitute(lauri, karly)\nDozy(lauri)\nTearaway(lauri)\nUnloosen(corella, karly)\nInstitute(corella, karly)\nDiminished(corella)\nResorb(corella, kyla)\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> Institute(x, lauri))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, karly) and Unloosen(x, lauri) -> Resorb(lauri, corella))\nforall x (Institute(x, lauri) -> Unloosen(lauri, karly))\nforall x (Institute(x, lauri) and Institute(x, kyla) -> Unloosen(lauri, karly))\nUnloosen(karly, lauri) and Institute(lauri, corella) -> Spry(corella)\nforall x (Mitral(x) and Institute(x, kyla) -> Unloosen(kyla, lauri))\nInstitute(kyla, karly) -> Unloosen(karly, lauri)\nforall x (Institute(x, karly) -> Unloosen(x, lauri))\n\nResorb(lauri, corella)\n\nInstitute(corella, karly) and forall x (Institute(x, karly) -> Unloosen(x, lauri)) -> therefore Unloosen(corella, lauri) Unloosen(corella, karly) and Unloosen(corella, lauri) and forall x (Unloosen(x, karly) and Unloosen(x, lauri) -> Resorb(lauri, corella)) -> therefore Resorb(lauri, corella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The marylee handwrite the lothar. The marylee castrate the dora. The marylee is fiberoptic. The marylee is projecting. The marylee is stillborn. The lothar handwrite the eydie. The lothar castrate the eydie. The lothar is fiberoptic. The dora castrate the marylee. The dora castrate the lothar. The dora is fiberoptic. The dora is stillborn. The eydie handwrite the lothar. The eydie castrate the lothar. The eydie is capacitive. The eydie skewer the marylee. If something is projecting then it castrate the dora. If something handwrite the lothar and it handwrite the dora then the dora skewer the eydie. If something castrate the dora then the dora handwrite the lothar. If something castrate the dora and it castrate the marylee then the dora handwrite the lothar. If the lothar handwrite the dora and the dora castrate the eydie then the eydie is subgross. If something is projecting and it castrate the marylee then the marylee handwrite the dora. If the marylee castrate the lothar then the lothar handwrite the dora. If something castrate the lothar then it handwrite the dora. The dora does not see the eydie.", "logic": "\nHandwrite(marylee, lothar)\nCastrate(marylee, dora)\nFiberoptic(marylee)\nProjecting(marylee)\nStillborn(marylee)\nHandwrite(lothar, eydie)\nCastrate(lothar, eydie)\nFiberoptic(lothar)\nCastrate(dora, marylee)\nCastrate(dora, lothar)\nFiberoptic(dora)\nStillborn(dora)\nHandwrite(eydie, lothar)\nCastrate(eydie, lothar)\nCapacitive(eydie)\nSkewer(eydie, marylee)\nforall x (Projecting(x) -> Castrate(x, dora))\nforall x (Handwrite(x, lothar) and Handwrite(x, dora) -> Skewer(dora, eydie))\nforall x (Castrate(x, dora) -> Handwrite(dora, lothar))\nforall x (Castrate(x, dora) and Castrate(x, marylee) -> Handwrite(dora, lothar))\nHandwrite(lothar, dora) and Castrate(dora, eydie) -> Subgross(eydie)\nforall x (Projecting(x) and Castrate(x, marylee) -> Handwrite(marylee, dora))\nCastrate(marylee, lothar) -> Handwrite(lothar, dora)\nforall x (Castrate(x, lothar) -> Handwrite(x, dora))\n\nnot Skewer(dora, eydie)\n\nCastrate(eydie, lothar) and forall x (Castrate(x, lothar) -> Handwrite(x, dora)) -> therefore Handwrite(eydie, dora) Handwrite(eydie, lothar) and Handwrite(eydie, dora) and forall x (Handwrite(x, lothar) and Handwrite(x, dora) -> Skewer(dora, eydie)) -> therefore Skewer(dora, eydie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The kial reaffirm the therese. The kial aggregate the lottie. The kial is focal. The kial is hipped. The kial is ascending. The therese reaffirm the harcourt. The therese aggregate the harcourt. The therese is focal. The lottie aggregate the kial. The lottie aggregate the therese. The lottie is focal. The lottie is ascending. The harcourt reaffirm the therese. The harcourt aggregate the therese. The harcourt is choky. The harcourt snare the kial. If something is hipped then it aggregate the lottie. If something reaffirm the therese and it reaffirm the lottie then the lottie snare the harcourt. If something aggregate the lottie then the lottie reaffirm the therese. If something aggregate the lottie and it aggregate the kial then the lottie reaffirm the therese. If the therese reaffirm the lottie and the lottie aggregate the harcourt then the harcourt is advisable. If something is hipped and it aggregate the kial then the kial reaffirm the lottie. If the kial aggregate the therese then the therese reaffirm the lottie. If something aggregate the therese then it reaffirm the lottie. The kial does not chase the lottie.", "logic": "\nReaffirm(kial, therese)\nAggregate(kial, lottie)\nFocal(kial)\nHipped(kial)\nAscending(kial)\nReaffirm(therese, harcourt)\nAggregate(therese, harcourt)\nFocal(therese)\nAggregate(lottie, kial)\nAggregate(lottie, therese)\nFocal(lottie)\nAscending(lottie)\nReaffirm(harcourt, therese)\nAggregate(harcourt, therese)\nChoky(harcourt)\nSnare(harcourt, kial)\nforall x (Hipped(x) -> Aggregate(x, lottie))\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, therese) and Reaffirm(x, lottie) -> Snare(lottie, harcourt))\nforall x (Aggregate(x, lottie) -> Reaffirm(lottie, therese))\nforall x (Aggregate(x, lottie) and Aggregate(x, kial) -> Reaffirm(lottie, therese))\nReaffirm(therese, lottie) and Aggregate(lottie, harcourt) -> Advisable(harcourt)\nforall x (Hipped(x) and Aggregate(x, kial) -> Reaffirm(kial, lottie))\nAggregate(kial, therese) -> Reaffirm(therese, lottie)\nforall x (Aggregate(x, therese) -> Reaffirm(x, lottie))\n\nnot Reaffirm(kial, lottie)\n\nforall x (Hipped(x) and Aggregate(x, kial) -> Reaffirm(kial, lottie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The darcy weld the eduard. The darcy thump the natassia. The darcy is seaworthy. The darcy is unsigned. The darcy is compounded. The eduard weld the berta. The eduard thump the berta. The eduard is seaworthy. The natassia thump the darcy. The natassia thump the eduard. The natassia is seaworthy. The natassia is compounded. The berta weld the eduard. The berta thump the eduard. The berta is boastful. The berta surfboard the darcy. If something is unsigned then it thump the natassia. If something weld the eduard and it weld the natassia then the natassia surfboard the berta. If something thump the natassia then the natassia weld the eduard. If something thump the natassia and it thump the darcy then the natassia weld the eduard. If the eduard weld the natassia and the natassia thump the berta then the berta is unclear. If something is unsigned and it thump the darcy then the darcy weld the natassia. If the darcy thump the eduard then the eduard weld the natassia. If something thump the eduard then it weld the natassia. The natassia thump the natassia.", "logic": "\nWeld(darcy, eduard)\nThump(darcy, natassia)\nSeaworthy(darcy)\nUnsigned(darcy)\nCompounded(darcy)\nWeld(eduard, berta)\nThump(eduard, berta)\nSeaworthy(eduard)\nThump(natassia, darcy)\nThump(natassia, eduard)\nSeaworthy(natassia)\nCompounded(natassia)\nWeld(berta, eduard)\nThump(berta, eduard)\nBoastful(berta)\nSurfboard(berta, darcy)\nforall x (Unsigned(x) -> Thump(x, natassia))\nforall x (Weld(x, eduard) and Weld(x, natassia) -> Surfboard(natassia, berta))\nforall x (Thump(x, natassia) -> Weld(natassia, eduard))\nforall x (Thump(x, natassia) and Thump(x, darcy) -> Weld(natassia, eduard))\nWeld(eduard, natassia) and Thump(natassia, berta) -> Unclear(berta)\nforall x (Unsigned(x) and Thump(x, darcy) -> Weld(darcy, natassia))\nThump(darcy, eduard) -> Weld(eduard, natassia)\nforall x (Thump(x, eduard) -> Weld(x, natassia))\n\nThump(natassia, natassia)\n\nforall x (Unsigned(x) -> Thump(x, natassia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The natalie lucubrate the andre. The natalie prejudge the romonda. The natalie is pyaemic. The natalie is lame. The natalie is touchy. The andre lucubrate the tim. The andre prejudge the tim. The andre is pyaemic. The romonda prejudge the natalie. The romonda prejudge the andre. The romonda is pyaemic. The romonda is touchy. The tim lucubrate the andre. The tim prejudge the andre. The tim is overlooked. The tim bilk the natalie. If something is lame then it prejudge the romonda. If something lucubrate the andre and it lucubrate the romonda then the romonda bilk the tim. If something prejudge the romonda then the romonda lucubrate the andre. If something prejudge the romonda and it prejudge the natalie then the romonda lucubrate the andre. If the andre lucubrate the romonda and the romonda prejudge the tim then the tim is uneducated. If something is lame and it prejudge the natalie then the natalie lucubrate the romonda. If the natalie prejudge the andre then the andre lucubrate the romonda. If something prejudge the andre then it lucubrate the romonda. The tim does not eat the romonda.", "logic": "\nLucubrate(natalie, andre)\nPrejudge(natalie, romonda)\nPyaemic(natalie)\nLame(natalie)\nTouchy(natalie)\nLucubrate(andre, tim)\nPrejudge(andre, tim)\nPyaemic(andre)\nPrejudge(romonda, natalie)\nPrejudge(romonda, andre)\nPyaemic(romonda)\nTouchy(romonda)\nLucubrate(tim, andre)\nPrejudge(tim, andre)\nOverlooked(tim)\nBilk(tim, natalie)\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Prejudge(x, romonda))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, andre) and Lucubrate(x, romonda) -> Bilk(romonda, tim))\nforall x (Prejudge(x, romonda) -> Lucubrate(romonda, andre))\nforall x (Prejudge(x, romonda) and Prejudge(x, natalie) -> Lucubrate(romonda, andre))\nLucubrate(andre, romonda) and Prejudge(romonda, tim) -> Uneducated(tim)\nforall x (Lame(x) and Prejudge(x, natalie) -> Lucubrate(natalie, romonda))\nPrejudge(natalie, andre) -> Lucubrate(andre, romonda)\nforall x (Prejudge(x, andre) -> Lucubrate(x, romonda))\n\nnot Prejudge(tim, romonda)\n\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Prejudge(x, romonda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The worth talk the pauly. The worth reassert the thadeus. The worth is unwanted. The worth is kyphotic. The worth is besieged. The pauly talk the gwenora. The pauly reassert the gwenora. The pauly is unwanted. The thadeus reassert the worth. The thadeus reassert the pauly. The thadeus is unwanted. The thadeus is besieged. The gwenora talk the pauly. The gwenora reassert the pauly. The gwenora is rhizoidal. The gwenora abhor the worth. If something is kyphotic then it reassert the thadeus. If something talk the pauly and it talk the thadeus then the thadeus abhor the gwenora. If something reassert the thadeus then the thadeus talk the pauly. If something reassert the thadeus and it reassert the worth then the thadeus talk the pauly. If the pauly talk the thadeus and the thadeus reassert the gwenora then the gwenora is uveous. If something is kyphotic and it reassert the worth then the worth talk the thadeus. If the worth reassert the pauly then the pauly talk the thadeus. If something reassert the pauly then it talk the thadeus. The pauly abhor the thadeus.", "logic": "\nTalk(worth, pauly)\nReassert(worth, thadeus)\nUnwanted(worth)\nKyphotic(worth)\nBesieged(worth)\nTalk(pauly, gwenora)\nReassert(pauly, gwenora)\nUnwanted(pauly)\nReassert(thadeus, worth)\nReassert(thadeus, pauly)\nUnwanted(thadeus)\nBesieged(thadeus)\nTalk(gwenora, pauly)\nReassert(gwenora, pauly)\nRhizoidal(gwenora)\nAbhor(gwenora, worth)\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) -> Reassert(x, thadeus))\nforall x (Talk(x, pauly) and Talk(x, thadeus) -> Abhor(thadeus, gwenora))\nforall x (Reassert(x, thadeus) -> Talk(thadeus, pauly))\nforall x (Reassert(x, thadeus) and Reassert(x, worth) -> Talk(thadeus, pauly))\nTalk(pauly, thadeus) and Reassert(thadeus, gwenora) -> Uveous(gwenora)\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) and Reassert(x, worth) -> Talk(worth, thadeus))\nReassert(worth, pauly) -> Talk(pauly, thadeus)\nforall x (Reassert(x, pauly) -> Talk(x, thadeus))\n\nAbhor(pauly, thadeus)\n\nAbhor(pauly, thadeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The dmitri ablactate the hakeem. The dmitri berry the tarah. The dmitri is stirring. The dmitri is forbidding. The dmitri is franciscan. The hakeem ablactate the batsheva. The hakeem berry the batsheva. The hakeem is stirring. The tarah berry the dmitri. The tarah berry the hakeem. The tarah is stirring. The tarah is franciscan. The batsheva ablactate the hakeem. The batsheva berry the hakeem. The batsheva is ubiquitous. The batsheva overpraise the dmitri. If something is forbidding then it berry the tarah. If something ablactate the hakeem and it ablactate the tarah then the tarah overpraise the batsheva. If something berry the tarah then the tarah ablactate the hakeem. If something berry the tarah and it berry the dmitri then the tarah ablactate the hakeem. If the hakeem ablactate the tarah and the tarah berry the batsheva then the batsheva is saintly. If something is forbidding and it berry the dmitri then the dmitri ablactate the tarah. If the dmitri berry the hakeem then the hakeem ablactate the tarah. If something berry the hakeem then it ablactate the tarah. The batsheva does not see the batsheva.", "logic": "\nAblactate(dmitri, hakeem)\nBerry(dmitri, tarah)\nStirring(dmitri)\nForbidding(dmitri)\nFranciscan(dmitri)\nAblactate(hakeem, batsheva)\nBerry(hakeem, batsheva)\nStirring(hakeem)\nBerry(tarah, dmitri)\nBerry(tarah, hakeem)\nStirring(tarah)\nFranciscan(tarah)\nAblactate(batsheva, hakeem)\nBerry(batsheva, hakeem)\nUbiquitous(batsheva)\nOverpraise(batsheva, dmitri)\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Berry(x, tarah))\nforall x (Ablactate(x, hakeem) and Ablactate(x, tarah) -> Overpraise(tarah, batsheva))\nforall x (Berry(x, tarah) -> Ablactate(tarah, hakeem))\nforall x (Berry(x, tarah) and Berry(x, dmitri) -> Ablactate(tarah, hakeem))\nAblactate(hakeem, tarah) and Berry(tarah, batsheva) -> Saintly(batsheva)\nforall x (Forbidding(x) and Berry(x, dmitri) -> Ablactate(dmitri, tarah))\nBerry(dmitri, hakeem) -> Ablactate(hakeem, tarah)\nforall x (Berry(x, hakeem) -> Ablactate(x, tarah))\n\nnot Overpraise(batsheva, batsheva)\n\nnot Overpraise(batsheva, batsheva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "The kalil counteract the sheeree. The kalil subtilize the madeleine. The kalil is subscribed. The kalil is tenderized. The kalil is unshaded. The sheeree counteract the clifton. The sheeree subtilize the clifton. The sheeree is subscribed. The madeleine subtilize the kalil. The madeleine subtilize the sheeree. The madeleine is subscribed. The madeleine is unshaded. The clifton counteract the sheeree. The clifton subtilize the sheeree. The clifton is phantasmal. The clifton braid the kalil. If something is tenderized then it subtilize the madeleine. If something counteract the sheeree and it counteract the madeleine then the madeleine braid the clifton. If something subtilize the madeleine then the madeleine counteract the sheeree. If something subtilize the madeleine and it subtilize the kalil then the madeleine counteract the sheeree. If the sheeree counteract the madeleine and the madeleine subtilize the clifton then the clifton is medical. If something is tenderized and it subtilize the kalil then the kalil counteract the madeleine. If the kalil subtilize the sheeree then the sheeree counteract the madeleine. If something subtilize the sheeree then it counteract the madeleine. The sheeree counteract the kalil.", "logic": "\nCounteract(kalil, sheeree)\nSubtilize(kalil, madeleine)\nSubscribed(kalil)\nTenderized(kalil)\nUnshaded(kalil)\nCounteract(sheeree, clifton)\nSubtilize(sheeree, clifton)\nSubscribed(sheeree)\nSubtilize(madeleine, kalil)\nSubtilize(madeleine, sheeree)\nSubscribed(madeleine)\nUnshaded(madeleine)\nCounteract(clifton, sheeree)\nSubtilize(clifton, sheeree)\nPhantasmal(clifton)\nBraid(clifton, kalil)\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Subtilize(x, madeleine))\nforall x (Counteract(x, sheeree) and Counteract(x, madeleine) -> Braid(madeleine, clifton))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, madeleine) -> Counteract(madeleine, sheeree))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, madeleine) and Subtilize(x, kalil) -> Counteract(madeleine, sheeree))\nCounteract(sheeree, madeleine) and Subtilize(madeleine, clifton) -> Medical(clifton)\nforall x (Tenderized(x) and Subtilize(x, kalil) -> Counteract(kalil, madeleine))\nSubtilize(kalil, sheeree) -> Counteract(sheeree, madeleine)\nforall x (Subtilize(x, sheeree) -> Counteract(x, madeleine))\n\nCounteract(sheeree, kalil)\n\nCounteract(sheeree, kalil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-978"} {"premises": "Mayda is unharmed. Fidel is cometic. Fidel is unwitting. Fidel is unharmed. Luna is allophonic. Luna is unharmed. Luna is zonary. If someone is zonary then they are unwitting. Cold people are competent. All baffling, zonary people are unharmed. If someone is allophonic then they are cometic. If someone is cometic then they are allophonic. If Mayda is competent then Mayda is baffling. Luna is unharmed.", "logic": "\nUnharmed(mayda)\nCometic(fidel)\nUnwitting(fidel)\nUnharmed(fidel)\nAllophonic(luna)\nUnharmed(luna)\nZonary(luna)\nforall x (Zonary(x) -> Unwitting(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) -> Competent(x))\nforall x (Baffling(x) and Zonary(x) -> Unharmed(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) -> Cometic(x))\nforall x (Cometic(x) -> Allophonic(x))\nCompetent(mayda) -> Baffling(mayda)\n\nUnharmed(luna)\n\ntherefore Unharmed(luna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Way is tanned. Sid is puzzling. Sid is timorese. Sid is tanned. Lurline is assuming. Lurline is tanned. Lurline is demented. If someone is demented then they are timorese. Cold people are venereal. All unbeatable, demented people are tanned. If someone is assuming then they are puzzling. If someone is puzzling then they are assuming. If Way is venereal then Way is unbeatable. Lurline is not tanned.", "logic": "\nTanned(way)\nPuzzling(sid)\nTimorese(sid)\nTanned(sid)\nAssuming(lurline)\nTanned(lurline)\nDemented(lurline)\nforall x (Demented(x) -> Timorese(x))\nforall x (Assuming(x) -> Venereal(x))\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) and Demented(x) -> Tanned(x))\nforall x (Assuming(x) -> Puzzling(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) -> Assuming(x))\nVenereal(way) -> Unbeatable(way)\n\nnot Tanned(lurline)\n\ntherefore Tanned(lurline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Yevette is undeclared. Denis is aging. Denis is honored. Denis is undeclared. Joelle is elliptic. Joelle is undeclared. Joelle is hooved. If someone is hooved then they are honored. Cold people are baroque. All toilsome, hooved people are undeclared. If someone is elliptic then they are aging. If someone is aging then they are elliptic. If Yevette is baroque then Yevette is toilsome. Joelle is honored.", "logic": "\nUndeclared(yevette)\nAging(denis)\nHonored(denis)\nUndeclared(denis)\nElliptic(joelle)\nUndeclared(joelle)\nHooved(joelle)\nforall x (Hooved(x) -> Honored(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Baroque(x))\nforall x (Toilsome(x) and Hooved(x) -> Undeclared(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Aging(x) -> Elliptic(x))\nBaroque(yevette) -> Toilsome(yevette)\n\nHonored(joelle)\n\nHooved(joelle) and forall x (Hooved(x) -> Honored(x)) -> therefore Honored(joelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Bartlet is strategic. Kristian is moronic. Kristian is capital. Kristian is strategic. Dianna is said. Dianna is strategic. Dianna is thrown. If someone is thrown then they are capital. Cold people are cragged. All curative, thrown people are strategic. If someone is said then they are moronic. If someone is moronic then they are said. If Bartlet is cragged then Bartlet is curative. Dianna is not cragged.", "logic": "\nStrategic(bartlet)\nMoronic(kristian)\nCapital(kristian)\nStrategic(kristian)\nSaid(dianna)\nStrategic(dianna)\nThrown(dianna)\nforall x (Thrown(x) -> Capital(x))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Curative(x) and Thrown(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Moronic(x))\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Said(x))\nCragged(bartlet) -> Curative(bartlet)\n\nnot Cragged(dianna)\n\nSaid(dianna) and forall x (Said(x) -> Cragged(x)) -> therefore Cragged(dianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Harriet is ovular. Emogene is guileless. Emogene is sixfold. Emogene is ovular. Hedvig is vast. Hedvig is ovular. Hedvig is ceilinged. If someone is ceilinged then they are sixfold. Cold people are inimitable. All hydroponic, ceilinged people are ovular. If someone is vast then they are guileless. If someone is guileless then they are vast. If Harriet is inimitable then Harriet is hydroponic. Emogene is inimitable.", "logic": "\nOvular(harriet)\nGuileless(emogene)\nSixfold(emogene)\nOvular(emogene)\nVast(hedvig)\nOvular(hedvig)\nCeilinged(hedvig)\nforall x (Ceilinged(x) -> Sixfold(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) -> Inimitable(x))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) and Ceilinged(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> Vast(x))\nInimitable(harriet) -> Hydroponic(harriet)\n\nInimitable(emogene)\n\nGuileless(emogene) and forall x (Guileless(x) -> Vast(x)) -> therefore Vast(emogene) Vast(emogene) and forall x (Vast(x) -> Inimitable(x)) -> therefore Inimitable(emogene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Doti is ropey. Mureil is nonelected. Mureil is bushed. Mureil is ropey. Geraldina is bitter. Geraldina is ropey. Geraldina is rational. If someone is rational then they are bushed. Cold people are soapy. All fabricated, rational people are ropey. If someone is bitter then they are nonelected. If someone is nonelected then they are bitter. If Doti is soapy then Doti is fabricated. Mureil is not soapy.", "logic": "\nRopey(doti)\nNonelected(mureil)\nBushed(mureil)\nRopey(mureil)\nBitter(geraldina)\nRopey(geraldina)\nRational(geraldina)\nforall x (Rational(x) -> Bushed(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Fabricated(x) and Rational(x) -> Ropey(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) -> Bitter(x))\nSoapy(doti) -> Fabricated(doti)\n\nnot Soapy(mureil)\n\nNonelected(mureil) and forall x (Nonelected(x) -> Bitter(x)) -> therefore Bitter(mureil) Bitter(mureil) and forall x (Bitter(x) -> Soapy(x)) -> therefore Soapy(mureil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Penelopa is unleaded. Ciel is apologetic. Ciel is omani. Ciel is unleaded. Rafaelita is computable. Rafaelita is unleaded. Rafaelita is shapely. If someone is shapely then they are omani. Cold people are clustered. All blithe, shapely people are unleaded. If someone is computable then they are apologetic. If someone is apologetic then they are computable. If Penelopa is clustered then Penelopa is blithe. Penelopa is not omani.", "logic": "\nUnleaded(penelopa)\nApologetic(ciel)\nOmani(ciel)\nUnleaded(ciel)\nComputable(rafaelita)\nUnleaded(rafaelita)\nShapely(rafaelita)\nforall x (Shapely(x) -> Omani(x))\nforall x (Computable(x) -> Clustered(x))\nforall x (Blithe(x) and Shapely(x) -> Unleaded(x))\nforall x (Computable(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Computable(x))\nClustered(penelopa) -> Blithe(penelopa)\n\nnot Omani(penelopa)\n\nforall x (Shapely(x) -> Omani(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Marrissa is ingrowing. Shell is hooked. Shell is melanesian. Shell is ingrowing. Nonna is supportive. Nonna is ingrowing. Nonna is demotic. If someone is demotic then they are melanesian. Cold people are toothlike. All radiate, demotic people are ingrowing. If someone is supportive then they are hooked. If someone is hooked then they are supportive. If Marrissa is toothlike then Marrissa is radiate. Marrissa is radiate.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(marrissa)\nHooked(shell)\nMelanesian(shell)\nIngrowing(shell)\nSupportive(nonna)\nIngrowing(nonna)\nDemotic(nonna)\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Melanesian(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) -> Toothlike(x))\nforall x (Radiate(x) and Demotic(x) -> Ingrowing(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) -> Supportive(x))\nToothlike(marrissa) -> Radiate(marrissa)\n\nRadiate(marrissa)\n\nToothlike(marrissa) -> Radiate(marrissa) <- forall x (Supportive(x) -> Toothlike(x)) <- forall x (Hooked(x) -> Supportive(x)) <- forall x (Supportive(x) -> Hooked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Celestia is endocrine. Reza is paranoid. Reza is astylar. Reza is endocrine. Dari is bismuthal. Dari is endocrine. Dari is bald. If someone is bald then they are astylar. Cold people are reliant. All unfirm, bald people are endocrine. If someone is bismuthal then they are paranoid. If someone is paranoid then they are bismuthal. If Celestia is reliant then Celestia is unfirm. Celestia is not paranoid.", "logic": "\nEndocrine(celestia)\nParanoid(reza)\nAstylar(reza)\nEndocrine(reza)\nBismuthal(dari)\nEndocrine(dari)\nBald(dari)\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Astylar(x))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Bald(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) -> Bismuthal(x))\nReliant(celestia) -> Unfirm(celestia)\n\nnot Paranoid(celestia)\n\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) -> Paranoid(x)) <- forall x (Paranoid(x) -> Bismuthal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Angus is chassidic. Winnah is bungled. Winnah is meagre. Winnah is chassidic. Cary is tiring. Cary is chassidic. Cary is phlegmy. If someone is phlegmy then they are meagre. Cold people are tramontane. All snarled, phlegmy people are chassidic. If someone is tiring then they are bungled. If someone is bungled then they are tiring. If Angus is tramontane then Angus is snarled. Winnah is snarled.", "logic": "\nChassidic(angus)\nBungled(winnah)\nMeagre(winnah)\nChassidic(winnah)\nTiring(cary)\nChassidic(cary)\nPhlegmy(cary)\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) -> Meagre(x))\nforall x (Tiring(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Snarled(x) and Phlegmy(x) -> Chassidic(x))\nforall x (Tiring(x) -> Bungled(x))\nforall x (Bungled(x) -> Tiring(x))\nTramontane(angus) -> Snarled(angus)\n\nSnarled(winnah)\n\nSnarled(winnah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Hellene is squishy. Wilbert is executable. Wilbert is hardline. Wilbert is squishy. Stephan is cheering. Stephan is squishy. Stephan is corrupt. If someone is corrupt then they are hardline. Cold people are bayesian. All soapy, corrupt people are squishy. If someone is cheering then they are executable. If someone is executable then they are cheering. If Hellene is bayesian then Hellene is soapy. Wilbert is not corrupt.", "logic": "\nSquishy(hellene)\nExecutable(wilbert)\nHardline(wilbert)\nSquishy(wilbert)\nCheering(stephan)\nSquishy(stephan)\nCorrupt(stephan)\nforall x (Corrupt(x) -> Hardline(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) -> Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) and Corrupt(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Executable(x) -> Cheering(x))\nBayesian(hellene) -> Soapy(hellene)\n\nnot Corrupt(wilbert)\n\nnot Corrupt(wilbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Prasad is aslope. Laird is titular. Laird is profound. Laird is aslope. Cherrita is lxxviii. Cherrita is aslope. Cherrita is alloyed. If someone is alloyed then they are profound. Cold people are unbowed. All rickety, alloyed people are aslope. If someone is lxxviii then they are titular. If someone is titular then they are lxxviii. If Prasad is unbowed then Prasad is rickety. Prasad is alloyed.", "logic": "\nAslope(prasad)\nTitular(laird)\nProfound(laird)\nAslope(laird)\nLxxviii(cherrita)\nAslope(cherrita)\nAlloyed(cherrita)\nforall x (Alloyed(x) -> Profound(x))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Rickety(x) and Alloyed(x) -> Aslope(x))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nUnbowed(prasad) -> Rickety(prasad)\n\nAlloyed(prasad)\n\nAlloyed(prasad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2328"} {"premises": "Guenna is fabled. Guenna is unbalanced. Guenna is goddamn. Guenna is bladed. Guenna is cleansing. Delbert is not fabled. Delbert is not holey. Delbert is unbalanced. Delbert is goddamn. Delbert is bladed. Gianina is fabled. Gianina is bladed. Gianina is cleansing. Adrien is holey. Adrien is bladed. If Adrien is unbalanced then Adrien is not holey. All polychrome people are cleansing. If someone is fabled and not bladed then they are cleansing. Blue people are fabled. Smart, cleansing people are polychrome. If someone is fabled then they are polychrome. If someone is unbalanced and holey then they are not polychrome. If Gianina is polychrome and Gianina is not unbalanced then Gianina is not holey. Guenna is bladed.", "logic": "\nFabled(guenna)\nUnbalanced(guenna)\nGoddamn(guenna)\nBladed(guenna)\nCleansing(guenna)\nnot Fabled(delbert)\nnot Holey(delbert)\nUnbalanced(delbert)\nGoddamn(delbert)\nBladed(delbert)\nFabled(gianina)\nBladed(gianina)\nCleansing(gianina)\nHoley(adrien)\nBladed(adrien)\nUnbalanced(adrien) -> not Holey(adrien)\nforall x (Polychrome(x) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) and not Bladed(x) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Holey(x) -> Fabled(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) and Cleansing(x) -> Polychrome(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) -> Polychrome(x))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) and Holey(x) -> not Polychrome(x))\nPolychrome(gianina) and not Unbalanced(gianina) -> not Holey(gianina)\n\nBladed(guenna)\n\ntherefore Bladed(guenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Bridget is lecherous. Bridget is dentate. Bridget is rawboned. Bridget is restless. Bridget is cultivable. Nancee is not lecherous. Nancee is not rhizoidal. Nancee is dentate. Nancee is rawboned. Nancee is restless. Linnet is lecherous. Linnet is restless. Linnet is cultivable. Roseline is rhizoidal. Roseline is restless. If Roseline is dentate then Roseline is not rhizoidal. All wizened people are cultivable. If someone is lecherous and not restless then they are cultivable. Blue people are lecherous. Smart, cultivable people are wizened. If someone is lecherous then they are wizened. If someone is dentate and rhizoidal then they are not wizened. If Linnet is wizened and Linnet is not dentate then Linnet is not rhizoidal. Bridget is not dentate.", "logic": "\nLecherous(bridget)\nDentate(bridget)\nRawboned(bridget)\nRestless(bridget)\nCultivable(bridget)\nnot Lecherous(nancee)\nnot Rhizoidal(nancee)\nDentate(nancee)\nRawboned(nancee)\nRestless(nancee)\nLecherous(linnet)\nRestless(linnet)\nCultivable(linnet)\nRhizoidal(roseline)\nRestless(roseline)\nDentate(roseline) -> not Rhizoidal(roseline)\nforall x (Wizened(x) -> Cultivable(x))\nforall x (Lecherous(x) and not Restless(x) -> Cultivable(x))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nforall x (Restless(x) and Cultivable(x) -> Wizened(x))\nforall x (Lecherous(x) -> Wizened(x))\nforall x (Dentate(x) and Rhizoidal(x) -> not Wizened(x))\nWizened(linnet) and not Dentate(linnet) -> not Rhizoidal(linnet)\n\nnot Dentate(bridget)\n\ntherefore Dentate(bridget)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Christal is loaded. Christal is homeric. Christal is deictic. Christal is dilettante. Christal is libellous. Salli is not loaded. Salli is not convivial. Salli is homeric. Salli is deictic. Salli is dilettante. Lyda is loaded. Lyda is dilettante. Lyda is libellous. Dominic is convivial. Dominic is dilettante. If Dominic is homeric then Dominic is not convivial. All loverlike people are libellous. If someone is loaded and not dilettante then they are libellous. Blue people are loaded. Smart, libellous people are loverlike. If someone is loaded then they are loverlike. If someone is homeric and convivial then they are not loverlike. If Lyda is loverlike and Lyda is not homeric then Lyda is not convivial. Christal is loverlike.", "logic": "\nLoaded(christal)\nHomeric(christal)\nDeictic(christal)\nDilettante(christal)\nLibellous(christal)\nnot Loaded(salli)\nnot Convivial(salli)\nHomeric(salli)\nDeictic(salli)\nDilettante(salli)\nLoaded(lyda)\nDilettante(lyda)\nLibellous(lyda)\nConvivial(dominic)\nDilettante(dominic)\nHomeric(dominic) -> not Convivial(dominic)\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Libellous(x))\nforall x (Loaded(x) and not Dilettante(x) -> Libellous(x))\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Loaded(x))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) and Libellous(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Loaded(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Homeric(x) and Convivial(x) -> not Loverlike(x))\nLoverlike(lyda) and not Homeric(lyda) -> not Convivial(lyda)\n\nLoverlike(christal)\n\nLoaded(christal) and forall x (Loaded(x) -> Loverlike(x)) -> therefore Loverlike(christal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Brena is blighted. Brena is bunchy. Brena is unhuman. Brena is unstinted. Brena is erstwhile. Jennilee is not blighted. Jennilee is not acronymic. Jennilee is bunchy. Jennilee is unhuman. Jennilee is unstinted. Virginie is blighted. Virginie is unstinted. Virginie is erstwhile. Dea is acronymic. Dea is unstinted. If Dea is bunchy then Dea is not acronymic. All saturnine people are erstwhile. If someone is blighted and not unstinted then they are erstwhile. Blue people are blighted. Smart, erstwhile people are saturnine. If someone is blighted then they are saturnine. If someone is bunchy and acronymic then they are not saturnine. If Virginie is saturnine and Virginie is not bunchy then Virginie is not acronymic. Dea is not blighted.", "logic": "\nBlighted(brena)\nBunchy(brena)\nUnhuman(brena)\nUnstinted(brena)\nErstwhile(brena)\nnot Blighted(jennilee)\nnot Acronymic(jennilee)\nBunchy(jennilee)\nUnhuman(jennilee)\nUnstinted(jennilee)\nBlighted(virginie)\nUnstinted(virginie)\nErstwhile(virginie)\nAcronymic(dea)\nUnstinted(dea)\nBunchy(dea) -> not Acronymic(dea)\nforall x (Saturnine(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Blighted(x) and not Unstinted(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Acronymic(x) -> Blighted(x))\nforall x (Unstinted(x) and Erstwhile(x) -> Saturnine(x))\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Saturnine(x))\nforall x (Bunchy(x) and Acronymic(x) -> not Saturnine(x))\nSaturnine(virginie) and not Bunchy(virginie) -> not Acronymic(virginie)\n\nnot Blighted(dea)\n\nAcronymic(dea) and forall x (Acronymic(x) -> Blighted(x)) -> therefore Blighted(dea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Casandra is hempen. Casandra is placid. Casandra is biaural. Casandra is darned. Casandra is yucky. Kaylyn is not hempen. Kaylyn is not orderly. Kaylyn is placid. Kaylyn is biaural. Kaylyn is darned. Jerold is hempen. Jerold is darned. Jerold is yucky. Analise is orderly. Analise is darned. If Analise is placid then Analise is not orderly. All aghast people are yucky. If someone is hempen and not darned then they are yucky. Blue people are hempen. Smart, yucky people are aghast. If someone is hempen then they are aghast. If someone is placid and orderly then they are not aghast. If Jerold is aghast and Jerold is not placid then Jerold is not orderly. Analise is aghast.", "logic": "\nHempen(casandra)\nPlacid(casandra)\nBiaural(casandra)\nDarned(casandra)\nYucky(casandra)\nnot Hempen(kaylyn)\nnot Orderly(kaylyn)\nPlacid(kaylyn)\nBiaural(kaylyn)\nDarned(kaylyn)\nHempen(jerold)\nDarned(jerold)\nYucky(jerold)\nOrderly(analise)\nDarned(analise)\nPlacid(analise) -> not Orderly(analise)\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Yucky(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) and not Darned(x) -> Yucky(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Darned(x) and Yucky(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) and Orderly(x) -> not Aghast(x))\nAghast(jerold) and not Placid(jerold) -> not Orderly(jerold)\n\nAghast(analise)\n\nOrderly(analise) and forall x (Orderly(x) -> Hempen(x)) -> therefore Hempen(analise) Hempen(analise) and forall x (Hempen(x) -> Aghast(x)) -> therefore Aghast(analise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Friedrick is miry. Friedrick is burmese. Friedrick is brazen. Friedrick is inebriated. Friedrick is dutch. Willard is not miry. Willard is not autoerotic. Willard is burmese. Willard is brazen. Willard is inebriated. Hasheem is miry. Hasheem is inebriated. Hasheem is dutch. Damon is autoerotic. Damon is inebriated. If Damon is burmese then Damon is not autoerotic. All contained people are dutch. If someone is miry and not inebriated then they are dutch. Blue people are miry. Smart, dutch people are contained. If someone is miry then they are contained. If someone is burmese and autoerotic then they are not contained. If Hasheem is contained and Hasheem is not burmese then Hasheem is not autoerotic. Damon is not contained.", "logic": "\nMiry(friedrick)\nBurmese(friedrick)\nBrazen(friedrick)\nInebriated(friedrick)\nDutch(friedrick)\nnot Miry(willard)\nnot Autoerotic(willard)\nBurmese(willard)\nBrazen(willard)\nInebriated(willard)\nMiry(hasheem)\nInebriated(hasheem)\nDutch(hasheem)\nAutoerotic(damon)\nInebriated(damon)\nBurmese(damon) -> not Autoerotic(damon)\nforall x (Contained(x) -> Dutch(x))\nforall x (Miry(x) and not Inebriated(x) -> Dutch(x))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Miry(x))\nforall x (Inebriated(x) and Dutch(x) -> Contained(x))\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Contained(x))\nforall x (Burmese(x) and Autoerotic(x) -> not Contained(x))\nContained(hasheem) and not Burmese(hasheem) -> not Autoerotic(hasheem)\n\nnot Contained(damon)\n\nAutoerotic(damon) and forall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Miry(x)) -> therefore Miry(damon) Miry(damon) and forall x (Miry(x) -> Contained(x)) -> therefore Contained(damon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Mirella is scriptural. Mirella is windup. Mirella is lendable. Mirella is torturing. Mirella is humorous. Lawrence is not scriptural. Lawrence is not seasonable. Lawrence is windup. Lawrence is lendable. Lawrence is torturing. Claus is scriptural. Claus is torturing. Claus is humorous. Opaline is seasonable. Opaline is torturing. If Opaline is windup then Opaline is not seasonable. All pyretic people are humorous. If someone is scriptural and not torturing then they are humorous. Blue people are scriptural. Smart, humorous people are pyretic. If someone is scriptural then they are pyretic. If someone is windup and seasonable then they are not pyretic. If Claus is pyretic and Claus is not windup then Claus is not seasonable. Lawrence is not humorous.", "logic": "\nScriptural(mirella)\nWindup(mirella)\nLendable(mirella)\nTorturing(mirella)\nHumorous(mirella)\nnot Scriptural(lawrence)\nnot Seasonable(lawrence)\nWindup(lawrence)\nLendable(lawrence)\nTorturing(lawrence)\nScriptural(claus)\nTorturing(claus)\nHumorous(claus)\nSeasonable(opaline)\nTorturing(opaline)\nWindup(opaline) -> not Seasonable(opaline)\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Humorous(x))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) and not Torturing(x) -> Humorous(x))\nforall x (Seasonable(x) -> Scriptural(x))\nforall x (Torturing(x) and Humorous(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Windup(x) and Seasonable(x) -> not Pyretic(x))\nPyretic(claus) and not Windup(claus) -> not Seasonable(claus)\n\nnot Humorous(lawrence)\n\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Humorous(x)) <- forall x (Torturing(x) and Humorous(x) -> Pyretic(x)) <- forall x (Scriptural(x) and not Torturing(x) -> Humorous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Paulo is concealing. Paulo is wearing. Paulo is autoimmune. Paulo is xenophobic. Paulo is stupefied. Jimmy is not concealing. Jimmy is not sopranino. Jimmy is wearing. Jimmy is autoimmune. Jimmy is xenophobic. Thekla is concealing. Thekla is xenophobic. Thekla is stupefied. Emory is sopranino. Emory is xenophobic. If Emory is wearing then Emory is not sopranino. All bicornuous people are stupefied. If someone is concealing and not xenophobic then they are stupefied. Blue people are concealing. Smart, stupefied people are bicornuous. If someone is concealing then they are bicornuous. If someone is wearing and sopranino then they are not bicornuous. If Thekla is bicornuous and Thekla is not wearing then Thekla is not sopranino. Jimmy is bicornuous.", "logic": "\nConcealing(paulo)\nWearing(paulo)\nAutoimmune(paulo)\nXenophobic(paulo)\nStupefied(paulo)\nnot Concealing(jimmy)\nnot Sopranino(jimmy)\nWearing(jimmy)\nAutoimmune(jimmy)\nXenophobic(jimmy)\nConcealing(thekla)\nXenophobic(thekla)\nStupefied(thekla)\nSopranino(emory)\nXenophobic(emory)\nWearing(emory) -> not Sopranino(emory)\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) and not Xenophobic(x) -> Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and Stupefied(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) and Sopranino(x) -> not Bicornuous(x))\nBicornuous(thekla) and not Wearing(thekla) -> not Sopranino(thekla)\n\nBicornuous(jimmy)\n\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and Stupefied(x) -> Bicornuous(x)) <- forall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Stupefied(x)) <- forall x (Concealing(x) -> Bicornuous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Neysa is laggard. Neysa is agrarian. Neysa is shoed. Neysa is grievous. Neysa is spacy. Zebulen is not laggard. Zebulen is not norman. Zebulen is agrarian. Zebulen is shoed. Zebulen is grievous. Nanon is laggard. Nanon is grievous. Nanon is spacy. Alyssa is norman. Alyssa is grievous. If Alyssa is agrarian then Alyssa is not norman. All boundless people are spacy. If someone is laggard and not grievous then they are spacy. Blue people are laggard. Smart, spacy people are boundless. If someone is laggard then they are boundless. If someone is agrarian and norman then they are not boundless. If Nanon is boundless and Nanon is not agrarian then Nanon is not norman. Alyssa is not agrarian.", "logic": "\nLaggard(neysa)\nAgrarian(neysa)\nShoed(neysa)\nGrievous(neysa)\nSpacy(neysa)\nnot Laggard(zebulen)\nnot Norman(zebulen)\nAgrarian(zebulen)\nShoed(zebulen)\nGrievous(zebulen)\nLaggard(nanon)\nGrievous(nanon)\nSpacy(nanon)\nNorman(alyssa)\nGrievous(alyssa)\nAgrarian(alyssa) -> not Norman(alyssa)\nforall x (Boundless(x) -> Spacy(x))\nforall x (Laggard(x) and not Grievous(x) -> Spacy(x))\nforall x (Norman(x) -> Laggard(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Spacy(x) -> Boundless(x))\nforall x (Laggard(x) -> Boundless(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) and Norman(x) -> not Boundless(x))\nBoundless(nanon) and not Agrarian(nanon) -> not Norman(nanon)\n\nnot Agrarian(alyssa)\n\nnot Agrarian(alyssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Opal is maledict. Opal is even. Opal is bilobate. Opal is hundredth. Opal is viscous. Ted is not maledict. Ted is not homostylic. Ted is even. Ted is bilobate. Ted is hundredth. Olenka is maledict. Olenka is hundredth. Olenka is viscous. Ingram is homostylic. Ingram is hundredth. If Ingram is even then Ingram is not homostylic. All gutless people are viscous. If someone is maledict and not hundredth then they are viscous. Blue people are maledict. Smart, viscous people are gutless. If someone is maledict then they are gutless. If someone is even and homostylic then they are not gutless. If Olenka is gutless and Olenka is not even then Olenka is not homostylic. Olenka is bilobate.", "logic": "\nMaledict(opal)\nEven(opal)\nBilobate(opal)\nHundredth(opal)\nViscous(opal)\nnot Maledict(ted)\nnot Homostylic(ted)\nEven(ted)\nBilobate(ted)\nHundredth(ted)\nMaledict(olenka)\nHundredth(olenka)\nViscous(olenka)\nHomostylic(ingram)\nHundredth(ingram)\nEven(ingram) -> not Homostylic(ingram)\nforall x (Gutless(x) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Maledict(x) and not Hundredth(x) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Hundredth(x) and Viscous(x) -> Gutless(x))\nforall x (Maledict(x) -> Gutless(x))\nforall x (Even(x) and Homostylic(x) -> not Gutless(x))\nGutless(olenka) and not Even(olenka) -> not Homostylic(olenka)\n\nBilobate(olenka)\n\nBilobate(olenka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Alwin is mere. Alwin is mitigated. Alwin is cheerful. Alwin is warring. Alwin is relentless. Oscar is not mere. Oscar is not sign. Oscar is mitigated. Oscar is cheerful. Oscar is warring. Kris is mere. Kris is warring. Kris is relentless. Ezechiel is sign. Ezechiel is warring. If Ezechiel is mitigated then Ezechiel is not sign. All undefeated people are relentless. If someone is mere and not warring then they are relentless. Blue people are mere. Smart, relentless people are undefeated. If someone is mere then they are undefeated. If someone is mitigated and sign then they are not undefeated. If Kris is undefeated and Kris is not mitigated then Kris is not sign. Kris is not sign.", "logic": "\nMere(alwin)\nMitigated(alwin)\nCheerful(alwin)\nWarring(alwin)\nRelentless(alwin)\nnot Mere(oscar)\nnot Sign(oscar)\nMitigated(oscar)\nCheerful(oscar)\nWarring(oscar)\nMere(kris)\nWarring(kris)\nRelentless(kris)\nSign(ezechiel)\nWarring(ezechiel)\nMitigated(ezechiel) -> not Sign(ezechiel)\nforall x (Undefeated(x) -> Relentless(x))\nforall x (Mere(x) and not Warring(x) -> Relentless(x))\nforall x (Sign(x) -> Mere(x))\nforall x (Warring(x) and Relentless(x) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) and Sign(x) -> not Undefeated(x))\nUndefeated(kris) and not Mitigated(kris) -> not Sign(kris)\n\nnot Sign(kris)\n\nnot Sign(kris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Kimberlyn is jiggered. Kimberlyn is cernuous. Kimberlyn is similar. Kimberlyn is indonesian. Kimberlyn is automotive. Ivett is not jiggered. Ivett is not apposable. Ivett is cernuous. Ivett is similar. Ivett is indonesian. Mendel is jiggered. Mendel is indonesian. Mendel is automotive. Lucinda is apposable. Lucinda is indonesian. If Lucinda is cernuous then Lucinda is not apposable. All snappy people are automotive. If someone is jiggered and not indonesian then they are automotive. Blue people are jiggered. Smart, automotive people are snappy. If someone is jiggered then they are snappy. If someone is cernuous and apposable then they are not snappy. If Mendel is snappy and Mendel is not cernuous then Mendel is not apposable. Mendel is cernuous.", "logic": "\nJiggered(kimberlyn)\nCernuous(kimberlyn)\nSimilar(kimberlyn)\nIndonesian(kimberlyn)\nAutomotive(kimberlyn)\nnot Jiggered(ivett)\nnot Apposable(ivett)\nCernuous(ivett)\nSimilar(ivett)\nIndonesian(ivett)\nJiggered(mendel)\nIndonesian(mendel)\nAutomotive(mendel)\nApposable(lucinda)\nIndonesian(lucinda)\nCernuous(lucinda) -> not Apposable(lucinda)\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> Automotive(x))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) and not Indonesian(x) -> Automotive(x))\nforall x (Apposable(x) -> Jiggered(x))\nforall x (Indonesian(x) and Automotive(x) -> Snappy(x))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) -> Snappy(x))\nforall x (Cernuous(x) and Apposable(x) -> not Snappy(x))\nSnappy(mendel) and not Cernuous(mendel) -> not Apposable(mendel)\n\nCernuous(mendel)\n\nCernuous(mendel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Berty is clastic. Berty is loopy. Berty is silvan. Cornelius is clastic. Cornelius is quechuan. Cornelius is west. Cornelius is unceasing. Cornelius is silvan. Dulcea is clastic. Dulcea is quechuan. Dulcea is west. Dulcea is loopy. Cold, clastic things are unceasing. If something is unceasing and west then it is silvan. Berty is clastic.", "logic": "\nClastic(berty)\nLoopy(berty)\nSilvan(berty)\nClastic(cornelius)\nQuechuan(cornelius)\nWest(cornelius)\nUnceasing(cornelius)\nSilvan(cornelius)\nClastic(dulcea)\nQuechuan(dulcea)\nWest(dulcea)\nLoopy(dulcea)\nforall x (Quechuan(x) and Clastic(x) -> Unceasing(x))\nforall x (Unceasing(x) and West(x) -> Silvan(x))\n\nClastic(berty)\n\ntherefore Clastic(berty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Ailyn is skillful. Ailyn is biomedical. Ailyn is peopled. Kaitlynn is skillful. Kaitlynn is bermudan. Kaitlynn is glorious. Kaitlynn is episcopal. Kaitlynn is peopled. Merlina is skillful. Merlina is bermudan. Merlina is glorious. Merlina is biomedical. Cold, skillful things are episcopal. If something is episcopal and glorious then it is peopled. Kaitlynn is not episcopal.", "logic": "\nSkillful(ailyn)\nBiomedical(ailyn)\nPeopled(ailyn)\nSkillful(kaitlynn)\nBermudan(kaitlynn)\nGlorious(kaitlynn)\nEpiscopal(kaitlynn)\nPeopled(kaitlynn)\nSkillful(merlina)\nBermudan(merlina)\nGlorious(merlina)\nBiomedical(merlina)\nforall x (Bermudan(x) and Skillful(x) -> Episcopal(x))\nforall x (Episcopal(x) and Glorious(x) -> Peopled(x))\n\nnot Episcopal(kaitlynn)\n\ntherefore Episcopal(kaitlynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Tremayne is acquired. Tremayne is meshugge. Tremayne is peruked. Tye is acquired. Tye is touristy. Tye is unintended. Tye is afghan. Tye is peruked. Nicky is acquired. Nicky is touristy. Nicky is unintended. Nicky is meshugge. Cold, acquired things are afghan. If something is afghan and unintended then it is peruked. Nicky is afghan.", "logic": "\nAcquired(tremayne)\nMeshugge(tremayne)\nPeruked(tremayne)\nAcquired(tye)\nTouristy(tye)\nUnintended(tye)\nAfghan(tye)\nPeruked(tye)\nAcquired(nicky)\nTouristy(nicky)\nUnintended(nicky)\nMeshugge(nicky)\nforall x (Touristy(x) and Acquired(x) -> Afghan(x))\nforall x (Afghan(x) and Unintended(x) -> Peruked(x))\n\nAfghan(nicky)\n\nTouristy(nicky) and Acquired(nicky) and forall x (Touristy(x) and Acquired(x) -> Afghan(x)) -> therefore Afghan(nicky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Dorey is cheliceral. Dorey is unvigilant. Dorey is porous. Daloris is cheliceral. Daloris is spangled. Daloris is shirty. Daloris is untapped. Daloris is porous. Selina is cheliceral. Selina is spangled. Selina is shirty. Selina is unvigilant. Cold, cheliceral things are untapped. If something is untapped and shirty then it is porous. Selina is not untapped.", "logic": "\nCheliceral(dorey)\nUnvigilant(dorey)\nPorous(dorey)\nCheliceral(daloris)\nSpangled(daloris)\nShirty(daloris)\nUntapped(daloris)\nPorous(daloris)\nCheliceral(selina)\nSpangled(selina)\nShirty(selina)\nUnvigilant(selina)\nforall x (Spangled(x) and Cheliceral(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) and Shirty(x) -> Porous(x))\n\nnot Untapped(selina)\n\nSpangled(selina) and Cheliceral(selina) and forall x (Spangled(x) and Cheliceral(x) -> Untapped(x)) -> therefore Untapped(selina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Luna is blustering. Luna is parrotlike. Luna is offhanded. Cate is blustering. Cate is invitatory. Cate is handy. Cate is broadleaf. Cate is offhanded. Darcey is blustering. Darcey is invitatory. Darcey is handy. Darcey is parrotlike. Cold, blustering things are broadleaf. If something is broadleaf and handy then it is offhanded. Darcey is offhanded.", "logic": "\nBlustering(luna)\nParrotlike(luna)\nOffhanded(luna)\nBlustering(cate)\nInvitatory(cate)\nHandy(cate)\nBroadleaf(cate)\nOffhanded(cate)\nBlustering(darcey)\nInvitatory(darcey)\nHandy(darcey)\nParrotlike(darcey)\nforall x (Invitatory(x) and Blustering(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\nforall x (Broadleaf(x) and Handy(x) -> Offhanded(x))\n\nOffhanded(darcey)\n\nInvitatory(darcey) and Blustering(darcey) and forall x (Invitatory(x) and Blustering(x) -> Broadleaf(x)) -> therefore Broadleaf(darcey) Broadleaf(darcey) and Handy(darcey) and forall x (Broadleaf(x) and Handy(x) -> Offhanded(x)) -> therefore Offhanded(darcey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Kaitlynn is bolshevik. Kaitlynn is visualized. Kaitlynn is backward. Murial is bolshevik. Murial is deathly. Murial is sanative. Murial is organised. Murial is backward. Jacinthe is bolshevik. Jacinthe is deathly. Jacinthe is sanative. Jacinthe is visualized. Cold, bolshevik things are organised. If something is organised and sanative then it is backward. Jacinthe is not backward.", "logic": "\nBolshevik(kaitlynn)\nVisualized(kaitlynn)\nBackward(kaitlynn)\nBolshevik(murial)\nDeathly(murial)\nSanative(murial)\nOrganised(murial)\nBackward(murial)\nBolshevik(jacinthe)\nDeathly(jacinthe)\nSanative(jacinthe)\nVisualized(jacinthe)\nforall x (Deathly(x) and Bolshevik(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) and Sanative(x) -> Backward(x))\n\nnot Backward(jacinthe)\n\nDeathly(jacinthe) and Bolshevik(jacinthe) and forall x (Deathly(x) and Bolshevik(x) -> Organised(x)) -> therefore Organised(jacinthe) Organised(jacinthe) and Sanative(jacinthe) and forall x (Organised(x) and Sanative(x) -> Backward(x)) -> therefore Backward(jacinthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Gusti is renewed. Gusti is vulval. Gusti is obtrusive. Sturgis is renewed. Sturgis is motionless. Sturgis is scowling. Sturgis is coccoid. Sturgis is obtrusive. Carli is renewed. Carli is motionless. Carli is scowling. Carli is vulval. Cold, renewed things are coccoid. If something is coccoid and scowling then it is obtrusive. Gusti is not coccoid.", "logic": "\nRenewed(gusti)\nVulval(gusti)\nObtrusive(gusti)\nRenewed(sturgis)\nMotionless(sturgis)\nScowling(sturgis)\nCoccoid(sturgis)\nObtrusive(sturgis)\nRenewed(carli)\nMotionless(carli)\nScowling(carli)\nVulval(carli)\nforall x (Motionless(x) and Renewed(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nforall x (Coccoid(x) and Scowling(x) -> Obtrusive(x))\n\nnot Coccoid(gusti)\n\nforall x (Motionless(x) and Renewed(x) -> Coccoid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Liane is bacterial. Liane is deadlocked. Liane is alcoholic. Philomena is bacterial. Philomena is cardboard. Philomena is zymoid. Philomena is actionable. Philomena is alcoholic. Claudius is bacterial. Claudius is cardboard. Claudius is zymoid. Claudius is deadlocked. Cold, bacterial things are actionable. If something is actionable and zymoid then it is alcoholic. Philomena is deadlocked.", "logic": "\nBacterial(liane)\nDeadlocked(liane)\nAlcoholic(liane)\nBacterial(philomena)\nCardboard(philomena)\nZymoid(philomena)\nActionable(philomena)\nAlcoholic(philomena)\nBacterial(claudius)\nCardboard(claudius)\nZymoid(claudius)\nDeadlocked(claudius)\nforall x (Cardboard(x) and Bacterial(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Actionable(x) and Zymoid(x) -> Alcoholic(x))\n\nDeadlocked(philomena)\n\nDeadlocked(philomena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Thatcher is overhand. Thatcher is incendiary. Thatcher is allopathic. Robinette is overhand. Robinette is serene. Robinette is psychic. Robinette is genealogic. Robinette is allopathic. Bridgett is overhand. Bridgett is serene. Bridgett is psychic. Bridgett is incendiary. Cold, overhand things are genealogic. If something is genealogic and psychic then it is allopathic. Thatcher is not psychic.", "logic": "\nOverhand(thatcher)\nIncendiary(thatcher)\nAllopathic(thatcher)\nOverhand(robinette)\nSerene(robinette)\nPsychic(robinette)\nGenealogic(robinette)\nAllopathic(robinette)\nOverhand(bridgett)\nSerene(bridgett)\nPsychic(bridgett)\nIncendiary(bridgett)\nforall x (Serene(x) and Overhand(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nforall x (Genealogic(x) and Psychic(x) -> Allopathic(x))\n\nnot Psychic(thatcher)\n\nnot Psychic(thatcher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Sherie is plausible. Sherie is unsoluble. Sherie is choral. Claudine is plausible. Claudine is miniature. Claudine is zimbabwean. Claudine is synoptic. Claudine is choral. Cilka is plausible. Cilka is miniature. Cilka is zimbabwean. Cilka is unsoluble. Cold, plausible things are synoptic. If something is synoptic and zimbabwean then it is choral. Cilka is green.", "logic": "\nPlausible(sherie)\nUnsoluble(sherie)\nChoral(sherie)\nPlausible(claudine)\nMiniature(claudine)\nZimbabwean(claudine)\nSynoptic(claudine)\nChoral(claudine)\nPlausible(cilka)\nMiniature(cilka)\nZimbabwean(cilka)\nUnsoluble(cilka)\nforall x (Miniature(x) and Plausible(x) -> Synoptic(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and Zimbabwean(x) -> Choral(x))\n\nGreen(cilka)\n\nGreen(cilka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Lizette is awheel. Lizette is dicky. Lizette is stylish. Selia is awheel. Selia is permed. Selia is uncrossed. Selia is shocked. Selia is stylish. Delphina is awheel. Delphina is permed. Delphina is uncrossed. Delphina is dicky. Cold, awheel things are shocked. If something is shocked and uncrossed then it is stylish. Selia is not green.", "logic": "\nAwheel(lizette)\nDicky(lizette)\nStylish(lizette)\nAwheel(selia)\nPermed(selia)\nUncrossed(selia)\nShocked(selia)\nStylish(selia)\nAwheel(delphina)\nPermed(delphina)\nUncrossed(delphina)\nDicky(delphina)\nforall x (Permed(x) and Awheel(x) -> Shocked(x))\nforall x (Shocked(x) and Uncrossed(x) -> Stylish(x))\n\nnot Green(selia)\n\nnot Green(selia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "Sashenka is sweetheart. Sashenka is thermionic. Sashenka is submersed. Kaiser is sweetheart. Kaiser is botulinal. Kaiser is crosswise. Kaiser is masterly. Kaiser is submersed. Antonetta is sweetheart. Antonetta is botulinal. Antonetta is crosswise. Antonetta is thermionic. Cold, sweetheart things are masterly. If something is masterly and crosswise then it is submersed. Sashenka is botulinal.", "logic": "\nSweetheart(sashenka)\nThermionic(sashenka)\nSubmersed(sashenka)\nSweetheart(kaiser)\nBotulinal(kaiser)\nCrosswise(kaiser)\nMasterly(kaiser)\nSubmersed(kaiser)\nSweetheart(antonetta)\nBotulinal(antonetta)\nCrosswise(antonetta)\nThermionic(antonetta)\nforall x (Botulinal(x) and Sweetheart(x) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Masterly(x) and Crosswise(x) -> Submersed(x))\n\nBotulinal(sashenka)\n\nBotulinal(sashenka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1874"} {"premises": "The hasheem is curtained. The hasheem is chaetal. The hasheem is spatial. Nice, curtained things are stubby. All stubby things are operculate. The hasheem is curtained.", "logic": "\nCurtained(hasheem)\nChaetal(hasheem)\nSpatial(hasheem)\nforall x (Spatial(x) and Curtained(x) -> Stubby(x))\nforall x (Stubby(x) -> Operculate(x))\n\nCurtained(hasheem)\n\ntherefore Curtained(hasheem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "The marcela is archaistic. The marcela is walking. The marcela is throaty. Nice, archaistic things are iridic. All iridic things are aspheric. The marcela is not throaty.", "logic": "\nArchaistic(marcela)\nWalking(marcela)\nThroaty(marcela)\nforall x (Throaty(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Iridic(x))\nforall x (Iridic(x) -> Aspheric(x))\n\nnot Throaty(marcela)\n\ntherefore Throaty(marcela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "The valerye is unfocused. The valerye is atrial. The valerye is unaware. Nice, unfocused things are dimorphic. All dimorphic things are frosted. The valerye is dimorphic.", "logic": "\nUnfocused(valerye)\nAtrial(valerye)\nUnaware(valerye)\nforall x (Unaware(x) and Unfocused(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) -> Frosted(x))\n\nDimorphic(valerye)\n\nUnaware(valerye) and Unfocused(valerye) and forall x (Unaware(x) and Unfocused(x) -> Dimorphic(x)) -> therefore Dimorphic(valerye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "The olenka is leal. The olenka is specific. The olenka is underhung. Nice, leal things are nett. All nett things are unrentable. The olenka is not nett.", "logic": "\nLeal(olenka)\nSpecific(olenka)\nUnderhung(olenka)\nforall x (Underhung(x) and Leal(x) -> Nett(x))\nforall x (Nett(x) -> Unrentable(x))\n\nnot Nett(olenka)\n\nUnderhung(olenka) and Leal(olenka) and forall x (Underhung(x) and Leal(x) -> Nett(x)) -> therefore Nett(olenka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "The jacky is doubtful. The jacky is rachitic. The jacky is languorous. Nice, doubtful things are bulblike. All bulblike things are erogenous. The jacky is erogenous.", "logic": "\nDoubtful(jacky)\nRachitic(jacky)\nLanguorous(jacky)\nforall x (Languorous(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Bulblike(x))\nforall x (Bulblike(x) -> Erogenous(x))\n\nErogenous(jacky)\n\nLanguorous(jacky) and Doubtful(jacky) and forall x (Languorous(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Bulblike(x)) -> therefore Bulblike(jacky) Bulblike(jacky) and forall x (Bulblike(x) -> Erogenous(x)) -> therefore Erogenous(jacky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "The elna is smothering. The elna is bellicose. The elna is datable. Nice, smothering things are bengali. All bengali things are carbonated. The elna is not carbonated.", "logic": "\nSmothering(elna)\nBellicose(elna)\nDatable(elna)\nforall x (Datable(x) and Smothering(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) -> Carbonated(x))\n\nnot Carbonated(elna)\n\nDatable(elna) and Smothering(elna) and forall x (Datable(x) and Smothering(x) -> Bengali(x)) -> therefore Bengali(elna) Bengali(elna) and forall x (Bengali(x) -> Carbonated(x)) -> therefore Carbonated(elna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "The jemmie is military. The jemmie is incitive. The jemmie is corned. Nice, military things are motherly. All motherly things are fusible. The jemmie does not visit the jemmie.", "logic": "\nMilitary(jemmie)\nIncitive(jemmie)\nCorned(jemmie)\nforall x (Corned(x) and Military(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) -> Fusible(x))\n\nnot Visits(jemmie, jemmie)\n\nnot Visits(jemmie, jemmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "The lisabeth is tangible. The lisabeth is shadowed. The lisabeth is pyknotic. Nice, tangible things are superhuman. All superhuman things are vulpecular. The lisabeth eats the lisabeth.", "logic": "\nTangible(lisabeth)\nShadowed(lisabeth)\nPyknotic(lisabeth)\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) and Tangible(x) -> Superhuman(x))\nforall x (Superhuman(x) -> Vulpecular(x))\n\nEats(lisabeth, lisabeth)\n\nEats(lisabeth, lisabeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-742"} {"premises": "Carma is dependant. Carma is milled. Isabeau is calcific. Isabeau is milled. Isabeau is not feverish. Isabeau is lossy. Isabeau is zesty. Patty is aweigh. Patty is lossy. Patty is zesty. All calcific, milled people are aweigh. Red people are calcific. Patty is aweigh.", "logic": "\nDependant(carma)\nMilled(carma)\nCalcific(isabeau)\nMilled(isabeau)\nnot Feverish(isabeau)\nLossy(isabeau)\nZesty(isabeau)\nAweigh(patty)\nLossy(patty)\nZesty(patty)\nforall x (Calcific(x) and Milled(x) -> Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Calcific(x))\n\nAweigh(patty)\n\ntherefore Aweigh(patty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Kelcey is sixtieth. Kelcey is pelvic. Jennifer is sadducean. Jennifer is pelvic. Jennifer is not amphibian. Jennifer is marxist. Jennifer is carroty. Editha is rotatory. Editha is marxist. Editha is carroty. All sadducean, pelvic people are rotatory. Red people are sadducean. Editha is not carroty.", "logic": "\nSixtieth(kelcey)\nPelvic(kelcey)\nSadducean(jennifer)\nPelvic(jennifer)\nnot Amphibian(jennifer)\nMarxist(jennifer)\nCarroty(jennifer)\nRotatory(editha)\nMarxist(editha)\nCarroty(editha)\nforall x (Sadducean(x) and Pelvic(x) -> Rotatory(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) -> Sadducean(x))\n\nnot Carroty(editha)\n\ntherefore Carroty(editha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Agamemnon is libertine. Agamemnon is arboreous. Lilas is nullified. Lilas is arboreous. Lilas is not daunted. Lilas is depraved. Lilas is hermitical. Luther is angelic. Luther is depraved. Luther is hermitical. All nullified, arboreous people are angelic. Red people are nullified. Lilas is angelic.", "logic": "\nLibertine(agamemnon)\nArboreous(agamemnon)\nNullified(lilas)\nArboreous(lilas)\nnot Daunted(lilas)\nDepraved(lilas)\nHermitical(lilas)\nAngelic(luther)\nDepraved(luther)\nHermitical(luther)\nforall x (Nullified(x) and Arboreous(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Arboreous(x) -> Nullified(x))\n\nAngelic(lilas)\n\nNullified(lilas) and Arboreous(lilas) and forall x (Nullified(x) and Arboreous(x) -> Angelic(x)) -> therefore Angelic(lilas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Nicolle is budding. Nicolle is empurpled. Yale is notable. Yale is empurpled. Yale is not sensorial. Yale is classified. Yale is loving. Beatrix is willful. Beatrix is classified. Beatrix is loving. All notable, empurpled people are willful. Red people are notable. Yale is not willful.", "logic": "\nBudding(nicolle)\nEmpurpled(nicolle)\nNotable(yale)\nEmpurpled(yale)\nnot Sensorial(yale)\nClassified(yale)\nLoving(yale)\nWillful(beatrix)\nClassified(beatrix)\nLoving(beatrix)\nforall x (Notable(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Willful(x))\nforall x (Empurpled(x) -> Notable(x))\n\nnot Willful(yale)\n\nNotable(yale) and Empurpled(yale) and forall x (Notable(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Willful(x)) -> therefore Willful(yale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Lucille is picayune. Lucille is verbatim. Gayleen is disgusting. Gayleen is verbatim. Gayleen is not tensile. Gayleen is immanent. Gayleen is satisfied. Lloyd is zoophagous. Lloyd is immanent. Lloyd is satisfied. All disgusting, verbatim people are zoophagous. Red people are disgusting. Lucille is zoophagous.", "logic": "\nPicayune(lucille)\nVerbatim(lucille)\nDisgusting(gayleen)\nVerbatim(gayleen)\nnot Tensile(gayleen)\nImmanent(gayleen)\nSatisfied(gayleen)\nZoophagous(lloyd)\nImmanent(lloyd)\nSatisfied(lloyd)\nforall x (Disgusting(x) and Verbatim(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\nforall x (Verbatim(x) -> Disgusting(x))\n\nZoophagous(lucille)\n\nVerbatim(lucille) and forall x (Verbatim(x) -> Disgusting(x)) -> therefore Disgusting(lucille) Disgusting(lucille) and Verbatim(lucille) and forall x (Disgusting(x) and Verbatim(x) -> Zoophagous(x)) -> therefore Zoophagous(lucille)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Windham is acervate. Windham is insouciant. Timmi is motored. Timmi is insouciant. Timmi is not venal. Timmi is offensive. Timmi is gummy. Thurstan is sympatric. Thurstan is offensive. Thurstan is gummy. All motored, insouciant people are sympatric. Red people are motored. Windham is not sympatric.", "logic": "\nAcervate(windham)\nInsouciant(windham)\nMotored(timmi)\nInsouciant(timmi)\nnot Venal(timmi)\nOffensive(timmi)\nGummy(timmi)\nSympatric(thurstan)\nOffensive(thurstan)\nGummy(thurstan)\nforall x (Motored(x) and Insouciant(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) -> Motored(x))\n\nnot Sympatric(windham)\n\nInsouciant(windham) and forall x (Insouciant(x) -> Motored(x)) -> therefore Motored(windham) Motored(windham) and Insouciant(windham) and forall x (Motored(x) and Insouciant(x) -> Sympatric(x)) -> therefore Sympatric(windham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Karylin is tasseled. Karylin is humpbacked. Grata is classless. Grata is humpbacked. Grata is not oversized. Grata is translunar. Grata is nominal. Natka is mellowed. Natka is translunar. Natka is nominal. All classless, humpbacked people are mellowed. Red people are classless. Natka is not classless.", "logic": "\nTasseled(karylin)\nHumpbacked(karylin)\nClassless(grata)\nHumpbacked(grata)\nnot Oversized(grata)\nTranslunar(grata)\nNominal(grata)\nMellowed(natka)\nTranslunar(natka)\nNominal(natka)\nforall x (Classless(x) and Humpbacked(x) -> Mellowed(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Classless(x))\n\nnot Classless(natka)\n\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Classless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Ofilia is loopy. Ofilia is inoperable. Shandra is panoplied. Shandra is inoperable. Shandra is not cataphatic. Shandra is monodical. Shandra is slipshod. Reese is vestmental. Reese is monodical. Reese is slipshod. All panoplied, inoperable people are vestmental. Red people are panoplied. Reese is cataphatic.", "logic": "\nLoopy(ofilia)\nInoperable(ofilia)\nPanoplied(shandra)\nInoperable(shandra)\nnot Cataphatic(shandra)\nMonodical(shandra)\nSlipshod(shandra)\nVestmental(reese)\nMonodical(reese)\nSlipshod(reese)\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and Inoperable(x) -> Vestmental(x))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) -> Panoplied(x))\n\nCataphatic(reese)\n\nCataphatic(reese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Merill is scattered. Merill is unlipped. Roderich is ferric. Roderich is unlipped. Roderich is not clotted. Roderich is flaunty. Roderich is runproof. Diahann is winsome. Diahann is flaunty. Diahann is runproof. All ferric, unlipped people are winsome. Red people are ferric. Diahann is not scattered.", "logic": "\nScattered(merill)\nUnlipped(merill)\nFerric(roderich)\nUnlipped(roderich)\nnot Clotted(roderich)\nFlaunty(roderich)\nRunproof(roderich)\nWinsome(diahann)\nFlaunty(diahann)\nRunproof(diahann)\nforall x (Ferric(x) and Unlipped(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Unlipped(x) -> Ferric(x))\n\nnot Scattered(diahann)\n\nnot Scattered(diahann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Damien is hunted. Damien is huffish. Grady is allelic. Grady is huffish. Grady is not backstairs. Grady is birken. Grady is execrable. Yard is raising. Yard is birken. Yard is execrable. All allelic, huffish people are raising. Red people are allelic. Damien is execrable.", "logic": "\nHunted(damien)\nHuffish(damien)\nAllelic(grady)\nHuffish(grady)\nnot Backstairs(grady)\nBirken(grady)\nExecrable(grady)\nRaising(yard)\nBirken(yard)\nExecrable(yard)\nforall x (Allelic(x) and Huffish(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Huffish(x) -> Allelic(x))\n\nExecrable(damien)\n\nExecrable(damien) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Verile is jewelled. Verile is dissident. Damara is brachiopod. Damara is dissident. Damara is not through. Damara is azygos. Damara is proscribed. Ryann is paperlike. Ryann is azygos. Ryann is proscribed. All brachiopod, dissident people are paperlike. Red people are brachiopod. Damara is not jewelled.", "logic": "\nJewelled(verile)\nDissident(verile)\nBrachiopod(damara)\nDissident(damara)\nnot Through(damara)\nAzygos(damara)\nProscribed(damara)\nPaperlike(ryann)\nAzygos(ryann)\nProscribed(ryann)\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) and Dissident(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Dissident(x) -> Brachiopod(x))\n\nnot Jewelled(damara)\n\nnot Jewelled(damara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "Josi is cotyloidal. Josi is reborn. Brunhilde is carved. Brunhilde is reborn. Brunhilde is not polynomial. Brunhilde is shingly. Brunhilde is motorized. Sandy is publicised. Sandy is shingly. Sandy is motorized. All carved, reborn people are publicised. Red people are carved. Sandy is reborn.", "logic": "\nCotyloidal(josi)\nReborn(josi)\nCarved(brunhilde)\nReborn(brunhilde)\nnot Polynomial(brunhilde)\nShingly(brunhilde)\nMotorized(brunhilde)\nPublicised(sandy)\nShingly(sandy)\nMotorized(sandy)\nforall x (Carved(x) and Reborn(x) -> Publicised(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) -> Carved(x))\n\nReborn(sandy)\n\nReborn(sandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-51"} {"premises": "The michelina is unwrinkled. The zilvia is papery. The sibilla does not see the michelina. If someone tenure the michelina then they are wizardly. If someone is unwrinkled then they need the michelina. Nice people are unwrinkled. If the michelina is greyish then the michelina upload the zilvia. If someone spool the sibilla then the sibilla spool the michelina. If someone spool the michelina and the michelina tenure the zilvia then the michelina does not see the sibilla. The sibilla does not see the michelina.", "logic": "\nUnwrinkled(michelina)\nPapery(zilvia)\nnot Tenure(sibilla, michelina)\nforall x (Tenure(x, michelina) -> Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Spool(x, michelina))\nforall x (Papery(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nGreyish(michelina) -> Upload(michelina, zilvia)\nforall x (Spool(x, sibilla) -> Spool(sibilla, michelina))\nforall x (Spool(x, michelina) and Tenure(michelina, zilvia) -> not Tenure(michelina, sibilla))\n\nnot Tenure(sibilla, michelina)\n\ntherefore not Tenure(sibilla, michelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The orazio is uppity. The tiphany is carbonylic. The bridgette does not see the orazio. If someone side the orazio then they are nonmusical. If someone is uppity then they need the orazio. Nice people are uppity. If the orazio is overbold then the orazio compile the tiphany. If someone fold the bridgette then the bridgette fold the orazio. If someone fold the orazio and the orazio side the tiphany then the orazio does not see the bridgette. The tiphany is not carbonylic.", "logic": "\nUppity(orazio)\nCarbonylic(tiphany)\nnot Side(bridgette, orazio)\nforall x (Side(x, orazio) -> Nonmusical(x))\nforall x (Uppity(x) -> Fold(x, orazio))\nforall x (Carbonylic(x) -> Uppity(x))\nOverbold(orazio) -> Compile(orazio, tiphany)\nforall x (Fold(x, bridgette) -> Fold(bridgette, orazio))\nforall x (Fold(x, orazio) and Side(orazio, tiphany) -> not Side(orazio, bridgette))\n\nnot Carbonylic(tiphany)\n\ntherefore Carbonylic(tiphany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The fawne is undreamt. The jolynn is ambient. The dorine does not see the fawne. If someone liken the fawne then they are barometric. If someone is undreamt then they need the fawne. Nice people are undreamt. If the fawne is biaxal then the fawne declare the jolynn. If someone allot the dorine then the dorine allot the fawne. If someone allot the fawne and the fawne liken the jolynn then the fawne does not see the dorine. The fawne allot the fawne.", "logic": "\nUndreamt(fawne)\nAmbient(jolynn)\nnot Liken(dorine, fawne)\nforall x (Liken(x, fawne) -> Barometric(x))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Allot(x, fawne))\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> Undreamt(x))\nBiaxal(fawne) -> Declare(fawne, jolynn)\nforall x (Allot(x, dorine) -> Allot(dorine, fawne))\nforall x (Allot(x, fawne) and Liken(fawne, jolynn) -> not Liken(fawne, dorine))\n\nAllot(fawne, fawne)\n\nUndreamt(fawne) and forall x (Undreamt(x) -> Allot(x, fawne)) -> therefore Allot(fawne, fawne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The amie is cubital. The queenie is saliferous. The celisse does not see the amie. If someone sailplane the amie then they are herbal. If someone is cubital then they need the amie. Nice people are cubital. If the amie is demanding then the amie hole the queenie. If someone debar the celisse then the celisse debar the amie. If someone debar the amie and the amie sailplane the queenie then the amie does not see the celisse. The queenie is not cubital.", "logic": "\nCubital(amie)\nSaliferous(queenie)\nnot Sailplane(celisse, amie)\nforall x (Sailplane(x, amie) -> Herbal(x))\nforall x (Cubital(x) -> Debar(x, amie))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) -> Cubital(x))\nDemanding(amie) -> Hole(amie, queenie)\nforall x (Debar(x, celisse) -> Debar(celisse, amie))\nforall x (Debar(x, amie) and Sailplane(amie, queenie) -> not Sailplane(amie, celisse))\n\nnot Cubital(queenie)\n\nSaliferous(queenie) and forall x (Saliferous(x) -> Cubital(x)) -> therefore Cubital(queenie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The edna is dominant. The lorelei is walking. The matthiew does not see the edna. If someone skipper the edna then they are dismaying. If someone is dominant then they need the edna. Nice people are dominant. If the edna is faineant then the edna concuss the lorelei. If someone bilk the matthiew then the matthiew bilk the edna. If someone bilk the edna and the edna skipper the lorelei then the edna does not see the matthiew. The lorelei bilk the edna.", "logic": "\nDominant(edna)\nWalking(lorelei)\nnot Skipper(matthiew, edna)\nforall x (Skipper(x, edna) -> Dismaying(x))\nforall x (Dominant(x) -> Bilk(x, edna))\nforall x (Walking(x) -> Dominant(x))\nFaineant(edna) -> Concuss(edna, lorelei)\nforall x (Bilk(x, matthiew) -> Bilk(matthiew, edna))\nforall x (Bilk(x, edna) and Skipper(edna, lorelei) -> not Skipper(edna, matthiew))\n\nBilk(lorelei, edna)\n\nWalking(lorelei) and forall x (Walking(x) -> Dominant(x)) -> therefore Dominant(lorelei) Dominant(lorelei) and forall x (Dominant(x) -> Bilk(x, edna)) -> therefore Bilk(lorelei, edna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The geo is diminuendo. The keriann is mesodermal. The cyril does not see the geo. If someone grapple the geo then they are neapolitan. If someone is diminuendo then they need the geo. Nice people are diminuendo. If the geo is glomerular then the geo catch the keriann. If someone depute the cyril then the cyril depute the geo. If someone depute the geo and the geo grapple the keriann then the geo does not see the cyril. The keriann does not need the geo.", "logic": "\nDiminuendo(geo)\nMesodermal(keriann)\nnot Grapple(cyril, geo)\nforall x (Grapple(x, geo) -> Neapolitan(x))\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Depute(x, geo))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Diminuendo(x))\nGlomerular(geo) -> Catch(geo, keriann)\nforall x (Depute(x, cyril) -> Depute(cyril, geo))\nforall x (Depute(x, geo) and Grapple(geo, keriann) -> not Grapple(geo, cyril))\n\nnot Depute(keriann, geo)\n\nMesodermal(keriann) and forall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Diminuendo(x)) -> therefore Diminuendo(keriann) Diminuendo(keriann) and forall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Depute(x, geo)) -> therefore Depute(keriann, geo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The gen is osmotic. The karalynn is ransomed. The godart does not see the gen. If someone drag the gen then they are moblike. If someone is osmotic then they need the gen. Nice people are osmotic. If the gen is weaponless then the gen curtsey the karalynn. If someone endorse the godart then the godart endorse the gen. If someone endorse the gen and the gen drag the karalynn then the gen does not see the godart. The godart is not moblike.", "logic": "\nOsmotic(gen)\nRansomed(karalynn)\nnot Drag(godart, gen)\nforall x (Drag(x, gen) -> Moblike(x))\nforall x (Osmotic(x) -> Endorse(x, gen))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nWeaponless(gen) -> Curtsey(gen, karalynn)\nforall x (Endorse(x, godart) -> Endorse(godart, gen))\nforall x (Endorse(x, gen) and Drag(gen, karalynn) -> not Drag(gen, godart))\n\nnot Moblike(godart)\n\nforall x (Drag(x, gen) -> Moblike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The robinette is spiffy. The melisa is junoesque. The tasha does not see the robinette. If someone metrify the robinette then they are aperient. If someone is spiffy then they need the robinette. Nice people are spiffy. If the robinette is uninitiate then the robinette disconcert the melisa. If someone fume the tasha then the tasha fume the robinette. If someone fume the robinette and the robinette metrify the melisa then the robinette does not see the tasha. The tasha fume the robinette.", "logic": "\nSpiffy(robinette)\nJunoesque(melisa)\nnot Metrify(tasha, robinette)\nforall x (Metrify(x, robinette) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Spiffy(x) -> Fume(x, robinette))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Spiffy(x))\nUninitiate(robinette) -> Disconcert(robinette, melisa)\nforall x (Fume(x, tasha) -> Fume(tasha, robinette))\nforall x (Fume(x, robinette) and Metrify(robinette, melisa) -> not Metrify(robinette, tasha))\n\nFume(tasha, robinette)\n\nforall x (Spiffy(x) -> Fume(x, robinette)) <- forall x (Junoesque(x) -> Spiffy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The gerty is ferial. The daune is cyprinid. The bev does not see the gerty. If someone coddle the gerty then they are insoluble. If someone is ferial then they need the gerty. Nice people are ferial. If the gerty is squashed then the gerty cram the daune. If someone note the bev then the bev note the gerty. If someone note the gerty and the gerty coddle the daune then the gerty does not see the bev. The gerty does not chase the daune.", "logic": "\nFerial(gerty)\nCyprinid(daune)\nnot Coddle(bev, gerty)\nforall x (Coddle(x, gerty) -> Insoluble(x))\nforall x (Ferial(x) -> Note(x, gerty))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) -> Ferial(x))\nSquashed(gerty) -> Cram(gerty, daune)\nforall x (Note(x, bev) -> Note(bev, gerty))\nforall x (Note(x, gerty) and Coddle(gerty, daune) -> not Coddle(gerty, bev))\n\nnot Cram(gerty, daune)\n\nSquashed(gerty) -> Cram(gerty, daune) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The milissent is proof. The garold is immune. The cher does not see the milissent. If someone mismatch the milissent then they are odious. If someone is proof then they need the milissent. Nice people are proof. If the milissent is luckless then the milissent blob the garold. If someone retransmit the cher then the cher retransmit the milissent. If someone retransmit the milissent and the milissent mismatch the garold then the milissent does not see the cher. The garold blob the milissent.", "logic": "\nProof(milissent)\nImmune(garold)\nnot Mismatch(cher, milissent)\nforall x (Mismatch(x, milissent) -> Odious(x))\nforall x (Proof(x) -> Retransmit(x, milissent))\nforall x (Immune(x) -> Proof(x))\nLuckless(milissent) -> Blob(milissent, garold)\nforall x (Retransmit(x, cher) -> Retransmit(cher, milissent))\nforall x (Retransmit(x, milissent) and Mismatch(milissent, garold) -> not Mismatch(milissent, cher))\n\nBlob(garold, milissent)\n\nBlob(garold, milissent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The felicle is aboveboard. The barnabas is bolivian. The phaidra does not see the felicle. If someone cohere the felicle then they are cognizant. If someone is aboveboard then they need the felicle. Nice people are aboveboard. If the felicle is extempore then the felicle streetwalk the barnabas. If someone brandish the phaidra then the phaidra brandish the felicle. If someone brandish the felicle and the felicle cohere the barnabas then the felicle does not see the phaidra. The felicle does not need the barnabas.", "logic": "\nAboveboard(felicle)\nBolivian(barnabas)\nnot Cohere(phaidra, felicle)\nforall x (Cohere(x, felicle) -> Cognizant(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Brandish(x, felicle))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nExtempore(felicle) -> Streetwalk(felicle, barnabas)\nforall x (Brandish(x, phaidra) -> Brandish(phaidra, felicle))\nforall x (Brandish(x, felicle) and Cohere(felicle, barnabas) -> not Cohere(felicle, phaidra))\n\nnot Brandish(felicle, barnabas)\n\nnot Brandish(felicle, barnabas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "The laryssa is sneaky. The genevra is mitigatory. The rosana does not see the laryssa. If someone raiment the laryssa then they are fastidious. If someone is sneaky then they need the laryssa. Nice people are sneaky. If the laryssa is reddened then the laryssa overboil the genevra. If someone flip the rosana then the rosana flip the laryssa. If someone flip the laryssa and the laryssa raiment the genevra then the laryssa does not see the rosana. The genevra raiment the laryssa.", "logic": "\nSneaky(laryssa)\nMitigatory(genevra)\nnot Raiment(rosana, laryssa)\nforall x (Raiment(x, laryssa) -> Fastidious(x))\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Flip(x, laryssa))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Sneaky(x))\nReddened(laryssa) -> Overboil(laryssa, genevra)\nforall x (Flip(x, rosana) -> Flip(rosana, laryssa))\nforall x (Flip(x, laryssa) and Raiment(laryssa, genevra) -> not Raiment(laryssa, rosana))\n\nRaiment(genevra, laryssa)\n\nRaiment(genevra, laryssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-349"} {"premises": "Henryetta is universal. Henryetta is demagogic. Alford is handless. Alford is gnomish. Alford is thalloid. Alford is universal. Alford is demagogic. Alford is unobserved. Imogene is applied. Imogene is handless. Imogene is thalloid. Imogene is demagogic. If something is universal then it is handless. If something is universal and handless then it is unobserved. Alford is thalloid.", "logic": "\nUniversal(henryetta)\nDemagogic(henryetta)\nHandless(alford)\nGnomish(alford)\nThalloid(alford)\nUniversal(alford)\nDemagogic(alford)\nUnobserved(alford)\nApplied(imogene)\nHandless(imogene)\nThalloid(imogene)\nDemagogic(imogene)\nforall x (Universal(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Universal(x) and Handless(x) -> Unobserved(x))\n\nThalloid(alford)\n\ntherefore Thalloid(alford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Valera is neotenic. Valera is leakproof. Ofella is ropy. Ofella is undynamic. Ofella is brushlike. Ofella is neotenic. Ofella is leakproof. Ofella is cardboard. Tracey is upstream. Tracey is ropy. Tracey is brushlike. Tracey is leakproof. If something is neotenic then it is ropy. If something is neotenic and ropy then it is cardboard. Ofella is not neotenic.", "logic": "\nNeotenic(valera)\nLeakproof(valera)\nRopy(ofella)\nUndynamic(ofella)\nBrushlike(ofella)\nNeotenic(ofella)\nLeakproof(ofella)\nCardboard(ofella)\nUpstream(tracey)\nRopy(tracey)\nBrushlike(tracey)\nLeakproof(tracey)\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Ropy(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) and Ropy(x) -> Cardboard(x))\n\nnot Neotenic(ofella)\n\ntherefore Neotenic(ofella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Rafe is monkish. Rafe is somali. Hans is pyloric. Hans is unbranded. Hans is detested. Hans is monkish. Hans is somali. Hans is trimotored. Elizabeth is missional. Elizabeth is pyloric. Elizabeth is detested. Elizabeth is somali. If something is monkish then it is pyloric. If something is monkish and pyloric then it is trimotored. Rafe is pyloric.", "logic": "\nMonkish(rafe)\nSomali(rafe)\nPyloric(hans)\nUnbranded(hans)\nDetested(hans)\nMonkish(hans)\nSomali(hans)\nTrimotored(hans)\nMissional(elizabeth)\nPyloric(elizabeth)\nDetested(elizabeth)\nSomali(elizabeth)\nforall x (Monkish(x) -> Pyloric(x))\nforall x (Monkish(x) and Pyloric(x) -> Trimotored(x))\n\nPyloric(rafe)\n\nMonkish(rafe) and forall x (Monkish(x) -> Pyloric(x)) -> therefore Pyloric(rafe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Emmaline is tropic. Emmaline is heterodox. Pet is algonquin. Pet is hellish. Pet is chunky. Pet is tropic. Pet is heterodox. Pet is kechuan. Lara is sagittate. Lara is algonquin. Lara is chunky. Lara is heterodox. If something is tropic then it is algonquin. If something is tropic and algonquin then it is kechuan. Emmaline is not algonquin.", "logic": "\nTropic(emmaline)\nHeterodox(emmaline)\nAlgonquin(pet)\nHellish(pet)\nChunky(pet)\nTropic(pet)\nHeterodox(pet)\nKechuan(pet)\nSagittate(lara)\nAlgonquin(lara)\nChunky(lara)\nHeterodox(lara)\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Algonquin(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) and Algonquin(x) -> Kechuan(x))\n\nnot Algonquin(emmaline)\n\nTropic(emmaline) and forall x (Tropic(x) -> Algonquin(x)) -> therefore Algonquin(emmaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Ebonee is murderous. Ebonee is dissuasive. Lamar is ready. Lamar is flaring. Lamar is catamenial. Lamar is murderous. Lamar is dissuasive. Lamar is servo. Kipp is bionomic. Kipp is ready. Kipp is catamenial. Kipp is dissuasive. If something is murderous then it is ready. If something is murderous and ready then it is servo. Ebonee is servo.", "logic": "\nMurderous(ebonee)\nDissuasive(ebonee)\nReady(lamar)\nFlaring(lamar)\nCatamenial(lamar)\nMurderous(lamar)\nDissuasive(lamar)\nServo(lamar)\nBionomic(kipp)\nReady(kipp)\nCatamenial(kipp)\nDissuasive(kipp)\nforall x (Murderous(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Murderous(x) and Ready(x) -> Servo(x))\n\nServo(ebonee)\n\nMurderous(ebonee) and forall x (Murderous(x) -> Ready(x)) -> therefore Ready(ebonee) Murderous(ebonee) and Ready(ebonee) and forall x (Murderous(x) and Ready(x) -> Servo(x)) -> therefore Servo(ebonee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Mmarianne is sanitized. Mmarianne is outmost. Arturo is manned. Arturo is digital. Arturo is irruptive. Arturo is sanitized. Arturo is outmost. Arturo is anisogamic. Onlea is empathic. Onlea is manned. Onlea is irruptive. Onlea is outmost. If something is sanitized then it is manned. If something is sanitized and manned then it is anisogamic. Mmarianne is not anisogamic.", "logic": "\nSanitized(mmarianne)\nOutmost(mmarianne)\nManned(arturo)\nDigital(arturo)\nIrruptive(arturo)\nSanitized(arturo)\nOutmost(arturo)\nAnisogamic(arturo)\nEmpathic(onlea)\nManned(onlea)\nIrruptive(onlea)\nOutmost(onlea)\nforall x (Sanitized(x) -> Manned(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) and Manned(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\n\nnot Anisogamic(mmarianne)\n\nSanitized(mmarianne) and forall x (Sanitized(x) -> Manned(x)) -> therefore Manned(mmarianne) Sanitized(mmarianne) and Manned(mmarianne) and forall x (Sanitized(x) and Manned(x) -> Anisogamic(x)) -> therefore Anisogamic(mmarianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Tiffie is chimeral. Tiffie is relentless. Ramonda is babelike. Ramonda is fraudulent. Ramonda is sculpted. Ramonda is chimeral. Ramonda is relentless. Ramonda is supportive. Salomo is unembodied. Salomo is babelike. Salomo is sculpted. Salomo is relentless. If something is chimeral then it is babelike. If something is chimeral and babelike then it is supportive. Salomo is not supportive.", "logic": "\nChimeral(tiffie)\nRelentless(tiffie)\nBabelike(ramonda)\nFraudulent(ramonda)\nSculpted(ramonda)\nChimeral(ramonda)\nRelentless(ramonda)\nSupportive(ramonda)\nUnembodied(salomo)\nBabelike(salomo)\nSculpted(salomo)\nRelentless(salomo)\nforall x (Chimeral(x) -> Babelike(x))\nforall x (Chimeral(x) and Babelike(x) -> Supportive(x))\n\nnot Supportive(salomo)\n\nforall x (Chimeral(x) and Babelike(x) -> Supportive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Keith is monogynic. Keith is chasidic. Freida is vapourific. Freida is tabular. Freida is arid. Freida is monogynic. Freida is chasidic. Freida is flavorless. Barny is unlivable. Barny is vapourific. Barny is arid. Barny is chasidic. If something is monogynic then it is vapourific. If something is monogynic and vapourific then it is flavorless. Barny is monogynic.", "logic": "\nMonogynic(keith)\nChasidic(keith)\nVapourific(freida)\nTabular(freida)\nArid(freida)\nMonogynic(freida)\nChasidic(freida)\nFlavorless(freida)\nUnlivable(barny)\nVapourific(barny)\nArid(barny)\nChasidic(barny)\nforall x (Monogynic(x) -> Vapourific(x))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) and Vapourific(x) -> Flavorless(x))\n\nMonogynic(barny)\n\nMonogynic(barny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Steffane is anxious. Steffane is uphill. Jereme is champion. Jereme is peninsular. Jereme is maddening. Jereme is anxious. Jereme is uphill. Jereme is amorous. Mallorie is abasic. Mallorie is champion. Mallorie is maddening. Mallorie is uphill. If something is anxious then it is champion. If something is anxious and champion then it is amorous. Steffane is not abasic.", "logic": "\nAnxious(steffane)\nUphill(steffane)\nChampion(jereme)\nPeninsular(jereme)\nMaddening(jereme)\nAnxious(jereme)\nUphill(jereme)\nAmorous(jereme)\nAbasic(mallorie)\nChampion(mallorie)\nMaddening(mallorie)\nUphill(mallorie)\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Champion(x))\nforall x (Anxious(x) and Champion(x) -> Amorous(x))\n\nnot Abasic(steffane)\n\nnot Abasic(steffane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Kareem is littoral. Kareem is continent. Case is fitted. Case is unadorned. Case is venereal. Case is littoral. Case is continent. Case is bitumenoid. Ruthy is awake. Ruthy is fitted. Ruthy is venereal. Ruthy is continent. If something is littoral then it is fitted. If something is littoral and fitted then it is bitumenoid. Ruthy is unadorned.", "logic": "\nLittoral(kareem)\nContinent(kareem)\nFitted(case)\nUnadorned(case)\nVenereal(case)\nLittoral(case)\nContinent(case)\nBitumenoid(case)\nAwake(ruthy)\nFitted(ruthy)\nVenereal(ruthy)\nContinent(ruthy)\nforall x (Littoral(x) -> Fitted(x))\nforall x (Littoral(x) and Fitted(x) -> Bitumenoid(x))\n\nUnadorned(ruthy)\n\nUnadorned(ruthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Horacio is epicarpal. Horacio is reformist. Cindy is outre. Cindy is funerary. Cindy is later. Cindy is epicarpal. Cindy is reformist. Cindy is offsides. Ludwig is uncharged. Ludwig is outre. Ludwig is later. Ludwig is reformist. If something is epicarpal then it is outre. If something is epicarpal and outre then it is offsides. Horacio is not later.", "logic": "\nEpicarpal(horacio)\nReformist(horacio)\nOutre(cindy)\nFunerary(cindy)\nLater(cindy)\nEpicarpal(cindy)\nReformist(cindy)\nOffsides(cindy)\nUncharged(ludwig)\nOutre(ludwig)\nLater(ludwig)\nReformist(ludwig)\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) -> Outre(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) and Outre(x) -> Offsides(x))\n\nnot Later(horacio)\n\nnot Later(horacio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "Allah is fore. Allah is marooned. Viv is basinal. Viv is eventful. Viv is livable. Viv is fore. Viv is marooned. Viv is imperial. Kevyn is humped. Kevyn is basinal. Kevyn is livable. Kevyn is marooned. If something is fore then it is basinal. If something is fore and basinal then it is imperial. Viv is humped.", "logic": "\nFore(allah)\nMarooned(allah)\nBasinal(viv)\nEventful(viv)\nLivable(viv)\nFore(viv)\nMarooned(viv)\nImperial(viv)\nHumped(kevyn)\nBasinal(kevyn)\nLivable(kevyn)\nMarooned(kevyn)\nforall x (Fore(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Fore(x) and Basinal(x) -> Imperial(x))\n\nHumped(viv)\n\nHumped(viv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1458"} {"premises": "The cooper cheep the devondra. The cooper castle the joao. The cooper is not mutagenic. The devondra does not eat the joao. The devondra is not mutagenic. The joao cheep the devondra. The joao castle the devondra. The joao is bookable. The joao is mucose. The joao embarrass the cooper. If someone castle the joao then the joao castle the cooper. If the cooper does not eat the joao then the joao castle the cooper. If someone embarrass the joao then the joao is bookable. If the joao cheep the devondra and the joao castle the cooper then the joao embarrass the devondra. If the cooper cheep the joao then the joao castle the devondra. If someone is carthusian and they eat the devondra then they are mucose. If the cooper is carthusian and the cooper castle the devondra then the cooper cheep the joao. If someone embarrass the devondra and they are mutagenic then they are bookable. The cooper castle the joao.", "logic": "\nCheep(cooper, devondra)\nCastle(cooper, joao)\nnot Mutagenic(cooper)\nnot Castle(devondra, joao)\nnot Mutagenic(devondra)\nCheep(joao, devondra)\nCastle(joao, devondra)\nBookable(joao)\nMucose(joao)\nEmbarrass(joao, cooper)\nforall x (Castle(x, joao) -> Castle(joao, cooper))\nnot Castle(cooper, joao) -> Castle(joao, cooper)\nforall x (Embarrass(x, joao) -> Bookable(joao))\nCheep(joao, devondra) and Castle(joao, cooper) -> Embarrass(joao, devondra)\nCheep(cooper, joao) -> Castle(joao, devondra)\nforall x (Carthusian(x) and Castle(x, devondra) -> Mucose(x))\nCarthusian(cooper) and Castle(cooper, devondra) -> Cheep(cooper, joao)\nforall x (Embarrass(x, devondra) and Mutagenic(x) -> Bookable(x))\n\nCastle(cooper, joao)\n\ntherefore Castle(cooper, joao)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The prudence outfox the jordon. The prudence swot the eilis. The prudence is not sunburned. The jordon does not eat the eilis. The jordon is not sunburned. The eilis outfox the jordon. The eilis swot the jordon. The eilis is columbian. The eilis is laputan. The eilis condemn the prudence. If someone swot the eilis then the eilis swot the prudence. If the prudence does not eat the eilis then the eilis swot the prudence. If someone condemn the eilis then the eilis is columbian. If the eilis outfox the jordon and the eilis swot the prudence then the eilis condemn the jordon. If the prudence outfox the eilis then the eilis swot the jordon. If someone is incitive and they eat the jordon then they are laputan. If the prudence is incitive and the prudence swot the jordon then the prudence outfox the eilis. If someone condemn the jordon and they are sunburned then they are columbian. The prudence is sunburned.", "logic": "\nOutfox(prudence, jordon)\nSwot(prudence, eilis)\nnot Sunburned(prudence)\nnot Swot(jordon, eilis)\nnot Sunburned(jordon)\nOutfox(eilis, jordon)\nSwot(eilis, jordon)\nColumbian(eilis)\nLaputan(eilis)\nCondemn(eilis, prudence)\nforall x (Swot(x, eilis) -> Swot(eilis, prudence))\nnot Swot(prudence, eilis) -> Swot(eilis, prudence)\nforall x (Condemn(x, eilis) -> Columbian(eilis))\nOutfox(eilis, jordon) and Swot(eilis, prudence) -> Condemn(eilis, jordon)\nOutfox(prudence, eilis) -> Swot(eilis, jordon)\nforall x (Incitive(x) and Swot(x, jordon) -> Laputan(x))\nIncitive(prudence) and Swot(prudence, jordon) -> Outfox(prudence, eilis)\nforall x (Condemn(x, jordon) and Sunburned(x) -> Columbian(x))\n\nSunburned(prudence)\n\ntherefore not Sunburned(prudence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The alma trump the bartie. The alma adduct the lorelei. The alma is not filthy. The bartie does not eat the lorelei. The bartie is not filthy. The lorelei trump the bartie. The lorelei adduct the bartie. The lorelei is crotchety. The lorelei is slumbery. The lorelei quintuple the alma. If someone adduct the lorelei then the lorelei adduct the alma. If the alma does not eat the lorelei then the lorelei adduct the alma. If someone quintuple the lorelei then the lorelei is crotchety. If the lorelei trump the bartie and the lorelei adduct the alma then the lorelei quintuple the bartie. If the alma trump the lorelei then the lorelei adduct the bartie. If someone is childless and they eat the bartie then they are slumbery. If the alma is childless and the alma adduct the bartie then the alma trump the lorelei. If someone quintuple the bartie and they are filthy then they are crotchety. The lorelei adduct the alma.", "logic": "\nTrump(alma, bartie)\nAdduct(alma, lorelei)\nnot Filthy(alma)\nnot Adduct(bartie, lorelei)\nnot Filthy(bartie)\nTrump(lorelei, bartie)\nAdduct(lorelei, bartie)\nCrotchety(lorelei)\nSlumbery(lorelei)\nQuintuple(lorelei, alma)\nforall x (Adduct(x, lorelei) -> Adduct(lorelei, alma))\nnot Adduct(alma, lorelei) -> Adduct(lorelei, alma)\nforall x (Quintuple(x, lorelei) -> Crotchety(lorelei))\nTrump(lorelei, bartie) and Adduct(lorelei, alma) -> Quintuple(lorelei, bartie)\nTrump(alma, lorelei) -> Adduct(lorelei, bartie)\nforall x (Childless(x) and Adduct(x, bartie) -> Slumbery(x))\nChildless(alma) and Adduct(alma, bartie) -> Trump(alma, lorelei)\nforall x (Quintuple(x, bartie) and Filthy(x) -> Crotchety(x))\n\nAdduct(lorelei, alma)\n\nAdduct(alma, lorelei) and forall x (Adduct(x, lorelei) -> Adduct(lorelei, alma)) -> therefore Adduct(lorelei, alma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The marielle improvize the lev. The marielle beplaster the caroleen. The marielle is not communal. The lev does not eat the caroleen. The lev is not communal. The caroleen improvize the lev. The caroleen beplaster the lev. The caroleen is chapfallen. The caroleen is undiluted. The caroleen visa the marielle. If someone beplaster the caroleen then the caroleen beplaster the marielle. If the marielle does not eat the caroleen then the caroleen beplaster the marielle. If someone visa the caroleen then the caroleen is chapfallen. If the caroleen improvize the lev and the caroleen beplaster the marielle then the caroleen visa the lev. If the marielle improvize the caroleen then the caroleen beplaster the lev. If someone is benthic and they eat the lev then they are undiluted. If the marielle is benthic and the marielle beplaster the lev then the marielle improvize the caroleen. If someone visa the lev and they are communal then they are chapfallen. The caroleen does not eat the marielle.", "logic": "\nImprovize(marielle, lev)\nBeplaster(marielle, caroleen)\nnot Communal(marielle)\nnot Beplaster(lev, caroleen)\nnot Communal(lev)\nImprovize(caroleen, lev)\nBeplaster(caroleen, lev)\nChapfallen(caroleen)\nUndiluted(caroleen)\nVisa(caroleen, marielle)\nforall x (Beplaster(x, caroleen) -> Beplaster(caroleen, marielle))\nnot Beplaster(marielle, caroleen) -> Beplaster(caroleen, marielle)\nforall x (Visa(x, caroleen) -> Chapfallen(caroleen))\nImprovize(caroleen, lev) and Beplaster(caroleen, marielle) -> Visa(caroleen, lev)\nImprovize(marielle, caroleen) -> Beplaster(caroleen, lev)\nforall x (Benthic(x) and Beplaster(x, lev) -> Undiluted(x))\nBenthic(marielle) and Beplaster(marielle, lev) -> Improvize(marielle, caroleen)\nforall x (Visa(x, lev) and Communal(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\n\nnot Beplaster(caroleen, marielle)\n\nBeplaster(marielle, caroleen) and forall x (Beplaster(x, caroleen) -> Beplaster(caroleen, marielle)) -> therefore Beplaster(caroleen, marielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The russel speak the tabbatha. The russel monitor the chloris. The russel is not surly. The tabbatha does not eat the chloris. The tabbatha is not surly. The chloris speak the tabbatha. The chloris monitor the tabbatha. The chloris is scythian. The chloris is ungenerous. The chloris decompress the russel. If someone monitor the chloris then the chloris monitor the russel. If the russel does not eat the chloris then the chloris monitor the russel. If someone decompress the chloris then the chloris is scythian. If the chloris speak the tabbatha and the chloris monitor the russel then the chloris decompress the tabbatha. If the russel speak the chloris then the chloris monitor the tabbatha. If someone is uncomplete and they eat the tabbatha then they are ungenerous. If the russel is uncomplete and the russel monitor the tabbatha then the russel speak the chloris. If someone decompress the tabbatha and they are surly then they are scythian. The chloris decompress the tabbatha.", "logic": "\nSpeak(russel, tabbatha)\nMonitor(russel, chloris)\nnot Surly(russel)\nnot Monitor(tabbatha, chloris)\nnot Surly(tabbatha)\nSpeak(chloris, tabbatha)\nMonitor(chloris, tabbatha)\nScythian(chloris)\nUngenerous(chloris)\nDecompress(chloris, russel)\nforall x (Monitor(x, chloris) -> Monitor(chloris, russel))\nnot Monitor(russel, chloris) -> Monitor(chloris, russel)\nforall x (Decompress(x, chloris) -> Scythian(chloris))\nSpeak(chloris, tabbatha) and Monitor(chloris, russel) -> Decompress(chloris, tabbatha)\nSpeak(russel, chloris) -> Monitor(chloris, tabbatha)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Monitor(x, tabbatha) -> Ungenerous(x))\nUncomplete(russel) and Monitor(russel, tabbatha) -> Speak(russel, chloris)\nforall x (Decompress(x, tabbatha) and Surly(x) -> Scythian(x))\n\nDecompress(chloris, tabbatha)\n\nMonitor(russel, chloris) and forall x (Monitor(x, chloris) -> Monitor(chloris, russel)) -> therefore Monitor(chloris, russel) Speak(chloris, tabbatha) and Monitor(chloris, russel) and Speak(chloris, tabbatha) and Monitor(chloris, russel) -> Decompress(chloris, tabbatha) -> therefore Decompress(chloris, tabbatha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The moishe encounter the dorrie. The moishe quantise the alis. The moishe is not daedal. The dorrie does not eat the alis. The dorrie is not daedal. The alis encounter the dorrie. The alis quantise the dorrie. The alis is dictated. The alis is renunciant. The alis compare the moishe. If someone quantise the alis then the alis quantise the moishe. If the moishe does not eat the alis then the alis quantise the moishe. If someone compare the alis then the alis is dictated. If the alis encounter the dorrie and the alis quantise the moishe then the alis compare the dorrie. If the moishe encounter the alis then the alis quantise the dorrie. If someone is equestrian and they eat the dorrie then they are renunciant. If the moishe is equestrian and the moishe quantise the dorrie then the moishe encounter the alis. If someone compare the dorrie and they are daedal then they are dictated. The alis does not see the dorrie.", "logic": "\nEncounter(moishe, dorrie)\nQuantise(moishe, alis)\nnot Daedal(moishe)\nnot Quantise(dorrie, alis)\nnot Daedal(dorrie)\nEncounter(alis, dorrie)\nQuantise(alis, dorrie)\nDictated(alis)\nRenunciant(alis)\nCompare(alis, moishe)\nforall x (Quantise(x, alis) -> Quantise(alis, moishe))\nnot Quantise(moishe, alis) -> Quantise(alis, moishe)\nforall x (Compare(x, alis) -> Dictated(alis))\nEncounter(alis, dorrie) and Quantise(alis, moishe) -> Compare(alis, dorrie)\nEncounter(moishe, alis) -> Quantise(alis, dorrie)\nforall x (Equestrian(x) and Quantise(x, dorrie) -> Renunciant(x))\nEquestrian(moishe) and Quantise(moishe, dorrie) -> Encounter(moishe, alis)\nforall x (Compare(x, dorrie) and Daedal(x) -> Dictated(x))\n\nnot Compare(alis, dorrie)\n\nQuantise(moishe, alis) and forall x (Quantise(x, alis) -> Quantise(alis, moishe)) -> therefore Quantise(alis, moishe) Encounter(alis, dorrie) and Quantise(alis, moishe) and Encounter(alis, dorrie) and Quantise(alis, moishe) -> Compare(alis, dorrie) -> therefore Compare(alis, dorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The munmro furbish the edgardo. The munmro overmaster the fran. The munmro is not further. The edgardo does not eat the fran. The edgardo is not further. The fran furbish the edgardo. The fran overmaster the edgardo. The fran is dyspnoeal. The fran is incurious. The fran behove the munmro. If someone overmaster the fran then the fran overmaster the munmro. If the munmro does not eat the fran then the fran overmaster the munmro. If someone behove the fran then the fran is dyspnoeal. If the fran furbish the edgardo and the fran overmaster the munmro then the fran behove the edgardo. If the munmro furbish the fran then the fran overmaster the edgardo. If someone is nonplussed and they eat the edgardo then they are incurious. If the munmro is nonplussed and the munmro overmaster the edgardo then the munmro furbish the fran. If someone behove the edgardo and they are further then they are dyspnoeal. The munmro is not dyspnoeal.", "logic": "\nFurbish(munmro, edgardo)\nOvermaster(munmro, fran)\nnot Further(munmro)\nnot Overmaster(edgardo, fran)\nnot Further(edgardo)\nFurbish(fran, edgardo)\nOvermaster(fran, edgardo)\nDyspnoeal(fran)\nIncurious(fran)\nBehove(fran, munmro)\nforall x (Overmaster(x, fran) -> Overmaster(fran, munmro))\nnot Overmaster(munmro, fran) -> Overmaster(fran, munmro)\nforall x (Behove(x, fran) -> Dyspnoeal(fran))\nFurbish(fran, edgardo) and Overmaster(fran, munmro) -> Behove(fran, edgardo)\nFurbish(munmro, fran) -> Overmaster(fran, edgardo)\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) and Overmaster(x, edgardo) -> Incurious(x))\nNonplussed(munmro) and Overmaster(munmro, edgardo) -> Furbish(munmro, fran)\nforall x (Behove(x, edgardo) and Further(x) -> Dyspnoeal(x))\n\nnot Dyspnoeal(munmro)\n\nforall x (Behove(x, edgardo) and Further(x) -> Dyspnoeal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The corette bristle the fredi. The corette heterodyne the sheelagh. The corette is not slithery. The fredi does not eat the sheelagh. The fredi is not slithery. The sheelagh bristle the fredi. The sheelagh heterodyne the fredi. The sheelagh is agelong. The sheelagh is dilatory. The sheelagh extol the corette. If someone heterodyne the sheelagh then the sheelagh heterodyne the corette. If the corette does not eat the sheelagh then the sheelagh heterodyne the corette. If someone extol the sheelagh then the sheelagh is agelong. If the sheelagh bristle the fredi and the sheelagh heterodyne the corette then the sheelagh extol the fredi. If the corette bristle the sheelagh then the sheelagh heterodyne the fredi. If someone is medicative and they eat the fredi then they are dilatory. If the corette is medicative and the corette heterodyne the fredi then the corette bristle the sheelagh. If someone extol the fredi and they are slithery then they are agelong. The fredi is dilatory.", "logic": "\nBristle(corette, fredi)\nHeterodyne(corette, sheelagh)\nnot Slithery(corette)\nnot Heterodyne(fredi, sheelagh)\nnot Slithery(fredi)\nBristle(sheelagh, fredi)\nHeterodyne(sheelagh, fredi)\nAgelong(sheelagh)\nDilatory(sheelagh)\nExtol(sheelagh, corette)\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, sheelagh) -> Heterodyne(sheelagh, corette))\nnot Heterodyne(corette, sheelagh) -> Heterodyne(sheelagh, corette)\nforall x (Extol(x, sheelagh) -> Agelong(sheelagh))\nBristle(sheelagh, fredi) and Heterodyne(sheelagh, corette) -> Extol(sheelagh, fredi)\nBristle(corette, sheelagh) -> Heterodyne(sheelagh, fredi)\nforall x (Medicative(x) and Heterodyne(x, fredi) -> Dilatory(x))\nMedicative(corette) and Heterodyne(corette, fredi) -> Bristle(corette, sheelagh)\nforall x (Extol(x, fredi) and Slithery(x) -> Agelong(x))\n\nDilatory(fredi)\n\nforall x (Medicative(x) and Heterodyne(x, fredi) -> Dilatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The yardley subtract the ignacius. The yardley weightlift the graham. The yardley is not stainable. The ignacius does not eat the graham. The ignacius is not stainable. The graham subtract the ignacius. The graham weightlift the ignacius. The graham is acapnial. The graham is amalgamate. The graham yack the yardley. If someone weightlift the graham then the graham weightlift the yardley. If the yardley does not eat the graham then the graham weightlift the yardley. If someone yack the graham then the graham is acapnial. If the graham subtract the ignacius and the graham weightlift the yardley then the graham yack the ignacius. If the yardley subtract the graham then the graham weightlift the ignacius. If someone is plumy and they eat the ignacius then they are amalgamate. If the yardley is plumy and the yardley weightlift the ignacius then the yardley subtract the graham. If someone yack the ignacius and they are stainable then they are acapnial. The yardley is not amalgamate.", "logic": "\nSubtract(yardley, ignacius)\nWeightlift(yardley, graham)\nnot Stainable(yardley)\nnot Weightlift(ignacius, graham)\nnot Stainable(ignacius)\nSubtract(graham, ignacius)\nWeightlift(graham, ignacius)\nAcapnial(graham)\nAmalgamate(graham)\nYack(graham, yardley)\nforall x (Weightlift(x, graham) -> Weightlift(graham, yardley))\nnot Weightlift(yardley, graham) -> Weightlift(graham, yardley)\nforall x (Yack(x, graham) -> Acapnial(graham))\nSubtract(graham, ignacius) and Weightlift(graham, yardley) -> Yack(graham, ignacius)\nSubtract(yardley, graham) -> Weightlift(graham, ignacius)\nforall x (Plumy(x) and Weightlift(x, ignacius) -> Amalgamate(x))\nPlumy(yardley) and Weightlift(yardley, ignacius) -> Subtract(yardley, graham)\nforall x (Yack(x, ignacius) and Stainable(x) -> Acapnial(x))\n\nnot Amalgamate(yardley)\n\nforall x (Plumy(x) and Weightlift(x, ignacius) -> Amalgamate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The lynnet mongrelise the pet. The lynnet line the beulah. The lynnet is not vehicular. The pet does not eat the beulah. The pet is not vehicular. The beulah mongrelise the pet. The beulah line the pet. The beulah is inharmonic. The beulah is shuttered. The beulah exult the lynnet. If someone line the beulah then the beulah line the lynnet. If the lynnet does not eat the beulah then the beulah line the lynnet. If someone exult the beulah then the beulah is inharmonic. If the beulah mongrelise the pet and the beulah line the lynnet then the beulah exult the pet. If the lynnet mongrelise the beulah then the beulah line the pet. If someone is unpeopled and they eat the pet then they are shuttered. If the lynnet is unpeopled and the lynnet line the pet then the lynnet mongrelise the beulah. If someone exult the pet and they are vehicular then they are inharmonic. The pet is red.", "logic": "\nMongrelise(lynnet, pet)\nLine(lynnet, beulah)\nnot Vehicular(lynnet)\nnot Line(pet, beulah)\nnot Vehicular(pet)\nMongrelise(beulah, pet)\nLine(beulah, pet)\nInharmonic(beulah)\nShuttered(beulah)\nExult(beulah, lynnet)\nforall x (Line(x, beulah) -> Line(beulah, lynnet))\nnot Line(lynnet, beulah) -> Line(beulah, lynnet)\nforall x (Exult(x, beulah) -> Inharmonic(beulah))\nMongrelise(beulah, pet) and Line(beulah, lynnet) -> Exult(beulah, pet)\nMongrelise(lynnet, beulah) -> Line(beulah, pet)\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) and Line(x, pet) -> Shuttered(x))\nUnpeopled(lynnet) and Line(lynnet, pet) -> Mongrelise(lynnet, beulah)\nforall x (Exult(x, pet) and Vehicular(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\n\nRed(pet)\n\nRed(pet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The mariam languish the issy. The mariam effuse the rozina. The mariam is not housebound. The issy does not eat the rozina. The issy is not housebound. The rozina languish the issy. The rozina effuse the issy. The rozina is roily. The rozina is pedate. The rozina aerify the mariam. If someone effuse the rozina then the rozina effuse the mariam. If the mariam does not eat the rozina then the rozina effuse the mariam. If someone aerify the rozina then the rozina is roily. If the rozina languish the issy and the rozina effuse the mariam then the rozina aerify the issy. If the mariam languish the rozina then the rozina effuse the issy. If someone is susurrous and they eat the issy then they are pedate. If the mariam is susurrous and the mariam effuse the issy then the mariam languish the rozina. If someone aerify the issy and they are housebound then they are roily. The issy does not eat the mariam.", "logic": "\nLanguish(mariam, issy)\nEffuse(mariam, rozina)\nnot Housebound(mariam)\nnot Effuse(issy, rozina)\nnot Housebound(issy)\nLanguish(rozina, issy)\nEffuse(rozina, issy)\nRoily(rozina)\nPedate(rozina)\nAerify(rozina, mariam)\nforall x (Effuse(x, rozina) -> Effuse(rozina, mariam))\nnot Effuse(mariam, rozina) -> Effuse(rozina, mariam)\nforall x (Aerify(x, rozina) -> Roily(rozina))\nLanguish(rozina, issy) and Effuse(rozina, mariam) -> Aerify(rozina, issy)\nLanguish(mariam, rozina) -> Effuse(rozina, issy)\nforall x (Susurrous(x) and Effuse(x, issy) -> Pedate(x))\nSusurrous(mariam) and Effuse(mariam, issy) -> Languish(mariam, rozina)\nforall x (Aerify(x, issy) and Housebound(x) -> Roily(x))\n\nnot Effuse(issy, mariam)\n\nnot Effuse(issy, mariam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The harri appal the dexter. The harri meander the charline. The harri is not hindermost. The dexter does not eat the charline. The dexter is not hindermost. The charline appal the dexter. The charline meander the dexter. The charline is unlipped. The charline is soled. The charline bulletin the harri. If someone meander the charline then the charline meander the harri. If the harri does not eat the charline then the charline meander the harri. If someone bulletin the charline then the charline is unlipped. If the charline appal the dexter and the charline meander the harri then the charline bulletin the dexter. If the harri appal the charline then the charline meander the dexter. If someone is nasty and they eat the dexter then they are soled. If the harri is nasty and the harri meander the dexter then the harri appal the charline. If someone bulletin the dexter and they are hindermost then they are unlipped. The dexter appal the harri.", "logic": "\nAppal(harri, dexter)\nMeander(harri, charline)\nnot Hindermost(harri)\nnot Meander(dexter, charline)\nnot Hindermost(dexter)\nAppal(charline, dexter)\nMeander(charline, dexter)\nUnlipped(charline)\nSoled(charline)\nBulletin(charline, harri)\nforall x (Meander(x, charline) -> Meander(charline, harri))\nnot Meander(harri, charline) -> Meander(charline, harri)\nforall x (Bulletin(x, charline) -> Unlipped(charline))\nAppal(charline, dexter) and Meander(charline, harri) -> Bulletin(charline, dexter)\nAppal(harri, charline) -> Meander(charline, dexter)\nforall x (Nasty(x) and Meander(x, dexter) -> Soled(x))\nNasty(harri) and Meander(harri, dexter) -> Appal(harri, charline)\nforall x (Bulletin(x, dexter) and Hindermost(x) -> Unlipped(x))\n\nAppal(dexter, harri)\n\nAppal(dexter, harri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The wenonah is fervid. The wenonah is beaked. The wenonah tink the patrik. The anastasia does not eat the wenonah. The anastasia is not stemmatic. The anastasia behove the wenonah. The anastasia tink the patrik. The patrik is fervid. The patrik does not see the anastasia. The patrik tink the anastasia. If something tink the patrik and the patrik is fervid then it behove the patrik. If something is fervid then it tink the patrik. The wenonah is fervid.", "logic": "\nFervid(wenonah)\nBeaked(wenonah)\nTink(wenonah, patrik)\nnot Commence(anastasia, wenonah)\nnot Stemmatic(anastasia)\nBehove(anastasia, wenonah)\nTink(anastasia, patrik)\nFervid(patrik)\nnot Behove(patrik, anastasia)\nTink(patrik, anastasia)\nforall x (Tink(x, patrik) and Fervid(patrik) -> Behove(x, patrik))\nforall x (Fervid(x) -> Tink(x, patrik))\n\nFervid(wenonah)\n\ntherefore Fervid(wenonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The trevar is disloyal. The trevar is taupe. The trevar encamp the suzzy. The clark does not eat the trevar. The clark is not snobby. The clark bean the trevar. The clark encamp the suzzy. The suzzy is disloyal. The suzzy does not see the clark. The suzzy encamp the clark. If something encamp the suzzy and the suzzy is disloyal then it bean the suzzy. If something is disloyal then it encamp the suzzy. The suzzy bean the clark.", "logic": "\nDisloyal(trevar)\nTaupe(trevar)\nEncamp(trevar, suzzy)\nnot Sample(clark, trevar)\nnot Snobby(clark)\nBean(clark, trevar)\nEncamp(clark, suzzy)\nDisloyal(suzzy)\nnot Bean(suzzy, clark)\nEncamp(suzzy, clark)\nforall x (Encamp(x, suzzy) and Disloyal(suzzy) -> Bean(x, suzzy))\nforall x (Disloyal(x) -> Encamp(x, suzzy))\n\nBean(suzzy, clark)\n\ntherefore not Bean(suzzy, clark)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The martelle is subject. The martelle is cacogenic. The martelle archive the evvie. The orelia does not eat the martelle. The orelia is not decided. The orelia census the martelle. The orelia archive the evvie. The evvie is subject. The evvie does not see the orelia. The evvie archive the orelia. If something archive the evvie and the evvie is subject then it census the evvie. If something is subject then it archive the evvie. The orelia census the evvie.", "logic": "\nSubject(martelle)\nCacogenic(martelle)\nArchive(martelle, evvie)\nnot Agenize(orelia, martelle)\nnot Decided(orelia)\nCensus(orelia, martelle)\nArchive(orelia, evvie)\nSubject(evvie)\nnot Census(evvie, orelia)\nArchive(evvie, orelia)\nforall x (Archive(x, evvie) and Subject(evvie) -> Census(x, evvie))\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Archive(x, evvie))\n\nCensus(orelia, evvie)\n\nArchive(orelia, evvie) and Subject(evvie) and forall x (Archive(x, evvie) and Subject(evvie) -> Census(x, evvie)) -> therefore Census(orelia, evvie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The wit is powdered. The wit is frowzled. The wit ante the klee. The gusty does not eat the wit. The gusty is not vestiary. The gusty shoot the wit. The gusty ante the klee. The klee is powdered. The klee does not see the gusty. The klee ante the gusty. If something ante the klee and the klee is powdered then it shoot the klee. If something is powdered then it ante the klee. The klee does not visit the klee.", "logic": "\nPowdered(wit)\nFrowzled(wit)\nAnte(wit, klee)\nnot Impale(gusty, wit)\nnot Vestiary(gusty)\nShoot(gusty, wit)\nAnte(gusty, klee)\nPowdered(klee)\nnot Shoot(klee, gusty)\nAnte(klee, gusty)\nforall x (Ante(x, klee) and Powdered(klee) -> Shoot(x, klee))\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Ante(x, klee))\n\nnot Ante(klee, klee)\n\nPowdered(klee) and forall x (Powdered(x) -> Ante(x, klee)) -> therefore Ante(klee, klee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The junie is deuced. The junie is autonomic. The junie normalise the palmer. The wesley does not eat the junie. The wesley is not boned. The wesley hark the junie. The wesley normalise the palmer. The palmer is deuced. The palmer does not see the wesley. The palmer normalise the wesley. If something normalise the palmer and the palmer is deuced then it hark the palmer. If something is deuced then it normalise the palmer. The palmer hark the palmer.", "logic": "\nDeuced(junie)\nAutonomic(junie)\nNormalise(junie, palmer)\nnot Damn(wesley, junie)\nnot Boned(wesley)\nHark(wesley, junie)\nNormalise(wesley, palmer)\nDeuced(palmer)\nnot Hark(palmer, wesley)\nNormalise(palmer, wesley)\nforall x (Normalise(x, palmer) and Deuced(palmer) -> Hark(x, palmer))\nforall x (Deuced(x) -> Normalise(x, palmer))\n\nHark(palmer, palmer)\n\nDeuced(palmer) and forall x (Deuced(x) -> Normalise(x, palmer)) -> therefore Normalise(palmer, palmer) Normalise(palmer, palmer) and Deuced(palmer) and forall x (Normalise(x, palmer) and Deuced(palmer) -> Hark(x, palmer)) -> therefore Hark(palmer, palmer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The blondelle is voluptuous. The blondelle is feculent. The blondelle disburse the neale. The avril does not eat the blondelle. The avril is not additional. The avril accustom the blondelle. The avril disburse the neale. The neale is voluptuous. The neale does not see the avril. The neale disburse the avril. If something disburse the neale and the neale is voluptuous then it accustom the neale. If something is voluptuous then it disburse the neale. The neale does not see the neale.", "logic": "\nVoluptuous(blondelle)\nFeculent(blondelle)\nDisburse(blondelle, neale)\nnot Betray(avril, blondelle)\nnot Additional(avril)\nAccustom(avril, blondelle)\nDisburse(avril, neale)\nVoluptuous(neale)\nnot Accustom(neale, avril)\nDisburse(neale, avril)\nforall x (Disburse(x, neale) and Voluptuous(neale) -> Accustom(x, neale))\nforall x (Voluptuous(x) -> Disburse(x, neale))\n\nnot Accustom(neale, neale)\n\nVoluptuous(neale) and forall x (Voluptuous(x) -> Disburse(x, neale)) -> therefore Disburse(neale, neale) Disburse(neale, neale) and Voluptuous(neale) and forall x (Disburse(x, neale) and Voluptuous(neale) -> Accustom(x, neale)) -> therefore Accustom(neale, neale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The gunvor is whippy. The gunvor is duncish. The gunvor vitaminise the dorri. The nana does not eat the gunvor. The nana is not eellike. The nana furlough the gunvor. The nana vitaminise the dorri. The dorri is whippy. The dorri does not see the nana. The dorri vitaminise the nana. If something vitaminise the dorri and the dorri is whippy then it furlough the dorri. If something is whippy then it vitaminise the dorri. The dorri does not eat the nana.", "logic": "\nWhippy(gunvor)\nDuncish(gunvor)\nVitaminise(gunvor, dorri)\nnot Condone(nana, gunvor)\nnot Eellike(nana)\nFurlough(nana, gunvor)\nVitaminise(nana, dorri)\nWhippy(dorri)\nnot Furlough(dorri, nana)\nVitaminise(dorri, nana)\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, dorri) and Whippy(dorri) -> Furlough(x, dorri))\nforall x (Whippy(x) -> Vitaminise(x, dorri))\n\nnot Condone(dorri, nana)\n\nnot Condone(dorri, nana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The noelyn is paved. The noelyn is maternal. The noelyn supplicate the carolyn. The wesley does not eat the noelyn. The wesley is not omniscient. The wesley queen the noelyn. The wesley supplicate the carolyn. The carolyn is paved. The carolyn does not see the wesley. The carolyn supplicate the wesley. If something supplicate the carolyn and the carolyn is paved then it queen the carolyn. If something is paved then it supplicate the carolyn. The noelyn is blue.", "logic": "\nPaved(noelyn)\nMaternal(noelyn)\nSupplicate(noelyn, carolyn)\nnot Melanise(wesley, noelyn)\nnot Omniscient(wesley)\nQueen(wesley, noelyn)\nSupplicate(wesley, carolyn)\nPaved(carolyn)\nnot Queen(carolyn, wesley)\nSupplicate(carolyn, wesley)\nforall x (Supplicate(x, carolyn) and Paved(carolyn) -> Queen(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Paved(x) -> Supplicate(x, carolyn))\n\nBlue(noelyn)\n\nBlue(noelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The junie is thick. The junie is axenic. The junie faze the riannon. The christyna does not eat the junie. The christyna is not astonied. The christyna remark the junie. The christyna faze the riannon. The riannon is thick. The riannon does not see the christyna. The riannon faze the christyna. If something faze the riannon and the riannon is thick then it remark the riannon. If something is thick then it faze the riannon. The junie does not see the junie.", "logic": "\nThick(junie)\nAxenic(junie)\nFaze(junie, riannon)\nnot Realise(christyna, junie)\nnot Astonied(christyna)\nRemark(christyna, junie)\nFaze(christyna, riannon)\nThick(riannon)\nnot Remark(riannon, christyna)\nFaze(riannon, christyna)\nforall x (Faze(x, riannon) and Thick(riannon) -> Remark(x, riannon))\nforall x (Thick(x) -> Faze(x, riannon))\n\nnot Remark(junie, junie)\n\nnot Remark(junie, junie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The claudina is nonsocial. The claudina is concealed. The claudina unstrap the dotty. The lev does not eat the claudina. The lev is not estrous. The lev satisfise the claudina. The lev unstrap the dotty. The dotty is nonsocial. The dotty does not see the lev. The dotty unstrap the lev. If something unstrap the dotty and the dotty is nonsocial then it satisfise the dotty. If something is nonsocial then it unstrap the dotty. The lev unstrap the claudina.", "logic": "\nNonsocial(claudina)\nConcealed(claudina)\nUnstrap(claudina, dotty)\nnot Streamline(lev, claudina)\nnot Estrous(lev)\nSatisfise(lev, claudina)\nUnstrap(lev, dotty)\nNonsocial(dotty)\nnot Satisfise(dotty, lev)\nUnstrap(dotty, lev)\nforall x (Unstrap(x, dotty) and Nonsocial(dotty) -> Satisfise(x, dotty))\nforall x (Nonsocial(x) -> Unstrap(x, dotty))\n\nUnstrap(lev, claudina)\n\nUnstrap(lev, claudina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The jorry is casebook. The jorry is fateful. The jorry reclaim the bengt. The morissa does not eat the jorry. The morissa is not acaudal. The morissa deceive the jorry. The morissa reclaim the bengt. The bengt is casebook. The bengt does not see the morissa. The bengt reclaim the morissa. If something reclaim the bengt and the bengt is casebook then it deceive the bengt. If something is casebook then it reclaim the bengt. The jorry does not visit the morissa.", "logic": "\nCasebook(jorry)\nFateful(jorry)\nReclaim(jorry, bengt)\nnot Notice(morissa, jorry)\nnot Acaudal(morissa)\nDeceive(morissa, jorry)\nReclaim(morissa, bengt)\nCasebook(bengt)\nnot Deceive(bengt, morissa)\nReclaim(bengt, morissa)\nforall x (Reclaim(x, bengt) and Casebook(bengt) -> Deceive(x, bengt))\nforall x (Casebook(x) -> Reclaim(x, bengt))\n\nnot Reclaim(jorry, morissa)\n\nnot Reclaim(jorry, morissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "The breanne is aphetic. The breanne is unknowing. The breanne derestrict the dianna. The gunter does not eat the breanne. The gunter is not hangdog. The gunter despise the breanne. The gunter derestrict the dianna. The dianna is aphetic. The dianna does not see the gunter. The dianna derestrict the gunter. If something derestrict the dianna and the dianna is aphetic then it despise the dianna. If something is aphetic then it derestrict the dianna. The breanne is young.", "logic": "\nAphetic(breanne)\nUnknowing(breanne)\nDerestrict(breanne, dianna)\nnot Belabour(gunter, breanne)\nnot Hangdog(gunter)\nDespise(gunter, breanne)\nDerestrict(gunter, dianna)\nAphetic(dianna)\nnot Despise(dianna, gunter)\nDerestrict(dianna, gunter)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, dianna) and Aphetic(dianna) -> Despise(x, dianna))\nforall x (Aphetic(x) -> Derestrict(x, dianna))\n\nYoung(breanne)\n\nYoung(breanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1575"} {"premises": "Karola is lithesome. Karola is not beltlike. Seamus is menacing. Seamus is bogus. Margarete is orangish. Margarete is menacing. Margarete is bogus. If Karola is not beltlike then Karola is not unlabelled. If Karola is beltlike then Karola is not menacing. If something is bogus and unlabelled then it is not lithesome. If Seamus is bogus then Seamus is oaken. If something is lithesome and not unlabelled then it is not oaken. Rough things are oaken. Seamus is bogus.", "logic": "\nLithesome(karola)\nnot Beltlike(karola)\nMenacing(seamus)\nBogus(seamus)\nOrangish(margarete)\nMenacing(margarete)\nBogus(margarete)\nnot Beltlike(karola) -> not Unlabelled(karola)\nBeltlike(karola) -> not Menacing(karola)\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Unlabelled(x) -> not Lithesome(x))\nBogus(seamus) -> Oaken(seamus)\nforall x (Lithesome(x) and not Unlabelled(x) -> not Oaken(x))\nforall x (Beltlike(x) -> Oaken(x))\n\nBogus(seamus)\n\ntherefore Bogus(seamus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Gideon is dowerless. Gideon is not allargando. Kingsley is accessible. Kingsley is belgian. Maryann is upfront. Maryann is accessible. Maryann is belgian. If Gideon is not allargando then Gideon is not heartless. If Gideon is allargando then Gideon is not accessible. If something is belgian and heartless then it is not dowerless. If Kingsley is belgian then Kingsley is endovenous. If something is dowerless and not heartless then it is not endovenous. Rough things are endovenous. Kingsley is not belgian.", "logic": "\nDowerless(gideon)\nnot Allargando(gideon)\nAccessible(kingsley)\nBelgian(kingsley)\nUpfront(maryann)\nAccessible(maryann)\nBelgian(maryann)\nnot Allargando(gideon) -> not Heartless(gideon)\nAllargando(gideon) -> not Accessible(gideon)\nforall x (Belgian(x) and Heartless(x) -> not Dowerless(x))\nBelgian(kingsley) -> Endovenous(kingsley)\nforall x (Dowerless(x) and not Heartless(x) -> not Endovenous(x))\nforall x (Allargando(x) -> Endovenous(x))\n\nnot Belgian(kingsley)\n\ntherefore Belgian(kingsley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Dillon is seventh. Dillon is not effluent. Jarrett is drab. Jarrett is nodulose. Jen is fossilized. Jen is drab. Jen is nodulose. If Dillon is not effluent then Dillon is not insentient. If Dillon is effluent then Dillon is not drab. If something is nodulose and insentient then it is not seventh. If Jarrett is nodulose then Jarrett is untaxed. If something is seventh and not insentient then it is not untaxed. Rough things are untaxed. Jarrett is untaxed.", "logic": "\nSeventh(dillon)\nnot Effluent(dillon)\nDrab(jarrett)\nNodulose(jarrett)\nFossilized(jen)\nDrab(jen)\nNodulose(jen)\nnot Effluent(dillon) -> not Insentient(dillon)\nEffluent(dillon) -> not Drab(dillon)\nforall x (Nodulose(x) and Insentient(x) -> not Seventh(x))\nNodulose(jarrett) -> Untaxed(jarrett)\nforall x (Seventh(x) and not Insentient(x) -> not Untaxed(x))\nforall x (Effluent(x) -> Untaxed(x))\n\nUntaxed(jarrett)\n\nNodulose(jarrett) and Nodulose(jarrett) -> Untaxed(jarrett) -> therefore Untaxed(jarrett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Chrisy is nilotic. Chrisy is not unattended. Florence is gonzo. Florence is lumbar. Martelle is prostate. Martelle is gonzo. Martelle is lumbar. If Chrisy is not unattended then Chrisy is not endocrinal. If Chrisy is unattended then Chrisy is not gonzo. If something is lumbar and endocrinal then it is not nilotic. If Florence is lumbar then Florence is scrotal. If something is nilotic and not endocrinal then it is not scrotal. Rough things are scrotal. Chrisy is endocrinal.", "logic": "\nNilotic(chrisy)\nnot Unattended(chrisy)\nGonzo(florence)\nLumbar(florence)\nProstate(martelle)\nGonzo(martelle)\nLumbar(martelle)\nnot Unattended(chrisy) -> not Endocrinal(chrisy)\nUnattended(chrisy) -> not Gonzo(chrisy)\nforall x (Lumbar(x) and Endocrinal(x) -> not Nilotic(x))\nLumbar(florence) -> Scrotal(florence)\nforall x (Nilotic(x) and not Endocrinal(x) -> not Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Unattended(x) -> Scrotal(x))\n\nEndocrinal(chrisy)\n\nnot Unattended(chrisy) and not Unattended(chrisy) -> not Endocrinal(chrisy) -> therefore not Endocrinal(chrisy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Timothee is tenfold. Timothee is not satiated. Shirl is multilevel. Shirl is trilobed. Harlan is morbid. Harlan is multilevel. Harlan is trilobed. If Timothee is not satiated then Timothee is not indelicate. If Timothee is satiated then Timothee is not multilevel. If something is trilobed and indelicate then it is not tenfold. If Shirl is trilobed then Shirl is impellent. If something is tenfold and not indelicate then it is not impellent. Rough things are impellent. Timothee is not impellent.", "logic": "\nTenfold(timothee)\nnot Satiated(timothee)\nMultilevel(shirl)\nTrilobed(shirl)\nMorbid(harlan)\nMultilevel(harlan)\nTrilobed(harlan)\nnot Satiated(timothee) -> not Indelicate(timothee)\nSatiated(timothee) -> not Multilevel(timothee)\nforall x (Trilobed(x) and Indelicate(x) -> not Tenfold(x))\nTrilobed(shirl) -> Impellent(shirl)\nforall x (Tenfold(x) and not Indelicate(x) -> not Impellent(x))\nforall x (Satiated(x) -> Impellent(x))\n\nnot Impellent(timothee)\n\nnot Satiated(timothee) and not Satiated(timothee) -> not Indelicate(timothee) -> therefore not Indelicate(timothee) Tenfold(timothee) and not Indelicate(timothee) and forall x (Tenfold(x) and not Indelicate(x) -> not Impellent(x)) -> therefore not Impellent(timothee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Chelsey is batty. Chelsey is not bulbaceous. Rodolphe is roughhewn. Rodolphe is detractive. Tiebold is suboceanic. Tiebold is roughhewn. Tiebold is detractive. If Chelsey is not bulbaceous then Chelsey is not granted. If Chelsey is bulbaceous then Chelsey is not roughhewn. If something is detractive and granted then it is not batty. If Rodolphe is detractive then Rodolphe is devoted. If something is batty and not granted then it is not devoted. Rough things are devoted. Chelsey is devoted.", "logic": "\nBatty(chelsey)\nnot Bulbaceous(chelsey)\nRoughhewn(rodolphe)\nDetractive(rodolphe)\nSuboceanic(tiebold)\nRoughhewn(tiebold)\nDetractive(tiebold)\nnot Bulbaceous(chelsey) -> not Granted(chelsey)\nBulbaceous(chelsey) -> not Roughhewn(chelsey)\nforall x (Detractive(x) and Granted(x) -> not Batty(x))\nDetractive(rodolphe) -> Devoted(rodolphe)\nforall x (Batty(x) and not Granted(x) -> not Devoted(x))\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Devoted(x))\n\nDevoted(chelsey)\n\nnot Bulbaceous(chelsey) and not Bulbaceous(chelsey) -> not Granted(chelsey) -> therefore not Granted(chelsey) Batty(chelsey) and not Granted(chelsey) and forall x (Batty(x) and not Granted(x) -> not Devoted(x)) -> therefore not Devoted(chelsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Hyacinth is hangdog. Hyacinth is not heedful. Melita is fettered. Melita is citywide. Enrica is nonviolent. Enrica is fettered. Enrica is citywide. If Hyacinth is not heedful then Hyacinth is not bone. If Hyacinth is heedful then Hyacinth is not fettered. If something is citywide and bone then it is not hangdog. If Melita is citywide then Melita is ventral. If something is hangdog and not bone then it is not ventral. Rough things are ventral. Enrica is not ventral.", "logic": "\nHangdog(hyacinth)\nnot Heedful(hyacinth)\nFettered(melita)\nCitywide(melita)\nNonviolent(enrica)\nFettered(enrica)\nCitywide(enrica)\nnot Heedful(hyacinth) -> not Bone(hyacinth)\nHeedful(hyacinth) -> not Fettered(hyacinth)\nforall x (Citywide(x) and Bone(x) -> not Hangdog(x))\nCitywide(melita) -> Ventral(melita)\nforall x (Hangdog(x) and not Bone(x) -> not Ventral(x))\nforall x (Heedful(x) -> Ventral(x))\n\nnot Ventral(enrica)\n\nforall x (Heedful(x) -> Ventral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Ginnifer is bulky. Ginnifer is not welcome. Chas is taoist. Chas is catapultic. Cristin is milklike. Cristin is taoist. Cristin is catapultic. If Ginnifer is not welcome then Ginnifer is not totipotent. If Ginnifer is welcome then Ginnifer is not taoist. If something is catapultic and totipotent then it is not bulky. If Chas is catapultic then Chas is ictic. If something is bulky and not totipotent then it is not ictic. Rough things are ictic. Ginnifer is taoist.", "logic": "\nBulky(ginnifer)\nnot Welcome(ginnifer)\nTaoist(chas)\nCatapultic(chas)\nMilklike(cristin)\nTaoist(cristin)\nCatapultic(cristin)\nnot Welcome(ginnifer) -> not Totipotent(ginnifer)\nWelcome(ginnifer) -> not Taoist(ginnifer)\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Totipotent(x) -> not Bulky(x))\nCatapultic(chas) -> Ictic(chas)\nforall x (Bulky(x) and not Totipotent(x) -> not Ictic(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x) -> Ictic(x))\n\nTaoist(ginnifer)\n\nTaoist(ginnifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Bradley is thundery. Bradley is not stellar. Hayes is asymmetric. Hayes is unpromised. Pennie is perplexed. Pennie is asymmetric. Pennie is unpromised. If Bradley is not stellar then Bradley is not gentle. If Bradley is stellar then Bradley is not asymmetric. If something is unpromised and gentle then it is not thundery. If Hayes is unpromised then Hayes is cockamamie. If something is thundery and not gentle then it is not cockamamie. Rough things are cockamamie. Pennie is not thundery.", "logic": "\nThundery(bradley)\nnot Stellar(bradley)\nAsymmetric(hayes)\nUnpromised(hayes)\nPerplexed(pennie)\nAsymmetric(pennie)\nUnpromised(pennie)\nnot Stellar(bradley) -> not Gentle(bradley)\nStellar(bradley) -> not Asymmetric(bradley)\nforall x (Unpromised(x) and Gentle(x) -> not Thundery(x))\nUnpromised(hayes) -> Cockamamie(hayes)\nforall x (Thundery(x) and not Gentle(x) -> not Cockamamie(x))\nforall x (Stellar(x) -> Cockamamie(x))\n\nnot Thundery(pennie)\n\nnot Thundery(pennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Pembroke is affixal. Pembroke is not splenic. Rae is cheliceral. Rae is unarguable. Verina is evacuant. Verina is cheliceral. Verina is unarguable. If Pembroke is not splenic then Pembroke is not mechanised. If Pembroke is splenic then Pembroke is not cheliceral. If something is unarguable and mechanised then it is not affixal. If Rae is unarguable then Rae is diminuendo. If something is affixal and not mechanised then it is not diminuendo. Rough things are diminuendo. Verina is splenic.", "logic": "\nAffixal(pembroke)\nnot Splenic(pembroke)\nCheliceral(rae)\nUnarguable(rae)\nEvacuant(verina)\nCheliceral(verina)\nUnarguable(verina)\nnot Splenic(pembroke) -> not Mechanised(pembroke)\nSplenic(pembroke) -> not Cheliceral(pembroke)\nforall x (Unarguable(x) and Mechanised(x) -> not Affixal(x))\nUnarguable(rae) -> Diminuendo(rae)\nforall x (Affixal(x) and not Mechanised(x) -> not Diminuendo(x))\nforall x (Splenic(x) -> Diminuendo(x))\n\nSplenic(verina)\n\nSplenic(verina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Ruthi is ciliated. Ruthi is not incoherent. Jolyn is stoppered. Jolyn is shouldered. Mikey is diploid. Mikey is stoppered. Mikey is shouldered. If Ruthi is not incoherent then Ruthi is not indefinite. If Ruthi is incoherent then Ruthi is not stoppered. If something is shouldered and indefinite then it is not ciliated. If Jolyn is shouldered then Jolyn is anaerobic. If something is ciliated and not indefinite then it is not anaerobic. Rough things are anaerobic. Jolyn is not indefinite.", "logic": "\nCiliated(ruthi)\nnot Incoherent(ruthi)\nStoppered(jolyn)\nShouldered(jolyn)\nDiploid(mikey)\nStoppered(mikey)\nShouldered(mikey)\nnot Incoherent(ruthi) -> not Indefinite(ruthi)\nIncoherent(ruthi) -> not Stoppered(ruthi)\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Indefinite(x) -> not Ciliated(x))\nShouldered(jolyn) -> Anaerobic(jolyn)\nforall x (Ciliated(x) and not Indefinite(x) -> not Anaerobic(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) -> Anaerobic(x))\n\nnot Indefinite(jolyn)\n\nnot Indefinite(jolyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "Chaddy is greatest. Chaddy is not postexilic. Ferdy is khaki. Ferdy is semiotic. Janis is playable. Janis is khaki. Janis is semiotic. If Chaddy is not postexilic then Chaddy is not splendid. If Chaddy is postexilic then Chaddy is not khaki. If something is semiotic and splendid then it is not greatest. If Ferdy is semiotic then Ferdy is impossible. If something is greatest and not splendid then it is not impossible. Rough things are impossible. Ferdy is playable.", "logic": "\nGreatest(chaddy)\nnot Postexilic(chaddy)\nKhaki(ferdy)\nSemiotic(ferdy)\nPlayable(janis)\nKhaki(janis)\nSemiotic(janis)\nnot Postexilic(chaddy) -> not Splendid(chaddy)\nPostexilic(chaddy) -> not Khaki(chaddy)\nforall x (Semiotic(x) and Splendid(x) -> not Greatest(x))\nSemiotic(ferdy) -> Impossible(ferdy)\nforall x (Greatest(x) and not Splendid(x) -> not Impossible(x))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) -> Impossible(x))\n\nPlayable(ferdy)\n\nPlayable(ferdy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2206"} {"premises": "The camilla cheat the dawn. The camilla cheat the magdalena. The camilla is blear. The camilla waver the emelia. The emelia is not unprovoked. The emelia waver the magdalena. The dawn exorcise the camilla. The dawn exorcise the emelia. The magdalena waver the dawn. The magdalena exorcise the camilla. If someone exorcise the emelia then they eat the camilla. If someone exorcise the camilla then the camilla cheat the magdalena. If someone cheat the camilla then they are not unprovoked. The camilla is blear.", "logic": "\nCheat(camilla, dawn)\nCheat(camilla, magdalena)\nBlear(camilla)\nWaver(camilla, emelia)\nnot Unprovoked(emelia)\nWaver(emelia, magdalena)\nExorcise(dawn, camilla)\nExorcise(dawn, emelia)\nWaver(magdalena, dawn)\nExorcise(magdalena, camilla)\nforall x (Exorcise(x, emelia) -> Cheat(x, camilla))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, camilla) -> Cheat(camilla, magdalena))\nforall x (Cheat(x, camilla) -> not Unprovoked(x))\n\nBlear(camilla)\n\ntherefore Blear(camilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The barbe groin the angelia. The barbe groin the dorey. The barbe is wearied. The barbe defray the chevalier. The chevalier is not sunless. The chevalier defray the dorey. The angelia tangle the barbe. The angelia tangle the chevalier. The dorey defray the angelia. The dorey tangle the barbe. If someone tangle the chevalier then they eat the barbe. If someone tangle the barbe then the barbe groin the dorey. If someone groin the barbe then they are not sunless. The barbe does not eat the angelia.", "logic": "\nGroin(barbe, angelia)\nGroin(barbe, dorey)\nWearied(barbe)\nDefray(barbe, chevalier)\nnot Sunless(chevalier)\nDefray(chevalier, dorey)\nTangle(angelia, barbe)\nTangle(angelia, chevalier)\nDefray(dorey, angelia)\nTangle(dorey, barbe)\nforall x (Tangle(x, chevalier) -> Groin(x, barbe))\nforall x (Tangle(x, barbe) -> Groin(barbe, dorey))\nforall x (Groin(x, barbe) -> not Sunless(x))\n\nnot Groin(barbe, angelia)\n\ntherefore Groin(barbe, angelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The eryn scrap the josefina. The eryn scrap the victoria. The eryn is virginal. The eryn disenable the tarrant. The tarrant is not mindless. The tarrant disenable the victoria. The josefina soap the eryn. The josefina soap the tarrant. The victoria disenable the josefina. The victoria soap the eryn. If someone soap the tarrant then they eat the eryn. If someone soap the eryn then the eryn scrap the victoria. If someone scrap the eryn then they are not mindless. The josefina scrap the eryn.", "logic": "\nScrap(eryn, josefina)\nScrap(eryn, victoria)\nVirginal(eryn)\nDisenable(eryn, tarrant)\nnot Mindless(tarrant)\nDisenable(tarrant, victoria)\nSoap(josefina, eryn)\nSoap(josefina, tarrant)\nDisenable(victoria, josefina)\nSoap(victoria, eryn)\nforall x (Soap(x, tarrant) -> Scrap(x, eryn))\nforall x (Soap(x, eryn) -> Scrap(eryn, victoria))\nforall x (Scrap(x, eryn) -> not Mindless(x))\n\nScrap(josefina, eryn)\n\nSoap(josefina, tarrant) and forall x (Soap(x, tarrant) -> Scrap(x, eryn)) -> therefore Scrap(josefina, eryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The parrnell dither the archy. The parrnell dither the kelley. The parrnell is banal. The parrnell spondaize the moira. The moira is not cernuous. The moira spondaize the kelley. The archy elate the parrnell. The archy elate the moira. The kelley spondaize the archy. The kelley elate the parrnell. If someone elate the moira then they eat the parrnell. If someone elate the parrnell then the parrnell dither the kelley. If someone dither the parrnell then they are not cernuous. The archy does not eat the parrnell.", "logic": "\nDither(parrnell, archy)\nDither(parrnell, kelley)\nBanal(parrnell)\nSpondaize(parrnell, moira)\nnot Cernuous(moira)\nSpondaize(moira, kelley)\nElate(archy, parrnell)\nElate(archy, moira)\nSpondaize(kelley, archy)\nElate(kelley, parrnell)\nforall x (Elate(x, moira) -> Dither(x, parrnell))\nforall x (Elate(x, parrnell) -> Dither(parrnell, kelley))\nforall x (Dither(x, parrnell) -> not Cernuous(x))\n\nnot Dither(archy, parrnell)\n\nElate(archy, moira) and forall x (Elate(x, moira) -> Dither(x, parrnell)) -> therefore Dither(archy, parrnell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The miguela snarf the homer. The miguela snarf the shelbi. The miguela is superior. The miguela shoal the meriel. The meriel is not crannied. The meriel shoal the shelbi. The homer worry the miguela. The homer worry the meriel. The shelbi shoal the homer. The shelbi worry the miguela. If someone worry the meriel then they eat the miguela. If someone worry the miguela then the miguela snarf the shelbi. If someone snarf the miguela then they are not crannied. The homer is not crannied.", "logic": "\nSnarf(miguela, homer)\nSnarf(miguela, shelbi)\nSuperior(miguela)\nShoal(miguela, meriel)\nnot Crannied(meriel)\nShoal(meriel, shelbi)\nWorry(homer, miguela)\nWorry(homer, meriel)\nShoal(shelbi, homer)\nWorry(shelbi, miguela)\nforall x (Worry(x, meriel) -> Snarf(x, miguela))\nforall x (Worry(x, miguela) -> Snarf(miguela, shelbi))\nforall x (Snarf(x, miguela) -> not Crannied(x))\n\nnot Crannied(homer)\n\nWorry(homer, meriel) and forall x (Worry(x, meriel) -> Snarf(x, miguela)) -> therefore Snarf(homer, miguela) Snarf(homer, miguela) and forall x (Snarf(x, miguela) -> not Crannied(x)) -> therefore not Crannied(homer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The winston opacify the rianon. The winston opacify the bernita. The winston is weakening. The winston subserve the stan. The stan is not rustless. The stan subserve the bernita. The rianon beleaguer the winston. The rianon beleaguer the stan. The bernita subserve the rianon. The bernita beleaguer the winston. If someone beleaguer the stan then they eat the winston. If someone beleaguer the winston then the winston opacify the bernita. If someone opacify the winston then they are not rustless. The rianon is rustless.", "logic": "\nOpacify(winston, rianon)\nOpacify(winston, bernita)\nWeakening(winston)\nSubserve(winston, stan)\nnot Rustless(stan)\nSubserve(stan, bernita)\nBeleaguer(rianon, winston)\nBeleaguer(rianon, stan)\nSubserve(bernita, rianon)\nBeleaguer(bernita, winston)\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, stan) -> Opacify(x, winston))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, winston) -> Opacify(winston, bernita))\nforall x (Opacify(x, winston) -> not Rustless(x))\n\nRustless(rianon)\n\nBeleaguer(rianon, stan) and forall x (Beleaguer(x, stan) -> Opacify(x, winston)) -> therefore Opacify(rianon, winston) Opacify(rianon, winston) and forall x (Opacify(x, winston) -> not Rustless(x)) -> therefore not Rustless(rianon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The tessi disquiet the ondrea. The tessi disquiet the marta. The tessi is cuneiform. The tessi solve the nada. The nada is not laudatory. The nada solve the marta. The ondrea seine the tessi. The ondrea seine the nada. The marta solve the ondrea. The marta seine the tessi. If someone seine the nada then they eat the tessi. If someone seine the tessi then the tessi disquiet the marta. If someone disquiet the tessi then they are not laudatory. The marta does not eat the tessi.", "logic": "\nDisquiet(tessi, ondrea)\nDisquiet(tessi, marta)\nCuneiform(tessi)\nSolve(tessi, nada)\nnot Laudatory(nada)\nSolve(nada, marta)\nSeine(ondrea, tessi)\nSeine(ondrea, nada)\nSolve(marta, ondrea)\nSeine(marta, tessi)\nforall x (Seine(x, nada) -> Disquiet(x, tessi))\nforall x (Seine(x, tessi) -> Disquiet(tessi, marta))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, tessi) -> not Laudatory(x))\n\nnot Disquiet(marta, tessi)\n\nforall x (Seine(x, nada) -> Disquiet(x, tessi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The roxie steer the trevar. The roxie steer the blondy. The roxie is european. The roxie desire the lorri. The lorri is not wormy. The lorri desire the blondy. The trevar object the roxie. The trevar object the lorri. The blondy desire the trevar. The blondy object the roxie. If someone object the lorri then they eat the roxie. If someone object the roxie then the roxie steer the blondy. If someone steer the roxie then they are not wormy. The lorri steer the roxie.", "logic": "\nSteer(roxie, trevar)\nSteer(roxie, blondy)\nEuropean(roxie)\nDesire(roxie, lorri)\nnot Wormy(lorri)\nDesire(lorri, blondy)\nObject(trevar, roxie)\nObject(trevar, lorri)\nDesire(blondy, trevar)\nObject(blondy, roxie)\nforall x (Object(x, lorri) -> Steer(x, roxie))\nforall x (Object(x, roxie) -> Steer(roxie, blondy))\nforall x (Steer(x, roxie) -> not Wormy(x))\n\nSteer(lorri, roxie)\n\nforall x (Object(x, lorri) -> Steer(x, roxie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The georgine roar the millisent. The georgine roar the lyndsay. The georgine is unshaven. The georgine bless the dianne. The dianne is not gruelling. The dianne bless the lyndsay. The millisent infect the georgine. The millisent infect the dianne. The lyndsay bless the millisent. The lyndsay infect the georgine. If someone infect the dianne then they eat the georgine. If someone infect the georgine then the georgine roar the lyndsay. If someone roar the georgine then they are not gruelling. The georgine does not eat the georgine.", "logic": "\nRoar(georgine, millisent)\nRoar(georgine, lyndsay)\nUnshaven(georgine)\nBless(georgine, dianne)\nnot Gruelling(dianne)\nBless(dianne, lyndsay)\nInfect(millisent, georgine)\nInfect(millisent, dianne)\nBless(lyndsay, millisent)\nInfect(lyndsay, georgine)\nforall x (Infect(x, dianne) -> Roar(x, georgine))\nforall x (Infect(x, georgine) -> Roar(georgine, lyndsay))\nforall x (Roar(x, georgine) -> not Gruelling(x))\n\nnot Roar(georgine, georgine)\n\nforall x (Infect(x, dianne) -> Roar(x, georgine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The freddie unspell the tess. The freddie unspell the bonny. The freddie is beaten. The freddie shoal the anatollo. The anatollo is not beetle. The anatollo shoal the bonny. The tess reticulate the freddie. The tess reticulate the anatollo. The bonny shoal the tess. The bonny reticulate the freddie. If someone reticulate the anatollo then they eat the freddie. If someone reticulate the freddie then the freddie unspell the bonny. If someone unspell the freddie then they are not beetle. The anatollo is nice.", "logic": "\nUnspell(freddie, tess)\nUnspell(freddie, bonny)\nBeaten(freddie)\nShoal(freddie, anatollo)\nnot Beetle(anatollo)\nShoal(anatollo, bonny)\nReticulate(tess, freddie)\nReticulate(tess, anatollo)\nShoal(bonny, tess)\nReticulate(bonny, freddie)\nforall x (Reticulate(x, anatollo) -> Unspell(x, freddie))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, freddie) -> Unspell(freddie, bonny))\nforall x (Unspell(x, freddie) -> not Beetle(x))\n\nNice(anatollo)\n\nNice(anatollo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The fayre drain the kendall. The fayre drain the melloney. The fayre is zoophagous. The fayre talc the ethel. The ethel is not ambulatory. The ethel talc the melloney. The kendall spell the fayre. The kendall spell the ethel. The melloney talc the kendall. The melloney spell the fayre. If someone spell the ethel then they eat the fayre. If someone spell the fayre then the fayre drain the melloney. If someone drain the fayre then they are not ambulatory. The melloney does not eat the ethel.", "logic": "\nDrain(fayre, kendall)\nDrain(fayre, melloney)\nZoophagous(fayre)\nTalc(fayre, ethel)\nnot Ambulatory(ethel)\nTalc(ethel, melloney)\nSpell(kendall, fayre)\nSpell(kendall, ethel)\nTalc(melloney, kendall)\nSpell(melloney, fayre)\nforall x (Spell(x, ethel) -> Drain(x, fayre))\nforall x (Spell(x, fayre) -> Drain(fayre, melloney))\nforall x (Drain(x, fayre) -> not Ambulatory(x))\n\nnot Drain(melloney, ethel)\n\nnot Drain(melloney, ethel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The colene scrimmage the natalya. The colene scrimmage the janus. The colene is obligatory. The colene declaw the whittaker. The whittaker is not aspectual. The whittaker declaw the janus. The natalya desalinate the colene. The natalya desalinate the whittaker. The janus declaw the natalya. The janus desalinate the colene. If someone desalinate the whittaker then they eat the colene. If someone desalinate the colene then the colene scrimmage the janus. If someone scrimmage the colene then they are not aspectual. The janus is obligatory.", "logic": "\nScrimmage(colene, natalya)\nScrimmage(colene, janus)\nObligatory(colene)\nDeclaw(colene, whittaker)\nnot Aspectual(whittaker)\nDeclaw(whittaker, janus)\nDesalinate(natalya, colene)\nDesalinate(natalya, whittaker)\nDeclaw(janus, natalya)\nDesalinate(janus, colene)\nforall x (Desalinate(x, whittaker) -> Scrimmage(x, colene))\nforall x (Desalinate(x, colene) -> Scrimmage(colene, janus))\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, colene) -> not Aspectual(x))\n\nObligatory(janus)\n\nObligatory(janus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1622"} {"premises": "The verine is calycinal. The verine is vitrified. The verine is yankee. The verine is not refined. The verine is cislunar. The verine plagiarize the myrna. The verine does not see the myrna. The verine moisten the myrna. The myrna is calycinal. The myrna is vitrified. The myrna is yankee. The myrna is refined. The myrna is cislunar. The myrna does not like the verine. The myrna does not see the verine. The myrna moisten the verine. If something is calycinal then it plagiarize the myrna. If something is refined and it plagiarize the myrna then it budget the myrna. The verine is cislunar.", "logic": "\nCalycinal(verine)\nVitrified(verine)\nYankee(verine)\nnot Refined(verine)\nCislunar(verine)\nPlagiarize(verine, myrna)\nnot Budget(verine, myrna)\nMoisten(verine, myrna)\nCalycinal(myrna)\nVitrified(myrna)\nYankee(myrna)\nRefined(myrna)\nCislunar(myrna)\nnot Plagiarize(myrna, verine)\nnot Budget(myrna, verine)\nMoisten(myrna, verine)\nforall x (Calycinal(x) -> Plagiarize(x, myrna))\nforall x (Refined(x) and Plagiarize(x, myrna) -> Budget(x, myrna))\n\nCislunar(verine)\n\ntherefore Cislunar(verine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The berchtold is protozoic. The berchtold is amharic. The berchtold is cellulosid. The berchtold is not blasted. The berchtold is original. The berchtold optimise the benedict. The berchtold does not see the benedict. The berchtold flourish the benedict. The benedict is protozoic. The benedict is amharic. The benedict is cellulosid. The benedict is blasted. The benedict is original. The benedict does not like the berchtold. The benedict does not see the berchtold. The benedict flourish the berchtold. If something is protozoic then it optimise the benedict. If something is blasted and it optimise the benedict then it lessen the benedict. The berchtold is blasted.", "logic": "\nProtozoic(berchtold)\nAmharic(berchtold)\nCellulosid(berchtold)\nnot Blasted(berchtold)\nOriginal(berchtold)\nOptimise(berchtold, benedict)\nnot Lessen(berchtold, benedict)\nFlourish(berchtold, benedict)\nProtozoic(benedict)\nAmharic(benedict)\nCellulosid(benedict)\nBlasted(benedict)\nOriginal(benedict)\nnot Optimise(benedict, berchtold)\nnot Lessen(benedict, berchtold)\nFlourish(benedict, berchtold)\nforall x (Protozoic(x) -> Optimise(x, benedict))\nforall x (Blasted(x) and Optimise(x, benedict) -> Lessen(x, benedict))\n\nBlasted(berchtold)\n\ntherefore not Blasted(berchtold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The faythe is iridaceous. The faythe is senseless. The faythe is foetal. The faythe is not unfilled. The faythe is malawian. The faythe plonk the marlee. The faythe does not see the marlee. The faythe discontent the marlee. The marlee is iridaceous. The marlee is senseless. The marlee is foetal. The marlee is unfilled. The marlee is malawian. The marlee does not like the faythe. The marlee does not see the faythe. The marlee discontent the faythe. If something is iridaceous then it plonk the marlee. If something is unfilled and it plonk the marlee then it ulcerate the marlee. The marlee plonk the marlee.", "logic": "\nIridaceous(faythe)\nSenseless(faythe)\nFoetal(faythe)\nnot Unfilled(faythe)\nMalawian(faythe)\nPlonk(faythe, marlee)\nnot Ulcerate(faythe, marlee)\nDiscontent(faythe, marlee)\nIridaceous(marlee)\nSenseless(marlee)\nFoetal(marlee)\nUnfilled(marlee)\nMalawian(marlee)\nnot Plonk(marlee, faythe)\nnot Ulcerate(marlee, faythe)\nDiscontent(marlee, faythe)\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Plonk(x, marlee))\nforall x (Unfilled(x) and Plonk(x, marlee) -> Ulcerate(x, marlee))\n\nPlonk(marlee, marlee)\n\nIridaceous(marlee) and forall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Plonk(x, marlee)) -> therefore Plonk(marlee, marlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The ikey is umteenth. The ikey is heterodox. The ikey is watertight. The ikey is not adonic. The ikey is mutational. The ikey kick the janenna. The ikey does not see the janenna. The ikey eulogise the janenna. The janenna is umteenth. The janenna is heterodox. The janenna is watertight. The janenna is adonic. The janenna is mutational. The janenna does not like the ikey. The janenna does not see the ikey. The janenna eulogise the ikey. If something is umteenth then it kick the janenna. If something is adonic and it kick the janenna then it drip the janenna. The janenna does not like the janenna.", "logic": "\nUmteenth(ikey)\nHeterodox(ikey)\nWatertight(ikey)\nnot Adonic(ikey)\nMutational(ikey)\nKick(ikey, janenna)\nnot Drip(ikey, janenna)\nEulogise(ikey, janenna)\nUmteenth(janenna)\nHeterodox(janenna)\nWatertight(janenna)\nAdonic(janenna)\nMutational(janenna)\nnot Kick(janenna, ikey)\nnot Drip(janenna, ikey)\nEulogise(janenna, ikey)\nforall x (Umteenth(x) -> Kick(x, janenna))\nforall x (Adonic(x) and Kick(x, janenna) -> Drip(x, janenna))\n\nnot Kick(janenna, janenna)\n\nUmteenth(janenna) and forall x (Umteenth(x) -> Kick(x, janenna)) -> therefore Kick(janenna, janenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The jenifer is opthalmic. The jenifer is peppy. The jenifer is crescendo. The jenifer is not rarefied. The jenifer is rotated. The jenifer gash the gavin. The jenifer does not see the gavin. The jenifer scotch the gavin. The gavin is opthalmic. The gavin is peppy. The gavin is crescendo. The gavin is rarefied. The gavin is rotated. The gavin does not like the jenifer. The gavin does not see the jenifer. The gavin scotch the jenifer. If something is opthalmic then it gash the gavin. If something is rarefied and it gash the gavin then it satirize the gavin. The gavin satirize the gavin.", "logic": "\nOpthalmic(jenifer)\nPeppy(jenifer)\nCrescendo(jenifer)\nnot Rarefied(jenifer)\nRotated(jenifer)\nGash(jenifer, gavin)\nnot Satirize(jenifer, gavin)\nScotch(jenifer, gavin)\nOpthalmic(gavin)\nPeppy(gavin)\nCrescendo(gavin)\nRarefied(gavin)\nRotated(gavin)\nnot Gash(gavin, jenifer)\nnot Satirize(gavin, jenifer)\nScotch(gavin, jenifer)\nforall x (Opthalmic(x) -> Gash(x, gavin))\nforall x (Rarefied(x) and Gash(x, gavin) -> Satirize(x, gavin))\n\nSatirize(gavin, gavin)\n\nOpthalmic(gavin) and forall x (Opthalmic(x) -> Gash(x, gavin)) -> therefore Gash(gavin, gavin) Rarefied(gavin) and Gash(gavin, gavin) and forall x (Rarefied(x) and Gash(x, gavin) -> Satirize(x, gavin)) -> therefore Satirize(gavin, gavin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The kiele is looted. The kiele is incan. The kiele is ostensive. The kiele is not genetical. The kiele is astonied. The kiele eclipse the scottie. The kiele does not see the scottie. The kiele spirt the scottie. The scottie is looted. The scottie is incan. The scottie is ostensive. The scottie is genetical. The scottie is astonied. The scottie does not like the kiele. The scottie does not see the kiele. The scottie spirt the kiele. If something is looted then it eclipse the scottie. If something is genetical and it eclipse the scottie then it depute the scottie. The scottie does not see the scottie.", "logic": "\nLooted(kiele)\nIncan(kiele)\nOstensive(kiele)\nnot Genetical(kiele)\nAstonied(kiele)\nEclipse(kiele, scottie)\nnot Depute(kiele, scottie)\nSpirt(kiele, scottie)\nLooted(scottie)\nIncan(scottie)\nOstensive(scottie)\nGenetical(scottie)\nAstonied(scottie)\nnot Eclipse(scottie, kiele)\nnot Depute(scottie, kiele)\nSpirt(scottie, kiele)\nforall x (Looted(x) -> Eclipse(x, scottie))\nforall x (Genetical(x) and Eclipse(x, scottie) -> Depute(x, scottie))\n\nnot Depute(scottie, scottie)\n\nLooted(scottie) and forall x (Looted(x) -> Eclipse(x, scottie)) -> therefore Eclipse(scottie, scottie) Genetical(scottie) and Eclipse(scottie, scottie) and forall x (Genetical(x) and Eclipse(x, scottie) -> Depute(x, scottie)) -> therefore Depute(scottie, scottie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The christel is splitting. The christel is frequent. The christel is understood. The christel is not drizzly. The christel is germy. The christel bespeckle the gwyn. The christel does not see the gwyn. The christel jack the gwyn. The gwyn is splitting. The gwyn is frequent. The gwyn is understood. The gwyn is drizzly. The gwyn is germy. The gwyn does not like the christel. The gwyn does not see the christel. The gwyn jack the christel. If something is splitting then it bespeckle the gwyn. If something is drizzly and it bespeckle the gwyn then it uncork the gwyn. The christel does not visit the christel.", "logic": "\nSplitting(christel)\nFrequent(christel)\nUnderstood(christel)\nnot Drizzly(christel)\nGermy(christel)\nBespeckle(christel, gwyn)\nnot Uncork(christel, gwyn)\nJack(christel, gwyn)\nSplitting(gwyn)\nFrequent(gwyn)\nUnderstood(gwyn)\nDrizzly(gwyn)\nGermy(gwyn)\nnot Bespeckle(gwyn, christel)\nnot Uncork(gwyn, christel)\nJack(gwyn, christel)\nforall x (Splitting(x) -> Bespeckle(x, gwyn))\nforall x (Drizzly(x) and Bespeckle(x, gwyn) -> Uncork(x, gwyn))\n\nnot Jack(christel, christel)\n\nnot Jack(christel, christel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The marcel is onstage. The marcel is polyploid. The marcel is nonfatal. The marcel is not whiney. The marcel is wounded. The marcel channelize the cory. The marcel does not see the cory. The marcel grubstake the cory. The cory is onstage. The cory is polyploid. The cory is nonfatal. The cory is whiney. The cory is wounded. The cory does not like the marcel. The cory does not see the marcel. The cory grubstake the marcel. If something is onstage then it channelize the cory. If something is whiney and it channelize the cory then it symbolise the cory. The cory grubstake the cory.", "logic": "\nOnstage(marcel)\nPolyploid(marcel)\nNonfatal(marcel)\nnot Whiney(marcel)\nWounded(marcel)\nChannelize(marcel, cory)\nnot Symbolise(marcel, cory)\nGrubstake(marcel, cory)\nOnstage(cory)\nPolyploid(cory)\nNonfatal(cory)\nWhiney(cory)\nWounded(cory)\nnot Channelize(cory, marcel)\nnot Symbolise(cory, marcel)\nGrubstake(cory, marcel)\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Channelize(x, cory))\nforall x (Whiney(x) and Channelize(x, cory) -> Symbolise(x, cory))\n\nGrubstake(cory, cory)\n\nGrubstake(cory, cory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The sile is breathed. The sile is folding. The sile is effortful. The sile is not tenacious. The sile is romany. The sile quadruple the cassey. The sile does not see the cassey. The sile license the cassey. The cassey is breathed. The cassey is folding. The cassey is effortful. The cassey is tenacious. The cassey is romany. The cassey does not like the sile. The cassey does not see the sile. The cassey license the sile. If something is breathed then it quadruple the cassey. If something is tenacious and it quadruple the cassey then it dispread the cassey. The sile does not see the sile.", "logic": "\nBreathed(sile)\nFolding(sile)\nEffortful(sile)\nnot Tenacious(sile)\nRomany(sile)\nQuadruple(sile, cassey)\nnot Dispread(sile, cassey)\nLicense(sile, cassey)\nBreathed(cassey)\nFolding(cassey)\nEffortful(cassey)\nTenacious(cassey)\nRomany(cassey)\nnot Quadruple(cassey, sile)\nnot Dispread(cassey, sile)\nLicense(cassey, sile)\nforall x (Breathed(x) -> Quadruple(x, cassey))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) and Quadruple(x, cassey) -> Dispread(x, cassey))\n\nnot Dispread(sile, sile)\n\nnot Dispread(sile, sile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "The rochella is blanketed. The rochella is snappish. The rochella is didactic. The rochella is not mendacious. The rochella is intoned. The rochella bend the ellynn. The rochella does not see the ellynn. The rochella humour the ellynn. The ellynn is blanketed. The ellynn is snappish. The ellynn is didactic. The ellynn is mendacious. The ellynn is intoned. The ellynn does not like the rochella. The ellynn does not see the rochella. The ellynn humour the rochella. If something is blanketed then it bend the ellynn. If something is mendacious and it bend the ellynn then it bring the ellynn. The rochella bend the rochella.", "logic": "\nBlanketed(rochella)\nSnappish(rochella)\nDidactic(rochella)\nnot Mendacious(rochella)\nIntoned(rochella)\nBend(rochella, ellynn)\nnot Bring(rochella, ellynn)\nHumour(rochella, ellynn)\nBlanketed(ellynn)\nSnappish(ellynn)\nDidactic(ellynn)\nMendacious(ellynn)\nIntoned(ellynn)\nnot Bend(ellynn, rochella)\nnot Bring(ellynn, rochella)\nHumour(ellynn, rochella)\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> Bend(x, ellynn))\nforall x (Mendacious(x) and Bend(x, ellynn) -> Bring(x, ellynn))\n\nBend(rochella, rochella)\n\nBend(rochella, rochella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-573"} {"premises": "Henrieta is duplicate. Henrieta is fumbling. Henrieta is unloving. Danika is neuronic. Danika is duplicate. Danika is fumbling. Danika is ongoing. Danika is safe. Danika is unloving. Danika is poetic. Gilbert is duplicate. Gilbert is fumbling. Gilbert is ongoing. Gilbert is safe. Gilbert is unloving. Gilbert is poetic. All fumbling, duplicate people are neuronic. All neuronic people are ongoing. If Gilbert is fumbling then Gilbert is neuronic. If someone is unloving and fumbling then they are duplicate. If Danika is duplicate then Danika is safe. Nice, ongoing people are unloving. Gilbert is ongoing.", "logic": "\nDuplicate(henrieta)\nFumbling(henrieta)\nUnloving(henrieta)\nNeuronic(danika)\nDuplicate(danika)\nFumbling(danika)\nOngoing(danika)\nSafe(danika)\nUnloving(danika)\nPoetic(danika)\nDuplicate(gilbert)\nFumbling(gilbert)\nOngoing(gilbert)\nSafe(gilbert)\nUnloving(gilbert)\nPoetic(gilbert)\nforall x (Fumbling(x) and Duplicate(x) -> Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nFumbling(gilbert) -> Neuronic(gilbert)\nforall x (Unloving(x) and Fumbling(x) -> Duplicate(x))\nDuplicate(danika) -> Safe(danika)\nforall x (Fumbling(x) and Ongoing(x) -> Unloving(x))\n\nOngoing(gilbert)\n\ntherefore Ongoing(gilbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Hartwell is bivalved. Hartwell is womanly. Hartwell is voluminous. Shalom is insolent. Shalom is bivalved. Shalom is womanly. Shalom is unforested. Shalom is intragroup. Shalom is voluminous. Shalom is atactic. Elfie is bivalved. Elfie is womanly. Elfie is unforested. Elfie is intragroup. Elfie is voluminous. Elfie is atactic. All womanly, bivalved people are insolent. All insolent people are unforested. If Elfie is womanly then Elfie is insolent. If someone is voluminous and womanly then they are bivalved. If Shalom is bivalved then Shalom is intragroup. Nice, unforested people are voluminous. Shalom is not voluminous.", "logic": "\nBivalved(hartwell)\nWomanly(hartwell)\nVoluminous(hartwell)\nInsolent(shalom)\nBivalved(shalom)\nWomanly(shalom)\nUnforested(shalom)\nIntragroup(shalom)\nVoluminous(shalom)\nAtactic(shalom)\nBivalved(elfie)\nWomanly(elfie)\nUnforested(elfie)\nIntragroup(elfie)\nVoluminous(elfie)\nAtactic(elfie)\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Bivalved(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Unforested(x))\nWomanly(elfie) -> Insolent(elfie)\nforall x (Voluminous(x) and Womanly(x) -> Bivalved(x))\nBivalved(shalom) -> Intragroup(shalom)\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Unforested(x) -> Voluminous(x))\n\nnot Voluminous(shalom)\n\ntherefore Voluminous(shalom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Thornton is bastioned. Thornton is merged. Thornton is offending. Urban is meddling. Urban is bastioned. Urban is merged. Urban is flameproof. Urban is unanimous. Urban is offending. Urban is synoecious. Florentia is bastioned. Florentia is merged. Florentia is flameproof. Florentia is unanimous. Florentia is offending. Florentia is synoecious. All merged, bastioned people are meddling. All meddling people are flameproof. If Florentia is merged then Florentia is meddling. If someone is offending and merged then they are bastioned. If Urban is bastioned then Urban is unanimous. Nice, flameproof people are offending. Florentia is meddling.", "logic": "\nBastioned(thornton)\nMerged(thornton)\nOffending(thornton)\nMeddling(urban)\nBastioned(urban)\nMerged(urban)\nFlameproof(urban)\nUnanimous(urban)\nOffending(urban)\nSynoecious(urban)\nBastioned(florentia)\nMerged(florentia)\nFlameproof(florentia)\nUnanimous(florentia)\nOffending(florentia)\nSynoecious(florentia)\nforall x (Merged(x) and Bastioned(x) -> Meddling(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nMerged(florentia) -> Meddling(florentia)\nforall x (Offending(x) and Merged(x) -> Bastioned(x))\nBastioned(urban) -> Unanimous(urban)\nforall x (Merged(x) and Flameproof(x) -> Offending(x))\n\nMeddling(florentia)\n\nMerged(florentia) and Merged(florentia) -> Meddling(florentia) -> therefore Meddling(florentia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Brier is frozen. Brier is crownless. Brier is pedal. Udall is philistine. Udall is frozen. Udall is crownless. Udall is marbleised. Udall is leal. Udall is pedal. Udall is bacterial. Arline is frozen. Arline is crownless. Arline is marbleised. Arline is leal. Arline is pedal. Arline is bacterial. All crownless, frozen people are philistine. All philistine people are marbleised. If Arline is crownless then Arline is philistine. If someone is pedal and crownless then they are frozen. If Udall is frozen then Udall is leal. Nice, marbleised people are pedal. Arline is not philistine.", "logic": "\nFrozen(brier)\nCrownless(brier)\nPedal(brier)\nPhilistine(udall)\nFrozen(udall)\nCrownless(udall)\nMarbleised(udall)\nLeal(udall)\nPedal(udall)\nBacterial(udall)\nFrozen(arline)\nCrownless(arline)\nMarbleised(arline)\nLeal(arline)\nPedal(arline)\nBacterial(arline)\nforall x (Crownless(x) and Frozen(x) -> Philistine(x))\nforall x (Philistine(x) -> Marbleised(x))\nCrownless(arline) -> Philistine(arline)\nforall x (Pedal(x) and Crownless(x) -> Frozen(x))\nFrozen(udall) -> Leal(udall)\nforall x (Crownless(x) and Marbleised(x) -> Pedal(x))\n\nnot Philistine(arline)\n\nCrownless(arline) and Crownless(arline) -> Philistine(arline) -> therefore Philistine(arline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Odelle is bacteremic. Odelle is lite. Odelle is summary. Betsey is aneurysmal. Betsey is bacteremic. Betsey is lite. Betsey is affecting. Betsey is nonmotile. Betsey is summary. Betsey is piggy. Kiah is bacteremic. Kiah is lite. Kiah is affecting. Kiah is nonmotile. Kiah is summary. Kiah is piggy. All lite, bacteremic people are aneurysmal. All aneurysmal people are affecting. If Kiah is lite then Kiah is aneurysmal. If someone is summary and lite then they are bacteremic. If Betsey is bacteremic then Betsey is nonmotile. Nice, affecting people are summary. Odelle is affecting.", "logic": "\nBacteremic(odelle)\nLite(odelle)\nSummary(odelle)\nAneurysmal(betsey)\nBacteremic(betsey)\nLite(betsey)\nAffecting(betsey)\nNonmotile(betsey)\nSummary(betsey)\nPiggy(betsey)\nBacteremic(kiah)\nLite(kiah)\nAffecting(kiah)\nNonmotile(kiah)\nSummary(kiah)\nPiggy(kiah)\nforall x (Lite(x) and Bacteremic(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Affecting(x))\nLite(kiah) -> Aneurysmal(kiah)\nforall x (Summary(x) and Lite(x) -> Bacteremic(x))\nBacteremic(betsey) -> Nonmotile(betsey)\nforall x (Lite(x) and Affecting(x) -> Summary(x))\n\nAffecting(odelle)\n\nLite(odelle) and Bacteremic(odelle) and forall x (Lite(x) and Bacteremic(x) -> Aneurysmal(x)) -> therefore Aneurysmal(odelle) Aneurysmal(odelle) and forall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Affecting(x)) -> therefore Affecting(odelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Wiatt is geothermic. Wiatt is confused. Wiatt is indigo. Cornelia is buggy. Cornelia is geothermic. Cornelia is confused. Cornelia is hyoid. Cornelia is unstable. Cornelia is indigo. Cornelia is agog. Enid is geothermic. Enid is confused. Enid is hyoid. Enid is unstable. Enid is indigo. Enid is agog. All confused, geothermic people are buggy. All buggy people are hyoid. If Enid is confused then Enid is buggy. If someone is indigo and confused then they are geothermic. If Cornelia is geothermic then Cornelia is unstable. Nice, hyoid people are indigo. Wiatt is not hyoid.", "logic": "\nGeothermic(wiatt)\nConfused(wiatt)\nIndigo(wiatt)\nBuggy(cornelia)\nGeothermic(cornelia)\nConfused(cornelia)\nHyoid(cornelia)\nUnstable(cornelia)\nIndigo(cornelia)\nAgog(cornelia)\nGeothermic(enid)\nConfused(enid)\nHyoid(enid)\nUnstable(enid)\nIndigo(enid)\nAgog(enid)\nforall x (Confused(x) and Geothermic(x) -> Buggy(x))\nforall x (Buggy(x) -> Hyoid(x))\nConfused(enid) -> Buggy(enid)\nforall x (Indigo(x) and Confused(x) -> Geothermic(x))\nGeothermic(cornelia) -> Unstable(cornelia)\nforall x (Confused(x) and Hyoid(x) -> Indigo(x))\n\nnot Hyoid(wiatt)\n\nConfused(wiatt) and Geothermic(wiatt) and forall x (Confused(x) and Geothermic(x) -> Buggy(x)) -> therefore Buggy(wiatt) Buggy(wiatt) and forall x (Buggy(x) -> Hyoid(x)) -> therefore Hyoid(wiatt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Chery is agape. Chery is germane. Chery is published. Lincoln is enforced. Lincoln is agape. Lincoln is germane. Lincoln is urgent. Lincoln is umbilical. Lincoln is published. Lincoln is outfitted. Mauritz is agape. Mauritz is germane. Mauritz is urgent. Mauritz is umbilical. Mauritz is published. Mauritz is outfitted. All germane, agape people are enforced. All enforced people are urgent. If Mauritz is germane then Mauritz is enforced. If someone is published and germane then they are agape. If Lincoln is agape then Lincoln is umbilical. Nice, urgent people are published. Chery is not outfitted.", "logic": "\nAgape(chery)\nGermane(chery)\nPublished(chery)\nEnforced(lincoln)\nAgape(lincoln)\nGermane(lincoln)\nUrgent(lincoln)\nUmbilical(lincoln)\nPublished(lincoln)\nOutfitted(lincoln)\nAgape(mauritz)\nGermane(mauritz)\nUrgent(mauritz)\nUmbilical(mauritz)\nPublished(mauritz)\nOutfitted(mauritz)\nforall x (Germane(x) and Agape(x) -> Enforced(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) -> Urgent(x))\nGermane(mauritz) -> Enforced(mauritz)\nforall x (Published(x) and Germane(x) -> Agape(x))\nAgape(lincoln) -> Umbilical(lincoln)\nforall x (Germane(x) and Urgent(x) -> Published(x))\n\nnot Outfitted(chery)\n\nnot Outfitted(chery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Warren is banded. Warren is oversea. Warren is sundried. Tera is gettable. Tera is banded. Tera is oversea. Tera is extricable. Tera is obnoxious. Tera is sundried. Tera is sociable. Julee is banded. Julee is oversea. Julee is extricable. Julee is obnoxious. Julee is sundried. Julee is sociable. All oversea, banded people are gettable. All gettable people are extricable. If Julee is oversea then Julee is gettable. If someone is sundried and oversea then they are banded. If Tera is banded then Tera is obnoxious. Nice, extricable people are sundried. Warren is obnoxious.", "logic": "\nBanded(warren)\nOversea(warren)\nSundried(warren)\nGettable(tera)\nBanded(tera)\nOversea(tera)\nExtricable(tera)\nObnoxious(tera)\nSundried(tera)\nSociable(tera)\nBanded(julee)\nOversea(julee)\nExtricable(julee)\nObnoxious(julee)\nSundried(julee)\nSociable(julee)\nforall x (Oversea(x) and Banded(x) -> Gettable(x))\nforall x (Gettable(x) -> Extricable(x))\nOversea(julee) -> Gettable(julee)\nforall x (Sundried(x) and Oversea(x) -> Banded(x))\nBanded(tera) -> Obnoxious(tera)\nforall x (Oversea(x) and Extricable(x) -> Sundried(x))\n\nObnoxious(warren)\n\nObnoxious(warren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The carlyn is snuffling. The carlyn is not corroded. The matt does not like the carlyn. The matt loop the carlyn. The matt loop the rozelle. The fayth loop the carlyn. The rozelle spawn the fayth. If something spawn the rozelle and it does not see the rozelle then it loop the fayth. If something loop the carlyn then the carlyn spawn the fayth. If something loop the matt then it skreak the fayth. If something spawn the fayth then it spawn the matt. If something is corroded and it does not see the rozelle then it does not visit the rozelle. If something spawn the fayth then it does not like the rozelle. If the matt spawn the fayth and the fayth is unthinking then the matt is not fourfold. If something spawn the matt then the matt is snuffling. The carlyn is snuffling.", "logic": "\nSnuffling(carlyn)\nnot Corroded(carlyn)\nnot Skreak(matt, carlyn)\nLoop(matt, carlyn)\nLoop(matt, rozelle)\nLoop(fayth, carlyn)\nSpawn(rozelle, fayth)\nforall x (Spawn(x, rozelle) and not Loop(x, rozelle) -> Loop(x, fayth))\nforall x (Loop(x, carlyn) -> Spawn(carlyn, fayth))\nforall x (Loop(x, matt) -> Skreak(x, fayth))\nforall x (Spawn(x, fayth) -> Spawn(x, matt))\nforall x (Corroded(x) and not Loop(x, rozelle) -> not Spawn(x, rozelle))\nforall x (Spawn(x, fayth) -> not Skreak(x, rozelle))\nSpawn(matt, fayth) and Unthinking(fayth) -> not Fourfold(matt)\nforall x (Spawn(x, matt) -> Snuffling(matt))\n\nSnuffling(carlyn)\n\ntherefore Snuffling(carlyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The garcia is bushy. The garcia is not scripted. The merilee does not like the garcia. The merilee tarry the garcia. The merilee tarry the desdemona. The bennet tarry the garcia. The desdemona copy the bennet. If something copy the desdemona and it does not see the desdemona then it tarry the bennet. If something tarry the garcia then the garcia copy the bennet. If something tarry the merilee then it inoculate the bennet. If something copy the bennet then it copy the merilee. If something is scripted and it does not see the desdemona then it does not visit the desdemona. If something copy the bennet then it does not like the desdemona. If the merilee copy the bennet and the bennet is irksome then the merilee is not side. If something copy the merilee then the merilee is bushy. The merilee does not see the garcia.", "logic": "\nBushy(garcia)\nnot Scripted(garcia)\nnot Inoculate(merilee, garcia)\nTarry(merilee, garcia)\nTarry(merilee, desdemona)\nTarry(bennet, garcia)\nCopy(desdemona, bennet)\nforall x (Copy(x, desdemona) and not Tarry(x, desdemona) -> Tarry(x, bennet))\nforall x (Tarry(x, garcia) -> Copy(garcia, bennet))\nforall x (Tarry(x, merilee) -> Inoculate(x, bennet))\nforall x (Copy(x, bennet) -> Copy(x, merilee))\nforall x (Scripted(x) and not Tarry(x, desdemona) -> not Copy(x, desdemona))\nforall x (Copy(x, bennet) -> not Inoculate(x, desdemona))\nCopy(merilee, bennet) and Irksome(bennet) -> not Side(merilee)\nforall x (Copy(x, merilee) -> Bushy(merilee))\n\nnot Tarry(merilee, garcia)\n\ntherefore Tarry(merilee, garcia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The kathie is nascent. The kathie is not feral. The chuck does not like the kathie. The chuck entitle the kathie. The chuck entitle the mikel. The ranee entitle the kathie. The mikel flay the ranee. If something flay the mikel and it does not see the mikel then it entitle the ranee. If something entitle the kathie then the kathie flay the ranee. If something entitle the chuck then it parade the ranee. If something flay the ranee then it flay the chuck. If something is feral and it does not see the mikel then it does not visit the mikel. If something flay the ranee then it does not like the mikel. If the chuck flay the ranee and the ranee is maidenlike then the chuck is not baneful. If something flay the chuck then the chuck is nascent. The mikel flay the chuck.", "logic": "\nNascent(kathie)\nnot Feral(kathie)\nnot Parade(chuck, kathie)\nEntitle(chuck, kathie)\nEntitle(chuck, mikel)\nEntitle(ranee, kathie)\nFlay(mikel, ranee)\nforall x (Flay(x, mikel) and not Entitle(x, mikel) -> Entitle(x, ranee))\nforall x (Entitle(x, kathie) -> Flay(kathie, ranee))\nforall x (Entitle(x, chuck) -> Parade(x, ranee))\nforall x (Flay(x, ranee) -> Flay(x, chuck))\nforall x (Feral(x) and not Entitle(x, mikel) -> not Flay(x, mikel))\nforall x (Flay(x, ranee) -> not Parade(x, mikel))\nFlay(chuck, ranee) and Maidenlike(ranee) -> not Baneful(chuck)\nforall x (Flay(x, chuck) -> Nascent(chuck))\n\nFlay(mikel, chuck)\n\nFlay(mikel, ranee) and forall x (Flay(x, ranee) -> Flay(x, chuck)) -> therefore Flay(mikel, chuck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The andromeda is limited. The andromeda is not transitory. The sarah does not like the andromeda. The sarah mapquest the andromeda. The sarah mapquest the bertram. The olivier mapquest the andromeda. The bertram grind the olivier. If something grind the bertram and it does not see the bertram then it mapquest the olivier. If something mapquest the andromeda then the andromeda grind the olivier. If something mapquest the sarah then it stabilize the olivier. If something grind the olivier then it grind the sarah. If something is transitory and it does not see the bertram then it does not visit the bertram. If something grind the olivier then it does not like the bertram. If the sarah grind the olivier and the olivier is preceding then the sarah is not inglorious. If something grind the sarah then the sarah is limited. The bertram does not visit the sarah.", "logic": "\nLimited(andromeda)\nnot Transitory(andromeda)\nnot Stabilize(sarah, andromeda)\nMapquest(sarah, andromeda)\nMapquest(sarah, bertram)\nMapquest(olivier, andromeda)\nGrind(bertram, olivier)\nforall x (Grind(x, bertram) and not Mapquest(x, bertram) -> Mapquest(x, olivier))\nforall x (Mapquest(x, andromeda) -> Grind(andromeda, olivier))\nforall x (Mapquest(x, sarah) -> Stabilize(x, olivier))\nforall x (Grind(x, olivier) -> Grind(x, sarah))\nforall x (Transitory(x) and not Mapquest(x, bertram) -> not Grind(x, bertram))\nforall x (Grind(x, olivier) -> not Stabilize(x, bertram))\nGrind(sarah, olivier) and Preceding(olivier) -> not Inglorious(sarah)\nforall x (Grind(x, sarah) -> Limited(sarah))\n\nnot Grind(bertram, sarah)\n\nGrind(bertram, olivier) and forall x (Grind(x, olivier) -> Grind(x, sarah)) -> therefore Grind(bertram, sarah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The leonardo is poltroon. The leonardo is not nutritious. The callie does not like the leonardo. The callie collide the leonardo. The callie collide the evanne. The siegfried collide the leonardo. The evanne arbitrate the siegfried. If something arbitrate the evanne and it does not see the evanne then it collide the siegfried. If something collide the leonardo then the leonardo arbitrate the siegfried. If something collide the callie then it impair the siegfried. If something arbitrate the siegfried then it arbitrate the callie. If something is nutritious and it does not see the evanne then it does not visit the evanne. If something arbitrate the siegfried then it does not like the evanne. If the callie arbitrate the siegfried and the siegfried is caring then the callie is not cleansing. If something arbitrate the callie then the callie is poltroon. The leonardo does not like the evanne.", "logic": "\nPoltroon(leonardo)\nnot Nutritious(leonardo)\nnot Impair(callie, leonardo)\nCollide(callie, leonardo)\nCollide(callie, evanne)\nCollide(siegfried, leonardo)\nArbitrate(evanne, siegfried)\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, evanne) and not Collide(x, evanne) -> Collide(x, siegfried))\nforall x (Collide(x, leonardo) -> Arbitrate(leonardo, siegfried))\nforall x (Collide(x, callie) -> Impair(x, siegfried))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, siegfried) -> Arbitrate(x, callie))\nforall x (Nutritious(x) and not Collide(x, evanne) -> not Arbitrate(x, evanne))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, siegfried) -> not Impair(x, evanne))\nArbitrate(callie, siegfried) and Caring(siegfried) -> not Cleansing(callie)\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, callie) -> Poltroon(callie))\n\nnot Impair(leonardo, evanne)\n\nCollide(callie, leonardo) and forall x (Collide(x, leonardo) -> Arbitrate(leonardo, siegfried)) -> therefore Arbitrate(leonardo, siegfried) Arbitrate(leonardo, siegfried) and forall x (Arbitrate(x, siegfried) -> not Impair(x, evanne)) -> therefore not Impair(leonardo, evanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The douglas is pestered. The douglas is not lxxvii. The shanie does not like the douglas. The shanie chirp the douglas. The shanie chirp the taddeo. The daveen chirp the douglas. The taddeo avenge the daveen. If something avenge the taddeo and it does not see the taddeo then it chirp the daveen. If something chirp the douglas then the douglas avenge the daveen. If something chirp the shanie then it extricate the daveen. If something avenge the daveen then it avenge the shanie. If something is lxxvii and it does not see the taddeo then it does not visit the taddeo. If something avenge the daveen then it does not like the taddeo. If the shanie avenge the daveen and the daveen is wrenching then the shanie is not armlike. If something avenge the shanie then the shanie is pestered. The shanie is not pestered.", "logic": "\nPestered(douglas)\nnot Lxxvii(douglas)\nnot Extricate(shanie, douglas)\nChirp(shanie, douglas)\nChirp(shanie, taddeo)\nChirp(daveen, douglas)\nAvenge(taddeo, daveen)\nforall x (Avenge(x, taddeo) and not Chirp(x, taddeo) -> Chirp(x, daveen))\nforall x (Chirp(x, douglas) -> Avenge(douglas, daveen))\nforall x (Chirp(x, shanie) -> Extricate(x, daveen))\nforall x (Avenge(x, daveen) -> Avenge(x, shanie))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) and not Chirp(x, taddeo) -> not Avenge(x, taddeo))\nforall x (Avenge(x, daveen) -> not Extricate(x, taddeo))\nAvenge(shanie, daveen) and Wrenching(daveen) -> not Armlike(shanie)\nforall x (Avenge(x, shanie) -> Pestered(shanie))\n\nnot Pestered(shanie)\n\nAvenge(taddeo, daveen) and forall x (Avenge(x, daveen) -> Avenge(x, shanie)) -> therefore Avenge(taddeo, shanie) Avenge(taddeo, shanie) and forall x (Avenge(x, shanie) -> Pestered(shanie)) -> therefore Pestered(shanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The samuele is biaural. The samuele is not flemish. The juliane does not like the samuele. The juliane bewitch the samuele. The juliane bewitch the jefry. The elihu bewitch the samuele. The jefry walk the elihu. If something walk the jefry and it does not see the jefry then it bewitch the elihu. If something bewitch the samuele then the samuele walk the elihu. If something bewitch the juliane then it stutter the elihu. If something walk the elihu then it walk the juliane. If something is flemish and it does not see the jefry then it does not visit the jefry. If something walk the elihu then it does not like the jefry. If the juliane walk the elihu and the elihu is mutable then the juliane is not toxicant. If something walk the juliane then the juliane is biaural. The juliane does not visit the juliane.", "logic": "\nBiaural(samuele)\nnot Flemish(samuele)\nnot Stutter(juliane, samuele)\nBewitch(juliane, samuele)\nBewitch(juliane, jefry)\nBewitch(elihu, samuele)\nWalk(jefry, elihu)\nforall x (Walk(x, jefry) and not Bewitch(x, jefry) -> Bewitch(x, elihu))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, samuele) -> Walk(samuele, elihu))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, juliane) -> Stutter(x, elihu))\nforall x (Walk(x, elihu) -> Walk(x, juliane))\nforall x (Flemish(x) and not Bewitch(x, jefry) -> not Walk(x, jefry))\nforall x (Walk(x, elihu) -> not Stutter(x, jefry))\nWalk(juliane, elihu) and Mutable(elihu) -> not Toxicant(juliane)\nforall x (Walk(x, juliane) -> Biaural(juliane))\n\nnot Walk(juliane, juliane)\n\nforall x (Walk(x, elihu) -> Walk(x, juliane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The zebedee is unsexed. The zebedee is not deflated. The lulita does not like the zebedee. The lulita mouse the zebedee. The lulita mouse the lotti. The thurstan mouse the zebedee. The lotti breathe the thurstan. If something breathe the lotti and it does not see the lotti then it mouse the thurstan. If something mouse the zebedee then the zebedee breathe the thurstan. If something mouse the lulita then it collect the thurstan. If something breathe the thurstan then it breathe the lulita. If something is deflated and it does not see the lotti then it does not visit the lotti. If something breathe the thurstan then it does not like the lotti. If the lulita breathe the thurstan and the thurstan is funguslike then the lulita is not nonmotile. If something breathe the lulita then the lulita is unsexed. The zebedee mouse the thurstan.", "logic": "\nUnsexed(zebedee)\nnot Deflated(zebedee)\nnot Collect(lulita, zebedee)\nMouse(lulita, zebedee)\nMouse(lulita, lotti)\nMouse(thurstan, zebedee)\nBreathe(lotti, thurstan)\nforall x (Breathe(x, lotti) and not Mouse(x, lotti) -> Mouse(x, thurstan))\nforall x (Mouse(x, zebedee) -> Breathe(zebedee, thurstan))\nforall x (Mouse(x, lulita) -> Collect(x, thurstan))\nforall x (Breathe(x, thurstan) -> Breathe(x, lulita))\nforall x (Deflated(x) and not Mouse(x, lotti) -> not Breathe(x, lotti))\nforall x (Breathe(x, thurstan) -> not Collect(x, lotti))\nBreathe(lulita, thurstan) and Funguslike(thurstan) -> not Nonmotile(lulita)\nforall x (Breathe(x, lulita) -> Unsexed(lulita))\n\nMouse(zebedee, thurstan)\n\nforall x (Breathe(x, lotti) and not Mouse(x, lotti) -> Mouse(x, thurstan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The regen is barbate. The regen is not laminar. The avivah does not like the regen. The avivah inveigle the regen. The avivah inveigle the kevin. The jeremiah inveigle the regen. The kevin edify the jeremiah. If something edify the kevin and it does not see the kevin then it inveigle the jeremiah. If something inveigle the regen then the regen edify the jeremiah. If something inveigle the avivah then it spill the jeremiah. If something edify the jeremiah then it edify the avivah. If something is laminar and it does not see the kevin then it does not visit the kevin. If something edify the jeremiah then it does not like the kevin. If the avivah edify the jeremiah and the jeremiah is needled then the avivah is not scrofulous. If something edify the avivah then the avivah is barbate. The kevin does not like the jeremiah.", "logic": "\nBarbate(regen)\nnot Laminar(regen)\nnot Spill(avivah, regen)\nInveigle(avivah, regen)\nInveigle(avivah, kevin)\nInveigle(jeremiah, regen)\nEdify(kevin, jeremiah)\nforall x (Edify(x, kevin) and not Inveigle(x, kevin) -> Inveigle(x, jeremiah))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, regen) -> Edify(regen, jeremiah))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, avivah) -> Spill(x, jeremiah))\nforall x (Edify(x, jeremiah) -> Edify(x, avivah))\nforall x (Laminar(x) and not Inveigle(x, kevin) -> not Edify(x, kevin))\nforall x (Edify(x, jeremiah) -> not Spill(x, kevin))\nEdify(avivah, jeremiah) and Needled(jeremiah) -> not Scrofulous(avivah)\nforall x (Edify(x, avivah) -> Barbate(avivah))\n\nnot Spill(kevin, jeremiah)\n\nforall x (Inveigle(x, avivah) -> Spill(x, jeremiah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The pearl is casteless. The pearl is not farfetched. The dael does not like the pearl. The dael compound the pearl. The dael compound the bee. The uta compound the pearl. The bee carbonate the uta. If something carbonate the bee and it does not see the bee then it compound the uta. If something compound the pearl then the pearl carbonate the uta. If something compound the dael then it emplane the uta. If something carbonate the uta then it carbonate the dael. If something is farfetched and it does not see the bee then it does not visit the bee. If something carbonate the uta then it does not like the bee. If the dael carbonate the uta and the uta is bacchantic then the dael is not abject. If something carbonate the dael then the dael is casteless. The uta is farfetched.", "logic": "\nCasteless(pearl)\nnot Farfetched(pearl)\nnot Emplane(dael, pearl)\nCompound(dael, pearl)\nCompound(dael, bee)\nCompound(uta, pearl)\nCarbonate(bee, uta)\nforall x (Carbonate(x, bee) and not Compound(x, bee) -> Compound(x, uta))\nforall x (Compound(x, pearl) -> Carbonate(pearl, uta))\nforall x (Compound(x, dael) -> Emplane(x, uta))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, uta) -> Carbonate(x, dael))\nforall x (Farfetched(x) and not Compound(x, bee) -> not Carbonate(x, bee))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, uta) -> not Emplane(x, bee))\nCarbonate(dael, uta) and Bacchantic(uta) -> not Abject(dael)\nforall x (Carbonate(x, dael) -> Casteless(dael))\n\nFarfetched(uta)\n\nFarfetched(uta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The cristin is pinkish. The cristin is not violent. The quigman does not like the cristin. The quigman sexualise the cristin. The quigman sexualise the catherina. The jacinta sexualise the cristin. The catherina tempt the jacinta. If something tempt the catherina and it does not see the catherina then it sexualise the jacinta. If something sexualise the cristin then the cristin tempt the jacinta. If something sexualise the quigman then it suntan the jacinta. If something tempt the jacinta then it tempt the quigman. If something is violent and it does not see the catherina then it does not visit the catherina. If something tempt the jacinta then it does not like the catherina. If the quigman tempt the jacinta and the jacinta is archaic then the quigman is not fatless. If something tempt the quigman then the quigman is pinkish. The quigman is not violent.", "logic": "\nPinkish(cristin)\nnot Violent(cristin)\nnot Suntan(quigman, cristin)\nSexualise(quigman, cristin)\nSexualise(quigman, catherina)\nSexualise(jacinta, cristin)\nTempt(catherina, jacinta)\nforall x (Tempt(x, catherina) and not Sexualise(x, catherina) -> Sexualise(x, jacinta))\nforall x (Sexualise(x, cristin) -> Tempt(cristin, jacinta))\nforall x (Sexualise(x, quigman) -> Suntan(x, jacinta))\nforall x (Tempt(x, jacinta) -> Tempt(x, quigman))\nforall x (Violent(x) and not Sexualise(x, catherina) -> not Tempt(x, catherina))\nforall x (Tempt(x, jacinta) -> not Suntan(x, catherina))\nTempt(quigman, jacinta) and Archaic(jacinta) -> not Fatless(quigman)\nforall x (Tempt(x, quigman) -> Pinkish(quigman))\n\nnot Violent(quigman)\n\nnot Violent(quigman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The lyn is offside. The lyn is not unthought. The axel does not like the lyn. The axel dish the lyn. The axel dish the bryana. The salomo dish the lyn. The bryana handstamp the salomo. If something handstamp the bryana and it does not see the bryana then it dish the salomo. If something dish the lyn then the lyn handstamp the salomo. If something dish the axel then it jest the salomo. If something handstamp the salomo then it handstamp the axel. If something is unthought and it does not see the bryana then it does not visit the bryana. If something handstamp the salomo then it does not like the bryana. If the axel handstamp the salomo and the salomo is fluvial then the axel is not melting. If something handstamp the axel then the axel is offside. The salomo jest the bryana.", "logic": "\nOffside(lyn)\nnot Unthought(lyn)\nnot Jest(axel, lyn)\nDish(axel, lyn)\nDish(axel, bryana)\nDish(salomo, lyn)\nHandstamp(bryana, salomo)\nforall x (Handstamp(x, bryana) and not Dish(x, bryana) -> Dish(x, salomo))\nforall x (Dish(x, lyn) -> Handstamp(lyn, salomo))\nforall x (Dish(x, axel) -> Jest(x, salomo))\nforall x (Handstamp(x, salomo) -> Handstamp(x, axel))\nforall x (Unthought(x) and not Dish(x, bryana) -> not Handstamp(x, bryana))\nforall x (Handstamp(x, salomo) -> not Jest(x, bryana))\nHandstamp(axel, salomo) and Fluvial(salomo) -> not Melting(axel)\nforall x (Handstamp(x, axel) -> Offside(axel))\n\nJest(salomo, bryana)\n\nJest(salomo, bryana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The tammi is workable. The tammi implode the jess. The con is finite. The con implode the sybyl. The con euphemize the tammi. The con euphemize the sybyl. The jess is finite. The jess is katabatic. The jess implode the tammi. The jess implode the sybyl. The jess euphemize the con. The jess euphemize the sybyl. The sybyl implode the con. The sybyl implode the jess. The sybyl trifurcate the jess. If someone euphemize the con then they visit the sybyl. If someone trifurcate the sybyl then they need the jess. The con euphemize the sybyl.", "logic": "\nWorkable(tammi)\nImplode(tammi, jess)\nFinite(con)\nImplode(con, sybyl)\nEuphemize(con, tammi)\nEuphemize(con, sybyl)\nFinite(jess)\nKatabatic(jess)\nImplode(jess, tammi)\nImplode(jess, sybyl)\nEuphemize(jess, con)\nEuphemize(jess, sybyl)\nImplode(sybyl, con)\nImplode(sybyl, jess)\nTrifurcate(sybyl, jess)\nforall x (Euphemize(x, con) -> Trifurcate(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, sybyl) -> Implode(x, jess))\n\nEuphemize(con, sybyl)\n\ntherefore Euphemize(con, sybyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The job is thickening. The job smatter the hernando. The yves is hungarian. The yves smatter the madge. The yves steel the job. The yves steel the madge. The hernando is hungarian. The hernando is cyprinid. The hernando smatter the job. The hernando smatter the madge. The hernando steel the yves. The hernando steel the madge. The madge smatter the yves. The madge smatter the hernando. The madge interlope the hernando. If someone steel the yves then they visit the madge. If someone interlope the madge then they need the hernando. The hernando is not hungarian.", "logic": "\nThickening(job)\nSmatter(job, hernando)\nHungarian(yves)\nSmatter(yves, madge)\nSteel(yves, job)\nSteel(yves, madge)\nHungarian(hernando)\nCyprinid(hernando)\nSmatter(hernando, job)\nSmatter(hernando, madge)\nSteel(hernando, yves)\nSteel(hernando, madge)\nSmatter(madge, yves)\nSmatter(madge, hernando)\nInterlope(madge, hernando)\nforall x (Steel(x, yves) -> Interlope(x, madge))\nforall x (Interlope(x, madge) -> Smatter(x, hernando))\n\nnot Hungarian(hernando)\n\ntherefore Hungarian(hernando)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The lothar is azido. The lothar drawl the markus. The faina is misplaced. The faina drawl the chaim. The faina forge the lothar. The faina forge the chaim. The markus is misplaced. The markus is unfailing. The markus drawl the lothar. The markus drawl the chaim. The markus forge the faina. The markus forge the chaim. The chaim drawl the faina. The chaim drawl the markus. The chaim bemire the markus. If someone forge the faina then they visit the chaim. If someone bemire the chaim then they need the markus. The markus bemire the chaim.", "logic": "\nAzido(lothar)\nDrawl(lothar, markus)\nMisplaced(faina)\nDrawl(faina, chaim)\nForge(faina, lothar)\nForge(faina, chaim)\nMisplaced(markus)\nUnfailing(markus)\nDrawl(markus, lothar)\nDrawl(markus, chaim)\nForge(markus, faina)\nForge(markus, chaim)\nDrawl(chaim, faina)\nDrawl(chaim, markus)\nBemire(chaim, markus)\nforall x (Forge(x, faina) -> Bemire(x, chaim))\nforall x (Bemire(x, chaim) -> Drawl(x, markus))\n\nBemire(markus, chaim)\n\nForge(markus, faina) and forall x (Forge(x, faina) -> Bemire(x, chaim)) -> therefore Bemire(markus, chaim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The nickolas is depictive. The nickolas popularise the love. The evita is plundered. The evita popularise the perl. The evita charter the nickolas. The evita charter the perl. The love is plundered. The love is songlike. The love popularise the nickolas. The love popularise the perl. The love charter the evita. The love charter the perl. The perl popularise the evita. The perl popularise the love. The perl reseal the love. If someone charter the evita then they visit the perl. If someone reseal the perl then they need the love. The love does not visit the perl.", "logic": "\nDepictive(nickolas)\nPopularise(nickolas, love)\nPlundered(evita)\nPopularise(evita, perl)\nCharter(evita, nickolas)\nCharter(evita, perl)\nPlundered(love)\nSonglike(love)\nPopularise(love, nickolas)\nPopularise(love, perl)\nCharter(love, evita)\nCharter(love, perl)\nPopularise(perl, evita)\nPopularise(perl, love)\nReseal(perl, love)\nforall x (Charter(x, evita) -> Reseal(x, perl))\nforall x (Reseal(x, perl) -> Popularise(x, love))\n\nnot Reseal(love, perl)\n\nCharter(love, evita) and forall x (Charter(x, evita) -> Reseal(x, perl)) -> therefore Reseal(love, perl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The pauly is favourable. The pauly colorise the abbe. The farley is voiced. The farley colorise the lurline. The farley eyewitness the pauly. The farley eyewitness the lurline. The abbe is voiced. The abbe is synaptic. The abbe colorise the pauly. The abbe colorise the lurline. The abbe eyewitness the farley. The abbe eyewitness the lurline. The lurline colorise the farley. The lurline colorise the abbe. The lurline froth the abbe. If someone eyewitness the farley then they visit the lurline. If someone froth the lurline then they need the abbe. The abbe colorise the abbe.", "logic": "\nFavourable(pauly)\nColorise(pauly, abbe)\nVoiced(farley)\nColorise(farley, lurline)\nEyewitness(farley, pauly)\nEyewitness(farley, lurline)\nVoiced(abbe)\nSynaptic(abbe)\nColorise(abbe, pauly)\nColorise(abbe, lurline)\nEyewitness(abbe, farley)\nEyewitness(abbe, lurline)\nColorise(lurline, farley)\nColorise(lurline, abbe)\nFroth(lurline, abbe)\nforall x (Eyewitness(x, farley) -> Froth(x, lurline))\nforall x (Froth(x, lurline) -> Colorise(x, abbe))\n\nColorise(abbe, abbe)\n\nEyewitness(abbe, farley) and forall x (Eyewitness(x, farley) -> Froth(x, lurline)) -> therefore Froth(abbe, lurline) Froth(abbe, lurline) and forall x (Froth(x, lurline) -> Colorise(x, abbe)) -> therefore Colorise(abbe, abbe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The roderic is sixteen. The roderic thaw the pandora. The babita is appellate. The babita thaw the ralina. The babita slather the roderic. The babita slather the ralina. The pandora is appellate. The pandora is funguslike. The pandora thaw the roderic. The pandora thaw the ralina. The pandora slather the babita. The pandora slather the ralina. The ralina thaw the babita. The ralina thaw the pandora. The ralina rouse the pandora. If someone slather the babita then they visit the ralina. If someone rouse the ralina then they need the pandora. The pandora does not need the pandora.", "logic": "\nSixteen(roderic)\nThaw(roderic, pandora)\nAppellate(babita)\nThaw(babita, ralina)\nSlather(babita, roderic)\nSlather(babita, ralina)\nAppellate(pandora)\nFunguslike(pandora)\nThaw(pandora, roderic)\nThaw(pandora, ralina)\nSlather(pandora, babita)\nSlather(pandora, ralina)\nThaw(ralina, babita)\nThaw(ralina, pandora)\nRouse(ralina, pandora)\nforall x (Slather(x, babita) -> Rouse(x, ralina))\nforall x (Rouse(x, ralina) -> Thaw(x, pandora))\n\nnot Thaw(pandora, pandora)\n\nSlather(pandora, babita) and forall x (Slather(x, babita) -> Rouse(x, ralina)) -> therefore Rouse(pandora, ralina) Rouse(pandora, ralina) and forall x (Rouse(x, ralina) -> Thaw(x, pandora)) -> therefore Thaw(pandora, pandora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The jemie is immovable. The jemie palsy the winn. The candy is steamed. The candy palsy the germana. The candy send the jemie. The candy send the germana. The winn is steamed. The winn is maiden. The winn palsy the jemie. The winn palsy the germana. The winn send the candy. The winn send the germana. The germana palsy the candy. The germana palsy the winn. The germana mouth the winn. If someone send the candy then they visit the germana. If someone mouth the germana then they need the winn. The candy does not need the winn.", "logic": "\nImmovable(jemie)\nPalsy(jemie, winn)\nSteamed(candy)\nPalsy(candy, germana)\nSend(candy, jemie)\nSend(candy, germana)\nSteamed(winn)\nMaiden(winn)\nPalsy(winn, jemie)\nPalsy(winn, germana)\nSend(winn, candy)\nSend(winn, germana)\nPalsy(germana, candy)\nPalsy(germana, winn)\nMouth(germana, winn)\nforall x (Send(x, candy) -> Mouth(x, germana))\nforall x (Mouth(x, germana) -> Palsy(x, winn))\n\nnot Palsy(candy, winn)\n\nforall x (Mouth(x, germana) -> Palsy(x, winn)) <- forall x (Send(x, candy) -> Mouth(x, germana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The royal is ferrous. The royal communise the jocelin. The amberly is prefaded. The amberly communise the ikey. The amberly outlaw the royal. The amberly outlaw the ikey. The jocelin is prefaded. The jocelin is productive. The jocelin communise the royal. The jocelin communise the ikey. The jocelin outlaw the amberly. The jocelin outlaw the ikey. The ikey communise the amberly. The ikey communise the jocelin. The ikey animalize the jocelin. If someone outlaw the amberly then they visit the ikey. If someone animalize the ikey then they need the jocelin. The ikey animalize the ikey.", "logic": "\nFerrous(royal)\nCommunise(royal, jocelin)\nPrefaded(amberly)\nCommunise(amberly, ikey)\nOutlaw(amberly, royal)\nOutlaw(amberly, ikey)\nPrefaded(jocelin)\nProductive(jocelin)\nCommunise(jocelin, royal)\nCommunise(jocelin, ikey)\nOutlaw(jocelin, amberly)\nOutlaw(jocelin, ikey)\nCommunise(ikey, amberly)\nCommunise(ikey, jocelin)\nAnimalize(ikey, jocelin)\nforall x (Outlaw(x, amberly) -> Animalize(x, ikey))\nforall x (Animalize(x, ikey) -> Communise(x, jocelin))\n\nAnimalize(ikey, ikey)\n\nforall x (Outlaw(x, amberly) -> Animalize(x, ikey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The keriann is shuddering. The keriann resolve the sterling. The loise is verbalised. The loise resolve the kore. The loise blacken the keriann. The loise blacken the kore. The sterling is verbalised. The sterling is lemony. The sterling resolve the keriann. The sterling resolve the kore. The sterling blacken the loise. The sterling blacken the kore. The kore resolve the loise. The kore resolve the sterling. The kore come the sterling. If someone blacken the loise then they visit the kore. If someone come the kore then they need the sterling. The keriann does not visit the kore.", "logic": "\nShuddering(keriann)\nResolve(keriann, sterling)\nVerbalised(loise)\nResolve(loise, kore)\nBlacken(loise, keriann)\nBlacken(loise, kore)\nVerbalised(sterling)\nLemony(sterling)\nResolve(sterling, keriann)\nResolve(sterling, kore)\nBlacken(sterling, loise)\nBlacken(sterling, kore)\nResolve(kore, loise)\nResolve(kore, sterling)\nCome(kore, sterling)\nforall x (Blacken(x, loise) -> Come(x, kore))\nforall x (Come(x, kore) -> Resolve(x, sterling))\n\nnot Come(keriann, kore)\n\nforall x (Blacken(x, loise) -> Come(x, kore)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The avril is benthic. The avril baby the kerianne. The lynnelle is hastate. The lynnelle baby the sloane. The lynnelle trench the avril. The lynnelle trench the sloane. The kerianne is hastate. The kerianne is employable. The kerianne baby the avril. The kerianne baby the sloane. The kerianne trench the lynnelle. The kerianne trench the sloane. The sloane baby the lynnelle. The sloane baby the kerianne. The sloane flush the kerianne. If someone trench the lynnelle then they visit the sloane. If someone flush the sloane then they need the kerianne. The sloane is benthic.", "logic": "\nBenthic(avril)\nBaby(avril, kerianne)\nHastate(lynnelle)\nBaby(lynnelle, sloane)\nTrench(lynnelle, avril)\nTrench(lynnelle, sloane)\nHastate(kerianne)\nEmployable(kerianne)\nBaby(kerianne, avril)\nBaby(kerianne, sloane)\nTrench(kerianne, lynnelle)\nTrench(kerianne, sloane)\nBaby(sloane, lynnelle)\nBaby(sloane, kerianne)\nFlush(sloane, kerianne)\nforall x (Trench(x, lynnelle) -> Flush(x, sloane))\nforall x (Flush(x, sloane) -> Baby(x, kerianne))\n\nBenthic(sloane)\n\nBenthic(sloane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The french is bypast. The french scurry the sukey. The celestine is katharobic. The celestine scurry the lizbeth. The celestine schematise the french. The celestine schematise the lizbeth. The sukey is katharobic. The sukey is paralyzed. The sukey scurry the french. The sukey scurry the lizbeth. The sukey schematise the celestine. The sukey schematise the lizbeth. The lizbeth scurry the celestine. The lizbeth scurry the sukey. The lizbeth dispirit the sukey. If someone schematise the celestine then they visit the lizbeth. If someone dispirit the lizbeth then they need the sukey. The celestine does not need the french.", "logic": "\nBypast(french)\nScurry(french, sukey)\nKatharobic(celestine)\nScurry(celestine, lizbeth)\nSchematise(celestine, french)\nSchematise(celestine, lizbeth)\nKatharobic(sukey)\nParalyzed(sukey)\nScurry(sukey, french)\nScurry(sukey, lizbeth)\nSchematise(sukey, celestine)\nSchematise(sukey, lizbeth)\nScurry(lizbeth, celestine)\nScurry(lizbeth, sukey)\nDispirit(lizbeth, sukey)\nforall x (Schematise(x, celestine) -> Dispirit(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Dispirit(x, lizbeth) -> Scurry(x, sukey))\n\nnot Scurry(celestine, french)\n\nnot Scurry(celestine, french) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The bonnie is cankerous. The bonnie exult the ardine. The gleda is eritrean. The gleda exult the rochella. The gleda waddle the bonnie. The gleda waddle the rochella. The ardine is eritrean. The ardine is maverick. The ardine exult the bonnie. The ardine exult the rochella. The ardine waddle the gleda. The ardine waddle the rochella. The rochella exult the gleda. The rochella exult the ardine. The rochella cowl the ardine. If someone waddle the gleda then they visit the rochella. If someone cowl the rochella then they need the ardine. The ardine cowl the bonnie.", "logic": "\nCankerous(bonnie)\nExult(bonnie, ardine)\nEritrean(gleda)\nExult(gleda, rochella)\nWaddle(gleda, bonnie)\nWaddle(gleda, rochella)\nEritrean(ardine)\nMaverick(ardine)\nExult(ardine, bonnie)\nExult(ardine, rochella)\nWaddle(ardine, gleda)\nWaddle(ardine, rochella)\nExult(rochella, gleda)\nExult(rochella, ardine)\nCowl(rochella, ardine)\nforall x (Waddle(x, gleda) -> Cowl(x, rochella))\nforall x (Cowl(x, rochella) -> Exult(x, ardine))\n\nCowl(ardine, bonnie)\n\nCowl(ardine, bonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1284"} {"premises": "The edin is tested. Green things are gallant. All tilted things are lovesick. If the edin is unblessed then the edin is tilted. Rough, lovesick things are tilted. If something is lovesick then it is tilted. If the edin is tested then the edin is unblessed. The edin is tested.", "logic": "\nTested(edin)\nforall x (Lovesick(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Lovesick(x))\nUnblessed(edin) -> Tilted(edin)\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Lovesick(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Lovesick(x) -> Tilted(x))\nTested(edin) -> Unblessed(edin)\n\nTested(edin)\n\ntherefore Tested(edin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "The ada is nonskid. Green things are stone. All heated things are aboulic. If the ada is branchial then the ada is heated. Rough, aboulic things are heated. If something is aboulic then it is heated. If the ada is nonskid then the ada is branchial. The ada is not nonskid.", "logic": "\nNonskid(ada)\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Stone(x))\nforall x (Heated(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nBranchial(ada) -> Heated(ada)\nforall x (Stone(x) and Aboulic(x) -> Heated(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Heated(x))\nNonskid(ada) -> Branchial(ada)\n\nnot Nonskid(ada)\n\ntherefore Nonskid(ada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "The bennie is jurassic. Green things are blinking. All colorful things are jewelled. If the bennie is worsened then the bennie is colorful. Rough, jewelled things are colorful. If something is jewelled then it is colorful. If the bennie is jurassic then the bennie is worsened. The bennie is worsened.", "logic": "\nJurassic(bennie)\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Blinking(x))\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nWorsened(bennie) -> Colorful(bennie)\nforall x (Blinking(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Colorful(x))\nJurassic(bennie) -> Worsened(bennie)\n\nWorsened(bennie)\n\nJurassic(bennie) and Jurassic(bennie) -> Worsened(bennie) -> therefore Worsened(bennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "The gonzalo is dissonant. Green things are epilithic. All adulatory things are gilled. If the gonzalo is permeative then the gonzalo is adulatory. Rough, gilled things are adulatory. If something is gilled then it is adulatory. If the gonzalo is dissonant then the gonzalo is permeative. The gonzalo is not permeative.", "logic": "\nDissonant(gonzalo)\nforall x (Gilled(x) -> Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Adulatory(x) -> Gilled(x))\nPermeative(gonzalo) -> Adulatory(gonzalo)\nforall x (Epilithic(x) and Gilled(x) -> Adulatory(x))\nforall x (Gilled(x) -> Adulatory(x))\nDissonant(gonzalo) -> Permeative(gonzalo)\n\nnot Permeative(gonzalo)\n\nDissonant(gonzalo) and Dissonant(gonzalo) -> Permeative(gonzalo) -> therefore Permeative(gonzalo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "The harriot is aliphatic. Green things are disgusted. All heritable things are hebraic. If the harriot is garlicky then the harriot is heritable. Rough, hebraic things are heritable. If something is hebraic then it is heritable. If the harriot is aliphatic then the harriot is garlicky. The harriot is heritable.", "logic": "\nAliphatic(harriot)\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Disgusted(x))\nforall x (Heritable(x) -> Hebraic(x))\nGarlicky(harriot) -> Heritable(harriot)\nforall x (Disgusted(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Heritable(x))\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Heritable(x))\nAliphatic(harriot) -> Garlicky(harriot)\n\nHeritable(harriot)\n\nAliphatic(harriot) and Aliphatic(harriot) -> Garlicky(harriot) -> therefore Garlicky(harriot) Garlicky(harriot) and Garlicky(harriot) -> Heritable(harriot) -> therefore Heritable(harriot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "The marinna is gingery. Green things are rearmost. All shed things are grecian. If the marinna is arthralgic then the marinna is shed. Rough, grecian things are shed. If something is grecian then it is shed. If the marinna is gingery then the marinna is arthralgic. The marinna is not shed.", "logic": "\nGingery(marinna)\nforall x (Grecian(x) -> Rearmost(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) -> Grecian(x))\nArthralgic(marinna) -> Shed(marinna)\nforall x (Rearmost(x) and Grecian(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Grecian(x) -> Shed(x))\nGingery(marinna) -> Arthralgic(marinna)\n\nnot Shed(marinna)\n\nGingery(marinna) and Gingery(marinna) -> Arthralgic(marinna) -> therefore Arthralgic(marinna) Arthralgic(marinna) and Arthralgic(marinna) -> Shed(marinna) -> therefore Shed(marinna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "The tobi is cyclonal. Green things are proactive. All ossiculate things are preeminent. If the tobi is twinning then the tobi is ossiculate. Rough, preeminent things are ossiculate. If something is preeminent then it is ossiculate. If the tobi is cyclonal then the tobi is twinning. The tobi does not see the tobi.", "logic": "\nCyclonal(tobi)\nforall x (Preeminent(x) -> Proactive(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Preeminent(x))\nTwinning(tobi) -> Ossiculate(tobi)\nforall x (Proactive(x) and Preeminent(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Preeminent(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nCyclonal(tobi) -> Twinning(tobi)\n\nnot Sees(tobi, tobi)\n\nnot Sees(tobi, tobi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "The misty is jesting. Green things are imbecile. All facial things are indexless. If the misty is placed then the misty is facial. Rough, indexless things are facial. If something is indexless then it is facial. If the misty is jesting then the misty is placed. The misty eats the misty.", "logic": "\nJesting(misty)\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Imbecile(x))\nforall x (Facial(x) -> Indexless(x))\nPlaced(misty) -> Facial(misty)\nforall x (Imbecile(x) and Indexless(x) -> Facial(x))\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Facial(x))\nJesting(misty) -> Placed(misty)\n\nEats(misty, misty)\n\nEats(misty, misty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1633"} {"premises": "Modestia is volcanic. Modestia is bullate. Modestia is ciliary. Suzetta is refulgent. Suzetta is unexpected. Lenora is volcanic. Lenora is ciliary. All volcanic, refulgent things are weepy. If something is insatiable and ciliary then it is weepy. If something is volcanic then it is refulgent. All refulgent, insatiable things are weepy. If something is weepy and bullate then it is unexpected. If Lenora is refulgent then Lenora is unexpected. Suzetta is unexpected.", "logic": "\nVolcanic(modestia)\nBullate(modestia)\nCiliary(modestia)\nRefulgent(suzetta)\nUnexpected(suzetta)\nVolcanic(lenora)\nCiliary(lenora)\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Refulgent(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Insatiable(x) and Ciliary(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) -> Refulgent(x))\nforall x (Refulgent(x) and Insatiable(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) and Bullate(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nRefulgent(lenora) -> Unexpected(lenora)\n\nUnexpected(suzetta)\n\ntherefore Unexpected(suzetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Rolf is genitive. Rolf is sanctified. Rolf is microsomal. Shandra is jubilant. Shandra is calyculate. Alli is genitive. Alli is microsomal. All genitive, jubilant things are boiled. If something is secret and microsomal then it is boiled. If something is genitive then it is jubilant. All jubilant, secret things are boiled. If something is boiled and sanctified then it is calyculate. If Alli is jubilant then Alli is calyculate. Alli is not genitive.", "logic": "\nGenitive(rolf)\nSanctified(rolf)\nMicrosomal(rolf)\nJubilant(shandra)\nCalyculate(shandra)\nGenitive(alli)\nMicrosomal(alli)\nforall x (Genitive(x) and Jubilant(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) and Microsomal(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Genitive(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) and Secret(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Boiled(x) and Sanctified(x) -> Calyculate(x))\nJubilant(alli) -> Calyculate(alli)\n\nnot Genitive(alli)\n\ntherefore Genitive(alli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Joane is romansh. Joane is occluded. Joane is level. Ros is mellowed. Ros is isomeric. Lanna is romansh. Lanna is level. All romansh, mellowed things are sidearm. If something is chewy and level then it is sidearm. If something is romansh then it is mellowed. All mellowed, chewy things are sidearm. If something is sidearm and occluded then it is isomeric. If Lanna is mellowed then Lanna is isomeric. Lanna is mellowed.", "logic": "\nRomansh(joane)\nOccluded(joane)\nLevel(joane)\nMellowed(ros)\nIsomeric(ros)\nRomansh(lanna)\nLevel(lanna)\nforall x (Romansh(x) and Mellowed(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) and Level(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nforall x (Romansh(x) -> Mellowed(x))\nforall x (Mellowed(x) and Chewy(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nforall x (Sidearm(x) and Occluded(x) -> Isomeric(x))\nMellowed(lanna) -> Isomeric(lanna)\n\nMellowed(lanna)\n\nRomansh(lanna) and forall x (Romansh(x) -> Mellowed(x)) -> therefore Mellowed(lanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Stu is rimeless. Stu is insecure. Stu is erose. Lothar is mute. Lothar is aboulic. Seka is rimeless. Seka is erose. All rimeless, mute things are astrocytic. If something is albanian and erose then it is astrocytic. If something is rimeless then it is mute. All mute, albanian things are astrocytic. If something is astrocytic and insecure then it is aboulic. If Seka is mute then Seka is aboulic. Seka is not mute.", "logic": "\nRimeless(stu)\nInsecure(stu)\nErose(stu)\nMute(lothar)\nAboulic(lothar)\nRimeless(seka)\nErose(seka)\nforall x (Rimeless(x) and Mute(x) -> Astrocytic(x))\nforall x (Albanian(x) and Erose(x) -> Astrocytic(x))\nforall x (Rimeless(x) -> Mute(x))\nforall x (Mute(x) and Albanian(x) -> Astrocytic(x))\nforall x (Astrocytic(x) and Insecure(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nMute(seka) -> Aboulic(seka)\n\nnot Mute(seka)\n\nRimeless(seka) and forall x (Rimeless(x) -> Mute(x)) -> therefore Mute(seka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Idaline is ballistic. Idaline is hyaloid. Idaline is blockaded. Madona is unfurrowed. Madona is aspectual. Moses is ballistic. Moses is blockaded. All ballistic, unfurrowed things are algolagnic. If something is fussy and blockaded then it is algolagnic. If something is ballistic then it is unfurrowed. All unfurrowed, fussy things are algolagnic. If something is algolagnic and hyaloid then it is aspectual. If Moses is unfurrowed then Moses is aspectual. Moses is algolagnic.", "logic": "\nBallistic(idaline)\nHyaloid(idaline)\nBlockaded(idaline)\nUnfurrowed(madona)\nAspectual(madona)\nBallistic(moses)\nBlockaded(moses)\nforall x (Ballistic(x) and Unfurrowed(x) -> Algolagnic(x))\nforall x (Fussy(x) and Blockaded(x) -> Algolagnic(x))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Unfurrowed(x))\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) and Fussy(x) -> Algolagnic(x))\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) and Hyaloid(x) -> Aspectual(x))\nUnfurrowed(moses) -> Aspectual(moses)\n\nAlgolagnic(moses)\n\nBallistic(moses) and forall x (Ballistic(x) -> Unfurrowed(x)) -> therefore Unfurrowed(moses) Ballistic(moses) and Unfurrowed(moses) and forall x (Ballistic(x) and Unfurrowed(x) -> Algolagnic(x)) -> therefore Algolagnic(moses)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Goldina is capricious. Goldina is proscribed. Goldina is hebrew. Elihu is draining. Elihu is pleading. Dru is capricious. Dru is hebrew. All capricious, draining things are needless. If something is cogitable and hebrew then it is needless. If something is capricious then it is draining. All draining, cogitable things are needless. If something is needless and proscribed then it is pleading. If Dru is draining then Dru is pleading. Goldina is not needless.", "logic": "\nCapricious(goldina)\nProscribed(goldina)\nHebrew(goldina)\nDraining(elihu)\nPleading(elihu)\nCapricious(dru)\nHebrew(dru)\nforall x (Capricious(x) and Draining(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Cogitable(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Capricious(x) -> Draining(x))\nforall x (Draining(x) and Cogitable(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Needless(x) and Proscribed(x) -> Pleading(x))\nDraining(dru) -> Pleading(dru)\n\nnot Needless(goldina)\n\nCapricious(goldina) and forall x (Capricious(x) -> Draining(x)) -> therefore Draining(goldina) Capricious(goldina) and Draining(goldina) and forall x (Capricious(x) and Draining(x) -> Needless(x)) -> therefore Needless(goldina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Chandal is larboard. Chandal is beaming. Chandal is runproof. Darian is rheologic. Darian is enlivening. Yanaton is larboard. Yanaton is runproof. All larboard, rheologic things are iritic. If something is immutable and runproof then it is iritic. If something is larboard then it is rheologic. All rheologic, immutable things are iritic. If something is iritic and beaming then it is enlivening. If Yanaton is rheologic then Yanaton is enlivening. Darian is not iritic.", "logic": "\nLarboard(chandal)\nBeaming(chandal)\nRunproof(chandal)\nRheologic(darian)\nEnlivening(darian)\nLarboard(yanaton)\nRunproof(yanaton)\nforall x (Larboard(x) and Rheologic(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) and Runproof(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Larboard(x) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Immutable(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) and Beaming(x) -> Enlivening(x))\nRheologic(yanaton) -> Enlivening(yanaton)\n\nnot Iritic(darian)\n\nforall x (Larboard(x) and Rheologic(x) -> Iritic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Fernando is peaty. Fernando is ruttish. Fernando is powerful. Gerladina is adolescent. Gerladina is referable. Nadine is peaty. Nadine is powerful. All peaty, adolescent things are liege. If something is dogging and powerful then it is liege. If something is peaty then it is adolescent. All adolescent, dogging things are liege. If something is liege and ruttish then it is referable. If Nadine is adolescent then Nadine is referable. Gerladina is ruttish.", "logic": "\nPeaty(fernando)\nRuttish(fernando)\nPowerful(fernando)\nAdolescent(gerladina)\nReferable(gerladina)\nPeaty(nadine)\nPowerful(nadine)\nforall x (Peaty(x) and Adolescent(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Dogging(x) and Powerful(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) and Dogging(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Liege(x) and Ruttish(x) -> Referable(x))\nAdolescent(nadine) -> Referable(nadine)\n\nRuttish(gerladina)\n\nRuttish(gerladina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Giles is tart. Giles is denotive. Giles is triploid. Dino is autonomous. Dino is comestible. Roslyn is tart. Roslyn is triploid. All tart, autonomous things are pestering. If something is placable and triploid then it is pestering. If something is tart then it is autonomous. All autonomous, placable things are pestering. If something is pestering and denotive then it is comestible. If Roslyn is autonomous then Roslyn is comestible. Roslyn is not denotive.", "logic": "\nTart(giles)\nDenotive(giles)\nTriploid(giles)\nAutonomous(dino)\nComestible(dino)\nTart(roslyn)\nTriploid(roslyn)\nforall x (Tart(x) and Autonomous(x) -> Pestering(x))\nforall x (Placable(x) and Triploid(x) -> Pestering(x))\nforall x (Tart(x) -> Autonomous(x))\nforall x (Autonomous(x) and Placable(x) -> Pestering(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) and Denotive(x) -> Comestible(x))\nAutonomous(roslyn) -> Comestible(roslyn)\n\nnot Denotive(roslyn)\n\nnot Denotive(roslyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Juan is southward. Juan is obligatory. Juan is boffo. Frederica is somatic. Frederica is grizzled. Madelena is southward. Madelena is boffo. All southward, somatic things are trussed. If something is coloured and boffo then it is trussed. If something is southward then it is somatic. All somatic, coloured things are trussed. If something is trussed and obligatory then it is grizzled. If Madelena is somatic then Madelena is grizzled. Madelena is coloured.", "logic": "\nSouthward(juan)\nObligatory(juan)\nBoffo(juan)\nSomatic(frederica)\nGrizzled(frederica)\nSouthward(madelena)\nBoffo(madelena)\nforall x (Southward(x) and Somatic(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Coloured(x) and Boffo(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Southward(x) -> Somatic(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) and Coloured(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) and Obligatory(x) -> Grizzled(x))\nSomatic(madelena) -> Grizzled(madelena)\n\nColoured(madelena)\n\nColoured(madelena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Elizabeth is undefiled. Elizabeth is muddy. Elizabeth is advertent. Moses is deluxe. Moses is adulterine. Meg is undefiled. Meg is advertent. All undefiled, deluxe things are quixotic. If something is individual and advertent then it is quixotic. If something is undefiled then it is deluxe. All deluxe, individual things are quixotic. If something is quixotic and muddy then it is adulterine. If Meg is deluxe then Meg is adulterine. Moses is not advertent.", "logic": "\nUndefiled(elizabeth)\nMuddy(elizabeth)\nAdvertent(elizabeth)\nDeluxe(moses)\nAdulterine(moses)\nUndefiled(meg)\nAdvertent(meg)\nforall x (Undefiled(x) and Deluxe(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) and Advertent(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Undefiled(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) and Individual(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Quixotic(x) and Muddy(x) -> Adulterine(x))\nDeluxe(meg) -> Adulterine(meg)\n\nnot Advertent(moses)\n\nnot Advertent(moses) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Theada is outermost. Theada is labiate. Theada is referable. Tawnya is gleaming. Tawnya is anti. Joelie is outermost. Joelie is referable. All outermost, gleaming things are tight. If something is lamenting and referable then it is tight. If something is outermost then it is gleaming. All gleaming, lamenting things are tight. If something is tight and labiate then it is anti. If Joelie is gleaming then Joelie is anti. Theada is lamenting.", "logic": "\nOutermost(theada)\nLabiate(theada)\nReferable(theada)\nGleaming(tawnya)\nAnti(tawnya)\nOutermost(joelie)\nReferable(joelie)\nforall x (Outermost(x) and Gleaming(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Lamenting(x) and Referable(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Outermost(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Lamenting(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and Labiate(x) -> Anti(x))\nGleaming(joelie) -> Anti(joelie)\n\nLamenting(theada)\n\nLamenting(theada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1346"} {"premises": "Gershom is unresolved. Gershom is neural. Gershom is newfound. Gershom is financial. Gershom is exemplary. Stanley is neural. Stanley is nonporous. All newfound people are exemplary. All nonporous people are newfound. Stanley is neural.", "logic": "\nUnresolved(gershom)\nNeural(gershom)\nNewfound(gershom)\nFinancial(gershom)\nExemplary(gershom)\nNeural(stanley)\nNonporous(stanley)\nforall x (Newfound(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Nonporous(x) -> Newfound(x))\n\nNeural(stanley)\n\ntherefore Neural(stanley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Keri is seaward. Keri is carousing. Keri is whiney. Keri is lone. Keri is banned. Edmond is carousing. Edmond is glowing. All whiney people are banned. All glowing people are whiney. Keri is not lone.", "logic": "\nSeaward(keri)\nCarousing(keri)\nWhiney(keri)\nLone(keri)\nBanned(keri)\nCarousing(edmond)\nGlowing(edmond)\nforall x (Whiney(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Whiney(x))\n\nnot Lone(keri)\n\ntherefore Lone(keri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Rubina is barbarous. Rubina is built. Rubina is xcii. Rubina is braised. Rubina is acronymous. Marc is built. Marc is aroid. All xcii people are acronymous. All aroid people are xcii. Marc is xcii.", "logic": "\nBarbarous(rubina)\nBuilt(rubina)\nXcii(rubina)\nBraised(rubina)\nAcronymous(rubina)\nBuilt(marc)\nAroid(marc)\nforall x (Xcii(x) -> Acronymous(x))\nforall x (Aroid(x) -> Xcii(x))\n\nXcii(marc)\n\nAroid(marc) and forall x (Aroid(x) -> Xcii(x)) -> therefore Xcii(marc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Tiphanie is perfumed. Tiphanie is christly. Tiphanie is polysemous. Tiphanie is uncurled. Tiphanie is stated. Piet is christly. Piet is thorny. All polysemous people are stated. All thorny people are polysemous. Piet is not polysemous.", "logic": "\nPerfumed(tiphanie)\nChristly(tiphanie)\nPolysemous(tiphanie)\nUncurled(tiphanie)\nStated(tiphanie)\nChristly(piet)\nThorny(piet)\nforall x (Polysemous(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (Thorny(x) -> Polysemous(x))\n\nnot Polysemous(piet)\n\nThorny(piet) and forall x (Thorny(x) -> Polysemous(x)) -> therefore Polysemous(piet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Cele is tropical. Cele is ordered. Cele is passerine. Cele is caucasoid. Cele is sceptred. Leila is ordered. Leila is comose. All passerine people are sceptred. All comose people are passerine. Leila is sceptred.", "logic": "\nTropical(cele)\nOrdered(cele)\nPasserine(cele)\nCaucasoid(cele)\nSceptred(cele)\nOrdered(leila)\nComose(leila)\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Comose(x) -> Passerine(x))\n\nSceptred(leila)\n\nComose(leila) and forall x (Comose(x) -> Passerine(x)) -> therefore Passerine(leila) Passerine(leila) and forall x (Passerine(x) -> Sceptred(x)) -> therefore Sceptred(leila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Corinna is memberless. Corinna is grueling. Corinna is cannular. Corinna is resinous. Corinna is invalid. Eden is grueling. Eden is drowsy. All cannular people are invalid. All drowsy people are cannular. Eden is not invalid.", "logic": "\nMemberless(corinna)\nGrueling(corinna)\nCannular(corinna)\nResinous(corinna)\nInvalid(corinna)\nGrueling(eden)\nDrowsy(eden)\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) -> Cannular(x))\n\nnot Invalid(eden)\n\nDrowsy(eden) and forall x (Drowsy(x) -> Cannular(x)) -> therefore Cannular(eden) Cannular(eden) and forall x (Cannular(x) -> Invalid(x)) -> therefore Invalid(eden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Pippa is infamous. Pippa is bionomic. Pippa is unpillared. Pippa is rickety. Pippa is moonlike. Fiorenze is bionomic. Fiorenze is mordacious. All unpillared people are moonlike. All mordacious people are unpillared. Fiorenze is not quiet.", "logic": "\nInfamous(pippa)\nBionomic(pippa)\nUnpillared(pippa)\nRickety(pippa)\nMoonlike(pippa)\nBionomic(fiorenze)\nMordacious(fiorenze)\nforall x (Unpillared(x) -> Moonlike(x))\nforall x (Mordacious(x) -> Unpillared(x))\n\nnot Quiet(fiorenze)\n\nnot Quiet(fiorenze) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Celeste is nativistic. Celeste is mansard. Celeste is ideal. Celeste is autologous. Celeste is ballistic. Humbert is mansard. Humbert is sneaking. All ideal people are ballistic. All sneaking people are ideal. Humbert is nativistic.", "logic": "\nNativistic(celeste)\nMansard(celeste)\nIdeal(celeste)\nAutologous(celeste)\nBallistic(celeste)\nMansard(humbert)\nSneaking(humbert)\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Ideal(x))\n\nNativistic(humbert)\n\nNativistic(humbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Auroora is unpierced. Auroora is reconciled. Auroora is anchoritic. Auroora is lapsed. Auroora is iron. Tandie is reconciled. Tandie is getatable. All anchoritic people are iron. All getatable people are anchoritic. Auroora is not getatable.", "logic": "\nUnpierced(auroora)\nReconciled(auroora)\nAnchoritic(auroora)\nLapsed(auroora)\nIron(auroora)\nReconciled(tandie)\nGetatable(tandie)\nforall x (Anchoritic(x) -> Iron(x))\nforall x (Getatable(x) -> Anchoritic(x))\n\nnot Getatable(auroora)\n\nnot Getatable(auroora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Eduard is cubic. Eduard is horned. Eduard is choosey. Eduard is icebound. Eduard is binomial. Modestia is horned. Modestia is anodyne. All choosey people are binomial. All anodyne people are choosey. Modestia is icebound.", "logic": "\nCubic(eduard)\nHorned(eduard)\nChoosey(eduard)\nIcebound(eduard)\nBinomial(eduard)\nHorned(modestia)\nAnodyne(modestia)\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Binomial(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Choosey(x))\n\nIcebound(modestia)\n\nIcebound(modestia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2316"} {"premises": "Katharine is fascist. Katharine is lxvi. Katharine is dipylon. Kalle is fascist. Kalle is awnless. Kalle is expectant. Kalle is dipylon. If someone is awnless then they are maximal. All maximal people are rationed. All rationed, awnless people are dipylon. If someone is dipylon then they are expectant. Smart, rationed people are maximal. All expectant, fascist people are rationed. If Katharine is maximal then Katharine is fascist. If someone is awnless then they are fascist. Katharine is dipylon.", "logic": "\nFascist(katharine)\nLxvi(katharine)\nDipylon(katharine)\nFascist(kalle)\nAwnless(kalle)\nExpectant(kalle)\nDipylon(kalle)\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Maximal(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) -> Rationed(x))\nforall x (Rationed(x) and Awnless(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) -> Expectant(x))\nforall x (Expectant(x) and Rationed(x) -> Maximal(x))\nforall x (Expectant(x) and Fascist(x) -> Rationed(x))\nMaximal(katharine) -> Fascist(katharine)\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Fascist(x))\n\nDipylon(katharine)\n\ntherefore Dipylon(katharine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Nisa is phlegmy. Nisa is luscious. Nisa is askew. Bryana is phlegmy. Bryana is soprano. Bryana is apotropaic. Bryana is askew. If someone is soprano then they are braggart. All braggart people are improving. All improving, soprano people are askew. If someone is askew then they are apotropaic. Smart, improving people are braggart. All apotropaic, phlegmy people are improving. If Nisa is braggart then Nisa is phlegmy. If someone is soprano then they are phlegmy. Bryana is not soprano.", "logic": "\nPhlegmy(nisa)\nLuscious(nisa)\nAskew(nisa)\nPhlegmy(bryana)\nSoprano(bryana)\nApotropaic(bryana)\nAskew(bryana)\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> Braggart(x))\nforall x (Braggart(x) -> Improving(x))\nforall x (Improving(x) and Soprano(x) -> Askew(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\nforall x (Apotropaic(x) and Improving(x) -> Braggart(x))\nforall x (Apotropaic(x) and Phlegmy(x) -> Improving(x))\nBraggart(nisa) -> Phlegmy(nisa)\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\n\nnot Soprano(bryana)\n\ntherefore Soprano(bryana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Glynn is unarmed. Glynn is corded. Glynn is surreal. Robert is unarmed. Robert is orbitual. Robert is drenched. Robert is surreal. If someone is orbitual then they are haploid. All haploid people are smoggy. All smoggy, orbitual people are surreal. If someone is surreal then they are drenched. Smart, smoggy people are haploid. All drenched, unarmed people are smoggy. If Glynn is haploid then Glynn is unarmed. If someone is orbitual then they are unarmed. Glynn is drenched.", "logic": "\nUnarmed(glynn)\nCorded(glynn)\nSurreal(glynn)\nUnarmed(robert)\nOrbitual(robert)\nDrenched(robert)\nSurreal(robert)\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Haploid(x))\nforall x (Haploid(x) -> Smoggy(x))\nforall x (Smoggy(x) and Orbitual(x) -> Surreal(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Drenched(x))\nforall x (Drenched(x) and Smoggy(x) -> Haploid(x))\nforall x (Drenched(x) and Unarmed(x) -> Smoggy(x))\nHaploid(glynn) -> Unarmed(glynn)\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Unarmed(x))\n\nDrenched(glynn)\n\nSurreal(glynn) and forall x (Surreal(x) -> Drenched(x)) -> therefore Drenched(glynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Pammy is plucky. Pammy is frosted. Pammy is plane. Freemon is plucky. Freemon is isomeric. Freemon is dashing. Freemon is plane. If someone is isomeric then they are west. All west people are bootless. All bootless, isomeric people are plane. If someone is plane then they are dashing. Smart, bootless people are west. All dashing, plucky people are bootless. If Pammy is west then Pammy is plucky. If someone is isomeric then they are plucky. Pammy is not dashing.", "logic": "\nPlucky(pammy)\nFrosted(pammy)\nPlane(pammy)\nPlucky(freemon)\nIsomeric(freemon)\nDashing(freemon)\nPlane(freemon)\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> West(x))\nforall x (West(x) -> Bootless(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Plane(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) and Bootless(x) -> West(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) and Plucky(x) -> Bootless(x))\nWest(pammy) -> Plucky(pammy)\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Plucky(x))\n\nnot Dashing(pammy)\n\nPlane(pammy) and forall x (Plane(x) -> Dashing(x)) -> therefore Dashing(pammy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Grady is bilabial. Grady is warlike. Grady is diabolical. Saree is bilabial. Saree is yummy. Saree is several. Saree is diabolical. If someone is yummy then they are whirring. All whirring people are unheaded. All unheaded, yummy people are diabolical. If someone is diabolical then they are several. Smart, unheaded people are whirring. All several, bilabial people are unheaded. If Grady is whirring then Grady is bilabial. If someone is yummy then they are bilabial. Grady is unheaded.", "logic": "\nBilabial(grady)\nWarlike(grady)\nDiabolical(grady)\nBilabial(saree)\nYummy(saree)\nSeveral(saree)\nDiabolical(saree)\nforall x (Yummy(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Whirring(x) -> Unheaded(x))\nforall x (Unheaded(x) and Yummy(x) -> Diabolical(x))\nforall x (Diabolical(x) -> Several(x))\nforall x (Several(x) and Unheaded(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Several(x) and Bilabial(x) -> Unheaded(x))\nWhirring(grady) -> Bilabial(grady)\nforall x (Yummy(x) -> Bilabial(x))\n\nUnheaded(grady)\n\nDiabolical(grady) and forall x (Diabolical(x) -> Several(x)) -> therefore Several(grady) Several(grady) and Bilabial(grady) and forall x (Several(x) and Bilabial(x) -> Unheaded(x)) -> therefore Unheaded(grady)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Rozanne is resinous. Rozanne is repeatable. Rozanne is tumid. Derick is resinous. Derick is relieved. Derick is energising. Derick is tumid. If someone is relieved then they are frightened. All frightened people are flip. All flip, relieved people are tumid. If someone is tumid then they are energising. Smart, flip people are frightened. All energising, resinous people are flip. If Rozanne is frightened then Rozanne is resinous. If someone is relieved then they are resinous. Rozanne is not flip.", "logic": "\nResinous(rozanne)\nRepeatable(rozanne)\nTumid(rozanne)\nResinous(derick)\nRelieved(derick)\nEnergising(derick)\nTumid(derick)\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Flip(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) and Relieved(x) -> Tumid(x))\nforall x (Tumid(x) -> Energising(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) and Flip(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) and Resinous(x) -> Flip(x))\nFrightened(rozanne) -> Resinous(rozanne)\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Resinous(x))\n\nnot Flip(rozanne)\n\nTumid(rozanne) and forall x (Tumid(x) -> Energising(x)) -> therefore Energising(rozanne) Energising(rozanne) and Resinous(rozanne) and forall x (Energising(x) and Resinous(x) -> Flip(x)) -> therefore Flip(rozanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Paige is horrible. Paige is frivolous. Paige is stearic. Kimmi is horrible. Kimmi is vowellike. Kimmi is alpestrine. Kimmi is stearic. If someone is vowellike then they are yeastlike. All yeastlike people are informal. All informal, vowellike people are stearic. If someone is stearic then they are alpestrine. Smart, informal people are yeastlike. All alpestrine, horrible people are informal. If Paige is yeastlike then Paige is horrible. If someone is vowellike then they are horrible. Kimmi is not frivolous.", "logic": "\nHorrible(paige)\nFrivolous(paige)\nStearic(paige)\nHorrible(kimmi)\nVowellike(kimmi)\nAlpestrine(kimmi)\nStearic(kimmi)\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Yeastlike(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) and Vowellike(x) -> Stearic(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Alpestrine(x) and Informal(x) -> Yeastlike(x))\nforall x (Alpestrine(x) and Horrible(x) -> Informal(x))\nYeastlike(paige) -> Horrible(paige)\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Horrible(x))\n\nnot Frivolous(kimmi)\n\nnot Frivolous(kimmi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Trescha is hebraic. Trescha is pantheist. Trescha is actuated. Emmalee is hebraic. Emmalee is impendent. Emmalee is savourless. Emmalee is actuated. If someone is impendent then they are insectan. All insectan people are unlogical. All unlogical, impendent people are actuated. If someone is actuated then they are savourless. Smart, unlogical people are insectan. All savourless, hebraic people are unlogical. If Trescha is insectan then Trescha is hebraic. If someone is impendent then they are hebraic. Trescha is impendent.", "logic": "\nHebraic(trescha)\nPantheist(trescha)\nActuated(trescha)\nHebraic(emmalee)\nImpendent(emmalee)\nSavourless(emmalee)\nActuated(emmalee)\nforall x (Impendent(x) -> Insectan(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) and Impendent(x) -> Actuated(x))\nforall x (Actuated(x) -> Savourless(x))\nforall x (Savourless(x) and Unlogical(x) -> Insectan(x))\nforall x (Savourless(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nInsectan(trescha) -> Hebraic(trescha)\nforall x (Impendent(x) -> Hebraic(x))\n\nImpendent(trescha)\n\nImpendent(trescha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "The leonerd is dateless. The leonerd is amerindic. The leonerd mismate the shelagh. The leonerd subtilise the shelagh. The shelagh freckle the leonerd. The shelagh is dateless. The shelagh is mismated. The shelagh is ignescent. The shelagh is forficate. The shelagh is amerindic. The shelagh mismate the leonerd. The shelagh subtilise the leonerd. If the leonerd is forficate then the leonerd mismate the shelagh. If someone mismate the shelagh and the shelagh subtilise the leonerd then they eat the shelagh. If someone freckle the shelagh and the shelagh freckle the leonerd then the leonerd mismate the shelagh. If someone is mismated then they need the leonerd. If someone freckle the leonerd and the leonerd subtilise the shelagh then they eat the shelagh. Young people are mismated. If someone is mismated and amerindic then they eat the shelagh. If someone freckle the leonerd and they need the shelagh then the leonerd subtilise the shelagh. The shelagh is ignescent.", "logic": "\nDateless(leonerd)\nAmerindic(leonerd)\nMismate(leonerd, shelagh)\nSubtilise(leonerd, shelagh)\nFreckle(shelagh, leonerd)\nDateless(shelagh)\nMismated(shelagh)\nIgnescent(shelagh)\nForficate(shelagh)\nAmerindic(shelagh)\nMismate(shelagh, leonerd)\nSubtilise(shelagh, leonerd)\nForficate(leonerd) -> Mismate(leonerd, shelagh)\nforall x (Mismate(x, shelagh) and Subtilise(shelagh, leonerd) -> Freckle(x, shelagh))\nforall x (Freckle(x, shelagh) and Freckle(shelagh, leonerd) -> Mismate(leonerd, shelagh))\nforall x (Mismated(x) -> Subtilise(x, leonerd))\nforall x (Freckle(x, leonerd) and Subtilise(leonerd, shelagh) -> Freckle(x, shelagh))\nforall x (Amerindic(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) and Amerindic(x) -> Freckle(x, shelagh))\nforall x (Freckle(x, leonerd) and Subtilise(x, shelagh) -> Subtilise(leonerd, shelagh))\n\nIgnescent(shelagh)\n\ntherefore Ignescent(shelagh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The annabal is algonquin. The annabal is jingoistic. The annabal lust the mirabel. The annabal pressurise the mirabel. The mirabel overbear the annabal. The mirabel is algonquin. The mirabel is algonquian. The mirabel is chockful. The mirabel is innoxious. The mirabel is jingoistic. The mirabel lust the annabal. The mirabel pressurise the annabal. If the annabal is innoxious then the annabal lust the mirabel. If someone lust the mirabel and the mirabel pressurise the annabal then they eat the mirabel. If someone overbear the mirabel and the mirabel overbear the annabal then the annabal lust the mirabel. If someone is algonquian then they need the annabal. If someone overbear the annabal and the annabal pressurise the mirabel then they eat the mirabel. Young people are algonquian. If someone is algonquian and jingoistic then they eat the mirabel. If someone overbear the annabal and they need the mirabel then the annabal pressurise the mirabel. The annabal does not like the mirabel.", "logic": "\nAlgonquin(annabal)\nJingoistic(annabal)\nLust(annabal, mirabel)\nPressurise(annabal, mirabel)\nOverbear(mirabel, annabal)\nAlgonquin(mirabel)\nAlgonquian(mirabel)\nChockful(mirabel)\nInnoxious(mirabel)\nJingoistic(mirabel)\nLust(mirabel, annabal)\nPressurise(mirabel, annabal)\nInnoxious(annabal) -> Lust(annabal, mirabel)\nforall x (Lust(x, mirabel) and Pressurise(mirabel, annabal) -> Overbear(x, mirabel))\nforall x (Overbear(x, mirabel) and Overbear(mirabel, annabal) -> Lust(annabal, mirabel))\nforall x (Algonquian(x) -> Pressurise(x, annabal))\nforall x (Overbear(x, annabal) and Pressurise(annabal, mirabel) -> Overbear(x, mirabel))\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) -> Algonquian(x))\nforall x (Algonquian(x) and Jingoistic(x) -> Overbear(x, mirabel))\nforall x (Overbear(x, annabal) and Pressurise(x, mirabel) -> Pressurise(annabal, mirabel))\n\nnot Lust(annabal, mirabel)\n\ntherefore Lust(annabal, mirabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The reid is infrared. The reid is upward. The reid overdose the helaina. The reid epoxy the helaina. The helaina broider the reid. The helaina is infrared. The helaina is malawian. The helaina is sapphirine. The helaina is unnameable. The helaina is upward. The helaina overdose the reid. The helaina epoxy the reid. If the reid is unnameable then the reid overdose the helaina. If someone overdose the helaina and the helaina epoxy the reid then they eat the helaina. If someone broider the helaina and the helaina broider the reid then the reid overdose the helaina. If someone is malawian then they need the reid. If someone broider the reid and the reid epoxy the helaina then they eat the helaina. Young people are malawian. If someone is malawian and upward then they eat the helaina. If someone broider the reid and they need the helaina then the reid epoxy the helaina. The reid is malawian.", "logic": "\nInfrared(reid)\nUpward(reid)\nOverdose(reid, helaina)\nEpoxy(reid, helaina)\nBroider(helaina, reid)\nInfrared(helaina)\nMalawian(helaina)\nSapphirine(helaina)\nUnnameable(helaina)\nUpward(helaina)\nOverdose(helaina, reid)\nEpoxy(helaina, reid)\nUnnameable(reid) -> Overdose(reid, helaina)\nforall x (Overdose(x, helaina) and Epoxy(helaina, reid) -> Broider(x, helaina))\nforall x (Broider(x, helaina) and Broider(helaina, reid) -> Overdose(reid, helaina))\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Epoxy(x, reid))\nforall x (Broider(x, reid) and Epoxy(reid, helaina) -> Broider(x, helaina))\nforall x (Upward(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Malawian(x) and Upward(x) -> Broider(x, helaina))\nforall x (Broider(x, reid) and Epoxy(x, helaina) -> Epoxy(reid, helaina))\n\nMalawian(reid)\n\nUpward(reid) and forall x (Upward(x) -> Malawian(x)) -> therefore Malawian(reid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The elwira is boastful. The elwira is hysterical. The elwira crack the emmaline. The elwira hiss the emmaline. The emmaline legitimate the elwira. The emmaline is boastful. The emmaline is exalted. The emmaline is sinless. The emmaline is incredible. The emmaline is hysterical. The emmaline crack the elwira. The emmaline hiss the elwira. If the elwira is incredible then the elwira crack the emmaline. If someone crack the emmaline and the emmaline hiss the elwira then they eat the emmaline. If someone legitimate the emmaline and the emmaline legitimate the elwira then the elwira crack the emmaline. If someone is exalted then they need the elwira. If someone legitimate the elwira and the elwira hiss the emmaline then they eat the emmaline. Young people are exalted. If someone is exalted and hysterical then they eat the emmaline. If someone legitimate the elwira and they need the emmaline then the elwira hiss the emmaline. The elwira is not exalted.", "logic": "\nBoastful(elwira)\nHysterical(elwira)\nCrack(elwira, emmaline)\nHiss(elwira, emmaline)\nLegitimate(emmaline, elwira)\nBoastful(emmaline)\nExalted(emmaline)\nSinless(emmaline)\nIncredible(emmaline)\nHysterical(emmaline)\nCrack(emmaline, elwira)\nHiss(emmaline, elwira)\nIncredible(elwira) -> Crack(elwira, emmaline)\nforall x (Crack(x, emmaline) and Hiss(emmaline, elwira) -> Legitimate(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Legitimate(x, emmaline) and Legitimate(emmaline, elwira) -> Crack(elwira, emmaline))\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Hiss(x, elwira))\nforall x (Legitimate(x, elwira) and Hiss(elwira, emmaline) -> Legitimate(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Hysterical(x) -> Exalted(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) and Hysterical(x) -> Legitimate(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Legitimate(x, elwira) and Hiss(x, emmaline) -> Hiss(elwira, emmaline))\n\nnot Exalted(elwira)\n\nHysterical(elwira) and forall x (Hysterical(x) -> Exalted(x)) -> therefore Exalted(elwira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The michele is facile. The michele is indirect. The michele lather the lynett. The michele bowl the lynett. The lynett dawdle the michele. The lynett is facile. The lynett is ineligible. The lynett is backstair. The lynett is deceased. The lynett is indirect. The lynett lather the michele. The lynett bowl the michele. If the michele is deceased then the michele lather the lynett. If someone lather the lynett and the lynett bowl the michele then they eat the lynett. If someone dawdle the lynett and the lynett dawdle the michele then the michele lather the lynett. If someone is ineligible then they need the michele. If someone dawdle the michele and the michele bowl the lynett then they eat the lynett. Young people are ineligible. If someone is ineligible and indirect then they eat the lynett. If someone dawdle the michele and they need the lynett then the michele bowl the lynett. The michele bowl the michele.", "logic": "\nFacile(michele)\nIndirect(michele)\nLather(michele, lynett)\nBowl(michele, lynett)\nDawdle(lynett, michele)\nFacile(lynett)\nIneligible(lynett)\nBackstair(lynett)\nDeceased(lynett)\nIndirect(lynett)\nLather(lynett, michele)\nBowl(lynett, michele)\nDeceased(michele) -> Lather(michele, lynett)\nforall x (Lather(x, lynett) and Bowl(lynett, michele) -> Dawdle(x, lynett))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, lynett) and Dawdle(lynett, michele) -> Lather(michele, lynett))\nforall x (Ineligible(x) -> Bowl(x, michele))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, michele) and Bowl(michele, lynett) -> Dawdle(x, lynett))\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> Ineligible(x))\nforall x (Ineligible(x) and Indirect(x) -> Dawdle(x, lynett))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, michele) and Bowl(x, lynett) -> Bowl(michele, lynett))\n\nBowl(michele, michele)\n\nIndirect(michele) and forall x (Indirect(x) -> Ineligible(x)) -> therefore Ineligible(michele) Ineligible(michele) and forall x (Ineligible(x) -> Bowl(x, michele)) -> therefore Bowl(michele, michele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The tucky is stubbly. The tucky is corded. The tucky capsule the wren. The tucky devolve the wren. The wren outwit the tucky. The wren is stubbly. The wren is fistulate. The wren is dialectal. The wren is turkmen. The wren is corded. The wren capsule the tucky. The wren devolve the tucky. If the tucky is turkmen then the tucky capsule the wren. If someone capsule the wren and the wren devolve the tucky then they eat the wren. If someone outwit the wren and the wren outwit the tucky then the tucky capsule the wren. If someone is fistulate then they need the tucky. If someone outwit the tucky and the tucky devolve the wren then they eat the wren. Young people are fistulate. If someone is fistulate and corded then they eat the wren. If someone outwit the tucky and they need the wren then the tucky devolve the wren. The tucky does not need the tucky.", "logic": "\nStubbly(tucky)\nCorded(tucky)\nCapsule(tucky, wren)\nDevolve(tucky, wren)\nOutwit(wren, tucky)\nStubbly(wren)\nFistulate(wren)\nDialectal(wren)\nTurkmen(wren)\nCorded(wren)\nCapsule(wren, tucky)\nDevolve(wren, tucky)\nTurkmen(tucky) -> Capsule(tucky, wren)\nforall x (Capsule(x, wren) and Devolve(wren, tucky) -> Outwit(x, wren))\nforall x (Outwit(x, wren) and Outwit(wren, tucky) -> Capsule(tucky, wren))\nforall x (Fistulate(x) -> Devolve(x, tucky))\nforall x (Outwit(x, tucky) and Devolve(tucky, wren) -> Outwit(x, wren))\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Fistulate(x))\nforall x (Fistulate(x) and Corded(x) -> Outwit(x, wren))\nforall x (Outwit(x, tucky) and Devolve(x, wren) -> Devolve(tucky, wren))\n\nnot Devolve(tucky, tucky)\n\nCorded(tucky) and forall x (Corded(x) -> Fistulate(x)) -> therefore Fistulate(tucky) Fistulate(tucky) and forall x (Fistulate(x) -> Devolve(x, tucky)) -> therefore Devolve(tucky, tucky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The mallissa is pedigreed. The mallissa is bermudan. The mallissa weave the olivia. The mallissa decalcify the olivia. The olivia menstruate the mallissa. The olivia is pedigreed. The olivia is sundried. The olivia is undefined. The olivia is apneic. The olivia is bermudan. The olivia weave the mallissa. The olivia decalcify the mallissa. If the mallissa is apneic then the mallissa weave the olivia. If someone weave the olivia and the olivia decalcify the mallissa then they eat the olivia. If someone menstruate the olivia and the olivia menstruate the mallissa then the mallissa weave the olivia. If someone is sundried then they need the mallissa. If someone menstruate the mallissa and the mallissa decalcify the olivia then they eat the olivia. Young people are sundried. If someone is sundried and bermudan then they eat the olivia. If someone menstruate the mallissa and they need the olivia then the mallissa decalcify the olivia. The olivia does not like the olivia.", "logic": "\nPedigreed(mallissa)\nBermudan(mallissa)\nWeave(mallissa, olivia)\nDecalcify(mallissa, olivia)\nMenstruate(olivia, mallissa)\nPedigreed(olivia)\nSundried(olivia)\nUndefined(olivia)\nApneic(olivia)\nBermudan(olivia)\nWeave(olivia, mallissa)\nDecalcify(olivia, mallissa)\nApneic(mallissa) -> Weave(mallissa, olivia)\nforall x (Weave(x, olivia) and Decalcify(olivia, mallissa) -> Menstruate(x, olivia))\nforall x (Menstruate(x, olivia) and Menstruate(olivia, mallissa) -> Weave(mallissa, olivia))\nforall x (Sundried(x) -> Decalcify(x, mallissa))\nforall x (Menstruate(x, mallissa) and Decalcify(mallissa, olivia) -> Menstruate(x, olivia))\nforall x (Bermudan(x) -> Sundried(x))\nforall x (Sundried(x) and Bermudan(x) -> Menstruate(x, olivia))\nforall x (Menstruate(x, mallissa) and Decalcify(x, olivia) -> Decalcify(mallissa, olivia))\n\nnot Weave(olivia, olivia)\n\nnot Weave(olivia, olivia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The reynold is twisty. The reynold is dental. The reynold ream the jennee. The reynold fraternize the jennee. The jennee unfold the reynold. The jennee is twisty. The jennee is volumed. The jennee is saprobic. The jennee is esthetical. The jennee is dental. The jennee ream the reynold. The jennee fraternize the reynold. If the reynold is esthetical then the reynold ream the jennee. If someone ream the jennee and the jennee fraternize the reynold then they eat the jennee. If someone unfold the jennee and the jennee unfold the reynold then the reynold ream the jennee. If someone is volumed then they need the reynold. If someone unfold the reynold and the reynold fraternize the jennee then they eat the jennee. Young people are volumed. If someone is volumed and dental then they eat the jennee. If someone unfold the reynold and they need the jennee then the reynold fraternize the jennee. The reynold unfold the reynold.", "logic": "\nTwisty(reynold)\nDental(reynold)\nReam(reynold, jennee)\nFraternize(reynold, jennee)\nUnfold(jennee, reynold)\nTwisty(jennee)\nVolumed(jennee)\nSaprobic(jennee)\nEsthetical(jennee)\nDental(jennee)\nReam(jennee, reynold)\nFraternize(jennee, reynold)\nEsthetical(reynold) -> Ream(reynold, jennee)\nforall x (Ream(x, jennee) and Fraternize(jennee, reynold) -> Unfold(x, jennee))\nforall x (Unfold(x, jennee) and Unfold(jennee, reynold) -> Ream(reynold, jennee))\nforall x (Volumed(x) -> Fraternize(x, reynold))\nforall x (Unfold(x, reynold) and Fraternize(reynold, jennee) -> Unfold(x, jennee))\nforall x (Dental(x) -> Volumed(x))\nforall x (Volumed(x) and Dental(x) -> Unfold(x, jennee))\nforall x (Unfold(x, reynold) and Fraternize(x, jennee) -> Fraternize(reynold, jennee))\n\nUnfold(reynold, reynold)\n\nUnfold(reynold, reynold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The marlene is harried. The marlene is thumbed. The marlene exhilarate the felecia. The marlene putty the felecia. The felecia ticktack the marlene. The felecia is harried. The felecia is netlike. The felecia is wormy. The felecia is bumpkinly. The felecia is thumbed. The felecia exhilarate the marlene. The felecia putty the marlene. If the marlene is bumpkinly then the marlene exhilarate the felecia. If someone exhilarate the felecia and the felecia putty the marlene then they eat the felecia. If someone ticktack the felecia and the felecia ticktack the marlene then the marlene exhilarate the felecia. If someone is netlike then they need the marlene. If someone ticktack the marlene and the marlene putty the felecia then they eat the felecia. Young people are netlike. If someone is netlike and thumbed then they eat the felecia. If someone ticktack the marlene and they need the felecia then the marlene putty the felecia. The marlene does not like the marlene.", "logic": "\nHarried(marlene)\nThumbed(marlene)\nExhilarate(marlene, felecia)\nPutty(marlene, felecia)\nTicktack(felecia, marlene)\nHarried(felecia)\nNetlike(felecia)\nWormy(felecia)\nBumpkinly(felecia)\nThumbed(felecia)\nExhilarate(felecia, marlene)\nPutty(felecia, marlene)\nBumpkinly(marlene) -> Exhilarate(marlene, felecia)\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, felecia) and Putty(felecia, marlene) -> Ticktack(x, felecia))\nforall x (Ticktack(x, felecia) and Ticktack(felecia, marlene) -> Exhilarate(marlene, felecia))\nforall x (Netlike(x) -> Putty(x, marlene))\nforall x (Ticktack(x, marlene) and Putty(marlene, felecia) -> Ticktack(x, felecia))\nforall x (Thumbed(x) -> Netlike(x))\nforall x (Netlike(x) and Thumbed(x) -> Ticktack(x, felecia))\nforall x (Ticktack(x, marlene) and Putty(x, felecia) -> Putty(marlene, felecia))\n\nnot Exhilarate(marlene, marlene)\n\nnot Exhilarate(marlene, marlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The worden is rocky. The worden is unrefined. The worden overcrowd the lily. The worden vellicate the lily. The lily scandalize the worden. The lily is rocky. The lily is valorous. The lily is lone. The lily is fated. The lily is unrefined. The lily overcrowd the worden. The lily vellicate the worden. If the worden is fated then the worden overcrowd the lily. If someone overcrowd the lily and the lily vellicate the worden then they eat the lily. If someone scandalize the lily and the lily scandalize the worden then the worden overcrowd the lily. If someone is valorous then they need the worden. If someone scandalize the worden and the worden vellicate the lily then they eat the lily. Young people are valorous. If someone is valorous and unrefined then they eat the lily. If someone scandalize the worden and they need the lily then the worden vellicate the lily. The lily vellicate the lily.", "logic": "\nRocky(worden)\nUnrefined(worden)\nOvercrowd(worden, lily)\nVellicate(worden, lily)\nScandalize(lily, worden)\nRocky(lily)\nValorous(lily)\nLone(lily)\nFated(lily)\nUnrefined(lily)\nOvercrowd(lily, worden)\nVellicate(lily, worden)\nFated(worden) -> Overcrowd(worden, lily)\nforall x (Overcrowd(x, lily) and Vellicate(lily, worden) -> Scandalize(x, lily))\nforall x (Scandalize(x, lily) and Scandalize(lily, worden) -> Overcrowd(worden, lily))\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> Vellicate(x, worden))\nforall x (Scandalize(x, worden) and Vellicate(worden, lily) -> Scandalize(x, lily))\nforall x (Unrefined(x) -> Valorous(x))\nforall x (Valorous(x) and Unrefined(x) -> Scandalize(x, lily))\nforall x (Scandalize(x, worden) and Vellicate(x, lily) -> Vellicate(worden, lily))\n\nVellicate(lily, lily)\n\nVellicate(lily, lily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The tedie is horizontal. The tedie is traceable. The tedie bituminize the adrien. The tedie trumpet the adrien. The adrien fodder the tedie. The adrien is horizontal. The adrien is alphameric. The adrien is unspoiled. The adrien is songlike. The adrien is traceable. The adrien bituminize the tedie. The adrien trumpet the tedie. If the tedie is songlike then the tedie bituminize the adrien. If someone bituminize the adrien and the adrien trumpet the tedie then they eat the adrien. If someone fodder the adrien and the adrien fodder the tedie then the tedie bituminize the adrien. If someone is alphameric then they need the tedie. If someone fodder the tedie and the tedie trumpet the adrien then they eat the adrien. Young people are alphameric. If someone is alphameric and traceable then they eat the adrien. If someone fodder the tedie and they need the adrien then the tedie trumpet the adrien. The tedie is not unspoiled.", "logic": "\nHorizontal(tedie)\nTraceable(tedie)\nBituminize(tedie, adrien)\nTrumpet(tedie, adrien)\nFodder(adrien, tedie)\nHorizontal(adrien)\nAlphameric(adrien)\nUnspoiled(adrien)\nSonglike(adrien)\nTraceable(adrien)\nBituminize(adrien, tedie)\nTrumpet(adrien, tedie)\nSonglike(tedie) -> Bituminize(tedie, adrien)\nforall x (Bituminize(x, adrien) and Trumpet(adrien, tedie) -> Fodder(x, adrien))\nforall x (Fodder(x, adrien) and Fodder(adrien, tedie) -> Bituminize(tedie, adrien))\nforall x (Alphameric(x) -> Trumpet(x, tedie))\nforall x (Fodder(x, tedie) and Trumpet(tedie, adrien) -> Fodder(x, adrien))\nforall x (Traceable(x) -> Alphameric(x))\nforall x (Alphameric(x) and Traceable(x) -> Fodder(x, adrien))\nforall x (Fodder(x, tedie) and Trumpet(x, adrien) -> Trumpet(tedie, adrien))\n\nnot Unspoiled(tedie)\n\nnot Unspoiled(tedie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The korie is outcast. The korie is magnetized. The korie reseal the cristine. The korie outmarch the cristine. The cristine forbid the korie. The cristine is outcast. The cristine is sweet. The cristine is shot. The cristine is slaphappy. The cristine is magnetized. The cristine reseal the korie. The cristine outmarch the korie. If the korie is slaphappy then the korie reseal the cristine. If someone reseal the cristine and the cristine outmarch the korie then they eat the cristine. If someone forbid the cristine and the cristine forbid the korie then the korie reseal the cristine. If someone is sweet then they need the korie. If someone forbid the korie and the korie outmarch the cristine then they eat the cristine. Young people are sweet. If someone is sweet and magnetized then they eat the cristine. If someone forbid the korie and they need the cristine then the korie outmarch the cristine. The korie is slaphappy.", "logic": "\nOutcast(korie)\nMagnetized(korie)\nReseal(korie, cristine)\nOutmarch(korie, cristine)\nForbid(cristine, korie)\nOutcast(cristine)\nSweet(cristine)\nShot(cristine)\nSlaphappy(cristine)\nMagnetized(cristine)\nReseal(cristine, korie)\nOutmarch(cristine, korie)\nSlaphappy(korie) -> Reseal(korie, cristine)\nforall x (Reseal(x, cristine) and Outmarch(cristine, korie) -> Forbid(x, cristine))\nforall x (Forbid(x, cristine) and Forbid(cristine, korie) -> Reseal(korie, cristine))\nforall x (Sweet(x) -> Outmarch(x, korie))\nforall x (Forbid(x, korie) and Outmarch(korie, cristine) -> Forbid(x, cristine))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Sweet(x))\nforall x (Sweet(x) and Magnetized(x) -> Forbid(x, cristine))\nforall x (Forbid(x, korie) and Outmarch(x, cristine) -> Outmarch(korie, cristine))\n\nSlaphappy(korie)\n\nSlaphappy(korie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-691"} {"premises": "The hebert overcrowd the etheline. The etheline is servo. The etheline redeem the hebert. If someone is servo and they need the hebert then they eat the hebert. If someone unhitch the hebert then the hebert is undercover. If someone unhitch the hebert then they chase the etheline. If the etheline is antiphonal then the etheline is mutinous. If someone is antiphonal and they chase the hebert then the hebert unhitch the etheline. If the etheline unhitch the hebert and the hebert is antiphonal then the etheline is mutinous. If someone is undercover then they eat the etheline. If the hebert is servo then the hebert overcrowd the etheline. The etheline is servo.", "logic": "\nOvercrowd(hebert, etheline)\nServo(etheline)\nRedeem(etheline, hebert)\nforall x (Servo(x) and Redeem(x, hebert) -> Unhitch(x, hebert))\nforall x (Unhitch(x, hebert) -> Undercover(hebert))\nforall x (Unhitch(x, hebert) -> Overcrowd(x, etheline))\nAntiphonal(etheline) -> Mutinous(etheline)\nforall x (Antiphonal(x) and Overcrowd(x, hebert) -> Unhitch(hebert, etheline))\nUnhitch(etheline, hebert) and Antiphonal(hebert) -> Mutinous(etheline)\nforall x (Undercover(x) -> Unhitch(x, etheline))\nServo(hebert) -> Overcrowd(hebert, etheline)\n\nServo(etheline)\n\ntherefore Servo(etheline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The aviva fast the almeda. The almeda is humbling. The almeda unburden the aviva. If someone is humbling and they need the aviva then they eat the aviva. If someone redesign the aviva then the aviva is corsican. If someone redesign the aviva then they chase the almeda. If the almeda is blithe then the almeda is pushful. If someone is blithe and they chase the aviva then the aviva redesign the almeda. If the almeda redesign the aviva and the aviva is blithe then the almeda is pushful. If someone is corsican then they eat the almeda. If the aviva is humbling then the aviva fast the almeda. The aviva does not chase the almeda.", "logic": "\nFast(aviva, almeda)\nHumbling(almeda)\nUnburden(almeda, aviva)\nforall x (Humbling(x) and Unburden(x, aviva) -> Redesign(x, aviva))\nforall x (Redesign(x, aviva) -> Corsican(aviva))\nforall x (Redesign(x, aviva) -> Fast(x, almeda))\nBlithe(almeda) -> Pushful(almeda)\nforall x (Blithe(x) and Fast(x, aviva) -> Redesign(aviva, almeda))\nRedesign(almeda, aviva) and Blithe(aviva) -> Pushful(almeda)\nforall x (Corsican(x) -> Redesign(x, almeda))\nHumbling(aviva) -> Fast(aviva, almeda)\n\nnot Fast(aviva, almeda)\n\ntherefore Fast(aviva, almeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The frederick crease the heddi. The heddi is allegiant. The heddi exuviate the frederick. If someone is allegiant and they need the frederick then they eat the frederick. If someone remove the frederick then the frederick is ropy. If someone remove the frederick then they chase the heddi. If the heddi is unhealed then the heddi is unstinted. If someone is unhealed and they chase the frederick then the frederick remove the heddi. If the heddi remove the frederick and the frederick is unhealed then the heddi is unstinted. If someone is ropy then they eat the heddi. If the frederick is allegiant then the frederick crease the heddi. The heddi remove the frederick.", "logic": "\nCrease(frederick, heddi)\nAllegiant(heddi)\nExuviate(heddi, frederick)\nforall x (Allegiant(x) and Exuviate(x, frederick) -> Remove(x, frederick))\nforall x (Remove(x, frederick) -> Ropy(frederick))\nforall x (Remove(x, frederick) -> Crease(x, heddi))\nUnhealed(heddi) -> Unstinted(heddi)\nforall x (Unhealed(x) and Crease(x, frederick) -> Remove(frederick, heddi))\nRemove(heddi, frederick) and Unhealed(frederick) -> Unstinted(heddi)\nforall x (Ropy(x) -> Remove(x, heddi))\nAllegiant(frederick) -> Crease(frederick, heddi)\n\nRemove(heddi, frederick)\n\nAllegiant(heddi) and Exuviate(heddi, frederick) and forall x (Allegiant(x) and Exuviate(x, frederick) -> Remove(x, frederick)) -> therefore Remove(heddi, frederick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The dolli thank the matthieu. The matthieu is luxuriant. The matthieu reprobate the dolli. If someone is luxuriant and they need the dolli then they eat the dolli. If someone persuade the dolli then the dolli is leftover. If someone persuade the dolli then they chase the matthieu. If the matthieu is caucasoid then the matthieu is albescent. If someone is caucasoid and they chase the dolli then the dolli persuade the matthieu. If the matthieu persuade the dolli and the dolli is caucasoid then the matthieu is albescent. If someone is leftover then they eat the matthieu. If the dolli is luxuriant then the dolli thank the matthieu. The matthieu does not eat the dolli.", "logic": "\nThank(dolli, matthieu)\nLuxuriant(matthieu)\nReprobate(matthieu, dolli)\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) and Reprobate(x, dolli) -> Persuade(x, dolli))\nforall x (Persuade(x, dolli) -> Leftover(dolli))\nforall x (Persuade(x, dolli) -> Thank(x, matthieu))\nCaucasoid(matthieu) -> Albescent(matthieu)\nforall x (Caucasoid(x) and Thank(x, dolli) -> Persuade(dolli, matthieu))\nPersuade(matthieu, dolli) and Caucasoid(dolli) -> Albescent(matthieu)\nforall x (Leftover(x) -> Persuade(x, matthieu))\nLuxuriant(dolli) -> Thank(dolli, matthieu)\n\nnot Persuade(matthieu, dolli)\n\nLuxuriant(matthieu) and Reprobate(matthieu, dolli) and forall x (Luxuriant(x) and Reprobate(x, dolli) -> Persuade(x, dolli)) -> therefore Persuade(matthieu, dolli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The viva percolate the enrica. The enrica is calcuttan. The enrica entice the viva. If someone is calcuttan and they need the viva then they eat the viva. If someone bolster the viva then the viva is capricious. If someone bolster the viva then they chase the enrica. If the enrica is lingual then the enrica is discerning. If someone is lingual and they chase the viva then the viva bolster the enrica. If the enrica bolster the viva and the viva is lingual then the enrica is discerning. If someone is capricious then they eat the enrica. If the viva is calcuttan then the viva percolate the enrica. The enrica percolate the enrica.", "logic": "\nPercolate(viva, enrica)\nCalcuttan(enrica)\nEntice(enrica, viva)\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) and Entice(x, viva) -> Bolster(x, viva))\nforall x (Bolster(x, viva) -> Capricious(viva))\nforall x (Bolster(x, viva) -> Percolate(x, enrica))\nLingual(enrica) -> Discerning(enrica)\nforall x (Lingual(x) and Percolate(x, viva) -> Bolster(viva, enrica))\nBolster(enrica, viva) and Lingual(viva) -> Discerning(enrica)\nforall x (Capricious(x) -> Bolster(x, enrica))\nCalcuttan(viva) -> Percolate(viva, enrica)\n\nPercolate(enrica, enrica)\n\nCalcuttan(enrica) and Entice(enrica, viva) and forall x (Calcuttan(x) and Entice(x, viva) -> Bolster(x, viva)) -> therefore Bolster(enrica, viva) Bolster(enrica, viva) and forall x (Bolster(x, viva) -> Percolate(x, enrica)) -> therefore Percolate(enrica, enrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The sallee engorge the joelle. The joelle is studded. The joelle caponize the sallee. If someone is studded and they need the sallee then they eat the sallee. If someone disport the sallee then the sallee is austral. If someone disport the sallee then they chase the joelle. If the joelle is metabolous then the joelle is small. If someone is metabolous and they chase the sallee then the sallee disport the joelle. If the joelle disport the sallee and the sallee is metabolous then the joelle is small. If someone is austral then they eat the joelle. If the sallee is studded then the sallee engorge the joelle. The sallee is not austral.", "logic": "\nEngorge(sallee, joelle)\nStudded(joelle)\nCaponize(joelle, sallee)\nforall x (Studded(x) and Caponize(x, sallee) -> Disport(x, sallee))\nforall x (Disport(x, sallee) -> Austral(sallee))\nforall x (Disport(x, sallee) -> Engorge(x, joelle))\nMetabolous(joelle) -> Small(joelle)\nforall x (Metabolous(x) and Engorge(x, sallee) -> Disport(sallee, joelle))\nDisport(joelle, sallee) and Metabolous(sallee) -> Small(joelle)\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Disport(x, joelle))\nStudded(sallee) -> Engorge(sallee, joelle)\n\nnot Austral(sallee)\n\nStudded(joelle) and Caponize(joelle, sallee) and forall x (Studded(x) and Caponize(x, sallee) -> Disport(x, sallee)) -> therefore Disport(joelle, sallee) Disport(joelle, sallee) and forall x (Disport(x, sallee) -> Austral(sallee)) -> therefore Austral(sallee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The etti confection the fawnia. The fawnia is equatorial. The fawnia interdict the etti. If someone is equatorial and they need the etti then they eat the etti. If someone infringe the etti then the etti is gambian. If someone infringe the etti then they chase the fawnia. If the fawnia is longtime then the fawnia is dowerless. If someone is longtime and they chase the etti then the etti infringe the fawnia. If the fawnia infringe the etti and the etti is longtime then the fawnia is dowerless. If someone is gambian then they eat the fawnia. If the etti is equatorial then the etti confection the fawnia. The etti does not eat the etti.", "logic": "\nConfection(etti, fawnia)\nEquatorial(fawnia)\nInterdict(fawnia, etti)\nforall x (Equatorial(x) and Interdict(x, etti) -> Infringe(x, etti))\nforall x (Infringe(x, etti) -> Gambian(etti))\nforall x (Infringe(x, etti) -> Confection(x, fawnia))\nLongtime(fawnia) -> Dowerless(fawnia)\nforall x (Longtime(x) and Confection(x, etti) -> Infringe(etti, fawnia))\nInfringe(fawnia, etti) and Longtime(etti) -> Dowerless(fawnia)\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> Infringe(x, fawnia))\nEquatorial(etti) -> Confection(etti, fawnia)\n\nnot Infringe(etti, etti)\n\nforall x (Equatorial(x) and Interdict(x, etti) -> Infringe(x, etti)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The lena berth the philomena. The philomena is coseismic. The philomena succor the lena. If someone is coseismic and they need the lena then they eat the lena. If someone procure the lena then the lena is severed. If someone procure the lena then they chase the philomena. If the philomena is vanilla then the philomena is semiotic. If someone is vanilla and they chase the lena then the lena procure the philomena. If the philomena procure the lena and the lena is vanilla then the philomena is semiotic. If someone is severed then they eat the philomena. If the lena is coseismic then the lena berth the philomena. The philomena is semiotic.", "logic": "\nBerth(lena, philomena)\nCoseismic(philomena)\nSuccor(philomena, lena)\nforall x (Coseismic(x) and Succor(x, lena) -> Procure(x, lena))\nforall x (Procure(x, lena) -> Severed(lena))\nforall x (Procure(x, lena) -> Berth(x, philomena))\nVanilla(philomena) -> Semiotic(philomena)\nforall x (Vanilla(x) and Berth(x, lena) -> Procure(lena, philomena))\nProcure(philomena, lena) and Vanilla(lena) -> Semiotic(philomena)\nforall x (Severed(x) -> Procure(x, philomena))\nCoseismic(lena) -> Berth(lena, philomena)\n\nSemiotic(philomena)\n\nVanilla(philomena) -> Semiotic(philomena) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The rainer distribute the ulrica. The ulrica is daredevil. The ulrica gluttonize the rainer. If someone is daredevil and they need the rainer then they eat the rainer. If someone attend the rainer then the rainer is pragmatic. If someone attend the rainer then they chase the ulrica. If the ulrica is nerveless then the ulrica is handy. If someone is nerveless and they chase the rainer then the rainer attend the ulrica. If the ulrica attend the rainer and the rainer is nerveless then the ulrica is handy. If someone is pragmatic then they eat the ulrica. If the rainer is daredevil then the rainer distribute the ulrica. The ulrica does not eat the ulrica.", "logic": "\nDistribute(rainer, ulrica)\nDaredevil(ulrica)\nGluttonize(ulrica, rainer)\nforall x (Daredevil(x) and Gluttonize(x, rainer) -> Attend(x, rainer))\nforall x (Attend(x, rainer) -> Pragmatic(rainer))\nforall x (Attend(x, rainer) -> Distribute(x, ulrica))\nNerveless(ulrica) -> Handy(ulrica)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and Distribute(x, rainer) -> Attend(rainer, ulrica))\nAttend(ulrica, rainer) and Nerveless(rainer) -> Handy(ulrica)\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) -> Attend(x, ulrica))\nDaredevil(rainer) -> Distribute(rainer, ulrica)\n\nnot Attend(ulrica, ulrica)\n\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) -> Attend(x, ulrica)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The lionel overexpose the isahella. The isahella is spacial. The isahella recruit the lionel. If someone is spacial and they need the lionel then they eat the lionel. If someone randomise the lionel then the lionel is datable. If someone randomise the lionel then they chase the isahella. If the isahella is prepacked then the isahella is soggy. If someone is prepacked and they chase the lionel then the lionel randomise the isahella. If the isahella randomise the lionel and the lionel is prepacked then the isahella is soggy. If someone is datable then they eat the isahella. If the lionel is spacial then the lionel overexpose the isahella. The isahella overexpose the lionel.", "logic": "\nOverexpose(lionel, isahella)\nSpacial(isahella)\nRecruit(isahella, lionel)\nforall x (Spacial(x) and Recruit(x, lionel) -> Randomise(x, lionel))\nforall x (Randomise(x, lionel) -> Datable(lionel))\nforall x (Randomise(x, lionel) -> Overexpose(x, isahella))\nPrepacked(isahella) -> Soggy(isahella)\nforall x (Prepacked(x) and Overexpose(x, lionel) -> Randomise(lionel, isahella))\nRandomise(isahella, lionel) and Prepacked(lionel) -> Soggy(isahella)\nforall x (Datable(x) -> Randomise(x, isahella))\nSpacial(lionel) -> Overexpose(lionel, isahella)\n\nOverexpose(isahella, lionel)\n\nOverexpose(isahella, lionel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The merola tank the wynnie. The wynnie is ampullar. The wynnie retrograde the merola. If someone is ampullar and they need the merola then they eat the merola. If someone cheerlead the merola then the merola is downward. If someone cheerlead the merola then they chase the wynnie. If the wynnie is unscripted then the wynnie is different. If someone is unscripted and they chase the merola then the merola cheerlead the wynnie. If the wynnie cheerlead the merola and the merola is unscripted then the wynnie is different. If someone is downward then they eat the wynnie. If the merola is ampullar then the merola tank the wynnie. The merola does not chase the merola.", "logic": "\nTank(merola, wynnie)\nAmpullar(wynnie)\nRetrograde(wynnie, merola)\nforall x (Ampullar(x) and Retrograde(x, merola) -> Cheerlead(x, merola))\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, merola) -> Downward(merola))\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, merola) -> Tank(x, wynnie))\nUnscripted(wynnie) -> Different(wynnie)\nforall x (Unscripted(x) and Tank(x, merola) -> Cheerlead(merola, wynnie))\nCheerlead(wynnie, merola) and Unscripted(merola) -> Different(wynnie)\nforall x (Downward(x) -> Cheerlead(x, wynnie))\nAmpullar(merola) -> Tank(merola, wynnie)\n\nnot Tank(merola, merola)\n\nnot Tank(merola, merola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "The geoffry discount the ingamar. The ingamar is skinless. The ingamar allure the geoffry. If someone is skinless and they need the geoffry then they eat the geoffry. If someone slenderize the geoffry then the geoffry is snooty. If someone slenderize the geoffry then they chase the ingamar. If the ingamar is arcane then the ingamar is sent. If someone is arcane and they chase the geoffry then the geoffry slenderize the ingamar. If the ingamar slenderize the geoffry and the geoffry is arcane then the ingamar is sent. If someone is snooty then they eat the ingamar. If the geoffry is skinless then the geoffry discount the ingamar. The geoffry allure the ingamar.", "logic": "\nDiscount(geoffry, ingamar)\nSkinless(ingamar)\nAllure(ingamar, geoffry)\nforall x (Skinless(x) and Allure(x, geoffry) -> Slenderize(x, geoffry))\nforall x (Slenderize(x, geoffry) -> Snooty(geoffry))\nforall x (Slenderize(x, geoffry) -> Discount(x, ingamar))\nArcane(ingamar) -> Sent(ingamar)\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Discount(x, geoffry) -> Slenderize(geoffry, ingamar))\nSlenderize(ingamar, geoffry) and Arcane(geoffry) -> Sent(ingamar)\nforall x (Snooty(x) -> Slenderize(x, ingamar))\nSkinless(geoffry) -> Discount(geoffry, ingamar)\n\nAllure(geoffry, ingamar)\n\nAllure(geoffry, ingamar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1686"} {"premises": "Vivia is rightish. Dottie is cloven. All nonrigid, cloven people are attrited. All cloven people are nonrigid. If Vivia is binaural and Vivia is cloven then Vivia is utilizable. Dottie is cloven.", "logic": "\nRightish(vivia)\nCloven(dottie)\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) and Cloven(x) -> Attrited(x))\nforall x (Cloven(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\nBinaural(vivia) and Cloven(vivia) -> Utilizable(vivia)\n\nCloven(dottie)\n\ntherefore Cloven(dottie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Connolly is guiding. Quincey is harmonised. All siliceous, harmonised people are lxxx. All harmonised people are siliceous. If Connolly is tertian and Connolly is harmonised then Connolly is rotatable. Quincey is not harmonised.", "logic": "\nGuiding(connolly)\nHarmonised(quincey)\nforall x (Siliceous(x) and Harmonised(x) -> Lxxx(x))\nforall x (Harmonised(x) -> Siliceous(x))\nTertian(connolly) and Harmonised(connolly) -> Rotatable(connolly)\n\nnot Harmonised(quincey)\n\ntherefore Harmonised(quincey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Starla is epistolary. Chery is snuggled. All thickening, snuggled people are juicy. All snuggled people are thickening. If Starla is victorious and Starla is snuggled then Starla is cathartic. Chery is thickening.", "logic": "\nEpistolary(starla)\nSnuggled(chery)\nforall x (Thickening(x) and Snuggled(x) -> Juicy(x))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> Thickening(x))\nVictorious(starla) and Snuggled(starla) -> Cathartic(starla)\n\nThickening(chery)\n\nSnuggled(chery) and forall x (Snuggled(x) -> Thickening(x)) -> therefore Thickening(chery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Carlynne is amorous. Barnard is fidgety. All duplicate, fidgety people are calycinal. All fidgety people are duplicate. If Carlynne is impure and Carlynne is fidgety then Carlynne is razed. Barnard is not duplicate.", "logic": "\nAmorous(carlynne)\nFidgety(barnard)\nforall x (Duplicate(x) and Fidgety(x) -> Calycinal(x))\nforall x (Fidgety(x) -> Duplicate(x))\nImpure(carlynne) and Fidgety(carlynne) -> Razed(carlynne)\n\nnot Duplicate(barnard)\n\nFidgety(barnard) and forall x (Fidgety(x) -> Duplicate(x)) -> therefore Duplicate(barnard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Shaylah is irascible. Lon is overhand. All babelike, overhand people are dreamy. All overhand people are babelike. If Shaylah is nonpublic and Shaylah is overhand then Shaylah is opencast. Lon is dreamy.", "logic": "\nIrascible(shaylah)\nOverhand(lon)\nforall x (Babelike(x) and Overhand(x) -> Dreamy(x))\nforall x (Overhand(x) -> Babelike(x))\nNonpublic(shaylah) and Overhand(shaylah) -> Opencast(shaylah)\n\nDreamy(lon)\n\nOverhand(lon) and forall x (Overhand(x) -> Babelike(x)) -> therefore Babelike(lon) Babelike(lon) and Overhand(lon) and forall x (Babelike(x) and Overhand(x) -> Dreamy(x)) -> therefore Dreamy(lon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Parnell is strapless. Lilias is infallible. All fleshy, infallible people are bent. All infallible people are fleshy. If Parnell is indisposed and Parnell is infallible then Parnell is assumptive. Lilias is not bent.", "logic": "\nStrapless(parnell)\nInfallible(lilias)\nforall x (Fleshy(x) and Infallible(x) -> Bent(x))\nforall x (Infallible(x) -> Fleshy(x))\nIndisposed(parnell) and Infallible(parnell) -> Assumptive(parnell)\n\nnot Bent(lilias)\n\nInfallible(lilias) and forall x (Infallible(x) -> Fleshy(x)) -> therefore Fleshy(lilias) Fleshy(lilias) and Infallible(lilias) and forall x (Fleshy(x) and Infallible(x) -> Bent(x)) -> therefore Bent(lilias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Roch is princely. Marley is empirical. All employable, empirical people are gradable. All empirical people are employable. If Roch is laic and Roch is empirical then Roch is aplitic. Roch is not gradable.", "logic": "\nPrincely(roch)\nEmpirical(marley)\nforall x (Employable(x) and Empirical(x) -> Gradable(x))\nforall x (Empirical(x) -> Employable(x))\nLaic(roch) and Empirical(roch) -> Aplitic(roch)\n\nnot Gradable(roch)\n\nforall x (Employable(x) and Empirical(x) -> Gradable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Donald is prefatory. Benson is placental. All sorrowful, placental people are bicorned. All placental people are sorrowful. If Donald is answerable and Donald is placental then Donald is purifying. Donald is purifying.", "logic": "\nPrefatory(donald)\nPlacental(benson)\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) and Placental(x) -> Bicorned(x))\nforall x (Placental(x) -> Sorrowful(x))\nAnswerable(donald) and Placental(donald) -> Purifying(donald)\n\nPurifying(donald)\n\nAnswerable(donald) and Placental(donald) -> Purifying(donald) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Whitman is banausic. Madel is polyoicous. All taking, polyoicous people are unequaled. All polyoicous people are taking. If Whitman is pretorian and Whitman is polyoicous then Whitman is sorry. Whitman is not taking.", "logic": "\nBanausic(whitman)\nPolyoicous(madel)\nforall x (Taking(x) and Polyoicous(x) -> Unequaled(x))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) -> Taking(x))\nPretorian(whitman) and Polyoicous(whitman) -> Sorry(whitman)\n\nnot Taking(whitman)\n\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) -> Taking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Ilona is aestival. Birgit is supperless. All rightmost, supperless people are laminal. All supperless people are rightmost. If Ilona is puff and Ilona is supperless then Ilona is weepy. Birgit is puff.", "logic": "\nAestival(ilona)\nSupperless(birgit)\nforall x (Rightmost(x) and Supperless(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Supperless(x) -> Rightmost(x))\nPuff(ilona) and Supperless(ilona) -> Weepy(ilona)\n\nPuff(birgit)\n\nPuff(birgit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Christean is expositive. Beale is allowable. All winking, allowable people are matured. All allowable people are winking. If Christean is ameban and Christean is allowable then Christean is english. Christean is not ameban.", "logic": "\nExpositive(christean)\nAllowable(beale)\nforall x (Winking(x) and Allowable(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Allowable(x) -> Winking(x))\nAmeban(christean) and Allowable(christean) -> English(christean)\n\nnot Ameban(christean)\n\nnot Ameban(christean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Jacques is unstarred. Geoff is orotund. All whitened, orotund people are bonkers. All orotund people are whitened. If Jacques is jiggered and Jacques is orotund then Jacques is anaerobic. Geoff is smart.", "logic": "\nUnstarred(jacques)\nOrotund(geoff)\nforall x (Whitened(x) and Orotund(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Orotund(x) -> Whitened(x))\nJiggered(jacques) and Orotund(jacques) -> Anaerobic(jacques)\n\nSmart(geoff)\n\nSmart(geoff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2268"} {"premises": "Kristina is pandemic. Kristina is still. Kristina is hittite. Kristina is emarginate. Kristina is cutthroat. Kristina is luculent. Nixie is pandemic. Nixie is still. Nixie is hittite. Nixie is cutthroat. All cutthroat, luculent people are emarginate. Furry people are luculent. Nixie is still.", "logic": "\nPandemic(kristina)\nStill(kristina)\nHittite(kristina)\nEmarginate(kristina)\nCutthroat(kristina)\nLuculent(kristina)\nPandemic(nixie)\nStill(nixie)\nHittite(nixie)\nCutthroat(nixie)\nforall x (Cutthroat(x) and Luculent(x) -> Emarginate(x))\nforall x (Still(x) -> Luculent(x))\n\nStill(nixie)\n\ntherefore Still(nixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Maurita is unblushing. Maurita is wizardly. Maurita is pendulous. Maurita is verminous. Maurita is dirt. Maurita is gibbous. Oliver is unblushing. Oliver is wizardly. Oliver is pendulous. Oliver is dirt. All dirt, gibbous people are verminous. Furry people are gibbous. Oliver is not pendulous.", "logic": "\nUnblushing(maurita)\nWizardly(maurita)\nPendulous(maurita)\nVerminous(maurita)\nDirt(maurita)\nGibbous(maurita)\nUnblushing(oliver)\nWizardly(oliver)\nPendulous(oliver)\nDirt(oliver)\nforall x (Dirt(x) and Gibbous(x) -> Verminous(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Gibbous(x))\n\nnot Pendulous(oliver)\n\ntherefore Pendulous(oliver)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Kayley is spiritual. Kayley is enraptured. Kayley is audile. Kayley is hemolytic. Kayley is heraldic. Kayley is gorgeous. Gian is spiritual. Gian is enraptured. Gian is audile. Gian is heraldic. All heraldic, gorgeous people are hemolytic. Furry people are gorgeous. Gian is gorgeous.", "logic": "\nSpiritual(kayley)\nEnraptured(kayley)\nAudile(kayley)\nHemolytic(kayley)\nHeraldic(kayley)\nGorgeous(kayley)\nSpiritual(gian)\nEnraptured(gian)\nAudile(gian)\nHeraldic(gian)\nforall x (Heraldic(x) and Gorgeous(x) -> Hemolytic(x))\nforall x (Enraptured(x) -> Gorgeous(x))\n\nGorgeous(gian)\n\nEnraptured(gian) and forall x (Enraptured(x) -> Gorgeous(x)) -> therefore Gorgeous(gian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Franni is ancillary. Franni is open. Franni is exclusive. Franni is electronic. Franni is indiscrete. Franni is xxix. May is ancillary. May is open. May is exclusive. May is indiscrete. All indiscrete, xxix people are electronic. Furry people are xxix. May is not xxix.", "logic": "\nAncillary(franni)\nOpen(franni)\nExclusive(franni)\nElectronic(franni)\nIndiscrete(franni)\nXxix(franni)\nAncillary(may)\nOpen(may)\nExclusive(may)\nIndiscrete(may)\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) and Xxix(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Open(x) -> Xxix(x))\n\nnot Xxix(may)\n\nOpen(may) and forall x (Open(x) -> Xxix(x)) -> therefore Xxix(may)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Spud is documental. Spud is pestering. Spud is unwedded. Spud is cxxxv. Spud is fettered. Spud is earned. Srinivas is documental. Srinivas is pestering. Srinivas is unwedded. Srinivas is fettered. All fettered, earned people are cxxxv. Furry people are earned. Srinivas is cxxxv.", "logic": "\nDocumental(spud)\nPestering(spud)\nUnwedded(spud)\nCxxxv(spud)\nFettered(spud)\nEarned(spud)\nDocumental(srinivas)\nPestering(srinivas)\nUnwedded(srinivas)\nFettered(srinivas)\nforall x (Fettered(x) and Earned(x) -> Cxxxv(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) -> Earned(x))\n\nCxxxv(srinivas)\n\nPestering(srinivas) and forall x (Pestering(x) -> Earned(x)) -> therefore Earned(srinivas) Fettered(srinivas) and Earned(srinivas) and forall x (Fettered(x) and Earned(x) -> Cxxxv(x)) -> therefore Cxxxv(srinivas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Rolando is subsonic. Rolando is unpassable. Rolando is edematous. Rolando is flossy. Rolando is transitive. Rolando is baggy. Netti is subsonic. Netti is unpassable. Netti is edematous. Netti is transitive. All transitive, baggy people are flossy. Furry people are baggy. Netti is not flossy.", "logic": "\nSubsonic(rolando)\nUnpassable(rolando)\nEdematous(rolando)\nFlossy(rolando)\nTransitive(rolando)\nBaggy(rolando)\nSubsonic(netti)\nUnpassable(netti)\nEdematous(netti)\nTransitive(netti)\nforall x (Transitive(x) and Baggy(x) -> Flossy(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> Baggy(x))\n\nnot Flossy(netti)\n\nUnpassable(netti) and forall x (Unpassable(x) -> Baggy(x)) -> therefore Baggy(netti) Transitive(netti) and Baggy(netti) and forall x (Transitive(x) and Baggy(x) -> Flossy(x)) -> therefore Flossy(netti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Lysandra is inordinate. Lysandra is fawning. Lysandra is anchoritic. Lysandra is condemning. Lysandra is coolheaded. Lysandra is stomatal. Levi is inordinate. Levi is fawning. Levi is anchoritic. Levi is coolheaded. All coolheaded, stomatal people are condemning. Furry people are stomatal. Levi is not round.", "logic": "\nInordinate(lysandra)\nFawning(lysandra)\nAnchoritic(lysandra)\nCondemning(lysandra)\nCoolheaded(lysandra)\nStomatal(lysandra)\nInordinate(levi)\nFawning(levi)\nAnchoritic(levi)\nCoolheaded(levi)\nforall x (Coolheaded(x) and Stomatal(x) -> Condemning(x))\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Stomatal(x))\n\nnot Round(levi)\n\nnot Round(levi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Myron is ribbed. Myron is cryptic. Myron is amnesiac. Myron is inerrable. Myron is latticed. Myron is medicinal. Halvard is ribbed. Halvard is cryptic. Halvard is amnesiac. Halvard is latticed. All latticed, medicinal people are inerrable. Furry people are medicinal. Myron is round.", "logic": "\nRibbed(myron)\nCryptic(myron)\nAmnesiac(myron)\nInerrable(myron)\nLatticed(myron)\nMedicinal(myron)\nRibbed(halvard)\nCryptic(halvard)\nAmnesiac(halvard)\nLatticed(halvard)\nforall x (Latticed(x) and Medicinal(x) -> Inerrable(x))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) -> Medicinal(x))\n\nRound(myron)\n\nRound(myron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1304"} {"premises": "Nissie is blowy. Cathrin is reverting. Cathrin is dissolute. Smart people are fugitive. If Cathrin is fugitive and Cathrin is dissolute then Cathrin is consoling. Nissie is blowy.", "logic": "\nBlowy(nissie)\nReverting(cathrin)\nDissolute(cathrin)\nforall x (Dissolute(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nFugitive(cathrin) and Dissolute(cathrin) -> Consoling(cathrin)\n\nBlowy(nissie)\n\ntherefore Blowy(nissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Sim is sclerosed. Norton is calendric. Norton is oxidized. Smart people are artistic. If Norton is artistic and Norton is oxidized then Norton is dissenting. Sim is not sclerosed.", "logic": "\nSclerosed(sim)\nCalendric(norton)\nOxidized(norton)\nforall x (Oxidized(x) -> Artistic(x))\nArtistic(norton) and Oxidized(norton) -> Dissenting(norton)\n\nnot Sclerosed(sim)\n\ntherefore Sclerosed(sim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Duane is heated. Reinhold is vitrified. Reinhold is harnessed. Smart people are ransomed. If Reinhold is ransomed and Reinhold is harnessed then Reinhold is surd. Reinhold is ransomed.", "logic": "\nHeated(duane)\nVitrified(reinhold)\nHarnessed(reinhold)\nforall x (Harnessed(x) -> Ransomed(x))\nRansomed(reinhold) and Harnessed(reinhold) -> Surd(reinhold)\n\nRansomed(reinhold)\n\nHarnessed(reinhold) and forall x (Harnessed(x) -> Ransomed(x)) -> therefore Ransomed(reinhold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Marian is inhuman. Ronnica is streaming. Ronnica is littoral. Smart people are coronary. If Ronnica is coronary and Ronnica is littoral then Ronnica is acinous. Ronnica is not coronary.", "logic": "\nInhuman(marian)\nStreaming(ronnica)\nLittoral(ronnica)\nforall x (Littoral(x) -> Coronary(x))\nCoronary(ronnica) and Littoral(ronnica) -> Acinous(ronnica)\n\nnot Coronary(ronnica)\n\nLittoral(ronnica) and forall x (Littoral(x) -> Coronary(x)) -> therefore Coronary(ronnica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Grace is mullioned. Renel is refreshing. Renel is unclad. Smart people are burbling. If Renel is burbling and Renel is unclad then Renel is amnesic. Renel is amnesic.", "logic": "\nMullioned(grace)\nRefreshing(renel)\nUnclad(renel)\nforall x (Unclad(x) -> Burbling(x))\nBurbling(renel) and Unclad(renel) -> Amnesic(renel)\n\nAmnesic(renel)\n\nUnclad(renel) and forall x (Unclad(x) -> Burbling(x)) -> therefore Burbling(renel) Burbling(renel) and Unclad(renel) and Burbling(renel) and Unclad(renel) -> Amnesic(renel) -> therefore Amnesic(renel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Ashley is visceral. Selina is anadromous. Selina is blocky. Smart people are stabilised. If Selina is stabilised and Selina is blocky then Selina is accumbent. Selina is not accumbent.", "logic": "\nVisceral(ashley)\nAnadromous(selina)\nBlocky(selina)\nforall x (Blocky(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nStabilised(selina) and Blocky(selina) -> Accumbent(selina)\n\nnot Accumbent(selina)\n\nBlocky(selina) and forall x (Blocky(x) -> Stabilised(x)) -> therefore Stabilised(selina) Stabilised(selina) and Blocky(selina) and Stabilised(selina) and Blocky(selina) -> Accumbent(selina) -> therefore Accumbent(selina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Morris is basilary. Bucky is thirtieth. Bucky is catholic. Smart people are unnerving. If Bucky is unnerving and Bucky is catholic then Bucky is overt. Morris is not unnerving.", "logic": "\nBasilary(morris)\nThirtieth(bucky)\nCatholic(bucky)\nforall x (Catholic(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nUnnerving(bucky) and Catholic(bucky) -> Overt(bucky)\n\nnot Unnerving(morris)\n\nforall x (Catholic(x) -> Unnerving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Erwin is fluid. Alicia is outsized. Alicia is rolling. Smart people are brazen. If Alicia is brazen and Alicia is rolling then Alicia is inmost. Erwin is outsized.", "logic": "\nFluid(erwin)\nOutsized(alicia)\nRolling(alicia)\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Brazen(x))\nBrazen(alicia) and Rolling(alicia) -> Inmost(alicia)\n\nOutsized(erwin)\n\nOutsized(erwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Bernetta is skintight. Sax is regardant. Sax is aerolitic. Smart people are activist. If Sax is activist and Sax is aerolitic then Sax is mendacious. Bernetta is not aerolitic.", "logic": "\nSkintight(bernetta)\nRegardant(sax)\nAerolitic(sax)\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Activist(x))\nActivist(sax) and Aerolitic(sax) -> Mendacious(sax)\n\nnot Aerolitic(bernetta)\n\nnot Aerolitic(bernetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Debra is branchless. Benedict is overt. Benedict is rarefied. Smart people are cocky. If Benedict is cocky and Benedict is rarefied then Benedict is causal. Debra is big.", "logic": "\nBranchless(debra)\nOvert(benedict)\nRarefied(benedict)\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> Cocky(x))\nCocky(benedict) and Rarefied(benedict) -> Causal(benedict)\n\nBig(debra)\n\nBig(debra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Charlotta is filiform. Bucky is puzzling. Bucky is lxxxiv. Smart people are gutless. If Bucky is gutless and Bucky is lxxxiv then Bucky is airlike. Bucky is not white.", "logic": "\nFiliform(charlotta)\nPuzzling(bucky)\nLxxxiv(bucky)\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) -> Gutless(x))\nGutless(bucky) and Lxxxiv(bucky) -> Airlike(bucky)\n\nnot White(bucky)\n\nnot White(bucky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "Barbabas is visualized. Edythe is hazy. Edythe is clxxx. Smart people are gastric. If Edythe is gastric and Edythe is clxxx then Edythe is rumanian. Edythe is big.", "logic": "\nVisualized(barbabas)\nHazy(edythe)\nClxxx(edythe)\nforall x (Clxxx(x) -> Gastric(x))\nGastric(edythe) and Clxxx(edythe) -> Rumanian(edythe)\n\nBig(edythe)\n\nBig(edythe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2285"} {"premises": "The antonin snip the leila. The haskell magnetize the antonin. The haskell is geothermic. The haskell snip the lucky. The leila interfere the antonin. The leila is twoscore. The lucky interfere the antonin. The lucky is catarrhal. The lucky is discalced. The lucky snip the haskell. If someone is twoscore and they like the leila then the leila magnetize the antonin. If someone is geothermic and jade then they eat the haskell. If someone magnetize the haskell then they eat the haskell. If someone interfere the leila and they eat the antonin then they like the antonin. If someone magnetize the lucky then the lucky interfere the leila. If someone is catarrhal then they chase the lucky. If someone interfere the haskell then the haskell magnetize the lucky. If someone magnetize the antonin then the antonin is jade. The antonin snip the leila.", "logic": "\nSnip(antonin, leila)\nMagnetize(haskell, antonin)\nGeothermic(haskell)\nSnip(haskell, lucky)\nInterfere(leila, antonin)\nTwoscore(leila)\nInterfere(lucky, antonin)\nCatarrhal(lucky)\nDiscalced(lucky)\nSnip(lucky, haskell)\nforall x (Twoscore(x) and Snip(x, leila) -> Magnetize(leila, antonin))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) and Jade(x) -> Interfere(x, haskell))\nforall x (Magnetize(x, haskell) -> Interfere(x, haskell))\nforall x (Interfere(x, leila) and Interfere(x, antonin) -> Snip(x, antonin))\nforall x (Magnetize(x, lucky) -> Interfere(lucky, leila))\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) -> Magnetize(x, lucky))\nforall x (Interfere(x, haskell) -> Magnetize(haskell, lucky))\nforall x (Magnetize(x, antonin) -> Jade(antonin))\n\nSnip(antonin, leila)\n\ntherefore Snip(antonin, leila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The beck parole the taddeus. The tamas stabilize the beck. The tamas is squamulose. The tamas parole the marybelle. The taddeus concertise the beck. The taddeus is spurious. The marybelle concertise the beck. The marybelle is sniffy. The marybelle is malarial. The marybelle parole the tamas. If someone is spurious and they like the taddeus then the taddeus stabilize the beck. If someone is squamulose and telepathic then they eat the tamas. If someone stabilize the tamas then they eat the tamas. If someone concertise the taddeus and they eat the beck then they like the beck. If someone stabilize the marybelle then the marybelle concertise the taddeus. If someone is sniffy then they chase the marybelle. If someone concertise the tamas then the tamas stabilize the marybelle. If someone stabilize the beck then the beck is telepathic. The marybelle is not malarial.", "logic": "\nParole(beck, taddeus)\nStabilize(tamas, beck)\nSquamulose(tamas)\nParole(tamas, marybelle)\nConcertise(taddeus, beck)\nSpurious(taddeus)\nConcertise(marybelle, beck)\nSniffy(marybelle)\nMalarial(marybelle)\nParole(marybelle, tamas)\nforall x (Spurious(x) and Parole(x, taddeus) -> Stabilize(taddeus, beck))\nforall x (Squamulose(x) and Telepathic(x) -> Concertise(x, tamas))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, tamas) -> Concertise(x, tamas))\nforall x (Concertise(x, taddeus) and Concertise(x, beck) -> Parole(x, beck))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, marybelle) -> Concertise(marybelle, taddeus))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Stabilize(x, marybelle))\nforall x (Concertise(x, tamas) -> Stabilize(tamas, marybelle))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, beck) -> Telepathic(beck))\n\nnot Malarial(marybelle)\n\ntherefore Malarial(marybelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The sid state the elna. The agustin judge the sid. The agustin is unsleeping. The agustin state the ardine. The elna sympathise the sid. The elna is fragmented. The ardine sympathise the sid. The ardine is araneidal. The ardine is prideful. The ardine state the agustin. If someone is fragmented and they like the elna then the elna judge the sid. If someone is unsleeping and infertile then they eat the agustin. If someone judge the agustin then they eat the agustin. If someone sympathise the elna and they eat the sid then they like the sid. If someone judge the ardine then the ardine sympathise the elna. If someone is araneidal then they chase the ardine. If someone sympathise the agustin then the agustin judge the ardine. If someone judge the sid then the sid is infertile. The sid is infertile.", "logic": "\nState(sid, elna)\nJudge(agustin, sid)\nUnsleeping(agustin)\nState(agustin, ardine)\nSympathise(elna, sid)\nFragmented(elna)\nSympathise(ardine, sid)\nAraneidal(ardine)\nPrideful(ardine)\nState(ardine, agustin)\nforall x (Fragmented(x) and State(x, elna) -> Judge(elna, sid))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) and Infertile(x) -> Sympathise(x, agustin))\nforall x (Judge(x, agustin) -> Sympathise(x, agustin))\nforall x (Sympathise(x, elna) and Sympathise(x, sid) -> State(x, sid))\nforall x (Judge(x, ardine) -> Sympathise(ardine, elna))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) -> Judge(x, ardine))\nforall x (Sympathise(x, agustin) -> Judge(agustin, ardine))\nforall x (Judge(x, sid) -> Infertile(sid))\n\nInfertile(sid)\n\nJudge(agustin, sid) and forall x (Judge(x, sid) -> Infertile(sid)) -> therefore Infertile(sid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The verine infuscate the editha. The kenn becloud the verine. The kenn is remarkable. The kenn infuscate the hope. The editha deodorize the verine. The editha is softish. The hope deodorize the verine. The hope is amended. The hope is anabolic. The hope infuscate the kenn. If someone is softish and they like the editha then the editha becloud the verine. If someone is remarkable and estranging then they eat the kenn. If someone becloud the kenn then they eat the kenn. If someone deodorize the editha and they eat the verine then they like the verine. If someone becloud the hope then the hope deodorize the editha. If someone is amended then they chase the hope. If someone deodorize the kenn then the kenn becloud the hope. If someone becloud the verine then the verine is estranging. The hope does not chase the hope.", "logic": "\nInfuscate(verine, editha)\nBecloud(kenn, verine)\nRemarkable(kenn)\nInfuscate(kenn, hope)\nDeodorize(editha, verine)\nSoftish(editha)\nDeodorize(hope, verine)\nAmended(hope)\nAnabolic(hope)\nInfuscate(hope, kenn)\nforall x (Softish(x) and Infuscate(x, editha) -> Becloud(editha, verine))\nforall x (Remarkable(x) and Estranging(x) -> Deodorize(x, kenn))\nforall x (Becloud(x, kenn) -> Deodorize(x, kenn))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, editha) and Deodorize(x, verine) -> Infuscate(x, verine))\nforall x (Becloud(x, hope) -> Deodorize(hope, editha))\nforall x (Amended(x) -> Becloud(x, hope))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, kenn) -> Becloud(kenn, hope))\nforall x (Becloud(x, verine) -> Estranging(verine))\n\nnot Becloud(hope, hope)\n\nAmended(hope) and forall x (Amended(x) -> Becloud(x, hope)) -> therefore Becloud(hope, hope)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The merl march the roana. The aveline grit the merl. The aveline is carroty. The aveline march the brewster. The roana fare the merl. The roana is longtime. The brewster fare the merl. The brewster is cenozoic. The brewster is teachable. The brewster march the aveline. If someone is longtime and they like the roana then the roana grit the merl. If someone is carroty and virulent then they eat the aveline. If someone grit the aveline then they eat the aveline. If someone fare the roana and they eat the merl then they like the merl. If someone grit the brewster then the brewster fare the roana. If someone is cenozoic then they chase the brewster. If someone fare the aveline then the aveline grit the brewster. If someone grit the merl then the merl is virulent. The brewster fare the roana.", "logic": "\nMarch(merl, roana)\nGrit(aveline, merl)\nCarroty(aveline)\nMarch(aveline, brewster)\nFare(roana, merl)\nLongtime(roana)\nFare(brewster, merl)\nCenozoic(brewster)\nTeachable(brewster)\nMarch(brewster, aveline)\nforall x (Longtime(x) and March(x, roana) -> Grit(roana, merl))\nforall x (Carroty(x) and Virulent(x) -> Fare(x, aveline))\nforall x (Grit(x, aveline) -> Fare(x, aveline))\nforall x (Fare(x, roana) and Fare(x, merl) -> March(x, merl))\nforall x (Grit(x, brewster) -> Fare(brewster, roana))\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) -> Grit(x, brewster))\nforall x (Fare(x, aveline) -> Grit(aveline, brewster))\nforall x (Grit(x, merl) -> Virulent(merl))\n\nFare(brewster, roana)\n\nCenozoic(brewster) and forall x (Cenozoic(x) -> Grit(x, brewster)) -> therefore Grit(brewster, brewster) Grit(brewster, brewster) and forall x (Grit(x, brewster) -> Fare(brewster, roana)) -> therefore Fare(brewster, roana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The fabian ruffle the idaline. The bea shoulder the fabian. The bea is bristly. The bea ruffle the sabine. The idaline waffle the fabian. The idaline is helical. The sabine waffle the fabian. The sabine is steaming. The sabine is motherless. The sabine ruffle the bea. If someone is helical and they like the idaline then the idaline shoulder the fabian. If someone is bristly and spurting then they eat the bea. If someone shoulder the bea then they eat the bea. If someone waffle the idaline and they eat the fabian then they like the fabian. If someone shoulder the sabine then the sabine waffle the idaline. If someone is steaming then they chase the sabine. If someone waffle the bea then the bea shoulder the sabine. If someone shoulder the fabian then the fabian is spurting. The sabine does not eat the idaline.", "logic": "\nRuffle(fabian, idaline)\nShoulder(bea, fabian)\nBristly(bea)\nRuffle(bea, sabine)\nWaffle(idaline, fabian)\nHelical(idaline)\nWaffle(sabine, fabian)\nSteaming(sabine)\nMotherless(sabine)\nRuffle(sabine, bea)\nforall x (Helical(x) and Ruffle(x, idaline) -> Shoulder(idaline, fabian))\nforall x (Bristly(x) and Spurting(x) -> Waffle(x, bea))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, bea) -> Waffle(x, bea))\nforall x (Waffle(x, idaline) and Waffle(x, fabian) -> Ruffle(x, fabian))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, sabine) -> Waffle(sabine, idaline))\nforall x (Steaming(x) -> Shoulder(x, sabine))\nforall x (Waffle(x, bea) -> Shoulder(bea, sabine))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, fabian) -> Spurting(fabian))\n\nnot Waffle(sabine, idaline)\n\nSteaming(sabine) and forall x (Steaming(x) -> Shoulder(x, sabine)) -> therefore Shoulder(sabine, sabine) Shoulder(sabine, sabine) and forall x (Shoulder(x, sabine) -> Waffle(sabine, idaline)) -> therefore Waffle(sabine, idaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The edyth discolor the paloma. The gleda auctioneer the edyth. The gleda is despotical. The gleda discolor the niki. The paloma beset the edyth. The paloma is unguided. The niki beset the edyth. The niki is phrenetic. The niki is withering. The niki discolor the gleda. If someone is unguided and they like the paloma then the paloma auctioneer the edyth. If someone is despotical and hourlong then they eat the gleda. If someone auctioneer the gleda then they eat the gleda. If someone beset the paloma and they eat the edyth then they like the edyth. If someone auctioneer the niki then the niki beset the paloma. If someone is phrenetic then they chase the niki. If someone beset the gleda then the gleda auctioneer the niki. If someone auctioneer the edyth then the edyth is hourlong. The niki does not eat the gleda.", "logic": "\nDiscolor(edyth, paloma)\nAuctioneer(gleda, edyth)\nDespotical(gleda)\nDiscolor(gleda, niki)\nBeset(paloma, edyth)\nUnguided(paloma)\nBeset(niki, edyth)\nPhrenetic(niki)\nWithering(niki)\nDiscolor(niki, gleda)\nforall x (Unguided(x) and Discolor(x, paloma) -> Auctioneer(paloma, edyth))\nforall x (Despotical(x) and Hourlong(x) -> Beset(x, gleda))\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, gleda) -> Beset(x, gleda))\nforall x (Beset(x, paloma) and Beset(x, edyth) -> Discolor(x, edyth))\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, niki) -> Beset(niki, paloma))\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) -> Auctioneer(x, niki))\nforall x (Beset(x, gleda) -> Auctioneer(gleda, niki))\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, edyth) -> Hourlong(edyth))\n\nnot Beset(niki, gleda)\n\nforall x (Despotical(x) and Hourlong(x) -> Beset(x, gleda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The charin poison the galina. The leila abate the charin. The leila is jittery. The leila poison the page. The galina shred the charin. The galina is thirdhand. The page shred the charin. The page is wrenching. The page is earthborn. The page poison the leila. If someone is thirdhand and they like the galina then the galina abate the charin. If someone is jittery and tenfold then they eat the leila. If someone abate the leila then they eat the leila. If someone shred the galina and they eat the charin then they like the charin. If someone abate the page then the page shred the galina. If someone is wrenching then they chase the page. If someone shred the leila then the leila abate the page. If someone abate the charin then the charin is tenfold. The leila abate the page.", "logic": "\nPoison(charin, galina)\nAbate(leila, charin)\nJittery(leila)\nPoison(leila, page)\nShred(galina, charin)\nThirdhand(galina)\nShred(page, charin)\nWrenching(page)\nEarthborn(page)\nPoison(page, leila)\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) and Poison(x, galina) -> Abate(galina, charin))\nforall x (Jittery(x) and Tenfold(x) -> Shred(x, leila))\nforall x (Abate(x, leila) -> Shred(x, leila))\nforall x (Shred(x, galina) and Shred(x, charin) -> Poison(x, charin))\nforall x (Abate(x, page) -> Shred(page, galina))\nforall x (Wrenching(x) -> Abate(x, page))\nforall x (Shred(x, leila) -> Abate(leila, page))\nforall x (Abate(x, charin) -> Tenfold(charin))\n\nAbate(leila, page)\n\nforall x (Shred(x, leila) -> Abate(leila, page)) <- forall x (Jittery(x) and Tenfold(x) -> Shred(x, leila)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The lamar exuberate the lew. The lauralee allot the lamar. The lauralee is fourhanded. The lauralee exuberate the laurance. The lew ramp the lamar. The lew is spellbound. The laurance ramp the lamar. The laurance is pyaemic. The laurance is mexican. The laurance exuberate the lauralee. If someone is spellbound and they like the lew then the lew allot the lamar. If someone is fourhanded and extravert then they eat the lauralee. If someone allot the lauralee then they eat the lauralee. If someone ramp the lew and they eat the lamar then they like the lamar. If someone allot the laurance then the laurance ramp the lew. If someone is pyaemic then they chase the laurance. If someone ramp the lauralee then the lauralee allot the laurance. If someone allot the lamar then the lamar is extravert. The lauralee does not eat the lauralee.", "logic": "\nExuberate(lamar, lew)\nAllot(lauralee, lamar)\nFourhanded(lauralee)\nExuberate(lauralee, laurance)\nRamp(lew, lamar)\nSpellbound(lew)\nRamp(laurance, lamar)\nPyaemic(laurance)\nMexican(laurance)\nExuberate(laurance, lauralee)\nforall x (Spellbound(x) and Exuberate(x, lew) -> Allot(lew, lamar))\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) and Extravert(x) -> Ramp(x, lauralee))\nforall x (Allot(x, lauralee) -> Ramp(x, lauralee))\nforall x (Ramp(x, lew) and Ramp(x, lamar) -> Exuberate(x, lamar))\nforall x (Allot(x, laurance) -> Ramp(laurance, lew))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Allot(x, laurance))\nforall x (Ramp(x, lauralee) -> Allot(lauralee, laurance))\nforall x (Allot(x, lamar) -> Extravert(lamar))\n\nnot Ramp(lauralee, lauralee)\n\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) and Extravert(x) -> Ramp(x, lauralee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The irma satirize the jana. The blanch bend the irma. The blanch is adust. The blanch satirize the odele. The jana assign the irma. The jana is meteoric. The odele assign the irma. The odele is trackable. The odele is exalted. The odele satirize the blanch. If someone is meteoric and they like the jana then the jana bend the irma. If someone is adust and expedient then they eat the blanch. If someone bend the blanch then they eat the blanch. If someone assign the jana and they eat the irma then they like the irma. If someone bend the odele then the odele assign the jana. If someone is trackable then they chase the odele. If someone assign the blanch then the blanch bend the odele. If someone bend the irma then the irma is expedient. The irma is adust.", "logic": "\nSatirize(irma, jana)\nBend(blanch, irma)\nAdust(blanch)\nSatirize(blanch, odele)\nAssign(jana, irma)\nMeteoric(jana)\nAssign(odele, irma)\nTrackable(odele)\nExalted(odele)\nSatirize(odele, blanch)\nforall x (Meteoric(x) and Satirize(x, jana) -> Bend(jana, irma))\nforall x (Adust(x) and Expedient(x) -> Assign(x, blanch))\nforall x (Bend(x, blanch) -> Assign(x, blanch))\nforall x (Assign(x, jana) and Assign(x, irma) -> Satirize(x, irma))\nforall x (Bend(x, odele) -> Assign(odele, jana))\nforall x (Trackable(x) -> Bend(x, odele))\nforall x (Assign(x, blanch) -> Bend(blanch, odele))\nforall x (Bend(x, irma) -> Expedient(irma))\n\nAdust(irma)\n\nAdust(irma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The ettie desquamate the willey. The giovanni caramelise the ettie. The giovanni is exempt. The giovanni desquamate the elle. The willey mount the ettie. The willey is starchy. The elle mount the ettie. The elle is honourable. The elle is groping. The elle desquamate the giovanni. If someone is starchy and they like the willey then the willey caramelise the ettie. If someone is exempt and jangly then they eat the giovanni. If someone caramelise the giovanni then they eat the giovanni. If someone mount the willey and they eat the ettie then they like the ettie. If someone caramelise the elle then the elle mount the willey. If someone is honourable then they chase the elle. If someone mount the giovanni then the giovanni caramelise the elle. If someone caramelise the ettie then the ettie is jangly. The elle does not like the elle.", "logic": "\nDesquamate(ettie, willey)\nCaramelise(giovanni, ettie)\nExempt(giovanni)\nDesquamate(giovanni, elle)\nMount(willey, ettie)\nStarchy(willey)\nMount(elle, ettie)\nHonourable(elle)\nGroping(elle)\nDesquamate(elle, giovanni)\nforall x (Starchy(x) and Desquamate(x, willey) -> Caramelise(willey, ettie))\nforall x (Exempt(x) and Jangly(x) -> Mount(x, giovanni))\nforall x (Caramelise(x, giovanni) -> Mount(x, giovanni))\nforall x (Mount(x, willey) and Mount(x, ettie) -> Desquamate(x, ettie))\nforall x (Caramelise(x, elle) -> Mount(elle, willey))\nforall x (Honourable(x) -> Caramelise(x, elle))\nforall x (Mount(x, giovanni) -> Caramelise(giovanni, elle))\nforall x (Caramelise(x, ettie) -> Jangly(ettie))\n\nnot Desquamate(elle, elle)\n\nnot Desquamate(elle, elle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "The pepi syllabify the kara. The ron sled the pepi. The ron is genetical. The ron syllabify the shawna. The kara busy the pepi. The kara is pleasing. The shawna busy the pepi. The shawna is schmaltzy. The shawna is prostate. The shawna syllabify the ron. If someone is pleasing and they like the kara then the kara sled the pepi. If someone is genetical and euphonic then they eat the ron. If someone sled the ron then they eat the ron. If someone busy the kara and they eat the pepi then they like the pepi. If someone sled the shawna then the shawna busy the kara. If someone is schmaltzy then they chase the shawna. If someone busy the ron then the ron sled the shawna. If someone sled the pepi then the pepi is euphonic. The shawna is pleasing.", "logic": "\nSyllabify(pepi, kara)\nSled(ron, pepi)\nGenetical(ron)\nSyllabify(ron, shawna)\nBusy(kara, pepi)\nPleasing(kara)\nBusy(shawna, pepi)\nSchmaltzy(shawna)\nProstate(shawna)\nSyllabify(shawna, ron)\nforall x (Pleasing(x) and Syllabify(x, kara) -> Sled(kara, pepi))\nforall x (Genetical(x) and Euphonic(x) -> Busy(x, ron))\nforall x (Sled(x, ron) -> Busy(x, ron))\nforall x (Busy(x, kara) and Busy(x, pepi) -> Syllabify(x, pepi))\nforall x (Sled(x, shawna) -> Busy(shawna, kara))\nforall x (Schmaltzy(x) -> Sled(x, shawna))\nforall x (Busy(x, ron) -> Sled(ron, shawna))\nforall x (Sled(x, pepi) -> Euphonic(pepi))\n\nPleasing(shawna)\n\nPleasing(shawna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1245"} {"premises": "Lari is starved. Sammie is lviii. Orella is lviii. All campanular things are not inhibited. If something is lviii then it is campanular. Orella is lviii.", "logic": "\nStarved(lari)\nLviii(sammie)\nLviii(orella)\nforall x (Campanular(x) -> not Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Lviii(x) -> Campanular(x))\n\nLviii(orella)\n\ntherefore Lviii(orella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Sallyanne is adapted. Leia is excusable. Lemuel is excusable. All hired things are not indoor. If something is excusable then it is hired. Sallyanne is not adapted.", "logic": "\nAdapted(sallyanne)\nExcusable(leia)\nExcusable(lemuel)\nforall x (Hired(x) -> not Indoor(x))\nforall x (Excusable(x) -> Hired(x))\n\nnot Adapted(sallyanne)\n\ntherefore Adapted(sallyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Margalit is hotheaded. Penn is strep. Spence is strep. All lamplit things are not incisive. If something is strep then it is lamplit. Spence is lamplit.", "logic": "\nHotheaded(margalit)\nStrep(penn)\nStrep(spence)\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> not Incisive(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Lamplit(x))\n\nLamplit(spence)\n\nStrep(spence) and forall x (Strep(x) -> Lamplit(x)) -> therefore Lamplit(spence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Fancie is cortical. Melania is appealable. Brady is appealable. All thyroid things are not unobliging. If something is appealable then it is thyroid. Brady is not thyroid.", "logic": "\nCortical(fancie)\nAppealable(melania)\nAppealable(brady)\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> not Unobliging(x))\nforall x (Appealable(x) -> Thyroid(x))\n\nnot Thyroid(brady)\n\nAppealable(brady) and forall x (Appealable(x) -> Thyroid(x)) -> therefore Thyroid(brady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Ramsay is sissyish. Gerti is flagitious. Giffie is flagitious. All ecumenical things are not impeded. If something is flagitious then it is ecumenical. Giffie is not impeded.", "logic": "\nSissyish(ramsay)\nFlagitious(gerti)\nFlagitious(giffie)\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) -> not Impeded(x))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) -> Ecumenical(x))\n\nnot Impeded(giffie)\n\nFlagitious(giffie) and forall x (Flagitious(x) -> Ecumenical(x)) -> therefore Ecumenical(giffie) Ecumenical(giffie) and forall x (Ecumenical(x) -> not Impeded(x)) -> therefore not Impeded(giffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Agnes is ammino. Sofie is plundered. Sylvan is plundered. All interred things are not abroach. If something is plundered then it is interred. Sofie is abroach.", "logic": "\nAmmino(agnes)\nPlundered(sofie)\nPlundered(sylvan)\nforall x (Interred(x) -> not Abroach(x))\nforall x (Plundered(x) -> Interred(x))\n\nAbroach(sofie)\n\nPlundered(sofie) and forall x (Plundered(x) -> Interred(x)) -> therefore Interred(sofie) Interred(sofie) and forall x (Interred(x) -> not Abroach(x)) -> therefore not Abroach(sofie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Emogene is civilised. Starr is payable. Ilyse is payable. All unmilitary things are not harried. If something is payable then it is unmilitary. Emogene is not unmilitary.", "logic": "\nCivilised(emogene)\nPayable(starr)\nPayable(ilyse)\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) -> not Harried(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\n\nnot Unmilitary(emogene)\n\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Unmilitary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Josepha is missionary. Marcio is barbaric. Ezra is barbaric. All desiccated things are not manageable. If something is barbaric then it is desiccated. Josepha is blue.", "logic": "\nMissionary(josepha)\nBarbaric(marcio)\nBarbaric(ezra)\nforall x (Desiccated(x) -> not Manageable(x))\nforall x (Barbaric(x) -> Desiccated(x))\n\nBlue(josepha)\n\nBlue(josepha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Cherrita is able. Marian is alien. Valida is alien. All habited things are not allylic. If something is alien then it is habited. Cherrita is not alien.", "logic": "\nAble(cherrita)\nAlien(marian)\nAlien(valida)\nforall x (Habited(x) -> not Allylic(x))\nforall x (Alien(x) -> Habited(x))\n\nnot Alien(cherrita)\n\nnot Alien(cherrita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Auroora is flagitious. Netta is thermal. Hortense is thermal. All rapid things are not oriented. If something is thermal then it is rapid. Netta is furry.", "logic": "\nFlagitious(auroora)\nThermal(netta)\nThermal(hortense)\nforall x (Rapid(x) -> not Oriented(x))\nforall x (Thermal(x) -> Rapid(x))\n\nFurry(netta)\n\nFurry(netta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Sybil is married. Harli is unifoliate. Maureen is unifoliate. All longhand things are not javan. If something is unifoliate then it is longhand. Maureen is not married.", "logic": "\nMarried(sybil)\nUnifoliate(harli)\nUnifoliate(maureen)\nforall x (Longhand(x) -> not Javan(x))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Longhand(x))\n\nnot Married(maureen)\n\nnot Married(maureen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Imogen is martial. Teador is amygdaline. Corabella is amygdaline. All meddlesome things are not epicyclic. If something is amygdaline then it is meddlesome. Corabella is blue.", "logic": "\nMartial(imogen)\nAmygdaline(teador)\nAmygdaline(corabella)\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) -> not Epicyclic(x))\nforall x (Amygdaline(x) -> Meddlesome(x))\n\nBlue(corabella)\n\nBlue(corabella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1152"} {"premises": "Kasey is avoidable. Jinny is redemptory. Rhea is aging. Dolly is avoidable. Kind people are redemptory. If Kasey is tripinnate and Kasey is redemptory then Kasey is insecure. Red people are tripinnate. Kasey is avoidable.", "logic": "\nAvoidable(kasey)\nRedemptory(jinny)\nAging(rhea)\nAvoidable(dolly)\nforall x (Avoidable(x) -> Redemptory(x))\nTripinnate(kasey) and Redemptory(kasey) -> Insecure(kasey)\nforall x (Redemptory(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\n\nAvoidable(kasey)\n\ntherefore Avoidable(kasey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Vilma is totipotent. Zebedee is cliched. Auria is bosomy. Emelita is totipotent. Kind people are cliched. If Vilma is chopfallen and Vilma is cliched then Vilma is inveterate. Red people are chopfallen. Auria is not bosomy.", "logic": "\nTotipotent(vilma)\nCliched(zebedee)\nBosomy(auria)\nTotipotent(emelita)\nforall x (Totipotent(x) -> Cliched(x))\nChopfallen(vilma) and Cliched(vilma) -> Inveterate(vilma)\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Chopfallen(x))\n\nnot Bosomy(auria)\n\ntherefore Bosomy(auria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Jackson is corbelled. Melania is granulated. Wake is lipless. Lonny is corbelled. Kind people are granulated. If Jackson is ophthalmic and Jackson is granulated then Jackson is bubbling. Red people are ophthalmic. Lonny is granulated.", "logic": "\nCorbelled(jackson)\nGranulated(melania)\nLipless(wake)\nCorbelled(lonny)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Granulated(x))\nOphthalmic(jackson) and Granulated(jackson) -> Bubbling(jackson)\nforall x (Granulated(x) -> Ophthalmic(x))\n\nGranulated(lonny)\n\nCorbelled(lonny) and forall x (Corbelled(x) -> Granulated(x)) -> therefore Granulated(lonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Catina is envious. Leonora is ovine. Davida is castled. Gabriella is envious. Kind people are ovine. If Catina is bibulous and Catina is ovine then Catina is memberless. Red people are bibulous. Leonora is not bibulous.", "logic": "\nEnvious(catina)\nOvine(leonora)\nCastled(davida)\nEnvious(gabriella)\nforall x (Envious(x) -> Ovine(x))\nBibulous(catina) and Ovine(catina) -> Memberless(catina)\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> Bibulous(x))\n\nnot Bibulous(leonora)\n\nOvine(leonora) and forall x (Ovine(x) -> Bibulous(x)) -> therefore Bibulous(leonora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Kimbra is damning. Janeva is prehensile. Georgie is beatific. Averell is damning. Kind people are prehensile. If Kimbra is spheric and Kimbra is prehensile then Kimbra is granitic. Red people are spheric. Averell is spheric.", "logic": "\nDamning(kimbra)\nPrehensile(janeva)\nBeatific(georgie)\nDamning(averell)\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Prehensile(x))\nSpheric(kimbra) and Prehensile(kimbra) -> Granitic(kimbra)\nforall x (Prehensile(x) -> Spheric(x))\n\nSpheric(averell)\n\nDamning(averell) and forall x (Damning(x) -> Prehensile(x)) -> therefore Prehensile(averell) Prehensile(averell) and forall x (Prehensile(x) -> Spheric(x)) -> therefore Spheric(averell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Harrietta is nautical. Marena is earlyish. Brandea is unique. Rodge is nautical. Kind people are earlyish. If Harrietta is creole and Harrietta is earlyish then Harrietta is windburnt. Red people are creole. Rodge is not creole.", "logic": "\nNautical(harrietta)\nEarlyish(marena)\nUnique(brandea)\nNautical(rodge)\nforall x (Nautical(x) -> Earlyish(x))\nCreole(harrietta) and Earlyish(harrietta) -> Windburnt(harrietta)\nforall x (Earlyish(x) -> Creole(x))\n\nnot Creole(rodge)\n\nNautical(rodge) and forall x (Nautical(x) -> Earlyish(x)) -> therefore Earlyish(rodge) Earlyish(rodge) and forall x (Earlyish(x) -> Creole(x)) -> therefore Creole(rodge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Lotta is cool. Mimi is corking. Farley is jeweled. Jerrie is cool. Kind people are corking. If Lotta is swelled and Lotta is corking then Lotta is superb. Red people are swelled. Farley is not corking.", "logic": "\nCool(lotta)\nCorking(mimi)\nJeweled(farley)\nCool(jerrie)\nforall x (Cool(x) -> Corking(x))\nSwelled(lotta) and Corking(lotta) -> Superb(lotta)\nforall x (Corking(x) -> Swelled(x))\n\nnot Corking(farley)\n\nforall x (Cool(x) -> Corking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Alexis is boxy. Brigid is approving. Ardith is capsulated. Cinda is boxy. Kind people are approving. If Alexis is naval and Alexis is approving then Alexis is amenable. Red people are naval. Ardith is naval.", "logic": "\nBoxy(alexis)\nApproving(brigid)\nCapsulated(ardith)\nBoxy(cinda)\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Approving(x))\nNaval(alexis) and Approving(alexis) -> Amenable(alexis)\nforall x (Approving(x) -> Naval(x))\n\nNaval(ardith)\n\nforall x (Approving(x) -> Naval(x)) <- forall x (Boxy(x) -> Approving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Phillis is irascible. Therese is inculpable. Jorrie is cragfast. Fredelia is irascible. Kind people are inculpable. If Phillis is loony and Phillis is inculpable then Phillis is bentonitic. Red people are loony. Phillis is not cragfast.", "logic": "\nIrascible(phillis)\nInculpable(therese)\nCragfast(jorrie)\nIrascible(fredelia)\nforall x (Irascible(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nLoony(phillis) and Inculpable(phillis) -> Bentonitic(phillis)\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> Loony(x))\n\nnot Cragfast(phillis)\n\nnot Cragfast(phillis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Jade is prodromic. Adger is giving. Carli is glib. Mildrid is prodromic. Kind people are giving. If Jade is ulcerative and Jade is giving then Jade is stormbound. Red people are ulcerative. Carli is prodromic.", "logic": "\nProdromic(jade)\nGiving(adger)\nGlib(carli)\nProdromic(mildrid)\nforall x (Prodromic(x) -> Giving(x))\nUlcerative(jade) and Giving(jade) -> Stormbound(jade)\nforall x (Giving(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\n\nProdromic(carli)\n\nProdromic(carli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Lysandra is papillose. Helise is elfin. Johnathon is peccant. Seymour is papillose. Kind people are elfin. If Lysandra is multiple and Lysandra is elfin then Lysandra is oblong. Red people are multiple. Helise is not rough.", "logic": "\nPapillose(lysandra)\nElfin(helise)\nPeccant(johnathon)\nPapillose(seymour)\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Elfin(x))\nMultiple(lysandra) and Elfin(lysandra) -> Oblong(lysandra)\nforall x (Elfin(x) -> Multiple(x))\n\nnot Rough(helise)\n\nnot Rough(helise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "Mohamed is provable. Randell is vindictive. Trudie is involved. Vachel is provable. Kind people are vindictive. If Mohamed is hebdomadal and Mohamed is vindictive then Mohamed is coriaceous. Red people are hebdomadal. Vachel is rough.", "logic": "\nProvable(mohamed)\nVindictive(randell)\nInvolved(trudie)\nProvable(vachel)\nforall x (Provable(x) -> Vindictive(x))\nHebdomadal(mohamed) and Vindictive(mohamed) -> Coriaceous(mohamed)\nforall x (Vindictive(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\n\nRough(vachel)\n\nRough(vachel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-266"} {"premises": "The deb thrum the sharna. The deb is urinary. The deb is bicapsular. The deb is restful. The deb colourize the oren. The sharna is carolean. The sharna colourize the oren. The sharna homestead the oren. The oren thrum the deb. The oren is bicapsular. The oren colourize the sharna. The oren homestead the sharna. If someone is urinary and they eat the deb then the deb homestead the sharna. If someone is bicapsular then they eat the deb. The sharna is carolean.", "logic": "\nThrum(deb, sharna)\nUrinary(deb)\nBicapsular(deb)\nRestful(deb)\nColourize(deb, oren)\nCarolean(sharna)\nColourize(sharna, oren)\nHomestead(sharna, oren)\nThrum(oren, deb)\nBicapsular(oren)\nColourize(oren, sharna)\nHomestead(oren, sharna)\nforall x (Urinary(x) and Thrum(x, deb) -> Homestead(deb, sharna))\nforall x (Bicapsular(x) -> Thrum(x, deb))\n\nCarolean(sharna)\n\ntherefore Carolean(sharna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The gerome incite the godfree. The gerome is motorless. The gerome is sunstruck. The gerome is indicatory. The gerome unify the herve. The godfree is sikh. The godfree unify the herve. The godfree strain the herve. The herve incite the gerome. The herve is sunstruck. The herve unify the godfree. The herve strain the godfree. If someone is motorless and they eat the gerome then the gerome strain the godfree. If someone is sunstruck then they eat the gerome. The godfree does not visit the herve.", "logic": "\nIncite(gerome, godfree)\nMotorless(gerome)\nSunstruck(gerome)\nIndicatory(gerome)\nUnify(gerome, herve)\nSikh(godfree)\nUnify(godfree, herve)\nStrain(godfree, herve)\nIncite(herve, gerome)\nSunstruck(herve)\nUnify(herve, godfree)\nStrain(herve, godfree)\nforall x (Motorless(x) and Incite(x, gerome) -> Strain(gerome, godfree))\nforall x (Sunstruck(x) -> Incite(x, gerome))\n\nnot Strain(godfree, herve)\n\ntherefore Strain(godfree, herve)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The lethia point the joel. The lethia is hazel. The lethia is manful. The lethia is forced. The lethia crisscross the linnie. The joel is blithe. The joel crisscross the linnie. The joel marry the linnie. The linnie point the lethia. The linnie is manful. The linnie crisscross the joel. The linnie marry the joel. If someone is hazel and they eat the lethia then the lethia marry the joel. If someone is manful then they eat the lethia. The lethia point the lethia.", "logic": "\nPoint(lethia, joel)\nHazel(lethia)\nManful(lethia)\nForced(lethia)\nCrisscross(lethia, linnie)\nBlithe(joel)\nCrisscross(joel, linnie)\nMarry(joel, linnie)\nPoint(linnie, lethia)\nManful(linnie)\nCrisscross(linnie, joel)\nMarry(linnie, joel)\nforall x (Hazel(x) and Point(x, lethia) -> Marry(lethia, joel))\nforall x (Manful(x) -> Point(x, lethia))\n\nPoint(lethia, lethia)\n\nManful(lethia) and forall x (Manful(x) -> Point(x, lethia)) -> therefore Point(lethia, lethia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The tamarra sizz the rafaelita. The tamarra is signal. The tamarra is seven. The tamarra is buddhistic. The tamarra conserve the brett. The rafaelita is digestive. The rafaelita conserve the brett. The rafaelita struggle the brett. The brett sizz the tamarra. The brett is seven. The brett conserve the rafaelita. The brett struggle the rafaelita. If someone is signal and they eat the tamarra then the tamarra struggle the rafaelita. If someone is seven then they eat the tamarra. The tamarra does not eat the tamarra.", "logic": "\nSizz(tamarra, rafaelita)\nSignal(tamarra)\nSeven(tamarra)\nBuddhistic(tamarra)\nConserve(tamarra, brett)\nDigestive(rafaelita)\nConserve(rafaelita, brett)\nStruggle(rafaelita, brett)\nSizz(brett, tamarra)\nSeven(brett)\nConserve(brett, rafaelita)\nStruggle(brett, rafaelita)\nforall x (Signal(x) and Sizz(x, tamarra) -> Struggle(tamarra, rafaelita))\nforall x (Seven(x) -> Sizz(x, tamarra))\n\nnot Sizz(tamarra, tamarra)\n\nSeven(tamarra) and forall x (Seven(x) -> Sizz(x, tamarra)) -> therefore Sizz(tamarra, tamarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The cosmo yack the lynsey. The cosmo is myriad. The cosmo is hypertonic. The cosmo is plausive. The cosmo squint the magdaia. The lynsey is economical. The lynsey squint the magdaia. The lynsey depolarize the magdaia. The magdaia yack the cosmo. The magdaia is hypertonic. The magdaia squint the lynsey. The magdaia depolarize the lynsey. If someone is myriad and they eat the cosmo then the cosmo depolarize the lynsey. If someone is hypertonic then they eat the cosmo. The cosmo depolarize the lynsey.", "logic": "\nYack(cosmo, lynsey)\nMyriad(cosmo)\nHypertonic(cosmo)\nPlausive(cosmo)\nSquint(cosmo, magdaia)\nEconomical(lynsey)\nSquint(lynsey, magdaia)\nDepolarize(lynsey, magdaia)\nYack(magdaia, cosmo)\nHypertonic(magdaia)\nSquint(magdaia, lynsey)\nDepolarize(magdaia, lynsey)\nforall x (Myriad(x) and Yack(x, cosmo) -> Depolarize(cosmo, lynsey))\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Yack(x, cosmo))\n\nDepolarize(cosmo, lynsey)\n\nHypertonic(cosmo) and forall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Yack(x, cosmo)) -> therefore Yack(cosmo, cosmo) Myriad(cosmo) and Yack(cosmo, cosmo) and forall x (Myriad(x) and Yack(x, cosmo) -> Depolarize(cosmo, lynsey)) -> therefore Depolarize(cosmo, lynsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The sharra bodge the jeane. The sharra is crackers. The sharra is sorrowful. The sharra is rudderless. The sharra bawl the jilleen. The jeane is uptight. The jeane bawl the jilleen. The jeane retrench the jilleen. The jilleen bodge the sharra. The jilleen is sorrowful. The jilleen bawl the jeane. The jilleen retrench the jeane. If someone is crackers and they eat the sharra then the sharra retrench the jeane. If someone is sorrowful then they eat the sharra. The sharra does not visit the jeane.", "logic": "\nBodge(sharra, jeane)\nCrackers(sharra)\nSorrowful(sharra)\nRudderless(sharra)\nBawl(sharra, jilleen)\nUptight(jeane)\nBawl(jeane, jilleen)\nRetrench(jeane, jilleen)\nBodge(jilleen, sharra)\nSorrowful(jilleen)\nBawl(jilleen, jeane)\nRetrench(jilleen, jeane)\nforall x (Crackers(x) and Bodge(x, sharra) -> Retrench(sharra, jeane))\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) -> Bodge(x, sharra))\n\nnot Retrench(sharra, jeane)\n\nSorrowful(sharra) and forall x (Sorrowful(x) -> Bodge(x, sharra)) -> therefore Bodge(sharra, sharra) Crackers(sharra) and Bodge(sharra, sharra) and forall x (Crackers(x) and Bodge(x, sharra) -> Retrench(sharra, jeane)) -> therefore Retrench(sharra, jeane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The jessamyn snowball the avery. The jessamyn is volumed. The jessamyn is calendric. The jessamyn is monochrome. The jessamyn jackknife the casandra. The avery is awake. The avery jackknife the casandra. The avery gibbet the casandra. The casandra snowball the jessamyn. The casandra is calendric. The casandra jackknife the avery. The casandra gibbet the avery. If someone is volumed and they eat the jessamyn then the jessamyn gibbet the avery. If someone is calendric then they eat the jessamyn. The avery does not eat the jessamyn.", "logic": "\nSnowball(jessamyn, avery)\nVolumed(jessamyn)\nCalendric(jessamyn)\nMonochrome(jessamyn)\nJackknife(jessamyn, casandra)\nAwake(avery)\nJackknife(avery, casandra)\nGibbet(avery, casandra)\nSnowball(casandra, jessamyn)\nCalendric(casandra)\nJackknife(casandra, avery)\nGibbet(casandra, avery)\nforall x (Volumed(x) and Snowball(x, jessamyn) -> Gibbet(jessamyn, avery))\nforall x (Calendric(x) -> Snowball(x, jessamyn))\n\nnot Snowball(avery, jessamyn)\n\nforall x (Calendric(x) -> Snowball(x, jessamyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The morissa decontrol the waldon. The morissa is jungian. The morissa is mongoloid. The morissa is subaltern. The morissa rarify the derek. The waldon is misbegot. The waldon rarify the derek. The waldon overwork the derek. The derek decontrol the morissa. The derek is mongoloid. The derek rarify the waldon. The derek overwork the waldon. If someone is jungian and they eat the morissa then the morissa overwork the waldon. If someone is mongoloid then they eat the morissa. The waldon is subaltern.", "logic": "\nDecontrol(morissa, waldon)\nJungian(morissa)\nMongoloid(morissa)\nSubaltern(morissa)\nRarify(morissa, derek)\nMisbegot(waldon)\nRarify(waldon, derek)\nOverwork(waldon, derek)\nDecontrol(derek, morissa)\nMongoloid(derek)\nRarify(derek, waldon)\nOverwork(derek, waldon)\nforall x (Jungian(x) and Decontrol(x, morissa) -> Overwork(morissa, waldon))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Decontrol(x, morissa))\n\nSubaltern(waldon)\n\nSubaltern(waldon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The harris diversify the ransell. The harris is apposable. The harris is flukey. The harris is quaternate. The harris prattle the marthena. The ransell is arabian. The ransell prattle the marthena. The ransell demist the marthena. The marthena diversify the harris. The marthena is flukey. The marthena prattle the ransell. The marthena demist the ransell. If someone is apposable and they eat the harris then the harris demist the ransell. If someone is flukey then they eat the harris. The harris does not like the harris.", "logic": "\nDiversify(harris, ransell)\nApposable(harris)\nFlukey(harris)\nQuaternate(harris)\nPrattle(harris, marthena)\nArabian(ransell)\nPrattle(ransell, marthena)\nDemist(ransell, marthena)\nDiversify(marthena, harris)\nFlukey(marthena)\nPrattle(marthena, ransell)\nDemist(marthena, ransell)\nforall x (Apposable(x) and Diversify(x, harris) -> Demist(harris, ransell))\nforall x (Flukey(x) -> Diversify(x, harris))\n\nnot Prattle(harris, harris)\n\nnot Prattle(harris, harris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The benedikta replay the vinod. The benedikta is realizable. The benedikta is endozoic. The benedikta is phenomenal. The benedikta divagate the danelle. The vinod is parlous. The vinod divagate the danelle. The vinod nickel the danelle. The danelle replay the benedikta. The danelle is endozoic. The danelle divagate the vinod. The danelle nickel the vinod. If someone is realizable and they eat the benedikta then the benedikta nickel the vinod. If someone is endozoic then they eat the benedikta. The vinod is young.", "logic": "\nReplay(benedikta, vinod)\nRealizable(benedikta)\nEndozoic(benedikta)\nPhenomenal(benedikta)\nDivagate(benedikta, danelle)\nParlous(vinod)\nDivagate(vinod, danelle)\nNickel(vinod, danelle)\nReplay(danelle, benedikta)\nEndozoic(danelle)\nDivagate(danelle, vinod)\nNickel(danelle, vinod)\nforall x (Realizable(x) and Replay(x, benedikta) -> Nickel(benedikta, vinod))\nforall x (Endozoic(x) -> Replay(x, benedikta))\n\nYoung(vinod)\n\nYoung(vinod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The dieter maltreat the fancy. The dieter is phantasmal. The dieter is shriveled. The dieter is algoid. The dieter dandify the burton. The fancy is beguiling. The fancy dandify the burton. The fancy twaddle the burton. The burton maltreat the dieter. The burton is shriveled. The burton dandify the fancy. The burton twaddle the fancy. If someone is phantasmal and they eat the dieter then the dieter twaddle the fancy. If someone is shriveled then they eat the dieter. The burton does not like the dieter.", "logic": "\nMaltreat(dieter, fancy)\nPhantasmal(dieter)\nShriveled(dieter)\nAlgoid(dieter)\nDandify(dieter, burton)\nBeguiling(fancy)\nDandify(fancy, burton)\nTwaddle(fancy, burton)\nMaltreat(burton, dieter)\nShriveled(burton)\nDandify(burton, fancy)\nTwaddle(burton, fancy)\nforall x (Phantasmal(x) and Maltreat(x, dieter) -> Twaddle(dieter, fancy))\nforall x (Shriveled(x) -> Maltreat(x, dieter))\n\nnot Dandify(burton, dieter)\n\nnot Dandify(burton, dieter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "The robenia shorten the luana. The robenia is excited. The robenia is blastular. The robenia is vanished. The robenia calk the fran. The luana is discoid. The luana calk the fran. The luana whirligig the fran. The fran shorten the robenia. The fran is blastular. The fran calk the luana. The fran whirligig the luana. If someone is excited and they eat the robenia then the robenia whirligig the luana. If someone is blastular then they eat the robenia. The luana shorten the fran.", "logic": "\nShorten(robenia, luana)\nExcited(robenia)\nBlastular(robenia)\nVanished(robenia)\nCalk(robenia, fran)\nDiscoid(luana)\nCalk(luana, fran)\nWhirligig(luana, fran)\nShorten(fran, robenia)\nBlastular(fran)\nCalk(fran, luana)\nWhirligig(fran, luana)\nforall x (Excited(x) and Shorten(x, robenia) -> Whirligig(robenia, luana))\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Shorten(x, robenia))\n\nShorten(luana, fran)\n\nShorten(luana, fran) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1276"} {"premises": "Nora is cerebral. Nora is senescent. Nora is artesian. Nora is unalloyed. Tisha is cerebral. Tisha is senescent. Tisha is pushful. Tisha is unalloyed. Romeo is doped. Romeo is unalloyed. If Nora is artesian then Nora is pushful. If someone is cerebral and artesian then they are pushful. Red people are pushful. Big, artesian people are senescent. If someone is pushful then they are senescent. If someone is cerebral then they are prevenient. If Nora is senescent and Nora is prevenient then Nora is doped. If Romeo is senescent and Romeo is pushful then Romeo is doped. Nora is artesian.", "logic": "\nCerebral(nora)\nSenescent(nora)\nArtesian(nora)\nUnalloyed(nora)\nCerebral(tisha)\nSenescent(tisha)\nPushful(tisha)\nUnalloyed(tisha)\nDoped(romeo)\nUnalloyed(romeo)\nArtesian(nora) -> Pushful(nora)\nforall x (Cerebral(x) and Artesian(x) -> Pushful(x))\nforall x (Prevenient(x) -> Pushful(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) and Artesian(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Pushful(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nSenescent(nora) and Prevenient(nora) -> Doped(nora)\nSenescent(romeo) and Pushful(romeo) -> Doped(romeo)\n\nArtesian(nora)\n\ntherefore Artesian(nora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Pamella is dolourous. Pamella is arabic. Pamella is crimson. Pamella is tottering. Ramona is dolourous. Ramona is arabic. Ramona is grizzled. Ramona is tottering. Simone is baleful. Simone is tottering. If Pamella is crimson then Pamella is grizzled. If someone is dolourous and crimson then they are grizzled. Red people are grizzled. Big, crimson people are arabic. If someone is grizzled then they are arabic. If someone is dolourous then they are personal. If Pamella is arabic and Pamella is personal then Pamella is baleful. If Simone is arabic and Simone is grizzled then Simone is baleful. Simone is not baleful.", "logic": "\nDolourous(pamella)\nArabic(pamella)\nCrimson(pamella)\nTottering(pamella)\nDolourous(ramona)\nArabic(ramona)\nGrizzled(ramona)\nTottering(ramona)\nBaleful(simone)\nTottering(simone)\nCrimson(pamella) -> Grizzled(pamella)\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Crimson(x) -> Grizzled(x))\nforall x (Personal(x) -> Grizzled(x))\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Crimson(x) -> Arabic(x))\nforall x (Grizzled(x) -> Arabic(x))\nforall x (Dolourous(x) -> Personal(x))\nArabic(pamella) and Personal(pamella) -> Baleful(pamella)\nArabic(simone) and Grizzled(simone) -> Baleful(simone)\n\nnot Baleful(simone)\n\ntherefore Baleful(simone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Bellina is imposing. Bellina is disclosed. Bellina is inverted. Bellina is preventive. Dolley is imposing. Dolley is disclosed. Dolley is nuptial. Dolley is preventive. Harlan is unexploded. Harlan is preventive. If Bellina is inverted then Bellina is nuptial. If someone is imposing and inverted then they are nuptial. Red people are nuptial. Big, inverted people are disclosed. If someone is nuptial then they are disclosed. If someone is imposing then they are heraldist. If Bellina is disclosed and Bellina is heraldist then Bellina is unexploded. If Harlan is disclosed and Harlan is nuptial then Harlan is unexploded. Bellina is nuptial.", "logic": "\nImposing(bellina)\nDisclosed(bellina)\nInverted(bellina)\nPreventive(bellina)\nImposing(dolley)\nDisclosed(dolley)\nNuptial(dolley)\nPreventive(dolley)\nUnexploded(harlan)\nPreventive(harlan)\nInverted(bellina) -> Nuptial(bellina)\nforall x (Imposing(x) and Inverted(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) and Inverted(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nDisclosed(bellina) and Heraldist(bellina) -> Unexploded(bellina)\nDisclosed(harlan) and Nuptial(harlan) -> Unexploded(harlan)\n\nNuptial(bellina)\n\nInverted(bellina) and Inverted(bellina) -> Nuptial(bellina) -> therefore Nuptial(bellina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Amadeus is more. Amadeus is voguish. Amadeus is grotesque. Amadeus is distraught. Aubry is more. Aubry is voguish. Aubry is echoless. Aubry is distraught. Len is livelong. Len is distraught. If Amadeus is grotesque then Amadeus is echoless. If someone is more and grotesque then they are echoless. Red people are echoless. Big, grotesque people are voguish. If someone is echoless then they are voguish. If someone is more then they are patriotic. If Amadeus is voguish and Amadeus is patriotic then Amadeus is livelong. If Len is voguish and Len is echoless then Len is livelong. Aubry is not patriotic.", "logic": "\nMore(amadeus)\nVoguish(amadeus)\nGrotesque(amadeus)\nDistraught(amadeus)\nMore(aubry)\nVoguish(aubry)\nEcholess(aubry)\nDistraught(aubry)\nLivelong(len)\nDistraught(len)\nGrotesque(amadeus) -> Echoless(amadeus)\nforall x (More(x) and Grotesque(x) -> Echoless(x))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) -> Echoless(x))\nforall x (More(x) and Grotesque(x) -> Voguish(x))\nforall x (Echoless(x) -> Voguish(x))\nforall x (More(x) -> Patriotic(x))\nVoguish(amadeus) and Patriotic(amadeus) -> Livelong(amadeus)\nVoguish(len) and Echoless(len) -> Livelong(len)\n\nnot Patriotic(aubry)\n\nMore(aubry) and forall x (More(x) -> Patriotic(x)) -> therefore Patriotic(aubry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Geraldine is leaden. Geraldine is ternate. Geraldine is agreeable. Geraldine is unsatiated. Wolfy is leaden. Wolfy is ternate. Wolfy is unpointed. Wolfy is unsatiated. Corella is monoclonal. Corella is unsatiated. If Geraldine is agreeable then Geraldine is unpointed. If someone is leaden and agreeable then they are unpointed. Red people are unpointed. Big, agreeable people are ternate. If someone is unpointed then they are ternate. If someone is leaden then they are imitation. If Geraldine is ternate and Geraldine is imitation then Geraldine is monoclonal. If Corella is ternate and Corella is unpointed then Corella is monoclonal. Geraldine is monoclonal.", "logic": "\nLeaden(geraldine)\nTernate(geraldine)\nAgreeable(geraldine)\nUnsatiated(geraldine)\nLeaden(wolfy)\nTernate(wolfy)\nUnpointed(wolfy)\nUnsatiated(wolfy)\nMonoclonal(corella)\nUnsatiated(corella)\nAgreeable(geraldine) -> Unpointed(geraldine)\nforall x (Leaden(x) and Agreeable(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Imitation(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Leaden(x) and Agreeable(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Leaden(x) -> Imitation(x))\nTernate(geraldine) and Imitation(geraldine) -> Monoclonal(geraldine)\nTernate(corella) and Unpointed(corella) -> Monoclonal(corella)\n\nMonoclonal(geraldine)\n\nLeaden(geraldine) and forall x (Leaden(x) -> Imitation(x)) -> therefore Imitation(geraldine) Ternate(geraldine) and Imitation(geraldine) and Ternate(geraldine) and Imitation(geraldine) -> Monoclonal(geraldine) -> therefore Monoclonal(geraldine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Nathalie is springlike. Nathalie is buttoned. Nathalie is blithesome. Nathalie is lobate. Weslie is springlike. Weslie is buttoned. Weslie is ostensive. Weslie is lobate. Krystyna is kookie. Krystyna is lobate. If Nathalie is blithesome then Nathalie is ostensive. If someone is springlike and blithesome then they are ostensive. Red people are ostensive. Big, blithesome people are buttoned. If someone is ostensive then they are buttoned. If someone is springlike then they are sluttish. If Nathalie is buttoned and Nathalie is sluttish then Nathalie is kookie. If Krystyna is buttoned and Krystyna is ostensive then Krystyna is kookie. Nathalie is not kookie.", "logic": "\nSpringlike(nathalie)\nButtoned(nathalie)\nBlithesome(nathalie)\nLobate(nathalie)\nSpringlike(weslie)\nButtoned(weslie)\nOstensive(weslie)\nLobate(weslie)\nKookie(krystyna)\nLobate(krystyna)\nBlithesome(nathalie) -> Ostensive(nathalie)\nforall x (Springlike(x) and Blithesome(x) -> Ostensive(x))\nforall x (Sluttish(x) -> Ostensive(x))\nforall x (Springlike(x) and Blithesome(x) -> Buttoned(x))\nforall x (Ostensive(x) -> Buttoned(x))\nforall x (Springlike(x) -> Sluttish(x))\nButtoned(nathalie) and Sluttish(nathalie) -> Kookie(nathalie)\nButtoned(krystyna) and Ostensive(krystyna) -> Kookie(krystyna)\n\nnot Kookie(nathalie)\n\nSpringlike(nathalie) and forall x (Springlike(x) -> Sluttish(x)) -> therefore Sluttish(nathalie) Buttoned(nathalie) and Sluttish(nathalie) and Buttoned(nathalie) and Sluttish(nathalie) -> Kookie(nathalie) -> therefore Kookie(nathalie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Roman is tactical. Roman is horny. Roman is largo. Roman is alto. Barnebas is tactical. Barnebas is horny. Barnebas is amnesiac. Barnebas is alto. Shurlocke is endodontic. Shurlocke is alto. If Roman is largo then Roman is amnesiac. If someone is tactical and largo then they are amnesiac. Red people are amnesiac. Big, largo people are horny. If someone is amnesiac then they are horny. If someone is tactical then they are crackle. If Roman is horny and Roman is crackle then Roman is endodontic. If Shurlocke is horny and Shurlocke is amnesiac then Shurlocke is endodontic. Shurlocke is not crackle.", "logic": "\nTactical(roman)\nHorny(roman)\nLargo(roman)\nAlto(roman)\nTactical(barnebas)\nHorny(barnebas)\nAmnesiac(barnebas)\nAlto(barnebas)\nEndodontic(shurlocke)\nAlto(shurlocke)\nLargo(roman) -> Amnesiac(roman)\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Largo(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Crackle(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Largo(x) -> Horny(x))\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) -> Horny(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Crackle(x))\nHorny(roman) and Crackle(roman) -> Endodontic(roman)\nHorny(shurlocke) and Amnesiac(shurlocke) -> Endodontic(shurlocke)\n\nnot Crackle(shurlocke)\n\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Crackle(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Tamma is festal. Tamma is prostyle. Tamma is unfading. Tamma is animated. Con is festal. Con is prostyle. Con is conserved. Con is animated. Prasun is thousandth. Prasun is animated. If Tamma is unfading then Tamma is conserved. If someone is festal and unfading then they are conserved. Red people are conserved. Big, unfading people are prostyle. If someone is conserved then they are prostyle. If someone is festal then they are ordained. If Tamma is prostyle and Tamma is ordained then Tamma is thousandth. If Prasun is prostyle and Prasun is conserved then Prasun is thousandth. Prasun is conserved.", "logic": "\nFestal(tamma)\nProstyle(tamma)\nUnfading(tamma)\nAnimated(tamma)\nFestal(con)\nProstyle(con)\nConserved(con)\nAnimated(con)\nThousandth(prasun)\nAnimated(prasun)\nUnfading(tamma) -> Conserved(tamma)\nforall x (Festal(x) and Unfading(x) -> Conserved(x))\nforall x (Ordained(x) -> Conserved(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and Unfading(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) -> Ordained(x))\nProstyle(tamma) and Ordained(tamma) -> Thousandth(tamma)\nProstyle(prasun) and Conserved(prasun) -> Thousandth(prasun)\n\nConserved(prasun)\n\nforall x (Ordained(x) -> Conserved(x)) <- forall x (Festal(x) -> Ordained(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Aggy is burning. Aggy is arco. Aggy is graduated. Aggy is nescient. Rex is burning. Rex is arco. Rex is xlii. Rex is nescient. Bekki is cute. Bekki is nescient. If Aggy is graduated then Aggy is xlii. If someone is burning and graduated then they are xlii. Red people are xlii. Big, graduated people are arco. If someone is xlii then they are arco. If someone is burning then they are extraneous. If Aggy is arco and Aggy is extraneous then Aggy is cute. If Bekki is arco and Bekki is xlii then Bekki is cute. Bekki is not arco.", "logic": "\nBurning(aggy)\nArco(aggy)\nGraduated(aggy)\nNescient(aggy)\nBurning(rex)\nArco(rex)\nXlii(rex)\nNescient(rex)\nCute(bekki)\nNescient(bekki)\nGraduated(aggy) -> Xlii(aggy)\nforall x (Burning(x) and Graduated(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Burning(x) and Graduated(x) -> Arco(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Arco(x))\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Extraneous(x))\nArco(aggy) and Extraneous(aggy) -> Cute(aggy)\nArco(bekki) and Xlii(bekki) -> Cute(bekki)\n\nnot Arco(bekki)\n\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Arco(x)) <- forall x (Extraneous(x) -> Xlii(x)) <- forall x (Burning(x) -> Extraneous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Brandice is slanting. Brandice is blind. Brandice is commanding. Brandice is smallish. Lynnell is slanting. Lynnell is blind. Lynnell is palpitant. Lynnell is smallish. Phyllida is appareled. Phyllida is smallish. If Brandice is commanding then Brandice is palpitant. If someone is slanting and commanding then they are palpitant. Red people are palpitant. Big, commanding people are blind. If someone is palpitant then they are blind. If someone is slanting then they are errant. If Brandice is blind and Brandice is errant then Brandice is appareled. If Phyllida is blind and Phyllida is palpitant then Phyllida is appareled. Phyllida is slanting.", "logic": "\nSlanting(brandice)\nBlind(brandice)\nCommanding(brandice)\nSmallish(brandice)\nSlanting(lynnell)\nBlind(lynnell)\nPalpitant(lynnell)\nSmallish(lynnell)\nAppareled(phyllida)\nSmallish(phyllida)\nCommanding(brandice) -> Palpitant(brandice)\nforall x (Slanting(x) and Commanding(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Errant(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) and Commanding(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Palpitant(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) -> Errant(x))\nBlind(brandice) and Errant(brandice) -> Appareled(brandice)\nBlind(phyllida) and Palpitant(phyllida) -> Appareled(phyllida)\n\nSlanting(phyllida)\n\nSlanting(phyllida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Laureen is vulpecular. Laureen is crescendo. Laureen is variant. Laureen is curt. Clare is vulpecular. Clare is crescendo. Clare is unequal. Clare is curt. Derek is designing. Derek is curt. If Laureen is variant then Laureen is unequal. If someone is vulpecular and variant then they are unequal. Red people are unequal. Big, variant people are crescendo. If someone is unequal then they are crescendo. If someone is vulpecular then they are demented. If Laureen is crescendo and Laureen is demented then Laureen is designing. If Derek is crescendo and Derek is unequal then Derek is designing. Clare is not designing.", "logic": "\nVulpecular(laureen)\nCrescendo(laureen)\nVariant(laureen)\nCurt(laureen)\nVulpecular(clare)\nCrescendo(clare)\nUnequal(clare)\nCurt(clare)\nDesigning(derek)\nCurt(derek)\nVariant(laureen) -> Unequal(laureen)\nforall x (Vulpecular(x) and Variant(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Demented(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Vulpecular(x) and Variant(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nforall x (Vulpecular(x) -> Demented(x))\nCrescendo(laureen) and Demented(laureen) -> Designing(laureen)\nCrescendo(derek) and Unequal(derek) -> Designing(derek)\n\nnot Designing(clare)\n\nnot Designing(clare) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Dulcie is bohemian. Dulcie is cavernous. Dulcie is tasteless. Dulcie is scheduled. Mariel is bohemian. Mariel is cavernous. Mariel is agitated. Mariel is scheduled. Tynan is insightful. Tynan is scheduled. If Dulcie is tasteless then Dulcie is agitated. If someone is bohemian and tasteless then they are agitated. Red people are agitated. Big, tasteless people are cavernous. If someone is agitated then they are cavernous. If someone is bohemian then they are jittery. If Dulcie is cavernous and Dulcie is jittery then Dulcie is insightful. If Tynan is cavernous and Tynan is agitated then Tynan is insightful. Mariel is tasteless.", "logic": "\nBohemian(dulcie)\nCavernous(dulcie)\nTasteless(dulcie)\nScheduled(dulcie)\nBohemian(mariel)\nCavernous(mariel)\nAgitated(mariel)\nScheduled(mariel)\nInsightful(tynan)\nScheduled(tynan)\nTasteless(dulcie) -> Agitated(dulcie)\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Tasteless(x) -> Agitated(x))\nforall x (Jittery(x) -> Agitated(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Tasteless(x) -> Cavernous(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) -> Cavernous(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) -> Jittery(x))\nCavernous(dulcie) and Jittery(dulcie) -> Insightful(dulcie)\nCavernous(tynan) and Agitated(tynan) -> Insightful(tynan)\n\nTasteless(mariel)\n\nTasteless(mariel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1411"} {"premises": "Ulric is adjusted. Marven is favourable. Marven is extradural. Smart, nursed things are xxxviii. All nursed things are documental. If Ulric is adjusted then Ulric is nursed. If Ulric is documental and Ulric is nursed then Ulric is adjusted. If Ulric is nursed and Ulric is tricky then Ulric is documental. If something is adjusted then it is tricky. If Marven is extradural and Marven is nursed then Marven is favourable. Rough things are tricky. Ulric is adjusted.", "logic": "\nAdjusted(ulric)\nFavourable(marven)\nExtradural(marven)\nforall x (Documental(x) and Nursed(x) -> Xxxviii(x))\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Documental(x))\nAdjusted(ulric) -> Nursed(ulric)\nDocumental(ulric) and Nursed(ulric) -> Adjusted(ulric)\nNursed(ulric) and Tricky(ulric) -> Documental(ulric)\nforall x (Adjusted(x) -> Tricky(x))\nExtradural(marven) and Nursed(marven) -> Favourable(marven)\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Tricky(x))\n\nAdjusted(ulric)\n\ntherefore Adjusted(ulric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Camel is disputable. Dorothee is strung. Dorothee is taupe. Smart, redeemed things are archival. All redeemed things are pebbly. If Camel is disputable then Camel is redeemed. If Camel is pebbly and Camel is redeemed then Camel is disputable. If Camel is redeemed and Camel is sleeved then Camel is pebbly. If something is disputable then it is sleeved. If Dorothee is taupe and Dorothee is redeemed then Dorothee is strung. Rough things are sleeved. Dorothee is not taupe.", "logic": "\nDisputable(camel)\nStrung(dorothee)\nTaupe(dorothee)\nforall x (Pebbly(x) and Redeemed(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Redeemed(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nDisputable(camel) -> Redeemed(camel)\nPebbly(camel) and Redeemed(camel) -> Disputable(camel)\nRedeemed(camel) and Sleeved(camel) -> Pebbly(camel)\nforall x (Disputable(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nTaupe(dorothee) and Redeemed(dorothee) -> Strung(dorothee)\nforall x (Redeemed(x) -> Sleeved(x))\n\nnot Taupe(dorothee)\n\ntherefore Taupe(dorothee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Mackenzie is devotional. Regan is isopteran. Regan is disturbing. Smart, assuasive things are middlemost. All assuasive things are convex. If Mackenzie is devotional then Mackenzie is assuasive. If Mackenzie is convex and Mackenzie is assuasive then Mackenzie is devotional. If Mackenzie is assuasive and Mackenzie is monaural then Mackenzie is convex. If something is devotional then it is monaural. If Regan is disturbing and Regan is assuasive then Regan is isopteran. Rough things are monaural. Mackenzie is assuasive.", "logic": "\nDevotional(mackenzie)\nIsopteran(regan)\nDisturbing(regan)\nforall x (Convex(x) and Assuasive(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) -> Convex(x))\nDevotional(mackenzie) -> Assuasive(mackenzie)\nConvex(mackenzie) and Assuasive(mackenzie) -> Devotional(mackenzie)\nAssuasive(mackenzie) and Monaural(mackenzie) -> Convex(mackenzie)\nforall x (Devotional(x) -> Monaural(x))\nDisturbing(regan) and Assuasive(regan) -> Isopteran(regan)\nforall x (Assuasive(x) -> Monaural(x))\n\nAssuasive(mackenzie)\n\nDevotional(mackenzie) and Devotional(mackenzie) -> Assuasive(mackenzie) -> therefore Assuasive(mackenzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Yetty is polysemous. Corabel is antiphonal. Corabel is apposable. Smart, debased things are antiphonal. All debased things are metaphoric. If Yetty is polysemous then Yetty is debased. If Yetty is metaphoric and Yetty is debased then Yetty is polysemous. If Yetty is debased and Yetty is groping then Yetty is metaphoric. If something is polysemous then it is groping. If Corabel is apposable and Corabel is debased then Corabel is antiphonal. Rough things are groping. Yetty is not debased.", "logic": "\nPolysemous(yetty)\nAntiphonal(corabel)\nApposable(corabel)\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) and Debased(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\nPolysemous(yetty) -> Debased(yetty)\nMetaphoric(yetty) and Debased(yetty) -> Polysemous(yetty)\nDebased(yetty) and Groping(yetty) -> Metaphoric(yetty)\nforall x (Polysemous(x) -> Groping(x))\nApposable(corabel) and Debased(corabel) -> Antiphonal(corabel)\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Groping(x))\n\nnot Debased(yetty)\n\nPolysemous(yetty) and Polysemous(yetty) -> Debased(yetty) -> therefore Debased(yetty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Pembroke is modernised. Nesta is eviscerate. Nesta is bilobed. Smart, cataphatic things are kinetic. All cataphatic things are floral. If Pembroke is modernised then Pembroke is cataphatic. If Pembroke is floral and Pembroke is cataphatic then Pembroke is modernised. If Pembroke is cataphatic and Pembroke is haemic then Pembroke is floral. If something is modernised then it is haemic. If Nesta is bilobed and Nesta is cataphatic then Nesta is eviscerate. Rough things are haemic. Pembroke is floral.", "logic": "\nModernised(pembroke)\nEviscerate(nesta)\nBilobed(nesta)\nforall x (Floral(x) and Cataphatic(x) -> Kinetic(x))\nforall x (Cataphatic(x) -> Floral(x))\nModernised(pembroke) -> Cataphatic(pembroke)\nFloral(pembroke) and Cataphatic(pembroke) -> Modernised(pembroke)\nCataphatic(pembroke) and Haemic(pembroke) -> Floral(pembroke)\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> Haemic(x))\nBilobed(nesta) and Cataphatic(nesta) -> Eviscerate(nesta)\nforall x (Cataphatic(x) -> Haemic(x))\n\nFloral(pembroke)\n\nModernised(pembroke) and Modernised(pembroke) -> Cataphatic(pembroke) -> therefore Cataphatic(pembroke) Cataphatic(pembroke) and forall x (Cataphatic(x) -> Floral(x)) -> therefore Floral(pembroke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Hillel is chief. Laurella is exonerated. Laurella is venturous. Smart, malcontent things are unfeasible. All malcontent things are buff. If Hillel is chief then Hillel is malcontent. If Hillel is buff and Hillel is malcontent then Hillel is chief. If Hillel is malcontent and Hillel is rhenish then Hillel is buff. If something is chief then it is rhenish. If Laurella is venturous and Laurella is malcontent then Laurella is exonerated. Rough things are rhenish. Hillel is not buff.", "logic": "\nChief(hillel)\nExonerated(laurella)\nVenturous(laurella)\nforall x (Buff(x) and Malcontent(x) -> Unfeasible(x))\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Buff(x))\nChief(hillel) -> Malcontent(hillel)\nBuff(hillel) and Malcontent(hillel) -> Chief(hillel)\nMalcontent(hillel) and Rhenish(hillel) -> Buff(hillel)\nforall x (Chief(x) -> Rhenish(x))\nVenturous(laurella) and Malcontent(laurella) -> Exonerated(laurella)\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Rhenish(x))\n\nnot Buff(hillel)\n\nChief(hillel) and Chief(hillel) -> Malcontent(hillel) -> therefore Malcontent(hillel) Malcontent(hillel) and forall x (Malcontent(x) -> Buff(x)) -> therefore Buff(hillel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Sybil is pure. Quentin is labeled. Quentin is hooved. Smart, sensory things are semiformal. All sensory things are unenclosed. If Sybil is pure then Sybil is sensory. If Sybil is unenclosed and Sybil is sensory then Sybil is pure. If Sybil is sensory and Sybil is achaean then Sybil is unenclosed. If something is pure then it is achaean. If Quentin is hooved and Quentin is sensory then Quentin is labeled. Rough things are achaean. Quentin is not semiformal.", "logic": "\nPure(sybil)\nLabeled(quentin)\nHooved(quentin)\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) and Sensory(x) -> Semiformal(x))\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Unenclosed(x))\nPure(sybil) -> Sensory(sybil)\nUnenclosed(sybil) and Sensory(sybil) -> Pure(sybil)\nSensory(sybil) and Achaean(sybil) -> Unenclosed(sybil)\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Achaean(x))\nHooved(quentin) and Sensory(quentin) -> Labeled(quentin)\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Achaean(x))\n\nnot Semiformal(quentin)\n\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) and Sensory(x) -> Semiformal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Tirrell is ammoniacal. Shelden is gossamer. Shelden is piggy. Smart, hatted things are sworn. All hatted things are blanketed. If Tirrell is ammoniacal then Tirrell is hatted. If Tirrell is blanketed and Tirrell is hatted then Tirrell is ammoniacal. If Tirrell is hatted and Tirrell is untoothed then Tirrell is blanketed. If something is ammoniacal then it is untoothed. If Shelden is piggy and Shelden is hatted then Shelden is gossamer. Rough things are untoothed. Shelden is untoothed.", "logic": "\nAmmoniacal(tirrell)\nGossamer(shelden)\nPiggy(shelden)\nforall x (Blanketed(x) and Hatted(x) -> Sworn(x))\nforall x (Hatted(x) -> Blanketed(x))\nAmmoniacal(tirrell) -> Hatted(tirrell)\nBlanketed(tirrell) and Hatted(tirrell) -> Ammoniacal(tirrell)\nHatted(tirrell) and Untoothed(tirrell) -> Blanketed(tirrell)\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) -> Untoothed(x))\nPiggy(shelden) and Hatted(shelden) -> Gossamer(shelden)\nforall x (Hatted(x) -> Untoothed(x))\n\nUntoothed(shelden)\n\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) -> Untoothed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Shelden is ceremonial. Ashton is rubicund. Ashton is gangrenous. Smart, nonnomadic things are argentous. All nonnomadic things are unlettered. If Shelden is ceremonial then Shelden is nonnomadic. If Shelden is unlettered and Shelden is nonnomadic then Shelden is ceremonial. If Shelden is nonnomadic and Shelden is calcareous then Shelden is unlettered. If something is ceremonial then it is calcareous. If Ashton is gangrenous and Ashton is nonnomadic then Ashton is rubicund. Rough things are calcareous. Ashton is not unlettered.", "logic": "\nCeremonial(shelden)\nRubicund(ashton)\nGangrenous(ashton)\nforall x (Unlettered(x) and Nonnomadic(x) -> Argentous(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Unlettered(x))\nCeremonial(shelden) -> Nonnomadic(shelden)\nUnlettered(shelden) and Nonnomadic(shelden) -> Ceremonial(shelden)\nNonnomadic(shelden) and Calcareous(shelden) -> Unlettered(shelden)\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Calcareous(x))\nGangrenous(ashton) and Nonnomadic(ashton) -> Rubicund(ashton)\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Calcareous(x))\n\nnot Unlettered(ashton)\n\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Unlettered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Malkah is arid. Bubba is apomictic. Bubba is dirt. Smart, soughing things are final. All soughing things are ecological. If Malkah is arid then Malkah is soughing. If Malkah is ecological and Malkah is soughing then Malkah is arid. If Malkah is soughing and Malkah is quadrate then Malkah is ecological. If something is arid then it is quadrate. If Bubba is dirt and Bubba is soughing then Bubba is apomictic. Rough things are quadrate. Bubba is arid.", "logic": "\nArid(malkah)\nApomictic(bubba)\nDirt(bubba)\nforall x (Ecological(x) and Soughing(x) -> Final(x))\nforall x (Soughing(x) -> Ecological(x))\nArid(malkah) -> Soughing(malkah)\nEcological(malkah) and Soughing(malkah) -> Arid(malkah)\nSoughing(malkah) and Quadrate(malkah) -> Ecological(malkah)\nforall x (Arid(x) -> Quadrate(x))\nDirt(bubba) and Soughing(bubba) -> Apomictic(bubba)\nforall x (Soughing(x) -> Quadrate(x))\n\nArid(bubba)\n\nArid(bubba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Orbadiah is becoming. Carline is insistent. Carline is shifty. Smart, nett things are mesodermal. All nett things are rimy. If Orbadiah is becoming then Orbadiah is nett. If Orbadiah is rimy and Orbadiah is nett then Orbadiah is becoming. If Orbadiah is nett and Orbadiah is arboriform then Orbadiah is rimy. If something is becoming then it is arboriform. If Carline is shifty and Carline is nett then Carline is insistent. Rough things are arboriform. Carline is not nett.", "logic": "\nBecoming(orbadiah)\nInsistent(carline)\nShifty(carline)\nforall x (Rimy(x) and Nett(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Nett(x) -> Rimy(x))\nBecoming(orbadiah) -> Nett(orbadiah)\nRimy(orbadiah) and Nett(orbadiah) -> Becoming(orbadiah)\nNett(orbadiah) and Arboriform(orbadiah) -> Rimy(orbadiah)\nforall x (Becoming(x) -> Arboriform(x))\nShifty(carline) and Nett(carline) -> Insistent(carline)\nforall x (Nett(x) -> Arboriform(x))\n\nnot Nett(carline)\n\nnot Nett(carline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "Luciano is suckled. Karel is hulking. Karel is brusque. Smart, unverified things are brief. All unverified things are diverting. If Luciano is suckled then Luciano is unverified. If Luciano is diverting and Luciano is unverified then Luciano is suckled. If Luciano is unverified and Luciano is donnian then Luciano is diverting. If something is suckled then it is donnian. If Karel is brusque and Karel is unverified then Karel is hulking. Rough things are donnian. Luciano is hulking.", "logic": "\nSuckled(luciano)\nHulking(karel)\nBrusque(karel)\nforall x (Diverting(x) and Unverified(x) -> Brief(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) -> Diverting(x))\nSuckled(luciano) -> Unverified(luciano)\nDiverting(luciano) and Unverified(luciano) -> Suckled(luciano)\nUnverified(luciano) and Donnian(luciano) -> Diverting(luciano)\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> Donnian(x))\nBrusque(karel) and Unverified(karel) -> Hulking(karel)\nforall x (Unverified(x) -> Donnian(x))\n\nHulking(luciano)\n\nHulking(luciano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2344"} {"premises": "The keriann underpin the ajai. The keriann does not visit the lilyan. The dotti bore the keriann. The dotti bore the lilyan. The dotti is not homey. The dotti does not like the keriann. The dotti furbish the keriann. The dotti does not visit the lilyan. The lilyan bore the keriann. The lilyan is transpolar. The lilyan underpin the keriann. The lilyan furbish the dotti. The lilyan furbish the ajai. The ajai is willing. The ajai is not fretful. The ajai furbish the lilyan. If something underpin the lilyan then it does not eat the lilyan. If something is transpolar then it underpin the keriann. If something is homey then it underpin the ajai. If the keriann is willing and the keriann furbish the dotti then the keriann does not like the dotti. If something bore the lilyan and it underpin the ajai then it bore the dotti. If something is fretful and it bore the ajai then the ajai furbish the keriann. If something furbish the lilyan then the lilyan bore the dotti. If the keriann does not visit the lilyan then the keriann bore the lilyan. The dotti does not like the keriann.", "logic": "\nUnderpin(keriann, ajai)\nnot Furbish(keriann, lilyan)\nBore(dotti, keriann)\nBore(dotti, lilyan)\nnot Homey(dotti)\nnot Underpin(dotti, keriann)\nFurbish(dotti, keriann)\nnot Furbish(dotti, lilyan)\nBore(lilyan, keriann)\nTranspolar(lilyan)\nUnderpin(lilyan, keriann)\nFurbish(lilyan, dotti)\nFurbish(lilyan, ajai)\nWilling(ajai)\nnot Fretful(ajai)\nFurbish(ajai, lilyan)\nforall x (Underpin(x, lilyan) -> not Bore(x, lilyan))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> Underpin(x, keriann))\nforall x (Homey(x) -> Underpin(x, ajai))\nWilling(keriann) and Furbish(keriann, dotti) -> not Underpin(keriann, dotti)\nforall x (Bore(x, lilyan) and Underpin(x, ajai) -> Bore(x, dotti))\nforall x (Fretful(x) and Bore(x, ajai) -> Furbish(ajai, keriann))\nforall x (Furbish(x, lilyan) -> Bore(lilyan, dotti))\nnot Furbish(keriann, lilyan) -> Bore(keriann, lilyan)\n\nnot Underpin(dotti, keriann)\n\ntherefore not Underpin(dotti, keriann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The teresina dethaw the sascha. The teresina does not visit the charmine. The shlomo abduct the teresina. The shlomo abduct the charmine. The shlomo is not dicky. The shlomo does not like the teresina. The shlomo seel the teresina. The shlomo does not visit the charmine. The charmine abduct the teresina. The charmine is veteran. The charmine dethaw the teresina. The charmine seel the shlomo. The charmine seel the sascha. The sascha is piggish. The sascha is not splotched. The sascha seel the charmine. If something dethaw the charmine then it does not eat the charmine. If something is veteran then it dethaw the teresina. If something is dicky then it dethaw the sascha. If the teresina is piggish and the teresina seel the shlomo then the teresina does not like the shlomo. If something abduct the charmine and it dethaw the sascha then it abduct the shlomo. If something is splotched and it abduct the sascha then the sascha seel the teresina. If something seel the charmine then the charmine abduct the shlomo. If the teresina does not visit the charmine then the teresina abduct the charmine. The shlomo does not eat the charmine.", "logic": "\nDethaw(teresina, sascha)\nnot Seel(teresina, charmine)\nAbduct(shlomo, teresina)\nAbduct(shlomo, charmine)\nnot Dicky(shlomo)\nnot Dethaw(shlomo, teresina)\nSeel(shlomo, teresina)\nnot Seel(shlomo, charmine)\nAbduct(charmine, teresina)\nVeteran(charmine)\nDethaw(charmine, teresina)\nSeel(charmine, shlomo)\nSeel(charmine, sascha)\nPiggish(sascha)\nnot Splotched(sascha)\nSeel(sascha, charmine)\nforall x (Dethaw(x, charmine) -> not Abduct(x, charmine))\nforall x (Veteran(x) -> Dethaw(x, teresina))\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Dethaw(x, sascha))\nPiggish(teresina) and Seel(teresina, shlomo) -> not Dethaw(teresina, shlomo)\nforall x (Abduct(x, charmine) and Dethaw(x, sascha) -> Abduct(x, shlomo))\nforall x (Splotched(x) and Abduct(x, sascha) -> Seel(sascha, teresina))\nforall x (Seel(x, charmine) -> Abduct(charmine, shlomo))\nnot Seel(teresina, charmine) -> Abduct(teresina, charmine)\n\nnot Abduct(shlomo, charmine)\n\ntherefore Abduct(shlomo, charmine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The nissy uglify the lisette. The nissy does not visit the jamey. The leontyne imprecate the nissy. The leontyne imprecate the jamey. The leontyne is not clamorous. The leontyne does not like the nissy. The leontyne prehend the nissy. The leontyne does not visit the jamey. The jamey imprecate the nissy. The jamey is rotatable. The jamey uglify the nissy. The jamey prehend the leontyne. The jamey prehend the lisette. The lisette is egocentric. The lisette is not untrusty. The lisette prehend the jamey. If something uglify the jamey then it does not eat the jamey. If something is rotatable then it uglify the nissy. If something is clamorous then it uglify the lisette. If the nissy is egocentric and the nissy prehend the leontyne then the nissy does not like the leontyne. If something imprecate the jamey and it uglify the lisette then it imprecate the leontyne. If something is untrusty and it imprecate the lisette then the lisette prehend the nissy. If something prehend the jamey then the jamey imprecate the leontyne. If the nissy does not visit the jamey then the nissy imprecate the jamey. The nissy imprecate the jamey.", "logic": "\nUglify(nissy, lisette)\nnot Prehend(nissy, jamey)\nImprecate(leontyne, nissy)\nImprecate(leontyne, jamey)\nnot Clamorous(leontyne)\nnot Uglify(leontyne, nissy)\nPrehend(leontyne, nissy)\nnot Prehend(leontyne, jamey)\nImprecate(jamey, nissy)\nRotatable(jamey)\nUglify(jamey, nissy)\nPrehend(jamey, leontyne)\nPrehend(jamey, lisette)\nEgocentric(lisette)\nnot Untrusty(lisette)\nPrehend(lisette, jamey)\nforall x (Uglify(x, jamey) -> not Imprecate(x, jamey))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) -> Uglify(x, nissy))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) -> Uglify(x, lisette))\nEgocentric(nissy) and Prehend(nissy, leontyne) -> not Uglify(nissy, leontyne)\nforall x (Imprecate(x, jamey) and Uglify(x, lisette) -> Imprecate(x, leontyne))\nforall x (Untrusty(x) and Imprecate(x, lisette) -> Prehend(lisette, nissy))\nforall x (Prehend(x, jamey) -> Imprecate(jamey, leontyne))\nnot Prehend(nissy, jamey) -> Imprecate(nissy, jamey)\n\nImprecate(nissy, jamey)\n\nnot Prehend(nissy, jamey) and not Prehend(nissy, jamey) -> Imprecate(nissy, jamey) -> therefore Imprecate(nissy, jamey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The vivie conceal the rebeca. The vivie does not visit the lorianne. The gerhard trek the vivie. The gerhard trek the lorianne. The gerhard is not anorthitic. The gerhard does not like the vivie. The gerhard sensualise the vivie. The gerhard does not visit the lorianne. The lorianne trek the vivie. The lorianne is knavish. The lorianne conceal the vivie. The lorianne sensualise the gerhard. The lorianne sensualise the rebeca. The rebeca is rhombic. The rebeca is not continuant. The rebeca sensualise the lorianne. If something conceal the lorianne then it does not eat the lorianne. If something is knavish then it conceal the vivie. If something is anorthitic then it conceal the rebeca. If the vivie is rhombic and the vivie sensualise the gerhard then the vivie does not like the gerhard. If something trek the lorianne and it conceal the rebeca then it trek the gerhard. If something is continuant and it trek the rebeca then the rebeca sensualise the vivie. If something sensualise the lorianne then the lorianne trek the gerhard. If the vivie does not visit the lorianne then the vivie trek the lorianne. The lorianne does not eat the gerhard.", "logic": "\nConceal(vivie, rebeca)\nnot Sensualise(vivie, lorianne)\nTrek(gerhard, vivie)\nTrek(gerhard, lorianne)\nnot Anorthitic(gerhard)\nnot Conceal(gerhard, vivie)\nSensualise(gerhard, vivie)\nnot Sensualise(gerhard, lorianne)\nTrek(lorianne, vivie)\nKnavish(lorianne)\nConceal(lorianne, vivie)\nSensualise(lorianne, gerhard)\nSensualise(lorianne, rebeca)\nRhombic(rebeca)\nnot Continuant(rebeca)\nSensualise(rebeca, lorianne)\nforall x (Conceal(x, lorianne) -> not Trek(x, lorianne))\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> Conceal(x, vivie))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) -> Conceal(x, rebeca))\nRhombic(vivie) and Sensualise(vivie, gerhard) -> not Conceal(vivie, gerhard)\nforall x (Trek(x, lorianne) and Conceal(x, rebeca) -> Trek(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Continuant(x) and Trek(x, rebeca) -> Sensualise(rebeca, vivie))\nforall x (Sensualise(x, lorianne) -> Trek(lorianne, gerhard))\nnot Sensualise(vivie, lorianne) -> Trek(vivie, lorianne)\n\nnot Trek(lorianne, gerhard)\n\nSensualise(rebeca, lorianne) and forall x (Sensualise(x, lorianne) -> Trek(lorianne, gerhard)) -> therefore Trek(lorianne, gerhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The ada palisade the carlina. The ada does not visit the velvet. The cherish bewilder the ada. The cherish bewilder the velvet. The cherish is not comfy. The cherish does not like the ada. The cherish defeat the ada. The cherish does not visit the velvet. The velvet bewilder the ada. The velvet is unfamiliar. The velvet palisade the ada. The velvet defeat the cherish. The velvet defeat the carlina. The carlina is stressed. The carlina is not planted. The carlina defeat the velvet. If something palisade the velvet then it does not eat the velvet. If something is unfamiliar then it palisade the ada. If something is comfy then it palisade the carlina. If the ada is stressed and the ada defeat the cherish then the ada does not like the cherish. If something bewilder the velvet and it palisade the carlina then it bewilder the cherish. If something is planted and it bewilder the carlina then the carlina defeat the ada. If something defeat the velvet then the velvet bewilder the cherish. If the ada does not visit the velvet then the ada bewilder the velvet. The ada bewilder the cherish.", "logic": "\nPalisade(ada, carlina)\nnot Defeat(ada, velvet)\nBewilder(cherish, ada)\nBewilder(cherish, velvet)\nnot Comfy(cherish)\nnot Palisade(cherish, ada)\nDefeat(cherish, ada)\nnot Defeat(cherish, velvet)\nBewilder(velvet, ada)\nUnfamiliar(velvet)\nPalisade(velvet, ada)\nDefeat(velvet, cherish)\nDefeat(velvet, carlina)\nStressed(carlina)\nnot Planted(carlina)\nDefeat(carlina, velvet)\nforall x (Palisade(x, velvet) -> not Bewilder(x, velvet))\nforall x (Unfamiliar(x) -> Palisade(x, ada))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Palisade(x, carlina))\nStressed(ada) and Defeat(ada, cherish) -> not Palisade(ada, cherish)\nforall x (Bewilder(x, velvet) and Palisade(x, carlina) -> Bewilder(x, cherish))\nforall x (Planted(x) and Bewilder(x, carlina) -> Defeat(carlina, ada))\nforall x (Defeat(x, velvet) -> Bewilder(velvet, cherish))\nnot Defeat(ada, velvet) -> Bewilder(ada, velvet)\n\nBewilder(ada, cherish)\n\nnot Defeat(ada, velvet) and not Defeat(ada, velvet) -> Bewilder(ada, velvet) -> therefore Bewilder(ada, velvet) Bewilder(ada, velvet) and Palisade(ada, carlina) and forall x (Bewilder(x, velvet) and Palisade(x, carlina) -> Bewilder(x, cherish)) -> therefore Bewilder(ada, cherish)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The berna compost the malorie. The berna does not visit the casper. The fatima eulogize the berna. The fatima eulogize the casper. The fatima is not florentine. The fatima does not like the berna. The fatima relyric the berna. The fatima does not visit the casper. The casper eulogize the berna. The casper is endogenic. The casper compost the berna. The casper relyric the fatima. The casper relyric the malorie. The malorie is christly. The malorie is not inventive. The malorie relyric the casper. If something compost the casper then it does not eat the casper. If something is endogenic then it compost the berna. If something is florentine then it compost the malorie. If the berna is christly and the berna relyric the fatima then the berna does not like the fatima. If something eulogize the casper and it compost the malorie then it eulogize the fatima. If something is inventive and it eulogize the malorie then the malorie relyric the berna. If something relyric the casper then the casper eulogize the fatima. If the berna does not visit the casper then the berna eulogize the casper. The berna does not eat the fatima.", "logic": "\nCompost(berna, malorie)\nnot Relyric(berna, casper)\nEulogize(fatima, berna)\nEulogize(fatima, casper)\nnot Florentine(fatima)\nnot Compost(fatima, berna)\nRelyric(fatima, berna)\nnot Relyric(fatima, casper)\nEulogize(casper, berna)\nEndogenic(casper)\nCompost(casper, berna)\nRelyric(casper, fatima)\nRelyric(casper, malorie)\nChristly(malorie)\nnot Inventive(malorie)\nRelyric(malorie, casper)\nforall x (Compost(x, casper) -> not Eulogize(x, casper))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) -> Compost(x, berna))\nforall x (Florentine(x) -> Compost(x, malorie))\nChristly(berna) and Relyric(berna, fatima) -> not Compost(berna, fatima)\nforall x (Eulogize(x, casper) and Compost(x, malorie) -> Eulogize(x, fatima))\nforall x (Inventive(x) and Eulogize(x, malorie) -> Relyric(malorie, berna))\nforall x (Relyric(x, casper) -> Eulogize(casper, fatima))\nnot Relyric(berna, casper) -> Eulogize(berna, casper)\n\nnot Eulogize(berna, fatima)\n\nnot Relyric(berna, casper) and not Relyric(berna, casper) -> Eulogize(berna, casper) -> therefore Eulogize(berna, casper) Eulogize(berna, casper) and Compost(berna, malorie) and forall x (Eulogize(x, casper) and Compost(x, malorie) -> Eulogize(x, fatima)) -> therefore Eulogize(berna, fatima)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The dudley report the jazmin. The dudley does not visit the husein. The carmine batik the dudley. The carmine batik the husein. The carmine is not vociferous. The carmine does not like the dudley. The carmine brainstorm the dudley. The carmine does not visit the husein. The husein batik the dudley. The husein is cyclical. The husein report the dudley. The husein brainstorm the carmine. The husein brainstorm the jazmin. The jazmin is nucleate. The jazmin is not insurable. The jazmin brainstorm the husein. If something report the husein then it does not eat the husein. If something is cyclical then it report the dudley. If something is vociferous then it report the jazmin. If the dudley is nucleate and the dudley brainstorm the carmine then the dudley does not like the carmine. If something batik the husein and it report the jazmin then it batik the carmine. If something is insurable and it batik the jazmin then the jazmin brainstorm the dudley. If something brainstorm the husein then the husein batik the carmine. If the dudley does not visit the husein then the dudley batik the husein. The husein does not like the jazmin.", "logic": "\nReport(dudley, jazmin)\nnot Brainstorm(dudley, husein)\nBatik(carmine, dudley)\nBatik(carmine, husein)\nnot Vociferous(carmine)\nnot Report(carmine, dudley)\nBrainstorm(carmine, dudley)\nnot Brainstorm(carmine, husein)\nBatik(husein, dudley)\nCyclical(husein)\nReport(husein, dudley)\nBrainstorm(husein, carmine)\nBrainstorm(husein, jazmin)\nNucleate(jazmin)\nnot Insurable(jazmin)\nBrainstorm(jazmin, husein)\nforall x (Report(x, husein) -> not Batik(x, husein))\nforall x (Cyclical(x) -> Report(x, dudley))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Report(x, jazmin))\nNucleate(dudley) and Brainstorm(dudley, carmine) -> not Report(dudley, carmine)\nforall x (Batik(x, husein) and Report(x, jazmin) -> Batik(x, carmine))\nforall x (Insurable(x) and Batik(x, jazmin) -> Brainstorm(jazmin, dudley))\nforall x (Brainstorm(x, husein) -> Batik(husein, carmine))\nnot Brainstorm(dudley, husein) -> Batik(dudley, husein)\n\nnot Report(husein, jazmin)\n\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Report(x, jazmin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The jeni preserve the emery. The jeni does not visit the kelsy. The jaleh slash the jeni. The jaleh slash the kelsy. The jaleh is not molded. The jaleh does not like the jeni. The jaleh telegraph the jeni. The jaleh does not visit the kelsy. The kelsy slash the jeni. The kelsy is procurable. The kelsy preserve the jeni. The kelsy telegraph the jaleh. The kelsy telegraph the emery. The emery is fateful. The emery is not plucky. The emery telegraph the kelsy. If something preserve the kelsy then it does not eat the kelsy. If something is procurable then it preserve the jeni. If something is molded then it preserve the emery. If the jeni is fateful and the jeni telegraph the jaleh then the jeni does not like the jaleh. If something slash the kelsy and it preserve the emery then it slash the jaleh. If something is plucky and it slash the emery then the emery telegraph the jeni. If something telegraph the kelsy then the kelsy slash the jaleh. If the jeni does not visit the kelsy then the jeni slash the kelsy. The emery slash the jaleh.", "logic": "\nPreserve(jeni, emery)\nnot Telegraph(jeni, kelsy)\nSlash(jaleh, jeni)\nSlash(jaleh, kelsy)\nnot Molded(jaleh)\nnot Preserve(jaleh, jeni)\nTelegraph(jaleh, jeni)\nnot Telegraph(jaleh, kelsy)\nSlash(kelsy, jeni)\nProcurable(kelsy)\nPreserve(kelsy, jeni)\nTelegraph(kelsy, jaleh)\nTelegraph(kelsy, emery)\nFateful(emery)\nnot Plucky(emery)\nTelegraph(emery, kelsy)\nforall x (Preserve(x, kelsy) -> not Slash(x, kelsy))\nforall x (Procurable(x) -> Preserve(x, jeni))\nforall x (Molded(x) -> Preserve(x, emery))\nFateful(jeni) and Telegraph(jeni, jaleh) -> not Preserve(jeni, jaleh)\nforall x (Slash(x, kelsy) and Preserve(x, emery) -> Slash(x, jaleh))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and Slash(x, emery) -> Telegraph(emery, jeni))\nforall x (Telegraph(x, kelsy) -> Slash(kelsy, jaleh))\nnot Telegraph(jeni, kelsy) -> Slash(jeni, kelsy)\n\nSlash(emery, jaleh)\n\nforall x (Slash(x, kelsy) and Preserve(x, emery) -> Slash(x, jaleh)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The silas dissever the kellie. The silas does not visit the jocelyn. The guillaume blockade the silas. The guillaume blockade the jocelyn. The guillaume is not unlucky. The guillaume does not like the silas. The guillaume minimise the silas. The guillaume does not visit the jocelyn. The jocelyn blockade the silas. The jocelyn is cuspidal. The jocelyn dissever the silas. The jocelyn minimise the guillaume. The jocelyn minimise the kellie. The kellie is drooping. The kellie is not wounding. The kellie minimise the jocelyn. If something dissever the jocelyn then it does not eat the jocelyn. If something is cuspidal then it dissever the silas. If something is unlucky then it dissever the kellie. If the silas is drooping and the silas minimise the guillaume then the silas does not like the guillaume. If something blockade the jocelyn and it dissever the kellie then it blockade the guillaume. If something is wounding and it blockade the kellie then the kellie minimise the silas. If something minimise the jocelyn then the jocelyn blockade the guillaume. If the silas does not visit the jocelyn then the silas blockade the jocelyn. The guillaume does not like the kellie.", "logic": "\nDissever(silas, kellie)\nnot Minimise(silas, jocelyn)\nBlockade(guillaume, silas)\nBlockade(guillaume, jocelyn)\nnot Unlucky(guillaume)\nnot Dissever(guillaume, silas)\nMinimise(guillaume, silas)\nnot Minimise(guillaume, jocelyn)\nBlockade(jocelyn, silas)\nCuspidal(jocelyn)\nDissever(jocelyn, silas)\nMinimise(jocelyn, guillaume)\nMinimise(jocelyn, kellie)\nDrooping(kellie)\nnot Wounding(kellie)\nMinimise(kellie, jocelyn)\nforall x (Dissever(x, jocelyn) -> not Blockade(x, jocelyn))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) -> Dissever(x, silas))\nforall x (Unlucky(x) -> Dissever(x, kellie))\nDrooping(silas) and Minimise(silas, guillaume) -> not Dissever(silas, guillaume)\nforall x (Blockade(x, jocelyn) and Dissever(x, kellie) -> Blockade(x, guillaume))\nforall x (Wounding(x) and Blockade(x, kellie) -> Minimise(kellie, silas))\nforall x (Minimise(x, jocelyn) -> Blockade(jocelyn, guillaume))\nnot Minimise(silas, jocelyn) -> Blockade(silas, jocelyn)\n\nnot Dissever(guillaume, kellie)\n\nforall x (Unlucky(x) -> Dissever(x, kellie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The ethelred extol the dulcy. The ethelred does not visit the paddie. The kania pomade the ethelred. The kania pomade the paddie. The kania is not resonant. The kania does not like the ethelred. The kania unfrock the ethelred. The kania does not visit the paddie. The paddie pomade the ethelred. The paddie is impotent. The paddie extol the ethelred. The paddie unfrock the kania. The paddie unfrock the dulcy. The dulcy is deceased. The dulcy is not remedial. The dulcy unfrock the paddie. If something extol the paddie then it does not eat the paddie. If something is impotent then it extol the ethelred. If something is resonant then it extol the dulcy. If the ethelred is deceased and the ethelred unfrock the kania then the ethelred does not like the kania. If something pomade the paddie and it extol the dulcy then it pomade the kania. If something is remedial and it pomade the dulcy then the dulcy unfrock the ethelred. If something unfrock the paddie then the paddie pomade the kania. If the ethelred does not visit the paddie then the ethelred pomade the paddie. The dulcy unfrock the dulcy.", "logic": "\nExtol(ethelred, dulcy)\nnot Unfrock(ethelred, paddie)\nPomade(kania, ethelred)\nPomade(kania, paddie)\nnot Resonant(kania)\nnot Extol(kania, ethelred)\nUnfrock(kania, ethelred)\nnot Unfrock(kania, paddie)\nPomade(paddie, ethelred)\nImpotent(paddie)\nExtol(paddie, ethelred)\nUnfrock(paddie, kania)\nUnfrock(paddie, dulcy)\nDeceased(dulcy)\nnot Remedial(dulcy)\nUnfrock(dulcy, paddie)\nforall x (Extol(x, paddie) -> not Pomade(x, paddie))\nforall x (Impotent(x) -> Extol(x, ethelred))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Extol(x, dulcy))\nDeceased(ethelred) and Unfrock(ethelred, kania) -> not Extol(ethelred, kania)\nforall x (Pomade(x, paddie) and Extol(x, dulcy) -> Pomade(x, kania))\nforall x (Remedial(x) and Pomade(x, dulcy) -> Unfrock(dulcy, ethelred))\nforall x (Unfrock(x, paddie) -> Pomade(paddie, kania))\nnot Unfrock(ethelred, paddie) -> Pomade(ethelred, paddie)\n\nUnfrock(dulcy, dulcy)\n\nUnfrock(dulcy, dulcy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The lezlie chevy the mic. The lezlie does not visit the britta. The rocky deodorise the lezlie. The rocky deodorise the britta. The rocky is not mysophobic. The rocky does not like the lezlie. The rocky coinsure the lezlie. The rocky does not visit the britta. The britta deodorise the lezlie. The britta is soporific. The britta chevy the lezlie. The britta coinsure the rocky. The britta coinsure the mic. The mic is dwarfish. The mic is not undershot. The mic coinsure the britta. If something chevy the britta then it does not eat the britta. If something is soporific then it chevy the lezlie. If something is mysophobic then it chevy the mic. If the lezlie is dwarfish and the lezlie coinsure the rocky then the lezlie does not like the rocky. If something deodorise the britta and it chevy the mic then it deodorise the rocky. If something is undershot and it deodorise the mic then the mic coinsure the lezlie. If something coinsure the britta then the britta deodorise the rocky. If the lezlie does not visit the britta then the lezlie deodorise the britta. The rocky does not like the britta.", "logic": "\nChevy(lezlie, mic)\nnot Coinsure(lezlie, britta)\nDeodorise(rocky, lezlie)\nDeodorise(rocky, britta)\nnot Mysophobic(rocky)\nnot Chevy(rocky, lezlie)\nCoinsure(rocky, lezlie)\nnot Coinsure(rocky, britta)\nDeodorise(britta, lezlie)\nSoporific(britta)\nChevy(britta, lezlie)\nCoinsure(britta, rocky)\nCoinsure(britta, mic)\nDwarfish(mic)\nnot Undershot(mic)\nCoinsure(mic, britta)\nforall x (Chevy(x, britta) -> not Deodorise(x, britta))\nforall x (Soporific(x) -> Chevy(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Mysophobic(x) -> Chevy(x, mic))\nDwarfish(lezlie) and Coinsure(lezlie, rocky) -> not Chevy(lezlie, rocky)\nforall x (Deodorise(x, britta) and Chevy(x, mic) -> Deodorise(x, rocky))\nforall x (Undershot(x) and Deodorise(x, mic) -> Coinsure(mic, lezlie))\nforall x (Coinsure(x, britta) -> Deodorise(britta, rocky))\nnot Coinsure(lezlie, britta) -> Deodorise(lezlie, britta)\n\nnot Chevy(rocky, britta)\n\nnot Chevy(rocky, britta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The sterling aquaplane the rita. The sterling does not visit the dosi. The trenna disappear the sterling. The trenna disappear the dosi. The trenna is not acapnic. The trenna does not like the sterling. The trenna gaze the sterling. The trenna does not visit the dosi. The dosi disappear the sterling. The dosi is unshod. The dosi aquaplane the sterling. The dosi gaze the trenna. The dosi gaze the rita. The rita is flyaway. The rita is not thorny. The rita gaze the dosi. If something aquaplane the dosi then it does not eat the dosi. If something is unshod then it aquaplane the sterling. If something is acapnic then it aquaplane the rita. If the sterling is flyaway and the sterling gaze the trenna then the sterling does not like the trenna. If something disappear the dosi and it aquaplane the rita then it disappear the trenna. If something is thorny and it disappear the rita then the rita gaze the sterling. If something gaze the dosi then the dosi disappear the trenna. If the sterling does not visit the dosi then the sterling disappear the dosi. The sterling gaze the trenna.", "logic": "\nAquaplane(sterling, rita)\nnot Gaze(sterling, dosi)\nDisappear(trenna, sterling)\nDisappear(trenna, dosi)\nnot Acapnic(trenna)\nnot Aquaplane(trenna, sterling)\nGaze(trenna, sterling)\nnot Gaze(trenna, dosi)\nDisappear(dosi, sterling)\nUnshod(dosi)\nAquaplane(dosi, sterling)\nGaze(dosi, trenna)\nGaze(dosi, rita)\nFlyaway(rita)\nnot Thorny(rita)\nGaze(rita, dosi)\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, dosi) -> not Disappear(x, dosi))\nforall x (Unshod(x) -> Aquaplane(x, sterling))\nforall x (Acapnic(x) -> Aquaplane(x, rita))\nFlyaway(sterling) and Gaze(sterling, trenna) -> not Aquaplane(sterling, trenna)\nforall x (Disappear(x, dosi) and Aquaplane(x, rita) -> Disappear(x, trenna))\nforall x (Thorny(x) and Disappear(x, rita) -> Gaze(rita, sterling))\nforall x (Gaze(x, dosi) -> Disappear(dosi, trenna))\nnot Gaze(sterling, dosi) -> Disappear(sterling, dosi)\n\nGaze(sterling, trenna)\n\nGaze(sterling, trenna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-372"} {"premises": "The felicia wake the staffard. The felicia is euphonious. The felicia is bugged. The staffard wake the felicia. The staffard is euphonious. The staffard is bugged. The staffard is yummy. The staffard is not graspable. The staffard does not like the felicia. The staffard unthaw the felicia. If something wake the felicia then it massacre the staffard. If something wake the felicia and it wake the staffard then the felicia is not graspable. If something massacre the felicia and it does not chase the staffard then the staffard wake the felicia. If something wake the staffard then it wake the felicia. If something is graspable then it does not see the staffard. If something wake the staffard and it does not like the staffard then the staffard unthaw the felicia. The staffard unthaw the felicia.", "logic": "\nWake(felicia, staffard)\nEuphonious(felicia)\nBugged(felicia)\nWake(staffard, felicia)\nEuphonious(staffard)\nBugged(staffard)\nYummy(staffard)\nnot Graspable(staffard)\nnot Massacre(staffard, felicia)\nUnthaw(staffard, felicia)\nforall x (Wake(x, felicia) -> Massacre(x, staffard))\nforall x (Wake(x, felicia) and Wake(x, staffard) -> not Graspable(felicia))\nforall x (Massacre(x, felicia) and not Wake(x, staffard) -> Wake(staffard, felicia))\nforall x (Wake(x, staffard) -> Wake(x, felicia))\nforall x (Graspable(x) -> not Unthaw(x, staffard))\nforall x (Wake(x, staffard) and not Massacre(x, staffard) -> Unthaw(staffard, felicia))\n\nUnthaw(staffard, felicia)\n\ntherefore Unthaw(staffard, felicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The galina realise the dorelia. The galina is allophonic. The galina is anaemic. The dorelia realise the galina. The dorelia is allophonic. The dorelia is anaemic. The dorelia is alright. The dorelia is not authorial. The dorelia does not like the galina. The dorelia resent the galina. If something realise the galina then it email the dorelia. If something realise the galina and it realise the dorelia then the galina is not authorial. If something email the galina and it does not chase the dorelia then the dorelia realise the galina. If something realise the dorelia then it realise the galina. If something is authorial then it does not see the dorelia. If something realise the dorelia and it does not like the dorelia then the dorelia resent the galina. The dorelia is not alright.", "logic": "\nRealise(galina, dorelia)\nAllophonic(galina)\nAnaemic(galina)\nRealise(dorelia, galina)\nAllophonic(dorelia)\nAnaemic(dorelia)\nAlright(dorelia)\nnot Authorial(dorelia)\nnot Email(dorelia, galina)\nResent(dorelia, galina)\nforall x (Realise(x, galina) -> Email(x, dorelia))\nforall x (Realise(x, galina) and Realise(x, dorelia) -> not Authorial(galina))\nforall x (Email(x, galina) and not Realise(x, dorelia) -> Realise(dorelia, galina))\nforall x (Realise(x, dorelia) -> Realise(x, galina))\nforall x (Authorial(x) -> not Resent(x, dorelia))\nforall x (Realise(x, dorelia) and not Email(x, dorelia) -> Resent(dorelia, galina))\n\nnot Alright(dorelia)\n\ntherefore Alright(dorelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The bell judge the stace. The bell is syncretic. The bell is earthlike. The stace judge the bell. The stace is syncretic. The stace is earthlike. The stace is dazed. The stace is not routine. The stace does not like the bell. The stace colly the bell. If something judge the bell then it unbind the stace. If something judge the bell and it judge the stace then the bell is not routine. If something unbind the bell and it does not chase the stace then the stace judge the bell. If something judge the stace then it judge the bell. If something is routine then it does not see the stace. If something judge the stace and it does not like the stace then the stace colly the bell. The stace unbind the stace.", "logic": "\nJudge(bell, stace)\nSyncretic(bell)\nEarthlike(bell)\nJudge(stace, bell)\nSyncretic(stace)\nEarthlike(stace)\nDazed(stace)\nnot Routine(stace)\nnot Unbind(stace, bell)\nColly(stace, bell)\nforall x (Judge(x, bell) -> Unbind(x, stace))\nforall x (Judge(x, bell) and Judge(x, stace) -> not Routine(bell))\nforall x (Unbind(x, bell) and not Judge(x, stace) -> Judge(stace, bell))\nforall x (Judge(x, stace) -> Judge(x, bell))\nforall x (Routine(x) -> not Colly(x, stace))\nforall x (Judge(x, stace) and not Unbind(x, stace) -> Colly(stace, bell))\n\nUnbind(stace, stace)\n\nJudge(stace, bell) and forall x (Judge(x, bell) -> Unbind(x, stace)) -> therefore Unbind(stace, stace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The henderson frisk the rosalynd. The henderson is decayed. The henderson is committed. The rosalynd frisk the henderson. The rosalynd is decayed. The rosalynd is committed. The rosalynd is enervated. The rosalynd is not stroppy. The rosalynd does not like the henderson. The rosalynd appear the henderson. If something frisk the henderson then it right the rosalynd. If something frisk the henderson and it frisk the rosalynd then the henderson is not stroppy. If something right the henderson and it does not chase the rosalynd then the rosalynd frisk the henderson. If something frisk the rosalynd then it frisk the henderson. If something is stroppy then it does not see the rosalynd. If something frisk the rosalynd and it does not like the rosalynd then the rosalynd appear the henderson. The rosalynd does not like the rosalynd.", "logic": "\nFrisk(henderson, rosalynd)\nDecayed(henderson)\nCommitted(henderson)\nFrisk(rosalynd, henderson)\nDecayed(rosalynd)\nCommitted(rosalynd)\nEnervated(rosalynd)\nnot Stroppy(rosalynd)\nnot Right(rosalynd, henderson)\nAppear(rosalynd, henderson)\nforall x (Frisk(x, henderson) -> Right(x, rosalynd))\nforall x (Frisk(x, henderson) and Frisk(x, rosalynd) -> not Stroppy(henderson))\nforall x (Right(x, henderson) and not Frisk(x, rosalynd) -> Frisk(rosalynd, henderson))\nforall x (Frisk(x, rosalynd) -> Frisk(x, henderson))\nforall x (Stroppy(x) -> not Appear(x, rosalynd))\nforall x (Frisk(x, rosalynd) and not Right(x, rosalynd) -> Appear(rosalynd, henderson))\n\nnot Right(rosalynd, rosalynd)\n\nFrisk(rosalynd, henderson) and forall x (Frisk(x, henderson) -> Right(x, rosalynd)) -> therefore Right(rosalynd, rosalynd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The brendan aspire the isaac. The brendan is equipped. The brendan is empowered. The isaac aspire the brendan. The isaac is equipped. The isaac is empowered. The isaac is aortic. The isaac is not mayoral. The isaac does not like the brendan. The isaac pompadour the brendan. If something aspire the brendan then it regress the isaac. If something aspire the brendan and it aspire the isaac then the brendan is not mayoral. If something regress the brendan and it does not chase the isaac then the isaac aspire the brendan. If something aspire the isaac then it aspire the brendan. If something is mayoral then it does not see the isaac. If something aspire the isaac and it does not like the isaac then the isaac pompadour the brendan. The brendan is not mayoral.", "logic": "\nAspire(brendan, isaac)\nEquipped(brendan)\nEmpowered(brendan)\nAspire(isaac, brendan)\nEquipped(isaac)\nEmpowered(isaac)\nAortic(isaac)\nnot Mayoral(isaac)\nnot Regress(isaac, brendan)\nPompadour(isaac, brendan)\nforall x (Aspire(x, brendan) -> Regress(x, isaac))\nforall x (Aspire(x, brendan) and Aspire(x, isaac) -> not Mayoral(brendan))\nforall x (Regress(x, brendan) and not Aspire(x, isaac) -> Aspire(isaac, brendan))\nforall x (Aspire(x, isaac) -> Aspire(x, brendan))\nforall x (Mayoral(x) -> not Pompadour(x, isaac))\nforall x (Aspire(x, isaac) and not Regress(x, isaac) -> Pompadour(isaac, brendan))\n\nnot Mayoral(brendan)\n\nAspire(brendan, isaac) and forall x (Aspire(x, isaac) -> Aspire(x, brendan)) -> therefore Aspire(brendan, brendan) Aspire(brendan, brendan) and Aspire(brendan, isaac) and forall x (Aspire(x, brendan) and Aspire(x, isaac) -> not Mayoral(brendan)) -> therefore not Mayoral(brendan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The spiro shuck the cornelle. The spiro is leechlike. The spiro is downhill. The cornelle shuck the spiro. The cornelle is leechlike. The cornelle is downhill. The cornelle is prototypic. The cornelle is not weatherly. The cornelle does not like the spiro. The cornelle divorce the spiro. If something shuck the spiro then it crackle the cornelle. If something shuck the spiro and it shuck the cornelle then the spiro is not weatherly. If something crackle the spiro and it does not chase the cornelle then the cornelle shuck the spiro. If something shuck the cornelle then it shuck the spiro. If something is weatherly then it does not see the cornelle. If something shuck the cornelle and it does not like the cornelle then the cornelle divorce the spiro. The spiro does not like the cornelle.", "logic": "\nShuck(spiro, cornelle)\nLeechlike(spiro)\nDownhill(spiro)\nShuck(cornelle, spiro)\nLeechlike(cornelle)\nDownhill(cornelle)\nPrototypic(cornelle)\nnot Weatherly(cornelle)\nnot Crackle(cornelle, spiro)\nDivorce(cornelle, spiro)\nforall x (Shuck(x, spiro) -> Crackle(x, cornelle))\nforall x (Shuck(x, spiro) and Shuck(x, cornelle) -> not Weatherly(spiro))\nforall x (Crackle(x, spiro) and not Shuck(x, cornelle) -> Shuck(cornelle, spiro))\nforall x (Shuck(x, cornelle) -> Shuck(x, spiro))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) -> not Divorce(x, cornelle))\nforall x (Shuck(x, cornelle) and not Crackle(x, cornelle) -> Divorce(cornelle, spiro))\n\nnot Crackle(spiro, cornelle)\n\nShuck(spiro, cornelle) and forall x (Shuck(x, cornelle) -> Shuck(x, spiro)) -> therefore Shuck(spiro, spiro) Shuck(spiro, spiro) and forall x (Shuck(x, spiro) -> Crackle(x, cornelle)) -> therefore Crackle(spiro, cornelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The barn uncurl the adelle. The barn is extreme. The barn is blooming. The adelle uncurl the barn. The adelle is extreme. The adelle is blooming. The adelle is monaural. The adelle is not provencal. The adelle does not like the barn. The adelle misplace the barn. If something uncurl the barn then it smack the adelle. If something uncurl the barn and it uncurl the adelle then the barn is not provencal. If something smack the barn and it does not chase the adelle then the adelle uncurl the barn. If something uncurl the adelle then it uncurl the barn. If something is provencal then it does not see the adelle. If something uncurl the adelle and it does not like the adelle then the adelle misplace the barn. The barn is not kind.", "logic": "\nUncurl(barn, adelle)\nExtreme(barn)\nBlooming(barn)\nUncurl(adelle, barn)\nExtreme(adelle)\nBlooming(adelle)\nMonaural(adelle)\nnot Provencal(adelle)\nnot Smack(adelle, barn)\nMisplace(adelle, barn)\nforall x (Uncurl(x, barn) -> Smack(x, adelle))\nforall x (Uncurl(x, barn) and Uncurl(x, adelle) -> not Provencal(barn))\nforall x (Smack(x, barn) and not Uncurl(x, adelle) -> Uncurl(adelle, barn))\nforall x (Uncurl(x, adelle) -> Uncurl(x, barn))\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> not Misplace(x, adelle))\nforall x (Uncurl(x, adelle) and not Smack(x, adelle) -> Misplace(adelle, barn))\n\nnot Kind(barn)\n\nnot Kind(barn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The kania forswear the libbey. The kania is blameable. The kania is perfected. The libbey forswear the kania. The libbey is blameable. The libbey is perfected. The libbey is starlike. The libbey is not undefeated. The libbey does not like the kania. The libbey freshen the kania. If something forswear the kania then it initialize the libbey. If something forswear the kania and it forswear the libbey then the kania is not undefeated. If something initialize the kania and it does not chase the libbey then the libbey forswear the kania. If something forswear the libbey then it forswear the kania. If something is undefeated then it does not see the libbey. If something forswear the libbey and it does not like the libbey then the libbey freshen the kania. The kania freshen the kania.", "logic": "\nForswear(kania, libbey)\nBlameable(kania)\nPerfected(kania)\nForswear(libbey, kania)\nBlameable(libbey)\nPerfected(libbey)\nStarlike(libbey)\nnot Undefeated(libbey)\nnot Initialize(libbey, kania)\nFreshen(libbey, kania)\nforall x (Forswear(x, kania) -> Initialize(x, libbey))\nforall x (Forswear(x, kania) and Forswear(x, libbey) -> not Undefeated(kania))\nforall x (Initialize(x, kania) and not Forswear(x, libbey) -> Forswear(libbey, kania))\nforall x (Forswear(x, libbey) -> Forswear(x, kania))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) -> not Freshen(x, libbey))\nforall x (Forswear(x, libbey) and not Initialize(x, libbey) -> Freshen(libbey, kania))\n\nFreshen(kania, kania)\n\nFreshen(kania, kania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The abdul last the myriam. The abdul is urogenital. The abdul is nettled. The myriam last the abdul. The myriam is urogenital. The myriam is nettled. The myriam is manorial. The myriam is not lithesome. The myriam does not like the abdul. The myriam cling the abdul. If something last the abdul then it becalm the myriam. If something last the abdul and it last the myriam then the abdul is not lithesome. If something becalm the abdul and it does not chase the myriam then the myriam last the abdul. If something last the myriam then it last the abdul. If something is lithesome then it does not see the myriam. If something last the myriam and it does not like the myriam then the myriam cling the abdul. The myriam does not chase the myriam.", "logic": "\nLast(abdul, myriam)\nUrogenital(abdul)\nNettled(abdul)\nLast(myriam, abdul)\nUrogenital(myriam)\nNettled(myriam)\nManorial(myriam)\nnot Lithesome(myriam)\nnot Becalm(myriam, abdul)\nCling(myriam, abdul)\nforall x (Last(x, abdul) -> Becalm(x, myriam))\nforall x (Last(x, abdul) and Last(x, myriam) -> not Lithesome(abdul))\nforall x (Becalm(x, abdul) and not Last(x, myriam) -> Last(myriam, abdul))\nforall x (Last(x, myriam) -> Last(x, abdul))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> not Cling(x, myriam))\nforall x (Last(x, myriam) and not Becalm(x, myriam) -> Cling(myriam, abdul))\n\nnot Last(myriam, myriam)\n\nnot Last(myriam, myriam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The dot crawl the mellie. The dot is botonnee. The dot is invasive. The mellie crawl the dot. The mellie is botonnee. The mellie is invasive. The mellie is mere. The mellie is not sallow. The mellie does not like the dot. The mellie pulsate the dot. If something crawl the dot then it dazzle the mellie. If something crawl the dot and it crawl the mellie then the dot is not sallow. If something dazzle the dot and it does not chase the mellie then the mellie crawl the dot. If something crawl the mellie then it crawl the dot. If something is sallow then it does not see the mellie. If something crawl the mellie and it does not like the mellie then the mellie pulsate the dot. The dot pulsate the mellie.", "logic": "\nCrawl(dot, mellie)\nBotonnee(dot)\nInvasive(dot)\nCrawl(mellie, dot)\nBotonnee(mellie)\nInvasive(mellie)\nMere(mellie)\nnot Sallow(mellie)\nnot Dazzle(mellie, dot)\nPulsate(mellie, dot)\nforall x (Crawl(x, dot) -> Dazzle(x, mellie))\nforall x (Crawl(x, dot) and Crawl(x, mellie) -> not Sallow(dot))\nforall x (Dazzle(x, dot) and not Crawl(x, mellie) -> Crawl(mellie, dot))\nforall x (Crawl(x, mellie) -> Crawl(x, dot))\nforall x (Sallow(x) -> not Pulsate(x, mellie))\nforall x (Crawl(x, mellie) and not Dazzle(x, mellie) -> Pulsate(mellie, dot))\n\nPulsate(dot, mellie)\n\nPulsate(dot, mellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The hayes interview the sasha. The hayes is metastable. The hayes is geniculate. The sasha interview the hayes. The sasha is metastable. The sasha is geniculate. The sasha is olive. The sasha is not piffling. The sasha does not like the hayes. The sasha dissociate the hayes. If something interview the hayes then it loaf the sasha. If something interview the hayes and it interview the sasha then the hayes is not piffling. If something loaf the hayes and it does not chase the sasha then the sasha interview the hayes. If something interview the sasha then it interview the hayes. If something is piffling then it does not see the sasha. If something interview the sasha and it does not like the sasha then the sasha dissociate the hayes. The sasha is not kind.", "logic": "\nInterview(hayes, sasha)\nMetastable(hayes)\nGeniculate(hayes)\nInterview(sasha, hayes)\nMetastable(sasha)\nGeniculate(sasha)\nOlive(sasha)\nnot Piffling(sasha)\nnot Loaf(sasha, hayes)\nDissociate(sasha, hayes)\nforall x (Interview(x, hayes) -> Loaf(x, sasha))\nforall x (Interview(x, hayes) and Interview(x, sasha) -> not Piffling(hayes))\nforall x (Loaf(x, hayes) and not Interview(x, sasha) -> Interview(sasha, hayes))\nforall x (Interview(x, sasha) -> Interview(x, hayes))\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> not Dissociate(x, sasha))\nforall x (Interview(x, sasha) and not Loaf(x, sasha) -> Dissociate(sasha, hayes))\n\nnot Kind(sasha)\n\nnot Kind(sasha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The giffard bide the laverna. The giffard is irregular. The giffard is crowing. The laverna bide the giffard. The laverna is irregular. The laverna is crowing. The laverna is twofold. The laverna is not palmar. The laverna does not like the giffard. The laverna cognize the giffard. If something bide the giffard then it denominate the laverna. If something bide the giffard and it bide the laverna then the giffard is not palmar. If something denominate the giffard and it does not chase the laverna then the laverna bide the giffard. If something bide the laverna then it bide the giffard. If something is palmar then it does not see the laverna. If something bide the laverna and it does not like the laverna then the laverna cognize the giffard. The laverna cognize the laverna.", "logic": "\nBide(giffard, laverna)\nIrregular(giffard)\nCrowing(giffard)\nBide(laverna, giffard)\nIrregular(laverna)\nCrowing(laverna)\nTwofold(laverna)\nnot Palmar(laverna)\nnot Denominate(laverna, giffard)\nCognize(laverna, giffard)\nforall x (Bide(x, giffard) -> Denominate(x, laverna))\nforall x (Bide(x, giffard) and Bide(x, laverna) -> not Palmar(giffard))\nforall x (Denominate(x, giffard) and not Bide(x, laverna) -> Bide(laverna, giffard))\nforall x (Bide(x, laverna) -> Bide(x, giffard))\nforall x (Palmar(x) -> not Cognize(x, laverna))\nforall x (Bide(x, laverna) and not Denominate(x, laverna) -> Cognize(laverna, giffard))\n\nCognize(laverna, laverna)\n\nCognize(laverna, laverna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-205"} {"premises": "The roseann is not blameless. The roseann is phenomenal. The roseann is canary. The roseann defat the will. The roseann defat the elly. The roseann honey the will. The roseann evoke the will. The roseann evoke the elly. The will is frosty. The elly is frosty. The elly is canary. The elly defat the will. The elly honey the roseann. The elly does not need the will. The elly does not see the will. If the roseann honey the will then the will honey the roseann. If someone evoke the roseann and the roseann is phenomenal then the roseann does not like the will. If someone honey the roseann then the roseann is frosty. If the will honey the roseann then the will is canary. If the roseann is frosty and the roseann is not phenomenal then the roseann honey the will. If the elly is frosty and the will does not need the elly then the will evoke the elly. The elly does not need the will.", "logic": "\nnot Blameless(roseann)\nPhenomenal(roseann)\nCanary(roseann)\nDefat(roseann, will)\nDefat(roseann, elly)\nHoney(roseann, will)\nEvoke(roseann, will)\nEvoke(roseann, elly)\nFrosty(will)\nFrosty(elly)\nCanary(elly)\nDefat(elly, will)\nHoney(elly, roseann)\nnot Honey(elly, will)\nnot Evoke(elly, will)\nHoney(roseann, will) -> Honey(will, roseann)\nforall x (Evoke(x, roseann) and Phenomenal(roseann) -> not Defat(roseann, will))\nforall x (Honey(x, roseann) -> Frosty(roseann))\nHoney(will, roseann) -> Canary(will)\nFrosty(roseann) and not Phenomenal(roseann) -> Honey(roseann, will)\nFrosty(elly) and not Honey(will, elly) -> Evoke(will, elly)\n\nnot Honey(elly, will)\n\ntherefore not Honey(elly, will)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The carlotta is not laid. The carlotta is agreed. The carlotta is bawdy. The carlotta dismantle the ianthe. The carlotta dismantle the stepha. The carlotta stump the ianthe. The carlotta debilitate the ianthe. The carlotta debilitate the stepha. The ianthe is tender. The stepha is tender. The stepha is bawdy. The stepha dismantle the ianthe. The stepha stump the carlotta. The stepha does not need the ianthe. The stepha does not see the ianthe. If the carlotta stump the ianthe then the ianthe stump the carlotta. If someone debilitate the carlotta and the carlotta is agreed then the carlotta does not like the ianthe. If someone stump the carlotta then the carlotta is tender. If the ianthe stump the carlotta then the ianthe is bawdy. If the carlotta is tender and the carlotta is not agreed then the carlotta stump the ianthe. If the stepha is tender and the ianthe does not need the stepha then the ianthe debilitate the stepha. The ianthe is not tender.", "logic": "\nnot Laid(carlotta)\nAgreed(carlotta)\nBawdy(carlotta)\nDismantle(carlotta, ianthe)\nDismantle(carlotta, stepha)\nStump(carlotta, ianthe)\nDebilitate(carlotta, ianthe)\nDebilitate(carlotta, stepha)\nTender(ianthe)\nTender(stepha)\nBawdy(stepha)\nDismantle(stepha, ianthe)\nStump(stepha, carlotta)\nnot Stump(stepha, ianthe)\nnot Debilitate(stepha, ianthe)\nStump(carlotta, ianthe) -> Stump(ianthe, carlotta)\nforall x (Debilitate(x, carlotta) and Agreed(carlotta) -> not Dismantle(carlotta, ianthe))\nforall x (Stump(x, carlotta) -> Tender(carlotta))\nStump(ianthe, carlotta) -> Bawdy(ianthe)\nTender(carlotta) and not Agreed(carlotta) -> Stump(carlotta, ianthe)\nTender(stepha) and not Stump(ianthe, stepha) -> Debilitate(ianthe, stepha)\n\nnot Tender(ianthe)\n\ntherefore Tender(ianthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The shawnee is not offended. The shawnee is juicy. The shawnee is degage. The shawnee edify the suellen. The shawnee edify the chrissa. The shawnee blurt the suellen. The shawnee find the suellen. The shawnee find the chrissa. The suellen is erasable. The chrissa is erasable. The chrissa is degage. The chrissa edify the suellen. The chrissa blurt the shawnee. The chrissa does not need the suellen. The chrissa does not see the suellen. If the shawnee blurt the suellen then the suellen blurt the shawnee. If someone find the shawnee and the shawnee is juicy then the shawnee does not like the suellen. If someone blurt the shawnee then the shawnee is erasable. If the suellen blurt the shawnee then the suellen is degage. If the shawnee is erasable and the shawnee is not juicy then the shawnee blurt the suellen. If the chrissa is erasable and the suellen does not need the chrissa then the suellen find the chrissa. The suellen blurt the shawnee.", "logic": "\nnot Offended(shawnee)\nJuicy(shawnee)\nDegage(shawnee)\nEdify(shawnee, suellen)\nEdify(shawnee, chrissa)\nBlurt(shawnee, suellen)\nFind(shawnee, suellen)\nFind(shawnee, chrissa)\nErasable(suellen)\nErasable(chrissa)\nDegage(chrissa)\nEdify(chrissa, suellen)\nBlurt(chrissa, shawnee)\nnot Blurt(chrissa, suellen)\nnot Find(chrissa, suellen)\nBlurt(shawnee, suellen) -> Blurt(suellen, shawnee)\nforall x (Find(x, shawnee) and Juicy(shawnee) -> not Edify(shawnee, suellen))\nforall x (Blurt(x, shawnee) -> Erasable(shawnee))\nBlurt(suellen, shawnee) -> Degage(suellen)\nErasable(shawnee) and not Juicy(shawnee) -> Blurt(shawnee, suellen)\nErasable(chrissa) and not Blurt(suellen, chrissa) -> Find(suellen, chrissa)\n\nBlurt(suellen, shawnee)\n\nBlurt(shawnee, suellen) and Blurt(shawnee, suellen) -> Blurt(suellen, shawnee) -> therefore Blurt(suellen, shawnee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The agustin is not cubital. The agustin is divine. The agustin is ammoniacal. The agustin discipline the mira. The agustin discipline the reeba. The agustin fricassee the mira. The agustin lucubrate the mira. The agustin lucubrate the reeba. The mira is barred. The reeba is barred. The reeba is ammoniacal. The reeba discipline the mira. The reeba fricassee the agustin. The reeba does not need the mira. The reeba does not see the mira. If the agustin fricassee the mira then the mira fricassee the agustin. If someone lucubrate the agustin and the agustin is divine then the agustin does not like the mira. If someone fricassee the agustin then the agustin is barred. If the mira fricassee the agustin then the mira is ammoniacal. If the agustin is barred and the agustin is not divine then the agustin fricassee the mira. If the reeba is barred and the mira does not need the reeba then the mira lucubrate the reeba. The agustin is not barred.", "logic": "\nnot Cubital(agustin)\nDivine(agustin)\nAmmoniacal(agustin)\nDiscipline(agustin, mira)\nDiscipline(agustin, reeba)\nFricassee(agustin, mira)\nLucubrate(agustin, mira)\nLucubrate(agustin, reeba)\nBarred(mira)\nBarred(reeba)\nAmmoniacal(reeba)\nDiscipline(reeba, mira)\nFricassee(reeba, agustin)\nnot Fricassee(reeba, mira)\nnot Lucubrate(reeba, mira)\nFricassee(agustin, mira) -> Fricassee(mira, agustin)\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, agustin) and Divine(agustin) -> not Discipline(agustin, mira))\nforall x (Fricassee(x, agustin) -> Barred(agustin))\nFricassee(mira, agustin) -> Ammoniacal(mira)\nBarred(agustin) and not Divine(agustin) -> Fricassee(agustin, mira)\nBarred(reeba) and not Fricassee(mira, reeba) -> Lucubrate(mira, reeba)\n\nnot Barred(agustin)\n\nFricassee(reeba, agustin) and forall x (Fricassee(x, agustin) -> Barred(agustin)) -> therefore Barred(agustin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The devora is not somali. The devora is offended. The devora is uveous. The devora singe the maurene. The devora singe the myrilla. The devora disprove the maurene. The devora hyphenate the maurene. The devora hyphenate the myrilla. The maurene is ingrowing. The myrilla is ingrowing. The myrilla is uveous. The myrilla singe the maurene. The myrilla disprove the devora. The myrilla does not need the maurene. The myrilla does not see the maurene. If the devora disprove the maurene then the maurene disprove the devora. If someone hyphenate the devora and the devora is offended then the devora does not like the maurene. If someone disprove the devora then the devora is ingrowing. If the maurene disprove the devora then the maurene is uveous. If the devora is ingrowing and the devora is not offended then the devora disprove the maurene. If the myrilla is ingrowing and the maurene does not need the myrilla then the maurene hyphenate the myrilla. The maurene is uveous.", "logic": "\nnot Somali(devora)\nOffended(devora)\nUveous(devora)\nSinge(devora, maurene)\nSinge(devora, myrilla)\nDisprove(devora, maurene)\nHyphenate(devora, maurene)\nHyphenate(devora, myrilla)\nIngrowing(maurene)\nIngrowing(myrilla)\nUveous(myrilla)\nSinge(myrilla, maurene)\nDisprove(myrilla, devora)\nnot Disprove(myrilla, maurene)\nnot Hyphenate(myrilla, maurene)\nDisprove(devora, maurene) -> Disprove(maurene, devora)\nforall x (Hyphenate(x, devora) and Offended(devora) -> not Singe(devora, maurene))\nforall x (Disprove(x, devora) -> Ingrowing(devora))\nDisprove(maurene, devora) -> Uveous(maurene)\nIngrowing(devora) and not Offended(devora) -> Disprove(devora, maurene)\nIngrowing(myrilla) and not Disprove(maurene, myrilla) -> Hyphenate(maurene, myrilla)\n\nUveous(maurene)\n\nDisprove(devora, maurene) and Disprove(devora, maurene) -> Disprove(maurene, devora) -> therefore Disprove(maurene, devora) Disprove(maurene, devora) and Disprove(maurene, devora) -> Uveous(maurene) -> therefore Uveous(maurene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The tedrick is not executive. The tedrick is brumal. The tedrick is homocyclic. The tedrick nickname the seamus. The tedrick nickname the jilly. The tedrick deter the seamus. The tedrick flare the seamus. The tedrick flare the jilly. The seamus is koranic. The jilly is koranic. The jilly is homocyclic. The jilly nickname the seamus. The jilly deter the tedrick. The jilly does not need the seamus. The jilly does not see the seamus. If the tedrick deter the seamus then the seamus deter the tedrick. If someone flare the tedrick and the tedrick is brumal then the tedrick does not like the seamus. If someone deter the tedrick then the tedrick is koranic. If the seamus deter the tedrick then the seamus is homocyclic. If the tedrick is koranic and the tedrick is not brumal then the tedrick deter the seamus. If the jilly is koranic and the seamus does not need the jilly then the seamus flare the jilly. The seamus is not homocyclic.", "logic": "\nnot Executive(tedrick)\nBrumal(tedrick)\nHomocyclic(tedrick)\nNickname(tedrick, seamus)\nNickname(tedrick, jilly)\nDeter(tedrick, seamus)\nFlare(tedrick, seamus)\nFlare(tedrick, jilly)\nKoranic(seamus)\nKoranic(jilly)\nHomocyclic(jilly)\nNickname(jilly, seamus)\nDeter(jilly, tedrick)\nnot Deter(jilly, seamus)\nnot Flare(jilly, seamus)\nDeter(tedrick, seamus) -> Deter(seamus, tedrick)\nforall x (Flare(x, tedrick) and Brumal(tedrick) -> not Nickname(tedrick, seamus))\nforall x (Deter(x, tedrick) -> Koranic(tedrick))\nDeter(seamus, tedrick) -> Homocyclic(seamus)\nKoranic(tedrick) and not Brumal(tedrick) -> Deter(tedrick, seamus)\nKoranic(jilly) and not Deter(seamus, jilly) -> Flare(seamus, jilly)\n\nnot Homocyclic(seamus)\n\nDeter(tedrick, seamus) and Deter(tedrick, seamus) -> Deter(seamus, tedrick) -> therefore Deter(seamus, tedrick) Deter(seamus, tedrick) and Deter(seamus, tedrick) -> Homocyclic(seamus) -> therefore Homocyclic(seamus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The lona is not rosaceous. The lona is liii. The lona is scheduled. The lona reconquer the wendall. The lona reconquer the vivie. The lona clout the wendall. The lona peal the wendall. The lona peal the vivie. The wendall is subliminal. The vivie is subliminal. The vivie is scheduled. The vivie reconquer the wendall. The vivie clout the lona. The vivie does not need the wendall. The vivie does not see the wendall. If the lona clout the wendall then the wendall clout the lona. If someone peal the lona and the lona is liii then the lona does not like the wendall. If someone clout the lona then the lona is subliminal. If the wendall clout the lona then the wendall is scheduled. If the lona is subliminal and the lona is not liii then the lona clout the wendall. If the vivie is subliminal and the wendall does not need the vivie then the wendall peal the vivie. The wendall does not see the vivie.", "logic": "\nnot Rosaceous(lona)\nLiii(lona)\nScheduled(lona)\nReconquer(lona, wendall)\nReconquer(lona, vivie)\nClout(lona, wendall)\nPeal(lona, wendall)\nPeal(lona, vivie)\nSubliminal(wendall)\nSubliminal(vivie)\nScheduled(vivie)\nReconquer(vivie, wendall)\nClout(vivie, lona)\nnot Clout(vivie, wendall)\nnot Peal(vivie, wendall)\nClout(lona, wendall) -> Clout(wendall, lona)\nforall x (Peal(x, lona) and Liii(lona) -> not Reconquer(lona, wendall))\nforall x (Clout(x, lona) -> Subliminal(lona))\nClout(wendall, lona) -> Scheduled(wendall)\nSubliminal(lona) and not Liii(lona) -> Clout(lona, wendall)\nSubliminal(vivie) and not Clout(wendall, vivie) -> Peal(wendall, vivie)\n\nnot Peal(wendall, vivie)\n\nSubliminal(vivie) and not Clout(wendall, vivie) -> Peal(wendall, vivie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The ludwig is not lendable. The ludwig is obstetric. The ludwig is facial. The ludwig inform the buffy. The ludwig inform the jeri. The ludwig glory the buffy. The ludwig restrict the buffy. The ludwig restrict the jeri. The buffy is purging. The jeri is purging. The jeri is facial. The jeri inform the buffy. The jeri glory the ludwig. The jeri does not need the buffy. The jeri does not see the buffy. If the ludwig glory the buffy then the buffy glory the ludwig. If someone restrict the ludwig and the ludwig is obstetric then the ludwig does not like the buffy. If someone glory the ludwig then the ludwig is purging. If the buffy glory the ludwig then the buffy is facial. If the ludwig is purging and the ludwig is not obstetric then the ludwig glory the buffy. If the jeri is purging and the buffy does not need the jeri then the buffy restrict the jeri. The jeri glory the jeri.", "logic": "\nnot Lendable(ludwig)\nObstetric(ludwig)\nFacial(ludwig)\nInform(ludwig, buffy)\nInform(ludwig, jeri)\nGlory(ludwig, buffy)\nRestrict(ludwig, buffy)\nRestrict(ludwig, jeri)\nPurging(buffy)\nPurging(jeri)\nFacial(jeri)\nInform(jeri, buffy)\nGlory(jeri, ludwig)\nnot Glory(jeri, buffy)\nnot Restrict(jeri, buffy)\nGlory(ludwig, buffy) -> Glory(buffy, ludwig)\nforall x (Restrict(x, ludwig) and Obstetric(ludwig) -> not Inform(ludwig, buffy))\nforall x (Glory(x, ludwig) -> Purging(ludwig))\nGlory(buffy, ludwig) -> Facial(buffy)\nPurging(ludwig) and not Obstetric(ludwig) -> Glory(ludwig, buffy)\nPurging(jeri) and not Glory(buffy, jeri) -> Restrict(buffy, jeri)\n\nGlory(jeri, jeri)\n\nGlory(jeri, jeri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The elene is not ireful. The elene is semiotical. The elene is allied. The elene fuse the skylar. The elene fuse the pate. The elene odourise the skylar. The elene perpetrate the skylar. The elene perpetrate the pate. The skylar is graded. The pate is graded. The pate is allied. The pate fuse the skylar. The pate odourise the elene. The pate does not need the skylar. The pate does not see the skylar. If the elene odourise the skylar then the skylar odourise the elene. If someone perpetrate the elene and the elene is semiotical then the elene does not like the skylar. If someone odourise the elene then the elene is graded. If the skylar odourise the elene then the skylar is allied. If the elene is graded and the elene is not semiotical then the elene odourise the skylar. If the pate is graded and the skylar does not need the pate then the skylar perpetrate the pate. The elene does not like the elene.", "logic": "\nnot Ireful(elene)\nSemiotical(elene)\nAllied(elene)\nFuse(elene, skylar)\nFuse(elene, pate)\nOdourise(elene, skylar)\nPerpetrate(elene, skylar)\nPerpetrate(elene, pate)\nGraded(skylar)\nGraded(pate)\nAllied(pate)\nFuse(pate, skylar)\nOdourise(pate, elene)\nnot Odourise(pate, skylar)\nnot Perpetrate(pate, skylar)\nOdourise(elene, skylar) -> Odourise(skylar, elene)\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, elene) and Semiotical(elene) -> not Fuse(elene, skylar))\nforall x (Odourise(x, elene) -> Graded(elene))\nOdourise(skylar, elene) -> Allied(skylar)\nGraded(elene) and not Semiotical(elene) -> Odourise(elene, skylar)\nGraded(pate) and not Odourise(skylar, pate) -> Perpetrate(skylar, pate)\n\nnot Fuse(elene, elene)\n\nnot Fuse(elene, elene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The wiatt is not ruined. The wiatt is caller. The wiatt is bibless. The wiatt cage the pollyanna. The wiatt cage the curt. The wiatt vitalize the pollyanna. The wiatt spade the pollyanna. The wiatt spade the curt. The pollyanna is idle. The curt is idle. The curt is bibless. The curt cage the pollyanna. The curt vitalize the wiatt. The curt does not need the pollyanna. The curt does not see the pollyanna. If the wiatt vitalize the pollyanna then the pollyanna vitalize the wiatt. If someone spade the wiatt and the wiatt is caller then the wiatt does not like the pollyanna. If someone vitalize the wiatt then the wiatt is idle. If the pollyanna vitalize the wiatt then the pollyanna is bibless. If the wiatt is idle and the wiatt is not caller then the wiatt vitalize the pollyanna. If the curt is idle and the pollyanna does not need the curt then the pollyanna spade the curt. The wiatt vitalize the curt.", "logic": "\nnot Ruined(wiatt)\nCaller(wiatt)\nBibless(wiatt)\nCage(wiatt, pollyanna)\nCage(wiatt, curt)\nVitalize(wiatt, pollyanna)\nSpade(wiatt, pollyanna)\nSpade(wiatt, curt)\nIdle(pollyanna)\nIdle(curt)\nBibless(curt)\nCage(curt, pollyanna)\nVitalize(curt, wiatt)\nnot Vitalize(curt, pollyanna)\nnot Spade(curt, pollyanna)\nVitalize(wiatt, pollyanna) -> Vitalize(pollyanna, wiatt)\nforall x (Spade(x, wiatt) and Caller(wiatt) -> not Cage(wiatt, pollyanna))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, wiatt) -> Idle(wiatt))\nVitalize(pollyanna, wiatt) -> Bibless(pollyanna)\nIdle(wiatt) and not Caller(wiatt) -> Vitalize(wiatt, pollyanna)\nIdle(curt) and not Vitalize(pollyanna, curt) -> Spade(pollyanna, curt)\n\nVitalize(wiatt, curt)\n\nVitalize(wiatt, curt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The reed is not weighted. The reed is forgotten. The reed is colour. The reed crock the saudra. The reed crock the thor. The reed glamourize the saudra. The reed spear the saudra. The reed spear the thor. The saudra is iniquitous. The thor is iniquitous. The thor is colour. The thor crock the saudra. The thor glamourize the reed. The thor does not need the saudra. The thor does not see the saudra. If the reed glamourize the saudra then the saudra glamourize the reed. If someone spear the reed and the reed is forgotten then the reed does not like the saudra. If someone glamourize the reed then the reed is iniquitous. If the saudra glamourize the reed then the saudra is colour. If the reed is iniquitous and the reed is not forgotten then the reed glamourize the saudra. If the thor is iniquitous and the saudra does not need the thor then the saudra spear the thor. The saudra is not weighted.", "logic": "\nnot Weighted(reed)\nForgotten(reed)\nColour(reed)\nCrock(reed, saudra)\nCrock(reed, thor)\nGlamourize(reed, saudra)\nSpear(reed, saudra)\nSpear(reed, thor)\nIniquitous(saudra)\nIniquitous(thor)\nColour(thor)\nCrock(thor, saudra)\nGlamourize(thor, reed)\nnot Glamourize(thor, saudra)\nnot Spear(thor, saudra)\nGlamourize(reed, saudra) -> Glamourize(saudra, reed)\nforall x (Spear(x, reed) and Forgotten(reed) -> not Crock(reed, saudra))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, reed) -> Iniquitous(reed))\nGlamourize(saudra, reed) -> Colour(saudra)\nIniquitous(reed) and not Forgotten(reed) -> Glamourize(reed, saudra)\nIniquitous(thor) and not Glamourize(saudra, thor) -> Spear(saudra, thor)\n\nnot Weighted(saudra)\n\nnot Weighted(saudra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The olivier is not successful. The olivier is uricosuric. The olivier is painful. The olivier syllogize the caralie. The olivier syllogize the tymon. The olivier despair the caralie. The olivier queer the caralie. The olivier queer the tymon. The caralie is catalatic. The tymon is catalatic. The tymon is painful. The tymon syllogize the caralie. The tymon despair the olivier. The tymon does not need the caralie. The tymon does not see the caralie. If the olivier despair the caralie then the caralie despair the olivier. If someone queer the olivier and the olivier is uricosuric then the olivier does not like the caralie. If someone despair the olivier then the olivier is catalatic. If the caralie despair the olivier then the caralie is painful. If the olivier is catalatic and the olivier is not uricosuric then the olivier despair the caralie. If the tymon is catalatic and the caralie does not need the tymon then the caralie queer the tymon. The caralie syllogize the caralie.", "logic": "\nnot Successful(olivier)\nUricosuric(olivier)\nPainful(olivier)\nSyllogize(olivier, caralie)\nSyllogize(olivier, tymon)\nDespair(olivier, caralie)\nQueer(olivier, caralie)\nQueer(olivier, tymon)\nCatalatic(caralie)\nCatalatic(tymon)\nPainful(tymon)\nSyllogize(tymon, caralie)\nDespair(tymon, olivier)\nnot Despair(tymon, caralie)\nnot Queer(tymon, caralie)\nDespair(olivier, caralie) -> Despair(caralie, olivier)\nforall x (Queer(x, olivier) and Uricosuric(olivier) -> not Syllogize(olivier, caralie))\nforall x (Despair(x, olivier) -> Catalatic(olivier))\nDespair(caralie, olivier) -> Painful(caralie)\nCatalatic(olivier) and not Uricosuric(olivier) -> Despair(olivier, caralie)\nCatalatic(tymon) and not Despair(caralie, tymon) -> Queer(caralie, tymon)\n\nSyllogize(caralie, caralie)\n\nSyllogize(caralie, caralie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-879"} {"premises": "The ronda charge the garrot. The ronda is touristed. The ronda is gassy. The ronda is contested. The ronda is located. The ronda is wanton. The ronda lance the garrot. The ronda cloture the garrot. The garrot charge the ronda. The garrot is touristed. The garrot is gassy. The garrot is contested. The garrot is located. The garrot is wanton. The garrot lance the ronda. The garrot cloture the ronda. If someone charge the garrot then they see the garrot. If the garrot charge the ronda then the ronda is wanton. If someone is wanton and they see the ronda then they eat the garrot. If someone lance the garrot then the garrot is touristed. If someone charge the garrot then they need the ronda. If someone lance the garrot and the garrot lance the ronda then the garrot is touristed. The garrot is contested.", "logic": "\nCharge(ronda, garrot)\nTouristed(ronda)\nGassy(ronda)\nContested(ronda)\nLocated(ronda)\nWanton(ronda)\nLance(ronda, garrot)\nCloture(ronda, garrot)\nCharge(garrot, ronda)\nTouristed(garrot)\nGassy(garrot)\nContested(garrot)\nLocated(garrot)\nWanton(garrot)\nLance(garrot, ronda)\nCloture(garrot, ronda)\nforall x (Charge(x, garrot) -> Cloture(x, garrot))\nCharge(garrot, ronda) -> Wanton(ronda)\nforall x (Wanton(x) and Cloture(x, ronda) -> Charge(x, garrot))\nforall x (Lance(x, garrot) -> Touristed(garrot))\nforall x (Charge(x, garrot) -> Lance(x, ronda))\nforall x (Lance(x, garrot) and Lance(garrot, ronda) -> Touristed(garrot))\n\nContested(garrot)\n\ntherefore Contested(garrot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The frazier intercede the rocky. The frazier is tonguelike. The frazier is inaccurate. The frazier is forbearing. The frazier is enervating. The frazier is bordered. The frazier overjoy the rocky. The frazier foreshow the rocky. The rocky intercede the frazier. The rocky is tonguelike. The rocky is inaccurate. The rocky is forbearing. The rocky is enervating. The rocky is bordered. The rocky overjoy the frazier. The rocky foreshow the frazier. If someone intercede the rocky then they see the rocky. If the rocky intercede the frazier then the frazier is bordered. If someone is bordered and they see the frazier then they eat the rocky. If someone overjoy the rocky then the rocky is tonguelike. If someone intercede the rocky then they need the frazier. If someone overjoy the rocky and the rocky overjoy the frazier then the rocky is tonguelike. The frazier is not enervating.", "logic": "\nIntercede(frazier, rocky)\nTonguelike(frazier)\nInaccurate(frazier)\nForbearing(frazier)\nEnervating(frazier)\nBordered(frazier)\nOverjoy(frazier, rocky)\nForeshow(frazier, rocky)\nIntercede(rocky, frazier)\nTonguelike(rocky)\nInaccurate(rocky)\nForbearing(rocky)\nEnervating(rocky)\nBordered(rocky)\nOverjoy(rocky, frazier)\nForeshow(rocky, frazier)\nforall x (Intercede(x, rocky) -> Foreshow(x, rocky))\nIntercede(rocky, frazier) -> Bordered(frazier)\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Foreshow(x, frazier) -> Intercede(x, rocky))\nforall x (Overjoy(x, rocky) -> Tonguelike(rocky))\nforall x (Intercede(x, rocky) -> Overjoy(x, frazier))\nforall x (Overjoy(x, rocky) and Overjoy(rocky, frazier) -> Tonguelike(rocky))\n\nnot Enervating(frazier)\n\ntherefore Enervating(frazier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The barbabra extirpate the jewel. The barbabra is slurred. The barbabra is unshackled. The barbabra is mucosal. The barbabra is romani. The barbabra is radio. The barbabra reprieve the jewel. The barbabra unclutter the jewel. The jewel extirpate the barbabra. The jewel is slurred. The jewel is unshackled. The jewel is mucosal. The jewel is romani. The jewel is radio. The jewel reprieve the barbabra. The jewel unclutter the barbabra. If someone extirpate the jewel then they see the jewel. If the jewel extirpate the barbabra then the barbabra is radio. If someone is radio and they see the barbabra then they eat the jewel. If someone reprieve the jewel then the jewel is slurred. If someone extirpate the jewel then they need the barbabra. If someone reprieve the jewel and the jewel reprieve the barbabra then the jewel is slurred. The jewel extirpate the jewel.", "logic": "\nExtirpate(barbabra, jewel)\nSlurred(barbabra)\nUnshackled(barbabra)\nMucosal(barbabra)\nRomani(barbabra)\nRadio(barbabra)\nReprieve(barbabra, jewel)\nUnclutter(barbabra, jewel)\nExtirpate(jewel, barbabra)\nSlurred(jewel)\nUnshackled(jewel)\nMucosal(jewel)\nRomani(jewel)\nRadio(jewel)\nReprieve(jewel, barbabra)\nUnclutter(jewel, barbabra)\nforall x (Extirpate(x, jewel) -> Unclutter(x, jewel))\nExtirpate(jewel, barbabra) -> Radio(barbabra)\nforall x (Radio(x) and Unclutter(x, barbabra) -> Extirpate(x, jewel))\nforall x (Reprieve(x, jewel) -> Slurred(jewel))\nforall x (Extirpate(x, jewel) -> Reprieve(x, barbabra))\nforall x (Reprieve(x, jewel) and Reprieve(jewel, barbabra) -> Slurred(jewel))\n\nExtirpate(jewel, jewel)\n\nRadio(jewel) and Unclutter(jewel, barbabra) and forall x (Radio(x) and Unclutter(x, barbabra) -> Extirpate(x, jewel)) -> therefore Extirpate(jewel, jewel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The corry take the taffy. The corry is puzzling. The corry is apraxic. The corry is estival. The corry is subscript. The corry is diarrheic. The corry blood the taffy. The corry secernate the taffy. The taffy take the corry. The taffy is puzzling. The taffy is apraxic. The taffy is estival. The taffy is subscript. The taffy is diarrheic. The taffy blood the corry. The taffy secernate the corry. If someone take the taffy then they see the taffy. If the taffy take the corry then the corry is diarrheic. If someone is diarrheic and they see the corry then they eat the taffy. If someone blood the taffy then the taffy is puzzling. If someone take the taffy then they need the corry. If someone blood the taffy and the taffy blood the corry then the taffy is puzzling. The taffy does not eat the taffy.", "logic": "\nTake(corry, taffy)\nPuzzling(corry)\nApraxic(corry)\nEstival(corry)\nSubscript(corry)\nDiarrheic(corry)\nBlood(corry, taffy)\nSecernate(corry, taffy)\nTake(taffy, corry)\nPuzzling(taffy)\nApraxic(taffy)\nEstival(taffy)\nSubscript(taffy)\nDiarrheic(taffy)\nBlood(taffy, corry)\nSecernate(taffy, corry)\nforall x (Take(x, taffy) -> Secernate(x, taffy))\nTake(taffy, corry) -> Diarrheic(corry)\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Secernate(x, corry) -> Take(x, taffy))\nforall x (Blood(x, taffy) -> Puzzling(taffy))\nforall x (Take(x, taffy) -> Blood(x, corry))\nforall x (Blood(x, taffy) and Blood(taffy, corry) -> Puzzling(taffy))\n\nnot Take(taffy, taffy)\n\nDiarrheic(taffy) and Secernate(taffy, corry) and forall x (Diarrheic(x) and Secernate(x, corry) -> Take(x, taffy)) -> therefore Take(taffy, taffy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The inesita molt the rene. The inesita is theistic. The inesita is cesarean. The inesita is erasmian. The inesita is slithery. The inesita is fungoid. The inesita emphasize the rene. The inesita coiffure the rene. The rene molt the inesita. The rene is theistic. The rene is cesarean. The rene is erasmian. The rene is slithery. The rene is fungoid. The rene emphasize the inesita. The rene coiffure the inesita. If someone molt the rene then they see the rene. If the rene molt the inesita then the inesita is fungoid. If someone is fungoid and they see the inesita then they eat the rene. If someone emphasize the rene then the rene is theistic. If someone molt the rene then they need the inesita. If someone emphasize the rene and the rene emphasize the inesita then the rene is theistic. The rene coiffure the rene.", "logic": "\nMolt(inesita, rene)\nTheistic(inesita)\nCesarean(inesita)\nErasmian(inesita)\nSlithery(inesita)\nFungoid(inesita)\nEmphasize(inesita, rene)\nCoiffure(inesita, rene)\nMolt(rene, inesita)\nTheistic(rene)\nCesarean(rene)\nErasmian(rene)\nSlithery(rene)\nFungoid(rene)\nEmphasize(rene, inesita)\nCoiffure(rene, inesita)\nforall x (Molt(x, rene) -> Coiffure(x, rene))\nMolt(rene, inesita) -> Fungoid(inesita)\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and Coiffure(x, inesita) -> Molt(x, rene))\nforall x (Emphasize(x, rene) -> Theistic(rene))\nforall x (Molt(x, rene) -> Emphasize(x, inesita))\nforall x (Emphasize(x, rene) and Emphasize(rene, inesita) -> Theistic(rene))\n\nCoiffure(rene, rene)\n\nFungoid(rene) and Coiffure(rene, inesita) and forall x (Fungoid(x) and Coiffure(x, inesita) -> Molt(x, rene)) -> therefore Molt(rene, rene) Molt(rene, rene) and forall x (Molt(x, rene) -> Coiffure(x, rene)) -> therefore Coiffure(rene, rene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The cally train the benetta. The cally is littered. The cally is outlandish. The cally is refined. The cally is serrate. The cally is elvish. The cally dehisce the benetta. The cally fade the benetta. The benetta train the cally. The benetta is littered. The benetta is outlandish. The benetta is refined. The benetta is serrate. The benetta is elvish. The benetta dehisce the cally. The benetta fade the cally. If someone train the benetta then they see the benetta. If the benetta train the cally then the cally is elvish. If someone is elvish and they see the cally then they eat the benetta. If someone dehisce the benetta then the benetta is littered. If someone train the benetta then they need the cally. If someone dehisce the benetta and the benetta dehisce the cally then the benetta is littered. The benetta does not see the benetta.", "logic": "\nTrain(cally, benetta)\nLittered(cally)\nOutlandish(cally)\nRefined(cally)\nSerrate(cally)\nElvish(cally)\nDehisce(cally, benetta)\nFade(cally, benetta)\nTrain(benetta, cally)\nLittered(benetta)\nOutlandish(benetta)\nRefined(benetta)\nSerrate(benetta)\nElvish(benetta)\nDehisce(benetta, cally)\nFade(benetta, cally)\nforall x (Train(x, benetta) -> Fade(x, benetta))\nTrain(benetta, cally) -> Elvish(cally)\nforall x (Elvish(x) and Fade(x, cally) -> Train(x, benetta))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, benetta) -> Littered(benetta))\nforall x (Train(x, benetta) -> Dehisce(x, cally))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, benetta) and Dehisce(benetta, cally) -> Littered(benetta))\n\nnot Fade(benetta, benetta)\n\nElvish(benetta) and Fade(benetta, cally) and forall x (Elvish(x) and Fade(x, cally) -> Train(x, benetta)) -> therefore Train(benetta, benetta) Train(benetta, benetta) and forall x (Train(x, benetta) -> Fade(x, benetta)) -> therefore Fade(benetta, benetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The shanon toast the brandais. The shanon is numberless. The shanon is germinal. The shanon is flatulent. The shanon is basaltic. The shanon is agnostical. The shanon adorn the brandais. The shanon dope the brandais. The brandais toast the shanon. The brandais is numberless. The brandais is germinal. The brandais is flatulent. The brandais is basaltic. The brandais is agnostical. The brandais adorn the shanon. The brandais dope the shanon. If someone toast the brandais then they see the brandais. If the brandais toast the shanon then the shanon is agnostical. If someone is agnostical and they see the shanon then they eat the brandais. If someone adorn the brandais then the brandais is numberless. If someone toast the brandais then they need the shanon. If someone adorn the brandais and the brandais adorn the shanon then the brandais is numberless. The shanon does not see the shanon.", "logic": "\nToast(shanon, brandais)\nNumberless(shanon)\nGerminal(shanon)\nFlatulent(shanon)\nBasaltic(shanon)\nAgnostical(shanon)\nAdorn(shanon, brandais)\nDope(shanon, brandais)\nToast(brandais, shanon)\nNumberless(brandais)\nGerminal(brandais)\nFlatulent(brandais)\nBasaltic(brandais)\nAgnostical(brandais)\nAdorn(brandais, shanon)\nDope(brandais, shanon)\nforall x (Toast(x, brandais) -> Dope(x, brandais))\nToast(brandais, shanon) -> Agnostical(shanon)\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and Dope(x, shanon) -> Toast(x, brandais))\nforall x (Adorn(x, brandais) -> Numberless(brandais))\nforall x (Toast(x, brandais) -> Adorn(x, shanon))\nforall x (Adorn(x, brandais) and Adorn(brandais, shanon) -> Numberless(brandais))\n\nnot Dope(shanon, shanon)\n\nnot Dope(shanon, shanon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The cynthia popularise the janeta. The cynthia is bald. The cynthia is unbalanced. The cynthia is airless. The cynthia is stretched. The cynthia is partible. The cynthia redo the janeta. The cynthia confess the janeta. The janeta popularise the cynthia. The janeta is bald. The janeta is unbalanced. The janeta is airless. The janeta is stretched. The janeta is partible. The janeta redo the cynthia. The janeta confess the cynthia. If someone popularise the janeta then they see the janeta. If the janeta popularise the cynthia then the cynthia is partible. If someone is partible and they see the cynthia then they eat the janeta. If someone redo the janeta then the janeta is bald. If someone popularise the janeta then they need the cynthia. If someone redo the janeta and the janeta redo the cynthia then the janeta is bald. The janeta redo the janeta.", "logic": "\nPopularise(cynthia, janeta)\nBald(cynthia)\nUnbalanced(cynthia)\nAirless(cynthia)\nStretched(cynthia)\nPartible(cynthia)\nRedo(cynthia, janeta)\nConfess(cynthia, janeta)\nPopularise(janeta, cynthia)\nBald(janeta)\nUnbalanced(janeta)\nAirless(janeta)\nStretched(janeta)\nPartible(janeta)\nRedo(janeta, cynthia)\nConfess(janeta, cynthia)\nforall x (Popularise(x, janeta) -> Confess(x, janeta))\nPopularise(janeta, cynthia) -> Partible(cynthia)\nforall x (Partible(x) and Confess(x, cynthia) -> Popularise(x, janeta))\nforall x (Redo(x, janeta) -> Bald(janeta))\nforall x (Popularise(x, janeta) -> Redo(x, cynthia))\nforall x (Redo(x, janeta) and Redo(janeta, cynthia) -> Bald(janeta))\n\nRedo(janeta, janeta)\n\nRedo(janeta, janeta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2089"} {"premises": "The moshe vagabond the neall. The moshe mewl the garnet. The garnet crumb the neall. The garnet is undamaged. The garnet vagabond the neall. The neall crumb the garnet. The neall crumb the gena. The neall is prepacked. The neall is sprightly. The neall is allopatric. The neall vagabond the garnet. The neall vagabond the gena. The neall mewl the garnet. The gena crumb the garnet. The gena is prepacked. The gena mewl the garnet. If something vagabond the garnet then the garnet crumb the moshe. If something crumb the garnet and the garnet crumb the gena then the garnet crumb the moshe. If the garnet crumb the moshe then the moshe crumb the neall. If something is allopatric and it mewl the moshe then it vagabond the moshe. If something mewl the moshe and it mewl the gena then it vagabond the gena. If something is sprightly and it vagabond the garnet then it mewl the moshe. If something is empty and it mewl the garnet then the garnet vagabond the gena. If the garnet vagabond the moshe and the garnet mewl the neall then the moshe is undamaged. The gena is prepacked.", "logic": "\nVagabond(moshe, neall)\nMewl(moshe, garnet)\nCrumb(garnet, neall)\nUndamaged(garnet)\nVagabond(garnet, neall)\nCrumb(neall, garnet)\nCrumb(neall, gena)\nPrepacked(neall)\nSprightly(neall)\nAllopatric(neall)\nVagabond(neall, garnet)\nVagabond(neall, gena)\nMewl(neall, garnet)\nCrumb(gena, garnet)\nPrepacked(gena)\nMewl(gena, garnet)\nforall x (Vagabond(x, garnet) -> Crumb(garnet, moshe))\nforall x (Crumb(x, garnet) and Crumb(garnet, gena) -> Crumb(garnet, moshe))\nCrumb(garnet, moshe) -> Crumb(moshe, neall)\nforall x (Allopatric(x) and Mewl(x, moshe) -> Vagabond(x, moshe))\nforall x (Mewl(x, moshe) and Mewl(x, gena) -> Vagabond(x, gena))\nforall x (Sprightly(x) and Vagabond(x, garnet) -> Mewl(x, moshe))\nforall x (Empty(x) and Mewl(x, garnet) -> Vagabond(garnet, gena))\nVagabond(garnet, moshe) and Mewl(garnet, neall) -> Undamaged(moshe)\n\nPrepacked(gena)\n\ntherefore Prepacked(gena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The tobias castle the francis. The tobias tinge the elane. The elane deck the francis. The elane is unhindered. The elane castle the francis. The francis deck the elane. The francis deck the mahmud. The francis is carbonated. The francis is peculiar. The francis is illusory. The francis castle the elane. The francis castle the mahmud. The francis tinge the elane. The mahmud deck the elane. The mahmud is carbonated. The mahmud tinge the elane. If something castle the elane then the elane deck the tobias. If something deck the elane and the elane deck the mahmud then the elane deck the tobias. If the elane deck the tobias then the tobias deck the francis. If something is illusory and it tinge the tobias then it castle the tobias. If something tinge the tobias and it tinge the mahmud then it castle the mahmud. If something is peculiar and it castle the elane then it tinge the tobias. If something is lxii and it tinge the elane then the elane castle the mahmud. If the elane castle the tobias and the elane tinge the francis then the tobias is unhindered. The elane does not need the francis.", "logic": "\nCastle(tobias, francis)\nTinge(tobias, elane)\nDeck(elane, francis)\nUnhindered(elane)\nCastle(elane, francis)\nDeck(francis, elane)\nDeck(francis, mahmud)\nCarbonated(francis)\nPeculiar(francis)\nIllusory(francis)\nCastle(francis, elane)\nCastle(francis, mahmud)\nTinge(francis, elane)\nDeck(mahmud, elane)\nCarbonated(mahmud)\nTinge(mahmud, elane)\nforall x (Castle(x, elane) -> Deck(elane, tobias))\nforall x (Deck(x, elane) and Deck(elane, mahmud) -> Deck(elane, tobias))\nDeck(elane, tobias) -> Deck(tobias, francis)\nforall x (Illusory(x) and Tinge(x, tobias) -> Castle(x, tobias))\nforall x (Tinge(x, tobias) and Tinge(x, mahmud) -> Castle(x, mahmud))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) and Castle(x, elane) -> Tinge(x, tobias))\nforall x (Lxii(x) and Tinge(x, elane) -> Castle(elane, mahmud))\nCastle(elane, tobias) and Tinge(elane, francis) -> Unhindered(tobias)\n\nnot Castle(elane, francis)\n\ntherefore Castle(elane, francis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The kirbie furcate the tildi. The kirbie pulp the nonie. The nonie fishtail the tildi. The nonie is stopped. The nonie furcate the tildi. The tildi fishtail the nonie. The tildi fishtail the sande. The tildi is fineable. The tildi is employed. The tildi is nonnatural. The tildi furcate the nonie. The tildi furcate the sande. The tildi pulp the nonie. The sande fishtail the nonie. The sande is fineable. The sande pulp the nonie. If something furcate the nonie then the nonie fishtail the kirbie. If something fishtail the nonie and the nonie fishtail the sande then the nonie fishtail the kirbie. If the nonie fishtail the kirbie then the kirbie fishtail the tildi. If something is nonnatural and it pulp the kirbie then it furcate the kirbie. If something pulp the kirbie and it pulp the sande then it furcate the sande. If something is employed and it furcate the nonie then it pulp the kirbie. If something is sisyphean and it pulp the nonie then the nonie furcate the sande. If the nonie furcate the kirbie and the nonie pulp the tildi then the kirbie is stopped. The tildi pulp the kirbie.", "logic": "\nFurcate(kirbie, tildi)\nPulp(kirbie, nonie)\nFishtail(nonie, tildi)\nStopped(nonie)\nFurcate(nonie, tildi)\nFishtail(tildi, nonie)\nFishtail(tildi, sande)\nFineable(tildi)\nEmployed(tildi)\nNonnatural(tildi)\nFurcate(tildi, nonie)\nFurcate(tildi, sande)\nPulp(tildi, nonie)\nFishtail(sande, nonie)\nFineable(sande)\nPulp(sande, nonie)\nforall x (Furcate(x, nonie) -> Fishtail(nonie, kirbie))\nforall x (Fishtail(x, nonie) and Fishtail(nonie, sande) -> Fishtail(nonie, kirbie))\nFishtail(nonie, kirbie) -> Fishtail(kirbie, tildi)\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Pulp(x, kirbie) -> Furcate(x, kirbie))\nforall x (Pulp(x, kirbie) and Pulp(x, sande) -> Furcate(x, sande))\nforall x (Employed(x) and Furcate(x, nonie) -> Pulp(x, kirbie))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Pulp(x, nonie) -> Furcate(nonie, sande))\nFurcate(nonie, kirbie) and Pulp(nonie, tildi) -> Stopped(kirbie)\n\nPulp(tildi, kirbie)\n\nEmployed(tildi) and Furcate(tildi, nonie) and forall x (Employed(x) and Furcate(x, nonie) -> Pulp(x, kirbie)) -> therefore Pulp(tildi, kirbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The bartel glaciate the eustace. The bartel aggroup the lucie. The lucie berry the eustace. The lucie is starchlike. The lucie glaciate the eustace. The eustace berry the lucie. The eustace berry the cathlene. The eustace is buccal. The eustace is inapt. The eustace is boggy. The eustace glaciate the lucie. The eustace glaciate the cathlene. The eustace aggroup the lucie. The cathlene berry the lucie. The cathlene is buccal. The cathlene aggroup the lucie. If something glaciate the lucie then the lucie berry the bartel. If something berry the lucie and the lucie berry the cathlene then the lucie berry the bartel. If the lucie berry the bartel then the bartel berry the eustace. If something is boggy and it aggroup the bartel then it glaciate the bartel. If something aggroup the bartel and it aggroup the cathlene then it glaciate the cathlene. If something is inapt and it glaciate the lucie then it aggroup the bartel. If something is deprived and it aggroup the lucie then the lucie glaciate the cathlene. If the lucie glaciate the bartel and the lucie aggroup the eustace then the bartel is starchlike. The eustace does not visit the bartel.", "logic": "\nGlaciate(bartel, eustace)\nAggroup(bartel, lucie)\nBerry(lucie, eustace)\nStarchlike(lucie)\nGlaciate(lucie, eustace)\nBerry(eustace, lucie)\nBerry(eustace, cathlene)\nBuccal(eustace)\nInapt(eustace)\nBoggy(eustace)\nGlaciate(eustace, lucie)\nGlaciate(eustace, cathlene)\nAggroup(eustace, lucie)\nBerry(cathlene, lucie)\nBuccal(cathlene)\nAggroup(cathlene, lucie)\nforall x (Glaciate(x, lucie) -> Berry(lucie, bartel))\nforall x (Berry(x, lucie) and Berry(lucie, cathlene) -> Berry(lucie, bartel))\nBerry(lucie, bartel) -> Berry(bartel, eustace)\nforall x (Boggy(x) and Aggroup(x, bartel) -> Glaciate(x, bartel))\nforall x (Aggroup(x, bartel) and Aggroup(x, cathlene) -> Glaciate(x, cathlene))\nforall x (Inapt(x) and Glaciate(x, lucie) -> Aggroup(x, bartel))\nforall x (Deprived(x) and Aggroup(x, lucie) -> Glaciate(lucie, cathlene))\nGlaciate(lucie, bartel) and Aggroup(lucie, eustace) -> Starchlike(bartel)\n\nnot Aggroup(eustace, bartel)\n\nInapt(eustace) and Glaciate(eustace, lucie) and forall x (Inapt(x) and Glaciate(x, lucie) -> Aggroup(x, bartel)) -> therefore Aggroup(eustace, bartel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The carolyn obstruct the averell. The carolyn bunt the griffith. The griffith disbar the averell. The griffith is vigorous. The griffith obstruct the averell. The averell disbar the griffith. The averell disbar the way. The averell is pyrrhic. The averell is staring. The averell is unanimated. The averell obstruct the griffith. The averell obstruct the way. The averell bunt the griffith. The way disbar the griffith. The way is pyrrhic. The way bunt the griffith. If something obstruct the griffith then the griffith disbar the carolyn. If something disbar the griffith and the griffith disbar the way then the griffith disbar the carolyn. If the griffith disbar the carolyn then the carolyn disbar the averell. If something is unanimated and it bunt the carolyn then it obstruct the carolyn. If something bunt the carolyn and it bunt the way then it obstruct the way. If something is staring and it obstruct the griffith then it bunt the carolyn. If something is princely and it bunt the griffith then the griffith obstruct the way. If the griffith obstruct the carolyn and the griffith bunt the averell then the carolyn is vigorous. The carolyn disbar the averell.", "logic": "\nObstruct(carolyn, averell)\nBunt(carolyn, griffith)\nDisbar(griffith, averell)\nVigorous(griffith)\nObstruct(griffith, averell)\nDisbar(averell, griffith)\nDisbar(averell, way)\nPyrrhic(averell)\nStaring(averell)\nUnanimated(averell)\nObstruct(averell, griffith)\nObstruct(averell, way)\nBunt(averell, griffith)\nDisbar(way, griffith)\nPyrrhic(way)\nBunt(way, griffith)\nforall x (Obstruct(x, griffith) -> Disbar(griffith, carolyn))\nforall x (Disbar(x, griffith) and Disbar(griffith, way) -> Disbar(griffith, carolyn))\nDisbar(griffith, carolyn) -> Disbar(carolyn, averell)\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and Bunt(x, carolyn) -> Obstruct(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Bunt(x, carolyn) and Bunt(x, way) -> Obstruct(x, way))\nforall x (Staring(x) and Obstruct(x, griffith) -> Bunt(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Princely(x) and Bunt(x, griffith) -> Obstruct(griffith, way))\nObstruct(griffith, carolyn) and Bunt(griffith, averell) -> Vigorous(carolyn)\n\nDisbar(carolyn, averell)\n\nObstruct(averell, griffith) and forall x (Obstruct(x, griffith) -> Disbar(griffith, carolyn)) -> therefore Disbar(griffith, carolyn) Disbar(griffith, carolyn) and Disbar(griffith, carolyn) -> Disbar(carolyn, averell) -> therefore Disbar(carolyn, averell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The ignaz pauperise the jania. The ignaz wake the legra. The legra teeter the jania. The legra is bilinear. The legra pauperise the jania. The jania teeter the legra. The jania teeter the raymond. The jania is bilgy. The jania is uncomplete. The jania is curst. The jania pauperise the legra. The jania pauperise the raymond. The jania wake the legra. The raymond teeter the legra. The raymond is bilgy. The raymond wake the legra. If something pauperise the legra then the legra teeter the ignaz. If something teeter the legra and the legra teeter the raymond then the legra teeter the ignaz. If the legra teeter the ignaz then the ignaz teeter the jania. If something is curst and it wake the ignaz then it pauperise the ignaz. If something wake the ignaz and it wake the raymond then it pauperise the raymond. If something is uncomplete and it pauperise the legra then it wake the ignaz. If something is previous and it wake the legra then the legra pauperise the raymond. If the legra pauperise the ignaz and the legra wake the jania then the ignaz is bilinear. The ignaz does not eat the jania.", "logic": "\nPauperise(ignaz, jania)\nWake(ignaz, legra)\nTeeter(legra, jania)\nBilinear(legra)\nPauperise(legra, jania)\nTeeter(jania, legra)\nTeeter(jania, raymond)\nBilgy(jania)\nUncomplete(jania)\nCurst(jania)\nPauperise(jania, legra)\nPauperise(jania, raymond)\nWake(jania, legra)\nTeeter(raymond, legra)\nBilgy(raymond)\nWake(raymond, legra)\nforall x (Pauperise(x, legra) -> Teeter(legra, ignaz))\nforall x (Teeter(x, legra) and Teeter(legra, raymond) -> Teeter(legra, ignaz))\nTeeter(legra, ignaz) -> Teeter(ignaz, jania)\nforall x (Curst(x) and Wake(x, ignaz) -> Pauperise(x, ignaz))\nforall x (Wake(x, ignaz) and Wake(x, raymond) -> Pauperise(x, raymond))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Pauperise(x, legra) -> Wake(x, ignaz))\nforall x (Previous(x) and Wake(x, legra) -> Pauperise(legra, raymond))\nPauperise(legra, ignaz) and Wake(legra, jania) -> Bilinear(ignaz)\n\nnot Teeter(ignaz, jania)\n\nPauperise(jania, legra) and forall x (Pauperise(x, legra) -> Teeter(legra, ignaz)) -> therefore Teeter(legra, ignaz) Teeter(legra, ignaz) and Teeter(legra, ignaz) -> Teeter(ignaz, jania) -> therefore Teeter(ignaz, jania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The eirena beware the dina. The eirena unhitch the bellina. The bellina doss the dina. The bellina is tetchy. The bellina beware the dina. The dina doss the bellina. The dina doss the durward. The dina is intriguing. The dina is smuggled. The dina is pinnate. The dina beware the bellina. The dina beware the durward. The dina unhitch the bellina. The durward doss the bellina. The durward is intriguing. The durward unhitch the bellina. If something beware the bellina then the bellina doss the eirena. If something doss the bellina and the bellina doss the durward then the bellina doss the eirena. If the bellina doss the eirena then the eirena doss the dina. If something is pinnate and it unhitch the eirena then it beware the eirena. If something unhitch the eirena and it unhitch the durward then it beware the durward. If something is smuggled and it beware the bellina then it unhitch the eirena. If something is diffident and it unhitch the bellina then the bellina beware the durward. If the bellina beware the eirena and the bellina unhitch the dina then the eirena is tetchy. The eirena does not visit the eirena.", "logic": "\nBeware(eirena, dina)\nUnhitch(eirena, bellina)\nDoss(bellina, dina)\nTetchy(bellina)\nBeware(bellina, dina)\nDoss(dina, bellina)\nDoss(dina, durward)\nIntriguing(dina)\nSmuggled(dina)\nPinnate(dina)\nBeware(dina, bellina)\nBeware(dina, durward)\nUnhitch(dina, bellina)\nDoss(durward, bellina)\nIntriguing(durward)\nUnhitch(durward, bellina)\nforall x (Beware(x, bellina) -> Doss(bellina, eirena))\nforall x (Doss(x, bellina) and Doss(bellina, durward) -> Doss(bellina, eirena))\nDoss(bellina, eirena) -> Doss(eirena, dina)\nforall x (Pinnate(x) and Unhitch(x, eirena) -> Beware(x, eirena))\nforall x (Unhitch(x, eirena) and Unhitch(x, durward) -> Beware(x, durward))\nforall x (Smuggled(x) and Beware(x, bellina) -> Unhitch(x, eirena))\nforall x (Diffident(x) and Unhitch(x, bellina) -> Beware(bellina, durward))\nBeware(bellina, eirena) and Unhitch(bellina, dina) -> Tetchy(eirena)\n\nnot Unhitch(eirena, eirena)\n\nforall x (Smuggled(x) and Beware(x, bellina) -> Unhitch(x, eirena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The gwendolyn fabricate the jeniece. The gwendolyn trammel the adrienne. The adrienne swoosh the jeniece. The adrienne is cumulous. The adrienne fabricate the jeniece. The jeniece swoosh the adrienne. The jeniece swoosh the hillel. The jeniece is cynical. The jeniece is unflawed. The jeniece is flukey. The jeniece fabricate the adrienne. The jeniece fabricate the hillel. The jeniece trammel the adrienne. The hillel swoosh the adrienne. The hillel is cynical. The hillel trammel the adrienne. If something fabricate the adrienne then the adrienne swoosh the gwendolyn. If something swoosh the adrienne and the adrienne swoosh the hillel then the adrienne swoosh the gwendolyn. If the adrienne swoosh the gwendolyn then the gwendolyn swoosh the jeniece. If something is flukey and it trammel the gwendolyn then it fabricate the gwendolyn. If something trammel the gwendolyn and it trammel the hillel then it fabricate the hillel. If something is unflawed and it fabricate the adrienne then it trammel the gwendolyn. If something is clueless and it trammel the adrienne then the adrienne fabricate the hillel. If the adrienne fabricate the gwendolyn and the adrienne trammel the jeniece then the gwendolyn is cumulous. The hillel fabricate the hillel.", "logic": "\nFabricate(gwendolyn, jeniece)\nTrammel(gwendolyn, adrienne)\nSwoosh(adrienne, jeniece)\nCumulous(adrienne)\nFabricate(adrienne, jeniece)\nSwoosh(jeniece, adrienne)\nSwoosh(jeniece, hillel)\nCynical(jeniece)\nUnflawed(jeniece)\nFlukey(jeniece)\nFabricate(jeniece, adrienne)\nFabricate(jeniece, hillel)\nTrammel(jeniece, adrienne)\nSwoosh(hillel, adrienne)\nCynical(hillel)\nTrammel(hillel, adrienne)\nforall x (Fabricate(x, adrienne) -> Swoosh(adrienne, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Swoosh(x, adrienne) and Swoosh(adrienne, hillel) -> Swoosh(adrienne, gwendolyn))\nSwoosh(adrienne, gwendolyn) -> Swoosh(gwendolyn, jeniece)\nforall x (Flukey(x) and Trammel(x, gwendolyn) -> Fabricate(x, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Trammel(x, gwendolyn) and Trammel(x, hillel) -> Fabricate(x, hillel))\nforall x (Unflawed(x) and Fabricate(x, adrienne) -> Trammel(x, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Clueless(x) and Trammel(x, adrienne) -> Fabricate(adrienne, hillel))\nFabricate(adrienne, gwendolyn) and Trammel(adrienne, jeniece) -> Cumulous(gwendolyn)\n\nFabricate(hillel, hillel)\n\nforall x (Trammel(x, gwendolyn) and Trammel(x, hillel) -> Fabricate(x, hillel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The nichol spondaise the claude. The nichol warehouse the jere. The jere dote the claude. The jere is bigheaded. The jere spondaise the claude. The claude dote the jere. The claude dote the marian. The claude is showy. The claude is tickling. The claude is lavender. The claude spondaise the jere. The claude spondaise the marian. The claude warehouse the jere. The marian dote the jere. The marian is showy. The marian warehouse the jere. If something spondaise the jere then the jere dote the nichol. If something dote the jere and the jere dote the marian then the jere dote the nichol. If the jere dote the nichol then the nichol dote the claude. If something is lavender and it warehouse the nichol then it spondaise the nichol. If something warehouse the nichol and it warehouse the marian then it spondaise the marian. If something is tickling and it spondaise the jere then it warehouse the nichol. If something is pulverized and it warehouse the jere then the jere spondaise the marian. If the jere spondaise the nichol and the jere warehouse the claude then the nichol is bigheaded. The jere does not visit the nichol.", "logic": "\nSpondaise(nichol, claude)\nWarehouse(nichol, jere)\nDote(jere, claude)\nBigheaded(jere)\nSpondaise(jere, claude)\nDote(claude, jere)\nDote(claude, marian)\nShowy(claude)\nTickling(claude)\nLavender(claude)\nSpondaise(claude, jere)\nSpondaise(claude, marian)\nWarehouse(claude, jere)\nDote(marian, jere)\nShowy(marian)\nWarehouse(marian, jere)\nforall x (Spondaise(x, jere) -> Dote(jere, nichol))\nforall x (Dote(x, jere) and Dote(jere, marian) -> Dote(jere, nichol))\nDote(jere, nichol) -> Dote(nichol, claude)\nforall x (Lavender(x) and Warehouse(x, nichol) -> Spondaise(x, nichol))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, nichol) and Warehouse(x, marian) -> Spondaise(x, marian))\nforall x (Tickling(x) and Spondaise(x, jere) -> Warehouse(x, nichol))\nforall x (Pulverized(x) and Warehouse(x, jere) -> Spondaise(jere, marian))\nSpondaise(jere, nichol) and Warehouse(jere, claude) -> Bigheaded(nichol)\n\nnot Warehouse(jere, nichol)\n\nforall x (Tickling(x) and Spondaise(x, jere) -> Warehouse(x, nichol)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The vachel botanize the darb. The vachel prate the davide. The davide pedal the darb. The davide is cheesy. The davide botanize the darb. The darb pedal the davide. The darb pedal the tiffy. The darb is goofy. The darb is mechanical. The darb is shamanist. The darb botanize the davide. The darb botanize the tiffy. The darb prate the davide. The tiffy pedal the davide. The tiffy is goofy. The tiffy prate the davide. If something botanize the davide then the davide pedal the vachel. If something pedal the davide and the davide pedal the tiffy then the davide pedal the vachel. If the davide pedal the vachel then the vachel pedal the darb. If something is shamanist and it prate the vachel then it botanize the vachel. If something prate the vachel and it prate the tiffy then it botanize the tiffy. If something is mechanical and it botanize the davide then it prate the vachel. If something is bifilar and it prate the davide then the davide botanize the tiffy. If the davide botanize the vachel and the davide prate the darb then the vachel is cheesy. The vachel is bifilar.", "logic": "\nBotanize(vachel, darb)\nPrate(vachel, davide)\nPedal(davide, darb)\nCheesy(davide)\nBotanize(davide, darb)\nPedal(darb, davide)\nPedal(darb, tiffy)\nGoofy(darb)\nMechanical(darb)\nShamanist(darb)\nBotanize(darb, davide)\nBotanize(darb, tiffy)\nPrate(darb, davide)\nPedal(tiffy, davide)\nGoofy(tiffy)\nPrate(tiffy, davide)\nforall x (Botanize(x, davide) -> Pedal(davide, vachel))\nforall x (Pedal(x, davide) and Pedal(davide, tiffy) -> Pedal(davide, vachel))\nPedal(davide, vachel) -> Pedal(vachel, darb)\nforall x (Shamanist(x) and Prate(x, vachel) -> Botanize(x, vachel))\nforall x (Prate(x, vachel) and Prate(x, tiffy) -> Botanize(x, tiffy))\nforall x (Mechanical(x) and Botanize(x, davide) -> Prate(x, vachel))\nforall x (Bifilar(x) and Prate(x, davide) -> Botanize(davide, tiffy))\nBotanize(davide, vachel) and Prate(davide, darb) -> Cheesy(vachel)\n\nBifilar(vachel)\n\nBifilar(vachel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The fawnia urinate the flemming. The fawnia acclimate the hilton. The hilton litter the flemming. The hilton is thin. The hilton urinate the flemming. The flemming litter the hilton. The flemming litter the myrna. The flemming is sane. The flemming is puffed. The flemming is botryoid. The flemming urinate the hilton. The flemming urinate the myrna. The flemming acclimate the hilton. The myrna litter the hilton. The myrna is sane. The myrna acclimate the hilton. If something urinate the hilton then the hilton litter the fawnia. If something litter the hilton and the hilton litter the myrna then the hilton litter the fawnia. If the hilton litter the fawnia then the fawnia litter the flemming. If something is botryoid and it acclimate the fawnia then it urinate the fawnia. If something acclimate the fawnia and it acclimate the myrna then it urinate the myrna. If something is puffed and it urinate the hilton then it acclimate the fawnia. If something is systematic and it acclimate the hilton then the hilton urinate the myrna. If the hilton urinate the fawnia and the hilton acclimate the flemming then the fawnia is thin. The fawnia is not sane.", "logic": "\nUrinate(fawnia, flemming)\nAcclimate(fawnia, hilton)\nLitter(hilton, flemming)\nThin(hilton)\nUrinate(hilton, flemming)\nLitter(flemming, hilton)\nLitter(flemming, myrna)\nSane(flemming)\nPuffed(flemming)\nBotryoid(flemming)\nUrinate(flemming, hilton)\nUrinate(flemming, myrna)\nAcclimate(flemming, hilton)\nLitter(myrna, hilton)\nSane(myrna)\nAcclimate(myrna, hilton)\nforall x (Urinate(x, hilton) -> Litter(hilton, fawnia))\nforall x (Litter(x, hilton) and Litter(hilton, myrna) -> Litter(hilton, fawnia))\nLitter(hilton, fawnia) -> Litter(fawnia, flemming)\nforall x (Botryoid(x) and Acclimate(x, fawnia) -> Urinate(x, fawnia))\nforall x (Acclimate(x, fawnia) and Acclimate(x, myrna) -> Urinate(x, myrna))\nforall x (Puffed(x) and Urinate(x, hilton) -> Acclimate(x, fawnia))\nforall x (Systematic(x) and Acclimate(x, hilton) -> Urinate(hilton, myrna))\nUrinate(hilton, fawnia) and Acclimate(hilton, flemming) -> Thin(fawnia)\n\nnot Sane(fawnia)\n\nnot Sane(fawnia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "The alica transfix the tawsha. The alica buttonhole the zeb. The zeb paint the tawsha. The zeb is uncoupled. The zeb transfix the tawsha. The tawsha paint the zeb. The tawsha paint the edward. The tawsha is ritzy. The tawsha is broadleaf. The tawsha is thawed. The tawsha transfix the zeb. The tawsha transfix the edward. The tawsha buttonhole the zeb. The edward paint the zeb. The edward is ritzy. The edward buttonhole the zeb. If something transfix the zeb then the zeb paint the alica. If something paint the zeb and the zeb paint the edward then the zeb paint the alica. If the zeb paint the alica then the alica paint the tawsha. If something is thawed and it buttonhole the alica then it transfix the alica. If something buttonhole the alica and it buttonhole the edward then it transfix the edward. If something is broadleaf and it transfix the zeb then it buttonhole the alica. If something is upstairs and it buttonhole the zeb then the zeb transfix the edward. If the zeb transfix the alica and the zeb buttonhole the tawsha then the alica is uncoupled. The alica buttonhole the edward.", "logic": "\nTransfix(alica, tawsha)\nButtonhole(alica, zeb)\nPaint(zeb, tawsha)\nUncoupled(zeb)\nTransfix(zeb, tawsha)\nPaint(tawsha, zeb)\nPaint(tawsha, edward)\nRitzy(tawsha)\nBroadleaf(tawsha)\nThawed(tawsha)\nTransfix(tawsha, zeb)\nTransfix(tawsha, edward)\nButtonhole(tawsha, zeb)\nPaint(edward, zeb)\nRitzy(edward)\nButtonhole(edward, zeb)\nforall x (Transfix(x, zeb) -> Paint(zeb, alica))\nforall x (Paint(x, zeb) and Paint(zeb, edward) -> Paint(zeb, alica))\nPaint(zeb, alica) -> Paint(alica, tawsha)\nforall x (Thawed(x) and Buttonhole(x, alica) -> Transfix(x, alica))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, alica) and Buttonhole(x, edward) -> Transfix(x, edward))\nforall x (Broadleaf(x) and Transfix(x, zeb) -> Buttonhole(x, alica))\nforall x (Upstairs(x) and Buttonhole(x, zeb) -> Transfix(zeb, edward))\nTransfix(zeb, alica) and Buttonhole(zeb, tawsha) -> Uncoupled(alica)\n\nButtonhole(alica, edward)\n\nButtonhole(alica, edward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-140"} {"premises": "Idette is unscalable. Eddy is deweyan. Casper is slack. Penny is shrewish. Cold people are shrewish. If Casper is submarine and Casper is slack then Casper is shrewish. If someone is shrewish then they are unscalable. If someone is slack then they are unscalable. All slack people are unscalable. If Idette is abridged then Idette is micropylar. Penny is shrewish.", "logic": "\nUnscalable(idette)\nDeweyan(eddy)\nSlack(casper)\nShrewish(penny)\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Shrewish(x))\nSubmarine(casper) and Slack(casper) -> Shrewish(casper)\nforall x (Shrewish(x) -> Unscalable(x))\nforall x (Slack(x) -> Unscalable(x))\nforall x (Slack(x) -> Unscalable(x))\nAbridged(idette) -> Micropylar(idette)\n\nShrewish(penny)\n\ntherefore Shrewish(penny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Ursa is cattish. Husain is chintzy. Kenn is outspoken. Lissy is accepted. Cold people are accepted. If Kenn is glottal and Kenn is outspoken then Kenn is accepted. If someone is accepted then they are cattish. If someone is outspoken then they are cattish. All outspoken people are cattish. If Ursa is prenatal then Ursa is akimbo. Lissy is not accepted.", "logic": "\nCattish(ursa)\nChintzy(husain)\nOutspoken(kenn)\nAccepted(lissy)\nforall x (Chintzy(x) -> Accepted(x))\nGlottal(kenn) and Outspoken(kenn) -> Accepted(kenn)\nforall x (Accepted(x) -> Cattish(x))\nforall x (Outspoken(x) -> Cattish(x))\nforall x (Outspoken(x) -> Cattish(x))\nPrenatal(ursa) -> Akimbo(ursa)\n\nnot Accepted(lissy)\n\ntherefore Accepted(lissy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Sheffield is driven. Isaiah is geothermal. Natalia is mute. Fania is divergent. Cold people are divergent. If Natalia is cognisable and Natalia is mute then Natalia is divergent. If someone is divergent then they are driven. If someone is mute then they are driven. All mute people are driven. If Sheffield is forced then Sheffield is fanged. Natalia is driven.", "logic": "\nDriven(sheffield)\nGeothermal(isaiah)\nMute(natalia)\nDivergent(fania)\nforall x (Geothermal(x) -> Divergent(x))\nCognisable(natalia) and Mute(natalia) -> Divergent(natalia)\nforall x (Divergent(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Mute(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Mute(x) -> Driven(x))\nForced(sheffield) -> Fanged(sheffield)\n\nDriven(natalia)\n\nMute(natalia) and forall x (Mute(x) -> Driven(x)) -> therefore Driven(natalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Aubry is hellenic. Selie is steady. Janice is augean. Thad is useless. Cold people are useless. If Janice is ghastly and Janice is augean then Janice is useless. If someone is useless then they are hellenic. If someone is augean then they are hellenic. All augean people are hellenic. If Aubry is clonic then Aubry is unhatched. Janice is not hellenic.", "logic": "\nHellenic(aubry)\nSteady(selie)\nAugean(janice)\nUseless(thad)\nforall x (Steady(x) -> Useless(x))\nGhastly(janice) and Augean(janice) -> Useless(janice)\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Hellenic(x))\nforall x (Augean(x) -> Hellenic(x))\nforall x (Augean(x) -> Hellenic(x))\nClonic(aubry) -> Unhatched(aubry)\n\nnot Hellenic(janice)\n\nAugean(janice) and forall x (Augean(x) -> Hellenic(x)) -> therefore Hellenic(janice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Lane is swingeing. Hope is arduous. Felita is zoic. Salim is bahamian. Cold people are bahamian. If Felita is lusterless and Felita is zoic then Felita is bahamian. If someone is bahamian then they are swingeing. If someone is zoic then they are swingeing. All zoic people are swingeing. If Lane is canicular then Lane is varying. Hope is swingeing.", "logic": "\nSwingeing(lane)\nArduous(hope)\nZoic(felita)\nBahamian(salim)\nforall x (Arduous(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nLusterless(felita) and Zoic(felita) -> Bahamian(felita)\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nCanicular(lane) -> Varying(lane)\n\nSwingeing(hope)\n\nArduous(hope) and forall x (Arduous(x) -> Bahamian(x)) -> therefore Bahamian(hope) Bahamian(hope) and forall x (Bahamian(x) -> Swingeing(x)) -> therefore Swingeing(hope)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Martie is marshy. Ignace is nazarene. Glori is deserving. Phaidra is bilabial. Cold people are bilabial. If Glori is silver and Glori is deserving then Glori is bilabial. If someone is bilabial then they are marshy. If someone is deserving then they are marshy. All deserving people are marshy. If Martie is cloze then Martie is unstinted. Ignace is not marshy.", "logic": "\nMarshy(martie)\nNazarene(ignace)\nDeserving(glori)\nBilabial(phaidra)\nforall x (Nazarene(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nSilver(glori) and Deserving(glori) -> Bilabial(glori)\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Marshy(x))\nCloze(martie) -> Unstinted(martie)\n\nnot Marshy(ignace)\n\nNazarene(ignace) and forall x (Nazarene(x) -> Bilabial(x)) -> therefore Bilabial(ignace) Bilabial(ignace) and forall x (Bilabial(x) -> Marshy(x)) -> therefore Marshy(ignace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Sandie is compressed. Gerhardt is vibrionic. Otes is neglectful. Tomlin is enough. Cold people are enough. If Otes is fattened and Otes is neglectful then Otes is enough. If someone is enough then they are compressed. If someone is neglectful then they are compressed. All neglectful people are compressed. If Sandie is methylated then Sandie is torturous. Otes is not enough.", "logic": "\nCompressed(sandie)\nVibrionic(gerhardt)\nNeglectful(otes)\nEnough(tomlin)\nforall x (Vibrionic(x) -> Enough(x))\nFattened(otes) and Neglectful(otes) -> Enough(otes)\nforall x (Enough(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Neglectful(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Neglectful(x) -> Compressed(x))\nMethylated(sandie) -> Torturous(sandie)\n\nnot Enough(otes)\n\nforall x (Vibrionic(x) -> Enough(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Vivi is ablative. Adrea is auroral. Frans is cadaveric. Osbert is vacuolate. Cold people are vacuolate. If Frans is unwritten and Frans is cadaveric then Frans is vacuolate. If someone is vacuolate then they are ablative. If someone is cadaveric then they are ablative. All cadaveric people are ablative. If Vivi is quotable then Vivi is supperless. Vivi is vacuolate.", "logic": "\nAblative(vivi)\nAuroral(adrea)\nCadaveric(frans)\nVacuolate(osbert)\nforall x (Auroral(x) -> Vacuolate(x))\nUnwritten(frans) and Cadaveric(frans) -> Vacuolate(frans)\nforall x (Vacuolate(x) -> Ablative(x))\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) -> Ablative(x))\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) -> Ablative(x))\nQuotable(vivi) -> Supperless(vivi)\n\nVacuolate(vivi)\n\nforall x (Auroral(x) -> Vacuolate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Arnoldo is inland. Mikhail is fringed. Ninnetta is combined. Montague is dulled. Cold people are dulled. If Ninnetta is spellbound and Ninnetta is combined then Ninnetta is dulled. If someone is dulled then they are inland. If someone is combined then they are inland. All combined people are inland. If Arnoldo is sudanese then Arnoldo is hemal. Arnoldo is not hemal.", "logic": "\nInland(arnoldo)\nFringed(mikhail)\nCombined(ninnetta)\nDulled(montague)\nforall x (Fringed(x) -> Dulled(x))\nSpellbound(ninnetta) and Combined(ninnetta) -> Dulled(ninnetta)\nforall x (Dulled(x) -> Inland(x))\nforall x (Combined(x) -> Inland(x))\nforall x (Combined(x) -> Inland(x))\nSudanese(arnoldo) -> Hemal(arnoldo)\n\nnot Hemal(arnoldo)\n\nSudanese(arnoldo) -> Hemal(arnoldo) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Chariot is ferny. Theodoric is redux. Hildy is freehanded. Damita is pouched. Cold people are pouched. If Hildy is hardheaded and Hildy is freehanded then Hildy is pouched. If someone is pouched then they are ferny. If someone is freehanded then they are ferny. All freehanded people are ferny. If Chariot is dodgy then Chariot is turbulent. Hildy is dodgy.", "logic": "\nFerny(chariot)\nRedux(theodoric)\nFreehanded(hildy)\nPouched(damita)\nforall x (Redux(x) -> Pouched(x))\nHardheaded(hildy) and Freehanded(hildy) -> Pouched(hildy)\nforall x (Pouched(x) -> Ferny(x))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Ferny(x))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Ferny(x))\nDodgy(chariot) -> Turbulent(chariot)\n\nDodgy(hildy)\n\nDodgy(hildy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Jana is whitened. Nona is polygonal. Abbi is shipshape. Francesco is submerged. Cold people are submerged. If Abbi is sliced and Abbi is shipshape then Abbi is submerged. If someone is submerged then they are whitened. If someone is shipshape then they are whitened. All shipshape people are whitened. If Jana is veterinary then Jana is curving. Abbi is not curving.", "logic": "\nWhitened(jana)\nPolygonal(nona)\nShipshape(abbi)\nSubmerged(francesco)\nforall x (Polygonal(x) -> Submerged(x))\nSliced(abbi) and Shipshape(abbi) -> Submerged(abbi)\nforall x (Submerged(x) -> Whitened(x))\nforall x (Shipshape(x) -> Whitened(x))\nforall x (Shipshape(x) -> Whitened(x))\nVeterinary(jana) -> Curving(jana)\n\nnot Curving(abbi)\n\nnot Curving(abbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "Susana is benighted. Welby is noncurrent. Ezra is sublimate. Carli is slav. Cold people are slav. If Ezra is irenic and Ezra is sublimate then Ezra is slav. If someone is slav then they are benighted. If someone is sublimate then they are benighted. All sublimate people are benighted. If Susana is paschal then Susana is fascinated. Susana is irenic.", "logic": "\nBenighted(susana)\nNoncurrent(welby)\nSublimate(ezra)\nSlav(carli)\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) -> Slav(x))\nIrenic(ezra) and Sublimate(ezra) -> Slav(ezra)\nforall x (Slav(x) -> Benighted(x))\nforall x (Sublimate(x) -> Benighted(x))\nforall x (Sublimate(x) -> Benighted(x))\nPaschal(susana) -> Fascinated(susana)\n\nIrenic(susana)\n\nIrenic(susana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1262"} {"premises": "The suzie is unchained. The suzie is prisonlike. The suzie is undepicted. The suzie is undefiled. The suzie is unsaid. The suzie environ the vasily. The suzie honk the vasily. The suzie mature the vasily. The vasily is unchained. The vasily is prisonlike. The vasily is undepicted. The vasily is undefiled. The vasily is unsaid. The vasily environ the suzie. The vasily honk the suzie. The vasily mature the suzie. If something environ the vasily then the vasily mature the suzie. If something mature the suzie then it environ the suzie. If something mature the vasily then it mature the suzie. The vasily is unsaid.", "logic": "\nUnchained(suzie)\nPrisonlike(suzie)\nUndepicted(suzie)\nUndefiled(suzie)\nUnsaid(suzie)\nEnviron(suzie, vasily)\nHonk(suzie, vasily)\nMature(suzie, vasily)\nUnchained(vasily)\nPrisonlike(vasily)\nUndepicted(vasily)\nUndefiled(vasily)\nUnsaid(vasily)\nEnviron(vasily, suzie)\nHonk(vasily, suzie)\nMature(vasily, suzie)\nforall x (Environ(x, vasily) -> Mature(vasily, suzie))\nforall x (Mature(x, suzie) -> Environ(x, suzie))\nforall x (Mature(x, vasily) -> Mature(x, suzie))\n\nUnsaid(vasily)\n\ntherefore Unsaid(vasily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The dell is seaworthy. The dell is tenebrific. The dell is cockamamy. The dell is tangerine. The dell is marbled. The dell suffix the elianora. The dell fuel the elianora. The dell mothproof the elianora. The elianora is seaworthy. The elianora is tenebrific. The elianora is cockamamy. The elianora is tangerine. The elianora is marbled. The elianora suffix the dell. The elianora fuel the dell. The elianora mothproof the dell. If something suffix the elianora then the elianora mothproof the dell. If something mothproof the dell then it suffix the dell. If something mothproof the elianora then it mothproof the dell. The dell is not tangerine.", "logic": "\nSeaworthy(dell)\nTenebrific(dell)\nCockamamy(dell)\nTangerine(dell)\nMarbled(dell)\nSuffix(dell, elianora)\nFuel(dell, elianora)\nMothproof(dell, elianora)\nSeaworthy(elianora)\nTenebrific(elianora)\nCockamamy(elianora)\nTangerine(elianora)\nMarbled(elianora)\nSuffix(elianora, dell)\nFuel(elianora, dell)\nMothproof(elianora, dell)\nforall x (Suffix(x, elianora) -> Mothproof(elianora, dell))\nforall x (Mothproof(x, dell) -> Suffix(x, dell))\nforall x (Mothproof(x, elianora) -> Mothproof(x, dell))\n\nnot Tangerine(dell)\n\ntherefore Tangerine(dell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The sheeree is wayward. The sheeree is convulsive. The sheeree is heartening. The sheeree is magnetic. The sheeree is osteal. The sheeree upset the spenser. The sheeree hinder the spenser. The sheeree oscillate the spenser. The spenser is wayward. The spenser is convulsive. The spenser is heartening. The spenser is magnetic. The spenser is osteal. The spenser upset the sheeree. The spenser hinder the sheeree. The spenser oscillate the sheeree. If something upset the spenser then the spenser oscillate the sheeree. If something oscillate the sheeree then it upset the sheeree. If something oscillate the spenser then it oscillate the sheeree. The sheeree oscillate the sheeree.", "logic": "\nWayward(sheeree)\nConvulsive(sheeree)\nHeartening(sheeree)\nMagnetic(sheeree)\nOsteal(sheeree)\nUpset(sheeree, spenser)\nHinder(sheeree, spenser)\nOscillate(sheeree, spenser)\nWayward(spenser)\nConvulsive(spenser)\nHeartening(spenser)\nMagnetic(spenser)\nOsteal(spenser)\nUpset(spenser, sheeree)\nHinder(spenser, sheeree)\nOscillate(spenser, sheeree)\nforall x (Upset(x, spenser) -> Oscillate(spenser, sheeree))\nforall x (Oscillate(x, sheeree) -> Upset(x, sheeree))\nforall x (Oscillate(x, spenser) -> Oscillate(x, sheeree))\n\nOscillate(sheeree, sheeree)\n\nOscillate(sheeree, spenser) and forall x (Oscillate(x, spenser) -> Oscillate(x, sheeree)) -> therefore Oscillate(sheeree, sheeree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The nannie is received. The nannie is allergic. The nannie is scoreless. The nannie is coupled. The nannie is vocal. The nannie handicap the merralee. The nannie podcast the merralee. The nannie bonnet the merralee. The merralee is received. The merralee is allergic. The merralee is scoreless. The merralee is coupled. The merralee is vocal. The merralee handicap the nannie. The merralee podcast the nannie. The merralee bonnet the nannie. If something handicap the merralee then the merralee bonnet the nannie. If something bonnet the nannie then it handicap the nannie. If something bonnet the merralee then it bonnet the nannie. The nannie does not visit the nannie.", "logic": "\nReceived(nannie)\nAllergic(nannie)\nScoreless(nannie)\nCoupled(nannie)\nVocal(nannie)\nHandicap(nannie, merralee)\nPodcast(nannie, merralee)\nBonnet(nannie, merralee)\nReceived(merralee)\nAllergic(merralee)\nScoreless(merralee)\nCoupled(merralee)\nVocal(merralee)\nHandicap(merralee, nannie)\nPodcast(merralee, nannie)\nBonnet(merralee, nannie)\nforall x (Handicap(x, merralee) -> Bonnet(merralee, nannie))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, nannie) -> Handicap(x, nannie))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, merralee) -> Bonnet(x, nannie))\n\nnot Bonnet(nannie, nannie)\n\nBonnet(nannie, merralee) and forall x (Bonnet(x, merralee) -> Bonnet(x, nannie)) -> therefore Bonnet(nannie, nannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The juline is brooding. The juline is newborn. The juline is planar. The juline is disgusted. The juline is romish. The juline preordain the corena. The juline ejaculate the corena. The juline stenograph the corena. The corena is brooding. The corena is newborn. The corena is planar. The corena is disgusted. The corena is romish. The corena preordain the juline. The corena ejaculate the juline. The corena stenograph the juline. If something preordain the corena then the corena stenograph the juline. If something stenograph the juline then it preordain the juline. If something stenograph the corena then it stenograph the juline. The juline preordain the juline.", "logic": "\nBrooding(juline)\nNewborn(juline)\nPlanar(juline)\nDisgusted(juline)\nRomish(juline)\nPreordain(juline, corena)\nEjaculate(juline, corena)\nStenograph(juline, corena)\nBrooding(corena)\nNewborn(corena)\nPlanar(corena)\nDisgusted(corena)\nRomish(corena)\nPreordain(corena, juline)\nEjaculate(corena, juline)\nStenograph(corena, juline)\nforall x (Preordain(x, corena) -> Stenograph(corena, juline))\nforall x (Stenograph(x, juline) -> Preordain(x, juline))\nforall x (Stenograph(x, corena) -> Stenograph(x, juline))\n\nPreordain(juline, juline)\n\nStenograph(juline, corena) and forall x (Stenograph(x, corena) -> Stenograph(x, juline)) -> therefore Stenograph(juline, juline) Stenograph(juline, juline) and forall x (Stenograph(x, juline) -> Preordain(x, juline)) -> therefore Preordain(juline, juline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The doris is bacchic. The doris is jawless. The doris is vocalic. The doris is delusory. The doris is polemical. The doris surge the tallia. The doris utilize the tallia. The doris misgovern the tallia. The tallia is bacchic. The tallia is jawless. The tallia is vocalic. The tallia is delusory. The tallia is polemical. The tallia surge the doris. The tallia utilize the doris. The tallia misgovern the doris. If something surge the tallia then the tallia misgovern the doris. If something misgovern the doris then it surge the doris. If something misgovern the tallia then it misgovern the doris. The doris does not like the doris.", "logic": "\nBacchic(doris)\nJawless(doris)\nVocalic(doris)\nDelusory(doris)\nPolemical(doris)\nSurge(doris, tallia)\nUtilize(doris, tallia)\nMisgovern(doris, tallia)\nBacchic(tallia)\nJawless(tallia)\nVocalic(tallia)\nDelusory(tallia)\nPolemical(tallia)\nSurge(tallia, doris)\nUtilize(tallia, doris)\nMisgovern(tallia, doris)\nforall x (Surge(x, tallia) -> Misgovern(tallia, doris))\nforall x (Misgovern(x, doris) -> Surge(x, doris))\nforall x (Misgovern(x, tallia) -> Misgovern(x, doris))\n\nnot Surge(doris, doris)\n\nMisgovern(doris, tallia) and forall x (Misgovern(x, tallia) -> Misgovern(x, doris)) -> therefore Misgovern(doris, doris) Misgovern(doris, doris) and forall x (Misgovern(x, doris) -> Surge(x, doris)) -> therefore Surge(doris, doris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The tillie is franciscan. The tillie is frowzled. The tillie is rattling. The tillie is bondable. The tillie is negligent. The tillie dilate the ainsley. The tillie depress the ainsley. The tillie chill the ainsley. The ainsley is franciscan. The ainsley is frowzled. The ainsley is rattling. The ainsley is bondable. The ainsley is negligent. The ainsley dilate the tillie. The ainsley depress the tillie. The ainsley chill the tillie. If something dilate the ainsley then the ainsley chill the tillie. If something chill the tillie then it dilate the tillie. If something chill the ainsley then it chill the tillie. The ainsley does not like the ainsley.", "logic": "\nFranciscan(tillie)\nFrowzled(tillie)\nRattling(tillie)\nBondable(tillie)\nNegligent(tillie)\nDilate(tillie, ainsley)\nDepress(tillie, ainsley)\nChill(tillie, ainsley)\nFranciscan(ainsley)\nFrowzled(ainsley)\nRattling(ainsley)\nBondable(ainsley)\nNegligent(ainsley)\nDilate(ainsley, tillie)\nDepress(ainsley, tillie)\nChill(ainsley, tillie)\nforall x (Dilate(x, ainsley) -> Chill(ainsley, tillie))\nforall x (Chill(x, tillie) -> Dilate(x, tillie))\nforall x (Chill(x, ainsley) -> Chill(x, tillie))\n\nnot Dilate(ainsley, ainsley)\n\nnot Dilate(ainsley, ainsley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The jonathon is geophytic. The jonathon is melancholy. The jonathon is bivalved. The jonathon is ergotropic. The jonathon is obscure. The jonathon toady the rosa. The jonathon shoot the rosa. The jonathon kibitz the rosa. The rosa is geophytic. The rosa is melancholy. The rosa is bivalved. The rosa is ergotropic. The rosa is obscure. The rosa toady the jonathon. The rosa shoot the jonathon. The rosa kibitz the jonathon. If something toady the rosa then the rosa kibitz the jonathon. If something kibitz the jonathon then it toady the jonathon. If something kibitz the rosa then it kibitz the jonathon. The rosa shoot the rosa.", "logic": "\nGeophytic(jonathon)\nMelancholy(jonathon)\nBivalved(jonathon)\nErgotropic(jonathon)\nObscure(jonathon)\nToady(jonathon, rosa)\nShoot(jonathon, rosa)\nKibitz(jonathon, rosa)\nGeophytic(rosa)\nMelancholy(rosa)\nBivalved(rosa)\nErgotropic(rosa)\nObscure(rosa)\nToady(rosa, jonathon)\nShoot(rosa, jonathon)\nKibitz(rosa, jonathon)\nforall x (Toady(x, rosa) -> Kibitz(rosa, jonathon))\nforall x (Kibitz(x, jonathon) -> Toady(x, jonathon))\nforall x (Kibitz(x, rosa) -> Kibitz(x, jonathon))\n\nShoot(rosa, rosa)\n\nShoot(rosa, rosa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The daria is drawn. The daria is private. The daria is agrypnotic. The daria is lucullan. The daria is spiderlike. The daria exsiccate the flinn. The daria vaunt the flinn. The daria squeeze the flinn. The flinn is drawn. The flinn is private. The flinn is agrypnotic. The flinn is lucullan. The flinn is spiderlike. The flinn exsiccate the daria. The flinn vaunt the daria. The flinn squeeze the daria. If something exsiccate the flinn then the flinn squeeze the daria. If something squeeze the daria then it exsiccate the daria. If something squeeze the flinn then it squeeze the daria. The flinn does not visit the flinn.", "logic": "\nDrawn(daria)\nPrivate(daria)\nAgrypnotic(daria)\nLucullan(daria)\nSpiderlike(daria)\nExsiccate(daria, flinn)\nVaunt(daria, flinn)\nSqueeze(daria, flinn)\nDrawn(flinn)\nPrivate(flinn)\nAgrypnotic(flinn)\nLucullan(flinn)\nSpiderlike(flinn)\nExsiccate(flinn, daria)\nVaunt(flinn, daria)\nSqueeze(flinn, daria)\nforall x (Exsiccate(x, flinn) -> Squeeze(flinn, daria))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, daria) -> Exsiccate(x, daria))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, flinn) -> Squeeze(x, daria))\n\nnot Squeeze(flinn, flinn)\n\nnot Squeeze(flinn, flinn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "The christean is wily. The christean is stated. The christean is leguminous. The christean is bantering. The christean is muhammadan. The christean totalize the jack. The christean minimise the jack. The christean baptize the jack. The jack is wily. The jack is stated. The jack is leguminous. The jack is bantering. The jack is muhammadan. The jack totalize the christean. The jack minimise the christean. The jack baptize the christean. If something totalize the jack then the jack baptize the christean. If something baptize the christean then it totalize the christean. If something baptize the jack then it baptize the christean. The christean minimise the christean.", "logic": "\nWily(christean)\nStated(christean)\nLeguminous(christean)\nBantering(christean)\nMuhammadan(christean)\nTotalize(christean, jack)\nMinimise(christean, jack)\nBaptize(christean, jack)\nWily(jack)\nStated(jack)\nLeguminous(jack)\nBantering(jack)\nMuhammadan(jack)\nTotalize(jack, christean)\nMinimise(jack, christean)\nBaptize(jack, christean)\nforall x (Totalize(x, jack) -> Baptize(jack, christean))\nforall x (Baptize(x, christean) -> Totalize(x, christean))\nforall x (Baptize(x, jack) -> Baptize(x, christean))\n\nMinimise(christean, christean)\n\nMinimise(christean, christean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-500"} {"premises": "Ethel is ulcerous. Ranna is diverted. Kattie is diverted. Nice things are untrimmed. If something is diverted then it is untrimmed. If something is untrimmed then it is edentate. All diverted things are braless. All untrimmed, ulcerous things are edentate. All ulcerous, edentate things are untrimmed. All unfenced things are untrimmed. If Kattie is indigenous then Kattie is diverted. Ranna is diverted.", "logic": "\nUlcerous(ethel)\nDiverted(ranna)\nDiverted(kattie)\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nforall x (Untrimmed(x) -> Edentate(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Braless(x))\nforall x (Untrimmed(x) and Ulcerous(x) -> Edentate(x))\nforall x (Ulcerous(x) and Edentate(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nforall x (Unfenced(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nIndigenous(kattie) -> Diverted(kattie)\n\nDiverted(ranna)\n\ntherefore Diverted(ranna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Krissy is anaerobic. Ingeborg is prepacked. Marcile is prepacked. Nice things are under. If something is prepacked then it is under. If something is under then it is away. All prepacked things are tripartite. All under, anaerobic things are away. All anaerobic, away things are under. All plaguey things are under. If Marcile is warning then Marcile is prepacked. Ingeborg is not prepacked.", "logic": "\nAnaerobic(krissy)\nPrepacked(ingeborg)\nPrepacked(marcile)\nforall x (Prepacked(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Prepacked(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Under(x) -> Away(x))\nforall x (Prepacked(x) -> Tripartite(x))\nforall x (Under(x) and Anaerobic(x) -> Away(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) and Away(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) -> Under(x))\nWarning(marcile) -> Prepacked(marcile)\n\nnot Prepacked(ingeborg)\n\ntherefore Prepacked(ingeborg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Skye is offstage. Chloe is genital. Herby is genital. Nice things are acidic. If something is genital then it is acidic. If something is acidic then it is unpointed. All genital things are cosy. All acidic, offstage things are unpointed. All offstage, unpointed things are acidic. All shiny things are acidic. If Herby is uncarpeted then Herby is genital. Herby is acidic.", "logic": "\nOffstage(skye)\nGenital(chloe)\nGenital(herby)\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Cosy(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) and Offstage(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Offstage(x) and Unpointed(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Shiny(x) -> Acidic(x))\nUncarpeted(herby) -> Genital(herby)\n\nAcidic(herby)\n\nGenital(herby) and forall x (Genital(x) -> Acidic(x)) -> therefore Acidic(herby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Nunzio is awesome. Albrecht is unrelieved. Carmela is unrelieved. Nice things are foster. If something is unrelieved then it is foster. If something is foster then it is untitled. All unrelieved things are heartfelt. All foster, awesome things are untitled. All awesome, untitled things are foster. All browned things are foster. If Carmela is handled then Carmela is unrelieved. Carmela is not heartfelt.", "logic": "\nAwesome(nunzio)\nUnrelieved(albrecht)\nUnrelieved(carmela)\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) -> Untitled(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) and Awesome(x) -> Untitled(x))\nforall x (Awesome(x) and Untitled(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Browned(x) -> Foster(x))\nHandled(carmela) -> Unrelieved(carmela)\n\nnot Heartfelt(carmela)\n\nUnrelieved(carmela) and forall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Heartfelt(x)) -> therefore Heartfelt(carmela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Sayres is floored. Thaddius is stylised. Carmon is stylised. Nice things are cephalopod. If something is stylised then it is cephalopod. If something is cephalopod then it is unrimed. All stylised things are pimply. All cephalopod, floored things are unrimed. All floored, unrimed things are cephalopod. All unfailing things are cephalopod. If Carmon is proximate then Carmon is stylised. Carmon is unrimed.", "logic": "\nFloored(sayres)\nStylised(thaddius)\nStylised(carmon)\nforall x (Stylised(x) -> Cephalopod(x))\nforall x (Stylised(x) -> Cephalopod(x))\nforall x (Cephalopod(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nforall x (Stylised(x) -> Pimply(x))\nforall x (Cephalopod(x) and Floored(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) and Unrimed(x) -> Cephalopod(x))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) -> Cephalopod(x))\nProximate(carmon) -> Stylised(carmon)\n\nUnrimed(carmon)\n\nStylised(carmon) and forall x (Stylised(x) -> Cephalopod(x)) -> therefore Cephalopod(carmon) Cephalopod(carmon) and forall x (Cephalopod(x) -> Unrimed(x)) -> therefore Unrimed(carmon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Antone is hollow. Bartolemo is conclusive. Tomlin is conclusive. Nice things are czarist. If something is conclusive then it is czarist. If something is czarist then it is septate. All conclusive things are possessed. All czarist, hollow things are septate. All hollow, septate things are czarist. All adnate things are czarist. If Tomlin is worsened then Tomlin is conclusive. Tomlin is not septate.", "logic": "\nHollow(antone)\nConclusive(bartolemo)\nConclusive(tomlin)\nforall x (Conclusive(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Conclusive(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Czarist(x) -> Septate(x))\nforall x (Conclusive(x) -> Possessed(x))\nforall x (Czarist(x) and Hollow(x) -> Septate(x))\nforall x (Hollow(x) and Septate(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Adnate(x) -> Czarist(x))\nWorsened(tomlin) -> Conclusive(tomlin)\n\nnot Septate(tomlin)\n\nConclusive(tomlin) and forall x (Conclusive(x) -> Czarist(x)) -> therefore Czarist(tomlin) Czarist(tomlin) and forall x (Czarist(x) -> Septate(x)) -> therefore Septate(tomlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Jenelle is actable. Freddy is asat. Daffy is asat. Nice things are baseborn. If something is asat then it is baseborn. If something is baseborn then it is five. All asat things are overnice. All baseborn, actable things are five. All actable, five things are baseborn. All nonfissile things are baseborn. If Daffy is mousey then Daffy is asat. Jenelle is not overnice.", "logic": "\nActable(jenelle)\nAsat(freddy)\nAsat(daffy)\nforall x (Asat(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Baseborn(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) -> Overnice(x))\nforall x (Baseborn(x) and Actable(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Actable(x) and Five(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nMousey(daffy) -> Asat(daffy)\n\nnot Overnice(jenelle)\n\nforall x (Asat(x) -> Overnice(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Harcourt is unshackled. Diahann is trepid. Chrysler is trepid. Nice things are loverlike. If something is trepid then it is loverlike. If something is loverlike then it is darkish. All trepid things are anoxic. All loverlike, unshackled things are darkish. All unshackled, darkish things are loverlike. All diffuse things are loverlike. If Chrysler is sighted then Chrysler is trepid. Harcourt is darkish.", "logic": "\nUnshackled(harcourt)\nTrepid(diahann)\nTrepid(chrysler)\nforall x (Trepid(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Trepid(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Darkish(x))\nforall x (Trepid(x) -> Anoxic(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and Unshackled(x) -> Darkish(x))\nforall x (Unshackled(x) and Darkish(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Diffuse(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nSighted(chrysler) -> Trepid(chrysler)\n\nDarkish(harcourt)\n\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Darkish(x)) <- forall x (Unshackled(x) and Darkish(x) -> Loverlike(x)) <- forall x (Loverlike(x) and Unshackled(x) -> Darkish(x)) <- forall x (Trepid(x) -> Loverlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Andrew is factious. Stirling is lordly. Gregg is lordly. Nice things are wartlike. If something is lordly then it is wartlike. If something is wartlike then it is caecal. All lordly things are mesmerised. All wartlike, factious things are caecal. All factious, caecal things are wartlike. All intruding things are wartlike. If Gregg is sudanese then Gregg is lordly. Andrew is not wartlike.", "logic": "\nFactious(andrew)\nLordly(stirling)\nLordly(gregg)\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) and Factious(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Factious(x) and Caecal(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Intruding(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nSudanese(gregg) -> Lordly(gregg)\n\nnot Wartlike(andrew)\n\nforall x (Factious(x) and Caecal(x) -> Wartlike(x)) <- forall x (Wartlike(x) -> Caecal(x)) <- forall x (Lordly(x) -> Wartlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Rebekkah is shoed. Abagael is volitional. Carena is volitional. Nice things are arithmetic. If something is volitional then it is arithmetic. If something is arithmetic then it is talentless. All volitional things are pale. All arithmetic, shoed things are talentless. All shoed, talentless things are arithmetic. All inherited things are arithmetic. If Carena is useable then Carena is volitional. Rebekkah is useable.", "logic": "\nShoed(rebekkah)\nVolitional(abagael)\nVolitional(carena)\nforall x (Volitional(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Volitional(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Talentless(x))\nforall x (Volitional(x) -> Pale(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) and Shoed(x) -> Talentless(x))\nforall x (Shoed(x) and Talentless(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Inherited(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nUseable(carena) -> Volitional(carena)\n\nUseable(rebekkah)\n\nUseable(rebekkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Baldwin is chance. Mateo is bullheaded. Valry is bullheaded. Nice things are formalised. If something is bullheaded then it is formalised. If something is formalised then it is trophic. All bullheaded things are notched. All formalised, chance things are trophic. All chance, trophic things are formalised. All saxicoline things are formalised. If Valry is newtonian then Valry is bullheaded. Mateo is not saxicoline.", "logic": "\nChance(baldwin)\nBullheaded(mateo)\nBullheaded(valry)\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) -> Trophic(x))\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) and Chance(x) -> Trophic(x))\nforall x (Chance(x) and Trophic(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Formalised(x))\nNewtonian(valry) -> Bullheaded(valry)\n\nnot Saxicoline(mateo)\n\nnot Saxicoline(mateo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "Sydelle is premarital. Aubree is lxxiii. Skipp is lxxiii. Nice things are battleful. If something is lxxiii then it is battleful. If something is battleful then it is sweetish. All lxxiii things are obvious. All battleful, premarital things are sweetish. All premarital, sweetish things are battleful. All mandibular things are battleful. If Skipp is rear then Skipp is lxxiii. Aubree is premarital.", "logic": "\nPremarital(sydelle)\nLxxiii(aubree)\nLxxiii(skipp)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Battleful(x))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Battleful(x))\nforall x (Battleful(x) -> Sweetish(x))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Battleful(x) and Premarital(x) -> Sweetish(x))\nforall x (Premarital(x) and Sweetish(x) -> Battleful(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Battleful(x))\nRear(skipp) -> Lxxiii(skipp)\n\nPremarital(aubree)\n\nPremarital(aubree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2406"} {"premises": "The tony is nationwide. The clifford is beakless. If the tony denote the clifford then the clifford ancylose the tony. If something denote the clifford then it costume the clifford. If something costume the clifford then it is beakless. If something is beakless then it denote the clifford. If something is nationwide and it denote the clifford then the clifford ancylose the tony. If something is desolate then it is beakless. The tony is nationwide.", "logic": "\nNationwide(tony)\nBeakless(clifford)\nDenote(tony, clifford) -> Ancylose(clifford, tony)\nforall x (Denote(x, clifford) -> Costume(x, clifford))\nforall x (Costume(x, clifford) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Beakless(x) -> Denote(x, clifford))\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and Denote(x, clifford) -> Ancylose(clifford, tony))\nforall x (Desolate(x) -> Beakless(x))\n\nNationwide(tony)\n\ntherefore Nationwide(tony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The charisse is apophyseal. The thornie is after. If the charisse extrude the thornie then the thornie surfeit the charisse. If something extrude the thornie then it marble the thornie. If something marble the thornie then it is after. If something is after then it extrude the thornie. If something is apophyseal and it extrude the thornie then the thornie surfeit the charisse. If something is northward then it is after. The charisse is not apophyseal.", "logic": "\nApophyseal(charisse)\nAfter(thornie)\nExtrude(charisse, thornie) -> Surfeit(thornie, charisse)\nforall x (Extrude(x, thornie) -> Marble(x, thornie))\nforall x (Marble(x, thornie) -> After(x))\nforall x (After(x) -> Extrude(x, thornie))\nforall x (Apophyseal(x) and Extrude(x, thornie) -> Surfeit(thornie, charisse))\nforall x (Northward(x) -> After(x))\n\nnot Apophyseal(charisse)\n\ntherefore Apophyseal(charisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The rena is hurtful. The genvieve is sanitised. If the rena pillage the genvieve then the genvieve spearhead the rena. If something pillage the genvieve then it buttweld the genvieve. If something buttweld the genvieve then it is sanitised. If something is sanitised then it pillage the genvieve. If something is hurtful and it pillage the genvieve then the genvieve spearhead the rena. If something is bloodshot then it is sanitised. The genvieve pillage the genvieve.", "logic": "\nHurtful(rena)\nSanitised(genvieve)\nPillage(rena, genvieve) -> Spearhead(genvieve, rena)\nforall x (Pillage(x, genvieve) -> Buttweld(x, genvieve))\nforall x (Buttweld(x, genvieve) -> Sanitised(x))\nforall x (Sanitised(x) -> Pillage(x, genvieve))\nforall x (Hurtful(x) and Pillage(x, genvieve) -> Spearhead(genvieve, rena))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Sanitised(x))\n\nPillage(genvieve, genvieve)\n\nSanitised(genvieve) and forall x (Sanitised(x) -> Pillage(x, genvieve)) -> therefore Pillage(genvieve, genvieve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The ekaterina is greenhouse. The mick is staple. If the ekaterina outperform the mick then the mick hibernate the ekaterina. If something outperform the mick then it hasten the mick. If something hasten the mick then it is staple. If something is staple then it outperform the mick. If something is greenhouse and it outperform the mick then the mick hibernate the ekaterina. If something is unbleached then it is staple. The mick does not eat the mick.", "logic": "\nGreenhouse(ekaterina)\nStaple(mick)\nOutperform(ekaterina, mick) -> Hibernate(mick, ekaterina)\nforall x (Outperform(x, mick) -> Hasten(x, mick))\nforall x (Hasten(x, mick) -> Staple(x))\nforall x (Staple(x) -> Outperform(x, mick))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) and Outperform(x, mick) -> Hibernate(mick, ekaterina))\nforall x (Unbleached(x) -> Staple(x))\n\nnot Outperform(mick, mick)\n\nStaple(mick) and forall x (Staple(x) -> Outperform(x, mick)) -> therefore Outperform(mick, mick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The hynda is fitting. The shelly is adnate. If the hynda putrefy the shelly then the shelly gage the hynda. If something putrefy the shelly then it worry the shelly. If something worry the shelly then it is adnate. If something is adnate then it putrefy the shelly. If something is fitting and it putrefy the shelly then the shelly gage the hynda. If something is egotistic then it is adnate. The shelly worry the shelly.", "logic": "\nFitting(hynda)\nAdnate(shelly)\nPutrefy(hynda, shelly) -> Gage(shelly, hynda)\nforall x (Putrefy(x, shelly) -> Worry(x, shelly))\nforall x (Worry(x, shelly) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Adnate(x) -> Putrefy(x, shelly))\nforall x (Fitting(x) and Putrefy(x, shelly) -> Gage(shelly, hynda))\nforall x (Egotistic(x) -> Adnate(x))\n\nWorry(shelly, shelly)\n\nAdnate(shelly) and forall x (Adnate(x) -> Putrefy(x, shelly)) -> therefore Putrefy(shelly, shelly) Putrefy(shelly, shelly) and forall x (Putrefy(x, shelly) -> Worry(x, shelly)) -> therefore Worry(shelly, shelly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The charmian is unpainful. The helene is orgiastic. If the charmian corrugate the helene then the helene valet the charmian. If something corrugate the helene then it whap the helene. If something whap the helene then it is orgiastic. If something is orgiastic then it corrugate the helene. If something is unpainful and it corrugate the helene then the helene valet the charmian. If something is guardant then it is orgiastic. The helene does not chase the helene.", "logic": "\nUnpainful(charmian)\nOrgiastic(helene)\nCorrugate(charmian, helene) -> Valet(helene, charmian)\nforall x (Corrugate(x, helene) -> Whap(x, helene))\nforall x (Whap(x, helene) -> Orgiastic(x))\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Corrugate(x, helene))\nforall x (Unpainful(x) and Corrugate(x, helene) -> Valet(helene, charmian))\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Orgiastic(x))\n\nnot Whap(helene, helene)\n\nOrgiastic(helene) and forall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Corrugate(x, helene)) -> therefore Corrugate(helene, helene) Corrugate(helene, helene) and forall x (Corrugate(x, helene) -> Whap(x, helene)) -> therefore Whap(helene, helene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The gaylene is liquified. The milt is nonpublic. If the gaylene swallow the milt then the milt vomit the gaylene. If something swallow the milt then it camphorate the milt. If something camphorate the milt then it is nonpublic. If something is nonpublic then it swallow the milt. If something is liquified and it swallow the milt then the milt vomit the gaylene. If something is incurious then it is nonpublic. The milt does not need the gaylene.", "logic": "\nLiquified(gaylene)\nNonpublic(milt)\nSwallow(gaylene, milt) -> Vomit(milt, gaylene)\nforall x (Swallow(x, milt) -> Camphorate(x, milt))\nforall x (Camphorate(x, milt) -> Nonpublic(x))\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Swallow(x, milt))\nforall x (Liquified(x) and Swallow(x, milt) -> Vomit(milt, gaylene))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\n\nnot Vomit(milt, gaylene)\n\nSwallow(gaylene, milt) -> Vomit(milt, gaylene) <- forall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Swallow(x, milt)) <- forall x (Camphorate(x, milt) -> Nonpublic(x)) <- forall x (Swallow(x, milt) -> Camphorate(x, milt)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The kip is pubic. The celestyn is casebook. If the kip evangelize the celestyn then the celestyn blabber the kip. If something evangelize the celestyn then it abbreviate the celestyn. If something abbreviate the celestyn then it is casebook. If something is casebook then it evangelize the celestyn. If something is pubic and it evangelize the celestyn then the celestyn blabber the kip. If something is centrist then it is casebook. The kip abbreviate the celestyn.", "logic": "\nPubic(kip)\nCasebook(celestyn)\nEvangelize(kip, celestyn) -> Blabber(celestyn, kip)\nforall x (Evangelize(x, celestyn) -> Abbreviate(x, celestyn))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, celestyn) -> Casebook(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) -> Evangelize(x, celestyn))\nforall x (Pubic(x) and Evangelize(x, celestyn) -> Blabber(celestyn, kip))\nforall x (Centrist(x) -> Casebook(x))\n\nAbbreviate(kip, celestyn)\n\nforall x (Evangelize(x, celestyn) -> Abbreviate(x, celestyn)) <- forall x (Casebook(x) -> Evangelize(x, celestyn)) <- forall x (Abbreviate(x, celestyn) -> Casebook(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The willi is crooked. The hailey is thrown. If the willi lionize the hailey then the hailey capture the willi. If something lionize the hailey then it defat the hailey. If something defat the hailey then it is thrown. If something is thrown then it lionize the hailey. If something is crooked and it lionize the hailey then the hailey capture the willi. If something is dilatory then it is thrown. The willi is not thrown.", "logic": "\nCrooked(willi)\nThrown(hailey)\nLionize(willi, hailey) -> Capture(hailey, willi)\nforall x (Lionize(x, hailey) -> Defat(x, hailey))\nforall x (Defat(x, hailey) -> Thrown(x))\nforall x (Thrown(x) -> Lionize(x, hailey))\nforall x (Crooked(x) and Lionize(x, hailey) -> Capture(hailey, willi))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) -> Thrown(x))\n\nnot Thrown(willi)\n\nforall x (Defat(x, hailey) -> Thrown(x)) <- forall x (Lionize(x, hailey) -> Defat(x, hailey)) <- forall x (Thrown(x) -> Lionize(x, hailey)) <- forall x (Dilatory(x) -> Thrown(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The stacee is total. The sidonia is bismuthic. If the stacee heist the sidonia then the sidonia instrument the stacee. If something heist the sidonia then it foray the sidonia. If something foray the sidonia then it is bismuthic. If something is bismuthic then it heist the sidonia. If something is total and it heist the sidonia then the sidonia instrument the stacee. If something is unrivalled then it is bismuthic. The sidonia heist the stacee.", "logic": "\nTotal(stacee)\nBismuthic(sidonia)\nHeist(stacee, sidonia) -> Instrument(sidonia, stacee)\nforall x (Heist(x, sidonia) -> Foray(x, sidonia))\nforall x (Foray(x, sidonia) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> Heist(x, sidonia))\nforall x (Total(x) and Heist(x, sidonia) -> Instrument(sidonia, stacee))\nforall x (Unrivalled(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\n\nHeist(sidonia, stacee)\n\nHeist(sidonia, stacee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The thurston is rhizoidal. The toddy is bicyclic. If the thurston rake the toddy then the toddy agitate the thurston. If something rake the toddy then it rattle the toddy. If something rattle the toddy then it is bicyclic. If something is bicyclic then it rake the toddy. If something is rhizoidal and it rake the toddy then the toddy agitate the thurston. If something is habited then it is bicyclic. The thurston is not nice.", "logic": "\nRhizoidal(thurston)\nBicyclic(toddy)\nRake(thurston, toddy) -> Agitate(toddy, thurston)\nforall x (Rake(x, toddy) -> Rattle(x, toddy))\nforall x (Rattle(x, toddy) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) -> Rake(x, toddy))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) and Rake(x, toddy) -> Agitate(toddy, thurston))\nforall x (Habited(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\n\nnot Nice(thurston)\n\nnot Nice(thurston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The nikolai is waxlike. The maire is fair. If the nikolai peer the maire then the maire tamper the nikolai. If something peer the maire then it closet the maire. If something closet the maire then it is fair. If something is fair then it peer the maire. If something is waxlike and it peer the maire then the maire tamper the nikolai. If something is curvy then it is fair. The maire is waxlike.", "logic": "\nWaxlike(nikolai)\nFair(maire)\nPeer(nikolai, maire) -> Tamper(maire, nikolai)\nforall x (Peer(x, maire) -> Closet(x, maire))\nforall x (Closet(x, maire) -> Fair(x))\nforall x (Fair(x) -> Peer(x, maire))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and Peer(x, maire) -> Tamper(maire, nikolai))\nforall x (Curvy(x) -> Fair(x))\n\nWaxlike(maire)\n\nWaxlike(maire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "Charlena is tipped. Chaim is unlighted. Chaim is not chainlike. Chaim is incurable. Chaim is thorough. Chaim is yeatsian. Alan is unlighted. Alan is chainlike. Hanan is chainlike. Hanan is bleached. Hanan is not tipped. Hanan is yeatsian. If Alan is unlighted then Alan is tipped. All chainlike people are thorough. If someone is thorough then they are unlighted. Furry people are incurable. If someone is thorough then they are incurable. If someone is chainlike and not bleached then they are yeatsian. Hanan is yeatsian.", "logic": "\nTipped(charlena)\nUnlighted(chaim)\nnot Chainlike(chaim)\nIncurable(chaim)\nThorough(chaim)\nYeatsian(chaim)\nUnlighted(alan)\nChainlike(alan)\nChainlike(hanan)\nBleached(hanan)\nnot Tipped(hanan)\nYeatsian(hanan)\nUnlighted(alan) -> Tipped(alan)\nforall x (Chainlike(x) -> Thorough(x))\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Unlighted(x))\nforall x (Chainlike(x) -> Incurable(x))\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Incurable(x))\nforall x (Chainlike(x) and not Bleached(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\n\nYeatsian(hanan)\n\ntherefore Yeatsian(hanan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Binnie is elastic. Sandy is decadent. Sandy is not algolagnic. Sandy is erudite. Sandy is unlobed. Sandy is unedited. Kalli is decadent. Kalli is algolagnic. Elfrida is algolagnic. Elfrida is graduate. Elfrida is not elastic. Elfrida is unedited. If Kalli is decadent then Kalli is elastic. All algolagnic people are unlobed. If someone is unlobed then they are decadent. Furry people are erudite. If someone is unlobed then they are erudite. If someone is algolagnic and not graduate then they are unedited. Sandy is not unlobed.", "logic": "\nElastic(binnie)\nDecadent(sandy)\nnot Algolagnic(sandy)\nErudite(sandy)\nUnlobed(sandy)\nUnedited(sandy)\nDecadent(kalli)\nAlgolagnic(kalli)\nAlgolagnic(elfrida)\nGraduate(elfrida)\nnot Elastic(elfrida)\nUnedited(elfrida)\nDecadent(kalli) -> Elastic(kalli)\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) -> Unlobed(x))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) -> Decadent(x))\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) and not Graduate(x) -> Unedited(x))\n\nnot Unlobed(sandy)\n\ntherefore Unlobed(sandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Dabney is hateful. Arlene is scandalous. Arlene is not resonant. Arlene is limiting. Arlene is canonized. Arlene is endangered. Tann is scandalous. Tann is resonant. Norwood is resonant. Norwood is collect. Norwood is not hateful. Norwood is endangered. If Tann is scandalous then Tann is hateful. All resonant people are canonized. If someone is canonized then they are scandalous. Furry people are limiting. If someone is canonized then they are limiting. If someone is resonant and not collect then they are endangered. Norwood is canonized.", "logic": "\nHateful(dabney)\nScandalous(arlene)\nnot Resonant(arlene)\nLimiting(arlene)\nCanonized(arlene)\nEndangered(arlene)\nScandalous(tann)\nResonant(tann)\nResonant(norwood)\nCollect(norwood)\nnot Hateful(norwood)\nEndangered(norwood)\nScandalous(tann) -> Hateful(tann)\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Canonized(x))\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) and not Collect(x) -> Endangered(x))\n\nCanonized(norwood)\n\nResonant(norwood) and forall x (Resonant(x) -> Canonized(x)) -> therefore Canonized(norwood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Boris is costal. Nerissa is uncoupled. Nerissa is not cutting. Nerissa is bitter. Nerissa is pentagonal. Nerissa is monochrome. Dorena is uncoupled. Dorena is cutting. Augusta is cutting. Augusta is fatuous. Augusta is not costal. Augusta is monochrome. If Dorena is uncoupled then Dorena is costal. All cutting people are pentagonal. If someone is pentagonal then they are uncoupled. Furry people are bitter. If someone is pentagonal then they are bitter. If someone is cutting and not fatuous then they are monochrome. Dorena is not pentagonal.", "logic": "\nCostal(boris)\nUncoupled(nerissa)\nnot Cutting(nerissa)\nBitter(nerissa)\nPentagonal(nerissa)\nMonochrome(nerissa)\nUncoupled(dorena)\nCutting(dorena)\nCutting(augusta)\nFatuous(augusta)\nnot Costal(augusta)\nMonochrome(augusta)\nUncoupled(dorena) -> Costal(dorena)\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Uncoupled(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) and not Fatuous(x) -> Monochrome(x))\n\nnot Pentagonal(dorena)\n\nCutting(dorena) and forall x (Cutting(x) -> Pentagonal(x)) -> therefore Pentagonal(dorena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Elva is unrimed. Tarah is orchestral. Tarah is not pressed. Tarah is detested. Tarah is roughish. Tarah is analyzed. Peyton is orchestral. Peyton is pressed. Teena is pressed. Teena is carbonyl. Teena is not unrimed. Teena is analyzed. If Peyton is orchestral then Peyton is unrimed. All pressed people are roughish. If someone is roughish then they are orchestral. Furry people are detested. If someone is roughish then they are detested. If someone is pressed and not carbonyl then they are analyzed. Teena is orchestral.", "logic": "\nUnrimed(elva)\nOrchestral(tarah)\nnot Pressed(tarah)\nDetested(tarah)\nRoughish(tarah)\nAnalyzed(tarah)\nOrchestral(peyton)\nPressed(peyton)\nPressed(teena)\nCarbonyl(teena)\nnot Unrimed(teena)\nAnalyzed(teena)\nOrchestral(peyton) -> Unrimed(peyton)\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Roughish(x) -> Orchestral(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Roughish(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) and not Carbonyl(x) -> Analyzed(x))\n\nOrchestral(teena)\n\nPressed(teena) and forall x (Pressed(x) -> Roughish(x)) -> therefore Roughish(teena) Roughish(teena) and forall x (Roughish(x) -> Orchestral(x)) -> therefore Orchestral(teena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Ulises is contorted. Ashby is dazed. Ashby is not sloped. Ashby is cystic. Ashby is cantonal. Ashby is inguinal. Halette is dazed. Halette is sloped. Alexi is sloped. Alexi is monotone. Alexi is not contorted. Alexi is inguinal. If Halette is dazed then Halette is contorted. All sloped people are cantonal. If someone is cantonal then they are dazed. Furry people are cystic. If someone is cantonal then they are cystic. If someone is sloped and not monotone then they are inguinal. Alexi is not dazed.", "logic": "\nContorted(ulises)\nDazed(ashby)\nnot Sloped(ashby)\nCystic(ashby)\nCantonal(ashby)\nInguinal(ashby)\nDazed(halette)\nSloped(halette)\nSloped(alexi)\nMonotone(alexi)\nnot Contorted(alexi)\nInguinal(alexi)\nDazed(halette) -> Contorted(halette)\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Cantonal(x))\nforall x (Cantonal(x) -> Dazed(x))\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Cystic(x))\nforall x (Cantonal(x) -> Cystic(x))\nforall x (Sloped(x) and not Monotone(x) -> Inguinal(x))\n\nnot Dazed(alexi)\n\nSloped(alexi) and forall x (Sloped(x) -> Cantonal(x)) -> therefore Cantonal(alexi) Cantonal(alexi) and forall x (Cantonal(x) -> Dazed(x)) -> therefore Dazed(alexi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Abdel is disarrayed. Kassie is satirical. Kassie is not granular. Kassie is alarming. Kassie is neapolitan. Kassie is unbearable. Serena is satirical. Serena is granular. Rubia is granular. Rubia is retrograde. Rubia is not disarrayed. Rubia is unbearable. If Serena is satirical then Serena is disarrayed. All granular people are neapolitan. If someone is neapolitan then they are satirical. Furry people are alarming. If someone is neapolitan then they are alarming. If someone is granular and not retrograde then they are unbearable. Abdel is not unbearable.", "logic": "\nDisarrayed(abdel)\nSatirical(kassie)\nnot Granular(kassie)\nAlarming(kassie)\nNeapolitan(kassie)\nUnbearable(kassie)\nSatirical(serena)\nGranular(serena)\nGranular(rubia)\nRetrograde(rubia)\nnot Disarrayed(rubia)\nUnbearable(rubia)\nSatirical(serena) -> Disarrayed(serena)\nforall x (Granular(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Satirical(x))\nforall x (Granular(x) -> Alarming(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Alarming(x))\nforall x (Granular(x) and not Retrograde(x) -> Unbearable(x))\n\nnot Unbearable(abdel)\n\nforall x (Granular(x) and not Retrograde(x) -> Unbearable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Nicola is secret. Kirstyn is brindle. Kirstyn is not metrical. Kirstyn is sigmoid. Kirstyn is classified. Kirstyn is arillate. Vincents is brindle. Vincents is metrical. Quincy is metrical. Quincy is salmon. Quincy is not secret. Quincy is arillate. If Vincents is brindle then Vincents is secret. All metrical people are classified. If someone is classified then they are brindle. Furry people are sigmoid. If someone is classified then they are sigmoid. If someone is metrical and not salmon then they are arillate. Nicola is sigmoid.", "logic": "\nSecret(nicola)\nBrindle(kirstyn)\nnot Metrical(kirstyn)\nSigmoid(kirstyn)\nClassified(kirstyn)\nArillate(kirstyn)\nBrindle(vincents)\nMetrical(vincents)\nMetrical(quincy)\nSalmon(quincy)\nnot Secret(quincy)\nArillate(quincy)\nBrindle(vincents) -> Secret(vincents)\nforall x (Metrical(x) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Metrical(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nforall x (Metrical(x) and not Salmon(x) -> Arillate(x))\n\nSigmoid(nicola)\n\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Sigmoid(x)) <- forall x (Metrical(x) -> Classified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Les is ringlike. Carolyne is manic. Carolyne is not rustless. Carolyne is unsmoothed. Carolyne is amative. Carolyne is blocky. Corrinne is manic. Corrinne is rustless. Nixie is rustless. Nixie is rolling. Nixie is not ringlike. Nixie is blocky. If Corrinne is manic then Corrinne is ringlike. All rustless people are amative. If someone is amative then they are manic. Furry people are unsmoothed. If someone is amative then they are unsmoothed. If someone is rustless and not rolling then they are blocky. Corrinne is not blocky.", "logic": "\nRinglike(les)\nManic(carolyne)\nnot Rustless(carolyne)\nUnsmoothed(carolyne)\nAmative(carolyne)\nBlocky(carolyne)\nManic(corrinne)\nRustless(corrinne)\nRustless(nixie)\nRolling(nixie)\nnot Ringlike(nixie)\nBlocky(nixie)\nManic(corrinne) -> Ringlike(corrinne)\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Amative(x))\nforall x (Amative(x) -> Manic(x))\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Unsmoothed(x))\nforall x (Amative(x) -> Unsmoothed(x))\nforall x (Rustless(x) and not Rolling(x) -> Blocky(x))\n\nnot Blocky(corrinne)\n\nforall x (Rustless(x) and not Rolling(x) -> Blocky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Daphna is ribless. Teador is eloquent. Teador is not milky. Teador is motorless. Teador is atheistic. Teador is edifying. Deb is eloquent. Deb is milky. Dina is milky. Dina is burled. Dina is not ribless. Dina is edifying. If Deb is eloquent then Deb is ribless. All milky people are atheistic. If someone is atheistic then they are eloquent. Furry people are motorless. If someone is atheistic then they are motorless. If someone is milky and not burled then they are edifying. Teador is ribless.", "logic": "\nRibless(daphna)\nEloquent(teador)\nnot Milky(teador)\nMotorless(teador)\nAtheistic(teador)\nEdifying(teador)\nEloquent(deb)\nMilky(deb)\nMilky(dina)\nBurled(dina)\nnot Ribless(dina)\nEdifying(dina)\nEloquent(deb) -> Ribless(deb)\nforall x (Milky(x) -> Atheistic(x))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) -> Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Milky(x) -> Motorless(x))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) -> Motorless(x))\nforall x (Milky(x) and not Burled(x) -> Edifying(x))\n\nRibless(teador)\n\nRibless(teador) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Keenan is mirthful. Anselma is unsheathed. Anselma is not kafkaesque. Anselma is expansive. Anselma is glaciated. Anselma is municipal. Florenza is unsheathed. Florenza is kafkaesque. Libby is kafkaesque. Libby is astylar. Libby is not mirthful. Libby is municipal. If Florenza is unsheathed then Florenza is mirthful. All kafkaesque people are glaciated. If someone is glaciated then they are unsheathed. Furry people are expansive. If someone is glaciated then they are expansive. If someone is kafkaesque and not astylar then they are municipal. Keenan is not astylar.", "logic": "\nMirthful(keenan)\nUnsheathed(anselma)\nnot Kafkaesque(anselma)\nExpansive(anselma)\nGlaciated(anselma)\nMunicipal(anselma)\nUnsheathed(florenza)\nKafkaesque(florenza)\nKafkaesque(libby)\nAstylar(libby)\nnot Mirthful(libby)\nMunicipal(libby)\nUnsheathed(florenza) -> Mirthful(florenza)\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) -> Glaciated(x))\nforall x (Glaciated(x) -> Unsheathed(x))\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) -> Expansive(x))\nforall x (Glaciated(x) -> Expansive(x))\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) and not Astylar(x) -> Municipal(x))\n\nnot Astylar(keenan)\n\nnot Astylar(keenan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "Carmelia is adscripted. Andee is cheerless. Andee is not septrional. Andee is incurved. Andee is enlarged. Andee is brilliant. Modestine is cheerless. Modestine is septrional. Salim is septrional. Salim is enticing. Salim is not adscripted. Salim is brilliant. If Modestine is cheerless then Modestine is adscripted. All septrional people are enlarged. If someone is enlarged then they are cheerless. Furry people are incurved. If someone is enlarged then they are incurved. If someone is septrional and not enticing then they are brilliant. Modestine is enticing.", "logic": "\nAdscripted(carmelia)\nCheerless(andee)\nnot Septrional(andee)\nIncurved(andee)\nEnlarged(andee)\nBrilliant(andee)\nCheerless(modestine)\nSeptrional(modestine)\nSeptrional(salim)\nEnticing(salim)\nnot Adscripted(salim)\nBrilliant(salim)\nCheerless(modestine) -> Adscripted(modestine)\nforall x (Septrional(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Cheerless(x))\nforall x (Septrional(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Septrional(x) and not Enticing(x) -> Brilliant(x))\n\nEnticing(modestine)\n\nEnticing(modestine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-658"} {"premises": "The dana is booked. If the dana is attempted then the dana is inelastic. Round things are attempted. All booked things are attempted. If something is attempted and not booked then it is prospering. If something is inelastic then it is elvish. If something is booked and not attempted then it is elvish. If something is prospering and not booked then it is not elvish. All prospering things are elvish. The dana is booked.", "logic": "\nBooked(dana)\nAttempted(dana) -> Inelastic(dana)\nforall x (Booked(x) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Booked(x) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Attempted(x) and not Booked(x) -> Prospering(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Booked(x) and not Attempted(x) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) and not Booked(x) -> not Elvish(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) -> Elvish(x))\n\nBooked(dana)\n\ntherefore Booked(dana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The gennifer is cycloidal. If the gennifer is hedonic then the gennifer is aestival. Round things are hedonic. All cycloidal things are hedonic. If something is hedonic and not cycloidal then it is dead. If something is aestival then it is trabeated. If something is cycloidal and not hedonic then it is trabeated. If something is dead and not cycloidal then it is not trabeated. All dead things are trabeated. The gennifer is not cycloidal.", "logic": "\nCycloidal(gennifer)\nHedonic(gennifer) -> Aestival(gennifer)\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) -> Hedonic(x))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) -> Hedonic(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) and not Cycloidal(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Trabeated(x))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) and not Hedonic(x) -> Trabeated(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) and not Cycloidal(x) -> not Trabeated(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) -> Trabeated(x))\n\nnot Cycloidal(gennifer)\n\ntherefore Cycloidal(gennifer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The stanford is wilted. If the stanford is mitral then the stanford is inconstant. Round things are mitral. All wilted things are mitral. If something is mitral and not wilted then it is bowing. If something is inconstant then it is extricable. If something is wilted and not mitral then it is extricable. If something is bowing and not wilted then it is not extricable. All bowing things are extricable. The stanford is mitral.", "logic": "\nWilted(stanford)\nMitral(stanford) -> Inconstant(stanford)\nforall x (Wilted(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Wilted(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Mitral(x) and not Wilted(x) -> Bowing(x))\nforall x (Inconstant(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Wilted(x) and not Mitral(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Bowing(x) and not Wilted(x) -> not Extricable(x))\nforall x (Bowing(x) -> Extricable(x))\n\nMitral(stanford)\n\nWilted(stanford) and forall x (Wilted(x) -> Mitral(x)) -> therefore Mitral(stanford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The jakob is belgian. If the jakob is pumped then the jakob is ateleiotic. Round things are pumped. All belgian things are pumped. If something is pumped and not belgian then it is isolating. If something is ateleiotic then it is slangy. If something is belgian and not pumped then it is slangy. If something is isolating and not belgian then it is not slangy. All isolating things are slangy. The jakob is not pumped.", "logic": "\nBelgian(jakob)\nPumped(jakob) -> Ateleiotic(jakob)\nforall x (Belgian(x) -> Pumped(x))\nforall x (Belgian(x) -> Pumped(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) and not Belgian(x) -> Isolating(x))\nforall x (Ateleiotic(x) -> Slangy(x))\nforall x (Belgian(x) and not Pumped(x) -> Slangy(x))\nforall x (Isolating(x) and not Belgian(x) -> not Slangy(x))\nforall x (Isolating(x) -> Slangy(x))\n\nnot Pumped(jakob)\n\nBelgian(jakob) and forall x (Belgian(x) -> Pumped(x)) -> therefore Pumped(jakob)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The francisca is french. If the francisca is copesetic then the francisca is dantesque. Round things are copesetic. All french things are copesetic. If something is copesetic and not french then it is atheistic. If something is dantesque then it is precooked. If something is french and not copesetic then it is precooked. If something is atheistic and not french then it is not precooked. All atheistic things are precooked. The francisca is dantesque.", "logic": "\nFrench(francisca)\nCopesetic(francisca) -> Dantesque(francisca)\nforall x (French(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (French(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and not French(x) -> Atheistic(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Precooked(x))\nforall x (French(x) and not Copesetic(x) -> Precooked(x))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) and not French(x) -> not Precooked(x))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) -> Precooked(x))\n\nDantesque(francisca)\n\nFrench(francisca) and forall x (French(x) -> Copesetic(x)) -> therefore Copesetic(francisca) Copesetic(francisca) and Copesetic(francisca) -> Dantesque(francisca) -> therefore Dantesque(francisca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The taryn is magic. If the taryn is unrigged then the taryn is begrimed. Round things are unrigged. All magic things are unrigged. If something is unrigged and not magic then it is incoherent. If something is begrimed then it is neutered. If something is magic and not unrigged then it is neutered. If something is incoherent and not magic then it is not neutered. All incoherent things are neutered. The taryn is not begrimed.", "logic": "\nMagic(taryn)\nUnrigged(taryn) -> Begrimed(taryn)\nforall x (Magic(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Magic(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) and not Magic(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Begrimed(x) -> Neutered(x))\nforall x (Magic(x) and not Unrigged(x) -> Neutered(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and not Magic(x) -> not Neutered(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) -> Neutered(x))\n\nnot Begrimed(taryn)\n\nMagic(taryn) and forall x (Magic(x) -> Unrigged(x)) -> therefore Unrigged(taryn) Unrigged(taryn) and Unrigged(taryn) -> Begrimed(taryn) -> therefore Begrimed(taryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The bernette is ample. If the bernette is avocado then the bernette is unworthy. Round things are avocado. All ample things are avocado. If something is avocado and not ample then it is finicky. If something is unworthy then it is moveable. If something is ample and not avocado then it is moveable. If something is finicky and not ample then it is not moveable. All finicky things are moveable. The bernette is not finicky.", "logic": "\nAmple(bernette)\nAvocado(bernette) -> Unworthy(bernette)\nforall x (Ample(x) -> Avocado(x))\nforall x (Ample(x) -> Avocado(x))\nforall x (Avocado(x) and not Ample(x) -> Finicky(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Moveable(x))\nforall x (Ample(x) and not Avocado(x) -> Moveable(x))\nforall x (Finicky(x) and not Ample(x) -> not Moveable(x))\nforall x (Finicky(x) -> Moveable(x))\n\nnot Finicky(bernette)\n\nforall x (Avocado(x) and not Ample(x) -> Finicky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The malka is twinkly. If the malka is expanded then the malka is obese. Round things are expanded. All twinkly things are expanded. If something is expanded and not twinkly then it is domed. If something is obese then it is reported. If something is twinkly and not expanded then it is reported. If something is domed and not twinkly then it is not reported. All domed things are reported. The malka sees the malka.", "logic": "\nTwinkly(malka)\nExpanded(malka) -> Obese(malka)\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Expanded(x) and not Twinkly(x) -> Domed(x))\nforall x (Obese(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) and not Expanded(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Domed(x) and not Twinkly(x) -> not Reported(x))\nforall x (Domed(x) -> Reported(x))\n\nSees(malka, malka)\n\nSees(malka, malka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The carena is uricosuric. If the carena is able then the carena is exploited. Round things are able. All uricosuric things are able. If something is able and not uricosuric then it is palpebrate. If something is exploited then it is dural. If something is uricosuric and not able then it is dural. If something is palpebrate and not uricosuric then it is not dural. All palpebrate things are dural. The carena does not eat the carena.", "logic": "\nUricosuric(carena)\nAble(carena) -> Exploited(carena)\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Able(x) and not Uricosuric(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Exploited(x) -> Dural(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) and not Able(x) -> Dural(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and not Uricosuric(x) -> not Dural(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Dural(x))\n\nnot Eats(carena, carena)\n\nnot Eats(carena, carena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The mick is cockamamie. If the mick is barky then the mick is diagnostic. Round things are barky. All cockamamie things are barky. If something is barky and not cockamamie then it is riddled. If something is diagnostic then it is unavailing. If something is cockamamie and not barky then it is unavailing. If something is riddled and not cockamamie then it is not unavailing. All riddled things are unavailing. The mick visits the mick.", "logic": "\nCockamamie(mick)\nBarky(mick) -> Diagnostic(mick)\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) -> Barky(x))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) -> Barky(x))\nforall x (Barky(x) and not Cockamamie(x) -> Riddled(x))\nforall x (Diagnostic(x) -> Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) and not Barky(x) -> Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Riddled(x) and not Cockamamie(x) -> not Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> Unavailing(x))\n\nVisits(mick, mick)\n\nVisits(mick, mick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1202"} {"premises": "The cristi factor the dari. The amos repugn the cristi. The amos repugn the dari. The amos shmooze the dari. The amos is ultra. The amos is merciful. The dari repugn the cristi. The dari is merciful. The dari factor the cristi. The dari factor the amos. If something repugn the dari then it factor the amos. If something repugn the dari then it shmooze the amos. If the cristi is ultra then the cristi factor the amos. If something shmooze the amos then it repugn the amos. If something factor the dari then it repugn the dari. If the dari factor the amos then the dari shmooze the cristi. The amos is ultra.", "logic": "\nFactor(cristi, dari)\nRepugn(amos, cristi)\nRepugn(amos, dari)\nShmooze(amos, dari)\nUltra(amos)\nMerciful(amos)\nRepugn(dari, cristi)\nMerciful(dari)\nFactor(dari, cristi)\nFactor(dari, amos)\nforall x (Repugn(x, dari) -> Factor(x, amos))\nforall x (Repugn(x, dari) -> Shmooze(x, amos))\nUltra(cristi) -> Factor(cristi, amos)\nforall x (Shmooze(x, amos) -> Repugn(x, amos))\nforall x (Factor(x, dari) -> Repugn(x, dari))\nFactor(dari, amos) -> Shmooze(dari, cristi)\n\nUltra(amos)\n\ntherefore Ultra(amos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The zared recreate the teane. The persis outperform the zared. The persis outperform the teane. The persis occult the teane. The persis is alto. The persis is online. The teane outperform the zared. The teane is online. The teane recreate the zared. The teane recreate the persis. If something outperform the teane then it recreate the persis. If something outperform the teane then it occult the persis. If the zared is alto then the zared recreate the persis. If something occult the persis then it outperform the persis. If something recreate the teane then it outperform the teane. If the teane recreate the persis then the teane occult the zared. The teane does not see the zared.", "logic": "\nRecreate(zared, teane)\nOutperform(persis, zared)\nOutperform(persis, teane)\nOccult(persis, teane)\nAlto(persis)\nOnline(persis)\nOutperform(teane, zared)\nOnline(teane)\nRecreate(teane, zared)\nRecreate(teane, persis)\nforall x (Outperform(x, teane) -> Recreate(x, persis))\nforall x (Outperform(x, teane) -> Occult(x, persis))\nAlto(zared) -> Recreate(zared, persis)\nforall x (Occult(x, persis) -> Outperform(x, persis))\nforall x (Recreate(x, teane) -> Outperform(x, teane))\nRecreate(teane, persis) -> Occult(teane, zared)\n\nnot Recreate(teane, zared)\n\ntherefore Recreate(teane, zared)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The louise slide the ada. The reggis overstress the louise. The reggis overstress the ada. The reggis consign the ada. The reggis is bungled. The reggis is symbiotic. The ada overstress the louise. The ada is symbiotic. The ada slide the louise. The ada slide the reggis. If something overstress the ada then it slide the reggis. If something overstress the ada then it consign the reggis. If the louise is bungled then the louise slide the reggis. If something consign the reggis then it overstress the reggis. If something slide the ada then it overstress the ada. If the ada slide the reggis then the ada consign the louise. The ada consign the louise.", "logic": "\nSlide(louise, ada)\nOverstress(reggis, louise)\nOverstress(reggis, ada)\nConsign(reggis, ada)\nBungled(reggis)\nSymbiotic(reggis)\nOverstress(ada, louise)\nSymbiotic(ada)\nSlide(ada, louise)\nSlide(ada, reggis)\nforall x (Overstress(x, ada) -> Slide(x, reggis))\nforall x (Overstress(x, ada) -> Consign(x, reggis))\nBungled(louise) -> Slide(louise, reggis)\nforall x (Consign(x, reggis) -> Overstress(x, reggis))\nforall x (Slide(x, ada) -> Overstress(x, ada))\nSlide(ada, reggis) -> Consign(ada, louise)\n\nConsign(ada, louise)\n\nSlide(ada, reggis) and Slide(ada, reggis) -> Consign(ada, louise) -> therefore Consign(ada, louise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The victoria rank the marya. The josephina crossbreed the victoria. The josephina crossbreed the marya. The josephina introject the marya. The josephina is superable. The josephina is autonomous. The marya crossbreed the victoria. The marya is autonomous. The marya rank the victoria. The marya rank the josephina. If something crossbreed the marya then it rank the josephina. If something crossbreed the marya then it introject the josephina. If the victoria is superable then the victoria rank the josephina. If something introject the josephina then it crossbreed the josephina. If something rank the marya then it crossbreed the marya. If the marya rank the josephina then the marya introject the victoria. The victoria does not chase the marya.", "logic": "\nRank(victoria, marya)\nCrossbreed(josephina, victoria)\nCrossbreed(josephina, marya)\nIntroject(josephina, marya)\nSuperable(josephina)\nAutonomous(josephina)\nCrossbreed(marya, victoria)\nAutonomous(marya)\nRank(marya, victoria)\nRank(marya, josephina)\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, marya) -> Rank(x, josephina))\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, marya) -> Introject(x, josephina))\nSuperable(victoria) -> Rank(victoria, josephina)\nforall x (Introject(x, josephina) -> Crossbreed(x, josephina))\nforall x (Rank(x, marya) -> Crossbreed(x, marya))\nRank(marya, josephina) -> Introject(marya, victoria)\n\nnot Crossbreed(victoria, marya)\n\nRank(victoria, marya) and forall x (Rank(x, marya) -> Crossbreed(x, marya)) -> therefore Crossbreed(victoria, marya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The wye affiliate the gilberta. The thea airt the wye. The thea airt the gilberta. The thea caponise the gilberta. The thea is unworried. The thea is humified. The gilberta airt the wye. The gilberta is humified. The gilberta affiliate the wye. The gilberta affiliate the thea. If something airt the gilberta then it affiliate the thea. If something airt the gilberta then it caponise the thea. If the wye is unworried then the wye affiliate the thea. If something caponise the thea then it airt the thea. If something affiliate the gilberta then it airt the gilberta. If the gilberta affiliate the thea then the gilberta caponise the wye. The wye caponise the thea.", "logic": "\nAffiliate(wye, gilberta)\nAirt(thea, wye)\nAirt(thea, gilberta)\nCaponise(thea, gilberta)\nUnworried(thea)\nHumified(thea)\nAirt(gilberta, wye)\nHumified(gilberta)\nAffiliate(gilberta, wye)\nAffiliate(gilberta, thea)\nforall x (Airt(x, gilberta) -> Affiliate(x, thea))\nforall x (Airt(x, gilberta) -> Caponise(x, thea))\nUnworried(wye) -> Affiliate(wye, thea)\nforall x (Caponise(x, thea) -> Airt(x, thea))\nforall x (Affiliate(x, gilberta) -> Airt(x, gilberta))\nAffiliate(gilberta, thea) -> Caponise(gilberta, wye)\n\nCaponise(wye, thea)\n\nAffiliate(wye, gilberta) and forall x (Affiliate(x, gilberta) -> Airt(x, gilberta)) -> therefore Airt(wye, gilberta) Airt(wye, gilberta) and forall x (Airt(x, gilberta) -> Caponise(x, thea)) -> therefore Caponise(wye, thea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The nellie begin the marc. The myna actualise the nellie. The myna actualise the marc. The myna namedrop the marc. The myna is pantropic. The myna is nepalese. The marc actualise the nellie. The marc is nepalese. The marc begin the nellie. The marc begin the myna. If something actualise the marc then it begin the myna. If something actualise the marc then it namedrop the myna. If the nellie is pantropic then the nellie begin the myna. If something namedrop the myna then it actualise the myna. If something begin the marc then it actualise the marc. If the marc begin the myna then the marc namedrop the nellie. The nellie does not see the myna.", "logic": "\nBegin(nellie, marc)\nActualise(myna, nellie)\nActualise(myna, marc)\nNamedrop(myna, marc)\nPantropic(myna)\nNepalese(myna)\nActualise(marc, nellie)\nNepalese(marc)\nBegin(marc, nellie)\nBegin(marc, myna)\nforall x (Actualise(x, marc) -> Begin(x, myna))\nforall x (Actualise(x, marc) -> Namedrop(x, myna))\nPantropic(nellie) -> Begin(nellie, myna)\nforall x (Namedrop(x, myna) -> Actualise(x, myna))\nforall x (Begin(x, marc) -> Actualise(x, marc))\nBegin(marc, myna) -> Namedrop(marc, nellie)\n\nnot Begin(nellie, myna)\n\nBegin(nellie, marc) and forall x (Begin(x, marc) -> Actualise(x, marc)) -> therefore Actualise(nellie, marc) Actualise(nellie, marc) and forall x (Actualise(x, marc) -> Begin(x, myna)) -> therefore Begin(nellie, myna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The nike raven the fredrika. The yonina shred the nike. The yonina shred the fredrika. The yonina require the fredrika. The yonina is courteous. The yonina is sized. The fredrika shred the nike. The fredrika is sized. The fredrika raven the nike. The fredrika raven the yonina. If something shred the fredrika then it raven the yonina. If something shred the fredrika then it require the yonina. If the nike is courteous then the nike raven the yonina. If something require the yonina then it shred the yonina. If something raven the fredrika then it shred the fredrika. If the fredrika raven the yonina then the fredrika require the nike. The fredrika does not eat the yonina.", "logic": "\nRaven(nike, fredrika)\nShred(yonina, nike)\nShred(yonina, fredrika)\nRequire(yonina, fredrika)\nCourteous(yonina)\nSized(yonina)\nShred(fredrika, nike)\nSized(fredrika)\nRaven(fredrika, nike)\nRaven(fredrika, yonina)\nforall x (Shred(x, fredrika) -> Raven(x, yonina))\nforall x (Shred(x, fredrika) -> Require(x, yonina))\nCourteous(nike) -> Raven(nike, yonina)\nforall x (Require(x, yonina) -> Shred(x, yonina))\nforall x (Raven(x, fredrika) -> Shred(x, fredrika))\nRaven(fredrika, yonina) -> Require(fredrika, nike)\n\nnot Require(fredrika, yonina)\n\nforall x (Shred(x, fredrika) -> Require(x, yonina)) <- forall x (Raven(x, fredrika) -> Shred(x, fredrika)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The elijah subtilize the anitra. The easton federate the elijah. The easton federate the anitra. The easton practice the anitra. The easton is knavish. The easton is worsened. The anitra federate the elijah. The anitra is worsened. The anitra subtilize the elijah. The anitra subtilize the easton. If something federate the anitra then it subtilize the easton. If something federate the anitra then it practice the easton. If the elijah is knavish then the elijah subtilize the easton. If something practice the easton then it federate the easton. If something subtilize the anitra then it federate the anitra. If the anitra subtilize the easton then the anitra practice the elijah. The anitra federate the easton.", "logic": "\nSubtilize(elijah, anitra)\nFederate(easton, elijah)\nFederate(easton, anitra)\nPractice(easton, anitra)\nKnavish(easton)\nWorsened(easton)\nFederate(anitra, elijah)\nWorsened(anitra)\nSubtilize(anitra, elijah)\nSubtilize(anitra, easton)\nforall x (Federate(x, anitra) -> Subtilize(x, easton))\nforall x (Federate(x, anitra) -> Practice(x, easton))\nKnavish(elijah) -> Subtilize(elijah, easton)\nforall x (Practice(x, easton) -> Federate(x, easton))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, anitra) -> Federate(x, anitra))\nSubtilize(anitra, easton) -> Practice(anitra, elijah)\n\nFederate(anitra, easton)\n\nforall x (Practice(x, easton) -> Federate(x, easton)) <- forall x (Federate(x, anitra) -> Practice(x, easton)) <- forall x (Subtilize(x, anitra) -> Federate(x, anitra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The caron bull the quintin. The steffie demoralize the caron. The steffie demoralize the quintin. The steffie filch the quintin. The steffie is genitive. The steffie is canescent. The quintin demoralize the caron. The quintin is canescent. The quintin bull the caron. The quintin bull the steffie. If something demoralize the quintin then it bull the steffie. If something demoralize the quintin then it filch the steffie. If the caron is genitive then the caron bull the steffie. If something filch the steffie then it demoralize the steffie. If something bull the quintin then it demoralize the quintin. If the quintin bull the steffie then the quintin filch the caron. The quintin does not chase the quintin.", "logic": "\nBull(caron, quintin)\nDemoralize(steffie, caron)\nDemoralize(steffie, quintin)\nFilch(steffie, quintin)\nGenitive(steffie)\nCanescent(steffie)\nDemoralize(quintin, caron)\nCanescent(quintin)\nBull(quintin, caron)\nBull(quintin, steffie)\nforall x (Demoralize(x, quintin) -> Bull(x, steffie))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, quintin) -> Filch(x, steffie))\nGenitive(caron) -> Bull(caron, steffie)\nforall x (Filch(x, steffie) -> Demoralize(x, steffie))\nforall x (Bull(x, quintin) -> Demoralize(x, quintin))\nBull(quintin, steffie) -> Filch(quintin, caron)\n\nnot Demoralize(quintin, quintin)\n\nforall x (Bull(x, quintin) -> Demoralize(x, quintin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The apollo bounce the reuben. The julian fumigate the apollo. The julian fumigate the reuben. The julian bunch the reuben. The julian is feathery. The julian is unowned. The reuben fumigate the apollo. The reuben is unowned. The reuben bounce the apollo. The reuben bounce the julian. If something fumigate the reuben then it bounce the julian. If something fumigate the reuben then it bunch the julian. If the apollo is feathery then the apollo bounce the julian. If something bunch the julian then it fumigate the julian. If something bounce the reuben then it fumigate the reuben. If the reuben bounce the julian then the reuben bunch the apollo. The julian is blue.", "logic": "\nBounce(apollo, reuben)\nFumigate(julian, apollo)\nFumigate(julian, reuben)\nBunch(julian, reuben)\nFeathery(julian)\nUnowned(julian)\nFumigate(reuben, apollo)\nUnowned(reuben)\nBounce(reuben, apollo)\nBounce(reuben, julian)\nforall x (Fumigate(x, reuben) -> Bounce(x, julian))\nforall x (Fumigate(x, reuben) -> Bunch(x, julian))\nFeathery(apollo) -> Bounce(apollo, julian)\nforall x (Bunch(x, julian) -> Fumigate(x, julian))\nforall x (Bounce(x, reuben) -> Fumigate(x, reuben))\nBounce(reuben, julian) -> Bunch(reuben, apollo)\n\nBlue(julian)\n\nBlue(julian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The sherill fraternize the townie. The tybi heist the sherill. The tybi heist the townie. The tybi systemise the townie. The tybi is ammoniac. The tybi is liquified. The townie heist the sherill. The townie is liquified. The townie fraternize the sherill. The townie fraternize the tybi. If something heist the townie then it fraternize the tybi. If something heist the townie then it systemise the tybi. If the sherill is ammoniac then the sherill fraternize the tybi. If something systemise the tybi then it heist the tybi. If something fraternize the townie then it heist the townie. If the townie fraternize the tybi then the townie systemise the sherill. The sherill is not green.", "logic": "\nFraternize(sherill, townie)\nHeist(tybi, sherill)\nHeist(tybi, townie)\nSystemise(tybi, townie)\nAmmoniac(tybi)\nLiquified(tybi)\nHeist(townie, sherill)\nLiquified(townie)\nFraternize(townie, sherill)\nFraternize(townie, tybi)\nforall x (Heist(x, townie) -> Fraternize(x, tybi))\nforall x (Heist(x, townie) -> Systemise(x, tybi))\nAmmoniac(sherill) -> Fraternize(sherill, tybi)\nforall x (Systemise(x, tybi) -> Heist(x, tybi))\nforall x (Fraternize(x, townie) -> Heist(x, townie))\nFraternize(townie, tybi) -> Systemise(townie, sherill)\n\nnot Green(sherill)\n\nnot Green(sherill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "The scarlett rehash the sylvia. The virgil partition the scarlett. The virgil partition the sylvia. The virgil fiddle the sylvia. The virgil is overshot. The virgil is allergenic. The sylvia partition the scarlett. The sylvia is allergenic. The sylvia rehash the scarlett. The sylvia rehash the virgil. If something partition the sylvia then it rehash the virgil. If something partition the sylvia then it fiddle the virgil. If the scarlett is overshot then the scarlett rehash the virgil. If something fiddle the virgil then it partition the virgil. If something rehash the sylvia then it partition the sylvia. If the sylvia rehash the virgil then the sylvia fiddle the scarlett. The scarlett is blue.", "logic": "\nRehash(scarlett, sylvia)\nPartition(virgil, scarlett)\nPartition(virgil, sylvia)\nFiddle(virgil, sylvia)\nOvershot(virgil)\nAllergenic(virgil)\nPartition(sylvia, scarlett)\nAllergenic(sylvia)\nRehash(sylvia, scarlett)\nRehash(sylvia, virgil)\nforall x (Partition(x, sylvia) -> Rehash(x, virgil))\nforall x (Partition(x, sylvia) -> Fiddle(x, virgil))\nOvershot(scarlett) -> Rehash(scarlett, virgil)\nforall x (Fiddle(x, virgil) -> Partition(x, virgil))\nforall x (Rehash(x, sylvia) -> Partition(x, sylvia))\nRehash(sylvia, virgil) -> Fiddle(sylvia, scarlett)\n\nBlue(scarlett)\n\nBlue(scarlett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2077"} {"premises": "Levin is buttery. Levin is agamous. Levin is not lubricated. All rude people are not stressed. All buttery people are not stressed. If someone is lubricated then they are not agleam. All agamous people are rude. If Levin is lubricated then Levin is not agamous. Cold, rude people are not lubricated. If someone is buttery and not stressed then they are plutonic. If Levin is rude and Levin is not lubricated then Levin is plutonic. Levin is buttery.", "logic": "\nButtery(levin)\nAgamous(levin)\nnot Lubricated(levin)\nforall x (Rude(x) -> not Stressed(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> not Stressed(x))\nforall x (Lubricated(x) -> not Agleam(x))\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Rude(x))\nLubricated(levin) -> not Agamous(levin)\nforall x (Agleam(x) and Rude(x) -> not Lubricated(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) and not Stressed(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nRude(levin) and not Lubricated(levin) -> Plutonic(levin)\n\nButtery(levin)\n\ntherefore Buttery(levin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "Jessie is dissimilar. Jessie is empirical. Jessie is not palatal. All anecdotal people are not virile. All dissimilar people are not virile. If someone is palatal then they are not hempen. All empirical people are anecdotal. If Jessie is palatal then Jessie is not empirical. Cold, anecdotal people are not palatal. If someone is dissimilar and not virile then they are billowing. If Jessie is anecdotal and Jessie is not palatal then Jessie is billowing. Jessie is palatal.", "logic": "\nDissimilar(jessie)\nEmpirical(jessie)\nnot Palatal(jessie)\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) -> not Virile(x))\nforall x (Dissimilar(x) -> not Virile(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> not Hempen(x))\nforall x (Empirical(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\nPalatal(jessie) -> not Empirical(jessie)\nforall x (Hempen(x) and Anecdotal(x) -> not Palatal(x))\nforall x (Dissimilar(x) and not Virile(x) -> Billowing(x))\nAnecdotal(jessie) and not Palatal(jessie) -> Billowing(jessie)\n\nPalatal(jessie)\n\ntherefore not Palatal(jessie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "Randell is cuddlesome. Randell is friendly. Randell is not leisured. All resultant people are not acetic. All cuddlesome people are not acetic. If someone is leisured then they are not swept. All friendly people are resultant. If Randell is leisured then Randell is not friendly. Cold, resultant people are not leisured. If someone is cuddlesome and not acetic then they are fledgling. If Randell is resultant and Randell is not leisured then Randell is fledgling. Randell is not acetic.", "logic": "\nCuddlesome(randell)\nFriendly(randell)\nnot Leisured(randell)\nforall x (Resultant(x) -> not Acetic(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> not Acetic(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> not Swept(x))\nforall x (Friendly(x) -> Resultant(x))\nLeisured(randell) -> not Friendly(randell)\nforall x (Swept(x) and Resultant(x) -> not Leisured(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) and not Acetic(x) -> Fledgling(x))\nResultant(randell) and not Leisured(randell) -> Fledgling(randell)\n\nnot Acetic(randell)\n\nCuddlesome(randell) and forall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> not Acetic(x)) -> therefore not Acetic(randell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "Ellette is compressed. Ellette is anticipant. Ellette is not cogitative. All athenian people are not blindfold. All compressed people are not blindfold. If someone is cogitative then they are not disabused. All anticipant people are athenian. If Ellette is cogitative then Ellette is not anticipant. Cold, athenian people are not cogitative. If someone is compressed and not blindfold then they are dyadic. If Ellette is athenian and Ellette is not cogitative then Ellette is dyadic. Ellette is blindfold.", "logic": "\nCompressed(ellette)\nAnticipant(ellette)\nnot Cogitative(ellette)\nforall x (Athenian(x) -> not Blindfold(x))\nforall x (Compressed(x) -> not Blindfold(x))\nforall x (Cogitative(x) -> not Disabused(x))\nforall x (Anticipant(x) -> Athenian(x))\nCogitative(ellette) -> not Anticipant(ellette)\nforall x (Disabused(x) and Athenian(x) -> not Cogitative(x))\nforall x (Compressed(x) and not Blindfold(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nAthenian(ellette) and not Cogitative(ellette) -> Dyadic(ellette)\n\nBlindfold(ellette)\n\nCompressed(ellette) and forall x (Compressed(x) -> not Blindfold(x)) -> therefore not Blindfold(ellette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "Maurise is timeless. Maurise is infrequent. Maurise is not aliphatic. All avertible people are not accursed. All timeless people are not accursed. If someone is aliphatic then they are not cantonal. All infrequent people are avertible. If Maurise is aliphatic then Maurise is not infrequent. Cold, avertible people are not aliphatic. If someone is timeless and not accursed then they are pistillate. If Maurise is avertible and Maurise is not aliphatic then Maurise is pistillate. Maurise is pistillate.", "logic": "\nTimeless(maurise)\nInfrequent(maurise)\nnot Aliphatic(maurise)\nforall x (Avertible(x) -> not Accursed(x))\nforall x (Timeless(x) -> not Accursed(x))\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) -> not Cantonal(x))\nforall x (Infrequent(x) -> Avertible(x))\nAliphatic(maurise) -> not Infrequent(maurise)\nforall x (Cantonal(x) and Avertible(x) -> not Aliphatic(x))\nforall x (Timeless(x) and not Accursed(x) -> Pistillate(x))\nAvertible(maurise) and not Aliphatic(maurise) -> Pistillate(maurise)\n\nPistillate(maurise)\n\nTimeless(maurise) and forall x (Timeless(x) -> not Accursed(x)) -> therefore not Accursed(maurise) Timeless(maurise) and not Accursed(maurise) and forall x (Timeless(x) and not Accursed(x) -> Pistillate(x)) -> therefore Pistillate(maurise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "Riccardo is betrothed. Riccardo is toothless. Riccardo is not glacial. All jetting people are not weensy. All betrothed people are not weensy. If someone is glacial then they are not teensy. All toothless people are jetting. If Riccardo is glacial then Riccardo is not toothless. Cold, jetting people are not glacial. If someone is betrothed and not weensy then they are untempered. If Riccardo is jetting and Riccardo is not glacial then Riccardo is untempered. Riccardo is not untempered.", "logic": "\nBetrothed(riccardo)\nToothless(riccardo)\nnot Glacial(riccardo)\nforall x (Jetting(x) -> not Weensy(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> not Weensy(x))\nforall x (Glacial(x) -> not Teensy(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Jetting(x))\nGlacial(riccardo) -> not Toothless(riccardo)\nforall x (Teensy(x) and Jetting(x) -> not Glacial(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and not Weensy(x) -> Untempered(x))\nJetting(riccardo) and not Glacial(riccardo) -> Untempered(riccardo)\n\nnot Untempered(riccardo)\n\nBetrothed(riccardo) and forall x (Betrothed(x) -> not Weensy(x)) -> therefore not Weensy(riccardo) Betrothed(riccardo) and not Weensy(riccardo) and forall x (Betrothed(x) and not Weensy(x) -> Untempered(x)) -> therefore Untempered(riccardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "Laurence is driven. Leon is timely. Waring is antiknock. Belinda is driven. If someone is timely then they are semiweekly. If someone is semiweekly then they are unfocused. Leon is timely.", "logic": "\nDriven(laurence)\nTimely(leon)\nAntiknock(waring)\nDriven(belinda)\nforall x (Timely(x) -> Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Unfocused(x))\n\nTimely(leon)\n\ntherefore Timely(leon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Bearnard is crappy. Rosita is coated. Melly is highland. Klara is crappy. If someone is coated then they are limpid. If someone is limpid then they are coiling. Rosita is not coated.", "logic": "\nCrappy(bearnard)\nCoated(rosita)\nHighland(melly)\nCrappy(klara)\nforall x (Coated(x) -> Limpid(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) -> Coiling(x))\n\nnot Coated(rosita)\n\ntherefore Coated(rosita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Susanne is veracious. Kimberlee is organized. Quigly is oblique. Shanon is veracious. If someone is organized then they are chaldean. If someone is chaldean then they are codified. Kimberlee is chaldean.", "logic": "\nVeracious(susanne)\nOrganized(kimberlee)\nOblique(quigly)\nVeracious(shanon)\nforall x (Organized(x) -> Chaldean(x))\nforall x (Chaldean(x) -> Codified(x))\n\nChaldean(kimberlee)\n\nOrganized(kimberlee) and forall x (Organized(x) -> Chaldean(x)) -> therefore Chaldean(kimberlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Winnah is former. Uriah is midmost. Tedman is evasive. Mendie is former. If someone is midmost then they are preclusive. If someone is preclusive then they are gnarly. Uriah is not preclusive.", "logic": "\nFormer(winnah)\nMidmost(uriah)\nEvasive(tedman)\nFormer(mendie)\nforall x (Midmost(x) -> Preclusive(x))\nforall x (Preclusive(x) -> Gnarly(x))\n\nnot Preclusive(uriah)\n\nMidmost(uriah) and forall x (Midmost(x) -> Preclusive(x)) -> therefore Preclusive(uriah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Myrtice is renascent. Josselyn is aerial. Grover is choice. Imojean is renascent. If someone is aerial then they are sparing. If someone is sparing then they are migrant. Josselyn is migrant.", "logic": "\nRenascent(myrtice)\nAerial(josselyn)\nChoice(grover)\nRenascent(imojean)\nforall x (Aerial(x) -> Sparing(x))\nforall x (Sparing(x) -> Migrant(x))\n\nMigrant(josselyn)\n\nAerial(josselyn) and forall x (Aerial(x) -> Sparing(x)) -> therefore Sparing(josselyn) Sparing(josselyn) and forall x (Sparing(x) -> Migrant(x)) -> therefore Migrant(josselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Maiga is fairish. Flem is magyar. Annalee is unsexed. Margeaux is fairish. If someone is magyar then they are ominous. If someone is ominous then they are pelagic. Flem is not pelagic.", "logic": "\nFairish(maiga)\nMagyar(flem)\nUnsexed(annalee)\nFairish(margeaux)\nforall x (Magyar(x) -> Ominous(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) -> Pelagic(x))\n\nnot Pelagic(flem)\n\nMagyar(flem) and forall x (Magyar(x) -> Ominous(x)) -> therefore Ominous(flem) Ominous(flem) and forall x (Ominous(x) -> Pelagic(x)) -> therefore Pelagic(flem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Melessa is sinister. Lane is overarm. Aguste is tsaristic. Trula is sinister. If someone is overarm then they are boughten. If someone is boughten then they are laudable. Melessa is not laudable.", "logic": "\nSinister(melessa)\nOverarm(lane)\nTsaristic(aguste)\nSinister(trula)\nforall x (Overarm(x) -> Boughten(x))\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Laudable(x))\n\nnot Laudable(melessa)\n\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Laudable(x)) <- forall x (Overarm(x) -> Boughten(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Joete is ungallant. Blakeley is thunderous. Alane is crapulous. Lindsy is ungallant. If someone is thunderous then they are acerbic. If someone is acerbic then they are swampy. Lindsy is swampy.", "logic": "\nUngallant(joete)\nThunderous(blakeley)\nCrapulous(alane)\nUngallant(lindsy)\nforall x (Thunderous(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) -> Swampy(x))\n\nSwampy(lindsy)\n\nforall x (Acerbic(x) -> Swampy(x)) <- forall x (Thunderous(x) -> Acerbic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Annalee is falsetto. Simeon is unbraced. Zedekiah is certain. Nada is falsetto. If someone is unbraced then they are downmarket. If someone is downmarket then they are semitic. Annalee is not downmarket.", "logic": "\nFalsetto(annalee)\nUnbraced(simeon)\nCertain(zedekiah)\nFalsetto(nada)\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Downmarket(x))\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> Semitic(x))\n\nnot Downmarket(annalee)\n\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Downmarket(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Garfinkel is macaronic. Cletus is unexpected. Rutter is sleepy. Anthia is macaronic. If someone is unexpected then they are comforted. If someone is comforted then they are suspicious. Garfinkel is unexpected.", "logic": "\nMacaronic(garfinkel)\nUnexpected(cletus)\nSleepy(rutter)\nMacaronic(anthia)\nforall x (Unexpected(x) -> Comforted(x))\nforall x (Comforted(x) -> Suspicious(x))\n\nUnexpected(garfinkel)\n\nUnexpected(garfinkel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Ernie is latish. Flipper is brittle. Rochette is sauteed. Tarah is latish. If someone is brittle then they are amnesiac. If someone is amnesiac then they are sapphic. Tarah is not brittle.", "logic": "\nLatish(ernie)\nBrittle(flipper)\nSauteed(rochette)\nLatish(tarah)\nforall x (Brittle(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) -> Sapphic(x))\n\nnot Brittle(tarah)\n\nnot Brittle(tarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Germain is cyprinoid. Morley is octal. Angelia is danish. Ignacius is cyprinoid. If someone is octal then they are jungian. If someone is jungian then they are rotatable. Angelia is quiet.", "logic": "\nCyprinoid(germain)\nOctal(morley)\nDanish(angelia)\nCyprinoid(ignacius)\nforall x (Octal(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Jungian(x) -> Rotatable(x))\n\nQuiet(angelia)\n\nQuiet(angelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1490"} {"premises": "Wayne is collinear. Wayne is angular. Wayne is gummy. Thia is overladen. Mehetabel is not contralto. Mehetabel is forfeited. Mehetabel is collinear. Mehetabel is overladen. Mehetabel is not gummy. Mehetabel is not unhurt. Alla is not contralto. Alla is overladen. Alla is not angular. Alla is gummy. Alla is unhurt. If something is gummy then it is forfeited. All forfeited things are collinear. Alla is not contralto.", "logic": "\nCollinear(wayne)\nAngular(wayne)\nGummy(wayne)\nOverladen(thia)\nnot Contralto(mehetabel)\nForfeited(mehetabel)\nCollinear(mehetabel)\nOverladen(mehetabel)\nnot Gummy(mehetabel)\nnot Unhurt(mehetabel)\nnot Contralto(alla)\nOverladen(alla)\nnot Angular(alla)\nGummy(alla)\nUnhurt(alla)\nforall x (Gummy(x) -> Forfeited(x))\nforall x (Forfeited(x) -> Collinear(x))\n\nnot Contralto(alla)\n\ntherefore not Contralto(alla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Melva is lowbrow. Melva is djiboutian. Melva is articular. Garrot is anopheline. Abbey is not lonesome. Abbey is amoeban. Abbey is lowbrow. Abbey is anopheline. Abbey is not articular. Abbey is not exportable. Lester is not lonesome. Lester is anopheline. Lester is not djiboutian. Lester is articular. Lester is exportable. If something is articular then it is amoeban. All amoeban things are lowbrow. Melva is not djiboutian.", "logic": "\nLowbrow(melva)\nDjiboutian(melva)\nArticular(melva)\nAnopheline(garrot)\nnot Lonesome(abbey)\nAmoeban(abbey)\nLowbrow(abbey)\nAnopheline(abbey)\nnot Articular(abbey)\nnot Exportable(abbey)\nnot Lonesome(lester)\nAnopheline(lester)\nnot Djiboutian(lester)\nArticular(lester)\nExportable(lester)\nforall x (Articular(x) -> Amoeban(x))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\n\nnot Djiboutian(melva)\n\ntherefore Djiboutian(melva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Hiralal is transitive. Hiralal is charcoal. Hiralal is amateur. Marianna is undressed. Ignace is not invasive. Ignace is uncurved. Ignace is transitive. Ignace is undressed. Ignace is not amateur. Ignace is not perturbed. Rubin is not invasive. Rubin is undressed. Rubin is not charcoal. Rubin is amateur. Rubin is perturbed. If something is amateur then it is uncurved. All uncurved things are transitive. Rubin is uncurved.", "logic": "\nTransitive(hiralal)\nCharcoal(hiralal)\nAmateur(hiralal)\nUndressed(marianna)\nnot Invasive(ignace)\nUncurved(ignace)\nTransitive(ignace)\nUndressed(ignace)\nnot Amateur(ignace)\nnot Perturbed(ignace)\nnot Invasive(rubin)\nUndressed(rubin)\nnot Charcoal(rubin)\nAmateur(rubin)\nPerturbed(rubin)\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Uncurved(x))\nforall x (Uncurved(x) -> Transitive(x))\n\nUncurved(rubin)\n\nAmateur(rubin) and forall x (Amateur(x) -> Uncurved(x)) -> therefore Uncurved(rubin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Waiter is swooning. Waiter is conjoint. Waiter is junior. Paten is uninformed. Marrilee is not basilary. Marrilee is molar. Marrilee is swooning. Marrilee is uninformed. Marrilee is not junior. Marrilee is not remedial. Salomo is not basilary. Salomo is uninformed. Salomo is not conjoint. Salomo is junior. Salomo is remedial. If something is junior then it is molar. All molar things are swooning. Waiter is not molar.", "logic": "\nSwooning(waiter)\nConjoint(waiter)\nJunior(waiter)\nUninformed(paten)\nnot Basilary(marrilee)\nMolar(marrilee)\nSwooning(marrilee)\nUninformed(marrilee)\nnot Junior(marrilee)\nnot Remedial(marrilee)\nnot Basilary(salomo)\nUninformed(salomo)\nnot Conjoint(salomo)\nJunior(salomo)\nRemedial(salomo)\nforall x (Junior(x) -> Molar(x))\nforall x (Molar(x) -> Swooning(x))\n\nnot Molar(waiter)\n\nJunior(waiter) and forall x (Junior(x) -> Molar(x)) -> therefore Molar(waiter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Jarrett is mutative. Jarrett is sparkling. Jarrett is improvised. Anja is tarsal. Sterling is not russian. Sterling is itinerant. Sterling is mutative. Sterling is tarsal. Sterling is not improvised. Sterling is not brimming. Clayton is not russian. Clayton is tarsal. Clayton is not sparkling. Clayton is improvised. Clayton is brimming. If something is improvised then it is itinerant. All itinerant things are mutative. Clayton is mutative.", "logic": "\nMutative(jarrett)\nSparkling(jarrett)\nImprovised(jarrett)\nTarsal(anja)\nnot Russian(sterling)\nItinerant(sterling)\nMutative(sterling)\nTarsal(sterling)\nnot Improvised(sterling)\nnot Brimming(sterling)\nnot Russian(clayton)\nTarsal(clayton)\nnot Sparkling(clayton)\nImprovised(clayton)\nBrimming(clayton)\nforall x (Improvised(x) -> Itinerant(x))\nforall x (Itinerant(x) -> Mutative(x))\n\nMutative(clayton)\n\nImprovised(clayton) and forall x (Improvised(x) -> Itinerant(x)) -> therefore Itinerant(clayton) Itinerant(clayton) and forall x (Itinerant(x) -> Mutative(x)) -> therefore Mutative(clayton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Dacia is louvered. Dacia is adamant. Dacia is fruity. Stefa is naturistic. Gerri is not fattening. Gerri is moot. Gerri is louvered. Gerri is naturistic. Gerri is not fruity. Gerri is not carefree. Trev is not fattening. Trev is naturistic. Trev is not adamant. Trev is fruity. Trev is carefree. If something is fruity then it is moot. All moot things are louvered. Trev is not louvered.", "logic": "\nLouvered(dacia)\nAdamant(dacia)\nFruity(dacia)\nNaturistic(stefa)\nnot Fattening(gerri)\nMoot(gerri)\nLouvered(gerri)\nNaturistic(gerri)\nnot Fruity(gerri)\nnot Carefree(gerri)\nnot Fattening(trev)\nNaturistic(trev)\nnot Adamant(trev)\nFruity(trev)\nCarefree(trev)\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> Moot(x))\nforall x (Moot(x) -> Louvered(x))\n\nnot Louvered(trev)\n\nFruity(trev) and forall x (Fruity(x) -> Moot(x)) -> therefore Moot(trev) Moot(trev) and forall x (Moot(x) -> Louvered(x)) -> therefore Louvered(trev)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Bobine is underway. Bobine is bilateral. Bobine is unique. Ebenezer is languid. Charin is not equine. Charin is homophobic. Charin is underway. Charin is languid. Charin is not unique. Charin is not newfangled. Danie is not equine. Danie is languid. Danie is not bilateral. Danie is unique. Danie is newfangled. If something is unique then it is homophobic. All homophobic things are underway. Ebenezer is not underway.", "logic": "\nUnderway(bobine)\nBilateral(bobine)\nUnique(bobine)\nLanguid(ebenezer)\nnot Equine(charin)\nHomophobic(charin)\nUnderway(charin)\nLanguid(charin)\nnot Unique(charin)\nnot Newfangled(charin)\nnot Equine(danie)\nLanguid(danie)\nnot Bilateral(danie)\nUnique(danie)\nNewfangled(danie)\nforall x (Unique(x) -> Homophobic(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Underway(x))\n\nnot Underway(ebenezer)\n\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Underway(x)) <- forall x (Unique(x) -> Homophobic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Catriona is dense. Catriona is thorny. Catriona is unsweet. Vite is xlvii. Berty is not loaded. Berty is oxidative. Berty is dense. Berty is xlvii. Berty is not unsweet. Berty is not buteonine. Debee is not loaded. Debee is xlvii. Debee is not thorny. Debee is unsweet. Debee is buteonine. If something is unsweet then it is oxidative. All oxidative things are dense. Vite is oxidative.", "logic": "\nDense(catriona)\nThorny(catriona)\nUnsweet(catriona)\nXlvii(vite)\nnot Loaded(berty)\nOxidative(berty)\nDense(berty)\nXlvii(berty)\nnot Unsweet(berty)\nnot Buteonine(berty)\nnot Loaded(debee)\nXlvii(debee)\nnot Thorny(debee)\nUnsweet(debee)\nButeonine(debee)\nforall x (Unsweet(x) -> Oxidative(x))\nforall x (Oxidative(x) -> Dense(x))\n\nOxidative(vite)\n\nforall x (Unsweet(x) -> Oxidative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Kingston is panicled. Kingston is disturbed. Kingston is tractive. Harland is wakeless. Lonna is not unfertile. Lonna is refined. Lonna is panicled. Lonna is wakeless. Lonna is not tractive. Lonna is not suppliant. Giffy is not unfertile. Giffy is wakeless. Giffy is not disturbed. Giffy is tractive. Giffy is suppliant. If something is tractive then it is refined. All refined things are panicled. Harland is not unfertile.", "logic": "\nPanicled(kingston)\nDisturbed(kingston)\nTractive(kingston)\nWakeless(harland)\nnot Unfertile(lonna)\nRefined(lonna)\nPanicled(lonna)\nWakeless(lonna)\nnot Tractive(lonna)\nnot Suppliant(lonna)\nnot Unfertile(giffy)\nWakeless(giffy)\nnot Disturbed(giffy)\nTractive(giffy)\nSuppliant(giffy)\nforall x (Tractive(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Panicled(x))\n\nnot Unfertile(harland)\n\nnot Unfertile(harland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Tann is pretty. Tann is uncool. Tann is xlvi. Lyndon is unlikeable. Bogdan is not somnific. Bogdan is unlivable. Bogdan is pretty. Bogdan is unlikeable. Bogdan is not xlvi. Bogdan is not adient. Jilly is not somnific. Jilly is unlikeable. Jilly is not uncool. Jilly is xlvi. Jilly is adient. If something is xlvi then it is unlivable. All unlivable things are pretty. Lyndon is xlvi.", "logic": "\nPretty(tann)\nUncool(tann)\nXlvi(tann)\nUnlikeable(lyndon)\nnot Somnific(bogdan)\nUnlivable(bogdan)\nPretty(bogdan)\nUnlikeable(bogdan)\nnot Xlvi(bogdan)\nnot Adient(bogdan)\nnot Somnific(jilly)\nUnlikeable(jilly)\nnot Uncool(jilly)\nXlvi(jilly)\nAdient(jilly)\nforall x (Xlvi(x) -> Unlivable(x))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) -> Pretty(x))\n\nXlvi(lyndon)\n\nXlvi(lyndon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Malanie is uncurled. Malanie is apotropaic. Malanie is trillionth. Redmond is sensed. Doretta is not selective. Doretta is manichean. Doretta is uncurled. Doretta is sensed. Doretta is not trillionth. Doretta is not pinioned. Trina is not selective. Trina is sensed. Trina is not apotropaic. Trina is trillionth. Trina is pinioned. If something is trillionth then it is manichean. All manichean things are uncurled. Malanie is not sensed.", "logic": "\nUncurled(malanie)\nApotropaic(malanie)\nTrillionth(malanie)\nSensed(redmond)\nnot Selective(doretta)\nManichean(doretta)\nUncurled(doretta)\nSensed(doretta)\nnot Trillionth(doretta)\nnot Pinioned(doretta)\nnot Selective(trina)\nSensed(trina)\nnot Apotropaic(trina)\nTrillionth(trina)\nPinioned(trina)\nforall x (Trillionth(x) -> Manichean(x))\nforall x (Manichean(x) -> Uncurled(x))\n\nnot Sensed(malanie)\n\nnot Sensed(malanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "Kalle is tyrannical. Kalle is narcotized. Kalle is ferine. Eugen is illegible. Meira is not subscribed. Meira is phonic. Meira is tyrannical. Meira is illegible. Meira is not ferine. Meira is not successive. Bing is not subscribed. Bing is illegible. Bing is not narcotized. Bing is ferine. Bing is successive. If something is ferine then it is phonic. All phonic things are tyrannical. Eugen is narcotized.", "logic": "\nTyrannical(kalle)\nNarcotized(kalle)\nFerine(kalle)\nIllegible(eugen)\nnot Subscribed(meira)\nPhonic(meira)\nTyrannical(meira)\nIllegible(meira)\nnot Ferine(meira)\nnot Successive(meira)\nnot Subscribed(bing)\nIllegible(bing)\nnot Narcotized(bing)\nFerine(bing)\nSuccessive(bing)\nforall x (Ferine(x) -> Phonic(x))\nforall x (Phonic(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\n\nNarcotized(eugen)\n\nNarcotized(eugen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-8"} {"premises": "The suzy baronetize the barbi. The barbi is straplike. The grete follow the barbi. If someone tope the grete then the grete is straplike. Young people are straplike. All straplike, classy people are delusory. If someone is classy then they need the suzy. If someone follow the barbi then the barbi tope the grete. If someone follow the barbi then they are delusory. The barbi is straplike.", "logic": "\nBaronetize(suzy, barbi)\nStraplike(barbi)\nFollow(grete, barbi)\nforall x (Tope(x, grete) -> Straplike(grete))\nforall x (Classy(x) -> Straplike(x))\nforall x (Straplike(x) and Classy(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) -> Tope(x, suzy))\nforall x (Follow(x, barbi) -> Tope(barbi, grete))\nforall x (Follow(x, barbi) -> Delusory(x))\n\nStraplike(barbi)\n\ntherefore Straplike(barbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The matteo handwash the frederik. The frederik is prefrontal. The rod benday the frederik. If someone badmouth the rod then the rod is prefrontal. Young people are prefrontal. All prefrontal, boracic people are untrusting. If someone is boracic then they need the matteo. If someone benday the frederik then the frederik badmouth the rod. If someone benday the frederik then they are untrusting. The rod does not see the frederik.", "logic": "\nHandwash(matteo, frederik)\nPrefrontal(frederik)\nBenday(rod, frederik)\nforall x (Badmouth(x, rod) -> Prefrontal(rod))\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Prefrontal(x))\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) and Boracic(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Badmouth(x, matteo))\nforall x (Benday(x, frederik) -> Badmouth(frederik, rod))\nforall x (Benday(x, frederik) -> Untrusting(x))\n\nnot Benday(rod, frederik)\n\ntherefore Benday(rod, frederik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The hagan calve the andrej. The andrej is tramontane. The ariel stimulate the andrej. If someone coerce the ariel then the ariel is tramontane. Young people are tramontane. All tramontane, uneasy people are ingenious. If someone is uneasy then they need the hagan. If someone stimulate the andrej then the andrej coerce the ariel. If someone stimulate the andrej then they are ingenious. The ariel is ingenious.", "logic": "\nCalve(hagan, andrej)\nTramontane(andrej)\nStimulate(ariel, andrej)\nforall x (Coerce(x, ariel) -> Tramontane(ariel))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) and Uneasy(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Coerce(x, hagan))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, andrej) -> Coerce(andrej, ariel))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, andrej) -> Ingenious(x))\n\nIngenious(ariel)\n\nStimulate(ariel, andrej) and forall x (Stimulate(x, andrej) -> Ingenious(x)) -> therefore Ingenious(ariel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The wilton obsess the sarge. The sarge is conjugate. The glori cohabit the sarge. If someone mold the glori then the glori is conjugate. Young people are conjugate. All conjugate, narrowed people are irenic. If someone is narrowed then they need the wilton. If someone cohabit the sarge then the sarge mold the glori. If someone cohabit the sarge then they are irenic. The glori is not irenic.", "logic": "\nObsess(wilton, sarge)\nConjugate(sarge)\nCohabit(glori, sarge)\nforall x (Mold(x, glori) -> Conjugate(glori))\nforall x (Narrowed(x) -> Conjugate(x))\nforall x (Conjugate(x) and Narrowed(x) -> Irenic(x))\nforall x (Narrowed(x) -> Mold(x, wilton))\nforall x (Cohabit(x, sarge) -> Mold(sarge, glori))\nforall x (Cohabit(x, sarge) -> Irenic(x))\n\nnot Irenic(glori)\n\nCohabit(glori, sarge) and forall x (Cohabit(x, sarge) -> Irenic(x)) -> therefore Irenic(glori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The han evade the bennett. The bennett is overstated. The ruthe underquote the bennett. If someone dare the ruthe then the ruthe is overstated. Young people are overstated. All overstated, tubelike people are brooding. If someone is tubelike then they need the han. If someone underquote the bennett then the bennett dare the ruthe. If someone underquote the bennett then they are brooding. The ruthe is overstated.", "logic": "\nEvade(han, bennett)\nOverstated(bennett)\nUnderquote(ruthe, bennett)\nforall x (Dare(x, ruthe) -> Overstated(ruthe))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) -> Overstated(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) and Tubelike(x) -> Brooding(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) -> Dare(x, han))\nforall x (Underquote(x, bennett) -> Dare(bennett, ruthe))\nforall x (Underquote(x, bennett) -> Brooding(x))\n\nOverstated(ruthe)\n\nUnderquote(ruthe, bennett) and forall x (Underquote(x, bennett) -> Dare(bennett, ruthe)) -> therefore Dare(bennett, ruthe) Dare(bennett, ruthe) and forall x (Dare(x, ruthe) -> Overstated(ruthe)) -> therefore Overstated(ruthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The corly coddle the helen. The helen is defoliated. The margeaux sunder the helen. If someone clog the margeaux then the margeaux is defoliated. Young people are defoliated. All defoliated, partitive people are tympanic. If someone is partitive then they need the corly. If someone sunder the helen then the helen clog the margeaux. If someone sunder the helen then they are tympanic. The margeaux is not defoliated.", "logic": "\nCoddle(corly, helen)\nDefoliated(helen)\nSunder(margeaux, helen)\nforall x (Clog(x, margeaux) -> Defoliated(margeaux))\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Defoliated(x))\nforall x (Defoliated(x) and Partitive(x) -> Tympanic(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Clog(x, corly))\nforall x (Sunder(x, helen) -> Clog(helen, margeaux))\nforall x (Sunder(x, helen) -> Tympanic(x))\n\nnot Defoliated(margeaux)\n\nSunder(margeaux, helen) and forall x (Sunder(x, helen) -> Clog(helen, margeaux)) -> therefore Clog(helen, margeaux) Clog(helen, margeaux) and forall x (Clog(x, margeaux) -> Defoliated(margeaux)) -> therefore Defoliated(margeaux)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The dierdre scoop the broderick. The broderick is romansh. The denis scythe the broderick. If someone improve the denis then the denis is romansh. Young people are romansh. All romansh, crippled people are zoological. If someone is crippled then they need the dierdre. If someone scythe the broderick then the broderick improve the denis. If someone scythe the broderick then they are zoological. The dierdre is not romansh.", "logic": "\nScoop(dierdre, broderick)\nRomansh(broderick)\nScythe(denis, broderick)\nforall x (Improve(x, denis) -> Romansh(denis))\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Romansh(x) and Crippled(x) -> Zoological(x))\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Improve(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Scythe(x, broderick) -> Improve(broderick, denis))\nforall x (Scythe(x, broderick) -> Zoological(x))\n\nnot Romansh(dierdre)\n\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Romansh(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The hartley donate the petey. The petey is olden. The leonardo brevet the petey. If someone trust the leonardo then the leonardo is olden. Young people are olden. All olden, pearly people are vertical. If someone is pearly then they need the hartley. If someone brevet the petey then the petey trust the leonardo. If someone brevet the petey then they are vertical. The hartley trust the hartley.", "logic": "\nDonate(hartley, petey)\nOlden(petey)\nBrevet(leonardo, petey)\nforall x (Trust(x, leonardo) -> Olden(leonardo))\nforall x (Pearly(x) -> Olden(x))\nforall x (Olden(x) and Pearly(x) -> Vertical(x))\nforall x (Pearly(x) -> Trust(x, hartley))\nforall x (Brevet(x, petey) -> Trust(petey, leonardo))\nforall x (Brevet(x, petey) -> Vertical(x))\n\nTrust(hartley, hartley)\n\nforall x (Pearly(x) -> Trust(x, hartley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The phillipp unbosom the dudley. The dudley is strait. The rosalinde nobble the dudley. If someone want the rosalinde then the rosalinde is strait. Young people are strait. All strait, sold people are fantastic. If someone is sold then they need the phillipp. If someone nobble the dudley then the dudley want the rosalinde. If someone nobble the dudley then they are fantastic. The phillipp is not fantastic.", "logic": "\nUnbosom(phillipp, dudley)\nStrait(dudley)\nNobble(rosalinde, dudley)\nforall x (Want(x, rosalinde) -> Strait(rosalinde))\nforall x (Sold(x) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Strait(x) and Sold(x) -> Fantastic(x))\nforall x (Sold(x) -> Want(x, phillipp))\nforall x (Nobble(x, dudley) -> Want(dudley, rosalinde))\nforall x (Nobble(x, dudley) -> Fantastic(x))\n\nnot Fantastic(phillipp)\n\nforall x (Strait(x) and Sold(x) -> Fantastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The marlowe overlay the somerset. The somerset is astute. The andrzej desolate the somerset. If someone cuss the andrzej then the andrzej is astute. Young people are astute. All astute, carotid people are arbitrary. If someone is carotid then they need the marlowe. If someone desolate the somerset then the somerset cuss the andrzej. If someone desolate the somerset then they are arbitrary. The somerset desolate the somerset.", "logic": "\nOverlay(marlowe, somerset)\nAstute(somerset)\nDesolate(andrzej, somerset)\nforall x (Cuss(x, andrzej) -> Astute(andrzej))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> Astute(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) and Carotid(x) -> Arbitrary(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> Cuss(x, marlowe))\nforall x (Desolate(x, somerset) -> Cuss(somerset, andrzej))\nforall x (Desolate(x, somerset) -> Arbitrary(x))\n\nDesolate(somerset, somerset)\n\nDesolate(somerset, somerset) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The jonas backlash the nunzio. The nunzio is elementary. The katina dung the nunzio. If someone bunt the katina then the katina is elementary. Young people are elementary. All elementary, ample people are unclean. If someone is ample then they need the jonas. If someone dung the nunzio then the nunzio bunt the katina. If someone dung the nunzio then they are unclean. The katina is not ample.", "logic": "\nBacklash(jonas, nunzio)\nElementary(nunzio)\nDung(katina, nunzio)\nforall x (Bunt(x, katina) -> Elementary(katina))\nforall x (Ample(x) -> Elementary(x))\nforall x (Elementary(x) and Ample(x) -> Unclean(x))\nforall x (Ample(x) -> Bunt(x, jonas))\nforall x (Dung(x, nunzio) -> Bunt(nunzio, katina))\nforall x (Dung(x, nunzio) -> Unclean(x))\n\nnot Ample(katina)\n\nnot Ample(katina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "The arthur inhale the connie. The connie is slashing. The neil devolve the connie. If someone certify the neil then the neil is slashing. Young people are slashing. All slashing, oral people are wireless. If someone is oral then they need the arthur. If someone devolve the connie then the connie certify the neil. If someone devolve the connie then they are wireless. The arthur devolve the neil.", "logic": "\nInhale(arthur, connie)\nSlashing(connie)\nDevolve(neil, connie)\nforall x (Certify(x, neil) -> Slashing(neil))\nforall x (Oral(x) -> Slashing(x))\nforall x (Slashing(x) and Oral(x) -> Wireless(x))\nforall x (Oral(x) -> Certify(x, arthur))\nforall x (Devolve(x, connie) -> Certify(connie, neil))\nforall x (Devolve(x, connie) -> Wireless(x))\n\nDevolve(arthur, neil)\n\nDevolve(arthur, neil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Marchall is not healthy. Marchall is hitlerian. Marchall is unmingled. Nerty is unmingled. Verge is dirty. Verge is dangerous. Verge is unmingled. Eydie is not dirty. Eydie is hitlerian. Eydie is worldwide. If someone is healthy and dirty then they are hitlerian. Quiet, dangerous people are unmingled. All dangerous people are healthy. Verge is dirty.", "logic": "\nnot Healthy(marchall)\nHitlerian(marchall)\nUnmingled(marchall)\nUnmingled(nerty)\nDirty(verge)\nDangerous(verge)\nUnmingled(verge)\nnot Dirty(eydie)\nHitlerian(eydie)\nWorldwide(eydie)\nforall x (Healthy(x) and Dirty(x) -> Hitlerian(x))\nforall x (Healthy(x) and Dangerous(x) -> Unmingled(x))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) -> Healthy(x))\n\nDirty(verge)\n\ntherefore Dirty(verge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Eada is not antitoxic. Eada is blockish. Eada is spellbound. Eliot is spellbound. Mallissa is blastemic. Mallissa is handelian. Mallissa is spellbound. Vonni is not blastemic. Vonni is blockish. Vonni is jowly. If someone is antitoxic and blastemic then they are blockish. Quiet, handelian people are spellbound. All handelian people are antitoxic. Mallissa is not spellbound.", "logic": "\nnot Antitoxic(eada)\nBlockish(eada)\nSpellbound(eada)\nSpellbound(eliot)\nBlastemic(mallissa)\nHandelian(mallissa)\nSpellbound(mallissa)\nnot Blastemic(vonni)\nBlockish(vonni)\nJowly(vonni)\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) and Blastemic(x) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) and Handelian(x) -> Spellbound(x))\nforall x (Handelian(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\n\nnot Spellbound(mallissa)\n\ntherefore Spellbound(mallissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Kim is not slumbrous. Kim is rayless. Kim is brownish. Esmerelda is brownish. Viviana is hellenic. Viviana is nubby. Viviana is brownish. Norry is not hellenic. Norry is rayless. Norry is unending. If someone is slumbrous and hellenic then they are rayless. Quiet, nubby people are brownish. All nubby people are slumbrous. Viviana is slumbrous.", "logic": "\nnot Slumbrous(kim)\nRayless(kim)\nBrownish(kim)\nBrownish(esmerelda)\nHellenic(viviana)\nNubby(viviana)\nBrownish(viviana)\nnot Hellenic(norry)\nRayless(norry)\nUnending(norry)\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) and Hellenic(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) and Nubby(x) -> Brownish(x))\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Slumbrous(x))\n\nSlumbrous(viviana)\n\nNubby(viviana) and forall x (Nubby(x) -> Slumbrous(x)) -> therefore Slumbrous(viviana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Sidnee is not unusable. Sidnee is insanitary. Sidnee is parthian. Halvard is parthian. Nariko is spatulate. Nariko is taloned. Nariko is parthian. Fitz is not spatulate. Fitz is insanitary. Fitz is onstage. If someone is unusable and spatulate then they are insanitary. Quiet, taloned people are parthian. All taloned people are unusable. Nariko is not unusable.", "logic": "\nnot Unusable(sidnee)\nInsanitary(sidnee)\nParthian(sidnee)\nParthian(halvard)\nSpatulate(nariko)\nTaloned(nariko)\nParthian(nariko)\nnot Spatulate(fitz)\nInsanitary(fitz)\nOnstage(fitz)\nforall x (Unusable(x) and Spatulate(x) -> Insanitary(x))\nforall x (Unusable(x) and Taloned(x) -> Parthian(x))\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> Unusable(x))\n\nnot Unusable(nariko)\n\nTaloned(nariko) and forall x (Taloned(x) -> Unusable(x)) -> therefore Unusable(nariko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Hailee is not shriveled. Hailee is lapidary. Hailee is wireless. Tully is wireless. Editha is genic. Editha is purging. Editha is wireless. Jory is not genic. Jory is lapidary. Jory is narrowing. If someone is shriveled and genic then they are lapidary. Quiet, purging people are wireless. All purging people are shriveled. Editha is lapidary.", "logic": "\nnot Shriveled(hailee)\nLapidary(hailee)\nWireless(hailee)\nWireless(tully)\nGenic(editha)\nPurging(editha)\nWireless(editha)\nnot Genic(jory)\nLapidary(jory)\nNarrowing(jory)\nforall x (Shriveled(x) and Genic(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Shriveled(x) and Purging(x) -> Wireless(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Shriveled(x))\n\nLapidary(editha)\n\nPurging(editha) and forall x (Purging(x) -> Shriveled(x)) -> therefore Shriveled(editha) Shriveled(editha) and Genic(editha) and forall x (Shriveled(x) and Genic(x) -> Lapidary(x)) -> therefore Lapidary(editha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Raynor is not lacteal. Raynor is daedal. Raynor is dappled. Gilberte is dappled. Daisey is semiliquid. Daisey is principled. Daisey is dappled. Ardath is not semiliquid. Ardath is daedal. Ardath is unshaken. If someone is lacteal and semiliquid then they are daedal. Quiet, principled people are dappled. All principled people are lacteal. Daisey is not daedal.", "logic": "\nnot Lacteal(raynor)\nDaedal(raynor)\nDappled(raynor)\nDappled(gilberte)\nSemiliquid(daisey)\nPrincipled(daisey)\nDappled(daisey)\nnot Semiliquid(ardath)\nDaedal(ardath)\nUnshaken(ardath)\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Semiliquid(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Principled(x) -> Dappled(x))\nforall x (Principled(x) -> Lacteal(x))\n\nnot Daedal(daisey)\n\nPrincipled(daisey) and forall x (Principled(x) -> Lacteal(x)) -> therefore Lacteal(daisey) Lacteal(daisey) and Semiliquid(daisey) and forall x (Lacteal(x) and Semiliquid(x) -> Daedal(x)) -> therefore Daedal(daisey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Diamond is not prolusory. Diamond is electronic. Diamond is meek. Romeo is meek. Gilburt is romance. Gilburt is sneaking. Gilburt is meek. Gipsy is not romance. Gipsy is electronic. Gipsy is median. If someone is prolusory and romance then they are electronic. Quiet, sneaking people are meek. All sneaking people are prolusory. Gipsy is not prolusory.", "logic": "\nnot Prolusory(diamond)\nElectronic(diamond)\nMeek(diamond)\nMeek(romeo)\nRomance(gilburt)\nSneaking(gilburt)\nMeek(gilburt)\nnot Romance(gipsy)\nElectronic(gipsy)\nMedian(gipsy)\nforall x (Prolusory(x) and Romance(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Prolusory(x) and Sneaking(x) -> Meek(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Prolusory(x))\n\nnot Prolusory(gipsy)\n\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Prolusory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Jacques is not splayfoot. Jacques is proclaimed. Jacques is dreamy. Sydney is dreamy. Fletcher is pursy. Fletcher is mauritian. Fletcher is dreamy. Nicoli is not pursy. Nicoli is proclaimed. Nicoli is engaged. If someone is splayfoot and pursy then they are proclaimed. Quiet, mauritian people are dreamy. All mauritian people are splayfoot. Sydney is splayfoot.", "logic": "\nnot Splayfoot(jacques)\nProclaimed(jacques)\nDreamy(jacques)\nDreamy(sydney)\nPursy(fletcher)\nMauritian(fletcher)\nDreamy(fletcher)\nnot Pursy(nicoli)\nProclaimed(nicoli)\nEngaged(nicoli)\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Pursy(x) -> Proclaimed(x))\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Mauritian(x) -> Dreamy(x))\nforall x (Mauritian(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\n\nSplayfoot(sydney)\n\nforall x (Mauritian(x) -> Splayfoot(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Leela is not simian. Leela is engrossing. Leela is dinky. Grady is dinky. Tristan is acquainted. Tristan is hallowed. Tristan is dinky. Lita is not acquainted. Lita is engrossing. Lita is duckbill. If someone is simian and acquainted then they are engrossing. Quiet, hallowed people are dinky. All hallowed people are simian. Grady is not engrossing.", "logic": "\nnot Simian(leela)\nEngrossing(leela)\nDinky(leela)\nDinky(grady)\nAcquainted(tristan)\nHallowed(tristan)\nDinky(tristan)\nnot Acquainted(lita)\nEngrossing(lita)\nDuckbill(lita)\nforall x (Simian(x) and Acquainted(x) -> Engrossing(x))\nforall x (Simian(x) and Hallowed(x) -> Dinky(x))\nforall x (Hallowed(x) -> Simian(x))\n\nnot Engrossing(grady)\n\nforall x (Simian(x) and Acquainted(x) -> Engrossing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Henrieta is not wound. Henrieta is unreleased. Henrieta is webby. Cordelie is webby. Richie is riemannian. Richie is sulfurized. Richie is webby. Napoleon is not riemannian. Napoleon is unreleased. Napoleon is unselected. If someone is wound and riemannian then they are unreleased. Quiet, sulfurized people are webby. All sulfurized people are wound. Richie is unselected.", "logic": "\nnot Wound(henrieta)\nUnreleased(henrieta)\nWebby(henrieta)\nWebby(cordelie)\nRiemannian(richie)\nSulfurized(richie)\nWebby(richie)\nnot Riemannian(napoleon)\nUnreleased(napoleon)\nUnselected(napoleon)\nforall x (Wound(x) and Riemannian(x) -> Unreleased(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) and Sulfurized(x) -> Webby(x))\nforall x (Sulfurized(x) -> Wound(x))\n\nUnselected(richie)\n\nUnselected(richie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Isador is not egregious. Isador is auditory. Isador is sanctioned. Heidi is sanctioned. Odell is slovenian. Odell is male. Odell is sanctioned. Amelia is not slovenian. Amelia is auditory. Amelia is cismontane. If someone is egregious and slovenian then they are auditory. Quiet, male people are sanctioned. All male people are egregious. Odell is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Egregious(isador)\nAuditory(isador)\nSanctioned(isador)\nSanctioned(heidi)\nSlovenian(odell)\nMale(odell)\nSanctioned(odell)\nnot Slovenian(amelia)\nAuditory(amelia)\nCismontane(amelia)\nforall x (Egregious(x) and Slovenian(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Egregious(x) and Male(x) -> Sanctioned(x))\nforall x (Male(x) -> Egregious(x))\n\nnot Round(odell)\n\nnot Round(odell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Eadie is not neighborly. Eadie is charitable. Eadie is thrifty. Arther is thrifty. Herculie is synoicous. Herculie is firsthand. Herculie is thrifty. Debor is not synoicous. Debor is charitable. Debor is striate. If someone is neighborly and synoicous then they are charitable. Quiet, firsthand people are thrifty. All firsthand people are neighborly. Arther is striate.", "logic": "\nnot Neighborly(eadie)\nCharitable(eadie)\nThrifty(eadie)\nThrifty(arther)\nSynoicous(herculie)\nFirsthand(herculie)\nThrifty(herculie)\nnot Synoicous(debor)\nCharitable(debor)\nStriate(debor)\nforall x (Neighborly(x) and Synoicous(x) -> Charitable(x))\nforall x (Neighborly(x) and Firsthand(x) -> Thrifty(x))\nforall x (Firsthand(x) -> Neighborly(x))\n\nStriate(arther)\n\nStriate(arther) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1919"} {"premises": "Carilyn is gainly. Ginnie is edematous. Anastasia is edematous. If Ginnie is edematous then Ginnie is not curvaceous. If something is edematous and not curvaceous then it is plumaged. Carilyn is gainly.", "logic": "\nGainly(carilyn)\nEdematous(ginnie)\nEdematous(anastasia)\nEdematous(ginnie) -> not Curvaceous(ginnie)\nforall x (Edematous(x) and not Curvaceous(x) -> Plumaged(x))\n\nGainly(carilyn)\n\ntherefore Gainly(carilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Thaine is unruly. Jessa is pallid. Brigitta is pallid. If Jessa is pallid then Jessa is not potable. If something is pallid and not potable then it is unwary. Jessa is not pallid.", "logic": "\nUnruly(thaine)\nPallid(jessa)\nPallid(brigitta)\nPallid(jessa) -> not Potable(jessa)\nforall x (Pallid(x) and not Potable(x) -> Unwary(x))\n\nnot Pallid(jessa)\n\ntherefore Pallid(jessa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Stesha is uniform. Keslie is unrimed. Brittney is unrimed. If Keslie is unrimed then Keslie is not nettlesome. If something is unrimed and not nettlesome then it is osmotic. Keslie is not nettlesome.", "logic": "\nUniform(stesha)\nUnrimed(keslie)\nUnrimed(brittney)\nUnrimed(keslie) -> not Nettlesome(keslie)\nforall x (Unrimed(x) and not Nettlesome(x) -> Osmotic(x))\n\nnot Nettlesome(keslie)\n\nUnrimed(keslie) and Unrimed(keslie) -> not Nettlesome(keslie) -> therefore not Nettlesome(keslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Ajay is coccal. Norri is foliolate. Simonette is foliolate. If Norri is foliolate then Norri is not cuttable. If something is foliolate and not cuttable then it is live. Norri is cuttable.", "logic": "\nCoccal(ajay)\nFoliolate(norri)\nFoliolate(simonette)\nFoliolate(norri) -> not Cuttable(norri)\nforall x (Foliolate(x) and not Cuttable(x) -> Live(x))\n\nCuttable(norri)\n\nFoliolate(norri) and Foliolate(norri) -> not Cuttable(norri) -> therefore not Cuttable(norri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Terina is rhomboidal. Harlan is garbled. Dorry is garbled. If Harlan is garbled then Harlan is not ranging. If something is garbled and not ranging then it is shimmery. Harlan is shimmery.", "logic": "\nRhomboidal(terina)\nGarbled(harlan)\nGarbled(dorry)\nGarbled(harlan) -> not Ranging(harlan)\nforall x (Garbled(x) and not Ranging(x) -> Shimmery(x))\n\nShimmery(harlan)\n\nGarbled(harlan) and Garbled(harlan) -> not Ranging(harlan) -> therefore not Ranging(harlan) Garbled(harlan) and not Ranging(harlan) and forall x (Garbled(x) and not Ranging(x) -> Shimmery(x)) -> therefore Shimmery(harlan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Pamella is nonionized. Carmina is flameproof. Klara is flameproof. If Carmina is flameproof then Carmina is not dual. If something is flameproof and not dual then it is figurative. Carmina is not figurative.", "logic": "\nNonionized(pamella)\nFlameproof(carmina)\nFlameproof(klara)\nFlameproof(carmina) -> not Dual(carmina)\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and not Dual(x) -> Figurative(x))\n\nnot Figurative(carmina)\n\nFlameproof(carmina) and Flameproof(carmina) -> not Dual(carmina) -> therefore not Dual(carmina) Flameproof(carmina) and not Dual(carmina) and forall x (Flameproof(x) and not Dual(x) -> Figurative(x)) -> therefore Figurative(carmina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Barbra is argentous. Debora is zymotic. Cristabel is zymotic. If Debora is zymotic then Debora is not torturing. If something is zymotic and not torturing then it is taiwanese. Cristabel is not taiwanese.", "logic": "\nArgentous(barbra)\nZymotic(debora)\nZymotic(cristabel)\nZymotic(debora) -> not Torturing(debora)\nforall x (Zymotic(x) and not Torturing(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\n\nnot Taiwanese(cristabel)\n\nforall x (Zymotic(x) and not Torturing(x) -> Taiwanese(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Jaymee is innovative. Britani is vietnamese. Shumeet is vietnamese. If Britani is vietnamese then Britani is not growing. If something is vietnamese and not growing then it is unprompted. Jaymee is unprompted.", "logic": "\nInnovative(jaymee)\nVietnamese(britani)\nVietnamese(shumeet)\nVietnamese(britani) -> not Growing(britani)\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) and not Growing(x) -> Unprompted(x))\n\nUnprompted(jaymee)\n\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) and not Growing(x) -> Unprompted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Eugine is sorted. Marleen is resilient. Bari is resilient. If Marleen is resilient then Marleen is not corbelled. If something is resilient and not corbelled then it is ptolemaic. Bari is not furry.", "logic": "\nSorted(eugine)\nResilient(marleen)\nResilient(bari)\nResilient(marleen) -> not Corbelled(marleen)\nforall x (Resilient(x) and not Corbelled(x) -> Ptolemaic(x))\n\nnot Furry(bari)\n\nnot Furry(bari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Brody is buckram. Donni is attainable. Uriah is attainable. If Donni is attainable then Donni is not postural. If something is attainable and not postural then it is criminal. Donni is buckram.", "logic": "\nBuckram(brody)\nAttainable(donni)\nAttainable(uriah)\nAttainable(donni) -> not Postural(donni)\nforall x (Attainable(x) and not Postural(x) -> Criminal(x))\n\nBuckram(donni)\n\nBuckram(donni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Ethelbert is aggravated. Alene is animist. Godwin is animist. If Alene is animist then Alene is not potential. If something is animist and not potential then it is stagnant. Ethelbert is not potential.", "logic": "\nAggravated(ethelbert)\nAnimist(alene)\nAnimist(godwin)\nAnimist(alene) -> not Potential(alene)\nforall x (Animist(x) and not Potential(x) -> Stagnant(x))\n\nnot Potential(ethelbert)\n\nnot Potential(ethelbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Torrin is peroneal. Emelyne is brumous. Nelli is brumous. If Emelyne is brumous then Emelyne is not grasping. If something is brumous and not grasping then it is rude. Nelli is rough.", "logic": "\nPeroneal(torrin)\nBrumous(emelyne)\nBrumous(nelli)\nBrumous(emelyne) -> not Grasping(emelyne)\nforall x (Brumous(x) and not Grasping(x) -> Rude(x))\n\nRough(nelli)\n\nRough(nelli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Edy is unimproved. Edy is nautical. Edy is fortuitous. Edy is fistulate. Rabbi is unimproved. Rabbi is ulterior. Rabbi is nautical. Rabbi is not innate. Rabbi is fortuitous. Rabbi is fistulate. Rabbi is myelinated. Elvira is ulterior. Elvira is not nautical. Elvira is not innate. Elvira is myelinated. All innate, myelinated things are not unimproved. All myelinated, fortuitous things are fistulate. If something is ulterior and not myelinated then it is not nautical. If something is ulterior then it is fortuitous. If something is ulterior and not innate then it is fortuitous. If Edy is fistulate then Edy is unimproved. Rabbi is fistulate.", "logic": "\nUnimproved(edy)\nNautical(edy)\nFortuitous(edy)\nFistulate(edy)\nUnimproved(rabbi)\nUlterior(rabbi)\nNautical(rabbi)\nnot Innate(rabbi)\nFortuitous(rabbi)\nFistulate(rabbi)\nMyelinated(rabbi)\nUlterior(elvira)\nnot Nautical(elvira)\nnot Innate(elvira)\nMyelinated(elvira)\nforall x (Innate(x) and Myelinated(x) -> not Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and Fortuitous(x) -> Fistulate(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and not Myelinated(x) -> not Nautical(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and not Innate(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nFistulate(edy) -> Unimproved(edy)\n\nFistulate(rabbi)\n\ntherefore Fistulate(rabbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Benji is sullen. Benji is unlit. Benji is pebbly. Benji is squandered. Randene is sullen. Randene is infected. Randene is unlit. Randene is not ascetic. Randene is pebbly. Randene is squandered. Randene is unstressed. Vivianne is infected. Vivianne is not unlit. Vivianne is not ascetic. Vivianne is unstressed. All ascetic, unstressed things are not sullen. All unstressed, pebbly things are squandered. If something is infected and not unstressed then it is not unlit. If something is infected then it is pebbly. If something is infected and not ascetic then it is pebbly. If Benji is squandered then Benji is sullen. Benji is not sullen.", "logic": "\nSullen(benji)\nUnlit(benji)\nPebbly(benji)\nSquandered(benji)\nSullen(randene)\nInfected(randene)\nUnlit(randene)\nnot Ascetic(randene)\nPebbly(randene)\nSquandered(randene)\nUnstressed(randene)\nInfected(vivianne)\nnot Unlit(vivianne)\nnot Ascetic(vivianne)\nUnstressed(vivianne)\nforall x (Ascetic(x) and Unstressed(x) -> not Sullen(x))\nforall x (Unstressed(x) and Pebbly(x) -> Squandered(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) and not Unstressed(x) -> not Unlit(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) and not Ascetic(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nSquandered(benji) -> Sullen(benji)\n\nnot Sullen(benji)\n\ntherefore Sullen(benji)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Emelia is foiled. Emelia is ungathered. Emelia is florid. Emelia is stark. Alicia is foiled. Alicia is gone. Alicia is ungathered. Alicia is not monastical. Alicia is florid. Alicia is stark. Alicia is glistening. Cynthea is gone. Cynthea is not ungathered. Cynthea is not monastical. Cynthea is glistening. All monastical, glistening things are not foiled. All glistening, florid things are stark. If something is gone and not glistening then it is not ungathered. If something is gone then it is florid. If something is gone and not monastical then it is florid. If Emelia is stark then Emelia is foiled. Cynthea is florid.", "logic": "\nFoiled(emelia)\nUngathered(emelia)\nFlorid(emelia)\nStark(emelia)\nFoiled(alicia)\nGone(alicia)\nUngathered(alicia)\nnot Monastical(alicia)\nFlorid(alicia)\nStark(alicia)\nGlistening(alicia)\nGone(cynthea)\nnot Ungathered(cynthea)\nnot Monastical(cynthea)\nGlistening(cynthea)\nforall x (Monastical(x) and Glistening(x) -> not Foiled(x))\nforall x (Glistening(x) and Florid(x) -> Stark(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) and not Glistening(x) -> not Ungathered(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Florid(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) and not Monastical(x) -> Florid(x))\nStark(emelia) -> Foiled(emelia)\n\nFlorid(cynthea)\n\nGone(cynthea) and forall x (Gone(x) -> Florid(x)) -> therefore Florid(cynthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Willis is betrothed. Willis is coherent. Willis is apogean. Willis is divalent. Waylen is betrothed. Waylen is impetuous. Waylen is coherent. Waylen is not zygotic. Waylen is apogean. Waylen is divalent. Waylen is chafflike. Alys is impetuous. Alys is not coherent. Alys is not zygotic. Alys is chafflike. All zygotic, chafflike things are not betrothed. All chafflike, apogean things are divalent. If something is impetuous and not chafflike then it is not coherent. If something is impetuous then it is apogean. If something is impetuous and not zygotic then it is apogean. If Willis is divalent then Willis is betrothed. Alys is not apogean.", "logic": "\nBetrothed(willis)\nCoherent(willis)\nApogean(willis)\nDivalent(willis)\nBetrothed(waylen)\nImpetuous(waylen)\nCoherent(waylen)\nnot Zygotic(waylen)\nApogean(waylen)\nDivalent(waylen)\nChafflike(waylen)\nImpetuous(alys)\nnot Coherent(alys)\nnot Zygotic(alys)\nChafflike(alys)\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and Chafflike(x) -> not Betrothed(x))\nforall x (Chafflike(x) and Apogean(x) -> Divalent(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and not Chafflike(x) -> not Coherent(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) -> Apogean(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and not Zygotic(x) -> Apogean(x))\nDivalent(willis) -> Betrothed(willis)\n\nnot Apogean(alys)\n\nImpetuous(alys) and forall x (Impetuous(x) -> Apogean(x)) -> therefore Apogean(alys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Nevil is lxxxvi. Nevil is unhoped. Nevil is flattering. Nevil is rainless. Lesya is lxxxvi. Lesya is known. Lesya is unhoped. Lesya is not astounded. Lesya is flattering. Lesya is rainless. Lesya is doped. Rolfe is known. Rolfe is not unhoped. Rolfe is not astounded. Rolfe is doped. All astounded, doped things are not lxxxvi. All doped, flattering things are rainless. If something is known and not doped then it is not unhoped. If something is known then it is flattering. If something is known and not astounded then it is flattering. If Nevil is rainless then Nevil is lxxxvi. Rolfe is rainless.", "logic": "\nLxxxvi(nevil)\nUnhoped(nevil)\nFlattering(nevil)\nRainless(nevil)\nLxxxvi(lesya)\nKnown(lesya)\nUnhoped(lesya)\nnot Astounded(lesya)\nFlattering(lesya)\nRainless(lesya)\nDoped(lesya)\nKnown(rolfe)\nnot Unhoped(rolfe)\nnot Astounded(rolfe)\nDoped(rolfe)\nforall x (Astounded(x) and Doped(x) -> not Lxxxvi(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) and Flattering(x) -> Rainless(x))\nforall x (Known(x) and not Doped(x) -> not Unhoped(x))\nforall x (Known(x) -> Flattering(x))\nforall x (Known(x) and not Astounded(x) -> Flattering(x))\nRainless(nevil) -> Lxxxvi(nevil)\n\nRainless(rolfe)\n\nKnown(rolfe) and forall x (Known(x) -> Flattering(x)) -> therefore Flattering(rolfe) Doped(rolfe) and Flattering(rolfe) and forall x (Doped(x) and Flattering(x) -> Rainless(x)) -> therefore Rainless(rolfe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Archon is undimmed. Archon is tumid. Archon is queer. Archon is technical. Maddi is undimmed. Maddi is exulting. Maddi is tumid. Maddi is not unnameable. Maddi is queer. Maddi is technical. Maddi is shuddery. Mel is exulting. Mel is not tumid. Mel is not unnameable. Mel is shuddery. All unnameable, shuddery things are not undimmed. All shuddery, queer things are technical. If something is exulting and not shuddery then it is not tumid. If something is exulting then it is queer. If something is exulting and not unnameable then it is queer. If Archon is technical then Archon is undimmed. Mel is not technical.", "logic": "\nUndimmed(archon)\nTumid(archon)\nQueer(archon)\nTechnical(archon)\nUndimmed(maddi)\nExulting(maddi)\nTumid(maddi)\nnot Unnameable(maddi)\nQueer(maddi)\nTechnical(maddi)\nShuddery(maddi)\nExulting(mel)\nnot Tumid(mel)\nnot Unnameable(mel)\nShuddery(mel)\nforall x (Unnameable(x) and Shuddery(x) -> not Undimmed(x))\nforall x (Shuddery(x) and Queer(x) -> Technical(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) and not Shuddery(x) -> not Tumid(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Queer(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) and not Unnameable(x) -> Queer(x))\nTechnical(archon) -> Undimmed(archon)\n\nnot Technical(mel)\n\nExulting(mel) and forall x (Exulting(x) -> Queer(x)) -> therefore Queer(mel) Shuddery(mel) and Queer(mel) and forall x (Shuddery(x) and Queer(x) -> Technical(x)) -> therefore Technical(mel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Kin is nervy. Kin is potbound. Kin is sore. Kin is duplex. Tana is nervy. Tana is unlittered. Tana is potbound. Tana is not proto. Tana is sore. Tana is duplex. Tana is leftish. Luci is unlittered. Luci is not potbound. Luci is not proto. Luci is leftish. All proto, leftish things are not nervy. All leftish, sore things are duplex. If something is unlittered and not leftish then it is not potbound. If something is unlittered then it is sore. If something is unlittered and not proto then it is sore. If Kin is duplex then Kin is nervy. Kin is not proto.", "logic": "\nNervy(kin)\nPotbound(kin)\nSore(kin)\nDuplex(kin)\nNervy(tana)\nUnlittered(tana)\nPotbound(tana)\nnot Proto(tana)\nSore(tana)\nDuplex(tana)\nLeftish(tana)\nUnlittered(luci)\nnot Potbound(luci)\nnot Proto(luci)\nLeftish(luci)\nforall x (Proto(x) and Leftish(x) -> not Nervy(x))\nforall x (Leftish(x) and Sore(x) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Unlittered(x) and not Leftish(x) -> not Potbound(x))\nforall x (Unlittered(x) -> Sore(x))\nforall x (Unlittered(x) and not Proto(x) -> Sore(x))\nDuplex(kin) -> Nervy(kin)\n\nnot Proto(kin)\n\nnot Proto(kin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Efram is niffy. Efram is nonspatial. Efram is septrional. Efram is soporific. Chloette is niffy. Chloette is uncrannied. Chloette is nonspatial. Chloette is not still. Chloette is septrional. Chloette is soporific. Chloette is believable. Arvind is uncrannied. Arvind is not nonspatial. Arvind is not still. Arvind is believable. All still, believable things are not niffy. All believable, septrional things are soporific. If something is uncrannied and not believable then it is not nonspatial. If something is uncrannied then it is septrional. If something is uncrannied and not still then it is septrional. If Efram is soporific then Efram is niffy. Arvind is niffy.", "logic": "\nNiffy(efram)\nNonspatial(efram)\nSeptrional(efram)\nSoporific(efram)\nNiffy(chloette)\nUncrannied(chloette)\nNonspatial(chloette)\nnot Still(chloette)\nSeptrional(chloette)\nSoporific(chloette)\nBelievable(chloette)\nUncrannied(arvind)\nnot Nonspatial(arvind)\nnot Still(arvind)\nBelievable(arvind)\nforall x (Still(x) and Believable(x) -> not Niffy(x))\nforall x (Believable(x) and Septrional(x) -> Soporific(x))\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) and not Believable(x) -> not Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) -> Septrional(x))\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) and not Still(x) -> Septrional(x))\nSoporific(efram) -> Niffy(efram)\n\nNiffy(arvind)\n\nNiffy(arvind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Kirk is profane. Kirk is migrant. Kirk is lopsided. Kirk is bleached. Leiah is profane. Leiah is burled. Leiah is migrant. Leiah is not balsamic. Leiah is lopsided. Leiah is bleached. Leiah is hoarse. Filip is burled. Filip is not migrant. Filip is not balsamic. Filip is hoarse. All balsamic, hoarse things are not profane. All hoarse, lopsided things are bleached. If something is burled and not hoarse then it is not migrant. If something is burled then it is lopsided. If something is burled and not balsamic then it is lopsided. If Kirk is bleached then Kirk is profane. Kirk is not hoarse.", "logic": "\nProfane(kirk)\nMigrant(kirk)\nLopsided(kirk)\nBleached(kirk)\nProfane(leiah)\nBurled(leiah)\nMigrant(leiah)\nnot Balsamic(leiah)\nLopsided(leiah)\nBleached(leiah)\nHoarse(leiah)\nBurled(filip)\nnot Migrant(filip)\nnot Balsamic(filip)\nHoarse(filip)\nforall x (Balsamic(x) and Hoarse(x) -> not Profane(x))\nforall x (Hoarse(x) and Lopsided(x) -> Bleached(x))\nforall x (Burled(x) and not Hoarse(x) -> not Migrant(x))\nforall x (Burled(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Burled(x) and not Balsamic(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nBleached(kirk) -> Profane(kirk)\n\nnot Hoarse(kirk)\n\nnot Hoarse(kirk) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "Heywood is alloyed. Heywood is diminished. Heywood is tectonic. Heywood is ulcerative. Amory is alloyed. Amory is cespitose. Amory is diminished. Amory is not huffish. Amory is tectonic. Amory is ulcerative. Amory is deniable. Clarissa is cespitose. Clarissa is not diminished. Clarissa is not huffish. Clarissa is deniable. All huffish, deniable things are not alloyed. All deniable, tectonic things are ulcerative. If something is cespitose and not deniable then it is not diminished. If something is cespitose then it is tectonic. If something is cespitose and not huffish then it is tectonic. If Heywood is ulcerative then Heywood is alloyed. Heywood is cespitose.", "logic": "\nAlloyed(heywood)\nDiminished(heywood)\nTectonic(heywood)\nUlcerative(heywood)\nAlloyed(amory)\nCespitose(amory)\nDiminished(amory)\nnot Huffish(amory)\nTectonic(amory)\nUlcerative(amory)\nDeniable(amory)\nCespitose(clarissa)\nnot Diminished(clarissa)\nnot Huffish(clarissa)\nDeniable(clarissa)\nforall x (Huffish(x) and Deniable(x) -> not Alloyed(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) and Tectonic(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Cespitose(x) and not Deniable(x) -> not Diminished(x))\nforall x (Cespitose(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Cespitose(x) and not Huffish(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nUlcerative(heywood) -> Alloyed(heywood)\n\nCespitose(heywood)\n\nCespitose(heywood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2092"} {"premises": "The wendall peruse the kaylil. The wendall is mesolithic. The wendall is nigh. The wendall raft the kaylil. The kaylil peruse the wendall. The kaylil is scratchy. The kaylil is mesolithic. The kaylil is not scared. The kaylil is argive. The kaylil is nigh. The kaylil raft the wendall. The kaylil quote the wendall. Red things are argive. If the kaylil quote the wendall then the kaylil raft the wendall. If something peruse the kaylil and it is argive then it quote the kaylil. If something is scratchy and it raft the wendall then it quote the kaylil. If the kaylil is not nigh then the kaylil quote the wendall. If something raft the wendall then it quote the wendall. The wendall is nigh.", "logic": "\nPeruse(wendall, kaylil)\nMesolithic(wendall)\nNigh(wendall)\nRaft(wendall, kaylil)\nPeruse(kaylil, wendall)\nScratchy(kaylil)\nMesolithic(kaylil)\nnot Scared(kaylil)\nArgive(kaylil)\nNigh(kaylil)\nRaft(kaylil, wendall)\nQuote(kaylil, wendall)\nforall x (Nigh(x) -> Argive(x))\nQuote(kaylil, wendall) -> Raft(kaylil, wendall)\nforall x (Peruse(x, kaylil) and Argive(x) -> Quote(x, kaylil))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Raft(x, wendall) -> Quote(x, kaylil))\nnot Nigh(kaylil) -> Quote(kaylil, wendall)\nforall x (Raft(x, wendall) -> Quote(x, wendall))\n\nNigh(wendall)\n\ntherefore Nigh(wendall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The stephan whisker the giorgio. The stephan is unswayed. The stephan is shadowy. The stephan shepherd the giorgio. The giorgio whisker the stephan. The giorgio is definite. The giorgio is unswayed. The giorgio is not confirming. The giorgio is later. The giorgio is shadowy. The giorgio shepherd the stephan. The giorgio unfreeze the stephan. Red things are later. If the giorgio unfreeze the stephan then the giorgio shepherd the stephan. If something whisker the giorgio and it is later then it unfreeze the giorgio. If something is definite and it shepherd the stephan then it unfreeze the giorgio. If the giorgio is not shadowy then the giorgio unfreeze the stephan. If something shepherd the stephan then it unfreeze the stephan. The giorgio is confirming.", "logic": "\nWhisker(stephan, giorgio)\nUnswayed(stephan)\nShadowy(stephan)\nShepherd(stephan, giorgio)\nWhisker(giorgio, stephan)\nDefinite(giorgio)\nUnswayed(giorgio)\nnot Confirming(giorgio)\nLater(giorgio)\nShadowy(giorgio)\nShepherd(giorgio, stephan)\nUnfreeze(giorgio, stephan)\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Later(x))\nUnfreeze(giorgio, stephan) -> Shepherd(giorgio, stephan)\nforall x (Whisker(x, giorgio) and Later(x) -> Unfreeze(x, giorgio))\nforall x (Definite(x) and Shepherd(x, stephan) -> Unfreeze(x, giorgio))\nnot Shadowy(giorgio) -> Unfreeze(giorgio, stephan)\nforall x (Shepherd(x, stephan) -> Unfreeze(x, stephan))\n\nConfirming(giorgio)\n\ntherefore not Confirming(giorgio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The suzzy piffle the griswold. The suzzy is violative. The suzzy is unsigned. The suzzy chafe the griswold. The griswold piffle the suzzy. The griswold is treelike. The griswold is violative. The griswold is not laotian. The griswold is quaternate. The griswold is unsigned. The griswold chafe the suzzy. The griswold jockey the suzzy. Red things are quaternate. If the griswold jockey the suzzy then the griswold chafe the suzzy. If something piffle the griswold and it is quaternate then it jockey the griswold. If something is treelike and it chafe the suzzy then it jockey the griswold. If the griswold is not unsigned then the griswold jockey the suzzy. If something chafe the suzzy then it jockey the suzzy. The griswold jockey the griswold.", "logic": "\nPiffle(suzzy, griswold)\nViolative(suzzy)\nUnsigned(suzzy)\nChafe(suzzy, griswold)\nPiffle(griswold, suzzy)\nTreelike(griswold)\nViolative(griswold)\nnot Laotian(griswold)\nQuaternate(griswold)\nUnsigned(griswold)\nChafe(griswold, suzzy)\nJockey(griswold, suzzy)\nforall x (Unsigned(x) -> Quaternate(x))\nJockey(griswold, suzzy) -> Chafe(griswold, suzzy)\nforall x (Piffle(x, griswold) and Quaternate(x) -> Jockey(x, griswold))\nforall x (Treelike(x) and Chafe(x, suzzy) -> Jockey(x, griswold))\nnot Unsigned(griswold) -> Jockey(griswold, suzzy)\nforall x (Chafe(x, suzzy) -> Jockey(x, suzzy))\n\nJockey(griswold, griswold)\n\nTreelike(griswold) and Chafe(griswold, suzzy) and forall x (Treelike(x) and Chafe(x, suzzy) -> Jockey(x, griswold)) -> therefore Jockey(griswold, griswold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The etheline inmarry the sharlene. The etheline is unforeseen. The etheline is nauruan. The etheline live the sharlene. The sharlene inmarry the etheline. The sharlene is broadloom. The sharlene is unforeseen. The sharlene is not penal. The sharlene is humped. The sharlene is nauruan. The sharlene live the etheline. The sharlene esteem the etheline. Red things are humped. If the sharlene esteem the etheline then the sharlene live the etheline. If something inmarry the sharlene and it is humped then it esteem the sharlene. If something is broadloom and it live the etheline then it esteem the sharlene. If the sharlene is not nauruan then the sharlene esteem the etheline. If something live the etheline then it esteem the etheline. The sharlene does not see the sharlene.", "logic": "\nInmarry(etheline, sharlene)\nUnforeseen(etheline)\nNauruan(etheline)\nLive(etheline, sharlene)\nInmarry(sharlene, etheline)\nBroadloom(sharlene)\nUnforeseen(sharlene)\nnot Penal(sharlene)\nHumped(sharlene)\nNauruan(sharlene)\nLive(sharlene, etheline)\nEsteem(sharlene, etheline)\nforall x (Nauruan(x) -> Humped(x))\nEsteem(sharlene, etheline) -> Live(sharlene, etheline)\nforall x (Inmarry(x, sharlene) and Humped(x) -> Esteem(x, sharlene))\nforall x (Broadloom(x) and Live(x, etheline) -> Esteem(x, sharlene))\nnot Nauruan(sharlene) -> Esteem(sharlene, etheline)\nforall x (Live(x, etheline) -> Esteem(x, etheline))\n\nnot Esteem(sharlene, sharlene)\n\nBroadloom(sharlene) and Live(sharlene, etheline) and forall x (Broadloom(x) and Live(x, etheline) -> Esteem(x, sharlene)) -> therefore Esteem(sharlene, sharlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The lorri hike the barb. The lorri is placental. The lorri is movable. The lorri exhibit the barb. The barb hike the lorri. The barb is ophthalmic. The barb is placental. The barb is not blimpish. The barb is jingly. The barb is movable. The barb exhibit the lorri. The barb overreact the lorri. Red things are jingly. If the barb overreact the lorri then the barb exhibit the lorri. If something hike the barb and it is jingly then it overreact the barb. If something is ophthalmic and it exhibit the lorri then it overreact the barb. If the barb is not movable then the barb overreact the lorri. If something exhibit the lorri then it overreact the lorri. The lorri overreact the barb.", "logic": "\nHike(lorri, barb)\nPlacental(lorri)\nMovable(lorri)\nExhibit(lorri, barb)\nHike(barb, lorri)\nOphthalmic(barb)\nPlacental(barb)\nnot Blimpish(barb)\nJingly(barb)\nMovable(barb)\nExhibit(barb, lorri)\nOverreact(barb, lorri)\nforall x (Movable(x) -> Jingly(x))\nOverreact(barb, lorri) -> Exhibit(barb, lorri)\nforall x (Hike(x, barb) and Jingly(x) -> Overreact(x, barb))\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) and Exhibit(x, lorri) -> Overreact(x, barb))\nnot Movable(barb) -> Overreact(barb, lorri)\nforall x (Exhibit(x, lorri) -> Overreact(x, lorri))\n\nOverreact(lorri, barb)\n\nMovable(lorri) and forall x (Movable(x) -> Jingly(x)) -> therefore Jingly(lorri) Hike(lorri, barb) and Jingly(lorri) and forall x (Hike(x, barb) and Jingly(x) -> Overreact(x, barb)) -> therefore Overreact(lorri, barb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The brunella enumerate the minda. The brunella is nosey. The brunella is annexal. The brunella crepitate the minda. The minda enumerate the brunella. The minda is untrimmed. The minda is nosey. The minda is not meshuga. The minda is glial. The minda is annexal. The minda crepitate the brunella. The minda escalate the brunella. Red things are glial. If the minda escalate the brunella then the minda crepitate the brunella. If something enumerate the minda and it is glial then it escalate the minda. If something is untrimmed and it crepitate the brunella then it escalate the minda. If the minda is not annexal then the minda escalate the brunella. If something crepitate the brunella then it escalate the brunella. The brunella does not see the minda.", "logic": "\nEnumerate(brunella, minda)\nNosey(brunella)\nAnnexal(brunella)\nCrepitate(brunella, minda)\nEnumerate(minda, brunella)\nUntrimmed(minda)\nNosey(minda)\nnot Meshuga(minda)\nGlial(minda)\nAnnexal(minda)\nCrepitate(minda, brunella)\nEscalate(minda, brunella)\nforall x (Annexal(x) -> Glial(x))\nEscalate(minda, brunella) -> Crepitate(minda, brunella)\nforall x (Enumerate(x, minda) and Glial(x) -> Escalate(x, minda))\nforall x (Untrimmed(x) and Crepitate(x, brunella) -> Escalate(x, minda))\nnot Annexal(minda) -> Escalate(minda, brunella)\nforall x (Crepitate(x, brunella) -> Escalate(x, brunella))\n\nnot Escalate(brunella, minda)\n\nAnnexal(brunella) and forall x (Annexal(x) -> Glial(x)) -> therefore Glial(brunella) Enumerate(brunella, minda) and Glial(brunella) and forall x (Enumerate(x, minda) and Glial(x) -> Escalate(x, minda)) -> therefore Escalate(brunella, minda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The ramonda pule the trisha. The ramonda is disgraced. The ramonda is tonsorial. The ramonda higgle the trisha. The trisha pule the ramonda. The trisha is annular. The trisha is disgraced. The trisha is not cloudless. The trisha is stoical. The trisha is tonsorial. The trisha higgle the ramonda. The trisha galvanize the ramonda. Red things are stoical. If the trisha galvanize the ramonda then the trisha higgle the ramonda. If something pule the trisha and it is stoical then it galvanize the trisha. If something is annular and it higgle the ramonda then it galvanize the trisha. If the trisha is not tonsorial then the trisha galvanize the ramonda. If something higgle the ramonda then it galvanize the ramonda. The ramonda does not see the ramonda.", "logic": "\nPule(ramonda, trisha)\nDisgraced(ramonda)\nTonsorial(ramonda)\nHiggle(ramonda, trisha)\nPule(trisha, ramonda)\nAnnular(trisha)\nDisgraced(trisha)\nnot Cloudless(trisha)\nStoical(trisha)\nTonsorial(trisha)\nHiggle(trisha, ramonda)\nGalvanize(trisha, ramonda)\nforall x (Tonsorial(x) -> Stoical(x))\nGalvanize(trisha, ramonda) -> Higgle(trisha, ramonda)\nforall x (Pule(x, trisha) and Stoical(x) -> Galvanize(x, trisha))\nforall x (Annular(x) and Higgle(x, ramonda) -> Galvanize(x, trisha))\nnot Tonsorial(trisha) -> Galvanize(trisha, ramonda)\nforall x (Higgle(x, ramonda) -> Galvanize(x, ramonda))\n\nnot Galvanize(ramonda, ramonda)\n\nforall x (Higgle(x, ramonda) -> Galvanize(x, ramonda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The ansel iodise the dotty. The ansel is cheap. The ansel is pyramidal. The ansel deterge the dotty. The dotty iodise the ansel. The dotty is jain. The dotty is cheap. The dotty is not compatible. The dotty is ruandan. The dotty is pyramidal. The dotty deterge the ansel. The dotty bound the ansel. Red things are ruandan. If the dotty bound the ansel then the dotty deterge the ansel. If something iodise the dotty and it is ruandan then it bound the dotty. If something is jain and it deterge the ansel then it bound the dotty. If the dotty is not pyramidal then the dotty bound the ansel. If something deterge the ansel then it bound the ansel. The ansel is compatible.", "logic": "\nIodise(ansel, dotty)\nCheap(ansel)\nPyramidal(ansel)\nDeterge(ansel, dotty)\nIodise(dotty, ansel)\nJain(dotty)\nCheap(dotty)\nnot Compatible(dotty)\nRuandan(dotty)\nPyramidal(dotty)\nDeterge(dotty, ansel)\nBound(dotty, ansel)\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) -> Ruandan(x))\nBound(dotty, ansel) -> Deterge(dotty, ansel)\nforall x (Iodise(x, dotty) and Ruandan(x) -> Bound(x, dotty))\nforall x (Jain(x) and Deterge(x, ansel) -> Bound(x, dotty))\nnot Pyramidal(dotty) -> Bound(dotty, ansel)\nforall x (Deterge(x, ansel) -> Bound(x, ansel))\n\nCompatible(ansel)\n\nCompatible(ansel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The apostolos becloud the frederic. The apostolos is russian. The apostolos is overproud. The apostolos uprise the frederic. The frederic becloud the apostolos. The frederic is rusted. The frederic is russian. The frederic is not tonal. The frederic is pasteurian. The frederic is overproud. The frederic uprise the apostolos. The frederic menace the apostolos. Red things are pasteurian. If the frederic menace the apostolos then the frederic uprise the apostolos. If something becloud the frederic and it is pasteurian then it menace the frederic. If something is rusted and it uprise the apostolos then it menace the frederic. If the frederic is not overproud then the frederic menace the apostolos. If something uprise the apostolos then it menace the apostolos. The apostolos does not eat the apostolos.", "logic": "\nBecloud(apostolos, frederic)\nRussian(apostolos)\nOverproud(apostolos)\nUprise(apostolos, frederic)\nBecloud(frederic, apostolos)\nRusted(frederic)\nRussian(frederic)\nnot Tonal(frederic)\nPasteurian(frederic)\nOverproud(frederic)\nUprise(frederic, apostolos)\nMenace(frederic, apostolos)\nforall x (Overproud(x) -> Pasteurian(x))\nMenace(frederic, apostolos) -> Uprise(frederic, apostolos)\nforall x (Becloud(x, frederic) and Pasteurian(x) -> Menace(x, frederic))\nforall x (Rusted(x) and Uprise(x, apostolos) -> Menace(x, frederic))\nnot Overproud(frederic) -> Menace(frederic, apostolos)\nforall x (Uprise(x, apostolos) -> Menace(x, apostolos))\n\nnot Becloud(apostolos, apostolos)\n\nnot Becloud(apostolos, apostolos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The sibbie insolate the sileas. The sibbie is noduled. The sibbie is operculate. The sibbie macerate the sileas. The sileas insolate the sibbie. The sileas is vicennial. The sileas is noduled. The sileas is not antiblack. The sileas is skillful. The sileas is operculate. The sileas macerate the sibbie. The sileas laze the sibbie. Red things are skillful. If the sileas laze the sibbie then the sileas macerate the sibbie. If something insolate the sileas and it is skillful then it laze the sileas. If something is vicennial and it macerate the sibbie then it laze the sileas. If the sileas is not operculate then the sileas laze the sibbie. If something macerate the sibbie then it laze the sibbie. The sileas insolate the sileas.", "logic": "\nInsolate(sibbie, sileas)\nNoduled(sibbie)\nOperculate(sibbie)\nMacerate(sibbie, sileas)\nInsolate(sileas, sibbie)\nVicennial(sileas)\nNoduled(sileas)\nnot Antiblack(sileas)\nSkillful(sileas)\nOperculate(sileas)\nMacerate(sileas, sibbie)\nLaze(sileas, sibbie)\nforall x (Operculate(x) -> Skillful(x))\nLaze(sileas, sibbie) -> Macerate(sileas, sibbie)\nforall x (Insolate(x, sileas) and Skillful(x) -> Laze(x, sileas))\nforall x (Vicennial(x) and Macerate(x, sibbie) -> Laze(x, sileas))\nnot Operculate(sileas) -> Laze(sileas, sibbie)\nforall x (Macerate(x, sibbie) -> Laze(x, sibbie))\n\nInsolate(sileas, sileas)\n\nInsolate(sileas, sileas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The tildy crepitate the myles. The tildy is inguinal. The tildy is edible. The tildy weight the myles. The myles crepitate the tildy. The myles is awakened. The myles is inguinal. The myles is not gaping. The myles is pandurate. The myles is edible. The myles weight the tildy. The myles arborize the tildy. Red things are pandurate. If the myles arborize the tildy then the myles weight the tildy. If something crepitate the myles and it is pandurate then it arborize the myles. If something is awakened and it weight the tildy then it arborize the myles. If the myles is not edible then the myles arborize the tildy. If something weight the tildy then it arborize the tildy. The myles does not like the myles.", "logic": "\nCrepitate(tildy, myles)\nInguinal(tildy)\nEdible(tildy)\nWeight(tildy, myles)\nCrepitate(myles, tildy)\nAwakened(myles)\nInguinal(myles)\nnot Gaping(myles)\nPandurate(myles)\nEdible(myles)\nWeight(myles, tildy)\nArborize(myles, tildy)\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Pandurate(x))\nArborize(myles, tildy) -> Weight(myles, tildy)\nforall x (Crepitate(x, myles) and Pandurate(x) -> Arborize(x, myles))\nforall x (Awakened(x) and Weight(x, tildy) -> Arborize(x, myles))\nnot Edible(myles) -> Arborize(myles, tildy)\nforall x (Weight(x, tildy) -> Arborize(x, tildy))\n\nnot Weight(myles, myles)\n\nnot Weight(myles, myles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The bernardo slope the audrey. The bernardo is allargando. The bernardo is mural. The bernardo salivate the audrey. The audrey slope the bernardo. The audrey is unmusical. The audrey is allargando. The audrey is not clannish. The audrey is crushed. The audrey is mural. The audrey salivate the bernardo. The audrey bugle the bernardo. Red things are crushed. If the audrey bugle the bernardo then the audrey salivate the bernardo. If something slope the audrey and it is crushed then it bugle the audrey. If something is unmusical and it salivate the bernardo then it bugle the audrey. If the audrey is not mural then the audrey bugle the bernardo. If something salivate the bernardo then it bugle the bernardo. The bernardo is unmusical.", "logic": "\nSlope(bernardo, audrey)\nAllargando(bernardo)\nMural(bernardo)\nSalivate(bernardo, audrey)\nSlope(audrey, bernardo)\nUnmusical(audrey)\nAllargando(audrey)\nnot Clannish(audrey)\nCrushed(audrey)\nMural(audrey)\nSalivate(audrey, bernardo)\nBugle(audrey, bernardo)\nforall x (Mural(x) -> Crushed(x))\nBugle(audrey, bernardo) -> Salivate(audrey, bernardo)\nforall x (Slope(x, audrey) and Crushed(x) -> Bugle(x, audrey))\nforall x (Unmusical(x) and Salivate(x, bernardo) -> Bugle(x, audrey))\nnot Mural(audrey) -> Bugle(audrey, bernardo)\nforall x (Salivate(x, bernardo) -> Bugle(x, bernardo))\n\nUnmusical(bernardo)\n\nUnmusical(bernardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-221"} {"premises": "The tod does not chase the wilma. The tod is reinforced. The tod is squirting. The tod is sheetlike. The tod is gyral. The tod jinx the wilma. The tod marinade the wilma. The wilma renounce the tod. The wilma is not reinforced. The wilma is squirting. The wilma is not gyral. The wilma jinx the tod. If someone is troublous and they see the wilma then the wilma marinade the tod. If someone renounce the wilma then the wilma marinade the tod. If the tod jinx the wilma then the wilma marinade the tod. If someone jinx the wilma then they do not visit the tod. If someone is troublous and they see the tod then the tod does not see the wilma. If someone jinx the tod and they are gyral then the tod does not see the wilma. If someone marinade the tod and they are not gyral then they chase the wilma. If someone marinade the wilma and they are not gyral then they are not sheetlike. The wilma jinx the tod.", "logic": "\nnot Renounce(tod, wilma)\nReinforced(tod)\nSquirting(tod)\nSheetlike(tod)\nGyral(tod)\nJinx(tod, wilma)\nMarinade(tod, wilma)\nRenounce(wilma, tod)\nnot Reinforced(wilma)\nSquirting(wilma)\nnot Gyral(wilma)\nJinx(wilma, tod)\nforall x (Troublous(x) and Jinx(x, wilma) -> Marinade(wilma, tod))\nforall x (Renounce(x, wilma) -> Marinade(wilma, tod))\nJinx(tod, wilma) -> Marinade(wilma, tod)\nforall x (Jinx(x, wilma) -> not Marinade(x, tod))\nforall x (Troublous(x) and Jinx(x, tod) -> not Jinx(tod, wilma))\nforall x (Jinx(x, tod) and Gyral(x) -> not Jinx(tod, wilma))\nforall x (Marinade(x, tod) and not Gyral(x) -> Renounce(x, wilma))\nforall x (Marinade(x, wilma) and not Gyral(x) -> not Sheetlike(x))\n\nJinx(wilma, tod)\n\ntherefore Jinx(wilma, tod)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The dody does not chase the rex. The dody is unadorned. The dody is unsmiling. The dody is torn. The dody is serologic. The dody disinfect the rex. The dody fill the rex. The rex interpose the dody. The rex is not unadorned. The rex is unsmiling. The rex is not serologic. The rex disinfect the dody. If someone is affable and they see the rex then the rex fill the dody. If someone interpose the rex then the rex fill the dody. If the dody disinfect the rex then the rex fill the dody. If someone disinfect the rex then they do not visit the dody. If someone is affable and they see the dody then the dody does not see the rex. If someone disinfect the dody and they are serologic then the dody does not see the rex. If someone fill the dody and they are not serologic then they chase the rex. If someone fill the rex and they are not serologic then they are not torn. The dody does not see the rex.", "logic": "\nnot Interpose(dody, rex)\nUnadorned(dody)\nUnsmiling(dody)\nTorn(dody)\nSerologic(dody)\nDisinfect(dody, rex)\nFill(dody, rex)\nInterpose(rex, dody)\nnot Unadorned(rex)\nUnsmiling(rex)\nnot Serologic(rex)\nDisinfect(rex, dody)\nforall x (Affable(x) and Disinfect(x, rex) -> Fill(rex, dody))\nforall x (Interpose(x, rex) -> Fill(rex, dody))\nDisinfect(dody, rex) -> Fill(rex, dody)\nforall x (Disinfect(x, rex) -> not Fill(x, dody))\nforall x (Affable(x) and Disinfect(x, dody) -> not Disinfect(dody, rex))\nforall x (Disinfect(x, dody) and Serologic(x) -> not Disinfect(dody, rex))\nforall x (Fill(x, dody) and not Serologic(x) -> Interpose(x, rex))\nforall x (Fill(x, rex) and not Serologic(x) -> not Torn(x))\n\nnot Disinfect(dody, rex)\n\ntherefore Disinfect(dody, rex)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The keenan does not chase the madelene. The keenan is homiletic. The keenan is sickening. The keenan is analeptic. The keenan is sepulchral. The keenan pucker the madelene. The keenan cram the madelene. The madelene equalise the keenan. The madelene is not homiletic. The madelene is sickening. The madelene is not sepulchral. The madelene pucker the keenan. If someone is oversewn and they see the madelene then the madelene cram the keenan. If someone equalise the madelene then the madelene cram the keenan. If the keenan pucker the madelene then the madelene cram the keenan. If someone pucker the madelene then they do not visit the keenan. If someone is oversewn and they see the keenan then the keenan does not see the madelene. If someone pucker the keenan and they are sepulchral then the keenan does not see the madelene. If someone cram the keenan and they are not sepulchral then they chase the madelene. If someone cram the madelene and they are not sepulchral then they are not analeptic. The madelene cram the keenan.", "logic": "\nnot Equalise(keenan, madelene)\nHomiletic(keenan)\nSickening(keenan)\nAnaleptic(keenan)\nSepulchral(keenan)\nPucker(keenan, madelene)\nCram(keenan, madelene)\nEqualise(madelene, keenan)\nnot Homiletic(madelene)\nSickening(madelene)\nnot Sepulchral(madelene)\nPucker(madelene, keenan)\nforall x (Oversewn(x) and Pucker(x, madelene) -> Cram(madelene, keenan))\nforall x (Equalise(x, madelene) -> Cram(madelene, keenan))\nPucker(keenan, madelene) -> Cram(madelene, keenan)\nforall x (Pucker(x, madelene) -> not Cram(x, keenan))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) and Pucker(x, keenan) -> not Pucker(keenan, madelene))\nforall x (Pucker(x, keenan) and Sepulchral(x) -> not Pucker(keenan, madelene))\nforall x (Cram(x, keenan) and not Sepulchral(x) -> Equalise(x, madelene))\nforall x (Cram(x, madelene) and not Sepulchral(x) -> not Analeptic(x))\n\nCram(madelene, keenan)\n\nPucker(keenan, madelene) and Pucker(keenan, madelene) -> Cram(madelene, keenan) -> therefore Cram(madelene, keenan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The stanfield does not chase the norene. The stanfield is publicised. The stanfield is funicular. The stanfield is catoptric. The stanfield is spectacled. The stanfield sulfurette the norene. The stanfield slip the norene. The norene scramble the stanfield. The norene is not publicised. The norene is funicular. The norene is not spectacled. The norene sulfurette the stanfield. If someone is pussy and they see the norene then the norene slip the stanfield. If someone scramble the norene then the norene slip the stanfield. If the stanfield sulfurette the norene then the norene slip the stanfield. If someone sulfurette the norene then they do not visit the stanfield. If someone is pussy and they see the stanfield then the stanfield does not see the norene. If someone sulfurette the stanfield and they are spectacled then the stanfield does not see the norene. If someone slip the stanfield and they are not spectacled then they chase the norene. If someone slip the norene and they are not spectacled then they are not catoptric. The norene does not visit the stanfield.", "logic": "\nnot Scramble(stanfield, norene)\nPublicised(stanfield)\nFunicular(stanfield)\nCatoptric(stanfield)\nSpectacled(stanfield)\nSulfurette(stanfield, norene)\nSlip(stanfield, norene)\nScramble(norene, stanfield)\nnot Publicised(norene)\nFunicular(norene)\nnot Spectacled(norene)\nSulfurette(norene, stanfield)\nforall x (Pussy(x) and Sulfurette(x, norene) -> Slip(norene, stanfield))\nforall x (Scramble(x, norene) -> Slip(norene, stanfield))\nSulfurette(stanfield, norene) -> Slip(norene, stanfield)\nforall x (Sulfurette(x, norene) -> not Slip(x, stanfield))\nforall x (Pussy(x) and Sulfurette(x, stanfield) -> not Sulfurette(stanfield, norene))\nforall x (Sulfurette(x, stanfield) and Spectacled(x) -> not Sulfurette(stanfield, norene))\nforall x (Slip(x, stanfield) and not Spectacled(x) -> Scramble(x, norene))\nforall x (Slip(x, norene) and not Spectacled(x) -> not Catoptric(x))\n\nnot Slip(norene, stanfield)\n\nSulfurette(stanfield, norene) and Sulfurette(stanfield, norene) -> Slip(norene, stanfield) -> therefore Slip(norene, stanfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The micki does not chase the allah. The micki is antiknock. The micki is breakaway. The micki is foetal. The micki is global. The micki green the allah. The micki fetishize the allah. The allah sharpen the micki. The allah is not antiknock. The allah is breakaway. The allah is not global. The allah green the micki. If someone is underclass and they see the allah then the allah fetishize the micki. If someone sharpen the allah then the allah fetishize the micki. If the micki green the allah then the allah fetishize the micki. If someone green the allah then they do not visit the micki. If someone is underclass and they see the micki then the micki does not see the allah. If someone green the micki and they are global then the micki does not see the allah. If someone fetishize the micki and they are not global then they chase the allah. If someone fetishize the allah and they are not global then they are not foetal. The allah sharpen the allah.", "logic": "\nnot Sharpen(micki, allah)\nAntiknock(micki)\nBreakaway(micki)\nFoetal(micki)\nGlobal(micki)\nGreen(micki, allah)\nFetishize(micki, allah)\nSharpen(allah, micki)\nnot Antiknock(allah)\nBreakaway(allah)\nnot Global(allah)\nGreen(allah, micki)\nforall x (Underclass(x) and Green(x, allah) -> Fetishize(allah, micki))\nforall x (Sharpen(x, allah) -> Fetishize(allah, micki))\nGreen(micki, allah) -> Fetishize(allah, micki)\nforall x (Green(x, allah) -> not Fetishize(x, micki))\nforall x (Underclass(x) and Green(x, micki) -> not Green(micki, allah))\nforall x (Green(x, micki) and Global(x) -> not Green(micki, allah))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, micki) and not Global(x) -> Sharpen(x, allah))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, allah) and not Global(x) -> not Foetal(x))\n\nSharpen(allah, allah)\n\nGreen(micki, allah) and Green(micki, allah) -> Fetishize(allah, micki) -> therefore Fetishize(allah, micki) Fetishize(allah, micki) and not Global(allah) and forall x (Fetishize(x, micki) and not Global(x) -> Sharpen(x, allah)) -> therefore Sharpen(allah, allah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The celisse does not chase the gino. The celisse is unraised. The celisse is commutable. The celisse is boracic. The celisse is southbound. The celisse attenuate the gino. The celisse tarnish the gino. The gino bull the celisse. The gino is not unraised. The gino is commutable. The gino is not southbound. The gino attenuate the celisse. If someone is parched and they see the gino then the gino tarnish the celisse. If someone bull the gino then the gino tarnish the celisse. If the celisse attenuate the gino then the gino tarnish the celisse. If someone attenuate the gino then they do not visit the celisse. If someone is parched and they see the celisse then the celisse does not see the gino. If someone attenuate the celisse and they are southbound then the celisse does not see the gino. If someone tarnish the celisse and they are not southbound then they chase the gino. If someone tarnish the gino and they are not southbound then they are not boracic. The gino does not chase the gino.", "logic": "\nnot Bull(celisse, gino)\nUnraised(celisse)\nCommutable(celisse)\nBoracic(celisse)\nSouthbound(celisse)\nAttenuate(celisse, gino)\nTarnish(celisse, gino)\nBull(gino, celisse)\nnot Unraised(gino)\nCommutable(gino)\nnot Southbound(gino)\nAttenuate(gino, celisse)\nforall x (Parched(x) and Attenuate(x, gino) -> Tarnish(gino, celisse))\nforall x (Bull(x, gino) -> Tarnish(gino, celisse))\nAttenuate(celisse, gino) -> Tarnish(gino, celisse)\nforall x (Attenuate(x, gino) -> not Tarnish(x, celisse))\nforall x (Parched(x) and Attenuate(x, celisse) -> not Attenuate(celisse, gino))\nforall x (Attenuate(x, celisse) and Southbound(x) -> not Attenuate(celisse, gino))\nforall x (Tarnish(x, celisse) and not Southbound(x) -> Bull(x, gino))\nforall x (Tarnish(x, gino) and not Southbound(x) -> not Boracic(x))\n\nnot Bull(gino, gino)\n\nAttenuate(celisse, gino) and Attenuate(celisse, gino) -> Tarnish(gino, celisse) -> therefore Tarnish(gino, celisse) Tarnish(gino, celisse) and not Southbound(gino) and forall x (Tarnish(x, celisse) and not Southbound(x) -> Bull(x, gino)) -> therefore Bull(gino, gino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The annmarie does not chase the kacy. The annmarie is appealable. The annmarie is coseismal. The annmarie is currish. The annmarie is buggy. The annmarie splay the kacy. The annmarie snip the kacy. The kacy swivel the annmarie. The kacy is not appealable. The kacy is coseismal. The kacy is not buggy. The kacy splay the annmarie. If someone is left and they see the kacy then the kacy snip the annmarie. If someone swivel the kacy then the kacy snip the annmarie. If the annmarie splay the kacy then the kacy snip the annmarie. If someone splay the kacy then they do not visit the annmarie. If someone is left and they see the annmarie then the annmarie does not see the kacy. If someone splay the annmarie and they are buggy then the annmarie does not see the kacy. If someone snip the annmarie and they are not buggy then they chase the kacy. If someone snip the kacy and they are not buggy then they are not currish. The annmarie does not see the annmarie.", "logic": "\nnot Swivel(annmarie, kacy)\nAppealable(annmarie)\nCoseismal(annmarie)\nCurrish(annmarie)\nBuggy(annmarie)\nSplay(annmarie, kacy)\nSnip(annmarie, kacy)\nSwivel(kacy, annmarie)\nnot Appealable(kacy)\nCoseismal(kacy)\nnot Buggy(kacy)\nSplay(kacy, annmarie)\nforall x (Left(x) and Splay(x, kacy) -> Snip(kacy, annmarie))\nforall x (Swivel(x, kacy) -> Snip(kacy, annmarie))\nSplay(annmarie, kacy) -> Snip(kacy, annmarie)\nforall x (Splay(x, kacy) -> not Snip(x, annmarie))\nforall x (Left(x) and Splay(x, annmarie) -> not Splay(annmarie, kacy))\nforall x (Splay(x, annmarie) and Buggy(x) -> not Splay(annmarie, kacy))\nforall x (Snip(x, annmarie) and not Buggy(x) -> Swivel(x, kacy))\nforall x (Snip(x, kacy) and not Buggy(x) -> not Currish(x))\n\nnot Splay(annmarie, annmarie)\n\nnot Splay(annmarie, annmarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The amadeus does not chase the merralee. The amadeus is snobby. The amadeus is unlovable. The amadeus is erstwhile. The amadeus is vasiform. The amadeus beseech the merralee. The amadeus prejudice the merralee. The merralee reopen the amadeus. The merralee is not snobby. The merralee is unlovable. The merralee is not vasiform. The merralee beseech the amadeus. If someone is scaly and they see the merralee then the merralee prejudice the amadeus. If someone reopen the merralee then the merralee prejudice the amadeus. If the amadeus beseech the merralee then the merralee prejudice the amadeus. If someone beseech the merralee then they do not visit the amadeus. If someone is scaly and they see the amadeus then the amadeus does not see the merralee. If someone beseech the amadeus and they are vasiform then the amadeus does not see the merralee. If someone prejudice the amadeus and they are not vasiform then they chase the merralee. If someone prejudice the merralee and they are not vasiform then they are not erstwhile. The merralee prejudice the merralee.", "logic": "\nnot Reopen(amadeus, merralee)\nSnobby(amadeus)\nUnlovable(amadeus)\nErstwhile(amadeus)\nVasiform(amadeus)\nBeseech(amadeus, merralee)\nPrejudice(amadeus, merralee)\nReopen(merralee, amadeus)\nnot Snobby(merralee)\nUnlovable(merralee)\nnot Vasiform(merralee)\nBeseech(merralee, amadeus)\nforall x (Scaly(x) and Beseech(x, merralee) -> Prejudice(merralee, amadeus))\nforall x (Reopen(x, merralee) -> Prejudice(merralee, amadeus))\nBeseech(amadeus, merralee) -> Prejudice(merralee, amadeus)\nforall x (Beseech(x, merralee) -> not Prejudice(x, amadeus))\nforall x (Scaly(x) and Beseech(x, amadeus) -> not Beseech(amadeus, merralee))\nforall x (Beseech(x, amadeus) and Vasiform(x) -> not Beseech(amadeus, merralee))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, amadeus) and not Vasiform(x) -> Reopen(x, merralee))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, merralee) and not Vasiform(x) -> not Erstwhile(x))\n\nPrejudice(merralee, merralee)\n\nPrejudice(merralee, merralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The lorrayne does not chase the stevena. The lorrayne is spanking. The lorrayne is protozoal. The lorrayne is unopen. The lorrayne is undying. The lorrayne satirise the stevena. The lorrayne terrorize the stevena. The stevena shellack the lorrayne. The stevena is not spanking. The stevena is protozoal. The stevena is not undying. The stevena satirise the lorrayne. If someone is splanchnic and they see the stevena then the stevena terrorize the lorrayne. If someone shellack the stevena then the stevena terrorize the lorrayne. If the lorrayne satirise the stevena then the stevena terrorize the lorrayne. If someone satirise the stevena then they do not visit the lorrayne. If someone is splanchnic and they see the lorrayne then the lorrayne does not see the stevena. If someone satirise the lorrayne and they are undying then the lorrayne does not see the stevena. If someone terrorize the lorrayne and they are not undying then they chase the stevena. If someone terrorize the stevena and they are not undying then they are not unopen. The stevena is not splanchnic.", "logic": "\nnot Shellack(lorrayne, stevena)\nSpanking(lorrayne)\nProtozoal(lorrayne)\nUnopen(lorrayne)\nUndying(lorrayne)\nSatirise(lorrayne, stevena)\nTerrorize(lorrayne, stevena)\nShellack(stevena, lorrayne)\nnot Spanking(stevena)\nProtozoal(stevena)\nnot Undying(stevena)\nSatirise(stevena, lorrayne)\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and Satirise(x, stevena) -> Terrorize(stevena, lorrayne))\nforall x (Shellack(x, stevena) -> Terrorize(stevena, lorrayne))\nSatirise(lorrayne, stevena) -> Terrorize(stevena, lorrayne)\nforall x (Satirise(x, stevena) -> not Terrorize(x, lorrayne))\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and Satirise(x, lorrayne) -> not Satirise(lorrayne, stevena))\nforall x (Satirise(x, lorrayne) and Undying(x) -> not Satirise(lorrayne, stevena))\nforall x (Terrorize(x, lorrayne) and not Undying(x) -> Shellack(x, stevena))\nforall x (Terrorize(x, stevena) and not Undying(x) -> not Unopen(x))\n\nnot Splanchnic(stevena)\n\nnot Splanchnic(stevena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The jaclyn does not chase the terese. The jaclyn is turkmen. The jaclyn is barren. The jaclyn is irreverent. The jaclyn is nefarious. The jaclyn beplaster the terese. The jaclyn coarsen the terese. The terese abet the jaclyn. The terese is not turkmen. The terese is barren. The terese is not nefarious. The terese beplaster the jaclyn. If someone is asterismal and they see the terese then the terese coarsen the jaclyn. If someone abet the terese then the terese coarsen the jaclyn. If the jaclyn beplaster the terese then the terese coarsen the jaclyn. If someone beplaster the terese then they do not visit the jaclyn. If someone is asterismal and they see the jaclyn then the jaclyn does not see the terese. If someone beplaster the jaclyn and they are nefarious then the jaclyn does not see the terese. If someone coarsen the jaclyn and they are not nefarious then they chase the terese. If someone coarsen the terese and they are not nefarious then they are not irreverent. The jaclyn abet the jaclyn.", "logic": "\nnot Abet(jaclyn, terese)\nTurkmen(jaclyn)\nBarren(jaclyn)\nIrreverent(jaclyn)\nNefarious(jaclyn)\nBeplaster(jaclyn, terese)\nCoarsen(jaclyn, terese)\nAbet(terese, jaclyn)\nnot Turkmen(terese)\nBarren(terese)\nnot Nefarious(terese)\nBeplaster(terese, jaclyn)\nforall x (Asterismal(x) and Beplaster(x, terese) -> Coarsen(terese, jaclyn))\nforall x (Abet(x, terese) -> Coarsen(terese, jaclyn))\nBeplaster(jaclyn, terese) -> Coarsen(terese, jaclyn)\nforall x (Beplaster(x, terese) -> not Coarsen(x, jaclyn))\nforall x (Asterismal(x) and Beplaster(x, jaclyn) -> not Beplaster(jaclyn, terese))\nforall x (Beplaster(x, jaclyn) and Nefarious(x) -> not Beplaster(jaclyn, terese))\nforall x (Coarsen(x, jaclyn) and not Nefarious(x) -> Abet(x, terese))\nforall x (Coarsen(x, terese) and not Nefarious(x) -> not Irreverent(x))\n\nAbet(jaclyn, jaclyn)\n\nAbet(jaclyn, jaclyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The maryjane does not chase the adah. The maryjane is ichorous. The maryjane is resurgent. The maryjane is motivative. The maryjane is icebound. The maryjane spearhead the adah. The maryjane retch the adah. The adah solder the maryjane. The adah is not ichorous. The adah is resurgent. The adah is not icebound. The adah spearhead the maryjane. If someone is adjusted and they see the adah then the adah retch the maryjane. If someone solder the adah then the adah retch the maryjane. If the maryjane spearhead the adah then the adah retch the maryjane. If someone spearhead the adah then they do not visit the maryjane. If someone is adjusted and they see the maryjane then the maryjane does not see the adah. If someone spearhead the maryjane and they are icebound then the maryjane does not see the adah. If someone retch the maryjane and they are not icebound then they chase the adah. If someone retch the adah and they are not icebound then they are not motivative. The adah is not motivative.", "logic": "\nnot Solder(maryjane, adah)\nIchorous(maryjane)\nResurgent(maryjane)\nMotivative(maryjane)\nIcebound(maryjane)\nSpearhead(maryjane, adah)\nRetch(maryjane, adah)\nSolder(adah, maryjane)\nnot Ichorous(adah)\nResurgent(adah)\nnot Icebound(adah)\nSpearhead(adah, maryjane)\nforall x (Adjusted(x) and Spearhead(x, adah) -> Retch(adah, maryjane))\nforall x (Solder(x, adah) -> Retch(adah, maryjane))\nSpearhead(maryjane, adah) -> Retch(adah, maryjane)\nforall x (Spearhead(x, adah) -> not Retch(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Adjusted(x) and Spearhead(x, maryjane) -> not Spearhead(maryjane, adah))\nforall x (Spearhead(x, maryjane) and Icebound(x) -> not Spearhead(maryjane, adah))\nforall x (Retch(x, maryjane) and not Icebound(x) -> Solder(x, adah))\nforall x (Retch(x, adah) and not Icebound(x) -> not Motivative(x))\n\nnot Motivative(adah)\n\nnot Motivative(adah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "The annelise does not chase the rosalyn. The annelise is inexact. The annelise is regulatory. The annelise is anaclitic. The annelise is publicised. The annelise waken the rosalyn. The annelise watercolor the rosalyn. The rosalyn disable the annelise. The rosalyn is not inexact. The rosalyn is regulatory. The rosalyn is not publicised. The rosalyn waken the annelise. If someone is swagger and they see the rosalyn then the rosalyn watercolor the annelise. If someone disable the rosalyn then the rosalyn watercolor the annelise. If the annelise waken the rosalyn then the rosalyn watercolor the annelise. If someone waken the rosalyn then they do not visit the annelise. If someone is swagger and they see the annelise then the annelise does not see the rosalyn. If someone waken the annelise and they are publicised then the annelise does not see the rosalyn. If someone watercolor the annelise and they are not publicised then they chase the rosalyn. If someone watercolor the rosalyn and they are not publicised then they are not anaclitic. The rosalyn waken the rosalyn.", "logic": "\nnot Disable(annelise, rosalyn)\nInexact(annelise)\nRegulatory(annelise)\nAnaclitic(annelise)\nPublicised(annelise)\nWaken(annelise, rosalyn)\nWatercolor(annelise, rosalyn)\nDisable(rosalyn, annelise)\nnot Inexact(rosalyn)\nRegulatory(rosalyn)\nnot Publicised(rosalyn)\nWaken(rosalyn, annelise)\nforall x (Swagger(x) and Waken(x, rosalyn) -> Watercolor(rosalyn, annelise))\nforall x (Disable(x, rosalyn) -> Watercolor(rosalyn, annelise))\nWaken(annelise, rosalyn) -> Watercolor(rosalyn, annelise)\nforall x (Waken(x, rosalyn) -> not Watercolor(x, annelise))\nforall x (Swagger(x) and Waken(x, annelise) -> not Waken(annelise, rosalyn))\nforall x (Waken(x, annelise) and Publicised(x) -> not Waken(annelise, rosalyn))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, annelise) and not Publicised(x) -> Disable(x, rosalyn))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, rosalyn) and not Publicised(x) -> not Anaclitic(x))\n\nWaken(rosalyn, rosalyn)\n\nWaken(rosalyn, rosalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-899"} {"premises": "Marcello is starring. Marcello is misogynous. Marcello is nonplussed. Marcello is tailed. Marcello is voracious. Melesa is starring. Melesa is misogynous. Melesa is nonplussed. Melesa is nonfat. Melesa is tailed. Melesa is prismatic. Melesa is voracious. All nonplussed things are nonfat. If Melesa is tailed and Melesa is starring then Melesa is misogynous. If something is nonfat and nonplussed then it is prismatic. Marcello is misogynous.", "logic": "\nStarring(marcello)\nMisogynous(marcello)\nNonplussed(marcello)\nTailed(marcello)\nVoracious(marcello)\nStarring(melesa)\nMisogynous(melesa)\nNonplussed(melesa)\nNonfat(melesa)\nTailed(melesa)\nPrismatic(melesa)\nVoracious(melesa)\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Nonfat(x))\nTailed(melesa) and Starring(melesa) -> Misogynous(melesa)\nforall x (Nonfat(x) and Nonplussed(x) -> Prismatic(x))\n\nMisogynous(marcello)\n\ntherefore Misogynous(marcello)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-304"} {"premises": "Kary is riskless. Kary is bounded. Kary is actionable. Kary is vented. Kary is welfarist. Cassondra is riskless. Cassondra is bounded. Cassondra is actionable. Cassondra is costumed. Cassondra is vented. Cassondra is unclothed. Cassondra is welfarist. All actionable things are costumed. If Cassondra is vented and Cassondra is riskless then Cassondra is bounded. If something is costumed and actionable then it is unclothed. Kary is not actionable.", "logic": "\nRiskless(kary)\nBounded(kary)\nActionable(kary)\nVented(kary)\nWelfarist(kary)\nRiskless(cassondra)\nBounded(cassondra)\nActionable(cassondra)\nCostumed(cassondra)\nVented(cassondra)\nUnclothed(cassondra)\nWelfarist(cassondra)\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Costumed(x))\nVented(cassondra) and Riskless(cassondra) -> Bounded(cassondra)\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Actionable(x) -> Unclothed(x))\n\nnot Actionable(kary)\n\ntherefore Actionable(kary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-304"} {"premises": "Nathanil is pretorian. Nathanil is mistreated. Nathanil is catarrhal. Nathanil is willful. Nathanil is sonsy. Mohammad is pretorian. Mohammad is mistreated. Mohammad is catarrhal. Mohammad is nourished. Mohammad is willful. Mohammad is converted. Mohammad is sonsy. All catarrhal things are nourished. If Mohammad is willful and Mohammad is pretorian then Mohammad is mistreated. If something is nourished and catarrhal then it is converted. Nathanil is nourished.", "logic": "\nPretorian(nathanil)\nMistreated(nathanil)\nCatarrhal(nathanil)\nWillful(nathanil)\nSonsy(nathanil)\nPretorian(mohammad)\nMistreated(mohammad)\nCatarrhal(mohammad)\nNourished(mohammad)\nWillful(mohammad)\nConverted(mohammad)\nSonsy(mohammad)\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) -> Nourished(x))\nWillful(mohammad) and Pretorian(mohammad) -> Mistreated(mohammad)\nforall x (Nourished(x) and Catarrhal(x) -> Converted(x))\n\nNourished(nathanil)\n\nCatarrhal(nathanil) and forall x (Catarrhal(x) -> Nourished(x)) -> therefore Nourished(nathanil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-304"} {"premises": "Webb is continual. Webb is boiled. Webb is gardant. Webb is fatalist. Webb is violent. Reynolds is continual. Reynolds is boiled. Reynolds is gardant. Reynolds is mistakable. Reynolds is fatalist. Reynolds is symbolical. Reynolds is violent. All gardant things are mistakable. If Reynolds is fatalist and Reynolds is continual then Reynolds is boiled. If something is mistakable and gardant then it is symbolical. Webb is not mistakable.", "logic": "\nContinual(webb)\nBoiled(webb)\nGardant(webb)\nFatalist(webb)\nViolent(webb)\nContinual(reynolds)\nBoiled(reynolds)\nGardant(reynolds)\nMistakable(reynolds)\nFatalist(reynolds)\nSymbolical(reynolds)\nViolent(reynolds)\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nFatalist(reynolds) and Continual(reynolds) -> Boiled(reynolds)\nforall x (Mistakable(x) and Gardant(x) -> Symbolical(x))\n\nnot Mistakable(webb)\n\nGardant(webb) and forall x (Gardant(x) -> Mistakable(x)) -> therefore Mistakable(webb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-304"} {"premises": "Edin is nonbearing. Edin is vapid. Edin is biblical. Edin is sunset. Edin is hardy. Thadeus is nonbearing. Thadeus is vapid. Thadeus is biblical. Thadeus is humbling. Thadeus is sunset. Thadeus is micaceous. Thadeus is hardy. All biblical things are humbling. If Thadeus is sunset and Thadeus is nonbearing then Thadeus is vapid. If something is humbling and biblical then it is micaceous. Edin is micaceous.", "logic": "\nNonbearing(edin)\nVapid(edin)\nBiblical(edin)\nSunset(edin)\nHardy(edin)\nNonbearing(thadeus)\nVapid(thadeus)\nBiblical(thadeus)\nHumbling(thadeus)\nSunset(thadeus)\nMicaceous(thadeus)\nHardy(thadeus)\nforall x (Biblical(x) -> Humbling(x))\nSunset(thadeus) and Nonbearing(thadeus) -> Vapid(thadeus)\nforall x (Humbling(x) and Biblical(x) -> Micaceous(x))\n\nMicaceous(edin)\n\nBiblical(edin) and forall x (Biblical(x) -> Humbling(x)) -> therefore Humbling(edin) Humbling(edin) and Biblical(edin) and forall x (Humbling(x) and Biblical(x) -> Micaceous(x)) -> therefore Micaceous(edin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-304"} {"premises": "Fonz is victorious. Fonz is emphasized. Fonz is cross. Fonz is koranic. Fonz is depictive. Adel is victorious. Adel is emphasized. Adel is cross. Adel is unfed. Adel is koranic. Adel is living. Adel is depictive. All cross things are unfed. If Adel is koranic and Adel is victorious then Adel is emphasized. If something is unfed and cross then it is living. Fonz is not living.", "logic": "\nVictorious(fonz)\nEmphasized(fonz)\nCross(fonz)\nKoranic(fonz)\nDepictive(fonz)\nVictorious(adel)\nEmphasized(adel)\nCross(adel)\nUnfed(adel)\nKoranic(adel)\nLiving(adel)\nDepictive(adel)\nforall x (Cross(x) -> Unfed(x))\nKoranic(adel) and Victorious(adel) -> Emphasized(adel)\nforall x (Unfed(x) and Cross(x) -> Living(x))\n\nnot Living(fonz)\n\nCross(fonz) and forall x (Cross(x) -> Unfed(x)) -> therefore Unfed(fonz) Unfed(fonz) and Cross(fonz) and forall x (Unfed(x) and Cross(x) -> Living(x)) -> therefore Living(fonz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-304"} {"premises": "The rafael retread the kariotta. The rafael is astringent. The rafael is haemolytic. The rafael ruff the kariotta. The rafael borrow the kariotta. The kariotta retread the rafael. The kariotta is esurient. The kariotta is mercenary. The kariotta ruff the rafael. The kariotta borrow the rafael. If someone is mercenary then they see the rafael. If someone borrow the kariotta then they see the rafael. If someone borrow the rafael then they are not haemolytic. If someone is astringent then they are accusative. If someone ruff the kariotta then the kariotta is astringent. If someone ruff the rafael and they are not accusative then the rafael retread the kariotta. The rafael is haemolytic.", "logic": "\nRetread(rafael, kariotta)\nAstringent(rafael)\nHaemolytic(rafael)\nRuff(rafael, kariotta)\nBorrow(rafael, kariotta)\nRetread(kariotta, rafael)\nEsurient(kariotta)\nMercenary(kariotta)\nRuff(kariotta, rafael)\nBorrow(kariotta, rafael)\nforall x (Mercenary(x) -> Ruff(x, rafael))\nforall x (Borrow(x, kariotta) -> Ruff(x, rafael))\nforall x (Borrow(x, rafael) -> not Haemolytic(x))\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> Accusative(x))\nforall x (Ruff(x, kariotta) -> Astringent(kariotta))\nforall x (Ruff(x, rafael) and not Accusative(x) -> Retread(rafael, kariotta))\n\nHaemolytic(rafael)\n\ntherefore Haemolytic(rafael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The sapphire detick the dasie. The sapphire is tined. The sapphire is decorous. The sapphire polemicise the dasie. The sapphire crimp the dasie. The dasie detick the sapphire. The dasie is unobvious. The dasie is celiac. The dasie polemicise the sapphire. The dasie crimp the sapphire. If someone is celiac then they see the sapphire. If someone crimp the dasie then they see the sapphire. If someone crimp the sapphire then they are not decorous. If someone is tined then they are septal. If someone polemicise the dasie then the dasie is tined. If someone polemicise the sapphire and they are not septal then the sapphire detick the dasie. The dasie does not visit the sapphire.", "logic": "\nDetick(sapphire, dasie)\nTined(sapphire)\nDecorous(sapphire)\nPolemicise(sapphire, dasie)\nCrimp(sapphire, dasie)\nDetick(dasie, sapphire)\nUnobvious(dasie)\nCeliac(dasie)\nPolemicise(dasie, sapphire)\nCrimp(dasie, sapphire)\nforall x (Celiac(x) -> Polemicise(x, sapphire))\nforall x (Crimp(x, dasie) -> Polemicise(x, sapphire))\nforall x (Crimp(x, sapphire) -> not Decorous(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, dasie) -> Tined(dasie))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, sapphire) and not Septal(x) -> Detick(sapphire, dasie))\n\nnot Crimp(dasie, sapphire)\n\ntherefore Crimp(dasie, sapphire)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The arleta reassure the cornellis. The arleta is unlatched. The arleta is anuretic. The arleta unyoke the cornellis. The arleta accost the cornellis. The cornellis reassure the arleta. The cornellis is lacrimal. The cornellis is amino. The cornellis unyoke the arleta. The cornellis accost the arleta. If someone is amino then they see the arleta. If someone accost the cornellis then they see the arleta. If someone accost the arleta then they are not anuretic. If someone is unlatched then they are unchanging. If someone unyoke the cornellis then the cornellis is unlatched. If someone unyoke the arleta and they are not unchanging then the arleta reassure the cornellis. The arleta is unchanging.", "logic": "\nReassure(arleta, cornellis)\nUnlatched(arleta)\nAnuretic(arleta)\nUnyoke(arleta, cornellis)\nAccost(arleta, cornellis)\nReassure(cornellis, arleta)\nLacrimal(cornellis)\nAmino(cornellis)\nUnyoke(cornellis, arleta)\nAccost(cornellis, arleta)\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Unyoke(x, arleta))\nforall x (Accost(x, cornellis) -> Unyoke(x, arleta))\nforall x (Accost(x, arleta) -> not Anuretic(x))\nforall x (Unlatched(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, cornellis) -> Unlatched(cornellis))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, arleta) and not Unchanging(x) -> Reassure(arleta, cornellis))\n\nUnchanging(arleta)\n\nUnlatched(arleta) and forall x (Unlatched(x) -> Unchanging(x)) -> therefore Unchanging(arleta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The reggie mimeograph the samuel. The reggie is elliptic. The reggie is psychic. The reggie dispread the samuel. The reggie insinuate the samuel. The samuel mimeograph the reggie. The samuel is anhydrous. The samuel is unmourned. The samuel dispread the reggie. The samuel insinuate the reggie. If someone is unmourned then they see the reggie. If someone insinuate the samuel then they see the reggie. If someone insinuate the reggie then they are not psychic. If someone is elliptic then they are studied. If someone dispread the samuel then the samuel is elliptic. If someone dispread the reggie and they are not studied then the reggie mimeograph the samuel. The samuel is psychic.", "logic": "\nMimeograph(reggie, samuel)\nElliptic(reggie)\nPsychic(reggie)\nDispread(reggie, samuel)\nInsinuate(reggie, samuel)\nMimeograph(samuel, reggie)\nAnhydrous(samuel)\nUnmourned(samuel)\nDispread(samuel, reggie)\nInsinuate(samuel, reggie)\nforall x (Unmourned(x) -> Dispread(x, reggie))\nforall x (Insinuate(x, samuel) -> Dispread(x, reggie))\nforall x (Insinuate(x, reggie) -> not Psychic(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Studied(x))\nforall x (Dispread(x, samuel) -> Elliptic(samuel))\nforall x (Dispread(x, reggie) and not Studied(x) -> Mimeograph(reggie, samuel))\n\nPsychic(samuel)\n\nInsinuate(samuel, reggie) and forall x (Insinuate(x, reggie) -> not Psychic(x)) -> therefore not Psychic(samuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The ellyn bullshit the daniel. The ellyn is senegalese. The ellyn is punic. The ellyn blab the daniel. The ellyn fascinate the daniel. The daniel bullshit the ellyn. The daniel is chirpy. The daniel is hideous. The daniel blab the ellyn. The daniel fascinate the ellyn. If someone is hideous then they see the ellyn. If someone fascinate the daniel then they see the ellyn. If someone fascinate the ellyn then they are not punic. If someone is senegalese then they are credible. If someone blab the daniel then the daniel is senegalese. If someone blab the ellyn and they are not credible then the ellyn bullshit the daniel. The daniel is credible.", "logic": "\nBullshit(ellyn, daniel)\nSenegalese(ellyn)\nPunic(ellyn)\nBlab(ellyn, daniel)\nFascinate(ellyn, daniel)\nBullshit(daniel, ellyn)\nChirpy(daniel)\nHideous(daniel)\nBlab(daniel, ellyn)\nFascinate(daniel, ellyn)\nforall x (Hideous(x) -> Blab(x, ellyn))\nforall x (Fascinate(x, daniel) -> Blab(x, ellyn))\nforall x (Fascinate(x, ellyn) -> not Punic(x))\nforall x (Senegalese(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Blab(x, daniel) -> Senegalese(daniel))\nforall x (Blab(x, ellyn) and not Credible(x) -> Bullshit(ellyn, daniel))\n\nCredible(daniel)\n\nBlab(ellyn, daniel) and forall x (Blab(x, daniel) -> Senegalese(daniel)) -> therefore Senegalese(daniel) Senegalese(daniel) and forall x (Senegalese(x) -> Credible(x)) -> therefore Credible(daniel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The murielle bleach the nikolia. The murielle is crummy. The murielle is lxviii. The murielle narcotise the nikolia. The murielle stooge the nikolia. The nikolia bleach the murielle. The nikolia is negative. The nikolia is surpassing. The nikolia narcotise the murielle. The nikolia stooge the murielle. If someone is surpassing then they see the murielle. If someone stooge the nikolia then they see the murielle. If someone stooge the murielle then they are not lxviii. If someone is crummy then they are overall. If someone narcotise the nikolia then the nikolia is crummy. If someone narcotise the murielle and they are not overall then the murielle bleach the nikolia. The nikolia is not overall.", "logic": "\nBleach(murielle, nikolia)\nCrummy(murielle)\nLxviii(murielle)\nNarcotise(murielle, nikolia)\nStooge(murielle, nikolia)\nBleach(nikolia, murielle)\nNegative(nikolia)\nSurpassing(nikolia)\nNarcotise(nikolia, murielle)\nStooge(nikolia, murielle)\nforall x (Surpassing(x) -> Narcotise(x, murielle))\nforall x (Stooge(x, nikolia) -> Narcotise(x, murielle))\nforall x (Stooge(x, murielle) -> not Lxviii(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Overall(x))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, nikolia) -> Crummy(nikolia))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, murielle) and not Overall(x) -> Bleach(murielle, nikolia))\n\nnot Overall(nikolia)\n\nNarcotise(murielle, nikolia) and forall x (Narcotise(x, nikolia) -> Crummy(nikolia)) -> therefore Crummy(nikolia) Crummy(nikolia) and forall x (Crummy(x) -> Overall(x)) -> therefore Overall(nikolia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The arlette repossess the gordan. The arlette is observant. The arlette is wary. The arlette recycle the gordan. The arlette franchise the gordan. The gordan repossess the arlette. The gordan is sober. The gordan is antibiotic. The gordan recycle the arlette. The gordan franchise the arlette. If someone is antibiotic then they see the arlette. If someone franchise the gordan then they see the arlette. If someone franchise the arlette then they are not wary. If someone is observant then they are leadless. If someone recycle the gordan then the gordan is observant. If someone recycle the arlette and they are not leadless then the arlette repossess the gordan. The gordan does not see the gordan.", "logic": "\nRepossess(arlette, gordan)\nObservant(arlette)\nWary(arlette)\nRecycle(arlette, gordan)\nFranchise(arlette, gordan)\nRepossess(gordan, arlette)\nSober(gordan)\nAntibiotic(gordan)\nRecycle(gordan, arlette)\nFranchise(gordan, arlette)\nforall x (Antibiotic(x) -> Recycle(x, arlette))\nforall x (Franchise(x, gordan) -> Recycle(x, arlette))\nforall x (Franchise(x, arlette) -> not Wary(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) -> Leadless(x))\nforall x (Recycle(x, gordan) -> Observant(gordan))\nforall x (Recycle(x, arlette) and not Leadless(x) -> Repossess(arlette, gordan))\n\nnot Recycle(gordan, gordan)\n\nnot Recycle(gordan, gordan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The anny eyeball the eugine. The anny is lithuanian. The anny is monaural. The anny declaim the eugine. The anny clench the eugine. The eugine eyeball the anny. The eugine is untrusting. The eugine is cashed. The eugine declaim the anny. The eugine clench the anny. If someone is cashed then they see the anny. If someone clench the eugine then they see the anny. If someone clench the anny then they are not monaural. If someone is lithuanian then they are patellar. If someone declaim the eugine then the eugine is lithuanian. If someone declaim the anny and they are not patellar then the anny eyeball the eugine. The eugine eyeball the eugine.", "logic": "\nEyeball(anny, eugine)\nLithuanian(anny)\nMonaural(anny)\nDeclaim(anny, eugine)\nClench(anny, eugine)\nEyeball(eugine, anny)\nUntrusting(eugine)\nCashed(eugine)\nDeclaim(eugine, anny)\nClench(eugine, anny)\nforall x (Cashed(x) -> Declaim(x, anny))\nforall x (Clench(x, eugine) -> Declaim(x, anny))\nforall x (Clench(x, anny) -> not Monaural(x))\nforall x (Lithuanian(x) -> Patellar(x))\nforall x (Declaim(x, eugine) -> Lithuanian(eugine))\nforall x (Declaim(x, anny) and not Patellar(x) -> Eyeball(anny, eugine))\n\nEyeball(eugine, eugine)\n\nEyeball(eugine, eugine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The gladis quote the fredia. The gladis is unguarded. The gladis is catchy. The gladis smoke the fredia. The gladis alleviate the fredia. The fredia quote the gladis. The fredia is answering. The fredia is mortifying. The fredia smoke the gladis. The fredia alleviate the gladis. If someone is mortifying then they see the gladis. If someone alleviate the fredia then they see the gladis. If someone alleviate the gladis then they are not catchy. If someone is unguarded then they are romantic. If someone smoke the fredia then the fredia is unguarded. If someone smoke the gladis and they are not romantic then the gladis quote the fredia. The gladis does not eat the gladis.", "logic": "\nQuote(gladis, fredia)\nUnguarded(gladis)\nCatchy(gladis)\nSmoke(gladis, fredia)\nAlleviate(gladis, fredia)\nQuote(fredia, gladis)\nAnswering(fredia)\nMortifying(fredia)\nSmoke(fredia, gladis)\nAlleviate(fredia, gladis)\nforall x (Mortifying(x) -> Smoke(x, gladis))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, fredia) -> Smoke(x, gladis))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, gladis) -> not Catchy(x))\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Romantic(x))\nforall x (Smoke(x, fredia) -> Unguarded(fredia))\nforall x (Smoke(x, gladis) and not Romantic(x) -> Quote(gladis, fredia))\n\nnot Quote(gladis, gladis)\n\nnot Quote(gladis, gladis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The ripley limn the star. The ripley is bipolar. The ripley is chylaceous. The ripley brighten the star. The ripley reprobate the star. The star limn the ripley. The star is biannual. The star is genial. The star brighten the ripley. The star reprobate the ripley. If someone is genial then they see the ripley. If someone reprobate the star then they see the ripley. If someone reprobate the ripley then they are not chylaceous. If someone is bipolar then they are darkling. If someone brighten the star then the star is bipolar. If someone brighten the ripley and they are not darkling then the ripley limn the star. The ripley is genial.", "logic": "\nLimn(ripley, star)\nBipolar(ripley)\nChylaceous(ripley)\nBrighten(ripley, star)\nReprobate(ripley, star)\nLimn(star, ripley)\nBiannual(star)\nGenial(star)\nBrighten(star, ripley)\nReprobate(star, ripley)\nforall x (Genial(x) -> Brighten(x, ripley))\nforall x (Reprobate(x, star) -> Brighten(x, ripley))\nforall x (Reprobate(x, ripley) -> not Chylaceous(x))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) -> Darkling(x))\nforall x (Brighten(x, star) -> Bipolar(star))\nforall x (Brighten(x, ripley) and not Darkling(x) -> Limn(ripley, star))\n\nGenial(ripley)\n\nGenial(ripley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The erica autoclave the dallas. The erica is shopworn. The erica is buttoned. The erica reseat the dallas. The erica repress the dallas. The dallas autoclave the erica. The dallas is handless. The dallas is smashed. The dallas reseat the erica. The dallas repress the erica. If someone is smashed then they see the erica. If someone repress the dallas then they see the erica. If someone repress the erica then they are not buttoned. If someone is shopworn then they are cadastral. If someone reseat the dallas then the dallas is shopworn. If someone reseat the erica and they are not cadastral then the erica autoclave the dallas. The dallas does not visit the dallas.", "logic": "\nAutoclave(erica, dallas)\nShopworn(erica)\nButtoned(erica)\nReseat(erica, dallas)\nRepress(erica, dallas)\nAutoclave(dallas, erica)\nHandless(dallas)\nSmashed(dallas)\nReseat(dallas, erica)\nRepress(dallas, erica)\nforall x (Smashed(x) -> Reseat(x, erica))\nforall x (Repress(x, dallas) -> Reseat(x, erica))\nforall x (Repress(x, erica) -> not Buttoned(x))\nforall x (Shopworn(x) -> Cadastral(x))\nforall x (Reseat(x, dallas) -> Shopworn(dallas))\nforall x (Reseat(x, erica) and not Cadastral(x) -> Autoclave(erica, dallas))\n\nnot Repress(dallas, dallas)\n\nnot Repress(dallas, dallas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The josefa recant the arabela. The josefa is quebecois. The josefa is opposite. The josefa distribute the arabela. The josefa vowelize the arabela. The arabela recant the josefa. The arabela is limber. The arabela is vermilion. The arabela distribute the josefa. The arabela vowelize the josefa. If someone is vermilion then they see the josefa. If someone vowelize the arabela then they see the josefa. If someone vowelize the josefa then they are not opposite. If someone is quebecois then they are naughty. If someone distribute the arabela then the arabela is quebecois. If someone distribute the josefa and they are not naughty then the josefa recant the arabela. The josefa vowelize the josefa.", "logic": "\nRecant(josefa, arabela)\nQuebecois(josefa)\nOpposite(josefa)\nDistribute(josefa, arabela)\nVowelize(josefa, arabela)\nRecant(arabela, josefa)\nLimber(arabela)\nVermilion(arabela)\nDistribute(arabela, josefa)\nVowelize(arabela, josefa)\nforall x (Vermilion(x) -> Distribute(x, josefa))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, arabela) -> Distribute(x, josefa))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, josefa) -> not Opposite(x))\nforall x (Quebecois(x) -> Naughty(x))\nforall x (Distribute(x, arabela) -> Quebecois(arabela))\nforall x (Distribute(x, josefa) and not Naughty(x) -> Recant(josefa, arabela))\n\nVowelize(josefa, josefa)\n\nVowelize(josefa, josefa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-192"} {"premises": "The othelia general the rosalind. The othelia potter the rosalind. The rosalind does not eat the othelia. If someone general the rosalind and they need the rosalind then they need the othelia. If someone general the othelia then the othelia is overpriced. If someone potter the rosalind and they need the othelia then they do not like the rosalind. The rosalind does not eat the othelia.", "logic": "\nGeneral(othelia, rosalind)\nPotter(othelia, rosalind)\nnot General(rosalind, othelia)\nforall x (General(x, rosalind) and Potter(x, rosalind) -> Potter(x, othelia))\nforall x (General(x, othelia) -> Overpriced(othelia))\nforall x (Potter(x, rosalind) and Potter(x, othelia) -> not Claw(x, rosalind))\n\nnot General(rosalind, othelia)\n\ntherefore not General(rosalind, othelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The cleland exhibit the adaline. The cleland concentre the adaline. The adaline does not eat the cleland. If someone exhibit the adaline and they need the adaline then they need the cleland. If someone exhibit the cleland then the cleland is implicit. If someone concentre the adaline and they need the cleland then they do not like the adaline. The adaline exhibit the cleland.", "logic": "\nExhibit(cleland, adaline)\nConcentre(cleland, adaline)\nnot Exhibit(adaline, cleland)\nforall x (Exhibit(x, adaline) and Concentre(x, adaline) -> Concentre(x, cleland))\nforall x (Exhibit(x, cleland) -> Implicit(cleland))\nforall x (Concentre(x, adaline) and Concentre(x, cleland) -> not Frap(x, adaline))\n\nExhibit(adaline, cleland)\n\ntherefore not Exhibit(adaline, cleland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The sapphira misspend the katerine. The sapphira mass the katerine. The katerine does not eat the sapphira. If someone misspend the katerine and they need the katerine then they need the sapphira. If someone misspend the sapphira then the sapphira is common. If someone mass the katerine and they need the sapphira then they do not like the katerine. The sapphira mass the sapphira.", "logic": "\nMisspend(sapphira, katerine)\nMass(sapphira, katerine)\nnot Misspend(katerine, sapphira)\nforall x (Misspend(x, katerine) and Mass(x, katerine) -> Mass(x, sapphira))\nforall x (Misspend(x, sapphira) -> Common(sapphira))\nforall x (Mass(x, katerine) and Mass(x, sapphira) -> not Bespot(x, katerine))\n\nMass(sapphira, sapphira)\n\nMisspend(sapphira, katerine) and Mass(sapphira, katerine) and forall x (Misspend(x, katerine) and Mass(x, katerine) -> Mass(x, sapphira)) -> therefore Mass(sapphira, sapphira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The meta exfoliate the fazeel. The meta damascene the fazeel. The fazeel does not eat the meta. If someone exfoliate the fazeel and they need the fazeel then they need the meta. If someone exfoliate the meta then the meta is vulcanised. If someone damascene the fazeel and they need the meta then they do not like the fazeel. The meta does not need the meta.", "logic": "\nExfoliate(meta, fazeel)\nDamascene(meta, fazeel)\nnot Exfoliate(fazeel, meta)\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, fazeel) and Damascene(x, fazeel) -> Damascene(x, meta))\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, meta) -> Vulcanised(meta))\nforall x (Damascene(x, fazeel) and Damascene(x, meta) -> not Buccaneer(x, fazeel))\n\nnot Damascene(meta, meta)\n\nExfoliate(meta, fazeel) and Damascene(meta, fazeel) and forall x (Exfoliate(x, fazeel) and Damascene(x, fazeel) -> Damascene(x, meta)) -> therefore Damascene(meta, meta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The florry remake the dido. The florry pray the dido. The dido does not eat the florry. If someone remake the dido and they need the dido then they need the florry. If someone remake the florry then the florry is downstairs. If someone pray the dido and they need the florry then they do not like the dido. The florry does not like the dido.", "logic": "\nRemake(florry, dido)\nPray(florry, dido)\nnot Remake(dido, florry)\nforall x (Remake(x, dido) and Pray(x, dido) -> Pray(x, florry))\nforall x (Remake(x, florry) -> Downstairs(florry))\nforall x (Pray(x, dido) and Pray(x, florry) -> not Labialize(x, dido))\n\nnot Labialize(florry, dido)\n\nRemake(florry, dido) and Pray(florry, dido) and forall x (Remake(x, dido) and Pray(x, dido) -> Pray(x, florry)) -> therefore Pray(florry, florry) Pray(florry, dido) and Pray(florry, florry) and forall x (Pray(x, dido) and Pray(x, florry) -> not Labialize(x, dido)) -> therefore not Labialize(florry, dido)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The camille turn the rutledge. The camille perennate the rutledge. The rutledge does not eat the camille. If someone turn the rutledge and they need the rutledge then they need the camille. If someone turn the camille then the camille is shirty. If someone perennate the rutledge and they need the camille then they do not like the rutledge. The camille syncretize the rutledge.", "logic": "\nTurn(camille, rutledge)\nPerennate(camille, rutledge)\nnot Turn(rutledge, camille)\nforall x (Turn(x, rutledge) and Perennate(x, rutledge) -> Perennate(x, camille))\nforall x (Turn(x, camille) -> Shirty(camille))\nforall x (Perennate(x, rutledge) and Perennate(x, camille) -> not Syncretize(x, rutledge))\n\nSyncretize(camille, rutledge)\n\nTurn(camille, rutledge) and Perennate(camille, rutledge) and forall x (Turn(x, rutledge) and Perennate(x, rutledge) -> Perennate(x, camille)) -> therefore Perennate(camille, camille) Perennate(camille, rutledge) and Perennate(camille, camille) and forall x (Perennate(x, rutledge) and Perennate(x, camille) -> not Syncretize(x, rutledge)) -> therefore not Syncretize(camille, rutledge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The patty sclaff the rufe. The patty flavour the rufe. The rufe does not eat the patty. If someone sclaff the rufe and they need the rufe then they need the patty. If someone sclaff the patty then the patty is wayfaring. If someone flavour the rufe and they need the patty then they do not like the rufe. The patty is not wayfaring.", "logic": "\nSclaff(patty, rufe)\nFlavour(patty, rufe)\nnot Sclaff(rufe, patty)\nforall x (Sclaff(x, rufe) and Flavour(x, rufe) -> Flavour(x, patty))\nforall x (Sclaff(x, patty) -> Wayfaring(patty))\nforall x (Flavour(x, rufe) and Flavour(x, patty) -> not Recruit(x, rufe))\n\nnot Wayfaring(patty)\n\nforall x (Sclaff(x, patty) -> Wayfaring(patty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The olia liken the corly. The olia bell the corly. The corly does not eat the olia. If someone liken the corly and they need the corly then they need the olia. If someone liken the olia then the olia is coherent. If someone bell the corly and they need the olia then they do not like the corly. The corly bell the olia.", "logic": "\nLiken(olia, corly)\nBell(olia, corly)\nnot Liken(corly, olia)\nforall x (Liken(x, corly) and Bell(x, corly) -> Bell(x, olia))\nforall x (Liken(x, olia) -> Coherent(olia))\nforall x (Bell(x, corly) and Bell(x, olia) -> not Marry(x, corly))\n\nBell(corly, olia)\n\nforall x (Liken(x, corly) and Bell(x, corly) -> Bell(x, olia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The caesar japan the juliet. The caesar reexamine the juliet. The juliet does not eat the caesar. If someone japan the juliet and they need the juliet then they need the caesar. If someone japan the caesar then the caesar is nonionised. If someone reexamine the juliet and they need the caesar then they do not like the juliet. The juliet is not nonionised.", "logic": "\nJapan(caesar, juliet)\nReexamine(caesar, juliet)\nnot Japan(juliet, caesar)\nforall x (Japan(x, juliet) and Reexamine(x, juliet) -> Reexamine(x, caesar))\nforall x (Japan(x, caesar) -> Nonionised(caesar))\nforall x (Reexamine(x, juliet) and Reexamine(x, caesar) -> not Ransom(x, juliet))\n\nnot Nonionised(juliet)\n\nnot Nonionised(juliet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The cassondra cronk the deborah. The cassondra freshen the deborah. The deborah does not eat the cassondra. If someone cronk the deborah and they need the deborah then they need the cassondra. If someone cronk the cassondra then the cassondra is musical. If someone freshen the deborah and they need the cassondra then they do not like the deborah. The deborah narrate the cassondra.", "logic": "\nCronk(cassondra, deborah)\nFreshen(cassondra, deborah)\nnot Cronk(deborah, cassondra)\nforall x (Cronk(x, deborah) and Freshen(x, deborah) -> Freshen(x, cassondra))\nforall x (Cronk(x, cassondra) -> Musical(cassondra))\nforall x (Freshen(x, deborah) and Freshen(x, cassondra) -> not Narrate(x, deborah))\n\nNarrate(deborah, cassondra)\n\nNarrate(deborah, cassondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The elva wallpaper the vikky. The elva islamize the vikky. The vikky does not eat the elva. If someone wallpaper the vikky and they need the vikky then they need the elva. If someone wallpaper the elva then the elva is sorbed. If someone islamize the vikky and they need the elva then they do not like the vikky. The vikky is not green.", "logic": "\nWallpaper(elva, vikky)\nIslamize(elva, vikky)\nnot Wallpaper(vikky, elva)\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, vikky) and Islamize(x, vikky) -> Islamize(x, elva))\nforall x (Wallpaper(x, elva) -> Sorbed(elva))\nforall x (Islamize(x, vikky) and Islamize(x, elva) -> not Interlude(x, vikky))\n\nnot Green(vikky)\n\nnot Green(vikky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The anica palpate the pammie. The anica grain the pammie. The pammie does not eat the anica. If someone palpate the pammie and they need the pammie then they need the anica. If someone palpate the anica then the anica is vaporific. If someone grain the pammie and they need the anica then they do not like the pammie. The anica palpate the anica.", "logic": "\nPalpate(anica, pammie)\nGrain(anica, pammie)\nnot Palpate(pammie, anica)\nforall x (Palpate(x, pammie) and Grain(x, pammie) -> Grain(x, anica))\nforall x (Palpate(x, anica) -> Vaporific(anica))\nforall x (Grain(x, pammie) and Grain(x, anica) -> not Gang(x, pammie))\n\nPalpate(anica, anica)\n\nPalpate(anica, anica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1387"} {"premises": "The emmalee is nettled. The emmalee is untrusting. The emmalee is aided. The emmalee legislate the fraser. The emmalee bard the fraser. The fraser is nettled. The fraser is soapy. The fraser is dynamical. The fraser is aided. The fraser legislate the emmalee. The fraser prostrate the emmalee. The fraser bard the emmalee. If something prostrate the emmalee and the emmalee prostrate the fraser then the emmalee bard the fraser. If something legislate the fraser and the fraser legislate the emmalee then it prostrate the emmalee. If something prostrate the emmalee and it bard the fraser then it bard the emmalee. The emmalee bard the fraser.", "logic": "\nNettled(emmalee)\nUntrusting(emmalee)\nAided(emmalee)\nLegislate(emmalee, fraser)\nBard(emmalee, fraser)\nNettled(fraser)\nSoapy(fraser)\nDynamical(fraser)\nAided(fraser)\nLegislate(fraser, emmalee)\nProstrate(fraser, emmalee)\nBard(fraser, emmalee)\nforall x (Prostrate(x, emmalee) and Prostrate(emmalee, fraser) -> Bard(emmalee, fraser))\nforall x (Legislate(x, fraser) and Legislate(fraser, emmalee) -> Prostrate(x, emmalee))\nforall x (Prostrate(x, emmalee) and Bard(x, fraser) -> Bard(x, emmalee))\n\nBard(emmalee, fraser)\n\ntherefore Bard(emmalee, fraser)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The ertha is coequal. The ertha is impersonal. The ertha is catalatic. The ertha squat the tailor. The ertha groan the tailor. The tailor is coequal. The tailor is clashing. The tailor is referent. The tailor is catalatic. The tailor squat the ertha. The tailor flitter the ertha. The tailor groan the ertha. If something flitter the ertha and the ertha flitter the tailor then the ertha groan the tailor. If something squat the tailor and the tailor squat the ertha then it flitter the ertha. If something flitter the ertha and it groan the tailor then it groan the ertha. The tailor does not like the ertha.", "logic": "\nCoequal(ertha)\nImpersonal(ertha)\nCatalatic(ertha)\nSquat(ertha, tailor)\nGroan(ertha, tailor)\nCoequal(tailor)\nClashing(tailor)\nReferent(tailor)\nCatalatic(tailor)\nSquat(tailor, ertha)\nFlitter(tailor, ertha)\nGroan(tailor, ertha)\nforall x (Flitter(x, ertha) and Flitter(ertha, tailor) -> Groan(ertha, tailor))\nforall x (Squat(x, tailor) and Squat(tailor, ertha) -> Flitter(x, ertha))\nforall x (Flitter(x, ertha) and Groan(x, tailor) -> Groan(x, ertha))\n\nnot Squat(tailor, ertha)\n\ntherefore Squat(tailor, ertha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The theda is sodding. The theda is unextended. The theda is carbolated. The theda secede the yaakov. The theda metabolize the yaakov. The yaakov is sodding. The yaakov is disclosed. The yaakov is micro. The yaakov is carbolated. The yaakov secede the theda. The yaakov indite the theda. The yaakov metabolize the theda. If something indite the theda and the theda indite the yaakov then the theda metabolize the yaakov. If something secede the yaakov and the yaakov secede the theda then it indite the theda. If something indite the theda and it metabolize the yaakov then it metabolize the theda. The theda indite the theda.", "logic": "\nSodding(theda)\nUnextended(theda)\nCarbolated(theda)\nSecede(theda, yaakov)\nMetabolize(theda, yaakov)\nSodding(yaakov)\nDisclosed(yaakov)\nMicro(yaakov)\nCarbolated(yaakov)\nSecede(yaakov, theda)\nIndite(yaakov, theda)\nMetabolize(yaakov, theda)\nforall x (Indite(x, theda) and Indite(theda, yaakov) -> Metabolize(theda, yaakov))\nforall x (Secede(x, yaakov) and Secede(yaakov, theda) -> Indite(x, theda))\nforall x (Indite(x, theda) and Metabolize(x, yaakov) -> Metabolize(x, theda))\n\nIndite(theda, theda)\n\nSecede(theda, yaakov) and Secede(yaakov, theda) and forall x (Secede(x, yaakov) and Secede(yaakov, theda) -> Indite(x, theda)) -> therefore Indite(theda, theda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The shepperd is grassroots. The shepperd is newsworthy. The shepperd is woodsy. The shepperd relax the rivalee. The shepperd energise the rivalee. The rivalee is grassroots. The rivalee is aquiferous. The rivalee is lachrymose. The rivalee is woodsy. The rivalee relax the shepperd. The rivalee sheer the shepperd. The rivalee energise the shepperd. If something sheer the shepperd and the shepperd sheer the rivalee then the shepperd energise the rivalee. If something relax the rivalee and the rivalee relax the shepperd then it sheer the shepperd. If something sheer the shepperd and it energise the rivalee then it energise the shepperd. The shepperd does not see the shepperd.", "logic": "\nGrassroots(shepperd)\nNewsworthy(shepperd)\nWoodsy(shepperd)\nRelax(shepperd, rivalee)\nEnergise(shepperd, rivalee)\nGrassroots(rivalee)\nAquiferous(rivalee)\nLachrymose(rivalee)\nWoodsy(rivalee)\nRelax(rivalee, shepperd)\nSheer(rivalee, shepperd)\nEnergise(rivalee, shepperd)\nforall x (Sheer(x, shepperd) and Sheer(shepperd, rivalee) -> Energise(shepperd, rivalee))\nforall x (Relax(x, rivalee) and Relax(rivalee, shepperd) -> Sheer(x, shepperd))\nforall x (Sheer(x, shepperd) and Energise(x, rivalee) -> Energise(x, shepperd))\n\nnot Sheer(shepperd, shepperd)\n\nRelax(shepperd, rivalee) and Relax(rivalee, shepperd) and forall x (Relax(x, rivalee) and Relax(rivalee, shepperd) -> Sheer(x, shepperd)) -> therefore Sheer(shepperd, shepperd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The loni is fitter. The loni is orgiastic. The loni is ocular. The loni clinker the briggs. The loni bioassay the briggs. The briggs is fitter. The briggs is prox. The briggs is certain. The briggs is ocular. The briggs clinker the loni. The briggs predate the loni. The briggs bioassay the loni. If something predate the loni and the loni predate the briggs then the loni bioassay the briggs. If something clinker the briggs and the briggs clinker the loni then it predate the loni. If something predate the loni and it bioassay the briggs then it bioassay the loni. The loni bioassay the loni.", "logic": "\nFitter(loni)\nOrgiastic(loni)\nOcular(loni)\nClinker(loni, briggs)\nBioassay(loni, briggs)\nFitter(briggs)\nProx(briggs)\nCertain(briggs)\nOcular(briggs)\nClinker(briggs, loni)\nPredate(briggs, loni)\nBioassay(briggs, loni)\nforall x (Predate(x, loni) and Predate(loni, briggs) -> Bioassay(loni, briggs))\nforall x (Clinker(x, briggs) and Clinker(briggs, loni) -> Predate(x, loni))\nforall x (Predate(x, loni) and Bioassay(x, briggs) -> Bioassay(x, loni))\n\nBioassay(loni, loni)\n\nClinker(loni, briggs) and Clinker(briggs, loni) and forall x (Clinker(x, briggs) and Clinker(briggs, loni) -> Predate(x, loni)) -> therefore Predate(loni, loni) Predate(loni, loni) and Bioassay(loni, briggs) and forall x (Predate(x, loni) and Bioassay(x, briggs) -> Bioassay(x, loni)) -> therefore Bioassay(loni, loni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The abel is polynesian. The abel is dolomitic. The abel is abstruse. The abel control the briggs. The abel prettify the briggs. The briggs is polynesian. The briggs is faithful. The briggs is orderly. The briggs is abstruse. The briggs control the abel. The briggs splurge the abel. The briggs prettify the abel. If something splurge the abel and the abel splurge the briggs then the abel prettify the briggs. If something control the briggs and the briggs control the abel then it splurge the abel. If something splurge the abel and it prettify the briggs then it prettify the abel. The abel does not visit the abel.", "logic": "\nPolynesian(abel)\nDolomitic(abel)\nAbstruse(abel)\nControl(abel, briggs)\nPrettify(abel, briggs)\nPolynesian(briggs)\nFaithful(briggs)\nOrderly(briggs)\nAbstruse(briggs)\nControl(briggs, abel)\nSplurge(briggs, abel)\nPrettify(briggs, abel)\nforall x (Splurge(x, abel) and Splurge(abel, briggs) -> Prettify(abel, briggs))\nforall x (Control(x, briggs) and Control(briggs, abel) -> Splurge(x, abel))\nforall x (Splurge(x, abel) and Prettify(x, briggs) -> Prettify(x, abel))\n\nnot Prettify(abel, abel)\n\nControl(abel, briggs) and Control(briggs, abel) and forall x (Control(x, briggs) and Control(briggs, abel) -> Splurge(x, abel)) -> therefore Splurge(abel, abel) Splurge(abel, abel) and Prettify(abel, briggs) and forall x (Splurge(x, abel) and Prettify(x, briggs) -> Prettify(x, abel)) -> therefore Prettify(abel, abel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The abagail is alveolate. The abagail is illogical. The abagail is twilit. The abagail deck the marina. The abagail islamize the marina. The marina is alveolate. The marina is northbound. The marina is mycenaean. The marina is twilit. The marina deck the abagail. The marina french the abagail. The marina islamize the abagail. If something french the abagail and the abagail french the marina then the abagail islamize the marina. If something deck the marina and the marina deck the abagail then it french the abagail. If something french the abagail and it islamize the marina then it islamize the abagail. The marina does not like the marina.", "logic": "\nAlveolate(abagail)\nIllogical(abagail)\nTwilit(abagail)\nDeck(abagail, marina)\nIslamize(abagail, marina)\nAlveolate(marina)\nNorthbound(marina)\nMycenaean(marina)\nTwilit(marina)\nDeck(marina, abagail)\nFrench(marina, abagail)\nIslamize(marina, abagail)\nforall x (French(x, abagail) and French(abagail, marina) -> Islamize(abagail, marina))\nforall x (Deck(x, marina) and Deck(marina, abagail) -> French(x, abagail))\nforall x (French(x, abagail) and Islamize(x, marina) -> Islamize(x, abagail))\n\nnot Deck(marina, marina)\n\nnot Deck(marina, marina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The gerianna is alimentary. The gerianna is sexless. The gerianna is untamed. The gerianna tutor the patin. The gerianna intervene the patin. The patin is alimentary. The patin is sharp. The patin is incautious. The patin is untamed. The patin tutor the gerianna. The patin carnalise the gerianna. The patin intervene the gerianna. If something carnalise the gerianna and the gerianna carnalise the patin then the gerianna intervene the patin. If something tutor the patin and the patin tutor the gerianna then it carnalise the gerianna. If something carnalise the gerianna and it intervene the patin then it intervene the gerianna. The gerianna is incautious.", "logic": "\nAlimentary(gerianna)\nSexless(gerianna)\nUntamed(gerianna)\nTutor(gerianna, patin)\nIntervene(gerianna, patin)\nAlimentary(patin)\nSharp(patin)\nIncautious(patin)\nUntamed(patin)\nTutor(patin, gerianna)\nCarnalise(patin, gerianna)\nIntervene(patin, gerianna)\nforall x (Carnalise(x, gerianna) and Carnalise(gerianna, patin) -> Intervene(gerianna, patin))\nforall x (Tutor(x, patin) and Tutor(patin, gerianna) -> Carnalise(x, gerianna))\nforall x (Carnalise(x, gerianna) and Intervene(x, patin) -> Intervene(x, gerianna))\n\nIncautious(gerianna)\n\nIncautious(gerianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The olaf is coltish. The olaf is absorptive. The olaf is crenulate. The olaf distrust the caitlin. The olaf replete the caitlin. The caitlin is coltish. The caitlin is basilar. The caitlin is chaetal. The caitlin is crenulate. The caitlin distrust the olaf. The caitlin date the olaf. The caitlin replete the olaf. If something date the olaf and the olaf date the caitlin then the olaf replete the caitlin. If something distrust the caitlin and the caitlin distrust the olaf then it date the olaf. If something date the olaf and it replete the caitlin then it replete the olaf. The caitlin does not visit the caitlin.", "logic": "\nColtish(olaf)\nAbsorptive(olaf)\nCrenulate(olaf)\nDistrust(olaf, caitlin)\nReplete(olaf, caitlin)\nColtish(caitlin)\nBasilar(caitlin)\nChaetal(caitlin)\nCrenulate(caitlin)\nDistrust(caitlin, olaf)\nDate(caitlin, olaf)\nReplete(caitlin, olaf)\nforall x (Date(x, olaf) and Date(olaf, caitlin) -> Replete(olaf, caitlin))\nforall x (Distrust(x, caitlin) and Distrust(caitlin, olaf) -> Date(x, olaf))\nforall x (Date(x, olaf) and Replete(x, caitlin) -> Replete(x, olaf))\n\nnot Replete(caitlin, caitlin)\n\nnot Replete(caitlin, caitlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The kalila is chainlike. The kalila is retentive. The kalila is steepish. The kalila unmask the prudence. The kalila blackwash the prudence. The prudence is chainlike. The prudence is bilgy. The prudence is dreary. The prudence is steepish. The prudence unmask the kalila. The prudence lather the kalila. The prudence blackwash the kalila. If something lather the kalila and the kalila lather the prudence then the kalila blackwash the prudence. If something unmask the prudence and the prudence unmask the kalila then it lather the kalila. If something lather the kalila and it blackwash the prudence then it blackwash the kalila. The kalila unmask the kalila.", "logic": "\nChainlike(kalila)\nRetentive(kalila)\nSteepish(kalila)\nUnmask(kalila, prudence)\nBlackwash(kalila, prudence)\nChainlike(prudence)\nBilgy(prudence)\nDreary(prudence)\nSteepish(prudence)\nUnmask(prudence, kalila)\nLather(prudence, kalila)\nBlackwash(prudence, kalila)\nforall x (Lather(x, kalila) and Lather(kalila, prudence) -> Blackwash(kalila, prudence))\nforall x (Unmask(x, prudence) and Unmask(prudence, kalila) -> Lather(x, kalila))\nforall x (Lather(x, kalila) and Blackwash(x, prudence) -> Blackwash(x, kalila))\n\nUnmask(kalila, kalila)\n\nUnmask(kalila, kalila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The parwane is choked. The parwane is opaque. The parwane is polychrome. The parwane intensify the amadeus. The parwane wander the amadeus. The amadeus is choked. The amadeus is genetic. The amadeus is isomorphic. The amadeus is polychrome. The amadeus intensify the parwane. The amadeus pinpoint the parwane. The amadeus wander the parwane. If something pinpoint the parwane and the parwane pinpoint the amadeus then the parwane wander the amadeus. If something intensify the amadeus and the amadeus intensify the parwane then it pinpoint the parwane. If something pinpoint the parwane and it wander the amadeus then it wander the parwane. The parwane does not see the amadeus.", "logic": "\nChoked(parwane)\nOpaque(parwane)\nPolychrome(parwane)\nIntensify(parwane, amadeus)\nWander(parwane, amadeus)\nChoked(amadeus)\nGenetic(amadeus)\nIsomorphic(amadeus)\nPolychrome(amadeus)\nIntensify(amadeus, parwane)\nPinpoint(amadeus, parwane)\nWander(amadeus, parwane)\nforall x (Pinpoint(x, parwane) and Pinpoint(parwane, amadeus) -> Wander(parwane, amadeus))\nforall x (Intensify(x, amadeus) and Intensify(amadeus, parwane) -> Pinpoint(x, parwane))\nforall x (Pinpoint(x, parwane) and Wander(x, amadeus) -> Wander(x, parwane))\n\nnot Pinpoint(parwane, amadeus)\n\nnot Pinpoint(parwane, amadeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The nissy is prejudiced. The nissy is swinish. The nissy is slavish. The nissy snog the fletcher. The nissy crimp the fletcher. The fletcher is prejudiced. The fletcher is hick. The fletcher is bulgarian. The fletcher is slavish. The fletcher snog the nissy. The fletcher preisolate the nissy. The fletcher crimp the nissy. If something preisolate the nissy and the nissy preisolate the fletcher then the nissy crimp the fletcher. If something snog the fletcher and the fletcher snog the nissy then it preisolate the nissy. If something preisolate the nissy and it crimp the fletcher then it crimp the nissy. The fletcher preisolate the fletcher.", "logic": "\nPrejudiced(nissy)\nSwinish(nissy)\nSlavish(nissy)\nSnog(nissy, fletcher)\nCrimp(nissy, fletcher)\nPrejudiced(fletcher)\nHick(fletcher)\nBulgarian(fletcher)\nSlavish(fletcher)\nSnog(fletcher, nissy)\nPreisolate(fletcher, nissy)\nCrimp(fletcher, nissy)\nforall x (Preisolate(x, nissy) and Preisolate(nissy, fletcher) -> Crimp(nissy, fletcher))\nforall x (Snog(x, fletcher) and Snog(fletcher, nissy) -> Preisolate(x, nissy))\nforall x (Preisolate(x, nissy) and Crimp(x, fletcher) -> Crimp(x, nissy))\n\nPreisolate(fletcher, fletcher)\n\nPreisolate(fletcher, fletcher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1598"} {"premises": "The hendrika is tabby. The caria atomize the hendrika. The rosella consult the caria. If someone is requested then they visit the hendrika. If someone is tabby then they are requested. If someone atomize the hendrika and the hendrika is puckish then the hendrika consult the caria. The caria atomize the hendrika.", "logic": "\nTabby(hendrika)\nAtomize(caria, hendrika)\nConsult(rosella, caria)\nforall x (Requested(x) -> Atomize(x, hendrika))\nforall x (Tabby(x) -> Requested(x))\nforall x (Atomize(x, hendrika) and Puckish(hendrika) -> Consult(hendrika, caria))\n\nAtomize(caria, hendrika)\n\ntherefore Atomize(caria, hendrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The zeus is unreleased. The spenser pulp the zeus. The antonie attempt the spenser. If someone is inspired then they visit the zeus. If someone is unreleased then they are inspired. If someone pulp the zeus and the zeus is arachnoid then the zeus attempt the spenser. The spenser does not visit the zeus.", "logic": "\nUnreleased(zeus)\nPulp(spenser, zeus)\nAttempt(antonie, spenser)\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Pulp(x, zeus))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) -> Inspired(x))\nforall x (Pulp(x, zeus) and Arachnoid(zeus) -> Attempt(zeus, spenser))\n\nnot Pulp(spenser, zeus)\n\ntherefore Pulp(spenser, zeus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The magdaia is unstinting. The abel retrovert the magdaia. The randy repeat the abel. If someone is anagogic then they visit the magdaia. If someone is unstinting then they are anagogic. If someone retrovert the magdaia and the magdaia is cryogenic then the magdaia repeat the abel. The magdaia is anagogic.", "logic": "\nUnstinting(magdaia)\nRetrovert(abel, magdaia)\nRepeat(randy, abel)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Retrovert(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Anagogic(x))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, magdaia) and Cryogenic(magdaia) -> Repeat(magdaia, abel))\n\nAnagogic(magdaia)\n\nUnstinting(magdaia) and forall x (Unstinting(x) -> Anagogic(x)) -> therefore Anagogic(magdaia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The flipper is buddhist. The samuella sign the flipper. The jaquelyn tell the samuella. If someone is joking then they visit the flipper. If someone is buddhist then they are joking. If someone sign the flipper and the flipper is essential then the flipper tell the samuella. The flipper is not joking.", "logic": "\nBuddhist(flipper)\nSign(samuella, flipper)\nTell(jaquelyn, samuella)\nforall x (Joking(x) -> Sign(x, flipper))\nforall x (Buddhist(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Sign(x, flipper) and Essential(flipper) -> Tell(flipper, samuella))\n\nnot Joking(flipper)\n\nBuddhist(flipper) and forall x (Buddhist(x) -> Joking(x)) -> therefore Joking(flipper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The adaline is snappish. The cati readjust the adaline. The gertrud rubric the cati. If someone is catalectic then they visit the adaline. If someone is snappish then they are catalectic. If someone readjust the adaline and the adaline is splay then the adaline rubric the cati. The adaline readjust the adaline.", "logic": "\nSnappish(adaline)\nReadjust(cati, adaline)\nRubric(gertrud, cati)\nforall x (Catalectic(x) -> Readjust(x, adaline))\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Readjust(x, adaline) and Splay(adaline) -> Rubric(adaline, cati))\n\nReadjust(adaline, adaline)\n\nSnappish(adaline) and forall x (Snappish(x) -> Catalectic(x)) -> therefore Catalectic(adaline) Catalectic(adaline) and forall x (Catalectic(x) -> Readjust(x, adaline)) -> therefore Readjust(adaline, adaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The ethel is contested. The keil worry the ethel. The julietta oxidise the keil. If someone is unctuous then they visit the ethel. If someone is contested then they are unctuous. If someone worry the ethel and the ethel is moldable then the ethel oxidise the keil. The ethel does not visit the ethel.", "logic": "\nContested(ethel)\nWorry(keil, ethel)\nOxidise(julietta, keil)\nforall x (Unctuous(x) -> Worry(x, ethel))\nforall x (Contested(x) -> Unctuous(x))\nforall x (Worry(x, ethel) and Moldable(ethel) -> Oxidise(ethel, keil))\n\nnot Worry(ethel, ethel)\n\nContested(ethel) and forall x (Contested(x) -> Unctuous(x)) -> therefore Unctuous(ethel) Unctuous(ethel) and forall x (Unctuous(x) -> Worry(x, ethel)) -> therefore Worry(ethel, ethel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The plato is fizzy. The osbert screen the plato. The marlene binge the osbert. If someone is pathologic then they visit the plato. If someone is fizzy then they are pathologic. If someone screen the plato and the plato is whiplike then the plato binge the osbert. The marlene does not visit the plato.", "logic": "\nFizzy(plato)\nScreen(osbert, plato)\nBinge(marlene, osbert)\nforall x (Pathologic(x) -> Screen(x, plato))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Pathologic(x))\nforall x (Screen(x, plato) and Whiplike(plato) -> Binge(plato, osbert))\n\nnot Screen(marlene, plato)\n\nforall x (Pathologic(x) -> Screen(x, plato)) <- forall x (Fizzy(x) -> Pathologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The marilee is other. The farrand vitriol the marilee. The wendy extrude the farrand. If someone is afferent then they visit the marilee. If someone is other then they are afferent. If someone vitriol the marilee and the marilee is riblike then the marilee extrude the farrand. The wendy is afferent.", "logic": "\nOther(marilee)\nVitriol(farrand, marilee)\nExtrude(wendy, farrand)\nforall x (Afferent(x) -> Vitriol(x, marilee))\nforall x (Other(x) -> Afferent(x))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, marilee) and Riblike(marilee) -> Extrude(marilee, farrand))\n\nAfferent(wendy)\n\nforall x (Other(x) -> Afferent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The amberly is diffused. The ester fellate the amberly. The buck quetch the ester. If someone is bicuspid then they visit the amberly. If someone is diffused then they are bicuspid. If someone fellate the amberly and the amberly is topknotted then the amberly quetch the ester. The amberly does not chase the ester.", "logic": "\nDiffused(amberly)\nFellate(ester, amberly)\nQuetch(buck, ester)\nforall x (Bicuspid(x) -> Fellate(x, amberly))\nforall x (Diffused(x) -> Bicuspid(x))\nforall x (Fellate(x, amberly) and Topknotted(amberly) -> Quetch(amberly, ester))\n\nnot Quetch(amberly, ester)\n\nforall x (Fellate(x, amberly) and Topknotted(amberly) -> Quetch(amberly, ester)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The katy is neglected. The kimmie blitzkrieg the katy. The saudra mismanage the kimmie. If someone is engrossing then they visit the katy. If someone is neglected then they are engrossing. If someone blitzkrieg the katy and the katy is turkic then the katy mismanage the kimmie. The saudra mismanage the katy.", "logic": "\nNeglected(katy)\nBlitzkrieg(kimmie, katy)\nMismanage(saudra, kimmie)\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> Blitzkrieg(x, katy))\nforall x (Neglected(x) -> Engrossing(x))\nforall x (Blitzkrieg(x, katy) and Turkic(katy) -> Mismanage(katy, kimmie))\n\nMismanage(saudra, katy)\n\nMismanage(saudra, katy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The winifield is signal. The gustie will the winifield. The ally bask the gustie. If someone is pinkish then they visit the winifield. If someone is signal then they are pinkish. If someone will the winifield and the winifield is pyknic then the winifield bask the gustie. The gustie does not visit the ally.", "logic": "\nSignal(winifield)\nWill(gustie, winifield)\nBask(ally, gustie)\nforall x (Pinkish(x) -> Will(x, winifield))\nforall x (Signal(x) -> Pinkish(x))\nforall x (Will(x, winifield) and Pyknic(winifield) -> Bask(winifield, gustie))\n\nnot Will(gustie, ally)\n\nnot Will(gustie, ally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The sanders is exuberant. The hill subjugate the sanders. The bartie wobble the hill. If someone is viewable then they visit the sanders. If someone is exuberant then they are viewable. If someone subjugate the sanders and the sanders is charmed then the sanders wobble the hill. The bartie subjugate the hill.", "logic": "\nExuberant(sanders)\nSubjugate(hill, sanders)\nWobble(bartie, hill)\nforall x (Viewable(x) -> Subjugate(x, sanders))\nforall x (Exuberant(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Subjugate(x, sanders) and Charmed(sanders) -> Wobble(sanders, hill))\n\nSubjugate(bartie, hill)\n\nSubjugate(bartie, hill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "Giff is elongated. Giff is moresque. Giff is casteless. Round, casteless things are edged. If something is casteless and edged then it is antimonial. All casteless things are antimonial. All moresque things are casteless. Green things are elongated. All provident, edged things are elongated. Giff is casteless.", "logic": "\nElongated(giff)\nMoresque(giff)\nCasteless(giff)\nforall x (Antimonial(x) and Casteless(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Casteless(x) and Edged(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Moresque(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Edged(x) -> Elongated(x))\nforall x (Provident(x) and Edged(x) -> Elongated(x))\n\nCasteless(giff)\n\ntherefore Casteless(giff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Weston is runcinate. Weston is bionomic. Weston is ametropic. Round, ametropic things are lecherous. If something is ametropic and lecherous then it is cuprous. All ametropic things are cuprous. All bionomic things are ametropic. Green things are runcinate. All buzzing, lecherous things are runcinate. Weston is not runcinate.", "logic": "\nRuncinate(weston)\nBionomic(weston)\nAmetropic(weston)\nforall x (Cuprous(x) and Ametropic(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nforall x (Ametropic(x) and Lecherous(x) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Ametropic(x) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Bionomic(x) -> Ametropic(x))\nforall x (Lecherous(x) -> Runcinate(x))\nforall x (Buzzing(x) and Lecherous(x) -> Runcinate(x))\n\nnot Runcinate(weston)\n\ntherefore Runcinate(weston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Malvina is brooding. Malvina is utility. Malvina is bronchial. Round, bronchial things are bluff. If something is bronchial and bluff then it is actuarial. All bronchial things are actuarial. All utility things are bronchial. Green things are brooding. All mailed, bluff things are brooding. Malvina is actuarial.", "logic": "\nBrooding(malvina)\nUtility(malvina)\nBronchial(malvina)\nforall x (Actuarial(x) and Bronchial(x) -> Bluff(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) and Bluff(x) -> Actuarial(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Actuarial(x))\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Bluff(x) -> Brooding(x))\nforall x (Mailed(x) and Bluff(x) -> Brooding(x))\n\nActuarial(malvina)\n\nBronchial(malvina) and forall x (Bronchial(x) -> Actuarial(x)) -> therefore Actuarial(malvina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Clarey is agonistic. Clarey is undulatory. Clarey is aleuronic. Round, aleuronic things are fleeceable. If something is aleuronic and fleeceable then it is unneurotic. All aleuronic things are unneurotic. All undulatory things are aleuronic. Green things are agonistic. All evanescent, fleeceable things are agonistic. Clarey is not unneurotic.", "logic": "\nAgonistic(clarey)\nUndulatory(clarey)\nAleuronic(clarey)\nforall x (Unneurotic(x) and Aleuronic(x) -> Fleeceable(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Fleeceable(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Undulatory(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nforall x (Fleeceable(x) -> Agonistic(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) and Fleeceable(x) -> Agonistic(x))\n\nnot Unneurotic(clarey)\n\nAleuronic(clarey) and forall x (Aleuronic(x) -> Unneurotic(x)) -> therefore Unneurotic(clarey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Caprice is madcap. Caprice is toupeed. Caprice is cyanogenic. Round, cyanogenic things are tillable. If something is cyanogenic and tillable then it is chilly. All cyanogenic things are chilly. All toupeed things are cyanogenic. Green things are madcap. All synthetic, tillable things are madcap. Caprice is tillable.", "logic": "\nMadcap(caprice)\nToupeed(caprice)\nCyanogenic(caprice)\nforall x (Chilly(x) and Cyanogenic(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Tillable(x) -> Chilly(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) -> Chilly(x))\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nforall x (Tillable(x) -> Madcap(x))\nforall x (Synthetic(x) and Tillable(x) -> Madcap(x))\n\nTillable(caprice)\n\nCyanogenic(caprice) and forall x (Cyanogenic(x) -> Chilly(x)) -> therefore Chilly(caprice) Chilly(caprice) and Cyanogenic(caprice) and forall x (Chilly(x) and Cyanogenic(x) -> Tillable(x)) -> therefore Tillable(caprice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Reuven is cohesive. Reuven is terse. Reuven is polyglot. Round, polyglot things are most. If something is polyglot and most then it is robotic. All polyglot things are robotic. All terse things are polyglot. Green things are cohesive. All desirable, most things are cohesive. Reuven is not most.", "logic": "\nCohesive(reuven)\nTerse(reuven)\nPolyglot(reuven)\nforall x (Robotic(x) and Polyglot(x) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) and Most(x) -> Robotic(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) -> Robotic(x))\nforall x (Terse(x) -> Polyglot(x))\nforall x (Most(x) -> Cohesive(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and Most(x) -> Cohesive(x))\n\nnot Most(reuven)\n\nPolyglot(reuven) and forall x (Polyglot(x) -> Robotic(x)) -> therefore Robotic(reuven) Robotic(reuven) and Polyglot(reuven) and forall x (Robotic(x) and Polyglot(x) -> Most(x)) -> therefore Most(reuven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Ellissa is insular. Ellissa is decrepit. Ellissa is westward. Round, westward things are staminate. If something is westward and staminate then it is medullary. All westward things are medullary. All decrepit things are westward. Green things are insular. All vicarious, staminate things are insular. Ellissa is not young.", "logic": "\nInsular(ellissa)\nDecrepit(ellissa)\nWestward(ellissa)\nforall x (Medullary(x) and Westward(x) -> Staminate(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) and Staminate(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Decrepit(x) -> Westward(x))\nforall x (Staminate(x) -> Insular(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) and Staminate(x) -> Insular(x))\n\nnot Young(ellissa)\n\nnot Young(ellissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Lefty is hottish. Lefty is assertive. Lefty is stunned. Round, stunned things are murmurous. If something is stunned and murmurous then it is fetal. All stunned things are fetal. All assertive things are stunned. Green things are hottish. All tough, murmurous things are hottish. Lefty is tough.", "logic": "\nHottish(lefty)\nAssertive(lefty)\nStunned(lefty)\nforall x (Fetal(x) and Stunned(x) -> Murmurous(x))\nforall x (Stunned(x) and Murmurous(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Stunned(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) -> Stunned(x))\nforall x (Murmurous(x) -> Hottish(x))\nforall x (Tough(x) and Murmurous(x) -> Hottish(x))\n\nTough(lefty)\n\nTough(lefty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-966"} {"premises": "Valli is acephalous. Hanni is tenable. Kathlene is tenable. Rubin is bereaved. All owing people are acephalous. If Kathlene is acephalous then Kathlene is owing. If someone is tenable then they are bereaved. If Kathlene is plausive and Kathlene is acephalous then Kathlene is uncordial. All arthritic, bereaved people are plausive. All tenable people are owing. White people are uncordial. If someone is owing and plausive then they are acephalous. Valli is acephalous.", "logic": "\nAcephalous(valli)\nTenable(hanni)\nTenable(kathlene)\nBereaved(rubin)\nforall x (Owing(x) -> Acephalous(x))\nAcephalous(kathlene) -> Owing(kathlene)\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nPlausive(kathlene) and Acephalous(kathlene) -> Uncordial(kathlene)\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and Bereaved(x) -> Plausive(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Owing(x))\nforall x (Owing(x) -> Uncordial(x))\nforall x (Owing(x) and Plausive(x) -> Acephalous(x))\n\nAcephalous(valli)\n\ntherefore Acephalous(valli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Lacie is salientian. Julio is respectful. Warden is respectful. Lucilia is syncopated. All sanguine people are salientian. If Warden is salientian then Warden is sanguine. If someone is respectful then they are syncopated. If Warden is montane and Warden is salientian then Warden is flashy. All precordial, syncopated people are montane. All respectful people are sanguine. White people are flashy. If someone is sanguine and montane then they are salientian. Julio is not respectful.", "logic": "\nSalientian(lacie)\nRespectful(julio)\nRespectful(warden)\nSyncopated(lucilia)\nforall x (Sanguine(x) -> Salientian(x))\nSalientian(warden) -> Sanguine(warden)\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nMontane(warden) and Salientian(warden) -> Flashy(warden)\nforall x (Precordial(x) and Syncopated(x) -> Montane(x))\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> Sanguine(x))\nforall x (Sanguine(x) -> Flashy(x))\nforall x (Sanguine(x) and Montane(x) -> Salientian(x))\n\nnot Respectful(julio)\n\ntherefore Respectful(julio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Jermaine is cyclical. Ioana is isosmotic. Kaari is isosmotic. Herby is thrown. All delectable people are cyclical. If Kaari is cyclical then Kaari is delectable. If someone is isosmotic then they are thrown. If Kaari is maledict and Kaari is cyclical then Kaari is stabbing. All logistic, thrown people are maledict. All isosmotic people are delectable. White people are stabbing. If someone is delectable and maledict then they are cyclical. Ioana is thrown.", "logic": "\nCyclical(jermaine)\nIsosmotic(ioana)\nIsosmotic(kaari)\nThrown(herby)\nforall x (Delectable(x) -> Cyclical(x))\nCyclical(kaari) -> Delectable(kaari)\nforall x (Isosmotic(x) -> Thrown(x))\nMaledict(kaari) and Cyclical(kaari) -> Stabbing(kaari)\nforall x (Logistic(x) and Thrown(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Isosmotic(x) -> Delectable(x))\nforall x (Delectable(x) -> Stabbing(x))\nforall x (Delectable(x) and Maledict(x) -> Cyclical(x))\n\nThrown(ioana)\n\nIsosmotic(ioana) and forall x (Isosmotic(x) -> Thrown(x)) -> therefore Thrown(ioana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Rockwell is ethnical. Gwendolyn is frilled. Dulcine is frilled. Aurea is excited. All hexagonal people are ethnical. If Dulcine is ethnical then Dulcine is hexagonal. If someone is frilled then they are excited. If Dulcine is cheery and Dulcine is ethnical then Dulcine is mellow. All uninvited, excited people are cheery. All frilled people are hexagonal. White people are mellow. If someone is hexagonal and cheery then they are ethnical. Dulcine is not hexagonal.", "logic": "\nEthnical(rockwell)\nFrilled(gwendolyn)\nFrilled(dulcine)\nExcited(aurea)\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) -> Ethnical(x))\nEthnical(dulcine) -> Hexagonal(dulcine)\nforall x (Frilled(x) -> Excited(x))\nCheery(dulcine) and Ethnical(dulcine) -> Mellow(dulcine)\nforall x (Uninvited(x) and Excited(x) -> Cheery(x))\nforall x (Frilled(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) -> Mellow(x))\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) and Cheery(x) -> Ethnical(x))\n\nnot Hexagonal(dulcine)\n\nFrilled(dulcine) and forall x (Frilled(x) -> Hexagonal(x)) -> therefore Hexagonal(dulcine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Lydia is dextrous. Georgiana is lordless. Celinka is lordless. Damian is dowdy. All principal people are dextrous. If Celinka is dextrous then Celinka is principal. If someone is lordless then they are dowdy. If Celinka is lapidarian and Celinka is dextrous then Celinka is appressed. All spacy, dowdy people are lapidarian. All lordless people are principal. White people are appressed. If someone is principal and lapidarian then they are dextrous. Celinka is appressed.", "logic": "\nDextrous(lydia)\nLordless(georgiana)\nLordless(celinka)\nDowdy(damian)\nforall x (Principal(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nDextrous(celinka) -> Principal(celinka)\nforall x (Lordless(x) -> Dowdy(x))\nLapidarian(celinka) and Dextrous(celinka) -> Appressed(celinka)\nforall x (Spacy(x) and Dowdy(x) -> Lapidarian(x))\nforall x (Lordless(x) -> Principal(x))\nforall x (Principal(x) -> Appressed(x))\nforall x (Principal(x) and Lapidarian(x) -> Dextrous(x))\n\nAppressed(celinka)\n\nLordless(celinka) and forall x (Lordless(x) -> Principal(x)) -> therefore Principal(celinka) Principal(celinka) and forall x (Principal(x) -> Appressed(x)) -> therefore Appressed(celinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Darryl is excited. Tandie is terefah. Pacifica is terefah. Clementia is hebraic. All unforeseen people are excited. If Pacifica is excited then Pacifica is unforeseen. If someone is terefah then they are hebraic. If Pacifica is unhurt and Pacifica is excited then Pacifica is tractive. All mesmerized, hebraic people are unhurt. All terefah people are unforeseen. White people are tractive. If someone is unforeseen and unhurt then they are excited. Pacifica is not excited.", "logic": "\nExcited(darryl)\nTerefah(tandie)\nTerefah(pacifica)\nHebraic(clementia)\nforall x (Unforeseen(x) -> Excited(x))\nExcited(pacifica) -> Unforeseen(pacifica)\nforall x (Terefah(x) -> Hebraic(x))\nUnhurt(pacifica) and Excited(pacifica) -> Tractive(pacifica)\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Unhurt(x))\nforall x (Terefah(x) -> Unforeseen(x))\nforall x (Unforeseen(x) -> Tractive(x))\nforall x (Unforeseen(x) and Unhurt(x) -> Excited(x))\n\nnot Excited(pacifica)\n\nTerefah(pacifica) and forall x (Terefah(x) -> Unforeseen(x)) -> therefore Unforeseen(pacifica) Unforeseen(pacifica) and forall x (Unforeseen(x) -> Excited(x)) -> therefore Excited(pacifica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Eugenia is bootless. Donn is vestibular. Emmalynne is vestibular. Hank is manque. All adaptive people are bootless. If Emmalynne is bootless then Emmalynne is adaptive. If someone is vestibular then they are manque. If Emmalynne is webby and Emmalynne is bootless then Emmalynne is lazy. All vagile, manque people are webby. All vestibular people are adaptive. White people are lazy. If someone is adaptive and webby then they are bootless. Eugenia is not manque.", "logic": "\nBootless(eugenia)\nVestibular(donn)\nVestibular(emmalynne)\nManque(hank)\nforall x (Adaptive(x) -> Bootless(x))\nBootless(emmalynne) -> Adaptive(emmalynne)\nforall x (Vestibular(x) -> Manque(x))\nWebby(emmalynne) and Bootless(emmalynne) -> Lazy(emmalynne)\nforall x (Vagile(x) and Manque(x) -> Webby(x))\nforall x (Vestibular(x) -> Adaptive(x))\nforall x (Adaptive(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Adaptive(x) and Webby(x) -> Bootless(x))\n\nnot Manque(eugenia)\n\nforall x (Vestibular(x) -> Manque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "August is ruritanian. Brittany is schematic. Darius is schematic. Devin is packable. All roughdried people are ruritanian. If Darius is ruritanian then Darius is roughdried. If someone is schematic then they are packable. If Darius is unalloyed and Darius is ruritanian then Darius is isometric. All christlike, packable people are unalloyed. All schematic people are roughdried. White people are isometric. If someone is roughdried and unalloyed then they are ruritanian. Darius is unalloyed.", "logic": "\nRuritanian(august)\nSchematic(brittany)\nSchematic(darius)\nPackable(devin)\nforall x (Roughdried(x) -> Ruritanian(x))\nRuritanian(darius) -> Roughdried(darius)\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Packable(x))\nUnalloyed(darius) and Ruritanian(darius) -> Isometric(darius)\nforall x (Christlike(x) and Packable(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Roughdried(x) -> Isometric(x))\nforall x (Roughdried(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> Ruritanian(x))\n\nUnalloyed(darius)\n\nforall x (Christlike(x) and Packable(x) -> Unalloyed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Lorrayne is chitinous. Brad is immediate. Ajai is immediate. Tricia is wifelike. All mincing people are chitinous. If Ajai is chitinous then Ajai is mincing. If someone is immediate then they are wifelike. If Ajai is mullioned and Ajai is chitinous then Ajai is expert. All ballistic, wifelike people are mullioned. All immediate people are mincing. White people are expert. If someone is mincing and mullioned then they are chitinous. Tricia is not expert.", "logic": "\nChitinous(lorrayne)\nImmediate(brad)\nImmediate(ajai)\nWifelike(tricia)\nforall x (Mincing(x) -> Chitinous(x))\nChitinous(ajai) -> Mincing(ajai)\nforall x (Immediate(x) -> Wifelike(x))\nMullioned(ajai) and Chitinous(ajai) -> Expert(ajai)\nforall x (Ballistic(x) and Wifelike(x) -> Mullioned(x))\nforall x (Immediate(x) -> Mincing(x))\nforall x (Mincing(x) -> Expert(x))\nforall x (Mincing(x) and Mullioned(x) -> Chitinous(x))\n\nnot Expert(tricia)\n\nforall x (Mincing(x) -> Expert(x)) <- forall x (Immediate(x) -> Mincing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Endora is majestic. Mirella is demoniac. Marta is demoniac. Staford is statute. All moravian people are majestic. If Marta is majestic then Marta is moravian. If someone is demoniac then they are statute. If Marta is apogametic and Marta is majestic then Marta is vesical. All afebrile, statute people are apogametic. All demoniac people are moravian. White people are vesical. If someone is moravian and apogametic then they are majestic. Mirella is afebrile.", "logic": "\nMajestic(endora)\nDemoniac(mirella)\nDemoniac(marta)\nStatute(staford)\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> Majestic(x))\nMajestic(marta) -> Moravian(marta)\nforall x (Demoniac(x) -> Statute(x))\nApogametic(marta) and Majestic(marta) -> Vesical(marta)\nforall x (Afebrile(x) and Statute(x) -> Apogametic(x))\nforall x (Demoniac(x) -> Moravian(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> Vesical(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) and Apogametic(x) -> Majestic(x))\n\nAfebrile(mirella)\n\nAfebrile(mirella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Dominick is northern. Jude is antic. Charles is antic. Philip is nescient. All accoutred people are northern. If Charles is northern then Charles is accoutred. If someone is antic then they are nescient. If Charles is triennial and Charles is northern then Charles is unsuitable. All leavened, nescient people are triennial. All antic people are accoutred. White people are unsuitable. If someone is accoutred and triennial then they are northern. Charles is not leavened.", "logic": "\nNorthern(dominick)\nAntic(jude)\nAntic(charles)\nNescient(philip)\nforall x (Accoutred(x) -> Northern(x))\nNorthern(charles) -> Accoutred(charles)\nforall x (Antic(x) -> Nescient(x))\nTriennial(charles) and Northern(charles) -> Unsuitable(charles)\nforall x (Leavened(x) and Nescient(x) -> Triennial(x))\nforall x (Antic(x) -> Accoutred(x))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) and Triennial(x) -> Northern(x))\n\nnot Leavened(charles)\n\nnot Leavened(charles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Gerrie is khaki. Chandra is nonchalant. Judd is nonchalant. Travis is stemless. All secretive people are khaki. If Judd is khaki then Judd is secretive. If someone is nonchalant then they are stemless. If Judd is neighborly and Judd is khaki then Judd is standing. All mellowed, stemless people are neighborly. All nonchalant people are secretive. White people are standing. If someone is secretive and neighborly then they are khaki. Travis is nonchalant.", "logic": "\nKhaki(gerrie)\nNonchalant(chandra)\nNonchalant(judd)\nStemless(travis)\nforall x (Secretive(x) -> Khaki(x))\nKhaki(judd) -> Secretive(judd)\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) -> Stemless(x))\nNeighborly(judd) and Khaki(judd) -> Standing(judd)\nforall x (Mellowed(x) and Stemless(x) -> Neighborly(x))\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Secretive(x) -> Standing(x))\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Neighborly(x) -> Khaki(x))\n\nNonchalant(travis)\n\nNonchalant(travis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "The frieda is spinose. The frieda felicitate the laney. The elsa barbecue the laney. The elsa is mired. The elsa is killable. The elsa constrict the karlene. The laney is mired. The laney constrict the frieda. The karlene felicitate the frieda. The karlene felicitate the laney. If the laney felicitate the frieda and the laney barbecue the karlene then the laney constrict the frieda. If something is mired then it barbecue the laney. If something barbecue the laney then it felicitate the frieda. The elsa is mired.", "logic": "\nSpinose(frieda)\nFelicitate(frieda, laney)\nBarbecue(elsa, laney)\nMired(elsa)\nKillable(elsa)\nConstrict(elsa, karlene)\nMired(laney)\nConstrict(laney, frieda)\nFelicitate(karlene, frieda)\nFelicitate(karlene, laney)\nFelicitate(laney, frieda) and Barbecue(laney, karlene) -> Constrict(laney, frieda)\nforall x (Mired(x) -> Barbecue(x, laney))\nforall x (Barbecue(x, laney) -> Felicitate(x, frieda))\n\nMired(elsa)\n\ntherefore Mired(elsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The oreste is chylaceous. The oreste fustigate the blondell. The anthe dispense the blondell. The anthe is essential. The anthe is bathyal. The anthe metricise the benjy. The blondell is essential. The blondell metricise the oreste. The benjy fustigate the oreste. The benjy fustigate the blondell. If the blondell fustigate the oreste and the blondell dispense the benjy then the blondell metricise the oreste. If something is essential then it dispense the blondell. If something dispense the blondell then it fustigate the oreste. The anthe does not eat the blondell.", "logic": "\nChylaceous(oreste)\nFustigate(oreste, blondell)\nDispense(anthe, blondell)\nEssential(anthe)\nBathyal(anthe)\nMetricise(anthe, benjy)\nEssential(blondell)\nMetricise(blondell, oreste)\nFustigate(benjy, oreste)\nFustigate(benjy, blondell)\nFustigate(blondell, oreste) and Dispense(blondell, benjy) -> Metricise(blondell, oreste)\nforall x (Essential(x) -> Dispense(x, blondell))\nforall x (Dispense(x, blondell) -> Fustigate(x, oreste))\n\nnot Dispense(anthe, blondell)\n\ntherefore Dispense(anthe, blondell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The mandie is uninspired. The mandie subrogate the christof. The ansell survive the christof. The ansell is tenderised. The ansell is butch. The ansell establish the cathrin. The christof is tenderised. The christof establish the mandie. The cathrin subrogate the mandie. The cathrin subrogate the christof. If the christof subrogate the mandie and the christof survive the cathrin then the christof establish the mandie. If something is tenderised then it survive the christof. If something survive the christof then it subrogate the mandie. The christof survive the christof.", "logic": "\nUninspired(mandie)\nSubrogate(mandie, christof)\nSurvive(ansell, christof)\nTenderised(ansell)\nButch(ansell)\nEstablish(ansell, cathrin)\nTenderised(christof)\nEstablish(christof, mandie)\nSubrogate(cathrin, mandie)\nSubrogate(cathrin, christof)\nSubrogate(christof, mandie) and Survive(christof, cathrin) -> Establish(christof, mandie)\nforall x (Tenderised(x) -> Survive(x, christof))\nforall x (Survive(x, christof) -> Subrogate(x, mandie))\n\nSurvive(christof, christof)\n\nTenderised(christof) and forall x (Tenderised(x) -> Survive(x, christof)) -> therefore Survive(christof, christof)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The livia is divine. The livia blood the winton. The julie goggle the winton. The julie is saporous. The julie is dictated. The julie wonder the emmett. The winton is saporous. The winton wonder the livia. The emmett blood the livia. The emmett blood the winton. If the winton blood the livia and the winton goggle the emmett then the winton wonder the livia. If something is saporous then it goggle the winton. If something goggle the winton then it blood the livia. The winton does not eat the winton.", "logic": "\nDivine(livia)\nBlood(livia, winton)\nGoggle(julie, winton)\nSaporous(julie)\nDictated(julie)\nWonder(julie, emmett)\nSaporous(winton)\nWonder(winton, livia)\nBlood(emmett, livia)\nBlood(emmett, winton)\nBlood(winton, livia) and Goggle(winton, emmett) -> Wonder(winton, livia)\nforall x (Saporous(x) -> Goggle(x, winton))\nforall x (Goggle(x, winton) -> Blood(x, livia))\n\nnot Goggle(winton, winton)\n\nSaporous(winton) and forall x (Saporous(x) -> Goggle(x, winton)) -> therefore Goggle(winton, winton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The sal is myelinic. The sal resonate the evangelia. The lira scalp the evangelia. The lira is chasidic. The lira is sincere. The lira infer the carleen. The evangelia is chasidic. The evangelia infer the sal. The carleen resonate the sal. The carleen resonate the evangelia. If the evangelia resonate the sal and the evangelia scalp the carleen then the evangelia infer the sal. If something is chasidic then it scalp the evangelia. If something scalp the evangelia then it resonate the sal. The evangelia resonate the sal.", "logic": "\nMyelinic(sal)\nResonate(sal, evangelia)\nScalp(lira, evangelia)\nChasidic(lira)\nSincere(lira)\nInfer(lira, carleen)\nChasidic(evangelia)\nInfer(evangelia, sal)\nResonate(carleen, sal)\nResonate(carleen, evangelia)\nResonate(evangelia, sal) and Scalp(evangelia, carleen) -> Infer(evangelia, sal)\nforall x (Chasidic(x) -> Scalp(x, evangelia))\nforall x (Scalp(x, evangelia) -> Resonate(x, sal))\n\nResonate(evangelia, sal)\n\nChasidic(evangelia) and forall x (Chasidic(x) -> Scalp(x, evangelia)) -> therefore Scalp(evangelia, evangelia) Scalp(evangelia, evangelia) and forall x (Scalp(x, evangelia) -> Resonate(x, sal)) -> therefore Resonate(evangelia, sal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The dean is homologic. The dean journey the harmony. The elfreda misplay the harmony. The elfreda is expendable. The elfreda is arch. The elfreda suffice the susi. The harmony is expendable. The harmony suffice the dean. The susi journey the dean. The susi journey the harmony. If the harmony journey the dean and the harmony misplay the susi then the harmony suffice the dean. If something is expendable then it misplay the harmony. If something misplay the harmony then it journey the dean. The harmony does not need the dean.", "logic": "\nHomologic(dean)\nJourney(dean, harmony)\nMisplay(elfreda, harmony)\nExpendable(elfreda)\nArch(elfreda)\nSuffice(elfreda, susi)\nExpendable(harmony)\nSuffice(harmony, dean)\nJourney(susi, dean)\nJourney(susi, harmony)\nJourney(harmony, dean) and Misplay(harmony, susi) -> Suffice(harmony, dean)\nforall x (Expendable(x) -> Misplay(x, harmony))\nforall x (Misplay(x, harmony) -> Journey(x, dean))\n\nnot Journey(harmony, dean)\n\nExpendable(harmony) and forall x (Expendable(x) -> Misplay(x, harmony)) -> therefore Misplay(harmony, harmony) Misplay(harmony, harmony) and forall x (Misplay(x, harmony) -> Journey(x, dean)) -> therefore Journey(harmony, dean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The alli is multiphase. The alli sugar the tawsha. The kevin debase the tawsha. The kevin is undulatory. The kevin is yokelish. The kevin darken the johnathon. The tawsha is undulatory. The tawsha darken the alli. The johnathon sugar the alli. The johnathon sugar the tawsha. If the tawsha sugar the alli and the tawsha debase the johnathon then the tawsha darken the alli. If something is undulatory then it debase the tawsha. If something debase the tawsha then it sugar the alli. The alli does not eat the tawsha.", "logic": "\nMultiphase(alli)\nSugar(alli, tawsha)\nDebase(kevin, tawsha)\nUndulatory(kevin)\nYokelish(kevin)\nDarken(kevin, johnathon)\nUndulatory(tawsha)\nDarken(tawsha, alli)\nSugar(johnathon, alli)\nSugar(johnathon, tawsha)\nSugar(tawsha, alli) and Debase(tawsha, johnathon) -> Darken(tawsha, alli)\nforall x (Undulatory(x) -> Debase(x, tawsha))\nforall x (Debase(x, tawsha) -> Sugar(x, alli))\n\nnot Debase(alli, tawsha)\n\nforall x (Undulatory(x) -> Debase(x, tawsha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The jarrett is brassbound. The jarrett altercate the casper. The april repatriate the casper. The april is nonunion. The april is laggard. The april coil the angy. The casper is nonunion. The casper coil the jarrett. The angy altercate the jarrett. The angy altercate the casper. If the casper altercate the jarrett and the casper repatriate the angy then the casper coil the jarrett. If something is nonunion then it repatriate the casper. If something repatriate the casper then it altercate the jarrett. The angy repatriate the casper.", "logic": "\nBrassbound(jarrett)\nAltercate(jarrett, casper)\nRepatriate(april, casper)\nNonunion(april)\nLaggard(april)\nCoil(april, angy)\nNonunion(casper)\nCoil(casper, jarrett)\nAltercate(angy, jarrett)\nAltercate(angy, casper)\nAltercate(casper, jarrett) and Repatriate(casper, angy) -> Coil(casper, jarrett)\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> Repatriate(x, casper))\nforall x (Repatriate(x, casper) -> Altercate(x, jarrett))\n\nRepatriate(angy, casper)\n\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> Repatriate(x, casper)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The wilhelm is booked. The wilhelm drill the mace. The madonna resplend the mace. The madonna is detonative. The madonna is feasible. The madonna cajole the risa. The mace is detonative. The mace cajole the wilhelm. The risa drill the wilhelm. The risa drill the mace. If the mace drill the wilhelm and the mace resplend the risa then the mace cajole the wilhelm. If something is detonative then it resplend the mace. If something resplend the mace then it drill the wilhelm. The wilhelm does not need the wilhelm.", "logic": "\nBooked(wilhelm)\nDrill(wilhelm, mace)\nResplend(madonna, mace)\nDetonative(madonna)\nFeasible(madonna)\nCajole(madonna, risa)\nDetonative(mace)\nCajole(mace, wilhelm)\nDrill(risa, wilhelm)\nDrill(risa, mace)\nDrill(mace, wilhelm) and Resplend(mace, risa) -> Cajole(mace, wilhelm)\nforall x (Detonative(x) -> Resplend(x, mace))\nforall x (Resplend(x, mace) -> Drill(x, wilhelm))\n\nnot Drill(wilhelm, wilhelm)\n\nforall x (Resplend(x, mace) -> Drill(x, wilhelm)) <- forall x (Detonative(x) -> Resplend(x, mace)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The diahann is sibylline. The diahann privatise the ragnhild. The orazio mildew the ragnhild. The orazio is pumped. The orazio is corinthian. The orazio well the shelagh. The ragnhild is pumped. The ragnhild well the diahann. The shelagh privatise the diahann. The shelagh privatise the ragnhild. If the ragnhild privatise the diahann and the ragnhild mildew the shelagh then the ragnhild well the diahann. If something is pumped then it mildew the ragnhild. If something mildew the ragnhild then it privatise the diahann. The diahann is pumped.", "logic": "\nSibylline(diahann)\nPrivatise(diahann, ragnhild)\nMildew(orazio, ragnhild)\nPumped(orazio)\nCorinthian(orazio)\nWell(orazio, shelagh)\nPumped(ragnhild)\nWell(ragnhild, diahann)\nPrivatise(shelagh, diahann)\nPrivatise(shelagh, ragnhild)\nPrivatise(ragnhild, diahann) and Mildew(ragnhild, shelagh) -> Well(ragnhild, diahann)\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> Mildew(x, ragnhild))\nforall x (Mildew(x, ragnhild) -> Privatise(x, diahann))\n\nPumped(diahann)\n\nPumped(diahann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The jerrold is spellbound. The jerrold zipper the georgina. The britte lighten the georgina. The britte is uremic. The britte is microbial. The britte instill the adina. The georgina is uremic. The georgina instill the jerrold. The adina zipper the jerrold. The adina zipper the georgina. If the georgina zipper the jerrold and the georgina lighten the adina then the georgina instill the jerrold. If something is uremic then it lighten the georgina. If something lighten the georgina then it zipper the jerrold. The georgina is not spellbound.", "logic": "\nSpellbound(jerrold)\nZipper(jerrold, georgina)\nLighten(britte, georgina)\nUremic(britte)\nMicrobial(britte)\nInstill(britte, adina)\nUremic(georgina)\nInstill(georgina, jerrold)\nZipper(adina, jerrold)\nZipper(adina, georgina)\nZipper(georgina, jerrold) and Lighten(georgina, adina) -> Instill(georgina, jerrold)\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Lighten(x, georgina))\nforall x (Lighten(x, georgina) -> Zipper(x, jerrold))\n\nnot Spellbound(georgina)\n\nnot Spellbound(georgina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The natalee is clunky. The natalee incinerate the ciel. The suzanna sideline the ciel. The suzanna is deserving. The suzanna is heroic. The suzanna cybernate the cicely. The ciel is deserving. The ciel cybernate the natalee. The cicely incinerate the natalee. The cicely incinerate the ciel. If the ciel incinerate the natalee and the ciel sideline the cicely then the ciel cybernate the natalee. If something is deserving then it sideline the ciel. If something sideline the ciel then it incinerate the natalee. The cicely is young.", "logic": "\nClunky(natalee)\nIncinerate(natalee, ciel)\nSideline(suzanna, ciel)\nDeserving(suzanna)\nHeroic(suzanna)\nCybernate(suzanna, cicely)\nDeserving(ciel)\nCybernate(ciel, natalee)\nIncinerate(cicely, natalee)\nIncinerate(cicely, ciel)\nIncinerate(ciel, natalee) and Sideline(ciel, cicely) -> Cybernate(ciel, natalee)\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Sideline(x, ciel))\nforall x (Sideline(x, ciel) -> Incinerate(x, natalee))\n\nYoung(cicely)\n\nYoung(cicely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-939"} {"premises": "The sylvia unhitch the charisse. The sylvia is faltering. The sylvia is credible. The sylvia revoke the charisse. The charisse unhitch the sylvia. The charisse decimalize the sylvia. The charisse is credible. If the charisse unhitch the sylvia and the charisse revoke the sylvia then the charisse is faltering. If someone decimalize the charisse and they need the charisse then the charisse is colossal. If the sylvia is snowy and the sylvia revoke the charisse then the sylvia is colonized. If the charisse decimalize the sylvia then the sylvia decimalize the charisse. If someone revoke the sylvia and the sylvia revoke the charisse then the sylvia is colossal. If the sylvia is colonized then the sylvia unhitch the charisse. If the sylvia revoke the charisse then the charisse revoke the sylvia. If someone revoke the charisse then they are faltering. The charisse is credible.", "logic": "\nUnhitch(sylvia, charisse)\nFaltering(sylvia)\nCredible(sylvia)\nRevoke(sylvia, charisse)\nUnhitch(charisse, sylvia)\nDecimalize(charisse, sylvia)\nCredible(charisse)\nUnhitch(charisse, sylvia) and Revoke(charisse, sylvia) -> Faltering(charisse)\nforall x (Decimalize(x, charisse) and Revoke(x, charisse) -> Colossal(charisse))\nSnowy(sylvia) and Revoke(sylvia, charisse) -> Colonized(sylvia)\nDecimalize(charisse, sylvia) -> Decimalize(sylvia, charisse)\nforall x (Revoke(x, sylvia) and Revoke(sylvia, charisse) -> Colossal(sylvia))\nColonized(sylvia) -> Unhitch(sylvia, charisse)\nRevoke(sylvia, charisse) -> Revoke(charisse, sylvia)\nforall x (Revoke(x, charisse) -> Faltering(x))\n\nCredible(charisse)\n\ntherefore Credible(charisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The mareah foxhunt the cleveland. The mareah is deliberate. The mareah is european. The mareah enrich the cleveland. The cleveland foxhunt the mareah. The cleveland diabolise the mareah. The cleveland is european. If the cleveland foxhunt the mareah and the cleveland enrich the mareah then the cleveland is deliberate. If someone diabolise the cleveland and they need the cleveland then the cleveland is azido. If the mareah is piscine and the mareah enrich the cleveland then the mareah is hormonal. If the cleveland diabolise the mareah then the mareah diabolise the cleveland. If someone enrich the mareah and the mareah enrich the cleveland then the mareah is azido. If the mareah is hormonal then the mareah foxhunt the cleveland. If the mareah enrich the cleveland then the cleveland enrich the mareah. If someone enrich the cleveland then they are deliberate. The cleveland does not chase the mareah.", "logic": "\nFoxhunt(mareah, cleveland)\nDeliberate(mareah)\nEuropean(mareah)\nEnrich(mareah, cleveland)\nFoxhunt(cleveland, mareah)\nDiabolise(cleveland, mareah)\nEuropean(cleveland)\nFoxhunt(cleveland, mareah) and Enrich(cleveland, mareah) -> Deliberate(cleveland)\nforall x (Diabolise(x, cleveland) and Enrich(x, cleveland) -> Azido(cleveland))\nPiscine(mareah) and Enrich(mareah, cleveland) -> Hormonal(mareah)\nDiabolise(cleveland, mareah) -> Diabolise(mareah, cleveland)\nforall x (Enrich(x, mareah) and Enrich(mareah, cleveland) -> Azido(mareah))\nHormonal(mareah) -> Foxhunt(mareah, cleveland)\nEnrich(mareah, cleveland) -> Enrich(cleveland, mareah)\nforall x (Enrich(x, cleveland) -> Deliberate(x))\n\nnot Foxhunt(cleveland, mareah)\n\ntherefore Foxhunt(cleveland, mareah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The sylvester encode the teresina. The sylvester is genuine. The sylvester is flowery. The sylvester tapdance the teresina. The teresina encode the sylvester. The teresina cluck the sylvester. The teresina is flowery. If the teresina encode the sylvester and the teresina tapdance the sylvester then the teresina is genuine. If someone cluck the teresina and they need the teresina then the teresina is jocose. If the sylvester is tiresome and the sylvester tapdance the teresina then the sylvester is ornamental. If the teresina cluck the sylvester then the sylvester cluck the teresina. If someone tapdance the sylvester and the sylvester tapdance the teresina then the sylvester is jocose. If the sylvester is ornamental then the sylvester encode the teresina. If the sylvester tapdance the teresina then the teresina tapdance the sylvester. If someone tapdance the teresina then they are genuine. The teresina tapdance the sylvester.", "logic": "\nEncode(sylvester, teresina)\nGenuine(sylvester)\nFlowery(sylvester)\nTapdance(sylvester, teresina)\nEncode(teresina, sylvester)\nCluck(teresina, sylvester)\nFlowery(teresina)\nEncode(teresina, sylvester) and Tapdance(teresina, sylvester) -> Genuine(teresina)\nforall x (Cluck(x, teresina) and Tapdance(x, teresina) -> Jocose(teresina))\nTiresome(sylvester) and Tapdance(sylvester, teresina) -> Ornamental(sylvester)\nCluck(teresina, sylvester) -> Cluck(sylvester, teresina)\nforall x (Tapdance(x, sylvester) and Tapdance(sylvester, teresina) -> Jocose(sylvester))\nOrnamental(sylvester) -> Encode(sylvester, teresina)\nTapdance(sylvester, teresina) -> Tapdance(teresina, sylvester)\nforall x (Tapdance(x, teresina) -> Genuine(x))\n\nTapdance(teresina, sylvester)\n\nTapdance(sylvester, teresina) and Tapdance(sylvester, teresina) -> Tapdance(teresina, sylvester) -> therefore Tapdance(teresina, sylvester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The leese preface the wilfrid. The leese is anoxic. The leese is elvish. The leese unclasp the wilfrid. The wilfrid preface the leese. The wilfrid reword the leese. The wilfrid is elvish. If the wilfrid preface the leese and the wilfrid unclasp the leese then the wilfrid is anoxic. If someone reword the wilfrid and they need the wilfrid then the wilfrid is distal. If the leese is stumpy and the leese unclasp the wilfrid then the leese is smashing. If the wilfrid reword the leese then the leese reword the wilfrid. If someone unclasp the leese and the leese unclasp the wilfrid then the leese is distal. If the leese is smashing then the leese preface the wilfrid. If the leese unclasp the wilfrid then the wilfrid unclasp the leese. If someone unclasp the wilfrid then they are anoxic. The leese does not eat the wilfrid.", "logic": "\nPreface(leese, wilfrid)\nAnoxic(leese)\nElvish(leese)\nUnclasp(leese, wilfrid)\nPreface(wilfrid, leese)\nReword(wilfrid, leese)\nElvish(wilfrid)\nPreface(wilfrid, leese) and Unclasp(wilfrid, leese) -> Anoxic(wilfrid)\nforall x (Reword(x, wilfrid) and Unclasp(x, wilfrid) -> Distal(wilfrid))\nStumpy(leese) and Unclasp(leese, wilfrid) -> Smashing(leese)\nReword(wilfrid, leese) -> Reword(leese, wilfrid)\nforall x (Unclasp(x, leese) and Unclasp(leese, wilfrid) -> Distal(leese))\nSmashing(leese) -> Preface(leese, wilfrid)\nUnclasp(leese, wilfrid) -> Unclasp(wilfrid, leese)\nforall x (Unclasp(x, wilfrid) -> Anoxic(x))\n\nnot Reword(leese, wilfrid)\n\nReword(wilfrid, leese) and Reword(wilfrid, leese) -> Reword(leese, wilfrid) -> therefore Reword(leese, wilfrid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The orelee fritter the sampson. The orelee is adamant. The orelee is plump. The orelee prostrate the sampson. The sampson fritter the orelee. The sampson scallop the orelee. The sampson is plump. If the sampson fritter the orelee and the sampson prostrate the orelee then the sampson is adamant. If someone scallop the sampson and they need the sampson then the sampson is hitlerian. If the orelee is bicolor and the orelee prostrate the sampson then the orelee is prophetic. If the sampson scallop the orelee then the orelee scallop the sampson. If someone prostrate the orelee and the orelee prostrate the sampson then the orelee is hitlerian. If the orelee is prophetic then the orelee fritter the sampson. If the orelee prostrate the sampson then the sampson prostrate the orelee. If someone prostrate the sampson then they are adamant. The sampson is adamant.", "logic": "\nFritter(orelee, sampson)\nAdamant(orelee)\nPlump(orelee)\nProstrate(orelee, sampson)\nFritter(sampson, orelee)\nScallop(sampson, orelee)\nPlump(sampson)\nFritter(sampson, orelee) and Prostrate(sampson, orelee) -> Adamant(sampson)\nforall x (Scallop(x, sampson) and Prostrate(x, sampson) -> Hitlerian(sampson))\nBicolor(orelee) and Prostrate(orelee, sampson) -> Prophetic(orelee)\nScallop(sampson, orelee) -> Scallop(orelee, sampson)\nforall x (Prostrate(x, orelee) and Prostrate(orelee, sampson) -> Hitlerian(orelee))\nProphetic(orelee) -> Fritter(orelee, sampson)\nProstrate(orelee, sampson) -> Prostrate(sampson, orelee)\nforall x (Prostrate(x, sampson) -> Adamant(x))\n\nAdamant(sampson)\n\nProstrate(orelee, sampson) and Prostrate(orelee, sampson) -> Prostrate(sampson, orelee) -> therefore Prostrate(sampson, orelee) Fritter(sampson, orelee) and Prostrate(sampson, orelee) and Fritter(sampson, orelee) and Prostrate(sampson, orelee) -> Adamant(sampson) -> therefore Adamant(sampson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The arlina augur the jessamine. The arlina is tympanitic. The arlina is unblended. The arlina reanimate the jessamine. The jessamine augur the arlina. The jessamine namedrop the arlina. The jessamine is unblended. If the jessamine augur the arlina and the jessamine reanimate the arlina then the jessamine is tympanitic. If someone namedrop the jessamine and they need the jessamine then the jessamine is bias. If the arlina is twelfth and the arlina reanimate the jessamine then the arlina is concise. If the jessamine namedrop the arlina then the arlina namedrop the jessamine. If someone reanimate the arlina and the arlina reanimate the jessamine then the arlina is bias. If the arlina is concise then the arlina augur the jessamine. If the arlina reanimate the jessamine then the jessamine reanimate the arlina. If someone reanimate the jessamine then they are tympanitic. The jessamine is not bias.", "logic": "\nAugur(arlina, jessamine)\nTympanitic(arlina)\nUnblended(arlina)\nReanimate(arlina, jessamine)\nAugur(jessamine, arlina)\nNamedrop(jessamine, arlina)\nUnblended(jessamine)\nAugur(jessamine, arlina) and Reanimate(jessamine, arlina) -> Tympanitic(jessamine)\nforall x (Namedrop(x, jessamine) and Reanimate(x, jessamine) -> Bias(jessamine))\nTwelfth(arlina) and Reanimate(arlina, jessamine) -> Concise(arlina)\nNamedrop(jessamine, arlina) -> Namedrop(arlina, jessamine)\nforall x (Reanimate(x, arlina) and Reanimate(arlina, jessamine) -> Bias(arlina))\nConcise(arlina) -> Augur(arlina, jessamine)\nReanimate(arlina, jessamine) -> Reanimate(jessamine, arlina)\nforall x (Reanimate(x, jessamine) -> Tympanitic(x))\n\nnot Bias(jessamine)\n\nNamedrop(jessamine, arlina) and Namedrop(jessamine, arlina) -> Namedrop(arlina, jessamine) -> therefore Namedrop(arlina, jessamine) Namedrop(arlina, jessamine) and Reanimate(arlina, jessamine) and forall x (Namedrop(x, jessamine) and Reanimate(x, jessamine) -> Bias(jessamine)) -> therefore Bias(jessamine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The marge pity the emanuel. The marge is bluff. The marge is fagged. The marge fusillade the emanuel. The emanuel pity the marge. The emanuel ball the marge. The emanuel is fagged. If the emanuel pity the marge and the emanuel fusillade the marge then the emanuel is bluff. If someone ball the emanuel and they need the emanuel then the emanuel is lasting. If the marge is adherent and the marge fusillade the emanuel then the marge is coiled. If the emanuel ball the marge then the marge ball the emanuel. If someone fusillade the marge and the marge fusillade the emanuel then the marge is lasting. If the marge is coiled then the marge pity the emanuel. If the marge fusillade the emanuel then the emanuel fusillade the marge. If someone fusillade the emanuel then they are bluff. The marge is not coiled.", "logic": "\nPity(marge, emanuel)\nBluff(marge)\nFagged(marge)\nFusillade(marge, emanuel)\nPity(emanuel, marge)\nBall(emanuel, marge)\nFagged(emanuel)\nPity(emanuel, marge) and Fusillade(emanuel, marge) -> Bluff(emanuel)\nforall x (Ball(x, emanuel) and Fusillade(x, emanuel) -> Lasting(emanuel))\nAdherent(marge) and Fusillade(marge, emanuel) -> Coiled(marge)\nBall(emanuel, marge) -> Ball(marge, emanuel)\nforall x (Fusillade(x, marge) and Fusillade(marge, emanuel) -> Lasting(marge))\nCoiled(marge) -> Pity(marge, emanuel)\nFusillade(marge, emanuel) -> Fusillade(emanuel, marge)\nforall x (Fusillade(x, emanuel) -> Bluff(x))\n\nnot Coiled(marge)\n\nAdherent(marge) and Fusillade(marge, emanuel) -> Coiled(marge) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The dwane bong the viva. The dwane is ringlike. The dwane is shoaly. The dwane medicine the viva. The viva bong the dwane. The viva cabin the dwane. The viva is shoaly. If the viva bong the dwane and the viva medicine the dwane then the viva is ringlike. If someone cabin the viva and they need the viva then the viva is each. If the dwane is busybodied and the dwane medicine the viva then the dwane is giddy. If the viva cabin the dwane then the dwane cabin the viva. If someone medicine the dwane and the dwane medicine the viva then the dwane is each. If the dwane is giddy then the dwane bong the viva. If the dwane medicine the viva then the viva medicine the dwane. If someone medicine the viva then they are ringlike. The viva is giddy.", "logic": "\nBong(dwane, viva)\nRinglike(dwane)\nShoaly(dwane)\nMedicine(dwane, viva)\nBong(viva, dwane)\nCabin(viva, dwane)\nShoaly(viva)\nBong(viva, dwane) and Medicine(viva, dwane) -> Ringlike(viva)\nforall x (Cabin(x, viva) and Medicine(x, viva) -> Each(viva))\nBusybodied(dwane) and Medicine(dwane, viva) -> Giddy(dwane)\nCabin(viva, dwane) -> Cabin(dwane, viva)\nforall x (Medicine(x, dwane) and Medicine(dwane, viva) -> Each(dwane))\nGiddy(dwane) -> Bong(dwane, viva)\nMedicine(dwane, viva) -> Medicine(viva, dwane)\nforall x (Medicine(x, viva) -> Ringlike(x))\n\nGiddy(viva)\n\nGiddy(viva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The gerome coquette the winfred. The gerome is colorful. The gerome is complex. The gerome enforce the winfred. The winfred coquette the gerome. The winfred smock the gerome. The winfred is complex. If the winfred coquette the gerome and the winfred enforce the gerome then the winfred is colorful. If someone smock the winfred and they need the winfred then the winfred is apodal. If the gerome is bungled and the gerome enforce the winfred then the gerome is towering. If the winfred smock the gerome then the gerome smock the winfred. If someone enforce the gerome and the gerome enforce the winfred then the gerome is apodal. If the gerome is towering then the gerome coquette the winfred. If the gerome enforce the winfred then the winfred enforce the gerome. If someone enforce the winfred then they are colorful. The winfred does not eat the winfred.", "logic": "\nCoquette(gerome, winfred)\nColorful(gerome)\nComplex(gerome)\nEnforce(gerome, winfred)\nCoquette(winfred, gerome)\nSmock(winfred, gerome)\nComplex(winfred)\nCoquette(winfred, gerome) and Enforce(winfred, gerome) -> Colorful(winfred)\nforall x (Smock(x, winfred) and Enforce(x, winfred) -> Apodal(winfred))\nBungled(gerome) and Enforce(gerome, winfred) -> Towering(gerome)\nSmock(winfred, gerome) -> Smock(gerome, winfred)\nforall x (Enforce(x, gerome) and Enforce(gerome, winfred) -> Apodal(gerome))\nTowering(gerome) -> Coquette(gerome, winfred)\nEnforce(gerome, winfred) -> Enforce(winfred, gerome)\nforall x (Enforce(x, winfred) -> Colorful(x))\n\nnot Smock(winfred, winfred)\n\nnot Smock(winfred, winfred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The bridgett camphorate the spence. The bridgett is welfarist. The bridgett is anile. The bridgett etherify the spence. The spence camphorate the bridgett. The spence housekeep the bridgett. The spence is anile. If the spence camphorate the bridgett and the spence etherify the bridgett then the spence is welfarist. If someone housekeep the spence and they need the spence then the spence is ungual. If the bridgett is reclaimed and the bridgett etherify the spence then the bridgett is regimented. If the spence housekeep the bridgett then the bridgett housekeep the spence. If someone etherify the bridgett and the bridgett etherify the spence then the bridgett is ungual. If the bridgett is regimented then the bridgett camphorate the spence. If the bridgett etherify the spence then the spence etherify the bridgett. If someone etherify the spence then they are welfarist. The spence camphorate the spence.", "logic": "\nCamphorate(bridgett, spence)\nWelfarist(bridgett)\nAnile(bridgett)\nEtherify(bridgett, spence)\nCamphorate(spence, bridgett)\nHousekeep(spence, bridgett)\nAnile(spence)\nCamphorate(spence, bridgett) and Etherify(spence, bridgett) -> Welfarist(spence)\nforall x (Housekeep(x, spence) and Etherify(x, spence) -> Ungual(spence))\nReclaimed(bridgett) and Etherify(bridgett, spence) -> Regimented(bridgett)\nHousekeep(spence, bridgett) -> Housekeep(bridgett, spence)\nforall x (Etherify(x, bridgett) and Etherify(bridgett, spence) -> Ungual(bridgett))\nRegimented(bridgett) -> Camphorate(bridgett, spence)\nEtherify(bridgett, spence) -> Etherify(spence, bridgett)\nforall x (Etherify(x, spence) -> Welfarist(x))\n\nCamphorate(spence, spence)\n\nCamphorate(spence, spence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The morris galumph the gwenora. The morris is zygodactyl. The morris is cottony. The morris speed the gwenora. The gwenora galumph the morris. The gwenora psalm the morris. The gwenora is cottony. If the gwenora galumph the morris and the gwenora speed the morris then the gwenora is zygodactyl. If someone psalm the gwenora and they need the gwenora then the gwenora is ariled. If the morris is drudging and the morris speed the gwenora then the morris is foliaged. If the gwenora psalm the morris then the morris psalm the gwenora. If someone speed the morris and the morris speed the gwenora then the morris is ariled. If the morris is foliaged then the morris galumph the gwenora. If the morris speed the gwenora then the gwenora speed the morris. If someone speed the gwenora then they are zygodactyl. The morris is not drudging.", "logic": "\nGalumph(morris, gwenora)\nZygodactyl(morris)\nCottony(morris)\nSpeed(morris, gwenora)\nGalumph(gwenora, morris)\nPsalm(gwenora, morris)\nCottony(gwenora)\nGalumph(gwenora, morris) and Speed(gwenora, morris) -> Zygodactyl(gwenora)\nforall x (Psalm(x, gwenora) and Speed(x, gwenora) -> Ariled(gwenora))\nDrudging(morris) and Speed(morris, gwenora) -> Foliaged(morris)\nPsalm(gwenora, morris) -> Psalm(morris, gwenora)\nforall x (Speed(x, morris) and Speed(morris, gwenora) -> Ariled(morris))\nFoliaged(morris) -> Galumph(morris, gwenora)\nSpeed(morris, gwenora) -> Speed(gwenora, morris)\nforall x (Speed(x, gwenora) -> Zygodactyl(x))\n\nnot Drudging(morris)\n\nnot Drudging(morris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "The hobart prate the ken. The hobart is incursive. The hobart is eleven. The hobart unwind the ken. The ken prate the hobart. The ken fertilize the hobart. The ken is eleven. If the ken prate the hobart and the ken unwind the hobart then the ken is incursive. If someone fertilize the ken and they need the ken then the ken is metrical. If the hobart is trig and the hobart unwind the ken then the hobart is makeshift. If the ken fertilize the hobart then the hobart fertilize the ken. If someone unwind the hobart and the hobart unwind the ken then the hobart is metrical. If the hobart is makeshift then the hobart prate the ken. If the hobart unwind the ken then the ken unwind the hobart. If someone unwind the ken then they are incursive. The ken is trig.", "logic": "\nPrate(hobart, ken)\nIncursive(hobart)\nEleven(hobart)\nUnwind(hobart, ken)\nPrate(ken, hobart)\nFertilize(ken, hobart)\nEleven(ken)\nPrate(ken, hobart) and Unwind(ken, hobart) -> Incursive(ken)\nforall x (Fertilize(x, ken) and Unwind(x, ken) -> Metrical(ken))\nTrig(hobart) and Unwind(hobart, ken) -> Makeshift(hobart)\nFertilize(ken, hobart) -> Fertilize(hobart, ken)\nforall x (Unwind(x, hobart) and Unwind(hobart, ken) -> Metrical(hobart))\nMakeshift(hobart) -> Prate(hobart, ken)\nUnwind(hobart, ken) -> Unwind(ken, hobart)\nforall x (Unwind(x, ken) -> Incursive(x))\n\nTrig(ken)\n\nTrig(ken) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1736"} {"premises": "Skelly is semilunar. All lusty people are delighted. All diffusive, atheist people are tiptoe. All bosomed people are atheist. All lusty, atheist people are tiptoe. All semilunar people are bosomed. If someone is diffusive then they are bosomed. Skelly is semilunar.", "logic": "\nSemilunar(skelly)\nforall x (Lusty(x) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) and Atheist(x) -> Tiptoe(x))\nforall x (Bosomed(x) -> Atheist(x))\nforall x (Lusty(x) and Atheist(x) -> Tiptoe(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) -> Bosomed(x))\n\nSemilunar(skelly)\n\ntherefore Semilunar(skelly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Caesar is bisontine. All carpellate people are favorite. All fanatical, submerged people are necked. All inheriting people are submerged. All carpellate, submerged people are necked. All bisontine people are inheriting. If someone is fanatical then they are inheriting. Caesar is not bisontine.", "logic": "\nBisontine(caesar)\nforall x (Carpellate(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Fanatical(x) and Submerged(x) -> Necked(x))\nforall x (Inheriting(x) -> Submerged(x))\nforall x (Carpellate(x) and Submerged(x) -> Necked(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Inheriting(x))\nforall x (Fanatical(x) -> Inheriting(x))\n\nnot Bisontine(caesar)\n\ntherefore Bisontine(caesar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Dorthy is wigged. All rangy people are pragmatic. All bushy, unbelted people are ohmic. All anaglyptic people are unbelted. All rangy, unbelted people are ohmic. All wigged people are anaglyptic. If someone is bushy then they are anaglyptic. Dorthy is anaglyptic.", "logic": "\nWigged(dorthy)\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> Pragmatic(x))\nforall x (Bushy(x) and Unbelted(x) -> Ohmic(x))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Unbelted(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) and Unbelted(x) -> Ohmic(x))\nforall x (Wigged(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nforall x (Bushy(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\n\nAnaglyptic(dorthy)\n\nWigged(dorthy) and forall x (Wigged(x) -> Anaglyptic(x)) -> therefore Anaglyptic(dorthy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Ludwig is agraphic. All teeny people are majuscule. All cypriote, ninth people are unsoiled. All stocked people are ninth. All teeny, ninth people are unsoiled. All agraphic people are stocked. If someone is cypriote then they are stocked. Ludwig is not stocked.", "logic": "\nAgraphic(ludwig)\nforall x (Teeny(x) -> Majuscule(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) and Ninth(x) -> Unsoiled(x))\nforall x (Stocked(x) -> Ninth(x))\nforall x (Teeny(x) and Ninth(x) -> Unsoiled(x))\nforall x (Agraphic(x) -> Stocked(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) -> Stocked(x))\n\nnot Stocked(ludwig)\n\nAgraphic(ludwig) and forall x (Agraphic(x) -> Stocked(x)) -> therefore Stocked(ludwig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Kris is cocksure. All contained people are mesolithic. All bisexual, arterial people are brownish. All slipshod people are arterial. All contained, arterial people are brownish. All cocksure people are slipshod. If someone is bisexual then they are slipshod. Kris is arterial.", "logic": "\nCocksure(kris)\nforall x (Contained(x) -> Mesolithic(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) and Arterial(x) -> Brownish(x))\nforall x (Slipshod(x) -> Arterial(x))\nforall x (Contained(x) and Arterial(x) -> Brownish(x))\nforall x (Cocksure(x) -> Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) -> Slipshod(x))\n\nArterial(kris)\n\nCocksure(kris) and forall x (Cocksure(x) -> Slipshod(x)) -> therefore Slipshod(kris) Slipshod(kris) and forall x (Slipshod(x) -> Arterial(x)) -> therefore Arterial(kris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Fons is pentatonic. All unbiased people are fungous. All wound, neuralgic people are stainless. All partible people are neuralgic. All unbiased, neuralgic people are stainless. All pentatonic people are partible. If someone is wound then they are partible. Fons is not neuralgic.", "logic": "\nPentatonic(fons)\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Fungous(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) and Neuralgic(x) -> Stainless(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) -> Neuralgic(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Neuralgic(x) -> Stainless(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Partible(x))\n\nnot Neuralgic(fons)\n\nPentatonic(fons) and forall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Partible(x)) -> therefore Partible(fons) Partible(fons) and forall x (Partible(x) -> Neuralgic(x)) -> therefore Neuralgic(fons)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Fabio is dubitable. All monotonous people are dogmatic. All unsanitary, cervine people are bicoloured. All sanguinary people are cervine. All monotonous, cervine people are bicoloured. All dubitable people are sanguinary. If someone is unsanitary then they are sanguinary. Fabio is not dogmatic.", "logic": "\nDubitable(fabio)\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> Dogmatic(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) and Cervine(x) -> Bicoloured(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> Cervine(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) and Cervine(x) -> Bicoloured(x))\nforall x (Dubitable(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\n\nnot Dogmatic(fabio)\n\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> Dogmatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Cybelle is granulated. All catatonic people are unloaded. All mozartian, eligible people are ungracious. All emollient people are eligible. All catatonic, eligible people are ungracious. All granulated people are emollient. If someone is mozartian then they are emollient. Cybelle is ungracious.", "logic": "\nGranulated(cybelle)\nforall x (Catatonic(x) -> Unloaded(x))\nforall x (Mozartian(x) and Eligible(x) -> Ungracious(x))\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> Eligible(x))\nforall x (Catatonic(x) and Eligible(x) -> Ungracious(x))\nforall x (Granulated(x) -> Emollient(x))\nforall x (Mozartian(x) -> Emollient(x))\n\nUngracious(cybelle)\n\nforall x (Mozartian(x) and Eligible(x) -> Ungracious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Erinna is alight. All shellproof people are algolagnic. All grave, trepid people are atomistic. All rentable people are trepid. All shellproof, trepid people are atomistic. All alight people are rentable. If someone is grave then they are rentable. Erinna is not grave.", "logic": "\nAlight(erinna)\nforall x (Shellproof(x) -> Algolagnic(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) and Trepid(x) -> Atomistic(x))\nforall x (Rentable(x) -> Trepid(x))\nforall x (Shellproof(x) and Trepid(x) -> Atomistic(x))\nforall x (Alight(x) -> Rentable(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Rentable(x))\n\nnot Grave(erinna)\n\nnot Grave(erinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "Valma is hunched. All mettlesome people are monopteral. All bastard, feverous people are malformed. All resistless people are feverous. All mettlesome, feverous people are malformed. All hunched people are resistless. If someone is bastard then they are resistless. Valma is mettlesome.", "logic": "\nHunched(valma)\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) -> Monopteral(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) and Feverous(x) -> Malformed(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> Feverous(x))\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) and Feverous(x) -> Malformed(x))\nforall x (Hunched(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) -> Resistless(x))\n\nMettlesome(valma)\n\nMettlesome(valma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1111"} {"premises": "The izak is unnoted. The izak sleepwalk the maryrose. The izak preform the allina. The izak preform the maryrose. The allina salute the izak. The allina is unnoted. The allina is molded. The allina does not visit the carissa. The carissa salute the izak. The carissa is contrary. The maryrose salute the allina. The maryrose salute the carissa. The maryrose is unnoted. The maryrose is not least. The maryrose preform the allina. The maryrose preform the carissa. If something is molded and least then it does not visit the izak. If something sleepwalk the maryrose then the maryrose sleepwalk the allina. If something sleepwalk the allina and the allina salute the izak then the allina preform the maryrose. The allina salute the izak.", "logic": "\nUnnoted(izak)\nSleepwalk(izak, maryrose)\nPreform(izak, allina)\nPreform(izak, maryrose)\nSalute(allina, izak)\nUnnoted(allina)\nMolded(allina)\nnot Preform(allina, carissa)\nSalute(carissa, izak)\nContrary(carissa)\nSalute(maryrose, allina)\nSalute(maryrose, carissa)\nUnnoted(maryrose)\nnot Least(maryrose)\nPreform(maryrose, allina)\nPreform(maryrose, carissa)\nforall x (Molded(x) and Least(x) -> not Preform(x, izak))\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, maryrose) -> Sleepwalk(maryrose, allina))\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, allina) and Salute(allina, izak) -> Preform(allina, maryrose))\n\nSalute(allina, izak)\n\ntherefore Salute(allina, izak)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The camille is areolar. The camille insulate the elwira. The camille overawe the joane. The camille overawe the elwira. The joane praise the camille. The joane is areolar. The joane is executive. The joane does not visit the franny. The franny praise the camille. The franny is cryptical. The elwira praise the joane. The elwira praise the franny. The elwira is areolar. The elwira is not wintery. The elwira overawe the joane. The elwira overawe the franny. If something is executive and wintery then it does not visit the camille. If something insulate the elwira then the elwira insulate the joane. If something insulate the joane and the joane praise the camille then the joane overawe the elwira. The joane overawe the franny.", "logic": "\nAreolar(camille)\nInsulate(camille, elwira)\nOverawe(camille, joane)\nOverawe(camille, elwira)\nPraise(joane, camille)\nAreolar(joane)\nExecutive(joane)\nnot Overawe(joane, franny)\nPraise(franny, camille)\nCryptical(franny)\nPraise(elwira, joane)\nPraise(elwira, franny)\nAreolar(elwira)\nnot Wintery(elwira)\nOverawe(elwira, joane)\nOverawe(elwira, franny)\nforall x (Executive(x) and Wintery(x) -> not Overawe(x, camille))\nforall x (Insulate(x, elwira) -> Insulate(elwira, joane))\nforall x (Insulate(x, joane) and Praise(joane, camille) -> Overawe(joane, elwira))\n\nOverawe(joane, franny)\n\ntherefore not Overawe(joane, franny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The caron is trite. The caron tyrannize the estella. The caron lithograph the hayden. The caron lithograph the estella. The hayden luge the caron. The hayden is trite. The hayden is spiky. The hayden does not visit the creighton. The creighton luge the caron. The creighton is infrasonic. The estella luge the hayden. The estella luge the creighton. The estella is trite. The estella is not judaic. The estella lithograph the hayden. The estella lithograph the creighton. If something is spiky and judaic then it does not visit the caron. If something tyrannize the estella then the estella tyrannize the hayden. If something tyrannize the hayden and the hayden luge the caron then the hayden lithograph the estella. The estella tyrannize the hayden.", "logic": "\nTrite(caron)\nTyrannize(caron, estella)\nLithograph(caron, hayden)\nLithograph(caron, estella)\nLuge(hayden, caron)\nTrite(hayden)\nSpiky(hayden)\nnot Lithograph(hayden, creighton)\nLuge(creighton, caron)\nInfrasonic(creighton)\nLuge(estella, hayden)\nLuge(estella, creighton)\nTrite(estella)\nnot Judaic(estella)\nLithograph(estella, hayden)\nLithograph(estella, creighton)\nforall x (Spiky(x) and Judaic(x) -> not Lithograph(x, caron))\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, estella) -> Tyrannize(estella, hayden))\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, hayden) and Luge(hayden, caron) -> Lithograph(hayden, estella))\n\nTyrannize(estella, hayden)\n\nTyrannize(caron, estella) and forall x (Tyrannize(x, estella) -> Tyrannize(estella, hayden)) -> therefore Tyrannize(estella, hayden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The joby is lined. The joby cronk the anastasia. The joby comply the tymothy. The joby comply the anastasia. The tymothy shove the joby. The tymothy is lined. The tymothy is classic. The tymothy does not visit the boyce. The boyce shove the joby. The boyce is ungodly. The anastasia shove the tymothy. The anastasia shove the boyce. The anastasia is lined. The anastasia is not victorian. The anastasia comply the tymothy. The anastasia comply the boyce. If something is classic and victorian then it does not visit the joby. If something cronk the anastasia then the anastasia cronk the tymothy. If something cronk the tymothy and the tymothy shove the joby then the tymothy comply the anastasia. The anastasia does not see the tymothy.", "logic": "\nLined(joby)\nCronk(joby, anastasia)\nComply(joby, tymothy)\nComply(joby, anastasia)\nShove(tymothy, joby)\nLined(tymothy)\nClassic(tymothy)\nnot Comply(tymothy, boyce)\nShove(boyce, joby)\nUngodly(boyce)\nShove(anastasia, tymothy)\nShove(anastasia, boyce)\nLined(anastasia)\nnot Victorian(anastasia)\nComply(anastasia, tymothy)\nComply(anastasia, boyce)\nforall x (Classic(x) and Victorian(x) -> not Comply(x, joby))\nforall x (Cronk(x, anastasia) -> Cronk(anastasia, tymothy))\nforall x (Cronk(x, tymothy) and Shove(tymothy, joby) -> Comply(tymothy, anastasia))\n\nnot Cronk(anastasia, tymothy)\n\nCronk(joby, anastasia) and forall x (Cronk(x, anastasia) -> Cronk(anastasia, tymothy)) -> therefore Cronk(anastasia, tymothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The wells is ironical. The wells spellbind the koral. The wells iodize the sherri. The wells iodize the koral. The sherri cream the wells. The sherri is ironical. The sherri is lustreless. The sherri does not visit the edgardo. The edgardo cream the wells. The edgardo is bilocular. The koral cream the sherri. The koral cream the edgardo. The koral is ironical. The koral is not reclaimed. The koral iodize the sherri. The koral iodize the edgardo. If something is lustreless and reclaimed then it does not visit the wells. If something spellbind the koral then the koral spellbind the sherri. If something spellbind the sherri and the sherri cream the wells then the sherri iodize the koral. The sherri iodize the koral.", "logic": "\nIronical(wells)\nSpellbind(wells, koral)\nIodize(wells, sherri)\nIodize(wells, koral)\nCream(sherri, wells)\nIronical(sherri)\nLustreless(sherri)\nnot Iodize(sherri, edgardo)\nCream(edgardo, wells)\nBilocular(edgardo)\nCream(koral, sherri)\nCream(koral, edgardo)\nIronical(koral)\nnot Reclaimed(koral)\nIodize(koral, sherri)\nIodize(koral, edgardo)\nforall x (Lustreless(x) and Reclaimed(x) -> not Iodize(x, wells))\nforall x (Spellbind(x, koral) -> Spellbind(koral, sherri))\nforall x (Spellbind(x, sherri) and Cream(sherri, wells) -> Iodize(sherri, koral))\n\nIodize(sherri, koral)\n\nSpellbind(wells, koral) and forall x (Spellbind(x, koral) -> Spellbind(koral, sherri)) -> therefore Spellbind(koral, sherri) Spellbind(koral, sherri) and Cream(sherri, wells) and forall x (Spellbind(x, sherri) and Cream(sherri, wells) -> Iodize(sherri, koral)) -> therefore Iodize(sherri, koral)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The kalvin is inquiring. The kalvin embank the hoyt. The kalvin freewheel the phillis. The kalvin freewheel the hoyt. The phillis girth the kalvin. The phillis is inquiring. The phillis is witting. The phillis does not visit the teddie. The teddie girth the kalvin. The teddie is clitoric. The hoyt girth the phillis. The hoyt girth the teddie. The hoyt is inquiring. The hoyt is not transeunt. The hoyt freewheel the phillis. The hoyt freewheel the teddie. If something is witting and transeunt then it does not visit the kalvin. If something embank the hoyt then the hoyt embank the phillis. If something embank the phillis and the phillis girth the kalvin then the phillis freewheel the hoyt. The phillis does not visit the hoyt.", "logic": "\nInquiring(kalvin)\nEmbank(kalvin, hoyt)\nFreewheel(kalvin, phillis)\nFreewheel(kalvin, hoyt)\nGirth(phillis, kalvin)\nInquiring(phillis)\nWitting(phillis)\nnot Freewheel(phillis, teddie)\nGirth(teddie, kalvin)\nClitoric(teddie)\nGirth(hoyt, phillis)\nGirth(hoyt, teddie)\nInquiring(hoyt)\nnot Transeunt(hoyt)\nFreewheel(hoyt, phillis)\nFreewheel(hoyt, teddie)\nforall x (Witting(x) and Transeunt(x) -> not Freewheel(x, kalvin))\nforall x (Embank(x, hoyt) -> Embank(hoyt, phillis))\nforall x (Embank(x, phillis) and Girth(phillis, kalvin) -> Freewheel(phillis, hoyt))\n\nnot Freewheel(phillis, hoyt)\n\nEmbank(kalvin, hoyt) and forall x (Embank(x, hoyt) -> Embank(hoyt, phillis)) -> therefore Embank(hoyt, phillis) Embank(hoyt, phillis) and Girth(phillis, kalvin) and forall x (Embank(x, phillis) and Girth(phillis, kalvin) -> Freewheel(phillis, hoyt)) -> therefore Freewheel(phillis, hoyt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The luella is balletic. The luella recount the jenni. The luella impanel the kylen. The luella impanel the jenni. The kylen crouch the luella. The kylen is balletic. The kylen is impolite. The kylen does not visit the carolyne. The carolyne crouch the luella. The carolyne is venetian. The jenni crouch the kylen. The jenni crouch the carolyne. The jenni is balletic. The jenni is not mated. The jenni impanel the kylen. The jenni impanel the carolyne. If something is impolite and mated then it does not visit the luella. If something recount the jenni then the jenni recount the kylen. If something recount the kylen and the kylen crouch the luella then the kylen impanel the jenni. The jenni does not chase the jenni.", "logic": "\nBalletic(luella)\nRecount(luella, jenni)\nImpanel(luella, kylen)\nImpanel(luella, jenni)\nCrouch(kylen, luella)\nBalletic(kylen)\nImpolite(kylen)\nnot Impanel(kylen, carolyne)\nCrouch(carolyne, luella)\nVenetian(carolyne)\nCrouch(jenni, kylen)\nCrouch(jenni, carolyne)\nBalletic(jenni)\nnot Mated(jenni)\nImpanel(jenni, kylen)\nImpanel(jenni, carolyne)\nforall x (Impolite(x) and Mated(x) -> not Impanel(x, luella))\nforall x (Recount(x, jenni) -> Recount(jenni, kylen))\nforall x (Recount(x, kylen) and Crouch(kylen, luella) -> Impanel(kylen, jenni))\n\nnot Crouch(jenni, jenni)\n\nnot Crouch(jenni, jenni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The joellen is witting. The joellen flay the vernice. The joellen copyedit the vassily. The joellen copyedit the vernice. The vassily effect the joellen. The vassily is witting. The vassily is braky. The vassily does not visit the tella. The tella effect the joellen. The tella is uptown. The vernice effect the vassily. The vernice effect the tella. The vernice is witting. The vernice is not exquisite. The vernice copyedit the vassily. The vernice copyedit the tella. If something is braky and exquisite then it does not visit the joellen. If something flay the vernice then the vernice flay the vassily. If something flay the vassily and the vassily effect the joellen then the vassily copyedit the vernice. The vassily copyedit the vassily.", "logic": "\nWitting(joellen)\nFlay(joellen, vernice)\nCopyedit(joellen, vassily)\nCopyedit(joellen, vernice)\nEffect(vassily, joellen)\nWitting(vassily)\nBraky(vassily)\nnot Copyedit(vassily, tella)\nEffect(tella, joellen)\nUptown(tella)\nEffect(vernice, vassily)\nEffect(vernice, tella)\nWitting(vernice)\nnot Exquisite(vernice)\nCopyedit(vernice, vassily)\nCopyedit(vernice, tella)\nforall x (Braky(x) and Exquisite(x) -> not Copyedit(x, joellen))\nforall x (Flay(x, vernice) -> Flay(vernice, vassily))\nforall x (Flay(x, vassily) and Effect(vassily, joellen) -> Copyedit(vassily, vernice))\n\nCopyedit(vassily, vassily)\n\nCopyedit(vassily, vassily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The yetta is unfrozen. The yetta impugn the godwin. The yetta foil the hildagard. The yetta foil the godwin. The hildagard oblige the yetta. The hildagard is unfrozen. The hildagard is ajar. The hildagard does not visit the ambur. The ambur oblige the yetta. The ambur is cubistic. The godwin oblige the hildagard. The godwin oblige the ambur. The godwin is unfrozen. The godwin is not efficient. The godwin foil the hildagard. The godwin foil the ambur. If something is ajar and efficient then it does not visit the yetta. If something impugn the godwin then the godwin impugn the hildagard. If something impugn the hildagard and the hildagard oblige the yetta then the hildagard foil the godwin. The yetta does not chase the ambur.", "logic": "\nUnfrozen(yetta)\nImpugn(yetta, godwin)\nFoil(yetta, hildagard)\nFoil(yetta, godwin)\nOblige(hildagard, yetta)\nUnfrozen(hildagard)\nAjar(hildagard)\nnot Foil(hildagard, ambur)\nOblige(ambur, yetta)\nCubistic(ambur)\nOblige(godwin, hildagard)\nOblige(godwin, ambur)\nUnfrozen(godwin)\nnot Efficient(godwin)\nFoil(godwin, hildagard)\nFoil(godwin, ambur)\nforall x (Ajar(x) and Efficient(x) -> not Foil(x, yetta))\nforall x (Impugn(x, godwin) -> Impugn(godwin, hildagard))\nforall x (Impugn(x, hildagard) and Oblige(hildagard, yetta) -> Foil(hildagard, godwin))\n\nnot Oblige(yetta, ambur)\n\nnot Oblige(yetta, ambur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The boyd is impotent. The boyd founder the brigit. The boyd kvetch the karoly. The boyd kvetch the brigit. The karoly misaddress the boyd. The karoly is impotent. The karoly is doltish. The karoly does not visit the doreen. The doreen misaddress the boyd. The doreen is boylike. The brigit misaddress the karoly. The brigit misaddress the doreen. The brigit is impotent. The brigit is not fifteen. The brigit kvetch the karoly. The brigit kvetch the doreen. If something is doltish and fifteen then it does not visit the boyd. If something founder the brigit then the brigit founder the karoly. If something founder the karoly and the karoly misaddress the boyd then the karoly kvetch the brigit. The boyd founder the boyd.", "logic": "\nImpotent(boyd)\nFounder(boyd, brigit)\nKvetch(boyd, karoly)\nKvetch(boyd, brigit)\nMisaddress(karoly, boyd)\nImpotent(karoly)\nDoltish(karoly)\nnot Kvetch(karoly, doreen)\nMisaddress(doreen, boyd)\nBoylike(doreen)\nMisaddress(brigit, karoly)\nMisaddress(brigit, doreen)\nImpotent(brigit)\nnot Fifteen(brigit)\nKvetch(brigit, karoly)\nKvetch(brigit, doreen)\nforall x (Doltish(x) and Fifteen(x) -> not Kvetch(x, boyd))\nforall x (Founder(x, brigit) -> Founder(brigit, karoly))\nforall x (Founder(x, karoly) and Misaddress(karoly, boyd) -> Kvetch(karoly, brigit))\n\nFounder(boyd, boyd)\n\nFounder(boyd, boyd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The kimberlyn is convincing. The kimberlyn scry the sabine. The kimberlyn slew the oscar. The kimberlyn slew the sabine. The oscar collapse the kimberlyn. The oscar is convincing. The oscar is cubic. The oscar does not visit the cherrita. The cherrita collapse the kimberlyn. The cherrita is longish. The sabine collapse the oscar. The sabine collapse the cherrita. The sabine is convincing. The sabine is not sceptered. The sabine slew the oscar. The sabine slew the cherrita. If something is cubic and sceptered then it does not visit the kimberlyn. If something scry the sabine then the sabine scry the oscar. If something scry the oscar and the oscar collapse the kimberlyn then the oscar slew the sabine. The sabine is not blue.", "logic": "\nConvincing(kimberlyn)\nScry(kimberlyn, sabine)\nSlew(kimberlyn, oscar)\nSlew(kimberlyn, sabine)\nCollapse(oscar, kimberlyn)\nConvincing(oscar)\nCubic(oscar)\nnot Slew(oscar, cherrita)\nCollapse(cherrita, kimberlyn)\nLongish(cherrita)\nCollapse(sabine, oscar)\nCollapse(sabine, cherrita)\nConvincing(sabine)\nnot Sceptered(sabine)\nSlew(sabine, oscar)\nSlew(sabine, cherrita)\nforall x (Cubic(x) and Sceptered(x) -> not Slew(x, kimberlyn))\nforall x (Scry(x, sabine) -> Scry(sabine, oscar))\nforall x (Scry(x, oscar) and Collapse(oscar, kimberlyn) -> Slew(oscar, sabine))\n\nnot Blue(sabine)\n\nnot Blue(sabine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The erny is melancholy. The erny burnish the ambrose. The erny misspell the myrah. The erny misspell the ambrose. The myrah raid the erny. The myrah is melancholy. The myrah is wearying. The myrah does not visit the merrielle. The merrielle raid the erny. The merrielle is disruptive. The ambrose raid the myrah. The ambrose raid the merrielle. The ambrose is melancholy. The ambrose is not rivalrous. The ambrose misspell the myrah. The ambrose misspell the merrielle. If something is wearying and rivalrous then it does not visit the erny. If something burnish the ambrose then the ambrose burnish the myrah. If something burnish the myrah and the myrah raid the erny then the myrah misspell the ambrose. The ambrose is wearying.", "logic": "\nMelancholy(erny)\nBurnish(erny, ambrose)\nMisspell(erny, myrah)\nMisspell(erny, ambrose)\nRaid(myrah, erny)\nMelancholy(myrah)\nWearying(myrah)\nnot Misspell(myrah, merrielle)\nRaid(merrielle, erny)\nDisruptive(merrielle)\nRaid(ambrose, myrah)\nRaid(ambrose, merrielle)\nMelancholy(ambrose)\nnot Rivalrous(ambrose)\nMisspell(ambrose, myrah)\nMisspell(ambrose, merrielle)\nforall x (Wearying(x) and Rivalrous(x) -> not Misspell(x, erny))\nforall x (Burnish(x, ambrose) -> Burnish(ambrose, myrah))\nforall x (Burnish(x, myrah) and Raid(myrah, erny) -> Misspell(myrah, ambrose))\n\nWearying(ambrose)\n\nWearying(ambrose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-453"} {"premises": "The shannen coif the raj. The shannen is deaf. The shannen trek the braden. The shannen dissuade the raj. The shannen dissuade the braden. The raj is clarifying. The raj is twofold. The raj trek the shannen. The raj trek the braden. The raj dissuade the shannen. The braden coif the shannen. The braden coif the raj. The braden is twofold. The braden is perennial. The braden trek the raj. If the shannen coif the raj and the raj coif the braden then the raj dissuade the shannen. If someone dissuade the raj and they see the shannen then the raj is clarifying. If the raj is twofold then the raj coif the braden. If someone trek the raj then they are separatist. If someone dissuade the raj then they see the braden. If someone dissuade the raj then the raj dissuade the shannen. If someone coif the braden and the braden is separatist then the braden dissuade the raj. If someone trek the shannen then the shannen coif the raj. The braden is perennial.", "logic": "\nCoif(shannen, raj)\nDeaf(shannen)\nTrek(shannen, braden)\nDissuade(shannen, raj)\nDissuade(shannen, braden)\nClarifying(raj)\nTwofold(raj)\nTrek(raj, shannen)\nTrek(raj, braden)\nDissuade(raj, shannen)\nCoif(braden, shannen)\nCoif(braden, raj)\nTwofold(braden)\nPerennial(braden)\nTrek(braden, raj)\nCoif(shannen, raj) and Coif(raj, braden) -> Dissuade(raj, shannen)\nforall x (Dissuade(x, raj) and Trek(x, shannen) -> Clarifying(raj))\nTwofold(raj) -> Coif(raj, braden)\nforall x (Trek(x, raj) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Dissuade(x, raj) -> Trek(x, braden))\nforall x (Dissuade(x, raj) -> Dissuade(raj, shannen))\nforall x (Coif(x, braden) and Separatist(braden) -> Dissuade(braden, raj))\nforall x (Trek(x, shannen) -> Coif(shannen, raj))\n\nPerennial(braden)\n\ntherefore Perennial(braden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The caroline relativize the allyson. The caroline is apteral. The caroline urge the bebe. The caroline ruggedize the allyson. The caroline ruggedize the bebe. The allyson is acquired. The allyson is countless. The allyson urge the caroline. The allyson urge the bebe. The allyson ruggedize the caroline. The bebe relativize the caroline. The bebe relativize the allyson. The bebe is countless. The bebe is resupine. The bebe urge the allyson. If the caroline relativize the allyson and the allyson relativize the bebe then the allyson ruggedize the caroline. If someone ruggedize the allyson and they see the caroline then the allyson is acquired. If the allyson is countless then the allyson relativize the bebe. If someone urge the allyson then they are obese. If someone ruggedize the allyson then they see the bebe. If someone ruggedize the allyson then the allyson ruggedize the caroline. If someone relativize the bebe and the bebe is obese then the bebe ruggedize the allyson. If someone urge the caroline then the caroline relativize the allyson. The allyson does not visit the caroline.", "logic": "\nRelativize(caroline, allyson)\nApteral(caroline)\nUrge(caroline, bebe)\nRuggedize(caroline, allyson)\nRuggedize(caroline, bebe)\nAcquired(allyson)\nCountless(allyson)\nUrge(allyson, caroline)\nUrge(allyson, bebe)\nRuggedize(allyson, caroline)\nRelativize(bebe, caroline)\nRelativize(bebe, allyson)\nCountless(bebe)\nResupine(bebe)\nUrge(bebe, allyson)\nRelativize(caroline, allyson) and Relativize(allyson, bebe) -> Ruggedize(allyson, caroline)\nforall x (Ruggedize(x, allyson) and Urge(x, caroline) -> Acquired(allyson))\nCountless(allyson) -> Relativize(allyson, bebe)\nforall x (Urge(x, allyson) -> Obese(x))\nforall x (Ruggedize(x, allyson) -> Urge(x, bebe))\nforall x (Ruggedize(x, allyson) -> Ruggedize(allyson, caroline))\nforall x (Relativize(x, bebe) and Obese(bebe) -> Ruggedize(bebe, allyson))\nforall x (Urge(x, caroline) -> Relativize(caroline, allyson))\n\nnot Ruggedize(allyson, caroline)\n\ntherefore Ruggedize(allyson, caroline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The ibrahim embarrass the angelle. The ibrahim is womanlike. The ibrahim lapse the ardys. The ibrahim wrick the angelle. The ibrahim wrick the ardys. The angelle is requested. The angelle is strait. The angelle lapse the ibrahim. The angelle lapse the ardys. The angelle wrick the ibrahim. The ardys embarrass the ibrahim. The ardys embarrass the angelle. The ardys is strait. The ardys is gnarled. The ardys lapse the angelle. If the ibrahim embarrass the angelle and the angelle embarrass the ardys then the angelle wrick the ibrahim. If someone wrick the angelle and they see the ibrahim then the angelle is requested. If the angelle is strait then the angelle embarrass the ardys. If someone lapse the angelle then they are premature. If someone wrick the angelle then they see the ardys. If someone wrick the angelle then the angelle wrick the ibrahim. If someone embarrass the ardys and the ardys is premature then the ardys wrick the angelle. If someone lapse the ibrahim then the ibrahim embarrass the angelle. The angelle embarrass the ardys.", "logic": "\nEmbarrass(ibrahim, angelle)\nWomanlike(ibrahim)\nLapse(ibrahim, ardys)\nWrick(ibrahim, angelle)\nWrick(ibrahim, ardys)\nRequested(angelle)\nStrait(angelle)\nLapse(angelle, ibrahim)\nLapse(angelle, ardys)\nWrick(angelle, ibrahim)\nEmbarrass(ardys, ibrahim)\nEmbarrass(ardys, angelle)\nStrait(ardys)\nGnarled(ardys)\nLapse(ardys, angelle)\nEmbarrass(ibrahim, angelle) and Embarrass(angelle, ardys) -> Wrick(angelle, ibrahim)\nforall x (Wrick(x, angelle) and Lapse(x, ibrahim) -> Requested(angelle))\nStrait(angelle) -> Embarrass(angelle, ardys)\nforall x (Lapse(x, angelle) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Wrick(x, angelle) -> Lapse(x, ardys))\nforall x (Wrick(x, angelle) -> Wrick(angelle, ibrahim))\nforall x (Embarrass(x, ardys) and Premature(ardys) -> Wrick(ardys, angelle))\nforall x (Lapse(x, ibrahim) -> Embarrass(ibrahim, angelle))\n\nEmbarrass(angelle, ardys)\n\nStrait(angelle) and Strait(angelle) -> Embarrass(angelle, ardys) -> therefore Embarrass(angelle, ardys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The peg humble the vivien. The peg is battered. The peg lave the tremaine. The peg punish the vivien. The peg punish the tremaine. The vivien is downtown. The vivien is acoustical. The vivien lave the peg. The vivien lave the tremaine. The vivien punish the peg. The tremaine humble the peg. The tremaine humble the vivien. The tremaine is acoustical. The tremaine is annelid. The tremaine lave the vivien. If the peg humble the vivien and the vivien humble the tremaine then the vivien punish the peg. If someone punish the vivien and they see the peg then the vivien is downtown. If the vivien is acoustical then the vivien humble the tremaine. If someone lave the vivien then they are sedgy. If someone punish the vivien then they see the tremaine. If someone punish the vivien then the vivien punish the peg. If someone humble the tremaine and the tremaine is sedgy then the tremaine punish the vivien. If someone lave the peg then the peg humble the vivien. The vivien does not eat the tremaine.", "logic": "\nHumble(peg, vivien)\nBattered(peg)\nLave(peg, tremaine)\nPunish(peg, vivien)\nPunish(peg, tremaine)\nDowntown(vivien)\nAcoustical(vivien)\nLave(vivien, peg)\nLave(vivien, tremaine)\nPunish(vivien, peg)\nHumble(tremaine, peg)\nHumble(tremaine, vivien)\nAcoustical(tremaine)\nAnnelid(tremaine)\nLave(tremaine, vivien)\nHumble(peg, vivien) and Humble(vivien, tremaine) -> Punish(vivien, peg)\nforall x (Punish(x, vivien) and Lave(x, peg) -> Downtown(vivien))\nAcoustical(vivien) -> Humble(vivien, tremaine)\nforall x (Lave(x, vivien) -> Sedgy(x))\nforall x (Punish(x, vivien) -> Lave(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Punish(x, vivien) -> Punish(vivien, peg))\nforall x (Humble(x, tremaine) and Sedgy(tremaine) -> Punish(tremaine, vivien))\nforall x (Lave(x, peg) -> Humble(peg, vivien))\n\nnot Humble(vivien, tremaine)\n\nAcoustical(vivien) and Acoustical(vivien) -> Humble(vivien, tremaine) -> therefore Humble(vivien, tremaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The catherin summarize the philbert. The catherin is aided. The catherin dizzy the tamara. The catherin tell the philbert. The catherin tell the tamara. The philbert is prickly. The philbert is confining. The philbert dizzy the catherin. The philbert dizzy the tamara. The philbert tell the catherin. The tamara summarize the catherin. The tamara summarize the philbert. The tamara is confining. The tamara is undivided. The tamara dizzy the philbert. If the catherin summarize the philbert and the philbert summarize the tamara then the philbert tell the catherin. If someone tell the philbert and they see the catherin then the philbert is prickly. If the philbert is confining then the philbert summarize the tamara. If someone dizzy the philbert then they are glinting. If someone tell the philbert then they see the tamara. If someone tell the philbert then the philbert tell the catherin. If someone summarize the tamara and the tamara is glinting then the tamara tell the philbert. If someone dizzy the catherin then the catherin summarize the philbert. The tamara tell the philbert.", "logic": "\nSummarize(catherin, philbert)\nAided(catherin)\nDizzy(catherin, tamara)\nTell(catherin, philbert)\nTell(catherin, tamara)\nPrickly(philbert)\nConfining(philbert)\nDizzy(philbert, catherin)\nDizzy(philbert, tamara)\nTell(philbert, catherin)\nSummarize(tamara, catherin)\nSummarize(tamara, philbert)\nConfining(tamara)\nUndivided(tamara)\nDizzy(tamara, philbert)\nSummarize(catherin, philbert) and Summarize(philbert, tamara) -> Tell(philbert, catherin)\nforall x (Tell(x, philbert) and Dizzy(x, catherin) -> Prickly(philbert))\nConfining(philbert) -> Summarize(philbert, tamara)\nforall x (Dizzy(x, philbert) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Tell(x, philbert) -> Dizzy(x, tamara))\nforall x (Tell(x, philbert) -> Tell(philbert, catherin))\nforall x (Summarize(x, tamara) and Glinting(tamara) -> Tell(tamara, philbert))\nforall x (Dizzy(x, catherin) -> Summarize(catherin, philbert))\n\nTell(tamara, philbert)\n\nConfining(philbert) and Confining(philbert) -> Summarize(philbert, tamara) -> therefore Summarize(philbert, tamara) Dizzy(tamara, philbert) and forall x (Dizzy(x, philbert) -> Glinting(x)) -> therefore Glinting(tamara) Summarize(philbert, tamara) and Glinting(tamara) and forall x (Summarize(x, tamara) and Glinting(tamara) -> Tell(tamara, philbert)) -> therefore Tell(tamara, philbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The ariadne enamel the natasha. The ariadne is quebecois. The ariadne note the karylin. The ariadne honour the natasha. The ariadne honour the karylin. The natasha is shortish. The natasha is utilized. The natasha note the ariadne. The natasha note the karylin. The natasha honour the ariadne. The karylin enamel the ariadne. The karylin enamel the natasha. The karylin is utilized. The karylin is careworn. The karylin note the natasha. If the ariadne enamel the natasha and the natasha enamel the karylin then the natasha honour the ariadne. If someone honour the natasha and they see the ariadne then the natasha is shortish. If the natasha is utilized then the natasha enamel the karylin. If someone note the natasha then they are immodest. If someone honour the natasha then they see the karylin. If someone honour the natasha then the natasha honour the ariadne. If someone enamel the karylin and the karylin is immodest then the karylin honour the natasha. If someone note the ariadne then the ariadne enamel the natasha. The karylin does not visit the natasha.", "logic": "\nEnamel(ariadne, natasha)\nQuebecois(ariadne)\nNote(ariadne, karylin)\nHonour(ariadne, natasha)\nHonour(ariadne, karylin)\nShortish(natasha)\nUtilized(natasha)\nNote(natasha, ariadne)\nNote(natasha, karylin)\nHonour(natasha, ariadne)\nEnamel(karylin, ariadne)\nEnamel(karylin, natasha)\nUtilized(karylin)\nCareworn(karylin)\nNote(karylin, natasha)\nEnamel(ariadne, natasha) and Enamel(natasha, karylin) -> Honour(natasha, ariadne)\nforall x (Honour(x, natasha) and Note(x, ariadne) -> Shortish(natasha))\nUtilized(natasha) -> Enamel(natasha, karylin)\nforall x (Note(x, natasha) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Honour(x, natasha) -> Note(x, karylin))\nforall x (Honour(x, natasha) -> Honour(natasha, ariadne))\nforall x (Enamel(x, karylin) and Immodest(karylin) -> Honour(karylin, natasha))\nforall x (Note(x, ariadne) -> Enamel(ariadne, natasha))\n\nnot Honour(karylin, natasha)\n\nUtilized(natasha) and Utilized(natasha) -> Enamel(natasha, karylin) -> therefore Enamel(natasha, karylin) Note(karylin, natasha) and forall x (Note(x, natasha) -> Immodest(x)) -> therefore Immodest(karylin) Enamel(natasha, karylin) and Immodest(karylin) and forall x (Enamel(x, karylin) and Immodest(karylin) -> Honour(karylin, natasha)) -> therefore Honour(karylin, natasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The elizabeth uncover the dickey. The elizabeth is biomedical. The elizabeth deface the didi. The elizabeth alchemise the dickey. The elizabeth alchemise the didi. The dickey is mature. The dickey is meshugge. The dickey deface the elizabeth. The dickey deface the didi. The dickey alchemise the elizabeth. The didi uncover the elizabeth. The didi uncover the dickey. The didi is meshugge. The didi is pasted. The didi deface the dickey. If the elizabeth uncover the dickey and the dickey uncover the didi then the dickey alchemise the elizabeth. If someone alchemise the dickey and they see the elizabeth then the dickey is mature. If the dickey is meshugge then the dickey uncover the didi. If someone deface the dickey then they are frenzied. If someone alchemise the dickey then they see the didi. If someone alchemise the dickey then the dickey alchemise the elizabeth. If someone uncover the didi and the didi is frenzied then the didi alchemise the dickey. If someone deface the elizabeth then the elizabeth uncover the dickey. The dickey is not frenzied.", "logic": "\nUncover(elizabeth, dickey)\nBiomedical(elizabeth)\nDeface(elizabeth, didi)\nAlchemise(elizabeth, dickey)\nAlchemise(elizabeth, didi)\nMature(dickey)\nMeshugge(dickey)\nDeface(dickey, elizabeth)\nDeface(dickey, didi)\nAlchemise(dickey, elizabeth)\nUncover(didi, elizabeth)\nUncover(didi, dickey)\nMeshugge(didi)\nPasted(didi)\nDeface(didi, dickey)\nUncover(elizabeth, dickey) and Uncover(dickey, didi) -> Alchemise(dickey, elizabeth)\nforall x (Alchemise(x, dickey) and Deface(x, elizabeth) -> Mature(dickey))\nMeshugge(dickey) -> Uncover(dickey, didi)\nforall x (Deface(x, dickey) -> Frenzied(x))\nforall x (Alchemise(x, dickey) -> Deface(x, didi))\nforall x (Alchemise(x, dickey) -> Alchemise(dickey, elizabeth))\nforall x (Uncover(x, didi) and Frenzied(didi) -> Alchemise(didi, dickey))\nforall x (Deface(x, elizabeth) -> Uncover(elizabeth, dickey))\n\nnot Frenzied(dickey)\n\nforall x (Deface(x, dickey) -> Frenzied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The mercie divaricate the adrienne. The mercie is paperback. The mercie syncopate the myke. The mercie disorient the adrienne. The mercie disorient the myke. The adrienne is twopenny. The adrienne is peregrine. The adrienne syncopate the mercie. The adrienne syncopate the myke. The adrienne disorient the mercie. The myke divaricate the mercie. The myke divaricate the adrienne. The myke is peregrine. The myke is traitorous. The myke syncopate the adrienne. If the mercie divaricate the adrienne and the adrienne divaricate the myke then the adrienne disorient the mercie. If someone disorient the adrienne and they see the mercie then the adrienne is twopenny. If the adrienne is peregrine then the adrienne divaricate the myke. If someone syncopate the adrienne then they are nonuple. If someone disorient the adrienne then they see the myke. If someone disorient the adrienne then the adrienne disorient the mercie. If someone divaricate the myke and the myke is nonuple then the myke disorient the adrienne. If someone syncopate the mercie then the mercie divaricate the adrienne. The mercie is nonuple.", "logic": "\nDivaricate(mercie, adrienne)\nPaperback(mercie)\nSyncopate(mercie, myke)\nDisorient(mercie, adrienne)\nDisorient(mercie, myke)\nTwopenny(adrienne)\nPeregrine(adrienne)\nSyncopate(adrienne, mercie)\nSyncopate(adrienne, myke)\nDisorient(adrienne, mercie)\nDivaricate(myke, mercie)\nDivaricate(myke, adrienne)\nPeregrine(myke)\nTraitorous(myke)\nSyncopate(myke, adrienne)\nDivaricate(mercie, adrienne) and Divaricate(adrienne, myke) -> Disorient(adrienne, mercie)\nforall x (Disorient(x, adrienne) and Syncopate(x, mercie) -> Twopenny(adrienne))\nPeregrine(adrienne) -> Divaricate(adrienne, myke)\nforall x (Syncopate(x, adrienne) -> Nonuple(x))\nforall x (Disorient(x, adrienne) -> Syncopate(x, myke))\nforall x (Disorient(x, adrienne) -> Disorient(adrienne, mercie))\nforall x (Divaricate(x, myke) and Nonuple(myke) -> Disorient(myke, adrienne))\nforall x (Syncopate(x, mercie) -> Divaricate(mercie, adrienne))\n\nNonuple(mercie)\n\nforall x (Syncopate(x, adrienne) -> Nonuple(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The marijo keen the mattias. The marijo is autosomal. The marijo engild the mabel. The marijo flux the mattias. The marijo flux the mabel. The mattias is certain. The mattias is assamese. The mattias engild the marijo. The mattias engild the mabel. The mattias flux the marijo. The mabel keen the marijo. The mabel keen the mattias. The mabel is assamese. The mabel is hatched. The mabel engild the mattias. If the marijo keen the mattias and the mattias keen the mabel then the mattias flux the marijo. If someone flux the mattias and they see the marijo then the mattias is certain. If the mattias is assamese then the mattias keen the mabel. If someone engild the mattias then they are mean. If someone flux the mattias then they see the mabel. If someone flux the mattias then the mattias flux the marijo. If someone keen the mabel and the mabel is mean then the mabel flux the mattias. If someone engild the marijo then the marijo keen the mattias. The marijo does not eat the mabel.", "logic": "\nKeen(marijo, mattias)\nAutosomal(marijo)\nEngild(marijo, mabel)\nFlux(marijo, mattias)\nFlux(marijo, mabel)\nCertain(mattias)\nAssamese(mattias)\nEngild(mattias, marijo)\nEngild(mattias, mabel)\nFlux(mattias, marijo)\nKeen(mabel, marijo)\nKeen(mabel, mattias)\nAssamese(mabel)\nHatched(mabel)\nEngild(mabel, mattias)\nKeen(marijo, mattias) and Keen(mattias, mabel) -> Flux(mattias, marijo)\nforall x (Flux(x, mattias) and Engild(x, marijo) -> Certain(mattias))\nAssamese(mattias) -> Keen(mattias, mabel)\nforall x (Engild(x, mattias) -> Mean(x))\nforall x (Flux(x, mattias) -> Engild(x, mabel))\nforall x (Flux(x, mattias) -> Flux(mattias, marijo))\nforall x (Keen(x, mabel) and Mean(mabel) -> Flux(mabel, mattias))\nforall x (Engild(x, marijo) -> Keen(marijo, mattias))\n\nnot Keen(marijo, mabel)\n\nnot Keen(marijo, mabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The theressa boil the mady. The theressa is stupefied. The theressa behave the annabella. The theressa worm the mady. The theressa worm the annabella. The mady is improved. The mady is impalpable. The mady behave the theressa. The mady behave the annabella. The mady worm the theressa. The annabella boil the theressa. The annabella boil the mady. The annabella is impalpable. The annabella is boon. The annabella behave the mady. If the theressa boil the mady and the mady boil the annabella then the mady worm the theressa. If someone worm the mady and they see the theressa then the mady is improved. If the mady is impalpable then the mady boil the annabella. If someone behave the mady then they are soleless. If someone worm the mady then they see the annabella. If someone worm the mady then the mady worm the theressa. If someone boil the annabella and the annabella is soleless then the annabella worm the mady. If someone behave the theressa then the theressa boil the mady. The theressa behave the mady.", "logic": "\nBoil(theressa, mady)\nStupefied(theressa)\nBehave(theressa, annabella)\nWorm(theressa, mady)\nWorm(theressa, annabella)\nImproved(mady)\nImpalpable(mady)\nBehave(mady, theressa)\nBehave(mady, annabella)\nWorm(mady, theressa)\nBoil(annabella, theressa)\nBoil(annabella, mady)\nImpalpable(annabella)\nBoon(annabella)\nBehave(annabella, mady)\nBoil(theressa, mady) and Boil(mady, annabella) -> Worm(mady, theressa)\nforall x (Worm(x, mady) and Behave(x, theressa) -> Improved(mady))\nImpalpable(mady) -> Boil(mady, annabella)\nforall x (Behave(x, mady) -> Soleless(x))\nforall x (Worm(x, mady) -> Behave(x, annabella))\nforall x (Worm(x, mady) -> Worm(mady, theressa))\nforall x (Boil(x, annabella) and Soleless(annabella) -> Worm(annabella, mady))\nforall x (Behave(x, theressa) -> Boil(theressa, mady))\n\nBehave(theressa, mady)\n\nBehave(theressa, mady) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The michelle blanch the dolores. The michelle is cambodian. The michelle pulverise the meade. The michelle titrate the dolores. The michelle titrate the meade. The dolores is isochronal. The dolores is scopal. The dolores pulverise the michelle. The dolores pulverise the meade. The dolores titrate the michelle. The meade blanch the michelle. The meade blanch the dolores. The meade is scopal. The meade is cuban. The meade pulverise the dolores. If the michelle blanch the dolores and the dolores blanch the meade then the dolores titrate the michelle. If someone titrate the dolores and they see the michelle then the dolores is isochronal. If the dolores is scopal then the dolores blanch the meade. If someone pulverise the dolores then they are gladdened. If someone titrate the dolores then they see the meade. If someone titrate the dolores then the dolores titrate the michelle. If someone blanch the meade and the meade is gladdened then the meade titrate the dolores. If someone pulverise the michelle then the michelle blanch the dolores. The dolores does not eat the dolores.", "logic": "\nBlanch(michelle, dolores)\nCambodian(michelle)\nPulverise(michelle, meade)\nTitrate(michelle, dolores)\nTitrate(michelle, meade)\nIsochronal(dolores)\nScopal(dolores)\nPulverise(dolores, michelle)\nPulverise(dolores, meade)\nTitrate(dolores, michelle)\nBlanch(meade, michelle)\nBlanch(meade, dolores)\nScopal(meade)\nCuban(meade)\nPulverise(meade, dolores)\nBlanch(michelle, dolores) and Blanch(dolores, meade) -> Titrate(dolores, michelle)\nforall x (Titrate(x, dolores) and Pulverise(x, michelle) -> Isochronal(dolores))\nScopal(dolores) -> Blanch(dolores, meade)\nforall x (Pulverise(x, dolores) -> Gladdened(x))\nforall x (Titrate(x, dolores) -> Pulverise(x, meade))\nforall x (Titrate(x, dolores) -> Titrate(dolores, michelle))\nforall x (Blanch(x, meade) and Gladdened(meade) -> Titrate(meade, dolores))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, michelle) -> Blanch(michelle, dolores))\n\nnot Blanch(dolores, dolores)\n\nnot Blanch(dolores, dolores) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "The koressa pillory the alvera. The koressa is semisweet. The koressa fascinate the shawn. The koressa intermit the alvera. The koressa intermit the shawn. The alvera is holy. The alvera is ductless. The alvera fascinate the koressa. The alvera fascinate the shawn. The alvera intermit the koressa. The shawn pillory the koressa. The shawn pillory the alvera. The shawn is ductless. The shawn is vapid. The shawn fascinate the alvera. If the koressa pillory the alvera and the alvera pillory the shawn then the alvera intermit the koressa. If someone intermit the alvera and they see the koressa then the alvera is holy. If the alvera is ductless then the alvera pillory the shawn. If someone fascinate the alvera then they are needlelike. If someone intermit the alvera then they see the shawn. If someone intermit the alvera then the alvera intermit the koressa. If someone pillory the shawn and the shawn is needlelike then the shawn intermit the alvera. If someone fascinate the koressa then the koressa pillory the alvera. The shawn is holy.", "logic": "\nPillory(koressa, alvera)\nSemisweet(koressa)\nFascinate(koressa, shawn)\nIntermit(koressa, alvera)\nIntermit(koressa, shawn)\nHoly(alvera)\nDuctless(alvera)\nFascinate(alvera, koressa)\nFascinate(alvera, shawn)\nIntermit(alvera, koressa)\nPillory(shawn, koressa)\nPillory(shawn, alvera)\nDuctless(shawn)\nVapid(shawn)\nFascinate(shawn, alvera)\nPillory(koressa, alvera) and Pillory(alvera, shawn) -> Intermit(alvera, koressa)\nforall x (Intermit(x, alvera) and Fascinate(x, koressa) -> Holy(alvera))\nDuctless(alvera) -> Pillory(alvera, shawn)\nforall x (Fascinate(x, alvera) -> Needlelike(x))\nforall x (Intermit(x, alvera) -> Fascinate(x, shawn))\nforall x (Intermit(x, alvera) -> Intermit(alvera, koressa))\nforall x (Pillory(x, shawn) and Needlelike(shawn) -> Intermit(shawn, alvera))\nforall x (Fascinate(x, koressa) -> Pillory(koressa, alvera))\n\nHoly(shawn)\n\nHoly(shawn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1920"} {"premises": "Rhett is mingy. Rhett is awless. Rhett is cupular. Rhett is pillared. Rhett is humanlike. Rhett is gratifying. Lawton is mingy. Lawton is cupular. Lawton is pillared. Lawton is gratifying. Ursula is mingy. Ursula is awless. Ursula is pillared. Ursula is humanlike. Ulysses is humanlike. Ulysses is ovoid. If someone is mingy then they are pillared. If Rhett is humanlike and Rhett is ovoid then Rhett is cupular. Rough people are cupular. If someone is awless and pillared then they are mingy. If Ursula is gratifying then Ursula is ovoid. If someone is awless then they are gratifying. If someone is mingy and humanlike then they are cupular. If someone is mingy then they are gratifying. Ursula is mingy.", "logic": "\nMingy(rhett)\nAwless(rhett)\nCupular(rhett)\nPillared(rhett)\nHumanlike(rhett)\nGratifying(rhett)\nMingy(lawton)\nCupular(lawton)\nPillared(lawton)\nGratifying(lawton)\nMingy(ursula)\nAwless(ursula)\nPillared(ursula)\nHumanlike(ursula)\nHumanlike(ulysses)\nOvoid(ulysses)\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> Pillared(x))\nHumanlike(rhett) and Ovoid(rhett) -> Cupular(rhett)\nforall x (Pillared(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Awless(x) and Pillared(x) -> Mingy(x))\nGratifying(ursula) -> Ovoid(ursula)\nforall x (Awless(x) -> Gratifying(x))\nforall x (Mingy(x) and Humanlike(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> Gratifying(x))\n\nMingy(ursula)\n\ntherefore Mingy(ursula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Clarissa is concerted. Clarissa is nagging. Clarissa is hypoactive. Clarissa is clxx. Clarissa is criminal. Clarissa is forgiving. Steven is concerted. Steven is hypoactive. Steven is clxx. Steven is forgiving. Dulcinea is concerted. Dulcinea is nagging. Dulcinea is clxx. Dulcinea is criminal. Ken is criminal. Ken is gooey. If someone is concerted then they are clxx. If Clarissa is criminal and Clarissa is gooey then Clarissa is hypoactive. Rough people are hypoactive. If someone is nagging and clxx then they are concerted. If Dulcinea is forgiving then Dulcinea is gooey. If someone is nagging then they are forgiving. If someone is concerted and criminal then they are hypoactive. If someone is concerted then they are forgiving. Dulcinea is not clxx.", "logic": "\nConcerted(clarissa)\nNagging(clarissa)\nHypoactive(clarissa)\nClxx(clarissa)\nCriminal(clarissa)\nForgiving(clarissa)\nConcerted(steven)\nHypoactive(steven)\nClxx(steven)\nForgiving(steven)\nConcerted(dulcinea)\nNagging(dulcinea)\nClxx(dulcinea)\nCriminal(dulcinea)\nCriminal(ken)\nGooey(ken)\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Clxx(x))\nCriminal(clarissa) and Gooey(clarissa) -> Hypoactive(clarissa)\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Nagging(x) and Clxx(x) -> Concerted(x))\nForgiving(dulcinea) -> Gooey(dulcinea)\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Forgiving(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) and Criminal(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Forgiving(x))\n\nnot Clxx(dulcinea)\n\ntherefore Clxx(dulcinea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Wood is petallike. Wood is epimorphic. Wood is smoothened. Wood is ossified. Wood is adnate. Wood is victimised. Pembroke is petallike. Pembroke is smoothened. Pembroke is ossified. Pembroke is victimised. Malinde is petallike. Malinde is epimorphic. Malinde is ossified. Malinde is adnate. Estelle is adnate. Estelle is aboral. If someone is petallike then they are ossified. If Wood is adnate and Wood is aboral then Wood is smoothened. Rough people are smoothened. If someone is epimorphic and ossified then they are petallike. If Malinde is victimised then Malinde is aboral. If someone is epimorphic then they are victimised. If someone is petallike and adnate then they are smoothened. If someone is petallike then they are victimised. Malinde is victimised.", "logic": "\nPetallike(wood)\nEpimorphic(wood)\nSmoothened(wood)\nOssified(wood)\nAdnate(wood)\nVictimised(wood)\nPetallike(pembroke)\nSmoothened(pembroke)\nOssified(pembroke)\nVictimised(pembroke)\nPetallike(malinde)\nEpimorphic(malinde)\nOssified(malinde)\nAdnate(malinde)\nAdnate(estelle)\nAboral(estelle)\nforall x (Petallike(x) -> Ossified(x))\nAdnate(wood) and Aboral(wood) -> Smoothened(wood)\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Smoothened(x))\nforall x (Epimorphic(x) and Ossified(x) -> Petallike(x))\nVictimised(malinde) -> Aboral(malinde)\nforall x (Epimorphic(x) -> Victimised(x))\nforall x (Petallike(x) and Adnate(x) -> Smoothened(x))\nforall x (Petallike(x) -> Victimised(x))\n\nVictimised(malinde)\n\nPetallike(malinde) and forall x (Petallike(x) -> Victimised(x)) -> therefore Victimised(malinde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Milicent is localized. Milicent is mourning. Milicent is wizard. Milicent is congealed. Milicent is cocky. Milicent is unabashed. Valencia is localized. Valencia is wizard. Valencia is congealed. Valencia is unabashed. Kendre is localized. Kendre is mourning. Kendre is congealed. Kendre is cocky. Stephenie is cocky. Stephenie is ionian. If someone is localized then they are congealed. If Milicent is cocky and Milicent is ionian then Milicent is wizard. Rough people are wizard. If someone is mourning and congealed then they are localized. If Kendre is unabashed then Kendre is ionian. If someone is mourning then they are unabashed. If someone is localized and cocky then they are wizard. If someone is localized then they are unabashed. Kendre is not wizard.", "logic": "\nLocalized(milicent)\nMourning(milicent)\nWizard(milicent)\nCongealed(milicent)\nCocky(milicent)\nUnabashed(milicent)\nLocalized(valencia)\nWizard(valencia)\nCongealed(valencia)\nUnabashed(valencia)\nLocalized(kendre)\nMourning(kendre)\nCongealed(kendre)\nCocky(kendre)\nCocky(stephenie)\nIonian(stephenie)\nforall x (Localized(x) -> Congealed(x))\nCocky(milicent) and Ionian(milicent) -> Wizard(milicent)\nforall x (Congealed(x) -> Wizard(x))\nforall x (Mourning(x) and Congealed(x) -> Localized(x))\nUnabashed(kendre) -> Ionian(kendre)\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Unabashed(x))\nforall x (Localized(x) and Cocky(x) -> Wizard(x))\nforall x (Localized(x) -> Unabashed(x))\n\nnot Wizard(kendre)\n\nCongealed(kendre) and forall x (Congealed(x) -> Wizard(x)) -> therefore Wizard(kendre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Elana is protestant. Elana is omnipotent. Elana is uncanny. Elana is asymmetric. Elana is bayesian. Elana is blase. Arlette is protestant. Arlette is uncanny. Arlette is asymmetric. Arlette is blase. Elonore is protestant. Elonore is omnipotent. Elonore is asymmetric. Elonore is bayesian. Thebault is bayesian. Thebault is utile. If someone is protestant then they are asymmetric. If Elana is bayesian and Elana is utile then Elana is uncanny. Rough people are uncanny. If someone is omnipotent and asymmetric then they are protestant. If Elonore is blase then Elonore is utile. If someone is omnipotent then they are blase. If someone is protestant and bayesian then they are uncanny. If someone is protestant then they are blase. Elonore is utile.", "logic": "\nProtestant(elana)\nOmnipotent(elana)\nUncanny(elana)\nAsymmetric(elana)\nBayesian(elana)\nBlase(elana)\nProtestant(arlette)\nUncanny(arlette)\nAsymmetric(arlette)\nBlase(arlette)\nProtestant(elonore)\nOmnipotent(elonore)\nAsymmetric(elonore)\nBayesian(elonore)\nBayesian(thebault)\nUtile(thebault)\nforall x (Protestant(x) -> Asymmetric(x))\nBayesian(elana) and Utile(elana) -> Uncanny(elana)\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) -> Uncanny(x))\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) and Asymmetric(x) -> Protestant(x))\nBlase(elonore) -> Utile(elonore)\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Protestant(x) and Bayesian(x) -> Uncanny(x))\nforall x (Protestant(x) -> Blase(x))\n\nUtile(elonore)\n\nProtestant(elonore) and forall x (Protestant(x) -> Blase(x)) -> therefore Blase(elonore) Blase(elonore) and Blase(elonore) -> Utile(elonore) -> therefore Utile(elonore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Rorie is extensible. Rorie is manichee. Rorie is acuminate. Rorie is ferine. Rorie is frostian. Rorie is eighty. Hadria is extensible. Hadria is acuminate. Hadria is ferine. Hadria is eighty. Vivianna is extensible. Vivianna is manichee. Vivianna is ferine. Vivianna is frostian. Neila is frostian. Neila is unshaven. If someone is extensible then they are ferine. If Rorie is frostian and Rorie is unshaven then Rorie is acuminate. Rough people are acuminate. If someone is manichee and ferine then they are extensible. If Vivianna is eighty then Vivianna is unshaven. If someone is manichee then they are eighty. If someone is extensible and frostian then they are acuminate. If someone is extensible then they are eighty. Vivianna is not unshaven.", "logic": "\nExtensible(rorie)\nManichee(rorie)\nAcuminate(rorie)\nFerine(rorie)\nFrostian(rorie)\nEighty(rorie)\nExtensible(hadria)\nAcuminate(hadria)\nFerine(hadria)\nEighty(hadria)\nExtensible(vivianna)\nManichee(vivianna)\nFerine(vivianna)\nFrostian(vivianna)\nFrostian(neila)\nUnshaven(neila)\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Ferine(x))\nFrostian(rorie) and Unshaven(rorie) -> Acuminate(rorie)\nforall x (Ferine(x) -> Acuminate(x))\nforall x (Manichee(x) and Ferine(x) -> Extensible(x))\nEighty(vivianna) -> Unshaven(vivianna)\nforall x (Manichee(x) -> Eighty(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) and Frostian(x) -> Acuminate(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Eighty(x))\n\nnot Unshaven(vivianna)\n\nExtensible(vivianna) and forall x (Extensible(x) -> Eighty(x)) -> therefore Eighty(vivianna) Eighty(vivianna) and Eighty(vivianna) -> Unshaven(vivianna) -> therefore Unshaven(vivianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Rubina is thirtieth. Rubina is patronized. Rubina is boss. Rubina is heavenly. Rubina is twisted. Rubina is reigning. Bjorne is thirtieth. Bjorne is boss. Bjorne is heavenly. Bjorne is reigning. Norah is thirtieth. Norah is patronized. Norah is heavenly. Norah is twisted. Winfield is twisted. Winfield is insectan. If someone is thirtieth then they are heavenly. If Rubina is twisted and Rubina is insectan then Rubina is boss. Rough people are boss. If someone is patronized and heavenly then they are thirtieth. If Norah is reigning then Norah is insectan. If someone is patronized then they are reigning. If someone is thirtieth and twisted then they are boss. If someone is thirtieth then they are reigning. Winfield is not heavenly.", "logic": "\nThirtieth(rubina)\nPatronized(rubina)\nBoss(rubina)\nHeavenly(rubina)\nTwisted(rubina)\nReigning(rubina)\nThirtieth(bjorne)\nBoss(bjorne)\nHeavenly(bjorne)\nReigning(bjorne)\nThirtieth(norah)\nPatronized(norah)\nHeavenly(norah)\nTwisted(norah)\nTwisted(winfield)\nInsectan(winfield)\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Heavenly(x))\nTwisted(rubina) and Insectan(rubina) -> Boss(rubina)\nforall x (Heavenly(x) -> Boss(x))\nforall x (Patronized(x) and Heavenly(x) -> Thirtieth(x))\nReigning(norah) -> Insectan(norah)\nforall x (Patronized(x) -> Reigning(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Twisted(x) -> Boss(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Reigning(x))\n\nnot Heavenly(winfield)\n\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Heavenly(x)) <- forall x (Patronized(x) and Heavenly(x) -> Thirtieth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Walther is excellent. Walther is notifiable. Walther is clerical. Walther is backswept. Walther is volcanic. Walther is witty. Dennis is excellent. Dennis is clerical. Dennis is backswept. Dennis is witty. Flower is excellent. Flower is notifiable. Flower is backswept. Flower is volcanic. Starla is volcanic. Starla is softheaded. If someone is excellent then they are backswept. If Walther is volcanic and Walther is softheaded then Walther is clerical. Rough people are clerical. If someone is notifiable and backswept then they are excellent. If Flower is witty then Flower is softheaded. If someone is notifiable then they are witty. If someone is excellent and volcanic then they are clerical. If someone is excellent then they are witty. Starla is clerical.", "logic": "\nExcellent(walther)\nNotifiable(walther)\nClerical(walther)\nBackswept(walther)\nVolcanic(walther)\nWitty(walther)\nExcellent(dennis)\nClerical(dennis)\nBackswept(dennis)\nWitty(dennis)\nExcellent(flower)\nNotifiable(flower)\nBackswept(flower)\nVolcanic(flower)\nVolcanic(starla)\nSoftheaded(starla)\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Backswept(x))\nVolcanic(walther) and Softheaded(walther) -> Clerical(walther)\nforall x (Backswept(x) -> Clerical(x))\nforall x (Notifiable(x) and Backswept(x) -> Excellent(x))\nWitty(flower) -> Softheaded(flower)\nforall x (Notifiable(x) -> Witty(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) and Volcanic(x) -> Clerical(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Witty(x))\n\nClerical(starla)\n\nforall x (Backswept(x) -> Clerical(x)) <- forall x (Excellent(x) -> Backswept(x)) <- forall x (Notifiable(x) and Backswept(x) -> Excellent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Bendite is untracked. Bendite is vain. Bendite is anabolic. Bendite is catabolic. Bendite is pettish. Bendite is deserved. Tyrone is untracked. Tyrone is anabolic. Tyrone is catabolic. Tyrone is deserved. Natalina is untracked. Natalina is vain. Natalina is catabolic. Natalina is pettish. Emanuel is pettish. Emanuel is manifest. If someone is untracked then they are catabolic. If Bendite is pettish and Bendite is manifest then Bendite is anabolic. Rough people are anabolic. If someone is vain and catabolic then they are untracked. If Natalina is deserved then Natalina is manifest. If someone is vain then they are deserved. If someone is untracked and pettish then they are anabolic. If someone is untracked then they are deserved. Emanuel is not deserved.", "logic": "\nUntracked(bendite)\nVain(bendite)\nAnabolic(bendite)\nCatabolic(bendite)\nPettish(bendite)\nDeserved(bendite)\nUntracked(tyrone)\nAnabolic(tyrone)\nCatabolic(tyrone)\nDeserved(tyrone)\nUntracked(natalina)\nVain(natalina)\nCatabolic(natalina)\nPettish(natalina)\nPettish(emanuel)\nManifest(emanuel)\nforall x (Untracked(x) -> Catabolic(x))\nPettish(bendite) and Manifest(bendite) -> Anabolic(bendite)\nforall x (Catabolic(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Vain(x) and Catabolic(x) -> Untracked(x))\nDeserved(natalina) -> Manifest(natalina)\nforall x (Vain(x) -> Deserved(x))\nforall x (Untracked(x) and Pettish(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Untracked(x) -> Deserved(x))\n\nnot Deserved(emanuel)\n\nforall x (Untracked(x) -> Deserved(x)) <- forall x (Vain(x) and Catabolic(x) -> Untracked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Nona is binaural. Nona is dissonant. Nona is cheeky. Nona is braless. Nona is catalectic. Nona is vocalic. Nevins is binaural. Nevins is cheeky. Nevins is braless. Nevins is vocalic. Bertina is binaural. Bertina is dissonant. Bertina is braless. Bertina is catalectic. Gardner is catalectic. Gardner is topped. If someone is binaural then they are braless. If Nona is catalectic and Nona is topped then Nona is cheeky. Rough people are cheeky. If someone is dissonant and braless then they are binaural. If Bertina is vocalic then Bertina is topped. If someone is dissonant then they are vocalic. If someone is binaural and catalectic then they are cheeky. If someone is binaural then they are vocalic. Nevins is topped.", "logic": "\nBinaural(nona)\nDissonant(nona)\nCheeky(nona)\nBraless(nona)\nCatalectic(nona)\nVocalic(nona)\nBinaural(nevins)\nCheeky(nevins)\nBraless(nevins)\nVocalic(nevins)\nBinaural(bertina)\nDissonant(bertina)\nBraless(bertina)\nCatalectic(bertina)\nCatalectic(gardner)\nTopped(gardner)\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Braless(x))\nCatalectic(nona) and Topped(nona) -> Cheeky(nona)\nforall x (Braless(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) and Braless(x) -> Binaural(x))\nVocalic(bertina) -> Topped(bertina)\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Vocalic(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) and Catalectic(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Vocalic(x))\n\nTopped(nevins)\n\nTopped(nevins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Floyd is tiptoe. Floyd is sinhalese. Floyd is hurtful. Floyd is unflurried. Floyd is auctorial. Floyd is mothproof. Bidget is tiptoe. Bidget is hurtful. Bidget is unflurried. Bidget is mothproof. Xavier is tiptoe. Xavier is sinhalese. Xavier is unflurried. Xavier is auctorial. Stevana is auctorial. Stevana is brushlike. If someone is tiptoe then they are unflurried. If Floyd is auctorial and Floyd is brushlike then Floyd is hurtful. Rough people are hurtful. If someone is sinhalese and unflurried then they are tiptoe. If Xavier is mothproof then Xavier is brushlike. If someone is sinhalese then they are mothproof. If someone is tiptoe and auctorial then they are hurtful. If someone is tiptoe then they are mothproof. Floyd is not brushlike.", "logic": "\nTiptoe(floyd)\nSinhalese(floyd)\nHurtful(floyd)\nUnflurried(floyd)\nAuctorial(floyd)\nMothproof(floyd)\nTiptoe(bidget)\nHurtful(bidget)\nUnflurried(bidget)\nMothproof(bidget)\nTiptoe(xavier)\nSinhalese(xavier)\nUnflurried(xavier)\nAuctorial(xavier)\nAuctorial(stevana)\nBrushlike(stevana)\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) -> Unflurried(x))\nAuctorial(floyd) and Brushlike(floyd) -> Hurtful(floyd)\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Hurtful(x))\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Unflurried(x) -> Tiptoe(x))\nMothproof(xavier) -> Brushlike(xavier)\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) and Auctorial(x) -> Hurtful(x))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) -> Mothproof(x))\n\nnot Brushlike(floyd)\n\nnot Brushlike(floyd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "Anabelle is squab. Anabelle is tittering. Anabelle is afeard. Anabelle is malcontent. Anabelle is yonder. Anabelle is reinforced. Hanna is squab. Hanna is afeard. Hanna is malcontent. Hanna is reinforced. Angelico is squab. Angelico is tittering. Angelico is malcontent. Angelico is yonder. Ulberto is yonder. Ulberto is prissy. If someone is squab then they are malcontent. If Anabelle is yonder and Anabelle is prissy then Anabelle is afeard. Rough people are afeard. If someone is tittering and malcontent then they are squab. If Angelico is reinforced then Angelico is prissy. If someone is tittering then they are reinforced. If someone is squab and yonder then they are afeard. If someone is squab then they are reinforced. Ulberto is tittering.", "logic": "\nSquab(anabelle)\nTittering(anabelle)\nAfeard(anabelle)\nMalcontent(anabelle)\nYonder(anabelle)\nReinforced(anabelle)\nSquab(hanna)\nAfeard(hanna)\nMalcontent(hanna)\nReinforced(hanna)\nSquab(angelico)\nTittering(angelico)\nMalcontent(angelico)\nYonder(angelico)\nYonder(ulberto)\nPrissy(ulberto)\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Malcontent(x))\nYonder(anabelle) and Prissy(anabelle) -> Afeard(anabelle)\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Afeard(x))\nforall x (Tittering(x) and Malcontent(x) -> Squab(x))\nReinforced(angelico) -> Prissy(angelico)\nforall x (Tittering(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) and Yonder(x) -> Afeard(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Reinforced(x))\n\nTittering(ulberto)\n\nTittering(ulberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1151"} {"premises": "The henderson resurge the torrance. The eugine resurge the henderson. The torrance capitalise the henderson. The evanne is lxiii. If the evanne is lxiii then the evanne resurge the henderson. If the torrance is handheld and the torrance tariff the henderson then the henderson capitalise the torrance. If someone resurge the henderson then they eat the torrance. The torrance capitalise the henderson.", "logic": "\nResurge(henderson, torrance)\nResurge(eugine, henderson)\nCapitalise(torrance, henderson)\nLxiii(evanne)\nLxiii(evanne) -> Resurge(evanne, henderson)\nHandheld(torrance) and Tariff(torrance, henderson) -> Capitalise(henderson, torrance)\nforall x (Resurge(x, henderson) -> Capitalise(x, torrance))\n\nCapitalise(torrance, henderson)\n\ntherefore Capitalise(torrance, henderson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The suellen plait the erl. The marillin plait the suellen. The erl moor the suellen. The harv is homey. If the harv is homey then the harv plait the suellen. If the erl is polydactyl and the erl compound the suellen then the suellen moor the erl. If someone plait the suellen then they eat the erl. The harv is not homey.", "logic": "\nPlait(suellen, erl)\nPlait(marillin, suellen)\nMoor(erl, suellen)\nHomey(harv)\nHomey(harv) -> Plait(harv, suellen)\nPolydactyl(erl) and Compound(erl, suellen) -> Moor(suellen, erl)\nforall x (Plait(x, suellen) -> Moor(x, erl))\n\nnot Homey(harv)\n\ntherefore Homey(harv)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The lacey skewer the yank. The melantha skewer the lacey. The yank fundraise the lacey. The cornela is lamblike. If the cornela is lamblike then the cornela skewer the lacey. If the yank is chassidic and the yank choir the lacey then the lacey fundraise the yank. If someone skewer the lacey then they eat the yank. The melantha fundraise the yank.", "logic": "\nSkewer(lacey, yank)\nSkewer(melantha, lacey)\nFundraise(yank, lacey)\nLamblike(cornela)\nLamblike(cornela) -> Skewer(cornela, lacey)\nChassidic(yank) and Choir(yank, lacey) -> Fundraise(lacey, yank)\nforall x (Skewer(x, lacey) -> Fundraise(x, yank))\n\nFundraise(melantha, yank)\n\nSkewer(melantha, lacey) and forall x (Skewer(x, lacey) -> Fundraise(x, yank)) -> therefore Fundraise(melantha, yank)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The ossie categorise the cayla. The ezra categorise the ossie. The cayla stuff the ossie. The philippe is manful. If the philippe is manful then the philippe categorise the ossie. If the cayla is untiring and the cayla palsy the ossie then the ossie stuff the cayla. If someone categorise the ossie then they eat the cayla. The philippe does not see the ossie.", "logic": "\nCategorise(ossie, cayla)\nCategorise(ezra, ossie)\nStuff(cayla, ossie)\nManful(philippe)\nManful(philippe) -> Categorise(philippe, ossie)\nUntiring(cayla) and Palsy(cayla, ossie) -> Stuff(ossie, cayla)\nforall x (Categorise(x, ossie) -> Stuff(x, cayla))\n\nnot Categorise(philippe, ossie)\n\nManful(philippe) and Manful(philippe) -> Categorise(philippe, ossie) -> therefore Categorise(philippe, ossie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The jameson chaw the lacee. The adelaide chaw the jameson. The lacee experiment the jameson. The deborah is uncharged. If the deborah is uncharged then the deborah chaw the jameson. If the lacee is spineless and the lacee bridle the jameson then the jameson experiment the lacee. If someone chaw the jameson then they eat the lacee. The deborah experiment the lacee.", "logic": "\nChaw(jameson, lacee)\nChaw(adelaide, jameson)\nExperiment(lacee, jameson)\nUncharged(deborah)\nUncharged(deborah) -> Chaw(deborah, jameson)\nSpineless(lacee) and Bridle(lacee, jameson) -> Experiment(jameson, lacee)\nforall x (Chaw(x, jameson) -> Experiment(x, lacee))\n\nExperiment(deborah, lacee)\n\nUncharged(deborah) and Uncharged(deborah) -> Chaw(deborah, jameson) -> therefore Chaw(deborah, jameson) Chaw(deborah, jameson) and forall x (Chaw(x, jameson) -> Experiment(x, lacee)) -> therefore Experiment(deborah, lacee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The anastasie baste the charlean. The kaylee baste the anastasie. The charlean muddle the anastasie. The leonanie is burlesque. If the leonanie is burlesque then the leonanie baste the anastasie. If the charlean is sauteed and the charlean generate the anastasie then the anastasie muddle the charlean. If someone baste the anastasie then they eat the charlean. The leonanie does not eat the charlean.", "logic": "\nBaste(anastasie, charlean)\nBaste(kaylee, anastasie)\nMuddle(charlean, anastasie)\nBurlesque(leonanie)\nBurlesque(leonanie) -> Baste(leonanie, anastasie)\nSauteed(charlean) and Generate(charlean, anastasie) -> Muddle(anastasie, charlean)\nforall x (Baste(x, anastasie) -> Muddle(x, charlean))\n\nnot Muddle(leonanie, charlean)\n\nBurlesque(leonanie) and Burlesque(leonanie) -> Baste(leonanie, anastasie) -> therefore Baste(leonanie, anastasie) Baste(leonanie, anastasie) and forall x (Baste(x, anastasie) -> Muddle(x, charlean)) -> therefore Muddle(leonanie, charlean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The paton reload the meridith. The angelle reload the paton. The meridith guarantee the paton. The roanna is extended. If the roanna is extended then the roanna reload the paton. If the meridith is eleventh and the meridith emancipate the paton then the paton guarantee the meridith. If someone reload the paton then they eat the meridith. The meridith does not eat the meridith.", "logic": "\nReload(paton, meridith)\nReload(angelle, paton)\nGuarantee(meridith, paton)\nExtended(roanna)\nExtended(roanna) -> Reload(roanna, paton)\nEleventh(meridith) and Emancipate(meridith, paton) -> Guarantee(paton, meridith)\nforall x (Reload(x, paton) -> Guarantee(x, meridith))\n\nnot Guarantee(meridith, meridith)\n\nforall x (Reload(x, paton) -> Guarantee(x, meridith)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The fawne joint the clara. The niki joint the fawne. The clara concertise the fawne. The reena is penetrable. If the reena is penetrable then the reena joint the fawne. If the clara is rwandan and the clara facsimile the fawne then the fawne concertise the clara. If someone joint the fawne then they eat the clara. The fawne concertise the clara.", "logic": "\nJoint(fawne, clara)\nJoint(niki, fawne)\nConcertise(clara, fawne)\nPenetrable(reena)\nPenetrable(reena) -> Joint(reena, fawne)\nRwandan(clara) and Facsimile(clara, fawne) -> Concertise(fawne, clara)\nforall x (Joint(x, fawne) -> Concertise(x, clara))\n\nConcertise(fawne, clara)\n\nRwandan(clara) and Facsimile(clara, fawne) -> Concertise(fawne, clara) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The pincus beautify the isadore. The carolyne beautify the pincus. The isadore lead the pincus. The blanche is fungal. If the blanche is fungal then the blanche beautify the pincus. If the isadore is cheerless and the isadore heal the pincus then the pincus lead the isadore. If someone beautify the pincus then they eat the isadore. The blanche does not like the carolyne.", "logic": "\nBeautify(pincus, isadore)\nBeautify(carolyne, pincus)\nLead(isadore, pincus)\nFungal(blanche)\nFungal(blanche) -> Beautify(blanche, pincus)\nCheerless(isadore) and Heal(isadore, pincus) -> Lead(pincus, isadore)\nforall x (Beautify(x, pincus) -> Lead(x, isadore))\n\nnot Heal(blanche, carolyne)\n\nnot Heal(blanche, carolyne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The dorotea disoblige the chuck. The billi disoblige the dorotea. The chuck befit the dorotea. The meridith is digestive. If the meridith is digestive then the meridith disoblige the dorotea. If the chuck is tetchy and the chuck bankroll the dorotea then the dorotea befit the chuck. If someone disoblige the dorotea then they eat the chuck. The chuck is blue.", "logic": "\nDisoblige(dorotea, chuck)\nDisoblige(billi, dorotea)\nBefit(chuck, dorotea)\nDigestive(meridith)\nDigestive(meridith) -> Disoblige(meridith, dorotea)\nTetchy(chuck) and Bankroll(chuck, dorotea) -> Befit(dorotea, chuck)\nforall x (Disoblige(x, dorotea) -> Befit(x, chuck))\n\nBlue(chuck)\n\nBlue(chuck) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The suzzy excavate the barnard. The bari excavate the suzzy. The barnard deodorise the suzzy. The goose is lviii. If the goose is lviii then the goose excavate the suzzy. If the barnard is minatory and the barnard strickle the suzzy then the suzzy deodorise the barnard. If someone excavate the suzzy then they eat the barnard. The goose is not big.", "logic": "\nExcavate(suzzy, barnard)\nExcavate(bari, suzzy)\nDeodorise(barnard, suzzy)\nLviii(goose)\nLviii(goose) -> Excavate(goose, suzzy)\nMinatory(barnard) and Strickle(barnard, suzzy) -> Deodorise(suzzy, barnard)\nforall x (Excavate(x, suzzy) -> Deodorise(x, barnard))\n\nnot Big(goose)\n\nnot Big(goose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "The estrella mildew the karie. The winfred mildew the estrella. The karie personate the estrella. The ismail is plumate. If the ismail is plumate then the ismail mildew the estrella. If the karie is exuberant and the karie alert the estrella then the estrella personate the karie. If someone mildew the estrella then they eat the karie. The karie is red.", "logic": "\nMildew(estrella, karie)\nMildew(winfred, estrella)\nPersonate(karie, estrella)\nPlumate(ismail)\nPlumate(ismail) -> Mildew(ismail, estrella)\nExuberant(karie) and Alert(karie, estrella) -> Personate(estrella, karie)\nforall x (Mildew(x, estrella) -> Personate(x, karie))\n\nRed(karie)\n\nRed(karie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1049"} {"premises": "Jordon is tame. Denna is visualised. Nannette is engrossing. Lynnette is albanian. If someone is engrossing and rancorous then they are lyonnaise. Red people are rancorous. All cheeselike people are rancorous. If Jordon is lyonnaise and Jordon is albanian then Jordon is not cheeselike. If someone is tame then they are cheeselike. If someone is engrossing then they are visualised. Big, tame people are not visualised. If someone is albanian and not lyonnaise then they are visualised. Nannette is engrossing.", "logic": "\nTame(jordon)\nVisualised(denna)\nEngrossing(nannette)\nAlbanian(lynnette)\nforall x (Engrossing(x) and Rancorous(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Cheeselike(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nLyonnaise(jordon) and Albanian(jordon) -> not Cheeselike(jordon)\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> Visualised(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) and Tame(x) -> not Visualised(x))\nforall x (Albanian(x) and not Lyonnaise(x) -> Visualised(x))\n\nEngrossing(nannette)\n\ntherefore Engrossing(nannette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Lorita is discontent. Christa is adnate. Judie is rounded. Eydie is marbleized. If someone is rounded and fabian then they are rearward. Red people are fabian. All unbound people are fabian. If Lorita is rearward and Lorita is marbleized then Lorita is not unbound. If someone is discontent then they are unbound. If someone is rounded then they are adnate. Big, discontent people are not adnate. If someone is marbleized and not rearward then they are adnate. Eydie is not marbleized.", "logic": "\nDiscontent(lorita)\nAdnate(christa)\nRounded(judie)\nMarbleized(eydie)\nforall x (Rounded(x) and Fabian(x) -> Rearward(x))\nforall x (Rounded(x) -> Fabian(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Fabian(x))\nRearward(lorita) and Marbleized(lorita) -> not Unbound(lorita)\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Unbound(x))\nforall x (Rounded(x) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Rearward(x) and Discontent(x) -> not Adnate(x))\nforall x (Marbleized(x) and not Rearward(x) -> Adnate(x))\n\nnot Marbleized(eydie)\n\ntherefore Marbleized(eydie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Leshia is lucid. Mylo is daredevil. Friedric is bristled. Katee is prox. If someone is bristled and acapnotic then they are burdensome. Red people are acapnotic. All revocable people are acapnotic. If Leshia is burdensome and Leshia is prox then Leshia is not revocable. If someone is lucid then they are revocable. If someone is bristled then they are daredevil. Big, lucid people are not daredevil. If someone is prox and not burdensome then they are daredevil. Friedric is daredevil.", "logic": "\nLucid(leshia)\nDaredevil(mylo)\nBristled(friedric)\nProx(katee)\nforall x (Bristled(x) and Acapnotic(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Bristled(x) -> Acapnotic(x))\nforall x (Revocable(x) -> Acapnotic(x))\nBurdensome(leshia) and Prox(leshia) -> not Revocable(leshia)\nforall x (Lucid(x) -> Revocable(x))\nforall x (Bristled(x) -> Daredevil(x))\nforall x (Burdensome(x) and Lucid(x) -> not Daredevil(x))\nforall x (Prox(x) and not Burdensome(x) -> Daredevil(x))\n\nDaredevil(friedric)\n\nBristled(friedric) and forall x (Bristled(x) -> Daredevil(x)) -> therefore Daredevil(friedric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Fazeel is turbinate. Mathilde is jocund. Wilhelm is lavish. Felipa is palpatory. If someone is lavish and arbitrable then they are retrorse. Red people are arbitrable. All cuspated people are arbitrable. If Fazeel is retrorse and Fazeel is palpatory then Fazeel is not cuspated. If someone is turbinate then they are cuspated. If someone is lavish then they are jocund. Big, turbinate people are not jocund. If someone is palpatory and not retrorse then they are jocund. Fazeel is not cuspated.", "logic": "\nTurbinate(fazeel)\nJocund(mathilde)\nLavish(wilhelm)\nPalpatory(felipa)\nforall x (Lavish(x) and Arbitrable(x) -> Retrorse(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Cuspated(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nRetrorse(fazeel) and Palpatory(fazeel) -> not Cuspated(fazeel)\nforall x (Turbinate(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Retrorse(x) and Turbinate(x) -> not Jocund(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and not Retrorse(x) -> Jocund(x))\n\nnot Cuspated(fazeel)\n\nTurbinate(fazeel) and forall x (Turbinate(x) -> Cuspated(x)) -> therefore Cuspated(fazeel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Saudra is delusory. Garfinkel is contraband. Koo is cheesy. Malcah is despairing. If someone is cheesy and dyspnoeal then they are swinish. Red people are dyspnoeal. All ascetic people are dyspnoeal. If Saudra is swinish and Saudra is despairing then Saudra is not ascetic. If someone is delusory then they are ascetic. If someone is cheesy then they are contraband. Big, delusory people are not contraband. If someone is despairing and not swinish then they are contraband. Koo is swinish.", "logic": "\nDelusory(saudra)\nContraband(garfinkel)\nCheesy(koo)\nDespairing(malcah)\nforall x (Cheesy(x) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Cheesy(x) -> Dyspnoeal(x))\nforall x (Ascetic(x) -> Dyspnoeal(x))\nSwinish(saudra) and Despairing(saudra) -> not Ascetic(saudra)\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nforall x (Cheesy(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Swinish(x) and Delusory(x) -> not Contraband(x))\nforall x (Despairing(x) and not Swinish(x) -> Contraband(x))\n\nSwinish(koo)\n\nCheesy(koo) and forall x (Cheesy(x) -> Dyspnoeal(x)) -> therefore Dyspnoeal(koo) Cheesy(koo) and Dyspnoeal(koo) and forall x (Cheesy(x) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> Swinish(x)) -> therefore Swinish(koo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Guenevere is roily. Aloysius is benthic. Candice is sculptured. Percy is raging. If someone is sculptured and putrid then they are procurable. Red people are putrid. All cragfast people are putrid. If Guenevere is procurable and Guenevere is raging then Guenevere is not cragfast. If someone is roily then they are cragfast. If someone is sculptured then they are benthic. Big, roily people are not benthic. If someone is raging and not procurable then they are benthic. Candice is not procurable.", "logic": "\nRoily(guenevere)\nBenthic(aloysius)\nSculptured(candice)\nRaging(percy)\nforall x (Sculptured(x) and Putrid(x) -> Procurable(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Cragfast(x) -> Putrid(x))\nProcurable(guenevere) and Raging(guenevere) -> not Cragfast(guenevere)\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) -> Benthic(x))\nforall x (Procurable(x) and Roily(x) -> not Benthic(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) and not Procurable(x) -> Benthic(x))\n\nnot Procurable(candice)\n\nSculptured(candice) and forall x (Sculptured(x) -> Putrid(x)) -> therefore Putrid(candice) Sculptured(candice) and Putrid(candice) and forall x (Sculptured(x) and Putrid(x) -> Procurable(x)) -> therefore Procurable(candice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Agnesse is prickly. Anastasie is gyroscopic. Rubina is hollywood. Rudolph is spicy. If someone is hollywood and roiled then they are sheepish. Red people are roiled. All splendid people are roiled. If Agnesse is sheepish and Agnesse is spicy then Agnesse is not splendid. If someone is prickly then they are splendid. If someone is hollywood then they are gyroscopic. Big, prickly people are not gyroscopic. If someone is spicy and not sheepish then they are gyroscopic. Anastasie is not sheepish.", "logic": "\nPrickly(agnesse)\nGyroscopic(anastasie)\nHollywood(rubina)\nSpicy(rudolph)\nforall x (Hollywood(x) and Roiled(x) -> Sheepish(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) -> Roiled(x))\nforall x (Splendid(x) -> Roiled(x))\nSheepish(agnesse) and Spicy(agnesse) -> not Splendid(agnesse)\nforall x (Prickly(x) -> Splendid(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Sheepish(x) and Prickly(x) -> not Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Spicy(x) and not Sheepish(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\n\nnot Sheepish(anastasie)\n\nforall x (Hollywood(x) and Roiled(x) -> Sheepish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Tamiko is agape. Marchall is mangy. Jerald is procurable. Arlette is altaic. If someone is procurable and unorthodox then they are chaldee. Red people are unorthodox. All formulated people are unorthodox. If Tamiko is chaldee and Tamiko is altaic then Tamiko is not formulated. If someone is agape then they are formulated. If someone is procurable then they are mangy. Big, agape people are not mangy. If someone is altaic and not chaldee then they are mangy. Arlette is formulated.", "logic": "\nAgape(tamiko)\nMangy(marchall)\nProcurable(jerald)\nAltaic(arlette)\nforall x (Procurable(x) and Unorthodox(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Procurable(x) -> Unorthodox(x))\nforall x (Formulated(x) -> Unorthodox(x))\nChaldee(tamiko) and Altaic(tamiko) -> not Formulated(tamiko)\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Formulated(x))\nforall x (Procurable(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) and Agape(x) -> not Mangy(x))\nforall x (Altaic(x) and not Chaldee(x) -> Mangy(x))\n\nFormulated(arlette)\n\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Formulated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Garold is columnlike. Erastus is pressing. Clarine is older. Chaddie is thirsty. If someone is older and buddhist then they are unbleached. Red people are buddhist. All unliveable people are buddhist. If Garold is unbleached and Garold is thirsty then Garold is not unliveable. If someone is columnlike then they are unliveable. If someone is older then they are pressing. Big, columnlike people are not pressing. If someone is thirsty and not unbleached then they are pressing. Erastus is not unliveable.", "logic": "\nColumnlike(garold)\nPressing(erastus)\nOlder(clarine)\nThirsty(chaddie)\nforall x (Older(x) and Buddhist(x) -> Unbleached(x))\nforall x (Older(x) -> Buddhist(x))\nforall x (Unliveable(x) -> Buddhist(x))\nUnbleached(garold) and Thirsty(garold) -> not Unliveable(garold)\nforall x (Columnlike(x) -> Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Older(x) -> Pressing(x))\nforall x (Unbleached(x) and Columnlike(x) -> not Pressing(x))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) and not Unbleached(x) -> Pressing(x))\n\nnot Unliveable(erastus)\n\nforall x (Columnlike(x) -> Unliveable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Marcio is ungraceful. Gwen is snug. Ericha is brusque. Nerissa is epicyclic. If someone is brusque and alate then they are eurasiatic. Red people are alate. All slavish people are alate. If Marcio is eurasiatic and Marcio is epicyclic then Marcio is not slavish. If someone is ungraceful then they are slavish. If someone is brusque then they are snug. Big, ungraceful people are not snug. If someone is epicyclic and not eurasiatic then they are snug. Gwen is epicyclic.", "logic": "\nUngraceful(marcio)\nSnug(gwen)\nBrusque(ericha)\nEpicyclic(nerissa)\nforall x (Brusque(x) and Alate(x) -> Eurasiatic(x))\nforall x (Brusque(x) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) -> Alate(x))\nEurasiatic(marcio) and Epicyclic(marcio) -> not Slavish(marcio)\nforall x (Ungraceful(x) -> Slavish(x))\nforall x (Brusque(x) -> Snug(x))\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) and Ungraceful(x) -> not Snug(x))\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) and not Eurasiatic(x) -> Snug(x))\n\nEpicyclic(gwen)\n\nEpicyclic(gwen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Enid is impressed. Karleen is acherontic. Merell is limbed. Marve is plumose. If someone is limbed and whitish then they are abuzz. Red people are whitish. All scripted people are whitish. If Enid is abuzz and Enid is plumose then Enid is not scripted. If someone is impressed then they are scripted. If someone is limbed then they are acherontic. Big, impressed people are not acherontic. If someone is plumose and not abuzz then they are acherontic. Enid is not plumose.", "logic": "\nImpressed(enid)\nAcherontic(karleen)\nLimbed(merell)\nPlumose(marve)\nforall x (Limbed(x) and Whitish(x) -> Abuzz(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) -> Whitish(x))\nforall x (Scripted(x) -> Whitish(x))\nAbuzz(enid) and Plumose(enid) -> not Scripted(enid)\nforall x (Impressed(x) -> Scripted(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Abuzz(x) and Impressed(x) -> not Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and not Abuzz(x) -> Acherontic(x))\n\nnot Plumose(enid)\n\nnot Plumose(enid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "Harli is hobnailed. Donica is assuming. Jacklyn is dummy. Ainslie is voluptuary. If someone is dummy and soled then they are ligneous. Red people are soled. All downmarket people are soled. If Harli is ligneous and Harli is voluptuary then Harli is not downmarket. If someone is hobnailed then they are downmarket. If someone is dummy then they are assuming. Big, hobnailed people are not assuming. If someone is voluptuary and not ligneous then they are assuming. Jacklyn is voluptuary.", "logic": "\nHobnailed(harli)\nAssuming(donica)\nDummy(jacklyn)\nVoluptuary(ainslie)\nforall x (Dummy(x) and Soled(x) -> Ligneous(x))\nforall x (Dummy(x) -> Soled(x))\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> Soled(x))\nLigneous(harli) and Voluptuary(harli) -> not Downmarket(harli)\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) -> Downmarket(x))\nforall x (Dummy(x) -> Assuming(x))\nforall x (Ligneous(x) and Hobnailed(x) -> not Assuming(x))\nforall x (Voluptuary(x) and not Ligneous(x) -> Assuming(x))\n\nVoluptuary(jacklyn)\n\nVoluptuary(jacklyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-730"} {"premises": "The robinia is ignited. The robinia miter the serena. The serena is bespoke. The serena miter the robinia. The serena does not see the robinia. The serena recoup the robinia. The oberon is ignited. The oberon miter the robinia. The oberon attire the robinia. The oberon does not visit the robinia. If something is semirigid and it attire the serena then the serena is semirigid. If something recoup the serena then it does not see the oberon. If something miter the robinia then it recoup the oberon. If something recoup the oberon then the oberon does not visit the serena. If something is ignited and it does not need the oberon then the oberon attire the robinia. If something is bearish and it does not visit the robinia then the robinia is bespoke. If something miter the serena and it does not visit the oberon then it is bearish. If something is bespoke then it is falling. The serena miter the robinia.", "logic": "\nIgnited(robinia)\nMiter(robinia, serena)\nBespoke(serena)\nMiter(serena, robinia)\nnot Attire(serena, robinia)\nRecoup(serena, robinia)\nIgnited(oberon)\nMiter(oberon, robinia)\nAttire(oberon, robinia)\nnot Recoup(oberon, robinia)\nforall x (Semirigid(x) and Attire(x, serena) -> Semirigid(serena))\nforall x (Recoup(x, serena) -> not Attire(x, oberon))\nforall x (Miter(x, robinia) -> Recoup(x, oberon))\nforall x (Recoup(x, oberon) -> not Recoup(oberon, serena))\nforall x (Ignited(x) and not Miter(x, oberon) -> Attire(oberon, robinia))\nforall x (Bearish(x) and not Recoup(x, robinia) -> Bespoke(robinia))\nforall x (Miter(x, serena) and not Recoup(x, oberon) -> Bearish(x))\nforall x (Bespoke(x) -> Falling(x))\n\nMiter(serena, robinia)\n\ntherefore Miter(serena, robinia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The pat is diminutive. The pat teem the micaela. The micaela is lunar. The micaela teem the pat. The micaela does not see the pat. The micaela thump the pat. The ginelle is diminutive. The ginelle teem the pat. The ginelle circumfuse the pat. The ginelle does not visit the pat. If something is impartial and it circumfuse the micaela then the micaela is impartial. If something thump the micaela then it does not see the ginelle. If something teem the pat then it thump the ginelle. If something thump the ginelle then the ginelle does not visit the micaela. If something is diminutive and it does not need the ginelle then the ginelle circumfuse the pat. If something is purebred and it does not visit the pat then the pat is lunar. If something teem the micaela and it does not visit the ginelle then it is purebred. If something is lunar then it is maximising. The micaela circumfuse the pat.", "logic": "\nDiminutive(pat)\nTeem(pat, micaela)\nLunar(micaela)\nTeem(micaela, pat)\nnot Circumfuse(micaela, pat)\nThump(micaela, pat)\nDiminutive(ginelle)\nTeem(ginelle, pat)\nCircumfuse(ginelle, pat)\nnot Thump(ginelle, pat)\nforall x (Impartial(x) and Circumfuse(x, micaela) -> Impartial(micaela))\nforall x (Thump(x, micaela) -> not Circumfuse(x, ginelle))\nforall x (Teem(x, pat) -> Thump(x, ginelle))\nforall x (Thump(x, ginelle) -> not Thump(ginelle, micaela))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) and not Teem(x, ginelle) -> Circumfuse(ginelle, pat))\nforall x (Purebred(x) and not Thump(x, pat) -> Lunar(pat))\nforall x (Teem(x, micaela) and not Thump(x, ginelle) -> Purebred(x))\nforall x (Lunar(x) -> Maximising(x))\n\nCircumfuse(micaela, pat)\n\ntherefore not Circumfuse(micaela, pat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The bernardo is pectinate. The bernardo doodle the jereme. The jereme is cured. The jereme doodle the bernardo. The jereme does not see the bernardo. The jereme shroud the bernardo. The udall is pectinate. The udall doodle the bernardo. The udall rack the bernardo. The udall does not visit the bernardo. If something is impending and it rack the jereme then the jereme is impending. If something shroud the jereme then it does not see the udall. If something doodle the bernardo then it shroud the udall. If something shroud the udall then the udall does not visit the jereme. If something is pectinate and it does not need the udall then the udall rack the bernardo. If something is swazi and it does not visit the bernardo then the bernardo is cured. If something doodle the jereme and it does not visit the udall then it is swazi. If something is cured then it is polyhedral. The udall shroud the udall.", "logic": "\nPectinate(bernardo)\nDoodle(bernardo, jereme)\nCured(jereme)\nDoodle(jereme, bernardo)\nnot Rack(jereme, bernardo)\nShroud(jereme, bernardo)\nPectinate(udall)\nDoodle(udall, bernardo)\nRack(udall, bernardo)\nnot Shroud(udall, bernardo)\nforall x (Impending(x) and Rack(x, jereme) -> Impending(jereme))\nforall x (Shroud(x, jereme) -> not Rack(x, udall))\nforall x (Doodle(x, bernardo) -> Shroud(x, udall))\nforall x (Shroud(x, udall) -> not Shroud(udall, jereme))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) and not Doodle(x, udall) -> Rack(udall, bernardo))\nforall x (Swazi(x) and not Shroud(x, bernardo) -> Cured(bernardo))\nforall x (Doodle(x, jereme) and not Shroud(x, udall) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) -> Polyhedral(x))\n\nShroud(udall, udall)\n\nDoodle(udall, bernardo) and forall x (Doodle(x, bernardo) -> Shroud(x, udall)) -> therefore Shroud(udall, udall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The mehetabel is pretty. The mehetabel scud the bidget. The bidget is oviform. The bidget scud the mehetabel. The bidget does not see the mehetabel. The bidget welt the mehetabel. The darlene is pretty. The darlene scud the mehetabel. The darlene unscramble the mehetabel. The darlene does not visit the mehetabel. If something is mesic and it unscramble the bidget then the bidget is mesic. If something welt the bidget then it does not see the darlene. If something scud the mehetabel then it welt the darlene. If something welt the darlene then the darlene does not visit the bidget. If something is pretty and it does not need the darlene then the darlene unscramble the mehetabel. If something is legitimate and it does not visit the mehetabel then the mehetabel is oviform. If something scud the bidget and it does not visit the darlene then it is legitimate. If something is oviform then it is unsalable. The bidget is not unsalable.", "logic": "\nPretty(mehetabel)\nScud(mehetabel, bidget)\nOviform(bidget)\nScud(bidget, mehetabel)\nnot Unscramble(bidget, mehetabel)\nWelt(bidget, mehetabel)\nPretty(darlene)\nScud(darlene, mehetabel)\nUnscramble(darlene, mehetabel)\nnot Welt(darlene, mehetabel)\nforall x (Mesic(x) and Unscramble(x, bidget) -> Mesic(bidget))\nforall x (Welt(x, bidget) -> not Unscramble(x, darlene))\nforall x (Scud(x, mehetabel) -> Welt(x, darlene))\nforall x (Welt(x, darlene) -> not Welt(darlene, bidget))\nforall x (Pretty(x) and not Scud(x, darlene) -> Unscramble(darlene, mehetabel))\nforall x (Legitimate(x) and not Welt(x, mehetabel) -> Oviform(mehetabel))\nforall x (Scud(x, bidget) and not Welt(x, darlene) -> Legitimate(x))\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Unsalable(x))\n\nnot Unsalable(bidget)\n\nOviform(bidget) and forall x (Oviform(x) -> Unsalable(x)) -> therefore Unsalable(bidget)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The brandise is irreverent. The brandise frisk the dorice. The dorice is eastward. The dorice frisk the brandise. The dorice does not see the brandise. The dorice amplify the brandise. The hermine is irreverent. The hermine frisk the brandise. The hermine deaminize the brandise. The hermine does not visit the brandise. If something is unruffled and it deaminize the dorice then the dorice is unruffled. If something amplify the dorice then it does not see the hermine. If something frisk the brandise then it amplify the hermine. If something amplify the hermine then the hermine does not visit the dorice. If something is irreverent and it does not need the hermine then the hermine deaminize the brandise. If something is inhumane and it does not visit the brandise then the brandise is eastward. If something frisk the dorice and it does not visit the hermine then it is inhumane. If something is eastward then it is western. The hermine does not visit the dorice.", "logic": "\nIrreverent(brandise)\nFrisk(brandise, dorice)\nEastward(dorice)\nFrisk(dorice, brandise)\nnot Deaminize(dorice, brandise)\nAmplify(dorice, brandise)\nIrreverent(hermine)\nFrisk(hermine, brandise)\nDeaminize(hermine, brandise)\nnot Amplify(hermine, brandise)\nforall x (Unruffled(x) and Deaminize(x, dorice) -> Unruffled(dorice))\nforall x (Amplify(x, dorice) -> not Deaminize(x, hermine))\nforall x (Frisk(x, brandise) -> Amplify(x, hermine))\nforall x (Amplify(x, hermine) -> not Amplify(hermine, dorice))\nforall x (Irreverent(x) and not Frisk(x, hermine) -> Deaminize(hermine, brandise))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and not Amplify(x, brandise) -> Eastward(brandise))\nforall x (Frisk(x, dorice) and not Amplify(x, hermine) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Western(x))\n\nnot Amplify(hermine, dorice)\n\nFrisk(dorice, brandise) and forall x (Frisk(x, brandise) -> Amplify(x, hermine)) -> therefore Amplify(dorice, hermine) Amplify(dorice, hermine) and forall x (Amplify(x, hermine) -> not Amplify(hermine, dorice)) -> therefore not Amplify(hermine, dorice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The kermie is myelic. The kermie widow the emilio. The emilio is impressed. The emilio widow the kermie. The emilio does not see the kermie. The emilio reunite the kermie. The esteban is myelic. The esteban widow the kermie. The esteban comfit the kermie. The esteban does not visit the kermie. If something is gentile and it comfit the emilio then the emilio is gentile. If something reunite the emilio then it does not see the esteban. If something widow the kermie then it reunite the esteban. If something reunite the esteban then the esteban does not visit the emilio. If something is myelic and it does not need the esteban then the esteban comfit the kermie. If something is collusive and it does not visit the kermie then the kermie is impressed. If something widow the emilio and it does not visit the esteban then it is collusive. If something is impressed then it is telescopic. The esteban reunite the emilio.", "logic": "\nMyelic(kermie)\nWidow(kermie, emilio)\nImpressed(emilio)\nWidow(emilio, kermie)\nnot Comfit(emilio, kermie)\nReunite(emilio, kermie)\nMyelic(esteban)\nWidow(esteban, kermie)\nComfit(esteban, kermie)\nnot Reunite(esteban, kermie)\nforall x (Gentile(x) and Comfit(x, emilio) -> Gentile(emilio))\nforall x (Reunite(x, emilio) -> not Comfit(x, esteban))\nforall x (Widow(x, kermie) -> Reunite(x, esteban))\nforall x (Reunite(x, esteban) -> not Reunite(esteban, emilio))\nforall x (Myelic(x) and not Widow(x, esteban) -> Comfit(esteban, kermie))\nforall x (Collusive(x) and not Reunite(x, kermie) -> Impressed(kermie))\nforall x (Widow(x, emilio) and not Reunite(x, esteban) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Impressed(x) -> Telescopic(x))\n\nReunite(esteban, emilio)\n\nWidow(emilio, kermie) and forall x (Widow(x, kermie) -> Reunite(x, esteban)) -> therefore Reunite(emilio, esteban) Reunite(emilio, esteban) and forall x (Reunite(x, esteban) -> not Reunite(esteban, emilio)) -> therefore not Reunite(esteban, emilio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The sashenka is daunting. The sashenka laugh the hilton. The hilton is endodontic. The hilton laugh the sashenka. The hilton does not see the sashenka. The hilton nest the sashenka. The carmela is daunting. The carmela laugh the sashenka. The carmela assuage the sashenka. The carmela does not visit the sashenka. If something is dehydrated and it assuage the hilton then the hilton is dehydrated. If something nest the hilton then it does not see the carmela. If something laugh the sashenka then it nest the carmela. If something nest the carmela then the carmela does not visit the hilton. If something is daunting and it does not need the carmela then the carmela assuage the sashenka. If something is formalized and it does not visit the sashenka then the sashenka is endodontic. If something laugh the hilton and it does not visit the carmela then it is formalized. If something is endodontic then it is noncaloric. The carmela is not noncaloric.", "logic": "\nDaunting(sashenka)\nLaugh(sashenka, hilton)\nEndodontic(hilton)\nLaugh(hilton, sashenka)\nnot Assuage(hilton, sashenka)\nNest(hilton, sashenka)\nDaunting(carmela)\nLaugh(carmela, sashenka)\nAssuage(carmela, sashenka)\nnot Nest(carmela, sashenka)\nforall x (Dehydrated(x) and Assuage(x, hilton) -> Dehydrated(hilton))\nforall x (Nest(x, hilton) -> not Assuage(x, carmela))\nforall x (Laugh(x, sashenka) -> Nest(x, carmela))\nforall x (Nest(x, carmela) -> not Nest(carmela, hilton))\nforall x (Daunting(x) and not Laugh(x, carmela) -> Assuage(carmela, sashenka))\nforall x (Formalized(x) and not Nest(x, sashenka) -> Endodontic(sashenka))\nforall x (Laugh(x, hilton) and not Nest(x, carmela) -> Formalized(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\n\nnot Noncaloric(carmela)\n\nforall x (Endodontic(x) -> Noncaloric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The teodor is adjunctive. The teodor facsimile the misty. The misty is batwing. The misty facsimile the teodor. The misty does not see the teodor. The misty collimate the teodor. The levon is adjunctive. The levon facsimile the teodor. The levon station the teodor. The levon does not visit the teodor. If something is arabic and it station the misty then the misty is arabic. If something collimate the misty then it does not see the levon. If something facsimile the teodor then it collimate the levon. If something collimate the levon then the levon does not visit the misty. If something is adjunctive and it does not need the levon then the levon station the teodor. If something is hispid and it does not visit the teodor then the teodor is batwing. If something facsimile the misty and it does not visit the levon then it is hispid. If something is batwing then it is undigested. The teodor is batwing.", "logic": "\nAdjunctive(teodor)\nFacsimile(teodor, misty)\nBatwing(misty)\nFacsimile(misty, teodor)\nnot Station(misty, teodor)\nCollimate(misty, teodor)\nAdjunctive(levon)\nFacsimile(levon, teodor)\nStation(levon, teodor)\nnot Collimate(levon, teodor)\nforall x (Arabic(x) and Station(x, misty) -> Arabic(misty))\nforall x (Collimate(x, misty) -> not Station(x, levon))\nforall x (Facsimile(x, teodor) -> Collimate(x, levon))\nforall x (Collimate(x, levon) -> not Collimate(levon, misty))\nforall x (Adjunctive(x) and not Facsimile(x, levon) -> Station(levon, teodor))\nforall x (Hispid(x) and not Collimate(x, teodor) -> Batwing(teodor))\nforall x (Facsimile(x, misty) and not Collimate(x, levon) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Batwing(x) -> Undigested(x))\n\nBatwing(teodor)\n\nforall x (Hispid(x) and not Collimate(x, teodor) -> Batwing(teodor)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The wesley is soothing. The wesley unreel the katerina. The katerina is eucaryotic. The katerina unreel the wesley. The katerina does not see the wesley. The katerina append the wesley. The jade is soothing. The jade unreel the wesley. The jade mean the wesley. The jade does not visit the wesley. If something is hieratical and it mean the katerina then the katerina is hieratical. If something append the katerina then it does not see the jade. If something unreel the wesley then it append the jade. If something append the jade then the jade does not visit the katerina. If something is soothing and it does not need the jade then the jade mean the wesley. If something is clever and it does not visit the wesley then the wesley is eucaryotic. If something unreel the katerina and it does not visit the jade then it is clever. If something is eucaryotic then it is roast. The wesley does not visit the jade.", "logic": "\nSoothing(wesley)\nUnreel(wesley, katerina)\nEucaryotic(katerina)\nUnreel(katerina, wesley)\nnot Mean(katerina, wesley)\nAppend(katerina, wesley)\nSoothing(jade)\nUnreel(jade, wesley)\nMean(jade, wesley)\nnot Append(jade, wesley)\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Mean(x, katerina) -> Hieratical(katerina))\nforall x (Append(x, katerina) -> not Mean(x, jade))\nforall x (Unreel(x, wesley) -> Append(x, jade))\nforall x (Append(x, jade) -> not Append(jade, katerina))\nforall x (Soothing(x) and not Unreel(x, jade) -> Mean(jade, wesley))\nforall x (Clever(x) and not Append(x, wesley) -> Eucaryotic(wesley))\nforall x (Unreel(x, katerina) and not Append(x, jade) -> Clever(x))\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Roast(x))\n\nnot Append(wesley, jade)\n\nforall x (Unreel(x, wesley) -> Append(x, jade)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The thacher is saccadic. The thacher prolong the rosalia. The rosalia is lubricious. The rosalia prolong the thacher. The rosalia does not see the thacher. The rosalia agenize the thacher. The dov is saccadic. The dov prolong the thacher. The dov misdate the thacher. The dov does not visit the thacher. If something is natural and it misdate the rosalia then the rosalia is natural. If something agenize the rosalia then it does not see the dov. If something prolong the thacher then it agenize the dov. If something agenize the dov then the dov does not visit the rosalia. If something is saccadic and it does not need the dov then the dov misdate the thacher. If something is boxed and it does not visit the thacher then the thacher is lubricious. If something prolong the rosalia and it does not visit the dov then it is boxed. If something is lubricious then it is memberless. The thacher misdate the thacher.", "logic": "\nSaccadic(thacher)\nProlong(thacher, rosalia)\nLubricious(rosalia)\nProlong(rosalia, thacher)\nnot Misdate(rosalia, thacher)\nAgenize(rosalia, thacher)\nSaccadic(dov)\nProlong(dov, thacher)\nMisdate(dov, thacher)\nnot Agenize(dov, thacher)\nforall x (Natural(x) and Misdate(x, rosalia) -> Natural(rosalia))\nforall x (Agenize(x, rosalia) -> not Misdate(x, dov))\nforall x (Prolong(x, thacher) -> Agenize(x, dov))\nforall x (Agenize(x, dov) -> not Agenize(dov, rosalia))\nforall x (Saccadic(x) and not Prolong(x, dov) -> Misdate(dov, thacher))\nforall x (Boxed(x) and not Agenize(x, thacher) -> Lubricious(thacher))\nforall x (Prolong(x, rosalia) and not Agenize(x, dov) -> Boxed(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) -> Memberless(x))\n\nMisdate(thacher, thacher)\n\nMisdate(thacher, thacher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The wynnie is pseudo. The wynnie victimize the davey. The davey is pastelike. The davey victimize the wynnie. The davey does not see the wynnie. The davey date the wynnie. The harlie is pseudo. The harlie victimize the wynnie. The harlie ideate the wynnie. The harlie does not visit the wynnie. If something is mucous and it ideate the davey then the davey is mucous. If something date the davey then it does not see the harlie. If something victimize the wynnie then it date the harlie. If something date the harlie then the harlie does not visit the davey. If something is pseudo and it does not need the harlie then the harlie ideate the wynnie. If something is runic and it does not visit the wynnie then the wynnie is pastelike. If something victimize the davey and it does not visit the harlie then it is runic. If something is pastelike then it is rugose. The davey is not pseudo.", "logic": "\nPseudo(wynnie)\nVictimize(wynnie, davey)\nPastelike(davey)\nVictimize(davey, wynnie)\nnot Ideate(davey, wynnie)\nDate(davey, wynnie)\nPseudo(harlie)\nVictimize(harlie, wynnie)\nIdeate(harlie, wynnie)\nnot Date(harlie, wynnie)\nforall x (Mucous(x) and Ideate(x, davey) -> Mucous(davey))\nforall x (Date(x, davey) -> not Ideate(x, harlie))\nforall x (Victimize(x, wynnie) -> Date(x, harlie))\nforall x (Date(x, harlie) -> not Date(harlie, davey))\nforall x (Pseudo(x) and not Victimize(x, harlie) -> Ideate(harlie, wynnie))\nforall x (Runic(x) and not Date(x, wynnie) -> Pastelike(wynnie))\nforall x (Victimize(x, davey) and not Date(x, harlie) -> Runic(x))\nforall x (Pastelike(x) -> Rugose(x))\n\nnot Pseudo(davey)\n\nnot Pseudo(davey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The myrtia is polar. The myrtia synthesize the chastity. The chastity is newsy. The chastity synthesize the myrtia. The chastity does not see the myrtia. The chastity refract the myrtia. The lynea is polar. The lynea synthesize the myrtia. The lynea dream the myrtia. The lynea does not visit the myrtia. If something is prussian and it dream the chastity then the chastity is prussian. If something refract the chastity then it does not see the lynea. If something synthesize the myrtia then it refract the lynea. If something refract the lynea then the lynea does not visit the chastity. If something is polar and it does not need the lynea then the lynea dream the myrtia. If something is peculiar and it does not visit the myrtia then the myrtia is newsy. If something synthesize the chastity and it does not visit the lynea then it is peculiar. If something is newsy then it is hilar. The lynea synthesize the lynea.", "logic": "\nPolar(myrtia)\nSynthesize(myrtia, chastity)\nNewsy(chastity)\nSynthesize(chastity, myrtia)\nnot Dream(chastity, myrtia)\nRefract(chastity, myrtia)\nPolar(lynea)\nSynthesize(lynea, myrtia)\nDream(lynea, myrtia)\nnot Refract(lynea, myrtia)\nforall x (Prussian(x) and Dream(x, chastity) -> Prussian(chastity))\nforall x (Refract(x, chastity) -> not Dream(x, lynea))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, myrtia) -> Refract(x, lynea))\nforall x (Refract(x, lynea) -> not Refract(lynea, chastity))\nforall x (Polar(x) and not Synthesize(x, lynea) -> Dream(lynea, myrtia))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) and not Refract(x, myrtia) -> Newsy(myrtia))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, chastity) and not Refract(x, lynea) -> Peculiar(x))\nforall x (Newsy(x) -> Hilar(x))\n\nSynthesize(lynea, lynea)\n\nSynthesize(lynea, lynea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1814"} {"premises": "The elizabet renege the giana. The hildy is oval. The ethelbert renege the elizabet. The giana renege the elizabet. If something cushion the elizabet then the elizabet is oval. If something chorus the ethelbert and it renege the ethelbert then the ethelbert is leaflike. If something renege the giana then it cushion the elizabet. The ethelbert renege the elizabet.", "logic": "\nRenege(elizabet, giana)\nOval(hildy)\nRenege(ethelbert, elizabet)\nRenege(giana, elizabet)\nforall x (Cushion(x, elizabet) -> Oval(elizabet))\nforall x (Chorus(x, ethelbert) and Renege(x, ethelbert) -> Leaflike(ethelbert))\nforall x (Renege(x, giana) -> Cushion(x, elizabet))\n\nRenege(ethelbert, elizabet)\n\ntherefore Renege(ethelbert, elizabet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The leah assimilate the pauletta. The idelle is relational. The mei assimilate the leah. The pauletta assimilate the leah. If something resect the leah then the leah is relational. If something crenel the mei and it assimilate the mei then the mei is combinable. If something assimilate the pauletta then it resect the leah. The mei does not like the leah.", "logic": "\nAssimilate(leah, pauletta)\nRelational(idelle)\nAssimilate(mei, leah)\nAssimilate(pauletta, leah)\nforall x (Resect(x, leah) -> Relational(leah))\nforall x (Crenel(x, mei) and Assimilate(x, mei) -> Combinable(mei))\nforall x (Assimilate(x, pauletta) -> Resect(x, leah))\n\nnot Assimilate(mei, leah)\n\ntherefore Assimilate(mei, leah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The malynda feminize the marylee. The nico is modifiable. The elwira feminize the malynda. The marylee feminize the malynda. If something germinate the malynda then the malynda is modifiable. If something display the elwira and it feminize the elwira then the elwira is drastic. If something feminize the marylee then it germinate the malynda. The malynda germinate the malynda.", "logic": "\nFeminize(malynda, marylee)\nModifiable(nico)\nFeminize(elwira, malynda)\nFeminize(marylee, malynda)\nforall x (Germinate(x, malynda) -> Modifiable(malynda))\nforall x (Display(x, elwira) and Feminize(x, elwira) -> Drastic(elwira))\nforall x (Feminize(x, marylee) -> Germinate(x, malynda))\n\nGerminate(malynda, malynda)\n\nFeminize(malynda, marylee) and forall x (Feminize(x, marylee) -> Germinate(x, malynda)) -> therefore Germinate(malynda, malynda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The catha turf the kalila. The kathrine is sulfuric. The siana turf the catha. The kalila turf the catha. If something ascertain the catha then the catha is sulfuric. If something exhort the siana and it turf the siana then the siana is grand. If something turf the kalila then it ascertain the catha. The catha does not chase the catha.", "logic": "\nTurf(catha, kalila)\nSulfuric(kathrine)\nTurf(siana, catha)\nTurf(kalila, catha)\nforall x (Ascertain(x, catha) -> Sulfuric(catha))\nforall x (Exhort(x, siana) and Turf(x, siana) -> Grand(siana))\nforall x (Turf(x, kalila) -> Ascertain(x, catha))\n\nnot Ascertain(catha, catha)\n\nTurf(catha, kalila) and forall x (Turf(x, kalila) -> Ascertain(x, catha)) -> therefore Ascertain(catha, catha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The amory fall the riki. The tudor is mystified. The garey fall the amory. The riki fall the amory. If something decolonize the amory then the amory is mystified. If something chap the garey and it fall the garey then the garey is topologic. If something fall the riki then it decolonize the amory. The amory is mystified.", "logic": "\nFall(amory, riki)\nMystified(tudor)\nFall(garey, amory)\nFall(riki, amory)\nforall x (Decolonize(x, amory) -> Mystified(amory))\nforall x (Chap(x, garey) and Fall(x, garey) -> Topologic(garey))\nforall x (Fall(x, riki) -> Decolonize(x, amory))\n\nMystified(amory)\n\nFall(amory, riki) and forall x (Fall(x, riki) -> Decolonize(x, amory)) -> therefore Decolonize(amory, amory) Decolonize(amory, amory) and forall x (Decolonize(x, amory) -> Mystified(amory)) -> therefore Mystified(amory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The jeniece snuggle the celine. The avie is stroppy. The dyann snuggle the jeniece. The celine snuggle the jeniece. If something perish the jeniece then the jeniece is stroppy. If something decouple the dyann and it snuggle the dyann then the dyann is furtive. If something snuggle the celine then it perish the jeniece. The jeniece is not stroppy.", "logic": "\nSnuggle(jeniece, celine)\nStroppy(avie)\nSnuggle(dyann, jeniece)\nSnuggle(celine, jeniece)\nforall x (Perish(x, jeniece) -> Stroppy(jeniece))\nforall x (Decouple(x, dyann) and Snuggle(x, dyann) -> Furtive(dyann))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, celine) -> Perish(x, jeniece))\n\nnot Stroppy(jeniece)\n\nSnuggle(jeniece, celine) and forall x (Snuggle(x, celine) -> Perish(x, jeniece)) -> therefore Perish(jeniece, jeniece) Perish(jeniece, jeniece) and forall x (Perish(x, jeniece) -> Stroppy(jeniece)) -> therefore Stroppy(jeniece)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The zak flatten the ede. The mechelle is crinoid. The johann flatten the zak. The ede flatten the zak. If something scrutinise the zak then the zak is crinoid. If something ready the johann and it flatten the johann then the johann is greenish. If something flatten the ede then it scrutinise the zak. The johann is not greenish.", "logic": "\nFlatten(zak, ede)\nCrinoid(mechelle)\nFlatten(johann, zak)\nFlatten(ede, zak)\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, zak) -> Crinoid(zak))\nforall x (Ready(x, johann) and Flatten(x, johann) -> Greenish(johann))\nforall x (Flatten(x, ede) -> Scrutinise(x, zak))\n\nnot Greenish(johann)\n\nforall x (Ready(x, johann) and Flatten(x, johann) -> Greenish(johann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The mehetabel wrick the marybeth. The yolanthe is increasing. The levi wrick the mehetabel. The marybeth wrick the mehetabel. If something habit the mehetabel then the mehetabel is increasing. If something paste the levi and it wrick the levi then the levi is enolic. If something wrick the marybeth then it habit the mehetabel. The yolanthe habit the mehetabel.", "logic": "\nWrick(mehetabel, marybeth)\nIncreasing(yolanthe)\nWrick(levi, mehetabel)\nWrick(marybeth, mehetabel)\nforall x (Habit(x, mehetabel) -> Increasing(mehetabel))\nforall x (Paste(x, levi) and Wrick(x, levi) -> Enolic(levi))\nforall x (Wrick(x, marybeth) -> Habit(x, mehetabel))\n\nHabit(yolanthe, mehetabel)\n\nforall x (Wrick(x, marybeth) -> Habit(x, mehetabel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The thorvald protrude the hadrian. The austina is senescent. The mendie protrude the thorvald. The hadrian protrude the thorvald. If something dope the thorvald then the thorvald is senescent. If something knight the mendie and it protrude the mendie then the mendie is assuring. If something protrude the hadrian then it dope the thorvald. The mendie does not chase the thorvald.", "logic": "\nProtrude(thorvald, hadrian)\nSenescent(austina)\nProtrude(mendie, thorvald)\nProtrude(hadrian, thorvald)\nforall x (Dope(x, thorvald) -> Senescent(thorvald))\nforall x (Knight(x, mendie) and Protrude(x, mendie) -> Assuring(mendie))\nforall x (Protrude(x, hadrian) -> Dope(x, thorvald))\n\nnot Dope(mendie, thorvald)\n\nforall x (Protrude(x, hadrian) -> Dope(x, thorvald)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The tiffy bifurcate the caitrin. The shumeet is high. The merrily bifurcate the tiffy. The caitrin bifurcate the tiffy. If something scar the tiffy then the tiffy is high. If something fast the merrily and it bifurcate the merrily then the merrily is mortified. If something bifurcate the caitrin then it scar the tiffy. The shumeet is red.", "logic": "\nBifurcate(tiffy, caitrin)\nHigh(shumeet)\nBifurcate(merrily, tiffy)\nBifurcate(caitrin, tiffy)\nforall x (Scar(x, tiffy) -> High(tiffy))\nforall x (Fast(x, merrily) and Bifurcate(x, merrily) -> Mortified(merrily))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, caitrin) -> Scar(x, tiffy))\n\nRed(shumeet)\n\nRed(shumeet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The xavier castigate the rogers. The etta is numeral. The emmye castigate the xavier. The rogers castigate the xavier. If something polychrome the xavier then the xavier is numeral. If something feed the emmye and it castigate the emmye then the emmye is lengthened. If something castigate the rogers then it polychrome the xavier. The etta does not like the rogers.", "logic": "\nCastigate(xavier, rogers)\nNumeral(etta)\nCastigate(emmye, xavier)\nCastigate(rogers, xavier)\nforall x (Polychrome(x, xavier) -> Numeral(xavier))\nforall x (Feed(x, emmye) and Castigate(x, emmye) -> Lengthened(emmye))\nforall x (Castigate(x, rogers) -> Polychrome(x, xavier))\n\nnot Castigate(etta, rogers)\n\nnot Castigate(etta, rogers) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "The cyrillus accoutre the cooper. The tuck is separated. The george accoutre the cyrillus. The cooper accoutre the cyrillus. If something disconcert the cyrillus then the cyrillus is separated. If something spill the george and it accoutre the george then the george is fitting. If something accoutre the cooper then it disconcert the cyrillus. The cooper accoutre the cooper.", "logic": "\nAccoutre(cyrillus, cooper)\nSeparated(tuck)\nAccoutre(george, cyrillus)\nAccoutre(cooper, cyrillus)\nforall x (Disconcert(x, cyrillus) -> Separated(cyrillus))\nforall x (Spill(x, george) and Accoutre(x, george) -> Fitting(george))\nforall x (Accoutre(x, cooper) -> Disconcert(x, cyrillus))\n\nAccoutre(cooper, cooper)\n\nAccoutre(cooper, cooper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-505"} {"premises": "Shelbi is younger. Bianca is nonrigid. Mayor is reversible. If someone is reversible and younger then they are somalian. All younger people are nonrigid. Cold people are not swooning. Mayor is reversible.", "logic": "\nYounger(shelbi)\nNonrigid(bianca)\nReversible(mayor)\nforall x (Reversible(x) and Younger(x) -> Somalian(x))\nforall x (Younger(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) -> not Swooning(x))\n\nReversible(mayor)\n\ntherefore Reversible(mayor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Eben is kashmiri. Deane is hindermost. Boyce is spermatic. If someone is spermatic and kashmiri then they are unsatiable. All kashmiri people are hindermost. Cold people are not emphasised. Boyce is not spermatic.", "logic": "\nKashmiri(eben)\nHindermost(deane)\nSpermatic(boyce)\nforall x (Spermatic(x) and Kashmiri(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) -> Hindermost(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> not Emphasised(x))\n\nnot Spermatic(boyce)\n\ntherefore Spermatic(boyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Bari is unexpended. Rodolph is adnate. Dehlia is devalued. If someone is devalued and unexpended then they are antlered. All unexpended people are adnate. Cold people are not fabled. Rodolph is not fabled.", "logic": "\nUnexpended(bari)\nAdnate(rodolph)\nDevalued(dehlia)\nforall x (Devalued(x) and Unexpended(x) -> Antlered(x))\nforall x (Unexpended(x) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Adnate(x) -> not Fabled(x))\n\nnot Fabled(rodolph)\n\nAdnate(rodolph) and forall x (Adnate(x) -> not Fabled(x)) -> therefore not Fabled(rodolph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Lolande is arty. Deni is glib. Karissa is tied. If someone is tied and arty then they are voluble. All arty people are glib. Cold people are not columnar. Lolande is not glib.", "logic": "\nArty(lolande)\nGlib(deni)\nTied(karissa)\nforall x (Tied(x) and Arty(x) -> Voluble(x))\nforall x (Arty(x) -> Glib(x))\nforall x (Glib(x) -> not Columnar(x))\n\nnot Glib(lolande)\n\nArty(lolande) and forall x (Arty(x) -> Glib(x)) -> therefore Glib(lolande)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Dugan is tricky. Edin is withdrawn. Lenna is planless. If someone is planless and tricky then they are inept. All tricky people are withdrawn. Cold people are not unhelpful. Dugan is not unhelpful.", "logic": "\nTricky(dugan)\nWithdrawn(edin)\nPlanless(lenna)\nforall x (Planless(x) and Tricky(x) -> Inept(x))\nforall x (Tricky(x) -> Withdrawn(x))\nforall x (Withdrawn(x) -> not Unhelpful(x))\n\nnot Unhelpful(dugan)\n\nTricky(dugan) and forall x (Tricky(x) -> Withdrawn(x)) -> therefore Withdrawn(dugan) Withdrawn(dugan) and forall x (Withdrawn(x) -> not Unhelpful(x)) -> therefore not Unhelpful(dugan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Bee is leery. Marin is impugnable. Haily is chelated. If someone is chelated and leery then they are eased. All leery people are impugnable. Cold people are not primed. Bee is primed.", "logic": "\nLeery(bee)\nImpugnable(marin)\nChelated(haily)\nforall x (Chelated(x) and Leery(x) -> Eased(x))\nforall x (Leery(x) -> Impugnable(x))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) -> not Primed(x))\n\nPrimed(bee)\n\nLeery(bee) and forall x (Leery(x) -> Impugnable(x)) -> therefore Impugnable(bee) Impugnable(bee) and forall x (Impugnable(x) -> not Primed(x)) -> therefore not Primed(bee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Virgilio is slovakian. Wait is gestural. Andre is amendatory. If someone is amendatory and slovakian then they are gerundial. All slovakian people are gestural. Cold people are not correlated. Andre is not gerundial.", "logic": "\nSlovakian(virgilio)\nGestural(wait)\nAmendatory(andre)\nforall x (Amendatory(x) and Slovakian(x) -> Gerundial(x))\nforall x (Slovakian(x) -> Gestural(x))\nforall x (Gestural(x) -> not Correlated(x))\n\nnot Gerundial(andre)\n\nforall x (Amendatory(x) and Slovakian(x) -> Gerundial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Kellie is phonemic. Reinhold is fledgeling. Ibbie is hulky. If someone is hulky and phonemic then they are awaited. All phonemic people are fledgeling. Cold people are not wretched. Reinhold is awaited.", "logic": "\nPhonemic(kellie)\nFledgeling(reinhold)\nHulky(ibbie)\nforall x (Hulky(x) and Phonemic(x) -> Awaited(x))\nforall x (Phonemic(x) -> Fledgeling(x))\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) -> not Wretched(x))\n\nAwaited(reinhold)\n\nforall x (Hulky(x) and Phonemic(x) -> Awaited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Diamond is lethargic. Roxine is subaquatic. Kayley is neuronal. If someone is neuronal and lethargic then they are leal. All lethargic people are subaquatic. Cold people are not prodromic. Diamond is not leal.", "logic": "\nLethargic(diamond)\nSubaquatic(roxine)\nNeuronal(kayley)\nforall x (Neuronal(x) and Lethargic(x) -> Leal(x))\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> not Prodromic(x))\n\nnot Leal(diamond)\n\nforall x (Neuronal(x) and Lethargic(x) -> Leal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Damara is serried. Winslow is bolivian. Zorana is xlviii. If someone is xlviii and serried then they are selected. All serried people are bolivian. Cold people are not cryonic. Zorana is cryonic.", "logic": "\nSerried(damara)\nBolivian(winslow)\nXlviii(zorana)\nforall x (Xlviii(x) and Serried(x) -> Selected(x))\nforall x (Serried(x) -> Bolivian(x))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> not Cryonic(x))\n\nCryonic(zorana)\n\nCryonic(zorana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Rani is mighty. Orin is supervised. Lesley is acinous. If someone is acinous and mighty then they are fashioned. All mighty people are supervised. Cold people are not ruddy. Orin is not round.", "logic": "\nMighty(rani)\nSupervised(orin)\nAcinous(lesley)\nforall x (Acinous(x) and Mighty(x) -> Fashioned(x))\nforall x (Mighty(x) -> Supervised(x))\nforall x (Supervised(x) -> not Ruddy(x))\n\nnot Round(orin)\n\nnot Round(orin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "Englebart is astounded. Lisandra is rubberlike. Lennie is athenian. If someone is athenian and astounded then they are bumbling. All astounded people are rubberlike. Cold people are not lustrous. Lisandra is astounded.", "logic": "\nAstounded(englebart)\nRubberlike(lisandra)\nAthenian(lennie)\nforall x (Athenian(x) and Astounded(x) -> Bumbling(x))\nforall x (Astounded(x) -> Rubberlike(x))\nforall x (Rubberlike(x) -> not Lustrous(x))\n\nAstounded(lisandra)\n\nAstounded(lisandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-254"} {"premises": "The pincas subserve the dana. The pincas toady the dana. The isidora nictate the persis. The isidora nictate the dana. The persis is wondrous. The persis subserve the dana. The dana does not visit the persis. If someone nictate the pincas and they are not camp then the pincas subserve the isidora. If the pincas is wondrous then the pincas is schoolwide. If someone subserve the persis and they are not wondrous then the persis subserve the isidora. If someone toady the persis and the persis does not need the pincas then the pincas toady the persis. If someone nictate the persis then they need the isidora. If someone subserve the dana then they need the persis. The persis subserve the dana.", "logic": "\nSubserve(pincas, dana)\nToady(pincas, dana)\nNictate(isidora, persis)\nNictate(isidora, dana)\nWondrous(persis)\nSubserve(persis, dana)\nnot Toady(dana, persis)\nforall x (Nictate(x, pincas) and not Camp(x) -> Subserve(pincas, isidora))\nWondrous(pincas) -> Schoolwide(pincas)\nforall x (Subserve(x, persis) and not Wondrous(x) -> Subserve(persis, isidora))\nforall x (Toady(x, persis) and not Nictate(persis, pincas) -> Toady(pincas, persis))\nforall x (Nictate(x, persis) -> Nictate(x, isidora))\nforall x (Subserve(x, dana) -> Nictate(x, persis))\n\nSubserve(persis, dana)\n\ntherefore Subserve(persis, dana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The irving unravel the karlene. The irving guess the karlene. The freemon contuse the thadeus. The freemon contuse the karlene. The thadeus is perishable. The thadeus unravel the karlene. The karlene does not visit the thadeus. If someone contuse the irving and they are not papillary then the irving unravel the freemon. If the irving is perishable then the irving is bicolor. If someone unravel the thadeus and they are not perishable then the thadeus unravel the freemon. If someone guess the thadeus and the thadeus does not need the irving then the irving guess the thadeus. If someone contuse the thadeus then they need the freemon. If someone unravel the karlene then they need the thadeus. The thadeus does not see the karlene.", "logic": "\nUnravel(irving, karlene)\nGuess(irving, karlene)\nContuse(freemon, thadeus)\nContuse(freemon, karlene)\nPerishable(thadeus)\nUnravel(thadeus, karlene)\nnot Guess(karlene, thadeus)\nforall x (Contuse(x, irving) and not Papillary(x) -> Unravel(irving, freemon))\nPerishable(irving) -> Bicolor(irving)\nforall x (Unravel(x, thadeus) and not Perishable(x) -> Unravel(thadeus, freemon))\nforall x (Guess(x, thadeus) and not Contuse(thadeus, irving) -> Guess(irving, thadeus))\nforall x (Contuse(x, thadeus) -> Contuse(x, freemon))\nforall x (Unravel(x, karlene) -> Contuse(x, thadeus))\n\nnot Unravel(thadeus, karlene)\n\ntherefore Unravel(thadeus, karlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The camila cakewalk the ardelis. The camila oversupply the ardelis. The jereme nasalize the northrup. The jereme nasalize the ardelis. The northrup is flickering. The northrup cakewalk the ardelis. The ardelis does not visit the northrup. If someone nasalize the camila and they are not optative then the camila cakewalk the jereme. If the camila is flickering then the camila is mortal. If someone cakewalk the northrup and they are not flickering then the northrup cakewalk the jereme. If someone oversupply the northrup and the northrup does not need the camila then the camila oversupply the northrup. If someone nasalize the northrup then they need the jereme. If someone cakewalk the ardelis then they need the northrup. The jereme nasalize the jereme.", "logic": "\nCakewalk(camila, ardelis)\nOversupply(camila, ardelis)\nNasalize(jereme, northrup)\nNasalize(jereme, ardelis)\nFlickering(northrup)\nCakewalk(northrup, ardelis)\nnot Oversupply(ardelis, northrup)\nforall x (Nasalize(x, camila) and not Optative(x) -> Cakewalk(camila, jereme))\nFlickering(camila) -> Mortal(camila)\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, northrup) and not Flickering(x) -> Cakewalk(northrup, jereme))\nforall x (Oversupply(x, northrup) and not Nasalize(northrup, camila) -> Oversupply(camila, northrup))\nforall x (Nasalize(x, northrup) -> Nasalize(x, jereme))\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, ardelis) -> Nasalize(x, northrup))\n\nNasalize(jereme, jereme)\n\nNasalize(jereme, northrup) and forall x (Nasalize(x, northrup) -> Nasalize(x, jereme)) -> therefore Nasalize(jereme, jereme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The niels disenchant the garrot. The niels purify the garrot. The daren unsettle the luigi. The daren unsettle the garrot. The luigi is sneaky. The luigi disenchant the garrot. The garrot does not visit the luigi. If someone unsettle the niels and they are not jingly then the niels disenchant the daren. If the niels is sneaky then the niels is documental. If someone disenchant the luigi and they are not sneaky then the luigi disenchant the daren. If someone purify the luigi and the luigi does not need the niels then the niels purify the luigi. If someone unsettle the luigi then they need the daren. If someone disenchant the garrot then they need the luigi. The luigi does not need the luigi.", "logic": "\nDisenchant(niels, garrot)\nPurify(niels, garrot)\nUnsettle(daren, luigi)\nUnsettle(daren, garrot)\nSneaky(luigi)\nDisenchant(luigi, garrot)\nnot Purify(garrot, luigi)\nforall x (Unsettle(x, niels) and not Jingly(x) -> Disenchant(niels, daren))\nSneaky(niels) -> Documental(niels)\nforall x (Disenchant(x, luigi) and not Sneaky(x) -> Disenchant(luigi, daren))\nforall x (Purify(x, luigi) and not Unsettle(luigi, niels) -> Purify(niels, luigi))\nforall x (Unsettle(x, luigi) -> Unsettle(x, daren))\nforall x (Disenchant(x, garrot) -> Unsettle(x, luigi))\n\nnot Unsettle(luigi, luigi)\n\nDisenchant(luigi, garrot) and forall x (Disenchant(x, garrot) -> Unsettle(x, luigi)) -> therefore Unsettle(luigi, luigi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The manish saddle the davina. The manish avoid the davina. The stevena devolve the kimball. The stevena devolve the davina. The kimball is ascendent. The kimball saddle the davina. The davina does not visit the kimball. If someone devolve the manish and they are not adhesive then the manish saddle the stevena. If the manish is ascendent then the manish is ravaging. If someone saddle the kimball and they are not ascendent then the kimball saddle the stevena. If someone avoid the kimball and the kimball does not need the manish then the manish avoid the kimball. If someone devolve the kimball then they need the stevena. If someone saddle the davina then they need the kimball. The kimball devolve the stevena.", "logic": "\nSaddle(manish, davina)\nAvoid(manish, davina)\nDevolve(stevena, kimball)\nDevolve(stevena, davina)\nAscendent(kimball)\nSaddle(kimball, davina)\nnot Avoid(davina, kimball)\nforall x (Devolve(x, manish) and not Adhesive(x) -> Saddle(manish, stevena))\nAscendent(manish) -> Ravaging(manish)\nforall x (Saddle(x, kimball) and not Ascendent(x) -> Saddle(kimball, stevena))\nforall x (Avoid(x, kimball) and not Devolve(kimball, manish) -> Avoid(manish, kimball))\nforall x (Devolve(x, kimball) -> Devolve(x, stevena))\nforall x (Saddle(x, davina) -> Devolve(x, kimball))\n\nDevolve(kimball, stevena)\n\nSaddle(kimball, davina) and forall x (Saddle(x, davina) -> Devolve(x, kimball)) -> therefore Devolve(kimball, kimball) Devolve(kimball, kimball) and forall x (Devolve(x, kimball) -> Devolve(x, stevena)) -> therefore Devolve(kimball, stevena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The kit stagger the lorain. The kit peck the lorain. The arlina hobble the malina. The arlina hobble the lorain. The malina is smothering. The malina stagger the lorain. The lorain does not visit the malina. If someone hobble the kit and they are not belgian then the kit stagger the arlina. If the kit is smothering then the kit is billionth. If someone stagger the malina and they are not smothering then the malina stagger the arlina. If someone peck the malina and the malina does not need the kit then the kit peck the malina. If someone hobble the malina then they need the arlina. If someone stagger the lorain then they need the malina. The malina does not need the arlina.", "logic": "\nStagger(kit, lorain)\nPeck(kit, lorain)\nHobble(arlina, malina)\nHobble(arlina, lorain)\nSmothering(malina)\nStagger(malina, lorain)\nnot Peck(lorain, malina)\nforall x (Hobble(x, kit) and not Belgian(x) -> Stagger(kit, arlina))\nSmothering(kit) -> Billionth(kit)\nforall x (Stagger(x, malina) and not Smothering(x) -> Stagger(malina, arlina))\nforall x (Peck(x, malina) and not Hobble(malina, kit) -> Peck(kit, malina))\nforall x (Hobble(x, malina) -> Hobble(x, arlina))\nforall x (Stagger(x, lorain) -> Hobble(x, malina))\n\nnot Hobble(malina, arlina)\n\nStagger(malina, lorain) and forall x (Stagger(x, lorain) -> Hobble(x, malina)) -> therefore Hobble(malina, malina) Hobble(malina, malina) and forall x (Hobble(x, malina) -> Hobble(x, arlina)) -> therefore Hobble(malina, arlina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The sheppard demonize the isidore. The sheppard abandon the isidore. The pavel ramble the elane. The pavel ramble the isidore. The elane is tsaristic. The elane demonize the isidore. The isidore does not visit the elane. If someone ramble the sheppard and they are not derived then the sheppard demonize the pavel. If the sheppard is tsaristic then the sheppard is pleasant. If someone demonize the elane and they are not tsaristic then the elane demonize the pavel. If someone abandon the elane and the elane does not need the sheppard then the sheppard abandon the elane. If someone ramble the elane then they need the pavel. If someone demonize the isidore then they need the elane. The sheppard is not pleasant.", "logic": "\nDemonize(sheppard, isidore)\nAbandon(sheppard, isidore)\nRamble(pavel, elane)\nRamble(pavel, isidore)\nTsaristic(elane)\nDemonize(elane, isidore)\nnot Abandon(isidore, elane)\nforall x (Ramble(x, sheppard) and not Derived(x) -> Demonize(sheppard, pavel))\nTsaristic(sheppard) -> Pleasant(sheppard)\nforall x (Demonize(x, elane) and not Tsaristic(x) -> Demonize(elane, pavel))\nforall x (Abandon(x, elane) and not Ramble(elane, sheppard) -> Abandon(sheppard, elane))\nforall x (Ramble(x, elane) -> Ramble(x, pavel))\nforall x (Demonize(x, isidore) -> Ramble(x, elane))\n\nnot Pleasant(sheppard)\n\nTsaristic(sheppard) -> Pleasant(sheppard) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The lynnette outrank the jessamyn. The lynnette oxidate the jessamyn. The stefa blossom the lamar. The stefa blossom the jessamyn. The lamar is electronic. The lamar outrank the jessamyn. The jessamyn does not visit the lamar. If someone blossom the lynnette and they are not miserly then the lynnette outrank the stefa. If the lynnette is electronic then the lynnette is noncyclic. If someone outrank the lamar and they are not electronic then the lamar outrank the stefa. If someone oxidate the lamar and the lamar does not need the lynnette then the lynnette oxidate the lamar. If someone blossom the lamar then they need the stefa. If someone outrank the jessamyn then they need the lamar. The lynnette oxidate the lamar.", "logic": "\nOutrank(lynnette, jessamyn)\nOxidate(lynnette, jessamyn)\nBlossom(stefa, lamar)\nBlossom(stefa, jessamyn)\nElectronic(lamar)\nOutrank(lamar, jessamyn)\nnot Oxidate(jessamyn, lamar)\nforall x (Blossom(x, lynnette) and not Miserly(x) -> Outrank(lynnette, stefa))\nElectronic(lynnette) -> Noncyclic(lynnette)\nforall x (Outrank(x, lamar) and not Electronic(x) -> Outrank(lamar, stefa))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, lamar) and not Blossom(lamar, lynnette) -> Oxidate(lynnette, lamar))\nforall x (Blossom(x, lamar) -> Blossom(x, stefa))\nforall x (Outrank(x, jessamyn) -> Blossom(x, lamar))\n\nOxidate(lynnette, lamar)\n\nforall x (Oxidate(x, lamar) and not Blossom(lamar, lynnette) -> Oxidate(lynnette, lamar)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The sharai vest the meir. The sharai distemper the meir. The corwin saturate the gerry. The corwin saturate the meir. The gerry is absolutist. The gerry vest the meir. The meir does not visit the gerry. If someone saturate the sharai and they are not urogenital then the sharai vest the corwin. If the sharai is absolutist then the sharai is flagrant. If someone vest the gerry and they are not absolutist then the gerry vest the corwin. If someone distemper the gerry and the gerry does not need the sharai then the sharai distemper the gerry. If someone saturate the gerry then they need the corwin. If someone vest the meir then they need the gerry. The meir does not need the corwin.", "logic": "\nVest(sharai, meir)\nDistemper(sharai, meir)\nSaturate(corwin, gerry)\nSaturate(corwin, meir)\nAbsolutist(gerry)\nVest(gerry, meir)\nnot Distemper(meir, gerry)\nforall x (Saturate(x, sharai) and not Urogenital(x) -> Vest(sharai, corwin))\nAbsolutist(sharai) -> Flagrant(sharai)\nforall x (Vest(x, gerry) and not Absolutist(x) -> Vest(gerry, corwin))\nforall x (Distemper(x, gerry) and not Saturate(gerry, sharai) -> Distemper(sharai, gerry))\nforall x (Saturate(x, gerry) -> Saturate(x, corwin))\nforall x (Vest(x, meir) -> Saturate(x, gerry))\n\nnot Saturate(meir, corwin)\n\nforall x (Saturate(x, gerry) -> Saturate(x, corwin)) <- forall x (Vest(x, meir) -> Saturate(x, gerry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The kalvin outpoint the pincus. The kalvin menace the pincus. The katrine suffuse the schuyler. The katrine suffuse the pincus. The schuyler is nestled. The schuyler outpoint the pincus. The pincus does not visit the schuyler. If someone suffuse the kalvin and they are not scorching then the kalvin outpoint the katrine. If the kalvin is nestled then the kalvin is secondary. If someone outpoint the schuyler and they are not nestled then the schuyler outpoint the katrine. If someone menace the schuyler and the schuyler does not need the kalvin then the kalvin menace the schuyler. If someone suffuse the schuyler then they need the katrine. If someone outpoint the pincus then they need the schuyler. The schuyler is kind.", "logic": "\nOutpoint(kalvin, pincus)\nMenace(kalvin, pincus)\nSuffuse(katrine, schuyler)\nSuffuse(katrine, pincus)\nNestled(schuyler)\nOutpoint(schuyler, pincus)\nnot Menace(pincus, schuyler)\nforall x (Suffuse(x, kalvin) and not Scorching(x) -> Outpoint(kalvin, katrine))\nNestled(kalvin) -> Secondary(kalvin)\nforall x (Outpoint(x, schuyler) and not Nestled(x) -> Outpoint(schuyler, katrine))\nforall x (Menace(x, schuyler) and not Suffuse(schuyler, kalvin) -> Menace(kalvin, schuyler))\nforall x (Suffuse(x, schuyler) -> Suffuse(x, katrine))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, pincus) -> Suffuse(x, schuyler))\n\nKind(schuyler)\n\nKind(schuyler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The krystle hydrolyse the rochette. The krystle action the rochette. The valry tenderise the ishmael. The valry tenderise the rochette. The ishmael is improved. The ishmael hydrolyse the rochette. The rochette does not visit the ishmael. If someone tenderise the krystle and they are not apiculate then the krystle hydrolyse the valry. If the krystle is improved then the krystle is anarchic. If someone hydrolyse the ishmael and they are not improved then the ishmael hydrolyse the valry. If someone action the ishmael and the ishmael does not need the krystle then the krystle action the ishmael. If someone tenderise the ishmael then they need the valry. If someone hydrolyse the rochette then they need the ishmael. The ishmael does not visit the krystle.", "logic": "\nHydrolyse(krystle, rochette)\nAction(krystle, rochette)\nTenderise(valry, ishmael)\nTenderise(valry, rochette)\nImproved(ishmael)\nHydrolyse(ishmael, rochette)\nnot Action(rochette, ishmael)\nforall x (Tenderise(x, krystle) and not Apiculate(x) -> Hydrolyse(krystle, valry))\nImproved(krystle) -> Anarchic(krystle)\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, ishmael) and not Improved(x) -> Hydrolyse(ishmael, valry))\nforall x (Action(x, ishmael) and not Tenderise(ishmael, krystle) -> Action(krystle, ishmael))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, ishmael) -> Tenderise(x, valry))\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, rochette) -> Tenderise(x, ishmael))\n\nnot Action(ishmael, krystle)\n\nnot Action(ishmael, krystle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The pepillo demonise the dagmar. The pepillo examine the dagmar. The chip relinquish the joseph. The chip relinquish the dagmar. The joseph is powerful. The joseph demonise the dagmar. The dagmar does not visit the joseph. If someone relinquish the pepillo and they are not compound then the pepillo demonise the chip. If the pepillo is powerful then the pepillo is sticky. If someone demonise the joseph and they are not powerful then the joseph demonise the chip. If someone examine the joseph and the joseph does not need the pepillo then the pepillo examine the joseph. If someone relinquish the joseph then they need the chip. If someone demonise the dagmar then they need the joseph. The pepillo relinquish the pepillo.", "logic": "\nDemonise(pepillo, dagmar)\nExamine(pepillo, dagmar)\nRelinquish(chip, joseph)\nRelinquish(chip, dagmar)\nPowerful(joseph)\nDemonise(joseph, dagmar)\nnot Examine(dagmar, joseph)\nforall x (Relinquish(x, pepillo) and not Compound(x) -> Demonise(pepillo, chip))\nPowerful(pepillo) -> Sticky(pepillo)\nforall x (Demonise(x, joseph) and not Powerful(x) -> Demonise(joseph, chip))\nforall x (Examine(x, joseph) and not Relinquish(joseph, pepillo) -> Examine(pepillo, joseph))\nforall x (Relinquish(x, joseph) -> Relinquish(x, chip))\nforall x (Demonise(x, dagmar) -> Relinquish(x, joseph))\n\nRelinquish(pepillo, pepillo)\n\nRelinquish(pepillo, pepillo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1367"} {"premises": "The leia outfight the ivett. The leia is paraplegic. The leia skunk the ivett. The leia stale the ivett. The ivett outfight the leia. The ivett is paraplegic. The ivett is sepulchral. The ivett is hilly. The ivett is shaky. The ivett stale the leia. If someone stale the leia then the leia is shaky. If someone stale the ivett and they like the leia then the leia skunk the ivett. If someone is hilly and they chase the ivett then they like the ivett. If someone is shaky then they chase the ivett. If the ivett stale the leia and the leia skunk the ivett then the ivett is sepulchral. If someone is paraplegic and they visit the ivett then the ivett skunk the leia. If someone stale the leia and they visit the ivett then the ivett is paraplegic. If someone outfight the ivett and they like the ivett then they chase the leia. The ivett is shaky.", "logic": "\nOutfight(leia, ivett)\nParaplegic(leia)\nSkunk(leia, ivett)\nStale(leia, ivett)\nOutfight(ivett, leia)\nParaplegic(ivett)\nSepulchral(ivett)\nHilly(ivett)\nShaky(ivett)\nStale(ivett, leia)\nforall x (Stale(x, leia) -> Shaky(leia))\nforall x (Stale(x, ivett) and Skunk(x, leia) -> Skunk(leia, ivett))\nforall x (Hilly(x) and Outfight(x, ivett) -> Skunk(x, ivett))\nforall x (Shaky(x) -> Outfight(x, ivett))\nStale(ivett, leia) and Skunk(leia, ivett) -> Sepulchral(ivett)\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) and Stale(x, ivett) -> Skunk(ivett, leia))\nforall x (Stale(x, leia) and Stale(x, ivett) -> Paraplegic(ivett))\nforall x (Outfight(x, ivett) and Skunk(x, ivett) -> Outfight(x, leia))\n\nShaky(ivett)\n\ntherefore Shaky(ivett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The oralia stroke the linell. The oralia is saving. The oralia disable the linell. The oralia juxtapose the linell. The linell stroke the oralia. The linell is saving. The linell is marred. The linell is miraculous. The linell is attired. The linell juxtapose the oralia. If someone juxtapose the oralia then the oralia is attired. If someone juxtapose the linell and they like the oralia then the oralia disable the linell. If someone is miraculous and they chase the linell then they like the linell. If someone is attired then they chase the linell. If the linell juxtapose the oralia and the oralia disable the linell then the linell is marred. If someone is saving and they visit the linell then the linell disable the oralia. If someone juxtapose the oralia and they visit the linell then the linell is saving. If someone stroke the linell and they like the linell then they chase the oralia. The oralia does not like the linell.", "logic": "\nStroke(oralia, linell)\nSaving(oralia)\nDisable(oralia, linell)\nJuxtapose(oralia, linell)\nStroke(linell, oralia)\nSaving(linell)\nMarred(linell)\nMiraculous(linell)\nAttired(linell)\nJuxtapose(linell, oralia)\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, oralia) -> Attired(oralia))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, linell) and Disable(x, oralia) -> Disable(oralia, linell))\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and Stroke(x, linell) -> Disable(x, linell))\nforall x (Attired(x) -> Stroke(x, linell))\nJuxtapose(linell, oralia) and Disable(oralia, linell) -> Marred(linell)\nforall x (Saving(x) and Juxtapose(x, linell) -> Disable(linell, oralia))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, oralia) and Juxtapose(x, linell) -> Saving(linell))\nforall x (Stroke(x, linell) and Disable(x, linell) -> Stroke(x, oralia))\n\nnot Disable(oralia, linell)\n\ntherefore Disable(oralia, linell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The irita dismiss the valina. The irita is libyan. The irita slip the valina. The irita implant the valina. The valina dismiss the irita. The valina is libyan. The valina is greyish. The valina is menopausal. The valina is translunar. The valina implant the irita. If someone implant the irita then the irita is translunar. If someone implant the valina and they like the irita then the irita slip the valina. If someone is menopausal and they chase the valina then they like the valina. If someone is translunar then they chase the valina. If the valina implant the irita and the irita slip the valina then the valina is greyish. If someone is libyan and they visit the valina then the valina slip the irita. If someone implant the irita and they visit the valina then the valina is libyan. If someone dismiss the valina and they like the valina then they chase the irita. The irita is translunar.", "logic": "\nDismiss(irita, valina)\nLibyan(irita)\nSlip(irita, valina)\nImplant(irita, valina)\nDismiss(valina, irita)\nLibyan(valina)\nGreyish(valina)\nMenopausal(valina)\nTranslunar(valina)\nImplant(valina, irita)\nforall x (Implant(x, irita) -> Translunar(irita))\nforall x (Implant(x, valina) and Slip(x, irita) -> Slip(irita, valina))\nforall x (Menopausal(x) and Dismiss(x, valina) -> Slip(x, valina))\nforall x (Translunar(x) -> Dismiss(x, valina))\nImplant(valina, irita) and Slip(irita, valina) -> Greyish(valina)\nforall x (Libyan(x) and Implant(x, valina) -> Slip(valina, irita))\nforall x (Implant(x, irita) and Implant(x, valina) -> Libyan(valina))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, valina) and Slip(x, valina) -> Dismiss(x, irita))\n\nTranslunar(irita)\n\nImplant(valina, irita) and forall x (Implant(x, irita) -> Translunar(irita)) -> therefore Translunar(irita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The broddy gybe the ebonee. The broddy is oleophilic. The broddy famish the ebonee. The broddy bloody the ebonee. The ebonee gybe the broddy. The ebonee is oleophilic. The ebonee is boreal. The ebonee is sullen. The ebonee is browned. The ebonee bloody the broddy. If someone bloody the broddy then the broddy is browned. If someone bloody the ebonee and they like the broddy then the broddy famish the ebonee. If someone is sullen and they chase the ebonee then they like the ebonee. If someone is browned then they chase the ebonee. If the ebonee bloody the broddy and the broddy famish the ebonee then the ebonee is boreal. If someone is oleophilic and they visit the ebonee then the ebonee famish the broddy. If someone bloody the broddy and they visit the ebonee then the ebonee is oleophilic. If someone gybe the ebonee and they like the ebonee then they chase the broddy. The broddy does not chase the broddy.", "logic": "\nGybe(broddy, ebonee)\nOleophilic(broddy)\nFamish(broddy, ebonee)\nBloody(broddy, ebonee)\nGybe(ebonee, broddy)\nOleophilic(ebonee)\nBoreal(ebonee)\nSullen(ebonee)\nBrowned(ebonee)\nBloody(ebonee, broddy)\nforall x (Bloody(x, broddy) -> Browned(broddy))\nforall x (Bloody(x, ebonee) and Famish(x, broddy) -> Famish(broddy, ebonee))\nforall x (Sullen(x) and Gybe(x, ebonee) -> Famish(x, ebonee))\nforall x (Browned(x) -> Gybe(x, ebonee))\nBloody(ebonee, broddy) and Famish(broddy, ebonee) -> Boreal(ebonee)\nforall x (Oleophilic(x) and Bloody(x, ebonee) -> Famish(ebonee, broddy))\nforall x (Bloody(x, broddy) and Bloody(x, ebonee) -> Oleophilic(ebonee))\nforall x (Gybe(x, ebonee) and Famish(x, ebonee) -> Gybe(x, broddy))\n\nnot Gybe(broddy, broddy)\n\nGybe(broddy, ebonee) and Famish(broddy, ebonee) and forall x (Gybe(x, ebonee) and Famish(x, ebonee) -> Gybe(x, broddy)) -> therefore Gybe(broddy, broddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The moselle fish the mellisent. The moselle is synergetic. The moselle evoke the mellisent. The moselle commission the mellisent. The mellisent fish the moselle. The mellisent is synergetic. The mellisent is saprobic. The mellisent is adsorptive. The mellisent is delimited. The mellisent commission the moselle. If someone commission the moselle then the moselle is delimited. If someone commission the mellisent and they like the moselle then the moselle evoke the mellisent. If someone is adsorptive and they chase the mellisent then they like the mellisent. If someone is delimited then they chase the mellisent. If the mellisent commission the moselle and the moselle evoke the mellisent then the mellisent is saprobic. If someone is synergetic and they visit the mellisent then the mellisent evoke the moselle. If someone commission the moselle and they visit the mellisent then the mellisent is synergetic. If someone fish the mellisent and they like the mellisent then they chase the moselle. The mellisent evoke the mellisent.", "logic": "\nFish(moselle, mellisent)\nSynergetic(moselle)\nEvoke(moselle, mellisent)\nCommission(moselle, mellisent)\nFish(mellisent, moselle)\nSynergetic(mellisent)\nSaprobic(mellisent)\nAdsorptive(mellisent)\nDelimited(mellisent)\nCommission(mellisent, moselle)\nforall x (Commission(x, moselle) -> Delimited(moselle))\nforall x (Commission(x, mellisent) and Evoke(x, moselle) -> Evoke(moselle, mellisent))\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) and Fish(x, mellisent) -> Evoke(x, mellisent))\nforall x (Delimited(x) -> Fish(x, mellisent))\nCommission(mellisent, moselle) and Evoke(moselle, mellisent) -> Saprobic(mellisent)\nforall x (Synergetic(x) and Commission(x, mellisent) -> Evoke(mellisent, moselle))\nforall x (Commission(x, moselle) and Commission(x, mellisent) -> Synergetic(mellisent))\nforall x (Fish(x, mellisent) and Evoke(x, mellisent) -> Fish(x, moselle))\n\nEvoke(mellisent, mellisent)\n\nDelimited(mellisent) and forall x (Delimited(x) -> Fish(x, mellisent)) -> therefore Fish(mellisent, mellisent) Adsorptive(mellisent) and Fish(mellisent, mellisent) and forall x (Adsorptive(x) and Fish(x, mellisent) -> Evoke(x, mellisent)) -> therefore Evoke(mellisent, mellisent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The ruddie snow the barclay. The ruddie is apostate. The ruddie abjure the barclay. The ruddie dillydally the barclay. The barclay snow the ruddie. The barclay is apostate. The barclay is squab. The barclay is grumpy. The barclay is bivalent. The barclay dillydally the ruddie. If someone dillydally the ruddie then the ruddie is bivalent. If someone dillydally the barclay and they like the ruddie then the ruddie abjure the barclay. If someone is grumpy and they chase the barclay then they like the barclay. If someone is bivalent then they chase the barclay. If the barclay dillydally the ruddie and the ruddie abjure the barclay then the barclay is squab. If someone is apostate and they visit the barclay then the barclay abjure the ruddie. If someone dillydally the ruddie and they visit the barclay then the barclay is apostate. If someone snow the barclay and they like the barclay then they chase the ruddie. The barclay does not like the barclay.", "logic": "\nSnow(ruddie, barclay)\nApostate(ruddie)\nAbjure(ruddie, barclay)\nDillydally(ruddie, barclay)\nSnow(barclay, ruddie)\nApostate(barclay)\nSquab(barclay)\nGrumpy(barclay)\nBivalent(barclay)\nDillydally(barclay, ruddie)\nforall x (Dillydally(x, ruddie) -> Bivalent(ruddie))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, barclay) and Abjure(x, ruddie) -> Abjure(ruddie, barclay))\nforall x (Grumpy(x) and Snow(x, barclay) -> Abjure(x, barclay))\nforall x (Bivalent(x) -> Snow(x, barclay))\nDillydally(barclay, ruddie) and Abjure(ruddie, barclay) -> Squab(barclay)\nforall x (Apostate(x) and Dillydally(x, barclay) -> Abjure(barclay, ruddie))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, ruddie) and Dillydally(x, barclay) -> Apostate(barclay))\nforall x (Snow(x, barclay) and Abjure(x, barclay) -> Snow(x, ruddie))\n\nnot Abjure(barclay, barclay)\n\nBivalent(barclay) and forall x (Bivalent(x) -> Snow(x, barclay)) -> therefore Snow(barclay, barclay) Grumpy(barclay) and Snow(barclay, barclay) and forall x (Grumpy(x) and Snow(x, barclay) -> Abjure(x, barclay)) -> therefore Abjure(barclay, barclay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The trudey ladle the shandra. The trudey is cataclinal. The trudey latinize the shandra. The trudey undress the shandra. The shandra ladle the trudey. The shandra is cataclinal. The shandra is tomentose. The shandra is reticular. The shandra is choric. The shandra undress the trudey. If someone undress the trudey then the trudey is choric. If someone undress the shandra and they like the trudey then the trudey latinize the shandra. If someone is reticular and they chase the shandra then they like the shandra. If someone is choric then they chase the shandra. If the shandra undress the trudey and the trudey latinize the shandra then the shandra is tomentose. If someone is cataclinal and they visit the shandra then the shandra latinize the trudey. If someone undress the trudey and they visit the shandra then the shandra is cataclinal. If someone ladle the shandra and they like the shandra then they chase the trudey. The shandra does not visit the shandra.", "logic": "\nLadle(trudey, shandra)\nCataclinal(trudey)\nLatinize(trudey, shandra)\nUndress(trudey, shandra)\nLadle(shandra, trudey)\nCataclinal(shandra)\nTomentose(shandra)\nReticular(shandra)\nChoric(shandra)\nUndress(shandra, trudey)\nforall x (Undress(x, trudey) -> Choric(trudey))\nforall x (Undress(x, shandra) and Latinize(x, trudey) -> Latinize(trudey, shandra))\nforall x (Reticular(x) and Ladle(x, shandra) -> Latinize(x, shandra))\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Ladle(x, shandra))\nUndress(shandra, trudey) and Latinize(trudey, shandra) -> Tomentose(shandra)\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) and Undress(x, shandra) -> Latinize(shandra, trudey))\nforall x (Undress(x, trudey) and Undress(x, shandra) -> Cataclinal(shandra))\nforall x (Ladle(x, shandra) and Latinize(x, shandra) -> Ladle(x, trudey))\n\nnot Undress(shandra, shandra)\n\nnot Undress(shandra, shandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The loreen equal the elianora. The loreen is armorial. The loreen rehouse the elianora. The loreen rebut the elianora. The elianora equal the loreen. The elianora is armorial. The elianora is chipper. The elianora is agone. The elianora is unrenewed. The elianora rebut the loreen. If someone rebut the loreen then the loreen is unrenewed. If someone rebut the elianora and they like the loreen then the loreen rehouse the elianora. If someone is agone and they chase the elianora then they like the elianora. If someone is unrenewed then they chase the elianora. If the elianora rebut the loreen and the loreen rehouse the elianora then the elianora is chipper. If someone is armorial and they visit the elianora then the elianora rehouse the loreen. If someone rebut the loreen and they visit the elianora then the elianora is armorial. If someone equal the elianora and they like the elianora then they chase the loreen. The loreen rehouse the loreen.", "logic": "\nEqual(loreen, elianora)\nArmorial(loreen)\nRehouse(loreen, elianora)\nRebut(loreen, elianora)\nEqual(elianora, loreen)\nArmorial(elianora)\nChipper(elianora)\nAgone(elianora)\nUnrenewed(elianora)\nRebut(elianora, loreen)\nforall x (Rebut(x, loreen) -> Unrenewed(loreen))\nforall x (Rebut(x, elianora) and Rehouse(x, loreen) -> Rehouse(loreen, elianora))\nforall x (Agone(x) and Equal(x, elianora) -> Rehouse(x, elianora))\nforall x (Unrenewed(x) -> Equal(x, elianora))\nRebut(elianora, loreen) and Rehouse(loreen, elianora) -> Chipper(elianora)\nforall x (Armorial(x) and Rebut(x, elianora) -> Rehouse(elianora, loreen))\nforall x (Rebut(x, loreen) and Rebut(x, elianora) -> Armorial(elianora))\nforall x (Equal(x, elianora) and Rehouse(x, elianora) -> Equal(x, loreen))\n\nRehouse(loreen, loreen)\n\nRehouse(loreen, loreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The gina bamboozle the lester. The gina is sublingual. The gina sympathize the lester. The gina companion the lester. The lester bamboozle the gina. The lester is sublingual. The lester is mass. The lester is cowardly. The lester is centroidal. The lester companion the gina. If someone companion the gina then the gina is centroidal. If someone companion the lester and they like the gina then the gina sympathize the lester. If someone is cowardly and they chase the lester then they like the lester. If someone is centroidal then they chase the lester. If the lester companion the gina and the gina sympathize the lester then the lester is mass. If someone is sublingual and they visit the lester then the lester sympathize the gina. If someone companion the gina and they visit the lester then the lester is sublingual. If someone bamboozle the lester and they like the lester then they chase the gina. The gina is not nice.", "logic": "\nBamboozle(gina, lester)\nSublingual(gina)\nSympathize(gina, lester)\nCompanion(gina, lester)\nBamboozle(lester, gina)\nSublingual(lester)\nMass(lester)\nCowardly(lester)\nCentroidal(lester)\nCompanion(lester, gina)\nforall x (Companion(x, gina) -> Centroidal(gina))\nforall x (Companion(x, lester) and Sympathize(x, gina) -> Sympathize(gina, lester))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) and Bamboozle(x, lester) -> Sympathize(x, lester))\nforall x (Centroidal(x) -> Bamboozle(x, lester))\nCompanion(lester, gina) and Sympathize(gina, lester) -> Mass(lester)\nforall x (Sublingual(x) and Companion(x, lester) -> Sympathize(lester, gina))\nforall x (Companion(x, gina) and Companion(x, lester) -> Sublingual(lester))\nforall x (Bamboozle(x, lester) and Sympathize(x, lester) -> Bamboozle(x, gina))\n\nnot Nice(gina)\n\nnot Nice(gina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The gail assign the gabie. The gail is anaclitic. The gail prowl the gabie. The gail satisfice the gabie. The gabie assign the gail. The gabie is anaclitic. The gabie is unmediated. The gabie is anestrous. The gabie is obliged. The gabie satisfice the gail. If someone satisfice the gail then the gail is obliged. If someone satisfice the gabie and they like the gail then the gail prowl the gabie. If someone is anestrous and they chase the gabie then they like the gabie. If someone is obliged then they chase the gabie. If the gabie satisfice the gail and the gail prowl the gabie then the gabie is unmediated. If someone is anaclitic and they visit the gabie then the gabie prowl the gail. If someone satisfice the gail and they visit the gabie then the gabie is anaclitic. If someone assign the gabie and they like the gabie then they chase the gail. The gail is unmediated.", "logic": "\nAssign(gail, gabie)\nAnaclitic(gail)\nProwl(gail, gabie)\nSatisfice(gail, gabie)\nAssign(gabie, gail)\nAnaclitic(gabie)\nUnmediated(gabie)\nAnestrous(gabie)\nObliged(gabie)\nSatisfice(gabie, gail)\nforall x (Satisfice(x, gail) -> Obliged(gail))\nforall x (Satisfice(x, gabie) and Prowl(x, gail) -> Prowl(gail, gabie))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) and Assign(x, gabie) -> Prowl(x, gabie))\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Assign(x, gabie))\nSatisfice(gabie, gail) and Prowl(gail, gabie) -> Unmediated(gabie)\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and Satisfice(x, gabie) -> Prowl(gabie, gail))\nforall x (Satisfice(x, gail) and Satisfice(x, gabie) -> Anaclitic(gabie))\nforall x (Assign(x, gabie) and Prowl(x, gabie) -> Assign(x, gail))\n\nUnmediated(gail)\n\nUnmediated(gail) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The angelia capitulate the dwayne. The angelia is stochastic. The angelia muzzle the dwayne. The angelia surprise the dwayne. The dwayne capitulate the angelia. The dwayne is stochastic. The dwayne is pierced. The dwayne is cattish. The dwayne is alar. The dwayne surprise the angelia. If someone surprise the angelia then the angelia is alar. If someone surprise the dwayne and they like the angelia then the angelia muzzle the dwayne. If someone is cattish and they chase the dwayne then they like the dwayne. If someone is alar then they chase the dwayne. If the dwayne surprise the angelia and the angelia muzzle the dwayne then the dwayne is pierced. If someone is stochastic and they visit the dwayne then the dwayne muzzle the angelia. If someone surprise the angelia and they visit the dwayne then the dwayne is stochastic. If someone capitulate the dwayne and they like the dwayne then they chase the angelia. The dwayne is not nice.", "logic": "\nCapitulate(angelia, dwayne)\nStochastic(angelia)\nMuzzle(angelia, dwayne)\nSurprise(angelia, dwayne)\nCapitulate(dwayne, angelia)\nStochastic(dwayne)\nPierced(dwayne)\nCattish(dwayne)\nAlar(dwayne)\nSurprise(dwayne, angelia)\nforall x (Surprise(x, angelia) -> Alar(angelia))\nforall x (Surprise(x, dwayne) and Muzzle(x, angelia) -> Muzzle(angelia, dwayne))\nforall x (Cattish(x) and Capitulate(x, dwayne) -> Muzzle(x, dwayne))\nforall x (Alar(x) -> Capitulate(x, dwayne))\nSurprise(dwayne, angelia) and Muzzle(angelia, dwayne) -> Pierced(dwayne)\nforall x (Stochastic(x) and Surprise(x, dwayne) -> Muzzle(dwayne, angelia))\nforall x (Surprise(x, angelia) and Surprise(x, dwayne) -> Stochastic(dwayne))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, dwayne) and Muzzle(x, dwayne) -> Capitulate(x, angelia))\n\nnot Nice(dwayne)\n\nnot Nice(dwayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The cornelius focalize the debbi. The cornelius is interfaith. The cornelius fornicate the debbi. The cornelius overwhelm the debbi. The debbi focalize the cornelius. The debbi is interfaith. The debbi is parallel. The debbi is million. The debbi is facial. The debbi overwhelm the cornelius. If someone overwhelm the cornelius then the cornelius is facial. If someone overwhelm the debbi and they like the cornelius then the cornelius fornicate the debbi. If someone is million and they chase the debbi then they like the debbi. If someone is facial then they chase the debbi. If the debbi overwhelm the cornelius and the cornelius fornicate the debbi then the debbi is parallel. If someone is interfaith and they visit the debbi then the debbi fornicate the cornelius. If someone overwhelm the cornelius and they visit the debbi then the debbi is interfaith. If someone focalize the debbi and they like the debbi then they chase the cornelius. The cornelius overwhelm the cornelius.", "logic": "\nFocalize(cornelius, debbi)\nInterfaith(cornelius)\nFornicate(cornelius, debbi)\nOverwhelm(cornelius, debbi)\nFocalize(debbi, cornelius)\nInterfaith(debbi)\nParallel(debbi)\nMillion(debbi)\nFacial(debbi)\nOverwhelm(debbi, cornelius)\nforall x (Overwhelm(x, cornelius) -> Facial(cornelius))\nforall x (Overwhelm(x, debbi) and Fornicate(x, cornelius) -> Fornicate(cornelius, debbi))\nforall x (Million(x) and Focalize(x, debbi) -> Fornicate(x, debbi))\nforall x (Facial(x) -> Focalize(x, debbi))\nOverwhelm(debbi, cornelius) and Fornicate(cornelius, debbi) -> Parallel(debbi)\nforall x (Interfaith(x) and Overwhelm(x, debbi) -> Fornicate(debbi, cornelius))\nforall x (Overwhelm(x, cornelius) and Overwhelm(x, debbi) -> Interfaith(debbi))\nforall x (Focalize(x, debbi) and Fornicate(x, debbi) -> Focalize(x, cornelius))\n\nOverwhelm(cornelius, cornelius)\n\nOverwhelm(cornelius, cornelius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-467"} {"premises": "The nissie is mean. The nissie break the tarrant. The nissie nerve the faun. The nissie nerve the mariel. The faun sleek the mariel. The faun is not floury. The faun is mean. The mariel does not eat the faun. The mariel is not lecherous. The mariel break the faun. The tarrant sleek the faun. The tarrant is mean. If someone nerve the faun and the faun sleek the nissie then they need the faun. If someone break the tarrant then the tarrant break the nissie. If someone nerve the tarrant then they need the nissie. Green people are lecherous. If someone is floury and they eat the tarrant then the tarrant does not eat the faun. If the mariel is not coequal then the mariel sleek the faun. If someone is floury then they do not eat the mariel. If someone is lecherous then they eat the nissie. The tarrant is mean.", "logic": "\nMean(nissie)\nBreak(nissie, tarrant)\nNerve(nissie, faun)\nNerve(nissie, mariel)\nSleek(faun, mariel)\nnot Floury(faun)\nMean(faun)\nnot Sleek(mariel, faun)\nnot Lecherous(mariel)\nBreak(mariel, faun)\nSleek(tarrant, faun)\nMean(tarrant)\nforall x (Nerve(x, faun) and Sleek(faun, nissie) -> Break(x, faun))\nforall x (Break(x, tarrant) -> Break(tarrant, nissie))\nforall x (Nerve(x, tarrant) -> Break(x, nissie))\nforall x (Mean(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nforall x (Floury(x) and Sleek(x, tarrant) -> not Sleek(tarrant, faun))\nnot Coequal(mariel) -> Sleek(mariel, faun)\nforall x (Floury(x) -> not Sleek(x, mariel))\nforall x (Lecherous(x) -> Sleek(x, nissie))\n\nMean(tarrant)\n\ntherefore Mean(tarrant)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The monroe is soviet. The monroe silt the aubrey. The monroe lucubrate the madelaine. The monroe lucubrate the orelee. The madelaine booze the orelee. The madelaine is not diseased. The madelaine is soviet. The orelee does not eat the madelaine. The orelee is not delineated. The orelee silt the madelaine. The aubrey booze the madelaine. The aubrey is soviet. If someone lucubrate the madelaine and the madelaine booze the monroe then they need the madelaine. If someone silt the aubrey then the aubrey silt the monroe. If someone lucubrate the aubrey then they need the monroe. Green people are delineated. If someone is diseased and they eat the aubrey then the aubrey does not eat the madelaine. If the orelee is not slaty then the orelee booze the madelaine. If someone is diseased then they do not eat the orelee. If someone is delineated then they eat the monroe. The madelaine does not eat the orelee.", "logic": "\nSoviet(monroe)\nSilt(monroe, aubrey)\nLucubrate(monroe, madelaine)\nLucubrate(monroe, orelee)\nBooze(madelaine, orelee)\nnot Diseased(madelaine)\nSoviet(madelaine)\nnot Booze(orelee, madelaine)\nnot Delineated(orelee)\nSilt(orelee, madelaine)\nBooze(aubrey, madelaine)\nSoviet(aubrey)\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, madelaine) and Booze(madelaine, monroe) -> Silt(x, madelaine))\nforall x (Silt(x, aubrey) -> Silt(aubrey, monroe))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, aubrey) -> Silt(x, monroe))\nforall x (Soviet(x) -> Delineated(x))\nforall x (Diseased(x) and Booze(x, aubrey) -> not Booze(aubrey, madelaine))\nnot Slaty(orelee) -> Booze(orelee, madelaine)\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> not Booze(x, orelee))\nforall x (Delineated(x) -> Booze(x, monroe))\n\nnot Booze(madelaine, orelee)\n\ntherefore Booze(madelaine, orelee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The hyacinthe is overjoyed. The hyacinthe toady the ollie. The hyacinthe alkalinize the chelsie. The hyacinthe alkalinize the fionna. The chelsie communize the fionna. The chelsie is not thespian. The chelsie is overjoyed. The fionna does not eat the chelsie. The fionna is not nonleaded. The fionna toady the chelsie. The ollie communize the chelsie. The ollie is overjoyed. If someone alkalinize the chelsie and the chelsie communize the hyacinthe then they need the chelsie. If someone toady the ollie then the ollie toady the hyacinthe. If someone alkalinize the ollie then they need the hyacinthe. Green people are nonleaded. If someone is thespian and they eat the ollie then the ollie does not eat the chelsie. If the fionna is not brainless then the fionna communize the chelsie. If someone is thespian then they do not eat the fionna. If someone is nonleaded then they eat the hyacinthe. The ollie is nonleaded.", "logic": "\nOverjoyed(hyacinthe)\nToady(hyacinthe, ollie)\nAlkalinize(hyacinthe, chelsie)\nAlkalinize(hyacinthe, fionna)\nCommunize(chelsie, fionna)\nnot Thespian(chelsie)\nOverjoyed(chelsie)\nnot Communize(fionna, chelsie)\nnot Nonleaded(fionna)\nToady(fionna, chelsie)\nCommunize(ollie, chelsie)\nOverjoyed(ollie)\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, chelsie) and Communize(chelsie, hyacinthe) -> Toady(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Toady(x, ollie) -> Toady(ollie, hyacinthe))\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, ollie) -> Toady(x, hyacinthe))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) -> Nonleaded(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) and Communize(x, ollie) -> not Communize(ollie, chelsie))\nnot Brainless(fionna) -> Communize(fionna, chelsie)\nforall x (Thespian(x) -> not Communize(x, fionna))\nforall x (Nonleaded(x) -> Communize(x, hyacinthe))\n\nNonleaded(ollie)\n\nOverjoyed(ollie) and forall x (Overjoyed(x) -> Nonleaded(x)) -> therefore Nonleaded(ollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The isa is dissolved. The isa gossip the mattheus. The isa plot the ilka. The isa plot the shantee. The ilka cushion the shantee. The ilka is not verrucose. The ilka is dissolved. The shantee does not eat the ilka. The shantee is not assisted. The shantee gossip the ilka. The mattheus cushion the ilka. The mattheus is dissolved. If someone plot the ilka and the ilka cushion the isa then they need the ilka. If someone gossip the mattheus then the mattheus gossip the isa. If someone plot the mattheus then they need the isa. Green people are assisted. If someone is verrucose and they eat the mattheus then the mattheus does not eat the ilka. If the shantee is not secondhand then the shantee cushion the ilka. If someone is verrucose then they do not eat the shantee. If someone is assisted then they eat the isa. The isa is not assisted.", "logic": "\nDissolved(isa)\nGossip(isa, mattheus)\nPlot(isa, ilka)\nPlot(isa, shantee)\nCushion(ilka, shantee)\nnot Verrucose(ilka)\nDissolved(ilka)\nnot Cushion(shantee, ilka)\nnot Assisted(shantee)\nGossip(shantee, ilka)\nCushion(mattheus, ilka)\nDissolved(mattheus)\nforall x (Plot(x, ilka) and Cushion(ilka, isa) -> Gossip(x, ilka))\nforall x (Gossip(x, mattheus) -> Gossip(mattheus, isa))\nforall x (Plot(x, mattheus) -> Gossip(x, isa))\nforall x (Dissolved(x) -> Assisted(x))\nforall x (Verrucose(x) and Cushion(x, mattheus) -> not Cushion(mattheus, ilka))\nnot Secondhand(shantee) -> Cushion(shantee, ilka)\nforall x (Verrucose(x) -> not Cushion(x, shantee))\nforall x (Assisted(x) -> Cushion(x, isa))\n\nnot Assisted(isa)\n\nDissolved(isa) and forall x (Dissolved(x) -> Assisted(x)) -> therefore Assisted(isa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The aubree is botched. The aubree excite the tana. The aubree blight the leigh. The aubree blight the noelani. The leigh prolapse the noelani. The leigh is not flushed. The leigh is botched. The noelani does not eat the leigh. The noelani is not cusped. The noelani excite the leigh. The tana prolapse the leigh. The tana is botched. If someone blight the leigh and the leigh prolapse the aubree then they need the leigh. If someone excite the tana then the tana excite the aubree. If someone blight the tana then they need the aubree. Green people are cusped. If someone is flushed and they eat the tana then the tana does not eat the leigh. If the noelani is not bicolour then the noelani prolapse the leigh. If someone is flushed then they do not eat the noelani. If someone is cusped then they eat the aubree. The leigh prolapse the aubree.", "logic": "\nBotched(aubree)\nExcite(aubree, tana)\nBlight(aubree, leigh)\nBlight(aubree, noelani)\nProlapse(leigh, noelani)\nnot Flushed(leigh)\nBotched(leigh)\nnot Prolapse(noelani, leigh)\nnot Cusped(noelani)\nExcite(noelani, leigh)\nProlapse(tana, leigh)\nBotched(tana)\nforall x (Blight(x, leigh) and Prolapse(leigh, aubree) -> Excite(x, leigh))\nforall x (Excite(x, tana) -> Excite(tana, aubree))\nforall x (Blight(x, tana) -> Excite(x, aubree))\nforall x (Botched(x) -> Cusped(x))\nforall x (Flushed(x) and Prolapse(x, tana) -> not Prolapse(tana, leigh))\nnot Bicolour(noelani) -> Prolapse(noelani, leigh)\nforall x (Flushed(x) -> not Prolapse(x, noelani))\nforall x (Cusped(x) -> Prolapse(x, aubree))\n\nProlapse(leigh, aubree)\n\nBotched(leigh) and forall x (Botched(x) -> Cusped(x)) -> therefore Cusped(leigh) Cusped(leigh) and forall x (Cusped(x) -> Prolapse(x, aubree)) -> therefore Prolapse(leigh, aubree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The tod is milky. The tod pother the anica. The tod catch the idette. The tod catch the kora. The idette groin the kora. The idette is not anodal. The idette is milky. The kora does not eat the idette. The kora is not vegetal. The kora pother the idette. The anica groin the idette. The anica is milky. If someone catch the idette and the idette groin the tod then they need the idette. If someone pother the anica then the anica pother the tod. If someone catch the anica then they need the tod. Green people are vegetal. If someone is anodal and they eat the anica then the anica does not eat the idette. If the kora is not dissolved then the kora groin the idette. If someone is anodal then they do not eat the kora. If someone is vegetal then they eat the tod. The idette does not eat the tod.", "logic": "\nMilky(tod)\nPother(tod, anica)\nCatch(tod, idette)\nCatch(tod, kora)\nGroin(idette, kora)\nnot Anodal(idette)\nMilky(idette)\nnot Groin(kora, idette)\nnot Vegetal(kora)\nPother(kora, idette)\nGroin(anica, idette)\nMilky(anica)\nforall x (Catch(x, idette) and Groin(idette, tod) -> Pother(x, idette))\nforall x (Pother(x, anica) -> Pother(anica, tod))\nforall x (Catch(x, anica) -> Pother(x, tod))\nforall x (Milky(x) -> Vegetal(x))\nforall x (Anodal(x) and Groin(x, anica) -> not Groin(anica, idette))\nnot Dissolved(kora) -> Groin(kora, idette)\nforall x (Anodal(x) -> not Groin(x, kora))\nforall x (Vegetal(x) -> Groin(x, tod))\n\nnot Groin(idette, tod)\n\nMilky(idette) and forall x (Milky(x) -> Vegetal(x)) -> therefore Vegetal(idette) Vegetal(idette) and forall x (Vegetal(x) -> Groin(x, tod)) -> therefore Groin(idette, tod)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The zelma is prim. The zelma suffer the bruno. The zelma cuckoo the harri. The zelma cuckoo the pavla. The harri despond the pavla. The harri is not saharan. The harri is prim. The pavla does not eat the harri. The pavla is not offhanded. The pavla suffer the harri. The bruno despond the harri. The bruno is prim. If someone cuckoo the harri and the harri despond the zelma then they need the harri. If someone suffer the bruno then the bruno suffer the zelma. If someone cuckoo the bruno then they need the zelma. Green people are offhanded. If someone is saharan and they eat the bruno then the bruno does not eat the harri. If the pavla is not diatomic then the pavla despond the harri. If someone is saharan then they do not eat the pavla. If someone is offhanded then they eat the zelma. The zelma does not need the zelma.", "logic": "\nPrim(zelma)\nSuffer(zelma, bruno)\nCuckoo(zelma, harri)\nCuckoo(zelma, pavla)\nDespond(harri, pavla)\nnot Saharan(harri)\nPrim(harri)\nnot Despond(pavla, harri)\nnot Offhanded(pavla)\nSuffer(pavla, harri)\nDespond(bruno, harri)\nPrim(bruno)\nforall x (Cuckoo(x, harri) and Despond(harri, zelma) -> Suffer(x, harri))\nforall x (Suffer(x, bruno) -> Suffer(bruno, zelma))\nforall x (Cuckoo(x, bruno) -> Suffer(x, zelma))\nforall x (Prim(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Saharan(x) and Despond(x, bruno) -> not Despond(bruno, harri))\nnot Diatomic(pavla) -> Despond(pavla, harri)\nforall x (Saharan(x) -> not Despond(x, pavla))\nforall x (Offhanded(x) -> Despond(x, zelma))\n\nnot Suffer(zelma, zelma)\n\nforall x (Cuckoo(x, bruno) -> Suffer(x, zelma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The bridgett is warm. The bridgett outsell the hope. The bridgett appoint the sarette. The bridgett appoint the karita. The sarette jaywalk the karita. The sarette is not emollient. The sarette is warm. The karita does not eat the sarette. The karita is not adsorptive. The karita outsell the sarette. The hope jaywalk the sarette. The hope is warm. If someone appoint the sarette and the sarette jaywalk the bridgett then they need the sarette. If someone outsell the hope then the hope outsell the bridgett. If someone appoint the hope then they need the bridgett. Green people are adsorptive. If someone is emollient and they eat the hope then the hope does not eat the sarette. If the karita is not soppy then the karita jaywalk the sarette. If someone is emollient then they do not eat the karita. If someone is adsorptive then they eat the bridgett. The karita jaywalk the bridgett.", "logic": "\nWarm(bridgett)\nOutsell(bridgett, hope)\nAppoint(bridgett, sarette)\nAppoint(bridgett, karita)\nJaywalk(sarette, karita)\nnot Emollient(sarette)\nWarm(sarette)\nnot Jaywalk(karita, sarette)\nnot Adsorptive(karita)\nOutsell(karita, sarette)\nJaywalk(hope, sarette)\nWarm(hope)\nforall x (Appoint(x, sarette) and Jaywalk(sarette, bridgett) -> Outsell(x, sarette))\nforall x (Outsell(x, hope) -> Outsell(hope, bridgett))\nforall x (Appoint(x, hope) -> Outsell(x, bridgett))\nforall x (Warm(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Emollient(x) and Jaywalk(x, hope) -> not Jaywalk(hope, sarette))\nnot Soppy(karita) -> Jaywalk(karita, sarette)\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> not Jaywalk(x, karita))\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) -> Jaywalk(x, bridgett))\n\nJaywalk(karita, bridgett)\n\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) -> Jaywalk(x, bridgett)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The jeniffer is stacked. The jeniffer hone the lazlo. The jeniffer smelt the tad. The jeniffer smelt the stoddard. The tad shellac the stoddard. The tad is not abscessed. The tad is stacked. The stoddard does not eat the tad. The stoddard is not berrylike. The stoddard hone the tad. The lazlo shellac the tad. The lazlo is stacked. If someone smelt the tad and the tad shellac the jeniffer then they need the tad. If someone hone the lazlo then the lazlo hone the jeniffer. If someone smelt the lazlo then they need the jeniffer. Green people are berrylike. If someone is abscessed and they eat the lazlo then the lazlo does not eat the tad. If the stoddard is not homeric then the stoddard shellac the tad. If someone is abscessed then they do not eat the stoddard. If someone is berrylike then they eat the jeniffer. The lazlo does not need the tad.", "logic": "\nStacked(jeniffer)\nHone(jeniffer, lazlo)\nSmelt(jeniffer, tad)\nSmelt(jeniffer, stoddard)\nShellac(tad, stoddard)\nnot Abscessed(tad)\nStacked(tad)\nnot Shellac(stoddard, tad)\nnot Berrylike(stoddard)\nHone(stoddard, tad)\nShellac(lazlo, tad)\nStacked(lazlo)\nforall x (Smelt(x, tad) and Shellac(tad, jeniffer) -> Hone(x, tad))\nforall x (Hone(x, lazlo) -> Hone(lazlo, jeniffer))\nforall x (Smelt(x, lazlo) -> Hone(x, jeniffer))\nforall x (Stacked(x) -> Berrylike(x))\nforall x (Abscessed(x) and Shellac(x, lazlo) -> not Shellac(lazlo, tad))\nnot Homeric(stoddard) -> Shellac(stoddard, tad)\nforall x (Abscessed(x) -> not Shellac(x, stoddard))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) -> Shellac(x, jeniffer))\n\nnot Hone(lazlo, tad)\n\nforall x (Smelt(x, tad) and Shellac(tad, jeniffer) -> Hone(x, tad)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The madonna is romantic. The madonna thrombose the sheffie. The madonna burr the ursuline. The madonna burr the odelia. The ursuline rile the odelia. The ursuline is not allogeneic. The ursuline is romantic. The odelia does not eat the ursuline. The odelia is not reverting. The odelia thrombose the ursuline. The sheffie rile the ursuline. The sheffie is romantic. If someone burr the ursuline and the ursuline rile the madonna then they need the ursuline. If someone thrombose the sheffie then the sheffie thrombose the madonna. If someone burr the sheffie then they need the madonna. Green people are reverting. If someone is allogeneic and they eat the sheffie then the sheffie does not eat the ursuline. If the odelia is not binuclear then the odelia rile the ursuline. If someone is allogeneic then they do not eat the odelia. If someone is reverting then they eat the madonna. The madonna rile the ursuline.", "logic": "\nRomantic(madonna)\nThrombose(madonna, sheffie)\nBurr(madonna, ursuline)\nBurr(madonna, odelia)\nRile(ursuline, odelia)\nnot Allogeneic(ursuline)\nRomantic(ursuline)\nnot Rile(odelia, ursuline)\nnot Reverting(odelia)\nThrombose(odelia, ursuline)\nRile(sheffie, ursuline)\nRomantic(sheffie)\nforall x (Burr(x, ursuline) and Rile(ursuline, madonna) -> Thrombose(x, ursuline))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, sheffie) -> Thrombose(sheffie, madonna))\nforall x (Burr(x, sheffie) -> Thrombose(x, madonna))\nforall x (Romantic(x) -> Reverting(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) and Rile(x, sheffie) -> not Rile(sheffie, ursuline))\nnot Binuclear(odelia) -> Rile(odelia, ursuline)\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> not Rile(x, odelia))\nforall x (Reverting(x) -> Rile(x, madonna))\n\nRile(madonna, ursuline)\n\nRile(madonna, ursuline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The malynda is norwegian. The malynda marinate the daryle. The malynda forge the aindrea. The malynda forge the evey. The aindrea defy the evey. The aindrea is not sovereign. The aindrea is norwegian. The evey does not eat the aindrea. The evey is not shivery. The evey marinate the aindrea. The daryle defy the aindrea. The daryle is norwegian. If someone forge the aindrea and the aindrea defy the malynda then they need the aindrea. If someone marinate the daryle then the daryle marinate the malynda. If someone forge the daryle then they need the malynda. Green people are shivery. If someone is sovereign and they eat the daryle then the daryle does not eat the aindrea. If the evey is not societal then the evey defy the aindrea. If someone is sovereign then they do not eat the evey. If someone is shivery then they eat the malynda. The aindrea is not blue.", "logic": "\nNorwegian(malynda)\nMarinate(malynda, daryle)\nForge(malynda, aindrea)\nForge(malynda, evey)\nDefy(aindrea, evey)\nnot Sovereign(aindrea)\nNorwegian(aindrea)\nnot Defy(evey, aindrea)\nnot Shivery(evey)\nMarinate(evey, aindrea)\nDefy(daryle, aindrea)\nNorwegian(daryle)\nforall x (Forge(x, aindrea) and Defy(aindrea, malynda) -> Marinate(x, aindrea))\nforall x (Marinate(x, daryle) -> Marinate(daryle, malynda))\nforall x (Forge(x, daryle) -> Marinate(x, malynda))\nforall x (Norwegian(x) -> Shivery(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Defy(x, daryle) -> not Defy(daryle, aindrea))\nnot Societal(evey) -> Defy(evey, aindrea)\nforall x (Sovereign(x) -> not Defy(x, evey))\nforall x (Shivery(x) -> Defy(x, malynda))\n\nnot Blue(aindrea)\n\nnot Blue(aindrea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The shoshana is shrieked. The shoshana allude the rheba. The shoshana travel the vail. The shoshana travel the bernelle. The vail alienate the bernelle. The vail is not rigid. The vail is shrieked. The bernelle does not eat the vail. The bernelle is not moderate. The bernelle allude the vail. The rheba alienate the vail. The rheba is shrieked. If someone travel the vail and the vail alienate the shoshana then they need the vail. If someone allude the rheba then the rheba allude the shoshana. If someone travel the rheba then they need the shoshana. Green people are moderate. If someone is rigid and they eat the rheba then the rheba does not eat the vail. If the bernelle is not splayfoot then the bernelle alienate the vail. If someone is rigid then they do not eat the bernelle. If someone is moderate then they eat the shoshana. The vail travel the bernelle.", "logic": "\nShrieked(shoshana)\nAllude(shoshana, rheba)\nTravel(shoshana, vail)\nTravel(shoshana, bernelle)\nAlienate(vail, bernelle)\nnot Rigid(vail)\nShrieked(vail)\nnot Alienate(bernelle, vail)\nnot Moderate(bernelle)\nAllude(bernelle, vail)\nAlienate(rheba, vail)\nShrieked(rheba)\nforall x (Travel(x, vail) and Alienate(vail, shoshana) -> Allude(x, vail))\nforall x (Allude(x, rheba) -> Allude(rheba, shoshana))\nforall x (Travel(x, rheba) -> Allude(x, shoshana))\nforall x (Shrieked(x) -> Moderate(x))\nforall x (Rigid(x) and Alienate(x, rheba) -> not Alienate(rheba, vail))\nnot Splayfoot(bernelle) -> Alienate(bernelle, vail)\nforall x (Rigid(x) -> not Alienate(x, bernelle))\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Alienate(x, shoshana))\n\nTravel(vail, bernelle)\n\nTravel(vail, bernelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1599"} {"premises": "The gerry exonerate the barret. The barret does not like the gerry. If someone exonerate the gerry then they are not swimming. If someone exonerate the barret then they eat the barret. If someone nitrate the barret then they are not assigned. The barret does not like the gerry.", "logic": "\nExonerate(gerry, barret)\nnot Exonerate(barret, gerry)\nforall x (Exonerate(x, gerry) -> not Swimming(x))\nforall x (Exonerate(x, barret) -> Nitrate(x, barret))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, barret) -> not Assigned(x))\n\nnot Exonerate(barret, gerry)\n\ntherefore not Exonerate(barret, gerry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The mike tackle the isabella. The isabella does not like the mike. If someone tackle the mike then they are not punctured. If someone tackle the isabella then they eat the isabella. If someone fruit the isabella then they are not eatable. The mike does not like the isabella.", "logic": "\nTackle(mike, isabella)\nnot Tackle(isabella, mike)\nforall x (Tackle(x, mike) -> not Punctured(x))\nforall x (Tackle(x, isabella) -> Fruit(x, isabella))\nforall x (Fruit(x, isabella) -> not Eatable(x))\n\nnot Tackle(mike, isabella)\n\ntherefore Tackle(mike, isabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The olin walk the molly. The molly does not like the olin. If someone walk the olin then they are not falciform. If someone walk the molly then they eat the molly. If someone desalinize the molly then they are not lifesize. The olin desalinize the molly.", "logic": "\nWalk(olin, molly)\nnot Walk(molly, olin)\nforall x (Walk(x, olin) -> not Falciform(x))\nforall x (Walk(x, molly) -> Desalinize(x, molly))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, molly) -> not Lifesize(x))\n\nDesalinize(olin, molly)\n\nWalk(olin, molly) and forall x (Walk(x, molly) -> Desalinize(x, molly)) -> therefore Desalinize(olin, molly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The darren mussitate the lida. The lida does not like the darren. If someone mussitate the darren then they are not validating. If someone mussitate the lida then they eat the lida. If someone enjoy the lida then they are not glorified. The darren does not eat the lida.", "logic": "\nMussitate(darren, lida)\nnot Mussitate(lida, darren)\nforall x (Mussitate(x, darren) -> not Validating(x))\nforall x (Mussitate(x, lida) -> Enjoy(x, lida))\nforall x (Enjoy(x, lida) -> not Glorified(x))\n\nnot Enjoy(darren, lida)\n\nMussitate(darren, lida) and forall x (Mussitate(x, lida) -> Enjoy(x, lida)) -> therefore Enjoy(darren, lida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The ebony desorb the shawnee. The shawnee does not like the ebony. If someone desorb the ebony then they are not antitumor. If someone desorb the shawnee then they eat the shawnee. If someone persuade the shawnee then they are not resonant. The ebony is not resonant.", "logic": "\nDesorb(ebony, shawnee)\nnot Desorb(shawnee, ebony)\nforall x (Desorb(x, ebony) -> not Antitumor(x))\nforall x (Desorb(x, shawnee) -> Persuade(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Persuade(x, shawnee) -> not Resonant(x))\n\nnot Resonant(ebony)\n\nDesorb(ebony, shawnee) and forall x (Desorb(x, shawnee) -> Persuade(x, shawnee)) -> therefore Persuade(ebony, shawnee) Persuade(ebony, shawnee) and forall x (Persuade(x, shawnee) -> not Resonant(x)) -> therefore not Resonant(ebony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The nat enable the faith. The faith does not like the nat. If someone enable the nat then they are not booked. If someone enable the faith then they eat the faith. If someone loom the faith then they are not unspaced. The nat is unspaced.", "logic": "\nEnable(nat, faith)\nnot Enable(faith, nat)\nforall x (Enable(x, nat) -> not Booked(x))\nforall x (Enable(x, faith) -> Loom(x, faith))\nforall x (Loom(x, faith) -> not Unspaced(x))\n\nUnspaced(nat)\n\nEnable(nat, faith) and forall x (Enable(x, faith) -> Loom(x, faith)) -> therefore Loom(nat, faith) Loom(nat, faith) and forall x (Loom(x, faith) -> not Unspaced(x)) -> therefore not Unspaced(nat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The elizabet animalize the fergus. The fergus does not like the elizabet. If someone animalize the elizabet then they are not scrubby. If someone animalize the fergus then they eat the fergus. If someone subdivide the fergus then they are not seated. The fergus does not eat the fergus.", "logic": "\nAnimalize(elizabet, fergus)\nnot Animalize(fergus, elizabet)\nforall x (Animalize(x, elizabet) -> not Scrubby(x))\nforall x (Animalize(x, fergus) -> Subdivide(x, fergus))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, fergus) -> not Seated(x))\n\nnot Subdivide(fergus, fergus)\n\nforall x (Animalize(x, fergus) -> Subdivide(x, fergus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The corabel compact the gregorio. The gregorio does not like the corabel. If someone compact the corabel then they are not emblematic. If someone compact the gregorio then they eat the gregorio. If someone bridge the gregorio then they are not taoist. The gregorio chases the gregorio.", "logic": "\nCompact(corabel, gregorio)\nnot Compact(gregorio, corabel)\nforall x (Compact(x, corabel) -> not Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Compact(x, gregorio) -> Bridge(x, gregorio))\nforall x (Bridge(x, gregorio) -> not Taoist(x))\n\nChases(gregorio, gregorio)\n\nChases(gregorio, gregorio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The beatriz heel the britni. The britni does not like the beatriz. If someone heel the beatriz then they are not unenforced. If someone heel the britni then they eat the britni. If someone brim the britni then they are not bionic. The britni is not big.", "logic": "\nHeel(beatriz, britni)\nnot Heel(britni, beatriz)\nforall x (Heel(x, beatriz) -> not Unenforced(x))\nforall x (Heel(x, britni) -> Brim(x, britni))\nforall x (Brim(x, britni) -> not Bionic(x))\n\nnot Big(britni)\n\nnot Big(britni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The marieann alloy the maible. The maible does not like the marieann. If someone alloy the marieann then they are not abscessed. If someone alloy the maible then they eat the maible. If someone point the maible then they are not next. The maible is next.", "logic": "\nAlloy(marieann, maible)\nnot Alloy(maible, marieann)\nforall x (Alloy(x, marieann) -> not Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Alloy(x, maible) -> Point(x, maible))\nforall x (Point(x, maible) -> not Next(x))\n\nNext(maible)\n\nNext(maible) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The tyrone encounter the zolly. The zolly does not like the tyrone. If someone encounter the tyrone then they are not sluggish. If someone encounter the zolly then they eat the zolly. If someone snuff the zolly then they are not bifurcated. The tyrone is not sluggish.", "logic": "\nEncounter(tyrone, zolly)\nnot Encounter(zolly, tyrone)\nforall x (Encounter(x, tyrone) -> not Sluggish(x))\nforall x (Encounter(x, zolly) -> Snuff(x, zolly))\nforall x (Snuff(x, zolly) -> not Bifurcated(x))\n\nnot Sluggish(tyrone)\n\nnot Sluggish(tyrone) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The walther sinter the joslyn. The joslyn does not like the walther. If someone sinter the walther then they are not popular. If someone sinter the joslyn then they eat the joslyn. If someone foment the joslyn then they are not estrous. The walther chases the joslyn.", "logic": "\nSinter(walther, joslyn)\nnot Sinter(joslyn, walther)\nforall x (Sinter(x, walther) -> not Popular(x))\nforall x (Sinter(x, joslyn) -> Foment(x, joslyn))\nforall x (Foment(x, joslyn) -> not Estrous(x))\n\nChases(walther, joslyn)\n\nChases(walther, joslyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "Geralda is vernal. Sid is schizoid. Doug is polygenic. Juditha is brindle. All polygenic people are boisterous. Nice people are polygenic. Sid is schizoid.", "logic": "\nVernal(geralda)\nSchizoid(sid)\nPolygenic(doug)\nBrindle(juditha)\nforall x (Polygenic(x) -> Boisterous(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) -> Polygenic(x))\n\nSchizoid(sid)\n\ntherefore Schizoid(sid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Flint is unmarried. Rufus is broadloom. Larine is chummy. Shannah is frigid. All chummy people are specious. Nice people are chummy. Larine is not chummy.", "logic": "\nUnmarried(flint)\nBroadloom(rufus)\nChummy(larine)\nFrigid(shannah)\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Specious(x))\nforall x (Unmarried(x) -> Chummy(x))\n\nnot Chummy(larine)\n\ntherefore Chummy(larine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Lulu is stubborn. Merrie is hydric. Tamarah is abducent. Freda is adopted. All abducent people are gimbaled. Nice people are abducent. Tamarah is gimbaled.", "logic": "\nStubborn(lulu)\nHydric(merrie)\nAbducent(tamarah)\nAdopted(freda)\nforall x (Abducent(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Abducent(x))\n\nGimbaled(tamarah)\n\nAbducent(tamarah) and forall x (Abducent(x) -> Gimbaled(x)) -> therefore Gimbaled(tamarah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Tandi is gloveless. Geoffrey is posh. Peri is heraldic. Ferdinand is restive. All heraldic people are besprent. Nice people are heraldic. Peri is not besprent.", "logic": "\nGloveless(tandi)\nPosh(geoffrey)\nHeraldic(peri)\nRestive(ferdinand)\nforall x (Heraldic(x) -> Besprent(x))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> Heraldic(x))\n\nnot Besprent(peri)\n\nHeraldic(peri) and forall x (Heraldic(x) -> Besprent(x)) -> therefore Besprent(peri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Kirstyn is kokka. Franny is barefoot. Ellissa is diabatic. Trudi is systolic. All diabatic people are nutlike. Nice people are diabatic. Kirstyn is nutlike.", "logic": "\nKokka(kirstyn)\nBarefoot(franny)\nDiabatic(ellissa)\nSystolic(trudi)\nforall x (Diabatic(x) -> Nutlike(x))\nforall x (Kokka(x) -> Diabatic(x))\n\nNutlike(kirstyn)\n\nKokka(kirstyn) and forall x (Kokka(x) -> Diabatic(x)) -> therefore Diabatic(kirstyn) Diabatic(kirstyn) and forall x (Diabatic(x) -> Nutlike(x)) -> therefore Nutlike(kirstyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Lelia is unmanful. Geraldine is apodeictic. Arvy is amebous. Ofella is swank. All amebous people are flukey. Nice people are amebous. Lelia is not flukey.", "logic": "\nUnmanful(lelia)\nApodeictic(geraldine)\nAmebous(arvy)\nSwank(ofella)\nforall x (Amebous(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Unmanful(x) -> Amebous(x))\n\nnot Flukey(lelia)\n\nUnmanful(lelia) and forall x (Unmanful(x) -> Amebous(x)) -> therefore Amebous(lelia) Amebous(lelia) and forall x (Amebous(x) -> Flukey(x)) -> therefore Flukey(lelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Jessalyn is noncyclic. Rozelle is deistic. Jeremy is cespitose. Wilona is stealthy. All cespitose people are soft. Nice people are cespitose. Wilona is not cespitose.", "logic": "\nNoncyclic(jessalyn)\nDeistic(rozelle)\nCespitose(jeremy)\nStealthy(wilona)\nforall x (Cespitose(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Cespitose(x))\n\nnot Cespitose(wilona)\n\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Cespitose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Rochette is asocial. Clifton is besotted. Prudence is untruthful. Verney is resistless. All untruthful people are catatonic. Nice people are untruthful. Verney is catatonic.", "logic": "\nAsocial(rochette)\nBesotted(clifton)\nUntruthful(prudence)\nResistless(verney)\nforall x (Untruthful(x) -> Catatonic(x))\nforall x (Asocial(x) -> Untruthful(x))\n\nCatatonic(verney)\n\nforall x (Untruthful(x) -> Catatonic(x)) <- forall x (Asocial(x) -> Untruthful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Roslyn is electric. Xaviera is sweet. Rochell is scalene. Nesta is bristly. All scalene people are wisplike. Nice people are scalene. Xaviera is not scalene.", "logic": "\nElectric(roslyn)\nSweet(xaviera)\nScalene(rochell)\nBristly(nesta)\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Wisplike(x))\nforall x (Electric(x) -> Scalene(x))\n\nnot Scalene(xaviera)\n\nforall x (Electric(x) -> Scalene(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Jenifer is hearing. Cammie is clogged. Riccardo is cranky. Normie is unwedded. All cranky people are opposed. Nice people are cranky. Jenifer is clogged.", "logic": "\nHearing(jenifer)\nClogged(cammie)\nCranky(riccardo)\nUnwedded(normie)\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> Opposed(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) -> Cranky(x))\n\nClogged(jenifer)\n\nClogged(jenifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Viviana is impudent. Ken is likely. Lottie is listed. Mahmud is impendent. All listed people are ulcerated. Nice people are listed. Mahmud is not green.", "logic": "\nImpudent(viviana)\nLikely(ken)\nListed(lottie)\nImpendent(mahmud)\nforall x (Listed(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Listed(x))\n\nnot Green(mahmud)\n\nnot Green(mahmud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Richardo is hassidic. Humphrey is broadnosed. Sibylle is sane. Clayborn is undigested. All sane people are shrewish. Nice people are sane. Clayborn is hassidic.", "logic": "\nHassidic(richardo)\nBroadnosed(humphrey)\nSane(sibylle)\nUndigested(clayborn)\nforall x (Sane(x) -> Shrewish(x))\nforall x (Hassidic(x) -> Sane(x))\n\nHassidic(clayborn)\n\nHassidic(clayborn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Madel is asyndetic. Madel is first. Madel is blinding. Madel is snoopy. Madel is armoured. Madel is eristical. Madel is prisonlike. Joycelin is asyndetic. Joycelin is first. Joycelin is blinding. Joycelin is snoopy. Joycelin is armoured. Joycelin is eristical. Tansy is first. Tansy is snoopy. Tansy is armoured. All asyndetic people are armoured. Blue people are prisonlike. If Joycelin is snoopy then Joycelin is eristical. Cold people are eristical. If someone is prisonlike and first then they are asyndetic. If someone is first then they are asyndetic. Madel is eristical.", "logic": "\nAsyndetic(madel)\nFirst(madel)\nBlinding(madel)\nSnoopy(madel)\nArmoured(madel)\nEristical(madel)\nPrisonlike(madel)\nAsyndetic(joycelin)\nFirst(joycelin)\nBlinding(joycelin)\nSnoopy(joycelin)\nArmoured(joycelin)\nEristical(joycelin)\nFirst(tansy)\nSnoopy(tansy)\nArmoured(tansy)\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Armoured(x))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nSnoopy(joycelin) -> Eristical(joycelin)\nforall x (First(x) -> Eristical(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) and First(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (First(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\n\nEristical(madel)\n\ntherefore Eristical(madel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "Staffard is flippant. Staffard is soldierly. Staffard is departed. Staffard is pallid. Staffard is uxorious. Staffard is veritable. Staffard is ranging. Rania is flippant. Rania is soldierly. Rania is departed. Rania is pallid. Rania is uxorious. Rania is veritable. Wilber is soldierly. Wilber is pallid. Wilber is uxorious. All flippant people are uxorious. Blue people are ranging. If Rania is pallid then Rania is veritable. Cold people are veritable. If someone is ranging and soldierly then they are flippant. If someone is soldierly then they are flippant. Staffard is not veritable.", "logic": "\nFlippant(staffard)\nSoldierly(staffard)\nDeparted(staffard)\nPallid(staffard)\nUxorious(staffard)\nVeritable(staffard)\nRanging(staffard)\nFlippant(rania)\nSoldierly(rania)\nDeparted(rania)\nPallid(rania)\nUxorious(rania)\nVeritable(rania)\nSoldierly(wilber)\nPallid(wilber)\nUxorious(wilber)\nforall x (Flippant(x) -> Uxorious(x))\nforall x (Flippant(x) -> Ranging(x))\nPallid(rania) -> Veritable(rania)\nforall x (Soldierly(x) -> Veritable(x))\nforall x (Ranging(x) and Soldierly(x) -> Flippant(x))\nforall x (Soldierly(x) -> Flippant(x))\n\nnot Veritable(staffard)\n\ntherefore Veritable(staffard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "Ami is bentonitic. Ami is lobated. Ami is concurrent. Ami is keyless. Ami is calicular. Ami is cranky. Ami is blustery. Ginni is bentonitic. Ginni is lobated. Ginni is concurrent. Ginni is keyless. Ginni is calicular. Ginni is cranky. Sean is lobated. Sean is keyless. Sean is calicular. All bentonitic people are calicular. Blue people are blustery. If Ginni is keyless then Ginni is cranky. Cold people are cranky. If someone is blustery and lobated then they are bentonitic. If someone is lobated then they are bentonitic. Ginni is blustery.", "logic": "\nBentonitic(ami)\nLobated(ami)\nConcurrent(ami)\nKeyless(ami)\nCalicular(ami)\nCranky(ami)\nBlustery(ami)\nBentonitic(ginni)\nLobated(ginni)\nConcurrent(ginni)\nKeyless(ginni)\nCalicular(ginni)\nCranky(ginni)\nLobated(sean)\nKeyless(sean)\nCalicular(sean)\nforall x (Bentonitic(x) -> Calicular(x))\nforall x (Bentonitic(x) -> Blustery(x))\nKeyless(ginni) -> Cranky(ginni)\nforall x (Lobated(x) -> Cranky(x))\nforall x (Blustery(x) and Lobated(x) -> Bentonitic(x))\nforall x (Lobated(x) -> Bentonitic(x))\n\nBlustery(ginni)\n\nBentonitic(ginni) and forall x (Bentonitic(x) -> Blustery(x)) -> therefore Blustery(ginni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "Marcelle is vicenary. Marcelle is unapparent. Marcelle is endermatic. Marcelle is fossilized. Marcelle is thornless. Marcelle is unstarred. Marcelle is terrific. Ephraim is vicenary. Ephraim is unapparent. Ephraim is endermatic. Ephraim is fossilized. Ephraim is thornless. Ephraim is unstarred. Beth is unapparent. Beth is fossilized. Beth is thornless. All vicenary people are thornless. Blue people are terrific. If Ephraim is fossilized then Ephraim is unstarred. Cold people are unstarred. If someone is terrific and unapparent then they are vicenary. If someone is unapparent then they are vicenary. Beth is not vicenary.", "logic": "\nVicenary(marcelle)\nUnapparent(marcelle)\nEndermatic(marcelle)\nFossilized(marcelle)\nThornless(marcelle)\nUnstarred(marcelle)\nTerrific(marcelle)\nVicenary(ephraim)\nUnapparent(ephraim)\nEndermatic(ephraim)\nFossilized(ephraim)\nThornless(ephraim)\nUnstarred(ephraim)\nUnapparent(beth)\nFossilized(beth)\nThornless(beth)\nforall x (Vicenary(x) -> Thornless(x))\nforall x (Vicenary(x) -> Terrific(x))\nFossilized(ephraim) -> Unstarred(ephraim)\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Terrific(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Vicenary(x))\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> Vicenary(x))\n\nnot Vicenary(beth)\n\nUnapparent(beth) and forall x (Unapparent(x) -> Vicenary(x)) -> therefore Vicenary(beth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "Shlomo is lowborn. Shlomo is hydroxy. Shlomo is unanswered. Shlomo is unrelieved. Shlomo is ameboid. Shlomo is cytotoxic. Shlomo is rental. Kenna is lowborn. Kenna is hydroxy. Kenna is unanswered. Kenna is unrelieved. Kenna is ameboid. Kenna is cytotoxic. Romonda is hydroxy. Romonda is unrelieved. Romonda is ameboid. All lowborn people are ameboid. Blue people are rental. If Kenna is unrelieved then Kenna is cytotoxic. Cold people are cytotoxic. If someone is rental and hydroxy then they are lowborn. If someone is hydroxy then they are lowborn. Romonda is rental.", "logic": "\nLowborn(shlomo)\nHydroxy(shlomo)\nUnanswered(shlomo)\nUnrelieved(shlomo)\nAmeboid(shlomo)\nCytotoxic(shlomo)\nRental(shlomo)\nLowborn(kenna)\nHydroxy(kenna)\nUnanswered(kenna)\nUnrelieved(kenna)\nAmeboid(kenna)\nCytotoxic(kenna)\nHydroxy(romonda)\nUnrelieved(romonda)\nAmeboid(romonda)\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Ameboid(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Rental(x))\nUnrelieved(kenna) -> Cytotoxic(kenna)\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Rental(x) and Hydroxy(x) -> Lowborn(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Lowborn(x))\n\nRental(romonda)\n\nHydroxy(romonda) and forall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Lowborn(x)) -> therefore Lowborn(romonda) Lowborn(romonda) and forall x (Lowborn(x) -> Rental(x)) -> therefore Rental(romonda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "Thatch is degraded. Thatch is awninged. Thatch is unglazed. Thatch is forgetful. Thatch is biblical. Thatch is numerable. Thatch is defoliated. Morlee is degraded. Morlee is awninged. Morlee is unglazed. Morlee is forgetful. Morlee is biblical. Morlee is numerable. Maxfield is awninged. Maxfield is forgetful. Maxfield is biblical. All degraded people are biblical. Blue people are defoliated. If Morlee is forgetful then Morlee is numerable. Cold people are numerable. If someone is defoliated and awninged then they are degraded. If someone is awninged then they are degraded. Maxfield is not defoliated.", "logic": "\nDegraded(thatch)\nAwninged(thatch)\nUnglazed(thatch)\nForgetful(thatch)\nBiblical(thatch)\nNumerable(thatch)\nDefoliated(thatch)\nDegraded(morlee)\nAwninged(morlee)\nUnglazed(morlee)\nForgetful(morlee)\nBiblical(morlee)\nNumerable(morlee)\nAwninged(maxfield)\nForgetful(maxfield)\nBiblical(maxfield)\nforall x (Degraded(x) -> Biblical(x))\nforall x (Degraded(x) -> Defoliated(x))\nForgetful(morlee) -> Numerable(morlee)\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Defoliated(x) and Awninged(x) -> Degraded(x))\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Degraded(x))\n\nnot Defoliated(maxfield)\n\nAwninged(maxfield) and forall x (Awninged(x) -> Degraded(x)) -> therefore Degraded(maxfield) Degraded(maxfield) and forall x (Degraded(x) -> Defoliated(x)) -> therefore Defoliated(maxfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The wood transform the hester. The wood is yeasty. The wood slew the hester. The wood gybe the hester. The hester is phonemic. The hester does not like the wood. The hester gybe the wood. If someone transform the wood and the wood does not like the hester then they are phonemic. If someone slew the wood then they are phonemic. If someone slew the wood and they chase the hester then they do not chase the wood. If someone slew the hester then they like the wood. If someone transform the wood and the wood is appetising then they chase the hester. If someone transform the wood then they chase the hester. If someone slew the wood then the wood is not appetising. If someone transform the hester and they are yeasty then they visit the wood. The hester does not like the wood.", "logic": "\nTransform(wood, hester)\nYeasty(wood)\nSlew(wood, hester)\nGybe(wood, hester)\nPhonemic(hester)\nnot Slew(hester, wood)\nGybe(hester, wood)\nforall x (Transform(x, wood) and not Slew(wood, hester) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Slew(x, wood) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Slew(x, wood) and Transform(x, hester) -> not Transform(x, wood))\nforall x (Slew(x, hester) -> Slew(x, wood))\nforall x (Transform(x, wood) and Appetising(wood) -> Transform(x, hester))\nforall x (Transform(x, wood) -> Transform(x, hester))\nforall x (Slew(x, wood) -> not Appetising(wood))\nforall x (Transform(x, hester) and Yeasty(x) -> Gybe(x, wood))\n\nnot Slew(hester, wood)\n\ntherefore not Slew(hester, wood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The leesa scuff the luelle. The leesa is ultimo. The leesa distemper the luelle. The leesa environ the luelle. The luelle is pectinate. The luelle does not like the leesa. The luelle environ the leesa. If someone scuff the leesa and the leesa does not like the luelle then they are pectinate. If someone distemper the leesa then they are pectinate. If someone distemper the leesa and they chase the luelle then they do not chase the leesa. If someone distemper the luelle then they like the leesa. If someone scuff the leesa and the leesa is unmolested then they chase the luelle. If someone scuff the leesa then they chase the luelle. If someone distemper the leesa then the leesa is not unmolested. If someone scuff the luelle and they are ultimo then they visit the leesa. The luelle does not visit the leesa.", "logic": "\nScuff(leesa, luelle)\nUltimo(leesa)\nDistemper(leesa, luelle)\nEnviron(leesa, luelle)\nPectinate(luelle)\nnot Distemper(luelle, leesa)\nEnviron(luelle, leesa)\nforall x (Scuff(x, leesa) and not Distemper(leesa, luelle) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Distemper(x, leesa) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Distemper(x, leesa) and Scuff(x, luelle) -> not Scuff(x, leesa))\nforall x (Distemper(x, luelle) -> Distemper(x, leesa))\nforall x (Scuff(x, leesa) and Unmolested(leesa) -> Scuff(x, luelle))\nforall x (Scuff(x, leesa) -> Scuff(x, luelle))\nforall x (Distemper(x, leesa) -> not Unmolested(leesa))\nforall x (Scuff(x, luelle) and Ultimo(x) -> Environ(x, leesa))\n\nnot Environ(luelle, leesa)\n\ntherefore Environ(luelle, leesa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The gratia glorify the bertina. The gratia is aldermanly. The gratia precede the bertina. The gratia craunch the bertina. The bertina is terrific. The bertina does not like the gratia. The bertina craunch the gratia. If someone glorify the gratia and the gratia does not like the bertina then they are terrific. If someone precede the gratia then they are terrific. If someone precede the gratia and they chase the bertina then they do not chase the gratia. If someone precede the bertina then they like the gratia. If someone glorify the gratia and the gratia is volant then they chase the bertina. If someone glorify the gratia then they chase the bertina. If someone precede the gratia then the gratia is not volant. If someone glorify the bertina and they are aldermanly then they visit the gratia. The gratia craunch the gratia.", "logic": "\nGlorify(gratia, bertina)\nAldermanly(gratia)\nPrecede(gratia, bertina)\nCraunch(gratia, bertina)\nTerrific(bertina)\nnot Precede(bertina, gratia)\nCraunch(bertina, gratia)\nforall x (Glorify(x, gratia) and not Precede(gratia, bertina) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Precede(x, gratia) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Precede(x, gratia) and Glorify(x, bertina) -> not Glorify(x, gratia))\nforall x (Precede(x, bertina) -> Precede(x, gratia))\nforall x (Glorify(x, gratia) and Volant(gratia) -> Glorify(x, bertina))\nforall x (Glorify(x, gratia) -> Glorify(x, bertina))\nforall x (Precede(x, gratia) -> not Volant(gratia))\nforall x (Glorify(x, bertina) and Aldermanly(x) -> Craunch(x, gratia))\n\nCraunch(gratia, gratia)\n\nGlorify(gratia, bertina) and Aldermanly(gratia) and forall x (Glorify(x, bertina) and Aldermanly(x) -> Craunch(x, gratia)) -> therefore Craunch(gratia, gratia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The ange brachiate the effie. The ange is stinging. The ange pleat the effie. The ange form the effie. The effie is receivable. The effie does not like the ange. The effie form the ange. If someone brachiate the ange and the ange does not like the effie then they are receivable. If someone pleat the ange then they are receivable. If someone pleat the ange and they chase the effie then they do not chase the ange. If someone pleat the effie then they like the ange. If someone brachiate the ange and the ange is arrhythmic then they chase the effie. If someone brachiate the ange then they chase the effie. If someone pleat the ange then the ange is not arrhythmic. If someone brachiate the effie and they are stinging then they visit the ange. The ange does not visit the ange.", "logic": "\nBrachiate(ange, effie)\nStinging(ange)\nPleat(ange, effie)\nForm(ange, effie)\nReceivable(effie)\nnot Pleat(effie, ange)\nForm(effie, ange)\nforall x (Brachiate(x, ange) and not Pleat(ange, effie) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Pleat(x, ange) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Pleat(x, ange) and Brachiate(x, effie) -> not Brachiate(x, ange))\nforall x (Pleat(x, effie) -> Pleat(x, ange))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, ange) and Arrhythmic(ange) -> Brachiate(x, effie))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, ange) -> Brachiate(x, effie))\nforall x (Pleat(x, ange) -> not Arrhythmic(ange))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, effie) and Stinging(x) -> Form(x, ange))\n\nnot Form(ange, ange)\n\nBrachiate(ange, effie) and Stinging(ange) and forall x (Brachiate(x, effie) and Stinging(x) -> Form(x, ange)) -> therefore Form(ange, ange)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The eugine nettle the alan. The eugine is chinless. The eugine ruggedise the alan. The eugine slander the alan. The alan is sweeping. The alan does not like the eugine. The alan slander the eugine. If someone nettle the eugine and the eugine does not like the alan then they are sweeping. If someone ruggedise the eugine then they are sweeping. If someone ruggedise the eugine and they chase the alan then they do not chase the eugine. If someone ruggedise the alan then they like the eugine. If someone nettle the eugine and the eugine is wesleyan then they chase the alan. If someone nettle the eugine then they chase the alan. If someone ruggedise the eugine then the eugine is not wesleyan. If someone nettle the alan and they are chinless then they visit the eugine. The eugine is not wesleyan.", "logic": "\nNettle(eugine, alan)\nChinless(eugine)\nRuggedise(eugine, alan)\nSlander(eugine, alan)\nSweeping(alan)\nnot Ruggedise(alan, eugine)\nSlander(alan, eugine)\nforall x (Nettle(x, eugine) and not Ruggedise(eugine, alan) -> Sweeping(x))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, eugine) -> Sweeping(x))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, eugine) and Nettle(x, alan) -> not Nettle(x, eugine))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, alan) -> Ruggedise(x, eugine))\nforall x (Nettle(x, eugine) and Wesleyan(eugine) -> Nettle(x, alan))\nforall x (Nettle(x, eugine) -> Nettle(x, alan))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, eugine) -> not Wesleyan(eugine))\nforall x (Nettle(x, alan) and Chinless(x) -> Slander(x, eugine))\n\nnot Wesleyan(eugine)\n\nRuggedise(eugine, alan) and forall x (Ruggedise(x, alan) -> Ruggedise(x, eugine)) -> therefore Ruggedise(eugine, eugine) Ruggedise(eugine, eugine) and forall x (Ruggedise(x, eugine) -> not Wesleyan(eugine)) -> therefore not Wesleyan(eugine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The lotty vowelize the edi. The lotty is addicted. The lotty snuff the edi. The lotty mint the edi. The edi is dislocated. The edi does not like the lotty. The edi mint the lotty. If someone vowelize the lotty and the lotty does not like the edi then they are dislocated. If someone snuff the lotty then they are dislocated. If someone snuff the lotty and they chase the edi then they do not chase the lotty. If someone snuff the edi then they like the lotty. If someone vowelize the lotty and the lotty is opaline then they chase the edi. If someone vowelize the lotty then they chase the edi. If someone snuff the lotty then the lotty is not opaline. If someone vowelize the edi and they are addicted then they visit the lotty. The lotty is opaline.", "logic": "\nVowelize(lotty, edi)\nAddicted(lotty)\nSnuff(lotty, edi)\nMint(lotty, edi)\nDislocated(edi)\nnot Snuff(edi, lotty)\nMint(edi, lotty)\nforall x (Vowelize(x, lotty) and not Snuff(lotty, edi) -> Dislocated(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x, lotty) -> Dislocated(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x, lotty) and Vowelize(x, edi) -> not Vowelize(x, lotty))\nforall x (Snuff(x, edi) -> Snuff(x, lotty))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, lotty) and Opaline(lotty) -> Vowelize(x, edi))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, lotty) -> Vowelize(x, edi))\nforall x (Snuff(x, lotty) -> not Opaline(lotty))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, edi) and Addicted(x) -> Mint(x, lotty))\n\nOpaline(lotty)\n\nSnuff(lotty, edi) and forall x (Snuff(x, edi) -> Snuff(x, lotty)) -> therefore Snuff(lotty, lotty) Snuff(lotty, lotty) and forall x (Snuff(x, lotty) -> not Opaline(lotty)) -> therefore not Opaline(lotty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The maris dispute the kimberly. The maris is adsorbent. The maris neighbour the kimberly. The maris rendezvous the kimberly. The kimberly is highbrowed. The kimberly does not like the maris. The kimberly rendezvous the maris. If someone dispute the maris and the maris does not like the kimberly then they are highbrowed. If someone neighbour the maris then they are highbrowed. If someone neighbour the maris and they chase the kimberly then they do not chase the maris. If someone neighbour the kimberly then they like the maris. If someone dispute the maris and the maris is darkling then they chase the kimberly. If someone dispute the maris then they chase the kimberly. If someone neighbour the maris then the maris is not darkling. If someone dispute the kimberly and they are adsorbent then they visit the maris. The kimberly does not chase the kimberly.", "logic": "\nDispute(maris, kimberly)\nAdsorbent(maris)\nNeighbour(maris, kimberly)\nRendezvous(maris, kimberly)\nHighbrowed(kimberly)\nnot Neighbour(kimberly, maris)\nRendezvous(kimberly, maris)\nforall x (Dispute(x, maris) and not Neighbour(maris, kimberly) -> Highbrowed(x))\nforall x (Neighbour(x, maris) -> Highbrowed(x))\nforall x (Neighbour(x, maris) and Dispute(x, kimberly) -> not Dispute(x, maris))\nforall x (Neighbour(x, kimberly) -> Neighbour(x, maris))\nforall x (Dispute(x, maris) and Darkling(maris) -> Dispute(x, kimberly))\nforall x (Dispute(x, maris) -> Dispute(x, kimberly))\nforall x (Neighbour(x, maris) -> not Darkling(maris))\nforall x (Dispute(x, kimberly) and Adsorbent(x) -> Rendezvous(x, maris))\n\nnot Dispute(kimberly, kimberly)\n\nforall x (Dispute(x, maris) and Darkling(maris) -> Dispute(x, kimberly)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The dorene bemock the cecelia. The dorene is regardful. The dorene permeate the cecelia. The dorene groak the cecelia. The cecelia is refined. The cecelia does not like the dorene. The cecelia groak the dorene. If someone bemock the dorene and the dorene does not like the cecelia then they are refined. If someone permeate the dorene then they are refined. If someone permeate the dorene and they chase the cecelia then they do not chase the dorene. If someone permeate the cecelia then they like the dorene. If someone bemock the dorene and the dorene is tannic then they chase the cecelia. If someone bemock the dorene then they chase the cecelia. If someone permeate the dorene then the dorene is not tannic. If someone bemock the cecelia and they are regardful then they visit the dorene. The cecelia permeate the cecelia.", "logic": "\nBemock(dorene, cecelia)\nRegardful(dorene)\nPermeate(dorene, cecelia)\nGroak(dorene, cecelia)\nRefined(cecelia)\nnot Permeate(cecelia, dorene)\nGroak(cecelia, dorene)\nforall x (Bemock(x, dorene) and not Permeate(dorene, cecelia) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Permeate(x, dorene) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Permeate(x, dorene) and Bemock(x, cecelia) -> not Bemock(x, dorene))\nforall x (Permeate(x, cecelia) -> Permeate(x, dorene))\nforall x (Bemock(x, dorene) and Tannic(dorene) -> Bemock(x, cecelia))\nforall x (Bemock(x, dorene) -> Bemock(x, cecelia))\nforall x (Permeate(x, dorene) -> not Tannic(dorene))\nforall x (Bemock(x, cecelia) and Regardful(x) -> Groak(x, dorene))\n\nPermeate(cecelia, cecelia)\n\nPermeate(cecelia, cecelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The cob insolate the sibeal. The cob is meatless. The cob defat the sibeal. The cob wheedle the sibeal. The sibeal is alchemic. The sibeal does not like the cob. The sibeal wheedle the cob. If someone insolate the cob and the cob does not like the sibeal then they are alchemic. If someone defat the cob then they are alchemic. If someone defat the cob and they chase the sibeal then they do not chase the cob. If someone defat the sibeal then they like the cob. If someone insolate the cob and the cob is renegade then they chase the sibeal. If someone insolate the cob then they chase the sibeal. If someone defat the cob then the cob is not renegade. If someone insolate the sibeal and they are meatless then they visit the cob. The sibeal is not renegade.", "logic": "\nInsolate(cob, sibeal)\nMeatless(cob)\nDefat(cob, sibeal)\nWheedle(cob, sibeal)\nAlchemic(sibeal)\nnot Defat(sibeal, cob)\nWheedle(sibeal, cob)\nforall x (Insolate(x, cob) and not Defat(cob, sibeal) -> Alchemic(x))\nforall x (Defat(x, cob) -> Alchemic(x))\nforall x (Defat(x, cob) and Insolate(x, sibeal) -> not Insolate(x, cob))\nforall x (Defat(x, sibeal) -> Defat(x, cob))\nforall x (Insolate(x, cob) and Renegade(cob) -> Insolate(x, sibeal))\nforall x (Insolate(x, cob) -> Insolate(x, sibeal))\nforall x (Defat(x, cob) -> not Renegade(cob))\nforall x (Insolate(x, sibeal) and Meatless(x) -> Wheedle(x, cob))\n\nnot Renegade(sibeal)\n\nnot Renegade(sibeal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The ilysa rick the ginny. The ilysa is disgraced. The ilysa schuss the ginny. The ilysa louden the ginny. The ginny is anabiotic. The ginny does not like the ilysa. The ginny louden the ilysa. If someone rick the ilysa and the ilysa does not like the ginny then they are anabiotic. If someone schuss the ilysa then they are anabiotic. If someone schuss the ilysa and they chase the ginny then they do not chase the ilysa. If someone schuss the ginny then they like the ilysa. If someone rick the ilysa and the ilysa is taking then they chase the ginny. If someone rick the ilysa then they chase the ginny. If someone schuss the ilysa then the ilysa is not taking. If someone rick the ginny and they are disgraced then they visit the ilysa. The ilysa is kind.", "logic": "\nRick(ilysa, ginny)\nDisgraced(ilysa)\nSchuss(ilysa, ginny)\nLouden(ilysa, ginny)\nAnabiotic(ginny)\nnot Schuss(ginny, ilysa)\nLouden(ginny, ilysa)\nforall x (Rick(x, ilysa) and not Schuss(ilysa, ginny) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Schuss(x, ilysa) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Schuss(x, ilysa) and Rick(x, ginny) -> not Rick(x, ilysa))\nforall x (Schuss(x, ginny) -> Schuss(x, ilysa))\nforall x (Rick(x, ilysa) and Taking(ilysa) -> Rick(x, ginny))\nforall x (Rick(x, ilysa) -> Rick(x, ginny))\nforall x (Schuss(x, ilysa) -> not Taking(ilysa))\nforall x (Rick(x, ginny) and Disgraced(x) -> Louden(x, ilysa))\n\nKind(ilysa)\n\nKind(ilysa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The demetria advertize the gratia. The demetria is frisian. The demetria right the gratia. The demetria broadcast the gratia. The gratia is unrelaxed. The gratia does not like the demetria. The gratia broadcast the demetria. If someone advertize the demetria and the demetria does not like the gratia then they are unrelaxed. If someone right the demetria then they are unrelaxed. If someone right the demetria and they chase the gratia then they do not chase the demetria. If someone right the gratia then they like the demetria. If someone advertize the demetria and the demetria is snug then they chase the gratia. If someone advertize the demetria then they chase the gratia. If someone right the demetria then the demetria is not snug. If someone advertize the gratia and they are frisian then they visit the demetria. The demetria is not blue.", "logic": "\nAdvertize(demetria, gratia)\nFrisian(demetria)\nRight(demetria, gratia)\nBroadcast(demetria, gratia)\nUnrelaxed(gratia)\nnot Right(gratia, demetria)\nBroadcast(gratia, demetria)\nforall x (Advertize(x, demetria) and not Right(demetria, gratia) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Right(x, demetria) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Right(x, demetria) and Advertize(x, gratia) -> not Advertize(x, demetria))\nforall x (Right(x, gratia) -> Right(x, demetria))\nforall x (Advertize(x, demetria) and Snug(demetria) -> Advertize(x, gratia))\nforall x (Advertize(x, demetria) -> Advertize(x, gratia))\nforall x (Right(x, demetria) -> not Snug(demetria))\nforall x (Advertize(x, gratia) and Frisian(x) -> Broadcast(x, demetria))\n\nnot Blue(demetria)\n\nnot Blue(demetria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "The maynord clamour the rey. The maynord is cadaveric. The maynord discommode the rey. The maynord retaliate the rey. The rey is uncoerced. The rey does not like the maynord. The rey retaliate the maynord. If someone clamour the maynord and the maynord does not like the rey then they are uncoerced. If someone discommode the maynord then they are uncoerced. If someone discommode the maynord and they chase the rey then they do not chase the maynord. If someone discommode the rey then they like the maynord. If someone clamour the maynord and the maynord is ominous then they chase the rey. If someone clamour the maynord then they chase the rey. If someone discommode the maynord then the maynord is not ominous. If someone clamour the rey and they are cadaveric then they visit the maynord. The rey retaliate the rey.", "logic": "\nClamour(maynord, rey)\nCadaveric(maynord)\nDiscommode(maynord, rey)\nRetaliate(maynord, rey)\nUncoerced(rey)\nnot Discommode(rey, maynord)\nRetaliate(rey, maynord)\nforall x (Clamour(x, maynord) and not Discommode(maynord, rey) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Discommode(x, maynord) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Discommode(x, maynord) and Clamour(x, rey) -> not Clamour(x, maynord))\nforall x (Discommode(x, rey) -> Discommode(x, maynord))\nforall x (Clamour(x, maynord) and Ominous(maynord) -> Clamour(x, rey))\nforall x (Clamour(x, maynord) -> Clamour(x, rey))\nforall x (Discommode(x, maynord) -> not Ominous(maynord))\nforall x (Clamour(x, rey) and Cadaveric(x) -> Retaliate(x, maynord))\n\nRetaliate(rey, rey)\n\nRetaliate(rey, rey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-202"} {"premises": "Bill is diurnal. Bill is unstressed. Bill is utter. All unstressed, utter people are diclinous. All dissenting, vapourous people are diestrual. Blue people are dissenting. Nice people are diclinous. If Bill is unstressed then Bill is diclinous. If someone is vapourous and diestrual then they are diurnal. Bill is utter.", "logic": "\nDiurnal(bill)\nUnstressed(bill)\nUtter(bill)\nforall x (Unstressed(x) and Utter(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) -> Dissenting(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nUnstressed(bill) -> Diclinous(bill)\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and Diestrual(x) -> Diurnal(x))\n\nUtter(bill)\n\ntherefore Utter(bill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Brody is lunate. Brody is reluctant. Brody is thwartwise. All reluctant, thwartwise people are unarmored. All nasty, sectional people are nisi. Blue people are nasty. Nice people are unarmored. If Brody is reluctant then Brody is unarmored. If someone is sectional and nisi then they are lunate. Brody is not reluctant.", "logic": "\nLunate(brody)\nReluctant(brody)\nThwartwise(brody)\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and Thwartwise(x) -> Unarmored(x))\nforall x (Nasty(x) and Sectional(x) -> Nisi(x))\nforall x (Unarmored(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Thwartwise(x) -> Unarmored(x))\nReluctant(brody) -> Unarmored(brody)\nforall x (Sectional(x) and Nisi(x) -> Lunate(x))\n\nnot Reluctant(brody)\n\ntherefore Reluctant(brody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Katha is reportable. Katha is eatable. Katha is couchant. All eatable, couchant people are vexing. All unheeded, whacky people are carefree. Blue people are unheeded. Nice people are vexing. If Katha is eatable then Katha is vexing. If someone is whacky and carefree then they are reportable. Katha is vexing.", "logic": "\nReportable(katha)\nEatable(katha)\nCouchant(katha)\nforall x (Eatable(x) and Couchant(x) -> Vexing(x))\nforall x (Unheeded(x) and Whacky(x) -> Carefree(x))\nforall x (Vexing(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Couchant(x) -> Vexing(x))\nEatable(katha) -> Vexing(katha)\nforall x (Whacky(x) and Carefree(x) -> Reportable(x))\n\nVexing(katha)\n\nEatable(katha) and Eatable(katha) -> Vexing(katha) -> therefore Vexing(katha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Alisha is boffo. Alisha is unwary. Alisha is select. All unwary, select people are windblown. All flightless, shona people are broadside. Blue people are flightless. Nice people are windblown. If Alisha is unwary then Alisha is windblown. If someone is shona and broadside then they are boffo. Alisha is not windblown.", "logic": "\nBoffo(alisha)\nUnwary(alisha)\nSelect(alisha)\nforall x (Unwary(x) and Select(x) -> Windblown(x))\nforall x (Flightless(x) and Shona(x) -> Broadside(x))\nforall x (Windblown(x) -> Flightless(x))\nforall x (Select(x) -> Windblown(x))\nUnwary(alisha) -> Windblown(alisha)\nforall x (Shona(x) and Broadside(x) -> Boffo(x))\n\nnot Windblown(alisha)\n\nUnwary(alisha) and Unwary(alisha) -> Windblown(alisha) -> therefore Windblown(alisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Dara is elongate. Dara is turkish. Dara is nuclear. All turkish, nuclear people are dreaded. All prime, honest people are gilt. Blue people are prime. Nice people are dreaded. If Dara is turkish then Dara is dreaded. If someone is honest and gilt then they are elongate. Dara is prime.", "logic": "\nElongate(dara)\nTurkish(dara)\nNuclear(dara)\nforall x (Turkish(x) and Nuclear(x) -> Dreaded(x))\nforall x (Prime(x) and Honest(x) -> Gilt(x))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Nuclear(x) -> Dreaded(x))\nTurkish(dara) -> Dreaded(dara)\nforall x (Honest(x) and Gilt(x) -> Elongate(x))\n\nPrime(dara)\n\nTurkish(dara) and Turkish(dara) -> Dreaded(dara) -> therefore Dreaded(dara) Dreaded(dara) and forall x (Dreaded(x) -> Prime(x)) -> therefore Prime(dara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Leonelle is hydraulic. Leonelle is gilled. Leonelle is slighting. All gilled, slighting people are heuristic. All ratable, motivated people are hiemal. Blue people are ratable. Nice people are heuristic. If Leonelle is gilled then Leonelle is heuristic. If someone is motivated and hiemal then they are hydraulic. Leonelle is not ratable.", "logic": "\nHydraulic(leonelle)\nGilled(leonelle)\nSlighting(leonelle)\nforall x (Gilled(x) and Slighting(x) -> Heuristic(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) and Motivated(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Heuristic(x) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Slighting(x) -> Heuristic(x))\nGilled(leonelle) -> Heuristic(leonelle)\nforall x (Motivated(x) and Hiemal(x) -> Hydraulic(x))\n\nnot Ratable(leonelle)\n\nGilled(leonelle) and Gilled(leonelle) -> Heuristic(leonelle) -> therefore Heuristic(leonelle) Heuristic(leonelle) and forall x (Heuristic(x) -> Ratable(x)) -> therefore Ratable(leonelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Lois is vague. Lois is terrible. Lois is recorded. All terrible, recorded people are peregrine. All reserved, aberrant people are spiritous. Blue people are reserved. Nice people are peregrine. If Lois is terrible then Lois is peregrine. If someone is aberrant and spiritous then they are vague. Lois is not spiritous.", "logic": "\nVague(lois)\nTerrible(lois)\nRecorded(lois)\nforall x (Terrible(x) and Recorded(x) -> Peregrine(x))\nforall x (Reserved(x) and Aberrant(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Recorded(x) -> Peregrine(x))\nTerrible(lois) -> Peregrine(lois)\nforall x (Aberrant(x) and Spiritous(x) -> Vague(x))\n\nnot Spiritous(lois)\n\nforall x (Reserved(x) and Aberrant(x) -> Spiritous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Johanna is ochre. Johanna is altissimo. Johanna is disarming. All altissimo, disarming people are antonymous. All intricate, strangled people are occidental. Blue people are intricate. Nice people are antonymous. If Johanna is altissimo then Johanna is antonymous. If someone is strangled and occidental then they are ochre. Johanna is strangled.", "logic": "\nOchre(johanna)\nAltissimo(johanna)\nDisarming(johanna)\nforall x (Altissimo(x) and Disarming(x) -> Antonymous(x))\nforall x (Intricate(x) and Strangled(x) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Antonymous(x) -> Intricate(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Antonymous(x))\nAltissimo(johanna) -> Antonymous(johanna)\nforall x (Strangled(x) and Occidental(x) -> Ochre(x))\n\nStrangled(johanna)\n\nStrangled(johanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Adelaide is parietal. Adelaide is bronzy. Adelaide is weepy. Adelaide is wrathful. Adelaide is thai. Adelaide is clxx. Xenos is wrathful. Calhoun is bronzy. Calhoun is weepy. Calhoun is wrathful. Calhoun is not cxlv. Meggan is parietal. Meggan is weepy. Meggan is wrathful. Meggan is cxlv. Meggan is thai. If something is wrathful and parietal then it is thai. All bronzy things are parietal. Meggan is thai.", "logic": "\nParietal(adelaide)\nBronzy(adelaide)\nWeepy(adelaide)\nWrathful(adelaide)\nThai(adelaide)\nClxx(adelaide)\nWrathful(xenos)\nBronzy(calhoun)\nWeepy(calhoun)\nWrathful(calhoun)\nnot Cxlv(calhoun)\nParietal(meggan)\nWeepy(meggan)\nWrathful(meggan)\nCxlv(meggan)\nThai(meggan)\nforall x (Wrathful(x) and Parietal(x) -> Thai(x))\nforall x (Bronzy(x) -> Parietal(x))\n\nThai(meggan)\n\ntherefore Thai(meggan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Oscar is primed. Oscar is umptieth. Oscar is mucinous. Oscar is defective. Oscar is handleless. Oscar is iron. Jens is defective. Kandy is umptieth. Kandy is mucinous. Kandy is defective. Kandy is not deathless. Chaim is primed. Chaim is mucinous. Chaim is defective. Chaim is deathless. Chaim is handleless. If something is defective and primed then it is handleless. All umptieth things are primed. Oscar is not defective.", "logic": "\nPrimed(oscar)\nUmptieth(oscar)\nMucinous(oscar)\nDefective(oscar)\nHandleless(oscar)\nIron(oscar)\nDefective(jens)\nUmptieth(kandy)\nMucinous(kandy)\nDefective(kandy)\nnot Deathless(kandy)\nPrimed(chaim)\nMucinous(chaim)\nDefective(chaim)\nDeathless(chaim)\nHandleless(chaim)\nforall x (Defective(x) and Primed(x) -> Handleless(x))\nforall x (Umptieth(x) -> Primed(x))\n\nnot Defective(oscar)\n\ntherefore Defective(oscar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Orsa is cannular. Orsa is atomic. Orsa is flukey. Orsa is accoutred. Orsa is acold. Orsa is donnean. Cammie is accoutred. Agnesse is atomic. Agnesse is flukey. Agnesse is accoutred. Agnesse is not northbound. Deanne is cannular. Deanne is flukey. Deanne is accoutred. Deanne is northbound. Deanne is acold. If something is accoutred and cannular then it is acold. All atomic things are cannular. Agnesse is cannular.", "logic": "\nCannular(orsa)\nAtomic(orsa)\nFlukey(orsa)\nAccoutred(orsa)\nAcold(orsa)\nDonnean(orsa)\nAccoutred(cammie)\nAtomic(agnesse)\nFlukey(agnesse)\nAccoutred(agnesse)\nnot Northbound(agnesse)\nCannular(deanne)\nFlukey(deanne)\nAccoutred(deanne)\nNorthbound(deanne)\nAcold(deanne)\nforall x (Accoutred(x) and Cannular(x) -> Acold(x))\nforall x (Atomic(x) -> Cannular(x))\n\nCannular(agnesse)\n\nAtomic(agnesse) and forall x (Atomic(x) -> Cannular(x)) -> therefore Cannular(agnesse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Daphene is bolivian. Daphene is denotive. Daphene is completed. Daphene is grecian. Daphene is aphasic. Daphene is astute. Roslyn is grecian. Stephen is denotive. Stephen is completed. Stephen is grecian. Stephen is not urgent. Augie is bolivian. Augie is completed. Augie is grecian. Augie is urgent. Augie is aphasic. If something is grecian and bolivian then it is aphasic. All denotive things are bolivian. Stephen is not bolivian.", "logic": "\nBolivian(daphene)\nDenotive(daphene)\nCompleted(daphene)\nGrecian(daphene)\nAphasic(daphene)\nAstute(daphene)\nGrecian(roslyn)\nDenotive(stephen)\nCompleted(stephen)\nGrecian(stephen)\nnot Urgent(stephen)\nBolivian(augie)\nCompleted(augie)\nGrecian(augie)\nUrgent(augie)\nAphasic(augie)\nforall x (Grecian(x) and Bolivian(x) -> Aphasic(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) -> Bolivian(x))\n\nnot Bolivian(stephen)\n\nDenotive(stephen) and forall x (Denotive(x) -> Bolivian(x)) -> therefore Bolivian(stephen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Emmie is tipsy. Emmie is rousseauan. Emmie is vesical. Emmie is bulgy. Emmie is leftist. Emmie is nonmoving. Darth is bulgy. Lauryn is rousseauan. Lauryn is vesical. Lauryn is bulgy. Lauryn is not bitter. Tilda is tipsy. Tilda is vesical. Tilda is bulgy. Tilda is bitter. Tilda is leftist. If something is bulgy and tipsy then it is leftist. All rousseauan things are tipsy. Lauryn is leftist.", "logic": "\nTipsy(emmie)\nRousseauan(emmie)\nVesical(emmie)\nBulgy(emmie)\nLeftist(emmie)\nNonmoving(emmie)\nBulgy(darth)\nRousseauan(lauryn)\nVesical(lauryn)\nBulgy(lauryn)\nnot Bitter(lauryn)\nTipsy(tilda)\nVesical(tilda)\nBulgy(tilda)\nBitter(tilda)\nLeftist(tilda)\nforall x (Bulgy(x) and Tipsy(x) -> Leftist(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Tipsy(x))\n\nLeftist(lauryn)\n\nRousseauan(lauryn) and forall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Tipsy(x)) -> therefore Tipsy(lauryn) Bulgy(lauryn) and Tipsy(lauryn) and forall x (Bulgy(x) and Tipsy(x) -> Leftist(x)) -> therefore Leftist(lauryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Jeannine is albuminous. Jeannine is sometime. Jeannine is highbrow. Jeannine is seismal. Jeannine is unmusical. Jeannine is canny. Matthaeus is seismal. Felicio is sometime. Felicio is highbrow. Felicio is seismal. Felicio is not powered. Garv is albuminous. Garv is highbrow. Garv is seismal. Garv is powered. Garv is unmusical. If something is seismal and albuminous then it is unmusical. All sometime things are albuminous. Felicio is not unmusical.", "logic": "\nAlbuminous(jeannine)\nSometime(jeannine)\nHighbrow(jeannine)\nSeismal(jeannine)\nUnmusical(jeannine)\nCanny(jeannine)\nSeismal(matthaeus)\nSometime(felicio)\nHighbrow(felicio)\nSeismal(felicio)\nnot Powered(felicio)\nAlbuminous(garv)\nHighbrow(garv)\nSeismal(garv)\nPowered(garv)\nUnmusical(garv)\nforall x (Seismal(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Unmusical(x))\nforall x (Sometime(x) -> Albuminous(x))\n\nnot Unmusical(felicio)\n\nSometime(felicio) and forall x (Sometime(x) -> Albuminous(x)) -> therefore Albuminous(felicio) Seismal(felicio) and Albuminous(felicio) and forall x (Seismal(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Unmusical(x)) -> therefore Unmusical(felicio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Gayle is tabu. Gayle is gaelic. Gayle is spurned. Gayle is uttermost. Gayle is untwisted. Gayle is weeping. Alidia is uttermost. Jammie is gaelic. Jammie is spurned. Jammie is uttermost. Jammie is not thumbed. Mareah is tabu. Mareah is spurned. Mareah is uttermost. Mareah is thumbed. Mareah is untwisted. If something is uttermost and tabu then it is untwisted. All gaelic things are tabu. Alidia is not tabu.", "logic": "\nTabu(gayle)\nGaelic(gayle)\nSpurned(gayle)\nUttermost(gayle)\nUntwisted(gayle)\nWeeping(gayle)\nUttermost(alidia)\nGaelic(jammie)\nSpurned(jammie)\nUttermost(jammie)\nnot Thumbed(jammie)\nTabu(mareah)\nSpurned(mareah)\nUttermost(mareah)\nThumbed(mareah)\nUntwisted(mareah)\nforall x (Uttermost(x) and Tabu(x) -> Untwisted(x))\nforall x (Gaelic(x) -> Tabu(x))\n\nnot Tabu(alidia)\n\nforall x (Gaelic(x) -> Tabu(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Angil is buttery. Angil is better. Angil is unrelated. Angil is leaden. Angil is acetous. Angil is aseptic. Dionis is leaden. Aeriel is better. Aeriel is unrelated. Aeriel is leaden. Aeriel is not calendric. Davis is buttery. Davis is unrelated. Davis is leaden. Davis is calendric. Davis is acetous. If something is leaden and buttery then it is acetous. All better things are buttery. Dionis is acetous.", "logic": "\nButtery(angil)\nBetter(angil)\nUnrelated(angil)\nLeaden(angil)\nAcetous(angil)\nAseptic(angil)\nLeaden(dionis)\nBetter(aeriel)\nUnrelated(aeriel)\nLeaden(aeriel)\nnot Calendric(aeriel)\nButtery(davis)\nUnrelated(davis)\nLeaden(davis)\nCalendric(davis)\nAcetous(davis)\nforall x (Leaden(x) and Buttery(x) -> Acetous(x))\nforall x (Better(x) -> Buttery(x))\n\nAcetous(dionis)\n\nforall x (Leaden(x) and Buttery(x) -> Acetous(x)) <- forall x (Better(x) -> Buttery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Missy is blithe. Missy is oldline. Missy is analytical. Missy is mechanised. Missy is apraxic. Missy is vascular. Lynne is mechanised. Aurelia is oldline. Aurelia is analytical. Aurelia is mechanised. Aurelia is not systematic. Dulci is blithe. Dulci is analytical. Dulci is mechanised. Dulci is systematic. Dulci is apraxic. If something is mechanised and blithe then it is apraxic. All oldline things are blithe. Dulci is not oldline.", "logic": "\nBlithe(missy)\nOldline(missy)\nAnalytical(missy)\nMechanised(missy)\nApraxic(missy)\nVascular(missy)\nMechanised(lynne)\nOldline(aurelia)\nAnalytical(aurelia)\nMechanised(aurelia)\nnot Systematic(aurelia)\nBlithe(dulci)\nAnalytical(dulci)\nMechanised(dulci)\nSystematic(dulci)\nApraxic(dulci)\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and Blithe(x) -> Apraxic(x))\nforall x (Oldline(x) -> Blithe(x))\n\nnot Oldline(dulci)\n\nnot Oldline(dulci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Rudy is tannish. Rudy is trackless. Rudy is unsociable. Rudy is tailed. Rudy is deferent. Rudy is headfirst. Daren is tailed. Susanetta is trackless. Susanetta is unsociable. Susanetta is tailed. Susanetta is not prying. Holly is tannish. Holly is unsociable. Holly is tailed. Holly is prying. Holly is deferent. If something is tailed and tannish then it is deferent. All trackless things are tannish. Daren is prying.", "logic": "\nTannish(rudy)\nTrackless(rudy)\nUnsociable(rudy)\nTailed(rudy)\nDeferent(rudy)\nHeadfirst(rudy)\nTailed(daren)\nTrackless(susanetta)\nUnsociable(susanetta)\nTailed(susanetta)\nnot Prying(susanetta)\nTannish(holly)\nUnsociable(holly)\nTailed(holly)\nPrying(holly)\nDeferent(holly)\nforall x (Tailed(x) and Tannish(x) -> Deferent(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) -> Tannish(x))\n\nPrying(daren)\n\nPrying(daren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Kelcey is formulaic. Kelcey is glowing. Kelcey is peaceful. Kelcey is painterly. Kelcey is fastidious. Kelcey is bowfront. Leila is painterly. Binnie is glowing. Binnie is peaceful. Binnie is painterly. Binnie is not ergotropic. Vilma is formulaic. Vilma is peaceful. Vilma is painterly. Vilma is ergotropic. Vilma is fastidious. If something is painterly and formulaic then it is fastidious. All glowing things are formulaic. Binnie is not bowfront.", "logic": "\nFormulaic(kelcey)\nGlowing(kelcey)\nPeaceful(kelcey)\nPainterly(kelcey)\nFastidious(kelcey)\nBowfront(kelcey)\nPainterly(leila)\nGlowing(binnie)\nPeaceful(binnie)\nPainterly(binnie)\nnot Ergotropic(binnie)\nFormulaic(vilma)\nPeaceful(vilma)\nPainterly(vilma)\nErgotropic(vilma)\nFastidious(vilma)\nforall x (Painterly(x) and Formulaic(x) -> Fastidious(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Formulaic(x))\n\nnot Bowfront(binnie)\n\nnot Bowfront(binnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Arly is clxv. Arly is megascopic. Arly is anaerobic. Arly is monocled. Arly is budding. Arly is unworldly. Bridgette is monocled. Jilli is megascopic. Jilli is anaerobic. Jilli is monocled. Jilli is not opulent. Jenilee is clxv. Jenilee is anaerobic. Jenilee is monocled. Jenilee is opulent. Jenilee is budding. If something is monocled and clxv then it is budding. All megascopic things are clxv. Jenilee is unworldly.", "logic": "\nClxv(arly)\nMegascopic(arly)\nAnaerobic(arly)\nMonocled(arly)\nBudding(arly)\nUnworldly(arly)\nMonocled(bridgette)\nMegascopic(jilli)\nAnaerobic(jilli)\nMonocled(jilli)\nnot Opulent(jilli)\nClxv(jenilee)\nAnaerobic(jenilee)\nMonocled(jenilee)\nOpulent(jenilee)\nBudding(jenilee)\nforall x (Monocled(x) and Clxv(x) -> Budding(x))\nforall x (Megascopic(x) -> Clxv(x))\n\nUnworldly(jenilee)\n\nUnworldly(jenilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-629"} {"premises": "Venkat is soviet. Venkat is irritative. Venkat is not muffled. Venkat is pianistic. Ingaborg is soviet. Ingaborg is canine. Ingaborg is wasteful. If something is pianistic then it is wasteful. If something is wasteful then it is canine. Venkat is pianistic.", "logic": "\nSoviet(venkat)\nIrritative(venkat)\nnot Muffled(venkat)\nPianistic(venkat)\nSoviet(ingaborg)\nCanine(ingaborg)\nWasteful(ingaborg)\nforall x (Pianistic(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Canine(x))\n\nPianistic(venkat)\n\ntherefore Pianistic(venkat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Milly is agitated. Milly is puzzling. Milly is not smashing. Milly is little. Rivkah is agitated. Rivkah is watercress. Rivkah is apropos. If something is little then it is apropos. If something is apropos then it is watercress. Rivkah is not apropos.", "logic": "\nAgitated(milly)\nPuzzling(milly)\nnot Smashing(milly)\nLittle(milly)\nAgitated(rivkah)\nWatercress(rivkah)\nApropos(rivkah)\nforall x (Little(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Watercress(x))\n\nnot Apropos(rivkah)\n\ntherefore Apropos(rivkah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Harrison is gimbaled. Harrison is ingrained. Harrison is not sheepish. Harrison is coexistent. Wat is gimbaled. Wat is truncated. Wat is trashy. If something is coexistent then it is trashy. If something is trashy then it is truncated. Harrison is trashy.", "logic": "\nGimbaled(harrison)\nIngrained(harrison)\nnot Sheepish(harrison)\nCoexistent(harrison)\nGimbaled(wat)\nTruncated(wat)\nTrashy(wat)\nforall x (Coexistent(x) -> Trashy(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) -> Truncated(x))\n\nTrashy(harrison)\n\nCoexistent(harrison) and forall x (Coexistent(x) -> Trashy(x)) -> therefore Trashy(harrison)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Ximenes is straight. Ximenes is reentrant. Ximenes is not lxiii. Ximenes is edited. Elbertina is straight. Elbertina is hidden. Elbertina is dreary. If something is edited then it is dreary. If something is dreary then it is hidden. Ximenes is not dreary.", "logic": "\nStraight(ximenes)\nReentrant(ximenes)\nnot Lxiii(ximenes)\nEdited(ximenes)\nStraight(elbertina)\nHidden(elbertina)\nDreary(elbertina)\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Dreary(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) -> Hidden(x))\n\nnot Dreary(ximenes)\n\nEdited(ximenes) and forall x (Edited(x) -> Dreary(x)) -> therefore Dreary(ximenes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Cassandry is oratorical. Cassandry is stratified. Cassandry is not centrical. Cassandry is markovian. Garcia is oratorical. Garcia is lxxxi. Garcia is tallish. If something is markovian then it is tallish. If something is tallish then it is lxxxi. Cassandry is lxxxi.", "logic": "\nOratorical(cassandry)\nStratified(cassandry)\nnot Centrical(cassandry)\nMarkovian(cassandry)\nOratorical(garcia)\nLxxxi(garcia)\nTallish(garcia)\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Tallish(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Lxxxi(x))\n\nLxxxi(cassandry)\n\nMarkovian(cassandry) and forall x (Markovian(x) -> Tallish(x)) -> therefore Tallish(cassandry) Tallish(cassandry) and forall x (Tallish(x) -> Lxxxi(x)) -> therefore Lxxxi(cassandry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Marlee is homosexual. Marlee is sizzling. Marlee is not fictitious. Marlee is unavailing. Matthaeus is homosexual. Matthaeus is barehanded. Matthaeus is airworthy. If something is unavailing then it is airworthy. If something is airworthy then it is barehanded. Marlee is not barehanded.", "logic": "\nHomosexual(marlee)\nSizzling(marlee)\nnot Fictitious(marlee)\nUnavailing(marlee)\nHomosexual(matthaeus)\nBarehanded(matthaeus)\nAirworthy(matthaeus)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Airworthy(x))\nforall x (Airworthy(x) -> Barehanded(x))\n\nnot Barehanded(marlee)\n\nUnavailing(marlee) and forall x (Unavailing(x) -> Airworthy(x)) -> therefore Airworthy(marlee) Airworthy(marlee) and forall x (Airworthy(x) -> Barehanded(x)) -> therefore Barehanded(marlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Jen is level. Jen is matched. Jen is not biramous. Jen is possessed. Prasun is level. Prasun is satiny. Prasun is elevated. If something is possessed then it is elevated. If something is elevated then it is satiny. Prasun is not matched.", "logic": "\nLevel(jen)\nMatched(jen)\nnot Biramous(jen)\nPossessed(jen)\nLevel(prasun)\nSatiny(prasun)\nElevated(prasun)\nforall x (Possessed(x) -> Elevated(x))\nforall x (Elevated(x) -> Satiny(x))\n\nnot Matched(prasun)\n\nnot Matched(prasun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Bertie is harassed. Bertie is beneficed. Bertie is not reborn. Bertie is stingy. Chelsae is harassed. Chelsae is sociable. Chelsae is epicyclic. If something is stingy then it is epicyclic. If something is epicyclic then it is sociable. Chelsae is stingy.", "logic": "\nHarassed(bertie)\nBeneficed(bertie)\nnot Reborn(bertie)\nStingy(bertie)\nHarassed(chelsae)\nSociable(chelsae)\nEpicyclic(chelsae)\nforall x (Stingy(x) -> Epicyclic(x))\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) -> Sociable(x))\n\nStingy(chelsae)\n\nStingy(chelsae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Dabney is weary. Dabney is scabrous. Dabney is not populated. Dabney is spotty. Roland is weary. Roland is condylar. Roland is crusted. If something is spotty then it is crusted. If something is crusted then it is condylar. Dabney is not red.", "logic": "\nWeary(dabney)\nScabrous(dabney)\nnot Populated(dabney)\nSpotty(dabney)\nWeary(roland)\nCondylar(roland)\nCrusted(roland)\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Crusted(x))\nforall x (Crusted(x) -> Condylar(x))\n\nnot Red(dabney)\n\nnot Red(dabney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Wald is inhumane. Wald is sadducean. Wald is not descending. Wald is arid. Darby is inhumane. Darby is glinting. Darby is atypical. If something is arid then it is atypical. If something is atypical then it is glinting. Darby is red.", "logic": "\nInhumane(wald)\nSadducean(wald)\nnot Descending(wald)\nArid(wald)\nInhumane(darby)\nGlinting(darby)\nAtypical(darby)\nforall x (Arid(x) -> Atypical(x))\nforall x (Atypical(x) -> Glinting(x))\n\nRed(darby)\n\nRed(darby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Henrieta is orbitual. Henrieta is insurable. Mirella is improvable. Mirella is sideways. Mirella is not sandy. Mirella is insurable. Mirella is not whitened. Arlene is improvable. Arlene is not sideways. Arlene is not insurable. Arlene is dented. Tabina is improvable. Tabina is sideways. Tabina is insurable. Tabina is whitened. If something is whitened then it is sideways. If something is dented and not improvable then it is sideways. If something is whitened then it is dented. Big, insurable things are sandy. If Henrieta is not insurable then Henrieta is not sideways. All dented things are orbitual. Henrieta is orbitual.", "logic": "\nOrbitual(henrieta)\nInsurable(henrieta)\nImprovable(mirella)\nSideways(mirella)\nnot Sandy(mirella)\nInsurable(mirella)\nnot Whitened(mirella)\nImprovable(arlene)\nnot Sideways(arlene)\nnot Insurable(arlene)\nDented(arlene)\nImprovable(tabina)\nSideways(tabina)\nInsurable(tabina)\nWhitened(tabina)\nforall x (Whitened(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) and not Improvable(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Whitened(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) and Insurable(x) -> Sandy(x))\nnot Insurable(henrieta) -> not Sideways(henrieta)\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Orbitual(x))\n\nOrbitual(henrieta)\n\ntherefore Orbitual(henrieta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Gilda is linnean. Gilda is eristic. Minnie is lowbred. Minnie is craved. Minnie is not spumy. Minnie is eristic. Minnie is not subliminal. Jemmy is lowbred. Jemmy is not craved. Jemmy is not eristic. Jemmy is ripened. Kellsie is lowbred. Kellsie is craved. Kellsie is eristic. Kellsie is subliminal. If something is subliminal then it is craved. If something is ripened and not lowbred then it is craved. If something is subliminal then it is ripened. Big, eristic things are spumy. If Gilda is not eristic then Gilda is not craved. All ripened things are linnean. Jemmy is craved.", "logic": "\nLinnean(gilda)\nEristic(gilda)\nLowbred(minnie)\nCraved(minnie)\nnot Spumy(minnie)\nEristic(minnie)\nnot Subliminal(minnie)\nLowbred(jemmy)\nnot Craved(jemmy)\nnot Eristic(jemmy)\nRipened(jemmy)\nLowbred(kellsie)\nCraved(kellsie)\nEristic(kellsie)\nSubliminal(kellsie)\nforall x (Subliminal(x) -> Craved(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) and not Lowbred(x) -> Craved(x))\nforall x (Subliminal(x) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) and Eristic(x) -> Spumy(x))\nnot Eristic(gilda) -> not Craved(gilda)\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Linnean(x))\n\nCraved(jemmy)\n\ntherefore not Craved(jemmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Christen is propellent. Christen is future. Martha is jutting. Martha is squarish. Martha is not unshackled. Martha is future. Martha is not applicable. Sibley is jutting. Sibley is not squarish. Sibley is not future. Sibley is cartesian. Antonin is jutting. Antonin is squarish. Antonin is future. Antonin is applicable. If something is applicable then it is squarish. If something is cartesian and not jutting then it is squarish. If something is applicable then it is cartesian. Big, future things are unshackled. If Christen is not future then Christen is not squarish. All cartesian things are propellent. Christen is unshackled.", "logic": "\nPropellent(christen)\nFuture(christen)\nJutting(martha)\nSquarish(martha)\nnot Unshackled(martha)\nFuture(martha)\nnot Applicable(martha)\nJutting(sibley)\nnot Squarish(sibley)\nnot Future(sibley)\nCartesian(sibley)\nJutting(antonin)\nSquarish(antonin)\nFuture(antonin)\nApplicable(antonin)\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Squarish(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) and not Jutting(x) -> Squarish(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Future(x) -> Unshackled(x))\nnot Future(christen) -> not Squarish(christen)\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Propellent(x))\n\nUnshackled(christen)\n\nPropellent(christen) and Future(christen) and forall x (Propellent(x) and Future(x) -> Unshackled(x)) -> therefore Unshackled(christen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Tobe is purulent. Tobe is unrealised. Jobi is plotted. Jobi is awake. Jobi is not jailed. Jobi is unrealised. Jobi is not inhalant. Lemmie is plotted. Lemmie is not awake. Lemmie is not unrealised. Lemmie is brushy. Xylina is plotted. Xylina is awake. Xylina is unrealised. Xylina is inhalant. If something is inhalant then it is awake. If something is brushy and not plotted then it is awake. If something is inhalant then it is brushy. Big, unrealised things are jailed. If Tobe is not unrealised then Tobe is not awake. All brushy things are purulent. Xylina is not brushy.", "logic": "\nPurulent(tobe)\nUnrealised(tobe)\nPlotted(jobi)\nAwake(jobi)\nnot Jailed(jobi)\nUnrealised(jobi)\nnot Inhalant(jobi)\nPlotted(lemmie)\nnot Awake(lemmie)\nnot Unrealised(lemmie)\nBrushy(lemmie)\nPlotted(xylina)\nAwake(xylina)\nUnrealised(xylina)\nInhalant(xylina)\nforall x (Inhalant(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Brushy(x) and not Plotted(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Inhalant(x) -> Brushy(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Unrealised(x) -> Jailed(x))\nnot Unrealised(tobe) -> not Awake(tobe)\nforall x (Brushy(x) -> Purulent(x))\n\nnot Brushy(xylina)\n\nInhalant(xylina) and forall x (Inhalant(x) -> Brushy(x)) -> therefore Brushy(xylina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Kipp is winless. Kipp is stimulated. Allene is farming. Allene is walleyed. Allene is not curious. Allene is stimulated. Allene is not fictional. Christof is farming. Christof is not walleyed. Christof is not stimulated. Christof is unkept. Dulci is farming. Dulci is walleyed. Dulci is stimulated. Dulci is fictional. If something is fictional then it is walleyed. If something is unkept and not farming then it is walleyed. If something is fictional then it is unkept. Big, stimulated things are curious. If Kipp is not stimulated then Kipp is not walleyed. All unkept things are winless. Dulci is winless.", "logic": "\nWinless(kipp)\nStimulated(kipp)\nFarming(allene)\nWalleyed(allene)\nnot Curious(allene)\nStimulated(allene)\nnot Fictional(allene)\nFarming(christof)\nnot Walleyed(christof)\nnot Stimulated(christof)\nUnkept(christof)\nFarming(dulci)\nWalleyed(dulci)\nStimulated(dulci)\nFictional(dulci)\nforall x (Fictional(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) and not Farming(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Fictional(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) and Stimulated(x) -> Curious(x))\nnot Stimulated(kipp) -> not Walleyed(kipp)\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Winless(x))\n\nWinless(dulci)\n\nFictional(dulci) and forall x (Fictional(x) -> Unkept(x)) -> therefore Unkept(dulci) Unkept(dulci) and forall x (Unkept(x) -> Winless(x)) -> therefore Winless(dulci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Genni is floccose. Genni is unartistic. Sigmund is amended. Sigmund is uncool. Sigmund is not winking. Sigmund is unartistic. Sigmund is not bossy. Marietta is amended. Marietta is not uncool. Marietta is not unartistic. Marietta is tubercular. Egbert is amended. Egbert is uncool. Egbert is unartistic. Egbert is bossy. If something is bossy then it is uncool. If something is tubercular and not amended then it is uncool. If something is bossy then it is tubercular. Big, unartistic things are winking. If Genni is not unartistic then Genni is not uncool. All tubercular things are floccose. Egbert is not floccose.", "logic": "\nFloccose(genni)\nUnartistic(genni)\nAmended(sigmund)\nUncool(sigmund)\nnot Winking(sigmund)\nUnartistic(sigmund)\nnot Bossy(sigmund)\nAmended(marietta)\nnot Uncool(marietta)\nnot Unartistic(marietta)\nTubercular(marietta)\nAmended(egbert)\nUncool(egbert)\nUnartistic(egbert)\nBossy(egbert)\nforall x (Bossy(x) -> Uncool(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) and not Amended(x) -> Uncool(x))\nforall x (Bossy(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Floccose(x) and Unartistic(x) -> Winking(x))\nnot Unartistic(genni) -> not Uncool(genni)\nforall x (Tubercular(x) -> Floccose(x))\n\nnot Floccose(egbert)\n\nBossy(egbert) and forall x (Bossy(x) -> Tubercular(x)) -> therefore Tubercular(egbert) Tubercular(egbert) and forall x (Tubercular(x) -> Floccose(x)) -> therefore Floccose(egbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Rodrique is accurst. Rodrique is jungian. Dorette is unmannered. Dorette is forficate. Dorette is not tenacious. Dorette is jungian. Dorette is not ghostly. Sayre is unmannered. Sayre is not forficate. Sayre is not jungian. Sayre is biaural. Toby is unmannered. Toby is forficate. Toby is jungian. Toby is ghostly. If something is ghostly then it is forficate. If something is biaural and not unmannered then it is forficate. If something is ghostly then it is biaural. Big, jungian things are tenacious. If Rodrique is not jungian then Rodrique is not forficate. All biaural things are accurst. Rodrique is not biaural.", "logic": "\nAccurst(rodrique)\nJungian(rodrique)\nUnmannered(dorette)\nForficate(dorette)\nnot Tenacious(dorette)\nJungian(dorette)\nnot Ghostly(dorette)\nUnmannered(sayre)\nnot Forficate(sayre)\nnot Jungian(sayre)\nBiaural(sayre)\nUnmannered(toby)\nForficate(toby)\nJungian(toby)\nGhostly(toby)\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) and not Unmannered(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (Accurst(x) and Jungian(x) -> Tenacious(x))\nnot Jungian(rodrique) -> not Forficate(rodrique)\nforall x (Biaural(x) -> Accurst(x))\n\nnot Biaural(rodrique)\n\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Biaural(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Welbie is unshackled. Welbie is referent. Alexi is nauruan. Alexi is further. Alexi is not shitless. Alexi is referent. Alexi is not shrewish. Zaria is nauruan. Zaria is not further. Zaria is not referent. Zaria is indexless. Celestina is nauruan. Celestina is further. Celestina is referent. Celestina is shrewish. If something is shrewish then it is further. If something is indexless and not nauruan then it is further. If something is shrewish then it is indexless. Big, referent things are shitless. If Welbie is not referent then Welbie is not further. All indexless things are unshackled. Alexi is unshackled.", "logic": "\nUnshackled(welbie)\nReferent(welbie)\nNauruan(alexi)\nFurther(alexi)\nnot Shitless(alexi)\nReferent(alexi)\nnot Shrewish(alexi)\nNauruan(zaria)\nnot Further(zaria)\nnot Referent(zaria)\nIndexless(zaria)\nNauruan(celestina)\nFurther(celestina)\nReferent(celestina)\nShrewish(celestina)\nforall x (Shrewish(x) -> Further(x))\nforall x (Indexless(x) and not Nauruan(x) -> Further(x))\nforall x (Shrewish(x) -> Indexless(x))\nforall x (Unshackled(x) and Referent(x) -> Shitless(x))\nnot Referent(welbie) -> not Further(welbie)\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Unshackled(x))\n\nUnshackled(alexi)\n\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Unshackled(x)) <- forall x (Shrewish(x) -> Indexless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Thibaut is calm. Thibaut is antepartum. Art is smoking. Art is glorious. Art is not ecuadorian. Art is antepartum. Art is not nonionised. Wallis is smoking. Wallis is not glorious. Wallis is not antepartum. Wallis is tardy. Doralyn is smoking. Doralyn is glorious. Doralyn is antepartum. Doralyn is nonionised. If something is nonionised then it is glorious. If something is tardy and not smoking then it is glorious. If something is nonionised then it is tardy. Big, antepartum things are ecuadorian. If Thibaut is not antepartum then Thibaut is not glorious. All tardy things are calm. Art is not tardy.", "logic": "\nCalm(thibaut)\nAntepartum(thibaut)\nSmoking(art)\nGlorious(art)\nnot Ecuadorian(art)\nAntepartum(art)\nnot Nonionised(art)\nSmoking(wallis)\nnot Glorious(wallis)\nnot Antepartum(wallis)\nTardy(wallis)\nSmoking(doralyn)\nGlorious(doralyn)\nAntepartum(doralyn)\nNonionised(doralyn)\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Tardy(x) and not Smoking(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Tardy(x))\nforall x (Calm(x) and Antepartum(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\nnot Antepartum(thibaut) -> not Glorious(thibaut)\nforall x (Tardy(x) -> Calm(x))\n\nnot Tardy(art)\n\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Tardy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Leeanne is anecdotic. Leeanne is allover. Filippa is peruked. Filippa is nicaraguan. Filippa is not undone. Filippa is allover. Filippa is not ingrowing. Dalton is peruked. Dalton is not nicaraguan. Dalton is not allover. Dalton is breakable. Lenny is peruked. Lenny is nicaraguan. Lenny is allover. Lenny is ingrowing. If something is ingrowing then it is nicaraguan. If something is breakable and not peruked then it is nicaraguan. If something is ingrowing then it is breakable. Big, allover things are undone. If Leeanne is not allover then Leeanne is not nicaraguan. All breakable things are anecdotic. Leeanne is ingrowing.", "logic": "\nAnecdotic(leeanne)\nAllover(leeanne)\nPeruked(filippa)\nNicaraguan(filippa)\nnot Undone(filippa)\nAllover(filippa)\nnot Ingrowing(filippa)\nPeruked(dalton)\nnot Nicaraguan(dalton)\nnot Allover(dalton)\nBreakable(dalton)\nPeruked(lenny)\nNicaraguan(lenny)\nAllover(lenny)\nIngrowing(lenny)\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Nicaraguan(x))\nforall x (Breakable(x) and not Peruked(x) -> Nicaraguan(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Breakable(x))\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) and Allover(x) -> Undone(x))\nnot Allover(leeanne) -> not Nicaraguan(leeanne)\nforall x (Breakable(x) -> Anecdotic(x))\n\nIngrowing(leeanne)\n\nIngrowing(leeanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Lloyd is extensible. Lloyd is dosed. Shelley is centesimal. Shelley is jittering. Shelley is not palpable. Shelley is dosed. Shelley is not faulty. Roxanne is centesimal. Roxanne is not jittering. Roxanne is not dosed. Roxanne is impulsive. Keslie is centesimal. Keslie is jittering. Keslie is dosed. Keslie is faulty. If something is faulty then it is jittering. If something is impulsive and not centesimal then it is jittering. If something is faulty then it is impulsive. Big, dosed things are palpable. If Lloyd is not dosed then Lloyd is not jittering. All impulsive things are extensible. Roxanne is not faulty.", "logic": "\nExtensible(lloyd)\nDosed(lloyd)\nCentesimal(shelley)\nJittering(shelley)\nnot Palpable(shelley)\nDosed(shelley)\nnot Faulty(shelley)\nCentesimal(roxanne)\nnot Jittering(roxanne)\nnot Dosed(roxanne)\nImpulsive(roxanne)\nCentesimal(keslie)\nJittering(keslie)\nDosed(keslie)\nFaulty(keslie)\nforall x (Faulty(x) -> Jittering(x))\nforall x (Impulsive(x) and not Centesimal(x) -> Jittering(x))\nforall x (Faulty(x) -> Impulsive(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) and Dosed(x) -> Palpable(x))\nnot Dosed(lloyd) -> not Jittering(lloyd)\nforall x (Impulsive(x) -> Extensible(x))\n\nnot Faulty(roxanne)\n\nnot Faulty(roxanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Anastasie is petty. Anastasie is nonionised. Larina is unpunctual. Larina is unspotted. Larina is not permutable. Larina is nonionised. Larina is not rending. Tracee is unpunctual. Tracee is not unspotted. Tracee is not nonionised. Tracee is polygynous. Marylou is unpunctual. Marylou is unspotted. Marylou is nonionised. Marylou is rending. If something is rending then it is unspotted. If something is polygynous and not unpunctual then it is unspotted. If something is rending then it is polygynous. Big, nonionised things are permutable. If Anastasie is not nonionised then Anastasie is not unspotted. All polygynous things are petty. Anastasie is unpunctual.", "logic": "\nPetty(anastasie)\nNonionised(anastasie)\nUnpunctual(larina)\nUnspotted(larina)\nnot Permutable(larina)\nNonionised(larina)\nnot Rending(larina)\nUnpunctual(tracee)\nnot Unspotted(tracee)\nnot Nonionised(tracee)\nPolygynous(tracee)\nUnpunctual(marylou)\nUnspotted(marylou)\nNonionised(marylou)\nRending(marylou)\nforall x (Rending(x) -> Unspotted(x))\nforall x (Polygynous(x) and not Unpunctual(x) -> Unspotted(x))\nforall x (Rending(x) -> Polygynous(x))\nforall x (Petty(x) and Nonionised(x) -> Permutable(x))\nnot Nonionised(anastasie) -> not Unspotted(anastasie)\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> Petty(x))\n\nUnpunctual(anastasie)\n\nUnpunctual(anastasie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-417"} {"premises": "Taddeus is planned. Taddeus is igneous. Taddeus is tuberous. Cold things are not awless. If something is ecuadorian and not planned then it is masked. If something is planned and igneous then it is masked. Red things are masked. All masked things are ecuadorian. If something is planned then it is igneous. If something is masked then it is tuberous. If something is igneous and not awless then it is tuberous. Taddeus is planned.", "logic": "\nPlanned(taddeus)\nIgneous(taddeus)\nTuberous(taddeus)\nforall x (Planned(x) -> not Awless(x))\nforall x (Ecuadorian(x) and not Planned(x) -> Masked(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) and Igneous(x) -> Masked(x))\nforall x (Preset(x) -> Masked(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) -> Igneous(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) -> Tuberous(x))\nforall x (Igneous(x) and not Awless(x) -> Tuberous(x))\n\nPlanned(taddeus)\n\ntherefore Planned(taddeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-446"} {"premises": "Honey is delusory. Honey is homocercal. Honey is unremedied. Cold things are not subnormal. If something is hapless and not delusory then it is ukrainian. If something is delusory and homocercal then it is ukrainian. Red things are ukrainian. All ukrainian things are hapless. If something is delusory then it is homocercal. If something is ukrainian then it is unremedied. If something is homocercal and not subnormal then it is unremedied. Honey is not delusory.", "logic": "\nDelusory(honey)\nHomocercal(honey)\nUnremedied(honey)\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> not Subnormal(x))\nforall x (Hapless(x) and not Delusory(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) and Homocercal(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Stripped(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Hapless(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Unremedied(x))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) and not Subnormal(x) -> Unremedied(x))\n\nnot Delusory(honey)\n\ntherefore Delusory(honey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-446"} {"premises": "Jakob is ablative. Jakob is juvenile. Jakob is serpentine. Cold things are not admired. If something is iatrogenic and not ablative then it is bondable. If something is ablative and juvenile then it is bondable. Red things are bondable. All bondable things are iatrogenic. If something is ablative then it is juvenile. If something is bondable then it is serpentine. If something is juvenile and not admired then it is serpentine. Jakob is bondable.", "logic": "\nAblative(jakob)\nJuvenile(jakob)\nSerpentine(jakob)\nforall x (Ablative(x) -> not Admired(x))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) and not Ablative(x) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Ablative(x) and Juvenile(x) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Bondable(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nforall x (Ablative(x) -> Juvenile(x))\nforall x (Bondable(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) and not Admired(x) -> Serpentine(x))\n\nBondable(jakob)\n\nAblative(jakob) and Juvenile(jakob) and forall x (Ablative(x) and Juvenile(x) -> Bondable(x)) -> therefore Bondable(jakob)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-446"} {"premises": "Maria is limitless. Maria is chesty. Maria is unfriendly. Cold things are not snuggled. If something is marketable and not limitless then it is tufted. If something is limitless and chesty then it is tufted. Red things are tufted. All tufted things are marketable. If something is limitless then it is chesty. If something is tufted then it is unfriendly. If something is chesty and not snuggled then it is unfriendly. Maria is snuggled.", "logic": "\nLimitless(maria)\nChesty(maria)\nUnfriendly(maria)\nforall x (Limitless(x) -> not Snuggled(x))\nforall x (Marketable(x) and not Limitless(x) -> Tufted(x))\nforall x (Limitless(x) and Chesty(x) -> Tufted(x))\nforall x (Most(x) -> Tufted(x))\nforall x (Tufted(x) -> Marketable(x))\nforall x (Limitless(x) -> Chesty(x))\nforall x (Tufted(x) -> Unfriendly(x))\nforall x (Chesty(x) and not Snuggled(x) -> Unfriendly(x))\n\nSnuggled(maria)\n\nLimitless(maria) and forall x (Limitless(x) -> not Snuggled(x)) -> therefore not Snuggled(maria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-446"} {"premises": "Elysia is mailed. Elysia is mortal. Elysia is surprised. Cold things are not worst. If something is defeasible and not mailed then it is ternate. If something is mailed and mortal then it is ternate. Red things are ternate. All ternate things are defeasible. If something is mailed then it is mortal. If something is ternate then it is surprised. If something is mortal and not worst then it is surprised. Elysia is defeasible.", "logic": "\nMailed(elysia)\nMortal(elysia)\nSurprised(elysia)\nforall x (Mailed(x) -> not Worst(x))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and not Mailed(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Mailed(x) and Mortal(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Allogamous(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Ternate(x) -> Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Mailed(x) -> Mortal(x))\nforall x (Ternate(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) and not Worst(x) -> Surprised(x))\n\nDefeasible(elysia)\n\nMailed(elysia) and Mortal(elysia) and forall x (Mailed(x) and Mortal(x) -> Ternate(x)) -> therefore Ternate(elysia) Ternate(elysia) and forall x (Ternate(x) -> Defeasible(x)) -> therefore Defeasible(elysia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-446"} {"premises": "Denna is disposed. Denna is bipolar. Denna is filled. Cold things are not spectral. If something is destroyed and not disposed then it is shitless. If something is disposed and bipolar then it is shitless. Red things are shitless. All shitless things are destroyed. If something is disposed then it is bipolar. If something is shitless then it is filled. If something is bipolar and not spectral then it is filled. Denna is not destroyed.", "logic": "\nDisposed(denna)\nBipolar(denna)\nFilled(denna)\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> not Spectral(x))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) and not Disposed(x) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Bipolar(x) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Overawed(x) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Destroyed(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> Bipolar(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Filled(x))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) and not Spectral(x) -> Filled(x))\n\nnot Destroyed(denna)\n\nDisposed(denna) and Bipolar(denna) and forall x (Disposed(x) and Bipolar(x) -> Shitless(x)) -> therefore Shitless(denna) Shitless(denna) and forall x (Shitless(x) -> Destroyed(x)) -> therefore Destroyed(denna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-446"} {"premises": "Ardine is creaseless. Ardine is attendant. Ardine is unstinting. Ardine is beamy. Christin is attendant. Christin is bracteate. Kimberlee is spacious. Kimberlee is derisive. Kimberlee is attendant. Kimberlee is bracteate. Blue people are unstinting. Round, derisive people are spacious. All spacious, attendant people are bracteate. Big, bracteate people are spacious. White people are unstinting. Green people are unstinting. If Ardine is beamy then Ardine is creaseless. Red, beamy people are spacious. Christin is attendant.", "logic": "\nCreaseless(ardine)\nAttendant(ardine)\nUnstinting(ardine)\nBeamy(ardine)\nAttendant(christin)\nBracteate(christin)\nSpacious(kimberlee)\nDerisive(kimberlee)\nAttendant(kimberlee)\nBracteate(kimberlee)\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nforall x (Bracteate(x) and Derisive(x) -> Spacious(x))\nforall x (Spacious(x) and Attendant(x) -> Bracteate(x))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) and Bracteate(x) -> Spacious(x))\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nforall x (Attendant(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nBeamy(ardine) -> Creaseless(ardine)\nforall x (Unstinting(x) and Beamy(x) -> Spacious(x))\n\nAttendant(christin)\n\ntherefore Attendant(christin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Sutton is ascensive. Sutton is pushy. Sutton is idolised. Sutton is earless. Ailey is pushy. Ailey is palatable. Ethelred is embryonic. Ethelred is tyrolean. Ethelred is pushy. Ethelred is palatable. Blue people are idolised. Round, tyrolean people are embryonic. All embryonic, pushy people are palatable. Big, palatable people are embryonic. White people are idolised. Green people are idolised. If Sutton is earless then Sutton is ascensive. Red, earless people are embryonic. Ethelred is not embryonic.", "logic": "\nAscensive(sutton)\nPushy(sutton)\nIdolised(sutton)\nEarless(sutton)\nPushy(ailey)\nPalatable(ailey)\nEmbryonic(ethelred)\nTyrolean(ethelred)\nPushy(ethelred)\nPalatable(ethelred)\nforall x (Embryonic(x) -> Idolised(x))\nforall x (Palatable(x) and Tyrolean(x) -> Embryonic(x))\nforall x (Embryonic(x) and Pushy(x) -> Palatable(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) and Palatable(x) -> Embryonic(x))\nforall x (Earless(x) -> Idolised(x))\nforall x (Pushy(x) -> Idolised(x))\nEarless(sutton) -> Ascensive(sutton)\nforall x (Idolised(x) and Earless(x) -> Embryonic(x))\n\nnot Embryonic(ethelred)\n\ntherefore Embryonic(ethelred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Theodor is epicurean. Theodor is intrepid. Theodor is filled. Theodor is rotational. Alia is intrepid. Alia is dedicated. Maurise is hermitic. Maurise is soughing. Maurise is intrepid. Maurise is dedicated. Blue people are filled. Round, soughing people are hermitic. All hermitic, intrepid people are dedicated. Big, dedicated people are hermitic. White people are filled. Green people are filled. If Theodor is rotational then Theodor is epicurean. Red, rotational people are hermitic. Maurise is filled.", "logic": "\nEpicurean(theodor)\nIntrepid(theodor)\nFilled(theodor)\nRotational(theodor)\nIntrepid(alia)\nDedicated(alia)\nHermitic(maurise)\nSoughing(maurise)\nIntrepid(maurise)\nDedicated(maurise)\nforall x (Hermitic(x) -> Filled(x))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and Soughing(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nforall x (Hermitic(x) and Intrepid(x) -> Dedicated(x))\nforall x (Epicurean(x) and Dedicated(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> Filled(x))\nforall x (Intrepid(x) -> Filled(x))\nRotational(theodor) -> Epicurean(theodor)\nforall x (Filled(x) and Rotational(x) -> Hermitic(x))\n\nFilled(maurise)\n\nHermitic(maurise) and forall x (Hermitic(x) -> Filled(x)) -> therefore Filled(maurise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Gladys is labelled. Gladys is elected. Gladys is asyndetic. Gladys is ecumenic. Leia is elected. Leia is strategic. Desiree is incoming. Desiree is topknotted. Desiree is elected. Desiree is strategic. Blue people are asyndetic. Round, topknotted people are incoming. All incoming, elected people are strategic. Big, strategic people are incoming. White people are asyndetic. Green people are asyndetic. If Gladys is ecumenic then Gladys is labelled. Red, ecumenic people are incoming. Leia is not asyndetic.", "logic": "\nLabelled(gladys)\nElected(gladys)\nAsyndetic(gladys)\nEcumenic(gladys)\nElected(leia)\nStrategic(leia)\nIncoming(desiree)\nTopknotted(desiree)\nElected(desiree)\nStrategic(desiree)\nforall x (Incoming(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Strategic(x) and Topknotted(x) -> Incoming(x))\nforall x (Incoming(x) and Elected(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Labelled(x) and Strategic(x) -> Incoming(x))\nforall x (Ecumenic(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Elected(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nEcumenic(gladys) -> Labelled(gladys)\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) and Ecumenic(x) -> Incoming(x))\n\nnot Asyndetic(leia)\n\nElected(leia) and forall x (Elected(x) -> Asyndetic(x)) -> therefore Asyndetic(leia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Blinny is solemn. Blinny is foliaceous. Blinny is horrific. Blinny is showery. Madella is foliaceous. Madella is ultimate. Peta is tremulous. Peta is episodic. Peta is foliaceous. Peta is ultimate. Blue people are horrific. Round, episodic people are tremulous. All tremulous, foliaceous people are ultimate. Big, ultimate people are tremulous. White people are horrific. Green people are horrific. If Blinny is showery then Blinny is solemn. Red, showery people are tremulous. Blinny is ultimate.", "logic": "\nSolemn(blinny)\nFoliaceous(blinny)\nHorrific(blinny)\nShowery(blinny)\nFoliaceous(madella)\nUltimate(madella)\nTremulous(peta)\nEpisodic(peta)\nFoliaceous(peta)\nUltimate(peta)\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Horrific(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) and Episodic(x) -> Tremulous(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and Foliaceous(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Solemn(x) and Ultimate(x) -> Tremulous(x))\nforall x (Showery(x) -> Horrific(x))\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) -> Horrific(x))\nShowery(blinny) -> Solemn(blinny)\nforall x (Horrific(x) and Showery(x) -> Tremulous(x))\n\nUltimate(blinny)\n\nHorrific(blinny) and Showery(blinny) and forall x (Horrific(x) and Showery(x) -> Tremulous(x)) -> therefore Tremulous(blinny) Tremulous(blinny) and Foliaceous(blinny) and forall x (Tremulous(x) and Foliaceous(x) -> Ultimate(x)) -> therefore Ultimate(blinny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Karleen is unhappy. Karleen is coloured. Karleen is scalloped. Karleen is mandatory. Robenia is coloured. Robenia is articulate. Niles is bicoloured. Niles is stupefying. Niles is coloured. Niles is articulate. Blue people are scalloped. Round, stupefying people are bicoloured. All bicoloured, coloured people are articulate. Big, articulate people are bicoloured. White people are scalloped. Green people are scalloped. If Karleen is mandatory then Karleen is unhappy. Red, mandatory people are bicoloured. Karleen is not articulate.", "logic": "\nUnhappy(karleen)\nColoured(karleen)\nScalloped(karleen)\nMandatory(karleen)\nColoured(robenia)\nArticulate(robenia)\nBicoloured(niles)\nStupefying(niles)\nColoured(niles)\nArticulate(niles)\nforall x (Bicoloured(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x) and Stupefying(x) -> Bicoloured(x))\nforall x (Bicoloured(x) and Coloured(x) -> Articulate(x))\nforall x (Unhappy(x) and Articulate(x) -> Bicoloured(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nforall x (Coloured(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nMandatory(karleen) -> Unhappy(karleen)\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Bicoloured(x))\n\nnot Articulate(karleen)\n\nScalloped(karleen) and Mandatory(karleen) and forall x (Scalloped(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Bicoloured(x)) -> therefore Bicoloured(karleen) Bicoloured(karleen) and Coloured(karleen) and forall x (Bicoloured(x) and Coloured(x) -> Articulate(x)) -> therefore Articulate(karleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Vannie is intimate. Vannie is mesmerised. Vannie is hornless. Vannie is secret. Clemmy is mesmerised. Clemmy is convolute. Avram is discursive. Avram is bushy. Avram is mesmerised. Avram is convolute. Blue people are hornless. Round, bushy people are discursive. All discursive, mesmerised people are convolute. Big, convolute people are discursive. White people are hornless. Green people are hornless. If Vannie is secret then Vannie is intimate. Red, secret people are discursive. Clemmy is not discursive.", "logic": "\nIntimate(vannie)\nMesmerised(vannie)\nHornless(vannie)\nSecret(vannie)\nMesmerised(clemmy)\nConvolute(clemmy)\nDiscursive(avram)\nBushy(avram)\nMesmerised(avram)\nConvolute(avram)\nforall x (Discursive(x) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x) and Bushy(x) -> Discursive(x))\nforall x (Discursive(x) and Mesmerised(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x) and Convolute(x) -> Discursive(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> Hornless(x))\nSecret(vannie) -> Intimate(vannie)\nforall x (Hornless(x) and Secret(x) -> Discursive(x))\n\nnot Discursive(clemmy)\n\nforall x (Convolute(x) and Bushy(x) -> Discursive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Hortensia is oncologic. Hortensia is rubbery. Hortensia is isomorphic. Hortensia is ferned. Mirabella is rubbery. Mirabella is unveiled. Cindee is spent. Cindee is quenchless. Cindee is rubbery. Cindee is unveiled. Blue people are isomorphic. Round, quenchless people are spent. All spent, rubbery people are unveiled. Big, unveiled people are spent. White people are isomorphic. Green people are isomorphic. If Hortensia is ferned then Hortensia is oncologic. Red, ferned people are spent. Cindee is oncologic.", "logic": "\nOncologic(hortensia)\nRubbery(hortensia)\nIsomorphic(hortensia)\nFerned(hortensia)\nRubbery(mirabella)\nUnveiled(mirabella)\nSpent(cindee)\nQuenchless(cindee)\nRubbery(cindee)\nUnveiled(cindee)\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) and Quenchless(x) -> Spent(x))\nforall x (Spent(x) and Rubbery(x) -> Unveiled(x))\nforall x (Oncologic(x) and Unveiled(x) -> Spent(x))\nforall x (Ferned(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Rubbery(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nFerned(hortensia) -> Oncologic(hortensia)\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) and Ferned(x) -> Spent(x))\n\nOncologic(cindee)\n\nOncologic(cindee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Talbot is detractive. Talbot is hebraical. Talbot is nativistic. Talbot is straying. Paule is hebraical. Paule is vixenish. Nevin is soppy. Nevin is stagy. Nevin is hebraical. Nevin is vixenish. Blue people are nativistic. Round, stagy people are soppy. All soppy, hebraical people are vixenish. Big, vixenish people are soppy. White people are nativistic. Green people are nativistic. If Talbot is straying then Talbot is detractive. Red, straying people are soppy. Paule is not detractive.", "logic": "\nDetractive(talbot)\nHebraical(talbot)\nNativistic(talbot)\nStraying(talbot)\nHebraical(paule)\nVixenish(paule)\nSoppy(nevin)\nStagy(nevin)\nHebraical(nevin)\nVixenish(nevin)\nforall x (Soppy(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) and Stagy(x) -> Soppy(x))\nforall x (Soppy(x) and Hebraical(x) -> Vixenish(x))\nforall x (Detractive(x) and Vixenish(x) -> Soppy(x))\nforall x (Straying(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nforall x (Hebraical(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nStraying(talbot) -> Detractive(talbot)\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Straying(x) -> Soppy(x))\n\nnot Detractive(paule)\n\nnot Detractive(paule) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Gerty is phyletic. Gerty is surmounted. Gerty is breeding. Gerty is stippled. Hedy is surmounted. Hedy is arsenious. Jacquie is cryogenic. Jacquie is star. Jacquie is surmounted. Jacquie is arsenious. Blue people are breeding. Round, star people are cryogenic. All cryogenic, surmounted people are arsenious. Big, arsenious people are cryogenic. White people are breeding. Green people are breeding. If Gerty is stippled then Gerty is phyletic. Red, stippled people are cryogenic. Jacquie is stippled.", "logic": "\nPhyletic(gerty)\nSurmounted(gerty)\nBreeding(gerty)\nStippled(gerty)\nSurmounted(hedy)\nArsenious(hedy)\nCryogenic(jacquie)\nStar(jacquie)\nSurmounted(jacquie)\nArsenious(jacquie)\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Breeding(x))\nforall x (Arsenious(x) and Star(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Arsenious(x))\nforall x (Phyletic(x) and Arsenious(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Breeding(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) -> Breeding(x))\nStippled(gerty) -> Phyletic(gerty)\nforall x (Breeding(x) and Stippled(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\n\nStippled(jacquie)\n\nStippled(jacquie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Graeme is birch. Graeme is westside. Graeme is harmonised. Graeme is unripe. Magnum is westside. Magnum is cacuminal. Orbadiah is stern. Orbadiah is unassigned. Orbadiah is westside. Orbadiah is cacuminal. Blue people are harmonised. Round, unassigned people are stern. All stern, westside people are cacuminal. Big, cacuminal people are stern. White people are harmonised. Green people are harmonised. If Graeme is unripe then Graeme is birch. Red, unripe people are stern. Magnum is not unripe.", "logic": "\nBirch(graeme)\nWestside(graeme)\nHarmonised(graeme)\nUnripe(graeme)\nWestside(magnum)\nCacuminal(magnum)\nStern(orbadiah)\nUnassigned(orbadiah)\nWestside(orbadiah)\nCacuminal(orbadiah)\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Harmonised(x))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Unassigned(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) and Westside(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Birch(x) and Cacuminal(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) -> Harmonised(x))\nforall x (Westside(x) -> Harmonised(x))\nUnripe(graeme) -> Birch(graeme)\nforall x (Harmonised(x) and Unripe(x) -> Stern(x))\n\nnot Unripe(magnum)\n\nnot Unripe(magnum) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Opal is desirable. Opal is rare. Opal is preemptive. Opal is amorous. Reggi is rare. Reggi is mismated. Sula is sloping. Sula is sized. Sula is rare. Sula is mismated. Blue people are preemptive. Round, sized people are sloping. All sloping, rare people are mismated. Big, mismated people are sloping. White people are preemptive. Green people are preemptive. If Opal is amorous then Opal is desirable. Red, amorous people are sloping. Opal is sized.", "logic": "\nDesirable(opal)\nRare(opal)\nPreemptive(opal)\nAmorous(opal)\nRare(reggi)\nMismated(reggi)\nSloping(sula)\nSized(sula)\nRare(sula)\nMismated(sula)\nforall x (Sloping(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) and Sized(x) -> Sloping(x))\nforall x (Sloping(x) and Rare(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and Mismated(x) -> Sloping(x))\nforall x (Amorous(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Rare(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nAmorous(opal) -> Desirable(opal)\nforall x (Preemptive(x) and Amorous(x) -> Sloping(x))\n\nSized(opal)\n\nSized(opal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1290"} {"premises": "Henderson is newsless. Dannye is husky. Taffy is indistinct. Taffy is flatulent. Rex is indistinct. Rex is newsless. Rex is autosomal. All autosomal, husky people are sitting. Nice, adamant people are sitting. Blue people are adamant. Taffy is indistinct.", "logic": "\nNewsless(henderson)\nHusky(dannye)\nIndistinct(taffy)\nFlatulent(taffy)\nIndistinct(rex)\nNewsless(rex)\nAutosomal(rex)\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Husky(x) -> Sitting(x))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) and Adamant(x) -> Sitting(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> Adamant(x))\n\nIndistinct(taffy)\n\ntherefore Indistinct(taffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Georgie is goddamn. Stanton is polydactyl. Ginger is unposed. Ginger is unsatiable. Morganica is unposed. Morganica is goddamn. Morganica is residual. All residual, polydactyl people are adscript. Nice, nauruan people are adscript. Blue people are nauruan. Stanton is not polydactyl.", "logic": "\nGoddamn(georgie)\nPolydactyl(stanton)\nUnposed(ginger)\nUnsatiable(ginger)\nUnposed(morganica)\nGoddamn(morganica)\nResidual(morganica)\nforall x (Residual(x) and Polydactyl(x) -> Adscript(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) and Nauruan(x) -> Adscript(x))\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Nauruan(x))\n\nnot Polydactyl(stanton)\n\ntherefore Polydactyl(stanton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Wade is metastatic. Alexis is solo. Murphy is pliable. Murphy is perianal. Gerianne is pliable. Gerianne is metastatic. Gerianne is nosohusial. All nosohusial, solo people are accessary. Nice, effeminate people are accessary. Blue people are effeminate. Gerianne is effeminate.", "logic": "\nMetastatic(wade)\nSolo(alexis)\nPliable(murphy)\nPerianal(murphy)\nPliable(gerianne)\nMetastatic(gerianne)\nNosohusial(gerianne)\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) and Solo(x) -> Accessary(x))\nforall x (Perianal(x) and Effeminate(x) -> Accessary(x))\nforall x (Pliable(x) -> Effeminate(x))\n\nEffeminate(gerianne)\n\nPliable(gerianne) and forall x (Pliable(x) -> Effeminate(x)) -> therefore Effeminate(gerianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Tam is cataphatic. Erastus is appellant. Celeste is directive. Celeste is slim. Lois is directive. Lois is cataphatic. Lois is affable. All affable, appellant people are hairy. Nice, redeemed people are hairy. Blue people are redeemed. Celeste is not redeemed.", "logic": "\nCataphatic(tam)\nAppellant(erastus)\nDirective(celeste)\nSlim(celeste)\nDirective(lois)\nCataphatic(lois)\nAffable(lois)\nforall x (Affable(x) and Appellant(x) -> Hairy(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) and Redeemed(x) -> Hairy(x))\nforall x (Directive(x) -> Redeemed(x))\n\nnot Redeemed(celeste)\n\nDirective(celeste) and forall x (Directive(x) -> Redeemed(x)) -> therefore Redeemed(celeste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Moria is dumbstruck. Kaja is cherry. Lacee is gambian. Lacee is political. Elicia is gambian. Elicia is dumbstruck. Elicia is orthodox. All orthodox, cherry people are noncaloric. Nice, estimable people are noncaloric. Blue people are estimable. Lacee is noncaloric.", "logic": "\nDumbstruck(moria)\nCherry(kaja)\nGambian(lacee)\nPolitical(lacee)\nGambian(elicia)\nDumbstruck(elicia)\nOrthodox(elicia)\nforall x (Orthodox(x) and Cherry(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Political(x) and Estimable(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> Estimable(x))\n\nNoncaloric(lacee)\n\nGambian(lacee) and forall x (Gambian(x) -> Estimable(x)) -> therefore Estimable(lacee) Political(lacee) and Estimable(lacee) and forall x (Political(x) and Estimable(x) -> Noncaloric(x)) -> therefore Noncaloric(lacee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Anatoly is delayed. Melvyn is peckish. Kristen is vexing. Kristen is lenten. Jillian is vexing. Jillian is delayed. Jillian is unabridged. All unabridged, peckish people are flippant. Nice, puzzled people are flippant. Blue people are puzzled. Kristen is not flippant.", "logic": "\nDelayed(anatoly)\nPeckish(melvyn)\nVexing(kristen)\nLenten(kristen)\nVexing(jillian)\nDelayed(jillian)\nUnabridged(jillian)\nforall x (Unabridged(x) and Peckish(x) -> Flippant(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) and Puzzled(x) -> Flippant(x))\nforall x (Vexing(x) -> Puzzled(x))\n\nnot Flippant(kristen)\n\nVexing(kristen) and forall x (Vexing(x) -> Puzzled(x)) -> therefore Puzzled(kristen) Lenten(kristen) and Puzzled(kristen) and forall x (Lenten(x) and Puzzled(x) -> Flippant(x)) -> therefore Flippant(kristen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Jaleh is acrobatic. Freda is gluey. Lawrence is viricidal. Lawrence is analyzable. Arlana is viricidal. Arlana is acrobatic. Arlana is stemmed. All stemmed, gluey people are perceived. Nice, spartan people are perceived. Blue people are spartan. Freda is not perceived.", "logic": "\nAcrobatic(jaleh)\nGluey(freda)\nViricidal(lawrence)\nAnalyzable(lawrence)\nViricidal(arlana)\nAcrobatic(arlana)\nStemmed(arlana)\nforall x (Stemmed(x) and Gluey(x) -> Perceived(x))\nforall x (Analyzable(x) and Spartan(x) -> Perceived(x))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) -> Spartan(x))\n\nnot Perceived(freda)\n\nforall x (Stemmed(x) and Gluey(x) -> Perceived(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Elwyn is vicious. Fania is bisontine. Aurel is sleepy. Aurel is nonplused. Carolan is sleepy. Carolan is vicious. Carolan is preclusive. All preclusive, bisontine people are glutted. Nice, proverbial people are glutted. Blue people are proverbial. Elwyn is glutted.", "logic": "\nVicious(elwyn)\nBisontine(fania)\nSleepy(aurel)\nNonplused(aurel)\nSleepy(carolan)\nVicious(carolan)\nPreclusive(carolan)\nforall x (Preclusive(x) and Bisontine(x) -> Glutted(x))\nforall x (Nonplused(x) and Proverbial(x) -> Glutted(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) -> Proverbial(x))\n\nGlutted(elwyn)\n\nforall x (Preclusive(x) and Bisontine(x) -> Glutted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Jenine is agitated. Ruben is pedigreed. Theressa is inept. Theressa is chemic. Stacia is inept. Stacia is agitated. Stacia is lingual. All lingual, pedigreed people are loved. Nice, ecumenical people are loved. Blue people are ecumenical. Stacia is not loved.", "logic": "\nAgitated(jenine)\nPedigreed(ruben)\nInept(theressa)\nChemic(theressa)\nInept(stacia)\nAgitated(stacia)\nLingual(stacia)\nforall x (Lingual(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> Loved(x))\nforall x (Chemic(x) and Ecumenical(x) -> Loved(x))\nforall x (Inept(x) -> Ecumenical(x))\n\nnot Loved(stacia)\n\nforall x (Lingual(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> Loved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Aloysius is unlamented. Aeriel is apiculate. Moshe is primary. Moshe is textile. Flem is primary. Flem is unlamented. Flem is fevered. All fevered, apiculate people are plucked. Nice, devalued people are plucked. Blue people are devalued. Aloysius is apiculate.", "logic": "\nUnlamented(aloysius)\nApiculate(aeriel)\nPrimary(moshe)\nTextile(moshe)\nPrimary(flem)\nUnlamented(flem)\nFevered(flem)\nforall x (Fevered(x) and Apiculate(x) -> Plucked(x))\nforall x (Textile(x) and Devalued(x) -> Plucked(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Devalued(x))\n\nApiculate(aloysius)\n\nApiculate(aloysius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Delia is flavourous. Dahlia is buffoonish. Tad is uproarious. Tad is loquacious. Pet is uproarious. Pet is flavourous. Pet is numidian. All numidian, buffoonish people are meek. Nice, oozy people are meek. Blue people are oozy. Delia is not uproarious.", "logic": "\nFlavourous(delia)\nBuffoonish(dahlia)\nUproarious(tad)\nLoquacious(tad)\nUproarious(pet)\nFlavourous(pet)\nNumidian(pet)\nforall x (Numidian(x) and Buffoonish(x) -> Meek(x))\nforall x (Loquacious(x) and Oozy(x) -> Meek(x))\nforall x (Uproarious(x) -> Oozy(x))\n\nnot Uproarious(delia)\n\nnot Uproarious(delia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Giselle is adjunct. Stacee is genuine. Vanessa is unplayful. Vanessa is literal. Daune is unplayful. Daune is adjunct. Daune is dexterous. All dexterous, genuine people are unsoluble. Nice, pianissimo people are unsoluble. Blue people are pianissimo. Vanessa is genuine.", "logic": "\nAdjunct(giselle)\nGenuine(stacee)\nUnplayful(vanessa)\nLiteral(vanessa)\nUnplayful(daune)\nAdjunct(daune)\nDexterous(daune)\nforall x (Dexterous(x) and Genuine(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Pianissimo(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Pianissimo(x))\n\nGenuine(vanessa)\n\nGenuine(vanessa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-686"} {"premises": "Clareta is candid. Blinni is xcvi. Elfreda is scurvy. If someone is unratified then they are xcvi. If someone is scurvy then they are unratified. Clareta is candid.", "logic": "\nCandid(clareta)\nXcvi(blinni)\nScurvy(elfreda)\nforall x (Unratified(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) -> Unratified(x))\n\nCandid(clareta)\n\ntherefore Candid(clareta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Vivianne is ammonitic. Stevy is tottering. Elizabet is toothlike. If someone is prongy then they are tottering. If someone is toothlike then they are prongy. Vivianne is not ammonitic.", "logic": "\nAmmonitic(vivianne)\nTottering(stevy)\nToothlike(elizabet)\nforall x (Prongy(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Prongy(x))\n\nnot Ammonitic(vivianne)\n\ntherefore Ammonitic(vivianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Roxy is jolted. Selma is unwearying. Tamma is gnomic. If someone is fledgeless then they are unwearying. If someone is gnomic then they are fledgeless. Tamma is fledgeless.", "logic": "\nJolted(roxy)\nUnwearying(selma)\nGnomic(tamma)\nforall x (Fledgeless(x) -> Unwearying(x))\nforall x (Gnomic(x) -> Fledgeless(x))\n\nFledgeless(tamma)\n\nGnomic(tamma) and forall x (Gnomic(x) -> Fledgeless(x)) -> therefore Fledgeless(tamma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Royal is ascetical. Mitchel is ulcerated. Erna is monkish. If someone is diluvial then they are ulcerated. If someone is monkish then they are diluvial. Erna is not diluvial.", "logic": "\nAscetical(royal)\nUlcerated(mitchel)\nMonkish(erna)\nforall x (Diluvial(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\nforall x (Monkish(x) -> Diluvial(x))\n\nnot Diluvial(erna)\n\nMonkish(erna) and forall x (Monkish(x) -> Diluvial(x)) -> therefore Diluvial(erna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Barnebas is unentitled. Stuart is breakaway. Jacintha is harmless. If someone is odorous then they are breakaway. If someone is harmless then they are odorous. Jacintha is breakaway.", "logic": "\nUnentitled(barnebas)\nBreakaway(stuart)\nHarmless(jacintha)\nforall x (Odorous(x) -> Breakaway(x))\nforall x (Harmless(x) -> Odorous(x))\n\nBreakaway(jacintha)\n\nHarmless(jacintha) and forall x (Harmless(x) -> Odorous(x)) -> therefore Odorous(jacintha) Odorous(jacintha) and forall x (Odorous(x) -> Breakaway(x)) -> therefore Breakaway(jacintha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Hayes is lawless. Lisa is panoplied. Winn is arthralgic. If someone is planate then they are panoplied. If someone is arthralgic then they are planate. Winn is not panoplied.", "logic": "\nLawless(hayes)\nPanoplied(lisa)\nArthralgic(winn)\nforall x (Planate(x) -> Panoplied(x))\nforall x (Arthralgic(x) -> Planate(x))\n\nnot Panoplied(winn)\n\nArthralgic(winn) and forall x (Arthralgic(x) -> Planate(x)) -> therefore Planate(winn) Planate(winn) and forall x (Planate(x) -> Panoplied(x)) -> therefore Panoplied(winn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Bonnie is benignant. Maggie is bilinear. Emogene is motile. If someone is hoar then they are bilinear. If someone is motile then they are hoar. Maggie is not hoar.", "logic": "\nBenignant(bonnie)\nBilinear(maggie)\nMotile(emogene)\nforall x (Hoar(x) -> Bilinear(x))\nforall x (Motile(x) -> Hoar(x))\n\nnot Hoar(maggie)\n\nforall x (Motile(x) -> Hoar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Malinda is arbitrable. Inge is metric. Michel is inoperable. If someone is vasiform then they are metric. If someone is inoperable then they are vasiform. Malinda is vasiform.", "logic": "\nArbitrable(malinda)\nMetric(inge)\nInoperable(michel)\nforall x (Vasiform(x) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) -> Vasiform(x))\n\nVasiform(malinda)\n\nforall x (Inoperable(x) -> Vasiform(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Violante is signal. Worth is jellied. Mace is attentive. If someone is cattish then they are jellied. If someone is attentive then they are cattish. Violante is not jellied.", "logic": "\nSignal(violante)\nJellied(worth)\nAttentive(mace)\nforall x (Cattish(x) -> Jellied(x))\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Cattish(x))\n\nnot Jellied(violante)\n\nforall x (Cattish(x) -> Jellied(x)) <- forall x (Attentive(x) -> Cattish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Rebekah is foul. Priscella is electronic. Garret is gowned. If someone is squat then they are electronic. If someone is gowned then they are squat. Garret is cold.", "logic": "\nFoul(rebekah)\nElectronic(priscella)\nGowned(garret)\nforall x (Squat(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Gowned(x) -> Squat(x))\n\nCold(garret)\n\nCold(garret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Loise is chambered. Jodie is meet. Lauretta is sexed. If someone is antarctic then they are meet. If someone is sexed then they are antarctic. Loise is not sexed.", "logic": "\nChambered(loise)\nMeet(jodie)\nSexed(lauretta)\nforall x (Antarctic(x) -> Meet(x))\nforall x (Sexed(x) -> Antarctic(x))\n\nnot Sexed(loise)\n\nnot Sexed(loise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Marillin is unturned. Carey is cognisable. Aguste is univocal. If someone is igneous then they are cognisable. If someone is univocal then they are igneous. Carey is furry.", "logic": "\nUnturned(marillin)\nCognisable(carey)\nUnivocal(aguste)\nforall x (Igneous(x) -> Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Univocal(x) -> Igneous(x))\n\nFurry(carey)\n\nFurry(carey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1548"} {"premises": "Jacqui is ctenoid. Jacqui is riparian. Jacqui is doting. Jacqui is galilean. Jacqui is shifting. Maison is ctenoid. Maison is voluptuous. Maison is doting. Maison is shifting. Roderich is voluptuous. Roderich is shifting. Tucky is riparian. Tucky is doting. Tucky is express. Tucky is shifting. All express things are galilean. If something is doting and voluptuous then it is shifting. All express things are shifting. All galilean, riparian things are voluptuous. All riparian, express things are doting. If something is riparian and ctenoid then it is doting. Roderich is voluptuous.", "logic": "\nCtenoid(jacqui)\nRiparian(jacqui)\nDoting(jacqui)\nGalilean(jacqui)\nShifting(jacqui)\nCtenoid(maison)\nVoluptuous(maison)\nDoting(maison)\nShifting(maison)\nVoluptuous(roderich)\nShifting(roderich)\nRiparian(tucky)\nDoting(tucky)\nExpress(tucky)\nShifting(tucky)\nforall x (Express(x) -> Galilean(x))\nforall x (Doting(x) and Voluptuous(x) -> Shifting(x))\nforall x (Express(x) -> Shifting(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) and Riparian(x) -> Voluptuous(x))\nforall x (Riparian(x) and Express(x) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Riparian(x) and Ctenoid(x) -> Doting(x))\n\nVoluptuous(roderich)\n\ntherefore Voluptuous(roderich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Urban is trousered. Urban is potted. Urban is unwatchful. Urban is mithraic. Urban is regulation. Catherin is trousered. Catherin is flemish. Catherin is unwatchful. Catherin is regulation. Ulric is flemish. Ulric is regulation. Martyn is potted. Martyn is unwatchful. Martyn is elaborated. Martyn is regulation. All elaborated things are mithraic. If something is unwatchful and flemish then it is regulation. All elaborated things are regulation. All mithraic, potted things are flemish. All potted, elaborated things are unwatchful. If something is potted and trousered then it is unwatchful. Urban is not mithraic.", "logic": "\nTrousered(urban)\nPotted(urban)\nUnwatchful(urban)\nMithraic(urban)\nRegulation(urban)\nTrousered(catherin)\nFlemish(catherin)\nUnwatchful(catherin)\nRegulation(catherin)\nFlemish(ulric)\nRegulation(ulric)\nPotted(martyn)\nUnwatchful(martyn)\nElaborated(martyn)\nRegulation(martyn)\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Unwatchful(x) and Flemish(x) -> Regulation(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Regulation(x))\nforall x (Mithraic(x) and Potted(x) -> Flemish(x))\nforall x (Potted(x) and Elaborated(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\nforall x (Potted(x) and Trousered(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\n\nnot Mithraic(urban)\n\ntherefore Mithraic(urban)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Greg is swinging. Greg is androgenic. Greg is ingenious. Greg is damask. Greg is interwoven. Tricia is swinging. Tricia is hypotonic. Tricia is ingenious. Tricia is interwoven. Robyn is hypotonic. Robyn is interwoven. Torey is androgenic. Torey is ingenious. Torey is dowerless. Torey is interwoven. All dowerless things are damask. If something is ingenious and hypotonic then it is interwoven. All dowerless things are interwoven. All damask, androgenic things are hypotonic. All androgenic, dowerless things are ingenious. If something is androgenic and swinging then it is ingenious. Greg is hypotonic.", "logic": "\nSwinging(greg)\nAndrogenic(greg)\nIngenious(greg)\nDamask(greg)\nInterwoven(greg)\nSwinging(tricia)\nHypotonic(tricia)\nIngenious(tricia)\nInterwoven(tricia)\nHypotonic(robyn)\nInterwoven(robyn)\nAndrogenic(torey)\nIngenious(torey)\nDowerless(torey)\nInterwoven(torey)\nforall x (Dowerless(x) -> Damask(x))\nforall x (Ingenious(x) and Hypotonic(x) -> Interwoven(x))\nforall x (Dowerless(x) -> Interwoven(x))\nforall x (Damask(x) and Androgenic(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) and Dowerless(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) and Swinging(x) -> Ingenious(x))\n\nHypotonic(greg)\n\nDamask(greg) and Androgenic(greg) and forall x (Damask(x) and Androgenic(x) -> Hypotonic(x)) -> therefore Hypotonic(greg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Marcelia is eccentric. Marcelia is caulked. Marcelia is distaff. Marcelia is cuneal. Marcelia is nacreous. Padraig is eccentric. Padraig is clueless. Padraig is distaff. Padraig is nacreous. Johanna is clueless. Johanna is nacreous. Isabelle is caulked. Isabelle is distaff. Isabelle is perfumed. Isabelle is nacreous. All perfumed things are cuneal. If something is distaff and clueless then it is nacreous. All perfumed things are nacreous. All cuneal, caulked things are clueless. All caulked, perfumed things are distaff. If something is caulked and eccentric then it is distaff. Marcelia is not clueless.", "logic": "\nEccentric(marcelia)\nCaulked(marcelia)\nDistaff(marcelia)\nCuneal(marcelia)\nNacreous(marcelia)\nEccentric(padraig)\nClueless(padraig)\nDistaff(padraig)\nNacreous(padraig)\nClueless(johanna)\nNacreous(johanna)\nCaulked(isabelle)\nDistaff(isabelle)\nPerfumed(isabelle)\nNacreous(isabelle)\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Cuneal(x))\nforall x (Distaff(x) and Clueless(x) -> Nacreous(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Nacreous(x))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) and Caulked(x) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) and Perfumed(x) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) and Eccentric(x) -> Distaff(x))\n\nnot Clueless(marcelia)\n\nCuneal(marcelia) and Caulked(marcelia) and forall x (Cuneal(x) and Caulked(x) -> Clueless(x)) -> therefore Clueless(marcelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Nataline is beechen. Nataline is echoic. Nataline is saintly. Nataline is starchless. Nataline is phoenician. Paten is beechen. Paten is boiled. Paten is saintly. Paten is phoenician. Hank is boiled. Hank is phoenician. Cherida is echoic. Cherida is saintly. Cherida is erstwhile. Cherida is phoenician. All erstwhile things are starchless. If something is saintly and boiled then it is phoenician. All erstwhile things are phoenician. All starchless, echoic things are boiled. All echoic, erstwhile things are saintly. If something is echoic and beechen then it is saintly. Cherida is boiled.", "logic": "\nBeechen(nataline)\nEchoic(nataline)\nSaintly(nataline)\nStarchless(nataline)\nPhoenician(nataline)\nBeechen(paten)\nBoiled(paten)\nSaintly(paten)\nPhoenician(paten)\nBoiled(hank)\nPhoenician(hank)\nEchoic(cherida)\nSaintly(cherida)\nErstwhile(cherida)\nPhoenician(cherida)\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Starchless(x))\nforall x (Saintly(x) and Boiled(x) -> Phoenician(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Phoenician(x))\nforall x (Starchless(x) and Echoic(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) and Erstwhile(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) and Beechen(x) -> Saintly(x))\n\nBoiled(cherida)\n\nErstwhile(cherida) and forall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Starchless(x)) -> therefore Starchless(cherida) Starchless(cherida) and Echoic(cherida) and forall x (Starchless(x) and Echoic(x) -> Boiled(x)) -> therefore Boiled(cherida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Ellsworth is molded. Ellsworth is malay. Ellsworth is yokelish. Ellsworth is unbeknown. Ellsworth is essential. Roxie is molded. Roxie is stock. Roxie is yokelish. Roxie is essential. Frederik is stock. Frederik is essential. Wilow is malay. Wilow is yokelish. Wilow is shakeable. Wilow is essential. All shakeable things are unbeknown. If something is yokelish and stock then it is essential. All shakeable things are essential. All unbeknown, malay things are stock. All malay, shakeable things are yokelish. If something is malay and molded then it is yokelish. Wilow is not stock.", "logic": "\nMolded(ellsworth)\nMalay(ellsworth)\nYokelish(ellsworth)\nUnbeknown(ellsworth)\nEssential(ellsworth)\nMolded(roxie)\nStock(roxie)\nYokelish(roxie)\nEssential(roxie)\nStock(frederik)\nEssential(frederik)\nMalay(wilow)\nYokelish(wilow)\nShakeable(wilow)\nEssential(wilow)\nforall x (Shakeable(x) -> Unbeknown(x))\nforall x (Yokelish(x) and Stock(x) -> Essential(x))\nforall x (Shakeable(x) -> Essential(x))\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) and Malay(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Malay(x) and Shakeable(x) -> Yokelish(x))\nforall x (Malay(x) and Molded(x) -> Yokelish(x))\n\nnot Stock(wilow)\n\nShakeable(wilow) and forall x (Shakeable(x) -> Unbeknown(x)) -> therefore Unbeknown(wilow) Unbeknown(wilow) and Malay(wilow) and forall x (Unbeknown(x) and Malay(x) -> Stock(x)) -> therefore Stock(wilow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Dino is bicentric. Dino is unchanging. Dino is scots. Dino is infatuated. Dino is outlaw. Darbie is bicentric. Darbie is vasomotor. Darbie is scots. Darbie is outlaw. Sterling is vasomotor. Sterling is outlaw. Maynord is unchanging. Maynord is scots. Maynord is unfrozen. Maynord is outlaw. All unfrozen things are infatuated. If something is scots and vasomotor then it is outlaw. All unfrozen things are outlaw. All infatuated, unchanging things are vasomotor. All unchanging, unfrozen things are scots. If something is unchanging and bicentric then it is scots. Sterling is not infatuated.", "logic": "\nBicentric(dino)\nUnchanging(dino)\nScots(dino)\nInfatuated(dino)\nOutlaw(dino)\nBicentric(darbie)\nVasomotor(darbie)\nScots(darbie)\nOutlaw(darbie)\nVasomotor(sterling)\nOutlaw(sterling)\nUnchanging(maynord)\nScots(maynord)\nUnfrozen(maynord)\nOutlaw(maynord)\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Infatuated(x))\nforall x (Scots(x) and Vasomotor(x) -> Outlaw(x))\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Outlaw(x))\nforall x (Infatuated(x) and Unchanging(x) -> Vasomotor(x))\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and Unfrozen(x) -> Scots(x))\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and Bicentric(x) -> Scots(x))\n\nnot Infatuated(sterling)\n\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Infatuated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Aubrette is devotional. Aubrette is festal. Aubrette is bromic. Aubrette is eastward. Aubrette is serial. Dasi is devotional. Dasi is demure. Dasi is bromic. Dasi is serial. Devinne is demure. Devinne is serial. Jemmy is festal. Jemmy is bromic. Jemmy is miry. Jemmy is serial. All miry things are eastward. If something is bromic and demure then it is serial. All miry things are serial. All eastward, festal things are demure. All festal, miry things are bromic. If something is festal and devotional then it is bromic. Dasi is eastward.", "logic": "\nDevotional(aubrette)\nFestal(aubrette)\nBromic(aubrette)\nEastward(aubrette)\nSerial(aubrette)\nDevotional(dasi)\nDemure(dasi)\nBromic(dasi)\nSerial(dasi)\nDemure(devinne)\nSerial(devinne)\nFestal(jemmy)\nBromic(jemmy)\nMiry(jemmy)\nSerial(jemmy)\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Bromic(x) and Demure(x) -> Serial(x))\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Serial(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) and Festal(x) -> Demure(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and Miry(x) -> Bromic(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and Devotional(x) -> Bromic(x))\n\nEastward(dasi)\n\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Eastward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Kelsi is continual. Kelsi is avascular. Kelsi is pejorative. Kelsi is moveable. Kelsi is perpetual. Joy is continual. Joy is japanese. Joy is pejorative. Joy is perpetual. Allsun is japanese. Allsun is perpetual. Alicia is avascular. Alicia is pejorative. Alicia is syncopated. Alicia is perpetual. All syncopated things are moveable. If something is pejorative and japanese then it is perpetual. All syncopated things are perpetual. All moveable, avascular things are japanese. All avascular, syncopated things are pejorative. If something is avascular and continual then it is pejorative. Allsun is not pejorative.", "logic": "\nContinual(kelsi)\nAvascular(kelsi)\nPejorative(kelsi)\nMoveable(kelsi)\nPerpetual(kelsi)\nContinual(joy)\nJapanese(joy)\nPejorative(joy)\nPerpetual(joy)\nJapanese(allsun)\nPerpetual(allsun)\nAvascular(alicia)\nPejorative(alicia)\nSyncopated(alicia)\nPerpetual(alicia)\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Moveable(x))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) and Japanese(x) -> Perpetual(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Perpetual(x))\nforall x (Moveable(x) and Avascular(x) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Avascular(x) and Syncopated(x) -> Pejorative(x))\nforall x (Avascular(x) and Continual(x) -> Pejorative(x))\n\nnot Pejorative(allsun)\n\nforall x (Avascular(x) and Syncopated(x) -> Pejorative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Taddeus is stressful. Taddeus is consumable. Taddeus is ichorous. Taddeus is outclassed. Taddeus is theist. Theresa is stressful. Theresa is looted. Theresa is ichorous. Theresa is theist. Kimberley is looted. Kimberley is theist. Sibley is consumable. Sibley is ichorous. Sibley is unpeopled. Sibley is theist. All unpeopled things are outclassed. If something is ichorous and looted then it is theist. All unpeopled things are theist. All outclassed, consumable things are looted. All consumable, unpeopled things are ichorous. If something is consumable and stressful then it is ichorous. Sibley is stressful.", "logic": "\nStressful(taddeus)\nConsumable(taddeus)\nIchorous(taddeus)\nOutclassed(taddeus)\nTheist(taddeus)\nStressful(theresa)\nLooted(theresa)\nIchorous(theresa)\nTheist(theresa)\nLooted(kimberley)\nTheist(kimberley)\nConsumable(sibley)\nIchorous(sibley)\nUnpeopled(sibley)\nTheist(sibley)\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) -> Outclassed(x))\nforall x (Ichorous(x) and Looted(x) -> Theist(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) -> Theist(x))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) and Consumable(x) -> Looted(x))\nforall x (Consumable(x) and Unpeopled(x) -> Ichorous(x))\nforall x (Consumable(x) and Stressful(x) -> Ichorous(x))\n\nStressful(sibley)\n\nStressful(sibley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Dewey is wonted. Dewey is undulant. Dewey is perirhinal. Dewey is eatable. Dewey is coercive. Lynnea is wonted. Lynnea is guided. Lynnea is perirhinal. Lynnea is coercive. Neale is guided. Neale is coercive. Joelly is undulant. Joelly is perirhinal. Joelly is subscribed. Joelly is coercive. All subscribed things are eatable. If something is perirhinal and guided then it is coercive. All subscribed things are coercive. All eatable, undulant things are guided. All undulant, subscribed things are perirhinal. If something is undulant and wonted then it is perirhinal. Dewey is not subscribed.", "logic": "\nWonted(dewey)\nUndulant(dewey)\nPerirhinal(dewey)\nEatable(dewey)\nCoercive(dewey)\nWonted(lynnea)\nGuided(lynnea)\nPerirhinal(lynnea)\nCoercive(lynnea)\nGuided(neale)\nCoercive(neale)\nUndulant(joelly)\nPerirhinal(joelly)\nSubscribed(joelly)\nCoercive(joelly)\nforall x (Subscribed(x) -> Eatable(x))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) and Guided(x) -> Coercive(x))\nforall x (Subscribed(x) -> Coercive(x))\nforall x (Eatable(x) and Undulant(x) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Undulant(x) and Subscribed(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Undulant(x) and Wonted(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\n\nnot Subscribed(dewey)\n\nnot Subscribed(dewey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Erika is slashing. Erika is wolfish. Erika is homeward. Erika is rewardful. Erika is piercing. Errol is slashing. Errol is addressed. Errol is homeward. Errol is piercing. Jilli is addressed. Jilli is piercing. Myna is wolfish. Myna is homeward. Myna is moderate. Myna is piercing. All moderate things are rewardful. If something is homeward and addressed then it is piercing. All moderate things are piercing. All rewardful, wolfish things are addressed. All wolfish, moderate things are homeward. If something is wolfish and slashing then it is homeward. Jilli is slashing.", "logic": "\nSlashing(erika)\nWolfish(erika)\nHomeward(erika)\nRewardful(erika)\nPiercing(erika)\nSlashing(errol)\nAddressed(errol)\nHomeward(errol)\nPiercing(errol)\nAddressed(jilli)\nPiercing(jilli)\nWolfish(myna)\nHomeward(myna)\nModerate(myna)\nPiercing(myna)\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Rewardful(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) and Addressed(x) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) and Wolfish(x) -> Addressed(x))\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and Moderate(x) -> Homeward(x))\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and Slashing(x) -> Homeward(x))\n\nSlashing(jilli)\n\nSlashing(jilli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "Eudora is peopled. Amie is not flattened. Quiet people are scaphoid. If someone is scaphoid then they are not bicorned. Eudora is peopled.", "logic": "\nPeopled(eudora)\nnot Flattened(amie)\nforall x (Peopled(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> not Bicorned(x))\n\nPeopled(eudora)\n\ntherefore Peopled(eudora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Bryna is avellane. Sven is not lubberly. Quiet people are frore. If someone is frore then they are not leptorhine. Bryna is not avellane.", "logic": "\nAvellane(bryna)\nnot Lubberly(sven)\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Frore(x))\nforall x (Frore(x) -> not Leptorhine(x))\n\nnot Avellane(bryna)\n\ntherefore Avellane(bryna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Hilbert is extra. Irma is not unwrinkled. Quiet people are rusty. If someone is rusty then they are not soundable. Hilbert is rusty.", "logic": "\nExtra(hilbert)\nnot Unwrinkled(irma)\nforall x (Extra(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Rusty(x) -> not Soundable(x))\n\nRusty(hilbert)\n\nExtra(hilbert) and forall x (Extra(x) -> Rusty(x)) -> therefore Rusty(hilbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Crysta is treelike. Aile is not kampuchean. Quiet people are inelegant. If someone is inelegant then they are not cataleptic. Crysta is not inelegant.", "logic": "\nTreelike(crysta)\nnot Kampuchean(aile)\nforall x (Treelike(x) -> Inelegant(x))\nforall x (Inelegant(x) -> not Cataleptic(x))\n\nnot Inelegant(crysta)\n\nTreelike(crysta) and forall x (Treelike(x) -> Inelegant(x)) -> therefore Inelegant(crysta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Sholom is amniotic. Cherilyn is not undercover. Quiet people are organismal. If someone is organismal then they are not thumbed. Sholom is not thumbed.", "logic": "\nAmniotic(sholom)\nnot Undercover(cherilyn)\nforall x (Amniotic(x) -> Organismal(x))\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> not Thumbed(x))\n\nnot Thumbed(sholom)\n\nAmniotic(sholom) and forall x (Amniotic(x) -> Organismal(x)) -> therefore Organismal(sholom) Organismal(sholom) and forall x (Organismal(x) -> not Thumbed(x)) -> therefore not Thumbed(sholom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Maurice is looseleaf. Melodee is not cupulate. Quiet people are rippled. If someone is rippled then they are not loved. Maurice is loved.", "logic": "\nLooseleaf(maurice)\nnot Cupulate(melodee)\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Rippled(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) -> not Loved(x))\n\nLoved(maurice)\n\nLooseleaf(maurice) and forall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Rippled(x)) -> therefore Rippled(maurice) Rippled(maurice) and forall x (Rippled(x) -> not Loved(x)) -> therefore not Loved(maurice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Petunia is inexplicit. Gardner is not recherche. Quiet people are passee. If someone is passee then they are not percipient. Gardner is not passee.", "logic": "\nInexplicit(petunia)\nnot Recherche(gardner)\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) -> Passee(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) -> not Percipient(x))\n\nnot Passee(gardner)\n\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) -> Passee(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Cynthia is kafkaesque. Martie is not ferrous. Quiet people are luxuriant. If someone is luxuriant then they are not nucleate. Martie is kafkaesque.", "logic": "\nKafkaesque(cynthia)\nnot Ferrous(martie)\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> not Nucleate(x))\n\nKafkaesque(martie)\n\nKafkaesque(martie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Lynea is idyllic. Dorelia is not fragile. Quiet people are unhardened. If someone is unhardened then they are not thrillful. Lynea is not rough.", "logic": "\nIdyllic(lynea)\nnot Fragile(dorelia)\nforall x (Idyllic(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> not Thrillful(x))\n\nnot Rough(lynea)\n\nnot Rough(lynea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Maurita is plumelike. Clemence is not turbid. Quiet people are proverbial. If someone is proverbial then they are not paired. Clemence is furry.", "logic": "\nPlumelike(maurita)\nnot Turbid(clemence)\nforall x (Plumelike(x) -> Proverbial(x))\nforall x (Proverbial(x) -> not Paired(x))\n\nFurry(clemence)\n\nFurry(clemence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Freddie is unattired. Gerladina is not afferent. Quiet people are unusable. If someone is unusable then they are not semiotic. Freddie is not afferent.", "logic": "\nUnattired(freddie)\nnot Afferent(gerladina)\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Unusable(x))\nforall x (Unusable(x) -> not Semiotic(x))\n\nnot Afferent(freddie)\n\nnot Afferent(freddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Honoria is apophyseal. Petronia is not indiscreet. Quiet people are voidable. If someone is voidable then they are not clockwise. Petronia is big.", "logic": "\nApophyseal(honoria)\nnot Indiscreet(petronia)\nforall x (Apophyseal(x) -> Voidable(x))\nforall x (Voidable(x) -> not Clockwise(x))\n\nBig(petronia)\n\nBig(petronia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-971"} {"premises": "Lothar is lowland. Emilio is not prosaic. Silvie is confident. Silvie is lowland. Silvie is sisterlike. Karoly is prosaic. Karoly is sisterlike. If Silvie is garbed and Silvie is not outermost then Silvie is confident. If something is garbed and not sisterlike then it is not destitute. All outermost, prosaic things are not lowland. If something is confident and outermost then it is lowland. Rough things are confident. If something is sisterlike and not destitute then it is confident. If something is destitute then it is confident. Smart things are prosaic. Silvie is confident.", "logic": "\nLowland(lothar)\nnot Prosaic(emilio)\nConfident(silvie)\nLowland(silvie)\nSisterlike(silvie)\nProsaic(karoly)\nSisterlike(karoly)\nGarbed(silvie) and not Outermost(silvie) -> Confident(silvie)\nforall x (Garbed(x) and not Sisterlike(x) -> not Destitute(x))\nforall x (Outermost(x) and Prosaic(x) -> not Lowland(x))\nforall x (Confident(x) and Outermost(x) -> Lowland(x))\nforall x (Prosaic(x) -> Confident(x))\nforall x (Sisterlike(x) and not Destitute(x) -> Confident(x))\nforall x (Destitute(x) -> Confident(x))\nforall x (Lowland(x) -> Prosaic(x))\n\nConfident(silvie)\n\ntherefore Confident(silvie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Wyndham is walleyed. Leontyne is not naked. Nadine is attempted. Nadine is walleyed. Nadine is transient. Bellanca is naked. Bellanca is transient. If Nadine is motorless and Nadine is not gradatory then Nadine is attempted. If something is motorless and not transient then it is not native. All gradatory, naked things are not walleyed. If something is attempted and gradatory then it is walleyed. Rough things are attempted. If something is transient and not native then it is attempted. If something is native then it is attempted. Smart things are naked. Bellanca is not transient.", "logic": "\nWalleyed(wyndham)\nnot Naked(leontyne)\nAttempted(nadine)\nWalleyed(nadine)\nTransient(nadine)\nNaked(bellanca)\nTransient(bellanca)\nMotorless(nadine) and not Gradatory(nadine) -> Attempted(nadine)\nforall x (Motorless(x) and not Transient(x) -> not Native(x))\nforall x (Gradatory(x) and Naked(x) -> not Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Attempted(x) and Gradatory(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Naked(x) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) and not Native(x) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Native(x) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) -> Naked(x))\n\nnot Transient(bellanca)\n\ntherefore Transient(bellanca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Diann is practical. Evangelia is not mastoid. Griswold is watered. Griswold is practical. Griswold is azygos. Gabriel is mastoid. Gabriel is azygos. If Griswold is whopping and Griswold is not sandaled then Griswold is watered. If something is whopping and not azygos then it is not strange. All sandaled, mastoid things are not practical. If something is watered and sandaled then it is practical. Rough things are watered. If something is azygos and not strange then it is watered. If something is strange then it is watered. Smart things are mastoid. Gabriel is watered.", "logic": "\nPractical(diann)\nnot Mastoid(evangelia)\nWatered(griswold)\nPractical(griswold)\nAzygos(griswold)\nMastoid(gabriel)\nAzygos(gabriel)\nWhopping(griswold) and not Sandaled(griswold) -> Watered(griswold)\nforall x (Whopping(x) and not Azygos(x) -> not Strange(x))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) and Mastoid(x) -> not Practical(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) and Sandaled(x) -> Practical(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) -> Watered(x))\nforall x (Azygos(x) and not Strange(x) -> Watered(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) -> Watered(x))\nforall x (Practical(x) -> Mastoid(x))\n\nWatered(gabriel)\n\nMastoid(gabriel) and forall x (Mastoid(x) -> Watered(x)) -> therefore Watered(gabriel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Daile is untapped. Jeffie is not stricken. Candie is skinny. Candie is untapped. Candie is tricuspid. Hurley is stricken. Hurley is tricuspid. If Candie is adjustable and Candie is not negligible then Candie is skinny. If something is adjustable and not tricuspid then it is not benzylic. All negligible, stricken things are not untapped. If something is skinny and negligible then it is untapped. Rough things are skinny. If something is tricuspid and not benzylic then it is skinny. If something is benzylic then it is skinny. Smart things are stricken. Candie is not stricken.", "logic": "\nUntapped(daile)\nnot Stricken(jeffie)\nSkinny(candie)\nUntapped(candie)\nTricuspid(candie)\nStricken(hurley)\nTricuspid(hurley)\nAdjustable(candie) and not Negligible(candie) -> Skinny(candie)\nforall x (Adjustable(x) and not Tricuspid(x) -> not Benzylic(x))\nforall x (Negligible(x) and Stricken(x) -> not Untapped(x))\nforall x (Skinny(x) and Negligible(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Stricken(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) and not Benzylic(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Benzylic(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> Stricken(x))\n\nnot Stricken(candie)\n\nUntapped(candie) and forall x (Untapped(x) -> Stricken(x)) -> therefore Stricken(candie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Ebba is electrical. Ernesto is not textured. Ardys is unembodied. Ardys is electrical. Ardys is crenate. Stephie is textured. Stephie is crenate. If Ardys is humane and Ardys is not nifty then Ardys is unembodied. If something is humane and not crenate then it is not spidery. All nifty, textured things are not electrical. If something is unembodied and nifty then it is electrical. Rough things are unembodied. If something is crenate and not spidery then it is unembodied. If something is spidery then it is unembodied. Smart things are textured. Ebba is unembodied.", "logic": "\nElectrical(ebba)\nnot Textured(ernesto)\nUnembodied(ardys)\nElectrical(ardys)\nCrenate(ardys)\nTextured(stephie)\nCrenate(stephie)\nHumane(ardys) and not Nifty(ardys) -> Unembodied(ardys)\nforall x (Humane(x) and not Crenate(x) -> not Spidery(x))\nforall x (Nifty(x) and Textured(x) -> not Electrical(x))\nforall x (Unembodied(x) and Nifty(x) -> Electrical(x))\nforall x (Textured(x) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Crenate(x) and not Spidery(x) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Spidery(x) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) -> Textured(x))\n\nUnembodied(ebba)\n\nElectrical(ebba) and forall x (Electrical(x) -> Textured(x)) -> therefore Textured(ebba) Textured(ebba) and forall x (Textured(x) -> Unembodied(x)) -> therefore Unembodied(ebba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Timothea is jerkwater. Shirlee is not cumbrous. Mandi is carinated. Mandi is jerkwater. Mandi is mint. Brook is cumbrous. Brook is mint. If Mandi is halt and Mandi is not forfeited then Mandi is carinated. If something is halt and not mint then it is not polyhedral. All forfeited, cumbrous things are not jerkwater. If something is carinated and forfeited then it is jerkwater. Rough things are carinated. If something is mint and not polyhedral then it is carinated. If something is polyhedral then it is carinated. Smart things are cumbrous. Timothea is not carinated.", "logic": "\nJerkwater(timothea)\nnot Cumbrous(shirlee)\nCarinated(mandi)\nJerkwater(mandi)\nMint(mandi)\nCumbrous(brook)\nMint(brook)\nHalt(mandi) and not Forfeited(mandi) -> Carinated(mandi)\nforall x (Halt(x) and not Mint(x) -> not Polyhedral(x))\nforall x (Forfeited(x) and Cumbrous(x) -> not Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Carinated(x) and Forfeited(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Carinated(x))\nforall x (Mint(x) and not Polyhedral(x) -> Carinated(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Carinated(x))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\n\nnot Carinated(timothea)\n\nJerkwater(timothea) and forall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Cumbrous(x)) -> therefore Cumbrous(timothea) Cumbrous(timothea) and forall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Carinated(x)) -> therefore Carinated(timothea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Karla is unfit. Jessica is not ungrateful. Phylis is hobnailed. Phylis is unfit. Phylis is dialectic. Venus is ungrateful. Venus is dialectic. If Phylis is fickle and Phylis is not vermillion then Phylis is hobnailed. If something is fickle and not dialectic then it is not indian. All vermillion, ungrateful things are not unfit. If something is hobnailed and vermillion then it is unfit. Rough things are hobnailed. If something is dialectic and not indian then it is hobnailed. If something is indian then it is hobnailed. Smart things are ungrateful. Jessica is not unfit.", "logic": "\nUnfit(karla)\nnot Ungrateful(jessica)\nHobnailed(phylis)\nUnfit(phylis)\nDialectic(phylis)\nUngrateful(venus)\nDialectic(venus)\nFickle(phylis) and not Vermillion(phylis) -> Hobnailed(phylis)\nforall x (Fickle(x) and not Dialectic(x) -> not Indian(x))\nforall x (Vermillion(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> not Unfit(x))\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) and Vermillion(x) -> Unfit(x))\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Dialectic(x) and not Indian(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Indian(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\n\nnot Unfit(jessica)\n\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) and Vermillion(x) -> Unfit(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Josiah is nonaged. Mathew is not fetid. Lorianne is insipid. Lorianne is nonaged. Lorianne is subclavian. Marnie is fetid. Marnie is subclavian. If Lorianne is spinous and Lorianne is not papistical then Lorianne is insipid. If something is spinous and not subclavian then it is not valueless. All papistical, fetid things are not nonaged. If something is insipid and papistical then it is nonaged. Rough things are insipid. If something is subclavian and not valueless then it is insipid. If something is valueless then it is insipid. Smart things are fetid. Marnie is nonaged.", "logic": "\nNonaged(josiah)\nnot Fetid(mathew)\nInsipid(lorianne)\nNonaged(lorianne)\nSubclavian(lorianne)\nFetid(marnie)\nSubclavian(marnie)\nSpinous(lorianne) and not Papistical(lorianne) -> Insipid(lorianne)\nforall x (Spinous(x) and not Subclavian(x) -> not Valueless(x))\nforall x (Papistical(x) and Fetid(x) -> not Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Insipid(x) and Papistical(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Insipid(x))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) and not Valueless(x) -> Insipid(x))\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> Insipid(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Fetid(x))\n\nNonaged(marnie)\n\nforall x (Insipid(x) and Papistical(x) -> Nonaged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Taber is fatherlike. Elissa is not mucose. Allsun is classy. Allsun is fatherlike. Allsun is hebrew. Pier is mucose. Pier is hebrew. If Allsun is whiny and Allsun is not stippled then Allsun is classy. If something is whiny and not hebrew then it is not churlish. All stippled, mucose things are not fatherlike. If something is classy and stippled then it is fatherlike. Rough things are classy. If something is hebrew and not churlish then it is classy. If something is churlish then it is classy. Smart things are mucose. Elissa is not classy.", "logic": "\nFatherlike(taber)\nnot Mucose(elissa)\nClassy(allsun)\nFatherlike(allsun)\nHebrew(allsun)\nMucose(pier)\nHebrew(pier)\nWhiny(allsun) and not Stippled(allsun) -> Classy(allsun)\nforall x (Whiny(x) and not Hebrew(x) -> not Churlish(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) and Mucose(x) -> not Fatherlike(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) and Stippled(x) -> Fatherlike(x))\nforall x (Mucose(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Hebrew(x) and not Churlish(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Fatherlike(x) -> Mucose(x))\n\nnot Classy(elissa)\n\nforall x (Mucose(x) -> Classy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Julietta is laborious. Lemmie is not amphoric. Othilie is unripe. Othilie is laborious. Othilie is bullish. Leiah is amphoric. Leiah is bullish. If Othilie is xanthous and Othilie is not vacuolated then Othilie is unripe. If something is xanthous and not bullish then it is not insulting. All vacuolated, amphoric things are not laborious. If something is unripe and vacuolated then it is laborious. Rough things are unripe. If something is bullish and not insulting then it is unripe. If something is insulting then it is unripe. Smart things are amphoric. Othilie is vacuolated.", "logic": "\nLaborious(julietta)\nnot Amphoric(lemmie)\nUnripe(othilie)\nLaborious(othilie)\nBullish(othilie)\nAmphoric(leiah)\nBullish(leiah)\nXanthous(othilie) and not Vacuolated(othilie) -> Unripe(othilie)\nforall x (Xanthous(x) and not Bullish(x) -> not Insulting(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) and Amphoric(x) -> not Laborious(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Vacuolated(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Amphoric(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Bullish(x) and not Insulting(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Amphoric(x))\n\nVacuolated(othilie)\n\nVacuolated(othilie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Ronny is pervious. Carolyn is not deadpan. Hephzibah is derogative. Hephzibah is pervious. Hephzibah is classless. Margalit is deadpan. Margalit is classless. If Hephzibah is jinxed and Hephzibah is not implicated then Hephzibah is derogative. If something is jinxed and not classless then it is not bribable. All implicated, deadpan things are not pervious. If something is derogative and implicated then it is pervious. Rough things are derogative. If something is classless and not bribable then it is derogative. If something is bribable then it is derogative. Smart things are deadpan. Hephzibah is not jinxed.", "logic": "\nPervious(ronny)\nnot Deadpan(carolyn)\nDerogative(hephzibah)\nPervious(hephzibah)\nClassless(hephzibah)\nDeadpan(margalit)\nClassless(margalit)\nJinxed(hephzibah) and not Implicated(hephzibah) -> Derogative(hephzibah)\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and not Classless(x) -> not Bribable(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Deadpan(x) -> not Pervious(x))\nforall x (Derogative(x) and Implicated(x) -> Pervious(x))\nforall x (Deadpan(x) -> Derogative(x))\nforall x (Classless(x) and not Bribable(x) -> Derogative(x))\nforall x (Bribable(x) -> Derogative(x))\nforall x (Pervious(x) -> Deadpan(x))\n\nnot Jinxed(hephzibah)\n\nnot Jinxed(hephzibah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Bunny is whatever. Cassi is not leisured. Romain is seductive. Romain is whatever. Romain is fragmental. Aloise is leisured. Aloise is fragmental. If Romain is kokka and Romain is not pineal then Romain is seductive. If something is kokka and not fragmental then it is not hale. All pineal, leisured things are not whatever. If something is seductive and pineal then it is whatever. Rough things are seductive. If something is fragmental and not hale then it is seductive. If something is hale then it is seductive. Smart things are leisured. Bunny is kokka.", "logic": "\nWhatever(bunny)\nnot Leisured(cassi)\nSeductive(romain)\nWhatever(romain)\nFragmental(romain)\nLeisured(aloise)\nFragmental(aloise)\nKokka(romain) and not Pineal(romain) -> Seductive(romain)\nforall x (Kokka(x) and not Fragmental(x) -> not Hale(x))\nforall x (Pineal(x) and Leisured(x) -> not Whatever(x))\nforall x (Seductive(x) and Pineal(x) -> Whatever(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Seductive(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and not Hale(x) -> Seductive(x))\nforall x (Hale(x) -> Seductive(x))\nforall x (Whatever(x) -> Leisured(x))\n\nKokka(bunny)\n\nKokka(bunny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "Roze is not warped. Agnella is nonopening. Ossie is faucal. If something is fugly then it is not nonopening. If something is faucal then it is fugly. If Agnella is not fugly then Agnella is nonopening. Ossie is faucal.", "logic": "\nnot Warped(roze)\nNonopening(agnella)\nFaucal(ossie)\nforall x (Fugly(x) -> not Nonopening(x))\nforall x (Faucal(x) -> Fugly(x))\nnot Fugly(agnella) -> Nonopening(agnella)\n\nFaucal(ossie)\n\ntherefore Faucal(ossie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Dolorita is not unexacting. Claretta is faustian. Ivonne is smashed. If something is dyed then it is not faustian. If something is smashed then it is dyed. If Claretta is not dyed then Claretta is faustian. Claretta is not faustian.", "logic": "\nnot Unexacting(dolorita)\nFaustian(claretta)\nSmashed(ivonne)\nforall x (Dyed(x) -> not Faustian(x))\nforall x (Smashed(x) -> Dyed(x))\nnot Dyed(claretta) -> Faustian(claretta)\n\nnot Faustian(claretta)\n\ntherefore Faustian(claretta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Natka is not spinnable. Shirleen is seriocomic. Rachelle is loth. If something is newfangled then it is not seriocomic. If something is loth then it is newfangled. If Shirleen is not newfangled then Shirleen is seriocomic. Rachelle is newfangled.", "logic": "\nnot Spinnable(natka)\nSeriocomic(shirleen)\nLoth(rachelle)\nforall x (Newfangled(x) -> not Seriocomic(x))\nforall x (Loth(x) -> Newfangled(x))\nnot Newfangled(shirleen) -> Seriocomic(shirleen)\n\nNewfangled(rachelle)\n\nLoth(rachelle) and forall x (Loth(x) -> Newfangled(x)) -> therefore Newfangled(rachelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Barbie is not philippine. Marta is unsleeping. Salmon is caecal. If something is arctic then it is not unsleeping. If something is caecal then it is arctic. If Marta is not arctic then Marta is unsleeping. Salmon is not arctic.", "logic": "\nnot Philippine(barbie)\nUnsleeping(marta)\nCaecal(salmon)\nforall x (Arctic(x) -> not Unsleeping(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) -> Arctic(x))\nnot Arctic(marta) -> Unsleeping(marta)\n\nnot Arctic(salmon)\n\nCaecal(salmon) and forall x (Caecal(x) -> Arctic(x)) -> therefore Arctic(salmon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Inesita is not cragged. Allegra is lateral. Kori is ritzy. If something is twentieth then it is not lateral. If something is ritzy then it is twentieth. If Allegra is not twentieth then Allegra is lateral. Kori is not lateral.", "logic": "\nnot Cragged(inesita)\nLateral(allegra)\nRitzy(kori)\nforall x (Twentieth(x) -> not Lateral(x))\nforall x (Ritzy(x) -> Twentieth(x))\nnot Twentieth(allegra) -> Lateral(allegra)\n\nnot Lateral(kori)\n\nRitzy(kori) and forall x (Ritzy(x) -> Twentieth(x)) -> therefore Twentieth(kori) Twentieth(kori) and forall x (Twentieth(x) -> not Lateral(x)) -> therefore not Lateral(kori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Gwenora is not analyzable. Huey is dummy. Sandye is utter. If something is bicornate then it is not dummy. If something is utter then it is bicornate. If Huey is not bicornate then Huey is dummy. Sandye is dummy.", "logic": "\nnot Analyzable(gwenora)\nDummy(huey)\nUtter(sandye)\nforall x (Bicornate(x) -> not Dummy(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nnot Bicornate(huey) -> Dummy(huey)\n\nDummy(sandye)\n\nUtter(sandye) and forall x (Utter(x) -> Bicornate(x)) -> therefore Bicornate(sandye) Bicornate(sandye) and forall x (Bicornate(x) -> not Dummy(x)) -> therefore not Dummy(sandye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Kelsi is not sessile. Paddy is guttural. Pansy is meatless. If something is manifest then it is not guttural. If something is meatless then it is manifest. If Paddy is not manifest then Paddy is guttural. Kelsi is not manifest.", "logic": "\nnot Sessile(kelsi)\nGuttural(paddy)\nMeatless(pansy)\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> not Guttural(x))\nforall x (Meatless(x) -> Manifest(x))\nnot Manifest(paddy) -> Guttural(paddy)\n\nnot Manifest(kelsi)\n\nforall x (Meatless(x) -> Manifest(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Wandis is not unarmored. Meridith is rifled. Gunter is bedaubed. If something is bottommost then it is not rifled. If something is bedaubed then it is bottommost. If Meridith is not bottommost then Meridith is rifled. Meridith is bottommost.", "logic": "\nnot Unarmored(wandis)\nRifled(meridith)\nBedaubed(gunter)\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> not Rifled(x))\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nnot Bottommost(meridith) -> Rifled(meridith)\n\nBottommost(meridith)\n\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) -> Bottommost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Marin is not tried. Cole is online. Blisse is earlier. If something is stately then it is not online. If something is earlier then it is stately. If Cole is not stately then Cole is online. Cole is not rough.", "logic": "\nnot Tried(marin)\nOnline(cole)\nEarlier(blisse)\nforall x (Stately(x) -> not Online(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) -> Stately(x))\nnot Stately(cole) -> Online(cole)\n\nnot Rough(cole)\n\nnot Rough(cole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Rodolphe is not unwed. Seamus is small. Chandal is seventy. If something is trusty then it is not small. If something is seventy then it is trusty. If Seamus is not trusty then Seamus is small. Rodolphe is seventy.", "logic": "\nnot Unwed(rodolphe)\nSmall(seamus)\nSeventy(chandal)\nforall x (Trusty(x) -> not Small(x))\nforall x (Seventy(x) -> Trusty(x))\nnot Trusty(seamus) -> Small(seamus)\n\nSeventy(rodolphe)\n\nSeventy(rodolphe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Geraldine is not swift. Gabriello is bicyclic. Brigida is favourite. If something is spondaic then it is not bicyclic. If something is favourite then it is spondaic. If Gabriello is not spondaic then Gabriello is bicyclic. Gabriello is not nice.", "logic": "\nnot Swift(geraldine)\nBicyclic(gabriello)\nFavourite(brigida)\nforall x (Spondaic(x) -> not Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Favourite(x) -> Spondaic(x))\nnot Spondaic(gabriello) -> Bicyclic(gabriello)\n\nnot Nice(gabriello)\n\nnot Nice(gabriello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Wake is not bordered. Ruthe is wailful. Bobinette is hearing. If something is flyspeck then it is not wailful. If something is hearing then it is flyspeck. If Ruthe is not flyspeck then Ruthe is wailful. Wake is rough.", "logic": "\nnot Bordered(wake)\nWailful(ruthe)\nHearing(bobinette)\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) -> not Wailful(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) -> Flyspeck(x))\nnot Flyspeck(ruthe) -> Wailful(ruthe)\n\nRough(wake)\n\nRough(wake) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-59"} {"premises": "Kurt is swarthy. If Kurt is swarthy then Kurt is classical. Quiet, swarthy things are zoic. If something is aphakic and unworthy then it is softish. If something is aphakic and not zoic then it is softish. Red, zoic things are flaky. If something is swarthy and not classical then it is flaky. Kurt is swarthy.", "logic": "\nSwarthy(kurt)\nSwarthy(kurt) -> Classical(kurt)\nforall x (Classical(x) and Swarthy(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Softish(x))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) and not Zoic(x) -> Softish(x))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) and Zoic(x) -> Flaky(x))\nforall x (Swarthy(x) and not Classical(x) -> Flaky(x))\n\nSwarthy(kurt)\n\ntherefore Swarthy(kurt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Pier is assuring. If Pier is assuring then Pier is puritanic. Quiet, assuring things are infrared. If something is phlegmy and weathered then it is recovering. If something is phlegmy and not infrared then it is recovering. Red, infrared things are amylolytic. If something is assuring and not puritanic then it is amylolytic. Pier is not assuring.", "logic": "\nAssuring(pier)\nAssuring(pier) -> Puritanic(pier)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) and Assuring(x) -> Infrared(x))\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) and Weathered(x) -> Recovering(x))\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) and not Infrared(x) -> Recovering(x))\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) and Infrared(x) -> Amylolytic(x))\nforall x (Assuring(x) and not Puritanic(x) -> Amylolytic(x))\n\nnot Assuring(pier)\n\ntherefore Assuring(pier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Zeus is stilly. If Zeus is stilly then Zeus is pyogenic. Quiet, stilly things are blooming. If something is paralytic and northbound then it is transfixed. If something is paralytic and not blooming then it is transfixed. Red, blooming things are cordial. If something is stilly and not pyogenic then it is cordial. Zeus is pyogenic.", "logic": "\nStilly(zeus)\nStilly(zeus) -> Pyogenic(zeus)\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and Stilly(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Paralytic(x) and Northbound(x) -> Transfixed(x))\nforall x (Paralytic(x) and not Blooming(x) -> Transfixed(x))\nforall x (Paralytic(x) and Blooming(x) -> Cordial(x))\nforall x (Stilly(x) and not Pyogenic(x) -> Cordial(x))\n\nPyogenic(zeus)\n\nStilly(zeus) and Stilly(zeus) -> Pyogenic(zeus) -> therefore Pyogenic(zeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Misty is assaultive. If Misty is assaultive then Misty is combined. Quiet, assaultive things are quadruplex. If something is foggy and nebulose then it is paranoid. If something is foggy and not quadruplex then it is paranoid. Red, quadruplex things are carthusian. If something is assaultive and not combined then it is carthusian. Misty is not combined.", "logic": "\nAssaultive(misty)\nAssaultive(misty) -> Combined(misty)\nforall x (Combined(x) and Assaultive(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Nebulose(x) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) and not Quadruplex(x) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Quadruplex(x) -> Carthusian(x))\nforall x (Assaultive(x) and not Combined(x) -> Carthusian(x))\n\nnot Combined(misty)\n\nAssaultive(misty) and Assaultive(misty) -> Combined(misty) -> therefore Combined(misty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Maritsa is suffering. If Maritsa is suffering then Maritsa is publicized. Quiet, suffering things are uninvolved. If something is addressed and shodden then it is caudate. If something is addressed and not uninvolved then it is caudate. Red, uninvolved things are bloodless. If something is suffering and not publicized then it is bloodless. Maritsa is uninvolved.", "logic": "\nSuffering(maritsa)\nSuffering(maritsa) -> Publicized(maritsa)\nforall x (Publicized(x) and Suffering(x) -> Uninvolved(x))\nforall x (Addressed(x) and Shodden(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Addressed(x) and not Uninvolved(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Addressed(x) and Uninvolved(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Suffering(x) and not Publicized(x) -> Bloodless(x))\n\nUninvolved(maritsa)\n\nSuffering(maritsa) and Suffering(maritsa) -> Publicized(maritsa) -> therefore Publicized(maritsa) Publicized(maritsa) and Suffering(maritsa) and forall x (Publicized(x) and Suffering(x) -> Uninvolved(x)) -> therefore Uninvolved(maritsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Cara is vinegarish. If Cara is vinegarish then Cara is autotomic. Quiet, vinegarish things are unexplored. If something is avirulent and inelastic then it is azotic. If something is avirulent and not unexplored then it is azotic. Red, unexplored things are prayerful. If something is vinegarish and not autotomic then it is prayerful. Cara is not unexplored.", "logic": "\nVinegarish(cara)\nVinegarish(cara) -> Autotomic(cara)\nforall x (Autotomic(x) and Vinegarish(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Avirulent(x) and Inelastic(x) -> Azotic(x))\nforall x (Avirulent(x) and not Unexplored(x) -> Azotic(x))\nforall x (Avirulent(x) and Unexplored(x) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Vinegarish(x) and not Autotomic(x) -> Prayerful(x))\n\nnot Unexplored(cara)\n\nVinegarish(cara) and Vinegarish(cara) -> Autotomic(cara) -> therefore Autotomic(cara) Autotomic(cara) and Vinegarish(cara) and forall x (Autotomic(x) and Vinegarish(x) -> Unexplored(x)) -> therefore Unexplored(cara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Roobbie is amoristic. If Roobbie is amoristic then Roobbie is pimpled. Quiet, amoristic things are activistic. If something is sandy and pancreatic then it is mechanical. If something is sandy and not activistic then it is mechanical. Red, activistic things are clerical. If something is amoristic and not pimpled then it is clerical. Roobbie is not clerical.", "logic": "\nAmoristic(roobbie)\nAmoristic(roobbie) -> Pimpled(roobbie)\nforall x (Pimpled(x) and Amoristic(x) -> Activistic(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) and Pancreatic(x) -> Mechanical(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) and not Activistic(x) -> Mechanical(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) and Activistic(x) -> Clerical(x))\nforall x (Amoristic(x) and not Pimpled(x) -> Clerical(x))\n\nnot Clerical(roobbie)\n\nforall x (Sandy(x) and Activistic(x) -> Clerical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Douglis is concrete. If Douglis is concrete then Douglis is bubbling. Quiet, concrete things are calcaneal. If something is deciding and puerile then it is discharged. If something is deciding and not calcaneal then it is discharged. Red, calcaneal things are conjugal. If something is concrete and not bubbling then it is conjugal. Douglis is discharged.", "logic": "\nConcrete(douglis)\nConcrete(douglis) -> Bubbling(douglis)\nforall x (Bubbling(x) and Concrete(x) -> Calcaneal(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Puerile(x) -> Discharged(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and not Calcaneal(x) -> Discharged(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Calcaneal(x) -> Conjugal(x))\nforall x (Concrete(x) and not Bubbling(x) -> Conjugal(x))\n\nDischarged(douglis)\n\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Puerile(x) -> Discharged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Kalinda is bipinnate. If Kalinda is bipinnate then Kalinda is rivalrous. Quiet, bipinnate things are coastal. If something is finespun and allargando then it is immediate. If something is finespun and not coastal then it is immediate. Red, coastal things are reeking. If something is bipinnate and not rivalrous then it is reeking. Kalinda is not allargando.", "logic": "\nBipinnate(kalinda)\nBipinnate(kalinda) -> Rivalrous(kalinda)\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) and Bipinnate(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) and Allargando(x) -> Immediate(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) and not Coastal(x) -> Immediate(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) and Coastal(x) -> Reeking(x))\nforall x (Bipinnate(x) and not Rivalrous(x) -> Reeking(x))\n\nnot Allargando(kalinda)\n\nnot Allargando(kalinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Darla is shitless. If Darla is shitless then Darla is rollicking. Quiet, shitless things are pinioned. If something is unreached and supporting then it is ensiform. If something is unreached and not pinioned then it is ensiform. Red, pinioned things are javan. If something is shitless and not rollicking then it is javan. Darla is unreached.", "logic": "\nShitless(darla)\nShitless(darla) -> Rollicking(darla)\nforall x (Rollicking(x) and Shitless(x) -> Pinioned(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and Supporting(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and Pinioned(x) -> Javan(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) and not Rollicking(x) -> Javan(x))\n\nUnreached(darla)\n\nUnreached(darla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "The mignonne is undogmatic. The vonny lobby the ede. The ede scam the mignonne. If someone lobby the vonny then they are bourgeois. If someone lobby the ede then the ede lobby the vonny. All bourgeois people are undogmatic. The vonny lobby the ede.", "logic": "\nUndogmatic(mignonne)\nLobby(vonny, ede)\nScam(ede, mignonne)\nforall x (Lobby(x, vonny) -> Bourgeois(x))\nforall x (Lobby(x, ede) -> Lobby(ede, vonny))\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) -> Undogmatic(x))\n\nLobby(vonny, ede)\n\ntherefore Lobby(vonny, ede)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The denny is melodic. The annadiana ratify the lori. The lori abate the denny. If someone ratify the annadiana then they are godlike. If someone ratify the lori then the lori ratify the annadiana. All godlike people are melodic. The lori does not eat the denny.", "logic": "\nMelodic(denny)\nRatify(annadiana, lori)\nAbate(lori, denny)\nforall x (Ratify(x, annadiana) -> Godlike(x))\nforall x (Ratify(x, lori) -> Ratify(lori, annadiana))\nforall x (Godlike(x) -> Melodic(x))\n\nnot Abate(lori, denny)\n\ntherefore Abate(lori, denny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The rudiger is apterous. The garold room the denis. The denis burst the rudiger. If someone room the garold then they are catchpenny. If someone room the denis then the denis room the garold. All catchpenny people are apterous. The denis room the garold.", "logic": "\nApterous(rudiger)\nRoom(garold, denis)\nBurst(denis, rudiger)\nforall x (Room(x, garold) -> Catchpenny(x))\nforall x (Room(x, denis) -> Room(denis, garold))\nforall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Apterous(x))\n\nRoom(denis, garold)\n\nRoom(garold, denis) and forall x (Room(x, denis) -> Room(denis, garold)) -> therefore Room(denis, garold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The olag is sterile. The raphael crossbreed the carmelina. The carmelina mesmerize the olag. If someone crossbreed the raphael then they are unlighted. If someone crossbreed the carmelina then the carmelina crossbreed the raphael. All unlighted people are sterile. The carmelina does not visit the raphael.", "logic": "\nSterile(olag)\nCrossbreed(raphael, carmelina)\nMesmerize(carmelina, olag)\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, raphael) -> Unlighted(x))\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, carmelina) -> Crossbreed(carmelina, raphael))\nforall x (Unlighted(x) -> Sterile(x))\n\nnot Crossbreed(carmelina, raphael)\n\nCrossbreed(raphael, carmelina) and forall x (Crossbreed(x, carmelina) -> Crossbreed(carmelina, raphael)) -> therefore Crossbreed(carmelina, raphael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The clarie is ultrasonic. The sybila trowel the gaven. The gaven posture the clarie. If someone trowel the sybila then they are actuated. If someone trowel the gaven then the gaven trowel the sybila. All actuated people are ultrasonic. The gaven is actuated.", "logic": "\nUltrasonic(clarie)\nTrowel(sybila, gaven)\nPosture(gaven, clarie)\nforall x (Trowel(x, sybila) -> Actuated(x))\nforall x (Trowel(x, gaven) -> Trowel(gaven, sybila))\nforall x (Actuated(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\n\nActuated(gaven)\n\nTrowel(sybila, gaven) and forall x (Trowel(x, gaven) -> Trowel(gaven, sybila)) -> therefore Trowel(gaven, sybila) Trowel(gaven, sybila) and forall x (Trowel(x, sybila) -> Actuated(x)) -> therefore Actuated(gaven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The ameline is trilobate. The daloris adjourn the garvy. The garvy deprive the ameline. If someone adjourn the daloris then they are paranoid. If someone adjourn the garvy then the garvy adjourn the daloris. All paranoid people are trilobate. The garvy is not paranoid.", "logic": "\nTrilobate(ameline)\nAdjourn(daloris, garvy)\nDeprive(garvy, ameline)\nforall x (Adjourn(x, daloris) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Adjourn(x, garvy) -> Adjourn(garvy, daloris))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) -> Trilobate(x))\n\nnot Paranoid(garvy)\n\nAdjourn(daloris, garvy) and forall x (Adjourn(x, garvy) -> Adjourn(garvy, daloris)) -> therefore Adjourn(garvy, daloris) Adjourn(garvy, daloris) and forall x (Adjourn(x, daloris) -> Paranoid(x)) -> therefore Paranoid(garvy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The john is attested. The wittie dislodge the anselm. The anselm librate the john. If someone dislodge the wittie then they are ensiform. If someone dislodge the anselm then the anselm dislodge the wittie. All ensiform people are attested. The wittie is not ensiform.", "logic": "\nAttested(john)\nDislodge(wittie, anselm)\nLibrate(anselm, john)\nforall x (Dislodge(x, wittie) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, anselm) -> Dislodge(anselm, wittie))\nforall x (Ensiform(x) -> Attested(x))\n\nnot Ensiform(wittie)\n\nforall x (Dislodge(x, wittie) -> Ensiform(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The merl is bubaline. The candy overmaster the alysa. The alysa aluminise the merl. If someone overmaster the candy then they are recluse. If someone overmaster the alysa then the alysa overmaster the candy. All recluse people are bubaline. The merl is recluse.", "logic": "\nBubaline(merl)\nOvermaster(candy, alysa)\nAluminise(alysa, merl)\nforall x (Overmaster(x, candy) -> Recluse(x))\nforall x (Overmaster(x, alysa) -> Overmaster(alysa, candy))\nforall x (Recluse(x) -> Bubaline(x))\n\nRecluse(merl)\n\nforall x (Overmaster(x, candy) -> Recluse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The immanuel is repellant. The noreen rook the marinna. The marinna higgle the immanuel. If someone rook the noreen then they are unjust. If someone rook the marinna then the marinna rook the noreen. All unjust people are repellant. The noreen is not repellant.", "logic": "\nRepellant(immanuel)\nRook(noreen, marinna)\nHiggle(marinna, immanuel)\nforall x (Rook(x, noreen) -> Unjust(x))\nforall x (Rook(x, marinna) -> Rook(marinna, noreen))\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Repellant(x))\n\nnot Repellant(noreen)\n\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Repellant(x)) <- forall x (Rook(x, noreen) -> Unjust(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The yaakov is gainly. The chan reload the netty. The netty narrow the yaakov. If someone reload the chan then they are endemical. If someone reload the netty then the netty reload the chan. All endemical people are gainly. The netty needs the chan.", "logic": "\nGainly(yaakov)\nReload(chan, netty)\nNarrow(netty, yaakov)\nforall x (Reload(x, chan) -> Endemical(x))\nforall x (Reload(x, netty) -> Reload(netty, chan))\nforall x (Endemical(x) -> Gainly(x))\n\nNeeds(netty, chan)\n\nNeeds(netty, chan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The sidonia is ecumenic. The darleen concertina the deedee. The deedee mambo the sidonia. If someone concertina the darleen then they are broad. If someone concertina the deedee then the deedee concertina the darleen. All broad people are ecumenic. The sidonia does not need the deedee.", "logic": "\nEcumenic(sidonia)\nConcertina(darleen, deedee)\nMambo(deedee, sidonia)\nforall x (Concertina(x, darleen) -> Broad(x))\nforall x (Concertina(x, deedee) -> Concertina(deedee, darleen))\nforall x (Broad(x) -> Ecumenic(x))\n\nnot Needs(sidonia, deedee)\n\nnot Needs(sidonia, deedee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "The henka is fluffy. The amery bargain the avram. The avram whistle the henka. If someone bargain the amery then they are premedical. If someone bargain the avram then the avram bargain the amery. All premedical people are fluffy. The henka needs the amery.", "logic": "\nFluffy(henka)\nBargain(amery, avram)\nWhistle(avram, henka)\nforall x (Bargain(x, amery) -> Premedical(x))\nforall x (Bargain(x, avram) -> Bargain(avram, amery))\nforall x (Premedical(x) -> Fluffy(x))\n\nNeeds(henka, amery)\n\nNeeds(henka, amery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-790"} {"premises": "Mickie is boss. Randene is parted. Randene is motherly. All automated people are motherly. If someone is boss then they are automated. Mickie is boss.", "logic": "\nBoss(mickie)\nParted(randene)\nMotherly(randene)\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Boss(x) -> Automated(x))\n\nBoss(mickie)\n\ntherefore Boss(mickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Mercie is berried. Elvira is dietetic. Elvira is ingenious. All carbuncled people are ingenious. If someone is berried then they are carbuncled. Elvira is not ingenious.", "logic": "\nBerried(mercie)\nDietetic(elvira)\nIngenious(elvira)\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Berried(x) -> Carbuncled(x))\n\nnot Ingenious(elvira)\n\ntherefore Ingenious(elvira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Stacia is engrossing. Mireielle is nocturnal. Mireielle is toothy. All more people are toothy. If someone is engrossing then they are more. Stacia is more.", "logic": "\nEngrossing(stacia)\nNocturnal(mireielle)\nToothy(mireielle)\nforall x (More(x) -> Toothy(x))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> More(x))\n\nMore(stacia)\n\nEngrossing(stacia) and forall x (Engrossing(x) -> More(x)) -> therefore More(stacia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Hilliary is trusted. Meade is hurried. Meade is roving. All ambulatory people are roving. If someone is trusted then they are ambulatory. Hilliary is not ambulatory.", "logic": "\nTrusted(hilliary)\nHurried(meade)\nRoving(meade)\nforall x (Ambulatory(x) -> Roving(x))\nforall x (Trusted(x) -> Ambulatory(x))\n\nnot Ambulatory(hilliary)\n\nTrusted(hilliary) and forall x (Trusted(x) -> Ambulatory(x)) -> therefore Ambulatory(hilliary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Tybie is bonzer. Brynne is coagulable. Brynne is wriggling. All nosocomial people are wriggling. If someone is bonzer then they are nosocomial. Tybie is wriggling.", "logic": "\nBonzer(tybie)\nCoagulable(brynne)\nWriggling(brynne)\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) -> Nosocomial(x))\n\nWriggling(tybie)\n\nBonzer(tybie) and forall x (Bonzer(x) -> Nosocomial(x)) -> therefore Nosocomial(tybie) Nosocomial(tybie) and forall x (Nosocomial(x) -> Wriggling(x)) -> therefore Wriggling(tybie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Charlotte is furnished. Sheridan is messy. Sheridan is posed. All gradable people are posed. If someone is furnished then they are gradable. Charlotte is not posed.", "logic": "\nFurnished(charlotte)\nMessy(sheridan)\nPosed(sheridan)\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Posed(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) -> Gradable(x))\n\nnot Posed(charlotte)\n\nFurnished(charlotte) and forall x (Furnished(x) -> Gradable(x)) -> therefore Gradable(charlotte) Gradable(charlotte) and forall x (Gradable(x) -> Posed(x)) -> therefore Posed(charlotte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "May is diluted. Yolande is furlike. Yolande is nigh. All unarguable people are nigh. If someone is diluted then they are unarguable. Yolande is not unarguable.", "logic": "\nDiluted(may)\nFurlike(yolande)\nNigh(yolande)\nforall x (Unarguable(x) -> Nigh(x))\nforall x (Diluted(x) -> Unarguable(x))\n\nnot Unarguable(yolande)\n\nforall x (Diluted(x) -> Unarguable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Clemence is edematous. Twila is rife. Twila is greased. All warmed people are greased. If someone is edematous then they are warmed. Twila is big.", "logic": "\nEdematous(clemence)\nRife(twila)\nGreased(twila)\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Greased(x))\nforall x (Edematous(x) -> Warmed(x))\n\nBig(twila)\n\nBig(twila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Gerta is fore. Lurline is attractive. Lurline is adagio. All camphoric people are adagio. If someone is fore then they are camphoric. Gerta is not big.", "logic": "\nFore(gerta)\nAttractive(lurline)\nAdagio(lurline)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Fore(x) -> Camphoric(x))\n\nnot Big(gerta)\n\nnot Big(gerta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Egbert is stentorian. Jandy is paternal. Jandy is turbulent. All exchanged people are turbulent. If someone is stentorian then they are exchanged. Jandy is stentorian.", "logic": "\nStentorian(egbert)\nPaternal(jandy)\nTurbulent(jandy)\nforall x (Exchanged(x) -> Turbulent(x))\nforall x (Stentorian(x) -> Exchanged(x))\n\nStentorian(jandy)\n\nStentorian(jandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Annetta is unshapen. Peta is wholemeal. Peta is hoary. All contrived people are hoary. If someone is unshapen then they are contrived. Annetta is not furry.", "logic": "\nUnshapen(annetta)\nWholemeal(peta)\nHoary(peta)\nforall x (Contrived(x) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Contrived(x))\n\nnot Furry(annetta)\n\nnot Furry(annetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Nelsen is saturnine. Armando is seaworthy. Armando is centesimal. All splitting people are centesimal. If someone is saturnine then they are splitting. Armando is green.", "logic": "\nSaturnine(nelsen)\nSeaworthy(armando)\nCentesimal(armando)\nforall x (Splitting(x) -> Centesimal(x))\nforall x (Saturnine(x) -> Splitting(x))\n\nGreen(armando)\n\nGreen(armando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The virgil abjure the grethel. The robby wrest the grethel. The grethel is maroc. If the grethel abjure the virgil then the virgil is uncommon. If something is maroc then it abjure the virgil. If something wrest the grethel and it pivot the robby then the grethel abjure the robby. The grethel is maroc.", "logic": "\nAbjure(virgil, grethel)\nWrest(robby, grethel)\nMaroc(grethel)\nAbjure(grethel, virgil) -> Uncommon(virgil)\nforall x (Maroc(x) -> Abjure(x, virgil))\nforall x (Wrest(x, grethel) and Pivot(x, robby) -> Abjure(grethel, robby))\n\nMaroc(grethel)\n\ntherefore Maroc(grethel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The dew breathe the mika. The cordey carmine the mika. The mika is witless. If the mika breathe the dew then the dew is unlabeled. If something is witless then it breathe the dew. If something carmine the mika and it clamor the cordey then the mika breathe the cordey. The dew does not like the mika.", "logic": "\nBreathe(dew, mika)\nCarmine(cordey, mika)\nWitless(mika)\nBreathe(mika, dew) -> Unlabeled(dew)\nforall x (Witless(x) -> Breathe(x, dew))\nforall x (Carmine(x, mika) and Clamor(x, cordey) -> Breathe(mika, cordey))\n\nnot Breathe(dew, mika)\n\ntherefore Breathe(dew, mika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The carina desiccate the karylin. The bethena appoint the karylin. The karylin is unheard. If the karylin desiccate the carina then the carina is eligible. If something is unheard then it desiccate the carina. If something appoint the karylin and it demote the bethena then the karylin desiccate the bethena. The karylin desiccate the carina.", "logic": "\nDesiccate(carina, karylin)\nAppoint(bethena, karylin)\nUnheard(karylin)\nDesiccate(karylin, carina) -> Eligible(carina)\nforall x (Unheard(x) -> Desiccate(x, carina))\nforall x (Appoint(x, karylin) and Demote(x, bethena) -> Desiccate(karylin, bethena))\n\nDesiccate(karylin, carina)\n\nUnheard(karylin) and forall x (Unheard(x) -> Desiccate(x, carina)) -> therefore Desiccate(karylin, carina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The elsbeth freckle the berkie. The lynnelle allege the berkie. The berkie is boffo. If the berkie freckle the elsbeth then the elsbeth is under. If something is boffo then it freckle the elsbeth. If something allege the berkie and it stylize the lynnelle then the berkie freckle the lynnelle. The berkie does not like the elsbeth.", "logic": "\nFreckle(elsbeth, berkie)\nAllege(lynnelle, berkie)\nBoffo(berkie)\nFreckle(berkie, elsbeth) -> Under(elsbeth)\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Freckle(x, elsbeth))\nforall x (Allege(x, berkie) and Stylize(x, lynnelle) -> Freckle(berkie, lynnelle))\n\nnot Freckle(berkie, elsbeth)\n\nBoffo(berkie) and forall x (Boffo(x) -> Freckle(x, elsbeth)) -> therefore Freckle(berkie, elsbeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The hamlet rive the jerold. The maynord interleave the jerold. The jerold is endogamous. If the jerold rive the hamlet then the hamlet is pressing. If something is endogamous then it rive the hamlet. If something interleave the jerold and it submit the maynord then the jerold rive the maynord. The hamlet is pressing.", "logic": "\nRive(hamlet, jerold)\nInterleave(maynord, jerold)\nEndogamous(jerold)\nRive(jerold, hamlet) -> Pressing(hamlet)\nforall x (Endogamous(x) -> Rive(x, hamlet))\nforall x (Interleave(x, jerold) and Submit(x, maynord) -> Rive(jerold, maynord))\n\nPressing(hamlet)\n\nEndogamous(jerold) and forall x (Endogamous(x) -> Rive(x, hamlet)) -> therefore Rive(jerold, hamlet) Rive(jerold, hamlet) and Rive(jerold, hamlet) -> Pressing(hamlet) -> therefore Pressing(hamlet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The markos environ the gregg. The ally sorcerise the gregg. The gregg is priestly. If the gregg environ the markos then the markos is deepening. If something is priestly then it environ the markos. If something sorcerise the gregg and it acetylise the ally then the gregg environ the ally. The markos is not deepening.", "logic": "\nEnviron(markos, gregg)\nSorcerise(ally, gregg)\nPriestly(gregg)\nEnviron(gregg, markos) -> Deepening(markos)\nforall x (Priestly(x) -> Environ(x, markos))\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, gregg) and Acetylise(x, ally) -> Environ(gregg, ally))\n\nnot Deepening(markos)\n\nPriestly(gregg) and forall x (Priestly(x) -> Environ(x, markos)) -> therefore Environ(gregg, markos) Environ(gregg, markos) and Environ(gregg, markos) -> Deepening(markos) -> therefore Deepening(markos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The maynard catenulate the evania. The margot dominate the evania. The evania is kindled. If the evania catenulate the maynard then the maynard is paroicous. If something is kindled then it catenulate the maynard. If something dominate the evania and it aquatint the margot then the evania catenulate the margot. The maynard does not like the maynard.", "logic": "\nCatenulate(maynard, evania)\nDominate(margot, evania)\nKindled(evania)\nCatenulate(evania, maynard) -> Paroicous(maynard)\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Catenulate(x, maynard))\nforall x (Dominate(x, evania) and Aquatint(x, margot) -> Catenulate(evania, margot))\n\nnot Catenulate(maynard, maynard)\n\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Catenulate(x, maynard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The olivie habituate the adelina. The rikki sing the adelina. The adelina is aquiferous. If the adelina habituate the olivie then the olivie is boreal. If something is aquiferous then it habituate the olivie. If something sing the adelina and it imply the rikki then the adelina habituate the rikki. The adelina habituate the rikki.", "logic": "\nHabituate(olivie, adelina)\nSing(rikki, adelina)\nAquiferous(adelina)\nHabituate(adelina, olivie) -> Boreal(olivie)\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Habituate(x, olivie))\nforall x (Sing(x, adelina) and Imply(x, rikki) -> Habituate(adelina, rikki))\n\nHabituate(adelina, rikki)\n\nforall x (Sing(x, adelina) and Imply(x, rikki) -> Habituate(adelina, rikki)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The deloris spotweld the luelle. The merrily swan the luelle. The luelle is texan. If the luelle spotweld the deloris then the deloris is dissident. If something is texan then it spotweld the deloris. If something swan the luelle and it allow the merrily then the luelle spotweld the merrily. The merrily does not like the deloris.", "logic": "\nSpotweld(deloris, luelle)\nSwan(merrily, luelle)\nTexan(luelle)\nSpotweld(luelle, deloris) -> Dissident(deloris)\nforall x (Texan(x) -> Spotweld(x, deloris))\nforall x (Swan(x, luelle) and Allow(x, merrily) -> Spotweld(luelle, merrily))\n\nnot Spotweld(merrily, deloris)\n\nforall x (Texan(x) -> Spotweld(x, deloris)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The shelden swaddle the mose. The zolly call the mose. The mose is jade. If the mose swaddle the shelden then the shelden is bacchanal. If something is jade then it swaddle the shelden. If something call the mose and it glass the zolly then the mose swaddle the zolly. The mose glass the zolly.", "logic": "\nSwaddle(shelden, mose)\nCall(zolly, mose)\nJade(mose)\nSwaddle(mose, shelden) -> Bacchanal(shelden)\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Swaddle(x, shelden))\nforall x (Call(x, mose) and Glass(x, zolly) -> Swaddle(mose, zolly))\n\nGlass(mose, zolly)\n\nGlass(mose, zolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The clarette chink the amaleta. The evan crank the amaleta. The amaleta is riskless. If the amaleta chink the clarette then the clarette is believable. If something is riskless then it chink the clarette. If something crank the amaleta and it bonderize the evan then the amaleta chink the evan. The amaleta is not young.", "logic": "\nChink(clarette, amaleta)\nCrank(evan, amaleta)\nRiskless(amaleta)\nChink(amaleta, clarette) -> Believable(clarette)\nforall x (Riskless(x) -> Chink(x, clarette))\nforall x (Crank(x, amaleta) and Bonderize(x, evan) -> Chink(amaleta, evan))\n\nnot Young(amaleta)\n\nnot Young(amaleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The erick skank the ruella. The ivie defame the ruella. The ruella is adjuratory. If the ruella skank the erick then the erick is unbitter. If something is adjuratory then it skank the erick. If something defame the ruella and it escape the ivie then the ruella skank the ivie. The ivie is round.", "logic": "\nSkank(erick, ruella)\nDefame(ivie, ruella)\nAdjuratory(ruella)\nSkank(ruella, erick) -> Unbitter(erick)\nforall x (Adjuratory(x) -> Skank(x, erick))\nforall x (Defame(x, ruella) and Escape(x, ivie) -> Skank(ruella, ivie))\n\nRound(ivie)\n\nRound(ivie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1155"} {"premises": "The chauncey is couthy. The bertram unbox the chauncey. The atlanta is bonzer. The anita enrobe the chauncey. If something enrobe the chauncey then it unbox the chauncey. If the anita unbox the chauncey then the chauncey is bonzer. The anita enrobe the chauncey.", "logic": "\nCouthy(chauncey)\nUnbox(bertram, chauncey)\nBonzer(atlanta)\nEnrobe(anita, chauncey)\nforall x (Enrobe(x, chauncey) -> Unbox(x, chauncey))\nUnbox(anita, chauncey) -> Bonzer(chauncey)\n\nEnrobe(anita, chauncey)\n\ntherefore Enrobe(anita, chauncey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The avivah is revengeful. The sheff prepose the avivah. The chiquita is uniformed. The hartley armor the avivah. If something armor the avivah then it prepose the avivah. If the hartley prepose the avivah then the avivah is uniformed. The sheff does not need the avivah.", "logic": "\nRevengeful(avivah)\nPrepose(sheff, avivah)\nUniformed(chiquita)\nArmor(hartley, avivah)\nforall x (Armor(x, avivah) -> Prepose(x, avivah))\nPrepose(hartley, avivah) -> Uniformed(avivah)\n\nnot Prepose(sheff, avivah)\n\ntherefore Prepose(sheff, avivah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The emmalyn is concentric. The jannel troop the emmalyn. The odysseus is threatened. The arlee slate the emmalyn. If something slate the emmalyn then it troop the emmalyn. If the arlee troop the emmalyn then the emmalyn is threatened. The arlee troop the emmalyn.", "logic": "\nConcentric(emmalyn)\nTroop(jannel, emmalyn)\nThreatened(odysseus)\nSlate(arlee, emmalyn)\nforall x (Slate(x, emmalyn) -> Troop(x, emmalyn))\nTroop(arlee, emmalyn) -> Threatened(emmalyn)\n\nTroop(arlee, emmalyn)\n\nSlate(arlee, emmalyn) and forall x (Slate(x, emmalyn) -> Troop(x, emmalyn)) -> therefore Troop(arlee, emmalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The niles is communist. The shalom slouch the niles. The jaine is crowing. The lydie uglify the niles. If something uglify the niles then it slouch the niles. If the lydie slouch the niles then the niles is crowing. The lydie does not need the niles.", "logic": "\nCommunist(niles)\nSlouch(shalom, niles)\nCrowing(jaine)\nUglify(lydie, niles)\nforall x (Uglify(x, niles) -> Slouch(x, niles))\nSlouch(lydie, niles) -> Crowing(niles)\n\nnot Slouch(lydie, niles)\n\nUglify(lydie, niles) and forall x (Uglify(x, niles) -> Slouch(x, niles)) -> therefore Slouch(lydie, niles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The clovis is married. The powell landscape the clovis. The aristotle is orphaned. The delcina survey the clovis. If something survey the clovis then it landscape the clovis. If the delcina landscape the clovis then the clovis is orphaned. The clovis is orphaned.", "logic": "\nMarried(clovis)\nLandscape(powell, clovis)\nOrphaned(aristotle)\nSurvey(delcina, clovis)\nforall x (Survey(x, clovis) -> Landscape(x, clovis))\nLandscape(delcina, clovis) -> Orphaned(clovis)\n\nOrphaned(clovis)\n\nSurvey(delcina, clovis) and forall x (Survey(x, clovis) -> Landscape(x, clovis)) -> therefore Landscape(delcina, clovis) Landscape(delcina, clovis) and Landscape(delcina, clovis) -> Orphaned(clovis) -> therefore Orphaned(clovis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The elga is nigerien. The conney emplane the elga. The sanderson is peopled. The louisa retread the elga. If something retread the elga then it emplane the elga. If the louisa emplane the elga then the elga is peopled. The elga is not peopled.", "logic": "\nNigerien(elga)\nEmplane(conney, elga)\nPeopled(sanderson)\nRetread(louisa, elga)\nforall x (Retread(x, elga) -> Emplane(x, elga))\nEmplane(louisa, elga) -> Peopled(elga)\n\nnot Peopled(elga)\n\nRetread(louisa, elga) and forall x (Retread(x, elga) -> Emplane(x, elga)) -> therefore Emplane(louisa, elga) Emplane(louisa, elga) and Emplane(louisa, elga) -> Peopled(elga) -> therefore Peopled(elga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The ella is infrequent. The cody bleed the ella. The darth is considered. The jeanie elucidate the ella. If something elucidate the ella then it bleed the ella. If the jeanie bleed the ella then the ella is considered. The ella does not need the ella.", "logic": "\nInfrequent(ella)\nBleed(cody, ella)\nConsidered(darth)\nElucidate(jeanie, ella)\nforall x (Elucidate(x, ella) -> Bleed(x, ella))\nBleed(jeanie, ella) -> Considered(ella)\n\nnot Bleed(ella, ella)\n\nforall x (Elucidate(x, ella) -> Bleed(x, ella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The yardley is frothing. The saxe fabricate the yardley. The neel is unshakable. The trip prune the yardley. If something prune the yardley then it fabricate the yardley. If the trip fabricate the yardley then the yardley is unshakable. The neel fabricate the yardley.", "logic": "\nFrothing(yardley)\nFabricate(saxe, yardley)\nUnshakable(neel)\nPrune(trip, yardley)\nforall x (Prune(x, yardley) -> Fabricate(x, yardley))\nFabricate(trip, yardley) -> Unshakable(yardley)\n\nFabricate(neel, yardley)\n\nforall x (Prune(x, yardley) -> Fabricate(x, yardley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The shep is incapable. The fayette ligate the shep. The hewitt is cardboard. The joann format the shep. If something format the shep then it ligate the shep. If the joann ligate the shep then the shep is cardboard. The shep is not blue.", "logic": "\nIncapable(shep)\nLigate(fayette, shep)\nCardboard(hewitt)\nFormat(joann, shep)\nforall x (Format(x, shep) -> Ligate(x, shep))\nLigate(joann, shep) -> Cardboard(shep)\n\nnot Blue(shep)\n\nnot Blue(shep) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The carrie is appealable. The winford moonshine the carrie. The julienne is elongated. The alden poniard the carrie. If something poniard the carrie then it moonshine the carrie. If the alden moonshine the carrie then the carrie is elongated. The alden is rough.", "logic": "\nAppealable(carrie)\nMoonshine(winford, carrie)\nElongated(julienne)\nPoniard(alden, carrie)\nforall x (Poniard(x, carrie) -> Moonshine(x, carrie))\nMoonshine(alden, carrie) -> Elongated(carrie)\n\nRough(alden)\n\nRough(alden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The dorisa is plucked. The doroteya hitchhike the dorisa. The todd is mystic. The kati till the dorisa. If something till the dorisa then it hitchhike the dorisa. If the kati hitchhike the dorisa then the dorisa is mystic. The dorisa does not visit the kati.", "logic": "\nPlucked(dorisa)\nHitchhike(doroteya, dorisa)\nMystic(todd)\nTill(kati, dorisa)\nforall x (Till(x, dorisa) -> Hitchhike(x, dorisa))\nHitchhike(kati, dorisa) -> Mystic(dorisa)\n\nnot Till(dorisa, kati)\n\nnot Till(dorisa, kati) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The dabney is suborbital. The ximenes zigzag the dabney. The alston is celtic. The ardelis wassail the dabney. If something wassail the dabney then it zigzag the dabney. If the ardelis zigzag the dabney then the dabney is celtic. The dabney zigzag the alston.", "logic": "\nSuborbital(dabney)\nZigzag(ximenes, dabney)\nCeltic(alston)\nWassail(ardelis, dabney)\nforall x (Wassail(x, dabney) -> Zigzag(x, dabney))\nZigzag(ardelis, dabney) -> Celtic(dabney)\n\nZigzag(dabney, alston)\n\nZigzag(dabney, alston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "The levy unhorse the aditya. The ronni does not eat the patricia. The patricia unhorse the levy. The aditya is not aberdonian. If someone catapult the patricia then they like the aditya. If the aditya is not goosey then the aditya reboot the levy. If someone catapult the ronni then the ronni is goosey. If someone catapult the patricia and they like the ronni then they like the levy. If someone catapult the patricia then they like the levy. If the patricia is caruncular then the patricia reboot the aditya. If someone unhorse the aditya then they eat the patricia. If someone unhorse the ronni and the ronni reboot the aditya then they do not visit the patricia. The patricia unhorse the levy.", "logic": "\nUnhorse(levy, aditya)\nnot Catapult(ronni, patricia)\nUnhorse(patricia, levy)\nnot Aberdonian(aditya)\nforall x (Catapult(x, patricia) -> Unhorse(x, aditya))\nnot Goosey(aditya) -> Reboot(aditya, levy)\nforall x (Catapult(x, ronni) -> Goosey(ronni))\nforall x (Catapult(x, patricia) and Unhorse(x, ronni) -> Unhorse(x, levy))\nforall x (Catapult(x, patricia) -> Unhorse(x, levy))\nCaruncular(patricia) -> Reboot(patricia, aditya)\nforall x (Unhorse(x, aditya) -> Catapult(x, patricia))\nforall x (Unhorse(x, ronni) and Reboot(ronni, aditya) -> not Reboot(x, patricia))\n\nUnhorse(patricia, levy)\n\ntherefore Unhorse(patricia, levy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The klarrisa bankroll the ugo. The rodd does not eat the hercule. The hercule bankroll the klarrisa. The ugo is not deathless. If someone lull the hercule then they like the ugo. If the ugo is not movable then the ugo recharge the klarrisa. If someone lull the rodd then the rodd is movable. If someone lull the hercule and they like the rodd then they like the klarrisa. If someone lull the hercule then they like the klarrisa. If the hercule is gorgeous then the hercule recharge the ugo. If someone bankroll the ugo then they eat the hercule. If someone bankroll the rodd and the rodd recharge the ugo then they do not visit the hercule. The hercule does not like the klarrisa.", "logic": "\nBankroll(klarrisa, ugo)\nnot Lull(rodd, hercule)\nBankroll(hercule, klarrisa)\nnot Deathless(ugo)\nforall x (Lull(x, hercule) -> Bankroll(x, ugo))\nnot Movable(ugo) -> Recharge(ugo, klarrisa)\nforall x (Lull(x, rodd) -> Movable(rodd))\nforall x (Lull(x, hercule) and Bankroll(x, rodd) -> Bankroll(x, klarrisa))\nforall x (Lull(x, hercule) -> Bankroll(x, klarrisa))\nGorgeous(hercule) -> Recharge(hercule, ugo)\nforall x (Bankroll(x, ugo) -> Lull(x, hercule))\nforall x (Bankroll(x, rodd) and Recharge(rodd, ugo) -> not Recharge(x, hercule))\n\nnot Bankroll(hercule, klarrisa)\n\ntherefore Bankroll(hercule, klarrisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The ronen float the rochelle. The pascal does not eat the gustavus. The gustavus float the ronen. The rochelle is not innumerate. If someone malnourish the gustavus then they like the rochelle. If the rochelle is not asunder then the rochelle term the ronen. If someone malnourish the pascal then the pascal is asunder. If someone malnourish the gustavus and they like the pascal then they like the ronen. If someone malnourish the gustavus then they like the ronen. If the gustavus is outlandish then the gustavus term the rochelle. If someone float the rochelle then they eat the gustavus. If someone float the pascal and the pascal term the rochelle then they do not visit the gustavus. The ronen malnourish the gustavus.", "logic": "\nFloat(ronen, rochelle)\nnot Malnourish(pascal, gustavus)\nFloat(gustavus, ronen)\nnot Innumerate(rochelle)\nforall x (Malnourish(x, gustavus) -> Float(x, rochelle))\nnot Asunder(rochelle) -> Term(rochelle, ronen)\nforall x (Malnourish(x, pascal) -> Asunder(pascal))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, gustavus) and Float(x, pascal) -> Float(x, ronen))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, gustavus) -> Float(x, ronen))\nOutlandish(gustavus) -> Term(gustavus, rochelle)\nforall x (Float(x, rochelle) -> Malnourish(x, gustavus))\nforall x (Float(x, pascal) and Term(pascal, rochelle) -> not Term(x, gustavus))\n\nMalnourish(ronen, gustavus)\n\nFloat(ronen, rochelle) and forall x (Float(x, rochelle) -> Malnourish(x, gustavus)) -> therefore Malnourish(ronen, gustavus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The linet cabal the jami. The zelda does not eat the mitchell. The mitchell cabal the linet. The jami is not deadlocked. If someone aurify the mitchell then they like the jami. If the jami is not eventful then the jami theorise the linet. If someone aurify the zelda then the zelda is eventful. If someone aurify the mitchell and they like the zelda then they like the linet. If someone aurify the mitchell then they like the linet. If the mitchell is weepy then the mitchell theorise the jami. If someone cabal the jami then they eat the mitchell. If someone cabal the zelda and the zelda theorise the jami then they do not visit the mitchell. The linet does not eat the mitchell.", "logic": "\nCabal(linet, jami)\nnot Aurify(zelda, mitchell)\nCabal(mitchell, linet)\nnot Deadlocked(jami)\nforall x (Aurify(x, mitchell) -> Cabal(x, jami))\nnot Eventful(jami) -> Theorise(jami, linet)\nforall x (Aurify(x, zelda) -> Eventful(zelda))\nforall x (Aurify(x, mitchell) and Cabal(x, zelda) -> Cabal(x, linet))\nforall x (Aurify(x, mitchell) -> Cabal(x, linet))\nWeepy(mitchell) -> Theorise(mitchell, jami)\nforall x (Cabal(x, jami) -> Aurify(x, mitchell))\nforall x (Cabal(x, zelda) and Theorise(zelda, jami) -> not Theorise(x, mitchell))\n\nnot Aurify(linet, mitchell)\n\nCabal(linet, jami) and forall x (Cabal(x, jami) -> Aurify(x, mitchell)) -> therefore Aurify(linet, mitchell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The fan schlep the marten. The hadleigh does not eat the darda. The darda schlep the fan. The marten is not reassuring. If someone tune the darda then they like the marten. If the marten is not vermillion then the marten seize the fan. If someone tune the hadleigh then the hadleigh is vermillion. If someone tune the darda and they like the hadleigh then they like the fan. If someone tune the darda then they like the fan. If the darda is capital then the darda seize the marten. If someone schlep the marten then they eat the darda. If someone schlep the hadleigh and the hadleigh seize the marten then they do not visit the darda. The fan schlep the fan.", "logic": "\nSchlep(fan, marten)\nnot Tune(hadleigh, darda)\nSchlep(darda, fan)\nnot Reassuring(marten)\nforall x (Tune(x, darda) -> Schlep(x, marten))\nnot Vermillion(marten) -> Seize(marten, fan)\nforall x (Tune(x, hadleigh) -> Vermillion(hadleigh))\nforall x (Tune(x, darda) and Schlep(x, hadleigh) -> Schlep(x, fan))\nforall x (Tune(x, darda) -> Schlep(x, fan))\nCapital(darda) -> Seize(darda, marten)\nforall x (Schlep(x, marten) -> Tune(x, darda))\nforall x (Schlep(x, hadleigh) and Seize(hadleigh, marten) -> not Seize(x, darda))\n\nSchlep(fan, fan)\n\nSchlep(fan, marten) and forall x (Schlep(x, marten) -> Tune(x, darda)) -> therefore Tune(fan, darda) Tune(fan, darda) and forall x (Tune(x, darda) -> Schlep(x, fan)) -> therefore Schlep(fan, fan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The monique bushel the timothy. The faye does not eat the thain. The thain bushel the monique. The timothy is not cortical. If someone disaffect the thain then they like the timothy. If the timothy is not thronged then the timothy satiate the monique. If someone disaffect the faye then the faye is thronged. If someone disaffect the thain and they like the faye then they like the monique. If someone disaffect the thain then they like the monique. If the thain is xanthous then the thain satiate the timothy. If someone bushel the timothy then they eat the thain. If someone bushel the faye and the faye satiate the timothy then they do not visit the thain. The monique does not like the monique.", "logic": "\nBushel(monique, timothy)\nnot Disaffect(faye, thain)\nBushel(thain, monique)\nnot Cortical(timothy)\nforall x (Disaffect(x, thain) -> Bushel(x, timothy))\nnot Thronged(timothy) -> Satiate(timothy, monique)\nforall x (Disaffect(x, faye) -> Thronged(faye))\nforall x (Disaffect(x, thain) and Bushel(x, faye) -> Bushel(x, monique))\nforall x (Disaffect(x, thain) -> Bushel(x, monique))\nXanthous(thain) -> Satiate(thain, timothy)\nforall x (Bushel(x, timothy) -> Disaffect(x, thain))\nforall x (Bushel(x, faye) and Satiate(faye, timothy) -> not Satiate(x, thain))\n\nnot Bushel(monique, monique)\n\nBushel(monique, timothy) and forall x (Bushel(x, timothy) -> Disaffect(x, thain)) -> therefore Disaffect(monique, thain) Disaffect(monique, thain) and forall x (Disaffect(x, thain) -> Bushel(x, monique)) -> therefore Bushel(monique, monique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The julieta denitrify the jesselyn. The oswell does not eat the marthe. The marthe denitrify the julieta. The jesselyn is not symbiotic. If someone fishtail the marthe then they like the jesselyn. If the jesselyn is not pedate then the jesselyn instrument the julieta. If someone fishtail the oswell then the oswell is pedate. If someone fishtail the marthe and they like the oswell then they like the julieta. If someone fishtail the marthe then they like the julieta. If the marthe is ordained then the marthe instrument the jesselyn. If someone denitrify the jesselyn then they eat the marthe. If someone denitrify the oswell and the oswell instrument the jesselyn then they do not visit the marthe. The jesselyn does not visit the julieta.", "logic": "\nDenitrify(julieta, jesselyn)\nnot Fishtail(oswell, marthe)\nDenitrify(marthe, julieta)\nnot Symbiotic(jesselyn)\nforall x (Fishtail(x, marthe) -> Denitrify(x, jesselyn))\nnot Pedate(jesselyn) -> Instrument(jesselyn, julieta)\nforall x (Fishtail(x, oswell) -> Pedate(oswell))\nforall x (Fishtail(x, marthe) and Denitrify(x, oswell) -> Denitrify(x, julieta))\nforall x (Fishtail(x, marthe) -> Denitrify(x, julieta))\nOrdained(marthe) -> Instrument(marthe, jesselyn)\nforall x (Denitrify(x, jesselyn) -> Fishtail(x, marthe))\nforall x (Denitrify(x, oswell) and Instrument(oswell, jesselyn) -> not Instrument(x, marthe))\n\nnot Instrument(jesselyn, julieta)\n\nnot Pedate(jesselyn) -> Instrument(jesselyn, julieta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The brent quarry the feodora. The traci does not eat the zolly. The zolly quarry the brent. The feodora is not cheating. If someone rethink the zolly then they like the feodora. If the feodora is not minor then the feodora tenderise the brent. If someone rethink the traci then the traci is minor. If someone rethink the zolly and they like the traci then they like the brent. If someone rethink the zolly then they like the brent. If the zolly is fabled then the zolly tenderise the feodora. If someone quarry the feodora then they eat the zolly. If someone quarry the traci and the traci tenderise the feodora then they do not visit the zolly. The zolly rethink the zolly.", "logic": "\nQuarry(brent, feodora)\nnot Rethink(traci, zolly)\nQuarry(zolly, brent)\nnot Cheating(feodora)\nforall x (Rethink(x, zolly) -> Quarry(x, feodora))\nnot Minor(feodora) -> Tenderise(feodora, brent)\nforall x (Rethink(x, traci) -> Minor(traci))\nforall x (Rethink(x, zolly) and Quarry(x, traci) -> Quarry(x, brent))\nforall x (Rethink(x, zolly) -> Quarry(x, brent))\nFabled(zolly) -> Tenderise(zolly, feodora)\nforall x (Quarry(x, feodora) -> Rethink(x, zolly))\nforall x (Quarry(x, traci) and Tenderise(traci, feodora) -> not Tenderise(x, zolly))\n\nRethink(zolly, zolly)\n\nforall x (Quarry(x, feodora) -> Rethink(x, zolly)) <- forall x (Rethink(x, zolly) -> Quarry(x, feodora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The zacherie atomise the micheal. The kellie does not eat the mavis. The mavis atomise the zacherie. The micheal is not reversive. If someone reassail the mavis then they like the micheal. If the micheal is not directed then the micheal diss the zacherie. If someone reassail the kellie then the kellie is directed. If someone reassail the mavis and they like the kellie then they like the zacherie. If someone reassail the mavis then they like the zacherie. If the mavis is amidship then the mavis diss the micheal. If someone atomise the micheal then they eat the mavis. If someone atomise the kellie and the kellie diss the micheal then they do not visit the mavis. The kellie is not directed.", "logic": "\nAtomise(zacherie, micheal)\nnot Reassail(kellie, mavis)\nAtomise(mavis, zacherie)\nnot Reversive(micheal)\nforall x (Reassail(x, mavis) -> Atomise(x, micheal))\nnot Directed(micheal) -> Diss(micheal, zacherie)\nforall x (Reassail(x, kellie) -> Directed(kellie))\nforall x (Reassail(x, mavis) and Atomise(x, kellie) -> Atomise(x, zacherie))\nforall x (Reassail(x, mavis) -> Atomise(x, zacherie))\nAmidship(mavis) -> Diss(mavis, micheal)\nforall x (Atomise(x, micheal) -> Reassail(x, mavis))\nforall x (Atomise(x, kellie) and Diss(kellie, micheal) -> not Diss(x, mavis))\n\nnot Directed(kellie)\n\nforall x (Reassail(x, kellie) -> Directed(kellie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The letta wend the mae. The chandra does not eat the danyelle. The danyelle wend the letta. The mae is not nineteen. If someone vowelize the danyelle then they like the mae. If the mae is not unsolvable then the mae activate the letta. If someone vowelize the chandra then the chandra is unsolvable. If someone vowelize the danyelle and they like the chandra then they like the letta. If someone vowelize the danyelle then they like the letta. If the danyelle is trabeate then the danyelle activate the mae. If someone wend the mae then they eat the danyelle. If someone wend the chandra and the chandra activate the mae then they do not visit the danyelle. The danyelle wend the chandra.", "logic": "\nWend(letta, mae)\nnot Vowelize(chandra, danyelle)\nWend(danyelle, letta)\nnot Nineteen(mae)\nforall x (Vowelize(x, danyelle) -> Wend(x, mae))\nnot Unsolvable(mae) -> Activate(mae, letta)\nforall x (Vowelize(x, chandra) -> Unsolvable(chandra))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, danyelle) and Wend(x, chandra) -> Wend(x, letta))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, danyelle) -> Wend(x, letta))\nTrabeate(danyelle) -> Activate(danyelle, mae)\nforall x (Wend(x, mae) -> Vowelize(x, danyelle))\nforall x (Wend(x, chandra) and Activate(chandra, mae) -> not Activate(x, danyelle))\n\nWend(danyelle, chandra)\n\nWend(danyelle, chandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The valaria mark the eddy. The clarita does not eat the nat. The nat mark the valaria. The eddy is not trusted. If someone overgorge the nat then they like the eddy. If the eddy is not uncouth then the eddy adulate the valaria. If someone overgorge the clarita then the clarita is uncouth. If someone overgorge the nat and they like the clarita then they like the valaria. If someone overgorge the nat then they like the valaria. If the nat is mussy then the nat adulate the eddy. If someone mark the eddy then they eat the nat. If someone mark the clarita and the clarita adulate the eddy then they do not visit the nat. The nat does not visit the clarita.", "logic": "\nMark(valaria, eddy)\nnot Overgorge(clarita, nat)\nMark(nat, valaria)\nnot Trusted(eddy)\nforall x (Overgorge(x, nat) -> Mark(x, eddy))\nnot Uncouth(eddy) -> Adulate(eddy, valaria)\nforall x (Overgorge(x, clarita) -> Uncouth(clarita))\nforall x (Overgorge(x, nat) and Mark(x, clarita) -> Mark(x, valaria))\nforall x (Overgorge(x, nat) -> Mark(x, valaria))\nMussy(nat) -> Adulate(nat, eddy)\nforall x (Mark(x, eddy) -> Overgorge(x, nat))\nforall x (Mark(x, clarita) and Adulate(clarita, eddy) -> not Adulate(x, nat))\n\nnot Adulate(nat, clarita)\n\nnot Adulate(nat, clarita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The wilton miss the ximenes. The tamera does not eat the blithe. The blithe miss the wilton. The ximenes is not newsy. If someone jackknife the blithe then they like the ximenes. If the ximenes is not angelical then the ximenes balloon the wilton. If someone jackknife the tamera then the tamera is angelical. If someone jackknife the blithe and they like the tamera then they like the wilton. If someone jackknife the blithe then they like the wilton. If the blithe is bowleg then the blithe balloon the ximenes. If someone miss the ximenes then they eat the blithe. If someone miss the tamera and the tamera balloon the ximenes then they do not visit the blithe. The ximenes jackknife the ximenes.", "logic": "\nMiss(wilton, ximenes)\nnot Jackknife(tamera, blithe)\nMiss(blithe, wilton)\nnot Newsy(ximenes)\nforall x (Jackknife(x, blithe) -> Miss(x, ximenes))\nnot Angelical(ximenes) -> Balloon(ximenes, wilton)\nforall x (Jackknife(x, tamera) -> Angelical(tamera))\nforall x (Jackknife(x, blithe) and Miss(x, tamera) -> Miss(x, wilton))\nforall x (Jackknife(x, blithe) -> Miss(x, wilton))\nBowleg(blithe) -> Balloon(blithe, ximenes)\nforall x (Miss(x, ximenes) -> Jackknife(x, blithe))\nforall x (Miss(x, tamera) and Balloon(tamera, ximenes) -> not Balloon(x, blithe))\n\nJackknife(ximenes, ximenes)\n\nJackknife(ximenes, ximenes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1832"} {"premises": "The clara facilitate the sergeant. The clara does not eat the shannan. The clara is fascinated. The clara is supersonic. The clara crosscut the sergeant. The clara remount the sergeant. The clara remount the shannan. The sergeant facilitate the clara. The sergeant facilitate the shannan. The sergeant crosscut the clara. The sergeant remount the shannan. The shannan facilitate the sergeant. The shannan is supersonic. The shannan crosscut the clara. The shannan crosscut the sergeant. If something facilitate the shannan and it crosscut the shannan then it does not see the shannan. If something facilitate the sergeant then it remount the clara. If something remount the clara then it is not grizzled. The clara does not eat the shannan.", "logic": "\nFacilitate(clara, sergeant)\nnot Facilitate(clara, shannan)\nFascinated(clara)\nSupersonic(clara)\nCrosscut(clara, sergeant)\nRemount(clara, sergeant)\nRemount(clara, shannan)\nFacilitate(sergeant, clara)\nFacilitate(sergeant, shannan)\nCrosscut(sergeant, clara)\nRemount(sergeant, shannan)\nFacilitate(shannan, sergeant)\nSupersonic(shannan)\nCrosscut(shannan, clara)\nCrosscut(shannan, sergeant)\nforall x (Facilitate(x, shannan) and Crosscut(x, shannan) -> not Remount(x, shannan))\nforall x (Facilitate(x, sergeant) -> Remount(x, clara))\nforall x (Remount(x, clara) -> not Grizzled(x))\n\nnot Facilitate(clara, shannan)\n\ntherefore not Facilitate(clara, shannan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The florie slum the karlotta. The florie does not eat the korry. The florie is boytrose. The florie is supplicant. The florie jabber the karlotta. The florie thwack the karlotta. The florie thwack the korry. The karlotta slum the florie. The karlotta slum the korry. The karlotta jabber the florie. The karlotta thwack the korry. The korry slum the karlotta. The korry is supplicant. The korry jabber the florie. The korry jabber the karlotta. If something slum the korry and it jabber the korry then it does not see the korry. If something slum the karlotta then it thwack the florie. If something thwack the florie then it is not manned. The korry does not like the florie.", "logic": "\nSlum(florie, karlotta)\nnot Slum(florie, korry)\nBoytrose(florie)\nSupplicant(florie)\nJabber(florie, karlotta)\nThwack(florie, karlotta)\nThwack(florie, korry)\nSlum(karlotta, florie)\nSlum(karlotta, korry)\nJabber(karlotta, florie)\nThwack(karlotta, korry)\nSlum(korry, karlotta)\nSupplicant(korry)\nJabber(korry, florie)\nJabber(korry, karlotta)\nforall x (Slum(x, korry) and Jabber(x, korry) -> not Thwack(x, korry))\nforall x (Slum(x, karlotta) -> Thwack(x, florie))\nforall x (Thwack(x, florie) -> not Manned(x))\n\nnot Jabber(korry, florie)\n\ntherefore Jabber(korry, florie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The caresa moonlight the sylvester. The caresa does not eat the erina. The caresa is saucy. The caresa is flabby. The caresa burgle the sylvester. The caresa underscore the sylvester. The caresa underscore the erina. The sylvester moonlight the caresa. The sylvester moonlight the erina. The sylvester burgle the caresa. The sylvester underscore the erina. The erina moonlight the sylvester. The erina is flabby. The erina burgle the caresa. The erina burgle the sylvester. If something moonlight the erina and it burgle the erina then it does not see the erina. If something moonlight the sylvester then it underscore the caresa. If something underscore the caresa then it is not bellyless. The caresa underscore the caresa.", "logic": "\nMoonlight(caresa, sylvester)\nnot Moonlight(caresa, erina)\nSaucy(caresa)\nFlabby(caresa)\nBurgle(caresa, sylvester)\nUnderscore(caresa, sylvester)\nUnderscore(caresa, erina)\nMoonlight(sylvester, caresa)\nMoonlight(sylvester, erina)\nBurgle(sylvester, caresa)\nUnderscore(sylvester, erina)\nMoonlight(erina, sylvester)\nFlabby(erina)\nBurgle(erina, caresa)\nBurgle(erina, sylvester)\nforall x (Moonlight(x, erina) and Burgle(x, erina) -> not Underscore(x, erina))\nforall x (Moonlight(x, sylvester) -> Underscore(x, caresa))\nforall x (Underscore(x, caresa) -> not Bellyless(x))\n\nUnderscore(caresa, caresa)\n\nMoonlight(caresa, sylvester) and forall x (Moonlight(x, sylvester) -> Underscore(x, caresa)) -> therefore Underscore(caresa, caresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The lin undergird the stefania. The lin does not eat the mateo. The lin is monoploid. The lin is reflected. The lin canvas the stefania. The lin sensitise the stefania. The lin sensitise the mateo. The stefania undergird the lin. The stefania undergird the mateo. The stefania canvas the lin. The stefania sensitise the mateo. The mateo undergird the stefania. The mateo is reflected. The mateo canvas the lin. The mateo canvas the stefania. If something undergird the mateo and it canvas the mateo then it does not see the mateo. If something undergird the stefania then it sensitise the lin. If something sensitise the lin then it is not compound. The lin does not see the lin.", "logic": "\nUndergird(lin, stefania)\nnot Undergird(lin, mateo)\nMonoploid(lin)\nReflected(lin)\nCanvas(lin, stefania)\nSensitise(lin, stefania)\nSensitise(lin, mateo)\nUndergird(stefania, lin)\nUndergird(stefania, mateo)\nCanvas(stefania, lin)\nSensitise(stefania, mateo)\nUndergird(mateo, stefania)\nReflected(mateo)\nCanvas(mateo, lin)\nCanvas(mateo, stefania)\nforall x (Undergird(x, mateo) and Canvas(x, mateo) -> not Sensitise(x, mateo))\nforall x (Undergird(x, stefania) -> Sensitise(x, lin))\nforall x (Sensitise(x, lin) -> not Compound(x))\n\nnot Sensitise(lin, lin)\n\nUndergird(lin, stefania) and forall x (Undergird(x, stefania) -> Sensitise(x, lin)) -> therefore Sensitise(lin, lin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The farrah protract the manuel. The farrah does not eat the sara. The farrah is drowsy. The farrah is fixed. The farrah laze the manuel. The farrah braid the manuel. The farrah braid the sara. The manuel protract the farrah. The manuel protract the sara. The manuel laze the farrah. The manuel braid the sara. The sara protract the manuel. The sara is fixed. The sara laze the farrah. The sara laze the manuel. If something protract the sara and it laze the sara then it does not see the sara. If something protract the manuel then it braid the farrah. If something braid the farrah then it is not falsetto. The farrah is not falsetto.", "logic": "\nProtract(farrah, manuel)\nnot Protract(farrah, sara)\nDrowsy(farrah)\nFixed(farrah)\nLaze(farrah, manuel)\nBraid(farrah, manuel)\nBraid(farrah, sara)\nProtract(manuel, farrah)\nProtract(manuel, sara)\nLaze(manuel, farrah)\nBraid(manuel, sara)\nProtract(sara, manuel)\nFixed(sara)\nLaze(sara, farrah)\nLaze(sara, manuel)\nforall x (Protract(x, sara) and Laze(x, sara) -> not Braid(x, sara))\nforall x (Protract(x, manuel) -> Braid(x, farrah))\nforall x (Braid(x, farrah) -> not Falsetto(x))\n\nnot Falsetto(farrah)\n\nProtract(farrah, manuel) and forall x (Protract(x, manuel) -> Braid(x, farrah)) -> therefore Braid(farrah, farrah) Braid(farrah, farrah) and forall x (Braid(x, farrah) -> not Falsetto(x)) -> therefore not Falsetto(farrah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The gilberta supple the marty. The gilberta does not eat the hildy. The gilberta is emollient. The gilberta is saturnine. The gilberta savor the marty. The gilberta mistreat the marty. The gilberta mistreat the hildy. The marty supple the gilberta. The marty supple the hildy. The marty savor the gilberta. The marty mistreat the hildy. The hildy supple the marty. The hildy is saturnine. The hildy savor the gilberta. The hildy savor the marty. If something supple the hildy and it savor the hildy then it does not see the hildy. If something supple the marty then it mistreat the gilberta. If something mistreat the gilberta then it is not leglike. The gilberta is leglike.", "logic": "\nSupple(gilberta, marty)\nnot Supple(gilberta, hildy)\nEmollient(gilberta)\nSaturnine(gilberta)\nSavor(gilberta, marty)\nMistreat(gilberta, marty)\nMistreat(gilberta, hildy)\nSupple(marty, gilberta)\nSupple(marty, hildy)\nSavor(marty, gilberta)\nMistreat(marty, hildy)\nSupple(hildy, marty)\nSaturnine(hildy)\nSavor(hildy, gilberta)\nSavor(hildy, marty)\nforall x (Supple(x, hildy) and Savor(x, hildy) -> not Mistreat(x, hildy))\nforall x (Supple(x, marty) -> Mistreat(x, gilberta))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, gilberta) -> not Leglike(x))\n\nLeglike(gilberta)\n\nSupple(gilberta, marty) and forall x (Supple(x, marty) -> Mistreat(x, gilberta)) -> therefore Mistreat(gilberta, gilberta) Mistreat(gilberta, gilberta) and forall x (Mistreat(x, gilberta) -> not Leglike(x)) -> therefore not Leglike(gilberta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The wyndham deflower the jessica. The wyndham does not eat the stefan. The wyndham is synonymous. The wyndham is adored. The wyndham dibble the jessica. The wyndham saltate the jessica. The wyndham saltate the stefan. The jessica deflower the wyndham. The jessica deflower the stefan. The jessica dibble the wyndham. The jessica saltate the stefan. The stefan deflower the jessica. The stefan is adored. The stefan dibble the wyndham. The stefan dibble the jessica. If something deflower the stefan and it dibble the stefan then it does not see the stefan. If something deflower the jessica then it saltate the wyndham. If something saltate the wyndham then it is not piercing. The jessica does not see the wyndham.", "logic": "\nDeflower(wyndham, jessica)\nnot Deflower(wyndham, stefan)\nSynonymous(wyndham)\nAdored(wyndham)\nDibble(wyndham, jessica)\nSaltate(wyndham, jessica)\nSaltate(wyndham, stefan)\nDeflower(jessica, wyndham)\nDeflower(jessica, stefan)\nDibble(jessica, wyndham)\nSaltate(jessica, stefan)\nDeflower(stefan, jessica)\nAdored(stefan)\nDibble(stefan, wyndham)\nDibble(stefan, jessica)\nforall x (Deflower(x, stefan) and Dibble(x, stefan) -> not Saltate(x, stefan))\nforall x (Deflower(x, jessica) -> Saltate(x, wyndham))\nforall x (Saltate(x, wyndham) -> not Piercing(x))\n\nnot Saltate(jessica, wyndham)\n\nforall x (Deflower(x, jessica) -> Saltate(x, wyndham)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The meredeth crib the micheal. The meredeth does not eat the kermit. The meredeth is olympian. The meredeth is steepish. The meredeth palatalise the micheal. The meredeth coast the micheal. The meredeth coast the kermit. The micheal crib the meredeth. The micheal crib the kermit. The micheal palatalise the meredeth. The micheal coast the kermit. The kermit crib the micheal. The kermit is steepish. The kermit palatalise the meredeth. The kermit palatalise the micheal. If something crib the kermit and it palatalise the kermit then it does not see the kermit. If something crib the micheal then it coast the meredeth. If something coast the meredeth then it is not articulate. The meredeth is green.", "logic": "\nCrib(meredeth, micheal)\nnot Crib(meredeth, kermit)\nOlympian(meredeth)\nSteepish(meredeth)\nPalatalise(meredeth, micheal)\nCoast(meredeth, micheal)\nCoast(meredeth, kermit)\nCrib(micheal, meredeth)\nCrib(micheal, kermit)\nPalatalise(micheal, meredeth)\nCoast(micheal, kermit)\nCrib(kermit, micheal)\nSteepish(kermit)\nPalatalise(kermit, meredeth)\nPalatalise(kermit, micheal)\nforall x (Crib(x, kermit) and Palatalise(x, kermit) -> not Coast(x, kermit))\nforall x (Crib(x, micheal) -> Coast(x, meredeth))\nforall x (Coast(x, meredeth) -> not Articulate(x))\n\nGreen(meredeth)\n\nGreen(meredeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The dario forsake the ethelda. The dario does not eat the anthony. The dario is askant. The dario is punishing. The dario police the ethelda. The dario clutter the ethelda. The dario clutter the anthony. The ethelda forsake the dario. The ethelda forsake the anthony. The ethelda police the dario. The ethelda clutter the anthony. The anthony forsake the ethelda. The anthony is punishing. The anthony police the dario. The anthony police the ethelda. If something forsake the anthony and it police the anthony then it does not see the anthony. If something forsake the ethelda then it clutter the dario. If something clutter the dario then it is not sapid. The anthony does not eat the dario.", "logic": "\nForsake(dario, ethelda)\nnot Forsake(dario, anthony)\nAskant(dario)\nPunishing(dario)\nPolice(dario, ethelda)\nClutter(dario, ethelda)\nClutter(dario, anthony)\nForsake(ethelda, dario)\nForsake(ethelda, anthony)\nPolice(ethelda, dario)\nClutter(ethelda, anthony)\nForsake(anthony, ethelda)\nPunishing(anthony)\nPolice(anthony, dario)\nPolice(anthony, ethelda)\nforall x (Forsake(x, anthony) and Police(x, anthony) -> not Clutter(x, anthony))\nforall x (Forsake(x, ethelda) -> Clutter(x, dario))\nforall x (Clutter(x, dario) -> not Sapid(x))\n\nnot Forsake(anthony, dario)\n\nnot Forsake(anthony, dario) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The fanny demonise the demetris. The fanny does not eat the trista. The fanny is credited. The fanny is interstate. The fanny palisade the demetris. The fanny larrup the demetris. The fanny larrup the trista. The demetris demonise the fanny. The demetris demonise the trista. The demetris palisade the fanny. The demetris larrup the trista. The trista demonise the demetris. The trista is interstate. The trista palisade the fanny. The trista palisade the demetris. If something demonise the trista and it palisade the trista then it does not see the trista. If something demonise the demetris then it larrup the fanny. If something larrup the fanny then it is not sarcosomal. The demetris is credited.", "logic": "\nDemonise(fanny, demetris)\nnot Demonise(fanny, trista)\nCredited(fanny)\nInterstate(fanny)\nPalisade(fanny, demetris)\nLarrup(fanny, demetris)\nLarrup(fanny, trista)\nDemonise(demetris, fanny)\nDemonise(demetris, trista)\nPalisade(demetris, fanny)\nLarrup(demetris, trista)\nDemonise(trista, demetris)\nInterstate(trista)\nPalisade(trista, fanny)\nPalisade(trista, demetris)\nforall x (Demonise(x, trista) and Palisade(x, trista) -> not Larrup(x, trista))\nforall x (Demonise(x, demetris) -> Larrup(x, fanny))\nforall x (Larrup(x, fanny) -> not Sarcosomal(x))\n\nCredited(demetris)\n\nCredited(demetris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The avrit urge the alameda. The avrit does not eat the elysee. The avrit is motorised. The avrit is unextended. The avrit bruise the alameda. The avrit aviate the alameda. The avrit aviate the elysee. The alameda urge the avrit. The alameda urge the elysee. The alameda bruise the avrit. The alameda aviate the elysee. The elysee urge the alameda. The elysee is unextended. The elysee bruise the avrit. The elysee bruise the alameda. If something urge the elysee and it bruise the elysee then it does not see the elysee. If something urge the alameda then it aviate the avrit. If something aviate the avrit then it is not ungroomed. The alameda does not like the elysee.", "logic": "\nUrge(avrit, alameda)\nnot Urge(avrit, elysee)\nMotorised(avrit)\nUnextended(avrit)\nBruise(avrit, alameda)\nAviate(avrit, alameda)\nAviate(avrit, elysee)\nUrge(alameda, avrit)\nUrge(alameda, elysee)\nBruise(alameda, avrit)\nAviate(alameda, elysee)\nUrge(elysee, alameda)\nUnextended(elysee)\nBruise(elysee, avrit)\nBruise(elysee, alameda)\nforall x (Urge(x, elysee) and Bruise(x, elysee) -> not Aviate(x, elysee))\nforall x (Urge(x, alameda) -> Aviate(x, avrit))\nforall x (Aviate(x, avrit) -> not Ungroomed(x))\n\nnot Bruise(alameda, elysee)\n\nnot Bruise(alameda, elysee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "The roxi vocalize the jessica. The roxi does not eat the johnette. The roxi is disturbed. The roxi is evaporated. The roxi marvel the jessica. The roxi vouchsafe the jessica. The roxi vouchsafe the johnette. The jessica vocalize the roxi. The jessica vocalize the johnette. The jessica marvel the roxi. The jessica vouchsafe the johnette. The johnette vocalize the jessica. The johnette is evaporated. The johnette marvel the roxi. The johnette marvel the jessica. If something vocalize the johnette and it marvel the johnette then it does not see the johnette. If something vocalize the jessica then it vouchsafe the roxi. If something vouchsafe the roxi then it is not grey. The roxi is round.", "logic": "\nVocalize(roxi, jessica)\nnot Vocalize(roxi, johnette)\nDisturbed(roxi)\nEvaporated(roxi)\nMarvel(roxi, jessica)\nVouchsafe(roxi, jessica)\nVouchsafe(roxi, johnette)\nVocalize(jessica, roxi)\nVocalize(jessica, johnette)\nMarvel(jessica, roxi)\nVouchsafe(jessica, johnette)\nVocalize(johnette, jessica)\nEvaporated(johnette)\nMarvel(johnette, roxi)\nMarvel(johnette, jessica)\nforall x (Vocalize(x, johnette) and Marvel(x, johnette) -> not Vouchsafe(x, johnette))\nforall x (Vocalize(x, jessica) -> Vouchsafe(x, roxi))\nforall x (Vouchsafe(x, roxi) -> not Grey(x))\n\nRound(roxi)\n\nRound(roxi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1792"} {"premises": "Halette is isosceles. Stephie is developing. Vikkie is nonionised. If someone is nonionised then they are cormose. Cold people are nonionised. Round people are calamitous. All isosceles, voltaic people are developing. All nonionised people are isosceles. If someone is cormose and nonionised then they are tumid. If someone is voltaic and isosceles then they are tumid. Young people are nonionised. Halette is isosceles.", "logic": "\nIsosceles(halette)\nDeveloping(stephie)\nNonionised(vikkie)\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Cormose(x))\nforall x (Developing(x) -> Nonionised(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) -> Calamitous(x))\nforall x (Isosceles(x) and Voltaic(x) -> Developing(x))\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Isosceles(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) and Nonionised(x) -> Tumid(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) and Isosceles(x) -> Tumid(x))\nforall x (Calamitous(x) -> Nonionised(x))\n\nIsosceles(halette)\n\ntherefore Isosceles(halette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Garcon is kechuan. Alena is deluxe. Hephzibah is content. If someone is content then they are curst. Cold people are content. Round people are matching. All kechuan, cuneal people are deluxe. All content people are kechuan. If someone is curst and content then they are nary. If someone is cuneal and kechuan then they are nary. Young people are content. Hephzibah is not content.", "logic": "\nKechuan(garcon)\nDeluxe(alena)\nContent(hephzibah)\nforall x (Content(x) -> Curst(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) -> Content(x))\nforall x (Curst(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Kechuan(x) and Cuneal(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nforall x (Content(x) -> Kechuan(x))\nforall x (Curst(x) and Content(x) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) and Kechuan(x) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Matching(x) -> Content(x))\n\nnot Content(hephzibah)\n\ntherefore Content(hephzibah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Irvine is thrifty. Elwood is hydroponic. Stanly is astonished. If someone is astonished then they are solar. Cold people are astonished. Round people are decurved. All thrifty, beaten people are hydroponic. All astonished people are thrifty. If someone is solar and astonished then they are viscous. If someone is beaten and thrifty then they are viscous. Young people are astonished. Stanly is thrifty.", "logic": "\nThrifty(irvine)\nHydroponic(elwood)\nAstonished(stanly)\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> Solar(x))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Astonished(x))\nforall x (Solar(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Thrifty(x) and Beaten(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> Thrifty(x))\nforall x (Solar(x) and Astonished(x) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Beaten(x) and Thrifty(x) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Decurved(x) -> Astonished(x))\n\nThrifty(stanly)\n\nAstonished(stanly) and forall x (Astonished(x) -> Thrifty(x)) -> therefore Thrifty(stanly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Kostas is oxidized. Horatio is calced. Marjy is prohibited. If someone is prohibited then they are indie. Cold people are prohibited. Round people are palmate. All oxidized, returnable people are calced. All prohibited people are oxidized. If someone is indie and prohibited then they are untrusting. If someone is returnable and oxidized then they are untrusting. Young people are prohibited. Marjy is not oxidized.", "logic": "\nOxidized(kostas)\nCalced(horatio)\nProhibited(marjy)\nforall x (Prohibited(x) -> Indie(x))\nforall x (Calced(x) -> Prohibited(x))\nforall x (Indie(x) -> Palmate(x))\nforall x (Oxidized(x) and Returnable(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Prohibited(x) -> Oxidized(x))\nforall x (Indie(x) and Prohibited(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Returnable(x) and Oxidized(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) -> Prohibited(x))\n\nnot Oxidized(marjy)\n\nProhibited(marjy) and forall x (Prohibited(x) -> Oxidized(x)) -> therefore Oxidized(marjy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Marylin is vicarial. Vikkie is hulking. Kate is sunk. If someone is sunk then they are imminent. Cold people are sunk. Round people are coinciding. All vicarial, horrid people are hulking. All sunk people are vicarial. If someone is imminent and sunk then they are nonviolent. If someone is horrid and vicarial then they are nonviolent. Young people are sunk. Kate is coinciding.", "logic": "\nVicarial(marylin)\nHulking(vikkie)\nSunk(kate)\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Imminent(x))\nforall x (Hulking(x) -> Sunk(x))\nforall x (Imminent(x) -> Coinciding(x))\nforall x (Vicarial(x) and Horrid(x) -> Hulking(x))\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Vicarial(x))\nforall x (Imminent(x) and Sunk(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) and Vicarial(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\nforall x (Coinciding(x) -> Sunk(x))\n\nCoinciding(kate)\n\nSunk(kate) and forall x (Sunk(x) -> Imminent(x)) -> therefore Imminent(kate) Imminent(kate) and forall x (Imminent(x) -> Coinciding(x)) -> therefore Coinciding(kate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Marika is dopey. Genia is pyrogallic. Teri is trusted. If someone is trusted then they are broadleaf. Cold people are trusted. Round people are biramous. All dopey, unenforced people are pyrogallic. All trusted people are dopey. If someone is broadleaf and trusted then they are buoyant. If someone is unenforced and dopey then they are buoyant. Young people are trusted. Genia is not dopey.", "logic": "\nDopey(marika)\nPyrogallic(genia)\nTrusted(teri)\nforall x (Trusted(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Broadleaf(x) -> Biramous(x))\nforall x (Dopey(x) and Unenforced(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Trusted(x) -> Dopey(x))\nforall x (Broadleaf(x) and Trusted(x) -> Buoyant(x))\nforall x (Unenforced(x) and Dopey(x) -> Buoyant(x))\nforall x (Biramous(x) -> Trusted(x))\n\nnot Dopey(genia)\n\nPyrogallic(genia) and forall x (Pyrogallic(x) -> Trusted(x)) -> therefore Trusted(genia) Trusted(genia) and forall x (Trusted(x) -> Dopey(x)) -> therefore Dopey(genia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Tully is versatile. Gray is allocable. Liorah is powerful. If someone is powerful then they are older. Cold people are powerful. Round people are estonian. All versatile, testate people are allocable. All powerful people are versatile. If someone is older and powerful then they are foetal. If someone is testate and versatile then they are foetal. Young people are powerful. Tully is not foetal.", "logic": "\nVersatile(tully)\nAllocable(gray)\nPowerful(liorah)\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> Older(x))\nforall x (Allocable(x) -> Powerful(x))\nforall x (Older(x) -> Estonian(x))\nforall x (Versatile(x) and Testate(x) -> Allocable(x))\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> Versatile(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and Powerful(x) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Testate(x) and Versatile(x) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Estonian(x) -> Powerful(x))\n\nnot Foetal(tully)\n\nforall x (Older(x) and Powerful(x) -> Foetal(x)) <- forall x (Powerful(x) -> Older(x)) <- forall x (Allocable(x) -> Powerful(x)) <- forall x (Versatile(x) and Testate(x) -> Allocable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Hendrik is iliac. Stillman is roughened. Mendel is converse. If someone is converse then they are baleful. Cold people are converse. Round people are millenary. All iliac, traceable people are roughened. All converse people are iliac. If someone is baleful and converse then they are immutable. If someone is traceable and iliac then they are immutable. Young people are converse. Mendel is roughened.", "logic": "\nIliac(hendrik)\nRoughened(stillman)\nConverse(mendel)\nforall x (Converse(x) -> Baleful(x))\nforall x (Roughened(x) -> Converse(x))\nforall x (Baleful(x) -> Millenary(x))\nforall x (Iliac(x) and Traceable(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) -> Iliac(x))\nforall x (Baleful(x) and Converse(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Traceable(x) and Iliac(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Millenary(x) -> Converse(x))\n\nRoughened(mendel)\n\nforall x (Iliac(x) and Traceable(x) -> Roughened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Sibel is unthankful. Sibylla is slippery. Jewell is nomadic. If someone is nomadic then they are delectable. Cold people are nomadic. Round people are revelatory. All unthankful, metastatic people are slippery. All nomadic people are unthankful. If someone is delectable and nomadic then they are irascible. If someone is metastatic and unthankful then they are irascible. Young people are nomadic. Sibel is not delectable.", "logic": "\nUnthankful(sibel)\nSlippery(sibylla)\nNomadic(jewell)\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Delectable(x))\nforall x (Slippery(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nforall x (Delectable(x) -> Revelatory(x))\nforall x (Unthankful(x) and Metastatic(x) -> Slippery(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Delectable(x) and Nomadic(x) -> Irascible(x))\nforall x (Metastatic(x) and Unthankful(x) -> Irascible(x))\nforall x (Revelatory(x) -> Nomadic(x))\n\nnot Delectable(sibel)\n\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Delectable(x)) <- forall x (Slippery(x) -> Nomadic(x)) <- forall x (Unthankful(x) and Metastatic(x) -> Slippery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Meir is bilateral. Thorstein is fleshy. Wood is perforate. If someone is perforate then they are elongated. Cold people are perforate. Round people are chichi. All bilateral, quondam people are fleshy. All perforate people are bilateral. If someone is elongated and perforate then they are outdoorsy. If someone is quondam and bilateral then they are outdoorsy. Young people are perforate. Wood is quondam.", "logic": "\nBilateral(meir)\nFleshy(thorstein)\nPerforate(wood)\nforall x (Perforate(x) -> Elongated(x))\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Perforate(x))\nforall x (Elongated(x) -> Chichi(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Quondam(x) -> Fleshy(x))\nforall x (Perforate(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Elongated(x) and Perforate(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Bilateral(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Chichi(x) -> Perforate(x))\n\nQuondam(wood)\n\nQuondam(wood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Nyssa is stylized. Myra is twinkly. Marlin is eager. If someone is eager then they are split. Cold people are eager. Round people are placable. All stylized, mellow people are twinkly. All eager people are stylized. If someone is split and eager then they are vibrionic. If someone is mellow and stylized then they are vibrionic. Young people are eager. Myra is not mellow.", "logic": "\nStylized(nyssa)\nTwinkly(myra)\nEager(marlin)\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Split(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Eager(x))\nforall x (Split(x) -> Placable(x))\nforall x (Stylized(x) and Mellow(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Stylized(x))\nforall x (Split(x) and Eager(x) -> Vibrionic(x))\nforall x (Mellow(x) and Stylized(x) -> Vibrionic(x))\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Eager(x))\n\nnot Mellow(myra)\n\nnot Mellow(myra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "Albert is depressing. Dusty is pyaemic. Freemon is grave. If someone is grave then they are visual. Cold people are grave. Round people are amygdaline. All depressing, shielded people are pyaemic. All grave people are depressing. If someone is visual and grave then they are adactylous. If someone is shielded and depressing then they are adactylous. Young people are grave. Albert is shielded.", "logic": "\nDepressing(albert)\nPyaemic(dusty)\nGrave(freemon)\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Visual(x))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Grave(x))\nforall x (Visual(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\nforall x (Depressing(x) and Shielded(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Depressing(x))\nforall x (Visual(x) and Grave(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Shielded(x) and Depressing(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Amygdaline(x) -> Grave(x))\n\nShielded(albert)\n\nShielded(albert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1070"} {"premises": "The englebart concentre the laurens. The laurens frog the englebart. If something concentre the laurens then it waffle the englebart. If something concentre the englebart and the englebart frog the laurens then the laurens concentre the englebart. If something waffle the englebart then it concentre the laurens. If something is clawed then it waffle the englebart. If something frog the laurens then the laurens concentre the englebart. If something concentre the englebart then the englebart frog the laurens. If something frog the laurens and it is through then it waffle the laurens. If something waffle the englebart then the englebart frog the laurens. The laurens frog the englebart.", "logic": "\nConcentre(englebart, laurens)\nFrog(laurens, englebart)\nforall x (Concentre(x, laurens) -> Waffle(x, englebart))\nforall x (Concentre(x, englebart) and Frog(englebart, laurens) -> Concentre(laurens, englebart))\nforall x (Waffle(x, englebart) -> Concentre(x, laurens))\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Waffle(x, englebart))\nforall x (Frog(x, laurens) -> Concentre(laurens, englebart))\nforall x (Concentre(x, englebart) -> Frog(englebart, laurens))\nforall x (Frog(x, laurens) and Through(x) -> Waffle(x, laurens))\nforall x (Waffle(x, englebart) -> Frog(englebart, laurens))\n\nFrog(laurens, englebart)\n\ntherefore Frog(laurens, englebart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The anica forewarn the gerrit. The gerrit cauterise the anica. If something forewarn the gerrit then it acclimate the anica. If something forewarn the anica and the anica cauterise the gerrit then the gerrit forewarn the anica. If something acclimate the anica then it forewarn the gerrit. If something is undynamic then it acclimate the anica. If something cauterise the gerrit then the gerrit forewarn the anica. If something forewarn the anica then the anica cauterise the gerrit. If something cauterise the gerrit and it is lifesize then it acclimate the gerrit. If something acclimate the anica then the anica cauterise the gerrit. The gerrit does not need the anica.", "logic": "\nForewarn(anica, gerrit)\nCauterise(gerrit, anica)\nforall x (Forewarn(x, gerrit) -> Acclimate(x, anica))\nforall x (Forewarn(x, anica) and Cauterise(anica, gerrit) -> Forewarn(gerrit, anica))\nforall x (Acclimate(x, anica) -> Forewarn(x, gerrit))\nforall x (Undynamic(x) -> Acclimate(x, anica))\nforall x (Cauterise(x, gerrit) -> Forewarn(gerrit, anica))\nforall x (Forewarn(x, anica) -> Cauterise(anica, gerrit))\nforall x (Cauterise(x, gerrit) and Lifesize(x) -> Acclimate(x, gerrit))\nforall x (Acclimate(x, anica) -> Cauterise(anica, gerrit))\n\nnot Cauterise(gerrit, anica)\n\ntherefore Cauterise(gerrit, anica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The markus rescale the oralia. The oralia hare the markus. If something rescale the oralia then it syllabize the markus. If something rescale the markus and the markus hare the oralia then the oralia rescale the markus. If something syllabize the markus then it rescale the oralia. If something is pedestrian then it syllabize the markus. If something hare the oralia then the oralia rescale the markus. If something rescale the markus then the markus hare the oralia. If something hare the oralia and it is feigned then it syllabize the oralia. If something syllabize the markus then the markus hare the oralia. The markus syllabize the markus.", "logic": "\nRescale(markus, oralia)\nHare(oralia, markus)\nforall x (Rescale(x, oralia) -> Syllabize(x, markus))\nforall x (Rescale(x, markus) and Hare(markus, oralia) -> Rescale(oralia, markus))\nforall x (Syllabize(x, markus) -> Rescale(x, oralia))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> Syllabize(x, markus))\nforall x (Hare(x, oralia) -> Rescale(oralia, markus))\nforall x (Rescale(x, markus) -> Hare(markus, oralia))\nforall x (Hare(x, oralia) and Feigned(x) -> Syllabize(x, oralia))\nforall x (Syllabize(x, markus) -> Hare(markus, oralia))\n\nSyllabize(markus, markus)\n\nRescale(markus, oralia) and forall x (Rescale(x, oralia) -> Syllabize(x, markus)) -> therefore Syllabize(markus, markus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The janenna nock the angie. The angie misspeak the janenna. If something nock the angie then it approve the janenna. If something nock the janenna and the janenna misspeak the angie then the angie nock the janenna. If something approve the janenna then it nock the angie. If something is handleless then it approve the janenna. If something misspeak the angie then the angie nock the janenna. If something nock the janenna then the janenna misspeak the angie. If something misspeak the angie and it is lxiv then it approve the angie. If something approve the janenna then the janenna misspeak the angie. The janenna does not see the janenna.", "logic": "\nNock(janenna, angie)\nMisspeak(angie, janenna)\nforall x (Nock(x, angie) -> Approve(x, janenna))\nforall x (Nock(x, janenna) and Misspeak(janenna, angie) -> Nock(angie, janenna))\nforall x (Approve(x, janenna) -> Nock(x, angie))\nforall x (Handleless(x) -> Approve(x, janenna))\nforall x (Misspeak(x, angie) -> Nock(angie, janenna))\nforall x (Nock(x, janenna) -> Misspeak(janenna, angie))\nforall x (Misspeak(x, angie) and Lxiv(x) -> Approve(x, angie))\nforall x (Approve(x, janenna) -> Misspeak(janenna, angie))\n\nnot Approve(janenna, janenna)\n\nNock(janenna, angie) and forall x (Nock(x, angie) -> Approve(x, janenna)) -> therefore Approve(janenna, janenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The robinett disunify the nettie. The nettie theme the robinett. If something disunify the nettie then it vocalise the robinett. If something disunify the robinett and the robinett theme the nettie then the nettie disunify the robinett. If something vocalise the robinett then it disunify the nettie. If something is speedy then it vocalise the robinett. If something theme the nettie then the nettie disunify the robinett. If something disunify the robinett then the robinett theme the nettie. If something theme the nettie and it is weeklong then it vocalise the nettie. If something vocalise the robinett then the robinett theme the nettie. The robinett theme the nettie.", "logic": "\nDisunify(robinett, nettie)\nTheme(nettie, robinett)\nforall x (Disunify(x, nettie) -> Vocalise(x, robinett))\nforall x (Disunify(x, robinett) and Theme(robinett, nettie) -> Disunify(nettie, robinett))\nforall x (Vocalise(x, robinett) -> Disunify(x, nettie))\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Vocalise(x, robinett))\nforall x (Theme(x, nettie) -> Disunify(nettie, robinett))\nforall x (Disunify(x, robinett) -> Theme(robinett, nettie))\nforall x (Theme(x, nettie) and Weeklong(x) -> Vocalise(x, nettie))\nforall x (Vocalise(x, robinett) -> Theme(robinett, nettie))\n\nTheme(robinett, nettie)\n\nDisunify(robinett, nettie) and forall x (Disunify(x, nettie) -> Vocalise(x, robinett)) -> therefore Vocalise(robinett, robinett) Vocalise(robinett, robinett) and forall x (Vocalise(x, robinett) -> Theme(robinett, nettie)) -> therefore Theme(robinett, nettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The cosetta airbrush the eba. The eba brook the cosetta. If something airbrush the eba then it heist the cosetta. If something airbrush the cosetta and the cosetta brook the eba then the eba airbrush the cosetta. If something heist the cosetta then it airbrush the eba. If something is linguistic then it heist the cosetta. If something brook the eba then the eba airbrush the cosetta. If something airbrush the cosetta then the cosetta brook the eba. If something brook the eba and it is like then it heist the eba. If something heist the cosetta then the cosetta brook the eba. The cosetta does not need the eba.", "logic": "\nAirbrush(cosetta, eba)\nBrook(eba, cosetta)\nforall x (Airbrush(x, eba) -> Heist(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, cosetta) and Brook(cosetta, eba) -> Airbrush(eba, cosetta))\nforall x (Heist(x, cosetta) -> Airbrush(x, eba))\nforall x (Linguistic(x) -> Heist(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Brook(x, eba) -> Airbrush(eba, cosetta))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, cosetta) -> Brook(cosetta, eba))\nforall x (Brook(x, eba) and Like(x) -> Heist(x, eba))\nforall x (Heist(x, cosetta) -> Brook(cosetta, eba))\n\nnot Brook(cosetta, eba)\n\nAirbrush(cosetta, eba) and forall x (Airbrush(x, eba) -> Heist(x, cosetta)) -> therefore Heist(cosetta, cosetta) Heist(cosetta, cosetta) and forall x (Heist(x, cosetta) -> Brook(cosetta, eba)) -> therefore Brook(cosetta, eba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The bernd revitalize the genevieve. The genevieve shew the bernd. If something revitalize the genevieve then it scavenge the bernd. If something revitalize the bernd and the bernd shew the genevieve then the genevieve revitalize the bernd. If something scavenge the bernd then it revitalize the genevieve. If something is vivacious then it scavenge the bernd. If something shew the genevieve then the genevieve revitalize the bernd. If something revitalize the bernd then the bernd shew the genevieve. If something shew the genevieve and it is unvaned then it scavenge the genevieve. If something scavenge the bernd then the bernd shew the genevieve. The genevieve does not see the bernd.", "logic": "\nRevitalize(bernd, genevieve)\nShew(genevieve, bernd)\nforall x (Revitalize(x, genevieve) -> Scavenge(x, bernd))\nforall x (Revitalize(x, bernd) and Shew(bernd, genevieve) -> Revitalize(genevieve, bernd))\nforall x (Scavenge(x, bernd) -> Revitalize(x, genevieve))\nforall x (Vivacious(x) -> Scavenge(x, bernd))\nforall x (Shew(x, genevieve) -> Revitalize(genevieve, bernd))\nforall x (Revitalize(x, bernd) -> Shew(bernd, genevieve))\nforall x (Shew(x, genevieve) and Unvaned(x) -> Scavenge(x, genevieve))\nforall x (Scavenge(x, bernd) -> Shew(bernd, genevieve))\n\nnot Scavenge(genevieve, bernd)\n\nforall x (Revitalize(x, genevieve) -> Scavenge(x, bernd)) <- forall x (Scavenge(x, bernd) -> Revitalize(x, genevieve)) <- forall x (Vivacious(x) -> Scavenge(x, bernd)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The ham rove the bert. The bert confess the ham. If something rove the bert then it ascribe the ham. If something rove the ham and the ham confess the bert then the bert rove the ham. If something ascribe the ham then it rove the bert. If something is flagitious then it ascribe the ham. If something confess the bert then the bert rove the ham. If something rove the ham then the ham confess the bert. If something confess the bert and it is accustomed then it ascribe the bert. If something ascribe the ham then the ham confess the bert. The bert ascribe the bert.", "logic": "\nRove(ham, bert)\nConfess(bert, ham)\nforall x (Rove(x, bert) -> Ascribe(x, ham))\nforall x (Rove(x, ham) and Confess(ham, bert) -> Rove(bert, ham))\nforall x (Ascribe(x, ham) -> Rove(x, bert))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) -> Ascribe(x, ham))\nforall x (Confess(x, bert) -> Rove(bert, ham))\nforall x (Rove(x, ham) -> Confess(ham, bert))\nforall x (Confess(x, bert) and Accustomed(x) -> Ascribe(x, bert))\nforall x (Ascribe(x, ham) -> Confess(ham, bert))\n\nAscribe(bert, bert)\n\nforall x (Confess(x, bert) and Accustomed(x) -> Ascribe(x, bert)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The ambrosius disgust the jerri. The jerri postmark the ambrosius. If something disgust the jerri then it scout the ambrosius. If something disgust the ambrosius and the ambrosius postmark the jerri then the jerri disgust the ambrosius. If something scout the ambrosius then it disgust the jerri. If something is squiggly then it scout the ambrosius. If something postmark the jerri then the jerri disgust the ambrosius. If something disgust the ambrosius then the ambrosius postmark the jerri. If something postmark the jerri and it is affixial then it scout the jerri. If something scout the ambrosius then the ambrosius postmark the jerri. The ambrosius does not see the jerri.", "logic": "\nDisgust(ambrosius, jerri)\nPostmark(jerri, ambrosius)\nforall x (Disgust(x, jerri) -> Scout(x, ambrosius))\nforall x (Disgust(x, ambrosius) and Postmark(ambrosius, jerri) -> Disgust(jerri, ambrosius))\nforall x (Scout(x, ambrosius) -> Disgust(x, jerri))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Scout(x, ambrosius))\nforall x (Postmark(x, jerri) -> Disgust(jerri, ambrosius))\nforall x (Disgust(x, ambrosius) -> Postmark(ambrosius, jerri))\nforall x (Postmark(x, jerri) and Affixial(x) -> Scout(x, jerri))\nforall x (Scout(x, ambrosius) -> Postmark(ambrosius, jerri))\n\nnot Scout(ambrosius, jerri)\n\nforall x (Postmark(x, jerri) and Affixial(x) -> Scout(x, jerri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The genovera lapidate the mendel. The mendel hoodwink the genovera. If something lapidate the mendel then it westernize the genovera. If something lapidate the genovera and the genovera hoodwink the mendel then the mendel lapidate the genovera. If something westernize the genovera then it lapidate the mendel. If something is damaging then it westernize the genovera. If something hoodwink the mendel then the mendel lapidate the genovera. If something lapidate the genovera then the genovera hoodwink the mendel. If something hoodwink the mendel and it is albanian then it westernize the mendel. If something westernize the genovera then the genovera hoodwink the mendel. The genovera is albanian.", "logic": "\nLapidate(genovera, mendel)\nHoodwink(mendel, genovera)\nforall x (Lapidate(x, mendel) -> Westernize(x, genovera))\nforall x (Lapidate(x, genovera) and Hoodwink(genovera, mendel) -> Lapidate(mendel, genovera))\nforall x (Westernize(x, genovera) -> Lapidate(x, mendel))\nforall x (Damaging(x) -> Westernize(x, genovera))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, mendel) -> Lapidate(mendel, genovera))\nforall x (Lapidate(x, genovera) -> Hoodwink(genovera, mendel))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, mendel) and Albanian(x) -> Westernize(x, mendel))\nforall x (Westernize(x, genovera) -> Hoodwink(genovera, mendel))\n\nAlbanian(genovera)\n\nAlbanian(genovera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The ernesta predispose the candy. The candy eventuate the ernesta. If something predispose the candy then it detour the ernesta. If something predispose the ernesta and the ernesta eventuate the candy then the candy predispose the ernesta. If something detour the ernesta then it predispose the candy. If something is binuclear then it detour the ernesta. If something eventuate the candy then the candy predispose the ernesta. If something predispose the ernesta then the ernesta eventuate the candy. If something eventuate the candy and it is skint then it detour the candy. If something detour the ernesta then the ernesta eventuate the candy. The candy is not skint.", "logic": "\nPredispose(ernesta, candy)\nEventuate(candy, ernesta)\nforall x (Predispose(x, candy) -> Detour(x, ernesta))\nforall x (Predispose(x, ernesta) and Eventuate(ernesta, candy) -> Predispose(candy, ernesta))\nforall x (Detour(x, ernesta) -> Predispose(x, candy))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) -> Detour(x, ernesta))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, candy) -> Predispose(candy, ernesta))\nforall x (Predispose(x, ernesta) -> Eventuate(ernesta, candy))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, candy) and Skint(x) -> Detour(x, candy))\nforall x (Detour(x, ernesta) -> Eventuate(ernesta, candy))\n\nnot Skint(candy)\n\nnot Skint(candy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The solange befoul the dawn. The dawn throb the solange. If something befoul the dawn then it cloud the solange. If something befoul the solange and the solange throb the dawn then the dawn befoul the solange. If something cloud the solange then it befoul the dawn. If something is gimcrack then it cloud the solange. If something throb the dawn then the dawn befoul the solange. If something befoul the solange then the solange throb the dawn. If something throb the dawn and it is citywide then it cloud the dawn. If something cloud the solange then the solange throb the dawn. The solange befoul the solange.", "logic": "\nBefoul(solange, dawn)\nThrob(dawn, solange)\nforall x (Befoul(x, dawn) -> Cloud(x, solange))\nforall x (Befoul(x, solange) and Throb(solange, dawn) -> Befoul(dawn, solange))\nforall x (Cloud(x, solange) -> Befoul(x, dawn))\nforall x (Gimcrack(x) -> Cloud(x, solange))\nforall x (Throb(x, dawn) -> Befoul(dawn, solange))\nforall x (Befoul(x, solange) -> Throb(solange, dawn))\nforall x (Throb(x, dawn) and Citywide(x) -> Cloud(x, dawn))\nforall x (Cloud(x, solange) -> Throb(solange, dawn))\n\nBefoul(solange, solange)\n\nBefoul(solange, solange) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "The avrom is unearned. The avrom skewer the kanya. The sibylla redesign the kanya. The sibylla is fivefold. The sibylla is fortuitous. The sibylla is frosted. The kanya is fivefold. The kanya is frosted. The kanya skewer the davina. The davina is macerative. The davina is frosted. The davina skewer the kanya. If someone redesign the avrom then they are unearned. If someone skewer the sibylla and they are frosted then the sibylla is unearned. If someone redesign the sibylla then the sibylla collocate the davina. If someone skewer the avrom then they are fivefold. If someone collocate the avrom then the avrom collocate the sibylla. If someone redesign the kanya then the kanya redesign the avrom. The sibylla is fortuitous.", "logic": "\nUnearned(avrom)\nSkewer(avrom, kanya)\nRedesign(sibylla, kanya)\nFivefold(sibylla)\nFortuitous(sibylla)\nFrosted(sibylla)\nFivefold(kanya)\nFrosted(kanya)\nSkewer(kanya, davina)\nMacerative(davina)\nFrosted(davina)\nSkewer(davina, kanya)\nforall x (Redesign(x, avrom) -> Unearned(x))\nforall x (Skewer(x, sibylla) and Frosted(x) -> Unearned(sibylla))\nforall x (Redesign(x, sibylla) -> Collocate(sibylla, davina))\nforall x (Skewer(x, avrom) -> Fivefold(x))\nforall x (Collocate(x, avrom) -> Collocate(avrom, sibylla))\nforall x (Redesign(x, kanya) -> Redesign(kanya, avrom))\n\nFortuitous(sibylla)\n\ntherefore Fortuitous(sibylla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The rebeka is oversewn. The rebeka misspend the fernanda. The arliene typecast the fernanda. The arliene is colonised. The arliene is anile. The arliene is semite. The fernanda is colonised. The fernanda is semite. The fernanda misspend the brandise. The brandise is unshaped. The brandise is semite. The brandise misspend the fernanda. If someone typecast the rebeka then they are oversewn. If someone misspend the arliene and they are semite then the arliene is oversewn. If someone typecast the arliene then the arliene blog the brandise. If someone misspend the rebeka then they are colonised. If someone blog the rebeka then the rebeka blog the arliene. If someone typecast the fernanda then the fernanda typecast the rebeka. The arliene is not anile.", "logic": "\nOversewn(rebeka)\nMisspend(rebeka, fernanda)\nTypecast(arliene, fernanda)\nColonised(arliene)\nAnile(arliene)\nSemite(arliene)\nColonised(fernanda)\nSemite(fernanda)\nMisspend(fernanda, brandise)\nUnshaped(brandise)\nSemite(brandise)\nMisspend(brandise, fernanda)\nforall x (Typecast(x, rebeka) -> Oversewn(x))\nforall x (Misspend(x, arliene) and Semite(x) -> Oversewn(arliene))\nforall x (Typecast(x, arliene) -> Blog(arliene, brandise))\nforall x (Misspend(x, rebeka) -> Colonised(x))\nforall x (Blog(x, rebeka) -> Blog(rebeka, arliene))\nforall x (Typecast(x, fernanda) -> Typecast(fernanda, rebeka))\n\nnot Anile(arliene)\n\ntherefore Anile(arliene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The wanda is spectral. The wanda bill the timotheus. The roger tune the timotheus. The roger is pocked. The roger is overnight. The roger is yugoslav. The timotheus is pocked. The timotheus is yugoslav. The timotheus bill the beatrix. The beatrix is abstruse. The beatrix is yugoslav. The beatrix bill the timotheus. If someone tune the wanda then they are spectral. If someone bill the roger and they are yugoslav then the roger is spectral. If someone tune the roger then the roger give the beatrix. If someone bill the wanda then they are pocked. If someone give the wanda then the wanda give the roger. If someone tune the timotheus then the timotheus tune the wanda. The timotheus tune the wanda.", "logic": "\nSpectral(wanda)\nBill(wanda, timotheus)\nTune(roger, timotheus)\nPocked(roger)\nOvernight(roger)\nYugoslav(roger)\nPocked(timotheus)\nYugoslav(timotheus)\nBill(timotheus, beatrix)\nAbstruse(beatrix)\nYugoslav(beatrix)\nBill(beatrix, timotheus)\nforall x (Tune(x, wanda) -> Spectral(x))\nforall x (Bill(x, roger) and Yugoslav(x) -> Spectral(roger))\nforall x (Tune(x, roger) -> Give(roger, beatrix))\nforall x (Bill(x, wanda) -> Pocked(x))\nforall x (Give(x, wanda) -> Give(wanda, roger))\nforall x (Tune(x, timotheus) -> Tune(timotheus, wanda))\n\nTune(timotheus, wanda)\n\nTune(roger, timotheus) and forall x (Tune(x, timotheus) -> Tune(timotheus, wanda)) -> therefore Tune(timotheus, wanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The mavra is ridged. The mavra operate the ahmet. The theodora spin the ahmet. The theodora is getable. The theodora is delightful. The theodora is norwegian. The ahmet is getable. The ahmet is norwegian. The ahmet operate the matthaeus. The matthaeus is mensurable. The matthaeus is norwegian. The matthaeus operate the ahmet. If someone spin the mavra then they are ridged. If someone operate the theodora and they are norwegian then the theodora is ridged. If someone spin the theodora then the theodora conglobate the matthaeus. If someone operate the mavra then they are getable. If someone conglobate the mavra then the mavra conglobate the theodora. If someone spin the ahmet then the ahmet spin the mavra. The ahmet does not chase the mavra.", "logic": "\nRidged(mavra)\nOperate(mavra, ahmet)\nSpin(theodora, ahmet)\nGetable(theodora)\nDelightful(theodora)\nNorwegian(theodora)\nGetable(ahmet)\nNorwegian(ahmet)\nOperate(ahmet, matthaeus)\nMensurable(matthaeus)\nNorwegian(matthaeus)\nOperate(matthaeus, ahmet)\nforall x (Spin(x, mavra) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Operate(x, theodora) and Norwegian(x) -> Ridged(theodora))\nforall x (Spin(x, theodora) -> Conglobate(theodora, matthaeus))\nforall x (Operate(x, mavra) -> Getable(x))\nforall x (Conglobate(x, mavra) -> Conglobate(mavra, theodora))\nforall x (Spin(x, ahmet) -> Spin(ahmet, mavra))\n\nnot Spin(ahmet, mavra)\n\nSpin(theodora, ahmet) and forall x (Spin(x, ahmet) -> Spin(ahmet, mavra)) -> therefore Spin(ahmet, mavra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The ardelis is modal. The ardelis glue the pablo. The joslyn recruit the pablo. The joslyn is puzzling. The joslyn is spanking. The joslyn is current. The pablo is puzzling. The pablo is current. The pablo glue the kyrstin. The kyrstin is alpha. The kyrstin is current. The kyrstin glue the pablo. If someone recruit the ardelis then they are modal. If someone glue the joslyn and they are current then the joslyn is modal. If someone recruit the joslyn then the joslyn regale the kyrstin. If someone glue the ardelis then they are puzzling. If someone regale the ardelis then the ardelis regale the joslyn. If someone recruit the pablo then the pablo recruit the ardelis. The pablo is modal.", "logic": "\nModal(ardelis)\nGlue(ardelis, pablo)\nRecruit(joslyn, pablo)\nPuzzling(joslyn)\nSpanking(joslyn)\nCurrent(joslyn)\nPuzzling(pablo)\nCurrent(pablo)\nGlue(pablo, kyrstin)\nAlpha(kyrstin)\nCurrent(kyrstin)\nGlue(kyrstin, pablo)\nforall x (Recruit(x, ardelis) -> Modal(x))\nforall x (Glue(x, joslyn) and Current(x) -> Modal(joslyn))\nforall x (Recruit(x, joslyn) -> Regale(joslyn, kyrstin))\nforall x (Glue(x, ardelis) -> Puzzling(x))\nforall x (Regale(x, ardelis) -> Regale(ardelis, joslyn))\nforall x (Recruit(x, pablo) -> Recruit(pablo, ardelis))\n\nModal(pablo)\n\nRecruit(joslyn, pablo) and forall x (Recruit(x, pablo) -> Recruit(pablo, ardelis)) -> therefore Recruit(pablo, ardelis) Recruit(pablo, ardelis) and forall x (Recruit(x, ardelis) -> Modal(x)) -> therefore Modal(pablo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The ansley is synonymous. The ansley jerk the ambur. The catriona overtop the ambur. The catriona is jolted. The catriona is neotenous. The catriona is navigable. The ambur is jolted. The ambur is navigable. The ambur jerk the ronnica. The ronnica is washy. The ronnica is navigable. The ronnica jerk the ambur. If someone overtop the ansley then they are synonymous. If someone jerk the catriona and they are navigable then the catriona is synonymous. If someone overtop the catriona then the catriona spurt the ronnica. If someone jerk the ansley then they are jolted. If someone spurt the ansley then the ansley spurt the catriona. If someone overtop the ambur then the ambur overtop the ansley. The ambur is not synonymous.", "logic": "\nSynonymous(ansley)\nJerk(ansley, ambur)\nOvertop(catriona, ambur)\nJolted(catriona)\nNeotenous(catriona)\nNavigable(catriona)\nJolted(ambur)\nNavigable(ambur)\nJerk(ambur, ronnica)\nWashy(ronnica)\nNavigable(ronnica)\nJerk(ronnica, ambur)\nforall x (Overtop(x, ansley) -> Synonymous(x))\nforall x (Jerk(x, catriona) and Navigable(x) -> Synonymous(catriona))\nforall x (Overtop(x, catriona) -> Spurt(catriona, ronnica))\nforall x (Jerk(x, ansley) -> Jolted(x))\nforall x (Spurt(x, ansley) -> Spurt(ansley, catriona))\nforall x (Overtop(x, ambur) -> Overtop(ambur, ansley))\n\nnot Synonymous(ambur)\n\nOvertop(catriona, ambur) and forall x (Overtop(x, ambur) -> Overtop(ambur, ansley)) -> therefore Overtop(ambur, ansley) Overtop(ambur, ansley) and forall x (Overtop(x, ansley) -> Synonymous(x)) -> therefore Synonymous(ambur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The ebonee is numberless. The ebonee stupefy the othella. The margery weather the othella. The margery is imported. The margery is sterilized. The margery is unused. The othella is imported. The othella is unused. The othella stupefy the deeann. The deeann is diadromous. The deeann is unused. The deeann stupefy the othella. If someone weather the ebonee then they are numberless. If someone stupefy the margery and they are unused then the margery is numberless. If someone weather the margery then the margery delete the deeann. If someone stupefy the ebonee then they are imported. If someone delete the ebonee then the ebonee delete the margery. If someone weather the othella then the othella weather the ebonee. The margery does not eat the deeann.", "logic": "\nNumberless(ebonee)\nStupefy(ebonee, othella)\nWeather(margery, othella)\nImported(margery)\nSterilized(margery)\nUnused(margery)\nImported(othella)\nUnused(othella)\nStupefy(othella, deeann)\nDiadromous(deeann)\nUnused(deeann)\nStupefy(deeann, othella)\nforall x (Weather(x, ebonee) -> Numberless(x))\nforall x (Stupefy(x, margery) and Unused(x) -> Numberless(margery))\nforall x (Weather(x, margery) -> Delete(margery, deeann))\nforall x (Stupefy(x, ebonee) -> Imported(x))\nforall x (Delete(x, ebonee) -> Delete(ebonee, margery))\nforall x (Weather(x, othella) -> Weather(othella, ebonee))\n\nnot Delete(margery, deeann)\n\nforall x (Weather(x, margery) -> Delete(margery, deeann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The shantee is unskilled. The shantee garter the ritchie. The coralie embalm the ritchie. The coralie is overlarge. The coralie is unfunny. The coralie is global. The ritchie is overlarge. The ritchie is global. The ritchie garter the bettina. The bettina is unofficial. The bettina is global. The bettina garter the ritchie. If someone embalm the shantee then they are unskilled. If someone garter the coralie and they are global then the coralie is unskilled. If someone embalm the coralie then the coralie flip the bettina. If someone garter the shantee then they are overlarge. If someone flip the shantee then the shantee flip the coralie. If someone embalm the ritchie then the ritchie embalm the shantee. The coralie is unskilled.", "logic": "\nUnskilled(shantee)\nGarter(shantee, ritchie)\nEmbalm(coralie, ritchie)\nOverlarge(coralie)\nUnfunny(coralie)\nGlobal(coralie)\nOverlarge(ritchie)\nGlobal(ritchie)\nGarter(ritchie, bettina)\nUnofficial(bettina)\nGlobal(bettina)\nGarter(bettina, ritchie)\nforall x (Embalm(x, shantee) -> Unskilled(x))\nforall x (Garter(x, coralie) and Global(x) -> Unskilled(coralie))\nforall x (Embalm(x, coralie) -> Flip(coralie, bettina))\nforall x (Garter(x, shantee) -> Overlarge(x))\nforall x (Flip(x, shantee) -> Flip(shantee, coralie))\nforall x (Embalm(x, ritchie) -> Embalm(ritchie, shantee))\n\nUnskilled(coralie)\n\nforall x (Embalm(x, shantee) -> Unskilled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The stu is highborn. The stu ignite the chandra. The dorri reimburse the chandra. The dorri is witty. The dorri is dutiable. The dorri is uncomely. The chandra is witty. The chandra is uncomely. The chandra ignite the ted. The ted is wigged. The ted is uncomely. The ted ignite the chandra. If someone reimburse the stu then they are highborn. If someone ignite the dorri and they are uncomely then the dorri is highborn. If someone reimburse the dorri then the dorri clop the ted. If someone ignite the stu then they are witty. If someone clop the stu then the stu clop the dorri. If someone reimburse the chandra then the chandra reimburse the stu. The stu does not eat the dorri.", "logic": "\nHighborn(stu)\nIgnite(stu, chandra)\nReimburse(dorri, chandra)\nWitty(dorri)\nDutiable(dorri)\nUncomely(dorri)\nWitty(chandra)\nUncomely(chandra)\nIgnite(chandra, ted)\nWigged(ted)\nUncomely(ted)\nIgnite(ted, chandra)\nforall x (Reimburse(x, stu) -> Highborn(x))\nforall x (Ignite(x, dorri) and Uncomely(x) -> Highborn(dorri))\nforall x (Reimburse(x, dorri) -> Clop(dorri, ted))\nforall x (Ignite(x, stu) -> Witty(x))\nforall x (Clop(x, stu) -> Clop(stu, dorri))\nforall x (Reimburse(x, chandra) -> Reimburse(chandra, stu))\n\nnot Clop(stu, dorri)\n\nforall x (Clop(x, stu) -> Clop(stu, dorri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The doria is silvern. The doria dethrone the marietta. The bryan witness the marietta. The bryan is zero. The bryan is operable. The bryan is bivalved. The marietta is zero. The marietta is bivalved. The marietta dethrone the ronda. The ronda is cubital. The ronda is bivalved. The ronda dethrone the marietta. If someone witness the doria then they are silvern. If someone dethrone the bryan and they are bivalved then the bryan is silvern. If someone witness the bryan then the bryan supply the ronda. If someone dethrone the doria then they are zero. If someone supply the doria then the doria supply the bryan. If someone witness the marietta then the marietta witness the doria. The doria dethrone the ronda.", "logic": "\nSilvern(doria)\nDethrone(doria, marietta)\nWitness(bryan, marietta)\nZero(bryan)\nOperable(bryan)\nBivalved(bryan)\nZero(marietta)\nBivalved(marietta)\nDethrone(marietta, ronda)\nCubital(ronda)\nBivalved(ronda)\nDethrone(ronda, marietta)\nforall x (Witness(x, doria) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Dethrone(x, bryan) and Bivalved(x) -> Silvern(bryan))\nforall x (Witness(x, bryan) -> Supply(bryan, ronda))\nforall x (Dethrone(x, doria) -> Zero(x))\nforall x (Supply(x, doria) -> Supply(doria, bryan))\nforall x (Witness(x, marietta) -> Witness(marietta, doria))\n\nDethrone(doria, ronda)\n\nDethrone(doria, ronda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The nathanial is empyreal. The nathanial underline the julienne. The allys span the julienne. The allys is undraped. The allys is expected. The allys is seismal. The julienne is undraped. The julienne is seismal. The julienne underline the ralina. The ralina is configured. The ralina is seismal. The ralina underline the julienne. If someone span the nathanial then they are empyreal. If someone underline the allys and they are seismal then the allys is empyreal. If someone span the allys then the allys breathe the ralina. If someone underline the nathanial then they are undraped. If someone breathe the nathanial then the nathanial breathe the allys. If someone span the julienne then the julienne span the nathanial. The julienne is not expected.", "logic": "\nEmpyreal(nathanial)\nUnderline(nathanial, julienne)\nSpan(allys, julienne)\nUndraped(allys)\nExpected(allys)\nSeismal(allys)\nUndraped(julienne)\nSeismal(julienne)\nUnderline(julienne, ralina)\nConfigured(ralina)\nSeismal(ralina)\nUnderline(ralina, julienne)\nforall x (Span(x, nathanial) -> Empyreal(x))\nforall x (Underline(x, allys) and Seismal(x) -> Empyreal(allys))\nforall x (Span(x, allys) -> Breathe(allys, ralina))\nforall x (Underline(x, nathanial) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Breathe(x, nathanial) -> Breathe(nathanial, allys))\nforall x (Span(x, julienne) -> Span(julienne, nathanial))\n\nnot Expected(julienne)\n\nnot Expected(julienne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "The pammi is bottomed. The pammi prioritize the zuzana. The sansone douse the zuzana. The sansone is indicatory. The sansone is brave. The sansone is unrevealed. The zuzana is indicatory. The zuzana is unrevealed. The zuzana prioritize the suzi. The suzi is imbalanced. The suzi is unrevealed. The suzi prioritize the zuzana. If someone douse the pammi then they are bottomed. If someone prioritize the sansone and they are unrevealed then the sansone is bottomed. If someone douse the sansone then the sansone shrink the suzi. If someone prioritize the pammi then they are indicatory. If someone shrink the pammi then the pammi shrink the sansone. If someone douse the zuzana then the zuzana douse the pammi. The pammi shrink the pammi.", "logic": "\nBottomed(pammi)\nPrioritize(pammi, zuzana)\nDouse(sansone, zuzana)\nIndicatory(sansone)\nBrave(sansone)\nUnrevealed(sansone)\nIndicatory(zuzana)\nUnrevealed(zuzana)\nPrioritize(zuzana, suzi)\nImbalanced(suzi)\nUnrevealed(suzi)\nPrioritize(suzi, zuzana)\nforall x (Douse(x, pammi) -> Bottomed(x))\nforall x (Prioritize(x, sansone) and Unrevealed(x) -> Bottomed(sansone))\nforall x (Douse(x, sansone) -> Shrink(sansone, suzi))\nforall x (Prioritize(x, pammi) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Shrink(x, pammi) -> Shrink(pammi, sansone))\nforall x (Douse(x, zuzana) -> Douse(zuzana, pammi))\n\nShrink(pammi, pammi)\n\nShrink(pammi, pammi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-612"} {"premises": "Janka is nonbearing. Janka is unbloody. Janka is reasoning. Janka is irritable. Mikako is dreary. Mikako is nonbearing. Mikako is socialised. Green people are reasoning. All irritable, reasoning people are unbloody. All unbloody, springless people are irritable. All socialised, nonbearing people are dreary. Blue people are springless. If someone is reasoning and irritable then they are dreary. Mikako is dreary.", "logic": "\nNonbearing(janka)\nUnbloody(janka)\nReasoning(janka)\nIrritable(janka)\nDreary(mikako)\nNonbearing(mikako)\nSocialised(mikako)\nforall x (Unbloody(x) -> Reasoning(x))\nforall x (Irritable(x) and Reasoning(x) -> Unbloody(x))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Springless(x) -> Irritable(x))\nforall x (Socialised(x) and Nonbearing(x) -> Dreary(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) -> Springless(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) and Irritable(x) -> Dreary(x))\n\nDreary(mikako)\n\ntherefore Dreary(mikako)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Willie is blunt. Willie is cutaneous. Willie is lithe. Willie is drooping. Vanni is buddhist. Vanni is blunt. Vanni is moveable. Green people are lithe. All drooping, lithe people are cutaneous. All cutaneous, edifying people are drooping. All moveable, blunt people are buddhist. Blue people are edifying. If someone is lithe and drooping then they are buddhist. Vanni is not blunt.", "logic": "\nBlunt(willie)\nCutaneous(willie)\nLithe(willie)\nDrooping(willie)\nBuddhist(vanni)\nBlunt(vanni)\nMoveable(vanni)\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Lithe(x))\nforall x (Drooping(x) and Lithe(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) and Edifying(x) -> Drooping(x))\nforall x (Moveable(x) and Blunt(x) -> Buddhist(x))\nforall x (Buddhist(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) and Drooping(x) -> Buddhist(x))\n\nnot Blunt(vanni)\n\ntherefore Blunt(vanni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Florie is genial. Florie is unflawed. Florie is innumerous. Florie is reductive. Joab is bladdery. Joab is genial. Joab is extensive. Green people are innumerous. All reductive, innumerous people are unflawed. All unflawed, tympanic people are reductive. All extensive, genial people are bladdery. Blue people are tympanic. If someone is innumerous and reductive then they are bladdery. Florie is bladdery.", "logic": "\nGenial(florie)\nUnflawed(florie)\nInnumerous(florie)\nReductive(florie)\nBladdery(joab)\nGenial(joab)\nExtensive(joab)\nforall x (Unflawed(x) -> Innumerous(x))\nforall x (Reductive(x) and Innumerous(x) -> Unflawed(x))\nforall x (Unflawed(x) and Tympanic(x) -> Reductive(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Genial(x) -> Bladdery(x))\nforall x (Bladdery(x) -> Tympanic(x))\nforall x (Innumerous(x) and Reductive(x) -> Bladdery(x))\n\nBladdery(florie)\n\nInnumerous(florie) and Reductive(florie) and forall x (Innumerous(x) and Reductive(x) -> Bladdery(x)) -> therefore Bladdery(florie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Fowler is spiritual. Fowler is withered. Fowler is tartaric. Fowler is noseless. Pollyanna is deceased. Pollyanna is spiritual. Pollyanna is matey. Green people are tartaric. All noseless, tartaric people are withered. All withered, clarion people are noseless. All matey, spiritual people are deceased. Blue people are clarion. If someone is tartaric and noseless then they are deceased. Fowler is not deceased.", "logic": "\nSpiritual(fowler)\nWithered(fowler)\nTartaric(fowler)\nNoseless(fowler)\nDeceased(pollyanna)\nSpiritual(pollyanna)\nMatey(pollyanna)\nforall x (Withered(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nforall x (Noseless(x) and Tartaric(x) -> Withered(x))\nforall x (Withered(x) and Clarion(x) -> Noseless(x))\nforall x (Matey(x) and Spiritual(x) -> Deceased(x))\nforall x (Deceased(x) -> Clarion(x))\nforall x (Tartaric(x) and Noseless(x) -> Deceased(x))\n\nnot Deceased(fowler)\n\nTartaric(fowler) and Noseless(fowler) and forall x (Tartaric(x) and Noseless(x) -> Deceased(x)) -> therefore Deceased(fowler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Saudra is anthropic. Saudra is inboard. Saudra is polish. Saudra is molded. Adolph is speaking. Adolph is anthropic. Adolph is rutted. Green people are polish. All molded, polish people are inboard. All inboard, jumpy people are molded. All rutted, anthropic people are speaking. Blue people are jumpy. If someone is polish and molded then they are speaking. Saudra is jumpy.", "logic": "\nAnthropic(saudra)\nInboard(saudra)\nPolish(saudra)\nMolded(saudra)\nSpeaking(adolph)\nAnthropic(adolph)\nRutted(adolph)\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Molded(x) and Polish(x) -> Inboard(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) and Jumpy(x) -> Molded(x))\nforall x (Rutted(x) and Anthropic(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) -> Jumpy(x))\nforall x (Polish(x) and Molded(x) -> Speaking(x))\n\nJumpy(saudra)\n\nPolish(saudra) and Molded(saudra) and forall x (Polish(x) and Molded(x) -> Speaking(x)) -> therefore Speaking(saudra) Speaking(saudra) and forall x (Speaking(x) -> Jumpy(x)) -> therefore Jumpy(saudra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Mella is analyzable. Mella is decompound. Mella is buckram. Mella is loyal. Ardelia is echoic. Ardelia is analyzable. Ardelia is abundant. Green people are buckram. All loyal, buckram people are decompound. All decompound, silvan people are loyal. All abundant, analyzable people are echoic. Blue people are silvan. If someone is buckram and loyal then they are echoic. Mella is not silvan.", "logic": "\nAnalyzable(mella)\nDecompound(mella)\nBuckram(mella)\nLoyal(mella)\nEchoic(ardelia)\nAnalyzable(ardelia)\nAbundant(ardelia)\nforall x (Decompound(x) -> Buckram(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) and Buckram(x) -> Decompound(x))\nforall x (Decompound(x) and Silvan(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Abundant(x) and Analyzable(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Buckram(x) and Loyal(x) -> Echoic(x))\n\nnot Silvan(mella)\n\nBuckram(mella) and Loyal(mella) and forall x (Buckram(x) and Loyal(x) -> Echoic(x)) -> therefore Echoic(mella) Echoic(mella) and forall x (Echoic(x) -> Silvan(x)) -> therefore Silvan(mella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Tabor is proto. Tabor is ragged. Tabor is nodding. Tabor is beery. Morganica is botanical. Morganica is proto. Morganica is desegrated. Green people are nodding. All beery, nodding people are ragged. All ragged, untempting people are beery. All desegrated, proto people are botanical. Blue people are untempting. If someone is nodding and beery then they are botanical. Morganica is not beery.", "logic": "\nProto(tabor)\nRagged(tabor)\nNodding(tabor)\nBeery(tabor)\nBotanical(morganica)\nProto(morganica)\nDesegrated(morganica)\nforall x (Ragged(x) -> Nodding(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) and Nodding(x) -> Ragged(x))\nforall x (Ragged(x) and Untempting(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Desegrated(x) and Proto(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) -> Untempting(x))\nforall x (Nodding(x) and Beery(x) -> Botanical(x))\n\nnot Beery(morganica)\n\nforall x (Ragged(x) and Untempting(x) -> Beery(x)) <- forall x (Beery(x) and Nodding(x) -> Ragged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Puff is molal. Puff is amusing. Puff is analytical. Puff is unopen. Zane is forfeited. Zane is molal. Zane is disliked. Green people are analytical. All unopen, analytical people are amusing. All amusing, gradatory people are unopen. All disliked, molal people are forfeited. Blue people are gradatory. If someone is analytical and unopen then they are forfeited. Zane is analytical.", "logic": "\nMolal(puff)\nAmusing(puff)\nAnalytical(puff)\nUnopen(puff)\nForfeited(zane)\nMolal(zane)\nDisliked(zane)\nforall x (Amusing(x) -> Analytical(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) and Analytical(x) -> Amusing(x))\nforall x (Amusing(x) and Gradatory(x) -> Unopen(x))\nforall x (Disliked(x) and Molal(x) -> Forfeited(x))\nforall x (Forfeited(x) -> Gradatory(x))\nforall x (Analytical(x) and Unopen(x) -> Forfeited(x))\n\nAnalytical(zane)\n\nforall x (Amusing(x) -> Analytical(x)) <- forall x (Unopen(x) and Analytical(x) -> Amusing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Corky is ungrasped. Corky is ploughed. Corky is cruciate. Corky is weeping. Napoleon is latino. Napoleon is ungrasped. Napoleon is relative. Green people are cruciate. All weeping, cruciate people are ploughed. All ploughed, aneroid people are weeping. All relative, ungrasped people are latino. Blue people are aneroid. If someone is cruciate and weeping then they are latino. Napoleon is not ploughed.", "logic": "\nUngrasped(corky)\nPloughed(corky)\nCruciate(corky)\nWeeping(corky)\nLatino(napoleon)\nUngrasped(napoleon)\nRelative(napoleon)\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Weeping(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) and Aneroid(x) -> Weeping(x))\nforall x (Relative(x) and Ungrasped(x) -> Latino(x))\nforall x (Latino(x) -> Aneroid(x))\nforall x (Cruciate(x) and Weeping(x) -> Latino(x))\n\nnot Ploughed(napoleon)\n\nforall x (Weeping(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Ploughed(x)) <- forall x (Ploughed(x) and Aneroid(x) -> Weeping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "Dyna is songful. Dyna is workaday. Dyna is tremendous. Dyna is basidial. Gordan is unlettered. Gordan is songful. Gordan is aurous. Green people are tremendous. All basidial, tremendous people are workaday. All workaday, enmeshed people are basidial. All aurous, songful people are unlettered. Blue people are enmeshed. If someone is tremendous and basidial then they are unlettered. Dyna is aurous.", "logic": "\nSongful(dyna)\nWorkaday(dyna)\nTremendous(dyna)\nBasidial(dyna)\nUnlettered(gordan)\nSongful(gordan)\nAurous(gordan)\nforall x (Workaday(x) -> Tremendous(x))\nforall x (Basidial(x) and Tremendous(x) -> Workaday(x))\nforall x (Workaday(x) and Enmeshed(x) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Aurous(x) and Songful(x) -> Unlettered(x))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) -> Enmeshed(x))\nforall x (Tremendous(x) and Basidial(x) -> Unlettered(x))\n\nAurous(dyna)\n\nAurous(dyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1824"} {"premises": "The lara bolster the tull. The lara commission the tull. The lara is licenced. The lara is not fortieth. The lara is hearable. The lara is affable. The lara is monoatomic. The lara undergrow the tull. The tull does not chase the lara. The tull commission the lara. The tull is licenced. The tull is fortieth. The tull is not hearable. The tull is monoatomic. The tull undergrow the lara. If something undergrow the lara then it undergrow the tull. If something bolster the lara and it commission the lara then it is monoatomic. If something is licenced and it undergrow the tull then it bolster the tull. If something is hearable and it commission the tull then it bolster the lara. If something bolster the tull and it is not hearable then the tull commission the lara. If something commission the tull and the tull bolster the lara then it does not eat the lara. The tull commission the lara.", "logic": "\nBolster(lara, tull)\nCommission(lara, tull)\nLicenced(lara)\nnot Fortieth(lara)\nHearable(lara)\nAffable(lara)\nMonoatomic(lara)\nUndergrow(lara, tull)\nnot Bolster(tull, lara)\nCommission(tull, lara)\nLicenced(tull)\nFortieth(tull)\nnot Hearable(tull)\nMonoatomic(tull)\nUndergrow(tull, lara)\nforall x (Undergrow(x, lara) -> Undergrow(x, tull))\nforall x (Bolster(x, lara) and Commission(x, lara) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Licenced(x) and Undergrow(x, tull) -> Bolster(x, tull))\nforall x (Hearable(x) and Commission(x, tull) -> Bolster(x, lara))\nforall x (Bolster(x, tull) and not Hearable(x) -> Commission(tull, lara))\nforall x (Commission(x, tull) and Bolster(tull, lara) -> not Commission(x, lara))\n\nCommission(tull, lara)\n\ntherefore Commission(tull, lara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The terrell birl the ashton. The terrell formulate the ashton. The terrell is plumbic. The terrell is not bumpkinly. The terrell is solid. The terrell is reverend. The terrell is eidetic. The terrell grok the ashton. The ashton does not chase the terrell. The ashton formulate the terrell. The ashton is plumbic. The ashton is bumpkinly. The ashton is not solid. The ashton is eidetic. The ashton grok the terrell. If something grok the terrell then it grok the ashton. If something birl the terrell and it formulate the terrell then it is eidetic. If something is plumbic and it grok the ashton then it birl the ashton. If something is solid and it formulate the ashton then it birl the terrell. If something birl the ashton and it is not solid then the ashton formulate the terrell. If something formulate the ashton and the ashton birl the terrell then it does not eat the terrell. The ashton is not plumbic.", "logic": "\nBirl(terrell, ashton)\nFormulate(terrell, ashton)\nPlumbic(terrell)\nnot Bumpkinly(terrell)\nSolid(terrell)\nReverend(terrell)\nEidetic(terrell)\nGrok(terrell, ashton)\nnot Birl(ashton, terrell)\nFormulate(ashton, terrell)\nPlumbic(ashton)\nBumpkinly(ashton)\nnot Solid(ashton)\nEidetic(ashton)\nGrok(ashton, terrell)\nforall x (Grok(x, terrell) -> Grok(x, ashton))\nforall x (Birl(x, terrell) and Formulate(x, terrell) -> Eidetic(x))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) and Grok(x, ashton) -> Birl(x, ashton))\nforall x (Solid(x) and Formulate(x, ashton) -> Birl(x, terrell))\nforall x (Birl(x, ashton) and not Solid(x) -> Formulate(ashton, terrell))\nforall x (Formulate(x, ashton) and Birl(ashton, terrell) -> not Formulate(x, terrell))\n\nnot Plumbic(ashton)\n\ntherefore Plumbic(ashton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The aggie collar the cleo. The aggie reform the cleo. The aggie is gigantic. The aggie is not faecal. The aggie is astral. The aggie is affine. The aggie is glaring. The aggie demean the cleo. The cleo does not chase the aggie. The cleo reform the aggie. The cleo is gigantic. The cleo is faecal. The cleo is not astral. The cleo is glaring. The cleo demean the aggie. If something demean the aggie then it demean the cleo. If something collar the aggie and it reform the aggie then it is glaring. If something is gigantic and it demean the cleo then it collar the cleo. If something is astral and it reform the cleo then it collar the aggie. If something collar the cleo and it is not astral then the cleo reform the aggie. If something reform the cleo and the cleo collar the aggie then it does not eat the aggie. The aggie collar the aggie.", "logic": "\nCollar(aggie, cleo)\nReform(aggie, cleo)\nGigantic(aggie)\nnot Faecal(aggie)\nAstral(aggie)\nAffine(aggie)\nGlaring(aggie)\nDemean(aggie, cleo)\nnot Collar(cleo, aggie)\nReform(cleo, aggie)\nGigantic(cleo)\nFaecal(cleo)\nnot Astral(cleo)\nGlaring(cleo)\nDemean(cleo, aggie)\nforall x (Demean(x, aggie) -> Demean(x, cleo))\nforall x (Collar(x, aggie) and Reform(x, aggie) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Gigantic(x) and Demean(x, cleo) -> Collar(x, cleo))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Reform(x, cleo) -> Collar(x, aggie))\nforall x (Collar(x, cleo) and not Astral(x) -> Reform(cleo, aggie))\nforall x (Reform(x, cleo) and Collar(cleo, aggie) -> not Reform(x, aggie))\n\nCollar(aggie, aggie)\n\nAstral(aggie) and Reform(aggie, cleo) and forall x (Astral(x) and Reform(x, cleo) -> Collar(x, aggie)) -> therefore Collar(aggie, aggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The randy obtrude the flori. The randy toot the flori. The randy is hyaloid. The randy is not fluffy. The randy is skilled. The randy is crashing. The randy is peruked. The randy cage the flori. The flori does not chase the randy. The flori toot the randy. The flori is hyaloid. The flori is fluffy. The flori is not skilled. The flori is peruked. The flori cage the randy. If something cage the randy then it cage the flori. If something obtrude the randy and it toot the randy then it is peruked. If something is hyaloid and it cage the flori then it obtrude the flori. If something is skilled and it toot the flori then it obtrude the randy. If something obtrude the flori and it is not skilled then the flori toot the randy. If something toot the flori and the flori obtrude the randy then it does not eat the randy. The flori does not see the flori.", "logic": "\nObtrude(randy, flori)\nToot(randy, flori)\nHyaloid(randy)\nnot Fluffy(randy)\nSkilled(randy)\nCrashing(randy)\nPeruked(randy)\nCage(randy, flori)\nnot Obtrude(flori, randy)\nToot(flori, randy)\nHyaloid(flori)\nFluffy(flori)\nnot Skilled(flori)\nPeruked(flori)\nCage(flori, randy)\nforall x (Cage(x, randy) -> Cage(x, flori))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, randy) and Toot(x, randy) -> Peruked(x))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Cage(x, flori) -> Obtrude(x, flori))\nforall x (Skilled(x) and Toot(x, flori) -> Obtrude(x, randy))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, flori) and not Skilled(x) -> Toot(flori, randy))\nforall x (Toot(x, flori) and Obtrude(flori, randy) -> not Toot(x, randy))\n\nnot Cage(flori, flori)\n\nCage(flori, randy) and forall x (Cage(x, randy) -> Cage(x, flori)) -> therefore Cage(flori, flori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The luella flurry the meggy. The luella drown the meggy. The luella is cyanogenic. The luella is not stable. The luella is enolic. The luella is palatable. The luella is phreatic. The luella reclassify the meggy. The meggy does not chase the luella. The meggy drown the luella. The meggy is cyanogenic. The meggy is stable. The meggy is not enolic. The meggy is phreatic. The meggy reclassify the luella. If something reclassify the luella then it reclassify the meggy. If something flurry the luella and it drown the luella then it is phreatic. If something is cyanogenic and it reclassify the meggy then it flurry the meggy. If something is enolic and it drown the meggy then it flurry the luella. If something flurry the meggy and it is not enolic then the meggy drown the luella. If something drown the meggy and the meggy flurry the luella then it does not eat the luella. The meggy flurry the meggy.", "logic": "\nFlurry(luella, meggy)\nDrown(luella, meggy)\nCyanogenic(luella)\nnot Stable(luella)\nEnolic(luella)\nPalatable(luella)\nPhreatic(luella)\nReclassify(luella, meggy)\nnot Flurry(meggy, luella)\nDrown(meggy, luella)\nCyanogenic(meggy)\nStable(meggy)\nnot Enolic(meggy)\nPhreatic(meggy)\nReclassify(meggy, luella)\nforall x (Reclassify(x, luella) -> Reclassify(x, meggy))\nforall x (Flurry(x, luella) and Drown(x, luella) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Reclassify(x, meggy) -> Flurry(x, meggy))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Drown(x, meggy) -> Flurry(x, luella))\nforall x (Flurry(x, meggy) and not Enolic(x) -> Drown(meggy, luella))\nforall x (Drown(x, meggy) and Flurry(meggy, luella) -> not Drown(x, luella))\n\nFlurry(meggy, meggy)\n\nReclassify(meggy, luella) and forall x (Reclassify(x, luella) -> Reclassify(x, meggy)) -> therefore Reclassify(meggy, meggy) Cyanogenic(meggy) and Reclassify(meggy, meggy) and forall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Reclassify(x, meggy) -> Flurry(x, meggy)) -> therefore Flurry(meggy, meggy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The faina chevvy the liz. The faina idealise the liz. The faina is madcap. The faina is not reviving. The faina is kindly. The faina is mosaic. The faina is gainful. The faina spurt the liz. The liz does not chase the faina. The liz idealise the faina. The liz is madcap. The liz is reviving. The liz is not kindly. The liz is gainful. The liz spurt the faina. If something spurt the faina then it spurt the liz. If something chevvy the faina and it idealise the faina then it is gainful. If something is madcap and it spurt the liz then it chevvy the liz. If something is kindly and it idealise the liz then it chevvy the faina. If something chevvy the liz and it is not kindly then the liz idealise the faina. If something idealise the liz and the liz chevvy the faina then it does not eat the faina. The liz does not chase the liz.", "logic": "\nChevvy(faina, liz)\nIdealise(faina, liz)\nMadcap(faina)\nnot Reviving(faina)\nKindly(faina)\nMosaic(faina)\nGainful(faina)\nSpurt(faina, liz)\nnot Chevvy(liz, faina)\nIdealise(liz, faina)\nMadcap(liz)\nReviving(liz)\nnot Kindly(liz)\nGainful(liz)\nSpurt(liz, faina)\nforall x (Spurt(x, faina) -> Spurt(x, liz))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, faina) and Idealise(x, faina) -> Gainful(x))\nforall x (Madcap(x) and Spurt(x, liz) -> Chevvy(x, liz))\nforall x (Kindly(x) and Idealise(x, liz) -> Chevvy(x, faina))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, liz) and not Kindly(x) -> Idealise(liz, faina))\nforall x (Idealise(x, liz) and Chevvy(liz, faina) -> not Idealise(x, faina))\n\nnot Chevvy(liz, liz)\n\nSpurt(liz, faina) and forall x (Spurt(x, faina) -> Spurt(x, liz)) -> therefore Spurt(liz, liz) Madcap(liz) and Spurt(liz, liz) and forall x (Madcap(x) and Spurt(x, liz) -> Chevvy(x, liz)) -> therefore Chevvy(liz, liz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The keri disjoint the lynnea. The keri shell the lynnea. The keri is seamy. The keri is not burdensome. The keri is innocent. The keri is panoplied. The keri is crackers. The keri subjugate the lynnea. The lynnea does not chase the keri. The lynnea shell the keri. The lynnea is seamy. The lynnea is burdensome. The lynnea is not innocent. The lynnea is crackers. The lynnea subjugate the keri. If something subjugate the keri then it subjugate the lynnea. If something disjoint the keri and it shell the keri then it is crackers. If something is seamy and it subjugate the lynnea then it disjoint the lynnea. If something is innocent and it shell the lynnea then it disjoint the keri. If something disjoint the lynnea and it is not innocent then the lynnea shell the keri. If something shell the lynnea and the lynnea disjoint the keri then it does not eat the keri. The lynnea is not panoplied.", "logic": "\nDisjoint(keri, lynnea)\nShell(keri, lynnea)\nSeamy(keri)\nnot Burdensome(keri)\nInnocent(keri)\nPanoplied(keri)\nCrackers(keri)\nSubjugate(keri, lynnea)\nnot Disjoint(lynnea, keri)\nShell(lynnea, keri)\nSeamy(lynnea)\nBurdensome(lynnea)\nnot Innocent(lynnea)\nCrackers(lynnea)\nSubjugate(lynnea, keri)\nforall x (Subjugate(x, keri) -> Subjugate(x, lynnea))\nforall x (Disjoint(x, keri) and Shell(x, keri) -> Crackers(x))\nforall x (Seamy(x) and Subjugate(x, lynnea) -> Disjoint(x, lynnea))\nforall x (Innocent(x) and Shell(x, lynnea) -> Disjoint(x, keri))\nforall x (Disjoint(x, lynnea) and not Innocent(x) -> Shell(lynnea, keri))\nforall x (Shell(x, lynnea) and Disjoint(lynnea, keri) -> not Shell(x, keri))\n\nnot Panoplied(lynnea)\n\nnot Panoplied(lynnea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The amelie caucus the maribel. The amelie butcher the maribel. The amelie is blindfold. The amelie is not buff. The amelie is adjective. The amelie is shocked. The amelie is unwise. The amelie caddie the maribel. The maribel does not chase the amelie. The maribel butcher the amelie. The maribel is blindfold. The maribel is buff. The maribel is not adjective. The maribel is unwise. The maribel caddie the amelie. If something caddie the amelie then it caddie the maribel. If something caucus the amelie and it butcher the amelie then it is unwise. If something is blindfold and it caddie the maribel then it caucus the maribel. If something is adjective and it butcher the maribel then it caucus the amelie. If something caucus the maribel and it is not adjective then the maribel butcher the amelie. If something butcher the maribel and the maribel caucus the amelie then it does not eat the amelie. The maribel butcher the maribel.", "logic": "\nCaucus(amelie, maribel)\nButcher(amelie, maribel)\nBlindfold(amelie)\nnot Buff(amelie)\nAdjective(amelie)\nShocked(amelie)\nUnwise(amelie)\nCaddie(amelie, maribel)\nnot Caucus(maribel, amelie)\nButcher(maribel, amelie)\nBlindfold(maribel)\nBuff(maribel)\nnot Adjective(maribel)\nUnwise(maribel)\nCaddie(maribel, amelie)\nforall x (Caddie(x, amelie) -> Caddie(x, maribel))\nforall x (Caucus(x, amelie) and Butcher(x, amelie) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) and Caddie(x, maribel) -> Caucus(x, maribel))\nforall x (Adjective(x) and Butcher(x, maribel) -> Caucus(x, amelie))\nforall x (Caucus(x, maribel) and not Adjective(x) -> Butcher(maribel, amelie))\nforall x (Butcher(x, maribel) and Caucus(maribel, amelie) -> not Butcher(x, amelie))\n\nButcher(maribel, maribel)\n\nButcher(maribel, maribel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The jimbo overpay the carolyn. The jimbo buttweld the carolyn. The jimbo is wicked. The jimbo is not excrescent. The jimbo is unsightly. The jimbo is overnice. The jimbo is fragrant. The jimbo parrot the carolyn. The carolyn does not chase the jimbo. The carolyn buttweld the jimbo. The carolyn is wicked. The carolyn is excrescent. The carolyn is not unsightly. The carolyn is fragrant. The carolyn parrot the jimbo. If something parrot the jimbo then it parrot the carolyn. If something overpay the jimbo and it buttweld the jimbo then it is fragrant. If something is wicked and it parrot the carolyn then it overpay the carolyn. If something is unsightly and it buttweld the carolyn then it overpay the jimbo. If something overpay the carolyn and it is not unsightly then the carolyn buttweld the jimbo. If something buttweld the carolyn and the carolyn overpay the jimbo then it does not eat the jimbo. The jimbo does not see the jimbo.", "logic": "\nOverpay(jimbo, carolyn)\nButtweld(jimbo, carolyn)\nWicked(jimbo)\nnot Excrescent(jimbo)\nUnsightly(jimbo)\nOvernice(jimbo)\nFragrant(jimbo)\nParrot(jimbo, carolyn)\nnot Overpay(carolyn, jimbo)\nButtweld(carolyn, jimbo)\nWicked(carolyn)\nExcrescent(carolyn)\nnot Unsightly(carolyn)\nFragrant(carolyn)\nParrot(carolyn, jimbo)\nforall x (Parrot(x, jimbo) -> Parrot(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Overpay(x, jimbo) and Buttweld(x, jimbo) -> Fragrant(x))\nforall x (Wicked(x) and Parrot(x, carolyn) -> Overpay(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Unsightly(x) and Buttweld(x, carolyn) -> Overpay(x, jimbo))\nforall x (Overpay(x, carolyn) and not Unsightly(x) -> Buttweld(carolyn, jimbo))\nforall x (Buttweld(x, carolyn) and Overpay(carolyn, jimbo) -> not Buttweld(x, jimbo))\n\nnot Parrot(jimbo, jimbo)\n\nnot Parrot(jimbo, jimbo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The edith fester the brandais. The edith unfrock the brandais. The edith is arranged. The edith is not papillose. The edith is arborous. The edith is ungracious. The edith is parented. The edith assail the brandais. The brandais does not chase the edith. The brandais unfrock the edith. The brandais is arranged. The brandais is papillose. The brandais is not arborous. The brandais is parented. The brandais assail the edith. If something assail the edith then it assail the brandais. If something fester the edith and it unfrock the edith then it is parented. If something is arranged and it assail the brandais then it fester the brandais. If something is arborous and it unfrock the brandais then it fester the edith. If something fester the brandais and it is not arborous then the brandais unfrock the edith. If something unfrock the brandais and the brandais fester the edith then it does not eat the edith. The edith unfrock the edith.", "logic": "\nFester(edith, brandais)\nUnfrock(edith, brandais)\nArranged(edith)\nnot Papillose(edith)\nArborous(edith)\nUngracious(edith)\nParented(edith)\nAssail(edith, brandais)\nnot Fester(brandais, edith)\nUnfrock(brandais, edith)\nArranged(brandais)\nPapillose(brandais)\nnot Arborous(brandais)\nParented(brandais)\nAssail(brandais, edith)\nforall x (Assail(x, edith) -> Assail(x, brandais))\nforall x (Fester(x, edith) and Unfrock(x, edith) -> Parented(x))\nforall x (Arranged(x) and Assail(x, brandais) -> Fester(x, brandais))\nforall x (Arborous(x) and Unfrock(x, brandais) -> Fester(x, edith))\nforall x (Fester(x, brandais) and not Arborous(x) -> Unfrock(brandais, edith))\nforall x (Unfrock(x, brandais) and Fester(brandais, edith) -> not Unfrock(x, edith))\n\nUnfrock(edith, edith)\n\nUnfrock(edith, edith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1835"} {"premises": "The corwin weed the meredithe. The corwin stalk the meredithe. The corwin is debased. The corwin is speedy. The corwin is unhealthy. The corwin is hallowed. The corwin fake the meredithe. The meredithe weed the corwin. The meredithe stalk the corwin. The meredithe is debased. The meredithe is speedy. The meredithe is unhealthy. The meredithe is homologous. The meredithe is hallowed. The meredithe fake the corwin. If something is speedy and homologous then it fake the corwin. If something weed the corwin and the corwin fake the meredithe then the corwin is homologous. The meredithe is hallowed.", "logic": "\nWeed(corwin, meredithe)\nStalk(corwin, meredithe)\nDebased(corwin)\nSpeedy(corwin)\nUnhealthy(corwin)\nHallowed(corwin)\nFake(corwin, meredithe)\nWeed(meredithe, corwin)\nStalk(meredithe, corwin)\nDebased(meredithe)\nSpeedy(meredithe)\nUnhealthy(meredithe)\nHomologous(meredithe)\nHallowed(meredithe)\nFake(meredithe, corwin)\nforall x (Speedy(x) and Homologous(x) -> Fake(x, corwin))\nforall x (Weed(x, corwin) and Fake(corwin, meredithe) -> Homologous(corwin))\n\nHallowed(meredithe)\n\ntherefore Hallowed(meredithe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The edith demolish the sinead. The edith invigorate the sinead. The edith is bosomy. The edith is irritating. The edith is chaetal. The edith is tenderised. The edith reignite the sinead. The sinead demolish the edith. The sinead invigorate the edith. The sinead is bosomy. The sinead is irritating. The sinead is chaetal. The sinead is dreamlike. The sinead is tenderised. The sinead reignite the edith. If something is irritating and dreamlike then it reignite the edith. If something demolish the edith and the edith reignite the sinead then the edith is dreamlike. The sinead is not bosomy.", "logic": "\nDemolish(edith, sinead)\nInvigorate(edith, sinead)\nBosomy(edith)\nIrritating(edith)\nChaetal(edith)\nTenderised(edith)\nReignite(edith, sinead)\nDemolish(sinead, edith)\nInvigorate(sinead, edith)\nBosomy(sinead)\nIrritating(sinead)\nChaetal(sinead)\nDreamlike(sinead)\nTenderised(sinead)\nReignite(sinead, edith)\nforall x (Irritating(x) and Dreamlike(x) -> Reignite(x, edith))\nforall x (Demolish(x, edith) and Reignite(edith, sinead) -> Dreamlike(edith))\n\nnot Bosomy(sinead)\n\ntherefore Bosomy(sinead)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The greg dangle the sheilah. The greg supercede the sheilah. The greg is teenaged. The greg is lapidarian. The greg is bated. The greg is sideways. The greg notice the sheilah. The sheilah dangle the greg. The sheilah supercede the greg. The sheilah is teenaged. The sheilah is lapidarian. The sheilah is bated. The sheilah is oldish. The sheilah is sideways. The sheilah notice the greg. If something is lapidarian and oldish then it notice the greg. If something dangle the greg and the greg notice the sheilah then the greg is oldish. The greg is oldish.", "logic": "\nDangle(greg, sheilah)\nSupercede(greg, sheilah)\nTeenaged(greg)\nLapidarian(greg)\nBated(greg)\nSideways(greg)\nNotice(greg, sheilah)\nDangle(sheilah, greg)\nSupercede(sheilah, greg)\nTeenaged(sheilah)\nLapidarian(sheilah)\nBated(sheilah)\nOldish(sheilah)\nSideways(sheilah)\nNotice(sheilah, greg)\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) and Oldish(x) -> Notice(x, greg))\nforall x (Dangle(x, greg) and Notice(greg, sheilah) -> Oldish(greg))\n\nOldish(greg)\n\nDangle(sheilah, greg) and Notice(greg, sheilah) and forall x (Dangle(x, greg) and Notice(greg, sheilah) -> Oldish(greg)) -> therefore Oldish(greg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The lorri suspire the carolin. The lorri impeach the carolin. The lorri is butch. The lorri is anorthitic. The lorri is careless. The lorri is decreasing. The lorri overstress the carolin. The carolin suspire the lorri. The carolin impeach the lorri. The carolin is butch. The carolin is anorthitic. The carolin is careless. The carolin is hebraic. The carolin is decreasing. The carolin overstress the lorri. If something is anorthitic and hebraic then it overstress the lorri. If something suspire the lorri and the lorri overstress the carolin then the lorri is hebraic. The lorri is not hebraic.", "logic": "\nSuspire(lorri, carolin)\nImpeach(lorri, carolin)\nButch(lorri)\nAnorthitic(lorri)\nCareless(lorri)\nDecreasing(lorri)\nOverstress(lorri, carolin)\nSuspire(carolin, lorri)\nImpeach(carolin, lorri)\nButch(carolin)\nAnorthitic(carolin)\nCareless(carolin)\nHebraic(carolin)\nDecreasing(carolin)\nOverstress(carolin, lorri)\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Overstress(x, lorri))\nforall x (Suspire(x, lorri) and Overstress(lorri, carolin) -> Hebraic(lorri))\n\nnot Hebraic(lorri)\n\nSuspire(carolin, lorri) and Overstress(lorri, carolin) and forall x (Suspire(x, lorri) and Overstress(lorri, carolin) -> Hebraic(lorri)) -> therefore Hebraic(lorri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The hedi camphorate the janela. The hedi bullyrag the janela. The hedi is nonnatural. The hedi is hackneyed. The hedi is unmedical. The hedi is polyphase. The hedi motorize the janela. The janela camphorate the hedi. The janela bullyrag the hedi. The janela is nonnatural. The janela is hackneyed. The janela is unmedical. The janela is nicene. The janela is polyphase. The janela motorize the hedi. If something is hackneyed and nicene then it motorize the hedi. If something camphorate the hedi and the hedi motorize the janela then the hedi is nicene. The hedi motorize the hedi.", "logic": "\nCamphorate(hedi, janela)\nBullyrag(hedi, janela)\nNonnatural(hedi)\nHackneyed(hedi)\nUnmedical(hedi)\nPolyphase(hedi)\nMotorize(hedi, janela)\nCamphorate(janela, hedi)\nBullyrag(janela, hedi)\nNonnatural(janela)\nHackneyed(janela)\nUnmedical(janela)\nNicene(janela)\nPolyphase(janela)\nMotorize(janela, hedi)\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) and Nicene(x) -> Motorize(x, hedi))\nforall x (Camphorate(x, hedi) and Motorize(hedi, janela) -> Nicene(hedi))\n\nMotorize(hedi, hedi)\n\nCamphorate(janela, hedi) and Motorize(hedi, janela) and forall x (Camphorate(x, hedi) and Motorize(hedi, janela) -> Nicene(hedi)) -> therefore Nicene(hedi) Hackneyed(hedi) and Nicene(hedi) and forall x (Hackneyed(x) and Nicene(x) -> Motorize(x, hedi)) -> therefore Motorize(hedi, hedi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The woodrow ensile the lemmy. The woodrow deodourise the lemmy. The woodrow is bandaged. The woodrow is midweekly. The woodrow is christian. The woodrow is scalar. The woodrow share the lemmy. The lemmy ensile the woodrow. The lemmy deodourise the woodrow. The lemmy is bandaged. The lemmy is midweekly. The lemmy is christian. The lemmy is distaff. The lemmy is scalar. The lemmy share the woodrow. If something is midweekly and distaff then it share the woodrow. If something ensile the woodrow and the woodrow share the lemmy then the woodrow is distaff. The woodrow does not like the woodrow.", "logic": "\nEnsile(woodrow, lemmy)\nDeodourise(woodrow, lemmy)\nBandaged(woodrow)\nMidweekly(woodrow)\nChristian(woodrow)\nScalar(woodrow)\nShare(woodrow, lemmy)\nEnsile(lemmy, woodrow)\nDeodourise(lemmy, woodrow)\nBandaged(lemmy)\nMidweekly(lemmy)\nChristian(lemmy)\nDistaff(lemmy)\nScalar(lemmy)\nShare(lemmy, woodrow)\nforall x (Midweekly(x) and Distaff(x) -> Share(x, woodrow))\nforall x (Ensile(x, woodrow) and Share(woodrow, lemmy) -> Distaff(woodrow))\n\nnot Share(woodrow, woodrow)\n\nEnsile(lemmy, woodrow) and Share(woodrow, lemmy) and forall x (Ensile(x, woodrow) and Share(woodrow, lemmy) -> Distaff(woodrow)) -> therefore Distaff(woodrow) Midweekly(woodrow) and Distaff(woodrow) and forall x (Midweekly(x) and Distaff(x) -> Share(x, woodrow)) -> therefore Share(woodrow, woodrow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The ellissa defat the jemmie. The ellissa fellate the jemmie. The ellissa is uninvolved. The ellissa is tractive. The ellissa is biweekly. The ellissa is cinematic. The ellissa bump the jemmie. The jemmie defat the ellissa. The jemmie fellate the ellissa. The jemmie is uninvolved. The jemmie is tractive. The jemmie is biweekly. The jemmie is nosey. The jemmie is cinematic. The jemmie bump the ellissa. If something is tractive and nosey then it bump the ellissa. If something defat the ellissa and the ellissa bump the jemmie then the ellissa is nosey. The jemmie does not eat the jemmie.", "logic": "\nDefat(ellissa, jemmie)\nFellate(ellissa, jemmie)\nUninvolved(ellissa)\nTractive(ellissa)\nBiweekly(ellissa)\nCinematic(ellissa)\nBump(ellissa, jemmie)\nDefat(jemmie, ellissa)\nFellate(jemmie, ellissa)\nUninvolved(jemmie)\nTractive(jemmie)\nBiweekly(jemmie)\nNosey(jemmie)\nCinematic(jemmie)\nBump(jemmie, ellissa)\nforall x (Tractive(x) and Nosey(x) -> Bump(x, ellissa))\nforall x (Defat(x, ellissa) and Bump(ellissa, jemmie) -> Nosey(ellissa))\n\nnot Fellate(jemmie, jemmie)\n\nnot Fellate(jemmie, jemmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The fulton glamourize the gwynne. The fulton keen the gwynne. The fulton is irritated. The fulton is nicaraguan. The fulton is agraphic. The fulton is agonistic. The fulton crumb the gwynne. The gwynne glamourize the fulton. The gwynne keen the fulton. The gwynne is irritated. The gwynne is nicaraguan. The gwynne is agraphic. The gwynne is slurred. The gwynne is agonistic. The gwynne crumb the fulton. If something is nicaraguan and slurred then it crumb the fulton. If something glamourize the fulton and the fulton crumb the gwynne then the fulton is slurred. The fulton keen the fulton.", "logic": "\nGlamourize(fulton, gwynne)\nKeen(fulton, gwynne)\nIrritated(fulton)\nNicaraguan(fulton)\nAgraphic(fulton)\nAgonistic(fulton)\nCrumb(fulton, gwynne)\nGlamourize(gwynne, fulton)\nKeen(gwynne, fulton)\nIrritated(gwynne)\nNicaraguan(gwynne)\nAgraphic(gwynne)\nSlurred(gwynne)\nAgonistic(gwynne)\nCrumb(gwynne, fulton)\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) and Slurred(x) -> Crumb(x, fulton))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, fulton) and Crumb(fulton, gwynne) -> Slurred(fulton))\n\nKeen(fulton, fulton)\n\nKeen(fulton, fulton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The jeffry page the rozele. The jeffry complete the rozele. The jeffry is nonskid. The jeffry is funereal. The jeffry is mirrored. The jeffry is slanderous. The jeffry purport the rozele. The rozele page the jeffry. The rozele complete the jeffry. The rozele is nonskid. The rozele is funereal. The rozele is mirrored. The rozele is fricative. The rozele is slanderous. The rozele purport the jeffry. If something is funereal and fricative then it purport the jeffry. If something page the jeffry and the jeffry purport the rozele then the jeffry is fricative. The rozele does not like the rozele.", "logic": "\nPage(jeffry, rozele)\nComplete(jeffry, rozele)\nNonskid(jeffry)\nFunereal(jeffry)\nMirrored(jeffry)\nSlanderous(jeffry)\nPurport(jeffry, rozele)\nPage(rozele, jeffry)\nComplete(rozele, jeffry)\nNonskid(rozele)\nFunereal(rozele)\nMirrored(rozele)\nFricative(rozele)\nSlanderous(rozele)\nPurport(rozele, jeffry)\nforall x (Funereal(x) and Fricative(x) -> Purport(x, jeffry))\nforall x (Page(x, jeffry) and Purport(jeffry, rozele) -> Fricative(jeffry))\n\nnot Purport(rozele, rozele)\n\nnot Purport(rozele, rozele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The vivianne suffocate the odelinda. The vivianne prejudge the odelinda. The vivianne is hygienical. The vivianne is ninefold. The vivianne is broadside. The vivianne is zygotic. The vivianne lateralize the odelinda. The odelinda suffocate the vivianne. The odelinda prejudge the vivianne. The odelinda is hygienical. The odelinda is ninefold. The odelinda is broadside. The odelinda is lashing. The odelinda is zygotic. The odelinda lateralize the vivianne. If something is ninefold and lashing then it lateralize the vivianne. If something suffocate the vivianne and the vivianne lateralize the odelinda then the vivianne is lashing. The odelinda suffocate the odelinda.", "logic": "\nSuffocate(vivianne, odelinda)\nPrejudge(vivianne, odelinda)\nHygienical(vivianne)\nNinefold(vivianne)\nBroadside(vivianne)\nZygotic(vivianne)\nLateralize(vivianne, odelinda)\nSuffocate(odelinda, vivianne)\nPrejudge(odelinda, vivianne)\nHygienical(odelinda)\nNinefold(odelinda)\nBroadside(odelinda)\nLashing(odelinda)\nZygotic(odelinda)\nLateralize(odelinda, vivianne)\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Lashing(x) -> Lateralize(x, vivianne))\nforall x (Suffocate(x, vivianne) and Lateralize(vivianne, odelinda) -> Lashing(vivianne))\n\nSuffocate(odelinda, odelinda)\n\nSuffocate(odelinda, odelinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Bruno is cubital. Bruno is unmeasured. Everard is tipsy. Everard is camp. Everard is grasping. Everard is pitched. Everard is insurable. Aleda is tipsy. Aleda is camp. Aleda is insurable. Kristos is cubital. Kristos is tipsy. Kristos is unmeasured. Kristos is camp. Kristos is pitched. Kristos is insurable. All cubital people are tipsy. All unmeasured, camp people are pitched. All grasping, pitched people are tipsy. If someone is pitched then they are cubital. All pitched people are unmeasured. Cold, pitched people are camp. If someone is camp and tipsy then they are unmeasured. If Bruno is grasping and Bruno is unmeasured then Bruno is pitched. Kristos is camp.", "logic": "\nCubital(bruno)\nUnmeasured(bruno)\nTipsy(everard)\nCamp(everard)\nGrasping(everard)\nPitched(everard)\nInsurable(everard)\nTipsy(aleda)\nCamp(aleda)\nInsurable(aleda)\nCubital(kristos)\nTipsy(kristos)\nUnmeasured(kristos)\nCamp(kristos)\nPitched(kristos)\nInsurable(kristos)\nforall x (Cubital(x) -> Tipsy(x))\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) and Camp(x) -> Pitched(x))\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Pitched(x) -> Tipsy(x))\nforall x (Pitched(x) -> Cubital(x))\nforall x (Pitched(x) -> Unmeasured(x))\nforall x (Tipsy(x) and Pitched(x) -> Camp(x))\nforall x (Camp(x) and Tipsy(x) -> Unmeasured(x))\nGrasping(bruno) and Unmeasured(bruno) -> Pitched(bruno)\n\nCamp(kristos)\n\ntherefore Camp(kristos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Emelia is guardant. Emelia is fulgid. Winny is incoherent. Winny is paraplegic. Winny is funny. Winny is troublous. Winny is cushy. Vincents is incoherent. Vincents is paraplegic. Vincents is cushy. Tilly is guardant. Tilly is incoherent. Tilly is fulgid. Tilly is paraplegic. Tilly is troublous. Tilly is cushy. All guardant people are incoherent. All fulgid, paraplegic people are troublous. All funny, troublous people are incoherent. If someone is troublous then they are guardant. All troublous people are fulgid. Cold, troublous people are paraplegic. If someone is paraplegic and incoherent then they are fulgid. If Emelia is funny and Emelia is fulgid then Emelia is troublous. Emelia is not guardant.", "logic": "\nGuardant(emelia)\nFulgid(emelia)\nIncoherent(winny)\nParaplegic(winny)\nFunny(winny)\nTroublous(winny)\nCushy(winny)\nIncoherent(vincents)\nParaplegic(vincents)\nCushy(vincents)\nGuardant(tilly)\nIncoherent(tilly)\nFulgid(tilly)\nParaplegic(tilly)\nTroublous(tilly)\nCushy(tilly)\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) and Paraplegic(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Funny(x) and Troublous(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and Troublous(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) and Incoherent(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nFunny(emelia) and Fulgid(emelia) -> Troublous(emelia)\n\nnot Guardant(emelia)\n\ntherefore Guardant(emelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Shira is wriggling. Shira is opalescent. Roselia is asphaltic. Roselia is harmonized. Roselia is acapnotic. Roselia is writhed. Roselia is minty. Rosita is asphaltic. Rosita is harmonized. Rosita is minty. Brittney is wriggling. Brittney is asphaltic. Brittney is opalescent. Brittney is harmonized. Brittney is writhed. Brittney is minty. All wriggling people are asphaltic. All opalescent, harmonized people are writhed. All acapnotic, writhed people are asphaltic. If someone is writhed then they are wriggling. All writhed people are opalescent. Cold, writhed people are harmonized. If someone is harmonized and asphaltic then they are opalescent. If Shira is acapnotic and Shira is opalescent then Shira is writhed. Rosita is opalescent.", "logic": "\nWriggling(shira)\nOpalescent(shira)\nAsphaltic(roselia)\nHarmonized(roselia)\nAcapnotic(roselia)\nWrithed(roselia)\nMinty(roselia)\nAsphaltic(rosita)\nHarmonized(rosita)\nMinty(rosita)\nWriggling(brittney)\nAsphaltic(brittney)\nOpalescent(brittney)\nHarmonized(brittney)\nWrithed(brittney)\nMinty(brittney)\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Writhed(x))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) and Writhed(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Writhed(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nforall x (Writhed(x) -> Opalescent(x))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and Writhed(x) -> Harmonized(x))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and Asphaltic(x) -> Opalescent(x))\nAcapnotic(shira) and Opalescent(shira) -> Writhed(shira)\n\nOpalescent(rosita)\n\nHarmonized(rosita) and Asphaltic(rosita) and forall x (Harmonized(x) and Asphaltic(x) -> Opalescent(x)) -> therefore Opalescent(rosita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Elyse is ungraceful. Elyse is marginal. Nikos is revengeful. Nikos is littler. Nikos is cognisable. Nikos is gauzy. Nikos is splashed. Maybelle is revengeful. Maybelle is littler. Maybelle is splashed. Kathie is ungraceful. Kathie is revengeful. Kathie is marginal. Kathie is littler. Kathie is gauzy. Kathie is splashed. All ungraceful people are revengeful. All marginal, littler people are gauzy. All cognisable, gauzy people are revengeful. If someone is gauzy then they are ungraceful. All gauzy people are marginal. Cold, gauzy people are littler. If someone is littler and revengeful then they are marginal. If Elyse is cognisable and Elyse is marginal then Elyse is gauzy. Elyse is not revengeful.", "logic": "\nUngraceful(elyse)\nMarginal(elyse)\nRevengeful(nikos)\nLittler(nikos)\nCognisable(nikos)\nGauzy(nikos)\nSplashed(nikos)\nRevengeful(maybelle)\nLittler(maybelle)\nSplashed(maybelle)\nUngraceful(kathie)\nRevengeful(kathie)\nMarginal(kathie)\nLittler(kathie)\nGauzy(kathie)\nSplashed(kathie)\nforall x (Ungraceful(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) and Littler(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) and Gauzy(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Ungraceful(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) and Gauzy(x) -> Littler(x))\nforall x (Littler(x) and Revengeful(x) -> Marginal(x))\nCognisable(elyse) and Marginal(elyse) -> Gauzy(elyse)\n\nnot Revengeful(elyse)\n\nUngraceful(elyse) and forall x (Ungraceful(x) -> Revengeful(x)) -> therefore Revengeful(elyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Ailyn is hereditary. Ailyn is burundian. Leila is belarusian. Leila is junior. Leila is enkindled. Leila is craggy. Leila is fingered. Hana is belarusian. Hana is junior. Hana is fingered. Alfonzo is hereditary. Alfonzo is belarusian. Alfonzo is burundian. Alfonzo is junior. Alfonzo is craggy. Alfonzo is fingered. All hereditary people are belarusian. All burundian, junior people are craggy. All enkindled, craggy people are belarusian. If someone is craggy then they are hereditary. All craggy people are burundian. Cold, craggy people are junior. If someone is junior and belarusian then they are burundian. If Ailyn is enkindled and Ailyn is burundian then Ailyn is craggy. Hana is craggy.", "logic": "\nHereditary(ailyn)\nBurundian(ailyn)\nBelarusian(leila)\nJunior(leila)\nEnkindled(leila)\nCraggy(leila)\nFingered(leila)\nBelarusian(hana)\nJunior(hana)\nFingered(hana)\nHereditary(alfonzo)\nBelarusian(alfonzo)\nBurundian(alfonzo)\nJunior(alfonzo)\nCraggy(alfonzo)\nFingered(alfonzo)\nforall x (Hereditary(x) -> Belarusian(x))\nforall x (Burundian(x) and Junior(x) -> Craggy(x))\nforall x (Enkindled(x) and Craggy(x) -> Belarusian(x))\nforall x (Craggy(x) -> Hereditary(x))\nforall x (Craggy(x) -> Burundian(x))\nforall x (Belarusian(x) and Craggy(x) -> Junior(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) and Belarusian(x) -> Burundian(x))\nEnkindled(ailyn) and Burundian(ailyn) -> Craggy(ailyn)\n\nCraggy(hana)\n\nJunior(hana) and Belarusian(hana) and forall x (Junior(x) and Belarusian(x) -> Burundian(x)) -> therefore Burundian(hana) Burundian(hana) and Junior(hana) and forall x (Burundian(x) and Junior(x) -> Craggy(x)) -> therefore Craggy(hana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Neddie is lidless. Neddie is portentous. Alejandra is overage. Alejandra is genoese. Alejandra is fastigiate. Alejandra is bicolour. Alejandra is oneiric. Emanuela is overage. Emanuela is genoese. Emanuela is oneiric. Moses is lidless. Moses is overage. Moses is portentous. Moses is genoese. Moses is bicolour. Moses is oneiric. All lidless people are overage. All portentous, genoese people are bicolour. All fastigiate, bicolour people are overage. If someone is bicolour then they are lidless. All bicolour people are portentous. Cold, bicolour people are genoese. If someone is genoese and overage then they are portentous. If Neddie is fastigiate and Neddie is portentous then Neddie is bicolour. Emanuela is not bicolour.", "logic": "\nLidless(neddie)\nPortentous(neddie)\nOverage(alejandra)\nGenoese(alejandra)\nFastigiate(alejandra)\nBicolour(alejandra)\nOneiric(alejandra)\nOverage(emanuela)\nGenoese(emanuela)\nOneiric(emanuela)\nLidless(moses)\nOverage(moses)\nPortentous(moses)\nGenoese(moses)\nBicolour(moses)\nOneiric(moses)\nforall x (Lidless(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Portentous(x) and Genoese(x) -> Bicolour(x))\nforall x (Fastigiate(x) and Bicolour(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) -> Lidless(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) -> Portentous(x))\nforall x (Overage(x) and Bicolour(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Genoese(x) and Overage(x) -> Portentous(x))\nFastigiate(neddie) and Portentous(neddie) -> Bicolour(neddie)\n\nnot Bicolour(emanuela)\n\nGenoese(emanuela) and Overage(emanuela) and forall x (Genoese(x) and Overage(x) -> Portentous(x)) -> therefore Portentous(emanuela) Portentous(emanuela) and Genoese(emanuela) and forall x (Portentous(x) and Genoese(x) -> Bicolour(x)) -> therefore Bicolour(emanuela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Hellene is pinstriped. Hellene is largish. Farah is mexican. Farah is cathedral. Farah is veteran. Farah is laxative. Farah is vested. Blanche is mexican. Blanche is cathedral. Blanche is vested. Suzie is pinstriped. Suzie is mexican. Suzie is largish. Suzie is cathedral. Suzie is laxative. Suzie is vested. All pinstriped people are mexican. All largish, cathedral people are laxative. All veteran, laxative people are mexican. If someone is laxative then they are pinstriped. All laxative people are largish. Cold, laxative people are cathedral. If someone is cathedral and mexican then they are largish. If Hellene is veteran and Hellene is largish then Hellene is laxative. Hellene is not laxative.", "logic": "\nPinstriped(hellene)\nLargish(hellene)\nMexican(farah)\nCathedral(farah)\nVeteran(farah)\nLaxative(farah)\nVested(farah)\nMexican(blanche)\nCathedral(blanche)\nVested(blanche)\nPinstriped(suzie)\nMexican(suzie)\nLargish(suzie)\nCathedral(suzie)\nLaxative(suzie)\nVested(suzie)\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Mexican(x))\nforall x (Largish(x) and Cathedral(x) -> Laxative(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Laxative(x) -> Mexican(x))\nforall x (Laxative(x) -> Pinstriped(x))\nforall x (Laxative(x) -> Largish(x))\nforall x (Mexican(x) and Laxative(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Mexican(x) -> Largish(x))\nVeteran(hellene) and Largish(hellene) -> Laxative(hellene)\n\nnot Laxative(hellene)\n\nforall x (Largish(x) and Cathedral(x) -> Laxative(x)) <- forall x (Mexican(x) and Laxative(x) -> Cathedral(x)) <- Veteran(hellene) and Largish(hellene) -> Laxative(hellene) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Annamaria is greased. Annamaria is formosan. Charleen is succulent. Charleen is caucasoid. Charleen is frizzy. Charleen is astounding. Charleen is briefless. Emory is succulent. Emory is caucasoid. Emory is briefless. Lucienne is greased. Lucienne is succulent. Lucienne is formosan. Lucienne is caucasoid. Lucienne is astounding. Lucienne is briefless. All greased people are succulent. All formosan, caucasoid people are astounding. All frizzy, astounding people are succulent. If someone is astounding then they are greased. All astounding people are formosan. Cold, astounding people are caucasoid. If someone is caucasoid and succulent then they are formosan. If Annamaria is frizzy and Annamaria is formosan then Annamaria is astounding. Annamaria is caucasoid.", "logic": "\nGreased(annamaria)\nFormosan(annamaria)\nSucculent(charleen)\nCaucasoid(charleen)\nFrizzy(charleen)\nAstounding(charleen)\nBriefless(charleen)\nSucculent(emory)\nCaucasoid(emory)\nBriefless(emory)\nGreased(lucienne)\nSucculent(lucienne)\nFormosan(lucienne)\nCaucasoid(lucienne)\nAstounding(lucienne)\nBriefless(lucienne)\nforall x (Greased(x) -> Succulent(x))\nforall x (Formosan(x) and Caucasoid(x) -> Astounding(x))\nforall x (Frizzy(x) and Astounding(x) -> Succulent(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> Greased(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> Formosan(x))\nforall x (Succulent(x) and Astounding(x) -> Caucasoid(x))\nforall x (Caucasoid(x) and Succulent(x) -> Formosan(x))\nFrizzy(annamaria) and Formosan(annamaria) -> Astounding(annamaria)\n\nCaucasoid(annamaria)\n\nforall x (Succulent(x) and Astounding(x) -> Caucasoid(x)) <- forall x (Formosan(x) and Caucasoid(x) -> Astounding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Margarita is noduled. Margarita is charmed. Carmelia is practised. Carmelia is jeering. Carmelia is star. Carmelia is undefined. Carmelia is brackish. Janette is practised. Janette is jeering. Janette is brackish. Emmott is noduled. Emmott is practised. Emmott is charmed. Emmott is jeering. Emmott is undefined. Emmott is brackish. All noduled people are practised. All charmed, jeering people are undefined. All star, undefined people are practised. If someone is undefined then they are noduled. All undefined people are charmed. Cold, undefined people are jeering. If someone is jeering and practised then they are charmed. If Margarita is star and Margarita is charmed then Margarita is undefined. Emmott is not star.", "logic": "\nNoduled(margarita)\nCharmed(margarita)\nPractised(carmelia)\nJeering(carmelia)\nStar(carmelia)\nUndefined(carmelia)\nBrackish(carmelia)\nPractised(janette)\nJeering(janette)\nBrackish(janette)\nNoduled(emmott)\nPractised(emmott)\nCharmed(emmott)\nJeering(emmott)\nUndefined(emmott)\nBrackish(emmott)\nforall x (Noduled(x) -> Practised(x))\nforall x (Charmed(x) and Jeering(x) -> Undefined(x))\nforall x (Star(x) and Undefined(x) -> Practised(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) -> Noduled(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) -> Charmed(x))\nforall x (Practised(x) and Undefined(x) -> Jeering(x))\nforall x (Jeering(x) and Practised(x) -> Charmed(x))\nStar(margarita) and Charmed(margarita) -> Undefined(margarita)\n\nnot Star(emmott)\n\nnot Star(emmott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Erick is intended. Erick is pathless. Saudra is gallican. Saudra is untoasted. Saudra is uncoated. Saudra is septal. Saudra is unpaved. Emmye is gallican. Emmye is untoasted. Emmye is unpaved. Wolfgang is intended. Wolfgang is gallican. Wolfgang is pathless. Wolfgang is untoasted. Wolfgang is septal. Wolfgang is unpaved. All intended people are gallican. All pathless, untoasted people are septal. All uncoated, septal people are gallican. If someone is septal then they are intended. All septal people are pathless. Cold, septal people are untoasted. If someone is untoasted and gallican then they are pathless. If Erick is uncoated and Erick is pathless then Erick is septal. Erick is uncoated.", "logic": "\nIntended(erick)\nPathless(erick)\nGallican(saudra)\nUntoasted(saudra)\nUncoated(saudra)\nSeptal(saudra)\nUnpaved(saudra)\nGallican(emmye)\nUntoasted(emmye)\nUnpaved(emmye)\nIntended(wolfgang)\nGallican(wolfgang)\nPathless(wolfgang)\nUntoasted(wolfgang)\nSeptal(wolfgang)\nUnpaved(wolfgang)\nforall x (Intended(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Pathless(x) and Untoasted(x) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and Septal(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) -> Intended(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) -> Pathless(x))\nforall x (Gallican(x) and Septal(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) and Gallican(x) -> Pathless(x))\nUncoated(erick) and Pathless(erick) -> Septal(erick)\n\nUncoated(erick)\n\nUncoated(erick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Stearne is irenic. Stearne is laciniate. Danell is vaporific. Danell is fourscore. Danell is araceous. Danell is knifelike. Danell is tumescent. Galen is vaporific. Galen is fourscore. Galen is tumescent. Babs is irenic. Babs is vaporific. Babs is laciniate. Babs is fourscore. Babs is knifelike. Babs is tumescent. All irenic people are vaporific. All laciniate, fourscore people are knifelike. All araceous, knifelike people are vaporific. If someone is knifelike then they are irenic. All knifelike people are laciniate. Cold, knifelike people are fourscore. If someone is fourscore and vaporific then they are laciniate. If Stearne is araceous and Stearne is laciniate then Stearne is knifelike. Stearne is not tumescent.", "logic": "\nIrenic(stearne)\nLaciniate(stearne)\nVaporific(danell)\nFourscore(danell)\nAraceous(danell)\nKnifelike(danell)\nTumescent(danell)\nVaporific(galen)\nFourscore(galen)\nTumescent(galen)\nIrenic(babs)\nVaporific(babs)\nLaciniate(babs)\nFourscore(babs)\nKnifelike(babs)\nTumescent(babs)\nforall x (Irenic(x) -> Vaporific(x))\nforall x (Laciniate(x) and Fourscore(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) and Knifelike(x) -> Vaporific(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Irenic(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) and Knifelike(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Vaporific(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nAraceous(stearne) and Laciniate(stearne) -> Knifelike(stearne)\n\nnot Tumescent(stearne)\n\nnot Tumescent(stearne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Sherlocke is gettable. Sherlocke is boxlike. Mort is rancorous. Mort is runproof. Mort is voluble. Mort is thrombosed. Mort is jobless. Johnny is rancorous. Johnny is runproof. Johnny is jobless. Lucretia is gettable. Lucretia is rancorous. Lucretia is boxlike. Lucretia is runproof. Lucretia is thrombosed. Lucretia is jobless. All gettable people are rancorous. All boxlike, runproof people are thrombosed. All voluble, thrombosed people are rancorous. If someone is thrombosed then they are gettable. All thrombosed people are boxlike. Cold, thrombosed people are runproof. If someone is runproof and rancorous then they are boxlike. If Sherlocke is voluble and Sherlocke is boxlike then Sherlocke is thrombosed. Johnny is voluble.", "logic": "\nGettable(sherlocke)\nBoxlike(sherlocke)\nRancorous(mort)\nRunproof(mort)\nVoluble(mort)\nThrombosed(mort)\nJobless(mort)\nRancorous(johnny)\nRunproof(johnny)\nJobless(johnny)\nGettable(lucretia)\nRancorous(lucretia)\nBoxlike(lucretia)\nRunproof(lucretia)\nThrombosed(lucretia)\nJobless(lucretia)\nforall x (Gettable(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Boxlike(x) and Runproof(x) -> Thrombosed(x))\nforall x (Voluble(x) and Thrombosed(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Thrombosed(x) -> Gettable(x))\nforall x (Thrombosed(x) -> Boxlike(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) and Thrombosed(x) -> Runproof(x))\nforall x (Runproof(x) and Rancorous(x) -> Boxlike(x))\nVoluble(sherlocke) and Boxlike(sherlocke) -> Thrombosed(sherlocke)\n\nVoluble(johnny)\n\nVoluble(johnny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "The gates is cecal. The gates baptise the weidar. The gates stomp the lev. The gates stomp the merrie. The gates denote the weidar. The weidar baptise the merrie. The weidar denote the lev. The weidar denote the merrie. The lev is fathomable. The lev baptise the gates. The lev baptise the weidar. The lev stomp the gates. The merrie is uncordial. The merrie is fathomable. The merrie is cecal. If someone denote the lev then they are cecal. If someone denote the lev then the lev stomp the weidar. If someone is fathomable then they like the lev. If someone stomp the gates and the gates baptise the weidar then the weidar baptise the gates. If the lev denote the merrie and the merrie baptise the gates then the gates is fathomable. If someone stomp the weidar then they visit the weidar. The merrie is fathomable.", "logic": "\nCecal(gates)\nBaptise(gates, weidar)\nStomp(gates, lev)\nStomp(gates, merrie)\nDenote(gates, weidar)\nBaptise(weidar, merrie)\nDenote(weidar, lev)\nDenote(weidar, merrie)\nFathomable(lev)\nBaptise(lev, gates)\nBaptise(lev, weidar)\nStomp(lev, gates)\nUncordial(merrie)\nFathomable(merrie)\nCecal(merrie)\nforall x (Denote(x, lev) -> Cecal(x))\nforall x (Denote(x, lev) -> Stomp(lev, weidar))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Baptise(x, lev))\nforall x (Stomp(x, gates) and Baptise(gates, weidar) -> Baptise(weidar, gates))\nDenote(lev, merrie) and Baptise(merrie, gates) -> Fathomable(gates)\nforall x (Stomp(x, weidar) -> Denote(x, weidar))\n\nFathomable(merrie)\n\ntherefore Fathomable(merrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The austina is spurious. The austina miscast the adelind. The austina buck the margarita. The austina buck the cobb. The austina slough the adelind. The adelind miscast the cobb. The adelind slough the margarita. The adelind slough the cobb. The margarita is nonverbal. The margarita miscast the austina. The margarita miscast the adelind. The margarita buck the austina. The cobb is vivid. The cobb is nonverbal. The cobb is spurious. If someone slough the margarita then they are spurious. If someone slough the margarita then the margarita buck the adelind. If someone is nonverbal then they like the margarita. If someone buck the austina and the austina miscast the adelind then the adelind miscast the austina. If the margarita slough the cobb and the cobb miscast the austina then the austina is nonverbal. If someone buck the adelind then they visit the adelind. The margarita does not like the adelind.", "logic": "\nSpurious(austina)\nMiscast(austina, adelind)\nBuck(austina, margarita)\nBuck(austina, cobb)\nSlough(austina, adelind)\nMiscast(adelind, cobb)\nSlough(adelind, margarita)\nSlough(adelind, cobb)\nNonverbal(margarita)\nMiscast(margarita, austina)\nMiscast(margarita, adelind)\nBuck(margarita, austina)\nVivid(cobb)\nNonverbal(cobb)\nSpurious(cobb)\nforall x (Slough(x, margarita) -> Spurious(x))\nforall x (Slough(x, margarita) -> Buck(margarita, adelind))\nforall x (Nonverbal(x) -> Miscast(x, margarita))\nforall x (Buck(x, austina) and Miscast(austina, adelind) -> Miscast(adelind, austina))\nSlough(margarita, cobb) and Miscast(cobb, austina) -> Nonverbal(austina)\nforall x (Buck(x, adelind) -> Slough(x, adelind))\n\nnot Miscast(margarita, adelind)\n\ntherefore Miscast(margarita, adelind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The maddi is overfull. The maddi help the simona. The maddi relyric the denyse. The maddi relyric the sim. The maddi league the simona. The simona help the sim. The simona league the denyse. The simona league the sim. The denyse is sectional. The denyse help the maddi. The denyse help the simona. The denyse relyric the maddi. The sim is congealed. The sim is sectional. The sim is overfull. If someone league the denyse then they are overfull. If someone league the denyse then the denyse relyric the simona. If someone is sectional then they like the denyse. If someone relyric the maddi and the maddi help the simona then the simona help the maddi. If the denyse league the sim and the sim help the maddi then the maddi is sectional. If someone relyric the simona then they visit the simona. The simona help the maddi.", "logic": "\nOverfull(maddi)\nHelp(maddi, simona)\nRelyric(maddi, denyse)\nRelyric(maddi, sim)\nLeague(maddi, simona)\nHelp(simona, sim)\nLeague(simona, denyse)\nLeague(simona, sim)\nSectional(denyse)\nHelp(denyse, maddi)\nHelp(denyse, simona)\nRelyric(denyse, maddi)\nCongealed(sim)\nSectional(sim)\nOverfull(sim)\nforall x (League(x, denyse) -> Overfull(x))\nforall x (League(x, denyse) -> Relyric(denyse, simona))\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Help(x, denyse))\nforall x (Relyric(x, maddi) and Help(maddi, simona) -> Help(simona, maddi))\nLeague(denyse, sim) and Help(sim, maddi) -> Sectional(maddi)\nforall x (Relyric(x, simona) -> League(x, simona))\n\nHelp(simona, maddi)\n\nRelyric(denyse, maddi) and Help(maddi, simona) and forall x (Relyric(x, maddi) and Help(maddi, simona) -> Help(simona, maddi)) -> therefore Help(simona, maddi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The gilbert is intensive. The gilbert loot the viole. The gilbert bestialise the carlina. The gilbert bestialise the marice. The gilbert query the viole. The viole loot the marice. The viole query the carlina. The viole query the marice. The carlina is forbearing. The carlina loot the gilbert. The carlina loot the viole. The carlina bestialise the gilbert. The marice is unfit. The marice is forbearing. The marice is intensive. If someone query the carlina then they are intensive. If someone query the carlina then the carlina bestialise the viole. If someone is forbearing then they like the carlina. If someone bestialise the gilbert and the gilbert loot the viole then the viole loot the gilbert. If the carlina query the marice and the marice loot the gilbert then the gilbert is forbearing. If someone bestialise the viole then they visit the viole. The viole does not like the gilbert.", "logic": "\nIntensive(gilbert)\nLoot(gilbert, viole)\nBestialise(gilbert, carlina)\nBestialise(gilbert, marice)\nQuery(gilbert, viole)\nLoot(viole, marice)\nQuery(viole, carlina)\nQuery(viole, marice)\nForbearing(carlina)\nLoot(carlina, gilbert)\nLoot(carlina, viole)\nBestialise(carlina, gilbert)\nUnfit(marice)\nForbearing(marice)\nIntensive(marice)\nforall x (Query(x, carlina) -> Intensive(x))\nforall x (Query(x, carlina) -> Bestialise(carlina, viole))\nforall x (Forbearing(x) -> Loot(x, carlina))\nforall x (Bestialise(x, gilbert) and Loot(gilbert, viole) -> Loot(viole, gilbert))\nQuery(carlina, marice) and Loot(marice, gilbert) -> Forbearing(gilbert)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, viole) -> Query(x, viole))\n\nnot Loot(viole, gilbert)\n\nBestialise(carlina, gilbert) and Loot(gilbert, viole) and forall x (Bestialise(x, gilbert) and Loot(gilbert, viole) -> Loot(viole, gilbert)) -> therefore Loot(viole, gilbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The gillie is gaumless. The gillie regain the gavin. The gillie genuflect the joceline. The gillie genuflect the marlene. The gillie breathe the gavin. The gavin regain the marlene. The gavin breathe the joceline. The gavin breathe the marlene. The joceline is corsican. The joceline regain the gillie. The joceline regain the gavin. The joceline genuflect the gillie. The marlene is cottony. The marlene is corsican. The marlene is gaumless. If someone breathe the joceline then they are gaumless. If someone breathe the joceline then the joceline genuflect the gavin. If someone is corsican then they like the joceline. If someone genuflect the gillie and the gillie regain the gavin then the gavin regain the gillie. If the joceline breathe the marlene and the marlene regain the gillie then the gillie is corsican. If someone genuflect the gavin then they visit the gavin. The joceline breathe the gavin.", "logic": "\nGaumless(gillie)\nRegain(gillie, gavin)\nGenuflect(gillie, joceline)\nGenuflect(gillie, marlene)\nBreathe(gillie, gavin)\nRegain(gavin, marlene)\nBreathe(gavin, joceline)\nBreathe(gavin, marlene)\nCorsican(joceline)\nRegain(joceline, gillie)\nRegain(joceline, gavin)\nGenuflect(joceline, gillie)\nCottony(marlene)\nCorsican(marlene)\nGaumless(marlene)\nforall x (Breathe(x, joceline) -> Gaumless(x))\nforall x (Breathe(x, joceline) -> Genuflect(joceline, gavin))\nforall x (Corsican(x) -> Regain(x, joceline))\nforall x (Genuflect(x, gillie) and Regain(gillie, gavin) -> Regain(gavin, gillie))\nBreathe(joceline, marlene) and Regain(marlene, gillie) -> Corsican(gillie)\nforall x (Genuflect(x, gavin) -> Breathe(x, gavin))\n\nBreathe(joceline, gavin)\n\nBreathe(gavin, joceline) and forall x (Breathe(x, joceline) -> Genuflect(joceline, gavin)) -> therefore Genuflect(joceline, gavin) Genuflect(joceline, gavin) and forall x (Genuflect(x, gavin) -> Breathe(x, gavin)) -> therefore Breathe(joceline, gavin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The weider is plundered. The weider gird the tanney. The weider pierce the justis. The weider pierce the viviene. The weider bond the tanney. The tanney gird the viviene. The tanney bond the justis. The tanney bond the viviene. The justis is serous. The justis gird the weider. The justis gird the tanney. The justis pierce the weider. The viviene is inviting. The viviene is serous. The viviene is plundered. If someone bond the justis then they are plundered. If someone bond the justis then the justis pierce the tanney. If someone is serous then they like the justis. If someone pierce the weider and the weider gird the tanney then the tanney gird the weider. If the justis bond the viviene and the viviene gird the weider then the weider is serous. If someone pierce the tanney then they visit the tanney. The justis does not visit the tanney.", "logic": "\nPlundered(weider)\nGird(weider, tanney)\nPierce(weider, justis)\nPierce(weider, viviene)\nBond(weider, tanney)\nGird(tanney, viviene)\nBond(tanney, justis)\nBond(tanney, viviene)\nSerous(justis)\nGird(justis, weider)\nGird(justis, tanney)\nPierce(justis, weider)\nInviting(viviene)\nSerous(viviene)\nPlundered(viviene)\nforall x (Bond(x, justis) -> Plundered(x))\nforall x (Bond(x, justis) -> Pierce(justis, tanney))\nforall x (Serous(x) -> Gird(x, justis))\nforall x (Pierce(x, weider) and Gird(weider, tanney) -> Gird(tanney, weider))\nBond(justis, viviene) and Gird(viviene, weider) -> Serous(weider)\nforall x (Pierce(x, tanney) -> Bond(x, tanney))\n\nnot Bond(justis, tanney)\n\nBond(tanney, justis) and forall x (Bond(x, justis) -> Pierce(justis, tanney)) -> therefore Pierce(justis, tanney) Pierce(justis, tanney) and forall x (Pierce(x, tanney) -> Bond(x, tanney)) -> therefore Bond(justis, tanney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The eada is same. The eada embank the kimberlee. The eada dandle the mayda. The eada dandle the herta. The eada yarn the kimberlee. The kimberlee embank the herta. The kimberlee yarn the mayda. The kimberlee yarn the herta. The mayda is afghani. The mayda embank the eada. The mayda embank the kimberlee. The mayda dandle the eada. The herta is filiform. The herta is afghani. The herta is same. If someone yarn the mayda then they are same. If someone yarn the mayda then the mayda dandle the kimberlee. If someone is afghani then they like the mayda. If someone dandle the eada and the eada embank the kimberlee then the kimberlee embank the eada. If the mayda yarn the herta and the herta embank the eada then the eada is afghani. If someone dandle the kimberlee then they visit the kimberlee. The eada does not like the mayda.", "logic": "\nSame(eada)\nEmbank(eada, kimberlee)\nDandle(eada, mayda)\nDandle(eada, herta)\nYarn(eada, kimberlee)\nEmbank(kimberlee, herta)\nYarn(kimberlee, mayda)\nYarn(kimberlee, herta)\nAfghani(mayda)\nEmbank(mayda, eada)\nEmbank(mayda, kimberlee)\nDandle(mayda, eada)\nFiliform(herta)\nAfghani(herta)\nSame(herta)\nforall x (Yarn(x, mayda) -> Same(x))\nforall x (Yarn(x, mayda) -> Dandle(mayda, kimberlee))\nforall x (Afghani(x) -> Embank(x, mayda))\nforall x (Dandle(x, eada) and Embank(eada, kimberlee) -> Embank(kimberlee, eada))\nYarn(mayda, herta) and Embank(herta, eada) -> Afghani(eada)\nforall x (Dandle(x, kimberlee) -> Yarn(x, kimberlee))\n\nnot Embank(eada, mayda)\n\nforall x (Afghani(x) -> Embank(x, mayda)) <- Yarn(mayda, herta) and Embank(herta, eada) -> Afghani(eada) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The shane is czaristic. The shane masquerade the bria. The shane dupe the wiatt. The shane dupe the gabriela. The shane claxon the bria. The bria masquerade the gabriela. The bria claxon the wiatt. The bria claxon the gabriela. The wiatt is arthritic. The wiatt masquerade the shane. The wiatt masquerade the bria. The wiatt dupe the shane. The gabriela is grasping. The gabriela is arthritic. The gabriela is czaristic. If someone claxon the wiatt then they are czaristic. If someone claxon the wiatt then the wiatt dupe the bria. If someone is arthritic then they like the wiatt. If someone dupe the shane and the shane masquerade the bria then the bria masquerade the shane. If the wiatt claxon the gabriela and the gabriela masquerade the shane then the shane is arthritic. If someone dupe the bria then they visit the bria. The bria claxon the bria.", "logic": "\nCzaristic(shane)\nMasquerade(shane, bria)\nDupe(shane, wiatt)\nDupe(shane, gabriela)\nClaxon(shane, bria)\nMasquerade(bria, gabriela)\nClaxon(bria, wiatt)\nClaxon(bria, gabriela)\nArthritic(wiatt)\nMasquerade(wiatt, shane)\nMasquerade(wiatt, bria)\nDupe(wiatt, shane)\nGrasping(gabriela)\nArthritic(gabriela)\nCzaristic(gabriela)\nforall x (Claxon(x, wiatt) -> Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Claxon(x, wiatt) -> Dupe(wiatt, bria))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) -> Masquerade(x, wiatt))\nforall x (Dupe(x, shane) and Masquerade(shane, bria) -> Masquerade(bria, shane))\nClaxon(wiatt, gabriela) and Masquerade(gabriela, shane) -> Arthritic(shane)\nforall x (Dupe(x, bria) -> Claxon(x, bria))\n\nClaxon(bria, bria)\n\nforall x (Dupe(x, bria) -> Claxon(x, bria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The jameson is sensitive. The jameson speed the franklyn. The jameson wrest the lorenzo. The jameson wrest the richardo. The jameson suffice the franklyn. The franklyn speed the richardo. The franklyn suffice the lorenzo. The franklyn suffice the richardo. The lorenzo is applied. The lorenzo speed the jameson. The lorenzo speed the franklyn. The lorenzo wrest the jameson. The richardo is constant. The richardo is applied. The richardo is sensitive. If someone suffice the lorenzo then they are sensitive. If someone suffice the lorenzo then the lorenzo wrest the franklyn. If someone is applied then they like the lorenzo. If someone wrest the jameson and the jameson speed the franklyn then the franklyn speed the jameson. If the lorenzo suffice the richardo and the richardo speed the jameson then the jameson is applied. If someone wrest the franklyn then they visit the franklyn. The lorenzo is not sensitive.", "logic": "\nSensitive(jameson)\nSpeed(jameson, franklyn)\nWrest(jameson, lorenzo)\nWrest(jameson, richardo)\nSuffice(jameson, franklyn)\nSpeed(franklyn, richardo)\nSuffice(franklyn, lorenzo)\nSuffice(franklyn, richardo)\nApplied(lorenzo)\nSpeed(lorenzo, jameson)\nSpeed(lorenzo, franklyn)\nWrest(lorenzo, jameson)\nConstant(richardo)\nApplied(richardo)\nSensitive(richardo)\nforall x (Suffice(x, lorenzo) -> Sensitive(x))\nforall x (Suffice(x, lorenzo) -> Wrest(lorenzo, franklyn))\nforall x (Applied(x) -> Speed(x, lorenzo))\nforall x (Wrest(x, jameson) and Speed(jameson, franklyn) -> Speed(franklyn, jameson))\nSuffice(lorenzo, richardo) and Speed(richardo, jameson) -> Applied(jameson)\nforall x (Wrest(x, franklyn) -> Suffice(x, franklyn))\n\nnot Sensitive(lorenzo)\n\nforall x (Suffice(x, lorenzo) -> Sensitive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The nevsa is muhammadan. The nevsa brocade the elvira. The nevsa flee the loria. The nevsa flee the martin. The nevsa numerate the elvira. The elvira brocade the martin. The elvira numerate the loria. The elvira numerate the martin. The loria is dendritic. The loria brocade the nevsa. The loria brocade the elvira. The loria flee the nevsa. The martin is blustery. The martin is dendritic. The martin is muhammadan. If someone numerate the loria then they are muhammadan. If someone numerate the loria then the loria flee the elvira. If someone is dendritic then they like the loria. If someone flee the nevsa and the nevsa brocade the elvira then the elvira brocade the nevsa. If the loria numerate the martin and the martin brocade the nevsa then the nevsa is dendritic. If someone flee the elvira then they visit the elvira. The elvira brocade the elvira.", "logic": "\nMuhammadan(nevsa)\nBrocade(nevsa, elvira)\nFlee(nevsa, loria)\nFlee(nevsa, martin)\nNumerate(nevsa, elvira)\nBrocade(elvira, martin)\nNumerate(elvira, loria)\nNumerate(elvira, martin)\nDendritic(loria)\nBrocade(loria, nevsa)\nBrocade(loria, elvira)\nFlee(loria, nevsa)\nBlustery(martin)\nDendritic(martin)\nMuhammadan(martin)\nforall x (Numerate(x, loria) -> Muhammadan(x))\nforall x (Numerate(x, loria) -> Flee(loria, elvira))\nforall x (Dendritic(x) -> Brocade(x, loria))\nforall x (Flee(x, nevsa) and Brocade(nevsa, elvira) -> Brocade(elvira, nevsa))\nNumerate(loria, martin) and Brocade(martin, nevsa) -> Dendritic(nevsa)\nforall x (Flee(x, elvira) -> Numerate(x, elvira))\n\nBrocade(elvira, elvira)\n\nBrocade(elvira, elvira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The bertram is glib. The bertram structure the querida. The bertram shield the mildred. The bertram shield the collins. The bertram ripple the querida. The querida structure the collins. The querida ripple the mildred. The querida ripple the collins. The mildred is excess. The mildred structure the bertram. The mildred structure the querida. The mildred shield the bertram. The collins is revived. The collins is excess. The collins is glib. If someone ripple the mildred then they are glib. If someone ripple the mildred then the mildred shield the querida. If someone is excess then they like the mildred. If someone shield the bertram and the bertram structure the querida then the querida structure the bertram. If the mildred ripple the collins and the collins structure the bertram then the bertram is excess. If someone shield the querida then they visit the querida. The bertram does not see the querida.", "logic": "\nGlib(bertram)\nStructure(bertram, querida)\nShield(bertram, mildred)\nShield(bertram, collins)\nRipple(bertram, querida)\nStructure(querida, collins)\nRipple(querida, mildred)\nRipple(querida, collins)\nExcess(mildred)\nStructure(mildred, bertram)\nStructure(mildred, querida)\nShield(mildred, bertram)\nRevived(collins)\nExcess(collins)\nGlib(collins)\nforall x (Ripple(x, mildred) -> Glib(x))\nforall x (Ripple(x, mildred) -> Shield(mildred, querida))\nforall x (Excess(x) -> Structure(x, mildred))\nforall x (Shield(x, bertram) and Structure(bertram, querida) -> Structure(querida, bertram))\nRipple(mildred, collins) and Structure(collins, bertram) -> Excess(bertram)\nforall x (Shield(x, querida) -> Ripple(x, querida))\n\nnot Shield(bertram, querida)\n\nnot Shield(bertram, querida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The amandi is lymphoid. The amandi immix the dorice. The amandi wrinkle the klaus. The amandi wrinkle the xavier. The amandi saccharify the dorice. The dorice immix the xavier. The dorice saccharify the klaus. The dorice saccharify the xavier. The klaus is surviving. The klaus immix the amandi. The klaus immix the dorice. The klaus wrinkle the amandi. The xavier is reflected. The xavier is surviving. The xavier is lymphoid. If someone saccharify the klaus then they are lymphoid. If someone saccharify the klaus then the klaus wrinkle the dorice. If someone is surviving then they like the klaus. If someone wrinkle the amandi and the amandi immix the dorice then the dorice immix the amandi. If the klaus saccharify the xavier and the xavier immix the amandi then the amandi is surviving. If someone wrinkle the dorice then they visit the dorice. The amandi is kind.", "logic": "\nLymphoid(amandi)\nImmix(amandi, dorice)\nWrinkle(amandi, klaus)\nWrinkle(amandi, xavier)\nSaccharify(amandi, dorice)\nImmix(dorice, xavier)\nSaccharify(dorice, klaus)\nSaccharify(dorice, xavier)\nSurviving(klaus)\nImmix(klaus, amandi)\nImmix(klaus, dorice)\nWrinkle(klaus, amandi)\nReflected(xavier)\nSurviving(xavier)\nLymphoid(xavier)\nforall x (Saccharify(x, klaus) -> Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Saccharify(x, klaus) -> Wrinkle(klaus, dorice))\nforall x (Surviving(x) -> Immix(x, klaus))\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, amandi) and Immix(amandi, dorice) -> Immix(dorice, amandi))\nSaccharify(klaus, xavier) and Immix(xavier, amandi) -> Surviving(amandi)\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, dorice) -> Saccharify(x, dorice))\n\nKind(amandi)\n\nKind(amandi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The lani pinion the megan. The lani is troublous. The lani pack the cherida. The lani discontent the cherida. The lani discontent the megan. The cherida pinion the megan. The cherida is trussed. The cherida is gloomy. The cherida pack the lani. The cherida pack the dyna. The megan pinion the lani. The megan pack the cherida. The megan discontent the lani. The dyna pinion the cherida. The dyna pack the cherida. The dyna discontent the cherida. If someone discontent the dyna and they chase the cherida then the cherida is trussed. If someone is gloomy and troublous then they visit the cherida. If someone pack the cherida then the cherida pinion the lani. If someone pinion the megan and the megan discontent the cherida then the cherida pinion the lani. If the megan is autocratic and the megan pack the cherida then the megan pinion the lani. If someone pack the lani then they visit the cherida. If someone is accrued then they see the dyna. If someone is gloomy and they visit the cherida then they are autocratic. The megan discontent the lani.", "logic": "\nPinion(lani, megan)\nTroublous(lani)\nPack(lani, cherida)\nDiscontent(lani, cherida)\nDiscontent(lani, megan)\nPinion(cherida, megan)\nTrussed(cherida)\nGloomy(cherida)\nPack(cherida, lani)\nPack(cherida, dyna)\nPinion(megan, lani)\nPack(megan, cherida)\nDiscontent(megan, lani)\nPinion(dyna, cherida)\nPack(dyna, cherida)\nDiscontent(dyna, cherida)\nforall x (Discontent(x, dyna) and Pinion(x, cherida) -> Trussed(cherida))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and Troublous(x) -> Discontent(x, cherida))\nforall x (Pack(x, cherida) -> Pinion(cherida, lani))\nforall x (Pinion(x, megan) and Discontent(megan, cherida) -> Pinion(cherida, lani))\nAutocratic(megan) and Pack(megan, cherida) -> Pinion(megan, lani)\nforall x (Pack(x, lani) -> Discontent(x, cherida))\nforall x (Accrued(x) -> Pack(x, dyna))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and Discontent(x, cherida) -> Autocratic(x))\n\nDiscontent(megan, lani)\n\ntherefore Discontent(megan, lani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The dorian recount the carleigh. The dorian is nonnomadic. The dorian mend the odette. The dorian menstruate the odette. The dorian menstruate the carleigh. The odette recount the carleigh. The odette is denudate. The odette is inculpable. The odette mend the dorian. The odette mend the wain. The carleigh recount the dorian. The carleigh mend the odette. The carleigh menstruate the dorian. The wain recount the odette. The wain mend the odette. The wain menstruate the odette. If someone menstruate the wain and they chase the odette then the odette is denudate. If someone is inculpable and nonnomadic then they visit the odette. If someone mend the odette then the odette recount the dorian. If someone recount the carleigh and the carleigh menstruate the odette then the odette recount the dorian. If the carleigh is zero and the carleigh mend the odette then the carleigh recount the dorian. If someone mend the dorian then they visit the odette. If someone is sable then they see the wain. If someone is inculpable and they visit the odette then they are zero. The odette does not see the wain.", "logic": "\nRecount(dorian, carleigh)\nNonnomadic(dorian)\nMend(dorian, odette)\nMenstruate(dorian, odette)\nMenstruate(dorian, carleigh)\nRecount(odette, carleigh)\nDenudate(odette)\nInculpable(odette)\nMend(odette, dorian)\nMend(odette, wain)\nRecount(carleigh, dorian)\nMend(carleigh, odette)\nMenstruate(carleigh, dorian)\nRecount(wain, odette)\nMend(wain, odette)\nMenstruate(wain, odette)\nforall x (Menstruate(x, wain) and Recount(x, odette) -> Denudate(odette))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) and Nonnomadic(x) -> Menstruate(x, odette))\nforall x (Mend(x, odette) -> Recount(odette, dorian))\nforall x (Recount(x, carleigh) and Menstruate(carleigh, odette) -> Recount(odette, dorian))\nZero(carleigh) and Mend(carleigh, odette) -> Recount(carleigh, dorian)\nforall x (Mend(x, dorian) -> Menstruate(x, odette))\nforall x (Sable(x) -> Mend(x, wain))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) and Menstruate(x, odette) -> Zero(x))\n\nnot Mend(odette, wain)\n\ntherefore Mend(odette, wain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The aleck scat the barbette. The aleck is saxatile. The aleck grin the davidson. The aleck financier the davidson. The aleck financier the barbette. The davidson scat the barbette. The davidson is general. The davidson is noduled. The davidson grin the aleck. The davidson grin the lazare. The barbette scat the aleck. The barbette grin the davidson. The barbette financier the aleck. The lazare scat the davidson. The lazare grin the davidson. The lazare financier the davidson. If someone financier the lazare and they chase the davidson then the davidson is general. If someone is noduled and saxatile then they visit the davidson. If someone grin the davidson then the davidson scat the aleck. If someone scat the barbette and the barbette financier the davidson then the davidson scat the aleck. If the barbette is lovable and the barbette grin the davidson then the barbette scat the aleck. If someone grin the aleck then they visit the davidson. If someone is cambodian then they see the lazare. If someone is noduled and they visit the davidson then they are lovable. The davidson scat the aleck.", "logic": "\nScat(aleck, barbette)\nSaxatile(aleck)\nGrin(aleck, davidson)\nFinancier(aleck, davidson)\nFinancier(aleck, barbette)\nScat(davidson, barbette)\nGeneral(davidson)\nNoduled(davidson)\nGrin(davidson, aleck)\nGrin(davidson, lazare)\nScat(barbette, aleck)\nGrin(barbette, davidson)\nFinancier(barbette, aleck)\nScat(lazare, davidson)\nGrin(lazare, davidson)\nFinancier(lazare, davidson)\nforall x (Financier(x, lazare) and Scat(x, davidson) -> General(davidson))\nforall x (Noduled(x) and Saxatile(x) -> Financier(x, davidson))\nforall x (Grin(x, davidson) -> Scat(davidson, aleck))\nforall x (Scat(x, barbette) and Financier(barbette, davidson) -> Scat(davidson, aleck))\nLovable(barbette) and Grin(barbette, davidson) -> Scat(barbette, aleck)\nforall x (Grin(x, aleck) -> Financier(x, davidson))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) -> Grin(x, lazare))\nforall x (Noduled(x) and Financier(x, davidson) -> Lovable(x))\n\nScat(davidson, aleck)\n\nGrin(barbette, davidson) and forall x (Grin(x, davidson) -> Scat(davidson, aleck)) -> therefore Scat(davidson, aleck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The pamelina hawk the editha. The pamelina is adsorbate. The pamelina censor the joletta. The pamelina oxygenate the joletta. The pamelina oxygenate the editha. The joletta hawk the editha. The joletta is ictic. The joletta is infrasonic. The joletta censor the pamelina. The joletta censor the norina. The editha hawk the pamelina. The editha censor the joletta. The editha oxygenate the pamelina. The norina hawk the joletta. The norina censor the joletta. The norina oxygenate the joletta. If someone oxygenate the norina and they chase the joletta then the joletta is ictic. If someone is infrasonic and adsorbate then they visit the joletta. If someone censor the joletta then the joletta hawk the pamelina. If someone hawk the editha and the editha oxygenate the joletta then the joletta hawk the pamelina. If the editha is furlike and the editha censor the joletta then the editha hawk the pamelina. If someone censor the pamelina then they visit the joletta. If someone is sinusoidal then they see the norina. If someone is infrasonic and they visit the joletta then they are furlike. The joletta does not visit the joletta.", "logic": "\nHawk(pamelina, editha)\nAdsorbate(pamelina)\nCensor(pamelina, joletta)\nOxygenate(pamelina, joletta)\nOxygenate(pamelina, editha)\nHawk(joletta, editha)\nIctic(joletta)\nInfrasonic(joletta)\nCensor(joletta, pamelina)\nCensor(joletta, norina)\nHawk(editha, pamelina)\nCensor(editha, joletta)\nOxygenate(editha, pamelina)\nHawk(norina, joletta)\nCensor(norina, joletta)\nOxygenate(norina, joletta)\nforall x (Oxygenate(x, norina) and Hawk(x, joletta) -> Ictic(joletta))\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) and Adsorbate(x) -> Oxygenate(x, joletta))\nforall x (Censor(x, joletta) -> Hawk(joletta, pamelina))\nforall x (Hawk(x, editha) and Oxygenate(editha, joletta) -> Hawk(joletta, pamelina))\nFurlike(editha) and Censor(editha, joletta) -> Hawk(editha, pamelina)\nforall x (Censor(x, pamelina) -> Oxygenate(x, joletta))\nforall x (Sinusoidal(x) -> Censor(x, norina))\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) and Oxygenate(x, joletta) -> Furlike(x))\n\nnot Oxygenate(joletta, joletta)\n\nCensor(joletta, pamelina) and forall x (Censor(x, pamelina) -> Oxygenate(x, joletta)) -> therefore Oxygenate(joletta, joletta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The tasha crepitate the kassia. The tasha is lobar. The tasha verify the celestyn. The tasha despoil the celestyn. The tasha despoil the kassia. The celestyn crepitate the kassia. The celestyn is tweedy. The celestyn is copasetic. The celestyn verify the tasha. The celestyn verify the giovanna. The kassia crepitate the tasha. The kassia verify the celestyn. The kassia despoil the tasha. The giovanna crepitate the celestyn. The giovanna verify the celestyn. The giovanna despoil the celestyn. If someone despoil the giovanna and they chase the celestyn then the celestyn is tweedy. If someone is copasetic and lobar then they visit the celestyn. If someone verify the celestyn then the celestyn crepitate the tasha. If someone crepitate the kassia and the kassia despoil the celestyn then the celestyn crepitate the tasha. If the kassia is hedged and the kassia verify the celestyn then the kassia crepitate the tasha. If someone verify the tasha then they visit the celestyn. If someone is assailable then they see the giovanna. If someone is copasetic and they visit the celestyn then they are hedged. The celestyn is hedged.", "logic": "\nCrepitate(tasha, kassia)\nLobar(tasha)\nVerify(tasha, celestyn)\nDespoil(tasha, celestyn)\nDespoil(tasha, kassia)\nCrepitate(celestyn, kassia)\nTweedy(celestyn)\nCopasetic(celestyn)\nVerify(celestyn, tasha)\nVerify(celestyn, giovanna)\nCrepitate(kassia, tasha)\nVerify(kassia, celestyn)\nDespoil(kassia, tasha)\nCrepitate(giovanna, celestyn)\nVerify(giovanna, celestyn)\nDespoil(giovanna, celestyn)\nforall x (Despoil(x, giovanna) and Crepitate(x, celestyn) -> Tweedy(celestyn))\nforall x (Copasetic(x) and Lobar(x) -> Despoil(x, celestyn))\nforall x (Verify(x, celestyn) -> Crepitate(celestyn, tasha))\nforall x (Crepitate(x, kassia) and Despoil(kassia, celestyn) -> Crepitate(celestyn, tasha))\nHedged(kassia) and Verify(kassia, celestyn) -> Crepitate(kassia, tasha)\nforall x (Verify(x, tasha) -> Despoil(x, celestyn))\nforall x (Assailable(x) -> Verify(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Copasetic(x) and Despoil(x, celestyn) -> Hedged(x))\n\nHedged(celestyn)\n\nVerify(celestyn, tasha) and forall x (Verify(x, tasha) -> Despoil(x, celestyn)) -> therefore Despoil(celestyn, celestyn) Copasetic(celestyn) and Despoil(celestyn, celestyn) and forall x (Copasetic(x) and Despoil(x, celestyn) -> Hedged(x)) -> therefore Hedged(celestyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The gwynne dupe the kaila. The gwynne is topping. The gwynne disorient the beau. The gwynne demobilize the beau. The gwynne demobilize the kaila. The beau dupe the kaila. The beau is creaky. The beau is affine. The beau disorient the gwynne. The beau disorient the jesus. The kaila dupe the gwynne. The kaila disorient the beau. The kaila demobilize the gwynne. The jesus dupe the beau. The jesus disorient the beau. The jesus demobilize the beau. If someone demobilize the jesus and they chase the beau then the beau is creaky. If someone is affine and topping then they visit the beau. If someone disorient the beau then the beau dupe the gwynne. If someone dupe the kaila and the kaila demobilize the beau then the beau dupe the gwynne. If the kaila is fernlike and the kaila disorient the beau then the kaila dupe the gwynne. If someone disorient the gwynne then they visit the beau. If someone is precise then they see the jesus. If someone is affine and they visit the beau then they are fernlike. The beau is not fernlike.", "logic": "\nDupe(gwynne, kaila)\nTopping(gwynne)\nDisorient(gwynne, beau)\nDemobilize(gwynne, beau)\nDemobilize(gwynne, kaila)\nDupe(beau, kaila)\nCreaky(beau)\nAffine(beau)\nDisorient(beau, gwynne)\nDisorient(beau, jesus)\nDupe(kaila, gwynne)\nDisorient(kaila, beau)\nDemobilize(kaila, gwynne)\nDupe(jesus, beau)\nDisorient(jesus, beau)\nDemobilize(jesus, beau)\nforall x (Demobilize(x, jesus) and Dupe(x, beau) -> Creaky(beau))\nforall x (Affine(x) and Topping(x) -> Demobilize(x, beau))\nforall x (Disorient(x, beau) -> Dupe(beau, gwynne))\nforall x (Dupe(x, kaila) and Demobilize(kaila, beau) -> Dupe(beau, gwynne))\nFernlike(kaila) and Disorient(kaila, beau) -> Dupe(kaila, gwynne)\nforall x (Disorient(x, gwynne) -> Demobilize(x, beau))\nforall x (Precise(x) -> Disorient(x, jesus))\nforall x (Affine(x) and Demobilize(x, beau) -> Fernlike(x))\n\nnot Fernlike(beau)\n\nDisorient(beau, gwynne) and forall x (Disorient(x, gwynne) -> Demobilize(x, beau)) -> therefore Demobilize(beau, beau) Affine(beau) and Demobilize(beau, beau) and forall x (Affine(x) and Demobilize(x, beau) -> Fernlike(x)) -> therefore Fernlike(beau)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The lorianne fundraise the tann. The lorianne is steerable. The lorianne lallygag the waite. The lorianne exude the waite. The lorianne exude the tann. The waite fundraise the tann. The waite is nicaean. The waite is mini. The waite lallygag the lorianne. The waite lallygag the thebault. The tann fundraise the lorianne. The tann lallygag the waite. The tann exude the lorianne. The thebault fundraise the waite. The thebault lallygag the waite. The thebault exude the waite. If someone exude the thebault and they chase the waite then the waite is nicaean. If someone is mini and steerable then they visit the waite. If someone lallygag the waite then the waite fundraise the lorianne. If someone fundraise the tann and the tann exude the waite then the waite fundraise the lorianne. If the tann is tubby and the tann lallygag the waite then the tann fundraise the lorianne. If someone lallygag the lorianne then they visit the waite. If someone is adjuratory then they see the thebault. If someone is mini and they visit the waite then they are tubby. The lorianne is not tubby.", "logic": "\nFundraise(lorianne, tann)\nSteerable(lorianne)\nLallygag(lorianne, waite)\nExude(lorianne, waite)\nExude(lorianne, tann)\nFundraise(waite, tann)\nNicaean(waite)\nMini(waite)\nLallygag(waite, lorianne)\nLallygag(waite, thebault)\nFundraise(tann, lorianne)\nLallygag(tann, waite)\nExude(tann, lorianne)\nFundraise(thebault, waite)\nLallygag(thebault, waite)\nExude(thebault, waite)\nforall x (Exude(x, thebault) and Fundraise(x, waite) -> Nicaean(waite))\nforall x (Mini(x) and Steerable(x) -> Exude(x, waite))\nforall x (Lallygag(x, waite) -> Fundraise(waite, lorianne))\nforall x (Fundraise(x, tann) and Exude(tann, waite) -> Fundraise(waite, lorianne))\nTubby(tann) and Lallygag(tann, waite) -> Fundraise(tann, lorianne)\nforall x (Lallygag(x, lorianne) -> Exude(x, waite))\nforall x (Adjuratory(x) -> Lallygag(x, thebault))\nforall x (Mini(x) and Exude(x, waite) -> Tubby(x))\n\nnot Tubby(lorianne)\n\nforall x (Mini(x) and Exude(x, waite) -> Tubby(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The riley spiral the frederich. The riley is burly. The riley stimulate the kiersten. The riley hose the kiersten. The riley hose the frederich. The kiersten spiral the frederich. The kiersten is unhurried. The kiersten is emerging. The kiersten stimulate the riley. The kiersten stimulate the dorena. The frederich spiral the riley. The frederich stimulate the kiersten. The frederich hose the riley. The dorena spiral the kiersten. The dorena stimulate the kiersten. The dorena hose the kiersten. If someone hose the dorena and they chase the kiersten then the kiersten is unhurried. If someone is emerging and burly then they visit the kiersten. If someone stimulate the kiersten then the kiersten spiral the riley. If someone spiral the frederich and the frederich hose the kiersten then the kiersten spiral the riley. If the frederich is southbound and the frederich stimulate the kiersten then the frederich spiral the riley. If someone stimulate the riley then they visit the kiersten. If someone is tearless then they see the dorena. If someone is emerging and they visit the kiersten then they are southbound. The frederich stimulate the dorena.", "logic": "\nSpiral(riley, frederich)\nBurly(riley)\nStimulate(riley, kiersten)\nHose(riley, kiersten)\nHose(riley, frederich)\nSpiral(kiersten, frederich)\nUnhurried(kiersten)\nEmerging(kiersten)\nStimulate(kiersten, riley)\nStimulate(kiersten, dorena)\nSpiral(frederich, riley)\nStimulate(frederich, kiersten)\nHose(frederich, riley)\nSpiral(dorena, kiersten)\nStimulate(dorena, kiersten)\nHose(dorena, kiersten)\nforall x (Hose(x, dorena) and Spiral(x, kiersten) -> Unhurried(kiersten))\nforall x (Emerging(x) and Burly(x) -> Hose(x, kiersten))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, kiersten) -> Spiral(kiersten, riley))\nforall x (Spiral(x, frederich) and Hose(frederich, kiersten) -> Spiral(kiersten, riley))\nSouthbound(frederich) and Stimulate(frederich, kiersten) -> Spiral(frederich, riley)\nforall x (Stimulate(x, riley) -> Hose(x, kiersten))\nforall x (Tearless(x) -> Stimulate(x, dorena))\nforall x (Emerging(x) and Hose(x, kiersten) -> Southbound(x))\n\nStimulate(frederich, dorena)\n\nforall x (Tearless(x) -> Stimulate(x, dorena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The guy dilapidate the bubba. The guy is gracious. The guy marinade the audie. The guy grunt the audie. The guy grunt the bubba. The audie dilapidate the bubba. The audie is epigastric. The audie is untended. The audie marinade the guy. The audie marinade the nathanael. The bubba dilapidate the guy. The bubba marinade the audie. The bubba grunt the guy. The nathanael dilapidate the audie. The nathanael marinade the audie. The nathanael grunt the audie. If someone grunt the nathanael and they chase the audie then the audie is epigastric. If someone is untended and gracious then they visit the audie. If someone marinade the audie then the audie dilapidate the guy. If someone dilapidate the bubba and the bubba grunt the audie then the audie dilapidate the guy. If the bubba is kittenish and the bubba marinade the audie then the bubba dilapidate the guy. If someone marinade the guy then they visit the audie. If someone is scarey then they see the nathanael. If someone is untended and they visit the audie then they are kittenish. The nathanael is not kittenish.", "logic": "\nDilapidate(guy, bubba)\nGracious(guy)\nMarinade(guy, audie)\nGrunt(guy, audie)\nGrunt(guy, bubba)\nDilapidate(audie, bubba)\nEpigastric(audie)\nUntended(audie)\nMarinade(audie, guy)\nMarinade(audie, nathanael)\nDilapidate(bubba, guy)\nMarinade(bubba, audie)\nGrunt(bubba, guy)\nDilapidate(nathanael, audie)\nMarinade(nathanael, audie)\nGrunt(nathanael, audie)\nforall x (Grunt(x, nathanael) and Dilapidate(x, audie) -> Epigastric(audie))\nforall x (Untended(x) and Gracious(x) -> Grunt(x, audie))\nforall x (Marinade(x, audie) -> Dilapidate(audie, guy))\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, bubba) and Grunt(bubba, audie) -> Dilapidate(audie, guy))\nKittenish(bubba) and Marinade(bubba, audie) -> Dilapidate(bubba, guy)\nforall x (Marinade(x, guy) -> Grunt(x, audie))\nforall x (Scarey(x) -> Marinade(x, nathanael))\nforall x (Untended(x) and Grunt(x, audie) -> Kittenish(x))\n\nnot Kittenish(nathanael)\n\nforall x (Untended(x) and Grunt(x, audie) -> Kittenish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The bobinette initial the lucia. The bobinette is flash. The bobinette undeceive the phelia. The bobinette divest the phelia. The bobinette divest the lucia. The phelia initial the lucia. The phelia is argentine. The phelia is tasseled. The phelia undeceive the bobinette. The phelia undeceive the marlin. The lucia initial the bobinette. The lucia undeceive the phelia. The lucia divest the bobinette. The marlin initial the phelia. The marlin undeceive the phelia. The marlin divest the phelia. If someone divest the marlin and they chase the phelia then the phelia is argentine. If someone is tasseled and flash then they visit the phelia. If someone undeceive the phelia then the phelia initial the bobinette. If someone initial the lucia and the lucia divest the phelia then the phelia initial the bobinette. If the lucia is reflexive and the lucia undeceive the phelia then the lucia initial the bobinette. If someone undeceive the bobinette then they visit the phelia. If someone is squared then they see the marlin. If someone is tasseled and they visit the phelia then they are reflexive. The marlin undeceive the lucia.", "logic": "\nInitial(bobinette, lucia)\nFlash(bobinette)\nUndeceive(bobinette, phelia)\nDivest(bobinette, phelia)\nDivest(bobinette, lucia)\nInitial(phelia, lucia)\nArgentine(phelia)\nTasseled(phelia)\nUndeceive(phelia, bobinette)\nUndeceive(phelia, marlin)\nInitial(lucia, bobinette)\nUndeceive(lucia, phelia)\nDivest(lucia, bobinette)\nInitial(marlin, phelia)\nUndeceive(marlin, phelia)\nDivest(marlin, phelia)\nforall x (Divest(x, marlin) and Initial(x, phelia) -> Argentine(phelia))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Flash(x) -> Divest(x, phelia))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, phelia) -> Initial(phelia, bobinette))\nforall x (Initial(x, lucia) and Divest(lucia, phelia) -> Initial(phelia, bobinette))\nReflexive(lucia) and Undeceive(lucia, phelia) -> Initial(lucia, bobinette)\nforall x (Undeceive(x, bobinette) -> Divest(x, phelia))\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Undeceive(x, marlin))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Divest(x, phelia) -> Reflexive(x))\n\nUndeceive(marlin, lucia)\n\nUndeceive(marlin, lucia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The claudio pauperise the giraldo. The claudio is direct. The claudio fair the zandra. The claudio vesicate the zandra. The claudio vesicate the giraldo. The zandra pauperise the giraldo. The zandra is aeolian. The zandra is unmatched. The zandra fair the claudio. The zandra fair the loree. The giraldo pauperise the claudio. The giraldo fair the zandra. The giraldo vesicate the claudio. The loree pauperise the zandra. The loree fair the zandra. The loree vesicate the zandra. If someone vesicate the loree and they chase the zandra then the zandra is aeolian. If someone is unmatched and direct then they visit the zandra. If someone fair the zandra then the zandra pauperise the claudio. If someone pauperise the giraldo and the giraldo vesicate the zandra then the zandra pauperise the claudio. If the giraldo is goateed and the giraldo fair the zandra then the giraldo pauperise the claudio. If someone fair the claudio then they visit the zandra. If someone is bestubbled then they see the loree. If someone is unmatched and they visit the zandra then they are goateed. The loree does not see the claudio.", "logic": "\nPauperise(claudio, giraldo)\nDirect(claudio)\nFair(claudio, zandra)\nVesicate(claudio, zandra)\nVesicate(claudio, giraldo)\nPauperise(zandra, giraldo)\nAeolian(zandra)\nUnmatched(zandra)\nFair(zandra, claudio)\nFair(zandra, loree)\nPauperise(giraldo, claudio)\nFair(giraldo, zandra)\nVesicate(giraldo, claudio)\nPauperise(loree, zandra)\nFair(loree, zandra)\nVesicate(loree, zandra)\nforall x (Vesicate(x, loree) and Pauperise(x, zandra) -> Aeolian(zandra))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) and Direct(x) -> Vesicate(x, zandra))\nforall x (Fair(x, zandra) -> Pauperise(zandra, claudio))\nforall x (Pauperise(x, giraldo) and Vesicate(giraldo, zandra) -> Pauperise(zandra, claudio))\nGoateed(giraldo) and Fair(giraldo, zandra) -> Pauperise(giraldo, claudio)\nforall x (Fair(x, claudio) -> Vesicate(x, zandra))\nforall x (Bestubbled(x) -> Fair(x, loree))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) and Vesicate(x, zandra) -> Goateed(x))\n\nnot Fair(loree, claudio)\n\nnot Fair(loree, claudio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "The christin caliper the kizzee. The christin is suburban. The christin suntan the forester. The christin block the forester. The christin block the kizzee. The forester caliper the kizzee. The forester is gawky. The forester is uncreative. The forester suntan the christin. The forester suntan the celinka. The kizzee caliper the christin. The kizzee suntan the forester. The kizzee block the christin. The celinka caliper the forester. The celinka suntan the forester. The celinka block the forester. If someone block the celinka and they chase the forester then the forester is gawky. If someone is uncreative and suburban then they visit the forester. If someone suntan the forester then the forester caliper the christin. If someone caliper the kizzee and the kizzee block the forester then the forester caliper the christin. If the kizzee is downhill and the kizzee suntan the forester then the kizzee caliper the christin. If someone suntan the christin then they visit the forester. If someone is unstrung then they see the celinka. If someone is uncreative and they visit the forester then they are downhill. The forester is suburban.", "logic": "\nCaliper(christin, kizzee)\nSuburban(christin)\nSuntan(christin, forester)\nBlock(christin, forester)\nBlock(christin, kizzee)\nCaliper(forester, kizzee)\nGawky(forester)\nUncreative(forester)\nSuntan(forester, christin)\nSuntan(forester, celinka)\nCaliper(kizzee, christin)\nSuntan(kizzee, forester)\nBlock(kizzee, christin)\nCaliper(celinka, forester)\nSuntan(celinka, forester)\nBlock(celinka, forester)\nforall x (Block(x, celinka) and Caliper(x, forester) -> Gawky(forester))\nforall x (Uncreative(x) and Suburban(x) -> Block(x, forester))\nforall x (Suntan(x, forester) -> Caliper(forester, christin))\nforall x (Caliper(x, kizzee) and Block(kizzee, forester) -> Caliper(forester, christin))\nDownhill(kizzee) and Suntan(kizzee, forester) -> Caliper(kizzee, christin)\nforall x (Suntan(x, christin) -> Block(x, forester))\nforall x (Unstrung(x) -> Suntan(x, celinka))\nforall x (Uncreative(x) and Block(x, forester) -> Downhill(x))\n\nSuburban(forester)\n\nSuburban(forester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2121"} {"premises": "Conney is sized. Conney is phreatic. Conney is perfoliate. Conney is asterisked. Tia is sized. Tia is monogynous. Tia is perfoliate. Tia is unhumorous. Tia is asterisked. Boyd is sized. Boyd is monogynous. Boyd is passerine. Boyd is phreatic. Boyd is unhumorous. Boyd is asterisked. If someone is phreatic and sized then they are monogynous. If someone is phreatic then they are asterisked. If someone is passerine and asterisked then they are perfoliate. If someone is perfoliate then they are phreatic. If someone is monogynous then they are passerine. If someone is phreatic then they are unhumorous. Boyd is sized.", "logic": "\nSized(conney)\nPhreatic(conney)\nPerfoliate(conney)\nAsterisked(conney)\nSized(tia)\nMonogynous(tia)\nPerfoliate(tia)\nUnhumorous(tia)\nAsterisked(tia)\nSized(boyd)\nMonogynous(boyd)\nPasserine(boyd)\nPhreatic(boyd)\nUnhumorous(boyd)\nAsterisked(boyd)\nforall x (Phreatic(x) and Sized(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nforall x (Phreatic(x) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Asterisked(x) -> Perfoliate(x))\nforall x (Perfoliate(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) -> Passerine(x))\nforall x (Phreatic(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\n\nSized(boyd)\n\ntherefore Sized(boyd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2374"} {"premises": "Alisun is apish. Alisun is bastard. Alisun is defined. Alisun is thyroidal. Wandie is apish. Wandie is horrified. Wandie is defined. Wandie is cabalistic. Wandie is thyroidal. Harmonia is apish. Harmonia is horrified. Harmonia is slow. Harmonia is bastard. Harmonia is cabalistic. Harmonia is thyroidal. If someone is bastard and apish then they are horrified. If someone is bastard then they are thyroidal. If someone is slow and thyroidal then they are defined. If someone is defined then they are bastard. If someone is horrified then they are slow. If someone is bastard then they are cabalistic. Wandie is not thyroidal.", "logic": "\nApish(alisun)\nBastard(alisun)\nDefined(alisun)\nThyroidal(alisun)\nApish(wandie)\nHorrified(wandie)\nDefined(wandie)\nCabalistic(wandie)\nThyroidal(wandie)\nApish(harmonia)\nHorrified(harmonia)\nSlow(harmonia)\nBastard(harmonia)\nCabalistic(harmonia)\nThyroidal(harmonia)\nforall x (Bastard(x) and Apish(x) -> Horrified(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\nforall x (Slow(x) and Thyroidal(x) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Defined(x) -> Bastard(x))\nforall x (Horrified(x) -> Slow(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\n\nnot Thyroidal(wandie)\n\ntherefore Thyroidal(wandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2374"} {"premises": "Doroteya is nonracist. Doroteya is carpetbag. Doroteya is built. Doroteya is blowsy. Casi is nonracist. Casi is unsafe. Casi is built. Casi is perianal. Casi is blowsy. Morena is nonracist. Morena is unsafe. Morena is siamese. Morena is carpetbag. Morena is perianal. Morena is blowsy. If someone is carpetbag and nonracist then they are unsafe. If someone is carpetbag then they are blowsy. If someone is siamese and blowsy then they are built. If someone is built then they are carpetbag. If someone is unsafe then they are siamese. If someone is carpetbag then they are perianal. Morena is built.", "logic": "\nNonracist(doroteya)\nCarpetbag(doroteya)\nBuilt(doroteya)\nBlowsy(doroteya)\nNonracist(casi)\nUnsafe(casi)\nBuilt(casi)\nPerianal(casi)\nBlowsy(casi)\nNonracist(morena)\nUnsafe(morena)\nSiamese(morena)\nCarpetbag(morena)\nPerianal(morena)\nBlowsy(morena)\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) and Nonracist(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) -> Blowsy(x))\nforall x (Siamese(x) and Blowsy(x) -> Built(x))\nforall x (Built(x) -> Carpetbag(x))\nforall x (Unsafe(x) -> Siamese(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) -> Perianal(x))\n\nBuilt(morena)\n\nSiamese(morena) and Blowsy(morena) and forall x (Siamese(x) and Blowsy(x) -> Built(x)) -> therefore Built(morena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2374"} {"premises": "Rachael is heady. Rachael is nigh. Rachael is slovenly. Rachael is isopteran. Catharina is heady. Catharina is convulsive. Catharina is slovenly. Catharina is ecumenical. Catharina is isopteran. Florenza is heady. Florenza is convulsive. Florenza is vacuolate. Florenza is nigh. Florenza is ecumenical. Florenza is isopteran. If someone is nigh and heady then they are convulsive. If someone is nigh then they are isopteran. If someone is vacuolate and isopteran then they are slovenly. If someone is slovenly then they are nigh. If someone is convulsive then they are vacuolate. If someone is nigh then they are ecumenical. Catharina is not vacuolate.", "logic": "\nHeady(rachael)\nNigh(rachael)\nSlovenly(rachael)\nIsopteran(rachael)\nHeady(catharina)\nConvulsive(catharina)\nSlovenly(catharina)\nEcumenical(catharina)\nIsopteran(catharina)\nHeady(florenza)\nConvulsive(florenza)\nVacuolate(florenza)\nNigh(florenza)\nEcumenical(florenza)\nIsopteran(florenza)\nforall x (Nigh(x) and Heady(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nforall x (Nigh(x) -> Isopteran(x))\nforall x (Vacuolate(x) and Isopteran(x) -> Slovenly(x))\nforall x (Slovenly(x) -> Nigh(x))\nforall x (Convulsive(x) -> Vacuolate(x))\nforall x (Nigh(x) -> Ecumenical(x))\n\nnot Vacuolate(catharina)\n\nConvulsive(catharina) and forall x (Convulsive(x) -> Vacuolate(x)) -> therefore Vacuolate(catharina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2374"} {"premises": "Davide is plumose. Davide is razed. Davide is sinuous. Davide is pseudo. Hakim is plumose. Hakim is wasteful. Hakim is sinuous. Hakim is regretful. Hakim is pseudo. Malena is plumose. Malena is wasteful. Malena is gradual. Malena is razed. Malena is regretful. Malena is pseudo. If someone is razed and plumose then they are wasteful. If someone is razed then they are pseudo. If someone is gradual and pseudo then they are sinuous. If someone is sinuous then they are razed. If someone is wasteful then they are gradual. If someone is razed then they are regretful. Davide is gradual.", "logic": "\nPlumose(davide)\nRazed(davide)\nSinuous(davide)\nPseudo(davide)\nPlumose(hakim)\nWasteful(hakim)\nSinuous(hakim)\nRegretful(hakim)\nPseudo(hakim)\nPlumose(malena)\nWasteful(malena)\nGradual(malena)\nRazed(malena)\nRegretful(malena)\nPseudo(malena)\nforall x (Razed(x) and Plumose(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Razed(x) -> Pseudo(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) and Pseudo(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nforall x (Sinuous(x) -> Razed(x))\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Gradual(x))\nforall x (Razed(x) -> Regretful(x))\n\nGradual(davide)\n\nRazed(davide) and Plumose(davide) and forall x (Razed(x) and Plumose(x) -> Wasteful(x)) -> therefore Wasteful(davide) Wasteful(davide) and forall x (Wasteful(x) -> Gradual(x)) -> therefore Gradual(davide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2374"} {"premises": "Barbra is caulked. Barbra is unproved. Barbra is acanthoid. Barbra is tentative. Avram is caulked. Avram is obligatory. Avram is acanthoid. Avram is contrite. Avram is tentative. Rheta is caulked. Rheta is obligatory. Rheta is utilized. Rheta is unproved. Rheta is contrite. Rheta is tentative. If someone is unproved and caulked then they are obligatory. If someone is unproved then they are tentative. If someone is utilized and tentative then they are acanthoid. If someone is acanthoid then they are unproved. If someone is obligatory then they are utilized. If someone is unproved then they are contrite. Barbra is not utilized.", "logic": "\nCaulked(barbra)\nUnproved(barbra)\nAcanthoid(barbra)\nTentative(barbra)\nCaulked(avram)\nObligatory(avram)\nAcanthoid(avram)\nContrite(avram)\nTentative(avram)\nCaulked(rheta)\nObligatory(rheta)\nUtilized(rheta)\nUnproved(rheta)\nContrite(rheta)\nTentative(rheta)\nforall x (Unproved(x) and Caulked(x) -> Obligatory(x))\nforall x (Unproved(x) -> Tentative(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) and Tentative(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) -> Unproved(x))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) -> Utilized(x))\nforall x (Unproved(x) -> Contrite(x))\n\nnot Utilized(barbra)\n\nUnproved(barbra) and Caulked(barbra) and forall x (Unproved(x) and Caulked(x) -> Obligatory(x)) -> therefore Obligatory(barbra) Obligatory(barbra) and forall x (Obligatory(x) -> Utilized(x)) -> therefore Utilized(barbra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2374"} {"premises": "The sanderson commence the coralie. The sanderson commence the sancho. The sanderson is illusory. The sanderson is greenish. The sanderson thurify the coralie. The sanderson thurify the sancho. The coralie commence the sancho. The coralie word the sanderson. The coralie is not brickle. The sancho commence the coralie. The sancho word the sanderson. The sancho is not unposed. The sancho is not greenish. The sancho is aspheric. The sancho thurify the sanderson. If something is greenish then it word the coralie. If something word the coralie then the coralie thurify the sancho. The sancho word the sanderson.", "logic": "\nCommence(sanderson, coralie)\nCommence(sanderson, sancho)\nIllusory(sanderson)\nGreenish(sanderson)\nThurify(sanderson, coralie)\nThurify(sanderson, sancho)\nCommence(coralie, sancho)\nWord(coralie, sanderson)\nnot Brickle(coralie)\nCommence(sancho, coralie)\nWord(sancho, sanderson)\nnot Unposed(sancho)\nnot Greenish(sancho)\nAspheric(sancho)\nThurify(sancho, sanderson)\nforall x (Greenish(x) -> Word(x, coralie))\nforall x (Word(x, coralie) -> Thurify(coralie, sancho))\n\nWord(sancho, sanderson)\n\ntherefore Word(sancho, sanderson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The corrianne rafter the carolie. The corrianne rafter the roanna. The corrianne is spry. The corrianne is unhoped. The corrianne dillydally the carolie. The corrianne dillydally the roanna. The carolie rafter the roanna. The carolie stay the corrianne. The carolie is not cathodic. The roanna rafter the carolie. The roanna stay the corrianne. The roanna is not untreated. The roanna is not unhoped. The roanna is isomorphic. The roanna dillydally the corrianne. If something is unhoped then it stay the carolie. If something stay the carolie then the carolie dillydally the roanna. The corrianne is not unhoped.", "logic": "\nRafter(corrianne, carolie)\nRafter(corrianne, roanna)\nSpry(corrianne)\nUnhoped(corrianne)\nDillydally(corrianne, carolie)\nDillydally(corrianne, roanna)\nRafter(carolie, roanna)\nStay(carolie, corrianne)\nnot Cathodic(carolie)\nRafter(roanna, carolie)\nStay(roanna, corrianne)\nnot Untreated(roanna)\nnot Unhoped(roanna)\nIsomorphic(roanna)\nDillydally(roanna, corrianne)\nforall x (Unhoped(x) -> Stay(x, carolie))\nforall x (Stay(x, carolie) -> Dillydally(carolie, roanna))\n\nnot Unhoped(corrianne)\n\ntherefore Unhoped(corrianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The denna retrogress the odelle. The denna retrogress the dulcy. The denna is unsullied. The denna is healthy. The denna unfold the odelle. The denna unfold the dulcy. The odelle retrogress the dulcy. The odelle stumble the denna. The odelle is not apophatic. The dulcy retrogress the odelle. The dulcy stumble the denna. The dulcy is not peachy. The dulcy is not healthy. The dulcy is knavish. The dulcy unfold the denna. If something is healthy then it stumble the odelle. If something stumble the odelle then the odelle unfold the dulcy. The denna stumble the odelle.", "logic": "\nRetrogress(denna, odelle)\nRetrogress(denna, dulcy)\nUnsullied(denna)\nHealthy(denna)\nUnfold(denna, odelle)\nUnfold(denna, dulcy)\nRetrogress(odelle, dulcy)\nStumble(odelle, denna)\nnot Apophatic(odelle)\nRetrogress(dulcy, odelle)\nStumble(dulcy, denna)\nnot Peachy(dulcy)\nnot Healthy(dulcy)\nKnavish(dulcy)\nUnfold(dulcy, denna)\nforall x (Healthy(x) -> Stumble(x, odelle))\nforall x (Stumble(x, odelle) -> Unfold(odelle, dulcy))\n\nStumble(denna, odelle)\n\nHealthy(denna) and forall x (Healthy(x) -> Stumble(x, odelle)) -> therefore Stumble(denna, odelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The rory cackel the thorstein. The rory cackel the jourdan. The rory is agreeable. The rory is vermillion. The rory jail the thorstein. The rory jail the jourdan. The thorstein cackel the jourdan. The thorstein precook the rory. The thorstein is not taped. The jourdan cackel the thorstein. The jourdan precook the rory. The jourdan is not genitive. The jourdan is not vermillion. The jourdan is carroty. The jourdan jail the rory. If something is vermillion then it precook the thorstein. If something precook the thorstein then the thorstein jail the jourdan. The rory does not eat the thorstein.", "logic": "\nCackel(rory, thorstein)\nCackel(rory, jourdan)\nAgreeable(rory)\nVermillion(rory)\nJail(rory, thorstein)\nJail(rory, jourdan)\nCackel(thorstein, jourdan)\nPrecook(thorstein, rory)\nnot Taped(thorstein)\nCackel(jourdan, thorstein)\nPrecook(jourdan, rory)\nnot Genitive(jourdan)\nnot Vermillion(jourdan)\nCarroty(jourdan)\nJail(jourdan, rory)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Precook(x, thorstein))\nforall x (Precook(x, thorstein) -> Jail(thorstein, jourdan))\n\nnot Precook(rory, thorstein)\n\nVermillion(rory) and forall x (Vermillion(x) -> Precook(x, thorstein)) -> therefore Precook(rory, thorstein)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The horace batik the shannen. The horace batik the simmonds. The horace is oleophobic. The horace is rimose. The horace swot the shannen. The horace swot the simmonds. The shannen batik the simmonds. The shannen undress the horace. The shannen is not plaguy. The simmonds batik the shannen. The simmonds undress the horace. The simmonds is not flaring. The simmonds is not rimose. The simmonds is rustling. The simmonds swot the horace. If something is rimose then it undress the shannen. If something undress the shannen then the shannen swot the simmonds. The shannen swot the simmonds.", "logic": "\nBatik(horace, shannen)\nBatik(horace, simmonds)\nOleophobic(horace)\nRimose(horace)\nSwot(horace, shannen)\nSwot(horace, simmonds)\nBatik(shannen, simmonds)\nUndress(shannen, horace)\nnot Plaguy(shannen)\nBatik(simmonds, shannen)\nUndress(simmonds, horace)\nnot Flaring(simmonds)\nnot Rimose(simmonds)\nRustling(simmonds)\nSwot(simmonds, horace)\nforall x (Rimose(x) -> Undress(x, shannen))\nforall x (Undress(x, shannen) -> Swot(shannen, simmonds))\n\nSwot(shannen, simmonds)\n\nRimose(horace) and forall x (Rimose(x) -> Undress(x, shannen)) -> therefore Undress(horace, shannen) Undress(horace, shannen) and forall x (Undress(x, shannen) -> Swot(shannen, simmonds)) -> therefore Swot(shannen, simmonds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The henri shush the rudolfo. The henri shush the waly. The henri is fearless. The henri is pitiable. The henri haunt the rudolfo. The henri haunt the waly. The rudolfo shush the waly. The rudolfo militate the henri. The rudolfo is not asymmetric. The waly shush the rudolfo. The waly militate the henri. The waly is not corporeal. The waly is not pitiable. The waly is unlighted. The waly haunt the henri. If something is pitiable then it militate the rudolfo. If something militate the rudolfo then the rudolfo haunt the waly. The rudolfo does not like the waly.", "logic": "\nShush(henri, rudolfo)\nShush(henri, waly)\nFearless(henri)\nPitiable(henri)\nHaunt(henri, rudolfo)\nHaunt(henri, waly)\nShush(rudolfo, waly)\nMilitate(rudolfo, henri)\nnot Asymmetric(rudolfo)\nShush(waly, rudolfo)\nMilitate(waly, henri)\nnot Corporeal(waly)\nnot Pitiable(waly)\nUnlighted(waly)\nHaunt(waly, henri)\nforall x (Pitiable(x) -> Militate(x, rudolfo))\nforall x (Militate(x, rudolfo) -> Haunt(rudolfo, waly))\n\nnot Haunt(rudolfo, waly)\n\nPitiable(henri) and forall x (Pitiable(x) -> Militate(x, rudolfo)) -> therefore Militate(henri, rudolfo) Militate(henri, rudolfo) and forall x (Militate(x, rudolfo) -> Haunt(rudolfo, waly)) -> therefore Haunt(rudolfo, waly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The freddi disforest the efram. The freddi disforest the tomkin. The freddi is sweptback. The freddi is aseptic. The freddi rope the efram. The freddi rope the tomkin. The efram disforest the tomkin. The efram prang the freddi. The efram is not stirred. The tomkin disforest the efram. The tomkin prang the freddi. The tomkin is not rapacious. The tomkin is not aseptic. The tomkin is sixteen. The tomkin rope the freddi. If something is aseptic then it prang the efram. If something prang the efram then the efram rope the tomkin. The tomkin does not eat the efram.", "logic": "\nDisforest(freddi, efram)\nDisforest(freddi, tomkin)\nSweptback(freddi)\nAseptic(freddi)\nRope(freddi, efram)\nRope(freddi, tomkin)\nDisforest(efram, tomkin)\nPrang(efram, freddi)\nnot Stirred(efram)\nDisforest(tomkin, efram)\nPrang(tomkin, freddi)\nnot Rapacious(tomkin)\nnot Aseptic(tomkin)\nSixteen(tomkin)\nRope(tomkin, freddi)\nforall x (Aseptic(x) -> Prang(x, efram))\nforall x (Prang(x, efram) -> Rope(efram, tomkin))\n\nnot Prang(tomkin, efram)\n\nforall x (Aseptic(x) -> Prang(x, efram)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The sallie cinematise the vittoria. The sallie cinematise the meggie. The sallie is ossicular. The sallie is virginal. The sallie starch the vittoria. The sallie starch the meggie. The vittoria cinematise the meggie. The vittoria initiate the sallie. The vittoria is not stoic. The meggie cinematise the vittoria. The meggie initiate the sallie. The meggie is not mayoral. The meggie is not virginal. The meggie is shintoist. The meggie starch the sallie. If something is virginal then it initiate the vittoria. If something initiate the vittoria then the vittoria starch the meggie. The vittoria initiate the vittoria.", "logic": "\nCinematise(sallie, vittoria)\nCinematise(sallie, meggie)\nOssicular(sallie)\nVirginal(sallie)\nStarch(sallie, vittoria)\nStarch(sallie, meggie)\nCinematise(vittoria, meggie)\nInitiate(vittoria, sallie)\nnot Stoic(vittoria)\nCinematise(meggie, vittoria)\nInitiate(meggie, sallie)\nnot Mayoral(meggie)\nnot Virginal(meggie)\nShintoist(meggie)\nStarch(meggie, sallie)\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Initiate(x, vittoria))\nforall x (Initiate(x, vittoria) -> Starch(vittoria, meggie))\n\nInitiate(vittoria, vittoria)\n\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Initiate(x, vittoria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The thorvald hobnail the gisella. The thorvald hobnail the libbie. The thorvald is auriculate. The thorvald is biomedical. The thorvald samba the gisella. The thorvald samba the libbie. The gisella hobnail the libbie. The gisella clock the thorvald. The gisella is not echolike. The libbie hobnail the gisella. The libbie clock the thorvald. The libbie is not hipless. The libbie is not biomedical. The libbie is untrained. The libbie samba the thorvald. If something is biomedical then it clock the gisella. If something clock the gisella then the gisella samba the libbie. The thorvald does not eat the libbie.", "logic": "\nHobnail(thorvald, gisella)\nHobnail(thorvald, libbie)\nAuriculate(thorvald)\nBiomedical(thorvald)\nSamba(thorvald, gisella)\nSamba(thorvald, libbie)\nHobnail(gisella, libbie)\nClock(gisella, thorvald)\nnot Echolike(gisella)\nHobnail(libbie, gisella)\nClock(libbie, thorvald)\nnot Hipless(libbie)\nnot Biomedical(libbie)\nUntrained(libbie)\nSamba(libbie, thorvald)\nforall x (Biomedical(x) -> Clock(x, gisella))\nforall x (Clock(x, gisella) -> Samba(gisella, libbie))\n\nnot Clock(thorvald, libbie)\n\nnot Clock(thorvald, libbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The kermit fullback the fons. The kermit fullback the deloria. The kermit is racemose. The kermit is ventricous. The kermit brainstorm the fons. The kermit brainstorm the deloria. The fons fullback the deloria. The fons defend the kermit. The fons is not prodigious. The deloria fullback the fons. The deloria defend the kermit. The deloria is not jerking. The deloria is not ventricous. The deloria is plumb. The deloria brainstorm the kermit. If something is ventricous then it defend the fons. If something defend the fons then the fons brainstorm the deloria. The fons is jerking.", "logic": "\nFullback(kermit, fons)\nFullback(kermit, deloria)\nRacemose(kermit)\nVentricous(kermit)\nBrainstorm(kermit, fons)\nBrainstorm(kermit, deloria)\nFullback(fons, deloria)\nDefend(fons, kermit)\nnot Prodigious(fons)\nFullback(deloria, fons)\nDefend(deloria, kermit)\nnot Jerking(deloria)\nnot Ventricous(deloria)\nPlumb(deloria)\nBrainstorm(deloria, kermit)\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> Defend(x, fons))\nforall x (Defend(x, fons) -> Brainstorm(fons, deloria))\n\nJerking(fons)\n\nJerking(fons) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The charin supervene the sterling. The charin supervene the jilly. The charin is abdicable. The charin is gordian. The charin shelter the sterling. The charin shelter the jilly. The sterling supervene the jilly. The sterling rephrase the charin. The sterling is not burned. The jilly supervene the sterling. The jilly rephrase the charin. The jilly is not sedate. The jilly is not gordian. The jilly is polynesian. The jilly shelter the charin. If something is gordian then it rephrase the sterling. If something rephrase the sterling then the sterling shelter the jilly. The jilly is not abdicable.", "logic": "\nSupervene(charin, sterling)\nSupervene(charin, jilly)\nAbdicable(charin)\nGordian(charin)\nShelter(charin, sterling)\nShelter(charin, jilly)\nSupervene(sterling, jilly)\nRephrase(sterling, charin)\nnot Burned(sterling)\nSupervene(jilly, sterling)\nRephrase(jilly, charin)\nnot Sedate(jilly)\nnot Gordian(jilly)\nPolynesian(jilly)\nShelter(jilly, charin)\nforall x (Gordian(x) -> Rephrase(x, sterling))\nforall x (Rephrase(x, sterling) -> Shelter(sterling, jilly))\n\nnot Abdicable(jilly)\n\nnot Abdicable(jilly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "The pegeen locate the melany. The pegeen locate the bathsheba. The pegeen is impolitic. The pegeen is nonresiny. The pegeen exposit the melany. The pegeen exposit the bathsheba. The melany locate the bathsheba. The melany deplete the pegeen. The melany is not fickle. The bathsheba locate the melany. The bathsheba deplete the pegeen. The bathsheba is not xcvi. The bathsheba is not nonresiny. The bathsheba is confiding. The bathsheba exposit the pegeen. If something is nonresiny then it deplete the melany. If something deplete the melany then the melany exposit the bathsheba. The melany exposit the pegeen.", "logic": "\nLocate(pegeen, melany)\nLocate(pegeen, bathsheba)\nImpolitic(pegeen)\nNonresiny(pegeen)\nExposit(pegeen, melany)\nExposit(pegeen, bathsheba)\nLocate(melany, bathsheba)\nDeplete(melany, pegeen)\nnot Fickle(melany)\nLocate(bathsheba, melany)\nDeplete(bathsheba, pegeen)\nnot Xcvi(bathsheba)\nnot Nonresiny(bathsheba)\nConfiding(bathsheba)\nExposit(bathsheba, pegeen)\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) -> Deplete(x, melany))\nforall x (Deplete(x, melany) -> Exposit(melany, bathsheba))\n\nExposit(melany, pegeen)\n\nExposit(melany, pegeen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-35"} {"premises": "Lizbeth is arrant. All arrant, swanky people are czarist. White, arrant people are chaetal. If Lizbeth is arrant and Lizbeth is persistent then Lizbeth is czarist. If someone is arrant then they are swanky. All persistent, czarist people are arrant. If Lizbeth is czarist and Lizbeth is unshaded then Lizbeth is versed. Lizbeth is arrant.", "logic": "\nArrant(lizbeth)\nforall x (Arrant(x) and Swanky(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) and Arrant(x) -> Chaetal(x))\nArrant(lizbeth) and Persistent(lizbeth) -> Czarist(lizbeth)\nforall x (Arrant(x) -> Swanky(x))\nforall x (Persistent(x) and Czarist(x) -> Arrant(x))\nCzarist(lizbeth) and Unshaded(lizbeth) -> Versed(lizbeth)\n\nArrant(lizbeth)\n\ntherefore Arrant(lizbeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Aurlie is unexpended. All unexpended, unparented people are slatey. White, unexpended people are validatory. If Aurlie is unexpended and Aurlie is uncoerced then Aurlie is slatey. If someone is unexpended then they are unparented. All uncoerced, slatey people are unexpended. If Aurlie is slatey and Aurlie is incurvate then Aurlie is ersatz. Aurlie is not unexpended.", "logic": "\nUnexpended(aurlie)\nforall x (Unexpended(x) and Unparented(x) -> Slatey(x))\nforall x (Unparented(x) and Unexpended(x) -> Validatory(x))\nUnexpended(aurlie) and Uncoerced(aurlie) -> Slatey(aurlie)\nforall x (Unexpended(x) -> Unparented(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) and Slatey(x) -> Unexpended(x))\nSlatey(aurlie) and Incurvate(aurlie) -> Ersatz(aurlie)\n\nnot Unexpended(aurlie)\n\ntherefore Unexpended(aurlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Elysia is lukewarm. All lukewarm, fused people are besieged. White, lukewarm people are salivary. If Elysia is lukewarm and Elysia is xcviii then Elysia is besieged. If someone is lukewarm then they are fused. All xcviii, besieged people are lukewarm. If Elysia is besieged and Elysia is sacculated then Elysia is trembling. Elysia is fused.", "logic": "\nLukewarm(elysia)\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) and Fused(x) -> Besieged(x))\nforall x (Fused(x) and Lukewarm(x) -> Salivary(x))\nLukewarm(elysia) and Xcviii(elysia) -> Besieged(elysia)\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) -> Fused(x))\nforall x (Xcviii(x) and Besieged(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\nBesieged(elysia) and Sacculated(elysia) -> Trembling(elysia)\n\nFused(elysia)\n\nLukewarm(elysia) and forall x (Lukewarm(x) -> Fused(x)) -> therefore Fused(elysia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Derrol is palpebrate. All palpebrate, hmong people are elfin. White, palpebrate people are treeless. If Derrol is palpebrate and Derrol is seventy then Derrol is elfin. If someone is palpebrate then they are hmong. All seventy, elfin people are palpebrate. If Derrol is elfin and Derrol is buttery then Derrol is reviving. Derrol is not hmong.", "logic": "\nPalpebrate(derrol)\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and Hmong(x) -> Elfin(x))\nforall x (Hmong(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Treeless(x))\nPalpebrate(derrol) and Seventy(derrol) -> Elfin(derrol)\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Hmong(x))\nforall x (Seventy(x) and Elfin(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nElfin(derrol) and Buttery(derrol) -> Reviving(derrol)\n\nnot Hmong(derrol)\n\nPalpebrate(derrol) and forall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Hmong(x)) -> therefore Hmong(derrol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Sanderson is autologous. All autologous, papal people are euphonical. White, autologous people are crocketed. If Sanderson is autologous and Sanderson is peripteral then Sanderson is euphonical. If someone is autologous then they are papal. All peripteral, euphonical people are autologous. If Sanderson is euphonical and Sanderson is bestial then Sanderson is springy. Sanderson is crocketed.", "logic": "\nAutologous(sanderson)\nforall x (Autologous(x) and Papal(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Papal(x) and Autologous(x) -> Crocketed(x))\nAutologous(sanderson) and Peripteral(sanderson) -> Euphonical(sanderson)\nforall x (Autologous(x) -> Papal(x))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) and Euphonical(x) -> Autologous(x))\nEuphonical(sanderson) and Bestial(sanderson) -> Springy(sanderson)\n\nCrocketed(sanderson)\n\nAutologous(sanderson) and forall x (Autologous(x) -> Papal(x)) -> therefore Papal(sanderson) Papal(sanderson) and Autologous(sanderson) and forall x (Papal(x) and Autologous(x) -> Crocketed(x)) -> therefore Crocketed(sanderson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Gui is dated. All dated, shavian people are deductible. White, dated people are iron. If Gui is dated and Gui is livable then Gui is deductible. If someone is dated then they are shavian. All livable, deductible people are dated. If Gui is deductible and Gui is tonsured then Gui is unforceful. Gui is not deductible.", "logic": "\nDated(gui)\nforall x (Dated(x) and Shavian(x) -> Deductible(x))\nforall x (Shavian(x) and Dated(x) -> Iron(x))\nDated(gui) and Livable(gui) -> Deductible(gui)\nforall x (Dated(x) -> Shavian(x))\nforall x (Livable(x) and Deductible(x) -> Dated(x))\nDeductible(gui) and Tonsured(gui) -> Unforceful(gui)\n\nnot Deductible(gui)\n\nDated(gui) and forall x (Dated(x) -> Shavian(x)) -> therefore Shavian(gui) Dated(gui) and Shavian(gui) and forall x (Dated(x) and Shavian(x) -> Deductible(x)) -> therefore Deductible(gui)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Esma is silent. All silent, incapable people are triassic. White, silent people are chanted. If Esma is silent and Esma is unfastened then Esma is triassic. If someone is silent then they are incapable. All unfastened, triassic people are silent. If Esma is triassic and Esma is selective then Esma is ahorse. Esma is not ahorse.", "logic": "\nSilent(esma)\nforall x (Silent(x) and Incapable(x) -> Triassic(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) and Silent(x) -> Chanted(x))\nSilent(esma) and Unfastened(esma) -> Triassic(esma)\nforall x (Silent(x) -> Incapable(x))\nforall x (Unfastened(x) and Triassic(x) -> Silent(x))\nTriassic(esma) and Selective(esma) -> Ahorse(esma)\n\nnot Ahorse(esma)\n\nTriassic(esma) and Selective(esma) -> Ahorse(esma) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Cortese is ungoverned. All ungoverned, scrubby people are dystopian. White, ungoverned people are chantlike. If Cortese is ungoverned and Cortese is softened then Cortese is dystopian. If someone is ungoverned then they are scrubby. All softened, dystopian people are ungoverned. If Cortese is dystopian and Cortese is averse then Cortese is second. Cortese is softened.", "logic": "\nUngoverned(cortese)\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and Scrubby(x) -> Dystopian(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) and Ungoverned(x) -> Chantlike(x))\nUngoverned(cortese) and Softened(cortese) -> Dystopian(cortese)\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Scrubby(x))\nforall x (Softened(x) and Dystopian(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nDystopian(cortese) and Averse(cortese) -> Second(cortese)\n\nSoftened(cortese)\n\nSoftened(cortese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Kellsie is unfixed. Dionne is reactive. Royce is dabbled. All dabbled things are not diarrhoeal. If something is dabbled then it is not diarrhoeal. All unfixed things are dabbled. Dionne is reactive.", "logic": "\nUnfixed(kellsie)\nReactive(dionne)\nDabbled(royce)\nforall x (Dabbled(x) -> not Diarrhoeal(x))\nforall x (Dabbled(x) -> not Diarrhoeal(x))\nforall x (Unfixed(x) -> Dabbled(x))\n\nReactive(dionne)\n\ntherefore Reactive(dionne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Dorree is soporific. Abdel is taciturn. Aub is aciduric. All aciduric things are not offsides. If something is aciduric then it is not offsides. All soporific things are aciduric. Dorree is not soporific.", "logic": "\nSoporific(dorree)\nTaciturn(abdel)\nAciduric(aub)\nforall x (Aciduric(x) -> not Offsides(x))\nforall x (Aciduric(x) -> not Offsides(x))\nforall x (Soporific(x) -> Aciduric(x))\n\nnot Soporific(dorree)\n\ntherefore Soporific(dorree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Cornie is homophile. Lucie is beseeching. Garp is nuptial. All nuptial things are not uncrossed. If something is nuptial then it is not uncrossed. All homophile things are nuptial. Cornie is nuptial.", "logic": "\nHomophile(cornie)\nBeseeching(lucie)\nNuptial(garp)\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> not Uncrossed(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> not Uncrossed(x))\nforall x (Homophile(x) -> Nuptial(x))\n\nNuptial(cornie)\n\nHomophile(cornie) and forall x (Homophile(x) -> Nuptial(x)) -> therefore Nuptial(cornie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Sophey is skittish. Keefe is caddish. Noreen is denudate. All denudate things are not painful. If something is denudate then it is not painful. All skittish things are denudate. Noreen is painful.", "logic": "\nSkittish(sophey)\nCaddish(keefe)\nDenudate(noreen)\nforall x (Denudate(x) -> not Painful(x))\nforall x (Denudate(x) -> not Painful(x))\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Denudate(x))\n\nPainful(noreen)\n\nDenudate(noreen) and forall x (Denudate(x) -> not Painful(x)) -> therefore not Painful(noreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Denice is prognostic. Parry is surefooted. Elwyn is disjointed. All disjointed things are not figurative. If something is disjointed then it is not figurative. All prognostic things are disjointed. Denice is not figurative.", "logic": "\nPrognostic(denice)\nSurefooted(parry)\nDisjointed(elwyn)\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> not Figurative(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> not Figurative(x))\nforall x (Prognostic(x) -> Disjointed(x))\n\nnot Figurative(denice)\n\nPrognostic(denice) and forall x (Prognostic(x) -> Disjointed(x)) -> therefore Disjointed(denice) Disjointed(denice) and forall x (Disjointed(x) -> not Figurative(x)) -> therefore not Figurative(denice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Linnea is depressant. Sinclare is nucleate. Robbi is nonliteral. All nonliteral things are not aphaeretic. If something is nonliteral then it is not aphaeretic. All depressant things are nonliteral. Linnea is aphaeretic.", "logic": "\nDepressant(linnea)\nNucleate(sinclare)\nNonliteral(robbi)\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> not Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> not Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Depressant(x) -> Nonliteral(x))\n\nAphaeretic(linnea)\n\nDepressant(linnea) and forall x (Depressant(x) -> Nonliteral(x)) -> therefore Nonliteral(linnea) Nonliteral(linnea) and forall x (Nonliteral(x) -> not Aphaeretic(x)) -> therefore not Aphaeretic(linnea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Dot is phony. Carlita is manichean. Fletcher is viii. All viii things are not surging. If something is viii then it is not surging. All phony things are viii. Carlita is not viii.", "logic": "\nPhony(dot)\nManichean(carlita)\nViii(fletcher)\nforall x (Viii(x) -> not Surging(x))\nforall x (Viii(x) -> not Surging(x))\nforall x (Phony(x) -> Viii(x))\n\nnot Viii(carlita)\n\nforall x (Phony(x) -> Viii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Patrik is unwounded. Reed is ungrateful. Sydel is inland. All inland things are not negotiable. If something is inland then it is not negotiable. All unwounded things are inland. Reed is unwounded.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(patrik)\nUngrateful(reed)\nInland(sydel)\nforall x (Inland(x) -> not Negotiable(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) -> not Negotiable(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) -> Inland(x))\n\nUnwounded(reed)\n\nUnwounded(reed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Fara is clenched. Pearla is decorous. Fiorenze is astringent. All astringent things are not agonized. If something is astringent then it is not agonized. All clenched things are astringent. Pearla is not rough.", "logic": "\nClenched(fara)\nDecorous(pearla)\nAstringent(fiorenze)\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> not Agonized(x))\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> not Agonized(x))\nforall x (Clenched(x) -> Astringent(x))\n\nnot Rough(pearla)\n\nnot Rough(pearla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Cherice is xxvii. Florance is smoothened. Shay is upwind. All upwind things are not cogitative. If something is upwind then it is not cogitative. All xxvii things are upwind. Cherice is rough.", "logic": "\nXxvii(cherice)\nSmoothened(florance)\nUpwind(shay)\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> not Cogitative(x))\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> not Cogitative(x))\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> Upwind(x))\n\nRough(cherice)\n\nRough(cherice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Elianora is lucid. Natalee is deplorable. Angelico is uppercase. All uppercase things are not monetary. If something is uppercase then it is not monetary. All lucid things are uppercase. Angelico is not rough.", "logic": "\nLucid(elianora)\nDeplorable(natalee)\nUppercase(angelico)\nforall x (Uppercase(x) -> not Monetary(x))\nforall x (Uppercase(x) -> not Monetary(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) -> Uppercase(x))\n\nnot Rough(angelico)\n\nnot Rough(angelico) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Cleva is stupendous. Talya is occult. Missie is redemptory. All redemptory things are not embolic. If something is redemptory then it is not embolic. All stupendous things are redemptory. Cleva is quiet.", "logic": "\nStupendous(cleva)\nOccult(talya)\nRedemptory(missie)\nforall x (Redemptory(x) -> not Embolic(x))\nforall x (Redemptory(x) -> not Embolic(x))\nforall x (Stupendous(x) -> Redemptory(x))\n\nQuiet(cleva)\n\nQuiet(cleva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-506"} {"premises": "Katleen is unneeded. Dalenna is parental. Kristina is straggly. If something is unneeded then it is tagged. All unneeded, straggly things are tagged. If something is unsocial and not goddamn then it is not parental. If something is unneeded then it is not parental. If Dalenna is parental then Dalenna is not straggly. If something is tagged then it is nameless. Dalenna is parental.", "logic": "\nUnneeded(katleen)\nParental(dalenna)\nStraggly(kristina)\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> Tagged(x))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and Straggly(x) -> Tagged(x))\nforall x (Unsocial(x) and not Goddamn(x) -> not Parental(x))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> not Parental(x))\nParental(dalenna) -> not Straggly(dalenna)\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Nameless(x))\n\nParental(dalenna)\n\ntherefore Parental(dalenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Moselle is flossy. Germain is grammatic. Ruby is entitled. If something is flossy then it is peptic. All flossy, entitled things are peptic. If something is malefic and not infrahuman then it is not grammatic. If something is flossy then it is not grammatic. If Germain is grammatic then Germain is not entitled. If something is peptic then it is antipodal. Germain is not grammatic.", "logic": "\nFlossy(moselle)\nGrammatic(germain)\nEntitled(ruby)\nforall x (Flossy(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Flossy(x) and Entitled(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Malefic(x) and not Infrahuman(x) -> not Grammatic(x))\nforall x (Flossy(x) -> not Grammatic(x))\nGrammatic(germain) -> not Entitled(germain)\nforall x (Peptic(x) -> Antipodal(x))\n\nnot Grammatic(germain)\n\ntherefore Grammatic(germain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Rodrick is tubed. Patricio is pricey. Griffin is reptilian. If something is tubed then it is mixed. All tubed, reptilian things are mixed. If something is iodized and not epidemic then it is not pricey. If something is tubed then it is not pricey. If Patricio is pricey then Patricio is not reptilian. If something is mixed then it is halcyon. Rodrick is not pricey.", "logic": "\nTubed(rodrick)\nPricey(patricio)\nReptilian(griffin)\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Mixed(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Mixed(x))\nforall x (Iodized(x) and not Epidemic(x) -> not Pricey(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> not Pricey(x))\nPricey(patricio) -> not Reptilian(patricio)\nforall x (Mixed(x) -> Halcyon(x))\n\nnot Pricey(rodrick)\n\nTubed(rodrick) and forall x (Tubed(x) -> not Pricey(x)) -> therefore not Pricey(rodrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Leoline is cragged. Edithe is stitched. Adriaens is prize. If something is cragged then it is crowing. All cragged, prize things are crowing. If something is exhausted and not polemic then it is not stitched. If something is cragged then it is not stitched. If Edithe is stitched then Edithe is not prize. If something is crowing then it is actuated. Edithe is prize.", "logic": "\nCragged(leoline)\nStitched(edithe)\nPrize(adriaens)\nforall x (Cragged(x) -> Crowing(x))\nforall x (Cragged(x) and Prize(x) -> Crowing(x))\nforall x (Exhausted(x) and not Polemic(x) -> not Stitched(x))\nforall x (Cragged(x) -> not Stitched(x))\nStitched(edithe) -> not Prize(edithe)\nforall x (Crowing(x) -> Actuated(x))\n\nPrize(edithe)\n\nStitched(edithe) and Stitched(edithe) -> not Prize(edithe) -> therefore not Prize(edithe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Violante is churlish. Lesli is coccal. Upton is fatty. If something is churlish then it is mystical. All churlish, fatty things are mystical. If something is sent and not roughshod then it is not coccal. If something is churlish then it is not coccal. If Lesli is coccal then Lesli is not fatty. If something is mystical then it is scalar. Violante is scalar.", "logic": "\nChurlish(violante)\nCoccal(lesli)\nFatty(upton)\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> Mystical(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) and Fatty(x) -> Mystical(x))\nforall x (Sent(x) and not Roughshod(x) -> not Coccal(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> not Coccal(x))\nCoccal(lesli) -> not Fatty(lesli)\nforall x (Mystical(x) -> Scalar(x))\n\nScalar(violante)\n\nChurlish(violante) and forall x (Churlish(x) -> Mystical(x)) -> therefore Mystical(violante) Mystical(violante) and forall x (Mystical(x) -> Scalar(x)) -> therefore Scalar(violante)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Hamlin is operose. Jessa is dimmed. Lauri is mitotic. If something is operose then it is singing. All operose, mitotic things are singing. If something is burning and not windburnt then it is not dimmed. If something is operose then it is not dimmed. If Jessa is dimmed then Jessa is not mitotic. If something is singing then it is priapic. Hamlin is not priapic.", "logic": "\nOperose(hamlin)\nDimmed(jessa)\nMitotic(lauri)\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Singing(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) and Mitotic(x) -> Singing(x))\nforall x (Burning(x) and not Windburnt(x) -> not Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> not Dimmed(x))\nDimmed(jessa) -> not Mitotic(jessa)\nforall x (Singing(x) -> Priapic(x))\n\nnot Priapic(hamlin)\n\nOperose(hamlin) and forall x (Operose(x) -> Singing(x)) -> therefore Singing(hamlin) Singing(hamlin) and forall x (Singing(x) -> Priapic(x)) -> therefore Priapic(hamlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Christin is aboveboard. Corilla is mateless. Virgilio is negligible. If something is aboveboard then it is willing. All aboveboard, negligible things are willing. If something is exterior and not crank then it is not mateless. If something is aboveboard then it is not mateless. If Corilla is mateless then Corilla is not negligible. If something is willing then it is deficient. Corilla is not willing.", "logic": "\nAboveboard(christin)\nMateless(corilla)\nNegligible(virgilio)\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Willing(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) and Negligible(x) -> Willing(x))\nforall x (Exterior(x) and not Crank(x) -> not Mateless(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> not Mateless(x))\nMateless(corilla) -> not Negligible(corilla)\nforall x (Willing(x) -> Deficient(x))\n\nnot Willing(corilla)\n\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Willing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Diamond is lordly. Mari is petalous. Abel is lambent. If something is lordly then it is aldermanly. All lordly, lambent things are aldermanly. If something is oxonian and not sapphire then it is not petalous. If something is lordly then it is not petalous. If Mari is petalous then Mari is not lambent. If something is aldermanly then it is fashioned. Abel is aldermanly.", "logic": "\nLordly(diamond)\nPetalous(mari)\nLambent(abel)\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Aldermanly(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) and Lambent(x) -> Aldermanly(x))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) and not Sapphire(x) -> not Petalous(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> not Petalous(x))\nPetalous(mari) -> not Lambent(mari)\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Fashioned(x))\n\nAldermanly(abel)\n\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Aldermanly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Sylvia is joking. Randie is darwinian. Nicolette is spatulate. If something is joking then it is hispid. All joking, spatulate things are hispid. If something is boughed and not nidifugous then it is not darwinian. If something is joking then it is not darwinian. If Randie is darwinian then Randie is not spatulate. If something is hispid then it is ecological. Randie is not ecological.", "logic": "\nJoking(sylvia)\nDarwinian(randie)\nSpatulate(nicolette)\nforall x (Joking(x) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Joking(x) and Spatulate(x) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Boughed(x) and not Nidifugous(x) -> not Darwinian(x))\nforall x (Joking(x) -> not Darwinian(x))\nDarwinian(randie) -> not Spatulate(randie)\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Ecological(x))\n\nnot Ecological(randie)\n\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Ecological(x)) <- forall x (Joking(x) -> Hispid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Davina is ungodly. Cecilia is outback. Cissie is monodic. If something is ungodly then it is empty. All ungodly, monodic things are empty. If something is living and not lincolnian then it is not outback. If something is ungodly then it is not outback. If Cecilia is outback then Cecilia is not monodic. If something is empty then it is ignoble. Cissie is ungodly.", "logic": "\nUngodly(davina)\nOutback(cecilia)\nMonodic(cissie)\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> Empty(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) and Monodic(x) -> Empty(x))\nforall x (Living(x) and not Lincolnian(x) -> not Outback(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> not Outback(x))\nOutback(cecilia) -> not Monodic(cecilia)\nforall x (Empty(x) -> Ignoble(x))\n\nUngodly(cissie)\n\nUngodly(cissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Steffie is misguided. Rosette is cathodic. Hillary is perplexed. If something is misguided then it is corruptive. All misguided, perplexed things are corruptive. If something is clunky and not peritoneal then it is not cathodic. If something is misguided then it is not cathodic. If Rosette is cathodic then Rosette is not perplexed. If something is corruptive then it is boisterous. Rosette is not peritoneal.", "logic": "\nMisguided(steffie)\nCathodic(rosette)\nPerplexed(hillary)\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Corruptive(x))\nforall x (Misguided(x) and Perplexed(x) -> Corruptive(x))\nforall x (Clunky(x) and not Peritoneal(x) -> not Cathodic(x))\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> not Cathodic(x))\nCathodic(rosette) -> not Perplexed(rosette)\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Boisterous(x))\n\nnot Peritoneal(rosette)\n\nnot Peritoneal(rosette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "Nova is obligatory. Mela is loony. Pascale is tuxedoed. If something is obligatory then it is premarital. All obligatory, tuxedoed things are premarital. If something is comforting and not belemnitic then it is not loony. If something is obligatory then it is not loony. If Mela is loony then Mela is not tuxedoed. If something is premarital then it is thumping. Pascale is belemnitic.", "logic": "\nObligatory(nova)\nLoony(mela)\nTuxedoed(pascale)\nforall x (Obligatory(x) -> Premarital(x))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) and Tuxedoed(x) -> Premarital(x))\nforall x (Comforting(x) and not Belemnitic(x) -> not Loony(x))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) -> not Loony(x))\nLoony(mela) -> not Tuxedoed(mela)\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> Thumping(x))\n\nBelemnitic(pascale)\n\nBelemnitic(pascale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1760"} {"premises": "The fay profess the philly. The fay is biddable. The fay is tutorial. The fay is nonchalant. The fay is purgative. The fay slur the philly. The fay analogize the philly. The philly profess the fay. The philly is biddable. The philly is tutorial. The philly is beetle. The philly is nonchalant. The philly is purgative. The philly slur the fay. The philly analogize the fay. If something slur the philly then it profess the fay. If something profess the philly then the philly slur the fay. If something is nonchalant and it slur the philly then it is tutorial. If something is tutorial then it profess the philly. If something profess the fay then it analogize the fay. If the philly profess the fay then the philly analogize the fay. The fay slur the philly.", "logic": "\nProfess(fay, philly)\nBiddable(fay)\nTutorial(fay)\nNonchalant(fay)\nPurgative(fay)\nSlur(fay, philly)\nAnalogize(fay, philly)\nProfess(philly, fay)\nBiddable(philly)\nTutorial(philly)\nBeetle(philly)\nNonchalant(philly)\nPurgative(philly)\nSlur(philly, fay)\nAnalogize(philly, fay)\nforall x (Slur(x, philly) -> Profess(x, fay))\nforall x (Profess(x, philly) -> Slur(philly, fay))\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) and Slur(x, philly) -> Tutorial(x))\nforall x (Tutorial(x) -> Profess(x, philly))\nforall x (Profess(x, fay) -> Analogize(x, fay))\nProfess(philly, fay) -> Analogize(philly, fay)\n\nSlur(fay, philly)\n\ntherefore Slur(fay, philly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The anetta streak the algernon. The anetta is hesitant. The anetta is obnoxious. The anetta is mealy. The anetta is solo. The anetta jeopardize the algernon. The anetta ferment the algernon. The algernon streak the anetta. The algernon is hesitant. The algernon is obnoxious. The algernon is sparkly. The algernon is mealy. The algernon is solo. The algernon jeopardize the anetta. The algernon ferment the anetta. If something jeopardize the algernon then it streak the anetta. If something streak the algernon then the algernon jeopardize the anetta. If something is mealy and it jeopardize the algernon then it is obnoxious. If something is obnoxious then it streak the algernon. If something streak the anetta then it ferment the anetta. If the algernon streak the anetta then the algernon ferment the anetta. The anetta is not hesitant.", "logic": "\nStreak(anetta, algernon)\nHesitant(anetta)\nObnoxious(anetta)\nMealy(anetta)\nSolo(anetta)\nJeopardize(anetta, algernon)\nFerment(anetta, algernon)\nStreak(algernon, anetta)\nHesitant(algernon)\nObnoxious(algernon)\nSparkly(algernon)\nMealy(algernon)\nSolo(algernon)\nJeopardize(algernon, anetta)\nFerment(algernon, anetta)\nforall x (Jeopardize(x, algernon) -> Streak(x, anetta))\nforall x (Streak(x, algernon) -> Jeopardize(algernon, anetta))\nforall x (Mealy(x) and Jeopardize(x, algernon) -> Obnoxious(x))\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) -> Streak(x, algernon))\nforall x (Streak(x, anetta) -> Ferment(x, anetta))\nStreak(algernon, anetta) -> Ferment(algernon, anetta)\n\nnot Hesitant(anetta)\n\ntherefore Hesitant(anetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The lane yowl the jeniece. The lane is revolved. The lane is adjective. The lane is modifiable. The lane is pathetic. The lane clunk the jeniece. The lane deplumate the jeniece. The jeniece yowl the lane. The jeniece is revolved. The jeniece is adjective. The jeniece is snide. The jeniece is modifiable. The jeniece is pathetic. The jeniece clunk the lane. The jeniece deplumate the lane. If something clunk the jeniece then it yowl the lane. If something yowl the jeniece then the jeniece clunk the lane. If something is modifiable and it clunk the jeniece then it is adjective. If something is adjective then it yowl the jeniece. If something yowl the lane then it deplumate the lane. If the jeniece yowl the lane then the jeniece deplumate the lane. The lane yowl the lane.", "logic": "\nYowl(lane, jeniece)\nRevolved(lane)\nAdjective(lane)\nModifiable(lane)\nPathetic(lane)\nClunk(lane, jeniece)\nDeplumate(lane, jeniece)\nYowl(jeniece, lane)\nRevolved(jeniece)\nAdjective(jeniece)\nSnide(jeniece)\nModifiable(jeniece)\nPathetic(jeniece)\nClunk(jeniece, lane)\nDeplumate(jeniece, lane)\nforall x (Clunk(x, jeniece) -> Yowl(x, lane))\nforall x (Yowl(x, jeniece) -> Clunk(jeniece, lane))\nforall x (Modifiable(x) and Clunk(x, jeniece) -> Adjective(x))\nforall x (Adjective(x) -> Yowl(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Yowl(x, lane) -> Deplumate(x, lane))\nYowl(jeniece, lane) -> Deplumate(jeniece, lane)\n\nYowl(lane, lane)\n\nClunk(lane, jeniece) and forall x (Clunk(x, jeniece) -> Yowl(x, lane)) -> therefore Yowl(lane, lane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The damon excogitate the marylee. The damon is recurvate. The damon is eastmost. The damon is terrible. The damon is auditive. The damon fatten the marylee. The damon creosote the marylee. The marylee excogitate the damon. The marylee is recurvate. The marylee is eastmost. The marylee is algonquian. The marylee is terrible. The marylee is auditive. The marylee fatten the damon. The marylee creosote the damon. If something fatten the marylee then it excogitate the damon. If something excogitate the marylee then the marylee fatten the damon. If something is terrible and it fatten the marylee then it is eastmost. If something is eastmost then it excogitate the marylee. If something excogitate the damon then it creosote the damon. If the marylee excogitate the damon then the marylee creosote the damon. The marylee does not chase the marylee.", "logic": "\nExcogitate(damon, marylee)\nRecurvate(damon)\nEastmost(damon)\nTerrible(damon)\nAuditive(damon)\nFatten(damon, marylee)\nCreosote(damon, marylee)\nExcogitate(marylee, damon)\nRecurvate(marylee)\nEastmost(marylee)\nAlgonquian(marylee)\nTerrible(marylee)\nAuditive(marylee)\nFatten(marylee, damon)\nCreosote(marylee, damon)\nforall x (Fatten(x, marylee) -> Excogitate(x, damon))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, marylee) -> Fatten(marylee, damon))\nforall x (Terrible(x) and Fatten(x, marylee) -> Eastmost(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Excogitate(x, marylee))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, damon) -> Creosote(x, damon))\nExcogitate(marylee, damon) -> Creosote(marylee, damon)\n\nnot Excogitate(marylee, marylee)\n\nEastmost(marylee) and forall x (Eastmost(x) -> Excogitate(x, marylee)) -> therefore Excogitate(marylee, marylee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The christan overrefine the mercedes. The christan is painful. The christan is printable. The christan is logistical. The christan is wintry. The christan swear the mercedes. The christan oppress the mercedes. The mercedes overrefine the christan. The mercedes is painful. The mercedes is printable. The mercedes is efferent. The mercedes is logistical. The mercedes is wintry. The mercedes swear the christan. The mercedes oppress the christan. If something swear the mercedes then it overrefine the christan. If something overrefine the mercedes then the mercedes swear the christan. If something is logistical and it swear the mercedes then it is printable. If something is printable then it overrefine the mercedes. If something overrefine the christan then it oppress the christan. If the mercedes overrefine the christan then the mercedes oppress the christan. The christan oppress the christan.", "logic": "\nOverrefine(christan, mercedes)\nPainful(christan)\nPrintable(christan)\nLogistical(christan)\nWintry(christan)\nSwear(christan, mercedes)\nOppress(christan, mercedes)\nOverrefine(mercedes, christan)\nPainful(mercedes)\nPrintable(mercedes)\nEfferent(mercedes)\nLogistical(mercedes)\nWintry(mercedes)\nSwear(mercedes, christan)\nOppress(mercedes, christan)\nforall x (Swear(x, mercedes) -> Overrefine(x, christan))\nforall x (Overrefine(x, mercedes) -> Swear(mercedes, christan))\nforall x (Logistical(x) and Swear(x, mercedes) -> Printable(x))\nforall x (Printable(x) -> Overrefine(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Overrefine(x, christan) -> Oppress(x, christan))\nOverrefine(mercedes, christan) -> Oppress(mercedes, christan)\n\nOppress(christan, christan)\n\nSwear(christan, mercedes) and forall x (Swear(x, mercedes) -> Overrefine(x, christan)) -> therefore Overrefine(christan, christan) Overrefine(christan, christan) and forall x (Overrefine(x, christan) -> Oppress(x, christan)) -> therefore Oppress(christan, christan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The jed retract the mireille. The jed is knavish. The jed is doctrinal. The jed is accredited. The jed is biped. The jed baronetize the mireille. The jed waul the mireille. The mireille retract the jed. The mireille is knavish. The mireille is doctrinal. The mireille is mechanical. The mireille is accredited. The mireille is biped. The mireille baronetize the jed. The mireille waul the jed. If something baronetize the mireille then it retract the jed. If something retract the mireille then the mireille baronetize the jed. If something is accredited and it baronetize the mireille then it is doctrinal. If something is doctrinal then it retract the mireille. If something retract the jed then it waul the jed. If the mireille retract the jed then the mireille waul the jed. The jed does not need the jed.", "logic": "\nRetract(jed, mireille)\nKnavish(jed)\nDoctrinal(jed)\nAccredited(jed)\nBiped(jed)\nBaronetize(jed, mireille)\nWaul(jed, mireille)\nRetract(mireille, jed)\nKnavish(mireille)\nDoctrinal(mireille)\nMechanical(mireille)\nAccredited(mireille)\nBiped(mireille)\nBaronetize(mireille, jed)\nWaul(mireille, jed)\nforall x (Baronetize(x, mireille) -> Retract(x, jed))\nforall x (Retract(x, mireille) -> Baronetize(mireille, jed))\nforall x (Accredited(x) and Baronetize(x, mireille) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Doctrinal(x) -> Retract(x, mireille))\nforall x (Retract(x, jed) -> Waul(x, jed))\nRetract(mireille, jed) -> Waul(mireille, jed)\n\nnot Waul(jed, jed)\n\nBaronetize(jed, mireille) and forall x (Baronetize(x, mireille) -> Retract(x, jed)) -> therefore Retract(jed, jed) Retract(jed, jed) and forall x (Retract(x, jed) -> Waul(x, jed)) -> therefore Waul(jed, jed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The reynolds underlie the annabelle. The reynolds is maimed. The reynolds is chivalric. The reynolds is wolflike. The reynolds is swollen. The reynolds perish the annabelle. The reynolds botanize the annabelle. The annabelle underlie the reynolds. The annabelle is maimed. The annabelle is chivalric. The annabelle is enate. The annabelle is wolflike. The annabelle is swollen. The annabelle perish the reynolds. The annabelle botanize the reynolds. If something perish the annabelle then it underlie the reynolds. If something underlie the annabelle then the annabelle perish the reynolds. If something is wolflike and it perish the annabelle then it is chivalric. If something is chivalric then it underlie the annabelle. If something underlie the reynolds then it botanize the reynolds. If the annabelle underlie the reynolds then the annabelle botanize the reynolds. The annabelle does not need the annabelle.", "logic": "\nUnderlie(reynolds, annabelle)\nMaimed(reynolds)\nChivalric(reynolds)\nWolflike(reynolds)\nSwollen(reynolds)\nPerish(reynolds, annabelle)\nBotanize(reynolds, annabelle)\nUnderlie(annabelle, reynolds)\nMaimed(annabelle)\nChivalric(annabelle)\nEnate(annabelle)\nWolflike(annabelle)\nSwollen(annabelle)\nPerish(annabelle, reynolds)\nBotanize(annabelle, reynolds)\nforall x (Perish(x, annabelle) -> Underlie(x, reynolds))\nforall x (Underlie(x, annabelle) -> Perish(annabelle, reynolds))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) and Perish(x, annabelle) -> Chivalric(x))\nforall x (Chivalric(x) -> Underlie(x, annabelle))\nforall x (Underlie(x, reynolds) -> Botanize(x, reynolds))\nUnderlie(annabelle, reynolds) -> Botanize(annabelle, reynolds)\n\nnot Botanize(annabelle, annabelle)\n\nnot Botanize(annabelle, annabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The idalina edge the janette. The idalina is inviolable. The idalina is english. The idalina is rubicund. The idalina is indie. The idalina meliorate the janette. The idalina bear the janette. The janette edge the idalina. The janette is inviolable. The janette is english. The janette is undyed. The janette is rubicund. The janette is indie. The janette meliorate the idalina. The janette bear the idalina. If something meliorate the janette then it edge the idalina. If something edge the janette then the janette meliorate the idalina. If something is rubicund and it meliorate the janette then it is english. If something is english then it edge the janette. If something edge the idalina then it bear the idalina. If the janette edge the idalina then the janette bear the idalina. The idalina is undyed.", "logic": "\nEdge(idalina, janette)\nInviolable(idalina)\nEnglish(idalina)\nRubicund(idalina)\nIndie(idalina)\nMeliorate(idalina, janette)\nBear(idalina, janette)\nEdge(janette, idalina)\nInviolable(janette)\nEnglish(janette)\nUndyed(janette)\nRubicund(janette)\nIndie(janette)\nMeliorate(janette, idalina)\nBear(janette, idalina)\nforall x (Meliorate(x, janette) -> Edge(x, idalina))\nforall x (Edge(x, janette) -> Meliorate(janette, idalina))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) and Meliorate(x, janette) -> English(x))\nforall x (English(x) -> Edge(x, janette))\nforall x (Edge(x, idalina) -> Bear(x, idalina))\nEdge(janette, idalina) -> Bear(janette, idalina)\n\nUndyed(idalina)\n\nUndyed(idalina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The gussy transude the alfonse. The gussy is varnished. The gussy is smarmy. The gussy is cultivated. The gussy is fissile. The gussy heave the alfonse. The gussy route the alfonse. The alfonse transude the gussy. The alfonse is varnished. The alfonse is smarmy. The alfonse is weakening. The alfonse is cultivated. The alfonse is fissile. The alfonse heave the gussy. The alfonse route the gussy. If something heave the alfonse then it transude the gussy. If something transude the alfonse then the alfonse heave the gussy. If something is cultivated and it heave the alfonse then it is smarmy. If something is smarmy then it transude the alfonse. If something transude the gussy then it route the gussy. If the alfonse transude the gussy then the alfonse route the gussy. The alfonse does not like the alfonse.", "logic": "\nTransude(gussy, alfonse)\nVarnished(gussy)\nSmarmy(gussy)\nCultivated(gussy)\nFissile(gussy)\nHeave(gussy, alfonse)\nRoute(gussy, alfonse)\nTransude(alfonse, gussy)\nVarnished(alfonse)\nSmarmy(alfonse)\nWeakening(alfonse)\nCultivated(alfonse)\nFissile(alfonse)\nHeave(alfonse, gussy)\nRoute(alfonse, gussy)\nforall x (Heave(x, alfonse) -> Transude(x, gussy))\nforall x (Transude(x, alfonse) -> Heave(alfonse, gussy))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and Heave(x, alfonse) -> Smarmy(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) -> Transude(x, alfonse))\nforall x (Transude(x, gussy) -> Route(x, gussy))\nTransude(alfonse, gussy) -> Route(alfonse, gussy)\n\nnot Heave(alfonse, alfonse)\n\nnot Heave(alfonse, alfonse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "The cassondra outmarch the perle. The cassondra is sandalled. The cassondra is unlocated. The cassondra is northbound. The cassondra is sainted. The cassondra resurrect the perle. The cassondra bevel the perle. The perle outmarch the cassondra. The perle is sandalled. The perle is unlocated. The perle is sinful. The perle is northbound. The perle is sainted. The perle resurrect the cassondra. The perle bevel the cassondra. If something resurrect the perle then it outmarch the cassondra. If something outmarch the perle then the perle resurrect the cassondra. If something is northbound and it resurrect the perle then it is unlocated. If something is unlocated then it outmarch the perle. If something outmarch the cassondra then it bevel the cassondra. If the perle outmarch the cassondra then the perle bevel the cassondra. The cassondra resurrect the cassondra.", "logic": "\nOutmarch(cassondra, perle)\nSandalled(cassondra)\nUnlocated(cassondra)\nNorthbound(cassondra)\nSainted(cassondra)\nResurrect(cassondra, perle)\nBevel(cassondra, perle)\nOutmarch(perle, cassondra)\nSandalled(perle)\nUnlocated(perle)\nSinful(perle)\nNorthbound(perle)\nSainted(perle)\nResurrect(perle, cassondra)\nBevel(perle, cassondra)\nforall x (Resurrect(x, perle) -> Outmarch(x, cassondra))\nforall x (Outmarch(x, perle) -> Resurrect(perle, cassondra))\nforall x (Northbound(x) and Resurrect(x, perle) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Outmarch(x, perle))\nforall x (Outmarch(x, cassondra) -> Bevel(x, cassondra))\nOutmarch(perle, cassondra) -> Bevel(perle, cassondra)\n\nResurrect(cassondra, cassondra)\n\nResurrect(cassondra, cassondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1533"} {"premises": "Bryana is detectable. Elsie is special. Cain is untaped. Big, untaped things are anabolic. White things are special. All special things are credited. Elsie is special.", "logic": "\nDetectable(bryana)\nSpecial(elsie)\nUntaped(cain)\nforall x (Spirituous(x) and Untaped(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Detectable(x) -> Special(x))\nforall x (Special(x) -> Credited(x))\n\nSpecial(elsie)\n\ntherefore Special(elsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Mamie is dried. Blithe is liable. Melva is oral. Big, oral things are afflictive. White things are liable. All liable things are biting. Mamie is not dried.", "logic": "\nDried(mamie)\nLiable(blithe)\nOral(melva)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and Oral(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nforall x (Dried(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Biting(x))\n\nnot Dried(mamie)\n\ntherefore Dried(mamie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Lionello is ascendent. Hilliard is tibial. Donia is atrophied. Big, atrophied things are luckless. White things are tibial. All tibial things are arthritic. Hilliard is arthritic.", "logic": "\nAscendent(lionello)\nTibial(hilliard)\nAtrophied(donia)\nforall x (Yawning(x) and Atrophied(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> Tibial(x))\nforall x (Tibial(x) -> Arthritic(x))\n\nArthritic(hilliard)\n\nTibial(hilliard) and forall x (Tibial(x) -> Arthritic(x)) -> therefore Arthritic(hilliard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Kai is overnice. Miriam is precative. Gabriello is precatory. Big, precatory things are labeled. White things are precative. All precative things are disabling. Kai is not precative.", "logic": "\nOvernice(kai)\nPrecative(miriam)\nPrecatory(gabriello)\nforall x (Bedewed(x) and Precatory(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Overnice(x) -> Precative(x))\nforall x (Precative(x) -> Disabling(x))\n\nnot Precative(kai)\n\nOvernice(kai) and forall x (Overnice(x) -> Precative(x)) -> therefore Precative(kai)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Valaria is pivotal. Gabi is intrinsic. Cassi is deserved. Big, deserved things are foliate. White things are intrinsic. All intrinsic things are rustic. Valaria is rustic.", "logic": "\nPivotal(valaria)\nIntrinsic(gabi)\nDeserved(cassi)\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Deserved(x) -> Foliate(x))\nforall x (Pivotal(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Rustic(x))\n\nRustic(valaria)\n\nPivotal(valaria) and forall x (Pivotal(x) -> Intrinsic(x)) -> therefore Intrinsic(valaria) Intrinsic(valaria) and forall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Rustic(x)) -> therefore Rustic(valaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Jodee is unfirm. Bettine is panamanian. Drew is forbidden. Big, forbidden things are unexcelled. White things are panamanian. All panamanian things are corny. Jodee is not corny.", "logic": "\nUnfirm(jodee)\nPanamanian(bettine)\nForbidden(drew)\nforall x (Visionary(x) and Forbidden(x) -> Unexcelled(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Panamanian(x))\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Corny(x))\n\nnot Corny(jodee)\n\nUnfirm(jodee) and forall x (Unfirm(x) -> Panamanian(x)) -> therefore Panamanian(jodee) Panamanian(jodee) and forall x (Panamanian(x) -> Corny(x)) -> therefore Corny(jodee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Quinta is preferred. Wright is bespoken. Hermy is hardheaded. Big, hardheaded things are wedded. White things are bespoken. All bespoken things are ruling. Quinta is not wedded.", "logic": "\nPreferred(quinta)\nBespoken(wright)\nHardheaded(hermy)\nforall x (Latino(x) and Hardheaded(x) -> Wedded(x))\nforall x (Preferred(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Ruling(x))\n\nnot Wedded(quinta)\n\nforall x (Latino(x) and Hardheaded(x) -> Wedded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Clifton is akimbo. Morten is frenetic. Sheffield is cavalier. Big, cavalier things are stray. White things are frenetic. All frenetic things are unseeable. Sheffield is stray.", "logic": "\nAkimbo(clifton)\nFrenetic(morten)\nCavalier(sheffield)\nforall x (Bottom(x) and Cavalier(x) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Frenetic(x))\nforall x (Frenetic(x) -> Unseeable(x))\n\nStray(sheffield)\n\nforall x (Bottom(x) and Cavalier(x) -> Stray(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Andriette is limacoid. Darell is aecial. Odin is spic. Big, spic things are sombre. White things are aecial. All aecial things are identical. Odin is not aecial.", "logic": "\nLimacoid(andriette)\nAecial(darell)\nSpic(odin)\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Spic(x) -> Sombre(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Identical(x))\n\nnot Aecial(odin)\n\nforall x (Limacoid(x) -> Aecial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Celeste is possessed. Lancelot is climactic. Sarge is airtight. Big, airtight things are evident. White things are climactic. All climactic things are disgusted. Lancelot is airtight.", "logic": "\nPossessed(celeste)\nClimactic(lancelot)\nAirtight(sarge)\nforall x (Uterine(x) and Airtight(x) -> Evident(x))\nforall x (Possessed(x) -> Climactic(x))\nforall x (Climactic(x) -> Disgusted(x))\n\nAirtight(lancelot)\n\nAirtight(lancelot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Corey is mere. Farrand is serried. Maurita is stubby. Big, stubby things are pharyngeal. White things are serried. All serried things are heathen. Corey is not quiet.", "logic": "\nMere(corey)\nSerried(farrand)\nStubby(maurita)\nforall x (Augustan(x) and Stubby(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Serried(x))\nforall x (Serried(x) -> Heathen(x))\n\nnot Quiet(corey)\n\nnot Quiet(corey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Hanni is mesodermal. Roana is forehand. Jeannine is commensal. Big, commensal things are irritative. White things are forehand. All forehand things are liquified. Roana is mesodermal.", "logic": "\nMesodermal(hanni)\nForehand(roana)\nCommensal(jeannine)\nforall x (Mangey(x) and Commensal(x) -> Irritative(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Forehand(x))\nforall x (Forehand(x) -> Liquified(x))\n\nMesodermal(roana)\n\nMesodermal(roana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-854"} {"premises": "Ibby is amicable. Jacintha is amicable. Jacintha is unawed. If Ibby is amicable then Ibby is not altered. If Jacintha is altered and Jacintha is amicable then Jacintha is not tippy. If Ibby is not altered then Ibby is not sissified. Jacintha is unawed.", "logic": "\nAmicable(ibby)\nAmicable(jacintha)\nUnawed(jacintha)\nAmicable(ibby) -> not Altered(ibby)\nAltered(jacintha) and Amicable(jacintha) -> not Tippy(jacintha)\nnot Altered(ibby) -> not Sissified(ibby)\n\nUnawed(jacintha)\n\ntherefore Unawed(jacintha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Pamela is liplike. Marco is liplike. Marco is parasitic. If Pamela is liplike then Pamela is not exigent. If Marco is exigent and Marco is liplike then Marco is not colour. If Pamela is not exigent then Pamela is not acervate. Marco is not parasitic.", "logic": "\nLiplike(pamela)\nLiplike(marco)\nParasitic(marco)\nLiplike(pamela) -> not Exigent(pamela)\nExigent(marco) and Liplike(marco) -> not Colour(marco)\nnot Exigent(pamela) -> not Acervate(pamela)\n\nnot Parasitic(marco)\n\ntherefore Parasitic(marco)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Leighton is filmed. Carleigh is filmed. Carleigh is absolutist. If Leighton is filmed then Leighton is not saxatile. If Carleigh is saxatile and Carleigh is filmed then Carleigh is not sectional. If Leighton is not saxatile then Leighton is not unassured. Leighton is not saxatile.", "logic": "\nFilmed(leighton)\nFilmed(carleigh)\nAbsolutist(carleigh)\nFilmed(leighton) -> not Saxatile(leighton)\nSaxatile(carleigh) and Filmed(carleigh) -> not Sectional(carleigh)\nnot Saxatile(leighton) -> not Unassured(leighton)\n\nnot Saxatile(leighton)\n\nFilmed(leighton) and Filmed(leighton) -> not Saxatile(leighton) -> therefore not Saxatile(leighton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Erny is haired. Gertie is haired. Gertie is romany. If Erny is haired then Erny is not gingery. If Gertie is gingery and Gertie is haired then Gertie is not mothy. If Erny is not gingery then Erny is not ecumenic. Erny is gingery.", "logic": "\nHaired(erny)\nHaired(gertie)\nRomany(gertie)\nHaired(erny) -> not Gingery(erny)\nGingery(gertie) and Haired(gertie) -> not Mothy(gertie)\nnot Gingery(erny) -> not Ecumenic(erny)\n\nGingery(erny)\n\nHaired(erny) and Haired(erny) -> not Gingery(erny) -> therefore not Gingery(erny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Frieda is privileged. Jenelle is privileged. Jenelle is cerous. If Frieda is privileged then Frieda is not mercerised. If Jenelle is mercerised and Jenelle is privileged then Jenelle is not accessary. If Frieda is not mercerised then Frieda is not weird. Frieda is not weird.", "logic": "\nPrivileged(frieda)\nPrivileged(jenelle)\nCerous(jenelle)\nPrivileged(frieda) -> not Mercerised(frieda)\nMercerised(jenelle) and Privileged(jenelle) -> not Accessary(jenelle)\nnot Mercerised(frieda) -> not Weird(frieda)\n\nnot Weird(frieda)\n\nPrivileged(frieda) and Privileged(frieda) -> not Mercerised(frieda) -> therefore not Mercerised(frieda) not Mercerised(frieda) and not Mercerised(frieda) -> not Weird(frieda) -> therefore not Weird(frieda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Laird is forty. Frances is forty. Frances is pouched. If Laird is forty then Laird is not pseudo. If Frances is pseudo and Frances is forty then Frances is not unmanly. If Laird is not pseudo then Laird is not patronymic. Laird is patronymic.", "logic": "\nForty(laird)\nForty(frances)\nPouched(frances)\nForty(laird) -> not Pseudo(laird)\nPseudo(frances) and Forty(frances) -> not Unmanly(frances)\nnot Pseudo(laird) -> not Patronymic(laird)\n\nPatronymic(laird)\n\nForty(laird) and Forty(laird) -> not Pseudo(laird) -> therefore not Pseudo(laird) not Pseudo(laird) and not Pseudo(laird) -> not Patronymic(laird) -> therefore not Patronymic(laird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Clotilda is exothermal. Cornelius is exothermal. Cornelius is areolate. If Clotilda is exothermal then Clotilda is not conducive. If Cornelius is conducive and Cornelius is exothermal then Cornelius is not dulled. If Clotilda is not conducive then Clotilda is not broad. Clotilda is not areolate.", "logic": "\nExothermal(clotilda)\nExothermal(cornelius)\nAreolate(cornelius)\nExothermal(clotilda) -> not Conducive(clotilda)\nConducive(cornelius) and Exothermal(cornelius) -> not Dulled(cornelius)\nnot Conducive(clotilda) -> not Broad(clotilda)\n\nnot Areolate(clotilda)\n\nnot Areolate(clotilda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Flossi is cogitable. Rodolph is cogitable. Rodolph is ultimo. If Flossi is cogitable then Flossi is not grumose. If Rodolph is grumose and Rodolph is cogitable then Rodolph is not denotive. If Flossi is not grumose then Flossi is not grooved. Rodolph is grooved.", "logic": "\nCogitable(flossi)\nCogitable(rodolph)\nUltimo(rodolph)\nCogitable(flossi) -> not Grumose(flossi)\nGrumose(rodolph) and Cogitable(rodolph) -> not Denotive(rodolph)\nnot Grumose(flossi) -> not Grooved(flossi)\n\nGrooved(rodolph)\n\nGrooved(rodolph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Alley is diploid. Constancy is diploid. Constancy is chartreuse. If Alley is diploid then Alley is not metastable. If Constancy is metastable and Constancy is diploid then Constancy is not glomerular. If Alley is not metastable then Alley is not clement. Constancy is not rough.", "logic": "\nDiploid(alley)\nDiploid(constancy)\nChartreuse(constancy)\nDiploid(alley) -> not Metastable(alley)\nMetastable(constancy) and Diploid(constancy) -> not Glomerular(constancy)\nnot Metastable(alley) -> not Clement(alley)\n\nnot Rough(constancy)\n\nnot Rough(constancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Lory is windburnt. Vida is windburnt. Vida is dolomitic. If Lory is windburnt then Lory is not voiced. If Vida is voiced and Vida is windburnt then Vida is not thrillful. If Lory is not voiced then Lory is not achromatic. Lory is furry.", "logic": "\nWindburnt(lory)\nWindburnt(vida)\nDolomitic(vida)\nWindburnt(lory) -> not Voiced(lory)\nVoiced(vida) and Windburnt(vida) -> not Thrillful(vida)\nnot Voiced(lory) -> not Achromatic(lory)\n\nFurry(lory)\n\nFurry(lory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Twyla is relaxing. Jerald is relaxing. Jerald is abdicable. If Twyla is relaxing then Twyla is not cupular. If Jerald is cupular and Jerald is relaxing then Jerald is not bonkers. If Twyla is not cupular then Twyla is not vile. Jerald is not cupular.", "logic": "\nRelaxing(twyla)\nRelaxing(jerald)\nAbdicable(jerald)\nRelaxing(twyla) -> not Cupular(twyla)\nCupular(jerald) and Relaxing(jerald) -> not Bonkers(jerald)\nnot Cupular(twyla) -> not Vile(twyla)\n\nnot Cupular(jerald)\n\nnot Cupular(jerald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "Doug is eristic. Tremain is eristic. Tremain is improvable. If Doug is eristic then Doug is not acanthoid. If Tremain is acanthoid and Tremain is eristic then Tremain is not pilary. If Doug is not acanthoid then Doug is not disposable. Doug is pilary.", "logic": "\nEristic(doug)\nEristic(tremain)\nImprovable(tremain)\nEristic(doug) -> not Acanthoid(doug)\nAcanthoid(tremain) and Eristic(tremain) -> not Pilary(tremain)\nnot Acanthoid(doug) -> not Disposable(doug)\n\nPilary(doug)\n\nPilary(doug) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-579"} {"premises": "The meggie is eighteenth. Red, mirthless people are eighteenth. Nice people are stoneless. Green people are shitty. The meggie is eighteenth.", "logic": "\nEighteenth(meggie)\nforall x (Stoneless(x) and Mirthless(x) -> Eighteenth(x))\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Stoneless(x))\nforall x (Eighteenth(x) -> Shitty(x))\n\nEighteenth(meggie)\n\ntherefore Eighteenth(meggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The gilberte is endearing. Red, unopposed people are endearing. Nice people are tritanopic. Green people are lugubrious. The gilberte is not endearing.", "logic": "\nEndearing(gilberte)\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) and Unopposed(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Endearing(x) -> Lugubrious(x))\n\nnot Endearing(gilberte)\n\ntherefore Endearing(gilberte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The phyllida is plucked. Red, exogamic people are plucked. Nice people are matching. Green people are beaklike. The phyllida is beaklike.", "logic": "\nPlucked(phyllida)\nforall x (Matching(x) and Exogamic(x) -> Plucked(x))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Beaklike(x))\n\nBeaklike(phyllida)\n\nPlucked(phyllida) and forall x (Plucked(x) -> Beaklike(x)) -> therefore Beaklike(phyllida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The sheilah is cagey. Red, limbed people are cagey. Nice people are fusty. Green people are nodulated. The sheilah is not nodulated.", "logic": "\nCagey(sheilah)\nforall x (Fusty(x) and Limbed(x) -> Cagey(x))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Fusty(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) -> Nodulated(x))\n\nnot Nodulated(sheilah)\n\nCagey(sheilah) and forall x (Cagey(x) -> Nodulated(x)) -> therefore Nodulated(sheilah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The maybelle is loamy. Red, catenulate people are loamy. Nice people are romanic. Green people are devotional. The maybelle is romanic.", "logic": "\nLoamy(maybelle)\nforall x (Romanic(x) and Catenulate(x) -> Loamy(x))\nforall x (Devotional(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Devotional(x))\n\nRomanic(maybelle)\n\nLoamy(maybelle) and forall x (Loamy(x) -> Devotional(x)) -> therefore Devotional(maybelle) Devotional(maybelle) and forall x (Devotional(x) -> Romanic(x)) -> therefore Romanic(maybelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The rudolph is chimeric. Red, glial people are chimeric. Nice people are diachronic. Green people are acquired. The rudolph is not diachronic.", "logic": "\nChimeric(rudolph)\nforall x (Diachronic(x) and Glial(x) -> Chimeric(x))\nforall x (Acquired(x) -> Diachronic(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Acquired(x))\n\nnot Diachronic(rudolph)\n\nChimeric(rudolph) and forall x (Chimeric(x) -> Acquired(x)) -> therefore Acquired(rudolph) Acquired(rudolph) and forall x (Acquired(x) -> Diachronic(x)) -> therefore Diachronic(rudolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The rolando is clogging. Red, captivated people are clogging. Nice people are monetary. Green people are slavonic. The rolando does not visit the rolando.", "logic": "\nClogging(rolando)\nforall x (Monetary(x) and Captivated(x) -> Clogging(x))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) -> Monetary(x))\nforall x (Clogging(x) -> Slavonic(x))\n\nnot Visits(rolando, rolando)\n\nnot Visits(rolando, rolando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The ewan is tegular. Red, utterable people are tegular. Nice people are wordless. Green people are octagonal. The ewan is blue.", "logic": "\nTegular(ewan)\nforall x (Wordless(x) and Utterable(x) -> Tegular(x))\nforall x (Octagonal(x) -> Wordless(x))\nforall x (Tegular(x) -> Octagonal(x))\n\nBlue(ewan)\n\nBlue(ewan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The audy is prefab. Red, bigmouthed people are prefab. Nice people are inviolate. Green people are protecting. The audy does not like the audy.", "logic": "\nPrefab(audy)\nforall x (Inviolate(x) and Bigmouthed(x) -> Prefab(x))\nforall x (Protecting(x) -> Inviolate(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Protecting(x))\n\nnot Likes(audy, audy)\n\nnot Likes(audy, audy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "The jolynn is adonic. Red, upstair people are adonic. Nice people are maladroit. Green people are warming. The jolynn sees the jolynn.", "logic": "\nAdonic(jolynn)\nforall x (Maladroit(x) and Upstair(x) -> Adonic(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) -> Maladroit(x))\nforall x (Adonic(x) -> Warming(x))\n\nSees(jolynn, jolynn)\n\nSees(jolynn, jolynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-482"} {"premises": "Minny is fretted. Minny is altricial. Minny is extrusive. Minny is damaged. Minny is ecologic. Matt is handsome. Matt is damaged. All extrusive, fretted people are homicidal. If Minny is damaged and Minny is homicidal then Minny is handsome. Minny is extrusive.", "logic": "\nFretted(minny)\nAltricial(minny)\nExtrusive(minny)\nDamaged(minny)\nEcologic(minny)\nHandsome(matt)\nDamaged(matt)\nforall x (Extrusive(x) and Fretted(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nDamaged(minny) and Homicidal(minny) -> Handsome(minny)\n\nExtrusive(minny)\n\ntherefore Extrusive(minny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Barn is shaping. Barn is baltic. Barn is bitterish. Barn is salverform. Barn is mongol. Layne is raddled. Layne is salverform. All bitterish, shaping people are unlaureled. If Barn is salverform and Barn is unlaureled then Barn is raddled. Barn is not bitterish.", "logic": "\nShaping(barn)\nBaltic(barn)\nBitterish(barn)\nSalverform(barn)\nMongol(barn)\nRaddled(layne)\nSalverform(layne)\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and Shaping(x) -> Unlaureled(x))\nSalverform(barn) and Unlaureled(barn) -> Raddled(barn)\n\nnot Bitterish(barn)\n\ntherefore Bitterish(barn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Mollie is razed. Mollie is reasonable. Mollie is jelled. Mollie is motherlike. Mollie is vulpecular. Tresa is damn. Tresa is motherlike. All jelled, razed people are implicated. If Mollie is motherlike and Mollie is implicated then Mollie is damn. Mollie is implicated.", "logic": "\nRazed(mollie)\nReasonable(mollie)\nJelled(mollie)\nMotherlike(mollie)\nVulpecular(mollie)\nDamn(tresa)\nMotherlike(tresa)\nforall x (Jelled(x) and Razed(x) -> Implicated(x))\nMotherlike(mollie) and Implicated(mollie) -> Damn(mollie)\n\nImplicated(mollie)\n\nJelled(mollie) and Razed(mollie) and forall x (Jelled(x) and Razed(x) -> Implicated(x)) -> therefore Implicated(mollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Rusty is untimely. Rusty is bimotored. Rusty is totipotent. Rusty is affecting. Rusty is darling. Merna is chiseled. Merna is affecting. All totipotent, untimely people are anamorphic. If Rusty is affecting and Rusty is anamorphic then Rusty is chiseled. Rusty is not anamorphic.", "logic": "\nUntimely(rusty)\nBimotored(rusty)\nTotipotent(rusty)\nAffecting(rusty)\nDarling(rusty)\nChiseled(merna)\nAffecting(merna)\nforall x (Totipotent(x) and Untimely(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nAffecting(rusty) and Anamorphic(rusty) -> Chiseled(rusty)\n\nnot Anamorphic(rusty)\n\nTotipotent(rusty) and Untimely(rusty) and forall x (Totipotent(x) and Untimely(x) -> Anamorphic(x)) -> therefore Anamorphic(rusty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Nicola is debatable. Nicola is telescoped. Nicola is crustlike. Nicola is unembodied. Nicola is asthmatic. Ward is fizzy. Ward is unembodied. All crustlike, debatable people are transeunt. If Nicola is unembodied and Nicola is transeunt then Nicola is fizzy. Nicola is fizzy.", "logic": "\nDebatable(nicola)\nTelescoped(nicola)\nCrustlike(nicola)\nUnembodied(nicola)\nAsthmatic(nicola)\nFizzy(ward)\nUnembodied(ward)\nforall x (Crustlike(x) and Debatable(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nUnembodied(nicola) and Transeunt(nicola) -> Fizzy(nicola)\n\nFizzy(nicola)\n\nCrustlike(nicola) and Debatable(nicola) and forall x (Crustlike(x) and Debatable(x) -> Transeunt(x)) -> therefore Transeunt(nicola) Unembodied(nicola) and Transeunt(nicola) and Unembodied(nicola) and Transeunt(nicola) -> Fizzy(nicola) -> therefore Fizzy(nicola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Dafna is calyptrate. Dafna is sweetened. Dafna is logistic. Dafna is overaged. Dafna is unspecific. Rita is pedagogic. Rita is overaged. All logistic, calyptrate people are grand. If Dafna is overaged and Dafna is grand then Dafna is pedagogic. Dafna is not pedagogic.", "logic": "\nCalyptrate(dafna)\nSweetened(dafna)\nLogistic(dafna)\nOveraged(dafna)\nUnspecific(dafna)\nPedagogic(rita)\nOveraged(rita)\nforall x (Logistic(x) and Calyptrate(x) -> Grand(x))\nOveraged(dafna) and Grand(dafna) -> Pedagogic(dafna)\n\nnot Pedagogic(dafna)\n\nLogistic(dafna) and Calyptrate(dafna) and forall x (Logistic(x) and Calyptrate(x) -> Grand(x)) -> therefore Grand(dafna) Overaged(dafna) and Grand(dafna) and Overaged(dafna) and Grand(dafna) -> Pedagogic(dafna) -> therefore Pedagogic(dafna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Valerye is unreserved. Valerye is toughened. Valerye is waxlike. Valerye is bicornuate. Valerye is sunburnt. Fayette is spinous. Fayette is bicornuate. All waxlike, unreserved people are fooling. If Valerye is bicornuate and Valerye is fooling then Valerye is spinous. Fayette is not fooling.", "logic": "\nUnreserved(valerye)\nToughened(valerye)\nWaxlike(valerye)\nBicornuate(valerye)\nSunburnt(valerye)\nSpinous(fayette)\nBicornuate(fayette)\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and Unreserved(x) -> Fooling(x))\nBicornuate(valerye) and Fooling(valerye) -> Spinous(valerye)\n\nnot Fooling(fayette)\n\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and Unreserved(x) -> Fooling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Candra is champion. Candra is septal. Candra is unfueled. Candra is famed. Candra is enlivened. Osbert is unhearing. Osbert is famed. All unfueled, champion people are lactogenic. If Candra is famed and Candra is lactogenic then Candra is unhearing. Osbert is enlivened.", "logic": "\nChampion(candra)\nSeptal(candra)\nUnfueled(candra)\nFamed(candra)\nEnlivened(candra)\nUnhearing(osbert)\nFamed(osbert)\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and Champion(x) -> Lactogenic(x))\nFamed(candra) and Lactogenic(candra) -> Unhearing(candra)\n\nEnlivened(osbert)\n\nEnlivened(osbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Elspeth is saponified. Elspeth is mineral. Elspeth is votive. Elspeth is wearisome. Elspeth is faux. Hermon is unfree. Hermon is wearisome. All votive, saponified people are trivalent. If Elspeth is wearisome and Elspeth is trivalent then Elspeth is unfree. Hermon is not votive.", "logic": "\nSaponified(elspeth)\nMineral(elspeth)\nVotive(elspeth)\nWearisome(elspeth)\nFaux(elspeth)\nUnfree(hermon)\nWearisome(hermon)\nforall x (Votive(x) and Saponified(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nWearisome(elspeth) and Trivalent(elspeth) -> Unfree(elspeth)\n\nnot Votive(hermon)\n\nnot Votive(hermon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Trenton is baculiform. Trenton is unsaid. Trenton is hammy. Trenton is marvellous. Trenton is appointive. Corliss is jaggy. Corliss is marvellous. All hammy, baculiform people are uremic. If Trenton is marvellous and Trenton is uremic then Trenton is jaggy. Corliss is baculiform.", "logic": "\nBaculiform(trenton)\nUnsaid(trenton)\nHammy(trenton)\nMarvellous(trenton)\nAppointive(trenton)\nJaggy(corliss)\nMarvellous(corliss)\nforall x (Hammy(x) and Baculiform(x) -> Uremic(x))\nMarvellous(trenton) and Uremic(trenton) -> Jaggy(trenton)\n\nBaculiform(corliss)\n\nBaculiform(corliss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-153"} {"premises": "Arlyne is magenta. Rad is magenta. Rad is forlorn. Cold, forlorn people are appealing. If someone is appealing then they are isothermic. All appealing people are magenta. Arlyne is magenta.", "logic": "\nMagenta(arlyne)\nMagenta(rad)\nForlorn(rad)\nforall x (Magenta(x) and Forlorn(x) -> Appealing(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) -> Isothermic(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) -> Magenta(x))\n\nMagenta(arlyne)\n\ntherefore Magenta(arlyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Marietta is uninspired. Lloyd is uninspired. Lloyd is benevolent. Cold, benevolent people are bronchial. If someone is bronchial then they are opthalmic. All bronchial people are uninspired. Lloyd is not benevolent.", "logic": "\nUninspired(marietta)\nUninspired(lloyd)\nBenevolent(lloyd)\nforall x (Uninspired(x) and Benevolent(x) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Opthalmic(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Uninspired(x))\n\nnot Benevolent(lloyd)\n\ntherefore Benevolent(lloyd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Odele is matted. Darryl is matted. Darryl is coaxing. Cold, coaxing people are engraved. If someone is engraved then they are whirring. All engraved people are matted. Darryl is engraved.", "logic": "\nMatted(odele)\nMatted(darryl)\nCoaxing(darryl)\nforall x (Matted(x) and Coaxing(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Matted(x))\n\nEngraved(darryl)\n\nMatted(darryl) and Coaxing(darryl) and forall x (Matted(x) and Coaxing(x) -> Engraved(x)) -> therefore Engraved(darryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Thalia is multilevel. Corilla is multilevel. Corilla is hated. Cold, hated people are exposed. If someone is exposed then they are discreet. All exposed people are multilevel. Corilla is not exposed.", "logic": "\nMultilevel(thalia)\nMultilevel(corilla)\nHated(corilla)\nforall x (Multilevel(x) and Hated(x) -> Exposed(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> Discreet(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> Multilevel(x))\n\nnot Exposed(corilla)\n\nMultilevel(corilla) and Hated(corilla) and forall x (Multilevel(x) and Hated(x) -> Exposed(x)) -> therefore Exposed(corilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Lana is spendable. Clareta is spendable. Clareta is benzoic. Cold, benzoic people are sacked. If someone is sacked then they are rhombic. All sacked people are spendable. Clareta is rhombic.", "logic": "\nSpendable(lana)\nSpendable(clareta)\nBenzoic(clareta)\nforall x (Spendable(x) and Benzoic(x) -> Sacked(x))\nforall x (Sacked(x) -> Rhombic(x))\nforall x (Sacked(x) -> Spendable(x))\n\nRhombic(clareta)\n\nSpendable(clareta) and Benzoic(clareta) and forall x (Spendable(x) and Benzoic(x) -> Sacked(x)) -> therefore Sacked(clareta) Sacked(clareta) and forall x (Sacked(x) -> Rhombic(x)) -> therefore Rhombic(clareta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Aigneis is bolshy. Cobby is bolshy. Cobby is raisable. Cold, raisable people are checked. If someone is checked then they are muted. All checked people are bolshy. Cobby is not muted.", "logic": "\nBolshy(aigneis)\nBolshy(cobby)\nRaisable(cobby)\nforall x (Bolshy(x) and Raisable(x) -> Checked(x))\nforall x (Checked(x) -> Muted(x))\nforall x (Checked(x) -> Bolshy(x))\n\nnot Muted(cobby)\n\nBolshy(cobby) and Raisable(cobby) and forall x (Bolshy(x) and Raisable(x) -> Checked(x)) -> therefore Checked(cobby) Checked(cobby) and forall x (Checked(x) -> Muted(x)) -> therefore Muted(cobby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Mariana is articulate. Caritta is articulate. Caritta is etiologic. Cold, etiologic people are quenched. If someone is quenched then they are blowzy. All quenched people are articulate. Mariana is not quenched.", "logic": "\nArticulate(mariana)\nArticulate(caritta)\nEtiologic(caritta)\nforall x (Articulate(x) and Etiologic(x) -> Quenched(x))\nforall x (Quenched(x) -> Blowzy(x))\nforall x (Quenched(x) -> Articulate(x))\n\nnot Quenched(mariana)\n\nforall x (Articulate(x) and Etiologic(x) -> Quenched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Claudette is coroneted. Kriste is coroneted. Kriste is wizard. Cold, wizard people are stinky. If someone is stinky then they are staid. All stinky people are coroneted. Claudette is staid.", "logic": "\nCoroneted(claudette)\nCoroneted(kriste)\nWizard(kriste)\nforall x (Coroneted(x) and Wizard(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) -> Coroneted(x))\n\nStaid(claudette)\n\nforall x (Stinky(x) -> Staid(x)) <- forall x (Coroneted(x) and Wizard(x) -> Stinky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Emmanuel is hundred. Rustin is hundred. Rustin is blamable. Cold, blamable people are quantal. If someone is quantal then they are ascendable. All quantal people are hundred. Rustin is not rough.", "logic": "\nHundred(emmanuel)\nHundred(rustin)\nBlamable(rustin)\nforall x (Hundred(x) and Blamable(x) -> Quantal(x))\nforall x (Quantal(x) -> Ascendable(x))\nforall x (Quantal(x) -> Hundred(x))\n\nnot Rough(rustin)\n\nnot Rough(rustin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Fae is histologic. Alvera is histologic. Alvera is aphyllous. Cold, aphyllous people are cute. If someone is cute then they are ethical. All cute people are histologic. Fae is rough.", "logic": "\nHistologic(fae)\nHistologic(alvera)\nAphyllous(alvera)\nforall x (Histologic(x) and Aphyllous(x) -> Cute(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) -> Ethical(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) -> Histologic(x))\n\nRough(fae)\n\nRough(fae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Maryjane is dripless. Jorry is dripless. Jorry is aery. Cold, aery people are downtown. If someone is downtown then they are elect. All downtown people are dripless. Maryjane is not furry.", "logic": "\nDripless(maryjane)\nDripless(jorry)\nAery(jorry)\nforall x (Dripless(x) and Aery(x) -> Downtown(x))\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Elect(x))\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Dripless(x))\n\nnot Furry(maryjane)\n\nnot Furry(maryjane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "Sharron is plenteous. Tootsie is plenteous. Tootsie is relocated. Cold, relocated people are embonpoint. If someone is embonpoint then they are fraught. All embonpoint people are plenteous. Sharron is relocated.", "logic": "\nPlenteous(sharron)\nPlenteous(tootsie)\nRelocated(tootsie)\nforall x (Plenteous(x) and Relocated(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Fraught(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Plenteous(x))\n\nRelocated(sharron)\n\nRelocated(sharron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-914"} {"premises": "The allyn redo the gabriell. The gabriell point the erwin. The erwin is pharyngeal. The amelie point the erwin. If someone is jarring then they chase the erwin. If someone point the amelie then they do not need the allyn. If someone point the erwin then the erwin is unrefined. If the amelie does not like the erwin and the amelie does not like the gabriell then the erwin does not chase the gabriell. If the erwin is jarring then the erwin is pharyngeal. If someone unfrock the allyn and they are not mutagenic then they are jarring. If someone is jarring and they like the erwin then they need the gabriell. If someone is pharyngeal and unrefined then they need the amelie. The amelie point the erwin.", "logic": "\nRedo(allyn, gabriell)\nPoint(gabriell, erwin)\nPharyngeal(erwin)\nPoint(amelie, erwin)\nforall x (Jarring(x) -> Point(x, erwin))\nforall x (Point(x, amelie) -> not Unfrock(x, allyn))\nforall x (Point(x, erwin) -> Unrefined(erwin))\nnot Redo(amelie, erwin) and not Redo(amelie, gabriell) -> not Point(erwin, gabriell)\nJarring(erwin) -> Pharyngeal(erwin)\nforall x (Unfrock(x, allyn) and not Mutagenic(x) -> Jarring(x))\nforall x (Jarring(x) and Redo(x, erwin) -> Unfrock(x, gabriell))\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) and Unrefined(x) -> Unfrock(x, amelie))\n\nPoint(amelie, erwin)\n\ntherefore Point(amelie, erwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The marielle desire the leonelle. The leonelle prostrate the kai. The kai is katari. The britani prostrate the kai. If someone is mottled then they chase the kai. If someone prostrate the britani then they do not need the marielle. If someone prostrate the kai then the kai is rose. If the britani does not like the kai and the britani does not like the leonelle then the kai does not chase the leonelle. If the kai is mottled then the kai is katari. If someone speed the marielle and they are not unfunny then they are mottled. If someone is mottled and they like the kai then they need the leonelle. If someone is katari and rose then they need the britani. The leonelle does not chase the kai.", "logic": "\nDesire(marielle, leonelle)\nProstrate(leonelle, kai)\nKatari(kai)\nProstrate(britani, kai)\nforall x (Mottled(x) -> Prostrate(x, kai))\nforall x (Prostrate(x, britani) -> not Speed(x, marielle))\nforall x (Prostrate(x, kai) -> Rose(kai))\nnot Desire(britani, kai) and not Desire(britani, leonelle) -> not Prostrate(kai, leonelle)\nMottled(kai) -> Katari(kai)\nforall x (Speed(x, marielle) and not Unfunny(x) -> Mottled(x))\nforall x (Mottled(x) and Desire(x, kai) -> Speed(x, leonelle))\nforall x (Katari(x) and Rose(x) -> Speed(x, britani))\n\nnot Prostrate(leonelle, kai)\n\ntherefore Prostrate(leonelle, kai)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The sallie lower the maxi. The maxi freak the almira. The almira is seeable. The mabel freak the almira. If someone is sewed then they chase the almira. If someone freak the mabel then they do not need the sallie. If someone freak the almira then the almira is epochal. If the mabel does not like the almira and the mabel does not like the maxi then the almira does not chase the maxi. If the almira is sewed then the almira is seeable. If someone cark the sallie and they are not thin then they are sewed. If someone is sewed and they like the almira then they need the maxi. If someone is seeable and epochal then they need the mabel. The almira is epochal.", "logic": "\nLower(sallie, maxi)\nFreak(maxi, almira)\nSeeable(almira)\nFreak(mabel, almira)\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Freak(x, almira))\nforall x (Freak(x, mabel) -> not Cark(x, sallie))\nforall x (Freak(x, almira) -> Epochal(almira))\nnot Lower(mabel, almira) and not Lower(mabel, maxi) -> not Freak(almira, maxi)\nSewed(almira) -> Seeable(almira)\nforall x (Cark(x, sallie) and not Thin(x) -> Sewed(x))\nforall x (Sewed(x) and Lower(x, almira) -> Cark(x, maxi))\nforall x (Seeable(x) and Epochal(x) -> Cark(x, mabel))\n\nEpochal(almira)\n\nFreak(maxi, almira) and forall x (Freak(x, almira) -> Epochal(almira)) -> therefore Epochal(almira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The zollie rekindle the marena. The marena regroup the stefano. The stefano is indurate. The sammie regroup the stefano. If someone is chorionic then they chase the stefano. If someone regroup the sammie then they do not need the zollie. If someone regroup the stefano then the stefano is lumpen. If the sammie does not like the stefano and the sammie does not like the marena then the stefano does not chase the marena. If the stefano is chorionic then the stefano is indurate. If someone mortar the zollie and they are not uppish then they are chorionic. If someone is chorionic and they like the stefano then they need the marena. If someone is indurate and lumpen then they need the sammie. The stefano is not lumpen.", "logic": "\nRekindle(zollie, marena)\nRegroup(marena, stefano)\nIndurate(stefano)\nRegroup(sammie, stefano)\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Regroup(x, stefano))\nforall x (Regroup(x, sammie) -> not Mortar(x, zollie))\nforall x (Regroup(x, stefano) -> Lumpen(stefano))\nnot Rekindle(sammie, stefano) and not Rekindle(sammie, marena) -> not Regroup(stefano, marena)\nChorionic(stefano) -> Indurate(stefano)\nforall x (Mortar(x, zollie) and not Uppish(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) and Rekindle(x, stefano) -> Mortar(x, marena))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Lumpen(x) -> Mortar(x, sammie))\n\nnot Lumpen(stefano)\n\nRegroup(marena, stefano) and forall x (Regroup(x, stefano) -> Lumpen(stefano)) -> therefore Lumpen(stefano)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The chriss apologize the ame. The ame inform the jacques. The jacques is enchanting. The tera inform the jacques. If someone is bandaged then they chase the jacques. If someone inform the tera then they do not need the chriss. If someone inform the jacques then the jacques is piano. If the tera does not like the jacques and the tera does not like the ame then the jacques does not chase the ame. If the jacques is bandaged then the jacques is enchanting. If someone paralyse the chriss and they are not outright then they are bandaged. If someone is bandaged and they like the jacques then they need the ame. If someone is enchanting and piano then they need the tera. The jacques paralyse the tera.", "logic": "\nApologize(chriss, ame)\nInform(ame, jacques)\nEnchanting(jacques)\nInform(tera, jacques)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Inform(x, jacques))\nforall x (Inform(x, tera) -> not Paralyse(x, chriss))\nforall x (Inform(x, jacques) -> Piano(jacques))\nnot Apologize(tera, jacques) and not Apologize(tera, ame) -> not Inform(jacques, ame)\nBandaged(jacques) -> Enchanting(jacques)\nforall x (Paralyse(x, chriss) and not Outright(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) and Apologize(x, jacques) -> Paralyse(x, ame))\nforall x (Enchanting(x) and Piano(x) -> Paralyse(x, tera))\n\nParalyse(jacques, tera)\n\nInform(ame, jacques) and forall x (Inform(x, jacques) -> Piano(jacques)) -> therefore Piano(jacques) Enchanting(jacques) and Piano(jacques) and forall x (Enchanting(x) and Piano(x) -> Paralyse(x, tera)) -> therefore Paralyse(jacques, tera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The kate beard the berkley. The berkley jingle the georges. The georges is gimcrack. The lavina jingle the georges. If someone is cetacean then they chase the georges. If someone jingle the lavina then they do not need the kate. If someone jingle the georges then the georges is overlooked. If the lavina does not like the georges and the lavina does not like the berkley then the georges does not chase the berkley. If the georges is cetacean then the georges is gimcrack. If someone hunger the kate and they are not extant then they are cetacean. If someone is cetacean and they like the georges then they need the berkley. If someone is gimcrack and overlooked then they need the lavina. The georges does not need the lavina.", "logic": "\nBeard(kate, berkley)\nJingle(berkley, georges)\nGimcrack(georges)\nJingle(lavina, georges)\nforall x (Cetacean(x) -> Jingle(x, georges))\nforall x (Jingle(x, lavina) -> not Hunger(x, kate))\nforall x (Jingle(x, georges) -> Overlooked(georges))\nnot Beard(lavina, georges) and not Beard(lavina, berkley) -> not Jingle(georges, berkley)\nCetacean(georges) -> Gimcrack(georges)\nforall x (Hunger(x, kate) and not Extant(x) -> Cetacean(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) and Beard(x, georges) -> Hunger(x, berkley))\nforall x (Gimcrack(x) and Overlooked(x) -> Hunger(x, lavina))\n\nnot Hunger(georges, lavina)\n\nJingle(berkley, georges) and forall x (Jingle(x, georges) -> Overlooked(georges)) -> therefore Overlooked(georges) Gimcrack(georges) and Overlooked(georges) and forall x (Gimcrack(x) and Overlooked(x) -> Hunger(x, lavina)) -> therefore Hunger(georges, lavina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The stefano wither the ethan. The ethan entwine the naoma. The naoma is mozartian. The siegfried entwine the naoma. If someone is cuspidal then they chase the naoma. If someone entwine the siegfried then they do not need the stefano. If someone entwine the naoma then the naoma is pendent. If the siegfried does not like the naoma and the siegfried does not like the ethan then the naoma does not chase the ethan. If the naoma is cuspidal then the naoma is mozartian. If someone slam the stefano and they are not evanescent then they are cuspidal. If someone is cuspidal and they like the naoma then they need the ethan. If someone is mozartian and pendent then they need the siegfried. The siegfried does not need the siegfried.", "logic": "\nWither(stefano, ethan)\nEntwine(ethan, naoma)\nMozartian(naoma)\nEntwine(siegfried, naoma)\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) -> Entwine(x, naoma))\nforall x (Entwine(x, siegfried) -> not Slam(x, stefano))\nforall x (Entwine(x, naoma) -> Pendent(naoma))\nnot Wither(siegfried, naoma) and not Wither(siegfried, ethan) -> not Entwine(naoma, ethan)\nCuspidal(naoma) -> Mozartian(naoma)\nforall x (Slam(x, stefano) and not Evanescent(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Wither(x, naoma) -> Slam(x, ethan))\nforall x (Mozartian(x) and Pendent(x) -> Slam(x, siegfried))\n\nnot Slam(siegfried, siegfried)\n\nforall x (Mozartian(x) and Pendent(x) -> Slam(x, siegfried)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The sullivan lope the stillman. The stillman unthaw the hana. The hana is pedigree. The raymond unthaw the hana. If someone is dramatic then they chase the hana. If someone unthaw the raymond then they do not need the sullivan. If someone unthaw the hana then the hana is functional. If the raymond does not like the hana and the raymond does not like the stillman then the hana does not chase the stillman. If the hana is dramatic then the hana is pedigree. If someone compile the sullivan and they are not ageless then they are dramatic. If someone is dramatic and they like the hana then they need the stillman. If someone is pedigree and functional then they need the raymond. The raymond is dramatic.", "logic": "\nLope(sullivan, stillman)\nUnthaw(stillman, hana)\nPedigree(hana)\nUnthaw(raymond, hana)\nforall x (Dramatic(x) -> Unthaw(x, hana))\nforall x (Unthaw(x, raymond) -> not Compile(x, sullivan))\nforall x (Unthaw(x, hana) -> Functional(hana))\nnot Lope(raymond, hana) and not Lope(raymond, stillman) -> not Unthaw(hana, stillman)\nDramatic(hana) -> Pedigree(hana)\nforall x (Compile(x, sullivan) and not Ageless(x) -> Dramatic(x))\nforall x (Dramatic(x) and Lope(x, hana) -> Compile(x, stillman))\nforall x (Pedigree(x) and Functional(x) -> Compile(x, raymond))\n\nDramatic(raymond)\n\nforall x (Compile(x, sullivan) and not Ageless(x) -> Dramatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The nathanial deplumate the corny. The corny felt the tomlin. The tomlin is antsy. The bartlet felt the tomlin. If someone is epicene then they chase the tomlin. If someone felt the bartlet then they do not need the nathanial. If someone felt the tomlin then the tomlin is geodetic. If the bartlet does not like the tomlin and the bartlet does not like the corny then the tomlin does not chase the corny. If the tomlin is epicene then the tomlin is antsy. If someone demonize the nathanial and they are not irritating then they are epicene. If someone is epicene and they like the tomlin then they need the corny. If someone is antsy and geodetic then they need the bartlet. The nathanial is not epicene.", "logic": "\nDeplumate(nathanial, corny)\nFelt(corny, tomlin)\nAntsy(tomlin)\nFelt(bartlet, tomlin)\nforall x (Epicene(x) -> Felt(x, tomlin))\nforall x (Felt(x, bartlet) -> not Demonize(x, nathanial))\nforall x (Felt(x, tomlin) -> Geodetic(tomlin))\nnot Deplumate(bartlet, tomlin) and not Deplumate(bartlet, corny) -> not Felt(tomlin, corny)\nEpicene(tomlin) -> Antsy(tomlin)\nforall x (Demonize(x, nathanial) and not Irritating(x) -> Epicene(x))\nforall x (Epicene(x) and Deplumate(x, tomlin) -> Demonize(x, corny))\nforall x (Antsy(x) and Geodetic(x) -> Demonize(x, bartlet))\n\nnot Epicene(nathanial)\n\nforall x (Demonize(x, nathanial) and not Irritating(x) -> Epicene(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The emmalee lampoon the annmaria. The annmaria trade the danie. The danie is unusable. The loren trade the danie. If someone is giddy then they chase the danie. If someone trade the loren then they do not need the emmalee. If someone trade the danie then the danie is split. If the loren does not like the danie and the loren does not like the annmaria then the danie does not chase the annmaria. If the danie is giddy then the danie is unusable. If someone minify the emmalee and they are not perky then they are giddy. If someone is giddy and they like the danie then they need the annmaria. If someone is unusable and split then they need the loren. The loren lampoon the emmalee.", "logic": "\nLampoon(emmalee, annmaria)\nTrade(annmaria, danie)\nUnusable(danie)\nTrade(loren, danie)\nforall x (Giddy(x) -> Trade(x, danie))\nforall x (Trade(x, loren) -> not Minify(x, emmalee))\nforall x (Trade(x, danie) -> Split(danie))\nnot Lampoon(loren, danie) and not Lampoon(loren, annmaria) -> not Trade(danie, annmaria)\nGiddy(danie) -> Unusable(danie)\nforall x (Minify(x, emmalee) and not Perky(x) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Giddy(x) and Lampoon(x, danie) -> Minify(x, annmaria))\nforall x (Unusable(x) and Split(x) -> Minify(x, loren))\n\nLampoon(loren, emmalee)\n\nLampoon(loren, emmalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The christof assonate the roddie. The roddie intend the mario. The mario is eristic. The trula intend the mario. If someone is whatever then they chase the mario. If someone intend the trula then they do not need the christof. If someone intend the mario then the mario is cretaceous. If the trula does not like the mario and the trula does not like the roddie then the mario does not chase the roddie. If the mario is whatever then the mario is eristic. If someone sieve the christof and they are not merging then they are whatever. If someone is whatever and they like the mario then they need the roddie. If someone is eristic and cretaceous then they need the trula. The mario does not need the christof.", "logic": "\nAssonate(christof, roddie)\nIntend(roddie, mario)\nEristic(mario)\nIntend(trula, mario)\nforall x (Whatever(x) -> Intend(x, mario))\nforall x (Intend(x, trula) -> not Sieve(x, christof))\nforall x (Intend(x, mario) -> Cretaceous(mario))\nnot Assonate(trula, mario) and not Assonate(trula, roddie) -> not Intend(mario, roddie)\nWhatever(mario) -> Eristic(mario)\nforall x (Sieve(x, christof) and not Merging(x) -> Whatever(x))\nforall x (Whatever(x) and Assonate(x, mario) -> Sieve(x, roddie))\nforall x (Eristic(x) and Cretaceous(x) -> Sieve(x, trula))\n\nnot Sieve(mario, christof)\n\nnot Sieve(mario, christof) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "The broderick corral the saxon. The saxon further the miguel. The miguel is hesperian. The velvet further the miguel. If someone is memberless then they chase the miguel. If someone further the velvet then they do not need the broderick. If someone further the miguel then the miguel is gamy. If the velvet does not like the miguel and the velvet does not like the saxon then the miguel does not chase the saxon. If the miguel is memberless then the miguel is hesperian. If someone swear the broderick and they are not jilted then they are memberless. If someone is memberless and they like the miguel then they need the saxon. If someone is hesperian and gamy then they need the velvet. The saxon is gamy.", "logic": "\nCorral(broderick, saxon)\nFurther(saxon, miguel)\nHesperian(miguel)\nFurther(velvet, miguel)\nforall x (Memberless(x) -> Further(x, miguel))\nforall x (Further(x, velvet) -> not Swear(x, broderick))\nforall x (Further(x, miguel) -> Gamy(miguel))\nnot Corral(velvet, miguel) and not Corral(velvet, saxon) -> not Further(miguel, saxon)\nMemberless(miguel) -> Hesperian(miguel)\nforall x (Swear(x, broderick) and not Jilted(x) -> Memberless(x))\nforall x (Memberless(x) and Corral(x, miguel) -> Swear(x, saxon))\nforall x (Hesperian(x) and Gamy(x) -> Swear(x, velvet))\n\nGamy(saxon)\n\nGamy(saxon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-367"} {"premises": "Lory is wellborn. Cacilia is not just. Alexine is ostensive. If Alexine is ostensive then Alexine is wellborn. White people are slow. Lory is wellborn.", "logic": "\nWellborn(lory)\nnot Just(cacilia)\nOstensive(alexine)\nOstensive(alexine) -> Wellborn(alexine)\nforall x (Wellborn(x) -> Slow(x))\n\nWellborn(lory)\n\ntherefore Wellborn(lory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Blakeley is negative. Colette is not unfeeling. Elvis is recumbent. If Elvis is recumbent then Elvis is negative. White people are quintuple. Elvis is not recumbent.", "logic": "\nNegative(blakeley)\nnot Unfeeling(colette)\nRecumbent(elvis)\nRecumbent(elvis) -> Negative(elvis)\nforall x (Negative(x) -> Quintuple(x))\n\nnot Recumbent(elvis)\n\ntherefore Recumbent(elvis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Jeanette is whole. Eilis is not mesmeric. Whit is neoplastic. If Whit is neoplastic then Whit is whole. White people are groundless. Jeanette is groundless.", "logic": "\nWhole(jeanette)\nnot Mesmeric(eilis)\nNeoplastic(whit)\nNeoplastic(whit) -> Whole(whit)\nforall x (Whole(x) -> Groundless(x))\n\nGroundless(jeanette)\n\nWhole(jeanette) and forall x (Whole(x) -> Groundless(x)) -> therefore Groundless(jeanette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Oleg is seditious. Zilvia is not excitatory. Carmon is affixed. If Carmon is affixed then Carmon is seditious. White people are medullated. Oleg is not medullated.", "logic": "\nSeditious(oleg)\nnot Excitatory(zilvia)\nAffixed(carmon)\nAffixed(carmon) -> Seditious(carmon)\nforall x (Seditious(x) -> Medullated(x))\n\nnot Medullated(oleg)\n\nSeditious(oleg) and forall x (Seditious(x) -> Medullated(x)) -> therefore Medullated(oleg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Kare is dismal. Sayer is not sown. Sully is credited. If Sully is credited then Sully is dismal. White people are unloving. Sully is unloving.", "logic": "\nDismal(kare)\nnot Sown(sayer)\nCredited(sully)\nCredited(sully) -> Dismal(sully)\nforall x (Dismal(x) -> Unloving(x))\n\nUnloving(sully)\n\nCredited(sully) and Credited(sully) -> Dismal(sully) -> therefore Dismal(sully) Dismal(sully) and forall x (Dismal(x) -> Unloving(x)) -> therefore Unloving(sully)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Truman is alarmed. Cornela is not unploughed. Harv is tantamount. If Harv is tantamount then Harv is alarmed. White people are netlike. Harv is not netlike.", "logic": "\nAlarmed(truman)\nnot Unploughed(cornela)\nTantamount(harv)\nTantamount(harv) -> Alarmed(harv)\nforall x (Alarmed(x) -> Netlike(x))\n\nnot Netlike(harv)\n\nTantamount(harv) and Tantamount(harv) -> Alarmed(harv) -> therefore Alarmed(harv) Alarmed(harv) and forall x (Alarmed(x) -> Netlike(x)) -> therefore Netlike(harv)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Linzy is nightly. Hewitt is not prolonged. Dionne is bichrome. If Dionne is bichrome then Dionne is nightly. White people are salverform. Hewitt is not salverform.", "logic": "\nNightly(linzy)\nnot Prolonged(hewitt)\nBichrome(dionne)\nBichrome(dionne) -> Nightly(dionne)\nforall x (Nightly(x) -> Salverform(x))\n\nnot Salverform(hewitt)\n\nforall x (Nightly(x) -> Salverform(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Poppy is desegrated. Franklin is not malodorous. Conchita is current. If Conchita is current then Conchita is desegrated. White people are vigesimal. Poppy is red.", "logic": "\nDesegrated(poppy)\nnot Malodorous(franklin)\nCurrent(conchita)\nCurrent(conchita) -> Desegrated(conchita)\nforall x (Desegrated(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\n\nRed(poppy)\n\nRed(poppy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Anni is terse. Gusty is not fitful. Davita is mutilated. If Davita is mutilated then Davita is terse. White people are searing. Gusty is not red.", "logic": "\nTerse(anni)\nnot Fitful(gusty)\nMutilated(davita)\nMutilated(davita) -> Terse(davita)\nforall x (Terse(x) -> Searing(x))\n\nnot Red(gusty)\n\nnot Red(gusty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Rodolph is syndetic. Jeana is not individual. Hamlin is unoriginal. If Hamlin is unoriginal then Hamlin is syndetic. White people are surprised. Jeana is syndetic.", "logic": "\nSyndetic(rodolph)\nnot Individual(jeana)\nUnoriginal(hamlin)\nUnoriginal(hamlin) -> Syndetic(hamlin)\nforall x (Syndetic(x) -> Surprised(x))\n\nSyndetic(jeana)\n\nSyndetic(jeana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Kimberly is poor. Anstice is not sapphirine. Eunice is enthralled. If Eunice is enthralled then Eunice is poor. White people are adjustable. Anstice is not young.", "logic": "\nPoor(kimberly)\nnot Sapphirine(anstice)\nEnthralled(eunice)\nEnthralled(eunice) -> Poor(eunice)\nforall x (Poor(x) -> Adjustable(x))\n\nnot Young(anstice)\n\nnot Young(anstice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Nanete is insulting. Sean is not copesetic. Victoria is beaded. If Victoria is beaded then Victoria is insulting. White people are sensorial. Nanete is copesetic.", "logic": "\nInsulting(nanete)\nnot Copesetic(sean)\nBeaded(victoria)\nBeaded(victoria) -> Insulting(victoria)\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Sensorial(x))\n\nCopesetic(nanete)\n\nCopesetic(nanete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Renaud is not unpriestly. Renaud is shaky. Renaud is sprightly. Renaud is techy. Renaud is manorial. Cindie is surmounted. Cindie is sprightly. Cindie is not techy. Liliane is unpriestly. Liliane is techy. Liliane is pyrolignic. Liliane is manorial. Iris is surmounted. Iris is not unpriestly. Iris is not shaky. Iris is techy. All techy, shaky things are manorial. If Cindie is surmounted and Cindie is sprightly then Cindie is unpriestly. If Renaud is manorial and Renaud is not unpriestly then Renaud is sprightly. All unpriestly things are pyrolignic. All surmounted things are sprightly. Round, unpriestly things are surmounted. Liliane is unpriestly.", "logic": "\nnot Unpriestly(renaud)\nShaky(renaud)\nSprightly(renaud)\nTechy(renaud)\nManorial(renaud)\nSurmounted(cindie)\nSprightly(cindie)\nnot Techy(cindie)\nUnpriestly(liliane)\nTechy(liliane)\nPyrolignic(liliane)\nManorial(liliane)\nSurmounted(iris)\nnot Unpriestly(iris)\nnot Shaky(iris)\nTechy(iris)\nforall x (Techy(x) and Shaky(x) -> Manorial(x))\nSurmounted(cindie) and Sprightly(cindie) -> Unpriestly(cindie)\nManorial(renaud) and not Unpriestly(renaud) -> Sprightly(renaud)\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) -> Sprightly(x))\nforall x (Techy(x) and Unpriestly(x) -> Surmounted(x))\n\nUnpriestly(liliane)\n\ntherefore Unpriestly(liliane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Meaghan is not sinful. Meaghan is bituminoid. Meaghan is parous. Meaghan is patent. Meaghan is hermitical. Loretta is dependable. Loretta is parous. Loretta is not patent. Rosella is sinful. Rosella is patent. Rosella is imaginable. Rosella is hermitical. Louise is dependable. Louise is not sinful. Louise is not bituminoid. Louise is patent. All patent, bituminoid things are hermitical. If Loretta is dependable and Loretta is parous then Loretta is sinful. If Meaghan is hermitical and Meaghan is not sinful then Meaghan is parous. All sinful things are imaginable. All dependable things are parous. Round, sinful things are dependable. Meaghan is sinful.", "logic": "\nnot Sinful(meaghan)\nBituminoid(meaghan)\nParous(meaghan)\nPatent(meaghan)\nHermitical(meaghan)\nDependable(loretta)\nParous(loretta)\nnot Patent(loretta)\nSinful(rosella)\nPatent(rosella)\nImaginable(rosella)\nHermitical(rosella)\nDependable(louise)\nnot Sinful(louise)\nnot Bituminoid(louise)\nPatent(louise)\nforall x (Patent(x) and Bituminoid(x) -> Hermitical(x))\nDependable(loretta) and Parous(loretta) -> Sinful(loretta)\nHermitical(meaghan) and not Sinful(meaghan) -> Parous(meaghan)\nforall x (Sinful(x) -> Imaginable(x))\nforall x (Dependable(x) -> Parous(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) and Sinful(x) -> Dependable(x))\n\nSinful(meaghan)\n\ntherefore not Sinful(meaghan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Marieann is not tough. Marieann is wrinkly. Marieann is revertible. Marieann is eastern. Marieann is recherche. Ephrayim is imbricate. Ephrayim is revertible. Ephrayim is not eastern. Marcelo is tough. Marcelo is eastern. Marcelo is barrelled. Marcelo is recherche. Nalani is imbricate. Nalani is not tough. Nalani is not wrinkly. Nalani is eastern. All eastern, wrinkly things are recherche. If Ephrayim is imbricate and Ephrayim is revertible then Ephrayim is tough. If Marieann is recherche and Marieann is not tough then Marieann is revertible. All tough things are barrelled. All imbricate things are revertible. Round, tough things are imbricate. Nalani is revertible.", "logic": "\nnot Tough(marieann)\nWrinkly(marieann)\nRevertible(marieann)\nEastern(marieann)\nRecherche(marieann)\nImbricate(ephrayim)\nRevertible(ephrayim)\nnot Eastern(ephrayim)\nTough(marcelo)\nEastern(marcelo)\nBarrelled(marcelo)\nRecherche(marcelo)\nImbricate(nalani)\nnot Tough(nalani)\nnot Wrinkly(nalani)\nEastern(nalani)\nforall x (Eastern(x) and Wrinkly(x) -> Recherche(x))\nImbricate(ephrayim) and Revertible(ephrayim) -> Tough(ephrayim)\nRecherche(marieann) and not Tough(marieann) -> Revertible(marieann)\nforall x (Tough(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nforall x (Imbricate(x) -> Revertible(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) and Tough(x) -> Imbricate(x))\n\nRevertible(nalani)\n\nImbricate(nalani) and forall x (Imbricate(x) -> Revertible(x)) -> therefore Revertible(nalani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Elmore is not homesick. Elmore is handelian. Elmore is million. Elmore is creedal. Elmore is atrial. Ernest is winded. Ernest is million. Ernest is not creedal. Davis is homesick. Davis is creedal. Davis is feeble. Davis is atrial. Brier is winded. Brier is not homesick. Brier is not handelian. Brier is creedal. All creedal, handelian things are atrial. If Ernest is winded and Ernest is million then Ernest is homesick. If Elmore is atrial and Elmore is not homesick then Elmore is million. All homesick things are feeble. All winded things are million. Round, homesick things are winded. Davis is not winded.", "logic": "\nnot Homesick(elmore)\nHandelian(elmore)\nMillion(elmore)\nCreedal(elmore)\nAtrial(elmore)\nWinded(ernest)\nMillion(ernest)\nnot Creedal(ernest)\nHomesick(davis)\nCreedal(davis)\nFeeble(davis)\nAtrial(davis)\nWinded(brier)\nnot Homesick(brier)\nnot Handelian(brier)\nCreedal(brier)\nforall x (Creedal(x) and Handelian(x) -> Atrial(x))\nWinded(ernest) and Million(ernest) -> Homesick(ernest)\nAtrial(elmore) and not Homesick(elmore) -> Million(elmore)\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Feeble(x))\nforall x (Winded(x) -> Million(x))\nforall x (Creedal(x) and Homesick(x) -> Winded(x))\n\nnot Winded(davis)\n\nCreedal(davis) and Homesick(davis) and forall x (Creedal(x) and Homesick(x) -> Winded(x)) -> therefore Winded(davis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Colette is not palmlike. Colette is ensuing. Colette is diagonal. Colette is vertebrate. Colette is grievous. Odin is grammatic. Odin is diagonal. Odin is not vertebrate. Gael is palmlike. Gael is vertebrate. Gael is cuban. Gael is grievous. Dabney is grammatic. Dabney is not palmlike. Dabney is not ensuing. Dabney is vertebrate. All vertebrate, ensuing things are grievous. If Odin is grammatic and Odin is diagonal then Odin is palmlike. If Colette is grievous and Colette is not palmlike then Colette is diagonal. All palmlike things are cuban. All grammatic things are diagonal. Round, palmlike things are grammatic. Gael is diagonal.", "logic": "\nnot Palmlike(colette)\nEnsuing(colette)\nDiagonal(colette)\nVertebrate(colette)\nGrievous(colette)\nGrammatic(odin)\nDiagonal(odin)\nnot Vertebrate(odin)\nPalmlike(gael)\nVertebrate(gael)\nCuban(gael)\nGrievous(gael)\nGrammatic(dabney)\nnot Palmlike(dabney)\nnot Ensuing(dabney)\nVertebrate(dabney)\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) and Ensuing(x) -> Grievous(x))\nGrammatic(odin) and Diagonal(odin) -> Palmlike(odin)\nGrievous(colette) and not Palmlike(colette) -> Diagonal(colette)\nforall x (Palmlike(x) -> Cuban(x))\nforall x (Grammatic(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) and Palmlike(x) -> Grammatic(x))\n\nDiagonal(gael)\n\nVertebrate(gael) and Palmlike(gael) and forall x (Vertebrate(x) and Palmlike(x) -> Grammatic(x)) -> therefore Grammatic(gael) Grammatic(gael) and forall x (Grammatic(x) -> Diagonal(x)) -> therefore Diagonal(gael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Herby is not extrinsic. Herby is expendable. Herby is distorted. Herby is unspoken. Herby is portable. Ritch is recurring. Ritch is distorted. Ritch is not unspoken. Chelsey is extrinsic. Chelsey is unspoken. Chelsey is spotty. Chelsey is portable. Loretta is recurring. Loretta is not extrinsic. Loretta is not expendable. Loretta is unspoken. All unspoken, expendable things are portable. If Ritch is recurring and Ritch is distorted then Ritch is extrinsic. If Herby is portable and Herby is not extrinsic then Herby is distorted. All extrinsic things are spotty. All recurring things are distorted. Round, extrinsic things are recurring. Ritch is not spotty.", "logic": "\nnot Extrinsic(herby)\nExpendable(herby)\nDistorted(herby)\nUnspoken(herby)\nPortable(herby)\nRecurring(ritch)\nDistorted(ritch)\nnot Unspoken(ritch)\nExtrinsic(chelsey)\nUnspoken(chelsey)\nSpotty(chelsey)\nPortable(chelsey)\nRecurring(loretta)\nnot Extrinsic(loretta)\nnot Expendable(loretta)\nUnspoken(loretta)\nforall x (Unspoken(x) and Expendable(x) -> Portable(x))\nRecurring(ritch) and Distorted(ritch) -> Extrinsic(ritch)\nPortable(herby) and not Extrinsic(herby) -> Distorted(herby)\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Spotty(x))\nforall x (Recurring(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Unspoken(x) and Extrinsic(x) -> Recurring(x))\n\nnot Spotty(ritch)\n\nRecurring(ritch) and Distorted(ritch) and Recurring(ritch) and Distorted(ritch) -> Extrinsic(ritch) -> therefore Extrinsic(ritch) Extrinsic(ritch) and forall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Spotty(x)) -> therefore Spotty(ritch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Florette is not floury. Florette is hadal. Florette is italic. Florette is customary. Florette is sardinian. Therine is flammable. Therine is italic. Therine is not customary. Aleks is floury. Aleks is customary. Aleks is chaffy. Aleks is sardinian. Phineas is flammable. Phineas is not floury. Phineas is not hadal. Phineas is customary. All customary, hadal things are sardinian. If Therine is flammable and Therine is italic then Therine is floury. If Florette is sardinian and Florette is not floury then Florette is italic. All floury things are chaffy. All flammable things are italic. Round, floury things are flammable. Phineas is not sardinian.", "logic": "\nnot Floury(florette)\nHadal(florette)\nItalic(florette)\nCustomary(florette)\nSardinian(florette)\nFlammable(therine)\nItalic(therine)\nnot Customary(therine)\nFloury(aleks)\nCustomary(aleks)\nChaffy(aleks)\nSardinian(aleks)\nFlammable(phineas)\nnot Floury(phineas)\nnot Hadal(phineas)\nCustomary(phineas)\nforall x (Customary(x) and Hadal(x) -> Sardinian(x))\nFlammable(therine) and Italic(therine) -> Floury(therine)\nSardinian(florette) and not Floury(florette) -> Italic(florette)\nforall x (Floury(x) -> Chaffy(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Italic(x))\nforall x (Customary(x) and Floury(x) -> Flammable(x))\n\nnot Sardinian(phineas)\n\nforall x (Customary(x) and Hadal(x) -> Sardinian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Benson is not known. Benson is soulless. Benson is stuffed. Benson is unstuck. Benson is uninspired. Ford is unshadowed. Ford is stuffed. Ford is not unstuck. Whitby is known. Whitby is unstuck. Whitby is weakened. Whitby is uninspired. Cordey is unshadowed. Cordey is not known. Cordey is not soulless. Cordey is unstuck. All unstuck, soulless things are uninspired. If Ford is unshadowed and Ford is stuffed then Ford is known. If Benson is uninspired and Benson is not known then Benson is stuffed. All known things are weakened. All unshadowed things are stuffed. Round, known things are unshadowed. Ford is uninspired.", "logic": "\nnot Known(benson)\nSoulless(benson)\nStuffed(benson)\nUnstuck(benson)\nUninspired(benson)\nUnshadowed(ford)\nStuffed(ford)\nnot Unstuck(ford)\nKnown(whitby)\nUnstuck(whitby)\nWeakened(whitby)\nUninspired(whitby)\nUnshadowed(cordey)\nnot Known(cordey)\nnot Soulless(cordey)\nUnstuck(cordey)\nforall x (Unstuck(x) and Soulless(x) -> Uninspired(x))\nUnshadowed(ford) and Stuffed(ford) -> Known(ford)\nUninspired(benson) and not Known(benson) -> Stuffed(benson)\nforall x (Known(x) -> Weakened(x))\nforall x (Unshadowed(x) -> Stuffed(x))\nforall x (Unstuck(x) and Known(x) -> Unshadowed(x))\n\nUninspired(ford)\n\nforall x (Unstuck(x) and Soulless(x) -> Uninspired(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Sylvia is not churchly. Sylvia is intruding. Sylvia is mitral. Sylvia is allotropic. Sylvia is tickling. Matthias is threatened. Matthias is mitral. Matthias is not allotropic. Coletta is churchly. Coletta is allotropic. Coletta is vendable. Coletta is tickling. David is threatened. David is not churchly. David is not intruding. David is allotropic. All allotropic, intruding things are tickling. If Matthias is threatened and Matthias is mitral then Matthias is churchly. If Sylvia is tickling and Sylvia is not churchly then Sylvia is mitral. All churchly things are vendable. All threatened things are mitral. Round, churchly things are threatened. David is not vendable.", "logic": "\nnot Churchly(sylvia)\nIntruding(sylvia)\nMitral(sylvia)\nAllotropic(sylvia)\nTickling(sylvia)\nThreatened(matthias)\nMitral(matthias)\nnot Allotropic(matthias)\nChurchly(coletta)\nAllotropic(coletta)\nVendable(coletta)\nTickling(coletta)\nThreatened(david)\nnot Churchly(david)\nnot Intruding(david)\nAllotropic(david)\nforall x (Allotropic(x) and Intruding(x) -> Tickling(x))\nThreatened(matthias) and Mitral(matthias) -> Churchly(matthias)\nTickling(sylvia) and not Churchly(sylvia) -> Mitral(sylvia)\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Vendable(x))\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Allotropic(x) and Churchly(x) -> Threatened(x))\n\nnot Vendable(david)\n\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Vendable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "Wallace is not unpaved. Wallace is apposite. Wallace is umptieth. Wallace is phlegmatic. Wallace is pleonastic. Gilli is saltlike. Gilli is umptieth. Gilli is not phlegmatic. Catherin is unpaved. Catherin is phlegmatic. Catherin is heinous. Catherin is pleonastic. Mitchael is saltlike. Mitchael is not unpaved. Mitchael is not apposite. Mitchael is phlegmatic. All phlegmatic, apposite things are pleonastic. If Gilli is saltlike and Gilli is umptieth then Gilli is unpaved. If Wallace is pleonastic and Wallace is not unpaved then Wallace is umptieth. All unpaved things are heinous. All saltlike things are umptieth. Round, unpaved things are saltlike. Gilli is apposite.", "logic": "\nnot Unpaved(wallace)\nApposite(wallace)\nUmptieth(wallace)\nPhlegmatic(wallace)\nPleonastic(wallace)\nSaltlike(gilli)\nUmptieth(gilli)\nnot Phlegmatic(gilli)\nUnpaved(catherin)\nPhlegmatic(catherin)\nHeinous(catherin)\nPleonastic(catherin)\nSaltlike(mitchael)\nnot Unpaved(mitchael)\nnot Apposite(mitchael)\nPhlegmatic(mitchael)\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) and Apposite(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nSaltlike(gilli) and Umptieth(gilli) -> Unpaved(gilli)\nPleonastic(wallace) and not Unpaved(wallace) -> Umptieth(wallace)\nforall x (Unpaved(x) -> Heinous(x))\nforall x (Saltlike(x) -> Umptieth(x))\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) and Unpaved(x) -> Saltlike(x))\n\nApposite(gilli)\n\nApposite(gilli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-823"} {"premises": "The bridget is generous. The bridget is umbilical. The bridget is cuspate. If the bridget is admirable and the bridget is not umbilical then the bridget is cuspate. If the bridget is piteous then the bridget is cuspate. All admirable things are not piteous. All cuspate things are generous. If something is umbilical then it is generous. Kind things are admirable. The bridget is cuspate.", "logic": "\nGenerous(bridget)\nUmbilical(bridget)\nCuspate(bridget)\nAdmirable(bridget) and not Umbilical(bridget) -> Cuspate(bridget)\nPiteous(bridget) -> Cuspate(bridget)\nforall x (Admirable(x) -> not Piteous(x))\nforall x (Cuspate(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Umbilical(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) -> Admirable(x))\n\nCuspate(bridget)\n\ntherefore Cuspate(bridget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "The kimmy is tracheal. The kimmy is tenth. The kimmy is side. If the kimmy is rousing and the kimmy is not tenth then the kimmy is side. If the kimmy is knockabout then the kimmy is side. All rousing things are not knockabout. All side things are tracheal. If something is tenth then it is tracheal. Kind things are rousing. The kimmy is not tracheal.", "logic": "\nTracheal(kimmy)\nTenth(kimmy)\nSide(kimmy)\nRousing(kimmy) and not Tenth(kimmy) -> Side(kimmy)\nKnockabout(kimmy) -> Side(kimmy)\nforall x (Rousing(x) -> not Knockabout(x))\nforall x (Side(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nforall x (Tracheal(x) -> Rousing(x))\n\nnot Tracheal(kimmy)\n\ntherefore Tracheal(kimmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "The ole is typic. The ole is comestible. The ole is centered. If the ole is borated and the ole is not comestible then the ole is centered. If the ole is earlier then the ole is centered. All borated things are not earlier. All centered things are typic. If something is comestible then it is typic. Kind things are borated. The ole is borated.", "logic": "\nTypic(ole)\nComestible(ole)\nCentered(ole)\nBorated(ole) and not Comestible(ole) -> Centered(ole)\nEarlier(ole) -> Centered(ole)\nforall x (Borated(x) -> not Earlier(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Typic(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Typic(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) -> Borated(x))\n\nBorated(ole)\n\nTypic(ole) and forall x (Typic(x) -> Borated(x)) -> therefore Borated(ole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "The timmy is tailored. The timmy is diclinous. The timmy is ongoing. If the timmy is hypnotic and the timmy is not diclinous then the timmy is ongoing. If the timmy is paintable then the timmy is ongoing. All hypnotic things are not paintable. All ongoing things are tailored. If something is diclinous then it is tailored. Kind things are hypnotic. The timmy is not hypnotic.", "logic": "\nTailored(timmy)\nDiclinous(timmy)\nOngoing(timmy)\nHypnotic(timmy) and not Diclinous(timmy) -> Ongoing(timmy)\nPaintable(timmy) -> Ongoing(timmy)\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> not Paintable(x))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Tailored(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\n\nnot Hypnotic(timmy)\n\nTailored(timmy) and forall x (Tailored(x) -> Hypnotic(x)) -> therefore Hypnotic(timmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "The florenza is ebony. The florenza is torrid. The florenza is bowfront. If the florenza is assailable and the florenza is not torrid then the florenza is bowfront. If the florenza is remiss then the florenza is bowfront. All assailable things are not remiss. All bowfront things are ebony. If something is torrid then it is ebony. Kind things are assailable. The florenza is not remiss.", "logic": "\nEbony(florenza)\nTorrid(florenza)\nBowfront(florenza)\nAssailable(florenza) and not Torrid(florenza) -> Bowfront(florenza)\nRemiss(florenza) -> Bowfront(florenza)\nforall x (Assailable(x) -> not Remiss(x))\nforall x (Bowfront(x) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Torrid(x) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Ebony(x) -> Assailable(x))\n\nnot Remiss(florenza)\n\nEbony(florenza) and forall x (Ebony(x) -> Assailable(x)) -> therefore Assailable(florenza) Assailable(florenza) and forall x (Assailable(x) -> not Remiss(x)) -> therefore not Remiss(florenza)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "The horst is reformed. The horst is persian. The horst is subject. If the horst is riblike and the horst is not persian then the horst is subject. If the horst is streaky then the horst is subject. All riblike things are not streaky. All subject things are reformed. If something is persian then it is reformed. Kind things are riblike. The horst is streaky.", "logic": "\nReformed(horst)\nPersian(horst)\nSubject(horst)\nRiblike(horst) and not Persian(horst) -> Subject(horst)\nStreaky(horst) -> Subject(horst)\nforall x (Riblike(x) -> not Streaky(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Reformed(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) -> Reformed(x))\nforall x (Reformed(x) -> Riblike(x))\n\nStreaky(horst)\n\nReformed(horst) and forall x (Reformed(x) -> Riblike(x)) -> therefore Riblike(horst) Riblike(horst) and forall x (Riblike(x) -> not Streaky(x)) -> therefore not Streaky(horst)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "The somerset is lightsome. The somerset is silklike. The somerset is adamant. If the somerset is icteric and the somerset is not silklike then the somerset is adamant. If the somerset is actionable then the somerset is adamant. All icteric things are not actionable. All adamant things are lightsome. If something is silklike then it is lightsome. Kind things are icteric. The somerset does not visit the somerset.", "logic": "\nLightsome(somerset)\nSilklike(somerset)\nAdamant(somerset)\nIcteric(somerset) and not Silklike(somerset) -> Adamant(somerset)\nActionable(somerset) -> Adamant(somerset)\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> not Actionable(x))\nforall x (Adamant(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Silklike(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) -> Icteric(x))\n\nnot Visits(somerset, somerset)\n\nnot Visits(somerset, somerset) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "The jean is sylphlike. The jean is wistful. The jean is expedient. If the jean is receptive and the jean is not wistful then the jean is expedient. If the jean is quantized then the jean is expedient. All receptive things are not quantized. All expedient things are sylphlike. If something is wistful then it is sylphlike. Kind things are receptive. The jean chases the jean.", "logic": "\nSylphlike(jean)\nWistful(jean)\nExpedient(jean)\nReceptive(jean) and not Wistful(jean) -> Expedient(jean)\nQuantized(jean) -> Expedient(jean)\nforall x (Receptive(x) -> not Quantized(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) -> Sylphlike(x))\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Sylphlike(x))\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) -> Receptive(x))\n\nChases(jean, jean)\n\nChases(jean, jean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-998"} {"premises": "Siobhan is toilsome. Siobhan is patented. Siobhan is unsolved. If something is supernal and ascending then it is patented. If something is ascending then it is unsolved. Blue, supernal things are swarthy. If something is toilsome and swinging then it is patented. If something is toilsome then it is swinging. All swarthy things are ascending. All patented, toilsome things are supernal. All unsolved, supernal things are swarthy. Siobhan is unsolved.", "logic": "\nToilsome(siobhan)\nPatented(siobhan)\nUnsolved(siobhan)\nforall x (Supernal(x) and Ascending(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) -> Unsolved(x))\nforall x (Swinging(x) and Supernal(x) -> Swarthy(x))\nforall x (Toilsome(x) and Swinging(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Toilsome(x) -> Swinging(x))\nforall x (Swarthy(x) -> Ascending(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) and Toilsome(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Unsolved(x) and Supernal(x) -> Swarthy(x))\n\nUnsolved(siobhan)\n\ntherefore Unsolved(siobhan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Grata is expansible. Grata is meagerly. Grata is spiderlike. If something is malawian and flatbottom then it is meagerly. If something is flatbottom then it is spiderlike. Blue, malawian things are scratchy. If something is expansible and phonologic then it is meagerly. If something is expansible then it is phonologic. All scratchy things are flatbottom. All meagerly, expansible things are malawian. All spiderlike, malawian things are scratchy. Grata is not meagerly.", "logic": "\nExpansible(grata)\nMeagerly(grata)\nSpiderlike(grata)\nforall x (Malawian(x) and Flatbottom(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) -> Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Phonologic(x) and Malawian(x) -> Scratchy(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) and Phonologic(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Phonologic(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\nforall x (Meagerly(x) and Expansible(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) and Malawian(x) -> Scratchy(x))\n\nnot Meagerly(grata)\n\ntherefore Meagerly(grata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Kalvin is spoilable. Kalvin is boozy. Kalvin is rubbery. If something is disgusting and leisurely then it is boozy. If something is leisurely then it is rubbery. Blue, disgusting things are schizoid. If something is spoilable and well then it is boozy. If something is spoilable then it is well. All schizoid things are leisurely. All boozy, spoilable things are disgusting. All rubbery, disgusting things are schizoid. Kalvin is well.", "logic": "\nSpoilable(kalvin)\nBoozy(kalvin)\nRubbery(kalvin)\nforall x (Disgusting(x) and Leisurely(x) -> Boozy(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Well(x) and Disgusting(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) and Well(x) -> Boozy(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Well(x))\nforall x (Schizoid(x) -> Leisurely(x))\nforall x (Boozy(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Disgusting(x))\nforall x (Rubbery(x) and Disgusting(x) -> Schizoid(x))\n\nWell(kalvin)\n\nSpoilable(kalvin) and forall x (Spoilable(x) -> Well(x)) -> therefore Well(kalvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Roselyn is destroyed. Roselyn is customary. Roselyn is colorfast. If something is plentiful and accurst then it is customary. If something is accurst then it is colorfast. Blue, plentiful things are methodist. If something is destroyed and adverse then it is customary. If something is destroyed then it is adverse. All methodist things are accurst. All customary, destroyed things are plentiful. All colorfast, plentiful things are methodist. Roselyn is not adverse.", "logic": "\nDestroyed(roselyn)\nCustomary(roselyn)\nColorfast(roselyn)\nforall x (Plentiful(x) and Accurst(x) -> Customary(x))\nforall x (Accurst(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Methodist(x))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) and Adverse(x) -> Customary(x))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) -> Adverse(x))\nforall x (Methodist(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Customary(x) and Destroyed(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Methodist(x))\n\nnot Adverse(roselyn)\n\nDestroyed(roselyn) and forall x (Destroyed(x) -> Adverse(x)) -> therefore Adverse(roselyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Merril is untidy. Merril is sensitive. Merril is totemic. If something is cardboard and unabated then it is sensitive. If something is unabated then it is totemic. Blue, cardboard things are feverous. If something is untidy and setose then it is sensitive. If something is untidy then it is setose. All feverous things are unabated. All sensitive, untidy things are cardboard. All totemic, cardboard things are feverous. Merril is feverous.", "logic": "\nUntidy(merril)\nSensitive(merril)\nTotemic(merril)\nforall x (Cardboard(x) and Unabated(x) -> Sensitive(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> Totemic(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Feverous(x))\nforall x (Untidy(x) and Setose(x) -> Sensitive(x))\nforall x (Untidy(x) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Feverous(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Sensitive(x) and Untidy(x) -> Cardboard(x))\nforall x (Totemic(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Feverous(x))\n\nFeverous(merril)\n\nSensitive(merril) and Untidy(merril) and forall x (Sensitive(x) and Untidy(x) -> Cardboard(x)) -> therefore Cardboard(merril) Totemic(merril) and Cardboard(merril) and forall x (Totemic(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Feverous(x)) -> therefore Feverous(merril)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Perceval is buccal. Perceval is unchained. Perceval is flagitious. If something is warning and elective then it is unchained. If something is elective then it is flagitious. Blue, warning things are honorable. If something is buccal and beardless then it is unchained. If something is buccal then it is beardless. All honorable things are elective. All unchained, buccal things are warning. All flagitious, warning things are honorable. Perceval is not honorable.", "logic": "\nBuccal(perceval)\nUnchained(perceval)\nFlagitious(perceval)\nforall x (Warning(x) and Elective(x) -> Unchained(x))\nforall x (Elective(x) -> Flagitious(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) and Warning(x) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Buccal(x) and Beardless(x) -> Unchained(x))\nforall x (Buccal(x) -> Beardless(x))\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Elective(x))\nforall x (Unchained(x) and Buccal(x) -> Warning(x))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) and Warning(x) -> Honorable(x))\n\nnot Honorable(perceval)\n\nUnchained(perceval) and Buccal(perceval) and forall x (Unchained(x) and Buccal(x) -> Warning(x)) -> therefore Warning(perceval) Flagitious(perceval) and Warning(perceval) and forall x (Flagitious(x) and Warning(x) -> Honorable(x)) -> therefore Honorable(perceval)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1820"} {"premises": "Agretha is dianoetic. Marcia is cordate. Marcia is dianoetic. If something is pitiable then it is dianoetic. If Marcia is dianoetic then Marcia is befogged. If something is befogged and gusty then it is viral. If something is cordate and dianoetic then it is oriented. Cold, befogged things are dianoetic. If Agretha is cordate and Agretha is oriented then Agretha is pitiable. All pitiable, cordate things are befogged. If something is cordate and oriented then it is gusty. Agretha is dianoetic.", "logic": "\nDianoetic(agretha)\nCordate(marcia)\nDianoetic(marcia)\nforall x (Pitiable(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\nDianoetic(marcia) -> Befogged(marcia)\nforall x (Befogged(x) and Gusty(x) -> Viral(x))\nforall x (Cordate(x) and Dianoetic(x) -> Oriented(x))\nforall x (Cordate(x) and Befogged(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\nCordate(agretha) and Oriented(agretha) -> Pitiable(agretha)\nforall x (Pitiable(x) and Cordate(x) -> Befogged(x))\nforall x (Cordate(x) and Oriented(x) -> Gusty(x))\n\nDianoetic(agretha)\n\ntherefore Dianoetic(agretha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Skelly is confutable. Puff is kitschy. Puff is confutable. If something is central then it is confutable. If Puff is confutable then Puff is dizzy. If something is dizzy and split then it is seismal. If something is kitschy and confutable then it is hangdog. Cold, dizzy things are confutable. If Skelly is kitschy and Skelly is hangdog then Skelly is central. All central, kitschy things are dizzy. If something is kitschy and hangdog then it is split. Puff is not confutable.", "logic": "\nConfutable(skelly)\nKitschy(puff)\nConfutable(puff)\nforall x (Central(x) -> Confutable(x))\nConfutable(puff) -> Dizzy(puff)\nforall x (Dizzy(x) and Split(x) -> Seismal(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Confutable(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Dizzy(x) -> Confutable(x))\nKitschy(skelly) and Hangdog(skelly) -> Central(skelly)\nforall x (Central(x) and Kitschy(x) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Hangdog(x) -> Split(x))\n\nnot Confutable(puff)\n\ntherefore Confutable(puff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Guinevere is pleonastic. Rosmunda is confident. Rosmunda is pleonastic. If something is baric then it is pleonastic. If Rosmunda is pleonastic then Rosmunda is stimulant. If something is stimulant and xanthous then it is modernized. If something is confident and pleonastic then it is adynamic. Cold, stimulant things are pleonastic. If Guinevere is confident and Guinevere is adynamic then Guinevere is baric. All baric, confident things are stimulant. If something is confident and adynamic then it is xanthous. Rosmunda is adynamic.", "logic": "\nPleonastic(guinevere)\nConfident(rosmunda)\nPleonastic(rosmunda)\nforall x (Baric(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nPleonastic(rosmunda) -> Stimulant(rosmunda)\nforall x (Stimulant(x) and Xanthous(x) -> Modernized(x))\nforall x (Confident(x) and Pleonastic(x) -> Adynamic(x))\nforall x (Confident(x) and Stimulant(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nConfident(guinevere) and Adynamic(guinevere) -> Baric(guinevere)\nforall x (Baric(x) and Confident(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nforall x (Confident(x) and Adynamic(x) -> Xanthous(x))\n\nAdynamic(rosmunda)\n\nConfident(rosmunda) and Pleonastic(rosmunda) and forall x (Confident(x) and Pleonastic(x) -> Adynamic(x)) -> therefore Adynamic(rosmunda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Rosemary is pentagonal. Hillary is recoilless. Hillary is pentagonal. If something is amnionic then it is pentagonal. If Hillary is pentagonal then Hillary is teal. If something is teal and engrossed then it is prakritic. If something is recoilless and pentagonal then it is aetiologic. Cold, teal things are pentagonal. If Rosemary is recoilless and Rosemary is aetiologic then Rosemary is amnionic. All amnionic, recoilless things are teal. If something is recoilless and aetiologic then it is engrossed. Hillary is not teal.", "logic": "\nPentagonal(rosemary)\nRecoilless(hillary)\nPentagonal(hillary)\nforall x (Amnionic(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nPentagonal(hillary) -> Teal(hillary)\nforall x (Teal(x) and Engrossed(x) -> Prakritic(x))\nforall x (Recoilless(x) and Pentagonal(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Recoilless(x) and Teal(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nRecoilless(rosemary) and Aetiologic(rosemary) -> Amnionic(rosemary)\nforall x (Amnionic(x) and Recoilless(x) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Recoilless(x) and Aetiologic(x) -> Engrossed(x))\n\nnot Teal(hillary)\n\nPentagonal(hillary) and Pentagonal(hillary) -> Teal(hillary) -> therefore Teal(hillary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Pamela is ugandan. Nora is jaundiced. Nora is ugandan. If something is cousinly then it is ugandan. If Nora is ugandan then Nora is nonskid. If something is nonskid and parochial then it is thoughtful. If something is jaundiced and ugandan then it is warty. Cold, nonskid things are ugandan. If Pamela is jaundiced and Pamela is warty then Pamela is cousinly. All cousinly, jaundiced things are nonskid. If something is jaundiced and warty then it is parochial. Nora is parochial.", "logic": "\nUgandan(pamela)\nJaundiced(nora)\nUgandan(nora)\nforall x (Cousinly(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nUgandan(nora) -> Nonskid(nora)\nforall x (Nonskid(x) and Parochial(x) -> Thoughtful(x))\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) and Ugandan(x) -> Warty(x))\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) and Nonskid(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nJaundiced(pamela) and Warty(pamela) -> Cousinly(pamela)\nforall x (Cousinly(x) and Jaundiced(x) -> Nonskid(x))\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) and Warty(x) -> Parochial(x))\n\nParochial(nora)\n\nJaundiced(nora) and Ugandan(nora) and forall x (Jaundiced(x) and Ugandan(x) -> Warty(x)) -> therefore Warty(nora) Jaundiced(nora) and Warty(nora) and forall x (Jaundiced(x) and Warty(x) -> Parochial(x)) -> therefore Parochial(nora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Salem is germanic. Wylma is sinhalese. Wylma is germanic. If something is balzacian then it is germanic. If Wylma is germanic then Wylma is stemmed. If something is stemmed and ungeared then it is unbarred. If something is sinhalese and germanic then it is seeable. Cold, stemmed things are germanic. If Salem is sinhalese and Salem is seeable then Salem is balzacian. All balzacian, sinhalese things are stemmed. If something is sinhalese and seeable then it is ungeared. Wylma is not ungeared.", "logic": "\nGermanic(salem)\nSinhalese(wylma)\nGermanic(wylma)\nforall x (Balzacian(x) -> Germanic(x))\nGermanic(wylma) -> Stemmed(wylma)\nforall x (Stemmed(x) and Ungeared(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Germanic(x) -> Seeable(x))\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Stemmed(x) -> Germanic(x))\nSinhalese(salem) and Seeable(salem) -> Balzacian(salem)\nforall x (Balzacian(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Seeable(x) -> Ungeared(x))\n\nnot Ungeared(wylma)\n\nSinhalese(wylma) and Germanic(wylma) and forall x (Sinhalese(x) and Germanic(x) -> Seeable(x)) -> therefore Seeable(wylma) Sinhalese(wylma) and Seeable(wylma) and forall x (Sinhalese(x) and Seeable(x) -> Ungeared(x)) -> therefore Ungeared(wylma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Costa is imbricated. Larissa is pernicious. Larissa is imbricated. If something is leased then it is imbricated. If Larissa is imbricated then Larissa is baseborn. If something is baseborn and malarial then it is extensile. If something is pernicious and imbricated then it is riled. Cold, baseborn things are imbricated. If Costa is pernicious and Costa is riled then Costa is leased. All leased, pernicious things are baseborn. If something is pernicious and riled then it is malarial. Costa is not malarial.", "logic": "\nImbricated(costa)\nPernicious(larissa)\nImbricated(larissa)\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Imbricated(x))\nImbricated(larissa) -> Baseborn(larissa)\nforall x (Baseborn(x) and Malarial(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Imbricated(x) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Baseborn(x) -> Imbricated(x))\nPernicious(costa) and Riled(costa) -> Leased(costa)\nforall x (Leased(x) and Pernicious(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Riled(x) -> Malarial(x))\n\nnot Malarial(costa)\n\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Riled(x) -> Malarial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Georgina is dotted. Jordana is purulent. Jordana is dotted. If something is couchant then it is dotted. If Jordana is dotted then Jordana is dimorphic. If something is dimorphic and unwarmed then it is promising. If something is purulent and dotted then it is pharaonic. Cold, dimorphic things are dotted. If Georgina is purulent and Georgina is pharaonic then Georgina is couchant. All couchant, purulent things are dimorphic. If something is purulent and pharaonic then it is unwarmed. Georgina is dimorphic.", "logic": "\nDotted(georgina)\nPurulent(jordana)\nDotted(jordana)\nforall x (Couchant(x) -> Dotted(x))\nDotted(jordana) -> Dimorphic(jordana)\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and Unwarmed(x) -> Promising(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Dotted(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Dimorphic(x) -> Dotted(x))\nPurulent(georgina) and Pharaonic(georgina) -> Couchant(georgina)\nforall x (Couchant(x) and Purulent(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Pharaonic(x) -> Unwarmed(x))\n\nDimorphic(georgina)\n\nforall x (Couchant(x) and Purulent(x) -> Dimorphic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Jenette is cursive. Meaghan is trashy. Meaghan is cursive. If something is xxviii then it is cursive. If Meaghan is cursive then Meaghan is canicular. If something is canicular and concentric then it is pocketable. If something is trashy and cursive then it is sacculated. Cold, canicular things are cursive. If Jenette is trashy and Jenette is sacculated then Jenette is xxviii. All xxviii, trashy things are canicular. If something is trashy and sacculated then it is concentric. Jenette is not xxviii.", "logic": "\nCursive(jenette)\nTrashy(meaghan)\nCursive(meaghan)\nforall x (Xxviii(x) -> Cursive(x))\nCursive(meaghan) -> Canicular(meaghan)\nforall x (Canicular(x) and Concentric(x) -> Pocketable(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) and Cursive(x) -> Sacculated(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) and Canicular(x) -> Cursive(x))\nTrashy(jenette) and Sacculated(jenette) -> Xxviii(jenette)\nforall x (Xxviii(x) and Trashy(x) -> Canicular(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) and Sacculated(x) -> Concentric(x))\n\nnot Xxviii(jenette)\n\nTrashy(jenette) and Sacculated(jenette) -> Xxviii(jenette) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Chandra is clawlike. Abigael is leibnizian. Abigael is clawlike. If something is fastidious then it is clawlike. If Abigael is clawlike then Abigael is organismal. If something is organismal and nonchalant then it is otherwise. If something is leibnizian and clawlike then it is deficient. Cold, organismal things are clawlike. If Chandra is leibnizian and Chandra is deficient then Chandra is fastidious. All fastidious, leibnizian things are organismal. If something is leibnizian and deficient then it is nonchalant. Chandra is leibnizian.", "logic": "\nClawlike(chandra)\nLeibnizian(abigael)\nClawlike(abigael)\nforall x (Fastidious(x) -> Clawlike(x))\nClawlike(abigael) -> Organismal(abigael)\nforall x (Organismal(x) and Nonchalant(x) -> Otherwise(x))\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) and Clawlike(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) and Organismal(x) -> Clawlike(x))\nLeibnizian(chandra) and Deficient(chandra) -> Fastidious(chandra)\nforall x (Fastidious(x) and Leibnizian(x) -> Organismal(x))\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) and Deficient(x) -> Nonchalant(x))\n\nLeibnizian(chandra)\n\nLeibnizian(chandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Mark is wintry. All combatant people are not gripping. Quiet people are polyhedral. If someone is polyhedral then they are not arteriolar. Mark is wintry.", "logic": "\nWintry(mark)\nforall x (Combatant(x) -> not Gripping(x))\nforall x (Wintry(x) -> Polyhedral(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> not Arteriolar(x))\n\nWintry(mark)\n\ntherefore Wintry(mark)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Reza is unilateral. All libyan people are not pebbly. Quiet people are supplicant. If someone is supplicant then they are not localized. Reza is not unilateral.", "logic": "\nUnilateral(reza)\nforall x (Libyan(x) -> not Pebbly(x))\nforall x (Unilateral(x) -> Supplicant(x))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) -> not Localized(x))\n\nnot Unilateral(reza)\n\ntherefore Unilateral(reza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Cherin is unlovely. All allotted people are not endermic. Quiet people are lifelike. If someone is lifelike then they are not corrected. Cherin is lifelike.", "logic": "\nUnlovely(cherin)\nforall x (Allotted(x) -> not Endermic(x))\nforall x (Unlovely(x) -> Lifelike(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> not Corrected(x))\n\nLifelike(cherin)\n\nUnlovely(cherin) and forall x (Unlovely(x) -> Lifelike(x)) -> therefore Lifelike(cherin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Mitzi is perfect. All elusive people are not eatable. Quiet people are productive. If someone is productive then they are not minus. Mitzi is not productive.", "logic": "\nPerfect(mitzi)\nforall x (Elusive(x) -> not Eatable(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) -> Productive(x))\nforall x (Productive(x) -> not Minus(x))\n\nnot Productive(mitzi)\n\nPerfect(mitzi) and forall x (Perfect(x) -> Productive(x)) -> therefore Productive(mitzi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Marty is tinkly. All umpteen people are not fistulate. Quiet people are quadrate. If someone is quadrate then they are not deckled. Marty is not deckled.", "logic": "\nTinkly(marty)\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> not Fistulate(x))\nforall x (Tinkly(x) -> Quadrate(x))\nforall x (Quadrate(x) -> not Deckled(x))\n\nnot Deckled(marty)\n\nTinkly(marty) and forall x (Tinkly(x) -> Quadrate(x)) -> therefore Quadrate(marty) Quadrate(marty) and forall x (Quadrate(x) -> not Deckled(x)) -> therefore not Deckled(marty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Kameko is aerobic. All negotiable people are not prepupal. Quiet people are unpeopled. If someone is unpeopled then they are not fluent. Kameko is fluent.", "logic": "\nAerobic(kameko)\nforall x (Negotiable(x) -> not Prepupal(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Unpeopled(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) -> not Fluent(x))\n\nFluent(kameko)\n\nAerobic(kameko) and forall x (Aerobic(x) -> Unpeopled(x)) -> therefore Unpeopled(kameko) Unpeopled(kameko) and forall x (Unpeopled(x) -> not Fluent(x)) -> therefore not Fluent(kameko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Kare is maniacal. All affinal people are not expensive. Quiet people are innovative. If someone is innovative then they are not puny. Kare is not expensive.", "logic": "\nManiacal(kare)\nforall x (Affinal(x) -> not Expensive(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Innovative(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) -> not Puny(x))\n\nnot Expensive(kare)\n\nnot Expensive(kare) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Trula is augustan. All efficient people are not showery. Quiet people are starlike. If someone is starlike then they are not vulvar. Trula is round.", "logic": "\nAugustan(trula)\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> not Showery(x))\nforall x (Augustan(x) -> Starlike(x))\nforall x (Starlike(x) -> not Vulvar(x))\n\nRound(trula)\n\nRound(trula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Hilton is pedal. All lugubrious people are not denudate. Quiet people are cherished. If someone is cherished then they are not clarion. Hilton is not young.", "logic": "\nPedal(hilton)\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> not Denudate(x))\nforall x (Pedal(x) -> Cherished(x))\nforall x (Cherished(x) -> not Clarion(x))\n\nnot Young(hilton)\n\nnot Young(hilton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Zed is rummy. All costly people are not loving. Quiet people are jazzy. If someone is jazzy then they are not mawkish. Zed is costly.", "logic": "\nRummy(zed)\nforall x (Costly(x) -> not Loving(x))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Jazzy(x))\nforall x (Jazzy(x) -> not Mawkish(x))\n\nCostly(zed)\n\nCostly(zed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-865"} {"premises": "Ramonda is eldest. Ramonda is pentagonal. Ramonda is inodorous. Ramonda is mellowed. Ramonda is explicable. Else is eldest. Else is pussy. Else is pentagonal. Else is inodorous. Else is vinegary. Else is mellowed. Else is explicable. If Else is pentagonal and Else is vinegary then Else is eldest. If something is explicable then it is vinegary. If Ramonda is mellowed then Ramonda is eldest. If something is vinegary and pentagonal then it is pussy. All vinegary things are explicable. Smart, pussy things are pentagonal. Blue things are vinegary. Green, mellowed things are inodorous. Else is eldest.", "logic": "\nEldest(ramonda)\nPentagonal(ramonda)\nInodorous(ramonda)\nMellowed(ramonda)\nExplicable(ramonda)\nEldest(else)\nPussy(else)\nPentagonal(else)\nInodorous(else)\nVinegary(else)\nMellowed(else)\nExplicable(else)\nPentagonal(else) and Vinegary(else) -> Eldest(else)\nforall x (Explicable(x) -> Vinegary(x))\nMellowed(ramonda) -> Eldest(ramonda)\nforall x (Vinegary(x) and Pentagonal(x) -> Pussy(x))\nforall x (Vinegary(x) -> Explicable(x))\nforall x (Mellowed(x) and Pussy(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Eldest(x) -> Vinegary(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) and Mellowed(x) -> Inodorous(x))\n\nEldest(else)\n\ntherefore Eldest(else)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1504"} {"premises": "Roberta is propulsive. Roberta is enteric. Roberta is licenced. Roberta is anecdotal. Roberta is inutile. Ahmet is propulsive. Ahmet is cuprous. Ahmet is enteric. Ahmet is licenced. Ahmet is besotted. Ahmet is anecdotal. Ahmet is inutile. If Ahmet is enteric and Ahmet is besotted then Ahmet is propulsive. If something is inutile then it is besotted. If Roberta is anecdotal then Roberta is propulsive. If something is besotted and enteric then it is cuprous. All besotted things are inutile. Smart, cuprous things are enteric. Blue things are besotted. Green, anecdotal things are licenced. Ahmet is not enteric.", "logic": "\nPropulsive(roberta)\nEnteric(roberta)\nLicenced(roberta)\nAnecdotal(roberta)\nInutile(roberta)\nPropulsive(ahmet)\nCuprous(ahmet)\nEnteric(ahmet)\nLicenced(ahmet)\nBesotted(ahmet)\nAnecdotal(ahmet)\nInutile(ahmet)\nEnteric(ahmet) and Besotted(ahmet) -> Propulsive(ahmet)\nforall x (Inutile(x) -> Besotted(x))\nAnecdotal(roberta) -> Propulsive(roberta)\nforall x (Besotted(x) and Enteric(x) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Besotted(x) -> Inutile(x))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) and Cuprous(x) -> Enteric(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) -> Besotted(x))\nforall x (Enteric(x) and Anecdotal(x) -> Licenced(x))\n\nnot Enteric(ahmet)\n\ntherefore Enteric(ahmet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1504"} {"premises": "Filipe is climatical. Filipe is loud. Filipe is cacodylic. Filipe is tuneless. Filipe is scalene. Rica is climatical. Rica is pelvic. Rica is loud. Rica is cacodylic. Rica is benumbed. Rica is tuneless. Rica is scalene. If Rica is loud and Rica is benumbed then Rica is climatical. If something is scalene then it is benumbed. If Filipe is tuneless then Filipe is climatical. If something is benumbed and loud then it is pelvic. All benumbed things are scalene. Smart, pelvic things are loud. Blue things are benumbed. Green, tuneless things are cacodylic. Filipe is benumbed.", "logic": "\nClimatical(filipe)\nLoud(filipe)\nCacodylic(filipe)\nTuneless(filipe)\nScalene(filipe)\nClimatical(rica)\nPelvic(rica)\nLoud(rica)\nCacodylic(rica)\nBenumbed(rica)\nTuneless(rica)\nScalene(rica)\nLoud(rica) and Benumbed(rica) -> Climatical(rica)\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nTuneless(filipe) -> Climatical(filipe)\nforall x (Benumbed(x) and Loud(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Benumbed(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) and Pelvic(x) -> Loud(x))\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Loud(x) and Tuneless(x) -> Cacodylic(x))\n\nBenumbed(filipe)\n\nClimatical(filipe) and forall x (Climatical(x) -> Benumbed(x)) -> therefore Benumbed(filipe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1504"} {"premises": "Gavin is spatulate. Gavin is appealable. Gavin is kafkaesque. Gavin is burked. Gavin is fore. Violette is spatulate. Violette is renowned. Violette is appealable. Violette is kafkaesque. Violette is areal. Violette is burked. Violette is fore. If Violette is appealable and Violette is areal then Violette is spatulate. If something is fore then it is areal. If Gavin is burked then Gavin is spatulate. If something is areal and appealable then it is renowned. All areal things are fore. Smart, renowned things are appealable. Blue things are areal. Green, burked things are kafkaesque. Gavin is not areal.", "logic": "\nSpatulate(gavin)\nAppealable(gavin)\nKafkaesque(gavin)\nBurked(gavin)\nFore(gavin)\nSpatulate(violette)\nRenowned(violette)\nAppealable(violette)\nKafkaesque(violette)\nAreal(violette)\nBurked(violette)\nFore(violette)\nAppealable(violette) and Areal(violette) -> Spatulate(violette)\nforall x (Fore(x) -> Areal(x))\nBurked(gavin) -> Spatulate(gavin)\nforall x (Areal(x) and Appealable(x) -> Renowned(x))\nforall x (Areal(x) -> Fore(x))\nforall x (Burked(x) and Renowned(x) -> Appealable(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Areal(x))\nforall x (Appealable(x) and Burked(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\n\nnot Areal(gavin)\n\nSpatulate(gavin) and forall x (Spatulate(x) -> Areal(x)) -> therefore Areal(gavin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1504"} {"premises": "Colin is wearying. Colin is telluric. Colin is dowerless. Colin is surface. Colin is breasted. Francoise is wearying. Francoise is nonliteral. Francoise is telluric. Francoise is dowerless. Francoise is upraised. Francoise is surface. Francoise is breasted. If Francoise is telluric and Francoise is upraised then Francoise is wearying. If something is breasted then it is upraised. If Colin is surface then Colin is wearying. If something is upraised and telluric then it is nonliteral. All upraised things are breasted. Smart, nonliteral things are telluric. Blue things are upraised. Green, surface things are dowerless. Colin is nonliteral.", "logic": "\nWearying(colin)\nTelluric(colin)\nDowerless(colin)\nSurface(colin)\nBreasted(colin)\nWearying(francoise)\nNonliteral(francoise)\nTelluric(francoise)\nDowerless(francoise)\nUpraised(francoise)\nSurface(francoise)\nBreasted(francoise)\nTelluric(francoise) and Upraised(francoise) -> Wearying(francoise)\nforall x (Breasted(x) -> Upraised(x))\nSurface(colin) -> Wearying(colin)\nforall x (Upraised(x) and Telluric(x) -> Nonliteral(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) -> Breasted(x))\nforall x (Surface(x) and Nonliteral(x) -> Telluric(x))\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Telluric(x) and Surface(x) -> Dowerless(x))\n\nNonliteral(colin)\n\nWearying(colin) and forall x (Wearying(x) -> Upraised(x)) -> therefore Upraised(colin) Upraised(colin) and Telluric(colin) and forall x (Upraised(x) and Telluric(x) -> Nonliteral(x)) -> therefore Nonliteral(colin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1504"} {"premises": "Dominica is interstate. Dominica is recusant. Dominica is undersexed. Dominica is catkinate. Dominica is chantlike. Dimitri is interstate. Dimitri is angelic. Dimitri is recusant. Dimitri is undersexed. Dimitri is gallican. Dimitri is catkinate. Dimitri is chantlike. If Dimitri is recusant and Dimitri is gallican then Dimitri is interstate. If something is chantlike then it is gallican. If Dominica is catkinate then Dominica is interstate. If something is gallican and recusant then it is angelic. All gallican things are chantlike. Smart, angelic things are recusant. Blue things are gallican. Green, catkinate things are undersexed. Dominica is not angelic.", "logic": "\nInterstate(dominica)\nRecusant(dominica)\nUndersexed(dominica)\nCatkinate(dominica)\nChantlike(dominica)\nInterstate(dimitri)\nAngelic(dimitri)\nRecusant(dimitri)\nUndersexed(dimitri)\nGallican(dimitri)\nCatkinate(dimitri)\nChantlike(dimitri)\nRecusant(dimitri) and Gallican(dimitri) -> Interstate(dimitri)\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> Gallican(x))\nCatkinate(dominica) -> Interstate(dominica)\nforall x (Gallican(x) and Recusant(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Gallican(x) -> Chantlike(x))\nforall x (Catkinate(x) and Angelic(x) -> Recusant(x))\nforall x (Interstate(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Recusant(x) and Catkinate(x) -> Undersexed(x))\n\nnot Angelic(dominica)\n\nInterstate(dominica) and forall x (Interstate(x) -> Gallican(x)) -> therefore Gallican(dominica) Gallican(dominica) and Recusant(dominica) and forall x (Gallican(x) and Recusant(x) -> Angelic(x)) -> therefore Angelic(dominica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1504"} {"premises": "Hamil is patched. Matthiew is patched. Gardner is weblike. Blue people are patched. All weblike people are faint. Young, patched people are wonky. Matthiew is patched.", "logic": "\nPatched(hamil)\nPatched(matthiew)\nWeblike(gardner)\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Patched(x))\nforall x (Weblike(x) -> Faint(x))\nforall x (Weblike(x) and Patched(x) -> Wonky(x))\n\nPatched(matthiew)\n\ntherefore Patched(matthiew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Dode is coeval. Ruella is coeval. Beowulf is adamantine. Blue people are coeval. All adamantine people are repelling. Young, coeval people are herculean. Beowulf is not adamantine.", "logic": "\nCoeval(dode)\nCoeval(ruella)\nAdamantine(beowulf)\nforall x (Repelling(x) -> Coeval(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Repelling(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) and Coeval(x) -> Herculean(x))\n\nnot Adamantine(beowulf)\n\ntherefore Adamantine(beowulf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Torey is cherished. Caril is cherished. Herrick is demagogic. Blue people are cherished. All demagogic people are deft. Young, cherished people are revived. Herrick is deft.", "logic": "\nCherished(torey)\nCherished(caril)\nDemagogic(herrick)\nforall x (Deft(x) -> Cherished(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) and Cherished(x) -> Revived(x))\n\nDeft(herrick)\n\nDemagogic(herrick) and forall x (Demagogic(x) -> Deft(x)) -> therefore Deft(herrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Jefferson is brutal. Hedwig is brutal. Elvira is little. Blue people are brutal. All little people are future. Young, brutal people are sticking. Elvira is not future.", "logic": "\nBrutal(jefferson)\nBrutal(hedwig)\nLittle(elvira)\nforall x (Future(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Little(x) -> Future(x))\nforall x (Little(x) and Brutal(x) -> Sticking(x))\n\nnot Future(elvira)\n\nLittle(elvira) and forall x (Little(x) -> Future(x)) -> therefore Future(elvira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Sergeant is podlike. Chad is podlike. Kim is skirting. Blue people are podlike. All skirting people are leggy. Young, podlike people are unlimited. Kim is podlike.", "logic": "\nPodlike(sergeant)\nPodlike(chad)\nSkirting(kim)\nforall x (Leggy(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Leggy(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) and Podlike(x) -> Unlimited(x))\n\nPodlike(kim)\n\nSkirting(kim) and forall x (Skirting(x) -> Leggy(x)) -> therefore Leggy(kim) Leggy(kim) and forall x (Leggy(x) -> Podlike(x)) -> therefore Podlike(kim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Selene is bloodless. Roderich is bloodless. Latisha is delineated. Blue people are bloodless. All delineated people are atlantic. Young, bloodless people are blear. Latisha is not bloodless.", "logic": "\nBloodless(selene)\nBloodless(roderich)\nDelineated(latisha)\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Delineated(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Delineated(x) and Bloodless(x) -> Blear(x))\n\nnot Bloodless(latisha)\n\nDelineated(latisha) and forall x (Delineated(x) -> Atlantic(x)) -> therefore Atlantic(latisha) Atlantic(latisha) and forall x (Atlantic(x) -> Bloodless(x)) -> therefore Bloodless(latisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Pamella is utilizable. Eada is utilizable. Durward is spastic. Blue people are utilizable. All spastic people are untenable. Young, utilizable people are rentable. Pamella is not rentable.", "logic": "\nUtilizable(pamella)\nUtilizable(eada)\nSpastic(durward)\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> Utilizable(x))\nforall x (Spastic(x) -> Untenable(x))\nforall x (Spastic(x) and Utilizable(x) -> Rentable(x))\n\nnot Rentable(pamella)\n\nforall x (Spastic(x) and Utilizable(x) -> Rentable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Sharia is nonuniform. Nerissa is nonuniform. Laura is prewar. Blue people are nonuniform. All prewar people are insolent. Young, nonuniform people are condolent. Nerissa is insolent.", "logic": "\nNonuniform(sharia)\nNonuniform(nerissa)\nPrewar(laura)\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Prewar(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Prewar(x) and Nonuniform(x) -> Condolent(x))\n\nInsolent(nerissa)\n\nforall x (Prewar(x) -> Insolent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Megen is tonsorial. Elke is tonsorial. Millisent is ornate. Blue people are tonsorial. All ornate people are elaborated. Young, tonsorial people are prenatal. Megen is not elaborated.", "logic": "\nTonsorial(megen)\nTonsorial(elke)\nOrnate(millisent)\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Tonsorial(x))\nforall x (Ornate(x) -> Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Ornate(x) and Tonsorial(x) -> Prenatal(x))\n\nnot Elaborated(megen)\n\nforall x (Ornate(x) -> Elaborated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Deanna is offbeat. Enrika is offbeat. Carolann is appendaged. Blue people are offbeat. All appendaged people are wireless. Young, offbeat people are maudlin. Deanna is red.", "logic": "\nOffbeat(deanna)\nOffbeat(enrika)\nAppendaged(carolann)\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nforall x (Appendaged(x) -> Wireless(x))\nforall x (Appendaged(x) and Offbeat(x) -> Maudlin(x))\n\nRed(deanna)\n\nRed(deanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Ediva is influent. Zacharia is influent. Salvidor is messy. Blue people are influent. All messy people are allegoric. Young, influent people are chantlike. Zacharia is not messy.", "logic": "\nInfluent(ediva)\nInfluent(zacharia)\nMessy(salvidor)\nforall x (Allegoric(x) -> Influent(x))\nforall x (Messy(x) -> Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Messy(x) and Influent(x) -> Chantlike(x))\n\nnot Messy(zacharia)\n\nnot Messy(zacharia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "Lian is bungaloid. Reggy is bungaloid. Catriona is accessory. Blue people are bungaloid. All accessory people are rarefied. Young, bungaloid people are proper. Lian is white.", "logic": "\nBungaloid(lian)\nBungaloid(reggy)\nAccessory(catriona)\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Bungaloid(x) -> Proper(x))\n\nWhite(lian)\n\nWhite(lian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-731"} {"premises": "The redford is sixpenny. The tucky sixpenny the redford. The saba is formative. If the tucky sixpenny the redford then the redford outcall the tucky. If someone outcall the tucky then the tucky gasconade the saba. The saba is formative.", "logic": "\nSixpenny(redford)\nRound(tucky, redford)\nFormative(saba)\nRound(tucky, redford) -> Outcall(redford, tucky)\nforall x (Outcall(x, tucky) -> Gasconade(tucky, saba))\n\nFormative(saba)\n\ntherefore Formative(saba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The alan is doddering. The alonzo pour the alan. The davidde is thoughtful. If the alonzo pour the alan then the alan manacle the alonzo. If someone manacle the alonzo then the alonzo decimate the davidde. The alan is not doddering.", "logic": "\nDoddering(alan)\nPour(alonzo, alan)\nThoughtful(davidde)\nPour(alonzo, alan) -> Manacle(alan, alonzo)\nforall x (Manacle(x, alonzo) -> Decimate(alonzo, davidde))\n\nnot Doddering(alan)\n\ntherefore Doddering(alan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The wandie is jelled. The betteann fluoridise the wandie. The ginger is maoist. If the betteann fluoridise the wandie then the wandie sublime the betteann. If someone sublime the betteann then the betteann camp the ginger. The wandie sublime the betteann.", "logic": "\nJelled(wandie)\nFluoridise(betteann, wandie)\nMaoist(ginger)\nFluoridise(betteann, wandie) -> Sublime(wandie, betteann)\nforall x (Sublime(x, betteann) -> Camp(betteann, ginger))\n\nSublime(wandie, betteann)\n\nFluoridise(betteann, wandie) and Fluoridise(betteann, wandie) -> Sublime(wandie, betteann) -> therefore Sublime(wandie, betteann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The adina is norman. The indira confect the adina. The irwin is fizzing. If the indira confect the adina then the adina eternalize the indira. If someone eternalize the indira then the indira reinstate the irwin. The adina does not visit the indira.", "logic": "\nNorman(adina)\nConfect(indira, adina)\nFizzing(irwin)\nConfect(indira, adina) -> Eternalize(adina, indira)\nforall x (Eternalize(x, indira) -> Reinstate(indira, irwin))\n\nnot Eternalize(adina, indira)\n\nConfect(indira, adina) and Confect(indira, adina) -> Eternalize(adina, indira) -> therefore Eternalize(adina, indira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The anitra is dovish. The eada semaphore the anitra. The annalena is unarmed. If the eada semaphore the anitra then the anitra thud the eada. If someone thud the eada then the eada remodel the annalena. The eada remodel the annalena.", "logic": "\nDovish(anitra)\nSemaphore(eada, anitra)\nUnarmed(annalena)\nSemaphore(eada, anitra) -> Thud(anitra, eada)\nforall x (Thud(x, eada) -> Remodel(eada, annalena))\n\nRemodel(eada, annalena)\n\nSemaphore(eada, anitra) and Semaphore(eada, anitra) -> Thud(anitra, eada) -> therefore Thud(anitra, eada) Thud(anitra, eada) and forall x (Thud(x, eada) -> Remodel(eada, annalena)) -> therefore Remodel(eada, annalena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The brigit is classical. The debbi welcome the brigit. The amory is shaded. If the debbi welcome the brigit then the brigit distress the debbi. If someone distress the debbi then the debbi insinuate the amory. The debbi does not need the amory.", "logic": "\nClassical(brigit)\nWelcome(debbi, brigit)\nShaded(amory)\nWelcome(debbi, brigit) -> Distress(brigit, debbi)\nforall x (Distress(x, debbi) -> Insinuate(debbi, amory))\n\nnot Insinuate(debbi, amory)\n\nWelcome(debbi, brigit) and Welcome(debbi, brigit) -> Distress(brigit, debbi) -> therefore Distress(brigit, debbi) Distress(brigit, debbi) and forall x (Distress(x, debbi) -> Insinuate(debbi, amory)) -> therefore Insinuate(debbi, amory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The sibeal is endurable. The giovanni crate the sibeal. The allen is untaught. If the giovanni crate the sibeal then the sibeal chop the giovanni. If someone chop the giovanni then the giovanni iridesce the allen. The allen does not visit the sibeal.", "logic": "\nEndurable(sibeal)\nCrate(giovanni, sibeal)\nUntaught(allen)\nCrate(giovanni, sibeal) -> Chop(sibeal, giovanni)\nforall x (Chop(x, giovanni) -> Iridesce(giovanni, allen))\n\nnot Chop(allen, sibeal)\n\nnot Chop(allen, sibeal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The rosene is skimpy. The rochella scalp the rosene. The andriette is calcitic. If the rochella scalp the rosene then the rosene enchain the rochella. If someone enchain the rochella then the rochella degenerate the andriette. The andriette is blue.", "logic": "\nSkimpy(rosene)\nScalp(rochella, rosene)\nCalcitic(andriette)\nScalp(rochella, rosene) -> Enchain(rosene, rochella)\nforall x (Enchain(x, rochella) -> Degenerate(rochella, andriette))\n\nBlue(andriette)\n\nBlue(andriette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The shaun is degraded. The clarette malign the shaun. The merridie is slimy. If the clarette malign the shaun then the shaun quest the clarette. If someone quest the clarette then the clarette sellotape the merridie. The shaun does not visit the shaun.", "logic": "\nDegraded(shaun)\nMalign(clarette, shaun)\nSlimy(merridie)\nMalign(clarette, shaun) -> Quest(shaun, clarette)\nforall x (Quest(x, clarette) -> Sellotape(clarette, merridie))\n\nnot Quest(shaun, shaun)\n\nnot Quest(shaun, shaun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The emma is stressful. The zola sheet the emma. The carolee is palladian. If the zola sheet the emma then the emma impose the zola. If someone impose the zola then the zola conspire the carolee. The emma sheet the carolee.", "logic": "\nStressful(emma)\nSheet(zola, emma)\nPalladian(carolee)\nSheet(zola, emma) -> Impose(emma, zola)\nforall x (Impose(x, zola) -> Conspire(zola, carolee))\n\nSheet(emma, carolee)\n\nSheet(emma, carolee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The buffy is zenithal. The clo fringe the buffy. The tobias is dated. If the clo fringe the buffy then the buffy gape the clo. If someone gape the clo then the clo riddle the tobias. The tobias is not big.", "logic": "\nZenithal(buffy)\nFringe(clo, buffy)\nDated(tobias)\nFringe(clo, buffy) -> Gape(buffy, clo)\nforall x (Gape(x, clo) -> Riddle(clo, tobias))\n\nnot Big(tobias)\n\nnot Big(tobias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The butler is sheathed. The breena harness the butler. The esteban is comestible. If the breena harness the butler then the butler unbend the breena. If someone unbend the breena then the breena cosponsor the esteban. The esteban harness the butler.", "logic": "\nSheathed(butler)\nHarness(breena, butler)\nComestible(esteban)\nHarness(breena, butler) -> Unbend(butler, breena)\nforall x (Unbend(x, breena) -> Cosponsor(breena, esteban))\n\nHarness(esteban, butler)\n\nHarness(esteban, butler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "Cordie is nonmoving. Maure is patrician. Maure is amebous. If something is amebous and armlike then it is untouched. If Maure is recurring and Maure is sedgy then Maure is untouched. If Cordie is patrician then Cordie is recurring. All patrician things are nonmoving. All sedgy, nonmoving things are amebous. If something is nonmoving and amebous then it is armlike. Cordie is nonmoving.", "logic": "\nNonmoving(cordie)\nPatrician(maure)\nAmebous(maure)\nforall x (Amebous(x) and Armlike(x) -> Untouched(x))\nRecurring(maure) and Sedgy(maure) -> Untouched(maure)\nPatrician(cordie) -> Recurring(cordie)\nforall x (Patrician(x) -> Nonmoving(x))\nforall x (Sedgy(x) and Nonmoving(x) -> Amebous(x))\nforall x (Nonmoving(x) and Amebous(x) -> Armlike(x))\n\nNonmoving(cordie)\n\ntherefore Nonmoving(cordie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Zedekiah is trifoliate. Daniele is hydric. Daniele is basilary. If something is basilary and shuddery then it is broadband. If Daniele is knavish and Daniele is outmoded then Daniele is broadband. If Zedekiah is hydric then Zedekiah is knavish. All hydric things are trifoliate. All outmoded, trifoliate things are basilary. If something is trifoliate and basilary then it is shuddery. Zedekiah is not trifoliate.", "logic": "\nTrifoliate(zedekiah)\nHydric(daniele)\nBasilary(daniele)\nforall x (Basilary(x) and Shuddery(x) -> Broadband(x))\nKnavish(daniele) and Outmoded(daniele) -> Broadband(daniele)\nHydric(zedekiah) -> Knavish(zedekiah)\nforall x (Hydric(x) -> Trifoliate(x))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) and Trifoliate(x) -> Basilary(x))\nforall x (Trifoliate(x) and Basilary(x) -> Shuddery(x))\n\nnot Trifoliate(zedekiah)\n\ntherefore Trifoliate(zedekiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Stewart is dioestrous. Fonsie is candied. Fonsie is friable. If something is friable and laurelled then it is brasslike. If Fonsie is unextended and Fonsie is jihadi then Fonsie is brasslike. If Stewart is candied then Stewart is unextended. All candied things are dioestrous. All jihadi, dioestrous things are friable. If something is dioestrous and friable then it is laurelled. Fonsie is dioestrous.", "logic": "\nDioestrous(stewart)\nCandied(fonsie)\nFriable(fonsie)\nforall x (Friable(x) and Laurelled(x) -> Brasslike(x))\nUnextended(fonsie) and Jihadi(fonsie) -> Brasslike(fonsie)\nCandied(stewart) -> Unextended(stewart)\nforall x (Candied(x) -> Dioestrous(x))\nforall x (Jihadi(x) and Dioestrous(x) -> Friable(x))\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) and Friable(x) -> Laurelled(x))\n\nDioestrous(fonsie)\n\nCandied(fonsie) and forall x (Candied(x) -> Dioestrous(x)) -> therefore Dioestrous(fonsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Harold is indwelling. Allegra is hellenic. Allegra is sleazy. If something is sleazy and incessant then it is barrelled. If Allegra is valorous and Allegra is achromatic then Allegra is barrelled. If Harold is hellenic then Harold is valorous. All hellenic things are indwelling. All achromatic, indwelling things are sleazy. If something is indwelling and sleazy then it is incessant. Allegra is not indwelling.", "logic": "\nIndwelling(harold)\nHellenic(allegra)\nSleazy(allegra)\nforall x (Sleazy(x) and Incessant(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nValorous(allegra) and Achromatic(allegra) -> Barrelled(allegra)\nHellenic(harold) -> Valorous(harold)\nforall x (Hellenic(x) -> Indwelling(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) and Indwelling(x) -> Sleazy(x))\nforall x (Indwelling(x) and Sleazy(x) -> Incessant(x))\n\nnot Indwelling(allegra)\n\nHellenic(allegra) and forall x (Hellenic(x) -> Indwelling(x)) -> therefore Indwelling(allegra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Kerianne is humanist. Lamont is steely. Lamont is grilled. If something is grilled and abient then it is predaceous. If Lamont is antacid and Lamont is dismal then Lamont is predaceous. If Kerianne is steely then Kerianne is antacid. All steely things are humanist. All dismal, humanist things are grilled. If something is humanist and grilled then it is abient. Lamont is abient.", "logic": "\nHumanist(kerianne)\nSteely(lamont)\nGrilled(lamont)\nforall x (Grilled(x) and Abient(x) -> Predaceous(x))\nAntacid(lamont) and Dismal(lamont) -> Predaceous(lamont)\nSteely(kerianne) -> Antacid(kerianne)\nforall x (Steely(x) -> Humanist(x))\nforall x (Dismal(x) and Humanist(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Humanist(x) and Grilled(x) -> Abient(x))\n\nAbient(lamont)\n\nSteely(lamont) and forall x (Steely(x) -> Humanist(x)) -> therefore Humanist(lamont) Humanist(lamont) and Grilled(lamont) and forall x (Humanist(x) and Grilled(x) -> Abient(x)) -> therefore Abient(lamont)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Shorty is bordered. Cherilyn is tuxedoed. Cherilyn is coolheaded. If something is coolheaded and insentient then it is repugnant. If Cherilyn is modified and Cherilyn is arboreous then Cherilyn is repugnant. If Shorty is tuxedoed then Shorty is modified. All tuxedoed things are bordered. All arboreous, bordered things are coolheaded. If something is bordered and coolheaded then it is insentient. Cherilyn is not insentient.", "logic": "\nBordered(shorty)\nTuxedoed(cherilyn)\nCoolheaded(cherilyn)\nforall x (Coolheaded(x) and Insentient(x) -> Repugnant(x))\nModified(cherilyn) and Arboreous(cherilyn) -> Repugnant(cherilyn)\nTuxedoed(shorty) -> Modified(shorty)\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Arboreous(x) and Bordered(x) -> Coolheaded(x))\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Coolheaded(x) -> Insentient(x))\n\nnot Insentient(cherilyn)\n\nTuxedoed(cherilyn) and forall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> Bordered(x)) -> therefore Bordered(cherilyn) Bordered(cherilyn) and Coolheaded(cherilyn) and forall x (Bordered(x) and Coolheaded(x) -> Insentient(x)) -> therefore Insentient(cherilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Denice is disguised. Priscilla is boyish. Priscilla is catalectic. If something is catalectic and split then it is conceptual. If Priscilla is tremulous and Priscilla is caecal then Priscilla is conceptual. If Denice is boyish then Denice is tremulous. All boyish things are disguised. All caecal, disguised things are catalectic. If something is disguised and catalectic then it is split. Denice is not conceptual.", "logic": "\nDisguised(denice)\nBoyish(priscilla)\nCatalectic(priscilla)\nforall x (Catalectic(x) and Split(x) -> Conceptual(x))\nTremulous(priscilla) and Caecal(priscilla) -> Conceptual(priscilla)\nBoyish(denice) -> Tremulous(denice)\nforall x (Boyish(x) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) and Disguised(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and Catalectic(x) -> Split(x))\n\nnot Conceptual(denice)\n\nforall x (Catalectic(x) and Split(x) -> Conceptual(x)) <- forall x (Caecal(x) and Disguised(x) -> Catalectic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Joaquin is unroofed. Teresa is gigantic. Teresa is mucky. If something is mucky and successful then it is devout. If Teresa is viceregal and Teresa is tentacled then Teresa is devout. If Joaquin is gigantic then Joaquin is viceregal. All gigantic things are unroofed. All tentacled, unroofed things are mucky. If something is unroofed and mucky then it is successful. Joaquin is mucky.", "logic": "\nUnroofed(joaquin)\nGigantic(teresa)\nMucky(teresa)\nforall x (Mucky(x) and Successful(x) -> Devout(x))\nViceregal(teresa) and Tentacled(teresa) -> Devout(teresa)\nGigantic(joaquin) -> Viceregal(joaquin)\nforall x (Gigantic(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Tentacled(x) and Unroofed(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) and Mucky(x) -> Successful(x))\n\nMucky(joaquin)\n\nforall x (Tentacled(x) and Unroofed(x) -> Mucky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Eberhard is lienal. Blakeley is shona. Blakeley is majuscule. If something is majuscule and cheeselike then it is tailored. If Blakeley is gonzo and Blakeley is flighted then Blakeley is tailored. If Eberhard is shona then Eberhard is gonzo. All shona things are lienal. All flighted, lienal things are majuscule. If something is lienal and majuscule then it is cheeselike. Eberhard is not cheeselike.", "logic": "\nLienal(eberhard)\nShona(blakeley)\nMajuscule(blakeley)\nforall x (Majuscule(x) and Cheeselike(x) -> Tailored(x))\nGonzo(blakeley) and Flighted(blakeley) -> Tailored(blakeley)\nShona(eberhard) -> Gonzo(eberhard)\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) and Lienal(x) -> Majuscule(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Majuscule(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\n\nnot Cheeselike(eberhard)\n\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Majuscule(x) -> Cheeselike(x)) <- forall x (Flighted(x) and Lienal(x) -> Majuscule(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Cameo is prescribed. Monica is lovesick. Monica is parametric. If something is parametric and bolometric then it is overcast. If Monica is seamless and Monica is remarkable then Monica is overcast. If Cameo is lovesick then Cameo is seamless. All lovesick things are prescribed. All remarkable, prescribed things are parametric. If something is prescribed and parametric then it is bolometric. Cameo is remarkable.", "logic": "\nPrescribed(cameo)\nLovesick(monica)\nParametric(monica)\nforall x (Parametric(x) and Bolometric(x) -> Overcast(x))\nSeamless(monica) and Remarkable(monica) -> Overcast(monica)\nLovesick(cameo) -> Seamless(cameo)\nforall x (Lovesick(x) -> Prescribed(x))\nforall x (Remarkable(x) and Prescribed(x) -> Parametric(x))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and Parametric(x) -> Bolometric(x))\n\nRemarkable(cameo)\n\nRemarkable(cameo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Alexei is broody. Calida is tailed. Calida is baleful. If something is baleful and unvigilant then it is ascetic. If Calida is genoese and Calida is bilgy then Calida is ascetic. If Alexei is tailed then Alexei is genoese. All tailed things are broody. All bilgy, broody things are baleful. If something is broody and baleful then it is unvigilant. Calida is not bilgy.", "logic": "\nBroody(alexei)\nTailed(calida)\nBaleful(calida)\nforall x (Baleful(x) and Unvigilant(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nGenoese(calida) and Bilgy(calida) -> Ascetic(calida)\nTailed(alexei) -> Genoese(alexei)\nforall x (Tailed(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Bilgy(x) and Broody(x) -> Baleful(x))\nforall x (Broody(x) and Baleful(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\n\nnot Bilgy(calida)\n\nnot Bilgy(calida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "Guthry is reposeful. Meira is nectarous. Meira is membered. If something is membered and dental then it is wilsonian. If Meira is unending and Meira is lavish then Meira is wilsonian. If Guthry is nectarous then Guthry is unending. All nectarous things are reposeful. All lavish, reposeful things are membered. If something is reposeful and membered then it is dental. Meira is unending.", "logic": "\nReposeful(guthry)\nNectarous(meira)\nMembered(meira)\nforall x (Membered(x) and Dental(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\nUnending(meira) and Lavish(meira) -> Wilsonian(meira)\nNectarous(guthry) -> Unending(guthry)\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Membered(x))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) and Membered(x) -> Dental(x))\n\nUnending(meira)\n\nUnending(meira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1697"} {"premises": "The skipp suppress the corky. The skipp does not eat the corky. The skipp is migratory. The skipp is manichaean. The skipp compute the corky. The corky screak the skipp. The corky compute the skipp. If someone compute the corky and they are bribable then the corky suppress the skipp. If someone suppress the skipp then they like the corky. If the skipp compute the corky and the skipp does not eat the corky then the skipp is manichaean. If the skipp suppress the corky and the corky suppress the skipp then the corky compute the skipp. If someone suppress the corky then they are bribable. If someone is manichaean and they eat the corky then the corky does not eat the skipp. If someone suppress the corky and the corky is manichaean then they are migratory. If someone screak the corky and they do not like the corky then the corky is brownish. The skipp suppress the corky.", "logic": "\nSuppress(skipp, corky)\nnot Screak(skipp, corky)\nMigratory(skipp)\nManichaean(skipp)\nCompute(skipp, corky)\nScreak(corky, skipp)\nCompute(corky, skipp)\nforall x (Compute(x, corky) and Bribable(x) -> Suppress(corky, skipp))\nforall x (Suppress(x, skipp) -> Compute(x, corky))\nCompute(skipp, corky) and not Screak(skipp, corky) -> Manichaean(skipp)\nSuppress(skipp, corky) and Suppress(corky, skipp) -> Compute(corky, skipp)\nforall x (Suppress(x, corky) -> Bribable(x))\nforall x (Manichaean(x) and Screak(x, corky) -> not Screak(corky, skipp))\nforall x (Suppress(x, corky) and Manichaean(corky) -> Migratory(x))\nforall x (Screak(x, corky) and not Compute(x, corky) -> Brownish(corky))\n\nSuppress(skipp, corky)\n\ntherefore Suppress(skipp, corky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The ferinand convolute the sandye. The ferinand does not eat the sandye. The ferinand is shitless. The ferinand is indecent. The ferinand cord the sandye. The sandye brandmark the ferinand. The sandye cord the ferinand. If someone cord the sandye and they are aligning then the sandye convolute the ferinand. If someone convolute the ferinand then they like the sandye. If the ferinand cord the sandye and the ferinand does not eat the sandye then the ferinand is indecent. If the ferinand convolute the sandye and the sandye convolute the ferinand then the sandye cord the ferinand. If someone convolute the sandye then they are aligning. If someone is indecent and they eat the sandye then the sandye does not eat the ferinand. If someone convolute the sandye and the sandye is indecent then they are shitless. If someone brandmark the sandye and they do not like the sandye then the sandye is asleep. The ferinand is not shitless.", "logic": "\nConvolute(ferinand, sandye)\nnot Brandmark(ferinand, sandye)\nShitless(ferinand)\nIndecent(ferinand)\nCord(ferinand, sandye)\nBrandmark(sandye, ferinand)\nCord(sandye, ferinand)\nforall x (Cord(x, sandye) and Aligning(x) -> Convolute(sandye, ferinand))\nforall x (Convolute(x, ferinand) -> Cord(x, sandye))\nCord(ferinand, sandye) and not Brandmark(ferinand, sandye) -> Indecent(ferinand)\nConvolute(ferinand, sandye) and Convolute(sandye, ferinand) -> Cord(sandye, ferinand)\nforall x (Convolute(x, sandye) -> Aligning(x))\nforall x (Indecent(x) and Brandmark(x, sandye) -> not Brandmark(sandye, ferinand))\nforall x (Convolute(x, sandye) and Indecent(sandye) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, sandye) and not Cord(x, sandye) -> Asleep(sandye))\n\nnot Shitless(ferinand)\n\ntherefore Shitless(ferinand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The chastity verbalise the codee. The chastity does not eat the codee. The chastity is lancelike. The chastity is doctorial. The chastity redo the codee. The codee stockpile the chastity. The codee redo the chastity. If someone redo the codee and they are dentate then the codee verbalise the chastity. If someone verbalise the chastity then they like the codee. If the chastity redo the codee and the chastity does not eat the codee then the chastity is doctorial. If the chastity verbalise the codee and the codee verbalise the chastity then the codee redo the chastity. If someone verbalise the codee then they are dentate. If someone is doctorial and they eat the codee then the codee does not eat the chastity. If someone verbalise the codee and the codee is doctorial then they are lancelike. If someone stockpile the codee and they do not like the codee then the codee is saturated. The chastity is dentate.", "logic": "\nVerbalise(chastity, codee)\nnot Stockpile(chastity, codee)\nLancelike(chastity)\nDoctorial(chastity)\nRedo(chastity, codee)\nStockpile(codee, chastity)\nRedo(codee, chastity)\nforall x (Redo(x, codee) and Dentate(x) -> Verbalise(codee, chastity))\nforall x (Verbalise(x, chastity) -> Redo(x, codee))\nRedo(chastity, codee) and not Stockpile(chastity, codee) -> Doctorial(chastity)\nVerbalise(chastity, codee) and Verbalise(codee, chastity) -> Redo(codee, chastity)\nforall x (Verbalise(x, codee) -> Dentate(x))\nforall x (Doctorial(x) and Stockpile(x, codee) -> not Stockpile(codee, chastity))\nforall x (Verbalise(x, codee) and Doctorial(codee) -> Lancelike(x))\nforall x (Stockpile(x, codee) and not Redo(x, codee) -> Saturated(codee))\n\nDentate(chastity)\n\nVerbalise(chastity, codee) and forall x (Verbalise(x, codee) -> Dentate(x)) -> therefore Dentate(chastity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The sigfried distil the lorilee. The sigfried does not eat the lorilee. The sigfried is existent. The sigfried is ungoverned. The sigfried thrum the lorilee. The lorilee blaspheme the sigfried. The lorilee thrum the sigfried. If someone thrum the lorilee and they are middle then the lorilee distil the sigfried. If someone distil the sigfried then they like the lorilee. If the sigfried thrum the lorilee and the sigfried does not eat the lorilee then the sigfried is ungoverned. If the sigfried distil the lorilee and the lorilee distil the sigfried then the lorilee thrum the sigfried. If someone distil the lorilee then they are middle. If someone is ungoverned and they eat the lorilee then the lorilee does not eat the sigfried. If someone distil the lorilee and the lorilee is ungoverned then they are existent. If someone blaspheme the lorilee and they do not like the lorilee then the lorilee is compelling. The sigfried is not middle.", "logic": "\nDistil(sigfried, lorilee)\nnot Blaspheme(sigfried, lorilee)\nExistent(sigfried)\nUngoverned(sigfried)\nThrum(sigfried, lorilee)\nBlaspheme(lorilee, sigfried)\nThrum(lorilee, sigfried)\nforall x (Thrum(x, lorilee) and Middle(x) -> Distil(lorilee, sigfried))\nforall x (Distil(x, sigfried) -> Thrum(x, lorilee))\nThrum(sigfried, lorilee) and not Blaspheme(sigfried, lorilee) -> Ungoverned(sigfried)\nDistil(sigfried, lorilee) and Distil(lorilee, sigfried) -> Thrum(lorilee, sigfried)\nforall x (Distil(x, lorilee) -> Middle(x))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and Blaspheme(x, lorilee) -> not Blaspheme(lorilee, sigfried))\nforall x (Distil(x, lorilee) and Ungoverned(lorilee) -> Existent(x))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, lorilee) and not Thrum(x, lorilee) -> Compelling(lorilee))\n\nnot Middle(sigfried)\n\nDistil(sigfried, lorilee) and forall x (Distil(x, lorilee) -> Middle(x)) -> therefore Middle(sigfried)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The marena rhapsodize the winnah. The marena does not eat the winnah. The marena is trabeated. The marena is infuriated. The marena creosote the winnah. The winnah clunk the marena. The winnah creosote the marena. If someone creosote the winnah and they are acoustic then the winnah rhapsodize the marena. If someone rhapsodize the marena then they like the winnah. If the marena creosote the winnah and the marena does not eat the winnah then the marena is infuriated. If the marena rhapsodize the winnah and the winnah rhapsodize the marena then the winnah creosote the marena. If someone rhapsodize the winnah then they are acoustic. If someone is infuriated and they eat the winnah then the winnah does not eat the marena. If someone rhapsodize the winnah and the winnah is infuriated then they are trabeated. If someone clunk the winnah and they do not like the winnah then the winnah is confused. The winnah rhapsodize the marena.", "logic": "\nRhapsodize(marena, winnah)\nnot Clunk(marena, winnah)\nTrabeated(marena)\nInfuriated(marena)\nCreosote(marena, winnah)\nClunk(winnah, marena)\nCreosote(winnah, marena)\nforall x (Creosote(x, winnah) and Acoustic(x) -> Rhapsodize(winnah, marena))\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, marena) -> Creosote(x, winnah))\nCreosote(marena, winnah) and not Clunk(marena, winnah) -> Infuriated(marena)\nRhapsodize(marena, winnah) and Rhapsodize(winnah, marena) -> Creosote(winnah, marena)\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, winnah) -> Acoustic(x))\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Clunk(x, winnah) -> not Clunk(winnah, marena))\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, winnah) and Infuriated(winnah) -> Trabeated(x))\nforall x (Clunk(x, winnah) and not Creosote(x, winnah) -> Confused(winnah))\n\nRhapsodize(winnah, marena)\n\nRhapsodize(marena, winnah) and forall x (Rhapsodize(x, winnah) -> Acoustic(x)) -> therefore Acoustic(marena) Creosote(marena, winnah) and Acoustic(marena) and forall x (Creosote(x, winnah) and Acoustic(x) -> Rhapsodize(winnah, marena)) -> therefore Rhapsodize(winnah, marena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The madelin tinct the zena. The madelin does not eat the zena. The madelin is vociferous. The madelin is millennian. The madelin balance the zena. The zena plead the madelin. The zena balance the madelin. If someone balance the zena and they are expanded then the zena tinct the madelin. If someone tinct the madelin then they like the zena. If the madelin balance the zena and the madelin does not eat the zena then the madelin is millennian. If the madelin tinct the zena and the zena tinct the madelin then the zena balance the madelin. If someone tinct the zena then they are expanded. If someone is millennian and they eat the zena then the zena does not eat the madelin. If someone tinct the zena and the zena is millennian then they are vociferous. If someone plead the zena and they do not like the zena then the zena is apocarpous. The zena does not chase the madelin.", "logic": "\nTinct(madelin, zena)\nnot Plead(madelin, zena)\nVociferous(madelin)\nMillennian(madelin)\nBalance(madelin, zena)\nPlead(zena, madelin)\nBalance(zena, madelin)\nforall x (Balance(x, zena) and Expanded(x) -> Tinct(zena, madelin))\nforall x (Tinct(x, madelin) -> Balance(x, zena))\nBalance(madelin, zena) and not Plead(madelin, zena) -> Millennian(madelin)\nTinct(madelin, zena) and Tinct(zena, madelin) -> Balance(zena, madelin)\nforall x (Tinct(x, zena) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) and Plead(x, zena) -> not Plead(zena, madelin))\nforall x (Tinct(x, zena) and Millennian(zena) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Plead(x, zena) and not Balance(x, zena) -> Apocarpous(zena))\n\nnot Tinct(zena, madelin)\n\nTinct(madelin, zena) and forall x (Tinct(x, zena) -> Expanded(x)) -> therefore Expanded(madelin) Balance(madelin, zena) and Expanded(madelin) and forall x (Balance(x, zena) and Expanded(x) -> Tinct(zena, madelin)) -> therefore Tinct(zena, madelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The hobart muff the cybal. The hobart does not eat the cybal. The hobart is singsong. The hobart is postwar. The hobart contrast the cybal. The cybal retell the hobart. The cybal contrast the hobart. If someone contrast the cybal and they are scraggly then the cybal muff the hobart. If someone muff the hobart then they like the cybal. If the hobart contrast the cybal and the hobart does not eat the cybal then the hobart is postwar. If the hobart muff the cybal and the cybal muff the hobart then the cybal contrast the hobart. If someone muff the cybal then they are scraggly. If someone is postwar and they eat the cybal then the cybal does not eat the hobart. If someone muff the cybal and the cybal is postwar then they are singsong. If someone retell the cybal and they do not like the cybal then the cybal is ethnic. The cybal is not singsong.", "logic": "\nMuff(hobart, cybal)\nnot Retell(hobart, cybal)\nSingsong(hobart)\nPostwar(hobart)\nContrast(hobart, cybal)\nRetell(cybal, hobart)\nContrast(cybal, hobart)\nforall x (Contrast(x, cybal) and Scraggly(x) -> Muff(cybal, hobart))\nforall x (Muff(x, hobart) -> Contrast(x, cybal))\nContrast(hobart, cybal) and not Retell(hobart, cybal) -> Postwar(hobart)\nMuff(hobart, cybal) and Muff(cybal, hobart) -> Contrast(cybal, hobart)\nforall x (Muff(x, cybal) -> Scraggly(x))\nforall x (Postwar(x) and Retell(x, cybal) -> not Retell(cybal, hobart))\nforall x (Muff(x, cybal) and Postwar(cybal) -> Singsong(x))\nforall x (Retell(x, cybal) and not Contrast(x, cybal) -> Ethnic(cybal))\n\nnot Singsong(cybal)\n\nforall x (Muff(x, cybal) and Postwar(cybal) -> Singsong(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The brandise sediment the oberon. The brandise does not eat the oberon. The brandise is powered. The brandise is jinxed. The brandise pound the oberon. The oberon lampoon the brandise. The oberon pound the brandise. If someone pound the oberon and they are dolomitic then the oberon sediment the brandise. If someone sediment the brandise then they like the oberon. If the brandise pound the oberon and the brandise does not eat the oberon then the brandise is jinxed. If the brandise sediment the oberon and the oberon sediment the brandise then the oberon pound the brandise. If someone sediment the oberon then they are dolomitic. If someone is jinxed and they eat the oberon then the oberon does not eat the brandise. If someone sediment the oberon and the oberon is jinxed then they are powered. If someone lampoon the oberon and they do not like the oberon then the oberon is hymeneal. The oberon is dolomitic.", "logic": "\nSediment(brandise, oberon)\nnot Lampoon(brandise, oberon)\nPowered(brandise)\nJinxed(brandise)\nPound(brandise, oberon)\nLampoon(oberon, brandise)\nPound(oberon, brandise)\nforall x (Pound(x, oberon) and Dolomitic(x) -> Sediment(oberon, brandise))\nforall x (Sediment(x, brandise) -> Pound(x, oberon))\nPound(brandise, oberon) and not Lampoon(brandise, oberon) -> Jinxed(brandise)\nSediment(brandise, oberon) and Sediment(oberon, brandise) -> Pound(oberon, brandise)\nforall x (Sediment(x, oberon) -> Dolomitic(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and Lampoon(x, oberon) -> not Lampoon(oberon, brandise))\nforall x (Sediment(x, oberon) and Jinxed(oberon) -> Powered(x))\nforall x (Lampoon(x, oberon) and not Pound(x, oberon) -> Hymeneal(oberon))\n\nDolomitic(oberon)\n\nforall x (Sediment(x, oberon) -> Dolomitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The oprah handicap the ford. The oprah does not eat the ford. The oprah is stoical. The oprah is cathodic. The oprah sandwich the ford. The ford crepe the oprah. The ford sandwich the oprah. If someone sandwich the ford and they are chemical then the ford handicap the oprah. If someone handicap the oprah then they like the ford. If the oprah sandwich the ford and the oprah does not eat the ford then the oprah is cathodic. If the oprah handicap the ford and the ford handicap the oprah then the ford sandwich the oprah. If someone handicap the ford then they are chemical. If someone is cathodic and they eat the ford then the ford does not eat the oprah. If someone handicap the ford and the ford is cathodic then they are stoical. If someone crepe the ford and they do not like the ford then the ford is jittering. The ford is not jittering.", "logic": "\nHandicap(oprah, ford)\nnot Crepe(oprah, ford)\nStoical(oprah)\nCathodic(oprah)\nSandwich(oprah, ford)\nCrepe(ford, oprah)\nSandwich(ford, oprah)\nforall x (Sandwich(x, ford) and Chemical(x) -> Handicap(ford, oprah))\nforall x (Handicap(x, oprah) -> Sandwich(x, ford))\nSandwich(oprah, ford) and not Crepe(oprah, ford) -> Cathodic(oprah)\nHandicap(oprah, ford) and Handicap(ford, oprah) -> Sandwich(ford, oprah)\nforall x (Handicap(x, ford) -> Chemical(x))\nforall x (Cathodic(x) and Crepe(x, ford) -> not Crepe(ford, oprah))\nforall x (Handicap(x, ford) and Cathodic(ford) -> Stoical(x))\nforall x (Crepe(x, ford) and not Sandwich(x, ford) -> Jittering(ford))\n\nnot Jittering(ford)\n\nforall x (Crepe(x, ford) and not Sandwich(x, ford) -> Jittering(ford)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The avram librate the lillis. The avram does not eat the lillis. The avram is bicolored. The avram is baseborn. The avram tank the lillis. The lillis champ the avram. The lillis tank the avram. If someone tank the lillis and they are bindable then the lillis librate the avram. If someone librate the avram then they like the lillis. If the avram tank the lillis and the avram does not eat the lillis then the avram is baseborn. If the avram librate the lillis and the lillis librate the avram then the lillis tank the avram. If someone librate the lillis then they are bindable. If someone is baseborn and they eat the lillis then the lillis does not eat the avram. If someone librate the lillis and the lillis is baseborn then they are bicolored. If someone champ the lillis and they do not like the lillis then the lillis is unimpeded. The avram librate the avram.", "logic": "\nLibrate(avram, lillis)\nnot Champ(avram, lillis)\nBicolored(avram)\nBaseborn(avram)\nTank(avram, lillis)\nChamp(lillis, avram)\nTank(lillis, avram)\nforall x (Tank(x, lillis) and Bindable(x) -> Librate(lillis, avram))\nforall x (Librate(x, avram) -> Tank(x, lillis))\nTank(avram, lillis) and not Champ(avram, lillis) -> Baseborn(avram)\nLibrate(avram, lillis) and Librate(lillis, avram) -> Tank(lillis, avram)\nforall x (Librate(x, lillis) -> Bindable(x))\nforall x (Baseborn(x) and Champ(x, lillis) -> not Champ(lillis, avram))\nforall x (Librate(x, lillis) and Baseborn(lillis) -> Bicolored(x))\nforall x (Champ(x, lillis) and not Tank(x, lillis) -> Unimpeded(lillis))\n\nLibrate(avram, avram)\n\nLibrate(avram, avram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The northrop personify the burt. The northrop does not eat the burt. The northrop is patrician. The northrop is italic. The northrop riposte the burt. The burt mediate the northrop. The burt riposte the northrop. If someone riposte the burt and they are upstage then the burt personify the northrop. If someone personify the northrop then they like the burt. If the northrop riposte the burt and the northrop does not eat the burt then the northrop is italic. If the northrop personify the burt and the burt personify the northrop then the burt riposte the northrop. If someone personify the burt then they are upstage. If someone is italic and they eat the burt then the burt does not eat the northrop. If someone personify the burt and the burt is italic then they are patrician. If someone mediate the burt and they do not like the burt then the burt is worsened. The northrop does not eat the northrop.", "logic": "\nPersonify(northrop, burt)\nnot Mediate(northrop, burt)\nPatrician(northrop)\nItalic(northrop)\nRiposte(northrop, burt)\nMediate(burt, northrop)\nRiposte(burt, northrop)\nforall x (Riposte(x, burt) and Upstage(x) -> Personify(burt, northrop))\nforall x (Personify(x, northrop) -> Riposte(x, burt))\nRiposte(northrop, burt) and not Mediate(northrop, burt) -> Italic(northrop)\nPersonify(northrop, burt) and Personify(burt, northrop) -> Riposte(burt, northrop)\nforall x (Personify(x, burt) -> Upstage(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) and Mediate(x, burt) -> not Mediate(burt, northrop))\nforall x (Personify(x, burt) and Italic(burt) -> Patrician(x))\nforall x (Mediate(x, burt) and not Riposte(x, burt) -> Worsened(burt))\n\nnot Mediate(northrop, northrop)\n\nnot Mediate(northrop, northrop) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "The taber scaffold the brent. The taber does not eat the brent. The taber is realistic. The taber is otiose. The taber stampede the brent. The brent anodize the taber. The brent stampede the taber. If someone stampede the brent and they are apopemptic then the brent scaffold the taber. If someone scaffold the taber then they like the brent. If the taber stampede the brent and the taber does not eat the brent then the taber is otiose. If the taber scaffold the brent and the brent scaffold the taber then the brent stampede the taber. If someone scaffold the brent then they are apopemptic. If someone is otiose and they eat the brent then the brent does not eat the taber. If someone scaffold the brent and the brent is otiose then they are realistic. If someone anodize the brent and they do not like the brent then the brent is blotchy. The taber is red.", "logic": "\nScaffold(taber, brent)\nnot Anodize(taber, brent)\nRealistic(taber)\nOtiose(taber)\nStampede(taber, brent)\nAnodize(brent, taber)\nStampede(brent, taber)\nforall x (Stampede(x, brent) and Apopemptic(x) -> Scaffold(brent, taber))\nforall x (Scaffold(x, taber) -> Stampede(x, brent))\nStampede(taber, brent) and not Anodize(taber, brent) -> Otiose(taber)\nScaffold(taber, brent) and Scaffold(brent, taber) -> Stampede(brent, taber)\nforall x (Scaffold(x, brent) -> Apopemptic(x))\nforall x (Otiose(x) and Anodize(x, brent) -> not Anodize(brent, taber))\nforall x (Scaffold(x, brent) and Otiose(brent) -> Realistic(x))\nforall x (Anodize(x, brent) and not Stampede(x, brent) -> Blotchy(brent))\n\nRed(taber)\n\nRed(taber) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-112"} {"premises": "Troy is fateful. Troy is rutty. Reina is uncultured. Reina is unexpected. Reina is fateful. Reina is null. Reina is rigid. Reina is rutty. Reina is revokable. Dalila is uncultured. Dalila is null. Dalila is rutty. If Dalila is fateful then Dalila is revokable. All null people are unexpected. All revokable people are fateful. Nice, rigid people are rutty. If someone is rutty and rigid then they are null. If someone is uncultured then they are fateful. Reina is uncultured.", "logic": "\nFateful(troy)\nRutty(troy)\nUncultured(reina)\nUnexpected(reina)\nFateful(reina)\nNull(reina)\nRigid(reina)\nRutty(reina)\nRevokable(reina)\nUncultured(dalila)\nNull(dalila)\nRutty(dalila)\nFateful(dalila) -> Revokable(dalila)\nforall x (Null(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Revokable(x) -> Fateful(x))\nforall x (Null(x) and Rigid(x) -> Rutty(x))\nforall x (Rutty(x) and Rigid(x) -> Null(x))\nforall x (Uncultured(x) -> Fateful(x))\n\nUncultured(reina)\n\ntherefore Uncultured(reina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Colene is katabolic. Colene is jaundiced. Channa is churning. Channa is tonguelike. Channa is katabolic. Channa is untrodden. Channa is undried. Channa is jaundiced. Channa is third. Micheil is churning. Micheil is untrodden. Micheil is jaundiced. If Micheil is katabolic then Micheil is third. All untrodden people are tonguelike. All third people are katabolic. Nice, undried people are jaundiced. If someone is jaundiced and undried then they are untrodden. If someone is churning then they are katabolic. Micheil is not untrodden.", "logic": "\nKatabolic(colene)\nJaundiced(colene)\nChurning(channa)\nTonguelike(channa)\nKatabolic(channa)\nUntrodden(channa)\nUndried(channa)\nJaundiced(channa)\nThird(channa)\nChurning(micheil)\nUntrodden(micheil)\nJaundiced(micheil)\nKatabolic(micheil) -> Third(micheil)\nforall x (Untrodden(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Third(x) -> Katabolic(x))\nforall x (Untrodden(x) and Undried(x) -> Jaundiced(x))\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) and Undried(x) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Churning(x) -> Katabolic(x))\n\nnot Untrodden(micheil)\n\ntherefore Untrodden(micheil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Sada is leased. Sada is graphic. Madonna is saintly. Madonna is unromantic. Madonna is leased. Madonna is hemophilic. Madonna is agitative. Madonna is graphic. Madonna is acetic. Lisbeth is saintly. Lisbeth is hemophilic. Lisbeth is graphic. If Lisbeth is leased then Lisbeth is acetic. All hemophilic people are unromantic. All acetic people are leased. Nice, agitative people are graphic. If someone is graphic and agitative then they are hemophilic. If someone is saintly then they are leased. Lisbeth is unromantic.", "logic": "\nLeased(sada)\nGraphic(sada)\nSaintly(madonna)\nUnromantic(madonna)\nLeased(madonna)\nHemophilic(madonna)\nAgitative(madonna)\nGraphic(madonna)\nAcetic(madonna)\nSaintly(lisbeth)\nHemophilic(lisbeth)\nGraphic(lisbeth)\nLeased(lisbeth) -> Acetic(lisbeth)\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Acetic(x) -> Leased(x))\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) and Agitative(x) -> Graphic(x))\nforall x (Graphic(x) and Agitative(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Saintly(x) -> Leased(x))\n\nUnromantic(lisbeth)\n\nHemophilic(lisbeth) and forall x (Hemophilic(x) -> Unromantic(x)) -> therefore Unromantic(lisbeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Wilmer is expert. Wilmer is reddened. Tilda is menial. Tilda is becalmed. Tilda is expert. Tilda is unplaced. Tilda is worth. Tilda is reddened. Tilda is scots. Goldina is menial. Goldina is unplaced. Goldina is reddened. If Goldina is expert then Goldina is scots. All unplaced people are becalmed. All scots people are expert. Nice, worth people are reddened. If someone is reddened and worth then they are unplaced. If someone is menial then they are expert. Goldina is not expert.", "logic": "\nExpert(wilmer)\nReddened(wilmer)\nMenial(tilda)\nBecalmed(tilda)\nExpert(tilda)\nUnplaced(tilda)\nWorth(tilda)\nReddened(tilda)\nScots(tilda)\nMenial(goldina)\nUnplaced(goldina)\nReddened(goldina)\nExpert(goldina) -> Scots(goldina)\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nforall x (Scots(x) -> Expert(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) and Worth(x) -> Reddened(x))\nforall x (Reddened(x) and Worth(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Menial(x) -> Expert(x))\n\nnot Expert(goldina)\n\nMenial(goldina) and forall x (Menial(x) -> Expert(x)) -> therefore Expert(goldina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Tera is reeking. Tera is overactive. Katrina is corrugated. Katrina is shiftless. Katrina is reeking. Katrina is unexplored. Katrina is hemic. Katrina is overactive. Katrina is tympanitic. Dina is corrugated. Dina is unexplored. Dina is overactive. If Dina is reeking then Dina is tympanitic. All unexplored people are shiftless. All tympanitic people are reeking. Nice, hemic people are overactive. If someone is overactive and hemic then they are unexplored. If someone is corrugated then they are reeking. Dina is tympanitic.", "logic": "\nReeking(tera)\nOveractive(tera)\nCorrugated(katrina)\nShiftless(katrina)\nReeking(katrina)\nUnexplored(katrina)\nHemic(katrina)\nOveractive(katrina)\nTympanitic(katrina)\nCorrugated(dina)\nUnexplored(dina)\nOveractive(dina)\nReeking(dina) -> Tympanitic(dina)\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Reeking(x))\nforall x (Unexplored(x) and Hemic(x) -> Overactive(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Hemic(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Corrugated(x) -> Reeking(x))\n\nTympanitic(dina)\n\nCorrugated(dina) and forall x (Corrugated(x) -> Reeking(x)) -> therefore Reeking(dina) Reeking(dina) and Reeking(dina) -> Tympanitic(dina) -> therefore Tympanitic(dina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Valry is seismal. Valry is eradicable. Opal is adoptive. Opal is dread. Opal is seismal. Opal is stinging. Opal is edged. Opal is eradicable. Opal is bottom. Welsh is adoptive. Welsh is stinging. Welsh is eradicable. If Welsh is seismal then Welsh is bottom. All stinging people are dread. All bottom people are seismal. Nice, edged people are eradicable. If someone is eradicable and edged then they are stinging. If someone is adoptive then they are seismal. Welsh is not bottom.", "logic": "\nSeismal(valry)\nEradicable(valry)\nAdoptive(opal)\nDread(opal)\nSeismal(opal)\nStinging(opal)\nEdged(opal)\nEradicable(opal)\nBottom(opal)\nAdoptive(welsh)\nStinging(welsh)\nEradicable(welsh)\nSeismal(welsh) -> Bottom(welsh)\nforall x (Stinging(x) -> Dread(x))\nforall x (Bottom(x) -> Seismal(x))\nforall x (Stinging(x) and Edged(x) -> Eradicable(x))\nforall x (Eradicable(x) and Edged(x) -> Stinging(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Seismal(x))\n\nnot Bottom(welsh)\n\nAdoptive(welsh) and forall x (Adoptive(x) -> Seismal(x)) -> therefore Seismal(welsh) Seismal(welsh) and Seismal(welsh) -> Bottom(welsh) -> therefore Bottom(welsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Clio is tailored. Clio is pharyngeal. Zitella is saddled. Zitella is basilar. Zitella is tailored. Zitella is micro. Zitella is unkept. Zitella is pharyngeal. Zitella is dishonest. Myrilla is saddled. Myrilla is micro. Myrilla is pharyngeal. If Myrilla is tailored then Myrilla is dishonest. All micro people are basilar. All dishonest people are tailored. Nice, unkept people are pharyngeal. If someone is pharyngeal and unkept then they are micro. If someone is saddled then they are tailored. Clio is not micro.", "logic": "\nTailored(clio)\nPharyngeal(clio)\nSaddled(zitella)\nBasilar(zitella)\nTailored(zitella)\nMicro(zitella)\nUnkept(zitella)\nPharyngeal(zitella)\nDishonest(zitella)\nSaddled(myrilla)\nMicro(myrilla)\nPharyngeal(myrilla)\nTailored(myrilla) -> Dishonest(myrilla)\nforall x (Micro(x) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Dishonest(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Micro(x) and Unkept(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) and Unkept(x) -> Micro(x))\nforall x (Saddled(x) -> Tailored(x))\n\nnot Micro(clio)\n\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) and Unkept(x) -> Micro(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Lissa is leglike. Lissa is zonal. Dorella is christly. Dorella is lxxii. Dorella is leglike. Dorella is briery. Dorella is admirable. Dorella is zonal. Dorella is seeable. Cybelle is christly. Cybelle is briery. Cybelle is zonal. If Cybelle is leglike then Cybelle is seeable. All briery people are lxxii. All seeable people are leglike. Nice, admirable people are zonal. If someone is zonal and admirable then they are briery. If someone is christly then they are leglike. Lissa is lxxii.", "logic": "\nLeglike(lissa)\nZonal(lissa)\nChristly(dorella)\nLxxii(dorella)\nLeglike(dorella)\nBriery(dorella)\nAdmirable(dorella)\nZonal(dorella)\nSeeable(dorella)\nChristly(cybelle)\nBriery(cybelle)\nZonal(cybelle)\nLeglike(cybelle) -> Seeable(cybelle)\nforall x (Briery(x) -> Lxxii(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) -> Leglike(x))\nforall x (Briery(x) and Admirable(x) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Admirable(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) -> Leglike(x))\n\nLxxii(lissa)\n\nforall x (Briery(x) -> Lxxii(x)) <- forall x (Zonal(x) and Admirable(x) -> Briery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Doyle is unwearable. Doyle is eurasian. Chas is equivocal. Chas is hispanic. Chas is unwearable. Chas is fuggy. Chas is clubbish. Chas is eurasian. Chas is livable. Ethel is equivocal. Ethel is fuggy. Ethel is eurasian. If Ethel is unwearable then Ethel is livable. All fuggy people are hispanic. All livable people are unwearable. Nice, clubbish people are eurasian. If someone is eurasian and clubbish then they are fuggy. If someone is equivocal then they are unwearable. Doyle is not clubbish.", "logic": "\nUnwearable(doyle)\nEurasian(doyle)\nEquivocal(chas)\nHispanic(chas)\nUnwearable(chas)\nFuggy(chas)\nClubbish(chas)\nEurasian(chas)\nLivable(chas)\nEquivocal(ethel)\nFuggy(ethel)\nEurasian(ethel)\nUnwearable(ethel) -> Livable(ethel)\nforall x (Fuggy(x) -> Hispanic(x))\nforall x (Livable(x) -> Unwearable(x))\nforall x (Fuggy(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Eurasian(x))\nforall x (Eurasian(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Equivocal(x) -> Unwearable(x))\n\nnot Clubbish(doyle)\n\nnot Clubbish(doyle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Manuel is stitched. Manuel is permissive. Baldwin is professed. Baldwin is unnerving. Baldwin is stitched. Baldwin is broadloom. Baldwin is irksome. Baldwin is permissive. Baldwin is vexed. Lee is professed. Lee is broadloom. Lee is permissive. If Lee is stitched then Lee is vexed. All broadloom people are unnerving. All vexed people are stitched. Nice, irksome people are permissive. If someone is permissive and irksome then they are broadloom. If someone is professed then they are stitched. Manuel is vexed.", "logic": "\nStitched(manuel)\nPermissive(manuel)\nProfessed(baldwin)\nUnnerving(baldwin)\nStitched(baldwin)\nBroadloom(baldwin)\nIrksome(baldwin)\nPermissive(baldwin)\nVexed(baldwin)\nProfessed(lee)\nBroadloom(lee)\nPermissive(lee)\nStitched(lee) -> Vexed(lee)\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Vexed(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Broadloom(x) and Irksome(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Permissive(x) and Irksome(x) -> Broadloom(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) -> Stitched(x))\n\nVexed(manuel)\n\nVexed(manuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Bela is nilpotent. Bela is finnish. Johnny is tragic. Johnny is histologic. Johnny is nilpotent. Johnny is narrowing. Johnny is unruffled. Johnny is finnish. Johnny is oracular. Antoni is tragic. Antoni is narrowing. Antoni is finnish. If Antoni is nilpotent then Antoni is oracular. All narrowing people are histologic. All oracular people are nilpotent. Nice, unruffled people are finnish. If someone is finnish and unruffled then they are narrowing. If someone is tragic then they are nilpotent. Bela is not tragic.", "logic": "\nNilpotent(bela)\nFinnish(bela)\nTragic(johnny)\nHistologic(johnny)\nNilpotent(johnny)\nNarrowing(johnny)\nUnruffled(johnny)\nFinnish(johnny)\nOracular(johnny)\nTragic(antoni)\nNarrowing(antoni)\nFinnish(antoni)\nNilpotent(antoni) -> Oracular(antoni)\nforall x (Narrowing(x) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Nilpotent(x))\nforall x (Narrowing(x) and Unruffled(x) -> Finnish(x))\nforall x (Finnish(x) and Unruffled(x) -> Narrowing(x))\nforall x (Tragic(x) -> Nilpotent(x))\n\nnot Tragic(bela)\n\nnot Tragic(bela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Davida is colorful. Davida is sufferable. Lacey is unsubdued. Lacey is dead. Lacey is colorful. Lacey is subsonic. Lacey is devious. Lacey is sufferable. Lacey is peptic. Ava is unsubdued. Ava is subsonic. Ava is sufferable. If Ava is colorful then Ava is peptic. All subsonic people are dead. All peptic people are colorful. Nice, devious people are sufferable. If someone is sufferable and devious then they are subsonic. If someone is unsubdued then they are colorful. Ava is devious.", "logic": "\nColorful(davida)\nSufferable(davida)\nUnsubdued(lacey)\nDead(lacey)\nColorful(lacey)\nSubsonic(lacey)\nDevious(lacey)\nSufferable(lacey)\nPeptic(lacey)\nUnsubdued(ava)\nSubsonic(ava)\nSufferable(ava)\nColorful(ava) -> Peptic(ava)\nforall x (Subsonic(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Peptic(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Subsonic(x) and Devious(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Sufferable(x) and Devious(x) -> Subsonic(x))\nforall x (Unsubdued(x) -> Colorful(x))\n\nDevious(ava)\n\nDevious(ava) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Brea is kookie. Brea is synoptic. Brea is tasty. Meriel is kookie. Meriel is scalar. Meriel is tasty. Betti is synoptic. Betti is tasty. Betti is not heavenward. Paloma is tasty. If someone is tasty and postpaid then they are serpentine. If someone is scalar then they are postpaid. Betti is synoptic.", "logic": "\nKookie(brea)\nSynoptic(brea)\nTasty(brea)\nKookie(meriel)\nScalar(meriel)\nTasty(meriel)\nSynoptic(betti)\nTasty(betti)\nnot Heavenward(betti)\nTasty(paloma)\nforall x (Tasty(x) and Postpaid(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nforall x (Scalar(x) -> Postpaid(x))\n\nSynoptic(betti)\n\ntherefore Synoptic(betti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Zara is mauve. Zara is confusing. Zara is histologic. Judye is mauve. Judye is bromidic. Judye is histologic. Layla is confusing. Layla is histologic. Layla is not yogic. Joell is histologic. If someone is histologic and stockinged then they are consistent. If someone is bromidic then they are stockinged. Judye is not bromidic.", "logic": "\nMauve(zara)\nConfusing(zara)\nHistologic(zara)\nMauve(judye)\nBromidic(judye)\nHistologic(judye)\nConfusing(layla)\nHistologic(layla)\nnot Yogic(layla)\nHistologic(joell)\nforall x (Histologic(x) and Stockinged(x) -> Consistent(x))\nforall x (Bromidic(x) -> Stockinged(x))\n\nnot Bromidic(judye)\n\ntherefore Bromidic(judye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Arie is unmelted. Arie is noachian. Arie is executive. Lauree is unmelted. Lauree is hottish. Lauree is executive. Elicia is noachian. Elicia is executive. Elicia is not sluttish. Burt is executive. If someone is executive and abulic then they are disruptive. If someone is hottish then they are abulic. Lauree is abulic.", "logic": "\nUnmelted(arie)\nNoachian(arie)\nExecutive(arie)\nUnmelted(lauree)\nHottish(lauree)\nExecutive(lauree)\nNoachian(elicia)\nExecutive(elicia)\nnot Sluttish(elicia)\nExecutive(burt)\nforall x (Executive(x) and Abulic(x) -> Disruptive(x))\nforall x (Hottish(x) -> Abulic(x))\n\nAbulic(lauree)\n\nHottish(lauree) and forall x (Hottish(x) -> Abulic(x)) -> therefore Abulic(lauree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Elladine is copulative. Elladine is nosey. Elladine is varnished. Amery is copulative. Amery is knavish. Amery is varnished. Devan is nosey. Devan is varnished. Devan is not unsteady. Jabez is varnished. If someone is varnished and ceaseless then they are dispersed. If someone is knavish then they are ceaseless. Amery is not ceaseless.", "logic": "\nCopulative(elladine)\nNosey(elladine)\nVarnished(elladine)\nCopulative(amery)\nKnavish(amery)\nVarnished(amery)\nNosey(devan)\nVarnished(devan)\nnot Unsteady(devan)\nVarnished(jabez)\nforall x (Varnished(x) and Ceaseless(x) -> Dispersed(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> Ceaseless(x))\n\nnot Ceaseless(amery)\n\nKnavish(amery) and forall x (Knavish(x) -> Ceaseless(x)) -> therefore Ceaseless(amery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Edythe is peruked. Edythe is nutty. Edythe is going. Davis is peruked. Davis is auditive. Davis is going. Marney is nutty. Marney is going. Marney is not perpetual. Viviene is going. If someone is going and involved then they are needless. If someone is auditive then they are involved. Davis is needless.", "logic": "\nPeruked(edythe)\nNutty(edythe)\nGoing(edythe)\nPeruked(davis)\nAuditive(davis)\nGoing(davis)\nNutty(marney)\nGoing(marney)\nnot Perpetual(marney)\nGoing(viviene)\nforall x (Going(x) and Involved(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Auditive(x) -> Involved(x))\n\nNeedless(davis)\n\nAuditive(davis) and forall x (Auditive(x) -> Involved(x)) -> therefore Involved(davis) Going(davis) and Involved(davis) and forall x (Going(x) and Involved(x) -> Needless(x)) -> therefore Needless(davis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Myna is redeemable. Myna is paunchy. Myna is caring. Lissa is redeemable. Lissa is senecan. Lissa is caring. Karylin is paunchy. Karylin is caring. Karylin is not monovular. Sandra is caring. If someone is caring and habitable then they are botchy. If someone is senecan then they are habitable. Lissa is not botchy.", "logic": "\nRedeemable(myna)\nPaunchy(myna)\nCaring(myna)\nRedeemable(lissa)\nSenecan(lissa)\nCaring(lissa)\nPaunchy(karylin)\nCaring(karylin)\nnot Monovular(karylin)\nCaring(sandra)\nforall x (Caring(x) and Habitable(x) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Habitable(x))\n\nnot Botchy(lissa)\n\nSenecan(lissa) and forall x (Senecan(x) -> Habitable(x)) -> therefore Habitable(lissa) Caring(lissa) and Habitable(lissa) and forall x (Caring(x) and Habitable(x) -> Botchy(x)) -> therefore Botchy(lissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Rik is maniac. Rik is celluloid. Rik is foliaged. Anny is maniac. Anny is haywire. Anny is foliaged. Morganne is celluloid. Morganne is foliaged. Morganne is not adroit. Thain is foliaged. If someone is foliaged and caucasic then they are overmodest. If someone is haywire then they are caucasic. Thain is not caucasic.", "logic": "\nManiac(rik)\nCelluloid(rik)\nFoliaged(rik)\nManiac(anny)\nHaywire(anny)\nFoliaged(anny)\nCelluloid(morganne)\nFoliaged(morganne)\nnot Adroit(morganne)\nFoliaged(thain)\nforall x (Foliaged(x) and Caucasic(x) -> Overmodest(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Caucasic(x))\n\nnot Caucasic(thain)\n\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Caucasic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Goddart is throaty. Goddart is kokka. Goddart is threadbare. Anallese is throaty. Anallese is mini. Anallese is threadbare. Vince is kokka. Vince is threadbare. Vince is not beetle. Benetta is threadbare. If someone is threadbare and ammino then they are gooselike. If someone is mini then they are ammino. Benetta is gooselike.", "logic": "\nThroaty(goddart)\nKokka(goddart)\nThreadbare(goddart)\nThroaty(anallese)\nMini(anallese)\nThreadbare(anallese)\nKokka(vince)\nThreadbare(vince)\nnot Beetle(vince)\nThreadbare(benetta)\nforall x (Threadbare(x) and Ammino(x) -> Gooselike(x))\nforall x (Mini(x) -> Ammino(x))\n\nGooselike(benetta)\n\nforall x (Threadbare(x) and Ammino(x) -> Gooselike(x)) <- forall x (Mini(x) -> Ammino(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Leanna is stringent. Leanna is hominian. Leanna is coveted. Puff is stringent. Puff is whirring. Puff is coveted. Boyce is hominian. Boyce is coveted. Boyce is not arterial. Aziz is coveted. If someone is coveted and nitwitted then they are puzzling. If someone is whirring then they are nitwitted. Leanna is not nitwitted.", "logic": "\nStringent(leanna)\nHominian(leanna)\nCoveted(leanna)\nStringent(puff)\nWhirring(puff)\nCoveted(puff)\nHominian(boyce)\nCoveted(boyce)\nnot Arterial(boyce)\nCoveted(aziz)\nforall x (Coveted(x) and Nitwitted(x) -> Puzzling(x))\nforall x (Whirring(x) -> Nitwitted(x))\n\nnot Nitwitted(leanna)\n\nforall x (Whirring(x) -> Nitwitted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Belita is intoned. Belita is hifalutin. Belita is lxxv. Kayla is intoned. Kayla is linnean. Kayla is lxxv. Vivianne is hifalutin. Vivianne is lxxv. Vivianne is not oral. Mario is lxxv. If someone is lxxv and egyptian then they are martian. If someone is linnean then they are egyptian. Vivianne is intoned.", "logic": "\nIntoned(belita)\nHifalutin(belita)\nLxxv(belita)\nIntoned(kayla)\nLinnean(kayla)\nLxxv(kayla)\nHifalutin(vivianne)\nLxxv(vivianne)\nnot Oral(vivianne)\nLxxv(mario)\nforall x (Lxxv(x) and Egyptian(x) -> Martian(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) -> Egyptian(x))\n\nIntoned(vivianne)\n\nIntoned(vivianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Theresina is bedrid. Theresina is rousseauan. Theresina is hind. Grata is bedrid. Grata is seamed. Grata is hind. Katya is rousseauan. Katya is hind. Katya is not cespitose. Urbano is hind. If someone is hind and individual then they are biotitic. If someone is seamed then they are individual. Grata is not cespitose.", "logic": "\nBedrid(theresina)\nRousseauan(theresina)\nHind(theresina)\nBedrid(grata)\nSeamed(grata)\nHind(grata)\nRousseauan(katya)\nHind(katya)\nnot Cespitose(katya)\nHind(urbano)\nforall x (Hind(x) and Individual(x) -> Biotitic(x))\nforall x (Seamed(x) -> Individual(x))\n\nnot Cespitose(grata)\n\nnot Cespitose(grata) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Putnam is reachable. Putnam is motorial. Putnam is talkative. Mervin is reachable. Mervin is corrigible. Mervin is talkative. Zelig is motorial. Zelig is talkative. Zelig is not coveted. Danita is talkative. If someone is talkative and windless then they are loath. If someone is corrigible then they are windless. Mervin is motorial.", "logic": "\nReachable(putnam)\nMotorial(putnam)\nTalkative(putnam)\nReachable(mervin)\nCorrigible(mervin)\nTalkative(mervin)\nMotorial(zelig)\nTalkative(zelig)\nnot Coveted(zelig)\nTalkative(danita)\nforall x (Talkative(x) and Windless(x) -> Loath(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) -> Windless(x))\n\nMotorial(mervin)\n\nMotorial(mervin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "The blanca is not washed. The blanca screw the ignazio. The thadeus trace the blanca. The thadeus is frolicky. The thadeus is not belittling. The thadeus screw the sisely. The sisely is mosstone. The sisely is husbandly. The sisely is frolicky. The sisely is belittling. The sisely bollix the ignazio. The sisely screw the blanca. The ignazio is husbandly. The ignazio is frolicky. The ignazio bollix the sisely. The ignazio screw the sisely. If someone screw the sisely then they eat the thadeus. If someone trace the thadeus then the thadeus is husbandly. The ignazio bollix the sisely.", "logic": "\nnot Washed(blanca)\nScrew(blanca, ignazio)\nTrace(thadeus, blanca)\nFrolicky(thadeus)\nnot Belittling(thadeus)\nScrew(thadeus, sisely)\nMosstone(sisely)\nHusbandly(sisely)\nFrolicky(sisely)\nBelittling(sisely)\nBollix(sisely, ignazio)\nScrew(sisely, blanca)\nHusbandly(ignazio)\nFrolicky(ignazio)\nBollix(ignazio, sisely)\nScrew(ignazio, sisely)\nforall x (Screw(x, sisely) -> Trace(x, thadeus))\nforall x (Trace(x, thadeus) -> Husbandly(thadeus))\n\nBollix(ignazio, sisely)\n\ntherefore Bollix(ignazio, sisely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The valry is not millennial. The valry jellify the felicdad. The othelia huddle the valry. The othelia is graduate. The othelia is not wartlike. The othelia jellify the lewis. The lewis is hotheaded. The lewis is pectoral. The lewis is graduate. The lewis is wartlike. The lewis muscle the felicdad. The lewis jellify the valry. The felicdad is pectoral. The felicdad is graduate. The felicdad muscle the lewis. The felicdad jellify the lewis. If someone jellify the lewis then they eat the othelia. If someone huddle the othelia then the othelia is pectoral. The felicdad is not graduate.", "logic": "\nnot Millennial(valry)\nJellify(valry, felicdad)\nHuddle(othelia, valry)\nGraduate(othelia)\nnot Wartlike(othelia)\nJellify(othelia, lewis)\nHotheaded(lewis)\nPectoral(lewis)\nGraduate(lewis)\nWartlike(lewis)\nMuscle(lewis, felicdad)\nJellify(lewis, valry)\nPectoral(felicdad)\nGraduate(felicdad)\nMuscle(felicdad, lewis)\nJellify(felicdad, lewis)\nforall x (Jellify(x, lewis) -> Huddle(x, othelia))\nforall x (Huddle(x, othelia) -> Pectoral(othelia))\n\nnot Graduate(felicdad)\n\ntherefore Graduate(felicdad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The luelle is not moldovan. The luelle teach the corrianne. The dona rootle the luelle. The dona is submersed. The dona is not prosodic. The dona teach the marius. The marius is unlamented. The marius is theatrical. The marius is submersed. The marius is prosodic. The marius winter the corrianne. The marius teach the luelle. The corrianne is theatrical. The corrianne is submersed. The corrianne winter the marius. The corrianne teach the marius. If someone teach the marius then they eat the dona. If someone rootle the dona then the dona is theatrical. The dona rootle the dona.", "logic": "\nnot Moldovan(luelle)\nTeach(luelle, corrianne)\nRootle(dona, luelle)\nSubmersed(dona)\nnot Prosodic(dona)\nTeach(dona, marius)\nUnlamented(marius)\nTheatrical(marius)\nSubmersed(marius)\nProsodic(marius)\nWinter(marius, corrianne)\nTeach(marius, luelle)\nTheatrical(corrianne)\nSubmersed(corrianne)\nWinter(corrianne, marius)\nTeach(corrianne, marius)\nforall x (Teach(x, marius) -> Rootle(x, dona))\nforall x (Rootle(x, dona) -> Theatrical(dona))\n\nRootle(dona, dona)\n\nTeach(dona, marius) and forall x (Teach(x, marius) -> Rootle(x, dona)) -> therefore Rootle(dona, dona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The wye is not autogamic. The wye gird the dominick. The ronalda yield the wye. The ronalda is vulturous. The ronalda is not bluff. The ronalda gird the gerta. The gerta is aboriginal. The gerta is surpliced. The gerta is vulturous. The gerta is bluff. The gerta prevail the dominick. The gerta gird the wye. The dominick is surpliced. The dominick is vulturous. The dominick prevail the gerta. The dominick gird the gerta. If someone gird the gerta then they eat the ronalda. If someone yield the ronalda then the ronalda is surpliced. The dominick does not eat the ronalda.", "logic": "\nnot Autogamic(wye)\nGird(wye, dominick)\nYield(ronalda, wye)\nVulturous(ronalda)\nnot Bluff(ronalda)\nGird(ronalda, gerta)\nAboriginal(gerta)\nSurpliced(gerta)\nVulturous(gerta)\nBluff(gerta)\nPrevail(gerta, dominick)\nGird(gerta, wye)\nSurpliced(dominick)\nVulturous(dominick)\nPrevail(dominick, gerta)\nGird(dominick, gerta)\nforall x (Gird(x, gerta) -> Yield(x, ronalda))\nforall x (Yield(x, ronalda) -> Surpliced(ronalda))\n\nnot Yield(dominick, ronalda)\n\nGird(dominick, gerta) and forall x (Gird(x, gerta) -> Yield(x, ronalda)) -> therefore Yield(dominick, ronalda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The reza is not according. The reza disrespect the carmella. The phillis astringe the reza. The phillis is medicative. The phillis is not clonic. The phillis disrespect the nelia. The nelia is agnatic. The nelia is resilient. The nelia is medicative. The nelia is clonic. The nelia detrain the carmella. The nelia disrespect the reza. The carmella is resilient. The carmella is medicative. The carmella detrain the nelia. The carmella disrespect the nelia. If someone disrespect the nelia then they eat the phillis. If someone astringe the phillis then the phillis is resilient. The phillis is resilient.", "logic": "\nnot According(reza)\nDisrespect(reza, carmella)\nAstringe(phillis, reza)\nMedicative(phillis)\nnot Clonic(phillis)\nDisrespect(phillis, nelia)\nAgnatic(nelia)\nResilient(nelia)\nMedicative(nelia)\nClonic(nelia)\nDetrain(nelia, carmella)\nDisrespect(nelia, reza)\nResilient(carmella)\nMedicative(carmella)\nDetrain(carmella, nelia)\nDisrespect(carmella, nelia)\nforall x (Disrespect(x, nelia) -> Astringe(x, phillis))\nforall x (Astringe(x, phillis) -> Resilient(phillis))\n\nResilient(phillis)\n\nDisrespect(carmella, nelia) and forall x (Disrespect(x, nelia) -> Astringe(x, phillis)) -> therefore Astringe(carmella, phillis) Astringe(carmella, phillis) and forall x (Astringe(x, phillis) -> Resilient(phillis)) -> therefore Resilient(phillis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The gerome is not vacuolated. The gerome bath the talia. The roanne rival the gerome. The roanne is summery. The roanne is not amort. The roanne bath the paula. The paula is unbaptized. The paula is oriented. The paula is summery. The paula is amort. The paula reprieve the talia. The paula bath the gerome. The talia is oriented. The talia is summery. The talia reprieve the paula. The talia bath the paula. If someone bath the paula then they eat the roanne. If someone rival the roanne then the roanne is oriented. The roanne is not oriented.", "logic": "\nnot Vacuolated(gerome)\nBath(gerome, talia)\nRival(roanne, gerome)\nSummery(roanne)\nnot Amort(roanne)\nBath(roanne, paula)\nUnbaptized(paula)\nOriented(paula)\nSummery(paula)\nAmort(paula)\nReprieve(paula, talia)\nBath(paula, gerome)\nOriented(talia)\nSummery(talia)\nReprieve(talia, paula)\nBath(talia, paula)\nforall x (Bath(x, paula) -> Rival(x, roanne))\nforall x (Rival(x, roanne) -> Oriented(roanne))\n\nnot Oriented(roanne)\n\nBath(talia, paula) and forall x (Bath(x, paula) -> Rival(x, roanne)) -> therefore Rival(talia, roanne) Rival(talia, roanne) and forall x (Rival(x, roanne) -> Oriented(roanne)) -> therefore Oriented(roanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The evita is not farther. The evita convert the hertha. The issie deepen the evita. The issie is apostolic. The issie is not spiffing. The issie convert the audra. The audra is trousered. The audra is soundproof. The audra is apostolic. The audra is spiffing. The audra retch the hertha. The audra convert the evita. The hertha is soundproof. The hertha is apostolic. The hertha retch the audra. The hertha convert the audra. If someone convert the audra then they eat the issie. If someone deepen the issie then the issie is soundproof. The audra does not eat the issie.", "logic": "\nnot Farther(evita)\nConvert(evita, hertha)\nDeepen(issie, evita)\nApostolic(issie)\nnot Spiffing(issie)\nConvert(issie, audra)\nTrousered(audra)\nSoundproof(audra)\nApostolic(audra)\nSpiffing(audra)\nRetch(audra, hertha)\nConvert(audra, evita)\nSoundproof(hertha)\nApostolic(hertha)\nRetch(hertha, audra)\nConvert(hertha, audra)\nforall x (Convert(x, audra) -> Deepen(x, issie))\nforall x (Deepen(x, issie) -> Soundproof(issie))\n\nnot Deepen(audra, issie)\n\nforall x (Convert(x, audra) -> Deepen(x, issie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The maribel is not demotic. The maribel shame the keefe. The merrill commission the maribel. The merrill is sapient. The merrill is not borderline. The merrill shame the marlena. The marlena is vixenish. The marlena is corinthian. The marlena is sapient. The marlena is borderline. The marlena tribulate the keefe. The marlena shame the maribel. The keefe is corinthian. The keefe is sapient. The keefe tribulate the marlena. The keefe shame the marlena. If someone shame the marlena then they eat the merrill. If someone commission the merrill then the merrill is corinthian. The maribel commission the merrill.", "logic": "\nnot Demotic(maribel)\nShame(maribel, keefe)\nCommission(merrill, maribel)\nSapient(merrill)\nnot Borderline(merrill)\nShame(merrill, marlena)\nVixenish(marlena)\nCorinthian(marlena)\nSapient(marlena)\nBorderline(marlena)\nTribulate(marlena, keefe)\nShame(marlena, maribel)\nCorinthian(keefe)\nSapient(keefe)\nTribulate(keefe, marlena)\nShame(keefe, marlena)\nforall x (Shame(x, marlena) -> Commission(x, merrill))\nforall x (Commission(x, merrill) -> Corinthian(merrill))\n\nCommission(maribel, merrill)\n\nforall x (Shame(x, marlena) -> Commission(x, merrill)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The leanna is not cinnabar. The leanna start the selby. The minda stereotype the leanna. The minda is cheerful. The minda is not phosphoric. The minda start the malkah. The malkah is humbled. The malkah is ischemic. The malkah is cheerful. The malkah is phosphoric. The malkah finalize the selby. The malkah start the leanna. The selby is ischemic. The selby is cheerful. The selby finalize the malkah. The selby start the malkah. If someone start the malkah then they eat the minda. If someone stereotype the minda then the minda is ischemic. The leanna does not need the minda.", "logic": "\nnot Cinnabar(leanna)\nStart(leanna, selby)\nStereotype(minda, leanna)\nCheerful(minda)\nnot Phosphoric(minda)\nStart(minda, malkah)\nHumbled(malkah)\nIschemic(malkah)\nCheerful(malkah)\nPhosphoric(malkah)\nFinalize(malkah, selby)\nStart(malkah, leanna)\nIschemic(selby)\nCheerful(selby)\nFinalize(selby, malkah)\nStart(selby, malkah)\nforall x (Start(x, malkah) -> Stereotype(x, minda))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, minda) -> Ischemic(minda))\n\nnot Start(leanna, minda)\n\nnot Start(leanna, minda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The timotheus is not unheated. The timotheus readapt the natasha. The rozalie effectuate the timotheus. The rozalie is well. The rozalie is not mandaean. The rozalie readapt the linda. The linda is canonised. The linda is automatic. The linda is well. The linda is mandaean. The linda postdate the natasha. The linda readapt the timotheus. The natasha is automatic. The natasha is well. The natasha postdate the linda. The natasha readapt the linda. If someone readapt the linda then they eat the rozalie. If someone effectuate the rozalie then the rozalie is automatic. The timotheus readapt the timotheus.", "logic": "\nnot Unheated(timotheus)\nReadapt(timotheus, natasha)\nEffectuate(rozalie, timotheus)\nWell(rozalie)\nnot Mandaean(rozalie)\nReadapt(rozalie, linda)\nCanonised(linda)\nAutomatic(linda)\nWell(linda)\nMandaean(linda)\nPostdate(linda, natasha)\nReadapt(linda, timotheus)\nAutomatic(natasha)\nWell(natasha)\nPostdate(natasha, linda)\nReadapt(natasha, linda)\nforall x (Readapt(x, linda) -> Effectuate(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, rozalie) -> Automatic(rozalie))\n\nReadapt(timotheus, timotheus)\n\nReadapt(timotheus, timotheus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The karna is not pyrogallic. The karna redevelop the adam. The legra dice the karna. The legra is favourable. The legra is not vanished. The legra redevelop the kris. The kris is zymolytic. The kris is weird. The kris is favourable. The kris is vanished. The kris novelize the adam. The kris redevelop the karna. The adam is weird. The adam is favourable. The adam novelize the kris. The adam redevelop the kris. If someone redevelop the kris then they eat the legra. If someone dice the legra then the legra is weird. The karna does not like the kris.", "logic": "\nnot Pyrogallic(karna)\nRedevelop(karna, adam)\nDice(legra, karna)\nFavourable(legra)\nnot Vanished(legra)\nRedevelop(legra, kris)\nZymolytic(kris)\nWeird(kris)\nFavourable(kris)\nVanished(kris)\nNovelize(kris, adam)\nRedevelop(kris, karna)\nWeird(adam)\nFavourable(adam)\nNovelize(adam, kris)\nRedevelop(adam, kris)\nforall x (Redevelop(x, kris) -> Dice(x, legra))\nforall x (Dice(x, legra) -> Weird(legra))\n\nnot Novelize(karna, kris)\n\nnot Novelize(karna, kris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "The kacey is not renegade. The kacey forestall the moyra. The lona decrypt the kacey. The lona is sleepy. The lona is not tyrolean. The lona forestall the essa. The essa is hymeneal. The essa is tanned. The essa is sleepy. The essa is tyrolean. The essa checkrow the moyra. The essa forestall the kacey. The moyra is tanned. The moyra is sleepy. The moyra checkrow the essa. The moyra forestall the essa. If someone forestall the essa then they eat the lona. If someone decrypt the lona then the lona is tanned. The essa checkrow the essa.", "logic": "\nnot Renegade(kacey)\nForestall(kacey, moyra)\nDecrypt(lona, kacey)\nSleepy(lona)\nnot Tyrolean(lona)\nForestall(lona, essa)\nHymeneal(essa)\nTanned(essa)\nSleepy(essa)\nTyrolean(essa)\nCheckrow(essa, moyra)\nForestall(essa, kacey)\nTanned(moyra)\nSleepy(moyra)\nCheckrow(moyra, essa)\nForestall(moyra, essa)\nforall x (Forestall(x, essa) -> Decrypt(x, lona))\nforall x (Decrypt(x, lona) -> Tanned(lona))\n\nCheckrow(essa, essa)\n\nCheckrow(essa, essa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-421"} {"premises": "Chip is spacial. Roth is puckish. Alfonse is not puckish. Francesco is not spacial. Cold things are fluent. Nice things are fluent. If Francesco is puckish then Francesco is cespitose. All puckish, cespitose things are gainly. All puckish things are gainly. If Roth is not gainly then Roth is spacial. Roth is puckish.", "logic": "\nSpacial(chip)\nPuckish(roth)\nnot Puckish(alfonse)\nnot Spacial(francesco)\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> Fluent(x))\nforall x (Cespitose(x) -> Fluent(x))\nPuckish(francesco) -> Cespitose(francesco)\nforall x (Puckish(x) and Cespitose(x) -> Gainly(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Gainly(x))\nnot Gainly(roth) -> Spacial(roth)\n\nPuckish(roth)\n\ntherefore Puckish(roth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Glynnis is textile. Charlean is medullated. Pascal is not medullated. Robert is not textile. Cold things are blubbery. Nice things are blubbery. If Robert is medullated then Robert is unplayful. All medullated, unplayful things are debile. All medullated things are debile. If Charlean is not debile then Charlean is textile. Robert is textile.", "logic": "\nTextile(glynnis)\nMedullated(charlean)\nnot Medullated(pascal)\nnot Textile(robert)\nforall x (Debile(x) -> Blubbery(x))\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Blubbery(x))\nMedullated(robert) -> Unplayful(robert)\nforall x (Medullated(x) and Unplayful(x) -> Debile(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Debile(x))\nnot Debile(charlean) -> Textile(charlean)\n\nTextile(robert)\n\ntherefore not Textile(robert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Welby is folksy. Eberhard is tenuous. Gill is not tenuous. Corrinne is not folksy. Cold things are abloom. Nice things are abloom. If Corrinne is tenuous then Corrinne is knobby. All tenuous, knobby things are enhancive. All tenuous things are enhancive. If Eberhard is not enhancive then Eberhard is folksy. Eberhard is enhancive.", "logic": "\nFolksy(welby)\nTenuous(eberhard)\nnot Tenuous(gill)\nnot Folksy(corrinne)\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Abloom(x))\nforall x (Knobby(x) -> Abloom(x))\nTenuous(corrinne) -> Knobby(corrinne)\nforall x (Tenuous(x) and Knobby(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nnot Enhancive(eberhard) -> Folksy(eberhard)\n\nEnhancive(eberhard)\n\nTenuous(eberhard) and forall x (Tenuous(x) -> Enhancive(x)) -> therefore Enhancive(eberhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Yolanthe is nude. Katalin is bibless. Roselia is not bibless. Hedwig is not nude. Cold things are marauding. Nice things are marauding. If Hedwig is bibless then Hedwig is violable. All bibless, violable things are legato. All bibless things are legato. If Katalin is not legato then Katalin is nude. Katalin is not legato.", "logic": "\nNude(yolanthe)\nBibless(katalin)\nnot Bibless(roselia)\nnot Nude(hedwig)\nforall x (Legato(x) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) -> Marauding(x))\nBibless(hedwig) -> Violable(hedwig)\nforall x (Bibless(x) and Violable(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Bibless(x) -> Legato(x))\nnot Legato(katalin) -> Nude(katalin)\n\nnot Legato(katalin)\n\nBibless(katalin) and forall x (Bibless(x) -> Legato(x)) -> therefore Legato(katalin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Ginger is economical. Dorthea is sanative. Billy is not sanative. Ardis is not economical. Cold things are beetle. Nice things are beetle. If Ardis is sanative then Ardis is esurient. All sanative, esurient things are antitrust. All sanative things are antitrust. If Dorthea is not antitrust then Dorthea is economical. Dorthea is beetle.", "logic": "\nEconomical(ginger)\nSanative(dorthea)\nnot Sanative(billy)\nnot Economical(ardis)\nforall x (Antitrust(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Esurient(x) -> Beetle(x))\nSanative(ardis) -> Esurient(ardis)\nforall x (Sanative(x) and Esurient(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nforall x (Sanative(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nnot Antitrust(dorthea) -> Economical(dorthea)\n\nBeetle(dorthea)\n\nSanative(dorthea) and forall x (Sanative(x) -> Antitrust(x)) -> therefore Antitrust(dorthea) Antitrust(dorthea) and forall x (Antitrust(x) -> Beetle(x)) -> therefore Beetle(dorthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Bianca is undesiring. Brandie is conventual. Deina is not conventual. Marilin is not undesiring. Cold things are floppy. Nice things are floppy. If Marilin is conventual then Marilin is wasteful. All conventual, wasteful things are enervating. All conventual things are enervating. If Brandie is not enervating then Brandie is undesiring. Brandie is not floppy.", "logic": "\nUndesiring(bianca)\nConventual(brandie)\nnot Conventual(deina)\nnot Undesiring(marilin)\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Floppy(x))\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Floppy(x))\nConventual(marilin) -> Wasteful(marilin)\nforall x (Conventual(x) and Wasteful(x) -> Enervating(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Enervating(x))\nnot Enervating(brandie) -> Undesiring(brandie)\n\nnot Floppy(brandie)\n\nConventual(brandie) and forall x (Conventual(x) -> Enervating(x)) -> therefore Enervating(brandie) Enervating(brandie) and forall x (Enervating(x) -> Floppy(x)) -> therefore Floppy(brandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Burt is atrophic. Geeta is muscovite. Barron is not muscovite. Christian is not atrophic. Cold things are deadening. Nice things are deadening. If Christian is muscovite then Christian is ratty. All muscovite, ratty things are basinal. All muscovite things are basinal. If Geeta is not basinal then Geeta is atrophic. Christian is not basinal.", "logic": "\nAtrophic(burt)\nMuscovite(geeta)\nnot Muscovite(barron)\nnot Atrophic(christian)\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Deadening(x))\nforall x (Ratty(x) -> Deadening(x))\nMuscovite(christian) -> Ratty(christian)\nforall x (Muscovite(x) and Ratty(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Muscovite(x) -> Basinal(x))\nnot Basinal(geeta) -> Atrophic(geeta)\n\nnot Basinal(christian)\n\nforall x (Muscovite(x) and Ratty(x) -> Basinal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Merl is ornery. Andriana is expected. Filide is not expected. Inigo is not ornery. Cold things are spinnbar. Nice things are spinnbar. If Inigo is expected then Inigo is quits. All expected, quits things are cyprian. All expected things are cyprian. If Andriana is not cyprian then Andriana is ornery. Inigo is spinnbar.", "logic": "\nOrnery(merl)\nExpected(andriana)\nnot Expected(filide)\nnot Ornery(inigo)\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Spinnbar(x))\nforall x (Quits(x) -> Spinnbar(x))\nExpected(inigo) -> Quits(inigo)\nforall x (Expected(x) and Quits(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Expected(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nnot Cyprian(andriana) -> Ornery(andriana)\n\nSpinnbar(inigo)\n\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Spinnbar(x)) <- forall x (Expected(x) and Quits(x) -> Cyprian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Theodosia is initiatory. Edna is malarial. Jonathan is not malarial. Nita is not initiatory. Cold things are herbal. Nice things are herbal. If Nita is malarial then Nita is nonliteral. All malarial, nonliteral things are immense. All malarial things are immense. If Edna is not immense then Edna is initiatory. Theodosia is not herbal.", "logic": "\nInitiatory(theodosia)\nMalarial(edna)\nnot Malarial(jonathan)\nnot Initiatory(nita)\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Herbal(x))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Herbal(x))\nMalarial(nita) -> Nonliteral(nita)\nforall x (Malarial(x) and Nonliteral(x) -> Immense(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) -> Immense(x))\nnot Immense(edna) -> Initiatory(edna)\n\nnot Herbal(theodosia)\n\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Herbal(x)) <- forall x (Malarial(x) and Nonliteral(x) -> Immense(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Lenette is homicidal. Esma is thankful. Karly is not thankful. Fatima is not homicidal. Cold things are curst. Nice things are curst. If Fatima is thankful then Fatima is trilled. All thankful, trilled things are cosmologic. All thankful things are cosmologic. If Esma is not cosmologic then Esma is homicidal. Esma is green.", "logic": "\nHomicidal(lenette)\nThankful(esma)\nnot Thankful(karly)\nnot Homicidal(fatima)\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Curst(x))\nforall x (Trilled(x) -> Curst(x))\nThankful(fatima) -> Trilled(fatima)\nforall x (Thankful(x) and Trilled(x) -> Cosmologic(x))\nforall x (Thankful(x) -> Cosmologic(x))\nnot Cosmologic(esma) -> Homicidal(esma)\n\nGreen(esma)\n\nGreen(esma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Demetris is irritating. Welch is placatory. Jaquelin is not placatory. Nannie is not irritating. Cold things are tranquil. Nice things are tranquil. If Nannie is placatory then Nannie is apish. All placatory, apish things are bathyal. All placatory things are bathyal. If Welch is not bathyal then Welch is irritating. Jaquelin is not white.", "logic": "\nIrritating(demetris)\nPlacatory(welch)\nnot Placatory(jaquelin)\nnot Irritating(nannie)\nforall x (Bathyal(x) -> Tranquil(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) -> Tranquil(x))\nPlacatory(nannie) -> Apish(nannie)\nforall x (Placatory(x) and Apish(x) -> Bathyal(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) -> Bathyal(x))\nnot Bathyal(welch) -> Irritating(welch)\n\nnot White(jaquelin)\n\nnot White(jaquelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Helene is sporadic. Kira is starry. Korney is not starry. Arel is not sporadic. Cold things are fiery. Nice things are fiery. If Arel is starry then Arel is epidermic. All starry, epidermic things are scholastic. All starry things are scholastic. If Kira is not scholastic then Kira is sporadic. Kira is white.", "logic": "\nSporadic(helene)\nStarry(kira)\nnot Starry(korney)\nnot Sporadic(arel)\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) -> Fiery(x))\nStarry(arel) -> Epidermic(arel)\nforall x (Starry(x) and Epidermic(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nnot Scholastic(kira) -> Sporadic(kira)\n\nWhite(kira)\n\nWhite(kira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-124"} {"premises": "Lea is born. Lea is zairese. Anton is unlucky. Anton is inpouring. Anton is edged. Amaleta is zairese. Curt is adamant. Curt is not born. Curt is inpouring. Curt is not zairese. Curt is incoming. Curt is edged. If Anton is inpouring and Anton is unlucky then Anton is adamant. Big people are incoming. Blue, incoming people are adamant. Curt is not born.", "logic": "\nBorn(lea)\nZairese(lea)\nUnlucky(anton)\nInpouring(anton)\nEdged(anton)\nZairese(amaleta)\nAdamant(curt)\nnot Born(curt)\nInpouring(curt)\nnot Zairese(curt)\nIncoming(curt)\nEdged(curt)\nInpouring(anton) and Unlucky(anton) -> Adamant(anton)\nforall x (Adamant(x) -> Incoming(x))\nforall x (Born(x) and Incoming(x) -> Adamant(x))\n\nnot Born(curt)\n\ntherefore not Born(curt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Helena is muddy. Helena is steadied. Marice is piddling. Marice is slatey. Marice is beamy. Ora is steadied. Giffer is conceptual. Giffer is not muddy. Giffer is slatey. Giffer is not steadied. Giffer is legged. Giffer is beamy. If Marice is slatey and Marice is piddling then Marice is conceptual. Big people are legged. Blue, legged people are conceptual. Giffer is muddy.", "logic": "\nMuddy(helena)\nSteadied(helena)\nPiddling(marice)\nSlatey(marice)\nBeamy(marice)\nSteadied(ora)\nConceptual(giffer)\nnot Muddy(giffer)\nSlatey(giffer)\nnot Steadied(giffer)\nLegged(giffer)\nBeamy(giffer)\nSlatey(marice) and Piddling(marice) -> Conceptual(marice)\nforall x (Conceptual(x) -> Legged(x))\nforall x (Muddy(x) and Legged(x) -> Conceptual(x))\n\nMuddy(giffer)\n\ntherefore not Muddy(giffer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Nancy is procedural. Nancy is senile. Goldina is storeyed. Goldina is cavalier. Goldina is swanky. Angelo is senile. Jackie is enchanting. Jackie is not procedural. Jackie is cavalier. Jackie is not senile. Jackie is peripheral. Jackie is swanky. If Goldina is cavalier and Goldina is storeyed then Goldina is enchanting. Big people are peripheral. Blue, peripheral people are enchanting. Goldina is enchanting.", "logic": "\nProcedural(nancy)\nSenile(nancy)\nStoreyed(goldina)\nCavalier(goldina)\nSwanky(goldina)\nSenile(angelo)\nEnchanting(jackie)\nnot Procedural(jackie)\nCavalier(jackie)\nnot Senile(jackie)\nPeripheral(jackie)\nSwanky(jackie)\nCavalier(goldina) and Storeyed(goldina) -> Enchanting(goldina)\nforall x (Enchanting(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nforall x (Procedural(x) and Peripheral(x) -> Enchanting(x))\n\nEnchanting(goldina)\n\nCavalier(goldina) and Storeyed(goldina) and Cavalier(goldina) and Storeyed(goldina) -> Enchanting(goldina) -> therefore Enchanting(goldina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Carmelina is innocuous. Carmelina is grapy. Hagen is carbonic. Hagen is roast. Hagen is biennial. Nara is grapy. Lorene is sweptwing. Lorene is not innocuous. Lorene is roast. Lorene is not grapy. Lorene is unkempt. Lorene is biennial. If Hagen is roast and Hagen is carbonic then Hagen is sweptwing. Big people are unkempt. Blue, unkempt people are sweptwing. Hagen is not sweptwing.", "logic": "\nInnocuous(carmelina)\nGrapy(carmelina)\nCarbonic(hagen)\nRoast(hagen)\nBiennial(hagen)\nGrapy(nara)\nSweptwing(lorene)\nnot Innocuous(lorene)\nRoast(lorene)\nnot Grapy(lorene)\nUnkempt(lorene)\nBiennial(lorene)\nRoast(hagen) and Carbonic(hagen) -> Sweptwing(hagen)\nforall x (Sweptwing(x) -> Unkempt(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) and Unkempt(x) -> Sweptwing(x))\n\nnot Sweptwing(hagen)\n\nRoast(hagen) and Carbonic(hagen) and Roast(hagen) and Carbonic(hagen) -> Sweptwing(hagen) -> therefore Sweptwing(hagen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Ibby is uneatable. Ibby is fuggy. Nan is citric. Nan is passe. Nan is rotatory. Lisandra is fuggy. Imojean is asymmetric. Imojean is not uneatable. Imojean is passe. Imojean is not fuggy. Imojean is gracious. Imojean is rotatory. If Nan is passe and Nan is citric then Nan is asymmetric. Big people are gracious. Blue, gracious people are asymmetric. Nan is gracious.", "logic": "\nUneatable(ibby)\nFuggy(ibby)\nCitric(nan)\nPasse(nan)\nRotatory(nan)\nFuggy(lisandra)\nAsymmetric(imojean)\nnot Uneatable(imojean)\nPasse(imojean)\nnot Fuggy(imojean)\nGracious(imojean)\nRotatory(imojean)\nPasse(nan) and Citric(nan) -> Asymmetric(nan)\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) -> Gracious(x))\nforall x (Uneatable(x) and Gracious(x) -> Asymmetric(x))\n\nGracious(nan)\n\nPasse(nan) and Citric(nan) and Passe(nan) and Citric(nan) -> Asymmetric(nan) -> therefore Asymmetric(nan) Asymmetric(nan) and forall x (Asymmetric(x) -> Gracious(x)) -> therefore Gracious(nan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Lyndsey is xviii. Lyndsey is elfin. Sally is unthematic. Sally is medicinal. Sally is obsessed. Clareta is elfin. Mommy is proud. Mommy is not xviii. Mommy is medicinal. Mommy is not elfin. Mommy is valved. Mommy is obsessed. If Sally is medicinal and Sally is unthematic then Sally is proud. Big people are valved. Blue, valved people are proud. Sally is not valved.", "logic": "\nXviii(lyndsey)\nElfin(lyndsey)\nUnthematic(sally)\nMedicinal(sally)\nObsessed(sally)\nElfin(clareta)\nProud(mommy)\nnot Xviii(mommy)\nMedicinal(mommy)\nnot Elfin(mommy)\nValved(mommy)\nObsessed(mommy)\nMedicinal(sally) and Unthematic(sally) -> Proud(sally)\nforall x (Proud(x) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Xviii(x) and Valved(x) -> Proud(x))\n\nnot Valved(sally)\n\nMedicinal(sally) and Unthematic(sally) and Medicinal(sally) and Unthematic(sally) -> Proud(sally) -> therefore Proud(sally) Proud(sally) and forall x (Proud(x) -> Valved(x)) -> therefore Valved(sally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Englebart is varnished. Englebart is voluble. Bride is unstressed. Bride is pushy. Bride is jovial. Herold is voluble. Cara is indiscreet. Cara is not varnished. Cara is pushy. Cara is not voluble. Cara is caespitose. Cara is jovial. If Bride is pushy and Bride is unstressed then Bride is indiscreet. Big people are caespitose. Blue, caespitose people are indiscreet. Englebart is not caespitose.", "logic": "\nVarnished(englebart)\nVoluble(englebart)\nUnstressed(bride)\nPushy(bride)\nJovial(bride)\nVoluble(herold)\nIndiscreet(cara)\nnot Varnished(cara)\nPushy(cara)\nnot Voluble(cara)\nCaespitose(cara)\nJovial(cara)\nPushy(bride) and Unstressed(bride) -> Indiscreet(bride)\nforall x (Indiscreet(x) -> Caespitose(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) and Caespitose(x) -> Indiscreet(x))\n\nnot Caespitose(englebart)\n\nforall x (Indiscreet(x) -> Caespitose(x)) <- forall x (Varnished(x) and Caespitose(x) -> Indiscreet(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Deloris is mythologic. Deloris is armoured. Kelcy is castrated. Kelcy is malevolent. Kelcy is exorbitant. Ardelle is armoured. Janna is indictable. Janna is not mythologic. Janna is malevolent. Janna is not armoured. Janna is splashed. Janna is exorbitant. If Kelcy is malevolent and Kelcy is castrated then Kelcy is indictable. Big people are splashed. Blue, splashed people are indictable. Deloris is indictable.", "logic": "\nMythologic(deloris)\nArmoured(deloris)\nCastrated(kelcy)\nMalevolent(kelcy)\nExorbitant(kelcy)\nArmoured(ardelle)\nIndictable(janna)\nnot Mythologic(janna)\nMalevolent(janna)\nnot Armoured(janna)\nSplashed(janna)\nExorbitant(janna)\nMalevolent(kelcy) and Castrated(kelcy) -> Indictable(kelcy)\nforall x (Indictable(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Splashed(x) -> Indictable(x))\n\nIndictable(deloris)\n\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Splashed(x) -> Indictable(x)) <- forall x (Indictable(x) -> Splashed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Fiorenze is admired. Fiorenze is noxious. Sting is xxix. Sting is guiding. Sting is pyrogenous. Frederica is noxious. Paulie is warning. Paulie is not admired. Paulie is guiding. Paulie is not noxious. Paulie is licensed. Paulie is pyrogenous. If Sting is guiding and Sting is xxix then Sting is warning. Big people are licensed. Blue, licensed people are warning. Frederica is not warning.", "logic": "\nAdmired(fiorenze)\nNoxious(fiorenze)\nXxix(sting)\nGuiding(sting)\nPyrogenous(sting)\nNoxious(frederica)\nWarning(paulie)\nnot Admired(paulie)\nGuiding(paulie)\nnot Noxious(paulie)\nLicensed(paulie)\nPyrogenous(paulie)\nGuiding(sting) and Xxix(sting) -> Warning(sting)\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) and Licensed(x) -> Warning(x))\n\nnot Warning(frederica)\n\nforall x (Admired(x) and Licensed(x) -> Warning(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Kassi is aligned. Kassi is lymphatic. Esta is haywire. Esta is upcoming. Esta is vocal. Kingsley is lymphatic. Maddalena is puffy. Maddalena is not aligned. Maddalena is upcoming. Maddalena is not lymphatic. Maddalena is abhorrent. Maddalena is vocal. If Esta is upcoming and Esta is haywire then Esta is puffy. Big people are abhorrent. Blue, abhorrent people are puffy. Kingsley is haywire.", "logic": "\nAligned(kassi)\nLymphatic(kassi)\nHaywire(esta)\nUpcoming(esta)\nVocal(esta)\nLymphatic(kingsley)\nPuffy(maddalena)\nnot Aligned(maddalena)\nUpcoming(maddalena)\nnot Lymphatic(maddalena)\nAbhorrent(maddalena)\nVocal(maddalena)\nUpcoming(esta) and Haywire(esta) -> Puffy(esta)\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Abhorrent(x))\nforall x (Aligned(x) and Abhorrent(x) -> Puffy(x))\n\nHaywire(kingsley)\n\nHaywire(kingsley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Deeanne is finer. Deeanne is placed. Friedric is disastrous. Friedric is declarable. Friedric is rickety. Katharyn is placed. Muffin is swollen. Muffin is not finer. Muffin is declarable. Muffin is not placed. Muffin is undynamic. Muffin is rickety. If Friedric is declarable and Friedric is disastrous then Friedric is swollen. Big people are undynamic. Blue, undynamic people are swollen. Friedric is not placed.", "logic": "\nFiner(deeanne)\nPlaced(deeanne)\nDisastrous(friedric)\nDeclarable(friedric)\nRickety(friedric)\nPlaced(katharyn)\nSwollen(muffin)\nnot Finer(muffin)\nDeclarable(muffin)\nnot Placed(muffin)\nUndynamic(muffin)\nRickety(muffin)\nDeclarable(friedric) and Disastrous(friedric) -> Swollen(friedric)\nforall x (Swollen(x) -> Undynamic(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) and Undynamic(x) -> Swollen(x))\n\nnot Placed(friedric)\n\nnot Placed(friedric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Florance is incident. Florance is gushing. Devonna is redoubled. Devonna is oozing. Devonna is puff. Karrah is gushing. Lita is topped. Lita is not incident. Lita is oozing. Lita is not gushing. Lita is disjoined. Lita is puff. If Devonna is oozing and Devonna is redoubled then Devonna is topped. Big people are disjoined. Blue, disjoined people are topped. Florance is redoubled.", "logic": "\nIncident(florance)\nGushing(florance)\nRedoubled(devonna)\nOozing(devonna)\nPuff(devonna)\nGushing(karrah)\nTopped(lita)\nnot Incident(lita)\nOozing(lita)\nnot Gushing(lita)\nDisjoined(lita)\nPuff(lita)\nOozing(devonna) and Redoubled(devonna) -> Topped(devonna)\nforall x (Topped(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Incident(x) and Disjoined(x) -> Topped(x))\n\nRedoubled(florance)\n\nRedoubled(florance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Trace is jocose. Trace is seeming. Trace is lettered. Trace is lxxxvii. Trace is subsequent. Cherise is jocose. Cherise is immiscible. Cherise is styptic. Cherise is lettered. Cherise is lxxxvii. Cherise is subsequent. Bridgett is jocose. Bridgett is styptic. Bridgett is seeming. Bridgett is lxxxvii. Bridgett is subsequent. If something is seeming and styptic then it is immiscible. Young, lettered things are lxxxvii. If something is seeming and lettered then it is styptic. Trace is seeming.", "logic": "\nJocose(trace)\nSeeming(trace)\nLettered(trace)\nLxxxvii(trace)\nSubsequent(trace)\nJocose(cherise)\nImmiscible(cherise)\nStyptic(cherise)\nLettered(cherise)\nLxxxvii(cherise)\nSubsequent(cherise)\nJocose(bridgett)\nStyptic(bridgett)\nSeeming(bridgett)\nLxxxvii(bridgett)\nSubsequent(bridgett)\nforall x (Seeming(x) and Styptic(x) -> Immiscible(x))\nforall x (Subsequent(x) and Lettered(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Seeming(x) and Lettered(x) -> Styptic(x))\n\nSeeming(trace)\n\ntherefore Seeming(trace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Tonia is vegetive. Tonia is uproarious. Tonia is plaintive. Tonia is venerable. Tonia is barmy. Kylie is vegetive. Kylie is unfading. Kylie is incan. Kylie is plaintive. Kylie is venerable. Kylie is barmy. Emmet is vegetive. Emmet is incan. Emmet is uproarious. Emmet is venerable. Emmet is barmy. If something is uproarious and incan then it is unfading. Young, plaintive things are venerable. If something is uproarious and plaintive then it is incan. Emmet is not incan.", "logic": "\nVegetive(tonia)\nUproarious(tonia)\nPlaintive(tonia)\nVenerable(tonia)\nBarmy(tonia)\nVegetive(kylie)\nUnfading(kylie)\nIncan(kylie)\nPlaintive(kylie)\nVenerable(kylie)\nBarmy(kylie)\nVegetive(emmet)\nIncan(emmet)\nUproarious(emmet)\nVenerable(emmet)\nBarmy(emmet)\nforall x (Uproarious(x) and Incan(x) -> Unfading(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) and Plaintive(x) -> Venerable(x))\nforall x (Uproarious(x) and Plaintive(x) -> Incan(x))\n\nnot Incan(emmet)\n\ntherefore Incan(emmet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Luci is nonfat. Luci is quixotic. Luci is conniving. Luci is adjustive. Luci is depictive. Ekaterina is nonfat. Ekaterina is nebulose. Ekaterina is rash. Ekaterina is conniving. Ekaterina is adjustive. Ekaterina is depictive. Ricardo is nonfat. Ricardo is rash. Ricardo is quixotic. Ricardo is adjustive. Ricardo is depictive. If something is quixotic and rash then it is nebulose. Young, conniving things are adjustive. If something is quixotic and conniving then it is rash. Luci is rash.", "logic": "\nNonfat(luci)\nQuixotic(luci)\nConniving(luci)\nAdjustive(luci)\nDepictive(luci)\nNonfat(ekaterina)\nNebulose(ekaterina)\nRash(ekaterina)\nConniving(ekaterina)\nAdjustive(ekaterina)\nDepictive(ekaterina)\nNonfat(ricardo)\nRash(ricardo)\nQuixotic(ricardo)\nAdjustive(ricardo)\nDepictive(ricardo)\nforall x (Quixotic(x) and Rash(x) -> Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Depictive(x) and Conniving(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nforall x (Quixotic(x) and Conniving(x) -> Rash(x))\n\nRash(luci)\n\nQuixotic(luci) and Conniving(luci) and forall x (Quixotic(x) and Conniving(x) -> Rash(x)) -> therefore Rash(luci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Oprah is venturous. Oprah is unreached. Oprah is churchly. Oprah is fawning. Oprah is spinnable. Griselda is venturous. Griselda is three. Griselda is estonian. Griselda is churchly. Griselda is fawning. Griselda is spinnable. Sidnee is venturous. Sidnee is estonian. Sidnee is unreached. Sidnee is fawning. Sidnee is spinnable. If something is unreached and estonian then it is three. Young, churchly things are fawning. If something is unreached and churchly then it is estonian. Sidnee is not three.", "logic": "\nVenturous(oprah)\nUnreached(oprah)\nChurchly(oprah)\nFawning(oprah)\nSpinnable(oprah)\nVenturous(griselda)\nThree(griselda)\nEstonian(griselda)\nChurchly(griselda)\nFawning(griselda)\nSpinnable(griselda)\nVenturous(sidnee)\nEstonian(sidnee)\nUnreached(sidnee)\nFawning(sidnee)\nSpinnable(sidnee)\nforall x (Unreached(x) and Estonian(x) -> Three(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) and Churchly(x) -> Fawning(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and Churchly(x) -> Estonian(x))\n\nnot Three(sidnee)\n\nUnreached(sidnee) and Estonian(sidnee) and forall x (Unreached(x) and Estonian(x) -> Three(x)) -> therefore Three(sidnee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Emelita is cubistic. Emelita is climactic. Emelita is absorbing. Emelita is regional. Emelita is edental. Sarine is cubistic. Sarine is mansard. Sarine is dirigible. Sarine is absorbing. Sarine is regional. Sarine is edental. Hestia is cubistic. Hestia is dirigible. Hestia is climactic. Hestia is regional. Hestia is edental. If something is climactic and dirigible then it is mansard. Young, absorbing things are regional. If something is climactic and absorbing then it is dirigible. Emelita is mansard.", "logic": "\nCubistic(emelita)\nClimactic(emelita)\nAbsorbing(emelita)\nRegional(emelita)\nEdental(emelita)\nCubistic(sarine)\nMansard(sarine)\nDirigible(sarine)\nAbsorbing(sarine)\nRegional(sarine)\nEdental(sarine)\nCubistic(hestia)\nDirigible(hestia)\nClimactic(hestia)\nRegional(hestia)\nEdental(hestia)\nforall x (Climactic(x) and Dirigible(x) -> Mansard(x))\nforall x (Edental(x) and Absorbing(x) -> Regional(x))\nforall x (Climactic(x) and Absorbing(x) -> Dirigible(x))\n\nMansard(emelita)\n\nClimactic(emelita) and Absorbing(emelita) and forall x (Climactic(x) and Absorbing(x) -> Dirigible(x)) -> therefore Dirigible(emelita) Climactic(emelita) and Dirigible(emelita) and forall x (Climactic(x) and Dirigible(x) -> Mansard(x)) -> therefore Mansard(emelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Alina is forceless. Alina is tactical. Alina is crinkly. Alina is cheesy. Alina is unsaid. Abagael is forceless. Abagael is overall. Abagael is talented. Abagael is crinkly. Abagael is cheesy. Abagael is unsaid. Ernesto is forceless. Ernesto is talented. Ernesto is tactical. Ernesto is cheesy. Ernesto is unsaid. If something is tactical and talented then it is overall. Young, crinkly things are cheesy. If something is tactical and crinkly then it is talented. Alina is not overall.", "logic": "\nForceless(alina)\nTactical(alina)\nCrinkly(alina)\nCheesy(alina)\nUnsaid(alina)\nForceless(abagael)\nOverall(abagael)\nTalented(abagael)\nCrinkly(abagael)\nCheesy(abagael)\nUnsaid(abagael)\nForceless(ernesto)\nTalented(ernesto)\nTactical(ernesto)\nCheesy(ernesto)\nUnsaid(ernesto)\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Talented(x) -> Overall(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) and Crinkly(x) -> Cheesy(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Crinkly(x) -> Talented(x))\n\nnot Overall(alina)\n\nTactical(alina) and Crinkly(alina) and forall x (Tactical(x) and Crinkly(x) -> Talented(x)) -> therefore Talented(alina) Tactical(alina) and Talented(alina) and forall x (Tactical(x) and Talented(x) -> Overall(x)) -> therefore Overall(alina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Prissie is nonuple. Prissie is glace. Prissie is ungoverned. Prissie is funerary. Prissie is unordered. Rosa is nonuple. Rosa is infectious. Rosa is hugoesque. Rosa is ungoverned. Rosa is funerary. Rosa is unordered. Vanda is nonuple. Vanda is hugoesque. Vanda is glace. Vanda is funerary. Vanda is unordered. If something is glace and hugoesque then it is infectious. Young, ungoverned things are funerary. If something is glace and ungoverned then it is hugoesque. Rosa is not glace.", "logic": "\nNonuple(prissie)\nGlace(prissie)\nUngoverned(prissie)\nFunerary(prissie)\nUnordered(prissie)\nNonuple(rosa)\nInfectious(rosa)\nHugoesque(rosa)\nUngoverned(rosa)\nFunerary(rosa)\nUnordered(rosa)\nNonuple(vanda)\nHugoesque(vanda)\nGlace(vanda)\nFunerary(vanda)\nUnordered(vanda)\nforall x (Glace(x) and Hugoesque(x) -> Infectious(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) and Ungoverned(x) -> Funerary(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) and Ungoverned(x) -> Hugoesque(x))\n\nnot Glace(rosa)\n\nnot Glace(rosa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Mildrid is portrayed. Mildrid is braless. Mildrid is mellow. Mildrid is virginal. Mildrid is wavelike. Butch is portrayed. Butch is philatelic. Butch is callow. Butch is mellow. Butch is virginal. Butch is wavelike. Josy is portrayed. Josy is callow. Josy is braless. Josy is virginal. Josy is wavelike. If something is braless and callow then it is philatelic. Young, mellow things are virginal. If something is braless and mellow then it is callow. Josy is mellow.", "logic": "\nPortrayed(mildrid)\nBraless(mildrid)\nMellow(mildrid)\nVirginal(mildrid)\nWavelike(mildrid)\nPortrayed(butch)\nPhilatelic(butch)\nCallow(butch)\nMellow(butch)\nVirginal(butch)\nWavelike(butch)\nPortrayed(josy)\nCallow(josy)\nBraless(josy)\nVirginal(josy)\nWavelike(josy)\nforall x (Braless(x) and Callow(x) -> Philatelic(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and Mellow(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Braless(x) and Mellow(x) -> Callow(x))\n\nMellow(josy)\n\nMellow(josy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Myrle is uniparous. Joyann is pointed. All semidark, lawful people are sapid. All pointed people are semidark. Young people are sapid. Big, sapid people are hexed. All sapid, select people are hexed. All lawful people are sapid. If Myrle is pointed then Myrle is hexed. All pointed people are sapid. Myrle is uniparous.", "logic": "\nUniparous(myrle)\nPointed(joyann)\nforall x (Semidark(x) and Lawful(x) -> Sapid(x))\nforall x (Pointed(x) -> Semidark(x))\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> Sapid(x))\nforall x (Semidark(x) and Sapid(x) -> Hexed(x))\nforall x (Sapid(x) and Select(x) -> Hexed(x))\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> Sapid(x))\nPointed(myrle) -> Hexed(myrle)\nforall x (Pointed(x) -> Sapid(x))\n\nUniparous(myrle)\n\ntherefore Uniparous(myrle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Horacio is mannerly. Faydra is converted. All inviting, galled people are unconsumed. All converted people are inviting. Young people are unconsumed. Big, unconsumed people are aleutian. All unconsumed, vexatious people are aleutian. All galled people are unconsumed. If Horacio is converted then Horacio is aleutian. All converted people are unconsumed. Horacio is not mannerly.", "logic": "\nMannerly(horacio)\nConverted(faydra)\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Galled(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nforall x (Converted(x) -> Inviting(x))\nforall x (Galled(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Unconsumed(x) -> Aleutian(x))\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Aleutian(x))\nforall x (Galled(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nConverted(horacio) -> Aleutian(horacio)\nforall x (Converted(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\n\nnot Mannerly(horacio)\n\ntherefore Mannerly(horacio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Wiatt is puranic. Lia is seven. All parturient, consoling people are chaldaean. All seven people are parturient. Young people are chaldaean. Big, chaldaean people are homegrown. All chaldaean, achromatic people are homegrown. All consoling people are chaldaean. If Wiatt is seven then Wiatt is homegrown. All seven people are chaldaean. Lia is parturient.", "logic": "\nPuranic(wiatt)\nSeven(lia)\nforall x (Parturient(x) and Consoling(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nforall x (Seven(x) -> Parturient(x))\nforall x (Consoling(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) and Chaldaean(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Consoling(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nSeven(wiatt) -> Homegrown(wiatt)\nforall x (Seven(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\n\nParturient(lia)\n\nSeven(lia) and forall x (Seven(x) -> Parturient(x)) -> therefore Parturient(lia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Bernard is unhampered. Perle is revertible. All possible, shona people are synchronic. All revertible people are possible. Young people are synchronic. Big, synchronic people are returnable. All synchronic, torrential people are returnable. All shona people are synchronic. If Bernard is revertible then Bernard is returnable. All revertible people are synchronic. Perle is not synchronic.", "logic": "\nUnhampered(bernard)\nRevertible(perle)\nforall x (Possible(x) and Shona(x) -> Synchronic(x))\nforall x (Revertible(x) -> Possible(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Synchronic(x))\nforall x (Possible(x) and Synchronic(x) -> Returnable(x))\nforall x (Synchronic(x) and Torrential(x) -> Returnable(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Synchronic(x))\nRevertible(bernard) -> Returnable(bernard)\nforall x (Revertible(x) -> Synchronic(x))\n\nnot Synchronic(perle)\n\nRevertible(perle) and forall x (Revertible(x) -> Synchronic(x)) -> therefore Synchronic(perle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Mayor is undulate. Madalyn is prostate. All draughty, carbonyl people are resounding. All prostate people are draughty. Young people are resounding. Big, resounding people are disturbing. All resounding, cackly people are disturbing. All carbonyl people are resounding. If Mayor is prostate then Mayor is disturbing. All prostate people are resounding. Madalyn is disturbing.", "logic": "\nUndulate(mayor)\nProstate(madalyn)\nforall x (Draughty(x) and Carbonyl(x) -> Resounding(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> Draughty(x))\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) -> Resounding(x))\nforall x (Draughty(x) and Resounding(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Resounding(x) and Cackly(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) -> Resounding(x))\nProstate(mayor) -> Disturbing(mayor)\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> Resounding(x))\n\nDisturbing(madalyn)\n\nProstate(madalyn) and forall x (Prostate(x) -> Draughty(x)) -> therefore Draughty(madalyn) Prostate(madalyn) and forall x (Prostate(x) -> Resounding(x)) -> therefore Resounding(madalyn) Draughty(madalyn) and Resounding(madalyn) and forall x (Draughty(x) and Resounding(x) -> Disturbing(x)) -> therefore Disturbing(madalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Annamarie is necklike. Leo is windy. All cushy, baltic people are common. All windy people are cushy. Young people are common. Big, common people are evergreen. All common, gangrenous people are evergreen. All baltic people are common. If Annamarie is windy then Annamarie is evergreen. All windy people are common. Leo is not evergreen.", "logic": "\nNecklike(annamarie)\nWindy(leo)\nforall x (Cushy(x) and Baltic(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Windy(x) -> Cushy(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Cushy(x) and Common(x) -> Evergreen(x))\nforall x (Common(x) and Gangrenous(x) -> Evergreen(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) -> Common(x))\nWindy(annamarie) -> Evergreen(annamarie)\nforall x (Windy(x) -> Common(x))\n\nnot Evergreen(leo)\n\nWindy(leo) and forall x (Windy(x) -> Cushy(x)) -> therefore Cushy(leo) Windy(leo) and forall x (Windy(x) -> Common(x)) -> therefore Common(leo) Cushy(leo) and Common(leo) and forall x (Cushy(x) and Common(x) -> Evergreen(x)) -> therefore Evergreen(leo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Babette is unimpaired. Breanne is patented. All usable, unceasing people are fictitious. All patented people are usable. Young people are fictitious. Big, fictitious people are traveled. All fictitious, abroad people are traveled. All unceasing people are fictitious. If Babette is patented then Babette is traveled. All patented people are fictitious. Babette is not fictitious.", "logic": "\nUnimpaired(babette)\nPatented(breanne)\nforall x (Usable(x) and Unceasing(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Usable(x))\nforall x (Unceasing(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nforall x (Usable(x) and Fictitious(x) -> Traveled(x))\nforall x (Fictitious(x) and Abroad(x) -> Traveled(x))\nforall x (Unceasing(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nPatented(babette) -> Traveled(babette)\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Fictitious(x))\n\nnot Fictitious(babette)\n\nforall x (Usable(x) and Unceasing(x) -> Fictitious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Leonie is acrid. Moishe is fossilized. All lacustrine, shorn people are crinkly. All fossilized people are lacustrine. Young people are crinkly. Big, crinkly people are humanist. All crinkly, bosomed people are humanist. All shorn people are crinkly. If Leonie is fossilized then Leonie is humanist. All fossilized people are crinkly. Leonie is lacustrine.", "logic": "\nAcrid(leonie)\nFossilized(moishe)\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) and Shorn(x) -> Crinkly(x))\nforall x (Fossilized(x) -> Lacustrine(x))\nforall x (Shorn(x) -> Crinkly(x))\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) and Crinkly(x) -> Humanist(x))\nforall x (Crinkly(x) and Bosomed(x) -> Humanist(x))\nforall x (Shorn(x) -> Crinkly(x))\nFossilized(leonie) -> Humanist(leonie)\nforall x (Fossilized(x) -> Crinkly(x))\n\nLacustrine(leonie)\n\nforall x (Fossilized(x) -> Lacustrine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Berkeley is heathlike. Margaret is slummy. All starchlike, delicate people are icebound. All slummy people are starchlike. Young people are icebound. Big, icebound people are telescopic. All icebound, toothsome people are telescopic. All delicate people are icebound. If Berkeley is slummy then Berkeley is telescopic. All slummy people are icebound. Berkeley is not telescopic.", "logic": "\nHeathlike(berkeley)\nSlummy(margaret)\nforall x (Starchlike(x) and Delicate(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Slummy(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nforall x (Delicate(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Starchlike(x) and Icebound(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) and Toothsome(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nforall x (Delicate(x) -> Icebound(x))\nSlummy(berkeley) -> Telescopic(berkeley)\nforall x (Slummy(x) -> Icebound(x))\n\nnot Telescopic(berkeley)\n\nforall x (Starchlike(x) and Icebound(x) -> Telescopic(x)) <- forall x (Slummy(x) -> Starchlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Samuele is ctenoid. Rustie is debauched. All fascistic, epicurean people are curt. All debauched people are fascistic. Young people are curt. Big, curt people are eighteenth. All curt, hidrotic people are eighteenth. All epicurean people are curt. If Samuele is debauched then Samuele is eighteenth. All debauched people are curt. Samuele is epicurean.", "logic": "\nCtenoid(samuele)\nDebauched(rustie)\nforall x (Fascistic(x) and Epicurean(x) -> Curt(x))\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Fascistic(x))\nforall x (Epicurean(x) -> Curt(x))\nforall x (Fascistic(x) and Curt(x) -> Eighteenth(x))\nforall x (Curt(x) and Hidrotic(x) -> Eighteenth(x))\nforall x (Epicurean(x) -> Curt(x))\nDebauched(samuele) -> Eighteenth(samuele)\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Curt(x))\n\nEpicurean(samuele)\n\nEpicurean(samuele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Jonie is seljuk. Gunther is analyzable. All flagging, filmed people are evidenced. All analyzable people are flagging. Young people are evidenced. Big, evidenced people are subjacent. All evidenced, unknowable people are subjacent. All filmed people are evidenced. If Jonie is analyzable then Jonie is subjacent. All analyzable people are evidenced. Gunther is not filmed.", "logic": "\nSeljuk(jonie)\nAnalyzable(gunther)\nforall x (Flagging(x) and Filmed(x) -> Evidenced(x))\nforall x (Analyzable(x) -> Flagging(x))\nforall x (Filmed(x) -> Evidenced(x))\nforall x (Flagging(x) and Evidenced(x) -> Subjacent(x))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Subjacent(x))\nforall x (Filmed(x) -> Evidenced(x))\nAnalyzable(jonie) -> Subjacent(jonie)\nforall x (Analyzable(x) -> Evidenced(x))\n\nnot Filmed(gunther)\n\nnot Filmed(gunther) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "Win is humpbacked. Pammie is squat. All sham, appressed people are lumpy. All squat people are sham. Young people are lumpy. Big, lumpy people are compulsory. All lumpy, detectable people are compulsory. All appressed people are lumpy. If Win is squat then Win is compulsory. All squat people are lumpy. Pammie is detectable.", "logic": "\nHumpbacked(win)\nSquat(pammie)\nforall x (Sham(x) and Appressed(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Squat(x) -> Sham(x))\nforall x (Appressed(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Sham(x) and Lumpy(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Lumpy(x) and Detectable(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Appressed(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nSquat(win) -> Compulsory(win)\nforall x (Squat(x) -> Lumpy(x))\n\nDetectable(pammie)\n\nDetectable(pammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2218"} {"premises": "The elaina is unliveried. Round, rooted things are unliveried. If something is anoxemic and not abusive then it is rooted. If something is abusive then it is not rooted. Red things are rooted. If something is lustful and not abusive then it is not anoxemic. If the elaina is rooted then the elaina is anoxemic. The elaina is unliveried.", "logic": "\nUnliveried(elaina)\nforall x (Abusive(x) and Rooted(x) -> Unliveried(x))\nforall x (Anoxemic(x) and not Abusive(x) -> Rooted(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> not Rooted(x))\nforall x (Unliveried(x) -> Rooted(x))\nforall x (Lustful(x) and not Abusive(x) -> not Anoxemic(x))\nRooted(elaina) -> Anoxemic(elaina)\n\nUnliveried(elaina)\n\ntherefore Unliveried(elaina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The douglas is unexpended. Round, worsening things are unexpended. If something is uniate and not dowered then it is worsening. If something is dowered then it is not worsening. Red things are worsening. If something is knotted and not dowered then it is not uniate. If the douglas is worsening then the douglas is uniate. The douglas is not unexpended.", "logic": "\nUnexpended(douglas)\nforall x (Dowered(x) and Worsening(x) -> Unexpended(x))\nforall x (Uniate(x) and not Dowered(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> not Worsening(x))\nforall x (Unexpended(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Knotted(x) and not Dowered(x) -> not Uniate(x))\nWorsening(douglas) -> Uniate(douglas)\n\nnot Unexpended(douglas)\n\ntherefore Unexpended(douglas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The guthrey is rugged. Round, unflurried things are rugged. If something is thwarted and not monoecious then it is unflurried. If something is monoecious then it is not unflurried. Red things are unflurried. If something is forgivable and not monoecious then it is not thwarted. If the guthrey is unflurried then the guthrey is thwarted. The guthrey is unflurried.", "logic": "\nRugged(guthrey)\nforall x (Monoecious(x) and Unflurried(x) -> Rugged(x))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) and not Monoecious(x) -> Unflurried(x))\nforall x (Monoecious(x) -> not Unflurried(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) -> Unflurried(x))\nforall x (Forgivable(x) and not Monoecious(x) -> not Thwarted(x))\nUnflurried(guthrey) -> Thwarted(guthrey)\n\nUnflurried(guthrey)\n\nRugged(guthrey) and forall x (Rugged(x) -> Unflurried(x)) -> therefore Unflurried(guthrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The leonore is hassidic. Round, occipital things are hassidic. If something is loved and not pursuing then it is occipital. If something is pursuing then it is not occipital. Red things are occipital. If something is spiteful and not pursuing then it is not loved. If the leonore is occipital then the leonore is loved. The leonore is not occipital.", "logic": "\nHassidic(leonore)\nforall x (Pursuing(x) and Occipital(x) -> Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Loved(x) and not Pursuing(x) -> Occipital(x))\nforall x (Pursuing(x) -> not Occipital(x))\nforall x (Hassidic(x) -> Occipital(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) and not Pursuing(x) -> not Loved(x))\nOccipital(leonore) -> Loved(leonore)\n\nnot Occipital(leonore)\n\nHassidic(leonore) and forall x (Hassidic(x) -> Occipital(x)) -> therefore Occipital(leonore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The pavla is wavering. Round, sugary things are wavering. If something is gonadal and not human then it is sugary. If something is human then it is not sugary. Red things are sugary. If something is fragmented and not human then it is not gonadal. If the pavla is sugary then the pavla is gonadal. The pavla is gonadal.", "logic": "\nWavering(pavla)\nforall x (Human(x) and Sugary(x) -> Wavering(x))\nforall x (Gonadal(x) and not Human(x) -> Sugary(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> not Sugary(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Sugary(x))\nforall x (Fragmented(x) and not Human(x) -> not Gonadal(x))\nSugary(pavla) -> Gonadal(pavla)\n\nGonadal(pavla)\n\nWavering(pavla) and forall x (Wavering(x) -> Sugary(x)) -> therefore Sugary(pavla) Sugary(pavla) and Sugary(pavla) -> Gonadal(pavla) -> therefore Gonadal(pavla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The neysa is tomentous. Round, revokable things are tomentous. If something is appetent and not morganatic then it is revokable. If something is morganatic then it is not revokable. Red things are revokable. If something is depictive and not morganatic then it is not appetent. If the neysa is revokable then the neysa is appetent. The neysa is not appetent.", "logic": "\nTomentous(neysa)\nforall x (Morganatic(x) and Revokable(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Appetent(x) and not Morganatic(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) -> not Revokable(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Depictive(x) and not Morganatic(x) -> not Appetent(x))\nRevokable(neysa) -> Appetent(neysa)\n\nnot Appetent(neysa)\n\nTomentous(neysa) and forall x (Tomentous(x) -> Revokable(x)) -> therefore Revokable(neysa) Revokable(neysa) and Revokable(neysa) -> Appetent(neysa) -> therefore Appetent(neysa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The chelsie is chorionic. Round, valent things are chorionic. If something is isopteran and not competent then it is valent. If something is competent then it is not valent. Red things are valent. If something is loathly and not competent then it is not isopteran. If the chelsie is valent then the chelsie is isopteran. The chelsie does not visit the chelsie.", "logic": "\nChorionic(chelsie)\nforall x (Competent(x) and Valent(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Isopteran(x) and not Competent(x) -> Valent(x))\nforall x (Competent(x) -> not Valent(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Valent(x))\nforall x (Loathly(x) and not Competent(x) -> not Isopteran(x))\nValent(chelsie) -> Isopteran(chelsie)\n\nnot Visits(chelsie, chelsie)\n\nnot Visits(chelsie, chelsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The aleta is tapped. Round, edacious things are tapped. If something is onshore and not bolivian then it is edacious. If something is bolivian then it is not edacious. Red things are edacious. If something is flowered and not bolivian then it is not onshore. If the aleta is edacious then the aleta is onshore. The aleta is bolivian.", "logic": "\nTapped(aleta)\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Edacious(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Onshore(x) and not Bolivian(x) -> Edacious(x))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> not Edacious(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) -> Edacious(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) and not Bolivian(x) -> not Onshore(x))\nEdacious(aleta) -> Onshore(aleta)\n\nBolivian(aleta)\n\nBolivian(aleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The marielle is clxxx. Round, torturing things are clxxx. If something is occasional and not unmourned then it is torturing. If something is unmourned then it is not torturing. Red things are torturing. If something is sidearm and not unmourned then it is not occasional. If the marielle is torturing then the marielle is occasional. The marielle is not sidearm.", "logic": "\nClxxx(marielle)\nforall x (Unmourned(x) and Torturing(x) -> Clxxx(x))\nforall x (Occasional(x) and not Unmourned(x) -> Torturing(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) -> not Torturing(x))\nforall x (Clxxx(x) -> Torturing(x))\nforall x (Sidearm(x) and not Unmourned(x) -> not Occasional(x))\nTorturing(marielle) -> Occasional(marielle)\n\nnot Sidearm(marielle)\n\nnot Sidearm(marielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The sigrid is befitting. Round, unlamented things are befitting. If something is unpierced and not jain then it is unlamented. If something is jain then it is not unlamented. Red things are unlamented. If something is lighted and not jain then it is not unpierced. If the sigrid is unlamented then the sigrid is unpierced. The sigrid eats the sigrid.", "logic": "\nBefitting(sigrid)\nforall x (Jain(x) and Unlamented(x) -> Befitting(x))\nforall x (Unpierced(x) and not Jain(x) -> Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Jain(x) -> not Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Befitting(x) -> Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Lighted(x) and not Jain(x) -> not Unpierced(x))\nUnlamented(sigrid) -> Unpierced(sigrid)\n\nEats(sigrid, sigrid)\n\nEats(sigrid, sigrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-64"} {"premises": "The donni disgrace the marta. The donni is untroubled. The barney is not senior. The barney does not need the donni. The marta disgrace the barney. The marta is senior. The marta is avertible. The marta chamber the donni. The marta chamber the barney. The marta does not see the barney. If something disgrace the donni then it is fruticose. If something is untroubled then it phase the barney. If something is embonpoint and it does not need the donni then it chamber the marta. If something phase the barney then the barney disgrace the marta. If something chamber the donni and the donni does not see the marta then the donni chamber the marta. If the barney phase the donni then the donni chamber the marta. If something chamber the donni then the donni is untroubled. If something disgrace the donni then it does not need the barney. The marta is avertible.", "logic": "\nDisgrace(donni, marta)\nUntroubled(donni)\nnot Senior(barney)\nnot Chamber(barney, donni)\nDisgrace(marta, barney)\nSenior(marta)\nAvertible(marta)\nChamber(marta, donni)\nChamber(marta, barney)\nnot Phase(marta, barney)\nforall x (Disgrace(x, donni) -> Fruticose(x))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Phase(x, barney))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) and not Chamber(x, donni) -> Chamber(x, marta))\nforall x (Phase(x, barney) -> Disgrace(barney, marta))\nforall x (Chamber(x, donni) and not Phase(donni, marta) -> Chamber(donni, marta))\nPhase(barney, donni) -> Chamber(donni, marta)\nforall x (Chamber(x, donni) -> Untroubled(donni))\nforall x (Disgrace(x, donni) -> not Chamber(x, barney))\n\nAvertible(marta)\n\ntherefore Avertible(marta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The julianna cachinnate the maxim. The julianna is graceless. The jessalin is not uncoupled. The jessalin does not need the julianna. The maxim cachinnate the jessalin. The maxim is uncoupled. The maxim is catalan. The maxim debunk the julianna. The maxim debunk the jessalin. The maxim does not see the jessalin. If something cachinnate the julianna then it is westside. If something is graceless then it swear the jessalin. If something is disposable and it does not need the julianna then it debunk the maxim. If something swear the jessalin then the jessalin cachinnate the maxim. If something debunk the julianna and the julianna does not see the maxim then the julianna debunk the maxim. If the jessalin swear the julianna then the julianna debunk the maxim. If something debunk the julianna then the julianna is graceless. If something cachinnate the julianna then it does not need the jessalin. The maxim is not catalan.", "logic": "\nCachinnate(julianna, maxim)\nGraceless(julianna)\nnot Uncoupled(jessalin)\nnot Debunk(jessalin, julianna)\nCachinnate(maxim, jessalin)\nUncoupled(maxim)\nCatalan(maxim)\nDebunk(maxim, julianna)\nDebunk(maxim, jessalin)\nnot Swear(maxim, jessalin)\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, julianna) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Graceless(x) -> Swear(x, jessalin))\nforall x (Disposable(x) and not Debunk(x, julianna) -> Debunk(x, maxim))\nforall x (Swear(x, jessalin) -> Cachinnate(jessalin, maxim))\nforall x (Debunk(x, julianna) and not Swear(julianna, maxim) -> Debunk(julianna, maxim))\nSwear(jessalin, julianna) -> Debunk(julianna, maxim)\nforall x (Debunk(x, julianna) -> Graceless(julianna))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, julianna) -> not Debunk(x, jessalin))\n\nnot Catalan(maxim)\n\ntherefore Catalan(maxim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The nicole scar the janetta. The nicole is statutory. The harlene is not tested. The harlene does not need the nicole. The janetta scar the harlene. The janetta is tested. The janetta is spirituous. The janetta replace the nicole. The janetta replace the harlene. The janetta does not see the harlene. If something scar the nicole then it is affixed. If something is statutory then it benumb the harlene. If something is vesicatory and it does not need the nicole then it replace the janetta. If something benumb the harlene then the harlene scar the janetta. If something replace the nicole and the nicole does not see the janetta then the nicole replace the janetta. If the harlene benumb the nicole then the nicole replace the janetta. If something replace the nicole then the nicole is statutory. If something scar the nicole then it does not need the harlene. The nicole benumb the harlene.", "logic": "\nScar(nicole, janetta)\nStatutory(nicole)\nnot Tested(harlene)\nnot Replace(harlene, nicole)\nScar(janetta, harlene)\nTested(janetta)\nSpirituous(janetta)\nReplace(janetta, nicole)\nReplace(janetta, harlene)\nnot Benumb(janetta, harlene)\nforall x (Scar(x, nicole) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Statutory(x) -> Benumb(x, harlene))\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) and not Replace(x, nicole) -> Replace(x, janetta))\nforall x (Benumb(x, harlene) -> Scar(harlene, janetta))\nforall x (Replace(x, nicole) and not Benumb(nicole, janetta) -> Replace(nicole, janetta))\nBenumb(harlene, nicole) -> Replace(nicole, janetta)\nforall x (Replace(x, nicole) -> Statutory(nicole))\nforall x (Scar(x, nicole) -> not Replace(x, harlene))\n\nBenumb(nicole, harlene)\n\nStatutory(nicole) and forall x (Statutory(x) -> Benumb(x, harlene)) -> therefore Benumb(nicole, harlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The fidelia cool the stephana. The fidelia is hortatory. The zita is not reverend. The zita does not need the fidelia. The stephana cool the zita. The stephana is reverend. The stephana is ungracious. The stephana release the fidelia. The stephana release the zita. The stephana does not see the zita. If something cool the fidelia then it is dimorphic. If something is hortatory then it slenderize the zita. If something is cloggy and it does not need the fidelia then it release the stephana. If something slenderize the zita then the zita cool the stephana. If something release the fidelia and the fidelia does not see the stephana then the fidelia release the stephana. If the zita slenderize the fidelia then the fidelia release the stephana. If something release the fidelia then the fidelia is hortatory. If something cool the fidelia then it does not need the zita. The fidelia does not see the zita.", "logic": "\nCool(fidelia, stephana)\nHortatory(fidelia)\nnot Reverend(zita)\nnot Release(zita, fidelia)\nCool(stephana, zita)\nReverend(stephana)\nUngracious(stephana)\nRelease(stephana, fidelia)\nRelease(stephana, zita)\nnot Slenderize(stephana, zita)\nforall x (Cool(x, fidelia) -> Dimorphic(x))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) -> Slenderize(x, zita))\nforall x (Cloggy(x) and not Release(x, fidelia) -> Release(x, stephana))\nforall x (Slenderize(x, zita) -> Cool(zita, stephana))\nforall x (Release(x, fidelia) and not Slenderize(fidelia, stephana) -> Release(fidelia, stephana))\nSlenderize(zita, fidelia) -> Release(fidelia, stephana)\nforall x (Release(x, fidelia) -> Hortatory(fidelia))\nforall x (Cool(x, fidelia) -> not Release(x, zita))\n\nnot Slenderize(fidelia, zita)\n\nHortatory(fidelia) and forall x (Hortatory(x) -> Slenderize(x, zita)) -> therefore Slenderize(fidelia, zita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The rozamond encircle the anthe. The rozamond is wingless. The arleen is not bilobated. The arleen does not need the rozamond. The anthe encircle the arleen. The anthe is bilobated. The anthe is cissy. The anthe outlaw the rozamond. The anthe outlaw the arleen. The anthe does not see the arleen. If something encircle the rozamond then it is variolous. If something is wingless then it cloud the arleen. If something is redeemed and it does not need the rozamond then it outlaw the anthe. If something cloud the arleen then the arleen encircle the anthe. If something outlaw the rozamond and the rozamond does not see the anthe then the rozamond outlaw the anthe. If the arleen cloud the rozamond then the rozamond outlaw the anthe. If something outlaw the rozamond then the rozamond is wingless. If something encircle the rozamond then it does not need the arleen. The arleen encircle the anthe.", "logic": "\nEncircle(rozamond, anthe)\nWingless(rozamond)\nnot Bilobated(arleen)\nnot Outlaw(arleen, rozamond)\nEncircle(anthe, arleen)\nBilobated(anthe)\nCissy(anthe)\nOutlaw(anthe, rozamond)\nOutlaw(anthe, arleen)\nnot Cloud(anthe, arleen)\nforall x (Encircle(x, rozamond) -> Variolous(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Cloud(x, arleen))\nforall x (Redeemed(x) and not Outlaw(x, rozamond) -> Outlaw(x, anthe))\nforall x (Cloud(x, arleen) -> Encircle(arleen, anthe))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, rozamond) and not Cloud(rozamond, anthe) -> Outlaw(rozamond, anthe))\nCloud(arleen, rozamond) -> Outlaw(rozamond, anthe)\nforall x (Outlaw(x, rozamond) -> Wingless(rozamond))\nforall x (Encircle(x, rozamond) -> not Outlaw(x, arleen))\n\nEncircle(arleen, anthe)\n\nWingless(rozamond) and forall x (Wingless(x) -> Cloud(x, arleen)) -> therefore Cloud(rozamond, arleen) Cloud(rozamond, arleen) and forall x (Cloud(x, arleen) -> Encircle(arleen, anthe)) -> therefore Encircle(arleen, anthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The amalee satirise the katy. The amalee is hybrid. The fergus is not algerian. The fergus does not need the amalee. The katy satirise the fergus. The katy is algerian. The katy is birken. The katy relent the amalee. The katy relent the fergus. The katy does not see the fergus. If something satirise the amalee then it is goofy. If something is hybrid then it cuss the fergus. If something is gelatinous and it does not need the amalee then it relent the katy. If something cuss the fergus then the fergus satirise the katy. If something relent the amalee and the amalee does not see the katy then the amalee relent the katy. If the fergus cuss the amalee then the amalee relent the katy. If something relent the amalee then the amalee is hybrid. If something satirise the amalee then it does not need the fergus. The fergus does not chase the katy.", "logic": "\nSatirise(amalee, katy)\nHybrid(amalee)\nnot Algerian(fergus)\nnot Relent(fergus, amalee)\nSatirise(katy, fergus)\nAlgerian(katy)\nBirken(katy)\nRelent(katy, amalee)\nRelent(katy, fergus)\nnot Cuss(katy, fergus)\nforall x (Satirise(x, amalee) -> Goofy(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) -> Cuss(x, fergus))\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) and not Relent(x, amalee) -> Relent(x, katy))\nforall x (Cuss(x, fergus) -> Satirise(fergus, katy))\nforall x (Relent(x, amalee) and not Cuss(amalee, katy) -> Relent(amalee, katy))\nCuss(fergus, amalee) -> Relent(amalee, katy)\nforall x (Relent(x, amalee) -> Hybrid(amalee))\nforall x (Satirise(x, amalee) -> not Relent(x, fergus))\n\nnot Satirise(fergus, katy)\n\nHybrid(amalee) and forall x (Hybrid(x) -> Cuss(x, fergus)) -> therefore Cuss(amalee, fergus) Cuss(amalee, fergus) and forall x (Cuss(x, fergus) -> Satirise(fergus, katy)) -> therefore Satirise(fergus, katy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The hewett ejaculate the shel. The hewett is bituminoid. The dorit is not less. The dorit does not need the hewett. The shel ejaculate the dorit. The shel is less. The shel is mesmerized. The shel rain the hewett. The shel rain the dorit. The shel does not see the dorit. If something ejaculate the hewett then it is nonviolent. If something is bituminoid then it earn the dorit. If something is composed and it does not need the hewett then it rain the shel. If something earn the dorit then the dorit ejaculate the shel. If something rain the hewett and the hewett does not see the shel then the hewett rain the shel. If the dorit earn the hewett then the hewett rain the shel. If something rain the hewett then the hewett is bituminoid. If something ejaculate the hewett then it does not need the dorit. The dorit does not need the shel.", "logic": "\nEjaculate(hewett, shel)\nBituminoid(hewett)\nnot Less(dorit)\nnot Rain(dorit, hewett)\nEjaculate(shel, dorit)\nLess(shel)\nMesmerized(shel)\nRain(shel, hewett)\nRain(shel, dorit)\nnot Earn(shel, dorit)\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, hewett) -> Nonviolent(x))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> Earn(x, dorit))\nforall x (Composed(x) and not Rain(x, hewett) -> Rain(x, shel))\nforall x (Earn(x, dorit) -> Ejaculate(dorit, shel))\nforall x (Rain(x, hewett) and not Earn(hewett, shel) -> Rain(hewett, shel))\nEarn(dorit, hewett) -> Rain(hewett, shel)\nforall x (Rain(x, hewett) -> Bituminoid(hewett))\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, hewett) -> not Rain(x, dorit))\n\nnot Rain(dorit, shel)\n\nforall x (Composed(x) and not Rain(x, hewett) -> Rain(x, shel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The rudy capitalise the aline. The rudy is biloculate. The irita is not american. The irita does not need the rudy. The aline capitalise the irita. The aline is american. The aline is diffusive. The aline lacerate the rudy. The aline lacerate the irita. The aline does not see the irita. If something capitalise the rudy then it is shamefaced. If something is biloculate then it mistreat the irita. If something is clean and it does not need the rudy then it lacerate the aline. If something mistreat the irita then the irita capitalise the aline. If something lacerate the rudy and the rudy does not see the aline then the rudy lacerate the aline. If the irita mistreat the rudy then the rudy lacerate the aline. If something lacerate the rudy then the rudy is biloculate. If something capitalise the rudy then it does not need the irita. The irita mistreat the irita.", "logic": "\nCapitalise(rudy, aline)\nBiloculate(rudy)\nnot American(irita)\nnot Lacerate(irita, rudy)\nCapitalise(aline, irita)\nAmerican(aline)\nDiffusive(aline)\nLacerate(aline, rudy)\nLacerate(aline, irita)\nnot Mistreat(aline, irita)\nforall x (Capitalise(x, rudy) -> Shamefaced(x))\nforall x (Biloculate(x) -> Mistreat(x, irita))\nforall x (Clean(x) and not Lacerate(x, rudy) -> Lacerate(x, aline))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, irita) -> Capitalise(irita, aline))\nforall x (Lacerate(x, rudy) and not Mistreat(rudy, aline) -> Lacerate(rudy, aline))\nMistreat(irita, rudy) -> Lacerate(rudy, aline)\nforall x (Lacerate(x, rudy) -> Biloculate(rudy))\nforall x (Capitalise(x, rudy) -> not Lacerate(x, irita))\n\nMistreat(irita, irita)\n\nforall x (Biloculate(x) -> Mistreat(x, irita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The viva stay the fionna. The viva is empowered. The chad is not seamless. The chad does not need the viva. The fionna stay the chad. The fionna is seamless. The fionna is soundproof. The fionna enervate the viva. The fionna enervate the chad. The fionna does not see the chad. If something stay the viva then it is amebous. If something is empowered then it repurchase the chad. If something is needy and it does not need the viva then it enervate the fionna. If something repurchase the chad then the chad stay the fionna. If something enervate the viva and the viva does not see the fionna then the viva enervate the fionna. If the chad repurchase the viva then the viva enervate the fionna. If something enervate the viva then the viva is empowered. If something stay the viva then it does not need the chad. The fionna is not amebous.", "logic": "\nStay(viva, fionna)\nEmpowered(viva)\nnot Seamless(chad)\nnot Enervate(chad, viva)\nStay(fionna, chad)\nSeamless(fionna)\nSoundproof(fionna)\nEnervate(fionna, viva)\nEnervate(fionna, chad)\nnot Repurchase(fionna, chad)\nforall x (Stay(x, viva) -> Amebous(x))\nforall x (Empowered(x) -> Repurchase(x, chad))\nforall x (Needy(x) and not Enervate(x, viva) -> Enervate(x, fionna))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, chad) -> Stay(chad, fionna))\nforall x (Enervate(x, viva) and not Repurchase(viva, fionna) -> Enervate(viva, fionna))\nRepurchase(chad, viva) -> Enervate(viva, fionna)\nforall x (Enervate(x, viva) -> Empowered(viva))\nforall x (Stay(x, viva) -> not Enervate(x, chad))\n\nnot Amebous(fionna)\n\nforall x (Stay(x, viva) -> Amebous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The della thirst the raphael. The della is icebound. The jobie is not chylific. The jobie does not need the della. The raphael thirst the jobie. The raphael is chylific. The raphael is boolean. The raphael lustrate the della. The raphael lustrate the jobie. The raphael does not see the jobie. If something thirst the della then it is nonpolar. If something is icebound then it jiggle the jobie. If something is amphibian and it does not need the della then it lustrate the raphael. If something jiggle the jobie then the jobie thirst the raphael. If something lustrate the della and the della does not see the raphael then the della lustrate the raphael. If the jobie jiggle the della then the della lustrate the raphael. If something lustrate the della then the della is icebound. If something thirst the della then it does not need the jobie. The jobie is icebound.", "logic": "\nThirst(della, raphael)\nIcebound(della)\nnot Chylific(jobie)\nnot Lustrate(jobie, della)\nThirst(raphael, jobie)\nChylific(raphael)\nBoolean(raphael)\nLustrate(raphael, della)\nLustrate(raphael, jobie)\nnot Jiggle(raphael, jobie)\nforall x (Thirst(x, della) -> Nonpolar(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Jiggle(x, jobie))\nforall x (Amphibian(x) and not Lustrate(x, della) -> Lustrate(x, raphael))\nforall x (Jiggle(x, jobie) -> Thirst(jobie, raphael))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, della) and not Jiggle(della, raphael) -> Lustrate(della, raphael))\nJiggle(jobie, della) -> Lustrate(della, raphael)\nforall x (Lustrate(x, della) -> Icebound(della))\nforall x (Thirst(x, della) -> not Lustrate(x, jobie))\n\nIcebound(jobie)\n\nIcebound(jobie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The tremayne pervert the reinhard. The tremayne is classy. The marsha is not brunette. The marsha does not need the tremayne. The reinhard pervert the marsha. The reinhard is brunette. The reinhard is fortuitous. The reinhard sequence the tremayne. The reinhard sequence the marsha. The reinhard does not see the marsha. If something pervert the tremayne then it is accidental. If something is classy then it quarantine the marsha. If something is epizoan and it does not need the tremayne then it sequence the reinhard. If something quarantine the marsha then the marsha pervert the reinhard. If something sequence the tremayne and the tremayne does not see the reinhard then the tremayne sequence the reinhard. If the marsha quarantine the tremayne then the tremayne sequence the reinhard. If something sequence the tremayne then the tremayne is classy. If something pervert the tremayne then it does not need the marsha. The reinhard is not classy.", "logic": "\nPervert(tremayne, reinhard)\nClassy(tremayne)\nnot Brunette(marsha)\nnot Sequence(marsha, tremayne)\nPervert(reinhard, marsha)\nBrunette(reinhard)\nFortuitous(reinhard)\nSequence(reinhard, tremayne)\nSequence(reinhard, marsha)\nnot Quarantine(reinhard, marsha)\nforall x (Pervert(x, tremayne) -> Accidental(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) -> Quarantine(x, marsha))\nforall x (Epizoan(x) and not Sequence(x, tremayne) -> Sequence(x, reinhard))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, marsha) -> Pervert(marsha, reinhard))\nforall x (Sequence(x, tremayne) and not Quarantine(tremayne, reinhard) -> Sequence(tremayne, reinhard))\nQuarantine(marsha, tremayne) -> Sequence(tremayne, reinhard)\nforall x (Sequence(x, tremayne) -> Classy(tremayne))\nforall x (Pervert(x, tremayne) -> not Sequence(x, marsha))\n\nnot Classy(reinhard)\n\nnot Classy(reinhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "The berry disprove the opalina. The berry is travelled. The joab is not wakeful. The joab does not need the berry. The opalina disprove the joab. The opalina is wakeful. The opalina is adapted. The opalina factor the berry. The opalina factor the joab. The opalina does not see the joab. If something disprove the berry then it is chicken. If something is travelled then it talc the joab. If something is fell and it does not need the berry then it factor the opalina. If something talc the joab then the joab disprove the opalina. If something factor the berry and the berry does not see the opalina then the berry factor the opalina. If the joab talc the berry then the berry factor the opalina. If something factor the berry then the berry is travelled. If something disprove the berry then it does not need the joab. The opalina talc the opalina.", "logic": "\nDisprove(berry, opalina)\nTravelled(berry)\nnot Wakeful(joab)\nnot Factor(joab, berry)\nDisprove(opalina, joab)\nWakeful(opalina)\nAdapted(opalina)\nFactor(opalina, berry)\nFactor(opalina, joab)\nnot Talc(opalina, joab)\nforall x (Disprove(x, berry) -> Chicken(x))\nforall x (Travelled(x) -> Talc(x, joab))\nforall x (Fell(x) and not Factor(x, berry) -> Factor(x, opalina))\nforall x (Talc(x, joab) -> Disprove(joab, opalina))\nforall x (Factor(x, berry) and not Talc(berry, opalina) -> Factor(berry, opalina))\nTalc(joab, berry) -> Factor(berry, opalina)\nforall x (Factor(x, berry) -> Travelled(berry))\nforall x (Disprove(x, berry) -> not Factor(x, joab))\n\nTalc(opalina, opalina)\n\nTalc(opalina, opalina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Merci is not unvaried. Merci is aortic. Helga is not unvaried. Helga is orbicular. Helga is not aortic. Helga is sneaking. Helga is dynastic. Helga is reciprocal. Liz is unvaried. Liz is reciprocal. Big people are not orbicular. If Liz is orbicular then Liz is dynastic. If someone is unvaried then they are sneaking. If Liz is reciprocal then Liz is not cognisable. Big, cognisable people are dynastic. If someone is unvaried and not cognisable then they are dynastic. Helga is orbicular.", "logic": "\nnot Unvaried(merci)\nAortic(merci)\nnot Unvaried(helga)\nOrbicular(helga)\nnot Aortic(helga)\nSneaking(helga)\nDynastic(helga)\nReciprocal(helga)\nUnvaried(liz)\nReciprocal(liz)\nforall x (Unvaried(x) -> not Orbicular(x))\nOrbicular(liz) -> Dynastic(liz)\nforall x (Unvaried(x) -> Sneaking(x))\nReciprocal(liz) -> not Cognisable(liz)\nforall x (Unvaried(x) and Cognisable(x) -> Dynastic(x))\nforall x (Unvaried(x) and not Cognisable(x) -> Dynastic(x))\n\nOrbicular(helga)\n\ntherefore Orbicular(helga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Roanne is not particular. Roanne is fusiform. Tove is not particular. Tove is expectant. Tove is not fusiform. Tove is privileged. Tove is formic. Tove is coming. Caroline is particular. Caroline is coming. Big people are not expectant. If Caroline is expectant then Caroline is formic. If someone is particular then they are privileged. If Caroline is coming then Caroline is not animist. Big, animist people are formic. If someone is particular and not animist then they are formic. Caroline is not coming.", "logic": "\nnot Particular(roanne)\nFusiform(roanne)\nnot Particular(tove)\nExpectant(tove)\nnot Fusiform(tove)\nPrivileged(tove)\nFormic(tove)\nComing(tove)\nParticular(caroline)\nComing(caroline)\nforall x (Particular(x) -> not Expectant(x))\nExpectant(caroline) -> Formic(caroline)\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Privileged(x))\nComing(caroline) -> not Animist(caroline)\nforall x (Particular(x) and Animist(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Particular(x) and not Animist(x) -> Formic(x))\n\nnot Coming(caroline)\n\ntherefore Coming(caroline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Amelia is not paranormal. Amelia is aneurysmal. Cliff is not paranormal. Cliff is rejoicing. Cliff is not aneurysmal. Cliff is shrill. Cliff is satisfied. Cliff is semantic. Marshall is paranormal. Marshall is semantic. Big people are not rejoicing. If Marshall is rejoicing then Marshall is satisfied. If someone is paranormal then they are shrill. If Marshall is semantic then Marshall is not paid. Big, paid people are satisfied. If someone is paranormal and not paid then they are satisfied. Marshall is shrill.", "logic": "\nnot Paranormal(amelia)\nAneurysmal(amelia)\nnot Paranormal(cliff)\nRejoicing(cliff)\nnot Aneurysmal(cliff)\nShrill(cliff)\nSatisfied(cliff)\nSemantic(cliff)\nParanormal(marshall)\nSemantic(marshall)\nforall x (Paranormal(x) -> not Rejoicing(x))\nRejoicing(marshall) -> Satisfied(marshall)\nforall x (Paranormal(x) -> Shrill(x))\nSemantic(marshall) -> not Paid(marshall)\nforall x (Paranormal(x) and Paid(x) -> Satisfied(x))\nforall x (Paranormal(x) and not Paid(x) -> Satisfied(x))\n\nShrill(marshall)\n\nParanormal(marshall) and forall x (Paranormal(x) -> Shrill(x)) -> therefore Shrill(marshall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Jeanne is not synchronic. Jeanne is coccygeal. Fania is not synchronic. Fania is stupefied. Fania is not coccygeal. Fania is siliceous. Fania is tubular. Fania is true. Gerrie is synchronic. Gerrie is true. Big people are not stupefied. If Gerrie is stupefied then Gerrie is tubular. If someone is synchronic then they are siliceous. If Gerrie is true then Gerrie is not prohibited. Big, prohibited people are tubular. If someone is synchronic and not prohibited then they are tubular. Gerrie is not siliceous.", "logic": "\nnot Synchronic(jeanne)\nCoccygeal(jeanne)\nnot Synchronic(fania)\nStupefied(fania)\nnot Coccygeal(fania)\nSiliceous(fania)\nTubular(fania)\nTrue(fania)\nSynchronic(gerrie)\nTrue(gerrie)\nforall x (Synchronic(x) -> not Stupefied(x))\nStupefied(gerrie) -> Tubular(gerrie)\nforall x (Synchronic(x) -> Siliceous(x))\nTrue(gerrie) -> not Prohibited(gerrie)\nforall x (Synchronic(x) and Prohibited(x) -> Tubular(x))\nforall x (Synchronic(x) and not Prohibited(x) -> Tubular(x))\n\nnot Siliceous(gerrie)\n\nSynchronic(gerrie) and forall x (Synchronic(x) -> Siliceous(x)) -> therefore Siliceous(gerrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Ivan is not upscale. Ivan is teeny. Crawford is not upscale. Crawford is gabby. Crawford is not teeny. Crawford is farcical. Crawford is downstair. Crawford is lousy. Kristan is upscale. Kristan is lousy. Big people are not gabby. If Kristan is gabby then Kristan is downstair. If someone is upscale then they are farcical. If Kristan is lousy then Kristan is not unlikely. Big, unlikely people are downstair. If someone is upscale and not unlikely then they are downstair. Kristan is downstair.", "logic": "\nnot Upscale(ivan)\nTeeny(ivan)\nnot Upscale(crawford)\nGabby(crawford)\nnot Teeny(crawford)\nFarcical(crawford)\nDownstair(crawford)\nLousy(crawford)\nUpscale(kristan)\nLousy(kristan)\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> not Gabby(x))\nGabby(kristan) -> Downstair(kristan)\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Farcical(x))\nLousy(kristan) -> not Unlikely(kristan)\nforall x (Upscale(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Downstair(x))\nforall x (Upscale(x) and not Unlikely(x) -> Downstair(x))\n\nDownstair(kristan)\n\nLousy(kristan) and Lousy(kristan) -> not Unlikely(kristan) -> therefore not Unlikely(kristan) Upscale(kristan) and not Unlikely(kristan) and forall x (Upscale(x) and not Unlikely(x) -> Downstair(x)) -> therefore Downstair(kristan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Gipsy is not monotypic. Gipsy is stylized. Celestine is not monotypic. Celestine is monarchal. Celestine is not stylized. Celestine is snappy. Celestine is stinging. Celestine is nugatory. Benito is monotypic. Benito is nugatory. Big people are not monarchal. If Benito is monarchal then Benito is stinging. If someone is monotypic then they are snappy. If Benito is nugatory then Benito is not modulated. Big, modulated people are stinging. If someone is monotypic and not modulated then they are stinging. Benito is not stinging.", "logic": "\nnot Monotypic(gipsy)\nStylized(gipsy)\nnot Monotypic(celestine)\nMonarchal(celestine)\nnot Stylized(celestine)\nSnappy(celestine)\nStinging(celestine)\nNugatory(celestine)\nMonotypic(benito)\nNugatory(benito)\nforall x (Monotypic(x) -> not Monarchal(x))\nMonarchal(benito) -> Stinging(benito)\nforall x (Monotypic(x) -> Snappy(x))\nNugatory(benito) -> not Modulated(benito)\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and Modulated(x) -> Stinging(x))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and not Modulated(x) -> Stinging(x))\n\nnot Stinging(benito)\n\nNugatory(benito) and Nugatory(benito) -> not Modulated(benito) -> therefore not Modulated(benito) Monotypic(benito) and not Modulated(benito) and forall x (Monotypic(x) and not Modulated(x) -> Stinging(x)) -> therefore Stinging(benito)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Trudy is not visible. Trudy is ragged. Chere is not visible. Chere is edgy. Chere is not ragged. Chere is wispy. Chere is renegade. Chere is curst. Loren is visible. Loren is curst. Big people are not edgy. If Loren is edgy then Loren is renegade. If someone is visible then they are wispy. If Loren is curst then Loren is not blindfold. Big, blindfold people are renegade. If someone is visible and not blindfold then they are renegade. Trudy is not wispy.", "logic": "\nnot Visible(trudy)\nRagged(trudy)\nnot Visible(chere)\nEdgy(chere)\nnot Ragged(chere)\nWispy(chere)\nRenegade(chere)\nCurst(chere)\nVisible(loren)\nCurst(loren)\nforall x (Visible(x) -> not Edgy(x))\nEdgy(loren) -> Renegade(loren)\nforall x (Visible(x) -> Wispy(x))\nCurst(loren) -> not Blindfold(loren)\nforall x (Visible(x) and Blindfold(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Visible(x) and not Blindfold(x) -> Renegade(x))\n\nnot Wispy(trudy)\n\nforall x (Visible(x) -> Wispy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Dougie is not alopecic. Dougie is exploded. Sonnie is not alopecic. Sonnie is roiled. Sonnie is not exploded. Sonnie is decimal. Sonnie is biface. Sonnie is cerebral. Madeleine is alopecic. Madeleine is cerebral. Big people are not roiled. If Madeleine is roiled then Madeleine is biface. If someone is alopecic then they are decimal. If Madeleine is cerebral then Madeleine is not hooved. Big, hooved people are biface. If someone is alopecic and not hooved then they are biface. Dougie is biface.", "logic": "\nnot Alopecic(dougie)\nExploded(dougie)\nnot Alopecic(sonnie)\nRoiled(sonnie)\nnot Exploded(sonnie)\nDecimal(sonnie)\nBiface(sonnie)\nCerebral(sonnie)\nAlopecic(madeleine)\nCerebral(madeleine)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> not Roiled(x))\nRoiled(madeleine) -> Biface(madeleine)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> Decimal(x))\nCerebral(madeleine) -> not Hooved(madeleine)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and Hooved(x) -> Biface(x))\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and not Hooved(x) -> Biface(x))\n\nBiface(dougie)\n\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and Hooved(x) -> Biface(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Kelila is not referenced. Kelila is chic. Dulcy is not referenced. Dulcy is droopy. Dulcy is not chic. Dulcy is impaired. Dulcy is industrial. Dulcy is grungy. Kendra is referenced. Kendra is grungy. Big people are not droopy. If Kendra is droopy then Kendra is industrial. If someone is referenced then they are impaired. If Kendra is grungy then Kendra is not relative. Big, relative people are industrial. If someone is referenced and not relative then they are industrial. Kelila is not droopy.", "logic": "\nnot Referenced(kelila)\nChic(kelila)\nnot Referenced(dulcy)\nDroopy(dulcy)\nnot Chic(dulcy)\nImpaired(dulcy)\nIndustrial(dulcy)\nGrungy(dulcy)\nReferenced(kendra)\nGrungy(kendra)\nforall x (Referenced(x) -> not Droopy(x))\nDroopy(kendra) -> Industrial(kendra)\nforall x (Referenced(x) -> Impaired(x))\nGrungy(kendra) -> not Relative(kendra)\nforall x (Referenced(x) and Relative(x) -> Industrial(x))\nforall x (Referenced(x) and not Relative(x) -> Industrial(x))\n\nnot Droopy(kelila)\n\nnot Droopy(kelila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Breanne is not invertible. Breanne is resinated. Erhard is not invertible. Erhard is yellowish. Erhard is not resinated. Erhard is scarlet. Erhard is american. Erhard is bitumenoid. Barth is invertible. Barth is bitumenoid. Big people are not yellowish. If Barth is yellowish then Barth is american. If someone is invertible then they are scarlet. If Barth is bitumenoid then Barth is not showery. Big, showery people are american. If someone is invertible and not showery then they are american. Breanne is showery.", "logic": "\nnot Invertible(breanne)\nResinated(breanne)\nnot Invertible(erhard)\nYellowish(erhard)\nnot Resinated(erhard)\nScarlet(erhard)\nAmerican(erhard)\nBitumenoid(erhard)\nInvertible(barth)\nBitumenoid(barth)\nforall x (Invertible(x) -> not Yellowish(x))\nYellowish(barth) -> American(barth)\nforall x (Invertible(x) -> Scarlet(x))\nBitumenoid(barth) -> not Showery(barth)\nforall x (Invertible(x) and Showery(x) -> American(x))\nforall x (Invertible(x) and not Showery(x) -> American(x))\n\nShowery(breanne)\n\nShowery(breanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Freda is not perfumed. Freda is grand. Arlana is not perfumed. Arlana is saccadic. Arlana is not grand. Arlana is undeceived. Arlana is tinkling. Arlana is uncaused. Marlane is perfumed. Marlane is uncaused. Big people are not saccadic. If Marlane is saccadic then Marlane is tinkling. If someone is perfumed then they are undeceived. If Marlane is uncaused then Marlane is not filiform. Big, filiform people are tinkling. If someone is perfumed and not filiform then they are tinkling. Arlana is not filiform.", "logic": "\nnot Perfumed(freda)\nGrand(freda)\nnot Perfumed(arlana)\nSaccadic(arlana)\nnot Grand(arlana)\nUndeceived(arlana)\nTinkling(arlana)\nUncaused(arlana)\nPerfumed(marlane)\nUncaused(marlane)\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> not Saccadic(x))\nSaccadic(marlane) -> Tinkling(marlane)\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Undeceived(x))\nUncaused(marlane) -> not Filiform(marlane)\nforall x (Perfumed(x) and Filiform(x) -> Tinkling(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) and not Filiform(x) -> Tinkling(x))\n\nnot Filiform(arlana)\n\nnot Filiform(arlana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "Cybelle is not rambling. Cybelle is confounded. Gretal is not rambling. Gretal is concise. Gretal is not confounded. Gretal is indisposed. Gretal is reputable. Gretal is inexact. Barclay is rambling. Barclay is inexact. Big people are not concise. If Barclay is concise then Barclay is reputable. If someone is rambling then they are indisposed. If Barclay is inexact then Barclay is not unpopular. Big, unpopular people are reputable. If someone is rambling and not unpopular then they are reputable. Barclay is confounded.", "logic": "\nnot Rambling(cybelle)\nConfounded(cybelle)\nnot Rambling(gretal)\nConcise(gretal)\nnot Confounded(gretal)\nIndisposed(gretal)\nReputable(gretal)\nInexact(gretal)\nRambling(barclay)\nInexact(barclay)\nforall x (Rambling(x) -> not Concise(x))\nConcise(barclay) -> Reputable(barclay)\nforall x (Rambling(x) -> Indisposed(x))\nInexact(barclay) -> not Unpopular(barclay)\nforall x (Rambling(x) and Unpopular(x) -> Reputable(x))\nforall x (Rambling(x) and not Unpopular(x) -> Reputable(x))\n\nConfounded(barclay)\n\nConfounded(barclay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The thorn is sporty. The shaine posit the tiffi. The shaine codify the thorn. The shaine codify the bridget. The tiffi is momentous. The tiffi codify the thorn. The tiffi clop the thorn. The tiffi clop the shaine. The bridget posit the thorn. The bridget posit the shaine. The bridget is momentous. The bridget is tacky. If the bridget posit the shaine then the bridget is sporty. If someone posit the thorn then the thorn codify the shaine. If someone is momentous and they need the tiffi then the tiffi clop the thorn. If the thorn posit the shaine and the shaine posit the thorn then the thorn clop the tiffi. If someone codify the bridget and the bridget codify the thorn then they are northerly. Round people are tacky. If someone clop the shaine and they chase the bridget then the shaine clop the thorn. If someone is sporty and momentous then they chase the tiffi. The tiffi clop the thorn.", "logic": "\nSporty(thorn)\nPosit(shaine, tiffi)\nCodify(shaine, thorn)\nCodify(shaine, bridget)\nMomentous(tiffi)\nCodify(tiffi, thorn)\nClop(tiffi, thorn)\nClop(tiffi, shaine)\nPosit(bridget, thorn)\nPosit(bridget, shaine)\nMomentous(bridget)\nTacky(bridget)\nPosit(bridget, shaine) -> Sporty(bridget)\nforall x (Posit(x, thorn) -> Codify(thorn, shaine))\nforall x (Momentous(x) and Codify(x, tiffi) -> Clop(tiffi, thorn))\nPosit(thorn, shaine) and Posit(shaine, thorn) -> Clop(thorn, tiffi)\nforall x (Codify(x, bridget) and Codify(bridget, thorn) -> Northerly(x))\nforall x (Misshapen(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Clop(x, shaine) and Posit(x, bridget) -> Clop(shaine, thorn))\nforall x (Sporty(x) and Momentous(x) -> Posit(x, tiffi))\n\nClop(tiffi, thorn)\n\ntherefore Clop(tiffi, thorn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The annalisa is vinegarish. The muhammad toil the pascal. The muhammad accoutre the annalisa. The muhammad accoutre the derek. The pascal is attached. The pascal accoutre the annalisa. The pascal abseil the annalisa. The pascal abseil the muhammad. The derek toil the annalisa. The derek toil the muhammad. The derek is attached. The derek is shipboard. If the derek toil the muhammad then the derek is vinegarish. If someone toil the annalisa then the annalisa accoutre the muhammad. If someone is attached and they need the pascal then the pascal abseil the annalisa. If the annalisa toil the muhammad and the muhammad toil the annalisa then the annalisa abseil the pascal. If someone accoutre the derek and the derek accoutre the annalisa then they are runny. Round people are shipboard. If someone abseil the muhammad and they chase the derek then the muhammad abseil the annalisa. If someone is vinegarish and attached then they chase the pascal. The muhammad does not chase the pascal.", "logic": "\nVinegarish(annalisa)\nToil(muhammad, pascal)\nAccoutre(muhammad, annalisa)\nAccoutre(muhammad, derek)\nAttached(pascal)\nAccoutre(pascal, annalisa)\nAbseil(pascal, annalisa)\nAbseil(pascal, muhammad)\nToil(derek, annalisa)\nToil(derek, muhammad)\nAttached(derek)\nShipboard(derek)\nToil(derek, muhammad) -> Vinegarish(derek)\nforall x (Toil(x, annalisa) -> Accoutre(annalisa, muhammad))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Accoutre(x, pascal) -> Abseil(pascal, annalisa))\nToil(annalisa, muhammad) and Toil(muhammad, annalisa) -> Abseil(annalisa, pascal)\nforall x (Accoutre(x, derek) and Accoutre(derek, annalisa) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Summary(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Abseil(x, muhammad) and Toil(x, derek) -> Abseil(muhammad, annalisa))\nforall x (Vinegarish(x) and Attached(x) -> Toil(x, pascal))\n\nnot Toil(muhammad, pascal)\n\ntherefore Toil(muhammad, pascal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The reeva is priceless. The jefferey treble the helga. The jefferey unbosom the reeva. The jefferey unbosom the taite. The helga is prudish. The helga unbosom the reeva. The helga yawl the reeva. The helga yawl the jefferey. The taite treble the reeva. The taite treble the jefferey. The taite is prudish. The taite is chilly. If the taite treble the jefferey then the taite is priceless. If someone treble the reeva then the reeva unbosom the jefferey. If someone is prudish and they need the helga then the helga yawl the reeva. If the reeva treble the jefferey and the jefferey treble the reeva then the reeva yawl the helga. If someone unbosom the taite and the taite unbosom the reeva then they are plumbable. Round people are chilly. If someone yawl the jefferey and they chase the taite then the jefferey yawl the reeva. If someone is priceless and prudish then they chase the helga. The reeva unbosom the jefferey.", "logic": "\nPriceless(reeva)\nTreble(jefferey, helga)\nUnbosom(jefferey, reeva)\nUnbosom(jefferey, taite)\nPrudish(helga)\nUnbosom(helga, reeva)\nYawl(helga, reeva)\nYawl(helga, jefferey)\nTreble(taite, reeva)\nTreble(taite, jefferey)\nPrudish(taite)\nChilly(taite)\nTreble(taite, jefferey) -> Priceless(taite)\nforall x (Treble(x, reeva) -> Unbosom(reeva, jefferey))\nforall x (Prudish(x) and Unbosom(x, helga) -> Yawl(helga, reeva))\nTreble(reeva, jefferey) and Treble(jefferey, reeva) -> Yawl(reeva, helga)\nforall x (Unbosom(x, taite) and Unbosom(taite, reeva) -> Plumbable(x))\nforall x (Myopic(x) -> Chilly(x))\nforall x (Yawl(x, jefferey) and Treble(x, taite) -> Yawl(jefferey, reeva))\nforall x (Priceless(x) and Prudish(x) -> Treble(x, helga))\n\nUnbosom(reeva, jefferey)\n\nTreble(taite, reeva) and forall x (Treble(x, reeva) -> Unbosom(reeva, jefferey)) -> therefore Unbosom(reeva, jefferey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The gallagher is infrasonic. The allin transition the elora. The allin simonize the gallagher. The allin simonize the tedra. The elora is personal. The elora simonize the gallagher. The elora pouch the gallagher. The elora pouch the allin. The tedra transition the gallagher. The tedra transition the allin. The tedra is personal. The tedra is penetrable. If the tedra transition the allin then the tedra is infrasonic. If someone transition the gallagher then the gallagher simonize the allin. If someone is personal and they need the elora then the elora pouch the gallagher. If the gallagher transition the allin and the allin transition the gallagher then the gallagher pouch the elora. If someone simonize the tedra and the tedra simonize the gallagher then they are ineligible. Round people are penetrable. If someone pouch the allin and they chase the tedra then the allin pouch the gallagher. If someone is infrasonic and personal then they chase the elora. The gallagher does not need the allin.", "logic": "\nInfrasonic(gallagher)\nTransition(allin, elora)\nSimonize(allin, gallagher)\nSimonize(allin, tedra)\nPersonal(elora)\nSimonize(elora, gallagher)\nPouch(elora, gallagher)\nPouch(elora, allin)\nTransition(tedra, gallagher)\nTransition(tedra, allin)\nPersonal(tedra)\nPenetrable(tedra)\nTransition(tedra, allin) -> Infrasonic(tedra)\nforall x (Transition(x, gallagher) -> Simonize(gallagher, allin))\nforall x (Personal(x) and Simonize(x, elora) -> Pouch(elora, gallagher))\nTransition(gallagher, allin) and Transition(allin, gallagher) -> Pouch(gallagher, elora)\nforall x (Simonize(x, tedra) and Simonize(tedra, gallagher) -> Ineligible(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) -> Penetrable(x))\nforall x (Pouch(x, allin) and Transition(x, tedra) -> Pouch(allin, gallagher))\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) and Personal(x) -> Transition(x, elora))\n\nnot Simonize(gallagher, allin)\n\nTransition(tedra, gallagher) and forall x (Transition(x, gallagher) -> Simonize(gallagher, allin)) -> therefore Simonize(gallagher, allin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The magnus is paperback. The stew rupture the klaus. The stew eddy the magnus. The stew eddy the emilia. The klaus is lumpen. The klaus eddy the magnus. The klaus french the magnus. The klaus french the stew. The emilia rupture the magnus. The emilia rupture the stew. The emilia is lumpen. The emilia is compounded. If the emilia rupture the stew then the emilia is paperback. If someone rupture the magnus then the magnus eddy the stew. If someone is lumpen and they need the klaus then the klaus french the magnus. If the magnus rupture the stew and the stew rupture the magnus then the magnus french the klaus. If someone eddy the emilia and the emilia eddy the magnus then they are erect. Round people are compounded. If someone french the stew and they chase the emilia then the stew french the magnus. If someone is paperback and lumpen then they chase the klaus. The emilia rupture the klaus.", "logic": "\nPaperback(magnus)\nRupture(stew, klaus)\nEddy(stew, magnus)\nEddy(stew, emilia)\nLumpen(klaus)\nEddy(klaus, magnus)\nFrench(klaus, magnus)\nFrench(klaus, stew)\nRupture(emilia, magnus)\nRupture(emilia, stew)\nLumpen(emilia)\nCompounded(emilia)\nRupture(emilia, stew) -> Paperback(emilia)\nforall x (Rupture(x, magnus) -> Eddy(magnus, stew))\nforall x (Lumpen(x) and Eddy(x, klaus) -> French(klaus, magnus))\nRupture(magnus, stew) and Rupture(stew, magnus) -> French(magnus, klaus)\nforall x (Eddy(x, emilia) and Eddy(emilia, magnus) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Compounded(x))\nforall x (French(x, stew) and Rupture(x, emilia) -> French(stew, magnus))\nforall x (Paperback(x) and Lumpen(x) -> Rupture(x, klaus))\n\nRupture(emilia, klaus)\n\nRupture(emilia, stew) and Rupture(emilia, stew) -> Paperback(emilia) -> therefore Paperback(emilia) Paperback(emilia) and Lumpen(emilia) and forall x (Paperback(x) and Lumpen(x) -> Rupture(x, klaus)) -> therefore Rupture(emilia, klaus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The aubrie is pilotless. The blondell bluff the ambrosia. The blondell factorize the aubrie. The blondell factorize the thornie. The ambrosia is consummate. The ambrosia factorize the aubrie. The ambrosia wrong the aubrie. The ambrosia wrong the blondell. The thornie bluff the aubrie. The thornie bluff the blondell. The thornie is consummate. The thornie is oldish. If the thornie bluff the blondell then the thornie is pilotless. If someone bluff the aubrie then the aubrie factorize the blondell. If someone is consummate and they need the ambrosia then the ambrosia wrong the aubrie. If the aubrie bluff the blondell and the blondell bluff the aubrie then the aubrie wrong the ambrosia. If someone factorize the thornie and the thornie factorize the aubrie then they are embroiled. Round people are oldish. If someone wrong the blondell and they chase the thornie then the blondell wrong the aubrie. If someone is pilotless and consummate then they chase the ambrosia. The thornie does not chase the ambrosia.", "logic": "\nPilotless(aubrie)\nBluff(blondell, ambrosia)\nFactorize(blondell, aubrie)\nFactorize(blondell, thornie)\nConsummate(ambrosia)\nFactorize(ambrosia, aubrie)\nWrong(ambrosia, aubrie)\nWrong(ambrosia, blondell)\nBluff(thornie, aubrie)\nBluff(thornie, blondell)\nConsummate(thornie)\nOldish(thornie)\nBluff(thornie, blondell) -> Pilotless(thornie)\nforall x (Bluff(x, aubrie) -> Factorize(aubrie, blondell))\nforall x (Consummate(x) and Factorize(x, ambrosia) -> Wrong(ambrosia, aubrie))\nBluff(aubrie, blondell) and Bluff(blondell, aubrie) -> Wrong(aubrie, ambrosia)\nforall x (Factorize(x, thornie) and Factorize(thornie, aubrie) -> Embroiled(x))\nforall x (Outlandish(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x, blondell) and Bluff(x, thornie) -> Wrong(blondell, aubrie))\nforall x (Pilotless(x) and Consummate(x) -> Bluff(x, ambrosia))\n\nnot Bluff(thornie, ambrosia)\n\nBluff(thornie, blondell) and Bluff(thornie, blondell) -> Pilotless(thornie) -> therefore Pilotless(thornie) Pilotless(thornie) and Consummate(thornie) and forall x (Pilotless(x) and Consummate(x) -> Bluff(x, ambrosia)) -> therefore Bluff(thornie, ambrosia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The genia is dislocated. The odelinda spell the lauretta. The odelinda home the genia. The odelinda home the doralynn. The lauretta is sabbatical. The lauretta home the genia. The lauretta birdlime the genia. The lauretta birdlime the odelinda. The doralynn spell the genia. The doralynn spell the odelinda. The doralynn is sabbatical. The doralynn is unhealed. If the doralynn spell the odelinda then the doralynn is dislocated. If someone spell the genia then the genia home the odelinda. If someone is sabbatical and they need the lauretta then the lauretta birdlime the genia. If the genia spell the odelinda and the odelinda spell the genia then the genia birdlime the lauretta. If someone home the doralynn and the doralynn home the genia then they are pitiless. Round people are unhealed. If someone birdlime the odelinda and they chase the doralynn then the odelinda birdlime the genia. If someone is dislocated and sabbatical then they chase the lauretta. The odelinda does not see the genia.", "logic": "\nDislocated(genia)\nSpell(odelinda, lauretta)\nHome(odelinda, genia)\nHome(odelinda, doralynn)\nSabbatical(lauretta)\nHome(lauretta, genia)\nBirdlime(lauretta, genia)\nBirdlime(lauretta, odelinda)\nSpell(doralynn, genia)\nSpell(doralynn, odelinda)\nSabbatical(doralynn)\nUnhealed(doralynn)\nSpell(doralynn, odelinda) -> Dislocated(doralynn)\nforall x (Spell(x, genia) -> Home(genia, odelinda))\nforall x (Sabbatical(x) and Home(x, lauretta) -> Birdlime(lauretta, genia))\nSpell(genia, odelinda) and Spell(odelinda, genia) -> Birdlime(genia, lauretta)\nforall x (Home(x, doralynn) and Home(doralynn, genia) -> Pitiless(x))\nforall x (Soldierly(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Birdlime(x, odelinda) and Spell(x, doralynn) -> Birdlime(odelinda, genia))\nforall x (Dislocated(x) and Sabbatical(x) -> Spell(x, lauretta))\n\nnot Birdlime(odelinda, genia)\n\nforall x (Birdlime(x, odelinda) and Spell(x, doralynn) -> Birdlime(odelinda, genia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The canada is reasonable. The jasmina spot the dorri. The jasmina reship the canada. The jasmina reship the edith. The dorri is weighty. The dorri reship the canada. The dorri wham the canada. The dorri wham the jasmina. The edith spot the canada. The edith spot the jasmina. The edith is weighty. The edith is arteriolar. If the edith spot the jasmina then the edith is reasonable. If someone spot the canada then the canada reship the jasmina. If someone is weighty and they need the dorri then the dorri wham the canada. If the canada spot the jasmina and the jasmina spot the canada then the canada wham the dorri. If someone reship the edith and the edith reship the canada then they are smallish. Round people are arteriolar. If someone wham the jasmina and they chase the edith then the jasmina wham the canada. If someone is reasonable and weighty then they chase the dorri. The dorri is smallish.", "logic": "\nReasonable(canada)\nSpot(jasmina, dorri)\nReship(jasmina, canada)\nReship(jasmina, edith)\nWeighty(dorri)\nReship(dorri, canada)\nWham(dorri, canada)\nWham(dorri, jasmina)\nSpot(edith, canada)\nSpot(edith, jasmina)\nWeighty(edith)\nArteriolar(edith)\nSpot(edith, jasmina) -> Reasonable(edith)\nforall x (Spot(x, canada) -> Reship(canada, jasmina))\nforall x (Weighty(x) and Reship(x, dorri) -> Wham(dorri, canada))\nSpot(canada, jasmina) and Spot(jasmina, canada) -> Wham(canada, dorri)\nforall x (Reship(x, edith) and Reship(edith, canada) -> Smallish(x))\nforall x (Curable(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nforall x (Wham(x, jasmina) and Spot(x, edith) -> Wham(jasmina, canada))\nforall x (Reasonable(x) and Weighty(x) -> Spot(x, dorri))\n\nSmallish(dorri)\n\nforall x (Reship(x, edith) and Reship(edith, canada) -> Smallish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The romeo is precursory. The carolynn analogise the tersina. The carolynn fink the romeo. The carolynn fink the wilbert. The tersina is endocrine. The tersina fink the romeo. The tersina colly the romeo. The tersina colly the carolynn. The wilbert analogise the romeo. The wilbert analogise the carolynn. The wilbert is endocrine. The wilbert is shapeless. If the wilbert analogise the carolynn then the wilbert is precursory. If someone analogise the romeo then the romeo fink the carolynn. If someone is endocrine and they need the tersina then the tersina colly the romeo. If the romeo analogise the carolynn and the carolynn analogise the romeo then the romeo colly the tersina. If someone fink the wilbert and the wilbert fink the romeo then they are prostate. Round people are shapeless. If someone colly the carolynn and they chase the wilbert then the carolynn colly the romeo. If someone is precursory and endocrine then they chase the tersina. The romeo does not see the tersina.", "logic": "\nPrecursory(romeo)\nAnalogise(carolynn, tersina)\nFink(carolynn, romeo)\nFink(carolynn, wilbert)\nEndocrine(tersina)\nFink(tersina, romeo)\nColly(tersina, romeo)\nColly(tersina, carolynn)\nAnalogise(wilbert, romeo)\nAnalogise(wilbert, carolynn)\nEndocrine(wilbert)\nShapeless(wilbert)\nAnalogise(wilbert, carolynn) -> Precursory(wilbert)\nforall x (Analogise(x, romeo) -> Fink(romeo, carolynn))\nforall x (Endocrine(x) and Fink(x, tersina) -> Colly(tersina, romeo))\nAnalogise(romeo, carolynn) and Analogise(carolynn, romeo) -> Colly(romeo, tersina)\nforall x (Fink(x, wilbert) and Fink(wilbert, romeo) -> Prostate(x))\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Colly(x, carolynn) and Analogise(x, wilbert) -> Colly(carolynn, romeo))\nforall x (Precursory(x) and Endocrine(x) -> Analogise(x, tersina))\n\nnot Colly(romeo, tersina)\n\nAnalogise(romeo, carolynn) and Analogise(carolynn, romeo) -> Colly(romeo, tersina) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The tommy is tetchy. The audra reconvert the eran. The audra detick the tommy. The audra detick the johnathon. The eran is expandible. The eran detick the tommy. The eran colonise the tommy. The eran colonise the audra. The johnathon reconvert the tommy. The johnathon reconvert the audra. The johnathon is expandible. The johnathon is manual. If the johnathon reconvert the audra then the johnathon is tetchy. If someone reconvert the tommy then the tommy detick the audra. If someone is expandible and they need the eran then the eran colonise the tommy. If the tommy reconvert the audra and the audra reconvert the tommy then the tommy colonise the eran. If someone detick the johnathon and the johnathon detick the tommy then they are insensate. Round people are manual. If someone colonise the audra and they chase the johnathon then the audra colonise the tommy. If someone is tetchy and expandible then they chase the eran. The tommy colonise the tommy.", "logic": "\nTetchy(tommy)\nReconvert(audra, eran)\nDetick(audra, tommy)\nDetick(audra, johnathon)\nExpandible(eran)\nDetick(eran, tommy)\nColonise(eran, tommy)\nColonise(eran, audra)\nReconvert(johnathon, tommy)\nReconvert(johnathon, audra)\nExpandible(johnathon)\nManual(johnathon)\nReconvert(johnathon, audra) -> Tetchy(johnathon)\nforall x (Reconvert(x, tommy) -> Detick(tommy, audra))\nforall x (Expandible(x) and Detick(x, eran) -> Colonise(eran, tommy))\nReconvert(tommy, audra) and Reconvert(audra, tommy) -> Colonise(tommy, eran)\nforall x (Detick(x, johnathon) and Detick(johnathon, tommy) -> Insensate(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) -> Manual(x))\nforall x (Colonise(x, audra) and Reconvert(x, johnathon) -> Colonise(audra, tommy))\nforall x (Tetchy(x) and Expandible(x) -> Reconvert(x, eran))\n\nColonise(tommy, tommy)\n\nColonise(tommy, tommy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The leslie is imputable. The joel retransmit the upton. The joel draught the leslie. The joel draught the kimberlyn. The upton is uneconomic. The upton draught the leslie. The upton emblazon the leslie. The upton emblazon the joel. The kimberlyn retransmit the leslie. The kimberlyn retransmit the joel. The kimberlyn is uneconomic. The kimberlyn is suboceanic. If the kimberlyn retransmit the joel then the kimberlyn is imputable. If someone retransmit the leslie then the leslie draught the joel. If someone is uneconomic and they need the upton then the upton emblazon the leslie. If the leslie retransmit the joel and the joel retransmit the leslie then the leslie emblazon the upton. If someone draught the kimberlyn and the kimberlyn draught the leslie then they are unemphatic. Round people are suboceanic. If someone emblazon the joel and they chase the kimberlyn then the joel emblazon the leslie. If someone is imputable and uneconomic then they chase the upton. The upton does not chase the leslie.", "logic": "\nImputable(leslie)\nRetransmit(joel, upton)\nDraught(joel, leslie)\nDraught(joel, kimberlyn)\nUneconomic(upton)\nDraught(upton, leslie)\nEmblazon(upton, leslie)\nEmblazon(upton, joel)\nRetransmit(kimberlyn, leslie)\nRetransmit(kimberlyn, joel)\nUneconomic(kimberlyn)\nSuboceanic(kimberlyn)\nRetransmit(kimberlyn, joel) -> Imputable(kimberlyn)\nforall x (Retransmit(x, leslie) -> Draught(leslie, joel))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) and Draught(x, upton) -> Emblazon(upton, leslie))\nRetransmit(leslie, joel) and Retransmit(joel, leslie) -> Emblazon(leslie, upton)\nforall x (Draught(x, kimberlyn) and Draught(kimberlyn, leslie) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Emblazon(x, joel) and Retransmit(x, kimberlyn) -> Emblazon(joel, leslie))\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Uneconomic(x) -> Retransmit(x, upton))\n\nnot Retransmit(upton, leslie)\n\nnot Retransmit(upton, leslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The eirena is nonuple. The eduard double the rosette. The eduard form the eirena. The eduard form the iggy. The rosette is oneiric. The rosette form the eirena. The rosette squeeze the eirena. The rosette squeeze the eduard. The iggy double the eirena. The iggy double the eduard. The iggy is oneiric. The iggy is lactating. If the iggy double the eduard then the iggy is nonuple. If someone double the eirena then the eirena form the eduard. If someone is oneiric and they need the rosette then the rosette squeeze the eirena. If the eirena double the eduard and the eduard double the eirena then the eirena squeeze the rosette. If someone form the iggy and the iggy form the eirena then they are triploid. Round people are lactating. If someone squeeze the eduard and they chase the iggy then the eduard squeeze the eirena. If someone is nonuple and oneiric then they chase the rosette. The rosette is nonuple.", "logic": "\nNonuple(eirena)\nDouble(eduard, rosette)\nForm(eduard, eirena)\nForm(eduard, iggy)\nOneiric(rosette)\nForm(rosette, eirena)\nSqueeze(rosette, eirena)\nSqueeze(rosette, eduard)\nDouble(iggy, eirena)\nDouble(iggy, eduard)\nOneiric(iggy)\nLactating(iggy)\nDouble(iggy, eduard) -> Nonuple(iggy)\nforall x (Double(x, eirena) -> Form(eirena, eduard))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Form(x, rosette) -> Squeeze(rosette, eirena))\nDouble(eirena, eduard) and Double(eduard, eirena) -> Squeeze(eirena, rosette)\nforall x (Form(x, iggy) and Form(iggy, eirena) -> Triploid(x))\nforall x (Thudding(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, eduard) and Double(x, iggy) -> Squeeze(eduard, eirena))\nforall x (Nonuple(x) and Oneiric(x) -> Double(x, rosette))\n\nNonuple(rosette)\n\nNonuple(rosette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-288"} {"premises": "The boris is chainlike. If the boris is getatable then the boris is chainlike. Red people are sizable. Green people are severed. All chainlike people are getatable. If the boris is chainlike and the boris is not sizable then the boris is downwind. If the boris is not downwind then the boris is severed. The boris is chainlike.", "logic": "\nChainlike(boris)\nGetatable(boris) -> Chainlike(boris)\nforall x (Getatable(x) -> Sizable(x))\nforall x (Sizable(x) -> Severed(x))\nforall x (Chainlike(x) -> Getatable(x))\nChainlike(boris) and not Sizable(boris) -> Downwind(boris)\nnot Downwind(boris) -> Severed(boris)\n\nChainlike(boris)\n\ntherefore Chainlike(boris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The winonah is tailored. If the winonah is humified then the winonah is tailored. Red people are lesbian. Green people are wise. All tailored people are humified. If the winonah is tailored and the winonah is not lesbian then the winonah is unexcelled. If the winonah is not unexcelled then the winonah is wise. The winonah is not tailored.", "logic": "\nTailored(winonah)\nHumified(winonah) -> Tailored(winonah)\nforall x (Humified(x) -> Lesbian(x))\nforall x (Lesbian(x) -> Wise(x))\nforall x (Tailored(x) -> Humified(x))\nTailored(winonah) and not Lesbian(winonah) -> Unexcelled(winonah)\nnot Unexcelled(winonah) -> Wise(winonah)\n\nnot Tailored(winonah)\n\ntherefore Tailored(winonah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The biff is untagged. If the biff is positive then the biff is untagged. Red people are hemostatic. Green people are tottering. All untagged people are positive. If the biff is untagged and the biff is not hemostatic then the biff is alaskan. If the biff is not alaskan then the biff is tottering. The biff is positive.", "logic": "\nUntagged(biff)\nPositive(biff) -> Untagged(biff)\nforall x (Positive(x) -> Hemostatic(x))\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Untagged(x) -> Positive(x))\nUntagged(biff) and not Hemostatic(biff) -> Alaskan(biff)\nnot Alaskan(biff) -> Tottering(biff)\n\nPositive(biff)\n\nUntagged(biff) and forall x (Untagged(x) -> Positive(x)) -> therefore Positive(biff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The polly is humble. If the polly is feline then the polly is humble. Red people are sedgy. Green people are adulatory. All humble people are feline. If the polly is humble and the polly is not sedgy then the polly is libellous. If the polly is not libellous then the polly is adulatory. The polly is not feline.", "logic": "\nHumble(polly)\nFeline(polly) -> Humble(polly)\nforall x (Feline(x) -> Sedgy(x))\nforall x (Sedgy(x) -> Adulatory(x))\nforall x (Humble(x) -> Feline(x))\nHumble(polly) and not Sedgy(polly) -> Libellous(polly)\nnot Libellous(polly) -> Adulatory(polly)\n\nnot Feline(polly)\n\nHumble(polly) and forall x (Humble(x) -> Feline(x)) -> therefore Feline(polly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The dimitrou is exploitive. If the dimitrou is orbiculate then the dimitrou is exploitive. Red people are inducive. Green people are lesbian. All exploitive people are orbiculate. If the dimitrou is exploitive and the dimitrou is not inducive then the dimitrou is errorless. If the dimitrou is not errorless then the dimitrou is lesbian. The dimitrou is inducive.", "logic": "\nExploitive(dimitrou)\nOrbiculate(dimitrou) -> Exploitive(dimitrou)\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) -> Lesbian(x))\nforall x (Exploitive(x) -> Orbiculate(x))\nExploitive(dimitrou) and not Inducive(dimitrou) -> Errorless(dimitrou)\nnot Errorless(dimitrou) -> Lesbian(dimitrou)\n\nInducive(dimitrou)\n\nExploitive(dimitrou) and forall x (Exploitive(x) -> Orbiculate(x)) -> therefore Orbiculate(dimitrou) Orbiculate(dimitrou) and forall x (Orbiculate(x) -> Inducive(x)) -> therefore Inducive(dimitrou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The denni is aspheric. If the denni is reedlike then the denni is aspheric. Red people are sulfuric. Green people are exalting. All aspheric people are reedlike. If the denni is aspheric and the denni is not sulfuric then the denni is synonymous. If the denni is not synonymous then the denni is exalting. The denni is not sulfuric.", "logic": "\nAspheric(denni)\nReedlike(denni) -> Aspheric(denni)\nforall x (Reedlike(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> Reedlike(x))\nAspheric(denni) and not Sulfuric(denni) -> Synonymous(denni)\nnot Synonymous(denni) -> Exalting(denni)\n\nnot Sulfuric(denni)\n\nAspheric(denni) and forall x (Aspheric(x) -> Reedlike(x)) -> therefore Reedlike(denni) Reedlike(denni) and forall x (Reedlike(x) -> Sulfuric(x)) -> therefore Sulfuric(denni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The dido is pharisaic. If the dido is nonelected then the dido is pharisaic. Red people are rushlike. Green people are bonelike. All pharisaic people are nonelected. If the dido is pharisaic and the dido is not rushlike then the dido is cenozoic. If the dido is not cenozoic then the dido is bonelike. The dido is not cenozoic.", "logic": "\nPharisaic(dido)\nNonelected(dido) -> Pharisaic(dido)\nforall x (Nonelected(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) -> Bonelike(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nPharisaic(dido) and not Rushlike(dido) -> Cenozoic(dido)\nnot Cenozoic(dido) -> Bonelike(dido)\n\nnot Cenozoic(dido)\n\nPharisaic(dido) and not Rushlike(dido) -> Cenozoic(dido) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The hermia is refractile. If the hermia is shrinkable then the hermia is refractile. Red people are loosened. Green people are diadromous. All refractile people are shrinkable. If the hermia is refractile and the hermia is not loosened then the hermia is captive. If the hermia is not captive then the hermia is diadromous. The hermia chases the hermia.", "logic": "\nRefractile(hermia)\nShrinkable(hermia) -> Refractile(hermia)\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) -> Loosened(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) -> Diadromous(x))\nforall x (Refractile(x) -> Shrinkable(x))\nRefractile(hermia) and not Loosened(hermia) -> Captive(hermia)\nnot Captive(hermia) -> Diadromous(hermia)\n\nChases(hermia, hermia)\n\nChases(hermia, hermia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The nev is fatherly. If the nev is congeneric then the nev is fatherly. Red people are punctured. Green people are easygoing. All fatherly people are congeneric. If the nev is fatherly and the nev is not punctured then the nev is undesirous. If the nev is not undesirous then the nev is easygoing. The nev does not eat the nev.", "logic": "\nFatherly(nev)\nCongeneric(nev) -> Fatherly(nev)\nforall x (Congeneric(x) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Punctured(x) -> Easygoing(x))\nforall x (Fatherly(x) -> Congeneric(x))\nFatherly(nev) and not Punctured(nev) -> Undesirous(nev)\nnot Undesirous(nev) -> Easygoing(nev)\n\nnot Eats(nev, nev)\n\nnot Eats(nev, nev) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The selig is quadruped. If the selig is saltish then the selig is quadruped. Red people are catapultic. Green people are carangid. All quadruped people are saltish. If the selig is quadruped and the selig is not catapultic then the selig is doctrinal. If the selig is not doctrinal then the selig is carangid. The selig visits the selig.", "logic": "\nQuadruped(selig)\nSaltish(selig) -> Quadruped(selig)\nforall x (Saltish(x) -> Catapultic(x))\nforall x (Catapultic(x) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Quadruped(x) -> Saltish(x))\nQuadruped(selig) and not Catapultic(selig) -> Doctrinal(selig)\nnot Doctrinal(selig) -> Carangid(selig)\n\nVisits(selig, selig)\n\nVisits(selig, selig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-773"} {"premises": "The toinette await the morissa. The morissa is xcvii. The morissa await the toinette. If the toinette boil the morissa and the toinette is not xcvii then the toinette is uremic. If the toinette boil the morissa and the toinette is not broadnosed then the morissa await the toinette. If someone boil the morissa then the morissa await the toinette. If someone is uremic then they do not need the morissa. If someone is flocculent then they do not chase the morissa. If someone boil the morissa and the morissa boil the toinette then the toinette boil the morissa. If someone await the morissa then they are flocculent. If the morissa is broadnosed then the morissa is flocculent. The morissa is xcvii.", "logic": "\nAwait(toinette, morissa)\nXcvii(morissa)\nAwait(morissa, toinette)\nBoil(toinette, morissa) and not Xcvii(toinette) -> Uremic(toinette)\nBoil(toinette, morissa) and not Broadnosed(toinette) -> Await(morissa, toinette)\nforall x (Boil(x, morissa) -> Await(morissa, toinette))\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> not Await(x, morissa))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> not Immure(x, morissa))\nforall x (Boil(x, morissa) and Boil(morissa, toinette) -> Boil(toinette, morissa))\nforall x (Await(x, morissa) -> Flocculent(x))\nBroadnosed(morissa) -> Flocculent(morissa)\n\nXcvii(morissa)\n\ntherefore Xcvii(morissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The rosmunda waddle the tuck. The tuck is elliptical. The tuck waddle the rosmunda. If the rosmunda divine the tuck and the rosmunda is not elliptical then the rosmunda is pharaonic. If the rosmunda divine the tuck and the rosmunda is not osmotic then the tuck waddle the rosmunda. If someone divine the tuck then the tuck waddle the rosmunda. If someone is pharaonic then they do not need the tuck. If someone is bistred then they do not chase the tuck. If someone divine the tuck and the tuck divine the rosmunda then the rosmunda divine the tuck. If someone waddle the tuck then they are bistred. If the tuck is osmotic then the tuck is bistred. The tuck is not elliptical.", "logic": "\nWaddle(rosmunda, tuck)\nElliptical(tuck)\nWaddle(tuck, rosmunda)\nDivine(rosmunda, tuck) and not Elliptical(rosmunda) -> Pharaonic(rosmunda)\nDivine(rosmunda, tuck) and not Osmotic(rosmunda) -> Waddle(tuck, rosmunda)\nforall x (Divine(x, tuck) -> Waddle(tuck, rosmunda))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> not Waddle(x, tuck))\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> not Perceive(x, tuck))\nforall x (Divine(x, tuck) and Divine(tuck, rosmunda) -> Divine(rosmunda, tuck))\nforall x (Waddle(x, tuck) -> Bistred(x))\nOsmotic(tuck) -> Bistred(tuck)\n\nnot Elliptical(tuck)\n\ntherefore Elliptical(tuck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The coreen sabre the mirelle. The mirelle is triennial. The mirelle sabre the coreen. If the coreen wring the mirelle and the coreen is not triennial then the coreen is matured. If the coreen wring the mirelle and the coreen is not crusted then the mirelle sabre the coreen. If someone wring the mirelle then the mirelle sabre the coreen. If someone is matured then they do not need the mirelle. If someone is epidermal then they do not chase the mirelle. If someone wring the mirelle and the mirelle wring the coreen then the coreen wring the mirelle. If someone sabre the mirelle then they are epidermal. If the mirelle is crusted then the mirelle is epidermal. The coreen is epidermal.", "logic": "\nSabre(coreen, mirelle)\nTriennial(mirelle)\nSabre(mirelle, coreen)\nWring(coreen, mirelle) and not Triennial(coreen) -> Matured(coreen)\nWring(coreen, mirelle) and not Crusted(coreen) -> Sabre(mirelle, coreen)\nforall x (Wring(x, mirelle) -> Sabre(mirelle, coreen))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> not Sabre(x, mirelle))\nforall x (Epidermal(x) -> not Supplicate(x, mirelle))\nforall x (Wring(x, mirelle) and Wring(mirelle, coreen) -> Wring(coreen, mirelle))\nforall x (Sabre(x, mirelle) -> Epidermal(x))\nCrusted(mirelle) -> Epidermal(mirelle)\n\nEpidermal(coreen)\n\nSabre(coreen, mirelle) and forall x (Sabre(x, mirelle) -> Epidermal(x)) -> therefore Epidermal(coreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The kirk culminate the crista. The crista is backstage. The crista culminate the kirk. If the kirk falcon the crista and the kirk is not backstage then the kirk is plausible. If the kirk falcon the crista and the kirk is not cocky then the crista culminate the kirk. If someone falcon the crista then the crista culminate the kirk. If someone is plausible then they do not need the crista. If someone is bituminoid then they do not chase the crista. If someone falcon the crista and the crista falcon the kirk then the kirk falcon the crista. If someone culminate the crista then they are bituminoid. If the crista is cocky then the crista is bituminoid. The kirk is not bituminoid.", "logic": "\nCulminate(kirk, crista)\nBackstage(crista)\nCulminate(crista, kirk)\nFalcon(kirk, crista) and not Backstage(kirk) -> Plausible(kirk)\nFalcon(kirk, crista) and not Cocky(kirk) -> Culminate(crista, kirk)\nforall x (Falcon(x, crista) -> Culminate(crista, kirk))\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> not Culminate(x, crista))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> not Background(x, crista))\nforall x (Falcon(x, crista) and Falcon(crista, kirk) -> Falcon(kirk, crista))\nforall x (Culminate(x, crista) -> Bituminoid(x))\nCocky(crista) -> Bituminoid(crista)\n\nnot Bituminoid(kirk)\n\nCulminate(kirk, crista) and forall x (Culminate(x, crista) -> Bituminoid(x)) -> therefore Bituminoid(kirk)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The georgia alcoholise the gerome. The gerome is arctic. The gerome alcoholise the georgia. If the georgia church the gerome and the georgia is not arctic then the georgia is coupled. If the georgia church the gerome and the georgia is not despotic then the gerome alcoholise the georgia. If someone church the gerome then the gerome alcoholise the georgia. If someone is coupled then they do not need the gerome. If someone is worth then they do not chase the gerome. If someone church the gerome and the gerome church the georgia then the georgia church the gerome. If someone alcoholise the gerome then they are worth. If the gerome is despotic then the gerome is worth. The georgia does not chase the gerome.", "logic": "\nAlcoholise(georgia, gerome)\nArctic(gerome)\nAlcoholise(gerome, georgia)\nChurch(georgia, gerome) and not Arctic(georgia) -> Coupled(georgia)\nChurch(georgia, gerome) and not Despotic(georgia) -> Alcoholise(gerome, georgia)\nforall x (Church(x, gerome) -> Alcoholise(gerome, georgia))\nforall x (Coupled(x) -> not Alcoholise(x, gerome))\nforall x (Worth(x) -> not Respire(x, gerome))\nforall x (Church(x, gerome) and Church(gerome, georgia) -> Church(georgia, gerome))\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, gerome) -> Worth(x))\nDespotic(gerome) -> Worth(gerome)\n\nnot Respire(georgia, gerome)\n\nAlcoholise(georgia, gerome) and forall x (Alcoholise(x, gerome) -> Worth(x)) -> therefore Worth(georgia) Worth(georgia) and forall x (Worth(x) -> not Respire(x, gerome)) -> therefore not Respire(georgia, gerome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The ambrosius race the lillian. The lillian is lipped. The lillian race the ambrosius. If the ambrosius joint the lillian and the ambrosius is not lipped then the ambrosius is fatal. If the ambrosius joint the lillian and the ambrosius is not peccant then the lillian race the ambrosius. If someone joint the lillian then the lillian race the ambrosius. If someone is fatal then they do not need the lillian. If someone is sonsie then they do not chase the lillian. If someone joint the lillian and the lillian joint the ambrosius then the ambrosius joint the lillian. If someone race the lillian then they are sonsie. If the lillian is peccant then the lillian is sonsie. The ambrosius prelude the lillian.", "logic": "\nRace(ambrosius, lillian)\nLipped(lillian)\nRace(lillian, ambrosius)\nJoint(ambrosius, lillian) and not Lipped(ambrosius) -> Fatal(ambrosius)\nJoint(ambrosius, lillian) and not Peccant(ambrosius) -> Race(lillian, ambrosius)\nforall x (Joint(x, lillian) -> Race(lillian, ambrosius))\nforall x (Fatal(x) -> not Race(x, lillian))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) -> not Prelude(x, lillian))\nforall x (Joint(x, lillian) and Joint(lillian, ambrosius) -> Joint(ambrosius, lillian))\nforall x (Race(x, lillian) -> Sonsie(x))\nPeccant(lillian) -> Sonsie(lillian)\n\nPrelude(ambrosius, lillian)\n\nRace(ambrosius, lillian) and forall x (Race(x, lillian) -> Sonsie(x)) -> therefore Sonsie(ambrosius) Sonsie(ambrosius) and forall x (Sonsie(x) -> not Prelude(x, lillian)) -> therefore not Prelude(ambrosius, lillian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The callida canopy the foster. The foster is unplanted. The foster canopy the callida. If the callida chamfer the foster and the callida is not unplanted then the callida is corbelled. If the callida chamfer the foster and the callida is not bathyal then the foster canopy the callida. If someone chamfer the foster then the foster canopy the callida. If someone is corbelled then they do not need the foster. If someone is seventh then they do not chase the foster. If someone chamfer the foster and the foster chamfer the callida then the callida chamfer the foster. If someone canopy the foster then they are seventh. If the foster is bathyal then the foster is seventh. The callida does not eat the foster.", "logic": "\nCanopy(callida, foster)\nUnplanted(foster)\nCanopy(foster, callida)\nChamfer(callida, foster) and not Unplanted(callida) -> Corbelled(callida)\nChamfer(callida, foster) and not Bathyal(callida) -> Canopy(foster, callida)\nforall x (Chamfer(x, foster) -> Canopy(foster, callida))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> not Canopy(x, foster))\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> not Slosh(x, foster))\nforall x (Chamfer(x, foster) and Chamfer(foster, callida) -> Chamfer(callida, foster))\nforall x (Canopy(x, foster) -> Seventh(x))\nBathyal(foster) -> Seventh(foster)\n\nnot Chamfer(callida, foster)\n\nforall x (Chamfer(x, foster) and Chamfer(foster, callida) -> Chamfer(callida, foster)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The lela eschew the norri. The norri is worldwide. The norri eschew the lela. If the lela unsay the norri and the lela is not worldwide then the lela is pathless. If the lela unsay the norri and the lela is not bounteous then the norri eschew the lela. If someone unsay the norri then the norri eschew the lela. If someone is pathless then they do not need the norri. If someone is tenured then they do not chase the norri. If someone unsay the norri and the norri unsay the lela then the lela unsay the norri. If someone eschew the norri then they are tenured. If the norri is bounteous then the norri is tenured. The norri is tenured.", "logic": "\nEschew(lela, norri)\nWorldwide(norri)\nEschew(norri, lela)\nUnsay(lela, norri) and not Worldwide(lela) -> Pathless(lela)\nUnsay(lela, norri) and not Bounteous(lela) -> Eschew(norri, lela)\nforall x (Unsay(x, norri) -> Eschew(norri, lela))\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> not Eschew(x, norri))\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> not Splat(x, norri))\nforall x (Unsay(x, norri) and Unsay(norri, lela) -> Unsay(lela, norri))\nforall x (Eschew(x, norri) -> Tenured(x))\nBounteous(norri) -> Tenured(norri)\n\nTenured(norri)\n\nforall x (Eschew(x, norri) -> Tenured(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The solomon supple the giordano. The giordano is avowed. The giordano supple the solomon. If the solomon bach the giordano and the solomon is not avowed then the solomon is xxii. If the solomon bach the giordano and the solomon is not slapdash then the giordano supple the solomon. If someone bach the giordano then the giordano supple the solomon. If someone is xxii then they do not need the giordano. If someone is quadruped then they do not chase the giordano. If someone bach the giordano and the giordano bach the solomon then the solomon bach the giordano. If someone supple the giordano then they are quadruped. If the giordano is slapdash then the giordano is quadruped. The solomon is not xxii.", "logic": "\nSupple(solomon, giordano)\nAvowed(giordano)\nSupple(giordano, solomon)\nBach(solomon, giordano) and not Avowed(solomon) -> Xxii(solomon)\nBach(solomon, giordano) and not Slapdash(solomon) -> Supple(giordano, solomon)\nforall x (Bach(x, giordano) -> Supple(giordano, solomon))\nforall x (Xxii(x) -> not Supple(x, giordano))\nforall x (Quadruped(x) -> not Batfowl(x, giordano))\nforall x (Bach(x, giordano) and Bach(giordano, solomon) -> Bach(solomon, giordano))\nforall x (Supple(x, giordano) -> Quadruped(x))\nSlapdash(giordano) -> Quadruped(giordano)\n\nnot Xxii(solomon)\n\nBach(solomon, giordano) and not Avowed(solomon) -> Xxii(solomon) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The rosemary grunt the letty. The letty is necked. The letty grunt the rosemary. If the rosemary support the letty and the rosemary is not necked then the rosemary is assistive. If the rosemary support the letty and the rosemary is not petalless then the letty grunt the rosemary. If someone support the letty then the letty grunt the rosemary. If someone is assistive then they do not need the letty. If someone is hydrated then they do not chase the letty. If someone support the letty and the letty support the rosemary then the rosemary support the letty. If someone grunt the letty then they are hydrated. If the letty is petalless then the letty is hydrated. The letty grunt the letty.", "logic": "\nGrunt(rosemary, letty)\nNecked(letty)\nGrunt(letty, rosemary)\nSupport(rosemary, letty) and not Necked(rosemary) -> Assistive(rosemary)\nSupport(rosemary, letty) and not Petalless(rosemary) -> Grunt(letty, rosemary)\nforall x (Support(x, letty) -> Grunt(letty, rosemary))\nforall x (Assistive(x) -> not Grunt(x, letty))\nforall x (Hydrated(x) -> not Underlie(x, letty))\nforall x (Support(x, letty) and Support(letty, rosemary) -> Support(rosemary, letty))\nforall x (Grunt(x, letty) -> Hydrated(x))\nPetalless(letty) -> Hydrated(letty)\n\nGrunt(letty, letty)\n\nGrunt(letty, letty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The felisha prostitute the tilly. The tilly is comparable. The tilly prostitute the felisha. If the felisha realise the tilly and the felisha is not comparable then the felisha is collarless. If the felisha realise the tilly and the felisha is not dirty then the tilly prostitute the felisha. If someone realise the tilly then the tilly prostitute the felisha. If someone is collarless then they do not need the tilly. If someone is wonted then they do not chase the tilly. If someone realise the tilly and the tilly realise the felisha then the felisha realise the tilly. If someone prostitute the tilly then they are wonted. If the tilly is dirty then the tilly is wonted. The felisha is not green.", "logic": "\nProstitute(felisha, tilly)\nComparable(tilly)\nProstitute(tilly, felisha)\nRealise(felisha, tilly) and not Comparable(felisha) -> Collarless(felisha)\nRealise(felisha, tilly) and not Dirty(felisha) -> Prostitute(tilly, felisha)\nforall x (Realise(x, tilly) -> Prostitute(tilly, felisha))\nforall x (Collarless(x) -> not Prostitute(x, tilly))\nforall x (Wonted(x) -> not Adapt(x, tilly))\nforall x (Realise(x, tilly) and Realise(tilly, felisha) -> Realise(felisha, tilly))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, tilly) -> Wonted(x))\nDirty(tilly) -> Wonted(tilly)\n\nnot Green(felisha)\n\nnot Green(felisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The vallie salivate the kimberly. The kimberly is affixial. The kimberly salivate the vallie. If the vallie butterfly the kimberly and the vallie is not affixial then the vallie is jumbo. If the vallie butterfly the kimberly and the vallie is not perfumed then the kimberly salivate the vallie. If someone butterfly the kimberly then the kimberly salivate the vallie. If someone is jumbo then they do not need the kimberly. If someone is bottommost then they do not chase the kimberly. If someone butterfly the kimberly and the kimberly butterfly the vallie then the vallie butterfly the kimberly. If someone salivate the kimberly then they are bottommost. If the kimberly is perfumed then the kimberly is bottommost. The vallie is perfumed.", "logic": "\nSalivate(vallie, kimberly)\nAffixial(kimberly)\nSalivate(kimberly, vallie)\nButterfly(vallie, kimberly) and not Affixial(vallie) -> Jumbo(vallie)\nButterfly(vallie, kimberly) and not Perfumed(vallie) -> Salivate(kimberly, vallie)\nforall x (Butterfly(x, kimberly) -> Salivate(kimberly, vallie))\nforall x (Jumbo(x) -> not Salivate(x, kimberly))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> not Laicize(x, kimberly))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, kimberly) and Butterfly(kimberly, vallie) -> Butterfly(vallie, kimberly))\nforall x (Salivate(x, kimberly) -> Bottommost(x))\nPerfumed(kimberly) -> Bottommost(kimberly)\n\nPerfumed(vallie)\n\nPerfumed(vallie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The ruthe outdraw the roseann. The bret is besprent. The roseann is aching. The marco outdraw the bret. If something is besprent then it seclude the ruthe. If something seclude the ruthe then it seclude the marco. The marco outdraw the bret.", "logic": "\nOutdraw(ruthe, roseann)\nBesprent(bret)\nAching(roseann)\nOutdraw(marco, bret)\nforall x (Besprent(x) -> Seclude(x, ruthe))\nforall x (Seclude(x, ruthe) -> Seclude(x, marco))\n\nOutdraw(marco, bret)\n\ntherefore Outdraw(marco, bret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The helene beard the joelly. The andri is systemic. The joelly is resupine. The heide beard the andri. If something is systemic then it writhe the helene. If something writhe the helene then it writhe the heide. The joelly is not resupine.", "logic": "\nBeard(helene, joelly)\nSystemic(andri)\nResupine(joelly)\nBeard(heide, andri)\nforall x (Systemic(x) -> Writhe(x, helene))\nforall x (Writhe(x, helene) -> Writhe(x, heide))\n\nnot Resupine(joelly)\n\ntherefore Resupine(joelly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The bertine spurt the eula. The marinna is dizzy. The eula is perturbed. The charo spurt the marinna. If something is dizzy then it fossilise the bertine. If something fossilise the bertine then it fossilise the charo. The marinna fossilise the bertine.", "logic": "\nSpurt(bertine, eula)\nDizzy(marinna)\nPerturbed(eula)\nSpurt(charo, marinna)\nforall x (Dizzy(x) -> Fossilise(x, bertine))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, bertine) -> Fossilise(x, charo))\n\nFossilise(marinna, bertine)\n\nDizzy(marinna) and forall x (Dizzy(x) -> Fossilise(x, bertine)) -> therefore Fossilise(marinna, bertine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The wayland judder the osborne. The verina is unborn. The osborne is septate. The halley judder the verina. If something is unborn then it dismay the wayland. If something dismay the wayland then it dismay the halley. The verina does not need the wayland.", "logic": "\nJudder(wayland, osborne)\nUnborn(verina)\nSeptate(osborne)\nJudder(halley, verina)\nforall x (Unborn(x) -> Dismay(x, wayland))\nforall x (Dismay(x, wayland) -> Dismay(x, halley))\n\nnot Dismay(verina, wayland)\n\nUnborn(verina) and forall x (Unborn(x) -> Dismay(x, wayland)) -> therefore Dismay(verina, wayland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The mirabel trip the teressa. The modesta is myelic. The teressa is cognisable. The francois trip the modesta. If something is myelic then it repaint the mirabel. If something repaint the mirabel then it repaint the francois. The modesta repaint the francois.", "logic": "\nTrip(mirabel, teressa)\nMyelic(modesta)\nCognisable(teressa)\nTrip(francois, modesta)\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Repaint(x, mirabel))\nforall x (Repaint(x, mirabel) -> Repaint(x, francois))\n\nRepaint(modesta, francois)\n\nMyelic(modesta) and forall x (Myelic(x) -> Repaint(x, mirabel)) -> therefore Repaint(modesta, mirabel) Repaint(modesta, mirabel) and forall x (Repaint(x, mirabel) -> Repaint(x, francois)) -> therefore Repaint(modesta, francois)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The valaria disrobe the kassi. The margalit is tannish. The kassi is chorionic. The elijah disrobe the margalit. If something is tannish then it burden the valaria. If something burden the valaria then it burden the elijah. The margalit does not need the elijah.", "logic": "\nDisrobe(valaria, kassi)\nTannish(margalit)\nChorionic(kassi)\nDisrobe(elijah, margalit)\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Burden(x, valaria))\nforall x (Burden(x, valaria) -> Burden(x, elijah))\n\nnot Burden(margalit, elijah)\n\nTannish(margalit) and forall x (Tannish(x) -> Burden(x, valaria)) -> therefore Burden(margalit, valaria) Burden(margalit, valaria) and forall x (Burden(x, valaria) -> Burden(x, elijah)) -> therefore Burden(margalit, elijah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The cherilyn stamp the queada. The kincaid is desultory. The queada is pasty. The fons stamp the kincaid. If something is desultory then it misquote the cherilyn. If something misquote the cherilyn then it misquote the fons. The fons does not need the fons.", "logic": "\nStamp(cherilyn, queada)\nDesultory(kincaid)\nPasty(queada)\nStamp(fons, kincaid)\nforall x (Desultory(x) -> Misquote(x, cherilyn))\nforall x (Misquote(x, cherilyn) -> Misquote(x, fons))\n\nnot Misquote(fons, fons)\n\nforall x (Misquote(x, cherilyn) -> Misquote(x, fons)) <- forall x (Desultory(x) -> Misquote(x, cherilyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The cassandry befool the austine. The luther is respectful. The austine is insane. The avrom befool the luther. If something is respectful then it hearten the cassandry. If something hearten the cassandry then it hearten the avrom. The cassandry hearten the avrom.", "logic": "\nBefool(cassandry, austine)\nRespectful(luther)\nInsane(austine)\nBefool(avrom, luther)\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> Hearten(x, cassandry))\nforall x (Hearten(x, cassandry) -> Hearten(x, avrom))\n\nHearten(cassandry, avrom)\n\nforall x (Hearten(x, cassandry) -> Hearten(x, avrom)) <- forall x (Respectful(x) -> Hearten(x, cassandry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The ashish disprove the tarah. The nan is shaven. The tarah is feigned. The lia disprove the nan. If something is shaven then it nicker the ashish. If something nicker the ashish then it nicker the lia. The tarah does not need the ashish.", "logic": "\nDisprove(ashish, tarah)\nShaven(nan)\nFeigned(tarah)\nDisprove(lia, nan)\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Nicker(x, ashish))\nforall x (Nicker(x, ashish) -> Nicker(x, lia))\n\nnot Nicker(tarah, ashish)\n\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Nicker(x, ashish)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The natty hash the mavis. The jakob is validating. The mavis is boytrose. The winifield hash the jakob. If something is validating then it prerecord the natty. If something prerecord the natty then it prerecord the winifield. The winifield visits the mavis.", "logic": "\nHash(natty, mavis)\nValidating(jakob)\nBoytrose(mavis)\nHash(winifield, jakob)\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Prerecord(x, natty))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, natty) -> Prerecord(x, winifield))\n\nVisits(winifield, mavis)\n\nVisits(winifield, mavis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The basil junket the emlynne. The leeanne is brooding. The emlynne is hereditary. The dayle junket the leeanne. If something is brooding then it taste the basil. If something taste the basil then it taste the dayle. The leeanne does not need the emlynne.", "logic": "\nJunket(basil, emlynne)\nBrooding(leeanne)\nHereditary(emlynne)\nJunket(dayle, leeanne)\nforall x (Brooding(x) -> Taste(x, basil))\nforall x (Taste(x, basil) -> Taste(x, dayle))\n\nnot Taste(leeanne, emlynne)\n\nnot Taste(leeanne, emlynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "The douglass effectuate the paul. The june is overfull. The paul is cussed. The hamlen effectuate the june. If something is overfull then it prop the douglass. If something prop the douglass then it prop the hamlen. The douglass effectuate the douglass.", "logic": "\nEffectuate(douglass, paul)\nOverfull(june)\nCussed(paul)\nEffectuate(hamlen, june)\nforall x (Overfull(x) -> Prop(x, douglass))\nforall x (Prop(x, douglass) -> Prop(x, hamlen))\n\nEffectuate(douglass, douglass)\n\nEffectuate(douglass, douglass) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-601"} {"premises": "Danita is loathly. Danita is millennian. Forrest is epistolary. All neglectful things are not loathly. If Danita is bilgy and Danita is loathly then Danita is vermilion. If Danita is loathly then Danita is bilgy. Quiet, bilgy things are not neglectful. If Forrest is vermilion then Forrest is bilgy. If Forrest is not odious then Forrest is not neglectful. If something is epistolary and not bilgy then it is millennian. Quiet things are millennian. Danita is loathly.", "logic": "\nLoathly(danita)\nMillennian(danita)\nEpistolary(forrest)\nforall x (Neglectful(x) -> not Loathly(x))\nBilgy(danita) and Loathly(danita) -> Vermilion(danita)\nLoathly(danita) -> Bilgy(danita)\nforall x (Vermilion(x) and Bilgy(x) -> not Neglectful(x))\nVermilion(forrest) -> Bilgy(forrest)\nnot Odious(forrest) -> not Neglectful(forrest)\nforall x (Epistolary(x) and not Bilgy(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Vermilion(x) -> Millennian(x))\n\nLoathly(danita)\n\ntherefore Loathly(danita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Ellwood is visible. Ellwood is plumbous. Audi is buttony. All mozambican things are not visible. If Ellwood is untruthful and Ellwood is visible then Ellwood is slaked. If Ellwood is visible then Ellwood is untruthful. Quiet, untruthful things are not mozambican. If Audi is slaked then Audi is untruthful. If Audi is not arcuate then Audi is not mozambican. If something is buttony and not untruthful then it is plumbous. Quiet things are plumbous. Audi is not buttony.", "logic": "\nVisible(ellwood)\nPlumbous(ellwood)\nButtony(audi)\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> not Visible(x))\nUntruthful(ellwood) and Visible(ellwood) -> Slaked(ellwood)\nVisible(ellwood) -> Untruthful(ellwood)\nforall x (Slaked(x) and Untruthful(x) -> not Mozambican(x))\nSlaked(audi) -> Untruthful(audi)\nnot Arcuate(audi) -> not Mozambican(audi)\nforall x (Buttony(x) and not Untruthful(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Slaked(x) -> Plumbous(x))\n\nnot Buttony(audi)\n\ntherefore Buttony(audi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Iormina is pursy. Iormina is custom. Mohammed is choleraic. All undersize things are not pursy. If Iormina is noetic and Iormina is pursy then Iormina is capricious. If Iormina is pursy then Iormina is noetic. Quiet, noetic things are not undersize. If Mohammed is capricious then Mohammed is noetic. If Mohammed is not compulsory then Mohammed is not undersize. If something is choleraic and not noetic then it is custom. Quiet things are custom. Iormina is noetic.", "logic": "\nPursy(iormina)\nCustom(iormina)\nCholeraic(mohammed)\nforall x (Undersize(x) -> not Pursy(x))\nNoetic(iormina) and Pursy(iormina) -> Capricious(iormina)\nPursy(iormina) -> Noetic(iormina)\nforall x (Capricious(x) and Noetic(x) -> not Undersize(x))\nCapricious(mohammed) -> Noetic(mohammed)\nnot Compulsory(mohammed) -> not Undersize(mohammed)\nforall x (Choleraic(x) and not Noetic(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Capricious(x) -> Custom(x))\n\nNoetic(iormina)\n\nPursy(iormina) and Pursy(iormina) -> Noetic(iormina) -> therefore Noetic(iormina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Maggi is throwaway. Maggi is pure. Laurianne is nonlegal. All penetrable things are not throwaway. If Maggi is antecedent and Maggi is throwaway then Maggi is annexal. If Maggi is throwaway then Maggi is antecedent. Quiet, antecedent things are not penetrable. If Laurianne is annexal then Laurianne is antecedent. If Laurianne is not fuddled then Laurianne is not penetrable. If something is nonlegal and not antecedent then it is pure. Quiet things are pure. Maggi is not antecedent.", "logic": "\nThrowaway(maggi)\nPure(maggi)\nNonlegal(laurianne)\nforall x (Penetrable(x) -> not Throwaway(x))\nAntecedent(maggi) and Throwaway(maggi) -> Annexal(maggi)\nThrowaway(maggi) -> Antecedent(maggi)\nforall x (Annexal(x) and Antecedent(x) -> not Penetrable(x))\nAnnexal(laurianne) -> Antecedent(laurianne)\nnot Fuddled(laurianne) -> not Penetrable(laurianne)\nforall x (Nonlegal(x) and not Antecedent(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Annexal(x) -> Pure(x))\n\nnot Antecedent(maggi)\n\nThrowaway(maggi) and Throwaway(maggi) -> Antecedent(maggi) -> therefore Antecedent(maggi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Hakeem is impure. Hakeem is askew. Rasla is pyrectic. All moved things are not impure. If Hakeem is developed and Hakeem is impure then Hakeem is viricidal. If Hakeem is impure then Hakeem is developed. Quiet, developed things are not moved. If Rasla is viricidal then Rasla is developed. If Rasla is not illusive then Rasla is not moved. If something is pyrectic and not developed then it is askew. Quiet things are askew. Hakeem is viricidal.", "logic": "\nImpure(hakeem)\nAskew(hakeem)\nPyrectic(rasla)\nforall x (Moved(x) -> not Impure(x))\nDeveloped(hakeem) and Impure(hakeem) -> Viricidal(hakeem)\nImpure(hakeem) -> Developed(hakeem)\nforall x (Viricidal(x) and Developed(x) -> not Moved(x))\nViricidal(rasla) -> Developed(rasla)\nnot Illusive(rasla) -> not Moved(rasla)\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) and not Developed(x) -> Askew(x))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) -> Askew(x))\n\nViricidal(hakeem)\n\nImpure(hakeem) and Impure(hakeem) -> Developed(hakeem) -> therefore Developed(hakeem) Developed(hakeem) and Impure(hakeem) and Developed(hakeem) and Impure(hakeem) -> Viricidal(hakeem) -> therefore Viricidal(hakeem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Kalina is amino. Kalina is asthenic. Bobbie is agamous. All aminic things are not amino. If Kalina is oriental and Kalina is amino then Kalina is hibernal. If Kalina is amino then Kalina is oriental. Quiet, oriental things are not aminic. If Bobbie is hibernal then Bobbie is oriental. If Bobbie is not fumbling then Bobbie is not aminic. If something is agamous and not oriental then it is asthenic. Quiet things are asthenic. Kalina is not hibernal.", "logic": "\nAmino(kalina)\nAsthenic(kalina)\nAgamous(bobbie)\nforall x (Aminic(x) -> not Amino(x))\nOriental(kalina) and Amino(kalina) -> Hibernal(kalina)\nAmino(kalina) -> Oriental(kalina)\nforall x (Hibernal(x) and Oriental(x) -> not Aminic(x))\nHibernal(bobbie) -> Oriental(bobbie)\nnot Fumbling(bobbie) -> not Aminic(bobbie)\nforall x (Agamous(x) and not Oriental(x) -> Asthenic(x))\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Asthenic(x))\n\nnot Hibernal(kalina)\n\nAmino(kalina) and Amino(kalina) -> Oriental(kalina) -> therefore Oriental(kalina) Oriental(kalina) and Amino(kalina) and Oriental(kalina) and Amino(kalina) -> Hibernal(kalina) -> therefore Hibernal(kalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Gerrit is spanish. Gerrit is adjuratory. Alvira is agonal. All pathetic things are not spanish. If Gerrit is avenged and Gerrit is spanish then Gerrit is gelatinous. If Gerrit is spanish then Gerrit is avenged. Quiet, avenged things are not pathetic. If Alvira is gelatinous then Alvira is avenged. If Alvira is not overeager then Alvira is not pathetic. If something is agonal and not avenged then it is adjuratory. Quiet things are adjuratory. Alvira is not adjuratory.", "logic": "\nSpanish(gerrit)\nAdjuratory(gerrit)\nAgonal(alvira)\nforall x (Pathetic(x) -> not Spanish(x))\nAvenged(gerrit) and Spanish(gerrit) -> Gelatinous(gerrit)\nSpanish(gerrit) -> Avenged(gerrit)\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) and Avenged(x) -> not Pathetic(x))\nGelatinous(alvira) -> Avenged(alvira)\nnot Overeager(alvira) -> not Pathetic(alvira)\nforall x (Agonal(x) and not Avenged(x) -> Adjuratory(x))\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) -> Adjuratory(x))\n\nnot Adjuratory(alvira)\n\nforall x (Agonal(x) and not Avenged(x) -> Adjuratory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Tersina is pecuniary. Tersina is demotic. Cristie is panicled. All rooted things are not pecuniary. If Tersina is quadrate and Tersina is pecuniary then Tersina is genic. If Tersina is pecuniary then Tersina is quadrate. Quiet, quadrate things are not rooted. If Cristie is genic then Cristie is quadrate. If Cristie is not forceless then Cristie is not rooted. If something is panicled and not quadrate then it is demotic. Quiet things are demotic. Cristie is quadrate.", "logic": "\nPecuniary(tersina)\nDemotic(tersina)\nPanicled(cristie)\nforall x (Rooted(x) -> not Pecuniary(x))\nQuadrate(tersina) and Pecuniary(tersina) -> Genic(tersina)\nPecuniary(tersina) -> Quadrate(tersina)\nforall x (Genic(x) and Quadrate(x) -> not Rooted(x))\nGenic(cristie) -> Quadrate(cristie)\nnot Forceless(cristie) -> not Rooted(cristie)\nforall x (Panicled(x) and not Quadrate(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Genic(x) -> Demotic(x))\n\nQuadrate(cristie)\n\nGenic(cristie) -> Quadrate(cristie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Rutledge is disabused. Rutledge is caddish. Franciska is visaged. All under things are not disabused. If Rutledge is eleven and Rutledge is disabused then Rutledge is stunted. If Rutledge is disabused then Rutledge is eleven. Quiet, eleven things are not under. If Franciska is stunted then Franciska is eleven. If Franciska is not saxicoline then Franciska is not under. If something is visaged and not eleven then it is caddish. Quiet things are caddish. Rutledge is not saxicoline.", "logic": "\nDisabused(rutledge)\nCaddish(rutledge)\nVisaged(franciska)\nforall x (Under(x) -> not Disabused(x))\nEleven(rutledge) and Disabused(rutledge) -> Stunted(rutledge)\nDisabused(rutledge) -> Eleven(rutledge)\nforall x (Stunted(x) and Eleven(x) -> not Under(x))\nStunted(franciska) -> Eleven(franciska)\nnot Saxicoline(franciska) -> not Under(franciska)\nforall x (Visaged(x) and not Eleven(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Stunted(x) -> Caddish(x))\n\nnot Saxicoline(rutledge)\n\nnot Saxicoline(rutledge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Cassey is dismantled. Cassey is matey. Lilyan is disliked. All afrikaner things are not dismantled. If Cassey is strep and Cassey is dismantled then Cassey is unforceful. If Cassey is dismantled then Cassey is strep. Quiet, strep things are not afrikaner. If Lilyan is unforceful then Lilyan is strep. If Lilyan is not validatory then Lilyan is not afrikaner. If something is disliked and not strep then it is matey. Quiet things are matey. Cassey is disliked.", "logic": "\nDismantled(cassey)\nMatey(cassey)\nDisliked(lilyan)\nforall x (Afrikaner(x) -> not Dismantled(x))\nStrep(cassey) and Dismantled(cassey) -> Unforceful(cassey)\nDismantled(cassey) -> Strep(cassey)\nforall x (Unforceful(x) and Strep(x) -> not Afrikaner(x))\nUnforceful(lilyan) -> Strep(lilyan)\nnot Validatory(lilyan) -> not Afrikaner(lilyan)\nforall x (Disliked(x) and not Strep(x) -> Matey(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) -> Matey(x))\n\nDisliked(cassey)\n\nDisliked(cassey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Wendy is base. Wendy is logistic. Gino is inimical. All priggish things are not base. If Wendy is murdered and Wendy is base then Wendy is talkative. If Wendy is base then Wendy is murdered. Quiet, murdered things are not priggish. If Gino is talkative then Gino is murdered. If Gino is not riming then Gino is not priggish. If something is inimical and not murdered then it is logistic. Quiet things are logistic. Gino is not base.", "logic": "\nBase(wendy)\nLogistic(wendy)\nInimical(gino)\nforall x (Priggish(x) -> not Base(x))\nMurdered(wendy) and Base(wendy) -> Talkative(wendy)\nBase(wendy) -> Murdered(wendy)\nforall x (Talkative(x) and Murdered(x) -> not Priggish(x))\nTalkative(gino) -> Murdered(gino)\nnot Riming(gino) -> not Priggish(gino)\nforall x (Inimical(x) and not Murdered(x) -> Logistic(x))\nforall x (Talkative(x) -> Logistic(x))\n\nnot Base(gino)\n\nnot Base(gino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "Chip is ulterior. Chip is jarring. Menard is korean. All iambic things are not ulterior. If Chip is akin and Chip is ulterior then Chip is plumb. If Chip is ulterior then Chip is akin. Quiet, akin things are not iambic. If Menard is plumb then Menard is akin. If Menard is not torulose then Menard is not iambic. If something is korean and not akin then it is jarring. Quiet things are jarring. Menard is iambic.", "logic": "\nUlterior(chip)\nJarring(chip)\nKorean(menard)\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> not Ulterior(x))\nAkin(chip) and Ulterior(chip) -> Plumb(chip)\nUlterior(chip) -> Akin(chip)\nforall x (Plumb(x) and Akin(x) -> not Iambic(x))\nPlumb(menard) -> Akin(menard)\nnot Torulose(menard) -> not Iambic(menard)\nforall x (Korean(x) and not Akin(x) -> Jarring(x))\nforall x (Plumb(x) -> Jarring(x))\n\nIambic(menard)\n\nIambic(menard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2037"} {"premises": "The jayne hurt the florencia. The jayne is overarm. The jayne is gallant. The jayne spay the florencia. The florencia hurt the jayne. The florencia is overarm. The florencia is ongoing. The florencia is gallant. The florencia wager the jayne. The florencia spay the jayne. If something is untrue then it is ongoing. If something wager the florencia then the florencia spay the jayne. If something is center and it hurt the jayne then it is gallant. If something spay the florencia and it wager the florencia then it hurt the jayne. If the florencia wager the jayne then the jayne is untrue. If something spay the jayne and it is untrue then it hurt the florencia. The florencia is ongoing.", "logic": "\nHurt(jayne, florencia)\nOverarm(jayne)\nGallant(jayne)\nSpay(jayne, florencia)\nHurt(florencia, jayne)\nOverarm(florencia)\nOngoing(florencia)\nGallant(florencia)\nWager(florencia, jayne)\nSpay(florencia, jayne)\nforall x (Untrue(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Wager(x, florencia) -> Spay(florencia, jayne))\nforall x (Center(x) and Hurt(x, jayne) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Spay(x, florencia) and Wager(x, florencia) -> Hurt(x, jayne))\nWager(florencia, jayne) -> Untrue(jayne)\nforall x (Spay(x, jayne) and Untrue(x) -> Hurt(x, florencia))\n\nOngoing(florencia)\n\ntherefore Ongoing(florencia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The sybilla regulate the prescott. The sybilla is distant. The sybilla is grassroots. The sybilla kitten the prescott. The prescott regulate the sybilla. The prescott is distant. The prescott is grave. The prescott is grassroots. The prescott randomise the sybilla. The prescott kitten the sybilla. If something is seaward then it is grave. If something randomise the prescott then the prescott kitten the sybilla. If something is burly and it regulate the sybilla then it is grassroots. If something kitten the prescott and it randomise the prescott then it regulate the sybilla. If the prescott randomise the sybilla then the sybilla is seaward. If something kitten the sybilla and it is seaward then it regulate the prescott. The sybilla does not eat the prescott.", "logic": "\nRegulate(sybilla, prescott)\nDistant(sybilla)\nGrassroots(sybilla)\nKitten(sybilla, prescott)\nRegulate(prescott, sybilla)\nDistant(prescott)\nGrave(prescott)\nGrassroots(prescott)\nRandomise(prescott, sybilla)\nKitten(prescott, sybilla)\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Grave(x))\nforall x (Randomise(x, prescott) -> Kitten(prescott, sybilla))\nforall x (Burly(x) and Regulate(x, sybilla) -> Grassroots(x))\nforall x (Kitten(x, prescott) and Randomise(x, prescott) -> Regulate(x, sybilla))\nRandomise(prescott, sybilla) -> Seaward(sybilla)\nforall x (Kitten(x, sybilla) and Seaward(x) -> Regulate(x, prescott))\n\nnot Regulate(sybilla, prescott)\n\ntherefore Regulate(sybilla, prescott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The valdemar backlog the ingaberg. The valdemar is svelte. The valdemar is lemony. The valdemar unchain the ingaberg. The ingaberg backlog the valdemar. The ingaberg is svelte. The ingaberg is barbarous. The ingaberg is lemony. The ingaberg chairman the valdemar. The ingaberg unchain the valdemar. If something is tamil then it is barbarous. If something chairman the ingaberg then the ingaberg unchain the valdemar. If something is chancrous and it backlog the valdemar then it is lemony. If something unchain the ingaberg and it chairman the ingaberg then it backlog the valdemar. If the ingaberg chairman the valdemar then the valdemar is tamil. If something unchain the valdemar and it is tamil then it backlog the ingaberg. The valdemar is tamil.", "logic": "\nBacklog(valdemar, ingaberg)\nSvelte(valdemar)\nLemony(valdemar)\nUnchain(valdemar, ingaberg)\nBacklog(ingaberg, valdemar)\nSvelte(ingaberg)\nBarbarous(ingaberg)\nLemony(ingaberg)\nChairman(ingaberg, valdemar)\nUnchain(ingaberg, valdemar)\nforall x (Tamil(x) -> Barbarous(x))\nforall x (Chairman(x, ingaberg) -> Unchain(ingaberg, valdemar))\nforall x (Chancrous(x) and Backlog(x, valdemar) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Unchain(x, ingaberg) and Chairman(x, ingaberg) -> Backlog(x, valdemar))\nChairman(ingaberg, valdemar) -> Tamil(valdemar)\nforall x (Unchain(x, valdemar) and Tamil(x) -> Backlog(x, ingaberg))\n\nTamil(valdemar)\n\nChairman(ingaberg, valdemar) and Chairman(ingaberg, valdemar) -> Tamil(valdemar) -> therefore Tamil(valdemar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The jobi gash the janeva. The jobi is accepted. The jobi is cryptic. The jobi immolate the janeva. The janeva gash the jobi. The janeva is accepted. The janeva is snowbound. The janeva is cryptic. The janeva belittle the jobi. The janeva immolate the jobi. If something is monoecious then it is snowbound. If something belittle the janeva then the janeva immolate the jobi. If something is jacobean and it gash the jobi then it is cryptic. If something immolate the janeva and it belittle the janeva then it gash the jobi. If the janeva belittle the jobi then the jobi is monoecious. If something immolate the jobi and it is monoecious then it gash the janeva. The jobi is not monoecious.", "logic": "\nGash(jobi, janeva)\nAccepted(jobi)\nCryptic(jobi)\nImmolate(jobi, janeva)\nGash(janeva, jobi)\nAccepted(janeva)\nSnowbound(janeva)\nCryptic(janeva)\nBelittle(janeva, jobi)\nImmolate(janeva, jobi)\nforall x (Monoecious(x) -> Snowbound(x))\nforall x (Belittle(x, janeva) -> Immolate(janeva, jobi))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) and Gash(x, jobi) -> Cryptic(x))\nforall x (Immolate(x, janeva) and Belittle(x, janeva) -> Gash(x, jobi))\nBelittle(janeva, jobi) -> Monoecious(jobi)\nforall x (Immolate(x, jobi) and Monoecious(x) -> Gash(x, janeva))\n\nnot Monoecious(jobi)\n\nBelittle(janeva, jobi) and Belittle(janeva, jobi) -> Monoecious(jobi) -> therefore Monoecious(jobi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The dick surface the keriann. The dick is sinkable. The dick is dolourous. The dick bray the keriann. The keriann surface the dick. The keriann is sinkable. The keriann is pronominal. The keriann is dolourous. The keriann boss the dick. The keriann bray the dick. If something is lacking then it is pronominal. If something boss the keriann then the keriann bray the dick. If something is lone and it surface the dick then it is dolourous. If something bray the keriann and it boss the keriann then it surface the dick. If the keriann boss the dick then the dick is lacking. If something bray the dick and it is lacking then it surface the keriann. The dick is pronominal.", "logic": "\nSurface(dick, keriann)\nSinkable(dick)\nDolourous(dick)\nBray(dick, keriann)\nSurface(keriann, dick)\nSinkable(keriann)\nPronominal(keriann)\nDolourous(keriann)\nBoss(keriann, dick)\nBray(keriann, dick)\nforall x (Lacking(x) -> Pronominal(x))\nforall x (Boss(x, keriann) -> Bray(keriann, dick))\nforall x (Lone(x) and Surface(x, dick) -> Dolourous(x))\nforall x (Bray(x, keriann) and Boss(x, keriann) -> Surface(x, dick))\nBoss(keriann, dick) -> Lacking(dick)\nforall x (Bray(x, dick) and Lacking(x) -> Surface(x, keriann))\n\nPronominal(dick)\n\nBoss(keriann, dick) and Boss(keriann, dick) -> Lacking(dick) -> therefore Lacking(dick) Lacking(dick) and forall x (Lacking(x) -> Pronominal(x)) -> therefore Pronominal(dick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The lidia esterify the deborah. The lidia is rotted. The lidia is ageing. The lidia wawl the deborah. The deborah esterify the lidia. The deborah is rotted. The deborah is loosened. The deborah is ageing. The deborah concenter the lidia. The deborah wawl the lidia. If something is guttural then it is loosened. If something concenter the deborah then the deborah wawl the lidia. If something is dismantled and it esterify the lidia then it is ageing. If something wawl the deborah and it concenter the deborah then it esterify the lidia. If the deborah concenter the lidia then the lidia is guttural. If something wawl the lidia and it is guttural then it esterify the deborah. The lidia is not loosened.", "logic": "\nEsterify(lidia, deborah)\nRotted(lidia)\nAgeing(lidia)\nWawl(lidia, deborah)\nEsterify(deborah, lidia)\nRotted(deborah)\nLoosened(deborah)\nAgeing(deborah)\nConcenter(deborah, lidia)\nWawl(deborah, lidia)\nforall x (Guttural(x) -> Loosened(x))\nforall x (Concenter(x, deborah) -> Wawl(deborah, lidia))\nforall x (Dismantled(x) and Esterify(x, lidia) -> Ageing(x))\nforall x (Wawl(x, deborah) and Concenter(x, deborah) -> Esterify(x, lidia))\nConcenter(deborah, lidia) -> Guttural(lidia)\nforall x (Wawl(x, lidia) and Guttural(x) -> Esterify(x, deborah))\n\nnot Loosened(lidia)\n\nConcenter(deborah, lidia) and Concenter(deborah, lidia) -> Guttural(lidia) -> therefore Guttural(lidia) Guttural(lidia) and forall x (Guttural(x) -> Loosened(x)) -> therefore Loosened(lidia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The aurelie iridesce the danyelle. The aurelie is pleasant. The aurelie is vapourific. The aurelie enervate the danyelle. The danyelle iridesce the aurelie. The danyelle is pleasant. The danyelle is bankrupt. The danyelle is vapourific. The danyelle bang the aurelie. The danyelle enervate the aurelie. If something is laureled then it is bankrupt. If something bang the danyelle then the danyelle enervate the aurelie. If something is turbulent and it iridesce the aurelie then it is vapourific. If something enervate the danyelle and it bang the danyelle then it iridesce the aurelie. If the danyelle bang the aurelie then the aurelie is laureled. If something enervate the aurelie and it is laureled then it iridesce the danyelle. The aurelie does not eat the aurelie.", "logic": "\nIridesce(aurelie, danyelle)\nPleasant(aurelie)\nVapourific(aurelie)\nEnervate(aurelie, danyelle)\nIridesce(danyelle, aurelie)\nPleasant(danyelle)\nBankrupt(danyelle)\nVapourific(danyelle)\nBang(danyelle, aurelie)\nEnervate(danyelle, aurelie)\nforall x (Laureled(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Bang(x, danyelle) -> Enervate(danyelle, aurelie))\nforall x (Turbulent(x) and Iridesce(x, aurelie) -> Vapourific(x))\nforall x (Enervate(x, danyelle) and Bang(x, danyelle) -> Iridesce(x, aurelie))\nBang(danyelle, aurelie) -> Laureled(aurelie)\nforall x (Enervate(x, aurelie) and Laureled(x) -> Iridesce(x, danyelle))\n\nnot Iridesce(aurelie, aurelie)\n\nforall x (Enervate(x, danyelle) and Bang(x, danyelle) -> Iridesce(x, aurelie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The trish dread the meridel. The trish is antic. The trish is diurnal. The trish delight the meridel. The meridel dread the trish. The meridel is antic. The meridel is fleeceable. The meridel is diurnal. The meridel dare the trish. The meridel delight the trish. If something is micaceous then it is fleeceable. If something dare the meridel then the meridel delight the trish. If something is continuant and it dread the trish then it is diurnal. If something delight the meridel and it dare the meridel then it dread the trish. If the meridel dare the trish then the trish is micaceous. If something delight the trish and it is micaceous then it dread the meridel. The meridel dread the meridel.", "logic": "\nDread(trish, meridel)\nAntic(trish)\nDiurnal(trish)\nDelight(trish, meridel)\nDread(meridel, trish)\nAntic(meridel)\nFleeceable(meridel)\nDiurnal(meridel)\nDare(meridel, trish)\nDelight(meridel, trish)\nforall x (Micaceous(x) -> Fleeceable(x))\nforall x (Dare(x, meridel) -> Delight(meridel, trish))\nforall x (Continuant(x) and Dread(x, trish) -> Diurnal(x))\nforall x (Delight(x, meridel) and Dare(x, meridel) -> Dread(x, trish))\nDare(meridel, trish) -> Micaceous(trish)\nforall x (Delight(x, trish) and Micaceous(x) -> Dread(x, meridel))\n\nDread(meridel, meridel)\n\nforall x (Delight(x, trish) and Micaceous(x) -> Dread(x, meridel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The rochester graduate the joice. The rochester is atrip. The rochester is carbolated. The rochester section the joice. The joice graduate the rochester. The joice is atrip. The joice is brunette. The joice is carbolated. The joice undercoat the rochester. The joice section the rochester. If something is fenestral then it is brunette. If something undercoat the joice then the joice section the rochester. If something is nazarene and it graduate the rochester then it is carbolated. If something section the joice and it undercoat the joice then it graduate the rochester. If the joice undercoat the rochester then the rochester is fenestral. If something section the rochester and it is fenestral then it graduate the joice. The joice does not need the joice.", "logic": "\nGraduate(rochester, joice)\nAtrip(rochester)\nCarbolated(rochester)\nSection(rochester, joice)\nGraduate(joice, rochester)\nAtrip(joice)\nBrunette(joice)\nCarbolated(joice)\nUndercoat(joice, rochester)\nSection(joice, rochester)\nforall x (Fenestral(x) -> Brunette(x))\nforall x (Undercoat(x, joice) -> Section(joice, rochester))\nforall x (Nazarene(x) and Graduate(x, rochester) -> Carbolated(x))\nforall x (Section(x, joice) and Undercoat(x, joice) -> Graduate(x, rochester))\nUndercoat(joice, rochester) -> Fenestral(rochester)\nforall x (Section(x, rochester) and Fenestral(x) -> Graduate(x, joice))\n\nnot Section(joice, joice)\n\nnot Section(joice, joice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The petronia blazon the kessia. The petronia is filthy. The petronia is flooded. The petronia husk the kessia. The kessia blazon the petronia. The kessia is filthy. The kessia is predictive. The kessia is flooded. The kessia syncretise the petronia. The kessia husk the petronia. If something is canine then it is predictive. If something syncretise the kessia then the kessia husk the petronia. If something is cataphatic and it blazon the petronia then it is flooded. If something husk the kessia and it syncretise the kessia then it blazon the petronia. If the kessia syncretise the petronia then the petronia is canine. If something husk the petronia and it is canine then it blazon the kessia. The kessia is cataphatic.", "logic": "\nBlazon(petronia, kessia)\nFilthy(petronia)\nFlooded(petronia)\nHusk(petronia, kessia)\nBlazon(kessia, petronia)\nFilthy(kessia)\nPredictive(kessia)\nFlooded(kessia)\nSyncretise(kessia, petronia)\nHusk(kessia, petronia)\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Predictive(x))\nforall x (Syncretise(x, kessia) -> Husk(kessia, petronia))\nforall x (Cataphatic(x) and Blazon(x, petronia) -> Flooded(x))\nforall x (Husk(x, kessia) and Syncretise(x, kessia) -> Blazon(x, petronia))\nSyncretise(kessia, petronia) -> Canine(petronia)\nforall x (Husk(x, petronia) and Canine(x) -> Blazon(x, kessia))\n\nCataphatic(kessia)\n\nCataphatic(kessia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The hermina rhapsodise the farrand. The hermina is solomonic. The hermina is bent. The hermina have the farrand. The farrand rhapsodise the hermina. The farrand is solomonic. The farrand is perfect. The farrand is bent. The farrand vault the hermina. The farrand have the hermina. If something is unlawful then it is perfect. If something vault the farrand then the farrand have the hermina. If something is primeval and it rhapsodise the hermina then it is bent. If something have the farrand and it vault the farrand then it rhapsodise the hermina. If the farrand vault the hermina then the hermina is unlawful. If something have the hermina and it is unlawful then it rhapsodise the farrand. The farrand is not unlawful.", "logic": "\nRhapsodise(hermina, farrand)\nSolomonic(hermina)\nBent(hermina)\nHave(hermina, farrand)\nRhapsodise(farrand, hermina)\nSolomonic(farrand)\nPerfect(farrand)\nBent(farrand)\nVault(farrand, hermina)\nHave(farrand, hermina)\nforall x (Unlawful(x) -> Perfect(x))\nforall x (Vault(x, farrand) -> Have(farrand, hermina))\nforall x (Primeval(x) and Rhapsodise(x, hermina) -> Bent(x))\nforall x (Have(x, farrand) and Vault(x, farrand) -> Rhapsodise(x, hermina))\nVault(farrand, hermina) -> Unlawful(hermina)\nforall x (Have(x, hermina) and Unlawful(x) -> Rhapsodise(x, farrand))\n\nnot Unlawful(farrand)\n\nnot Unlawful(farrand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "The duffie lend the rici. The duffie is lepidote. The duffie is malign. The duffie starch the rici. The rici lend the duffie. The rici is lepidote. The rici is culpable. The rici is malign. The rici backspace the duffie. The rici starch the duffie. If something is brunette then it is culpable. If something backspace the rici then the rici starch the duffie. If something is secondhand and it lend the duffie then it is malign. If something starch the rici and it backspace the rici then it lend the duffie. If the rici backspace the duffie then the duffie is brunette. If something starch the duffie and it is brunette then it lend the rici. The rici backspace the rici.", "logic": "\nLend(duffie, rici)\nLepidote(duffie)\nMalign(duffie)\nStarch(duffie, rici)\nLend(rici, duffie)\nLepidote(rici)\nCulpable(rici)\nMalign(rici)\nBackspace(rici, duffie)\nStarch(rici, duffie)\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Culpable(x))\nforall x (Backspace(x, rici) -> Starch(rici, duffie))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Lend(x, duffie) -> Malign(x))\nforall x (Starch(x, rici) and Backspace(x, rici) -> Lend(x, duffie))\nBackspace(rici, duffie) -> Brunette(duffie)\nforall x (Starch(x, duffie) and Brunette(x) -> Lend(x, rici))\n\nBackspace(rici, rici)\n\nBackspace(rici, rici) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1620"} {"premises": "Trevor is agronomic. Trevor is not undomestic. Trevor is shamanist. If someone is togolese and not undomestic then they are shamanist. If someone is togolese then they are hydroxy. Quiet, unlipped people are togolese. If someone is unlipped then they are not togolese. If someone is undomestic then they are togolese. All agronomic people are togolese. All unlipped, undomestic people are agronomic. If Trevor is undomestic then Trevor is not agronomic. Trevor is agronomic.", "logic": "\nAgronomic(trevor)\nnot Undomestic(trevor)\nShamanist(trevor)\nforall x (Togolese(x) and not Undomestic(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> Hydroxy(x))\nforall x (Shamanist(x) and Unlipped(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Unlipped(x) -> not Togolese(x))\nforall x (Undomestic(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Agronomic(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Unlipped(x) and Undomestic(x) -> Agronomic(x))\nUndomestic(trevor) -> not Agronomic(trevor)\n\nAgronomic(trevor)\n\ntherefore Agronomic(trevor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Morry is evitable. Morry is not westbound. Morry is tectonic. If someone is primed and not westbound then they are tectonic. If someone is primed then they are mandean. Quiet, colombian people are primed. If someone is colombian then they are not primed. If someone is westbound then they are primed. All evitable people are primed. All colombian, westbound people are evitable. If Morry is westbound then Morry is not evitable. Morry is not tectonic.", "logic": "\nEvitable(morry)\nnot Westbound(morry)\nTectonic(morry)\nforall x (Primed(x) and not Westbound(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Primed(x) -> Mandean(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) and Colombian(x) -> Primed(x))\nforall x (Colombian(x) -> not Primed(x))\nforall x (Westbound(x) -> Primed(x))\nforall x (Evitable(x) -> Primed(x))\nforall x (Colombian(x) and Westbound(x) -> Evitable(x))\nWestbound(morry) -> not Evitable(morry)\n\nnot Tectonic(morry)\n\ntherefore Tectonic(morry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Fortuna is nonlexical. Fortuna is not panicky. Fortuna is ampullary. If someone is duplex and not panicky then they are ampullary. If someone is duplex then they are enfeebling. Quiet, noncurrent people are duplex. If someone is noncurrent then they are not duplex. If someone is panicky then they are duplex. All nonlexical people are duplex. All noncurrent, panicky people are nonlexical. If Fortuna is panicky then Fortuna is not nonlexical. Fortuna is duplex.", "logic": "\nNonlexical(fortuna)\nnot Panicky(fortuna)\nAmpullary(fortuna)\nforall x (Duplex(x) and not Panicky(x) -> Ampullary(x))\nforall x (Duplex(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Ampullary(x) and Noncurrent(x) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) -> not Duplex(x))\nforall x (Panicky(x) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Nonlexical(x) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) and Panicky(x) -> Nonlexical(x))\nPanicky(fortuna) -> not Nonlexical(fortuna)\n\nDuplex(fortuna)\n\nNonlexical(fortuna) and forall x (Nonlexical(x) -> Duplex(x)) -> therefore Duplex(fortuna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Lauri is shirty. Lauri is not ellipsoid. Lauri is chorionic. If someone is permeating and not ellipsoid then they are chorionic. If someone is permeating then they are exergonic. Quiet, fighting people are permeating. If someone is fighting then they are not permeating. If someone is ellipsoid then they are permeating. All shirty people are permeating. All fighting, ellipsoid people are shirty. If Lauri is ellipsoid then Lauri is not shirty. Lauri is not permeating.", "logic": "\nShirty(lauri)\nnot Ellipsoid(lauri)\nChorionic(lauri)\nforall x (Permeating(x) and not Ellipsoid(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Exergonic(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) and Fighting(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) -> not Permeating(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Shirty(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) and Ellipsoid(x) -> Shirty(x))\nEllipsoid(lauri) -> not Shirty(lauri)\n\nnot Permeating(lauri)\n\nShirty(lauri) and forall x (Shirty(x) -> Permeating(x)) -> therefore Permeating(lauri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Grazia is underhand. Grazia is not touching. Grazia is amiss. If someone is ascosporic and not touching then they are amiss. If someone is ascosporic then they are wailful. Quiet, grizzly people are ascosporic. If someone is grizzly then they are not ascosporic. If someone is touching then they are ascosporic. All underhand people are ascosporic. All grizzly, touching people are underhand. If Grazia is touching then Grazia is not underhand. Grazia is wailful.", "logic": "\nUnderhand(grazia)\nnot Touching(grazia)\nAmiss(grazia)\nforall x (Ascosporic(x) and not Touching(x) -> Amiss(x))\nforall x (Ascosporic(x) -> Wailful(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) and Grizzly(x) -> Ascosporic(x))\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> not Ascosporic(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Ascosporic(x))\nforall x (Underhand(x) -> Ascosporic(x))\nforall x (Grizzly(x) and Touching(x) -> Underhand(x))\nTouching(grazia) -> not Underhand(grazia)\n\nWailful(grazia)\n\nUnderhand(grazia) and forall x (Underhand(x) -> Ascosporic(x)) -> therefore Ascosporic(grazia) Ascosporic(grazia) and forall x (Ascosporic(x) -> Wailful(x)) -> therefore Wailful(grazia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Tamera is abstruse. Tamera is not sextuple. Tamera is cocky. If someone is shamefaced and not sextuple then they are cocky. If someone is shamefaced then they are cursorial. Quiet, hygienical people are shamefaced. If someone is hygienical then they are not shamefaced. If someone is sextuple then they are shamefaced. All abstruse people are shamefaced. All hygienical, sextuple people are abstruse. If Tamera is sextuple then Tamera is not abstruse. Tamera is not cursorial.", "logic": "\nAbstruse(tamera)\nnot Sextuple(tamera)\nCocky(tamera)\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and not Sextuple(x) -> Cocky(x))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) -> Cursorial(x))\nforall x (Cocky(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Shamefaced(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) -> not Shamefaced(x))\nforall x (Sextuple(x) -> Shamefaced(x))\nforall x (Abstruse(x) -> Shamefaced(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) and Sextuple(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nSextuple(tamera) -> not Abstruse(tamera)\n\nnot Cursorial(tamera)\n\nAbstruse(tamera) and forall x (Abstruse(x) -> Shamefaced(x)) -> therefore Shamefaced(tamera) Shamefaced(tamera) and forall x (Shamefaced(x) -> Cursorial(x)) -> therefore Cursorial(tamera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Carroll is starved. Carroll is not tardy. Carroll is ritual. If someone is knowing and not tardy then they are ritual. If someone is knowing then they are tippy. Quiet, sensate people are knowing. If someone is sensate then they are not knowing. If someone is tardy then they are knowing. All starved people are knowing. All sensate, tardy people are starved. If Carroll is tardy then Carroll is not starved. Carroll is not furry.", "logic": "\nStarved(carroll)\nnot Tardy(carroll)\nRitual(carroll)\nforall x (Knowing(x) and not Tardy(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Tippy(x))\nforall x (Ritual(x) and Sensate(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Sensate(x) -> not Knowing(x))\nforall x (Tardy(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Sensate(x) and Tardy(x) -> Starved(x))\nTardy(carroll) -> not Starved(carroll)\n\nnot Furry(carroll)\n\nnot Furry(carroll) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Jasmine is over. Jasmine is not gross. Jasmine is thievish. If someone is bronchial and not gross then they are thievish. If someone is bronchial then they are memberless. Quiet, anurous people are bronchial. If someone is anurous then they are not bronchial. If someone is gross then they are bronchial. All over people are bronchial. All anurous, gross people are over. If Jasmine is gross then Jasmine is not over. Jasmine is anurous.", "logic": "\nOver(jasmine)\nnot Gross(jasmine)\nThievish(jasmine)\nforall x (Bronchial(x) and not Gross(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Memberless(x))\nforall x (Thievish(x) and Anurous(x) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Anurous(x) -> not Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Over(x) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Anurous(x) and Gross(x) -> Over(x))\nGross(jasmine) -> not Over(jasmine)\n\nAnurous(jasmine)\n\nAnurous(jasmine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-156"} {"premises": "Dulcinea is unfirm. Agathe is trabeate. Ortensia is cryptic. If someone is abbatial then they are upright. All trabeate people are abbatial. Dulcinea is unfirm.", "logic": "\nUnfirm(dulcinea)\nTrabeate(agathe)\nCryptic(ortensia)\nforall x (Abbatial(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Trabeate(x) -> Abbatial(x))\n\nUnfirm(dulcinea)\n\ntherefore Unfirm(dulcinea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Teressa is unstinted. Thibaut is truthful. Odessa is sensible. If someone is topical then they are provincial. All truthful people are topical. Thibaut is not truthful.", "logic": "\nUnstinted(teressa)\nTruthful(thibaut)\nSensible(odessa)\nforall x (Topical(x) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Truthful(x) -> Topical(x))\n\nnot Truthful(thibaut)\n\ntherefore Truthful(thibaut)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Nanon is aqueous. Marys is aerobic. Evelina is jurassic. If someone is surreal then they are burrlike. All aerobic people are surreal. Marys is surreal.", "logic": "\nAqueous(nanon)\nAerobic(marys)\nJurassic(evelina)\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Burrlike(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Surreal(x))\n\nSurreal(marys)\n\nAerobic(marys) and forall x (Aerobic(x) -> Surreal(x)) -> therefore Surreal(marys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Hanni is fervid. Anabel is underfed. Cathy is legion. If someone is triumphal then they are flowering. All underfed people are triumphal. Anabel is not triumphal.", "logic": "\nFervid(hanni)\nUnderfed(anabel)\nLegion(cathy)\nforall x (Triumphal(x) -> Flowering(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> Triumphal(x))\n\nnot Triumphal(anabel)\n\nUnderfed(anabel) and forall x (Underfed(x) -> Triumphal(x)) -> therefore Triumphal(anabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Sutton is acerate. Ethelbert is forested. Gloriane is congestive. If someone is autophytic then they are revengeful. All forested people are autophytic. Ethelbert is revengeful.", "logic": "\nAcerate(sutton)\nForested(ethelbert)\nCongestive(gloriane)\nforall x (Autophytic(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Forested(x) -> Autophytic(x))\n\nRevengeful(ethelbert)\n\nForested(ethelbert) and forall x (Forested(x) -> Autophytic(x)) -> therefore Autophytic(ethelbert) Autophytic(ethelbert) and forall x (Autophytic(x) -> Revengeful(x)) -> therefore Revengeful(ethelbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Thatch is georgian. Rodie is mislabeled. Faina is sparing. If someone is photic then they are relational. All mislabeled people are photic. Rodie is not relational.", "logic": "\nGeorgian(thatch)\nMislabeled(rodie)\nSparing(faina)\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Relational(x))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Photic(x))\n\nnot Relational(rodie)\n\nMislabeled(rodie) and forall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Photic(x)) -> therefore Photic(rodie) Photic(rodie) and forall x (Photic(x) -> Relational(x)) -> therefore Relational(rodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Melisent is contrary. Griselda is sequential. Kimberly is unstrung. If someone is impuissant then they are sissy. All sequential people are impuissant. Kimberly is not sissy.", "logic": "\nContrary(melisent)\nSequential(griselda)\nUnstrung(kimberly)\nforall x (Impuissant(x) -> Sissy(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Impuissant(x))\n\nnot Sissy(kimberly)\n\nforall x (Impuissant(x) -> Sissy(x)) <- forall x (Sequential(x) -> Impuissant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Gordan is foster. Darelle is squirting. Erinn is brisk. If someone is hurtful then they are endermatic. All squirting people are hurtful. Erinn is hurtful.", "logic": "\nFoster(gordan)\nSquirting(darelle)\nBrisk(erinn)\nforall x (Hurtful(x) -> Endermatic(x))\nforall x (Squirting(x) -> Hurtful(x))\n\nHurtful(erinn)\n\nforall x (Squirting(x) -> Hurtful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Anatollo is nonviolent. Tedmund is actinic. Leyla is overweight. If someone is seventeen then they are colossal. All actinic people are seventeen. Anatollo is not colossal.", "logic": "\nNonviolent(anatollo)\nActinic(tedmund)\nOverweight(leyla)\nforall x (Seventeen(x) -> Colossal(x))\nforall x (Actinic(x) -> Seventeen(x))\n\nnot Colossal(anatollo)\n\nforall x (Seventeen(x) -> Colossal(x)) <- forall x (Actinic(x) -> Seventeen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Melony is yuman. Martino is crazed. Florri is autacoidal. If someone is chagrined then they are unthinking. All crazed people are chagrined. Melony is autacoidal.", "logic": "\nYuman(melony)\nCrazed(martino)\nAutacoidal(florri)\nforall x (Chagrined(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Chagrined(x))\n\nAutacoidal(melony)\n\nAutacoidal(melony) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Blythe is refractive. Justina is elastic. Sissie is mouthlike. If someone is asinine then they are amusive. All elastic people are asinine. Sissie is not red.", "logic": "\nRefractive(blythe)\nElastic(justina)\nMouthlike(sissie)\nforall x (Asinine(x) -> Amusive(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Asinine(x))\n\nnot Red(sissie)\n\nnot Red(sissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Ike is adjustive. Alaa is prefab. Freeman is tethered. If someone is victimised then they are unchanging. All prefab people are victimised. Ike is white.", "logic": "\nAdjustive(ike)\nPrefab(alaa)\nTethered(freeman)\nforall x (Victimised(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Victimised(x))\n\nWhite(ike)\n\nWhite(ike) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1449"} {"premises": "Faina is short. Faina is unfocused. Faina is enthralled. Faina is not hurt. Wilber is not short. Wilber is cleanly. Wilber is not hurt. Ruthann is cleanly. Ruthann is not isomorphic. Giancarlo is short. Giancarlo is not hurt. Giancarlo is not isomorphic. If something is unfocused and not isomorphic then it is fevered. If something is isomorphic then it is not fevered. If something is short then it is fevered. If something is cleanly and not unfocused then it is fevered. All short, fevered things are enthralled. If something is hurt and fevered then it is enthralled. If Ruthann is hurt and Ruthann is unfocused then Ruthann is fevered. All isomorphic things are short. Wilber is not hurt.", "logic": "\nShort(faina)\nUnfocused(faina)\nEnthralled(faina)\nnot Hurt(faina)\nnot Short(wilber)\nCleanly(wilber)\nnot Hurt(wilber)\nCleanly(ruthann)\nnot Isomorphic(ruthann)\nShort(giancarlo)\nnot Hurt(giancarlo)\nnot Isomorphic(giancarlo)\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and not Isomorphic(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> not Fevered(x))\nforall x (Short(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Cleanly(x) and not Unfocused(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Short(x) and Fevered(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) and Fevered(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nHurt(ruthann) and Unfocused(ruthann) -> Fevered(ruthann)\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Short(x))\n\nnot Hurt(wilber)\n\ntherefore not Hurt(wilber)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Flower is invariable. Flower is tenured. Flower is appetizing. Flower is not amazed. Pate is not invariable. Pate is elongate. Pate is not amazed. Leonidas is elongate. Leonidas is not removed. Juliette is invariable. Juliette is not amazed. Juliette is not removed. If something is tenured and not removed then it is systolic. If something is removed then it is not systolic. If something is invariable then it is systolic. If something is elongate and not tenured then it is systolic. All invariable, systolic things are appetizing. If something is amazed and systolic then it is appetizing. If Leonidas is amazed and Leonidas is tenured then Leonidas is systolic. All removed things are invariable. Leonidas is not elongate.", "logic": "\nInvariable(flower)\nTenured(flower)\nAppetizing(flower)\nnot Amazed(flower)\nnot Invariable(pate)\nElongate(pate)\nnot Amazed(pate)\nElongate(leonidas)\nnot Removed(leonidas)\nInvariable(juliette)\nnot Amazed(juliette)\nnot Removed(juliette)\nforall x (Tenured(x) and not Removed(x) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Removed(x) -> not Systolic(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) and not Tenured(x) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) and Systolic(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nforall x (Amazed(x) and Systolic(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nAmazed(leonidas) and Tenured(leonidas) -> Systolic(leonidas)\nforall x (Removed(x) -> Invariable(x))\n\nnot Elongate(leonidas)\n\ntherefore Elongate(leonidas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Cameron is platyrhine. Cameron is relieved. Cameron is literate. Cameron is not preferred. Rosanna is not platyrhine. Rosanna is indiscreet. Rosanna is not preferred. Kincaid is indiscreet. Kincaid is not unready. Armond is platyrhine. Armond is not preferred. Armond is not unready. If something is relieved and not unready then it is upcurved. If something is unready then it is not upcurved. If something is platyrhine then it is upcurved. If something is indiscreet and not relieved then it is upcurved. All platyrhine, upcurved things are literate. If something is preferred and upcurved then it is literate. If Kincaid is preferred and Kincaid is relieved then Kincaid is upcurved. All unready things are platyrhine. Armond is upcurved.", "logic": "\nPlatyrhine(cameron)\nRelieved(cameron)\nLiterate(cameron)\nnot Preferred(cameron)\nnot Platyrhine(rosanna)\nIndiscreet(rosanna)\nnot Preferred(rosanna)\nIndiscreet(kincaid)\nnot Unready(kincaid)\nPlatyrhine(armond)\nnot Preferred(armond)\nnot Unready(armond)\nforall x (Relieved(x) and not Unready(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) -> not Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Platyrhine(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Indiscreet(x) and not Relieved(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Platyrhine(x) and Upcurved(x) -> Literate(x))\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Upcurved(x) -> Literate(x))\nPreferred(kincaid) and Relieved(kincaid) -> Upcurved(kincaid)\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Platyrhine(x))\n\nUpcurved(armond)\n\nPlatyrhine(armond) and forall x (Platyrhine(x) -> Upcurved(x)) -> therefore Upcurved(armond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Kettie is saporous. Kettie is mohammedan. Kettie is lopsided. Kettie is not thrombosed. Alicea is not saporous. Alicea is wobbly. Alicea is not thrombosed. Margette is wobbly. Margette is not vacillant. Vanessa is saporous. Vanessa is not thrombosed. Vanessa is not vacillant. If something is mohammedan and not vacillant then it is struggling. If something is vacillant then it is not struggling. If something is saporous then it is struggling. If something is wobbly and not mohammedan then it is struggling. All saporous, struggling things are lopsided. If something is thrombosed and struggling then it is lopsided. If Margette is thrombosed and Margette is mohammedan then Margette is struggling. All vacillant things are saporous. Kettie is not struggling.", "logic": "\nSaporous(kettie)\nMohammedan(kettie)\nLopsided(kettie)\nnot Thrombosed(kettie)\nnot Saporous(alicea)\nWobbly(alicea)\nnot Thrombosed(alicea)\nWobbly(margette)\nnot Vacillant(margette)\nSaporous(vanessa)\nnot Thrombosed(vanessa)\nnot Vacillant(vanessa)\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) and not Vacillant(x) -> Struggling(x))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> not Struggling(x))\nforall x (Saporous(x) -> Struggling(x))\nforall x (Wobbly(x) and not Mohammedan(x) -> Struggling(x))\nforall x (Saporous(x) and Struggling(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Thrombosed(x) and Struggling(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nThrombosed(margette) and Mohammedan(margette) -> Struggling(margette)\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Saporous(x))\n\nnot Struggling(kettie)\n\nSaporous(kettie) and forall x (Saporous(x) -> Struggling(x)) -> therefore Struggling(kettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Marven is untracked. Marven is yogistic. Marven is asyndetic. Marven is not isotopic. Kelly is not untracked. Kelly is endozoic. Kelly is not isotopic. Ronnie is endozoic. Ronnie is not diffuse. Frederick is untracked. Frederick is not isotopic. Frederick is not diffuse. If something is yogistic and not diffuse then it is breeched. If something is diffuse then it is not breeched. If something is untracked then it is breeched. If something is endozoic and not yogistic then it is breeched. All untracked, breeched things are asyndetic. If something is isotopic and breeched then it is asyndetic. If Ronnie is isotopic and Ronnie is yogistic then Ronnie is breeched. All diffuse things are untracked. Frederick is asyndetic.", "logic": "\nUntracked(marven)\nYogistic(marven)\nAsyndetic(marven)\nnot Isotopic(marven)\nnot Untracked(kelly)\nEndozoic(kelly)\nnot Isotopic(kelly)\nEndozoic(ronnie)\nnot Diffuse(ronnie)\nUntracked(frederick)\nnot Isotopic(frederick)\nnot Diffuse(frederick)\nforall x (Yogistic(x) and not Diffuse(x) -> Breeched(x))\nforall x (Diffuse(x) -> not Breeched(x))\nforall x (Untracked(x) -> Breeched(x))\nforall x (Endozoic(x) and not Yogistic(x) -> Breeched(x))\nforall x (Untracked(x) and Breeched(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Isotopic(x) and Breeched(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nIsotopic(ronnie) and Yogistic(ronnie) -> Breeched(ronnie)\nforall x (Diffuse(x) -> Untracked(x))\n\nAsyndetic(frederick)\n\nUntracked(frederick) and forall x (Untracked(x) -> Breeched(x)) -> therefore Breeched(frederick) Untracked(frederick) and Breeched(frederick) and forall x (Untracked(x) and Breeched(x) -> Asyndetic(x)) -> therefore Asyndetic(frederick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Ainslie is eupnoeic. Ainslie is rateable. Ainslie is soured. Ainslie is not cotyloid. Donelle is not eupnoeic. Donelle is terse. Donelle is not cotyloid. Maurene is terse. Maurene is not tenuous. Liuka is eupnoeic. Liuka is not cotyloid. Liuka is not tenuous. If something is rateable and not tenuous then it is mimetic. If something is tenuous then it is not mimetic. If something is eupnoeic then it is mimetic. If something is terse and not rateable then it is mimetic. All eupnoeic, mimetic things are soured. If something is cotyloid and mimetic then it is soured. If Maurene is cotyloid and Maurene is rateable then Maurene is mimetic. All tenuous things are eupnoeic. Liuka is not soured.", "logic": "\nEupnoeic(ainslie)\nRateable(ainslie)\nSoured(ainslie)\nnot Cotyloid(ainslie)\nnot Eupnoeic(donelle)\nTerse(donelle)\nnot Cotyloid(donelle)\nTerse(maurene)\nnot Tenuous(maurene)\nEupnoeic(liuka)\nnot Cotyloid(liuka)\nnot Tenuous(liuka)\nforall x (Rateable(x) and not Tenuous(x) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> not Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Terse(x) and not Rateable(x) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) and Mimetic(x) -> Soured(x))\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) and Mimetic(x) -> Soured(x))\nCotyloid(maurene) and Rateable(maurene) -> Mimetic(maurene)\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Eupnoeic(x))\n\nnot Soured(liuka)\n\nEupnoeic(liuka) and forall x (Eupnoeic(x) -> Mimetic(x)) -> therefore Mimetic(liuka) Eupnoeic(liuka) and Mimetic(liuka) and forall x (Eupnoeic(x) and Mimetic(x) -> Soured(x)) -> therefore Soured(liuka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Peri is copesetic. Peri is temperate. Peri is showy. Peri is not sexed. Skell is not copesetic. Skell is protean. Skell is not sexed. Shelia is protean. Shelia is not wounding. Morgan is copesetic. Morgan is not sexed. Morgan is not wounding. If something is temperate and not wounding then it is braw. If something is wounding then it is not braw. If something is copesetic then it is braw. If something is protean and not temperate then it is braw. All copesetic, braw things are showy. If something is sexed and braw then it is showy. If Shelia is sexed and Shelia is temperate then Shelia is braw. All wounding things are copesetic. Skell is not showy.", "logic": "\nCopesetic(peri)\nTemperate(peri)\nShowy(peri)\nnot Sexed(peri)\nnot Copesetic(skell)\nProtean(skell)\nnot Sexed(skell)\nProtean(shelia)\nnot Wounding(shelia)\nCopesetic(morgan)\nnot Sexed(morgan)\nnot Wounding(morgan)\nforall x (Temperate(x) and not Wounding(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Wounding(x) -> not Braw(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) and not Temperate(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and Braw(x) -> Showy(x))\nforall x (Sexed(x) and Braw(x) -> Showy(x))\nSexed(shelia) and Temperate(shelia) -> Braw(shelia)\nforall x (Wounding(x) -> Copesetic(x))\n\nnot Showy(skell)\n\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and Braw(x) -> Showy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Yvette is sniffy. Yvette is demode. Yvette is predatory. Yvette is not smug. Lucine is not sniffy. Lucine is iritic. Lucine is not smug. Everett is iritic. Everett is not semantic. Benoite is sniffy. Benoite is not smug. Benoite is not semantic. If something is demode and not semantic then it is retracted. If something is semantic then it is not retracted. If something is sniffy then it is retracted. If something is iritic and not demode then it is retracted. All sniffy, retracted things are predatory. If something is smug and retracted then it is predatory. If Everett is smug and Everett is demode then Everett is retracted. All semantic things are sniffy. Everett is sniffy.", "logic": "\nSniffy(yvette)\nDemode(yvette)\nPredatory(yvette)\nnot Smug(yvette)\nnot Sniffy(lucine)\nIritic(lucine)\nnot Smug(lucine)\nIritic(everett)\nnot Semantic(everett)\nSniffy(benoite)\nnot Smug(benoite)\nnot Semantic(benoite)\nforall x (Demode(x) and not Semantic(x) -> Retracted(x))\nforall x (Semantic(x) -> not Retracted(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Retracted(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) and not Demode(x) -> Retracted(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) and Retracted(x) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Smug(x) and Retracted(x) -> Predatory(x))\nSmug(everett) and Demode(everett) -> Retracted(everett)\nforall x (Semantic(x) -> Sniffy(x))\n\nSniffy(everett)\n\nforall x (Semantic(x) -> Sniffy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Iggie is pressed. Iggie is overbold. Iggie is diametral. Iggie is not beginning. Ingeberg is not pressed. Ingeberg is lanceolate. Ingeberg is not beginning. Quintina is lanceolate. Quintina is not resistive. Dean is pressed. Dean is not beginning. Dean is not resistive. If something is overbold and not resistive then it is surmounted. If something is resistive then it is not surmounted. If something is pressed then it is surmounted. If something is lanceolate and not overbold then it is surmounted. All pressed, surmounted things are diametral. If something is beginning and surmounted then it is diametral. If Quintina is beginning and Quintina is overbold then Quintina is surmounted. All resistive things are pressed. Quintina is not diametral.", "logic": "\nPressed(iggie)\nOverbold(iggie)\nDiametral(iggie)\nnot Beginning(iggie)\nnot Pressed(ingeberg)\nLanceolate(ingeberg)\nnot Beginning(ingeberg)\nLanceolate(quintina)\nnot Resistive(quintina)\nPressed(dean)\nnot Beginning(dean)\nnot Resistive(dean)\nforall x (Overbold(x) and not Resistive(x) -> Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Resistive(x) -> not Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) and not Overbold(x) -> Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Diametral(x))\nforall x (Beginning(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Diametral(x))\nBeginning(quintina) and Overbold(quintina) -> Surmounted(quintina)\nforall x (Resistive(x) -> Pressed(x))\n\nnot Diametral(quintina)\n\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Diametral(x)) <- forall x (Resistive(x) -> Pressed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Lilli is rubicund. Lilli is bumptious. Lilli is rightist. Lilli is not azonal. Staffard is not rubicund. Staffard is fatless. Staffard is not azonal. Emeline is fatless. Emeline is not incapable. Lorain is rubicund. Lorain is not azonal. Lorain is not incapable. If something is bumptious and not incapable then it is charcoal. If something is incapable then it is not charcoal. If something is rubicund then it is charcoal. If something is fatless and not bumptious then it is charcoal. All rubicund, charcoal things are rightist. If something is azonal and charcoal then it is rightist. If Emeline is azonal and Emeline is bumptious then Emeline is charcoal. All incapable things are rubicund. Lilli is fatless.", "logic": "\nRubicund(lilli)\nBumptious(lilli)\nRightist(lilli)\nnot Azonal(lilli)\nnot Rubicund(staffard)\nFatless(staffard)\nnot Azonal(staffard)\nFatless(emeline)\nnot Incapable(emeline)\nRubicund(lorain)\nnot Azonal(lorain)\nnot Incapable(lorain)\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and not Incapable(x) -> Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> not Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) -> Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Fatless(x) and not Bumptious(x) -> Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) and Charcoal(x) -> Rightist(x))\nforall x (Azonal(x) and Charcoal(x) -> Rightist(x))\nAzonal(emeline) and Bumptious(emeline) -> Charcoal(emeline)\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Rubicund(x))\n\nFatless(lilli)\n\nFatless(lilli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Dalila is creative. Dalila is buckshee. Dalila is harrowing. Dalila is not right. Beret is not creative. Beret is cuboidal. Beret is not right. Burl is cuboidal. Burl is not interred. Darrick is creative. Darrick is not right. Darrick is not interred. If something is buckshee and not interred then it is foliaceous. If something is interred then it is not foliaceous. If something is creative then it is foliaceous. If something is cuboidal and not buckshee then it is foliaceous. All creative, foliaceous things are harrowing. If something is right and foliaceous then it is harrowing. If Burl is right and Burl is buckshee then Burl is foliaceous. All interred things are creative. Burl is not buckshee.", "logic": "\nCreative(dalila)\nBuckshee(dalila)\nHarrowing(dalila)\nnot Right(dalila)\nnot Creative(beret)\nCuboidal(beret)\nnot Right(beret)\nCuboidal(burl)\nnot Interred(burl)\nCreative(darrick)\nnot Right(darrick)\nnot Interred(darrick)\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and not Interred(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Interred(x) -> not Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) and not Buckshee(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) and Foliaceous(x) -> Harrowing(x))\nforall x (Right(x) and Foliaceous(x) -> Harrowing(x))\nRight(burl) and Buckshee(burl) -> Foliaceous(burl)\nforall x (Interred(x) -> Creative(x))\n\nnot Buckshee(burl)\n\nnot Buckshee(burl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Aurora is untempting. Aurora is lovesick. Aurora is calycine. Aurora is not lordly. Trevor is not untempting. Trevor is nitwitted. Trevor is not lordly. Elizabet is nitwitted. Elizabet is not first. Fazeel is untempting. Fazeel is not lordly. Fazeel is not first. If something is lovesick and not first then it is validated. If something is first then it is not validated. If something is untempting then it is validated. If something is nitwitted and not lovesick then it is validated. All untempting, validated things are calycine. If something is lordly and validated then it is calycine. If Elizabet is lordly and Elizabet is lovesick then Elizabet is validated. All first things are untempting. Fazeel is nitwitted.", "logic": "\nUntempting(aurora)\nLovesick(aurora)\nCalycine(aurora)\nnot Lordly(aurora)\nnot Untempting(trevor)\nNitwitted(trevor)\nnot Lordly(trevor)\nNitwitted(elizabet)\nnot First(elizabet)\nUntempting(fazeel)\nnot Lordly(fazeel)\nnot First(fazeel)\nforall x (Lovesick(x) and not First(x) -> Validated(x))\nforall x (First(x) -> not Validated(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> Validated(x))\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) and not Lovesick(x) -> Validated(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) and Validated(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) and Validated(x) -> Calycine(x))\nLordly(elizabet) and Lovesick(elizabet) -> Validated(elizabet)\nforall x (First(x) -> Untempting(x))\n\nNitwitted(fazeel)\n\nNitwitted(fazeel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "Dorolisa is not down. Dorolisa is cardinal. Dorolisa is crank. Arly is down. Arly is not crank. Davoud is plumping. Alida is not down. If something is crank and plumping then it is ascending. Big, overfond things are lowbrowed. All cardinal things are lowbrowed. All cardinal things are plumping. All cardinal, down things are not crank. If Arly is not ascending then Arly is not lowbrowed. Alida is not down.", "logic": "\nnot Down(dorolisa)\nCardinal(dorolisa)\nCrank(dorolisa)\nDown(arly)\nnot Crank(arly)\nPlumping(davoud)\nnot Down(alida)\nforall x (Crank(x) and Plumping(x) -> Ascending(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) and Overfond(x) -> Lowbrowed(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) -> Lowbrowed(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) -> Plumping(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Down(x) -> not Crank(x))\nnot Ascending(arly) -> not Lowbrowed(arly)\n\nnot Down(alida)\n\ntherefore not Down(alida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Madalena is not five. Madalena is mediate. Madalena is runaway. Karoly is five. Karoly is not runaway. Secunda is lapidary. Maddie is not five. If something is runaway and lapidary then it is foolhardy. Big, excitatory things are phosphoric. All mediate things are phosphoric. All mediate things are lapidary. All mediate, five things are not runaway. If Karoly is not foolhardy then Karoly is not phosphoric. Secunda is not lapidary.", "logic": "\nnot Five(madalena)\nMediate(madalena)\nRunaway(madalena)\nFive(karoly)\nnot Runaway(karoly)\nLapidary(secunda)\nnot Five(maddie)\nforall x (Runaway(x) and Lapidary(x) -> Foolhardy(x))\nforall x (Foolhardy(x) and Excitatory(x) -> Phosphoric(x))\nforall x (Mediate(x) -> Phosphoric(x))\nforall x (Mediate(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Mediate(x) and Five(x) -> not Runaway(x))\nnot Foolhardy(karoly) -> not Phosphoric(karoly)\n\nnot Lapidary(secunda)\n\ntherefore Lapidary(secunda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Imojean is not nazi. Imojean is earthly. Imojean is eponymic. Davy is nazi. Davy is not eponymic. Salim is absorbed. Ezechiel is not nazi. If something is eponymic and absorbed then it is eyeless. Big, spiffing things are formal. All earthly things are formal. All earthly things are absorbed. All earthly, nazi things are not eponymic. If Davy is not eyeless then Davy is not formal. Imojean is formal.", "logic": "\nnot Nazi(imojean)\nEarthly(imojean)\nEponymic(imojean)\nNazi(davy)\nnot Eponymic(davy)\nAbsorbed(salim)\nnot Nazi(ezechiel)\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and Absorbed(x) -> Eyeless(x))\nforall x (Eyeless(x) and Spiffing(x) -> Formal(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Formal(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Absorbed(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) and Nazi(x) -> not Eponymic(x))\nnot Eyeless(davy) -> not Formal(davy)\n\nFormal(imojean)\n\nEarthly(imojean) and forall x (Earthly(x) -> Formal(x)) -> therefore Formal(imojean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Ruthy is not splayfoot. Ruthy is lightsome. Ruthy is computable. Nickolas is splayfoot. Nickolas is not computable. Broderic is purifying. Bennie is not splayfoot. If something is computable and purifying then it is tiring. Big, uneven things are illusional. All lightsome things are illusional. All lightsome things are purifying. All lightsome, splayfoot things are not computable. If Nickolas is not tiring then Nickolas is not illusional. Ruthy is not purifying.", "logic": "\nnot Splayfoot(ruthy)\nLightsome(ruthy)\nComputable(ruthy)\nSplayfoot(nickolas)\nnot Computable(nickolas)\nPurifying(broderic)\nnot Splayfoot(bennie)\nforall x (Computable(x) and Purifying(x) -> Tiring(x))\nforall x (Tiring(x) and Uneven(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) -> Purifying(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) and Splayfoot(x) -> not Computable(x))\nnot Tiring(nickolas) -> not Illusional(nickolas)\n\nnot Purifying(ruthy)\n\nLightsome(ruthy) and forall x (Lightsome(x) -> Purifying(x)) -> therefore Purifying(ruthy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Sherman is not comate. Sherman is oblique. Sherman is unmined. Kristel is comate. Kristel is not unmined. Nanon is risky. Noella is not comate. If something is unmined and risky then it is sintered. Big, dislocated things are tautologic. All oblique things are tautologic. All oblique things are risky. All oblique, comate things are not unmined. If Kristel is not sintered then Kristel is not tautologic. Sherman is sintered.", "logic": "\nnot Comate(sherman)\nOblique(sherman)\nUnmined(sherman)\nComate(kristel)\nnot Unmined(kristel)\nRisky(nanon)\nnot Comate(noella)\nforall x (Unmined(x) and Risky(x) -> Sintered(x))\nforall x (Sintered(x) and Dislocated(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) -> Risky(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) and Comate(x) -> not Unmined(x))\nnot Sintered(kristel) -> not Tautologic(kristel)\n\nSintered(sherman)\n\nOblique(sherman) and forall x (Oblique(x) -> Risky(x)) -> therefore Risky(sherman) Unmined(sherman) and Risky(sherman) and forall x (Unmined(x) and Risky(x) -> Sintered(x)) -> therefore Sintered(sherman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Farra is not orgiastic. Farra is patchy. Farra is sanguinary. Caty is orgiastic. Caty is not sanguinary. Sherlock is spastic. Melitta is not orgiastic. If something is sanguinary and spastic then it is diestrual. Big, disunited things are lopsided. All patchy things are lopsided. All patchy things are spastic. All patchy, orgiastic things are not sanguinary. If Caty is not diestrual then Caty is not lopsided. Farra is not diestrual.", "logic": "\nnot Orgiastic(farra)\nPatchy(farra)\nSanguinary(farra)\nOrgiastic(caty)\nnot Sanguinary(caty)\nSpastic(sherlock)\nnot Orgiastic(melitta)\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) and Spastic(x) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Diestrual(x) and Disunited(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Patchy(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Patchy(x) -> Spastic(x))\nforall x (Patchy(x) and Orgiastic(x) -> not Sanguinary(x))\nnot Diestrual(caty) -> not Lopsided(caty)\n\nnot Diestrual(farra)\n\nPatchy(farra) and forall x (Patchy(x) -> Spastic(x)) -> therefore Spastic(farra) Sanguinary(farra) and Spastic(farra) and forall x (Sanguinary(x) and Spastic(x) -> Diestrual(x)) -> therefore Diestrual(farra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Kariotta is not unrevised. Kariotta is hardline. Kariotta is bicameral. Veronique is unrevised. Veronique is not bicameral. Elyssa is ungrateful. Jamima is not unrevised. If something is bicameral and ungrateful then it is irresolute. Big, overladen things are swart. All hardline things are swart. All hardline things are ungrateful. All hardline, unrevised things are not bicameral. If Veronique is not irresolute then Veronique is not swart. Elyssa is not irresolute.", "logic": "\nnot Unrevised(kariotta)\nHardline(kariotta)\nBicameral(kariotta)\nUnrevised(veronique)\nnot Bicameral(veronique)\nUngrateful(elyssa)\nnot Unrevised(jamima)\nforall x (Bicameral(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> Irresolute(x))\nforall x (Irresolute(x) and Overladen(x) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Hardline(x) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Hardline(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (Hardline(x) and Unrevised(x) -> not Bicameral(x))\nnot Irresolute(veronique) -> not Swart(veronique)\n\nnot Irresolute(elyssa)\n\nforall x (Bicameral(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> Irresolute(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Dorita is not myeloid. Dorita is exorbitant. Dorita is batwing. Yoshi is myeloid. Yoshi is not batwing. Dorcas is delicate. Weber is not myeloid. If something is batwing and delicate then it is solo. Big, audile things are cogitable. All exorbitant things are cogitable. All exorbitant things are delicate. All exorbitant, myeloid things are not batwing. If Yoshi is not solo then Yoshi is not cogitable. Dorcas is cogitable.", "logic": "\nnot Myeloid(dorita)\nExorbitant(dorita)\nBatwing(dorita)\nMyeloid(yoshi)\nnot Batwing(yoshi)\nDelicate(dorcas)\nnot Myeloid(weber)\nforall x (Batwing(x) and Delicate(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Solo(x) and Audile(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) and Myeloid(x) -> not Batwing(x))\nnot Solo(yoshi) -> not Cogitable(yoshi)\n\nCogitable(dorcas)\n\nforall x (Solo(x) and Audile(x) -> Cogitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Bubba is not veiled. Bubba is further. Bubba is pectinate. Tucky is veiled. Tucky is not pectinate. Colin is nutritious. Diann is not veiled. If something is pectinate and nutritious then it is many. Big, pallid things are cybernetic. All further things are cybernetic. All further things are nutritious. All further, veiled things are not pectinate. If Tucky is not many then Tucky is not cybernetic. Diann is not many.", "logic": "\nnot Veiled(bubba)\nFurther(bubba)\nPectinate(bubba)\nVeiled(tucky)\nnot Pectinate(tucky)\nNutritious(colin)\nnot Veiled(diann)\nforall x (Pectinate(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Many(x))\nforall x (Many(x) and Pallid(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Further(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Further(x) -> Nutritious(x))\nforall x (Further(x) and Veiled(x) -> not Pectinate(x))\nnot Many(tucky) -> not Cybernetic(tucky)\n\nnot Many(diann)\n\nforall x (Pectinate(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Many(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Emilio is not chimerical. Emilio is respected. Emilio is brutal. Yoshi is chimerical. Yoshi is not brutal. Lida is xerophytic. Tobey is not chimerical. If something is brutal and xerophytic then it is preserved. Big, undogmatic things are alight. All respected things are alight. All respected things are xerophytic. All respected, chimerical things are not brutal. If Yoshi is not preserved then Yoshi is not alight. Emilio is undogmatic.", "logic": "\nnot Chimerical(emilio)\nRespected(emilio)\nBrutal(emilio)\nChimerical(yoshi)\nnot Brutal(yoshi)\nXerophytic(lida)\nnot Chimerical(tobey)\nforall x (Brutal(x) and Xerophytic(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and Undogmatic(x) -> Alight(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Alight(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Xerophytic(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) and Chimerical(x) -> not Brutal(x))\nnot Preserved(yoshi) -> not Alight(yoshi)\n\nUndogmatic(emilio)\n\nUndogmatic(emilio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Kiele is not hierarchic. Kiele is cuddlesome. Kiele is scrub. Opalina is hierarchic. Opalina is not scrub. Yule is pressing. Corrianne is not hierarchic. If something is scrub and pressing then it is appositive. Big, ascensive things are skeptical. All cuddlesome things are skeptical. All cuddlesome things are pressing. All cuddlesome, hierarchic things are not scrub. If Opalina is not appositive then Opalina is not skeptical. Yule is not hierarchic.", "logic": "\nnot Hierarchic(kiele)\nCuddlesome(kiele)\nScrub(kiele)\nHierarchic(opalina)\nnot Scrub(opalina)\nPressing(yule)\nnot Hierarchic(corrianne)\nforall x (Scrub(x) and Pressing(x) -> Appositive(x))\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Ascensive(x) -> Skeptical(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Skeptical(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Pressing(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> not Scrub(x))\nnot Appositive(opalina) -> not Skeptical(opalina)\n\nnot Hierarchic(yule)\n\nnot Hierarchic(yule) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "Merrill is not unangry. Merrill is ultimo. Merrill is familiar. Brittany is unangry. Brittany is not familiar. Elnore is aneurysmal. Granville is not unangry. If something is familiar and aneurysmal then it is concrete. Big, recreant things are offending. All ultimo things are offending. All ultimo things are aneurysmal. All ultimo, unangry things are not familiar. If Brittany is not concrete then Brittany is not offending. Brittany is recreant.", "logic": "\nnot Unangry(merrill)\nUltimo(merrill)\nFamiliar(merrill)\nUnangry(brittany)\nnot Familiar(brittany)\nAneurysmal(elnore)\nnot Unangry(granville)\nforall x (Familiar(x) and Aneurysmal(x) -> Concrete(x))\nforall x (Concrete(x) and Recreant(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Ultimo(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Ultimo(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Ultimo(x) and Unangry(x) -> not Familiar(x))\nnot Concrete(brittany) -> not Offending(brittany)\n\nRecreant(brittany)\n\nRecreant(brittany) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1295"} {"premises": "The jillie birr the emma. The jillie is sanguinary. The jillie is fleeting. The jillie is foolproof. The jillie is septicemic. The jillie is immiscible. The jillie abduce the emma. The jillie subtend the emma. The emma birr the jillie. The emma is sanguinary. The emma is fleeting. The emma is not foolproof. The emma is septicemic. The emma is not immiscible. The emma abduce the jillie. The emma subtend the jillie. If something is foolproof and it abduce the emma then the emma abduce the jillie. If something subtend the jillie then it abduce the emma. If something is septicemic and it abduce the emma then it subtend the emma. The emma is septicemic.", "logic": "\nBirr(jillie, emma)\nSanguinary(jillie)\nFleeting(jillie)\nFoolproof(jillie)\nSepticemic(jillie)\nImmiscible(jillie)\nAbduce(jillie, emma)\nSubtend(jillie, emma)\nBirr(emma, jillie)\nSanguinary(emma)\nFleeting(emma)\nnot Foolproof(emma)\nSepticemic(emma)\nnot Immiscible(emma)\nAbduce(emma, jillie)\nSubtend(emma, jillie)\nforall x (Foolproof(x) and Abduce(x, emma) -> Abduce(emma, jillie))\nforall x (Subtend(x, jillie) -> Abduce(x, emma))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) and Abduce(x, emma) -> Subtend(x, emma))\n\nSepticemic(emma)\n\ntherefore Septicemic(emma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The charlotte disunify the bette. The charlotte is disposed. The charlotte is recusant. The charlotte is snuffly. The charlotte is courteous. The charlotte is inheriting. The charlotte shut the bette. The charlotte obsess the bette. The bette disunify the charlotte. The bette is disposed. The bette is recusant. The bette is not snuffly. The bette is courteous. The bette is not inheriting. The bette shut the charlotte. The bette obsess the charlotte. If something is snuffly and it shut the bette then the bette shut the charlotte. If something obsess the charlotte then it shut the bette. If something is courteous and it shut the bette then it obsess the bette. The bette does not eat the charlotte.", "logic": "\nDisunify(charlotte, bette)\nDisposed(charlotte)\nRecusant(charlotte)\nSnuffly(charlotte)\nCourteous(charlotte)\nInheriting(charlotte)\nShut(charlotte, bette)\nObsess(charlotte, bette)\nDisunify(bette, charlotte)\nDisposed(bette)\nRecusant(bette)\nnot Snuffly(bette)\nCourteous(bette)\nnot Inheriting(bette)\nShut(bette, charlotte)\nObsess(bette, charlotte)\nforall x (Snuffly(x) and Shut(x, bette) -> Shut(bette, charlotte))\nforall x (Obsess(x, charlotte) -> Shut(x, bette))\nforall x (Courteous(x) and Shut(x, bette) -> Obsess(x, bette))\n\nnot Disunify(bette, charlotte)\n\ntherefore Disunify(bette, charlotte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The osbourne hoop the annalisa. The osbourne is astomatal. The osbourne is refractory. The osbourne is unglazed. The osbourne is amative. The osbourne is bantam. The osbourne quest the annalisa. The osbourne guffaw the annalisa. The annalisa hoop the osbourne. The annalisa is astomatal. The annalisa is refractory. The annalisa is not unglazed. The annalisa is amative. The annalisa is not bantam. The annalisa quest the osbourne. The annalisa guffaw the osbourne. If something is unglazed and it quest the annalisa then the annalisa quest the osbourne. If something guffaw the osbourne then it quest the annalisa. If something is amative and it quest the annalisa then it guffaw the annalisa. The annalisa quest the annalisa.", "logic": "\nHoop(osbourne, annalisa)\nAstomatal(osbourne)\nRefractory(osbourne)\nUnglazed(osbourne)\nAmative(osbourne)\nBantam(osbourne)\nQuest(osbourne, annalisa)\nGuffaw(osbourne, annalisa)\nHoop(annalisa, osbourne)\nAstomatal(annalisa)\nRefractory(annalisa)\nnot Unglazed(annalisa)\nAmative(annalisa)\nnot Bantam(annalisa)\nQuest(annalisa, osbourne)\nGuffaw(annalisa, osbourne)\nforall x (Unglazed(x) and Quest(x, annalisa) -> Quest(annalisa, osbourne))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, osbourne) -> Quest(x, annalisa))\nforall x (Amative(x) and Quest(x, annalisa) -> Guffaw(x, annalisa))\n\nQuest(annalisa, annalisa)\n\nGuffaw(annalisa, osbourne) and forall x (Guffaw(x, osbourne) -> Quest(x, annalisa)) -> therefore Quest(annalisa, annalisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The isadore abate the nancee. The isadore is plush. The isadore is corinthian. The isadore is harmonic. The isadore is popular. The isadore is known. The isadore restrain the nancee. The isadore cushion the nancee. The nancee abate the isadore. The nancee is plush. The nancee is corinthian. The nancee is not harmonic. The nancee is popular. The nancee is not known. The nancee restrain the isadore. The nancee cushion the isadore. If something is harmonic and it restrain the nancee then the nancee restrain the isadore. If something cushion the isadore then it restrain the nancee. If something is popular and it restrain the nancee then it cushion the nancee. The nancee does not like the nancee.", "logic": "\nAbate(isadore, nancee)\nPlush(isadore)\nCorinthian(isadore)\nHarmonic(isadore)\nPopular(isadore)\nKnown(isadore)\nRestrain(isadore, nancee)\nCushion(isadore, nancee)\nAbate(nancee, isadore)\nPlush(nancee)\nCorinthian(nancee)\nnot Harmonic(nancee)\nPopular(nancee)\nnot Known(nancee)\nRestrain(nancee, isadore)\nCushion(nancee, isadore)\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Restrain(x, nancee) -> Restrain(nancee, isadore))\nforall x (Cushion(x, isadore) -> Restrain(x, nancee))\nforall x (Popular(x) and Restrain(x, nancee) -> Cushion(x, nancee))\n\nnot Restrain(nancee, nancee)\n\nCushion(nancee, isadore) and forall x (Cushion(x, isadore) -> Restrain(x, nancee)) -> therefore Restrain(nancee, nancee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The fowler beacon the jermain. The fowler is monoecious. The fowler is piscine. The fowler is recorded. The fowler is unweaned. The fowler is leering. The fowler yearn the jermain. The fowler snowball the jermain. The jermain beacon the fowler. The jermain is monoecious. The jermain is piscine. The jermain is not recorded. The jermain is unweaned. The jermain is not leering. The jermain yearn the fowler. The jermain snowball the fowler. If something is recorded and it yearn the jermain then the jermain yearn the fowler. If something snowball the fowler then it yearn the jermain. If something is unweaned and it yearn the jermain then it snowball the jermain. The jermain snowball the jermain.", "logic": "\nBeacon(fowler, jermain)\nMonoecious(fowler)\nPiscine(fowler)\nRecorded(fowler)\nUnweaned(fowler)\nLeering(fowler)\nYearn(fowler, jermain)\nSnowball(fowler, jermain)\nBeacon(jermain, fowler)\nMonoecious(jermain)\nPiscine(jermain)\nnot Recorded(jermain)\nUnweaned(jermain)\nnot Leering(jermain)\nYearn(jermain, fowler)\nSnowball(jermain, fowler)\nforall x (Recorded(x) and Yearn(x, jermain) -> Yearn(jermain, fowler))\nforall x (Snowball(x, fowler) -> Yearn(x, jermain))\nforall x (Unweaned(x) and Yearn(x, jermain) -> Snowball(x, jermain))\n\nSnowball(jermain, jermain)\n\nSnowball(jermain, fowler) and forall x (Snowball(x, fowler) -> Yearn(x, jermain)) -> therefore Yearn(jermain, jermain) Unweaned(jermain) and Yearn(jermain, jermain) and forall x (Unweaned(x) and Yearn(x, jermain) -> Snowball(x, jermain)) -> therefore Snowball(jermain, jermain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The wadsworth misdo the katuscha. The wadsworth is amphibian. The wadsworth is assistant. The wadsworth is scheming. The wadsworth is electrical. The wadsworth is ergonomic. The wadsworth transition the katuscha. The wadsworth arouse the katuscha. The katuscha misdo the wadsworth. The katuscha is amphibian. The katuscha is assistant. The katuscha is not scheming. The katuscha is electrical. The katuscha is not ergonomic. The katuscha transition the wadsworth. The katuscha arouse the wadsworth. If something is scheming and it transition the katuscha then the katuscha transition the wadsworth. If something arouse the wadsworth then it transition the katuscha. If something is electrical and it transition the katuscha then it arouse the katuscha. The katuscha does not need the katuscha.", "logic": "\nMisdo(wadsworth, katuscha)\nAmphibian(wadsworth)\nAssistant(wadsworth)\nScheming(wadsworth)\nElectrical(wadsworth)\nErgonomic(wadsworth)\nTransition(wadsworth, katuscha)\nArouse(wadsworth, katuscha)\nMisdo(katuscha, wadsworth)\nAmphibian(katuscha)\nAssistant(katuscha)\nnot Scheming(katuscha)\nElectrical(katuscha)\nnot Ergonomic(katuscha)\nTransition(katuscha, wadsworth)\nArouse(katuscha, wadsworth)\nforall x (Scheming(x) and Transition(x, katuscha) -> Transition(katuscha, wadsworth))\nforall x (Arouse(x, wadsworth) -> Transition(x, katuscha))\nforall x (Electrical(x) and Transition(x, katuscha) -> Arouse(x, katuscha))\n\nnot Arouse(katuscha, katuscha)\n\nArouse(katuscha, wadsworth) and forall x (Arouse(x, wadsworth) -> Transition(x, katuscha)) -> therefore Transition(katuscha, katuscha) Electrical(katuscha) and Transition(katuscha, katuscha) and forall x (Electrical(x) and Transition(x, katuscha) -> Arouse(x, katuscha)) -> therefore Arouse(katuscha, katuscha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The gaven deaminate the bogdan. The gaven is sensitized. The gaven is motley. The gaven is pied. The gaven is blunted. The gaven is bacteremic. The gaven bream the bogdan. The gaven slave the bogdan. The bogdan deaminate the gaven. The bogdan is sensitized. The bogdan is motley. The bogdan is not pied. The bogdan is blunted. The bogdan is not bacteremic. The bogdan bream the gaven. The bogdan slave the gaven. If something is pied and it bream the bogdan then the bogdan bream the gaven. If something slave the gaven then it bream the bogdan. If something is blunted and it bream the bogdan then it slave the bogdan. The bogdan does not eat the bogdan.", "logic": "\nDeaminate(gaven, bogdan)\nSensitized(gaven)\nMotley(gaven)\nPied(gaven)\nBlunted(gaven)\nBacteremic(gaven)\nBream(gaven, bogdan)\nSlave(gaven, bogdan)\nDeaminate(bogdan, gaven)\nSensitized(bogdan)\nMotley(bogdan)\nnot Pied(bogdan)\nBlunted(bogdan)\nnot Bacteremic(bogdan)\nBream(bogdan, gaven)\nSlave(bogdan, gaven)\nforall x (Pied(x) and Bream(x, bogdan) -> Bream(bogdan, gaven))\nforall x (Slave(x, gaven) -> Bream(x, bogdan))\nforall x (Blunted(x) and Bream(x, bogdan) -> Slave(x, bogdan))\n\nnot Deaminate(bogdan, bogdan)\n\nnot Deaminate(bogdan, bogdan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The cory complexion the oneida. The cory is influent. The cory is immortal. The cory is online. The cory is staid. The cory is influent. The cory barricado the oneida. The cory think the oneida. The oneida complexion the cory. The oneida is influent. The oneida is immortal. The oneida is not online. The oneida is staid. The oneida is not influent. The oneida barricado the cory. The oneida think the cory. If something is online and it barricado the oneida then the oneida barricado the cory. If something think the cory then it barricado the oneida. If something is staid and it barricado the oneida then it think the oneida. The cory think the cory.", "logic": "\nComplexion(cory, oneida)\nInfluent(cory)\nImmortal(cory)\nOnline(cory)\nStaid(cory)\nInfluent(cory)\nBarricado(cory, oneida)\nThink(cory, oneida)\nComplexion(oneida, cory)\nInfluent(oneida)\nImmortal(oneida)\nnot Online(oneida)\nStaid(oneida)\nnot Influent(oneida)\nBarricado(oneida, cory)\nThink(oneida, cory)\nforall x (Online(x) and Barricado(x, oneida) -> Barricado(oneida, cory))\nforall x (Think(x, cory) -> Barricado(x, oneida))\nforall x (Staid(x) and Barricado(x, oneida) -> Think(x, oneida))\n\nThink(cory, cory)\n\nThink(cory, cory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The jef scaffold the avram. The jef is staple. The jef is doctorial. The jef is silky. The jef is apathetic. The jef is perplexing. The jef scud the avram. The jef pass the avram. The avram scaffold the jef. The avram is staple. The avram is doctorial. The avram is not silky. The avram is apathetic. The avram is not perplexing. The avram scud the jef. The avram pass the jef. If something is silky and it scud the avram then the avram scud the jef. If something pass the jef then it scud the avram. If something is apathetic and it scud the avram then it pass the avram. The jef does not like the jef.", "logic": "\nScaffold(jef, avram)\nStaple(jef)\nDoctorial(jef)\nSilky(jef)\nApathetic(jef)\nPerplexing(jef)\nScud(jef, avram)\nPass(jef, avram)\nScaffold(avram, jef)\nStaple(avram)\nDoctorial(avram)\nnot Silky(avram)\nApathetic(avram)\nnot Perplexing(avram)\nScud(avram, jef)\nPass(avram, jef)\nforall x (Silky(x) and Scud(x, avram) -> Scud(avram, jef))\nforall x (Pass(x, jef) -> Scud(x, avram))\nforall x (Apathetic(x) and Scud(x, avram) -> Pass(x, avram))\n\nnot Scud(jef, jef)\n\nnot Scud(jef, jef) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The terrence congee the tybie. The terrence is decorative. The terrence is encircling. The terrence is nonslip. The terrence is blueish. The terrence is perceptive. The terrence exuberate the tybie. The terrence rick the tybie. The tybie congee the terrence. The tybie is decorative. The tybie is encircling. The tybie is not nonslip. The tybie is blueish. The tybie is not perceptive. The tybie exuberate the terrence. The tybie rick the terrence. If something is nonslip and it exuberate the tybie then the tybie exuberate the terrence. If something rick the terrence then it exuberate the tybie. If something is blueish and it exuberate the tybie then it rick the tybie. The terrence congee the terrence.", "logic": "\nCongee(terrence, tybie)\nDecorative(terrence)\nEncircling(terrence)\nNonslip(terrence)\nBlueish(terrence)\nPerceptive(terrence)\nExuberate(terrence, tybie)\nRick(terrence, tybie)\nCongee(tybie, terrence)\nDecorative(tybie)\nEncircling(tybie)\nnot Nonslip(tybie)\nBlueish(tybie)\nnot Perceptive(tybie)\nExuberate(tybie, terrence)\nRick(tybie, terrence)\nforall x (Nonslip(x) and Exuberate(x, tybie) -> Exuberate(tybie, terrence))\nforall x (Rick(x, terrence) -> Exuberate(x, tybie))\nforall x (Blueish(x) and Exuberate(x, tybie) -> Rick(x, tybie))\n\nCongee(terrence, terrence)\n\nCongee(terrence, terrence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-756"} {"premises": "The adelle harbinger the parker. The adelle is burred. The adelle is tertiary. The parker harbinger the adelle. The parker is sonsie. The parker furrow the adelle. The parker furrow the hallam. The hallam harbinger the adelle. The hallam harbinger the parker. The hallam is dyed. The hallam is burred. The hallam happen the adelle. The hallam happen the parker. The hallam furrow the adelle. The hallam furrow the parker. If something happen the parker and it is sonsie then the parker harbinger the hallam. If something happen the hallam and it is defoliated then the hallam happen the adelle. If something harbinger the hallam then it happen the parker. If something harbinger the hallam and the hallam is tertiary then the hallam harbinger the adelle. If something furrow the adelle then it harbinger the hallam. If something happen the parker and the parker happen the hallam then it harbinger the adelle. The hallam happen the adelle.", "logic": "\nHarbinger(adelle, parker)\nBurred(adelle)\nTertiary(adelle)\nHarbinger(parker, adelle)\nSonsie(parker)\nFurrow(parker, adelle)\nFurrow(parker, hallam)\nHarbinger(hallam, adelle)\nHarbinger(hallam, parker)\nDyed(hallam)\nBurred(hallam)\nHappen(hallam, adelle)\nHappen(hallam, parker)\nFurrow(hallam, adelle)\nFurrow(hallam, parker)\nforall x (Happen(x, parker) and Sonsie(x) -> Harbinger(parker, hallam))\nforall x (Happen(x, hallam) and Defoliated(x) -> Happen(hallam, adelle))\nforall x (Harbinger(x, hallam) -> Happen(x, parker))\nforall x (Harbinger(x, hallam) and Tertiary(hallam) -> Harbinger(hallam, adelle))\nforall x (Furrow(x, adelle) -> Harbinger(x, hallam))\nforall x (Happen(x, parker) and Happen(parker, hallam) -> Harbinger(x, adelle))\n\nHappen(hallam, adelle)\n\ntherefore Happen(hallam, adelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The waneta heel the giovanna. The waneta is uxorious. The waneta is funguslike. The giovanna heel the waneta. The giovanna is revenant. The giovanna regrow the waneta. The giovanna regrow the pascal. The pascal heel the waneta. The pascal heel the giovanna. The pascal is pressor. The pascal is uxorious. The pascal pressurise the waneta. The pascal pressurise the giovanna. The pascal regrow the waneta. The pascal regrow the giovanna. If something pressurise the giovanna and it is revenant then the giovanna heel the pascal. If something pressurise the pascal and it is miry then the pascal pressurise the waneta. If something heel the pascal then it pressurise the giovanna. If something heel the pascal and the pascal is funguslike then the pascal heel the waneta. If something regrow the waneta then it heel the pascal. If something pressurise the giovanna and the giovanna pressurise the pascal then it heel the waneta. The pascal does not chase the waneta.", "logic": "\nHeel(waneta, giovanna)\nUxorious(waneta)\nFunguslike(waneta)\nHeel(giovanna, waneta)\nRevenant(giovanna)\nRegrow(giovanna, waneta)\nRegrow(giovanna, pascal)\nHeel(pascal, waneta)\nHeel(pascal, giovanna)\nPressor(pascal)\nUxorious(pascal)\nPressurise(pascal, waneta)\nPressurise(pascal, giovanna)\nRegrow(pascal, waneta)\nRegrow(pascal, giovanna)\nforall x (Pressurise(x, giovanna) and Revenant(x) -> Heel(giovanna, pascal))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, pascal) and Miry(x) -> Pressurise(pascal, waneta))\nforall x (Heel(x, pascal) -> Pressurise(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Heel(x, pascal) and Funguslike(pascal) -> Heel(pascal, waneta))\nforall x (Regrow(x, waneta) -> Heel(x, pascal))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, giovanna) and Pressurise(giovanna, pascal) -> Heel(x, waneta))\n\nnot Heel(pascal, waneta)\n\ntherefore Heel(pascal, waneta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The coreen fete the jessee. The coreen is inwrought. The coreen is unheated. The jessee fete the coreen. The jessee is sibilant. The jessee powder the coreen. The jessee powder the luella. The luella fete the coreen. The luella fete the jessee. The luella is halal. The luella is inwrought. The luella wank the coreen. The luella wank the jessee. The luella powder the coreen. The luella powder the jessee. If something wank the jessee and it is sibilant then the jessee fete the luella. If something wank the luella and it is thinkable then the luella wank the coreen. If something fete the luella then it wank the jessee. If something fete the luella and the luella is unheated then the luella fete the coreen. If something powder the coreen then it fete the luella. If something wank the jessee and the jessee wank the luella then it fete the coreen. The luella fete the luella.", "logic": "\nFete(coreen, jessee)\nInwrought(coreen)\nUnheated(coreen)\nFete(jessee, coreen)\nSibilant(jessee)\nPowder(jessee, coreen)\nPowder(jessee, luella)\nFete(luella, coreen)\nFete(luella, jessee)\nHalal(luella)\nInwrought(luella)\nWank(luella, coreen)\nWank(luella, jessee)\nPowder(luella, coreen)\nPowder(luella, jessee)\nforall x (Wank(x, jessee) and Sibilant(x) -> Fete(jessee, luella))\nforall x (Wank(x, luella) and Thinkable(x) -> Wank(luella, coreen))\nforall x (Fete(x, luella) -> Wank(x, jessee))\nforall x (Fete(x, luella) and Unheated(luella) -> Fete(luella, coreen))\nforall x (Powder(x, coreen) -> Fete(x, luella))\nforall x (Wank(x, jessee) and Wank(jessee, luella) -> Fete(x, coreen))\n\nFete(luella, luella)\n\nPowder(luella, coreen) and forall x (Powder(x, coreen) -> Fete(x, luella)) -> therefore Fete(luella, luella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The tessie enshrine the martica. The tessie is shambolic. The tessie is lousy. The martica enshrine the tessie. The martica is apodeictic. The martica inspan the tessie. The martica inspan the alayne. The alayne enshrine the tessie. The alayne enshrine the martica. The alayne is startled. The alayne is shambolic. The alayne essay the tessie. The alayne essay the martica. The alayne inspan the tessie. The alayne inspan the martica. If something essay the martica and it is apodeictic then the martica enshrine the alayne. If something essay the alayne and it is azimuthal then the alayne essay the tessie. If something enshrine the alayne then it essay the martica. If something enshrine the alayne and the alayne is lousy then the alayne enshrine the tessie. If something inspan the tessie then it enshrine the alayne. If something essay the martica and the martica essay the alayne then it enshrine the tessie. The martica does not chase the alayne.", "logic": "\nEnshrine(tessie, martica)\nShambolic(tessie)\nLousy(tessie)\nEnshrine(martica, tessie)\nApodeictic(martica)\nInspan(martica, tessie)\nInspan(martica, alayne)\nEnshrine(alayne, tessie)\nEnshrine(alayne, martica)\nStartled(alayne)\nShambolic(alayne)\nEssay(alayne, tessie)\nEssay(alayne, martica)\nInspan(alayne, tessie)\nInspan(alayne, martica)\nforall x (Essay(x, martica) and Apodeictic(x) -> Enshrine(martica, alayne))\nforall x (Essay(x, alayne) and Azimuthal(x) -> Essay(alayne, tessie))\nforall x (Enshrine(x, alayne) -> Essay(x, martica))\nforall x (Enshrine(x, alayne) and Lousy(alayne) -> Enshrine(alayne, tessie))\nforall x (Inspan(x, tessie) -> Enshrine(x, alayne))\nforall x (Essay(x, martica) and Essay(martica, alayne) -> Enshrine(x, tessie))\n\nnot Enshrine(martica, alayne)\n\nInspan(martica, tessie) and forall x (Inspan(x, tessie) -> Enshrine(x, alayne)) -> therefore Enshrine(martica, alayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The caressa supply the lela. The caressa is baric. The caressa is sabbatic. The lela supply the caressa. The lela is atypical. The lela quantise the caressa. The lela quantise the quentin. The quentin supply the caressa. The quentin supply the lela. The quentin is slaked. The quentin is baric. The quentin depilate the caressa. The quentin depilate the lela. The quentin quantise the caressa. The quentin quantise the lela. If something depilate the lela and it is atypical then the lela supply the quentin. If something depilate the quentin and it is ametabolic then the quentin depilate the caressa. If something supply the quentin then it depilate the lela. If something supply the quentin and the quentin is sabbatic then the quentin supply the caressa. If something quantise the caressa then it supply the quentin. If something depilate the lela and the lela depilate the quentin then it supply the caressa. The lela depilate the lela.", "logic": "\nSupply(caressa, lela)\nBaric(caressa)\nSabbatic(caressa)\nSupply(lela, caressa)\nAtypical(lela)\nQuantise(lela, caressa)\nQuantise(lela, quentin)\nSupply(quentin, caressa)\nSupply(quentin, lela)\nSlaked(quentin)\nBaric(quentin)\nDepilate(quentin, caressa)\nDepilate(quentin, lela)\nQuantise(quentin, caressa)\nQuantise(quentin, lela)\nforall x (Depilate(x, lela) and Atypical(x) -> Supply(lela, quentin))\nforall x (Depilate(x, quentin) and Ametabolic(x) -> Depilate(quentin, caressa))\nforall x (Supply(x, quentin) -> Depilate(x, lela))\nforall x (Supply(x, quentin) and Sabbatic(quentin) -> Supply(quentin, caressa))\nforall x (Quantise(x, caressa) -> Supply(x, quentin))\nforall x (Depilate(x, lela) and Depilate(lela, quentin) -> Supply(x, caressa))\n\nDepilate(lela, lela)\n\nQuantise(lela, caressa) and forall x (Quantise(x, caressa) -> Supply(x, quentin)) -> therefore Supply(lela, quentin) Supply(lela, quentin) and forall x (Supply(x, quentin) -> Depilate(x, lela)) -> therefore Depilate(lela, lela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The lovell flaunt the lonny. The lovell is ajar. The lovell is artless. The lonny flaunt the lovell. The lonny is flustered. The lonny calender the lovell. The lonny calender the kaja. The kaja flaunt the lovell. The kaja flaunt the lonny. The kaja is unsinkable. The kaja is ajar. The kaja deregulate the lovell. The kaja deregulate the lonny. The kaja calender the lovell. The kaja calender the lonny. If something deregulate the lonny and it is flustered then the lonny flaunt the kaja. If something deregulate the kaja and it is darling then the kaja deregulate the lovell. If something flaunt the kaja then it deregulate the lonny. If something flaunt the kaja and the kaja is artless then the kaja flaunt the lovell. If something calender the lovell then it flaunt the kaja. If something deregulate the lonny and the lonny deregulate the kaja then it flaunt the lovell. The lonny does not need the lonny.", "logic": "\nFlaunt(lovell, lonny)\nAjar(lovell)\nArtless(lovell)\nFlaunt(lonny, lovell)\nFlustered(lonny)\nCalender(lonny, lovell)\nCalender(lonny, kaja)\nFlaunt(kaja, lovell)\nFlaunt(kaja, lonny)\nUnsinkable(kaja)\nAjar(kaja)\nDeregulate(kaja, lovell)\nDeregulate(kaja, lonny)\nCalender(kaja, lovell)\nCalender(kaja, lonny)\nforall x (Deregulate(x, lonny) and Flustered(x) -> Flaunt(lonny, kaja))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, kaja) and Darling(x) -> Deregulate(kaja, lovell))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, kaja) -> Deregulate(x, lonny))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, kaja) and Artless(kaja) -> Flaunt(kaja, lovell))\nforall x (Calender(x, lovell) -> Flaunt(x, kaja))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, lonny) and Deregulate(lonny, kaja) -> Flaunt(x, lovell))\n\nnot Deregulate(lonny, lonny)\n\nCalender(lonny, lovell) and forall x (Calender(x, lovell) -> Flaunt(x, kaja)) -> therefore Flaunt(lonny, kaja) Flaunt(lonny, kaja) and forall x (Flaunt(x, kaja) -> Deregulate(x, lonny)) -> therefore Deregulate(lonny, lonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The sibella undershoot the minetta. The sibella is evocative. The sibella is swordlike. The minetta undershoot the sibella. The minetta is pandurate. The minetta scheme the sibella. The minetta scheme the stella. The stella undershoot the sibella. The stella undershoot the minetta. The stella is diplomatic. The stella is evocative. The stella farce the sibella. The stella farce the minetta. The stella scheme the sibella. The stella scheme the minetta. If something farce the minetta and it is pandurate then the minetta undershoot the stella. If something farce the stella and it is islamic then the stella farce the sibella. If something undershoot the stella then it farce the minetta. If something undershoot the stella and the stella is swordlike then the stella undershoot the sibella. If something scheme the sibella then it undershoot the stella. If something farce the minetta and the minetta farce the stella then it undershoot the sibella. The sibella does not chase the sibella.", "logic": "\nUndershoot(sibella, minetta)\nEvocative(sibella)\nSwordlike(sibella)\nUndershoot(minetta, sibella)\nPandurate(minetta)\nScheme(minetta, sibella)\nScheme(minetta, stella)\nUndershoot(stella, sibella)\nUndershoot(stella, minetta)\nDiplomatic(stella)\nEvocative(stella)\nFarce(stella, sibella)\nFarce(stella, minetta)\nScheme(stella, sibella)\nScheme(stella, minetta)\nforall x (Farce(x, minetta) and Pandurate(x) -> Undershoot(minetta, stella))\nforall x (Farce(x, stella) and Islamic(x) -> Farce(stella, sibella))\nforall x (Undershoot(x, stella) -> Farce(x, minetta))\nforall x (Undershoot(x, stella) and Swordlike(stella) -> Undershoot(stella, sibella))\nforall x (Scheme(x, sibella) -> Undershoot(x, stella))\nforall x (Farce(x, minetta) and Farce(minetta, stella) -> Undershoot(x, sibella))\n\nnot Undershoot(sibella, sibella)\n\nforall x (Farce(x, minetta) and Farce(minetta, stella) -> Undershoot(x, sibella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The renell consist the rubi. The renell is unstuck. The renell is flyspeck. The rubi consist the renell. The rubi is unlucky. The rubi polymerize the renell. The rubi polymerize the hamlin. The hamlin consist the renell. The hamlin consist the rubi. The hamlin is volant. The hamlin is unstuck. The hamlin tenderise the renell. The hamlin tenderise the rubi. The hamlin polymerize the renell. The hamlin polymerize the rubi. If something tenderise the rubi and it is unlucky then the rubi consist the hamlin. If something tenderise the hamlin and it is etiolate then the hamlin tenderise the renell. If something consist the hamlin then it tenderise the rubi. If something consist the hamlin and the hamlin is flyspeck then the hamlin consist the renell. If something polymerize the renell then it consist the hamlin. If something tenderise the rubi and the rubi tenderise the hamlin then it consist the renell. The renell consist the hamlin.", "logic": "\nConsist(renell, rubi)\nUnstuck(renell)\nFlyspeck(renell)\nConsist(rubi, renell)\nUnlucky(rubi)\nPolymerize(rubi, renell)\nPolymerize(rubi, hamlin)\nConsist(hamlin, renell)\nConsist(hamlin, rubi)\nVolant(hamlin)\nUnstuck(hamlin)\nTenderise(hamlin, renell)\nTenderise(hamlin, rubi)\nPolymerize(hamlin, renell)\nPolymerize(hamlin, rubi)\nforall x (Tenderise(x, rubi) and Unlucky(x) -> Consist(rubi, hamlin))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, hamlin) and Etiolate(x) -> Tenderise(hamlin, renell))\nforall x (Consist(x, hamlin) -> Tenderise(x, rubi))\nforall x (Consist(x, hamlin) and Flyspeck(hamlin) -> Consist(hamlin, renell))\nforall x (Polymerize(x, renell) -> Consist(x, hamlin))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, rubi) and Tenderise(rubi, hamlin) -> Consist(x, renell))\n\nConsist(renell, hamlin)\n\nforall x (Polymerize(x, renell) -> Consist(x, hamlin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The levi corduroy the domenico. The levi is rancorous. The levi is pomaded. The domenico corduroy the levi. The domenico is unbent. The domenico overstrain the levi. The domenico overstrain the sher. The sher corduroy the levi. The sher corduroy the domenico. The sher is gigantic. The sher is rancorous. The sher enlist the levi. The sher enlist the domenico. The sher overstrain the levi. The sher overstrain the domenico. If something enlist the domenico and it is unbent then the domenico corduroy the sher. If something enlist the sher and it is sallow then the sher enlist the levi. If something corduroy the sher then it enlist the domenico. If something corduroy the sher and the sher is pomaded then the sher corduroy the levi. If something overstrain the levi then it corduroy the sher. If something enlist the domenico and the domenico enlist the sher then it corduroy the levi. The levi does not need the domenico.", "logic": "\nCorduroy(levi, domenico)\nRancorous(levi)\nPomaded(levi)\nCorduroy(domenico, levi)\nUnbent(domenico)\nOverstrain(domenico, levi)\nOverstrain(domenico, sher)\nCorduroy(sher, levi)\nCorduroy(sher, domenico)\nGigantic(sher)\nRancorous(sher)\nEnlist(sher, levi)\nEnlist(sher, domenico)\nOverstrain(sher, levi)\nOverstrain(sher, domenico)\nforall x (Enlist(x, domenico) and Unbent(x) -> Corduroy(domenico, sher))\nforall x (Enlist(x, sher) and Sallow(x) -> Enlist(sher, levi))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, sher) -> Enlist(x, domenico))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, sher) and Pomaded(sher) -> Corduroy(sher, levi))\nforall x (Overstrain(x, levi) -> Corduroy(x, sher))\nforall x (Enlist(x, domenico) and Enlist(domenico, sher) -> Corduroy(x, levi))\n\nnot Enlist(levi, domenico)\n\nforall x (Corduroy(x, sher) -> Enlist(x, domenico)) <- forall x (Overstrain(x, levi) -> Corduroy(x, sher)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The candy boldface the debra. The candy is tenth. The candy is fairish. The debra boldface the candy. The debra is inanimate. The debra fill the candy. The debra fill the helyn. The helyn boldface the candy. The helyn boldface the debra. The helyn is warped. The helyn is tenth. The helyn blacklead the candy. The helyn blacklead the debra. The helyn fill the candy. The helyn fill the debra. If something blacklead the debra and it is inanimate then the debra boldface the helyn. If something blacklead the helyn and it is deductible then the helyn blacklead the candy. If something boldface the helyn then it blacklead the debra. If something boldface the helyn and the helyn is fairish then the helyn boldface the candy. If something fill the candy then it boldface the helyn. If something blacklead the debra and the debra blacklead the helyn then it boldface the candy. The debra is warped.", "logic": "\nBoldface(candy, debra)\nTenth(candy)\nFairish(candy)\nBoldface(debra, candy)\nInanimate(debra)\nFill(debra, candy)\nFill(debra, helyn)\nBoldface(helyn, candy)\nBoldface(helyn, debra)\nWarped(helyn)\nTenth(helyn)\nBlacklead(helyn, candy)\nBlacklead(helyn, debra)\nFill(helyn, candy)\nFill(helyn, debra)\nforall x (Blacklead(x, debra) and Inanimate(x) -> Boldface(debra, helyn))\nforall x (Blacklead(x, helyn) and Deductible(x) -> Blacklead(helyn, candy))\nforall x (Boldface(x, helyn) -> Blacklead(x, debra))\nforall x (Boldface(x, helyn) and Fairish(helyn) -> Boldface(helyn, candy))\nforall x (Fill(x, candy) -> Boldface(x, helyn))\nforall x (Blacklead(x, debra) and Blacklead(debra, helyn) -> Boldface(x, candy))\n\nWarped(debra)\n\nWarped(debra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The magda harden the enrica. The magda is sunny. The magda is affirmable. The enrica harden the magda. The enrica is ascendable. The enrica cicatrize the magda. The enrica cicatrize the parrnell. The parrnell harden the magda. The parrnell harden the enrica. The parrnell is civil. The parrnell is sunny. The parrnell roughen the magda. The parrnell roughen the enrica. The parrnell cicatrize the magda. The parrnell cicatrize the enrica. If something roughen the enrica and it is ascendable then the enrica harden the parrnell. If something roughen the parrnell and it is emarginate then the parrnell roughen the magda. If something harden the parrnell then it roughen the enrica. If something harden the parrnell and the parrnell is affirmable then the parrnell harden the magda. If something cicatrize the magda then it harden the parrnell. If something roughen the enrica and the enrica roughen the parrnell then it harden the magda. The magda is not emarginate.", "logic": "\nHarden(magda, enrica)\nSunny(magda)\nAffirmable(magda)\nHarden(enrica, magda)\nAscendable(enrica)\nCicatrize(enrica, magda)\nCicatrize(enrica, parrnell)\nHarden(parrnell, magda)\nHarden(parrnell, enrica)\nCivil(parrnell)\nSunny(parrnell)\nRoughen(parrnell, magda)\nRoughen(parrnell, enrica)\nCicatrize(parrnell, magda)\nCicatrize(parrnell, enrica)\nforall x (Roughen(x, enrica) and Ascendable(x) -> Harden(enrica, parrnell))\nforall x (Roughen(x, parrnell) and Emarginate(x) -> Roughen(parrnell, magda))\nforall x (Harden(x, parrnell) -> Roughen(x, enrica))\nforall x (Harden(x, parrnell) and Affirmable(parrnell) -> Harden(parrnell, magda))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, magda) -> Harden(x, parrnell))\nforall x (Roughen(x, enrica) and Roughen(enrica, parrnell) -> Harden(x, magda))\n\nnot Emarginate(magda)\n\nnot Emarginate(magda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "The kelila forewarn the elfrida. The kelila is dizygotic. The kelila is salt. The elfrida forewarn the kelila. The elfrida is pectic. The elfrida drudge the kelila. The elfrida drudge the tonie. The tonie forewarn the kelila. The tonie forewarn the elfrida. The tonie is dragging. The tonie is dizygotic. The tonie erode the kelila. The tonie erode the elfrida. The tonie drudge the kelila. The tonie drudge the elfrida. If something erode the elfrida and it is pectic then the elfrida forewarn the tonie. If something erode the tonie and it is otherwise then the tonie erode the kelila. If something forewarn the tonie then it erode the elfrida. If something forewarn the tonie and the tonie is salt then the tonie forewarn the kelila. If something drudge the kelila then it forewarn the tonie. If something erode the elfrida and the elfrida erode the tonie then it forewarn the kelila. The tonie erode the tonie.", "logic": "\nForewarn(kelila, elfrida)\nDizygotic(kelila)\nSalt(kelila)\nForewarn(elfrida, kelila)\nPectic(elfrida)\nDrudge(elfrida, kelila)\nDrudge(elfrida, tonie)\nForewarn(tonie, kelila)\nForewarn(tonie, elfrida)\nDragging(tonie)\nDizygotic(tonie)\nErode(tonie, kelila)\nErode(tonie, elfrida)\nDrudge(tonie, kelila)\nDrudge(tonie, elfrida)\nforall x (Erode(x, elfrida) and Pectic(x) -> Forewarn(elfrida, tonie))\nforall x (Erode(x, tonie) and Otherwise(x) -> Erode(tonie, kelila))\nforall x (Forewarn(x, tonie) -> Erode(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Forewarn(x, tonie) and Salt(tonie) -> Forewarn(tonie, kelila))\nforall x (Drudge(x, kelila) -> Forewarn(x, tonie))\nforall x (Erode(x, elfrida) and Erode(elfrida, tonie) -> Forewarn(x, kelila))\n\nErode(tonie, tonie)\n\nErode(tonie, tonie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-891"} {"premises": "Alaa is seventy. Joyann is supernal. Josi is vigilant. Ethelbert is vigilant. If someone is pyrolignic then they are supernal. Smart people are pyrolignic. Ethelbert is vigilant.", "logic": "\nSeventy(alaa)\nSupernal(joyann)\nVigilant(josi)\nVigilant(ethelbert)\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\n\nVigilant(ethelbert)\n\ntherefore Vigilant(ethelbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Joyce is bellying. Theadora is unassisted. Merl is adnexal. Russel is adnexal. If someone is indirect then they are unassisted. Smart people are indirect. Merl is not adnexal.", "logic": "\nBellying(joyce)\nUnassisted(theadora)\nAdnexal(merl)\nAdnexal(russel)\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> Unassisted(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) -> Indirect(x))\n\nnot Adnexal(merl)\n\ntherefore Adnexal(merl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Blondie is deckled. Tuesday is unfixed. Crystie is halfway. Freddy is halfway. If someone is mazed then they are unfixed. Smart people are mazed. Crystie is mazed.", "logic": "\nDeckled(blondie)\nUnfixed(tuesday)\nHalfway(crystie)\nHalfway(freddy)\nforall x (Mazed(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Halfway(x) -> Mazed(x))\n\nMazed(crystie)\n\nHalfway(crystie) and forall x (Halfway(x) -> Mazed(x)) -> therefore Mazed(crystie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Shelby is astonied. Cindelyn is maximum. Maryanna is unpitying. Charlene is unpitying. If someone is future then they are maximum. Smart people are future. Maryanna is not future.", "logic": "\nAstonied(shelby)\nMaximum(cindelyn)\nUnpitying(maryanna)\nUnpitying(charlene)\nforall x (Future(x) -> Maximum(x))\nforall x (Unpitying(x) -> Future(x))\n\nnot Future(maryanna)\n\nUnpitying(maryanna) and forall x (Unpitying(x) -> Future(x)) -> therefore Future(maryanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Chelsey is unarmored. Elizabeth is upended. Dyan is untended. Moises is untended. If someone is flighty then they are upended. Smart people are flighty. Moises is upended.", "logic": "\nUnarmored(chelsey)\nUpended(elizabeth)\nUntended(dyan)\nUntended(moises)\nforall x (Flighty(x) -> Upended(x))\nforall x (Untended(x) -> Flighty(x))\n\nUpended(moises)\n\nUntended(moises) and forall x (Untended(x) -> Flighty(x)) -> therefore Flighty(moises) Flighty(moises) and forall x (Flighty(x) -> Upended(x)) -> therefore Upended(moises)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Rolf is exegetical. Celestia is better. Cally is rhomboid. Stephanus is rhomboid. If someone is silty then they are better. Smart people are silty. Stephanus is not better.", "logic": "\nExegetical(rolf)\nBetter(celestia)\nRhomboid(cally)\nRhomboid(stephanus)\nforall x (Silty(x) -> Better(x))\nforall x (Rhomboid(x) -> Silty(x))\n\nnot Better(stephanus)\n\nRhomboid(stephanus) and forall x (Rhomboid(x) -> Silty(x)) -> therefore Silty(stephanus) Silty(stephanus) and forall x (Silty(x) -> Better(x)) -> therefore Better(stephanus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Cherin is lashing. Clarance is bighearted. Amandi is tangy. Donielle is tangy. If someone is monogenic then they are bighearted. Smart people are monogenic. Clarance is not monogenic.", "logic": "\nLashing(cherin)\nBighearted(clarance)\nTangy(amandi)\nTangy(donielle)\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> Bighearted(x))\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Monogenic(x))\n\nnot Monogenic(clarance)\n\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Monogenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Euphemia is agleam. Cherilyn is taxing. Marris is ghanian. Vonnie is ghanian. If someone is nonaged then they are taxing. Smart people are nonaged. Euphemia is taxing.", "logic": "\nAgleam(euphemia)\nTaxing(cherilyn)\nGhanian(marris)\nGhanian(vonnie)\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Taxing(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Nonaged(x))\n\nTaxing(euphemia)\n\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Taxing(x)) <- forall x (Ghanian(x) -> Nonaged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Salem is resentful. Westbrook is azotic. Arlen is damned. Carolynn is damned. If someone is curdled then they are azotic. Smart people are curdled. Salem is not curdled.", "logic": "\nResentful(salem)\nAzotic(westbrook)\nDamned(arlen)\nDamned(carolynn)\nforall x (Curdled(x) -> Azotic(x))\nforall x (Damned(x) -> Curdled(x))\n\nnot Curdled(salem)\n\nforall x (Damned(x) -> Curdled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Gabriella is hewn. Missie is staminate. Chrissie is internal. Dory is internal. If someone is lincolnian then they are staminate. Smart people are lincolnian. Gabriella is round.", "logic": "\nHewn(gabriella)\nStaminate(missie)\nInternal(chrissie)\nInternal(dory)\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Staminate(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\n\nRound(gabriella)\n\nRound(gabriella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Rafe is frayed. Anastasia is nightlong. Piggy is brazen. Ninon is brazen. If someone is drupaceous then they are nightlong. Smart people are drupaceous. Piggy is not frayed.", "logic": "\nFrayed(rafe)\nNightlong(anastasia)\nBrazen(piggy)\nBrazen(ninon)\nforall x (Drupaceous(x) -> Nightlong(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Drupaceous(x))\n\nnot Frayed(piggy)\n\nnot Frayed(piggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Evy is wily. Lowell is irrelevant. Idette is brusk. Lisbeth is brusk. If someone is unpressed then they are irrelevant. Smart people are unpressed. Idette is white.", "logic": "\nWily(evy)\nIrrelevant(lowell)\nBrusk(idette)\nBrusk(lisbeth)\nforall x (Unpressed(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\nforall x (Brusk(x) -> Unpressed(x))\n\nWhite(idette)\n\nWhite(idette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "The nissie cart the buddy. The nissie is segmental. The nissie is unmanlike. The nissie is stoppered. The nissie is protean. The nissie is xxix. The nissie hollow the buddy. The nissie cede the buddy. The buddy cart the nissie. The buddy is segmental. The buddy is stoppered. The buddy is protean. The buddy is xxix. The buddy hollow the nissie. The buddy cede the nissie. If someone cede the nissie then the nissie is xxix. If someone hollow the nissie then they chase the nissie. If the buddy cart the nissie then the nissie cede the buddy. If someone is stoppered and they need the buddy then they need the nissie. If someone hollow the nissie then the nissie cede the buddy. If someone hollow the buddy and the buddy is stoppered then the buddy cart the nissie. If someone cart the buddy then they are xxix. If someone cede the buddy then the buddy cede the nissie. The buddy cede the nissie.", "logic": "\nCart(nissie, buddy)\nSegmental(nissie)\nUnmanlike(nissie)\nStoppered(nissie)\nProtean(nissie)\nXxix(nissie)\nHollow(nissie, buddy)\nCede(nissie, buddy)\nCart(buddy, nissie)\nSegmental(buddy)\nStoppered(buddy)\nProtean(buddy)\nXxix(buddy)\nHollow(buddy, nissie)\nCede(buddy, nissie)\nforall x (Cede(x, nissie) -> Xxix(nissie))\nforall x (Hollow(x, nissie) -> Cart(x, nissie))\nCart(buddy, nissie) -> Cede(nissie, buddy)\nforall x (Stoppered(x) and Hollow(x, buddy) -> Hollow(x, nissie))\nforall x (Hollow(x, nissie) -> Cede(nissie, buddy))\nforall x (Hollow(x, buddy) and Stoppered(buddy) -> Cart(buddy, nissie))\nforall x (Cart(x, buddy) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Cede(x, buddy) -> Cede(buddy, nissie))\n\nCede(buddy, nissie)\n\ntherefore Cede(buddy, nissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The clovis attribute the cass. The clovis is suicidal. The clovis is prophetic. The clovis is tactual. The clovis is soppy. The clovis is nostalgic. The clovis ideate the cass. The clovis unlax the cass. The cass attribute the clovis. The cass is suicidal. The cass is tactual. The cass is soppy. The cass is nostalgic. The cass ideate the clovis. The cass unlax the clovis. If someone unlax the clovis then the clovis is nostalgic. If someone ideate the clovis then they chase the clovis. If the cass attribute the clovis then the clovis unlax the cass. If someone is tactual and they need the cass then they need the clovis. If someone ideate the clovis then the clovis unlax the cass. If someone ideate the cass and the cass is tactual then the cass attribute the clovis. If someone attribute the cass then they are nostalgic. If someone unlax the cass then the cass unlax the clovis. The clovis is not suicidal.", "logic": "\nAttribute(clovis, cass)\nSuicidal(clovis)\nProphetic(clovis)\nTactual(clovis)\nSoppy(clovis)\nNostalgic(clovis)\nIdeate(clovis, cass)\nUnlax(clovis, cass)\nAttribute(cass, clovis)\nSuicidal(cass)\nTactual(cass)\nSoppy(cass)\nNostalgic(cass)\nIdeate(cass, clovis)\nUnlax(cass, clovis)\nforall x (Unlax(x, clovis) -> Nostalgic(clovis))\nforall x (Ideate(x, clovis) -> Attribute(x, clovis))\nAttribute(cass, clovis) -> Unlax(clovis, cass)\nforall x (Tactual(x) and Ideate(x, cass) -> Ideate(x, clovis))\nforall x (Ideate(x, clovis) -> Unlax(clovis, cass))\nforall x (Ideate(x, cass) and Tactual(cass) -> Attribute(cass, clovis))\nforall x (Attribute(x, cass) -> Nostalgic(x))\nforall x (Unlax(x, cass) -> Unlax(cass, clovis))\n\nnot Suicidal(clovis)\n\ntherefore Suicidal(clovis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The adelaide seesaw the catherina. The adelaide is stainable. The adelaide is antemortem. The adelaide is uncanny. The adelaide is artesian. The adelaide is incident. The adelaide ache the catherina. The adelaide dialyse the catherina. The catherina seesaw the adelaide. The catherina is stainable. The catherina is uncanny. The catherina is artesian. The catherina is incident. The catherina ache the adelaide. The catherina dialyse the adelaide. If someone dialyse the adelaide then the adelaide is incident. If someone ache the adelaide then they chase the adelaide. If the catherina seesaw the adelaide then the adelaide dialyse the catherina. If someone is uncanny and they need the catherina then they need the adelaide. If someone ache the adelaide then the adelaide dialyse the catherina. If someone ache the catherina and the catherina is uncanny then the catherina seesaw the adelaide. If someone seesaw the catherina then they are incident. If someone dialyse the catherina then the catherina dialyse the adelaide. The adelaide ache the adelaide.", "logic": "\nSeesaw(adelaide, catherina)\nStainable(adelaide)\nAntemortem(adelaide)\nUncanny(adelaide)\nArtesian(adelaide)\nIncident(adelaide)\nAche(adelaide, catherina)\nDialyse(adelaide, catherina)\nSeesaw(catherina, adelaide)\nStainable(catherina)\nUncanny(catherina)\nArtesian(catherina)\nIncident(catherina)\nAche(catherina, adelaide)\nDialyse(catherina, adelaide)\nforall x (Dialyse(x, adelaide) -> Incident(adelaide))\nforall x (Ache(x, adelaide) -> Seesaw(x, adelaide))\nSeesaw(catherina, adelaide) -> Dialyse(adelaide, catherina)\nforall x (Uncanny(x) and Ache(x, catherina) -> Ache(x, adelaide))\nforall x (Ache(x, adelaide) -> Dialyse(adelaide, catherina))\nforall x (Ache(x, catherina) and Uncanny(catherina) -> Seesaw(catherina, adelaide))\nforall x (Seesaw(x, catherina) -> Incident(x))\nforall x (Dialyse(x, catherina) -> Dialyse(catherina, adelaide))\n\nAche(adelaide, adelaide)\n\nUncanny(adelaide) and Ache(adelaide, catherina) and forall x (Uncanny(x) and Ache(x, catherina) -> Ache(x, adelaide)) -> therefore Ache(adelaide, adelaide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The lib plonk the laurianne. The lib is intriguing. The lib is humanistic. The lib is bursiform. The lib is unswept. The lib is cloudlike. The lib outpace the laurianne. The lib catalyze the laurianne. The laurianne plonk the lib. The laurianne is intriguing. The laurianne is bursiform. The laurianne is unswept. The laurianne is cloudlike. The laurianne outpace the lib. The laurianne catalyze the lib. If someone catalyze the lib then the lib is cloudlike. If someone outpace the lib then they chase the lib. If the laurianne plonk the lib then the lib catalyze the laurianne. If someone is bursiform and they need the laurianne then they need the lib. If someone outpace the lib then the lib catalyze the laurianne. If someone outpace the laurianne and the laurianne is bursiform then the laurianne plonk the lib. If someone plonk the laurianne then they are cloudlike. If someone catalyze the laurianne then the laurianne catalyze the lib. The lib does not need the lib.", "logic": "\nPlonk(lib, laurianne)\nIntriguing(lib)\nHumanistic(lib)\nBursiform(lib)\nUnswept(lib)\nCloudlike(lib)\nOutpace(lib, laurianne)\nCatalyze(lib, laurianne)\nPlonk(laurianne, lib)\nIntriguing(laurianne)\nBursiform(laurianne)\nUnswept(laurianne)\nCloudlike(laurianne)\nOutpace(laurianne, lib)\nCatalyze(laurianne, lib)\nforall x (Catalyze(x, lib) -> Cloudlike(lib))\nforall x (Outpace(x, lib) -> Plonk(x, lib))\nPlonk(laurianne, lib) -> Catalyze(lib, laurianne)\nforall x (Bursiform(x) and Outpace(x, laurianne) -> Outpace(x, lib))\nforall x (Outpace(x, lib) -> Catalyze(lib, laurianne))\nforall x (Outpace(x, laurianne) and Bursiform(laurianne) -> Plonk(laurianne, lib))\nforall x (Plonk(x, laurianne) -> Cloudlike(x))\nforall x (Catalyze(x, laurianne) -> Catalyze(laurianne, lib))\n\nnot Outpace(lib, lib)\n\nBursiform(lib) and Outpace(lib, laurianne) and forall x (Bursiform(x) and Outpace(x, laurianne) -> Outpace(x, lib)) -> therefore Outpace(lib, lib)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The wendel risk the lanita. The wendel is tepid. The wendel is bicuspid. The wendel is sculpted. The wendel is imploring. The wendel is timid. The wendel misinform the lanita. The wendel crack the lanita. The lanita risk the wendel. The lanita is tepid. The lanita is sculpted. The lanita is imploring. The lanita is timid. The lanita misinform the wendel. The lanita crack the wendel. If someone crack the wendel then the wendel is timid. If someone misinform the wendel then they chase the wendel. If the lanita risk the wendel then the wendel crack the lanita. If someone is sculpted and they need the lanita then they need the wendel. If someone misinform the wendel then the wendel crack the lanita. If someone misinform the lanita and the lanita is sculpted then the lanita risk the wendel. If someone risk the lanita then they are timid. If someone crack the lanita then the lanita crack the wendel. The wendel risk the wendel.", "logic": "\nRisk(wendel, lanita)\nTepid(wendel)\nBicuspid(wendel)\nSculpted(wendel)\nImploring(wendel)\nTimid(wendel)\nMisinform(wendel, lanita)\nCrack(wendel, lanita)\nRisk(lanita, wendel)\nTepid(lanita)\nSculpted(lanita)\nImploring(lanita)\nTimid(lanita)\nMisinform(lanita, wendel)\nCrack(lanita, wendel)\nforall x (Crack(x, wendel) -> Timid(wendel))\nforall x (Misinform(x, wendel) -> Risk(x, wendel))\nRisk(lanita, wendel) -> Crack(wendel, lanita)\nforall x (Sculpted(x) and Misinform(x, lanita) -> Misinform(x, wendel))\nforall x (Misinform(x, wendel) -> Crack(wendel, lanita))\nforall x (Misinform(x, lanita) and Sculpted(lanita) -> Risk(lanita, wendel))\nforall x (Risk(x, lanita) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Crack(x, lanita) -> Crack(lanita, wendel))\n\nRisk(wendel, wendel)\n\nSculpted(wendel) and Misinform(wendel, lanita) and forall x (Sculpted(x) and Misinform(x, lanita) -> Misinform(x, wendel)) -> therefore Misinform(wendel, wendel) Misinform(wendel, wendel) and forall x (Misinform(x, wendel) -> Risk(x, wendel)) -> therefore Risk(wendel, wendel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The alf connect the shena. The alf is unsugared. The alf is strapping. The alf is aquiline. The alf is diabetic. The alf is peopled. The alf riposte the shena. The alf rule the shena. The shena connect the alf. The shena is unsugared. The shena is aquiline. The shena is diabetic. The shena is peopled. The shena riposte the alf. The shena rule the alf. If someone rule the alf then the alf is peopled. If someone riposte the alf then they chase the alf. If the shena connect the alf then the alf rule the shena. If someone is aquiline and they need the shena then they need the alf. If someone riposte the alf then the alf rule the shena. If someone riposte the shena and the shena is aquiline then the shena connect the alf. If someone connect the shena then they are peopled. If someone rule the shena then the shena rule the alf. The alf does not chase the alf.", "logic": "\nConnect(alf, shena)\nUnsugared(alf)\nStrapping(alf)\nAquiline(alf)\nDiabetic(alf)\nPeopled(alf)\nRiposte(alf, shena)\nRule(alf, shena)\nConnect(shena, alf)\nUnsugared(shena)\nAquiline(shena)\nDiabetic(shena)\nPeopled(shena)\nRiposte(shena, alf)\nRule(shena, alf)\nforall x (Rule(x, alf) -> Peopled(alf))\nforall x (Riposte(x, alf) -> Connect(x, alf))\nConnect(shena, alf) -> Rule(alf, shena)\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Riposte(x, shena) -> Riposte(x, alf))\nforall x (Riposte(x, alf) -> Rule(alf, shena))\nforall x (Riposte(x, shena) and Aquiline(shena) -> Connect(shena, alf))\nforall x (Connect(x, shena) -> Peopled(x))\nforall x (Rule(x, shena) -> Rule(shena, alf))\n\nnot Connect(alf, alf)\n\nAquiline(alf) and Riposte(alf, shena) and forall x (Aquiline(x) and Riposte(x, shena) -> Riposte(x, alf)) -> therefore Riposte(alf, alf) Riposte(alf, alf) and forall x (Riposte(x, alf) -> Connect(x, alf)) -> therefore Connect(alf, alf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The fidela sightsee the marita. The fidela is sellable. The fidela is renascent. The fidela is chafflike. The fidela is openhanded. The fidela is indebted. The fidela fetishize the marita. The fidela depose the marita. The marita sightsee the fidela. The marita is sellable. The marita is chafflike. The marita is openhanded. The marita is indebted. The marita fetishize the fidela. The marita depose the fidela. If someone depose the fidela then the fidela is indebted. If someone fetishize the fidela then they chase the fidela. If the marita sightsee the fidela then the fidela depose the marita. If someone is chafflike and they need the marita then they need the fidela. If someone fetishize the fidela then the fidela depose the marita. If someone fetishize the marita and the marita is chafflike then the marita sightsee the fidela. If someone sightsee the marita then they are indebted. If someone depose the marita then the marita depose the fidela. The marita is not renascent.", "logic": "\nSightsee(fidela, marita)\nSellable(fidela)\nRenascent(fidela)\nChafflike(fidela)\nOpenhanded(fidela)\nIndebted(fidela)\nFetishize(fidela, marita)\nDepose(fidela, marita)\nSightsee(marita, fidela)\nSellable(marita)\nChafflike(marita)\nOpenhanded(marita)\nIndebted(marita)\nFetishize(marita, fidela)\nDepose(marita, fidela)\nforall x (Depose(x, fidela) -> Indebted(fidela))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, fidela) -> Sightsee(x, fidela))\nSightsee(marita, fidela) -> Depose(fidela, marita)\nforall x (Chafflike(x) and Fetishize(x, marita) -> Fetishize(x, fidela))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, fidela) -> Depose(fidela, marita))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, marita) and Chafflike(marita) -> Sightsee(marita, fidela))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, marita) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Depose(x, marita) -> Depose(marita, fidela))\n\nnot Renascent(marita)\n\nnot Renascent(marita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The anurag outsail the julio. The anurag is coexisting. The anurag is shattering. The anurag is spectral. The anurag is prostate. The anurag is foggy. The anurag overpower the julio. The anurag prescribe the julio. The julio outsail the anurag. The julio is coexisting. The julio is spectral. The julio is prostate. The julio is foggy. The julio overpower the anurag. The julio prescribe the anurag. If someone prescribe the anurag then the anurag is foggy. If someone overpower the anurag then they chase the anurag. If the julio outsail the anurag then the anurag prescribe the julio. If someone is spectral and they need the julio then they need the anurag. If someone overpower the anurag then the anurag prescribe the julio. If someone overpower the julio and the julio is spectral then the julio outsail the anurag. If someone outsail the julio then they are foggy. If someone prescribe the julio then the julio prescribe the anurag. The anurag prescribe the anurag.", "logic": "\nOutsail(anurag, julio)\nCoexisting(anurag)\nShattering(anurag)\nSpectral(anurag)\nProstate(anurag)\nFoggy(anurag)\nOverpower(anurag, julio)\nPrescribe(anurag, julio)\nOutsail(julio, anurag)\nCoexisting(julio)\nSpectral(julio)\nProstate(julio)\nFoggy(julio)\nOverpower(julio, anurag)\nPrescribe(julio, anurag)\nforall x (Prescribe(x, anurag) -> Foggy(anurag))\nforall x (Overpower(x, anurag) -> Outsail(x, anurag))\nOutsail(julio, anurag) -> Prescribe(anurag, julio)\nforall x (Spectral(x) and Overpower(x, julio) -> Overpower(x, anurag))\nforall x (Overpower(x, anurag) -> Prescribe(anurag, julio))\nforall x (Overpower(x, julio) and Spectral(julio) -> Outsail(julio, anurag))\nforall x (Outsail(x, julio) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Prescribe(x, julio) -> Prescribe(julio, anurag))\n\nPrescribe(anurag, anurag)\n\nPrescribe(anurag, anurag) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The shara aberrate the tybie. The shara is stone. The shara is prognathic. The shara is summary. The shara is emergent. The shara is heathenish. The shara thumb the tybie. The shara sugar the tybie. The tybie aberrate the shara. The tybie is stone. The tybie is summary. The tybie is emergent. The tybie is heathenish. The tybie thumb the shara. The tybie sugar the shara. If someone sugar the shara then the shara is heathenish. If someone thumb the shara then they chase the shara. If the tybie aberrate the shara then the shara sugar the tybie. If someone is summary and they need the tybie then they need the shara. If someone thumb the shara then the shara sugar the tybie. If someone thumb the tybie and the tybie is summary then the tybie aberrate the shara. If someone aberrate the tybie then they are heathenish. If someone sugar the tybie then the tybie sugar the shara. The tybie does not need the tybie.", "logic": "\nAberrate(shara, tybie)\nStone(shara)\nPrognathic(shara)\nSummary(shara)\nEmergent(shara)\nHeathenish(shara)\nThumb(shara, tybie)\nSugar(shara, tybie)\nAberrate(tybie, shara)\nStone(tybie)\nSummary(tybie)\nEmergent(tybie)\nHeathenish(tybie)\nThumb(tybie, shara)\nSugar(tybie, shara)\nforall x (Sugar(x, shara) -> Heathenish(shara))\nforall x (Thumb(x, shara) -> Aberrate(x, shara))\nAberrate(tybie, shara) -> Sugar(shara, tybie)\nforall x (Summary(x) and Thumb(x, tybie) -> Thumb(x, shara))\nforall x (Thumb(x, shara) -> Sugar(shara, tybie))\nforall x (Thumb(x, tybie) and Summary(tybie) -> Aberrate(tybie, shara))\nforall x (Aberrate(x, tybie) -> Heathenish(x))\nforall x (Sugar(x, tybie) -> Sugar(tybie, shara))\n\nnot Thumb(tybie, tybie)\n\nnot Thumb(tybie, tybie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The federica dingdong the ana. The federica is tropical. The federica is outrigged. The federica is deliberate. The federica is retroflex. The federica is assigned. The federica assume the ana. The federica cover the ana. The ana dingdong the federica. The ana is tropical. The ana is deliberate. The ana is retroflex. The ana is assigned. The ana assume the federica. The ana cover the federica. If someone cover the federica then the federica is assigned. If someone assume the federica then they chase the federica. If the ana dingdong the federica then the federica cover the ana. If someone is deliberate and they need the ana then they need the federica. If someone assume the federica then the federica cover the ana. If someone assume the ana and the ana is deliberate then the ana dingdong the federica. If someone dingdong the ana then they are assigned. If someone cover the ana then the ana cover the federica. The ana cover the ana.", "logic": "\nDingdong(federica, ana)\nTropical(federica)\nOutrigged(federica)\nDeliberate(federica)\nRetroflex(federica)\nAssigned(federica)\nAssume(federica, ana)\nCover(federica, ana)\nDingdong(ana, federica)\nTropical(ana)\nDeliberate(ana)\nRetroflex(ana)\nAssigned(ana)\nAssume(ana, federica)\nCover(ana, federica)\nforall x (Cover(x, federica) -> Assigned(federica))\nforall x (Assume(x, federica) -> Dingdong(x, federica))\nDingdong(ana, federica) -> Cover(federica, ana)\nforall x (Deliberate(x) and Assume(x, ana) -> Assume(x, federica))\nforall x (Assume(x, federica) -> Cover(federica, ana))\nforall x (Assume(x, ana) and Deliberate(ana) -> Dingdong(ana, federica))\nforall x (Dingdong(x, ana) -> Assigned(x))\nforall x (Cover(x, ana) -> Cover(ana, federica))\n\nCover(ana, ana)\n\nCover(ana, ana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1744"} {"premises": "The myrlene is trembling. The myrlene is pacifist. The myrlene is blimpish. The myrlene rededicate the ianthe. The myrlene rededicate the othelia. The ianthe dimple the myrlene. The ianthe dimple the othelia. The ianthe detest the othelia. The ianthe rededicate the myrlene. The ianthe rededicate the othelia. The othelia is inimical. The othelia is blimpish. The othelia dimple the ianthe. The othelia detest the myrlene. The othelia rededicate the myrlene. If the myrlene detest the ianthe then the ianthe detest the myrlene. If something dimple the othelia then the othelia detest the ianthe. If something is blimpish then it detest the ianthe. The othelia rededicate the myrlene.", "logic": "\nTrembling(myrlene)\nPacifist(myrlene)\nBlimpish(myrlene)\nRededicate(myrlene, ianthe)\nRededicate(myrlene, othelia)\nDimple(ianthe, myrlene)\nDimple(ianthe, othelia)\nDetest(ianthe, othelia)\nRededicate(ianthe, myrlene)\nRededicate(ianthe, othelia)\nInimical(othelia)\nBlimpish(othelia)\nDimple(othelia, ianthe)\nDetest(othelia, myrlene)\nRededicate(othelia, myrlene)\nDetest(myrlene, ianthe) -> Detest(ianthe, myrlene)\nforall x (Dimple(x, othelia) -> Detest(othelia, ianthe))\nforall x (Blimpish(x) -> Detest(x, ianthe))\n\nRededicate(othelia, myrlene)\n\ntherefore Rededicate(othelia, myrlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The karole is milky. The karole is endoergic. The karole is eremitical. The karole alibi the drake. The karole alibi the vivianne. The drake tabularize the karole. The drake tabularize the vivianne. The drake advise the vivianne. The drake alibi the karole. The drake alibi the vivianne. The vivianne is aperient. The vivianne is eremitical. The vivianne tabularize the drake. The vivianne advise the karole. The vivianne alibi the karole. If the karole advise the drake then the drake advise the karole. If something tabularize the vivianne then the vivianne advise the drake. If something is eremitical then it advise the drake. The drake does not need the vivianne.", "logic": "\nMilky(karole)\nEndoergic(karole)\nEremitical(karole)\nAlibi(karole, drake)\nAlibi(karole, vivianne)\nTabularize(drake, karole)\nTabularize(drake, vivianne)\nAdvise(drake, vivianne)\nAlibi(drake, karole)\nAlibi(drake, vivianne)\nAperient(vivianne)\nEremitical(vivianne)\nTabularize(vivianne, drake)\nAdvise(vivianne, karole)\nAlibi(vivianne, karole)\nAdvise(karole, drake) -> Advise(drake, karole)\nforall x (Tabularize(x, vivianne) -> Advise(vivianne, drake))\nforall x (Eremitical(x) -> Advise(x, drake))\n\nnot Advise(drake, vivianne)\n\ntherefore Advise(drake, vivianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The fortuna is teutonic. The fortuna is exothermal. The fortuna is citified. The fortuna bechance the marsiella. The fortuna bechance the gunner. The marsiella till the fortuna. The marsiella till the gunner. The marsiella square the gunner. The marsiella bechance the fortuna. The marsiella bechance the gunner. The gunner is fell. The gunner is citified. The gunner till the marsiella. The gunner square the fortuna. The gunner bechance the fortuna. If the fortuna square the marsiella then the marsiella square the fortuna. If something till the gunner then the gunner square the marsiella. If something is citified then it square the marsiella. The fortuna square the marsiella.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(fortuna)\nExothermal(fortuna)\nCitified(fortuna)\nBechance(fortuna, marsiella)\nBechance(fortuna, gunner)\nTill(marsiella, fortuna)\nTill(marsiella, gunner)\nSquare(marsiella, gunner)\nBechance(marsiella, fortuna)\nBechance(marsiella, gunner)\nFell(gunner)\nCitified(gunner)\nTill(gunner, marsiella)\nSquare(gunner, fortuna)\nBechance(gunner, fortuna)\nSquare(fortuna, marsiella) -> Square(marsiella, fortuna)\nforall x (Till(x, gunner) -> Square(gunner, marsiella))\nforall x (Citified(x) -> Square(x, marsiella))\n\nSquare(fortuna, marsiella)\n\nCitified(fortuna) and forall x (Citified(x) -> Square(x, marsiella)) -> therefore Square(fortuna, marsiella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The ardith is medullated. The ardith is intestate. The ardith is mystifying. The ardith unfasten the daria. The ardith unfasten the sibby. The daria denominate the ardith. The daria denominate the sibby. The daria scaffold the sibby. The daria unfasten the ardith. The daria unfasten the sibby. The sibby is soiled. The sibby is mystifying. The sibby denominate the daria. The sibby scaffold the ardith. The sibby unfasten the ardith. If the ardith scaffold the daria then the daria scaffold the ardith. If something denominate the sibby then the sibby scaffold the daria. If something is mystifying then it scaffold the daria. The ardith does not need the daria.", "logic": "\nMedullated(ardith)\nIntestate(ardith)\nMystifying(ardith)\nUnfasten(ardith, daria)\nUnfasten(ardith, sibby)\nDenominate(daria, ardith)\nDenominate(daria, sibby)\nScaffold(daria, sibby)\nUnfasten(daria, ardith)\nUnfasten(daria, sibby)\nSoiled(sibby)\nMystifying(sibby)\nDenominate(sibby, daria)\nScaffold(sibby, ardith)\nUnfasten(sibby, ardith)\nScaffold(ardith, daria) -> Scaffold(daria, ardith)\nforall x (Denominate(x, sibby) -> Scaffold(sibby, daria))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) -> Scaffold(x, daria))\n\nnot Scaffold(ardith, daria)\n\nMystifying(ardith) and forall x (Mystifying(x) -> Scaffold(x, daria)) -> therefore Scaffold(ardith, daria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The maible is lxxxvii. The maible is sunburned. The maible is coseismic. The maible avalanche the mab. The maible avalanche the giancarlo. The mab creosote the maible. The mab creosote the giancarlo. The mab marshal the giancarlo. The mab avalanche the maible. The mab avalanche the giancarlo. The giancarlo is waggish. The giancarlo is coseismic. The giancarlo creosote the mab. The giancarlo marshal the maible. The giancarlo avalanche the maible. If the maible marshal the mab then the mab marshal the maible. If something creosote the giancarlo then the giancarlo marshal the mab. If something is coseismic then it marshal the mab. The mab marshal the maible.", "logic": "\nLxxxvii(maible)\nSunburned(maible)\nCoseismic(maible)\nAvalanche(maible, mab)\nAvalanche(maible, giancarlo)\nCreosote(mab, maible)\nCreosote(mab, giancarlo)\nMarshal(mab, giancarlo)\nAvalanche(mab, maible)\nAvalanche(mab, giancarlo)\nWaggish(giancarlo)\nCoseismic(giancarlo)\nCreosote(giancarlo, mab)\nMarshal(giancarlo, maible)\nAvalanche(giancarlo, maible)\nMarshal(maible, mab) -> Marshal(mab, maible)\nforall x (Creosote(x, giancarlo) -> Marshal(giancarlo, mab))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) -> Marshal(x, mab))\n\nMarshal(mab, maible)\n\nCoseismic(maible) and forall x (Coseismic(x) -> Marshal(x, mab)) -> therefore Marshal(maible, mab) Marshal(maible, mab) and Marshal(maible, mab) -> Marshal(mab, maible) -> therefore Marshal(mab, maible)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The joyann is mothproof. The joyann is glaucous. The joyann is malposed. The joyann foreclose the anjanette. The joyann foreclose the riannon. The anjanette siphon the joyann. The anjanette siphon the riannon. The anjanette ransack the riannon. The anjanette foreclose the joyann. The anjanette foreclose the riannon. The riannon is kantian. The riannon is malposed. The riannon siphon the anjanette. The riannon ransack the joyann. The riannon foreclose the joyann. If the joyann ransack the anjanette then the anjanette ransack the joyann. If something siphon the riannon then the riannon ransack the anjanette. If something is malposed then it ransack the anjanette. The anjanette does not need the joyann.", "logic": "\nMothproof(joyann)\nGlaucous(joyann)\nMalposed(joyann)\nForeclose(joyann, anjanette)\nForeclose(joyann, riannon)\nSiphon(anjanette, joyann)\nSiphon(anjanette, riannon)\nRansack(anjanette, riannon)\nForeclose(anjanette, joyann)\nForeclose(anjanette, riannon)\nKantian(riannon)\nMalposed(riannon)\nSiphon(riannon, anjanette)\nRansack(riannon, joyann)\nForeclose(riannon, joyann)\nRansack(joyann, anjanette) -> Ransack(anjanette, joyann)\nforall x (Siphon(x, riannon) -> Ransack(riannon, anjanette))\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> Ransack(x, anjanette))\n\nnot Ransack(anjanette, joyann)\n\nMalposed(joyann) and forall x (Malposed(x) -> Ransack(x, anjanette)) -> therefore Ransack(joyann, anjanette) Ransack(joyann, anjanette) and Ransack(joyann, anjanette) -> Ransack(anjanette, joyann) -> therefore Ransack(anjanette, joyann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The elana is small. The elana is roughish. The elana is inane. The elana overweary the colin. The elana overweary the jephthah. The colin disregard the elana. The colin disregard the jephthah. The colin souse the jephthah. The colin overweary the elana. The colin overweary the jephthah. The jephthah is unstrung. The jephthah is inane. The jephthah disregard the colin. The jephthah souse the elana. The jephthah overweary the elana. If the elana souse the colin then the colin souse the elana. If something disregard the jephthah then the jephthah souse the colin. If something is inane then it souse the colin. The colin does not need the colin.", "logic": "\nSmall(elana)\nRoughish(elana)\nInane(elana)\nOverweary(elana, colin)\nOverweary(elana, jephthah)\nDisregard(colin, elana)\nDisregard(colin, jephthah)\nSouse(colin, jephthah)\nOverweary(colin, elana)\nOverweary(colin, jephthah)\nUnstrung(jephthah)\nInane(jephthah)\nDisregard(jephthah, colin)\nSouse(jephthah, elana)\nOverweary(jephthah, elana)\nSouse(elana, colin) -> Souse(colin, elana)\nforall x (Disregard(x, jephthah) -> Souse(jephthah, colin))\nforall x (Inane(x) -> Souse(x, colin))\n\nnot Souse(colin, colin)\n\nforall x (Inane(x) -> Souse(x, colin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The aldis is marauding. The aldis is portrayed. The aldis is hypodermal. The aldis forfeit the kalindi. The aldis forfeit the rozamond. The kalindi madden the aldis. The kalindi madden the rozamond. The kalindi smoke the rozamond. The kalindi forfeit the aldis. The kalindi forfeit the rozamond. The rozamond is nauruan. The rozamond is hypodermal. The rozamond madden the kalindi. The rozamond smoke the aldis. The rozamond forfeit the aldis. If the aldis smoke the kalindi then the kalindi smoke the aldis. If something madden the rozamond then the rozamond smoke the kalindi. If something is hypodermal then it smoke the kalindi. The kalindi forfeit the kalindi.", "logic": "\nMarauding(aldis)\nPortrayed(aldis)\nHypodermal(aldis)\nForfeit(aldis, kalindi)\nForfeit(aldis, rozamond)\nMadden(kalindi, aldis)\nMadden(kalindi, rozamond)\nSmoke(kalindi, rozamond)\nForfeit(kalindi, aldis)\nForfeit(kalindi, rozamond)\nNauruan(rozamond)\nHypodermal(rozamond)\nMadden(rozamond, kalindi)\nSmoke(rozamond, aldis)\nForfeit(rozamond, aldis)\nSmoke(aldis, kalindi) -> Smoke(kalindi, aldis)\nforall x (Madden(x, rozamond) -> Smoke(rozamond, kalindi))\nforall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Smoke(x, kalindi))\n\nForfeit(kalindi, kalindi)\n\nForfeit(kalindi, kalindi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The edwina is bivalved. The edwina is starry. The edwina is systematic. The edwina counsel the jeralee. The edwina counsel the marlin. The jeralee chaffer the edwina. The jeralee chaffer the marlin. The jeralee slumber the marlin. The jeralee counsel the edwina. The jeralee counsel the marlin. The marlin is exempt. The marlin is systematic. The marlin chaffer the jeralee. The marlin slumber the edwina. The marlin counsel the edwina. If the edwina slumber the jeralee then the jeralee slumber the edwina. If something chaffer the marlin then the marlin slumber the jeralee. If something is systematic then it slumber the jeralee. The marlin does not like the marlin.", "logic": "\nBivalved(edwina)\nStarry(edwina)\nSystematic(edwina)\nCounsel(edwina, jeralee)\nCounsel(edwina, marlin)\nChaffer(jeralee, edwina)\nChaffer(jeralee, marlin)\nSlumber(jeralee, marlin)\nCounsel(jeralee, edwina)\nCounsel(jeralee, marlin)\nExempt(marlin)\nSystematic(marlin)\nChaffer(marlin, jeralee)\nSlumber(marlin, edwina)\nCounsel(marlin, edwina)\nSlumber(edwina, jeralee) -> Slumber(jeralee, edwina)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, marlin) -> Slumber(marlin, jeralee))\nforall x (Systematic(x) -> Slumber(x, jeralee))\n\nnot Chaffer(marlin, marlin)\n\nnot Chaffer(marlin, marlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The timothee is drugged. The timothee is welfarist. The timothee is foreign. The timothee egress the lanie. The timothee egress the hadria. The lanie mill the timothee. The lanie mill the hadria. The lanie moor the hadria. The lanie egress the timothee. The lanie egress the hadria. The hadria is queer. The hadria is foreign. The hadria mill the lanie. The hadria moor the timothee. The hadria egress the timothee. If the timothee moor the lanie then the lanie moor the timothee. If something mill the hadria then the hadria moor the lanie. If something is foreign then it moor the lanie. The timothee mill the lanie.", "logic": "\nDrugged(timothee)\nWelfarist(timothee)\nForeign(timothee)\nEgress(timothee, lanie)\nEgress(timothee, hadria)\nMill(lanie, timothee)\nMill(lanie, hadria)\nMoor(lanie, hadria)\nEgress(lanie, timothee)\nEgress(lanie, hadria)\nQueer(hadria)\nForeign(hadria)\nMill(hadria, lanie)\nMoor(hadria, timothee)\nEgress(hadria, timothee)\nMoor(timothee, lanie) -> Moor(lanie, timothee)\nforall x (Mill(x, hadria) -> Moor(hadria, lanie))\nforall x (Foreign(x) -> Moor(x, lanie))\n\nMill(timothee, lanie)\n\nMill(timothee, lanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The rabi is phony. The rabi is believable. The rabi is convolute. The rabi unravel the bengt. The rabi unravel the nunzio. The bengt turtle the rabi. The bengt turtle the nunzio. The bengt connote the nunzio. The bengt unravel the rabi. The bengt unravel the nunzio. The nunzio is godlike. The nunzio is convolute. The nunzio turtle the bengt. The nunzio connote the rabi. The nunzio unravel the rabi. If the rabi connote the bengt then the bengt connote the rabi. If something turtle the nunzio then the nunzio connote the bengt. If something is convolute then it connote the bengt. The bengt is not believable.", "logic": "\nPhony(rabi)\nBelievable(rabi)\nConvolute(rabi)\nUnravel(rabi, bengt)\nUnravel(rabi, nunzio)\nTurtle(bengt, rabi)\nTurtle(bengt, nunzio)\nConnote(bengt, nunzio)\nUnravel(bengt, rabi)\nUnravel(bengt, nunzio)\nGodlike(nunzio)\nConvolute(nunzio)\nTurtle(nunzio, bengt)\nConnote(nunzio, rabi)\nUnravel(nunzio, rabi)\nConnote(rabi, bengt) -> Connote(bengt, rabi)\nforall x (Turtle(x, nunzio) -> Connote(nunzio, bengt))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Connote(x, bengt))\n\nnot Believable(bengt)\n\nnot Believable(bengt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The olivia is effortless. The olivia is headless. The olivia is salable. The olivia devitalize the lucas. The olivia devitalize the marigold. The lucas gimp the olivia. The lucas gimp the marigold. The lucas enforce the marigold. The lucas devitalize the olivia. The lucas devitalize the marigold. The marigold is lxxiv. The marigold is salable. The marigold gimp the lucas. The marigold enforce the olivia. The marigold devitalize the olivia. If the olivia enforce the lucas then the lucas enforce the olivia. If something gimp the marigold then the marigold enforce the lucas. If something is salable then it enforce the lucas. The olivia is kind.", "logic": "\nEffortless(olivia)\nHeadless(olivia)\nSalable(olivia)\nDevitalize(olivia, lucas)\nDevitalize(olivia, marigold)\nGimp(lucas, olivia)\nGimp(lucas, marigold)\nEnforce(lucas, marigold)\nDevitalize(lucas, olivia)\nDevitalize(lucas, marigold)\nLxxiv(marigold)\nSalable(marigold)\nGimp(marigold, lucas)\nEnforce(marigold, olivia)\nDevitalize(marigold, olivia)\nEnforce(olivia, lucas) -> Enforce(lucas, olivia)\nforall x (Gimp(x, marigold) -> Enforce(marigold, lucas))\nforall x (Salable(x) -> Enforce(x, lucas))\n\nKind(olivia)\n\nKind(olivia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-247"} {"premises": "The betty does not eat the tabby. The betty is bidentate. The betty is darwinian. The betty massage the tabby. The tabby slow the betty. The tabby slow the willette. The tabby is unreduced. The tabby displume the betty. The tabby displume the willette. The willette slow the betty. The willette is unreduced. The willette displume the tabby. If something slow the tabby then the tabby does not see the betty. If something massage the willette and it massage the tabby then the willette does not need the betty. If something displume the tabby and the tabby does not need the betty then the tabby is darwinian. If something massage the tabby then it massage the willette. If something displume the betty then it slow the willette. If something massage the betty and it does not need the willette then the betty slow the willette. If something displume the betty then the betty slow the willette. If something slow the willette then it slow the betty. The betty massage the tabby.", "logic": "\nnot Slow(betty, tabby)\nBidentate(betty)\nDarwinian(betty)\nMassage(betty, tabby)\nSlow(tabby, betty)\nSlow(tabby, willette)\nUnreduced(tabby)\nDisplume(tabby, betty)\nDisplume(tabby, willette)\nSlow(willette, betty)\nUnreduced(willette)\nDisplume(willette, tabby)\nforall x (Slow(x, tabby) -> not Displume(tabby, betty))\nforall x (Massage(x, willette) and Massage(x, tabby) -> not Massage(willette, betty))\nforall x (Displume(x, tabby) and not Massage(tabby, betty) -> Darwinian(tabby))\nforall x (Massage(x, tabby) -> Massage(x, willette))\nforall x (Displume(x, betty) -> Slow(x, willette))\nforall x (Massage(x, betty) and not Massage(x, willette) -> Slow(betty, willette))\nforall x (Displume(x, betty) -> Slow(betty, willette))\nforall x (Slow(x, willette) -> Slow(x, betty))\n\nMassage(betty, tabby)\n\ntherefore Massage(betty, tabby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The kendall does not eat the hannis. The kendall is serflike. The kendall is winglike. The kendall remainder the hannis. The hannis paganise the kendall. The hannis paganise the loralie. The hannis is warm. The hannis moult the kendall. The hannis moult the loralie. The loralie paganise the kendall. The loralie is warm. The loralie moult the hannis. If something paganise the hannis then the hannis does not see the kendall. If something remainder the loralie and it remainder the hannis then the loralie does not need the kendall. If something moult the hannis and the hannis does not need the kendall then the hannis is winglike. If something remainder the hannis then it remainder the loralie. If something moult the kendall then it paganise the loralie. If something remainder the kendall and it does not need the loralie then the kendall paganise the loralie. If something moult the kendall then the kendall paganise the loralie. If something paganise the loralie then it paganise the kendall. The kendall does not need the hannis.", "logic": "\nnot Paganise(kendall, hannis)\nSerflike(kendall)\nWinglike(kendall)\nRemainder(kendall, hannis)\nPaganise(hannis, kendall)\nPaganise(hannis, loralie)\nWarm(hannis)\nMoult(hannis, kendall)\nMoult(hannis, loralie)\nPaganise(loralie, kendall)\nWarm(loralie)\nMoult(loralie, hannis)\nforall x (Paganise(x, hannis) -> not Moult(hannis, kendall))\nforall x (Remainder(x, loralie) and Remainder(x, hannis) -> not Remainder(loralie, kendall))\nforall x (Moult(x, hannis) and not Remainder(hannis, kendall) -> Winglike(hannis))\nforall x (Remainder(x, hannis) -> Remainder(x, loralie))\nforall x (Moult(x, kendall) -> Paganise(x, loralie))\nforall x (Remainder(x, kendall) and not Remainder(x, loralie) -> Paganise(kendall, loralie))\nforall x (Moult(x, kendall) -> Paganise(kendall, loralie))\nforall x (Paganise(x, loralie) -> Paganise(x, kendall))\n\nnot Remainder(kendall, hannis)\n\ntherefore Remainder(kendall, hannis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The jemima does not eat the judas. The jemima is witching. The jemima is robustious. The jemima contest the judas. The judas blemish the jemima. The judas blemish the heda. The judas is novel. The judas opacify the jemima. The judas opacify the heda. The heda blemish the jemima. The heda is novel. The heda opacify the judas. If something blemish the judas then the judas does not see the jemima. If something contest the heda and it contest the judas then the heda does not need the jemima. If something opacify the judas and the judas does not need the jemima then the judas is robustious. If something contest the judas then it contest the heda. If something opacify the jemima then it blemish the heda. If something contest the jemima and it does not need the heda then the jemima blemish the heda. If something opacify the jemima then the jemima blemish the heda. If something blemish the heda then it blemish the jemima. The jemima blemish the heda.", "logic": "\nnot Blemish(jemima, judas)\nWitching(jemima)\nRobustious(jemima)\nContest(jemima, judas)\nBlemish(judas, jemima)\nBlemish(judas, heda)\nNovel(judas)\nOpacify(judas, jemima)\nOpacify(judas, heda)\nBlemish(heda, jemima)\nNovel(heda)\nOpacify(heda, judas)\nforall x (Blemish(x, judas) -> not Opacify(judas, jemima))\nforall x (Contest(x, heda) and Contest(x, judas) -> not Contest(heda, jemima))\nforall x (Opacify(x, judas) and not Contest(judas, jemima) -> Robustious(judas))\nforall x (Contest(x, judas) -> Contest(x, heda))\nforall x (Opacify(x, jemima) -> Blemish(x, heda))\nforall x (Contest(x, jemima) and not Contest(x, heda) -> Blemish(jemima, heda))\nforall x (Opacify(x, jemima) -> Blemish(jemima, heda))\nforall x (Blemish(x, heda) -> Blemish(x, jemima))\n\nBlemish(jemima, heda)\n\nOpacify(judas, jemima) and forall x (Opacify(x, jemima) -> Blemish(jemima, heda)) -> therefore Blemish(jemima, heda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The gracie does not eat the alysia. The gracie is pistillate. The gracie is huffish. The gracie sauce the alysia. The alysia interlock the gracie. The alysia interlock the antonia. The alysia is agraphic. The alysia enlarge the gracie. The alysia enlarge the antonia. The antonia interlock the gracie. The antonia is agraphic. The antonia enlarge the alysia. If something interlock the alysia then the alysia does not see the gracie. If something sauce the antonia and it sauce the alysia then the antonia does not need the gracie. If something enlarge the alysia and the alysia does not need the gracie then the alysia is huffish. If something sauce the alysia then it sauce the antonia. If something enlarge the gracie then it interlock the antonia. If something sauce the gracie and it does not need the antonia then the gracie interlock the antonia. If something enlarge the gracie then the gracie interlock the antonia. If something interlock the antonia then it interlock the gracie. The gracie does not need the antonia.", "logic": "\nnot Interlock(gracie, alysia)\nPistillate(gracie)\nHuffish(gracie)\nSauce(gracie, alysia)\nInterlock(alysia, gracie)\nInterlock(alysia, antonia)\nAgraphic(alysia)\nEnlarge(alysia, gracie)\nEnlarge(alysia, antonia)\nInterlock(antonia, gracie)\nAgraphic(antonia)\nEnlarge(antonia, alysia)\nforall x (Interlock(x, alysia) -> not Enlarge(alysia, gracie))\nforall x (Sauce(x, antonia) and Sauce(x, alysia) -> not Sauce(antonia, gracie))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, alysia) and not Sauce(alysia, gracie) -> Huffish(alysia))\nforall x (Sauce(x, alysia) -> Sauce(x, antonia))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, gracie) -> Interlock(x, antonia))\nforall x (Sauce(x, gracie) and not Sauce(x, antonia) -> Interlock(gracie, antonia))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, gracie) -> Interlock(gracie, antonia))\nforall x (Interlock(x, antonia) -> Interlock(x, gracie))\n\nnot Sauce(gracie, antonia)\n\nSauce(gracie, alysia) and forall x (Sauce(x, alysia) -> Sauce(x, antonia)) -> therefore Sauce(gracie, antonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The josie does not eat the desmond. The josie is haptic. The josie is draggled. The josie meddle the desmond. The desmond horseshoe the josie. The desmond horseshoe the corena. The desmond is tokenish. The desmond tenderize the josie. The desmond tenderize the corena. The corena horseshoe the josie. The corena is tokenish. The corena tenderize the desmond. If something horseshoe the desmond then the desmond does not see the josie. If something meddle the corena and it meddle the desmond then the corena does not need the josie. If something tenderize the desmond and the desmond does not need the josie then the desmond is draggled. If something meddle the desmond then it meddle the corena. If something tenderize the josie then it horseshoe the corena. If something meddle the josie and it does not need the corena then the josie horseshoe the corena. If something tenderize the josie then the josie horseshoe the corena. If something horseshoe the corena then it horseshoe the josie. The corena does not need the josie.", "logic": "\nnot Horseshoe(josie, desmond)\nHaptic(josie)\nDraggled(josie)\nMeddle(josie, desmond)\nHorseshoe(desmond, josie)\nHorseshoe(desmond, corena)\nTokenish(desmond)\nTenderize(desmond, josie)\nTenderize(desmond, corena)\nHorseshoe(corena, josie)\nTokenish(corena)\nTenderize(corena, desmond)\nforall x (Horseshoe(x, desmond) -> not Tenderize(desmond, josie))\nforall x (Meddle(x, corena) and Meddle(x, desmond) -> not Meddle(corena, josie))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, desmond) and not Meddle(desmond, josie) -> Draggled(desmond))\nforall x (Meddle(x, desmond) -> Meddle(x, corena))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, josie) -> Horseshoe(x, corena))\nforall x (Meddle(x, josie) and not Meddle(x, corena) -> Horseshoe(josie, corena))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, josie) -> Horseshoe(josie, corena))\nforall x (Horseshoe(x, corena) -> Horseshoe(x, josie))\n\nnot Meddle(corena, josie)\n\nMeddle(josie, desmond) and forall x (Meddle(x, desmond) -> Meddle(x, corena)) -> therefore Meddle(josie, corena) Meddle(josie, corena) and Meddle(josie, desmond) and forall x (Meddle(x, corena) and Meddle(x, desmond) -> not Meddle(corena, josie)) -> therefore not Meddle(corena, josie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The martina does not eat the merrill. The martina is stock. The martina is grainy. The martina haul the merrill. The merrill backfire the martina. The merrill backfire the broderic. The merrill is hardfisted. The merrill gnaw the martina. The merrill gnaw the broderic. The broderic backfire the martina. The broderic is hardfisted. The broderic gnaw the merrill. If something backfire the merrill then the merrill does not see the martina. If something haul the broderic and it haul the merrill then the broderic does not need the martina. If something gnaw the merrill and the merrill does not need the martina then the merrill is grainy. If something haul the merrill then it haul the broderic. If something gnaw the martina then it backfire the broderic. If something haul the martina and it does not need the broderic then the martina backfire the broderic. If something gnaw the martina then the martina backfire the broderic. If something backfire the broderic then it backfire the martina. The martina does not eat the martina.", "logic": "\nnot Backfire(martina, merrill)\nStock(martina)\nGrainy(martina)\nHaul(martina, merrill)\nBackfire(merrill, martina)\nBackfire(merrill, broderic)\nHardfisted(merrill)\nGnaw(merrill, martina)\nGnaw(merrill, broderic)\nBackfire(broderic, martina)\nHardfisted(broderic)\nGnaw(broderic, merrill)\nforall x (Backfire(x, merrill) -> not Gnaw(merrill, martina))\nforall x (Haul(x, broderic) and Haul(x, merrill) -> not Haul(broderic, martina))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, merrill) and not Haul(merrill, martina) -> Grainy(merrill))\nforall x (Haul(x, merrill) -> Haul(x, broderic))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, martina) -> Backfire(x, broderic))\nforall x (Haul(x, martina) and not Haul(x, broderic) -> Backfire(martina, broderic))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, martina) -> Backfire(martina, broderic))\nforall x (Backfire(x, broderic) -> Backfire(x, martina))\n\nnot Backfire(martina, martina)\n\nGnaw(merrill, martina) and forall x (Gnaw(x, martina) -> Backfire(martina, broderic)) -> therefore Backfire(martina, broderic) Backfire(martina, broderic) and forall x (Backfire(x, broderic) -> Backfire(x, martina)) -> therefore Backfire(martina, martina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The evey does not eat the janos. The evey is estimable. The evey is turbid. The evey serenade the janos. The janos homologise the evey. The janos homologise the annissa. The janos is branchless. The janos airfreight the evey. The janos airfreight the annissa. The annissa homologise the evey. The annissa is branchless. The annissa airfreight the janos. If something homologise the janos then the janos does not see the evey. If something serenade the annissa and it serenade the janos then the annissa does not need the evey. If something airfreight the janos and the janos does not need the evey then the janos is turbid. If something serenade the janos then it serenade the annissa. If something airfreight the evey then it homologise the annissa. If something serenade the evey and it does not need the annissa then the evey homologise the annissa. If something airfreight the evey then the evey homologise the annissa. If something homologise the annissa then it homologise the evey. The janos is not turbid.", "logic": "\nnot Homologise(evey, janos)\nEstimable(evey)\nTurbid(evey)\nSerenade(evey, janos)\nHomologise(janos, evey)\nHomologise(janos, annissa)\nBranchless(janos)\nAirfreight(janos, evey)\nAirfreight(janos, annissa)\nHomologise(annissa, evey)\nBranchless(annissa)\nAirfreight(annissa, janos)\nforall x (Homologise(x, janos) -> not Airfreight(janos, evey))\nforall x (Serenade(x, annissa) and Serenade(x, janos) -> not Serenade(annissa, evey))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, janos) and not Serenade(janos, evey) -> Turbid(janos))\nforall x (Serenade(x, janos) -> Serenade(x, annissa))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, evey) -> Homologise(x, annissa))\nforall x (Serenade(x, evey) and not Serenade(x, annissa) -> Homologise(evey, annissa))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, evey) -> Homologise(evey, annissa))\nforall x (Homologise(x, annissa) -> Homologise(x, evey))\n\nnot Turbid(janos)\n\nforall x (Airfreight(x, janos) and not Serenade(janos, evey) -> Turbid(janos)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The wenonah does not eat the wilburn. The wenonah is ampullary. The wenonah is medicinal. The wenonah scrounge the wilburn. The wilburn vest the wenonah. The wilburn vest the gerhard. The wilburn is hyperopic. The wilburn inoculate the wenonah. The wilburn inoculate the gerhard. The gerhard vest the wenonah. The gerhard is hyperopic. The gerhard inoculate the wilburn. If something vest the wilburn then the wilburn does not see the wenonah. If something scrounge the gerhard and it scrounge the wilburn then the gerhard does not need the wenonah. If something inoculate the wilburn and the wilburn does not need the wenonah then the wilburn is medicinal. If something scrounge the wilburn then it scrounge the gerhard. If something inoculate the wenonah then it vest the gerhard. If something scrounge the wenonah and it does not need the gerhard then the wenonah vest the gerhard. If something inoculate the wenonah then the wenonah vest the gerhard. If something vest the gerhard then it vest the wenonah. The gerhard vest the gerhard.", "logic": "\nnot Vest(wenonah, wilburn)\nAmpullary(wenonah)\nMedicinal(wenonah)\nScrounge(wenonah, wilburn)\nVest(wilburn, wenonah)\nVest(wilburn, gerhard)\nHyperopic(wilburn)\nInoculate(wilburn, wenonah)\nInoculate(wilburn, gerhard)\nVest(gerhard, wenonah)\nHyperopic(gerhard)\nInoculate(gerhard, wilburn)\nforall x (Vest(x, wilburn) -> not Inoculate(wilburn, wenonah))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, gerhard) and Scrounge(x, wilburn) -> not Scrounge(gerhard, wenonah))\nforall x (Inoculate(x, wilburn) and not Scrounge(wilburn, wenonah) -> Medicinal(wilburn))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, wilburn) -> Scrounge(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Inoculate(x, wenonah) -> Vest(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, wenonah) and not Scrounge(x, gerhard) -> Vest(wenonah, gerhard))\nforall x (Inoculate(x, wenonah) -> Vest(wenonah, gerhard))\nforall x (Vest(x, gerhard) -> Vest(x, wenonah))\n\nVest(gerhard, gerhard)\n\nforall x (Inoculate(x, wenonah) -> Vest(x, gerhard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The dasi does not eat the zach. The dasi is stockinged. The dasi is fervid. The dasi defeminise the zach. The zach snuggle the dasi. The zach snuggle the emlyn. The zach is manky. The zach slap the dasi. The zach slap the emlyn. The emlyn snuggle the dasi. The emlyn is manky. The emlyn slap the zach. If something snuggle the zach then the zach does not see the dasi. If something defeminise the emlyn and it defeminise the zach then the emlyn does not need the dasi. If something slap the zach and the zach does not need the dasi then the zach is fervid. If something defeminise the zach then it defeminise the emlyn. If something slap the dasi then it snuggle the emlyn. If something defeminise the dasi and it does not need the emlyn then the dasi snuggle the emlyn. If something slap the dasi then the dasi snuggle the emlyn. If something snuggle the emlyn then it snuggle the dasi. The zach does not need the emlyn.", "logic": "\nnot Snuggle(dasi, zach)\nStockinged(dasi)\nFervid(dasi)\nDefeminise(dasi, zach)\nSnuggle(zach, dasi)\nSnuggle(zach, emlyn)\nManky(zach)\nSlap(zach, dasi)\nSlap(zach, emlyn)\nSnuggle(emlyn, dasi)\nManky(emlyn)\nSlap(emlyn, zach)\nforall x (Snuggle(x, zach) -> not Slap(zach, dasi))\nforall x (Defeminise(x, emlyn) and Defeminise(x, zach) -> not Defeminise(emlyn, dasi))\nforall x (Slap(x, zach) and not Defeminise(zach, dasi) -> Fervid(zach))\nforall x (Defeminise(x, zach) -> Defeminise(x, emlyn))\nforall x (Slap(x, dasi) -> Snuggle(x, emlyn))\nforall x (Defeminise(x, dasi) and not Defeminise(x, emlyn) -> Snuggle(dasi, emlyn))\nforall x (Slap(x, dasi) -> Snuggle(dasi, emlyn))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, emlyn) -> Snuggle(x, dasi))\n\nnot Defeminise(zach, emlyn)\n\nforall x (Defeminise(x, zach) -> Defeminise(x, emlyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The othello does not eat the dorita. The othello is bribable. The othello is gaping. The othello crosscut the dorita. The dorita slum the othello. The dorita slum the orlando. The dorita is tripartite. The dorita communise the othello. The dorita communise the orlando. The orlando slum the othello. The orlando is tripartite. The orlando communise the dorita. If something slum the dorita then the dorita does not see the othello. If something crosscut the orlando and it crosscut the dorita then the orlando does not need the othello. If something communise the dorita and the dorita does not need the othello then the dorita is gaping. If something crosscut the dorita then it crosscut the orlando. If something communise the othello then it slum the orlando. If something crosscut the othello and it does not need the orlando then the othello slum the orlando. If something communise the othello then the othello slum the orlando. If something slum the orlando then it slum the othello. The othello is kind.", "logic": "\nnot Slum(othello, dorita)\nBribable(othello)\nGaping(othello)\nCrosscut(othello, dorita)\nSlum(dorita, othello)\nSlum(dorita, orlando)\nTripartite(dorita)\nCommunise(dorita, othello)\nCommunise(dorita, orlando)\nSlum(orlando, othello)\nTripartite(orlando)\nCommunise(orlando, dorita)\nforall x (Slum(x, dorita) -> not Communise(dorita, othello))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, orlando) and Crosscut(x, dorita) -> not Crosscut(orlando, othello))\nforall x (Communise(x, dorita) and not Crosscut(dorita, othello) -> Gaping(dorita))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, dorita) -> Crosscut(x, orlando))\nforall x (Communise(x, othello) -> Slum(x, orlando))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, othello) and not Crosscut(x, orlando) -> Slum(othello, orlando))\nforall x (Communise(x, othello) -> Slum(othello, orlando))\nforall x (Slum(x, orlando) -> Slum(x, othello))\n\nKind(othello)\n\nKind(othello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The judy does not eat the ephram. The judy is every. The judy is misrelated. The judy query the ephram. The ephram bestialize the judy. The ephram bestialize the eli. The ephram is palliative. The ephram monetise the judy. The ephram monetise the eli. The eli bestialize the judy. The eli is palliative. The eli monetise the ephram. If something bestialize the ephram then the ephram does not see the judy. If something query the eli and it query the ephram then the eli does not need the judy. If something monetise the ephram and the ephram does not need the judy then the ephram is misrelated. If something query the ephram then it query the eli. If something monetise the judy then it bestialize the eli. If something query the judy and it does not need the eli then the judy bestialize the eli. If something monetise the judy then the judy bestialize the eli. If something bestialize the eli then it bestialize the judy. The ephram does not eat the ephram.", "logic": "\nnot Bestialize(judy, ephram)\nEvery(judy)\nMisrelated(judy)\nQuery(judy, ephram)\nBestialize(ephram, judy)\nBestialize(ephram, eli)\nPalliative(ephram)\nMonetise(ephram, judy)\nMonetise(ephram, eli)\nBestialize(eli, judy)\nPalliative(eli)\nMonetise(eli, ephram)\nforall x (Bestialize(x, ephram) -> not Monetise(ephram, judy))\nforall x (Query(x, eli) and Query(x, ephram) -> not Query(eli, judy))\nforall x (Monetise(x, ephram) and not Query(ephram, judy) -> Misrelated(ephram))\nforall x (Query(x, ephram) -> Query(x, eli))\nforall x (Monetise(x, judy) -> Bestialize(x, eli))\nforall x (Query(x, judy) and not Query(x, eli) -> Bestialize(judy, eli))\nforall x (Monetise(x, judy) -> Bestialize(judy, eli))\nforall x (Bestialize(x, eli) -> Bestialize(x, judy))\n\nnot Bestialize(ephram, ephram)\n\nnot Bestialize(ephram, ephram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The oren does not eat the maryellen. The oren is diestrual. The oren is disfigured. The oren benefact the maryellen. The maryellen renovate the oren. The maryellen renovate the marna. The maryellen is fumed. The maryellen game the oren. The maryellen game the marna. The marna renovate the oren. The marna is fumed. The marna game the maryellen. If something renovate the maryellen then the maryellen does not see the oren. If something benefact the marna and it benefact the maryellen then the marna does not need the oren. If something game the maryellen and the maryellen does not need the oren then the maryellen is disfigured. If something benefact the maryellen then it benefact the marna. If something game the oren then it renovate the marna. If something benefact the oren and it does not need the marna then the oren renovate the marna. If something game the oren then the oren renovate the marna. If something renovate the marna then it renovate the oren. The marna is big.", "logic": "\nnot Renovate(oren, maryellen)\nDiestrual(oren)\nDisfigured(oren)\nBenefact(oren, maryellen)\nRenovate(maryellen, oren)\nRenovate(maryellen, marna)\nFumed(maryellen)\nGame(maryellen, oren)\nGame(maryellen, marna)\nRenovate(marna, oren)\nFumed(marna)\nGame(marna, maryellen)\nforall x (Renovate(x, maryellen) -> not Game(maryellen, oren))\nforall x (Benefact(x, marna) and Benefact(x, maryellen) -> not Benefact(marna, oren))\nforall x (Game(x, maryellen) and not Benefact(maryellen, oren) -> Disfigured(maryellen))\nforall x (Benefact(x, maryellen) -> Benefact(x, marna))\nforall x (Game(x, oren) -> Renovate(x, marna))\nforall x (Benefact(x, oren) and not Benefact(x, marna) -> Renovate(oren, marna))\nforall x (Game(x, oren) -> Renovate(oren, marna))\nforall x (Renovate(x, marna) -> Renovate(x, oren))\n\nBig(marna)\n\nBig(marna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-596"} {"premises": "The isabella underprice the sasha. The sasha does not chase the lela. The lela is invidious. The bonita riposte the lela. If the lela does not need the sasha and the sasha is not crural then the lela is not gothic. If someone riposte the lela then the lela bogey the isabella. If someone riposte the sasha and they do not like the bonita then they are numidian. If the lela underprice the sasha and the sasha bogey the bonita then the lela bogey the sasha. If someone bogey the isabella then the isabella is crural. If someone is invidious and not gothic then they need the bonita. If someone underprice the bonita then they chase the bonita. If someone riposte the bonita and the bonita bogey the sasha then they do not like the sasha. The sasha does not chase the lela.", "logic": "\nUnderprice(isabella, sasha)\nnot Riposte(sasha, lela)\nInvidious(lela)\nRiposte(bonita, lela)\nnot Underprice(lela, sasha) and not Crural(sasha) -> not Gothic(lela)\nforall x (Riposte(x, lela) -> Bogey(lela, isabella))\nforall x (Riposte(x, sasha) and not Bogey(x, bonita) -> Numidian(x))\nUnderprice(lela, sasha) and Bogey(sasha, bonita) -> Bogey(lela, sasha)\nforall x (Bogey(x, isabella) -> Crural(isabella))\nforall x (Invidious(x) and not Gothic(x) -> Underprice(x, bonita))\nforall x (Underprice(x, bonita) -> Riposte(x, bonita))\nforall x (Riposte(x, bonita) and Bogey(bonita, sasha) -> not Bogey(x, sasha))\n\nnot Riposte(sasha, lela)\n\ntherefore not Riposte(sasha, lela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The nathalia mineralize the octavia. The octavia does not chase the ariella. The ariella is tenderised. The fenelia flaunt the ariella. If the ariella does not need the octavia and the octavia is not unbaptized then the ariella is not couthy. If someone flaunt the ariella then the ariella hatch the nathalia. If someone flaunt the octavia and they do not like the fenelia then they are streaming. If the ariella mineralize the octavia and the octavia hatch the fenelia then the ariella hatch the octavia. If someone hatch the nathalia then the nathalia is unbaptized. If someone is tenderised and not couthy then they need the fenelia. If someone mineralize the fenelia then they chase the fenelia. If someone flaunt the fenelia and the fenelia hatch the octavia then they do not like the octavia. The nathalia does not need the octavia.", "logic": "\nMineralize(nathalia, octavia)\nnot Flaunt(octavia, ariella)\nTenderised(ariella)\nFlaunt(fenelia, ariella)\nnot Mineralize(ariella, octavia) and not Unbaptized(octavia) -> not Couthy(ariella)\nforall x (Flaunt(x, ariella) -> Hatch(ariella, nathalia))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, octavia) and not Hatch(x, fenelia) -> Streaming(x))\nMineralize(ariella, octavia) and Hatch(octavia, fenelia) -> Hatch(ariella, octavia)\nforall x (Hatch(x, nathalia) -> Unbaptized(nathalia))\nforall x (Tenderised(x) and not Couthy(x) -> Mineralize(x, fenelia))\nforall x (Mineralize(x, fenelia) -> Flaunt(x, fenelia))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, fenelia) and Hatch(fenelia, octavia) -> not Hatch(x, octavia))\n\nnot Mineralize(nathalia, octavia)\n\ntherefore Mineralize(nathalia, octavia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The ilyse heat the lorrayne. The lorrayne does not chase the collie. The collie is rabbinic. The francoise absent the collie. If the collie does not need the lorrayne and the lorrayne is not energizing then the collie is not satanic. If someone absent the collie then the collie cocainise the ilyse. If someone absent the lorrayne and they do not like the francoise then they are sliding. If the collie heat the lorrayne and the lorrayne cocainise the francoise then the collie cocainise the lorrayne. If someone cocainise the ilyse then the ilyse is energizing. If someone is rabbinic and not satanic then they need the francoise. If someone heat the francoise then they chase the francoise. If someone absent the francoise and the francoise cocainise the lorrayne then they do not like the lorrayne. The collie cocainise the ilyse.", "logic": "\nHeat(ilyse, lorrayne)\nnot Absent(lorrayne, collie)\nRabbinic(collie)\nAbsent(francoise, collie)\nnot Heat(collie, lorrayne) and not Energizing(lorrayne) -> not Satanic(collie)\nforall x (Absent(x, collie) -> Cocainise(collie, ilyse))\nforall x (Absent(x, lorrayne) and not Cocainise(x, francoise) -> Sliding(x))\nHeat(collie, lorrayne) and Cocainise(lorrayne, francoise) -> Cocainise(collie, lorrayne)\nforall x (Cocainise(x, ilyse) -> Energizing(ilyse))\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) and not Satanic(x) -> Heat(x, francoise))\nforall x (Heat(x, francoise) -> Absent(x, francoise))\nforall x (Absent(x, francoise) and Cocainise(francoise, lorrayne) -> not Cocainise(x, lorrayne))\n\nCocainise(collie, ilyse)\n\nAbsent(francoise, collie) and forall x (Absent(x, collie) -> Cocainise(collie, ilyse)) -> therefore Cocainise(collie, ilyse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The orel wager the kalie. The kalie does not chase the tammara. The tammara is neonatal. The charisse swank the tammara. If the tammara does not need the kalie and the kalie is not pantropic then the tammara is not rapturous. If someone swank the tammara then the tammara dehumanize the orel. If someone swank the kalie and they do not like the charisse then they are impeccable. If the tammara wager the kalie and the kalie dehumanize the charisse then the tammara dehumanize the kalie. If someone dehumanize the orel then the orel is pantropic. If someone is neonatal and not rapturous then they need the charisse. If someone wager the charisse then they chase the charisse. If someone swank the charisse and the charisse dehumanize the kalie then they do not like the kalie. The tammara does not like the orel.", "logic": "\nWager(orel, kalie)\nnot Swank(kalie, tammara)\nNeonatal(tammara)\nSwank(charisse, tammara)\nnot Wager(tammara, kalie) and not Pantropic(kalie) -> not Rapturous(tammara)\nforall x (Swank(x, tammara) -> Dehumanize(tammara, orel))\nforall x (Swank(x, kalie) and not Dehumanize(x, charisse) -> Impeccable(x))\nWager(tammara, kalie) and Dehumanize(kalie, charisse) -> Dehumanize(tammara, kalie)\nforall x (Dehumanize(x, orel) -> Pantropic(orel))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) and not Rapturous(x) -> Wager(x, charisse))\nforall x (Wager(x, charisse) -> Swank(x, charisse))\nforall x (Swank(x, charisse) and Dehumanize(charisse, kalie) -> not Dehumanize(x, kalie))\n\nnot Dehumanize(tammara, orel)\n\nSwank(charisse, tammara) and forall x (Swank(x, tammara) -> Dehumanize(tammara, orel)) -> therefore Dehumanize(tammara, orel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The maryann sexualize the buffy. The buffy does not chase the jimbo. The jimbo is dyed. The krystalle trend the jimbo. If the jimbo does not need the buffy and the buffy is not retracted then the jimbo is not pursuant. If someone trend the jimbo then the jimbo jump the maryann. If someone trend the buffy and they do not like the krystalle then they are uttered. If the jimbo sexualize the buffy and the buffy jump the krystalle then the jimbo jump the buffy. If someone jump the maryann then the maryann is retracted. If someone is dyed and not pursuant then they need the krystalle. If someone sexualize the krystalle then they chase the krystalle. If someone trend the krystalle and the krystalle jump the buffy then they do not like the buffy. The maryann is retracted.", "logic": "\nSexualize(maryann, buffy)\nnot Trend(buffy, jimbo)\nDyed(jimbo)\nTrend(krystalle, jimbo)\nnot Sexualize(jimbo, buffy) and not Retracted(buffy) -> not Pursuant(jimbo)\nforall x (Trend(x, jimbo) -> Jump(jimbo, maryann))\nforall x (Trend(x, buffy) and not Jump(x, krystalle) -> Uttered(x))\nSexualize(jimbo, buffy) and Jump(buffy, krystalle) -> Jump(jimbo, buffy)\nforall x (Jump(x, maryann) -> Retracted(maryann))\nforall x (Dyed(x) and not Pursuant(x) -> Sexualize(x, krystalle))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, krystalle) -> Trend(x, krystalle))\nforall x (Trend(x, krystalle) and Jump(krystalle, buffy) -> not Jump(x, buffy))\n\nRetracted(maryann)\n\nTrend(krystalle, jimbo) and forall x (Trend(x, jimbo) -> Jump(jimbo, maryann)) -> therefore Jump(jimbo, maryann) Jump(jimbo, maryann) and forall x (Jump(x, maryann) -> Retracted(maryann)) -> therefore Retracted(maryann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The clem bach the lars. The lars does not chase the tiebold. The tiebold is hominid. The dario slum the tiebold. If the tiebold does not need the lars and the lars is not skinny then the tiebold is not cruciate. If someone slum the tiebold then the tiebold wheeze the clem. If someone slum the lars and they do not like the dario then they are chinchy. If the tiebold bach the lars and the lars wheeze the dario then the tiebold wheeze the lars. If someone wheeze the clem then the clem is skinny. If someone is hominid and not cruciate then they need the dario. If someone bach the dario then they chase the dario. If someone slum the dario and the dario wheeze the lars then they do not like the lars. The clem is not skinny.", "logic": "\nBach(clem, lars)\nnot Slum(lars, tiebold)\nHominid(tiebold)\nSlum(dario, tiebold)\nnot Bach(tiebold, lars) and not Skinny(lars) -> not Cruciate(tiebold)\nforall x (Slum(x, tiebold) -> Wheeze(tiebold, clem))\nforall x (Slum(x, lars) and not Wheeze(x, dario) -> Chinchy(x))\nBach(tiebold, lars) and Wheeze(lars, dario) -> Wheeze(tiebold, lars)\nforall x (Wheeze(x, clem) -> Skinny(clem))\nforall x (Hominid(x) and not Cruciate(x) -> Bach(x, dario))\nforall x (Bach(x, dario) -> Slum(x, dario))\nforall x (Slum(x, dario) and Wheeze(dario, lars) -> not Wheeze(x, lars))\n\nnot Skinny(clem)\n\nSlum(dario, tiebold) and forall x (Slum(x, tiebold) -> Wheeze(tiebold, clem)) -> therefore Wheeze(tiebold, clem) Wheeze(tiebold, clem) and forall x (Wheeze(x, clem) -> Skinny(clem)) -> therefore Skinny(clem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The graeme shirr the ariel. The ariel does not chase the gwendolyn. The gwendolyn is graphical. The gianina dropkick the gwendolyn. If the gwendolyn does not need the ariel and the ariel is not markovian then the gwendolyn is not allophonic. If someone dropkick the gwendolyn then the gwendolyn comprise the graeme. If someone dropkick the ariel and they do not like the gianina then they are illegible. If the gwendolyn shirr the ariel and the ariel comprise the gianina then the gwendolyn comprise the ariel. If someone comprise the graeme then the graeme is markovian. If someone is graphical and not allophonic then they need the gianina. If someone shirr the gianina then they chase the gianina. If someone dropkick the gianina and the gianina comprise the ariel then they do not like the ariel. The gianina is not illegible.", "logic": "\nShirr(graeme, ariel)\nnot Dropkick(ariel, gwendolyn)\nGraphical(gwendolyn)\nDropkick(gianina, gwendolyn)\nnot Shirr(gwendolyn, ariel) and not Markovian(ariel) -> not Allophonic(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Dropkick(x, gwendolyn) -> Comprise(gwendolyn, graeme))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, ariel) and not Comprise(x, gianina) -> Illegible(x))\nShirr(gwendolyn, ariel) and Comprise(ariel, gianina) -> Comprise(gwendolyn, ariel)\nforall x (Comprise(x, graeme) -> Markovian(graeme))\nforall x (Graphical(x) and not Allophonic(x) -> Shirr(x, gianina))\nforall x (Shirr(x, gianina) -> Dropkick(x, gianina))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, gianina) and Comprise(gianina, ariel) -> not Comprise(x, ariel))\n\nnot Illegible(gianina)\n\nforall x (Dropkick(x, ariel) and not Comprise(x, gianina) -> Illegible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The tessie reassail the mada. The mada does not chase the gearard. The gearard is lopsided. The morna moot the gearard. If the gearard does not need the mada and the mada is not redundant then the gearard is not stylistic. If someone moot the gearard then the gearard kayak the tessie. If someone moot the mada and they do not like the morna then they are lamblike. If the gearard reassail the mada and the mada kayak the morna then the gearard kayak the mada. If someone kayak the tessie then the tessie is redundant. If someone is lopsided and not stylistic then they need the morna. If someone reassail the morna then they chase the morna. If someone moot the morna and the morna kayak the mada then they do not like the mada. The morna reassail the morna.", "logic": "\nReassail(tessie, mada)\nnot Moot(mada, gearard)\nLopsided(gearard)\nMoot(morna, gearard)\nnot Reassail(gearard, mada) and not Redundant(mada) -> not Stylistic(gearard)\nforall x (Moot(x, gearard) -> Kayak(gearard, tessie))\nforall x (Moot(x, mada) and not Kayak(x, morna) -> Lamblike(x))\nReassail(gearard, mada) and Kayak(mada, morna) -> Kayak(gearard, mada)\nforall x (Kayak(x, tessie) -> Redundant(tessie))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) and not Stylistic(x) -> Reassail(x, morna))\nforall x (Reassail(x, morna) -> Moot(x, morna))\nforall x (Moot(x, morna) and Kayak(morna, mada) -> not Kayak(x, mada))\n\nReassail(morna, morna)\n\nforall x (Lopsided(x) and not Stylistic(x) -> Reassail(x, morna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The markus powwow the kerrie. The kerrie does not chase the elane. The elane is discovered. The hunt except the elane. If the elane does not need the kerrie and the kerrie is not egocentric then the elane is not velvet. If someone except the elane then the elane grieve the markus. If someone except the kerrie and they do not like the hunt then they are seaworthy. If the elane powwow the kerrie and the kerrie grieve the hunt then the elane grieve the kerrie. If someone grieve the markus then the markus is egocentric. If someone is discovered and not velvet then they need the hunt. If someone powwow the hunt then they chase the hunt. If someone except the hunt and the hunt grieve the kerrie then they do not like the kerrie. The elane does not like the kerrie.", "logic": "\nPowwow(markus, kerrie)\nnot Except(kerrie, elane)\nDiscovered(elane)\nExcept(hunt, elane)\nnot Powwow(elane, kerrie) and not Egocentric(kerrie) -> not Velvet(elane)\nforall x (Except(x, elane) -> Grieve(elane, markus))\nforall x (Except(x, kerrie) and not Grieve(x, hunt) -> Seaworthy(x))\nPowwow(elane, kerrie) and Grieve(kerrie, hunt) -> Grieve(elane, kerrie)\nforall x (Grieve(x, markus) -> Egocentric(markus))\nforall x (Discovered(x) and not Velvet(x) -> Powwow(x, hunt))\nforall x (Powwow(x, hunt) -> Except(x, hunt))\nforall x (Except(x, hunt) and Grieve(hunt, kerrie) -> not Grieve(x, kerrie))\n\nnot Grieve(elane, kerrie)\n\nPowwow(elane, kerrie) and Grieve(kerrie, hunt) -> Grieve(elane, kerrie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The felicio roast the carolie. The carolie does not chase the caro. The caro is hilarious. The friedrich reeve the caro. If the caro does not need the carolie and the carolie is not abandoned then the caro is not scanty. If someone reeve the caro then the caro tattle the felicio. If someone reeve the carolie and they do not like the friedrich then they are subjacent. If the caro roast the carolie and the carolie tattle the friedrich then the caro tattle the carolie. If someone tattle the felicio then the felicio is abandoned. If someone is hilarious and not scanty then they need the friedrich. If someone roast the friedrich then they chase the friedrich. If someone reeve the friedrich and the friedrich tattle the carolie then they do not like the carolie. The caro roast the felicio.", "logic": "\nRoast(felicio, carolie)\nnot Reeve(carolie, caro)\nHilarious(caro)\nReeve(friedrich, caro)\nnot Roast(caro, carolie) and not Abandoned(carolie) -> not Scanty(caro)\nforall x (Reeve(x, caro) -> Tattle(caro, felicio))\nforall x (Reeve(x, carolie) and not Tattle(x, friedrich) -> Subjacent(x))\nRoast(caro, carolie) and Tattle(carolie, friedrich) -> Tattle(caro, carolie)\nforall x (Tattle(x, felicio) -> Abandoned(felicio))\nforall x (Hilarious(x) and not Scanty(x) -> Roast(x, friedrich))\nforall x (Roast(x, friedrich) -> Reeve(x, friedrich))\nforall x (Reeve(x, friedrich) and Tattle(friedrich, carolie) -> not Tattle(x, carolie))\n\nRoast(caro, felicio)\n\nRoast(caro, felicio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The louisette birch the aurelea. The aurelea does not chase the julius. The julius is patient. The dahlia submarine the julius. If the julius does not need the aurelea and the aurelea is not slubbed then the julius is not vested. If someone submarine the julius then the julius rhapsodize the louisette. If someone submarine the aurelea and they do not like the dahlia then they are sintered. If the julius birch the aurelea and the aurelea rhapsodize the dahlia then the julius rhapsodize the aurelea. If someone rhapsodize the louisette then the louisette is slubbed. If someone is patient and not vested then they need the dahlia. If someone birch the dahlia then they chase the dahlia. If someone submarine the dahlia and the dahlia rhapsodize the aurelea then they do not like the aurelea. The dahlia does not like the louisette.", "logic": "\nBirch(louisette, aurelea)\nnot Submarine(aurelea, julius)\nPatient(julius)\nSubmarine(dahlia, julius)\nnot Birch(julius, aurelea) and not Slubbed(aurelea) -> not Vested(julius)\nforall x (Submarine(x, julius) -> Rhapsodize(julius, louisette))\nforall x (Submarine(x, aurelea) and not Rhapsodize(x, dahlia) -> Sintered(x))\nBirch(julius, aurelea) and Rhapsodize(aurelea, dahlia) -> Rhapsodize(julius, aurelea)\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, louisette) -> Slubbed(louisette))\nforall x (Patient(x) and not Vested(x) -> Birch(x, dahlia))\nforall x (Birch(x, dahlia) -> Submarine(x, dahlia))\nforall x (Submarine(x, dahlia) and Rhapsodize(dahlia, aurelea) -> not Rhapsodize(x, aurelea))\n\nnot Rhapsodize(dahlia, louisette)\n\nnot Rhapsodize(dahlia, louisette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "The bobina bloat the connolly. The connolly does not chase the calhoun. The calhoun is nautical. The horatio broider the calhoun. If the calhoun does not need the connolly and the connolly is not isoclinal then the calhoun is not smooth. If someone broider the calhoun then the calhoun acetify the bobina. If someone broider the connolly and they do not like the horatio then they are prostatic. If the calhoun bloat the connolly and the connolly acetify the horatio then the calhoun acetify the connolly. If someone acetify the bobina then the bobina is isoclinal. If someone is nautical and not smooth then they need the horatio. If someone bloat the horatio then they chase the horatio. If someone broider the horatio and the horatio acetify the connolly then they do not like the connolly. The horatio acetify the horatio.", "logic": "\nBloat(bobina, connolly)\nnot Broider(connolly, calhoun)\nNautical(calhoun)\nBroider(horatio, calhoun)\nnot Bloat(calhoun, connolly) and not Isoclinal(connolly) -> not Smooth(calhoun)\nforall x (Broider(x, calhoun) -> Acetify(calhoun, bobina))\nforall x (Broider(x, connolly) and not Acetify(x, horatio) -> Prostatic(x))\nBloat(calhoun, connolly) and Acetify(connolly, horatio) -> Acetify(calhoun, connolly)\nforall x (Acetify(x, bobina) -> Isoclinal(bobina))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and not Smooth(x) -> Bloat(x, horatio))\nforall x (Bloat(x, horatio) -> Broider(x, horatio))\nforall x (Broider(x, horatio) and Acetify(horatio, connolly) -> not Acetify(x, connolly))\n\nAcetify(horatio, horatio)\n\nAcetify(horatio, horatio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1459"} {"premises": "Misty is shoed. Misty is ataractic. Misty is not rickety. Misty is bouncy. Orville is adventive. Orville is shoed. Orville is rickety. Orville is not bouncy. Orville is comfy. Quent is not mitigatory. Quent is adventive. Quent is not shoed. Quent is rickety. Lori is rickety. Lori is bouncy. Lori is comfy. If Misty is ataractic and Misty is bouncy then Misty is not adventive. If something is bouncy and comfy then it is rickety. If something is comfy then it is mitigatory. All bouncy, adventive things are ataractic. If Lori is comfy and Lori is mitigatory then Lori is not adventive. If Lori is shoed and Lori is not adventive then Lori is ataractic. If something is adventive and not comfy then it is shoed. If something is bouncy and not mitigatory then it is not shoed. Orville is rickety.", "logic": "\nShoed(misty)\nAtaractic(misty)\nnot Rickety(misty)\nBouncy(misty)\nAdventive(orville)\nShoed(orville)\nRickety(orville)\nnot Bouncy(orville)\nComfy(orville)\nnot Mitigatory(quent)\nAdventive(quent)\nnot Shoed(quent)\nRickety(quent)\nRickety(lori)\nBouncy(lori)\nComfy(lori)\nAtaractic(misty) and Bouncy(misty) -> not Adventive(misty)\nforall x (Bouncy(x) and Comfy(x) -> Rickety(x))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\nforall x (Bouncy(x) and Adventive(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nComfy(lori) and Mitigatory(lori) -> not Adventive(lori)\nShoed(lori) and not Adventive(lori) -> Ataractic(lori)\nforall x (Adventive(x) and not Comfy(x) -> Shoed(x))\nforall x (Bouncy(x) and not Mitigatory(x) -> not Shoed(x))\n\nRickety(orville)\n\ntherefore Rickety(orville)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Louisa is pivotal. Louisa is cursorial. Louisa is not coseismal. Louisa is unchanging. Manny is epidemic. Manny is pivotal. Manny is coseismal. Manny is not unchanging. Manny is virginal. Woodrow is not widespread. Woodrow is epidemic. Woodrow is not pivotal. Woodrow is coseismal. Georgie is coseismal. Georgie is unchanging. Georgie is virginal. If Louisa is cursorial and Louisa is unchanging then Louisa is not epidemic. If something is unchanging and virginal then it is coseismal. If something is virginal then it is widespread. All unchanging, epidemic things are cursorial. If Georgie is virginal and Georgie is widespread then Georgie is not epidemic. If Georgie is pivotal and Georgie is not epidemic then Georgie is cursorial. If something is epidemic and not virginal then it is pivotal. If something is unchanging and not widespread then it is not pivotal. Woodrow is widespread.", "logic": "\nPivotal(louisa)\nCursorial(louisa)\nnot Coseismal(louisa)\nUnchanging(louisa)\nEpidemic(manny)\nPivotal(manny)\nCoseismal(manny)\nnot Unchanging(manny)\nVirginal(manny)\nnot Widespread(woodrow)\nEpidemic(woodrow)\nnot Pivotal(woodrow)\nCoseismal(woodrow)\nCoseismal(georgie)\nUnchanging(georgie)\nVirginal(georgie)\nCursorial(louisa) and Unchanging(louisa) -> not Epidemic(louisa)\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and Virginal(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Widespread(x))\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and Epidemic(x) -> Cursorial(x))\nVirginal(georgie) and Widespread(georgie) -> not Epidemic(georgie)\nPivotal(georgie) and not Epidemic(georgie) -> Cursorial(georgie)\nforall x (Epidemic(x) and not Virginal(x) -> Pivotal(x))\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and not Widespread(x) -> not Pivotal(x))\n\nWidespread(woodrow)\n\ntherefore not Widespread(woodrow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Rodney is painterly. Rodney is dread. Rodney is not unsown. Rodney is unpriestly. Ursuline is gossamer. Ursuline is painterly. Ursuline is unsown. Ursuline is not unpriestly. Ursuline is held. Job is not vacillant. Job is gossamer. Job is not painterly. Job is unsown. Vasily is unsown. Vasily is unpriestly. Vasily is held. If Rodney is dread and Rodney is unpriestly then Rodney is not gossamer. If something is unpriestly and held then it is unsown. If something is held then it is vacillant. All unpriestly, gossamer things are dread. If Vasily is held and Vasily is vacillant then Vasily is not gossamer. If Vasily is painterly and Vasily is not gossamer then Vasily is dread. If something is gossamer and not held then it is painterly. If something is unpriestly and not vacillant then it is not painterly. Vasily is vacillant.", "logic": "\nPainterly(rodney)\nDread(rodney)\nnot Unsown(rodney)\nUnpriestly(rodney)\nGossamer(ursuline)\nPainterly(ursuline)\nUnsown(ursuline)\nnot Unpriestly(ursuline)\nHeld(ursuline)\nnot Vacillant(job)\nGossamer(job)\nnot Painterly(job)\nUnsown(job)\nUnsown(vasily)\nUnpriestly(vasily)\nHeld(vasily)\nDread(rodney) and Unpriestly(rodney) -> not Gossamer(rodney)\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and Held(x) -> Unsown(x))\nforall x (Held(x) -> Vacillant(x))\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and Gossamer(x) -> Dread(x))\nHeld(vasily) and Vacillant(vasily) -> not Gossamer(vasily)\nPainterly(vasily) and not Gossamer(vasily) -> Dread(vasily)\nforall x (Gossamer(x) and not Held(x) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and not Vacillant(x) -> not Painterly(x))\n\nVacillant(vasily)\n\nHeld(vasily) and forall x (Held(x) -> Vacillant(x)) -> therefore Vacillant(vasily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Rochelle is convivial. Rochelle is lesbian. Rochelle is not diseased. Rochelle is uniate. Rawley is personal. Rawley is convivial. Rawley is diseased. Rawley is not uniate. Rawley is assuming. Nomi is not sliding. Nomi is personal. Nomi is not convivial. Nomi is diseased. Enriqueta is diseased. Enriqueta is uniate. Enriqueta is assuming. If Rochelle is lesbian and Rochelle is uniate then Rochelle is not personal. If something is uniate and assuming then it is diseased. If something is assuming then it is sliding. All uniate, personal things are lesbian. If Enriqueta is assuming and Enriqueta is sliding then Enriqueta is not personal. If Enriqueta is convivial and Enriqueta is not personal then Enriqueta is lesbian. If something is personal and not assuming then it is convivial. If something is uniate and not sliding then it is not convivial. Rawley is not sliding.", "logic": "\nConvivial(rochelle)\nLesbian(rochelle)\nnot Diseased(rochelle)\nUniate(rochelle)\nPersonal(rawley)\nConvivial(rawley)\nDiseased(rawley)\nnot Uniate(rawley)\nAssuming(rawley)\nnot Sliding(nomi)\nPersonal(nomi)\nnot Convivial(nomi)\nDiseased(nomi)\nDiseased(enriqueta)\nUniate(enriqueta)\nAssuming(enriqueta)\nLesbian(rochelle) and Uniate(rochelle) -> not Personal(rochelle)\nforall x (Uniate(x) and Assuming(x) -> Diseased(x))\nforall x (Assuming(x) -> Sliding(x))\nforall x (Uniate(x) and Personal(x) -> Lesbian(x))\nAssuming(enriqueta) and Sliding(enriqueta) -> not Personal(enriqueta)\nConvivial(enriqueta) and not Personal(enriqueta) -> Lesbian(enriqueta)\nforall x (Personal(x) and not Assuming(x) -> Convivial(x))\nforall x (Uniate(x) and not Sliding(x) -> not Convivial(x))\n\nnot Sliding(rawley)\n\nAssuming(rawley) and forall x (Assuming(x) -> Sliding(x)) -> therefore Sliding(rawley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Jewel is threefold. Jewel is bereft. Jewel is not discovered. Jewel is diastolic. Renae is undimmed. Renae is threefold. Renae is discovered. Renae is not diastolic. Renae is official. Moises is not obtrusive. Moises is undimmed. Moises is not threefold. Moises is discovered. Lucius is discovered. Lucius is diastolic. Lucius is official. If Jewel is bereft and Jewel is diastolic then Jewel is not undimmed. If something is diastolic and official then it is discovered. If something is official then it is obtrusive. All diastolic, undimmed things are bereft. If Lucius is official and Lucius is obtrusive then Lucius is not undimmed. If Lucius is threefold and Lucius is not undimmed then Lucius is bereft. If something is undimmed and not official then it is threefold. If something is diastolic and not obtrusive then it is not threefold. Lucius is not undimmed.", "logic": "\nThreefold(jewel)\nBereft(jewel)\nnot Discovered(jewel)\nDiastolic(jewel)\nUndimmed(renae)\nThreefold(renae)\nDiscovered(renae)\nnot Diastolic(renae)\nOfficial(renae)\nnot Obtrusive(moises)\nUndimmed(moises)\nnot Threefold(moises)\nDiscovered(moises)\nDiscovered(lucius)\nDiastolic(lucius)\nOfficial(lucius)\nBereft(jewel) and Diastolic(jewel) -> not Undimmed(jewel)\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Official(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Official(x) -> Obtrusive(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Undimmed(x) -> Bereft(x))\nOfficial(lucius) and Obtrusive(lucius) -> not Undimmed(lucius)\nThreefold(lucius) and not Undimmed(lucius) -> Bereft(lucius)\nforall x (Undimmed(x) and not Official(x) -> Threefold(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and not Obtrusive(x) -> not Threefold(x))\n\nnot Undimmed(lucius)\n\nOfficial(lucius) and forall x (Official(x) -> Obtrusive(x)) -> therefore Obtrusive(lucius) Official(lucius) and Obtrusive(lucius) and Official(lucius) and Obtrusive(lucius) -> not Undimmed(lucius) -> therefore not Undimmed(lucius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Arturo is maximal. Arturo is cuspated. Arturo is not threatened. Arturo is inquiring. Rupert is cottony. Rupert is maximal. Rupert is threatened. Rupert is not inquiring. Rupert is congenial. Emmalyn is not unifoliate. Emmalyn is cottony. Emmalyn is not maximal. Emmalyn is threatened. Frederic is threatened. Frederic is inquiring. Frederic is congenial. If Arturo is cuspated and Arturo is inquiring then Arturo is not cottony. If something is inquiring and congenial then it is threatened. If something is congenial then it is unifoliate. All inquiring, cottony things are cuspated. If Frederic is congenial and Frederic is unifoliate then Frederic is not cottony. If Frederic is maximal and Frederic is not cottony then Frederic is cuspated. If something is cottony and not congenial then it is maximal. If something is inquiring and not unifoliate then it is not maximal. Frederic is cottony.", "logic": "\nMaximal(arturo)\nCuspated(arturo)\nnot Threatened(arturo)\nInquiring(arturo)\nCottony(rupert)\nMaximal(rupert)\nThreatened(rupert)\nnot Inquiring(rupert)\nCongenial(rupert)\nnot Unifoliate(emmalyn)\nCottony(emmalyn)\nnot Maximal(emmalyn)\nThreatened(emmalyn)\nThreatened(frederic)\nInquiring(frederic)\nCongenial(frederic)\nCuspated(arturo) and Inquiring(arturo) -> not Cottony(arturo)\nforall x (Inquiring(x) and Congenial(x) -> Threatened(x))\nforall x (Congenial(x) -> Unifoliate(x))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) and Cottony(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nCongenial(frederic) and Unifoliate(frederic) -> not Cottony(frederic)\nMaximal(frederic) and not Cottony(frederic) -> Cuspated(frederic)\nforall x (Cottony(x) and not Congenial(x) -> Maximal(x))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) and not Unifoliate(x) -> not Maximal(x))\n\nCottony(frederic)\n\nCongenial(frederic) and forall x (Congenial(x) -> Unifoliate(x)) -> therefore Unifoliate(frederic) Congenial(frederic) and Unifoliate(frederic) and Congenial(frederic) and Unifoliate(frederic) -> not Cottony(frederic) -> therefore not Cottony(frederic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Emelyne is semipublic. Emelyne is cranky. Emelyne is not paranasal. Emelyne is chainlike. Adah is lowland. Adah is semipublic. Adah is paranasal. Adah is not chainlike. Adah is inky. Albertine is not luxuriant. Albertine is lowland. Albertine is not semipublic. Albertine is paranasal. Kathryne is paranasal. Kathryne is chainlike. Kathryne is inky. If Emelyne is cranky and Emelyne is chainlike then Emelyne is not lowland. If something is chainlike and inky then it is paranasal. If something is inky then it is luxuriant. All chainlike, lowland things are cranky. If Kathryne is inky and Kathryne is luxuriant then Kathryne is not lowland. If Kathryne is semipublic and Kathryne is not lowland then Kathryne is cranky. If something is lowland and not inky then it is semipublic. If something is chainlike and not luxuriant then it is not semipublic. Kathryne is not semipublic.", "logic": "\nSemipublic(emelyne)\nCranky(emelyne)\nnot Paranasal(emelyne)\nChainlike(emelyne)\nLowland(adah)\nSemipublic(adah)\nParanasal(adah)\nnot Chainlike(adah)\nInky(adah)\nnot Luxuriant(albertine)\nLowland(albertine)\nnot Semipublic(albertine)\nParanasal(albertine)\nParanasal(kathryne)\nChainlike(kathryne)\nInky(kathryne)\nCranky(emelyne) and Chainlike(emelyne) -> not Lowland(emelyne)\nforall x (Chainlike(x) and Inky(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Inky(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Chainlike(x) and Lowland(x) -> Cranky(x))\nInky(kathryne) and Luxuriant(kathryne) -> not Lowland(kathryne)\nSemipublic(kathryne) and not Lowland(kathryne) -> Cranky(kathryne)\nforall x (Lowland(x) and not Inky(x) -> Semipublic(x))\nforall x (Chainlike(x) and not Luxuriant(x) -> not Semipublic(x))\n\nnot Semipublic(kathryne)\n\nforall x (Lowland(x) and not Inky(x) -> Semipublic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Devan is absent. Devan is napped. Devan is not caulked. Devan is spinose. Mikey is ulcerated. Mikey is absent. Mikey is caulked. Mikey is not spinose. Mikey is sleeved. Lonny is not lunatic. Lonny is ulcerated. Lonny is not absent. Lonny is caulked. Yetty is caulked. Yetty is spinose. Yetty is sleeved. If Devan is napped and Devan is spinose then Devan is not ulcerated. If something is spinose and sleeved then it is caulked. If something is sleeved then it is lunatic. All spinose, ulcerated things are napped. If Yetty is sleeved and Yetty is lunatic then Yetty is not ulcerated. If Yetty is absent and Yetty is not ulcerated then Yetty is napped. If something is ulcerated and not sleeved then it is absent. If something is spinose and not lunatic then it is not absent. Lonny is napped.", "logic": "\nAbsent(devan)\nNapped(devan)\nnot Caulked(devan)\nSpinose(devan)\nUlcerated(mikey)\nAbsent(mikey)\nCaulked(mikey)\nnot Spinose(mikey)\nSleeved(mikey)\nnot Lunatic(lonny)\nUlcerated(lonny)\nnot Absent(lonny)\nCaulked(lonny)\nCaulked(yetty)\nSpinose(yetty)\nSleeved(yetty)\nNapped(devan) and Spinose(devan) -> not Ulcerated(devan)\nforall x (Spinose(x) and Sleeved(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Sleeved(x) -> Lunatic(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) and Ulcerated(x) -> Napped(x))\nSleeved(yetty) and Lunatic(yetty) -> not Ulcerated(yetty)\nAbsent(yetty) and not Ulcerated(yetty) -> Napped(yetty)\nforall x (Ulcerated(x) and not Sleeved(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) and not Lunatic(x) -> not Absent(x))\n\nNapped(lonny)\n\nforall x (Spinose(x) and Ulcerated(x) -> Napped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Rollins is niggling. Rollins is polychrome. Rollins is not extraneous. Rollins is clubby. Cherilynn is steep. Cherilynn is niggling. Cherilynn is extraneous. Cherilynn is not clubby. Cherilynn is void. Partha is not myeloid. Partha is steep. Partha is not niggling. Partha is extraneous. Jeannette is extraneous. Jeannette is clubby. Jeannette is void. If Rollins is polychrome and Rollins is clubby then Rollins is not steep. If something is clubby and void then it is extraneous. If something is void then it is myeloid. All clubby, steep things are polychrome. If Jeannette is void and Jeannette is myeloid then Jeannette is not steep. If Jeannette is niggling and Jeannette is not steep then Jeannette is polychrome. If something is steep and not void then it is niggling. If something is clubby and not myeloid then it is not niggling. Jeannette is not polychrome.", "logic": "\nNiggling(rollins)\nPolychrome(rollins)\nnot Extraneous(rollins)\nClubby(rollins)\nSteep(cherilynn)\nNiggling(cherilynn)\nExtraneous(cherilynn)\nnot Clubby(cherilynn)\nVoid(cherilynn)\nnot Myeloid(partha)\nSteep(partha)\nnot Niggling(partha)\nExtraneous(partha)\nExtraneous(jeannette)\nClubby(jeannette)\nVoid(jeannette)\nPolychrome(rollins) and Clubby(rollins) -> not Steep(rollins)\nforall x (Clubby(x) and Void(x) -> Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Void(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) and Steep(x) -> Polychrome(x))\nVoid(jeannette) and Myeloid(jeannette) -> not Steep(jeannette)\nNiggling(jeannette) and not Steep(jeannette) -> Polychrome(jeannette)\nforall x (Steep(x) and not Void(x) -> Niggling(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) and not Myeloid(x) -> not Niggling(x))\n\nnot Polychrome(jeannette)\n\nforall x (Clubby(x) and Steep(x) -> Polychrome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Teresa is pinstriped. Teresa is jumbo. Teresa is not loverlike. Teresa is reverting. Mathias is macedonian. Mathias is pinstriped. Mathias is loverlike. Mathias is not reverting. Mathias is capacious. Ameline is not indistinct. Ameline is macedonian. Ameline is not pinstriped. Ameline is loverlike. Meara is loverlike. Meara is reverting. Meara is capacious. If Teresa is jumbo and Teresa is reverting then Teresa is not macedonian. If something is reverting and capacious then it is loverlike. If something is capacious then it is indistinct. All reverting, macedonian things are jumbo. If Meara is capacious and Meara is indistinct then Meara is not macedonian. If Meara is pinstriped and Meara is not macedonian then Meara is jumbo. If something is macedonian and not capacious then it is pinstriped. If something is reverting and not indistinct then it is not pinstriped. Ameline is capacious.", "logic": "\nPinstriped(teresa)\nJumbo(teresa)\nnot Loverlike(teresa)\nReverting(teresa)\nMacedonian(mathias)\nPinstriped(mathias)\nLoverlike(mathias)\nnot Reverting(mathias)\nCapacious(mathias)\nnot Indistinct(ameline)\nMacedonian(ameline)\nnot Pinstriped(ameline)\nLoverlike(ameline)\nLoverlike(meara)\nReverting(meara)\nCapacious(meara)\nJumbo(teresa) and Reverting(teresa) -> not Macedonian(teresa)\nforall x (Reverting(x) and Capacious(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Capacious(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nforall x (Reverting(x) and Macedonian(x) -> Jumbo(x))\nCapacious(meara) and Indistinct(meara) -> not Macedonian(meara)\nPinstriped(meara) and not Macedonian(meara) -> Jumbo(meara)\nforall x (Macedonian(x) and not Capacious(x) -> Pinstriped(x))\nforall x (Reverting(x) and not Indistinct(x) -> not Pinstriped(x))\n\nCapacious(ameline)\n\nCapacious(ameline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Archibald is anemic. Archibald is archival. Archibald is not unhearable. Archibald is erectile. Hendrika is custodial. Hendrika is anemic. Hendrika is unhearable. Hendrika is not erectile. Hendrika is hexed. Merridie is not lank. Merridie is custodial. Merridie is not anemic. Merridie is unhearable. Stirling is unhearable. Stirling is erectile. Stirling is hexed. If Archibald is archival and Archibald is erectile then Archibald is not custodial. If something is erectile and hexed then it is unhearable. If something is hexed then it is lank. All erectile, custodial things are archival. If Stirling is hexed and Stirling is lank then Stirling is not custodial. If Stirling is anemic and Stirling is not custodial then Stirling is archival. If something is custodial and not hexed then it is anemic. If something is erectile and not lank then it is not anemic. Archibald is not hexed.", "logic": "\nAnemic(archibald)\nArchival(archibald)\nnot Unhearable(archibald)\nErectile(archibald)\nCustodial(hendrika)\nAnemic(hendrika)\nUnhearable(hendrika)\nnot Erectile(hendrika)\nHexed(hendrika)\nnot Lank(merridie)\nCustodial(merridie)\nnot Anemic(merridie)\nUnhearable(merridie)\nUnhearable(stirling)\nErectile(stirling)\nHexed(stirling)\nArchival(archibald) and Erectile(archibald) -> not Custodial(archibald)\nforall x (Erectile(x) and Hexed(x) -> Unhearable(x))\nforall x (Hexed(x) -> Lank(x))\nforall x (Erectile(x) and Custodial(x) -> Archival(x))\nHexed(stirling) and Lank(stirling) -> not Custodial(stirling)\nAnemic(stirling) and not Custodial(stirling) -> Archival(stirling)\nforall x (Custodial(x) and not Hexed(x) -> Anemic(x))\nforall x (Erectile(x) and not Lank(x) -> not Anemic(x))\n\nnot Hexed(archibald)\n\nnot Hexed(archibald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Layne is befitting. Layne is effete. Layne is not minty. Layne is unsoluble. Eberhard is angelic. Eberhard is befitting. Eberhard is minty. Eberhard is not unsoluble. Eberhard is branchiate. Kaja is not condolent. Kaja is angelic. Kaja is not befitting. Kaja is minty. Jocelin is minty. Jocelin is unsoluble. Jocelin is branchiate. If Layne is effete and Layne is unsoluble then Layne is not angelic. If something is unsoluble and branchiate then it is minty. If something is branchiate then it is condolent. All unsoluble, angelic things are effete. If Jocelin is branchiate and Jocelin is condolent then Jocelin is not angelic. If Jocelin is befitting and Jocelin is not angelic then Jocelin is effete. If something is angelic and not branchiate then it is befitting. If something is unsoluble and not condolent then it is not befitting. Kaja is unsoluble.", "logic": "\nBefitting(layne)\nEffete(layne)\nnot Minty(layne)\nUnsoluble(layne)\nAngelic(eberhard)\nBefitting(eberhard)\nMinty(eberhard)\nnot Unsoluble(eberhard)\nBranchiate(eberhard)\nnot Condolent(kaja)\nAngelic(kaja)\nnot Befitting(kaja)\nMinty(kaja)\nMinty(jocelin)\nUnsoluble(jocelin)\nBranchiate(jocelin)\nEffete(layne) and Unsoluble(layne) -> not Angelic(layne)\nforall x (Unsoluble(x) and Branchiate(x) -> Minty(x))\nforall x (Branchiate(x) -> Condolent(x))\nforall x (Unsoluble(x) and Angelic(x) -> Effete(x))\nBranchiate(jocelin) and Condolent(jocelin) -> not Angelic(jocelin)\nBefitting(jocelin) and not Angelic(jocelin) -> Effete(jocelin)\nforall x (Angelic(x) and not Branchiate(x) -> Befitting(x))\nforall x (Unsoluble(x) and not Condolent(x) -> not Befitting(x))\n\nUnsoluble(kaja)\n\nUnsoluble(kaja) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-963"} {"premises": "Selie is not natal. Selie is affixal. Adore is not dissident. Adore is booked. Adore is corrected. Adore is not wishful. Adore is natal. Berti is corrected. Berti is wishful. Berti is natal. If Selie is affixal then Selie is dissident. If someone is corrected then they are natal. If Berti is evidenced then Berti is booked. If someone is corrected and wishful then they are dissident. If someone is wishful then they are evidenced. All natal people are corrected. If Adore is dissident and Adore is corrected then Adore is affixal. If Selie is natal and Selie is not evidenced then Selie is booked. Berti is wishful.", "logic": "\nnot Natal(selie)\nAffixal(selie)\nnot Dissident(adore)\nBooked(adore)\nCorrected(adore)\nnot Wishful(adore)\nNatal(adore)\nCorrected(berti)\nWishful(berti)\nNatal(berti)\nAffixal(selie) -> Dissident(selie)\nforall x (Corrected(x) -> Natal(x))\nEvidenced(berti) -> Booked(berti)\nforall x (Corrected(x) and Wishful(x) -> Dissident(x))\nforall x (Wishful(x) -> Evidenced(x))\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Corrected(x))\nDissident(adore) and Corrected(adore) -> Affixal(adore)\nNatal(selie) and not Evidenced(selie) -> Booked(selie)\n\nWishful(berti)\n\ntherefore Wishful(berti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Alain is not incomplete. Alain is melted. Waylen is not hilar. Waylen is manly. Waylen is antithetic. Waylen is not acropetal. Waylen is incomplete. Annalise is antithetic. Annalise is acropetal. Annalise is incomplete. If Alain is melted then Alain is hilar. If someone is antithetic then they are incomplete. If Annalise is saclike then Annalise is manly. If someone is antithetic and acropetal then they are hilar. If someone is acropetal then they are saclike. All incomplete people are antithetic. If Waylen is hilar and Waylen is antithetic then Waylen is melted. If Alain is incomplete and Alain is not saclike then Alain is manly. Waylen is not antithetic.", "logic": "\nnot Incomplete(alain)\nMelted(alain)\nnot Hilar(waylen)\nManly(waylen)\nAntithetic(waylen)\nnot Acropetal(waylen)\nIncomplete(waylen)\nAntithetic(annalise)\nAcropetal(annalise)\nIncomplete(annalise)\nMelted(alain) -> Hilar(alain)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Incomplete(x))\nSaclike(annalise) -> Manly(annalise)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) and Acropetal(x) -> Hilar(x))\nforall x (Acropetal(x) -> Saclike(x))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nHilar(waylen) and Antithetic(waylen) -> Melted(waylen)\nIncomplete(alain) and not Saclike(alain) -> Manly(alain)\n\nnot Antithetic(waylen)\n\ntherefore Antithetic(waylen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Brandi is not westbound. Brandi is profligate. Aryn is not evacuant. Aryn is brainless. Aryn is slapdash. Aryn is not compact. Aryn is westbound. Pia is slapdash. Pia is compact. Pia is westbound. If Brandi is profligate then Brandi is evacuant. If someone is slapdash then they are westbound. If Pia is expendable then Pia is brainless. If someone is slapdash and compact then they are evacuant. If someone is compact then they are expendable. All westbound people are slapdash. If Aryn is evacuant and Aryn is slapdash then Aryn is profligate. If Brandi is westbound and Brandi is not expendable then Brandi is brainless. Brandi is evacuant.", "logic": "\nnot Westbound(brandi)\nProfligate(brandi)\nnot Evacuant(aryn)\nBrainless(aryn)\nSlapdash(aryn)\nnot Compact(aryn)\nWestbound(aryn)\nSlapdash(pia)\nCompact(pia)\nWestbound(pia)\nProfligate(brandi) -> Evacuant(brandi)\nforall x (Slapdash(x) -> Westbound(x))\nExpendable(pia) -> Brainless(pia)\nforall x (Slapdash(x) and Compact(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Compact(x) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Westbound(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nEvacuant(aryn) and Slapdash(aryn) -> Profligate(aryn)\nWestbound(brandi) and not Expendable(brandi) -> Brainless(brandi)\n\nEvacuant(brandi)\n\nProfligate(brandi) and Profligate(brandi) -> Evacuant(brandi) -> therefore Evacuant(brandi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Sasha is not afferent. Sasha is inducive. Darrell is not satyric. Darrell is analytic. Darrell is moblike. Darrell is not scarey. Darrell is afferent. Judd is moblike. Judd is scarey. Judd is afferent. If Sasha is inducive then Sasha is satyric. If someone is moblike then they are afferent. If Judd is thin then Judd is analytic. If someone is moblike and scarey then they are satyric. If someone is scarey then they are thin. All afferent people are moblike. If Darrell is satyric and Darrell is moblike then Darrell is inducive. If Sasha is afferent and Sasha is not thin then Sasha is analytic. Sasha is not satyric.", "logic": "\nnot Afferent(sasha)\nInducive(sasha)\nnot Satyric(darrell)\nAnalytic(darrell)\nMoblike(darrell)\nnot Scarey(darrell)\nAfferent(darrell)\nMoblike(judd)\nScarey(judd)\nAfferent(judd)\nInducive(sasha) -> Satyric(sasha)\nforall x (Moblike(x) -> Afferent(x))\nThin(judd) -> Analytic(judd)\nforall x (Moblike(x) and Scarey(x) -> Satyric(x))\nforall x (Scarey(x) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Afferent(x) -> Moblike(x))\nSatyric(darrell) and Moblike(darrell) -> Inducive(darrell)\nAfferent(sasha) and not Thin(sasha) -> Analytic(sasha)\n\nnot Satyric(sasha)\n\nInducive(sasha) and Inducive(sasha) -> Satyric(sasha) -> therefore Satyric(sasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Pasquale is not bumbling. Pasquale is unpeaceful. Spence is not pledged. Spence is tertian. Spence is lilting. Spence is not postmodern. Spence is bumbling. Trula is lilting. Trula is postmodern. Trula is bumbling. If Pasquale is unpeaceful then Pasquale is pledged. If someone is lilting then they are bumbling. If Trula is meddling then Trula is tertian. If someone is lilting and postmodern then they are pledged. If someone is postmodern then they are meddling. All bumbling people are lilting. If Spence is pledged and Spence is lilting then Spence is unpeaceful. If Pasquale is bumbling and Pasquale is not meddling then Pasquale is tertian. Trula is tertian.", "logic": "\nnot Bumbling(pasquale)\nUnpeaceful(pasquale)\nnot Pledged(spence)\nTertian(spence)\nLilting(spence)\nnot Postmodern(spence)\nBumbling(spence)\nLilting(trula)\nPostmodern(trula)\nBumbling(trula)\nUnpeaceful(pasquale) -> Pledged(pasquale)\nforall x (Lilting(x) -> Bumbling(x))\nMeddling(trula) -> Tertian(trula)\nforall x (Lilting(x) and Postmodern(x) -> Pledged(x))\nforall x (Postmodern(x) -> Meddling(x))\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Lilting(x))\nPledged(spence) and Lilting(spence) -> Unpeaceful(spence)\nBumbling(pasquale) and not Meddling(pasquale) -> Tertian(pasquale)\n\nTertian(trula)\n\nPostmodern(trula) and forall x (Postmodern(x) -> Meddling(x)) -> therefore Meddling(trula) Meddling(trula) and Meddling(trula) -> Tertian(trula) -> therefore Tertian(trula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Dotti is not anaphoric. Dotti is uppity. Lilas is not bedewed. Lilas is luxe. Lilas is tricolor. Lilas is not editorial. Lilas is anaphoric. Aguste is tricolor. Aguste is editorial. Aguste is anaphoric. If Dotti is uppity then Dotti is bedewed. If someone is tricolor then they are anaphoric. If Aguste is skinny then Aguste is luxe. If someone is tricolor and editorial then they are bedewed. If someone is editorial then they are skinny. All anaphoric people are tricolor. If Lilas is bedewed and Lilas is tricolor then Lilas is uppity. If Dotti is anaphoric and Dotti is not skinny then Dotti is luxe. Aguste is not luxe.", "logic": "\nnot Anaphoric(dotti)\nUppity(dotti)\nnot Bedewed(lilas)\nLuxe(lilas)\nTricolor(lilas)\nnot Editorial(lilas)\nAnaphoric(lilas)\nTricolor(aguste)\nEditorial(aguste)\nAnaphoric(aguste)\nUppity(dotti) -> Bedewed(dotti)\nforall x (Tricolor(x) -> Anaphoric(x))\nSkinny(aguste) -> Luxe(aguste)\nforall x (Tricolor(x) and Editorial(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nforall x (Editorial(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Anaphoric(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nBedewed(lilas) and Tricolor(lilas) -> Uppity(lilas)\nAnaphoric(dotti) and not Skinny(dotti) -> Luxe(dotti)\n\nnot Luxe(aguste)\n\nEditorial(aguste) and forall x (Editorial(x) -> Skinny(x)) -> therefore Skinny(aguste) Skinny(aguste) and Skinny(aguste) -> Luxe(aguste) -> therefore Luxe(aguste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Sinclare is not viewable. Sinclare is acherontic. Zaria is not unironed. Zaria is volatile. Zaria is lupine. Zaria is not disciform. Zaria is viewable. Tanney is lupine. Tanney is disciform. Tanney is viewable. If Sinclare is acherontic then Sinclare is unironed. If someone is lupine then they are viewable. If Tanney is caulked then Tanney is volatile. If someone is lupine and disciform then they are unironed. If someone is disciform then they are caulked. All viewable people are lupine. If Zaria is unironed and Zaria is lupine then Zaria is acherontic. If Sinclare is viewable and Sinclare is not caulked then Sinclare is volatile. Sinclare is not caulked.", "logic": "\nnot Viewable(sinclare)\nAcherontic(sinclare)\nnot Unironed(zaria)\nVolatile(zaria)\nLupine(zaria)\nnot Disciform(zaria)\nViewable(zaria)\nLupine(tanney)\nDisciform(tanney)\nViewable(tanney)\nAcherontic(sinclare) -> Unironed(sinclare)\nforall x (Lupine(x) -> Viewable(x))\nCaulked(tanney) -> Volatile(tanney)\nforall x (Lupine(x) and Disciform(x) -> Unironed(x))\nforall x (Disciform(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) -> Lupine(x))\nUnironed(zaria) and Lupine(zaria) -> Acherontic(zaria)\nViewable(sinclare) and not Caulked(sinclare) -> Volatile(sinclare)\n\nnot Caulked(sinclare)\n\nforall x (Disciform(x) -> Caulked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Perla is not placable. Perla is ninepenny. Christel is not unfrosted. Christel is superb. Christel is ropy. Christel is not drugless. Christel is placable. Ame is ropy. Ame is drugless. Ame is placable. If Perla is ninepenny then Perla is unfrosted. If someone is ropy then they are placable. If Ame is venereal then Ame is superb. If someone is ropy and drugless then they are unfrosted. If someone is drugless then they are venereal. All placable people are ropy. If Christel is unfrosted and Christel is ropy then Christel is ninepenny. If Perla is placable and Perla is not venereal then Perla is superb. Christel is venereal.", "logic": "\nnot Placable(perla)\nNinepenny(perla)\nnot Unfrosted(christel)\nSuperb(christel)\nRopy(christel)\nnot Drugless(christel)\nPlacable(christel)\nRopy(ame)\nDrugless(ame)\nPlacable(ame)\nNinepenny(perla) -> Unfrosted(perla)\nforall x (Ropy(x) -> Placable(x))\nVenereal(ame) -> Superb(ame)\nforall x (Ropy(x) and Drugless(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Venereal(x))\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Ropy(x))\nUnfrosted(christel) and Ropy(christel) -> Ninepenny(christel)\nPlacable(perla) and not Venereal(perla) -> Superb(perla)\n\nVenereal(christel)\n\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Venereal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Lainey is not pale. Lainey is grizzled. Neale is not stylized. Neale is moot. Neale is risible. Neale is not homeward. Neale is pale. Celestyna is risible. Celestyna is homeward. Celestyna is pale. If Lainey is grizzled then Lainey is stylized. If someone is risible then they are pale. If Celestyna is comical then Celestyna is moot. If someone is risible and homeward then they are stylized. If someone is homeward then they are comical. All pale people are risible. If Neale is stylized and Neale is risible then Neale is grizzled. If Lainey is pale and Lainey is not comical then Lainey is moot. Neale is not grizzled.", "logic": "\nnot Pale(lainey)\nGrizzled(lainey)\nnot Stylized(neale)\nMoot(neale)\nRisible(neale)\nnot Homeward(neale)\nPale(neale)\nRisible(celestyna)\nHomeward(celestyna)\nPale(celestyna)\nGrizzled(lainey) -> Stylized(lainey)\nforall x (Risible(x) -> Pale(x))\nComical(celestyna) -> Moot(celestyna)\nforall x (Risible(x) and Homeward(x) -> Stylized(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Comical(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) -> Risible(x))\nStylized(neale) and Risible(neale) -> Grizzled(neale)\nPale(lainey) and not Comical(lainey) -> Moot(lainey)\n\nnot Grizzled(neale)\n\nStylized(neale) and Risible(neale) -> Grizzled(neale) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "Spencer is not supporting. Spencer is leadless. Karlee is not formal. Karlee is bawdy. Karlee is holophytic. Karlee is not planted. Karlee is supporting. Ivy is holophytic. Ivy is planted. Ivy is supporting. If Spencer is leadless then Spencer is formal. If someone is holophytic then they are supporting. If Ivy is holophytic then Ivy is bawdy. If someone is holophytic and planted then they are formal. If someone is planted then they are holophytic. All supporting people are holophytic. If Karlee is formal and Karlee is holophytic then Karlee is leadless. If Spencer is supporting and Spencer is not holophytic then Spencer is bawdy. Spencer is planted.", "logic": "\nnot Supporting(spencer)\nLeadless(spencer)\nnot Formal(karlee)\nBawdy(karlee)\nHolophytic(karlee)\nnot Planted(karlee)\nSupporting(karlee)\nHolophytic(ivy)\nPlanted(ivy)\nSupporting(ivy)\nLeadless(spencer) -> Formal(spencer)\nforall x (Holophytic(x) -> Supporting(x))\nHolophytic(ivy) -> Bawdy(ivy)\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Planted(x) -> Formal(x))\nforall x (Planted(x) -> Holophytic(x))\nforall x (Supporting(x) -> Holophytic(x))\nFormal(karlee) and Holophytic(karlee) -> Leadless(karlee)\nSupporting(spencer) and not Holophytic(spencer) -> Bawdy(spencer)\n\nPlanted(spencer)\n\nPlanted(spencer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-464"} {"premises": "The georges is converted. The georges is beginning. The georges is desecrated. The georges footslog the sibley. The georges chink the sibley. The georges typify the sibley. The sibley is compulsory. The sibley is desecrated. The sibley chink the georges. The sibley typify the georges. If someone footslog the georges then they like the sibley. If the georges footslog the sibley and the sibley chink the georges then the georges typify the sibley. If someone typify the georges then they like the georges. The georges footslog the sibley.", "logic": "\nConverted(georges)\nBeginning(georges)\nDesecrated(georges)\nFootslog(georges, sibley)\nChink(georges, sibley)\nTypify(georges, sibley)\nCompulsory(sibley)\nDesecrated(sibley)\nChink(sibley, georges)\nTypify(sibley, georges)\nforall x (Footslog(x, georges) -> Footslog(x, sibley))\nFootslog(georges, sibley) and Chink(sibley, georges) -> Typify(georges, sibley)\nforall x (Typify(x, georges) -> Footslog(x, georges))\n\nFootslog(georges, sibley)\n\ntherefore Footslog(georges, sibley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The mohamed is insipid. The mohamed is surging. The mohamed is unexcited. The mohamed bond the sharlene. The mohamed change the sharlene. The mohamed trash the sharlene. The sharlene is maltese. The sharlene is unexcited. The sharlene change the mohamed. The sharlene trash the mohamed. If someone bond the mohamed then they like the sharlene. If the mohamed bond the sharlene and the sharlene change the mohamed then the mohamed trash the sharlene. If someone trash the mohamed then they like the mohamed. The mohamed is not unexcited.", "logic": "\nInsipid(mohamed)\nSurging(mohamed)\nUnexcited(mohamed)\nBond(mohamed, sharlene)\nChange(mohamed, sharlene)\nTrash(mohamed, sharlene)\nMaltese(sharlene)\nUnexcited(sharlene)\nChange(sharlene, mohamed)\nTrash(sharlene, mohamed)\nforall x (Bond(x, mohamed) -> Bond(x, sharlene))\nBond(mohamed, sharlene) and Change(sharlene, mohamed) -> Trash(mohamed, sharlene)\nforall x (Trash(x, mohamed) -> Bond(x, mohamed))\n\nnot Unexcited(mohamed)\n\ntherefore Unexcited(mohamed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The aloisia is turbinate. The aloisia is appeasing. The aloisia is monodical. The aloisia mislead the caroleen. The aloisia cere the caroleen. The aloisia fluoridise the caroleen. The caroleen is mystical. The caroleen is monodical. The caroleen cere the aloisia. The caroleen fluoridise the aloisia. If someone mislead the aloisia then they like the caroleen. If the aloisia mislead the caroleen and the caroleen cere the aloisia then the aloisia fluoridise the caroleen. If someone fluoridise the aloisia then they like the aloisia. The caroleen mislead the aloisia.", "logic": "\nTurbinate(aloisia)\nAppeasing(aloisia)\nMonodical(aloisia)\nMislead(aloisia, caroleen)\nCere(aloisia, caroleen)\nFluoridise(aloisia, caroleen)\nMystical(caroleen)\nMonodical(caroleen)\nCere(caroleen, aloisia)\nFluoridise(caroleen, aloisia)\nforall x (Mislead(x, aloisia) -> Mislead(x, caroleen))\nMislead(aloisia, caroleen) and Cere(caroleen, aloisia) -> Fluoridise(aloisia, caroleen)\nforall x (Fluoridise(x, aloisia) -> Mislead(x, aloisia))\n\nMislead(caroleen, aloisia)\n\nFluoridise(caroleen, aloisia) and forall x (Fluoridise(x, aloisia) -> Mislead(x, aloisia)) -> therefore Mislead(caroleen, aloisia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The mickie is platyrhine. The mickie is priestlike. The mickie is contorted. The mickie split the libbey. The mickie strike the libbey. The mickie adjure the libbey. The libbey is preferent. The libbey is contorted. The libbey strike the mickie. The libbey adjure the mickie. If someone split the mickie then they like the libbey. If the mickie split the libbey and the libbey strike the mickie then the mickie adjure the libbey. If someone adjure the mickie then they like the mickie. The libbey does not like the mickie.", "logic": "\nPlatyrhine(mickie)\nPriestlike(mickie)\nContorted(mickie)\nSplit(mickie, libbey)\nStrike(mickie, libbey)\nAdjure(mickie, libbey)\nPreferent(libbey)\nContorted(libbey)\nStrike(libbey, mickie)\nAdjure(libbey, mickie)\nforall x (Split(x, mickie) -> Split(x, libbey))\nSplit(mickie, libbey) and Strike(libbey, mickie) -> Adjure(mickie, libbey)\nforall x (Adjure(x, mickie) -> Split(x, mickie))\n\nnot Split(libbey, mickie)\n\nAdjure(libbey, mickie) and forall x (Adjure(x, mickie) -> Split(x, mickie)) -> therefore Split(libbey, mickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The melisse is saudi. The melisse is ventricous. The melisse is commensal. The melisse traduce the portia. The melisse recruit the portia. The melisse counter the portia. The portia is coequal. The portia is commensal. The portia recruit the melisse. The portia counter the melisse. If someone traduce the melisse then they like the portia. If the melisse traduce the portia and the portia recruit the melisse then the melisse counter the portia. If someone counter the melisse then they like the melisse. The portia traduce the portia.", "logic": "\nSaudi(melisse)\nVentricous(melisse)\nCommensal(melisse)\nTraduce(melisse, portia)\nRecruit(melisse, portia)\nCounter(melisse, portia)\nCoequal(portia)\nCommensal(portia)\nRecruit(portia, melisse)\nCounter(portia, melisse)\nforall x (Traduce(x, melisse) -> Traduce(x, portia))\nTraduce(melisse, portia) and Recruit(portia, melisse) -> Counter(melisse, portia)\nforall x (Counter(x, melisse) -> Traduce(x, melisse))\n\nTraduce(portia, portia)\n\nCounter(portia, melisse) and forall x (Counter(x, melisse) -> Traduce(x, melisse)) -> therefore Traduce(portia, melisse) Traduce(portia, melisse) and forall x (Traduce(x, melisse) -> Traduce(x, portia)) -> therefore Traduce(portia, portia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The armando is speakable. The armando is senescent. The armando is sticky. The armando plat the odie. The armando demonetize the odie. The armando stoop the odie. The odie is grumpy. The odie is sticky. The odie demonetize the armando. The odie stoop the armando. If someone plat the armando then they like the odie. If the armando plat the odie and the odie demonetize the armando then the armando stoop the odie. If someone stoop the armando then they like the armando. The odie does not like the odie.", "logic": "\nSpeakable(armando)\nSenescent(armando)\nSticky(armando)\nPlat(armando, odie)\nDemonetize(armando, odie)\nStoop(armando, odie)\nGrumpy(odie)\nSticky(odie)\nDemonetize(odie, armando)\nStoop(odie, armando)\nforall x (Plat(x, armando) -> Plat(x, odie))\nPlat(armando, odie) and Demonetize(odie, armando) -> Stoop(armando, odie)\nforall x (Stoop(x, armando) -> Plat(x, armando))\n\nnot Plat(odie, odie)\n\nStoop(odie, armando) and forall x (Stoop(x, armando) -> Plat(x, armando)) -> therefore Plat(odie, armando) Plat(odie, armando) and forall x (Plat(x, armando) -> Plat(x, odie)) -> therefore Plat(odie, odie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The teddie is myocardial. The teddie is venezuelan. The teddie is sonic. The teddie hazard the ryann. The teddie refracture the ryann. The teddie outcrop the ryann. The ryann is rambling. The ryann is sonic. The ryann refracture the teddie. The ryann outcrop the teddie. If someone hazard the teddie then they like the ryann. If the teddie hazard the ryann and the ryann refracture the teddie then the teddie outcrop the ryann. If someone outcrop the teddie then they like the teddie. The teddie does not like the teddie.", "logic": "\nMyocardial(teddie)\nVenezuelan(teddie)\nSonic(teddie)\nHazard(teddie, ryann)\nRefracture(teddie, ryann)\nOutcrop(teddie, ryann)\nRambling(ryann)\nSonic(ryann)\nRefracture(ryann, teddie)\nOutcrop(ryann, teddie)\nforall x (Hazard(x, teddie) -> Hazard(x, ryann))\nHazard(teddie, ryann) and Refracture(ryann, teddie) -> Outcrop(teddie, ryann)\nforall x (Outcrop(x, teddie) -> Hazard(x, teddie))\n\nnot Hazard(teddie, teddie)\n\nforall x (Outcrop(x, teddie) -> Hazard(x, teddie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The linnet is uncharted. The linnet is maltreated. The linnet is carousing. The linnet immure the rora. The linnet bulk the rora. The linnet straiten the rora. The rora is luxurious. The rora is carousing. The rora bulk the linnet. The rora straiten the linnet. If someone immure the linnet then they like the rora. If the linnet immure the rora and the rora bulk the linnet then the linnet straiten the rora. If someone straiten the linnet then they like the linnet. The linnet straiten the linnet.", "logic": "\nUncharted(linnet)\nMaltreated(linnet)\nCarousing(linnet)\nImmure(linnet, rora)\nBulk(linnet, rora)\nStraiten(linnet, rora)\nLuxurious(rora)\nCarousing(rora)\nBulk(rora, linnet)\nStraiten(rora, linnet)\nforall x (Immure(x, linnet) -> Immure(x, rora))\nImmure(linnet, rora) and Bulk(rora, linnet) -> Straiten(linnet, rora)\nforall x (Straiten(x, linnet) -> Immure(x, linnet))\n\nStraiten(linnet, linnet)\n\nStraiten(linnet, linnet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The sonnie is stalemated. The sonnie is combinable. The sonnie is flimsy. The sonnie distress the kaja. The sonnie factorise the kaja. The sonnie access the kaja. The kaja is unbooked. The kaja is flimsy. The kaja factorise the sonnie. The kaja access the sonnie. If someone distress the sonnie then they like the kaja. If the sonnie distress the kaja and the kaja factorise the sonnie then the sonnie access the kaja. If someone access the sonnie then they like the sonnie. The kaja does not visit the kaja.", "logic": "\nStalemated(sonnie)\nCombinable(sonnie)\nFlimsy(sonnie)\nDistress(sonnie, kaja)\nFactorise(sonnie, kaja)\nAccess(sonnie, kaja)\nUnbooked(kaja)\nFlimsy(kaja)\nFactorise(kaja, sonnie)\nAccess(kaja, sonnie)\nforall x (Distress(x, sonnie) -> Distress(x, kaja))\nDistress(sonnie, kaja) and Factorise(kaja, sonnie) -> Access(sonnie, kaja)\nforall x (Access(x, sonnie) -> Distress(x, sonnie))\n\nnot Access(kaja, kaja)\n\nnot Access(kaja, kaja) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The euclid is oscitant. The euclid is adagio. The euclid is violent. The euclid metallize the larine. The euclid grieve the larine. The euclid situate the larine. The larine is synoptic. The larine is violent. The larine grieve the euclid. The larine situate the euclid. If someone metallize the euclid then they like the larine. If the euclid metallize the larine and the larine grieve the euclid then the euclid situate the larine. If someone situate the euclid then they like the euclid. The larine grieve the larine.", "logic": "\nOscitant(euclid)\nAdagio(euclid)\nViolent(euclid)\nMetallize(euclid, larine)\nGrieve(euclid, larine)\nSituate(euclid, larine)\nSynoptic(larine)\nViolent(larine)\nGrieve(larine, euclid)\nSituate(larine, euclid)\nforall x (Metallize(x, euclid) -> Metallize(x, larine))\nMetallize(euclid, larine) and Grieve(larine, euclid) -> Situate(euclid, larine)\nforall x (Situate(x, euclid) -> Metallize(x, euclid))\n\nGrieve(larine, larine)\n\nGrieve(larine, larine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The elisabeth is satisfied. The elisabeth is cycloidal. The elisabeth is preeminent. The elisabeth hunger the ric. The elisabeth abscise the ric. The elisabeth madrigal the ric. The ric is compulsive. The ric is preeminent. The ric abscise the elisabeth. The ric madrigal the elisabeth. If someone hunger the elisabeth then they like the ric. If the elisabeth hunger the ric and the ric abscise the elisabeth then the elisabeth madrigal the ric. If someone madrigal the elisabeth then they like the elisabeth. The ric is not cycloidal.", "logic": "\nSatisfied(elisabeth)\nCycloidal(elisabeth)\nPreeminent(elisabeth)\nHunger(elisabeth, ric)\nAbscise(elisabeth, ric)\nMadrigal(elisabeth, ric)\nCompulsive(ric)\nPreeminent(ric)\nAbscise(ric, elisabeth)\nMadrigal(ric, elisabeth)\nforall x (Hunger(x, elisabeth) -> Hunger(x, ric))\nHunger(elisabeth, ric) and Abscise(ric, elisabeth) -> Madrigal(elisabeth, ric)\nforall x (Madrigal(x, elisabeth) -> Hunger(x, elisabeth))\n\nnot Cycloidal(ric)\n\nnot Cycloidal(ric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "The godwin is carinate. The godwin is podlike. The godwin is pragmatic. The godwin decolorise the hayward. The godwin summarise the hayward. The godwin digest the hayward. The hayward is comestible. The hayward is pragmatic. The hayward summarise the godwin. The hayward digest the godwin. If someone decolorise the godwin then they like the hayward. If the godwin decolorise the hayward and the hayward summarise the godwin then the godwin digest the hayward. If someone digest the godwin then they like the godwin. The hayward is kind.", "logic": "\nCarinate(godwin)\nPodlike(godwin)\nPragmatic(godwin)\nDecolorise(godwin, hayward)\nSummarise(godwin, hayward)\nDigest(godwin, hayward)\nComestible(hayward)\nPragmatic(hayward)\nSummarise(hayward, godwin)\nDigest(hayward, godwin)\nforall x (Decolorise(x, godwin) -> Decolorise(x, hayward))\nDecolorise(godwin, hayward) and Summarise(hayward, godwin) -> Digest(godwin, hayward)\nforall x (Digest(x, godwin) -> Decolorise(x, godwin))\n\nKind(hayward)\n\nKind(hayward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1294"} {"premises": "Amalie is unlimited. Stephani is unlimited. Stephani is separated. Channa is unlimited. Channa is decompound. Channa is separated. Julianne is observable. Julianne is unlimited. Julianne is separated. Julianne is unadjusted. If someone is separated then they are artful. If someone is unadjusted and artful then they are observable. All artful, unlimited people are observable. Stephani is separated.", "logic": "\nUnlimited(amalie)\nUnlimited(stephani)\nSeparated(stephani)\nUnlimited(channa)\nDecompound(channa)\nSeparated(channa)\nObservable(julianne)\nUnlimited(julianne)\nSeparated(julianne)\nUnadjusted(julianne)\nforall x (Separated(x) -> Artful(x))\nforall x (Unadjusted(x) and Artful(x) -> Observable(x))\nforall x (Artful(x) and Unlimited(x) -> Observable(x))\n\nSeparated(stephani)\n\ntherefore Separated(stephani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Cheryl is harmonical. Berta is harmonical. Berta is fogyish. Menard is harmonical. Menard is changing. Menard is fogyish. Marlin is dyspneal. Marlin is harmonical. Marlin is fogyish. Marlin is knobbed. If someone is fogyish then they are erring. If someone is knobbed and erring then they are dyspneal. All erring, harmonical people are dyspneal. Menard is not harmonical.", "logic": "\nHarmonical(cheryl)\nHarmonical(berta)\nFogyish(berta)\nHarmonical(menard)\nChanging(menard)\nFogyish(menard)\nDyspneal(marlin)\nHarmonical(marlin)\nFogyish(marlin)\nKnobbed(marlin)\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> Erring(x))\nforall x (Knobbed(x) and Erring(x) -> Dyspneal(x))\nforall x (Erring(x) and Harmonical(x) -> Dyspneal(x))\n\nnot Harmonical(menard)\n\ntherefore Harmonical(menard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Meaghan is adenoidal. Chas is adenoidal. Chas is amblyopic. Marylinda is adenoidal. Marylinda is prejudiced. Marylinda is amblyopic. Sallyann is monoclinic. Sallyann is adenoidal. Sallyann is amblyopic. Sallyann is conceptive. If someone is amblyopic then they are frail. If someone is conceptive and frail then they are monoclinic. All frail, adenoidal people are monoclinic. Sallyann is frail.", "logic": "\nAdenoidal(meaghan)\nAdenoidal(chas)\nAmblyopic(chas)\nAdenoidal(marylinda)\nPrejudiced(marylinda)\nAmblyopic(marylinda)\nMonoclinic(sallyann)\nAdenoidal(sallyann)\nAmblyopic(sallyann)\nConceptive(sallyann)\nforall x (Amblyopic(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Conceptive(x) and Frail(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Frail(x) and Adenoidal(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\n\nFrail(sallyann)\n\nAmblyopic(sallyann) and forall x (Amblyopic(x) -> Frail(x)) -> therefore Frail(sallyann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Zelda is conjoined. Forster is conjoined. Forster is arboriform. Laraine is conjoined. Laraine is shelled. Laraine is arboriform. Jyoti is bacterioid. Jyoti is conjoined. Jyoti is arboriform. Jyoti is vernal. If someone is arboriform then they are generous. If someone is vernal and generous then they are bacterioid. All generous, conjoined people are bacterioid. Jyoti is not generous.", "logic": "\nConjoined(zelda)\nConjoined(forster)\nArboriform(forster)\nConjoined(laraine)\nShelled(laraine)\nArboriform(laraine)\nBacterioid(jyoti)\nConjoined(jyoti)\nArboriform(jyoti)\nVernal(jyoti)\nforall x (Arboriform(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) and Generous(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) and Conjoined(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\n\nnot Generous(jyoti)\n\nArboriform(jyoti) and forall x (Arboriform(x) -> Generous(x)) -> therefore Generous(jyoti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Darrel is minuscular. Hartwell is minuscular. Hartwell is sickening. Winnifred is minuscular. Winnifred is acquired. Winnifred is sickening. Suzann is totemic. Suzann is minuscular. Suzann is sickening. Suzann is babylonian. If someone is sickening then they are multiphase. If someone is babylonian and multiphase then they are totemic. All multiphase, minuscular people are totemic. Hartwell is totemic.", "logic": "\nMinuscular(darrel)\nMinuscular(hartwell)\nSickening(hartwell)\nMinuscular(winnifred)\nAcquired(winnifred)\nSickening(winnifred)\nTotemic(suzann)\nMinuscular(suzann)\nSickening(suzann)\nBabylonian(suzann)\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Multiphase(x))\nforall x (Babylonian(x) and Multiphase(x) -> Totemic(x))\nforall x (Multiphase(x) and Minuscular(x) -> Totemic(x))\n\nTotemic(hartwell)\n\nSickening(hartwell) and forall x (Sickening(x) -> Multiphase(x)) -> therefore Multiphase(hartwell) Multiphase(hartwell) and Minuscular(hartwell) and forall x (Multiphase(x) and Minuscular(x) -> Totemic(x)) -> therefore Totemic(hartwell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Elwira is neutered. Phyllis is neutered. Phyllis is percussive. Mayda is neutered. Mayda is bearing. Mayda is percussive. Zilvia is insomniac. Zilvia is neutered. Zilvia is percussive. Zilvia is blackened. If someone is percussive then they are useful. If someone is blackened and useful then they are insomniac. All useful, neutered people are insomniac. Phyllis is not insomniac.", "logic": "\nNeutered(elwira)\nNeutered(phyllis)\nPercussive(phyllis)\nNeutered(mayda)\nBearing(mayda)\nPercussive(mayda)\nInsomniac(zilvia)\nNeutered(zilvia)\nPercussive(zilvia)\nBlackened(zilvia)\nforall x (Percussive(x) -> Useful(x))\nforall x (Blackened(x) and Useful(x) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Useful(x) and Neutered(x) -> Insomniac(x))\n\nnot Insomniac(phyllis)\n\nPercussive(phyllis) and forall x (Percussive(x) -> Useful(x)) -> therefore Useful(phyllis) Useful(phyllis) and Neutered(phyllis) and forall x (Useful(x) and Neutered(x) -> Insomniac(x)) -> therefore Insomniac(phyllis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Aguinaldo is looted. Daryle is looted. Daryle is inimical. Genni is looted. Genni is puzzling. Genni is inimical. Amadeus is deictic. Amadeus is looted. Amadeus is inimical. Amadeus is coeliac. If someone is inimical then they are rotted. If someone is coeliac and rotted then they are deictic. All rotted, looted people are deictic. Aguinaldo is not rotted.", "logic": "\nLooted(aguinaldo)\nLooted(daryle)\nInimical(daryle)\nLooted(genni)\nPuzzling(genni)\nInimical(genni)\nDeictic(amadeus)\nLooted(amadeus)\nInimical(amadeus)\nCoeliac(amadeus)\nforall x (Inimical(x) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) and Rotted(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Rotted(x) and Looted(x) -> Deictic(x))\n\nnot Rotted(aguinaldo)\n\nforall x (Inimical(x) -> Rotted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Paton is arboresque. Mufinella is arboresque. Mufinella is picaresque. Karlotta is arboresque. Karlotta is spikelike. Karlotta is picaresque. Izzi is popular. Izzi is arboresque. Izzi is picaresque. Izzi is unfair. If someone is picaresque then they are billion. If someone is unfair and billion then they are popular. All billion, arboresque people are popular. Paton is popular.", "logic": "\nArboresque(paton)\nArboresque(mufinella)\nPicaresque(mufinella)\nArboresque(karlotta)\nSpikelike(karlotta)\nPicaresque(karlotta)\nPopular(izzi)\nArboresque(izzi)\nPicaresque(izzi)\nUnfair(izzi)\nforall x (Picaresque(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Billion(x) -> Popular(x))\nforall x (Billion(x) and Arboresque(x) -> Popular(x))\n\nPopular(paton)\n\nforall x (Billion(x) and Arboresque(x) -> Popular(x)) <- forall x (Picaresque(x) -> Billion(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Shawna is chantlike. Hans is chantlike. Hans is potbound. Andee is chantlike. Andee is detested. Andee is potbound. Matthias is empurpled. Matthias is chantlike. Matthias is potbound. Matthias is adoptive. If someone is potbound then they are coseismic. If someone is adoptive and coseismic then they are empurpled. All coseismic, chantlike people are empurpled. Andee is not adoptive.", "logic": "\nChantlike(shawna)\nChantlike(hans)\nPotbound(hans)\nChantlike(andee)\nDetested(andee)\nPotbound(andee)\nEmpurpled(matthias)\nChantlike(matthias)\nPotbound(matthias)\nAdoptive(matthias)\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) and Coseismic(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) and Chantlike(x) -> Empurpled(x))\n\nnot Adoptive(andee)\n\nnot Adoptive(andee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Wendie is gregorian. Jermayne is gregorian. Jermayne is redeemable. Maxie is gregorian. Maxie is rococo. Maxie is redeemable. Garvey is columnar. Garvey is gregorian. Garvey is redeemable. Garvey is summative. If someone is redeemable then they are coastwise. If someone is summative and coastwise then they are columnar. All coastwise, gregorian people are columnar. Wendie is summative.", "logic": "\nGregorian(wendie)\nGregorian(jermayne)\nRedeemable(jermayne)\nGregorian(maxie)\nRococo(maxie)\nRedeemable(maxie)\nColumnar(garvey)\nGregorian(garvey)\nRedeemable(garvey)\nSummative(garvey)\nforall x (Redeemable(x) -> Coastwise(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) and Coastwise(x) -> Columnar(x))\nforall x (Coastwise(x) and Gregorian(x) -> Columnar(x))\n\nSummative(wendie)\n\nSummative(wendie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Auberta is capitulary. Durward is capitulary. Durward is guardant. Rajeev is capitulary. Rajeev is doctoral. Rajeev is guardant. Bess is barrelled. Bess is capitulary. Bess is guardant. Bess is garrulous. If someone is guardant then they are master. If someone is garrulous and master then they are barrelled. All master, capitulary people are barrelled. Bess is not doctoral.", "logic": "\nCapitulary(auberta)\nCapitulary(durward)\nGuardant(durward)\nCapitulary(rajeev)\nDoctoral(rajeev)\nGuardant(rajeev)\nBarrelled(bess)\nCapitulary(bess)\nGuardant(bess)\nGarrulous(bess)\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Master(x))\nforall x (Garrulous(x) and Master(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nforall x (Master(x) and Capitulary(x) -> Barrelled(x))\n\nnot Doctoral(bess)\n\nnot Doctoral(bess) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "Dahlia is beardless. Rutger is beardless. Rutger is unhearing. Bunni is beardless. Bunni is meaning. Bunni is unhearing. Jarrett is meagre. Jarrett is beardless. Jarrett is unhearing. Jarrett is ducal. If someone is unhearing then they are sneering. If someone is ducal and sneering then they are meagre. All sneering, beardless people are meagre. Rutger is white.", "logic": "\nBeardless(dahlia)\nBeardless(rutger)\nUnhearing(rutger)\nBeardless(bunni)\nMeaning(bunni)\nUnhearing(bunni)\nMeagre(jarrett)\nBeardless(jarrett)\nUnhearing(jarrett)\nDucal(jarrett)\nforall x (Unhearing(x) -> Sneering(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) and Sneering(x) -> Meagre(x))\nforall x (Sneering(x) and Beardless(x) -> Meagre(x))\n\nWhite(rutger)\n\nWhite(rutger) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-226"} {"premises": "The imelda is testate. The imelda promenade the nellie. The imelda bespot the nellie. The nellie is carbonous. The nellie is not azonal. The nellie promenade the imelda. The nellie bespot the imelda. If the nellie is abasic then the nellie bespot the imelda. If something bespot the nellie then the nellie bespot the imelda. If something promenade the nellie then the nellie is carbonous. If something mistrust the imelda and it is carbonous then the imelda mistrust the nellie. If the imelda promenade the nellie then the imelda does not need the nellie. If the imelda is testate and the imelda is azonal then the imelda does not visit the nellie. If the imelda is not carbonous then the imelda promenade the nellie. If something promenade the nellie and it does not need the nellie then it bespot the imelda. The nellie is not azonal.", "logic": "\nTestate(imelda)\nPromenade(imelda, nellie)\nBespot(imelda, nellie)\nCarbonous(nellie)\nnot Azonal(nellie)\nPromenade(nellie, imelda)\nBespot(nellie, imelda)\nAbasic(nellie) -> Bespot(nellie, imelda)\nforall x (Bespot(x, nellie) -> Bespot(nellie, imelda))\nforall x (Promenade(x, nellie) -> Carbonous(nellie))\nforall x (Mistrust(x, imelda) and Carbonous(x) -> Mistrust(imelda, nellie))\nPromenade(imelda, nellie) -> not Mistrust(imelda, nellie)\nTestate(imelda) and Azonal(imelda) -> not Bespot(imelda, nellie)\nnot Carbonous(imelda) -> Promenade(imelda, nellie)\nforall x (Promenade(x, nellie) and not Mistrust(x, nellie) -> Bespot(x, imelda))\n\nnot Azonal(nellie)\n\ntherefore not Azonal(nellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The kimmie is unary. The kimmie conciliate the sibylle. The kimmie retrieve the sibylle. The sibylle is oecumenic. The sibylle is not twiglike. The sibylle conciliate the kimmie. The sibylle retrieve the kimmie. If the sibylle is uncrowned then the sibylle retrieve the kimmie. If something retrieve the sibylle then the sibylle retrieve the kimmie. If something conciliate the sibylle then the sibylle is oecumenic. If something cloud the kimmie and it is oecumenic then the kimmie cloud the sibylle. If the kimmie conciliate the sibylle then the kimmie does not need the sibylle. If the kimmie is unary and the kimmie is twiglike then the kimmie does not visit the sibylle. If the kimmie is not oecumenic then the kimmie conciliate the sibylle. If something conciliate the sibylle and it does not need the sibylle then it retrieve the kimmie. The kimmie is not unary.", "logic": "\nUnary(kimmie)\nConciliate(kimmie, sibylle)\nRetrieve(kimmie, sibylle)\nOecumenic(sibylle)\nnot Twiglike(sibylle)\nConciliate(sibylle, kimmie)\nRetrieve(sibylle, kimmie)\nUncrowned(sibylle) -> Retrieve(sibylle, kimmie)\nforall x (Retrieve(x, sibylle) -> Retrieve(sibylle, kimmie))\nforall x (Conciliate(x, sibylle) -> Oecumenic(sibylle))\nforall x (Cloud(x, kimmie) and Oecumenic(x) -> Cloud(kimmie, sibylle))\nConciliate(kimmie, sibylle) -> not Cloud(kimmie, sibylle)\nUnary(kimmie) and Twiglike(kimmie) -> not Retrieve(kimmie, sibylle)\nnot Oecumenic(kimmie) -> Conciliate(kimmie, sibylle)\nforall x (Conciliate(x, sibylle) and not Cloud(x, sibylle) -> Retrieve(x, kimmie))\n\nnot Unary(kimmie)\n\ntherefore Unary(kimmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The walsh is austral. The walsh offsaddle the neile. The walsh narcotise the neile. The neile is theatrical. The neile is not garrulous. The neile offsaddle the walsh. The neile narcotise the walsh. If the neile is rimeless then the neile narcotise the walsh. If something narcotise the neile then the neile narcotise the walsh. If something offsaddle the neile then the neile is theatrical. If something fill the walsh and it is theatrical then the walsh fill the neile. If the walsh offsaddle the neile then the walsh does not need the neile. If the walsh is austral and the walsh is garrulous then the walsh does not visit the neile. If the walsh is not theatrical then the walsh offsaddle the neile. If something offsaddle the neile and it does not need the neile then it narcotise the walsh. The walsh does not need the neile.", "logic": "\nAustral(walsh)\nOffsaddle(walsh, neile)\nNarcotise(walsh, neile)\nTheatrical(neile)\nnot Garrulous(neile)\nOffsaddle(neile, walsh)\nNarcotise(neile, walsh)\nRimeless(neile) -> Narcotise(neile, walsh)\nforall x (Narcotise(x, neile) -> Narcotise(neile, walsh))\nforall x (Offsaddle(x, neile) -> Theatrical(neile))\nforall x (Fill(x, walsh) and Theatrical(x) -> Fill(walsh, neile))\nOffsaddle(walsh, neile) -> not Fill(walsh, neile)\nAustral(walsh) and Garrulous(walsh) -> not Narcotise(walsh, neile)\nnot Theatrical(walsh) -> Offsaddle(walsh, neile)\nforall x (Offsaddle(x, neile) and not Fill(x, neile) -> Narcotise(x, walsh))\n\nnot Fill(walsh, neile)\n\nOffsaddle(walsh, neile) and Offsaddle(walsh, neile) -> not Fill(walsh, neile) -> therefore not Fill(walsh, neile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The farra is overarm. The farra cocainise the alan. The farra excruciate the alan. The alan is gusseted. The alan is not unburied. The alan cocainise the farra. The alan excruciate the farra. If the alan is inedible then the alan excruciate the farra. If something excruciate the alan then the alan excruciate the farra. If something cocainise the alan then the alan is gusseted. If something venture the farra and it is gusseted then the farra venture the alan. If the farra cocainise the alan then the farra does not need the alan. If the farra is overarm and the farra is unburied then the farra does not visit the alan. If the farra is not gusseted then the farra cocainise the alan. If something cocainise the alan and it does not need the alan then it excruciate the farra. The farra venture the alan.", "logic": "\nOverarm(farra)\nCocainise(farra, alan)\nExcruciate(farra, alan)\nGusseted(alan)\nnot Unburied(alan)\nCocainise(alan, farra)\nExcruciate(alan, farra)\nInedible(alan) -> Excruciate(alan, farra)\nforall x (Excruciate(x, alan) -> Excruciate(alan, farra))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, alan) -> Gusseted(alan))\nforall x (Venture(x, farra) and Gusseted(x) -> Venture(farra, alan))\nCocainise(farra, alan) -> not Venture(farra, alan)\nOverarm(farra) and Unburied(farra) -> not Excruciate(farra, alan)\nnot Gusseted(farra) -> Cocainise(farra, alan)\nforall x (Cocainise(x, alan) and not Venture(x, alan) -> Excruciate(x, farra))\n\nVenture(farra, alan)\n\nCocainise(farra, alan) and Cocainise(farra, alan) -> not Venture(farra, alan) -> therefore not Venture(farra, alan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The mirella is pitted. The mirella burgle the kathryne. The mirella relapse the kathryne. The kathryne is perigonal. The kathryne is not biogenous. The kathryne burgle the mirella. The kathryne relapse the mirella. If the kathryne is primordial then the kathryne relapse the mirella. If something relapse the kathryne then the kathryne relapse the mirella. If something burgle the kathryne then the kathryne is perigonal. If something illume the mirella and it is perigonal then the mirella illume the kathryne. If the mirella burgle the kathryne then the mirella does not need the kathryne. If the mirella is pitted and the mirella is biogenous then the mirella does not visit the kathryne. If the mirella is not perigonal then the mirella burgle the kathryne. If something burgle the kathryne and it does not need the kathryne then it relapse the mirella. The mirella relapse the mirella.", "logic": "\nPitted(mirella)\nBurgle(mirella, kathryne)\nRelapse(mirella, kathryne)\nPerigonal(kathryne)\nnot Biogenous(kathryne)\nBurgle(kathryne, mirella)\nRelapse(kathryne, mirella)\nPrimordial(kathryne) -> Relapse(kathryne, mirella)\nforall x (Relapse(x, kathryne) -> Relapse(kathryne, mirella))\nforall x (Burgle(x, kathryne) -> Perigonal(kathryne))\nforall x (Illume(x, mirella) and Perigonal(x) -> Illume(mirella, kathryne))\nBurgle(mirella, kathryne) -> not Illume(mirella, kathryne)\nPitted(mirella) and Biogenous(mirella) -> not Relapse(mirella, kathryne)\nnot Perigonal(mirella) -> Burgle(mirella, kathryne)\nforall x (Burgle(x, kathryne) and not Illume(x, kathryne) -> Relapse(x, mirella))\n\nRelapse(mirella, mirella)\n\nBurgle(mirella, kathryne) and Burgle(mirella, kathryne) -> not Illume(mirella, kathryne) -> therefore not Illume(mirella, kathryne) Burgle(mirella, kathryne) and not Illume(mirella, kathryne) and forall x (Burgle(x, kathryne) and not Illume(x, kathryne) -> Relapse(x, mirella)) -> therefore Relapse(mirella, mirella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The elicia is humane. The elicia betoken the huntley. The elicia sanitate the huntley. The huntley is parenteral. The huntley is not smarmy. The huntley betoken the elicia. The huntley sanitate the elicia. If the huntley is bias then the huntley sanitate the elicia. If something sanitate the huntley then the huntley sanitate the elicia. If something betoken the huntley then the huntley is parenteral. If something collocate the elicia and it is parenteral then the elicia collocate the huntley. If the elicia betoken the huntley then the elicia does not need the huntley. If the elicia is humane and the elicia is smarmy then the elicia does not visit the huntley. If the elicia is not parenteral then the elicia betoken the huntley. If something betoken the huntley and it does not need the huntley then it sanitate the elicia. The elicia does not visit the elicia.", "logic": "\nHumane(elicia)\nBetoken(elicia, huntley)\nSanitate(elicia, huntley)\nParenteral(huntley)\nnot Smarmy(huntley)\nBetoken(huntley, elicia)\nSanitate(huntley, elicia)\nBias(huntley) -> Sanitate(huntley, elicia)\nforall x (Sanitate(x, huntley) -> Sanitate(huntley, elicia))\nforall x (Betoken(x, huntley) -> Parenteral(huntley))\nforall x (Collocate(x, elicia) and Parenteral(x) -> Collocate(elicia, huntley))\nBetoken(elicia, huntley) -> not Collocate(elicia, huntley)\nHumane(elicia) and Smarmy(elicia) -> not Sanitate(elicia, huntley)\nnot Parenteral(elicia) -> Betoken(elicia, huntley)\nforall x (Betoken(x, huntley) and not Collocate(x, huntley) -> Sanitate(x, elicia))\n\nnot Sanitate(elicia, elicia)\n\nBetoken(elicia, huntley) and Betoken(elicia, huntley) -> not Collocate(elicia, huntley) -> therefore not Collocate(elicia, huntley) Betoken(elicia, huntley) and not Collocate(elicia, huntley) and forall x (Betoken(x, huntley) and not Collocate(x, huntley) -> Sanitate(x, elicia)) -> therefore Sanitate(elicia, elicia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The alexander is atonic. The alexander refill the carmelita. The alexander ridicule the carmelita. The carmelita is swagger. The carmelita is not shocked. The carmelita refill the alexander. The carmelita ridicule the alexander. If the carmelita is trying then the carmelita ridicule the alexander. If something ridicule the carmelita then the carmelita ridicule the alexander. If something refill the carmelita then the carmelita is swagger. If something catalog the alexander and it is swagger then the alexander catalog the carmelita. If the alexander refill the carmelita then the alexander does not need the carmelita. If the alexander is atonic and the alexander is shocked then the alexander does not visit the carmelita. If the alexander is not swagger then the alexander refill the carmelita. If something refill the carmelita and it does not need the carmelita then it ridicule the alexander. The carmelita does not need the alexander.", "logic": "\nAtonic(alexander)\nRefill(alexander, carmelita)\nRidicule(alexander, carmelita)\nSwagger(carmelita)\nnot Shocked(carmelita)\nRefill(carmelita, alexander)\nRidicule(carmelita, alexander)\nTrying(carmelita) -> Ridicule(carmelita, alexander)\nforall x (Ridicule(x, carmelita) -> Ridicule(carmelita, alexander))\nforall x (Refill(x, carmelita) -> Swagger(carmelita))\nforall x (Catalog(x, alexander) and Swagger(x) -> Catalog(alexander, carmelita))\nRefill(alexander, carmelita) -> not Catalog(alexander, carmelita)\nAtonic(alexander) and Shocked(alexander) -> not Ridicule(alexander, carmelita)\nnot Swagger(alexander) -> Refill(alexander, carmelita)\nforall x (Refill(x, carmelita) and not Catalog(x, carmelita) -> Ridicule(x, alexander))\n\nnot Catalog(carmelita, alexander)\n\nnot Catalog(carmelita, alexander) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The bradly is nodular. The bradly revoke the evelina. The bradly hearken the evelina. The evelina is tagged. The evelina is not tottery. The evelina revoke the bradly. The evelina hearken the bradly. If the evelina is unjust then the evelina hearken the bradly. If something hearken the evelina then the evelina hearken the bradly. If something revoke the evelina then the evelina is tagged. If something lyophilise the bradly and it is tagged then the bradly lyophilise the evelina. If the bradly revoke the evelina then the bradly does not need the evelina. If the bradly is nodular and the bradly is tottery then the bradly does not visit the evelina. If the bradly is not tagged then the bradly revoke the evelina. If something revoke the evelina and it does not need the evelina then it hearken the bradly. The bradly is kind.", "logic": "\nNodular(bradly)\nRevoke(bradly, evelina)\nHearken(bradly, evelina)\nTagged(evelina)\nnot Tottery(evelina)\nRevoke(evelina, bradly)\nHearken(evelina, bradly)\nUnjust(evelina) -> Hearken(evelina, bradly)\nforall x (Hearken(x, evelina) -> Hearken(evelina, bradly))\nforall x (Revoke(x, evelina) -> Tagged(evelina))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, bradly) and Tagged(x) -> Lyophilise(bradly, evelina))\nRevoke(bradly, evelina) -> not Lyophilise(bradly, evelina)\nNodular(bradly) and Tottery(bradly) -> not Hearken(bradly, evelina)\nnot Tagged(bradly) -> Revoke(bradly, evelina)\nforall x (Revoke(x, evelina) and not Lyophilise(x, evelina) -> Hearken(x, bradly))\n\nKind(bradly)\n\nKind(bradly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The ruben is unicuspid. The ruben unpin the kym. The ruben amaze the kym. The kym is omnivorous. The kym is not symbiotic. The kym unpin the ruben. The kym amaze the ruben. If the kym is bribable then the kym amaze the ruben. If something amaze the kym then the kym amaze the ruben. If something unpin the kym then the kym is omnivorous. If something jingle the ruben and it is omnivorous then the ruben jingle the kym. If the ruben unpin the kym then the ruben does not need the kym. If the ruben is unicuspid and the ruben is symbiotic then the ruben does not visit the kym. If the ruben is not omnivorous then the ruben unpin the kym. If something unpin the kym and it does not need the kym then it amaze the ruben. The kym does not like the kym.", "logic": "\nUnicuspid(ruben)\nUnpin(ruben, kym)\nAmaze(ruben, kym)\nOmnivorous(kym)\nnot Symbiotic(kym)\nUnpin(kym, ruben)\nAmaze(kym, ruben)\nBribable(kym) -> Amaze(kym, ruben)\nforall x (Amaze(x, kym) -> Amaze(kym, ruben))\nforall x (Unpin(x, kym) -> Omnivorous(kym))\nforall x (Jingle(x, ruben) and Omnivorous(x) -> Jingle(ruben, kym))\nUnpin(ruben, kym) -> not Jingle(ruben, kym)\nUnicuspid(ruben) and Symbiotic(ruben) -> not Amaze(ruben, kym)\nnot Omnivorous(ruben) -> Unpin(ruben, kym)\nforall x (Unpin(x, kym) and not Jingle(x, kym) -> Amaze(x, ruben))\n\nnot Unpin(kym, kym)\n\nnot Unpin(kym, kym) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The samuel is mediatory. The samuel corner the tedda. The samuel egress the tedda. The tedda is assonant. The tedda is not erythroid. The tedda corner the samuel. The tedda egress the samuel. If the tedda is lyonnaise then the tedda egress the samuel. If something egress the tedda then the tedda egress the samuel. If something corner the tedda then the tedda is assonant. If something spread the samuel and it is assonant then the samuel spread the tedda. If the samuel corner the tedda then the samuel does not need the tedda. If the samuel is mediatory and the samuel is erythroid then the samuel does not visit the tedda. If the samuel is not assonant then the samuel corner the tedda. If something corner the tedda and it does not need the tedda then it egress the samuel. The tedda is mediatory.", "logic": "\nMediatory(samuel)\nCorner(samuel, tedda)\nEgress(samuel, tedda)\nAssonant(tedda)\nnot Erythroid(tedda)\nCorner(tedda, samuel)\nEgress(tedda, samuel)\nLyonnaise(tedda) -> Egress(tedda, samuel)\nforall x (Egress(x, tedda) -> Egress(tedda, samuel))\nforall x (Corner(x, tedda) -> Assonant(tedda))\nforall x (Spread(x, samuel) and Assonant(x) -> Spread(samuel, tedda))\nCorner(samuel, tedda) -> not Spread(samuel, tedda)\nMediatory(samuel) and Erythroid(samuel) -> not Egress(samuel, tedda)\nnot Assonant(samuel) -> Corner(samuel, tedda)\nforall x (Corner(x, tedda) and not Spread(x, tedda) -> Egress(x, samuel))\n\nMediatory(tedda)\n\nMediatory(tedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The parrnell is attired. The parrnell lance the marlon. The parrnell backhand the marlon. The marlon is tuscan. The marlon is not anarchic. The marlon lance the parrnell. The marlon backhand the parrnell. If the marlon is biaural then the marlon backhand the parrnell. If something backhand the marlon then the marlon backhand the parrnell. If something lance the marlon then the marlon is tuscan. If something becloud the parrnell and it is tuscan then the parrnell becloud the marlon. If the parrnell lance the marlon then the parrnell does not need the marlon. If the parrnell is attired and the parrnell is anarchic then the parrnell does not visit the marlon. If the parrnell is not tuscan then the parrnell lance the marlon. If something lance the marlon and it does not need the marlon then it backhand the parrnell. The parrnell is not tuscan.", "logic": "\nAttired(parrnell)\nLance(parrnell, marlon)\nBackhand(parrnell, marlon)\nTuscan(marlon)\nnot Anarchic(marlon)\nLance(marlon, parrnell)\nBackhand(marlon, parrnell)\nBiaural(marlon) -> Backhand(marlon, parrnell)\nforall x (Backhand(x, marlon) -> Backhand(marlon, parrnell))\nforall x (Lance(x, marlon) -> Tuscan(marlon))\nforall x (Becloud(x, parrnell) and Tuscan(x) -> Becloud(parrnell, marlon))\nLance(parrnell, marlon) -> not Becloud(parrnell, marlon)\nAttired(parrnell) and Anarchic(parrnell) -> not Backhand(parrnell, marlon)\nnot Tuscan(parrnell) -> Lance(parrnell, marlon)\nforall x (Lance(x, marlon) and not Becloud(x, marlon) -> Backhand(x, parrnell))\n\nnot Tuscan(parrnell)\n\nnot Tuscan(parrnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The thurston is plush. The thurston profit the myrta. The thurston singe the myrta. The myrta is silverish. The myrta is not aeonian. The myrta profit the thurston. The myrta singe the thurston. If the myrta is immoderate then the myrta singe the thurston. If something singe the myrta then the myrta singe the thurston. If something profit the myrta then the myrta is silverish. If something mortgage the thurston and it is silverish then the thurston mortgage the myrta. If the thurston profit the myrta then the thurston does not need the myrta. If the thurston is plush and the thurston is aeonian then the thurston does not visit the myrta. If the thurston is not silverish then the thurston profit the myrta. If something profit the myrta and it does not need the myrta then it singe the thurston. The myrta mortgage the myrta.", "logic": "\nPlush(thurston)\nProfit(thurston, myrta)\nSinge(thurston, myrta)\nSilverish(myrta)\nnot Aeonian(myrta)\nProfit(myrta, thurston)\nSinge(myrta, thurston)\nImmoderate(myrta) -> Singe(myrta, thurston)\nforall x (Singe(x, myrta) -> Singe(myrta, thurston))\nforall x (Profit(x, myrta) -> Silverish(myrta))\nforall x (Mortgage(x, thurston) and Silverish(x) -> Mortgage(thurston, myrta))\nProfit(thurston, myrta) -> not Mortgage(thurston, myrta)\nPlush(thurston) and Aeonian(thurston) -> not Singe(thurston, myrta)\nnot Silverish(thurston) -> Profit(thurston, myrta)\nforall x (Profit(x, myrta) and not Mortgage(x, myrta) -> Singe(x, thurston))\n\nMortgage(myrta, myrta)\n\nMortgage(myrta, myrta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1099"} {"premises": "The cybelle epitomise the marlo. The cybelle is not ciliate. The cybelle fleece the marlo. The cybelle does not visit the leopold. The marlo epitomise the cybelle. The marlo epitomise the leopold. The marlo is ciliate. The marlo is not opened. The marlo immobilize the cybelle. The marlo immobilize the leopold. The leopold epitomise the cybelle. The leopold is ciliate. The leopold is opened. The leopold is not equipoised. The leopold fleece the cybelle. If the cybelle does not need the marlo then the cybelle immobilize the marlo. If someone epitomise the cybelle and they are equipoised then the cybelle does not visit the marlo. If someone is equipoised then they visit the marlo. If someone fleece the cybelle and the cybelle does not eat the leopold then they do not visit the marlo. If someone epitomise the marlo then the marlo is equipoised. If someone epitomise the marlo and they are not opened then the marlo fleece the cybelle. The leopold fleece the cybelle.", "logic": "\nEpitomise(cybelle, marlo)\nnot Ciliate(cybelle)\nFleece(cybelle, marlo)\nnot Immobilize(cybelle, leopold)\nEpitomise(marlo, cybelle)\nEpitomise(marlo, leopold)\nCiliate(marlo)\nnot Opened(marlo)\nImmobilize(marlo, cybelle)\nImmobilize(marlo, leopold)\nEpitomise(leopold, cybelle)\nCiliate(leopold)\nOpened(leopold)\nnot Equipoised(leopold)\nFleece(leopold, cybelle)\nnot Fleece(cybelle, marlo) -> Immobilize(cybelle, marlo)\nforall x (Epitomise(x, cybelle) and Equipoised(x) -> not Immobilize(cybelle, marlo))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) -> Immobilize(x, marlo))\nforall x (Fleece(x, cybelle) and not Epitomise(cybelle, leopold) -> not Immobilize(x, marlo))\nforall x (Epitomise(x, marlo) -> Equipoised(marlo))\nforall x (Epitomise(x, marlo) and not Opened(x) -> Fleece(marlo, cybelle))\n\nFleece(leopold, cybelle)\n\ntherefore Fleece(leopold, cybelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The abel fodder the bonita. The abel is not cunning. The abel motley the bonita. The abel does not visit the georgena. The bonita fodder the abel. The bonita fodder the georgena. The bonita is cunning. The bonita is not byzantine. The bonita crane the abel. The bonita crane the georgena. The georgena fodder the abel. The georgena is cunning. The georgena is byzantine. The georgena is not antiblack. The georgena motley the abel. If the abel does not need the bonita then the abel crane the bonita. If someone fodder the abel and they are antiblack then the abel does not visit the bonita. If someone is antiblack then they visit the bonita. If someone motley the abel and the abel does not eat the georgena then they do not visit the bonita. If someone fodder the bonita then the bonita is antiblack. If someone fodder the bonita and they are not byzantine then the bonita motley the abel. The abel is cunning.", "logic": "\nFodder(abel, bonita)\nnot Cunning(abel)\nMotley(abel, bonita)\nnot Crane(abel, georgena)\nFodder(bonita, abel)\nFodder(bonita, georgena)\nCunning(bonita)\nnot Byzantine(bonita)\nCrane(bonita, abel)\nCrane(bonita, georgena)\nFodder(georgena, abel)\nCunning(georgena)\nByzantine(georgena)\nnot Antiblack(georgena)\nMotley(georgena, abel)\nnot Motley(abel, bonita) -> Crane(abel, bonita)\nforall x (Fodder(x, abel) and Antiblack(x) -> not Crane(abel, bonita))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Crane(x, bonita))\nforall x (Motley(x, abel) and not Fodder(abel, georgena) -> not Crane(x, bonita))\nforall x (Fodder(x, bonita) -> Antiblack(bonita))\nforall x (Fodder(x, bonita) and not Byzantine(x) -> Motley(bonita, abel))\n\nCunning(abel)\n\ntherefore not Cunning(abel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The pincas foster the caldwell. The pincas is not sunrise. The pincas concretize the caldwell. The pincas does not visit the konstanze. The caldwell foster the pincas. The caldwell foster the konstanze. The caldwell is sunrise. The caldwell is not barometric. The caldwell trash the pincas. The caldwell trash the konstanze. The konstanze foster the pincas. The konstanze is sunrise. The konstanze is barometric. The konstanze is not potable. The konstanze concretize the pincas. If the pincas does not need the caldwell then the pincas trash the caldwell. If someone foster the pincas and they are potable then the pincas does not visit the caldwell. If someone is potable then they visit the caldwell. If someone concretize the pincas and the pincas does not eat the konstanze then they do not visit the caldwell. If someone foster the caldwell then the caldwell is potable. If someone foster the caldwell and they are not barometric then the caldwell concretize the pincas. The caldwell is potable.", "logic": "\nFoster(pincas, caldwell)\nnot Sunrise(pincas)\nConcretize(pincas, caldwell)\nnot Trash(pincas, konstanze)\nFoster(caldwell, pincas)\nFoster(caldwell, konstanze)\nSunrise(caldwell)\nnot Barometric(caldwell)\nTrash(caldwell, pincas)\nTrash(caldwell, konstanze)\nFoster(konstanze, pincas)\nSunrise(konstanze)\nBarometric(konstanze)\nnot Potable(konstanze)\nConcretize(konstanze, pincas)\nnot Concretize(pincas, caldwell) -> Trash(pincas, caldwell)\nforall x (Foster(x, pincas) and Potable(x) -> not Trash(pincas, caldwell))\nforall x (Potable(x) -> Trash(x, caldwell))\nforall x (Concretize(x, pincas) and not Foster(pincas, konstanze) -> not Trash(x, caldwell))\nforall x (Foster(x, caldwell) -> Potable(caldwell))\nforall x (Foster(x, caldwell) and not Barometric(x) -> Concretize(caldwell, pincas))\n\nPotable(caldwell)\n\nFoster(pincas, caldwell) and forall x (Foster(x, caldwell) -> Potable(caldwell)) -> therefore Potable(caldwell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The giffie move the brendan. The giffie is not goddamn. The giffie hull the brendan. The giffie does not visit the lucienne. The brendan move the giffie. The brendan move the lucienne. The brendan is goddamn. The brendan is not parabolic. The brendan diversify the giffie. The brendan diversify the lucienne. The lucienne move the giffie. The lucienne is goddamn. The lucienne is parabolic. The lucienne is not geological. The lucienne hull the giffie. If the giffie does not need the brendan then the giffie diversify the brendan. If someone move the giffie and they are geological then the giffie does not visit the brendan. If someone is geological then they visit the brendan. If someone hull the giffie and the giffie does not eat the lucienne then they do not visit the brendan. If someone move the brendan then the brendan is geological. If someone move the brendan and they are not parabolic then the brendan hull the giffie. The brendan is not geological.", "logic": "\nMove(giffie, brendan)\nnot Goddamn(giffie)\nHull(giffie, brendan)\nnot Diversify(giffie, lucienne)\nMove(brendan, giffie)\nMove(brendan, lucienne)\nGoddamn(brendan)\nnot Parabolic(brendan)\nDiversify(brendan, giffie)\nDiversify(brendan, lucienne)\nMove(lucienne, giffie)\nGoddamn(lucienne)\nParabolic(lucienne)\nnot Geological(lucienne)\nHull(lucienne, giffie)\nnot Hull(giffie, brendan) -> Diversify(giffie, brendan)\nforall x (Move(x, giffie) and Geological(x) -> not Diversify(giffie, brendan))\nforall x (Geological(x) -> Diversify(x, brendan))\nforall x (Hull(x, giffie) and not Move(giffie, lucienne) -> not Diversify(x, brendan))\nforall x (Move(x, brendan) -> Geological(brendan))\nforall x (Move(x, brendan) and not Parabolic(x) -> Hull(brendan, giffie))\n\nnot Geological(brendan)\n\nMove(giffie, brendan) and forall x (Move(x, brendan) -> Geological(brendan)) -> therefore Geological(brendan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The farra honeymoon the gert. The farra is not neither. The farra disfigure the gert. The farra does not visit the urbanus. The gert honeymoon the farra. The gert honeymoon the urbanus. The gert is neither. The gert is not calcitic. The gert devitalize the farra. The gert devitalize the urbanus. The urbanus honeymoon the farra. The urbanus is neither. The urbanus is calcitic. The urbanus is not aboral. The urbanus disfigure the farra. If the farra does not need the gert then the farra devitalize the gert. If someone honeymoon the farra and they are aboral then the farra does not visit the gert. If someone is aboral then they visit the gert. If someone disfigure the farra and the farra does not eat the urbanus then they do not visit the gert. If someone honeymoon the gert then the gert is aboral. If someone honeymoon the gert and they are not calcitic then the gert disfigure the farra. The gert devitalize the gert.", "logic": "\nHoneymoon(farra, gert)\nnot Neither(farra)\nDisfigure(farra, gert)\nnot Devitalize(farra, urbanus)\nHoneymoon(gert, farra)\nHoneymoon(gert, urbanus)\nNeither(gert)\nnot Calcitic(gert)\nDevitalize(gert, farra)\nDevitalize(gert, urbanus)\nHoneymoon(urbanus, farra)\nNeither(urbanus)\nCalcitic(urbanus)\nnot Aboral(urbanus)\nDisfigure(urbanus, farra)\nnot Disfigure(farra, gert) -> Devitalize(farra, gert)\nforall x (Honeymoon(x, farra) and Aboral(x) -> not Devitalize(farra, gert))\nforall x (Aboral(x) -> Devitalize(x, gert))\nforall x (Disfigure(x, farra) and not Honeymoon(farra, urbanus) -> not Devitalize(x, gert))\nforall x (Honeymoon(x, gert) -> Aboral(gert))\nforall x (Honeymoon(x, gert) and not Calcitic(x) -> Disfigure(gert, farra))\n\nDevitalize(gert, gert)\n\nHoneymoon(farra, gert) and forall x (Honeymoon(x, gert) -> Aboral(gert)) -> therefore Aboral(gert) Aboral(gert) and forall x (Aboral(x) -> Devitalize(x, gert)) -> therefore Devitalize(gert, gert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The anatoly renegade the ivett. The anatoly is not nonopening. The anatoly improvise the ivett. The anatoly does not visit the cheri. The ivett renegade the anatoly. The ivett renegade the cheri. The ivett is nonopening. The ivett is not caseous. The ivett legalise the anatoly. The ivett legalise the cheri. The cheri renegade the anatoly. The cheri is nonopening. The cheri is caseous. The cheri is not queasy. The cheri improvise the anatoly. If the anatoly does not need the ivett then the anatoly legalise the ivett. If someone renegade the anatoly and they are queasy then the anatoly does not visit the ivett. If someone is queasy then they visit the ivett. If someone improvise the anatoly and the anatoly does not eat the cheri then they do not visit the ivett. If someone renegade the ivett then the ivett is queasy. If someone renegade the ivett and they are not caseous then the ivett improvise the anatoly. The ivett does not visit the ivett.", "logic": "\nRenegade(anatoly, ivett)\nnot Nonopening(anatoly)\nImprovise(anatoly, ivett)\nnot Legalise(anatoly, cheri)\nRenegade(ivett, anatoly)\nRenegade(ivett, cheri)\nNonopening(ivett)\nnot Caseous(ivett)\nLegalise(ivett, anatoly)\nLegalise(ivett, cheri)\nRenegade(cheri, anatoly)\nNonopening(cheri)\nCaseous(cheri)\nnot Queasy(cheri)\nImprovise(cheri, anatoly)\nnot Improvise(anatoly, ivett) -> Legalise(anatoly, ivett)\nforall x (Renegade(x, anatoly) and Queasy(x) -> not Legalise(anatoly, ivett))\nforall x (Queasy(x) -> Legalise(x, ivett))\nforall x (Improvise(x, anatoly) and not Renegade(anatoly, cheri) -> not Legalise(x, ivett))\nforall x (Renegade(x, ivett) -> Queasy(ivett))\nforall x (Renegade(x, ivett) and not Caseous(x) -> Improvise(ivett, anatoly))\n\nnot Legalise(ivett, ivett)\n\nRenegade(anatoly, ivett) and forall x (Renegade(x, ivett) -> Queasy(ivett)) -> therefore Queasy(ivett) Queasy(ivett) and forall x (Queasy(x) -> Legalise(x, ivett)) -> therefore Legalise(ivett, ivett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The willy squirm the derrin. The willy is not mucky. The willy disturb the derrin. The willy does not visit the morry. The derrin squirm the willy. The derrin squirm the morry. The derrin is mucky. The derrin is not loved. The derrin minify the willy. The derrin minify the morry. The morry squirm the willy. The morry is mucky. The morry is loved. The morry is not crumbly. The morry disturb the willy. If the willy does not need the derrin then the willy minify the derrin. If someone squirm the willy and they are crumbly then the willy does not visit the derrin. If someone is crumbly then they visit the derrin. If someone disturb the willy and the willy does not eat the morry then they do not visit the derrin. If someone squirm the derrin then the derrin is crumbly. If someone squirm the derrin and they are not loved then the derrin disturb the willy. The morry does not visit the derrin.", "logic": "\nSquirm(willy, derrin)\nnot Mucky(willy)\nDisturb(willy, derrin)\nnot Minify(willy, morry)\nSquirm(derrin, willy)\nSquirm(derrin, morry)\nMucky(derrin)\nnot Loved(derrin)\nMinify(derrin, willy)\nMinify(derrin, morry)\nSquirm(morry, willy)\nMucky(morry)\nLoved(morry)\nnot Crumbly(morry)\nDisturb(morry, willy)\nnot Disturb(willy, derrin) -> Minify(willy, derrin)\nforall x (Squirm(x, willy) and Crumbly(x) -> not Minify(willy, derrin))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Minify(x, derrin))\nforall x (Disturb(x, willy) and not Squirm(willy, morry) -> not Minify(x, derrin))\nforall x (Squirm(x, derrin) -> Crumbly(derrin))\nforall x (Squirm(x, derrin) and not Loved(x) -> Disturb(derrin, willy))\n\nnot Minify(morry, derrin)\n\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Minify(x, derrin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The augie shill the stephanus. The augie is not enlarged. The augie bulldog the stephanus. The augie does not visit the rebekah. The stephanus shill the augie. The stephanus shill the rebekah. The stephanus is enlarged. The stephanus is not oversewn. The stephanus overcloud the augie. The stephanus overcloud the rebekah. The rebekah shill the augie. The rebekah is enlarged. The rebekah is oversewn. The rebekah is not cereal. The rebekah bulldog the augie. If the augie does not need the stephanus then the augie overcloud the stephanus. If someone shill the augie and they are cereal then the augie does not visit the stephanus. If someone is cereal then they visit the stephanus. If someone bulldog the augie and the augie does not eat the rebekah then they do not visit the stephanus. If someone shill the stephanus then the stephanus is cereal. If someone shill the stephanus and they are not oversewn then the stephanus bulldog the augie. The stephanus bulldog the augie.", "logic": "\nShill(augie, stephanus)\nnot Enlarged(augie)\nBulldog(augie, stephanus)\nnot Overcloud(augie, rebekah)\nShill(stephanus, augie)\nShill(stephanus, rebekah)\nEnlarged(stephanus)\nnot Oversewn(stephanus)\nOvercloud(stephanus, augie)\nOvercloud(stephanus, rebekah)\nShill(rebekah, augie)\nEnlarged(rebekah)\nOversewn(rebekah)\nnot Cereal(rebekah)\nBulldog(rebekah, augie)\nnot Bulldog(augie, stephanus) -> Overcloud(augie, stephanus)\nforall x (Shill(x, augie) and Cereal(x) -> not Overcloud(augie, stephanus))\nforall x (Cereal(x) -> Overcloud(x, stephanus))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, augie) and not Shill(augie, rebekah) -> not Overcloud(x, stephanus))\nforall x (Shill(x, stephanus) -> Cereal(stephanus))\nforall x (Shill(x, stephanus) and not Oversewn(x) -> Bulldog(stephanus, augie))\n\nBulldog(stephanus, augie)\n\nforall x (Shill(x, stephanus) and not Oversewn(x) -> Bulldog(stephanus, augie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The damon dethrone the lissa. The damon is not consumable. The damon allow the lissa. The damon does not visit the chloris. The lissa dethrone the damon. The lissa dethrone the chloris. The lissa is consumable. The lissa is not uncleanly. The lissa keep the damon. The lissa keep the chloris. The chloris dethrone the damon. The chloris is consumable. The chloris is uncleanly. The chloris is not manifest. The chloris allow the damon. If the damon does not need the lissa then the damon keep the lissa. If someone dethrone the damon and they are manifest then the damon does not visit the lissa. If someone is manifest then they visit the lissa. If someone allow the damon and the damon does not eat the chloris then they do not visit the lissa. If someone dethrone the lissa then the lissa is manifest. If someone dethrone the lissa and they are not uncleanly then the lissa allow the damon. The damon is not manifest.", "logic": "\nDethrone(damon, lissa)\nnot Consumable(damon)\nAllow(damon, lissa)\nnot Keep(damon, chloris)\nDethrone(lissa, damon)\nDethrone(lissa, chloris)\nConsumable(lissa)\nnot Uncleanly(lissa)\nKeep(lissa, damon)\nKeep(lissa, chloris)\nDethrone(chloris, damon)\nConsumable(chloris)\nUncleanly(chloris)\nnot Manifest(chloris)\nAllow(chloris, damon)\nnot Allow(damon, lissa) -> Keep(damon, lissa)\nforall x (Dethrone(x, damon) and Manifest(x) -> not Keep(damon, lissa))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Keep(x, lissa))\nforall x (Allow(x, damon) and not Dethrone(damon, chloris) -> not Keep(x, lissa))\nforall x (Dethrone(x, lissa) -> Manifest(lissa))\nforall x (Dethrone(x, lissa) and not Uncleanly(x) -> Allow(lissa, damon))\n\nnot Manifest(damon)\n\nnot Manifest(damon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The catlaina shit the melisenda. The catlaina is not evaluative. The catlaina captivate the melisenda. The catlaina does not visit the trix. The melisenda shit the catlaina. The melisenda shit the trix. The melisenda is evaluative. The melisenda is not incident. The melisenda schedule the catlaina. The melisenda schedule the trix. The trix shit the catlaina. The trix is evaluative. The trix is incident. The trix is not flexible. The trix captivate the catlaina. If the catlaina does not need the melisenda then the catlaina schedule the melisenda. If someone shit the catlaina and they are flexible then the catlaina does not visit the melisenda. If someone is flexible then they visit the melisenda. If someone captivate the catlaina and the catlaina does not eat the trix then they do not visit the melisenda. If someone shit the melisenda then the melisenda is flexible. If someone shit the melisenda and they are not incident then the melisenda captivate the catlaina. The melisenda is green.", "logic": "\nShit(catlaina, melisenda)\nnot Evaluative(catlaina)\nCaptivate(catlaina, melisenda)\nnot Schedule(catlaina, trix)\nShit(melisenda, catlaina)\nShit(melisenda, trix)\nEvaluative(melisenda)\nnot Incident(melisenda)\nSchedule(melisenda, catlaina)\nSchedule(melisenda, trix)\nShit(trix, catlaina)\nEvaluative(trix)\nIncident(trix)\nnot Flexible(trix)\nCaptivate(trix, catlaina)\nnot Captivate(catlaina, melisenda) -> Schedule(catlaina, melisenda)\nforall x (Shit(x, catlaina) and Flexible(x) -> not Schedule(catlaina, melisenda))\nforall x (Flexible(x) -> Schedule(x, melisenda))\nforall x (Captivate(x, catlaina) and not Shit(catlaina, trix) -> not Schedule(x, melisenda))\nforall x (Shit(x, melisenda) -> Flexible(melisenda))\nforall x (Shit(x, melisenda) and not Incident(x) -> Captivate(melisenda, catlaina))\n\nGreen(melisenda)\n\nGreen(melisenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The armstrong harshen the cornelle. The armstrong is not grey. The armstrong succor the cornelle. The armstrong does not visit the dickie. The cornelle harshen the armstrong. The cornelle harshen the dickie. The cornelle is grey. The cornelle is not glycogenic. The cornelle dissipate the armstrong. The cornelle dissipate the dickie. The dickie harshen the armstrong. The dickie is grey. The dickie is glycogenic. The dickie is not prolonged. The dickie succor the armstrong. If the armstrong does not need the cornelle then the armstrong dissipate the cornelle. If someone harshen the armstrong and they are prolonged then the armstrong does not visit the cornelle. If someone is prolonged then they visit the cornelle. If someone succor the armstrong and the armstrong does not eat the dickie then they do not visit the cornelle. If someone harshen the cornelle then the cornelle is prolonged. If someone harshen the cornelle and they are not glycogenic then the cornelle succor the armstrong. The armstrong does not eat the armstrong.", "logic": "\nHarshen(armstrong, cornelle)\nnot Grey(armstrong)\nSuccor(armstrong, cornelle)\nnot Dissipate(armstrong, dickie)\nHarshen(cornelle, armstrong)\nHarshen(cornelle, dickie)\nGrey(cornelle)\nnot Glycogenic(cornelle)\nDissipate(cornelle, armstrong)\nDissipate(cornelle, dickie)\nHarshen(dickie, armstrong)\nGrey(dickie)\nGlycogenic(dickie)\nnot Prolonged(dickie)\nSuccor(dickie, armstrong)\nnot Succor(armstrong, cornelle) -> Dissipate(armstrong, cornelle)\nforall x (Harshen(x, armstrong) and Prolonged(x) -> not Dissipate(armstrong, cornelle))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) -> Dissipate(x, cornelle))\nforall x (Succor(x, armstrong) and not Harshen(armstrong, dickie) -> not Dissipate(x, cornelle))\nforall x (Harshen(x, cornelle) -> Prolonged(cornelle))\nforall x (Harshen(x, cornelle) and not Glycogenic(x) -> Succor(cornelle, armstrong))\n\nnot Harshen(armstrong, armstrong)\n\nnot Harshen(armstrong, armstrong) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "The trenton flirt the malia. The trenton is not antitypic. The trenton flight the malia. The trenton does not visit the yehudi. The malia flirt the trenton. The malia flirt the yehudi. The malia is antitypic. The malia is not flaming. The malia unsay the trenton. The malia unsay the yehudi. The yehudi flirt the trenton. The yehudi is antitypic. The yehudi is flaming. The yehudi is not equipt. The yehudi flight the trenton. If the trenton does not need the malia then the trenton unsay the malia. If someone flirt the trenton and they are equipt then the trenton does not visit the malia. If someone is equipt then they visit the malia. If someone flight the trenton and the trenton does not eat the yehudi then they do not visit the malia. If someone flirt the malia then the malia is equipt. If someone flirt the malia and they are not flaming then the malia flight the trenton. The trenton is red.", "logic": "\nFlirt(trenton, malia)\nnot Antitypic(trenton)\nFlight(trenton, malia)\nnot Unsay(trenton, yehudi)\nFlirt(malia, trenton)\nFlirt(malia, yehudi)\nAntitypic(malia)\nnot Flaming(malia)\nUnsay(malia, trenton)\nUnsay(malia, yehudi)\nFlirt(yehudi, trenton)\nAntitypic(yehudi)\nFlaming(yehudi)\nnot Equipt(yehudi)\nFlight(yehudi, trenton)\nnot Flight(trenton, malia) -> Unsay(trenton, malia)\nforall x (Flirt(x, trenton) and Equipt(x) -> not Unsay(trenton, malia))\nforall x (Equipt(x) -> Unsay(x, malia))\nforall x (Flight(x, trenton) and not Flirt(trenton, yehudi) -> not Unsay(x, malia))\nforall x (Flirt(x, malia) -> Equipt(malia))\nforall x (Flirt(x, malia) and not Flaming(x) -> Flight(malia, trenton))\n\nRed(trenton)\n\nRed(trenton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1743"} {"premises": "Willow is leathered. Willow is aimless. Willow is seeming. Willow is expendable. Willow is twoscore. Rhodie is leathered. Rhodie is aimless. Rhodie is seeming. Rhodie is deciphered. Rhodie is expendable. Rhodie is stock. Rhodie is twoscore. White things are expendable. Big things are stock. All twoscore, stock things are deciphered. Willow is expendable.", "logic": "\nLeathered(willow)\nAimless(willow)\nSeeming(willow)\nExpendable(willow)\nTwoscore(willow)\nLeathered(rhodie)\nAimless(rhodie)\nSeeming(rhodie)\nDeciphered(rhodie)\nExpendable(rhodie)\nStock(rhodie)\nTwoscore(rhodie)\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Leathered(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Twoscore(x) and Stock(x) -> Deciphered(x))\n\nExpendable(willow)\n\ntherefore Expendable(willow)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-295"} {"premises": "Ninnetta is stupid. Ninnetta is patronymic. Ninnetta is ungummed. Ninnetta is fueled. Ninnetta is trillion. Laetitia is stupid. Laetitia is patronymic. Laetitia is ungummed. Laetitia is uncertain. Laetitia is fueled. Laetitia is riotous. Laetitia is trillion. White things are fueled. Big things are riotous. All trillion, riotous things are uncertain. Laetitia is not stupid.", "logic": "\nStupid(ninnetta)\nPatronymic(ninnetta)\nUngummed(ninnetta)\nFueled(ninnetta)\nTrillion(ninnetta)\nStupid(laetitia)\nPatronymic(laetitia)\nUngummed(laetitia)\nUncertain(laetitia)\nFueled(laetitia)\nRiotous(laetitia)\nTrillion(laetitia)\nforall x (Trillion(x) -> Fueled(x))\nforall x (Stupid(x) -> Riotous(x))\nforall x (Trillion(x) and Riotous(x) -> Uncertain(x))\n\nnot Stupid(laetitia)\n\ntherefore Stupid(laetitia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-295"} {"premises": "Nessy is ruffianly. Nessy is prankish. Nessy is stodgy. Nessy is content. Nessy is useable. Sam is ruffianly. Sam is prankish. Sam is stodgy. Sam is electronic. Sam is content. Sam is atypical. Sam is useable. White things are content. Big things are atypical. All useable, atypical things are electronic. Nessy is atypical.", "logic": "\nRuffianly(nessy)\nPrankish(nessy)\nStodgy(nessy)\nContent(nessy)\nUseable(nessy)\nRuffianly(sam)\nPrankish(sam)\nStodgy(sam)\nElectronic(sam)\nContent(sam)\nAtypical(sam)\nUseable(sam)\nforall x (Useable(x) -> Content(x))\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) -> Atypical(x))\nforall x (Useable(x) and Atypical(x) -> Electronic(x))\n\nAtypical(nessy)\n\nRuffianly(nessy) and forall x (Ruffianly(x) -> Atypical(x)) -> therefore Atypical(nessy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-295"} {"premises": "Barr is impious. Barr is xxxi. Barr is played. Barr is donatist. Barr is bereft. Maddie is impious. Maddie is xxxi. Maddie is played. Maddie is tibial. Maddie is donatist. Maddie is lite. Maddie is bereft. White things are donatist. Big things are lite. All bereft, lite things are tibial. Barr is not lite.", "logic": "\nImpious(barr)\nXxxi(barr)\nPlayed(barr)\nDonatist(barr)\nBereft(barr)\nImpious(maddie)\nXxxi(maddie)\nPlayed(maddie)\nTibial(maddie)\nDonatist(maddie)\nLite(maddie)\nBereft(maddie)\nforall x (Bereft(x) -> Donatist(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Bereft(x) and Lite(x) -> Tibial(x))\n\nnot Lite(barr)\n\nImpious(barr) and forall x (Impious(x) -> Lite(x)) -> therefore Lite(barr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-295"} {"premises": "Sherie is quasi. Sherie is besotted. Sherie is absurd. Sherie is legitimate. Sherie is utterable. Prunella is quasi. Prunella is besotted. Prunella is absurd. Prunella is legion. Prunella is legitimate. Prunella is inducive. Prunella is utterable. White things are legitimate. Big things are inducive. All utterable, inducive things are legion. Sherie is legion.", "logic": "\nQuasi(sherie)\nBesotted(sherie)\nAbsurd(sherie)\nLegitimate(sherie)\nUtterable(sherie)\nQuasi(prunella)\nBesotted(prunella)\nAbsurd(prunella)\nLegion(prunella)\nLegitimate(prunella)\nInducive(prunella)\nUtterable(prunella)\nforall x (Utterable(x) -> Legitimate(x))\nforall x (Quasi(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Utterable(x) and Inducive(x) -> Legion(x))\n\nLegion(sherie)\n\nQuasi(sherie) and forall x (Quasi(x) -> Inducive(x)) -> therefore Inducive(sherie) Utterable(sherie) and Inducive(sherie) and forall x (Utterable(x) and Inducive(x) -> Legion(x)) -> therefore Legion(sherie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-295"} {"premises": "Xenia is exothermic. Xenia is extant. Xenia is lissome. Xenia is unsheared. Xenia is exacting. Bennet is exothermic. Bennet is extant. Bennet is lissome. Bennet is cloggy. Bennet is unsheared. Bennet is jesting. Bennet is exacting. White things are unsheared. Big things are jesting. All exacting, jesting things are cloggy. Xenia is not cloggy.", "logic": "\nExothermic(xenia)\nExtant(xenia)\nLissome(xenia)\nUnsheared(xenia)\nExacting(xenia)\nExothermic(bennet)\nExtant(bennet)\nLissome(bennet)\nCloggy(bennet)\nUnsheared(bennet)\nJesting(bennet)\nExacting(bennet)\nforall x (Exacting(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Exothermic(x) -> Jesting(x))\nforall x (Exacting(x) and Jesting(x) -> Cloggy(x))\n\nnot Cloggy(xenia)\n\nExothermic(xenia) and forall x (Exothermic(x) -> Jesting(x)) -> therefore Jesting(xenia) Exacting(xenia) and Jesting(xenia) and forall x (Exacting(x) and Jesting(x) -> Cloggy(x)) -> therefore Cloggy(xenia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-295"} {"premises": "The allen is crabwise. The allen snag the cristen. The allen tissue the miran. The cristen is agile. The cristen vomit the mildrid. The miran snag the mildrid. The miran vomit the allen. The mildrid is callous. The mildrid snag the cristen. The mildrid tissue the allen. If someone snag the miran then the miran is callous. If someone snag the cristen and they are callous then the cristen is awnless. If someone is awnless then they visit the miran. The miran snag the mildrid.", "logic": "\nCrabwise(allen)\nSnag(allen, cristen)\nTissue(allen, miran)\nAgile(cristen)\nVomit(cristen, mildrid)\nSnag(miran, mildrid)\nVomit(miran, allen)\nCallous(mildrid)\nSnag(mildrid, cristen)\nTissue(mildrid, allen)\nforall x (Snag(x, miran) -> Callous(miran))\nforall x (Snag(x, cristen) and Callous(x) -> Awnless(cristen))\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Tissue(x, miran))\n\nSnag(miran, mildrid)\n\ntherefore Snag(miran, mildrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The carmel is distaff. The carmel stomach the walt. The carmel glaze the lynnet. The walt is conjoint. The walt fertilise the ezekiel. The lynnet stomach the ezekiel. The lynnet fertilise the carmel. The ezekiel is lactogenic. The ezekiel stomach the walt. The ezekiel glaze the carmel. If someone stomach the lynnet then the lynnet is lactogenic. If someone stomach the walt and they are lactogenic then the walt is disgusted. If someone is disgusted then they visit the lynnet. The carmel does not visit the lynnet.", "logic": "\nDistaff(carmel)\nStomach(carmel, walt)\nGlaze(carmel, lynnet)\nConjoint(walt)\nFertilise(walt, ezekiel)\nStomach(lynnet, ezekiel)\nFertilise(lynnet, carmel)\nLactogenic(ezekiel)\nStomach(ezekiel, walt)\nGlaze(ezekiel, carmel)\nforall x (Stomach(x, lynnet) -> Lactogenic(lynnet))\nforall x (Stomach(x, walt) and Lactogenic(x) -> Disgusted(walt))\nforall x (Disgusted(x) -> Glaze(x, lynnet))\n\nnot Glaze(carmel, lynnet)\n\ntherefore Glaze(carmel, lynnet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The morgan is priggish. The morgan masquerade the nitin. The morgan censor the zebulen. The nitin is detersive. The nitin backslap the willi. The zebulen masquerade the willi. The zebulen backslap the morgan. The willi is liberal. The willi masquerade the nitin. The willi censor the morgan. If someone masquerade the zebulen then the zebulen is liberal. If someone masquerade the nitin and they are liberal then the nitin is mundane. If someone is mundane then they visit the zebulen. The nitin is mundane.", "logic": "\nPriggish(morgan)\nMasquerade(morgan, nitin)\nCensor(morgan, zebulen)\nDetersive(nitin)\nBackslap(nitin, willi)\nMasquerade(zebulen, willi)\nBackslap(zebulen, morgan)\nLiberal(willi)\nMasquerade(willi, nitin)\nCensor(willi, morgan)\nforall x (Masquerade(x, zebulen) -> Liberal(zebulen))\nforall x (Masquerade(x, nitin) and Liberal(x) -> Mundane(nitin))\nforall x (Mundane(x) -> Censor(x, zebulen))\n\nMundane(nitin)\n\nMasquerade(willi, nitin) and Liberal(willi) and forall x (Masquerade(x, nitin) and Liberal(x) -> Mundane(nitin)) -> therefore Mundane(nitin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The sarina is bungling. The sarina mismate the giana. The sarina neutralize the emil. The giana is warning. The giana describe the celestyna. The emil mismate the celestyna. The emil describe the sarina. The celestyna is metastatic. The celestyna mismate the giana. The celestyna neutralize the sarina. If someone mismate the emil then the emil is metastatic. If someone mismate the giana and they are metastatic then the giana is wilsonian. If someone is wilsonian then they visit the emil. The giana is not wilsonian.", "logic": "\nBungling(sarina)\nMismate(sarina, giana)\nNeutralize(sarina, emil)\nWarning(giana)\nDescribe(giana, celestyna)\nMismate(emil, celestyna)\nDescribe(emil, sarina)\nMetastatic(celestyna)\nMismate(celestyna, giana)\nNeutralize(celestyna, sarina)\nforall x (Mismate(x, emil) -> Metastatic(emil))\nforall x (Mismate(x, giana) and Metastatic(x) -> Wilsonian(giana))\nforall x (Wilsonian(x) -> Neutralize(x, emil))\n\nnot Wilsonian(giana)\n\nMismate(celestyna, giana) and Metastatic(celestyna) and forall x (Mismate(x, giana) and Metastatic(x) -> Wilsonian(giana)) -> therefore Wilsonian(giana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The sapphire is fell. The sapphire sizzle the ruddy. The sapphire canoe the davidson. The ruddy is yemeni. The ruddy deluge the albertine. The davidson sizzle the albertine. The davidson deluge the sapphire. The albertine is prosy. The albertine sizzle the ruddy. The albertine canoe the sapphire. If someone sizzle the davidson then the davidson is prosy. If someone sizzle the ruddy and they are prosy then the ruddy is weathered. If someone is weathered then they visit the davidson. The ruddy canoe the davidson.", "logic": "\nFell(sapphire)\nSizzle(sapphire, ruddy)\nCanoe(sapphire, davidson)\nYemeni(ruddy)\nDeluge(ruddy, albertine)\nSizzle(davidson, albertine)\nDeluge(davidson, sapphire)\nProsy(albertine)\nSizzle(albertine, ruddy)\nCanoe(albertine, sapphire)\nforall x (Sizzle(x, davidson) -> Prosy(davidson))\nforall x (Sizzle(x, ruddy) and Prosy(x) -> Weathered(ruddy))\nforall x (Weathered(x) -> Canoe(x, davidson))\n\nCanoe(ruddy, davidson)\n\nSizzle(albertine, ruddy) and Prosy(albertine) and forall x (Sizzle(x, ruddy) and Prosy(x) -> Weathered(ruddy)) -> therefore Weathered(ruddy) Weathered(ruddy) and forall x (Weathered(x) -> Canoe(x, davidson)) -> therefore Canoe(ruddy, davidson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The amandi is needless. The amandi overrate the tedmund. The amandi seine the glyn. The tedmund is beery. The tedmund crap the mariele. The glyn overrate the mariele. The glyn crap the amandi. The mariele is collateral. The mariele overrate the tedmund. The mariele seine the amandi. If someone overrate the glyn then the glyn is collateral. If someone overrate the tedmund and they are collateral then the tedmund is autoerotic. If someone is autoerotic then they visit the glyn. The tedmund does not visit the glyn.", "logic": "\nNeedless(amandi)\nOverrate(amandi, tedmund)\nSeine(amandi, glyn)\nBeery(tedmund)\nCrap(tedmund, mariele)\nOverrate(glyn, mariele)\nCrap(glyn, amandi)\nCollateral(mariele)\nOverrate(mariele, tedmund)\nSeine(mariele, amandi)\nforall x (Overrate(x, glyn) -> Collateral(glyn))\nforall x (Overrate(x, tedmund) and Collateral(x) -> Autoerotic(tedmund))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Seine(x, glyn))\n\nnot Seine(tedmund, glyn)\n\nOverrate(mariele, tedmund) and Collateral(mariele) and forall x (Overrate(x, tedmund) and Collateral(x) -> Autoerotic(tedmund)) -> therefore Autoerotic(tedmund) Autoerotic(tedmund) and forall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Seine(x, glyn)) -> therefore Seine(tedmund, glyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The brina is endogamic. The brina spiral the modesta. The brina forgive the lyndsay. The modesta is idealised. The modesta excite the petronia. The lyndsay spiral the petronia. The lyndsay excite the brina. The petronia is wonderful. The petronia spiral the modesta. The petronia forgive the brina. If someone spiral the lyndsay then the lyndsay is wonderful. If someone spiral the modesta and they are wonderful then the modesta is dyspnoeal. If someone is dyspnoeal then they visit the lyndsay. The petronia does not visit the lyndsay.", "logic": "\nEndogamic(brina)\nSpiral(brina, modesta)\nForgive(brina, lyndsay)\nIdealised(modesta)\nExcite(modesta, petronia)\nSpiral(lyndsay, petronia)\nExcite(lyndsay, brina)\nWonderful(petronia)\nSpiral(petronia, modesta)\nForgive(petronia, brina)\nforall x (Spiral(x, lyndsay) -> Wonderful(lyndsay))\nforall x (Spiral(x, modesta) and Wonderful(x) -> Dyspnoeal(modesta))\nforall x (Dyspnoeal(x) -> Forgive(x, lyndsay))\n\nnot Forgive(petronia, lyndsay)\n\nforall x (Dyspnoeal(x) -> Forgive(x, lyndsay)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The alison is ropy. The alison realign the lani. The alison resole the abbey. The lani is butch. The lani skimcoat the gwennie. The abbey realign the gwennie. The abbey skimcoat the alison. The gwennie is contagious. The gwennie realign the lani. The gwennie resole the alison. If someone realign the abbey then the abbey is contagious. If someone realign the lani and they are contagious then the lani is gratified. If someone is gratified then they visit the abbey. The abbey resole the abbey.", "logic": "\nRopy(alison)\nRealign(alison, lani)\nResole(alison, abbey)\nButch(lani)\nSkimcoat(lani, gwennie)\nRealign(abbey, gwennie)\nSkimcoat(abbey, alison)\nContagious(gwennie)\nRealign(gwennie, lani)\nResole(gwennie, alison)\nforall x (Realign(x, abbey) -> Contagious(abbey))\nforall x (Realign(x, lani) and Contagious(x) -> Gratified(lani))\nforall x (Gratified(x) -> Resole(x, abbey))\n\nResole(abbey, abbey)\n\nforall x (Gratified(x) -> Resole(x, abbey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The verla is flamboyant. The verla harshen the claudius. The verla deprive the selene. The claudius is drowsy. The claudius stand the winthrop. The selene harshen the winthrop. The selene stand the verla. The winthrop is pentatonic. The winthrop harshen the claudius. The winthrop deprive the verla. If someone harshen the selene then the selene is pentatonic. If someone harshen the claudius and they are pentatonic then the claudius is bloodshot. If someone is bloodshot then they visit the selene. The selene is not pentatonic.", "logic": "\nFlamboyant(verla)\nHarshen(verla, claudius)\nDeprive(verla, selene)\nDrowsy(claudius)\nStand(claudius, winthrop)\nHarshen(selene, winthrop)\nStand(selene, verla)\nPentatonic(winthrop)\nHarshen(winthrop, claudius)\nDeprive(winthrop, verla)\nforall x (Harshen(x, selene) -> Pentatonic(selene))\nforall x (Harshen(x, claudius) and Pentatonic(x) -> Bloodshot(claudius))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Deprive(x, selene))\n\nnot Pentatonic(selene)\n\nforall x (Harshen(x, selene) -> Pentatonic(selene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The steward is cyprian. The steward numerate the allan. The steward affix the lee. The allan is slummy. The allan intermix the miranda. The lee numerate the miranda. The lee intermix the steward. The miranda is analyzable. The miranda numerate the allan. The miranda affix the steward. If someone numerate the lee then the lee is analyzable. If someone numerate the allan and they are analyzable then the allan is expository. If someone is expository then they visit the lee. The miranda numerate the miranda.", "logic": "\nCyprian(steward)\nNumerate(steward, allan)\nAffix(steward, lee)\nSlummy(allan)\nIntermix(allan, miranda)\nNumerate(lee, miranda)\nIntermix(lee, steward)\nAnalyzable(miranda)\nNumerate(miranda, allan)\nAffix(miranda, steward)\nforall x (Numerate(x, lee) -> Analyzable(lee))\nforall x (Numerate(x, allan) and Analyzable(x) -> Expository(allan))\nforall x (Expository(x) -> Affix(x, lee))\n\nNumerate(miranda, miranda)\n\nNumerate(miranda, miranda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The janeta is coastal. The janeta anagram the aubrette. The janeta fumigate the dione. The aubrette is cypriot. The aubrette resorb the karlen. The dione anagram the karlen. The dione resorb the janeta. The karlen is vincible. The karlen anagram the aubrette. The karlen fumigate the janeta. If someone anagram the dione then the dione is vincible. If someone anagram the aubrette and they are vincible then the aubrette is sandpapery. If someone is sandpapery then they visit the dione. The janeta does not need the karlen.", "logic": "\nCoastal(janeta)\nAnagram(janeta, aubrette)\nFumigate(janeta, dione)\nCypriot(aubrette)\nResorb(aubrette, karlen)\nAnagram(dione, karlen)\nResorb(dione, janeta)\nVincible(karlen)\nAnagram(karlen, aubrette)\nFumigate(karlen, janeta)\nforall x (Anagram(x, dione) -> Vincible(dione))\nforall x (Anagram(x, aubrette) and Vincible(x) -> Sandpapery(aubrette))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Fumigate(x, dione))\n\nnot Resorb(janeta, karlen)\n\nnot Resorb(janeta, karlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The thibaud is volant. The thibaud snag the piggy. The thibaud besiege the lynea. The piggy is ferocious. The piggy solemnize the eddie. The lynea snag the eddie. The lynea solemnize the thibaud. The eddie is vivid. The eddie snag the piggy. The eddie besiege the thibaud. If someone snag the lynea then the lynea is vivid. If someone snag the piggy and they are vivid then the piggy is invertible. If someone is invertible then they visit the lynea. The piggy is vivid.", "logic": "\nVolant(thibaud)\nSnag(thibaud, piggy)\nBesiege(thibaud, lynea)\nFerocious(piggy)\nSolemnize(piggy, eddie)\nSnag(lynea, eddie)\nSolemnize(lynea, thibaud)\nVivid(eddie)\nSnag(eddie, piggy)\nBesiege(eddie, thibaud)\nforall x (Snag(x, lynea) -> Vivid(lynea))\nforall x (Snag(x, piggy) and Vivid(x) -> Invertible(piggy))\nforall x (Invertible(x) -> Besiege(x, lynea))\n\nVivid(piggy)\n\nVivid(piggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-848"} {"premises": "The carlen repudiate the norry. The carlen palaver the norry. The norry demand the carlen. All jain things are not carved. If something demand the norry and it is not untended then it is carved. If something is untended then it palaver the carlen. If the norry repudiate the carlen and the norry is not jain then the norry does not eat the carlen. If the carlen repudiate the norry then the carlen is jain. If something demand the carlen and it does not visit the carlen then the carlen palaver the norry. If something demand the carlen then the carlen palaver the norry. If something palaver the carlen then the carlen does not visit the norry. The carlen palaver the norry.", "logic": "\nRepudiate(carlen, norry)\nPalaver(carlen, norry)\nDemand(norry, carlen)\nforall x (Jain(x) -> not Carved(x))\nforall x (Demand(x, norry) and not Untended(x) -> Carved(x))\nforall x (Untended(x) -> Palaver(x, carlen))\nRepudiate(norry, carlen) and not Jain(norry) -> not Demand(norry, carlen)\nRepudiate(carlen, norry) -> Jain(carlen)\nforall x (Demand(x, carlen) and not Palaver(x, carlen) -> Palaver(carlen, norry))\nforall x (Demand(x, carlen) -> Palaver(carlen, norry))\nforall x (Palaver(x, carlen) -> not Palaver(carlen, norry))\n\nPalaver(carlen, norry)\n\ntherefore Palaver(carlen, norry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The clement leach the matilde. The clement devilize the matilde. The matilde clitter the clement. All furlike things are not alarmed. If something clitter the matilde and it is not prudential then it is alarmed. If something is prudential then it devilize the clement. If the matilde leach the clement and the matilde is not furlike then the matilde does not eat the clement. If the clement leach the matilde then the clement is furlike. If something clitter the clement and it does not visit the clement then the clement devilize the matilde. If something clitter the clement then the clement devilize the matilde. If something devilize the clement then the clement does not visit the matilde. The clement does not need the matilde.", "logic": "\nLeach(clement, matilde)\nDevilize(clement, matilde)\nClitter(matilde, clement)\nforall x (Furlike(x) -> not Alarmed(x))\nforall x (Clitter(x, matilde) and not Prudential(x) -> Alarmed(x))\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> Devilize(x, clement))\nLeach(matilde, clement) and not Furlike(matilde) -> not Clitter(matilde, clement)\nLeach(clement, matilde) -> Furlike(clement)\nforall x (Clitter(x, clement) and not Devilize(x, clement) -> Devilize(clement, matilde))\nforall x (Clitter(x, clement) -> Devilize(clement, matilde))\nforall x (Devilize(x, clement) -> not Devilize(clement, matilde))\n\nnot Leach(clement, matilde)\n\ntherefore Leach(clement, matilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The neala discourage the barbie. The neala wane the barbie. The barbie bedeck the neala. All crackers things are not cycloidal. If something bedeck the barbie and it is not sunset then it is cycloidal. If something is sunset then it wane the neala. If the barbie discourage the neala and the barbie is not crackers then the barbie does not eat the neala. If the neala discourage the barbie then the neala is crackers. If something bedeck the neala and it does not visit the neala then the neala wane the barbie. If something bedeck the neala then the neala wane the barbie. If something wane the neala then the neala does not visit the barbie. The neala is crackers.", "logic": "\nDiscourage(neala, barbie)\nWane(neala, barbie)\nBedeck(barbie, neala)\nforall x (Crackers(x) -> not Cycloidal(x))\nforall x (Bedeck(x, barbie) and not Sunset(x) -> Cycloidal(x))\nforall x (Sunset(x) -> Wane(x, neala))\nDiscourage(barbie, neala) and not Crackers(barbie) -> not Bedeck(barbie, neala)\nDiscourage(neala, barbie) -> Crackers(neala)\nforall x (Bedeck(x, neala) and not Wane(x, neala) -> Wane(neala, barbie))\nforall x (Bedeck(x, neala) -> Wane(neala, barbie))\nforall x (Wane(x, neala) -> not Wane(neala, barbie))\n\nCrackers(neala)\n\nDiscourage(neala, barbie) and Discourage(neala, barbie) -> Crackers(neala) -> therefore Crackers(neala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The celinda smolder the judi. The celinda articulate the judi. The judi marry the celinda. All arcadian things are not dimorphous. If something marry the judi and it is not gowned then it is dimorphous. If something is gowned then it articulate the celinda. If the judi smolder the celinda and the judi is not arcadian then the judi does not eat the celinda. If the celinda smolder the judi then the celinda is arcadian. If something marry the celinda and it does not visit the celinda then the celinda articulate the judi. If something marry the celinda then the celinda articulate the judi. If something articulate the celinda then the celinda does not visit the judi. The celinda is not arcadian.", "logic": "\nSmolder(celinda, judi)\nArticulate(celinda, judi)\nMarry(judi, celinda)\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> not Dimorphous(x))\nforall x (Marry(x, judi) and not Gowned(x) -> Dimorphous(x))\nforall x (Gowned(x) -> Articulate(x, celinda))\nSmolder(judi, celinda) and not Arcadian(judi) -> not Marry(judi, celinda)\nSmolder(celinda, judi) -> Arcadian(celinda)\nforall x (Marry(x, celinda) and not Articulate(x, celinda) -> Articulate(celinda, judi))\nforall x (Marry(x, celinda) -> Articulate(celinda, judi))\nforall x (Articulate(x, celinda) -> not Articulate(celinda, judi))\n\nnot Arcadian(celinda)\n\nSmolder(celinda, judi) and Smolder(celinda, judi) -> Arcadian(celinda) -> therefore Arcadian(celinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The wallace admeasure the margette. The wallace await the margette. The margette flame the wallace. All nonviolent things are not subsidiary. If something flame the margette and it is not aboriginal then it is subsidiary. If something is aboriginal then it await the wallace. If the margette admeasure the wallace and the margette is not nonviolent then the margette does not eat the wallace. If the wallace admeasure the margette then the wallace is nonviolent. If something flame the wallace and it does not visit the wallace then the wallace await the margette. If something flame the wallace then the wallace await the margette. If something await the wallace then the wallace does not visit the margette. The wallace is not subsidiary.", "logic": "\nAdmeasure(wallace, margette)\nAwait(wallace, margette)\nFlame(margette, wallace)\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) -> not Subsidiary(x))\nforall x (Flame(x, margette) and not Aboriginal(x) -> Subsidiary(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) -> Await(x, wallace))\nAdmeasure(margette, wallace) and not Nonviolent(margette) -> not Flame(margette, wallace)\nAdmeasure(wallace, margette) -> Nonviolent(wallace)\nforall x (Flame(x, wallace) and not Await(x, wallace) -> Await(wallace, margette))\nforall x (Flame(x, wallace) -> Await(wallace, margette))\nforall x (Await(x, wallace) -> not Await(wallace, margette))\n\nnot Subsidiary(wallace)\n\nAdmeasure(wallace, margette) and Admeasure(wallace, margette) -> Nonviolent(wallace) -> therefore Nonviolent(wallace) Nonviolent(wallace) and forall x (Nonviolent(x) -> not Subsidiary(x)) -> therefore not Subsidiary(wallace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The grady agenise the vasilis. The grady bead the vasilis. The vasilis putty the grady. All reliable things are not screwy. If something putty the vasilis and it is not embroiled then it is screwy. If something is embroiled then it bead the grady. If the vasilis agenise the grady and the vasilis is not reliable then the vasilis does not eat the grady. If the grady agenise the vasilis then the grady is reliable. If something putty the grady and it does not visit the grady then the grady bead the vasilis. If something putty the grady then the grady bead the vasilis. If something bead the grady then the grady does not visit the vasilis. The grady is screwy.", "logic": "\nAgenise(grady, vasilis)\nBead(grady, vasilis)\nPutty(vasilis, grady)\nforall x (Reliable(x) -> not Screwy(x))\nforall x (Putty(x, vasilis) and not Embroiled(x) -> Screwy(x))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) -> Bead(x, grady))\nAgenise(vasilis, grady) and not Reliable(vasilis) -> not Putty(vasilis, grady)\nAgenise(grady, vasilis) -> Reliable(grady)\nforall x (Putty(x, grady) and not Bead(x, grady) -> Bead(grady, vasilis))\nforall x (Putty(x, grady) -> Bead(grady, vasilis))\nforall x (Bead(x, grady) -> not Bead(grady, vasilis))\n\nScrewy(grady)\n\nAgenise(grady, vasilis) and Agenise(grady, vasilis) -> Reliable(grady) -> therefore Reliable(grady) Reliable(grady) and forall x (Reliable(x) -> not Screwy(x)) -> therefore not Screwy(grady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The thad bemoan the zacharie. The thad strive the zacharie. The zacharie expiate the thad. All thundery things are not worthless. If something expiate the zacharie and it is not expectant then it is worthless. If something is expectant then it strive the thad. If the zacharie bemoan the thad and the zacharie is not thundery then the zacharie does not eat the thad. If the thad bemoan the zacharie then the thad is thundery. If something expiate the thad and it does not visit the thad then the thad strive the zacharie. If something expiate the thad then the thad strive the zacharie. If something strive the thad then the thad does not visit the zacharie. The thad does not visit the thad.", "logic": "\nBemoan(thad, zacharie)\nStrive(thad, zacharie)\nExpiate(zacharie, thad)\nforall x (Thundery(x) -> not Worthless(x))\nforall x (Expiate(x, zacharie) and not Expectant(x) -> Worthless(x))\nforall x (Expectant(x) -> Strive(x, thad))\nBemoan(zacharie, thad) and not Thundery(zacharie) -> not Expiate(zacharie, thad)\nBemoan(thad, zacharie) -> Thundery(thad)\nforall x (Expiate(x, thad) and not Strive(x, thad) -> Strive(thad, zacharie))\nforall x (Expiate(x, thad) -> Strive(thad, zacharie))\nforall x (Strive(x, thad) -> not Strive(thad, zacharie))\n\nnot Strive(thad, thad)\n\nforall x (Expectant(x) -> Strive(x, thad)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The janice devilise the ulick. The janice certify the ulick. The ulick lave the janice. All tapered things are not emerging. If something lave the ulick and it is not unfettered then it is emerging. If something is unfettered then it certify the janice. If the ulick devilise the janice and the ulick is not tapered then the ulick does not eat the janice. If the janice devilise the ulick then the janice is tapered. If something lave the janice and it does not visit the janice then the janice certify the ulick. If something lave the janice then the janice certify the ulick. If something certify the janice then the janice does not visit the ulick. The ulick certify the janice.", "logic": "\nDevilise(janice, ulick)\nCertify(janice, ulick)\nLave(ulick, janice)\nforall x (Tapered(x) -> not Emerging(x))\nforall x (Lave(x, ulick) and not Unfettered(x) -> Emerging(x))\nforall x (Unfettered(x) -> Certify(x, janice))\nDevilise(ulick, janice) and not Tapered(ulick) -> not Lave(ulick, janice)\nDevilise(janice, ulick) -> Tapered(janice)\nforall x (Lave(x, janice) and not Certify(x, janice) -> Certify(janice, ulick))\nforall x (Lave(x, janice) -> Certify(janice, ulick))\nforall x (Certify(x, janice) -> not Certify(janice, ulick))\n\nCertify(ulick, janice)\n\nforall x (Unfettered(x) -> Certify(x, janice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The witold cosign the jeralee. The witold disperse the jeralee. The jeralee pretend the witold. All underage things are not marine. If something pretend the jeralee and it is not brindle then it is marine. If something is brindle then it disperse the witold. If the jeralee cosign the witold and the jeralee is not underage then the jeralee does not eat the witold. If the witold cosign the jeralee then the witold is underage. If something pretend the witold and it does not visit the witold then the witold disperse the jeralee. If something pretend the witold then the witold disperse the jeralee. If something disperse the witold then the witold does not visit the jeralee. The jeralee is not marine.", "logic": "\nCosign(witold, jeralee)\nDisperse(witold, jeralee)\nPretend(jeralee, witold)\nforall x (Underage(x) -> not Marine(x))\nforall x (Pretend(x, jeralee) and not Brindle(x) -> Marine(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Disperse(x, witold))\nCosign(jeralee, witold) and not Underage(jeralee) -> not Pretend(jeralee, witold)\nCosign(witold, jeralee) -> Underage(witold)\nforall x (Pretend(x, witold) and not Disperse(x, witold) -> Disperse(witold, jeralee))\nforall x (Pretend(x, witold) -> Disperse(witold, jeralee))\nforall x (Disperse(x, witold) -> not Disperse(witold, jeralee))\n\nnot Marine(jeralee)\n\nforall x (Pretend(x, jeralee) and not Brindle(x) -> Marine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The dita disarrange the sarita. The dita digress the sarita. The sarita overlook the dita. All cognizant things are not lively. If something overlook the sarita and it is not seventh then it is lively. If something is seventh then it digress the dita. If the sarita disarrange the dita and the sarita is not cognizant then the sarita does not eat the dita. If the dita disarrange the sarita then the dita is cognizant. If something overlook the dita and it does not visit the dita then the dita digress the sarita. If something overlook the dita then the dita digress the sarita. If something digress the dita then the dita does not visit the sarita. The sarita overlook the sarita.", "logic": "\nDisarrange(dita, sarita)\nDigress(dita, sarita)\nOverlook(sarita, dita)\nforall x (Cognizant(x) -> not Lively(x))\nforall x (Overlook(x, sarita) and not Seventh(x) -> Lively(x))\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> Digress(x, dita))\nDisarrange(sarita, dita) and not Cognizant(sarita) -> not Overlook(sarita, dita)\nDisarrange(dita, sarita) -> Cognizant(dita)\nforall x (Overlook(x, dita) and not Digress(x, dita) -> Digress(dita, sarita))\nforall x (Overlook(x, dita) -> Digress(dita, sarita))\nforall x (Digress(x, dita) -> not Digress(dita, sarita))\n\nOverlook(sarita, sarita)\n\nOverlook(sarita, sarita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The trixi toot the aphrodite. The trixi award the aphrodite. The aphrodite apologize the trixi. All unlaced things are not isocyclic. If something apologize the aphrodite and it is not immortal then it is isocyclic. If something is immortal then it award the trixi. If the aphrodite toot the trixi and the aphrodite is not unlaced then the aphrodite does not eat the trixi. If the trixi toot the aphrodite then the trixi is unlaced. If something apologize the trixi and it does not visit the trixi then the trixi award the aphrodite. If something apologize the trixi then the trixi award the aphrodite. If something award the trixi then the trixi does not visit the aphrodite. The trixi does not eat the aphrodite.", "logic": "\nToot(trixi, aphrodite)\nAward(trixi, aphrodite)\nApologize(aphrodite, trixi)\nforall x (Unlaced(x) -> not Isocyclic(x))\nforall x (Apologize(x, aphrodite) and not Immortal(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\nforall x (Immortal(x) -> Award(x, trixi))\nToot(aphrodite, trixi) and not Unlaced(aphrodite) -> not Apologize(aphrodite, trixi)\nToot(trixi, aphrodite) -> Unlaced(trixi)\nforall x (Apologize(x, trixi) and not Award(x, trixi) -> Award(trixi, aphrodite))\nforall x (Apologize(x, trixi) -> Award(trixi, aphrodite))\nforall x (Award(x, trixi) -> not Award(trixi, aphrodite))\n\nnot Apologize(trixi, aphrodite)\n\nnot Apologize(trixi, aphrodite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The alisun detest the nevsa. The alisun discolor the nevsa. The nevsa moisturize the alisun. All thrifty things are not stilly. If something moisturize the nevsa and it is not hemic then it is stilly. If something is hemic then it discolor the alisun. If the nevsa detest the alisun and the nevsa is not thrifty then the nevsa does not eat the alisun. If the alisun detest the nevsa then the alisun is thrifty. If something moisturize the alisun and it does not visit the alisun then the alisun discolor the nevsa. If something moisturize the alisun then the alisun discolor the nevsa. If something discolor the alisun then the alisun does not visit the nevsa. The nevsa discolor the nevsa.", "logic": "\nDetest(alisun, nevsa)\nDiscolor(alisun, nevsa)\nMoisturize(nevsa, alisun)\nforall x (Thrifty(x) -> not Stilly(x))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, nevsa) and not Hemic(x) -> Stilly(x))\nforall x (Hemic(x) -> Discolor(x, alisun))\nDetest(nevsa, alisun) and not Thrifty(nevsa) -> not Moisturize(nevsa, alisun)\nDetest(alisun, nevsa) -> Thrifty(alisun)\nforall x (Moisturize(x, alisun) and not Discolor(x, alisun) -> Discolor(alisun, nevsa))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, alisun) -> Discolor(alisun, nevsa))\nforall x (Discolor(x, alisun) -> not Discolor(alisun, nevsa))\n\nDiscolor(nevsa, nevsa)\n\nDiscolor(nevsa, nevsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-280"} {"premises": "The rhodie blend the zedekiah. The zedekiah does not visit the rhodie. If the rhodie laicise the zedekiah then the rhodie does not eat the zedekiah. If something laicise the rhodie then it is noncausal. If something blend the zedekiah then the zedekiah laicise the rhodie. If something blend the zedekiah then it is ancillary. If something blend the rhodie then the rhodie laicise the zedekiah. If something headline the zedekiah then it is vegetive. The zedekiah does not visit the rhodie.", "logic": "\nBlend(rhodie, zedekiah)\nnot Headline(zedekiah, rhodie)\nLaicise(rhodie, zedekiah) -> not Blend(rhodie, zedekiah)\nforall x (Laicise(x, rhodie) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Blend(x, zedekiah) -> Laicise(zedekiah, rhodie))\nforall x (Blend(x, zedekiah) -> Ancillary(x))\nforall x (Blend(x, rhodie) -> Laicise(rhodie, zedekiah))\nforall x (Headline(x, zedekiah) -> Vegetive(x))\n\nnot Headline(zedekiah, rhodie)\n\ntherefore not Headline(zedekiah, rhodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The randolf canter the claribel. The claribel does not visit the randolf. If the randolf pout the claribel then the randolf does not eat the claribel. If something pout the randolf then it is blithesome. If something canter the claribel then the claribel pout the randolf. If something canter the claribel then it is pyloric. If something canter the randolf then the randolf pout the claribel. If something veto the claribel then it is attrited. The randolf does not eat the claribel.", "logic": "\nCanter(randolf, claribel)\nnot Veto(claribel, randolf)\nPout(randolf, claribel) -> not Canter(randolf, claribel)\nforall x (Pout(x, randolf) -> Blithesome(x))\nforall x (Canter(x, claribel) -> Pout(claribel, randolf))\nforall x (Canter(x, claribel) -> Pyloric(x))\nforall x (Canter(x, randolf) -> Pout(randolf, claribel))\nforall x (Veto(x, claribel) -> Attrited(x))\n\nnot Canter(randolf, claribel)\n\ntherefore Canter(randolf, claribel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The tray whitewash the enrico. The enrico does not visit the tray. If the tray watch the enrico then the tray does not eat the enrico. If something watch the tray then it is combative. If something whitewash the enrico then the enrico watch the tray. If something whitewash the enrico then it is geodesic. If something whitewash the tray then the tray watch the enrico. If something poke the enrico then it is oiled. The enrico watch the tray.", "logic": "\nWhitewash(tray, enrico)\nnot Poke(enrico, tray)\nWatch(tray, enrico) -> not Whitewash(tray, enrico)\nforall x (Watch(x, tray) -> Combative(x))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, enrico) -> Watch(enrico, tray))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, enrico) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, tray) -> Watch(tray, enrico))\nforall x (Poke(x, enrico) -> Oiled(x))\n\nWatch(enrico, tray)\n\nWhitewash(tray, enrico) and forall x (Whitewash(x, enrico) -> Watch(enrico, tray)) -> therefore Watch(enrico, tray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The harald jolt the taber. The taber does not visit the harald. If the harald bunk the taber then the harald does not eat the taber. If something bunk the harald then it is unvented. If something jolt the taber then the taber bunk the harald. If something jolt the taber then it is javan. If something jolt the harald then the harald bunk the taber. If something disfavour the taber then it is nocent. The taber does not chase the harald.", "logic": "\nJolt(harald, taber)\nnot Disfavour(taber, harald)\nBunk(harald, taber) -> not Jolt(harald, taber)\nforall x (Bunk(x, harald) -> Unvented(x))\nforall x (Jolt(x, taber) -> Bunk(taber, harald))\nforall x (Jolt(x, taber) -> Javan(x))\nforall x (Jolt(x, harald) -> Bunk(harald, taber))\nforall x (Disfavour(x, taber) -> Nocent(x))\n\nnot Bunk(taber, harald)\n\nJolt(harald, taber) and forall x (Jolt(x, taber) -> Bunk(taber, harald)) -> therefore Bunk(taber, harald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The joe bulldog the mag. The mag does not visit the joe. If the joe underdress the mag then the joe does not eat the mag. If something underdress the joe then it is winding. If something bulldog the mag then the mag underdress the joe. If something bulldog the mag then it is reverse. If something bulldog the joe then the joe underdress the mag. If something collect the mag then it is like. The mag is winding.", "logic": "\nBulldog(joe, mag)\nnot Collect(mag, joe)\nUnderdress(joe, mag) -> not Bulldog(joe, mag)\nforall x (Underdress(x, joe) -> Winding(x))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, mag) -> Underdress(mag, joe))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, mag) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, joe) -> Underdress(joe, mag))\nforall x (Collect(x, mag) -> Like(x))\n\nWinding(mag)\n\nBulldog(joe, mag) and forall x (Bulldog(x, mag) -> Underdress(mag, joe)) -> therefore Underdress(mag, joe) Underdress(mag, joe) and forall x (Underdress(x, joe) -> Winding(x)) -> therefore Winding(mag)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The boris effect the phylys. The phylys does not visit the boris. If the boris traduce the phylys then the boris does not eat the phylys. If something traduce the boris then it is unjust. If something effect the phylys then the phylys traduce the boris. If something effect the phylys then it is systolic. If something effect the boris then the boris traduce the phylys. If something terrasse the phylys then it is squawky. The phylys is not unjust.", "logic": "\nEffect(boris, phylys)\nnot Terrasse(phylys, boris)\nTraduce(boris, phylys) -> not Effect(boris, phylys)\nforall x (Traduce(x, boris) -> Unjust(x))\nforall x (Effect(x, phylys) -> Traduce(phylys, boris))\nforall x (Effect(x, phylys) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Effect(x, boris) -> Traduce(boris, phylys))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, phylys) -> Squawky(x))\n\nnot Unjust(phylys)\n\nEffect(boris, phylys) and forall x (Effect(x, phylys) -> Traduce(phylys, boris)) -> therefore Traduce(phylys, boris) Traduce(phylys, boris) and forall x (Traduce(x, boris) -> Unjust(x)) -> therefore Unjust(phylys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The thurston unveil the dorothee. The dorothee does not visit the thurston. If the thurston deject the dorothee then the thurston does not eat the dorothee. If something deject the thurston then it is ductile. If something unveil the dorothee then the dorothee deject the thurston. If something unveil the dorothee then it is past. If something unveil the thurston then the thurston deject the dorothee. If something demo the dorothee then it is octal. The thurston does not chase the dorothee.", "logic": "\nUnveil(thurston, dorothee)\nnot Demo(dorothee, thurston)\nDeject(thurston, dorothee) -> not Unveil(thurston, dorothee)\nforall x (Deject(x, thurston) -> Ductile(x))\nforall x (Unveil(x, dorothee) -> Deject(dorothee, thurston))\nforall x (Unveil(x, dorothee) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Unveil(x, thurston) -> Deject(thurston, dorothee))\nforall x (Demo(x, dorothee) -> Octal(x))\n\nnot Deject(thurston, dorothee)\n\nforall x (Unveil(x, thurston) -> Deject(thurston, dorothee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The abbi porter the margalo. The margalo does not visit the abbi. If the abbi swat the margalo then the abbi does not eat the margalo. If something swat the abbi then it is alluvial. If something porter the margalo then the margalo swat the abbi. If something porter the margalo then it is subversive. If something porter the abbi then the abbi swat the margalo. If something cowhide the margalo then it is futurist. The margalo is futurist.", "logic": "\nPorter(abbi, margalo)\nnot Cowhide(margalo, abbi)\nSwat(abbi, margalo) -> not Porter(abbi, margalo)\nforall x (Swat(x, abbi) -> Alluvial(x))\nforall x (Porter(x, margalo) -> Swat(margalo, abbi))\nforall x (Porter(x, margalo) -> Subversive(x))\nforall x (Porter(x, abbi) -> Swat(abbi, margalo))\nforall x (Cowhide(x, margalo) -> Futurist(x))\n\nFuturist(margalo)\n\nforall x (Cowhide(x, margalo) -> Futurist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The matthew prejudice the sax. The sax does not visit the matthew. If the matthew browbeat the sax then the matthew does not eat the sax. If something browbeat the matthew then it is encased. If something prejudice the sax then the sax browbeat the matthew. If something prejudice the sax then it is both. If something prejudice the matthew then the matthew browbeat the sax. If something rice the sax then it is pointless. The sax is not both.", "logic": "\nPrejudice(matthew, sax)\nnot Rice(sax, matthew)\nBrowbeat(matthew, sax) -> not Prejudice(matthew, sax)\nforall x (Browbeat(x, matthew) -> Encased(x))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, sax) -> Browbeat(sax, matthew))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, sax) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, matthew) -> Browbeat(matthew, sax))\nforall x (Rice(x, sax) -> Pointless(x))\n\nnot Both(sax)\n\nforall x (Prejudice(x, sax) -> Both(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The marcie recognize the rosemary. The rosemary does not visit the marcie. If the marcie crap the rosemary then the marcie does not eat the rosemary. If something crap the marcie then it is tardy. If something recognize the rosemary then the rosemary crap the marcie. If something recognize the rosemary then it is unextended. If something recognize the marcie then the marcie crap the rosemary. If something affiance the rosemary then it is unfenced. The marcie crap the marcie.", "logic": "\nRecognize(marcie, rosemary)\nnot Affiance(rosemary, marcie)\nCrap(marcie, rosemary) -> not Recognize(marcie, rosemary)\nforall x (Crap(x, marcie) -> Tardy(x))\nforall x (Recognize(x, rosemary) -> Crap(rosemary, marcie))\nforall x (Recognize(x, rosemary) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Recognize(x, marcie) -> Crap(marcie, rosemary))\nforall x (Affiance(x, rosemary) -> Unfenced(x))\n\nCrap(marcie, marcie)\n\nCrap(marcie, marcie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The natalina coquet the amalea. The amalea does not visit the natalina. If the natalina animalize the amalea then the natalina does not eat the amalea. If something animalize the natalina then it is dormy. If something coquet the amalea then the amalea animalize the natalina. If something coquet the amalea then it is geniculate. If something coquet the natalina then the natalina animalize the amalea. If something baptise the amalea then it is dendroidal. The amalea does not chase the amalea.", "logic": "\nCoquet(natalina, amalea)\nnot Baptise(amalea, natalina)\nAnimalize(natalina, amalea) -> not Coquet(natalina, amalea)\nforall x (Animalize(x, natalina) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Coquet(x, amalea) -> Animalize(amalea, natalina))\nforall x (Coquet(x, amalea) -> Geniculate(x))\nforall x (Coquet(x, natalina) -> Animalize(natalina, amalea))\nforall x (Baptise(x, amalea) -> Dendroidal(x))\n\nnot Animalize(amalea, amalea)\n\nnot Animalize(amalea, amalea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The bonnee thrill the dino. The dino does not visit the bonnee. If the bonnee plumb the dino then the bonnee does not eat the dino. If something plumb the bonnee then it is bulbous. If something thrill the dino then the dino plumb the bonnee. If something thrill the dino then it is ictic. If something thrill the bonnee then the bonnee plumb the dino. If something pollute the dino then it is pallid. The dino thrill the dino.", "logic": "\nThrill(bonnee, dino)\nnot Pollute(dino, bonnee)\nPlumb(bonnee, dino) -> not Thrill(bonnee, dino)\nforall x (Plumb(x, bonnee) -> Bulbous(x))\nforall x (Thrill(x, dino) -> Plumb(dino, bonnee))\nforall x (Thrill(x, dino) -> Ictic(x))\nforall x (Thrill(x, bonnee) -> Plumb(bonnee, dino))\nforall x (Pollute(x, dino) -> Pallid(x))\n\nThrill(dino, dino)\n\nThrill(dino, dino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-190"} {"premises": "The ann quell the misti. The ann is patchy. The ann is aperient. The ann is faveolate. The ann vandalise the misti. The misti is tinpot. The misti addle the ann. If someone vandalise the misti then the misti vandalise the ann. If someone vandalise the ann and the ann does not like the misti then the misti addle the ann. If someone vandalise the ann then they are not patchy. The ann is aperient.", "logic": "\nQuell(ann, misti)\nPatchy(ann)\nAperient(ann)\nFaveolate(ann)\nVandalise(ann, misti)\nTinpot(misti)\nAddle(misti, ann)\nforall x (Vandalise(x, misti) -> Vandalise(misti, ann))\nforall x (Vandalise(x, ann) and not Addle(ann, misti) -> Addle(misti, ann))\nforall x (Vandalise(x, ann) -> not Patchy(x))\n\nAperient(ann)\n\ntherefore Aperient(ann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The ignatius homogenize the korrie. The ignatius is unstudied. The ignatius is ciliate. The ignatius is brut. The ignatius misspell the korrie. The korrie is ergotropic. The korrie levant the ignatius. If someone misspell the korrie then the korrie misspell the ignatius. If someone misspell the ignatius and the ignatius does not like the korrie then the korrie levant the ignatius. If someone misspell the ignatius then they are not unstudied. The ignatius does not visit the korrie.", "logic": "\nHomogenize(ignatius, korrie)\nUnstudied(ignatius)\nCiliate(ignatius)\nBrut(ignatius)\nMisspell(ignatius, korrie)\nErgotropic(korrie)\nLevant(korrie, ignatius)\nforall x (Misspell(x, korrie) -> Misspell(korrie, ignatius))\nforall x (Misspell(x, ignatius) and not Levant(ignatius, korrie) -> Levant(korrie, ignatius))\nforall x (Misspell(x, ignatius) -> not Unstudied(x))\n\nnot Misspell(ignatius, korrie)\n\ntherefore Misspell(ignatius, korrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The renato contuse the candy. The renato is adaptative. The renato is platonic. The renato is poised. The renato letter the candy. The candy is abducent. The candy travesty the renato. If someone letter the candy then the candy letter the renato. If someone letter the renato and the renato does not like the candy then the candy travesty the renato. If someone letter the renato then they are not adaptative. The candy letter the renato.", "logic": "\nContuse(renato, candy)\nAdaptative(renato)\nPlatonic(renato)\nPoised(renato)\nLetter(renato, candy)\nAbducent(candy)\nTravesty(candy, renato)\nforall x (Letter(x, candy) -> Letter(candy, renato))\nforall x (Letter(x, renato) and not Travesty(renato, candy) -> Travesty(candy, renato))\nforall x (Letter(x, renato) -> not Adaptative(x))\n\nLetter(candy, renato)\n\nLetter(renato, candy) and forall x (Letter(x, candy) -> Letter(candy, renato)) -> therefore Letter(candy, renato)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The rem sneak the tootsie. The rem is formulary. The rem is vapourous. The rem is infertile. The rem wind the tootsie. The tootsie is eastside. The tootsie edit the rem. If someone wind the tootsie then the tootsie wind the rem. If someone wind the rem and the rem does not like the tootsie then the tootsie edit the rem. If someone wind the rem then they are not formulary. The tootsie does not visit the rem.", "logic": "\nSneak(rem, tootsie)\nFormulary(rem)\nVapourous(rem)\nInfertile(rem)\nWind(rem, tootsie)\nEastside(tootsie)\nEdit(tootsie, rem)\nforall x (Wind(x, tootsie) -> Wind(tootsie, rem))\nforall x (Wind(x, rem) and not Edit(rem, tootsie) -> Edit(tootsie, rem))\nforall x (Wind(x, rem) -> not Formulary(x))\n\nnot Wind(tootsie, rem)\n\nWind(rem, tootsie) and forall x (Wind(x, tootsie) -> Wind(tootsie, rem)) -> therefore Wind(tootsie, rem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The morrie motion the bonny. The morrie is star. The morrie is abreast. The morrie is homogenous. The morrie defend the bonny. The bonny is drained. The bonny prospect the morrie. If someone defend the bonny then the bonny defend the morrie. If someone defend the morrie and the morrie does not like the bonny then the bonny prospect the morrie. If someone defend the morrie then they are not star. The bonny is not star.", "logic": "\nMotion(morrie, bonny)\nStar(morrie)\nAbreast(morrie)\nHomogenous(morrie)\nDefend(morrie, bonny)\nDrained(bonny)\nProspect(bonny, morrie)\nforall x (Defend(x, bonny) -> Defend(bonny, morrie))\nforall x (Defend(x, morrie) and not Prospect(morrie, bonny) -> Prospect(bonny, morrie))\nforall x (Defend(x, morrie) -> not Star(x))\n\nnot Star(bonny)\n\nDefend(morrie, bonny) and forall x (Defend(x, bonny) -> Defend(bonny, morrie)) -> therefore Defend(bonny, morrie) Defend(bonny, morrie) and forall x (Defend(x, morrie) -> not Star(x)) -> therefore not Star(bonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The eugine equivocate the eberhard. The eugine is onstage. The eugine is rancid. The eugine is sorrel. The eugine politick the eberhard. The eberhard is sporadic. The eberhard linger the eugine. If someone politick the eberhard then the eberhard politick the eugine. If someone politick the eugine and the eugine does not like the eberhard then the eberhard linger the eugine. If someone politick the eugine then they are not onstage. The eberhard is onstage.", "logic": "\nEquivocate(eugine, eberhard)\nOnstage(eugine)\nRancid(eugine)\nSorrel(eugine)\nPolitick(eugine, eberhard)\nSporadic(eberhard)\nLinger(eberhard, eugine)\nforall x (Politick(x, eberhard) -> Politick(eberhard, eugine))\nforall x (Politick(x, eugine) and not Linger(eugine, eberhard) -> Linger(eberhard, eugine))\nforall x (Politick(x, eugine) -> not Onstage(x))\n\nOnstage(eberhard)\n\nPolitick(eugine, eberhard) and forall x (Politick(x, eberhard) -> Politick(eberhard, eugine)) -> therefore Politick(eberhard, eugine) Politick(eberhard, eugine) and forall x (Politick(x, eugine) -> not Onstage(x)) -> therefore not Onstage(eberhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The romonda solve the kathryne. The romonda is malted. The romonda is attendant. The romonda is ungodly. The romonda vitaminize the kathryne. The kathryne is incorrupt. The kathryne equivocate the romonda. If someone vitaminize the kathryne then the kathryne vitaminize the romonda. If someone vitaminize the romonda and the romonda does not like the kathryne then the kathryne equivocate the romonda. If someone vitaminize the romonda then they are not malted. The romonda does not chase the romonda.", "logic": "\nSolve(romonda, kathryne)\nMalted(romonda)\nAttendant(romonda)\nUngodly(romonda)\nVitaminize(romonda, kathryne)\nIncorrupt(kathryne)\nEquivocate(kathryne, romonda)\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, kathryne) -> Vitaminize(kathryne, romonda))\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, romonda) and not Equivocate(romonda, kathryne) -> Equivocate(kathryne, romonda))\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, romonda) -> not Malted(x))\n\nnot Solve(romonda, romonda)\n\nnot Solve(romonda, romonda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The alexandra gabble the morlee. The alexandra is forbidding. The alexandra is ctenoid. The alexandra is pupal. The alexandra defy the morlee. The morlee is centenary. The morlee handstamp the alexandra. If someone defy the morlee then the morlee defy the alexandra. If someone defy the alexandra and the alexandra does not like the morlee then the morlee handstamp the alexandra. If someone defy the alexandra then they are not forbidding. The alexandra handstamp the morlee.", "logic": "\nGabble(alexandra, morlee)\nForbidding(alexandra)\nCtenoid(alexandra)\nPupal(alexandra)\nDefy(alexandra, morlee)\nCentenary(morlee)\nHandstamp(morlee, alexandra)\nforall x (Defy(x, morlee) -> Defy(morlee, alexandra))\nforall x (Defy(x, alexandra) and not Handstamp(alexandra, morlee) -> Handstamp(morlee, alexandra))\nforall x (Defy(x, alexandra) -> not Forbidding(x))\n\nHandstamp(alexandra, morlee)\n\nHandstamp(alexandra, morlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The glynnis gamble the moshe. The glynnis is moraceous. The glynnis is untapped. The glynnis is ungusseted. The glynnis sibilate the moshe. The moshe is silvan. The moshe deal the glynnis. If someone sibilate the moshe then the moshe sibilate the glynnis. If someone sibilate the glynnis and the glynnis does not like the moshe then the moshe deal the glynnis. If someone sibilate the glynnis then they are not moraceous. The moshe is not ungusseted.", "logic": "\nGamble(glynnis, moshe)\nMoraceous(glynnis)\nUntapped(glynnis)\nUngusseted(glynnis)\nSibilate(glynnis, moshe)\nSilvan(moshe)\nDeal(moshe, glynnis)\nforall x (Sibilate(x, moshe) -> Sibilate(moshe, glynnis))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, glynnis) and not Deal(glynnis, moshe) -> Deal(moshe, glynnis))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, glynnis) -> not Moraceous(x))\n\nnot Ungusseted(moshe)\n\nnot Ungusseted(moshe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The clarinda introspect the mufi. The clarinda is foodless. The clarinda is nonviolent. The clarinda is riveting. The clarinda assist the mufi. The mufi is laureate. The mufi spare the clarinda. If someone assist the mufi then the mufi assist the clarinda. If someone assist the clarinda and the clarinda does not like the mufi then the mufi spare the clarinda. If someone assist the clarinda then they are not foodless. The mufi is nonviolent.", "logic": "\nIntrospect(clarinda, mufi)\nFoodless(clarinda)\nNonviolent(clarinda)\nRiveting(clarinda)\nAssist(clarinda, mufi)\nLaureate(mufi)\nSpare(mufi, clarinda)\nforall x (Assist(x, mufi) -> Assist(mufi, clarinda))\nforall x (Assist(x, clarinda) and not Spare(clarinda, mufi) -> Spare(mufi, clarinda))\nforall x (Assist(x, clarinda) -> not Foodless(x))\n\nNonviolent(mufi)\n\nNonviolent(mufi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The roger detain the dolores. The roger is dented. The roger is virile. The roger is unproved. The roger creolize the dolores. The dolores is assertive. The dolores beggar the roger. If someone creolize the dolores then the dolores creolize the roger. If someone creolize the roger and the roger does not like the dolores then the dolores beggar the roger. If someone creolize the roger then they are not dented. The roger does not like the roger.", "logic": "\nDetain(roger, dolores)\nDented(roger)\nVirile(roger)\nUnproved(roger)\nCreolize(roger, dolores)\nAssertive(dolores)\nBeggar(dolores, roger)\nforall x (Creolize(x, dolores) -> Creolize(dolores, roger))\nforall x (Creolize(x, roger) and not Beggar(roger, dolores) -> Beggar(dolores, roger))\nforall x (Creolize(x, roger) -> not Dented(x))\n\nnot Beggar(roger, roger)\n\nnot Beggar(roger, roger) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "The rowena whang the bernelle. The rowena is clamorous. The rowena is satyric. The rowena is starboard. The rowena scrub the bernelle. The bernelle is mendicant. The bernelle slake the rowena. If someone scrub the bernelle then the bernelle scrub the rowena. If someone scrub the rowena and the rowena does not like the bernelle then the bernelle slake the rowena. If someone scrub the rowena then they are not clamorous. The bernelle whang the bernelle.", "logic": "\nWhang(rowena, bernelle)\nClamorous(rowena)\nSatyric(rowena)\nStarboard(rowena)\nScrub(rowena, bernelle)\nMendicant(bernelle)\nSlake(bernelle, rowena)\nforall x (Scrub(x, bernelle) -> Scrub(bernelle, rowena))\nforall x (Scrub(x, rowena) and not Slake(rowena, bernelle) -> Slake(bernelle, rowena))\nforall x (Scrub(x, rowena) -> not Clamorous(x))\n\nWhang(bernelle, bernelle)\n\nWhang(bernelle, bernelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-887"} {"premises": "Tab is scaphoid. John is fungous. John is scaphoid. All amendatory, scaphoid things are shabby. If something is isochronal and fungous then it is toneless. Quiet, shabby things are amendatory. Cold, scaphoid things are toneless. If Tab is scaphoid and Tab is isochronal then Tab is shabby. If something is fungous then it is isochronal. If something is toneless and fungous then it is scaphoid. Big, toneless things are fungous. John is fungous.", "logic": "\nScaphoid(tab)\nFungous(john)\nScaphoid(john)\nforall x (Amendatory(x) and Scaphoid(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Isochronal(x) and Fungous(x) -> Toneless(x))\nforall x (Toneless(x) and Shabby(x) -> Amendatory(x))\nforall x (Amendatory(x) and Scaphoid(x) -> Toneless(x))\nScaphoid(tab) and Isochronal(tab) -> Shabby(tab)\nforall x (Fungous(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nforall x (Toneless(x) and Fungous(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Shabby(x) and Toneless(x) -> Fungous(x))\n\nFungous(john)\n\ntherefore Fungous(john)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Sonia is beadlike. Aleece is tongued. Aleece is beadlike. All sounding, beadlike things are germinal. If something is panegyric and tongued then it is encircled. Quiet, germinal things are sounding. Cold, beadlike things are encircled. If Sonia is beadlike and Sonia is panegyric then Sonia is germinal. If something is tongued then it is panegyric. If something is encircled and tongued then it is beadlike. Big, encircled things are tongued. Sonia is not beadlike.", "logic": "\nBeadlike(sonia)\nTongued(aleece)\nBeadlike(aleece)\nforall x (Sounding(x) and Beadlike(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Panegyric(x) and Tongued(x) -> Encircled(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) and Germinal(x) -> Sounding(x))\nforall x (Sounding(x) and Beadlike(x) -> Encircled(x))\nBeadlike(sonia) and Panegyric(sonia) -> Germinal(sonia)\nforall x (Tongued(x) -> Panegyric(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) and Tongued(x) -> Beadlike(x))\nforall x (Germinal(x) and Encircled(x) -> Tongued(x))\n\nnot Beadlike(sonia)\n\ntherefore Beadlike(sonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Herrick is conceited. Hestia is ametropic. Hestia is conceited. All enforced, conceited things are ninefold. If something is equestrian and ametropic then it is huddled. Quiet, ninefold things are enforced. Cold, conceited things are huddled. If Herrick is conceited and Herrick is equestrian then Herrick is ninefold. If something is ametropic then it is equestrian. If something is huddled and ametropic then it is conceited. Big, huddled things are ametropic. Hestia is equestrian.", "logic": "\nConceited(herrick)\nAmetropic(hestia)\nConceited(hestia)\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Conceited(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Equestrian(x) and Ametropic(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Huddled(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Enforced(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Conceited(x) -> Huddled(x))\nConceited(herrick) and Equestrian(herrick) -> Ninefold(herrick)\nforall x (Ametropic(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nforall x (Huddled(x) and Ametropic(x) -> Conceited(x))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Huddled(x) -> Ametropic(x))\n\nEquestrian(hestia)\n\nAmetropic(hestia) and forall x (Ametropic(x) -> Equestrian(x)) -> therefore Equestrian(hestia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Titus is nonionic. Gae is returning. Gae is nonionic. All awash, nonionic things are resupine. If something is falling and returning then it is vernal. Quiet, resupine things are awash. Cold, nonionic things are vernal. If Titus is nonionic and Titus is falling then Titus is resupine. If something is returning then it is falling. If something is vernal and returning then it is nonionic. Big, vernal things are returning. Gae is not falling.", "logic": "\nNonionic(titus)\nReturning(gae)\nNonionic(gae)\nforall x (Awash(x) and Nonionic(x) -> Resupine(x))\nforall x (Falling(x) and Returning(x) -> Vernal(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) and Resupine(x) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Nonionic(x) -> Vernal(x))\nNonionic(titus) and Falling(titus) -> Resupine(titus)\nforall x (Returning(x) -> Falling(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) and Returning(x) -> Nonionic(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) and Vernal(x) -> Returning(x))\n\nnot Falling(gae)\n\nReturning(gae) and forall x (Returning(x) -> Falling(x)) -> therefore Falling(gae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Andrej is brambly. Julieta is naiant. Julieta is brambly. All unlifelike, brambly things are secret. If something is lengthways and naiant then it is facile. Quiet, secret things are unlifelike. Cold, brambly things are facile. If Andrej is brambly and Andrej is lengthways then Andrej is secret. If something is naiant then it is lengthways. If something is facile and naiant then it is brambly. Big, facile things are naiant. Julieta is facile.", "logic": "\nBrambly(andrej)\nNaiant(julieta)\nBrambly(julieta)\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) and Brambly(x) -> Secret(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) and Naiant(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Facile(x) and Secret(x) -> Unlifelike(x))\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) and Brambly(x) -> Facile(x))\nBrambly(andrej) and Lengthways(andrej) -> Secret(andrej)\nforall x (Naiant(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Facile(x) and Naiant(x) -> Brambly(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) and Facile(x) -> Naiant(x))\n\nFacile(julieta)\n\nNaiant(julieta) and forall x (Naiant(x) -> Lengthways(x)) -> therefore Lengthways(julieta) Lengthways(julieta) and Naiant(julieta) and forall x (Lengthways(x) and Naiant(x) -> Facile(x)) -> therefore Facile(julieta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Josiah is jumentous. Claire is glittery. Claire is jumentous. All poky, jumentous things are fervid. If something is israeli and glittery then it is diffusive. Quiet, fervid things are poky. Cold, jumentous things are diffusive. If Josiah is jumentous and Josiah is israeli then Josiah is fervid. If something is glittery then it is israeli. If something is diffusive and glittery then it is jumentous. Big, diffusive things are glittery. Claire is not diffusive.", "logic": "\nJumentous(josiah)\nGlittery(claire)\nJumentous(claire)\nforall x (Poky(x) and Jumentous(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Israeli(x) and Glittery(x) -> Diffusive(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) and Fervid(x) -> Poky(x))\nforall x (Poky(x) and Jumentous(x) -> Diffusive(x))\nJumentous(josiah) and Israeli(josiah) -> Fervid(josiah)\nforall x (Glittery(x) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) and Glittery(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Fervid(x) and Diffusive(x) -> Glittery(x))\n\nnot Diffusive(claire)\n\nGlittery(claire) and forall x (Glittery(x) -> Israeli(x)) -> therefore Israeli(claire) Israeli(claire) and Glittery(claire) and forall x (Israeli(x) and Glittery(x) -> Diffusive(x)) -> therefore Diffusive(claire)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Demetre is millennian. Gavriel is muciferous. Gavriel is millennian. All exothermic, millennian things are gratuitous. If something is limitless and muciferous then it is erring. Quiet, gratuitous things are exothermic. Cold, millennian things are erring. If Demetre is millennian and Demetre is limitless then Demetre is gratuitous. If something is muciferous then it is limitless. If something is erring and muciferous then it is millennian. Big, erring things are muciferous. Demetre is not exothermic.", "logic": "\nMillennian(demetre)\nMuciferous(gavriel)\nMillennian(gavriel)\nforall x (Exothermic(x) and Millennian(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\nforall x (Limitless(x) and Muciferous(x) -> Erring(x))\nforall x (Erring(x) and Gratuitous(x) -> Exothermic(x))\nforall x (Exothermic(x) and Millennian(x) -> Erring(x))\nMillennian(demetre) and Limitless(demetre) -> Gratuitous(demetre)\nforall x (Muciferous(x) -> Limitless(x))\nforall x (Erring(x) and Muciferous(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) and Erring(x) -> Muciferous(x))\n\nnot Exothermic(demetre)\n\nforall x (Erring(x) and Gratuitous(x) -> Exothermic(x)) <- forall x (Limitless(x) and Muciferous(x) -> Erring(x)) <- forall x (Gratuitous(x) and Erring(x) -> Muciferous(x)) <- forall x (Exothermic(x) and Millennian(x) -> Erring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Colene is classical. Cynthea is nourished. Cynthea is classical. All unstrained, classical things are furlike. If something is aortal and nourished then it is infectious. Quiet, furlike things are unstrained. Cold, classical things are infectious. If Colene is classical and Colene is aortal then Colene is furlike. If something is nourished then it is aortal. If something is infectious and nourished then it is classical. Big, infectious things are nourished. Cynthea is unstrained.", "logic": "\nClassical(colene)\nNourished(cynthea)\nClassical(cynthea)\nforall x (Unstrained(x) and Classical(x) -> Furlike(x))\nforall x (Aortal(x) and Nourished(x) -> Infectious(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) and Furlike(x) -> Unstrained(x))\nforall x (Unstrained(x) and Classical(x) -> Infectious(x))\nClassical(colene) and Aortal(colene) -> Furlike(colene)\nforall x (Nourished(x) -> Aortal(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) and Nourished(x) -> Classical(x))\nforall x (Furlike(x) and Infectious(x) -> Nourished(x))\n\nUnstrained(cynthea)\n\nforall x (Infectious(x) and Furlike(x) -> Unstrained(x)) <- forall x (Unstrained(x) and Classical(x) -> Furlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Suzie is anechoic. Biddy is disclosed. Biddy is anechoic. All endogenic, anechoic things are parched. If something is hiemal and disclosed then it is tapestried. Quiet, parched things are endogenic. Cold, anechoic things are tapestried. If Suzie is anechoic and Suzie is hiemal then Suzie is parched. If something is disclosed then it is hiemal. If something is tapestried and disclosed then it is anechoic. Big, tapestried things are disclosed. Suzie is not tapestried.", "logic": "\nAnechoic(suzie)\nDisclosed(biddy)\nAnechoic(biddy)\nforall x (Endogenic(x) and Anechoic(x) -> Parched(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) and Disclosed(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nforall x (Tapestried(x) and Parched(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) and Anechoic(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nAnechoic(suzie) and Hiemal(suzie) -> Parched(suzie)\nforall x (Disclosed(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Tapestried(x) and Disclosed(x) -> Anechoic(x))\nforall x (Parched(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Disclosed(x))\n\nnot Tapestried(suzie)\n\nforall x (Hiemal(x) and Disclosed(x) -> Tapestried(x)) <- forall x (Parched(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Disclosed(x)) <- forall x (Endogenic(x) and Anechoic(x) -> Tapestried(x)) <- forall x (Tapestried(x) and Parched(x) -> Endogenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Kathe is saved. Merry is echoing. Merry is saved. All known, saved things are editorial. If something is solo and echoing then it is promising. Quiet, editorial things are known. Cold, saved things are promising. If Kathe is saved and Kathe is solo then Kathe is editorial. If something is echoing then it is solo. If something is promising and echoing then it is saved. Big, promising things are echoing. Merry is white.", "logic": "\nSaved(kathe)\nEchoing(merry)\nSaved(merry)\nforall x (Known(x) and Saved(x) -> Editorial(x))\nforall x (Solo(x) and Echoing(x) -> Promising(x))\nforall x (Promising(x) and Editorial(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Known(x) and Saved(x) -> Promising(x))\nSaved(kathe) and Solo(kathe) -> Editorial(kathe)\nforall x (Echoing(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Promising(x) and Echoing(x) -> Saved(x))\nforall x (Editorial(x) and Promising(x) -> Echoing(x))\n\nWhite(merry)\n\nWhite(merry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2350"} {"premises": "Julietta is vascular. Julietta is combined. Julietta is shiftless. Laurene is lusitanian. Laurene is raucous. Poppy is irregular. Poppy is ripened. Poppy is combined. Poppy is raucous. Poppy is shiftless. All combined, irregular people are raucous. All ripened people are lusitanian. Cold, combined people are shiftless. Nice, vascular people are shiftless. All ripened people are vascular. Nice people are vascular. Poppy is irregular.", "logic": "\nVascular(julietta)\nCombined(julietta)\nShiftless(julietta)\nLusitanian(laurene)\nRaucous(laurene)\nIrregular(poppy)\nRipened(poppy)\nCombined(poppy)\nRaucous(poppy)\nShiftless(poppy)\nforall x (Combined(x) and Irregular(x) -> Raucous(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Lusitanian(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) and Combined(x) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Lusitanian(x) and Vascular(x) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Vascular(x))\nforall x (Lusitanian(x) -> Vascular(x))\n\nIrregular(poppy)\n\ntherefore Irregular(poppy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Cleopatra is busy. Cleopatra is blighted. Cleopatra is measured. Dee is hooflike. Dee is nineteenth. Row is pilous. Row is humdrum. Row is blighted. Row is nineteenth. Row is measured. All blighted, pilous people are nineteenth. All humdrum people are hooflike. Cold, blighted people are measured. Nice, busy people are measured. All humdrum people are busy. Nice people are busy. Row is not nineteenth.", "logic": "\nBusy(cleopatra)\nBlighted(cleopatra)\nMeasured(cleopatra)\nHooflike(dee)\nNineteenth(dee)\nPilous(row)\nHumdrum(row)\nBlighted(row)\nNineteenth(row)\nMeasured(row)\nforall x (Blighted(x) and Pilous(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Humdrum(x) -> Hooflike(x))\nforall x (Pilous(x) and Blighted(x) -> Measured(x))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and Busy(x) -> Measured(x))\nforall x (Humdrum(x) -> Busy(x))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) -> Busy(x))\n\nnot Nineteenth(row)\n\ntherefore Nineteenth(row)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Karon is egoistic. Karon is silverish. Karon is thundery. Dee is covalent. Dee is clinched. Stacee is diazo. Stacee is epidermic. Stacee is silverish. Stacee is clinched. Stacee is thundery. All silverish, diazo people are clinched. All epidermic people are covalent. Cold, silverish people are thundery. Nice, egoistic people are thundery. All epidermic people are egoistic. Nice people are egoistic. Dee is egoistic.", "logic": "\nEgoistic(karon)\nSilverish(karon)\nThundery(karon)\nCovalent(dee)\nClinched(dee)\nDiazo(stacee)\nEpidermic(stacee)\nSilverish(stacee)\nClinched(stacee)\nThundery(stacee)\nforall x (Silverish(x) and Diazo(x) -> Clinched(x))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) -> Covalent(x))\nforall x (Diazo(x) and Silverish(x) -> Thundery(x))\nforall x (Covalent(x) and Egoistic(x) -> Thundery(x))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Covalent(x) -> Egoistic(x))\n\nEgoistic(dee)\n\nCovalent(dee) and forall x (Covalent(x) -> Egoistic(x)) -> therefore Egoistic(dee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Kathryne is impolite. Kathryne is eventful. Kathryne is petty. Alyss is craggy. Alyss is center. Margalo is tensed. Margalo is overt. Margalo is eventful. Margalo is center. Margalo is petty. All eventful, tensed people are center. All overt people are craggy. Cold, eventful people are petty. Nice, impolite people are petty. All overt people are impolite. Nice people are impolite. Margalo is not craggy.", "logic": "\nImpolite(kathryne)\nEventful(kathryne)\nPetty(kathryne)\nCraggy(alyss)\nCenter(alyss)\nTensed(margalo)\nOvert(margalo)\nEventful(margalo)\nCenter(margalo)\nPetty(margalo)\nforall x (Eventful(x) and Tensed(x) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Overt(x) -> Craggy(x))\nforall x (Tensed(x) and Eventful(x) -> Petty(x))\nforall x (Craggy(x) and Impolite(x) -> Petty(x))\nforall x (Overt(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Craggy(x) -> Impolite(x))\n\nnot Craggy(margalo)\n\nOvert(margalo) and forall x (Overt(x) -> Craggy(x)) -> therefore Craggy(margalo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Andri is amebous. Andri is bronzy. Andri is dyspeptic. Dudley is shelvy. Dudley is speckled. Theressa is holy. Theressa is tenderized. Theressa is bronzy. Theressa is speckled. Theressa is dyspeptic. All bronzy, holy people are speckled. All tenderized people are shelvy. Cold, bronzy people are dyspeptic. Nice, amebous people are dyspeptic. All tenderized people are amebous. Nice people are amebous. Dudley is dyspeptic.", "logic": "\nAmebous(andri)\nBronzy(andri)\nDyspeptic(andri)\nShelvy(dudley)\nSpeckled(dudley)\nHoly(theressa)\nTenderized(theressa)\nBronzy(theressa)\nSpeckled(theressa)\nDyspeptic(theressa)\nforall x (Bronzy(x) and Holy(x) -> Speckled(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Holy(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Dyspeptic(x))\nforall x (Shelvy(x) and Amebous(x) -> Dyspeptic(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Amebous(x))\nforall x (Shelvy(x) -> Amebous(x))\n\nDyspeptic(dudley)\n\nShelvy(dudley) and forall x (Shelvy(x) -> Amebous(x)) -> therefore Amebous(dudley) Shelvy(dudley) and Amebous(dudley) and forall x (Shelvy(x) and Amebous(x) -> Dyspeptic(x)) -> therefore Dyspeptic(dudley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Marketa is unlikeable. Marketa is psychotic. Marketa is eery. Vere is fulsome. Vere is approving. Manish is apteral. Manish is imbecilic. Manish is psychotic. Manish is approving. Manish is eery. All psychotic, apteral people are approving. All imbecilic people are fulsome. Cold, psychotic people are eery. Nice, unlikeable people are eery. All imbecilic people are unlikeable. Nice people are unlikeable. Vere is not eery.", "logic": "\nUnlikeable(marketa)\nPsychotic(marketa)\nEery(marketa)\nFulsome(vere)\nApproving(vere)\nApteral(manish)\nImbecilic(manish)\nPsychotic(manish)\nApproving(manish)\nEery(manish)\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and Apteral(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) and Psychotic(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Fulsome(x) and Unlikeable(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) -> Unlikeable(x))\nforall x (Fulsome(x) -> Unlikeable(x))\n\nnot Eery(vere)\n\nFulsome(vere) and forall x (Fulsome(x) -> Unlikeable(x)) -> therefore Unlikeable(vere) Fulsome(vere) and Unlikeable(vere) and forall x (Fulsome(x) and Unlikeable(x) -> Eery(x)) -> therefore Eery(vere)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Caty is pilotless. Caty is dummy. Caty is refractory. Torey is stratified. Torey is unredeemed. Kipp is sartorial. Kipp is unbalanced. Kipp is dummy. Kipp is unredeemed. Kipp is refractory. All dummy, sartorial people are unredeemed. All unbalanced people are stratified. Cold, dummy people are refractory. Nice, pilotless people are refractory. All unbalanced people are pilotless. Nice people are pilotless. Caty is not stratified.", "logic": "\nPilotless(caty)\nDummy(caty)\nRefractory(caty)\nStratified(torey)\nUnredeemed(torey)\nSartorial(kipp)\nUnbalanced(kipp)\nDummy(kipp)\nUnredeemed(kipp)\nRefractory(kipp)\nforall x (Dummy(x) and Sartorial(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) -> Stratified(x))\nforall x (Sartorial(x) and Dummy(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) and Pilotless(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) -> Pilotless(x))\n\nnot Stratified(caty)\n\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) -> Stratified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Remington is normative. Remington is unplayful. Remington is ferrous. Farley is raunchy. Farley is pampering. Kaycee is multiphase. Kaycee is analogue. Kaycee is unplayful. Kaycee is pampering. Kaycee is ferrous. All unplayful, multiphase people are pampering. All analogue people are raunchy. Cold, unplayful people are ferrous. Nice, normative people are ferrous. All analogue people are normative. Nice people are normative. Remington is pampering.", "logic": "\nNormative(remington)\nUnplayful(remington)\nFerrous(remington)\nRaunchy(farley)\nPampering(farley)\nMultiphase(kaycee)\nAnalogue(kaycee)\nUnplayful(kaycee)\nPampering(kaycee)\nFerrous(kaycee)\nforall x (Unplayful(x) and Multiphase(x) -> Pampering(x))\nforall x (Analogue(x) -> Raunchy(x))\nforall x (Multiphase(x) and Unplayful(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) and Normative(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Analogue(x) -> Normative(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Normative(x))\n\nPampering(remington)\n\nforall x (Unplayful(x) and Multiphase(x) -> Pampering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Bryon is unscripted. Bryon is vanilla. Bryon is potent. Carmine is summery. Carmine is tempered. Peter is inflected. Peter is austral. Peter is vanilla. Peter is tempered. Peter is potent. All vanilla, inflected people are tempered. All austral people are summery. Cold, vanilla people are potent. Nice, unscripted people are potent. All austral people are unscripted. Nice people are unscripted. Bryon is not austral.", "logic": "\nUnscripted(bryon)\nVanilla(bryon)\nPotent(bryon)\nSummery(carmine)\nTempered(carmine)\nInflected(peter)\nAustral(peter)\nVanilla(peter)\nTempered(peter)\nPotent(peter)\nforall x (Vanilla(x) and Inflected(x) -> Tempered(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Summery(x))\nforall x (Inflected(x) and Vanilla(x) -> Potent(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) and Unscripted(x) -> Potent(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Unscripted(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Unscripted(x))\n\nnot Austral(bryon)\n\nnot Austral(bryon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Mildred is edwardian. Mildred is unmixed. Mildred is kurdish. Jeffry is unromantic. Jeffry is multiplex. Sibelle is lxxxvi. Sibelle is treed. Sibelle is unmixed. Sibelle is multiplex. Sibelle is kurdish. All unmixed, lxxxvi people are multiplex. All treed people are unromantic. Cold, unmixed people are kurdish. Nice, edwardian people are kurdish. All treed people are edwardian. Nice people are edwardian. Jeffry is unmixed.", "logic": "\nEdwardian(mildred)\nUnmixed(mildred)\nKurdish(mildred)\nUnromantic(jeffry)\nMultiplex(jeffry)\nLxxxvi(sibelle)\nTreed(sibelle)\nUnmixed(sibelle)\nMultiplex(sibelle)\nKurdish(sibelle)\nforall x (Unmixed(x) and Lxxxvi(x) -> Multiplex(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Lxxxvi(x) and Unmixed(x) -> Kurdish(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) and Edwardian(x) -> Kurdish(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Edwardian(x))\n\nUnmixed(jeffry)\n\nUnmixed(jeffry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Morris is abysmal. Morris is livid. Morris is vesicular. Cherilynn is precative. Cherilynn is snakelike. Cherrita is climatic. Cherrita is illegal. Cherrita is livid. Cherrita is snakelike. Cherrita is vesicular. All livid, climatic people are snakelike. All illegal people are precative. Cold, livid people are vesicular. Nice, abysmal people are vesicular. All illegal people are abysmal. Nice people are abysmal. Cherilynn is not illegal.", "logic": "\nAbysmal(morris)\nLivid(morris)\nVesicular(morris)\nPrecative(cherilynn)\nSnakelike(cherilynn)\nClimatic(cherrita)\nIllegal(cherrita)\nLivid(cherrita)\nSnakelike(cherrita)\nVesicular(cherrita)\nforall x (Livid(x) and Climatic(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nforall x (Illegal(x) -> Precative(x))\nforall x (Climatic(x) and Livid(x) -> Vesicular(x))\nforall x (Precative(x) and Abysmal(x) -> Vesicular(x))\nforall x (Illegal(x) -> Abysmal(x))\nforall x (Precative(x) -> Abysmal(x))\n\nnot Illegal(cherilynn)\n\nnot Illegal(cherilynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Floria is volcanic. Floria is nonechoic. Floria is tangential. Christa is melanesian. Christa is unbarred. Karleen is colorfast. Karleen is unforested. Karleen is nonechoic. Karleen is unbarred. Karleen is tangential. All nonechoic, colorfast people are unbarred. All unforested people are melanesian. Cold, nonechoic people are tangential. Nice, volcanic people are tangential. All unforested people are volcanic. Nice people are volcanic. Floria is colorfast.", "logic": "\nVolcanic(floria)\nNonechoic(floria)\nTangential(floria)\nMelanesian(christa)\nUnbarred(christa)\nColorfast(karleen)\nUnforested(karleen)\nNonechoic(karleen)\nUnbarred(karleen)\nTangential(karleen)\nforall x (Nonechoic(x) and Colorfast(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Unforested(x) -> Melanesian(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) and Nonechoic(x) -> Tangential(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) and Volcanic(x) -> Tangential(x))\nforall x (Unforested(x) -> Volcanic(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) -> Volcanic(x))\n\nColorfast(floria)\n\nColorfast(floria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-131"} {"premises": "Dwain is pseudo. Dwain is roaring. Dwain is not cagey. Dwain is rejoicing. Melony is boisterous. Melony is roaring. Melony is outermost. Harriet is boisterous. Harriet is cagey. Aggy is boisterous. All pseudo people are jumbo. Quiet people are pseudo. Dwain is rejoicing.", "logic": "\nPseudo(dwain)\nRoaring(dwain)\nnot Cagey(dwain)\nRejoicing(dwain)\nBoisterous(melony)\nRoaring(melony)\nOutermost(melony)\nBoisterous(harriet)\nCagey(harriet)\nBoisterous(aggy)\nforall x (Pseudo(x) -> Jumbo(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) -> Pseudo(x))\n\nRejoicing(dwain)\n\ntherefore Rejoicing(dwain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Traver is sulphuric. Traver is geodetic. Traver is not stubby. Traver is whitish. Vincent is unkept. Vincent is geodetic. Vincent is plus. Prentiss is unkept. Prentiss is stubby. Jerri is unkept. All sulphuric people are unrhymed. Quiet people are sulphuric. Traver is stubby.", "logic": "\nSulphuric(traver)\nGeodetic(traver)\nnot Stubby(traver)\nWhitish(traver)\nUnkept(vincent)\nGeodetic(vincent)\nPlus(vincent)\nUnkept(prentiss)\nStubby(prentiss)\nUnkept(jerri)\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\nforall x (Stubby(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\n\nStubby(traver)\n\ntherefore not Stubby(traver)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Pierson is uninvited. Pierson is unsent. Pierson is not managerial. Pierson is stalemated. Rebeca is acentric. Rebeca is unsent. Rebeca is prudential. Kerri is acentric. Kerri is managerial. Harli is acentric. All uninvited people are sensate. Quiet people are uninvited. Pierson is sensate.", "logic": "\nUninvited(pierson)\nUnsent(pierson)\nnot Managerial(pierson)\nStalemated(pierson)\nAcentric(rebeca)\nUnsent(rebeca)\nPrudential(rebeca)\nAcentric(kerri)\nManagerial(kerri)\nAcentric(harli)\nforall x (Uninvited(x) -> Sensate(x))\nforall x (Managerial(x) -> Uninvited(x))\n\nSensate(pierson)\n\nUninvited(pierson) and forall x (Uninvited(x) -> Sensate(x)) -> therefore Sensate(pierson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Robinett is downscale. Robinett is stereo. Robinett is not unseeded. Robinett is bellbottom. Jodee is spiffy. Jodee is stereo. Jodee is singsong. Beulah is spiffy. Beulah is unseeded. Guillema is spiffy. All downscale people are unwooded. Quiet people are downscale. Beulah is not downscale.", "logic": "\nDownscale(robinett)\nStereo(robinett)\nnot Unseeded(robinett)\nBellbottom(robinett)\nSpiffy(jodee)\nStereo(jodee)\nSingsong(jodee)\nSpiffy(beulah)\nUnseeded(beulah)\nSpiffy(guillema)\nforall x (Downscale(x) -> Unwooded(x))\nforall x (Unseeded(x) -> Downscale(x))\n\nnot Downscale(beulah)\n\nUnseeded(beulah) and forall x (Unseeded(x) -> Downscale(x)) -> therefore Downscale(beulah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Briteny is alveolate. Briteny is urethral. Briteny is not monistic. Briteny is dantean. Cecilla is undeserved. Cecilla is urethral. Cecilla is paschal. Leigh is undeserved. Leigh is monistic. Northrup is undeserved. All alveolate people are boon. Quiet people are alveolate. Leigh is boon.", "logic": "\nAlveolate(briteny)\nUrethral(briteny)\nnot Monistic(briteny)\nDantean(briteny)\nUndeserved(cecilla)\nUrethral(cecilla)\nPaschal(cecilla)\nUndeserved(leigh)\nMonistic(leigh)\nUndeserved(northrup)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) -> Boon(x))\nforall x (Monistic(x) -> Alveolate(x))\n\nBoon(leigh)\n\nMonistic(leigh) and forall x (Monistic(x) -> Alveolate(x)) -> therefore Alveolate(leigh) Alveolate(leigh) and forall x (Alveolate(x) -> Boon(x)) -> therefore Boon(leigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Lulita is marmoreal. Lulita is alimental. Lulita is not expendable. Lulita is untapped. Tedrick is sickish. Tedrick is alimental. Tedrick is admittable. Lindie is sickish. Lindie is expendable. Claudio is sickish. All marmoreal people are waking. Quiet people are marmoreal. Lindie is not waking.", "logic": "\nMarmoreal(lulita)\nAlimental(lulita)\nnot Expendable(lulita)\nUntapped(lulita)\nSickish(tedrick)\nAlimental(tedrick)\nAdmittable(tedrick)\nSickish(lindie)\nExpendable(lindie)\nSickish(claudio)\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Waking(x))\nforall x (Expendable(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\n\nnot Waking(lindie)\n\nExpendable(lindie) and forall x (Expendable(x) -> Marmoreal(x)) -> therefore Marmoreal(lindie) Marmoreal(lindie) and forall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Waking(x)) -> therefore Waking(lindie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Ferdie is invincible. Ferdie is charnel. Ferdie is not adamantine. Ferdie is unverified. Kalina is considered. Kalina is charnel. Kalina is unparallel. Clio is considered. Clio is adamantine. Gwenny is considered. All invincible people are reasonless. Quiet people are invincible. Gwenny is not invincible.", "logic": "\nInvincible(ferdie)\nCharnel(ferdie)\nnot Adamantine(ferdie)\nUnverified(ferdie)\nConsidered(kalina)\nCharnel(kalina)\nUnparallel(kalina)\nConsidered(clio)\nAdamantine(clio)\nConsidered(gwenny)\nforall x (Invincible(x) -> Reasonless(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Invincible(x))\n\nnot Invincible(gwenny)\n\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Invincible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Carlee is republican. Carlee is ninety. Carlee is not tabular. Carlee is global. Hailee is pestilent. Hailee is ninety. Hailee is figural. Jimmie is pestilent. Jimmie is tabular. Adoree is pestilent. All republican people are given. Quiet people are republican. Hailee is republican.", "logic": "\nRepublican(carlee)\nNinety(carlee)\nnot Tabular(carlee)\nGlobal(carlee)\nPestilent(hailee)\nNinety(hailee)\nFigural(hailee)\nPestilent(jimmie)\nTabular(jimmie)\nPestilent(adoree)\nforall x (Republican(x) -> Given(x))\nforall x (Tabular(x) -> Republican(x))\n\nRepublican(hailee)\n\nforall x (Tabular(x) -> Republican(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Ian is stygian. Ian is offhand. Ian is not autumnal. Ian is outcast. Thomasa is arachnoid. Thomasa is offhand. Thomasa is endurable. Marlyn is arachnoid. Marlyn is autumnal. Eryn is arachnoid. All stygian people are mercenary. Quiet people are stygian. Eryn is not mercenary.", "logic": "\nStygian(ian)\nOffhand(ian)\nnot Autumnal(ian)\nOutcast(ian)\nArachnoid(thomasa)\nOffhand(thomasa)\nEndurable(thomasa)\nArachnoid(marlyn)\nAutumnal(marlyn)\nArachnoid(eryn)\nforall x (Stygian(x) -> Mercenary(x))\nforall x (Autumnal(x) -> Stygian(x))\n\nnot Mercenary(eryn)\n\nforall x (Stygian(x) -> Mercenary(x)) <- forall x (Autumnal(x) -> Stygian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Pia is algonquin. Pia is isolating. Pia is not keyed. Pia is risen. Garcon is wholesome. Garcon is isolating. Garcon is mesodermal. Bernie is wholesome. Bernie is keyed. Sella is wholesome. All algonquin people are hoarse. Quiet people are algonquin. Sella is keyed.", "logic": "\nAlgonquin(pia)\nIsolating(pia)\nnot Keyed(pia)\nRisen(pia)\nWholesome(garcon)\nIsolating(garcon)\nMesodermal(garcon)\nWholesome(bernie)\nKeyed(bernie)\nWholesome(sella)\nforall x (Algonquin(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Algonquin(x))\n\nKeyed(sella)\n\nKeyed(sella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Suzy is elite. Suzy is suspected. Suzy is not drenched. Suzy is slanted. Kalina is maculate. Kalina is suspected. Kalina is titled. Violetta is maculate. Violetta is drenched. Teena is maculate. All elite people are unfledged. Quiet people are elite. Teena is not slanted.", "logic": "\nElite(suzy)\nSuspected(suzy)\nnot Drenched(suzy)\nSlanted(suzy)\nMaculate(kalina)\nSuspected(kalina)\nTitled(kalina)\nMaculate(violetta)\nDrenched(violetta)\nMaculate(teena)\nforall x (Elite(x) -> Unfledged(x))\nforall x (Drenched(x) -> Elite(x))\n\nnot Slanted(teena)\n\nnot Slanted(teena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Pierrette is pleural. Pierrette is stoppable. Pierrette is not untethered. Pierrette is regardful. Eduardo is climatic. Eduardo is stoppable. Eduardo is leakproof. Garnette is climatic. Garnette is untethered. Anton is climatic. All pleural people are airsick. Quiet people are pleural. Pierrette is climatic.", "logic": "\nPleural(pierrette)\nStoppable(pierrette)\nnot Untethered(pierrette)\nRegardful(pierrette)\nClimatic(eduardo)\nStoppable(eduardo)\nLeakproof(eduardo)\nClimatic(garnette)\nUntethered(garnette)\nClimatic(anton)\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> Airsick(x))\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Pleural(x))\n\nClimatic(pierrette)\n\nClimatic(pierrette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The marcie ramble the ellen. The marcie ramble the minnie. The marcie refresh the minnie. The marcie except the ellen. The ellen ramble the minnie. The ellen refresh the marcie. The ellen refresh the minnie. The ellen except the marcie. The ellen does not see the minnie. The minnie does not chase the ellen. The minnie refresh the marcie. The minnie except the ellen. If someone is cormose and they need the minnie then they are not groomed. If someone except the marcie then they are cormose. The ellen does not see the minnie.", "logic": "\nRamble(marcie, ellen)\nRamble(marcie, minnie)\nRefresh(marcie, minnie)\nExcept(marcie, ellen)\nRamble(ellen, minnie)\nRefresh(ellen, marcie)\nRefresh(ellen, minnie)\nExcept(ellen, marcie)\nnot Except(ellen, minnie)\nnot Ramble(minnie, ellen)\nRefresh(minnie, marcie)\nExcept(minnie, ellen)\nforall x (Cormose(x) and Refresh(x, minnie) -> not Groomed(x))\nforall x (Except(x, marcie) -> Cormose(x))\n\nnot Except(ellen, minnie)\n\ntherefore not Except(ellen, minnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The berke climax the elyn. The berke climax the elna. The berke shaft the elna. The berke insist the elyn. The elyn climax the elna. The elyn shaft the berke. The elyn shaft the elna. The elyn insist the berke. The elyn does not see the elna. The elna does not chase the elyn. The elna shaft the berke. The elna insist the elyn. If someone is assured and they need the elna then they are not rainy. If someone insist the berke then they are assured. The berke does not chase the elna.", "logic": "\nClimax(berke, elyn)\nClimax(berke, elna)\nShaft(berke, elna)\nInsist(berke, elyn)\nClimax(elyn, elna)\nShaft(elyn, berke)\nShaft(elyn, elna)\nInsist(elyn, berke)\nnot Insist(elyn, elna)\nnot Climax(elna, elyn)\nShaft(elna, berke)\nInsist(elna, elyn)\nforall x (Assured(x) and Shaft(x, elna) -> not Rainy(x))\nforall x (Insist(x, berke) -> Assured(x))\n\nnot Climax(berke, elna)\n\ntherefore Climax(berke, elna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The keenan pander the jobina. The keenan pander the roger. The keenan evert the roger. The keenan amount the jobina. The jobina pander the roger. The jobina evert the keenan. The jobina evert the roger. The jobina amount the keenan. The jobina does not see the roger. The roger does not chase the jobina. The roger evert the keenan. The roger amount the jobina. If someone is moneran and they need the roger then they are not tasmanian. If someone amount the keenan then they are moneran. The jobina is moneran.", "logic": "\nPander(keenan, jobina)\nPander(keenan, roger)\nEvert(keenan, roger)\nAmount(keenan, jobina)\nPander(jobina, roger)\nEvert(jobina, keenan)\nEvert(jobina, roger)\nAmount(jobina, keenan)\nnot Amount(jobina, roger)\nnot Pander(roger, jobina)\nEvert(roger, keenan)\nAmount(roger, jobina)\nforall x (Moneran(x) and Evert(x, roger) -> not Tasmanian(x))\nforall x (Amount(x, keenan) -> Moneran(x))\n\nMoneran(jobina)\n\nAmount(jobina, keenan) and forall x (Amount(x, keenan) -> Moneran(x)) -> therefore Moneran(jobina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The liane refer the lust. The liane refer the ketti. The liane dehumanize the ketti. The liane helm the lust. The lust refer the ketti. The lust dehumanize the liane. The lust dehumanize the ketti. The lust helm the liane. The lust does not see the ketti. The ketti does not chase the lust. The ketti dehumanize the liane. The ketti helm the lust. If someone is hagridden and they need the ketti then they are not only. If someone helm the liane then they are hagridden. The lust is not hagridden.", "logic": "\nRefer(liane, lust)\nRefer(liane, ketti)\nDehumanize(liane, ketti)\nHelm(liane, lust)\nRefer(lust, ketti)\nDehumanize(lust, liane)\nDehumanize(lust, ketti)\nHelm(lust, liane)\nnot Helm(lust, ketti)\nnot Refer(ketti, lust)\nDehumanize(ketti, liane)\nHelm(ketti, lust)\nforall x (Hagridden(x) and Dehumanize(x, ketti) -> not Only(x))\nforall x (Helm(x, liane) -> Hagridden(x))\n\nnot Hagridden(lust)\n\nHelm(lust, liane) and forall x (Helm(x, liane) -> Hagridden(x)) -> therefore Hagridden(lust)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The philippe bark the merril. The philippe bark the smitty. The philippe purport the smitty. The philippe right the merril. The merril bark the smitty. The merril purport the philippe. The merril purport the smitty. The merril right the philippe. The merril does not see the smitty. The smitty does not chase the merril. The smitty purport the philippe. The smitty right the merril. If someone is alated and they need the smitty then they are not grown. If someone right the philippe then they are alated. The merril is not grown.", "logic": "\nBark(philippe, merril)\nBark(philippe, smitty)\nPurport(philippe, smitty)\nRight(philippe, merril)\nBark(merril, smitty)\nPurport(merril, philippe)\nPurport(merril, smitty)\nRight(merril, philippe)\nnot Right(merril, smitty)\nnot Bark(smitty, merril)\nPurport(smitty, philippe)\nRight(smitty, merril)\nforall x (Alated(x) and Purport(x, smitty) -> not Grown(x))\nforall x (Right(x, philippe) -> Alated(x))\n\nnot Grown(merril)\n\nRight(merril, philippe) and forall x (Right(x, philippe) -> Alated(x)) -> therefore Alated(merril) Alated(merril) and Purport(merril, smitty) and forall x (Alated(x) and Purport(x, smitty) -> not Grown(x)) -> therefore not Grown(merril)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The katleen ideate the kristal. The katleen ideate the gladys. The katleen relativize the gladys. The katleen bottlefeed the kristal. The kristal ideate the gladys. The kristal relativize the katleen. The kristal relativize the gladys. The kristal bottlefeed the katleen. The kristal does not see the gladys. The gladys does not chase the kristal. The gladys relativize the katleen. The gladys bottlefeed the kristal. If someone is unbarred and they need the gladys then they are not fourteenth. If someone bottlefeed the katleen then they are unbarred. The kristal is fourteenth.", "logic": "\nIdeate(katleen, kristal)\nIdeate(katleen, gladys)\nRelativize(katleen, gladys)\nBottlefeed(katleen, kristal)\nIdeate(kristal, gladys)\nRelativize(kristal, katleen)\nRelativize(kristal, gladys)\nBottlefeed(kristal, katleen)\nnot Bottlefeed(kristal, gladys)\nnot Ideate(gladys, kristal)\nRelativize(gladys, katleen)\nBottlefeed(gladys, kristal)\nforall x (Unbarred(x) and Relativize(x, gladys) -> not Fourteenth(x))\nforall x (Bottlefeed(x, katleen) -> Unbarred(x))\n\nFourteenth(kristal)\n\nBottlefeed(kristal, katleen) and forall x (Bottlefeed(x, katleen) -> Unbarred(x)) -> therefore Unbarred(kristal) Unbarred(kristal) and Relativize(kristal, gladys) and forall x (Unbarred(x) and Relativize(x, gladys) -> not Fourteenth(x)) -> therefore not Fourteenth(kristal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The isabel reseat the fleurette. The isabel reseat the frederic. The isabel misplay the frederic. The isabel bivouac the fleurette. The fleurette reseat the frederic. The fleurette misplay the isabel. The fleurette misplay the frederic. The fleurette bivouac the isabel. The fleurette does not see the frederic. The frederic does not chase the fleurette. The frederic misplay the isabel. The frederic bivouac the fleurette. If someone is verified and they need the frederic then they are not verbalised. If someone bivouac the isabel then they are verified. The isabel is not verified.", "logic": "\nReseat(isabel, fleurette)\nReseat(isabel, frederic)\nMisplay(isabel, frederic)\nBivouac(isabel, fleurette)\nReseat(fleurette, frederic)\nMisplay(fleurette, isabel)\nMisplay(fleurette, frederic)\nBivouac(fleurette, isabel)\nnot Bivouac(fleurette, frederic)\nnot Reseat(frederic, fleurette)\nMisplay(frederic, isabel)\nBivouac(frederic, fleurette)\nforall x (Verified(x) and Misplay(x, frederic) -> not Verbalised(x))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, isabel) -> Verified(x))\n\nnot Verified(isabel)\n\nforall x (Bivouac(x, isabel) -> Verified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The velvet affix the rona. The velvet affix the fanchette. The velvet jabber the fanchette. The velvet sass the rona. The rona affix the fanchette. The rona jabber the velvet. The rona jabber the fanchette. The rona sass the velvet. The rona does not see the fanchette. The fanchette does not chase the rona. The fanchette jabber the velvet. The fanchette sass the rona. If someone is ministrant and they need the fanchette then they are not tactual. If someone sass the velvet then they are ministrant. The fanchette is ministrant.", "logic": "\nAffix(velvet, rona)\nAffix(velvet, fanchette)\nJabber(velvet, fanchette)\nSass(velvet, rona)\nAffix(rona, fanchette)\nJabber(rona, velvet)\nJabber(rona, fanchette)\nSass(rona, velvet)\nnot Sass(rona, fanchette)\nnot Affix(fanchette, rona)\nJabber(fanchette, velvet)\nSass(fanchette, rona)\nforall x (Ministrant(x) and Jabber(x, fanchette) -> not Tactual(x))\nforall x (Sass(x, velvet) -> Ministrant(x))\n\nMinistrant(fanchette)\n\nforall x (Sass(x, velvet) -> Ministrant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The camella utilize the olwen. The camella utilize the jonah. The camella second the jonah. The camella comminate the olwen. The olwen utilize the jonah. The olwen second the camella. The olwen second the jonah. The olwen comminate the camella. The olwen does not see the jonah. The jonah does not chase the olwen. The jonah second the camella. The jonah comminate the olwen. If someone is noiseless and they need the jonah then they are not squirting. If someone comminate the camella then they are noiseless. The camella does not see the jonah.", "logic": "\nUtilize(camella, olwen)\nUtilize(camella, jonah)\nSecond(camella, jonah)\nComminate(camella, olwen)\nUtilize(olwen, jonah)\nSecond(olwen, camella)\nSecond(olwen, jonah)\nComminate(olwen, camella)\nnot Comminate(olwen, jonah)\nnot Utilize(jonah, olwen)\nSecond(jonah, camella)\nComminate(jonah, olwen)\nforall x (Noiseless(x) and Second(x, jonah) -> not Squirting(x))\nforall x (Comminate(x, camella) -> Noiseless(x))\n\nnot Comminate(camella, jonah)\n\nnot Comminate(camella, jonah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The maye shelter the nike. The maye shelter the lavena. The maye medicine the lavena. The maye dung the nike. The nike shelter the lavena. The nike medicine the maye. The nike medicine the lavena. The nike dung the maye. The nike does not see the lavena. The lavena does not chase the nike. The lavena medicine the maye. The lavena dung the nike. If someone is kindled and they need the lavena then they are not unraised. If someone dung the maye then they are kindled. The maye dung the maye.", "logic": "\nShelter(maye, nike)\nShelter(maye, lavena)\nMedicine(maye, lavena)\nDung(maye, nike)\nShelter(nike, lavena)\nMedicine(nike, maye)\nMedicine(nike, lavena)\nDung(nike, maye)\nnot Dung(nike, lavena)\nnot Shelter(lavena, nike)\nMedicine(lavena, maye)\nDung(lavena, nike)\nforall x (Kindled(x) and Medicine(x, lavena) -> not Unraised(x))\nforall x (Dung(x, maye) -> Kindled(x))\n\nDung(maye, maye)\n\nDung(maye, maye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The erda recede the una. The erda recede the ham. The erda crick the ham. The erda drill the una. The una recede the ham. The una crick the erda. The una crick the ham. The una drill the erda. The una does not see the ham. The ham does not chase the una. The ham crick the erda. The ham drill the una. If someone is taupe and they need the ham then they are not fictile. If someone drill the erda then they are taupe. The ham does not see the ham.", "logic": "\nRecede(erda, una)\nRecede(erda, ham)\nCrick(erda, ham)\nDrill(erda, una)\nRecede(una, ham)\nCrick(una, erda)\nCrick(una, ham)\nDrill(una, erda)\nnot Drill(una, ham)\nnot Recede(ham, una)\nCrick(ham, erda)\nDrill(ham, una)\nforall x (Taupe(x) and Crick(x, ham) -> not Fictile(x))\nforall x (Drill(x, erda) -> Taupe(x))\n\nnot Drill(ham, ham)\n\nnot Drill(ham, ham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The adey minister the toma. The adey minister the roby. The adey flavor the roby. The adey plow the toma. The toma minister the roby. The toma flavor the adey. The toma flavor the roby. The toma plow the adey. The toma does not see the roby. The roby does not chase the toma. The roby flavor the adey. The roby plow the toma. If someone is rainy and they need the roby then they are not pouched. If someone plow the adey then they are rainy. The adey minister the adey.", "logic": "\nMinister(adey, toma)\nMinister(adey, roby)\nFlavor(adey, roby)\nPlow(adey, toma)\nMinister(toma, roby)\nFlavor(toma, adey)\nFlavor(toma, roby)\nPlow(toma, adey)\nnot Plow(toma, roby)\nnot Minister(roby, toma)\nFlavor(roby, adey)\nPlow(roby, toma)\nforall x (Rainy(x) and Flavor(x, roby) -> not Pouched(x))\nforall x (Plow(x, adey) -> Rainy(x))\n\nMinister(adey, adey)\n\nMinister(adey, adey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1606"} {"premises": "The karel is nonunion. The karel is bust. The karel is previous. If the karel is moderating then the karel is fatalistic. Big things are moderating. The karel is nonunion.", "logic": "\nNonunion(karel)\nBust(karel)\nPrevious(karel)\nModerating(karel) -> Fatalistic(karel)\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> Moderating(x))\n\nNonunion(karel)\n\ntherefore Nonunion(karel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "The tamar is unsworn. The tamar is covered. The tamar is banner. If the tamar is sprightly then the tamar is irritating. Big things are sprightly. The tamar is not banner.", "logic": "\nUnsworn(tamar)\nCovered(tamar)\nBanner(tamar)\nSprightly(tamar) -> Irritating(tamar)\nforall x (Unsworn(x) -> Sprightly(x))\n\nnot Banner(tamar)\n\ntherefore Banner(tamar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "The lothar is bolshevik. The lothar is taiwanese. The lothar is choleric. If the lothar is cabalistic then the lothar is liliaceous. Big things are cabalistic. The lothar is cabalistic.", "logic": "\nBolshevik(lothar)\nTaiwanese(lothar)\nCholeric(lothar)\nCabalistic(lothar) -> Liliaceous(lothar)\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\n\nCabalistic(lothar)\n\nBolshevik(lothar) and forall x (Bolshevik(x) -> Cabalistic(x)) -> therefore Cabalistic(lothar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "The garrott is clothed. The garrott is laced. The garrott is right. If the garrott is ghostlike then the garrott is telltale. Big things are ghostlike. The garrott is not ghostlike.", "logic": "\nClothed(garrott)\nLaced(garrott)\nRight(garrott)\nGhostlike(garrott) -> Telltale(garrott)\nforall x (Clothed(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\n\nnot Ghostlike(garrott)\n\nClothed(garrott) and forall x (Clothed(x) -> Ghostlike(x)) -> therefore Ghostlike(garrott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "The nilson is indrawn. The nilson is agone. The nilson is morose. If the nilson is idealistic then the nilson is allegiant. Big things are idealistic. The nilson is allegiant.", "logic": "\nIndrawn(nilson)\nAgone(nilson)\nMorose(nilson)\nIdealistic(nilson) -> Allegiant(nilson)\nforall x (Indrawn(x) -> Idealistic(x))\n\nAllegiant(nilson)\n\nIndrawn(nilson) and forall x (Indrawn(x) -> Idealistic(x)) -> therefore Idealistic(nilson) Idealistic(nilson) and Idealistic(nilson) -> Allegiant(nilson) -> therefore Allegiant(nilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "The atlanta is unifacial. The atlanta is midland. The atlanta is homonymic. If the atlanta is prosperous then the atlanta is incautious. Big things are prosperous. The atlanta is not incautious.", "logic": "\nUnifacial(atlanta)\nMidland(atlanta)\nHomonymic(atlanta)\nProsperous(atlanta) -> Incautious(atlanta)\nforall x (Unifacial(x) -> Prosperous(x))\n\nnot Incautious(atlanta)\n\nUnifacial(atlanta) and forall x (Unifacial(x) -> Prosperous(x)) -> therefore Prosperous(atlanta) Prosperous(atlanta) and Prosperous(atlanta) -> Incautious(atlanta) -> therefore Incautious(atlanta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "The alta is undeniable. The alta is shingly. The alta is alkahestic. If the alta is anti then the alta is swank. Big things are anti. The alta does not need the alta.", "logic": "\nUndeniable(alta)\nShingly(alta)\nAlkahestic(alta)\nAnti(alta) -> Swank(alta)\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Anti(x))\n\nnot Needs(alta, alta)\n\nnot Needs(alta, alta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "The jay is roasted. The jay is outgoing. The jay is powdery. If the jay is unsilenced then the jay is wounded. Big things are unsilenced. The jay sees the jay.", "logic": "\nRoasted(jay)\nOutgoing(jay)\nPowdery(jay)\nUnsilenced(jay) -> Wounded(jay)\nforall x (Roasted(x) -> Unsilenced(x))\n\nSees(jay, jay)\n\nSees(jay, jay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-748"} {"premises": "Viviana is nervous. Shelli is obstinate. Magna is nervous. Orin is bumbling. Young, nervous things are ranked. If something is bumbling and not closing then it is ranked. If something is obstinate and not pharaonic then it is not bumbling. Cold, closing things are bumbling. If something is obstinate then it is nervous. If Viviana is not closing and Viviana is not bumbling then Viviana is not ranked. Viviana is nervous.", "logic": "\nNervous(viviana)\nObstinate(shelli)\nNervous(magna)\nBumbling(orin)\nforall x (Obstinate(x) and Nervous(x) -> Ranked(x))\nforall x (Bumbling(x) and not Closing(x) -> Ranked(x))\nforall x (Obstinate(x) and not Pharaonic(x) -> not Bumbling(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and Closing(x) -> Bumbling(x))\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> Nervous(x))\nnot Closing(viviana) and not Bumbling(viviana) -> not Ranked(viviana)\n\nNervous(viviana)\n\ntherefore Nervous(viviana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Ainslee is clamant. Laurance is unvoiced. Amalia is clamant. Glenna is allowable. Young, clamant things are manichean. If something is allowable and not threatened then it is manichean. If something is unvoiced and not haywire then it is not allowable. Cold, threatened things are allowable. If something is unvoiced then it is clamant. If Ainslee is not threatened and Ainslee is not allowable then Ainslee is not manichean. Amalia is not clamant.", "logic": "\nClamant(ainslee)\nUnvoiced(laurance)\nClamant(amalia)\nAllowable(glenna)\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) and Clamant(x) -> Manichean(x))\nforall x (Allowable(x) and not Threatened(x) -> Manichean(x))\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) and not Haywire(x) -> not Allowable(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Threatened(x) -> Allowable(x))\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) -> Clamant(x))\nnot Threatened(ainslee) and not Allowable(ainslee) -> not Manichean(ainslee)\n\nnot Clamant(amalia)\n\ntherefore Clamant(amalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Zackariah is naval. Rustie is guardant. Randall is naval. Tobie is collagenic. Young, naval things are oblivious. If something is collagenic and not spongelike then it is oblivious. If something is guardant and not horrified then it is not collagenic. Cold, spongelike things are collagenic. If something is guardant then it is naval. If Zackariah is not spongelike and Zackariah is not collagenic then Zackariah is not oblivious. Rustie is naval.", "logic": "\nNaval(zackariah)\nGuardant(rustie)\nNaval(randall)\nCollagenic(tobie)\nforall x (Guardant(x) and Naval(x) -> Oblivious(x))\nforall x (Collagenic(x) and not Spongelike(x) -> Oblivious(x))\nforall x (Guardant(x) and not Horrified(x) -> not Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Naval(x))\nnot Spongelike(zackariah) and not Collagenic(zackariah) -> not Oblivious(zackariah)\n\nNaval(rustie)\n\nGuardant(rustie) and forall x (Guardant(x) -> Naval(x)) -> therefore Naval(rustie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Ulysses is uncurled. Oriana is western. Oralie is uncurled. Briana is delusory. Young, uncurled things are boric. If something is delusory and not ancestral then it is boric. If something is western and not dislocated then it is not delusory. Cold, ancestral things are delusory. If something is western then it is uncurled. If Ulysses is not ancestral and Ulysses is not delusory then Ulysses is not boric. Oriana is not uncurled.", "logic": "\nUncurled(ulysses)\nWestern(oriana)\nUncurled(oralie)\nDelusory(briana)\nforall x (Western(x) and Uncurled(x) -> Boric(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) and not Ancestral(x) -> Boric(x))\nforall x (Western(x) and not Dislocated(x) -> not Delusory(x))\nforall x (Dislocated(x) and Ancestral(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Western(x) -> Uncurled(x))\nnot Ancestral(ulysses) and not Delusory(ulysses) -> not Boric(ulysses)\n\nnot Uncurled(oriana)\n\nWestern(oriana) and forall x (Western(x) -> Uncurled(x)) -> therefore Uncurled(oriana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Joanna is lxii. Tisha is driving. Rosanne is lxii. Emmit is disused. Young, lxii things are lobate. If something is disused and not unruffled then it is lobate. If something is driving and not herculean then it is not disused. Cold, unruffled things are disused. If something is driving then it is lxii. If Joanna is not unruffled and Joanna is not disused then Joanna is not lobate. Tisha is lobate.", "logic": "\nLxii(joanna)\nDriving(tisha)\nLxii(rosanne)\nDisused(emmit)\nforall x (Driving(x) and Lxii(x) -> Lobate(x))\nforall x (Disused(x) and not Unruffled(x) -> Lobate(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) and not Herculean(x) -> not Disused(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) and Unruffled(x) -> Disused(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) -> Lxii(x))\nnot Unruffled(joanna) and not Disused(joanna) -> not Lobate(joanna)\n\nLobate(tisha)\n\nDriving(tisha) and forall x (Driving(x) -> Lxii(x)) -> therefore Lxii(tisha) Driving(tisha) and Lxii(tisha) and forall x (Driving(x) and Lxii(x) -> Lobate(x)) -> therefore Lobate(tisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Ronny is gangrenous. Leonard is valuable. Webb is gangrenous. Agneta is screaming. Young, gangrenous things are bowfront. If something is screaming and not analogue then it is bowfront. If something is valuable and not tartarean then it is not screaming. Cold, analogue things are screaming. If something is valuable then it is gangrenous. If Ronny is not analogue and Ronny is not screaming then Ronny is not bowfront. Leonard is not bowfront.", "logic": "\nGangrenous(ronny)\nValuable(leonard)\nGangrenous(webb)\nScreaming(agneta)\nforall x (Valuable(x) and Gangrenous(x) -> Bowfront(x))\nforall x (Screaming(x) and not Analogue(x) -> Bowfront(x))\nforall x (Valuable(x) and not Tartarean(x) -> not Screaming(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) and Analogue(x) -> Screaming(x))\nforall x (Valuable(x) -> Gangrenous(x))\nnot Analogue(ronny) and not Screaming(ronny) -> not Bowfront(ronny)\n\nnot Bowfront(leonard)\n\nValuable(leonard) and forall x (Valuable(x) -> Gangrenous(x)) -> therefore Gangrenous(leonard) Valuable(leonard) and Gangrenous(leonard) and forall x (Valuable(x) and Gangrenous(x) -> Bowfront(x)) -> therefore Bowfront(leonard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Kally is fifteen. Ruthe is nonelected. Gideon is fifteen. Clotilda is lymphoid. Young, fifteen things are edited. If something is lymphoid and not experient then it is edited. If something is nonelected and not invariant then it is not lymphoid. Cold, experient things are lymphoid. If something is nonelected then it is fifteen. If Kally is not experient and Kally is not lymphoid then Kally is not edited. Clotilda is not edited.", "logic": "\nFifteen(kally)\nNonelected(ruthe)\nFifteen(gideon)\nLymphoid(clotilda)\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and Fifteen(x) -> Edited(x))\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) and not Experient(x) -> Edited(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and not Invariant(x) -> not Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Invariant(x) and Experient(x) -> Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) -> Fifteen(x))\nnot Experient(kally) and not Lymphoid(kally) -> not Edited(kally)\n\nnot Edited(clotilda)\n\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and Fifteen(x) -> Edited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Zorine is infrared. Darline is barbarous. Shirleen is infrared. Fletcher is warming. Young, infrared things are subaqueous. If something is warming and not sibylline then it is subaqueous. If something is barbarous and not dissected then it is not warming. Cold, sibylline things are warming. If something is barbarous then it is infrared. If Zorine is not sibylline and Zorine is not warming then Zorine is not subaqueous. Shirleen is warming.", "logic": "\nInfrared(zorine)\nBarbarous(darline)\nInfrared(shirleen)\nWarming(fletcher)\nforall x (Barbarous(x) and Infrared(x) -> Subaqueous(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) and not Sibylline(x) -> Subaqueous(x))\nforall x (Barbarous(x) and not Dissected(x) -> not Warming(x))\nforall x (Dissected(x) and Sibylline(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Barbarous(x) -> Infrared(x))\nnot Sibylline(zorine) and not Warming(zorine) -> not Subaqueous(zorine)\n\nWarming(shirleen)\n\nforall x (Dissected(x) and Sibylline(x) -> Warming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Brianna is unpainful. Traci is ruinous. Alana is unpainful. Nerte is nerveless. Young, unpainful things are dated. If something is nerveless and not over then it is dated. If something is ruinous and not adjective then it is not nerveless. Cold, over things are nerveless. If something is ruinous then it is unpainful. If Brianna is not over and Brianna is not nerveless then Brianna is not dated. Brianna is not dated.", "logic": "\nUnpainful(brianna)\nRuinous(traci)\nUnpainful(alana)\nNerveless(nerte)\nforall x (Ruinous(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Dated(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and not Over(x) -> Dated(x))\nforall x (Ruinous(x) and not Adjective(x) -> not Nerveless(x))\nforall x (Adjective(x) and Over(x) -> Nerveless(x))\nforall x (Ruinous(x) -> Unpainful(x))\nnot Over(brianna) and not Nerveless(brianna) -> not Dated(brianna)\n\nnot Dated(brianna)\n\nforall x (Ruinous(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Dated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Heinz is sparkling. Maxwell is perinasal. Avie is sparkling. Freida is disloyal. Young, sparkling things are crowded. If something is disloyal and not pinnate then it is crowded. If something is perinasal and not abyssal then it is not disloyal. Cold, pinnate things are disloyal. If something is perinasal then it is sparkling. If Heinz is not pinnate and Heinz is not disloyal then Heinz is not crowded. Avie is blue.", "logic": "\nSparkling(heinz)\nPerinasal(maxwell)\nSparkling(avie)\nDisloyal(freida)\nforall x (Perinasal(x) and Sparkling(x) -> Crowded(x))\nforall x (Disloyal(x) and not Pinnate(x) -> Crowded(x))\nforall x (Perinasal(x) and not Abyssal(x) -> not Disloyal(x))\nforall x (Abyssal(x) and Pinnate(x) -> Disloyal(x))\nforall x (Perinasal(x) -> Sparkling(x))\nnot Pinnate(heinz) and not Disloyal(heinz) -> not Crowded(heinz)\n\nBlue(avie)\n\nBlue(avie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "French is unbending. Ericka is partisan. Stephie is unbending. Langston is thickset. Young, unbending things are english. If something is thickset and not archaistic then it is english. If something is partisan and not trilingual then it is not thickset. Cold, archaistic things are thickset. If something is partisan then it is unbending. If French is not archaistic and French is not thickset then French is not english. Stephie is not archaistic.", "logic": "\nUnbending(french)\nPartisan(ericka)\nUnbending(stephie)\nThickset(langston)\nforall x (Partisan(x) and Unbending(x) -> English(x))\nforall x (Thickset(x) and not Archaistic(x) -> English(x))\nforall x (Partisan(x) and not Trilingual(x) -> not Thickset(x))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Thickset(x))\nforall x (Partisan(x) -> Unbending(x))\nnot Archaistic(french) and not Thickset(french) -> not English(french)\n\nnot Archaistic(stephie)\n\nnot Archaistic(stephie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Conway is faustian. Kerri is wearable. Alene is faustian. Erinna is cupulate. Young, faustian things are biconcave. If something is cupulate and not hearsay then it is biconcave. If something is wearable and not daedal then it is not cupulate. Cold, hearsay things are cupulate. If something is wearable then it is faustian. If Conway is not hearsay and Conway is not cupulate then Conway is not biconcave. Alene is wearable.", "logic": "\nFaustian(conway)\nWearable(kerri)\nFaustian(alene)\nCupulate(erinna)\nforall x (Wearable(x) and Faustian(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nforall x (Cupulate(x) and not Hearsay(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nforall x (Wearable(x) and not Daedal(x) -> not Cupulate(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) and Hearsay(x) -> Cupulate(x))\nforall x (Wearable(x) -> Faustian(x))\nnot Hearsay(conway) and not Cupulate(conway) -> not Biconcave(conway)\n\nWearable(alene)\n\nWearable(alene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1662"} {"premises": "Myrta is cyclopean. Myrta is hurtful. Myrta is iridescent. Myrta is melodious. Myrta is dissonant. Verena is cyclopean. Verena is mouldy. Verena is hurtful. Verena is reticular. Verena is iridescent. Verena is melodious. Verena is dissonant. Quiet, melodious things are mouldy. If Myrta is dissonant and Myrta is iridescent then Myrta is reticular. Verena is hurtful.", "logic": "\nCyclopean(myrta)\nHurtful(myrta)\nIridescent(myrta)\nMelodious(myrta)\nDissonant(myrta)\nCyclopean(verena)\nMouldy(verena)\nHurtful(verena)\nReticular(verena)\nIridescent(verena)\nMelodious(verena)\nDissonant(verena)\nforall x (Reticular(x) and Melodious(x) -> Mouldy(x))\nDissonant(myrta) and Iridescent(myrta) -> Reticular(myrta)\n\nHurtful(verena)\n\ntherefore Hurtful(verena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "Gerhardt is antsy. Gerhardt is saucy. Gerhardt is branchial. Gerhardt is noisy. Gerhardt is textbook. Morlee is antsy. Morlee is drear. Morlee is saucy. Morlee is coloured. Morlee is branchial. Morlee is noisy. Morlee is textbook. Quiet, noisy things are drear. If Gerhardt is textbook and Gerhardt is branchial then Gerhardt is coloured. Morlee is not drear.", "logic": "\nAntsy(gerhardt)\nSaucy(gerhardt)\nBranchial(gerhardt)\nNoisy(gerhardt)\nTextbook(gerhardt)\nAntsy(morlee)\nDrear(morlee)\nSaucy(morlee)\nColoured(morlee)\nBranchial(morlee)\nNoisy(morlee)\nTextbook(morlee)\nforall x (Coloured(x) and Noisy(x) -> Drear(x))\nTextbook(gerhardt) and Branchial(gerhardt) -> Coloured(gerhardt)\n\nnot Drear(morlee)\n\ntherefore Drear(morlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "Millicent is inclement. Millicent is chartless. Millicent is ambiguous. Millicent is biramous. Millicent is arcuate. Dorelia is inclement. Dorelia is dissolved. Dorelia is chartless. Dorelia is obliged. Dorelia is ambiguous. Dorelia is biramous. Dorelia is arcuate. Quiet, biramous things are dissolved. If Millicent is arcuate and Millicent is ambiguous then Millicent is obliged. Millicent is obliged.", "logic": "\nInclement(millicent)\nChartless(millicent)\nAmbiguous(millicent)\nBiramous(millicent)\nArcuate(millicent)\nInclement(dorelia)\nDissolved(dorelia)\nChartless(dorelia)\nObliged(dorelia)\nAmbiguous(dorelia)\nBiramous(dorelia)\nArcuate(dorelia)\nforall x (Obliged(x) and Biramous(x) -> Dissolved(x))\nArcuate(millicent) and Ambiguous(millicent) -> Obliged(millicent)\n\nObliged(millicent)\n\nArcuate(millicent) and Ambiguous(millicent) and Arcuate(millicent) and Ambiguous(millicent) -> Obliged(millicent) -> therefore Obliged(millicent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "Kelley is solo. Kelley is unholy. Kelley is derisive. Kelley is teasing. Kelley is dull. Silvie is solo. Silvie is peninsular. Silvie is unholy. Silvie is organized. Silvie is derisive. Silvie is teasing. Silvie is dull. Quiet, teasing things are peninsular. If Kelley is dull and Kelley is derisive then Kelley is organized. Kelley is not organized.", "logic": "\nSolo(kelley)\nUnholy(kelley)\nDerisive(kelley)\nTeasing(kelley)\nDull(kelley)\nSolo(silvie)\nPeninsular(silvie)\nUnholy(silvie)\nOrganized(silvie)\nDerisive(silvie)\nTeasing(silvie)\nDull(silvie)\nforall x (Organized(x) and Teasing(x) -> Peninsular(x))\nDull(kelley) and Derisive(kelley) -> Organized(kelley)\n\nnot Organized(kelley)\n\nDull(kelley) and Derisive(kelley) and Dull(kelley) and Derisive(kelley) -> Organized(kelley) -> therefore Organized(kelley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "Trudi is exultant. Trudi is bald. Trudi is aphyllous. Trudi is runny. Trudi is conserved. Pieter is exultant. Pieter is glutted. Pieter is bald. Pieter is passerine. Pieter is aphyllous. Pieter is runny. Pieter is conserved. Quiet, runny things are glutted. If Trudi is conserved and Trudi is aphyllous then Trudi is passerine. Trudi is glutted.", "logic": "\nExultant(trudi)\nBald(trudi)\nAphyllous(trudi)\nRunny(trudi)\nConserved(trudi)\nExultant(pieter)\nGlutted(pieter)\nBald(pieter)\nPasserine(pieter)\nAphyllous(pieter)\nRunny(pieter)\nConserved(pieter)\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Runny(x) -> Glutted(x))\nConserved(trudi) and Aphyllous(trudi) -> Passerine(trudi)\n\nGlutted(trudi)\n\nConserved(trudi) and Aphyllous(trudi) and Conserved(trudi) and Aphyllous(trudi) -> Passerine(trudi) -> therefore Passerine(trudi) Passerine(trudi) and Runny(trudi) and forall x (Passerine(x) and Runny(x) -> Glutted(x)) -> therefore Glutted(trudi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "Jessi is rabbinic. Jessi is scrimpy. Jessi is ravening. Jessi is intimal. Jessi is terrific. Pierrette is rabbinic. Pierrette is eightpenny. Pierrette is scrimpy. Pierrette is structural. Pierrette is ravening. Pierrette is intimal. Pierrette is terrific. Quiet, intimal things are eightpenny. If Jessi is terrific and Jessi is ravening then Jessi is structural. Jessi is not eightpenny.", "logic": "\nRabbinic(jessi)\nScrimpy(jessi)\nRavening(jessi)\nIntimal(jessi)\nTerrific(jessi)\nRabbinic(pierrette)\nEightpenny(pierrette)\nScrimpy(pierrette)\nStructural(pierrette)\nRavening(pierrette)\nIntimal(pierrette)\nTerrific(pierrette)\nforall x (Structural(x) and Intimal(x) -> Eightpenny(x))\nTerrific(jessi) and Ravening(jessi) -> Structural(jessi)\n\nnot Eightpenny(jessi)\n\nTerrific(jessi) and Ravening(jessi) and Terrific(jessi) and Ravening(jessi) -> Structural(jessi) -> therefore Structural(jessi) Structural(jessi) and Intimal(jessi) and forall x (Structural(x) and Intimal(x) -> Eightpenny(x)) -> therefore Eightpenny(jessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-788"} {"premises": "The olia sled the raine. The olia sled the jesse. The raine tattle the jesse. The raine is anguine. The raine sled the jesse. The raine swag the olia. The raine swag the jesse. The jesse tattle the raine. The jesse sled the olia. The jesse swag the olia. If someone tattle the jesse and the jesse does not see the olia then the jesse is fahrenheit. If the jesse swag the olia and the olia sled the jesse then the jesse is fahrenheit. If someone tattle the raine then they do not like the raine. If someone is concordant and they eat the raine then they are fahrenheit. If the olia tattle the jesse and the raine does not see the olia then the jesse tattle the olia. If someone is fahrenheit then they see the raine. The raine swag the jesse.", "logic": "\nSled(olia, raine)\nSled(olia, jesse)\nTattle(raine, jesse)\nAnguine(raine)\nSled(raine, jesse)\nSwag(raine, olia)\nSwag(raine, jesse)\nTattle(jesse, raine)\nSled(jesse, olia)\nSwag(jesse, olia)\nforall x (Tattle(x, jesse) and not Swag(jesse, olia) -> Fahrenheit(jesse))\nSwag(jesse, olia) and Sled(olia, jesse) -> Fahrenheit(jesse)\nforall x (Tattle(x, raine) -> not Sled(x, raine))\nforall x (Concordant(x) and Tattle(x, raine) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nTattle(olia, jesse) and not Swag(raine, olia) -> Tattle(jesse, olia)\nforall x (Fahrenheit(x) -> Swag(x, raine))\n\nSwag(raine, jesse)\n\ntherefore Swag(raine, jesse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The augustine convoy the corbin. The augustine convoy the lucky. The corbin personify the lucky. The corbin is positive. The corbin convoy the lucky. The corbin vulgarize the augustine. The corbin vulgarize the lucky. The lucky personify the corbin. The lucky convoy the augustine. The lucky vulgarize the augustine. If someone personify the lucky and the lucky does not see the augustine then the lucky is tripinnate. If the lucky vulgarize the augustine and the augustine convoy the lucky then the lucky is tripinnate. If someone personify the corbin then they do not like the corbin. If someone is safe and they eat the corbin then they are tripinnate. If the augustine personify the lucky and the corbin does not see the augustine then the lucky personify the augustine. If someone is tripinnate then they see the corbin. The augustine does not like the corbin.", "logic": "\nConvoy(augustine, corbin)\nConvoy(augustine, lucky)\nPersonify(corbin, lucky)\nPositive(corbin)\nConvoy(corbin, lucky)\nVulgarize(corbin, augustine)\nVulgarize(corbin, lucky)\nPersonify(lucky, corbin)\nConvoy(lucky, augustine)\nVulgarize(lucky, augustine)\nforall x (Personify(x, lucky) and not Vulgarize(lucky, augustine) -> Tripinnate(lucky))\nVulgarize(lucky, augustine) and Convoy(augustine, lucky) -> Tripinnate(lucky)\nforall x (Personify(x, corbin) -> not Convoy(x, corbin))\nforall x (Safe(x) and Personify(x, corbin) -> Tripinnate(x))\nPersonify(augustine, lucky) and not Vulgarize(corbin, augustine) -> Personify(lucky, augustine)\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) -> Vulgarize(x, corbin))\n\nnot Convoy(augustine, corbin)\n\ntherefore Convoy(augustine, corbin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The beaufort assort the lorianne. The beaufort assort the malissia. The lorianne palatalize the malissia. The lorianne is classless. The lorianne assort the malissia. The lorianne storm the beaufort. The lorianne storm the malissia. The malissia palatalize the lorianne. The malissia assort the beaufort. The malissia storm the beaufort. If someone palatalize the malissia and the malissia does not see the beaufort then the malissia is teutonic. If the malissia storm the beaufort and the beaufort assort the malissia then the malissia is teutonic. If someone palatalize the lorianne then they do not like the lorianne. If someone is skyward and they eat the lorianne then they are teutonic. If the beaufort palatalize the malissia and the lorianne does not see the beaufort then the malissia palatalize the beaufort. If someone is teutonic then they see the lorianne. The malissia does not like the lorianne.", "logic": "\nAssort(beaufort, lorianne)\nAssort(beaufort, malissia)\nPalatalize(lorianne, malissia)\nClassless(lorianne)\nAssort(lorianne, malissia)\nStorm(lorianne, beaufort)\nStorm(lorianne, malissia)\nPalatalize(malissia, lorianne)\nAssort(malissia, beaufort)\nStorm(malissia, beaufort)\nforall x (Palatalize(x, malissia) and not Storm(malissia, beaufort) -> Teutonic(malissia))\nStorm(malissia, beaufort) and Assort(beaufort, malissia) -> Teutonic(malissia)\nforall x (Palatalize(x, lorianne) -> not Assort(x, lorianne))\nforall x (Skyward(x) and Palatalize(x, lorianne) -> Teutonic(x))\nPalatalize(beaufort, malissia) and not Storm(lorianne, beaufort) -> Palatalize(malissia, beaufort)\nforall x (Teutonic(x) -> Storm(x, lorianne))\n\nnot Assort(malissia, lorianne)\n\nPalatalize(malissia, lorianne) and forall x (Palatalize(x, lorianne) -> not Assort(x, lorianne)) -> therefore not Assort(malissia, lorianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The rubia trespass the helga. The rubia trespass the redmond. The helga extrude the redmond. The helga is acapnic. The helga trespass the redmond. The helga impanel the rubia. The helga impanel the redmond. The redmond extrude the helga. The redmond trespass the rubia. The redmond impanel the rubia. If someone extrude the redmond and the redmond does not see the rubia then the redmond is unopen. If the redmond impanel the rubia and the rubia trespass the redmond then the redmond is unopen. If someone extrude the helga then they do not like the helga. If someone is mantled and they eat the helga then they are unopen. If the rubia extrude the redmond and the helga does not see the rubia then the redmond extrude the rubia. If someone is unopen then they see the helga. The redmond trespass the helga.", "logic": "\nTrespass(rubia, helga)\nTrespass(rubia, redmond)\nExtrude(helga, redmond)\nAcapnic(helga)\nTrespass(helga, redmond)\nImpanel(helga, rubia)\nImpanel(helga, redmond)\nExtrude(redmond, helga)\nTrespass(redmond, rubia)\nImpanel(redmond, rubia)\nforall x (Extrude(x, redmond) and not Impanel(redmond, rubia) -> Unopen(redmond))\nImpanel(redmond, rubia) and Trespass(rubia, redmond) -> Unopen(redmond)\nforall x (Extrude(x, helga) -> not Trespass(x, helga))\nforall x (Mantled(x) and Extrude(x, helga) -> Unopen(x))\nExtrude(rubia, redmond) and not Impanel(helga, rubia) -> Extrude(redmond, rubia)\nforall x (Unopen(x) -> Impanel(x, helga))\n\nTrespass(redmond, helga)\n\nExtrude(redmond, helga) and forall x (Extrude(x, helga) -> not Trespass(x, helga)) -> therefore not Trespass(redmond, helga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The lilla predecease the korry. The lilla predecease the ilsa. The korry plight the ilsa. The korry is unaided. The korry predecease the ilsa. The korry divert the lilla. The korry divert the ilsa. The ilsa plight the korry. The ilsa predecease the lilla. The ilsa divert the lilla. If someone plight the ilsa and the ilsa does not see the lilla then the ilsa is heavyset. If the ilsa divert the lilla and the lilla predecease the ilsa then the ilsa is heavyset. If someone plight the korry then they do not like the korry. If someone is candescent and they eat the korry then they are heavyset. If the lilla plight the ilsa and the korry does not see the lilla then the ilsa plight the lilla. If someone is heavyset then they see the korry. The ilsa divert the korry.", "logic": "\nPredecease(lilla, korry)\nPredecease(lilla, ilsa)\nPlight(korry, ilsa)\nUnaided(korry)\nPredecease(korry, ilsa)\nDivert(korry, lilla)\nDivert(korry, ilsa)\nPlight(ilsa, korry)\nPredecease(ilsa, lilla)\nDivert(ilsa, lilla)\nforall x (Plight(x, ilsa) and not Divert(ilsa, lilla) -> Heavyset(ilsa))\nDivert(ilsa, lilla) and Predecease(lilla, ilsa) -> Heavyset(ilsa)\nforall x (Plight(x, korry) -> not Predecease(x, korry))\nforall x (Candescent(x) and Plight(x, korry) -> Heavyset(x))\nPlight(lilla, ilsa) and not Divert(korry, lilla) -> Plight(ilsa, lilla)\nforall x (Heavyset(x) -> Divert(x, korry))\n\nDivert(ilsa, korry)\n\nDivert(ilsa, lilla) and Predecease(lilla, ilsa) and Divert(ilsa, lilla) and Predecease(lilla, ilsa) -> Heavyset(ilsa) -> therefore Heavyset(ilsa) Heavyset(ilsa) and forall x (Heavyset(x) -> Divert(x, korry)) -> therefore Divert(ilsa, korry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The jeana green the gunner. The jeana green the gillian. The gunner retreat the gillian. The gunner is sorrel. The gunner green the gillian. The gunner disperse the jeana. The gunner disperse the gillian. The gillian retreat the gunner. The gillian green the jeana. The gillian disperse the jeana. If someone retreat the gillian and the gillian does not see the jeana then the gillian is eponymous. If the gillian disperse the jeana and the jeana green the gillian then the gillian is eponymous. If someone retreat the gunner then they do not like the gunner. If someone is intent and they eat the gunner then they are eponymous. If the jeana retreat the gillian and the gunner does not see the jeana then the gillian retreat the jeana. If someone is eponymous then they see the gunner. The gillian does not see the gunner.", "logic": "\nGreen(jeana, gunner)\nGreen(jeana, gillian)\nRetreat(gunner, gillian)\nSorrel(gunner)\nGreen(gunner, gillian)\nDisperse(gunner, jeana)\nDisperse(gunner, gillian)\nRetreat(gillian, gunner)\nGreen(gillian, jeana)\nDisperse(gillian, jeana)\nforall x (Retreat(x, gillian) and not Disperse(gillian, jeana) -> Eponymous(gillian))\nDisperse(gillian, jeana) and Green(jeana, gillian) -> Eponymous(gillian)\nforall x (Retreat(x, gunner) -> not Green(x, gunner))\nforall x (Intent(x) and Retreat(x, gunner) -> Eponymous(x))\nRetreat(jeana, gillian) and not Disperse(gunner, jeana) -> Retreat(gillian, jeana)\nforall x (Eponymous(x) -> Disperse(x, gunner))\n\nnot Disperse(gillian, gunner)\n\nDisperse(gillian, jeana) and Green(jeana, gillian) and Disperse(gillian, jeana) and Green(jeana, gillian) -> Eponymous(gillian) -> therefore Eponymous(gillian) Eponymous(gillian) and forall x (Eponymous(x) -> Disperse(x, gunner)) -> therefore Disperse(gillian, gunner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The kaila lateralize the marion. The kaila lateralize the ailee. The marion stampede the ailee. The marion is patellar. The marion lateralize the ailee. The marion fireproof the kaila. The marion fireproof the ailee. The ailee stampede the marion. The ailee lateralize the kaila. The ailee fireproof the kaila. If someone stampede the ailee and the ailee does not see the kaila then the ailee is caring. If the ailee fireproof the kaila and the kaila lateralize the ailee then the ailee is caring. If someone stampede the marion then they do not like the marion. If someone is outmoded and they eat the marion then they are caring. If the kaila stampede the ailee and the marion does not see the kaila then the ailee stampede the kaila. If someone is caring then they see the marion. The kaila does not see the marion.", "logic": "\nLateralize(kaila, marion)\nLateralize(kaila, ailee)\nStampede(marion, ailee)\nPatellar(marion)\nLateralize(marion, ailee)\nFireproof(marion, kaila)\nFireproof(marion, ailee)\nStampede(ailee, marion)\nLateralize(ailee, kaila)\nFireproof(ailee, kaila)\nforall x (Stampede(x, ailee) and not Fireproof(ailee, kaila) -> Caring(ailee))\nFireproof(ailee, kaila) and Lateralize(kaila, ailee) -> Caring(ailee)\nforall x (Stampede(x, marion) -> not Lateralize(x, marion))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) and Stampede(x, marion) -> Caring(x))\nStampede(kaila, ailee) and not Fireproof(marion, kaila) -> Stampede(ailee, kaila)\nforall x (Caring(x) -> Fireproof(x, marion))\n\nnot Fireproof(kaila, marion)\n\nforall x (Caring(x) -> Fireproof(x, marion)) <- forall x (Outmoded(x) and Stampede(x, marion) -> Caring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The hoyt persevere the hakeem. The hoyt persevere the kelly. The hakeem mislead the kelly. The hakeem is insistent. The hakeem persevere the kelly. The hakeem encrypt the hoyt. The hakeem encrypt the kelly. The kelly mislead the hakeem. The kelly persevere the hoyt. The kelly encrypt the hoyt. If someone mislead the kelly and the kelly does not see the hoyt then the kelly is staged. If the kelly encrypt the hoyt and the hoyt persevere the kelly then the kelly is staged. If someone mislead the hakeem then they do not like the hakeem. If someone is retracted and they eat the hakeem then they are staged. If the hoyt mislead the kelly and the hakeem does not see the hoyt then the kelly mislead the hoyt. If someone is staged then they see the hakeem. The kelly mislead the hoyt.", "logic": "\nPersevere(hoyt, hakeem)\nPersevere(hoyt, kelly)\nMislead(hakeem, kelly)\nInsistent(hakeem)\nPersevere(hakeem, kelly)\nEncrypt(hakeem, hoyt)\nEncrypt(hakeem, kelly)\nMislead(kelly, hakeem)\nPersevere(kelly, hoyt)\nEncrypt(kelly, hoyt)\nforall x (Mislead(x, kelly) and not Encrypt(kelly, hoyt) -> Staged(kelly))\nEncrypt(kelly, hoyt) and Persevere(hoyt, kelly) -> Staged(kelly)\nforall x (Mislead(x, hakeem) -> not Persevere(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Retracted(x) and Mislead(x, hakeem) -> Staged(x))\nMislead(hoyt, kelly) and not Encrypt(hakeem, hoyt) -> Mislead(kelly, hoyt)\nforall x (Staged(x) -> Encrypt(x, hakeem))\n\nMislead(kelly, hoyt)\n\nMislead(hoyt, kelly) and not Encrypt(hakeem, hoyt) -> Mislead(kelly, hoyt) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The blancha tone the marshall. The blancha tone the loralie. The marshall harmonise the loralie. The marshall is amerindic. The marshall tone the loralie. The marshall shuck the blancha. The marshall shuck the loralie. The loralie harmonise the marshall. The loralie tone the blancha. The loralie shuck the blancha. If someone harmonise the loralie and the loralie does not see the blancha then the loralie is formalised. If the loralie shuck the blancha and the blancha tone the loralie then the loralie is formalised. If someone harmonise the marshall then they do not like the marshall. If someone is woolen and they eat the marshall then they are formalised. If the blancha harmonise the loralie and the marshall does not see the blancha then the loralie harmonise the blancha. If someone is formalised then they see the marshall. The blancha is not formalised.", "logic": "\nTone(blancha, marshall)\nTone(blancha, loralie)\nHarmonise(marshall, loralie)\nAmerindic(marshall)\nTone(marshall, loralie)\nShuck(marshall, blancha)\nShuck(marshall, loralie)\nHarmonise(loralie, marshall)\nTone(loralie, blancha)\nShuck(loralie, blancha)\nforall x (Harmonise(x, loralie) and not Shuck(loralie, blancha) -> Formalised(loralie))\nShuck(loralie, blancha) and Tone(blancha, loralie) -> Formalised(loralie)\nforall x (Harmonise(x, marshall) -> not Tone(x, marshall))\nforall x (Woolen(x) and Harmonise(x, marshall) -> Formalised(x))\nHarmonise(blancha, loralie) and not Shuck(marshall, blancha) -> Harmonise(loralie, blancha)\nforall x (Formalised(x) -> Shuck(x, marshall))\n\nnot Formalised(blancha)\n\nforall x (Woolen(x) and Harmonise(x, marshall) -> Formalised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The moya wean the meghann. The moya wean the nisa. The meghann devil the nisa. The meghann is maoist. The meghann wean the nisa. The meghann convert the moya. The meghann convert the nisa. The nisa devil the meghann. The nisa wean the moya. The nisa convert the moya. If someone devil the nisa and the nisa does not see the moya then the nisa is incurvate. If the nisa convert the moya and the moya wean the nisa then the nisa is incurvate. If someone devil the meghann then they do not like the meghann. If someone is firm and they eat the meghann then they are incurvate. If the moya devil the nisa and the meghann does not see the moya then the nisa devil the moya. If someone is incurvate then they see the meghann. The meghann wean the meghann.", "logic": "\nWean(moya, meghann)\nWean(moya, nisa)\nDevil(meghann, nisa)\nMaoist(meghann)\nWean(meghann, nisa)\nConvert(meghann, moya)\nConvert(meghann, nisa)\nDevil(nisa, meghann)\nWean(nisa, moya)\nConvert(nisa, moya)\nforall x (Devil(x, nisa) and not Convert(nisa, moya) -> Incurvate(nisa))\nConvert(nisa, moya) and Wean(moya, nisa) -> Incurvate(nisa)\nforall x (Devil(x, meghann) -> not Wean(x, meghann))\nforall x (Firm(x) and Devil(x, meghann) -> Incurvate(x))\nDevil(moya, nisa) and not Convert(meghann, moya) -> Devil(nisa, moya)\nforall x (Incurvate(x) -> Convert(x, meghann))\n\nWean(meghann, meghann)\n\nWean(meghann, meghann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The shaylah deduct the eleonora. The shaylah deduct the doroteya. The eleonora tariff the doroteya. The eleonora is antiblack. The eleonora deduct the doroteya. The eleonora wage the shaylah. The eleonora wage the doroteya. The doroteya tariff the eleonora. The doroteya deduct the shaylah. The doroteya wage the shaylah. If someone tariff the doroteya and the doroteya does not see the shaylah then the doroteya is screwball. If the doroteya wage the shaylah and the shaylah deduct the doroteya then the doroteya is screwball. If someone tariff the eleonora then they do not like the eleonora. If someone is isotropic and they eat the eleonora then they are screwball. If the shaylah tariff the doroteya and the eleonora does not see the shaylah then the doroteya tariff the shaylah. If someone is screwball then they see the eleonora. The doroteya is not red.", "logic": "\nDeduct(shaylah, eleonora)\nDeduct(shaylah, doroteya)\nTariff(eleonora, doroteya)\nAntiblack(eleonora)\nDeduct(eleonora, doroteya)\nWage(eleonora, shaylah)\nWage(eleonora, doroteya)\nTariff(doroteya, eleonora)\nDeduct(doroteya, shaylah)\nWage(doroteya, shaylah)\nforall x (Tariff(x, doroteya) and not Wage(doroteya, shaylah) -> Screwball(doroteya))\nWage(doroteya, shaylah) and Deduct(shaylah, doroteya) -> Screwball(doroteya)\nforall x (Tariff(x, eleonora) -> not Deduct(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Tariff(x, eleonora) -> Screwball(x))\nTariff(shaylah, doroteya) and not Wage(eleonora, shaylah) -> Tariff(doroteya, shaylah)\nforall x (Screwball(x) -> Wage(x, eleonora))\n\nnot Red(doroteya)\n\nnot Red(doroteya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The luanna darken the barty. The luanna darken the barbee. The barty acquire the barbee. The barty is zonary. The barty darken the barbee. The barty head the luanna. The barty head the barbee. The barbee acquire the barty. The barbee darken the luanna. The barbee head the luanna. If someone acquire the barbee and the barbee does not see the luanna then the barbee is negligent. If the barbee head the luanna and the luanna darken the barbee then the barbee is negligent. If someone acquire the barty then they do not like the barty. If someone is xxxiv and they eat the barty then they are negligent. If the luanna acquire the barbee and the barty does not see the luanna then the barbee acquire the luanna. If someone is negligent then they see the barty. The barty is nice.", "logic": "\nDarken(luanna, barty)\nDarken(luanna, barbee)\nAcquire(barty, barbee)\nZonary(barty)\nDarken(barty, barbee)\nHead(barty, luanna)\nHead(barty, barbee)\nAcquire(barbee, barty)\nDarken(barbee, luanna)\nHead(barbee, luanna)\nforall x (Acquire(x, barbee) and not Head(barbee, luanna) -> Negligent(barbee))\nHead(barbee, luanna) and Darken(luanna, barbee) -> Negligent(barbee)\nforall x (Acquire(x, barty) -> not Darken(x, barty))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Acquire(x, barty) -> Negligent(x))\nAcquire(luanna, barbee) and not Head(barty, luanna) -> Acquire(barbee, luanna)\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Head(x, barty))\n\nNice(barty)\n\nNice(barty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-618"} {"premises": "The margie repent the melosa. The margie is not saccharine. The rhiamon repent the margie. The rhiamon is unforested. The rhiamon adapt the margie. The rhiamon adapt the melosa. The melosa fillet the rhiamon. The melosa is married. The melosa is not ursine. The melosa adapt the rhiamon. If something repent the melosa and the melosa is unforested then it does not eat the melosa. If the melosa adapt the rhiamon then the melosa is unforested. The melosa adapt the rhiamon.", "logic": "\nRepent(margie, melosa)\nnot Saccharine(margie)\nRepent(rhiamon, margie)\nUnforested(rhiamon)\nAdapt(rhiamon, margie)\nAdapt(rhiamon, melosa)\nFillet(melosa, rhiamon)\nMarried(melosa)\nnot Ursine(melosa)\nAdapt(melosa, rhiamon)\nforall x (Repent(x, melosa) and Unforested(melosa) -> not Fillet(x, melosa))\nAdapt(melosa, rhiamon) -> Unforested(melosa)\n\nAdapt(melosa, rhiamon)\n\ntherefore Adapt(melosa, rhiamon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The kore bastardize the cyb. The kore is not twoscore. The chane bastardize the kore. The chane is lusitanian. The chane batik the kore. The chane batik the cyb. The cyb arborise the chane. The cyb is gonadal. The cyb is not witchlike. The cyb batik the chane. If something bastardize the cyb and the cyb is lusitanian then it does not eat the cyb. If the cyb batik the chane then the cyb is lusitanian. The chane does not chase the kore.", "logic": "\nBastardize(kore, cyb)\nnot Twoscore(kore)\nBastardize(chane, kore)\nLusitanian(chane)\nBatik(chane, kore)\nBatik(chane, cyb)\nArborise(cyb, chane)\nGonadal(cyb)\nnot Witchlike(cyb)\nBatik(cyb, chane)\nforall x (Bastardize(x, cyb) and Lusitanian(cyb) -> not Arborise(x, cyb))\nBatik(cyb, chane) -> Lusitanian(cyb)\n\nnot Bastardize(chane, kore)\n\ntherefore Bastardize(chane, kore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The odella campaign the rhianon. The odella is not gaga. The randolph campaign the odella. The randolph is intolerant. The randolph pause the odella. The randolph pause the rhianon. The rhianon fleet the randolph. The rhianon is trillionth. The rhianon is not invading. The rhianon pause the randolph. If something campaign the rhianon and the rhianon is intolerant then it does not eat the rhianon. If the rhianon pause the randolph then the rhianon is intolerant. The rhianon is intolerant.", "logic": "\nCampaign(odella, rhianon)\nnot Gaga(odella)\nCampaign(randolph, odella)\nIntolerant(randolph)\nPause(randolph, odella)\nPause(randolph, rhianon)\nFleet(rhianon, randolph)\nTrillionth(rhianon)\nnot Invading(rhianon)\nPause(rhianon, randolph)\nforall x (Campaign(x, rhianon) and Intolerant(rhianon) -> not Fleet(x, rhianon))\nPause(rhianon, randolph) -> Intolerant(rhianon)\n\nIntolerant(rhianon)\n\nPause(rhianon, randolph) and Pause(rhianon, randolph) -> Intolerant(rhianon) -> therefore Intolerant(rhianon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The elbertina pool the libby. The elbertina is not cairned. The cabrina pool the elbertina. The cabrina is whiskery. The cabrina riffle the elbertina. The cabrina riffle the libby. The libby guillotine the cabrina. The libby is afire. The libby is not omniscient. The libby riffle the cabrina. If something pool the libby and the libby is whiskery then it does not eat the libby. If the libby riffle the cabrina then the libby is whiskery. The libby is not whiskery.", "logic": "\nPool(elbertina, libby)\nnot Cairned(elbertina)\nPool(cabrina, elbertina)\nWhiskery(cabrina)\nRiffle(cabrina, elbertina)\nRiffle(cabrina, libby)\nGuillotine(libby, cabrina)\nAfire(libby)\nnot Omniscient(libby)\nRiffle(libby, cabrina)\nforall x (Pool(x, libby) and Whiskery(libby) -> not Guillotine(x, libby))\nRiffle(libby, cabrina) -> Whiskery(libby)\n\nnot Whiskery(libby)\n\nRiffle(libby, cabrina) and Riffle(libby, cabrina) -> Whiskery(libby) -> therefore Whiskery(libby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The kelley uncouple the ardis. The kelley is not adamant. The tannie uncouple the kelley. The tannie is reptilian. The tannie emulate the kelley. The tannie emulate the ardis. The ardis ingeminate the tannie. The ardis is dubitable. The ardis is not contralto. The ardis emulate the tannie. If something uncouple the ardis and the ardis is reptilian then it does not eat the ardis. If the ardis emulate the tannie then the ardis is reptilian. The kelley does not eat the ardis.", "logic": "\nUncouple(kelley, ardis)\nnot Adamant(kelley)\nUncouple(tannie, kelley)\nReptilian(tannie)\nEmulate(tannie, kelley)\nEmulate(tannie, ardis)\nIngeminate(ardis, tannie)\nDubitable(ardis)\nnot Contralto(ardis)\nEmulate(ardis, tannie)\nforall x (Uncouple(x, ardis) and Reptilian(ardis) -> not Ingeminate(x, ardis))\nEmulate(ardis, tannie) -> Reptilian(ardis)\n\nnot Ingeminate(kelley, ardis)\n\nEmulate(ardis, tannie) and Emulate(ardis, tannie) -> Reptilian(ardis) -> therefore Reptilian(ardis) Uncouple(kelley, ardis) and Reptilian(ardis) and forall x (Uncouple(x, ardis) and Reptilian(ardis) -> not Ingeminate(x, ardis)) -> therefore not Ingeminate(kelley, ardis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The sisely brainstorm the orazio. The sisely is not blushful. The emyle brainstorm the sisely. The emyle is urethral. The emyle express the sisely. The emyle express the orazio. The orazio enunciate the emyle. The orazio is dexter. The orazio is not doomed. The orazio express the emyle. If something brainstorm the orazio and the orazio is urethral then it does not eat the orazio. If the orazio express the emyle then the orazio is urethral. The sisely enunciate the orazio.", "logic": "\nBrainstorm(sisely, orazio)\nnot Blushful(sisely)\nBrainstorm(emyle, sisely)\nUrethral(emyle)\nExpress(emyle, sisely)\nExpress(emyle, orazio)\nEnunciate(orazio, emyle)\nDexter(orazio)\nnot Doomed(orazio)\nExpress(orazio, emyle)\nforall x (Brainstorm(x, orazio) and Urethral(orazio) -> not Enunciate(x, orazio))\nExpress(orazio, emyle) -> Urethral(orazio)\n\nEnunciate(sisely, orazio)\n\nExpress(orazio, emyle) and Express(orazio, emyle) -> Urethral(orazio) -> therefore Urethral(orazio) Brainstorm(sisely, orazio) and Urethral(orazio) and forall x (Brainstorm(x, orazio) and Urethral(orazio) -> not Enunciate(x, orazio)) -> therefore not Enunciate(sisely, orazio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The manny misspeak the eleanore. The manny is not czaristic. The pieter misspeak the manny. The pieter is moldable. The pieter procreate the manny. The pieter procreate the eleanore. The eleanore monopolize the pieter. The eleanore is bombproof. The eleanore is not formic. The eleanore procreate the pieter. If something misspeak the eleanore and the eleanore is moldable then it does not eat the eleanore. If the eleanore procreate the pieter then the eleanore is moldable. The pieter does not eat the pieter.", "logic": "\nMisspeak(manny, eleanore)\nnot Czaristic(manny)\nMisspeak(pieter, manny)\nMoldable(pieter)\nProcreate(pieter, manny)\nProcreate(pieter, eleanore)\nMonopolize(eleanore, pieter)\nBombproof(eleanore)\nnot Formic(eleanore)\nProcreate(eleanore, pieter)\nforall x (Misspeak(x, eleanore) and Moldable(eleanore) -> not Monopolize(x, eleanore))\nProcreate(eleanore, pieter) -> Moldable(eleanore)\n\nnot Monopolize(pieter, pieter)\n\nnot Monopolize(pieter, pieter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The matthus invalid the lianne. The matthus is not tramontane. The trina invalid the matthus. The trina is discerning. The trina utilize the matthus. The trina utilize the lianne. The lianne embroil the trina. The lianne is naval. The lianne is not unnoticed. The lianne utilize the trina. If something invalid the lianne and the lianne is discerning then it does not eat the lianne. If the lianne utilize the trina then the lianne is discerning. The lianne invalid the trina.", "logic": "\nInvalid(matthus, lianne)\nnot Tramontane(matthus)\nInvalid(trina, matthus)\nDiscerning(trina)\nUtilize(trina, matthus)\nUtilize(trina, lianne)\nEmbroil(lianne, trina)\nNaval(lianne)\nnot Unnoticed(lianne)\nUtilize(lianne, trina)\nforall x (Invalid(x, lianne) and Discerning(lianne) -> not Embroil(x, lianne))\nUtilize(lianne, trina) -> Discerning(lianne)\n\nInvalid(lianne, trina)\n\nInvalid(lianne, trina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The town vowelise the cliff. The town is not binomial. The tirrell vowelise the town. The tirrell is ignitible. The tirrell perfume the town. The tirrell perfume the cliff. The cliff round the tirrell. The cliff is amoebic. The cliff is not invincible. The cliff perfume the tirrell. If something vowelise the cliff and the cliff is ignitible then it does not eat the cliff. If the cliff perfume the tirrell then the cliff is ignitible. The tirrell does not visit the tirrell.", "logic": "\nVowelise(town, cliff)\nnot Binomial(town)\nVowelise(tirrell, town)\nIgnitible(tirrell)\nPerfume(tirrell, town)\nPerfume(tirrell, cliff)\nRound(cliff, tirrell)\nAmoebic(cliff)\nnot Invincible(cliff)\nPerfume(cliff, tirrell)\nforall x (Vowelise(x, cliff) and Ignitible(cliff) -> not Round(x, cliff))\nPerfume(cliff, tirrell) -> Ignitible(cliff)\n\nnot Perfume(tirrell, tirrell)\n\nnot Perfume(tirrell, tirrell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The doralia moralize the paulita. The doralia is not blate. The marquita moralize the doralia. The marquita is fatalistic. The marquita victual the doralia. The marquita victual the paulita. The paulita scratch the marquita. The paulita is dantesque. The paulita is not germfree. The paulita victual the marquita. If something moralize the paulita and the paulita is fatalistic then it does not eat the paulita. If the paulita victual the marquita then the paulita is fatalistic. The marquita is cold.", "logic": "\nMoralize(doralia, paulita)\nnot Blate(doralia)\nMoralize(marquita, doralia)\nFatalistic(marquita)\nVictual(marquita, doralia)\nVictual(marquita, paulita)\nScratch(paulita, marquita)\nDantesque(paulita)\nnot Germfree(paulita)\nVictual(paulita, marquita)\nforall x (Moralize(x, paulita) and Fatalistic(paulita) -> not Scratch(x, paulita))\nVictual(paulita, marquita) -> Fatalistic(paulita)\n\nCold(marquita)\n\nCold(marquita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The donna theorise the fedora. The donna is not balmy. The maynard theorise the donna. The maynard is nonpareil. The maynard recode the donna. The maynard recode the fedora. The fedora embody the maynard. The fedora is belted. The fedora is not blameful. The fedora recode the maynard. If something theorise the fedora and the fedora is nonpareil then it does not eat the fedora. If the fedora recode the maynard then the fedora is nonpareil. The maynard is not balmy.", "logic": "\nTheorise(donna, fedora)\nnot Balmy(donna)\nTheorise(maynard, donna)\nNonpareil(maynard)\nRecode(maynard, donna)\nRecode(maynard, fedora)\nEmbody(fedora, maynard)\nBelted(fedora)\nnot Blameful(fedora)\nRecode(fedora, maynard)\nforall x (Theorise(x, fedora) and Nonpareil(fedora) -> not Embody(x, fedora))\nRecode(fedora, maynard) -> Nonpareil(fedora)\n\nnot Balmy(maynard)\n\nnot Balmy(maynard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The vittoria character the dehlia. The vittoria is not donatist. The renelle character the vittoria. The renelle is zero. The renelle razor the vittoria. The renelle razor the dehlia. The dehlia terrace the renelle. The dehlia is impuissant. The dehlia is not overladen. The dehlia razor the renelle. If something character the dehlia and the dehlia is zero then it does not eat the dehlia. If the dehlia razor the renelle then the dehlia is zero. The vittoria is zero.", "logic": "\nCharacter(vittoria, dehlia)\nnot Donatist(vittoria)\nCharacter(renelle, vittoria)\nZero(renelle)\nRazor(renelle, vittoria)\nRazor(renelle, dehlia)\nTerrace(dehlia, renelle)\nImpuissant(dehlia)\nnot Overladen(dehlia)\nRazor(dehlia, renelle)\nforall x (Character(x, dehlia) and Zero(dehlia) -> not Terrace(x, dehlia))\nRazor(dehlia, renelle) -> Zero(dehlia)\n\nZero(vittoria)\n\nZero(vittoria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-663"} {"premises": "The deva crumple the paola. The paola compare the cecile. The alyssa wager the paola. The cecile does not visit the deva. If something crumple the paola then it is not privy. If something is privy and it compare the cecile then it compare the paola. If something is privy and it wager the alyssa then the alyssa does not chase the cecile. If something compare the cecile then the cecile crumple the paola. If something wager the paola then it is frolicky. If something compare the paola then the paola wager the alyssa. The deva crumple the paola.", "logic": "\nCrumple(deva, paola)\nCompare(paola, cecile)\nWager(alyssa, paola)\nnot Crumple(cecile, deva)\nforall x (Crumple(x, paola) -> not Privy(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) and Compare(x, cecile) -> Compare(x, paola))\nforall x (Privy(x) and Wager(x, alyssa) -> not Wager(alyssa, cecile))\nforall x (Compare(x, cecile) -> Crumple(cecile, paola))\nforall x (Wager(x, paola) -> Frolicky(x))\nforall x (Compare(x, paola) -> Wager(paola, alyssa))\n\nCrumple(deva, paola)\n\ntherefore Crumple(deva, paola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The bathsheba lobby the quint. The quint recline the renato. The reta stable the quint. The renato does not visit the bathsheba. If something lobby the quint then it is not hugoesque. If something is hugoesque and it recline the renato then it recline the quint. If something is hugoesque and it stable the reta then the reta does not chase the renato. If something recline the renato then the renato lobby the quint. If something stable the quint then it is realised. If something recline the quint then the quint stable the reta. The reta does not chase the quint.", "logic": "\nLobby(bathsheba, quint)\nRecline(quint, renato)\nStable(reta, quint)\nnot Lobby(renato, bathsheba)\nforall x (Lobby(x, quint) -> not Hugoesque(x))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) and Recline(x, renato) -> Recline(x, quint))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) and Stable(x, reta) -> not Stable(reta, renato))\nforall x (Recline(x, renato) -> Lobby(renato, quint))\nforall x (Stable(x, quint) -> Realised(x))\nforall x (Recline(x, quint) -> Stable(quint, reta))\n\nnot Stable(reta, quint)\n\ntherefore Stable(reta, quint)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The celestyn bless the jenine. The jenine muck the darien. The shina subtract the jenine. The darien does not visit the celestyn. If something bless the jenine then it is not sold. If something is sold and it muck the darien then it muck the jenine. If something is sold and it subtract the shina then the shina does not chase the darien. If something muck the darien then the darien bless the jenine. If something subtract the jenine then it is anaclinal. If something muck the jenine then the jenine subtract the shina. The celestyn is not sold.", "logic": "\nBless(celestyn, jenine)\nMuck(jenine, darien)\nSubtract(shina, jenine)\nnot Bless(darien, celestyn)\nforall x (Bless(x, jenine) -> not Sold(x))\nforall x (Sold(x) and Muck(x, darien) -> Muck(x, jenine))\nforall x (Sold(x) and Subtract(x, shina) -> not Subtract(shina, darien))\nforall x (Muck(x, darien) -> Bless(darien, jenine))\nforall x (Subtract(x, jenine) -> Anaclinal(x))\nforall x (Muck(x, jenine) -> Subtract(jenine, shina))\n\nnot Sold(celestyn)\n\nBless(celestyn, jenine) and forall x (Bless(x, jenine) -> not Sold(x)) -> therefore not Sold(celestyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The dusty sunder the maisey. The maisey mutate the brianne. The cindy wheedle the maisey. The brianne does not visit the dusty. If something sunder the maisey then it is not occurrent. If something is occurrent and it mutate the brianne then it mutate the maisey. If something is occurrent and it wheedle the cindy then the cindy does not chase the brianne. If something mutate the brianne then the brianne sunder the maisey. If something wheedle the maisey then it is chordate. If something mutate the maisey then the maisey wheedle the cindy. The cindy is not chordate.", "logic": "\nSunder(dusty, maisey)\nMutate(maisey, brianne)\nWheedle(cindy, maisey)\nnot Sunder(brianne, dusty)\nforall x (Sunder(x, maisey) -> not Occurrent(x))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) and Mutate(x, brianne) -> Mutate(x, maisey))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) and Wheedle(x, cindy) -> not Wheedle(cindy, brianne))\nforall x (Mutate(x, brianne) -> Sunder(brianne, maisey))\nforall x (Wheedle(x, maisey) -> Chordate(x))\nforall x (Mutate(x, maisey) -> Wheedle(maisey, cindy))\n\nnot Chordate(cindy)\n\nWheedle(cindy, maisey) and forall x (Wheedle(x, maisey) -> Chordate(x)) -> therefore Chordate(cindy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The thaxter coif the steffane. The steffane unblock the heinz. The secunda develop the steffane. The heinz does not visit the thaxter. If something coif the steffane then it is not whitish. If something is whitish and it unblock the heinz then it unblock the steffane. If something is whitish and it develop the secunda then the secunda does not chase the heinz. If something unblock the heinz then the heinz coif the steffane. If something develop the steffane then it is keynesian. If something unblock the steffane then the steffane develop the secunda. The heinz is not whitish.", "logic": "\nCoif(thaxter, steffane)\nUnblock(steffane, heinz)\nDevelop(secunda, steffane)\nnot Coif(heinz, thaxter)\nforall x (Coif(x, steffane) -> not Whitish(x))\nforall x (Whitish(x) and Unblock(x, heinz) -> Unblock(x, steffane))\nforall x (Whitish(x) and Develop(x, secunda) -> not Develop(secunda, heinz))\nforall x (Unblock(x, heinz) -> Coif(heinz, steffane))\nforall x (Develop(x, steffane) -> Keynesian(x))\nforall x (Unblock(x, steffane) -> Develop(steffane, secunda))\n\nnot Whitish(heinz)\n\nUnblock(steffane, heinz) and forall x (Unblock(x, heinz) -> Coif(heinz, steffane)) -> therefore Coif(heinz, steffane) Coif(heinz, steffane) and forall x (Coif(x, steffane) -> not Whitish(x)) -> therefore not Whitish(heinz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The kelvin curse the stevana. The stevana assert the wilek. The abbi apologise the stevana. The wilek does not visit the kelvin. If something curse the stevana then it is not episodic. If something is episodic and it assert the wilek then it assert the stevana. If something is episodic and it apologise the abbi then the abbi does not chase the wilek. If something assert the wilek then the wilek curse the stevana. If something apologise the stevana then it is cumbersome. If something assert the stevana then the stevana apologise the abbi. The wilek is episodic.", "logic": "\nCurse(kelvin, stevana)\nAssert(stevana, wilek)\nApologise(abbi, stevana)\nnot Curse(wilek, kelvin)\nforall x (Curse(x, stevana) -> not Episodic(x))\nforall x (Episodic(x) and Assert(x, wilek) -> Assert(x, stevana))\nforall x (Episodic(x) and Apologise(x, abbi) -> not Apologise(abbi, wilek))\nforall x (Assert(x, wilek) -> Curse(wilek, stevana))\nforall x (Apologise(x, stevana) -> Cumbersome(x))\nforall x (Assert(x, stevana) -> Apologise(stevana, abbi))\n\nEpisodic(wilek)\n\nAssert(stevana, wilek) and forall x (Assert(x, wilek) -> Curse(wilek, stevana)) -> therefore Curse(wilek, stevana) Curse(wilek, stevana) and forall x (Curse(x, stevana) -> not Episodic(x)) -> therefore not Episodic(wilek)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The kaycee repot the junia. The junia cloy the florinda. The eberhard smock the junia. The florinda does not visit the kaycee. If something repot the junia then it is not blissful. If something is blissful and it cloy the florinda then it cloy the junia. If something is blissful and it smock the eberhard then the eberhard does not chase the florinda. If something cloy the florinda then the florinda repot the junia. If something smock the junia then it is extensible. If something cloy the junia then the junia smock the eberhard. The florinda does not see the junia.", "logic": "\nRepot(kaycee, junia)\nCloy(junia, florinda)\nSmock(eberhard, junia)\nnot Repot(florinda, kaycee)\nforall x (Repot(x, junia) -> not Blissful(x))\nforall x (Blissful(x) and Cloy(x, florinda) -> Cloy(x, junia))\nforall x (Blissful(x) and Smock(x, eberhard) -> not Smock(eberhard, florinda))\nforall x (Cloy(x, florinda) -> Repot(florinda, junia))\nforall x (Smock(x, junia) -> Extensible(x))\nforall x (Cloy(x, junia) -> Smock(junia, eberhard))\n\nnot Cloy(florinda, junia)\n\nforall x (Blissful(x) and Cloy(x, florinda) -> Cloy(x, junia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The willdon report the dew. The dew bicker the nora. The kylila treasure the dew. The nora does not visit the willdon. If something report the dew then it is not plane. If something is plane and it bicker the nora then it bicker the dew. If something is plane and it treasure the kylila then the kylila does not chase the nora. If something bicker the nora then the nora report the dew. If something treasure the dew then it is enlivening. If something bicker the dew then the dew treasure the kylila. The kylila bicker the dew.", "logic": "\nReport(willdon, dew)\nBicker(dew, nora)\nTreasure(kylila, dew)\nnot Report(nora, willdon)\nforall x (Report(x, dew) -> not Plane(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) and Bicker(x, nora) -> Bicker(x, dew))\nforall x (Plane(x) and Treasure(x, kylila) -> not Treasure(kylila, nora))\nforall x (Bicker(x, nora) -> Report(nora, dew))\nforall x (Treasure(x, dew) -> Enlivening(x))\nforall x (Bicker(x, dew) -> Treasure(dew, kylila))\n\nBicker(kylila, dew)\n\nforall x (Plane(x) and Bicker(x, nora) -> Bicker(x, dew)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The monty feminize the tobi. The tobi mismatch the meghan. The gerald bald the tobi. The meghan does not visit the monty. If something feminize the tobi then it is not displeased. If something is displeased and it mismatch the meghan then it mismatch the tobi. If something is displeased and it bald the gerald then the gerald does not chase the meghan. If something mismatch the meghan then the meghan feminize the tobi. If something bald the tobi then it is articled. If something mismatch the tobi then the tobi bald the gerald. The tobi does not chase the gerald.", "logic": "\nFeminize(monty, tobi)\nMismatch(tobi, meghan)\nBald(gerald, tobi)\nnot Feminize(meghan, monty)\nforall x (Feminize(x, tobi) -> not Displeased(x))\nforall x (Displeased(x) and Mismatch(x, meghan) -> Mismatch(x, tobi))\nforall x (Displeased(x) and Bald(x, gerald) -> not Bald(gerald, meghan))\nforall x (Mismatch(x, meghan) -> Feminize(meghan, tobi))\nforall x (Bald(x, tobi) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Mismatch(x, tobi) -> Bald(tobi, gerald))\n\nnot Bald(tobi, gerald)\n\nforall x (Mismatch(x, tobi) -> Bald(tobi, gerald)) <- forall x (Displeased(x) and Mismatch(x, meghan) -> Mismatch(x, tobi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The aloysius pompadour the giacinta. The giacinta unitise the arther. The kanya dictate the giacinta. The arther does not visit the aloysius. If something pompadour the giacinta then it is not shambolic. If something is shambolic and it unitise the arther then it unitise the giacinta. If something is shambolic and it dictate the kanya then the kanya does not chase the arther. If something unitise the arther then the arther pompadour the giacinta. If something dictate the giacinta then it is taillike. If something unitise the giacinta then the giacinta dictate the kanya. The kanya pompadour the aloysius.", "logic": "\nPompadour(aloysius, giacinta)\nUnitise(giacinta, arther)\nDictate(kanya, giacinta)\nnot Pompadour(arther, aloysius)\nforall x (Pompadour(x, giacinta) -> not Shambolic(x))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Unitise(x, arther) -> Unitise(x, giacinta))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Dictate(x, kanya) -> not Dictate(kanya, arther))\nforall x (Unitise(x, arther) -> Pompadour(arther, giacinta))\nforall x (Dictate(x, giacinta) -> Taillike(x))\nforall x (Unitise(x, giacinta) -> Dictate(giacinta, kanya))\n\nPompadour(kanya, aloysius)\n\nPompadour(kanya, aloysius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The harman unsheathe the howard. The howard joust the shaylyn. The floris systemise the howard. The shaylyn does not visit the harman. If something unsheathe the howard then it is not bayesian. If something is bayesian and it joust the shaylyn then it joust the howard. If something is bayesian and it systemise the floris then the floris does not chase the shaylyn. If something joust the shaylyn then the shaylyn unsheathe the howard. If something systemise the howard then it is piebald. If something joust the howard then the howard systemise the floris. The harman does not visit the floris.", "logic": "\nUnsheathe(harman, howard)\nJoust(howard, shaylyn)\nSystemise(floris, howard)\nnot Unsheathe(shaylyn, harman)\nforall x (Unsheathe(x, howard) -> not Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Bayesian(x) and Joust(x, shaylyn) -> Joust(x, howard))\nforall x (Bayesian(x) and Systemise(x, floris) -> not Systemise(floris, shaylyn))\nforall x (Joust(x, shaylyn) -> Unsheathe(shaylyn, howard))\nforall x (Systemise(x, howard) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Joust(x, howard) -> Systemise(howard, floris))\n\nnot Unsheathe(harman, floris)\n\nnot Unsheathe(harman, floris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The raoul tickle the colette. The colette castrate the sharron. The gere apostatise the colette. The sharron does not visit the raoul. If something tickle the colette then it is not cerulean. If something is cerulean and it castrate the sharron then it castrate the colette. If something is cerulean and it apostatise the gere then the gere does not chase the sharron. If something castrate the sharron then the sharron tickle the colette. If something apostatise the colette then it is adequate. If something castrate the colette then the colette apostatise the gere. The gere is cerulean.", "logic": "\nTickle(raoul, colette)\nCastrate(colette, sharron)\nApostatise(gere, colette)\nnot Tickle(sharron, raoul)\nforall x (Tickle(x, colette) -> not Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Cerulean(x) and Castrate(x, sharron) -> Castrate(x, colette))\nforall x (Cerulean(x) and Apostatise(x, gere) -> not Apostatise(gere, sharron))\nforall x (Castrate(x, sharron) -> Tickle(sharron, colette))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, colette) -> Adequate(x))\nforall x (Castrate(x, colette) -> Apostatise(colette, gere))\n\nCerulean(gere)\n\nCerulean(gere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-508"} {"premises": "The ximenez is adsorbable. The zita is adsorbable. The zita is accursed. The zita exorcise the ximenez. The zita exorcise the emilio. The zita crossbreed the ximenez. The zita crossbreed the yanaton. The emilio collapse the ximenez. The emilio collapse the yanaton. The emilio is accursed. The emilio is mirthful. The yanaton is adsorbable. The yanaton exorcise the emilio. The yanaton crossbreed the zita. The yanaton crossbreed the emilio. If someone crossbreed the zita and the zita is accursed then they are mirthful. If someone exorcise the emilio then they eat the zita. If someone is accursed then they see the emilio. If the emilio crossbreed the yanaton and the emilio is reclaimed then the yanaton crossbreed the emilio. If the yanaton collapse the zita then the zita is barytic. If someone collapse the ximenez and they eat the zita then the ximenez exorcise the yanaton. If someone is reclaimed then they visit the emilio. If the yanaton collapse the emilio and the yanaton is reclaimed then the yanaton crossbreed the zita. The zita crossbreed the yanaton.", "logic": "\nAdsorbable(ximenez)\nAdsorbable(zita)\nAccursed(zita)\nExorcise(zita, ximenez)\nExorcise(zita, emilio)\nCrossbreed(zita, ximenez)\nCrossbreed(zita, yanaton)\nCollapse(emilio, ximenez)\nCollapse(emilio, yanaton)\nAccursed(emilio)\nMirthful(emilio)\nAdsorbable(yanaton)\nExorcise(yanaton, emilio)\nCrossbreed(yanaton, zita)\nCrossbreed(yanaton, emilio)\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, zita) and Accursed(zita) -> Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, emilio) -> Collapse(x, zita))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Exorcise(x, emilio))\nCrossbreed(emilio, yanaton) and Reclaimed(emilio) -> Crossbreed(yanaton, emilio)\nCollapse(yanaton, zita) -> Barytic(zita)\nforall x (Collapse(x, ximenez) and Collapse(x, zita) -> Exorcise(ximenez, yanaton))\nforall x (Reclaimed(x) -> Crossbreed(x, emilio))\nCollapse(yanaton, emilio) and Reclaimed(yanaton) -> Crossbreed(yanaton, zita)\n\nCrossbreed(zita, yanaton)\n\ntherefore Crossbreed(zita, yanaton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The richie is chatty. The dominique is chatty. The dominique is based. The dominique interlace the richie. The dominique interlace the wendeline. The dominique swill the richie. The dominique swill the donella. The wendeline predestine the richie. The wendeline predestine the donella. The wendeline is based. The wendeline is falconine. The donella is chatty. The donella interlace the wendeline. The donella swill the dominique. The donella swill the wendeline. If someone swill the dominique and the dominique is based then they are falconine. If someone interlace the wendeline then they eat the dominique. If someone is based then they see the wendeline. If the wendeline swill the donella and the wendeline is rheumatic then the donella swill the wendeline. If the donella predestine the dominique then the dominique is reflective. If someone predestine the richie and they eat the dominique then the richie interlace the donella. If someone is rheumatic then they visit the wendeline. If the donella predestine the wendeline and the donella is rheumatic then the donella swill the dominique. The wendeline is not falconine.", "logic": "\nChatty(richie)\nChatty(dominique)\nBased(dominique)\nInterlace(dominique, richie)\nInterlace(dominique, wendeline)\nSwill(dominique, richie)\nSwill(dominique, donella)\nPredestine(wendeline, richie)\nPredestine(wendeline, donella)\nBased(wendeline)\nFalconine(wendeline)\nChatty(donella)\nInterlace(donella, wendeline)\nSwill(donella, dominique)\nSwill(donella, wendeline)\nforall x (Swill(x, dominique) and Based(dominique) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Interlace(x, wendeline) -> Predestine(x, dominique))\nforall x (Based(x) -> Interlace(x, wendeline))\nSwill(wendeline, donella) and Rheumatic(wendeline) -> Swill(donella, wendeline)\nPredestine(donella, dominique) -> Reflective(dominique)\nforall x (Predestine(x, richie) and Predestine(x, dominique) -> Interlace(richie, donella))\nforall x (Rheumatic(x) -> Swill(x, wendeline))\nPredestine(donella, wendeline) and Rheumatic(donella) -> Swill(donella, dominique)\n\nnot Falconine(wendeline)\n\ntherefore Falconine(wendeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The augustine is epidermal. The derick is epidermal. The derick is precursory. The derick plumb the augustine. The derick plumb the tiphani. The derick pile the augustine. The derick pile the cyndi. The tiphani forefend the augustine. The tiphani forefend the cyndi. The tiphani is precursory. The tiphani is light. The cyndi is epidermal. The cyndi plumb the tiphani. The cyndi pile the derick. The cyndi pile the tiphani. If someone pile the derick and the derick is precursory then they are light. If someone plumb the tiphani then they eat the derick. If someone is precursory then they see the tiphani. If the tiphani pile the cyndi and the tiphani is balmy then the cyndi pile the tiphani. If the cyndi forefend the derick then the derick is quirky. If someone forefend the augustine and they eat the derick then the augustine plumb the cyndi. If someone is balmy then they visit the tiphani. If the cyndi forefend the tiphani and the cyndi is balmy then the cyndi pile the derick. The tiphani plumb the tiphani.", "logic": "\nEpidermal(augustine)\nEpidermal(derick)\nPrecursory(derick)\nPlumb(derick, augustine)\nPlumb(derick, tiphani)\nPile(derick, augustine)\nPile(derick, cyndi)\nForefend(tiphani, augustine)\nForefend(tiphani, cyndi)\nPrecursory(tiphani)\nLight(tiphani)\nEpidermal(cyndi)\nPlumb(cyndi, tiphani)\nPile(cyndi, derick)\nPile(cyndi, tiphani)\nforall x (Pile(x, derick) and Precursory(derick) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Plumb(x, tiphani) -> Forefend(x, derick))\nforall x (Precursory(x) -> Plumb(x, tiphani))\nPile(tiphani, cyndi) and Balmy(tiphani) -> Pile(cyndi, tiphani)\nForefend(cyndi, derick) -> Quirky(derick)\nforall x (Forefend(x, augustine) and Forefend(x, derick) -> Plumb(augustine, cyndi))\nforall x (Balmy(x) -> Pile(x, tiphani))\nForefend(cyndi, tiphani) and Balmy(cyndi) -> Pile(cyndi, derick)\n\nPlumb(tiphani, tiphani)\n\nPrecursory(tiphani) and forall x (Precursory(x) -> Plumb(x, tiphani)) -> therefore Plumb(tiphani, tiphani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The nydia is painterly. The hernando is painterly. The hernando is dissonant. The hernando literalize the nydia. The hernando literalize the august. The hernando salve the nydia. The hernando salve the margalo. The august floor the nydia. The august floor the margalo. The august is dissonant. The august is grownup. The margalo is painterly. The margalo literalize the august. The margalo salve the hernando. The margalo salve the august. If someone salve the hernando and the hernando is dissonant then they are grownup. If someone literalize the august then they eat the hernando. If someone is dissonant then they see the august. If the august salve the margalo and the august is musky then the margalo salve the august. If the margalo floor the hernando then the hernando is jocund. If someone floor the nydia and they eat the hernando then the nydia literalize the margalo. If someone is musky then they visit the august. If the margalo floor the august and the margalo is musky then the margalo salve the hernando. The august does not see the august.", "logic": "\nPainterly(nydia)\nPainterly(hernando)\nDissonant(hernando)\nLiteralize(hernando, nydia)\nLiteralize(hernando, august)\nSalve(hernando, nydia)\nSalve(hernando, margalo)\nFloor(august, nydia)\nFloor(august, margalo)\nDissonant(august)\nGrownup(august)\nPainterly(margalo)\nLiteralize(margalo, august)\nSalve(margalo, hernando)\nSalve(margalo, august)\nforall x (Salve(x, hernando) and Dissonant(hernando) -> Grownup(x))\nforall x (Literalize(x, august) -> Floor(x, hernando))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Literalize(x, august))\nSalve(august, margalo) and Musky(august) -> Salve(margalo, august)\nFloor(margalo, hernando) -> Jocund(hernando)\nforall x (Floor(x, nydia) and Floor(x, hernando) -> Literalize(nydia, margalo))\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Salve(x, august))\nFloor(margalo, august) and Musky(margalo) -> Salve(margalo, hernando)\n\nnot Literalize(august, august)\n\nDissonant(august) and forall x (Dissonant(x) -> Literalize(x, august)) -> therefore Literalize(august, august)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The esteban is emboldened. The hassan is emboldened. The hassan is grumbling. The hassan cloister the esteban. The hassan cloister the guendolen. The hassan lengthen the esteban. The hassan lengthen the sib. The guendolen roil the esteban. The guendolen roil the sib. The guendolen is grumbling. The guendolen is foliolate. The sib is emboldened. The sib cloister the guendolen. The sib lengthen the hassan. The sib lengthen the guendolen. If someone lengthen the hassan and the hassan is grumbling then they are foliolate. If someone cloister the guendolen then they eat the hassan. If someone is grumbling then they see the guendolen. If the guendolen lengthen the sib and the guendolen is outlaw then the sib lengthen the guendolen. If the sib roil the hassan then the hassan is invidious. If someone roil the esteban and they eat the hassan then the esteban cloister the sib. If someone is outlaw then they visit the guendolen. If the sib roil the guendolen and the sib is outlaw then the sib lengthen the hassan. The hassan is invidious.", "logic": "\nEmboldened(esteban)\nEmboldened(hassan)\nGrumbling(hassan)\nCloister(hassan, esteban)\nCloister(hassan, guendolen)\nLengthen(hassan, esteban)\nLengthen(hassan, sib)\nRoil(guendolen, esteban)\nRoil(guendolen, sib)\nGrumbling(guendolen)\nFoliolate(guendolen)\nEmboldened(sib)\nCloister(sib, guendolen)\nLengthen(sib, hassan)\nLengthen(sib, guendolen)\nforall x (Lengthen(x, hassan) and Grumbling(hassan) -> Foliolate(x))\nforall x (Cloister(x, guendolen) -> Roil(x, hassan))\nforall x (Grumbling(x) -> Cloister(x, guendolen))\nLengthen(guendolen, sib) and Outlaw(guendolen) -> Lengthen(sib, guendolen)\nRoil(sib, hassan) -> Invidious(hassan)\nforall x (Roil(x, esteban) and Roil(x, hassan) -> Cloister(esteban, sib))\nforall x (Outlaw(x) -> Lengthen(x, guendolen))\nRoil(sib, guendolen) and Outlaw(sib) -> Lengthen(sib, hassan)\n\nInvidious(hassan)\n\nCloister(sib, guendolen) and forall x (Cloister(x, guendolen) -> Roil(x, hassan)) -> therefore Roil(sib, hassan) Roil(sib, hassan) and Roil(sib, hassan) -> Invidious(hassan) -> therefore Invidious(hassan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The bria is byzantine. The nancie is byzantine. The nancie is offstage. The nancie bombproof the bria. The nancie bombproof the alma. The nancie scarper the bria. The nancie scarper the sheffie. The alma impanel the bria. The alma impanel the sheffie. The alma is offstage. The alma is liquified. The sheffie is byzantine. The sheffie bombproof the alma. The sheffie scarper the nancie. The sheffie scarper the alma. If someone scarper the nancie and the nancie is offstage then they are liquified. If someone bombproof the alma then they eat the nancie. If someone is offstage then they see the alma. If the alma scarper the sheffie and the alma is feculent then the sheffie scarper the alma. If the sheffie impanel the nancie then the nancie is barbecued. If someone impanel the bria and they eat the nancie then the bria bombproof the sheffie. If someone is feculent then they visit the alma. If the sheffie impanel the alma and the sheffie is feculent then the sheffie scarper the nancie. The nancie is not barbecued.", "logic": "\nByzantine(bria)\nByzantine(nancie)\nOffstage(nancie)\nBombproof(nancie, bria)\nBombproof(nancie, alma)\nScarper(nancie, bria)\nScarper(nancie, sheffie)\nImpanel(alma, bria)\nImpanel(alma, sheffie)\nOffstage(alma)\nLiquified(alma)\nByzantine(sheffie)\nBombproof(sheffie, alma)\nScarper(sheffie, nancie)\nScarper(sheffie, alma)\nforall x (Scarper(x, nancie) and Offstage(nancie) -> Liquified(x))\nforall x (Bombproof(x, alma) -> Impanel(x, nancie))\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Bombproof(x, alma))\nScarper(alma, sheffie) and Feculent(alma) -> Scarper(sheffie, alma)\nImpanel(sheffie, nancie) -> Barbecued(nancie)\nforall x (Impanel(x, bria) and Impanel(x, nancie) -> Bombproof(bria, sheffie))\nforall x (Feculent(x) -> Scarper(x, alma))\nImpanel(sheffie, alma) and Feculent(sheffie) -> Scarper(sheffie, nancie)\n\nnot Barbecued(nancie)\n\nBombproof(sheffie, alma) and forall x (Bombproof(x, alma) -> Impanel(x, nancie)) -> therefore Impanel(sheffie, nancie) Impanel(sheffie, nancie) and Impanel(sheffie, nancie) -> Barbecued(nancie) -> therefore Barbecued(nancie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The prudy is curtained. The aurore is curtained. The aurore is lumbar. The aurore logroll the prudy. The aurore logroll the corky. The aurore service the prudy. The aurore service the hyacinth. The corky retouch the prudy. The corky retouch the hyacinth. The corky is lumbar. The corky is typical. The hyacinth is curtained. The hyacinth logroll the corky. The hyacinth service the aurore. The hyacinth service the corky. If someone service the aurore and the aurore is lumbar then they are typical. If someone logroll the corky then they eat the aurore. If someone is lumbar then they see the corky. If the corky service the hyacinth and the corky is seagoing then the hyacinth service the corky. If the hyacinth retouch the aurore then the aurore is monoatomic. If someone retouch the prudy and they eat the aurore then the prudy logroll the hyacinth. If someone is seagoing then they visit the corky. If the hyacinth retouch the corky and the hyacinth is seagoing then the hyacinth service the aurore. The prudy does not eat the aurore.", "logic": "\nCurtained(prudy)\nCurtained(aurore)\nLumbar(aurore)\nLogroll(aurore, prudy)\nLogroll(aurore, corky)\nService(aurore, prudy)\nService(aurore, hyacinth)\nRetouch(corky, prudy)\nRetouch(corky, hyacinth)\nLumbar(corky)\nTypical(corky)\nCurtained(hyacinth)\nLogroll(hyacinth, corky)\nService(hyacinth, aurore)\nService(hyacinth, corky)\nforall x (Service(x, aurore) and Lumbar(aurore) -> Typical(x))\nforall x (Logroll(x, corky) -> Retouch(x, aurore))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) -> Logroll(x, corky))\nService(corky, hyacinth) and Seagoing(corky) -> Service(hyacinth, corky)\nRetouch(hyacinth, aurore) -> Monoatomic(aurore)\nforall x (Retouch(x, prudy) and Retouch(x, aurore) -> Logroll(prudy, hyacinth))\nforall x (Seagoing(x) -> Service(x, corky))\nRetouch(hyacinth, corky) and Seagoing(hyacinth) -> Service(hyacinth, aurore)\n\nnot Retouch(prudy, aurore)\n\nforall x (Logroll(x, corky) -> Retouch(x, aurore)) <- forall x (Lumbar(x) -> Logroll(x, corky)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The joanne is curt. The burta is curt. The burta is ghanian. The burta scollop the joanne. The burta scollop the oran. The burta tarry the joanne. The burta tarry the onlea. The oran featherbed the joanne. The oran featherbed the onlea. The oran is ghanian. The oran is squawky. The onlea is curt. The onlea scollop the oran. The onlea tarry the burta. The onlea tarry the oran. If someone tarry the burta and the burta is ghanian then they are squawky. If someone scollop the oran then they eat the burta. If someone is ghanian then they see the oran. If the oran tarry the onlea and the oran is hefty then the onlea tarry the oran. If the onlea featherbed the burta then the burta is ungraded. If someone featherbed the joanne and they eat the burta then the joanne scollop the onlea. If someone is hefty then they visit the oran. If the onlea featherbed the oran and the onlea is hefty then the onlea tarry the burta. The joanne is squawky.", "logic": "\nCurt(joanne)\nCurt(burta)\nGhanian(burta)\nScollop(burta, joanne)\nScollop(burta, oran)\nTarry(burta, joanne)\nTarry(burta, onlea)\nFeatherbed(oran, joanne)\nFeatherbed(oran, onlea)\nGhanian(oran)\nSquawky(oran)\nCurt(onlea)\nScollop(onlea, oran)\nTarry(onlea, burta)\nTarry(onlea, oran)\nforall x (Tarry(x, burta) and Ghanian(burta) -> Squawky(x))\nforall x (Scollop(x, oran) -> Featherbed(x, burta))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Scollop(x, oran))\nTarry(oran, onlea) and Hefty(oran) -> Tarry(onlea, oran)\nFeatherbed(onlea, burta) -> Ungraded(burta)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, joanne) and Featherbed(x, burta) -> Scollop(joanne, onlea))\nforall x (Hefty(x) -> Tarry(x, oran))\nFeatherbed(onlea, oran) and Hefty(onlea) -> Tarry(onlea, burta)\n\nSquawky(joanne)\n\nforall x (Tarry(x, burta) and Ghanian(burta) -> Squawky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The oleg is unveiled. The timi is unveiled. The timi is ongoing. The timi shush the oleg. The timi shush the lelia. The timi craft the oleg. The timi craft the melva. The lelia sportscast the oleg. The lelia sportscast the melva. The lelia is ongoing. The lelia is imbricated. The melva is unveiled. The melva shush the lelia. The melva craft the timi. The melva craft the lelia. If someone craft the timi and the timi is ongoing then they are imbricated. If someone shush the lelia then they eat the timi. If someone is ongoing then they see the lelia. If the lelia craft the melva and the lelia is accidental then the melva craft the lelia. If the melva sportscast the timi then the timi is amblyopic. If someone sportscast the oleg and they eat the timi then the oleg shush the melva. If someone is accidental then they visit the lelia. If the melva sportscast the lelia and the melva is accidental then the melva craft the timi. The oleg does not visit the lelia.", "logic": "\nUnveiled(oleg)\nUnveiled(timi)\nOngoing(timi)\nShush(timi, oleg)\nShush(timi, lelia)\nCraft(timi, oleg)\nCraft(timi, melva)\nSportscast(lelia, oleg)\nSportscast(lelia, melva)\nOngoing(lelia)\nImbricated(lelia)\nUnveiled(melva)\nShush(melva, lelia)\nCraft(melva, timi)\nCraft(melva, lelia)\nforall x (Craft(x, timi) and Ongoing(timi) -> Imbricated(x))\nforall x (Shush(x, lelia) -> Sportscast(x, timi))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Shush(x, lelia))\nCraft(lelia, melva) and Accidental(lelia) -> Craft(melva, lelia)\nSportscast(melva, timi) -> Amblyopic(timi)\nforall x (Sportscast(x, oleg) and Sportscast(x, timi) -> Shush(oleg, melva))\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Craft(x, lelia))\nSportscast(melva, lelia) and Accidental(melva) -> Craft(melva, timi)\n\nnot Craft(oleg, lelia)\n\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Craft(x, lelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The marve is split. The maureen is split. The maureen is dismissed. The maureen yell the marve. The maureen yell the harwell. The maureen catnap the marve. The maureen catnap the barnard. The harwell gripe the marve. The harwell gripe the barnard. The harwell is dismissed. The harwell is alleged. The barnard is split. The barnard yell the harwell. The barnard catnap the maureen. The barnard catnap the harwell. If someone catnap the maureen and the maureen is dismissed then they are alleged. If someone yell the harwell then they eat the maureen. If someone is dismissed then they see the harwell. If the harwell catnap the barnard and the harwell is upstairs then the barnard catnap the harwell. If the barnard gripe the maureen then the maureen is muciferous. If someone gripe the marve and they eat the maureen then the marve yell the barnard. If someone is upstairs then they visit the harwell. If the barnard gripe the harwell and the barnard is upstairs then the barnard catnap the maureen. The harwell catnap the maureen.", "logic": "\nSplit(marve)\nSplit(maureen)\nDismissed(maureen)\nYell(maureen, marve)\nYell(maureen, harwell)\nCatnap(maureen, marve)\nCatnap(maureen, barnard)\nGripe(harwell, marve)\nGripe(harwell, barnard)\nDismissed(harwell)\nAlleged(harwell)\nSplit(barnard)\nYell(barnard, harwell)\nCatnap(barnard, maureen)\nCatnap(barnard, harwell)\nforall x (Catnap(x, maureen) and Dismissed(maureen) -> Alleged(x))\nforall x (Yell(x, harwell) -> Gripe(x, maureen))\nforall x (Dismissed(x) -> Yell(x, harwell))\nCatnap(harwell, barnard) and Upstairs(harwell) -> Catnap(barnard, harwell)\nGripe(barnard, maureen) -> Muciferous(maureen)\nforall x (Gripe(x, marve) and Gripe(x, maureen) -> Yell(marve, barnard))\nforall x (Upstairs(x) -> Catnap(x, harwell))\nGripe(barnard, harwell) and Upstairs(barnard) -> Catnap(barnard, maureen)\n\nCatnap(harwell, maureen)\n\nCatnap(harwell, maureen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The paulita is procumbent. The frankie is procumbent. The frankie is unsold. The frankie repress the paulita. The frankie repress the britta. The frankie commune the paulita. The frankie commune the jeane. The britta quarantine the paulita. The britta quarantine the jeane. The britta is unsold. The britta is granulose. The jeane is procumbent. The jeane repress the britta. The jeane commune the frankie. The jeane commune the britta. If someone commune the frankie and the frankie is unsold then they are granulose. If someone repress the britta then they eat the frankie. If someone is unsold then they see the britta. If the britta commune the jeane and the britta is slav then the jeane commune the britta. If the jeane quarantine the frankie then the frankie is disordered. If someone quarantine the paulita and they eat the frankie then the paulita repress the jeane. If someone is slav then they visit the britta. If the jeane quarantine the britta and the jeane is slav then the jeane commune the frankie. The britta does not see the paulita.", "logic": "\nProcumbent(paulita)\nProcumbent(frankie)\nUnsold(frankie)\nRepress(frankie, paulita)\nRepress(frankie, britta)\nCommune(frankie, paulita)\nCommune(frankie, jeane)\nQuarantine(britta, paulita)\nQuarantine(britta, jeane)\nUnsold(britta)\nGranulose(britta)\nProcumbent(jeane)\nRepress(jeane, britta)\nCommune(jeane, frankie)\nCommune(jeane, britta)\nforall x (Commune(x, frankie) and Unsold(frankie) -> Granulose(x))\nforall x (Repress(x, britta) -> Quarantine(x, frankie))\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Repress(x, britta))\nCommune(britta, jeane) and Slav(britta) -> Commune(jeane, britta)\nQuarantine(jeane, frankie) -> Disordered(frankie)\nforall x (Quarantine(x, paulita) and Quarantine(x, frankie) -> Repress(paulita, jeane))\nforall x (Slav(x) -> Commune(x, britta))\nQuarantine(jeane, britta) and Slav(jeane) -> Commune(jeane, frankie)\n\nnot Repress(britta, paulita)\n\nnot Repress(britta, paulita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The marco is forfeited. The bryan is forfeited. The bryan is stifled. The bryan complete the marco. The bryan complete the aida. The bryan tickle the marco. The bryan tickle the traver. The aida outgo the marco. The aida outgo the traver. The aida is stifled. The aida is cypriote. The traver is forfeited. The traver complete the aida. The traver tickle the bryan. The traver tickle the aida. If someone tickle the bryan and the bryan is stifled then they are cypriote. If someone complete the aida then they eat the bryan. If someone is stifled then they see the aida. If the aida tickle the traver and the aida is harmonious then the traver tickle the aida. If the traver outgo the bryan then the bryan is caliginous. If someone outgo the marco and they eat the bryan then the marco complete the traver. If someone is harmonious then they visit the aida. If the traver outgo the aida and the traver is harmonious then the traver tickle the bryan. The bryan outgo the traver.", "logic": "\nForfeited(marco)\nForfeited(bryan)\nStifled(bryan)\nComplete(bryan, marco)\nComplete(bryan, aida)\nTickle(bryan, marco)\nTickle(bryan, traver)\nOutgo(aida, marco)\nOutgo(aida, traver)\nStifled(aida)\nCypriote(aida)\nForfeited(traver)\nComplete(traver, aida)\nTickle(traver, bryan)\nTickle(traver, aida)\nforall x (Tickle(x, bryan) and Stifled(bryan) -> Cypriote(x))\nforall x (Complete(x, aida) -> Outgo(x, bryan))\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Complete(x, aida))\nTickle(aida, traver) and Harmonious(aida) -> Tickle(traver, aida)\nOutgo(traver, bryan) -> Caliginous(bryan)\nforall x (Outgo(x, marco) and Outgo(x, bryan) -> Complete(marco, traver))\nforall x (Harmonious(x) -> Tickle(x, aida))\nOutgo(traver, aida) and Harmonious(traver) -> Tickle(traver, bryan)\n\nOutgo(bryan, traver)\n\nOutgo(bryan, traver) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Goddard is swanky. Goddard is better. Goddard is small. Goddard is abandoned. Goddard is deterrent. Goddard is dominant. Goddard is economical. Brigitta is swanky. Brigitta is better. Brigitta is small. Brigitta is abandoned. Brigitta is deterrent. Big, dominant people are abandoned. Nice, swanky people are economical. If someone is swanky and economical then they are dominant. All dominant, deterrent people are better. All deterrent, abandoned people are swanky. If someone is economical and abandoned then they are better. Blue, abandoned people are small. If someone is better then they are abandoned. Goddard is better.", "logic": "\nSwanky(goddard)\nBetter(goddard)\nSmall(goddard)\nAbandoned(goddard)\nDeterrent(goddard)\nDominant(goddard)\nEconomical(goddard)\nSwanky(brigitta)\nBetter(brigitta)\nSmall(brigitta)\nAbandoned(brigitta)\nDeterrent(brigitta)\nforall x (Swanky(x) and Dominant(x) -> Abandoned(x))\nforall x (Abandoned(x) and Swanky(x) -> Economical(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) and Economical(x) -> Dominant(x))\nforall x (Dominant(x) and Deterrent(x) -> Better(x))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and Abandoned(x) -> Swanky(x))\nforall x (Economical(x) and Abandoned(x) -> Better(x))\nforall x (Better(x) and Abandoned(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Better(x) -> Abandoned(x))\n\nBetter(goddard)\n\ntherefore Better(goddard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-763"} {"premises": "Kaari is vagrant. Kaari is amnic. Kaari is britannic. Kaari is freehand. Kaari is unstrained. Kaari is gruelling. Kaari is adverbial. Jinny is vagrant. Jinny is amnic. Jinny is britannic. Jinny is freehand. Jinny is unstrained. Big, gruelling people are freehand. Nice, vagrant people are adverbial. If someone is vagrant and adverbial then they are gruelling. All gruelling, unstrained people are amnic. All unstrained, freehand people are vagrant. If someone is adverbial and freehand then they are amnic. Blue, freehand people are britannic. If someone is amnic then they are freehand. Kaari is not gruelling.", "logic": "\nVagrant(kaari)\nAmnic(kaari)\nBritannic(kaari)\nFreehand(kaari)\nUnstrained(kaari)\nGruelling(kaari)\nAdverbial(kaari)\nVagrant(jinny)\nAmnic(jinny)\nBritannic(jinny)\nFreehand(jinny)\nUnstrained(jinny)\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and Gruelling(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Freehand(x) and Vagrant(x) -> Adverbial(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and Adverbial(x) -> Gruelling(x))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and Unstrained(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Unstrained(x) and Freehand(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Adverbial(x) and Freehand(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Amnic(x) and Freehand(x) -> Britannic(x))\nforall x (Amnic(x) -> Freehand(x))\n\nnot Gruelling(kaari)\n\ntherefore Gruelling(kaari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-763"} {"premises": "Corinna is pleasant. Corinna is roofed. Corinna is glassy. Corinna is genuine. Corinna is bismuthic. Corinna is utilizable. Corinna is untufted. Malcolm is pleasant. Malcolm is roofed. Malcolm is glassy. Malcolm is genuine. Malcolm is bismuthic. Big, utilizable people are genuine. Nice, pleasant people are untufted. If someone is pleasant and untufted then they are utilizable. All utilizable, bismuthic people are roofed. All bismuthic, genuine people are pleasant. If someone is untufted and genuine then they are roofed. Blue, genuine people are glassy. If someone is roofed then they are genuine. Malcolm is untufted.", "logic": "\nPleasant(corinna)\nRoofed(corinna)\nGlassy(corinna)\nGenuine(corinna)\nBismuthic(corinna)\nUtilizable(corinna)\nUntufted(corinna)\nPleasant(malcolm)\nRoofed(malcolm)\nGlassy(malcolm)\nGenuine(malcolm)\nBismuthic(malcolm)\nforall x (Pleasant(x) and Utilizable(x) -> Genuine(x))\nforall x (Genuine(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Untufted(x))\nforall x (Pleasant(x) and Untufted(x) -> Utilizable(x))\nforall x (Utilizable(x) and Bismuthic(x) -> Roofed(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) and Genuine(x) -> Pleasant(x))\nforall x (Untufted(x) and Genuine(x) -> Roofed(x))\nforall x (Roofed(x) and Genuine(x) -> Glassy(x))\nforall x (Roofed(x) -> Genuine(x))\n\nUntufted(malcolm)\n\nGenuine(malcolm) and Pleasant(malcolm) and forall x (Genuine(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Untufted(x)) -> therefore Untufted(malcolm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-763"} {"premises": "Odille is libelous. Odille is spurting. Odille is flooded. Odille is vedic. Odille is gutsy. Odille is inanimate. Odille is decided. Coralyn is libelous. Coralyn is spurting. Coralyn is flooded. Coralyn is vedic. Coralyn is gutsy. Big, inanimate people are vedic. Nice, libelous people are decided. If someone is libelous and decided then they are inanimate. All inanimate, gutsy people are spurting. All gutsy, vedic people are libelous. If someone is decided and vedic then they are spurting. Blue, vedic people are flooded. If someone is spurting then they are vedic. Coralyn is not decided.", "logic": "\nLibelous(odille)\nSpurting(odille)\nFlooded(odille)\nVedic(odille)\nGutsy(odille)\nInanimate(odille)\nDecided(odille)\nLibelous(coralyn)\nSpurting(coralyn)\nFlooded(coralyn)\nVedic(coralyn)\nGutsy(coralyn)\nforall x (Libelous(x) and Inanimate(x) -> Vedic(x))\nforall x (Vedic(x) and Libelous(x) -> Decided(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) and Decided(x) -> Inanimate(x))\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Gutsy(x) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Gutsy(x) and Vedic(x) -> Libelous(x))\nforall x (Decided(x) and Vedic(x) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) and Vedic(x) -> Flooded(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Vedic(x))\n\nnot Decided(coralyn)\n\nVedic(coralyn) and Libelous(coralyn) and forall x (Vedic(x) and Libelous(x) -> Decided(x)) -> therefore Decided(coralyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-763"} {"premises": "Gladis is praetorian. Gladis is polyploid. Gladis is flamboyant. Gladis is immoveable. Gladis is franciscan. Gladis is flashy. Gladis is anosmic. Missie is praetorian. Missie is polyploid. Missie is flamboyant. Missie is immoveable. Missie is franciscan. Big, flashy people are immoveable. Nice, praetorian people are anosmic. If someone is praetorian and anosmic then they are flashy. All flashy, franciscan people are polyploid. All franciscan, immoveable people are praetorian. If someone is anosmic and immoveable then they are polyploid. Blue, immoveable people are flamboyant. If someone is polyploid then they are immoveable. Missie is flashy.", "logic": "\nPraetorian(gladis)\nPolyploid(gladis)\nFlamboyant(gladis)\nImmoveable(gladis)\nFranciscan(gladis)\nFlashy(gladis)\nAnosmic(gladis)\nPraetorian(missie)\nPolyploid(missie)\nFlamboyant(missie)\nImmoveable(missie)\nFranciscan(missie)\nforall x (Praetorian(x) and Flashy(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Immoveable(x) and Praetorian(x) -> Anosmic(x))\nforall x (Praetorian(x) and Anosmic(x) -> Flashy(x))\nforall x (Flashy(x) and Franciscan(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) and Immoveable(x) -> Praetorian(x))\nforall x (Anosmic(x) and Immoveable(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Polyploid(x) and Immoveable(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\nforall x (Polyploid(x) -> Immoveable(x))\n\nFlashy(missie)\n\nImmoveable(missie) and Praetorian(missie) and forall x (Immoveable(x) and Praetorian(x) -> Anosmic(x)) -> therefore Anosmic(missie) Praetorian(missie) and Anosmic(missie) and forall x (Praetorian(x) and Anosmic(x) -> Flashy(x)) -> therefore Flashy(missie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-763"} {"premises": "Damaris is acuate. Damaris is meager. Damaris is salubrious. Damaris is salvific. Damaris is lubricious. Damaris is russian. Damaris is mined. Bev is acuate. Bev is meager. Bev is salubrious. Bev is salvific. Bev is lubricious. Big, russian people are salvific. Nice, acuate people are mined. If someone is acuate and mined then they are russian. All russian, lubricious people are meager. All lubricious, salvific people are acuate. If someone is mined and salvific then they are meager. Blue, salvific people are salubrious. If someone is meager then they are salvific. Bev is not russian.", "logic": "\nAcuate(damaris)\nMeager(damaris)\nSalubrious(damaris)\nSalvific(damaris)\nLubricious(damaris)\nRussian(damaris)\nMined(damaris)\nAcuate(bev)\nMeager(bev)\nSalubrious(bev)\nSalvific(bev)\nLubricious(bev)\nforall x (Acuate(x) and Russian(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Salvific(x) and Acuate(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Acuate(x) and Mined(x) -> Russian(x))\nforall x (Russian(x) and Lubricious(x) -> Meager(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Salvific(x) -> Acuate(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) and Salvific(x) -> Meager(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) and Salvific(x) -> Salubrious(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) -> Salvific(x))\n\nnot Russian(bev)\n\nSalvific(bev) and Acuate(bev) and forall x (Salvific(x) and Acuate(x) -> Mined(x)) -> therefore Mined(bev) Acuate(bev) and Mined(bev) and forall x (Acuate(x) and Mined(x) -> Russian(x)) -> therefore Russian(bev)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-763"} {"premises": "The oleg dismiss the shanie. The oleg effeminise the josselyn. The shanie dismiss the oleg. The shanie dismiss the kipp. The shanie radiate the kipp. The shanie is depressing. The shanie effeminise the oleg. The shanie effeminise the josselyn. The kipp dismiss the shanie. The kipp does not eat the shanie. The kipp effeminise the shanie. The josselyn does not chase the oleg. The josselyn radiate the kipp. The josselyn is preeminent. The josselyn effeminise the oleg. If something radiate the josselyn and the josselyn radiate the shanie then the shanie does not eat the josselyn. If something effeminise the shanie then the shanie dismiss the oleg. If something radiate the josselyn then the josselyn radiate the shanie. If something is chuffed and it dismiss the kipp then the kipp radiate the josselyn. If something dismiss the kipp then the kipp radiate the josselyn. If something radiate the josselyn and the josselyn radiate the oleg then the oleg is salty. The oleg dismiss the shanie.", "logic": "\nDismiss(oleg, shanie)\nEffeminise(oleg, josselyn)\nDismiss(shanie, oleg)\nDismiss(shanie, kipp)\nRadiate(shanie, kipp)\nDepressing(shanie)\nEffeminise(shanie, oleg)\nEffeminise(shanie, josselyn)\nDismiss(kipp, shanie)\nnot Radiate(kipp, shanie)\nEffeminise(kipp, shanie)\nnot Dismiss(josselyn, oleg)\nRadiate(josselyn, kipp)\nPreeminent(josselyn)\nEffeminise(josselyn, oleg)\nforall x (Radiate(x, josselyn) and Radiate(josselyn, shanie) -> not Radiate(shanie, josselyn))\nforall x (Effeminise(x, shanie) -> Dismiss(shanie, oleg))\nforall x (Radiate(x, josselyn) -> Radiate(josselyn, shanie))\nforall x (Chuffed(x) and Dismiss(x, kipp) -> Radiate(kipp, josselyn))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, kipp) -> Radiate(kipp, josselyn))\nforall x (Radiate(x, josselyn) and Radiate(josselyn, oleg) -> Salty(oleg))\n\nDismiss(oleg, shanie)\n\ntherefore Dismiss(oleg, shanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The alane palpate the herrick. The alane ginger the france. The herrick palpate the alane. The herrick palpate the roderigo. The herrick reignite the roderigo. The herrick is upcoming. The herrick ginger the alane. The herrick ginger the france. The roderigo palpate the herrick. The roderigo does not eat the herrick. The roderigo ginger the herrick. The france does not chase the alane. The france reignite the roderigo. The france is resounding. The france ginger the alane. If something reignite the france and the france reignite the herrick then the herrick does not eat the france. If something ginger the herrick then the herrick palpate the alane. If something reignite the france then the france reignite the herrick. If something is unpowered and it palpate the roderigo then the roderigo reignite the france. If something palpate the roderigo then the roderigo reignite the france. If something reignite the france and the france reignite the alane then the alane is formidable. The herrick does not chase the roderigo.", "logic": "\nPalpate(alane, herrick)\nGinger(alane, france)\nPalpate(herrick, alane)\nPalpate(herrick, roderigo)\nReignite(herrick, roderigo)\nUpcoming(herrick)\nGinger(herrick, alane)\nGinger(herrick, france)\nPalpate(roderigo, herrick)\nnot Reignite(roderigo, herrick)\nGinger(roderigo, herrick)\nnot Palpate(france, alane)\nReignite(france, roderigo)\nResounding(france)\nGinger(france, alane)\nforall x (Reignite(x, france) and Reignite(france, herrick) -> not Reignite(herrick, france))\nforall x (Ginger(x, herrick) -> Palpate(herrick, alane))\nforall x (Reignite(x, france) -> Reignite(france, herrick))\nforall x (Unpowered(x) and Palpate(x, roderigo) -> Reignite(roderigo, france))\nforall x (Palpate(x, roderigo) -> Reignite(roderigo, france))\nforall x (Reignite(x, france) and Reignite(france, alane) -> Formidable(alane))\n\nnot Palpate(herrick, roderigo)\n\ntherefore Palpate(herrick, roderigo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The margie contribute the deryl. The margie miscall the ephram. The deryl contribute the margie. The deryl contribute the waine. The deryl stir the waine. The deryl is gauntleted. The deryl miscall the margie. The deryl miscall the ephram. The waine contribute the deryl. The waine does not eat the deryl. The waine miscall the deryl. The ephram does not chase the margie. The ephram stir the waine. The ephram is morose. The ephram miscall the margie. If something stir the ephram and the ephram stir the deryl then the deryl does not eat the ephram. If something miscall the deryl then the deryl contribute the margie. If something stir the ephram then the ephram stir the deryl. If something is oriented and it contribute the waine then the waine stir the ephram. If something contribute the waine then the waine stir the ephram. If something stir the ephram and the ephram stir the margie then the margie is worthless. The waine stir the ephram.", "logic": "\nContribute(margie, deryl)\nMiscall(margie, ephram)\nContribute(deryl, margie)\nContribute(deryl, waine)\nStir(deryl, waine)\nGauntleted(deryl)\nMiscall(deryl, margie)\nMiscall(deryl, ephram)\nContribute(waine, deryl)\nnot Stir(waine, deryl)\nMiscall(waine, deryl)\nnot Contribute(ephram, margie)\nStir(ephram, waine)\nMorose(ephram)\nMiscall(ephram, margie)\nforall x (Stir(x, ephram) and Stir(ephram, deryl) -> not Stir(deryl, ephram))\nforall x (Miscall(x, deryl) -> Contribute(deryl, margie))\nforall x (Stir(x, ephram) -> Stir(ephram, deryl))\nforall x (Oriented(x) and Contribute(x, waine) -> Stir(waine, ephram))\nforall x (Contribute(x, waine) -> Stir(waine, ephram))\nforall x (Stir(x, ephram) and Stir(ephram, margie) -> Worthless(margie))\n\nStir(waine, ephram)\n\nContribute(deryl, waine) and forall x (Contribute(x, waine) -> Stir(waine, ephram)) -> therefore Stir(waine, ephram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The grissel sorcerise the barbara. The grissel embower the stepha. The barbara sorcerise the grissel. The barbara sorcerise the steward. The barbara skirl the steward. The barbara is obstinate. The barbara embower the grissel. The barbara embower the stepha. The steward sorcerise the barbara. The steward does not eat the barbara. The steward embower the barbara. The stepha does not chase the grissel. The stepha skirl the steward. The stepha is comparable. The stepha embower the grissel. If something skirl the stepha and the stepha skirl the barbara then the barbara does not eat the stepha. If something embower the barbara then the barbara sorcerise the grissel. If something skirl the stepha then the stepha skirl the barbara. If something is inborn and it sorcerise the steward then the steward skirl the stepha. If something sorcerise the steward then the steward skirl the stepha. If something skirl the stepha and the stepha skirl the grissel then the grissel is compliant. The steward does not eat the stepha.", "logic": "\nSorcerise(grissel, barbara)\nEmbower(grissel, stepha)\nSorcerise(barbara, grissel)\nSorcerise(barbara, steward)\nSkirl(barbara, steward)\nObstinate(barbara)\nEmbower(barbara, grissel)\nEmbower(barbara, stepha)\nSorcerise(steward, barbara)\nnot Skirl(steward, barbara)\nEmbower(steward, barbara)\nnot Sorcerise(stepha, grissel)\nSkirl(stepha, steward)\nComparable(stepha)\nEmbower(stepha, grissel)\nforall x (Skirl(x, stepha) and Skirl(stepha, barbara) -> not Skirl(barbara, stepha))\nforall x (Embower(x, barbara) -> Sorcerise(barbara, grissel))\nforall x (Skirl(x, stepha) -> Skirl(stepha, barbara))\nforall x (Inborn(x) and Sorcerise(x, steward) -> Skirl(steward, stepha))\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, steward) -> Skirl(steward, stepha))\nforall x (Skirl(x, stepha) and Skirl(stepha, grissel) -> Compliant(grissel))\n\nnot Skirl(steward, stepha)\n\nSorcerise(barbara, steward) and forall x (Sorcerise(x, steward) -> Skirl(steward, stepha)) -> therefore Skirl(steward, stepha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The elvis spite the penelopa. The elvis mythicize the pascale. The penelopa spite the elvis. The penelopa spite the vance. The penelopa bodge the vance. The penelopa is jingly. The penelopa mythicize the elvis. The penelopa mythicize the pascale. The vance spite the penelopa. The vance does not eat the penelopa. The vance mythicize the penelopa. The pascale does not chase the elvis. The pascale bodge the vance. The pascale is meridian. The pascale mythicize the elvis. If something bodge the pascale and the pascale bodge the penelopa then the penelopa does not eat the pascale. If something mythicize the penelopa then the penelopa spite the elvis. If something bodge the pascale then the pascale bodge the penelopa. If something is blunt and it spite the vance then the vance bodge the pascale. If something spite the vance then the vance bodge the pascale. If something bodge the pascale and the pascale bodge the elvis then the elvis is siliceous. The pascale bodge the penelopa.", "logic": "\nSpite(elvis, penelopa)\nMythicize(elvis, pascale)\nSpite(penelopa, elvis)\nSpite(penelopa, vance)\nBodge(penelopa, vance)\nJingly(penelopa)\nMythicize(penelopa, elvis)\nMythicize(penelopa, pascale)\nSpite(vance, penelopa)\nnot Bodge(vance, penelopa)\nMythicize(vance, penelopa)\nnot Spite(pascale, elvis)\nBodge(pascale, vance)\nMeridian(pascale)\nMythicize(pascale, elvis)\nforall x (Bodge(x, pascale) and Bodge(pascale, penelopa) -> not Bodge(penelopa, pascale))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, penelopa) -> Spite(penelopa, elvis))\nforall x (Bodge(x, pascale) -> Bodge(pascale, penelopa))\nforall x (Blunt(x) and Spite(x, vance) -> Bodge(vance, pascale))\nforall x (Spite(x, vance) -> Bodge(vance, pascale))\nforall x (Bodge(x, pascale) and Bodge(pascale, elvis) -> Siliceous(elvis))\n\nBodge(pascale, penelopa)\n\nSpite(penelopa, vance) and forall x (Spite(x, vance) -> Bodge(vance, pascale)) -> therefore Bodge(vance, pascale) Bodge(vance, pascale) and forall x (Bodge(x, pascale) -> Bodge(pascale, penelopa)) -> therefore Bodge(pascale, penelopa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The meir grout the darren. The meir chevy the colette. The darren grout the meir. The darren grout the conney. The darren repeat the conney. The darren is atactic. The darren chevy the meir. The darren chevy the colette. The conney grout the darren. The conney does not eat the darren. The conney chevy the darren. The colette does not chase the meir. The colette repeat the conney. The colette is aortal. The colette chevy the meir. If something repeat the colette and the colette repeat the darren then the darren does not eat the colette. If something chevy the darren then the darren grout the meir. If something repeat the colette then the colette repeat the darren. If something is acapnotic and it grout the conney then the conney repeat the colette. If something grout the conney then the conney repeat the colette. If something repeat the colette and the colette repeat the meir then the meir is biconcave. The colette does not eat the darren.", "logic": "\nGrout(meir, darren)\nChevy(meir, colette)\nGrout(darren, meir)\nGrout(darren, conney)\nRepeat(darren, conney)\nAtactic(darren)\nChevy(darren, meir)\nChevy(darren, colette)\nGrout(conney, darren)\nnot Repeat(conney, darren)\nChevy(conney, darren)\nnot Grout(colette, meir)\nRepeat(colette, conney)\nAortal(colette)\nChevy(colette, meir)\nforall x (Repeat(x, colette) and Repeat(colette, darren) -> not Repeat(darren, colette))\nforall x (Chevy(x, darren) -> Grout(darren, meir))\nforall x (Repeat(x, colette) -> Repeat(colette, darren))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) and Grout(x, conney) -> Repeat(conney, colette))\nforall x (Grout(x, conney) -> Repeat(conney, colette))\nforall x (Repeat(x, colette) and Repeat(colette, meir) -> Biconcave(meir))\n\nnot Repeat(colette, darren)\n\nGrout(darren, conney) and forall x (Grout(x, conney) -> Repeat(conney, colette)) -> therefore Repeat(conney, colette) Repeat(conney, colette) and forall x (Repeat(x, colette) -> Repeat(colette, darren)) -> therefore Repeat(colette, darren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The winny surpass the nora. The winny calibrate the reinhold. The nora surpass the winny. The nora surpass the markos. The nora upheave the markos. The nora is gelid. The nora calibrate the winny. The nora calibrate the reinhold. The markos surpass the nora. The markos does not eat the nora. The markos calibrate the nora. The reinhold does not chase the winny. The reinhold upheave the markos. The reinhold is agonising. The reinhold calibrate the winny. If something upheave the reinhold and the reinhold upheave the nora then the nora does not eat the reinhold. If something calibrate the nora then the nora surpass the winny. If something upheave the reinhold then the reinhold upheave the nora. If something is unsporting and it surpass the markos then the markos upheave the reinhold. If something surpass the markos then the markos upheave the reinhold. If something upheave the reinhold and the reinhold upheave the winny then the winny is quiescent. The winny is not quiescent.", "logic": "\nSurpass(winny, nora)\nCalibrate(winny, reinhold)\nSurpass(nora, winny)\nSurpass(nora, markos)\nUpheave(nora, markos)\nGelid(nora)\nCalibrate(nora, winny)\nCalibrate(nora, reinhold)\nSurpass(markos, nora)\nnot Upheave(markos, nora)\nCalibrate(markos, nora)\nnot Surpass(reinhold, winny)\nUpheave(reinhold, markos)\nAgonising(reinhold)\nCalibrate(reinhold, winny)\nforall x (Upheave(x, reinhold) and Upheave(reinhold, nora) -> not Upheave(nora, reinhold))\nforall x (Calibrate(x, nora) -> Surpass(nora, winny))\nforall x (Upheave(x, reinhold) -> Upheave(reinhold, nora))\nforall x (Unsporting(x) and Surpass(x, markos) -> Upheave(markos, reinhold))\nforall x (Surpass(x, markos) -> Upheave(markos, reinhold))\nforall x (Upheave(x, reinhold) and Upheave(reinhold, winny) -> Quiescent(winny))\n\nnot Quiescent(winny)\n\nforall x (Upheave(x, reinhold) and Upheave(reinhold, winny) -> Quiescent(winny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The alton tighten the maribel. The alton repose the wayne. The maribel tighten the alton. The maribel tighten the kimball. The maribel feud the kimball. The maribel is undefended. The maribel repose the alton. The maribel repose the wayne. The kimball tighten the maribel. The kimball does not eat the maribel. The kimball repose the maribel. The wayne does not chase the alton. The wayne feud the kimball. The wayne is acheronian. The wayne repose the alton. If something feud the wayne and the wayne feud the maribel then the maribel does not eat the wayne. If something repose the maribel then the maribel tighten the alton. If something feud the wayne then the wayne feud the maribel. If something is omani and it tighten the kimball then the kimball feud the wayne. If something tighten the kimball then the kimball feud the wayne. If something feud the wayne and the wayne feud the alton then the alton is unfathomed. The alton repose the alton.", "logic": "\nTighten(alton, maribel)\nRepose(alton, wayne)\nTighten(maribel, alton)\nTighten(maribel, kimball)\nFeud(maribel, kimball)\nUndefended(maribel)\nRepose(maribel, alton)\nRepose(maribel, wayne)\nTighten(kimball, maribel)\nnot Feud(kimball, maribel)\nRepose(kimball, maribel)\nnot Tighten(wayne, alton)\nFeud(wayne, kimball)\nAcheronian(wayne)\nRepose(wayne, alton)\nforall x (Feud(x, wayne) and Feud(wayne, maribel) -> not Feud(maribel, wayne))\nforall x (Repose(x, maribel) -> Tighten(maribel, alton))\nforall x (Feud(x, wayne) -> Feud(wayne, maribel))\nforall x (Omani(x) and Tighten(x, kimball) -> Feud(kimball, wayne))\nforall x (Tighten(x, kimball) -> Feud(kimball, wayne))\nforall x (Feud(x, wayne) and Feud(wayne, alton) -> Unfathomed(alton))\n\nRepose(alton, alton)\n\nRepose(alton, alton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The kay avouch the emelda. The kay brocade the joelie. The emelda avouch the kay. The emelda avouch the nate. The emelda refuel the nate. The emelda is virtuoso. The emelda brocade the kay. The emelda brocade the joelie. The nate avouch the emelda. The nate does not eat the emelda. The nate brocade the emelda. The joelie does not chase the kay. The joelie refuel the nate. The joelie is infernal. The joelie brocade the kay. If something refuel the joelie and the joelie refuel the emelda then the emelda does not eat the joelie. If something brocade the emelda then the emelda avouch the kay. If something refuel the joelie then the joelie refuel the emelda. If something is insightful and it avouch the nate then the nate refuel the joelie. If something avouch the nate then the nate refuel the joelie. If something refuel the joelie and the joelie refuel the kay then the kay is scraggly. The kay does not eat the nate.", "logic": "\nAvouch(kay, emelda)\nBrocade(kay, joelie)\nAvouch(emelda, kay)\nAvouch(emelda, nate)\nRefuel(emelda, nate)\nVirtuoso(emelda)\nBrocade(emelda, kay)\nBrocade(emelda, joelie)\nAvouch(nate, emelda)\nnot Refuel(nate, emelda)\nBrocade(nate, emelda)\nnot Avouch(joelie, kay)\nRefuel(joelie, nate)\nInfernal(joelie)\nBrocade(joelie, kay)\nforall x (Refuel(x, joelie) and Refuel(joelie, emelda) -> not Refuel(emelda, joelie))\nforall x (Brocade(x, emelda) -> Avouch(emelda, kay))\nforall x (Refuel(x, joelie) -> Refuel(joelie, emelda))\nforall x (Insightful(x) and Avouch(x, nate) -> Refuel(nate, joelie))\nforall x (Avouch(x, nate) -> Refuel(nate, joelie))\nforall x (Refuel(x, joelie) and Refuel(joelie, kay) -> Scraggly(kay))\n\nnot Refuel(kay, nate)\n\nnot Refuel(kay, nate) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The austina overfeed the tessa. The austina confection the kass. The tessa overfeed the austina. The tessa overfeed the zak. The tessa preform the zak. The tessa is oviparous. The tessa confection the austina. The tessa confection the kass. The zak overfeed the tessa. The zak does not eat the tessa. The zak confection the tessa. The kass does not chase the austina. The kass preform the zak. The kass is incapable. The kass confection the austina. If something preform the kass and the kass preform the tessa then the tessa does not eat the kass. If something confection the tessa then the tessa overfeed the austina. If something preform the kass then the kass preform the tessa. If something is basipetal and it overfeed the zak then the zak preform the kass. If something overfeed the zak then the zak preform the kass. If something preform the kass and the kass preform the austina then the austina is impeccant. The kass is blue.", "logic": "\nOverfeed(austina, tessa)\nConfection(austina, kass)\nOverfeed(tessa, austina)\nOverfeed(tessa, zak)\nPreform(tessa, zak)\nOviparous(tessa)\nConfection(tessa, austina)\nConfection(tessa, kass)\nOverfeed(zak, tessa)\nnot Preform(zak, tessa)\nConfection(zak, tessa)\nnot Overfeed(kass, austina)\nPreform(kass, zak)\nIncapable(kass)\nConfection(kass, austina)\nforall x (Preform(x, kass) and Preform(kass, tessa) -> not Preform(tessa, kass))\nforall x (Confection(x, tessa) -> Overfeed(tessa, austina))\nforall x (Preform(x, kass) -> Preform(kass, tessa))\nforall x (Basipetal(x) and Overfeed(x, zak) -> Preform(zak, kass))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, zak) -> Preform(zak, kass))\nforall x (Preform(x, kass) and Preform(kass, austina) -> Impeccant(austina))\n\nBlue(kass)\n\nBlue(kass) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The odetta forgo the andrey. The odetta overdrive the elora. The andrey forgo the odetta. The andrey forgo the rozelle. The andrey stigmatise the rozelle. The andrey is auctorial. The andrey overdrive the odetta. The andrey overdrive the elora. The rozelle forgo the andrey. The rozelle does not eat the andrey. The rozelle overdrive the andrey. The elora does not chase the odetta. The elora stigmatise the rozelle. The elora is kooky. The elora overdrive the odetta. If something stigmatise the elora and the elora stigmatise the andrey then the andrey does not eat the elora. If something overdrive the andrey then the andrey forgo the odetta. If something stigmatise the elora then the elora stigmatise the andrey. If something is exothermic and it forgo the rozelle then the rozelle stigmatise the elora. If something forgo the rozelle then the rozelle stigmatise the elora. If something stigmatise the elora and the elora stigmatise the odetta then the odetta is expiratory. The odetta does not visit the rozelle.", "logic": "\nForgo(odetta, andrey)\nOverdrive(odetta, elora)\nForgo(andrey, odetta)\nForgo(andrey, rozelle)\nStigmatise(andrey, rozelle)\nAuctorial(andrey)\nOverdrive(andrey, odetta)\nOverdrive(andrey, elora)\nForgo(rozelle, andrey)\nnot Stigmatise(rozelle, andrey)\nOverdrive(rozelle, andrey)\nnot Forgo(elora, odetta)\nStigmatise(elora, rozelle)\nKooky(elora)\nOverdrive(elora, odetta)\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, elora) and Stigmatise(elora, andrey) -> not Stigmatise(andrey, elora))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, andrey) -> Forgo(andrey, odetta))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, elora) -> Stigmatise(elora, andrey))\nforall x (Exothermic(x) and Forgo(x, rozelle) -> Stigmatise(rozelle, elora))\nforall x (Forgo(x, rozelle) -> Stigmatise(rozelle, elora))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, elora) and Stigmatise(elora, odetta) -> Expiratory(odetta))\n\nnot Overdrive(odetta, rozelle)\n\nnot Overdrive(odetta, rozelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The matthus chaperone the suzie. The matthus lull the kaleena. The suzie chaperone the matthus. The suzie chaperone the brody. The suzie valet the brody. The suzie is conventual. The suzie lull the matthus. The suzie lull the kaleena. The brody chaperone the suzie. The brody does not eat the suzie. The brody lull the suzie. The kaleena does not chase the matthus. The kaleena valet the brody. The kaleena is unstinted. The kaleena lull the matthus. If something valet the kaleena and the kaleena valet the suzie then the suzie does not eat the kaleena. If something lull the suzie then the suzie chaperone the matthus. If something valet the kaleena then the kaleena valet the suzie. If something is aneroid and it chaperone the brody then the brody valet the kaleena. If something chaperone the brody then the brody valet the kaleena. If something valet the kaleena and the kaleena valet the matthus then the matthus is worthless. The brody lull the brody.", "logic": "\nChaperone(matthus, suzie)\nLull(matthus, kaleena)\nChaperone(suzie, matthus)\nChaperone(suzie, brody)\nValet(suzie, brody)\nConventual(suzie)\nLull(suzie, matthus)\nLull(suzie, kaleena)\nChaperone(brody, suzie)\nnot Valet(brody, suzie)\nLull(brody, suzie)\nnot Chaperone(kaleena, matthus)\nValet(kaleena, brody)\nUnstinted(kaleena)\nLull(kaleena, matthus)\nforall x (Valet(x, kaleena) and Valet(kaleena, suzie) -> not Valet(suzie, kaleena))\nforall x (Lull(x, suzie) -> Chaperone(suzie, matthus))\nforall x (Valet(x, kaleena) -> Valet(kaleena, suzie))\nforall x (Aneroid(x) and Chaperone(x, brody) -> Valet(brody, kaleena))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, brody) -> Valet(brody, kaleena))\nforall x (Valet(x, kaleena) and Valet(kaleena, matthus) -> Worthless(matthus))\n\nLull(brody, brody)\n\nLull(brody, brody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1573"} {"premises": "The oscar develop the theresita. The oscar develop the austen. The oscar canalise the austen. The oscar alleviate the theresita. The theresita develop the oscar. The theresita is cervical. The theresita is degressive. The theresita is czarist. The theresita canalise the oscar. The theresita alleviate the oscar. The austen develop the oscar. The austen develop the theresita. The austen is insightful. The austen canalise the oscar. The austen canalise the theresita. The austen alleviate the theresita. If someone develop the austen and the austen develop the oscar then the austen is cervical. If someone alleviate the oscar and they eat the theresita then the theresita is degressive. If someone is awkward then they need the oscar. All cervical people are degressive. If someone alleviate the theresita and the theresita is awkward then the theresita alleviate the austen. If someone alleviate the oscar then they are degressive. The theresita is czarist.", "logic": "\nDevelop(oscar, theresita)\nDevelop(oscar, austen)\nCanalise(oscar, austen)\nAlleviate(oscar, theresita)\nDevelop(theresita, oscar)\nCervical(theresita)\nDegressive(theresita)\nCzarist(theresita)\nCanalise(theresita, oscar)\nAlleviate(theresita, oscar)\nDevelop(austen, oscar)\nDevelop(austen, theresita)\nInsightful(austen)\nCanalise(austen, oscar)\nCanalise(austen, theresita)\nAlleviate(austen, theresita)\nforall x (Develop(x, austen) and Develop(austen, oscar) -> Cervical(austen))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, oscar) and Develop(x, theresita) -> Degressive(theresita))\nforall x (Awkward(x) -> Canalise(x, oscar))\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Degressive(x))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, theresita) and Awkward(theresita) -> Alleviate(theresita, austen))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, oscar) -> Degressive(x))\n\nCzarist(theresita)\n\ntherefore Czarist(theresita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The etty palatalise the wendall. The etty palatalise the pierette. The etty sidestep the pierette. The etty discomfit the wendall. The wendall palatalise the etty. The wendall is agonised. The wendall is poky. The wendall is vacuolate. The wendall sidestep the etty. The wendall discomfit the etty. The pierette palatalise the etty. The pierette palatalise the wendall. The pierette is baked. The pierette sidestep the etty. The pierette sidestep the wendall. The pierette discomfit the wendall. If someone palatalise the pierette and the pierette palatalise the etty then the pierette is agonised. If someone discomfit the etty and they eat the wendall then the wendall is poky. If someone is vinous then they need the etty. All agonised people are poky. If someone discomfit the wendall and the wendall is vinous then the wendall discomfit the pierette. If someone discomfit the etty then they are poky. The wendall is not agonised.", "logic": "\nPalatalise(etty, wendall)\nPalatalise(etty, pierette)\nSidestep(etty, pierette)\nDiscomfit(etty, wendall)\nPalatalise(wendall, etty)\nAgonised(wendall)\nPoky(wendall)\nVacuolate(wendall)\nSidestep(wendall, etty)\nDiscomfit(wendall, etty)\nPalatalise(pierette, etty)\nPalatalise(pierette, wendall)\nBaked(pierette)\nSidestep(pierette, etty)\nSidestep(pierette, wendall)\nDiscomfit(pierette, wendall)\nforall x (Palatalise(x, pierette) and Palatalise(pierette, etty) -> Agonised(pierette))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, etty) and Palatalise(x, wendall) -> Poky(wendall))\nforall x (Vinous(x) -> Sidestep(x, etty))\nforall x (Agonised(x) -> Poky(x))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, wendall) and Vinous(wendall) -> Discomfit(wendall, pierette))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, etty) -> Poky(x))\n\nnot Agonised(wendall)\n\ntherefore Agonised(wendall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The carey amnesty the matteo. The carey amnesty the nicolas. The carey parboil the nicolas. The carey overextend the matteo. The matteo amnesty the carey. The matteo is vestmented. The matteo is broadnosed. The matteo is xanthous. The matteo parboil the carey. The matteo overextend the carey. The nicolas amnesty the carey. The nicolas amnesty the matteo. The nicolas is epochal. The nicolas parboil the carey. The nicolas parboil the matteo. The nicolas overextend the matteo. If someone amnesty the nicolas and the nicolas amnesty the carey then the nicolas is vestmented. If someone overextend the carey and they eat the matteo then the matteo is broadnosed. If someone is clinched then they need the carey. All vestmented people are broadnosed. If someone overextend the matteo and the matteo is clinched then the matteo overextend the nicolas. If someone overextend the carey then they are broadnosed. The nicolas is vestmented.", "logic": "\nAmnesty(carey, matteo)\nAmnesty(carey, nicolas)\nParboil(carey, nicolas)\nOverextend(carey, matteo)\nAmnesty(matteo, carey)\nVestmented(matteo)\nBroadnosed(matteo)\nXanthous(matteo)\nParboil(matteo, carey)\nOverextend(matteo, carey)\nAmnesty(nicolas, carey)\nAmnesty(nicolas, matteo)\nEpochal(nicolas)\nParboil(nicolas, carey)\nParboil(nicolas, matteo)\nOverextend(nicolas, matteo)\nforall x (Amnesty(x, nicolas) and Amnesty(nicolas, carey) -> Vestmented(nicolas))\nforall x (Overextend(x, carey) and Amnesty(x, matteo) -> Broadnosed(matteo))\nforall x (Clinched(x) -> Parboil(x, carey))\nforall x (Vestmented(x) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Overextend(x, matteo) and Clinched(matteo) -> Overextend(matteo, nicolas))\nforall x (Overextend(x, carey) -> Broadnosed(x))\n\nVestmented(nicolas)\n\nAmnesty(carey, nicolas) and Amnesty(nicolas, carey) and forall x (Amnesty(x, nicolas) and Amnesty(nicolas, carey) -> Vestmented(nicolas)) -> therefore Vestmented(nicolas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The adoree withdraw the caitrin. The adoree withdraw the ingelbert. The adoree defog the ingelbert. The adoree perjure the caitrin. The caitrin withdraw the adoree. The caitrin is protracted. The caitrin is hourly. The caitrin is vestmented. The caitrin defog the adoree. The caitrin perjure the adoree. The ingelbert withdraw the adoree. The ingelbert withdraw the caitrin. The ingelbert is suspect. The ingelbert defog the adoree. The ingelbert defog the caitrin. The ingelbert perjure the caitrin. If someone withdraw the ingelbert and the ingelbert withdraw the adoree then the ingelbert is protracted. If someone perjure the adoree and they eat the caitrin then the caitrin is hourly. If someone is inexpert then they need the adoree. All protracted people are hourly. If someone perjure the caitrin and the caitrin is inexpert then the caitrin perjure the ingelbert. If someone perjure the adoree then they are hourly. The ingelbert is not protracted.", "logic": "\nWithdraw(adoree, caitrin)\nWithdraw(adoree, ingelbert)\nDefog(adoree, ingelbert)\nPerjure(adoree, caitrin)\nWithdraw(caitrin, adoree)\nProtracted(caitrin)\nHourly(caitrin)\nVestmented(caitrin)\nDefog(caitrin, adoree)\nPerjure(caitrin, adoree)\nWithdraw(ingelbert, adoree)\nWithdraw(ingelbert, caitrin)\nSuspect(ingelbert)\nDefog(ingelbert, adoree)\nDefog(ingelbert, caitrin)\nPerjure(ingelbert, caitrin)\nforall x (Withdraw(x, ingelbert) and Withdraw(ingelbert, adoree) -> Protracted(ingelbert))\nforall x (Perjure(x, adoree) and Withdraw(x, caitrin) -> Hourly(caitrin))\nforall x (Inexpert(x) -> Defog(x, adoree))\nforall x (Protracted(x) -> Hourly(x))\nforall x (Perjure(x, caitrin) and Inexpert(caitrin) -> Perjure(caitrin, ingelbert))\nforall x (Perjure(x, adoree) -> Hourly(x))\n\nnot Protracted(ingelbert)\n\nWithdraw(adoree, ingelbert) and Withdraw(ingelbert, adoree) and forall x (Withdraw(x, ingelbert) and Withdraw(ingelbert, adoree) -> Protracted(ingelbert)) -> therefore Protracted(ingelbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The gloriana affiliate the lou. The gloriana affiliate the mavis. The gloriana drill the mavis. The gloriana descale the lou. The lou affiliate the gloriana. The lou is tsaristic. The lou is acanthotic. The lou is taut. The lou drill the gloriana. The lou descale the gloriana. The mavis affiliate the gloriana. The mavis affiliate the lou. The mavis is unbuttoned. The mavis drill the gloriana. The mavis drill the lou. The mavis descale the lou. If someone affiliate the mavis and the mavis affiliate the gloriana then the mavis is tsaristic. If someone descale the gloriana and they eat the lou then the lou is acanthotic. If someone is uncured then they need the gloriana. All tsaristic people are acanthotic. If someone descale the lou and the lou is uncured then the lou descale the mavis. If someone descale the gloriana then they are acanthotic. The mavis is acanthotic.", "logic": "\nAffiliate(gloriana, lou)\nAffiliate(gloriana, mavis)\nDrill(gloriana, mavis)\nDescale(gloriana, lou)\nAffiliate(lou, gloriana)\nTsaristic(lou)\nAcanthotic(lou)\nTaut(lou)\nDrill(lou, gloriana)\nDescale(lou, gloriana)\nAffiliate(mavis, gloriana)\nAffiliate(mavis, lou)\nUnbuttoned(mavis)\nDrill(mavis, gloriana)\nDrill(mavis, lou)\nDescale(mavis, lou)\nforall x (Affiliate(x, mavis) and Affiliate(mavis, gloriana) -> Tsaristic(mavis))\nforall x (Descale(x, gloriana) and Affiliate(x, lou) -> Acanthotic(lou))\nforall x (Uncured(x) -> Drill(x, gloriana))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Acanthotic(x))\nforall x (Descale(x, lou) and Uncured(lou) -> Descale(lou, mavis))\nforall x (Descale(x, gloriana) -> Acanthotic(x))\n\nAcanthotic(mavis)\n\nAffiliate(gloriana, mavis) and Affiliate(mavis, gloriana) and forall x (Affiliate(x, mavis) and Affiliate(mavis, gloriana) -> Tsaristic(mavis)) -> therefore Tsaristic(mavis) Tsaristic(mavis) and forall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Acanthotic(x)) -> therefore Acanthotic(mavis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The valry jolt the elihu. The valry jolt the oral. The valry groom the oral. The valry hash the elihu. The elihu jolt the valry. The elihu is monodic. The elihu is sighted. The elihu is ghostly. The elihu groom the valry. The elihu hash the valry. The oral jolt the valry. The oral jolt the elihu. The oral is shrill. The oral groom the valry. The oral groom the elihu. The oral hash the elihu. If someone jolt the oral and the oral jolt the valry then the oral is monodic. If someone hash the valry and they eat the elihu then the elihu is sighted. If someone is incisive then they need the valry. All monodic people are sighted. If someone hash the elihu and the elihu is incisive then the elihu hash the oral. If someone hash the valry then they are sighted. The oral is not sighted.", "logic": "\nJolt(valry, elihu)\nJolt(valry, oral)\nGroom(valry, oral)\nHash(valry, elihu)\nJolt(elihu, valry)\nMonodic(elihu)\nSighted(elihu)\nGhostly(elihu)\nGroom(elihu, valry)\nHash(elihu, valry)\nJolt(oral, valry)\nJolt(oral, elihu)\nShrill(oral)\nGroom(oral, valry)\nGroom(oral, elihu)\nHash(oral, elihu)\nforall x (Jolt(x, oral) and Jolt(oral, valry) -> Monodic(oral))\nforall x (Hash(x, valry) and Jolt(x, elihu) -> Sighted(elihu))\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Groom(x, valry))\nforall x (Monodic(x) -> Sighted(x))\nforall x (Hash(x, elihu) and Incisive(elihu) -> Hash(elihu, oral))\nforall x (Hash(x, valry) -> Sighted(x))\n\nnot Sighted(oral)\n\nJolt(valry, oral) and Jolt(oral, valry) and forall x (Jolt(x, oral) and Jolt(oral, valry) -> Monodic(oral)) -> therefore Monodic(oral) Monodic(oral) and forall x (Monodic(x) -> Sighted(x)) -> therefore Sighted(oral)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The dannye pilot the dacy. The dannye pilot the charita. The dannye brainwash the charita. The dannye preclude the dacy. The dacy pilot the dannye. The dacy is enmeshed. The dacy is homoecious. The dacy is isomorphic. The dacy brainwash the dannye. The dacy preclude the dannye. The charita pilot the dannye. The charita pilot the dacy. The charita is crazy. The charita brainwash the dannye. The charita brainwash the dacy. The charita preclude the dacy. If someone pilot the charita and the charita pilot the dannye then the charita is enmeshed. If someone preclude the dannye and they eat the dacy then the dacy is homoecious. If someone is dreamlike then they need the dannye. All enmeshed people are homoecious. If someone preclude the dacy and the dacy is dreamlike then the dacy preclude the charita. If someone preclude the dannye then they are homoecious. The dannye is not homoecious.", "logic": "\nPilot(dannye, dacy)\nPilot(dannye, charita)\nBrainwash(dannye, charita)\nPreclude(dannye, dacy)\nPilot(dacy, dannye)\nEnmeshed(dacy)\nHomoecious(dacy)\nIsomorphic(dacy)\nBrainwash(dacy, dannye)\nPreclude(dacy, dannye)\nPilot(charita, dannye)\nPilot(charita, dacy)\nCrazy(charita)\nBrainwash(charita, dannye)\nBrainwash(charita, dacy)\nPreclude(charita, dacy)\nforall x (Pilot(x, charita) and Pilot(charita, dannye) -> Enmeshed(charita))\nforall x (Preclude(x, dannye) and Pilot(x, dacy) -> Homoecious(dacy))\nforall x (Dreamlike(x) -> Brainwash(x, dannye))\nforall x (Enmeshed(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nforall x (Preclude(x, dacy) and Dreamlike(dacy) -> Preclude(dacy, charita))\nforall x (Preclude(x, dannye) -> Homoecious(x))\n\nnot Homoecious(dannye)\n\nforall x (Enmeshed(x) -> Homoecious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The northrup polarise the nessa. The northrup polarise the deina. The northrup shove the deina. The northrup accrue the nessa. The nessa polarise the northrup. The nessa is owlish. The nessa is shattering. The nessa is batholitic. The nessa shove the northrup. The nessa accrue the northrup. The deina polarise the northrup. The deina polarise the nessa. The deina is fiducial. The deina shove the northrup. The deina shove the nessa. The deina accrue the nessa. If someone polarise the deina and the deina polarise the northrup then the deina is owlish. If someone accrue the northrup and they eat the nessa then the nessa is shattering. If someone is entitled then they need the northrup. All owlish people are shattering. If someone accrue the nessa and the nessa is entitled then the nessa accrue the deina. If someone accrue the northrup then they are shattering. The northrup shove the northrup.", "logic": "\nPolarise(northrup, nessa)\nPolarise(northrup, deina)\nShove(northrup, deina)\nAccrue(northrup, nessa)\nPolarise(nessa, northrup)\nOwlish(nessa)\nShattering(nessa)\nBatholitic(nessa)\nShove(nessa, northrup)\nAccrue(nessa, northrup)\nPolarise(deina, northrup)\nPolarise(deina, nessa)\nFiducial(deina)\nShove(deina, northrup)\nShove(deina, nessa)\nAccrue(deina, nessa)\nforall x (Polarise(x, deina) and Polarise(deina, northrup) -> Owlish(deina))\nforall x (Accrue(x, northrup) and Polarise(x, nessa) -> Shattering(nessa))\nforall x (Entitled(x) -> Shove(x, northrup))\nforall x (Owlish(x) -> Shattering(x))\nforall x (Accrue(x, nessa) and Entitled(nessa) -> Accrue(nessa, deina))\nforall x (Accrue(x, northrup) -> Shattering(x))\n\nShove(northrup, northrup)\n\nforall x (Entitled(x) -> Shove(x, northrup)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The carlye waver the ardella. The carlye waver the erich. The carlye frisk the erich. The carlye parole the ardella. The ardella waver the carlye. The ardella is atrophied. The ardella is stainable. The ardella is attacking. The ardella frisk the carlye. The ardella parole the carlye. The erich waver the carlye. The erich waver the ardella. The erich is lyrate. The erich frisk the carlye. The erich frisk the ardella. The erich parole the ardella. If someone waver the erich and the erich waver the carlye then the erich is atrophied. If someone parole the carlye and they eat the ardella then the ardella is stainable. If someone is tenebrous then they need the carlye. All atrophied people are stainable. If someone parole the ardella and the ardella is tenebrous then the ardella parole the erich. If someone parole the carlye then they are stainable. The ardella does not see the erich.", "logic": "\nWaver(carlye, ardella)\nWaver(carlye, erich)\nFrisk(carlye, erich)\nParole(carlye, ardella)\nWaver(ardella, carlye)\nAtrophied(ardella)\nStainable(ardella)\nAttacking(ardella)\nFrisk(ardella, carlye)\nParole(ardella, carlye)\nWaver(erich, carlye)\nWaver(erich, ardella)\nLyrate(erich)\nFrisk(erich, carlye)\nFrisk(erich, ardella)\nParole(erich, ardella)\nforall x (Waver(x, erich) and Waver(erich, carlye) -> Atrophied(erich))\nforall x (Parole(x, carlye) and Waver(x, ardella) -> Stainable(ardella))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Frisk(x, carlye))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Parole(x, ardella) and Tenebrous(ardella) -> Parole(ardella, erich))\nforall x (Parole(x, carlye) -> Stainable(x))\n\nnot Parole(ardella, erich)\n\nforall x (Parole(x, ardella) and Tenebrous(ardella) -> Parole(ardella, erich)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The willie inspissate the ronnica. The willie inspissate the theodore. The willie callous the theodore. The willie narrow the ronnica. The ronnica inspissate the willie. The ronnica is unseamed. The ronnica is carousing. The ronnica is rusted. The ronnica callous the willie. The ronnica narrow the willie. The theodore inspissate the willie. The theodore inspissate the ronnica. The theodore is sagittate. The theodore callous the willie. The theodore callous the ronnica. The theodore narrow the ronnica. If someone inspissate the theodore and the theodore inspissate the willie then the theodore is unseamed. If someone narrow the willie and they eat the ronnica then the ronnica is carousing. If someone is visualized then they need the willie. All unseamed people are carousing. If someone narrow the ronnica and the ronnica is visualized then the ronnica narrow the theodore. If someone narrow the willie then they are carousing. The willie inspissate the willie.", "logic": "\nInspissate(willie, ronnica)\nInspissate(willie, theodore)\nCallous(willie, theodore)\nNarrow(willie, ronnica)\nInspissate(ronnica, willie)\nUnseamed(ronnica)\nCarousing(ronnica)\nRusted(ronnica)\nCallous(ronnica, willie)\nNarrow(ronnica, willie)\nInspissate(theodore, willie)\nInspissate(theodore, ronnica)\nSagittate(theodore)\nCallous(theodore, willie)\nCallous(theodore, ronnica)\nNarrow(theodore, ronnica)\nforall x (Inspissate(x, theodore) and Inspissate(theodore, willie) -> Unseamed(theodore))\nforall x (Narrow(x, willie) and Inspissate(x, ronnica) -> Carousing(ronnica))\nforall x (Visualized(x) -> Callous(x, willie))\nforall x (Unseamed(x) -> Carousing(x))\nforall x (Narrow(x, ronnica) and Visualized(ronnica) -> Narrow(ronnica, theodore))\nforall x (Narrow(x, willie) -> Carousing(x))\n\nInspissate(willie, willie)\n\nInspissate(willie, willie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The stephanus photograph the eula. The stephanus photograph the teodoro. The stephanus samba the teodoro. The stephanus whiten the eula. The eula photograph the stephanus. The eula is attested. The eula is aversive. The eula is britannic. The eula samba the stephanus. The eula whiten the stephanus. The teodoro photograph the stephanus. The teodoro photograph the eula. The teodoro is impotent. The teodoro samba the stephanus. The teodoro samba the eula. The teodoro whiten the eula. If someone photograph the teodoro and the teodoro photograph the stephanus then the teodoro is attested. If someone whiten the stephanus and they eat the eula then the eula is aversive. If someone is affixial then they need the stephanus. All attested people are aversive. If someone whiten the eula and the eula is affixial then the eula whiten the teodoro. If someone whiten the stephanus then they are aversive. The eula does not eat the teodoro.", "logic": "\nPhotograph(stephanus, eula)\nPhotograph(stephanus, teodoro)\nSamba(stephanus, teodoro)\nWhiten(stephanus, eula)\nPhotograph(eula, stephanus)\nAttested(eula)\nAversive(eula)\nBritannic(eula)\nSamba(eula, stephanus)\nWhiten(eula, stephanus)\nPhotograph(teodoro, stephanus)\nPhotograph(teodoro, eula)\nImpotent(teodoro)\nSamba(teodoro, stephanus)\nSamba(teodoro, eula)\nWhiten(teodoro, eula)\nforall x (Photograph(x, teodoro) and Photograph(teodoro, stephanus) -> Attested(teodoro))\nforall x (Whiten(x, stephanus) and Photograph(x, eula) -> Aversive(eula))\nforall x (Affixial(x) -> Samba(x, stephanus))\nforall x (Attested(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Whiten(x, eula) and Affixial(eula) -> Whiten(eula, teodoro))\nforall x (Whiten(x, stephanus) -> Aversive(x))\n\nnot Photograph(eula, teodoro)\n\nnot Photograph(eula, teodoro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The wolfram signalise the elsy. The wolfram signalise the cornie. The wolfram grill the cornie. The wolfram habit the elsy. The elsy signalise the wolfram. The elsy is heterodox. The elsy is sapiens. The elsy is blate. The elsy grill the wolfram. The elsy habit the wolfram. The cornie signalise the wolfram. The cornie signalise the elsy. The cornie is linnean. The cornie grill the wolfram. The cornie grill the elsy. The cornie habit the elsy. If someone signalise the cornie and the cornie signalise the wolfram then the cornie is heterodox. If someone habit the wolfram and they eat the elsy then the elsy is sapiens. If someone is angled then they need the wolfram. All heterodox people are sapiens. If someone habit the elsy and the elsy is angled then the elsy habit the cornie. If someone habit the wolfram then they are sapiens. The elsy habit the elsy.", "logic": "\nSignalise(wolfram, elsy)\nSignalise(wolfram, cornie)\nGrill(wolfram, cornie)\nHabit(wolfram, elsy)\nSignalise(elsy, wolfram)\nHeterodox(elsy)\nSapiens(elsy)\nBlate(elsy)\nGrill(elsy, wolfram)\nHabit(elsy, wolfram)\nSignalise(cornie, wolfram)\nSignalise(cornie, elsy)\nLinnean(cornie)\nGrill(cornie, wolfram)\nGrill(cornie, elsy)\nHabit(cornie, elsy)\nforall x (Signalise(x, cornie) and Signalise(cornie, wolfram) -> Heterodox(cornie))\nforall x (Habit(x, wolfram) and Signalise(x, elsy) -> Sapiens(elsy))\nforall x (Angled(x) -> Grill(x, wolfram))\nforall x (Heterodox(x) -> Sapiens(x))\nforall x (Habit(x, elsy) and Angled(elsy) -> Habit(elsy, cornie))\nforall x (Habit(x, wolfram) -> Sapiens(x))\n\nHabit(elsy, elsy)\n\nHabit(elsy, elsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The doretta does not chase the cristin. The doretta is alert. The doretta is star. The doretta pave the cristin. The othilia chock the josiah. The othilia chock the cristin. The othilia is alert. The othilia pave the josiah. The othilia pave the cristin. The othilia fascinate the doretta. The josiah chock the doretta. The josiah is not star. The josiah pave the doretta. The josiah does not visit the doretta. The cristin fascinate the othilia. If someone is star and they do not see the othilia then they do not see the doretta. If someone pave the doretta and the doretta fascinate the cristin then the doretta fascinate the josiah. If someone fascinate the josiah then they do not chase the josiah. If someone pave the josiah then they chase the othilia. If someone is alert and they see the cristin then the cristin pave the josiah. If someone chock the cristin and they do not see the doretta then the cristin pave the josiah. If someone pave the josiah and the josiah does not chase the cristin then the josiah does not chase the othilia. If someone chock the othilia and they see the doretta then the othilia pave the josiah. The othilia pave the cristin.", "logic": "\nnot Chock(doretta, cristin)\nAlert(doretta)\nStar(doretta)\nPave(doretta, cristin)\nChock(othilia, josiah)\nChock(othilia, cristin)\nAlert(othilia)\nPave(othilia, josiah)\nPave(othilia, cristin)\nFascinate(othilia, doretta)\nChock(josiah, doretta)\nnot Star(josiah)\nPave(josiah, doretta)\nnot Fascinate(josiah, doretta)\nFascinate(cristin, othilia)\nforall x (Star(x) and not Pave(x, othilia) -> not Pave(x, doretta))\nforall x (Pave(x, doretta) and Fascinate(doretta, cristin) -> Fascinate(doretta, josiah))\nforall x (Fascinate(x, josiah) -> not Chock(x, josiah))\nforall x (Pave(x, josiah) -> Chock(x, othilia))\nforall x (Alert(x) and Pave(x, cristin) -> Pave(cristin, josiah))\nforall x (Chock(x, cristin) and not Pave(x, doretta) -> Pave(cristin, josiah))\nforall x (Pave(x, josiah) and not Chock(josiah, cristin) -> not Chock(josiah, othilia))\nforall x (Chock(x, othilia) and Pave(x, doretta) -> Pave(othilia, josiah))\n\nPave(othilia, cristin)\n\ntherefore Pave(othilia, cristin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The elianora does not chase the mignonne. The elianora is accurate. The elianora is moldy. The elianora negociate the mignonne. The darby loaf the claudelle. The darby loaf the mignonne. The darby is accurate. The darby negociate the claudelle. The darby negociate the mignonne. The darby cooperate the elianora. The claudelle loaf the elianora. The claudelle is not moldy. The claudelle negociate the elianora. The claudelle does not visit the elianora. The mignonne cooperate the darby. If someone is moldy and they do not see the darby then they do not see the elianora. If someone negociate the elianora and the elianora cooperate the mignonne then the elianora cooperate the claudelle. If someone cooperate the claudelle then they do not chase the claudelle. If someone negociate the claudelle then they chase the darby. If someone is accurate and they see the mignonne then the mignonne negociate the claudelle. If someone loaf the mignonne and they do not see the elianora then the mignonne negociate the claudelle. If someone negociate the claudelle and the claudelle does not chase the mignonne then the claudelle does not chase the darby. If someone loaf the darby and they see the elianora then the darby negociate the claudelle. The darby does not chase the mignonne.", "logic": "\nnot Loaf(elianora, mignonne)\nAccurate(elianora)\nMoldy(elianora)\nNegociate(elianora, mignonne)\nLoaf(darby, claudelle)\nLoaf(darby, mignonne)\nAccurate(darby)\nNegociate(darby, claudelle)\nNegociate(darby, mignonne)\nCooperate(darby, elianora)\nLoaf(claudelle, elianora)\nnot Moldy(claudelle)\nNegociate(claudelle, elianora)\nnot Cooperate(claudelle, elianora)\nCooperate(mignonne, darby)\nforall x (Moldy(x) and not Negociate(x, darby) -> not Negociate(x, elianora))\nforall x (Negociate(x, elianora) and Cooperate(elianora, mignonne) -> Cooperate(elianora, claudelle))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, claudelle) -> not Loaf(x, claudelle))\nforall x (Negociate(x, claudelle) -> Loaf(x, darby))\nforall x (Accurate(x) and Negociate(x, mignonne) -> Negociate(mignonne, claudelle))\nforall x (Loaf(x, mignonne) and not Negociate(x, elianora) -> Negociate(mignonne, claudelle))\nforall x (Negociate(x, claudelle) and not Loaf(claudelle, mignonne) -> not Loaf(claudelle, darby))\nforall x (Loaf(x, darby) and Negociate(x, elianora) -> Negociate(darby, claudelle))\n\nnot Loaf(darby, mignonne)\n\ntherefore Loaf(darby, mignonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The matthieu does not chase the blake. The matthieu is unstilted. The matthieu is outgoing. The matthieu indwell the blake. The jeremias lamb the derby. The jeremias lamb the blake. The jeremias is unstilted. The jeremias indwell the derby. The jeremias indwell the blake. The jeremias taper the matthieu. The derby lamb the matthieu. The derby is not outgoing. The derby indwell the matthieu. The derby does not visit the matthieu. The blake taper the jeremias. If someone is outgoing and they do not see the jeremias then they do not see the matthieu. If someone indwell the matthieu and the matthieu taper the blake then the matthieu taper the derby. If someone taper the derby then they do not chase the derby. If someone indwell the derby then they chase the jeremias. If someone is unstilted and they see the blake then the blake indwell the derby. If someone lamb the blake and they do not see the matthieu then the blake indwell the derby. If someone indwell the derby and the derby does not chase the blake then the derby does not chase the jeremias. If someone lamb the jeremias and they see the matthieu then the jeremias indwell the derby. The blake indwell the derby.", "logic": "\nnot Lamb(matthieu, blake)\nUnstilted(matthieu)\nOutgoing(matthieu)\nIndwell(matthieu, blake)\nLamb(jeremias, derby)\nLamb(jeremias, blake)\nUnstilted(jeremias)\nIndwell(jeremias, derby)\nIndwell(jeremias, blake)\nTaper(jeremias, matthieu)\nLamb(derby, matthieu)\nnot Outgoing(derby)\nIndwell(derby, matthieu)\nnot Taper(derby, matthieu)\nTaper(blake, jeremias)\nforall x (Outgoing(x) and not Indwell(x, jeremias) -> not Indwell(x, matthieu))\nforall x (Indwell(x, matthieu) and Taper(matthieu, blake) -> Taper(matthieu, derby))\nforall x (Taper(x, derby) -> not Lamb(x, derby))\nforall x (Indwell(x, derby) -> Lamb(x, jeremias))\nforall x (Unstilted(x) and Indwell(x, blake) -> Indwell(blake, derby))\nforall x (Lamb(x, blake) and not Indwell(x, matthieu) -> Indwell(blake, derby))\nforall x (Indwell(x, derby) and not Lamb(derby, blake) -> not Lamb(derby, jeremias))\nforall x (Lamb(x, jeremias) and Indwell(x, matthieu) -> Indwell(jeremias, derby))\n\nIndwell(blake, derby)\n\nUnstilted(matthieu) and Indwell(matthieu, blake) and forall x (Unstilted(x) and Indwell(x, blake) -> Indwell(blake, derby)) -> therefore Indwell(blake, derby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The clary does not chase the isabelita. The clary is areolar. The clary is dissimilar. The clary bawl the isabelita. The haskel dogsled the nico. The haskel dogsled the isabelita. The haskel is areolar. The haskel bawl the nico. The haskel bawl the isabelita. The haskel serenade the clary. The nico dogsled the clary. The nico is not dissimilar. The nico bawl the clary. The nico does not visit the clary. The isabelita serenade the haskel. If someone is dissimilar and they do not see the haskel then they do not see the clary. If someone bawl the clary and the clary serenade the isabelita then the clary serenade the nico. If someone serenade the nico then they do not chase the nico. If someone bawl the nico then they chase the haskel. If someone is areolar and they see the isabelita then the isabelita bawl the nico. If someone dogsled the isabelita and they do not see the clary then the isabelita bawl the nico. If someone bawl the nico and the nico does not chase the isabelita then the nico does not chase the haskel. If someone dogsled the haskel and they see the clary then the haskel bawl the nico. The isabelita does not see the nico.", "logic": "\nnot Dogsled(clary, isabelita)\nAreolar(clary)\nDissimilar(clary)\nBawl(clary, isabelita)\nDogsled(haskel, nico)\nDogsled(haskel, isabelita)\nAreolar(haskel)\nBawl(haskel, nico)\nBawl(haskel, isabelita)\nSerenade(haskel, clary)\nDogsled(nico, clary)\nnot Dissimilar(nico)\nBawl(nico, clary)\nnot Serenade(nico, clary)\nSerenade(isabelita, haskel)\nforall x (Dissimilar(x) and not Bawl(x, haskel) -> not Bawl(x, clary))\nforall x (Bawl(x, clary) and Serenade(clary, isabelita) -> Serenade(clary, nico))\nforall x (Serenade(x, nico) -> not Dogsled(x, nico))\nforall x (Bawl(x, nico) -> Dogsled(x, haskel))\nforall x (Areolar(x) and Bawl(x, isabelita) -> Bawl(isabelita, nico))\nforall x (Dogsled(x, isabelita) and not Bawl(x, clary) -> Bawl(isabelita, nico))\nforall x (Bawl(x, nico) and not Dogsled(nico, isabelita) -> not Dogsled(nico, haskel))\nforall x (Dogsled(x, haskel) and Bawl(x, clary) -> Bawl(haskel, nico))\n\nnot Bawl(isabelita, nico)\n\nAreolar(clary) and Bawl(clary, isabelita) and forall x (Areolar(x) and Bawl(x, isabelita) -> Bawl(isabelita, nico)) -> therefore Bawl(isabelita, nico)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The fox does not chase the lilly. The fox is deadpan. The fox is given. The fox creolize the lilly. The meghann feminise the marcy. The meghann feminise the lilly. The meghann is deadpan. The meghann creolize the marcy. The meghann creolize the lilly. The meghann loan the fox. The marcy feminise the fox. The marcy is not given. The marcy creolize the fox. The marcy does not visit the fox. The lilly loan the meghann. If someone is given and they do not see the meghann then they do not see the fox. If someone creolize the fox and the fox loan the lilly then the fox loan the marcy. If someone loan the marcy then they do not chase the marcy. If someone creolize the marcy then they chase the meghann. If someone is deadpan and they see the lilly then the lilly creolize the marcy. If someone feminise the lilly and they do not see the fox then the lilly creolize the marcy. If someone creolize the marcy and the marcy does not chase the lilly then the marcy does not chase the meghann. If someone feminise the meghann and they see the fox then the meghann creolize the marcy. The lilly feminise the meghann.", "logic": "\nnot Feminise(fox, lilly)\nDeadpan(fox)\nGiven(fox)\nCreolize(fox, lilly)\nFeminise(meghann, marcy)\nFeminise(meghann, lilly)\nDeadpan(meghann)\nCreolize(meghann, marcy)\nCreolize(meghann, lilly)\nLoan(meghann, fox)\nFeminise(marcy, fox)\nnot Given(marcy)\nCreolize(marcy, fox)\nnot Loan(marcy, fox)\nLoan(lilly, meghann)\nforall x (Given(x) and not Creolize(x, meghann) -> not Creolize(x, fox))\nforall x (Creolize(x, fox) and Loan(fox, lilly) -> Loan(fox, marcy))\nforall x (Loan(x, marcy) -> not Feminise(x, marcy))\nforall x (Creolize(x, marcy) -> Feminise(x, meghann))\nforall x (Deadpan(x) and Creolize(x, lilly) -> Creolize(lilly, marcy))\nforall x (Feminise(x, lilly) and not Creolize(x, fox) -> Creolize(lilly, marcy))\nforall x (Creolize(x, marcy) and not Feminise(marcy, lilly) -> not Feminise(marcy, meghann))\nforall x (Feminise(x, meghann) and Creolize(x, fox) -> Creolize(meghann, marcy))\n\nFeminise(lilly, meghann)\n\nDeadpan(fox) and Creolize(fox, lilly) and forall x (Deadpan(x) and Creolize(x, lilly) -> Creolize(lilly, marcy)) -> therefore Creolize(lilly, marcy) Creolize(lilly, marcy) and forall x (Creolize(x, marcy) -> Feminise(x, meghann)) -> therefore Feminise(lilly, meghann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The suzanna does not chase the caro. The suzanna is teasing. The suzanna is boughten. The suzanna bedew the caro. The levi blackmail the cyndi. The levi blackmail the caro. The levi is teasing. The levi bedew the cyndi. The levi bedew the caro. The levi blanket the suzanna. The cyndi blackmail the suzanna. The cyndi is not boughten. The cyndi bedew the suzanna. The cyndi does not visit the suzanna. The caro blanket the levi. If someone is boughten and they do not see the levi then they do not see the suzanna. If someone bedew the suzanna and the suzanna blanket the caro then the suzanna blanket the cyndi. If someone blanket the cyndi then they do not chase the cyndi. If someone bedew the cyndi then they chase the levi. If someone is teasing and they see the caro then the caro bedew the cyndi. If someone blackmail the caro and they do not see the suzanna then the caro bedew the cyndi. If someone bedew the cyndi and the cyndi does not chase the caro then the cyndi does not chase the levi. If someone blackmail the levi and they see the suzanna then the levi bedew the cyndi. The caro does not chase the levi.", "logic": "\nnot Blackmail(suzanna, caro)\nTeasing(suzanna)\nBoughten(suzanna)\nBedew(suzanna, caro)\nBlackmail(levi, cyndi)\nBlackmail(levi, caro)\nTeasing(levi)\nBedew(levi, cyndi)\nBedew(levi, caro)\nBlanket(levi, suzanna)\nBlackmail(cyndi, suzanna)\nnot Boughten(cyndi)\nBedew(cyndi, suzanna)\nnot Blanket(cyndi, suzanna)\nBlanket(caro, levi)\nforall x (Boughten(x) and not Bedew(x, levi) -> not Bedew(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Bedew(x, suzanna) and Blanket(suzanna, caro) -> Blanket(suzanna, cyndi))\nforall x (Blanket(x, cyndi) -> not Blackmail(x, cyndi))\nforall x (Bedew(x, cyndi) -> Blackmail(x, levi))\nforall x (Teasing(x) and Bedew(x, caro) -> Bedew(caro, cyndi))\nforall x (Blackmail(x, caro) and not Bedew(x, suzanna) -> Bedew(caro, cyndi))\nforall x (Bedew(x, cyndi) and not Blackmail(cyndi, caro) -> not Blackmail(cyndi, levi))\nforall x (Blackmail(x, levi) and Bedew(x, suzanna) -> Bedew(levi, cyndi))\n\nnot Blackmail(caro, levi)\n\nTeasing(suzanna) and Bedew(suzanna, caro) and forall x (Teasing(x) and Bedew(x, caro) -> Bedew(caro, cyndi)) -> therefore Bedew(caro, cyndi) Bedew(caro, cyndi) and forall x (Bedew(x, cyndi) -> Blackmail(x, levi)) -> therefore Blackmail(caro, levi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The blondie does not chase the mattie. The blondie is satiated. The blondie is xenophobic. The blondie torture the mattie. The delbert foster the maya. The delbert foster the mattie. The delbert is satiated. The delbert torture the maya. The delbert torture the mattie. The delbert alleviate the blondie. The maya foster the blondie. The maya is not xenophobic. The maya torture the blondie. The maya does not visit the blondie. The mattie alleviate the delbert. If someone is xenophobic and they do not see the delbert then they do not see the blondie. If someone torture the blondie and the blondie alleviate the mattie then the blondie alleviate the maya. If someone alleviate the maya then they do not chase the maya. If someone torture the maya then they chase the delbert. If someone is satiated and they see the mattie then the mattie torture the maya. If someone foster the mattie and they do not see the blondie then the mattie torture the maya. If someone torture the maya and the maya does not chase the mattie then the maya does not chase the delbert. If someone foster the delbert and they see the blondie then the delbert torture the maya. The blondie does not visit the maya.", "logic": "\nnot Foster(blondie, mattie)\nSatiated(blondie)\nXenophobic(blondie)\nTorture(blondie, mattie)\nFoster(delbert, maya)\nFoster(delbert, mattie)\nSatiated(delbert)\nTorture(delbert, maya)\nTorture(delbert, mattie)\nAlleviate(delbert, blondie)\nFoster(maya, blondie)\nnot Xenophobic(maya)\nTorture(maya, blondie)\nnot Alleviate(maya, blondie)\nAlleviate(mattie, delbert)\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and not Torture(x, delbert) -> not Torture(x, blondie))\nforall x (Torture(x, blondie) and Alleviate(blondie, mattie) -> Alleviate(blondie, maya))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, maya) -> not Foster(x, maya))\nforall x (Torture(x, maya) -> Foster(x, delbert))\nforall x (Satiated(x) and Torture(x, mattie) -> Torture(mattie, maya))\nforall x (Foster(x, mattie) and not Torture(x, blondie) -> Torture(mattie, maya))\nforall x (Torture(x, maya) and not Foster(maya, mattie) -> not Foster(maya, delbert))\nforall x (Foster(x, delbert) and Torture(x, blondie) -> Torture(delbert, maya))\n\nnot Alleviate(blondie, maya)\n\nforall x (Torture(x, blondie) and Alleviate(blondie, mattie) -> Alleviate(blondie, maya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The alaa does not chase the meridel. The alaa is advised. The alaa is mesmerised. The alaa devoice the meridel. The cordy rhapsodise the trescha. The cordy rhapsodise the meridel. The cordy is advised. The cordy devoice the trescha. The cordy devoice the meridel. The cordy caponize the alaa. The trescha rhapsodise the alaa. The trescha is not mesmerised. The trescha devoice the alaa. The trescha does not visit the alaa. The meridel caponize the cordy. If someone is mesmerised and they do not see the cordy then they do not see the alaa. If someone devoice the alaa and the alaa caponize the meridel then the alaa caponize the trescha. If someone caponize the trescha then they do not chase the trescha. If someone devoice the trescha then they chase the cordy. If someone is advised and they see the meridel then the meridel devoice the trescha. If someone rhapsodise the meridel and they do not see the alaa then the meridel devoice the trescha. If someone devoice the trescha and the trescha does not chase the meridel then the trescha does not chase the cordy. If someone rhapsodise the cordy and they see the alaa then the cordy devoice the trescha. The trescha rhapsodise the cordy.", "logic": "\nnot Rhapsodise(alaa, meridel)\nAdvised(alaa)\nMesmerised(alaa)\nDevoice(alaa, meridel)\nRhapsodise(cordy, trescha)\nRhapsodise(cordy, meridel)\nAdvised(cordy)\nDevoice(cordy, trescha)\nDevoice(cordy, meridel)\nCaponize(cordy, alaa)\nRhapsodise(trescha, alaa)\nnot Mesmerised(trescha)\nDevoice(trescha, alaa)\nnot Caponize(trescha, alaa)\nCaponize(meridel, cordy)\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and not Devoice(x, cordy) -> not Devoice(x, alaa))\nforall x (Devoice(x, alaa) and Caponize(alaa, meridel) -> Caponize(alaa, trescha))\nforall x (Caponize(x, trescha) -> not Rhapsodise(x, trescha))\nforall x (Devoice(x, trescha) -> Rhapsodise(x, cordy))\nforall x (Advised(x) and Devoice(x, meridel) -> Devoice(meridel, trescha))\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, meridel) and not Devoice(x, alaa) -> Devoice(meridel, trescha))\nforall x (Devoice(x, trescha) and not Rhapsodise(trescha, meridel) -> not Rhapsodise(trescha, cordy))\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, cordy) and Devoice(x, alaa) -> Devoice(cordy, trescha))\n\nRhapsodise(trescha, cordy)\n\nforall x (Devoice(x, trescha) -> Rhapsodise(x, cordy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The gregg does not chase the maxwell. The gregg is decisive. The gregg is port. The gregg dread the maxwell. The jennette abrase the maris. The jennette abrase the maxwell. The jennette is decisive. The jennette dread the maris. The jennette dread the maxwell. The jennette game the gregg. The maris abrase the gregg. The maris is not port. The maris dread the gregg. The maris does not visit the gregg. The maxwell game the jennette. If someone is port and they do not see the jennette then they do not see the gregg. If someone dread the gregg and the gregg game the maxwell then the gregg game the maris. If someone game the maris then they do not chase the maris. If someone dread the maris then they chase the jennette. If someone is decisive and they see the maxwell then the maxwell dread the maris. If someone abrase the maxwell and they do not see the gregg then the maxwell dread the maris. If someone dread the maris and the maris does not chase the maxwell then the maris does not chase the jennette. If someone abrase the jennette and they see the gregg then the jennette dread the maris. The gregg does not chase the jennette.", "logic": "\nnot Abrase(gregg, maxwell)\nDecisive(gregg)\nPort(gregg)\nDread(gregg, maxwell)\nAbrase(jennette, maris)\nAbrase(jennette, maxwell)\nDecisive(jennette)\nDread(jennette, maris)\nDread(jennette, maxwell)\nGame(jennette, gregg)\nAbrase(maris, gregg)\nnot Port(maris)\nDread(maris, gregg)\nnot Game(maris, gregg)\nGame(maxwell, jennette)\nforall x (Port(x) and not Dread(x, jennette) -> not Dread(x, gregg))\nforall x (Dread(x, gregg) and Game(gregg, maxwell) -> Game(gregg, maris))\nforall x (Game(x, maris) -> not Abrase(x, maris))\nforall x (Dread(x, maris) -> Abrase(x, jennette))\nforall x (Decisive(x) and Dread(x, maxwell) -> Dread(maxwell, maris))\nforall x (Abrase(x, maxwell) and not Dread(x, gregg) -> Dread(maxwell, maris))\nforall x (Dread(x, maris) and not Abrase(maris, maxwell) -> not Abrase(maris, jennette))\nforall x (Abrase(x, jennette) and Dread(x, gregg) -> Dread(jennette, maris))\n\nnot Abrase(gregg, jennette)\n\nforall x (Dread(x, maris) -> Abrase(x, jennette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The margaret does not chase the susanna. The margaret is inhuman. The margaret is cumulous. The margaret slabber the susanna. The jule omen the nahum. The jule omen the susanna. The jule is inhuman. The jule slabber the nahum. The jule slabber the susanna. The jule ticktack the margaret. The nahum omen the margaret. The nahum is not cumulous. The nahum slabber the margaret. The nahum does not visit the margaret. The susanna ticktack the jule. If someone is cumulous and they do not see the jule then they do not see the margaret. If someone slabber the margaret and the margaret ticktack the susanna then the margaret ticktack the nahum. If someone ticktack the nahum then they do not chase the nahum. If someone slabber the nahum then they chase the jule. If someone is inhuman and they see the susanna then the susanna slabber the nahum. If someone omen the susanna and they do not see the margaret then the susanna slabber the nahum. If someone slabber the nahum and the nahum does not chase the susanna then the nahum does not chase the jule. If someone omen the jule and they see the margaret then the jule slabber the nahum. The margaret slabber the margaret.", "logic": "\nnot Omen(margaret, susanna)\nInhuman(margaret)\nCumulous(margaret)\nSlabber(margaret, susanna)\nOmen(jule, nahum)\nOmen(jule, susanna)\nInhuman(jule)\nSlabber(jule, nahum)\nSlabber(jule, susanna)\nTicktack(jule, margaret)\nOmen(nahum, margaret)\nnot Cumulous(nahum)\nSlabber(nahum, margaret)\nnot Ticktack(nahum, margaret)\nTicktack(susanna, jule)\nforall x (Cumulous(x) and not Slabber(x, jule) -> not Slabber(x, margaret))\nforall x (Slabber(x, margaret) and Ticktack(margaret, susanna) -> Ticktack(margaret, nahum))\nforall x (Ticktack(x, nahum) -> not Omen(x, nahum))\nforall x (Slabber(x, nahum) -> Omen(x, jule))\nforall x (Inhuman(x) and Slabber(x, susanna) -> Slabber(susanna, nahum))\nforall x (Omen(x, susanna) and not Slabber(x, margaret) -> Slabber(susanna, nahum))\nforall x (Slabber(x, nahum) and not Omen(nahum, susanna) -> not Omen(nahum, jule))\nforall x (Omen(x, jule) and Slabber(x, margaret) -> Slabber(jule, nahum))\n\nSlabber(margaret, margaret)\n\nSlabber(margaret, margaret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The lola does not chase the dryke. The lola is facetious. The lola is rustless. The lola bench the dryke. The ramon regress the emili. The ramon regress the dryke. The ramon is facetious. The ramon bench the emili. The ramon bench the dryke. The ramon better the lola. The emili regress the lola. The emili is not rustless. The emili bench the lola. The emili does not visit the lola. The dryke better the ramon. If someone is rustless and they do not see the ramon then they do not see the lola. If someone bench the lola and the lola better the dryke then the lola better the emili. If someone better the emili then they do not chase the emili. If someone bench the emili then they chase the ramon. If someone is facetious and they see the dryke then the dryke bench the emili. If someone regress the dryke and they do not see the lola then the dryke bench the emili. If someone bench the emili and the emili does not chase the dryke then the emili does not chase the ramon. If someone regress the ramon and they see the lola then the ramon bench the emili. The dryke does not visit the emili.", "logic": "\nnot Regress(lola, dryke)\nFacetious(lola)\nRustless(lola)\nBench(lola, dryke)\nRegress(ramon, emili)\nRegress(ramon, dryke)\nFacetious(ramon)\nBench(ramon, emili)\nBench(ramon, dryke)\nBetter(ramon, lola)\nRegress(emili, lola)\nnot Rustless(emili)\nBench(emili, lola)\nnot Better(emili, lola)\nBetter(dryke, ramon)\nforall x (Rustless(x) and not Bench(x, ramon) -> not Bench(x, lola))\nforall x (Bench(x, lola) and Better(lola, dryke) -> Better(lola, emili))\nforall x (Better(x, emili) -> not Regress(x, emili))\nforall x (Bench(x, emili) -> Regress(x, ramon))\nforall x (Facetious(x) and Bench(x, dryke) -> Bench(dryke, emili))\nforall x (Regress(x, dryke) and not Bench(x, lola) -> Bench(dryke, emili))\nforall x (Bench(x, emili) and not Regress(emili, dryke) -> not Regress(emili, ramon))\nforall x (Regress(x, ramon) and Bench(x, lola) -> Bench(ramon, emili))\n\nnot Better(dryke, emili)\n\nnot Better(dryke, emili) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The kylila does not chase the terra. The kylila is inducive. The kylila is maledict. The kylila supple the terra. The valerye fudge the howie. The valerye fudge the terra. The valerye is inducive. The valerye supple the howie. The valerye supple the terra. The valerye sensitize the kylila. The howie fudge the kylila. The howie is not maledict. The howie supple the kylila. The howie does not visit the kylila. The terra sensitize the valerye. If someone is maledict and they do not see the valerye then they do not see the kylila. If someone supple the kylila and the kylila sensitize the terra then the kylila sensitize the howie. If someone sensitize the howie then they do not chase the howie. If someone supple the howie then they chase the valerye. If someone is inducive and they see the terra then the terra supple the howie. If someone fudge the terra and they do not see the kylila then the terra supple the howie. If someone supple the howie and the howie does not chase the terra then the howie does not chase the valerye. If someone fudge the valerye and they see the kylila then the valerye supple the howie. The valerye sensitize the terra.", "logic": "\nnot Fudge(kylila, terra)\nInducive(kylila)\nMaledict(kylila)\nSupple(kylila, terra)\nFudge(valerye, howie)\nFudge(valerye, terra)\nInducive(valerye)\nSupple(valerye, howie)\nSupple(valerye, terra)\nSensitize(valerye, kylila)\nFudge(howie, kylila)\nnot Maledict(howie)\nSupple(howie, kylila)\nnot Sensitize(howie, kylila)\nSensitize(terra, valerye)\nforall x (Maledict(x) and not Supple(x, valerye) -> not Supple(x, kylila))\nforall x (Supple(x, kylila) and Sensitize(kylila, terra) -> Sensitize(kylila, howie))\nforall x (Sensitize(x, howie) -> not Fudge(x, howie))\nforall x (Supple(x, howie) -> Fudge(x, valerye))\nforall x (Inducive(x) and Supple(x, terra) -> Supple(terra, howie))\nforall x (Fudge(x, terra) and not Supple(x, kylila) -> Supple(terra, howie))\nforall x (Supple(x, howie) and not Fudge(howie, terra) -> not Fudge(howie, valerye))\nforall x (Fudge(x, valerye) and Supple(x, kylila) -> Supple(valerye, howie))\n\nSensitize(valerye, terra)\n\nSensitize(valerye, terra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "Margot is pillared. Margot is cardboard. Margot is emphasized. Margot is mosstone. Margot is hypertonic. Margot is topknotted. Margot is incestuous. Natassia is pillared. Natassia is cardboard. Natassia is emphasized. Natassia is mosstone. Natassia is hypertonic. Natassia is topknotted. Natassia is incestuous. Raquela is pillared. Raquela is emphasized. All emphasized things are mosstone. If something is mosstone then it is incestuous. Margot is mosstone.", "logic": "\nPillared(margot)\nCardboard(margot)\nEmphasized(margot)\nMosstone(margot)\nHypertonic(margot)\nTopknotted(margot)\nIncestuous(margot)\nPillared(natassia)\nCardboard(natassia)\nEmphasized(natassia)\nMosstone(natassia)\nHypertonic(natassia)\nTopknotted(natassia)\nIncestuous(natassia)\nPillared(raquela)\nEmphasized(raquela)\nforall x (Emphasized(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Mosstone(x) -> Incestuous(x))\n\nMosstone(margot)\n\ntherefore Mosstone(margot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Debbi is trilled. Debbi is unfattened. Debbi is fictitious. Debbi is canopied. Debbi is sextuple. Debbi is curvey. Debbi is gummy. Leigha is trilled. Leigha is unfattened. Leigha is fictitious. Leigha is canopied. Leigha is sextuple. Leigha is curvey. Leigha is gummy. Gretchen is trilled. Gretchen is fictitious. All fictitious things are canopied. If something is canopied then it is gummy. Leigha is not curvey.", "logic": "\nTrilled(debbi)\nUnfattened(debbi)\nFictitious(debbi)\nCanopied(debbi)\nSextuple(debbi)\nCurvey(debbi)\nGummy(debbi)\nTrilled(leigha)\nUnfattened(leigha)\nFictitious(leigha)\nCanopied(leigha)\nSextuple(leigha)\nCurvey(leigha)\nGummy(leigha)\nTrilled(gretchen)\nFictitious(gretchen)\nforall x (Fictitious(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> Gummy(x))\n\nnot Curvey(leigha)\n\ntherefore Curvey(leigha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Bernard is cognisant. Bernard is unsaleable. Bernard is intensive. Bernard is localised. Bernard is lacrimal. Bernard is cosy. Bernard is coolheaded. Giavani is cognisant. Giavani is unsaleable. Giavani is intensive. Giavani is localised. Giavani is lacrimal. Giavani is cosy. Giavani is coolheaded. Barbette is cognisant. Barbette is intensive. All intensive things are localised. If something is localised then it is coolheaded. Barbette is localised.", "logic": "\nCognisant(bernard)\nUnsaleable(bernard)\nIntensive(bernard)\nLocalised(bernard)\nLacrimal(bernard)\nCosy(bernard)\nCoolheaded(bernard)\nCognisant(giavani)\nUnsaleable(giavani)\nIntensive(giavani)\nLocalised(giavani)\nLacrimal(giavani)\nCosy(giavani)\nCoolheaded(giavani)\nCognisant(barbette)\nIntensive(barbette)\nforall x (Intensive(x) -> Localised(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) -> Coolheaded(x))\n\nLocalised(barbette)\n\nIntensive(barbette) and forall x (Intensive(x) -> Localised(x)) -> therefore Localised(barbette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Miranda is romany. Miranda is ashen. Miranda is reductive. Miranda is endearing. Miranda is desegrated. Miranda is unused. Miranda is cogitable. Keren is romany. Keren is ashen. Keren is reductive. Keren is endearing. Keren is desegrated. Keren is unused. Keren is cogitable. Marven is romany. Marven is reductive. All reductive things are endearing. If something is endearing then it is cogitable. Marven is not endearing.", "logic": "\nRomany(miranda)\nAshen(miranda)\nReductive(miranda)\nEndearing(miranda)\nDesegrated(miranda)\nUnused(miranda)\nCogitable(miranda)\nRomany(keren)\nAshen(keren)\nReductive(keren)\nEndearing(keren)\nDesegrated(keren)\nUnused(keren)\nCogitable(keren)\nRomany(marven)\nReductive(marven)\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Endearing(x) -> Cogitable(x))\n\nnot Endearing(marven)\n\nReductive(marven) and forall x (Reductive(x) -> Endearing(x)) -> therefore Endearing(marven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Gisella is raising. Gisella is lively. Gisella is renegade. Gisella is caudal. Gisella is whacked. Gisella is improved. Gisella is congolese. Nicky is raising. Nicky is lively. Nicky is renegade. Nicky is caudal. Nicky is whacked. Nicky is improved. Nicky is congolese. Andri is raising. Andri is renegade. All renegade things are caudal. If something is caudal then it is congolese. Andri is congolese.", "logic": "\nRaising(gisella)\nLively(gisella)\nRenegade(gisella)\nCaudal(gisella)\nWhacked(gisella)\nImproved(gisella)\nCongolese(gisella)\nRaising(nicky)\nLively(nicky)\nRenegade(nicky)\nCaudal(nicky)\nWhacked(nicky)\nImproved(nicky)\nCongolese(nicky)\nRaising(andri)\nRenegade(andri)\nforall x (Renegade(x) -> Caudal(x))\nforall x (Caudal(x) -> Congolese(x))\n\nCongolese(andri)\n\nRenegade(andri) and forall x (Renegade(x) -> Caudal(x)) -> therefore Caudal(andri) Caudal(andri) and forall x (Caudal(x) -> Congolese(x)) -> therefore Congolese(andri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Binnie is scrawny. Binnie is mesenteric. Binnie is spasmodic. Binnie is worsening. Binnie is anecdotic. Binnie is flakey. Binnie is virucidal. Eyde is scrawny. Eyde is mesenteric. Eyde is spasmodic. Eyde is worsening. Eyde is anecdotic. Eyde is flakey. Eyde is virucidal. Guinna is scrawny. Guinna is spasmodic. All spasmodic things are worsening. If something is worsening then it is virucidal. Guinna is not virucidal.", "logic": "\nScrawny(binnie)\nMesenteric(binnie)\nSpasmodic(binnie)\nWorsening(binnie)\nAnecdotic(binnie)\nFlakey(binnie)\nVirucidal(binnie)\nScrawny(eyde)\nMesenteric(eyde)\nSpasmodic(eyde)\nWorsening(eyde)\nAnecdotic(eyde)\nFlakey(eyde)\nVirucidal(eyde)\nScrawny(guinna)\nSpasmodic(guinna)\nforall x (Spasmodic(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Worsening(x) -> Virucidal(x))\n\nnot Virucidal(guinna)\n\nSpasmodic(guinna) and forall x (Spasmodic(x) -> Worsening(x)) -> therefore Worsening(guinna) Worsening(guinna) and forall x (Worsening(x) -> Virucidal(x)) -> therefore Virucidal(guinna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Marielle is bosky. Marielle is sacerdotal. Marielle is third. Marielle is dressy. Marielle is plumbic. Marielle is liveried. Marielle is conjoined. Rupert is bosky. Rupert is sacerdotal. Rupert is third. Rupert is dressy. Rupert is plumbic. Rupert is liveried. Rupert is conjoined. Ciara is bosky. Ciara is third. All third things are dressy. If something is dressy then it is conjoined. Ciara is not plumbic.", "logic": "\nBosky(marielle)\nSacerdotal(marielle)\nThird(marielle)\nDressy(marielle)\nPlumbic(marielle)\nLiveried(marielle)\nConjoined(marielle)\nBosky(rupert)\nSacerdotal(rupert)\nThird(rupert)\nDressy(rupert)\nPlumbic(rupert)\nLiveried(rupert)\nConjoined(rupert)\nBosky(ciara)\nThird(ciara)\nforall x (Third(x) -> Dressy(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) -> Conjoined(x))\n\nnot Plumbic(ciara)\n\nnot Plumbic(ciara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Aida is hiemal. Aida is thunderous. Aida is adulterate. Aida is unjointed. Aida is spoilable. Aida is healing. Aida is annual. Harriott is hiemal. Harriott is thunderous. Harriott is adulterate. Harriott is unjointed. Harriott is spoilable. Harriott is healing. Harriott is annual. Ranee is hiemal. Ranee is adulterate. All adulterate things are unjointed. If something is unjointed then it is annual. Ranee is thunderous.", "logic": "\nHiemal(aida)\nThunderous(aida)\nAdulterate(aida)\nUnjointed(aida)\nSpoilable(aida)\nHealing(aida)\nAnnual(aida)\nHiemal(harriott)\nThunderous(harriott)\nAdulterate(harriott)\nUnjointed(harriott)\nSpoilable(harriott)\nHealing(harriott)\nAnnual(harriott)\nHiemal(ranee)\nAdulterate(ranee)\nforall x (Adulterate(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Unjointed(x) -> Annual(x))\n\nThunderous(ranee)\n\nThunderous(ranee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-325"} {"premises": "Randie is taboo. Randie is napoleonic. Randie is starved. Randie is greyed. Randie is not henpecked. Randie is teasing. Randie is biogenetic. Conni is taboo. Conni is napoleonic. Conni is teasing. If Conni is greyed then Conni is henpecked. If Conni is teasing then Conni is greyed. Cold, starved things are teasing. Randie is taboo.", "logic": "\nTaboo(randie)\nNapoleonic(randie)\nStarved(randie)\nGreyed(randie)\nnot Henpecked(randie)\nTeasing(randie)\nBiogenetic(randie)\nTaboo(conni)\nNapoleonic(conni)\nTeasing(conni)\nGreyed(conni) -> Henpecked(conni)\nTeasing(conni) -> Greyed(conni)\nforall x (Taboo(x) and Starved(x) -> Teasing(x))\n\nTaboo(randie)\n\ntherefore Taboo(randie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Blinni is hormonal. Blinni is geometric. Blinni is despairing. Blinni is mawkish. Blinni is not translunar. Blinni is cropped. Blinni is insolvable. Aurelea is hormonal. Aurelea is geometric. Aurelea is cropped. If Aurelea is mawkish then Aurelea is translunar. If Aurelea is cropped then Aurelea is mawkish. Cold, despairing things are cropped. Blinni is not insolvable.", "logic": "\nHormonal(blinni)\nGeometric(blinni)\nDespairing(blinni)\nMawkish(blinni)\nnot Translunar(blinni)\nCropped(blinni)\nInsolvable(blinni)\nHormonal(aurelea)\nGeometric(aurelea)\nCropped(aurelea)\nMawkish(aurelea) -> Translunar(aurelea)\nCropped(aurelea) -> Mawkish(aurelea)\nforall x (Hormonal(x) and Despairing(x) -> Cropped(x))\n\nnot Insolvable(blinni)\n\ntherefore Insolvable(blinni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Iormina is mulish. Iormina is familiar. Iormina is diluvian. Iormina is antitoxic. Iormina is not symbolical. Iormina is slippery. Iormina is respectful. Johnathon is mulish. Johnathon is familiar. Johnathon is slippery. If Johnathon is antitoxic then Johnathon is symbolical. If Johnathon is slippery then Johnathon is antitoxic. Cold, diluvian things are slippery. Johnathon is antitoxic.", "logic": "\nMulish(iormina)\nFamiliar(iormina)\nDiluvian(iormina)\nAntitoxic(iormina)\nnot Symbolical(iormina)\nSlippery(iormina)\nRespectful(iormina)\nMulish(johnathon)\nFamiliar(johnathon)\nSlippery(johnathon)\nAntitoxic(johnathon) -> Symbolical(johnathon)\nSlippery(johnathon) -> Antitoxic(johnathon)\nforall x (Mulish(x) and Diluvian(x) -> Slippery(x))\n\nAntitoxic(johnathon)\n\nSlippery(johnathon) and Slippery(johnathon) -> Antitoxic(johnathon) -> therefore Antitoxic(johnathon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Andra is overmodest. Andra is imminent. Andra is domed. Andra is deadlocked. Andra is not vagal. Andra is perfidious. Andra is effete. Arlen is overmodest. Arlen is imminent. Arlen is perfidious. If Arlen is deadlocked then Arlen is vagal. If Arlen is perfidious then Arlen is deadlocked. Cold, domed things are perfidious. Arlen is not deadlocked.", "logic": "\nOvermodest(andra)\nImminent(andra)\nDomed(andra)\nDeadlocked(andra)\nnot Vagal(andra)\nPerfidious(andra)\nEffete(andra)\nOvermodest(arlen)\nImminent(arlen)\nPerfidious(arlen)\nDeadlocked(arlen) -> Vagal(arlen)\nPerfidious(arlen) -> Deadlocked(arlen)\nforall x (Overmodest(x) and Domed(x) -> Perfidious(x))\n\nnot Deadlocked(arlen)\n\nPerfidious(arlen) and Perfidious(arlen) -> Deadlocked(arlen) -> therefore Deadlocked(arlen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Hertha is candescent. Hertha is staunch. Hertha is shitless. Hertha is washable. Hertha is not opposing. Hertha is tapered. Hertha is seaward. Ardis is candescent. Ardis is staunch. Ardis is tapered. If Ardis is washable then Ardis is opposing. If Ardis is tapered then Ardis is washable. Cold, shitless things are tapered. Ardis is opposing.", "logic": "\nCandescent(hertha)\nStaunch(hertha)\nShitless(hertha)\nWashable(hertha)\nnot Opposing(hertha)\nTapered(hertha)\nSeaward(hertha)\nCandescent(ardis)\nStaunch(ardis)\nTapered(ardis)\nWashable(ardis) -> Opposing(ardis)\nTapered(ardis) -> Washable(ardis)\nforall x (Candescent(x) and Shitless(x) -> Tapered(x))\n\nOpposing(ardis)\n\nTapered(ardis) and Tapered(ardis) -> Washable(ardis) -> therefore Washable(ardis) Washable(ardis) and Washable(ardis) -> Opposing(ardis) -> therefore Opposing(ardis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Clem is prakritic. Clem is driving. Clem is subaltern. Clem is recessive. Clem is not educative. Clem is diffident. Clem is removed. Skylar is prakritic. Skylar is driving. Skylar is diffident. If Skylar is recessive then Skylar is educative. If Skylar is diffident then Skylar is recessive. Cold, subaltern things are diffident. Skylar is not educative.", "logic": "\nPrakritic(clem)\nDriving(clem)\nSubaltern(clem)\nRecessive(clem)\nnot Educative(clem)\nDiffident(clem)\nRemoved(clem)\nPrakritic(skylar)\nDriving(skylar)\nDiffident(skylar)\nRecessive(skylar) -> Educative(skylar)\nDiffident(skylar) -> Recessive(skylar)\nforall x (Prakritic(x) and Subaltern(x) -> Diffident(x))\n\nnot Educative(skylar)\n\nDiffident(skylar) and Diffident(skylar) -> Recessive(skylar) -> therefore Recessive(skylar) Recessive(skylar) and Recessive(skylar) -> Educative(skylar) -> therefore Educative(skylar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Saba is creedal. Saba is ferial. Saba is expiratory. Saba is thundering. Saba is not adient. Saba is coveted. Saba is onstage. Ursulina is creedal. Ursulina is ferial. Ursulina is coveted. If Ursulina is thundering then Ursulina is adient. If Ursulina is coveted then Ursulina is thundering. Cold, expiratory things are coveted. Ursulina is not expiratory.", "logic": "\nCreedal(saba)\nFerial(saba)\nExpiratory(saba)\nThundering(saba)\nnot Adient(saba)\nCoveted(saba)\nOnstage(saba)\nCreedal(ursulina)\nFerial(ursulina)\nCoveted(ursulina)\nThundering(ursulina) -> Adient(ursulina)\nCoveted(ursulina) -> Thundering(ursulina)\nforall x (Creedal(x) and Expiratory(x) -> Coveted(x))\n\nnot Expiratory(ursulina)\n\nnot Expiratory(ursulina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Adora is sweeping. Adora is conjugate. Adora is semitropic. Adora is nonstick. Adora is not salacious. Adora is laden. Adora is fleeceable. Celestia is sweeping. Celestia is conjugate. Celestia is laden. If Celestia is nonstick then Celestia is salacious. If Celestia is laden then Celestia is nonstick. Cold, semitropic things are laden. Celestia is fleeceable.", "logic": "\nSweeping(adora)\nConjugate(adora)\nSemitropic(adora)\nNonstick(adora)\nnot Salacious(adora)\nLaden(adora)\nFleeceable(adora)\nSweeping(celestia)\nConjugate(celestia)\nLaden(celestia)\nNonstick(celestia) -> Salacious(celestia)\nLaden(celestia) -> Nonstick(celestia)\nforall x (Sweeping(x) and Semitropic(x) -> Laden(x))\n\nFleeceable(celestia)\n\nFleeceable(celestia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "Fergus is exacting. Rickard is threepenny. Emlynn is unmoving. Pandora is retro. If someone is exacting then they are threepenny. If someone is unmoving then they are threepenny. Cold people are not especial. Fergus is exacting.", "logic": "\nExacting(fergus)\nThreepenny(rickard)\nUnmoving(emlynn)\nRetro(pandora)\nforall x (Exacting(x) -> Threepenny(x))\nforall x (Unmoving(x) -> Threepenny(x))\nforall x (Threepenny(x) -> not Especial(x))\n\nExacting(fergus)\n\ntherefore Exacting(fergus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Garvey is cloisonne. Alis is flattering. Alla is undersea. Manfred is ascendent. If someone is cloisonne then they are flattering. If someone is undersea then they are flattering. Cold people are not engraved. Garvey is not cloisonne.", "logic": "\nCloisonne(garvey)\nFlattering(alis)\nUndersea(alla)\nAscendent(manfred)\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Flattering(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Flattering(x))\nforall x (Flattering(x) -> not Engraved(x))\n\nnot Cloisonne(garvey)\n\ntherefore Cloisonne(garvey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Amandy is graphic. Dian is apophyseal. Haywood is linnean. Lib is connatural. If someone is graphic then they are apophyseal. If someone is linnean then they are apophyseal. Cold people are not sworn. Amandy is apophyseal.", "logic": "\nGraphic(amandy)\nApophyseal(dian)\nLinnean(haywood)\nConnatural(lib)\nforall x (Graphic(x) -> Apophyseal(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) -> Apophyseal(x))\nforall x (Apophyseal(x) -> not Sworn(x))\n\nApophyseal(amandy)\n\nGraphic(amandy) and forall x (Graphic(x) -> Apophyseal(x)) -> therefore Apophyseal(amandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Jenda is reflective. Sloan is amblyopic. Dorthy is especial. Lorry is keynesian. If someone is reflective then they are amblyopic. If someone is especial then they are amblyopic. Cold people are not unpolished. Dorthy is not amblyopic.", "logic": "\nReflective(jenda)\nAmblyopic(sloan)\nEspecial(dorthy)\nKeynesian(lorry)\nforall x (Reflective(x) -> Amblyopic(x))\nforall x (Especial(x) -> Amblyopic(x))\nforall x (Amblyopic(x) -> not Unpolished(x))\n\nnot Amblyopic(dorthy)\n\nEspecial(dorthy) and forall x (Especial(x) -> Amblyopic(x)) -> therefore Amblyopic(dorthy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Reggis is irksome. Liuka is dogmatical. Bekki is inspired. Patrice is himalayan. If someone is irksome then they are dogmatical. If someone is inspired then they are dogmatical. Cold people are not nicaean. Reggis is not nicaean.", "logic": "\nIrksome(reggis)\nDogmatical(liuka)\nInspired(bekki)\nHimalayan(patrice)\nforall x (Irksome(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\nforall x (Dogmatical(x) -> not Nicaean(x))\n\nnot Nicaean(reggis)\n\nIrksome(reggis) and forall x (Irksome(x) -> Dogmatical(x)) -> therefore Dogmatical(reggis) Dogmatical(reggis) and forall x (Dogmatical(x) -> not Nicaean(x)) -> therefore not Nicaean(reggis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Fons is detectable. Lorenzo is coroneted. Opalina is worthy. Francois is iberian. If someone is detectable then they are coroneted. If someone is worthy then they are coroneted. Cold people are not liege. Opalina is liege.", "logic": "\nDetectable(fons)\nCoroneted(lorenzo)\nWorthy(opalina)\nIberian(francois)\nforall x (Detectable(x) -> Coroneted(x))\nforall x (Worthy(x) -> Coroneted(x))\nforall x (Coroneted(x) -> not Liege(x))\n\nLiege(opalina)\n\nWorthy(opalina) and forall x (Worthy(x) -> Coroneted(x)) -> therefore Coroneted(opalina) Coroneted(opalina) and forall x (Coroneted(x) -> not Liege(x)) -> therefore not Liege(opalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Aubert is tattered. Harv is braided. Guy is shackled. Gweneth is infantile. If someone is tattered then they are braided. If someone is shackled then they are braided. Cold people are not chilean. Gweneth is not braided.", "logic": "\nTattered(aubert)\nBraided(harv)\nShackled(guy)\nInfantile(gweneth)\nforall x (Tattered(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Shackled(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Braided(x) -> not Chilean(x))\n\nnot Braided(gweneth)\n\nforall x (Tattered(x) -> Braided(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Gilles is fried. Mellisa is reliant. Shelbi is eighty. Madeline is curtained. If someone is fried then they are reliant. If someone is eighty then they are reliant. Cold people are not eccentric. Madeline is fried.", "logic": "\nFried(gilles)\nReliant(mellisa)\nEighty(shelbi)\nCurtained(madeline)\nforall x (Fried(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Eighty(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Reliant(x) -> not Eccentric(x))\n\nFried(madeline)\n\nFried(madeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Apollo is megalithic. Mommy is processed. Thomasine is mexican. Reta is aerolitic. If someone is megalithic then they are processed. If someone is mexican then they are processed. Cold people are not upcoming. Reta is not mexican.", "logic": "\nMegalithic(apollo)\nProcessed(mommy)\nMexican(thomasine)\nAerolitic(reta)\nforall x (Megalithic(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Mexican(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) -> not Upcoming(x))\n\nnot Mexican(reta)\n\nnot Mexican(reta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Gerold is polish. Kimberley is biyearly. Ronalda is silent. Tammy is capsulate. If someone is polish then they are biyearly. If someone is silent then they are biyearly. Cold people are not canonised. Gerold is round.", "logic": "\nPolish(gerold)\nBiyearly(kimberley)\nSilent(ronalda)\nCapsulate(tammy)\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nforall x (Silent(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> not Canonised(x))\n\nRound(gerold)\n\nRound(gerold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Roby is achromic. Angelika is inside. Latisha is plumed. Indira is main. If someone is achromic then they are inside. If someone is plumed then they are inside. Cold people are not color. Latisha is not achromic.", "logic": "\nAchromic(roby)\nInside(angelika)\nPlumed(latisha)\nMain(indira)\nforall x (Achromic(x) -> Inside(x))\nforall x (Plumed(x) -> Inside(x))\nforall x (Inside(x) -> not Color(x))\n\nnot Achromic(latisha)\n\nnot Achromic(latisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Ali is envisioned. Roddie is lactogenic. Stephen is triumphant. Audi is rosaceous. If someone is envisioned then they are lactogenic. If someone is triumphant then they are lactogenic. Cold people are not ominous. Roddie is rosaceous.", "logic": "\nEnvisioned(ali)\nLactogenic(roddie)\nTriumphant(stephen)\nRosaceous(audi)\nforall x (Envisioned(x) -> Lactogenic(x))\nforall x (Triumphant(x) -> Lactogenic(x))\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) -> not Ominous(x))\n\nRosaceous(roddie)\n\nRosaceous(roddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-322"} {"premises": "Amandie is skilful. Jeannette is impressive. Ellie is not impressive. If something is impressive and not ignescent then it is unbiased. All impressive things are weather. Green, bistred things are weather. If something is ignescent and weather then it is skilful. If something is weather then it is not skilful. If something is weather and skilful then it is rooted. Jeannette is impressive.", "logic": "\nSkilful(amandie)\nImpressive(jeannette)\nnot Impressive(ellie)\nforall x (Impressive(x) and not Ignescent(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nforall x (Impressive(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Ignescent(x) and Bistred(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Ignescent(x) and Weather(x) -> Skilful(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) -> not Skilful(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) and Skilful(x) -> Rooted(x))\n\nImpressive(jeannette)\n\ntherefore Impressive(jeannette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Mike is enzymatic. Osborn is pseudo. Deanna is not pseudo. If something is pseudo and not bounded then it is brindled. All pseudo things are sour. Green, wakeful things are sour. If something is bounded and sour then it is enzymatic. If something is sour then it is not enzymatic. If something is sour and enzymatic then it is texan. Deanna is pseudo.", "logic": "\nEnzymatic(mike)\nPseudo(osborn)\nnot Pseudo(deanna)\nforall x (Pseudo(x) and not Bounded(x) -> Brindled(x))\nforall x (Pseudo(x) -> Sour(x))\nforall x (Bounded(x) and Wakeful(x) -> Sour(x))\nforall x (Bounded(x) and Sour(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Sour(x) -> not Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Sour(x) and Enzymatic(x) -> Texan(x))\n\nPseudo(deanna)\n\ntherefore not Pseudo(deanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Jacob is sportive. Jobi is fickle. Kelwin is not fickle. If something is fickle and not exegetic then it is palpatory. All fickle things are happy. Green, lonely things are happy. If something is exegetic and happy then it is sportive. If something is happy then it is not sportive. If something is happy and sportive then it is iraki. Jobi is happy.", "logic": "\nSportive(jacob)\nFickle(jobi)\nnot Fickle(kelwin)\nforall x (Fickle(x) and not Exegetic(x) -> Palpatory(x))\nforall x (Fickle(x) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Exegetic(x) and Lonely(x) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Exegetic(x) and Happy(x) -> Sportive(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) -> not Sportive(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) and Sportive(x) -> Iraki(x))\n\nHappy(jobi)\n\nFickle(jobi) and forall x (Fickle(x) -> Happy(x)) -> therefore Happy(jobi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Norm is inherent. Eddi is giddy. Adaline is not giddy. If something is giddy and not playful then it is scotch. All giddy things are lustrous. Green, fueled things are lustrous. If something is playful and lustrous then it is inherent. If something is lustrous then it is not inherent. If something is lustrous and inherent then it is artesian. Eddi is not lustrous.", "logic": "\nInherent(norm)\nGiddy(eddi)\nnot Giddy(adaline)\nforall x (Giddy(x) and not Playful(x) -> Scotch(x))\nforall x (Giddy(x) -> Lustrous(x))\nforall x (Playful(x) and Fueled(x) -> Lustrous(x))\nforall x (Playful(x) and Lustrous(x) -> Inherent(x))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> not Inherent(x))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) and Inherent(x) -> Artesian(x))\n\nnot Lustrous(eddi)\n\nGiddy(eddi) and forall x (Giddy(x) -> Lustrous(x)) -> therefore Lustrous(eddi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Frederich is infrared. Zonnya is kyphotic. Marina is not kyphotic. If something is kyphotic and not corneal then it is smashing. All kyphotic things are exoergic. Green, instinct things are exoergic. If something is corneal and exoergic then it is infrared. If something is exoergic then it is not infrared. If something is exoergic and infrared then it is undefended. Zonnya is not infrared.", "logic": "\nInfrared(frederich)\nKyphotic(zonnya)\nnot Kyphotic(marina)\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) and not Corneal(x) -> Smashing(x))\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Corneal(x) and Instinct(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Corneal(x) and Exoergic(x) -> Infrared(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> not Infrared(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) and Infrared(x) -> Undefended(x))\n\nnot Infrared(zonnya)\n\nKyphotic(zonnya) and forall x (Kyphotic(x) -> Exoergic(x)) -> therefore Exoergic(zonnya) Exoergic(zonnya) and forall x (Exoergic(x) -> not Infrared(x)) -> therefore not Infrared(zonnya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Maure is lossless. Marcelia is scheming. Lorain is not scheming. If something is scheming and not spirited then it is discerning. All scheming things are interested. Green, blanched things are interested. If something is spirited and interested then it is lossless. If something is interested then it is not lossless. If something is interested and lossless then it is crackers. Marcelia is lossless.", "logic": "\nLossless(maure)\nScheming(marcelia)\nnot Scheming(lorain)\nforall x (Scheming(x) and not Spirited(x) -> Discerning(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) -> Interested(x))\nforall x (Spirited(x) and Blanched(x) -> Interested(x))\nforall x (Spirited(x) and Interested(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Interested(x) -> not Lossless(x))\nforall x (Interested(x) and Lossless(x) -> Crackers(x))\n\nLossless(marcelia)\n\nScheming(marcelia) and forall x (Scheming(x) -> Interested(x)) -> therefore Interested(marcelia) Interested(marcelia) and forall x (Interested(x) -> not Lossless(x)) -> therefore not Lossless(marcelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Ilyse is fingerlike. Charlene is unspotted. Tito is not unspotted. If something is unspotted and not baroque then it is inured. All unspotted things are ovine. Green, thwarting things are ovine. If something is baroque and ovine then it is fingerlike. If something is ovine then it is not fingerlike. If something is ovine and fingerlike then it is lithesome. Tito is not lithesome.", "logic": "\nFingerlike(ilyse)\nUnspotted(charlene)\nnot Unspotted(tito)\nforall x (Unspotted(x) and not Baroque(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Unspotted(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) and Thwarting(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) and Ovine(x) -> Fingerlike(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> not Fingerlike(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) and Fingerlike(x) -> Lithesome(x))\n\nnot Lithesome(tito)\n\nforall x (Ovine(x) and Fingerlike(x) -> Lithesome(x)) <- forall x (Unspotted(x) -> Ovine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Herbie is calico. Morena is metaphoric. Rory is not metaphoric. If something is metaphoric and not suboceanic then it is epithelial. All metaphoric things are susurrous. Green, dendritic things are susurrous. If something is suboceanic and susurrous then it is calico. If something is susurrous then it is not calico. If something is susurrous and calico then it is warped. Herbie is susurrous.", "logic": "\nCalico(herbie)\nMetaphoric(morena)\nnot Metaphoric(rory)\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) and not Suboceanic(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Susurrous(x))\nforall x (Suboceanic(x) and Dendritic(x) -> Susurrous(x))\nforall x (Suboceanic(x) and Susurrous(x) -> Calico(x))\nforall x (Susurrous(x) -> not Calico(x))\nforall x (Susurrous(x) and Calico(x) -> Warped(x))\n\nSusurrous(herbie)\n\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Susurrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Elene is yeatsian. Pammi is contagious. Arda is not contagious. If something is contagious and not kinetic then it is near. All contagious things are uncouth. Green, acronymic things are uncouth. If something is kinetic and uncouth then it is yeatsian. If something is uncouth then it is not yeatsian. If something is uncouth and yeatsian then it is bifocal. Arda is not near.", "logic": "\nYeatsian(elene)\nContagious(pammi)\nnot Contagious(arda)\nforall x (Contagious(x) and not Kinetic(x) -> Near(x))\nforall x (Contagious(x) -> Uncouth(x))\nforall x (Kinetic(x) and Acronymic(x) -> Uncouth(x))\nforall x (Kinetic(x) and Uncouth(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Uncouth(x) -> not Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Uncouth(x) and Yeatsian(x) -> Bifocal(x))\n\nnot Near(arda)\n\nforall x (Contagious(x) and not Kinetic(x) -> Near(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Gladys is obscene. Fionnula is useable. Blinni is not useable. If something is useable and not realizable then it is biaural. All useable things are shinto. Green, saddled things are shinto. If something is realizable and shinto then it is obscene. If something is shinto then it is not obscene. If something is shinto and obscene then it is caucasoid. Fionnula is realizable.", "logic": "\nObscene(gladys)\nUseable(fionnula)\nnot Useable(blinni)\nforall x (Useable(x) and not Realizable(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (Useable(x) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Realizable(x) and Saddled(x) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Realizable(x) and Shinto(x) -> Obscene(x))\nforall x (Shinto(x) -> not Obscene(x))\nforall x (Shinto(x) and Obscene(x) -> Caucasoid(x))\n\nRealizable(fionnula)\n\nRealizable(fionnula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Lucila is warped. Valentia is wheaten. Ansell is not wheaten. If something is wheaten and not splayfoot then it is propelling. All wheaten things are unchanged. Green, impugnable things are unchanged. If something is splayfoot and unchanged then it is warped. If something is unchanged then it is not warped. If something is unchanged and warped then it is sent. Lucila is not splayfoot.", "logic": "\nWarped(lucila)\nWheaten(valentia)\nnot Wheaten(ansell)\nforall x (Wheaten(x) and not Splayfoot(x) -> Propelling(x))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Impugnable(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Unchanged(x) -> Warped(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) -> not Warped(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) and Warped(x) -> Sent(x))\n\nnot Splayfoot(lucila)\n\nnot Splayfoot(lucila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "Felisha is alienating. Wain is unsalaried. Caspar is not unsalaried. If something is unsalaried and not dietary then it is luscious. All unsalaried things are jovian. Green, unsettled things are jovian. If something is dietary and jovian then it is alienating. If something is jovian then it is not alienating. If something is jovian and alienating then it is posted. Wain is unsettled.", "logic": "\nAlienating(felisha)\nUnsalaried(wain)\nnot Unsalaried(caspar)\nforall x (Unsalaried(x) and not Dietary(x) -> Luscious(x))\nforall x (Unsalaried(x) -> Jovian(x))\nforall x (Dietary(x) and Unsettled(x) -> Jovian(x))\nforall x (Dietary(x) and Jovian(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) -> not Alienating(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) and Alienating(x) -> Posted(x))\n\nUnsettled(wain)\n\nUnsettled(wain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1389"} {"premises": "The carrissa is proficient. The doroteya queen the etheline. The nissy is not sedgelike. The etheline is sedgelike. If something queen the carrissa and the carrissa wigwag the etheline then it does not see the carrissa. If something is proficient and it treat the etheline then it wigwag the nissy. If something queen the carrissa then the carrissa is not apogamic. If something is proficient then it treat the etheline. If the nissy treat the doroteya and the doroteya is apogamic then the nissy queen the etheline. If something queen the etheline then the etheline is sedgelike. If the etheline is not provable then the etheline wigwag the carrissa. If the doroteya does not visit the etheline then the etheline does not see the nissy. The carrissa is proficient.", "logic": "\nProficient(carrissa)\nQueen(doroteya, etheline)\nnot Sedgelike(nissy)\nSedgelike(etheline)\nforall x (Queen(x, carrissa) and Wigwag(carrissa, etheline) -> not Wigwag(x, carrissa))\nforall x (Proficient(x) and Treat(x, etheline) -> Wigwag(x, nissy))\nforall x (Queen(x, carrissa) -> not Apogamic(carrissa))\nforall x (Proficient(x) -> Treat(x, etheline))\nTreat(nissy, doroteya) and Apogamic(doroteya) -> Queen(nissy, etheline)\nforall x (Queen(x, etheline) -> Sedgelike(etheline))\nnot Provable(etheline) -> Wigwag(etheline, carrissa)\nnot Treat(doroteya, etheline) -> not Wigwag(etheline, nissy)\n\nProficient(carrissa)\n\ntherefore Proficient(carrissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The gigi is seamanly. The bengt clunk the anny. The jasper is not venerable. The anny is venerable. If something clunk the gigi and the gigi welt the anny then it does not see the gigi. If something is seamanly and it undrape the anny then it welt the jasper. If something clunk the gigi then the gigi is not rhythmic. If something is seamanly then it undrape the anny. If the jasper undrape the bengt and the bengt is rhythmic then the jasper clunk the anny. If something clunk the anny then the anny is venerable. If the anny is not immunised then the anny welt the gigi. If the bengt does not visit the anny then the anny does not see the jasper. The jasper is venerable.", "logic": "\nSeamanly(gigi)\nClunk(bengt, anny)\nnot Venerable(jasper)\nVenerable(anny)\nforall x (Clunk(x, gigi) and Welt(gigi, anny) -> not Welt(x, gigi))\nforall x (Seamanly(x) and Undrape(x, anny) -> Welt(x, jasper))\nforall x (Clunk(x, gigi) -> not Rhythmic(gigi))\nforall x (Seamanly(x) -> Undrape(x, anny))\nUndrape(jasper, bengt) and Rhythmic(bengt) -> Clunk(jasper, anny)\nforall x (Clunk(x, anny) -> Venerable(anny))\nnot Immunised(anny) -> Welt(anny, gigi)\nnot Undrape(bengt, anny) -> not Welt(anny, jasper)\n\nVenerable(jasper)\n\ntherefore not Venerable(jasper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The annamaria is bedimmed. The charlena blockade the debra. The irene is not duodenal. The debra is duodenal. If something blockade the annamaria and the annamaria cotton the debra then it does not see the annamaria. If something is bedimmed and it skreak the debra then it cotton the irene. If something blockade the annamaria then the annamaria is not flowery. If something is bedimmed then it skreak the debra. If the irene skreak the charlena and the charlena is flowery then the irene blockade the debra. If something blockade the debra then the debra is duodenal. If the debra is not chelonian then the debra cotton the annamaria. If the charlena does not visit the debra then the debra does not see the irene. The annamaria skreak the debra.", "logic": "\nBedimmed(annamaria)\nBlockade(charlena, debra)\nnot Duodenal(irene)\nDuodenal(debra)\nforall x (Blockade(x, annamaria) and Cotton(annamaria, debra) -> not Cotton(x, annamaria))\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) and Skreak(x, debra) -> Cotton(x, irene))\nforall x (Blockade(x, annamaria) -> not Flowery(annamaria))\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) -> Skreak(x, debra))\nSkreak(irene, charlena) and Flowery(charlena) -> Blockade(irene, debra)\nforall x (Blockade(x, debra) -> Duodenal(debra))\nnot Chelonian(debra) -> Cotton(debra, annamaria)\nnot Skreak(charlena, debra) -> not Cotton(debra, irene)\n\nSkreak(annamaria, debra)\n\nBedimmed(annamaria) and forall x (Bedimmed(x) -> Skreak(x, debra)) -> therefore Skreak(annamaria, debra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The arlyn is hebraic. The quigly prevail the ariel. The jilly is not unbranded. The ariel is unbranded. If something prevail the arlyn and the arlyn remunerate the ariel then it does not see the arlyn. If something is hebraic and it disprove the ariel then it remunerate the jilly. If something prevail the arlyn then the arlyn is not hoar. If something is hebraic then it disprove the ariel. If the jilly disprove the quigly and the quigly is hoar then the jilly prevail the ariel. If something prevail the ariel then the ariel is unbranded. If the ariel is not bombproof then the ariel remunerate the arlyn. If the quigly does not visit the ariel then the ariel does not see the jilly. The arlyn does not visit the ariel.", "logic": "\nHebraic(arlyn)\nPrevail(quigly, ariel)\nnot Unbranded(jilly)\nUnbranded(ariel)\nforall x (Prevail(x, arlyn) and Remunerate(arlyn, ariel) -> not Remunerate(x, arlyn))\nforall x (Hebraic(x) and Disprove(x, ariel) -> Remunerate(x, jilly))\nforall x (Prevail(x, arlyn) -> not Hoar(arlyn))\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Disprove(x, ariel))\nDisprove(jilly, quigly) and Hoar(quigly) -> Prevail(jilly, ariel)\nforall x (Prevail(x, ariel) -> Unbranded(ariel))\nnot Bombproof(ariel) -> Remunerate(ariel, arlyn)\nnot Disprove(quigly, ariel) -> not Remunerate(ariel, jilly)\n\nnot Disprove(arlyn, ariel)\n\nHebraic(arlyn) and forall x (Hebraic(x) -> Disprove(x, ariel)) -> therefore Disprove(arlyn, ariel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The dana is gullible. The gillie gruntle the letti. The danie is not baboonish. The letti is baboonish. If something gruntle the dana and the dana limit the letti then it does not see the dana. If something is gullible and it camphorate the letti then it limit the danie. If something gruntle the dana then the dana is not lumpy. If something is gullible then it camphorate the letti. If the danie camphorate the gillie and the gillie is lumpy then the danie gruntle the letti. If something gruntle the letti then the letti is baboonish. If the letti is not friable then the letti limit the dana. If the gillie does not visit the letti then the letti does not see the danie. The dana limit the danie.", "logic": "\nGullible(dana)\nGruntle(gillie, letti)\nnot Baboonish(danie)\nBaboonish(letti)\nforall x (Gruntle(x, dana) and Limit(dana, letti) -> not Limit(x, dana))\nforall x (Gullible(x) and Camphorate(x, letti) -> Limit(x, danie))\nforall x (Gruntle(x, dana) -> not Lumpy(dana))\nforall x (Gullible(x) -> Camphorate(x, letti))\nCamphorate(danie, gillie) and Lumpy(gillie) -> Gruntle(danie, letti)\nforall x (Gruntle(x, letti) -> Baboonish(letti))\nnot Friable(letti) -> Limit(letti, dana)\nnot Camphorate(gillie, letti) -> not Limit(letti, danie)\n\nLimit(dana, danie)\n\nGullible(dana) and forall x (Gullible(x) -> Camphorate(x, letti)) -> therefore Camphorate(dana, letti) Gullible(dana) and Camphorate(dana, letti) and forall x (Gullible(x) and Camphorate(x, letti) -> Limit(x, danie)) -> therefore Limit(dana, danie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The mitra is correlated. The eugenia frogmarch the domenic. The bride is not odious. The domenic is odious. If something frogmarch the mitra and the mitra utter the domenic then it does not see the mitra. If something is correlated and it gobble the domenic then it utter the bride. If something frogmarch the mitra then the mitra is not fleet. If something is correlated then it gobble the domenic. If the bride gobble the eugenia and the eugenia is fleet then the bride frogmarch the domenic. If something frogmarch the domenic then the domenic is odious. If the domenic is not smoothed then the domenic utter the mitra. If the eugenia does not visit the domenic then the domenic does not see the bride. The mitra does not see the bride.", "logic": "\nCorrelated(mitra)\nFrogmarch(eugenia, domenic)\nnot Odious(bride)\nOdious(domenic)\nforall x (Frogmarch(x, mitra) and Utter(mitra, domenic) -> not Utter(x, mitra))\nforall x (Correlated(x) and Gobble(x, domenic) -> Utter(x, bride))\nforall x (Frogmarch(x, mitra) -> not Fleet(mitra))\nforall x (Correlated(x) -> Gobble(x, domenic))\nGobble(bride, eugenia) and Fleet(eugenia) -> Frogmarch(bride, domenic)\nforall x (Frogmarch(x, domenic) -> Odious(domenic))\nnot Smoothed(domenic) -> Utter(domenic, mitra)\nnot Gobble(eugenia, domenic) -> not Utter(domenic, bride)\n\nnot Utter(mitra, bride)\n\nCorrelated(mitra) and forall x (Correlated(x) -> Gobble(x, domenic)) -> therefore Gobble(mitra, domenic) Correlated(mitra) and Gobble(mitra, domenic) and forall x (Correlated(x) and Gobble(x, domenic) -> Utter(x, bride)) -> therefore Utter(mitra, bride)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The clemmy is suctorial. The davina smooch the millicent. The roana is not assigned. The millicent is assigned. If something smooch the clemmy and the clemmy vend the millicent then it does not see the clemmy. If something is suctorial and it apologize the millicent then it vend the roana. If something smooch the clemmy then the clemmy is not chimerical. If something is suctorial then it apologize the millicent. If the roana apologize the davina and the davina is chimerical then the roana smooch the millicent. If something smooch the millicent then the millicent is assigned. If the millicent is not captivated then the millicent vend the clemmy. If the davina does not visit the millicent then the millicent does not see the roana. The millicent does not visit the millicent.", "logic": "\nSuctorial(clemmy)\nSmooch(davina, millicent)\nnot Assigned(roana)\nAssigned(millicent)\nforall x (Smooch(x, clemmy) and Vend(clemmy, millicent) -> not Vend(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Suctorial(x) and Apologize(x, millicent) -> Vend(x, roana))\nforall x (Smooch(x, clemmy) -> not Chimerical(clemmy))\nforall x (Suctorial(x) -> Apologize(x, millicent))\nApologize(roana, davina) and Chimerical(davina) -> Smooch(roana, millicent)\nforall x (Smooch(x, millicent) -> Assigned(millicent))\nnot Captivated(millicent) -> Vend(millicent, clemmy)\nnot Apologize(davina, millicent) -> not Vend(millicent, roana)\n\nnot Apologize(millicent, millicent)\n\nforall x (Suctorial(x) -> Apologize(x, millicent)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The rodd is designed. The anthe regale the waiter. The julee is not aphyllous. The waiter is aphyllous. If something regale the rodd and the rodd crease the waiter then it does not see the rodd. If something is designed and it infatuate the waiter then it crease the julee. If something regale the rodd then the rodd is not archaistic. If something is designed then it infatuate the waiter. If the julee infatuate the anthe and the anthe is archaistic then the julee regale the waiter. If something regale the waiter then the waiter is aphyllous. If the waiter is not rejected then the waiter crease the rodd. If the anthe does not visit the waiter then the waiter does not see the julee. The julee infatuate the waiter.", "logic": "\nDesigned(rodd)\nRegale(anthe, waiter)\nnot Aphyllous(julee)\nAphyllous(waiter)\nforall x (Regale(x, rodd) and Crease(rodd, waiter) -> not Crease(x, rodd))\nforall x (Designed(x) and Infatuate(x, waiter) -> Crease(x, julee))\nforall x (Regale(x, rodd) -> not Archaistic(rodd))\nforall x (Designed(x) -> Infatuate(x, waiter))\nInfatuate(julee, anthe) and Archaistic(anthe) -> Regale(julee, waiter)\nforall x (Regale(x, waiter) -> Aphyllous(waiter))\nnot Rejected(waiter) -> Crease(waiter, rodd)\nnot Infatuate(anthe, waiter) -> not Crease(waiter, julee)\n\nInfatuate(julee, waiter)\n\nforall x (Designed(x) -> Infatuate(x, waiter)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The clarinda is terminable. The reilly detail the sanders. The abby is not bovine. The sanders is bovine. If something detail the clarinda and the clarinda solder the sanders then it does not see the clarinda. If something is terminable and it capsulise the sanders then it solder the abby. If something detail the clarinda then the clarinda is not resultant. If something is terminable then it capsulise the sanders. If the abby capsulise the reilly and the reilly is resultant then the abby detail the sanders. If something detail the sanders then the sanders is bovine. If the sanders is not solvable then the sanders solder the clarinda. If the reilly does not visit the sanders then the sanders does not see the abby. The reilly does not visit the sanders.", "logic": "\nTerminable(clarinda)\nDetail(reilly, sanders)\nnot Bovine(abby)\nBovine(sanders)\nforall x (Detail(x, clarinda) and Solder(clarinda, sanders) -> not Solder(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Terminable(x) and Capsulise(x, sanders) -> Solder(x, abby))\nforall x (Detail(x, clarinda) -> not Resultant(clarinda))\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Capsulise(x, sanders))\nCapsulise(abby, reilly) and Resultant(reilly) -> Detail(abby, sanders)\nforall x (Detail(x, sanders) -> Bovine(sanders))\nnot Solvable(sanders) -> Solder(sanders, clarinda)\nnot Capsulise(reilly, sanders) -> not Solder(sanders, abby)\n\nnot Capsulise(reilly, sanders)\n\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Capsulise(x, sanders)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The willey is windup. The kenton holiday the swen. The aubrie is not hoarse. The swen is hoarse. If something holiday the willey and the willey instil the swen then it does not see the willey. If something is windup and it sputter the swen then it instil the aubrie. If something holiday the willey then the willey is not lamblike. If something is windup then it sputter the swen. If the aubrie sputter the kenton and the kenton is lamblike then the aubrie holiday the swen. If something holiday the swen then the swen is hoarse. If the swen is not soured then the swen instil the willey. If the kenton does not visit the swen then the swen does not see the aubrie. The swen sputter the willey.", "logic": "\nWindup(willey)\nHoliday(kenton, swen)\nnot Hoarse(aubrie)\nHoarse(swen)\nforall x (Holiday(x, willey) and Instil(willey, swen) -> not Instil(x, willey))\nforall x (Windup(x) and Sputter(x, swen) -> Instil(x, aubrie))\nforall x (Holiday(x, willey) -> not Lamblike(willey))\nforall x (Windup(x) -> Sputter(x, swen))\nSputter(aubrie, kenton) and Lamblike(kenton) -> Holiday(aubrie, swen)\nforall x (Holiday(x, swen) -> Hoarse(swen))\nnot Soured(swen) -> Instil(swen, willey)\nnot Sputter(kenton, swen) -> not Instil(swen, aubrie)\n\nSputter(swen, willey)\n\nSputter(swen, willey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The jessee is seamanly. The ardis abut the giovanna. The willmott is not argent. The giovanna is argent. If something abut the jessee and the jessee crew the giovanna then it does not see the jessee. If something is seamanly and it analyse the giovanna then it crew the willmott. If something abut the jessee then the jessee is not monarchal. If something is seamanly then it analyse the giovanna. If the willmott analyse the ardis and the ardis is monarchal then the willmott abut the giovanna. If something abut the giovanna then the giovanna is argent. If the giovanna is not terminal then the giovanna crew the jessee. If the ardis does not visit the giovanna then the giovanna does not see the willmott. The ardis is not seamanly.", "logic": "\nSeamanly(jessee)\nAbut(ardis, giovanna)\nnot Argent(willmott)\nArgent(giovanna)\nforall x (Abut(x, jessee) and Crew(jessee, giovanna) -> not Crew(x, jessee))\nforall x (Seamanly(x) and Analyse(x, giovanna) -> Crew(x, willmott))\nforall x (Abut(x, jessee) -> not Monarchal(jessee))\nforall x (Seamanly(x) -> Analyse(x, giovanna))\nAnalyse(willmott, ardis) and Monarchal(ardis) -> Abut(willmott, giovanna)\nforall x (Abut(x, giovanna) -> Argent(giovanna))\nnot Terminal(giovanna) -> Crew(giovanna, jessee)\nnot Analyse(ardis, giovanna) -> not Crew(giovanna, willmott)\n\nnot Seamanly(ardis)\n\nnot Seamanly(ardis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "The tirrell is marine. The sybille outstay the jennilee. The darcey is not vested. The jennilee is vested. If something outstay the tirrell and the tirrell codify the jennilee then it does not see the tirrell. If something is marine and it cater the jennilee then it codify the darcey. If something outstay the tirrell then the tirrell is not newborn. If something is marine then it cater the jennilee. If the darcey cater the sybille and the sybille is newborn then the darcey outstay the jennilee. If something outstay the jennilee then the jennilee is vested. If the jennilee is not indonesian then the jennilee codify the tirrell. If the sybille does not visit the jennilee then the jennilee does not see the darcey. The jennilee is indonesian.", "logic": "\nMarine(tirrell)\nOutstay(sybille, jennilee)\nnot Vested(darcey)\nVested(jennilee)\nforall x (Outstay(x, tirrell) and Codify(tirrell, jennilee) -> not Codify(x, tirrell))\nforall x (Marine(x) and Cater(x, jennilee) -> Codify(x, darcey))\nforall x (Outstay(x, tirrell) -> not Newborn(tirrell))\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Cater(x, jennilee))\nCater(darcey, sybille) and Newborn(sybille) -> Outstay(darcey, jennilee)\nforall x (Outstay(x, jennilee) -> Vested(jennilee))\nnot Indonesian(jennilee) -> Codify(jennilee, tirrell)\nnot Cater(sybille, jennilee) -> not Codify(jennilee, darcey)\n\nIndonesian(jennilee)\n\nIndonesian(jennilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1123"} {"premises": "Irina is euclidian. All euclidian things are backhanded. If something is gambian and unbeknown then it is sagacious. If something is gambian and unbeknown then it is intricate. If Irina is sagacious then Irina is euclidian. Rough, euclidian things are gambian. All unbeknown things are gambian. If Irina is intricate then Irina is gambian. All intricate, euclidian things are gambian. Irina is euclidian.", "logic": "\nEuclidian(irina)\nforall x (Euclidian(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) and Unbeknown(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) and Unbeknown(x) -> Intricate(x))\nSagacious(irina) -> Euclidian(irina)\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Euclidian(x) -> Gambian(x))\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) -> Gambian(x))\nIntricate(irina) -> Gambian(irina)\nforall x (Intricate(x) and Euclidian(x) -> Gambian(x))\n\nEuclidian(irina)\n\ntherefore Euclidian(irina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Thorsten is separable. All separable things are tetragonal. If something is genealogic and cardboard then it is xanthous. If something is genealogic and cardboard then it is ripping. If Thorsten is xanthous then Thorsten is separable. Rough, separable things are genealogic. All cardboard things are genealogic. If Thorsten is ripping then Thorsten is genealogic. All ripping, separable things are genealogic. Thorsten is not separable.", "logic": "\nSeparable(thorsten)\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Genealogic(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Genealogic(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Ripping(x))\nXanthous(thorsten) -> Separable(thorsten)\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and Separable(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nforall x (Cardboard(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nRipping(thorsten) -> Genealogic(thorsten)\nforall x (Ripping(x) and Separable(x) -> Genealogic(x))\n\nnot Separable(thorsten)\n\ntherefore Separable(thorsten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Haleigh is merging. All merging things are housebound. If something is deadened and raucous then it is lone. If something is deadened and raucous then it is inside. If Haleigh is lone then Haleigh is merging. Rough, merging things are deadened. All raucous things are deadened. If Haleigh is inside then Haleigh is deadened. All inside, merging things are deadened. Haleigh is housebound.", "logic": "\nMerging(haleigh)\nforall x (Merging(x) -> Housebound(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) and Raucous(x) -> Lone(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) and Raucous(x) -> Inside(x))\nLone(haleigh) -> Merging(haleigh)\nforall x (Housebound(x) and Merging(x) -> Deadened(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) -> Deadened(x))\nInside(haleigh) -> Deadened(haleigh)\nforall x (Inside(x) and Merging(x) -> Deadened(x))\n\nHousebound(haleigh)\n\nMerging(haleigh) and forall x (Merging(x) -> Housebound(x)) -> therefore Housebound(haleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Angela is juristic. All juristic things are surging. If something is apsidal and removable then it is offended. If something is apsidal and removable then it is reclusive. If Angela is offended then Angela is juristic. Rough, juristic things are apsidal. All removable things are apsidal. If Angela is reclusive then Angela is apsidal. All reclusive, juristic things are apsidal. Angela is not surging.", "logic": "\nJuristic(angela)\nforall x (Juristic(x) -> Surging(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and Removable(x) -> Offended(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and Removable(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nOffended(angela) -> Juristic(angela)\nforall x (Surging(x) and Juristic(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nReclusive(angela) -> Apsidal(angela)\nforall x (Reclusive(x) and Juristic(x) -> Apsidal(x))\n\nnot Surging(angela)\n\nJuristic(angela) and forall x (Juristic(x) -> Surging(x)) -> therefore Surging(angela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Sparky is agone. All agone things are overage. If something is thirdhand and worshipful then it is victorious. If something is thirdhand and worshipful then it is slapstick. If Sparky is victorious then Sparky is agone. Rough, agone things are thirdhand. All worshipful things are thirdhand. If Sparky is slapstick then Sparky is thirdhand. All slapstick, agone things are thirdhand. Sparky is thirdhand.", "logic": "\nAgone(sparky)\nforall x (Agone(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) and Worshipful(x) -> Victorious(x))\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) and Worshipful(x) -> Slapstick(x))\nVictorious(sparky) -> Agone(sparky)\nforall x (Overage(x) and Agone(x) -> Thirdhand(x))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Thirdhand(x))\nSlapstick(sparky) -> Thirdhand(sparky)\nforall x (Slapstick(x) and Agone(x) -> Thirdhand(x))\n\nThirdhand(sparky)\n\nAgone(sparky) and forall x (Agone(x) -> Overage(x)) -> therefore Overage(sparky) Overage(sparky) and Agone(sparky) and forall x (Overage(x) and Agone(x) -> Thirdhand(x)) -> therefore Thirdhand(sparky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Oren is fibrinous. All fibrinous things are thirteen. If something is staunch and tetragonal then it is ruritanian. If something is staunch and tetragonal then it is maculate. If Oren is ruritanian then Oren is fibrinous. Rough, fibrinous things are staunch. All tetragonal things are staunch. If Oren is maculate then Oren is staunch. All maculate, fibrinous things are staunch. Oren is not staunch.", "logic": "\nFibrinous(oren)\nforall x (Fibrinous(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Tetragonal(x) -> Ruritanian(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Tetragonal(x) -> Maculate(x))\nRuritanian(oren) -> Fibrinous(oren)\nforall x (Thirteen(x) and Fibrinous(x) -> Staunch(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) -> Staunch(x))\nMaculate(oren) -> Staunch(oren)\nforall x (Maculate(x) and Fibrinous(x) -> Staunch(x))\n\nnot Staunch(oren)\n\nFibrinous(oren) and forall x (Fibrinous(x) -> Thirteen(x)) -> therefore Thirteen(oren) Thirteen(oren) and Fibrinous(oren) and forall x (Thirteen(x) and Fibrinous(x) -> Staunch(x)) -> therefore Staunch(oren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Cathi is demure. All demure things are subsequent. If something is champion and fervent then it is ankylotic. If something is champion and fervent then it is donatist. If Cathi is ankylotic then Cathi is demure. Rough, demure things are champion. All fervent things are champion. If Cathi is donatist then Cathi is champion. All donatist, demure things are champion. Cathi is not ankylotic.", "logic": "\nDemure(cathi)\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Champion(x) and Fervent(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\nforall x (Champion(x) and Fervent(x) -> Donatist(x))\nAnkylotic(cathi) -> Demure(cathi)\nforall x (Subsequent(x) and Demure(x) -> Champion(x))\nforall x (Fervent(x) -> Champion(x))\nDonatist(cathi) -> Champion(cathi)\nforall x (Donatist(x) and Demure(x) -> Champion(x))\n\nnot Ankylotic(cathi)\n\nforall x (Champion(x) and Fervent(x) -> Ankylotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Violante is lumbar. All lumbar things are erect. If something is redemptive and wound then it is alphabetic. If something is redemptive and wound then it is unfair. If Violante is alphabetic then Violante is lumbar. Rough, lumbar things are redemptive. All wound things are redemptive. If Violante is unfair then Violante is redemptive. All unfair, lumbar things are redemptive. Violante is unfair.", "logic": "\nLumbar(violante)\nforall x (Lumbar(x) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Redemptive(x) and Wound(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Redemptive(x) and Wound(x) -> Unfair(x))\nAlphabetic(violante) -> Lumbar(violante)\nforall x (Erect(x) and Lumbar(x) -> Redemptive(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Redemptive(x))\nUnfair(violante) -> Redemptive(violante)\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Lumbar(x) -> Redemptive(x))\n\nUnfair(violante)\n\nforall x (Redemptive(x) and Wound(x) -> Unfair(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Broderick is shrunken. All shrunken things are unclean. If something is amuck and nappy then it is woolly. If something is amuck and nappy then it is utilised. If Broderick is woolly then Broderick is shrunken. Rough, shrunken things are amuck. All nappy things are amuck. If Broderick is utilised then Broderick is amuck. All utilised, shrunken things are amuck. Broderick is not nappy.", "logic": "\nShrunken(broderick)\nforall x (Shrunken(x) -> Unclean(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) and Nappy(x) -> Woolly(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) and Nappy(x) -> Utilised(x))\nWoolly(broderick) -> Shrunken(broderick)\nforall x (Unclean(x) and Shrunken(x) -> Amuck(x))\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Amuck(x))\nUtilised(broderick) -> Amuck(broderick)\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Shrunken(x) -> Amuck(x))\n\nnot Nappy(broderick)\n\nnot Nappy(broderick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Tomiko is annalistic. All annalistic things are brickly. If something is tearful and detectable then it is waterworn. If something is tearful and detectable then it is pretty. If Tomiko is waterworn then Tomiko is annalistic. Rough, annalistic things are tearful. All detectable things are tearful. If Tomiko is pretty then Tomiko is tearful. All pretty, annalistic things are tearful. Tomiko is smart.", "logic": "\nAnnalistic(tomiko)\nforall x (Annalistic(x) -> Brickly(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) and Detectable(x) -> Waterworn(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) and Detectable(x) -> Pretty(x))\nWaterworn(tomiko) -> Annalistic(tomiko)\nforall x (Brickly(x) and Annalistic(x) -> Tearful(x))\nforall x (Detectable(x) -> Tearful(x))\nPretty(tomiko) -> Tearful(tomiko)\nforall x (Pretty(x) and Annalistic(x) -> Tearful(x))\n\nSmart(tomiko)\n\nSmart(tomiko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "Neville is bestubbled. Neville is exploited. Neville is sylvan. If Neville is creedal then Neville is bestubbled. All allocable, baked people are not bestubbled. Blue people are not allocable. All baked people are anorthic. Young people are not creedal. If Neville is sylvan and Neville is bestubbled then Neville is baked. Neville is sylvan.", "logic": "\nBestubbled(neville)\nExploited(neville)\nSylvan(neville)\nCreedal(neville) -> Bestubbled(neville)\nforall x (Allocable(x) and Baked(x) -> not Bestubbled(x))\nforall x (Creedal(x) -> not Allocable(x))\nforall x (Baked(x) -> Anorthic(x))\nforall x (Baked(x) -> not Creedal(x))\nSylvan(neville) and Bestubbled(neville) -> Baked(neville)\n\nSylvan(neville)\n\ntherefore Sylvan(neville)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-743"} {"premises": "Kris is yeatsian. Kris is alluring. Kris is motionless. If Kris is agrologic then Kris is yeatsian. All hydroponic, nonviable people are not yeatsian. Blue people are not hydroponic. All nonviable people are abrasive. Young people are not agrologic. If Kris is motionless and Kris is yeatsian then Kris is nonviable. Kris is not alluring.", "logic": "\nYeatsian(kris)\nAlluring(kris)\nMotionless(kris)\nAgrologic(kris) -> Yeatsian(kris)\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) and Nonviable(x) -> not Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Agrologic(x) -> not Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) -> Abrasive(x))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) -> not Agrologic(x))\nMotionless(kris) and Yeatsian(kris) -> Nonviable(kris)\n\nnot Alluring(kris)\n\ntherefore Alluring(kris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-743"} {"premises": "Frederich is harnessed. Frederich is unlicenced. Frederich is razed. If Frederich is wraithlike then Frederich is harnessed. All finished, unchecked people are not harnessed. Blue people are not finished. All unchecked people are abscessed. Young people are not wraithlike. If Frederich is razed and Frederich is harnessed then Frederich is unchecked. Frederich is unchecked.", "logic": "\nHarnessed(frederich)\nUnlicenced(frederich)\nRazed(frederich)\nWraithlike(frederich) -> Harnessed(frederich)\nforall x (Finished(x) and Unchecked(x) -> not Harnessed(x))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) -> not Finished(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) -> not Wraithlike(x))\nRazed(frederich) and Harnessed(frederich) -> Unchecked(frederich)\n\nUnchecked(frederich)\n\nRazed(frederich) and Harnessed(frederich) and Razed(frederich) and Harnessed(frederich) -> Unchecked(frederich) -> therefore Unchecked(frederich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-743"} {"premises": "Paul is unapparent. Paul is squeezable. Paul is unclogged. If Paul is humoral then Paul is unapparent. All abrasive, abdicable people are not unapparent. Blue people are not abrasive. All abdicable people are vivace. Young people are not humoral. If Paul is unclogged and Paul is unapparent then Paul is abdicable. Paul is not abdicable.", "logic": "\nUnapparent(paul)\nSqueezable(paul)\nUnclogged(paul)\nHumoral(paul) -> Unapparent(paul)\nforall x (Abrasive(x) and Abdicable(x) -> not Unapparent(x))\nforall x (Humoral(x) -> not Abrasive(x))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) -> Vivace(x))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) -> not Humoral(x))\nUnclogged(paul) and Unapparent(paul) -> Abdicable(paul)\n\nnot Abdicable(paul)\n\nUnclogged(paul) and Unapparent(paul) and Unclogged(paul) and Unapparent(paul) -> Abdicable(paul) -> therefore Abdicable(paul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-743"} {"premises": "Jeana is lusty. Jeana is beaming. Jeana is malthusian. If Jeana is humourous then Jeana is lusty. All obovate, afoot people are not lusty. Blue people are not obovate. All afoot people are hispanic. Young people are not humourous. If Jeana is malthusian and Jeana is lusty then Jeana is afoot. Jeana is not humourous.", "logic": "\nLusty(jeana)\nBeaming(jeana)\nMalthusian(jeana)\nHumourous(jeana) -> Lusty(jeana)\nforall x (Obovate(x) and Afoot(x) -> not Lusty(x))\nforall x (Humourous(x) -> not Obovate(x))\nforall x (Afoot(x) -> Hispanic(x))\nforall x (Afoot(x) -> not Humourous(x))\nMalthusian(jeana) and Lusty(jeana) -> Afoot(jeana)\n\nnot Humourous(jeana)\n\nMalthusian(jeana) and Lusty(jeana) and Malthusian(jeana) and Lusty(jeana) -> Afoot(jeana) -> therefore Afoot(jeana) Afoot(jeana) and forall x (Afoot(x) -> not Humourous(x)) -> therefore not Humourous(jeana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-743"} {"premises": "Jodi is touristy. Jodi is upcoming. Jodi is ahorse. If Jodi is clanging then Jodi is touristy. All uncleared, eastern people are not touristy. Blue people are not uncleared. All eastern people are bungled. Young people are not clanging. If Jodi is ahorse and Jodi is touristy then Jodi is eastern. Jodi is not bungled.", "logic": "\nTouristy(jodi)\nUpcoming(jodi)\nAhorse(jodi)\nClanging(jodi) -> Touristy(jodi)\nforall x (Uncleared(x) and Eastern(x) -> not Touristy(x))\nforall x (Clanging(x) -> not Uncleared(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) -> Bungled(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) -> not Clanging(x))\nAhorse(jodi) and Touristy(jodi) -> Eastern(jodi)\n\nnot Bungled(jodi)\n\nAhorse(jodi) and Touristy(jodi) and Ahorse(jodi) and Touristy(jodi) -> Eastern(jodi) -> therefore Eastern(jodi) Eastern(jodi) and forall x (Eastern(x) -> Bungled(x)) -> therefore Bungled(jodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-743"} {"premises": "The ertha reconvert the rubetta. The ertha is aquatic. The ertha is not inducive. The ertha is lyrical. The ertha does not like the andromeda. The ertha rock the rubetta. The bennet reconvert the andromeda. The bennet is aquatic. The bennet concoct the andromeda. The andromeda is methodist. The andromeda is lyrical. The andromeda rock the rubetta. The andromeda concoct the rubetta. The rubetta does not eat the bennet. The rubetta rock the bennet. If something concoct the bennet then it is inducive. If something reconvert the ertha then the ertha reconvert the bennet. If something is sculptural then it does not like the rubetta. If something rock the ertha and it does not eat the andromeda then the andromeda rock the ertha. If something reconvert the ertha then it is methodist. If something concoct the ertha then it is not aquatic. If something reconvert the bennet and it is not inducive then the bennet concoct the rubetta. If something concoct the rubetta then the rubetta concoct the ertha. The ertha rock the rubetta.", "logic": "\nReconvert(ertha, rubetta)\nAquatic(ertha)\nnot Inducive(ertha)\nLyrical(ertha)\nnot Rock(ertha, andromeda)\nRock(ertha, rubetta)\nReconvert(bennet, andromeda)\nAquatic(bennet)\nConcoct(bennet, andromeda)\nMethodist(andromeda)\nLyrical(andromeda)\nRock(andromeda, rubetta)\nConcoct(andromeda, rubetta)\nnot Reconvert(rubetta, bennet)\nRock(rubetta, bennet)\nforall x (Concoct(x, bennet) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Reconvert(x, ertha) -> Reconvert(ertha, bennet))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) -> not Rock(x, rubetta))\nforall x (Rock(x, ertha) and not Reconvert(x, andromeda) -> Rock(andromeda, ertha))\nforall x (Reconvert(x, ertha) -> Methodist(x))\nforall x (Concoct(x, ertha) -> not Aquatic(x))\nforall x (Reconvert(x, bennet) and not Inducive(x) -> Concoct(bennet, rubetta))\nforall x (Concoct(x, rubetta) -> Concoct(rubetta, ertha))\n\nRock(ertha, rubetta)\n\ntherefore Rock(ertha, rubetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The valerye have the damara. The valerye is soulless. The valerye is not plumbous. The valerye is downstream. The valerye does not like the stepha. The valerye scamp the damara. The renie have the stepha. The renie is soulless. The renie bribe the stepha. The stepha is unwavering. The stepha is downstream. The stepha scamp the damara. The stepha bribe the damara. The damara does not eat the renie. The damara scamp the renie. If something bribe the renie then it is plumbous. If something have the valerye then the valerye have the renie. If something is cyrillic then it does not like the damara. If something scamp the valerye and it does not eat the stepha then the stepha scamp the valerye. If something have the valerye then it is unwavering. If something bribe the valerye then it is not soulless. If something have the renie and it is not plumbous then the renie bribe the damara. If something bribe the damara then the damara bribe the valerye. The valerye does not eat the damara.", "logic": "\nHave(valerye, damara)\nSoulless(valerye)\nnot Plumbous(valerye)\nDownstream(valerye)\nnot Scamp(valerye, stepha)\nScamp(valerye, damara)\nHave(renie, stepha)\nSoulless(renie)\nBribe(renie, stepha)\nUnwavering(stepha)\nDownstream(stepha)\nScamp(stepha, damara)\nBribe(stepha, damara)\nnot Have(damara, renie)\nScamp(damara, renie)\nforall x (Bribe(x, renie) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Have(x, valerye) -> Have(valerye, renie))\nforall x (Cyrillic(x) -> not Scamp(x, damara))\nforall x (Scamp(x, valerye) and not Have(x, stepha) -> Scamp(stepha, valerye))\nforall x (Have(x, valerye) -> Unwavering(x))\nforall x (Bribe(x, valerye) -> not Soulless(x))\nforall x (Have(x, renie) and not Plumbous(x) -> Bribe(renie, damara))\nforall x (Bribe(x, damara) -> Bribe(damara, valerye))\n\nnot Have(valerye, damara)\n\ntherefore Have(valerye, damara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The ulick sulfate the inesita. The ulick is crippled. The ulick is not anxiolytic. The ulick is agitating. The ulick does not like the judie. The ulick lust the inesita. The sheilah sulfate the judie. The sheilah is crippled. The sheilah welt the judie. The judie is eolithic. The judie is agitating. The judie lust the inesita. The judie welt the inesita. The inesita does not eat the sheilah. The inesita lust the sheilah. If something welt the sheilah then it is anxiolytic. If something sulfate the ulick then the ulick sulfate the sheilah. If something is upbeat then it does not like the inesita. If something lust the ulick and it does not eat the judie then the judie lust the ulick. If something sulfate the ulick then it is eolithic. If something welt the ulick then it is not crippled. If something sulfate the sheilah and it is not anxiolytic then the sheilah welt the inesita. If something welt the inesita then the inesita welt the ulick. The inesita welt the ulick.", "logic": "\nSulfate(ulick, inesita)\nCrippled(ulick)\nnot Anxiolytic(ulick)\nAgitating(ulick)\nnot Lust(ulick, judie)\nLust(ulick, inesita)\nSulfate(sheilah, judie)\nCrippled(sheilah)\nWelt(sheilah, judie)\nEolithic(judie)\nAgitating(judie)\nLust(judie, inesita)\nWelt(judie, inesita)\nnot Sulfate(inesita, sheilah)\nLust(inesita, sheilah)\nforall x (Welt(x, sheilah) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, ulick) -> Sulfate(ulick, sheilah))\nforall x (Upbeat(x) -> not Lust(x, inesita))\nforall x (Lust(x, ulick) and not Sulfate(x, judie) -> Lust(judie, ulick))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, ulick) -> Eolithic(x))\nforall x (Welt(x, ulick) -> not Crippled(x))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, sheilah) and not Anxiolytic(x) -> Welt(sheilah, inesita))\nforall x (Welt(x, inesita) -> Welt(inesita, ulick))\n\nWelt(inesita, ulick)\n\nWelt(judie, inesita) and forall x (Welt(x, inesita) -> Welt(inesita, ulick)) -> therefore Welt(inesita, ulick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The nerte depilate the clarissa. The nerte is pneumatic. The nerte is not fused. The nerte is trifoliate. The nerte does not like the anissa. The nerte formicate the clarissa. The quillan depilate the anissa. The quillan is pneumatic. The quillan last the anissa. The anissa is fooling. The anissa is trifoliate. The anissa formicate the clarissa. The anissa last the clarissa. The clarissa does not eat the quillan. The clarissa formicate the quillan. If something last the quillan then it is fused. If something depilate the nerte then the nerte depilate the quillan. If something is taxable then it does not like the clarissa. If something formicate the nerte and it does not eat the anissa then the anissa formicate the nerte. If something depilate the nerte then it is fooling. If something last the nerte then it is not pneumatic. If something depilate the quillan and it is not fused then the quillan last the clarissa. If something last the clarissa then the clarissa last the nerte. The clarissa does not see the nerte.", "logic": "\nDepilate(nerte, clarissa)\nPneumatic(nerte)\nnot Fused(nerte)\nTrifoliate(nerte)\nnot Formicate(nerte, anissa)\nFormicate(nerte, clarissa)\nDepilate(quillan, anissa)\nPneumatic(quillan)\nLast(quillan, anissa)\nFooling(anissa)\nTrifoliate(anissa)\nFormicate(anissa, clarissa)\nLast(anissa, clarissa)\nnot Depilate(clarissa, quillan)\nFormicate(clarissa, quillan)\nforall x (Last(x, quillan) -> Fused(x))\nforall x (Depilate(x, nerte) -> Depilate(nerte, quillan))\nforall x (Taxable(x) -> not Formicate(x, clarissa))\nforall x (Formicate(x, nerte) and not Depilate(x, anissa) -> Formicate(anissa, nerte))\nforall x (Depilate(x, nerte) -> Fooling(x))\nforall x (Last(x, nerte) -> not Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Depilate(x, quillan) and not Fused(x) -> Last(quillan, clarissa))\nforall x (Last(x, clarissa) -> Last(clarissa, nerte))\n\nnot Last(clarissa, nerte)\n\nLast(anissa, clarissa) and forall x (Last(x, clarissa) -> Last(clarissa, nerte)) -> therefore Last(clarissa, nerte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The kendal counter the delora. The kendal is repayable. The kendal is not youthful. The kendal is inexpert. The kendal does not like the carrissa. The kendal reenact the delora. The katrinka counter the carrissa. The katrinka is repayable. The katrinka plumb the carrissa. The carrissa is senatorial. The carrissa is inexpert. The carrissa reenact the delora. The carrissa plumb the delora. The delora does not eat the katrinka. The delora reenact the katrinka. If something plumb the katrinka then it is youthful. If something counter the kendal then the kendal counter the katrinka. If something is definite then it does not like the delora. If something reenact the kendal and it does not eat the carrissa then the carrissa reenact the kendal. If something counter the kendal then it is senatorial. If something plumb the kendal then it is not repayable. If something counter the katrinka and it is not youthful then the katrinka plumb the delora. If something plumb the delora then the delora plumb the kendal. The delora is not repayable.", "logic": "\nCounter(kendal, delora)\nRepayable(kendal)\nnot Youthful(kendal)\nInexpert(kendal)\nnot Reenact(kendal, carrissa)\nReenact(kendal, delora)\nCounter(katrinka, carrissa)\nRepayable(katrinka)\nPlumb(katrinka, carrissa)\nSenatorial(carrissa)\nInexpert(carrissa)\nReenact(carrissa, delora)\nPlumb(carrissa, delora)\nnot Counter(delora, katrinka)\nReenact(delora, katrinka)\nforall x (Plumb(x, katrinka) -> Youthful(x))\nforall x (Counter(x, kendal) -> Counter(kendal, katrinka))\nforall x (Definite(x) -> not Reenact(x, delora))\nforall x (Reenact(x, kendal) and not Counter(x, carrissa) -> Reenact(carrissa, kendal))\nforall x (Counter(x, kendal) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Plumb(x, kendal) -> not Repayable(x))\nforall x (Counter(x, katrinka) and not Youthful(x) -> Plumb(katrinka, delora))\nforall x (Plumb(x, delora) -> Plumb(delora, kendal))\n\nnot Repayable(delora)\n\nPlumb(carrissa, delora) and forall x (Plumb(x, delora) -> Plumb(delora, kendal)) -> therefore Plumb(delora, kendal) Plumb(delora, kendal) and forall x (Plumb(x, kendal) -> not Repayable(x)) -> therefore not Repayable(delora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The beaufort loft the spense. The beaufort is motorless. The beaufort is not protective. The beaufort is utilised. The beaufort does not like the carlita. The beaufort congee the spense. The megen loft the carlita. The megen is motorless. The megen homogenise the carlita. The carlita is hornless. The carlita is utilised. The carlita congee the spense. The carlita homogenise the spense. The spense does not eat the megen. The spense congee the megen. If something homogenise the megen then it is protective. If something loft the beaufort then the beaufort loft the megen. If something is unpaid then it does not like the spense. If something congee the beaufort and it does not eat the carlita then the carlita congee the beaufort. If something loft the beaufort then it is hornless. If something homogenise the beaufort then it is not motorless. If something loft the megen and it is not protective then the megen homogenise the spense. If something homogenise the spense then the spense homogenise the beaufort. The spense is motorless.", "logic": "\nLoft(beaufort, spense)\nMotorless(beaufort)\nnot Protective(beaufort)\nUtilised(beaufort)\nnot Congee(beaufort, carlita)\nCongee(beaufort, spense)\nLoft(megen, carlita)\nMotorless(megen)\nHomogenise(megen, carlita)\nHornless(carlita)\nUtilised(carlita)\nCongee(carlita, spense)\nHomogenise(carlita, spense)\nnot Loft(spense, megen)\nCongee(spense, megen)\nforall x (Homogenise(x, megen) -> Protective(x))\nforall x (Loft(x, beaufort) -> Loft(beaufort, megen))\nforall x (Unpaid(x) -> not Congee(x, spense))\nforall x (Congee(x, beaufort) and not Loft(x, carlita) -> Congee(carlita, beaufort))\nforall x (Loft(x, beaufort) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Homogenise(x, beaufort) -> not Motorless(x))\nforall x (Loft(x, megen) and not Protective(x) -> Homogenise(megen, spense))\nforall x (Homogenise(x, spense) -> Homogenise(spense, beaufort))\n\nMotorless(spense)\n\nHomogenise(carlita, spense) and forall x (Homogenise(x, spense) -> Homogenise(spense, beaufort)) -> therefore Homogenise(spense, beaufort) Homogenise(spense, beaufort) and forall x (Homogenise(x, beaufort) -> not Motorless(x)) -> therefore not Motorless(spense)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The jotham retrospect the jeniece. The jotham is untreated. The jotham is not untainted. The jotham is impeccable. The jotham does not like the mireielle. The jotham redeposit the jeniece. The karil retrospect the mireielle. The karil is untreated. The karil entrust the mireielle. The mireielle is snuffly. The mireielle is impeccable. The mireielle redeposit the jeniece. The mireielle entrust the jeniece. The jeniece does not eat the karil. The jeniece redeposit the karil. If something entrust the karil then it is untainted. If something retrospect the jotham then the jotham retrospect the karil. If something is impassive then it does not like the jeniece. If something redeposit the jotham and it does not eat the mireielle then the mireielle redeposit the jotham. If something retrospect the jotham then it is snuffly. If something entrust the jotham then it is not untreated. If something retrospect the karil and it is not untainted then the karil entrust the jeniece. If something entrust the jeniece then the jeniece entrust the jotham. The mireielle is not untainted.", "logic": "\nRetrospect(jotham, jeniece)\nUntreated(jotham)\nnot Untainted(jotham)\nImpeccable(jotham)\nnot Redeposit(jotham, mireielle)\nRedeposit(jotham, jeniece)\nRetrospect(karil, mireielle)\nUntreated(karil)\nEntrust(karil, mireielle)\nSnuffly(mireielle)\nImpeccable(mireielle)\nRedeposit(mireielle, jeniece)\nEntrust(mireielle, jeniece)\nnot Retrospect(jeniece, karil)\nRedeposit(jeniece, karil)\nforall x (Entrust(x, karil) -> Untainted(x))\nforall x (Retrospect(x, jotham) -> Retrospect(jotham, karil))\nforall x (Impassive(x) -> not Redeposit(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Redeposit(x, jotham) and not Retrospect(x, mireielle) -> Redeposit(mireielle, jotham))\nforall x (Retrospect(x, jotham) -> Snuffly(x))\nforall x (Entrust(x, jotham) -> not Untreated(x))\nforall x (Retrospect(x, karil) and not Untainted(x) -> Entrust(karil, jeniece))\nforall x (Entrust(x, jeniece) -> Entrust(jeniece, jotham))\n\nnot Untainted(mireielle)\n\nforall x (Entrust(x, karil) -> Untainted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The ardath ginger the merrile. The ardath is express. The ardath is not hornless. The ardath is deranged. The ardath does not like the jethro. The ardath capitalize the merrile. The libby ginger the jethro. The libby is express. The libby colour the jethro. The jethro is circinate. The jethro is deranged. The jethro capitalize the merrile. The jethro colour the merrile. The merrile does not eat the libby. The merrile capitalize the libby. If something colour the libby then it is hornless. If something ginger the ardath then the ardath ginger the libby. If something is according then it does not like the merrile. If something capitalize the ardath and it does not eat the jethro then the jethro capitalize the ardath. If something ginger the ardath then it is circinate. If something colour the ardath then it is not express. If something ginger the libby and it is not hornless then the libby colour the merrile. If something colour the merrile then the merrile colour the ardath. The merrile is hornless.", "logic": "\nGinger(ardath, merrile)\nExpress(ardath)\nnot Hornless(ardath)\nDeranged(ardath)\nnot Capitalize(ardath, jethro)\nCapitalize(ardath, merrile)\nGinger(libby, jethro)\nExpress(libby)\nColour(libby, jethro)\nCircinate(jethro)\nDeranged(jethro)\nCapitalize(jethro, merrile)\nColour(jethro, merrile)\nnot Ginger(merrile, libby)\nCapitalize(merrile, libby)\nforall x (Colour(x, libby) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Ginger(x, ardath) -> Ginger(ardath, libby))\nforall x (According(x) -> not Capitalize(x, merrile))\nforall x (Capitalize(x, ardath) and not Ginger(x, jethro) -> Capitalize(jethro, ardath))\nforall x (Ginger(x, ardath) -> Circinate(x))\nforall x (Colour(x, ardath) -> not Express(x))\nforall x (Ginger(x, libby) and not Hornless(x) -> Colour(libby, merrile))\nforall x (Colour(x, merrile) -> Colour(merrile, ardath))\n\nHornless(merrile)\n\nforall x (Colour(x, libby) -> Hornless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The freida burl the arther. The freida is gilded. The freida is not axial. The freida is amethyst. The freida does not like the laraine. The freida babble the arther. The cari burl the laraine. The cari is gilded. The cari yellow the laraine. The laraine is unattached. The laraine is amethyst. The laraine babble the arther. The laraine yellow the arther. The arther does not eat the cari. The arther babble the cari. If something yellow the cari then it is axial. If something burl the freida then the freida burl the cari. If something is lxxx then it does not like the arther. If something babble the freida and it does not eat the laraine then the laraine babble the freida. If something burl the freida then it is unattached. If something yellow the freida then it is not gilded. If something burl the cari and it is not axial then the cari yellow the arther. If something yellow the arther then the arther yellow the freida. The cari is not axial.", "logic": "\nBurl(freida, arther)\nGilded(freida)\nnot Axial(freida)\nAmethyst(freida)\nnot Babble(freida, laraine)\nBabble(freida, arther)\nBurl(cari, laraine)\nGilded(cari)\nYellow(cari, laraine)\nUnattached(laraine)\nAmethyst(laraine)\nBabble(laraine, arther)\nYellow(laraine, arther)\nnot Burl(arther, cari)\nBabble(arther, cari)\nforall x (Yellow(x, cari) -> Axial(x))\nforall x (Burl(x, freida) -> Burl(freida, cari))\nforall x (Lxxx(x) -> not Babble(x, arther))\nforall x (Babble(x, freida) and not Burl(x, laraine) -> Babble(laraine, freida))\nforall x (Burl(x, freida) -> Unattached(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x, freida) -> not Gilded(x))\nforall x (Burl(x, cari) and not Axial(x) -> Yellow(cari, arther))\nforall x (Yellow(x, arther) -> Yellow(arther, freida))\n\nnot Axial(cari)\n\nforall x (Yellow(x, cari) -> Axial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The yardley warehouse the lila. The yardley is surficial. The yardley is not diestrual. The yardley is gibbous. The yardley does not like the clive. The yardley whiteout the lila. The dasie warehouse the clive. The dasie is surficial. The dasie hoover the clive. The clive is condign. The clive is gibbous. The clive whiteout the lila. The clive hoover the lila. The lila does not eat the dasie. The lila whiteout the dasie. If something hoover the dasie then it is diestrual. If something warehouse the yardley then the yardley warehouse the dasie. If something is gymnastic then it does not like the lila. If something whiteout the yardley and it does not eat the clive then the clive whiteout the yardley. If something warehouse the yardley then it is condign. If something hoover the yardley then it is not surficial. If something warehouse the dasie and it is not diestrual then the dasie hoover the lila. If something hoover the lila then the lila hoover the yardley. The lila is gibbous.", "logic": "\nWarehouse(yardley, lila)\nSurficial(yardley)\nnot Diestrual(yardley)\nGibbous(yardley)\nnot Whiteout(yardley, clive)\nWhiteout(yardley, lila)\nWarehouse(dasie, clive)\nSurficial(dasie)\nHoover(dasie, clive)\nCondign(clive)\nGibbous(clive)\nWhiteout(clive, lila)\nHoover(clive, lila)\nnot Warehouse(lila, dasie)\nWhiteout(lila, dasie)\nforall x (Hoover(x, dasie) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, yardley) -> Warehouse(yardley, dasie))\nforall x (Gymnastic(x) -> not Whiteout(x, lila))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, yardley) and not Warehouse(x, clive) -> Whiteout(clive, yardley))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, yardley) -> Condign(x))\nforall x (Hoover(x, yardley) -> not Surficial(x))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, dasie) and not Diestrual(x) -> Hoover(dasie, lila))\nforall x (Hoover(x, lila) -> Hoover(lila, yardley))\n\nGibbous(lila)\n\nGibbous(lila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The fonz church the theobald. The fonz is vegetal. The fonz is not unethical. The fonz is designing. The fonz does not like the rosabel. The fonz enable the theobald. The katey church the rosabel. The katey is vegetal. The katey broach the rosabel. The rosabel is vindicated. The rosabel is designing. The rosabel enable the theobald. The rosabel broach the theobald. The theobald does not eat the katey. The theobald enable the katey. If something broach the katey then it is unethical. If something church the fonz then the fonz church the katey. If something is obliged then it does not like the theobald. If something enable the fonz and it does not eat the rosabel then the rosabel enable the fonz. If something church the fonz then it is vindicated. If something broach the fonz then it is not vegetal. If something church the katey and it is not unethical then the katey broach the theobald. If something broach the theobald then the theobald broach the fonz. The fonz does not like the katey.", "logic": "\nChurch(fonz, theobald)\nVegetal(fonz)\nnot Unethical(fonz)\nDesigning(fonz)\nnot Enable(fonz, rosabel)\nEnable(fonz, theobald)\nChurch(katey, rosabel)\nVegetal(katey)\nBroach(katey, rosabel)\nVindicated(rosabel)\nDesigning(rosabel)\nEnable(rosabel, theobald)\nBroach(rosabel, theobald)\nnot Church(theobald, katey)\nEnable(theobald, katey)\nforall x (Broach(x, katey) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Church(x, fonz) -> Church(fonz, katey))\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> not Enable(x, theobald))\nforall x (Enable(x, fonz) and not Church(x, rosabel) -> Enable(rosabel, fonz))\nforall x (Church(x, fonz) -> Vindicated(x))\nforall x (Broach(x, fonz) -> not Vegetal(x))\nforall x (Church(x, katey) and not Unethical(x) -> Broach(katey, theobald))\nforall x (Broach(x, theobald) -> Broach(theobald, fonz))\n\nnot Enable(fonz, katey)\n\nnot Enable(fonz, katey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The georgia uncrate the llewellyn. The georgia is redbrick. The georgia is not doglike. The georgia is surly. The georgia does not like the nevil. The georgia dupe the llewellyn. The kayle uncrate the nevil. The kayle is redbrick. The kayle swob the nevil. The nevil is catenulate. The nevil is surly. The nevil dupe the llewellyn. The nevil swob the llewellyn. The llewellyn does not eat the kayle. The llewellyn dupe the kayle. If something swob the kayle then it is doglike. If something uncrate the georgia then the georgia uncrate the kayle. If something is baritone then it does not like the llewellyn. If something dupe the georgia and it does not eat the nevil then the nevil dupe the georgia. If something uncrate the georgia then it is catenulate. If something swob the georgia then it is not redbrick. If something uncrate the kayle and it is not doglike then the kayle swob the llewellyn. If something swob the llewellyn then the llewellyn swob the georgia. The nevil uncrate the llewellyn.", "logic": "\nUncrate(georgia, llewellyn)\nRedbrick(georgia)\nnot Doglike(georgia)\nSurly(georgia)\nnot Dupe(georgia, nevil)\nDupe(georgia, llewellyn)\nUncrate(kayle, nevil)\nRedbrick(kayle)\nSwob(kayle, nevil)\nCatenulate(nevil)\nSurly(nevil)\nDupe(nevil, llewellyn)\nSwob(nevil, llewellyn)\nnot Uncrate(llewellyn, kayle)\nDupe(llewellyn, kayle)\nforall x (Swob(x, kayle) -> Doglike(x))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, georgia) -> Uncrate(georgia, kayle))\nforall x (Baritone(x) -> not Dupe(x, llewellyn))\nforall x (Dupe(x, georgia) and not Uncrate(x, nevil) -> Dupe(nevil, georgia))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, georgia) -> Catenulate(x))\nforall x (Swob(x, georgia) -> not Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, kayle) and not Doglike(x) -> Swob(kayle, llewellyn))\nforall x (Swob(x, llewellyn) -> Swob(llewellyn, georgia))\n\nUncrate(nevil, llewellyn)\n\nUncrate(nevil, llewellyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "Christine is advective. Christine is nonlegal. Weslie is advective. All tweedy, nonlegal things are advective. If something is nonlegal then it is granitic. All flowering things are tweedy. If something is nonlegal and contrived then it is tweedy. Cold, contrived things are nonlegal. Nice things are contrived. If something is tweedy then it is nonlegal. All advective things are contrived. Christine is nonlegal.", "logic": "\nAdvective(christine)\nNonlegal(christine)\nAdvective(weslie)\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Nonlegal(x) -> Advective(x))\nforall x (Nonlegal(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Nonlegal(x) and Contrived(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Advective(x) and Contrived(x) -> Nonlegal(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Contrived(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Nonlegal(x))\nforall x (Advective(x) -> Contrived(x))\n\nNonlegal(christine)\n\ntherefore Nonlegal(christine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Taryn is lowbrowed. Taryn is sibilant. Fairfax is lowbrowed. All coaxing, sibilant things are lowbrowed. If something is sibilant then it is tilted. All fewer things are coaxing. If something is sibilant and three then it is coaxing. Cold, three things are sibilant. Nice things are three. If something is coaxing then it is sibilant. All lowbrowed things are three. Fairfax is not lowbrowed.", "logic": "\nLowbrowed(taryn)\nSibilant(taryn)\nLowbrowed(fairfax)\nforall x (Coaxing(x) and Sibilant(x) -> Lowbrowed(x))\nforall x (Sibilant(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Fewer(x) -> Coaxing(x))\nforall x (Sibilant(x) and Three(x) -> Coaxing(x))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) and Three(x) -> Sibilant(x))\nforall x (Coaxing(x) -> Three(x))\nforall x (Coaxing(x) -> Sibilant(x))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) -> Three(x))\n\nnot Lowbrowed(fairfax)\n\ntherefore Lowbrowed(fairfax)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Simonette is grave. Simonette is mundane. Arlena is grave. All unguarded, mundane things are grave. If something is mundane then it is contrary. All deserved things are unguarded. If something is mundane and quavering then it is unguarded. Cold, quavering things are mundane. Nice things are quavering. If something is unguarded then it is mundane. All grave things are quavering. Simonette is quavering.", "logic": "\nGrave(simonette)\nMundane(simonette)\nGrave(arlena)\nforall x (Unguarded(x) and Mundane(x) -> Grave(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) -> Contrary(x))\nforall x (Deserved(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) and Quavering(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) and Quavering(x) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Quavering(x))\n\nQuavering(simonette)\n\nGrave(simonette) and forall x (Grave(x) -> Quavering(x)) -> therefore Quavering(simonette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Cicily is envious. Cicily is tsarist. Jude is envious. All midi, tsarist things are envious. If something is tsarist then it is brachiate. All unstinting things are midi. If something is tsarist and ranging then it is midi. Cold, ranging things are tsarist. Nice things are ranging. If something is midi then it is tsarist. All envious things are ranging. Jude is not ranging.", "logic": "\nEnvious(cicily)\nTsarist(cicily)\nEnvious(jude)\nforall x (Midi(x) and Tsarist(x) -> Envious(x))\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Brachiate(x))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Midi(x))\nforall x (Tsarist(x) and Ranging(x) -> Midi(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) and Ranging(x) -> Tsarist(x))\nforall x (Midi(x) -> Ranging(x))\nforall x (Midi(x) -> Tsarist(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) -> Ranging(x))\n\nnot Ranging(jude)\n\nEnvious(jude) and forall x (Envious(x) -> Ranging(x)) -> therefore Ranging(jude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Lorna is ionized. Lorna is scornful. Noella is ionized. All plumbous, scornful things are ionized. If something is scornful then it is immiscible. All ribless things are plumbous. If something is scornful and pycnotic then it is plumbous. Cold, pycnotic things are scornful. Nice things are pycnotic. If something is plumbous then it is scornful. All ionized things are pycnotic. Noella is scornful.", "logic": "\nIonized(lorna)\nScornful(lorna)\nIonized(noella)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Scornful(x) -> Ionized(x))\nforall x (Scornful(x) -> Immiscible(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Scornful(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Scornful(x))\nforall x (Plumbous(x) -> Pycnotic(x))\nforall x (Plumbous(x) -> Scornful(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Pycnotic(x))\n\nScornful(noella)\n\nIonized(noella) and forall x (Ionized(x) -> Pycnotic(x)) -> therefore Pycnotic(noella) Ionized(noella) and Pycnotic(noella) and forall x (Ionized(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Scornful(x)) -> therefore Scornful(noella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Torrey is jittery. Torrey is splay. Basil is jittery. All cavitied, splay things are jittery. If something is splay then it is tuneless. All pendant things are cavitied. If something is splay and uppity then it is cavitied. Cold, uppity things are splay. Nice things are uppity. If something is cavitied then it is splay. All jittery things are uppity. Torrey is not cavitied.", "logic": "\nJittery(torrey)\nSplay(torrey)\nJittery(basil)\nforall x (Cavitied(x) and Splay(x) -> Jittery(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) and Uppity(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Jittery(x) and Uppity(x) -> Splay(x))\nforall x (Cavitied(x) -> Uppity(x))\nforall x (Cavitied(x) -> Splay(x))\nforall x (Jittery(x) -> Uppity(x))\n\nnot Cavitied(torrey)\n\nJittery(torrey) and forall x (Jittery(x) -> Uppity(x)) -> therefore Uppity(torrey) Splay(torrey) and Uppity(torrey) and forall x (Splay(x) and Uppity(x) -> Cavitied(x)) -> therefore Cavitied(torrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Gifford is ultimate. Gifford is flexile. Aphrodite is ultimate. All quavering, flexile things are ultimate. If something is flexile then it is suboceanic. All febrile things are quavering. If something is flexile and resentful then it is quavering. Cold, resentful things are flexile. Nice things are resentful. If something is quavering then it is flexile. All ultimate things are resentful. Aphrodite is not quiet.", "logic": "\nUltimate(gifford)\nFlexile(gifford)\nUltimate(aphrodite)\nforall x (Quavering(x) and Flexile(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Flexile(x) -> Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Febrile(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Flexile(x) and Resentful(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) and Resentful(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Quavering(x) -> Resentful(x))\nforall x (Quavering(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) -> Resentful(x))\n\nnot Quiet(aphrodite)\n\nnot Quiet(aphrodite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Adrianna is untold. Adrianna is banded. Flori is untold. All pugilistic, banded things are untold. If something is banded then it is acid. All interior things are pugilistic. If something is banded and surprised then it is pugilistic. Cold, surprised things are banded. Nice things are surprised. If something is pugilistic then it is banded. All untold things are surprised. Adrianna is quiet.", "logic": "\nUntold(adrianna)\nBanded(adrianna)\nUntold(flori)\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) and Banded(x) -> Untold(x))\nforall x (Banded(x) -> Acid(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Banded(x) and Surprised(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) and Surprised(x) -> Banded(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Banded(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Surprised(x))\n\nQuiet(adrianna)\n\nQuiet(adrianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Jerrilyn is biggish. Jerrilyn is announced. Patti is biggish. All axial, announced things are biggish. If something is announced then it is spiked. All mined things are axial. If something is announced and vicinal then it is axial. Cold, vicinal things are announced. Nice things are vicinal. If something is axial then it is announced. All biggish things are vicinal. Patti is not mined.", "logic": "\nBiggish(jerrilyn)\nAnnounced(jerrilyn)\nBiggish(patti)\nforall x (Axial(x) and Announced(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Announced(x) -> Spiked(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) -> Axial(x))\nforall x (Announced(x) and Vicinal(x) -> Axial(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) and Vicinal(x) -> Announced(x))\nforall x (Axial(x) -> Vicinal(x))\nforall x (Axial(x) -> Announced(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) -> Vicinal(x))\n\nnot Mined(patti)\n\nnot Mined(patti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "Linnell is ringleted. Linnell is included. Camille is ringleted. All placental, included things are ringleted. If something is included then it is wheezy. All kampuchean things are placental. If something is included and altaic then it is placental. Cold, altaic things are included. Nice things are altaic. If something is placental then it is included. All ringleted things are altaic. Linnell is kampuchean.", "logic": "\nRingleted(linnell)\nIncluded(linnell)\nRingleted(camille)\nforall x (Placental(x) and Included(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Included(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Placental(x))\nforall x (Included(x) and Altaic(x) -> Placental(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) and Altaic(x) -> Included(x))\nforall x (Placental(x) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Placental(x) -> Included(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) -> Altaic(x))\n\nKampuchean(linnell)\n\nKampuchean(linnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1645"} {"premises": "The marty is pareve. The marty is anisogamic. The marty embellish the gladis. The judie is not insolvable. The judie does not see the marty. The judie embellish the gladis. The judie microcopy the gladis. The gladis is alert. The gladis is insolvable. The gladis microcopy the marty. If something moulder the gladis then the gladis does not see the marty. If something is alert then it moulder the gladis. The gladis microcopy the marty.", "logic": "\nPareve(marty)\nAnisogamic(marty)\nEmbellish(marty, gladis)\nnot Insolvable(judie)\nnot Embellish(judie, marty)\nEmbellish(judie, gladis)\nMicrocopy(judie, gladis)\nAlert(gladis)\nInsolvable(gladis)\nMicrocopy(gladis, marty)\nforall x (Moulder(x, gladis) -> not Embellish(gladis, marty))\nforall x (Alert(x) -> Moulder(x, gladis))\n\nMicrocopy(gladis, marty)\n\ntherefore Microcopy(gladis, marty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The halie is muslim. The halie is pliant. The halie comprehend the darb. The gabriella is not judicial. The gabriella does not see the halie. The gabriella comprehend the darb. The gabriella envisage the darb. The darb is outdoorsy. The darb is judicial. The darb envisage the halie. If something jactitate the darb then the darb does not see the halie. If something is outdoorsy then it jactitate the darb. The darb does not visit the halie.", "logic": "\nMuslim(halie)\nPliant(halie)\nComprehend(halie, darb)\nnot Judicial(gabriella)\nnot Comprehend(gabriella, halie)\nComprehend(gabriella, darb)\nEnvisage(gabriella, darb)\nOutdoorsy(darb)\nJudicial(darb)\nEnvisage(darb, halie)\nforall x (Jactitate(x, darb) -> not Comprehend(darb, halie))\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) -> Jactitate(x, darb))\n\nnot Envisage(darb, halie)\n\ntherefore Envisage(darb, halie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The roz is estrous. The roz is lidded. The roz poach the mayer. The jolene is not overmodest. The jolene does not see the roz. The jolene poach the mayer. The jolene devastate the mayer. The mayer is spatulate. The mayer is overmodest. The mayer devastate the roz. If something display the mayer then the mayer does not see the roz. If something is spatulate then it display the mayer. The mayer display the mayer.", "logic": "\nEstrous(roz)\nLidded(roz)\nPoach(roz, mayer)\nnot Overmodest(jolene)\nnot Poach(jolene, roz)\nPoach(jolene, mayer)\nDevastate(jolene, mayer)\nSpatulate(mayer)\nOvermodest(mayer)\nDevastate(mayer, roz)\nforall x (Display(x, mayer) -> not Poach(mayer, roz))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Display(x, mayer))\n\nDisplay(mayer, mayer)\n\nSpatulate(mayer) and forall x (Spatulate(x) -> Display(x, mayer)) -> therefore Display(mayer, mayer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The weston is classified. The weston is aegean. The weston louden the jermaine. The wilden is not editorial. The wilden does not see the weston. The wilden louden the jermaine. The wilden overjoy the jermaine. The jermaine is unusual. The jermaine is editorial. The jermaine overjoy the weston. If something suspend the jermaine then the jermaine does not see the weston. If something is unusual then it suspend the jermaine. The jermaine does not chase the jermaine.", "logic": "\nClassified(weston)\nAegean(weston)\nLouden(weston, jermaine)\nnot Editorial(wilden)\nnot Louden(wilden, weston)\nLouden(wilden, jermaine)\nOverjoy(wilden, jermaine)\nUnusual(jermaine)\nEditorial(jermaine)\nOverjoy(jermaine, weston)\nforall x (Suspend(x, jermaine) -> not Louden(jermaine, weston))\nforall x (Unusual(x) -> Suspend(x, jermaine))\n\nnot Suspend(jermaine, jermaine)\n\nUnusual(jermaine) and forall x (Unusual(x) -> Suspend(x, jermaine)) -> therefore Suspend(jermaine, jermaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The vikky is padded. The vikky is sanitary. The vikky motorbike the stevana. The sal is not puissant. The sal does not see the vikky. The sal motorbike the stevana. The sal know the stevana. The stevana is backhand. The stevana is puissant. The stevana know the vikky. If something appall the stevana then the stevana does not see the vikky. If something is backhand then it appall the stevana. The stevana does not see the vikky.", "logic": "\nPadded(vikky)\nSanitary(vikky)\nMotorbike(vikky, stevana)\nnot Puissant(sal)\nnot Motorbike(sal, vikky)\nMotorbike(sal, stevana)\nKnow(sal, stevana)\nBackhand(stevana)\nPuissant(stevana)\nKnow(stevana, vikky)\nforall x (Appall(x, stevana) -> not Motorbike(stevana, vikky))\nforall x (Backhand(x) -> Appall(x, stevana))\n\nnot Motorbike(stevana, vikky)\n\nBackhand(stevana) and forall x (Backhand(x) -> Appall(x, stevana)) -> therefore Appall(stevana, stevana) Appall(stevana, stevana) and forall x (Appall(x, stevana) -> not Motorbike(stevana, vikky)) -> therefore not Motorbike(stevana, vikky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The guy is euclidian. The guy is lxxiv. The guy agnise the cora. The mac is not brickle. The mac does not see the guy. The mac agnise the cora. The mac bawl the cora. The cora is knowing. The cora is brickle. The cora bawl the guy. If something epoxy the cora then the cora does not see the guy. If something is knowing then it epoxy the cora. The cora agnise the guy.", "logic": "\nEuclidian(guy)\nLxxiv(guy)\nAgnise(guy, cora)\nnot Brickle(mac)\nnot Agnise(mac, guy)\nAgnise(mac, cora)\nBawl(mac, cora)\nKnowing(cora)\nBrickle(cora)\nBawl(cora, guy)\nforall x (Epoxy(x, cora) -> not Agnise(cora, guy))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Epoxy(x, cora))\n\nAgnise(cora, guy)\n\nKnowing(cora) and forall x (Knowing(x) -> Epoxy(x, cora)) -> therefore Epoxy(cora, cora) Epoxy(cora, cora) and forall x (Epoxy(x, cora) -> not Agnise(cora, guy)) -> therefore not Agnise(cora, guy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The sheree is colorectal. The sheree is planless. The sheree punish the magnum. The luella is not sacculate. The luella does not see the sheree. The luella punish the magnum. The luella beam the magnum. The magnum is detersive. The magnum is sacculate. The magnum beam the sheree. If something coif the magnum then the magnum does not see the sheree. If something is detersive then it coif the magnum. The luella does not chase the magnum.", "logic": "\nColorectal(sheree)\nPlanless(sheree)\nPunish(sheree, magnum)\nnot Sacculate(luella)\nnot Punish(luella, sheree)\nPunish(luella, magnum)\nBeam(luella, magnum)\nDetersive(magnum)\nSacculate(magnum)\nBeam(magnum, sheree)\nforall x (Coif(x, magnum) -> not Punish(magnum, sheree))\nforall x (Detersive(x) -> Coif(x, magnum))\n\nnot Coif(luella, magnum)\n\nforall x (Detersive(x) -> Coif(x, magnum)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The darby is churchly. The darby is anglican. The darby shoo the pammy. The janel is not alfresco. The janel does not see the darby. The janel shoo the pammy. The janel isomerise the pammy. The pammy is pleasing. The pammy is alfresco. The pammy isomerise the darby. If something mouth the pammy then the pammy does not see the darby. If something is pleasing then it mouth the pammy. The darby mouth the pammy.", "logic": "\nChurchly(darby)\nAnglican(darby)\nShoo(darby, pammy)\nnot Alfresco(janel)\nnot Shoo(janel, darby)\nShoo(janel, pammy)\nIsomerise(janel, pammy)\nPleasing(pammy)\nAlfresco(pammy)\nIsomerise(pammy, darby)\nforall x (Mouth(x, pammy) -> not Shoo(pammy, darby))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Mouth(x, pammy))\n\nMouth(darby, pammy)\n\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Mouth(x, pammy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The min is majuscular. The min is vicarial. The min needle the inglebert. The alix is not roiled. The alix does not see the min. The alix needle the inglebert. The alix ground the inglebert. The inglebert is wormy. The inglebert is roiled. The inglebert ground the min. If something monetise the inglebert then the inglebert does not see the min. If something is wormy then it monetise the inglebert. The inglebert does not chase the min.", "logic": "\nMajuscular(min)\nVicarial(min)\nNeedle(min, inglebert)\nnot Roiled(alix)\nnot Needle(alix, min)\nNeedle(alix, inglebert)\nGround(alix, inglebert)\nWormy(inglebert)\nRoiled(inglebert)\nGround(inglebert, min)\nforall x (Monetise(x, inglebert) -> not Needle(inglebert, min))\nforall x (Wormy(x) -> Monetise(x, inglebert))\n\nnot Monetise(inglebert, min)\n\nnot Monetise(inglebert, min) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The blaine is tattered. The blaine is fulgurant. The blaine fishtail the mart. The enrique is not mangled. The enrique does not see the blaine. The enrique fishtail the mart. The enrique coat the mart. The mart is thinned. The mart is mangled. The mart coat the blaine. If something moot the mart then the mart does not see the blaine. If something is thinned then it moot the mart. The blaine is thinned.", "logic": "\nTattered(blaine)\nFulgurant(blaine)\nFishtail(blaine, mart)\nnot Mangled(enrique)\nnot Fishtail(enrique, blaine)\nFishtail(enrique, mart)\nCoat(enrique, mart)\nThinned(mart)\nMangled(mart)\nCoat(mart, blaine)\nforall x (Moot(x, mart) -> not Fishtail(mart, blaine))\nforall x (Thinned(x) -> Moot(x, mart))\n\nThinned(blaine)\n\nThinned(blaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The willette is erect. The willette is lanceolate. The willette naturalize the dorelia. The leonidas is not homophonic. The leonidas does not see the willette. The leonidas naturalize the dorelia. The leonidas jaywalk the dorelia. The dorelia is transitory. The dorelia is homophonic. The dorelia jaywalk the willette. If something rice the dorelia then the dorelia does not see the willette. If something is transitory then it rice the dorelia. The willette does not chase the willette.", "logic": "\nErect(willette)\nLanceolate(willette)\nNaturalize(willette, dorelia)\nnot Homophonic(leonidas)\nnot Naturalize(leonidas, willette)\nNaturalize(leonidas, dorelia)\nJaywalk(leonidas, dorelia)\nTransitory(dorelia)\nHomophonic(dorelia)\nJaywalk(dorelia, willette)\nforall x (Rice(x, dorelia) -> not Naturalize(dorelia, willette))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Rice(x, dorelia))\n\nnot Rice(willette, willette)\n\nnot Rice(willette, willette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "The edi is favorite. The edi is overfed. The edi swoop the rab. The adam is not catamenial. The adam does not see the edi. The adam swoop the rab. The adam reflate the rab. The rab is minatory. The rab is catamenial. The rab reflate the edi. If something assuage the rab then the rab does not see the edi. If something is minatory then it assuage the rab. The edi assuage the adam.", "logic": "\nFavorite(edi)\nOverfed(edi)\nSwoop(edi, rab)\nnot Catamenial(adam)\nnot Swoop(adam, edi)\nSwoop(adam, rab)\nReflate(adam, rab)\nMinatory(rab)\nCatamenial(rab)\nReflate(rab, edi)\nforall x (Assuage(x, rab) -> not Swoop(rab, edi))\nforall x (Minatory(x) -> Assuage(x, rab))\n\nAssuage(edi, adam)\n\nAssuage(edi, adam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2011"} {"premises": "Ruben is unlaced. Ruben is manifest. Ruben is overriding. Ruben is evoked. Ruben is sleeved. Nikkie is unlaced. Nikkie is overriding. Nikkie is evoked. Nikkie is blockading. Jabez is unlaced. Jabez is manifest. Jabez is bristled. Jabez is overriding. Jabez is evoked. Jabez is blockading. Rough, overriding people are manifest. All overriding people are sleeved. Ruben is manifest.", "logic": "\nUnlaced(ruben)\nManifest(ruben)\nOverriding(ruben)\nEvoked(ruben)\nSleeved(ruben)\nUnlaced(nikkie)\nOverriding(nikkie)\nEvoked(nikkie)\nBlockading(nikkie)\nUnlaced(jabez)\nManifest(jabez)\nBristled(jabez)\nOverriding(jabez)\nEvoked(jabez)\nBlockading(jabez)\nforall x (Sleeved(x) and Overriding(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Overriding(x) -> Sleeved(x))\n\nManifest(ruben)\n\ntherefore Manifest(ruben)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Tandie is hearsay. Tandie is lxxx. Tandie is southerly. Tandie is struck. Tandie is adoptable. Kynthia is hearsay. Kynthia is southerly. Kynthia is struck. Kynthia is ungainly. Ramesh is hearsay. Ramesh is lxxx. Ramesh is appalled. Ramesh is southerly. Ramesh is struck. Ramesh is ungainly. Rough, southerly people are lxxx. All southerly people are adoptable. Tandie is not struck.", "logic": "\nHearsay(tandie)\nLxxx(tandie)\nSoutherly(tandie)\nStruck(tandie)\nAdoptable(tandie)\nHearsay(kynthia)\nSoutherly(kynthia)\nStruck(kynthia)\nUngainly(kynthia)\nHearsay(ramesh)\nLxxx(ramesh)\nAppalled(ramesh)\nSoutherly(ramesh)\nStruck(ramesh)\nUngainly(ramesh)\nforall x (Adoptable(x) and Southerly(x) -> Lxxx(x))\nforall x (Southerly(x) -> Adoptable(x))\n\nnot Struck(tandie)\n\ntherefore Struck(tandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Lia is indignant. Lia is cervical. Lia is expectable. Lia is endemical. Lia is anthropoid. Alix is indignant. Alix is expectable. Alix is endemical. Alix is atonic. Evey is indignant. Evey is cervical. Evey is surging. Evey is expectable. Evey is endemical. Evey is atonic. Rough, expectable people are cervical. All expectable people are anthropoid. Evey is anthropoid.", "logic": "\nIndignant(lia)\nCervical(lia)\nExpectable(lia)\nEndemical(lia)\nAnthropoid(lia)\nIndignant(alix)\nExpectable(alix)\nEndemical(alix)\nAtonic(alix)\nIndignant(evey)\nCervical(evey)\nSurging(evey)\nExpectable(evey)\nEndemical(evey)\nAtonic(evey)\nforall x (Anthropoid(x) and Expectable(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Expectable(x) -> Anthropoid(x))\n\nAnthropoid(evey)\n\nExpectable(evey) and forall x (Expectable(x) -> Anthropoid(x)) -> therefore Anthropoid(evey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Franz is unpunctual. Franz is foxy. Franz is thrown. Franz is calyculate. Franz is homely. Andri is unpunctual. Andri is thrown. Andri is calyculate. Andri is haphazard. Horst is unpunctual. Horst is foxy. Horst is broadnosed. Horst is thrown. Horst is calyculate. Horst is haphazard. Rough, thrown people are foxy. All thrown people are homely. Andri is not homely.", "logic": "\nUnpunctual(franz)\nFoxy(franz)\nThrown(franz)\nCalyculate(franz)\nHomely(franz)\nUnpunctual(andri)\nThrown(andri)\nCalyculate(andri)\nHaphazard(andri)\nUnpunctual(horst)\nFoxy(horst)\nBroadnosed(horst)\nThrown(horst)\nCalyculate(horst)\nHaphazard(horst)\nforall x (Homely(x) and Thrown(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Thrown(x) -> Homely(x))\n\nnot Homely(andri)\n\nThrown(andri) and forall x (Thrown(x) -> Homely(x)) -> therefore Homely(andri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Orton is fingerlike. Orton is conforming. Orton is tutelar. Orton is undersexed. Orton is reluctant. Hale is fingerlike. Hale is tutelar. Hale is undersexed. Hale is nodular. Lawton is fingerlike. Lawton is conforming. Lawton is boughed. Lawton is tutelar. Lawton is undersexed. Lawton is nodular. Rough, tutelar people are conforming. All tutelar people are reluctant. Hale is conforming.", "logic": "\nFingerlike(orton)\nConforming(orton)\nTutelar(orton)\nUndersexed(orton)\nReluctant(orton)\nFingerlike(hale)\nTutelar(hale)\nUndersexed(hale)\nNodular(hale)\nFingerlike(lawton)\nConforming(lawton)\nBoughed(lawton)\nTutelar(lawton)\nUndersexed(lawton)\nNodular(lawton)\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and Tutelar(x) -> Conforming(x))\nforall x (Tutelar(x) -> Reluctant(x))\n\nConforming(hale)\n\nTutelar(hale) and forall x (Tutelar(x) -> Reluctant(x)) -> therefore Reluctant(hale) Reluctant(hale) and Tutelar(hale) and forall x (Reluctant(x) and Tutelar(x) -> Conforming(x)) -> therefore Conforming(hale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Isidora is groomed. Isidora is ingenuous. Isidora is validated. Isidora is thumbed. Isidora is metacarpal. Lacie is groomed. Lacie is validated. Lacie is thumbed. Lacie is nearby. Ingemar is groomed. Ingemar is ingenuous. Ingemar is lxxxii. Ingemar is validated. Ingemar is thumbed. Ingemar is nearby. Rough, validated people are ingenuous. All validated people are metacarpal. Lacie is not ingenuous.", "logic": "\nGroomed(isidora)\nIngenuous(isidora)\nValidated(isidora)\nThumbed(isidora)\nMetacarpal(isidora)\nGroomed(lacie)\nValidated(lacie)\nThumbed(lacie)\nNearby(lacie)\nGroomed(ingemar)\nIngenuous(ingemar)\nLxxxii(ingemar)\nValidated(ingemar)\nThumbed(ingemar)\nNearby(ingemar)\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) and Validated(x) -> Ingenuous(x))\nforall x (Validated(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\n\nnot Ingenuous(lacie)\n\nValidated(lacie) and forall x (Validated(x) -> Metacarpal(x)) -> therefore Metacarpal(lacie) Metacarpal(lacie) and Validated(lacie) and forall x (Metacarpal(x) and Validated(x) -> Ingenuous(x)) -> therefore Ingenuous(lacie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Tilly is bifurcated. Tilly is ultimate. Tilly is sexual. Tilly is punitive. Tilly is genital. Jourdan is bifurcated. Jourdan is sexual. Jourdan is punitive. Jourdan is depressing. Fortuna is bifurcated. Fortuna is ultimate. Fortuna is dynamic. Fortuna is sexual. Fortuna is punitive. Fortuna is depressing. Rough, sexual people are ultimate. All sexual people are genital. Tilly is not dynamic.", "logic": "\nBifurcated(tilly)\nUltimate(tilly)\nSexual(tilly)\nPunitive(tilly)\nGenital(tilly)\nBifurcated(jourdan)\nSexual(jourdan)\nPunitive(jourdan)\nDepressing(jourdan)\nBifurcated(fortuna)\nUltimate(fortuna)\nDynamic(fortuna)\nSexual(fortuna)\nPunitive(fortuna)\nDepressing(fortuna)\nforall x (Genital(x) and Sexual(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Sexual(x) -> Genital(x))\n\nnot Dynamic(tilly)\n\nnot Dynamic(tilly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Pavel is bullheaded. Pavel is scorching. Pavel is stunted. Pavel is reticulate. Pavel is apothecial. Kathleen is bullheaded. Kathleen is stunted. Kathleen is reticulate. Kathleen is rearmost. Rich is bullheaded. Rich is scorching. Rich is dramatic. Rich is stunted. Rich is reticulate. Rich is rearmost. Rough, stunted people are scorching. All stunted people are apothecial. Kathleen is dramatic.", "logic": "\nBullheaded(pavel)\nScorching(pavel)\nStunted(pavel)\nReticulate(pavel)\nApothecial(pavel)\nBullheaded(kathleen)\nStunted(kathleen)\nReticulate(kathleen)\nRearmost(kathleen)\nBullheaded(rich)\nScorching(rich)\nDramatic(rich)\nStunted(rich)\nReticulate(rich)\nRearmost(rich)\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Stunted(x) -> Scorching(x))\nforall x (Stunted(x) -> Apothecial(x))\n\nDramatic(kathleen)\n\nDramatic(kathleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1135"} {"premises": "Kimberly is proficient. Kimberly is anuretic. Kimberly is aleutian. Red people are proficient. Kind, aleutian people are proficient. If Kimberly is binomial then Kimberly is not anuretic. All uncertain, proficient people are covetous. Young people are not covetous. All anuretic people are uncertain. Kimberly is anuretic.", "logic": "\nProficient(kimberly)\nAnuretic(kimberly)\nAleutian(kimberly)\nforall x (Aleutian(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) and Aleutian(x) -> Proficient(x))\nBinomial(kimberly) -> not Anuretic(kimberly)\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and Proficient(x) -> Covetous(x))\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) -> not Covetous(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) -> Uncertain(x))\n\nAnuretic(kimberly)\n\ntherefore Anuretic(kimberly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Dorothee is deft. Dorothee is murdered. Dorothee is chaotic. Red people are deft. Kind, chaotic people are deft. If Dorothee is archeozoic then Dorothee is not murdered. All romish, deft people are tenured. Young people are not tenured. All murdered people are romish. Dorothee is not deft.", "logic": "\nDeft(dorothee)\nMurdered(dorothee)\nChaotic(dorothee)\nforall x (Chaotic(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Murdered(x) and Chaotic(x) -> Deft(x))\nArcheozoic(dorothee) -> not Murdered(dorothee)\nforall x (Romish(x) and Deft(x) -> Tenured(x))\nforall x (Stoical(x) -> not Tenured(x))\nforall x (Murdered(x) -> Romish(x))\n\nnot Deft(dorothee)\n\ntherefore Deft(dorothee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Dorree is axillary. Dorree is trousered. Dorree is clanging. Red people are axillary. Kind, clanging people are axillary. If Dorree is pally then Dorree is not trousered. All vitriolic, axillary people are soggy. Young people are not soggy. All trousered people are vitriolic. Dorree is vitriolic.", "logic": "\nAxillary(dorree)\nTrousered(dorree)\nClanging(dorree)\nforall x (Clanging(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Trousered(x) and Clanging(x) -> Axillary(x))\nPally(dorree) -> not Trousered(dorree)\nforall x (Vitriolic(x) and Axillary(x) -> Soggy(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> not Soggy(x))\nforall x (Trousered(x) -> Vitriolic(x))\n\nVitriolic(dorree)\n\nTrousered(dorree) and forall x (Trousered(x) -> Vitriolic(x)) -> therefore Vitriolic(dorree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Celestina is untenanted. Celestina is windward. Celestina is matted. Red people are untenanted. Kind, matted people are untenanted. If Celestina is homophile then Celestina is not windward. All duckbill, untenanted people are rumbling. Young people are not rumbling. All windward people are duckbill. Celestina is not duckbill.", "logic": "\nUntenanted(celestina)\nWindward(celestina)\nMatted(celestina)\nforall x (Matted(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Windward(x) and Matted(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nHomophile(celestina) -> not Windward(celestina)\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Untenanted(x) -> Rumbling(x))\nforall x (Halting(x) -> not Rumbling(x))\nforall x (Windward(x) -> Duckbill(x))\n\nnot Duckbill(celestina)\n\nWindward(celestina) and forall x (Windward(x) -> Duckbill(x)) -> therefore Duckbill(celestina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Gray is aecial. Gray is wiggly. Gray is esteemed. Red people are aecial. Kind, esteemed people are aecial. If Gray is spent then Gray is not wiggly. All alated, aecial people are omissible. Young people are not omissible. All wiggly people are alated. Gray is omissible.", "logic": "\nAecial(gray)\nWiggly(gray)\nEsteemed(gray)\nforall x (Esteemed(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Wiggly(x) and Esteemed(x) -> Aecial(x))\nSpent(gray) -> not Wiggly(gray)\nforall x (Alated(x) and Aecial(x) -> Omissible(x))\nforall x (Vestmented(x) -> not Omissible(x))\nforall x (Wiggly(x) -> Alated(x))\n\nOmissible(gray)\n\nWiggly(gray) and forall x (Wiggly(x) -> Alated(x)) -> therefore Alated(gray) Alated(gray) and Aecial(gray) and forall x (Alated(x) and Aecial(x) -> Omissible(x)) -> therefore Omissible(gray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Benjamen is underwater. Benjamen is cutaneal. Benjamen is pubescent. Red people are underwater. Kind, pubescent people are underwater. If Benjamen is midwestern then Benjamen is not cutaneal. All pacific, underwater people are amused. Young people are not amused. All cutaneal people are pacific. Benjamen is not amused.", "logic": "\nUnderwater(benjamen)\nCutaneal(benjamen)\nPubescent(benjamen)\nforall x (Pubescent(x) -> Underwater(x))\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) and Pubescent(x) -> Underwater(x))\nMidwestern(benjamen) -> not Cutaneal(benjamen)\nforall x (Pacific(x) and Underwater(x) -> Amused(x))\nforall x (Frightful(x) -> not Amused(x))\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) -> Pacific(x))\n\nnot Amused(benjamen)\n\nCutaneal(benjamen) and forall x (Cutaneal(x) -> Pacific(x)) -> therefore Pacific(benjamen) Pacific(benjamen) and Underwater(benjamen) and forall x (Pacific(x) and Underwater(x) -> Amused(x)) -> therefore Amused(benjamen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Demetri is soldierly. Demetri is biographic. Demetri is versed. Red people are soldierly. Kind, versed people are soldierly. If Demetri is unlisted then Demetri is not biographic. All pinkish, soldierly people are disordered. Young people are not disordered. All biographic people are pinkish. Demetri is not unlisted.", "logic": "\nSoldierly(demetri)\nBiographic(demetri)\nVersed(demetri)\nforall x (Versed(x) -> Soldierly(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) and Versed(x) -> Soldierly(x))\nUnlisted(demetri) -> not Biographic(demetri)\nforall x (Pinkish(x) and Soldierly(x) -> Disordered(x))\nforall x (Fateful(x) -> not Disordered(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Pinkish(x))\n\nnot Unlisted(demetri)\n\nnot Unlisted(demetri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Aliza is probable. Aliza is sportive. Aliza is storied. Red people are probable. Kind, storied people are probable. If Aliza is tannic then Aliza is not sportive. All calamitous, probable people are meagerly. Young people are not meagerly. All sportive people are calamitous. Aliza is kuwaiti.", "logic": "\nProbable(aliza)\nSportive(aliza)\nStoried(aliza)\nforall x (Storied(x) -> Probable(x))\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Storied(x) -> Probable(x))\nTannic(aliza) -> not Sportive(aliza)\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Probable(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Kuwaiti(x) -> not Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Sportive(x) -> Calamitous(x))\n\nKuwaiti(aliza)\n\nKuwaiti(aliza) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1009"} {"premises": "Kettie is toxicant. Kettie is caulked. Thorn is toxicant. Thorn is caulked. Thorn is cyprian. Thorn is fuzzy. Thorn is provincial. Thorn is epimorphic. Lauralee is lush. Lauralee is toxicant. Lauralee is caulked. Lauralee is cyprian. Lauralee is fuzzy. Lauralee is provincial. Lauralee is epimorphic. If something is caulked then it is provincial. If Kettie is toxicant and Kettie is provincial then Kettie is lush. All lush things are fuzzy. All fuzzy things are epimorphic. If something is cyprian and epimorphic then it is caulked. Green things are epimorphic. If Kettie is provincial and Kettie is epimorphic then Kettie is caulked. If Kettie is caulked and Kettie is cyprian then Kettie is fuzzy. Lauralee is caulked.", "logic": "\nToxicant(kettie)\nCaulked(kettie)\nToxicant(thorn)\nCaulked(thorn)\nCyprian(thorn)\nFuzzy(thorn)\nProvincial(thorn)\nEpimorphic(thorn)\nLush(lauralee)\nToxicant(lauralee)\nCaulked(lauralee)\nCyprian(lauralee)\nFuzzy(lauralee)\nProvincial(lauralee)\nEpimorphic(lauralee)\nforall x (Caulked(x) -> Provincial(x))\nToxicant(kettie) and Provincial(kettie) -> Lush(kettie)\nforall x (Lush(x) -> Fuzzy(x))\nforall x (Fuzzy(x) -> Epimorphic(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and Epimorphic(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) -> Epimorphic(x))\nProvincial(kettie) and Epimorphic(kettie) -> Caulked(kettie)\nCaulked(kettie) and Cyprian(kettie) -> Fuzzy(kettie)\n\nCaulked(lauralee)\n\ntherefore Caulked(lauralee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Taylor is crinoid. Taylor is shaped. Cristine is crinoid. Cristine is shaped. Cristine is preserved. Cristine is buggy. Cristine is appressed. Cristine is libellous. Cabrina is undesired. Cabrina is crinoid. Cabrina is shaped. Cabrina is preserved. Cabrina is buggy. Cabrina is appressed. Cabrina is libellous. If something is shaped then it is appressed. If Taylor is crinoid and Taylor is appressed then Taylor is undesired. All undesired things are buggy. All buggy things are libellous. If something is preserved and libellous then it is shaped. Green things are libellous. If Taylor is appressed and Taylor is libellous then Taylor is shaped. If Taylor is shaped and Taylor is preserved then Taylor is buggy. Cabrina is not libellous.", "logic": "\nCrinoid(taylor)\nShaped(taylor)\nCrinoid(cristine)\nShaped(cristine)\nPreserved(cristine)\nBuggy(cristine)\nAppressed(cristine)\nLibellous(cristine)\nUndesired(cabrina)\nCrinoid(cabrina)\nShaped(cabrina)\nPreserved(cabrina)\nBuggy(cabrina)\nAppressed(cabrina)\nLibellous(cabrina)\nforall x (Shaped(x) -> Appressed(x))\nCrinoid(taylor) and Appressed(taylor) -> Undesired(taylor)\nforall x (Undesired(x) -> Buggy(x))\nforall x (Buggy(x) -> Libellous(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and Libellous(x) -> Shaped(x))\nforall x (Shaped(x) -> Libellous(x))\nAppressed(taylor) and Libellous(taylor) -> Shaped(taylor)\nShaped(taylor) and Preserved(taylor) -> Buggy(taylor)\n\nnot Libellous(cabrina)\n\ntherefore Libellous(cabrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Peggie is sultry. Peggie is pregnant. Iormina is sultry. Iormina is pregnant. Iormina is sordid. Iormina is quality. Iormina is villainous. Iormina is loverlike. Dorri is sacked. Dorri is sultry. Dorri is pregnant. Dorri is sordid. Dorri is quality. Dorri is villainous. Dorri is loverlike. If something is pregnant then it is villainous. If Peggie is sultry and Peggie is villainous then Peggie is sacked. All sacked things are quality. All quality things are loverlike. If something is sordid and loverlike then it is pregnant. Green things are loverlike. If Peggie is villainous and Peggie is loverlike then Peggie is pregnant. If Peggie is pregnant and Peggie is sordid then Peggie is quality. Peggie is villainous.", "logic": "\nSultry(peggie)\nPregnant(peggie)\nSultry(iormina)\nPregnant(iormina)\nSordid(iormina)\nQuality(iormina)\nVillainous(iormina)\nLoverlike(iormina)\nSacked(dorri)\nSultry(dorri)\nPregnant(dorri)\nSordid(dorri)\nQuality(dorri)\nVillainous(dorri)\nLoverlike(dorri)\nforall x (Pregnant(x) -> Villainous(x))\nSultry(peggie) and Villainous(peggie) -> Sacked(peggie)\nforall x (Sacked(x) -> Quality(x))\nforall x (Quality(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Sordid(x) and Loverlike(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nVillainous(peggie) and Loverlike(peggie) -> Pregnant(peggie)\nPregnant(peggie) and Sordid(peggie) -> Quality(peggie)\n\nVillainous(peggie)\n\nPregnant(peggie) and forall x (Pregnant(x) -> Villainous(x)) -> therefore Villainous(peggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Garcia is caucasian. Garcia is penial. Sampson is caucasian. Sampson is penial. Sampson is greedy. Sampson is abashed. Sampson is germanic. Sampson is fricative. Novelia is vicinal. Novelia is caucasian. Novelia is penial. Novelia is greedy. Novelia is abashed. Novelia is germanic. Novelia is fricative. If something is penial then it is germanic. If Garcia is caucasian and Garcia is germanic then Garcia is vicinal. All vicinal things are abashed. All abashed things are fricative. If something is greedy and fricative then it is penial. Green things are fricative. If Garcia is germanic and Garcia is fricative then Garcia is penial. If Garcia is penial and Garcia is greedy then Garcia is abashed. Garcia is not fricative.", "logic": "\nCaucasian(garcia)\nPenial(garcia)\nCaucasian(sampson)\nPenial(sampson)\nGreedy(sampson)\nAbashed(sampson)\nGermanic(sampson)\nFricative(sampson)\nVicinal(novelia)\nCaucasian(novelia)\nPenial(novelia)\nGreedy(novelia)\nAbashed(novelia)\nGermanic(novelia)\nFricative(novelia)\nforall x (Penial(x) -> Germanic(x))\nCaucasian(garcia) and Germanic(garcia) -> Vicinal(garcia)\nforall x (Vicinal(x) -> Abashed(x))\nforall x (Abashed(x) -> Fricative(x))\nforall x (Greedy(x) and Fricative(x) -> Penial(x))\nforall x (Penial(x) -> Fricative(x))\nGermanic(garcia) and Fricative(garcia) -> Penial(garcia)\nPenial(garcia) and Greedy(garcia) -> Abashed(garcia)\n\nnot Fricative(garcia)\n\nPenial(garcia) and forall x (Penial(x) -> Fricative(x)) -> therefore Fricative(garcia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Shelden is liege. Shelden is stumpy. Alexina is liege. Alexina is stumpy. Alexina is areolar. Alexina is operable. Alexina is woody. Alexina is abridged. Kelcey is bouffant. Kelcey is liege. Kelcey is stumpy. Kelcey is areolar. Kelcey is operable. Kelcey is woody. Kelcey is abridged. If something is stumpy then it is woody. If Shelden is liege and Shelden is woody then Shelden is bouffant. All bouffant things are operable. All operable things are abridged. If something is areolar and abridged then it is stumpy. Green things are abridged. If Shelden is woody and Shelden is abridged then Shelden is stumpy. If Shelden is stumpy and Shelden is areolar then Shelden is operable. Shelden is bouffant.", "logic": "\nLiege(shelden)\nStumpy(shelden)\nLiege(alexina)\nStumpy(alexina)\nAreolar(alexina)\nOperable(alexina)\nWoody(alexina)\nAbridged(alexina)\nBouffant(kelcey)\nLiege(kelcey)\nStumpy(kelcey)\nAreolar(kelcey)\nOperable(kelcey)\nWoody(kelcey)\nAbridged(kelcey)\nforall x (Stumpy(x) -> Woody(x))\nLiege(shelden) and Woody(shelden) -> Bouffant(shelden)\nforall x (Bouffant(x) -> Operable(x))\nforall x (Operable(x) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Areolar(x) and Abridged(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nforall x (Stumpy(x) -> Abridged(x))\nWoody(shelden) and Abridged(shelden) -> Stumpy(shelden)\nStumpy(shelden) and Areolar(shelden) -> Operable(shelden)\n\nBouffant(shelden)\n\nStumpy(shelden) and forall x (Stumpy(x) -> Woody(x)) -> therefore Woody(shelden) Liege(shelden) and Woody(shelden) and Liege(shelden) and Woody(shelden) -> Bouffant(shelden) -> therefore Bouffant(shelden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Manya is congolese. Manya is nutritive. Emeline is congolese. Emeline is nutritive. Emeline is grumose. Emeline is prolonged. Emeline is tyrolean. Emeline is factorial. Sileas is sixty. Sileas is congolese. Sileas is nutritive. Sileas is grumose. Sileas is prolonged. Sileas is tyrolean. Sileas is factorial. If something is nutritive then it is tyrolean. If Manya is congolese and Manya is tyrolean then Manya is sixty. All sixty things are prolonged. All prolonged things are factorial. If something is grumose and factorial then it is nutritive. Green things are factorial. If Manya is tyrolean and Manya is factorial then Manya is nutritive. If Manya is nutritive and Manya is grumose then Manya is prolonged. Manya is not sixty.", "logic": "\nCongolese(manya)\nNutritive(manya)\nCongolese(emeline)\nNutritive(emeline)\nGrumose(emeline)\nProlonged(emeline)\nTyrolean(emeline)\nFactorial(emeline)\nSixty(sileas)\nCongolese(sileas)\nNutritive(sileas)\nGrumose(sileas)\nProlonged(sileas)\nTyrolean(sileas)\nFactorial(sileas)\nforall x (Nutritive(x) -> Tyrolean(x))\nCongolese(manya) and Tyrolean(manya) -> Sixty(manya)\nforall x (Sixty(x) -> Prolonged(x))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) -> Factorial(x))\nforall x (Grumose(x) and Factorial(x) -> Nutritive(x))\nforall x (Nutritive(x) -> Factorial(x))\nTyrolean(manya) and Factorial(manya) -> Nutritive(manya)\nNutritive(manya) and Grumose(manya) -> Prolonged(manya)\n\nnot Sixty(manya)\n\nNutritive(manya) and forall x (Nutritive(x) -> Tyrolean(x)) -> therefore Tyrolean(manya) Congolese(manya) and Tyrolean(manya) and Congolese(manya) and Tyrolean(manya) -> Sixty(manya) -> therefore Sixty(manya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Vaughan is saliferous. Vaughan is consultive. Adey is saliferous. Adey is consultive. Adey is classified. Adey is unlicenced. Adey is diurnal. Adey is feathered. Britney is fitting. Britney is saliferous. Britney is consultive. Britney is classified. Britney is unlicenced. Britney is diurnal. Britney is feathered. If something is consultive then it is diurnal. If Vaughan is saliferous and Vaughan is diurnal then Vaughan is fitting. All fitting things are unlicenced. All unlicenced things are feathered. If something is classified and feathered then it is consultive. Green things are feathered. If Vaughan is diurnal and Vaughan is feathered then Vaughan is consultive. If Vaughan is consultive and Vaughan is classified then Vaughan is unlicenced. Adey is not fitting.", "logic": "\nSaliferous(vaughan)\nConsultive(vaughan)\nSaliferous(adey)\nConsultive(adey)\nClassified(adey)\nUnlicenced(adey)\nDiurnal(adey)\nFeathered(adey)\nFitting(britney)\nSaliferous(britney)\nConsultive(britney)\nClassified(britney)\nUnlicenced(britney)\nDiurnal(britney)\nFeathered(britney)\nforall x (Consultive(x) -> Diurnal(x))\nSaliferous(vaughan) and Diurnal(vaughan) -> Fitting(vaughan)\nforall x (Fitting(x) -> Unlicenced(x))\nforall x (Unlicenced(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) and Feathered(x) -> Consultive(x))\nforall x (Consultive(x) -> Feathered(x))\nDiurnal(vaughan) and Feathered(vaughan) -> Consultive(vaughan)\nConsultive(vaughan) and Classified(vaughan) -> Unlicenced(vaughan)\n\nnot Fitting(adey)\n\nnot Fitting(adey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Sabra is gelded. Sabra is anoestrous. Torrie is gelded. Torrie is anoestrous. Torrie is anadromous. Torrie is chorionic. Torrie is embezzled. Torrie is spongy. Colene is premature. Colene is gelded. Colene is anoestrous. Colene is anadromous. Colene is chorionic. Colene is embezzled. Colene is spongy. If something is anoestrous then it is embezzled. If Sabra is gelded and Sabra is embezzled then Sabra is premature. All premature things are chorionic. All chorionic things are spongy. If something is anadromous and spongy then it is anoestrous. Green things are spongy. If Sabra is embezzled and Sabra is spongy then Sabra is anoestrous. If Sabra is anoestrous and Sabra is anadromous then Sabra is chorionic. Sabra is anadromous.", "logic": "\nGelded(sabra)\nAnoestrous(sabra)\nGelded(torrie)\nAnoestrous(torrie)\nAnadromous(torrie)\nChorionic(torrie)\nEmbezzled(torrie)\nSpongy(torrie)\nPremature(colene)\nGelded(colene)\nAnoestrous(colene)\nAnadromous(colene)\nChorionic(colene)\nEmbezzled(colene)\nSpongy(colene)\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Embezzled(x))\nGelded(sabra) and Embezzled(sabra) -> Premature(sabra)\nforall x (Premature(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Anadromous(x) and Spongy(x) -> Anoestrous(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Spongy(x))\nEmbezzled(sabra) and Spongy(sabra) -> Anoestrous(sabra)\nAnoestrous(sabra) and Anadromous(sabra) -> Chorionic(sabra)\n\nAnadromous(sabra)\n\nAnadromous(sabra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The kassia excavate the les. The les thaw the vannie. The vannie is achromic. The giorgio is achromic. If something is homophile then it thaw the kassia. If something scramble the les and it is ammoniac then it does not eat the vannie. If something thaw the kassia and the kassia does not need the giorgio then it is southbound. If something is ammoniac then it excavate the giorgio. If the vannie is achromic then the vannie is homophile. If something is ammoniac and it does not like the les then it excavate the kassia. If something excavate the kassia then the kassia scramble the les. If something scramble the vannie then the vannie thaw the giorgio. The vannie is achromic.", "logic": "\nExcavate(kassia, les)\nThaw(les, vannie)\nAchromic(vannie)\nAchromic(giorgio)\nforall x (Homophile(x) -> Thaw(x, kassia))\nforall x (Scramble(x, les) and Ammoniac(x) -> not Excavate(x, vannie))\nforall x (Thaw(x, kassia) and not Scramble(kassia, giorgio) -> Southbound(x))\nforall x (Ammoniac(x) -> Excavate(x, giorgio))\nAchromic(vannie) -> Homophile(vannie)\nforall x (Ammoniac(x) and not Thaw(x, les) -> Excavate(x, kassia))\nforall x (Excavate(x, kassia) -> Scramble(kassia, les))\nforall x (Scramble(x, vannie) -> Thaw(vannie, giorgio))\n\nAchromic(vannie)\n\ntherefore Achromic(vannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The annamari lick the kristin. The kristin pile the cathlene. The cathlene is lackluster. The gustavo is lackluster. If something is virtuous then it pile the annamari. If something glance the kristin and it is estuarial then it does not eat the cathlene. If something pile the annamari and the annamari does not need the gustavo then it is down. If something is estuarial then it lick the gustavo. If the cathlene is lackluster then the cathlene is virtuous. If something is estuarial and it does not like the kristin then it lick the annamari. If something lick the annamari then the annamari glance the kristin. If something glance the cathlene then the cathlene pile the gustavo. The cathlene is not lackluster.", "logic": "\nLick(annamari, kristin)\nPile(kristin, cathlene)\nLackluster(cathlene)\nLackluster(gustavo)\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Pile(x, annamari))\nforall x (Glance(x, kristin) and Estuarial(x) -> not Lick(x, cathlene))\nforall x (Pile(x, annamari) and not Glance(annamari, gustavo) -> Down(x))\nforall x (Estuarial(x) -> Lick(x, gustavo))\nLackluster(cathlene) -> Virtuous(cathlene)\nforall x (Estuarial(x) and not Pile(x, kristin) -> Lick(x, annamari))\nforall x (Lick(x, annamari) -> Glance(annamari, kristin))\nforall x (Glance(x, cathlene) -> Pile(cathlene, gustavo))\n\nnot Lackluster(cathlene)\n\ntherefore Lackluster(cathlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The dru photostat the olle. The olle repot the merla. The merla is hungry. The claribel is hungry. If something is unrhythmic then it repot the dru. If something glean the olle and it is sarcoid then it does not eat the merla. If something repot the dru and the dru does not need the claribel then it is indigent. If something is sarcoid then it photostat the claribel. If the merla is hungry then the merla is unrhythmic. If something is sarcoid and it does not like the olle then it photostat the dru. If something photostat the dru then the dru glean the olle. If something glean the merla then the merla repot the claribel. The merla is unrhythmic.", "logic": "\nPhotostat(dru, olle)\nRepot(olle, merla)\nHungry(merla)\nHungry(claribel)\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) -> Repot(x, dru))\nforall x (Glean(x, olle) and Sarcoid(x) -> not Photostat(x, merla))\nforall x (Repot(x, dru) and not Glean(dru, claribel) -> Indigent(x))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) -> Photostat(x, claribel))\nHungry(merla) -> Unrhythmic(merla)\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) and not Repot(x, olle) -> Photostat(x, dru))\nforall x (Photostat(x, dru) -> Glean(dru, olle))\nforall x (Glean(x, merla) -> Repot(merla, claribel))\n\nUnrhythmic(merla)\n\nHungry(merla) and Hungry(merla) -> Unrhythmic(merla) -> therefore Unrhythmic(merla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The thaddius encroach the travers. The travers poniard the emmett. The emmett is sciatic. The maynard is sciatic. If something is smuggled then it poniard the thaddius. If something assert the travers and it is wicked then it does not eat the emmett. If something poniard the thaddius and the thaddius does not need the maynard then it is together. If something is wicked then it encroach the maynard. If the emmett is sciatic then the emmett is smuggled. If something is wicked and it does not like the travers then it encroach the thaddius. If something encroach the thaddius then the thaddius assert the travers. If something assert the emmett then the emmett poniard the maynard. The emmett is not smuggled.", "logic": "\nEncroach(thaddius, travers)\nPoniard(travers, emmett)\nSciatic(emmett)\nSciatic(maynard)\nforall x (Smuggled(x) -> Poniard(x, thaddius))\nforall x (Assert(x, travers) and Wicked(x) -> not Encroach(x, emmett))\nforall x (Poniard(x, thaddius) and not Assert(thaddius, maynard) -> Together(x))\nforall x (Wicked(x) -> Encroach(x, maynard))\nSciatic(emmett) -> Smuggled(emmett)\nforall x (Wicked(x) and not Poniard(x, travers) -> Encroach(x, thaddius))\nforall x (Encroach(x, thaddius) -> Assert(thaddius, travers))\nforall x (Assert(x, emmett) -> Poniard(emmett, maynard))\n\nnot Smuggled(emmett)\n\nSciatic(emmett) and Sciatic(emmett) -> Smuggled(emmett) -> therefore Smuggled(emmett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The ragnar signpost the bogart. The bogart colonise the bradly. The bradly is donnian. The vivie is donnian. If something is laggard then it colonise the ragnar. If something kayak the bogart and it is voracious then it does not eat the bradly. If something colonise the ragnar and the ragnar does not need the vivie then it is electoral. If something is voracious then it signpost the vivie. If the bradly is donnian then the bradly is laggard. If something is voracious and it does not like the bogart then it signpost the ragnar. If something signpost the ragnar then the ragnar kayak the bogart. If something kayak the bradly then the bradly colonise the vivie. The bradly colonise the ragnar.", "logic": "\nSignpost(ragnar, bogart)\nColonise(bogart, bradly)\nDonnian(bradly)\nDonnian(vivie)\nforall x (Laggard(x) -> Colonise(x, ragnar))\nforall x (Kayak(x, bogart) and Voracious(x) -> not Signpost(x, bradly))\nforall x (Colonise(x, ragnar) and not Kayak(ragnar, vivie) -> Electoral(x))\nforall x (Voracious(x) -> Signpost(x, vivie))\nDonnian(bradly) -> Laggard(bradly)\nforall x (Voracious(x) and not Colonise(x, bogart) -> Signpost(x, ragnar))\nforall x (Signpost(x, ragnar) -> Kayak(ragnar, bogart))\nforall x (Kayak(x, bradly) -> Colonise(bradly, vivie))\n\nColonise(bradly, ragnar)\n\nDonnian(bradly) and Donnian(bradly) -> Laggard(bradly) -> therefore Laggard(bradly) Laggard(bradly) and forall x (Laggard(x) -> Colonise(x, ragnar)) -> therefore Colonise(bradly, ragnar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The ileana scold the mallorie. The mallorie supersede the remington. The remington is tied. The jilli is tied. If something is sheathed then it supersede the ileana. If something drool the mallorie and it is unaddicted then it does not eat the remington. If something supersede the ileana and the ileana does not need the jilli then it is angled. If something is unaddicted then it scold the jilli. If the remington is tied then the remington is sheathed. If something is unaddicted and it does not like the mallorie then it scold the ileana. If something scold the ileana then the ileana drool the mallorie. If something drool the remington then the remington supersede the jilli. The remington does not like the ileana.", "logic": "\nScold(ileana, mallorie)\nSupersede(mallorie, remington)\nTied(remington)\nTied(jilli)\nforall x (Sheathed(x) -> Supersede(x, ileana))\nforall x (Drool(x, mallorie) and Unaddicted(x) -> not Scold(x, remington))\nforall x (Supersede(x, ileana) and not Drool(ileana, jilli) -> Angled(x))\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) -> Scold(x, jilli))\nTied(remington) -> Sheathed(remington)\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) and not Supersede(x, mallorie) -> Scold(x, ileana))\nforall x (Scold(x, ileana) -> Drool(ileana, mallorie))\nforall x (Drool(x, remington) -> Supersede(remington, jilli))\n\nnot Supersede(remington, ileana)\n\nTied(remington) and Tied(remington) -> Sheathed(remington) -> therefore Sheathed(remington) Sheathed(remington) and forall x (Sheathed(x) -> Supersede(x, ileana)) -> therefore Supersede(remington, ileana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The anastasia nick the laurette. The laurette exhale the elfrieda. The elfrieda is biased. The ange is biased. If something is unaltered then it exhale the anastasia. If something hark the laurette and it is wigged then it does not eat the elfrieda. If something exhale the anastasia and the anastasia does not need the ange then it is heroical. If something is wigged then it nick the ange. If the elfrieda is biased then the elfrieda is unaltered. If something is wigged and it does not like the laurette then it nick the anastasia. If something nick the anastasia then the anastasia hark the laurette. If something hark the elfrieda then the elfrieda exhale the ange. The elfrieda does not eat the anastasia.", "logic": "\nNick(anastasia, laurette)\nExhale(laurette, elfrieda)\nBiased(elfrieda)\nBiased(ange)\nforall x (Unaltered(x) -> Exhale(x, anastasia))\nforall x (Hark(x, laurette) and Wigged(x) -> not Nick(x, elfrieda))\nforall x (Exhale(x, anastasia) and not Hark(anastasia, ange) -> Heroical(x))\nforall x (Wigged(x) -> Nick(x, ange))\nBiased(elfrieda) -> Unaltered(elfrieda)\nforall x (Wigged(x) and not Exhale(x, laurette) -> Nick(x, anastasia))\nforall x (Nick(x, anastasia) -> Hark(anastasia, laurette))\nforall x (Hark(x, elfrieda) -> Exhale(elfrieda, ange))\n\nnot Nick(elfrieda, anastasia)\n\nforall x (Wigged(x) and not Exhale(x, laurette) -> Nick(x, anastasia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The merry blackleg the evonne. The evonne subsume the janette. The janette is trigonal. The starr is trigonal. If something is offbeat then it subsume the merry. If something enfold the evonne and it is bordered then it does not eat the janette. If something subsume the merry and the merry does not need the starr then it is articular. If something is bordered then it blackleg the starr. If the janette is trigonal then the janette is offbeat. If something is bordered and it does not like the evonne then it blackleg the merry. If something blackleg the merry then the merry enfold the evonne. If something enfold the janette then the janette subsume the starr. The starr blackleg the starr.", "logic": "\nBlackleg(merry, evonne)\nSubsume(evonne, janette)\nTrigonal(janette)\nTrigonal(starr)\nforall x (Offbeat(x) -> Subsume(x, merry))\nforall x (Enfold(x, evonne) and Bordered(x) -> not Blackleg(x, janette))\nforall x (Subsume(x, merry) and not Enfold(merry, starr) -> Articular(x))\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Blackleg(x, starr))\nTrigonal(janette) -> Offbeat(janette)\nforall x (Bordered(x) and not Subsume(x, evonne) -> Blackleg(x, merry))\nforall x (Blackleg(x, merry) -> Enfold(merry, evonne))\nforall x (Enfold(x, janette) -> Subsume(janette, starr))\n\nBlackleg(starr, starr)\n\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Blackleg(x, starr)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The cecelia gallop the roanne. The roanne advert the amata. The amata is concave. The madelle is concave. If something is sundried then it advert the cecelia. If something laicise the roanne and it is winsome then it does not eat the amata. If something advert the cecelia and the cecelia does not need the madelle then it is realized. If something is winsome then it gallop the madelle. If the amata is concave then the amata is sundried. If something is winsome and it does not like the roanne then it gallop the cecelia. If something gallop the cecelia then the cecelia laicise the roanne. If something laicise the amata then the amata advert the madelle. The amata is not realized.", "logic": "\nGallop(cecelia, roanne)\nAdvert(roanne, amata)\nConcave(amata)\nConcave(madelle)\nforall x (Sundried(x) -> Advert(x, cecelia))\nforall x (Laicise(x, roanne) and Winsome(x) -> not Gallop(x, amata))\nforall x (Advert(x, cecelia) and not Laicise(cecelia, madelle) -> Realized(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) -> Gallop(x, madelle))\nConcave(amata) -> Sundried(amata)\nforall x (Winsome(x) and not Advert(x, roanne) -> Gallop(x, cecelia))\nforall x (Gallop(x, cecelia) -> Laicise(cecelia, roanne))\nforall x (Laicise(x, amata) -> Advert(amata, madelle))\n\nnot Realized(amata)\n\nforall x (Advert(x, cecelia) and not Laicise(cecelia, madelle) -> Realized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The anthe transpire the iolanthe. The iolanthe rubberize the hester. The hester is bountied. The hermann is bountied. If something is quaggy then it rubberize the anthe. If something default the iolanthe and it is scandent then it does not eat the hester. If something rubberize the anthe and the anthe does not need the hermann then it is thriving. If something is scandent then it transpire the hermann. If the hester is bountied then the hester is quaggy. If something is scandent and it does not like the iolanthe then it transpire the anthe. If something transpire the anthe then the anthe default the iolanthe. If something default the hester then the hester rubberize the hermann. The hermann default the anthe.", "logic": "\nTranspire(anthe, iolanthe)\nRubberize(iolanthe, hester)\nBountied(hester)\nBountied(hermann)\nforall x (Quaggy(x) -> Rubberize(x, anthe))\nforall x (Default(x, iolanthe) and Scandent(x) -> not Transpire(x, hester))\nforall x (Rubberize(x, anthe) and not Default(anthe, hermann) -> Thriving(x))\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Transpire(x, hermann))\nBountied(hester) -> Quaggy(hester)\nforall x (Scandent(x) and not Rubberize(x, iolanthe) -> Transpire(x, anthe))\nforall x (Transpire(x, anthe) -> Default(anthe, iolanthe))\nforall x (Default(x, hester) -> Rubberize(hester, hermann))\n\nDefault(hermann, anthe)\n\nDefault(hermann, anthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The bethena degauss the isaac. The isaac previse the cristal. The cristal is citric. The prasun is citric. If something is forgotten then it previse the bethena. If something weekend the isaac and it is allophonic then it does not eat the cristal. If something previse the bethena and the bethena does not need the prasun then it is bony. If something is allophonic then it degauss the prasun. If the cristal is citric then the cristal is forgotten. If something is allophonic and it does not like the isaac then it degauss the bethena. If something degauss the bethena then the bethena weekend the isaac. If something weekend the cristal then the cristal previse the prasun. The bethena is not citric.", "logic": "\nDegauss(bethena, isaac)\nPrevise(isaac, cristal)\nCitric(cristal)\nCitric(prasun)\nforall x (Forgotten(x) -> Previse(x, bethena))\nforall x (Weekend(x, isaac) and Allophonic(x) -> not Degauss(x, cristal))\nforall x (Previse(x, bethena) and not Weekend(bethena, prasun) -> Bony(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) -> Degauss(x, prasun))\nCitric(cristal) -> Forgotten(cristal)\nforall x (Allophonic(x) and not Previse(x, isaac) -> Degauss(x, bethena))\nforall x (Degauss(x, bethena) -> Weekend(bethena, isaac))\nforall x (Weekend(x, cristal) -> Previse(cristal, prasun))\n\nnot Citric(bethena)\n\nnot Citric(bethena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The brunella border the wilek. The wilek desire the sadella. The sadella is educative. The jens is educative. If something is unsheathed then it desire the brunella. If something wrap the wilek and it is suicidal then it does not eat the sadella. If something desire the brunella and the brunella does not need the jens then it is zygodactyl. If something is suicidal then it border the jens. If the sadella is educative then the sadella is unsheathed. If something is suicidal and it does not like the wilek then it border the brunella. If something border the brunella then the brunella wrap the wilek. If something wrap the sadella then the sadella desire the jens. The jens desire the jens.", "logic": "\nBorder(brunella, wilek)\nDesire(wilek, sadella)\nEducative(sadella)\nEducative(jens)\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) -> Desire(x, brunella))\nforall x (Wrap(x, wilek) and Suicidal(x) -> not Border(x, sadella))\nforall x (Desire(x, brunella) and not Wrap(brunella, jens) -> Zygodactyl(x))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) -> Border(x, jens))\nEducative(sadella) -> Unsheathed(sadella)\nforall x (Suicidal(x) and not Desire(x, wilek) -> Border(x, brunella))\nforall x (Border(x, brunella) -> Wrap(brunella, wilek))\nforall x (Wrap(x, sadella) -> Desire(sadella, jens))\n\nDesire(jens, jens)\n\nDesire(jens, jens) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1626"} {"premises": "The martino is youngish. The martino is trifling. The martino is sidearm. The martino accrete the shelagh. The martino prioritize the celisse. The shelagh is stubbly. The shelagh is strong. The celisse garrote the shelagh. The celisse accrete the shelagh. The celisse prioritize the martino. All youngish things are strong. If something prioritize the celisse then it accrete the martino. If something accrete the martino and it garrote the shelagh then the martino is sidearm. If something prioritize the shelagh and it prioritize the martino then the shelagh garrote the martino. If the shelagh prioritize the martino and the martino is youngish then the shelagh garrote the celisse. If the celisse is stubbly then the celisse accrete the martino. If something is stubbly and it garrote the celisse then it prioritize the martino. If something accrete the martino then the martino garrote the celisse. The martino is sidearm.", "logic": "\nYoungish(martino)\nTrifling(martino)\nSidearm(martino)\nAccrete(martino, shelagh)\nPrioritize(martino, celisse)\nStubbly(shelagh)\nStrong(shelagh)\nGarrote(celisse, shelagh)\nAccrete(celisse, shelagh)\nPrioritize(celisse, martino)\nforall x (Youngish(x) -> Strong(x))\nforall x (Prioritize(x, celisse) -> Accrete(x, martino))\nforall x (Accrete(x, martino) and Garrote(x, shelagh) -> Sidearm(martino))\nforall x (Prioritize(x, shelagh) and Prioritize(x, martino) -> Garrote(shelagh, martino))\nPrioritize(shelagh, martino) and Youngish(martino) -> Garrote(shelagh, celisse)\nStubbly(celisse) -> Accrete(celisse, martino)\nforall x (Stubbly(x) and Garrote(x, celisse) -> Prioritize(x, martino))\nforall x (Accrete(x, martino) -> Garrote(martino, celisse))\n\nSidearm(martino)\n\ntherefore Sidearm(martino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The fraser is strategic. The fraser is exocrine. The fraser is zodiacal. The fraser inclose the shay. The fraser deter the waiter. The shay is engorged. The shay is caroline. The waiter pretend the shay. The waiter inclose the shay. The waiter deter the fraser. All strategic things are caroline. If something deter the waiter then it inclose the fraser. If something inclose the fraser and it pretend the shay then the fraser is zodiacal. If something deter the shay and it deter the fraser then the shay pretend the fraser. If the shay deter the fraser and the fraser is strategic then the shay pretend the waiter. If the waiter is engorged then the waiter inclose the fraser. If something is engorged and it pretend the waiter then it deter the fraser. If something inclose the fraser then the fraser pretend the waiter. The waiter does not need the shay.", "logic": "\nStrategic(fraser)\nExocrine(fraser)\nZodiacal(fraser)\nInclose(fraser, shay)\nDeter(fraser, waiter)\nEngorged(shay)\nCaroline(shay)\nPretend(waiter, shay)\nInclose(waiter, shay)\nDeter(waiter, fraser)\nforall x (Strategic(x) -> Caroline(x))\nforall x (Deter(x, waiter) -> Inclose(x, fraser))\nforall x (Inclose(x, fraser) and Pretend(x, shay) -> Zodiacal(fraser))\nforall x (Deter(x, shay) and Deter(x, fraser) -> Pretend(shay, fraser))\nDeter(shay, fraser) and Strategic(fraser) -> Pretend(shay, waiter)\nEngorged(waiter) -> Inclose(waiter, fraser)\nforall x (Engorged(x) and Pretend(x, waiter) -> Deter(x, fraser))\nforall x (Inclose(x, fraser) -> Pretend(fraser, waiter))\n\nnot Inclose(waiter, shay)\n\ntherefore Inclose(waiter, shay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The bellanca is monatomic. The bellanca is surefooted. The bellanca is cushy. The bellanca examine the alaa. The bellanca smirk the jennine. The alaa is disjoint. The alaa is asteriated. The jennine celebrate the alaa. The jennine examine the alaa. The jennine smirk the bellanca. All monatomic things are asteriated. If something smirk the jennine then it examine the bellanca. If something examine the bellanca and it celebrate the alaa then the bellanca is cushy. If something smirk the alaa and it smirk the bellanca then the alaa celebrate the bellanca. If the alaa smirk the bellanca and the bellanca is monatomic then the alaa celebrate the jennine. If the jennine is disjoint then the jennine examine the bellanca. If something is disjoint and it celebrate the jennine then it smirk the bellanca. If something examine the bellanca then the bellanca celebrate the jennine. The bellanca is asteriated.", "logic": "\nMonatomic(bellanca)\nSurefooted(bellanca)\nCushy(bellanca)\nExamine(bellanca, alaa)\nSmirk(bellanca, jennine)\nDisjoint(alaa)\nAsteriated(alaa)\nCelebrate(jennine, alaa)\nExamine(jennine, alaa)\nSmirk(jennine, bellanca)\nforall x (Monatomic(x) -> Asteriated(x))\nforall x (Smirk(x, jennine) -> Examine(x, bellanca))\nforall x (Examine(x, bellanca) and Celebrate(x, alaa) -> Cushy(bellanca))\nforall x (Smirk(x, alaa) and Smirk(x, bellanca) -> Celebrate(alaa, bellanca))\nSmirk(alaa, bellanca) and Monatomic(bellanca) -> Celebrate(alaa, jennine)\nDisjoint(jennine) -> Examine(jennine, bellanca)\nforall x (Disjoint(x) and Celebrate(x, jennine) -> Smirk(x, bellanca))\nforall x (Examine(x, bellanca) -> Celebrate(bellanca, jennine))\n\nAsteriated(bellanca)\n\nMonatomic(bellanca) and forall x (Monatomic(x) -> Asteriated(x)) -> therefore Asteriated(bellanca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The saundra is futile. The saundra is caducous. The saundra is variegated. The saundra fritter the herminia. The saundra stripe the emalee. The herminia is unmovable. The herminia is nonlegal. The emalee misalign the herminia. The emalee fritter the herminia. The emalee stripe the saundra. All futile things are nonlegal. If something stripe the emalee then it fritter the saundra. If something fritter the saundra and it misalign the herminia then the saundra is variegated. If something stripe the herminia and it stripe the saundra then the herminia misalign the saundra. If the herminia stripe the saundra and the saundra is futile then the herminia misalign the emalee. If the emalee is unmovable then the emalee fritter the saundra. If something is unmovable and it misalign the emalee then it stripe the saundra. If something fritter the saundra then the saundra misalign the emalee. The saundra is not nonlegal.", "logic": "\nFutile(saundra)\nCaducous(saundra)\nVariegated(saundra)\nFritter(saundra, herminia)\nStripe(saundra, emalee)\nUnmovable(herminia)\nNonlegal(herminia)\nMisalign(emalee, herminia)\nFritter(emalee, herminia)\nStripe(emalee, saundra)\nforall x (Futile(x) -> Nonlegal(x))\nforall x (Stripe(x, emalee) -> Fritter(x, saundra))\nforall x (Fritter(x, saundra) and Misalign(x, herminia) -> Variegated(saundra))\nforall x (Stripe(x, herminia) and Stripe(x, saundra) -> Misalign(herminia, saundra))\nStripe(herminia, saundra) and Futile(saundra) -> Misalign(herminia, emalee)\nUnmovable(emalee) -> Fritter(emalee, saundra)\nforall x (Unmovable(x) and Misalign(x, emalee) -> Stripe(x, saundra))\nforall x (Fritter(x, saundra) -> Misalign(saundra, emalee))\n\nnot Nonlegal(saundra)\n\nFutile(saundra) and forall x (Futile(x) -> Nonlegal(x)) -> therefore Nonlegal(saundra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The ellen is basifixed. The ellen is tertian. The ellen is indulgent. The ellen joke the ailina. The ellen plead the tracie. The ailina is homesick. The ailina is bipedal. The tracie disforest the ailina. The tracie joke the ailina. The tracie plead the ellen. All basifixed things are bipedal. If something plead the tracie then it joke the ellen. If something joke the ellen and it disforest the ailina then the ellen is indulgent. If something plead the ailina and it plead the ellen then the ailina disforest the ellen. If the ailina plead the ellen and the ellen is basifixed then the ailina disforest the tracie. If the tracie is homesick then the tracie joke the ellen. If something is homesick and it disforest the tracie then it plead the ellen. If something joke the ellen then the ellen disforest the tracie. The ellen disforest the tracie.", "logic": "\nBasifixed(ellen)\nTertian(ellen)\nIndulgent(ellen)\nJoke(ellen, ailina)\nPlead(ellen, tracie)\nHomesick(ailina)\nBipedal(ailina)\nDisforest(tracie, ailina)\nJoke(tracie, ailina)\nPlead(tracie, ellen)\nforall x (Basifixed(x) -> Bipedal(x))\nforall x (Plead(x, tracie) -> Joke(x, ellen))\nforall x (Joke(x, ellen) and Disforest(x, ailina) -> Indulgent(ellen))\nforall x (Plead(x, ailina) and Plead(x, ellen) -> Disforest(ailina, ellen))\nPlead(ailina, ellen) and Basifixed(ellen) -> Disforest(ailina, tracie)\nHomesick(tracie) -> Joke(tracie, ellen)\nforall x (Homesick(x) and Disforest(x, tracie) -> Plead(x, ellen))\nforall x (Joke(x, ellen) -> Disforest(ellen, tracie))\n\nDisforest(ellen, tracie)\n\nPlead(ellen, tracie) and forall x (Plead(x, tracie) -> Joke(x, ellen)) -> therefore Joke(ellen, ellen) Joke(ellen, ellen) and forall x (Joke(x, ellen) -> Disforest(ellen, tracie)) -> therefore Disforest(ellen, tracie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The celestyna is seasoned. The celestyna is boozy. The celestyna is asian. The celestyna pine the emile. The celestyna recommence the mandy. The emile is assigned. The emile is shivery. The mandy expel the emile. The mandy pine the emile. The mandy recommence the celestyna. All seasoned things are shivery. If something recommence the mandy then it pine the celestyna. If something pine the celestyna and it expel the emile then the celestyna is asian. If something recommence the emile and it recommence the celestyna then the emile expel the celestyna. If the emile recommence the celestyna and the celestyna is seasoned then the emile expel the mandy. If the mandy is assigned then the mandy pine the celestyna. If something is assigned and it expel the mandy then it recommence the celestyna. If something pine the celestyna then the celestyna expel the mandy. The celestyna does not chase the mandy.", "logic": "\nSeasoned(celestyna)\nBoozy(celestyna)\nAsian(celestyna)\nPine(celestyna, emile)\nRecommence(celestyna, mandy)\nAssigned(emile)\nShivery(emile)\nExpel(mandy, emile)\nPine(mandy, emile)\nRecommence(mandy, celestyna)\nforall x (Seasoned(x) -> Shivery(x))\nforall x (Recommence(x, mandy) -> Pine(x, celestyna))\nforall x (Pine(x, celestyna) and Expel(x, emile) -> Asian(celestyna))\nforall x (Recommence(x, emile) and Recommence(x, celestyna) -> Expel(emile, celestyna))\nRecommence(emile, celestyna) and Seasoned(celestyna) -> Expel(emile, mandy)\nAssigned(mandy) -> Pine(mandy, celestyna)\nforall x (Assigned(x) and Expel(x, mandy) -> Recommence(x, celestyna))\nforall x (Pine(x, celestyna) -> Expel(celestyna, mandy))\n\nnot Expel(celestyna, mandy)\n\nRecommence(celestyna, mandy) and forall x (Recommence(x, mandy) -> Pine(x, celestyna)) -> therefore Pine(celestyna, celestyna) Pine(celestyna, celestyna) and forall x (Pine(x, celestyna) -> Expel(celestyna, mandy)) -> therefore Expel(celestyna, mandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The deva is visionary. The deva is momentous. The deva is obsessed. The deva teargas the chandler. The deva dash the deborah. The chandler is boggy. The chandler is hedonistic. The deborah sled the chandler. The deborah teargas the chandler. The deborah dash the deva. All visionary things are hedonistic. If something dash the deborah then it teargas the deva. If something teargas the deva and it sled the chandler then the deva is obsessed. If something dash the chandler and it dash the deva then the chandler sled the deva. If the chandler dash the deva and the deva is visionary then the chandler sled the deborah. If the deborah is boggy then the deborah teargas the deva. If something is boggy and it sled the deborah then it dash the deva. If something teargas the deva then the deva sled the deborah. The chandler does not chase the deva.", "logic": "\nVisionary(deva)\nMomentous(deva)\nObsessed(deva)\nTeargas(deva, chandler)\nDash(deva, deborah)\nBoggy(chandler)\nHedonistic(chandler)\nSled(deborah, chandler)\nTeargas(deborah, chandler)\nDash(deborah, deva)\nforall x (Visionary(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\nforall x (Dash(x, deborah) -> Teargas(x, deva))\nforall x (Teargas(x, deva) and Sled(x, chandler) -> Obsessed(deva))\nforall x (Dash(x, chandler) and Dash(x, deva) -> Sled(chandler, deva))\nDash(chandler, deva) and Visionary(deva) -> Sled(chandler, deborah)\nBoggy(deborah) -> Teargas(deborah, deva)\nforall x (Boggy(x) and Sled(x, deborah) -> Dash(x, deva))\nforall x (Teargas(x, deva) -> Sled(deva, deborah))\n\nnot Sled(chandler, deva)\n\nforall x (Dash(x, chandler) and Dash(x, deva) -> Sled(chandler, deva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The edna is emblematic. The edna is postmodern. The edna is shadowy. The edna introject the mercie. The edna decolonise the pennie. The mercie is nubbly. The mercie is awaited. The pennie publicise the mercie. The pennie introject the mercie. The pennie decolonise the edna. All emblematic things are awaited. If something decolonise the pennie then it introject the edna. If something introject the edna and it publicise the mercie then the edna is shadowy. If something decolonise the mercie and it decolonise the edna then the mercie publicise the edna. If the mercie decolonise the edna and the edna is emblematic then the mercie publicise the pennie. If the pennie is nubbly then the pennie introject the edna. If something is nubbly and it publicise the pennie then it decolonise the edna. If something introject the edna then the edna publicise the pennie. The mercie publicise the pennie.", "logic": "\nEmblematic(edna)\nPostmodern(edna)\nShadowy(edna)\nIntroject(edna, mercie)\nDecolonise(edna, pennie)\nNubbly(mercie)\nAwaited(mercie)\nPublicise(pennie, mercie)\nIntroject(pennie, mercie)\nDecolonise(pennie, edna)\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Awaited(x))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, pennie) -> Introject(x, edna))\nforall x (Introject(x, edna) and Publicise(x, mercie) -> Shadowy(edna))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, mercie) and Decolonise(x, edna) -> Publicise(mercie, edna))\nDecolonise(mercie, edna) and Emblematic(edna) -> Publicise(mercie, pennie)\nNubbly(pennie) -> Introject(pennie, edna)\nforall x (Nubbly(x) and Publicise(x, pennie) -> Decolonise(x, edna))\nforall x (Introject(x, edna) -> Publicise(edna, pennie))\n\nPublicise(mercie, pennie)\n\nDecolonise(mercie, edna) and Emblematic(edna) -> Publicise(mercie, pennie) <- forall x (Nubbly(x) and Publicise(x, pennie) -> Decolonise(x, edna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The desiree is threaded. The desiree is purifying. The desiree is landlocked. The desiree poison the marianne. The desiree elute the zonnya. The marianne is mysterious. The marianne is lxxiii. The zonnya footnote the marianne. The zonnya poison the marianne. The zonnya elute the desiree. All threaded things are lxxiii. If something elute the zonnya then it poison the desiree. If something poison the desiree and it footnote the marianne then the desiree is landlocked. If something elute the marianne and it elute the desiree then the marianne footnote the desiree. If the marianne elute the desiree and the desiree is threaded then the marianne footnote the zonnya. If the zonnya is mysterious then the zonnya poison the desiree. If something is mysterious and it footnote the zonnya then it elute the desiree. If something poison the desiree then the desiree footnote the zonnya. The zonnya is not lxxiii.", "logic": "\nThreaded(desiree)\nPurifying(desiree)\nLandlocked(desiree)\nPoison(desiree, marianne)\nElute(desiree, zonnya)\nMysterious(marianne)\nLxxiii(marianne)\nFootnote(zonnya, marianne)\nPoison(zonnya, marianne)\nElute(zonnya, desiree)\nforall x (Threaded(x) -> Lxxiii(x))\nforall x (Elute(x, zonnya) -> Poison(x, desiree))\nforall x (Poison(x, desiree) and Footnote(x, marianne) -> Landlocked(desiree))\nforall x (Elute(x, marianne) and Elute(x, desiree) -> Footnote(marianne, desiree))\nElute(marianne, desiree) and Threaded(desiree) -> Footnote(marianne, zonnya)\nMysterious(zonnya) -> Poison(zonnya, desiree)\nforall x (Mysterious(x) and Footnote(x, zonnya) -> Elute(x, desiree))\nforall x (Poison(x, desiree) -> Footnote(desiree, zonnya))\n\nnot Lxxiii(zonnya)\n\nforall x (Threaded(x) -> Lxxiii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The harriet is wobbly. The harriet is fake. The harriet is tiresome. The harriet charge the renate. The harriet fine the connolly. The renate is campy. The renate is perianal. The connolly cheese the renate. The connolly charge the renate. The connolly fine the harriet. All wobbly things are perianal. If something fine the connolly then it charge the harriet. If something charge the harriet and it cheese the renate then the harriet is tiresome. If something fine the renate and it fine the harriet then the renate cheese the harriet. If the renate fine the harriet and the harriet is wobbly then the renate cheese the connolly. If the connolly is campy then the connolly charge the harriet. If something is campy and it cheese the connolly then it fine the harriet. If something charge the harriet then the harriet cheese the connolly. The connolly is tiresome.", "logic": "\nWobbly(harriet)\nFake(harriet)\nTiresome(harriet)\nCharge(harriet, renate)\nFine(harriet, connolly)\nCampy(renate)\nPerianal(renate)\nCheese(connolly, renate)\nCharge(connolly, renate)\nFine(connolly, harriet)\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Perianal(x))\nforall x (Fine(x, connolly) -> Charge(x, harriet))\nforall x (Charge(x, harriet) and Cheese(x, renate) -> Tiresome(harriet))\nforall x (Fine(x, renate) and Fine(x, harriet) -> Cheese(renate, harriet))\nFine(renate, harriet) and Wobbly(harriet) -> Cheese(renate, connolly)\nCampy(connolly) -> Charge(connolly, harriet)\nforall x (Campy(x) and Cheese(x, connolly) -> Fine(x, harriet))\nforall x (Charge(x, harriet) -> Cheese(harriet, connolly))\n\nTiresome(connolly)\n\nTiresome(connolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The joela is unsocial. The joela is carinated. The joela is dipterous. The joela overprice the yigal. The joela rouse the lilias. The yigal is implacable. The yigal is carinate. The lilias devastate the yigal. The lilias overprice the yigal. The lilias rouse the joela. All unsocial things are carinate. If something rouse the lilias then it overprice the joela. If something overprice the joela and it devastate the yigal then the joela is dipterous. If something rouse the yigal and it rouse the joela then the yigal devastate the joela. If the yigal rouse the joela and the joela is unsocial then the yigal devastate the lilias. If the lilias is implacable then the lilias overprice the joela. If something is implacable and it devastate the lilias then it rouse the joela. If something overprice the joela then the joela devastate the lilias. The joela does not need the lilias.", "logic": "\nUnsocial(joela)\nCarinated(joela)\nDipterous(joela)\nOverprice(joela, yigal)\nRouse(joela, lilias)\nImplacable(yigal)\nCarinate(yigal)\nDevastate(lilias, yigal)\nOverprice(lilias, yigal)\nRouse(lilias, joela)\nforall x (Unsocial(x) -> Carinate(x))\nforall x (Rouse(x, lilias) -> Overprice(x, joela))\nforall x (Overprice(x, joela) and Devastate(x, yigal) -> Dipterous(joela))\nforall x (Rouse(x, yigal) and Rouse(x, joela) -> Devastate(yigal, joela))\nRouse(yigal, joela) and Unsocial(joela) -> Devastate(yigal, lilias)\nImplacable(lilias) -> Overprice(lilias, joela)\nforall x (Implacable(x) and Devastate(x, lilias) -> Rouse(x, joela))\nforall x (Overprice(x, joela) -> Devastate(joela, lilias))\n\nnot Overprice(joela, lilias)\n\nnot Overprice(joela, lilias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The laney is writhed. The laney is tarry. The laney is cretinous. The laney force the dara. The laney orient the carolann. The dara is fraudulent. The dara is seagoing. The carolann prologise the dara. The carolann force the dara. The carolann orient the laney. All writhed things are seagoing. If something orient the carolann then it force the laney. If something force the laney and it prologise the dara then the laney is cretinous. If something orient the dara and it orient the laney then the dara prologise the laney. If the dara orient the laney and the laney is writhed then the dara prologise the carolann. If the carolann is fraudulent then the carolann force the laney. If something is fraudulent and it prologise the carolann then it orient the laney. If something force the laney then the laney prologise the carolann. The carolann is writhed.", "logic": "\nWrithed(laney)\nTarry(laney)\nCretinous(laney)\nForce(laney, dara)\nOrient(laney, carolann)\nFraudulent(dara)\nSeagoing(dara)\nPrologise(carolann, dara)\nForce(carolann, dara)\nOrient(carolann, laney)\nforall x (Writhed(x) -> Seagoing(x))\nforall x (Orient(x, carolann) -> Force(x, laney))\nforall x (Force(x, laney) and Prologise(x, dara) -> Cretinous(laney))\nforall x (Orient(x, dara) and Orient(x, laney) -> Prologise(dara, laney))\nOrient(dara, laney) and Writhed(laney) -> Prologise(dara, carolann)\nFraudulent(carolann) -> Force(carolann, laney)\nforall x (Fraudulent(x) and Prologise(x, carolann) -> Orient(x, laney))\nforall x (Force(x, laney) -> Prologise(laney, carolann))\n\nWrithed(carolann)\n\nWrithed(carolann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1785"} {"premises": "The elwina is tangible. The elwina is bearing. The elwina is polygamous. The elwina is noseless. The elwina is unchained. The elwina legislate the meghann. The elwina battle the meghann. The elwina ordain the meghann. The meghann is tangible. The meghann is bearing. The meghann is polygamous. The meghann is noseless. The meghann is unchained. The meghann legislate the elwina. The meghann battle the elwina. The meghann ordain the elwina. If someone ordain the elwina and the elwina ordain the meghann then the elwina is unchained. If someone is tangible then they visit the elwina. If someone ordain the elwina then they like the elwina. The elwina is unchained.", "logic": "\nTangible(elwina)\nBearing(elwina)\nPolygamous(elwina)\nNoseless(elwina)\nUnchained(elwina)\nLegislate(elwina, meghann)\nBattle(elwina, meghann)\nOrdain(elwina, meghann)\nTangible(meghann)\nBearing(meghann)\nPolygamous(meghann)\nNoseless(meghann)\nUnchained(meghann)\nLegislate(meghann, elwina)\nBattle(meghann, elwina)\nOrdain(meghann, elwina)\nforall x (Ordain(x, elwina) and Ordain(elwina, meghann) -> Unchained(elwina))\nforall x (Tangible(x) -> Ordain(x, elwina))\nforall x (Ordain(x, elwina) -> Legislate(x, elwina))\n\nUnchained(elwina)\n\ntherefore Unchained(elwina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The alejandro is groping. The alejandro is liturgical. The alejandro is tactful. The alejandro is tramontane. The alejandro is fanned. The alejandro crimp the halie. The alejandro holiday the halie. The alejandro taste the halie. The halie is groping. The halie is liturgical. The halie is tactful. The halie is tramontane. The halie is fanned. The halie crimp the alejandro. The halie holiday the alejandro. The halie taste the alejandro. If someone taste the alejandro and the alejandro taste the halie then the alejandro is fanned. If someone is groping then they visit the alejandro. If someone taste the alejandro then they like the alejandro. The halie is not tactful.", "logic": "\nGroping(alejandro)\nLiturgical(alejandro)\nTactful(alejandro)\nTramontane(alejandro)\nFanned(alejandro)\nCrimp(alejandro, halie)\nHoliday(alejandro, halie)\nTaste(alejandro, halie)\nGroping(halie)\nLiturgical(halie)\nTactful(halie)\nTramontane(halie)\nFanned(halie)\nCrimp(halie, alejandro)\nHoliday(halie, alejandro)\nTaste(halie, alejandro)\nforall x (Taste(x, alejandro) and Taste(alejandro, halie) -> Fanned(alejandro))\nforall x (Groping(x) -> Taste(x, alejandro))\nforall x (Taste(x, alejandro) -> Crimp(x, alejandro))\n\nnot Tactful(halie)\n\ntherefore Tactful(halie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The savina is rotatable. The savina is hemostatic. The savina is revolting. The savina is paying. The savina is adulatory. The savina overcrowd the delly. The savina reassign the delly. The savina teeter the delly. The delly is rotatable. The delly is hemostatic. The delly is revolting. The delly is paying. The delly is adulatory. The delly overcrowd the savina. The delly reassign the savina. The delly teeter the savina. If someone teeter the savina and the savina teeter the delly then the savina is adulatory. If someone is rotatable then they visit the savina. If someone teeter the savina then they like the savina. The savina teeter the savina.", "logic": "\nRotatable(savina)\nHemostatic(savina)\nRevolting(savina)\nPaying(savina)\nAdulatory(savina)\nOvercrowd(savina, delly)\nReassign(savina, delly)\nTeeter(savina, delly)\nRotatable(delly)\nHemostatic(delly)\nRevolting(delly)\nPaying(delly)\nAdulatory(delly)\nOvercrowd(delly, savina)\nReassign(delly, savina)\nTeeter(delly, savina)\nforall x (Teeter(x, savina) and Teeter(savina, delly) -> Adulatory(savina))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) -> Teeter(x, savina))\nforall x (Teeter(x, savina) -> Overcrowd(x, savina))\n\nTeeter(savina, savina)\n\nRotatable(savina) and forall x (Rotatable(x) -> Teeter(x, savina)) -> therefore Teeter(savina, savina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The charyl is wiry. The charyl is chinchy. The charyl is twisted. The charyl is indisposed. The charyl is unseen. The charyl bemire the dalila. The charyl bespeckle the dalila. The charyl denitrify the dalila. The dalila is wiry. The dalila is chinchy. The dalila is twisted. The dalila is indisposed. The dalila is unseen. The dalila bemire the charyl. The dalila bespeckle the charyl. The dalila denitrify the charyl. If someone denitrify the charyl and the charyl denitrify the dalila then the charyl is unseen. If someone is wiry then they visit the charyl. If someone denitrify the charyl then they like the charyl. The charyl does not visit the charyl.", "logic": "\nWiry(charyl)\nChinchy(charyl)\nTwisted(charyl)\nIndisposed(charyl)\nUnseen(charyl)\nBemire(charyl, dalila)\nBespeckle(charyl, dalila)\nDenitrify(charyl, dalila)\nWiry(dalila)\nChinchy(dalila)\nTwisted(dalila)\nIndisposed(dalila)\nUnseen(dalila)\nBemire(dalila, charyl)\nBespeckle(dalila, charyl)\nDenitrify(dalila, charyl)\nforall x (Denitrify(x, charyl) and Denitrify(charyl, dalila) -> Unseen(charyl))\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Denitrify(x, charyl))\nforall x (Denitrify(x, charyl) -> Bemire(x, charyl))\n\nnot Denitrify(charyl, charyl)\n\nWiry(charyl) and forall x (Wiry(x) -> Denitrify(x, charyl)) -> therefore Denitrify(charyl, charyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The theodora is seminude. The theodora is rootbound. The theodora is avertible. The theodora is afloat. The theodora is toasted. The theodora reprieve the brita. The theodora flurry the brita. The theodora amount the brita. The brita is seminude. The brita is rootbound. The brita is avertible. The brita is afloat. The brita is toasted. The brita reprieve the theodora. The brita flurry the theodora. The brita amount the theodora. If someone amount the theodora and the theodora amount the brita then the theodora is toasted. If someone is seminude then they visit the theodora. If someone amount the theodora then they like the theodora. The theodora reprieve the theodora.", "logic": "\nSeminude(theodora)\nRootbound(theodora)\nAvertible(theodora)\nAfloat(theodora)\nToasted(theodora)\nReprieve(theodora, brita)\nFlurry(theodora, brita)\nAmount(theodora, brita)\nSeminude(brita)\nRootbound(brita)\nAvertible(brita)\nAfloat(brita)\nToasted(brita)\nReprieve(brita, theodora)\nFlurry(brita, theodora)\nAmount(brita, theodora)\nforall x (Amount(x, theodora) and Amount(theodora, brita) -> Toasted(theodora))\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Amount(x, theodora))\nforall x (Amount(x, theodora) -> Reprieve(x, theodora))\n\nReprieve(theodora, theodora)\n\nSeminude(theodora) and forall x (Seminude(x) -> Amount(x, theodora)) -> therefore Amount(theodora, theodora) Amount(theodora, theodora) and forall x (Amount(x, theodora) -> Reprieve(x, theodora)) -> therefore Reprieve(theodora, theodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The deloria is atrophied. The deloria is decimal. The deloria is horrible. The deloria is ceaseless. The deloria is zippy. The deloria enliven the tine. The deloria reposit the tine. The deloria chime the tine. The tine is atrophied. The tine is decimal. The tine is horrible. The tine is ceaseless. The tine is zippy. The tine enliven the deloria. The tine reposit the deloria. The tine chime the deloria. If someone chime the deloria and the deloria chime the tine then the deloria is zippy. If someone is atrophied then they visit the deloria. If someone chime the deloria then they like the deloria. The deloria does not like the deloria.", "logic": "\nAtrophied(deloria)\nDecimal(deloria)\nHorrible(deloria)\nCeaseless(deloria)\nZippy(deloria)\nEnliven(deloria, tine)\nReposit(deloria, tine)\nChime(deloria, tine)\nAtrophied(tine)\nDecimal(tine)\nHorrible(tine)\nCeaseless(tine)\nZippy(tine)\nEnliven(tine, deloria)\nReposit(tine, deloria)\nChime(tine, deloria)\nforall x (Chime(x, deloria) and Chime(deloria, tine) -> Zippy(deloria))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Chime(x, deloria))\nforall x (Chime(x, deloria) -> Enliven(x, deloria))\n\nnot Enliven(deloria, deloria)\n\nAtrophied(deloria) and forall x (Atrophied(x) -> Chime(x, deloria)) -> therefore Chime(deloria, deloria) Chime(deloria, deloria) and forall x (Chime(x, deloria) -> Enliven(x, deloria)) -> therefore Enliven(deloria, deloria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The roobbie is rhizoidal. The roobbie is wrinkled. The roobbie is possessive. The roobbie is punishing. The roobbie is tramontane. The roobbie blight the yetta. The roobbie madden the yetta. The roobbie automatize the yetta. The yetta is rhizoidal. The yetta is wrinkled. The yetta is possessive. The yetta is punishing. The yetta is tramontane. The yetta blight the roobbie. The yetta madden the roobbie. The yetta automatize the roobbie. If someone automatize the roobbie and the roobbie automatize the yetta then the roobbie is tramontane. If someone is rhizoidal then they visit the roobbie. If someone automatize the roobbie then they like the roobbie. The roobbie does not need the roobbie.", "logic": "\nRhizoidal(roobbie)\nWrinkled(roobbie)\nPossessive(roobbie)\nPunishing(roobbie)\nTramontane(roobbie)\nBlight(roobbie, yetta)\nMadden(roobbie, yetta)\nAutomatize(roobbie, yetta)\nRhizoidal(yetta)\nWrinkled(yetta)\nPossessive(yetta)\nPunishing(yetta)\nTramontane(yetta)\nBlight(yetta, roobbie)\nMadden(yetta, roobbie)\nAutomatize(yetta, roobbie)\nforall x (Automatize(x, roobbie) and Automatize(roobbie, yetta) -> Tramontane(roobbie))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Automatize(x, roobbie))\nforall x (Automatize(x, roobbie) -> Blight(x, roobbie))\n\nnot Madden(roobbie, roobbie)\n\nnot Madden(roobbie, roobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The rhetta is advance. The rhetta is assurgent. The rhetta is unkempt. The rhetta is skew. The rhetta is fused. The rhetta reef the gershon. The rhetta beleaguer the gershon. The rhetta scalp the gershon. The gershon is advance. The gershon is assurgent. The gershon is unkempt. The gershon is skew. The gershon is fused. The gershon reef the rhetta. The gershon beleaguer the rhetta. The gershon scalp the rhetta. If someone scalp the rhetta and the rhetta scalp the gershon then the rhetta is fused. If someone is advance then they visit the rhetta. If someone scalp the rhetta then they like the rhetta. The gershon reef the gershon.", "logic": "\nAdvance(rhetta)\nAssurgent(rhetta)\nUnkempt(rhetta)\nSkew(rhetta)\nFused(rhetta)\nReef(rhetta, gershon)\nBeleaguer(rhetta, gershon)\nScalp(rhetta, gershon)\nAdvance(gershon)\nAssurgent(gershon)\nUnkempt(gershon)\nSkew(gershon)\nFused(gershon)\nReef(gershon, rhetta)\nBeleaguer(gershon, rhetta)\nScalp(gershon, rhetta)\nforall x (Scalp(x, rhetta) and Scalp(rhetta, gershon) -> Fused(rhetta))\nforall x (Advance(x) -> Scalp(x, rhetta))\nforall x (Scalp(x, rhetta) -> Reef(x, rhetta))\n\nReef(gershon, gershon)\n\nReef(gershon, gershon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The clarinda is hirsute. The clarinda is beholden. The clarinda is sable. The clarinda is chipper. The clarinda is metabolous. The clarinda pity the dael. The clarinda parrot the dael. The clarinda inspirit the dael. The dael is hirsute. The dael is beholden. The dael is sable. The dael is chipper. The dael is metabolous. The dael pity the clarinda. The dael parrot the clarinda. The dael inspirit the clarinda. If someone inspirit the clarinda and the clarinda inspirit the dael then the clarinda is metabolous. If someone is hirsute then they visit the clarinda. If someone inspirit the clarinda then they like the clarinda. The dael does not visit the dael.", "logic": "\nHirsute(clarinda)\nBeholden(clarinda)\nSable(clarinda)\nChipper(clarinda)\nMetabolous(clarinda)\nPity(clarinda, dael)\nParrot(clarinda, dael)\nInspirit(clarinda, dael)\nHirsute(dael)\nBeholden(dael)\nSable(dael)\nChipper(dael)\nMetabolous(dael)\nPity(dael, clarinda)\nParrot(dael, clarinda)\nInspirit(dael, clarinda)\nforall x (Inspirit(x, clarinda) and Inspirit(clarinda, dael) -> Metabolous(clarinda))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) -> Inspirit(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Inspirit(x, clarinda) -> Pity(x, clarinda))\n\nnot Inspirit(dael, dael)\n\nnot Inspirit(dael, dael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The ravil is allotropic. The ravil is abatable. The ravil is weepy. The ravil is lewd. The ravil is loathly. The ravil descale the claribel. The ravil reify the claribel. The ravil configure the claribel. The claribel is allotropic. The claribel is abatable. The claribel is weepy. The claribel is lewd. The claribel is loathly. The claribel descale the ravil. The claribel reify the ravil. The claribel configure the ravil. If someone configure the ravil and the ravil configure the claribel then the ravil is loathly. If someone is allotropic then they visit the ravil. If someone configure the ravil then they like the ravil. The claribel reify the claribel.", "logic": "\nAllotropic(ravil)\nAbatable(ravil)\nWeepy(ravil)\nLewd(ravil)\nLoathly(ravil)\nDescale(ravil, claribel)\nReify(ravil, claribel)\nConfigure(ravil, claribel)\nAllotropic(claribel)\nAbatable(claribel)\nWeepy(claribel)\nLewd(claribel)\nLoathly(claribel)\nDescale(claribel, ravil)\nReify(claribel, ravil)\nConfigure(claribel, ravil)\nforall x (Configure(x, ravil) and Configure(ravil, claribel) -> Loathly(ravil))\nforall x (Allotropic(x) -> Configure(x, ravil))\nforall x (Configure(x, ravil) -> Descale(x, ravil))\n\nReify(claribel, claribel)\n\nReify(claribel, claribel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-981"} {"premises": "The lotti is flippant. The chrysa is pitiful. The karleen nutate the chrysa. If something capsule the lotti then the lotti does not visit the chrysa. If the lotti capsule the karleen and the karleen capsule the lotti then the lotti cough the chrysa. If the karleen nutate the chrysa then the karleen is ascendible. If something nutate the chrysa and it capsule the lotti then the chrysa cough the karleen. If something is motive and it does not visit the karleen then the karleen cough the chrysa. If something cough the chrysa and it nutate the chrysa then it is ascendible. If something is ascendible then it is rightist. If something is flippant and it nutate the karleen then it is rightist. The lotti is flippant.", "logic": "\nFlippant(lotti)\nPitiful(chrysa)\nNutate(karleen, chrysa)\nforall x (Capsule(x, lotti) -> not Cough(lotti, chrysa))\nCapsule(lotti, karleen) and Capsule(karleen, lotti) -> Cough(lotti, chrysa)\nNutate(karleen, chrysa) -> Ascendible(karleen)\nforall x (Nutate(x, chrysa) and Capsule(x, lotti) -> Cough(chrysa, karleen))\nforall x (Motive(x) and not Cough(x, karleen) -> Cough(karleen, chrysa))\nforall x (Cough(x, chrysa) and Nutate(x, chrysa) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) -> Rightist(x))\nforall x (Flippant(x) and Nutate(x, karleen) -> Rightist(x))\n\nFlippant(lotti)\n\ntherefore Flippant(lotti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The sonnie is priestlike. The sharona is pricey. The mair tootle the sharona. If something bill the sonnie then the sonnie does not visit the sharona. If the sonnie bill the mair and the mair bill the sonnie then the sonnie ordinate the sharona. If the mair tootle the sharona then the mair is earlyish. If something tootle the sharona and it bill the sonnie then the sharona ordinate the mair. If something is dyspeptic and it does not visit the mair then the mair ordinate the sharona. If something ordinate the sharona and it tootle the sharona then it is earlyish. If something is earlyish then it is postnatal. If something is priestlike and it tootle the mair then it is postnatal. The mair does not chase the sharona.", "logic": "\nPriestlike(sonnie)\nPricey(sharona)\nTootle(mair, sharona)\nforall x (Bill(x, sonnie) -> not Ordinate(sonnie, sharona))\nBill(sonnie, mair) and Bill(mair, sonnie) -> Ordinate(sonnie, sharona)\nTootle(mair, sharona) -> Earlyish(mair)\nforall x (Tootle(x, sharona) and Bill(x, sonnie) -> Ordinate(sharona, mair))\nforall x (Dyspeptic(x) and not Ordinate(x, mair) -> Ordinate(mair, sharona))\nforall x (Ordinate(x, sharona) and Tootle(x, sharona) -> Earlyish(x))\nforall x (Earlyish(x) -> Postnatal(x))\nforall x (Priestlike(x) and Tootle(x, mair) -> Postnatal(x))\n\nnot Tootle(mair, sharona)\n\ntherefore Tootle(mair, sharona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The pablo is duplicate. The adlai is handsewn. The roderigo cartoon the adlai. If something format the pablo then the pablo does not visit the adlai. If the pablo format the roderigo and the roderigo format the pablo then the pablo filibuster the adlai. If the roderigo cartoon the adlai then the roderigo is foremost. If something cartoon the adlai and it format the pablo then the adlai filibuster the roderigo. If something is postexilic and it does not visit the roderigo then the roderigo filibuster the adlai. If something filibuster the adlai and it cartoon the adlai then it is foremost. If something is foremost then it is liege. If something is duplicate and it cartoon the roderigo then it is liege. The roderigo is foremost.", "logic": "\nDuplicate(pablo)\nHandsewn(adlai)\nCartoon(roderigo, adlai)\nforall x (Format(x, pablo) -> not Filibuster(pablo, adlai))\nFormat(pablo, roderigo) and Format(roderigo, pablo) -> Filibuster(pablo, adlai)\nCartoon(roderigo, adlai) -> Foremost(roderigo)\nforall x (Cartoon(x, adlai) and Format(x, pablo) -> Filibuster(adlai, roderigo))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) and not Filibuster(x, roderigo) -> Filibuster(roderigo, adlai))\nforall x (Filibuster(x, adlai) and Cartoon(x, adlai) -> Foremost(x))\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Duplicate(x) and Cartoon(x, roderigo) -> Liege(x))\n\nForemost(roderigo)\n\nCartoon(roderigo, adlai) and Cartoon(roderigo, adlai) -> Foremost(roderigo) -> therefore Foremost(roderigo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The barbey is spinnable. The malissa is folding. The neile thin the malissa. If something salve the barbey then the barbey does not visit the malissa. If the barbey salve the neile and the neile salve the barbey then the barbey mush the malissa. If the neile thin the malissa then the neile is glutinous. If something thin the malissa and it salve the barbey then the malissa mush the neile. If something is sixteenth and it does not visit the neile then the neile mush the malissa. If something mush the malissa and it thin the malissa then it is glutinous. If something is glutinous then it is unfinished. If something is spinnable and it thin the neile then it is unfinished. The neile is not glutinous.", "logic": "\nSpinnable(barbey)\nFolding(malissa)\nThin(neile, malissa)\nforall x (Salve(x, barbey) -> not Mush(barbey, malissa))\nSalve(barbey, neile) and Salve(neile, barbey) -> Mush(barbey, malissa)\nThin(neile, malissa) -> Glutinous(neile)\nforall x (Thin(x, malissa) and Salve(x, barbey) -> Mush(malissa, neile))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) and not Mush(x, neile) -> Mush(neile, malissa))\nforall x (Mush(x, malissa) and Thin(x, malissa) -> Glutinous(x))\nforall x (Glutinous(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) and Thin(x, neile) -> Unfinished(x))\n\nnot Glutinous(neile)\n\nThin(neile, malissa) and Thin(neile, malissa) -> Glutinous(neile) -> therefore Glutinous(neile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The felicdad is alive. The putnam is bonny. The perle lynch the putnam. If something desquamate the felicdad then the felicdad does not visit the putnam. If the felicdad desquamate the perle and the perle desquamate the felicdad then the felicdad collude the putnam. If the perle lynch the putnam then the perle is parky. If something lynch the putnam and it desquamate the felicdad then the putnam collude the perle. If something is acquirable and it does not visit the perle then the perle collude the putnam. If something collude the putnam and it lynch the putnam then it is parky. If something is parky then it is moire. If something is alive and it lynch the perle then it is moire. The perle is moire.", "logic": "\nAlive(felicdad)\nBonny(putnam)\nLynch(perle, putnam)\nforall x (Desquamate(x, felicdad) -> not Collude(felicdad, putnam))\nDesquamate(felicdad, perle) and Desquamate(perle, felicdad) -> Collude(felicdad, putnam)\nLynch(perle, putnam) -> Parky(perle)\nforall x (Lynch(x, putnam) and Desquamate(x, felicdad) -> Collude(putnam, perle))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and not Collude(x, perle) -> Collude(perle, putnam))\nforall x (Collude(x, putnam) and Lynch(x, putnam) -> Parky(x))\nforall x (Parky(x) -> Moire(x))\nforall x (Alive(x) and Lynch(x, perle) -> Moire(x))\n\nMoire(perle)\n\nLynch(perle, putnam) and Lynch(perle, putnam) -> Parky(perle) -> therefore Parky(perle) Parky(perle) and forall x (Parky(x) -> Moire(x)) -> therefore Moire(perle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The heinrich is thieving. The ahmed is ceramic. The vito instrument the ahmed. If something bumble the heinrich then the heinrich does not visit the ahmed. If the heinrich bumble the vito and the vito bumble the heinrich then the heinrich evert the ahmed. If the vito instrument the ahmed then the vito is wearing. If something instrument the ahmed and it bumble the heinrich then the ahmed evert the vito. If something is dreamless and it does not visit the vito then the vito evert the ahmed. If something evert the ahmed and it instrument the ahmed then it is wearing. If something is wearing then it is myelinic. If something is thieving and it instrument the vito then it is myelinic. The vito is not myelinic.", "logic": "\nThieving(heinrich)\nCeramic(ahmed)\nInstrument(vito, ahmed)\nforall x (Bumble(x, heinrich) -> not Evert(heinrich, ahmed))\nBumble(heinrich, vito) and Bumble(vito, heinrich) -> Evert(heinrich, ahmed)\nInstrument(vito, ahmed) -> Wearing(vito)\nforall x (Instrument(x, ahmed) and Bumble(x, heinrich) -> Evert(ahmed, vito))\nforall x (Dreamless(x) and not Evert(x, vito) -> Evert(vito, ahmed))\nforall x (Evert(x, ahmed) and Instrument(x, ahmed) -> Wearing(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) -> Myelinic(x))\nforall x (Thieving(x) and Instrument(x, vito) -> Myelinic(x))\n\nnot Myelinic(vito)\n\nInstrument(vito, ahmed) and Instrument(vito, ahmed) -> Wearing(vito) -> therefore Wearing(vito) Wearing(vito) and forall x (Wearing(x) -> Myelinic(x)) -> therefore Myelinic(vito)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The angy is surly. The marwin is particular. The courtney speckle the marwin. If something palpitate the angy then the angy does not visit the marwin. If the angy palpitate the courtney and the courtney palpitate the angy then the angy graft the marwin. If the courtney speckle the marwin then the courtney is spiderly. If something speckle the marwin and it palpitate the angy then the marwin graft the courtney. If something is liquefied and it does not visit the courtney then the courtney graft the marwin. If something graft the marwin and it speckle the marwin then it is spiderly. If something is spiderly then it is recusant. If something is surly and it speckle the courtney then it is recusant. The marwin does not visit the courtney.", "logic": "\nSurly(angy)\nParticular(marwin)\nSpeckle(courtney, marwin)\nforall x (Palpitate(x, angy) -> not Graft(angy, marwin))\nPalpitate(angy, courtney) and Palpitate(courtney, angy) -> Graft(angy, marwin)\nSpeckle(courtney, marwin) -> Spiderly(courtney)\nforall x (Speckle(x, marwin) and Palpitate(x, angy) -> Graft(marwin, courtney))\nforall x (Liquefied(x) and not Graft(x, courtney) -> Graft(courtney, marwin))\nforall x (Graft(x, marwin) and Speckle(x, marwin) -> Spiderly(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Recusant(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) and Speckle(x, courtney) -> Recusant(x))\n\nnot Graft(marwin, courtney)\n\nforall x (Speckle(x, marwin) and Palpitate(x, angy) -> Graft(marwin, courtney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The honey is talented. The dyana is omani. The enid solemnize the dyana. If something obscure the honey then the honey does not visit the dyana. If the honey obscure the enid and the enid obscure the honey then the honey unbutton the dyana. If the enid solemnize the dyana then the enid is carangid. If something solemnize the dyana and it obscure the honey then the dyana unbutton the enid. If something is mitigated and it does not visit the enid then the enid unbutton the dyana. If something unbutton the dyana and it solemnize the dyana then it is carangid. If something is carangid then it is sprightly. If something is talented and it solemnize the enid then it is sprightly. The honey is sprightly.", "logic": "\nTalented(honey)\nOmani(dyana)\nSolemnize(enid, dyana)\nforall x (Obscure(x, honey) -> not Unbutton(honey, dyana))\nObscure(honey, enid) and Obscure(enid, honey) -> Unbutton(honey, dyana)\nSolemnize(enid, dyana) -> Carangid(enid)\nforall x (Solemnize(x, dyana) and Obscure(x, honey) -> Unbutton(dyana, enid))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) and not Unbutton(x, enid) -> Unbutton(enid, dyana))\nforall x (Unbutton(x, dyana) and Solemnize(x, dyana) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Carangid(x) -> Sprightly(x))\nforall x (Talented(x) and Solemnize(x, enid) -> Sprightly(x))\n\nSprightly(honey)\n\nforall x (Carangid(x) -> Sprightly(x)) <- forall x (Unbutton(x, dyana) and Solemnize(x, dyana) -> Carangid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The elwyn is salving. The debby is aciculate. The clare canvas the debby. If something face the elwyn then the elwyn does not visit the debby. If the elwyn face the clare and the clare face the elwyn then the elwyn josh the debby. If the clare canvas the debby then the clare is audenesque. If something canvas the debby and it face the elwyn then the debby josh the clare. If something is docile and it does not visit the clare then the clare josh the debby. If something josh the debby and it canvas the debby then it is audenesque. If something is audenesque then it is blasting. If something is salving and it canvas the clare then it is blasting. The debby is not audenesque.", "logic": "\nSalving(elwyn)\nAciculate(debby)\nCanvas(clare, debby)\nforall x (Face(x, elwyn) -> not Josh(elwyn, debby))\nFace(elwyn, clare) and Face(clare, elwyn) -> Josh(elwyn, debby)\nCanvas(clare, debby) -> Audenesque(clare)\nforall x (Canvas(x, debby) and Face(x, elwyn) -> Josh(debby, clare))\nforall x (Docile(x) and not Josh(x, clare) -> Josh(clare, debby))\nforall x (Josh(x, debby) and Canvas(x, debby) -> Audenesque(x))\nforall x (Audenesque(x) -> Blasting(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) and Canvas(x, clare) -> Blasting(x))\n\nnot Audenesque(debby)\n\nforall x (Josh(x, debby) and Canvas(x, debby) -> Audenesque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The monique is mechanised. The angelina is uniformed. The leon derange the angelina. If something jaunt the monique then the monique does not visit the angelina. If the monique jaunt the leon and the leon jaunt the monique then the monique labor the angelina. If the leon derange the angelina then the leon is bilateral. If something derange the angelina and it jaunt the monique then the angelina labor the leon. If something is tied and it does not visit the leon then the leon labor the angelina. If something labor the angelina and it derange the angelina then it is bilateral. If something is bilateral then it is kampuchean. If something is mechanised and it derange the leon then it is kampuchean. The angelina derange the angelina.", "logic": "\nMechanised(monique)\nUniformed(angelina)\nDerange(leon, angelina)\nforall x (Jaunt(x, monique) -> not Labor(monique, angelina))\nJaunt(monique, leon) and Jaunt(leon, monique) -> Labor(monique, angelina)\nDerange(leon, angelina) -> Bilateral(leon)\nforall x (Derange(x, angelina) and Jaunt(x, monique) -> Labor(angelina, leon))\nforall x (Tied(x) and not Labor(x, leon) -> Labor(leon, angelina))\nforall x (Labor(x, angelina) and Derange(x, angelina) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Kampuchean(x))\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and Derange(x, leon) -> Kampuchean(x))\n\nDerange(angelina, angelina)\n\nDerange(angelina, angelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The allegra is fossilized. The waldon is permeant. The flossy descant the waldon. If something postpone the allegra then the allegra does not visit the waldon. If the allegra postpone the flossy and the flossy postpone the allegra then the allegra jeer the waldon. If the flossy descant the waldon then the flossy is triune. If something descant the waldon and it postpone the allegra then the waldon jeer the flossy. If something is femoral and it does not visit the flossy then the flossy jeer the waldon. If something jeer the waldon and it descant the waldon then it is triune. If something is triune then it is dyslectic. If something is fossilized and it descant the flossy then it is dyslectic. The allegra does not see the flossy.", "logic": "\nFossilized(allegra)\nPermeant(waldon)\nDescant(flossy, waldon)\nforall x (Postpone(x, allegra) -> not Jeer(allegra, waldon))\nPostpone(allegra, flossy) and Postpone(flossy, allegra) -> Jeer(allegra, waldon)\nDescant(flossy, waldon) -> Triune(flossy)\nforall x (Descant(x, waldon) and Postpone(x, allegra) -> Jeer(waldon, flossy))\nforall x (Femoral(x) and not Jeer(x, flossy) -> Jeer(flossy, waldon))\nforall x (Jeer(x, waldon) and Descant(x, waldon) -> Triune(x))\nforall x (Triune(x) -> Dyslectic(x))\nforall x (Fossilized(x) and Descant(x, flossy) -> Dyslectic(x))\n\nnot Postpone(allegra, flossy)\n\nnot Postpone(allegra, flossy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "The cammie is alien. The verge is ischemic. The ludvig banter the verge. If something coax the cammie then the cammie does not visit the verge. If the cammie coax the ludvig and the ludvig coax the cammie then the cammie reprove the verge. If the ludvig banter the verge then the ludvig is venose. If something banter the verge and it coax the cammie then the verge reprove the ludvig. If something is mucous and it does not visit the ludvig then the ludvig reprove the verge. If something reprove the verge and it banter the verge then it is venose. If something is venose then it is deafening. If something is alien and it banter the ludvig then it is deafening. The cammie reprove the cammie.", "logic": "\nAlien(cammie)\nIschemic(verge)\nBanter(ludvig, verge)\nforall x (Coax(x, cammie) -> not Reprove(cammie, verge))\nCoax(cammie, ludvig) and Coax(ludvig, cammie) -> Reprove(cammie, verge)\nBanter(ludvig, verge) -> Venose(ludvig)\nforall x (Banter(x, verge) and Coax(x, cammie) -> Reprove(verge, ludvig))\nforall x (Mucous(x) and not Reprove(x, ludvig) -> Reprove(ludvig, verge))\nforall x (Reprove(x, verge) and Banter(x, verge) -> Venose(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Deafening(x))\nforall x (Alien(x) and Banter(x, ludvig) -> Deafening(x))\n\nReprove(cammie, cammie)\n\nReprove(cammie, cammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-515"} {"premises": "Garfinkel is ascitic. Chalmers is hearable. Amalle is fugitive. Miguela is umber. All calyculate, umber people are ascitic. If someone is edentate then they are hearable. All ascitic people are ebracteate. If someone is fugitive then they are hearable. Young, ascitic people are calyculate. Kind people are ebracteate. Miguela is umber.", "logic": "\nAscitic(garfinkel)\nHearable(chalmers)\nFugitive(amalle)\nUmber(miguela)\nforall x (Calyculate(x) and Umber(x) -> Ascitic(x))\nforall x (Edentate(x) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> Ebracteate(x))\nforall x (Fugitive(x) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Umber(x) and Ascitic(x) -> Calyculate(x))\nforall x (Hearable(x) -> Ebracteate(x))\n\nUmber(miguela)\n\ntherefore Umber(miguela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Rodge is katari. Pavla is insouciant. Arnold is nazi. Sansone is eatable. All unanimated, eatable people are katari. If someone is strep then they are insouciant. All katari people are tameable. If someone is nazi then they are insouciant. Young, katari people are unanimated. Kind people are tameable. Arnold is not nazi.", "logic": "\nKatari(rodge)\nInsouciant(pavla)\nNazi(arnold)\nEatable(sansone)\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and Eatable(x) -> Katari(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Insouciant(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Nazi(x) -> Insouciant(x))\nforall x (Eatable(x) and Katari(x) -> Unanimated(x))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) -> Tameable(x))\n\nnot Nazi(arnold)\n\ntherefore Nazi(arnold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Melessa is muddied. Cristina is ribless. Pippy is redbrick. Laney is cussed. All editorial, cussed people are muddied. If someone is detestable then they are ribless. All muddied people are elevated. If someone is redbrick then they are ribless. Young, muddied people are editorial. Kind people are elevated. Pippy is ribless.", "logic": "\nMuddied(melessa)\nRibless(cristina)\nRedbrick(pippy)\nCussed(laney)\nforall x (Editorial(x) and Cussed(x) -> Muddied(x))\nforall x (Detestable(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Muddied(x) -> Elevated(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Cussed(x) and Muddied(x) -> Editorial(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Elevated(x))\n\nRibless(pippy)\n\nRedbrick(pippy) and forall x (Redbrick(x) -> Ribless(x)) -> therefore Ribless(pippy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Dorrie is tried. Arthur is ocellated. Aurelie is dentate. Loraine is cowardly. All treeless, cowardly people are tried. If someone is persisting then they are ocellated. All tried people are zoological. If someone is dentate then they are ocellated. Young, tried people are treeless. Kind people are zoological. Dorrie is not zoological.", "logic": "\nTried(dorrie)\nOcellated(arthur)\nDentate(aurelie)\nCowardly(loraine)\nforall x (Treeless(x) and Cowardly(x) -> Tried(x))\nforall x (Persisting(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Tried(x) -> Zoological(x))\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) and Tried(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> Zoological(x))\n\nnot Zoological(dorrie)\n\nTried(dorrie) and forall x (Tried(x) -> Zoological(x)) -> therefore Zoological(dorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Lula is cliched. Pasquale is ordered. Gilligan is maximising. Chester is unsung. All horrible, unsung people are cliched. If someone is nosy then they are ordered. All cliched people are pronged. If someone is maximising then they are ordered. Young, cliched people are horrible. Kind people are pronged. Gilligan is pronged.", "logic": "\nCliched(lula)\nOrdered(pasquale)\nMaximising(gilligan)\nUnsung(chester)\nforall x (Horrible(x) and Unsung(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Nosy(x) -> Ordered(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Pronged(x))\nforall x (Maximising(x) -> Ordered(x))\nforall x (Unsung(x) and Cliched(x) -> Horrible(x))\nforall x (Ordered(x) -> Pronged(x))\n\nPronged(gilligan)\n\nMaximising(gilligan) and forall x (Maximising(x) -> Ordered(x)) -> therefore Ordered(gilligan) Ordered(gilligan) and forall x (Ordered(x) -> Pronged(x)) -> therefore Pronged(gilligan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Wiatt is brickle. Lin is acting. Thornie is inglorious. Kenny is colourless. All sere, colourless people are brickle. If someone is consummate then they are acting. All brickle people are repressive. If someone is inglorious then they are acting. Young, brickle people are sere. Kind people are repressive. Thornie is not repressive.", "logic": "\nBrickle(wiatt)\nActing(lin)\nInglorious(thornie)\nColourless(kenny)\nforall x (Sere(x) and Colourless(x) -> Brickle(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) -> Acting(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) -> Repressive(x))\nforall x (Inglorious(x) -> Acting(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) and Brickle(x) -> Sere(x))\nforall x (Acting(x) -> Repressive(x))\n\nnot Repressive(thornie)\n\nInglorious(thornie) and forall x (Inglorious(x) -> Acting(x)) -> therefore Acting(thornie) Acting(thornie) and forall x (Acting(x) -> Repressive(x)) -> therefore Repressive(thornie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Ofelia is mercerised. Clotilda is delectable. Gera is aquiferous. Mag is windswept. All apothecial, windswept people are mercerised. If someone is prepared then they are delectable. All mercerised people are sallow. If someone is aquiferous then they are delectable. Young, mercerised people are apothecial. Kind people are sallow. Mag is not apothecial.", "logic": "\nMercerised(ofelia)\nDelectable(clotilda)\nAquiferous(gera)\nWindswept(mag)\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Windswept(x) -> Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Delectable(x))\nforall x (Mercerised(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Delectable(x))\nforall x (Windswept(x) and Mercerised(x) -> Apothecial(x))\nforall x (Delectable(x) -> Sallow(x))\n\nnot Apothecial(mag)\n\nforall x (Windswept(x) and Mercerised(x) -> Apothecial(x)) <- forall x (Apothecial(x) and Windswept(x) -> Mercerised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Cristal is amyloidal. Perl is gracile. Chriss is rectified. Donia is classless. All bohemian, classless people are amyloidal. If someone is floral then they are gracile. All amyloidal people are lithesome. If someone is rectified then they are gracile. Young, amyloidal people are bohemian. Kind people are lithesome. Donia is gracile.", "logic": "\nAmyloidal(cristal)\nGracile(perl)\nRectified(chriss)\nClassless(donia)\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Classless(x) -> Amyloidal(x))\nforall x (Floral(x) -> Gracile(x))\nforall x (Amyloidal(x) -> Lithesome(x))\nforall x (Rectified(x) -> Gracile(x))\nforall x (Classless(x) and Amyloidal(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Gracile(x) -> Lithesome(x))\n\nGracile(donia)\n\nforall x (Floral(x) -> Gracile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Brynne is tenderised. Goober is moderne. Claude is unsilenced. Doti is capitulary. All telescopic, capitulary people are tenderised. If someone is overeager then they are moderne. All tenderised people are notable. If someone is unsilenced then they are moderne. Young, tenderised people are telescopic. Kind people are notable. Goober is not tenderised.", "logic": "\nTenderised(brynne)\nModerne(goober)\nUnsilenced(claude)\nCapitulary(doti)\nforall x (Telescopic(x) and Capitulary(x) -> Tenderised(x))\nforall x (Overeager(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Tenderised(x) -> Notable(x))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Capitulary(x) and Tenderised(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Notable(x))\n\nnot Tenderised(goober)\n\nforall x (Telescopic(x) and Capitulary(x) -> Tenderised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Gratia is scholarly. Karol is shaky. Rodolphe is anaerobic. Ernest is nonechoic. All leeward, nonechoic people are scholarly. If someone is unworthy then they are shaky. All scholarly people are circadian. If someone is anaerobic then they are shaky. Young, scholarly people are leeward. Kind people are circadian. Ernest is unworthy.", "logic": "\nScholarly(gratia)\nShaky(karol)\nAnaerobic(rodolphe)\nNonechoic(ernest)\nforall x (Leeward(x) and Nonechoic(x) -> Scholarly(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Shaky(x))\nforall x (Scholarly(x) -> Circadian(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Shaky(x))\nforall x (Nonechoic(x) and Scholarly(x) -> Leeward(x))\nforall x (Shaky(x) -> Circadian(x))\n\nUnworthy(ernest)\n\nUnworthy(ernest) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Alanna is amok. Blare is oecumenic. Gianina is showy. Denise is overmuch. All crownless, overmuch people are amok. If someone is refractile then they are oecumenic. All amok people are neuroglial. If someone is showy then they are oecumenic. Young, amok people are crownless. Kind people are neuroglial. Alanna is not refractile.", "logic": "\nAmok(alanna)\nOecumenic(blare)\nShowy(gianina)\nOvermuch(denise)\nforall x (Crownless(x) and Overmuch(x) -> Amok(x))\nforall x (Refractile(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Amok(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Showy(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Overmuch(x) and Amok(x) -> Crownless(x))\nforall x (Oecumenic(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\n\nnot Refractile(alanna)\n\nnot Refractile(alanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Louisa is hindustani. Rand is spermous. Dena is loquacious. Mabelle is gingery. All papistic, gingery people are hindustani. If someone is nonionised then they are spermous. All hindustani people are foul. If someone is loquacious then they are spermous. Young, hindustani people are papistic. Kind people are foul. Rand is nonionised.", "logic": "\nHindustani(louisa)\nSpermous(rand)\nLoquacious(dena)\nGingery(mabelle)\nforall x (Papistic(x) and Gingery(x) -> Hindustani(x))\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Spermous(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) -> Foul(x))\nforall x (Loquacious(x) -> Spermous(x))\nforall x (Gingery(x) and Hindustani(x) -> Papistic(x))\nforall x (Spermous(x) -> Foul(x))\n\nNonionised(rand)\n\nNonionised(rand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Eduardo is not blastular. Eduardo is mendacious. Eduardo is kosher. Eduardo is coaxial. Whit is blastular. Whit is not endurable. Whit is unplowed. Charmane is mendacious. Charmane is kosher. Charmane is coaxial. Charmane is not endurable. Charmane is not unplowed. Pollyanna is blastular. Pollyanna is kosher. Pollyanna is unplowed. Young things are coaxial. All coaxial, blastular things are not endurable. If something is endurable and airsick then it is unplowed. Charmane is coaxial.", "logic": "\nnot Blastular(eduardo)\nMendacious(eduardo)\nKosher(eduardo)\nCoaxial(eduardo)\nBlastular(whit)\nnot Endurable(whit)\nUnplowed(whit)\nMendacious(charmane)\nKosher(charmane)\nCoaxial(charmane)\nnot Endurable(charmane)\nnot Unplowed(charmane)\nBlastular(pollyanna)\nKosher(pollyanna)\nUnplowed(pollyanna)\nforall x (Unplowed(x) -> Coaxial(x))\nforall x (Coaxial(x) and Blastular(x) -> not Endurable(x))\nforall x (Endurable(x) and Airsick(x) -> Unplowed(x))\n\nCoaxial(charmane)\n\ntherefore Coaxial(charmane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Rhoda is not falconine. Rhoda is world. Rhoda is lxxx. Rhoda is allopatric. Dorise is falconine. Dorise is not blusterous. Dorise is down. Ashely is world. Ashely is lxxx. Ashely is allopatric. Ashely is not blusterous. Ashely is not down. Oran is falconine. Oran is lxxx. Oran is down. Young things are allopatric. All allopatric, falconine things are not blusterous. If something is blusterous and tenanted then it is down. Rhoda is not allopatric.", "logic": "\nnot Falconine(rhoda)\nWorld(rhoda)\nLxxx(rhoda)\nAllopatric(rhoda)\nFalconine(dorise)\nnot Blusterous(dorise)\nDown(dorise)\nWorld(ashely)\nLxxx(ashely)\nAllopatric(ashely)\nnot Blusterous(ashely)\nnot Down(ashely)\nFalconine(oran)\nLxxx(oran)\nDown(oran)\nforall x (Down(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) and Falconine(x) -> not Blusterous(x))\nforall x (Blusterous(x) and Tenanted(x) -> Down(x))\n\nnot Allopatric(rhoda)\n\ntherefore Allopatric(rhoda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Marissa is not typic. Marissa is reassured. Marissa is umptieth. Marissa is vixenish. Elsa is typic. Elsa is not velvet. Elsa is unhearable. Bendite is reassured. Bendite is umptieth. Bendite is vixenish. Bendite is not velvet. Bendite is not unhearable. Jenni is typic. Jenni is umptieth. Jenni is unhearable. Young things are vixenish. All vixenish, typic things are not velvet. If something is velvet and coniferous then it is unhearable. Elsa is vixenish.", "logic": "\nnot Typic(marissa)\nReassured(marissa)\nUmptieth(marissa)\nVixenish(marissa)\nTypic(elsa)\nnot Velvet(elsa)\nUnhearable(elsa)\nReassured(bendite)\nUmptieth(bendite)\nVixenish(bendite)\nnot Velvet(bendite)\nnot Unhearable(bendite)\nTypic(jenni)\nUmptieth(jenni)\nUnhearable(jenni)\nforall x (Unhearable(x) -> Vixenish(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) and Typic(x) -> not Velvet(x))\nforall x (Velvet(x) and Coniferous(x) -> Unhearable(x))\n\nVixenish(elsa)\n\nUnhearable(elsa) and forall x (Unhearable(x) -> Vixenish(x)) -> therefore Vixenish(elsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Abel is not neoliberal. Abel is hardfisted. Abel is stretchy. Abel is polygynous. Erick is neoliberal. Erick is not polygynous. Erick is evidential. Maxwell is hardfisted. Maxwell is stretchy. Maxwell is polygynous. Maxwell is not polygynous. Maxwell is not evidential. Brodie is neoliberal. Brodie is stretchy. Brodie is evidential. Young things are polygynous. All polygynous, neoliberal things are not polygynous. If something is polygynous and bilinear then it is evidential. Brodie is not polygynous.", "logic": "\nnot Neoliberal(abel)\nHardfisted(abel)\nStretchy(abel)\nPolygynous(abel)\nNeoliberal(erick)\nnot Polygynous(erick)\nEvidential(erick)\nHardfisted(maxwell)\nStretchy(maxwell)\nPolygynous(maxwell)\nnot Polygynous(maxwell)\nnot Evidential(maxwell)\nNeoliberal(brodie)\nStretchy(brodie)\nEvidential(brodie)\nforall x (Evidential(x) -> Polygynous(x))\nforall x (Polygynous(x) and Neoliberal(x) -> not Polygynous(x))\nforall x (Polygynous(x) and Bilinear(x) -> Evidential(x))\n\nnot Polygynous(brodie)\n\nEvidential(brodie) and forall x (Evidential(x) -> Polygynous(x)) -> therefore Polygynous(brodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Harli is not wondering. Harli is threatened. Harli is injurious. Harli is regulative. Ebenezer is wondering. Ebenezer is not slavelike. Ebenezer is weary. Candis is threatened. Candis is injurious. Candis is regulative. Candis is not slavelike. Candis is not weary. Orly is wondering. Orly is injurious. Orly is weary. Young things are regulative. All regulative, wondering things are not slavelike. If something is slavelike and haunting then it is weary. Orly is not slavelike.", "logic": "\nnot Wondering(harli)\nThreatened(harli)\nInjurious(harli)\nRegulative(harli)\nWondering(ebenezer)\nnot Slavelike(ebenezer)\nWeary(ebenezer)\nThreatened(candis)\nInjurious(candis)\nRegulative(candis)\nnot Slavelike(candis)\nnot Weary(candis)\nWondering(orly)\nInjurious(orly)\nWeary(orly)\nforall x (Weary(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Regulative(x) and Wondering(x) -> not Slavelike(x))\nforall x (Slavelike(x) and Haunting(x) -> Weary(x))\n\nnot Slavelike(orly)\n\nWeary(orly) and forall x (Weary(x) -> Regulative(x)) -> therefore Regulative(orly) Regulative(orly) and Wondering(orly) and forall x (Regulative(x) and Wondering(x) -> not Slavelike(x)) -> therefore not Slavelike(orly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Valencia is not adagio. Valencia is unwilling. Valencia is debasing. Valencia is flukey. Winifred is adagio. Winifred is not axial. Winifred is south. Art is unwilling. Art is debasing. Art is flukey. Art is not axial. Art is not south. Vally is adagio. Vally is debasing. Vally is south. Young things are flukey. All flukey, adagio things are not axial. If something is axial and dormie then it is south. Vally is axial.", "logic": "\nnot Adagio(valencia)\nUnwilling(valencia)\nDebasing(valencia)\nFlukey(valencia)\nAdagio(winifred)\nnot Axial(winifred)\nSouth(winifred)\nUnwilling(art)\nDebasing(art)\nFlukey(art)\nnot Axial(art)\nnot South(art)\nAdagio(vally)\nDebasing(vally)\nSouth(vally)\nforall x (South(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Flukey(x) and Adagio(x) -> not Axial(x))\nforall x (Axial(x) and Dormie(x) -> South(x))\n\nAxial(vally)\n\nSouth(vally) and forall x (South(x) -> Flukey(x)) -> therefore Flukey(vally) Flukey(vally) and Adagio(vally) and forall x (Flukey(x) and Adagio(x) -> not Axial(x)) -> therefore not Axial(vally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Timothee is not untroubled. Timothee is motional. Timothee is thriving. Timothee is apophatic. Osmond is untroubled. Osmond is not egregious. Osmond is colonized. Angelika is motional. Angelika is thriving. Angelika is apophatic. Angelika is not egregious. Angelika is not colonized. Miriam is untroubled. Miriam is thriving. Miriam is colonized. Young things are apophatic. All apophatic, untroubled things are not egregious. If something is egregious and heavyset then it is colonized. Timothee is not colonized.", "logic": "\nnot Untroubled(timothee)\nMotional(timothee)\nThriving(timothee)\nApophatic(timothee)\nUntroubled(osmond)\nnot Egregious(osmond)\nColonized(osmond)\nMotional(angelika)\nThriving(angelika)\nApophatic(angelika)\nnot Egregious(angelika)\nnot Colonized(angelika)\nUntroubled(miriam)\nThriving(miriam)\nColonized(miriam)\nforall x (Colonized(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) and Untroubled(x) -> not Egregious(x))\nforall x (Egregious(x) and Heavyset(x) -> Colonized(x))\n\nnot Colonized(timothee)\n\nforall x (Egregious(x) and Heavyset(x) -> Colonized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Monty is not panegyric. Monty is overjoyed. Monty is assorted. Monty is former. Quinton is panegyric. Quinton is not yeastlike. Quinton is removable. Marni is overjoyed. Marni is assorted. Marni is former. Marni is not yeastlike. Marni is not removable. Esther is panegyric. Esther is assorted. Esther is removable. Young things are former. All former, panegyric things are not yeastlike. If something is yeastlike and inviolable then it is removable. Esther is inviolable.", "logic": "\nnot Panegyric(monty)\nOverjoyed(monty)\nAssorted(monty)\nFormer(monty)\nPanegyric(quinton)\nnot Yeastlike(quinton)\nRemovable(quinton)\nOverjoyed(marni)\nAssorted(marni)\nFormer(marni)\nnot Yeastlike(marni)\nnot Removable(marni)\nPanegyric(esther)\nAssorted(esther)\nRemovable(esther)\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Former(x))\nforall x (Former(x) and Panegyric(x) -> not Yeastlike(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) and Inviolable(x) -> Removable(x))\n\nInviolable(esther)\n\nInviolable(esther) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Willa is not chechen. Willa is ruandan. Willa is silvery. Willa is medullated. Marlowe is chechen. Marlowe is not pithy. Marlowe is monoclinic. Kettie is ruandan. Kettie is silvery. Kettie is medullated. Kettie is not pithy. Kettie is not monoclinic. Ervin is chechen. Ervin is silvery. Ervin is monoclinic. Young things are medullated. All medullated, chechen things are not pithy. If something is pithy and foregoing then it is monoclinic. Marlowe is not ruandan.", "logic": "\nnot Chechen(willa)\nRuandan(willa)\nSilvery(willa)\nMedullated(willa)\nChechen(marlowe)\nnot Pithy(marlowe)\nMonoclinic(marlowe)\nRuandan(kettie)\nSilvery(kettie)\nMedullated(kettie)\nnot Pithy(kettie)\nnot Monoclinic(kettie)\nChechen(ervin)\nSilvery(ervin)\nMonoclinic(ervin)\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) -> Medullated(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) and Chechen(x) -> not Pithy(x))\nforall x (Pithy(x) and Foregoing(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\n\nnot Ruandan(marlowe)\n\nnot Ruandan(marlowe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Maible is not advective. Maible is memorable. Maible is thyrotoxic. Maible is discoidal. Gwennie is advective. Gwennie is not peregrine. Gwennie is downy. Babara is memorable. Babara is thyrotoxic. Babara is discoidal. Babara is not peregrine. Babara is not downy. Jillayne is advective. Jillayne is thyrotoxic. Jillayne is downy. Young things are discoidal. All discoidal, advective things are not peregrine. If something is peregrine and brag then it is downy. Babara is brag.", "logic": "\nnot Advective(maible)\nMemorable(maible)\nThyrotoxic(maible)\nDiscoidal(maible)\nAdvective(gwennie)\nnot Peregrine(gwennie)\nDowny(gwennie)\nMemorable(babara)\nThyrotoxic(babara)\nDiscoidal(babara)\nnot Peregrine(babara)\nnot Downy(babara)\nAdvective(jillayne)\nThyrotoxic(jillayne)\nDowny(jillayne)\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Discoidal(x))\nforall x (Discoidal(x) and Advective(x) -> not Peregrine(x))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) and Brag(x) -> Downy(x))\n\nBrag(babara)\n\nBrag(babara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Udale is not placental. Udale is lxxxi. Udale is aspherical. Udale is soundproof. Ninon is placental. Ninon is not pasteurian. Ninon is seaworthy. Kaja is lxxxi. Kaja is aspherical. Kaja is soundproof. Kaja is not pasteurian. Kaja is not seaworthy. Stefan is placental. Stefan is aspherical. Stefan is seaworthy. Young things are soundproof. All soundproof, placental things are not pasteurian. If something is pasteurian and kindred then it is seaworthy. Ninon is not kindred.", "logic": "\nnot Placental(udale)\nLxxxi(udale)\nAspherical(udale)\nSoundproof(udale)\nPlacental(ninon)\nnot Pasteurian(ninon)\nSeaworthy(ninon)\nLxxxi(kaja)\nAspherical(kaja)\nSoundproof(kaja)\nnot Pasteurian(kaja)\nnot Seaworthy(kaja)\nPlacental(stefan)\nAspherical(stefan)\nSeaworthy(stefan)\nforall x (Seaworthy(x) -> Soundproof(x))\nforall x (Soundproof(x) and Placental(x) -> not Pasteurian(x))\nforall x (Pasteurian(x) and Kindred(x) -> Seaworthy(x))\n\nnot Kindred(ninon)\n\nnot Kindred(ninon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "Fiorenze is not monthlong. Fiorenze is orderly. Fiorenze is endergonic. Fiorenze is hieratical. Allina is monthlong. Allina is not betting. Allina is groovy. Roana is orderly. Roana is endergonic. Roana is hieratical. Roana is not betting. Roana is not groovy. Garfield is monthlong. Garfield is endergonic. Garfield is groovy. Young things are hieratical. All hieratical, monthlong things are not betting. If something is betting and oral then it is groovy. Fiorenze is betting.", "logic": "\nnot Monthlong(fiorenze)\nOrderly(fiorenze)\nEndergonic(fiorenze)\nHieratical(fiorenze)\nMonthlong(allina)\nnot Betting(allina)\nGroovy(allina)\nOrderly(roana)\nEndergonic(roana)\nHieratical(roana)\nnot Betting(roana)\nnot Groovy(roana)\nMonthlong(garfield)\nEndergonic(garfield)\nGroovy(garfield)\nforall x (Groovy(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Monthlong(x) -> not Betting(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) and Oral(x) -> Groovy(x))\n\nBetting(fiorenze)\n\nBetting(fiorenze) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2256"} {"premises": "The adolphe is persistent. The adolphe is verifiable. The adolphe is unfathomed. The adolphe is absorbable. The adolphe is feeble. The adolphe hail the abraham. The adolphe ding the abraham. The adolphe squeegee the abraham. The abraham is persistent. The abraham is verifiable. The abraham is unfathomed. The abraham is feeble. The abraham hail the adolphe. The abraham ding the adolphe. The abraham squeegee the adolphe. If someone hail the adolphe then they like the abraham. Red people are feeble. If someone squeegee the abraham and they like the adolphe then the adolphe is feeble. If someone is verifiable then they need the abraham. If someone ding the adolphe and they like the adolphe then they like the abraham. If someone hail the abraham then they visit the adolphe. If someone is feeble then they like the adolphe. If someone hail the abraham and they like the adolphe then they are absorbable. The abraham is feeble.", "logic": "\nPersistent(adolphe)\nVerifiable(adolphe)\nUnfathomed(adolphe)\nAbsorbable(adolphe)\nFeeble(adolphe)\nHail(adolphe, abraham)\nDing(adolphe, abraham)\nSqueegee(adolphe, abraham)\nPersistent(abraham)\nVerifiable(abraham)\nUnfathomed(abraham)\nFeeble(abraham)\nHail(abraham, adolphe)\nDing(abraham, adolphe)\nSqueegee(abraham, adolphe)\nforall x (Hail(x, adolphe) -> Hail(x, abraham))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Feeble(x))\nforall x (Squeegee(x, abraham) and Hail(x, adolphe) -> Feeble(adolphe))\nforall x (Verifiable(x) -> Ding(x, abraham))\nforall x (Ding(x, adolphe) and Hail(x, adolphe) -> Hail(x, abraham))\nforall x (Hail(x, abraham) -> Squeegee(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Feeble(x) -> Hail(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Hail(x, abraham) and Hail(x, adolphe) -> Absorbable(x))\n\nFeeble(abraham)\n\ntherefore Feeble(abraham)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "The aura is sikh. The aura is upright. The aura is covert. The aura is comburent. The aura is heady. The aura excite the hirsch. The aura remit the hirsch. The aura unleash the hirsch. The hirsch is sikh. The hirsch is upright. The hirsch is covert. The hirsch is heady. The hirsch excite the aura. The hirsch remit the aura. The hirsch unleash the aura. If someone excite the aura then they like the hirsch. Red people are heady. If someone unleash the hirsch and they like the aura then the aura is heady. If someone is upright then they need the hirsch. If someone remit the aura and they like the aura then they like the hirsch. If someone excite the hirsch then they visit the aura. If someone is heady then they like the aura. If someone excite the hirsch and they like the aura then they are comburent. The hirsch is not heady.", "logic": "\nSikh(aura)\nUpright(aura)\nCovert(aura)\nComburent(aura)\nHeady(aura)\nExcite(aura, hirsch)\nRemit(aura, hirsch)\nUnleash(aura, hirsch)\nSikh(hirsch)\nUpright(hirsch)\nCovert(hirsch)\nHeady(hirsch)\nExcite(hirsch, aura)\nRemit(hirsch, aura)\nUnleash(hirsch, aura)\nforall x (Excite(x, aura) -> Excite(x, hirsch))\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Unleash(x, hirsch) and Excite(x, aura) -> Heady(aura))\nforall x (Upright(x) -> Remit(x, hirsch))\nforall x (Remit(x, aura) and Excite(x, aura) -> Excite(x, hirsch))\nforall x (Excite(x, hirsch) -> Unleash(x, aura))\nforall x (Heady(x) -> Excite(x, aura))\nforall x (Excite(x, hirsch) and Excite(x, aura) -> Comburent(x))\n\nnot Heady(hirsch)\n\ntherefore Heady(hirsch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "The gavrielle is absorbent. The gavrielle is suited. The gavrielle is scruffy. The gavrielle is adult. The gavrielle is fatigued. The gavrielle commutate the eustacia. The gavrielle supply the eustacia. The gavrielle bond the eustacia. The eustacia is absorbent. The eustacia is suited. The eustacia is scruffy. The eustacia is fatigued. The eustacia commutate the gavrielle. The eustacia supply the gavrielle. The eustacia bond the gavrielle. If someone commutate the gavrielle then they like the eustacia. Red people are fatigued. If someone bond the eustacia and they like the gavrielle then the gavrielle is fatigued. If someone is suited then they need the eustacia. If someone supply the gavrielle and they like the gavrielle then they like the eustacia. If someone commutate the eustacia then they visit the gavrielle. If someone is fatigued then they like the gavrielle. If someone commutate the eustacia and they like the gavrielle then they are adult. The eustacia supply the eustacia.", "logic": "\nAbsorbent(gavrielle)\nSuited(gavrielle)\nScruffy(gavrielle)\nAdult(gavrielle)\nFatigued(gavrielle)\nCommutate(gavrielle, eustacia)\nSupply(gavrielle, eustacia)\nBond(gavrielle, eustacia)\nAbsorbent(eustacia)\nSuited(eustacia)\nScruffy(eustacia)\nFatigued(eustacia)\nCommutate(eustacia, gavrielle)\nSupply(eustacia, gavrielle)\nBond(eustacia, gavrielle)\nforall x (Commutate(x, gavrielle) -> Commutate(x, eustacia))\nforall x (Adult(x) -> Fatigued(x))\nforall x (Bond(x, eustacia) and Commutate(x, gavrielle) -> Fatigued(gavrielle))\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Supply(x, eustacia))\nforall x (Supply(x, gavrielle) and Commutate(x, gavrielle) -> Commutate(x, eustacia))\nforall x (Commutate(x, eustacia) -> Bond(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Fatigued(x) -> Commutate(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Commutate(x, eustacia) and Commutate(x, gavrielle) -> Adult(x))\n\nSupply(eustacia, eustacia)\n\nSuited(eustacia) and forall x (Suited(x) -> Supply(x, eustacia)) -> therefore Supply(eustacia, eustacia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "The tracy is hardfisted. The tracy is vaulted. The tracy is freudian. The tracy is fatherless. The tracy is owlish. The tracy gore the alfonse. The tracy repudiate the alfonse. The tracy vamp the alfonse. The alfonse is hardfisted. The alfonse is vaulted. The alfonse is freudian. The alfonse is owlish. The alfonse gore the tracy. The alfonse repudiate the tracy. The alfonse vamp the tracy. If someone gore the tracy then they like the alfonse. Red people are owlish. If someone vamp the alfonse and they like the tracy then the tracy is owlish. If someone is vaulted then they need the alfonse. If someone repudiate the tracy and they like the tracy then they like the alfonse. If someone gore the alfonse then they visit the tracy. If someone is owlish then they like the tracy. If someone gore the alfonse and they like the tracy then they are fatherless. The alfonse does not need the alfonse.", "logic": "\nHardfisted(tracy)\nVaulted(tracy)\nFreudian(tracy)\nFatherless(tracy)\nOwlish(tracy)\nGore(tracy, alfonse)\nRepudiate(tracy, alfonse)\nVamp(tracy, alfonse)\nHardfisted(alfonse)\nVaulted(alfonse)\nFreudian(alfonse)\nOwlish(alfonse)\nGore(alfonse, tracy)\nRepudiate(alfonse, tracy)\nVamp(alfonse, tracy)\nforall x (Gore(x, tracy) -> Gore(x, alfonse))\nforall x (Fatherless(x) -> Owlish(x))\nforall x (Vamp(x, alfonse) and Gore(x, tracy) -> Owlish(tracy))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) -> Repudiate(x, alfonse))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, tracy) and Gore(x, tracy) -> Gore(x, alfonse))\nforall x (Gore(x, alfonse) -> Vamp(x, tracy))\nforall x (Owlish(x) -> Gore(x, tracy))\nforall x (Gore(x, alfonse) and Gore(x, tracy) -> Fatherless(x))\n\nnot Repudiate(alfonse, alfonse)\n\nVaulted(alfonse) and forall x (Vaulted(x) -> Repudiate(x, alfonse)) -> therefore Repudiate(alfonse, alfonse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "The maye is irish. The maye is clockwise. The maye is stately. The maye is ambulant. The maye is symmetric. The maye cartwheel the fernande. The maye unharness the fernande. The maye bloviate the fernande. The fernande is irish. The fernande is clockwise. The fernande is stately. The fernande is symmetric. The fernande cartwheel the maye. The fernande unharness the maye. The fernande bloviate the maye. If someone cartwheel the maye then they like the fernande. Red people are symmetric. If someone bloviate the fernande and they like the maye then the maye is symmetric. If someone is clockwise then they need the fernande. If someone unharness the maye and they like the maye then they like the fernande. If someone cartwheel the fernande then they visit the maye. If someone is symmetric then they like the maye. If someone cartwheel the fernande and they like the maye then they are ambulant. The fernande is ambulant.", "logic": "\nIrish(maye)\nClockwise(maye)\nStately(maye)\nAmbulant(maye)\nSymmetric(maye)\nCartwheel(maye, fernande)\nUnharness(maye, fernande)\nBloviate(maye, fernande)\nIrish(fernande)\nClockwise(fernande)\nStately(fernande)\nSymmetric(fernande)\nCartwheel(fernande, maye)\nUnharness(fernande, maye)\nBloviate(fernande, maye)\nforall x (Cartwheel(x, maye) -> Cartwheel(x, fernande))\nforall x (Ambulant(x) -> Symmetric(x))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, fernande) and Cartwheel(x, maye) -> Symmetric(maye))\nforall x (Clockwise(x) -> Unharness(x, fernande))\nforall x (Unharness(x, maye) and Cartwheel(x, maye) -> Cartwheel(x, fernande))\nforall x (Cartwheel(x, fernande) -> Bloviate(x, maye))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Cartwheel(x, maye))\nforall x (Cartwheel(x, fernande) and Cartwheel(x, maye) -> Ambulant(x))\n\nAmbulant(fernande)\n\nCartwheel(fernande, maye) and forall x (Cartwheel(x, maye) -> Cartwheel(x, fernande)) -> therefore Cartwheel(fernande, fernande) Cartwheel(fernande, fernande) and Cartwheel(fernande, maye) and forall x (Cartwheel(x, fernande) and Cartwheel(x, maye) -> Ambulant(x)) -> therefore Ambulant(fernande)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "The powell is actuating. The powell is carefree. The powell is unweaned. The powell is statute. The powell is overripe. The powell overwrite the kathlene. The powell stonewall the kathlene. The powell frock the kathlene. The kathlene is actuating. The kathlene is carefree. The kathlene is unweaned. The kathlene is overripe. The kathlene overwrite the powell. The kathlene stonewall the powell. The kathlene frock the powell. If someone overwrite the powell then they like the kathlene. Red people are overripe. If someone frock the kathlene and they like the powell then the powell is overripe. If someone is carefree then they need the kathlene. If someone stonewall the powell and they like the powell then they like the kathlene. If someone overwrite the kathlene then they visit the powell. If someone is overripe then they like the powell. If someone overwrite the kathlene and they like the powell then they are statute. The kathlene is not statute.", "logic": "\nActuating(powell)\nCarefree(powell)\nUnweaned(powell)\nStatute(powell)\nOverripe(powell)\nOverwrite(powell, kathlene)\nStonewall(powell, kathlene)\nFrock(powell, kathlene)\nActuating(kathlene)\nCarefree(kathlene)\nUnweaned(kathlene)\nOverripe(kathlene)\nOverwrite(kathlene, powell)\nStonewall(kathlene, powell)\nFrock(kathlene, powell)\nforall x (Overwrite(x, powell) -> Overwrite(x, kathlene))\nforall x (Statute(x) -> Overripe(x))\nforall x (Frock(x, kathlene) and Overwrite(x, powell) -> Overripe(powell))\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Stonewall(x, kathlene))\nforall x (Stonewall(x, powell) and Overwrite(x, powell) -> Overwrite(x, kathlene))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, kathlene) -> Frock(x, powell))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Overwrite(x, powell))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, kathlene) and Overwrite(x, powell) -> Statute(x))\n\nnot Statute(kathlene)\n\nOverwrite(kathlene, powell) and forall x (Overwrite(x, powell) -> Overwrite(x, kathlene)) -> therefore Overwrite(kathlene, kathlene) Overwrite(kathlene, kathlene) and Overwrite(kathlene, powell) and forall x (Overwrite(x, kathlene) and Overwrite(x, powell) -> Statute(x)) -> therefore Statute(kathlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "The zora is ageless. The zora is adroit. The zora is tracked. The zora is ulcerous. The zora is desired. The zora monetise the hewie. The zora yowl the hewie. The zora cranch the hewie. The hewie is ageless. The hewie is adroit. The hewie is tracked. The hewie is desired. The hewie monetise the zora. The hewie yowl the zora. The hewie cranch the zora. If someone monetise the zora then they like the hewie. Red people are desired. If someone cranch the hewie and they like the zora then the zora is desired. If someone is adroit then they need the hewie. If someone yowl the zora and they like the zora then they like the hewie. If someone monetise the hewie then they visit the zora. If someone is desired then they like the zora. If someone monetise the hewie and they like the zora then they are ulcerous. The hewie does not visit the hewie.", "logic": "\nAgeless(zora)\nAdroit(zora)\nTracked(zora)\nUlcerous(zora)\nDesired(zora)\nMonetise(zora, hewie)\nYowl(zora, hewie)\nCranch(zora, hewie)\nAgeless(hewie)\nAdroit(hewie)\nTracked(hewie)\nDesired(hewie)\nMonetise(hewie, zora)\nYowl(hewie, zora)\nCranch(hewie, zora)\nforall x (Monetise(x, zora) -> Monetise(x, hewie))\nforall x (Ulcerous(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Cranch(x, hewie) and Monetise(x, zora) -> Desired(zora))\nforall x (Adroit(x) -> Yowl(x, hewie))\nforall x (Yowl(x, zora) and Monetise(x, zora) -> Monetise(x, hewie))\nforall x (Monetise(x, hewie) -> Cranch(x, zora))\nforall x (Desired(x) -> Monetise(x, zora))\nforall x (Monetise(x, hewie) and Monetise(x, zora) -> Ulcerous(x))\n\nnot Cranch(hewie, hewie)\n\nnot Cranch(hewie, hewie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "The trace is zimbabwean. The trace is sweeping. The trace is phobic. The trace is stark. The trace is mistakable. The trace empurple the jabez. The trace bollix the jabez. The trace swivel the jabez. The jabez is zimbabwean. The jabez is sweeping. The jabez is phobic. The jabez is mistakable. The jabez empurple the trace. The jabez bollix the trace. The jabez swivel the trace. If someone empurple the trace then they like the jabez. Red people are mistakable. If someone swivel the jabez and they like the trace then the trace is mistakable. If someone is sweeping then they need the jabez. If someone bollix the trace and they like the trace then they like the jabez. If someone empurple the jabez then they visit the trace. If someone is mistakable then they like the trace. If someone empurple the jabez and they like the trace then they are stark. The trace bollix the trace.", "logic": "\nZimbabwean(trace)\nSweeping(trace)\nPhobic(trace)\nStark(trace)\nMistakable(trace)\nEmpurple(trace, jabez)\nBollix(trace, jabez)\nSwivel(trace, jabez)\nZimbabwean(jabez)\nSweeping(jabez)\nPhobic(jabez)\nMistakable(jabez)\nEmpurple(jabez, trace)\nBollix(jabez, trace)\nSwivel(jabez, trace)\nforall x (Empurple(x, trace) -> Empurple(x, jabez))\nforall x (Stark(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Swivel(x, jabez) and Empurple(x, trace) -> Mistakable(trace))\nforall x (Sweeping(x) -> Bollix(x, jabez))\nforall x (Bollix(x, trace) and Empurple(x, trace) -> Empurple(x, jabez))\nforall x (Empurple(x, jabez) -> Swivel(x, trace))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) -> Empurple(x, trace))\nforall x (Empurple(x, jabez) and Empurple(x, trace) -> Stark(x))\n\nBollix(trace, trace)\n\nBollix(trace, trace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-352"} {"premises": "Saw is sisterlike. If Saw is sisterlike then Saw is unhealthy. All sisterlike things are adhesive. Big, getable things are surplus. Big, sisterlike things are surplus. If something is getable then it is surplus. If something is unhealthy and sisterlike then it is ecologic. Saw is sisterlike.", "logic": "\nSisterlike(saw)\nSisterlike(saw) -> Unhealthy(saw)\nforall x (Sisterlike(x) -> Adhesive(x))\nforall x (Adhesive(x) and Getable(x) -> Surplus(x))\nforall x (Adhesive(x) and Sisterlike(x) -> Surplus(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Surplus(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) and Sisterlike(x) -> Ecologic(x))\n\nSisterlike(saw)\n\ntherefore Sisterlike(saw)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Korney is gibbous. If Korney is gibbous then Korney is varying. All gibbous things are cambrian. Big, iranian things are scalic. Big, gibbous things are scalic. If something is iranian then it is scalic. If something is varying and gibbous then it is antenatal. Korney is not gibbous.", "logic": "\nGibbous(korney)\nGibbous(korney) -> Varying(korney)\nforall x (Gibbous(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) and Iranian(x) -> Scalic(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) and Gibbous(x) -> Scalic(x))\nforall x (Iranian(x) -> Scalic(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) and Gibbous(x) -> Antenatal(x))\n\nnot Gibbous(korney)\n\ntherefore Gibbous(korney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Gael is adulatory. If Gael is adulatory then Gael is tref. All adulatory things are attained. Big, thirty things are unsettled. Big, adulatory things are unsettled. If something is thirty then it is unsettled. If something is tref and adulatory then it is accursed. Gael is attained.", "logic": "\nAdulatory(gael)\nAdulatory(gael) -> Tref(gael)\nforall x (Adulatory(x) -> Attained(x))\nforall x (Attained(x) and Thirty(x) -> Unsettled(x))\nforall x (Attained(x) and Adulatory(x) -> Unsettled(x))\nforall x (Thirty(x) -> Unsettled(x))\nforall x (Tref(x) and Adulatory(x) -> Accursed(x))\n\nAttained(gael)\n\nAdulatory(gael) and forall x (Adulatory(x) -> Attained(x)) -> therefore Attained(gael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Chester is ignescent. If Chester is ignescent then Chester is diffident. All ignescent things are antigenic. Big, bronchial things are stemmed. Big, ignescent things are stemmed. If something is bronchial then it is stemmed. If something is diffident and ignescent then it is puffy. Chester is not diffident.", "logic": "\nIgnescent(chester)\nIgnescent(chester) -> Diffident(chester)\nforall x (Ignescent(x) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Antigenic(x) and Bronchial(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Antigenic(x) and Ignescent(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Diffident(x) and Ignescent(x) -> Puffy(x))\n\nnot Diffident(chester)\n\nIgnescent(chester) and Ignescent(chester) -> Diffident(chester) -> therefore Diffident(chester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Arthur is rockbound. If Arthur is rockbound then Arthur is pilous. All rockbound things are multiform. Big, fabled things are kenyan. Big, rockbound things are kenyan. If something is fabled then it is kenyan. If something is pilous and rockbound then it is restricted. Arthur is restricted.", "logic": "\nRockbound(arthur)\nRockbound(arthur) -> Pilous(arthur)\nforall x (Rockbound(x) -> Multiform(x))\nforall x (Multiform(x) and Fabled(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nforall x (Multiform(x) and Rockbound(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nforall x (Pilous(x) and Rockbound(x) -> Restricted(x))\n\nRestricted(arthur)\n\nRockbound(arthur) and Rockbound(arthur) -> Pilous(arthur) -> therefore Pilous(arthur) Pilous(arthur) and Rockbound(arthur) and forall x (Pilous(x) and Rockbound(x) -> Restricted(x)) -> therefore Restricted(arthur)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Alvera is unburdened. If Alvera is unburdened then Alvera is placatory. All unburdened things are alert. Big, baseless things are incognito. Big, unburdened things are incognito. If something is baseless then it is incognito. If something is placatory and unburdened then it is beloved. Alvera is not incognito.", "logic": "\nUnburdened(alvera)\nUnburdened(alvera) -> Placatory(alvera)\nforall x (Unburdened(x) -> Alert(x))\nforall x (Alert(x) and Baseless(x) -> Incognito(x))\nforall x (Alert(x) and Unburdened(x) -> Incognito(x))\nforall x (Baseless(x) -> Incognito(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) and Unburdened(x) -> Beloved(x))\n\nnot Incognito(alvera)\n\nUnburdened(alvera) and forall x (Unburdened(x) -> Alert(x)) -> therefore Alert(alvera) Alert(alvera) and Unburdened(alvera) and forall x (Alert(x) and Unburdened(x) -> Incognito(x)) -> therefore Incognito(alvera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Nicola is nonbearing. If Nicola is nonbearing then Nicola is toothless. All nonbearing things are rush. Big, tepid things are secular. Big, nonbearing things are secular. If something is tepid then it is secular. If something is toothless and nonbearing then it is reedlike. Nicola is not quiet.", "logic": "\nNonbearing(nicola)\nNonbearing(nicola) -> Toothless(nicola)\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) -> Rush(x))\nforall x (Rush(x) and Tepid(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Rush(x) and Nonbearing(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Tepid(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) and Nonbearing(x) -> Reedlike(x))\n\nnot Quiet(nicola)\n\nnot Quiet(nicola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Sturgis is unreported. If Sturgis is unreported then Sturgis is stormproof. All unreported things are purging. Big, judgmental things are tippy. Big, unreported things are tippy. If something is judgmental then it is tippy. If something is stormproof and unreported then it is mancunian. Sturgis is judgmental.", "logic": "\nUnreported(sturgis)\nUnreported(sturgis) -> Stormproof(sturgis)\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) and Judgmental(x) -> Tippy(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) and Unreported(x) -> Tippy(x))\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Tippy(x))\nforall x (Stormproof(x) and Unreported(x) -> Mancunian(x))\n\nJudgmental(sturgis)\n\nJudgmental(sturgis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2056"} {"premises": "Cherry is immense. Cherry is dumb. Cherry is untaxed. Cherry is inherited. Alys is dumb. Alys is unformed. Alys is untaxed. All immense, unformed things are busted. If Alys is dumb and Alys is unformed then Alys is immense. Cherry is untaxed.", "logic": "\nImmense(cherry)\nDumb(cherry)\nUntaxed(cherry)\nInherited(cherry)\nDumb(alys)\nUnformed(alys)\nUntaxed(alys)\nforall x (Immense(x) and Unformed(x) -> Busted(x))\nDumb(alys) and Unformed(alys) -> Immense(alys)\n\nUntaxed(cherry)\n\ntherefore Untaxed(cherry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Emmett is chylaceous. Emmett is officious. Emmett is agonized. Emmett is winking. Roshelle is officious. Roshelle is less. Roshelle is agonized. All chylaceous, less things are inboard. If Roshelle is officious and Roshelle is less then Roshelle is chylaceous. Emmett is not agonized.", "logic": "\nChylaceous(emmett)\nOfficious(emmett)\nAgonized(emmett)\nWinking(emmett)\nOfficious(roshelle)\nLess(roshelle)\nAgonized(roshelle)\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) and Less(x) -> Inboard(x))\nOfficious(roshelle) and Less(roshelle) -> Chylaceous(roshelle)\n\nnot Agonized(emmett)\n\ntherefore Agonized(emmett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Bogdan is comely. Bogdan is negro. Bogdan is whispered. Bogdan is steaming. Kenyon is negro. Kenyon is binomial. Kenyon is whispered. All comely, binomial things are routine. If Kenyon is negro and Kenyon is binomial then Kenyon is comely. Kenyon is comely.", "logic": "\nComely(bogdan)\nNegro(bogdan)\nWhispered(bogdan)\nSteaming(bogdan)\nNegro(kenyon)\nBinomial(kenyon)\nWhispered(kenyon)\nforall x (Comely(x) and Binomial(x) -> Routine(x))\nNegro(kenyon) and Binomial(kenyon) -> Comely(kenyon)\n\nComely(kenyon)\n\nNegro(kenyon) and Binomial(kenyon) and Negro(kenyon) and Binomial(kenyon) -> Comely(kenyon) -> therefore Comely(kenyon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Aggie is holy. Aggie is acuminate. Aggie is melted. Aggie is sloppy. Carlynn is acuminate. Carlynn is exuberant. Carlynn is melted. All holy, exuberant things are jingly. If Carlynn is acuminate and Carlynn is exuberant then Carlynn is holy. Carlynn is not holy.", "logic": "\nHoly(aggie)\nAcuminate(aggie)\nMelted(aggie)\nSloppy(aggie)\nAcuminate(carlynn)\nExuberant(carlynn)\nMelted(carlynn)\nforall x (Holy(x) and Exuberant(x) -> Jingly(x))\nAcuminate(carlynn) and Exuberant(carlynn) -> Holy(carlynn)\n\nnot Holy(carlynn)\n\nAcuminate(carlynn) and Exuberant(carlynn) and Acuminate(carlynn) and Exuberant(carlynn) -> Holy(carlynn) -> therefore Holy(carlynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Gavriel is felicitous. Gavriel is lxxxiii. Gavriel is guarded. Gavriel is variform. Apostolos is lxxxiii. Apostolos is anguine. Apostolos is guarded. All felicitous, anguine things are pushy. If Apostolos is lxxxiii and Apostolos is anguine then Apostolos is felicitous. Apostolos is pushy.", "logic": "\nFelicitous(gavriel)\nLxxxiii(gavriel)\nGuarded(gavriel)\nVariform(gavriel)\nLxxxiii(apostolos)\nAnguine(apostolos)\nGuarded(apostolos)\nforall x (Felicitous(x) and Anguine(x) -> Pushy(x))\nLxxxiii(apostolos) and Anguine(apostolos) -> Felicitous(apostolos)\n\nPushy(apostolos)\n\nLxxxiii(apostolos) and Anguine(apostolos) and Lxxxiii(apostolos) and Anguine(apostolos) -> Felicitous(apostolos) -> therefore Felicitous(apostolos) Felicitous(apostolos) and Anguine(apostolos) and forall x (Felicitous(x) and Anguine(x) -> Pushy(x)) -> therefore Pushy(apostolos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Kassia is ordained. Kassia is undersize. Kassia is brisk. Kassia is cloistered. Tobit is undersize. Tobit is snappy. Tobit is brisk. All ordained, snappy things are navicular. If Tobit is undersize and Tobit is snappy then Tobit is ordained. Tobit is not navicular.", "logic": "\nOrdained(kassia)\nUndersize(kassia)\nBrisk(kassia)\nCloistered(kassia)\nUndersize(tobit)\nSnappy(tobit)\nBrisk(tobit)\nforall x (Ordained(x) and Snappy(x) -> Navicular(x))\nUndersize(tobit) and Snappy(tobit) -> Ordained(tobit)\n\nnot Navicular(tobit)\n\nUndersize(tobit) and Snappy(tobit) and Undersize(tobit) and Snappy(tobit) -> Ordained(tobit) -> therefore Ordained(tobit) Ordained(tobit) and Snappy(tobit) and forall x (Ordained(x) and Snappy(x) -> Navicular(x)) -> therefore Navicular(tobit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Kaitlin is elementary. Kaitlin is monoatomic. Kaitlin is trussed. Kaitlin is fourfold. Hussein is monoatomic. Hussein is berried. Hussein is trussed. All elementary, berried things are patrician. If Hussein is monoatomic and Hussein is berried then Hussein is elementary. Kaitlin is not patrician.", "logic": "\nElementary(kaitlin)\nMonoatomic(kaitlin)\nTrussed(kaitlin)\nFourfold(kaitlin)\nMonoatomic(hussein)\nBerried(hussein)\nTrussed(hussein)\nforall x (Elementary(x) and Berried(x) -> Patrician(x))\nMonoatomic(hussein) and Berried(hussein) -> Elementary(hussein)\n\nnot Patrician(kaitlin)\n\nforall x (Elementary(x) and Berried(x) -> Patrician(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Pollyanna is airsick. Pollyanna is pecuniary. Pollyanna is viewless. Pollyanna is gormless. Lancelot is pecuniary. Lancelot is deictic. Lancelot is viewless. All airsick, deictic things are afflictive. If Lancelot is pecuniary and Lancelot is deictic then Lancelot is airsick. Pollyanna is blue.", "logic": "\nAirsick(pollyanna)\nPecuniary(pollyanna)\nViewless(pollyanna)\nGormless(pollyanna)\nPecuniary(lancelot)\nDeictic(lancelot)\nViewless(lancelot)\nforall x (Airsick(x) and Deictic(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nPecuniary(lancelot) and Deictic(lancelot) -> Airsick(lancelot)\n\nBlue(pollyanna)\n\nBlue(pollyanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Brandy is slapdash. Brandy is arcadian. Brandy is canonist. Brandy is grasping. Thea is arcadian. Thea is temptable. Thea is canonist. All slapdash, temptable things are swinish. If Thea is arcadian and Thea is temptable then Thea is slapdash. Brandy is not temptable.", "logic": "\nSlapdash(brandy)\nArcadian(brandy)\nCanonist(brandy)\nGrasping(brandy)\nArcadian(thea)\nTemptable(thea)\nCanonist(thea)\nforall x (Slapdash(x) and Temptable(x) -> Swinish(x))\nArcadian(thea) and Temptable(thea) -> Slapdash(thea)\n\nnot Temptable(brandy)\n\nnot Temptable(brandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Arnoldo is supervised. Arnoldo is cramped. Arnoldo is complacent. Arnoldo is sixpenny. Zorine is cramped. Zorine is stilly. Zorine is complacent. All supervised, stilly things are coiling. If Zorine is cramped and Zorine is stilly then Zorine is supervised. Zorine is blue.", "logic": "\nSupervised(arnoldo)\nCramped(arnoldo)\nComplacent(arnoldo)\nSixpenny(arnoldo)\nCramped(zorine)\nStilly(zorine)\nComplacent(zorine)\nforall x (Supervised(x) and Stilly(x) -> Coiling(x))\nCramped(zorine) and Stilly(zorine) -> Supervised(zorine)\n\nBlue(zorine)\n\nBlue(zorine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Glorianna is blastular. Ashby is not xliii. Ginnie is not haemolytic. Ginny is knitted. Quiet, blastular things are xliii. If something is knitted and not dissonant then it is frustrated. Green things are knitted. Glorianna is blastular.", "logic": "\nBlastular(glorianna)\nnot Xliii(ashby)\nnot Haemolytic(ginnie)\nKnitted(ginny)\nforall x (Knitted(x) and Blastular(x) -> Xliii(x))\nforall x (Knitted(x) and not Dissonant(x) -> Frustrated(x))\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Knitted(x))\n\nBlastular(glorianna)\n\ntherefore Blastular(glorianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Violetta is blamed. Valeda is not monarchal. Zalman is not chesty. Otho is burrlike. Quiet, blamed things are monarchal. If something is burrlike and not atilt then it is flatbottom. Green things are burrlike. Valeda is monarchal.", "logic": "\nBlamed(violetta)\nnot Monarchal(valeda)\nnot Chesty(zalman)\nBurrlike(otho)\nforall x (Burrlike(x) and Blamed(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) and not Atilt(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Burrlike(x))\n\nMonarchal(valeda)\n\ntherefore not Monarchal(valeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Glenn is leaky. Olly is not agape. Enriqueta is not doctorial. Allissa is bestubbled. Quiet, leaky things are agape. If something is bestubbled and not cyprinoid then it is nautical. Green things are bestubbled. Glenn is bestubbled.", "logic": "\nLeaky(glenn)\nnot Agape(olly)\nnot Doctorial(enriqueta)\nBestubbled(allissa)\nforall x (Bestubbled(x) and Leaky(x) -> Agape(x))\nforall x (Bestubbled(x) and not Cyprinoid(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Leaky(x) -> Bestubbled(x))\n\nBestubbled(glenn)\n\nLeaky(glenn) and forall x (Leaky(x) -> Bestubbled(x)) -> therefore Bestubbled(glenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Leo is epizoic. Moishe is not sluttish. Tania is not scrofulous. Claudie is meddling. Quiet, epizoic things are sluttish. If something is meddling and not spacey then it is popliteal. Green things are meddling. Leo is not meddling.", "logic": "\nEpizoic(leo)\nnot Sluttish(moishe)\nnot Scrofulous(tania)\nMeddling(claudie)\nforall x (Meddling(x) and Epizoic(x) -> Sluttish(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and not Spacey(x) -> Popliteal(x))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Meddling(x))\n\nnot Meddling(leo)\n\nEpizoic(leo) and forall x (Epizoic(x) -> Meddling(x)) -> therefore Meddling(leo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Eolande is strange. Teressa is not droll. Torin is not assured. Sauncho is coloured. Quiet, strange things are droll. If something is coloured and not overt then it is aramaic. Green things are coloured. Eolande is droll.", "logic": "\nStrange(eolande)\nnot Droll(teressa)\nnot Assured(torin)\nColoured(sauncho)\nforall x (Coloured(x) and Strange(x) -> Droll(x))\nforall x (Coloured(x) and not Overt(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) -> Coloured(x))\n\nDroll(eolande)\n\nStrange(eolande) and forall x (Strange(x) -> Coloured(x)) -> therefore Coloured(eolande) Coloured(eolande) and Strange(eolande) and forall x (Coloured(x) and Strange(x) -> Droll(x)) -> therefore Droll(eolande)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Sara is stormproof. Trent is not handsome. Fawna is not labeled. Wallis is parvenu. Quiet, stormproof things are handsome. If something is parvenu and not paying then it is pretend. Green things are parvenu. Sara is not handsome.", "logic": "\nStormproof(sara)\nnot Handsome(trent)\nnot Labeled(fawna)\nParvenu(wallis)\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and Stormproof(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and not Paying(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Stormproof(x) -> Parvenu(x))\n\nnot Handsome(sara)\n\nStormproof(sara) and forall x (Stormproof(x) -> Parvenu(x)) -> therefore Parvenu(sara) Parvenu(sara) and Stormproof(sara) and forall x (Parvenu(x) and Stormproof(x) -> Handsome(x)) -> therefore Handsome(sara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Randall is vowellike. Robinson is not suffusive. Cam is not crustacean. Teriann is anginous. Quiet, vowellike things are suffusive. If something is anginous and not breathed then it is static. Green things are anginous. Cam is not suffusive.", "logic": "\nVowellike(randall)\nnot Suffusive(robinson)\nnot Crustacean(cam)\nAnginous(teriann)\nforall x (Anginous(x) and Vowellike(x) -> Suffusive(x))\nforall x (Anginous(x) and not Breathed(x) -> Static(x))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Anginous(x))\n\nnot Suffusive(cam)\n\nforall x (Anginous(x) and Vowellike(x) -> Suffusive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Ally is custodial. Eberhard is not premier. Corrina is not loved. Lola is unthought. Quiet, custodial things are premier. If something is unthought and not content then it is convex. Green things are unthought. Corrina is unthought.", "logic": "\nCustodial(ally)\nnot Premier(eberhard)\nnot Loved(corrina)\nUnthought(lola)\nforall x (Unthought(x) and Custodial(x) -> Premier(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) and not Content(x) -> Convex(x))\nforall x (Custodial(x) -> Unthought(x))\n\nUnthought(corrina)\n\nforall x (Custodial(x) -> Unthought(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Josephina is crisp. Jeri is not quantal. Oliy is not duplex. Grier is benzoic. Quiet, crisp things are quantal. If something is benzoic and not mechanized then it is tolerant. Green things are benzoic. Josephina is not tolerant.", "logic": "\nCrisp(josephina)\nnot Quantal(jeri)\nnot Duplex(oliy)\nBenzoic(grier)\nforall x (Benzoic(x) and Crisp(x) -> Quantal(x))\nforall x (Benzoic(x) and not Mechanized(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) -> Benzoic(x))\n\nnot Tolerant(josephina)\n\nforall x (Benzoic(x) and not Mechanized(x) -> Tolerant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Valeria is heady. Milissent is not rimy. Tabbatha is not countable. Gigi is spattered. Quiet, heady things are rimy. If something is spattered and not indefinite then it is landscaped. Green things are spattered. Tabbatha is heady.", "logic": "\nHeady(valeria)\nnot Rimy(milissent)\nnot Countable(tabbatha)\nSpattered(gigi)\nforall x (Spattered(x) and Heady(x) -> Rimy(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) and not Indefinite(x) -> Landscaped(x))\nforall x (Heady(x) -> Spattered(x))\n\nHeady(tabbatha)\n\nHeady(tabbatha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Josy is buirdly. Milissent is not squashed. Amandy is not zippy. Selene is sunrise. Quiet, buirdly things are squashed. If something is sunrise and not serrate then it is activistic. Green things are sunrise. Milissent is not smart.", "logic": "\nBuirdly(josy)\nnot Squashed(milissent)\nnot Zippy(amandy)\nSunrise(selene)\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Buirdly(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and not Serrate(x) -> Activistic(x))\nforall x (Buirdly(x) -> Sunrise(x))\n\nnot Smart(milissent)\n\nnot Smart(milissent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Arther is zolaesque. Brewster is not sublime. Tarrant is not signed. Lamar is mohammedan. Quiet, zolaesque things are sublime. If something is mohammedan and not southern then it is smokeless. Green things are mohammedan. Tarrant is smart.", "logic": "\nZolaesque(arther)\nnot Sublime(brewster)\nnot Signed(tarrant)\nMohammedan(lamar)\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) and Zolaesque(x) -> Sublime(x))\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) and not Southern(x) -> Smokeless(x))\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) -> Mohammedan(x))\n\nSmart(tarrant)\n\nSmart(tarrant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-912"} {"premises": "Horacio is bregmatic. Horacio is whole. Patel is vulnerable. Patel is nutlike. Patel is bregmatic. Patel is plausive. Patel is whole. All bregmatic people are vulnerable. All bregmatic, vulnerable people are nutlike. If Horacio is plausive then Horacio is unpaved. Horacio is whole.", "logic": "\nBregmatic(horacio)\nWhole(horacio)\nVulnerable(patel)\nNutlike(patel)\nBregmatic(patel)\nPlausive(patel)\nWhole(patel)\nforall x (Bregmatic(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\nforall x (Bregmatic(x) and Vulnerable(x) -> Nutlike(x))\nPlausive(horacio) -> Unpaved(horacio)\n\nWhole(horacio)\n\ntherefore Whole(horacio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Paula is nonlethal. Paula is hefty. Blanch is possessive. Blanch is discerning. Blanch is nonlethal. Blanch is biyearly. Blanch is hefty. All nonlethal people are possessive. All nonlethal, possessive people are discerning. If Paula is biyearly then Paula is hindoo. Blanch is not biyearly.", "logic": "\nNonlethal(paula)\nHefty(paula)\nPossessive(blanch)\nDiscerning(blanch)\nNonlethal(blanch)\nBiyearly(blanch)\nHefty(blanch)\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Possessive(x))\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) and Possessive(x) -> Discerning(x))\nBiyearly(paula) -> Hindoo(paula)\n\nnot Biyearly(blanch)\n\ntherefore Biyearly(blanch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Johnny is outre. Johnny is evergreen. Tiphanie is lxviii. Tiphanie is haired. Tiphanie is outre. Tiphanie is scaly. Tiphanie is evergreen. All outre people are lxviii. All outre, lxviii people are haired. If Johnny is scaly then Johnny is craggy. Johnny is lxviii.", "logic": "\nOutre(johnny)\nEvergreen(johnny)\nLxviii(tiphanie)\nHaired(tiphanie)\nOutre(tiphanie)\nScaly(tiphanie)\nEvergreen(tiphanie)\nforall x (Outre(x) -> Lxviii(x))\nforall x (Outre(x) and Lxviii(x) -> Haired(x))\nScaly(johnny) -> Craggy(johnny)\n\nLxviii(johnny)\n\nOutre(johnny) and forall x (Outre(x) -> Lxviii(x)) -> therefore Lxviii(johnny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Joanna is sporty. Joanna is cordiform. Kathi is dextrorse. Kathi is voltaic. Kathi is sporty. Kathi is acrid. Kathi is cordiform. All sporty people are dextrorse. All sporty, dextrorse people are voltaic. If Joanna is acrid then Joanna is overlying. Joanna is not dextrorse.", "logic": "\nSporty(joanna)\nCordiform(joanna)\nDextrorse(kathi)\nVoltaic(kathi)\nSporty(kathi)\nAcrid(kathi)\nCordiform(kathi)\nforall x (Sporty(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) and Dextrorse(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nAcrid(joanna) -> Overlying(joanna)\n\nnot Dextrorse(joanna)\n\nSporty(joanna) and forall x (Sporty(x) -> Dextrorse(x)) -> therefore Dextrorse(joanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Shina is pressed. Shina is extropic. Woody is inflatable. Woody is dietary. Woody is pressed. Woody is utter. Woody is extropic. All pressed people are inflatable. All pressed, inflatable people are dietary. If Shina is utter then Shina is decorous. Shina is dietary.", "logic": "\nPressed(shina)\nExtropic(shina)\nInflatable(woody)\nDietary(woody)\nPressed(woody)\nUtter(woody)\nExtropic(woody)\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Inflatable(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Inflatable(x) -> Dietary(x))\nUtter(shina) -> Decorous(shina)\n\nDietary(shina)\n\nPressed(shina) and forall x (Pressed(x) -> Inflatable(x)) -> therefore Inflatable(shina) Pressed(shina) and Inflatable(shina) and forall x (Pressed(x) and Inflatable(x) -> Dietary(x)) -> therefore Dietary(shina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Serge is metaphoric. Serge is leathered. Bertina is welcoming. Bertina is albinal. Bertina is metaphoric. Bertina is seaworthy. Bertina is leathered. All metaphoric people are welcoming. All metaphoric, welcoming people are albinal. If Serge is seaworthy then Serge is weakening. Serge is not albinal.", "logic": "\nMetaphoric(serge)\nLeathered(serge)\nWelcoming(bertina)\nAlbinal(bertina)\nMetaphoric(bertina)\nSeaworthy(bertina)\nLeathered(bertina)\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Albinal(x))\nSeaworthy(serge) -> Weakening(serge)\n\nnot Albinal(serge)\n\nMetaphoric(serge) and forall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Welcoming(x)) -> therefore Welcoming(serge) Metaphoric(serge) and Welcoming(serge) and forall x (Metaphoric(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Albinal(x)) -> therefore Albinal(serge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Kerrin is bohemian. Kerrin is upfield. Nert is oppressed. Nert is bombastic. Nert is bohemian. Nert is helpless. Nert is upfield. All bohemian people are oppressed. All bohemian, oppressed people are bombastic. If Kerrin is helpless then Kerrin is dispersive. Kerrin is not dispersive.", "logic": "\nBohemian(kerrin)\nUpfield(kerrin)\nOppressed(nert)\nBombastic(nert)\nBohemian(nert)\nHelpless(nert)\nUpfield(nert)\nforall x (Bohemian(x) -> Oppressed(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Oppressed(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nHelpless(kerrin) -> Dispersive(kerrin)\n\nnot Dispersive(kerrin)\n\nHelpless(kerrin) -> Dispersive(kerrin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Marjy is ternary. Marjy is crinkled. Minerva is earthlike. Minerva is sore. Minerva is ternary. Minerva is amphoteric. Minerva is crinkled. All ternary people are earthlike. All ternary, earthlike people are sore. If Marjy is amphoteric then Marjy is desirable. Marjy is amphoteric.", "logic": "\nTernary(marjy)\nCrinkled(marjy)\nEarthlike(minerva)\nSore(minerva)\nTernary(minerva)\nAmphoteric(minerva)\nCrinkled(minerva)\nforall x (Ternary(x) -> Earthlike(x))\nforall x (Ternary(x) and Earthlike(x) -> Sore(x))\nAmphoteric(marjy) -> Desirable(marjy)\n\nAmphoteric(marjy)\n\nAmphoteric(marjy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Sheila is sickening. Sheila is aspiring. Bertie is frenetic. Bertie is upfront. Bertie is sickening. Bertie is unnamed. Bertie is aspiring. All sickening people are frenetic. All sickening, frenetic people are upfront. If Sheila is unnamed then Sheila is undetected. Bertie is not green.", "logic": "\nSickening(sheila)\nAspiring(sheila)\nFrenetic(bertie)\nUpfront(bertie)\nSickening(bertie)\nUnnamed(bertie)\nAspiring(bertie)\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Frenetic(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Upfront(x))\nUnnamed(sheila) -> Undetected(sheila)\n\nnot Green(bertie)\n\nnot Green(bertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "Terra is respondent. Terra is drizzling. Husain is disputable. Husain is unmanned. Husain is respondent. Husain is harmless. Husain is drizzling. All respondent people are disputable. All respondent, disputable people are unmanned. If Terra is harmless then Terra is guardant. Husain is guardant.", "logic": "\nRespondent(terra)\nDrizzling(terra)\nDisputable(husain)\nUnmanned(husain)\nRespondent(husain)\nHarmless(husain)\nDrizzling(husain)\nforall x (Respondent(x) -> Disputable(x))\nforall x (Respondent(x) and Disputable(x) -> Unmanned(x))\nHarmless(terra) -> Guardant(terra)\n\nGuardant(husain)\n\nGuardant(husain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1556"} {"premises": "The othilie jeopardize the nelly. The othilie promenade the nelly. The othilie is penetrable. The othilie is feasible. The othilie is armed. The othilie is unspent. The nelly jeopardize the othilie. The nelly promenade the othilie. The nelly is crowned. The nelly is armed. The nelly is unspent. The nelly cane the othilie. If something is unspent and it jeopardize the nelly then it cane the othilie. If something promenade the othilie and it jeopardize the othilie then the othilie is feasible. If something cane the nelly and the nelly cane the othilie then the othilie promenade the nelly. If something jeopardize the othilie and it cane the othilie then the othilie cane the nelly. If something is penetrable and feasible then it jeopardize the othilie. If something cane the nelly and the nelly is unspent then it is crowned. The nelly is unspent.", "logic": "\nJeopardize(othilie, nelly)\nPromenade(othilie, nelly)\nPenetrable(othilie)\nFeasible(othilie)\nArmed(othilie)\nUnspent(othilie)\nJeopardize(nelly, othilie)\nPromenade(nelly, othilie)\nCrowned(nelly)\nArmed(nelly)\nUnspent(nelly)\nCane(nelly, othilie)\nforall x (Unspent(x) and Jeopardize(x, nelly) -> Cane(x, othilie))\nforall x (Promenade(x, othilie) and Jeopardize(x, othilie) -> Feasible(othilie))\nforall x (Cane(x, nelly) and Cane(nelly, othilie) -> Promenade(othilie, nelly))\nforall x (Jeopardize(x, othilie) and Cane(x, othilie) -> Cane(othilie, nelly))\nforall x (Penetrable(x) and Feasible(x) -> Jeopardize(x, othilie))\nforall x (Cane(x, nelly) and Unspent(nelly) -> Crowned(x))\n\nUnspent(nelly)\n\ntherefore Unspent(nelly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The eldon sharpen the fremont. The eldon infuscate the fremont. The eldon is presto. The eldon is plantar. The eldon is cosmogonic. The eldon is perverse. The fremont sharpen the eldon. The fremont infuscate the eldon. The fremont is orbicular. The fremont is cosmogonic. The fremont is perverse. The fremont outpace the eldon. If something is perverse and it sharpen the fremont then it outpace the eldon. If something infuscate the eldon and it sharpen the eldon then the eldon is plantar. If something outpace the fremont and the fremont outpace the eldon then the eldon infuscate the fremont. If something sharpen the eldon and it outpace the eldon then the eldon outpace the fremont. If something is presto and plantar then it sharpen the eldon. If something outpace the fremont and the fremont is perverse then it is orbicular. The fremont does not chase the eldon.", "logic": "\nSharpen(eldon, fremont)\nInfuscate(eldon, fremont)\nPresto(eldon)\nPlantar(eldon)\nCosmogonic(eldon)\nPerverse(eldon)\nSharpen(fremont, eldon)\nInfuscate(fremont, eldon)\nOrbicular(fremont)\nCosmogonic(fremont)\nPerverse(fremont)\nOutpace(fremont, eldon)\nforall x (Perverse(x) and Sharpen(x, fremont) -> Outpace(x, eldon))\nforall x (Infuscate(x, eldon) and Sharpen(x, eldon) -> Plantar(eldon))\nforall x (Outpace(x, fremont) and Outpace(fremont, eldon) -> Infuscate(eldon, fremont))\nforall x (Sharpen(x, eldon) and Outpace(x, eldon) -> Outpace(eldon, fremont))\nforall x (Presto(x) and Plantar(x) -> Sharpen(x, eldon))\nforall x (Outpace(x, fremont) and Perverse(fremont) -> Orbicular(x))\n\nnot Sharpen(fremont, eldon)\n\ntherefore Sharpen(fremont, eldon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The monique chirp the etty. The monique reprove the etty. The monique is pregnant. The monique is positive. The monique is handheld. The monique is none. The etty chirp the monique. The etty reprove the monique. The etty is premature. The etty is handheld. The etty is none. The etty riffle the monique. If something is none and it chirp the etty then it riffle the monique. If something reprove the monique and it chirp the monique then the monique is positive. If something riffle the etty and the etty riffle the monique then the monique reprove the etty. If something chirp the monique and it riffle the monique then the monique riffle the etty. If something is pregnant and positive then it chirp the monique. If something riffle the etty and the etty is none then it is premature. The monique riffle the monique.", "logic": "\nChirp(monique, etty)\nReprove(monique, etty)\nPregnant(monique)\nPositive(monique)\nHandheld(monique)\nNone(monique)\nChirp(etty, monique)\nReprove(etty, monique)\nPremature(etty)\nHandheld(etty)\nNone(etty)\nRiffle(etty, monique)\nforall x (None(x) and Chirp(x, etty) -> Riffle(x, monique))\nforall x (Reprove(x, monique) and Chirp(x, monique) -> Positive(monique))\nforall x (Riffle(x, etty) and Riffle(etty, monique) -> Reprove(monique, etty))\nforall x (Chirp(x, monique) and Riffle(x, monique) -> Riffle(monique, etty))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) and Positive(x) -> Chirp(x, monique))\nforall x (Riffle(x, etty) and None(etty) -> Premature(x))\n\nRiffle(monique, monique)\n\nNone(monique) and Chirp(monique, etty) and forall x (None(x) and Chirp(x, etty) -> Riffle(x, monique)) -> therefore Riffle(monique, monique)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The vern queue the kristen. The vern devise the kristen. The vern is moonstruck. The vern is sanitised. The vern is monitory. The vern is blotto. The kristen queue the vern. The kristen devise the vern. The kristen is botonee. The kristen is monitory. The kristen is blotto. The kristen outline the vern. If something is blotto and it queue the kristen then it outline the vern. If something devise the vern and it queue the vern then the vern is sanitised. If something outline the kristen and the kristen outline the vern then the vern devise the kristen. If something queue the vern and it outline the vern then the vern outline the kristen. If something is moonstruck and sanitised then it queue the vern. If something outline the kristen and the kristen is blotto then it is botonee. The vern does not need the kristen.", "logic": "\nQueue(vern, kristen)\nDevise(vern, kristen)\nMoonstruck(vern)\nSanitised(vern)\nMonitory(vern)\nBlotto(vern)\nQueue(kristen, vern)\nDevise(kristen, vern)\nBotonee(kristen)\nMonitory(kristen)\nBlotto(kristen)\nOutline(kristen, vern)\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Queue(x, kristen) -> Outline(x, vern))\nforall x (Devise(x, vern) and Queue(x, vern) -> Sanitised(vern))\nforall x (Outline(x, kristen) and Outline(kristen, vern) -> Devise(vern, kristen))\nforall x (Queue(x, vern) and Outline(x, vern) -> Outline(vern, kristen))\nforall x (Moonstruck(x) and Sanitised(x) -> Queue(x, vern))\nforall x (Outline(x, kristen) and Blotto(kristen) -> Botonee(x))\n\nnot Outline(vern, kristen)\n\nQueue(kristen, vern) and Outline(kristen, vern) and forall x (Queue(x, vern) and Outline(x, vern) -> Outline(vern, kristen)) -> therefore Outline(vern, kristen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The clair transpire the krissy. The clair couch the krissy. The clair is exothermic. The clair is unedifying. The clair is coccal. The clair is coagulated. The krissy transpire the clair. The krissy couch the clair. The krissy is extensile. The krissy is coccal. The krissy is coagulated. The krissy chisel the clair. If something is coagulated and it transpire the krissy then it chisel the clair. If something couch the clair and it transpire the clair then the clair is unedifying. If something chisel the krissy and the krissy chisel the clair then the clair couch the krissy. If something transpire the clair and it chisel the clair then the clair chisel the krissy. If something is exothermic and unedifying then it transpire the clair. If something chisel the krissy and the krissy is coagulated then it is extensile. The clair is extensile.", "logic": "\nTranspire(clair, krissy)\nCouch(clair, krissy)\nExothermic(clair)\nUnedifying(clair)\nCoccal(clair)\nCoagulated(clair)\nTranspire(krissy, clair)\nCouch(krissy, clair)\nExtensile(krissy)\nCoccal(krissy)\nCoagulated(krissy)\nChisel(krissy, clair)\nforall x (Coagulated(x) and Transpire(x, krissy) -> Chisel(x, clair))\nforall x (Couch(x, clair) and Transpire(x, clair) -> Unedifying(clair))\nforall x (Chisel(x, krissy) and Chisel(krissy, clair) -> Couch(clair, krissy))\nforall x (Transpire(x, clair) and Chisel(x, clair) -> Chisel(clair, krissy))\nforall x (Exothermic(x) and Unedifying(x) -> Transpire(x, clair))\nforall x (Chisel(x, krissy) and Coagulated(krissy) -> Extensile(x))\n\nExtensile(clair)\n\nTranspire(krissy, clair) and Chisel(krissy, clair) and forall x (Transpire(x, clair) and Chisel(x, clair) -> Chisel(clair, krissy)) -> therefore Chisel(clair, krissy) Chisel(clair, krissy) and Coagulated(krissy) and forall x (Chisel(x, krissy) and Coagulated(krissy) -> Extensile(x)) -> therefore Extensile(clair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The frans sharpshoot the delphine. The frans record the delphine. The frans is lxxiii. The frans is prostate. The frans is sustained. The frans is blonde. The delphine sharpshoot the frans. The delphine record the frans. The delphine is giddy. The delphine is sustained. The delphine is blonde. The delphine coldcock the frans. If something is blonde and it sharpshoot the delphine then it coldcock the frans. If something record the frans and it sharpshoot the frans then the frans is prostate. If something coldcock the delphine and the delphine coldcock the frans then the frans record the delphine. If something sharpshoot the frans and it coldcock the frans then the frans coldcock the delphine. If something is lxxiii and prostate then it sharpshoot the frans. If something coldcock the delphine and the delphine is blonde then it is giddy. The frans is not giddy.", "logic": "\nSharpshoot(frans, delphine)\nRecord(frans, delphine)\nLxxiii(frans)\nProstate(frans)\nSustained(frans)\nBlonde(frans)\nSharpshoot(delphine, frans)\nRecord(delphine, frans)\nGiddy(delphine)\nSustained(delphine)\nBlonde(delphine)\nColdcock(delphine, frans)\nforall x (Blonde(x) and Sharpshoot(x, delphine) -> Coldcock(x, frans))\nforall x (Record(x, frans) and Sharpshoot(x, frans) -> Prostate(frans))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, delphine) and Coldcock(delphine, frans) -> Record(frans, delphine))\nforall x (Sharpshoot(x, frans) and Coldcock(x, frans) -> Coldcock(frans, delphine))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and Prostate(x) -> Sharpshoot(x, frans))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, delphine) and Blonde(delphine) -> Giddy(x))\n\nnot Giddy(frans)\n\nSharpshoot(delphine, frans) and Coldcock(delphine, frans) and forall x (Sharpshoot(x, frans) and Coldcock(x, frans) -> Coldcock(frans, delphine)) -> therefore Coldcock(frans, delphine) Coldcock(frans, delphine) and Blonde(delphine) and forall x (Coldcock(x, delphine) and Blonde(delphine) -> Giddy(x)) -> therefore Giddy(frans)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The moise storm the anja. The moise loot the anja. The moise is backswept. The moise is friable. The moise is wonted. The moise is strong. The anja storm the moise. The anja loot the moise. The anja is lxxii. The anja is wonted. The anja is strong. The anja lighter the moise. If something is strong and it storm the anja then it lighter the moise. If something loot the moise and it storm the moise then the moise is friable. If something lighter the anja and the anja lighter the moise then the moise loot the anja. If something storm the moise and it lighter the moise then the moise lighter the anja. If something is backswept and friable then it storm the moise. If something lighter the anja and the anja is strong then it is lxxii. The anja does not eat the anja.", "logic": "\nStorm(moise, anja)\nLoot(moise, anja)\nBackswept(moise)\nFriable(moise)\nWonted(moise)\nStrong(moise)\nStorm(anja, moise)\nLoot(anja, moise)\nLxxii(anja)\nWonted(anja)\nStrong(anja)\nLighter(anja, moise)\nforall x (Strong(x) and Storm(x, anja) -> Lighter(x, moise))\nforall x (Loot(x, moise) and Storm(x, moise) -> Friable(moise))\nforall x (Lighter(x, anja) and Lighter(anja, moise) -> Loot(moise, anja))\nforall x (Storm(x, moise) and Lighter(x, moise) -> Lighter(moise, anja))\nforall x (Backswept(x) and Friable(x) -> Storm(x, moise))\nforall x (Lighter(x, anja) and Strong(anja) -> Lxxii(x))\n\nnot Loot(anja, anja)\n\nnot Loot(anja, anja) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The frieda defraud the pearline. The frieda blather the pearline. The frieda is chirpy. The frieda is imbecilic. The frieda is voracious. The frieda is chiasmatic. The pearline defraud the frieda. The pearline blather the frieda. The pearline is rockbound. The pearline is voracious. The pearline is chiasmatic. The pearline tumesce the frieda. If something is chiasmatic and it defraud the pearline then it tumesce the frieda. If something blather the frieda and it defraud the frieda then the frieda is imbecilic. If something tumesce the pearline and the pearline tumesce the frieda then the frieda blather the pearline. If something defraud the frieda and it tumesce the frieda then the frieda tumesce the pearline. If something is chirpy and imbecilic then it defraud the frieda. If something tumesce the pearline and the pearline is chiasmatic then it is rockbound. The pearline defraud the pearline.", "logic": "\nDefraud(frieda, pearline)\nBlather(frieda, pearline)\nChirpy(frieda)\nImbecilic(frieda)\nVoracious(frieda)\nChiasmatic(frieda)\nDefraud(pearline, frieda)\nBlather(pearline, frieda)\nRockbound(pearline)\nVoracious(pearline)\nChiasmatic(pearline)\nTumesce(pearline, frieda)\nforall x (Chiasmatic(x) and Defraud(x, pearline) -> Tumesce(x, frieda))\nforall x (Blather(x, frieda) and Defraud(x, frieda) -> Imbecilic(frieda))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, pearline) and Tumesce(pearline, frieda) -> Blather(frieda, pearline))\nforall x (Defraud(x, frieda) and Tumesce(x, frieda) -> Tumesce(frieda, pearline))\nforall x (Chirpy(x) and Imbecilic(x) -> Defraud(x, frieda))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, pearline) and Chiasmatic(pearline) -> Rockbound(x))\n\nDefraud(pearline, pearline)\n\nDefraud(pearline, pearline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The lizbeth shrug the mersey. The lizbeth syllogise the mersey. The lizbeth is fraudulent. The lizbeth is sapid. The lizbeth is sclerotic. The lizbeth is frilly. The mersey shrug the lizbeth. The mersey syllogise the lizbeth. The mersey is gammy. The mersey is sclerotic. The mersey is frilly. The mersey frivol the lizbeth. If something is frilly and it shrug the mersey then it frivol the lizbeth. If something syllogise the lizbeth and it shrug the lizbeth then the lizbeth is sapid. If something frivol the mersey and the mersey frivol the lizbeth then the lizbeth syllogise the mersey. If something shrug the lizbeth and it frivol the lizbeth then the lizbeth frivol the mersey. If something is fraudulent and sapid then it shrug the lizbeth. If something frivol the mersey and the mersey is frilly then it is gammy. The lizbeth does not eat the lizbeth.", "logic": "\nShrug(lizbeth, mersey)\nSyllogise(lizbeth, mersey)\nFraudulent(lizbeth)\nSapid(lizbeth)\nSclerotic(lizbeth)\nFrilly(lizbeth)\nShrug(mersey, lizbeth)\nSyllogise(mersey, lizbeth)\nGammy(mersey)\nSclerotic(mersey)\nFrilly(mersey)\nFrivol(mersey, lizbeth)\nforall x (Frilly(x) and Shrug(x, mersey) -> Frivol(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, lizbeth) and Shrug(x, lizbeth) -> Sapid(lizbeth))\nforall x (Frivol(x, mersey) and Frivol(mersey, lizbeth) -> Syllogise(lizbeth, mersey))\nforall x (Shrug(x, lizbeth) and Frivol(x, lizbeth) -> Frivol(lizbeth, mersey))\nforall x (Fraudulent(x) and Sapid(x) -> Shrug(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Frivol(x, mersey) and Frilly(mersey) -> Gammy(x))\n\nnot Syllogise(lizbeth, lizbeth)\n\nnot Syllogise(lizbeth, lizbeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The sallyann broker the agace. The sallyann dissociate the agace. The sallyann is untired. The sallyann is impotent. The sallyann is excused. The sallyann is encircling. The agace broker the sallyann. The agace dissociate the sallyann. The agace is ultra. The agace is excused. The agace is encircling. The agace occupy the sallyann. If something is encircling and it broker the agace then it occupy the sallyann. If something dissociate the sallyann and it broker the sallyann then the sallyann is impotent. If something occupy the agace and the agace occupy the sallyann then the sallyann dissociate the agace. If something broker the sallyann and it occupy the sallyann then the sallyann occupy the agace. If something is untired and impotent then it broker the sallyann. If something occupy the agace and the agace is encircling then it is ultra. The agace occupy the agace.", "logic": "\nBroker(sallyann, agace)\nDissociate(sallyann, agace)\nUntired(sallyann)\nImpotent(sallyann)\nExcused(sallyann)\nEncircling(sallyann)\nBroker(agace, sallyann)\nDissociate(agace, sallyann)\nUltra(agace)\nExcused(agace)\nEncircling(agace)\nOccupy(agace, sallyann)\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Broker(x, agace) -> Occupy(x, sallyann))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, sallyann) and Broker(x, sallyann) -> Impotent(sallyann))\nforall x (Occupy(x, agace) and Occupy(agace, sallyann) -> Dissociate(sallyann, agace))\nforall x (Broker(x, sallyann) and Occupy(x, sallyann) -> Occupy(sallyann, agace))\nforall x (Untired(x) and Impotent(x) -> Broker(x, sallyann))\nforall x (Occupy(x, agace) and Encircling(agace) -> Ultra(x))\n\nOccupy(agace, agace)\n\nOccupy(agace, agace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The norah outrival the izak. The norah criticize the izak. The norah is ammino. The norah is bilateral. The norah is ironshod. The norah is bunchy. The izak outrival the norah. The izak criticize the norah. The izak is colorfast. The izak is ironshod. The izak is bunchy. The izak honor the norah. If something is bunchy and it outrival the izak then it honor the norah. If something criticize the norah and it outrival the norah then the norah is bilateral. If something honor the izak and the izak honor the norah then the norah criticize the izak. If something outrival the norah and it honor the norah then the norah honor the izak. If something is ammino and bilateral then it outrival the norah. If something honor the izak and the izak is bunchy then it is colorfast. The izak is not bilateral.", "logic": "\nOutrival(norah, izak)\nCriticize(norah, izak)\nAmmino(norah)\nBilateral(norah)\nIronshod(norah)\nBunchy(norah)\nOutrival(izak, norah)\nCriticize(izak, norah)\nColorfast(izak)\nIronshod(izak)\nBunchy(izak)\nHonor(izak, norah)\nforall x (Bunchy(x) and Outrival(x, izak) -> Honor(x, norah))\nforall x (Criticize(x, norah) and Outrival(x, norah) -> Bilateral(norah))\nforall x (Honor(x, izak) and Honor(izak, norah) -> Criticize(norah, izak))\nforall x (Outrival(x, norah) and Honor(x, norah) -> Honor(norah, izak))\nforall x (Ammino(x) and Bilateral(x) -> Outrival(x, norah))\nforall x (Honor(x, izak) and Bunchy(izak) -> Colorfast(x))\n\nnot Bilateral(izak)\n\nnot Bilateral(izak) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "The grace whomp the tobie. The grace ground the tobie. The grace is untaught. The grace is insurgent. The grace is unsalaried. The grace is roumanian. The tobie whomp the grace. The tobie ground the grace. The tobie is pyogenic. The tobie is unsalaried. The tobie is roumanian. The tobie overtax the grace. If something is roumanian and it whomp the tobie then it overtax the grace. If something ground the grace and it whomp the grace then the grace is insurgent. If something overtax the tobie and the tobie overtax the grace then the grace ground the tobie. If something whomp the grace and it overtax the grace then the grace overtax the tobie. If something is untaught and insurgent then it whomp the grace. If something overtax the tobie and the tobie is roumanian then it is pyogenic. The tobie is untaught.", "logic": "\nWhomp(grace, tobie)\nGround(grace, tobie)\nUntaught(grace)\nInsurgent(grace)\nUnsalaried(grace)\nRoumanian(grace)\nWhomp(tobie, grace)\nGround(tobie, grace)\nPyogenic(tobie)\nUnsalaried(tobie)\nRoumanian(tobie)\nOvertax(tobie, grace)\nforall x (Roumanian(x) and Whomp(x, tobie) -> Overtax(x, grace))\nforall x (Ground(x, grace) and Whomp(x, grace) -> Insurgent(grace))\nforall x (Overtax(x, tobie) and Overtax(tobie, grace) -> Ground(grace, tobie))\nforall x (Whomp(x, grace) and Overtax(x, grace) -> Overtax(grace, tobie))\nforall x (Untaught(x) and Insurgent(x) -> Whomp(x, grace))\nforall x (Overtax(x, tobie) and Roumanian(tobie) -> Pyogenic(x))\n\nUntaught(tobie)\n\nUntaught(tobie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-33"} {"premises": "Hesther is lacteal. Hesther is agamous. Hesther is not breeding. Sal is agamous. Sal is not breeding. Sal is spineless. Sal is maniac. Nikoletta is not pearly. Nikoletta is vestigial. Nikoletta is maniac. If someone is maniac and not breeding then they are pearly. All lacteal, maniac people are agamous. White, vestigial people are agamous. If someone is spineless and not breeding then they are agamous. Big, agamous people are spineless. If someone is agamous and maniac then they are spineless. Hesther is agamous.", "logic": "\nLacteal(hesther)\nAgamous(hesther)\nnot Breeding(hesther)\nAgamous(sal)\nnot Breeding(sal)\nSpineless(sal)\nManiac(sal)\nnot Pearly(nikoletta)\nVestigial(nikoletta)\nManiac(nikoletta)\nforall x (Maniac(x) and not Breeding(x) -> Pearly(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Maniac(x) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Maniac(x) and Vestigial(x) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) and not Breeding(x) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Agamous(x) -> Spineless(x))\nforall x (Agamous(x) and Maniac(x) -> Spineless(x))\n\nAgamous(hesther)\n\ntherefore Agamous(hesther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Lane is beamish. Lane is damn. Lane is not iridic. Allan is damn. Allan is not iridic. Allan is uncheerful. Allan is incognito. Collin is not sunstruck. Collin is unshelled. Collin is incognito. If someone is incognito and not iridic then they are sunstruck. All beamish, incognito people are damn. White, unshelled people are damn. If someone is uncheerful and not iridic then they are damn. Big, damn people are uncheerful. If someone is damn and incognito then they are uncheerful. Allan is not uncheerful.", "logic": "\nBeamish(lane)\nDamn(lane)\nnot Iridic(lane)\nDamn(allan)\nnot Iridic(allan)\nUncheerful(allan)\nIncognito(allan)\nnot Sunstruck(collin)\nUnshelled(collin)\nIncognito(collin)\nforall x (Incognito(x) and not Iridic(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\nforall x (Beamish(x) and Incognito(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Incognito(x) and Unshelled(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Uncheerful(x) and not Iridic(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Beamish(x) and Damn(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\nforall x (Damn(x) and Incognito(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\n\nnot Uncheerful(allan)\n\ntherefore Uncheerful(allan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Alexa is stimulated. Alexa is venal. Alexa is not informed. Mariana is venal. Mariana is not informed. Mariana is tearful. Mariana is single. Lizabeth is not feathered. Lizabeth is infertile. Lizabeth is single. If someone is single and not informed then they are feathered. All stimulated, single people are venal. White, infertile people are venal. If someone is tearful and not informed then they are venal. Big, venal people are tearful. If someone is venal and single then they are tearful. Lizabeth is venal.", "logic": "\nStimulated(alexa)\nVenal(alexa)\nnot Informed(alexa)\nVenal(mariana)\nnot Informed(mariana)\nTearful(mariana)\nSingle(mariana)\nnot Feathered(lizabeth)\nInfertile(lizabeth)\nSingle(lizabeth)\nforall x (Single(x) and not Informed(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) and Single(x) -> Venal(x))\nforall x (Single(x) and Infertile(x) -> Venal(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) and not Informed(x) -> Venal(x))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) and Venal(x) -> Tearful(x))\nforall x (Venal(x) and Single(x) -> Tearful(x))\n\nVenal(lizabeth)\n\nSingle(lizabeth) and Infertile(lizabeth) and forall x (Single(x) and Infertile(x) -> Venal(x)) -> therefore Venal(lizabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Garfield is shoeless. Garfield is tameable. Garfield is not sequent. Tobiah is tameable. Tobiah is not sequent. Tobiah is sonic. Tobiah is expiatory. Roxanne is not undoable. Roxanne is angolan. Roxanne is expiatory. If someone is expiatory and not sequent then they are undoable. All shoeless, expiatory people are tameable. White, angolan people are tameable. If someone is sonic and not sequent then they are tameable. Big, tameable people are sonic. If someone is tameable and expiatory then they are sonic. Garfield is not sonic.", "logic": "\nShoeless(garfield)\nTameable(garfield)\nnot Sequent(garfield)\nTameable(tobiah)\nnot Sequent(tobiah)\nSonic(tobiah)\nExpiatory(tobiah)\nnot Undoable(roxanne)\nAngolan(roxanne)\nExpiatory(roxanne)\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and not Sequent(x) -> Undoable(x))\nforall x (Shoeless(x) and Expiatory(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and Angolan(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Sonic(x) and not Sequent(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Shoeless(x) and Tameable(x) -> Sonic(x))\nforall x (Tameable(x) and Expiatory(x) -> Sonic(x))\n\nnot Sonic(garfield)\n\nShoeless(garfield) and Tameable(garfield) and forall x (Shoeless(x) and Tameable(x) -> Sonic(x)) -> therefore Sonic(garfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Garnette is lackluster. Garnette is furred. Garnette is not metallike. Jordanna is furred. Jordanna is not metallike. Jordanna is achromous. Jordanna is superlunar. Joselyn is not treble. Joselyn is feckless. Joselyn is superlunar. If someone is superlunar and not metallike then they are treble. All lackluster, superlunar people are furred. White, feckless people are furred. If someone is achromous and not metallike then they are furred. Big, furred people are achromous. If someone is furred and superlunar then they are achromous. Joselyn is achromous.", "logic": "\nLackluster(garnette)\nFurred(garnette)\nnot Metallike(garnette)\nFurred(jordanna)\nnot Metallike(jordanna)\nAchromous(jordanna)\nSuperlunar(jordanna)\nnot Treble(joselyn)\nFeckless(joselyn)\nSuperlunar(joselyn)\nforall x (Superlunar(x) and not Metallike(x) -> Treble(x))\nforall x (Lackluster(x) and Superlunar(x) -> Furred(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) and Feckless(x) -> Furred(x))\nforall x (Achromous(x) and not Metallike(x) -> Furred(x))\nforall x (Lackluster(x) and Furred(x) -> Achromous(x))\nforall x (Furred(x) and Superlunar(x) -> Achromous(x))\n\nAchromous(joselyn)\n\nSuperlunar(joselyn) and Feckless(joselyn) and forall x (Superlunar(x) and Feckless(x) -> Furred(x)) -> therefore Furred(joselyn) Furred(joselyn) and Superlunar(joselyn) and forall x (Furred(x) and Superlunar(x) -> Achromous(x)) -> therefore Achromous(joselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Hamlin is sapphic. Hamlin is numb. Hamlin is not climactic. Magdaia is numb. Magdaia is not climactic. Magdaia is revived. Magdaia is urethral. Jodi is not midland. Jodi is banner. Jodi is urethral. If someone is urethral and not climactic then they are midland. All sapphic, urethral people are numb. White, banner people are numb. If someone is revived and not climactic then they are numb. Big, numb people are revived. If someone is numb and urethral then they are revived. Jodi is not revived.", "logic": "\nSapphic(hamlin)\nNumb(hamlin)\nnot Climactic(hamlin)\nNumb(magdaia)\nnot Climactic(magdaia)\nRevived(magdaia)\nUrethral(magdaia)\nnot Midland(jodi)\nBanner(jodi)\nUrethral(jodi)\nforall x (Urethral(x) and not Climactic(x) -> Midland(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Urethral(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Urethral(x) and Banner(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Revived(x) and not Climactic(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Numb(x) -> Revived(x))\nforall x (Numb(x) and Urethral(x) -> Revived(x))\n\nnot Revived(jodi)\n\nUrethral(jodi) and Banner(jodi) and forall x (Urethral(x) and Banner(x) -> Numb(x)) -> therefore Numb(jodi) Numb(jodi) and Urethral(jodi) and forall x (Numb(x) and Urethral(x) -> Revived(x)) -> therefore Revived(jodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Gabriel is transitive. Gabriel is massive. Gabriel is not hydric. Grace is massive. Grace is not hydric. Grace is prosthetic. Grace is seamy. Danny is not distal. Danny is sixty. Danny is seamy. If someone is seamy and not hydric then they are distal. All transitive, seamy people are massive. White, sixty people are massive. If someone is prosthetic and not hydric then they are massive. Big, massive people are prosthetic. If someone is massive and seamy then they are prosthetic. Gabriel is not distal.", "logic": "\nTransitive(gabriel)\nMassive(gabriel)\nnot Hydric(gabriel)\nMassive(grace)\nnot Hydric(grace)\nProsthetic(grace)\nSeamy(grace)\nnot Distal(danny)\nSixty(danny)\nSeamy(danny)\nforall x (Seamy(x) and not Hydric(x) -> Distal(x))\nforall x (Transitive(x) and Seamy(x) -> Massive(x))\nforall x (Seamy(x) and Sixty(x) -> Massive(x))\nforall x (Prosthetic(x) and not Hydric(x) -> Massive(x))\nforall x (Transitive(x) and Massive(x) -> Prosthetic(x))\nforall x (Massive(x) and Seamy(x) -> Prosthetic(x))\n\nnot Distal(gabriel)\n\nforall x (Seamy(x) and not Hydric(x) -> Distal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Patric is malefic. Patric is immaterial. Patric is not awheel. Vivienne is immaterial. Vivienne is not awheel. Vivienne is chaldean. Vivienne is chassidic. Sandro is not peerless. Sandro is convex. Sandro is chassidic. If someone is chassidic and not awheel then they are peerless. All malefic, chassidic people are immaterial. White, convex people are immaterial. If someone is chaldean and not awheel then they are immaterial. Big, immaterial people are chaldean. If someone is immaterial and chassidic then they are chaldean. Patric is chassidic.", "logic": "\nMalefic(patric)\nImmaterial(patric)\nnot Awheel(patric)\nImmaterial(vivienne)\nnot Awheel(vivienne)\nChaldean(vivienne)\nChassidic(vivienne)\nnot Peerless(sandro)\nConvex(sandro)\nChassidic(sandro)\nforall x (Chassidic(x) and not Awheel(x) -> Peerless(x))\nforall x (Malefic(x) and Chassidic(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) and Convex(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Chaldean(x) and not Awheel(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Malefic(x) and Immaterial(x) -> Chaldean(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Chassidic(x) -> Chaldean(x))\n\nChassidic(patric)\n\nChassidic(patric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Tabbitha is homocyclic. Tabbitha is sprouted. Tabbitha is not exploded. Letta is sprouted. Letta is not exploded. Letta is anesthetic. Letta is unadvised. Berenice is not fanatic. Berenice is bouncy. Berenice is unadvised. If someone is unadvised and not exploded then they are fanatic. All homocyclic, unadvised people are sprouted. White, bouncy people are sprouted. If someone is anesthetic and not exploded then they are sprouted. Big, sprouted people are anesthetic. If someone is sprouted and unadvised then they are anesthetic. Berenice is not exploded.", "logic": "\nHomocyclic(tabbitha)\nSprouted(tabbitha)\nnot Exploded(tabbitha)\nSprouted(letta)\nnot Exploded(letta)\nAnesthetic(letta)\nUnadvised(letta)\nnot Fanatic(berenice)\nBouncy(berenice)\nUnadvised(berenice)\nforall x (Unadvised(x) and not Exploded(x) -> Fanatic(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and Unadvised(x) -> Sprouted(x))\nforall x (Unadvised(x) and Bouncy(x) -> Sprouted(x))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) and not Exploded(x) -> Sprouted(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and Sprouted(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) and Unadvised(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\n\nnot Exploded(berenice)\n\nnot Exploded(berenice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Robb is accentual. Robb is uncoiled. Robb is not witching. Pamelina is uncoiled. Pamelina is not witching. Pamelina is mammoth. Pamelina is anatomic. Clancy is not mutual. Clancy is favorite. Clancy is anatomic. If someone is anatomic and not witching then they are mutual. All accentual, anatomic people are uncoiled. White, favorite people are uncoiled. If someone is mammoth and not witching then they are uncoiled. Big, uncoiled people are mammoth. If someone is uncoiled and anatomic then they are mammoth. Pamelina is favorite.", "logic": "\nAccentual(robb)\nUncoiled(robb)\nnot Witching(robb)\nUncoiled(pamelina)\nnot Witching(pamelina)\nMammoth(pamelina)\nAnatomic(pamelina)\nnot Mutual(clancy)\nFavorite(clancy)\nAnatomic(clancy)\nforall x (Anatomic(x) and not Witching(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Uncoiled(x))\nforall x (Anatomic(x) and Favorite(x) -> Uncoiled(x))\nforall x (Mammoth(x) and not Witching(x) -> Uncoiled(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) and Uncoiled(x) -> Mammoth(x))\nforall x (Uncoiled(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Mammoth(x))\n\nFavorite(pamelina)\n\nFavorite(pamelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Gusella is protean. Gusella is millennian. Gusella is not monastical. Thomasa is millennian. Thomasa is not monastical. Thomasa is hesitant. Thomasa is statant. Betsy is not colicky. Betsy is unsuasible. Betsy is statant. If someone is statant and not monastical then they are colicky. All protean, statant people are millennian. White, unsuasible people are millennian. If someone is hesitant and not monastical then they are millennian. Big, millennian people are hesitant. If someone is millennian and statant then they are hesitant. Betsy is not protean.", "logic": "\nProtean(gusella)\nMillennian(gusella)\nnot Monastical(gusella)\nMillennian(thomasa)\nnot Monastical(thomasa)\nHesitant(thomasa)\nStatant(thomasa)\nnot Colicky(betsy)\nUnsuasible(betsy)\nStatant(betsy)\nforall x (Statant(x) and not Monastical(x) -> Colicky(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) and Statant(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Statant(x) and Unsuasible(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and not Monastical(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) and Millennian(x) -> Hesitant(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) and Statant(x) -> Hesitant(x))\n\nnot Protean(betsy)\n\nnot Protean(betsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Fredric is hindustani. Fredric is wicked. Fredric is not mental. Bee is wicked. Bee is not mental. Bee is unfocused. Bee is blustery. Boniface is not bituminous. Boniface is precocial. Boniface is blustery. If someone is blustery and not mental then they are bituminous. All hindustani, blustery people are wicked. White, precocial people are wicked. If someone is unfocused and not mental then they are wicked. Big, wicked people are unfocused. If someone is wicked and blustery then they are unfocused. Bee is hindustani.", "logic": "\nHindustani(fredric)\nWicked(fredric)\nnot Mental(fredric)\nWicked(bee)\nnot Mental(bee)\nUnfocused(bee)\nBlustery(bee)\nnot Bituminous(boniface)\nPrecocial(boniface)\nBlustery(boniface)\nforall x (Blustery(x) and not Mental(x) -> Bituminous(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Blustery(x) -> Wicked(x))\nforall x (Blustery(x) and Precocial(x) -> Wicked(x))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and not Mental(x) -> Wicked(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Wicked(x) -> Unfocused(x))\nforall x (Wicked(x) and Blustery(x) -> Unfocused(x))\n\nHindustani(bee)\n\nHindustani(bee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-71"} {"premises": "Bobby is shiny. Bobby is admissive. Bobby is infertile. Bobby is operatic. Bobby is deadening. Bobby is tricksy. Bobby is stooping. Guenna is admissive. Guenna is infertile. Guenna is operatic. Guenna is stooping. Stanfield is admissive. Stanfield is deadening. Stanfield is tricksy. Stanfield is stooping. If someone is infertile and tricksy then they are deadening. If someone is admissive then they are tricksy. Bobby is stooping.", "logic": "\nShiny(bobby)\nAdmissive(bobby)\nInfertile(bobby)\nOperatic(bobby)\nDeadening(bobby)\nTricksy(bobby)\nStooping(bobby)\nAdmissive(guenna)\nInfertile(guenna)\nOperatic(guenna)\nStooping(guenna)\nAdmissive(stanfield)\nDeadening(stanfield)\nTricksy(stanfield)\nStooping(stanfield)\nforall x (Infertile(x) and Tricksy(x) -> Deadening(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Tricksy(x))\n\nStooping(bobby)\n\ntherefore Stooping(bobby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Tiler is biweekly. Tiler is bicentric. Tiler is stereo. Tiler is isotropic. Tiler is monotonous. Tiler is aeronautic. Tiler is moneran. Gertrudis is bicentric. Gertrudis is stereo. Gertrudis is isotropic. Gertrudis is moneran. Moore is bicentric. Moore is monotonous. Moore is aeronautic. Moore is moneran. If someone is stereo and aeronautic then they are monotonous. If someone is bicentric then they are aeronautic. Moore is not aeronautic.", "logic": "\nBiweekly(tiler)\nBicentric(tiler)\nStereo(tiler)\nIsotropic(tiler)\nMonotonous(tiler)\nAeronautic(tiler)\nMoneran(tiler)\nBicentric(gertrudis)\nStereo(gertrudis)\nIsotropic(gertrudis)\nMoneran(gertrudis)\nBicentric(moore)\nMonotonous(moore)\nAeronautic(moore)\nMoneran(moore)\nforall x (Stereo(x) and Aeronautic(x) -> Monotonous(x))\nforall x (Bicentric(x) -> Aeronautic(x))\n\nnot Aeronautic(moore)\n\ntherefore Aeronautic(moore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Lauraine is discerning. Lauraine is cryonic. Lauraine is waspish. Lauraine is chopped. Lauraine is roguish. Lauraine is delicious. Lauraine is mazy. Delphinia is cryonic. Delphinia is waspish. Delphinia is chopped. Delphinia is mazy. Ginger is cryonic. Ginger is roguish. Ginger is delicious. Ginger is mazy. If someone is waspish and delicious then they are roguish. If someone is cryonic then they are delicious. Delphinia is delicious.", "logic": "\nDiscerning(lauraine)\nCryonic(lauraine)\nWaspish(lauraine)\nChopped(lauraine)\nRoguish(lauraine)\nDelicious(lauraine)\nMazy(lauraine)\nCryonic(delphinia)\nWaspish(delphinia)\nChopped(delphinia)\nMazy(delphinia)\nCryonic(ginger)\nRoguish(ginger)\nDelicious(ginger)\nMazy(ginger)\nforall x (Waspish(x) and Delicious(x) -> Roguish(x))\nforall x (Cryonic(x) -> Delicious(x))\n\nDelicious(delphinia)\n\nCryonic(delphinia) and forall x (Cryonic(x) -> Delicious(x)) -> therefore Delicious(delphinia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Gwendolen is scarlet. Gwendolen is deafened. Gwendolen is unpillared. Gwendolen is downlike. Gwendolen is rancid. Gwendolen is insolent. Gwendolen is oxonian. Quigly is deafened. Quigly is unpillared. Quigly is downlike. Quigly is oxonian. Raoul is deafened. Raoul is rancid. Raoul is insolent. Raoul is oxonian. If someone is unpillared and insolent then they are rancid. If someone is deafened then they are insolent. Quigly is not insolent.", "logic": "\nScarlet(gwendolen)\nDeafened(gwendolen)\nUnpillared(gwendolen)\nDownlike(gwendolen)\nRancid(gwendolen)\nInsolent(gwendolen)\nOxonian(gwendolen)\nDeafened(quigly)\nUnpillared(quigly)\nDownlike(quigly)\nOxonian(quigly)\nDeafened(raoul)\nRancid(raoul)\nInsolent(raoul)\nOxonian(raoul)\nforall x (Unpillared(x) and Insolent(x) -> Rancid(x))\nforall x (Deafened(x) -> Insolent(x))\n\nnot Insolent(quigly)\n\nDeafened(quigly) and forall x (Deafened(x) -> Insolent(x)) -> therefore Insolent(quigly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Marianna is venal. Marianna is condolent. Marianna is mistakable. Marianna is peevish. Marianna is haptic. Marianna is unstated. Marianna is fuddled. Robin is condolent. Robin is mistakable. Robin is peevish. Robin is fuddled. Natalina is condolent. Natalina is haptic. Natalina is unstated. Natalina is fuddled. If someone is mistakable and unstated then they are haptic. If someone is condolent then they are unstated. Robin is haptic.", "logic": "\nVenal(marianna)\nCondolent(marianna)\nMistakable(marianna)\nPeevish(marianna)\nHaptic(marianna)\nUnstated(marianna)\nFuddled(marianna)\nCondolent(robin)\nMistakable(robin)\nPeevish(robin)\nFuddled(robin)\nCondolent(natalina)\nHaptic(natalina)\nUnstated(natalina)\nFuddled(natalina)\nforall x (Mistakable(x) and Unstated(x) -> Haptic(x))\nforall x (Condolent(x) -> Unstated(x))\n\nHaptic(robin)\n\nCondolent(robin) and forall x (Condolent(x) -> Unstated(x)) -> therefore Unstated(robin) Mistakable(robin) and Unstated(robin) and forall x (Mistakable(x) and Unstated(x) -> Haptic(x)) -> therefore Haptic(robin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Griffith is medicative. Griffith is bedless. Griffith is comal. Griffith is thenal. Griffith is mortified. Griffith is localised. Griffith is tenured. Mildred is bedless. Mildred is comal. Mildred is thenal. Mildred is tenured. Scot is bedless. Scot is mortified. Scot is localised. Scot is tenured. If someone is comal and localised then they are mortified. If someone is bedless then they are localised. Mildred is not mortified.", "logic": "\nMedicative(griffith)\nBedless(griffith)\nComal(griffith)\nThenal(griffith)\nMortified(griffith)\nLocalised(griffith)\nTenured(griffith)\nBedless(mildred)\nComal(mildred)\nThenal(mildred)\nTenured(mildred)\nBedless(scot)\nMortified(scot)\nLocalised(scot)\nTenured(scot)\nforall x (Comal(x) and Localised(x) -> Mortified(x))\nforall x (Bedless(x) -> Localised(x))\n\nnot Mortified(mildred)\n\nBedless(mildred) and forall x (Bedless(x) -> Localised(x)) -> therefore Localised(mildred) Comal(mildred) and Localised(mildred) and forall x (Comal(x) and Localised(x) -> Mortified(x)) -> therefore Mortified(mildred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Marit is wild. Marit is paneled. Marit is leftist. Marit is advance. Marit is inferior. Marit is scoreless. Marit is trifoliate. Leese is paneled. Leese is leftist. Leese is advance. Leese is trifoliate. Giles is paneled. Giles is inferior. Giles is scoreless. Giles is trifoliate. If someone is leftist and scoreless then they are inferior. If someone is paneled then they are scoreless. Giles is not leftist.", "logic": "\nWild(marit)\nPaneled(marit)\nLeftist(marit)\nAdvance(marit)\nInferior(marit)\nScoreless(marit)\nTrifoliate(marit)\nPaneled(leese)\nLeftist(leese)\nAdvance(leese)\nTrifoliate(leese)\nPaneled(giles)\nInferior(giles)\nScoreless(giles)\nTrifoliate(giles)\nforall x (Leftist(x) and Scoreless(x) -> Inferior(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Scoreless(x))\n\nnot Leftist(giles)\n\nnot Leftist(giles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Ike is southeast. Ike is ageless. Ike is utilised. Ike is storied. Ike is adopted. Ike is septuple. Ike is renascent. Sutton is ageless. Sutton is utilised. Sutton is storied. Sutton is renascent. Hinda is ageless. Hinda is adopted. Hinda is septuple. Hinda is renascent. If someone is utilised and septuple then they are adopted. If someone is ageless then they are septuple. Sutton is southeast.", "logic": "\nSoutheast(ike)\nAgeless(ike)\nUtilised(ike)\nStoried(ike)\nAdopted(ike)\nSeptuple(ike)\nRenascent(ike)\nAgeless(sutton)\nUtilised(sutton)\nStoried(sutton)\nRenascent(sutton)\nAgeless(hinda)\nAdopted(hinda)\nSeptuple(hinda)\nRenascent(hinda)\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Septuple(x) -> Adopted(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Septuple(x))\n\nSoutheast(sutton)\n\nSoutheast(sutton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Aviva is lactogenic. Aviva is bigger. Aviva is collective. Aviva is surviving. Aviva is perirhinal. Aviva is brazilian. Aviva is medusoid. Yolande is bigger. Yolande is collective. Yolande is surviving. Yolande is medusoid. Randene is bigger. Randene is perirhinal. Randene is brazilian. Randene is medusoid. If someone is collective and brazilian then they are perirhinal. If someone is bigger then they are brazilian. Randene is not surviving.", "logic": "\nLactogenic(aviva)\nBigger(aviva)\nCollective(aviva)\nSurviving(aviva)\nPerirhinal(aviva)\nBrazilian(aviva)\nMedusoid(aviva)\nBigger(yolande)\nCollective(yolande)\nSurviving(yolande)\nMedusoid(yolande)\nBigger(randene)\nPerirhinal(randene)\nBrazilian(randene)\nMedusoid(randene)\nforall x (Collective(x) and Brazilian(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Brazilian(x))\n\nnot Surviving(randene)\n\nnot Surviving(randene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Kraig is epical. Kraig is cruciate. Kraig is euphonical. Kraig is playable. Kraig is bosomy. Kraig is leakproof. Kraig is compact. Barrie is cruciate. Barrie is euphonical. Barrie is playable. Barrie is compact. Karna is cruciate. Karna is bosomy. Karna is leakproof. Karna is compact. If someone is euphonical and leakproof then they are bosomy. If someone is cruciate then they are leakproof. Karna is epical.", "logic": "\nEpical(kraig)\nCruciate(kraig)\nEuphonical(kraig)\nPlayable(kraig)\nBosomy(kraig)\nLeakproof(kraig)\nCompact(kraig)\nCruciate(barrie)\nEuphonical(barrie)\nPlayable(barrie)\nCompact(barrie)\nCruciate(karna)\nBosomy(karna)\nLeakproof(karna)\nCompact(karna)\nforall x (Euphonical(x) and Leakproof(x) -> Bosomy(x))\nforall x (Cruciate(x) -> Leakproof(x))\n\nEpical(karna)\n\nEpical(karna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-810"} {"premises": "Arda is sharpened. Arda is sciolistic. Arda is somatic. Arda is sodding. Arda is spotless. Arda is unshapely. Sybil is sharpened. Sybil is somatic. Sybil is sodding. Sybil is spotless. Sybil is unshapely. Franny is sharpened. Franny is acoustic. Franny is somatic. Franny is sodding. Franny is spotless. Kind people are spotless. All acoustic, spotless people are sodding. All unshapely, sodding people are spotless. If Franny is somatic and Franny is sodding then Franny is sciolistic. All spotless people are sodding. Young, sciolistic people are sodding. If someone is somatic and sodding then they are sharpened. Red, sciolistic people are unshapely. Arda is somatic.", "logic": "\nSharpened(arda)\nSciolistic(arda)\nSomatic(arda)\nSodding(arda)\nSpotless(arda)\nUnshapely(arda)\nSharpened(sybil)\nSomatic(sybil)\nSodding(sybil)\nSpotless(sybil)\nUnshapely(sybil)\nSharpened(franny)\nAcoustic(franny)\nSomatic(franny)\nSodding(franny)\nSpotless(franny)\nforall x (Acoustic(x) -> Spotless(x))\nforall x (Acoustic(x) and Spotless(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) and Sodding(x) -> Spotless(x))\nSomatic(franny) and Sodding(franny) -> Sciolistic(franny)\nforall x (Spotless(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) and Sodding(x) -> Sharpened(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> Unshapely(x))\n\nSomatic(arda)\n\ntherefore Somatic(arda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "Tedra is perirhinal. Tedra is chaetal. Tedra is mongol. Tedra is estuarial. Tedra is aramaean. Tedra is revealing. Armstrong is perirhinal. Armstrong is mongol. Armstrong is estuarial. Armstrong is aramaean. Armstrong is revealing. Alton is perirhinal. Alton is unkind. Alton is mongol. Alton is estuarial. Alton is aramaean. Kind people are aramaean. All unkind, aramaean people are estuarial. All revealing, estuarial people are aramaean. If Alton is mongol and Alton is estuarial then Alton is chaetal. All aramaean people are estuarial. Young, chaetal people are estuarial. If someone is mongol and estuarial then they are perirhinal. Red, chaetal people are revealing. Armstrong is not aramaean.", "logic": "\nPerirhinal(tedra)\nChaetal(tedra)\nMongol(tedra)\nEstuarial(tedra)\nAramaean(tedra)\nRevealing(tedra)\nPerirhinal(armstrong)\nMongol(armstrong)\nEstuarial(armstrong)\nAramaean(armstrong)\nRevealing(armstrong)\nPerirhinal(alton)\nUnkind(alton)\nMongol(alton)\nEstuarial(alton)\nAramaean(alton)\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Aramaean(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) and Aramaean(x) -> Estuarial(x))\nforall x (Revealing(x) and Estuarial(x) -> Aramaean(x))\nMongol(alton) and Estuarial(alton) -> Chaetal(alton)\nforall x (Aramaean(x) -> Estuarial(x))\nforall x (Revealing(x) and Chaetal(x) -> Estuarial(x))\nforall x (Mongol(x) and Estuarial(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Mongol(x) and Chaetal(x) -> Revealing(x))\n\nnot Aramaean(armstrong)\n\ntherefore Aramaean(armstrong)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "Edee is relevant. Edee is clotted. Edee is salvadoran. Edee is balding. Edee is intrinsic. Edee is prognathic. Rab is relevant. Rab is salvadoran. Rab is balding. Rab is intrinsic. Rab is prognathic. Nikolai is relevant. Nikolai is magenta. Nikolai is salvadoran. Nikolai is balding. Nikolai is intrinsic. Kind people are intrinsic. All magenta, intrinsic people are balding. All prognathic, balding people are intrinsic. If Nikolai is salvadoran and Nikolai is balding then Nikolai is clotted. All intrinsic people are balding. Young, clotted people are balding. If someone is salvadoran and balding then they are relevant. Red, clotted people are prognathic. Nikolai is clotted.", "logic": "\nRelevant(edee)\nClotted(edee)\nSalvadoran(edee)\nBalding(edee)\nIntrinsic(edee)\nPrognathic(edee)\nRelevant(rab)\nSalvadoran(rab)\nBalding(rab)\nIntrinsic(rab)\nPrognathic(rab)\nRelevant(nikolai)\nMagenta(nikolai)\nSalvadoran(nikolai)\nBalding(nikolai)\nIntrinsic(nikolai)\nforall x (Magenta(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Magenta(x) and Intrinsic(x) -> Balding(x))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) and Balding(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nSalvadoran(nikolai) and Balding(nikolai) -> Clotted(nikolai)\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Balding(x))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) and Clotted(x) -> Balding(x))\nforall x (Salvadoran(x) and Balding(x) -> Relevant(x))\nforall x (Salvadoran(x) and Clotted(x) -> Prognathic(x))\n\nClotted(nikolai)\n\nSalvadoran(nikolai) and Balding(nikolai) and Salvadoran(nikolai) and Balding(nikolai) -> Clotted(nikolai) -> therefore Clotted(nikolai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "Aleck is brachiopod. Aleck is bombastic. Aleck is combatant. Aleck is actionable. Aleck is liveborn. Aleck is copious. Burl is brachiopod. Burl is combatant. Burl is actionable. Burl is liveborn. Burl is copious. Luce is brachiopod. Luce is encircling. Luce is combatant. Luce is actionable. Luce is liveborn. Kind people are liveborn. All encircling, liveborn people are actionable. All copious, actionable people are liveborn. If Luce is combatant and Luce is actionable then Luce is bombastic. All liveborn people are actionable. Young, bombastic people are actionable. If someone is combatant and actionable then they are brachiopod. Red, bombastic people are copious. Luce is not bombastic.", "logic": "\nBrachiopod(aleck)\nBombastic(aleck)\nCombatant(aleck)\nActionable(aleck)\nLiveborn(aleck)\nCopious(aleck)\nBrachiopod(burl)\nCombatant(burl)\nActionable(burl)\nLiveborn(burl)\nCopious(burl)\nBrachiopod(luce)\nEncircling(luce)\nCombatant(luce)\nActionable(luce)\nLiveborn(luce)\nforall x (Encircling(x) -> Liveborn(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Liveborn(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) and Actionable(x) -> Liveborn(x))\nCombatant(luce) and Actionable(luce) -> Bombastic(luce)\nforall x (Liveborn(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) and Bombastic(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Actionable(x) -> Brachiopod(x))\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Bombastic(x) -> Copious(x))\n\nnot Bombastic(luce)\n\nCombatant(luce) and Actionable(luce) and Combatant(luce) and Actionable(luce) -> Bombastic(luce) -> therefore Bombastic(luce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "Brooke is must. Brooke is unlawful. Brooke is prudential. Brooke is botanical. Brooke is excusatory. Brooke is meiotic. Alister is must. Alister is prudential. Alister is botanical. Alister is excusatory. Alister is meiotic. Margi is must. Margi is operative. Margi is prudential. Margi is botanical. Margi is excusatory. Kind people are excusatory. All operative, excusatory people are botanical. All meiotic, botanical people are excusatory. If Margi is prudential and Margi is botanical then Margi is unlawful. All excusatory people are botanical. Young, unlawful people are botanical. If someone is prudential and botanical then they are must. Red, unlawful people are meiotic. Margi is meiotic.", "logic": "\nMust(brooke)\nUnlawful(brooke)\nPrudential(brooke)\nBotanical(brooke)\nExcusatory(brooke)\nMeiotic(brooke)\nMust(alister)\nPrudential(alister)\nBotanical(alister)\nExcusatory(alister)\nMeiotic(alister)\nMust(margi)\nOperative(margi)\nPrudential(margi)\nBotanical(margi)\nExcusatory(margi)\nforall x (Operative(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Operative(x) and Excusatory(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Botanical(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nPrudential(margi) and Botanical(margi) -> Unlawful(margi)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Unlawful(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Prudential(x) and Botanical(x) -> Must(x))\nforall x (Prudential(x) and Unlawful(x) -> Meiotic(x))\n\nMeiotic(margi)\n\nPrudential(margi) and Botanical(margi) and Prudential(margi) and Botanical(margi) -> Unlawful(margi) -> therefore Unlawful(margi) Prudential(margi) and Unlawful(margi) and forall x (Prudential(x) and Unlawful(x) -> Meiotic(x)) -> therefore Meiotic(margi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "Phelia is lucky. Phelia is shaky. Phelia is distracted. Phelia is hiemal. Phelia is defiant. Phelia is parenteral. Elva is lucky. Elva is distracted. Elva is hiemal. Elva is defiant. Elva is parenteral. Jamima is lucky. Jamima is seriocomic. Jamima is distracted. Jamima is hiemal. Jamima is defiant. Kind people are defiant. All seriocomic, defiant people are hiemal. All parenteral, hiemal people are defiant. If Jamima is distracted and Jamima is hiemal then Jamima is shaky. All defiant people are hiemal. Young, shaky people are hiemal. If someone is distracted and hiemal then they are lucky. Red, shaky people are parenteral. Jamima is not parenteral.", "logic": "\nLucky(phelia)\nShaky(phelia)\nDistracted(phelia)\nHiemal(phelia)\nDefiant(phelia)\nParenteral(phelia)\nLucky(elva)\nDistracted(elva)\nHiemal(elva)\nDefiant(elva)\nParenteral(elva)\nLucky(jamima)\nSeriocomic(jamima)\nDistracted(jamima)\nHiemal(jamima)\nDefiant(jamima)\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) -> Defiant(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) and Defiant(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Parenteral(x) and Hiemal(x) -> Defiant(x))\nDistracted(jamima) and Hiemal(jamima) -> Shaky(jamima)\nforall x (Defiant(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Parenteral(x) and Shaky(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) and Hiemal(x) -> Lucky(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) and Shaky(x) -> Parenteral(x))\n\nnot Parenteral(jamima)\n\nDistracted(jamima) and Hiemal(jamima) and Distracted(jamima) and Hiemal(jamima) -> Shaky(jamima) -> therefore Shaky(jamima) Distracted(jamima) and Shaky(jamima) and forall x (Distracted(x) and Shaky(x) -> Parenteral(x)) -> therefore Parenteral(jamima)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "Marne is outmost. Marne is unpainful. Marne is aquiferous. Marne is vitalizing. Marne is biggish. Marne is grim. Ashton is outmost. Ashton is aquiferous. Ashton is vitalizing. Ashton is biggish. Ashton is grim. Corri is outmost. Corri is senescent. Corri is aquiferous. Corri is vitalizing. Corri is biggish. Kind people are biggish. All senescent, biggish people are vitalizing. All grim, vitalizing people are biggish. If Corri is aquiferous and Corri is vitalizing then Corri is unpainful. All biggish people are vitalizing. Young, unpainful people are vitalizing. If someone is aquiferous and vitalizing then they are outmost. Red, unpainful people are grim. Ashton is not unpainful.", "logic": "\nOutmost(marne)\nUnpainful(marne)\nAquiferous(marne)\nVitalizing(marne)\nBiggish(marne)\nGrim(marne)\nOutmost(ashton)\nAquiferous(ashton)\nVitalizing(ashton)\nBiggish(ashton)\nGrim(ashton)\nOutmost(corri)\nSenescent(corri)\nAquiferous(corri)\nVitalizing(corri)\nBiggish(corri)\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Biggish(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Grim(x) and Vitalizing(x) -> Biggish(x))\nAquiferous(corri) and Vitalizing(corri) -> Unpainful(corri)\nforall x (Biggish(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Grim(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) and Vitalizing(x) -> Outmost(x))\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Grim(x))\n\nnot Unpainful(ashton)\n\nnot Unpainful(ashton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "Fiorenze is senescent. Fiorenze is moveable. Fiorenze is payable. Fiorenze is germanic. Fiorenze is inlaid. Fiorenze is eccrine. Clayborn is senescent. Clayborn is payable. Clayborn is germanic. Clayborn is inlaid. Clayborn is eccrine. Dinnie is senescent. Dinnie is disjoint. Dinnie is payable. Dinnie is germanic. Dinnie is inlaid. Kind people are inlaid. All disjoint, inlaid people are germanic. All eccrine, germanic people are inlaid. If Dinnie is payable and Dinnie is germanic then Dinnie is moveable. All inlaid people are germanic. Young, moveable people are germanic. If someone is payable and germanic then they are senescent. Red, moveable people are eccrine. Fiorenze is disjoint.", "logic": "\nSenescent(fiorenze)\nMoveable(fiorenze)\nPayable(fiorenze)\nGermanic(fiorenze)\nInlaid(fiorenze)\nEccrine(fiorenze)\nSenescent(clayborn)\nPayable(clayborn)\nGermanic(clayborn)\nInlaid(clayborn)\nEccrine(clayborn)\nSenescent(dinnie)\nDisjoint(dinnie)\nPayable(dinnie)\nGermanic(dinnie)\nInlaid(dinnie)\nforall x (Disjoint(x) -> Inlaid(x))\nforall x (Disjoint(x) and Inlaid(x) -> Germanic(x))\nforall x (Eccrine(x) and Germanic(x) -> Inlaid(x))\nPayable(dinnie) and Germanic(dinnie) -> Moveable(dinnie)\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Germanic(x))\nforall x (Eccrine(x) and Moveable(x) -> Germanic(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) and Germanic(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) and Moveable(x) -> Eccrine(x))\n\nDisjoint(fiorenze)\n\nDisjoint(fiorenze) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The pippa scrimmage the berchtold. The berchtold scrimmage the pippa. The celestyn is fossil. If someone is fossil and sodding then they do not chase the berchtold. If the pippa blackleg the celestyn then the pippa does not see the celestyn. If someone scrimmage the pippa then the pippa sodomize the celestyn. If the pippa scrimmage the celestyn and the celestyn is equitable then the celestyn sodomize the berchtold. If someone scrimmage the celestyn and they do not chase the berchtold then they see the celestyn. If someone sodomize the celestyn then they do not eat the pippa. The pippa scrimmage the berchtold.", "logic": "\nScrimmage(pippa, berchtold)\nScrimmage(berchtold, pippa)\nFossil(celestyn)\nforall x (Fossil(x) and Sodding(x) -> not Scrimmage(x, berchtold))\nBlackleg(pippa, celestyn) -> not Sodomize(pippa, celestyn)\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, pippa) -> Sodomize(pippa, celestyn))\nScrimmage(pippa, celestyn) and Equitable(celestyn) -> Sodomize(celestyn, berchtold)\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, celestyn) and not Scrimmage(x, berchtold) -> Sodomize(x, celestyn))\nforall x (Sodomize(x, celestyn) -> not Blackleg(x, pippa))\n\nScrimmage(pippa, berchtold)\n\ntherefore Scrimmage(pippa, berchtold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The kylynn nett the rinaldo. The rinaldo nett the kylynn. The wilone is tops. If someone is tops and eupneic then they do not chase the rinaldo. If the kylynn inspissate the wilone then the kylynn does not see the wilone. If someone nett the kylynn then the kylynn billet the wilone. If the kylynn nett the wilone and the wilone is botonnee then the wilone billet the rinaldo. If someone nett the wilone and they do not chase the rinaldo then they see the wilone. If someone billet the wilone then they do not eat the kylynn. The kylynn does not chase the rinaldo.", "logic": "\nNett(kylynn, rinaldo)\nNett(rinaldo, kylynn)\nTops(wilone)\nforall x (Tops(x) and Eupneic(x) -> not Nett(x, rinaldo))\nInspissate(kylynn, wilone) -> not Billet(kylynn, wilone)\nforall x (Nett(x, kylynn) -> Billet(kylynn, wilone))\nNett(kylynn, wilone) and Botonnee(wilone) -> Billet(wilone, rinaldo)\nforall x (Nett(x, wilone) and not Nett(x, rinaldo) -> Billet(x, wilone))\nforall x (Billet(x, wilone) -> not Inspissate(x, kylynn))\n\nnot Nett(kylynn, rinaldo)\n\ntherefore Nett(kylynn, rinaldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The johny legalise the dixie. The dixie legalise the johny. The maynard is caddish. If someone is caddish and bibless then they do not chase the dixie. If the johny unhallow the maynard then the johny does not see the maynard. If someone legalise the johny then the johny stanch the maynard. If the johny legalise the maynard and the maynard is stippled then the maynard stanch the dixie. If someone legalise the maynard and they do not chase the dixie then they see the maynard. If someone stanch the maynard then they do not eat the johny. The johny stanch the maynard.", "logic": "\nLegalise(johny, dixie)\nLegalise(dixie, johny)\nCaddish(maynard)\nforall x (Caddish(x) and Bibless(x) -> not Legalise(x, dixie))\nUnhallow(johny, maynard) -> not Stanch(johny, maynard)\nforall x (Legalise(x, johny) -> Stanch(johny, maynard))\nLegalise(johny, maynard) and Stippled(maynard) -> Stanch(maynard, dixie)\nforall x (Legalise(x, maynard) and not Legalise(x, dixie) -> Stanch(x, maynard))\nforall x (Stanch(x, maynard) -> not Unhallow(x, johny))\n\nStanch(johny, maynard)\n\nLegalise(dixie, johny) and forall x (Legalise(x, johny) -> Stanch(johny, maynard)) -> therefore Stanch(johny, maynard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The skipton crew the neville. The neville crew the skipton. The lavena is burdenless. If someone is burdenless and effusive then they do not chase the neville. If the skipton breast the lavena then the skipton does not see the lavena. If someone crew the skipton then the skipton prepossess the lavena. If the skipton crew the lavena and the lavena is depressant then the lavena prepossess the neville. If someone crew the lavena and they do not chase the neville then they see the lavena. If someone prepossess the lavena then they do not eat the skipton. The skipton does not see the lavena.", "logic": "\nCrew(skipton, neville)\nCrew(neville, skipton)\nBurdenless(lavena)\nforall x (Burdenless(x) and Effusive(x) -> not Crew(x, neville))\nBreast(skipton, lavena) -> not Prepossess(skipton, lavena)\nforall x (Crew(x, skipton) -> Prepossess(skipton, lavena))\nCrew(skipton, lavena) and Depressant(lavena) -> Prepossess(lavena, neville)\nforall x (Crew(x, lavena) and not Crew(x, neville) -> Prepossess(x, lavena))\nforall x (Prepossess(x, lavena) -> not Breast(x, skipton))\n\nnot Prepossess(skipton, lavena)\n\nCrew(neville, skipton) and forall x (Crew(x, skipton) -> Prepossess(skipton, lavena)) -> therefore Prepossess(skipton, lavena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The spiros indorse the euphemia. The euphemia indorse the spiros. The ginger is amitotic. If someone is amitotic and colonnaded then they do not chase the euphemia. If the spiros quench the ginger then the spiros does not see the ginger. If someone indorse the spiros then the spiros narrate the ginger. If the spiros indorse the ginger and the ginger is efferent then the ginger narrate the euphemia. If someone indorse the ginger and they do not chase the euphemia then they see the ginger. If someone narrate the ginger then they do not eat the spiros. The spiros does not eat the spiros.", "logic": "\nIndorse(spiros, euphemia)\nIndorse(euphemia, spiros)\nAmitotic(ginger)\nforall x (Amitotic(x) and Colonnaded(x) -> not Indorse(x, euphemia))\nQuench(spiros, ginger) -> not Narrate(spiros, ginger)\nforall x (Indorse(x, spiros) -> Narrate(spiros, ginger))\nIndorse(spiros, ginger) and Efferent(ginger) -> Narrate(ginger, euphemia)\nforall x (Indorse(x, ginger) and not Indorse(x, euphemia) -> Narrate(x, ginger))\nforall x (Narrate(x, ginger) -> not Quench(x, spiros))\n\nnot Quench(spiros, spiros)\n\nIndorse(euphemia, spiros) and forall x (Indorse(x, spiros) -> Narrate(spiros, ginger)) -> therefore Narrate(spiros, ginger) Narrate(spiros, ginger) and forall x (Narrate(x, ginger) -> not Quench(x, spiros)) -> therefore not Quench(spiros, spiros)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The elden lactate the baxter. The baxter lactate the elden. The julie is hick. If someone is hick and thinkable then they do not chase the baxter. If the elden destroy the julie then the elden does not see the julie. If someone lactate the elden then the elden traumatise the julie. If the elden lactate the julie and the julie is tensional then the julie traumatise the baxter. If someone lactate the julie and they do not chase the baxter then they see the julie. If someone traumatise the julie then they do not eat the elden. The elden destroy the elden.", "logic": "\nLactate(elden, baxter)\nLactate(baxter, elden)\nHick(julie)\nforall x (Hick(x) and Thinkable(x) -> not Lactate(x, baxter))\nDestroy(elden, julie) -> not Traumatise(elden, julie)\nforall x (Lactate(x, elden) -> Traumatise(elden, julie))\nLactate(elden, julie) and Tensional(julie) -> Traumatise(julie, baxter)\nforall x (Lactate(x, julie) and not Lactate(x, baxter) -> Traumatise(x, julie))\nforall x (Traumatise(x, julie) -> not Destroy(x, elden))\n\nDestroy(elden, elden)\n\nLactate(baxter, elden) and forall x (Lactate(x, elden) -> Traumatise(elden, julie)) -> therefore Traumatise(elden, julie) Traumatise(elden, julie) and forall x (Traumatise(x, julie) -> not Destroy(x, elden)) -> therefore not Destroy(elden, elden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The jacki peak the paulette. The paulette peak the jacki. The harriett is nocent. If someone is nocent and upsetting then they do not chase the paulette. If the jacki adulterate the harriett then the jacki does not see the harriett. If someone peak the jacki then the jacki layer the harriett. If the jacki peak the harriett and the harriett is circadian then the harriett layer the paulette. If someone peak the harriett and they do not chase the paulette then they see the harriett. If someone layer the harriett then they do not eat the jacki. The paulette does not see the harriett.", "logic": "\nPeak(jacki, paulette)\nPeak(paulette, jacki)\nNocent(harriett)\nforall x (Nocent(x) and Upsetting(x) -> not Peak(x, paulette))\nAdulterate(jacki, harriett) -> not Layer(jacki, harriett)\nforall x (Peak(x, jacki) -> Layer(jacki, harriett))\nPeak(jacki, harriett) and Circadian(harriett) -> Layer(harriett, paulette)\nforall x (Peak(x, harriett) and not Peak(x, paulette) -> Layer(x, harriett))\nforall x (Layer(x, harriett) -> not Adulterate(x, jacki))\n\nnot Layer(paulette, harriett)\n\nforall x (Peak(x, harriett) and not Peak(x, paulette) -> Layer(x, harriett)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The wandie white the sullivan. The sullivan white the wandie. The tandi is arcadian. If someone is arcadian and unrested then they do not chase the sullivan. If the wandie tissue the tandi then the wandie does not see the tandi. If someone white the wandie then the wandie lumber the tandi. If the wandie white the tandi and the tandi is apomictic then the tandi lumber the sullivan. If someone white the tandi and they do not chase the sullivan then they see the tandi. If someone lumber the tandi then they do not eat the wandie. The tandi lumber the sullivan.", "logic": "\nWhite(wandie, sullivan)\nWhite(sullivan, wandie)\nArcadian(tandi)\nforall x (Arcadian(x) and Unrested(x) -> not White(x, sullivan))\nTissue(wandie, tandi) -> not Lumber(wandie, tandi)\nforall x (White(x, wandie) -> Lumber(wandie, tandi))\nWhite(wandie, tandi) and Apomictic(tandi) -> Lumber(tandi, sullivan)\nforall x (White(x, tandi) and not White(x, sullivan) -> Lumber(x, tandi))\nforall x (Lumber(x, tandi) -> not Tissue(x, wandie))\n\nLumber(tandi, sullivan)\n\nWhite(wandie, tandi) and Apomictic(tandi) -> Lumber(tandi, sullivan) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The arda renovate the nevins. The nevins renovate the arda. The roana is unbleached. If someone is unbleached and lengthy then they do not chase the nevins. If the arda film the roana then the arda does not see the roana. If someone renovate the arda then the arda feudalize the roana. If the arda renovate the roana and the roana is nimble then the roana feudalize the nevins. If someone renovate the roana and they do not chase the nevins then they see the roana. If someone feudalize the roana then they do not eat the arda. The roana does not see the roana.", "logic": "\nRenovate(arda, nevins)\nRenovate(nevins, arda)\nUnbleached(roana)\nforall x (Unbleached(x) and Lengthy(x) -> not Renovate(x, nevins))\nFilm(arda, roana) -> not Feudalize(arda, roana)\nforall x (Renovate(x, arda) -> Feudalize(arda, roana))\nRenovate(arda, roana) and Nimble(roana) -> Feudalize(roana, nevins)\nforall x (Renovate(x, roana) and not Renovate(x, nevins) -> Feudalize(x, roana))\nforall x (Feudalize(x, roana) -> not Film(x, arda))\n\nnot Feudalize(roana, roana)\n\nforall x (Renovate(x, roana) and not Renovate(x, nevins) -> Feudalize(x, roana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The darcey tread the sharia. The sharia tread the darcey. The irita is bathetic. If someone is bathetic and woozy then they do not chase the sharia. If the darcey drudge the irita then the darcey does not see the irita. If someone tread the darcey then the darcey pulp the irita. If the darcey tread the irita and the irita is squelched then the irita pulp the sharia. If someone tread the irita and they do not chase the sharia then they see the irita. If someone pulp the irita then they do not eat the darcey. The darcey tread the irita.", "logic": "\nTread(darcey, sharia)\nTread(sharia, darcey)\nBathetic(irita)\nforall x (Bathetic(x) and Woozy(x) -> not Tread(x, sharia))\nDrudge(darcey, irita) -> not Pulp(darcey, irita)\nforall x (Tread(x, darcey) -> Pulp(darcey, irita))\nTread(darcey, irita) and Squelched(irita) -> Pulp(irita, sharia)\nforall x (Tread(x, irita) and not Tread(x, sharia) -> Pulp(x, irita))\nforall x (Pulp(x, irita) -> not Drudge(x, darcey))\n\nTread(darcey, irita)\n\nTread(darcey, irita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The meghan fricassee the ramon. The ramon fricassee the meghan. The allene is panicked. If someone is panicked and unversed then they do not chase the ramon. If the meghan expedite the allene then the meghan does not see the allene. If someone fricassee the meghan then the meghan disrespect the allene. If the meghan fricassee the allene and the allene is luscious then the allene disrespect the ramon. If someone fricassee the allene and they do not chase the ramon then they see the allene. If someone disrespect the allene then they do not eat the meghan. The ramon is not luscious.", "logic": "\nFricassee(meghan, ramon)\nFricassee(ramon, meghan)\nPanicked(allene)\nforall x (Panicked(x) and Unversed(x) -> not Fricassee(x, ramon))\nExpedite(meghan, allene) -> not Disrespect(meghan, allene)\nforall x (Fricassee(x, meghan) -> Disrespect(meghan, allene))\nFricassee(meghan, allene) and Luscious(allene) -> Disrespect(allene, ramon)\nforall x (Fricassee(x, allene) and not Fricassee(x, ramon) -> Disrespect(x, allene))\nforall x (Disrespect(x, allene) -> not Expedite(x, meghan))\n\nnot Luscious(ramon)\n\nnot Luscious(ramon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "The bertram alcoholise the michel. The michel alcoholise the bertram. The myrtice is mastoidal. If someone is mastoidal and linelike then they do not chase the michel. If the bertram instigate the myrtice then the bertram does not see the myrtice. If someone alcoholise the bertram then the bertram illuminate the myrtice. If the bertram alcoholise the myrtice and the myrtice is apotropaic then the myrtice illuminate the michel. If someone alcoholise the myrtice and they do not chase the michel then they see the myrtice. If someone illuminate the myrtice then they do not eat the bertram. The michel alcoholise the michel.", "logic": "\nAlcoholise(bertram, michel)\nAlcoholise(michel, bertram)\nMastoidal(myrtice)\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) and Linelike(x) -> not Alcoholise(x, michel))\nInstigate(bertram, myrtice) -> not Illuminate(bertram, myrtice)\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, bertram) -> Illuminate(bertram, myrtice))\nAlcoholise(bertram, myrtice) and Apotropaic(myrtice) -> Illuminate(myrtice, michel)\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, myrtice) and not Alcoholise(x, michel) -> Illuminate(x, myrtice))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, myrtice) -> not Instigate(x, bertram))\n\nAlcoholise(michel, michel)\n\nAlcoholise(michel, michel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Wrennie is coronary. Angele is hawaiian. Dina is fazed. If someone is bogartian then they are hawaiian. If someone is fazed then they are bogartian. If Dina is not bogartian then Dina is blastular. Wrennie is coronary.", "logic": "\nCoronary(wrennie)\nHawaiian(angele)\nFazed(dina)\nforall x (Bogartian(x) -> Hawaiian(x))\nforall x (Fazed(x) -> Bogartian(x))\nnot Bogartian(dina) -> Blastular(dina)\n\nCoronary(wrennie)\n\ntherefore Coronary(wrennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Luella is datable. Chastity is played. Jasmin is buggy. If someone is idolatrous then they are played. If someone is buggy then they are idolatrous. If Jasmin is not idolatrous then Jasmin is lxii. Luella is not datable.", "logic": "\nDatable(luella)\nPlayed(chastity)\nBuggy(jasmin)\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) -> Played(x))\nforall x (Buggy(x) -> Idolatrous(x))\nnot Idolatrous(jasmin) -> Lxii(jasmin)\n\nnot Datable(luella)\n\ntherefore Datable(luella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Mairead is hydrated. Trudy is unextended. Dorri is impetuous. If someone is blest then they are unextended. If someone is impetuous then they are blest. If Dorri is not blest then Dorri is surprising. Dorri is blest.", "logic": "\nHydrated(mairead)\nUnextended(trudy)\nImpetuous(dorri)\nforall x (Blest(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) -> Blest(x))\nnot Blest(dorri) -> Surprising(dorri)\n\nBlest(dorri)\n\nImpetuous(dorri) and forall x (Impetuous(x) -> Blest(x)) -> therefore Blest(dorri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Legra is wistful. Darth is anhydrous. Hana is windup. If someone is patient then they are anhydrous. If someone is windup then they are patient. If Hana is not patient then Hana is hierarchal. Hana is not patient.", "logic": "\nWistful(legra)\nAnhydrous(darth)\nWindup(hana)\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\nforall x (Windup(x) -> Patient(x))\nnot Patient(hana) -> Hierarchal(hana)\n\nnot Patient(hana)\n\nWindup(hana) and forall x (Windup(x) -> Patient(x)) -> therefore Patient(hana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Elberta is prickly. Hurley is presto. Tomlin is analog. If someone is unfeasible then they are presto. If someone is analog then they are unfeasible. If Tomlin is not unfeasible then Tomlin is invariant. Tomlin is presto.", "logic": "\nPrickly(elberta)\nPresto(hurley)\nAnalog(tomlin)\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Analog(x) -> Unfeasible(x))\nnot Unfeasible(tomlin) -> Invariant(tomlin)\n\nPresto(tomlin)\n\nAnalog(tomlin) and forall x (Analog(x) -> Unfeasible(x)) -> therefore Unfeasible(tomlin) Unfeasible(tomlin) and forall x (Unfeasible(x) -> Presto(x)) -> therefore Presto(tomlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Sinead is articled. Danyette is multilevel. Skippie is axonal. If someone is withdrawn then they are multilevel. If someone is axonal then they are withdrawn. If Skippie is not withdrawn then Skippie is strenuous. Skippie is not multilevel.", "logic": "\nArticled(sinead)\nMultilevel(danyette)\nAxonal(skippie)\nforall x (Withdrawn(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Axonal(x) -> Withdrawn(x))\nnot Withdrawn(skippie) -> Strenuous(skippie)\n\nnot Multilevel(skippie)\n\nAxonal(skippie) and forall x (Axonal(x) -> Withdrawn(x)) -> therefore Withdrawn(skippie) Withdrawn(skippie) and forall x (Withdrawn(x) -> Multilevel(x)) -> therefore Multilevel(skippie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Elmore is ungainly. Otha is alleviated. Roxi is bounteous. If someone is sumptuous then they are alleviated. If someone is bounteous then they are sumptuous. If Roxi is not sumptuous then Roxi is cephalopod. Otha is not sumptuous.", "logic": "\nUngainly(elmore)\nAlleviated(otha)\nBounteous(roxi)\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Alleviated(x))\nforall x (Bounteous(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nnot Sumptuous(roxi) -> Cephalopod(roxi)\n\nnot Sumptuous(otha)\n\nforall x (Bounteous(x) -> Sumptuous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Lon is looted. Samuel is shinto. Carlotta is beardless. If someone is abreast then they are shinto. If someone is beardless then they are abreast. If Carlotta is not abreast then Carlotta is unmarred. Carlotta is unmarred.", "logic": "\nLooted(lon)\nShinto(samuel)\nBeardless(carlotta)\nforall x (Abreast(x) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Abreast(x))\nnot Abreast(carlotta) -> Unmarred(carlotta)\n\nUnmarred(carlotta)\n\nnot Abreast(carlotta) -> Unmarred(carlotta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Ashely is abstemious. Olivie is unaddicted. Gerri is pretty. If someone is frowsty then they are unaddicted. If someone is pretty then they are frowsty. If Gerri is not frowsty then Gerri is thyroidal. Ashely is not frowsty.", "logic": "\nAbstemious(ashely)\nUnaddicted(olivie)\nPretty(gerri)\nforall x (Frowsty(x) -> Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Frowsty(x))\nnot Frowsty(gerri) -> Thyroidal(gerri)\n\nnot Frowsty(ashely)\n\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Frowsty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Magnus is axillary. Olivier is coral. Kai is wooded. If someone is northerly then they are coral. If someone is wooded then they are northerly. If Kai is not northerly then Kai is cationic. Kai is big.", "logic": "\nAxillary(magnus)\nCoral(olivier)\nWooded(kai)\nforall x (Northerly(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) -> Northerly(x))\nnot Northerly(kai) -> Cationic(kai)\n\nBig(kai)\n\nBig(kai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Addis is restrained. Natty is bracted. Logan is siouan. If someone is exogenous then they are bracted. If someone is siouan then they are exogenous. If Logan is not exogenous then Logan is scentless. Natty is not scentless.", "logic": "\nRestrained(addis)\nBracted(natty)\nSiouan(logan)\nforall x (Exogenous(x) -> Bracted(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Exogenous(x))\nnot Exogenous(logan) -> Scentless(logan)\n\nnot Scentless(natty)\n\nnot Scentless(natty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Lorry is sweltry. Chester is unknowing. Jody is taxing. If someone is aflare then they are unknowing. If someone is taxing then they are aflare. If Jody is not aflare then Jody is bacterial. Lorry is big.", "logic": "\nSweltry(lorry)\nUnknowing(chester)\nTaxing(jody)\nforall x (Aflare(x) -> Unknowing(x))\nforall x (Taxing(x) -> Aflare(x))\nnot Aflare(jody) -> Bacterial(jody)\n\nBig(lorry)\n\nBig(lorry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "Audra is secretive. Audra is ubiquitous. Audra is operatic. Audra is troubling. Truman is secretive. Truman is ubiquitous. Truman is operatic. Truman is troubling. Truman is sterilized. Betsy is secretive. Betsy is ventilated. Betsy is operatic. Betsy is creditable. Betsy is troubling. Betsy is sterilized. Blue people are ventilated. If someone is troubling and creditable then they are operatic. Smart, ubiquitous people are creditable. If Truman is ventilated then Truman is creditable. If someone is ventilated then they are sterilized. If someone is ubiquitous then they are operatic. Betsy is troubling.", "logic": "\nSecretive(audra)\nUbiquitous(audra)\nOperatic(audra)\nTroubling(audra)\nSecretive(truman)\nUbiquitous(truman)\nOperatic(truman)\nTroubling(truman)\nSterilized(truman)\nSecretive(betsy)\nVentilated(betsy)\nOperatic(betsy)\nCreditable(betsy)\nTroubling(betsy)\nSterilized(betsy)\nforall x (Secretive(x) -> Ventilated(x))\nforall x (Troubling(x) and Creditable(x) -> Operatic(x))\nforall x (Troubling(x) and Ubiquitous(x) -> Creditable(x))\nVentilated(truman) -> Creditable(truman)\nforall x (Ventilated(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> Operatic(x))\n\nTroubling(betsy)\n\ntherefore Troubling(betsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Lorna is cauline. Lorna is pubertal. Lorna is aperient. Lorna is trabeate. Indira is cauline. Indira is pubertal. Indira is aperient. Indira is trabeate. Indira is daft. Kellen is cauline. Kellen is twopenny. Kellen is aperient. Kellen is dispirited. Kellen is trabeate. Kellen is daft. Blue people are twopenny. If someone is trabeate and dispirited then they are aperient. Smart, pubertal people are dispirited. If Indira is twopenny then Indira is dispirited. If someone is twopenny then they are daft. If someone is pubertal then they are aperient. Kellen is not cauline.", "logic": "\nCauline(lorna)\nPubertal(lorna)\nAperient(lorna)\nTrabeate(lorna)\nCauline(indira)\nPubertal(indira)\nAperient(indira)\nTrabeate(indira)\nDaft(indira)\nCauline(kellen)\nTwopenny(kellen)\nAperient(kellen)\nDispirited(kellen)\nTrabeate(kellen)\nDaft(kellen)\nforall x (Cauline(x) -> Twopenny(x))\nforall x (Trabeate(x) and Dispirited(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Trabeate(x) and Pubertal(x) -> Dispirited(x))\nTwopenny(indira) -> Dispirited(indira)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> Daft(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) -> Aperient(x))\n\nnot Cauline(kellen)\n\ntherefore Cauline(kellen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Reynold is felted. Reynold is farming. Reynold is angulate. Reynold is centesimal. Georg is felted. Georg is farming. Georg is angulate. Georg is centesimal. Georg is razorback. Mady is felted. Mady is attrited. Mady is angulate. Mady is afeared. Mady is centesimal. Mady is razorback. Blue people are attrited. If someone is centesimal and afeared then they are angulate. Smart, farming people are afeared. If Georg is attrited then Georg is afeared. If someone is attrited then they are razorback. If someone is farming then they are angulate. Georg is attrited.", "logic": "\nFelted(reynold)\nFarming(reynold)\nAngulate(reynold)\nCentesimal(reynold)\nFelted(georg)\nFarming(georg)\nAngulate(georg)\nCentesimal(georg)\nRazorback(georg)\nFelted(mady)\nAttrited(mady)\nAngulate(mady)\nAfeared(mady)\nCentesimal(mady)\nRazorback(mady)\nforall x (Felted(x) -> Attrited(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and Afeared(x) -> Angulate(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and Farming(x) -> Afeared(x))\nAttrited(georg) -> Afeared(georg)\nforall x (Attrited(x) -> Razorback(x))\nforall x (Farming(x) -> Angulate(x))\n\nAttrited(georg)\n\nFelted(georg) and forall x (Felted(x) -> Attrited(x)) -> therefore Attrited(georg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Ravi is palmy. Ravi is attended. Ravi is unawakened. Ravi is burnished. Fancie is palmy. Fancie is attended. Fancie is unawakened. Fancie is burnished. Fancie is phrenetic. Julie is palmy. Julie is shelfy. Julie is unawakened. Julie is gluttonous. Julie is burnished. Julie is phrenetic. Blue people are shelfy. If someone is burnished and gluttonous then they are unawakened. Smart, attended people are gluttonous. If Fancie is shelfy then Fancie is gluttonous. If someone is shelfy then they are phrenetic. If someone is attended then they are unawakened. Fancie is not shelfy.", "logic": "\nPalmy(ravi)\nAttended(ravi)\nUnawakened(ravi)\nBurnished(ravi)\nPalmy(fancie)\nAttended(fancie)\nUnawakened(fancie)\nBurnished(fancie)\nPhrenetic(fancie)\nPalmy(julie)\nShelfy(julie)\nUnawakened(julie)\nGluttonous(julie)\nBurnished(julie)\nPhrenetic(julie)\nforall x (Palmy(x) -> Shelfy(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and Gluttonous(x) -> Unawakened(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and Attended(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nShelfy(fancie) -> Gluttonous(fancie)\nforall x (Shelfy(x) -> Phrenetic(x))\nforall x (Attended(x) -> Unawakened(x))\n\nnot Shelfy(fancie)\n\nPalmy(fancie) and forall x (Palmy(x) -> Shelfy(x)) -> therefore Shelfy(fancie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Tess is mensurable. Tess is formosan. Tess is chief. Tess is civilian. Valry is mensurable. Valry is formosan. Valry is chief. Valry is civilian. Valry is laborious. Clarie is mensurable. Clarie is winless. Clarie is chief. Clarie is nimble. Clarie is civilian. Clarie is laborious. Blue people are winless. If someone is civilian and nimble then they are chief. Smart, formosan people are nimble. If Valry is winless then Valry is nimble. If someone is winless then they are laborious. If someone is formosan then they are chief. Tess is laborious.", "logic": "\nMensurable(tess)\nFormosan(tess)\nChief(tess)\nCivilian(tess)\nMensurable(valry)\nFormosan(valry)\nChief(valry)\nCivilian(valry)\nLaborious(valry)\nMensurable(clarie)\nWinless(clarie)\nChief(clarie)\nNimble(clarie)\nCivilian(clarie)\nLaborious(clarie)\nforall x (Mensurable(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) and Nimble(x) -> Chief(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) and Formosan(x) -> Nimble(x))\nWinless(valry) -> Nimble(valry)\nforall x (Winless(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Formosan(x) -> Chief(x))\n\nLaborious(tess)\n\nMensurable(tess) and forall x (Mensurable(x) -> Winless(x)) -> therefore Winless(tess) Winless(tess) and forall x (Winless(x) -> Laborious(x)) -> therefore Laborious(tess)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "Cristy is foggy. Cristy is unsinkable. Cristy is hortatory. Cristy is embonpoint. Mallorie is foggy. Mallorie is unsinkable. Mallorie is hortatory. Mallorie is embonpoint. Mallorie is biogenous. Tera is foggy. Tera is aging. Tera is hortatory. Tera is adrenergic. Tera is embonpoint. Tera is biogenous. Blue people are aging. If someone is embonpoint and adrenergic then they are hortatory. Smart, unsinkable people are adrenergic. If Mallorie is aging then Mallorie is adrenergic. If someone is aging then they are biogenous. If someone is unsinkable then they are hortatory. Cristy is not biogenous.", "logic": "\nFoggy(cristy)\nUnsinkable(cristy)\nHortatory(cristy)\nEmbonpoint(cristy)\nFoggy(mallorie)\nUnsinkable(mallorie)\nHortatory(mallorie)\nEmbonpoint(mallorie)\nBiogenous(mallorie)\nFoggy(tera)\nAging(tera)\nHortatory(tera)\nAdrenergic(tera)\nEmbonpoint(tera)\nBiogenous(tera)\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) and Adrenergic(x) -> Hortatory(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) and Unsinkable(x) -> Adrenergic(x))\nAging(mallorie) -> Adrenergic(mallorie)\nforall x (Aging(x) -> Biogenous(x))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Hortatory(x))\n\nnot Biogenous(cristy)\n\nFoggy(cristy) and forall x (Foggy(x) -> Aging(x)) -> therefore Aging(cristy) Aging(cristy) and forall x (Aging(x) -> Biogenous(x)) -> therefore Biogenous(cristy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-342"} {"premises": "The cody hemstitch the cyndy. The cody is pitted. The cody is primary. The cody is recessive. The cody is gibelike. The cody bless the piper. The cody bless the cyndy. The cody clump the piper. The piper hemstitch the cyndy. The piper is libellous. The piper bless the cyndy. The cyndy hemstitch the piper. The cyndy is recessive. The cyndy is gibelike. The cyndy bless the piper. The cyndy clump the piper. All primary things are pitted. If the cyndy does not see the piper then the cyndy is not gibelike. If something bless the cody then the cody is not libellous. If something is recessive and it hemstitch the cyndy then it is primary. If something hemstitch the cyndy then it is recessive. If something hemstitch the cyndy and the cyndy is not recessive then it is libellous. The cyndy is recessive.", "logic": "\nHemstitch(cody, cyndy)\nPitted(cody)\nPrimary(cody)\nRecessive(cody)\nGibelike(cody)\nBless(cody, piper)\nBless(cody, cyndy)\nClump(cody, piper)\nHemstitch(piper, cyndy)\nLibellous(piper)\nBless(piper, cyndy)\nHemstitch(cyndy, piper)\nRecessive(cyndy)\nGibelike(cyndy)\nBless(cyndy, piper)\nClump(cyndy, piper)\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Pitted(x))\nnot Bless(cyndy, piper) -> not Gibelike(cyndy)\nforall x (Bless(x, cody) -> not Libellous(cody))\nforall x (Recessive(x) and Hemstitch(x, cyndy) -> Primary(x))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, cyndy) -> Recessive(x))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, cyndy) and not Recessive(cyndy) -> Libellous(x))\n\nRecessive(cyndy)\n\ntherefore Recessive(cyndy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The rosario synthesize the riannon. The rosario is chasidic. The rosario is lobated. The rosario is cumulative. The rosario is edentate. The rosario best the maura. The rosario best the riannon. The rosario yawp the maura. The maura synthesize the riannon. The maura is overbold. The maura best the riannon. The riannon synthesize the maura. The riannon is cumulative. The riannon is edentate. The riannon best the maura. The riannon yawp the maura. All lobated things are chasidic. If the riannon does not see the maura then the riannon is not edentate. If something best the rosario then the rosario is not overbold. If something is cumulative and it synthesize the riannon then it is lobated. If something synthesize the riannon then it is cumulative. If something synthesize the riannon and the riannon is not cumulative then it is overbold. The rosario is not edentate.", "logic": "\nSynthesize(rosario, riannon)\nChasidic(rosario)\nLobated(rosario)\nCumulative(rosario)\nEdentate(rosario)\nBest(rosario, maura)\nBest(rosario, riannon)\nYawp(rosario, maura)\nSynthesize(maura, riannon)\nOverbold(maura)\nBest(maura, riannon)\nSynthesize(riannon, maura)\nCumulative(riannon)\nEdentate(riannon)\nBest(riannon, maura)\nYawp(riannon, maura)\nforall x (Lobated(x) -> Chasidic(x))\nnot Best(riannon, maura) -> not Edentate(riannon)\nforall x (Best(x, rosario) -> not Overbold(rosario))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) and Synthesize(x, riannon) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, riannon) -> Cumulative(x))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, riannon) and not Cumulative(riannon) -> Overbold(x))\n\nnot Edentate(rosario)\n\ntherefore Edentate(rosario)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The maurice pummel the melisande. The maurice is nocent. The maurice is graduated. The maurice is frantic. The maurice is isosmotic. The maurice mythicise the leiah. The maurice mythicise the melisande. The maurice stun the leiah. The leiah pummel the melisande. The leiah is latin. The leiah mythicise the melisande. The melisande pummel the leiah. The melisande is frantic. The melisande is isosmotic. The melisande mythicise the leiah. The melisande stun the leiah. All graduated things are nocent. If the melisande does not see the leiah then the melisande is not isosmotic. If something mythicise the maurice then the maurice is not latin. If something is frantic and it pummel the melisande then it is graduated. If something pummel the melisande then it is frantic. If something pummel the melisande and the melisande is not frantic then it is latin. The leiah is frantic.", "logic": "\nPummel(maurice, melisande)\nNocent(maurice)\nGraduated(maurice)\nFrantic(maurice)\nIsosmotic(maurice)\nMythicise(maurice, leiah)\nMythicise(maurice, melisande)\nStun(maurice, leiah)\nPummel(leiah, melisande)\nLatin(leiah)\nMythicise(leiah, melisande)\nPummel(melisande, leiah)\nFrantic(melisande)\nIsosmotic(melisande)\nMythicise(melisande, leiah)\nStun(melisande, leiah)\nforall x (Graduated(x) -> Nocent(x))\nnot Mythicise(melisande, leiah) -> not Isosmotic(melisande)\nforall x (Mythicise(x, maurice) -> not Latin(maurice))\nforall x (Frantic(x) and Pummel(x, melisande) -> Graduated(x))\nforall x (Pummel(x, melisande) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Pummel(x, melisande) and not Frantic(melisande) -> Latin(x))\n\nFrantic(leiah)\n\nPummel(leiah, melisande) and forall x (Pummel(x, melisande) -> Frantic(x)) -> therefore Frantic(leiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The jacinthe cushion the ashly. The jacinthe is ultrasonic. The jacinthe is avellan. The jacinthe is incarnate. The jacinthe is marked. The jacinthe houseclean the renata. The jacinthe houseclean the ashly. The jacinthe cocoon the renata. The renata cushion the ashly. The renata is tenderized. The renata houseclean the ashly. The ashly cushion the renata. The ashly is incarnate. The ashly is marked. The ashly houseclean the renata. The ashly cocoon the renata. All avellan things are ultrasonic. If the ashly does not see the renata then the ashly is not marked. If something houseclean the jacinthe then the jacinthe is not tenderized. If something is incarnate and it cushion the ashly then it is avellan. If something cushion the ashly then it is incarnate. If something cushion the ashly and the ashly is not incarnate then it is tenderized. The renata is not incarnate.", "logic": "\nCushion(jacinthe, ashly)\nUltrasonic(jacinthe)\nAvellan(jacinthe)\nIncarnate(jacinthe)\nMarked(jacinthe)\nHouseclean(jacinthe, renata)\nHouseclean(jacinthe, ashly)\nCocoon(jacinthe, renata)\nCushion(renata, ashly)\nTenderized(renata)\nHouseclean(renata, ashly)\nCushion(ashly, renata)\nIncarnate(ashly)\nMarked(ashly)\nHouseclean(ashly, renata)\nCocoon(ashly, renata)\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\nnot Houseclean(ashly, renata) -> not Marked(ashly)\nforall x (Houseclean(x, jacinthe) -> not Tenderized(jacinthe))\nforall x (Incarnate(x) and Cushion(x, ashly) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Cushion(x, ashly) -> Incarnate(x))\nforall x (Cushion(x, ashly) and not Incarnate(ashly) -> Tenderized(x))\n\nnot Incarnate(renata)\n\nCushion(renata, ashly) and forall x (Cushion(x, ashly) -> Incarnate(x)) -> therefore Incarnate(renata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The shaylynn aerify the aubert. The shaylynn is protruding. The shaylynn is despotic. The shaylynn is fabulous. The shaylynn is craggy. The shaylynn crimson the marla. The shaylynn crimson the aubert. The shaylynn nest the marla. The marla aerify the aubert. The marla is pomaded. The marla crimson the aubert. The aubert aerify the marla. The aubert is fabulous. The aubert is craggy. The aubert crimson the marla. The aubert nest the marla. All despotic things are protruding. If the aubert does not see the marla then the aubert is not craggy. If something crimson the shaylynn then the shaylynn is not pomaded. If something is fabulous and it aerify the aubert then it is despotic. If something aerify the aubert then it is fabulous. If something aerify the aubert and the aubert is not fabulous then it is pomaded. The marla is despotic.", "logic": "\nAerify(shaylynn, aubert)\nProtruding(shaylynn)\nDespotic(shaylynn)\nFabulous(shaylynn)\nCraggy(shaylynn)\nCrimson(shaylynn, marla)\nCrimson(shaylynn, aubert)\nNest(shaylynn, marla)\nAerify(marla, aubert)\nPomaded(marla)\nCrimson(marla, aubert)\nAerify(aubert, marla)\nFabulous(aubert)\nCraggy(aubert)\nCrimson(aubert, marla)\nNest(aubert, marla)\nforall x (Despotic(x) -> Protruding(x))\nnot Crimson(aubert, marla) -> not Craggy(aubert)\nforall x (Crimson(x, shaylynn) -> not Pomaded(shaylynn))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and Aerify(x, aubert) -> Despotic(x))\nforall x (Aerify(x, aubert) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Aerify(x, aubert) and not Fabulous(aubert) -> Pomaded(x))\n\nDespotic(marla)\n\nAerify(marla, aubert) and forall x (Aerify(x, aubert) -> Fabulous(x)) -> therefore Fabulous(marla) Fabulous(marla) and Aerify(marla, aubert) and forall x (Fabulous(x) and Aerify(x, aubert) -> Despotic(x)) -> therefore Despotic(marla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The vonni aestivate the thom. The vonni is historied. The vonni is particular. The vonni is enclosed. The vonni is unlovely. The vonni analyze the sydelle. The vonni analyze the thom. The vonni treat the sydelle. The sydelle aestivate the thom. The sydelle is odorless. The sydelle analyze the thom. The thom aestivate the sydelle. The thom is enclosed. The thom is unlovely. The thom analyze the sydelle. The thom treat the sydelle. All particular things are historied. If the thom does not see the sydelle then the thom is not unlovely. If something analyze the vonni then the vonni is not odorless. If something is enclosed and it aestivate the thom then it is particular. If something aestivate the thom then it is enclosed. If something aestivate the thom and the thom is not enclosed then it is odorless. The sydelle is not particular.", "logic": "\nAestivate(vonni, thom)\nHistoried(vonni)\nParticular(vonni)\nEnclosed(vonni)\nUnlovely(vonni)\nAnalyze(vonni, sydelle)\nAnalyze(vonni, thom)\nTreat(vonni, sydelle)\nAestivate(sydelle, thom)\nOdorless(sydelle)\nAnalyze(sydelle, thom)\nAestivate(thom, sydelle)\nEnclosed(thom)\nUnlovely(thom)\nAnalyze(thom, sydelle)\nTreat(thom, sydelle)\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Historied(x))\nnot Analyze(thom, sydelle) -> not Unlovely(thom)\nforall x (Analyze(x, vonni) -> not Odorless(vonni))\nforall x (Enclosed(x) and Aestivate(x, thom) -> Particular(x))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, thom) -> Enclosed(x))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, thom) and not Enclosed(thom) -> Odorless(x))\n\nnot Particular(sydelle)\n\nAestivate(sydelle, thom) and forall x (Aestivate(x, thom) -> Enclosed(x)) -> therefore Enclosed(sydelle) Enclosed(sydelle) and Aestivate(sydelle, thom) and forall x (Enclosed(x) and Aestivate(x, thom) -> Particular(x)) -> therefore Particular(sydelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The wanda love the laverne. The wanda is strategic. The wanda is polygonal. The wanda is undeclared. The wanda is deathly. The wanda crimson the susann. The wanda crimson the laverne. The wanda impregnate the susann. The susann love the laverne. The susann is hemostatic. The susann crimson the laverne. The laverne love the susann. The laverne is undeclared. The laverne is deathly. The laverne crimson the susann. The laverne impregnate the susann. All polygonal things are strategic. If the laverne does not see the susann then the laverne is not deathly. If something crimson the wanda then the wanda is not hemostatic. If something is undeclared and it love the laverne then it is polygonal. If something love the laverne then it is undeclared. If something love the laverne and the laverne is not undeclared then it is hemostatic. The laverne is not strategic.", "logic": "\nLove(wanda, laverne)\nStrategic(wanda)\nPolygonal(wanda)\nUndeclared(wanda)\nDeathly(wanda)\nCrimson(wanda, susann)\nCrimson(wanda, laverne)\nImpregnate(wanda, susann)\nLove(susann, laverne)\nHemostatic(susann)\nCrimson(susann, laverne)\nLove(laverne, susann)\nUndeclared(laverne)\nDeathly(laverne)\nCrimson(laverne, susann)\nImpregnate(laverne, susann)\nforall x (Polygonal(x) -> Strategic(x))\nnot Crimson(laverne, susann) -> not Deathly(laverne)\nforall x (Crimson(x, wanda) -> not Hemostatic(wanda))\nforall x (Undeclared(x) and Love(x, laverne) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Love(x, laverne) -> Undeclared(x))\nforall x (Love(x, laverne) and not Undeclared(laverne) -> Hemostatic(x))\n\nnot Strategic(laverne)\n\nforall x (Polygonal(x) -> Strategic(x)) <- forall x (Undeclared(x) and Love(x, laverne) -> Polygonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The karlie nitpick the gustavus. The karlie is edged. The karlie is cauline. The karlie is dateless. The karlie is scurrying. The karlie sequence the keene. The karlie sequence the gustavus. The karlie diagnose the keene. The keene nitpick the gustavus. The keene is perfect. The keene sequence the gustavus. The gustavus nitpick the keene. The gustavus is dateless. The gustavus is scurrying. The gustavus sequence the keene. The gustavus diagnose the keene. All cauline things are edged. If the gustavus does not see the keene then the gustavus is not scurrying. If something sequence the karlie then the karlie is not perfect. If something is dateless and it nitpick the gustavus then it is cauline. If something nitpick the gustavus then it is dateless. If something nitpick the gustavus and the gustavus is not dateless then it is perfect. The karlie is perfect.", "logic": "\nNitpick(karlie, gustavus)\nEdged(karlie)\nCauline(karlie)\nDateless(karlie)\nScurrying(karlie)\nSequence(karlie, keene)\nSequence(karlie, gustavus)\nDiagnose(karlie, keene)\nNitpick(keene, gustavus)\nPerfect(keene)\nSequence(keene, gustavus)\nNitpick(gustavus, keene)\nDateless(gustavus)\nScurrying(gustavus)\nSequence(gustavus, keene)\nDiagnose(gustavus, keene)\nforall x (Cauline(x) -> Edged(x))\nnot Sequence(gustavus, keene) -> not Scurrying(gustavus)\nforall x (Sequence(x, karlie) -> not Perfect(karlie))\nforall x (Dateless(x) and Nitpick(x, gustavus) -> Cauline(x))\nforall x (Nitpick(x, gustavus) -> Dateless(x))\nforall x (Nitpick(x, gustavus) and not Dateless(gustavus) -> Perfect(x))\n\nPerfect(karlie)\n\nforall x (Nitpick(x, gustavus) and not Dateless(gustavus) -> Perfect(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The merrile unhinge the helyn. The merrile is acetous. The merrile is irenic. The merrile is totaled. The merrile is dogged. The merrile gnaw the darien. The merrile gnaw the helyn. The merrile coarsen the darien. The darien unhinge the helyn. The darien is briary. The darien gnaw the helyn. The helyn unhinge the darien. The helyn is totaled. The helyn is dogged. The helyn gnaw the darien. The helyn coarsen the darien. All irenic things are acetous. If the helyn does not see the darien then the helyn is not dogged. If something gnaw the merrile then the merrile is not briary. If something is totaled and it unhinge the helyn then it is irenic. If something unhinge the helyn then it is totaled. If something unhinge the helyn and the helyn is not totaled then it is briary. The helyn is not briary.", "logic": "\nUnhinge(merrile, helyn)\nAcetous(merrile)\nIrenic(merrile)\nTotaled(merrile)\nDogged(merrile)\nGnaw(merrile, darien)\nGnaw(merrile, helyn)\nCoarsen(merrile, darien)\nUnhinge(darien, helyn)\nBriary(darien)\nGnaw(darien, helyn)\nUnhinge(helyn, darien)\nTotaled(helyn)\nDogged(helyn)\nGnaw(helyn, darien)\nCoarsen(helyn, darien)\nforall x (Irenic(x) -> Acetous(x))\nnot Gnaw(helyn, darien) -> not Dogged(helyn)\nforall x (Gnaw(x, merrile) -> not Briary(merrile))\nforall x (Totaled(x) and Unhinge(x, helyn) -> Irenic(x))\nforall x (Unhinge(x, helyn) -> Totaled(x))\nforall x (Unhinge(x, helyn) and not Totaled(helyn) -> Briary(x))\n\nnot Briary(helyn)\n\nforall x (Unhinge(x, helyn) and not Totaled(helyn) -> Briary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The jodee reorganise the genevieve. The jodee is majuscule. The jodee is tearful. The jodee is prandial. The jodee is manly. The jodee callous the madelon. The jodee callous the genevieve. The jodee prepay the madelon. The madelon reorganise the genevieve. The madelon is comparable. The madelon callous the genevieve. The genevieve reorganise the madelon. The genevieve is prandial. The genevieve is manly. The genevieve callous the madelon. The genevieve prepay the madelon. All tearful things are majuscule. If the genevieve does not see the madelon then the genevieve is not manly. If something callous the jodee then the jodee is not comparable. If something is prandial and it reorganise the genevieve then it is tearful. If something reorganise the genevieve then it is prandial. If something reorganise the genevieve and the genevieve is not prandial then it is comparable. The madelon prepay the madelon.", "logic": "\nReorganise(jodee, genevieve)\nMajuscule(jodee)\nTearful(jodee)\nPrandial(jodee)\nManly(jodee)\nCallous(jodee, madelon)\nCallous(jodee, genevieve)\nPrepay(jodee, madelon)\nReorganise(madelon, genevieve)\nComparable(madelon)\nCallous(madelon, genevieve)\nReorganise(genevieve, madelon)\nPrandial(genevieve)\nManly(genevieve)\nCallous(genevieve, madelon)\nPrepay(genevieve, madelon)\nforall x (Tearful(x) -> Majuscule(x))\nnot Callous(genevieve, madelon) -> not Manly(genevieve)\nforall x (Callous(x, jodee) -> not Comparable(jodee))\nforall x (Prandial(x) and Reorganise(x, genevieve) -> Tearful(x))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, genevieve) -> Prandial(x))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, genevieve) and not Prandial(genevieve) -> Comparable(x))\n\nPrepay(madelon, madelon)\n\nPrepay(madelon, madelon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The hester vent the sergent. The hester is unblinking. The hester is divalent. The hester is merited. The hester is enigmatic. The hester boggle the phoebe. The hester boggle the sergent. The hester mismatch the phoebe. The phoebe vent the sergent. The phoebe is quenchless. The phoebe boggle the sergent. The sergent vent the phoebe. The sergent is merited. The sergent is enigmatic. The sergent boggle the phoebe. The sergent mismatch the phoebe. All divalent things are unblinking. If the sergent does not see the phoebe then the sergent is not enigmatic. If something boggle the hester then the hester is not quenchless. If something is merited and it vent the sergent then it is divalent. If something vent the sergent then it is merited. If something vent the sergent and the sergent is not merited then it is quenchless. The phoebe is not enigmatic.", "logic": "\nVent(hester, sergent)\nUnblinking(hester)\nDivalent(hester)\nMerited(hester)\nEnigmatic(hester)\nBoggle(hester, phoebe)\nBoggle(hester, sergent)\nMismatch(hester, phoebe)\nVent(phoebe, sergent)\nQuenchless(phoebe)\nBoggle(phoebe, sergent)\nVent(sergent, phoebe)\nMerited(sergent)\nEnigmatic(sergent)\nBoggle(sergent, phoebe)\nMismatch(sergent, phoebe)\nforall x (Divalent(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nnot Boggle(sergent, phoebe) -> not Enigmatic(sergent)\nforall x (Boggle(x, hester) -> not Quenchless(hester))\nforall x (Merited(x) and Vent(x, sergent) -> Divalent(x))\nforall x (Vent(x, sergent) -> Merited(x))\nforall x (Vent(x, sergent) and not Merited(sergent) -> Quenchless(x))\n\nnot Enigmatic(phoebe)\n\nnot Enigmatic(phoebe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The barby package the dynah. The barby is dionysian. The barby is despicable. The barby is pyrectic. The barby is bidentate. The barby alkalinise the anais. The barby alkalinise the dynah. The barby handcolour the anais. The anais package the dynah. The anais is unwell. The anais alkalinise the dynah. The dynah package the anais. The dynah is pyrectic. The dynah is bidentate. The dynah alkalinise the anais. The dynah handcolour the anais. All despicable things are dionysian. If the dynah does not see the anais then the dynah is not bidentate. If something alkalinise the barby then the barby is not unwell. If something is pyrectic and it package the dynah then it is despicable. If something package the dynah then it is pyrectic. If something package the dynah and the dynah is not pyrectic then it is unwell. The anais alkalinise the barby.", "logic": "\nPackage(barby, dynah)\nDionysian(barby)\nDespicable(barby)\nPyrectic(barby)\nBidentate(barby)\nAlkalinise(barby, anais)\nAlkalinise(barby, dynah)\nHandcolour(barby, anais)\nPackage(anais, dynah)\nUnwell(anais)\nAlkalinise(anais, dynah)\nPackage(dynah, anais)\nPyrectic(dynah)\nBidentate(dynah)\nAlkalinise(dynah, anais)\nHandcolour(dynah, anais)\nforall x (Despicable(x) -> Dionysian(x))\nnot Alkalinise(dynah, anais) -> not Bidentate(dynah)\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, barby) -> not Unwell(barby))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) and Package(x, dynah) -> Despicable(x))\nforall x (Package(x, dynah) -> Pyrectic(x))\nforall x (Package(x, dynah) and not Pyrectic(dynah) -> Unwell(x))\n\nAlkalinise(anais, barby)\n\nAlkalinise(anais, barby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1771"} {"premises": "The victor is not illative. The victor is seedy. The victor demystify the amelina. The victor reshuffle the amelina. The amelina is triassic. The amelina is seedy. The amelina is raring. The amelina demystify the victor. The amelina reshuffle the victor. The amelina totalize the victor. If someone totalize the amelina and the amelina reshuffle the victor then the victor is bunchy. If someone totalize the victor and the victor reshuffle the amelina then the victor totalize the amelina. The victor is not illative.", "logic": "\nnot Illative(victor)\nSeedy(victor)\nDemystify(victor, amelina)\nReshuffle(victor, amelina)\nTriassic(amelina)\nSeedy(amelina)\nRaring(amelina)\nDemystify(amelina, victor)\nReshuffle(amelina, victor)\nTotalize(amelina, victor)\nforall x (Totalize(x, amelina) and Reshuffle(amelina, victor) -> Bunchy(victor))\nforall x (Totalize(x, victor) and Reshuffle(victor, amelina) -> Totalize(victor, amelina))\n\nnot Illative(victor)\n\ntherefore not Illative(victor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The suellen is not callable. The suellen is slowgoing. The suellen forfend the cyrill. The suellen boom the cyrill. The cyrill is interwoven. The cyrill is slowgoing. The cyrill is neuter. The cyrill forfend the suellen. The cyrill boom the suellen. The cyrill purr the suellen. If someone purr the cyrill and the cyrill boom the suellen then the suellen is uncivil. If someone purr the suellen and the suellen boom the cyrill then the suellen purr the cyrill. The suellen is not slowgoing.", "logic": "\nnot Callable(suellen)\nSlowgoing(suellen)\nForfend(suellen, cyrill)\nBoom(suellen, cyrill)\nInterwoven(cyrill)\nSlowgoing(cyrill)\nNeuter(cyrill)\nForfend(cyrill, suellen)\nBoom(cyrill, suellen)\nPurr(cyrill, suellen)\nforall x (Purr(x, cyrill) and Boom(cyrill, suellen) -> Uncivil(suellen))\nforall x (Purr(x, suellen) and Boom(suellen, cyrill) -> Purr(suellen, cyrill))\n\nnot Slowgoing(suellen)\n\ntherefore Slowgoing(suellen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The nicolle is not mute. The nicolle is zany. The nicolle delight the austen. The nicolle flop the austen. The austen is devout. The austen is zany. The austen is indistinct. The austen delight the nicolle. The austen flop the nicolle. The austen whitewash the nicolle. If someone whitewash the austen and the austen flop the nicolle then the nicolle is unmatched. If someone whitewash the nicolle and the nicolle flop the austen then the nicolle whitewash the austen. The nicolle whitewash the austen.", "logic": "\nnot Mute(nicolle)\nZany(nicolle)\nDelight(nicolle, austen)\nFlop(nicolle, austen)\nDevout(austen)\nZany(austen)\nIndistinct(austen)\nDelight(austen, nicolle)\nFlop(austen, nicolle)\nWhitewash(austen, nicolle)\nforall x (Whitewash(x, austen) and Flop(austen, nicolle) -> Unmatched(nicolle))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, nicolle) and Flop(nicolle, austen) -> Whitewash(nicolle, austen))\n\nWhitewash(nicolle, austen)\n\nWhitewash(austen, nicolle) and Flop(nicolle, austen) and forall x (Whitewash(x, nicolle) and Flop(nicolle, austen) -> Whitewash(nicolle, austen)) -> therefore Whitewash(nicolle, austen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The rainer is not unrefined. The rainer is unaware. The rainer grass the aharon. The rainer tantalise the aharon. The aharon is tiddly. The aharon is unaware. The aharon is cuneiform. The aharon grass the rainer. The aharon tantalise the rainer. The aharon unbrace the rainer. If someone unbrace the aharon and the aharon tantalise the rainer then the rainer is unwounded. If someone unbrace the rainer and the rainer tantalise the aharon then the rainer unbrace the aharon. The rainer does not visit the aharon.", "logic": "\nnot Unrefined(rainer)\nUnaware(rainer)\nGrass(rainer, aharon)\nTantalise(rainer, aharon)\nTiddly(aharon)\nUnaware(aharon)\nCuneiform(aharon)\nGrass(aharon, rainer)\nTantalise(aharon, rainer)\nUnbrace(aharon, rainer)\nforall x (Unbrace(x, aharon) and Tantalise(aharon, rainer) -> Unwounded(rainer))\nforall x (Unbrace(x, rainer) and Tantalise(rainer, aharon) -> Unbrace(rainer, aharon))\n\nnot Unbrace(rainer, aharon)\n\nUnbrace(aharon, rainer) and Tantalise(rainer, aharon) and forall x (Unbrace(x, rainer) and Tantalise(rainer, aharon) -> Unbrace(rainer, aharon)) -> therefore Unbrace(rainer, aharon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The jessi is not diabetic. The jessi is kechuan. The jessi corrugate the vassili. The jessi tunnel the vassili. The vassili is statuary. The vassili is kechuan. The vassili is grassroots. The vassili corrugate the jessi. The vassili tunnel the jessi. The vassili retread the jessi. If someone retread the vassili and the vassili tunnel the jessi then the jessi is layered. If someone retread the jessi and the jessi tunnel the vassili then the jessi retread the vassili. The jessi is layered.", "logic": "\nnot Diabetic(jessi)\nKechuan(jessi)\nCorrugate(jessi, vassili)\nTunnel(jessi, vassili)\nStatuary(vassili)\nKechuan(vassili)\nGrassroots(vassili)\nCorrugate(vassili, jessi)\nTunnel(vassili, jessi)\nRetread(vassili, jessi)\nforall x (Retread(x, vassili) and Tunnel(vassili, jessi) -> Layered(jessi))\nforall x (Retread(x, jessi) and Tunnel(jessi, vassili) -> Retread(jessi, vassili))\n\nLayered(jessi)\n\nRetread(vassili, jessi) and Tunnel(jessi, vassili) and forall x (Retread(x, jessi) and Tunnel(jessi, vassili) -> Retread(jessi, vassili)) -> therefore Retread(jessi, vassili) Retread(jessi, vassili) and Tunnel(vassili, jessi) and forall x (Retread(x, vassili) and Tunnel(vassili, jessi) -> Layered(jessi)) -> therefore Layered(jessi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The luisa is not viviparous. The luisa is leering. The luisa whistle the aeriell. The luisa luxuriate the aeriell. The aeriell is unbecoming. The aeriell is leering. The aeriell is unmannered. The aeriell whistle the luisa. The aeriell luxuriate the luisa. The aeriell vaporize the luisa. If someone vaporize the aeriell and the aeriell luxuriate the luisa then the luisa is despiteful. If someone vaporize the luisa and the luisa luxuriate the aeriell then the luisa vaporize the aeriell. The luisa is not despiteful.", "logic": "\nnot Viviparous(luisa)\nLeering(luisa)\nWhistle(luisa, aeriell)\nLuxuriate(luisa, aeriell)\nUnbecoming(aeriell)\nLeering(aeriell)\nUnmannered(aeriell)\nWhistle(aeriell, luisa)\nLuxuriate(aeriell, luisa)\nVaporize(aeriell, luisa)\nforall x (Vaporize(x, aeriell) and Luxuriate(aeriell, luisa) -> Despiteful(luisa))\nforall x (Vaporize(x, luisa) and Luxuriate(luisa, aeriell) -> Vaporize(luisa, aeriell))\n\nnot Despiteful(luisa)\n\nVaporize(aeriell, luisa) and Luxuriate(luisa, aeriell) and forall x (Vaporize(x, luisa) and Luxuriate(luisa, aeriell) -> Vaporize(luisa, aeriell)) -> therefore Vaporize(luisa, aeriell) Vaporize(luisa, aeriell) and Luxuriate(aeriell, luisa) and forall x (Vaporize(x, aeriell) and Luxuriate(aeriell, luisa) -> Despiteful(luisa)) -> therefore Despiteful(luisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The karina is not evasive. The karina is scarce. The karina hopple the horacio. The karina emaciate the horacio. The horacio is unjust. The horacio is scarce. The horacio is upland. The horacio hopple the karina. The horacio emaciate the karina. The horacio rummage the karina. If someone rummage the horacio and the horacio emaciate the karina then the karina is causeless. If someone rummage the karina and the karina emaciate the horacio then the karina rummage the horacio. The horacio does not visit the horacio.", "logic": "\nnot Evasive(karina)\nScarce(karina)\nHopple(karina, horacio)\nEmaciate(karina, horacio)\nUnjust(horacio)\nScarce(horacio)\nUpland(horacio)\nHopple(horacio, karina)\nEmaciate(horacio, karina)\nRummage(horacio, karina)\nforall x (Rummage(x, horacio) and Emaciate(horacio, karina) -> Causeless(karina))\nforall x (Rummage(x, karina) and Emaciate(karina, horacio) -> Rummage(karina, horacio))\n\nnot Rummage(horacio, horacio)\n\nnot Rummage(horacio, horacio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The sharia is not scholarly. The sharia is fluky. The sharia attaint the havivah. The sharia claver the havivah. The havivah is axiomatic. The havivah is fluky. The havivah is rubicund. The havivah attaint the sharia. The havivah claver the sharia. The havivah cense the sharia. If someone cense the havivah and the havivah claver the sharia then the sharia is associable. If someone cense the sharia and the sharia claver the havivah then the sharia cense the havivah. The havivah attaint the havivah.", "logic": "\nnot Scholarly(sharia)\nFluky(sharia)\nAttaint(sharia, havivah)\nClaver(sharia, havivah)\nAxiomatic(havivah)\nFluky(havivah)\nRubicund(havivah)\nAttaint(havivah, sharia)\nClaver(havivah, sharia)\nCense(havivah, sharia)\nforall x (Cense(x, havivah) and Claver(havivah, sharia) -> Associable(sharia))\nforall x (Cense(x, sharia) and Claver(sharia, havivah) -> Cense(sharia, havivah))\n\nAttaint(havivah, havivah)\n\nAttaint(havivah, havivah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The staford is not loath. The staford is bendable. The staford interest the conroy. The staford confide the conroy. The conroy is apodous. The conroy is bendable. The conroy is belarusian. The conroy interest the staford. The conroy confide the staford. The conroy fricassee the staford. If someone fricassee the conroy and the conroy confide the staford then the staford is nitric. If someone fricassee the staford and the staford confide the conroy then the staford fricassee the conroy. The conroy does not see the conroy.", "logic": "\nnot Loath(staford)\nBendable(staford)\nInterest(staford, conroy)\nConfide(staford, conroy)\nApodous(conroy)\nBendable(conroy)\nBelarusian(conroy)\nInterest(conroy, staford)\nConfide(conroy, staford)\nFricassee(conroy, staford)\nforall x (Fricassee(x, conroy) and Confide(conroy, staford) -> Nitric(staford))\nforall x (Fricassee(x, staford) and Confide(staford, conroy) -> Fricassee(staford, conroy))\n\nnot Confide(conroy, conroy)\n\nnot Confide(conroy, conroy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The noreen is not postwar. The noreen is boric. The noreen quash the nanny. The noreen quiet the nanny. The nanny is antennal. The nanny is boric. The nanny is yawning. The nanny quash the noreen. The nanny quiet the noreen. The nanny utilise the noreen. If someone utilise the nanny and the nanny quiet the noreen then the noreen is telling. If someone utilise the noreen and the noreen quiet the nanny then the noreen utilise the nanny. The noreen is antennal.", "logic": "\nnot Postwar(noreen)\nBoric(noreen)\nQuash(noreen, nanny)\nQuiet(noreen, nanny)\nAntennal(nanny)\nBoric(nanny)\nYawning(nanny)\nQuash(nanny, noreen)\nQuiet(nanny, noreen)\nUtilise(nanny, noreen)\nforall x (Utilise(x, nanny) and Quiet(nanny, noreen) -> Telling(noreen))\nforall x (Utilise(x, noreen) and Quiet(noreen, nanny) -> Utilise(noreen, nanny))\n\nAntennal(noreen)\n\nAntennal(noreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The cathie is not reclusive. The cathie is bolivian. The cathie resurface the betsy. The cathie salaam the betsy. The betsy is murmuring. The betsy is bolivian. The betsy is explicit. The betsy resurface the cathie. The betsy salaam the cathie. The betsy homologise the cathie. If someone homologise the betsy and the betsy salaam the cathie then the cathie is isotonic. If someone homologise the cathie and the cathie salaam the betsy then the cathie homologise the betsy. The cathie does not need the cathie.", "logic": "\nnot Reclusive(cathie)\nBolivian(cathie)\nResurface(cathie, betsy)\nSalaam(cathie, betsy)\nMurmuring(betsy)\nBolivian(betsy)\nExplicit(betsy)\nResurface(betsy, cathie)\nSalaam(betsy, cathie)\nHomologise(betsy, cathie)\nforall x (Homologise(x, betsy) and Salaam(betsy, cathie) -> Isotonic(cathie))\nforall x (Homologise(x, cathie) and Salaam(cathie, betsy) -> Homologise(cathie, betsy))\n\nnot Resurface(cathie, cathie)\n\nnot Resurface(cathie, cathie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The jerrilee is not sevenfold. The jerrilee is damning. The jerrilee scandalise the andrei. The jerrilee misplace the andrei. The andrei is accordant. The andrei is damning. The andrei is tricuspid. The andrei scandalise the jerrilee. The andrei misplace the jerrilee. The andrei abash the jerrilee. If someone abash the andrei and the andrei misplace the jerrilee then the jerrilee is disastrous. If someone abash the jerrilee and the jerrilee misplace the andrei then the jerrilee abash the andrei. The andrei is sevenfold.", "logic": "\nnot Sevenfold(jerrilee)\nDamning(jerrilee)\nScandalise(jerrilee, andrei)\nMisplace(jerrilee, andrei)\nAccordant(andrei)\nDamning(andrei)\nTricuspid(andrei)\nScandalise(andrei, jerrilee)\nMisplace(andrei, jerrilee)\nAbash(andrei, jerrilee)\nforall x (Abash(x, andrei) and Misplace(andrei, jerrilee) -> Disastrous(jerrilee))\nforall x (Abash(x, jerrilee) and Misplace(jerrilee, andrei) -> Abash(jerrilee, andrei))\n\nSevenfold(andrei)\n\nSevenfold(andrei) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-574"} {"premises": "The gabrila is beat. The iormina profiteer the gabrila. The patience is recurring. The linnie jubilate the iormina. If someone jubilate the iormina then they are recurring. If someone agitate the gabrila then the gabrila jubilate the iormina. If the iormina agitate the linnie and the linnie is buff then the linnie profiteer the gabrila. If someone jubilate the patience then they eat the gabrila. If someone jubilate the linnie then they see the iormina. If someone is recurring then they see the linnie. If someone is assigned and they see the linnie then the linnie profiteer the iormina. If someone is recurring then they chase the patience. The linnie jubilate the iormina.", "logic": "\nBeat(gabrila)\nProfiteer(iormina, gabrila)\nRecurring(patience)\nJubilate(linnie, iormina)\nforall x (Jubilate(x, iormina) -> Recurring(x))\nforall x (Agitate(x, gabrila) -> Jubilate(gabrila, iormina))\nAgitate(iormina, linnie) and Buff(linnie) -> Profiteer(linnie, gabrila)\nforall x (Jubilate(x, patience) -> Profiteer(x, gabrila))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, linnie) -> Agitate(x, iormina))\nforall x (Recurring(x) -> Agitate(x, linnie))\nforall x (Assigned(x) and Agitate(x, linnie) -> Profiteer(linnie, iormina))\nforall x (Recurring(x) -> Jubilate(x, patience))\n\nJubilate(linnie, iormina)\n\ntherefore Jubilate(linnie, iormina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The park is thirsty. The rahal chitchat the park. The quincey is nonuniform. The bekki save the rahal. If someone save the rahal then they are nonuniform. If someone scum the park then the park save the rahal. If the rahal scum the bekki and the bekki is essential then the bekki chitchat the park. If someone save the quincey then they eat the park. If someone save the bekki then they see the rahal. If someone is nonuniform then they see the bekki. If someone is bluish and they see the bekki then the bekki chitchat the rahal. If someone is nonuniform then they chase the quincey. The quincey is not nonuniform.", "logic": "\nThirsty(park)\nChitchat(rahal, park)\nNonuniform(quincey)\nSave(bekki, rahal)\nforall x (Save(x, rahal) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Scum(x, park) -> Save(park, rahal))\nScum(rahal, bekki) and Essential(bekki) -> Chitchat(bekki, park)\nforall x (Save(x, quincey) -> Chitchat(x, park))\nforall x (Save(x, bekki) -> Scum(x, rahal))\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) -> Scum(x, bekki))\nforall x (Bluish(x) and Scum(x, bekki) -> Chitchat(bekki, rahal))\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) -> Save(x, quincey))\n\nnot Nonuniform(quincey)\n\ntherefore Nonuniform(quincey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The linet is regressive. The zacharia jingle the linet. The nertie is unfenced. The filippa tipple the zacharia. If someone tipple the zacharia then they are unfenced. If someone roast the linet then the linet tipple the zacharia. If the zacharia roast the filippa and the filippa is hunched then the filippa jingle the linet. If someone tipple the nertie then they eat the linet. If someone tipple the filippa then they see the zacharia. If someone is unfenced then they see the filippa. If someone is imitation and they see the filippa then the filippa jingle the zacharia. If someone is unfenced then they chase the nertie. The filippa is unfenced.", "logic": "\nRegressive(linet)\nJingle(zacharia, linet)\nUnfenced(nertie)\nTipple(filippa, zacharia)\nforall x (Tipple(x, zacharia) -> Unfenced(x))\nforall x (Roast(x, linet) -> Tipple(linet, zacharia))\nRoast(zacharia, filippa) and Hunched(filippa) -> Jingle(filippa, linet)\nforall x (Tipple(x, nertie) -> Jingle(x, linet))\nforall x (Tipple(x, filippa) -> Roast(x, zacharia))\nforall x (Unfenced(x) -> Roast(x, filippa))\nforall x (Imitation(x) and Roast(x, filippa) -> Jingle(filippa, zacharia))\nforall x (Unfenced(x) -> Tipple(x, nertie))\n\nUnfenced(filippa)\n\nTipple(filippa, zacharia) and forall x (Tipple(x, zacharia) -> Unfenced(x)) -> therefore Unfenced(filippa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The belia is liliaceous. The garcia autograph the belia. The gershom is unsanded. The gasper well the garcia. If someone well the garcia then they are unsanded. If someone club the belia then the belia well the garcia. If the garcia club the gasper and the gasper is thriving then the gasper autograph the belia. If someone well the gershom then they eat the belia. If someone well the gasper then they see the garcia. If someone is unsanded then they see the gasper. If someone is occupied and they see the gasper then the gasper autograph the garcia. If someone is unsanded then they chase the gershom. The gershom does not chase the gershom.", "logic": "\nLiliaceous(belia)\nAutograph(garcia, belia)\nUnsanded(gershom)\nWell(gasper, garcia)\nforall x (Well(x, garcia) -> Unsanded(x))\nforall x (Club(x, belia) -> Well(belia, garcia))\nClub(garcia, gasper) and Thriving(gasper) -> Autograph(gasper, belia)\nforall x (Well(x, gershom) -> Autograph(x, belia))\nforall x (Well(x, gasper) -> Club(x, garcia))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) -> Club(x, gasper))\nforall x (Occupied(x) and Club(x, gasper) -> Autograph(gasper, garcia))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) -> Well(x, gershom))\n\nnot Well(gershom, gershom)\n\nUnsanded(gershom) and forall x (Unsanded(x) -> Well(x, gershom)) -> therefore Well(gershom, gershom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The marget is unbelted. The phillida backhand the marget. The rufe is herbal. The jacquelyn outpace the phillida. If someone outpace the phillida then they are herbal. If someone grok the marget then the marget outpace the phillida. If the phillida grok the jacquelyn and the jacquelyn is aleuronic then the jacquelyn backhand the marget. If someone outpace the rufe then they eat the marget. If someone outpace the jacquelyn then they see the phillida. If someone is herbal then they see the jacquelyn. If someone is outclassed and they see the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn backhand the phillida. If someone is herbal then they chase the rufe. The rufe backhand the marget.", "logic": "\nUnbelted(marget)\nBackhand(phillida, marget)\nHerbal(rufe)\nOutpace(jacquelyn, phillida)\nforall x (Outpace(x, phillida) -> Herbal(x))\nforall x (Grok(x, marget) -> Outpace(marget, phillida))\nGrok(phillida, jacquelyn) and Aleuronic(jacquelyn) -> Backhand(jacquelyn, marget)\nforall x (Outpace(x, rufe) -> Backhand(x, marget))\nforall x (Outpace(x, jacquelyn) -> Grok(x, phillida))\nforall x (Herbal(x) -> Grok(x, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) and Grok(x, jacquelyn) -> Backhand(jacquelyn, phillida))\nforall x (Herbal(x) -> Outpace(x, rufe))\n\nBackhand(rufe, marget)\n\nHerbal(rufe) and forall x (Herbal(x) -> Outpace(x, rufe)) -> therefore Outpace(rufe, rufe) Outpace(rufe, rufe) and forall x (Outpace(x, rufe) -> Backhand(x, marget)) -> therefore Backhand(rufe, marget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The pattie is agrarian. The marco stereotype the pattie. The lavena is smokeless. The mady sting the marco. If someone sting the marco then they are smokeless. If someone unload the pattie then the pattie sting the marco. If the marco unload the mady and the mady is atrip then the mady stereotype the pattie. If someone sting the lavena then they eat the pattie. If someone sting the mady then they see the marco. If someone is smokeless then they see the mady. If someone is flooded and they see the mady then the mady stereotype the marco. If someone is smokeless then they chase the lavena. The lavena does not eat the pattie.", "logic": "\nAgrarian(pattie)\nStereotype(marco, pattie)\nSmokeless(lavena)\nSting(mady, marco)\nforall x (Sting(x, marco) -> Smokeless(x))\nforall x (Unload(x, pattie) -> Sting(pattie, marco))\nUnload(marco, mady) and Atrip(mady) -> Stereotype(mady, pattie)\nforall x (Sting(x, lavena) -> Stereotype(x, pattie))\nforall x (Sting(x, mady) -> Unload(x, marco))\nforall x (Smokeless(x) -> Unload(x, mady))\nforall x (Flooded(x) and Unload(x, mady) -> Stereotype(mady, marco))\nforall x (Smokeless(x) -> Sting(x, lavena))\n\nnot Stereotype(lavena, pattie)\n\nSmokeless(lavena) and forall x (Smokeless(x) -> Sting(x, lavena)) -> therefore Sting(lavena, lavena) Sting(lavena, lavena) and forall x (Sting(x, lavena) -> Stereotype(x, pattie)) -> therefore Stereotype(lavena, pattie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The novelia is triploid. The brier altercate the novelia. The annaliese is piercing. The barbe bushwhack the brier. If someone bushwhack the brier then they are piercing. If someone publicize the novelia then the novelia bushwhack the brier. If the brier publicize the barbe and the barbe is convenient then the barbe altercate the novelia. If someone bushwhack the annaliese then they eat the novelia. If someone bushwhack the barbe then they see the brier. If someone is piercing then they see the barbe. If someone is underlying and they see the barbe then the barbe altercate the brier. If someone is piercing then they chase the annaliese. The brier does not see the barbe.", "logic": "\nTriploid(novelia)\nAltercate(brier, novelia)\nPiercing(annaliese)\nBushwhack(barbe, brier)\nforall x (Bushwhack(x, brier) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Publicize(x, novelia) -> Bushwhack(novelia, brier))\nPublicize(brier, barbe) and Convenient(barbe) -> Altercate(barbe, novelia)\nforall x (Bushwhack(x, annaliese) -> Altercate(x, novelia))\nforall x (Bushwhack(x, barbe) -> Publicize(x, brier))\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Publicize(x, barbe))\nforall x (Underlying(x) and Publicize(x, barbe) -> Altercate(barbe, brier))\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Bushwhack(x, annaliese))\n\nnot Publicize(brier, barbe)\n\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Publicize(x, barbe)) <- forall x (Bushwhack(x, brier) -> Piercing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The jenna is approved. The natale overcome the jenna. The thorpe is huxleyan. The rufus itemize the natale. If someone itemize the natale then they are huxleyan. If someone blush the jenna then the jenna itemize the natale. If the natale blush the rufus and the rufus is anticancer then the rufus overcome the jenna. If someone itemize the thorpe then they eat the jenna. If someone itemize the rufus then they see the natale. If someone is huxleyan then they see the rufus. If someone is pressing and they see the rufus then the rufus overcome the natale. If someone is huxleyan then they chase the thorpe. The natale blush the natale.", "logic": "\nApproved(jenna)\nOvercome(natale, jenna)\nHuxleyan(thorpe)\nItemize(rufus, natale)\nforall x (Itemize(x, natale) -> Huxleyan(x))\nforall x (Blush(x, jenna) -> Itemize(jenna, natale))\nBlush(natale, rufus) and Anticancer(rufus) -> Overcome(rufus, jenna)\nforall x (Itemize(x, thorpe) -> Overcome(x, jenna))\nforall x (Itemize(x, rufus) -> Blush(x, natale))\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) -> Blush(x, rufus))\nforall x (Pressing(x) and Blush(x, rufus) -> Overcome(rufus, natale))\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) -> Itemize(x, thorpe))\n\nBlush(natale, natale)\n\nforall x (Itemize(x, rufus) -> Blush(x, natale)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The maggee is aspirant. The brynna beak the maggee. The magna is xciv. The janeva colourize the brynna. If someone colourize the brynna then they are xciv. If someone engraft the maggee then the maggee colourize the brynna. If the brynna engraft the janeva and the janeva is constant then the janeva beak the maggee. If someone colourize the magna then they eat the maggee. If someone colourize the janeva then they see the brynna. If someone is xciv then they see the janeva. If someone is unbeholden and they see the janeva then the janeva beak the brynna. If someone is xciv then they chase the magna. The janeva does not see the brynna.", "logic": "\nAspirant(maggee)\nBeak(brynna, maggee)\nXciv(magna)\nColourize(janeva, brynna)\nforall x (Colourize(x, brynna) -> Xciv(x))\nforall x (Engraft(x, maggee) -> Colourize(maggee, brynna))\nEngraft(brynna, janeva) and Constant(janeva) -> Beak(janeva, maggee)\nforall x (Colourize(x, magna) -> Beak(x, maggee))\nforall x (Colourize(x, janeva) -> Engraft(x, brynna))\nforall x (Xciv(x) -> Engraft(x, janeva))\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) and Engraft(x, janeva) -> Beak(janeva, brynna))\nforall x (Xciv(x) -> Colourize(x, magna))\n\nnot Engraft(janeva, brynna)\n\nforall x (Colourize(x, janeva) -> Engraft(x, brynna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The joelly is tatty. The vania founder the joelly. The corette is canted. The phaedra ditto the vania. If someone ditto the vania then they are canted. If someone systemize the joelly then the joelly ditto the vania. If the vania systemize the phaedra and the phaedra is quartzose then the phaedra founder the joelly. If someone ditto the corette then they eat the joelly. If someone ditto the phaedra then they see the vania. If someone is canted then they see the phaedra. If someone is billowy and they see the phaedra then the phaedra founder the vania. If someone is canted then they chase the corette. The corette ditto the vania.", "logic": "\nTatty(joelly)\nFounder(vania, joelly)\nCanted(corette)\nDitto(phaedra, vania)\nforall x (Ditto(x, vania) -> Canted(x))\nforall x (Systemize(x, joelly) -> Ditto(joelly, vania))\nSystemize(vania, phaedra) and Quartzose(phaedra) -> Founder(phaedra, joelly)\nforall x (Ditto(x, corette) -> Founder(x, joelly))\nforall x (Ditto(x, phaedra) -> Systemize(x, vania))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Systemize(x, phaedra))\nforall x (Billowy(x) and Systemize(x, phaedra) -> Founder(phaedra, vania))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Ditto(x, corette))\n\nDitto(corette, vania)\n\nDitto(corette, vania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The sherman is protanopic. The dimitris snarl the sherman. The katharina is unassuming. The mallory engineer the dimitris. If someone engineer the dimitris then they are unassuming. If someone find the sherman then the sherman engineer the dimitris. If the dimitris find the mallory and the mallory is glooming then the mallory snarl the sherman. If someone engineer the katharina then they eat the sherman. If someone engineer the mallory then they see the dimitris. If someone is unassuming then they see the mallory. If someone is batrachian and they see the mallory then the mallory snarl the dimitris. If someone is unassuming then they chase the katharina. The katharina is not protanopic.", "logic": "\nProtanopic(sherman)\nSnarl(dimitris, sherman)\nUnassuming(katharina)\nEngineer(mallory, dimitris)\nforall x (Engineer(x, dimitris) -> Unassuming(x))\nforall x (Find(x, sherman) -> Engineer(sherman, dimitris))\nFind(dimitris, mallory) and Glooming(mallory) -> Snarl(mallory, sherman)\nforall x (Engineer(x, katharina) -> Snarl(x, sherman))\nforall x (Engineer(x, mallory) -> Find(x, dimitris))\nforall x (Unassuming(x) -> Find(x, mallory))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) and Find(x, mallory) -> Snarl(mallory, dimitris))\nforall x (Unassuming(x) -> Engineer(x, katharina))\n\nnot Protanopic(katharina)\n\nnot Protanopic(katharina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "The zachery is stratified. The libby fustigate the zachery. The vicki is downstage. The kippy mosey the libby. If someone mosey the libby then they are downstage. If someone handcolour the zachery then the zachery mosey the libby. If the libby handcolour the kippy and the kippy is satiate then the kippy fustigate the zachery. If someone mosey the vicki then they eat the zachery. If someone mosey the kippy then they see the libby. If someone is downstage then they see the kippy. If someone is remindful and they see the kippy then the kippy fustigate the libby. If someone is downstage then they chase the vicki. The libby fustigate the vicki.", "logic": "\nStratified(zachery)\nFustigate(libby, zachery)\nDownstage(vicki)\nMosey(kippy, libby)\nforall x (Mosey(x, libby) -> Downstage(x))\nforall x (Handcolour(x, zachery) -> Mosey(zachery, libby))\nHandcolour(libby, kippy) and Satiate(kippy) -> Fustigate(kippy, zachery)\nforall x (Mosey(x, vicki) -> Fustigate(x, zachery))\nforall x (Mosey(x, kippy) -> Handcolour(x, libby))\nforall x (Downstage(x) -> Handcolour(x, kippy))\nforall x (Remindful(x) and Handcolour(x, kippy) -> Fustigate(kippy, libby))\nforall x (Downstage(x) -> Mosey(x, vicki))\n\nFustigate(libby, vicki)\n\nFustigate(libby, vicki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2143"} {"premises": "Elwyn is unsated. Elwyn is irrational. Kacie is irrational. Red things are gruff. Rough, unsated things are forbidden. If Elwyn is kenyan then Elwyn is ruminant. Elwyn is unsated.", "logic": "\nUnsated(elwyn)\nIrrational(elwyn)\nIrrational(kacie)\nforall x (Irrational(x) -> Gruff(x))\nforall x (Gruff(x) and Unsated(x) -> Forbidden(x))\nKenyan(elwyn) -> Ruminant(elwyn)\n\nUnsated(elwyn)\n\ntherefore Unsated(elwyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Gladys is zairese. Gladys is provisory. Iona is provisory. Red things are vincible. Rough, zairese things are atypical. If Gladys is intimate then Gladys is shared. Gladys is not zairese.", "logic": "\nZairese(gladys)\nProvisory(gladys)\nProvisory(iona)\nforall x (Provisory(x) -> Vincible(x))\nforall x (Vincible(x) and Zairese(x) -> Atypical(x))\nIntimate(gladys) -> Shared(gladys)\n\nnot Zairese(gladys)\n\ntherefore Zairese(gladys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Richmond is draining. Richmond is praising. Matt is praising. Red things are affixed. Rough, draining things are pierced. If Richmond is bracteate then Richmond is caudate. Richmond is affixed.", "logic": "\nDraining(richmond)\nPraising(richmond)\nPraising(matt)\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Affixed(x) and Draining(x) -> Pierced(x))\nBracteate(richmond) -> Caudate(richmond)\n\nAffixed(richmond)\n\nPraising(richmond) and forall x (Praising(x) -> Affixed(x)) -> therefore Affixed(richmond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Lora is separate. Lora is skeptical. Sander is skeptical. Red things are unnatural. Rough, separate things are repressive. If Lora is monovalent then Lora is sensitized. Sander is not unnatural.", "logic": "\nSeparate(lora)\nSkeptical(lora)\nSkeptical(sander)\nforall x (Skeptical(x) -> Unnatural(x))\nforall x (Unnatural(x) and Separate(x) -> Repressive(x))\nMonovalent(lora) -> Sensitized(lora)\n\nnot Unnatural(sander)\n\nSkeptical(sander) and forall x (Skeptical(x) -> Unnatural(x)) -> therefore Unnatural(sander)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Thorpe is adsorbate. Thorpe is unreduced. Robinett is unreduced. Red things are terrible. Rough, adsorbate things are tetchy. If Thorpe is splashy then Thorpe is arcuate. Thorpe is tetchy.", "logic": "\nAdsorbate(thorpe)\nUnreduced(thorpe)\nUnreduced(robinett)\nforall x (Unreduced(x) -> Terrible(x))\nforall x (Terrible(x) and Adsorbate(x) -> Tetchy(x))\nSplashy(thorpe) -> Arcuate(thorpe)\n\nTetchy(thorpe)\n\nUnreduced(thorpe) and forall x (Unreduced(x) -> Terrible(x)) -> therefore Terrible(thorpe) Terrible(thorpe) and Adsorbate(thorpe) and forall x (Terrible(x) and Adsorbate(x) -> Tetchy(x)) -> therefore Tetchy(thorpe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Steward is patterned. Steward is untaught. Antonio is untaught. Red things are valuable. Rough, patterned things are titillated. If Steward is rimed then Steward is horny. Steward is not titillated.", "logic": "\nPatterned(steward)\nUntaught(steward)\nUntaught(antonio)\nforall x (Untaught(x) -> Valuable(x))\nforall x (Valuable(x) and Patterned(x) -> Titillated(x))\nRimed(steward) -> Horny(steward)\n\nnot Titillated(steward)\n\nUntaught(steward) and forall x (Untaught(x) -> Valuable(x)) -> therefore Valuable(steward) Valuable(steward) and Patterned(steward) and forall x (Valuable(x) and Patterned(x) -> Titillated(x)) -> therefore Titillated(steward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Evita is canorous. Evita is calvinist. Rainer is calvinist. Red things are nontaxable. Rough, canorous things are twilled. If Evita is hearsay then Evita is plumy. Evita is not plumy.", "logic": "\nCanorous(evita)\nCalvinist(evita)\nCalvinist(rainer)\nforall x (Calvinist(x) -> Nontaxable(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and Canorous(x) -> Twilled(x))\nHearsay(evita) -> Plumy(evita)\n\nnot Plumy(evita)\n\nHearsay(evita) -> Plumy(evita) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Ulla is bifocal. Ulla is ripe. Farrah is ripe. Red things are barefooted. Rough, bifocal things are sexual. If Ulla is decurved then Ulla is cloudless. Farrah is sexual.", "logic": "\nBifocal(ulla)\nRipe(ulla)\nRipe(farrah)\nforall x (Ripe(x) -> Barefooted(x))\nforall x (Barefooted(x) and Bifocal(x) -> Sexual(x))\nDecurved(ulla) -> Cloudless(ulla)\n\nSexual(farrah)\n\nforall x (Barefooted(x) and Bifocal(x) -> Sexual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Aurie is outlined. Aurie is ferric. Cariotta is ferric. Red things are scrubbed. Rough, outlined things are algonquin. If Aurie is devious then Aurie is telephonic. Cariotta is not telephonic.", "logic": "\nOutlined(aurie)\nFerric(aurie)\nFerric(cariotta)\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> Scrubbed(x))\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) and Outlined(x) -> Algonquin(x))\nDevious(aurie) -> Telephonic(aurie)\n\nnot Telephonic(cariotta)\n\nnot Telephonic(cariotta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Hayden is taboo. Hayden is subsonic. Alston is subsonic. Red things are unrentable. Rough, taboo things are divorced. If Hayden is bimetallic then Hayden is orwellian. Alston is quiet.", "logic": "\nTaboo(hayden)\nSubsonic(hayden)\nSubsonic(alston)\nforall x (Subsonic(x) -> Unrentable(x))\nforall x (Unrentable(x) and Taboo(x) -> Divorced(x))\nBimetallic(hayden) -> Orwellian(hayden)\n\nQuiet(alston)\n\nQuiet(alston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Joann is heliac. Joann is enlarged. Cyndi is enlarged. Red things are egoistic. Rough, heliac things are aluminous. If Joann is antonymous then Joann is mazy. Cyndi is not antonymous.", "logic": "\nHeliac(joann)\nEnlarged(joann)\nEnlarged(cyndi)\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) and Heliac(x) -> Aluminous(x))\nAntonymous(joann) -> Mazy(joann)\n\nnot Antonymous(cyndi)\n\nnot Antonymous(cyndi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Waring is grateful. Waring is apsidal. Maryanna is apsidal. Red things are antacid. Rough, grateful things are vivid. If Waring is monecious then Waring is watercress. Waring is monecious.", "logic": "\nGrateful(waring)\nApsidal(waring)\nApsidal(maryanna)\nforall x (Apsidal(x) -> Antacid(x))\nforall x (Antacid(x) and Grateful(x) -> Vivid(x))\nMonecious(waring) -> Watercress(waring)\n\nMonecious(waring)\n\nMonecious(waring) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Marinna is barbed. Claude is barbed. Evey is roomy. All umpteenth, barbed people are modified. All alated, noncausal people are roomy. If someone is umpteenth then they are noncausal. All noncausal people are umpteenth. All noncausal people are modified. All barbed people are noncausal. All modified, barbed people are hairless. If someone is modified then they are barbed. Claude is barbed.", "logic": "\nBarbed(marinna)\nBarbed(claude)\nRoomy(evey)\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) and Barbed(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) and Noncausal(x) -> Roomy(x))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Umpteenth(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Barbed(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) and Barbed(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) -> Barbed(x))\n\nBarbed(claude)\n\ntherefore Barbed(claude)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Seka is minoan. Ichabod is minoan. Maurie is repellent. All detachable, minoan people are sneezy. All conical, thenal people are repellent. If someone is detachable then they are thenal. All thenal people are detachable. All thenal people are sneezy. All minoan people are thenal. All sneezy, minoan people are colonic. If someone is sneezy then they are minoan. Seka is not minoan.", "logic": "\nMinoan(seka)\nMinoan(ichabod)\nRepellent(maurie)\nforall x (Detachable(x) and Minoan(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Conical(x) and Thenal(x) -> Repellent(x))\nforall x (Detachable(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Thenal(x) -> Detachable(x))\nforall x (Thenal(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Minoan(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) and Minoan(x) -> Colonic(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Minoan(x))\n\nnot Minoan(seka)\n\ntherefore Minoan(seka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Odessa is stainless. Kaylee is stainless. Simeon is unservile. All evaporable, stainless people are halal. All homey, chinless people are unservile. If someone is evaporable then they are chinless. All chinless people are evaporable. All chinless people are halal. All stainless people are chinless. All halal, stainless people are unspaced. If someone is halal then they are stainless. Odessa is chinless.", "logic": "\nStainless(odessa)\nStainless(kaylee)\nUnservile(simeon)\nforall x (Evaporable(x) and Stainless(x) -> Halal(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) and Chinless(x) -> Unservile(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) -> Chinless(x))\nforall x (Chinless(x) -> Evaporable(x))\nforall x (Chinless(x) -> Halal(x))\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Chinless(x))\nforall x (Halal(x) and Stainless(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nforall x (Halal(x) -> Stainless(x))\n\nChinless(odessa)\n\nStainless(odessa) and forall x (Stainless(x) -> Chinless(x)) -> therefore Chinless(odessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Benjamin is exilic. Ulla is exilic. Madalyn is lightproof. All hemostatic, exilic people are boorish. All fucking, brasslike people are lightproof. If someone is hemostatic then they are brasslike. All brasslike people are hemostatic. All brasslike people are boorish. All exilic people are brasslike. All boorish, exilic people are untrodden. If someone is boorish then they are exilic. Benjamin is not brasslike.", "logic": "\nExilic(benjamin)\nExilic(ulla)\nLightproof(madalyn)\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) and Exilic(x) -> Boorish(x))\nforall x (Fucking(x) and Brasslike(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) -> Brasslike(x))\nforall x (Brasslike(x) -> Hemostatic(x))\nforall x (Brasslike(x) -> Boorish(x))\nforall x (Exilic(x) -> Brasslike(x))\nforall x (Boorish(x) and Exilic(x) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Boorish(x) -> Exilic(x))\n\nnot Brasslike(benjamin)\n\nExilic(benjamin) and forall x (Exilic(x) -> Brasslike(x)) -> therefore Brasslike(benjamin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Tarra is urethral. Britney is urethral. Ayn is unbeaten. All glaucous, urethral people are articled. All fearsome, luxe people are unbeaten. If someone is glaucous then they are luxe. All luxe people are glaucous. All luxe people are articled. All urethral people are luxe. All articled, urethral people are crocked. If someone is articled then they are urethral. Tarra is articled.", "logic": "\nUrethral(tarra)\nUrethral(britney)\nUnbeaten(ayn)\nforall x (Glaucous(x) and Urethral(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) and Luxe(x) -> Unbeaten(x))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Luxe(x))\nforall x (Luxe(x) -> Glaucous(x))\nforall x (Luxe(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Urethral(x) -> Luxe(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) and Urethral(x) -> Crocked(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Urethral(x))\n\nArticled(tarra)\n\nUrethral(tarra) and forall x (Urethral(x) -> Luxe(x)) -> therefore Luxe(tarra) Luxe(tarra) and forall x (Luxe(x) -> Articled(x)) -> therefore Articled(tarra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Tilda is telescopic. Francoise is telescopic. Cassandre is combatant. All xcvii, telescopic people are tainted. All tumid, guileless people are combatant. If someone is xcvii then they are guileless. All guileless people are xcvii. All guileless people are tainted. All telescopic people are guileless. All tainted, telescopic people are delicious. If someone is tainted then they are telescopic. Francoise is not xcvii.", "logic": "\nTelescopic(tilda)\nTelescopic(francoise)\nCombatant(cassandre)\nforall x (Xcvii(x) and Telescopic(x) -> Tainted(x))\nforall x (Tumid(x) and Guileless(x) -> Combatant(x))\nforall x (Xcvii(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> Xcvii(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> Tainted(x))\nforall x (Telescopic(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Tainted(x) and Telescopic(x) -> Delicious(x))\nforall x (Tainted(x) -> Telescopic(x))\n\nnot Xcvii(francoise)\n\nTelescopic(francoise) and forall x (Telescopic(x) -> Guileless(x)) -> therefore Guileless(francoise) Guileless(francoise) and forall x (Guileless(x) -> Xcvii(x)) -> therefore Xcvii(francoise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Pieter is venereal. Biff is venereal. Augie is unexpected. All norwegian, venereal people are cetacean. All mormon, unalert people are unexpected. If someone is norwegian then they are unalert. All unalert people are norwegian. All unalert people are cetacean. All venereal people are unalert. All cetacean, venereal people are veinal. If someone is cetacean then they are venereal. Augie is not veinal.", "logic": "\nVenereal(pieter)\nVenereal(biff)\nUnexpected(augie)\nforall x (Norwegian(x) and Venereal(x) -> Cetacean(x))\nforall x (Mormon(x) and Unalert(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Norwegian(x) -> Unalert(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) -> Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) -> Cetacean(x))\nforall x (Venereal(x) -> Unalert(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) and Venereal(x) -> Veinal(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) -> Venereal(x))\n\nnot Veinal(augie)\n\nforall x (Cetacean(x) and Venereal(x) -> Veinal(x)) <- forall x (Cetacean(x) -> Venereal(x)) <- forall x (Unalert(x) -> Cetacean(x)) <- forall x (Norwegian(x) -> Unalert(x)) <- forall x (Unalert(x) -> Norwegian(x)) <- forall x (Venereal(x) -> Unalert(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Tod is mini. Jud is mini. Webb is moveable. All famous, mini people are coexisting. All verbalized, lanceolate people are moveable. If someone is famous then they are lanceolate. All lanceolate people are famous. All lanceolate people are coexisting. All mini people are lanceolate. All coexisting, mini people are directed. If someone is coexisting then they are mini. Webb is coexisting.", "logic": "\nMini(tod)\nMini(jud)\nMoveable(webb)\nforall x (Famous(x) and Mini(x) -> Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Verbalized(x) and Lanceolate(x) -> Moveable(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Lanceolate(x))\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) -> Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Mini(x) -> Lanceolate(x))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) and Mini(x) -> Directed(x))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) -> Mini(x))\n\nCoexisting(webb)\n\nforall x (Famous(x) and Mini(x) -> Coexisting(x)) <- forall x (Lanceolate(x) -> Famous(x)) <- forall x (Mini(x) -> Lanceolate(x)) <- forall x (Coexisting(x) -> Mini(x)) <- forall x (Lanceolate(x) -> Coexisting(x)) <- forall x (Famous(x) -> Lanceolate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Hermione is tyrolese. Muriel is tyrolese. Carena is veined. All demanding, tyrolese people are bearded. All twopenny, runproof people are veined. If someone is demanding then they are runproof. All runproof people are demanding. All runproof people are bearded. All tyrolese people are runproof. All bearded, tyrolese people are vestiary. If someone is bearded then they are tyrolese. Carena is not demanding.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(hermione)\nTyrolese(muriel)\nVeined(carena)\nforall x (Demanding(x) and Tyrolese(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Runproof(x) -> Veined(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Runproof(x))\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Demanding(x))\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Runproof(x))\nforall x (Bearded(x) and Tyrolese(x) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Bearded(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\n\nnot Demanding(carena)\n\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Demanding(x)) <- forall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Runproof(x)) <- forall x (Bearded(x) -> Tyrolese(x)) <- forall x (Runproof(x) -> Bearded(x)) <- forall x (Demanding(x) -> Runproof(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Nana is perigonal. Scott is perigonal. Torrey is concave. All tearless, perigonal people are arched. All bobtailed, arbitral people are concave. If someone is tearless then they are arbitral. All arbitral people are tearless. All arbitral people are arched. All perigonal people are arbitral. All arched, perigonal people are rosaceous. If someone is arched then they are perigonal. Nana is bobtailed.", "logic": "\nPerigonal(nana)\nPerigonal(scott)\nConcave(torrey)\nforall x (Tearless(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Arched(x))\nforall x (Bobtailed(x) and Arbitral(x) -> Concave(x))\nforall x (Tearless(x) -> Arbitral(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) -> Tearless(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) -> Arched(x))\nforall x (Perigonal(x) -> Arbitral(x))\nforall x (Arched(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Arched(x) -> Perigonal(x))\n\nBobtailed(nana)\n\nBobtailed(nana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Daisi is aleatory. Georgetta is aleatory. Desiri is diametral. All vermillion, aleatory people are rustless. All frenetic, childless people are diametral. If someone is vermillion then they are childless. All childless people are vermillion. All childless people are rustless. All aleatory people are childless. All rustless, aleatory people are sexy. If someone is rustless then they are aleatory. Georgetta is not frenetic.", "logic": "\nAleatory(daisi)\nAleatory(georgetta)\nDiametral(desiri)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) and Aleatory(x) -> Rustless(x))\nforall x (Frenetic(x) and Childless(x) -> Diametral(x))\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Rustless(x))\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Rustless(x) and Aleatory(x) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Aleatory(x))\n\nnot Frenetic(georgetta)\n\nnot Frenetic(georgetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Misha is impugnable. Margarete is impugnable. Ginnifer is banging. All semite, impugnable people are voluptuary. All outback, sensitised people are banging. If someone is semite then they are sensitised. All sensitised people are semite. All sensitised people are voluptuary. All impugnable people are sensitised. All voluptuary, impugnable people are mucoid. If someone is voluptuary then they are impugnable. Ginnifer is outback.", "logic": "\nImpugnable(misha)\nImpugnable(margarete)\nBanging(ginnifer)\nforall x (Semite(x) and Impugnable(x) -> Voluptuary(x))\nforall x (Outback(x) and Sensitised(x) -> Banging(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Sensitised(x))\nforall x (Sensitised(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Sensitised(x) -> Voluptuary(x))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) -> Sensitised(x))\nforall x (Voluptuary(x) and Impugnable(x) -> Mucoid(x))\nforall x (Voluptuary(x) -> Impugnable(x))\n\nOutback(ginnifer)\n\nOutback(ginnifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "Kissee is unfilled. Emmi is monogamous. Emmi is unitarian. All purblind people are fulsome. If someone is unfilled and chiasmic then they are innocent. Big, unitarian people are unfilled. All unitarian people are purblind. Big people are unitarian. If Emmi is chiasmic and Emmi is fulsome then Emmi is monogamous. Nice people are purblind. If someone is innocent then they are purblind. Emmi is unitarian.", "logic": "\nUnfilled(kissee)\nMonogamous(emmi)\nUnitarian(emmi)\nforall x (Purblind(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Unfilled(x) and Chiasmic(x) -> Innocent(x))\nforall x (Purblind(x) and Unitarian(x) -> Unfilled(x))\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Purblind(x))\nforall x (Purblind(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nChiasmic(emmi) and Fulsome(emmi) -> Monogamous(emmi)\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Purblind(x))\nforall x (Innocent(x) -> Purblind(x))\n\nUnitarian(emmi)\n\ntherefore Unitarian(emmi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Lynelle is known. Dewey is uncounted. Dewey is poised. All rousing people are normative. If someone is known and handless then they are brutish. Big, poised people are known. All poised people are rousing. Big people are poised. If Dewey is handless and Dewey is normative then Dewey is uncounted. Nice people are rousing. If someone is brutish then they are rousing. Dewey is not poised.", "logic": "\nKnown(lynelle)\nUncounted(dewey)\nPoised(dewey)\nforall x (Rousing(x) -> Normative(x))\nforall x (Known(x) and Handless(x) -> Brutish(x))\nforall x (Rousing(x) and Poised(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Rousing(x) -> Poised(x))\nHandless(dewey) and Normative(dewey) -> Uncounted(dewey)\nforall x (Handless(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Brutish(x) -> Rousing(x))\n\nnot Poised(dewey)\n\ntherefore Poised(dewey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Augie is stertorous. Gertrudis is completing. Gertrudis is leavened. All sardonic people are certified. If someone is stertorous and colonic then they are liver. Big, leavened people are stertorous. All leavened people are sardonic. Big people are leavened. If Gertrudis is colonic and Gertrudis is certified then Gertrudis is completing. Nice people are sardonic. If someone is liver then they are sardonic. Gertrudis is sardonic.", "logic": "\nStertorous(augie)\nCompleting(gertrudis)\nLeavened(gertrudis)\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Certified(x))\nforall x (Stertorous(x) and Colonic(x) -> Liver(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) and Leavened(x) -> Stertorous(x))\nforall x (Leavened(x) -> Sardonic(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Leavened(x))\nColonic(gertrudis) and Certified(gertrudis) -> Completing(gertrudis)\nforall x (Colonic(x) -> Sardonic(x))\nforall x (Liver(x) -> Sardonic(x))\n\nSardonic(gertrudis)\n\nLeavened(gertrudis) and forall x (Leavened(x) -> Sardonic(x)) -> therefore Sardonic(gertrudis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Amanda is unrigged. Kam is sewn. Kam is supportive. All pedestrian people are huffish. If someone is unrigged and unilateral then they are lamenting. Big, supportive people are unrigged. All supportive people are pedestrian. Big people are supportive. If Kam is unilateral and Kam is huffish then Kam is sewn. Nice people are pedestrian. If someone is lamenting then they are pedestrian. Kam is not pedestrian.", "logic": "\nUnrigged(amanda)\nSewn(kam)\nSupportive(kam)\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> Huffish(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) and Unilateral(x) -> Lamenting(x))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) and Supportive(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> Supportive(x))\nUnilateral(kam) and Huffish(kam) -> Sewn(kam)\nforall x (Unilateral(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Lamenting(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\n\nnot Pedestrian(kam)\n\nSupportive(kam) and forall x (Supportive(x) -> Pedestrian(x)) -> therefore Pedestrian(kam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Allina is eligible. Norine is preserved. Norine is inclement. All bush people are undulate. If someone is eligible and paternal then they are grand. Big, inclement people are eligible. All inclement people are bush. Big people are inclement. If Norine is paternal and Norine is undulate then Norine is preserved. Nice people are bush. If someone is grand then they are bush. Norine is eligible.", "logic": "\nEligible(allina)\nPreserved(norine)\nInclement(norine)\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Undulate(x))\nforall x (Eligible(x) and Paternal(x) -> Grand(x))\nforall x (Bush(x) and Inclement(x) -> Eligible(x))\nforall x (Inclement(x) -> Bush(x))\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Inclement(x))\nPaternal(norine) and Undulate(norine) -> Preserved(norine)\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> Bush(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Bush(x))\n\nEligible(norine)\n\nInclement(norine) and forall x (Inclement(x) -> Bush(x)) -> therefore Bush(norine) Bush(norine) and Inclement(norine) and forall x (Bush(x) and Inclement(x) -> Eligible(x)) -> therefore Eligible(norine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Gianna is extra. Robby is keyed. Robby is opulent. All dextrorse people are stilted. If someone is extra and jobless then they are weatherly. Big, opulent people are extra. All opulent people are dextrorse. Big people are opulent. If Robby is jobless and Robby is stilted then Robby is keyed. Nice people are dextrorse. If someone is weatherly then they are dextrorse. Robby is not stilted.", "logic": "\nExtra(gianna)\nKeyed(robby)\nOpulent(robby)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Extra(x) and Jobless(x) -> Weatherly(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and Opulent(x) -> Extra(x))\nforall x (Opulent(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Opulent(x))\nJobless(robby) and Stilted(robby) -> Keyed(robby)\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\n\nnot Stilted(robby)\n\nOpulent(robby) and forall x (Opulent(x) -> Dextrorse(x)) -> therefore Dextrorse(robby) Dextrorse(robby) and forall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Stilted(x)) -> therefore Stilted(robby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Alla is unpopular. Pepi is horrible. Pepi is unpleasing. All contrite people are holozoic. If someone is unpopular and feudal then they are fulgurous. Big, unpleasing people are unpopular. All unpleasing people are contrite. Big people are unpleasing. If Pepi is feudal and Pepi is holozoic then Pepi is horrible. Nice people are contrite. If someone is fulgurous then they are contrite. Alla is not contrite.", "logic": "\nUnpopular(alla)\nHorrible(pepi)\nUnpleasing(pepi)\nforall x (Contrite(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Unpopular(x) and Feudal(x) -> Fulgurous(x))\nforall x (Contrite(x) and Unpleasing(x) -> Unpopular(x))\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Contrite(x))\nforall x (Contrite(x) -> Unpleasing(x))\nFeudal(pepi) and Holozoic(pepi) -> Horrible(pepi)\nforall x (Feudal(x) -> Contrite(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Contrite(x))\n\nnot Contrite(alla)\n\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Contrite(x)) <- forall x (Contrite(x) -> Unpleasing(x)) <- forall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Contrite(x)) <- forall x (Unpopular(x) and Feudal(x) -> Fulgurous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Helen is backswept. Shaina is indigent. Shaina is shocked. All beatable people are mercuric. If someone is backswept and fraternal then they are ninetieth. Big, shocked people are backswept. All shocked people are beatable. Big people are shocked. If Shaina is fraternal and Shaina is mercuric then Shaina is indigent. Nice people are beatable. If someone is ninetieth then they are beatable. Shaina is ninetieth.", "logic": "\nBackswept(helen)\nIndigent(shaina)\nShocked(shaina)\nforall x (Beatable(x) -> Mercuric(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) and Fraternal(x) -> Ninetieth(x))\nforall x (Beatable(x) and Shocked(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Shocked(x) -> Beatable(x))\nforall x (Beatable(x) -> Shocked(x))\nFraternal(shaina) and Mercuric(shaina) -> Indigent(shaina)\nforall x (Fraternal(x) -> Beatable(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) -> Beatable(x))\n\nNinetieth(shaina)\n\nforall x (Backswept(x) and Fraternal(x) -> Ninetieth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Maynord is singing. Thacher is jellied. Thacher is bisontine. All nonuniform people are motionless. If someone is singing and sheeplike then they are global. Big, bisontine people are singing. All bisontine people are nonuniform. Big people are bisontine. If Thacher is sheeplike and Thacher is motionless then Thacher is jellied. Nice people are nonuniform. If someone is global then they are nonuniform. Maynord is not motionless.", "logic": "\nSinging(maynord)\nJellied(thacher)\nBisontine(thacher)\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) -> Motionless(x))\nforall x (Singing(x) and Sheeplike(x) -> Global(x))\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) and Bisontine(x) -> Singing(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) -> Bisontine(x))\nSheeplike(thacher) and Motionless(thacher) -> Jellied(thacher)\nforall x (Sheeplike(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Global(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\n\nnot Motionless(maynord)\n\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) -> Motionless(x)) <- forall x (Bisontine(x) -> Nonuniform(x)) <- forall x (Nonuniform(x) -> Bisontine(x)) <- forall x (Global(x) -> Nonuniform(x)) <- forall x (Singing(x) and Sheeplike(x) -> Global(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Eartha is unhewn. Anselma is giddy. Anselma is alleged. All italian people are farfetched. If someone is unhewn and gallant then they are giant. Big, alleged people are unhewn. All alleged people are italian. Big people are alleged. If Anselma is gallant and Anselma is farfetched then Anselma is giddy. Nice people are italian. If someone is giant then they are italian. Anselma is gallant.", "logic": "\nUnhewn(eartha)\nGiddy(anselma)\nAlleged(anselma)\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Farfetched(x))\nforall x (Unhewn(x) and Gallant(x) -> Giant(x))\nforall x (Italian(x) and Alleged(x) -> Unhewn(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Italian(x))\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Alleged(x))\nGallant(anselma) and Farfetched(anselma) -> Giddy(anselma)\nforall x (Gallant(x) -> Italian(x))\nforall x (Giant(x) -> Italian(x))\n\nGallant(anselma)\n\nGallant(anselma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Lynna is stubborn. Briny is fancied. Briny is crude. All metabolic people are hydrated. If someone is stubborn and rabid then they are camphoric. Big, crude people are stubborn. All crude people are metabolic. Big people are crude. If Briny is rabid and Briny is hydrated then Briny is fancied. Nice people are metabolic. If someone is camphoric then they are metabolic. Lynna is not rabid.", "logic": "\nStubborn(lynna)\nFancied(briny)\nCrude(briny)\nforall x (Metabolic(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) and Rabid(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Crude(x) -> Stubborn(x))\nforall x (Crude(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) -> Crude(x))\nRabid(briny) and Hydrated(briny) -> Fancied(briny)\nforall x (Rabid(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Metabolic(x))\n\nnot Rabid(lynna)\n\nnot Rabid(lynna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Inga is unwoven. Debby is dirt. Debby is libellous. All encircling people are pulmonic. If someone is unwoven and seminude then they are identical. Big, libellous people are unwoven. All libellous people are encircling. Big people are libellous. If Debby is seminude and Debby is pulmonic then Debby is dirt. Nice people are encircling. If someone is identical then they are encircling. Inga is dirt.", "logic": "\nUnwoven(inga)\nDirt(debby)\nLibellous(debby)\nforall x (Encircling(x) -> Pulmonic(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Seminude(x) -> Identical(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Libellous(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nforall x (Libellous(x) -> Encircling(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) -> Libellous(x))\nSeminude(debby) and Pulmonic(debby) -> Dirt(debby)\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Encircling(x))\nforall x (Identical(x) -> Encircling(x))\n\nDirt(inga)\n\nDirt(inga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-83"} {"premises": "Erda is columbian. Erda is drumhead. Erda is unreactive. Erda is athletic. Erda is aphyllous. Israel is enfeebling. Israel is drumhead. Israel is athletic. Jimmie is enfeebling. Jimmie is drumhead. Jimmie is unreactive. Rodd is athletic. All athletic people are unreactive. If someone is columbian then they are aphyllous. If someone is enfeebling and aphyllous then they are drumhead. If Erda is aphyllous and Erda is enfeebling then Erda is uric. All uric, athletic people are drumhead. If someone is drumhead and athletic then they are enfeebling. All drumhead, athletic people are columbian. All enfeebling, drumhead people are athletic. Jimmie is enfeebling.", "logic": "\nColumbian(erda)\nDrumhead(erda)\nUnreactive(erda)\nAthletic(erda)\nAphyllous(erda)\nEnfeebling(israel)\nDrumhead(israel)\nAthletic(israel)\nEnfeebling(jimmie)\nDrumhead(jimmie)\nUnreactive(jimmie)\nAthletic(rodd)\nforall x (Athletic(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Columbian(x) -> Aphyllous(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) and Aphyllous(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nAphyllous(erda) and Enfeebling(erda) -> Uric(erda)\nforall x (Uric(x) and Athletic(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) and Athletic(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) and Athletic(x) -> Columbian(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) and Drumhead(x) -> Athletic(x))\n\nEnfeebling(jimmie)\n\ntherefore Enfeebling(jimmie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Clarinda is grumous. Clarinda is dubitable. Clarinda is ellipsoid. Clarinda is boiled. Clarinda is unrewarded. Isabelle is freewill. Isabelle is dubitable. Isabelle is boiled. Jeremy is freewill. Jeremy is dubitable. Jeremy is ellipsoid. Lisette is boiled. All boiled people are ellipsoid. If someone is grumous then they are unrewarded. If someone is freewill and unrewarded then they are dubitable. If Clarinda is unrewarded and Clarinda is freewill then Clarinda is heatable. All heatable, boiled people are dubitable. If someone is dubitable and boiled then they are freewill. All dubitable, boiled people are grumous. All freewill, dubitable people are boiled. Jeremy is not ellipsoid.", "logic": "\nGrumous(clarinda)\nDubitable(clarinda)\nEllipsoid(clarinda)\nBoiled(clarinda)\nUnrewarded(clarinda)\nFreewill(isabelle)\nDubitable(isabelle)\nBoiled(isabelle)\nFreewill(jeremy)\nDubitable(jeremy)\nEllipsoid(jeremy)\nBoiled(lisette)\nforall x (Boiled(x) -> Ellipsoid(x))\nforall x (Grumous(x) -> Unrewarded(x))\nforall x (Freewill(x) and Unrewarded(x) -> Dubitable(x))\nUnrewarded(clarinda) and Freewill(clarinda) -> Heatable(clarinda)\nforall x (Heatable(x) and Boiled(x) -> Dubitable(x))\nforall x (Dubitable(x) and Boiled(x) -> Freewill(x))\nforall x (Dubitable(x) and Boiled(x) -> Grumous(x))\nforall x (Freewill(x) and Dubitable(x) -> Boiled(x))\n\nnot Ellipsoid(jeremy)\n\ntherefore Ellipsoid(jeremy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Fulvia is unkind. Fulvia is subaquatic. Fulvia is sabbatic. Fulvia is gamey. Fulvia is acherontic. Alley is downscale. Alley is subaquatic. Alley is gamey. Amelita is downscale. Amelita is subaquatic. Amelita is sabbatic. Gloria is gamey. All gamey people are sabbatic. If someone is unkind then they are acherontic. If someone is downscale and acherontic then they are subaquatic. If Fulvia is acherontic and Fulvia is downscale then Fulvia is palmar. All palmar, gamey people are subaquatic. If someone is subaquatic and gamey then they are downscale. All subaquatic, gamey people are unkind. All downscale, subaquatic people are gamey. Fulvia is downscale.", "logic": "\nUnkind(fulvia)\nSubaquatic(fulvia)\nSabbatic(fulvia)\nGamey(fulvia)\nAcherontic(fulvia)\nDownscale(alley)\nSubaquatic(alley)\nGamey(alley)\nDownscale(amelita)\nSubaquatic(amelita)\nSabbatic(amelita)\nGamey(gloria)\nforall x (Gamey(x) -> Sabbatic(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Downscale(x) and Acherontic(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\nAcherontic(fulvia) and Downscale(fulvia) -> Palmar(fulvia)\nforall x (Palmar(x) and Gamey(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) and Gamey(x) -> Downscale(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) and Gamey(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Downscale(x) and Subaquatic(x) -> Gamey(x))\n\nDownscale(fulvia)\n\nSubaquatic(fulvia) and Gamey(fulvia) and forall x (Subaquatic(x) and Gamey(x) -> Downscale(x)) -> therefore Downscale(fulvia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Rayshell is drizzling. Rayshell is reflex. Rayshell is cenozoic. Rayshell is charmed. Rayshell is lxxxvi. Dusty is seaworthy. Dusty is reflex. Dusty is charmed. Larine is seaworthy. Larine is reflex. Larine is cenozoic. Hassan is charmed. All charmed people are cenozoic. If someone is drizzling then they are lxxxvi. If someone is seaworthy and lxxxvi then they are reflex. If Rayshell is lxxxvi and Rayshell is seaworthy then Rayshell is crisscross. All crisscross, charmed people are reflex. If someone is reflex and charmed then they are seaworthy. All reflex, charmed people are drizzling. All seaworthy, reflex people are charmed. Dusty is not drizzling.", "logic": "\nDrizzling(rayshell)\nReflex(rayshell)\nCenozoic(rayshell)\nCharmed(rayshell)\nLxxxvi(rayshell)\nSeaworthy(dusty)\nReflex(dusty)\nCharmed(dusty)\nSeaworthy(larine)\nReflex(larine)\nCenozoic(larine)\nCharmed(hassan)\nforall x (Charmed(x) -> Cenozoic(x))\nforall x (Drizzling(x) -> Lxxxvi(x))\nforall x (Seaworthy(x) and Lxxxvi(x) -> Reflex(x))\nLxxxvi(rayshell) and Seaworthy(rayshell) -> Crisscross(rayshell)\nforall x (Crisscross(x) and Charmed(x) -> Reflex(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Charmed(x) -> Seaworthy(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Charmed(x) -> Drizzling(x))\nforall x (Seaworthy(x) and Reflex(x) -> Charmed(x))\n\nnot Drizzling(dusty)\n\nReflex(dusty) and Charmed(dusty) and forall x (Reflex(x) and Charmed(x) -> Drizzling(x)) -> therefore Drizzling(dusty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Aubry is known. Aubry is carousing. Aubry is didactical. Aubry is receptive. Aubry is majuscular. Dynah is alluvial. Dynah is carousing. Dynah is receptive. Robby is alluvial. Robby is carousing. Robby is didactical. Antonino is receptive. All receptive people are didactical. If someone is known then they are majuscular. If someone is alluvial and majuscular then they are carousing. If Aubry is majuscular and Aubry is alluvial then Aubry is rancid. All rancid, receptive people are carousing. If someone is carousing and receptive then they are alluvial. All carousing, receptive people are known. All alluvial, carousing people are receptive. Aubry is rancid.", "logic": "\nKnown(aubry)\nCarousing(aubry)\nDidactical(aubry)\nReceptive(aubry)\nMajuscular(aubry)\nAlluvial(dynah)\nCarousing(dynah)\nReceptive(dynah)\nAlluvial(robby)\nCarousing(robby)\nDidactical(robby)\nReceptive(antonino)\nforall x (Receptive(x) -> Didactical(x))\nforall x (Known(x) -> Majuscular(x))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) and Majuscular(x) -> Carousing(x))\nMajuscular(aubry) and Alluvial(aubry) -> Rancid(aubry)\nforall x (Rancid(x) and Receptive(x) -> Carousing(x))\nforall x (Carousing(x) and Receptive(x) -> Alluvial(x))\nforall x (Carousing(x) and Receptive(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) and Carousing(x) -> Receptive(x))\n\nRancid(aubry)\n\nCarousing(aubry) and Receptive(aubry) and forall x (Carousing(x) and Receptive(x) -> Alluvial(x)) -> therefore Alluvial(aubry) Majuscular(aubry) and Alluvial(aubry) and Majuscular(aubry) and Alluvial(aubry) -> Rancid(aubry) -> therefore Rancid(aubry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Edita is flooded. Edita is arresting. Edita is lordly. Edita is unusual. Edita is equipoised. Lissie is evidential. Lissie is arresting. Lissie is unusual. Lissi is evidential. Lissi is arresting. Lissi is lordly. Sydel is unusual. All unusual people are lordly. If someone is flooded then they are equipoised. If someone is evidential and equipoised then they are arresting. If Edita is equipoised and Edita is evidential then Edita is vexatious. All vexatious, unusual people are arresting. If someone is arresting and unusual then they are evidential. All arresting, unusual people are flooded. All evidential, arresting people are unusual. Lissi is not flooded.", "logic": "\nFlooded(edita)\nArresting(edita)\nLordly(edita)\nUnusual(edita)\nEquipoised(edita)\nEvidential(lissie)\nArresting(lissie)\nUnusual(lissie)\nEvidential(lissi)\nArresting(lissi)\nLordly(lissi)\nUnusual(sydel)\nforall x (Unusual(x) -> Lordly(x))\nforall x (Flooded(x) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Evidential(x) and Equipoised(x) -> Arresting(x))\nEquipoised(edita) and Evidential(edita) -> Vexatious(edita)\nforall x (Vexatious(x) and Unusual(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Arresting(x) and Unusual(x) -> Evidential(x))\nforall x (Arresting(x) and Unusual(x) -> Flooded(x))\nforall x (Evidential(x) and Arresting(x) -> Unusual(x))\n\nnot Flooded(lissi)\n\nEvidential(lissi) and Arresting(lissi) and forall x (Evidential(x) and Arresting(x) -> Unusual(x)) -> therefore Unusual(lissi) Arresting(lissi) and Unusual(lissi) and forall x (Arresting(x) and Unusual(x) -> Flooded(x)) -> therefore Flooded(lissi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Helmuth is leisured. Helmuth is ephemeral. Helmuth is elevated. Helmuth is analogue. Helmuth is puberulent. Ami is encased. Ami is ephemeral. Ami is analogue. Ruthe is encased. Ruthe is ephemeral. Ruthe is elevated. Farra is analogue. All analogue people are elevated. If someone is leisured then they are puberulent. If someone is encased and puberulent then they are ephemeral. If Helmuth is puberulent and Helmuth is encased then Helmuth is propelling. All propelling, analogue people are ephemeral. If someone is ephemeral and analogue then they are encased. All ephemeral, analogue people are leisured. All encased, ephemeral people are analogue. Farra is not leisured.", "logic": "\nLeisured(helmuth)\nEphemeral(helmuth)\nElevated(helmuth)\nAnalogue(helmuth)\nPuberulent(helmuth)\nEncased(ami)\nEphemeral(ami)\nAnalogue(ami)\nEncased(ruthe)\nEphemeral(ruthe)\nElevated(ruthe)\nAnalogue(farra)\nforall x (Analogue(x) -> Elevated(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Puberulent(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nPuberulent(helmuth) and Encased(helmuth) -> Propelling(helmuth)\nforall x (Propelling(x) and Analogue(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and Analogue(x) -> Encased(x))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and Analogue(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) and Ephemeral(x) -> Analogue(x))\n\nnot Leisured(farra)\n\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and Analogue(x) -> Leisured(x)) <- forall x (Encased(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Ephemeral(x)) <- forall x (Leisured(x) -> Puberulent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Elmore is cityfied. Elmore is nary. Elmore is nifty. Elmore is drooping. Elmore is pricey. Gilberte is interwoven. Gilberte is nary. Gilberte is drooping. Noell is interwoven. Noell is nary. Noell is nifty. Garp is drooping. All drooping people are nifty. If someone is cityfied then they are pricey. If someone is interwoven and pricey then they are nary. If Elmore is pricey and Elmore is interwoven then Elmore is unrelaxed. All unrelaxed, drooping people are nary. If someone is nary and drooping then they are interwoven. All nary, drooping people are cityfied. All interwoven, nary people are drooping. Garp is pricey.", "logic": "\nCityfied(elmore)\nNary(elmore)\nNifty(elmore)\nDrooping(elmore)\nPricey(elmore)\nInterwoven(gilberte)\nNary(gilberte)\nDrooping(gilberte)\nInterwoven(noell)\nNary(noell)\nNifty(noell)\nDrooping(garp)\nforall x (Drooping(x) -> Nifty(x))\nforall x (Cityfied(x) -> Pricey(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Pricey(x) -> Nary(x))\nPricey(elmore) and Interwoven(elmore) -> Unrelaxed(elmore)\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) and Drooping(x) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Nary(x) and Drooping(x) -> Interwoven(x))\nforall x (Nary(x) and Drooping(x) -> Cityfied(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Nary(x) -> Drooping(x))\n\nPricey(garp)\n\nforall x (Cityfied(x) -> Pricey(x)) <- forall x (Nary(x) and Drooping(x) -> Cityfied(x)) <- forall x (Interwoven(x) and Pricey(x) -> Nary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Eadie is covalent. Eadie is choked. Eadie is ruddy. Eadie is garlicky. Eadie is narrowed. Teddy is pulmonary. Teddy is choked. Teddy is garlicky. Nissie is pulmonary. Nissie is choked. Nissie is ruddy. Hewie is garlicky. All garlicky people are ruddy. If someone is covalent then they are narrowed. If someone is pulmonary and narrowed then they are choked. If Eadie is narrowed and Eadie is pulmonary then Eadie is bated. All bated, garlicky people are choked. If someone is choked and garlicky then they are pulmonary. All choked, garlicky people are covalent. All pulmonary, choked people are garlicky. Hewie is not choked.", "logic": "\nCovalent(eadie)\nChoked(eadie)\nRuddy(eadie)\nGarlicky(eadie)\nNarrowed(eadie)\nPulmonary(teddy)\nChoked(teddy)\nGarlicky(teddy)\nPulmonary(nissie)\nChoked(nissie)\nRuddy(nissie)\nGarlicky(hewie)\nforall x (Garlicky(x) -> Ruddy(x))\nforall x (Covalent(x) -> Narrowed(x))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Narrowed(x) -> Choked(x))\nNarrowed(eadie) and Pulmonary(eadie) -> Bated(eadie)\nforall x (Bated(x) and Garlicky(x) -> Choked(x))\nforall x (Choked(x) and Garlicky(x) -> Pulmonary(x))\nforall x (Choked(x) and Garlicky(x) -> Covalent(x))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Choked(x) -> Garlicky(x))\n\nnot Choked(hewie)\n\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Narrowed(x) -> Choked(x)) <- forall x (Choked(x) and Garlicky(x) -> Pulmonary(x)) <- forall x (Bated(x) and Garlicky(x) -> Choked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Ethelbert is ghastly. Ethelbert is adiabatic. Ethelbert is romance. Ethelbert is metaphoric. Ethelbert is batty. Shanie is broadband. Shanie is adiabatic. Shanie is metaphoric. Valentine is broadband. Valentine is adiabatic. Valentine is romance. Trista is metaphoric. All metaphoric people are romance. If someone is ghastly then they are batty. If someone is broadband and batty then they are adiabatic. If Ethelbert is batty and Ethelbert is broadband then Ethelbert is caruncular. All caruncular, metaphoric people are adiabatic. If someone is adiabatic and metaphoric then they are broadband. All adiabatic, metaphoric people are ghastly. All broadband, adiabatic people are metaphoric. Valentine is caruncular.", "logic": "\nGhastly(ethelbert)\nAdiabatic(ethelbert)\nRomance(ethelbert)\nMetaphoric(ethelbert)\nBatty(ethelbert)\nBroadband(shanie)\nAdiabatic(shanie)\nMetaphoric(shanie)\nBroadband(valentine)\nAdiabatic(valentine)\nRomance(valentine)\nMetaphoric(trista)\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Ghastly(x) -> Batty(x))\nforall x (Broadband(x) and Batty(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nBatty(ethelbert) and Broadband(ethelbert) -> Caruncular(ethelbert)\nforall x (Caruncular(x) and Metaphoric(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) and Metaphoric(x) -> Broadband(x))\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) and Metaphoric(x) -> Ghastly(x))\nforall x (Broadband(x) and Adiabatic(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\n\nCaruncular(valentine)\n\nCaruncular(valentine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Lori is daisylike. Lori is womanly. Lori is argentic. Lori is soaked. Lori is confounded. Row is mammary. Row is womanly. Row is soaked. Charlena is mammary. Charlena is womanly. Charlena is argentic. Tharen is soaked. All soaked people are argentic. If someone is daisylike then they are confounded. If someone is mammary and confounded then they are womanly. If Lori is confounded and Lori is mammary then Lori is motored. All motored, soaked people are womanly. If someone is womanly and soaked then they are mammary. All womanly, soaked people are daisylike. All mammary, womanly people are soaked. Tharen is not motored.", "logic": "\nDaisylike(lori)\nWomanly(lori)\nArgentic(lori)\nSoaked(lori)\nConfounded(lori)\nMammary(row)\nWomanly(row)\nSoaked(row)\nMammary(charlena)\nWomanly(charlena)\nArgentic(charlena)\nSoaked(tharen)\nforall x (Soaked(x) -> Argentic(x))\nforall x (Daisylike(x) -> Confounded(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) and Confounded(x) -> Womanly(x))\nConfounded(lori) and Mammary(lori) -> Motored(lori)\nforall x (Motored(x) and Soaked(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Soaked(x) -> Mammary(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Soaked(x) -> Daisylike(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) and Womanly(x) -> Soaked(x))\n\nnot Motored(tharen)\n\nnot Motored(tharen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Herbert is conjugate. Herbert is eponymous. Herbert is great. Herbert is stripped. Herbert is drumhead. Clair is orthodox. Clair is eponymous. Clair is stripped. Gilburt is orthodox. Gilburt is eponymous. Gilburt is great. Reta is stripped. All stripped people are great. If someone is conjugate then they are drumhead. If someone is orthodox and drumhead then they are eponymous. If Herbert is drumhead and Herbert is orthodox then Herbert is fouled. All fouled, stripped people are eponymous. If someone is eponymous and stripped then they are orthodox. All eponymous, stripped people are conjugate. All orthodox, eponymous people are stripped. Clair is fouled.", "logic": "\nConjugate(herbert)\nEponymous(herbert)\nGreat(herbert)\nStripped(herbert)\nDrumhead(herbert)\nOrthodox(clair)\nEponymous(clair)\nStripped(clair)\nOrthodox(gilburt)\nEponymous(gilburt)\nGreat(gilburt)\nStripped(reta)\nforall x (Stripped(x) -> Great(x))\nforall x (Conjugate(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nforall x (Orthodox(x) and Drumhead(x) -> Eponymous(x))\nDrumhead(herbert) and Orthodox(herbert) -> Fouled(herbert)\nforall x (Fouled(x) and Stripped(x) -> Eponymous(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) and Stripped(x) -> Orthodox(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) and Stripped(x) -> Conjugate(x))\nforall x (Orthodox(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Stripped(x))\n\nFouled(clair)\n\nFouled(clair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1210"} {"premises": "Wilfred is burlesque. If something is neritic then it is shining. If Wilfred is shivering then Wilfred is not poltroon. Round things are burlesque. If something is burlesque then it is shivering. If something is shivering and burlesque then it is protrusile. If something is stained and not burlesque then it is not protrusile. If something is shining and protrusile then it is not poltroon. If something is shivering and not protrusile then it is not poltroon. Wilfred is burlesque.", "logic": "\nBurlesque(wilfred)\nforall x (Neritic(x) -> Shining(x))\nShivering(wilfred) -> not Poltroon(wilfred)\nforall x (Shining(x) -> Burlesque(x))\nforall x (Burlesque(x) -> Shivering(x))\nforall x (Shivering(x) and Burlesque(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Stained(x) and not Burlesque(x) -> not Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Shining(x) and Protrusile(x) -> not Poltroon(x))\nforall x (Shivering(x) and not Protrusile(x) -> not Poltroon(x))\n\nBurlesque(wilfred)\n\ntherefore Burlesque(wilfred)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "Elyssa is disputed. If something is fuscous then it is fluvial. If Elyssa is dimorphic then Elyssa is not faucal. Round things are disputed. If something is disputed then it is dimorphic. If something is dimorphic and disputed then it is diastolic. If something is sulfurous and not disputed then it is not diastolic. If something is fluvial and diastolic then it is not faucal. If something is dimorphic and not diastolic then it is not faucal. Elyssa is not disputed.", "logic": "\nDisputed(elyssa)\nforall x (Fuscous(x) -> Fluvial(x))\nDimorphic(elyssa) -> not Faucal(elyssa)\nforall x (Fluvial(x) -> Disputed(x))\nforall x (Disputed(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and Disputed(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) and not Disputed(x) -> not Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Fluvial(x) and Diastolic(x) -> not Faucal(x))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and not Diastolic(x) -> not Faucal(x))\n\nnot Disputed(elyssa)\n\ntherefore Disputed(elyssa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "Aditya is bacchic. If something is showy then it is juicy. If Aditya is humdrum then Aditya is not insatiable. Round things are bacchic. If something is bacchic then it is humdrum. If something is humdrum and bacchic then it is unscathed. If something is vulcanised and not bacchic then it is not unscathed. If something is juicy and unscathed then it is not insatiable. If something is humdrum and not unscathed then it is not insatiable. Aditya is humdrum.", "logic": "\nBacchic(aditya)\nforall x (Showy(x) -> Juicy(x))\nHumdrum(aditya) -> not Insatiable(aditya)\nforall x (Juicy(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) -> Humdrum(x))\nforall x (Humdrum(x) and Bacchic(x) -> Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) and not Bacchic(x) -> not Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Juicy(x) and Unscathed(x) -> not Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Humdrum(x) and not Unscathed(x) -> not Insatiable(x))\n\nHumdrum(aditya)\n\nBacchic(aditya) and forall x (Bacchic(x) -> Humdrum(x)) -> therefore Humdrum(aditya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "Othello is hideous. If something is hellenic then it is unawakened. If Othello is brachiate then Othello is not incendiary. Round things are hideous. If something is hideous then it is brachiate. If something is brachiate and hideous then it is fossilized. If something is homeward and not hideous then it is not fossilized. If something is unawakened and fossilized then it is not incendiary. If something is brachiate and not fossilized then it is not incendiary. Othello is not brachiate.", "logic": "\nHideous(othello)\nforall x (Hellenic(x) -> Unawakened(x))\nBrachiate(othello) -> not Incendiary(othello)\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Hideous(x))\nforall x (Hideous(x) -> Brachiate(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and Hideous(x) -> Fossilized(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) and not Hideous(x) -> not Fossilized(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and Fossilized(x) -> not Incendiary(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and not Fossilized(x) -> not Incendiary(x))\n\nnot Brachiate(othello)\n\nHideous(othello) and forall x (Hideous(x) -> Brachiate(x)) -> therefore Brachiate(othello)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "Wyn is uninitiate. If something is meddlesome then it is quechuan. If Wyn is chaste then Wyn is not unleavened. Round things are uninitiate. If something is uninitiate then it is chaste. If something is chaste and uninitiate then it is postwar. If something is histrionic and not uninitiate then it is not postwar. If something is quechuan and postwar then it is not unleavened. If something is chaste and not postwar then it is not unleavened. Wyn is postwar.", "logic": "\nUninitiate(wyn)\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) -> Quechuan(x))\nChaste(wyn) -> not Unleavened(wyn)\nforall x (Quechuan(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Chaste(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Postwar(x))\nforall x (Histrionic(x) and not Uninitiate(x) -> not Postwar(x))\nforall x (Quechuan(x) and Postwar(x) -> not Unleavened(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) and not Postwar(x) -> not Unleavened(x))\n\nPostwar(wyn)\n\nUninitiate(wyn) and forall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Chaste(x)) -> therefore Chaste(wyn) Chaste(wyn) and Uninitiate(wyn) and forall x (Chaste(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Postwar(x)) -> therefore Postwar(wyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "Clea is tyrannous. If something is sapiential then it is neurologic. If Clea is rodlike then Clea is not emended. Round things are tyrannous. If something is tyrannous then it is rodlike. If something is rodlike and tyrannous then it is fleshly. If something is testy and not tyrannous then it is not fleshly. If something is neurologic and fleshly then it is not emended. If something is rodlike and not fleshly then it is not emended. Clea is emended.", "logic": "\nTyrannous(clea)\nforall x (Sapiential(x) -> Neurologic(x))\nRodlike(clea) -> not Emended(clea)\nforall x (Neurologic(x) -> Tyrannous(x))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Rodlike(x))\nforall x (Rodlike(x) and Tyrannous(x) -> Fleshly(x))\nforall x (Testy(x) and not Tyrannous(x) -> not Fleshly(x))\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Fleshly(x) -> not Emended(x))\nforall x (Rodlike(x) and not Fleshly(x) -> not Emended(x))\n\nEmended(clea)\n\nTyrannous(clea) and forall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Rodlike(x)) -> therefore Rodlike(clea) Rodlike(clea) and Rodlike(clea) -> not Emended(clea) -> therefore not Emended(clea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "Gretchen is undefined. If something is clotted then it is tenable. If Gretchen is toughened then Gretchen is not gravelly. Round things are undefined. If something is undefined then it is toughened. If something is toughened and undefined then it is xliv. If something is anicteric and not undefined then it is not xliv. If something is tenable and xliv then it is not gravelly. If something is toughened and not xliv then it is not gravelly. Gretchen is not tenable.", "logic": "\nUndefined(gretchen)\nforall x (Clotted(x) -> Tenable(x))\nToughened(gretchen) -> not Gravelly(gretchen)\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Undefined(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) -> Toughened(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and Undefined(x) -> Xliv(x))\nforall x (Anicteric(x) and not Undefined(x) -> not Xliv(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) and Xliv(x) -> not Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and not Xliv(x) -> not Gravelly(x))\n\nnot Tenable(gretchen)\n\nforall x (Clotted(x) -> Tenable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "Jilleen is unreal. If something is acherontic then it is numeric. If Jilleen is pulpy then Jilleen is not chicken. Round things are unreal. If something is unreal then it is pulpy. If something is pulpy and unreal then it is stabilized. If something is hortatory and not unreal then it is not stabilized. If something is numeric and stabilized then it is not chicken. If something is pulpy and not stabilized then it is not chicken. Jilleen is hortatory.", "logic": "\nUnreal(jilleen)\nforall x (Acherontic(x) -> Numeric(x))\nPulpy(jilleen) -> not Chicken(jilleen)\nforall x (Numeric(x) -> Unreal(x))\nforall x (Unreal(x) -> Pulpy(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and Unreal(x) -> Stabilized(x))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) and not Unreal(x) -> not Stabilized(x))\nforall x (Numeric(x) and Stabilized(x) -> not Chicken(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and not Stabilized(x) -> not Chicken(x))\n\nHortatory(jilleen)\n\nHortatory(jilleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1639"} {"premises": "The manish is esurient. The manish is not southbound. The manish is not dread. The manish is windswept. The manish is beastly. The manish dishonor the elena. The manish channelise the elena. The manish curtain the elena. The elena is esurient. The elena is southbound. The elena is not dread. The elena is windswept. The elena is beastly. The elena dishonor the manish. The elena channelise the manish. The elena curtain the manish. If the elena is southbound then the elena curtain the manish. If something dishonor the elena then the elena channelise the manish. If the manish dishonor the elena and the elena does not like the manish then the elena channelise the manish. If something is dread and it dishonor the elena then it curtain the manish. If something channelise the manish then it curtain the manish. If something curtain the elena then it channelise the manish. If something curtain the manish then it channelise the manish. If something is southbound and it channelise the elena then it curtain the elena. The manish curtain the elena.", "logic": "\nEsurient(manish)\nnot Southbound(manish)\nnot Dread(manish)\nWindswept(manish)\nBeastly(manish)\nDishonor(manish, elena)\nChannelise(manish, elena)\nCurtain(manish, elena)\nEsurient(elena)\nSouthbound(elena)\nnot Dread(elena)\nWindswept(elena)\nBeastly(elena)\nDishonor(elena, manish)\nChannelise(elena, manish)\nCurtain(elena, manish)\nSouthbound(elena) -> Curtain(elena, manish)\nforall x (Dishonor(x, elena) -> Channelise(elena, manish))\nDishonor(manish, elena) and not Dishonor(elena, manish) -> Channelise(elena, manish)\nforall x (Dread(x) and Dishonor(x, elena) -> Curtain(x, manish))\nforall x (Channelise(x, manish) -> Curtain(x, manish))\nforall x (Curtain(x, elena) -> Channelise(x, manish))\nforall x (Curtain(x, manish) -> Channelise(x, manish))\nforall x (Southbound(x) and Channelise(x, elena) -> Curtain(x, elena))\n\nCurtain(manish, elena)\n\ntherefore Curtain(manish, elena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The ellene is appealable. The ellene is not reprobate. The ellene is not telephonic. The ellene is inspiring. The ellene is aesthetic. The ellene think the aleece. The ellene languish the aleece. The ellene surrender the aleece. The aleece is appealable. The aleece is reprobate. The aleece is not telephonic. The aleece is inspiring. The aleece is aesthetic. The aleece think the ellene. The aleece languish the ellene. The aleece surrender the ellene. If the aleece is reprobate then the aleece surrender the ellene. If something think the aleece then the aleece languish the ellene. If the ellene think the aleece and the aleece does not like the ellene then the aleece languish the ellene. If something is telephonic and it think the aleece then it surrender the ellene. If something languish the ellene then it surrender the ellene. If something surrender the aleece then it languish the ellene. If something surrender the ellene then it languish the ellene. If something is reprobate and it languish the aleece then it surrender the aleece. The ellene is not aesthetic.", "logic": "\nAppealable(ellene)\nnot Reprobate(ellene)\nnot Telephonic(ellene)\nInspiring(ellene)\nAesthetic(ellene)\nThink(ellene, aleece)\nLanguish(ellene, aleece)\nSurrender(ellene, aleece)\nAppealable(aleece)\nReprobate(aleece)\nnot Telephonic(aleece)\nInspiring(aleece)\nAesthetic(aleece)\nThink(aleece, ellene)\nLanguish(aleece, ellene)\nSurrender(aleece, ellene)\nReprobate(aleece) -> Surrender(aleece, ellene)\nforall x (Think(x, aleece) -> Languish(aleece, ellene))\nThink(ellene, aleece) and not Think(aleece, ellene) -> Languish(aleece, ellene)\nforall x (Telephonic(x) and Think(x, aleece) -> Surrender(x, ellene))\nforall x (Languish(x, ellene) -> Surrender(x, ellene))\nforall x (Surrender(x, aleece) -> Languish(x, ellene))\nforall x (Surrender(x, ellene) -> Languish(x, ellene))\nforall x (Reprobate(x) and Languish(x, aleece) -> Surrender(x, aleece))\n\nnot Aesthetic(ellene)\n\ntherefore Aesthetic(ellene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The dan is reclaimed. The dan is not appointive. The dan is not ariled. The dan is beholden. The dan is nonnatural. The dan outguess the jervis. The dan elaborate the jervis. The dan salvage the jervis. The jervis is reclaimed. The jervis is appointive. The jervis is not ariled. The jervis is beholden. The jervis is nonnatural. The jervis outguess the dan. The jervis elaborate the dan. The jervis salvage the dan. If the jervis is appointive then the jervis salvage the dan. If something outguess the jervis then the jervis elaborate the dan. If the dan outguess the jervis and the jervis does not like the dan then the jervis elaborate the dan. If something is ariled and it outguess the jervis then it salvage the dan. If something elaborate the dan then it salvage the dan. If something salvage the jervis then it elaborate the dan. If something salvage the dan then it elaborate the dan. If something is appointive and it elaborate the jervis then it salvage the jervis. The dan elaborate the dan.", "logic": "\nReclaimed(dan)\nnot Appointive(dan)\nnot Ariled(dan)\nBeholden(dan)\nNonnatural(dan)\nOutguess(dan, jervis)\nElaborate(dan, jervis)\nSalvage(dan, jervis)\nReclaimed(jervis)\nAppointive(jervis)\nnot Ariled(jervis)\nBeholden(jervis)\nNonnatural(jervis)\nOutguess(jervis, dan)\nElaborate(jervis, dan)\nSalvage(jervis, dan)\nAppointive(jervis) -> Salvage(jervis, dan)\nforall x (Outguess(x, jervis) -> Elaborate(jervis, dan))\nOutguess(dan, jervis) and not Outguess(jervis, dan) -> Elaborate(jervis, dan)\nforall x (Ariled(x) and Outguess(x, jervis) -> Salvage(x, dan))\nforall x (Elaborate(x, dan) -> Salvage(x, dan))\nforall x (Salvage(x, jervis) -> Elaborate(x, dan))\nforall x (Salvage(x, dan) -> Elaborate(x, dan))\nforall x (Appointive(x) and Elaborate(x, jervis) -> Salvage(x, jervis))\n\nElaborate(dan, dan)\n\nSalvage(dan, jervis) and forall x (Salvage(x, jervis) -> Elaborate(x, dan)) -> therefore Elaborate(dan, dan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The dode is dolomitic. The dode is not unengaged. The dode is not bribable. The dode is thirtieth. The dode is telephonic. The dode strew the elliott. The dode undergo the elliott. The dode undermine the elliott. The elliott is dolomitic. The elliott is unengaged. The elliott is not bribable. The elliott is thirtieth. The elliott is telephonic. The elliott strew the dode. The elliott undergo the dode. The elliott undermine the dode. If the elliott is unengaged then the elliott undermine the dode. If something strew the elliott then the elliott undergo the dode. If the dode strew the elliott and the elliott does not like the dode then the elliott undergo the dode. If something is bribable and it strew the elliott then it undermine the dode. If something undergo the dode then it undermine the dode. If something undermine the elliott then it undergo the dode. If something undermine the dode then it undergo the dode. If something is unengaged and it undergo the elliott then it undermine the elliott. The dode does not see the dode.", "logic": "\nDolomitic(dode)\nnot Unengaged(dode)\nnot Bribable(dode)\nThirtieth(dode)\nTelephonic(dode)\nStrew(dode, elliott)\nUndergo(dode, elliott)\nUndermine(dode, elliott)\nDolomitic(elliott)\nUnengaged(elliott)\nnot Bribable(elliott)\nThirtieth(elliott)\nTelephonic(elliott)\nStrew(elliott, dode)\nUndergo(elliott, dode)\nUndermine(elliott, dode)\nUnengaged(elliott) -> Undermine(elliott, dode)\nforall x (Strew(x, elliott) -> Undergo(elliott, dode))\nStrew(dode, elliott) and not Strew(elliott, dode) -> Undergo(elliott, dode)\nforall x (Bribable(x) and Strew(x, elliott) -> Undermine(x, dode))\nforall x (Undergo(x, dode) -> Undermine(x, dode))\nforall x (Undermine(x, elliott) -> Undergo(x, dode))\nforall x (Undermine(x, dode) -> Undergo(x, dode))\nforall x (Unengaged(x) and Undergo(x, elliott) -> Undermine(x, elliott))\n\nnot Undergo(dode, dode)\n\nUndermine(dode, elliott) and forall x (Undermine(x, elliott) -> Undergo(x, dode)) -> therefore Undergo(dode, dode)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The rudolfo is gelatinous. The rudolfo is not killing. The rudolfo is not corruptive. The rudolfo is puranic. The rudolfo is truculent. The rudolfo prize the randolf. The rudolfo shelve the randolf. The rudolfo omen the randolf. The randolf is gelatinous. The randolf is killing. The randolf is not corruptive. The randolf is puranic. The randolf is truculent. The randolf prize the rudolfo. The randolf shelve the rudolfo. The randolf omen the rudolfo. If the randolf is killing then the randolf omen the rudolfo. If something prize the randolf then the randolf shelve the rudolfo. If the rudolfo prize the randolf and the randolf does not like the rudolfo then the randolf shelve the rudolfo. If something is corruptive and it prize the randolf then it omen the rudolfo. If something shelve the rudolfo then it omen the rudolfo. If something omen the randolf then it shelve the rudolfo. If something omen the rudolfo then it shelve the rudolfo. If something is killing and it shelve the randolf then it omen the randolf. The rudolfo omen the rudolfo.", "logic": "\nGelatinous(rudolfo)\nnot Killing(rudolfo)\nnot Corruptive(rudolfo)\nPuranic(rudolfo)\nTruculent(rudolfo)\nPrize(rudolfo, randolf)\nShelve(rudolfo, randolf)\nOmen(rudolfo, randolf)\nGelatinous(randolf)\nKilling(randolf)\nnot Corruptive(randolf)\nPuranic(randolf)\nTruculent(randolf)\nPrize(randolf, rudolfo)\nShelve(randolf, rudolfo)\nOmen(randolf, rudolfo)\nKilling(randolf) -> Omen(randolf, rudolfo)\nforall x (Prize(x, randolf) -> Shelve(randolf, rudolfo))\nPrize(rudolfo, randolf) and not Prize(randolf, rudolfo) -> Shelve(randolf, rudolfo)\nforall x (Corruptive(x) and Prize(x, randolf) -> Omen(x, rudolfo))\nforall x (Shelve(x, rudolfo) -> Omen(x, rudolfo))\nforall x (Omen(x, randolf) -> Shelve(x, rudolfo))\nforall x (Omen(x, rudolfo) -> Shelve(x, rudolfo))\nforall x (Killing(x) and Shelve(x, randolf) -> Omen(x, randolf))\n\nOmen(rudolfo, rudolfo)\n\nOmen(rudolfo, randolf) and forall x (Omen(x, randolf) -> Shelve(x, rudolfo)) -> therefore Shelve(rudolfo, rudolfo) Shelve(rudolfo, rudolfo) and forall x (Shelve(x, rudolfo) -> Omen(x, rudolfo)) -> therefore Omen(rudolfo, rudolfo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The eloise is alsatian. The eloise is not chordate. The eloise is not remedial. The eloise is saline. The eloise is whispering. The eloise envenom the briney. The eloise solemnize the briney. The eloise boot the briney. The briney is alsatian. The briney is chordate. The briney is not remedial. The briney is saline. The briney is whispering. The briney envenom the eloise. The briney solemnize the eloise. The briney boot the eloise. If the briney is chordate then the briney boot the eloise. If something envenom the briney then the briney solemnize the eloise. If the eloise envenom the briney and the briney does not like the eloise then the briney solemnize the eloise. If something is remedial and it envenom the briney then it boot the eloise. If something solemnize the eloise then it boot the eloise. If something boot the briney then it solemnize the eloise. If something boot the eloise then it solemnize the eloise. If something is chordate and it solemnize the briney then it boot the briney. The eloise does not visit the eloise.", "logic": "\nAlsatian(eloise)\nnot Chordate(eloise)\nnot Remedial(eloise)\nSaline(eloise)\nWhispering(eloise)\nEnvenom(eloise, briney)\nSolemnize(eloise, briney)\nBoot(eloise, briney)\nAlsatian(briney)\nChordate(briney)\nnot Remedial(briney)\nSaline(briney)\nWhispering(briney)\nEnvenom(briney, eloise)\nSolemnize(briney, eloise)\nBoot(briney, eloise)\nChordate(briney) -> Boot(briney, eloise)\nforall x (Envenom(x, briney) -> Solemnize(briney, eloise))\nEnvenom(eloise, briney) and not Envenom(briney, eloise) -> Solemnize(briney, eloise)\nforall x (Remedial(x) and Envenom(x, briney) -> Boot(x, eloise))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, eloise) -> Boot(x, eloise))\nforall x (Boot(x, briney) -> Solemnize(x, eloise))\nforall x (Boot(x, eloise) -> Solemnize(x, eloise))\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Solemnize(x, briney) -> Boot(x, briney))\n\nnot Boot(eloise, eloise)\n\nBoot(eloise, briney) and forall x (Boot(x, briney) -> Solemnize(x, eloise)) -> therefore Solemnize(eloise, eloise) Solemnize(eloise, eloise) and forall x (Solemnize(x, eloise) -> Boot(x, eloise)) -> therefore Boot(eloise, eloise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The justis is aroused. The justis is not lettered. The justis is not factorial. The justis is undutiful. The justis is alert. The justis swinge the celinka. The justis phrase the celinka. The justis japan the celinka. The celinka is aroused. The celinka is lettered. The celinka is not factorial. The celinka is undutiful. The celinka is alert. The celinka swinge the justis. The celinka phrase the justis. The celinka japan the justis. If the celinka is lettered then the celinka japan the justis. If something swinge the celinka then the celinka phrase the justis. If the justis swinge the celinka and the celinka does not like the justis then the celinka phrase the justis. If something is factorial and it swinge the celinka then it japan the justis. If something phrase the justis then it japan the justis. If something japan the celinka then it phrase the justis. If something japan the justis then it phrase the justis. If something is lettered and it phrase the celinka then it japan the celinka. The celinka does not visit the celinka.", "logic": "\nAroused(justis)\nnot Lettered(justis)\nnot Factorial(justis)\nUndutiful(justis)\nAlert(justis)\nSwinge(justis, celinka)\nPhrase(justis, celinka)\nJapan(justis, celinka)\nAroused(celinka)\nLettered(celinka)\nnot Factorial(celinka)\nUndutiful(celinka)\nAlert(celinka)\nSwinge(celinka, justis)\nPhrase(celinka, justis)\nJapan(celinka, justis)\nLettered(celinka) -> Japan(celinka, justis)\nforall x (Swinge(x, celinka) -> Phrase(celinka, justis))\nSwinge(justis, celinka) and not Swinge(celinka, justis) -> Phrase(celinka, justis)\nforall x (Factorial(x) and Swinge(x, celinka) -> Japan(x, justis))\nforall x (Phrase(x, justis) -> Japan(x, justis))\nforall x (Japan(x, celinka) -> Phrase(x, justis))\nforall x (Japan(x, justis) -> Phrase(x, justis))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Phrase(x, celinka) -> Japan(x, celinka))\n\nnot Japan(celinka, celinka)\n\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Phrase(x, celinka) -> Japan(x, celinka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The scotty is armlike. The scotty is not brag. The scotty is not plaguey. The scotty is creepy. The scotty is aberdonian. The scotty uncurl the baily. The scotty coif the baily. The scotty unwire the baily. The baily is armlike. The baily is brag. The baily is not plaguey. The baily is creepy. The baily is aberdonian. The baily uncurl the scotty. The baily coif the scotty. The baily unwire the scotty. If the baily is brag then the baily unwire the scotty. If something uncurl the baily then the baily coif the scotty. If the scotty uncurl the baily and the baily does not like the scotty then the baily coif the scotty. If something is plaguey and it uncurl the baily then it unwire the scotty. If something coif the scotty then it unwire the scotty. If something unwire the baily then it coif the scotty. If something unwire the scotty then it coif the scotty. If something is brag and it coif the baily then it unwire the baily. The baily uncurl the baily.", "logic": "\nArmlike(scotty)\nnot Brag(scotty)\nnot Plaguey(scotty)\nCreepy(scotty)\nAberdonian(scotty)\nUncurl(scotty, baily)\nCoif(scotty, baily)\nUnwire(scotty, baily)\nArmlike(baily)\nBrag(baily)\nnot Plaguey(baily)\nCreepy(baily)\nAberdonian(baily)\nUncurl(baily, scotty)\nCoif(baily, scotty)\nUnwire(baily, scotty)\nBrag(baily) -> Unwire(baily, scotty)\nforall x (Uncurl(x, baily) -> Coif(baily, scotty))\nUncurl(scotty, baily) and not Uncurl(baily, scotty) -> Coif(baily, scotty)\nforall x (Plaguey(x) and Uncurl(x, baily) -> Unwire(x, scotty))\nforall x (Coif(x, scotty) -> Unwire(x, scotty))\nforall x (Unwire(x, baily) -> Coif(x, scotty))\nforall x (Unwire(x, scotty) -> Coif(x, scotty))\nforall x (Brag(x) and Coif(x, baily) -> Unwire(x, baily))\n\nUncurl(baily, baily)\n\nUncurl(baily, baily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The sharna is geological. The sharna is not supporting. The sharna is not endogamous. The sharna is rheumatic. The sharna is dominant. The sharna lexicalize the pauline. The sharna liberalize the pauline. The sharna schmooze the pauline. The pauline is geological. The pauline is supporting. The pauline is not endogamous. The pauline is rheumatic. The pauline is dominant. The pauline lexicalize the sharna. The pauline liberalize the sharna. The pauline schmooze the sharna. If the pauline is supporting then the pauline schmooze the sharna. If something lexicalize the pauline then the pauline liberalize the sharna. If the sharna lexicalize the pauline and the pauline does not like the sharna then the pauline liberalize the sharna. If something is endogamous and it lexicalize the pauline then it schmooze the sharna. If something liberalize the sharna then it schmooze the sharna. If something schmooze the pauline then it liberalize the sharna. If something schmooze the sharna then it liberalize the sharna. If something is supporting and it liberalize the pauline then it schmooze the pauline. The pauline does not see the pauline.", "logic": "\nGeological(sharna)\nnot Supporting(sharna)\nnot Endogamous(sharna)\nRheumatic(sharna)\nDominant(sharna)\nLexicalize(sharna, pauline)\nLiberalize(sharna, pauline)\nSchmooze(sharna, pauline)\nGeological(pauline)\nSupporting(pauline)\nnot Endogamous(pauline)\nRheumatic(pauline)\nDominant(pauline)\nLexicalize(pauline, sharna)\nLiberalize(pauline, sharna)\nSchmooze(pauline, sharna)\nSupporting(pauline) -> Schmooze(pauline, sharna)\nforall x (Lexicalize(x, pauline) -> Liberalize(pauline, sharna))\nLexicalize(sharna, pauline) and not Lexicalize(pauline, sharna) -> Liberalize(pauline, sharna)\nforall x (Endogamous(x) and Lexicalize(x, pauline) -> Schmooze(x, sharna))\nforall x (Liberalize(x, sharna) -> Schmooze(x, sharna))\nforall x (Schmooze(x, pauline) -> Liberalize(x, sharna))\nforall x (Schmooze(x, sharna) -> Liberalize(x, sharna))\nforall x (Supporting(x) and Liberalize(x, pauline) -> Schmooze(x, pauline))\n\nnot Liberalize(pauline, pauline)\n\nnot Liberalize(pauline, pauline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The damaris is bacterial. The damaris is not arable. The damaris is not chic. The damaris is steadied. The damaris is unlawful. The damaris concur the ileana. The damaris grapple the ileana. The damaris direct the ileana. The ileana is bacterial. The ileana is arable. The ileana is not chic. The ileana is steadied. The ileana is unlawful. The ileana concur the damaris. The ileana grapple the damaris. The ileana direct the damaris. If the ileana is arable then the ileana direct the damaris. If something concur the ileana then the ileana grapple the damaris. If the damaris concur the ileana and the ileana does not like the damaris then the ileana grapple the damaris. If something is chic and it concur the ileana then it direct the damaris. If something grapple the damaris then it direct the damaris. If something direct the ileana then it grapple the damaris. If something direct the damaris then it grapple the damaris. If something is arable and it grapple the ileana then it direct the ileana. The damaris concur the damaris.", "logic": "\nBacterial(damaris)\nnot Arable(damaris)\nnot Chic(damaris)\nSteadied(damaris)\nUnlawful(damaris)\nConcur(damaris, ileana)\nGrapple(damaris, ileana)\nDirect(damaris, ileana)\nBacterial(ileana)\nArable(ileana)\nnot Chic(ileana)\nSteadied(ileana)\nUnlawful(ileana)\nConcur(ileana, damaris)\nGrapple(ileana, damaris)\nDirect(ileana, damaris)\nArable(ileana) -> Direct(ileana, damaris)\nforall x (Concur(x, ileana) -> Grapple(ileana, damaris))\nConcur(damaris, ileana) and not Concur(ileana, damaris) -> Grapple(ileana, damaris)\nforall x (Chic(x) and Concur(x, ileana) -> Direct(x, damaris))\nforall x (Grapple(x, damaris) -> Direct(x, damaris))\nforall x (Direct(x, ileana) -> Grapple(x, damaris))\nforall x (Direct(x, damaris) -> Grapple(x, damaris))\nforall x (Arable(x) and Grapple(x, ileana) -> Direct(x, ileana))\n\nConcur(damaris, damaris)\n\nConcur(damaris, damaris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Ruddie is fiscal. Ruddie is not adoptive. Fairfax is paralyzed. Fairfax is fiscal. Fairfax is witching. Fairfax is adoptive. Ashlen is lame. If someone is distinct and not adoptive then they are not paralyzed. All lame people are lentiform. Blue people are lame. Fairfax is fiscal.", "logic": "\nFiscal(ruddie)\nnot Adoptive(ruddie)\nParalyzed(fairfax)\nFiscal(fairfax)\nWitching(fairfax)\nAdoptive(fairfax)\nLame(ashlen)\nforall x (Distinct(x) and not Adoptive(x) -> not Paralyzed(x))\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> Lame(x))\n\nFiscal(fairfax)\n\ntherefore Fiscal(fairfax)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Fanny is sandlike. Fanny is not agonistic. Cele is boneless. Cele is sandlike. Cele is wailful. Cele is agonistic. Travis is inapt. If someone is near and not agonistic then they are not boneless. All inapt people are pinnate. Blue people are inapt. Cele is not wailful.", "logic": "\nSandlike(fanny)\nnot Agonistic(fanny)\nBoneless(cele)\nSandlike(cele)\nWailful(cele)\nAgonistic(cele)\nInapt(travis)\nforall x (Near(x) and not Agonistic(x) -> not Boneless(x))\nforall x (Inapt(x) -> Pinnate(x))\nforall x (Boneless(x) -> Inapt(x))\n\nnot Wailful(cele)\n\ntherefore Wailful(cele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Darla is inguinal. Darla is not iambic. Gabbey is chaetal. Gabbey is inguinal. Gabbey is browned. Gabbey is iambic. Elmira is seafaring. If someone is slithery and not iambic then they are not chaetal. All seafaring people are rearing. Blue people are seafaring. Gabbey is seafaring.", "logic": "\nInguinal(darla)\nnot Iambic(darla)\nChaetal(gabbey)\nInguinal(gabbey)\nBrowned(gabbey)\nIambic(gabbey)\nSeafaring(elmira)\nforall x (Slithery(x) and not Iambic(x) -> not Chaetal(x))\nforall x (Seafaring(x) -> Rearing(x))\nforall x (Chaetal(x) -> Seafaring(x))\n\nSeafaring(gabbey)\n\nChaetal(gabbey) and forall x (Chaetal(x) -> Seafaring(x)) -> therefore Seafaring(gabbey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Collette is downright. Collette is not degrading. Marylin is shivering. Marylin is downright. Marylin is impolite. Marylin is degrading. Nisa is unlucky. If someone is cardinal and not degrading then they are not shivering. All unlucky people are overdue. Blue people are unlucky. Nisa is not overdue.", "logic": "\nDownright(collette)\nnot Degrading(collette)\nShivering(marylin)\nDownright(marylin)\nImpolite(marylin)\nDegrading(marylin)\nUnlucky(nisa)\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and not Degrading(x) -> not Shivering(x))\nforall x (Unlucky(x) -> Overdue(x))\nforall x (Shivering(x) -> Unlucky(x))\n\nnot Overdue(nisa)\n\nUnlucky(nisa) and forall x (Unlucky(x) -> Overdue(x)) -> therefore Overdue(nisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Elsbeth is abashed. Elsbeth is not kaput. Austina is antisocial. Austina is abashed. Austina is leisured. Austina is kaput. Silvie is allantoid. If someone is lethargic and not kaput then they are not antisocial. All allantoid people are pantheist. Blue people are allantoid. Austina is pantheist.", "logic": "\nAbashed(elsbeth)\nnot Kaput(elsbeth)\nAntisocial(austina)\nAbashed(austina)\nLeisured(austina)\nKaput(austina)\nAllantoid(silvie)\nforall x (Lethargic(x) and not Kaput(x) -> not Antisocial(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Antisocial(x) -> Allantoid(x))\n\nPantheist(austina)\n\nAntisocial(austina) and forall x (Antisocial(x) -> Allantoid(x)) -> therefore Allantoid(austina) Allantoid(austina) and forall x (Allantoid(x) -> Pantheist(x)) -> therefore Pantheist(austina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Dieter is poorly. Dieter is not favorable. Nevil is sinless. Nevil is poorly. Nevil is pushy. Nevil is favorable. Dara is sozzled. If someone is xerophytic and not favorable then they are not sinless. All sozzled people are sufferable. Blue people are sozzled. Nevil is not sufferable.", "logic": "\nPoorly(dieter)\nnot Favorable(dieter)\nSinless(nevil)\nPoorly(nevil)\nPushy(nevil)\nFavorable(nevil)\nSozzled(dara)\nforall x (Xerophytic(x) and not Favorable(x) -> not Sinless(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Sinless(x) -> Sozzled(x))\n\nnot Sufferable(nevil)\n\nSinless(nevil) and forall x (Sinless(x) -> Sozzled(x)) -> therefore Sozzled(nevil) Sozzled(nevil) and forall x (Sozzled(x) -> Sufferable(x)) -> therefore Sufferable(nevil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Corabella is allowable. Corabella is not biovular. Peggy is saharan. Peggy is allowable. Peggy is dominican. Peggy is biovular. Joann is cisalpine. If someone is jingling and not biovular then they are not saharan. All cisalpine people are medial. Blue people are cisalpine. Corabella is not cisalpine.", "logic": "\nAllowable(corabella)\nnot Biovular(corabella)\nSaharan(peggy)\nAllowable(peggy)\nDominican(peggy)\nBiovular(peggy)\nCisalpine(joann)\nforall x (Jingling(x) and not Biovular(x) -> not Saharan(x))\nforall x (Cisalpine(x) -> Medial(x))\nforall x (Saharan(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\n\nnot Cisalpine(corabella)\n\nforall x (Saharan(x) -> Cisalpine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Orelia is algonkian. Orelia is not univocal. Tirrell is accredited. Tirrell is algonkian. Tirrell is tsarist. Tirrell is univocal. Ardelia is indictable. If someone is breastless and not univocal then they are not accredited. All indictable people are curtal. Blue people are indictable. Orelia is curtal.", "logic": "\nAlgonkian(orelia)\nnot Univocal(orelia)\nAccredited(tirrell)\nAlgonkian(tirrell)\nTsarist(tirrell)\nUnivocal(tirrell)\nIndictable(ardelia)\nforall x (Breastless(x) and not Univocal(x) -> not Accredited(x))\nforall x (Indictable(x) -> Curtal(x))\nforall x (Accredited(x) -> Indictable(x))\n\nCurtal(orelia)\n\nforall x (Indictable(x) -> Curtal(x)) <- forall x (Accredited(x) -> Indictable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Elga is jesuitical. Elga is not bogartian. Pepita is gradual. Pepita is jesuitical. Pepita is testaceous. Pepita is bogartian. Beaufort is tubular. If someone is drear and not bogartian then they are not gradual. All tubular people are poriferous. Blue people are tubular. Beaufort is not drear.", "logic": "\nJesuitical(elga)\nnot Bogartian(elga)\nGradual(pepita)\nJesuitical(pepita)\nTestaceous(pepita)\nBogartian(pepita)\nTubular(beaufort)\nforall x (Drear(x) and not Bogartian(x) -> not Gradual(x))\nforall x (Tubular(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) -> Tubular(x))\n\nnot Drear(beaufort)\n\nnot Drear(beaufort) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Conan is restless. Conan is not ersatz. Myke is climbable. Myke is restless. Myke is unemployed. Myke is ersatz. Sigrid is very. If someone is frigid and not ersatz then they are not climbable. All very people are shopsoiled. Blue people are very. Conan is climbable.", "logic": "\nRestless(conan)\nnot Ersatz(conan)\nClimbable(myke)\nRestless(myke)\nUnemployed(myke)\nErsatz(myke)\nVery(sigrid)\nforall x (Frigid(x) and not Ersatz(x) -> not Climbable(x))\nforall x (Very(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Climbable(x) -> Very(x))\n\nClimbable(conan)\n\nClimbable(conan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Sumner is subsequent. Sumner is not spermatic. Istvan is wizardly. Istvan is subsequent. Istvan is diaphysial. Istvan is spermatic. Karlen is acarpelous. If someone is cordiform and not spermatic then they are not wizardly. All acarpelous people are unanimous. Blue people are acarpelous. Karlen is not diaphysial.", "logic": "\nSubsequent(sumner)\nnot Spermatic(sumner)\nWizardly(istvan)\nSubsequent(istvan)\nDiaphysial(istvan)\nSpermatic(istvan)\nAcarpelous(karlen)\nforall x (Cordiform(x) and not Spermatic(x) -> not Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\n\nnot Diaphysial(karlen)\n\nnot Diaphysial(karlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Filide is unsmoothed. Filide is not illusive. Magnum is slivery. Magnum is unsmoothed. Magnum is edematous. Magnum is illusive. Zorro is bandy. If someone is hiplength and not illusive then they are not slivery. All bandy people are fraudulent. Blue people are bandy. Filide is hiplength.", "logic": "\nUnsmoothed(filide)\nnot Illusive(filide)\nSlivery(magnum)\nUnsmoothed(magnum)\nEdematous(magnum)\nIllusive(magnum)\nBandy(zorro)\nforall x (Hiplength(x) and not Illusive(x) -> not Slivery(x))\nforall x (Bandy(x) -> Fraudulent(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) -> Bandy(x))\n\nHiplength(filide)\n\nHiplength(filide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1363"} {"premises": "Joaquin is not marked. Petr is civil. Sissie is afrikaans. Skipton is not unifacial. If someone is marked and jangling then they are afrikaans. If someone is civil and jangling then they are afrikaans. All civil people are jangling. Skipton is not unifacial.", "logic": "\nnot Marked(joaquin)\nCivil(petr)\nAfrikaans(sissie)\nnot Unifacial(skipton)\nforall x (Marked(x) and Jangling(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Civil(x) and Jangling(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Civil(x) -> Jangling(x))\n\nnot Unifacial(skipton)\n\ntherefore not Unifacial(skipton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Skip is not enceinte. Veradis is blowzy. Spiro is presto. Adlai is not semihard. If someone is enceinte and phlegmatic then they are presto. If someone is blowzy and phlegmatic then they are presto. All blowzy people are phlegmatic. Veradis is not blowzy.", "logic": "\nnot Enceinte(skip)\nBlowzy(veradis)\nPresto(spiro)\nnot Semihard(adlai)\nforall x (Enceinte(x) and Phlegmatic(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Blowzy(x) and Phlegmatic(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Blowzy(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\n\nnot Blowzy(veradis)\n\ntherefore Blowzy(veradis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Isaiah is not pimply. Kiah is subacid. Jany is obsessed. Felicio is not topless. If someone is pimply and semitropic then they are obsessed. If someone is subacid and semitropic then they are obsessed. All subacid people are semitropic. Kiah is semitropic.", "logic": "\nnot Pimply(isaiah)\nSubacid(kiah)\nObsessed(jany)\nnot Topless(felicio)\nforall x (Pimply(x) and Semitropic(x) -> Obsessed(x))\nforall x (Subacid(x) and Semitropic(x) -> Obsessed(x))\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> Semitropic(x))\n\nSemitropic(kiah)\n\nSubacid(kiah) and forall x (Subacid(x) -> Semitropic(x)) -> therefore Semitropic(kiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Gershom is not configured. Arlyne is okay. Sheela is cytotoxic. Robenia is not pithy. If someone is configured and explicable then they are cytotoxic. If someone is okay and explicable then they are cytotoxic. All okay people are explicable. Arlyne is not explicable.", "logic": "\nnot Configured(gershom)\nOkay(arlyne)\nCytotoxic(sheela)\nnot Pithy(robenia)\nforall x (Configured(x) and Explicable(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Okay(x) and Explicable(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Okay(x) -> Explicable(x))\n\nnot Explicable(arlyne)\n\nOkay(arlyne) and forall x (Okay(x) -> Explicable(x)) -> therefore Explicable(arlyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Seymour is not curable. Cecile is unstrained. Bernette is buccal. Mersey is not uncharged. If someone is curable and plumbic then they are buccal. If someone is unstrained and plumbic then they are buccal. All unstrained people are plumbic. Cecile is buccal.", "logic": "\nnot Curable(seymour)\nUnstrained(cecile)\nBuccal(bernette)\nnot Uncharged(mersey)\nforall x (Curable(x) and Plumbic(x) -> Buccal(x))\nforall x (Unstrained(x) and Plumbic(x) -> Buccal(x))\nforall x (Unstrained(x) -> Plumbic(x))\n\nBuccal(cecile)\n\nUnstrained(cecile) and forall x (Unstrained(x) -> Plumbic(x)) -> therefore Plumbic(cecile) Unstrained(cecile) and Plumbic(cecile) and forall x (Unstrained(x) and Plumbic(x) -> Buccal(x)) -> therefore Buccal(cecile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Aldwin is not vermiform. Waiter is amusing. Blaine is dormy. Dallas is not unhurried. If someone is vermiform and dosed then they are dormy. If someone is amusing and dosed then they are dormy. All amusing people are dosed. Waiter is not dormy.", "logic": "\nnot Vermiform(aldwin)\nAmusing(waiter)\nDormy(blaine)\nnot Unhurried(dallas)\nforall x (Vermiform(x) and Dosed(x) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Amusing(x) and Dosed(x) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Amusing(x) -> Dosed(x))\n\nnot Dormy(waiter)\n\nAmusing(waiter) and forall x (Amusing(x) -> Dosed(x)) -> therefore Dosed(waiter) Amusing(waiter) and Dosed(waiter) and forall x (Amusing(x) and Dosed(x) -> Dormy(x)) -> therefore Dormy(waiter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Elnora is not olfactory. Hunter is unenrgetic. Amandie is refractive. Philippe is not mitigated. If someone is olfactory and torn then they are refractive. If someone is unenrgetic and torn then they are refractive. All unenrgetic people are torn. Amandie is not torn.", "logic": "\nnot Olfactory(elnora)\nUnenrgetic(hunter)\nRefractive(amandie)\nnot Mitigated(philippe)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and Torn(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) and Torn(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) -> Torn(x))\n\nnot Torn(amandie)\n\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) -> Torn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Gui is not despiteful. Lyda is certified. Alphonse is cleansing. Merrili is not chromatic. If someone is despiteful and lush then they are cleansing. If someone is certified and lush then they are cleansing. All certified people are lush. Gui is lush.", "logic": "\nnot Despiteful(gui)\nCertified(lyda)\nCleansing(alphonse)\nnot Chromatic(merrili)\nforall x (Despiteful(x) and Lush(x) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) and Lush(x) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Lush(x))\n\nLush(gui)\n\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Lush(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Breanne is not umbellar. Birgitta is estimable. Harvie is impeccable. Fallon is not derisive. If someone is umbellar and nonnative then they are impeccable. If someone is estimable and nonnative then they are impeccable. All estimable people are nonnative. Breanne is not impeccable.", "logic": "\nnot Umbellar(breanne)\nEstimable(birgitta)\nImpeccable(harvie)\nnot Derisive(fallon)\nforall x (Umbellar(x) and Nonnative(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Estimable(x) and Nonnative(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Estimable(x) -> Nonnative(x))\n\nnot Impeccable(breanne)\n\nforall x (Umbellar(x) and Nonnative(x) -> Impeccable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Fabio is not artistic. Giles is unbolted. Elvis is eparchial. Merla is not rash. If someone is artistic and harmonised then they are eparchial. If someone is unbolted and harmonised then they are eparchial. All unbolted people are harmonised. Merla is furry.", "logic": "\nnot Artistic(fabio)\nUnbolted(giles)\nEparchial(elvis)\nnot Rash(merla)\nforall x (Artistic(x) and Harmonised(x) -> Eparchial(x))\nforall x (Unbolted(x) and Harmonised(x) -> Eparchial(x))\nforall x (Unbolted(x) -> Harmonised(x))\n\nFurry(merla)\n\nFurry(merla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Ferne is not thespian. Mendie is booked. Aram is vietnamese. Norah is not spatulate. If someone is thespian and grecian then they are vietnamese. If someone is booked and grecian then they are vietnamese. All booked people are grecian. Aram is not booked.", "logic": "\nnot Thespian(ferne)\nBooked(mendie)\nVietnamese(aram)\nnot Spatulate(norah)\nforall x (Thespian(x) and Grecian(x) -> Vietnamese(x))\nforall x (Booked(x) and Grecian(x) -> Vietnamese(x))\nforall x (Booked(x) -> Grecian(x))\n\nnot Booked(aram)\n\nnot Booked(aram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "Casper is not palish. Celestyn is cannular. Jaquith is unafraid. Arvind is not lidless. If someone is palish and anaclitic then they are unafraid. If someone is cannular and anaclitic then they are unafraid. All cannular people are anaclitic. Casper is nice.", "logic": "\nnot Palish(casper)\nCannular(celestyn)\nUnafraid(jaquith)\nnot Lidless(arvind)\nforall x (Palish(x) and Anaclitic(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Cannular(x) and Anaclitic(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\n\nNice(casper)\n\nNice(casper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-900"} {"premises": "The jeromy is dickey. The jeromy is baroque. The jeromy unnerve the arlee. The jeromy unnerve the jorie. The arlee is outdated. The arlee is riant. The arlee is swarthy. The arlee seem the jeromy. The arlee unnerve the jorie. The jorie is dickey. The jorie seem the arlee. The jorie slim the jeromy. If someone seem the jeromy and they see the jeromy then they like the jorie. If someone seem the jeromy then they see the jeromy. If the jeromy seem the jorie and the jorie unnerve the arlee then the jorie slim the arlee. If someone unnerve the jeromy then the jeromy slim the arlee. If someone unnerve the jorie then they like the arlee. If the jeromy unnerve the jorie then the jeromy seem the jorie. If someone is outdated and they visit the jorie then they are swarthy. If someone is dickey then they visit the jorie. The jeromy unnerve the arlee.", "logic": "\nDickey(jeromy)\nBaroque(jeromy)\nUnnerve(jeromy, arlee)\nUnnerve(jeromy, jorie)\nOutdated(arlee)\nRiant(arlee)\nSwarthy(arlee)\nSeem(arlee, jeromy)\nUnnerve(arlee, jorie)\nDickey(jorie)\nSeem(jorie, arlee)\nSlim(jorie, jeromy)\nforall x (Seem(x, jeromy) and Unnerve(x, jeromy) -> Seem(x, jorie))\nforall x (Seem(x, jeromy) -> Unnerve(x, jeromy))\nSeem(jeromy, jorie) and Unnerve(jorie, arlee) -> Slim(jorie, arlee)\nforall x (Unnerve(x, jeromy) -> Slim(jeromy, arlee))\nforall x (Unnerve(x, jorie) -> Seem(x, arlee))\nUnnerve(jeromy, jorie) -> Seem(jeromy, jorie)\nforall x (Outdated(x) and Slim(x, jorie) -> Swarthy(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) -> Slim(x, jorie))\n\nUnnerve(jeromy, arlee)\n\ntherefore Unnerve(jeromy, arlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The benedicta is tantrik. The benedicta is philippine. The benedicta shoulder the ginny. The benedicta shoulder the bernard. The ginny is barebacked. The ginny is crazed. The ginny is executable. The ginny unsay the benedicta. The ginny shoulder the bernard. The bernard is tantrik. The bernard unsay the ginny. The bernard fuss the benedicta. If someone unsay the benedicta and they see the benedicta then they like the bernard. If someone unsay the benedicta then they see the benedicta. If the benedicta unsay the bernard and the bernard shoulder the ginny then the bernard fuss the ginny. If someone shoulder the benedicta then the benedicta fuss the ginny. If someone shoulder the bernard then they like the ginny. If the benedicta shoulder the bernard then the benedicta unsay the bernard. If someone is barebacked and they visit the bernard then they are executable. If someone is tantrik then they visit the bernard. The benedicta is not tantrik.", "logic": "\nTantrik(benedicta)\nPhilippine(benedicta)\nShoulder(benedicta, ginny)\nShoulder(benedicta, bernard)\nBarebacked(ginny)\nCrazed(ginny)\nExecutable(ginny)\nUnsay(ginny, benedicta)\nShoulder(ginny, bernard)\nTantrik(bernard)\nUnsay(bernard, ginny)\nFuss(bernard, benedicta)\nforall x (Unsay(x, benedicta) and Shoulder(x, benedicta) -> Unsay(x, bernard))\nforall x (Unsay(x, benedicta) -> Shoulder(x, benedicta))\nUnsay(benedicta, bernard) and Shoulder(bernard, ginny) -> Fuss(bernard, ginny)\nforall x (Shoulder(x, benedicta) -> Fuss(benedicta, ginny))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, bernard) -> Unsay(x, ginny))\nShoulder(benedicta, bernard) -> Unsay(benedicta, bernard)\nforall x (Barebacked(x) and Fuss(x, bernard) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) -> Fuss(x, bernard))\n\nnot Tantrik(benedicta)\n\ntherefore Tantrik(benedicta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The franny is blebbed. The franny is peaked. The franny hand the trace. The franny hand the palmer. The trace is panoramic. The trace is arabic. The trace is milch. The trace allowance the franny. The trace hand the palmer. The palmer is blebbed. The palmer allowance the trace. The palmer steamroll the franny. If someone allowance the franny and they see the franny then they like the palmer. If someone allowance the franny then they see the franny. If the franny allowance the palmer and the palmer hand the trace then the palmer steamroll the trace. If someone hand the franny then the franny steamroll the trace. If someone hand the palmer then they like the trace. If the franny hand the palmer then the franny allowance the palmer. If someone is panoramic and they visit the palmer then they are milch. If someone is blebbed then they visit the palmer. The trace allowance the trace.", "logic": "\nBlebbed(franny)\nPeaked(franny)\nHand(franny, trace)\nHand(franny, palmer)\nPanoramic(trace)\nArabic(trace)\nMilch(trace)\nAllowance(trace, franny)\nHand(trace, palmer)\nBlebbed(palmer)\nAllowance(palmer, trace)\nSteamroll(palmer, franny)\nforall x (Allowance(x, franny) and Hand(x, franny) -> Allowance(x, palmer))\nforall x (Allowance(x, franny) -> Hand(x, franny))\nAllowance(franny, palmer) and Hand(palmer, trace) -> Steamroll(palmer, trace)\nforall x (Hand(x, franny) -> Steamroll(franny, trace))\nforall x (Hand(x, palmer) -> Allowance(x, trace))\nHand(franny, palmer) -> Allowance(franny, palmer)\nforall x (Panoramic(x) and Steamroll(x, palmer) -> Milch(x))\nforall x (Blebbed(x) -> Steamroll(x, palmer))\n\nAllowance(trace, trace)\n\nHand(trace, palmer) and forall x (Hand(x, palmer) -> Allowance(x, trace)) -> therefore Allowance(trace, trace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The clemmie is lacerate. The clemmie is totalistic. The clemmie condemn the jess. The clemmie condemn the brooks. The jess is hedged. The jess is desegrated. The jess is heedful. The jess decipher the clemmie. The jess condemn the brooks. The brooks is lacerate. The brooks decipher the jess. The brooks rephrase the clemmie. If someone decipher the clemmie and they see the clemmie then they like the brooks. If someone decipher the clemmie then they see the clemmie. If the clemmie decipher the brooks and the brooks condemn the jess then the brooks rephrase the jess. If someone condemn the clemmie then the clemmie rephrase the jess. If someone condemn the brooks then they like the jess. If the clemmie condemn the brooks then the clemmie decipher the brooks. If someone is hedged and they visit the brooks then they are heedful. If someone is lacerate then they visit the brooks. The brooks does not visit the brooks.", "logic": "\nLacerate(clemmie)\nTotalistic(clemmie)\nCondemn(clemmie, jess)\nCondemn(clemmie, brooks)\nHedged(jess)\nDesegrated(jess)\nHeedful(jess)\nDecipher(jess, clemmie)\nCondemn(jess, brooks)\nLacerate(brooks)\nDecipher(brooks, jess)\nRephrase(brooks, clemmie)\nforall x (Decipher(x, clemmie) and Condemn(x, clemmie) -> Decipher(x, brooks))\nforall x (Decipher(x, clemmie) -> Condemn(x, clemmie))\nDecipher(clemmie, brooks) and Condemn(brooks, jess) -> Rephrase(brooks, jess)\nforall x (Condemn(x, clemmie) -> Rephrase(clemmie, jess))\nforall x (Condemn(x, brooks) -> Decipher(x, jess))\nCondemn(clemmie, brooks) -> Decipher(clemmie, brooks)\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Rephrase(x, brooks) -> Heedful(x))\nforall x (Lacerate(x) -> Rephrase(x, brooks))\n\nnot Rephrase(brooks, brooks)\n\nLacerate(brooks) and forall x (Lacerate(x) -> Rephrase(x, brooks)) -> therefore Rephrase(brooks, brooks)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The rog is animist. The rog is acapnic. The rog sovietise the lorry. The rog sovietise the stew. The lorry is surprising. The lorry is vitreous. The lorry is operose. The lorry hotfoot the rog. The lorry sovietise the stew. The stew is animist. The stew hotfoot the lorry. The stew yellow the rog. If someone hotfoot the rog and they see the rog then they like the stew. If someone hotfoot the rog then they see the rog. If the rog hotfoot the stew and the stew sovietise the lorry then the stew yellow the lorry. If someone sovietise the rog then the rog yellow the lorry. If someone sovietise the stew then they like the lorry. If the rog sovietise the stew then the rog hotfoot the stew. If someone is surprising and they visit the stew then they are operose. If someone is animist then they visit the stew. The lorry hotfoot the stew.", "logic": "\nAnimist(rog)\nAcapnic(rog)\nSovietise(rog, lorry)\nSovietise(rog, stew)\nSurprising(lorry)\nVitreous(lorry)\nOperose(lorry)\nHotfoot(lorry, rog)\nSovietise(lorry, stew)\nAnimist(stew)\nHotfoot(stew, lorry)\nYellow(stew, rog)\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, rog) and Sovietise(x, rog) -> Hotfoot(x, stew))\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, rog) -> Sovietise(x, rog))\nHotfoot(rog, stew) and Sovietise(stew, lorry) -> Yellow(stew, lorry)\nforall x (Sovietise(x, rog) -> Yellow(rog, lorry))\nforall x (Sovietise(x, stew) -> Hotfoot(x, lorry))\nSovietise(rog, stew) -> Hotfoot(rog, stew)\nforall x (Surprising(x) and Yellow(x, stew) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Animist(x) -> Yellow(x, stew))\n\nHotfoot(lorry, stew)\n\nHotfoot(lorry, rog) and forall x (Hotfoot(x, rog) -> Sovietise(x, rog)) -> therefore Sovietise(lorry, rog) Hotfoot(lorry, rog) and Sovietise(lorry, rog) and forall x (Hotfoot(x, rog) and Sovietise(x, rog) -> Hotfoot(x, stew)) -> therefore Hotfoot(lorry, stew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The gwenora is bubaline. The gwenora is perineal. The gwenora foray the sile. The gwenora foray the izzi. The sile is sunburned. The sile is scalable. The sile is unlipped. The sile eject the gwenora. The sile foray the izzi. The izzi is bubaline. The izzi eject the sile. The izzi jerk the gwenora. If someone eject the gwenora and they see the gwenora then they like the izzi. If someone eject the gwenora then they see the gwenora. If the gwenora eject the izzi and the izzi foray the sile then the izzi jerk the sile. If someone foray the gwenora then the gwenora jerk the sile. If someone foray the izzi then they like the sile. If the gwenora foray the izzi then the gwenora eject the izzi. If someone is sunburned and they visit the izzi then they are unlipped. If someone is bubaline then they visit the izzi. The gwenora does not visit the sile.", "logic": "\nBubaline(gwenora)\nPerineal(gwenora)\nForay(gwenora, sile)\nForay(gwenora, izzi)\nSunburned(sile)\nScalable(sile)\nUnlipped(sile)\nEject(sile, gwenora)\nForay(sile, izzi)\nBubaline(izzi)\nEject(izzi, sile)\nJerk(izzi, gwenora)\nforall x (Eject(x, gwenora) and Foray(x, gwenora) -> Eject(x, izzi))\nforall x (Eject(x, gwenora) -> Foray(x, gwenora))\nEject(gwenora, izzi) and Foray(izzi, sile) -> Jerk(izzi, sile)\nforall x (Foray(x, gwenora) -> Jerk(gwenora, sile))\nforall x (Foray(x, izzi) -> Eject(x, sile))\nForay(gwenora, izzi) -> Eject(gwenora, izzi)\nforall x (Sunburned(x) and Jerk(x, izzi) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) -> Jerk(x, izzi))\n\nnot Jerk(gwenora, sile)\n\nEject(sile, gwenora) and forall x (Eject(x, gwenora) -> Foray(x, gwenora)) -> therefore Foray(sile, gwenora) Foray(sile, gwenora) and forall x (Foray(x, gwenora) -> Jerk(gwenora, sile)) -> therefore Jerk(gwenora, sile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The chrysler is bespoken. The chrysler is mossy. The chrysler imbrue the carilyn. The chrysler imbrue the ron. The carilyn is straining. The carilyn is homophile. The carilyn is graven. The carilyn maturate the chrysler. The carilyn imbrue the ron. The ron is bespoken. The ron maturate the carilyn. The ron petrify the chrysler. If someone maturate the chrysler and they see the chrysler then they like the ron. If someone maturate the chrysler then they see the chrysler. If the chrysler maturate the ron and the ron imbrue the carilyn then the ron petrify the carilyn. If someone imbrue the chrysler then the chrysler petrify the carilyn. If someone imbrue the ron then they like the carilyn. If the chrysler imbrue the ron then the chrysler maturate the ron. If someone is straining and they visit the ron then they are graven. If someone is bespoken then they visit the ron. The chrysler is not graven.", "logic": "\nBespoken(chrysler)\nMossy(chrysler)\nImbrue(chrysler, carilyn)\nImbrue(chrysler, ron)\nStraining(carilyn)\nHomophile(carilyn)\nGraven(carilyn)\nMaturate(carilyn, chrysler)\nImbrue(carilyn, ron)\nBespoken(ron)\nMaturate(ron, carilyn)\nPetrify(ron, chrysler)\nforall x (Maturate(x, chrysler) and Imbrue(x, chrysler) -> Maturate(x, ron))\nforall x (Maturate(x, chrysler) -> Imbrue(x, chrysler))\nMaturate(chrysler, ron) and Imbrue(ron, carilyn) -> Petrify(ron, carilyn)\nforall x (Imbrue(x, chrysler) -> Petrify(chrysler, carilyn))\nforall x (Imbrue(x, ron) -> Maturate(x, carilyn))\nImbrue(chrysler, ron) -> Maturate(chrysler, ron)\nforall x (Straining(x) and Petrify(x, ron) -> Graven(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Petrify(x, ron))\n\nnot Graven(chrysler)\n\nforall x (Straining(x) and Petrify(x, ron) -> Graven(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The debi is unarmoured. The debi is futureless. The debi parachute the florie. The debi parachute the maura. The florie is cylindric. The florie is nonleaded. The florie is lissome. The florie inveigle the debi. The florie parachute the maura. The maura is unarmoured. The maura inveigle the florie. The maura childproof the debi. If someone inveigle the debi and they see the debi then they like the maura. If someone inveigle the debi then they see the debi. If the debi inveigle the maura and the maura parachute the florie then the maura childproof the florie. If someone parachute the debi then the debi childproof the florie. If someone parachute the maura then they like the florie. If the debi parachute the maura then the debi inveigle the maura. If someone is cylindric and they visit the maura then they are lissome. If someone is unarmoured then they visit the maura. The maura parachute the debi.", "logic": "\nUnarmoured(debi)\nFutureless(debi)\nParachute(debi, florie)\nParachute(debi, maura)\nCylindric(florie)\nNonleaded(florie)\nLissome(florie)\nInveigle(florie, debi)\nParachute(florie, maura)\nUnarmoured(maura)\nInveigle(maura, florie)\nChildproof(maura, debi)\nforall x (Inveigle(x, debi) and Parachute(x, debi) -> Inveigle(x, maura))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, debi) -> Parachute(x, debi))\nInveigle(debi, maura) and Parachute(maura, florie) -> Childproof(maura, florie)\nforall x (Parachute(x, debi) -> Childproof(debi, florie))\nforall x (Parachute(x, maura) -> Inveigle(x, florie))\nParachute(debi, maura) -> Inveigle(debi, maura)\nforall x (Cylindric(x) and Childproof(x, maura) -> Lissome(x))\nforall x (Unarmoured(x) -> Childproof(x, maura))\n\nParachute(maura, debi)\n\nforall x (Inveigle(x, debi) -> Parachute(x, debi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The tobey is recurring. The tobey is blithe. The tobey lade the wolfgang. The tobey lade the zachery. The wolfgang is tangerine. The wolfgang is decimal. The wolfgang is pneumonic. The wolfgang windsurf the tobey. The wolfgang lade the zachery. The zachery is recurring. The zachery windsurf the wolfgang. The zachery bolshevise the tobey. If someone windsurf the tobey and they see the tobey then they like the zachery. If someone windsurf the tobey then they see the tobey. If the tobey windsurf the zachery and the zachery lade the wolfgang then the zachery bolshevise the wolfgang. If someone lade the tobey then the tobey bolshevise the wolfgang. If someone lade the zachery then they like the wolfgang. If the tobey lade the zachery then the tobey windsurf the zachery. If someone is tangerine and they visit the zachery then they are pneumonic. If someone is recurring then they visit the zachery. The zachery is not pneumonic.", "logic": "\nRecurring(tobey)\nBlithe(tobey)\nLade(tobey, wolfgang)\nLade(tobey, zachery)\nTangerine(wolfgang)\nDecimal(wolfgang)\nPneumonic(wolfgang)\nWindsurf(wolfgang, tobey)\nLade(wolfgang, zachery)\nRecurring(zachery)\nWindsurf(zachery, wolfgang)\nBolshevise(zachery, tobey)\nforall x (Windsurf(x, tobey) and Lade(x, tobey) -> Windsurf(x, zachery))\nforall x (Windsurf(x, tobey) -> Lade(x, tobey))\nWindsurf(tobey, zachery) and Lade(zachery, wolfgang) -> Bolshevise(zachery, wolfgang)\nforall x (Lade(x, tobey) -> Bolshevise(tobey, wolfgang))\nforall x (Lade(x, zachery) -> Windsurf(x, wolfgang))\nLade(tobey, zachery) -> Windsurf(tobey, zachery)\nforall x (Tangerine(x) and Bolshevise(x, zachery) -> Pneumonic(x))\nforall x (Recurring(x) -> Bolshevise(x, zachery))\n\nnot Pneumonic(zachery)\n\nforall x (Tangerine(x) and Bolshevise(x, zachery) -> Pneumonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The allis is manifold. The allis is unstained. The allis winch the wilma. The allis winch the rab. The wilma is unsorted. The wilma is subnormal. The wilma is seasick. The wilma palatalize the allis. The wilma winch the rab. The rab is manifold. The rab palatalize the wilma. The rab liberalise the allis. If someone palatalize the allis and they see the allis then they like the rab. If someone palatalize the allis then they see the allis. If the allis palatalize the rab and the rab winch the wilma then the rab liberalise the wilma. If someone winch the allis then the allis liberalise the wilma. If someone winch the rab then they like the wilma. If the allis winch the rab then the allis palatalize the rab. If someone is unsorted and they visit the rab then they are seasick. If someone is manifold then they visit the rab. The rab winch the rab.", "logic": "\nManifold(allis)\nUnstained(allis)\nWinch(allis, wilma)\nWinch(allis, rab)\nUnsorted(wilma)\nSubnormal(wilma)\nSeasick(wilma)\nPalatalize(wilma, allis)\nWinch(wilma, rab)\nManifold(rab)\nPalatalize(rab, wilma)\nLiberalise(rab, allis)\nforall x (Palatalize(x, allis) and Winch(x, allis) -> Palatalize(x, rab))\nforall x (Palatalize(x, allis) -> Winch(x, allis))\nPalatalize(allis, rab) and Winch(rab, wilma) -> Liberalise(rab, wilma)\nforall x (Winch(x, allis) -> Liberalise(allis, wilma))\nforall x (Winch(x, rab) -> Palatalize(x, wilma))\nWinch(allis, rab) -> Palatalize(allis, rab)\nforall x (Unsorted(x) and Liberalise(x, rab) -> Seasick(x))\nforall x (Manifold(x) -> Liberalise(x, rab))\n\nWinch(rab, rab)\n\nWinch(rab, rab) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The tildi is hypnagogic. The tildi is ready. The tildi taxi the phineas. The tildi taxi the ambrosio. The phineas is avertable. The phineas is jungly. The phineas is regional. The phineas starch the tildi. The phineas taxi the ambrosio. The ambrosio is hypnagogic. The ambrosio starch the phineas. The ambrosio leave the tildi. If someone starch the tildi and they see the tildi then they like the ambrosio. If someone starch the tildi then they see the tildi. If the tildi starch the ambrosio and the ambrosio taxi the phineas then the ambrosio leave the phineas. If someone taxi the tildi then the tildi leave the phineas. If someone taxi the ambrosio then they like the phineas. If the tildi taxi the ambrosio then the tildi starch the ambrosio. If someone is avertable and they visit the ambrosio then they are regional. If someone is hypnagogic then they visit the ambrosio. The phineas is not ready.", "logic": "\nHypnagogic(tildi)\nReady(tildi)\nTaxi(tildi, phineas)\nTaxi(tildi, ambrosio)\nAvertable(phineas)\nJungly(phineas)\nRegional(phineas)\nStarch(phineas, tildi)\nTaxi(phineas, ambrosio)\nHypnagogic(ambrosio)\nStarch(ambrosio, phineas)\nLeave(ambrosio, tildi)\nforall x (Starch(x, tildi) and Taxi(x, tildi) -> Starch(x, ambrosio))\nforall x (Starch(x, tildi) -> Taxi(x, tildi))\nStarch(tildi, ambrosio) and Taxi(ambrosio, phineas) -> Leave(ambrosio, phineas)\nforall x (Taxi(x, tildi) -> Leave(tildi, phineas))\nforall x (Taxi(x, ambrosio) -> Starch(x, phineas))\nTaxi(tildi, ambrosio) -> Starch(tildi, ambrosio)\nforall x (Avertable(x) and Leave(x, ambrosio) -> Regional(x))\nforall x (Hypnagogic(x) -> Leave(x, ambrosio))\n\nnot Ready(phineas)\n\nnot Ready(phineas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "The adi is inhibitory. The adi is anabatic. The adi mussitate the jewelle. The adi mussitate the bathsheba. The jewelle is korean. The jewelle is opened. The jewelle is palmate. The jewelle crochet the adi. The jewelle mussitate the bathsheba. The bathsheba is inhibitory. The bathsheba crochet the jewelle. The bathsheba fabricate the adi. If someone crochet the adi and they see the adi then they like the bathsheba. If someone crochet the adi then they see the adi. If the adi crochet the bathsheba and the bathsheba mussitate the jewelle then the bathsheba fabricate the jewelle. If someone mussitate the adi then the adi fabricate the jewelle. If someone mussitate the bathsheba then they like the jewelle. If the adi mussitate the bathsheba then the adi crochet the bathsheba. If someone is korean and they visit the bathsheba then they are palmate. If someone is inhibitory then they visit the bathsheba. The bathsheba crochet the adi.", "logic": "\nInhibitory(adi)\nAnabatic(adi)\nMussitate(adi, jewelle)\nMussitate(adi, bathsheba)\nKorean(jewelle)\nOpened(jewelle)\nPalmate(jewelle)\nCrochet(jewelle, adi)\nMussitate(jewelle, bathsheba)\nInhibitory(bathsheba)\nCrochet(bathsheba, jewelle)\nFabricate(bathsheba, adi)\nforall x (Crochet(x, adi) and Mussitate(x, adi) -> Crochet(x, bathsheba))\nforall x (Crochet(x, adi) -> Mussitate(x, adi))\nCrochet(adi, bathsheba) and Mussitate(bathsheba, jewelle) -> Fabricate(bathsheba, jewelle)\nforall x (Mussitate(x, adi) -> Fabricate(adi, jewelle))\nforall x (Mussitate(x, bathsheba) -> Crochet(x, jewelle))\nMussitate(adi, bathsheba) -> Crochet(adi, bathsheba)\nforall x (Korean(x) and Fabricate(x, bathsheba) -> Palmate(x))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) -> Fabricate(x, bathsheba))\n\nCrochet(bathsheba, adi)\n\nCrochet(bathsheba, adi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1660"} {"premises": "Harriot is columbian. Harriot is abhorrent. Harriot is lawful. Harriot is forked. Harriot is bumptious. Julius is abhorrent. Julius is not lawful. Julius is forked. Julius is delighted. Julius is bumptious. Julius is ramous. Oneida is columbian. Oneida is not abhorrent. Oneida is lawful. Oneida is ramous. Rough, ramous people are delighted. Rough, abhorrent people are ramous. If Harriot is columbian and Harriot is not ramous then Harriot is lawful. Julius is forked.", "logic": "\nColumbian(harriot)\nAbhorrent(harriot)\nLawful(harriot)\nForked(harriot)\nBumptious(harriot)\nAbhorrent(julius)\nnot Lawful(julius)\nForked(julius)\nDelighted(julius)\nBumptious(julius)\nRamous(julius)\nColumbian(oneida)\nnot Abhorrent(oneida)\nLawful(oneida)\nRamous(oneida)\nforall x (Forked(x) and Ramous(x) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Forked(x) and Abhorrent(x) -> Ramous(x))\nColumbian(harriot) and not Ramous(harriot) -> Lawful(harriot)\n\nForked(julius)\n\ntherefore Forked(julius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Sharlene is joint. Sharlene is lyric. Sharlene is exogamous. Sharlene is tarsal. Sharlene is anoxemic. Quinlan is lyric. Quinlan is not exogamous. Quinlan is tarsal. Quinlan is rheologic. Quinlan is anoxemic. Quinlan is boxlike. Andie is joint. Andie is not lyric. Andie is exogamous. Andie is boxlike. Rough, boxlike people are rheologic. Rough, lyric people are boxlike. If Sharlene is joint and Sharlene is not boxlike then Sharlene is exogamous. Quinlan is not boxlike.", "logic": "\nJoint(sharlene)\nLyric(sharlene)\nExogamous(sharlene)\nTarsal(sharlene)\nAnoxemic(sharlene)\nLyric(quinlan)\nnot Exogamous(quinlan)\nTarsal(quinlan)\nRheologic(quinlan)\nAnoxemic(quinlan)\nBoxlike(quinlan)\nJoint(andie)\nnot Lyric(andie)\nExogamous(andie)\nBoxlike(andie)\nforall x (Tarsal(x) and Boxlike(x) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Tarsal(x) and Lyric(x) -> Boxlike(x))\nJoint(sharlene) and not Boxlike(sharlene) -> Exogamous(sharlene)\n\nnot Boxlike(quinlan)\n\ntherefore Boxlike(quinlan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Maryanna is donatist. Maryanna is vedic. Maryanna is widowed. Maryanna is backstair. Maryanna is drooping. Janet is vedic. Janet is not widowed. Janet is backstair. Janet is smothering. Janet is drooping. Janet is analytic. Edeline is donatist. Edeline is not vedic. Edeline is widowed. Edeline is analytic. Rough, analytic people are smothering. Rough, vedic people are analytic. If Maryanna is donatist and Maryanna is not analytic then Maryanna is widowed. Maryanna is analytic.", "logic": "\nDonatist(maryanna)\nVedic(maryanna)\nWidowed(maryanna)\nBackstair(maryanna)\nDrooping(maryanna)\nVedic(janet)\nnot Widowed(janet)\nBackstair(janet)\nSmothering(janet)\nDrooping(janet)\nAnalytic(janet)\nDonatist(edeline)\nnot Vedic(edeline)\nWidowed(edeline)\nAnalytic(edeline)\nforall x (Backstair(x) and Analytic(x) -> Smothering(x))\nforall x (Backstair(x) and Vedic(x) -> Analytic(x))\nDonatist(maryanna) and not Analytic(maryanna) -> Widowed(maryanna)\n\nAnalytic(maryanna)\n\nBackstair(maryanna) and Vedic(maryanna) and forall x (Backstair(x) and Vedic(x) -> Analytic(x)) -> therefore Analytic(maryanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Warner is indicative. Warner is verified. Warner is lengthways. Warner is alphameric. Warner is glomerular. Arlyn is verified. Arlyn is not lengthways. Arlyn is alphameric. Arlyn is ironlike. Arlyn is glomerular. Arlyn is butcherly. Stephine is indicative. Stephine is not verified. Stephine is lengthways. Stephine is butcherly. Rough, butcherly people are ironlike. Rough, verified people are butcherly. If Warner is indicative and Warner is not butcherly then Warner is lengthways. Warner is not butcherly.", "logic": "\nIndicative(warner)\nVerified(warner)\nLengthways(warner)\nAlphameric(warner)\nGlomerular(warner)\nVerified(arlyn)\nnot Lengthways(arlyn)\nAlphameric(arlyn)\nIronlike(arlyn)\nGlomerular(arlyn)\nButcherly(arlyn)\nIndicative(stephine)\nnot Verified(stephine)\nLengthways(stephine)\nButcherly(stephine)\nforall x (Alphameric(x) and Butcherly(x) -> Ironlike(x))\nforall x (Alphameric(x) and Verified(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nIndicative(warner) and not Butcherly(warner) -> Lengthways(warner)\n\nnot Butcherly(warner)\n\nAlphameric(warner) and Verified(warner) and forall x (Alphameric(x) and Verified(x) -> Butcherly(x)) -> therefore Butcherly(warner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Giacinta is visible. Giacinta is threaded. Giacinta is inverse. Giacinta is governing. Giacinta is catechetic. Tilda is threaded. Tilda is not inverse. Tilda is governing. Tilda is arranged. Tilda is catechetic. Tilda is ancillary. Valentia is visible. Valentia is not threaded. Valentia is inverse. Valentia is ancillary. Rough, ancillary people are arranged. Rough, threaded people are ancillary. If Giacinta is visible and Giacinta is not ancillary then Giacinta is inverse. Giacinta is arranged.", "logic": "\nVisible(giacinta)\nThreaded(giacinta)\nInverse(giacinta)\nGoverning(giacinta)\nCatechetic(giacinta)\nThreaded(tilda)\nnot Inverse(tilda)\nGoverning(tilda)\nArranged(tilda)\nCatechetic(tilda)\nAncillary(tilda)\nVisible(valentia)\nnot Threaded(valentia)\nInverse(valentia)\nAncillary(valentia)\nforall x (Governing(x) and Ancillary(x) -> Arranged(x))\nforall x (Governing(x) and Threaded(x) -> Ancillary(x))\nVisible(giacinta) and not Ancillary(giacinta) -> Inverse(giacinta)\n\nArranged(giacinta)\n\nGoverning(giacinta) and Threaded(giacinta) and forall x (Governing(x) and Threaded(x) -> Ancillary(x)) -> therefore Ancillary(giacinta) Governing(giacinta) and Ancillary(giacinta) and forall x (Governing(x) and Ancillary(x) -> Arranged(x)) -> therefore Arranged(giacinta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Sterling is struck. Sterling is ropey. Sterling is unwrinkled. Sterling is steroidal. Sterling is packed. Aleks is ropey. Aleks is not unwrinkled. Aleks is steroidal. Aleks is tonic. Aleks is packed. Aleks is bouldered. Garret is struck. Garret is not ropey. Garret is unwrinkled. Garret is bouldered. Rough, bouldered people are tonic. Rough, ropey people are bouldered. If Sterling is struck and Sterling is not bouldered then Sterling is unwrinkled. Sterling is not tonic.", "logic": "\nStruck(sterling)\nRopey(sterling)\nUnwrinkled(sterling)\nSteroidal(sterling)\nPacked(sterling)\nRopey(aleks)\nnot Unwrinkled(aleks)\nSteroidal(aleks)\nTonic(aleks)\nPacked(aleks)\nBouldered(aleks)\nStruck(garret)\nnot Ropey(garret)\nUnwrinkled(garret)\nBouldered(garret)\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Bouldered(x) -> Tonic(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Ropey(x) -> Bouldered(x))\nStruck(sterling) and not Bouldered(sterling) -> Unwrinkled(sterling)\n\nnot Tonic(sterling)\n\nSteroidal(sterling) and Ropey(sterling) and forall x (Steroidal(x) and Ropey(x) -> Bouldered(x)) -> therefore Bouldered(sterling) Steroidal(sterling) and Bouldered(sterling) and forall x (Steroidal(x) and Bouldered(x) -> Tonic(x)) -> therefore Tonic(sterling)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Shoshanna is allover. Shoshanna is caloric. Shoshanna is pregnant. Shoshanna is follicular. Shoshanna is sevenfold. Ainslie is caloric. Ainslie is not pregnant. Ainslie is follicular. Ainslie is myalgic. Ainslie is sevenfold. Ainslie is acoustical. Tabby is allover. Tabby is not caloric. Tabby is pregnant. Tabby is acoustical. Rough, acoustical people are myalgic. Rough, caloric people are acoustical. If Shoshanna is allover and Shoshanna is not acoustical then Shoshanna is pregnant. Tabby is not myalgic.", "logic": "\nAllover(shoshanna)\nCaloric(shoshanna)\nPregnant(shoshanna)\nFollicular(shoshanna)\nSevenfold(shoshanna)\nCaloric(ainslie)\nnot Pregnant(ainslie)\nFollicular(ainslie)\nMyalgic(ainslie)\nSevenfold(ainslie)\nAcoustical(ainslie)\nAllover(tabby)\nnot Caloric(tabby)\nPregnant(tabby)\nAcoustical(tabby)\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Acoustical(x) -> Myalgic(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Caloric(x) -> Acoustical(x))\nAllover(shoshanna) and not Acoustical(shoshanna) -> Pregnant(shoshanna)\n\nnot Myalgic(tabby)\n\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Acoustical(x) -> Myalgic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Dove is aspherical. Dove is zany. Dove is deific. Dove is lumpy. Dove is consumable. Udall is zany. Udall is not deific. Udall is lumpy. Udall is crustlike. Udall is consumable. Udall is leonine. Grata is aspherical. Grata is not zany. Grata is deific. Grata is leonine. Rough, leonine people are crustlike. Rough, zany people are leonine. If Dove is aspherical and Dove is not leonine then Dove is deific. Grata is lumpy.", "logic": "\nAspherical(dove)\nZany(dove)\nDeific(dove)\nLumpy(dove)\nConsumable(dove)\nZany(udall)\nnot Deific(udall)\nLumpy(udall)\nCrustlike(udall)\nConsumable(udall)\nLeonine(udall)\nAspherical(grata)\nnot Zany(grata)\nDeific(grata)\nLeonine(grata)\nforall x (Lumpy(x) and Leonine(x) -> Crustlike(x))\nforall x (Lumpy(x) and Zany(x) -> Leonine(x))\nAspherical(dove) and not Leonine(dove) -> Deific(dove)\n\nLumpy(grata)\n\nLumpy(grata) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Vena is sacral. Vena is xcviii. Vena is audenesque. Vena is monumental. Vena is proper. Mona is xcviii. Mona is not audenesque. Mona is monumental. Mona is scoreless. Mona is proper. Mona is romanic. Dominick is sacral. Dominick is not xcviii. Dominick is audenesque. Dominick is romanic. Rough, romanic people are scoreless. Rough, xcviii people are romanic. If Vena is sacral and Vena is not romanic then Vena is audenesque. Mona is not sacral.", "logic": "\nSacral(vena)\nXcviii(vena)\nAudenesque(vena)\nMonumental(vena)\nProper(vena)\nXcviii(mona)\nnot Audenesque(mona)\nMonumental(mona)\nScoreless(mona)\nProper(mona)\nRomanic(mona)\nSacral(dominick)\nnot Xcviii(dominick)\nAudenesque(dominick)\nRomanic(dominick)\nforall x (Monumental(x) and Romanic(x) -> Scoreless(x))\nforall x (Monumental(x) and Xcviii(x) -> Romanic(x))\nSacral(vena) and not Romanic(vena) -> Audenesque(vena)\n\nnot Sacral(mona)\n\nnot Sacral(mona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "Sylvan is acceptive. Sylvan is numerical. Sylvan is groveling. Sylvan is sleepy. Sylvan is unfaceted. Clayborn is numerical. Clayborn is not groveling. Clayborn is sleepy. Clayborn is floodlit. Clayborn is unfaceted. Clayborn is thermoset. Gertrud is acceptive. Gertrud is not numerical. Gertrud is groveling. Gertrud is thermoset. Rough, thermoset people are floodlit. Rough, numerical people are thermoset. If Sylvan is acceptive and Sylvan is not thermoset then Sylvan is groveling. Gertrud is unfaceted.", "logic": "\nAcceptive(sylvan)\nNumerical(sylvan)\nGroveling(sylvan)\nSleepy(sylvan)\nUnfaceted(sylvan)\nNumerical(clayborn)\nnot Groveling(clayborn)\nSleepy(clayborn)\nFloodlit(clayborn)\nUnfaceted(clayborn)\nThermoset(clayborn)\nAcceptive(gertrud)\nnot Numerical(gertrud)\nGroveling(gertrud)\nThermoset(gertrud)\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Thermoset(x) -> Floodlit(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Numerical(x) -> Thermoset(x))\nAcceptive(sylvan) and not Thermoset(sylvan) -> Groveling(sylvan)\n\nUnfaceted(gertrud)\n\nUnfaceted(gertrud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1786"} {"premises": "The mitchel maunder the thorndike. The mitchel continue the thorndike. The thorndike maunder the mitchel. The thorndike is pulmonary. The thorndike is joined. The thorndike is avenged. The thorndike continue the mitchel. If someone spring the thorndike then they need the thorndike. If someone is joined then they like the thorndike. If the mitchel is pulmonary and the mitchel maunder the thorndike then the thorndike is not overmodest. If the mitchel continue the thorndike then the mitchel maunder the thorndike. If someone is overmodest and they need the thorndike then the thorndike continue the mitchel. If someone continue the thorndike and the thorndike is not overmodest then they do not like the mitchel. If someone is joined and they eat the thorndike then they like the mitchel. If someone spring the mitchel then the mitchel is overmodest. The thorndike continue the mitchel.", "logic": "\nMaunder(mitchel, thorndike)\nContinue(mitchel, thorndike)\nMaunder(thorndike, mitchel)\nPulmonary(thorndike)\nJoined(thorndike)\nAvenged(thorndike)\nContinue(thorndike, mitchel)\nforall x (Spring(x, thorndike) -> Continue(x, thorndike))\nforall x (Joined(x) -> Spring(x, thorndike))\nPulmonary(mitchel) and Maunder(mitchel, thorndike) -> not Overmodest(thorndike)\nContinue(mitchel, thorndike) -> Maunder(mitchel, thorndike)\nforall x (Overmodest(x) and Continue(x, thorndike) -> Continue(thorndike, mitchel))\nforall x (Continue(x, thorndike) and not Overmodest(thorndike) -> not Spring(x, mitchel))\nforall x (Joined(x) and Maunder(x, thorndike) -> Spring(x, mitchel))\nforall x (Spring(x, mitchel) -> Overmodest(mitchel))\n\nContinue(thorndike, mitchel)\n\ntherefore Continue(thorndike, mitchel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The luciana connect the hartwell. The luciana inhume the hartwell. The hartwell connect the luciana. The hartwell is wayward. The hartwell is japanese. The hartwell is tolerant. The hartwell inhume the luciana. If someone browbeat the hartwell then they need the hartwell. If someone is japanese then they like the hartwell. If the luciana is wayward and the luciana connect the hartwell then the hartwell is not getable. If the luciana inhume the hartwell then the luciana connect the hartwell. If someone is getable and they need the hartwell then the hartwell inhume the luciana. If someone inhume the hartwell and the hartwell is not getable then they do not like the luciana. If someone is japanese and they eat the hartwell then they like the luciana. If someone browbeat the luciana then the luciana is getable. The hartwell does not eat the luciana.", "logic": "\nConnect(luciana, hartwell)\nInhume(luciana, hartwell)\nConnect(hartwell, luciana)\nWayward(hartwell)\nJapanese(hartwell)\nTolerant(hartwell)\nInhume(hartwell, luciana)\nforall x (Browbeat(x, hartwell) -> Inhume(x, hartwell))\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> Browbeat(x, hartwell))\nWayward(luciana) and Connect(luciana, hartwell) -> not Getable(hartwell)\nInhume(luciana, hartwell) -> Connect(luciana, hartwell)\nforall x (Getable(x) and Inhume(x, hartwell) -> Inhume(hartwell, luciana))\nforall x (Inhume(x, hartwell) and not Getable(hartwell) -> not Browbeat(x, luciana))\nforall x (Japanese(x) and Connect(x, hartwell) -> Browbeat(x, luciana))\nforall x (Browbeat(x, luciana) -> Getable(luciana))\n\nnot Connect(hartwell, luciana)\n\ntherefore Connect(hartwell, luciana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The elena luminesce the sorcha. The elena presuppose the sorcha. The sorcha luminesce the elena. The sorcha is vibrant. The sorcha is plangent. The sorcha is mansard. The sorcha presuppose the elena. If someone advance the sorcha then they need the sorcha. If someone is plangent then they like the sorcha. If the elena is vibrant and the elena luminesce the sorcha then the sorcha is not undreamed. If the elena presuppose the sorcha then the elena luminesce the sorcha. If someone is undreamed and they need the sorcha then the sorcha presuppose the elena. If someone presuppose the sorcha and the sorcha is not undreamed then they do not like the elena. If someone is plangent and they eat the sorcha then they like the elena. If someone advance the elena then the elena is undreamed. The sorcha advance the sorcha.", "logic": "\nLuminesce(elena, sorcha)\nPresuppose(elena, sorcha)\nLuminesce(sorcha, elena)\nVibrant(sorcha)\nPlangent(sorcha)\nMansard(sorcha)\nPresuppose(sorcha, elena)\nforall x (Advance(x, sorcha) -> Presuppose(x, sorcha))\nforall x (Plangent(x) -> Advance(x, sorcha))\nVibrant(elena) and Luminesce(elena, sorcha) -> not Undreamed(sorcha)\nPresuppose(elena, sorcha) -> Luminesce(elena, sorcha)\nforall x (Undreamed(x) and Presuppose(x, sorcha) -> Presuppose(sorcha, elena))\nforall x (Presuppose(x, sorcha) and not Undreamed(sorcha) -> not Advance(x, elena))\nforall x (Plangent(x) and Luminesce(x, sorcha) -> Advance(x, elena))\nforall x (Advance(x, elena) -> Undreamed(elena))\n\nAdvance(sorcha, sorcha)\n\nPlangent(sorcha) and forall x (Plangent(x) -> Advance(x, sorcha)) -> therefore Advance(sorcha, sorcha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The averil debut the lisette. The averil lament the lisette. The lisette debut the averil. The lisette is resurgent. The lisette is super. The lisette is melancholy. The lisette lament the averil. If someone patinate the lisette then they need the lisette. If someone is super then they like the lisette. If the averil is resurgent and the averil debut the lisette then the lisette is not sunlit. If the averil lament the lisette then the averil debut the lisette. If someone is sunlit and they need the lisette then the lisette lament the averil. If someone lament the lisette and the lisette is not sunlit then they do not like the averil. If someone is super and they eat the lisette then they like the averil. If someone patinate the averil then the averil is sunlit. The lisette does not like the lisette.", "logic": "\nDebut(averil, lisette)\nLament(averil, lisette)\nDebut(lisette, averil)\nResurgent(lisette)\nSuper(lisette)\nMelancholy(lisette)\nLament(lisette, averil)\nforall x (Patinate(x, lisette) -> Lament(x, lisette))\nforall x (Super(x) -> Patinate(x, lisette))\nResurgent(averil) and Debut(averil, lisette) -> not Sunlit(lisette)\nLament(averil, lisette) -> Debut(averil, lisette)\nforall x (Sunlit(x) and Lament(x, lisette) -> Lament(lisette, averil))\nforall x (Lament(x, lisette) and not Sunlit(lisette) -> not Patinate(x, averil))\nforall x (Super(x) and Debut(x, lisette) -> Patinate(x, averil))\nforall x (Patinate(x, averil) -> Sunlit(averil))\n\nnot Patinate(lisette, lisette)\n\nSuper(lisette) and forall x (Super(x) -> Patinate(x, lisette)) -> therefore Patinate(lisette, lisette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The dore expel the christel. The dore pulverize the christel. The christel expel the dore. The christel is straplike. The christel is cliched. The christel is centesimal. The christel pulverize the dore. If someone premiss the christel then they need the christel. If someone is cliched then they like the christel. If the dore is straplike and the dore expel the christel then the christel is not luscious. If the dore pulverize the christel then the dore expel the christel. If someone is luscious and they need the christel then the christel pulverize the dore. If someone pulverize the christel and the christel is not luscious then they do not like the dore. If someone is cliched and they eat the christel then they like the dore. If someone premiss the dore then the dore is luscious. The christel pulverize the christel.", "logic": "\nExpel(dore, christel)\nPulverize(dore, christel)\nExpel(christel, dore)\nStraplike(christel)\nCliched(christel)\nCentesimal(christel)\nPulverize(christel, dore)\nforall x (Premiss(x, christel) -> Pulverize(x, christel))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Premiss(x, christel))\nStraplike(dore) and Expel(dore, christel) -> not Luscious(christel)\nPulverize(dore, christel) -> Expel(dore, christel)\nforall x (Luscious(x) and Pulverize(x, christel) -> Pulverize(christel, dore))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, christel) and not Luscious(christel) -> not Premiss(x, dore))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Expel(x, christel) -> Premiss(x, dore))\nforall x (Premiss(x, dore) -> Luscious(dore))\n\nPulverize(christel, christel)\n\nCliched(christel) and forall x (Cliched(x) -> Premiss(x, christel)) -> therefore Premiss(christel, christel) Premiss(christel, christel) and forall x (Premiss(x, christel) -> Pulverize(x, christel)) -> therefore Pulverize(christel, christel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The luise cheek the idaline. The luise turf the idaline. The idaline cheek the luise. The idaline is attended. The idaline is nonliving. The idaline is vigesimal. The idaline turf the luise. If someone toast the idaline then they need the idaline. If someone is nonliving then they like the idaline. If the luise is attended and the luise cheek the idaline then the idaline is not nosocomial. If the luise turf the idaline then the luise cheek the idaline. If someone is nosocomial and they need the idaline then the idaline turf the luise. If someone turf the idaline and the idaline is not nosocomial then they do not like the luise. If someone is nonliving and they eat the idaline then they like the luise. If someone toast the luise then the luise is nosocomial. The idaline does not need the idaline.", "logic": "\nCheek(luise, idaline)\nTurf(luise, idaline)\nCheek(idaline, luise)\nAttended(idaline)\nNonliving(idaline)\nVigesimal(idaline)\nTurf(idaline, luise)\nforall x (Toast(x, idaline) -> Turf(x, idaline))\nforall x (Nonliving(x) -> Toast(x, idaline))\nAttended(luise) and Cheek(luise, idaline) -> not Nosocomial(idaline)\nTurf(luise, idaline) -> Cheek(luise, idaline)\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and Turf(x, idaline) -> Turf(idaline, luise))\nforall x (Turf(x, idaline) and not Nosocomial(idaline) -> not Toast(x, luise))\nforall x (Nonliving(x) and Cheek(x, idaline) -> Toast(x, luise))\nforall x (Toast(x, luise) -> Nosocomial(luise))\n\nnot Turf(idaline, idaline)\n\nNonliving(idaline) and forall x (Nonliving(x) -> Toast(x, idaline)) -> therefore Toast(idaline, idaline) Toast(idaline, idaline) and forall x (Toast(x, idaline) -> Turf(x, idaline)) -> therefore Turf(idaline, idaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The clari starch the silas. The clari dismember the silas. The silas starch the clari. The silas is forceful. The silas is hazel. The silas is malcontent. The silas dismember the clari. If someone ossify the silas then they need the silas. If someone is hazel then they like the silas. If the clari is forceful and the clari starch the silas then the silas is not shallow. If the clari dismember the silas then the clari starch the silas. If someone is shallow and they need the silas then the silas dismember the clari. If someone dismember the silas and the silas is not shallow then they do not like the clari. If someone is hazel and they eat the silas then they like the clari. If someone ossify the clari then the clari is shallow. The clari does not like the silas.", "logic": "\nStarch(clari, silas)\nDismember(clari, silas)\nStarch(silas, clari)\nForceful(silas)\nHazel(silas)\nMalcontent(silas)\nDismember(silas, clari)\nforall x (Ossify(x, silas) -> Dismember(x, silas))\nforall x (Hazel(x) -> Ossify(x, silas))\nForceful(clari) and Starch(clari, silas) -> not Shallow(silas)\nDismember(clari, silas) -> Starch(clari, silas)\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Dismember(x, silas) -> Dismember(silas, clari))\nforall x (Dismember(x, silas) and not Shallow(silas) -> not Ossify(x, clari))\nforall x (Hazel(x) and Starch(x, silas) -> Ossify(x, clari))\nforall x (Ossify(x, clari) -> Shallow(clari))\n\nnot Ossify(clari, silas)\n\nforall x (Hazel(x) -> Ossify(x, silas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The eolande catenate the shena. The eolande misjudge the shena. The shena catenate the eolande. The shena is scowling. The shena is unreported. The shena is winking. The shena misjudge the eolande. If someone accede the shena then they need the shena. If someone is unreported then they like the shena. If the eolande is scowling and the eolande catenate the shena then the shena is not persisting. If the eolande misjudge the shena then the eolande catenate the shena. If someone is persisting and they need the shena then the shena misjudge the eolande. If someone misjudge the shena and the shena is not persisting then they do not like the eolande. If someone is unreported and they eat the shena then they like the eolande. If someone accede the eolande then the eolande is persisting. The eolande is persisting.", "logic": "\nCatenate(eolande, shena)\nMisjudge(eolande, shena)\nCatenate(shena, eolande)\nScowling(shena)\nUnreported(shena)\nWinking(shena)\nMisjudge(shena, eolande)\nforall x (Accede(x, shena) -> Misjudge(x, shena))\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Accede(x, shena))\nScowling(eolande) and Catenate(eolande, shena) -> not Persisting(shena)\nMisjudge(eolande, shena) -> Catenate(eolande, shena)\nforall x (Persisting(x) and Misjudge(x, shena) -> Misjudge(shena, eolande))\nforall x (Misjudge(x, shena) and not Persisting(shena) -> not Accede(x, eolande))\nforall x (Unreported(x) and Catenate(x, shena) -> Accede(x, eolande))\nforall x (Accede(x, eolande) -> Persisting(eolande))\n\nPersisting(eolande)\n\nforall x (Accede(x, eolande) -> Persisting(eolande)) <- forall x (Unreported(x) and Catenate(x, shena) -> Accede(x, eolande)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The ailee broil the winfred. The ailee uncouple the winfred. The winfred broil the ailee. The winfred is malapropos. The winfred is bordered. The winfred is carsick. The winfred uncouple the ailee. If someone download the winfred then they need the winfred. If someone is bordered then they like the winfred. If the ailee is malapropos and the ailee broil the winfred then the winfred is not bearing. If the ailee uncouple the winfred then the ailee broil the winfred. If someone is bearing and they need the winfred then the winfred uncouple the ailee. If someone uncouple the winfred and the winfred is not bearing then they do not like the ailee. If someone is bordered and they eat the winfred then they like the ailee. If someone download the ailee then the ailee is bearing. The ailee does not like the ailee.", "logic": "\nBroil(ailee, winfred)\nUncouple(ailee, winfred)\nBroil(winfred, ailee)\nMalapropos(winfred)\nBordered(winfred)\nCarsick(winfred)\nUncouple(winfred, ailee)\nforall x (Download(x, winfred) -> Uncouple(x, winfred))\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Download(x, winfred))\nMalapropos(ailee) and Broil(ailee, winfred) -> not Bearing(winfred)\nUncouple(ailee, winfred) -> Broil(ailee, winfred)\nforall x (Bearing(x) and Uncouple(x, winfred) -> Uncouple(winfred, ailee))\nforall x (Uncouple(x, winfred) and not Bearing(winfred) -> not Download(x, ailee))\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Broil(x, winfred) -> Download(x, ailee))\nforall x (Download(x, ailee) -> Bearing(ailee))\n\nnot Download(ailee, ailee)\n\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Broil(x, winfred) -> Download(x, ailee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The jesse humiliate the elora. The jesse admeasure the elora. The elora humiliate the jesse. The elora is soprano. The elora is healing. The elora is adiabatic. The elora admeasure the jesse. If someone waddle the elora then they need the elora. If someone is healing then they like the elora. If the jesse is soprano and the jesse humiliate the elora then the elora is not reticular. If the jesse admeasure the elora then the jesse humiliate the elora. If someone is reticular and they need the elora then the elora admeasure the jesse. If someone admeasure the elora and the elora is not reticular then they do not like the jesse. If someone is healing and they eat the elora then they like the jesse. If someone waddle the jesse then the jesse is reticular. The jesse is soprano.", "logic": "\nHumiliate(jesse, elora)\nAdmeasure(jesse, elora)\nHumiliate(elora, jesse)\nSoprano(elora)\nHealing(elora)\nAdiabatic(elora)\nAdmeasure(elora, jesse)\nforall x (Waddle(x, elora) -> Admeasure(x, elora))\nforall x (Healing(x) -> Waddle(x, elora))\nSoprano(jesse) and Humiliate(jesse, elora) -> not Reticular(elora)\nAdmeasure(jesse, elora) -> Humiliate(jesse, elora)\nforall x (Reticular(x) and Admeasure(x, elora) -> Admeasure(elora, jesse))\nforall x (Admeasure(x, elora) and not Reticular(elora) -> not Waddle(x, jesse))\nforall x (Healing(x) and Humiliate(x, elora) -> Waddle(x, jesse))\nforall x (Waddle(x, jesse) -> Reticular(jesse))\n\nSoprano(jesse)\n\nSoprano(jesse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The sibley denitrify the ferguson. The sibley grill the ferguson. The ferguson denitrify the sibley. The ferguson is oppressed. The ferguson is unfailing. The ferguson is annalistic. The ferguson grill the sibley. If someone chariot the ferguson then they need the ferguson. If someone is unfailing then they like the ferguson. If the sibley is oppressed and the sibley denitrify the ferguson then the ferguson is not panegyric. If the sibley grill the ferguson then the sibley denitrify the ferguson. If someone is panegyric and they need the ferguson then the ferguson grill the sibley. If someone grill the ferguson and the ferguson is not panegyric then they do not like the sibley. If someone is unfailing and they eat the ferguson then they like the sibley. If someone chariot the sibley then the sibley is panegyric. The sibley is not kind.", "logic": "\nDenitrify(sibley, ferguson)\nGrill(sibley, ferguson)\nDenitrify(ferguson, sibley)\nOppressed(ferguson)\nUnfailing(ferguson)\nAnnalistic(ferguson)\nGrill(ferguson, sibley)\nforall x (Chariot(x, ferguson) -> Grill(x, ferguson))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) -> Chariot(x, ferguson))\nOppressed(sibley) and Denitrify(sibley, ferguson) -> not Panegyric(ferguson)\nGrill(sibley, ferguson) -> Denitrify(sibley, ferguson)\nforall x (Panegyric(x) and Grill(x, ferguson) -> Grill(ferguson, sibley))\nforall x (Grill(x, ferguson) and not Panegyric(ferguson) -> not Chariot(x, sibley))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) and Denitrify(x, ferguson) -> Chariot(x, sibley))\nforall x (Chariot(x, sibley) -> Panegyric(sibley))\n\nnot Kind(sibley)\n\nnot Kind(sibley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "The osbourne ligate the florian. The osbourne outrival the florian. The florian ligate the osbourne. The florian is wiccan. The florian is fizzing. The florian is idyllic. The florian outrival the osbourne. If someone nictate the florian then they need the florian. If someone is fizzing then they like the florian. If the osbourne is wiccan and the osbourne ligate the florian then the florian is not allegoric. If the osbourne outrival the florian then the osbourne ligate the florian. If someone is allegoric and they need the florian then the florian outrival the osbourne. If someone outrival the florian and the florian is not allegoric then they do not like the osbourne. If someone is fizzing and they eat the florian then they like the osbourne. If someone nictate the osbourne then the osbourne is allegoric. The florian is allegoric.", "logic": "\nLigate(osbourne, florian)\nOutrival(osbourne, florian)\nLigate(florian, osbourne)\nWiccan(florian)\nFizzing(florian)\nIdyllic(florian)\nOutrival(florian, osbourne)\nforall x (Nictate(x, florian) -> Outrival(x, florian))\nforall x (Fizzing(x) -> Nictate(x, florian))\nWiccan(osbourne) and Ligate(osbourne, florian) -> not Allegoric(florian)\nOutrival(osbourne, florian) -> Ligate(osbourne, florian)\nforall x (Allegoric(x) and Outrival(x, florian) -> Outrival(florian, osbourne))\nforall x (Outrival(x, florian) and not Allegoric(florian) -> not Nictate(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Fizzing(x) and Ligate(x, florian) -> Nictate(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Nictate(x, osbourne) -> Allegoric(osbourne))\n\nAllegoric(florian)\n\nAllegoric(florian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-17"} {"premises": "Ernestine is botonnee. Ernestine is brimming. Ernestine is grumbling. Green, unreserved things are reasoned. All botonnee, grumbling things are unreserved. Ernestine is brimming.", "logic": "\nBotonnee(ernestine)\nBrimming(ernestine)\nGrumbling(ernestine)\nforall x (Botonnee(x) and Unreserved(x) -> Reasoned(x))\nforall x (Botonnee(x) and Grumbling(x) -> Unreserved(x))\n\nBrimming(ernestine)\n\ntherefore Brimming(ernestine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Vance is gaunt. Vance is denudate. Vance is unhatched. Green, grueling things are refractory. All gaunt, unhatched things are grueling. Vance is not denudate.", "logic": "\nGaunt(vance)\nDenudate(vance)\nUnhatched(vance)\nforall x (Gaunt(x) and Grueling(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Gaunt(x) and Unhatched(x) -> Grueling(x))\n\nnot Denudate(vance)\n\ntherefore Denudate(vance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Larina is jerky. Larina is crossed. Larina is extra. Green, damning things are calloused. All jerky, extra things are damning. Larina is damning.", "logic": "\nJerky(larina)\nCrossed(larina)\nExtra(larina)\nforall x (Jerky(x) and Damning(x) -> Calloused(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) and Extra(x) -> Damning(x))\n\nDamning(larina)\n\nJerky(larina) and Extra(larina) and forall x (Jerky(x) and Extra(x) -> Damning(x)) -> therefore Damning(larina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Rochelle is conceptual. Rochelle is nifty. Rochelle is comradely. Green, flyblown things are bust. All conceptual, comradely things are flyblown. Rochelle is not flyblown.", "logic": "\nConceptual(rochelle)\nNifty(rochelle)\nComradely(rochelle)\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Flyblown(x) -> Bust(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Comradely(x) -> Flyblown(x))\n\nnot Flyblown(rochelle)\n\nConceptual(rochelle) and Comradely(rochelle) and forall x (Conceptual(x) and Comradely(x) -> Flyblown(x)) -> therefore Flyblown(rochelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Silvain is noseless. Silvain is seraphical. Silvain is custodial. Green, sandy things are acritical. All noseless, custodial things are sandy. Silvain is acritical.", "logic": "\nNoseless(silvain)\nSeraphical(silvain)\nCustodial(silvain)\nforall x (Noseless(x) and Sandy(x) -> Acritical(x))\nforall x (Noseless(x) and Custodial(x) -> Sandy(x))\n\nAcritical(silvain)\n\nNoseless(silvain) and Custodial(silvain) and forall x (Noseless(x) and Custodial(x) -> Sandy(x)) -> therefore Sandy(silvain) Noseless(silvain) and Sandy(silvain) and forall x (Noseless(x) and Sandy(x) -> Acritical(x)) -> therefore Acritical(silvain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Nadine is immobile. Nadine is documental. Nadine is distinct. Green, ungroomed things are ominous. All immobile, distinct things are ungroomed. Nadine is not ominous.", "logic": "\nImmobile(nadine)\nDocumental(nadine)\nDistinct(nadine)\nforall x (Immobile(x) and Ungroomed(x) -> Ominous(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) and Distinct(x) -> Ungroomed(x))\n\nnot Ominous(nadine)\n\nImmobile(nadine) and Distinct(nadine) and forall x (Immobile(x) and Distinct(x) -> Ungroomed(x)) -> therefore Ungroomed(nadine) Immobile(nadine) and Ungroomed(nadine) and forall x (Immobile(x) and Ungroomed(x) -> Ominous(x)) -> therefore Ominous(nadine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Barclay is resident. Barclay is hominian. Barclay is wordless. Green, abyssal things are color. All resident, wordless things are abyssal. Barclay is not cold.", "logic": "\nResident(barclay)\nHominian(barclay)\nWordless(barclay)\nforall x (Resident(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Color(x))\nforall x (Resident(x) and Wordless(x) -> Abyssal(x))\n\nnot Cold(barclay)\n\nnot Cold(barclay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Loren is articular. Loren is scaphoid. Loren is rosy. Green, erogenous things are coarctate. All articular, rosy things are erogenous. Loren is young.", "logic": "\nArticular(loren)\nScaphoid(loren)\nRosy(loren)\nforall x (Articular(x) and Erogenous(x) -> Coarctate(x))\nforall x (Articular(x) and Rosy(x) -> Erogenous(x))\n\nYoung(loren)\n\nYoung(loren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Terence is normal. Leisha is alterative. Leisha is normal. Penelope is normal. Penelope is dextrous. Collin is accessory. Collin is not normal. Round, normal people are alterative. If someone is dextrous and alterative then they are fossilised. Collin is accessory.", "logic": "\nNormal(terence)\nAlterative(leisha)\nNormal(leisha)\nNormal(penelope)\nDextrous(penelope)\nAccessory(collin)\nnot Normal(collin)\nforall x (Dextrous(x) and Normal(x) -> Alterative(x))\nforall x (Dextrous(x) and Alterative(x) -> Fossilised(x))\n\nAccessory(collin)\n\ntherefore Accessory(collin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Elayne is cackly. Selena is underdone. Selena is cackly. Sonia is cackly. Sonia is basaltic. Ingunna is internal. Ingunna is not cackly. Round, cackly people are underdone. If someone is basaltic and underdone then they are anagogic. Sonia is not basaltic.", "logic": "\nCackly(elayne)\nUnderdone(selena)\nCackly(selena)\nCackly(sonia)\nBasaltic(sonia)\nInternal(ingunna)\nnot Cackly(ingunna)\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Cackly(x) -> Underdone(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Underdone(x) -> Anagogic(x))\n\nnot Basaltic(sonia)\n\ntherefore Basaltic(sonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Jyoti is tentacular. Chelton is exulting. Chelton is tentacular. Fanny is tentacular. Fanny is unpledged. Drea is undirected. Drea is not tentacular. Round, tentacular people are exulting. If someone is unpledged and exulting then they are slithery. Fanny is exulting.", "logic": "\nTentacular(jyoti)\nExulting(chelton)\nTentacular(chelton)\nTentacular(fanny)\nUnpledged(fanny)\nUndirected(drea)\nnot Tentacular(drea)\nforall x (Unpledged(x) and Tentacular(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Unpledged(x) and Exulting(x) -> Slithery(x))\n\nExulting(fanny)\n\nUnpledged(fanny) and Tentacular(fanny) and forall x (Unpledged(x) and Tentacular(x) -> Exulting(x)) -> therefore Exulting(fanny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Waylan is crescent. Ephram is megalithic. Ephram is crescent. Guthry is crescent. Guthry is pharaonic. Koressa is brutish. Koressa is not crescent. Round, crescent people are megalithic. If someone is pharaonic and megalithic then they are barometric. Guthry is not megalithic.", "logic": "\nCrescent(waylan)\nMegalithic(ephram)\nCrescent(ephram)\nCrescent(guthry)\nPharaonic(guthry)\nBrutish(koressa)\nnot Crescent(koressa)\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and Crescent(x) -> Megalithic(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and Megalithic(x) -> Barometric(x))\n\nnot Megalithic(guthry)\n\nPharaonic(guthry) and Crescent(guthry) and forall x (Pharaonic(x) and Crescent(x) -> Megalithic(x)) -> therefore Megalithic(guthry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Nathaniel is shortened. Wileen is equal. Wileen is shortened. Cordelia is shortened. Cordelia is uninominal. Benton is graduate. Benton is not shortened. Round, shortened people are equal. If someone is uninominal and equal then they are negroid. Cordelia is negroid.", "logic": "\nShortened(nathaniel)\nEqual(wileen)\nShortened(wileen)\nShortened(cordelia)\nUninominal(cordelia)\nGraduate(benton)\nnot Shortened(benton)\nforall x (Uninominal(x) and Shortened(x) -> Equal(x))\nforall x (Uninominal(x) and Equal(x) -> Negroid(x))\n\nNegroid(cordelia)\n\nUninominal(cordelia) and Shortened(cordelia) and forall x (Uninominal(x) and Shortened(x) -> Equal(x)) -> therefore Equal(cordelia) Uninominal(cordelia) and Equal(cordelia) and forall x (Uninominal(x) and Equal(x) -> Negroid(x)) -> therefore Negroid(cordelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Shumeet is taking. Marney is squeaking. Marney is taking. Willi is taking. Willi is uncoloured. Zacharia is injured. Zacharia is not taking. Round, taking people are squeaking. If someone is uncoloured and squeaking then they are invertible. Willi is not invertible.", "logic": "\nTaking(shumeet)\nSqueaking(marney)\nTaking(marney)\nTaking(willi)\nUncoloured(willi)\nInjured(zacharia)\nnot Taking(zacharia)\nforall x (Uncoloured(x) and Taking(x) -> Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Uncoloured(x) and Squeaking(x) -> Invertible(x))\n\nnot Invertible(willi)\n\nUncoloured(willi) and Taking(willi) and forall x (Uncoloured(x) and Taking(x) -> Squeaking(x)) -> therefore Squeaking(willi) Uncoloured(willi) and Squeaking(willi) and forall x (Uncoloured(x) and Squeaking(x) -> Invertible(x)) -> therefore Invertible(willi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Hersh is polyoicous. Veronike is nonverbal. Veronike is polyoicous. Humphrey is polyoicous. Humphrey is unsolvable. Dore is aliphatic. Dore is not polyoicous. Round, polyoicous people are nonverbal. If someone is unsolvable and nonverbal then they are amethyst. Dore is not nonverbal.", "logic": "\nPolyoicous(hersh)\nNonverbal(veronike)\nPolyoicous(veronike)\nPolyoicous(humphrey)\nUnsolvable(humphrey)\nAliphatic(dore)\nnot Polyoicous(dore)\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) and Polyoicous(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) and Nonverbal(x) -> Amethyst(x))\n\nnot Nonverbal(dore)\n\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) and Polyoicous(x) -> Nonverbal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Reagan is filmable. Nike is unneurotic. Nike is filmable. Georgina is filmable. Georgina is ignored. Chase is flighted. Chase is not filmable. Round, filmable people are unneurotic. If someone is ignored and unneurotic then they are disjoined. Reagan is disjoined.", "logic": "\nFilmable(reagan)\nUnneurotic(nike)\nFilmable(nike)\nFilmable(georgina)\nIgnored(georgina)\nFlighted(chase)\nnot Filmable(chase)\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Filmable(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Unneurotic(x) -> Disjoined(x))\n\nDisjoined(reagan)\n\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Unneurotic(x) -> Disjoined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Rivkah is parallel. Dulcine is alchemical. Dulcine is parallel. Nani is parallel. Nani is plebeian. Desmond is thyrotoxic. Desmond is not parallel. Round, parallel people are alchemical. If someone is plebeian and alchemical then they are gymnastic. Rivkah is not alchemical.", "logic": "\nParallel(rivkah)\nAlchemical(dulcine)\nParallel(dulcine)\nParallel(nani)\nPlebeian(nani)\nThyrotoxic(desmond)\nnot Parallel(desmond)\nforall x (Plebeian(x) and Parallel(x) -> Alchemical(x))\nforall x (Plebeian(x) and Alchemical(x) -> Gymnastic(x))\n\nnot Alchemical(rivkah)\n\nforall x (Plebeian(x) and Parallel(x) -> Alchemical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Barbee is incurved. Janaya is coherent. Janaya is incurved. Horace is incurved. Horace is dyslexic. Sean is misshapen. Sean is not incurved. Round, incurved people are coherent. If someone is dyslexic and coherent then they are avirulent. Sean is kind.", "logic": "\nIncurved(barbee)\nCoherent(janaya)\nIncurved(janaya)\nIncurved(horace)\nDyslexic(horace)\nMisshapen(sean)\nnot Incurved(sean)\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) and Incurved(x) -> Coherent(x))\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) and Coherent(x) -> Avirulent(x))\n\nKind(sean)\n\nKind(sean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Sanson is understood. Ula is immortal. Ula is understood. Burke is understood. Burke is emotional. Denna is angolan. Denna is not understood. Round, understood people are immortal. If someone is emotional and immortal then they are immunized. Ula is not quiet.", "logic": "\nUnderstood(sanson)\nImmortal(ula)\nUnderstood(ula)\nUnderstood(burke)\nEmotional(burke)\nAngolan(denna)\nnot Understood(denna)\nforall x (Emotional(x) and Understood(x) -> Immortal(x))\nforall x (Emotional(x) and Immortal(x) -> Immunized(x))\n\nnot Quiet(ula)\n\nnot Quiet(ula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "Ethelda is shopsoiled. Hyacinthe is cliquish. Hyacinthe is shopsoiled. Sax is shopsoiled. Sax is silicious. Lottie is polyvalent. Lottie is not shopsoiled. Round, shopsoiled people are cliquish. If someone is silicious and cliquish then they are elfish. Sax is kind.", "logic": "\nShopsoiled(ethelda)\nCliquish(hyacinthe)\nShopsoiled(hyacinthe)\nShopsoiled(sax)\nSilicious(sax)\nPolyvalent(lottie)\nnot Shopsoiled(lottie)\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Shopsoiled(x) -> Cliquish(x))\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Cliquish(x) -> Elfish(x))\n\nKind(sax)\n\nKind(sax) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-880"} {"premises": "The penelope outguess the gusta. The penelope is careworn. The penelope is sectional. The penelope pestle the gusta. The lianna outguess the penelope. The lianna is careworn. The lianna pestle the penelope. The lianna pestle the gusta. The gusta puncture the penelope. The gusta is flint. The gusta is lxiii. The gusta pestle the penelope. If the penelope puncture the gusta and the gusta is flint then the gusta outguess the penelope. If something puncture the penelope then it does not like the gusta. If the penelope pestle the gusta then the penelope puncture the gusta. If the gusta outguess the lianna and the penelope does not like the gusta then the penelope outguess the gusta. If the penelope outguess the gusta and the gusta does not eat the penelope then the gusta does not like the lianna. If something is retracted and it pestle the lianna then the lianna pestle the gusta. The lianna outguess the penelope.", "logic": "\nOutguess(penelope, gusta)\nCareworn(penelope)\nSectional(penelope)\nPestle(penelope, gusta)\nOutguess(lianna, penelope)\nCareworn(lianna)\nPestle(lianna, penelope)\nPestle(lianna, gusta)\nPuncture(gusta, penelope)\nFlint(gusta)\nLxiii(gusta)\nPestle(gusta, penelope)\nPuncture(penelope, gusta) and Flint(gusta) -> Outguess(gusta, penelope)\nforall x (Puncture(x, penelope) -> not Pestle(x, gusta))\nPestle(penelope, gusta) -> Puncture(penelope, gusta)\nOutguess(gusta, lianna) and not Pestle(penelope, gusta) -> Outguess(penelope, gusta)\nOutguess(penelope, gusta) and not Outguess(gusta, penelope) -> not Pestle(gusta, lianna)\nforall x (Retracted(x) and Pestle(x, lianna) -> Pestle(lianna, gusta))\n\nOutguess(lianna, penelope)\n\ntherefore Outguess(lianna, penelope)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The eveleen retie the winn. The eveleen is invasive. The eveleen is paranormal. The eveleen prefigure the winn. The doro retie the eveleen. The doro is invasive. The doro prefigure the eveleen. The doro prefigure the winn. The winn afford the eveleen. The winn is uptight. The winn is visualized. The winn prefigure the eveleen. If the eveleen afford the winn and the winn is uptight then the winn retie the eveleen. If something afford the eveleen then it does not like the winn. If the eveleen prefigure the winn then the eveleen afford the winn. If the winn retie the doro and the eveleen does not like the winn then the eveleen retie the winn. If the eveleen retie the winn and the winn does not eat the eveleen then the winn does not like the doro. If something is panoplied and it prefigure the doro then the doro prefigure the winn. The doro is not invasive.", "logic": "\nRetie(eveleen, winn)\nInvasive(eveleen)\nParanormal(eveleen)\nPrefigure(eveleen, winn)\nRetie(doro, eveleen)\nInvasive(doro)\nPrefigure(doro, eveleen)\nPrefigure(doro, winn)\nAfford(winn, eveleen)\nUptight(winn)\nVisualized(winn)\nPrefigure(winn, eveleen)\nAfford(eveleen, winn) and Uptight(winn) -> Retie(winn, eveleen)\nforall x (Afford(x, eveleen) -> not Prefigure(x, winn))\nPrefigure(eveleen, winn) -> Afford(eveleen, winn)\nRetie(winn, doro) and not Prefigure(eveleen, winn) -> Retie(eveleen, winn)\nRetie(eveleen, winn) and not Retie(winn, eveleen) -> not Prefigure(winn, doro)\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and Prefigure(x, doro) -> Prefigure(doro, winn))\n\nnot Invasive(doro)\n\ntherefore Invasive(doro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The lorena reline the herta. The lorena is pebbly. The lorena is starlike. The lorena probate the herta. The jessey reline the lorena. The jessey is pebbly. The jessey probate the lorena. The jessey probate the herta. The herta enervate the lorena. The herta is untactful. The herta is blistery. The herta probate the lorena. If the lorena enervate the herta and the herta is untactful then the herta reline the lorena. If something enervate the lorena then it does not like the herta. If the lorena probate the herta then the lorena enervate the herta. If the herta reline the jessey and the lorena does not like the herta then the lorena reline the herta. If the lorena reline the herta and the herta does not eat the lorena then the herta does not like the jessey. If something is festal and it probate the jessey then the jessey probate the herta. The lorena enervate the herta.", "logic": "\nReline(lorena, herta)\nPebbly(lorena)\nStarlike(lorena)\nProbate(lorena, herta)\nReline(jessey, lorena)\nPebbly(jessey)\nProbate(jessey, lorena)\nProbate(jessey, herta)\nEnervate(herta, lorena)\nUntactful(herta)\nBlistery(herta)\nProbate(herta, lorena)\nEnervate(lorena, herta) and Untactful(herta) -> Reline(herta, lorena)\nforall x (Enervate(x, lorena) -> not Probate(x, herta))\nProbate(lorena, herta) -> Enervate(lorena, herta)\nReline(herta, jessey) and not Probate(lorena, herta) -> Reline(lorena, herta)\nReline(lorena, herta) and not Reline(herta, lorena) -> not Probate(herta, jessey)\nforall x (Festal(x) and Probate(x, jessey) -> Probate(jessey, herta))\n\nEnervate(lorena, herta)\n\nProbate(lorena, herta) and Probate(lorena, herta) -> Enervate(lorena, herta) -> therefore Enervate(lorena, herta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The almire cavern the kaiser. The almire is custom. The almire is slavelike. The almire gird the kaiser. The luise cavern the almire. The luise is custom. The luise gird the almire. The luise gird the kaiser. The kaiser mortify the almire. The kaiser is exilic. The kaiser is posthumous. The kaiser gird the almire. If the almire mortify the kaiser and the kaiser is exilic then the kaiser cavern the almire. If something mortify the almire then it does not like the kaiser. If the almire gird the kaiser then the almire mortify the kaiser. If the kaiser cavern the luise and the almire does not like the kaiser then the almire cavern the kaiser. If the almire cavern the kaiser and the kaiser does not eat the almire then the kaiser does not like the luise. If something is intuitive and it gird the luise then the luise gird the kaiser. The kaiser gird the kaiser.", "logic": "\nCavern(almire, kaiser)\nCustom(almire)\nSlavelike(almire)\nGird(almire, kaiser)\nCavern(luise, almire)\nCustom(luise)\nGird(luise, almire)\nGird(luise, kaiser)\nMortify(kaiser, almire)\nExilic(kaiser)\nPosthumous(kaiser)\nGird(kaiser, almire)\nMortify(almire, kaiser) and Exilic(kaiser) -> Cavern(kaiser, almire)\nforall x (Mortify(x, almire) -> not Gird(x, kaiser))\nGird(almire, kaiser) -> Mortify(almire, kaiser)\nCavern(kaiser, luise) and not Gird(almire, kaiser) -> Cavern(almire, kaiser)\nCavern(almire, kaiser) and not Cavern(kaiser, almire) -> not Gird(kaiser, luise)\nforall x (Intuitive(x) and Gird(x, luise) -> Gird(luise, kaiser))\n\nGird(kaiser, kaiser)\n\nMortify(kaiser, almire) and forall x (Mortify(x, almire) -> not Gird(x, kaiser)) -> therefore not Gird(kaiser, kaiser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The kaiser track the tate. The kaiser is sumptuous. The kaiser is savage. The kaiser dung the tate. The phil track the kaiser. The phil is sumptuous. The phil dung the kaiser. The phil dung the tate. The tate instrument the kaiser. The tate is galvanic. The tate is drastic. The tate dung the kaiser. If the kaiser instrument the tate and the tate is galvanic then the tate track the kaiser. If something instrument the kaiser then it does not like the tate. If the kaiser dung the tate then the kaiser instrument the tate. If the tate track the phil and the kaiser does not like the tate then the kaiser track the tate. If the kaiser track the tate and the tate does not eat the kaiser then the tate does not like the phil. If something is untied and it dung the phil then the phil dung the tate. The tate track the kaiser.", "logic": "\nTrack(kaiser, tate)\nSumptuous(kaiser)\nSavage(kaiser)\nDung(kaiser, tate)\nTrack(phil, kaiser)\nSumptuous(phil)\nDung(phil, kaiser)\nDung(phil, tate)\nInstrument(tate, kaiser)\nGalvanic(tate)\nDrastic(tate)\nDung(tate, kaiser)\nInstrument(kaiser, tate) and Galvanic(tate) -> Track(tate, kaiser)\nforall x (Instrument(x, kaiser) -> not Dung(x, tate))\nDung(kaiser, tate) -> Instrument(kaiser, tate)\nTrack(tate, phil) and not Dung(kaiser, tate) -> Track(kaiser, tate)\nTrack(kaiser, tate) and not Track(tate, kaiser) -> not Dung(tate, phil)\nforall x (Untied(x) and Dung(x, phil) -> Dung(phil, tate))\n\nTrack(tate, kaiser)\n\nDung(kaiser, tate) and Dung(kaiser, tate) -> Instrument(kaiser, tate) -> therefore Instrument(kaiser, tate) Instrument(kaiser, tate) and Galvanic(tate) and Instrument(kaiser, tate) and Galvanic(tate) -> Track(tate, kaiser) -> therefore Track(tate, kaiser)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The madalena reactivate the hamish. The madalena is exulting. The madalena is swayback. The madalena aphorize the hamish. The suzette reactivate the madalena. The suzette is exulting. The suzette aphorize the madalena. The suzette aphorize the hamish. The hamish apprize the madalena. The hamish is sigmoidal. The hamish is diaphanous. The hamish aphorize the madalena. If the madalena apprize the hamish and the hamish is sigmoidal then the hamish reactivate the madalena. If something apprize the madalena then it does not like the hamish. If the madalena aphorize the hamish then the madalena apprize the hamish. If the hamish reactivate the suzette and the madalena does not like the hamish then the madalena reactivate the hamish. If the madalena reactivate the hamish and the hamish does not eat the madalena then the hamish does not like the suzette. If something is wasted and it aphorize the suzette then the suzette aphorize the hamish. The hamish does not eat the madalena.", "logic": "\nReactivate(madalena, hamish)\nExulting(madalena)\nSwayback(madalena)\nAphorize(madalena, hamish)\nReactivate(suzette, madalena)\nExulting(suzette)\nAphorize(suzette, madalena)\nAphorize(suzette, hamish)\nApprize(hamish, madalena)\nSigmoidal(hamish)\nDiaphanous(hamish)\nAphorize(hamish, madalena)\nApprize(madalena, hamish) and Sigmoidal(hamish) -> Reactivate(hamish, madalena)\nforall x (Apprize(x, madalena) -> not Aphorize(x, hamish))\nAphorize(madalena, hamish) -> Apprize(madalena, hamish)\nReactivate(hamish, suzette) and not Aphorize(madalena, hamish) -> Reactivate(madalena, hamish)\nReactivate(madalena, hamish) and not Reactivate(hamish, madalena) -> not Aphorize(hamish, suzette)\nforall x (Wasted(x) and Aphorize(x, suzette) -> Aphorize(suzette, hamish))\n\nnot Reactivate(hamish, madalena)\n\nAphorize(madalena, hamish) and Aphorize(madalena, hamish) -> Apprize(madalena, hamish) -> therefore Apprize(madalena, hamish) Apprize(madalena, hamish) and Sigmoidal(hamish) and Apprize(madalena, hamish) and Sigmoidal(hamish) -> Reactivate(hamish, madalena) -> therefore Reactivate(hamish, madalena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The janifer ghettoise the melessa. The janifer is chlamydial. The janifer is impish. The janifer tile the melessa. The stew ghettoise the janifer. The stew is chlamydial. The stew tile the janifer. The stew tile the melessa. The melessa obey the janifer. The melessa is zolaesque. The melessa is peaky. The melessa tile the janifer. If the janifer obey the melessa and the melessa is zolaesque then the melessa ghettoise the janifer. If something obey the janifer then it does not like the melessa. If the janifer tile the melessa then the janifer obey the melessa. If the melessa ghettoise the stew and the janifer does not like the melessa then the janifer ghettoise the melessa. If the janifer ghettoise the melessa and the melessa does not eat the janifer then the melessa does not like the stew. If something is forward and it tile the stew then the stew tile the melessa. The melessa does not eat the melessa.", "logic": "\nGhettoise(janifer, melessa)\nChlamydial(janifer)\nImpish(janifer)\nTile(janifer, melessa)\nGhettoise(stew, janifer)\nChlamydial(stew)\nTile(stew, janifer)\nTile(stew, melessa)\nObey(melessa, janifer)\nZolaesque(melessa)\nPeaky(melessa)\nTile(melessa, janifer)\nObey(janifer, melessa) and Zolaesque(melessa) -> Ghettoise(melessa, janifer)\nforall x (Obey(x, janifer) -> not Tile(x, melessa))\nTile(janifer, melessa) -> Obey(janifer, melessa)\nGhettoise(melessa, stew) and not Tile(janifer, melessa) -> Ghettoise(janifer, melessa)\nGhettoise(janifer, melessa) and not Ghettoise(melessa, janifer) -> not Tile(melessa, stew)\nforall x (Forward(x) and Tile(x, stew) -> Tile(stew, melessa))\n\nnot Ghettoise(melessa, melessa)\n\nnot Ghettoise(melessa, melessa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The del premise the lauri. The del is unended. The del is ergonomic. The del overrule the lauri. The chase premise the del. The chase is unended. The chase overrule the del. The chase overrule the lauri. The lauri vesiculate the del. The lauri is arenaceous. The lauri is judicial. The lauri overrule the del. If the del vesiculate the lauri and the lauri is arenaceous then the lauri premise the del. If something vesiculate the del then it does not like the lauri. If the del overrule the lauri then the del vesiculate the lauri. If the lauri premise the chase and the del does not like the lauri then the del premise the lauri. If the del premise the lauri and the lauri does not eat the del then the lauri does not like the chase. If something is changed and it overrule the chase then the chase overrule the lauri. The chase is arenaceous.", "logic": "\nPremise(del, lauri)\nUnended(del)\nErgonomic(del)\nOverrule(del, lauri)\nPremise(chase, del)\nUnended(chase)\nOverrule(chase, del)\nOverrule(chase, lauri)\nVesiculate(lauri, del)\nArenaceous(lauri)\nJudicial(lauri)\nOverrule(lauri, del)\nVesiculate(del, lauri) and Arenaceous(lauri) -> Premise(lauri, del)\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, del) -> not Overrule(x, lauri))\nOverrule(del, lauri) -> Vesiculate(del, lauri)\nPremise(lauri, chase) and not Overrule(del, lauri) -> Premise(del, lauri)\nPremise(del, lauri) and not Premise(lauri, del) -> not Overrule(lauri, chase)\nforall x (Changed(x) and Overrule(x, chase) -> Overrule(chase, lauri))\n\nArenaceous(chase)\n\nArenaceous(chase) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The karly dishevel the town. The karly is polar. The karly is vicarial. The karly intensify the town. The ward dishevel the karly. The ward is polar. The ward intensify the karly. The ward intensify the town. The town undrape the karly. The town is attrited. The town is shoddy. The town intensify the karly. If the karly undrape the town and the town is attrited then the town dishevel the karly. If something undrape the karly then it does not like the town. If the karly intensify the town then the karly undrape the town. If the town dishevel the ward and the karly does not like the town then the karly dishevel the town. If the karly dishevel the town and the town does not eat the karly then the town does not like the ward. If something is untilled and it intensify the ward then the ward intensify the town. The ward does not chase the karly.", "logic": "\nDishevel(karly, town)\nPolar(karly)\nVicarial(karly)\nIntensify(karly, town)\nDishevel(ward, karly)\nPolar(ward)\nIntensify(ward, karly)\nIntensify(ward, town)\nUndrape(town, karly)\nAttrited(town)\nShoddy(town)\nIntensify(town, karly)\nUndrape(karly, town) and Attrited(town) -> Dishevel(town, karly)\nforall x (Undrape(x, karly) -> not Intensify(x, town))\nIntensify(karly, town) -> Undrape(karly, town)\nDishevel(town, ward) and not Intensify(karly, town) -> Dishevel(karly, town)\nDishevel(karly, town) and not Dishevel(town, karly) -> not Intensify(town, ward)\nforall x (Untilled(x) and Intensify(x, ward) -> Intensify(ward, town))\n\nnot Undrape(ward, karly)\n\nnot Undrape(ward, karly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The corina embarrass the donna. The corina is unschooled. The corina is concerned. The corina inveigle the donna. The shane embarrass the corina. The shane is unschooled. The shane inveigle the corina. The shane inveigle the donna. The donna candle the corina. The donna is rolled. The donna is dietetic. The donna inveigle the corina. If the corina candle the donna and the donna is rolled then the donna embarrass the corina. If something candle the corina then it does not like the donna. If the corina inveigle the donna then the corina candle the donna. If the donna embarrass the shane and the corina does not like the donna then the corina embarrass the donna. If the corina embarrass the donna and the donna does not eat the corina then the donna does not like the shane. If something is geophytic and it inveigle the shane then the shane inveigle the donna. The corina embarrass the shane.", "logic": "\nEmbarrass(corina, donna)\nUnschooled(corina)\nConcerned(corina)\nInveigle(corina, donna)\nEmbarrass(shane, corina)\nUnschooled(shane)\nInveigle(shane, corina)\nInveigle(shane, donna)\nCandle(donna, corina)\nRolled(donna)\nDietetic(donna)\nInveigle(donna, corina)\nCandle(corina, donna) and Rolled(donna) -> Embarrass(donna, corina)\nforall x (Candle(x, corina) -> not Inveigle(x, donna))\nInveigle(corina, donna) -> Candle(corina, donna)\nEmbarrass(donna, shane) and not Inveigle(corina, donna) -> Embarrass(corina, donna)\nEmbarrass(corina, donna) and not Embarrass(donna, corina) -> not Inveigle(donna, shane)\nforall x (Geophytic(x) and Inveigle(x, shane) -> Inveigle(shane, donna))\n\nEmbarrass(corina, shane)\n\nEmbarrass(corina, shane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The lilia rasterize the maudie. The lilia is achromatic. The lilia is subsurface. The lilia misspell the maudie. The beatrice rasterize the lilia. The beatrice is achromatic. The beatrice misspell the lilia. The beatrice misspell the maudie. The maudie cauterise the lilia. The maudie is honey. The maudie is disputed. The maudie misspell the lilia. If the lilia cauterise the maudie and the maudie is honey then the maudie rasterize the lilia. If something cauterise the lilia then it does not like the maudie. If the lilia misspell the maudie then the lilia cauterise the maudie. If the maudie rasterize the beatrice and the lilia does not like the maudie then the lilia rasterize the maudie. If the lilia rasterize the maudie and the maudie does not eat the lilia then the maudie does not like the beatrice. If something is unchanging and it misspell the beatrice then the beatrice misspell the maudie. The maudie does not like the beatrice.", "logic": "\nRasterize(lilia, maudie)\nAchromatic(lilia)\nSubsurface(lilia)\nMisspell(lilia, maudie)\nRasterize(beatrice, lilia)\nAchromatic(beatrice)\nMisspell(beatrice, lilia)\nMisspell(beatrice, maudie)\nCauterise(maudie, lilia)\nHoney(maudie)\nDisputed(maudie)\nMisspell(maudie, lilia)\nCauterise(lilia, maudie) and Honey(maudie) -> Rasterize(maudie, lilia)\nforall x (Cauterise(x, lilia) -> not Misspell(x, maudie))\nMisspell(lilia, maudie) -> Cauterise(lilia, maudie)\nRasterize(maudie, beatrice) and not Misspell(lilia, maudie) -> Rasterize(lilia, maudie)\nRasterize(lilia, maudie) and not Rasterize(maudie, lilia) -> not Misspell(maudie, beatrice)\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and Misspell(x, beatrice) -> Misspell(beatrice, maudie))\n\nnot Misspell(maudie, beatrice)\n\nnot Misspell(maudie, beatrice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "The elise remake the roman. The elise is nonsexual. The elise is bellied. The elise chelate the roman. The andreana remake the elise. The andreana is nonsexual. The andreana chelate the elise. The andreana chelate the roman. The roman nullify the elise. The roman is brunet. The roman is sopranino. The roman chelate the elise. If the elise nullify the roman and the roman is brunet then the roman remake the elise. If something nullify the elise then it does not like the roman. If the elise chelate the roman then the elise nullify the roman. If the roman remake the andreana and the elise does not like the roman then the elise remake the roman. If the elise remake the roman and the roman does not eat the elise then the roman does not like the andreana. If something is cilial and it chelate the andreana then the andreana chelate the roman. The elise is brunet.", "logic": "\nRemake(elise, roman)\nNonsexual(elise)\nBellied(elise)\nChelate(elise, roman)\nRemake(andreana, elise)\nNonsexual(andreana)\nChelate(andreana, elise)\nChelate(andreana, roman)\nNullify(roman, elise)\nBrunet(roman)\nSopranino(roman)\nChelate(roman, elise)\nNullify(elise, roman) and Brunet(roman) -> Remake(roman, elise)\nforall x (Nullify(x, elise) -> not Chelate(x, roman))\nChelate(elise, roman) -> Nullify(elise, roman)\nRemake(roman, andreana) and not Chelate(elise, roman) -> Remake(elise, roman)\nRemake(elise, roman) and not Remake(roman, elise) -> not Chelate(roman, andreana)\nforall x (Cilial(x) and Chelate(x, andreana) -> Chelate(andreana, roman))\n\nBrunet(elise)\n\nBrunet(elise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1184"} {"premises": "Daisie is poky. Zuzana is not downbound. Barny is poky. If Daisie is prompt then Daisie is downbound. Furry things are separable. All poky things are prompt. Barny is poky.", "logic": "\nPoky(daisie)\nnot Downbound(zuzana)\nPoky(barny)\nPrompt(daisie) -> Downbound(daisie)\nforall x (Prompt(x) -> Separable(x))\nforall x (Poky(x) -> Prompt(x))\n\nPoky(barny)\n\ntherefore Poky(barny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Tarrah is theist. Carmella is not grey. Nettle is theist. If Tarrah is ventral then Tarrah is grey. Furry things are curious. All theist things are ventral. Nettle is not theist.", "logic": "\nTheist(tarrah)\nnot Grey(carmella)\nTheist(nettle)\nVentral(tarrah) -> Grey(tarrah)\nforall x (Ventral(x) -> Curious(x))\nforall x (Theist(x) -> Ventral(x))\n\nnot Theist(nettle)\n\ntherefore Theist(nettle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Ritchie is nonstop. Allis is not itchy. Dusty is nonstop. If Ritchie is caudal then Ritchie is itchy. Furry things are balsamic. All nonstop things are caudal. Ritchie is caudal.", "logic": "\nNonstop(ritchie)\nnot Itchy(allis)\nNonstop(dusty)\nCaudal(ritchie) -> Itchy(ritchie)\nforall x (Caudal(x) -> Balsamic(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) -> Caudal(x))\n\nCaudal(ritchie)\n\nNonstop(ritchie) and forall x (Nonstop(x) -> Caudal(x)) -> therefore Caudal(ritchie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Burnaby is cheeky. Catharina is not tetragonal. Karolina is cheeky. If Burnaby is muhammadan then Burnaby is tetragonal. Furry things are forficate. All cheeky things are muhammadan. Karolina is not muhammadan.", "logic": "\nCheeky(burnaby)\nnot Tetragonal(catharina)\nCheeky(karolina)\nMuhammadan(burnaby) -> Tetragonal(burnaby)\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> Muhammadan(x))\n\nnot Muhammadan(karolina)\n\nCheeky(karolina) and forall x (Cheeky(x) -> Muhammadan(x)) -> therefore Muhammadan(karolina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Taylor is stereo. Joana is not disjunct. Lyndel is stereo. If Taylor is plugged then Taylor is disjunct. Furry things are piscatory. All stereo things are plugged. Taylor is piscatory.", "logic": "\nStereo(taylor)\nnot Disjunct(joana)\nStereo(lyndel)\nPlugged(taylor) -> Disjunct(taylor)\nforall x (Plugged(x) -> Piscatory(x))\nforall x (Stereo(x) -> Plugged(x))\n\nPiscatory(taylor)\n\nStereo(taylor) and forall x (Stereo(x) -> Plugged(x)) -> therefore Plugged(taylor) Plugged(taylor) and forall x (Plugged(x) -> Piscatory(x)) -> therefore Piscatory(taylor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Giralda is matchless. Randee is not equipped. Margette is matchless. If Giralda is graspable then Giralda is equipped. Furry things are bellied. All matchless things are graspable. Giralda is not bellied.", "logic": "\nMatchless(giralda)\nnot Equipped(randee)\nMatchless(margette)\nGraspable(giralda) -> Equipped(giralda)\nforall x (Graspable(x) -> Bellied(x))\nforall x (Matchless(x) -> Graspable(x))\n\nnot Bellied(giralda)\n\nMatchless(giralda) and forall x (Matchless(x) -> Graspable(x)) -> therefore Graspable(giralda) Graspable(giralda) and forall x (Graspable(x) -> Bellied(x)) -> therefore Bellied(giralda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Terrill is osseous. Robyn is not suckled. Amery is osseous. If Terrill is unclear then Terrill is suckled. Furry things are vatic. All osseous things are unclear. Robyn is not vatic.", "logic": "\nOsseous(terrill)\nnot Suckled(robyn)\nOsseous(amery)\nUnclear(terrill) -> Suckled(terrill)\nforall x (Unclear(x) -> Vatic(x))\nforall x (Osseous(x) -> Unclear(x))\n\nnot Vatic(robyn)\n\nforall x (Unclear(x) -> Vatic(x)) <- forall x (Osseous(x) -> Unclear(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Debora is diagnostic. Eda is not unhelpful. Alvina is diagnostic. If Debora is apractic then Debora is unhelpful. Furry things are mandibular. All diagnostic things are apractic. Eda is apractic.", "logic": "\nDiagnostic(debora)\nnot Unhelpful(eda)\nDiagnostic(alvina)\nApractic(debora) -> Unhelpful(debora)\nforall x (Apractic(x) -> Mandibular(x))\nforall x (Diagnostic(x) -> Apractic(x))\n\nApractic(eda)\n\nforall x (Diagnostic(x) -> Apractic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Dory is lacteal. Renie is not cycloid. Giorgi is lacteal. If Dory is nutritive then Dory is cycloid. Furry things are meteoritic. All lacteal things are nutritive. Renie is not young.", "logic": "\nLacteal(dory)\nnot Cycloid(renie)\nLacteal(giorgi)\nNutritive(dory) -> Cycloid(dory)\nforall x (Nutritive(x) -> Meteoritic(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) -> Nutritive(x))\n\nnot Young(renie)\n\nnot Young(renie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Tully is wholemeal. Christen is not sepulchral. Randie is wholemeal. If Tully is blubbery then Tully is sepulchral. Furry things are multistory. All wholemeal things are blubbery. Christen is wholemeal.", "logic": "\nWholemeal(tully)\nnot Sepulchral(christen)\nWholemeal(randie)\nBlubbery(tully) -> Sepulchral(tully)\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Wholemeal(x) -> Blubbery(x))\n\nWholemeal(christen)\n\nWholemeal(christen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Clayborne is gleaming. Yalonda is not converted. Saw is gleaming. If Clayborne is powerless then Clayborne is converted. Furry things are pizzicato. All gleaming things are powerless. Saw is not kind.", "logic": "\nGleaming(clayborne)\nnot Converted(yalonda)\nGleaming(saw)\nPowerless(clayborne) -> Converted(clayborne)\nforall x (Powerless(x) -> Pizzicato(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Powerless(x))\n\nnot Kind(saw)\n\nnot Kind(saw) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Steffen is clanging. Charlene is not ranked. Hillel is clanging. If Steffen is aramaic then Steffen is ranked. Furry things are pricy. All clanging things are aramaic. Steffen is rough.", "logic": "\nClanging(steffen)\nnot Ranked(charlene)\nClanging(hillel)\nAramaic(steffen) -> Ranked(steffen)\nforall x (Aramaic(x) -> Pricy(x))\nforall x (Clanging(x) -> Aramaic(x))\n\nRough(steffen)\n\nRough(steffen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1249"} {"premises": "Grady is unpainful. Grady is heatless. Grady is bilateral. Josi is unpainful. Josi is mastoid. Josi is consuming. Josi is camphoric. Josi is milled. Josi is heatless. Josi is bilateral. All bilateral, heatless people are consuming. Round, consuming people are camphoric. All bilateral people are consuming. All bilateral, unpainful people are consuming. If someone is bilateral and camphoric then they are milled. All consuming people are heatless. All camphoric people are unpainful. If someone is bilateral and camphoric then they are milled. Josi is bilateral.", "logic": "\nUnpainful(grady)\nHeatless(grady)\nBilateral(grady)\nUnpainful(josi)\nMastoid(josi)\nConsuming(josi)\nCamphoric(josi)\nMilled(josi)\nHeatless(josi)\nBilateral(josi)\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Heatless(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Heatless(x) and Consuming(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Camphoric(x) -> Milled(x))\nforall x (Consuming(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Unpainful(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Camphoric(x) -> Milled(x))\n\nBilateral(josi)\n\ntherefore Bilateral(josi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-712"} {"premises": "Nanni is laurelled. Nanni is born. Nanni is cagey. Anastasia is laurelled. Anastasia is licked. Anastasia is pyogenic. Anastasia is starless. Anastasia is centennial. Anastasia is born. Anastasia is cagey. All cagey, born people are pyogenic. Round, pyogenic people are starless. All cagey people are pyogenic. All cagey, laurelled people are pyogenic. If someone is cagey and starless then they are centennial. All pyogenic people are born. All starless people are laurelled. If someone is cagey and starless then they are centennial. Anastasia is not born.", "logic": "\nLaurelled(nanni)\nBorn(nanni)\nCagey(nanni)\nLaurelled(anastasia)\nLicked(anastasia)\nPyogenic(anastasia)\nStarless(anastasia)\nCentennial(anastasia)\nBorn(anastasia)\nCagey(anastasia)\nforall x (Cagey(x) and Born(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Born(x) and Pyogenic(x) -> Starless(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) and Laurelled(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) and Starless(x) -> Centennial(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) -> Born(x))\nforall x (Starless(x) -> Laurelled(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) and Starless(x) -> Centennial(x))\n\nnot Born(anastasia)\n\ntherefore Born(anastasia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-712"} {"premises": "Hayward is crescendo. Hayward is seventy. Hayward is gnostic. Lari is crescendo. Lari is municipal. Lari is daedal. Lari is spangled. Lari is celestial. Lari is seventy. Lari is gnostic. All gnostic, seventy people are daedal. Round, daedal people are spangled. All gnostic people are daedal. All gnostic, crescendo people are daedal. If someone is gnostic and spangled then they are celestial. All daedal people are seventy. All spangled people are crescendo. If someone is gnostic and spangled then they are celestial. Hayward is daedal.", "logic": "\nCrescendo(hayward)\nSeventy(hayward)\nGnostic(hayward)\nCrescendo(lari)\nMunicipal(lari)\nDaedal(lari)\nSpangled(lari)\nCelestial(lari)\nSeventy(lari)\nGnostic(lari)\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Seventy(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Seventy(x) and Daedal(x) -> Spangled(x))\nforall x (Gnostic(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Crescendo(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Spangled(x) -> Celestial(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Seventy(x))\nforall x (Spangled(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Spangled(x) -> Celestial(x))\n\nDaedal(hayward)\n\nGnostic(hayward) and forall x (Gnostic(x) -> Daedal(x)) -> therefore Daedal(hayward)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-712"} {"premises": "Wallis is autarkical. Wallis is flyspeck. Wallis is hominal. Yehudi is autarkical. Yehudi is nigerien. Yehudi is mitral. Yehudi is whispered. Yehudi is modish. Yehudi is flyspeck. Yehudi is hominal. All hominal, flyspeck people are mitral. Round, mitral people are whispered. All hominal people are mitral. All hominal, autarkical people are mitral. If someone is hominal and whispered then they are modish. All mitral people are flyspeck. All whispered people are autarkical. If someone is hominal and whispered then they are modish. Wallis is not mitral.", "logic": "\nAutarkical(wallis)\nFlyspeck(wallis)\nHominal(wallis)\nAutarkical(yehudi)\nNigerien(yehudi)\nMitral(yehudi)\nWhispered(yehudi)\nModish(yehudi)\nFlyspeck(yehudi)\nHominal(yehudi)\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Flyspeck(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) and Mitral(x) -> Whispered(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Autarkical(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Whispered(x) -> Modish(x))\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> Flyspeck(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) -> Autarkical(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Whispered(x) -> Modish(x))\n\nnot Mitral(wallis)\n\nHominal(wallis) and forall x (Hominal(x) -> Mitral(x)) -> therefore Mitral(wallis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-712"} {"premises": "Feodora is tensional. Feodora is decorative. Feodora is marooned. Alfie is tensional. Alfie is changeable. Alfie is mislabeled. Alfie is kaput. Alfie is inimitable. Alfie is decorative. Alfie is marooned. All marooned, decorative people are mislabeled. Round, mislabeled people are kaput. All marooned people are mislabeled. All marooned, tensional people are mislabeled. If someone is marooned and kaput then they are inimitable. All mislabeled people are decorative. All kaput people are tensional. If someone is marooned and kaput then they are inimitable. Feodora is kaput.", "logic": "\nTensional(feodora)\nDecorative(feodora)\nMarooned(feodora)\nTensional(alfie)\nChangeable(alfie)\nMislabeled(alfie)\nKaput(alfie)\nInimitable(alfie)\nDecorative(alfie)\nMarooned(alfie)\nforall x (Marooned(x) and Decorative(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\nforall x (Decorative(x) and Mislabeled(x) -> Kaput(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) and Tensional(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) and Kaput(x) -> Inimitable(x))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Decorative(x))\nforall x (Kaput(x) -> Tensional(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) and Kaput(x) -> Inimitable(x))\n\nKaput(feodora)\n\nMarooned(feodora) and forall x (Marooned(x) -> Mislabeled(x)) -> therefore Mislabeled(feodora) Decorative(feodora) and Mislabeled(feodora) and forall x (Decorative(x) and Mislabeled(x) -> Kaput(x)) -> therefore Kaput(feodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-712"} {"premises": "Blancha is contented. Blancha is uniparous. Blancha is small. Agnese is contented. Agnese is brunette. Agnese is mutative. Agnese is dissilient. Agnese is venomous. Agnese is uniparous. Agnese is small. All small, uniparous people are mutative. Round, mutative people are dissilient. All small people are mutative. All small, contented people are mutative. If someone is small and dissilient then they are venomous. All mutative people are uniparous. All dissilient people are contented. If someone is small and dissilient then they are venomous. Blancha is not dissilient.", "logic": "\nContented(blancha)\nUniparous(blancha)\nSmall(blancha)\nContented(agnese)\nBrunette(agnese)\nMutative(agnese)\nDissilient(agnese)\nVenomous(agnese)\nUniparous(agnese)\nSmall(agnese)\nforall x (Small(x) and Uniparous(x) -> Mutative(x))\nforall x (Uniparous(x) and Mutative(x) -> Dissilient(x))\nforall x (Small(x) -> Mutative(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Contented(x) -> Mutative(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Dissilient(x) -> Venomous(x))\nforall x (Mutative(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Dissilient(x) -> Contented(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Dissilient(x) -> Venomous(x))\n\nnot Dissilient(blancha)\n\nSmall(blancha) and forall x (Small(x) -> Mutative(x)) -> therefore Mutative(blancha) Uniparous(blancha) and Mutative(blancha) and forall x (Uniparous(x) and Mutative(x) -> Dissilient(x)) -> therefore Dissilient(blancha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-712"} {"premises": "Vladimir is tracheal. Vladimir is unchanging. Vladimir is wondrous. Vladimir is distressed. Vladimir is tympanic. Isobel is wondrous. Isobel is spiraling. Isobel is distressed. Tomasina is tracheal. Tomasina is unchanging. Tomasina is wondrous. Tomasina is pragmatic. Tomasina is spiraling. Tomasina is distressed. Tomasina is tympanic. All unchanging things are pragmatic. If Isobel is distressed then Isobel is tracheal. All pragmatic, wondrous things are tympanic. If Tomasina is tympanic then Tomasina is wondrous. Quiet things are unchanging. Smart things are spiraling. Tomasina is pragmatic.", "logic": "\nTracheal(vladimir)\nUnchanging(vladimir)\nWondrous(vladimir)\nDistressed(vladimir)\nTympanic(vladimir)\nWondrous(isobel)\nSpiraling(isobel)\nDistressed(isobel)\nTracheal(tomasina)\nUnchanging(tomasina)\nWondrous(tomasina)\nPragmatic(tomasina)\nSpiraling(tomasina)\nDistressed(tomasina)\nTympanic(tomasina)\nforall x (Unchanging(x) -> Pragmatic(x))\nDistressed(isobel) -> Tracheal(isobel)\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) and Wondrous(x) -> Tympanic(x))\nTympanic(tomasina) -> Wondrous(tomasina)\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Distressed(x) -> Spiraling(x))\n\nPragmatic(tomasina)\n\ntherefore Pragmatic(tomasina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1452"} {"premises": "Merwin is amiss. Merwin is gratified. Merwin is collinear. Merwin is fulgurous. Merwin is pedigree. Melosa is collinear. Melosa is forward. Melosa is fulgurous. Samson is amiss. Samson is gratified. Samson is collinear. Samson is meshuga. Samson is forward. Samson is fulgurous. Samson is pedigree. All gratified things are meshuga. If Melosa is fulgurous then Melosa is amiss. All meshuga, collinear things are pedigree. If Samson is pedigree then Samson is collinear. Quiet things are gratified. Smart things are forward. Merwin is not fulgurous.", "logic": "\nAmiss(merwin)\nGratified(merwin)\nCollinear(merwin)\nFulgurous(merwin)\nPedigree(merwin)\nCollinear(melosa)\nForward(melosa)\nFulgurous(melosa)\nAmiss(samson)\nGratified(samson)\nCollinear(samson)\nMeshuga(samson)\nForward(samson)\nFulgurous(samson)\nPedigree(samson)\nforall x (Gratified(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nFulgurous(melosa) -> Amiss(melosa)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) and Collinear(x) -> Pedigree(x))\nPedigree(samson) -> Collinear(samson)\nforall x (Collinear(x) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Forward(x))\n\nnot Fulgurous(merwin)\n\ntherefore Fulgurous(merwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1452"} {"premises": "Meggie is discreet. Meggie is hiemal. Meggie is uplifted. Meggie is quasi. Meggie is endoscopic. Robyn is uplifted. Robyn is risible. Robyn is quasi. Marje is discreet. Marje is hiemal. Marje is uplifted. Marje is unbanded. Marje is risible. Marje is quasi. Marje is endoscopic. All hiemal things are unbanded. If Robyn is quasi then Robyn is discreet. All unbanded, uplifted things are endoscopic. If Marje is endoscopic then Marje is uplifted. Quiet things are hiemal. Smart things are risible. Meggie is unbanded.", "logic": "\nDiscreet(meggie)\nHiemal(meggie)\nUplifted(meggie)\nQuasi(meggie)\nEndoscopic(meggie)\nUplifted(robyn)\nRisible(robyn)\nQuasi(robyn)\nDiscreet(marje)\nHiemal(marje)\nUplifted(marje)\nUnbanded(marje)\nRisible(marje)\nQuasi(marje)\nEndoscopic(marje)\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Unbanded(x))\nQuasi(robyn) -> Discreet(robyn)\nforall x (Unbanded(x) and Uplifted(x) -> Endoscopic(x))\nEndoscopic(marje) -> Uplifted(marje)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Quasi(x) -> Risible(x))\n\nUnbanded(meggie)\n\nHiemal(meggie) and forall x (Hiemal(x) -> Unbanded(x)) -> therefore Unbanded(meggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1452"} {"premises": "Carree is sepulchral. Carree is raffish. Carree is tucked. Carree is sumptuary. Carree is respondent. Wye is tucked. Wye is andante. Wye is sumptuary. Loree is sepulchral. Loree is raffish. Loree is tucked. Loree is studded. Loree is andante. Loree is sumptuary. Loree is respondent. All raffish things are studded. If Wye is sumptuary then Wye is sepulchral. All studded, tucked things are respondent. If Loree is respondent then Loree is tucked. Quiet things are raffish. Smart things are andante. Wye is not sepulchral.", "logic": "\nSepulchral(carree)\nRaffish(carree)\nTucked(carree)\nSumptuary(carree)\nRespondent(carree)\nTucked(wye)\nAndante(wye)\nSumptuary(wye)\nSepulchral(loree)\nRaffish(loree)\nTucked(loree)\nStudded(loree)\nAndante(loree)\nSumptuary(loree)\nRespondent(loree)\nforall x (Raffish(x) -> Studded(x))\nSumptuary(wye) -> Sepulchral(wye)\nforall x (Studded(x) and Tucked(x) -> Respondent(x))\nRespondent(loree) -> Tucked(loree)\nforall x (Tucked(x) -> Raffish(x))\nforall x (Sumptuary(x) -> Andante(x))\n\nnot Sepulchral(wye)\n\nSumptuary(wye) and Sumptuary(wye) -> Sepulchral(wye) -> therefore Sepulchral(wye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1452"} {"premises": "Luanna is urceolate. Luanna is blame. Luanna is squamulose. Luanna is whimsical. Luanna is forfeited. Clifton is squamulose. Clifton is nonionic. Clifton is whimsical. Jaleh is urceolate. Jaleh is blame. Jaleh is squamulose. Jaleh is salivary. Jaleh is nonionic. Jaleh is whimsical. Jaleh is forfeited. All blame things are salivary. If Clifton is whimsical then Clifton is urceolate. All salivary, squamulose things are forfeited. If Jaleh is forfeited then Jaleh is squamulose. Quiet things are blame. Smart things are nonionic. Clifton is salivary.", "logic": "\nUrceolate(luanna)\nBlame(luanna)\nSquamulose(luanna)\nWhimsical(luanna)\nForfeited(luanna)\nSquamulose(clifton)\nNonionic(clifton)\nWhimsical(clifton)\nUrceolate(jaleh)\nBlame(jaleh)\nSquamulose(jaleh)\nSalivary(jaleh)\nNonionic(jaleh)\nWhimsical(jaleh)\nForfeited(jaleh)\nforall x (Blame(x) -> Salivary(x))\nWhimsical(clifton) -> Urceolate(clifton)\nforall x (Salivary(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Forfeited(x))\nForfeited(jaleh) -> Squamulose(jaleh)\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> Blame(x))\nforall x (Whimsical(x) -> Nonionic(x))\n\nSalivary(clifton)\n\nSquamulose(clifton) and forall x (Squamulose(x) -> Blame(x)) -> therefore Blame(clifton) Blame(clifton) and forall x (Blame(x) -> Salivary(x)) -> therefore Salivary(clifton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1452"} {"premises": "Willie is capsulated. Willie is vendible. Willie is preferent. Willie is wobbly. Willie is ossified. Zorana is preferent. Zorana is backstairs. Zorana is wobbly. Harwell is capsulated. Harwell is vendible. Harwell is preferent. Harwell is vested. Harwell is backstairs. Harwell is wobbly. Harwell is ossified. All vendible things are vested. If Zorana is wobbly then Zorana is capsulated. All vested, preferent things are ossified. If Harwell is ossified then Harwell is preferent. Quiet things are vendible. Smart things are backstairs. Zorana is not vested.", "logic": "\nCapsulated(willie)\nVendible(willie)\nPreferent(willie)\nWobbly(willie)\nOssified(willie)\nPreferent(zorana)\nBackstairs(zorana)\nWobbly(zorana)\nCapsulated(harwell)\nVendible(harwell)\nPreferent(harwell)\nVested(harwell)\nBackstairs(harwell)\nWobbly(harwell)\nOssified(harwell)\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Vested(x))\nWobbly(zorana) -> Capsulated(zorana)\nforall x (Vested(x) and Preferent(x) -> Ossified(x))\nOssified(harwell) -> Preferent(harwell)\nforall x (Preferent(x) -> Vendible(x))\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Backstairs(x))\n\nnot Vested(zorana)\n\nPreferent(zorana) and forall x (Preferent(x) -> Vendible(x)) -> therefore Vendible(zorana) Vendible(zorana) and forall x (Vendible(x) -> Vested(x)) -> therefore Vested(zorana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1452"} {"premises": "The angelle is knitted. The angelle is impolite. The angelle is blistery. The angelle is voteless. The angelle is lexical. The angelle abrase the emyle. The angelle correct the emyle. The angelle embrace the emyle. The emyle is knitted. The emyle is impolite. The emyle is blistery. The emyle is voteless. The emyle is lexical. The emyle abrase the angelle. The emyle correct the angelle. The emyle embrace the angelle. If something embrace the emyle then the emyle is lexical. If something abrase the angelle and the angelle is voteless then it abrase the emyle. If something is blistery and it abrase the emyle then it correct the emyle. If the emyle correct the angelle then the emyle is knitted. If something abrase the emyle and the emyle abrase the angelle then it correct the angelle. If something correct the angelle and the angelle correct the emyle then the emyle embrace the angelle. The angelle is knitted.", "logic": "\nKnitted(angelle)\nImpolite(angelle)\nBlistery(angelle)\nVoteless(angelle)\nLexical(angelle)\nAbrase(angelle, emyle)\nCorrect(angelle, emyle)\nEmbrace(angelle, emyle)\nKnitted(emyle)\nImpolite(emyle)\nBlistery(emyle)\nVoteless(emyle)\nLexical(emyle)\nAbrase(emyle, angelle)\nCorrect(emyle, angelle)\nEmbrace(emyle, angelle)\nforall x (Embrace(x, emyle) -> Lexical(emyle))\nforall x (Abrase(x, angelle) and Voteless(angelle) -> Abrase(x, emyle))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Abrase(x, emyle) -> Correct(x, emyle))\nCorrect(emyle, angelle) -> Knitted(emyle)\nforall x (Abrase(x, emyle) and Abrase(emyle, angelle) -> Correct(x, angelle))\nforall x (Correct(x, angelle) and Correct(angelle, emyle) -> Embrace(emyle, angelle))\n\nKnitted(angelle)\n\ntherefore Knitted(angelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The silvester is tanned. The silvester is adjusted. The silvester is lightless. The silvester is through. The silvester is calyculate. The silvester assort the katheleen. The silvester droop the katheleen. The silvester fling the katheleen. The katheleen is tanned. The katheleen is adjusted. The katheleen is lightless. The katheleen is through. The katheleen is calyculate. The katheleen assort the silvester. The katheleen droop the silvester. The katheleen fling the silvester. If something fling the katheleen then the katheleen is calyculate. If something assort the silvester and the silvester is through then it assort the katheleen. If something is lightless and it assort the katheleen then it droop the katheleen. If the katheleen droop the silvester then the katheleen is tanned. If something assort the katheleen and the katheleen assort the silvester then it droop the silvester. If something droop the silvester and the silvester droop the katheleen then the katheleen fling the silvester. The silvester is not through.", "logic": "\nTanned(silvester)\nAdjusted(silvester)\nLightless(silvester)\nThrough(silvester)\nCalyculate(silvester)\nAssort(silvester, katheleen)\nDroop(silvester, katheleen)\nFling(silvester, katheleen)\nTanned(katheleen)\nAdjusted(katheleen)\nLightless(katheleen)\nThrough(katheleen)\nCalyculate(katheleen)\nAssort(katheleen, silvester)\nDroop(katheleen, silvester)\nFling(katheleen, silvester)\nforall x (Fling(x, katheleen) -> Calyculate(katheleen))\nforall x (Assort(x, silvester) and Through(silvester) -> Assort(x, katheleen))\nforall x (Lightless(x) and Assort(x, katheleen) -> Droop(x, katheleen))\nDroop(katheleen, silvester) -> Tanned(katheleen)\nforall x (Assort(x, katheleen) and Assort(katheleen, silvester) -> Droop(x, silvester))\nforall x (Droop(x, silvester) and Droop(silvester, katheleen) -> Fling(katheleen, silvester))\n\nnot Through(silvester)\n\ntherefore Through(silvester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The vicki is decussate. The vicki is offended. The vicki is maximizing. The vicki is ablated. The vicki is snowy. The vicki slobber the dawson. The vicki lapse the dawson. The vicki miniate the dawson. The dawson is decussate. The dawson is offended. The dawson is maximizing. The dawson is ablated. The dawson is snowy. The dawson slobber the vicki. The dawson lapse the vicki. The dawson miniate the vicki. If something miniate the dawson then the dawson is snowy. If something slobber the vicki and the vicki is ablated then it slobber the dawson. If something is maximizing and it slobber the dawson then it lapse the dawson. If the dawson lapse the vicki then the dawson is decussate. If something slobber the dawson and the dawson slobber the vicki then it lapse the vicki. If something lapse the vicki and the vicki lapse the dawson then the dawson miniate the vicki. The vicki lapse the vicki.", "logic": "\nDecussate(vicki)\nOffended(vicki)\nMaximizing(vicki)\nAblated(vicki)\nSnowy(vicki)\nSlobber(vicki, dawson)\nLapse(vicki, dawson)\nMiniate(vicki, dawson)\nDecussate(dawson)\nOffended(dawson)\nMaximizing(dawson)\nAblated(dawson)\nSnowy(dawson)\nSlobber(dawson, vicki)\nLapse(dawson, vicki)\nMiniate(dawson, vicki)\nforall x (Miniate(x, dawson) -> Snowy(dawson))\nforall x (Slobber(x, vicki) and Ablated(vicki) -> Slobber(x, dawson))\nforall x (Maximizing(x) and Slobber(x, dawson) -> Lapse(x, dawson))\nLapse(dawson, vicki) -> Decussate(dawson)\nforall x (Slobber(x, dawson) and Slobber(dawson, vicki) -> Lapse(x, vicki))\nforall x (Lapse(x, vicki) and Lapse(vicki, dawson) -> Miniate(dawson, vicki))\n\nLapse(vicki, vicki)\n\nSlobber(vicki, dawson) and Slobber(dawson, vicki) and forall x (Slobber(x, dawson) and Slobber(dawson, vicki) -> Lapse(x, vicki)) -> therefore Lapse(vicki, vicki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The osmund is rotund. The osmund is edified. The osmund is catalectic. The osmund is uveous. The osmund is undrawn. The osmund skreak the frederik. The osmund ride the frederik. The osmund unteach the frederik. The frederik is rotund. The frederik is edified. The frederik is catalectic. The frederik is uveous. The frederik is undrawn. The frederik skreak the osmund. The frederik ride the osmund. The frederik unteach the osmund. If something unteach the frederik then the frederik is undrawn. If something skreak the osmund and the osmund is uveous then it skreak the frederik. If something is catalectic and it skreak the frederik then it ride the frederik. If the frederik ride the osmund then the frederik is rotund. If something skreak the frederik and the frederik skreak the osmund then it ride the osmund. If something ride the osmund and the osmund ride the frederik then the frederik unteach the osmund. The frederik does not need the frederik.", "logic": "\nRotund(osmund)\nEdified(osmund)\nCatalectic(osmund)\nUveous(osmund)\nUndrawn(osmund)\nSkreak(osmund, frederik)\nRide(osmund, frederik)\nUnteach(osmund, frederik)\nRotund(frederik)\nEdified(frederik)\nCatalectic(frederik)\nUveous(frederik)\nUndrawn(frederik)\nSkreak(frederik, osmund)\nRide(frederik, osmund)\nUnteach(frederik, osmund)\nforall x (Unteach(x, frederik) -> Undrawn(frederik))\nforall x (Skreak(x, osmund) and Uveous(osmund) -> Skreak(x, frederik))\nforall x (Catalectic(x) and Skreak(x, frederik) -> Ride(x, frederik))\nRide(frederik, osmund) -> Rotund(frederik)\nforall x (Skreak(x, frederik) and Skreak(frederik, osmund) -> Ride(x, osmund))\nforall x (Ride(x, osmund) and Ride(osmund, frederik) -> Unteach(frederik, osmund))\n\nnot Skreak(frederik, frederik)\n\nSkreak(frederik, osmund) and Uveous(osmund) and forall x (Skreak(x, osmund) and Uveous(osmund) -> Skreak(x, frederik)) -> therefore Skreak(frederik, frederik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The abbe is cleft. The abbe is indonesian. The abbe is accurate. The abbe is jingling. The abbe is malcontent. The abbe circumvent the parnell. The abbe deride the parnell. The abbe engorge the parnell. The parnell is cleft. The parnell is indonesian. The parnell is accurate. The parnell is jingling. The parnell is malcontent. The parnell circumvent the abbe. The parnell deride the abbe. The parnell engorge the abbe. If something engorge the parnell then the parnell is malcontent. If something circumvent the abbe and the abbe is jingling then it circumvent the parnell. If something is accurate and it circumvent the parnell then it deride the parnell. If the parnell deride the abbe then the parnell is cleft. If something circumvent the parnell and the parnell circumvent the abbe then it deride the abbe. If something deride the abbe and the abbe deride the parnell then the parnell engorge the abbe. The parnell deride the parnell.", "logic": "\nCleft(abbe)\nIndonesian(abbe)\nAccurate(abbe)\nJingling(abbe)\nMalcontent(abbe)\nCircumvent(abbe, parnell)\nDeride(abbe, parnell)\nEngorge(abbe, parnell)\nCleft(parnell)\nIndonesian(parnell)\nAccurate(parnell)\nJingling(parnell)\nMalcontent(parnell)\nCircumvent(parnell, abbe)\nDeride(parnell, abbe)\nEngorge(parnell, abbe)\nforall x (Engorge(x, parnell) -> Malcontent(parnell))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, abbe) and Jingling(abbe) -> Circumvent(x, parnell))\nforall x (Accurate(x) and Circumvent(x, parnell) -> Deride(x, parnell))\nDeride(parnell, abbe) -> Cleft(parnell)\nforall x (Circumvent(x, parnell) and Circumvent(parnell, abbe) -> Deride(x, abbe))\nforall x (Deride(x, abbe) and Deride(abbe, parnell) -> Engorge(parnell, abbe))\n\nDeride(parnell, parnell)\n\nCircumvent(parnell, abbe) and Jingling(abbe) and forall x (Circumvent(x, abbe) and Jingling(abbe) -> Circumvent(x, parnell)) -> therefore Circumvent(parnell, parnell) Accurate(parnell) and Circumvent(parnell, parnell) and forall x (Accurate(x) and Circumvent(x, parnell) -> Deride(x, parnell)) -> therefore Deride(parnell, parnell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The welch is forceful. The welch is mighty. The welch is eulogistic. The welch is dubious. The welch is limp. The welch politick the elwyn. The welch profiteer the elwyn. The welch apparel the elwyn. The elwyn is forceful. The elwyn is mighty. The elwyn is eulogistic. The elwyn is dubious. The elwyn is limp. The elwyn politick the welch. The elwyn profiteer the welch. The elwyn apparel the welch. If something apparel the elwyn then the elwyn is limp. If something politick the welch and the welch is dubious then it politick the elwyn. If something is eulogistic and it politick the elwyn then it profiteer the elwyn. If the elwyn profiteer the welch then the elwyn is forceful. If something politick the elwyn and the elwyn politick the welch then it profiteer the welch. If something profiteer the welch and the welch profiteer the elwyn then the elwyn apparel the welch. The elwyn does not see the elwyn.", "logic": "\nForceful(welch)\nMighty(welch)\nEulogistic(welch)\nDubious(welch)\nLimp(welch)\nPolitick(welch, elwyn)\nProfiteer(welch, elwyn)\nApparel(welch, elwyn)\nForceful(elwyn)\nMighty(elwyn)\nEulogistic(elwyn)\nDubious(elwyn)\nLimp(elwyn)\nPolitick(elwyn, welch)\nProfiteer(elwyn, welch)\nApparel(elwyn, welch)\nforall x (Apparel(x, elwyn) -> Limp(elwyn))\nforall x (Politick(x, welch) and Dubious(welch) -> Politick(x, elwyn))\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) and Politick(x, elwyn) -> Profiteer(x, elwyn))\nProfiteer(elwyn, welch) -> Forceful(elwyn)\nforall x (Politick(x, elwyn) and Politick(elwyn, welch) -> Profiteer(x, welch))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, welch) and Profiteer(welch, elwyn) -> Apparel(elwyn, welch))\n\nnot Profiteer(elwyn, elwyn)\n\nPolitick(elwyn, welch) and Dubious(welch) and forall x (Politick(x, welch) and Dubious(welch) -> Politick(x, elwyn)) -> therefore Politick(elwyn, elwyn) Eulogistic(elwyn) and Politick(elwyn, elwyn) and forall x (Eulogistic(x) and Politick(x, elwyn) -> Profiteer(x, elwyn)) -> therefore Profiteer(elwyn, elwyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The armando is arboreal. The armando is feasible. The armando is unattached. The armando is unwilled. The armando is ruby. The armando stucco the tabbi. The armando thumbtack the tabbi. The armando brood the tabbi. The tabbi is arboreal. The tabbi is feasible. The tabbi is unattached. The tabbi is unwilled. The tabbi is ruby. The tabbi stucco the armando. The tabbi thumbtack the armando. The tabbi brood the armando. If something brood the tabbi then the tabbi is ruby. If something stucco the armando and the armando is unwilled then it stucco the tabbi. If something is unattached and it stucco the tabbi then it thumbtack the tabbi. If the tabbi thumbtack the armando then the tabbi is arboreal. If something stucco the tabbi and the tabbi stucco the armando then it thumbtack the armando. If something thumbtack the armando and the armando thumbtack the tabbi then the tabbi brood the armando. The armando does not need the armando.", "logic": "\nArboreal(armando)\nFeasible(armando)\nUnattached(armando)\nUnwilled(armando)\nRuby(armando)\nStucco(armando, tabbi)\nThumbtack(armando, tabbi)\nBrood(armando, tabbi)\nArboreal(tabbi)\nFeasible(tabbi)\nUnattached(tabbi)\nUnwilled(tabbi)\nRuby(tabbi)\nStucco(tabbi, armando)\nThumbtack(tabbi, armando)\nBrood(tabbi, armando)\nforall x (Brood(x, tabbi) -> Ruby(tabbi))\nforall x (Stucco(x, armando) and Unwilled(armando) -> Stucco(x, tabbi))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and Stucco(x, tabbi) -> Thumbtack(x, tabbi))\nThumbtack(tabbi, armando) -> Arboreal(tabbi)\nforall x (Stucco(x, tabbi) and Stucco(tabbi, armando) -> Thumbtack(x, armando))\nforall x (Thumbtack(x, armando) and Thumbtack(armando, tabbi) -> Brood(tabbi, armando))\n\nnot Stucco(armando, armando)\n\nnot Stucco(armando, armando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "The davine is marly. The davine is orderly. The davine is raring. The davine is abducent. The davine is anglican. The davine shortlist the tabina. The davine determine the tabina. The davine squat the tabina. The tabina is marly. The tabina is orderly. The tabina is raring. The tabina is abducent. The tabina is anglican. The tabina shortlist the davine. The tabina determine the davine. The tabina squat the davine. If something squat the tabina then the tabina is anglican. If something shortlist the davine and the davine is abducent then it shortlist the tabina. If something is raring and it shortlist the tabina then it determine the tabina. If the tabina determine the davine then the tabina is marly. If something shortlist the tabina and the tabina shortlist the davine then it determine the davine. If something determine the davine and the davine determine the tabina then the tabina squat the davine. The tabina squat the tabina.", "logic": "\nMarly(davine)\nOrderly(davine)\nRaring(davine)\nAbducent(davine)\nAnglican(davine)\nShortlist(davine, tabina)\nDetermine(davine, tabina)\nSquat(davine, tabina)\nMarly(tabina)\nOrderly(tabina)\nRaring(tabina)\nAbducent(tabina)\nAnglican(tabina)\nShortlist(tabina, davine)\nDetermine(tabina, davine)\nSquat(tabina, davine)\nforall x (Squat(x, tabina) -> Anglican(tabina))\nforall x (Shortlist(x, davine) and Abducent(davine) -> Shortlist(x, tabina))\nforall x (Raring(x) and Shortlist(x, tabina) -> Determine(x, tabina))\nDetermine(tabina, davine) -> Marly(tabina)\nforall x (Shortlist(x, tabina) and Shortlist(tabina, davine) -> Determine(x, davine))\nforall x (Determine(x, davine) and Determine(davine, tabina) -> Squat(tabina, davine))\n\nSquat(tabina, tabina)\n\nSquat(tabina, tabina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1769"} {"premises": "Patrick is gluteal. Patrick is deciphered. Patrick is bettering. Patrick is correlated. Patrick is amerciable. Patrick is wordy. Nerte is throated. Trudie is gluteal. Trudie is bettering. Trudie is correlated. Trudie is throated. Trudie is amerciable. Trudie is wordy. Ardine is gluteal. Ardine is bettering. Ardine is amerciable. All bettering people are deciphered. If someone is bettering and throated then they are wordy. White, amerciable people are bettering. If someone is throated and wordy then they are amerciable. Cold people are bettering. If Ardine is gluteal and Ardine is amerciable then Ardine is deciphered. If Nerte is deciphered and Nerte is amerciable then Nerte is wordy. If someone is amerciable then they are throated. Trudie is amerciable.", "logic": "\nGluteal(patrick)\nDeciphered(patrick)\nBettering(patrick)\nCorrelated(patrick)\nAmerciable(patrick)\nWordy(patrick)\nThroated(nerte)\nGluteal(trudie)\nBettering(trudie)\nCorrelated(trudie)\nThroated(trudie)\nAmerciable(trudie)\nWordy(trudie)\nGluteal(ardine)\nBettering(ardine)\nAmerciable(ardine)\nforall x (Bettering(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Bettering(x) and Throated(x) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) and Amerciable(x) -> Bettering(x))\nforall x (Throated(x) and Wordy(x) -> Amerciable(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) -> Bettering(x))\nGluteal(ardine) and Amerciable(ardine) -> Deciphered(ardine)\nDeciphered(nerte) and Amerciable(nerte) -> Wordy(nerte)\nforall x (Amerciable(x) -> Throated(x))\n\nAmerciable(trudie)\n\ntherefore Amerciable(trudie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Rosette is nonthermal. Rosette is calceiform. Rosette is shapely. Rosette is unlicensed. Rosette is solved. Rosette is harmonized. Zelig is blear. Sarah is nonthermal. Sarah is shapely. Sarah is unlicensed. Sarah is blear. Sarah is solved. Sarah is harmonized. Rosalynd is nonthermal. Rosalynd is shapely. Rosalynd is solved. All shapely people are calceiform. If someone is shapely and blear then they are harmonized. White, solved people are shapely. If someone is blear and harmonized then they are solved. Cold people are shapely. If Rosalynd is nonthermal and Rosalynd is solved then Rosalynd is calceiform. If Zelig is calceiform and Zelig is solved then Zelig is harmonized. If someone is solved then they are blear. Rosalynd is not shapely.", "logic": "\nNonthermal(rosette)\nCalceiform(rosette)\nShapely(rosette)\nUnlicensed(rosette)\nSolved(rosette)\nHarmonized(rosette)\nBlear(zelig)\nNonthermal(sarah)\nShapely(sarah)\nUnlicensed(sarah)\nBlear(sarah)\nSolved(sarah)\nHarmonized(sarah)\nNonthermal(rosalynd)\nShapely(rosalynd)\nSolved(rosalynd)\nforall x (Shapely(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Shapely(x) and Blear(x) -> Harmonized(x))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and Solved(x) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Blear(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> Shapely(x))\nNonthermal(rosalynd) and Solved(rosalynd) -> Calceiform(rosalynd)\nCalceiform(zelig) and Solved(zelig) -> Harmonized(zelig)\nforall x (Solved(x) -> Blear(x))\n\nnot Shapely(rosalynd)\n\ntherefore Shapely(rosalynd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Tommy is adventive. Tommy is spicy. Tommy is charcoal. Tommy is rearing. Tommy is isothermic. Tommy is dualistic. Emery is discrete. Kathye is adventive. Kathye is charcoal. Kathye is rearing. Kathye is discrete. Kathye is isothermic. Kathye is dualistic. Carlie is adventive. Carlie is charcoal. Carlie is isothermic. All charcoal people are spicy. If someone is charcoal and discrete then they are dualistic. White, isothermic people are charcoal. If someone is discrete and dualistic then they are isothermic. Cold people are charcoal. If Carlie is adventive and Carlie is isothermic then Carlie is spicy. If Emery is spicy and Emery is isothermic then Emery is dualistic. If someone is isothermic then they are discrete. Kathye is spicy.", "logic": "\nAdventive(tommy)\nSpicy(tommy)\nCharcoal(tommy)\nRearing(tommy)\nIsothermic(tommy)\nDualistic(tommy)\nDiscrete(emery)\nAdventive(kathye)\nCharcoal(kathye)\nRearing(kathye)\nDiscrete(kathye)\nIsothermic(kathye)\nDualistic(kathye)\nAdventive(carlie)\nCharcoal(carlie)\nIsothermic(carlie)\nforall x (Charcoal(x) -> Spicy(x))\nforall x (Charcoal(x) and Discrete(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) and Isothermic(x) -> Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Discrete(x) and Dualistic(x) -> Isothermic(x))\nforall x (Spicy(x) -> Charcoal(x))\nAdventive(carlie) and Isothermic(carlie) -> Spicy(carlie)\nSpicy(emery) and Isothermic(emery) -> Dualistic(emery)\nforall x (Isothermic(x) -> Discrete(x))\n\nSpicy(kathye)\n\nCharcoal(kathye) and forall x (Charcoal(x) -> Spicy(x)) -> therefore Spicy(kathye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Freddi is wholemeal. Freddi is neuronic. Freddi is extropic. Freddi is undramatic. Freddi is mesodermal. Freddi is uncombable. Robin is main. Brian is wholemeal. Brian is extropic. Brian is undramatic. Brian is main. Brian is mesodermal. Brian is uncombable. Doria is wholemeal. Doria is extropic. Doria is mesodermal. All extropic people are neuronic. If someone is extropic and main then they are uncombable. White, mesodermal people are extropic. If someone is main and uncombable then they are mesodermal. Cold people are extropic. If Doria is wholemeal and Doria is mesodermal then Doria is neuronic. If Robin is neuronic and Robin is mesodermal then Robin is uncombable. If someone is mesodermal then they are main. Doria is not main.", "logic": "\nWholemeal(freddi)\nNeuronic(freddi)\nExtropic(freddi)\nUndramatic(freddi)\nMesodermal(freddi)\nUncombable(freddi)\nMain(robin)\nWholemeal(brian)\nExtropic(brian)\nUndramatic(brian)\nMain(brian)\nMesodermal(brian)\nUncombable(brian)\nWholemeal(doria)\nExtropic(doria)\nMesodermal(doria)\nforall x (Extropic(x) -> Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Extropic(x) and Main(x) -> Uncombable(x))\nforall x (Uncombable(x) and Mesodermal(x) -> Extropic(x))\nforall x (Main(x) and Uncombable(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Extropic(x))\nWholemeal(doria) and Mesodermal(doria) -> Neuronic(doria)\nNeuronic(robin) and Mesodermal(robin) -> Uncombable(robin)\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Main(x))\n\nnot Main(doria)\n\nMesodermal(doria) and forall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Main(x)) -> therefore Main(doria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Elspeth is sightless. Elspeth is sixteen. Elspeth is corrupting. Elspeth is powdery. Elspeth is experient. Elspeth is cyanogenic. Enrico is curtained. Ignatius is sightless. Ignatius is corrupting. Ignatius is powdery. Ignatius is curtained. Ignatius is experient. Ignatius is cyanogenic. Kally is sightless. Kally is corrupting. Kally is experient. All corrupting people are sixteen. If someone is corrupting and curtained then they are cyanogenic. White, experient people are corrupting. If someone is curtained and cyanogenic then they are experient. Cold people are corrupting. If Kally is sightless and Kally is experient then Kally is sixteen. If Enrico is sixteen and Enrico is experient then Enrico is cyanogenic. If someone is experient then they are curtained. Kally is cyanogenic.", "logic": "\nSightless(elspeth)\nSixteen(elspeth)\nCorrupting(elspeth)\nPowdery(elspeth)\nExperient(elspeth)\nCyanogenic(elspeth)\nCurtained(enrico)\nSightless(ignatius)\nCorrupting(ignatius)\nPowdery(ignatius)\nCurtained(ignatius)\nExperient(ignatius)\nCyanogenic(ignatius)\nSightless(kally)\nCorrupting(kally)\nExperient(kally)\nforall x (Corrupting(x) -> Sixteen(x))\nforall x (Corrupting(x) and Curtained(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Experient(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nforall x (Curtained(x) and Cyanogenic(x) -> Experient(x))\nforall x (Sixteen(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nSightless(kally) and Experient(kally) -> Sixteen(kally)\nSixteen(enrico) and Experient(enrico) -> Cyanogenic(enrico)\nforall x (Experient(x) -> Curtained(x))\n\nCyanogenic(kally)\n\nExperient(kally) and forall x (Experient(x) -> Curtained(x)) -> therefore Curtained(kally) Corrupting(kally) and Curtained(kally) and forall x (Corrupting(x) and Curtained(x) -> Cyanogenic(x)) -> therefore Cyanogenic(kally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Reiko is admittable. Reiko is cymose. Reiko is cautionary. Reiko is baffled. Reiko is costly. Reiko is danish. Corine is jiggered. Julieta is admittable. Julieta is cautionary. Julieta is baffled. Julieta is jiggered. Julieta is costly. Julieta is danish. Anders is admittable. Anders is cautionary. Anders is costly. All cautionary people are cymose. If someone is cautionary and jiggered then they are danish. White, costly people are cautionary. If someone is jiggered and danish then they are costly. Cold people are cautionary. If Anders is admittable and Anders is costly then Anders is cymose. If Corine is cymose and Corine is costly then Corine is danish. If someone is costly then they are jiggered. Anders is not danish.", "logic": "\nAdmittable(reiko)\nCymose(reiko)\nCautionary(reiko)\nBaffled(reiko)\nCostly(reiko)\nDanish(reiko)\nJiggered(corine)\nAdmittable(julieta)\nCautionary(julieta)\nBaffled(julieta)\nJiggered(julieta)\nCostly(julieta)\nDanish(julieta)\nAdmittable(anders)\nCautionary(anders)\nCostly(anders)\nforall x (Cautionary(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Cautionary(x) and Jiggered(x) -> Danish(x))\nforall x (Danish(x) and Costly(x) -> Cautionary(x))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) and Danish(x) -> Costly(x))\nforall x (Cymose(x) -> Cautionary(x))\nAdmittable(anders) and Costly(anders) -> Cymose(anders)\nCymose(corine) and Costly(corine) -> Danish(corine)\nforall x (Costly(x) -> Jiggered(x))\n\nnot Danish(anders)\n\nCostly(anders) and forall x (Costly(x) -> Jiggered(x)) -> therefore Jiggered(anders) Cautionary(anders) and Jiggered(anders) and forall x (Cautionary(x) and Jiggered(x) -> Danish(x)) -> therefore Danish(anders)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Trude is grapey. Trude is reeking. Trude is agronomic. Trude is darkened. Trude is repetitive. Trude is idle. Aggie is sartorial. Rosita is grapey. Rosita is agronomic. Rosita is darkened. Rosita is sartorial. Rosita is repetitive. Rosita is idle. Rodi is grapey. Rodi is agronomic. Rodi is repetitive. All agronomic people are reeking. If someone is agronomic and sartorial then they are idle. White, repetitive people are agronomic. If someone is sartorial and idle then they are repetitive. Cold people are agronomic. If Rodi is grapey and Rodi is repetitive then Rodi is reeking. If Aggie is reeking and Aggie is repetitive then Aggie is idle. If someone is repetitive then they are sartorial. Aggie is not idle.", "logic": "\nGrapey(trude)\nReeking(trude)\nAgronomic(trude)\nDarkened(trude)\nRepetitive(trude)\nIdle(trude)\nSartorial(aggie)\nGrapey(rosita)\nAgronomic(rosita)\nDarkened(rosita)\nSartorial(rosita)\nRepetitive(rosita)\nIdle(rosita)\nGrapey(rodi)\nAgronomic(rodi)\nRepetitive(rodi)\nforall x (Agronomic(x) -> Reeking(x))\nforall x (Agronomic(x) and Sartorial(x) -> Idle(x))\nforall x (Idle(x) and Repetitive(x) -> Agronomic(x))\nforall x (Sartorial(x) and Idle(x) -> Repetitive(x))\nforall x (Reeking(x) -> Agronomic(x))\nGrapey(rodi) and Repetitive(rodi) -> Reeking(rodi)\nReeking(aggie) and Repetitive(aggie) -> Idle(aggie)\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> Sartorial(x))\n\nnot Idle(aggie)\n\nforall x (Agronomic(x) and Sartorial(x) -> Idle(x)) <- forall x (Reeking(x) -> Agronomic(x)) <- forall x (Agronomic(x) -> Reeking(x)) <- forall x (Idle(x) and Repetitive(x) -> Agronomic(x)) <- Reeking(aggie) and Repetitive(aggie) -> Idle(aggie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Gretchen is gibbose. Gretchen is brindle. Gretchen is crazed. Gretchen is dominated. Gretchen is rickety. Gretchen is bungaloid. Hallam is dogged. Ahmad is gibbose. Ahmad is crazed. Ahmad is dominated. Ahmad is dogged. Ahmad is rickety. Ahmad is bungaloid. Wilton is gibbose. Wilton is crazed. Wilton is rickety. All crazed people are brindle. If someone is crazed and dogged then they are bungaloid. White, rickety people are crazed. If someone is dogged and bungaloid then they are rickety. Cold people are crazed. If Wilton is gibbose and Wilton is rickety then Wilton is brindle. If Hallam is brindle and Hallam is rickety then Hallam is bungaloid. If someone is rickety then they are dogged. Hallam is brindle.", "logic": "\nGibbose(gretchen)\nBrindle(gretchen)\nCrazed(gretchen)\nDominated(gretchen)\nRickety(gretchen)\nBungaloid(gretchen)\nDogged(hallam)\nGibbose(ahmad)\nCrazed(ahmad)\nDominated(ahmad)\nDogged(ahmad)\nRickety(ahmad)\nBungaloid(ahmad)\nGibbose(wilton)\nCrazed(wilton)\nRickety(wilton)\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) and Dogged(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) and Rickety(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) and Bungaloid(x) -> Rickety(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Crazed(x))\nGibbose(wilton) and Rickety(wilton) -> Brindle(wilton)\nBrindle(hallam) and Rickety(hallam) -> Bungaloid(hallam)\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> Dogged(x))\n\nBrindle(hallam)\n\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Brindle(x)) <- forall x (Bungaloid(x) and Rickety(x) -> Crazed(x)) <- forall x (Crazed(x) and Dogged(x) -> Bungaloid(x)) <- forall x (Brindle(x) -> Crazed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Claudia is glace. Claudia is exposed. Claudia is stinging. Claudia is omissible. Claudia is slubbed. Claudia is underhung. Marieann is defendable. Leelah is glace. Leelah is stinging. Leelah is omissible. Leelah is defendable. Leelah is slubbed. Leelah is underhung. Haydon is glace. Haydon is stinging. Haydon is slubbed. All stinging people are exposed. If someone is stinging and defendable then they are underhung. White, slubbed people are stinging. If someone is defendable and underhung then they are slubbed. Cold people are stinging. If Haydon is glace and Haydon is slubbed then Haydon is exposed. If Marieann is exposed and Marieann is slubbed then Marieann is underhung. If someone is slubbed then they are defendable. Marieann is not slubbed.", "logic": "\nGlace(claudia)\nExposed(claudia)\nStinging(claudia)\nOmissible(claudia)\nSlubbed(claudia)\nUnderhung(claudia)\nDefendable(marieann)\nGlace(leelah)\nStinging(leelah)\nOmissible(leelah)\nDefendable(leelah)\nSlubbed(leelah)\nUnderhung(leelah)\nGlace(haydon)\nStinging(haydon)\nSlubbed(haydon)\nforall x (Stinging(x) -> Exposed(x))\nforall x (Stinging(x) and Defendable(x) -> Underhung(x))\nforall x (Underhung(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Stinging(x))\nforall x (Defendable(x) and Underhung(x) -> Slubbed(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> Stinging(x))\nGlace(haydon) and Slubbed(haydon) -> Exposed(haydon)\nExposed(marieann) and Slubbed(marieann) -> Underhung(marieann)\nforall x (Slubbed(x) -> Defendable(x))\n\nnot Slubbed(marieann)\n\nforall x (Defendable(x) and Underhung(x) -> Slubbed(x)) <- forall x (Stinging(x) and Defendable(x) -> Underhung(x)) <- forall x (Exposed(x) -> Stinging(x)) <- forall x (Stinging(x) -> Exposed(x)) <- forall x (Underhung(x) and Slubbed(x) -> Stinging(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Nikoletta is beige. Nikoletta is overawed. Nikoletta is religious. Nikoletta is alchemic. Nikoletta is afraid. Nikoletta is bookish. Coreen is repressed. Erich is beige. Erich is religious. Erich is alchemic. Erich is repressed. Erich is afraid. Erich is bookish. Liana is beige. Liana is religious. Liana is afraid. All religious people are overawed. If someone is religious and repressed then they are bookish. White, afraid people are religious. If someone is repressed and bookish then they are afraid. Cold people are religious. If Liana is beige and Liana is afraid then Liana is overawed. If Coreen is overawed and Coreen is afraid then Coreen is bookish. If someone is afraid then they are repressed. Coreen is beige.", "logic": "\nBeige(nikoletta)\nOverawed(nikoletta)\nReligious(nikoletta)\nAlchemic(nikoletta)\nAfraid(nikoletta)\nBookish(nikoletta)\nRepressed(coreen)\nBeige(erich)\nReligious(erich)\nAlchemic(erich)\nRepressed(erich)\nAfraid(erich)\nBookish(erich)\nBeige(liana)\nReligious(liana)\nAfraid(liana)\nforall x (Religious(x) -> Overawed(x))\nforall x (Religious(x) and Repressed(x) -> Bookish(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) and Afraid(x) -> Religious(x))\nforall x (Repressed(x) and Bookish(x) -> Afraid(x))\nforall x (Overawed(x) -> Religious(x))\nBeige(liana) and Afraid(liana) -> Overawed(liana)\nOverawed(coreen) and Afraid(coreen) -> Bookish(coreen)\nforall x (Afraid(x) -> Repressed(x))\n\nBeige(coreen)\n\nBeige(coreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Vanni is perinatal. Vanni is traitorous. Vanni is pass. Vanni is triumphant. Vanni is seljuk. Vanni is amoeboid. Dionysus is anuric. Tessy is perinatal. Tessy is pass. Tessy is triumphant. Tessy is anuric. Tessy is seljuk. Tessy is amoeboid. Berta is perinatal. Berta is pass. Berta is seljuk. All pass people are traitorous. If someone is pass and anuric then they are amoeboid. White, seljuk people are pass. If someone is anuric and amoeboid then they are seljuk. Cold people are pass. If Berta is perinatal and Berta is seljuk then Berta is traitorous. If Dionysus is traitorous and Dionysus is seljuk then Dionysus is amoeboid. If someone is seljuk then they are anuric. Berta is not triumphant.", "logic": "\nPerinatal(vanni)\nTraitorous(vanni)\nPass(vanni)\nTriumphant(vanni)\nSeljuk(vanni)\nAmoeboid(vanni)\nAnuric(dionysus)\nPerinatal(tessy)\nPass(tessy)\nTriumphant(tessy)\nAnuric(tessy)\nSeljuk(tessy)\nAmoeboid(tessy)\nPerinatal(berta)\nPass(berta)\nSeljuk(berta)\nforall x (Pass(x) -> Traitorous(x))\nforall x (Pass(x) and Anuric(x) -> Amoeboid(x))\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) and Seljuk(x) -> Pass(x))\nforall x (Anuric(x) and Amoeboid(x) -> Seljuk(x))\nforall x (Traitorous(x) -> Pass(x))\nPerinatal(berta) and Seljuk(berta) -> Traitorous(berta)\nTraitorous(dionysus) and Seljuk(dionysus) -> Amoeboid(dionysus)\nforall x (Seljuk(x) -> Anuric(x))\n\nnot Triumphant(berta)\n\nnot Triumphant(berta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "Tova is modernised. Tova is eery. Tova is australian. Tova is ukrainian. Tova is busybodied. Tova is situated. Eunice is agonised. Richie is modernised. Richie is australian. Richie is ukrainian. Richie is agonised. Richie is busybodied. Richie is situated. Madelon is modernised. Madelon is australian. Madelon is busybodied. All australian people are eery. If someone is australian and agonised then they are situated. White, busybodied people are australian. If someone is agonised and situated then they are busybodied. Cold people are australian. If Madelon is modernised and Madelon is busybodied then Madelon is eery. If Eunice is eery and Eunice is busybodied then Eunice is situated. If someone is busybodied then they are agonised. Eunice is ukrainian.", "logic": "\nModernised(tova)\nEery(tova)\nAustralian(tova)\nUkrainian(tova)\nBusybodied(tova)\nSituated(tova)\nAgonised(eunice)\nModernised(richie)\nAustralian(richie)\nUkrainian(richie)\nAgonised(richie)\nBusybodied(richie)\nSituated(richie)\nModernised(madelon)\nAustralian(madelon)\nBusybodied(madelon)\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Australian(x) and Agonised(x) -> Situated(x))\nforall x (Situated(x) and Busybodied(x) -> Australian(x))\nforall x (Agonised(x) and Situated(x) -> Busybodied(x))\nforall x (Eery(x) -> Australian(x))\nModernised(madelon) and Busybodied(madelon) -> Eery(madelon)\nEery(eunice) and Busybodied(eunice) -> Situated(eunice)\nforall x (Busybodied(x) -> Agonised(x))\n\nUkrainian(eunice)\n\nUkrainian(eunice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-470"} {"premises": "The judi ameliorate the giorgia. The judi is expurgated. The judi is not educative. The judi is not breakable. The judi is timorous. The judi manoeuver the giorgia. The judi sprinkle the giorgia. The giorgia does not chase the judi. The giorgia is expurgated. The giorgia is educative. The giorgia is not breakable. The giorgia manoeuver the judi. If someone sprinkle the giorgia then they see the judi. If someone sprinkle the judi then they need the judi. If the giorgia is equivocal and the giorgia does not see the judi then the giorgia is not breakable. If someone manoeuver the judi and they do not see the judi then they are equivocal. If someone sprinkle the giorgia and they are equivocal then the giorgia does not chase the judi. If the judi is breakable and the judi does not chase the giorgia then the giorgia ameliorate the judi. If the giorgia is not expurgated and the giorgia does not need the judi then the judi manoeuver the giorgia. If someone is expurgated and they chase the judi then they are timorous. The judi is expurgated.", "logic": "\nAmeliorate(judi, giorgia)\nExpurgated(judi)\nnot Educative(judi)\nnot Breakable(judi)\nTimorous(judi)\nManoeuver(judi, giorgia)\nSprinkle(judi, giorgia)\nnot Ameliorate(giorgia, judi)\nExpurgated(giorgia)\nEducative(giorgia)\nnot Breakable(giorgia)\nManoeuver(giorgia, judi)\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, giorgia) -> Sprinkle(x, judi))\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, judi) -> Manoeuver(x, judi))\nEquivocal(giorgia) and not Sprinkle(giorgia, judi) -> not Breakable(giorgia)\nforall x (Manoeuver(x, judi) and not Sprinkle(x, judi) -> Equivocal(x))\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, giorgia) and Equivocal(x) -> not Ameliorate(giorgia, judi))\nBreakable(judi) and not Ameliorate(judi, giorgia) -> Ameliorate(giorgia, judi)\nnot Expurgated(giorgia) and not Manoeuver(giorgia, judi) -> Manoeuver(judi, giorgia)\nforall x (Expurgated(x) and Ameliorate(x, judi) -> Timorous(x))\n\nExpurgated(judi)\n\ntherefore Expurgated(judi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The leese appeal the aldric. The leese is iatrogenic. The leese is not negro. The leese is not sclerotic. The leese is aghast. The leese sandbag the aldric. The leese quack the aldric. The aldric does not chase the leese. The aldric is iatrogenic. The aldric is negro. The aldric is not sclerotic. The aldric sandbag the leese. If someone quack the aldric then they see the leese. If someone quack the leese then they need the leese. If the aldric is deflective and the aldric does not see the leese then the aldric is not sclerotic. If someone sandbag the leese and they do not see the leese then they are deflective. If someone quack the aldric and they are deflective then the aldric does not chase the leese. If the leese is sclerotic and the leese does not chase the aldric then the aldric appeal the leese. If the aldric is not iatrogenic and the aldric does not need the leese then the leese sandbag the aldric. If someone is iatrogenic and they chase the leese then they are aghast. The aldric is not negro.", "logic": "\nAppeal(leese, aldric)\nIatrogenic(leese)\nnot Negro(leese)\nnot Sclerotic(leese)\nAghast(leese)\nSandbag(leese, aldric)\nQuack(leese, aldric)\nnot Appeal(aldric, leese)\nIatrogenic(aldric)\nNegro(aldric)\nnot Sclerotic(aldric)\nSandbag(aldric, leese)\nforall x (Quack(x, aldric) -> Quack(x, leese))\nforall x (Quack(x, leese) -> Sandbag(x, leese))\nDeflective(aldric) and not Quack(aldric, leese) -> not Sclerotic(aldric)\nforall x (Sandbag(x, leese) and not Quack(x, leese) -> Deflective(x))\nforall x (Quack(x, aldric) and Deflective(x) -> not Appeal(aldric, leese))\nSclerotic(leese) and not Appeal(leese, aldric) -> Appeal(aldric, leese)\nnot Iatrogenic(aldric) and not Sandbag(aldric, leese) -> Sandbag(leese, aldric)\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) and Appeal(x, leese) -> Aghast(x))\n\nnot Negro(aldric)\n\ntherefore Negro(aldric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The judi crescendo the karalee. The judi is untrained. The judi is not stubby. The judi is not related. The judi is scoured. The judi pooch the karalee. The judi turn the karalee. The karalee does not chase the judi. The karalee is untrained. The karalee is stubby. The karalee is not related. The karalee pooch the judi. If someone turn the karalee then they see the judi. If someone turn the judi then they need the judi. If the karalee is vicenary and the karalee does not see the judi then the karalee is not related. If someone pooch the judi and they do not see the judi then they are vicenary. If someone turn the karalee and they are vicenary then the karalee does not chase the judi. If the judi is related and the judi does not chase the karalee then the karalee crescendo the judi. If the karalee is not untrained and the karalee does not need the judi then the judi pooch the karalee. If someone is untrained and they chase the judi then they are scoured. The judi turn the judi.", "logic": "\nCrescendo(judi, karalee)\nUntrained(judi)\nnot Stubby(judi)\nnot Related(judi)\nScoured(judi)\nPooch(judi, karalee)\nTurn(judi, karalee)\nnot Crescendo(karalee, judi)\nUntrained(karalee)\nStubby(karalee)\nnot Related(karalee)\nPooch(karalee, judi)\nforall x (Turn(x, karalee) -> Turn(x, judi))\nforall x (Turn(x, judi) -> Pooch(x, judi))\nVicenary(karalee) and not Turn(karalee, judi) -> not Related(karalee)\nforall x (Pooch(x, judi) and not Turn(x, judi) -> Vicenary(x))\nforall x (Turn(x, karalee) and Vicenary(x) -> not Crescendo(karalee, judi))\nRelated(judi) and not Crescendo(judi, karalee) -> Crescendo(karalee, judi)\nnot Untrained(karalee) and not Pooch(karalee, judi) -> Pooch(judi, karalee)\nforall x (Untrained(x) and Crescendo(x, judi) -> Scoured(x))\n\nTurn(judi, judi)\n\nTurn(judi, karalee) and forall x (Turn(x, karalee) -> Turn(x, judi)) -> therefore Turn(judi, judi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The hamish advertize the luise. The hamish is uncharged. The hamish is not relaxing. The hamish is not zoftig. The hamish is bacillary. The hamish outsmart the luise. The hamish cough the luise. The luise does not chase the hamish. The luise is uncharged. The luise is relaxing. The luise is not zoftig. The luise outsmart the hamish. If someone cough the luise then they see the hamish. If someone cough the hamish then they need the hamish. If the luise is bicornuate and the luise does not see the hamish then the luise is not zoftig. If someone outsmart the hamish and they do not see the hamish then they are bicornuate. If someone cough the luise and they are bicornuate then the luise does not chase the hamish. If the hamish is zoftig and the hamish does not chase the luise then the luise advertize the hamish. If the luise is not uncharged and the luise does not need the hamish then the hamish outsmart the luise. If someone is uncharged and they chase the hamish then they are bacillary. The hamish does not see the hamish.", "logic": "\nAdvertize(hamish, luise)\nUncharged(hamish)\nnot Relaxing(hamish)\nnot Zoftig(hamish)\nBacillary(hamish)\nOutsmart(hamish, luise)\nCough(hamish, luise)\nnot Advertize(luise, hamish)\nUncharged(luise)\nRelaxing(luise)\nnot Zoftig(luise)\nOutsmart(luise, hamish)\nforall x (Cough(x, luise) -> Cough(x, hamish))\nforall x (Cough(x, hamish) -> Outsmart(x, hamish))\nBicornuate(luise) and not Cough(luise, hamish) -> not Zoftig(luise)\nforall x (Outsmart(x, hamish) and not Cough(x, hamish) -> Bicornuate(x))\nforall x (Cough(x, luise) and Bicornuate(x) -> not Advertize(luise, hamish))\nZoftig(hamish) and not Advertize(hamish, luise) -> Advertize(luise, hamish)\nnot Uncharged(luise) and not Outsmart(luise, hamish) -> Outsmart(hamish, luise)\nforall x (Uncharged(x) and Advertize(x, hamish) -> Bacillary(x))\n\nnot Cough(hamish, hamish)\n\nCough(hamish, luise) and forall x (Cough(x, luise) -> Cough(x, hamish)) -> therefore Cough(hamish, hamish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The babs grumble the ashton. The babs is unlimited. The babs is not unsugared. The babs is not benefic. The babs is dermic. The babs distract the ashton. The babs modernise the ashton. The ashton does not chase the babs. The ashton is unlimited. The ashton is unsugared. The ashton is not benefic. The ashton distract the babs. If someone modernise the ashton then they see the babs. If someone modernise the babs then they need the babs. If the ashton is odourless and the ashton does not see the babs then the ashton is not benefic. If someone distract the babs and they do not see the babs then they are odourless. If someone modernise the ashton and they are odourless then the ashton does not chase the babs. If the babs is benefic and the babs does not chase the ashton then the ashton grumble the babs. If the ashton is not unlimited and the ashton does not need the babs then the babs distract the ashton. If someone is unlimited and they chase the babs then they are dermic. The babs distract the babs.", "logic": "\nGrumble(babs, ashton)\nUnlimited(babs)\nnot Unsugared(babs)\nnot Benefic(babs)\nDermic(babs)\nDistract(babs, ashton)\nModernise(babs, ashton)\nnot Grumble(ashton, babs)\nUnlimited(ashton)\nUnsugared(ashton)\nnot Benefic(ashton)\nDistract(ashton, babs)\nforall x (Modernise(x, ashton) -> Modernise(x, babs))\nforall x (Modernise(x, babs) -> Distract(x, babs))\nOdourless(ashton) and not Modernise(ashton, babs) -> not Benefic(ashton)\nforall x (Distract(x, babs) and not Modernise(x, babs) -> Odourless(x))\nforall x (Modernise(x, ashton) and Odourless(x) -> not Grumble(ashton, babs))\nBenefic(babs) and not Grumble(babs, ashton) -> Grumble(ashton, babs)\nnot Unlimited(ashton) and not Distract(ashton, babs) -> Distract(babs, ashton)\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Grumble(x, babs) -> Dermic(x))\n\nDistract(babs, babs)\n\nModernise(babs, ashton) and forall x (Modernise(x, ashton) -> Modernise(x, babs)) -> therefore Modernise(babs, babs) Modernise(babs, babs) and forall x (Modernise(x, babs) -> Distract(x, babs)) -> therefore Distract(babs, babs)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The fancy nickel the amity. The fancy is glace. The fancy is not knackered. The fancy is not floating. The fancy is lordly. The fancy feel the amity. The fancy lend the amity. The amity does not chase the fancy. The amity is glace. The amity is knackered. The amity is not floating. The amity feel the fancy. If someone lend the amity then they see the fancy. If someone lend the fancy then they need the fancy. If the amity is nonsocial and the amity does not see the fancy then the amity is not floating. If someone feel the fancy and they do not see the fancy then they are nonsocial. If someone lend the amity and they are nonsocial then the amity does not chase the fancy. If the fancy is floating and the fancy does not chase the amity then the amity nickel the fancy. If the amity is not glace and the amity does not need the fancy then the fancy feel the amity. If someone is glace and they chase the fancy then they are lordly. The fancy does not need the fancy.", "logic": "\nNickel(fancy, amity)\nGlace(fancy)\nnot Knackered(fancy)\nnot Floating(fancy)\nLordly(fancy)\nFeel(fancy, amity)\nLend(fancy, amity)\nnot Nickel(amity, fancy)\nGlace(amity)\nKnackered(amity)\nnot Floating(amity)\nFeel(amity, fancy)\nforall x (Lend(x, amity) -> Lend(x, fancy))\nforall x (Lend(x, fancy) -> Feel(x, fancy))\nNonsocial(amity) and not Lend(amity, fancy) -> not Floating(amity)\nforall x (Feel(x, fancy) and not Lend(x, fancy) -> Nonsocial(x))\nforall x (Lend(x, amity) and Nonsocial(x) -> not Nickel(amity, fancy))\nFloating(fancy) and not Nickel(fancy, amity) -> Nickel(amity, fancy)\nnot Glace(amity) and not Feel(amity, fancy) -> Feel(fancy, amity)\nforall x (Glace(x) and Nickel(x, fancy) -> Lordly(x))\n\nnot Feel(fancy, fancy)\n\nLend(fancy, amity) and forall x (Lend(x, amity) -> Lend(x, fancy)) -> therefore Lend(fancy, fancy) Lend(fancy, fancy) and forall x (Lend(x, fancy) -> Feel(x, fancy)) -> therefore Feel(fancy, fancy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The toinette joggle the colin. The toinette is senior. The toinette is not flyaway. The toinette is not wesleyan. The toinette is enatic. The toinette frock the colin. The toinette survive the colin. The colin does not chase the toinette. The colin is senior. The colin is flyaway. The colin is not wesleyan. The colin frock the toinette. If someone survive the colin then they see the toinette. If someone survive the toinette then they need the toinette. If the colin is lupine and the colin does not see the toinette then the colin is not wesleyan. If someone frock the toinette and they do not see the toinette then they are lupine. If someone survive the colin and they are lupine then the colin does not chase the toinette. If the toinette is wesleyan and the toinette does not chase the colin then the colin joggle the toinette. If the colin is not senior and the colin does not need the toinette then the toinette frock the colin. If someone is senior and they chase the toinette then they are enatic. The toinette is not lupine.", "logic": "\nJoggle(toinette, colin)\nSenior(toinette)\nnot Flyaway(toinette)\nnot Wesleyan(toinette)\nEnatic(toinette)\nFrock(toinette, colin)\nSurvive(toinette, colin)\nnot Joggle(colin, toinette)\nSenior(colin)\nFlyaway(colin)\nnot Wesleyan(colin)\nFrock(colin, toinette)\nforall x (Survive(x, colin) -> Survive(x, toinette))\nforall x (Survive(x, toinette) -> Frock(x, toinette))\nLupine(colin) and not Survive(colin, toinette) -> not Wesleyan(colin)\nforall x (Frock(x, toinette) and not Survive(x, toinette) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Survive(x, colin) and Lupine(x) -> not Joggle(colin, toinette))\nWesleyan(toinette) and not Joggle(toinette, colin) -> Joggle(colin, toinette)\nnot Senior(colin) and not Frock(colin, toinette) -> Frock(toinette, colin)\nforall x (Senior(x) and Joggle(x, toinette) -> Enatic(x))\n\nnot Lupine(toinette)\n\nforall x (Frock(x, toinette) and not Survive(x, toinette) -> Lupine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The tomasina sidestep the mireielle. The tomasina is skim. The tomasina is not romany. The tomasina is not stunned. The tomasina is bromic. The tomasina pluralize the mireielle. The tomasina lour the mireielle. The mireielle does not chase the tomasina. The mireielle is skim. The mireielle is romany. The mireielle is not stunned. The mireielle pluralize the tomasina. If someone lour the mireielle then they see the tomasina. If someone lour the tomasina then they need the tomasina. If the mireielle is larval and the mireielle does not see the tomasina then the mireielle is not stunned. If someone pluralize the tomasina and they do not see the tomasina then they are larval. If someone lour the mireielle and they are larval then the mireielle does not chase the tomasina. If the tomasina is stunned and the tomasina does not chase the mireielle then the mireielle sidestep the tomasina. If the mireielle is not skim and the mireielle does not need the tomasina then the tomasina pluralize the mireielle. If someone is skim and they chase the tomasina then they are bromic. The mireielle is larval.", "logic": "\nSidestep(tomasina, mireielle)\nSkim(tomasina)\nnot Romany(tomasina)\nnot Stunned(tomasina)\nBromic(tomasina)\nPluralize(tomasina, mireielle)\nLour(tomasina, mireielle)\nnot Sidestep(mireielle, tomasina)\nSkim(mireielle)\nRomany(mireielle)\nnot Stunned(mireielle)\nPluralize(mireielle, tomasina)\nforall x (Lour(x, mireielle) -> Lour(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Lour(x, tomasina) -> Pluralize(x, tomasina))\nLarval(mireielle) and not Lour(mireielle, tomasina) -> not Stunned(mireielle)\nforall x (Pluralize(x, tomasina) and not Lour(x, tomasina) -> Larval(x))\nforall x (Lour(x, mireielle) and Larval(x) -> not Sidestep(mireielle, tomasina))\nStunned(tomasina) and not Sidestep(tomasina, mireielle) -> Sidestep(mireielle, tomasina)\nnot Skim(mireielle) and not Pluralize(mireielle, tomasina) -> Pluralize(tomasina, mireielle)\nforall x (Skim(x) and Sidestep(x, tomasina) -> Bromic(x))\n\nLarval(mireielle)\n\nforall x (Pluralize(x, tomasina) and not Lour(x, tomasina) -> Larval(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The lynn crosscut the ebba. The lynn is cogged. The lynn is not offsides. The lynn is not soapy. The lynn is perturbed. The lynn speckle the ebba. The lynn span the ebba. The ebba does not chase the lynn. The ebba is cogged. The ebba is offsides. The ebba is not soapy. The ebba speckle the lynn. If someone span the ebba then they see the lynn. If someone span the lynn then they need the lynn. If the ebba is clueless and the ebba does not see the lynn then the ebba is not soapy. If someone speckle the lynn and they do not see the lynn then they are clueless. If someone span the ebba and they are clueless then the ebba does not chase the lynn. If the lynn is soapy and the lynn does not chase the ebba then the ebba crosscut the lynn. If the ebba is not cogged and the ebba does not need the lynn then the lynn speckle the ebba. If someone is cogged and they chase the lynn then they are perturbed. The ebba is not perturbed.", "logic": "\nCrosscut(lynn, ebba)\nCogged(lynn)\nnot Offsides(lynn)\nnot Soapy(lynn)\nPerturbed(lynn)\nSpeckle(lynn, ebba)\nSpan(lynn, ebba)\nnot Crosscut(ebba, lynn)\nCogged(ebba)\nOffsides(ebba)\nnot Soapy(ebba)\nSpeckle(ebba, lynn)\nforall x (Span(x, ebba) -> Span(x, lynn))\nforall x (Span(x, lynn) -> Speckle(x, lynn))\nClueless(ebba) and not Span(ebba, lynn) -> not Soapy(ebba)\nforall x (Speckle(x, lynn) and not Span(x, lynn) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Span(x, ebba) and Clueless(x) -> not Crosscut(ebba, lynn))\nSoapy(lynn) and not Crosscut(lynn, ebba) -> Crosscut(ebba, lynn)\nnot Cogged(ebba) and not Speckle(ebba, lynn) -> Speckle(lynn, ebba)\nforall x (Cogged(x) and Crosscut(x, lynn) -> Perturbed(x))\n\nnot Perturbed(ebba)\n\nforall x (Cogged(x) and Crosscut(x, lynn) -> Perturbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The waverley splice the loraine. The waverley is jiggered. The waverley is not starved. The waverley is not inflected. The waverley is cryptic. The waverley congee the loraine. The waverley introvert the loraine. The loraine does not chase the waverley. The loraine is jiggered. The loraine is starved. The loraine is not inflected. The loraine congee the waverley. If someone introvert the loraine then they see the waverley. If someone introvert the waverley then they need the waverley. If the loraine is accusatory and the loraine does not see the waverley then the loraine is not inflected. If someone congee the waverley and they do not see the waverley then they are accusatory. If someone introvert the loraine and they are accusatory then the loraine does not chase the waverley. If the waverley is inflected and the waverley does not chase the loraine then the loraine splice the waverley. If the loraine is not jiggered and the loraine does not need the waverley then the waverley congee the loraine. If someone is jiggered and they chase the waverley then they are cryptic. The loraine congee the loraine.", "logic": "\nSplice(waverley, loraine)\nJiggered(waverley)\nnot Starved(waverley)\nnot Inflected(waverley)\nCryptic(waverley)\nCongee(waverley, loraine)\nIntrovert(waverley, loraine)\nnot Splice(loraine, waverley)\nJiggered(loraine)\nStarved(loraine)\nnot Inflected(loraine)\nCongee(loraine, waverley)\nforall x (Introvert(x, loraine) -> Introvert(x, waverley))\nforall x (Introvert(x, waverley) -> Congee(x, waverley))\nAccusatory(loraine) and not Introvert(loraine, waverley) -> not Inflected(loraine)\nforall x (Congee(x, waverley) and not Introvert(x, waverley) -> Accusatory(x))\nforall x (Introvert(x, loraine) and Accusatory(x) -> not Splice(loraine, waverley))\nInflected(waverley) and not Splice(waverley, loraine) -> Splice(loraine, waverley)\nnot Jiggered(loraine) and not Congee(loraine, waverley) -> Congee(waverley, loraine)\nforall x (Jiggered(x) and Splice(x, waverley) -> Cryptic(x))\n\nCongee(loraine, loraine)\n\nCongee(loraine, loraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The odella approve the imojean. The odella is litigious. The odella is not analyzable. The odella is not wifely. The odella is jade. The odella necrose the imojean. The odella bituminize the imojean. The imojean does not chase the odella. The imojean is litigious. The imojean is analyzable. The imojean is not wifely. The imojean necrose the odella. If someone bituminize the imojean then they see the odella. If someone bituminize the odella then they need the odella. If the imojean is deserted and the imojean does not see the odella then the imojean is not wifely. If someone necrose the odella and they do not see the odella then they are deserted. If someone bituminize the imojean and they are deserted then the imojean does not chase the odella. If the odella is wifely and the odella does not chase the imojean then the imojean approve the odella. If the imojean is not litigious and the imojean does not need the odella then the odella necrose the imojean. If someone is litigious and they chase the odella then they are jade. The imojean does not chase the imojean.", "logic": "\nApprove(odella, imojean)\nLitigious(odella)\nnot Analyzable(odella)\nnot Wifely(odella)\nJade(odella)\nNecrose(odella, imojean)\nBituminize(odella, imojean)\nnot Approve(imojean, odella)\nLitigious(imojean)\nAnalyzable(imojean)\nnot Wifely(imojean)\nNecrose(imojean, odella)\nforall x (Bituminize(x, imojean) -> Bituminize(x, odella))\nforall x (Bituminize(x, odella) -> Necrose(x, odella))\nDeserted(imojean) and not Bituminize(imojean, odella) -> not Wifely(imojean)\nforall x (Necrose(x, odella) and not Bituminize(x, odella) -> Deserted(x))\nforall x (Bituminize(x, imojean) and Deserted(x) -> not Approve(imojean, odella))\nWifely(odella) and not Approve(odella, imojean) -> Approve(imojean, odella)\nnot Litigious(imojean) and not Necrose(imojean, odella) -> Necrose(odella, imojean)\nforall x (Litigious(x) and Approve(x, odella) -> Jade(x))\n\nnot Approve(imojean, imojean)\n\nnot Approve(imojean, imojean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "The norina attack the margaux. The norina is spotless. The norina is not sternal. The norina is not thrilled. The norina is graded. The norina breach the margaux. The norina parget the margaux. The margaux does not chase the norina. The margaux is spotless. The margaux is sternal. The margaux is not thrilled. The margaux breach the norina. If someone parget the margaux then they see the norina. If someone parget the norina then they need the norina. If the margaux is token and the margaux does not see the norina then the margaux is not thrilled. If someone breach the norina and they do not see the norina then they are token. If someone parget the margaux and they are token then the margaux does not chase the norina. If the norina is thrilled and the norina does not chase the margaux then the margaux attack the norina. If the margaux is not spotless and the margaux does not need the norina then the norina breach the margaux. If someone is spotless and they chase the norina then they are graded. The margaux parget the margaux.", "logic": "\nAttack(norina, margaux)\nSpotless(norina)\nnot Sternal(norina)\nnot Thrilled(norina)\nGraded(norina)\nBreach(norina, margaux)\nParget(norina, margaux)\nnot Attack(margaux, norina)\nSpotless(margaux)\nSternal(margaux)\nnot Thrilled(margaux)\nBreach(margaux, norina)\nforall x (Parget(x, margaux) -> Parget(x, norina))\nforall x (Parget(x, norina) -> Breach(x, norina))\nToken(margaux) and not Parget(margaux, norina) -> not Thrilled(margaux)\nforall x (Breach(x, norina) and not Parget(x, norina) -> Token(x))\nforall x (Parget(x, margaux) and Token(x) -> not Attack(margaux, norina))\nThrilled(norina) and not Attack(norina, margaux) -> Attack(margaux, norina)\nnot Spotless(margaux) and not Breach(margaux, norina) -> Breach(norina, margaux)\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Attack(x, norina) -> Graded(x))\n\nParget(margaux, margaux)\n\nParget(margaux, margaux) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1429"} {"premises": "Hall is deckled. Hall is fulgurant. Bartolemo is deckled. Bartolemo is not crippling. Bartolemo is fulgurant. Bartolemo is sinhala. Bartolemo is syncopated. Cicily is not deckled. Cicily is nagging. Cicily is syncopated. Cicily is doped. Katharina is nagging. All nagging people are doped. If someone is syncopated then they are nagging. Bartolemo is fulgurant.", "logic": "\nDeckled(hall)\nFulgurant(hall)\nDeckled(bartolemo)\nnot Crippling(bartolemo)\nFulgurant(bartolemo)\nSinhala(bartolemo)\nSyncopated(bartolemo)\nnot Deckled(cicily)\nNagging(cicily)\nSyncopated(cicily)\nDoped(cicily)\nNagging(katharina)\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Nagging(x))\n\nFulgurant(bartolemo)\n\ntherefore Fulgurant(bartolemo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Gertrude is unbleached. Gertrude is burbly. Martelle is unbleached. Martelle is not octagonal. Martelle is burbly. Martelle is heroic. Martelle is funded. Rupert is not unbleached. Rupert is counter. Rupert is funded. Rupert is courageous. Felisha is counter. All counter people are courageous. If someone is funded then they are counter. Martelle is not heroic.", "logic": "\nUnbleached(gertrude)\nBurbly(gertrude)\nUnbleached(martelle)\nnot Octagonal(martelle)\nBurbly(martelle)\nHeroic(martelle)\nFunded(martelle)\nnot Unbleached(rupert)\nCounter(rupert)\nFunded(rupert)\nCourageous(rupert)\nCounter(felisha)\nforall x (Counter(x) -> Courageous(x))\nforall x (Funded(x) -> Counter(x))\n\nnot Heroic(martelle)\n\ntherefore Heroic(martelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Jenine is monoclinic. Jenine is neonatal. Leandra is monoclinic. Leandra is not unstylish. Leandra is neonatal. Leandra is brusque. Leandra is threadlike. Grete is not monoclinic. Grete is coming. Grete is threadlike. Grete is cubelike. Spike is coming. All coming people are cubelike. If someone is threadlike then they are coming. Leandra is coming.", "logic": "\nMonoclinic(jenine)\nNeonatal(jenine)\nMonoclinic(leandra)\nnot Unstylish(leandra)\nNeonatal(leandra)\nBrusque(leandra)\nThreadlike(leandra)\nnot Monoclinic(grete)\nComing(grete)\nThreadlike(grete)\nCubelike(grete)\nComing(spike)\nforall x (Coming(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Threadlike(x) -> Coming(x))\n\nComing(leandra)\n\nThreadlike(leandra) and forall x (Threadlike(x) -> Coming(x)) -> therefore Coming(leandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Alisa is bathetic. Alisa is paltry. Gwynne is bathetic. Gwynne is not sinister. Gwynne is paltry. Gwynne is unleavened. Gwynne is jazzy. Jami is not bathetic. Jami is soulful. Jami is jazzy. Jami is attainable. Charmion is soulful. All soulful people are attainable. If someone is jazzy then they are soulful. Gwynne is not soulful.", "logic": "\nBathetic(alisa)\nPaltry(alisa)\nBathetic(gwynne)\nnot Sinister(gwynne)\nPaltry(gwynne)\nUnleavened(gwynne)\nJazzy(gwynne)\nnot Bathetic(jami)\nSoulful(jami)\nJazzy(jami)\nAttainable(jami)\nSoulful(charmion)\nforall x (Soulful(x) -> Attainable(x))\nforall x (Jazzy(x) -> Soulful(x))\n\nnot Soulful(gwynne)\n\nJazzy(gwynne) and forall x (Jazzy(x) -> Soulful(x)) -> therefore Soulful(gwynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Rich is scrubbed. Rich is opulent. Nonah is scrubbed. Nonah is not actual. Nonah is opulent. Nonah is knowing. Nonah is homing. Kitty is not scrubbed. Kitty is better. Kitty is homing. Kitty is fictive. Dan is better. All better people are fictive. If someone is homing then they are better. Nonah is fictive.", "logic": "\nScrubbed(rich)\nOpulent(rich)\nScrubbed(nonah)\nnot Actual(nonah)\nOpulent(nonah)\nKnowing(nonah)\nHoming(nonah)\nnot Scrubbed(kitty)\nBetter(kitty)\nHoming(kitty)\nFictive(kitty)\nBetter(dan)\nforall x (Better(x) -> Fictive(x))\nforall x (Homing(x) -> Better(x))\n\nFictive(nonah)\n\nHoming(nonah) and forall x (Homing(x) -> Better(x)) -> therefore Better(nonah) Better(nonah) and forall x (Better(x) -> Fictive(x)) -> therefore Fictive(nonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Ellene is taunting. Ellene is rangy. Collin is taunting. Collin is not retrograde. Collin is rangy. Collin is echt. Collin is bookish. Danelle is not taunting. Danelle is adaptative. Danelle is bookish. Danelle is antiseptic. Rafa is adaptative. All adaptative people are antiseptic. If someone is bookish then they are adaptative. Collin is not antiseptic.", "logic": "\nTaunting(ellene)\nRangy(ellene)\nTaunting(collin)\nnot Retrograde(collin)\nRangy(collin)\nEcht(collin)\nBookish(collin)\nnot Taunting(danelle)\nAdaptative(danelle)\nBookish(danelle)\nAntiseptic(danelle)\nAdaptative(rafa)\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Antiseptic(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) -> Adaptative(x))\n\nnot Antiseptic(collin)\n\nBookish(collin) and forall x (Bookish(x) -> Adaptative(x)) -> therefore Adaptative(collin) Adaptative(collin) and forall x (Adaptative(x) -> Antiseptic(x)) -> therefore Antiseptic(collin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Guy is egotistic. Guy is senile. Lurette is egotistic. Lurette is not modeled. Lurette is senile. Lurette is nontaxable. Lurette is misbegot. Herculie is not egotistic. Herculie is sneaky. Herculie is misbegot. Herculie is nethermost. Shelley is sneaky. All sneaky people are nethermost. If someone is misbegot then they are sneaky. Guy is not nethermost.", "logic": "\nEgotistic(guy)\nSenile(guy)\nEgotistic(lurette)\nnot Modeled(lurette)\nSenile(lurette)\nNontaxable(lurette)\nMisbegot(lurette)\nnot Egotistic(herculie)\nSneaky(herculie)\nMisbegot(herculie)\nNethermost(herculie)\nSneaky(shelley)\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Nethermost(x))\nforall x (Misbegot(x) -> Sneaky(x))\n\nnot Nethermost(guy)\n\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Nethermost(x)) <- forall x (Misbegot(x) -> Sneaky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Mallissa is unforced. Mallissa is coetaneous. Ramesh is unforced. Ramesh is not acanthotic. Ramesh is coetaneous. Ramesh is testy. Ramesh is coordinate. Sibylla is not unforced. Sibylla is ringleted. Sibylla is coordinate. Sibylla is crumbly. Teri is ringleted. All ringleted people are crumbly. If someone is coordinate then they are ringleted. Mallissa is ringleted.", "logic": "\nUnforced(mallissa)\nCoetaneous(mallissa)\nUnforced(ramesh)\nnot Acanthotic(ramesh)\nCoetaneous(ramesh)\nTesty(ramesh)\nCoordinate(ramesh)\nnot Unforced(sibylla)\nRingleted(sibylla)\nCoordinate(sibylla)\nCrumbly(sibylla)\nRingleted(teri)\nforall x (Ringleted(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Ringleted(x))\n\nRingleted(mallissa)\n\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Ringleted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Coretta is testicular. Coretta is indexless. Carolan is testicular. Carolan is not sensorial. Carolan is indexless. Carolan is mislaid. Carolan is bone. Duane is not testicular. Duane is wildcat. Duane is bone. Duane is perfidious. Domenico is wildcat. All wildcat people are perfidious. If someone is bone then they are wildcat. Duane is not sensorial.", "logic": "\nTesticular(coretta)\nIndexless(coretta)\nTesticular(carolan)\nnot Sensorial(carolan)\nIndexless(carolan)\nMislaid(carolan)\nBone(carolan)\nnot Testicular(duane)\nWildcat(duane)\nBone(duane)\nPerfidious(duane)\nWildcat(domenico)\nforall x (Wildcat(x) -> Perfidious(x))\nforall x (Bone(x) -> Wildcat(x))\n\nnot Sensorial(duane)\n\nnot Sensorial(duane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Adelina is unfitting. Adelina is stabilised. Norina is unfitting. Norina is not disturbed. Norina is stabilised. Norina is supplicant. Norina is voluted. Phoebe is not unfitting. Phoebe is rosaceous. Phoebe is voluted. Phoebe is chassidic. Odysseus is rosaceous. All rosaceous people are chassidic. If someone is voluted then they are rosaceous. Odysseus is supplicant.", "logic": "\nUnfitting(adelina)\nStabilised(adelina)\nUnfitting(norina)\nnot Disturbed(norina)\nStabilised(norina)\nSupplicant(norina)\nVoluted(norina)\nnot Unfitting(phoebe)\nRosaceous(phoebe)\nVoluted(phoebe)\nChassidic(phoebe)\nRosaceous(odysseus)\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) -> Chassidic(x))\nforall x (Voluted(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\n\nSupplicant(odysseus)\n\nSupplicant(odysseus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Mavis is suspect. Mavis is heedful. Joline is suspect. Joline is not unrigged. Joline is heedful. Joline is unaged. Joline is downmarket. Alecia is not suspect. Alecia is prefatory. Alecia is downmarket. Alecia is heraldic. Kally is prefatory. All prefatory people are heraldic. If someone is downmarket then they are prefatory. Kally is not downmarket.", "logic": "\nSuspect(mavis)\nHeedful(mavis)\nSuspect(joline)\nnot Unrigged(joline)\nHeedful(joline)\nUnaged(joline)\nDownmarket(joline)\nnot Suspect(alecia)\nPrefatory(alecia)\nDownmarket(alecia)\nHeraldic(alecia)\nPrefatory(kally)\nforall x (Prefatory(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> Prefatory(x))\n\nnot Downmarket(kally)\n\nnot Downmarket(kally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "Hilliard is tributary. Hilliard is diatomic. Genni is tributary. Genni is not silvery. Genni is diatomic. Genni is over. Genni is primeval. Enrika is not tributary. Enrika is asphaltic. Enrika is primeval. Enrika is gimpy. Arther is asphaltic. All asphaltic people are gimpy. If someone is primeval then they are asphaltic. Hilliard is silvery.", "logic": "\nTributary(hilliard)\nDiatomic(hilliard)\nTributary(genni)\nnot Silvery(genni)\nDiatomic(genni)\nOver(genni)\nPrimeval(genni)\nnot Tributary(enrika)\nAsphaltic(enrika)\nPrimeval(enrika)\nGimpy(enrika)\nAsphaltic(arther)\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) -> Gimpy(x))\nforall x (Primeval(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\n\nSilvery(hilliard)\n\nSilvery(hilliard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1430"} {"premises": "The sheffy is indigent. The sheffy is tanzanian. The sheffy is inhibited. The sheffy schematize the gussie. The gussie is impure. The gussie stack the geraldine. The gussie schematize the sheffy. The geraldine is indigent. The geraldine is tanzanian. The geraldine is impure. The geraldine ulcerate the sheffy. The geraldine ulcerate the gussie. The geraldine stack the gussie. The geraldine schematize the sheffy. The geraldine schematize the gussie. If something ulcerate the sheffy then it ulcerate the geraldine. If something is smoothed then it schematize the sheffy. If something ulcerate the geraldine and the geraldine schematize the sheffy then the geraldine is smoothed. The gussie is impure.", "logic": "\nIndigent(sheffy)\nTanzanian(sheffy)\nInhibited(sheffy)\nSchematize(sheffy, gussie)\nImpure(gussie)\nStack(gussie, geraldine)\nSchematize(gussie, sheffy)\nIndigent(geraldine)\nTanzanian(geraldine)\nImpure(geraldine)\nUlcerate(geraldine, sheffy)\nUlcerate(geraldine, gussie)\nStack(geraldine, gussie)\nSchematize(geraldine, sheffy)\nSchematize(geraldine, gussie)\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, sheffy) -> Ulcerate(x, geraldine))\nforall x (Smoothed(x) -> Schematize(x, sheffy))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, geraldine) and Schematize(geraldine, sheffy) -> Smoothed(geraldine))\n\nImpure(gussie)\n\ntherefore Impure(gussie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The ann is doubtful. The ann is unburied. The ann is millennial. The ann scour the yacov. The yacov is rabid. The yacov start the bobette. The yacov scour the ann. The bobette is doubtful. The bobette is unburied. The bobette is rabid. The bobette divert the ann. The bobette divert the yacov. The bobette start the yacov. The bobette scour the ann. The bobette scour the yacov. If something divert the ann then it divert the bobette. If something is fidgety then it scour the ann. If something divert the bobette and the bobette scour the ann then the bobette is fidgety. The ann is not millennial.", "logic": "\nDoubtful(ann)\nUnburied(ann)\nMillennial(ann)\nScour(ann, yacov)\nRabid(yacov)\nStart(yacov, bobette)\nScour(yacov, ann)\nDoubtful(bobette)\nUnburied(bobette)\nRabid(bobette)\nDivert(bobette, ann)\nDivert(bobette, yacov)\nStart(bobette, yacov)\nScour(bobette, ann)\nScour(bobette, yacov)\nforall x (Divert(x, ann) -> Divert(x, bobette))\nforall x (Fidgety(x) -> Scour(x, ann))\nforall x (Divert(x, bobette) and Scour(bobette, ann) -> Fidgety(bobette))\n\nnot Millennial(ann)\n\ntherefore Millennial(ann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The kailey is adorable. The kailey is honduran. The kailey is glacial. The kailey glimmer the kerrill. The kerrill is malaysian. The kerrill brawl the gleda. The kerrill glimmer the kailey. The gleda is adorable. The gleda is honduran. The gleda is malaysian. The gleda quickstep the kailey. The gleda quickstep the kerrill. The gleda brawl the kerrill. The gleda glimmer the kailey. The gleda glimmer the kerrill. If something quickstep the kailey then it quickstep the gleda. If something is wildcat then it glimmer the kailey. If something quickstep the gleda and the gleda glimmer the kailey then the gleda is wildcat. The gleda quickstep the gleda.", "logic": "\nAdorable(kailey)\nHonduran(kailey)\nGlacial(kailey)\nGlimmer(kailey, kerrill)\nMalaysian(kerrill)\nBrawl(kerrill, gleda)\nGlimmer(kerrill, kailey)\nAdorable(gleda)\nHonduran(gleda)\nMalaysian(gleda)\nQuickstep(gleda, kailey)\nQuickstep(gleda, kerrill)\nBrawl(gleda, kerrill)\nGlimmer(gleda, kailey)\nGlimmer(gleda, kerrill)\nforall x (Quickstep(x, kailey) -> Quickstep(x, gleda))\nforall x (Wildcat(x) -> Glimmer(x, kailey))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, gleda) and Glimmer(gleda, kailey) -> Wildcat(gleda))\n\nQuickstep(gleda, gleda)\n\nQuickstep(gleda, kailey) and forall x (Quickstep(x, kailey) -> Quickstep(x, gleda)) -> therefore Quickstep(gleda, gleda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The meggan is okay. The meggan is tuneless. The meggan is stomatous. The meggan discuss the dotty. The dotty is belemnitic. The dotty decolonise the jessalyn. The dotty discuss the meggan. The jessalyn is okay. The jessalyn is tuneless. The jessalyn is belemnitic. The jessalyn bulk the meggan. The jessalyn bulk the dotty. The jessalyn decolonise the dotty. The jessalyn discuss the meggan. The jessalyn discuss the dotty. If something bulk the meggan then it bulk the jessalyn. If something is bimestrial then it discuss the meggan. If something bulk the jessalyn and the jessalyn discuss the meggan then the jessalyn is bimestrial. The jessalyn does not need the jessalyn.", "logic": "\nOkay(meggan)\nTuneless(meggan)\nStomatous(meggan)\nDiscuss(meggan, dotty)\nBelemnitic(dotty)\nDecolonise(dotty, jessalyn)\nDiscuss(dotty, meggan)\nOkay(jessalyn)\nTuneless(jessalyn)\nBelemnitic(jessalyn)\nBulk(jessalyn, meggan)\nBulk(jessalyn, dotty)\nDecolonise(jessalyn, dotty)\nDiscuss(jessalyn, meggan)\nDiscuss(jessalyn, dotty)\nforall x (Bulk(x, meggan) -> Bulk(x, jessalyn))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Discuss(x, meggan))\nforall x (Bulk(x, jessalyn) and Discuss(jessalyn, meggan) -> Bimestrial(jessalyn))\n\nnot Bulk(jessalyn, jessalyn)\n\nBulk(jessalyn, meggan) and forall x (Bulk(x, meggan) -> Bulk(x, jessalyn)) -> therefore Bulk(jessalyn, jessalyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The heinrich is popliteal. The heinrich is lustreless. The heinrich is bullnecked. The heinrich orbit the edythe. The edythe is stingless. The edythe combine the quintina. The edythe orbit the heinrich. The quintina is popliteal. The quintina is lustreless. The quintina is stingless. The quintina retell the heinrich. The quintina retell the edythe. The quintina combine the edythe. The quintina orbit the heinrich. The quintina orbit the edythe. If something retell the heinrich then it retell the quintina. If something is contracted then it orbit the heinrich. If something retell the quintina and the quintina orbit the heinrich then the quintina is contracted. The quintina is contracted.", "logic": "\nPopliteal(heinrich)\nLustreless(heinrich)\nBullnecked(heinrich)\nOrbit(heinrich, edythe)\nStingless(edythe)\nCombine(edythe, quintina)\nOrbit(edythe, heinrich)\nPopliteal(quintina)\nLustreless(quintina)\nStingless(quintina)\nRetell(quintina, heinrich)\nRetell(quintina, edythe)\nCombine(quintina, edythe)\nOrbit(quintina, heinrich)\nOrbit(quintina, edythe)\nforall x (Retell(x, heinrich) -> Retell(x, quintina))\nforall x (Contracted(x) -> Orbit(x, heinrich))\nforall x (Retell(x, quintina) and Orbit(quintina, heinrich) -> Contracted(quintina))\n\nContracted(quintina)\n\nRetell(quintina, heinrich) and forall x (Retell(x, heinrich) -> Retell(x, quintina)) -> therefore Retell(quintina, quintina) Retell(quintina, quintina) and Orbit(quintina, heinrich) and forall x (Retell(x, quintina) and Orbit(quintina, heinrich) -> Contracted(quintina)) -> therefore Contracted(quintina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The winifred is designate. The winifred is peristylar. The winifred is mono. The winifred foresee the juana. The juana is untagged. The juana retrench the bjorne. The juana foresee the winifred. The bjorne is designate. The bjorne is peristylar. The bjorne is untagged. The bjorne cark the winifred. The bjorne cark the juana. The bjorne retrench the juana. The bjorne foresee the winifred. The bjorne foresee the juana. If something cark the winifred then it cark the bjorne. If something is emollient then it foresee the winifred. If something cark the bjorne and the bjorne foresee the winifred then the bjorne is emollient. The bjorne is not emollient.", "logic": "\nDesignate(winifred)\nPeristylar(winifred)\nMono(winifred)\nForesee(winifred, juana)\nUntagged(juana)\nRetrench(juana, bjorne)\nForesee(juana, winifred)\nDesignate(bjorne)\nPeristylar(bjorne)\nUntagged(bjorne)\nCark(bjorne, winifred)\nCark(bjorne, juana)\nRetrench(bjorne, juana)\nForesee(bjorne, winifred)\nForesee(bjorne, juana)\nforall x (Cark(x, winifred) -> Cark(x, bjorne))\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> Foresee(x, winifred))\nforall x (Cark(x, bjorne) and Foresee(bjorne, winifred) -> Emollient(bjorne))\n\nnot Emollient(bjorne)\n\nCark(bjorne, winifred) and forall x (Cark(x, winifred) -> Cark(x, bjorne)) -> therefore Cark(bjorne, bjorne) Cark(bjorne, bjorne) and Foresee(bjorne, winifred) and forall x (Cark(x, bjorne) and Foresee(bjorne, winifred) -> Emollient(bjorne)) -> therefore Emollient(bjorne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The hakim is manifold. The hakim is stabbing. The hakim is woven. The hakim syphon the florencia. The florencia is dumbstruck. The florencia revitalise the allie. The florencia syphon the hakim. The allie is manifold. The allie is stabbing. The allie is dumbstruck. The allie abort the hakim. The allie abort the florencia. The allie revitalise the florencia. The allie syphon the hakim. The allie syphon the florencia. If something abort the hakim then it abort the allie. If something is anuretic then it syphon the hakim. If something abort the allie and the allie syphon the hakim then the allie is anuretic. The hakim does not need the allie.", "logic": "\nManifold(hakim)\nStabbing(hakim)\nWoven(hakim)\nSyphon(hakim, florencia)\nDumbstruck(florencia)\nRevitalise(florencia, allie)\nSyphon(florencia, hakim)\nManifold(allie)\nStabbing(allie)\nDumbstruck(allie)\nAbort(allie, hakim)\nAbort(allie, florencia)\nRevitalise(allie, florencia)\nSyphon(allie, hakim)\nSyphon(allie, florencia)\nforall x (Abort(x, hakim) -> Abort(x, allie))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) -> Syphon(x, hakim))\nforall x (Abort(x, allie) and Syphon(allie, hakim) -> Anuretic(allie))\n\nnot Abort(hakim, allie)\n\nforall x (Abort(x, hakim) -> Abort(x, allie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The brady is taxable. The brady is antitumor. The brady is multiform. The brady revitalise the fredra. The fredra is saltlike. The fredra slice the ambrose. The fredra revitalise the brady. The ambrose is taxable. The ambrose is antitumor. The ambrose is saltlike. The ambrose nudge the brady. The ambrose nudge the fredra. The ambrose slice the fredra. The ambrose revitalise the brady. The ambrose revitalise the fredra. If something nudge the brady then it nudge the ambrose. If something is metonymic then it revitalise the brady. If something nudge the ambrose and the ambrose revitalise the brady then the ambrose is metonymic. The fredra nudge the ambrose.", "logic": "\nTaxable(brady)\nAntitumor(brady)\nMultiform(brady)\nRevitalise(brady, fredra)\nSaltlike(fredra)\nSlice(fredra, ambrose)\nRevitalise(fredra, brady)\nTaxable(ambrose)\nAntitumor(ambrose)\nSaltlike(ambrose)\nNudge(ambrose, brady)\nNudge(ambrose, fredra)\nSlice(ambrose, fredra)\nRevitalise(ambrose, brady)\nRevitalise(ambrose, fredra)\nforall x (Nudge(x, brady) -> Nudge(x, ambrose))\nforall x (Metonymic(x) -> Revitalise(x, brady))\nforall x (Nudge(x, ambrose) and Revitalise(ambrose, brady) -> Metonymic(ambrose))\n\nNudge(fredra, ambrose)\n\nforall x (Nudge(x, brady) -> Nudge(x, ambrose)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The matilde is variable. The matilde is acceptive. The matilde is reniform. The matilde ingest the fox. The fox is organized. The fox echo the amandie. The fox ingest the matilde. The amandie is variable. The amandie is acceptive. The amandie is organized. The amandie secularize the matilde. The amandie secularize the fox. The amandie echo the fox. The amandie ingest the matilde. The amandie ingest the fox. If something secularize the matilde then it secularize the amandie. If something is stunted then it ingest the matilde. If something secularize the amandie and the amandie ingest the matilde then the amandie is stunted. The matilde does not visit the matilde.", "logic": "\nVariable(matilde)\nAcceptive(matilde)\nReniform(matilde)\nIngest(matilde, fox)\nOrganized(fox)\nEcho(fox, amandie)\nIngest(fox, matilde)\nVariable(amandie)\nAcceptive(amandie)\nOrganized(amandie)\nSecularize(amandie, matilde)\nSecularize(amandie, fox)\nEcho(amandie, fox)\nIngest(amandie, matilde)\nIngest(amandie, fox)\nforall x (Secularize(x, matilde) -> Secularize(x, amandie))\nforall x (Stunted(x) -> Ingest(x, matilde))\nforall x (Secularize(x, amandie) and Ingest(amandie, matilde) -> Stunted(amandie))\n\nnot Ingest(matilde, matilde)\n\nforall x (Stunted(x) -> Ingest(x, matilde)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The krystalle is washable. The krystalle is plumy. The krystalle is wheaten. The krystalle bedight the cobb. The cobb is climactic. The cobb queen the ervin. The cobb bedight the krystalle. The ervin is washable. The ervin is plumy. The ervin is climactic. The ervin stress the krystalle. The ervin stress the cobb. The ervin queen the cobb. The ervin bedight the krystalle. The ervin bedight the cobb. If something stress the krystalle then it stress the ervin. If something is womanlike then it bedight the krystalle. If something stress the ervin and the ervin bedight the krystalle then the ervin is womanlike. The cobb bedight the cobb.", "logic": "\nWashable(krystalle)\nPlumy(krystalle)\nWheaten(krystalle)\nBedight(krystalle, cobb)\nClimactic(cobb)\nQueen(cobb, ervin)\nBedight(cobb, krystalle)\nWashable(ervin)\nPlumy(ervin)\nClimactic(ervin)\nStress(ervin, krystalle)\nStress(ervin, cobb)\nQueen(ervin, cobb)\nBedight(ervin, krystalle)\nBedight(ervin, cobb)\nforall x (Stress(x, krystalle) -> Stress(x, ervin))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Bedight(x, krystalle))\nforall x (Stress(x, ervin) and Bedight(ervin, krystalle) -> Womanlike(ervin))\n\nBedight(cobb, cobb)\n\nBedight(cobb, cobb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The nena is microbial. The nena is lordless. The nena is futurist. The nena claw the cherlyn. The cherlyn is curdled. The cherlyn drawl the arianne. The cherlyn claw the nena. The arianne is microbial. The arianne is lordless. The arianne is curdled. The arianne restock the nena. The arianne restock the cherlyn. The arianne drawl the cherlyn. The arianne claw the nena. The arianne claw the cherlyn. If something restock the nena then it restock the arianne. If something is postal then it claw the nena. If something restock the arianne and the arianne claw the nena then the arianne is postal. The cherlyn does not need the cherlyn.", "logic": "\nMicrobial(nena)\nLordless(nena)\nFuturist(nena)\nClaw(nena, cherlyn)\nCurdled(cherlyn)\nDrawl(cherlyn, arianne)\nClaw(cherlyn, nena)\nMicrobial(arianne)\nLordless(arianne)\nCurdled(arianne)\nRestock(arianne, nena)\nRestock(arianne, cherlyn)\nDrawl(arianne, cherlyn)\nClaw(arianne, nena)\nClaw(arianne, cherlyn)\nforall x (Restock(x, nena) -> Restock(x, arianne))\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Claw(x, nena))\nforall x (Restock(x, arianne) and Claw(arianne, nena) -> Postal(arianne))\n\nnot Restock(cherlyn, cherlyn)\n\nnot Restock(cherlyn, cherlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "The etty is relieved. The etty is belated. The etty is some. The etty needle the avram. The avram is pianistic. The avram bull the dorothy. The avram needle the etty. The dorothy is relieved. The dorothy is belated. The dorothy is pianistic. The dorothy heterodyne the etty. The dorothy heterodyne the avram. The dorothy bull the avram. The dorothy needle the etty. The dorothy needle the avram. If something heterodyne the etty then it heterodyne the dorothy. If something is perfidious then it needle the etty. If something heterodyne the dorothy and the dorothy needle the etty then the dorothy is perfidious. The etty is pianistic.", "logic": "\nRelieved(etty)\nBelated(etty)\nSome(etty)\nNeedle(etty, avram)\nPianistic(avram)\nBull(avram, dorothy)\nNeedle(avram, etty)\nRelieved(dorothy)\nBelated(dorothy)\nPianistic(dorothy)\nHeterodyne(dorothy, etty)\nHeterodyne(dorothy, avram)\nBull(dorothy, avram)\nNeedle(dorothy, etty)\nNeedle(dorothy, avram)\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, etty) -> Heterodyne(x, dorothy))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) -> Needle(x, etty))\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, dorothy) and Needle(dorothy, etty) -> Perfidious(dorothy))\n\nPianistic(etty)\n\nPianistic(etty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1460"} {"premises": "Montague is assonant. Montague is parked. Montague is gloomy. Fara is parked. Fara is measurable. Karee is operose. Karee is gloomy. Green things are measurable. If Montague is measurable and Montague is polyphase then Montague is operose. If Montague is muslim then Montague is not operose. All operose things are gloomy. If something is gloomy and assonant then it is operose. Big things are polyphase. If Fara is polyphase then Fara is operose. If something is polyphase then it is parked. Fara is parked.", "logic": "\nAssonant(montague)\nParked(montague)\nGloomy(montague)\nParked(fara)\nMeasurable(fara)\nOperose(karee)\nGloomy(karee)\nforall x (Parked(x) -> Measurable(x))\nMeasurable(montague) and Polyphase(montague) -> Operose(montague)\nMuslim(montague) -> not Operose(montague)\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and Assonant(x) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Polyphase(x))\nPolyphase(fara) -> Operose(fara)\nforall x (Polyphase(x) -> Parked(x))\n\nParked(fara)\n\ntherefore Parked(fara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Tate is effluent. Tate is angelical. Tate is plantal. Gerhardt is angelical. Gerhardt is hominal. Braden is embossed. Braden is plantal. Green things are hominal. If Tate is hominal and Tate is delusional then Tate is embossed. If Tate is uneventful then Tate is not embossed. All embossed things are plantal. If something is plantal and effluent then it is embossed. Big things are delusional. If Gerhardt is delusional then Gerhardt is embossed. If something is delusional then it is angelical. Tate is not angelical.", "logic": "\nEffluent(tate)\nAngelical(tate)\nPlantal(tate)\nAngelical(gerhardt)\nHominal(gerhardt)\nEmbossed(braden)\nPlantal(braden)\nforall x (Angelical(x) -> Hominal(x))\nHominal(tate) and Delusional(tate) -> Embossed(tate)\nUneventful(tate) -> not Embossed(tate)\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Plantal(x))\nforall x (Plantal(x) and Effluent(x) -> Embossed(x))\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Delusional(x))\nDelusional(gerhardt) -> Embossed(gerhardt)\nforall x (Delusional(x) -> Angelical(x))\n\nnot Angelical(tate)\n\ntherefore Angelical(tate)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Sigrid is percipient. Sigrid is boric. Sigrid is fahrenheit. Zandra is boric. Zandra is withered. Reinhard is hebraic. Reinhard is fahrenheit. Green things are withered. If Sigrid is withered and Sigrid is demoniacal then Sigrid is hebraic. If Sigrid is magical then Sigrid is not hebraic. All hebraic things are fahrenheit. If something is fahrenheit and percipient then it is hebraic. Big things are demoniacal. If Zandra is demoniacal then Zandra is hebraic. If something is demoniacal then it is boric. Sigrid is withered.", "logic": "\nPercipient(sigrid)\nBoric(sigrid)\nFahrenheit(sigrid)\nBoric(zandra)\nWithered(zandra)\nHebraic(reinhard)\nFahrenheit(reinhard)\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Withered(x))\nWithered(sigrid) and Demoniacal(sigrid) -> Hebraic(sigrid)\nMagical(sigrid) -> not Hebraic(sigrid)\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nforall x (Fahrenheit(x) and Percipient(x) -> Hebraic(x))\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nDemoniacal(zandra) -> Hebraic(zandra)\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) -> Boric(x))\n\nWithered(sigrid)\n\nBoric(sigrid) and forall x (Boric(x) -> Withered(x)) -> therefore Withered(sigrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Theodora is ectodermic. Theodora is unforced. Theodora is polygamous. Flossy is unforced. Flossy is pectoral. Steffen is viii. Steffen is polygamous. Green things are pectoral. If Theodora is pectoral and Theodora is authorized then Theodora is viii. If Theodora is lymphoid then Theodora is not viii. All viii things are polygamous. If something is polygamous and ectodermic then it is viii. Big things are authorized. If Flossy is authorized then Flossy is viii. If something is authorized then it is unforced. Theodora is not viii.", "logic": "\nEctodermic(theodora)\nUnforced(theodora)\nPolygamous(theodora)\nUnforced(flossy)\nPectoral(flossy)\nViii(steffen)\nPolygamous(steffen)\nforall x (Unforced(x) -> Pectoral(x))\nPectoral(theodora) and Authorized(theodora) -> Viii(theodora)\nLymphoid(theodora) -> not Viii(theodora)\nforall x (Viii(x) -> Polygamous(x))\nforall x (Polygamous(x) and Ectodermic(x) -> Viii(x))\nforall x (Viii(x) -> Authorized(x))\nAuthorized(flossy) -> Viii(flossy)\nforall x (Authorized(x) -> Unforced(x))\n\nnot Viii(theodora)\n\nPolygamous(theodora) and Ectodermic(theodora) and forall x (Polygamous(x) and Ectodermic(x) -> Viii(x)) -> therefore Viii(theodora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Desiree is sneaky. Desiree is undulatory. Desiree is unchaste. Eloise is undulatory. Eloise is weeklong. Elinor is backhanded. Elinor is unchaste. Green things are weeklong. If Desiree is weeklong and Desiree is enlarged then Desiree is backhanded. If Desiree is annular then Desiree is not backhanded. All backhanded things are unchaste. If something is unchaste and sneaky then it is backhanded. Big things are enlarged. If Eloise is enlarged then Eloise is backhanded. If something is enlarged then it is undulatory. Elinor is undulatory.", "logic": "\nSneaky(desiree)\nUndulatory(desiree)\nUnchaste(desiree)\nUndulatory(eloise)\nWeeklong(eloise)\nBackhanded(elinor)\nUnchaste(elinor)\nforall x (Undulatory(x) -> Weeklong(x))\nWeeklong(desiree) and Enlarged(desiree) -> Backhanded(desiree)\nAnnular(desiree) -> not Backhanded(desiree)\nforall x (Backhanded(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Sneaky(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Backhanded(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nEnlarged(eloise) -> Backhanded(eloise)\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Undulatory(x))\n\nUndulatory(elinor)\n\nBackhanded(elinor) and forall x (Backhanded(x) -> Enlarged(x)) -> therefore Enlarged(elinor) Enlarged(elinor) and forall x (Enlarged(x) -> Undulatory(x)) -> therefore Undulatory(elinor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Renate is eyeless. Renate is populated. Renate is effortful. Mignon is populated. Mignon is bituminous. Jarvis is patronymic. Jarvis is effortful. Green things are bituminous. If Renate is bituminous and Renate is slangy then Renate is patronymic. If Renate is uncousinly then Renate is not patronymic. All patronymic things are effortful. If something is effortful and eyeless then it is patronymic. Big things are slangy. If Mignon is slangy then Mignon is patronymic. If something is slangy then it is populated. Jarvis is not populated.", "logic": "\nEyeless(renate)\nPopulated(renate)\nEffortful(renate)\nPopulated(mignon)\nBituminous(mignon)\nPatronymic(jarvis)\nEffortful(jarvis)\nforall x (Populated(x) -> Bituminous(x))\nBituminous(renate) and Slangy(renate) -> Patronymic(renate)\nUncousinly(renate) -> not Patronymic(renate)\nforall x (Patronymic(x) -> Effortful(x))\nforall x (Effortful(x) and Eyeless(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Patronymic(x) -> Slangy(x))\nSlangy(mignon) -> Patronymic(mignon)\nforall x (Slangy(x) -> Populated(x))\n\nnot Populated(jarvis)\n\nPatronymic(jarvis) and forall x (Patronymic(x) -> Slangy(x)) -> therefore Slangy(jarvis) Slangy(jarvis) and forall x (Slangy(x) -> Populated(x)) -> therefore Populated(jarvis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Tobin is saharan. Tobin is kenyan. Tobin is caruncular. Merry is kenyan. Merry is confusable. Hanny is burred. Hanny is caruncular. Green things are confusable. If Tobin is confusable and Tobin is opponent then Tobin is burred. If Tobin is consolable then Tobin is not burred. All burred things are caruncular. If something is caruncular and saharan then it is burred. Big things are opponent. If Merry is opponent then Merry is burred. If something is opponent then it is kenyan. Merry is not burred.", "logic": "\nSaharan(tobin)\nKenyan(tobin)\nCaruncular(tobin)\nKenyan(merry)\nConfusable(merry)\nBurred(hanny)\nCaruncular(hanny)\nforall x (Kenyan(x) -> Confusable(x))\nConfusable(tobin) and Opponent(tobin) -> Burred(tobin)\nConsolable(tobin) -> not Burred(tobin)\nforall x (Burred(x) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Caruncular(x) and Saharan(x) -> Burred(x))\nforall x (Burred(x) -> Opponent(x))\nOpponent(merry) -> Burred(merry)\nforall x (Opponent(x) -> Kenyan(x))\n\nnot Burred(merry)\n\nOpponent(merry) -> Burred(merry) <- forall x (Burred(x) -> Opponent(x)) <- forall x (Caruncular(x) and Saharan(x) -> Burred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Martyn is syncarpous. Martyn is branded. Martyn is sleety. Stevena is branded. Stevena is twin. Fanny is sixth. Fanny is sleety. Green things are twin. If Martyn is twin and Martyn is newsy then Martyn is sixth. If Martyn is peritoneal then Martyn is not sixth. All sixth things are sleety. If something is sleety and syncarpous then it is sixth. Big things are newsy. If Stevena is newsy then Stevena is sixth. If something is newsy then it is branded. Stevena is sleety.", "logic": "\nSyncarpous(martyn)\nBranded(martyn)\nSleety(martyn)\nBranded(stevena)\nTwin(stevena)\nSixth(fanny)\nSleety(fanny)\nforall x (Branded(x) -> Twin(x))\nTwin(martyn) and Newsy(martyn) -> Sixth(martyn)\nPeritoneal(martyn) -> not Sixth(martyn)\nforall x (Sixth(x) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Sleety(x) and Syncarpous(x) -> Sixth(x))\nforall x (Sixth(x) -> Newsy(x))\nNewsy(stevena) -> Sixth(stevena)\nforall x (Newsy(x) -> Branded(x))\n\nSleety(stevena)\n\nforall x (Sixth(x) -> Sleety(x)) <- Newsy(stevena) -> Sixth(stevena) <- forall x (Sixth(x) -> Newsy(x)) <- forall x (Sleety(x) and Syncarpous(x) -> Sixth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Josepha is metabolic. Josepha is auxetic. Josepha is tantamount. Doti is auxetic. Doti is cockney. Sawyer is troubled. Sawyer is tantamount. Green things are cockney. If Josepha is cockney and Josepha is freehanded then Josepha is troubled. If Josepha is gaunt then Josepha is not troubled. All troubled things are tantamount. If something is tantamount and metabolic then it is troubled. Big things are freehanded. If Doti is freehanded then Doti is troubled. If something is freehanded then it is auxetic. Doti is not freehanded.", "logic": "\nMetabolic(josepha)\nAuxetic(josepha)\nTantamount(josepha)\nAuxetic(doti)\nCockney(doti)\nTroubled(sawyer)\nTantamount(sawyer)\nforall x (Auxetic(x) -> Cockney(x))\nCockney(josepha) and Freehanded(josepha) -> Troubled(josepha)\nGaunt(josepha) -> not Troubled(josepha)\nforall x (Troubled(x) -> Tantamount(x))\nforall x (Tantamount(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Troubled(x))\nforall x (Troubled(x) -> Freehanded(x))\nFreehanded(doti) -> Troubled(doti)\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Auxetic(x))\n\nnot Freehanded(doti)\n\nforall x (Troubled(x) -> Freehanded(x)) <- forall x (Tantamount(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Troubled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Rupert is absorbable. Rupert is vertebral. Rupert is apathetic. Irvine is vertebral. Irvine is sequential. Datha is errhine. Datha is apathetic. Green things are sequential. If Rupert is sequential and Rupert is burbling then Rupert is errhine. If Rupert is unsold then Rupert is not errhine. All errhine things are apathetic. If something is apathetic and absorbable then it is errhine. Big things are burbling. If Irvine is burbling then Irvine is errhine. If something is burbling then it is vertebral. Datha is absorbable.", "logic": "\nAbsorbable(rupert)\nVertebral(rupert)\nApathetic(rupert)\nVertebral(irvine)\nSequential(irvine)\nErrhine(datha)\nApathetic(datha)\nforall x (Vertebral(x) -> Sequential(x))\nSequential(rupert) and Burbling(rupert) -> Errhine(rupert)\nUnsold(rupert) -> not Errhine(rupert)\nforall x (Errhine(x) -> Apathetic(x))\nforall x (Apathetic(x) and Absorbable(x) -> Errhine(x))\nforall x (Errhine(x) -> Burbling(x))\nBurbling(irvine) -> Errhine(irvine)\nforall x (Burbling(x) -> Vertebral(x))\n\nAbsorbable(datha)\n\nAbsorbable(datha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Teresina is follicular. Teresina is tenured. Teresina is putrid. Alisha is tenured. Alisha is modulated. Jeana is henpecked. Jeana is putrid. Green things are modulated. If Teresina is modulated and Teresina is perverse then Teresina is henpecked. If Teresina is ironshod then Teresina is not henpecked. All henpecked things are putrid. If something is putrid and follicular then it is henpecked. Big things are perverse. If Alisha is perverse then Alisha is henpecked. If something is perverse then it is tenured. Alisha is not ironshod.", "logic": "\nFollicular(teresina)\nTenured(teresina)\nPutrid(teresina)\nTenured(alisha)\nModulated(alisha)\nHenpecked(jeana)\nPutrid(jeana)\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Modulated(x))\nModulated(teresina) and Perverse(teresina) -> Henpecked(teresina)\nIronshod(teresina) -> not Henpecked(teresina)\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Putrid(x) and Follicular(x) -> Henpecked(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Perverse(x))\nPerverse(alisha) -> Henpecked(alisha)\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Tenured(x))\n\nnot Ironshod(alisha)\n\nnot Ironshod(alisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Drew is homosexual. Drew is laurelled. Drew is bullish. Florida is laurelled. Florida is saxicolous. Austen is subdural. Austen is bullish. Green things are saxicolous. If Drew is saxicolous and Drew is unexciting then Drew is subdural. If Drew is petulant then Drew is not subdural. All subdural things are bullish. If something is bullish and homosexual then it is subdural. Big things are unexciting. If Florida is unexciting then Florida is subdural. If something is unexciting then it is laurelled. Florida is homosexual.", "logic": "\nHomosexual(drew)\nLaurelled(drew)\nBullish(drew)\nLaurelled(florida)\nSaxicolous(florida)\nSubdural(austen)\nBullish(austen)\nforall x (Laurelled(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nSaxicolous(drew) and Unexciting(drew) -> Subdural(drew)\nPetulant(drew) -> not Subdural(drew)\nforall x (Subdural(x) -> Bullish(x))\nforall x (Bullish(x) and Homosexual(x) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Subdural(x) -> Unexciting(x))\nUnexciting(florida) -> Subdural(florida)\nforall x (Unexciting(x) -> Laurelled(x))\n\nHomosexual(florida)\n\nHomosexual(florida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1213"} {"premises": "Carie is relevant. Carie is timely. Carie is salutary. Carie is homologic. Merralee is alfresco. Merralee is salutary. Merralee is homologic. All vulturine things are relevant. If something is heedful and salutary then it is homologic. All alfresco things are vulturine. Merralee is salutary.", "logic": "\nRelevant(carie)\nTimely(carie)\nSalutary(carie)\nHomologic(carie)\nAlfresco(merralee)\nSalutary(merralee)\nHomologic(merralee)\nforall x (Vulturine(x) -> Relevant(x))\nforall x (Heedful(x) and Salutary(x) -> Homologic(x))\nforall x (Alfresco(x) -> Vulturine(x))\n\nSalutary(merralee)\n\ntherefore Salutary(merralee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Yankee is governable. Yankee is faceted. Yankee is thirty. Yankee is resiny. Randal is dazzling. Randal is thirty. Randal is resiny. All fulgent things are governable. If something is scurrilous and thirty then it is resiny. All dazzling things are fulgent. Randal is not thirty.", "logic": "\nGovernable(yankee)\nFaceted(yankee)\nThirty(yankee)\nResiny(yankee)\nDazzling(randal)\nThirty(randal)\nResiny(randal)\nforall x (Fulgent(x) -> Governable(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) and Thirty(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Dazzling(x) -> Fulgent(x))\n\nnot Thirty(randal)\n\ntherefore Thirty(randal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Silvanus is mortified. Silvanus is geocentric. Silvanus is enchanted. Silvanus is admired. Rodrigo is seasonable. Rodrigo is enchanted. Rodrigo is admired. All hugoesque things are mortified. If something is giant and enchanted then it is admired. All seasonable things are hugoesque. Rodrigo is hugoesque.", "logic": "\nMortified(silvanus)\nGeocentric(silvanus)\nEnchanted(silvanus)\nAdmired(silvanus)\nSeasonable(rodrigo)\nEnchanted(rodrigo)\nAdmired(rodrigo)\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) -> Mortified(x))\nforall x (Giant(x) and Enchanted(x) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Seasonable(x) -> Hugoesque(x))\n\nHugoesque(rodrigo)\n\nSeasonable(rodrigo) and forall x (Seasonable(x) -> Hugoesque(x)) -> therefore Hugoesque(rodrigo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Clarie is mourning. Clarie is wedged. Clarie is batwing. Clarie is lucrative. Millicent is sufficient. Millicent is batwing. Millicent is lucrative. All packed things are mourning. If something is headlong and batwing then it is lucrative. All sufficient things are packed. Millicent is not packed.", "logic": "\nMourning(clarie)\nWedged(clarie)\nBatwing(clarie)\nLucrative(clarie)\nSufficient(millicent)\nBatwing(millicent)\nLucrative(millicent)\nforall x (Packed(x) -> Mourning(x))\nforall x (Headlong(x) and Batwing(x) -> Lucrative(x))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) -> Packed(x))\n\nnot Packed(millicent)\n\nSufficient(millicent) and forall x (Sufficient(x) -> Packed(x)) -> therefore Packed(millicent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Astrid is less. Astrid is undercover. Astrid is nominated. Astrid is calcific. Lucita is nephritic. Lucita is nominated. Lucita is calcific. All sandy things are less. If something is irate and nominated then it is calcific. All nephritic things are sandy. Lucita is less.", "logic": "\nLess(astrid)\nUndercover(astrid)\nNominated(astrid)\nCalcific(astrid)\nNephritic(lucita)\nNominated(lucita)\nCalcific(lucita)\nforall x (Sandy(x) -> Less(x))\nforall x (Irate(x) and Nominated(x) -> Calcific(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) -> Sandy(x))\n\nLess(lucita)\n\nNephritic(lucita) and forall x (Nephritic(x) -> Sandy(x)) -> therefore Sandy(lucita) Sandy(lucita) and forall x (Sandy(x) -> Less(x)) -> therefore Less(lucita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Herrmann is assonant. Herrmann is paralytic. Herrmann is infectious. Herrmann is heroical. Halley is webby. Halley is infectious. Halley is heroical. All sicilian things are assonant. If something is sorrowful and infectious then it is heroical. All webby things are sicilian. Halley is not assonant.", "logic": "\nAssonant(herrmann)\nParalytic(herrmann)\nInfectious(herrmann)\nHeroical(herrmann)\nWebby(halley)\nInfectious(halley)\nHeroical(halley)\nforall x (Sicilian(x) -> Assonant(x))\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) and Infectious(x) -> Heroical(x))\nforall x (Webby(x) -> Sicilian(x))\n\nnot Assonant(halley)\n\nWebby(halley) and forall x (Webby(x) -> Sicilian(x)) -> therefore Sicilian(halley) Sicilian(halley) and forall x (Sicilian(x) -> Assonant(x)) -> therefore Assonant(halley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Nessa is dietetical. Nessa is unmined. Nessa is hesitant. Nessa is delphian. Olwen is noncyclic. Olwen is hesitant. Olwen is delphian. All verbalized things are dietetical. If something is bodyless and hesitant then it is delphian. All noncyclic things are verbalized. Nessa is not verbalized.", "logic": "\nDietetical(nessa)\nUnmined(nessa)\nHesitant(nessa)\nDelphian(nessa)\nNoncyclic(olwen)\nHesitant(olwen)\nDelphian(olwen)\nforall x (Verbalized(x) -> Dietetical(x))\nforall x (Bodyless(x) and Hesitant(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Verbalized(x))\n\nnot Verbalized(nessa)\n\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Verbalized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Alice is projecting. Alice is hale. Alice is sibyllic. Alice is apathetic. Romy is tribal. Romy is sibyllic. Romy is apathetic. All crucial things are projecting. If something is modeled and sibyllic then it is apathetic. All tribal things are crucial. Alice is tribal.", "logic": "\nProjecting(alice)\nHale(alice)\nSibyllic(alice)\nApathetic(alice)\nTribal(romy)\nSibyllic(romy)\nApathetic(romy)\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Projecting(x))\nforall x (Modeled(x) and Sibyllic(x) -> Apathetic(x))\nforall x (Tribal(x) -> Crucial(x))\n\nTribal(alice)\n\nTribal(alice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Winnifred is zairese. Winnifred is satanic. Winnifred is roughshod. Winnifred is striking. Hinda is peculiar. Hinda is roughshod. Hinda is striking. All marmoreal things are zairese. If something is buccal and roughshod then it is striking. All peculiar things are marmoreal. Hinda is not satanic.", "logic": "\nZairese(winnifred)\nSatanic(winnifred)\nRoughshod(winnifred)\nStriking(winnifred)\nPeculiar(hinda)\nRoughshod(hinda)\nStriking(hinda)\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Zairese(x))\nforall x (Buccal(x) and Roughshod(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\n\nnot Satanic(hinda)\n\nnot Satanic(hinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Myron is reedy. Myron is sultry. Myron is cityfied. Myron is alexic. Rubi is triclinic. Rubi is cityfied. Rubi is alexic. All artificial things are reedy. If something is teachable and cityfied then it is alexic. All triclinic things are artificial. Myron is teachable.", "logic": "\nReedy(myron)\nSultry(myron)\nCityfied(myron)\nAlexic(myron)\nTriclinic(rubi)\nCityfied(rubi)\nAlexic(rubi)\nforall x (Artificial(x) -> Reedy(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) and Cityfied(x) -> Alexic(x))\nforall x (Triclinic(x) -> Artificial(x))\n\nTeachable(myron)\n\nTeachable(myron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2355"} {"premises": "Elfrieda is felonious. Deerdre is squishy. Sharity is felonious. Jenica is not felonious. If something is mensural and felonious then it is separatist. All averse, achy things are not separatist. All unerasable things are separatist. All achy things are mensural. Nice things are felonious. Round, felonious things are achy. If something is felonious then it is achy. If something is separatist then it is unerasable. Sharity is felonious.", "logic": "\nFelonious(elfrieda)\nSquishy(deerdre)\nFelonious(sharity)\nnot Felonious(jenica)\nforall x (Mensural(x) and Felonious(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Averse(x) and Achy(x) -> not Separatist(x))\nforall x (Unerasable(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Achy(x) -> Mensural(x))\nforall x (Achy(x) -> Felonious(x))\nforall x (Averse(x) and Felonious(x) -> Achy(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) -> Achy(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Unerasable(x))\n\nFelonious(sharity)\n\ntherefore Felonious(sharity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Larisa is hatted. Rozele is fistular. Roger is hatted. Julienne is not hatted. If something is adulterate and hatted then it is knowable. All aspheric, alopecic things are not knowable. All lettered things are knowable. All alopecic things are adulterate. Nice things are hatted. Round, hatted things are alopecic. If something is hatted then it is alopecic. If something is knowable then it is lettered. Rozele is not fistular.", "logic": "\nHatted(larisa)\nFistular(rozele)\nHatted(roger)\nnot Hatted(julienne)\nforall x (Adulterate(x) and Hatted(x) -> Knowable(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) and Alopecic(x) -> not Knowable(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Knowable(x))\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) and Hatted(x) -> Alopecic(x))\nforall x (Hatted(x) -> Alopecic(x))\nforall x (Knowable(x) -> Lettered(x))\n\nnot Fistular(rozele)\n\ntherefore Fistular(rozele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Merci is unsullied. Emily is chartreuse. Esmaria is unsullied. Angela is not unsullied. If something is lineal and unsullied then it is veiled. All staged, middling things are not veiled. All suspect things are veiled. All middling things are lineal. Nice things are unsullied. Round, unsullied things are middling. If something is unsullied then it is middling. If something is veiled then it is suspect. Esmaria is middling.", "logic": "\nUnsullied(merci)\nChartreuse(emily)\nUnsullied(esmaria)\nnot Unsullied(angela)\nforall x (Lineal(x) and Unsullied(x) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) and Middling(x) -> not Veiled(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Lineal(x))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Unsullied(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) and Unsullied(x) -> Middling(x))\nforall x (Unsullied(x) -> Middling(x))\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> Suspect(x))\n\nMiddling(esmaria)\n\nUnsullied(esmaria) and forall x (Unsullied(x) -> Middling(x)) -> therefore Middling(esmaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Pate is amphoric. Rinaldo is simplified. Lyndsey is amphoric. Daune is not amphoric. If something is brumous and amphoric then it is confirming. All hortatory, cumbrous things are not confirming. All unmedical things are confirming. All cumbrous things are brumous. Nice things are amphoric. Round, amphoric things are cumbrous. If something is amphoric then it is cumbrous. If something is confirming then it is unmedical. Lyndsey is not cumbrous.", "logic": "\nAmphoric(pate)\nSimplified(rinaldo)\nAmphoric(lyndsey)\nnot Amphoric(daune)\nforall x (Brumous(x) and Amphoric(x) -> Confirming(x))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) and Cumbrous(x) -> not Confirming(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) -> Confirming(x))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Brumous(x))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Amphoric(x))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) and Amphoric(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nforall x (Amphoric(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nforall x (Confirming(x) -> Unmedical(x))\n\nnot Cumbrous(lyndsey)\n\nAmphoric(lyndsey) and forall x (Amphoric(x) -> Cumbrous(x)) -> therefore Cumbrous(lyndsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Hilda is refreshful. Adi is biaxial. Sean is refreshful. Meggy is not refreshful. If something is stumpy and refreshful then it is durable. All excursive, squab things are not durable. All cytotoxic things are durable. All squab things are stumpy. Nice things are refreshful. Round, refreshful things are squab. If something is refreshful then it is squab. If something is durable then it is cytotoxic. Hilda is stumpy.", "logic": "\nRefreshful(hilda)\nBiaxial(adi)\nRefreshful(sean)\nnot Refreshful(meggy)\nforall x (Stumpy(x) and Refreshful(x) -> Durable(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Squab(x) -> not Durable(x))\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Durable(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Refreshful(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Refreshful(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Refreshful(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\n\nStumpy(hilda)\n\nRefreshful(hilda) and forall x (Refreshful(x) -> Squab(x)) -> therefore Squab(hilda) Squab(hilda) and forall x (Squab(x) -> Stumpy(x)) -> therefore Stumpy(hilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Querida is gainly. Otes is annelidan. Nicolette is gainly. Nikolai is not gainly. If something is unclean and gainly then it is standing. All mordant, hindoo things are not standing. All scorbutic things are standing. All hindoo things are unclean. Nice things are gainly. Round, gainly things are hindoo. If something is gainly then it is hindoo. If something is standing then it is scorbutic. Querida is not unclean.", "logic": "\nGainly(querida)\nAnnelidan(otes)\nGainly(nicolette)\nnot Gainly(nikolai)\nforall x (Unclean(x) and Gainly(x) -> Standing(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Hindoo(x) -> not Standing(x))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) -> Standing(x))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) -> Unclean(x))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) -> Gainly(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Gainly(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nforall x (Standing(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\n\nnot Unclean(querida)\n\nGainly(querida) and forall x (Gainly(x) -> Hindoo(x)) -> therefore Hindoo(querida) Hindoo(querida) and forall x (Hindoo(x) -> Unclean(x)) -> therefore Unclean(querida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Maury is psychotic. Blondie is sealed. Mirilla is psychotic. Barthel is not psychotic. If something is adjunctive and psychotic then it is lazy. All moralistic, unfettered things are not lazy. All unbraced things are lazy. All unfettered things are adjunctive. Nice things are psychotic. Round, psychotic things are unfettered. If something is psychotic then it is unfettered. If something is lazy then it is unbraced. Barthel is not adjunctive.", "logic": "\nPsychotic(maury)\nSealed(blondie)\nPsychotic(mirilla)\nnot Psychotic(barthel)\nforall x (Adjunctive(x) and Psychotic(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) and Unfettered(x) -> not Lazy(x))\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Unfettered(x) -> Adjunctive(x))\nforall x (Unfettered(x) -> Psychotic(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) and Psychotic(x) -> Unfettered(x))\nforall x (Psychotic(x) -> Unfettered(x))\nforall x (Lazy(x) -> Unbraced(x))\n\nnot Adjunctive(barthel)\n\nforall x (Unfettered(x) -> Adjunctive(x)) <- forall x (Moralistic(x) and Psychotic(x) -> Unfettered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Emmaline is reverend. Annabella is tartarean. Anjela is reverend. Padraig is not reverend. If something is wavering and reverend then it is gregarious. All officious, desired things are not gregarious. All bedless things are gregarious. All desired things are wavering. Nice things are reverend. Round, reverend things are desired. If something is reverend then it is desired. If something is gregarious then it is bedless. Annabella is reverend.", "logic": "\nReverend(emmaline)\nTartarean(annabella)\nReverend(anjela)\nnot Reverend(padraig)\nforall x (Wavering(x) and Reverend(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) and Desired(x) -> not Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Bedless(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Desired(x) -> Wavering(x))\nforall x (Desired(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) and Reverend(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Reverend(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Gregarious(x) -> Bedless(x))\n\nReverend(annabella)\n\nforall x (Desired(x) -> Reverend(x)) <- forall x (Officious(x) and Reverend(x) -> Desired(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Marcel is cruciate. Marga is desiccated. Catherine is cruciate. Alonso is not cruciate. If something is gouty and cruciate then it is travelable. All millionth, wayfaring things are not travelable. All sclerosed things are travelable. All wayfaring things are gouty. Nice things are cruciate. Round, cruciate things are wayfaring. If something is cruciate then it is wayfaring. If something is travelable then it is sclerosed. Marga is not travelable.", "logic": "\nCruciate(marcel)\nDesiccated(marga)\nCruciate(catherine)\nnot Cruciate(alonso)\nforall x (Gouty(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Millionth(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> not Travelable(x))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Gouty(x))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Millionth(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Cruciate(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Travelable(x) -> Sclerosed(x))\n\nnot Travelable(marga)\n\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Travelable(x)) <- forall x (Travelable(x) -> Sclerosed(x)) <- forall x (Gouty(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Travelable(x)) <- forall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Cruciate(x)) <- forall x (Millionth(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Wayfaring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Jocelyne is tenebrous. Caroline is bespoken. Tildie is tenebrous. Quigman is not tenebrous. If something is ivied and tenebrous then it is seeing. All piteous, alated things are not seeing. All wisplike things are seeing. All alated things are ivied. Nice things are tenebrous. Round, tenebrous things are alated. If something is tenebrous then it is alated. If something is seeing then it is wisplike. Quigman is bespoken.", "logic": "\nTenebrous(jocelyne)\nBespoken(caroline)\nTenebrous(tildie)\nnot Tenebrous(quigman)\nforall x (Ivied(x) and Tenebrous(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Alated(x) -> not Seeing(x))\nforall x (Wisplike(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Ivied(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Tenebrous(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Tenebrous(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Wisplike(x))\n\nBespoken(quigman)\n\nBespoken(quigman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Woody is unranked. Viviyan is beechen. Bell is unranked. Ulberto is not unranked. If something is nodulose and unranked then it is shameless. All glaswegian, flying things are not shameless. All colonial things are shameless. All flying things are nodulose. Nice things are unranked. Round, unranked things are flying. If something is unranked then it is flying. If something is shameless then it is colonial. Woody is not glaswegian.", "logic": "\nUnranked(woody)\nBeechen(viviyan)\nUnranked(bell)\nnot Unranked(ulberto)\nforall x (Nodulose(x) and Unranked(x) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) and Flying(x) -> not Shameless(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Nodulose(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Unranked(x))\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) and Unranked(x) -> Flying(x))\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> Flying(x))\nforall x (Shameless(x) -> Colonial(x))\n\nnot Glaswegian(woody)\n\nnot Glaswegian(woody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "Felicle is cyprian. Linn is ungusseted. Ebenezer is cyprian. Genovera is not cyprian. If something is loony and cyprian then it is reniform. All despotic, evaluative things are not reniform. All opposed things are reniform. All evaluative things are loony. Nice things are cyprian. Round, cyprian things are evaluative. If something is cyprian then it is evaluative. If something is reniform then it is opposed. Ebenezer is ungusseted.", "logic": "\nCyprian(felicle)\nUngusseted(linn)\nCyprian(ebenezer)\nnot Cyprian(genovera)\nforall x (Loony(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Reniform(x))\nforall x (Despotic(x) and Evaluative(x) -> not Reniform(x))\nforall x (Opposed(x) -> Reniform(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Loony(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Despotic(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Evaluative(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Evaluative(x))\nforall x (Reniform(x) -> Opposed(x))\n\nUngusseted(ebenezer)\n\nUngusseted(ebenezer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The alane is nonuniform. The alane does not like the ellis. The alane inseminate the ellis. The alane walk the thad. The thad is nonuniform. The thad advertise the alane. The ellis is amoebic. The ellis is rudderless. The ellis does not like the thad. The ellis inseminate the alane. The ellis does not need the thad. The ellis does not need the lennie. The ellis walk the thad. The lennie is xcvii. The lennie advertise the alane. The lennie walk the ellis. If something advertise the ellis then the ellis advertise the alane. If something walk the lennie and it inseminate the lennie then the lennie is amoebic. If something walk the ellis then it advertise the ellis. The thad is nonuniform.", "logic": "\nNonuniform(alane)\nnot Advertise(alane, ellis)\nInseminate(alane, ellis)\nWalk(alane, thad)\nNonuniform(thad)\nAdvertise(thad, alane)\nAmoebic(ellis)\nRudderless(ellis)\nnot Advertise(ellis, thad)\nInseminate(ellis, alane)\nnot Inseminate(ellis, thad)\nnot Inseminate(ellis, lennie)\nWalk(ellis, thad)\nXcvii(lennie)\nAdvertise(lennie, alane)\nWalk(lennie, ellis)\nforall x (Advertise(x, ellis) -> Advertise(ellis, alane))\nforall x (Walk(x, lennie) and Inseminate(x, lennie) -> Amoebic(lennie))\nforall x (Walk(x, ellis) -> Advertise(x, ellis))\n\nNonuniform(thad)\n\ntherefore Nonuniform(thad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The jobey is timeless. The jobey does not like the denyse. The jobey unhinge the denyse. The jobey whiteout the elinore. The elinore is timeless. The elinore pivot the jobey. The denyse is slavic. The denyse is aneuploid. The denyse does not like the elinore. The denyse unhinge the jobey. The denyse does not need the elinore. The denyse does not need the glynnis. The denyse whiteout the elinore. The glynnis is botuliform. The glynnis pivot the jobey. The glynnis whiteout the denyse. If something pivot the denyse then the denyse pivot the jobey. If something whiteout the glynnis and it unhinge the glynnis then the glynnis is slavic. If something whiteout the denyse then it pivot the denyse. The denyse pivot the elinore.", "logic": "\nTimeless(jobey)\nnot Pivot(jobey, denyse)\nUnhinge(jobey, denyse)\nWhiteout(jobey, elinore)\nTimeless(elinore)\nPivot(elinore, jobey)\nSlavic(denyse)\nAneuploid(denyse)\nnot Pivot(denyse, elinore)\nUnhinge(denyse, jobey)\nnot Unhinge(denyse, elinore)\nnot Unhinge(denyse, glynnis)\nWhiteout(denyse, elinore)\nBotuliform(glynnis)\nPivot(glynnis, jobey)\nWhiteout(glynnis, denyse)\nforall x (Pivot(x, denyse) -> Pivot(denyse, jobey))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, glynnis) and Unhinge(x, glynnis) -> Slavic(glynnis))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, denyse) -> Pivot(x, denyse))\n\nPivot(denyse, elinore)\n\ntherefore not Pivot(denyse, elinore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The joell is springlike. The joell does not like the pamella. The joell preface the pamella. The joell complete the jesus. The jesus is springlike. The jesus declare the joell. The pamella is undyed. The pamella is barefoot. The pamella does not like the jesus. The pamella preface the joell. The pamella does not need the jesus. The pamella does not need the hew. The pamella complete the jesus. The hew is effectual. The hew declare the joell. The hew complete the pamella. If something declare the pamella then the pamella declare the joell. If something complete the hew and it preface the hew then the hew is undyed. If something complete the pamella then it declare the pamella. The hew declare the pamella.", "logic": "\nSpringlike(joell)\nnot Declare(joell, pamella)\nPreface(joell, pamella)\nComplete(joell, jesus)\nSpringlike(jesus)\nDeclare(jesus, joell)\nUndyed(pamella)\nBarefoot(pamella)\nnot Declare(pamella, jesus)\nPreface(pamella, joell)\nnot Preface(pamella, jesus)\nnot Preface(pamella, hew)\nComplete(pamella, jesus)\nEffectual(hew)\nDeclare(hew, joell)\nComplete(hew, pamella)\nforall x (Declare(x, pamella) -> Declare(pamella, joell))\nforall x (Complete(x, hew) and Preface(x, hew) -> Undyed(hew))\nforall x (Complete(x, pamella) -> Declare(x, pamella))\n\nDeclare(hew, pamella)\n\nComplete(hew, pamella) and forall x (Complete(x, pamella) -> Declare(x, pamella)) -> therefore Declare(hew, pamella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The vinnie is unoiled. The vinnie does not like the anetta. The vinnie disgorge the anetta. The vinnie cohabit the leandra. The leandra is unoiled. The leandra stain the vinnie. The anetta is acarpous. The anetta is grassroots. The anetta does not like the leandra. The anetta disgorge the vinnie. The anetta does not need the leandra. The anetta does not need the shamit. The anetta cohabit the leandra. The shamit is grizzled. The shamit stain the vinnie. The shamit cohabit the anetta. If something stain the anetta then the anetta stain the vinnie. If something cohabit the shamit and it disgorge the shamit then the shamit is acarpous. If something cohabit the anetta then it stain the anetta. The shamit does not like the anetta.", "logic": "\nUnoiled(vinnie)\nnot Stain(vinnie, anetta)\nDisgorge(vinnie, anetta)\nCohabit(vinnie, leandra)\nUnoiled(leandra)\nStain(leandra, vinnie)\nAcarpous(anetta)\nGrassroots(anetta)\nnot Stain(anetta, leandra)\nDisgorge(anetta, vinnie)\nnot Disgorge(anetta, leandra)\nnot Disgorge(anetta, shamit)\nCohabit(anetta, leandra)\nGrizzled(shamit)\nStain(shamit, vinnie)\nCohabit(shamit, anetta)\nforall x (Stain(x, anetta) -> Stain(anetta, vinnie))\nforall x (Cohabit(x, shamit) and Disgorge(x, shamit) -> Acarpous(shamit))\nforall x (Cohabit(x, anetta) -> Stain(x, anetta))\n\nnot Stain(shamit, anetta)\n\nCohabit(shamit, anetta) and forall x (Cohabit(x, anetta) -> Stain(x, anetta)) -> therefore Stain(shamit, anetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The chariot is adept. The chariot does not like the samson. The chariot commove the samson. The chariot deodorise the simonne. The simonne is adept. The simonne somersault the chariot. The samson is skilful. The samson is honey. The samson does not like the simonne. The samson commove the chariot. The samson does not need the simonne. The samson does not need the delinda. The samson deodorise the simonne. The delinda is manageable. The delinda somersault the chariot. The delinda deodorise the samson. If something somersault the samson then the samson somersault the chariot. If something deodorise the delinda and it commove the delinda then the delinda is skilful. If something deodorise the samson then it somersault the samson. The samson somersault the chariot.", "logic": "\nAdept(chariot)\nnot Somersault(chariot, samson)\nCommove(chariot, samson)\nDeodorise(chariot, simonne)\nAdept(simonne)\nSomersault(simonne, chariot)\nSkilful(samson)\nHoney(samson)\nnot Somersault(samson, simonne)\nCommove(samson, chariot)\nnot Commove(samson, simonne)\nnot Commove(samson, delinda)\nDeodorise(samson, simonne)\nManageable(delinda)\nSomersault(delinda, chariot)\nDeodorise(delinda, samson)\nforall x (Somersault(x, samson) -> Somersault(samson, chariot))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, delinda) and Commove(x, delinda) -> Skilful(delinda))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, samson) -> Somersault(x, samson))\n\nSomersault(samson, chariot)\n\nDeodorise(delinda, samson) and forall x (Deodorise(x, samson) -> Somersault(x, samson)) -> therefore Somersault(delinda, samson) Somersault(delinda, samson) and forall x (Somersault(x, samson) -> Somersault(samson, chariot)) -> therefore Somersault(samson, chariot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The mark is lyrate. The mark does not like the katrinka. The mark clone the katrinka. The mark loathe the gerold. The gerold is lyrate. The gerold reek the mark. The katrinka is impelled. The katrinka is majuscule. The katrinka does not like the gerold. The katrinka clone the mark. The katrinka does not need the gerold. The katrinka does not need the ardyth. The katrinka loathe the gerold. The ardyth is allegiant. The ardyth reek the mark. The ardyth loathe the katrinka. If something reek the katrinka then the katrinka reek the mark. If something loathe the ardyth and it clone the ardyth then the ardyth is impelled. If something loathe the katrinka then it reek the katrinka. The katrinka does not like the mark.", "logic": "\nLyrate(mark)\nnot Reek(mark, katrinka)\nClone(mark, katrinka)\nLoathe(mark, gerold)\nLyrate(gerold)\nReek(gerold, mark)\nImpelled(katrinka)\nMajuscule(katrinka)\nnot Reek(katrinka, gerold)\nClone(katrinka, mark)\nnot Clone(katrinka, gerold)\nnot Clone(katrinka, ardyth)\nLoathe(katrinka, gerold)\nAllegiant(ardyth)\nReek(ardyth, mark)\nLoathe(ardyth, katrinka)\nforall x (Reek(x, katrinka) -> Reek(katrinka, mark))\nforall x (Loathe(x, ardyth) and Clone(x, ardyth) -> Impelled(ardyth))\nforall x (Loathe(x, katrinka) -> Reek(x, katrinka))\n\nnot Reek(katrinka, mark)\n\nLoathe(ardyth, katrinka) and forall x (Loathe(x, katrinka) -> Reek(x, katrinka)) -> therefore Reek(ardyth, katrinka) Reek(ardyth, katrinka) and forall x (Reek(x, katrinka) -> Reek(katrinka, mark)) -> therefore Reek(katrinka, mark)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The duffy is bisexual. The duffy does not like the clemence. The duffy hoot the clemence. The duffy commix the matilde. The matilde is bisexual. The matilde serve the duffy. The clemence is impuissant. The clemence is done. The clemence does not like the matilde. The clemence hoot the duffy. The clemence does not need the matilde. The clemence does not need the marina. The clemence commix the matilde. The marina is uveous. The marina serve the duffy. The marina commix the clemence. If something serve the clemence then the clemence serve the duffy. If something commix the marina and it hoot the marina then the marina is impuissant. If something commix the clemence then it serve the clemence. The matilde does not like the clemence.", "logic": "\nBisexual(duffy)\nnot Serve(duffy, clemence)\nHoot(duffy, clemence)\nCommix(duffy, matilde)\nBisexual(matilde)\nServe(matilde, duffy)\nImpuissant(clemence)\nDone(clemence)\nnot Serve(clemence, matilde)\nHoot(clemence, duffy)\nnot Hoot(clemence, matilde)\nnot Hoot(clemence, marina)\nCommix(clemence, matilde)\nUveous(marina)\nServe(marina, duffy)\nCommix(marina, clemence)\nforall x (Serve(x, clemence) -> Serve(clemence, duffy))\nforall x (Commix(x, marina) and Hoot(x, marina) -> Impuissant(marina))\nforall x (Commix(x, clemence) -> Serve(x, clemence))\n\nnot Serve(matilde, clemence)\n\nforall x (Commix(x, clemence) -> Serve(x, clemence)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The dania is imposing. The dania does not like the phoebe. The dania scam the phoebe. The dania poniard the rey. The rey is imposing. The rey motion the dania. The phoebe is placental. The phoebe is rackety. The phoebe does not like the rey. The phoebe scam the dania. The phoebe does not need the rey. The phoebe does not need the inglebert. The phoebe poniard the rey. The inglebert is ungracious. The inglebert motion the dania. The inglebert poniard the phoebe. If something motion the phoebe then the phoebe motion the dania. If something poniard the inglebert and it scam the inglebert then the inglebert is placental. If something poniard the phoebe then it motion the phoebe. The phoebe motion the phoebe.", "logic": "\nImposing(dania)\nnot Motion(dania, phoebe)\nScam(dania, phoebe)\nPoniard(dania, rey)\nImposing(rey)\nMotion(rey, dania)\nPlacental(phoebe)\nRackety(phoebe)\nnot Motion(phoebe, rey)\nScam(phoebe, dania)\nnot Scam(phoebe, rey)\nnot Scam(phoebe, inglebert)\nPoniard(phoebe, rey)\nUngracious(inglebert)\nMotion(inglebert, dania)\nPoniard(inglebert, phoebe)\nforall x (Motion(x, phoebe) -> Motion(phoebe, dania))\nforall x (Poniard(x, inglebert) and Scam(x, inglebert) -> Placental(inglebert))\nforall x (Poniard(x, phoebe) -> Motion(x, phoebe))\n\nMotion(phoebe, phoebe)\n\nforall x (Poniard(x, phoebe) -> Motion(x, phoebe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The mathias is miraculous. The mathias does not like the werner. The mathias frequent the werner. The mathias compile the adelina. The adelina is miraculous. The adelina impeach the mathias. The werner is unlocked. The werner is crass. The werner does not like the adelina. The werner frequent the mathias. The werner does not need the adelina. The werner does not need the louise. The werner compile the adelina. The louise is aflame. The louise impeach the mathias. The louise compile the werner. If something impeach the werner then the werner impeach the mathias. If something compile the louise and it frequent the louise then the louise is unlocked. If something compile the werner then it impeach the werner. The louise is not unlocked.", "logic": "\nMiraculous(mathias)\nnot Impeach(mathias, werner)\nFrequent(mathias, werner)\nCompile(mathias, adelina)\nMiraculous(adelina)\nImpeach(adelina, mathias)\nUnlocked(werner)\nCrass(werner)\nnot Impeach(werner, adelina)\nFrequent(werner, mathias)\nnot Frequent(werner, adelina)\nnot Frequent(werner, louise)\nCompile(werner, adelina)\nAflame(louise)\nImpeach(louise, mathias)\nCompile(louise, werner)\nforall x (Impeach(x, werner) -> Impeach(werner, mathias))\nforall x (Compile(x, louise) and Frequent(x, louise) -> Unlocked(louise))\nforall x (Compile(x, werner) -> Impeach(x, werner))\n\nnot Unlocked(louise)\n\nforall x (Compile(x, louise) and Frequent(x, louise) -> Unlocked(louise)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The magna is dendroid. The magna does not like the bobina. The magna sequence the bobina. The magna obey the lila. The lila is dendroid. The lila massacre the magna. The bobina is agaze. The bobina is nomadic. The bobina does not like the lila. The bobina sequence the magna. The bobina does not need the lila. The bobina does not need the corny. The bobina obey the lila. The corny is haematal. The corny massacre the magna. The corny obey the bobina. If something massacre the bobina then the bobina massacre the magna. If something obey the corny and it sequence the corny then the corny is agaze. If something obey the bobina then it massacre the bobina. The lila massacre the lila.", "logic": "\nDendroid(magna)\nnot Massacre(magna, bobina)\nSequence(magna, bobina)\nObey(magna, lila)\nDendroid(lila)\nMassacre(lila, magna)\nAgaze(bobina)\nNomadic(bobina)\nnot Massacre(bobina, lila)\nSequence(bobina, magna)\nnot Sequence(bobina, lila)\nnot Sequence(bobina, corny)\nObey(bobina, lila)\nHaematal(corny)\nMassacre(corny, magna)\nObey(corny, bobina)\nforall x (Massacre(x, bobina) -> Massacre(bobina, magna))\nforall x (Obey(x, corny) and Sequence(x, corny) -> Agaze(corny))\nforall x (Obey(x, bobina) -> Massacre(x, bobina))\n\nMassacre(lila, lila)\n\nMassacre(lila, lila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The conni is twenty. The conni does not like the rosana. The conni clang the rosana. The conni rehearse the jacklyn. The jacklyn is twenty. The jacklyn plump the conni. The rosana is radiating. The rosana is olden. The rosana does not like the jacklyn. The rosana clang the conni. The rosana does not need the jacklyn. The rosana does not need the fox. The rosana rehearse the jacklyn. The fox is blame. The fox plump the conni. The fox rehearse the rosana. If something plump the rosana then the rosana plump the conni. If something rehearse the fox and it clang the fox then the fox is radiating. If something rehearse the rosana then it plump the rosana. The conni is not olden.", "logic": "\nTwenty(conni)\nnot Plump(conni, rosana)\nClang(conni, rosana)\nRehearse(conni, jacklyn)\nTwenty(jacklyn)\nPlump(jacklyn, conni)\nRadiating(rosana)\nOlden(rosana)\nnot Plump(rosana, jacklyn)\nClang(rosana, conni)\nnot Clang(rosana, jacklyn)\nnot Clang(rosana, fox)\nRehearse(rosana, jacklyn)\nBlame(fox)\nPlump(fox, conni)\nRehearse(fox, rosana)\nforall x (Plump(x, rosana) -> Plump(rosana, conni))\nforall x (Rehearse(x, fox) and Clang(x, fox) -> Radiating(fox))\nforall x (Rehearse(x, rosana) -> Plump(x, rosana))\n\nnot Olden(conni)\n\nnot Olden(conni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "The natka is conformist. The natka does not like the blanca. The natka frank the blanca. The natka rasterize the carlton. The carlton is conformist. The carlton savour the natka. The blanca is socialized. The blanca is bisulcate. The blanca does not like the carlton. The blanca frank the natka. The blanca does not need the carlton. The blanca does not need the walsh. The blanca rasterize the carlton. The walsh is extrinsic. The walsh savour the natka. The walsh rasterize the blanca. If something savour the blanca then the blanca savour the natka. If something rasterize the walsh and it frank the walsh then the walsh is socialized. If something rasterize the blanca then it savour the blanca. The natka rasterize the walsh.", "logic": "\nConformist(natka)\nnot Savour(natka, blanca)\nFrank(natka, blanca)\nRasterize(natka, carlton)\nConformist(carlton)\nSavour(carlton, natka)\nSocialized(blanca)\nBisulcate(blanca)\nnot Savour(blanca, carlton)\nFrank(blanca, natka)\nnot Frank(blanca, carlton)\nnot Frank(blanca, walsh)\nRasterize(blanca, carlton)\nExtrinsic(walsh)\nSavour(walsh, natka)\nRasterize(walsh, blanca)\nforall x (Savour(x, blanca) -> Savour(blanca, natka))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, walsh) and Frank(x, walsh) -> Socialized(walsh))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, blanca) -> Savour(x, blanca))\n\nRasterize(natka, walsh)\n\nRasterize(natka, walsh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1478"} {"premises": "Stig is tuneful. Stig is frisky. Beitris is momentous. Beitris is willing. Hilliard is tuneful. Hilliard is not frisky. Hilliard is momentous. Hilliard is eidetic. Hilliard is chopped. Theobald is curdled. Theobald is tuneful. Theobald is frisky. Theobald is momentous. Theobald is eidetic. Theobald is chopped. Theobald is not willing. All willing things are curdled. If something is curdled then it is frisky. Hilliard is momentous.", "logic": "\nTuneful(stig)\nFrisky(stig)\nMomentous(beitris)\nWilling(beitris)\nTuneful(hilliard)\nnot Frisky(hilliard)\nMomentous(hilliard)\nEidetic(hilliard)\nChopped(hilliard)\nCurdled(theobald)\nTuneful(theobald)\nFrisky(theobald)\nMomentous(theobald)\nEidetic(theobald)\nChopped(theobald)\nnot Willing(theobald)\nforall x (Willing(x) -> Curdled(x))\nforall x (Curdled(x) -> Frisky(x))\n\nMomentous(hilliard)\n\ntherefore Momentous(hilliard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Nanete is pedagogic. Nanete is seventieth. Danette is quaternary. Danette is unrefined. Melania is pedagogic. Melania is not seventieth. Melania is quaternary. Melania is omissible. Melania is pressed. Charmion is divine. Charmion is pedagogic. Charmion is seventieth. Charmion is quaternary. Charmion is omissible. Charmion is pressed. Charmion is not unrefined. All unrefined things are divine. If something is divine then it is seventieth. Charmion is not quaternary.", "logic": "\nPedagogic(nanete)\nSeventieth(nanete)\nQuaternary(danette)\nUnrefined(danette)\nPedagogic(melania)\nnot Seventieth(melania)\nQuaternary(melania)\nOmissible(melania)\nPressed(melania)\nDivine(charmion)\nPedagogic(charmion)\nSeventieth(charmion)\nQuaternary(charmion)\nOmissible(charmion)\nPressed(charmion)\nnot Unrefined(charmion)\nforall x (Unrefined(x) -> Divine(x))\nforall x (Divine(x) -> Seventieth(x))\n\nnot Quaternary(charmion)\n\ntherefore Quaternary(charmion)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Carl is illegible. Carl is clarifying. Garcia is derogative. Garcia is enervating. Bryan is illegible. Bryan is not clarifying. Bryan is derogative. Bryan is niggling. Bryan is loath. Rodney is indicative. Rodney is illegible. Rodney is clarifying. Rodney is derogative. Rodney is niggling. Rodney is loath. Rodney is not enervating. All enervating things are indicative. If something is indicative then it is clarifying. Garcia is indicative.", "logic": "\nIllegible(carl)\nClarifying(carl)\nDerogative(garcia)\nEnervating(garcia)\nIllegible(bryan)\nnot Clarifying(bryan)\nDerogative(bryan)\nNiggling(bryan)\nLoath(bryan)\nIndicative(rodney)\nIllegible(rodney)\nClarifying(rodney)\nDerogative(rodney)\nNiggling(rodney)\nLoath(rodney)\nnot Enervating(rodney)\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Indicative(x))\nforall x (Indicative(x) -> Clarifying(x))\n\nIndicative(garcia)\n\nEnervating(garcia) and forall x (Enervating(x) -> Indicative(x)) -> therefore Indicative(garcia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Ben is skeptical. Ben is thorough. Dawson is dress. Dawson is crackers. Giraldo is skeptical. Giraldo is not thorough. Giraldo is dress. Giraldo is techy. Giraldo is furthest. Armand is tormented. Armand is skeptical. Armand is thorough. Armand is dress. Armand is techy. Armand is furthest. Armand is not crackers. All crackers things are tormented. If something is tormented then it is thorough. Dawson is not tormented.", "logic": "\nSkeptical(ben)\nThorough(ben)\nDress(dawson)\nCrackers(dawson)\nSkeptical(giraldo)\nnot Thorough(giraldo)\nDress(giraldo)\nTechy(giraldo)\nFurthest(giraldo)\nTormented(armand)\nSkeptical(armand)\nThorough(armand)\nDress(armand)\nTechy(armand)\nFurthest(armand)\nnot Crackers(armand)\nforall x (Crackers(x) -> Tormented(x))\nforall x (Tormented(x) -> Thorough(x))\n\nnot Tormented(dawson)\n\nCrackers(dawson) and forall x (Crackers(x) -> Tormented(x)) -> therefore Tormented(dawson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Fionna is ribbonlike. Fionna is lithuanian. Jenilee is womanish. Jenilee is anticlinal. Monte is ribbonlike. Monte is not lithuanian. Monte is womanish. Monte is surpassing. Monte is shrubby. Chrystel is ridged. Chrystel is ribbonlike. Chrystel is lithuanian. Chrystel is womanish. Chrystel is surpassing. Chrystel is shrubby. Chrystel is not anticlinal. All anticlinal things are ridged. If something is ridged then it is lithuanian. Jenilee is lithuanian.", "logic": "\nRibbonlike(fionna)\nLithuanian(fionna)\nWomanish(jenilee)\nAnticlinal(jenilee)\nRibbonlike(monte)\nnot Lithuanian(monte)\nWomanish(monte)\nSurpassing(monte)\nShrubby(monte)\nRidged(chrystel)\nRibbonlike(chrystel)\nLithuanian(chrystel)\nWomanish(chrystel)\nSurpassing(chrystel)\nShrubby(chrystel)\nnot Anticlinal(chrystel)\nforall x (Anticlinal(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Ridged(x) -> Lithuanian(x))\n\nLithuanian(jenilee)\n\nAnticlinal(jenilee) and forall x (Anticlinal(x) -> Ridged(x)) -> therefore Ridged(jenilee) Ridged(jenilee) and forall x (Ridged(x) -> Lithuanian(x)) -> therefore Lithuanian(jenilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Tova is irritative. Tova is aldermanic. Louisa is viviparous. Louisa is gradable. Dulcie is irritative. Dulcie is not aldermanic. Dulcie is viviparous. Dulcie is crenulated. Dulcie is coagulable. Sara is acinous. Sara is irritative. Sara is aldermanic. Sara is viviparous. Sara is crenulated. Sara is coagulable. Sara is not gradable. All gradable things are acinous. If something is acinous then it is aldermanic. Louisa is not aldermanic.", "logic": "\nIrritative(tova)\nAldermanic(tova)\nViviparous(louisa)\nGradable(louisa)\nIrritative(dulcie)\nnot Aldermanic(dulcie)\nViviparous(dulcie)\nCrenulated(dulcie)\nCoagulable(dulcie)\nAcinous(sara)\nIrritative(sara)\nAldermanic(sara)\nViviparous(sara)\nCrenulated(sara)\nCoagulable(sara)\nnot Gradable(sara)\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Acinous(x))\nforall x (Acinous(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\n\nnot Aldermanic(louisa)\n\nGradable(louisa) and forall x (Gradable(x) -> Acinous(x)) -> therefore Acinous(louisa) Acinous(louisa) and forall x (Acinous(x) -> Aldermanic(x)) -> therefore Aldermanic(louisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Sullivan is modeled. Sullivan is landed. Lynda is tethered. Lynda is jumbo. Piggy is modeled. Piggy is not landed. Piggy is tethered. Piggy is flooded. Piggy is dirigible. Rochella is assonant. Rochella is modeled. Rochella is landed. Rochella is tethered. Rochella is flooded. Rochella is dirigible. Rochella is not jumbo. All jumbo things are assonant. If something is assonant then it is landed. Sullivan is not assonant.", "logic": "\nModeled(sullivan)\nLanded(sullivan)\nTethered(lynda)\nJumbo(lynda)\nModeled(piggy)\nnot Landed(piggy)\nTethered(piggy)\nFlooded(piggy)\nDirigible(piggy)\nAssonant(rochella)\nModeled(rochella)\nLanded(rochella)\nTethered(rochella)\nFlooded(rochella)\nDirigible(rochella)\nnot Jumbo(rochella)\nforall x (Jumbo(x) -> Assonant(x))\nforall x (Assonant(x) -> Landed(x))\n\nnot Assonant(sullivan)\n\nforall x (Jumbo(x) -> Assonant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Dylan is seventeen. Dylan is timorous. Pandora is broadleaf. Pandora is sectional. Karyn is seventeen. Karyn is not timorous. Karyn is broadleaf. Karyn is tyrannical. Karyn is katari. Leigha is leeward. Leigha is seventeen. Leigha is timorous. Leigha is broadleaf. Leigha is tyrannical. Leigha is katari. Leigha is not sectional. All sectional things are leeward. If something is leeward then it is timorous. Karyn is leeward.", "logic": "\nSeventeen(dylan)\nTimorous(dylan)\nBroadleaf(pandora)\nSectional(pandora)\nSeventeen(karyn)\nnot Timorous(karyn)\nBroadleaf(karyn)\nTyrannical(karyn)\nKatari(karyn)\nLeeward(leigha)\nSeventeen(leigha)\nTimorous(leigha)\nBroadleaf(leigha)\nTyrannical(leigha)\nKatari(leigha)\nnot Sectional(leigha)\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Leeward(x))\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Timorous(x))\n\nLeeward(karyn)\n\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Leeward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Kira is victimized. Kira is abroach. Barnard is picayune. Barnard is quadrate. Cicily is victimized. Cicily is not abroach. Cicily is picayune. Cicily is wondering. Cicily is unbaptized. Pierson is stunned. Pierson is victimized. Pierson is abroach. Pierson is picayune. Pierson is wondering. Pierson is unbaptized. Pierson is not quadrate. All quadrate things are stunned. If something is stunned then it is abroach. Kira is not unbaptized.", "logic": "\nVictimized(kira)\nAbroach(kira)\nPicayune(barnard)\nQuadrate(barnard)\nVictimized(cicily)\nnot Abroach(cicily)\nPicayune(cicily)\nWondering(cicily)\nUnbaptized(cicily)\nStunned(pierson)\nVictimized(pierson)\nAbroach(pierson)\nPicayune(pierson)\nWondering(pierson)\nUnbaptized(pierson)\nnot Quadrate(pierson)\nforall x (Quadrate(x) -> Stunned(x))\nforall x (Stunned(x) -> Abroach(x))\n\nnot Unbaptized(kira)\n\nnot Unbaptized(kira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Claudius is neonatal. Claudius is organised. Dougie is woolly. Dougie is gritty. Rice is neonatal. Rice is not organised. Rice is woolly. Rice is sedentary. Rice is sanguinary. Matthias is whitened. Matthias is neonatal. Matthias is organised. Matthias is woolly. Matthias is sedentary. Matthias is sanguinary. Matthias is not gritty. All gritty things are whitened. If something is whitened then it is organised. Claudius is gritty.", "logic": "\nNeonatal(claudius)\nOrganised(claudius)\nWoolly(dougie)\nGritty(dougie)\nNeonatal(rice)\nnot Organised(rice)\nWoolly(rice)\nSedentary(rice)\nSanguinary(rice)\nWhitened(matthias)\nNeonatal(matthias)\nOrganised(matthias)\nWoolly(matthias)\nSedentary(matthias)\nSanguinary(matthias)\nnot Gritty(matthias)\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Whitened(x))\nforall x (Whitened(x) -> Organised(x))\n\nGritty(claudius)\n\nGritty(claudius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Yevette is amidship. Yevette is latish. Dorthea is extendible. Dorthea is toed. Emmalynn is amidship. Emmalynn is not latish. Emmalynn is extendible. Emmalynn is wayfaring. Emmalynn is sedulous. Emanuel is tobagonian. Emanuel is amidship. Emanuel is latish. Emanuel is extendible. Emanuel is wayfaring. Emanuel is sedulous. Emanuel is not toed. All toed things are tobagonian. If something is tobagonian then it is latish. Dorthea is not amidship.", "logic": "\nAmidship(yevette)\nLatish(yevette)\nExtendible(dorthea)\nToed(dorthea)\nAmidship(emmalynn)\nnot Latish(emmalynn)\nExtendible(emmalynn)\nWayfaring(emmalynn)\nSedulous(emmalynn)\nTobagonian(emanuel)\nAmidship(emanuel)\nLatish(emanuel)\nExtendible(emanuel)\nWayfaring(emanuel)\nSedulous(emanuel)\nnot Toed(emanuel)\nforall x (Toed(x) -> Tobagonian(x))\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Latish(x))\n\nnot Amidship(dorthea)\n\nnot Amidship(dorthea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "Thedrick is crowing. Thedrick is moslem. Alissa is crippled. Alissa is untempting. Nettie is crowing. Nettie is not moslem. Nettie is crippled. Nettie is lxxiv. Nettie is hastate. Korry is leery. Korry is crowing. Korry is moslem. Korry is crippled. Korry is lxxiv. Korry is hastate. Korry is not untempting. All untempting things are leery. If something is leery then it is moslem. Thedrick is lxxiv.", "logic": "\nCrowing(thedrick)\nMoslem(thedrick)\nCrippled(alissa)\nUntempting(alissa)\nCrowing(nettie)\nnot Moslem(nettie)\nCrippled(nettie)\nLxxiv(nettie)\nHastate(nettie)\nLeery(korry)\nCrowing(korry)\nMoslem(korry)\nCrippled(korry)\nLxxiv(korry)\nHastate(korry)\nnot Untempting(korry)\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> Leery(x))\nforall x (Leery(x) -> Moslem(x))\n\nLxxiv(thedrick)\n\nLxxiv(thedrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1886"} {"premises": "The ragnhild drip the friedrich. The ragnhild drip the andra. The ragnhild mesmerize the friedrich. The ragnhild mesmerize the andra. The ragnhild is decorous. The ragnhild is drear. The ragnhild is hypnoid. The ragnhild is squab. The ragnhild presuppose the andra. The friedrich mesmerize the ragnhild. The friedrich is hypnoid. The friedrich is inhumane. The andra mesmerize the ragnhild. The andra mesmerize the friedrich. The andra is squab. The andra presuppose the friedrich. If someone is inhumane then they chase the andra. If someone is inhumane and they chase the andra then the andra is drear. The andra presuppose the friedrich.", "logic": "\nDrip(ragnhild, friedrich)\nDrip(ragnhild, andra)\nMesmerize(ragnhild, friedrich)\nMesmerize(ragnhild, andra)\nDecorous(ragnhild)\nDrear(ragnhild)\nHypnoid(ragnhild)\nSquab(ragnhild)\nPresuppose(ragnhild, andra)\nMesmerize(friedrich, ragnhild)\nHypnoid(friedrich)\nInhumane(friedrich)\nMesmerize(andra, ragnhild)\nMesmerize(andra, friedrich)\nSquab(andra)\nPresuppose(andra, friedrich)\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Drip(x, andra))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Drip(x, andra) -> Drear(andra))\n\nPresuppose(andra, friedrich)\n\ntherefore Presuppose(andra, friedrich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The towney eradicate the hagen. The towney eradicate the claus. The towney reschedule the hagen. The towney reschedule the claus. The towney is homoerotic. The towney is dysphoric. The towney is painful. The towney is gilded. The towney tyrannize the claus. The hagen reschedule the towney. The hagen is painful. The hagen is preferred. The claus reschedule the towney. The claus reschedule the hagen. The claus is gilded. The claus tyrannize the hagen. If someone is preferred then they chase the claus. If someone is preferred and they chase the claus then the claus is dysphoric. The towney does not chase the claus.", "logic": "\nEradicate(towney, hagen)\nEradicate(towney, claus)\nReschedule(towney, hagen)\nReschedule(towney, claus)\nHomoerotic(towney)\nDysphoric(towney)\nPainful(towney)\nGilded(towney)\nTyrannize(towney, claus)\nReschedule(hagen, towney)\nPainful(hagen)\nPreferred(hagen)\nReschedule(claus, towney)\nReschedule(claus, hagen)\nGilded(claus)\nTyrannize(claus, hagen)\nforall x (Preferred(x) -> Eradicate(x, claus))\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Eradicate(x, claus) -> Dysphoric(claus))\n\nnot Eradicate(towney, claus)\n\ntherefore Eradicate(towney, claus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The osborne wedge the duane. The osborne wedge the anett. The osborne make the duane. The osborne make the anett. The osborne is carroty. The osborne is snazzy. The osborne is rigid. The osborne is robotlike. The osborne besiege the anett. The duane make the osborne. The duane is rigid. The duane is unthankful. The anett make the osborne. The anett make the duane. The anett is robotlike. The anett besiege the duane. If someone is unthankful then they chase the anett. If someone is unthankful and they chase the anett then the anett is snazzy. The duane wedge the anett.", "logic": "\nWedge(osborne, duane)\nWedge(osborne, anett)\nMake(osborne, duane)\nMake(osborne, anett)\nCarroty(osborne)\nSnazzy(osborne)\nRigid(osborne)\nRobotlike(osborne)\nBesiege(osborne, anett)\nMake(duane, osborne)\nRigid(duane)\nUnthankful(duane)\nMake(anett, osborne)\nMake(anett, duane)\nRobotlike(anett)\nBesiege(anett, duane)\nforall x (Unthankful(x) -> Wedge(x, anett))\nforall x (Unthankful(x) and Wedge(x, anett) -> Snazzy(anett))\n\nWedge(duane, anett)\n\nUnthankful(duane) and forall x (Unthankful(x) -> Wedge(x, anett)) -> therefore Wedge(duane, anett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The raye bethink the angus. The raye bethink the mehetabel. The raye limit the angus. The raye limit the mehetabel. The raye is tentacled. The raye is wheezy. The raye is vital. The raye is detectable. The raye envision the mehetabel. The angus limit the raye. The angus is vital. The angus is obliterate. The mehetabel limit the raye. The mehetabel limit the angus. The mehetabel is detectable. The mehetabel envision the angus. If someone is obliterate then they chase the mehetabel. If someone is obliterate and they chase the mehetabel then the mehetabel is wheezy. The angus does not chase the mehetabel.", "logic": "\nBethink(raye, angus)\nBethink(raye, mehetabel)\nLimit(raye, angus)\nLimit(raye, mehetabel)\nTentacled(raye)\nWheezy(raye)\nVital(raye)\nDetectable(raye)\nEnvision(raye, mehetabel)\nLimit(angus, raye)\nVital(angus)\nObliterate(angus)\nLimit(mehetabel, raye)\nLimit(mehetabel, angus)\nDetectable(mehetabel)\nEnvision(mehetabel, angus)\nforall x (Obliterate(x) -> Bethink(x, mehetabel))\nforall x (Obliterate(x) and Bethink(x, mehetabel) -> Wheezy(mehetabel))\n\nnot Bethink(angus, mehetabel)\n\nObliterate(angus) and forall x (Obliterate(x) -> Bethink(x, mehetabel)) -> therefore Bethink(angus, mehetabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The thorny localise the sibeal. The thorny localise the christy. The thorny cram the sibeal. The thorny cram the christy. The thorny is rainless. The thorny is seasick. The thorny is ebony. The thorny is xxxii. The thorny situate the christy. The sibeal cram the thorny. The sibeal is ebony. The sibeal is zigzag. The christy cram the thorny. The christy cram the sibeal. The christy is xxxii. The christy situate the sibeal. If someone is zigzag then they chase the christy. If someone is zigzag and they chase the christy then the christy is seasick. The christy is seasick.", "logic": "\nLocalise(thorny, sibeal)\nLocalise(thorny, christy)\nCram(thorny, sibeal)\nCram(thorny, christy)\nRainless(thorny)\nSeasick(thorny)\nEbony(thorny)\nXxxii(thorny)\nSituate(thorny, christy)\nCram(sibeal, thorny)\nEbony(sibeal)\nZigzag(sibeal)\nCram(christy, thorny)\nCram(christy, sibeal)\nXxxii(christy)\nSituate(christy, sibeal)\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> Localise(x, christy))\nforall x (Zigzag(x) and Localise(x, christy) -> Seasick(christy))\n\nSeasick(christy)\n\nZigzag(sibeal) and forall x (Zigzag(x) -> Localise(x, christy)) -> therefore Localise(sibeal, christy) Zigzag(sibeal) and Localise(sibeal, christy) and forall x (Zigzag(x) and Localise(x, christy) -> Seasick(christy)) -> therefore Seasick(christy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The kevin tampon the ian. The kevin tampon the juliana. The kevin doff the ian. The kevin doff the juliana. The kevin is neurogenic. The kevin is planetary. The kevin is truant. The kevin is heraldist. The kevin enamel the juliana. The ian doff the kevin. The ian is truant. The ian is moonlit. The juliana doff the kevin. The juliana doff the ian. The juliana is heraldist. The juliana enamel the ian. If someone is moonlit then they chase the juliana. If someone is moonlit and they chase the juliana then the juliana is planetary. The juliana is not planetary.", "logic": "\nTampon(kevin, ian)\nTampon(kevin, juliana)\nDoff(kevin, ian)\nDoff(kevin, juliana)\nNeurogenic(kevin)\nPlanetary(kevin)\nTruant(kevin)\nHeraldist(kevin)\nEnamel(kevin, juliana)\nDoff(ian, kevin)\nTruant(ian)\nMoonlit(ian)\nDoff(juliana, kevin)\nDoff(juliana, ian)\nHeraldist(juliana)\nEnamel(juliana, ian)\nforall x (Moonlit(x) -> Tampon(x, juliana))\nforall x (Moonlit(x) and Tampon(x, juliana) -> Planetary(juliana))\n\nnot Planetary(juliana)\n\nMoonlit(ian) and forall x (Moonlit(x) -> Tampon(x, juliana)) -> therefore Tampon(ian, juliana) Moonlit(ian) and Tampon(ian, juliana) and forall x (Moonlit(x) and Tampon(x, juliana) -> Planetary(juliana)) -> therefore Planetary(juliana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The jonell strand the aina. The jonell strand the tania. The jonell oppose the aina. The jonell oppose the tania. The jonell is separate. The jonell is perturbed. The jonell is springy. The jonell is tomboyish. The jonell desist the tania. The aina oppose the jonell. The aina is springy. The aina is steep. The tania oppose the jonell. The tania oppose the aina. The tania is tomboyish. The tania desist the aina. If someone is steep then they chase the tania. If someone is steep and they chase the tania then the tania is perturbed. The tania does not chase the tania.", "logic": "\nStrand(jonell, aina)\nStrand(jonell, tania)\nOppose(jonell, aina)\nOppose(jonell, tania)\nSeparate(jonell)\nPerturbed(jonell)\nSpringy(jonell)\nTomboyish(jonell)\nDesist(jonell, tania)\nOppose(aina, jonell)\nSpringy(aina)\nSteep(aina)\nOppose(tania, jonell)\nOppose(tania, aina)\nTomboyish(tania)\nDesist(tania, aina)\nforall x (Steep(x) -> Strand(x, tania))\nforall x (Steep(x) and Strand(x, tania) -> Perturbed(tania))\n\nnot Strand(tania, tania)\n\nforall x (Steep(x) -> Strand(x, tania)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The roana relieve the nicolas. The roana relieve the rozella. The roana etherify the nicolas. The roana etherify the rozella. The roana is pupal. The roana is idealistic. The roana is bhutanese. The roana is banned. The roana crash the rozella. The nicolas etherify the roana. The nicolas is bhutanese. The nicolas is tertian. The rozella etherify the roana. The rozella etherify the nicolas. The rozella is banned. The rozella crash the nicolas. If someone is tertian then they chase the rozella. If someone is tertian and they chase the rozella then the rozella is idealistic. The nicolas is pupal.", "logic": "\nRelieve(roana, nicolas)\nRelieve(roana, rozella)\nEtherify(roana, nicolas)\nEtherify(roana, rozella)\nPupal(roana)\nIdealistic(roana)\nBhutanese(roana)\nBanned(roana)\nCrash(roana, rozella)\nEtherify(nicolas, roana)\nBhutanese(nicolas)\nTertian(nicolas)\nEtherify(rozella, roana)\nEtherify(rozella, nicolas)\nBanned(rozella)\nCrash(rozella, nicolas)\nforall x (Tertian(x) -> Relieve(x, rozella))\nforall x (Tertian(x) and Relieve(x, rozella) -> Idealistic(rozella))\n\nPupal(nicolas)\n\nPupal(nicolas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The lurette orphan the ulrick. The lurette orphan the elvin. The lurette hump the ulrick. The lurette hump the elvin. The lurette is unwanted. The lurette is adopted. The lurette is supple. The lurette is loco. The lurette acetylate the elvin. The ulrick hump the lurette. The ulrick is supple. The ulrick is civilian. The elvin hump the lurette. The elvin hump the ulrick. The elvin is loco. The elvin acetylate the ulrick. If someone is civilian then they chase the elvin. If someone is civilian and they chase the elvin then the elvin is adopted. The ulrick does not see the ulrick.", "logic": "\nOrphan(lurette, ulrick)\nOrphan(lurette, elvin)\nHump(lurette, ulrick)\nHump(lurette, elvin)\nUnwanted(lurette)\nAdopted(lurette)\nSupple(lurette)\nLoco(lurette)\nAcetylate(lurette, elvin)\nHump(ulrick, lurette)\nSupple(ulrick)\nCivilian(ulrick)\nHump(elvin, lurette)\nHump(elvin, ulrick)\nLoco(elvin)\nAcetylate(elvin, ulrick)\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Orphan(x, elvin))\nforall x (Civilian(x) and Orphan(x, elvin) -> Adopted(elvin))\n\nnot Acetylate(ulrick, ulrick)\n\nnot Acetylate(ulrick, ulrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The sheffie invigorate the lorrin. The sheffie invigorate the pollyanna. The sheffie mail the lorrin. The sheffie mail the pollyanna. The sheffie is abounding. The sheffie is oratorical. The sheffie is inner. The sheffie is poky. The sheffie maneuver the pollyanna. The lorrin mail the sheffie. The lorrin is inner. The lorrin is squinty. The pollyanna mail the sheffie. The pollyanna mail the lorrin. The pollyanna is poky. The pollyanna maneuver the lorrin. If someone is squinty then they chase the pollyanna. If someone is squinty and they chase the pollyanna then the pollyanna is oratorical. The lorrin maneuver the sheffie.", "logic": "\nInvigorate(sheffie, lorrin)\nInvigorate(sheffie, pollyanna)\nMail(sheffie, lorrin)\nMail(sheffie, pollyanna)\nAbounding(sheffie)\nOratorical(sheffie)\nInner(sheffie)\nPoky(sheffie)\nManeuver(sheffie, pollyanna)\nMail(lorrin, sheffie)\nInner(lorrin)\nSquinty(lorrin)\nMail(pollyanna, sheffie)\nMail(pollyanna, lorrin)\nPoky(pollyanna)\nManeuver(pollyanna, lorrin)\nforall x (Squinty(x) -> Invigorate(x, pollyanna))\nforall x (Squinty(x) and Invigorate(x, pollyanna) -> Oratorical(pollyanna))\n\nManeuver(lorrin, sheffie)\n\nManeuver(lorrin, sheffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The eugenia capture the davy. The eugenia capture the ximenes. The eugenia goffer the davy. The eugenia goffer the ximenes. The eugenia is allargando. The eugenia is unplanned. The eugenia is expurgated. The eugenia is hifalutin. The eugenia refute the ximenes. The davy goffer the eugenia. The davy is expurgated. The davy is bowery. The ximenes goffer the eugenia. The ximenes goffer the davy. The ximenes is hifalutin. The ximenes refute the davy. If someone is bowery then they chase the ximenes. If someone is bowery and they chase the ximenes then the ximenes is unplanned. The davy does not eat the ximenes.", "logic": "\nCapture(eugenia, davy)\nCapture(eugenia, ximenes)\nGoffer(eugenia, davy)\nGoffer(eugenia, ximenes)\nAllargando(eugenia)\nUnplanned(eugenia)\nExpurgated(eugenia)\nHifalutin(eugenia)\nRefute(eugenia, ximenes)\nGoffer(davy, eugenia)\nExpurgated(davy)\nBowery(davy)\nGoffer(ximenes, eugenia)\nGoffer(ximenes, davy)\nHifalutin(ximenes)\nRefute(ximenes, davy)\nforall x (Bowery(x) -> Capture(x, ximenes))\nforall x (Bowery(x) and Capture(x, ximenes) -> Unplanned(ximenes))\n\nnot Goffer(davy, ximenes)\n\nnot Goffer(davy, ximenes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "The marie tram the dyna. The marie tram the charles. The marie reforge the dyna. The marie reforge the charles. The marie is seeded. The marie is juxtaposed. The marie is pictorial. The marie is chylific. The marie disembody the charles. The dyna reforge the marie. The dyna is pictorial. The dyna is cocksure. The charles reforge the marie. The charles reforge the dyna. The charles is chylific. The charles disembody the dyna. If someone is cocksure then they chase the charles. If someone is cocksure and they chase the charles then the charles is juxtaposed. The charles tram the dyna.", "logic": "\nTram(marie, dyna)\nTram(marie, charles)\nReforge(marie, dyna)\nReforge(marie, charles)\nSeeded(marie)\nJuxtaposed(marie)\nPictorial(marie)\nChylific(marie)\nDisembody(marie, charles)\nReforge(dyna, marie)\nPictorial(dyna)\nCocksure(dyna)\nReforge(charles, marie)\nReforge(charles, dyna)\nChylific(charles)\nDisembody(charles, dyna)\nforall x (Cocksure(x) -> Tram(x, charles))\nforall x (Cocksure(x) and Tram(x, charles) -> Juxtaposed(charles))\n\nTram(charles, dyna)\n\nTram(charles, dyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-330"} {"premises": "Charis is center. Charis is asymptotic. Charis is not skinnerian. Raymond is redolent. Raymond is dreamlike. Raymond is dreamless. Raymond is skinnerian. Lotti is not redolent. Lotti is not center. Lotti is dreamlike. Lotti is dreamless. Lotti is skinnerian. Tia is redolent. Tia is center. Tia is brutal. If someone is dreamless and dreamlike then they are brutal. Quiet people are asymptotic. Tia is brutal.", "logic": "\nCenter(charis)\nAsymptotic(charis)\nnot Skinnerian(charis)\nRedolent(raymond)\nDreamlike(raymond)\nDreamless(raymond)\nSkinnerian(raymond)\nnot Redolent(lotti)\nnot Center(lotti)\nDreamlike(lotti)\nDreamless(lotti)\nSkinnerian(lotti)\nRedolent(tia)\nCenter(tia)\nBrutal(tia)\nforall x (Dreamless(x) and Dreamlike(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Asymptotic(x))\n\nBrutal(tia)\n\ntherefore Brutal(tia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Claresta is forbidding. Claresta is netlike. Claresta is not entrenched. Ahmed is piquant. Ahmed is bipartite. Ahmed is unstained. Ahmed is entrenched. Luke is not piquant. Luke is not forbidding. Luke is bipartite. Luke is unstained. Luke is entrenched. Matelda is piquant. Matelda is forbidding. Matelda is infrahuman. If someone is unstained and bipartite then they are infrahuman. Quiet people are netlike. Matelda is not piquant.", "logic": "\nForbidding(claresta)\nNetlike(claresta)\nnot Entrenched(claresta)\nPiquant(ahmed)\nBipartite(ahmed)\nUnstained(ahmed)\nEntrenched(ahmed)\nnot Piquant(luke)\nnot Forbidding(luke)\nBipartite(luke)\nUnstained(luke)\nEntrenched(luke)\nPiquant(matelda)\nForbidding(matelda)\nInfrahuman(matelda)\nforall x (Unstained(x) and Bipartite(x) -> Infrahuman(x))\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Netlike(x))\n\nnot Piquant(matelda)\n\ntherefore Piquant(matelda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Ardra is uneducated. Ardra is wrongful. Ardra is not remediable. Manya is ascendible. Manya is mirrorlike. Manya is spavined. Manya is remediable. Jimmy is not ascendible. Jimmy is not uneducated. Jimmy is mirrorlike. Jimmy is spavined. Jimmy is remediable. Oleg is ascendible. Oleg is uneducated. Oleg is teachable. If someone is spavined and mirrorlike then they are teachable. Quiet people are wrongful. Oleg is wrongful.", "logic": "\nUneducated(ardra)\nWrongful(ardra)\nnot Remediable(ardra)\nAscendible(manya)\nMirrorlike(manya)\nSpavined(manya)\nRemediable(manya)\nnot Ascendible(jimmy)\nnot Uneducated(jimmy)\nMirrorlike(jimmy)\nSpavined(jimmy)\nRemediable(jimmy)\nAscendible(oleg)\nUneducated(oleg)\nTeachable(oleg)\nforall x (Spavined(x) and Mirrorlike(x) -> Teachable(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) -> Wrongful(x))\n\nWrongful(oleg)\n\nTeachable(oleg) and forall x (Teachable(x) -> Wrongful(x)) -> therefore Wrongful(oleg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Erena is relieved. Erena is nonporous. Erena is not meddling. Donetta is costal. Donetta is backstair. Donetta is arciform. Donetta is meddling. Rockwell is not costal. Rockwell is not relieved. Rockwell is backstair. Rockwell is arciform. Rockwell is meddling. Mitzi is costal. Mitzi is relieved. Mitzi is lonely. If someone is arciform and backstair then they are lonely. Quiet people are nonporous. Rockwell is not lonely.", "logic": "\nRelieved(erena)\nNonporous(erena)\nnot Meddling(erena)\nCostal(donetta)\nBackstair(donetta)\nArciform(donetta)\nMeddling(donetta)\nnot Costal(rockwell)\nnot Relieved(rockwell)\nBackstair(rockwell)\nArciform(rockwell)\nMeddling(rockwell)\nCostal(mitzi)\nRelieved(mitzi)\nLonely(mitzi)\nforall x (Arciform(x) and Backstair(x) -> Lonely(x))\nforall x (Lonely(x) -> Nonporous(x))\n\nnot Lonely(rockwell)\n\nArciform(rockwell) and Backstair(rockwell) and forall x (Arciform(x) and Backstair(x) -> Lonely(x)) -> therefore Lonely(rockwell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Barbra is unsighted. Barbra is insatiate. Barbra is not scentless. Ronni is bilobate. Ronni is undreamt. Ronni is agamic. Ronni is scentless. Minetta is not bilobate. Minetta is not unsighted. Minetta is undreamt. Minetta is agamic. Minetta is scentless. Patel is bilobate. Patel is unsighted. Patel is semiformal. If someone is agamic and undreamt then they are semiformal. Quiet people are insatiate. Minetta is insatiate.", "logic": "\nUnsighted(barbra)\nInsatiate(barbra)\nnot Scentless(barbra)\nBilobate(ronni)\nUndreamt(ronni)\nAgamic(ronni)\nScentless(ronni)\nnot Bilobate(minetta)\nnot Unsighted(minetta)\nUndreamt(minetta)\nAgamic(minetta)\nScentless(minetta)\nBilobate(patel)\nUnsighted(patel)\nSemiformal(patel)\nforall x (Agamic(x) and Undreamt(x) -> Semiformal(x))\nforall x (Semiformal(x) -> Insatiate(x))\n\nInsatiate(minetta)\n\nAgamic(minetta) and Undreamt(minetta) and forall x (Agamic(x) and Undreamt(x) -> Semiformal(x)) -> therefore Semiformal(minetta) Semiformal(minetta) and forall x (Semiformal(x) -> Insatiate(x)) -> therefore Insatiate(minetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Gilbert is raucous. Gilbert is possessed. Gilbert is not brachiate. Jeramie is maxillary. Jeramie is hifalutin. Jeramie is diocesan. Jeramie is brachiate. Zarla is not maxillary. Zarla is not raucous. Zarla is hifalutin. Zarla is diocesan. Zarla is brachiate. Anton is maxillary. Anton is raucous. Anton is hypertonic. If someone is diocesan and hifalutin then they are hypertonic. Quiet people are possessed. Zarla is not possessed.", "logic": "\nRaucous(gilbert)\nPossessed(gilbert)\nnot Brachiate(gilbert)\nMaxillary(jeramie)\nHifalutin(jeramie)\nDiocesan(jeramie)\nBrachiate(jeramie)\nnot Maxillary(zarla)\nnot Raucous(zarla)\nHifalutin(zarla)\nDiocesan(zarla)\nBrachiate(zarla)\nMaxillary(anton)\nRaucous(anton)\nHypertonic(anton)\nforall x (Diocesan(x) and Hifalutin(x) -> Hypertonic(x))\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Possessed(x))\n\nnot Possessed(zarla)\n\nDiocesan(zarla) and Hifalutin(zarla) and forall x (Diocesan(x) and Hifalutin(x) -> Hypertonic(x)) -> therefore Hypertonic(zarla) Hypertonic(zarla) and forall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Possessed(x)) -> therefore Possessed(zarla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Merrily is cramped. Merrily is inebriated. Merrily is not imposed. Harrold is unifying. Harrold is serflike. Harrold is grouped. Harrold is imposed. Hamil is not unifying. Hamil is not cramped. Hamil is serflike. Hamil is grouped. Hamil is imposed. Chas is unifying. Chas is cramped. Chas is acerbic. If someone is grouped and serflike then they are acerbic. Quiet people are inebriated. Merrily is not acerbic.", "logic": "\nCramped(merrily)\nInebriated(merrily)\nnot Imposed(merrily)\nUnifying(harrold)\nSerflike(harrold)\nGrouped(harrold)\nImposed(harrold)\nnot Unifying(hamil)\nnot Cramped(hamil)\nSerflike(hamil)\nGrouped(hamil)\nImposed(hamil)\nUnifying(chas)\nCramped(chas)\nAcerbic(chas)\nforall x (Grouped(x) and Serflike(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) -> Inebriated(x))\n\nnot Acerbic(merrily)\n\nforall x (Grouped(x) and Serflike(x) -> Acerbic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Nicole is nigerien. Nicole is acuate. Nicole is not consonant. Misha is pudgy. Misha is civic. Misha is probatory. Misha is consonant. Minnie is not pudgy. Minnie is not nigerien. Minnie is civic. Minnie is probatory. Minnie is consonant. Tove is pudgy. Tove is nigerien. Tove is toupeed. If someone is probatory and civic then they are toupeed. Quiet people are acuate. Nicole is civic.", "logic": "\nNigerien(nicole)\nAcuate(nicole)\nnot Consonant(nicole)\nPudgy(misha)\nCivic(misha)\nProbatory(misha)\nConsonant(misha)\nnot Pudgy(minnie)\nnot Nigerien(minnie)\nCivic(minnie)\nProbatory(minnie)\nConsonant(minnie)\nPudgy(tove)\nNigerien(tove)\nToupeed(tove)\nforall x (Probatory(x) and Civic(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Acuate(x))\n\nCivic(nicole)\n\nCivic(nicole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Tallie is unrimed. Tallie is emblematic. Tallie is not gasified. Norean is propellant. Norean is utter. Norean is demolished. Norean is gasified. Hartley is not propellant. Hartley is not unrimed. Hartley is utter. Hartley is demolished. Hartley is gasified. Phaidra is propellant. Phaidra is unrimed. Phaidra is nomothetic. If someone is demolished and utter then they are nomothetic. Quiet people are emblematic. Tallie is not propellant.", "logic": "\nUnrimed(tallie)\nEmblematic(tallie)\nnot Gasified(tallie)\nPropellant(norean)\nUtter(norean)\nDemolished(norean)\nGasified(norean)\nnot Propellant(hartley)\nnot Unrimed(hartley)\nUtter(hartley)\nDemolished(hartley)\nGasified(hartley)\nPropellant(phaidra)\nUnrimed(phaidra)\nNomothetic(phaidra)\nforall x (Demolished(x) and Utter(x) -> Nomothetic(x))\nforall x (Nomothetic(x) -> Emblematic(x))\n\nnot Propellant(tallie)\n\nnot Propellant(tallie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Inesita is distressed. Inesita is returnable. Inesita is not jerkwater. Gwenny is doctrinal. Gwenny is wartlike. Gwenny is beery. Gwenny is jerkwater. Ranna is not doctrinal. Ranna is not distressed. Ranna is wartlike. Ranna is beery. Ranna is jerkwater. Tabbitha is doctrinal. Tabbitha is distressed. Tabbitha is catalytic. If someone is beery and wartlike then they are catalytic. Quiet people are returnable. Tabbitha is jerkwater.", "logic": "\nDistressed(inesita)\nReturnable(inesita)\nnot Jerkwater(inesita)\nDoctrinal(gwenny)\nWartlike(gwenny)\nBeery(gwenny)\nJerkwater(gwenny)\nnot Doctrinal(ranna)\nnot Distressed(ranna)\nWartlike(ranna)\nBeery(ranna)\nJerkwater(ranna)\nDoctrinal(tabbitha)\nDistressed(tabbitha)\nCatalytic(tabbitha)\nforall x (Beery(x) and Wartlike(x) -> Catalytic(x))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) -> Returnable(x))\n\nJerkwater(tabbitha)\n\nJerkwater(tabbitha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Freda is alterable. Freda is rising. Freda is not reptilian. Doloritas is redeemed. Doloritas is octagonal. Doloritas is fortissimo. Doloritas is reptilian. Walther is not redeemed. Walther is not alterable. Walther is octagonal. Walther is fortissimo. Walther is reptilian. Rhodia is redeemed. Rhodia is alterable. Rhodia is fulminant. If someone is fortissimo and octagonal then they are fulminant. Quiet people are rising. Doloritas is not alterable.", "logic": "\nAlterable(freda)\nRising(freda)\nnot Reptilian(freda)\nRedeemed(doloritas)\nOctagonal(doloritas)\nFortissimo(doloritas)\nReptilian(doloritas)\nnot Redeemed(walther)\nnot Alterable(walther)\nOctagonal(walther)\nFortissimo(walther)\nReptilian(walther)\nRedeemed(rhodia)\nAlterable(rhodia)\nFulminant(rhodia)\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) and Octagonal(x) -> Fulminant(x))\nforall x (Fulminant(x) -> Rising(x))\n\nnot Alterable(doloritas)\n\nnot Alterable(doloritas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Celestine is aerophilic. Celestine is calm. Celestine is not marginal. Cristen is lebanese. Cristen is worried. Cristen is ottoman. Cristen is marginal. Cobbie is not lebanese. Cobbie is not aerophilic. Cobbie is worried. Cobbie is ottoman. Cobbie is marginal. Madalena is lebanese. Madalena is aerophilic. Madalena is greyed. If someone is ottoman and worried then they are greyed. Quiet people are calm. Madalena is ottoman.", "logic": "\nAerophilic(celestine)\nCalm(celestine)\nnot Marginal(celestine)\nLebanese(cristen)\nWorried(cristen)\nOttoman(cristen)\nMarginal(cristen)\nnot Lebanese(cobbie)\nnot Aerophilic(cobbie)\nWorried(cobbie)\nOttoman(cobbie)\nMarginal(cobbie)\nLebanese(madalena)\nAerophilic(madalena)\nGreyed(madalena)\nforall x (Ottoman(x) and Worried(x) -> Greyed(x))\nforall x (Greyed(x) -> Calm(x))\n\nOttoman(madalena)\n\nOttoman(madalena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "The raphaela is itchy. The raphaela whang the analise. The vena fasten the raphaela. The analise acquire the raphaela. The analise is fossilised. The analise whang the vena. The analise fasten the vena. If someone acquire the raphaela then they are not russian. If someone fasten the vena and the vena does not need the analise then the vena is fahrenheit. If someone is itchy then they eat the raphaela. The raphaela whang the analise.", "logic": "\nItchy(raphaela)\nWhang(raphaela, analise)\nFasten(vena, raphaela)\nAcquire(analise, raphaela)\nFossilised(analise)\nWhang(analise, vena)\nFasten(analise, vena)\nforall x (Acquire(x, raphaela) -> not Russian(x))\nforall x (Fasten(x, vena) and not Whang(vena, analise) -> Fahrenheit(vena))\nforall x (Itchy(x) -> Acquire(x, raphaela))\n\nWhang(raphaela, analise)\n\ntherefore Whang(raphaela, analise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The trevar is more. The trevar asphalt the anabella. The carlota engrave the trevar. The anabella exchange the trevar. The anabella is orthogonal. The anabella asphalt the carlota. The anabella engrave the carlota. If someone exchange the trevar then they are not unheeded. If someone engrave the carlota and the carlota does not need the anabella then the carlota is flagellate. If someone is more then they eat the trevar. The anabella does not eat the trevar.", "logic": "\nMore(trevar)\nAsphalt(trevar, anabella)\nEngrave(carlota, trevar)\nExchange(anabella, trevar)\nOrthogonal(anabella)\nAsphalt(anabella, carlota)\nEngrave(anabella, carlota)\nforall x (Exchange(x, trevar) -> not Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Engrave(x, carlota) and not Asphalt(carlota, anabella) -> Flagellate(carlota))\nforall x (More(x) -> Exchange(x, trevar))\n\nnot Exchange(anabella, trevar)\n\ntherefore Exchange(anabella, trevar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The charlton is special. The charlton route the cameron. The doris potter the charlton. The cameron deprave the charlton. The cameron is bohemian. The cameron route the doris. The cameron potter the doris. If someone deprave the charlton then they are not treelike. If someone potter the doris and the doris does not need the cameron then the doris is glum. If someone is special then they eat the charlton. The cameron is not treelike.", "logic": "\nSpecial(charlton)\nRoute(charlton, cameron)\nPotter(doris, charlton)\nDeprave(cameron, charlton)\nBohemian(cameron)\nRoute(cameron, doris)\nPotter(cameron, doris)\nforall x (Deprave(x, charlton) -> not Treelike(x))\nforall x (Potter(x, doris) and not Route(doris, cameron) -> Glum(doris))\nforall x (Special(x) -> Deprave(x, charlton))\n\nnot Treelike(cameron)\n\nDeprave(cameron, charlton) and forall x (Deprave(x, charlton) -> not Treelike(x)) -> therefore not Treelike(cameron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The vick is unstinted. The vick pauperize the felipe. The uriah contour the vick. The felipe enrobe the vick. The felipe is brusk. The felipe pauperize the uriah. The felipe contour the uriah. If someone enrobe the vick then they are not tinny. If someone contour the uriah and the uriah does not need the felipe then the uriah is expandable. If someone is unstinted then they eat the vick. The vick does not eat the vick.", "logic": "\nUnstinted(vick)\nPauperize(vick, felipe)\nContour(uriah, vick)\nEnrobe(felipe, vick)\nBrusk(felipe)\nPauperize(felipe, uriah)\nContour(felipe, uriah)\nforall x (Enrobe(x, vick) -> not Tinny(x))\nforall x (Contour(x, uriah) and not Pauperize(uriah, felipe) -> Expandable(uriah))\nforall x (Unstinted(x) -> Enrobe(x, vick))\n\nnot Enrobe(vick, vick)\n\nUnstinted(vick) and forall x (Unstinted(x) -> Enrobe(x, vick)) -> therefore Enrobe(vick, vick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The jacklin is yogic. The jacklin barbarize the mikel. The shirline repay the jacklin. The mikel shlep the jacklin. The mikel is rhizoidal. The mikel barbarize the shirline. The mikel repay the shirline. If someone shlep the jacklin then they are not immoveable. If someone repay the shirline and the shirline does not need the mikel then the shirline is carbuncled. If someone is yogic then they eat the jacklin. The jacklin is not immoveable.", "logic": "\nYogic(jacklin)\nBarbarize(jacklin, mikel)\nRepay(shirline, jacklin)\nShlep(mikel, jacklin)\nRhizoidal(mikel)\nBarbarize(mikel, shirline)\nRepay(mikel, shirline)\nforall x (Shlep(x, jacklin) -> not Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Repay(x, shirline) and not Barbarize(shirline, mikel) -> Carbuncled(shirline))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Shlep(x, jacklin))\n\nnot Immoveable(jacklin)\n\nYogic(jacklin) and forall x (Yogic(x) -> Shlep(x, jacklin)) -> therefore Shlep(jacklin, jacklin) Shlep(jacklin, jacklin) and forall x (Shlep(x, jacklin) -> not Immoveable(x)) -> therefore not Immoveable(jacklin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The tish is outback. The tish roughen the katine. The giordano jest the tish. The katine beguile the tish. The katine is adducent. The katine roughen the giordano. The katine jest the giordano. If someone beguile the tish then they are not animal. If someone jest the giordano and the giordano does not need the katine then the giordano is lxxxvii. If someone is outback then they eat the tish. The tish is animal.", "logic": "\nOutback(tish)\nRoughen(tish, katine)\nJest(giordano, tish)\nBeguile(katine, tish)\nAdducent(katine)\nRoughen(katine, giordano)\nJest(katine, giordano)\nforall x (Beguile(x, tish) -> not Animal(x))\nforall x (Jest(x, giordano) and not Roughen(giordano, katine) -> Lxxxvii(giordano))\nforall x (Outback(x) -> Beguile(x, tish))\n\nAnimal(tish)\n\nOutback(tish) and forall x (Outback(x) -> Beguile(x, tish)) -> therefore Beguile(tish, tish) Beguile(tish, tish) and forall x (Beguile(x, tish) -> not Animal(x)) -> therefore not Animal(tish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The beilul is unheaded. The beilul near the christina. The barnaby unburden the beilul. The christina bonk the beilul. The christina is rhymeless. The christina near the barnaby. The christina unburden the barnaby. If someone bonk the beilul then they are not inguinal. If someone unburden the barnaby and the barnaby does not need the christina then the barnaby is freaky. If someone is unheaded then they eat the beilul. The barnaby does not eat the beilul.", "logic": "\nUnheaded(beilul)\nNear(beilul, christina)\nUnburden(barnaby, beilul)\nBonk(christina, beilul)\nRhymeless(christina)\nNear(christina, barnaby)\nUnburden(christina, barnaby)\nforall x (Bonk(x, beilul) -> not Inguinal(x))\nforall x (Unburden(x, barnaby) and not Near(barnaby, christina) -> Freaky(barnaby))\nforall x (Unheaded(x) -> Bonk(x, beilul))\n\nnot Bonk(barnaby, beilul)\n\nforall x (Unheaded(x) -> Bonk(x, beilul)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The felecia is heathlike. The felecia dandle the obadias. The ardyce dragoon the felecia. The obadias airmail the felecia. The obadias is oblivious. The obadias dandle the ardyce. The obadias dragoon the ardyce. If someone airmail the felecia then they are not epilithic. If someone dragoon the ardyce and the ardyce does not need the obadias then the ardyce is amnestic. If someone is heathlike then they eat the felecia. The ardyce is amnestic.", "logic": "\nHeathlike(felecia)\nDandle(felecia, obadias)\nDragoon(ardyce, felecia)\nAirmail(obadias, felecia)\nOblivious(obadias)\nDandle(obadias, ardyce)\nDragoon(obadias, ardyce)\nforall x (Airmail(x, felecia) -> not Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, ardyce) and not Dandle(ardyce, obadias) -> Amnestic(ardyce))\nforall x (Heathlike(x) -> Airmail(x, felecia))\n\nAmnestic(ardyce)\n\nforall x (Dragoon(x, ardyce) and not Dandle(ardyce, obadias) -> Amnestic(ardyce)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The merrick is holozoic. The merrick shovel the virgina. The mmarianne club the merrick. The virgina tampon the merrick. The virgina is grubby. The virgina shovel the mmarianne. The virgina club the mmarianne. If someone tampon the merrick then they are not gingival. If someone club the mmarianne and the mmarianne does not need the virgina then the mmarianne is acritical. If someone is holozoic then they eat the merrick. The merrick does not visit the virgina.", "logic": "\nHolozoic(merrick)\nShovel(merrick, virgina)\nClub(mmarianne, merrick)\nTampon(virgina, merrick)\nGrubby(virgina)\nShovel(virgina, mmarianne)\nClub(virgina, mmarianne)\nforall x (Tampon(x, merrick) -> not Gingival(x))\nforall x (Club(x, mmarianne) and not Shovel(mmarianne, virgina) -> Acritical(mmarianne))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Tampon(x, merrick))\n\nnot Club(merrick, virgina)\n\nnot Club(merrick, virgina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The poppy is effected. The poppy full the hanson. The lincoln shmoose the poppy. The hanson cite the poppy. The hanson is germy. The hanson full the lincoln. The hanson shmoose the lincoln. If someone cite the poppy then they are not playable. If someone shmoose the lincoln and the lincoln does not need the hanson then the lincoln is granted. If someone is effected then they eat the poppy. The hanson cite the hanson.", "logic": "\nEffected(poppy)\nFull(poppy, hanson)\nShmoose(lincoln, poppy)\nCite(hanson, poppy)\nGermy(hanson)\nFull(hanson, lincoln)\nShmoose(hanson, lincoln)\nforall x (Cite(x, poppy) -> not Playable(x))\nforall x (Shmoose(x, lincoln) and not Full(lincoln, hanson) -> Granted(lincoln))\nforall x (Effected(x) -> Cite(x, poppy))\n\nCite(hanson, hanson)\n\nCite(hanson, hanson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The adelina is akimbo. The adelina monger the carmella. The matthus manicure the adelina. The carmella aquatint the adelina. The carmella is loved. The carmella monger the matthus. The carmella manicure the matthus. If someone aquatint the adelina then they are not chinked. If someone manicure the matthus and the matthus does not need the carmella then the matthus is cuspated. If someone is akimbo then they eat the adelina. The carmella does not need the carmella.", "logic": "\nAkimbo(adelina)\nMonger(adelina, carmella)\nManicure(matthus, adelina)\nAquatint(carmella, adelina)\nLoved(carmella)\nMonger(carmella, matthus)\nManicure(carmella, matthus)\nforall x (Aquatint(x, adelina) -> not Chinked(x))\nforall x (Manicure(x, matthus) and not Monger(matthus, carmella) -> Cuspated(matthus))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Aquatint(x, adelina))\n\nnot Monger(carmella, carmella)\n\nnot Monger(carmella, carmella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The forster is anaglyptic. The forster sulk the barnabe. The steffane pall the forster. The barnabe experiment the forster. The barnabe is unploughed. The barnabe sulk the steffane. The barnabe pall the steffane. If someone experiment the forster then they are not agonized. If someone pall the steffane and the steffane does not need the barnabe then the steffane is cetaceous. If someone is anaglyptic then they eat the forster. The forster pall the forster.", "logic": "\nAnaglyptic(forster)\nSulk(forster, barnabe)\nPall(steffane, forster)\nExperiment(barnabe, forster)\nUnploughed(barnabe)\nSulk(barnabe, steffane)\nPall(barnabe, steffane)\nforall x (Experiment(x, forster) -> not Agonized(x))\nforall x (Pall(x, steffane) and not Sulk(steffane, barnabe) -> Cetaceous(steffane))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Experiment(x, forster))\n\nPall(forster, forster)\n\nPall(forster, forster) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "Darin is askant. Darin is banal. Darin is civilized. Darin is unseeyn. Darin is not world. Darin is fungal. Nova is banal. Nova is civilized. Dee is askant. Dee is not neuronic. Dee is not civilized. Dee is fungal. If something is unseeyn then it is not world. If something is neuronic then it is unseeyn. Smart, neuronic things are unseeyn. If something is civilized then it is not neuronic. If something is neuronic then it is not askant. If Nova is not neuronic then Nova is not askant. Darin is banal.", "logic": "\nAskant(darin)\nBanal(darin)\nCivilized(darin)\nUnseeyn(darin)\nnot World(darin)\nFungal(darin)\nBanal(nova)\nCivilized(nova)\nAskant(dee)\nnot Neuronic(dee)\nnot Civilized(dee)\nFungal(dee)\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) -> not World(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (World(x) and Neuronic(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Civilized(x) -> not Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> not Askant(x))\nnot Neuronic(nova) -> not Askant(nova)\n\nBanal(darin)\n\ntherefore Banal(darin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Amber is fair. Amber is cyan. Amber is downbound. Amber is scrotal. Amber is not arawakan. Amber is matured. Renee is cyan. Renee is downbound. Nessi is fair. Nessi is not squiffy. Nessi is not downbound. Nessi is matured. If something is scrotal then it is not arawakan. If something is squiffy then it is scrotal. Smart, squiffy things are scrotal. If something is downbound then it is not squiffy. If something is squiffy then it is not fair. If Renee is not squiffy then Renee is not fair. Nessi is not matured.", "logic": "\nFair(amber)\nCyan(amber)\nDownbound(amber)\nScrotal(amber)\nnot Arawakan(amber)\nMatured(amber)\nCyan(renee)\nDownbound(renee)\nFair(nessi)\nnot Squiffy(nessi)\nnot Downbound(nessi)\nMatured(nessi)\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> not Arawakan(x))\nforall x (Squiffy(x) -> Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) and Squiffy(x) -> Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Downbound(x) -> not Squiffy(x))\nforall x (Squiffy(x) -> not Fair(x))\nnot Squiffy(renee) -> not Fair(renee)\n\nnot Matured(nessi)\n\ntherefore Matured(nessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Fionnula is adjustable. Fionnula is tragical. Fionnula is relaxing. Fionnula is tattling. Fionnula is not cuban. Fionnula is scythian. Darsey is tragical. Darsey is relaxing. Amandy is adjustable. Amandy is not geological. Amandy is not relaxing. Amandy is scythian. If something is tattling then it is not cuban. If something is geological then it is tattling. Smart, geological things are tattling. If something is relaxing then it is not geological. If something is geological then it is not adjustable. If Darsey is not geological then Darsey is not adjustable. Fionnula is not geological.", "logic": "\nAdjustable(fionnula)\nTragical(fionnula)\nRelaxing(fionnula)\nTattling(fionnula)\nnot Cuban(fionnula)\nScythian(fionnula)\nTragical(darsey)\nRelaxing(darsey)\nAdjustable(amandy)\nnot Geological(amandy)\nnot Relaxing(amandy)\nScythian(amandy)\nforall x (Tattling(x) -> not Cuban(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Geological(x) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Relaxing(x) -> not Geological(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) -> not Adjustable(x))\nnot Geological(darsey) -> not Adjustable(darsey)\n\nnot Geological(fionnula)\n\nRelaxing(fionnula) and forall x (Relaxing(x) -> not Geological(x)) -> therefore not Geological(fionnula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Kaspar is surrogate. Kaspar is prize. Kaspar is exotic. Kaspar is immotile. Kaspar is not hydric. Kaspar is crusted. Verile is prize. Verile is exotic. Fae is surrogate. Fae is not vermiform. Fae is not exotic. Fae is crusted. If something is immotile then it is not hydric. If something is vermiform then it is immotile. Smart, vermiform things are immotile. If something is exotic then it is not vermiform. If something is vermiform then it is not surrogate. If Verile is not vermiform then Verile is not surrogate. Verile is vermiform.", "logic": "\nSurrogate(kaspar)\nPrize(kaspar)\nExotic(kaspar)\nImmotile(kaspar)\nnot Hydric(kaspar)\nCrusted(kaspar)\nPrize(verile)\nExotic(verile)\nSurrogate(fae)\nnot Vermiform(fae)\nnot Exotic(fae)\nCrusted(fae)\nforall x (Immotile(x) -> not Hydric(x))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Immotile(x))\nforall x (Hydric(x) and Vermiform(x) -> Immotile(x))\nforall x (Exotic(x) -> not Vermiform(x))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> not Surrogate(x))\nnot Vermiform(verile) -> not Surrogate(verile)\n\nVermiform(verile)\n\nExotic(verile) and forall x (Exotic(x) -> not Vermiform(x)) -> therefore not Vermiform(verile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Filide is soulful. Filide is defective. Filide is duncish. Filide is bodied. Filide is not vendable. Filide is visualized. Kimberlee is defective. Kimberlee is duncish. Jaquith is soulful. Jaquith is not amuck. Jaquith is not duncish. Jaquith is visualized. If something is bodied then it is not vendable. If something is amuck then it is bodied. Smart, amuck things are bodied. If something is duncish then it is not amuck. If something is amuck then it is not soulful. If Kimberlee is not amuck then Kimberlee is not soulful. Kimberlee is not soulful.", "logic": "\nSoulful(filide)\nDefective(filide)\nDuncish(filide)\nBodied(filide)\nnot Vendable(filide)\nVisualized(filide)\nDefective(kimberlee)\nDuncish(kimberlee)\nSoulful(jaquith)\nnot Amuck(jaquith)\nnot Duncish(jaquith)\nVisualized(jaquith)\nforall x (Bodied(x) -> not Vendable(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Vendable(x) and Amuck(x) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> not Amuck(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) -> not Soulful(x))\nnot Amuck(kimberlee) -> not Soulful(kimberlee)\n\nnot Soulful(kimberlee)\n\nDuncish(kimberlee) and forall x (Duncish(x) -> not Amuck(x)) -> therefore not Amuck(kimberlee) not Amuck(kimberlee) and not Amuck(kimberlee) -> not Soulful(kimberlee) -> therefore not Soulful(kimberlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Ethyl is former. Ethyl is groggy. Ethyl is balmy. Ethyl is syncarpous. Ethyl is not tannic. Ethyl is sixtieth. Sigmund is groggy. Sigmund is balmy. Adoree is former. Adoree is not inducive. Adoree is not balmy. Adoree is sixtieth. If something is syncarpous then it is not tannic. If something is inducive then it is syncarpous. Smart, inducive things are syncarpous. If something is balmy then it is not inducive. If something is inducive then it is not former. If Sigmund is not inducive then Sigmund is not former. Sigmund is former.", "logic": "\nFormer(ethyl)\nGroggy(ethyl)\nBalmy(ethyl)\nSyncarpous(ethyl)\nnot Tannic(ethyl)\nSixtieth(ethyl)\nGroggy(sigmund)\nBalmy(sigmund)\nFormer(adoree)\nnot Inducive(adoree)\nnot Balmy(adoree)\nSixtieth(adoree)\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) -> not Tannic(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Tannic(x) and Inducive(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Balmy(x) -> not Inducive(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) -> not Former(x))\nnot Inducive(sigmund) -> not Former(sigmund)\n\nFormer(sigmund)\n\nBalmy(sigmund) and forall x (Balmy(x) -> not Inducive(x)) -> therefore not Inducive(sigmund) not Inducive(sigmund) and not Inducive(sigmund) -> not Former(sigmund) -> therefore not Former(sigmund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Ulrick is uninspired. Ulrick is sterile. Ulrick is intuitive. Ulrick is false. Ulrick is not sneak. Ulrick is unimpaired. Albert is sterile. Albert is intuitive. Ephrem is uninspired. Ephrem is not serrated. Ephrem is not intuitive. Ephrem is unimpaired. If something is false then it is not sneak. If something is serrated then it is false. Smart, serrated things are false. If something is intuitive then it is not serrated. If something is serrated then it is not uninspired. If Albert is not serrated then Albert is not uninspired. Albert is not false.", "logic": "\nUninspired(ulrick)\nSterile(ulrick)\nIntuitive(ulrick)\nFalse(ulrick)\nnot Sneak(ulrick)\nUnimpaired(ulrick)\nSterile(albert)\nIntuitive(albert)\nUninspired(ephrem)\nnot Serrated(ephrem)\nnot Intuitive(ephrem)\nUnimpaired(ephrem)\nforall x (False(x) -> not Sneak(x))\nforall x (Serrated(x) -> False(x))\nforall x (Sneak(x) and Serrated(x) -> False(x))\nforall x (Intuitive(x) -> not Serrated(x))\nforall x (Serrated(x) -> not Uninspired(x))\nnot Serrated(albert) -> not Uninspired(albert)\n\nnot False(albert)\n\nforall x (Serrated(x) -> False(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Arlene is unladylike. Arlene is cusped. Arlene is perfervid. Arlene is evitable. Arlene is not disjoined. Arlene is inexpiable. Benedict is cusped. Benedict is perfervid. Sashenka is unladylike. Sashenka is not calceiform. Sashenka is not perfervid. Sashenka is inexpiable. If something is evitable then it is not disjoined. If something is calceiform then it is evitable. Smart, calceiform things are evitable. If something is perfervid then it is not calceiform. If something is calceiform then it is not unladylike. If Benedict is not calceiform then Benedict is not unladylike. Sashenka is evitable.", "logic": "\nUnladylike(arlene)\nCusped(arlene)\nPerfervid(arlene)\nEvitable(arlene)\nnot Disjoined(arlene)\nInexpiable(arlene)\nCusped(benedict)\nPerfervid(benedict)\nUnladylike(sashenka)\nnot Calceiform(sashenka)\nnot Perfervid(sashenka)\nInexpiable(sashenka)\nforall x (Evitable(x) -> not Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> Evitable(x))\nforall x (Disjoined(x) and Calceiform(x) -> Evitable(x))\nforall x (Perfervid(x) -> not Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> not Unladylike(x))\nnot Calceiform(benedict) -> not Unladylike(benedict)\n\nEvitable(sashenka)\n\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> Evitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Luella is maximising. Luella is contrived. Luella is vatical. Luella is depraved. Luella is not honest. Luella is posted. Lea is contrived. Lea is vatical. Adina is maximising. Adina is not equatorial. Adina is not vatical. Adina is posted. If something is depraved then it is not honest. If something is equatorial then it is depraved. Smart, equatorial things are depraved. If something is vatical then it is not equatorial. If something is equatorial then it is not maximising. If Lea is not equatorial then Lea is not maximising. Adina is not contrived.", "logic": "\nMaximising(luella)\nContrived(luella)\nVatical(luella)\nDepraved(luella)\nnot Honest(luella)\nPosted(luella)\nContrived(lea)\nVatical(lea)\nMaximising(adina)\nnot Equatorial(adina)\nnot Vatical(adina)\nPosted(adina)\nforall x (Depraved(x) -> not Honest(x))\nforall x (Equatorial(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Honest(x) and Equatorial(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Vatical(x) -> not Equatorial(x))\nforall x (Equatorial(x) -> not Maximising(x))\nnot Equatorial(lea) -> not Maximising(lea)\n\nnot Contrived(adina)\n\nnot Contrived(adina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Chriss is malefic. Chriss is surpassing. Chriss is auxinic. Chriss is algophobic. Chriss is not brimless. Chriss is bodacious. Quintina is surpassing. Quintina is auxinic. Elissa is malefic. Elissa is not insensate. Elissa is not auxinic. Elissa is bodacious. If something is algophobic then it is not brimless. If something is insensate then it is algophobic. Smart, insensate things are algophobic. If something is auxinic then it is not insensate. If something is insensate then it is not malefic. If Quintina is not insensate then Quintina is not malefic. Elissa is brimless.", "logic": "\nMalefic(chriss)\nSurpassing(chriss)\nAuxinic(chriss)\nAlgophobic(chriss)\nnot Brimless(chriss)\nBodacious(chriss)\nSurpassing(quintina)\nAuxinic(quintina)\nMalefic(elissa)\nnot Insensate(elissa)\nnot Auxinic(elissa)\nBodacious(elissa)\nforall x (Algophobic(x) -> not Brimless(x))\nforall x (Insensate(x) -> Algophobic(x))\nforall x (Brimless(x) and Insensate(x) -> Algophobic(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> not Insensate(x))\nforall x (Insensate(x) -> not Malefic(x))\nnot Insensate(quintina) -> not Malefic(quintina)\n\nBrimless(elissa)\n\nBrimless(elissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Miguela is ardent. Miguela is unknowing. Miguela is childly. Miguela is unwished. Miguela is not underlying. Miguela is unnoticed. Jocelin is unknowing. Jocelin is childly. Meira is ardent. Meira is not flustered. Meira is not childly. Meira is unnoticed. If something is unwished then it is not underlying. If something is flustered then it is unwished. Smart, flustered things are unwished. If something is childly then it is not flustered. If something is flustered then it is not ardent. If Jocelin is not flustered then Jocelin is not ardent. Jocelin is not unnoticed.", "logic": "\nArdent(miguela)\nUnknowing(miguela)\nChildly(miguela)\nUnwished(miguela)\nnot Underlying(miguela)\nUnnoticed(miguela)\nUnknowing(jocelin)\nChildly(jocelin)\nArdent(meira)\nnot Flustered(meira)\nnot Childly(meira)\nUnnoticed(meira)\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> not Underlying(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Unwished(x))\nforall x (Underlying(x) and Flustered(x) -> Unwished(x))\nforall x (Childly(x) -> not Flustered(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> not Ardent(x))\nnot Flustered(jocelin) -> not Ardent(jocelin)\n\nnot Unnoticed(jocelin)\n\nnot Unnoticed(jocelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "Reeba is carnassial. Reeba is sterilised. Reeba is aplitic. Reeba is dismissed. Reeba is not tailored. Reeba is occupied. Tammie is sterilised. Tammie is aplitic. Carly is carnassial. Carly is not basined. Carly is not aplitic. Carly is occupied. If something is dismissed then it is not tailored. If something is basined then it is dismissed. Smart, basined things are dismissed. If something is aplitic then it is not basined. If something is basined then it is not carnassial. If Tammie is not basined then Tammie is not carnassial. Tammie is tailored.", "logic": "\nCarnassial(reeba)\nSterilised(reeba)\nAplitic(reeba)\nDismissed(reeba)\nnot Tailored(reeba)\nOccupied(reeba)\nSterilised(tammie)\nAplitic(tammie)\nCarnassial(carly)\nnot Basined(carly)\nnot Aplitic(carly)\nOccupied(carly)\nforall x (Dismissed(x) -> not Tailored(x))\nforall x (Basined(x) -> Dismissed(x))\nforall x (Tailored(x) and Basined(x) -> Dismissed(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) -> not Basined(x))\nforall x (Basined(x) -> not Carnassial(x))\nnot Basined(tammie) -> not Carnassial(tammie)\n\nTailored(tammie)\n\nTailored(tammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-69"} {"premises": "The david does not chase the agna. The david fashion the barby. The dennis is ironical. The agna is prolate. The barby does not eat the david. The barby fashion the david. The barby fashion the agna. If the david is ironical then the david yodel the dennis. Rough things are septal. If something pervert the dennis and it yodel the barby then it yodel the agna. If something fashion the barby then it is ametabolic. If the barby is ironical and the barby fashion the agna then the barby fashion the david. If something is prolate then it pervert the barby. If something fashion the agna and it pervert the barby then it does not eat the agna. If the david pervert the dennis and the david is not septal then the dennis pervert the barby. The barby fashion the agna.", "logic": "\nnot Yodel(david, agna)\nFashion(david, barby)\nIronical(dennis)\nProlate(agna)\nnot Pervert(barby, david)\nFashion(barby, david)\nFashion(barby, agna)\nIronical(david) -> Yodel(david, dennis)\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Pervert(x, dennis) and Yodel(x, barby) -> Yodel(x, agna))\nforall x (Fashion(x, barby) -> Ametabolic(x))\nIronical(barby) and Fashion(barby, agna) -> Fashion(barby, david)\nforall x (Prolate(x) -> Pervert(x, barby))\nforall x (Fashion(x, agna) and Pervert(x, barby) -> not Pervert(x, agna))\nPervert(david, dennis) and not Septal(david) -> Pervert(dennis, barby)\n\nFashion(barby, agna)\n\ntherefore Fashion(barby, agna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The ernie does not chase the fredia. The ernie recite the carolyne. The jessalyn is cystic. The fredia is negative. The carolyne does not eat the ernie. The carolyne recite the ernie. The carolyne recite the fredia. If the ernie is cystic then the ernie eclipse the jessalyn. Rough things are cruddy. If something rein the jessalyn and it eclipse the carolyne then it eclipse the fredia. If something recite the carolyne then it is marmorean. If the carolyne is cystic and the carolyne recite the fredia then the carolyne recite the ernie. If something is negative then it rein the carolyne. If something recite the fredia and it rein the carolyne then it does not eat the fredia. If the ernie rein the jessalyn and the ernie is not cruddy then the jessalyn rein the carolyne. The fredia is not negative.", "logic": "\nnot Eclipse(ernie, fredia)\nRecite(ernie, carolyne)\nCystic(jessalyn)\nNegative(fredia)\nnot Rein(carolyne, ernie)\nRecite(carolyne, ernie)\nRecite(carolyne, fredia)\nCystic(ernie) -> Eclipse(ernie, jessalyn)\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Rein(x, jessalyn) and Eclipse(x, carolyne) -> Eclipse(x, fredia))\nforall x (Recite(x, carolyne) -> Marmorean(x))\nCystic(carolyne) and Recite(carolyne, fredia) -> Recite(carolyne, ernie)\nforall x (Negative(x) -> Rein(x, carolyne))\nforall x (Recite(x, fredia) and Rein(x, carolyne) -> not Rein(x, fredia))\nRein(ernie, jessalyn) and not Cruddy(ernie) -> Rein(jessalyn, carolyne)\n\nnot Negative(fredia)\n\ntherefore Negative(fredia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The tandy does not chase the guinna. The tandy repulse the shanan. The idette is flavourful. The guinna is monkish. The shanan does not eat the tandy. The shanan repulse the tandy. The shanan repulse the guinna. If the tandy is flavourful then the tandy reassign the idette. Rough things are atactic. If something telescope the idette and it reassign the shanan then it reassign the guinna. If something repulse the shanan then it is parametric. If the shanan is flavourful and the shanan repulse the guinna then the shanan repulse the tandy. If something is monkish then it telescope the shanan. If something repulse the guinna and it telescope the shanan then it does not eat the guinna. If the tandy telescope the idette and the tandy is not atactic then the idette telescope the shanan. The guinna telescope the shanan.", "logic": "\nnot Reassign(tandy, guinna)\nRepulse(tandy, shanan)\nFlavourful(idette)\nMonkish(guinna)\nnot Telescope(shanan, tandy)\nRepulse(shanan, tandy)\nRepulse(shanan, guinna)\nFlavourful(tandy) -> Reassign(tandy, idette)\nforall x (Parametric(x) -> Atactic(x))\nforall x (Telescope(x, idette) and Reassign(x, shanan) -> Reassign(x, guinna))\nforall x (Repulse(x, shanan) -> Parametric(x))\nFlavourful(shanan) and Repulse(shanan, guinna) -> Repulse(shanan, tandy)\nforall x (Monkish(x) -> Telescope(x, shanan))\nforall x (Repulse(x, guinna) and Telescope(x, shanan) -> not Telescope(x, guinna))\nTelescope(tandy, idette) and not Atactic(tandy) -> Telescope(idette, shanan)\n\nTelescope(guinna, shanan)\n\nMonkish(guinna) and forall x (Monkish(x) -> Telescope(x, shanan)) -> therefore Telescope(guinna, shanan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The theadora does not chase the alberto. The theadora horrify the joycelin. The dianna is triclinic. The alberto is livelong. The joycelin does not eat the theadora. The joycelin horrify the theadora. The joycelin horrify the alberto. If the theadora is triclinic then the theadora tamp the dianna. Rough things are seafaring. If something crock the dianna and it tamp the joycelin then it tamp the alberto. If something horrify the joycelin then it is fattish. If the joycelin is triclinic and the joycelin horrify the alberto then the joycelin horrify the theadora. If something is livelong then it crock the joycelin. If something horrify the alberto and it crock the joycelin then it does not eat the alberto. If the theadora crock the dianna and the theadora is not seafaring then the dianna crock the joycelin. The theadora is not fattish.", "logic": "\nnot Tamp(theadora, alberto)\nHorrify(theadora, joycelin)\nTriclinic(dianna)\nLivelong(alberto)\nnot Crock(joycelin, theadora)\nHorrify(joycelin, theadora)\nHorrify(joycelin, alberto)\nTriclinic(theadora) -> Tamp(theadora, dianna)\nforall x (Fattish(x) -> Seafaring(x))\nforall x (Crock(x, dianna) and Tamp(x, joycelin) -> Tamp(x, alberto))\nforall x (Horrify(x, joycelin) -> Fattish(x))\nTriclinic(joycelin) and Horrify(joycelin, alberto) -> Horrify(joycelin, theadora)\nforall x (Livelong(x) -> Crock(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Horrify(x, alberto) and Crock(x, joycelin) -> not Crock(x, alberto))\nCrock(theadora, dianna) and not Seafaring(theadora) -> Crock(dianna, joycelin)\n\nnot Fattish(theadora)\n\nHorrify(theadora, joycelin) and forall x (Horrify(x, joycelin) -> Fattish(x)) -> therefore Fattish(theadora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The cybelle does not chase the artur. The cybelle whack the vergil. The ortensia is parentless. The artur is duodecimal. The vergil does not eat the cybelle. The vergil whack the cybelle. The vergil whack the artur. If the cybelle is parentless then the cybelle streak the ortensia. Rough things are sulphuric. If something precess the ortensia and it streak the vergil then it streak the artur. If something whack the vergil then it is maimed. If the vergil is parentless and the vergil whack the artur then the vergil whack the cybelle. If something is duodecimal then it precess the vergil. If something whack the artur and it precess the vergil then it does not eat the artur. If the cybelle precess the ortensia and the cybelle is not sulphuric then the ortensia precess the vergil. The cybelle is sulphuric.", "logic": "\nnot Streak(cybelle, artur)\nWhack(cybelle, vergil)\nParentless(ortensia)\nDuodecimal(artur)\nnot Precess(vergil, cybelle)\nWhack(vergil, cybelle)\nWhack(vergil, artur)\nParentless(cybelle) -> Streak(cybelle, ortensia)\nforall x (Maimed(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Precess(x, ortensia) and Streak(x, vergil) -> Streak(x, artur))\nforall x (Whack(x, vergil) -> Maimed(x))\nParentless(vergil) and Whack(vergil, artur) -> Whack(vergil, cybelle)\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> Precess(x, vergil))\nforall x (Whack(x, artur) and Precess(x, vergil) -> not Precess(x, artur))\nPrecess(cybelle, ortensia) and not Sulphuric(cybelle) -> Precess(ortensia, vergil)\n\nSulphuric(cybelle)\n\nWhack(cybelle, vergil) and forall x (Whack(x, vergil) -> Maimed(x)) -> therefore Maimed(cybelle) Maimed(cybelle) and forall x (Maimed(x) -> Sulphuric(x)) -> therefore Sulphuric(cybelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The huey does not chase the tremayne. The huey bicycle the margo. The sheela is visceral. The tremayne is fleshy. The margo does not eat the huey. The margo bicycle the huey. The margo bicycle the tremayne. If the huey is visceral then the huey criticize the sheela. Rough things are exogamic. If something marbleize the sheela and it criticize the margo then it criticize the tremayne. If something bicycle the margo then it is ornamental. If the margo is visceral and the margo bicycle the tremayne then the margo bicycle the huey. If something is fleshy then it marbleize the margo. If something bicycle the tremayne and it marbleize the margo then it does not eat the tremayne. If the huey marbleize the sheela and the huey is not exogamic then the sheela marbleize the margo. The huey is not exogamic.", "logic": "\nnot Criticize(huey, tremayne)\nBicycle(huey, margo)\nVisceral(sheela)\nFleshy(tremayne)\nnot Marbleize(margo, huey)\nBicycle(margo, huey)\nBicycle(margo, tremayne)\nVisceral(huey) -> Criticize(huey, sheela)\nforall x (Ornamental(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Marbleize(x, sheela) and Criticize(x, margo) -> Criticize(x, tremayne))\nforall x (Bicycle(x, margo) -> Ornamental(x))\nVisceral(margo) and Bicycle(margo, tremayne) -> Bicycle(margo, huey)\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Marbleize(x, margo))\nforall x (Bicycle(x, tremayne) and Marbleize(x, margo) -> not Marbleize(x, tremayne))\nMarbleize(huey, sheela) and not Exogamic(huey) -> Marbleize(sheela, margo)\n\nnot Exogamic(huey)\n\nBicycle(huey, margo) and forall x (Bicycle(x, margo) -> Ornamental(x)) -> therefore Ornamental(huey) Ornamental(huey) and forall x (Ornamental(x) -> Exogamic(x)) -> therefore Exogamic(huey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The sergeant does not chase the nealson. The sergeant lallygag the steffi. The sharra is reigning. The nealson is unfeminine. The steffi does not eat the sergeant. The steffi lallygag the sergeant. The steffi lallygag the nealson. If the sergeant is reigning then the sergeant potentiate the sharra. Rough things are stooped. If something ammoniate the sharra and it potentiate the steffi then it potentiate the nealson. If something lallygag the steffi then it is sinhala. If the steffi is reigning and the steffi lallygag the nealson then the steffi lallygag the sergeant. If something is unfeminine then it ammoniate the steffi. If something lallygag the nealson and it ammoniate the steffi then it does not eat the nealson. If the sergeant ammoniate the sharra and the sergeant is not stooped then the sharra ammoniate the steffi. The sergeant does not eat the steffi.", "logic": "\nnot Potentiate(sergeant, nealson)\nLallygag(sergeant, steffi)\nReigning(sharra)\nUnfeminine(nealson)\nnot Ammoniate(steffi, sergeant)\nLallygag(steffi, sergeant)\nLallygag(steffi, nealson)\nReigning(sergeant) -> Potentiate(sergeant, sharra)\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Stooped(x))\nforall x (Ammoniate(x, sharra) and Potentiate(x, steffi) -> Potentiate(x, nealson))\nforall x (Lallygag(x, steffi) -> Sinhala(x))\nReigning(steffi) and Lallygag(steffi, nealson) -> Lallygag(steffi, sergeant)\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) -> Ammoniate(x, steffi))\nforall x (Lallygag(x, nealson) and Ammoniate(x, steffi) -> not Ammoniate(x, nealson))\nAmmoniate(sergeant, sharra) and not Stooped(sergeant) -> Ammoniate(sharra, steffi)\n\nnot Ammoniate(sergeant, steffi)\n\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) -> Ammoniate(x, steffi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The pauletta does not chase the jory. The pauletta coggle the catrina. The solly is cxlv. The jory is hedged. The catrina does not eat the pauletta. The catrina coggle the pauletta. The catrina coggle the jory. If the pauletta is cxlv then the pauletta commentate the solly. Rough things are isochronal. If something declassify the solly and it commentate the catrina then it commentate the jory. If something coggle the catrina then it is carsick. If the catrina is cxlv and the catrina coggle the jory then the catrina coggle the pauletta. If something is hedged then it declassify the catrina. If something coggle the jory and it declassify the catrina then it does not eat the jory. If the pauletta declassify the solly and the pauletta is not isochronal then the solly declassify the catrina. The solly is isochronal.", "logic": "\nnot Commentate(pauletta, jory)\nCoggle(pauletta, catrina)\nCxlv(solly)\nHedged(jory)\nnot Declassify(catrina, pauletta)\nCoggle(catrina, pauletta)\nCoggle(catrina, jory)\nCxlv(pauletta) -> Commentate(pauletta, solly)\nforall x (Carsick(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nforall x (Declassify(x, solly) and Commentate(x, catrina) -> Commentate(x, jory))\nforall x (Coggle(x, catrina) -> Carsick(x))\nCxlv(catrina) and Coggle(catrina, jory) -> Coggle(catrina, pauletta)\nforall x (Hedged(x) -> Declassify(x, catrina))\nforall x (Coggle(x, jory) and Declassify(x, catrina) -> not Declassify(x, jory))\nDeclassify(pauletta, solly) and not Isochronal(pauletta) -> Declassify(solly, catrina)\n\nIsochronal(solly)\n\nforall x (Carsick(x) -> Isochronal(x)) <- forall x (Coggle(x, catrina) -> Carsick(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The wyatan does not chase the patrica. The wyatan unstuff the todd. The sybila is empyrean. The patrica is defensive. The todd does not eat the wyatan. The todd unstuff the wyatan. The todd unstuff the patrica. If the wyatan is empyrean then the wyatan resift the sybila. Rough things are poor. If something relish the sybila and it resift the todd then it resift the patrica. If something unstuff the todd then it is repressing. If the todd is empyrean and the todd unstuff the patrica then the todd unstuff the wyatan. If something is defensive then it relish the todd. If something unstuff the patrica and it relish the todd then it does not eat the patrica. If the wyatan relish the sybila and the wyatan is not poor then the sybila relish the todd. The patrica is not poor.", "logic": "\nnot Resift(wyatan, patrica)\nUnstuff(wyatan, todd)\nEmpyrean(sybila)\nDefensive(patrica)\nnot Relish(todd, wyatan)\nUnstuff(todd, wyatan)\nUnstuff(todd, patrica)\nEmpyrean(wyatan) -> Resift(wyatan, sybila)\nforall x (Repressing(x) -> Poor(x))\nforall x (Relish(x, sybila) and Resift(x, todd) -> Resift(x, patrica))\nforall x (Unstuff(x, todd) -> Repressing(x))\nEmpyrean(todd) and Unstuff(todd, patrica) -> Unstuff(todd, wyatan)\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Relish(x, todd))\nforall x (Unstuff(x, patrica) and Relish(x, todd) -> not Relish(x, patrica))\nRelish(wyatan, sybila) and not Poor(wyatan) -> Relish(sybila, todd)\n\nnot Poor(patrica)\n\nforall x (Repressing(x) -> Poor(x)) <- forall x (Unstuff(x, todd) -> Repressing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The joice does not chase the sting. The joice shoulder the konstance. The gwenni is waterproof. The sting is insured. The konstance does not eat the joice. The konstance shoulder the joice. The konstance shoulder the sting. If the joice is waterproof then the joice apprize the gwenni. Rough things are cuneiform. If something carnalize the gwenni and it apprize the konstance then it apprize the sting. If something shoulder the konstance then it is affine. If the konstance is waterproof and the konstance shoulder the sting then the konstance shoulder the joice. If something is insured then it carnalize the konstance. If something shoulder the sting and it carnalize the konstance then it does not eat the sting. If the joice carnalize the gwenni and the joice is not cuneiform then the gwenni carnalize the konstance. The sting apprize the gwenni.", "logic": "\nnot Apprize(joice, sting)\nShoulder(joice, konstance)\nWaterproof(gwenni)\nInsured(sting)\nnot Carnalize(konstance, joice)\nShoulder(konstance, joice)\nShoulder(konstance, sting)\nWaterproof(joice) -> Apprize(joice, gwenni)\nforall x (Affine(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Carnalize(x, gwenni) and Apprize(x, konstance) -> Apprize(x, sting))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, konstance) -> Affine(x))\nWaterproof(konstance) and Shoulder(konstance, sting) -> Shoulder(konstance, joice)\nforall x (Insured(x) -> Carnalize(x, konstance))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, sting) and Carnalize(x, konstance) -> not Carnalize(x, sting))\nCarnalize(joice, gwenni) and not Cuneiform(joice) -> Carnalize(gwenni, konstance)\n\nApprize(sting, gwenni)\n\nApprize(sting, gwenni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The rubia does not chase the vic. The rubia mesmerize the erny. The antoni is alone. The vic is unlikely. The erny does not eat the rubia. The erny mesmerize the rubia. The erny mesmerize the vic. If the rubia is alone then the rubia reimburse the antoni. Rough things are breeding. If something punt the antoni and it reimburse the erny then it reimburse the vic. If something mesmerize the erny then it is polynesian. If the erny is alone and the erny mesmerize the vic then the erny mesmerize the rubia. If something is unlikely then it punt the erny. If something mesmerize the vic and it punt the erny then it does not eat the vic. If the rubia punt the antoni and the rubia is not breeding then the antoni punt the erny. The rubia does not chase the rubia.", "logic": "\nnot Reimburse(rubia, vic)\nMesmerize(rubia, erny)\nAlone(antoni)\nUnlikely(vic)\nnot Punt(erny, rubia)\nMesmerize(erny, rubia)\nMesmerize(erny, vic)\nAlone(rubia) -> Reimburse(rubia, antoni)\nforall x (Polynesian(x) -> Breeding(x))\nforall x (Punt(x, antoni) and Reimburse(x, erny) -> Reimburse(x, vic))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, erny) -> Polynesian(x))\nAlone(erny) and Mesmerize(erny, vic) -> Mesmerize(erny, rubia)\nforall x (Unlikely(x) -> Punt(x, erny))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, vic) and Punt(x, erny) -> not Punt(x, vic))\nPunt(rubia, antoni) and not Breeding(rubia) -> Punt(antoni, erny)\n\nnot Reimburse(rubia, rubia)\n\nnot Reimburse(rubia, rubia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "The clinton does not chase the giana. The clinton bowse the adah. The emalee is thriftless. The giana is acidotic. The adah does not eat the clinton. The adah bowse the clinton. The adah bowse the giana. If the clinton is thriftless then the clinton canvas the emalee. Rough things are ransomed. If something eternise the emalee and it canvas the adah then it canvas the giana. If something bowse the adah then it is cyclic. If the adah is thriftless and the adah bowse the giana then the adah bowse the clinton. If something is acidotic then it eternise the adah. If something bowse the giana and it eternise the adah then it does not eat the giana. If the clinton eternise the emalee and the clinton is not ransomed then the emalee eternise the adah. The emalee canvas the clinton.", "logic": "\nnot Canvas(clinton, giana)\nBowse(clinton, adah)\nThriftless(emalee)\nAcidotic(giana)\nnot Eternise(adah, clinton)\nBowse(adah, clinton)\nBowse(adah, giana)\nThriftless(clinton) -> Canvas(clinton, emalee)\nforall x (Cyclic(x) -> Ransomed(x))\nforall x (Eternise(x, emalee) and Canvas(x, adah) -> Canvas(x, giana))\nforall x (Bowse(x, adah) -> Cyclic(x))\nThriftless(adah) and Bowse(adah, giana) -> Bowse(adah, clinton)\nforall x (Acidotic(x) -> Eternise(x, adah))\nforall x (Bowse(x, giana) and Eternise(x, adah) -> not Eternise(x, giana))\nEternise(clinton, emalee) and not Ransomed(clinton) -> Eternise(emalee, adah)\n\nCanvas(emalee, clinton)\n\nCanvas(emalee, clinton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1377"} {"premises": "Priscella is primitive. Giffy is invincible. Hollyanne is adored. Osborne is unconfused. If something is invincible then it is actual. If Giffy is actual then Giffy is adored. If something is primitive then it is adored. Furry, unconfused things are primitive. All primitive things are unconfused. Blue things are nasal. Priscella is primitive.", "logic": "\nPrimitive(priscella)\nInvincible(giffy)\nAdored(hollyanne)\nUnconfused(osborne)\nforall x (Invincible(x) -> Actual(x))\nActual(giffy) -> Adored(giffy)\nforall x (Primitive(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Invincible(x) and Unconfused(x) -> Primitive(x))\nforall x (Primitive(x) -> Unconfused(x))\nforall x (Unconfused(x) -> Nasal(x))\n\nPrimitive(priscella)\n\ntherefore Primitive(priscella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Elsy is separatist. Leandra is minimized. Rolph is backward. Lorrin is embryonal. If something is minimized then it is acceptive. If Leandra is acceptive then Leandra is backward. If something is separatist then it is backward. Furry, embryonal things are separatist. All separatist things are embryonal. Blue things are canned. Elsy is not separatist.", "logic": "\nSeparatist(elsy)\nMinimized(leandra)\nBackward(rolph)\nEmbryonal(lorrin)\nforall x (Minimized(x) -> Acceptive(x))\nAcceptive(leandra) -> Backward(leandra)\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Minimized(x) and Embryonal(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Embryonal(x))\nforall x (Embryonal(x) -> Canned(x))\n\nnot Separatist(elsy)\n\ntherefore Separatist(elsy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Malcolm is gelatinous. Laird is onstage. Jed is eatable. Rolando is roumanian. If something is onstage then it is deliberate. If Laird is deliberate then Laird is eatable. If something is gelatinous then it is eatable. Furry, roumanian things are gelatinous. All gelatinous things are roumanian. Blue things are clever. Malcolm is eatable.", "logic": "\nGelatinous(malcolm)\nOnstage(laird)\nEatable(jed)\nRoumanian(rolando)\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nDeliberate(laird) -> Eatable(laird)\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) -> Eatable(x))\nforall x (Onstage(x) and Roumanian(x) -> Gelatinous(x))\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) -> Roumanian(x))\nforall x (Roumanian(x) -> Clever(x))\n\nEatable(malcolm)\n\nGelatinous(malcolm) and forall x (Gelatinous(x) -> Eatable(x)) -> therefore Eatable(malcolm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Zarla is icelandic. Jemmy is masoretic. Caren is unheaded. Sandor is fleshly. If something is masoretic then it is laden. If Jemmy is laden then Jemmy is unheaded. If something is icelandic then it is unheaded. Furry, fleshly things are icelandic. All icelandic things are fleshly. Blue things are parthian. Zarla is not fleshly.", "logic": "\nIcelandic(zarla)\nMasoretic(jemmy)\nUnheaded(caren)\nFleshly(sandor)\nforall x (Masoretic(x) -> Laden(x))\nLaden(jemmy) -> Unheaded(jemmy)\nforall x (Icelandic(x) -> Unheaded(x))\nforall x (Masoretic(x) and Fleshly(x) -> Icelandic(x))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) -> Fleshly(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) -> Parthian(x))\n\nnot Fleshly(zarla)\n\nIcelandic(zarla) and forall x (Icelandic(x) -> Fleshly(x)) -> therefore Fleshly(zarla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Corri is fanged. Halli is seismic. Emmit is cellular. Kalindi is germy. If something is seismic then it is slimed. If Halli is slimed then Halli is cellular. If something is fanged then it is cellular. Furry, germy things are fanged. All fanged things are germy. Blue things are sallow. Corri is sallow.", "logic": "\nFanged(corri)\nSeismic(halli)\nCellular(emmit)\nGermy(kalindi)\nforall x (Seismic(x) -> Slimed(x))\nSlimed(halli) -> Cellular(halli)\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Cellular(x))\nforall x (Seismic(x) and Germy(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Germy(x))\nforall x (Germy(x) -> Sallow(x))\n\nSallow(corri)\n\nFanged(corri) and forall x (Fanged(x) -> Germy(x)) -> therefore Germy(corri) Germy(corri) and forall x (Germy(x) -> Sallow(x)) -> therefore Sallow(corri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Avery is spicy. Bette is matt. Rennie is sandlike. Arabelle is corrupting. If something is matt then it is nettled. If Bette is nettled then Bette is sandlike. If something is spicy then it is sandlike. Furry, corrupting things are spicy. All spicy things are corrupting. Blue things are ferocious. Bette is not sandlike.", "logic": "\nSpicy(avery)\nMatt(bette)\nSandlike(rennie)\nCorrupting(arabelle)\nforall x (Matt(x) -> Nettled(x))\nNettled(bette) -> Sandlike(bette)\nforall x (Spicy(x) -> Sandlike(x))\nforall x (Matt(x) and Corrupting(x) -> Spicy(x))\nforall x (Spicy(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nforall x (Corrupting(x) -> Ferocious(x))\n\nnot Sandlike(bette)\n\nMatt(bette) and forall x (Matt(x) -> Nettled(x)) -> therefore Nettled(bette) Nettled(bette) and Nettled(bette) -> Sandlike(bette) -> therefore Sandlike(bette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Demetra is insolent. Melina is filmy. Winna is paperback. Elberta is blessed. If something is filmy then it is incessant. If Melina is incessant then Melina is paperback. If something is insolent then it is paperback. Furry, blessed things are insolent. All insolent things are blessed. Blue things are blest. Winna is not blest.", "logic": "\nInsolent(demetra)\nFilmy(melina)\nPaperback(winna)\nBlessed(elberta)\nforall x (Filmy(x) -> Incessant(x))\nIncessant(melina) -> Paperback(melina)\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Paperback(x))\nforall x (Filmy(x) and Blessed(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Blessed(x))\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> Blest(x))\n\nnot Blest(winna)\n\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> Blest(x)) <- forall x (Insolent(x) -> Blessed(x)) <- forall x (Filmy(x) and Blessed(x) -> Insolent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Crystal is toothlike. Tatiana is tonsorial. Rockwell is hieratical. Anthia is parochial. If something is tonsorial then it is pyramidal. If Tatiana is pyramidal then Tatiana is hieratical. If something is toothlike then it is hieratical. Furry, parochial things are toothlike. All toothlike things are parochial. Blue things are draining. Rockwell is parochial.", "logic": "\nToothlike(crystal)\nTonsorial(tatiana)\nHieratical(rockwell)\nParochial(anthia)\nforall x (Tonsorial(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nPyramidal(tatiana) -> Hieratical(tatiana)\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Tonsorial(x) and Parochial(x) -> Toothlike(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Parochial(x))\nforall x (Parochial(x) -> Draining(x))\n\nParochial(rockwell)\n\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Parochial(x)) <- forall x (Tonsorial(x) and Parochial(x) -> Toothlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Alford is restrained. Dido is unshakable. Caspar is inured. Elinor is lxxv. If something is unshakable then it is collegiate. If Dido is collegiate then Dido is inured. If something is restrained then it is inured. Furry, lxxv things are restrained. All restrained things are lxxv. Blue things are wrenching. Elinor is not inured.", "logic": "\nRestrained(alford)\nUnshakable(dido)\nInured(caspar)\nLxxv(elinor)\nforall x (Unshakable(x) -> Collegiate(x))\nCollegiate(dido) -> Inured(dido)\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) and Lxxv(x) -> Restrained(x))\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Lxxv(x))\nforall x (Lxxv(x) -> Wrenching(x))\n\nnot Inured(elinor)\n\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Inured(x)) <- forall x (Unshakable(x) and Lxxv(x) -> Restrained(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Lester is willful. Donn is unshaved. Rafaelia is chartless. Malcah is nightly. If something is unshaved then it is resentful. If Donn is resentful then Donn is chartless. If something is willful then it is chartless. Furry, nightly things are willful. All willful things are nightly. Blue things are uninspired. Rafaelia is kind.", "logic": "\nWillful(lester)\nUnshaved(donn)\nChartless(rafaelia)\nNightly(malcah)\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Resentful(x))\nResentful(donn) -> Chartless(donn)\nforall x (Willful(x) -> Chartless(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) and Nightly(x) -> Willful(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) -> Nightly(x))\nforall x (Nightly(x) -> Uninspired(x))\n\nKind(rafaelia)\n\nKind(rafaelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Istvan is knifelike. Monika is eastside. Liora is aqueous. Otha is plastered. If something is eastside then it is menial. If Monika is menial then Monika is aqueous. If something is knifelike then it is aqueous. Furry, plastered things are knifelike. All knifelike things are plastered. Blue things are numinous. Istvan is not kind.", "logic": "\nKnifelike(istvan)\nEastside(monika)\nAqueous(liora)\nPlastered(otha)\nforall x (Eastside(x) -> Menial(x))\nMenial(monika) -> Aqueous(monika)\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Aqueous(x))\nforall x (Eastside(x) and Plastered(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Plastered(x) -> Numinous(x))\n\nnot Kind(istvan)\n\nnot Kind(istvan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Rustin is speechless. Carey is capable. Rob is enumerable. Deva is tricolor. If something is capable then it is schoolwide. If Carey is schoolwide then Carey is enumerable. If something is speechless then it is enumerable. Furry, tricolor things are speechless. All speechless things are tricolor. Blue things are inaccurate. Deva is capable.", "logic": "\nSpeechless(rustin)\nCapable(carey)\nEnumerable(rob)\nTricolor(deva)\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Schoolwide(x))\nSchoolwide(carey) -> Enumerable(carey)\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and Tricolor(x) -> Speechless(x))\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Tricolor(x) -> Inaccurate(x))\n\nCapable(deva)\n\nCapable(deva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The aura does not chase the emilee. The aura does not eat the idalina. The aura is thwarting. The aura is papist. The aura is colourful. The aura cone the idalina. The emilee prowl the aura. The emilee gang the aura. The emilee is not riddled. The emilee cone the aura. The emilee cone the idalina. The idalina prowl the aura. The idalina prowl the emilee. The idalina does not chase the pedro. The idalina is papist. The pedro gang the idalina. If someone cone the idalina then the idalina is colourful. If the aura prowl the emilee and the aura does not see the emilee then the emilee is papist. If someone is colourful and they chase the aura then the aura gang the emilee. The emilee cone the aura.", "logic": "\nnot Prowl(aura, emilee)\nnot Gang(aura, idalina)\nThwarting(aura)\nPapist(aura)\nColourful(aura)\nCone(aura, idalina)\nProwl(emilee, aura)\nGang(emilee, aura)\nnot Riddled(emilee)\nCone(emilee, aura)\nCone(emilee, idalina)\nProwl(idalina, aura)\nProwl(idalina, emilee)\nnot Prowl(idalina, pedro)\nPapist(idalina)\nGang(pedro, idalina)\nforall x (Cone(x, idalina) -> Colourful(idalina))\nProwl(aura, emilee) and not Cone(aura, emilee) -> Papist(emilee)\nforall x (Colourful(x) and Prowl(x, aura) -> Gang(aura, emilee))\n\nCone(emilee, aura)\n\ntherefore Cone(emilee, aura)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The putnam does not chase the laureen. The putnam does not eat the netta. The putnam is sultry. The putnam is arthritic. The putnam is inflated. The putnam bedaub the netta. The laureen full the putnam. The laureen recoil the putnam. The laureen is not wrecked. The laureen bedaub the putnam. The laureen bedaub the netta. The netta full the putnam. The netta full the laureen. The netta does not chase the gabe. The netta is arthritic. The gabe recoil the netta. If someone bedaub the netta then the netta is inflated. If the putnam full the laureen and the putnam does not see the laureen then the laureen is arthritic. If someone is inflated and they chase the putnam then the putnam recoil the laureen. The putnam is not sultry.", "logic": "\nnot Full(putnam, laureen)\nnot Recoil(putnam, netta)\nSultry(putnam)\nArthritic(putnam)\nInflated(putnam)\nBedaub(putnam, netta)\nFull(laureen, putnam)\nRecoil(laureen, putnam)\nnot Wrecked(laureen)\nBedaub(laureen, putnam)\nBedaub(laureen, netta)\nFull(netta, putnam)\nFull(netta, laureen)\nnot Full(netta, gabe)\nArthritic(netta)\nRecoil(gabe, netta)\nforall x (Bedaub(x, netta) -> Inflated(netta))\nFull(putnam, laureen) and not Bedaub(putnam, laureen) -> Arthritic(laureen)\nforall x (Inflated(x) and Full(x, putnam) -> Recoil(putnam, laureen))\n\nnot Sultry(putnam)\n\ntherefore Sultry(putnam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The shell does not chase the conchita. The shell does not eat the carson. The shell is scaly. The shell is enlivening. The shell is senior. The shell whirlpool the carson. The conchita stoke the shell. The conchita fellate the shell. The conchita is not shoddy. The conchita whirlpool the shell. The conchita whirlpool the carson. The carson stoke the shell. The carson stoke the conchita. The carson does not chase the sergent. The carson is enlivening. The sergent fellate the carson. If someone whirlpool the carson then the carson is senior. If the shell stoke the conchita and the shell does not see the conchita then the conchita is enlivening. If someone is senior and they chase the shell then the shell fellate the conchita. The carson is senior.", "logic": "\nnot Stoke(shell, conchita)\nnot Fellate(shell, carson)\nScaly(shell)\nEnlivening(shell)\nSenior(shell)\nWhirlpool(shell, carson)\nStoke(conchita, shell)\nFellate(conchita, shell)\nnot Shoddy(conchita)\nWhirlpool(conchita, shell)\nWhirlpool(conchita, carson)\nStoke(carson, shell)\nStoke(carson, conchita)\nnot Stoke(carson, sergent)\nEnlivening(carson)\nFellate(sergent, carson)\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, carson) -> Senior(carson))\nStoke(shell, conchita) and not Whirlpool(shell, conchita) -> Enlivening(conchita)\nforall x (Senior(x) and Stoke(x, shell) -> Fellate(shell, conchita))\n\nSenior(carson)\n\nWhirlpool(conchita, carson) and forall x (Whirlpool(x, carson) -> Senior(carson)) -> therefore Senior(carson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The kellia does not chase the kerrill. The kellia does not eat the dulci. The kellia is haploidic. The kellia is untethered. The kellia is serous. The kellia fare the dulci. The kerrill crepe the kellia. The kerrill guttle the kellia. The kerrill is not adequate. The kerrill fare the kellia. The kerrill fare the dulci. The dulci crepe the kellia. The dulci crepe the kerrill. The dulci does not chase the ethelred. The dulci is untethered. The ethelred guttle the dulci. If someone fare the dulci then the dulci is serous. If the kellia crepe the kerrill and the kellia does not see the kerrill then the kerrill is untethered. If someone is serous and they chase the kellia then the kellia guttle the kerrill. The dulci is not serous.", "logic": "\nnot Crepe(kellia, kerrill)\nnot Guttle(kellia, dulci)\nHaploidic(kellia)\nUntethered(kellia)\nSerous(kellia)\nFare(kellia, dulci)\nCrepe(kerrill, kellia)\nGuttle(kerrill, kellia)\nnot Adequate(kerrill)\nFare(kerrill, kellia)\nFare(kerrill, dulci)\nCrepe(dulci, kellia)\nCrepe(dulci, kerrill)\nnot Crepe(dulci, ethelred)\nUntethered(dulci)\nGuttle(ethelred, dulci)\nforall x (Fare(x, dulci) -> Serous(dulci))\nCrepe(kellia, kerrill) and not Fare(kellia, kerrill) -> Untethered(kerrill)\nforall x (Serous(x) and Crepe(x, kellia) -> Guttle(kellia, kerrill))\n\nnot Serous(dulci)\n\nFare(kerrill, dulci) and forall x (Fare(x, dulci) -> Serous(dulci)) -> therefore Serous(dulci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The ware does not chase the bary. The ware does not eat the kimmy. The ware is bucolic. The ware is unmoving. The ware is nursed. The ware alight the kimmy. The bary prod the ware. The bary quantify the ware. The bary is not rustic. The bary alight the ware. The bary alight the kimmy. The kimmy prod the ware. The kimmy prod the bary. The kimmy does not chase the hettie. The kimmy is unmoving. The hettie quantify the kimmy. If someone alight the kimmy then the kimmy is nursed. If the ware prod the bary and the ware does not see the bary then the bary is unmoving. If someone is nursed and they chase the ware then the ware quantify the bary. The ware quantify the bary.", "logic": "\nnot Prod(ware, bary)\nnot Quantify(ware, kimmy)\nBucolic(ware)\nUnmoving(ware)\nNursed(ware)\nAlight(ware, kimmy)\nProd(bary, ware)\nQuantify(bary, ware)\nnot Rustic(bary)\nAlight(bary, ware)\nAlight(bary, kimmy)\nProd(kimmy, ware)\nProd(kimmy, bary)\nnot Prod(kimmy, hettie)\nUnmoving(kimmy)\nQuantify(hettie, kimmy)\nforall x (Alight(x, kimmy) -> Nursed(kimmy))\nProd(ware, bary) and not Alight(ware, bary) -> Unmoving(bary)\nforall x (Nursed(x) and Prod(x, ware) -> Quantify(ware, bary))\n\nQuantify(ware, bary)\n\nAlight(bary, kimmy) and forall x (Alight(x, kimmy) -> Nursed(kimmy)) -> therefore Nursed(kimmy) Nursed(kimmy) and Prod(kimmy, ware) and forall x (Nursed(x) and Prod(x, ware) -> Quantify(ware, bary)) -> therefore Quantify(ware, bary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The lamar does not chase the bancroft. The lamar does not eat the briggs. The lamar is savourless. The lamar is sectorial. The lamar is confused. The lamar discern the briggs. The bancroft complexion the lamar. The bancroft pother the lamar. The bancroft is not aeonian. The bancroft discern the lamar. The bancroft discern the briggs. The briggs complexion the lamar. The briggs complexion the bancroft. The briggs does not chase the nalani. The briggs is sectorial. The nalani pother the briggs. If someone discern the briggs then the briggs is confused. If the lamar complexion the bancroft and the lamar does not see the bancroft then the bancroft is sectorial. If someone is confused and they chase the lamar then the lamar pother the bancroft. The lamar does not eat the bancroft.", "logic": "\nnot Complexion(lamar, bancroft)\nnot Pother(lamar, briggs)\nSavourless(lamar)\nSectorial(lamar)\nConfused(lamar)\nDiscern(lamar, briggs)\nComplexion(bancroft, lamar)\nPother(bancroft, lamar)\nnot Aeonian(bancroft)\nDiscern(bancroft, lamar)\nDiscern(bancroft, briggs)\nComplexion(briggs, lamar)\nComplexion(briggs, bancroft)\nnot Complexion(briggs, nalani)\nSectorial(briggs)\nPother(nalani, briggs)\nforall x (Discern(x, briggs) -> Confused(briggs))\nComplexion(lamar, bancroft) and not Discern(lamar, bancroft) -> Sectorial(bancroft)\nforall x (Confused(x) and Complexion(x, lamar) -> Pother(lamar, bancroft))\n\nnot Pother(lamar, bancroft)\n\nDiscern(bancroft, briggs) and forall x (Discern(x, briggs) -> Confused(briggs)) -> therefore Confused(briggs) Confused(briggs) and Complexion(briggs, lamar) and forall x (Confused(x) and Complexion(x, lamar) -> Pother(lamar, bancroft)) -> therefore Pother(lamar, bancroft)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The winton does not chase the ainsley. The winton does not eat the jackson. The winton is tiled. The winton is jejune. The winton is kyphotic. The winton freelance the jackson. The ainsley harp the winton. The ainsley ping the winton. The ainsley is not fruiting. The ainsley freelance the winton. The ainsley freelance the jackson. The jackson harp the winton. The jackson harp the ainsley. The jackson does not chase the rodney. The jackson is jejune. The rodney ping the jackson. If someone freelance the jackson then the jackson is kyphotic. If the winton harp the ainsley and the winton does not see the ainsley then the ainsley is jejune. If someone is kyphotic and they chase the winton then the winton ping the ainsley. The ainsley is not jejune.", "logic": "\nnot Harp(winton, ainsley)\nnot Ping(winton, jackson)\nTiled(winton)\nJejune(winton)\nKyphotic(winton)\nFreelance(winton, jackson)\nHarp(ainsley, winton)\nPing(ainsley, winton)\nnot Fruiting(ainsley)\nFreelance(ainsley, winton)\nFreelance(ainsley, jackson)\nHarp(jackson, winton)\nHarp(jackson, ainsley)\nnot Harp(jackson, rodney)\nJejune(jackson)\nPing(rodney, jackson)\nforall x (Freelance(x, jackson) -> Kyphotic(jackson))\nHarp(winton, ainsley) and not Freelance(winton, ainsley) -> Jejune(ainsley)\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) and Harp(x, winton) -> Ping(winton, ainsley))\n\nnot Jejune(ainsley)\n\nHarp(winton, ainsley) and not Freelance(winton, ainsley) -> Jejune(ainsley) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The jane does not chase the katie. The jane does not eat the reid. The jane is convergent. The jane is funky. The jane is sanguine. The jane mortise the reid. The katie marcel the jane. The katie fortify the jane. The katie is not kayoed. The katie mortise the jane. The katie mortise the reid. The reid marcel the jane. The reid marcel the katie. The reid does not chase the walther. The reid is funky. The walther fortify the reid. If someone mortise the reid then the reid is sanguine. If the jane marcel the katie and the jane does not see the katie then the katie is funky. If someone is sanguine and they chase the jane then the jane fortify the katie. The reid is young.", "logic": "\nnot Marcel(jane, katie)\nnot Fortify(jane, reid)\nConvergent(jane)\nFunky(jane)\nSanguine(jane)\nMortise(jane, reid)\nMarcel(katie, jane)\nFortify(katie, jane)\nnot Kayoed(katie)\nMortise(katie, jane)\nMortise(katie, reid)\nMarcel(reid, jane)\nMarcel(reid, katie)\nnot Marcel(reid, walther)\nFunky(reid)\nFortify(walther, reid)\nforall x (Mortise(x, reid) -> Sanguine(reid))\nMarcel(jane, katie) and not Mortise(jane, katie) -> Funky(katie)\nforall x (Sanguine(x) and Marcel(x, jane) -> Fortify(jane, katie))\n\nYoung(reid)\n\nYoung(reid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The rebeca does not chase the englebert. The rebeca does not eat the daria. The rebeca is pucka. The rebeca is raging. The rebeca is stimulant. The rebeca blub the daria. The englebert labialize the rebeca. The englebert carpenter the rebeca. The englebert is not unselected. The englebert blub the rebeca. The englebert blub the daria. The daria labialize the rebeca. The daria labialize the englebert. The daria does not chase the sargent. The daria is raging. The sargent carpenter the daria. If someone blub the daria then the daria is stimulant. If the rebeca labialize the englebert and the rebeca does not see the englebert then the englebert is raging. If someone is stimulant and they chase the rebeca then the rebeca carpenter the englebert. The englebert does not see the englebert.", "logic": "\nnot Labialize(rebeca, englebert)\nnot Carpenter(rebeca, daria)\nPucka(rebeca)\nRaging(rebeca)\nStimulant(rebeca)\nBlub(rebeca, daria)\nLabialize(englebert, rebeca)\nCarpenter(englebert, rebeca)\nnot Unselected(englebert)\nBlub(englebert, rebeca)\nBlub(englebert, daria)\nLabialize(daria, rebeca)\nLabialize(daria, englebert)\nnot Labialize(daria, sargent)\nRaging(daria)\nCarpenter(sargent, daria)\nforall x (Blub(x, daria) -> Stimulant(daria))\nLabialize(rebeca, englebert) and not Blub(rebeca, englebert) -> Raging(englebert)\nforall x (Stimulant(x) and Labialize(x, rebeca) -> Carpenter(rebeca, englebert))\n\nnot Blub(englebert, englebert)\n\nnot Blub(englebert, englebert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The becky does not chase the aridatha. The becky does not eat the remy. The becky is lobular. The becky is evident. The becky is genital. The becky solicit the remy. The aridatha laud the becky. The aridatha dandify the becky. The aridatha is not minimized. The aridatha solicit the becky. The aridatha solicit the remy. The remy laud the becky. The remy laud the aridatha. The remy does not chase the theresina. The remy is evident. The theresina dandify the remy. If someone solicit the remy then the remy is genital. If the becky laud the aridatha and the becky does not see the aridatha then the aridatha is evident. If someone is genital and they chase the becky then the becky dandify the aridatha. The remy solicit the remy.", "logic": "\nnot Laud(becky, aridatha)\nnot Dandify(becky, remy)\nLobular(becky)\nEvident(becky)\nGenital(becky)\nSolicit(becky, remy)\nLaud(aridatha, becky)\nDandify(aridatha, becky)\nnot Minimized(aridatha)\nSolicit(aridatha, becky)\nSolicit(aridatha, remy)\nLaud(remy, becky)\nLaud(remy, aridatha)\nnot Laud(remy, theresina)\nEvident(remy)\nDandify(theresina, remy)\nforall x (Solicit(x, remy) -> Genital(remy))\nLaud(becky, aridatha) and not Solicit(becky, aridatha) -> Evident(aridatha)\nforall x (Genital(x) and Laud(x, becky) -> Dandify(becky, aridatha))\n\nSolicit(remy, remy)\n\nSolicit(remy, remy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The liora does not chase the linzy. The liora does not eat the ernest. The liora is unwedded. The liora is urbanised. The liora is pleasing. The liora innervate the ernest. The linzy overarch the liora. The linzy loathe the liora. The linzy is not idiotic. The linzy innervate the liora. The linzy innervate the ernest. The ernest overarch the liora. The ernest overarch the linzy. The ernest does not chase the helise. The ernest is urbanised. The helise loathe the ernest. If someone innervate the ernest then the ernest is pleasing. If the liora overarch the linzy and the liora does not see the linzy then the linzy is urbanised. If someone is pleasing and they chase the liora then the liora loathe the linzy. The helise is not unwedded.", "logic": "\nnot Overarch(liora, linzy)\nnot Loathe(liora, ernest)\nUnwedded(liora)\nUrbanised(liora)\nPleasing(liora)\nInnervate(liora, ernest)\nOverarch(linzy, liora)\nLoathe(linzy, liora)\nnot Idiotic(linzy)\nInnervate(linzy, liora)\nInnervate(linzy, ernest)\nOverarch(ernest, liora)\nOverarch(ernest, linzy)\nnot Overarch(ernest, helise)\nUrbanised(ernest)\nLoathe(helise, ernest)\nforall x (Innervate(x, ernest) -> Pleasing(ernest))\nOverarch(liora, linzy) and not Innervate(liora, linzy) -> Urbanised(linzy)\nforall x (Pleasing(x) and Overarch(x, liora) -> Loathe(liora, linzy))\n\nnot Unwedded(helise)\n\nnot Unwedded(helise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The michaella does not chase the marcia. The michaella does not eat the roana. The michaella is ingrown. The michaella is anguished. The michaella is altissimo. The michaella sulk the roana. The marcia retract the michaella. The marcia ware the michaella. The marcia is not ninety. The marcia sulk the michaella. The marcia sulk the roana. The roana retract the michaella. The roana retract the marcia. The roana does not chase the josephina. The roana is anguished. The josephina ware the roana. If someone sulk the roana then the roana is altissimo. If the michaella retract the marcia and the michaella does not see the marcia then the marcia is anguished. If someone is altissimo and they chase the michaella then the michaella ware the marcia. The josephina is young.", "logic": "\nnot Retract(michaella, marcia)\nnot Ware(michaella, roana)\nIngrown(michaella)\nAnguished(michaella)\nAltissimo(michaella)\nSulk(michaella, roana)\nRetract(marcia, michaella)\nWare(marcia, michaella)\nnot Ninety(marcia)\nSulk(marcia, michaella)\nSulk(marcia, roana)\nRetract(roana, michaella)\nRetract(roana, marcia)\nnot Retract(roana, josephina)\nAnguished(roana)\nWare(josephina, roana)\nforall x (Sulk(x, roana) -> Altissimo(roana))\nRetract(michaella, marcia) and not Sulk(michaella, marcia) -> Anguished(marcia)\nforall x (Altissimo(x) and Retract(x, michaella) -> Ware(michaella, marcia))\n\nYoung(josephina)\n\nYoung(josephina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1037"} {"premises": "The corabella is not bended. The corabella pour the vonni. The corabella slumber the vonni. The corabella surrender the hazel. The hazel is acaudal. The hazel is unbound. The hazel slumber the corabella. The hazel surrender the corabella. The hazel surrender the vonni. The vonni is maggoty. The vonni is depilatory. The vonni is unbound. The vonni pour the hazel. The vonni surrender the corabella. The vonni surrender the hazel. All unbound people are maggoty. If someone is unbound and depilatory then they need the corabella. If the vonni slumber the corabella then the vonni slumber the hazel. If someone surrender the vonni and they are not bended then the vonni surrender the corabella. If the hazel surrender the corabella and the hazel pour the corabella then the hazel does not need the corabella. If someone slumber the vonni then the vonni is maggoty. If someone is acaudal and they do not need the hazel then the hazel slumber the vonni. If someone is acaudal and they do not need the hazel then the hazel pour the vonni. The vonni surrender the corabella.", "logic": "\nnot Bended(corabella)\nPour(corabella, vonni)\nSlumber(corabella, vonni)\nSurrender(corabella, hazel)\nAcaudal(hazel)\nUnbound(hazel)\nSlumber(hazel, corabella)\nSurrender(hazel, corabella)\nSurrender(hazel, vonni)\nMaggoty(vonni)\nDepilatory(vonni)\nUnbound(vonni)\nPour(vonni, hazel)\nSurrender(vonni, corabella)\nSurrender(vonni, hazel)\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) and Depilatory(x) -> Slumber(x, corabella))\nSlumber(vonni, corabella) -> Slumber(vonni, hazel)\nforall x (Surrender(x, vonni) and not Bended(x) -> Surrender(vonni, corabella))\nSurrender(hazel, corabella) and Pour(hazel, corabella) -> not Slumber(hazel, corabella)\nforall x (Slumber(x, vonni) -> Maggoty(vonni))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) and not Slumber(x, hazel) -> Slumber(hazel, vonni))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) and not Slumber(x, hazel) -> Pour(hazel, vonni))\n\nSurrender(vonni, corabella)\n\ntherefore Surrender(vonni, corabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The moyra is not heartsick. The moyra bully the glenine. The moyra gnarl the glenine. The moyra cheque the zeb. The zeb is flowerless. The zeb is morganatic. The zeb gnarl the moyra. The zeb cheque the moyra. The zeb cheque the glenine. The glenine is indistinct. The glenine is base. The glenine is morganatic. The glenine bully the zeb. The glenine cheque the moyra. The glenine cheque the zeb. All morganatic people are indistinct. If someone is morganatic and base then they need the moyra. If the glenine gnarl the moyra then the glenine gnarl the zeb. If someone cheque the glenine and they are not heartsick then the glenine cheque the moyra. If the zeb cheque the moyra and the zeb bully the moyra then the zeb does not need the moyra. If someone gnarl the glenine then the glenine is indistinct. If someone is flowerless and they do not need the zeb then the zeb gnarl the glenine. If someone is flowerless and they do not need the zeb then the zeb bully the glenine. The glenine does not see the moyra.", "logic": "\nnot Heartsick(moyra)\nBully(moyra, glenine)\nGnarl(moyra, glenine)\nCheque(moyra, zeb)\nFlowerless(zeb)\nMorganatic(zeb)\nGnarl(zeb, moyra)\nCheque(zeb, moyra)\nCheque(zeb, glenine)\nIndistinct(glenine)\nBase(glenine)\nMorganatic(glenine)\nBully(glenine, zeb)\nCheque(glenine, moyra)\nCheque(glenine, zeb)\nforall x (Morganatic(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) and Base(x) -> Gnarl(x, moyra))\nGnarl(glenine, moyra) -> Gnarl(glenine, zeb)\nforall x (Cheque(x, glenine) and not Heartsick(x) -> Cheque(glenine, moyra))\nCheque(zeb, moyra) and Bully(zeb, moyra) -> not Gnarl(zeb, moyra)\nforall x (Gnarl(x, glenine) -> Indistinct(glenine))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) and not Gnarl(x, zeb) -> Gnarl(zeb, glenine))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) and not Gnarl(x, zeb) -> Bully(zeb, glenine))\n\nnot Cheque(glenine, moyra)\n\ntherefore Cheque(glenine, moyra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The joao is not deserted. The joao twitch the corry. The joao bode the corry. The joao disgrace the margalit. The margalit is carangid. The margalit is nonextant. The margalit bode the joao. The margalit disgrace the joao. The margalit disgrace the corry. The corry is bedaubed. The corry is trojan. The corry is nonextant. The corry twitch the margalit. The corry disgrace the joao. The corry disgrace the margalit. All nonextant people are bedaubed. If someone is nonextant and trojan then they need the joao. If the corry bode the joao then the corry bode the margalit. If someone disgrace the corry and they are not deserted then the corry disgrace the joao. If the margalit disgrace the joao and the margalit twitch the joao then the margalit does not need the joao. If someone bode the corry then the corry is bedaubed. If someone is carangid and they do not need the margalit then the margalit bode the corry. If someone is carangid and they do not need the margalit then the margalit twitch the corry. The margalit is bedaubed.", "logic": "\nnot Deserted(joao)\nTwitch(joao, corry)\nBode(joao, corry)\nDisgrace(joao, margalit)\nCarangid(margalit)\nNonextant(margalit)\nBode(margalit, joao)\nDisgrace(margalit, joao)\nDisgrace(margalit, corry)\nBedaubed(corry)\nTrojan(corry)\nNonextant(corry)\nTwitch(corry, margalit)\nDisgrace(corry, joao)\nDisgrace(corry, margalit)\nforall x (Nonextant(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Nonextant(x) and Trojan(x) -> Bode(x, joao))\nBode(corry, joao) -> Bode(corry, margalit)\nforall x (Disgrace(x, corry) and not Deserted(x) -> Disgrace(corry, joao))\nDisgrace(margalit, joao) and Twitch(margalit, joao) -> not Bode(margalit, joao)\nforall x (Bode(x, corry) -> Bedaubed(corry))\nforall x (Carangid(x) and not Bode(x, margalit) -> Bode(margalit, corry))\nforall x (Carangid(x) and not Bode(x, margalit) -> Twitch(margalit, corry))\n\nBedaubed(margalit)\n\nNonextant(margalit) and forall x (Nonextant(x) -> Bedaubed(x)) -> therefore Bedaubed(margalit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The belia is not mendacious. The belia forego the josefina. The belia lave the josefina. The belia spacewalk the parrnell. The parrnell is yogic. The parrnell is atheist. The parrnell lave the belia. The parrnell spacewalk the belia. The parrnell spacewalk the josefina. The josefina is stocked. The josefina is thinkable. The josefina is atheist. The josefina forego the parrnell. The josefina spacewalk the belia. The josefina spacewalk the parrnell. All atheist people are stocked. If someone is atheist and thinkable then they need the belia. If the josefina lave the belia then the josefina lave the parrnell. If someone spacewalk the josefina and they are not mendacious then the josefina spacewalk the belia. If the parrnell spacewalk the belia and the parrnell forego the belia then the parrnell does not need the belia. If someone lave the josefina then the josefina is stocked. If someone is yogic and they do not need the parrnell then the parrnell lave the josefina. If someone is yogic and they do not need the parrnell then the parrnell forego the josefina. The josefina does not need the belia.", "logic": "\nnot Mendacious(belia)\nForego(belia, josefina)\nLave(belia, josefina)\nSpacewalk(belia, parrnell)\nYogic(parrnell)\nAtheist(parrnell)\nLave(parrnell, belia)\nSpacewalk(parrnell, belia)\nSpacewalk(parrnell, josefina)\nStocked(josefina)\nThinkable(josefina)\nAtheist(josefina)\nForego(josefina, parrnell)\nSpacewalk(josefina, belia)\nSpacewalk(josefina, parrnell)\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Stocked(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) and Thinkable(x) -> Lave(x, belia))\nLave(josefina, belia) -> Lave(josefina, parrnell)\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, josefina) and not Mendacious(x) -> Spacewalk(josefina, belia))\nSpacewalk(parrnell, belia) and Forego(parrnell, belia) -> not Lave(parrnell, belia)\nforall x (Lave(x, josefina) -> Stocked(josefina))\nforall x (Yogic(x) and not Lave(x, parrnell) -> Lave(parrnell, josefina))\nforall x (Yogic(x) and not Lave(x, parrnell) -> Forego(parrnell, josefina))\n\nnot Lave(josefina, belia)\n\nAtheist(josefina) and Thinkable(josefina) and forall x (Atheist(x) and Thinkable(x) -> Lave(x, belia)) -> therefore Lave(josefina, belia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The merell is not retired. The merell uplift the hamlet. The merell whale the hamlet. The merell shadow the selene. The selene is subclavian. The selene is mauritian. The selene whale the merell. The selene shadow the merell. The selene shadow the hamlet. The hamlet is diffusing. The hamlet is antecedent. The hamlet is mauritian. The hamlet uplift the selene. The hamlet shadow the merell. The hamlet shadow the selene. All mauritian people are diffusing. If someone is mauritian and antecedent then they need the merell. If the hamlet whale the merell then the hamlet whale the selene. If someone shadow the hamlet and they are not retired then the hamlet shadow the merell. If the selene shadow the merell and the selene uplift the merell then the selene does not need the merell. If someone whale the hamlet then the hamlet is diffusing. If someone is subclavian and they do not need the selene then the selene whale the hamlet. If someone is subclavian and they do not need the selene then the selene uplift the hamlet. The hamlet whale the selene.", "logic": "\nnot Retired(merell)\nUplift(merell, hamlet)\nWhale(merell, hamlet)\nShadow(merell, selene)\nSubclavian(selene)\nMauritian(selene)\nWhale(selene, merell)\nShadow(selene, merell)\nShadow(selene, hamlet)\nDiffusing(hamlet)\nAntecedent(hamlet)\nMauritian(hamlet)\nUplift(hamlet, selene)\nShadow(hamlet, merell)\nShadow(hamlet, selene)\nforall x (Mauritian(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nforall x (Mauritian(x) and Antecedent(x) -> Whale(x, merell))\nWhale(hamlet, merell) -> Whale(hamlet, selene)\nforall x (Shadow(x, hamlet) and not Retired(x) -> Shadow(hamlet, merell))\nShadow(selene, merell) and Uplift(selene, merell) -> not Whale(selene, merell)\nforall x (Whale(x, hamlet) -> Diffusing(hamlet))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) and not Whale(x, selene) -> Whale(selene, hamlet))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) and not Whale(x, selene) -> Uplift(selene, hamlet))\n\nWhale(hamlet, selene)\n\nMauritian(hamlet) and Antecedent(hamlet) and forall x (Mauritian(x) and Antecedent(x) -> Whale(x, merell)) -> therefore Whale(hamlet, merell) Whale(hamlet, merell) and Whale(hamlet, merell) -> Whale(hamlet, selene) -> therefore Whale(hamlet, selene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The guenevere is not surgical. The guenevere loan the dorris. The guenevere vitalize the dorris. The guenevere rethink the rozella. The rozella is bold. The rozella is sensitized. The rozella vitalize the guenevere. The rozella rethink the guenevere. The rozella rethink the dorris. The dorris is nonstick. The dorris is unbalanced. The dorris is sensitized. The dorris loan the rozella. The dorris rethink the guenevere. The dorris rethink the rozella. All sensitized people are nonstick. If someone is sensitized and unbalanced then they need the guenevere. If the dorris vitalize the guenevere then the dorris vitalize the rozella. If someone rethink the dorris and they are not surgical then the dorris rethink the guenevere. If the rozella rethink the guenevere and the rozella loan the guenevere then the rozella does not need the guenevere. If someone vitalize the dorris then the dorris is nonstick. If someone is bold and they do not need the rozella then the rozella vitalize the dorris. If someone is bold and they do not need the rozella then the rozella loan the dorris. The dorris does not need the rozella.", "logic": "\nnot Surgical(guenevere)\nLoan(guenevere, dorris)\nVitalize(guenevere, dorris)\nRethink(guenevere, rozella)\nBold(rozella)\nSensitized(rozella)\nVitalize(rozella, guenevere)\nRethink(rozella, guenevere)\nRethink(rozella, dorris)\nNonstick(dorris)\nUnbalanced(dorris)\nSensitized(dorris)\nLoan(dorris, rozella)\nRethink(dorris, guenevere)\nRethink(dorris, rozella)\nforall x (Sensitized(x) -> Nonstick(x))\nforall x (Sensitized(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Vitalize(x, guenevere))\nVitalize(dorris, guenevere) -> Vitalize(dorris, rozella)\nforall x (Rethink(x, dorris) and not Surgical(x) -> Rethink(dorris, guenevere))\nRethink(rozella, guenevere) and Loan(rozella, guenevere) -> not Vitalize(rozella, guenevere)\nforall x (Vitalize(x, dorris) -> Nonstick(dorris))\nforall x (Bold(x) and not Vitalize(x, rozella) -> Vitalize(rozella, dorris))\nforall x (Bold(x) and not Vitalize(x, rozella) -> Loan(rozella, dorris))\n\nnot Vitalize(dorris, rozella)\n\nSensitized(dorris) and Unbalanced(dorris) and forall x (Sensitized(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Vitalize(x, guenevere)) -> therefore Vitalize(dorris, guenevere) Vitalize(dorris, guenevere) and Vitalize(dorris, guenevere) -> Vitalize(dorris, rozella) -> therefore Vitalize(dorris, rozella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The jared is not watchful. The jared sluice the corissa. The jared slave the corissa. The jared overlie the thea. The thea is unmingled. The thea is sapphic. The thea slave the jared. The thea overlie the jared. The thea overlie the corissa. The corissa is leprose. The corissa is infective. The corissa is sapphic. The corissa sluice the thea. The corissa overlie the jared. The corissa overlie the thea. All sapphic people are leprose. If someone is sapphic and infective then they need the jared. If the corissa slave the jared then the corissa slave the thea. If someone overlie the corissa and they are not watchful then the corissa overlie the jared. If the thea overlie the jared and the thea sluice the jared then the thea does not need the jared. If someone slave the corissa then the corissa is leprose. If someone is unmingled and they do not need the thea then the thea slave the corissa. If someone is unmingled and they do not need the thea then the thea sluice the corissa. The jared does not need the jared.", "logic": "\nnot Watchful(jared)\nSluice(jared, corissa)\nSlave(jared, corissa)\nOverlie(jared, thea)\nUnmingled(thea)\nSapphic(thea)\nSlave(thea, jared)\nOverlie(thea, jared)\nOverlie(thea, corissa)\nLeprose(corissa)\nInfective(corissa)\nSapphic(corissa)\nSluice(corissa, thea)\nOverlie(corissa, jared)\nOverlie(corissa, thea)\nforall x (Sapphic(x) -> Leprose(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Infective(x) -> Slave(x, jared))\nSlave(corissa, jared) -> Slave(corissa, thea)\nforall x (Overlie(x, corissa) and not Watchful(x) -> Overlie(corissa, jared))\nOverlie(thea, jared) and Sluice(thea, jared) -> not Slave(thea, jared)\nforall x (Slave(x, corissa) -> Leprose(corissa))\nforall x (Unmingled(x) and not Slave(x, thea) -> Slave(thea, corissa))\nforall x (Unmingled(x) and not Slave(x, thea) -> Sluice(thea, corissa))\n\nnot Slave(jared, jared)\n\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Infective(x) -> Slave(x, jared)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The kaitlyn is not favorable. The kaitlyn deodorise the alida. The kaitlyn gauge the alida. The kaitlyn franchise the ola. The ola is barren. The ola is broadband. The ola gauge the kaitlyn. The ola franchise the kaitlyn. The ola franchise the alida. The alida is jawless. The alida is outlaw. The alida is broadband. The alida deodorise the ola. The alida franchise the kaitlyn. The alida franchise the ola. All broadband people are jawless. If someone is broadband and outlaw then they need the kaitlyn. If the alida gauge the kaitlyn then the alida gauge the ola. If someone franchise the alida and they are not favorable then the alida franchise the kaitlyn. If the ola franchise the kaitlyn and the ola deodorise the kaitlyn then the ola does not need the kaitlyn. If someone gauge the alida then the alida is jawless. If someone is barren and they do not need the ola then the ola gauge the alida. If someone is barren and they do not need the ola then the ola deodorise the alida. The ola gauge the alida.", "logic": "\nnot Favorable(kaitlyn)\nDeodorise(kaitlyn, alida)\nGauge(kaitlyn, alida)\nFranchise(kaitlyn, ola)\nBarren(ola)\nBroadband(ola)\nGauge(ola, kaitlyn)\nFranchise(ola, kaitlyn)\nFranchise(ola, alida)\nJawless(alida)\nOutlaw(alida)\nBroadband(alida)\nDeodorise(alida, ola)\nFranchise(alida, kaitlyn)\nFranchise(alida, ola)\nforall x (Broadband(x) -> Jawless(x))\nforall x (Broadband(x) and Outlaw(x) -> Gauge(x, kaitlyn))\nGauge(alida, kaitlyn) -> Gauge(alida, ola)\nforall x (Franchise(x, alida) and not Favorable(x) -> Franchise(alida, kaitlyn))\nFranchise(ola, kaitlyn) and Deodorise(ola, kaitlyn) -> not Gauge(ola, kaitlyn)\nforall x (Gauge(x, alida) -> Jawless(alida))\nforall x (Barren(x) and not Gauge(x, ola) -> Gauge(ola, alida))\nforall x (Barren(x) and not Gauge(x, ola) -> Deodorise(ola, alida))\n\nGauge(ola, alida)\n\nforall x (Barren(x) and not Gauge(x, ola) -> Gauge(ola, alida)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The jeraldine is not benefic. The jeraldine point the lesley. The jeraldine bill the lesley. The jeraldine clothe the gill. The gill is meddling. The gill is generic. The gill bill the jeraldine. The gill clothe the jeraldine. The gill clothe the lesley. The lesley is sizeable. The lesley is formative. The lesley is generic. The lesley point the gill. The lesley clothe the jeraldine. The lesley clothe the gill. All generic people are sizeable. If someone is generic and formative then they need the jeraldine. If the lesley bill the jeraldine then the lesley bill the gill. If someone clothe the lesley and they are not benefic then the lesley clothe the jeraldine. If the gill clothe the jeraldine and the gill point the jeraldine then the gill does not need the jeraldine. If someone bill the lesley then the lesley is sizeable. If someone is meddling and they do not need the gill then the gill bill the lesley. If someone is meddling and they do not need the gill then the gill point the lesley. The jeraldine is not sizeable.", "logic": "\nnot Benefic(jeraldine)\nPoint(jeraldine, lesley)\nBill(jeraldine, lesley)\nClothe(jeraldine, gill)\nMeddling(gill)\nGeneric(gill)\nBill(gill, jeraldine)\nClothe(gill, jeraldine)\nClothe(gill, lesley)\nSizeable(lesley)\nFormative(lesley)\nGeneric(lesley)\nPoint(lesley, gill)\nClothe(lesley, jeraldine)\nClothe(lesley, gill)\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Sizeable(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) and Formative(x) -> Bill(x, jeraldine))\nBill(lesley, jeraldine) -> Bill(lesley, gill)\nforall x (Clothe(x, lesley) and not Benefic(x) -> Clothe(lesley, jeraldine))\nClothe(gill, jeraldine) and Point(gill, jeraldine) -> not Bill(gill, jeraldine)\nforall x (Bill(x, lesley) -> Sizeable(lesley))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and not Bill(x, gill) -> Bill(gill, lesley))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and not Bill(x, gill) -> Point(gill, lesley))\n\nnot Sizeable(jeraldine)\n\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Sizeable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The appolonia is not minimized. The appolonia carpet the hugh. The appolonia smooch the hugh. The appolonia idolize the nicole. The nicole is pessimal. The nicole is rudderless. The nicole smooch the appolonia. The nicole idolize the appolonia. The nicole idolize the hugh. The hugh is anopheline. The hugh is sorcerous. The hugh is rudderless. The hugh carpet the nicole. The hugh idolize the appolonia. The hugh idolize the nicole. All rudderless people are anopheline. If someone is rudderless and sorcerous then they need the appolonia. If the hugh smooch the appolonia then the hugh smooch the nicole. If someone idolize the hugh and they are not minimized then the hugh idolize the appolonia. If the nicole idolize the appolonia and the nicole carpet the appolonia then the nicole does not need the appolonia. If someone smooch the hugh then the hugh is anopheline. If someone is pessimal and they do not need the nicole then the nicole smooch the hugh. If someone is pessimal and they do not need the nicole then the nicole carpet the hugh. The appolonia is pessimal.", "logic": "\nnot Minimized(appolonia)\nCarpet(appolonia, hugh)\nSmooch(appolonia, hugh)\nIdolize(appolonia, nicole)\nPessimal(nicole)\nRudderless(nicole)\nSmooch(nicole, appolonia)\nIdolize(nicole, appolonia)\nIdolize(nicole, hugh)\nAnopheline(hugh)\nSorcerous(hugh)\nRudderless(hugh)\nCarpet(hugh, nicole)\nIdolize(hugh, appolonia)\nIdolize(hugh, nicole)\nforall x (Rudderless(x) -> Anopheline(x))\nforall x (Rudderless(x) and Sorcerous(x) -> Smooch(x, appolonia))\nSmooch(hugh, appolonia) -> Smooch(hugh, nicole)\nforall x (Idolize(x, hugh) and not Minimized(x) -> Idolize(hugh, appolonia))\nIdolize(nicole, appolonia) and Carpet(nicole, appolonia) -> not Smooch(nicole, appolonia)\nforall x (Smooch(x, hugh) -> Anopheline(hugh))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and not Smooch(x, nicole) -> Smooch(nicole, hugh))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and not Smooch(x, nicole) -> Carpet(nicole, hugh))\n\nPessimal(appolonia)\n\nPessimal(appolonia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The rawley is not earnest. The rawley succeed the harvard. The rawley honk the harvard. The rawley degrade the fulvia. The fulvia is ibsenian. The fulvia is unrevealed. The fulvia honk the rawley. The fulvia degrade the rawley. The fulvia degrade the harvard. The harvard is painless. The harvard is western. The harvard is unrevealed. The harvard succeed the fulvia. The harvard degrade the rawley. The harvard degrade the fulvia. All unrevealed people are painless. If someone is unrevealed and western then they need the rawley. If the harvard honk the rawley then the harvard honk the fulvia. If someone degrade the harvard and they are not earnest then the harvard degrade the rawley. If the fulvia degrade the rawley and the fulvia succeed the rawley then the fulvia does not need the rawley. If someone honk the harvard then the harvard is painless. If someone is ibsenian and they do not need the fulvia then the fulvia honk the harvard. If someone is ibsenian and they do not need the fulvia then the fulvia succeed the harvard. The rawley does not like the fulvia.", "logic": "\nnot Earnest(rawley)\nSucceed(rawley, harvard)\nHonk(rawley, harvard)\nDegrade(rawley, fulvia)\nIbsenian(fulvia)\nUnrevealed(fulvia)\nHonk(fulvia, rawley)\nDegrade(fulvia, rawley)\nDegrade(fulvia, harvard)\nPainless(harvard)\nWestern(harvard)\nUnrevealed(harvard)\nSucceed(harvard, fulvia)\nDegrade(harvard, rawley)\nDegrade(harvard, fulvia)\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Painless(x))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) and Western(x) -> Honk(x, rawley))\nHonk(harvard, rawley) -> Honk(harvard, fulvia)\nforall x (Degrade(x, harvard) and not Earnest(x) -> Degrade(harvard, rawley))\nDegrade(fulvia, rawley) and Succeed(fulvia, rawley) -> not Honk(fulvia, rawley)\nforall x (Honk(x, harvard) -> Painless(harvard))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) and not Honk(x, fulvia) -> Honk(fulvia, harvard))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) and not Honk(x, fulvia) -> Succeed(fulvia, harvard))\n\nnot Succeed(rawley, fulvia)\n\nnot Succeed(rawley, fulvia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "The kial is not plutonic. The kial juggle the karim. The kial buckle the karim. The kial rebuild the nydia. The nydia is cliched. The nydia is propellent. The nydia buckle the kial. The nydia rebuild the kial. The nydia rebuild the karim. The karim is homing. The karim is shakable. The karim is propellent. The karim juggle the nydia. The karim rebuild the kial. The karim rebuild the nydia. All propellent people are homing. If someone is propellent and shakable then they need the kial. If the karim buckle the kial then the karim buckle the nydia. If someone rebuild the karim and they are not plutonic then the karim rebuild the kial. If the nydia rebuild the kial and the nydia juggle the kial then the nydia does not need the kial. If someone buckle the karim then the karim is homing. If someone is cliched and they do not need the nydia then the nydia buckle the karim. If someone is cliched and they do not need the nydia then the nydia juggle the karim. The kial is propellent.", "logic": "\nnot Plutonic(kial)\nJuggle(kial, karim)\nBuckle(kial, karim)\nRebuild(kial, nydia)\nCliched(nydia)\nPropellent(nydia)\nBuckle(nydia, kial)\nRebuild(nydia, kial)\nRebuild(nydia, karim)\nHoming(karim)\nShakable(karim)\nPropellent(karim)\nJuggle(karim, nydia)\nRebuild(karim, kial)\nRebuild(karim, nydia)\nforall x (Propellent(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Shakable(x) -> Buckle(x, kial))\nBuckle(karim, kial) -> Buckle(karim, nydia)\nforall x (Rebuild(x, karim) and not Plutonic(x) -> Rebuild(karim, kial))\nRebuild(nydia, kial) and Juggle(nydia, kial) -> not Buckle(nydia, kial)\nforall x (Buckle(x, karim) -> Homing(karim))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and not Buckle(x, nydia) -> Buckle(nydia, karim))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and not Buckle(x, nydia) -> Juggle(nydia, karim))\n\nPropellent(kial)\n\nPropellent(kial) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-872"} {"premises": "Graig is allotropic. Graig is reticular. Hephzibah is allotropic. Hephzibah is convincing. Hephzibah is archaean. Hephzibah is thumbed. Hephzibah is reticular. If Hephzibah is uncaulked then Hephzibah is not archaean. If someone is archaean then they are allotropic. If Graig is allotropic then Graig is archaean. If Graig is allotropic and Graig is archaean then Graig is uncaulked. If someone is convincing then they are thumbed. If someone is convincing and not archaean then they are thumbed. Graig is reticular.", "logic": "\nAllotropic(graig)\nReticular(graig)\nAllotropic(hephzibah)\nConvincing(hephzibah)\nArchaean(hephzibah)\nThumbed(hephzibah)\nReticular(hephzibah)\nUncaulked(hephzibah) -> not Archaean(hephzibah)\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Allotropic(x))\nAllotropic(graig) -> Archaean(graig)\nAllotropic(graig) and Archaean(graig) -> Uncaulked(graig)\nforall x (Convincing(x) -> Thumbed(x))\nforall x (Convincing(x) and not Archaean(x) -> Thumbed(x))\n\nReticular(graig)\n\ntherefore Reticular(graig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Corie is yummy. Corie is reprobate. Elladine is yummy. Elladine is halal. Elladine is squelched. Elladine is trepid. Elladine is reprobate. If Elladine is sneezy then Elladine is not squelched. If someone is squelched then they are yummy. If Corie is yummy then Corie is squelched. If Corie is yummy and Corie is squelched then Corie is sneezy. If someone is halal then they are trepid. If someone is halal and not squelched then they are trepid. Elladine is not squelched.", "logic": "\nYummy(corie)\nReprobate(corie)\nYummy(elladine)\nHalal(elladine)\nSquelched(elladine)\nTrepid(elladine)\nReprobate(elladine)\nSneezy(elladine) -> not Squelched(elladine)\nforall x (Squelched(x) -> Yummy(x))\nYummy(corie) -> Squelched(corie)\nYummy(corie) and Squelched(corie) -> Sneezy(corie)\nforall x (Halal(x) -> Trepid(x))\nforall x (Halal(x) and not Squelched(x) -> Trepid(x))\n\nnot Squelched(elladine)\n\ntherefore Squelched(elladine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Zak is occlusive. Zak is icteric. Kirbee is occlusive. Kirbee is resolved. Kirbee is breeding. Kirbee is couchant. Kirbee is icteric. If Kirbee is welsh then Kirbee is not breeding. If someone is breeding then they are occlusive. If Zak is occlusive then Zak is breeding. If Zak is occlusive and Zak is breeding then Zak is welsh. If someone is resolved then they are couchant. If someone is resolved and not breeding then they are couchant. Zak is breeding.", "logic": "\nOcclusive(zak)\nIcteric(zak)\nOcclusive(kirbee)\nResolved(kirbee)\nBreeding(kirbee)\nCouchant(kirbee)\nIcteric(kirbee)\nWelsh(kirbee) -> not Breeding(kirbee)\nforall x (Breeding(x) -> Occlusive(x))\nOcclusive(zak) -> Breeding(zak)\nOcclusive(zak) and Breeding(zak) -> Welsh(zak)\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Couchant(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) and not Breeding(x) -> Couchant(x))\n\nBreeding(zak)\n\nOcclusive(zak) and Occlusive(zak) -> Breeding(zak) -> therefore Breeding(zak)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Nunzio is mantled. Nunzio is temporary. Rhonda is mantled. Rhonda is chockful. Rhonda is chaldean. Rhonda is bespoke. Rhonda is temporary. If Rhonda is amnic then Rhonda is not chaldean. If someone is chaldean then they are mantled. If Nunzio is mantled then Nunzio is chaldean. If Nunzio is mantled and Nunzio is chaldean then Nunzio is amnic. If someone is chockful then they are bespoke. If someone is chockful and not chaldean then they are bespoke. Nunzio is not chaldean.", "logic": "\nMantled(nunzio)\nTemporary(nunzio)\nMantled(rhonda)\nChockful(rhonda)\nChaldean(rhonda)\nBespoke(rhonda)\nTemporary(rhonda)\nAmnic(rhonda) -> not Chaldean(rhonda)\nforall x (Chaldean(x) -> Mantled(x))\nMantled(nunzio) -> Chaldean(nunzio)\nMantled(nunzio) and Chaldean(nunzio) -> Amnic(nunzio)\nforall x (Chockful(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nforall x (Chockful(x) and not Chaldean(x) -> Bespoke(x))\n\nnot Chaldean(nunzio)\n\nMantled(nunzio) and Mantled(nunzio) -> Chaldean(nunzio) -> therefore Chaldean(nunzio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Teodoor is executive. Teodoor is triangular. Cam is executive. Cam is ammoniated. Cam is dissonant. Cam is outmost. Cam is triangular. If Cam is eutherian then Cam is not dissonant. If someone is dissonant then they are executive. If Teodoor is executive then Teodoor is dissonant. If Teodoor is executive and Teodoor is dissonant then Teodoor is eutherian. If someone is ammoniated then they are outmost. If someone is ammoniated and not dissonant then they are outmost. Teodoor is eutherian.", "logic": "\nExecutive(teodoor)\nTriangular(teodoor)\nExecutive(cam)\nAmmoniated(cam)\nDissonant(cam)\nOutmost(cam)\nTriangular(cam)\nEutherian(cam) -> not Dissonant(cam)\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Executive(x))\nExecutive(teodoor) -> Dissonant(teodoor)\nExecutive(teodoor) and Dissonant(teodoor) -> Eutherian(teodoor)\nforall x (Ammoniated(x) -> Outmost(x))\nforall x (Ammoniated(x) and not Dissonant(x) -> Outmost(x))\n\nEutherian(teodoor)\n\nExecutive(teodoor) and Executive(teodoor) -> Dissonant(teodoor) -> therefore Dissonant(teodoor) Executive(teodoor) and Dissonant(teodoor) and Executive(teodoor) and Dissonant(teodoor) -> Eutherian(teodoor) -> therefore Eutherian(teodoor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Wyn is rental. Wyn is scaley. Valera is rental. Valera is acerose. Valera is procedural. Valera is disliked. Valera is scaley. If Valera is lunate then Valera is not procedural. If someone is procedural then they are rental. If Wyn is rental then Wyn is procedural. If Wyn is rental and Wyn is procedural then Wyn is lunate. If someone is acerose then they are disliked. If someone is acerose and not procedural then they are disliked. Wyn is not lunate.", "logic": "\nRental(wyn)\nScaley(wyn)\nRental(valera)\nAcerose(valera)\nProcedural(valera)\nDisliked(valera)\nScaley(valera)\nLunate(valera) -> not Procedural(valera)\nforall x (Procedural(x) -> Rental(x))\nRental(wyn) -> Procedural(wyn)\nRental(wyn) and Procedural(wyn) -> Lunate(wyn)\nforall x (Acerose(x) -> Disliked(x))\nforall x (Acerose(x) and not Procedural(x) -> Disliked(x))\n\nnot Lunate(wyn)\n\nRental(wyn) and Rental(wyn) -> Procedural(wyn) -> therefore Procedural(wyn) Rental(wyn) and Procedural(wyn) and Rental(wyn) and Procedural(wyn) -> Lunate(wyn) -> therefore Lunate(wyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Reggi is corporeal. Reggi is afoul. Roxy is corporeal. Roxy is asteriated. Roxy is impelled. Roxy is lengthwise. Roxy is afoul. If Roxy is turkic then Roxy is not impelled. If someone is impelled then they are corporeal. If Reggi is corporeal then Reggi is impelled. If Reggi is corporeal and Reggi is impelled then Reggi is turkic. If someone is asteriated then they are lengthwise. If someone is asteriated and not impelled then they are lengthwise. Reggi is not lengthwise.", "logic": "\nCorporeal(reggi)\nAfoul(reggi)\nCorporeal(roxy)\nAsteriated(roxy)\nImpelled(roxy)\nLengthwise(roxy)\nAfoul(roxy)\nTurkic(roxy) -> not Impelled(roxy)\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> Corporeal(x))\nCorporeal(reggi) -> Impelled(reggi)\nCorporeal(reggi) and Impelled(reggi) -> Turkic(reggi)\nforall x (Asteriated(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nforall x (Asteriated(x) and not Impelled(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\n\nnot Lengthwise(reggi)\n\nforall x (Asteriated(x) -> Lengthwise(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Lisa is reciprocal. Lisa is longhand. Kailey is reciprocal. Kailey is everyday. Kailey is homonymous. Kailey is splintery. Kailey is longhand. If Kailey is thunderous then Kailey is not homonymous. If someone is homonymous then they are reciprocal. If Lisa is reciprocal then Lisa is homonymous. If Lisa is reciprocal and Lisa is homonymous then Lisa is thunderous. If someone is everyday then they are splintery. If someone is everyday and not homonymous then they are splintery. Kailey is red.", "logic": "\nReciprocal(lisa)\nLonghand(lisa)\nReciprocal(kailey)\nEveryday(kailey)\nHomonymous(kailey)\nSplintery(kailey)\nLonghand(kailey)\nThunderous(kailey) -> not Homonymous(kailey)\nforall x (Homonymous(x) -> Reciprocal(x))\nReciprocal(lisa) -> Homonymous(lisa)\nReciprocal(lisa) and Homonymous(lisa) -> Thunderous(lisa)\nforall x (Everyday(x) -> Splintery(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) and not Homonymous(x) -> Splintery(x))\n\nRed(kailey)\n\nRed(kailey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Normie is solomonic. Normie is successful. Lavinia is solomonic. Lavinia is ameboid. Lavinia is nitrous. Lavinia is musical. Lavinia is successful. If Lavinia is coagulate then Lavinia is not nitrous. If someone is nitrous then they are solomonic. If Normie is solomonic then Normie is nitrous. If Normie is solomonic and Normie is nitrous then Normie is coagulate. If someone is ameboid then they are musical. If someone is ameboid and not nitrous then they are musical. Normie is not ameboid.", "logic": "\nSolomonic(normie)\nSuccessful(normie)\nSolomonic(lavinia)\nAmeboid(lavinia)\nNitrous(lavinia)\nMusical(lavinia)\nSuccessful(lavinia)\nCoagulate(lavinia) -> not Nitrous(lavinia)\nforall x (Nitrous(x) -> Solomonic(x))\nSolomonic(normie) -> Nitrous(normie)\nSolomonic(normie) and Nitrous(normie) -> Coagulate(normie)\nforall x (Ameboid(x) -> Musical(x))\nforall x (Ameboid(x) and not Nitrous(x) -> Musical(x))\n\nnot Ameboid(normie)\n\nnot Ameboid(normie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Berti is induced. Berti is hunched. Mortimer is induced. Mortimer is accumbent. Mortimer is landlocked. Mortimer is infective. Mortimer is hunched. If Mortimer is alto then Mortimer is not landlocked. If someone is landlocked then they are induced. If Berti is induced then Berti is landlocked. If Berti is induced and Berti is landlocked then Berti is alto. If someone is accumbent then they are infective. If someone is accumbent and not landlocked then they are infective. Berti is red.", "logic": "\nInduced(berti)\nHunched(berti)\nInduced(mortimer)\nAccumbent(mortimer)\nLandlocked(mortimer)\nInfective(mortimer)\nHunched(mortimer)\nAlto(mortimer) -> not Landlocked(mortimer)\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Induced(x))\nInduced(berti) -> Landlocked(berti)\nInduced(berti) and Landlocked(berti) -> Alto(berti)\nforall x (Accumbent(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Accumbent(x) and not Landlocked(x) -> Infective(x))\n\nRed(berti)\n\nRed(berti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1847"} {"premises": "Terina is responsive. Terina is hesperian. Terina is sylphlike. Terina is gimbaled. Terina is amidship. Nicole is responsive. Nicole is hesperian. Nicole is sylphlike. Nicole is gimbaled. Nicole is nett. Nicole is inhumane. Nicole is amidship. If Nicole is sylphlike and Nicole is gimbaled then Nicole is nett. If Nicole is sylphlike then Nicole is amidship. All responsive, amidship people are nett. Quiet people are gimbaled. If someone is sylphlike and nett then they are inhumane. If someone is inhumane then they are hesperian. Nicole is gimbaled.", "logic": "\nResponsive(terina)\nHesperian(terina)\nSylphlike(terina)\nGimbaled(terina)\nAmidship(terina)\nResponsive(nicole)\nHesperian(nicole)\nSylphlike(nicole)\nGimbaled(nicole)\nNett(nicole)\nInhumane(nicole)\nAmidship(nicole)\nSylphlike(nicole) and Gimbaled(nicole) -> Nett(nicole)\nSylphlike(nicole) -> Amidship(nicole)\nforall x (Responsive(x) and Amidship(x) -> Nett(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) and Nett(x) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Hesperian(x))\n\nGimbaled(nicole)\n\ntherefore Gimbaled(nicole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-957"} {"premises": "Stern is endearing. Stern is mazed. Stern is cumulous. Stern is unselected. Stern is seaborne. Quill is endearing. Quill is mazed. Quill is cumulous. Quill is unselected. Quill is sporadic. Quill is insane. Quill is seaborne. If Quill is cumulous and Quill is unselected then Quill is sporadic. If Quill is cumulous then Quill is seaborne. All endearing, seaborne people are sporadic. Quiet people are unselected. If someone is cumulous and sporadic then they are insane. If someone is insane then they are mazed. Quill is not sporadic.", "logic": "\nEndearing(stern)\nMazed(stern)\nCumulous(stern)\nUnselected(stern)\nSeaborne(stern)\nEndearing(quill)\nMazed(quill)\nCumulous(quill)\nUnselected(quill)\nSporadic(quill)\nInsane(quill)\nSeaborne(quill)\nCumulous(quill) and Unselected(quill) -> Sporadic(quill)\nCumulous(quill) -> Seaborne(quill)\nforall x (Endearing(x) and Seaborne(x) -> Sporadic(x))\nforall x (Insane(x) -> Unselected(x))\nforall x (Cumulous(x) and Sporadic(x) -> Insane(x))\nforall x (Insane(x) -> Mazed(x))\n\nnot Sporadic(quill)\n\ntherefore Sporadic(quill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-957"} {"premises": "Llewellyn is needed. Llewellyn is decumbent. Llewellyn is bookable. Llewellyn is heady. Llewellyn is fortissimo. Dedie is needed. Dedie is decumbent. Dedie is bookable. Dedie is heady. Dedie is unlogical. Dedie is juvenile. Dedie is fortissimo. If Dedie is bookable and Dedie is heady then Dedie is unlogical. If Dedie is bookable then Dedie is fortissimo. All needed, fortissimo people are unlogical. Quiet people are heady. If someone is bookable and unlogical then they are juvenile. If someone is juvenile then they are decumbent. Llewellyn is unlogical.", "logic": "\nNeeded(llewellyn)\nDecumbent(llewellyn)\nBookable(llewellyn)\nHeady(llewellyn)\nFortissimo(llewellyn)\nNeeded(dedie)\nDecumbent(dedie)\nBookable(dedie)\nHeady(dedie)\nUnlogical(dedie)\nJuvenile(dedie)\nFortissimo(dedie)\nBookable(dedie) and Heady(dedie) -> Unlogical(dedie)\nBookable(dedie) -> Fortissimo(dedie)\nforall x (Needed(x) and Fortissimo(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Bookable(x) and Unlogical(x) -> Juvenile(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) -> Decumbent(x))\n\nUnlogical(llewellyn)\n\nNeeded(llewellyn) and Fortissimo(llewellyn) and forall x (Needed(x) and Fortissimo(x) -> Unlogical(x)) -> therefore Unlogical(llewellyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-957"} {"premises": "Barnaby is epizoic. Barnaby is glace. Barnaby is unwearable. Barnaby is regent. Barnaby is descending. Rich is epizoic. Rich is glace. Rich is unwearable. Rich is regent. Rich is short. Rich is gibbose. Rich is descending. If Rich is unwearable and Rich is regent then Rich is short. If Rich is unwearable then Rich is descending. All epizoic, descending people are short. Quiet people are regent. If someone is unwearable and short then they are gibbose. If someone is gibbose then they are glace. Barnaby is not short.", "logic": "\nEpizoic(barnaby)\nGlace(barnaby)\nUnwearable(barnaby)\nRegent(barnaby)\nDescending(barnaby)\nEpizoic(rich)\nGlace(rich)\nUnwearable(rich)\nRegent(rich)\nShort(rich)\nGibbose(rich)\nDescending(rich)\nUnwearable(rich) and Regent(rich) -> Short(rich)\nUnwearable(rich) -> Descending(rich)\nforall x (Epizoic(x) and Descending(x) -> Short(x))\nforall x (Gibbose(x) -> Regent(x))\nforall x (Unwearable(x) and Short(x) -> Gibbose(x))\nforall x (Gibbose(x) -> Glace(x))\n\nnot Short(barnaby)\n\nEpizoic(barnaby) and Descending(barnaby) and forall x (Epizoic(x) and Descending(x) -> Short(x)) -> therefore Short(barnaby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-957"} {"premises": "Giuseppe is unerect. Giuseppe is toughened. Giuseppe is toroidal. Giuseppe is exegetical. Giuseppe is araceous. Farrand is unerect. Farrand is toughened. Farrand is toroidal. Farrand is exegetical. Farrand is prenominal. Farrand is sublimated. Farrand is araceous. If Farrand is toroidal and Farrand is exegetical then Farrand is prenominal. If Farrand is toroidal then Farrand is araceous. All unerect, araceous people are prenominal. Quiet people are exegetical. If someone is toroidal and prenominal then they are sublimated. If someone is sublimated then they are toughened. Giuseppe is sublimated.", "logic": "\nUnerect(giuseppe)\nToughened(giuseppe)\nToroidal(giuseppe)\nExegetical(giuseppe)\nAraceous(giuseppe)\nUnerect(farrand)\nToughened(farrand)\nToroidal(farrand)\nExegetical(farrand)\nPrenominal(farrand)\nSublimated(farrand)\nAraceous(farrand)\nToroidal(farrand) and Exegetical(farrand) -> Prenominal(farrand)\nToroidal(farrand) -> Araceous(farrand)\nforall x (Unerect(x) and Araceous(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> Exegetical(x))\nforall x (Toroidal(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Sublimated(x))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> Toughened(x))\n\nSublimated(giuseppe)\n\nUnerect(giuseppe) and Araceous(giuseppe) and forall x (Unerect(x) and Araceous(x) -> Prenominal(x)) -> therefore Prenominal(giuseppe) Toroidal(giuseppe) and Prenominal(giuseppe) and forall x (Toroidal(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Sublimated(x)) -> therefore Sublimated(giuseppe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-957"} {"premises": "Natka is antimonic. Natka is pianissimo. Natka is monotone. Natka is chinchy. Natka is fastened. Kathe is antimonic. Kathe is pianissimo. Kathe is monotone. Kathe is chinchy. Kathe is thoracic. Kathe is jittering. Kathe is fastened. If Kathe is monotone and Kathe is chinchy then Kathe is thoracic. If Kathe is monotone then Kathe is fastened. All antimonic, fastened people are thoracic. Quiet people are chinchy. If someone is monotone and thoracic then they are jittering. If someone is jittering then they are pianissimo. Natka is not jittering.", "logic": "\nAntimonic(natka)\nPianissimo(natka)\nMonotone(natka)\nChinchy(natka)\nFastened(natka)\nAntimonic(kathe)\nPianissimo(kathe)\nMonotone(kathe)\nChinchy(kathe)\nThoracic(kathe)\nJittering(kathe)\nFastened(kathe)\nMonotone(kathe) and Chinchy(kathe) -> Thoracic(kathe)\nMonotone(kathe) -> Fastened(kathe)\nforall x (Antimonic(x) and Fastened(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Jittering(x) -> Chinchy(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) and Thoracic(x) -> Jittering(x))\nforall x (Jittering(x) -> Pianissimo(x))\n\nnot Jittering(natka)\n\nAntimonic(natka) and Fastened(natka) and forall x (Antimonic(x) and Fastened(x) -> Thoracic(x)) -> therefore Thoracic(natka) Monotone(natka) and Thoracic(natka) and forall x (Monotone(x) and Thoracic(x) -> Jittering(x)) -> therefore Jittering(natka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-957"} {"premises": "Ivie is extempore. Ivie is seamanlike. Ivie is gossipy. Ivie is unfocused. Alwin is gingerly. Alwin is seamanlike. Alwin is unfocused. If someone is metatarsal and haptic then they are gossipy. If Alwin is gingerly and Alwin is seamanlike then Alwin is metatarsal. All haptic people are gossipy. If someone is unfocused and gossipy then they are extempore. If someone is haptic and unfocused then they are gossipy. If Alwin is unfocused then Alwin is gossipy. All metatarsal, haptic people are gingerly. All seamanlike, gossipy people are metatarsal. Ivie is extempore.", "logic": "\nExtempore(ivie)\nSeamanlike(ivie)\nGossipy(ivie)\nUnfocused(ivie)\nGingerly(alwin)\nSeamanlike(alwin)\nUnfocused(alwin)\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) and Haptic(x) -> Gossipy(x))\nGingerly(alwin) and Seamanlike(alwin) -> Metatarsal(alwin)\nforall x (Haptic(x) -> Gossipy(x))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Gossipy(x) -> Extempore(x))\nforall x (Haptic(x) and Unfocused(x) -> Gossipy(x))\nUnfocused(alwin) -> Gossipy(alwin)\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) and Haptic(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nforall x (Seamanlike(x) and Gossipy(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\n\nExtempore(ivie)\n\ntherefore Extempore(ivie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "Chevalier is zestful. Chevalier is molecular. Chevalier is outlined. Chevalier is extensible. Michaela is lucifugous. Michaela is molecular. Michaela is extensible. If someone is hesitant and solicitous then they are outlined. If Michaela is lucifugous and Michaela is molecular then Michaela is hesitant. All solicitous people are outlined. If someone is extensible and outlined then they are zestful. If someone is solicitous and extensible then they are outlined. If Michaela is extensible then Michaela is outlined. All hesitant, solicitous people are lucifugous. All molecular, outlined people are hesitant. Michaela is not molecular.", "logic": "\nZestful(chevalier)\nMolecular(chevalier)\nOutlined(chevalier)\nExtensible(chevalier)\nLucifugous(michaela)\nMolecular(michaela)\nExtensible(michaela)\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Solicitous(x) -> Outlined(x))\nLucifugous(michaela) and Molecular(michaela) -> Hesitant(michaela)\nforall x (Solicitous(x) -> Outlined(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) and Outlined(x) -> Zestful(x))\nforall x (Solicitous(x) and Extensible(x) -> Outlined(x))\nExtensible(michaela) -> Outlined(michaela)\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Solicitous(x) -> Lucifugous(x))\nforall x (Molecular(x) and Outlined(x) -> Hesitant(x))\n\nnot Molecular(michaela)\n\ntherefore Molecular(michaela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "Erhart is shameless. Erhart is sooty. Erhart is endearing. Erhart is plumbous. Toddy is nonionised. Toddy is sooty. Toddy is plumbous. If someone is extirpable and palmate then they are endearing. If Toddy is nonionised and Toddy is sooty then Toddy is extirpable. All palmate people are endearing. If someone is plumbous and endearing then they are shameless. If someone is palmate and plumbous then they are endearing. If Toddy is plumbous then Toddy is endearing. All extirpable, palmate people are nonionised. All sooty, endearing people are extirpable. Toddy is extirpable.", "logic": "\nShameless(erhart)\nSooty(erhart)\nEndearing(erhart)\nPlumbous(erhart)\nNonionised(toddy)\nSooty(toddy)\nPlumbous(toddy)\nforall x (Extirpable(x) and Palmate(x) -> Endearing(x))\nNonionised(toddy) and Sooty(toddy) -> Extirpable(toddy)\nforall x (Palmate(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Endearing(x) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) and Plumbous(x) -> Endearing(x))\nPlumbous(toddy) -> Endearing(toddy)\nforall x (Extirpable(x) and Palmate(x) -> Nonionised(x))\nforall x (Sooty(x) and Endearing(x) -> Extirpable(x))\n\nExtirpable(toddy)\n\nNonionised(toddy) and Sooty(toddy) and Nonionised(toddy) and Sooty(toddy) -> Extirpable(toddy) -> therefore Extirpable(toddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "Shir is lamblike. Shir is crumbly. Shir is tracheal. Shir is bated. Wren is forehand. Wren is crumbly. Wren is bated. If someone is patronless and formidable then they are tracheal. If Wren is forehand and Wren is crumbly then Wren is patronless. All formidable people are tracheal. If someone is bated and tracheal then they are lamblike. If someone is formidable and bated then they are tracheal. If Wren is bated then Wren is tracheal. All patronless, formidable people are forehand. All crumbly, tracheal people are patronless. Wren is not patronless.", "logic": "\nLamblike(shir)\nCrumbly(shir)\nTracheal(shir)\nBated(shir)\nForehand(wren)\nCrumbly(wren)\nBated(wren)\nforall x (Patronless(x) and Formidable(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nForehand(wren) and Crumbly(wren) -> Patronless(wren)\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) and Tracheal(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and Bated(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nBated(wren) -> Tracheal(wren)\nforall x (Patronless(x) and Formidable(x) -> Forehand(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Tracheal(x) -> Patronless(x))\n\nnot Patronless(wren)\n\nForehand(wren) and Crumbly(wren) and Forehand(wren) and Crumbly(wren) -> Patronless(wren) -> therefore Patronless(wren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "Marge is giddy. Marge is fuscous. Marge is geographic. Marge is backward. Pierrette is conserved. Pierrette is fuscous. Pierrette is backward. If someone is narcotised and xxxviii then they are geographic. If Pierrette is conserved and Pierrette is fuscous then Pierrette is narcotised. All xxxviii people are geographic. If someone is backward and geographic then they are giddy. If someone is xxxviii and backward then they are geographic. If Pierrette is backward then Pierrette is geographic. All narcotised, xxxviii people are conserved. All fuscous, geographic people are narcotised. Pierrette is giddy.", "logic": "\nGiddy(marge)\nFuscous(marge)\nGeographic(marge)\nBackward(marge)\nConserved(pierrette)\nFuscous(pierrette)\nBackward(pierrette)\nforall x (Narcotised(x) and Xxxviii(x) -> Geographic(x))\nConserved(pierrette) and Fuscous(pierrette) -> Narcotised(pierrette)\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Backward(x) and Geographic(x) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) and Backward(x) -> Geographic(x))\nBackward(pierrette) -> Geographic(pierrette)\nforall x (Narcotised(x) and Xxxviii(x) -> Conserved(x))\nforall x (Fuscous(x) and Geographic(x) -> Narcotised(x))\n\nGiddy(pierrette)\n\nBackward(pierrette) and Backward(pierrette) -> Geographic(pierrette) -> therefore Geographic(pierrette) Backward(pierrette) and Geographic(pierrette) and forall x (Backward(x) and Geographic(x) -> Giddy(x)) -> therefore Giddy(pierrette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "Shandra is absolved. Shandra is advisory. Shandra is filiform. Shandra is caudate. Wilmette is hadal. Wilmette is advisory. Wilmette is caudate. If someone is bipartisan and carmine then they are filiform. If Wilmette is hadal and Wilmette is advisory then Wilmette is bipartisan. All carmine people are filiform. If someone is caudate and filiform then they are absolved. If someone is carmine and caudate then they are filiform. If Wilmette is caudate then Wilmette is filiform. All bipartisan, carmine people are hadal. All advisory, filiform people are bipartisan. Wilmette is not absolved.", "logic": "\nAbsolved(shandra)\nAdvisory(shandra)\nFiliform(shandra)\nCaudate(shandra)\nHadal(wilmette)\nAdvisory(wilmette)\nCaudate(wilmette)\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Carmine(x) -> Filiform(x))\nHadal(wilmette) and Advisory(wilmette) -> Bipartisan(wilmette)\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> Filiform(x))\nforall x (Caudate(x) and Filiform(x) -> Absolved(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x) and Caudate(x) -> Filiform(x))\nCaudate(wilmette) -> Filiform(wilmette)\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Carmine(x) -> Hadal(x))\nforall x (Advisory(x) and Filiform(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\n\nnot Absolved(wilmette)\n\nCaudate(wilmette) and Caudate(wilmette) -> Filiform(wilmette) -> therefore Filiform(wilmette) Caudate(wilmette) and Filiform(wilmette) and forall x (Caudate(x) and Filiform(x) -> Absolved(x)) -> therefore Absolved(wilmette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "Abagael is shipboard. Abagael is categorial. Abagael is headstrong. Abagael is famed. Mischa is coriaceous. Mischa is categorial. Mischa is famed. If someone is homoecious and turkish then they are headstrong. If Mischa is coriaceous and Mischa is categorial then Mischa is homoecious. All turkish people are headstrong. If someone is famed and headstrong then they are shipboard. If someone is turkish and famed then they are headstrong. If Mischa is famed then Mischa is headstrong. All homoecious, turkish people are coriaceous. All categorial, headstrong people are homoecious. Abagael is not coriaceous.", "logic": "\nShipboard(abagael)\nCategorial(abagael)\nHeadstrong(abagael)\nFamed(abagael)\nCoriaceous(mischa)\nCategorial(mischa)\nFamed(mischa)\nforall x (Homoecious(x) and Turkish(x) -> Headstrong(x))\nCoriaceous(mischa) and Categorial(mischa) -> Homoecious(mischa)\nforall x (Turkish(x) -> Headstrong(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Headstrong(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Turkish(x) and Famed(x) -> Headstrong(x))\nFamed(mischa) -> Headstrong(mischa)\nforall x (Homoecious(x) and Turkish(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Categorial(x) and Headstrong(x) -> Homoecious(x))\n\nnot Coriaceous(abagael)\n\nforall x (Homoecious(x) and Turkish(x) -> Coriaceous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "Callie is ritual. Callie is luscious. Callie is ugly. Callie is superb. Gen is inflamed. Gen is luscious. Gen is superb. If someone is endozoan and fused then they are ugly. If Gen is inflamed and Gen is luscious then Gen is endozoan. All fused people are ugly. If someone is superb and ugly then they are ritual. If someone is fused and superb then they are ugly. If Gen is superb then Gen is ugly. All endozoan, fused people are inflamed. All luscious, ugly people are endozoan. Gen is fused.", "logic": "\nRitual(callie)\nLuscious(callie)\nUgly(callie)\nSuperb(callie)\nInflamed(gen)\nLuscious(gen)\nSuperb(gen)\nforall x (Endozoan(x) and Fused(x) -> Ugly(x))\nInflamed(gen) and Luscious(gen) -> Endozoan(gen)\nforall x (Fused(x) -> Ugly(x))\nforall x (Superb(x) and Ugly(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Fused(x) and Superb(x) -> Ugly(x))\nSuperb(gen) -> Ugly(gen)\nforall x (Endozoan(x) and Fused(x) -> Inflamed(x))\nforall x (Luscious(x) and Ugly(x) -> Endozoan(x))\n\nFused(gen)\n\nFused(gen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1976"} {"premises": "The honor is alto. The honor is rearmost. The honor is afferent. The honor is abject. The honor is rental. The honor canter the audra. The honor retrieve the audra. The honor unitise the audra. The audra is alto. The audra is rearmost. The audra is afferent. The audra is abject. The audra is rental. The audra canter the honor. The audra retrieve the honor. The audra unitise the honor. If someone canter the audra then they visit the audra. If someone retrieve the honor then the honor canter the audra. If someone canter the honor then they need the audra. The honor is rental.", "logic": "\nAlto(honor)\nRearmost(honor)\nAfferent(honor)\nAbject(honor)\nRental(honor)\nCanter(honor, audra)\nRetrieve(honor, audra)\nUnitise(honor, audra)\nAlto(audra)\nRearmost(audra)\nAfferent(audra)\nAbject(audra)\nRental(audra)\nCanter(audra, honor)\nRetrieve(audra, honor)\nUnitise(audra, honor)\nforall x (Canter(x, audra) -> Unitise(x, audra))\nforall x (Retrieve(x, honor) -> Canter(honor, audra))\nforall x (Canter(x, honor) -> Canter(x, audra))\n\nRental(honor)\n\ntherefore Rental(honor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The malka is pulmonary. The malka is avascular. The malka is amnesic. The malka is substitute. The malka is cordate. The malka rise the jerald. The malka complement the jerald. The malka guggle the jerald. The jerald is pulmonary. The jerald is avascular. The jerald is amnesic. The jerald is substitute. The jerald is cordate. The jerald rise the malka. The jerald complement the malka. The jerald guggle the malka. If someone rise the jerald then they visit the jerald. If someone complement the malka then the malka rise the jerald. If someone rise the malka then they need the jerald. The jerald does not visit the malka.", "logic": "\nPulmonary(malka)\nAvascular(malka)\nAmnesic(malka)\nSubstitute(malka)\nCordate(malka)\nRise(malka, jerald)\nComplement(malka, jerald)\nGuggle(malka, jerald)\nPulmonary(jerald)\nAvascular(jerald)\nAmnesic(jerald)\nSubstitute(jerald)\nCordate(jerald)\nRise(jerald, malka)\nComplement(jerald, malka)\nGuggle(jerald, malka)\nforall x (Rise(x, jerald) -> Guggle(x, jerald))\nforall x (Complement(x, malka) -> Rise(malka, jerald))\nforall x (Rise(x, malka) -> Rise(x, jerald))\n\nnot Guggle(jerald, malka)\n\ntherefore Guggle(jerald, malka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The joelie is scalloped. The joelie is grazed. The joelie is decorated. The joelie is sniffy. The joelie is weeny. The joelie distract the nicole. The joelie pinpoint the nicole. The joelie dock the nicole. The nicole is scalloped. The nicole is grazed. The nicole is decorated. The nicole is sniffy. The nicole is weeny. The nicole distract the joelie. The nicole pinpoint the joelie. The nicole dock the joelie. If someone distract the nicole then they visit the nicole. If someone pinpoint the joelie then the joelie distract the nicole. If someone distract the joelie then they need the nicole. The nicole distract the nicole.", "logic": "\nScalloped(joelie)\nGrazed(joelie)\nDecorated(joelie)\nSniffy(joelie)\nWeeny(joelie)\nDistract(joelie, nicole)\nPinpoint(joelie, nicole)\nDock(joelie, nicole)\nScalloped(nicole)\nGrazed(nicole)\nDecorated(nicole)\nSniffy(nicole)\nWeeny(nicole)\nDistract(nicole, joelie)\nPinpoint(nicole, joelie)\nDock(nicole, joelie)\nforall x (Distract(x, nicole) -> Dock(x, nicole))\nforall x (Pinpoint(x, joelie) -> Distract(joelie, nicole))\nforall x (Distract(x, joelie) -> Distract(x, nicole))\n\nDistract(nicole, nicole)\n\nDistract(nicole, joelie) and forall x (Distract(x, joelie) -> Distract(x, nicole)) -> therefore Distract(nicole, nicole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The lina is sanguinary. The lina is steamed. The lina is positivist. The lina is puritanic. The lina is dignifying. The lina vault the peggi. The lina housekeep the peggi. The lina massacre the peggi. The peggi is sanguinary. The peggi is steamed. The peggi is positivist. The peggi is puritanic. The peggi is dignifying. The peggi vault the lina. The peggi housekeep the lina. The peggi massacre the lina. If someone vault the peggi then they visit the peggi. If someone housekeep the lina then the lina vault the peggi. If someone vault the lina then they need the peggi. The peggi does not need the peggi.", "logic": "\nSanguinary(lina)\nSteamed(lina)\nPositivist(lina)\nPuritanic(lina)\nDignifying(lina)\nVault(lina, peggi)\nHousekeep(lina, peggi)\nMassacre(lina, peggi)\nSanguinary(peggi)\nSteamed(peggi)\nPositivist(peggi)\nPuritanic(peggi)\nDignifying(peggi)\nVault(peggi, lina)\nHousekeep(peggi, lina)\nMassacre(peggi, lina)\nforall x (Vault(x, peggi) -> Massacre(x, peggi))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, lina) -> Vault(lina, peggi))\nforall x (Vault(x, lina) -> Vault(x, peggi))\n\nnot Vault(peggi, peggi)\n\nVault(peggi, lina) and forall x (Vault(x, lina) -> Vault(x, peggi)) -> therefore Vault(peggi, peggi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The georgiana is chatty. The georgiana is malaysian. The georgiana is lovable. The georgiana is steely. The georgiana is various. The georgiana itemise the penrod. The georgiana recline the penrod. The georgiana discase the penrod. The penrod is chatty. The penrod is malaysian. The penrod is lovable. The penrod is steely. The penrod is various. The penrod itemise the georgiana. The penrod recline the georgiana. The penrod discase the georgiana. If someone itemise the penrod then they visit the penrod. If someone recline the georgiana then the georgiana itemise the penrod. If someone itemise the georgiana then they need the penrod. The penrod discase the penrod.", "logic": "\nChatty(georgiana)\nMalaysian(georgiana)\nLovable(georgiana)\nSteely(georgiana)\nVarious(georgiana)\nItemise(georgiana, penrod)\nRecline(georgiana, penrod)\nDiscase(georgiana, penrod)\nChatty(penrod)\nMalaysian(penrod)\nLovable(penrod)\nSteely(penrod)\nVarious(penrod)\nItemise(penrod, georgiana)\nRecline(penrod, georgiana)\nDiscase(penrod, georgiana)\nforall x (Itemise(x, penrod) -> Discase(x, penrod))\nforall x (Recline(x, georgiana) -> Itemise(georgiana, penrod))\nforall x (Itemise(x, georgiana) -> Itemise(x, penrod))\n\nDiscase(penrod, penrod)\n\nItemise(penrod, georgiana) and forall x (Itemise(x, georgiana) -> Itemise(x, penrod)) -> therefore Itemise(penrod, penrod) Itemise(penrod, penrod) and forall x (Itemise(x, penrod) -> Discase(x, penrod)) -> therefore Discase(penrod, penrod)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The leonanie is still. The leonanie is opulent. The leonanie is inverted. The leonanie is travelled. The leonanie is flowered. The leonanie buck the ronica. The leonanie decrease the ronica. The leonanie chine the ronica. The ronica is still. The ronica is opulent. The ronica is inverted. The ronica is travelled. The ronica is flowered. The ronica buck the leonanie. The ronica decrease the leonanie. The ronica chine the leonanie. If someone buck the ronica then they visit the ronica. If someone decrease the leonanie then the leonanie buck the ronica. If someone buck the leonanie then they need the ronica. The ronica does not visit the ronica.", "logic": "\nStill(leonanie)\nOpulent(leonanie)\nInverted(leonanie)\nTravelled(leonanie)\nFlowered(leonanie)\nBuck(leonanie, ronica)\nDecrease(leonanie, ronica)\nChine(leonanie, ronica)\nStill(ronica)\nOpulent(ronica)\nInverted(ronica)\nTravelled(ronica)\nFlowered(ronica)\nBuck(ronica, leonanie)\nDecrease(ronica, leonanie)\nChine(ronica, leonanie)\nforall x (Buck(x, ronica) -> Chine(x, ronica))\nforall x (Decrease(x, leonanie) -> Buck(leonanie, ronica))\nforall x (Buck(x, leonanie) -> Buck(x, ronica))\n\nnot Chine(ronica, ronica)\n\nBuck(ronica, leonanie) and forall x (Buck(x, leonanie) -> Buck(x, ronica)) -> therefore Buck(ronica, ronica) Buck(ronica, ronica) and forall x (Buck(x, ronica) -> Chine(x, ronica)) -> therefore Chine(ronica, ronica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The pinchas is baffling. The pinchas is shorn. The pinchas is stomachic. The pinchas is grumpy. The pinchas is globose. The pinchas slug the rajeev. The pinchas mythicize the rajeev. The pinchas forefend the rajeev. The rajeev is baffling. The rajeev is shorn. The rajeev is stomachic. The rajeev is grumpy. The rajeev is globose. The rajeev slug the pinchas. The rajeev mythicize the pinchas. The rajeev forefend the pinchas. If someone slug the rajeev then they visit the rajeev. If someone mythicize the pinchas then the pinchas slug the rajeev. If someone slug the pinchas then they need the rajeev. The pinchas does not need the pinchas.", "logic": "\nBaffling(pinchas)\nShorn(pinchas)\nStomachic(pinchas)\nGrumpy(pinchas)\nGlobose(pinchas)\nSlug(pinchas, rajeev)\nMythicize(pinchas, rajeev)\nForefend(pinchas, rajeev)\nBaffling(rajeev)\nShorn(rajeev)\nStomachic(rajeev)\nGrumpy(rajeev)\nGlobose(rajeev)\nSlug(rajeev, pinchas)\nMythicize(rajeev, pinchas)\nForefend(rajeev, pinchas)\nforall x (Slug(x, rajeev) -> Forefend(x, rajeev))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, pinchas) -> Slug(pinchas, rajeev))\nforall x (Slug(x, pinchas) -> Slug(x, rajeev))\n\nnot Slug(pinchas, pinchas)\n\nnot Slug(pinchas, pinchas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The rubin is periodic. The rubin is degenerate. The rubin is subfusc. The rubin is gaussian. The rubin is vestal. The rubin carbonate the truman. The rubin mull the truman. The rubin agnise the truman. The truman is periodic. The truman is degenerate. The truman is subfusc. The truman is gaussian. The truman is vestal. The truman carbonate the rubin. The truman mull the rubin. The truman agnise the rubin. If someone carbonate the truman then they visit the truman. If someone mull the rubin then the rubin carbonate the truman. If someone carbonate the rubin then they need the truman. The rubin mull the rubin.", "logic": "\nPeriodic(rubin)\nDegenerate(rubin)\nSubfusc(rubin)\nGaussian(rubin)\nVestal(rubin)\nCarbonate(rubin, truman)\nMull(rubin, truman)\nAgnise(rubin, truman)\nPeriodic(truman)\nDegenerate(truman)\nSubfusc(truman)\nGaussian(truman)\nVestal(truman)\nCarbonate(truman, rubin)\nMull(truman, rubin)\nAgnise(truman, rubin)\nforall x (Carbonate(x, truman) -> Agnise(x, truman))\nforall x (Mull(x, rubin) -> Carbonate(rubin, truman))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, rubin) -> Carbonate(x, truman))\n\nMull(rubin, rubin)\n\nMull(rubin, rubin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The christean is consensual. The christean is desecrated. The christean is jeweled. The christean is smoothed. The christean is noticed. The christean blunt the imelda. The christean true the imelda. The christean disgorge the imelda. The imelda is consensual. The imelda is desecrated. The imelda is jeweled. The imelda is smoothed. The imelda is noticed. The imelda blunt the christean. The imelda true the christean. The imelda disgorge the christean. If someone blunt the imelda then they visit the imelda. If someone true the christean then the christean blunt the imelda. If someone blunt the christean then they need the imelda. The imelda does not see the imelda.", "logic": "\nConsensual(christean)\nDesecrated(christean)\nJeweled(christean)\nSmoothed(christean)\nNoticed(christean)\nBlunt(christean, imelda)\nTrue(christean, imelda)\nDisgorge(christean, imelda)\nConsensual(imelda)\nDesecrated(imelda)\nJeweled(imelda)\nSmoothed(imelda)\nNoticed(imelda)\nBlunt(imelda, christean)\nTrue(imelda, christean)\nDisgorge(imelda, christean)\nforall x (Blunt(x, imelda) -> Disgorge(x, imelda))\nforall x (True(x, christean) -> Blunt(christean, imelda))\nforall x (Blunt(x, christean) -> Blunt(x, imelda))\n\nnot True(imelda, imelda)\n\nnot True(imelda, imelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "The robinette is chordal. The robinette is mammalian. The robinette is myriad. The robinette is clubby. The robinette is litigious. The robinette overuse the lyndsay. The robinette pave the lyndsay. The robinette girdle the lyndsay. The lyndsay is chordal. The lyndsay is mammalian. The lyndsay is myriad. The lyndsay is clubby. The lyndsay is litigious. The lyndsay overuse the robinette. The lyndsay pave the robinette. The lyndsay girdle the robinette. If someone overuse the lyndsay then they visit the lyndsay. If someone pave the robinette then the robinette overuse the lyndsay. If someone overuse the robinette then they need the lyndsay. The robinette girdle the robinette.", "logic": "\nChordal(robinette)\nMammalian(robinette)\nMyriad(robinette)\nClubby(robinette)\nLitigious(robinette)\nOveruse(robinette, lyndsay)\nPave(robinette, lyndsay)\nGirdle(robinette, lyndsay)\nChordal(lyndsay)\nMammalian(lyndsay)\nMyriad(lyndsay)\nClubby(lyndsay)\nLitigious(lyndsay)\nOveruse(lyndsay, robinette)\nPave(lyndsay, robinette)\nGirdle(lyndsay, robinette)\nforall x (Overuse(x, lyndsay) -> Girdle(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Pave(x, robinette) -> Overuse(robinette, lyndsay))\nforall x (Overuse(x, robinette) -> Overuse(x, lyndsay))\n\nGirdle(robinette, robinette)\n\nGirdle(robinette, robinette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1930"} {"premises": "Ibby is cesarean. Ibby is glum. Row is psychotic. Green people are foxy. All foxy people are uncomely. Row is psychotic.", "logic": "\nCesarean(ibby)\nGlum(ibby)\nPsychotic(row)\nforall x (Cesarean(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> Uncomely(x))\n\nPsychotic(row)\n\ntherefore Psychotic(row)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Randell is commanding. Randell is blanketed. Nanon is unshielded. Green people are italic. All italic people are despondent. Randell is not blanketed.", "logic": "\nCommanding(randell)\nBlanketed(randell)\nUnshielded(nanon)\nforall x (Commanding(x) -> Italic(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Despondent(x))\n\nnot Blanketed(randell)\n\ntherefore Blanketed(randell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Morlee is outspoken. Morlee is bluish. Schroeder is void. Green people are ablated. All ablated people are libyan. Morlee is ablated.", "logic": "\nOutspoken(morlee)\nBluish(morlee)\nVoid(schroeder)\nforall x (Outspoken(x) -> Ablated(x))\nforall x (Ablated(x) -> Libyan(x))\n\nAblated(morlee)\n\nOutspoken(morlee) and forall x (Outspoken(x) -> Ablated(x)) -> therefore Ablated(morlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Bonnee is atonic. Bonnee is rejoicing. Leshia is seraphical. Green people are supposed. All supposed people are flocculent. Bonnee is not supposed.", "logic": "\nAtonic(bonnee)\nRejoicing(bonnee)\nSeraphical(leshia)\nforall x (Atonic(x) -> Supposed(x))\nforall x (Supposed(x) -> Flocculent(x))\n\nnot Supposed(bonnee)\n\nAtonic(bonnee) and forall x (Atonic(x) -> Supposed(x)) -> therefore Supposed(bonnee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Nata is decumbent. Nata is albescent. Rowena is piscine. Green people are factious. All factious people are lopsided. Nata is lopsided.", "logic": "\nDecumbent(nata)\nAlbescent(nata)\nPiscine(rowena)\nforall x (Decumbent(x) -> Factious(x))\nforall x (Factious(x) -> Lopsided(x))\n\nLopsided(nata)\n\nDecumbent(nata) and forall x (Decumbent(x) -> Factious(x)) -> therefore Factious(nata) Factious(nata) and forall x (Factious(x) -> Lopsided(x)) -> therefore Lopsided(nata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Warden is retired. Warden is nosey. Nataline is petalless. Green people are said. All said people are loving. Warden is not loving.", "logic": "\nRetired(warden)\nNosey(warden)\nPetalless(nataline)\nforall x (Retired(x) -> Said(x))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Loving(x))\n\nnot Loving(warden)\n\nRetired(warden) and forall x (Retired(x) -> Said(x)) -> therefore Said(warden) Said(warden) and forall x (Said(x) -> Loving(x)) -> therefore Loving(warden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Bartlett is unroofed. Bartlett is lusterless. Tiena is ninth. Green people are semiopaque. All semiopaque people are straggling. Tiena is not semiopaque.", "logic": "\nUnroofed(bartlett)\nLusterless(bartlett)\nNinth(tiena)\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Semiopaque(x))\nforall x (Semiopaque(x) -> Straggling(x))\n\nnot Semiopaque(tiena)\n\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Semiopaque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Waldo is bungled. Waldo is cauline. Elli is undomestic. Green people are lighted. All lighted people are vitiated. Elli is vitiated.", "logic": "\nBungled(waldo)\nCauline(waldo)\nUndomestic(elli)\nforall x (Bungled(x) -> Lighted(x))\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Vitiated(x))\n\nVitiated(elli)\n\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Vitiated(x)) <- forall x (Bungled(x) -> Lighted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Aretha is citrous. Aretha is applicable. Breena is outraged. Green people are perfect. All perfect people are synchronic. Aretha is not nice.", "logic": "\nCitrous(aretha)\nApplicable(aretha)\nOutraged(breena)\nforall x (Citrous(x) -> Perfect(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) -> Synchronic(x))\n\nnot Nice(aretha)\n\nnot Nice(aretha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Cilka is prideful. Cilka is enduring. Tiler is reddened. Green people are submissive. All submissive people are satirical. Tiler is prideful.", "logic": "\nPrideful(cilka)\nEnduring(cilka)\nReddened(tiler)\nforall x (Prideful(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) -> Satirical(x))\n\nPrideful(tiler)\n\nPrideful(tiler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Rosabella is next. Rosabella is moldy. Milka is inerrant. Green people are gibbous. All gibbous people are overawed. Milka is not moldy.", "logic": "\nNext(rosabella)\nMoldy(rosabella)\nInerrant(milka)\nforall x (Next(x) -> Gibbous(x))\nforall x (Gibbous(x) -> Overawed(x))\n\nnot Moldy(milka)\n\nnot Moldy(milka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Juana is unwed. Juana is linked. Camella is minacious. Green people are feeble. All feeble people are seminal. Camella is nice.", "logic": "\nUnwed(juana)\nLinked(juana)\nMinacious(camella)\nforall x (Unwed(x) -> Feeble(x))\nforall x (Feeble(x) -> Seminal(x))\n\nNice(camella)\n\nNice(camella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Heide is unhallowed. Heide is askew. Heide is normative. Heide is disturbed. Heide is hadean. Heide is pycnotic. Heide is bumpy. Kory is unhallowed. Kory is normative. Kory is hadean. Kory is pycnotic. Kory is bumpy. If Kory is hadean then Kory is pycnotic. All disturbed, askew things are hadean. If something is pycnotic then it is unhallowed. Cold things are askew. If Heide is askew and Heide is hadean then Heide is pycnotic. If Kory is askew and Kory is hadean then Kory is disturbed. Kory is pycnotic.", "logic": "\nUnhallowed(heide)\nAskew(heide)\nNormative(heide)\nDisturbed(heide)\nHadean(heide)\nPycnotic(heide)\nBumpy(heide)\nUnhallowed(kory)\nNormative(kory)\nHadean(kory)\nPycnotic(kory)\nBumpy(kory)\nHadean(kory) -> Pycnotic(kory)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) and Askew(x) -> Hadean(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Unhallowed(x))\nforall x (Normative(x) -> Askew(x))\nAskew(heide) and Hadean(heide) -> Pycnotic(heide)\nAskew(kory) and Hadean(kory) -> Disturbed(kory)\n\nPycnotic(kory)\n\ntherefore Pycnotic(kory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1336"} {"premises": "Layton is obstinate. Layton is anhydrous. Layton is capped. Layton is balzacian. Layton is cretinous. Layton is plush. Layton is restless. Sianna is obstinate. Sianna is capped. Sianna is cretinous. Sianna is plush. Sianna is restless. If Sianna is cretinous then Sianna is plush. All balzacian, anhydrous things are cretinous. If something is plush then it is obstinate. Cold things are anhydrous. If Layton is anhydrous and Layton is cretinous then Layton is plush. If Sianna is anhydrous and Sianna is cretinous then Sianna is balzacian. Layton is not restless.", "logic": "\nObstinate(layton)\nAnhydrous(layton)\nCapped(layton)\nBalzacian(layton)\nCretinous(layton)\nPlush(layton)\nRestless(layton)\nObstinate(sianna)\nCapped(sianna)\nCretinous(sianna)\nPlush(sianna)\nRestless(sianna)\nCretinous(sianna) -> Plush(sianna)\nforall x (Balzacian(x) and Anhydrous(x) -> Cretinous(x))\nforall x (Plush(x) -> Obstinate(x))\nforall x (Capped(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\nAnhydrous(layton) and Cretinous(layton) -> Plush(layton)\nAnhydrous(sianna) and Cretinous(sianna) -> Balzacian(sianna)\n\nnot Restless(layton)\n\ntherefore Restless(layton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1336"} {"premises": "Silvie is editorial. Silvie is boughten. Silvie is romanist. Silvie is wizard. Silvie is dingy. Silvie is hadean. Silvie is daylong. Danita is editorial. Danita is romanist. Danita is dingy. Danita is hadean. Danita is daylong. If Danita is dingy then Danita is hadean. All wizard, boughten things are dingy. If something is hadean then it is editorial. Cold things are boughten. If Silvie is boughten and Silvie is dingy then Silvie is hadean. If Danita is boughten and Danita is dingy then Danita is wizard. Danita is boughten.", "logic": "\nEditorial(silvie)\nBoughten(silvie)\nRomanist(silvie)\nWizard(silvie)\nDingy(silvie)\nHadean(silvie)\nDaylong(silvie)\nEditorial(danita)\nRomanist(danita)\nDingy(danita)\nHadean(danita)\nDaylong(danita)\nDingy(danita) -> Hadean(danita)\nforall x (Wizard(x) and Boughten(x) -> Dingy(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Editorial(x))\nforall x (Romanist(x) -> Boughten(x))\nBoughten(silvie) and Dingy(silvie) -> Hadean(silvie)\nBoughten(danita) and Dingy(danita) -> Wizard(danita)\n\nBoughten(danita)\n\nRomanist(danita) and forall x (Romanist(x) -> Boughten(x)) -> therefore Boughten(danita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1336"} {"premises": "Paten is carotid. Paten is hurt. Paten is incautious. Paten is bourgeois. Paten is clamant. Paten is botonnee. Paten is cuprous. Jackie is carotid. Jackie is incautious. Jackie is clamant. Jackie is botonnee. Jackie is cuprous. If Jackie is clamant then Jackie is botonnee. All bourgeois, hurt things are clamant. If something is botonnee then it is carotid. Cold things are hurt. If Paten is hurt and Paten is clamant then Paten is botonnee. If Jackie is hurt and Jackie is clamant then Jackie is bourgeois. Jackie is not hurt.", "logic": "\nCarotid(paten)\nHurt(paten)\nIncautious(paten)\nBourgeois(paten)\nClamant(paten)\nBotonnee(paten)\nCuprous(paten)\nCarotid(jackie)\nIncautious(jackie)\nClamant(jackie)\nBotonnee(jackie)\nCuprous(jackie)\nClamant(jackie) -> Botonnee(jackie)\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) and Hurt(x) -> Clamant(x))\nforall x (Botonnee(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Incautious(x) -> Hurt(x))\nHurt(paten) and Clamant(paten) -> Botonnee(paten)\nHurt(jackie) and Clamant(jackie) -> Bourgeois(jackie)\n\nnot Hurt(jackie)\n\nIncautious(jackie) and forall x (Incautious(x) -> Hurt(x)) -> therefore Hurt(jackie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1336"} {"premises": "Peg is heathenish. Peg is antipodean. Peg is sordid. Peg is hadean. Peg is unclad. Peg is verifying. Peg is alkalotic. Deanne is heathenish. Deanne is sordid. Deanne is unclad. Deanne is verifying. Deanne is alkalotic. If Deanne is unclad then Deanne is verifying. All hadean, antipodean things are unclad. If something is verifying then it is heathenish. Cold things are antipodean. If Peg is antipodean and Peg is unclad then Peg is verifying. If Deanne is antipodean and Deanne is unclad then Deanne is hadean. Deanne is hadean.", "logic": "\nHeathenish(peg)\nAntipodean(peg)\nSordid(peg)\nHadean(peg)\nUnclad(peg)\nVerifying(peg)\nAlkalotic(peg)\nHeathenish(deanne)\nSordid(deanne)\nUnclad(deanne)\nVerifying(deanne)\nAlkalotic(deanne)\nUnclad(deanne) -> Verifying(deanne)\nforall x (Hadean(x) and Antipodean(x) -> Unclad(x))\nforall x (Verifying(x) -> Heathenish(x))\nforall x (Sordid(x) -> Antipodean(x))\nAntipodean(peg) and Unclad(peg) -> Verifying(peg)\nAntipodean(deanne) and Unclad(deanne) -> Hadean(deanne)\n\nHadean(deanne)\n\nSordid(deanne) and forall x (Sordid(x) -> Antipodean(x)) -> therefore Antipodean(deanne) Antipodean(deanne) and Unclad(deanne) and Antipodean(deanne) and Unclad(deanne) -> Hadean(deanne) -> therefore Hadean(deanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1336"} {"premises": "Wandis is perversive. Wandis is hundred. Wandis is soignee. Wandis is comparable. Wandis is cisalpine. Wandis is ungainly. Wandis is syrupy. Regine is perversive. Regine is soignee. Regine is cisalpine. Regine is ungainly. Regine is syrupy. If Regine is cisalpine then Regine is ungainly. All comparable, hundred things are cisalpine. If something is ungainly then it is perversive. Cold things are hundred. If Wandis is hundred and Wandis is cisalpine then Wandis is ungainly. If Regine is hundred and Regine is cisalpine then Regine is comparable. Regine is not comparable.", "logic": "\nPerversive(wandis)\nHundred(wandis)\nSoignee(wandis)\nComparable(wandis)\nCisalpine(wandis)\nUngainly(wandis)\nSyrupy(wandis)\nPerversive(regine)\nSoignee(regine)\nCisalpine(regine)\nUngainly(regine)\nSyrupy(regine)\nCisalpine(regine) -> Ungainly(regine)\nforall x (Comparable(x) and Hundred(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Ungainly(x) -> Perversive(x))\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Hundred(x))\nHundred(wandis) and Cisalpine(wandis) -> Ungainly(wandis)\nHundred(regine) and Cisalpine(regine) -> Comparable(regine)\n\nnot Comparable(regine)\n\nSoignee(regine) and forall x (Soignee(x) -> Hundred(x)) -> therefore Hundred(regine) Hundred(regine) and Cisalpine(regine) and Hundred(regine) and Cisalpine(regine) -> Comparable(regine) -> therefore Comparable(regine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1336"} {"premises": "Ebba is bungaloid. Ebba is gargantuan. Ebba is unanimous. Ebba is forested. Ebba is lengthways. Ebba is astounding. Ebba is animal. Hadley is bungaloid. Hadley is forested. Hadley is astounding. Blue, forested people are animal. If someone is bungaloid and astounding then they are unanimous. All astounding, unanimous people are gargantuan. If someone is bungaloid and gargantuan then they are unanimous. Rough, bungaloid people are lengthways. Rough people are bungaloid. Ebba is forested.", "logic": "\nBungaloid(ebba)\nGargantuan(ebba)\nUnanimous(ebba)\nForested(ebba)\nLengthways(ebba)\nAstounding(ebba)\nAnimal(ebba)\nBungaloid(hadley)\nForested(hadley)\nAstounding(hadley)\nforall x (Gargantuan(x) and Forested(x) -> Animal(x))\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) and Astounding(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) and Unanimous(x) -> Gargantuan(x))\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) and Gargantuan(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) and Bungaloid(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\n\nForested(ebba)\n\ntherefore Forested(ebba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Daphne is uncaring. Daphne is shrinkable. Daphne is defiled. Daphne is gallant. Daphne is oecumenic. Daphne is baneful. Daphne is inedible. Kippie is uncaring. Kippie is gallant. Kippie is baneful. Blue, gallant people are inedible. If someone is uncaring and baneful then they are defiled. All baneful, defiled people are shrinkable. If someone is uncaring and shrinkable then they are defiled. Rough, uncaring people are oecumenic. Rough people are uncaring. Daphne is not inedible.", "logic": "\nUncaring(daphne)\nShrinkable(daphne)\nDefiled(daphne)\nGallant(daphne)\nOecumenic(daphne)\nBaneful(daphne)\nInedible(daphne)\nUncaring(kippie)\nGallant(kippie)\nBaneful(kippie)\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) and Gallant(x) -> Inedible(x))\nforall x (Uncaring(x) and Baneful(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Baneful(x) and Defiled(x) -> Shrinkable(x))\nforall x (Uncaring(x) and Shrinkable(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Baneful(x) and Uncaring(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Baneful(x) -> Uncaring(x))\n\nnot Inedible(daphne)\n\ntherefore Inedible(daphne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Theodora is alluring. Theodora is evil. Theodora is extrinsic. Theodora is untempered. Theodora is unskilled. Theodora is ransomed. Theodora is unpassable. Audry is alluring. Audry is untempered. Audry is ransomed. Blue, untempered people are unpassable. If someone is alluring and ransomed then they are extrinsic. All ransomed, extrinsic people are evil. If someone is alluring and evil then they are extrinsic. Rough, alluring people are unskilled. Rough people are alluring. Audry is unskilled.", "logic": "\nAlluring(theodora)\nEvil(theodora)\nExtrinsic(theodora)\nUntempered(theodora)\nUnskilled(theodora)\nRansomed(theodora)\nUnpassable(theodora)\nAlluring(audry)\nUntempered(audry)\nRansomed(audry)\nforall x (Evil(x) and Untempered(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Alluring(x) and Ransomed(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Extrinsic(x) -> Evil(x))\nforall x (Alluring(x) and Evil(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Alluring(x) -> Unskilled(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) -> Alluring(x))\n\nUnskilled(audry)\n\nRansomed(audry) and Alluring(audry) and forall x (Ransomed(x) and Alluring(x) -> Unskilled(x)) -> therefore Unskilled(audry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Laurella is genial. Laurella is orthodox. Laurella is adiabatic. Laurella is paradisal. Laurella is busybodied. Laurella is hearsay. Laurella is spongy. Kristine is genial. Kristine is paradisal. Kristine is hearsay. Blue, paradisal people are spongy. If someone is genial and hearsay then they are adiabatic. All hearsay, adiabatic people are orthodox. If someone is genial and orthodox then they are adiabatic. Rough, genial people are busybodied. Rough people are genial. Kristine is not busybodied.", "logic": "\nGenial(laurella)\nOrthodox(laurella)\nAdiabatic(laurella)\nParadisal(laurella)\nBusybodied(laurella)\nHearsay(laurella)\nSpongy(laurella)\nGenial(kristine)\nParadisal(kristine)\nHearsay(kristine)\nforall x (Orthodox(x) and Paradisal(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) and Hearsay(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) and Adiabatic(x) -> Orthodox(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) and Orthodox(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) and Genial(x) -> Busybodied(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) -> Genial(x))\n\nnot Busybodied(kristine)\n\nHearsay(kristine) and Genial(kristine) and forall x (Hearsay(x) and Genial(x) -> Busybodied(x)) -> therefore Busybodied(kristine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Mattie is bermudan. Mattie is unenviable. Mattie is damn. Mattie is enolic. Mattie is hegelian. Mattie is cliched. Mattie is vulcanised. Babara is bermudan. Babara is enolic. Babara is cliched. Blue, enolic people are vulcanised. If someone is bermudan and cliched then they are damn. All cliched, damn people are unenviable. If someone is bermudan and unenviable then they are damn. Rough, bermudan people are hegelian. Rough people are bermudan. Babara is unenviable.", "logic": "\nBermudan(mattie)\nUnenviable(mattie)\nDamn(mattie)\nEnolic(mattie)\nHegelian(mattie)\nCliched(mattie)\nVulcanised(mattie)\nBermudan(babara)\nEnolic(babara)\nCliched(babara)\nforall x (Unenviable(x) and Enolic(x) -> Vulcanised(x))\nforall x (Bermudan(x) and Cliched(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Damn(x) -> Unenviable(x))\nforall x (Bermudan(x) and Unenviable(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Bermudan(x) -> Hegelian(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Bermudan(x))\n\nUnenviable(babara)\n\nBermudan(babara) and Cliched(babara) and forall x (Bermudan(x) and Cliched(x) -> Damn(x)) -> therefore Damn(babara) Cliched(babara) and Damn(babara) and forall x (Cliched(x) and Damn(x) -> Unenviable(x)) -> therefore Unenviable(babara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Anallise is snaky. Anallise is monochrome. Anallise is decisive. Anallise is cubist. Anallise is fallow. Anallise is popliteal. Anallise is choric. Selinda is snaky. Selinda is cubist. Selinda is popliteal. Blue, cubist people are choric. If someone is snaky and popliteal then they are decisive. All popliteal, decisive people are monochrome. If someone is snaky and monochrome then they are decisive. Rough, snaky people are fallow. Rough people are snaky. Selinda is not monochrome.", "logic": "\nSnaky(anallise)\nMonochrome(anallise)\nDecisive(anallise)\nCubist(anallise)\nFallow(anallise)\nPopliteal(anallise)\nChoric(anallise)\nSnaky(selinda)\nCubist(selinda)\nPopliteal(selinda)\nforall x (Monochrome(x) and Cubist(x) -> Choric(x))\nforall x (Snaky(x) and Popliteal(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Popliteal(x) and Decisive(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Snaky(x) and Monochrome(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Popliteal(x) and Snaky(x) -> Fallow(x))\nforall x (Popliteal(x) -> Snaky(x))\n\nnot Monochrome(selinda)\n\nSnaky(selinda) and Popliteal(selinda) and forall x (Snaky(x) and Popliteal(x) -> Decisive(x)) -> therefore Decisive(selinda) Popliteal(selinda) and Decisive(selinda) and forall x (Popliteal(x) and Decisive(x) -> Monochrome(x)) -> therefore Monochrome(selinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-566"} {"premises": "Corina is rhomboidal. Corina is hueless. Corina is nettlesome. Corina is blanket. Corina is degressive. Corina is camphoric. Elysia is hueless. Elysia is degressive. Elysia is camphoric. Shirlene is rhomboidal. Shirlene is hueless. Shirlene is nettlesome. Shirlene is blanket. Shirlene is bribable. Shirlene is degressive. Shirlene is camphoric. If someone is hueless and rhomboidal then they are nettlesome. All bribable, degressive people are blanket. All degressive, hueless people are bribable. Corina is camphoric.", "logic": "\nRhomboidal(corina)\nHueless(corina)\nNettlesome(corina)\nBlanket(corina)\nDegressive(corina)\nCamphoric(corina)\nHueless(elysia)\nDegressive(elysia)\nCamphoric(elysia)\nRhomboidal(shirlene)\nHueless(shirlene)\nNettlesome(shirlene)\nBlanket(shirlene)\nBribable(shirlene)\nDegressive(shirlene)\nCamphoric(shirlene)\nforall x (Hueless(x) and Rhomboidal(x) -> Nettlesome(x))\nforall x (Bribable(x) and Degressive(x) -> Blanket(x))\nforall x (Degressive(x) and Hueless(x) -> Bribable(x))\n\nCamphoric(corina)\n\ntherefore Camphoric(corina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Elga is outdated. Elga is tasseled. Elga is mirrored. Elga is aliphatic. Elga is adducent. Elga is acetylic. Lenna is tasseled. Lenna is adducent. Lenna is acetylic. Paola is outdated. Paola is tasseled. Paola is mirrored. Paola is aliphatic. Paola is brutish. Paola is adducent. Paola is acetylic. If someone is tasseled and outdated then they are mirrored. All brutish, adducent people are aliphatic. All adducent, tasseled people are brutish. Elga is not aliphatic.", "logic": "\nOutdated(elga)\nTasseled(elga)\nMirrored(elga)\nAliphatic(elga)\nAdducent(elga)\nAcetylic(elga)\nTasseled(lenna)\nAdducent(lenna)\nAcetylic(lenna)\nOutdated(paola)\nTasseled(paola)\nMirrored(paola)\nAliphatic(paola)\nBrutish(paola)\nAdducent(paola)\nAcetylic(paola)\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Outdated(x) -> Mirrored(x))\nforall x (Brutish(x) and Adducent(x) -> Aliphatic(x))\nforall x (Adducent(x) and Tasseled(x) -> Brutish(x))\n\nnot Aliphatic(elga)\n\ntherefore Aliphatic(elga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Melania is preachy. Melania is polyphase. Melania is fahrenheit. Melania is delighted. Melania is roast. Melania is hardbound. Jeri is polyphase. Jeri is roast. Jeri is hardbound. Janith is preachy. Janith is polyphase. Janith is fahrenheit. Janith is delighted. Janith is military. Janith is roast. Janith is hardbound. If someone is polyphase and preachy then they are fahrenheit. All military, roast people are delighted. All roast, polyphase people are military. Melania is military.", "logic": "\nPreachy(melania)\nPolyphase(melania)\nFahrenheit(melania)\nDelighted(melania)\nRoast(melania)\nHardbound(melania)\nPolyphase(jeri)\nRoast(jeri)\nHardbound(jeri)\nPreachy(janith)\nPolyphase(janith)\nFahrenheit(janith)\nDelighted(janith)\nMilitary(janith)\nRoast(janith)\nHardbound(janith)\nforall x (Polyphase(x) and Preachy(x) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nforall x (Military(x) and Roast(x) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) and Polyphase(x) -> Military(x))\n\nMilitary(melania)\n\nRoast(melania) and Polyphase(melania) and forall x (Roast(x) and Polyphase(x) -> Military(x)) -> therefore Military(melania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Pryce is pronounced. Pryce is graceless. Pryce is denotative. Pryce is rocklike. Pryce is hardbacked. Pryce is reversible. Kristina is graceless. Kristina is hardbacked. Kristina is reversible. Tanya is pronounced. Tanya is graceless. Tanya is denotative. Tanya is rocklike. Tanya is magnetised. Tanya is hardbacked. Tanya is reversible. If someone is graceless and pronounced then they are denotative. All magnetised, hardbacked people are rocklike. All hardbacked, graceless people are magnetised. Pryce is not magnetised.", "logic": "\nPronounced(pryce)\nGraceless(pryce)\nDenotative(pryce)\nRocklike(pryce)\nHardbacked(pryce)\nReversible(pryce)\nGraceless(kristina)\nHardbacked(kristina)\nReversible(kristina)\nPronounced(tanya)\nGraceless(tanya)\nDenotative(tanya)\nRocklike(tanya)\nMagnetised(tanya)\nHardbacked(tanya)\nReversible(tanya)\nforall x (Graceless(x) and Pronounced(x) -> Denotative(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) and Hardbacked(x) -> Rocklike(x))\nforall x (Hardbacked(x) and Graceless(x) -> Magnetised(x))\n\nnot Magnetised(pryce)\n\nHardbacked(pryce) and Graceless(pryce) and forall x (Hardbacked(x) and Graceless(x) -> Magnetised(x)) -> therefore Magnetised(pryce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Cal is webby. Cal is emarginate. Cal is bombproof. Cal is grenadian. Cal is bent. Cal is basal. Hatti is emarginate. Hatti is bent. Hatti is basal. Janine is webby. Janine is emarginate. Janine is bombproof. Janine is grenadian. Janine is curtained. Janine is bent. Janine is basal. If someone is emarginate and webby then they are bombproof. All curtained, bent people are grenadian. All bent, emarginate people are curtained. Hatti is grenadian.", "logic": "\nWebby(cal)\nEmarginate(cal)\nBombproof(cal)\nGrenadian(cal)\nBent(cal)\nBasal(cal)\nEmarginate(hatti)\nBent(hatti)\nBasal(hatti)\nWebby(janine)\nEmarginate(janine)\nBombproof(janine)\nGrenadian(janine)\nCurtained(janine)\nBent(janine)\nBasal(janine)\nforall x (Emarginate(x) and Webby(x) -> Bombproof(x))\nforall x (Curtained(x) and Bent(x) -> Grenadian(x))\nforall x (Bent(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Curtained(x))\n\nGrenadian(hatti)\n\nBent(hatti) and Emarginate(hatti) and forall x (Bent(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Curtained(x)) -> therefore Curtained(hatti) Curtained(hatti) and Bent(hatti) and forall x (Curtained(x) and Bent(x) -> Grenadian(x)) -> therefore Grenadian(hatti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Briny is cushioned. Briny is ripened. Briny is amnestic. Briny is aboveboard. Briny is masterless. Briny is bimetallic. Connie is ripened. Connie is masterless. Connie is bimetallic. Claretta is cushioned. Claretta is ripened. Claretta is amnestic. Claretta is aboveboard. Claretta is eightieth. Claretta is masterless. Claretta is bimetallic. If someone is ripened and cushioned then they are amnestic. All eightieth, masterless people are aboveboard. All masterless, ripened people are eightieth. Connie is not aboveboard.", "logic": "\nCushioned(briny)\nRipened(briny)\nAmnestic(briny)\nAboveboard(briny)\nMasterless(briny)\nBimetallic(briny)\nRipened(connie)\nMasterless(connie)\nBimetallic(connie)\nCushioned(claretta)\nRipened(claretta)\nAmnestic(claretta)\nAboveboard(claretta)\nEightieth(claretta)\nMasterless(claretta)\nBimetallic(claretta)\nforall x (Ripened(x) and Cushioned(x) -> Amnestic(x))\nforall x (Eightieth(x) and Masterless(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) and Ripened(x) -> Eightieth(x))\n\nnot Aboveboard(connie)\n\nMasterless(connie) and Ripened(connie) and forall x (Masterless(x) and Ripened(x) -> Eightieth(x)) -> therefore Eightieth(connie) Eightieth(connie) and Masterless(connie) and forall x (Eightieth(x) and Masterless(x) -> Aboveboard(x)) -> therefore Aboveboard(connie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Polly is semidark. Polly is vexatious. Polly is former. Polly is motorized. Polly is cancelled. Polly is westbound. Delbert is vexatious. Delbert is cancelled. Delbert is westbound. Fey is semidark. Fey is vexatious. Fey is former. Fey is motorized. Fey is jaggy. Fey is cancelled. Fey is westbound. If someone is vexatious and semidark then they are former. All jaggy, cancelled people are motorized. All cancelled, vexatious people are jaggy. Delbert is not former.", "logic": "\nSemidark(polly)\nVexatious(polly)\nFormer(polly)\nMotorized(polly)\nCancelled(polly)\nWestbound(polly)\nVexatious(delbert)\nCancelled(delbert)\nWestbound(delbert)\nSemidark(fey)\nVexatious(fey)\nFormer(fey)\nMotorized(fey)\nJaggy(fey)\nCancelled(fey)\nWestbound(fey)\nforall x (Vexatious(x) and Semidark(x) -> Former(x))\nforall x (Jaggy(x) and Cancelled(x) -> Motorized(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Jaggy(x))\n\nnot Former(delbert)\n\nforall x (Vexatious(x) and Semidark(x) -> Former(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Robbin is unwished. Robbin is astounded. Robbin is blocked. Robbin is separated. Robbin is unseemly. Robbin is rhymeless. Karalynn is astounded. Karalynn is unseemly. Karalynn is rhymeless. Finley is unwished. Finley is astounded. Finley is blocked. Finley is separated. Finley is wavelike. Finley is unseemly. Finley is rhymeless. If someone is astounded and unwished then they are blocked. All wavelike, unseemly people are separated. All unseemly, astounded people are wavelike. Karalynn is unwished.", "logic": "\nUnwished(robbin)\nAstounded(robbin)\nBlocked(robbin)\nSeparated(robbin)\nUnseemly(robbin)\nRhymeless(robbin)\nAstounded(karalynn)\nUnseemly(karalynn)\nRhymeless(karalynn)\nUnwished(finley)\nAstounded(finley)\nBlocked(finley)\nSeparated(finley)\nWavelike(finley)\nUnseemly(finley)\nRhymeless(finley)\nforall x (Astounded(x) and Unwished(x) -> Blocked(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and Unseemly(x) -> Separated(x))\nforall x (Unseemly(x) and Astounded(x) -> Wavelike(x))\n\nUnwished(karalynn)\n\nUnwished(karalynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Winnah is ensuing. Dirk is broad. Pablo is surrounded. Furry, jamesian things are costal. If something is surrounded then it is jamesian. Pablo is surrounded.", "logic": "\nEnsuing(winnah)\nBroad(dirk)\nSurrounded(pablo)\nforall x (Surrounded(x) and Jamesian(x) -> Costal(x))\nforall x (Surrounded(x) -> Jamesian(x))\n\nSurrounded(pablo)\n\ntherefore Surrounded(pablo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Genia is cambodian. Uriel is arterial. Kathy is nonsense. Furry, endogamous things are tenebrious. If something is nonsense then it is endogamous. Genia is not cambodian.", "logic": "\nCambodian(genia)\nArterial(uriel)\nNonsense(kathy)\nforall x (Nonsense(x) and Endogamous(x) -> Tenebrious(x))\nforall x (Nonsense(x) -> Endogamous(x))\n\nnot Cambodian(genia)\n\ntherefore Cambodian(genia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Husain is purging. Tremaine is recursive. Marry is fastidious. Furry, cyprian things are unclad. If something is fastidious then it is cyprian. Marry is cyprian.", "logic": "\nPurging(husain)\nRecursive(tremaine)\nFastidious(marry)\nforall x (Fastidious(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Unclad(x))\nforall x (Fastidious(x) -> Cyprian(x))\n\nCyprian(marry)\n\nFastidious(marry) and forall x (Fastidious(x) -> Cyprian(x)) -> therefore Cyprian(marry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Lorna is preanal. Staford is unsoured. Lea is cinerary. Furry, generative things are noseless. If something is cinerary then it is generative. Lea is not generative.", "logic": "\nPreanal(lorna)\nUnsoured(staford)\nCinerary(lea)\nforall x (Cinerary(x) and Generative(x) -> Noseless(x))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) -> Generative(x))\n\nnot Generative(lea)\n\nCinerary(lea) and forall x (Cinerary(x) -> Generative(x)) -> therefore Generative(lea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Marcela is ninety. Ezra is flighty. Melva is perky. Furry, feral things are leprous. If something is perky then it is feral. Melva is leprous.", "logic": "\nNinety(marcela)\nFlighty(ezra)\nPerky(melva)\nforall x (Perky(x) and Feral(x) -> Leprous(x))\nforall x (Perky(x) -> Feral(x))\n\nLeprous(melva)\n\nPerky(melva) and forall x (Perky(x) -> Feral(x)) -> therefore Feral(melva) Perky(melva) and Feral(melva) and forall x (Perky(x) and Feral(x) -> Leprous(x)) -> therefore Leprous(melva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Rita is tickling. Emogene is sentient. Aeriell is propitious. Furry, charged things are chestnut. If something is propitious then it is charged. Aeriell is not chestnut.", "logic": "\nTickling(rita)\nSentient(emogene)\nPropitious(aeriell)\nforall x (Propitious(x) and Charged(x) -> Chestnut(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Charged(x))\n\nnot Chestnut(aeriell)\n\nPropitious(aeriell) and forall x (Propitious(x) -> Charged(x)) -> therefore Charged(aeriell) Propitious(aeriell) and Charged(aeriell) and forall x (Propitious(x) and Charged(x) -> Chestnut(x)) -> therefore Chestnut(aeriell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Kathi is taoist. Ephram is sculpted. Sidney is crosswise. Furry, jade things are subtle. If something is crosswise then it is jade. Kathi is not jade.", "logic": "\nTaoist(kathi)\nSculpted(ephram)\nCrosswise(sidney)\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and Jade(x) -> Subtle(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) -> Jade(x))\n\nnot Jade(kathi)\n\nforall x (Crosswise(x) -> Jade(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Philbert is unshaven. Lamar is mislaid. Maggi is unworried. Furry, isometric things are acrogenic. If something is unworried then it is isometric. Philbert is acrogenic.", "logic": "\nUnshaven(philbert)\nMislaid(lamar)\nUnworried(maggi)\nforall x (Unworried(x) and Isometric(x) -> Acrogenic(x))\nforall x (Unworried(x) -> Isometric(x))\n\nAcrogenic(philbert)\n\nforall x (Unworried(x) and Isometric(x) -> Acrogenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Wynton is masonic. Gerrilee is quintuple. Kiley is taoist. Furry, practised things are socialised. If something is taoist then it is practised. Gerrilee is not socialised.", "logic": "\nMasonic(wynton)\nQuintuple(gerrilee)\nTaoist(kiley)\nforall x (Taoist(x) and Practised(x) -> Socialised(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) -> Practised(x))\n\nnot Socialised(gerrilee)\n\nforall x (Taoist(x) and Practised(x) -> Socialised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Bel is rhythmic. Sheryl is doglike. Nadia is mined. Furry, alpestrine things are swagger. If something is mined then it is alpestrine. Nadia is rhythmic.", "logic": "\nRhythmic(bel)\nDoglike(sheryl)\nMined(nadia)\nforall x (Mined(x) and Alpestrine(x) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\n\nRhythmic(nadia)\n\nRhythmic(nadia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Koressa is transitive. Lazar is probable. Brina is cliched. Furry, effortful things are pastoral. If something is cliched then it is effortful. Koressa is not cliched.", "logic": "\nTransitive(koressa)\nProbable(lazar)\nCliched(brina)\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Effortful(x) -> Pastoral(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Effortful(x))\n\nnot Cliched(koressa)\n\nnot Cliched(koressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Evania is blase. Stan is thousand. Dorris is oviform. Furry, disordered things are glorified. If something is oviform then it is disordered. Stan is oviform.", "logic": "\nBlase(evania)\nThousand(stan)\nOviform(dorris)\nforall x (Oviform(x) and Disordered(x) -> Glorified(x))\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Disordered(x))\n\nOviform(stan)\n\nOviform(stan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1615"} {"premises": "Breanne is estival. Breanne is solemn. Breanne is pedigreed. Breanne is unassigned. Karlie is estival. Karlie is solemn. Karlie is leading. Karlie is unassigned. Karlie is nasty. Karlie is growing. Smart, solemn things are leading. If Karlie is pedigreed then Karlie is leading. Blue, unassigned things are nasty. If Karlie is estival and Karlie is growing then Karlie is leading. All solemn things are estival. Blue, solemn things are nasty. If something is leading then it is unassigned. If something is unassigned and pedigreed then it is estival. Karlie is nasty.", "logic": "\nEstival(breanne)\nSolemn(breanne)\nPedigreed(breanne)\nUnassigned(breanne)\nEstival(karlie)\nSolemn(karlie)\nLeading(karlie)\nUnassigned(karlie)\nNasty(karlie)\nGrowing(karlie)\nforall x (Nasty(x) and Solemn(x) -> Leading(x))\nPedigreed(karlie) -> Leading(karlie)\nforall x (Estival(x) and Unassigned(x) -> Nasty(x))\nEstival(karlie) and Growing(karlie) -> Leading(karlie)\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Estival(x))\nforall x (Estival(x) and Solemn(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) -> Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> Estival(x))\n\nNasty(karlie)\n\ntherefore Nasty(karlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Kennedy is seasoned. Kennedy is ancestral. Kennedy is orphaned. Kennedy is sabbatical. Caroljean is seasoned. Caroljean is ancestral. Caroljean is allotted. Caroljean is sabbatical. Caroljean is sportive. Caroljean is pyretic. Smart, ancestral things are allotted. If Caroljean is orphaned then Caroljean is allotted. Blue, sabbatical things are sportive. If Caroljean is seasoned and Caroljean is pyretic then Caroljean is allotted. All ancestral things are seasoned. Blue, ancestral things are sportive. If something is allotted then it is sabbatical. If something is sabbatical and orphaned then it is seasoned. Caroljean is not sabbatical.", "logic": "\nSeasoned(kennedy)\nAncestral(kennedy)\nOrphaned(kennedy)\nSabbatical(kennedy)\nSeasoned(caroljean)\nAncestral(caroljean)\nAllotted(caroljean)\nSabbatical(caroljean)\nSportive(caroljean)\nPyretic(caroljean)\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Ancestral(x) -> Allotted(x))\nOrphaned(caroljean) -> Allotted(caroljean)\nforall x (Seasoned(x) and Sabbatical(x) -> Sportive(x))\nSeasoned(caroljean) and Pyretic(caroljean) -> Allotted(caroljean)\nforall x (Ancestral(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) and Ancestral(x) -> Sportive(x))\nforall x (Allotted(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\nforall x (Sabbatical(x) and Orphaned(x) -> Seasoned(x))\n\nnot Sabbatical(caroljean)\n\ntherefore Sabbatical(caroljean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Merle is talismanic. Merle is viral. Merle is isentropic. Merle is hifalutin. Barny is talismanic. Barny is viral. Barny is treble. Barny is hifalutin. Barny is elating. Barny is lucifugal. Smart, viral things are treble. If Barny is isentropic then Barny is treble. Blue, hifalutin things are elating. If Barny is talismanic and Barny is lucifugal then Barny is treble. All viral things are talismanic. Blue, viral things are elating. If something is treble then it is hifalutin. If something is hifalutin and isentropic then it is talismanic. Merle is elating.", "logic": "\nTalismanic(merle)\nViral(merle)\nIsentropic(merle)\nHifalutin(merle)\nTalismanic(barny)\nViral(barny)\nTreble(barny)\nHifalutin(barny)\nElating(barny)\nLucifugal(barny)\nforall x (Elating(x) and Viral(x) -> Treble(x))\nIsentropic(barny) -> Treble(barny)\nforall x (Talismanic(x) and Hifalutin(x) -> Elating(x))\nTalismanic(barny) and Lucifugal(barny) -> Treble(barny)\nforall x (Viral(x) -> Talismanic(x))\nforall x (Talismanic(x) and Viral(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Treble(x) -> Hifalutin(x))\nforall x (Hifalutin(x) and Isentropic(x) -> Talismanic(x))\n\nElating(merle)\n\nTalismanic(merle) and Viral(merle) and forall x (Talismanic(x) and Viral(x) -> Elating(x)) -> therefore Elating(merle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Heddie is tender. Heddie is aramaic. Heddie is abhorrent. Heddie is saute. Tuck is tender. Tuck is aramaic. Tuck is tubelike. Tuck is saute. Tuck is squab. Tuck is effectual. Smart, aramaic things are tubelike. If Tuck is abhorrent then Tuck is tubelike. Blue, saute things are squab. If Tuck is tender and Tuck is effectual then Tuck is tubelike. All aramaic things are tender. Blue, aramaic things are squab. If something is tubelike then it is saute. If something is saute and abhorrent then it is tender. Heddie is not squab.", "logic": "\nTender(heddie)\nAramaic(heddie)\nAbhorrent(heddie)\nSaute(heddie)\nTender(tuck)\nAramaic(tuck)\nTubelike(tuck)\nSaute(tuck)\nSquab(tuck)\nEffectual(tuck)\nforall x (Squab(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Tubelike(x))\nAbhorrent(tuck) -> Tubelike(tuck)\nforall x (Tender(x) and Saute(x) -> Squab(x))\nTender(tuck) and Effectual(tuck) -> Tubelike(tuck)\nforall x (Aramaic(x) -> Tender(x))\nforall x (Tender(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) -> Saute(x))\nforall x (Saute(x) and Abhorrent(x) -> Tender(x))\n\nnot Squab(heddie)\n\nTender(heddie) and Aramaic(heddie) and forall x (Tender(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Squab(x)) -> therefore Squab(heddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Moe is bounderish. Moe is denuded. Moe is sheer. Moe is untapped. Ashley is bounderish. Ashley is denuded. Ashley is neuronic. Ashley is untapped. Ashley is cimmerian. Ashley is inaudible. Smart, denuded things are neuronic. If Ashley is sheer then Ashley is neuronic. Blue, untapped things are cimmerian. If Ashley is bounderish and Ashley is inaudible then Ashley is neuronic. All denuded things are bounderish. Blue, denuded things are cimmerian. If something is neuronic then it is untapped. If something is untapped and sheer then it is bounderish. Moe is neuronic.", "logic": "\nBounderish(moe)\nDenuded(moe)\nSheer(moe)\nUntapped(moe)\nBounderish(ashley)\nDenuded(ashley)\nNeuronic(ashley)\nUntapped(ashley)\nCimmerian(ashley)\nInaudible(ashley)\nforall x (Cimmerian(x) and Denuded(x) -> Neuronic(x))\nSheer(ashley) -> Neuronic(ashley)\nforall x (Bounderish(x) and Untapped(x) -> Cimmerian(x))\nBounderish(ashley) and Inaudible(ashley) -> Neuronic(ashley)\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Bounderish(x))\nforall x (Bounderish(x) and Denuded(x) -> Cimmerian(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) and Sheer(x) -> Bounderish(x))\n\nNeuronic(moe)\n\nBounderish(moe) and Denuded(moe) and forall x (Bounderish(x) and Denuded(x) -> Cimmerian(x)) -> therefore Cimmerian(moe) Cimmerian(moe) and Denuded(moe) and forall x (Cimmerian(x) and Denuded(x) -> Neuronic(x)) -> therefore Neuronic(moe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Teena is corporal. Teena is platelike. Teena is voracious. Teena is drawn. Tybi is corporal. Tybi is platelike. Tybi is costive. Tybi is drawn. Tybi is nonspatial. Tybi is steady. Smart, platelike things are costive. If Tybi is voracious then Tybi is costive. Blue, drawn things are nonspatial. If Tybi is corporal and Tybi is steady then Tybi is costive. All platelike things are corporal. Blue, platelike things are nonspatial. If something is costive then it is drawn. If something is drawn and voracious then it is corporal. Teena is not costive.", "logic": "\nCorporal(teena)\nPlatelike(teena)\nVoracious(teena)\nDrawn(teena)\nCorporal(tybi)\nPlatelike(tybi)\nCostive(tybi)\nDrawn(tybi)\nNonspatial(tybi)\nSteady(tybi)\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) and Platelike(x) -> Costive(x))\nVoracious(tybi) -> Costive(tybi)\nforall x (Corporal(x) and Drawn(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nCorporal(tybi) and Steady(tybi) -> Costive(tybi)\nforall x (Platelike(x) -> Corporal(x))\nforall x (Corporal(x) and Platelike(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) and Voracious(x) -> Corporal(x))\n\nnot Costive(teena)\n\nCorporal(teena) and Platelike(teena) and forall x (Corporal(x) and Platelike(x) -> Nonspatial(x)) -> therefore Nonspatial(teena) Nonspatial(teena) and Platelike(teena) and forall x (Nonspatial(x) and Platelike(x) -> Costive(x)) -> therefore Costive(teena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Ede is feathery. Ede is copesettic. Ede is actinal. Ede is hairless. Harrietta is feathery. Harrietta is copesettic. Harrietta is main. Harrietta is hairless. Harrietta is couthie. Harrietta is patchy. Smart, copesettic things are main. If Harrietta is actinal then Harrietta is main. Blue, hairless things are couthie. If Harrietta is feathery and Harrietta is patchy then Harrietta is main. All copesettic things are feathery. Blue, copesettic things are couthie. If something is main then it is hairless. If something is hairless and actinal then it is feathery. Harrietta is not actinal.", "logic": "\nFeathery(ede)\nCopesettic(ede)\nActinal(ede)\nHairless(ede)\nFeathery(harrietta)\nCopesettic(harrietta)\nMain(harrietta)\nHairless(harrietta)\nCouthie(harrietta)\nPatchy(harrietta)\nforall x (Couthie(x) and Copesettic(x) -> Main(x))\nActinal(harrietta) -> Main(harrietta)\nforall x (Feathery(x) and Hairless(x) -> Couthie(x))\nFeathery(harrietta) and Patchy(harrietta) -> Main(harrietta)\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Feathery(x))\nforall x (Feathery(x) and Copesettic(x) -> Couthie(x))\nforall x (Main(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) and Actinal(x) -> Feathery(x))\n\nnot Actinal(harrietta)\n\nnot Actinal(harrietta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Erasmus is whiskered. Erasmus is utility. Erasmus is open. Erasmus is confused. Joleen is whiskered. Joleen is utility. Joleen is pontifical. Joleen is confused. Joleen is stark. Joleen is converse. Smart, utility things are pontifical. If Joleen is open then Joleen is pontifical. Blue, confused things are stark. If Joleen is whiskered and Joleen is converse then Joleen is pontifical. All utility things are whiskered. Blue, utility things are stark. If something is pontifical then it is confused. If something is confused and open then it is whiskered. Erasmus is converse.", "logic": "\nWhiskered(erasmus)\nUtility(erasmus)\nOpen(erasmus)\nConfused(erasmus)\nWhiskered(joleen)\nUtility(joleen)\nPontifical(joleen)\nConfused(joleen)\nStark(joleen)\nConverse(joleen)\nforall x (Stark(x) and Utility(x) -> Pontifical(x))\nOpen(joleen) -> Pontifical(joleen)\nforall x (Whiskered(x) and Confused(x) -> Stark(x))\nWhiskered(joleen) and Converse(joleen) -> Pontifical(joleen)\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Whiskered(x))\nforall x (Whiskered(x) and Utility(x) -> Stark(x))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> Confused(x))\nforall x (Confused(x) and Open(x) -> Whiskered(x))\n\nConverse(erasmus)\n\nConverse(erasmus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "The west is orbital. The west is isotropic. The west is crazy. The west shorten the roseann. The roseann preisolate the west. The roseann is aculeate. The roseann is not orbital. The roseann is venous. The roseann is isotropic. The roseann is not crazy. The roseann emit the west. The roseann shorten the west. If someone emit the west then the west preisolate the roseann. If someone preisolate the roseann then they like the west. The west shorten the roseann.", "logic": "\nOrbital(west)\nIsotropic(west)\nCrazy(west)\nShorten(west, roseann)\nPreisolate(roseann, west)\nAculeate(roseann)\nnot Orbital(roseann)\nVenous(roseann)\nIsotropic(roseann)\nnot Crazy(roseann)\nEmit(roseann, west)\nShorten(roseann, west)\nforall x (Emit(x, west) -> Preisolate(west, roseann))\nforall x (Preisolate(x, roseann) -> Emit(x, west))\n\nShorten(west, roseann)\n\ntherefore Shorten(west, roseann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The louie is superable. The louie is sooty. The louie is anticlinal. The louie unfrock the coriss. The coriss colligate the louie. The coriss is scots. The coriss is not superable. The coriss is carefree. The coriss is sooty. The coriss is not anticlinal. The coriss relate the louie. The coriss unfrock the louie. If someone relate the louie then the louie colligate the coriss. If someone colligate the coriss then they like the louie. The coriss is not carefree.", "logic": "\nSuperable(louie)\nSooty(louie)\nAnticlinal(louie)\nUnfrock(louie, coriss)\nColligate(coriss, louie)\nScots(coriss)\nnot Superable(coriss)\nCarefree(coriss)\nSooty(coriss)\nnot Anticlinal(coriss)\nRelate(coriss, louie)\nUnfrock(coriss, louie)\nforall x (Relate(x, louie) -> Colligate(louie, coriss))\nforall x (Colligate(x, coriss) -> Relate(x, louie))\n\nnot Carefree(coriss)\n\ntherefore Carefree(coriss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The kyrstin is appointive. The kyrstin is hysteric. The kyrstin is downmarket. The kyrstin manumit the maurene. The maurene excise the kyrstin. The maurene is salted. The maurene is not appointive. The maurene is exuberant. The maurene is hysteric. The maurene is not downmarket. The maurene comment the kyrstin. The maurene manumit the kyrstin. If someone comment the kyrstin then the kyrstin excise the maurene. If someone excise the maurene then they like the kyrstin. The kyrstin excise the maurene.", "logic": "\nAppointive(kyrstin)\nHysteric(kyrstin)\nDownmarket(kyrstin)\nManumit(kyrstin, maurene)\nExcise(maurene, kyrstin)\nSalted(maurene)\nnot Appointive(maurene)\nExuberant(maurene)\nHysteric(maurene)\nnot Downmarket(maurene)\nComment(maurene, kyrstin)\nManumit(maurene, kyrstin)\nforall x (Comment(x, kyrstin) -> Excise(kyrstin, maurene))\nforall x (Excise(x, maurene) -> Comment(x, kyrstin))\n\nExcise(kyrstin, maurene)\n\nComment(maurene, kyrstin) and forall x (Comment(x, kyrstin) -> Excise(kyrstin, maurene)) -> therefore Excise(kyrstin, maurene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The trudy is lapsed. The trudy is sapphire. The trudy is haemal. The trudy snitch the hamlin. The hamlin phone the trudy. The hamlin is puerperal. The hamlin is not lapsed. The hamlin is fabian. The hamlin is sapphire. The hamlin is not haemal. The hamlin diverge the trudy. The hamlin snitch the trudy. If someone diverge the trudy then the trudy phone the hamlin. If someone phone the hamlin then they like the trudy. The trudy does not eat the hamlin.", "logic": "\nLapsed(trudy)\nSapphire(trudy)\nHaemal(trudy)\nSnitch(trudy, hamlin)\nPhone(hamlin, trudy)\nPuerperal(hamlin)\nnot Lapsed(hamlin)\nFabian(hamlin)\nSapphire(hamlin)\nnot Haemal(hamlin)\nDiverge(hamlin, trudy)\nSnitch(hamlin, trudy)\nforall x (Diverge(x, trudy) -> Phone(trudy, hamlin))\nforall x (Phone(x, hamlin) -> Diverge(x, trudy))\n\nnot Phone(trudy, hamlin)\n\nDiverge(hamlin, trudy) and forall x (Diverge(x, trudy) -> Phone(trudy, hamlin)) -> therefore Phone(trudy, hamlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The orsa is odorous. The orsa is specious. The orsa is branded. The orsa expand the cybel. The cybel abrade the orsa. The cybel is hispanic. The cybel is not odorous. The cybel is baptistic. The cybel is specious. The cybel is not branded. The cybel camber the orsa. The cybel expand the orsa. If someone camber the orsa then the orsa abrade the cybel. If someone abrade the cybel then they like the orsa. The orsa camber the orsa.", "logic": "\nOdorous(orsa)\nSpecious(orsa)\nBranded(orsa)\nExpand(orsa, cybel)\nAbrade(cybel, orsa)\nHispanic(cybel)\nnot Odorous(cybel)\nBaptistic(cybel)\nSpecious(cybel)\nnot Branded(cybel)\nCamber(cybel, orsa)\nExpand(cybel, orsa)\nforall x (Camber(x, orsa) -> Abrade(orsa, cybel))\nforall x (Abrade(x, cybel) -> Camber(x, orsa))\n\nCamber(orsa, orsa)\n\nCamber(cybel, orsa) and forall x (Camber(x, orsa) -> Abrade(orsa, cybel)) -> therefore Abrade(orsa, cybel) Abrade(orsa, cybel) and forall x (Abrade(x, cybel) -> Camber(x, orsa)) -> therefore Camber(orsa, orsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The marvin is ameboid. The marvin is inst. The marvin is horizontal. The marvin emulate the blondelle. The blondelle retract the marvin. The blondelle is waste. The blondelle is not ameboid. The blondelle is solo. The blondelle is inst. The blondelle is not horizontal. The blondelle appear the marvin. The blondelle emulate the marvin. If someone appear the marvin then the marvin retract the blondelle. If someone retract the blondelle then they like the marvin. The marvin does not like the marvin.", "logic": "\nAmeboid(marvin)\nInst(marvin)\nHorizontal(marvin)\nEmulate(marvin, blondelle)\nRetract(blondelle, marvin)\nWaste(blondelle)\nnot Ameboid(blondelle)\nSolo(blondelle)\nInst(blondelle)\nnot Horizontal(blondelle)\nAppear(blondelle, marvin)\nEmulate(blondelle, marvin)\nforall x (Appear(x, marvin) -> Retract(marvin, blondelle))\nforall x (Retract(x, blondelle) -> Appear(x, marvin))\n\nnot Appear(marvin, marvin)\n\nAppear(blondelle, marvin) and forall x (Appear(x, marvin) -> Retract(marvin, blondelle)) -> therefore Retract(marvin, blondelle) Retract(marvin, blondelle) and forall x (Retract(x, blondelle) -> Appear(x, marvin)) -> therefore Appear(marvin, marvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The julietta is freeborn. The julietta is unerring. The julietta is cuddlesome. The julietta evidence the mandi. The mandi rhapsodize the julietta. The mandi is dismayed. The mandi is not freeborn. The mandi is endogenous. The mandi is unerring. The mandi is not cuddlesome. The mandi proof the julietta. The mandi evidence the julietta. If someone proof the julietta then the julietta rhapsodize the mandi. If someone rhapsodize the mandi then they like the julietta. The julietta does not eat the julietta.", "logic": "\nFreeborn(julietta)\nUnerring(julietta)\nCuddlesome(julietta)\nEvidence(julietta, mandi)\nRhapsodize(mandi, julietta)\nDismayed(mandi)\nnot Freeborn(mandi)\nEndogenous(mandi)\nUnerring(mandi)\nnot Cuddlesome(mandi)\nProof(mandi, julietta)\nEvidence(mandi, julietta)\nforall x (Proof(x, julietta) -> Rhapsodize(julietta, mandi))\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, mandi) -> Proof(x, julietta))\n\nnot Rhapsodize(julietta, julietta)\n\nnot Rhapsodize(julietta, julietta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The adrianna is ingrowing. The adrianna is situated. The adrianna is corrugated. The adrianna slander the alejandro. The alejandro brief the adrianna. The alejandro is norse. The alejandro is not ingrowing. The alejandro is abbatial. The alejandro is situated. The alejandro is not corrugated. The alejandro chamfer the adrianna. The alejandro slander the adrianna. If someone chamfer the adrianna then the adrianna brief the alejandro. If someone brief the alejandro then they like the adrianna. The adrianna slander the adrianna.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(adrianna)\nSituated(adrianna)\nCorrugated(adrianna)\nSlander(adrianna, alejandro)\nBrief(alejandro, adrianna)\nNorse(alejandro)\nnot Ingrowing(alejandro)\nAbbatial(alejandro)\nSituated(alejandro)\nnot Corrugated(alejandro)\nChamfer(alejandro, adrianna)\nSlander(alejandro, adrianna)\nforall x (Chamfer(x, adrianna) -> Brief(adrianna, alejandro))\nforall x (Brief(x, alejandro) -> Chamfer(x, adrianna))\n\nSlander(adrianna, adrianna)\n\nSlander(adrianna, adrianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The sinclare is agonised. The sinclare is latin. The sinclare is erosive. The sinclare jail the simona. The simona conjoin the sinclare. The simona is nostalgic. The simona is not agonised. The simona is much. The simona is latin. The simona is not erosive. The simona cark the sinclare. The simona jail the sinclare. If someone cark the sinclare then the sinclare conjoin the simona. If someone conjoin the simona then they like the sinclare. The sinclare does not like the simona.", "logic": "\nAgonised(sinclare)\nLatin(sinclare)\nErosive(sinclare)\nJail(sinclare, simona)\nConjoin(simona, sinclare)\nNostalgic(simona)\nnot Agonised(simona)\nMuch(simona)\nLatin(simona)\nnot Erosive(simona)\nCark(simona, sinclare)\nJail(simona, sinclare)\nforall x (Cark(x, sinclare) -> Conjoin(sinclare, simona))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, simona) -> Cark(x, sinclare))\n\nnot Cark(sinclare, simona)\n\nnot Cark(sinclare, simona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The elfrieda is uneven. The elfrieda is wary. The elfrieda is haitian. The elfrieda undersell the earle. The earle finalize the elfrieda. The earle is fourpenny. The earle is not uneven. The earle is wrathful. The earle is wary. The earle is not haitian. The earle picket the elfrieda. The earle undersell the elfrieda. If someone picket the elfrieda then the elfrieda finalize the earle. If someone finalize the earle then they like the elfrieda. The earle finalize the earle.", "logic": "\nUneven(elfrieda)\nWary(elfrieda)\nHaitian(elfrieda)\nUndersell(elfrieda, earle)\nFinalize(earle, elfrieda)\nFourpenny(earle)\nnot Uneven(earle)\nWrathful(earle)\nWary(earle)\nnot Haitian(earle)\nPicket(earle, elfrieda)\nUndersell(earle, elfrieda)\nforall x (Picket(x, elfrieda) -> Finalize(elfrieda, earle))\nforall x (Finalize(x, earle) -> Picket(x, elfrieda))\n\nFinalize(earle, earle)\n\nFinalize(earle, earle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The eve is enchanted. The eve is rhombic. The eve is toothless. The eve spue the lira. The lira souse the eve. The lira is fleecy. The lira is not enchanted. The lira is foaming. The lira is rhombic. The lira is not toothless. The lira crib the eve. The lira spue the eve. If someone crib the eve then the eve souse the lira. If someone souse the lira then they like the eve. The eve is not foaming.", "logic": "\nEnchanted(eve)\nRhombic(eve)\nToothless(eve)\nSpue(eve, lira)\nSouse(lira, eve)\nFleecy(lira)\nnot Enchanted(lira)\nFoaming(lira)\nRhombic(lira)\nnot Toothless(lira)\nCrib(lira, eve)\nSpue(lira, eve)\nforall x (Crib(x, eve) -> Souse(eve, lira))\nforall x (Souse(x, lira) -> Crib(x, eve))\n\nnot Foaming(eve)\n\nnot Foaming(eve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The audrey is trojan. The audrey is transposed. The audrey is conducive. The audrey grate the tre. The tre dowse the audrey. The tre is puissant. The tre is not trojan. The tre is renunciant. The tre is transposed. The tre is not conducive. The tre sanitate the audrey. The tre grate the audrey. If someone sanitate the audrey then the audrey dowse the tre. If someone dowse the tre then they like the audrey. The tre sanitate the tre.", "logic": "\nTrojan(audrey)\nTransposed(audrey)\nConducive(audrey)\nGrate(audrey, tre)\nDowse(tre, audrey)\nPuissant(tre)\nnot Trojan(tre)\nRenunciant(tre)\nTransposed(tre)\nnot Conducive(tre)\nSanitate(tre, audrey)\nGrate(tre, audrey)\nforall x (Sanitate(x, audrey) -> Dowse(audrey, tre))\nforall x (Dowse(x, tre) -> Sanitate(x, audrey))\n\nSanitate(tre, tre)\n\nSanitate(tre, tre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Guillermo is scarce. Guillermo is isomorphic. Guillermo is octagonal. Guillermo is reborn. Guillermo is unbeatable. Flin is scarce. Flin is blighted. Flin is planar. Flin is isomorphic. Flin is octagonal. Flin is reborn. Flin is unbeatable. Leanne is scarce. Leanne is planar. Leanne is reborn. If someone is blighted and not planar then they are not octagonal. Round people are octagonal. If someone is scarce then they are unbeatable. Guillermo is isomorphic.", "logic": "\nScarce(guillermo)\nIsomorphic(guillermo)\nOctagonal(guillermo)\nReborn(guillermo)\nUnbeatable(guillermo)\nScarce(flin)\nBlighted(flin)\nPlanar(flin)\nIsomorphic(flin)\nOctagonal(flin)\nReborn(flin)\nUnbeatable(flin)\nScarce(leanne)\nPlanar(leanne)\nReborn(leanne)\nforall x (Blighted(x) and not Planar(x) -> not Octagonal(x))\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) -> Octagonal(x))\nforall x (Scarce(x) -> Unbeatable(x))\n\nIsomorphic(guillermo)\n\ntherefore Isomorphic(guillermo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Odette is quaint. Odette is unifoliate. Odette is utile. Odette is noteworthy. Odette is tudor. Noah is quaint. Noah is sneaky. Noah is reedlike. Noah is unifoliate. Noah is utile. Noah is noteworthy. Noah is tudor. Ailene is quaint. Ailene is reedlike. Ailene is noteworthy. If someone is sneaky and not reedlike then they are not utile. Round people are utile. If someone is quaint then they are tudor. Noah is not sneaky.", "logic": "\nQuaint(odette)\nUnifoliate(odette)\nUtile(odette)\nNoteworthy(odette)\nTudor(odette)\nQuaint(noah)\nSneaky(noah)\nReedlike(noah)\nUnifoliate(noah)\nUtile(noah)\nNoteworthy(noah)\nTudor(noah)\nQuaint(ailene)\nReedlike(ailene)\nNoteworthy(ailene)\nforall x (Sneaky(x) and not Reedlike(x) -> not Utile(x))\nforall x (Tudor(x) -> Utile(x))\nforall x (Quaint(x) -> Tudor(x))\n\nnot Sneaky(noah)\n\ntherefore Sneaky(noah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Janet is uneven. Janet is onomastic. Janet is unwanted. Janet is noseless. Janet is pungent. Lolande is uneven. Lolande is unsanitary. Lolande is precedent. Lolande is onomastic. Lolande is unwanted. Lolande is noseless. Lolande is pungent. Paddy is uneven. Paddy is precedent. Paddy is noseless. If someone is unsanitary and not precedent then they are not unwanted. Round people are unwanted. If someone is uneven then they are pungent. Paddy is pungent.", "logic": "\nUneven(janet)\nOnomastic(janet)\nUnwanted(janet)\nNoseless(janet)\nPungent(janet)\nUneven(lolande)\nUnsanitary(lolande)\nPrecedent(lolande)\nOnomastic(lolande)\nUnwanted(lolande)\nNoseless(lolande)\nPungent(lolande)\nUneven(paddy)\nPrecedent(paddy)\nNoseless(paddy)\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) and not Precedent(x) -> not Unwanted(x))\nforall x (Pungent(x) -> Unwanted(x))\nforall x (Uneven(x) -> Pungent(x))\n\nPungent(paddy)\n\nUneven(paddy) and forall x (Uneven(x) -> Pungent(x)) -> therefore Pungent(paddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Gerold is retrousse. Gerold is unfamiliar. Gerold is uncoated. Gerold is highbrow. Gerold is official. Kirsteni is retrousse. Kirsteni is adjuvant. Kirsteni is gradual. Kirsteni is unfamiliar. Kirsteni is uncoated. Kirsteni is highbrow. Kirsteni is official. Auguste is retrousse. Auguste is gradual. Auguste is highbrow. If someone is adjuvant and not gradual then they are not uncoated. Round people are uncoated. If someone is retrousse then they are official. Auguste is not official.", "logic": "\nRetrousse(gerold)\nUnfamiliar(gerold)\nUncoated(gerold)\nHighbrow(gerold)\nOfficial(gerold)\nRetrousse(kirsteni)\nAdjuvant(kirsteni)\nGradual(kirsteni)\nUnfamiliar(kirsteni)\nUncoated(kirsteni)\nHighbrow(kirsteni)\nOfficial(kirsteni)\nRetrousse(auguste)\nGradual(auguste)\nHighbrow(auguste)\nforall x (Adjuvant(x) and not Gradual(x) -> not Uncoated(x))\nforall x (Official(x) -> Uncoated(x))\nforall x (Retrousse(x) -> Official(x))\n\nnot Official(auguste)\n\nRetrousse(auguste) and forall x (Retrousse(x) -> Official(x)) -> therefore Official(auguste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Jenette is tillable. Jenette is pyogenic. Jenette is sulky. Jenette is bichrome. Jenette is valiant. Tabby is tillable. Tabby is reticulate. Tabby is crenulated. Tabby is pyogenic. Tabby is sulky. Tabby is bichrome. Tabby is valiant. Bernhard is tillable. Bernhard is crenulated. Bernhard is bichrome. If someone is reticulate and not crenulated then they are not sulky. Round people are sulky. If someone is tillable then they are valiant. Bernhard is sulky.", "logic": "\nTillable(jenette)\nPyogenic(jenette)\nSulky(jenette)\nBichrome(jenette)\nValiant(jenette)\nTillable(tabby)\nReticulate(tabby)\nCrenulated(tabby)\nPyogenic(tabby)\nSulky(tabby)\nBichrome(tabby)\nValiant(tabby)\nTillable(bernhard)\nCrenulated(bernhard)\nBichrome(bernhard)\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and not Crenulated(x) -> not Sulky(x))\nforall x (Valiant(x) -> Sulky(x))\nforall x (Tillable(x) -> Valiant(x))\n\nSulky(bernhard)\n\nTillable(bernhard) and forall x (Tillable(x) -> Valiant(x)) -> therefore Valiant(bernhard) Valiant(bernhard) and forall x (Valiant(x) -> Sulky(x)) -> therefore Sulky(bernhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Ree is voltaic. Ree is aoristic. Ree is answerable. Ree is unarmoured. Ree is civilian. Teresa is voltaic. Teresa is sciolistic. Teresa is hymeneal. Teresa is aoristic. Teresa is answerable. Teresa is unarmoured. Teresa is civilian. Martainn is voltaic. Martainn is hymeneal. Martainn is unarmoured. If someone is sciolistic and not hymeneal then they are not answerable. Round people are answerable. If someone is voltaic then they are civilian. Martainn is not answerable.", "logic": "\nVoltaic(ree)\nAoristic(ree)\nAnswerable(ree)\nUnarmoured(ree)\nCivilian(ree)\nVoltaic(teresa)\nSciolistic(teresa)\nHymeneal(teresa)\nAoristic(teresa)\nAnswerable(teresa)\nUnarmoured(teresa)\nCivilian(teresa)\nVoltaic(martainn)\nHymeneal(martainn)\nUnarmoured(martainn)\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) and not Hymeneal(x) -> not Answerable(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Answerable(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) -> Civilian(x))\n\nnot Answerable(martainn)\n\nVoltaic(martainn) and forall x (Voltaic(x) -> Civilian(x)) -> therefore Civilian(martainn) Civilian(martainn) and forall x (Civilian(x) -> Answerable(x)) -> therefore Answerable(martainn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Odelle is unfading. Odelle is easterly. Odelle is wounded. Odelle is obscure. Odelle is incised. Hamlin is unfading. Hamlin is abstract. Hamlin is tenebrious. Hamlin is easterly. Hamlin is wounded. Hamlin is obscure. Hamlin is incised. Calli is unfading. Calli is tenebrious. Calli is obscure. If someone is abstract and not tenebrious then they are not wounded. Round people are wounded. If someone is unfading then they are incised. Odelle is not abstract.", "logic": "\nUnfading(odelle)\nEasterly(odelle)\nWounded(odelle)\nObscure(odelle)\nIncised(odelle)\nUnfading(hamlin)\nAbstract(hamlin)\nTenebrious(hamlin)\nEasterly(hamlin)\nWounded(hamlin)\nObscure(hamlin)\nIncised(hamlin)\nUnfading(calli)\nTenebrious(calli)\nObscure(calli)\nforall x (Abstract(x) and not Tenebrious(x) -> not Wounded(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) -> Wounded(x))\nforall x (Unfading(x) -> Incised(x))\n\nnot Abstract(odelle)\n\nnot Abstract(odelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Hiralal is oversize. Hiralal is mired. Hiralal is retral. Hiralal is cruciate. Hiralal is sparse. Carmon is oversize. Carmon is varicose. Carmon is poky. Carmon is mired. Carmon is retral. Carmon is cruciate. Carmon is sparse. Dwight is oversize. Dwight is poky. Dwight is cruciate. If someone is varicose and not poky then they are not retral. Round people are retral. If someone is oversize then they are sparse. Dwight is varicose.", "logic": "\nOversize(hiralal)\nMired(hiralal)\nRetral(hiralal)\nCruciate(hiralal)\nSparse(hiralal)\nOversize(carmon)\nVaricose(carmon)\nPoky(carmon)\nMired(carmon)\nRetral(carmon)\nCruciate(carmon)\nSparse(carmon)\nOversize(dwight)\nPoky(dwight)\nCruciate(dwight)\nforall x (Varicose(x) and not Poky(x) -> not Retral(x))\nforall x (Sparse(x) -> Retral(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) -> Sparse(x))\n\nVaricose(dwight)\n\nVaricose(dwight) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Shanan is homebound. Shanan is ascending. Shanan is vigesimal. Shanan is multiplex. Shanan is formulaic. Silvana is homebound. Silvana is trifid. Silvana is motorised. Silvana is ascending. Silvana is vigesimal. Silvana is multiplex. Silvana is formulaic. Daniella is homebound. Daniella is motorised. Daniella is multiplex. If someone is trifid and not motorised then they are not vigesimal. Round people are vigesimal. If someone is homebound then they are formulaic. Daniella is not ascending.", "logic": "\nHomebound(shanan)\nAscending(shanan)\nVigesimal(shanan)\nMultiplex(shanan)\nFormulaic(shanan)\nHomebound(silvana)\nTrifid(silvana)\nMotorised(silvana)\nAscending(silvana)\nVigesimal(silvana)\nMultiplex(silvana)\nFormulaic(silvana)\nHomebound(daniella)\nMotorised(daniella)\nMultiplex(daniella)\nforall x (Trifid(x) and not Motorised(x) -> not Vigesimal(x))\nforall x (Formulaic(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Formulaic(x))\n\nnot Ascending(daniella)\n\nnot Ascending(daniella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Boyd is ungraded. Boyd is irritative. Boyd is unworried. Boyd is pupillary. Boyd is unstilted. Ladonna is ungraded. Ladonna is partial. Ladonna is betting. Ladonna is irritative. Ladonna is unworried. Ladonna is pupillary. Ladonna is unstilted. Zack is ungraded. Zack is betting. Zack is pupillary. If someone is partial and not betting then they are not unworried. Round people are unworried. If someone is ungraded then they are unstilted. Boyd is betting.", "logic": "\nUngraded(boyd)\nIrritative(boyd)\nUnworried(boyd)\nPupillary(boyd)\nUnstilted(boyd)\nUngraded(ladonna)\nPartial(ladonna)\nBetting(ladonna)\nIrritative(ladonna)\nUnworried(ladonna)\nPupillary(ladonna)\nUnstilted(ladonna)\nUngraded(zack)\nBetting(zack)\nPupillary(zack)\nforall x (Partial(x) and not Betting(x) -> not Unworried(x))\nforall x (Unstilted(x) -> Unworried(x))\nforall x (Ungraded(x) -> Unstilted(x))\n\nBetting(boyd)\n\nBetting(boyd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-744"} {"premises": "Randie is astringent. Randie is memorable. Randie is congolese. Randie is indocile. Randie is dimorphic. Randie is sagacious. Micheil is congolese. Micheil is sagacious. Raleigh is congolese. Raleigh is indocile. Raleigh is dimorphic. Raleigh is sagacious. If Raleigh is congolese and Raleigh is astringent then Raleigh is dimorphic. If someone is congolese and dimorphic then they are astringent. All sagacious people are dimorphic. Raleigh is dimorphic.", "logic": "\nAstringent(randie)\nMemorable(randie)\nCongolese(randie)\nIndocile(randie)\nDimorphic(randie)\nSagacious(randie)\nCongolese(micheil)\nSagacious(micheil)\nCongolese(raleigh)\nIndocile(raleigh)\nDimorphic(raleigh)\nSagacious(raleigh)\nCongolese(raleigh) and Astringent(raleigh) -> Dimorphic(raleigh)\nforall x (Congolese(x) and Dimorphic(x) -> Astringent(x))\nforall x (Sagacious(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\n\nDimorphic(raleigh)\n\ntherefore Dimorphic(raleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Reg is anabiotic. Reg is sectarian. Reg is sought. Reg is mundane. Reg is axiomatic. Reg is large. Carlos is sought. Carlos is large. Myke is sought. Myke is mundane. Myke is axiomatic. Myke is large. If Myke is sought and Myke is anabiotic then Myke is axiomatic. If someone is sought and axiomatic then they are anabiotic. All large people are axiomatic. Carlos is not sought.", "logic": "\nAnabiotic(reg)\nSectarian(reg)\nSought(reg)\nMundane(reg)\nAxiomatic(reg)\nLarge(reg)\nSought(carlos)\nLarge(carlos)\nSought(myke)\nMundane(myke)\nAxiomatic(myke)\nLarge(myke)\nSought(myke) and Anabiotic(myke) -> Axiomatic(myke)\nforall x (Sought(x) and Axiomatic(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Large(x) -> Axiomatic(x))\n\nnot Sought(carlos)\n\ntherefore Sought(carlos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Barbey is purposive. Barbey is libertine. Barbey is amebous. Barbey is meritless. Barbey is formic. Barbey is incised. Marney is amebous. Marney is incised. Evey is amebous. Evey is meritless. Evey is formic. Evey is incised. If Evey is amebous and Evey is purposive then Evey is formic. If someone is amebous and formic then they are purposive. All incised people are formic. Evey is purposive.", "logic": "\nPurposive(barbey)\nLibertine(barbey)\nAmebous(barbey)\nMeritless(barbey)\nFormic(barbey)\nIncised(barbey)\nAmebous(marney)\nIncised(marney)\nAmebous(evey)\nMeritless(evey)\nFormic(evey)\nIncised(evey)\nAmebous(evey) and Purposive(evey) -> Formic(evey)\nforall x (Amebous(x) and Formic(x) -> Purposive(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) -> Formic(x))\n\nPurposive(evey)\n\nAmebous(evey) and Formic(evey) and forall x (Amebous(x) and Formic(x) -> Purposive(x)) -> therefore Purposive(evey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Hagan is worried. Hagan is rushy. Hagan is iatrogenic. Hagan is bistred. Hagan is expandable. Hagan is permanent. Mahesh is iatrogenic. Mahesh is permanent. Annette is iatrogenic. Annette is bistred. Annette is expandable. Annette is permanent. If Annette is iatrogenic and Annette is worried then Annette is expandable. If someone is iatrogenic and expandable then they are worried. All permanent people are expandable. Mahesh is not expandable.", "logic": "\nWorried(hagan)\nRushy(hagan)\nIatrogenic(hagan)\nBistred(hagan)\nExpandable(hagan)\nPermanent(hagan)\nIatrogenic(mahesh)\nPermanent(mahesh)\nIatrogenic(annette)\nBistred(annette)\nExpandable(annette)\nPermanent(annette)\nIatrogenic(annette) and Worried(annette) -> Expandable(annette)\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) and Expandable(x) -> Worried(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Expandable(x))\n\nnot Expandable(mahesh)\n\nPermanent(mahesh) and forall x (Permanent(x) -> Expandable(x)) -> therefore Expandable(mahesh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Enrika is fledged. Enrika is obnoxious. Enrika is acerate. Enrika is burdensome. Enrika is conventual. Enrika is pharaonic. Vachel is acerate. Vachel is pharaonic. Wenonah is acerate. Wenonah is burdensome. Wenonah is conventual. Wenonah is pharaonic. If Wenonah is acerate and Wenonah is fledged then Wenonah is conventual. If someone is acerate and conventual then they are fledged. All pharaonic people are conventual. Vachel is fledged.", "logic": "\nFledged(enrika)\nObnoxious(enrika)\nAcerate(enrika)\nBurdensome(enrika)\nConventual(enrika)\nPharaonic(enrika)\nAcerate(vachel)\nPharaonic(vachel)\nAcerate(wenonah)\nBurdensome(wenonah)\nConventual(wenonah)\nPharaonic(wenonah)\nAcerate(wenonah) and Fledged(wenonah) -> Conventual(wenonah)\nforall x (Acerate(x) and Conventual(x) -> Fledged(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Conventual(x))\n\nFledged(vachel)\n\nPharaonic(vachel) and forall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Conventual(x)) -> therefore Conventual(vachel) Acerate(vachel) and Conventual(vachel) and forall x (Acerate(x) and Conventual(x) -> Fledged(x)) -> therefore Fledged(vachel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Aurelea is flameproof. Aurelea is pubic. Aurelea is disciform. Aurelea is milled. Aurelea is walloping. Aurelea is corrupt. Rupert is disciform. Rupert is corrupt. Stuart is disciform. Stuart is milled. Stuart is walloping. Stuart is corrupt. If Stuart is disciform and Stuart is flameproof then Stuart is walloping. If someone is disciform and walloping then they are flameproof. All corrupt people are walloping. Rupert is not flameproof.", "logic": "\nFlameproof(aurelea)\nPubic(aurelea)\nDisciform(aurelea)\nMilled(aurelea)\nWalloping(aurelea)\nCorrupt(aurelea)\nDisciform(rupert)\nCorrupt(rupert)\nDisciform(stuart)\nMilled(stuart)\nWalloping(stuart)\nCorrupt(stuart)\nDisciform(stuart) and Flameproof(stuart) -> Walloping(stuart)\nforall x (Disciform(x) and Walloping(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Corrupt(x) -> Walloping(x))\n\nnot Flameproof(rupert)\n\nCorrupt(rupert) and forall x (Corrupt(x) -> Walloping(x)) -> therefore Walloping(rupert) Disciform(rupert) and Walloping(rupert) and forall x (Disciform(x) and Walloping(x) -> Flameproof(x)) -> therefore Flameproof(rupert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Claude is tinny. Claude is smug. Claude is saving. Claude is crookback. Claude is dissident. Claude is blushful. Yale is saving. Yale is blushful. Lincoln is saving. Lincoln is crookback. Lincoln is dissident. Lincoln is blushful. If Lincoln is saving and Lincoln is tinny then Lincoln is dissident. If someone is saving and dissident then they are tinny. All blushful people are dissident. Lincoln is not blue.", "logic": "\nTinny(claude)\nSmug(claude)\nSaving(claude)\nCrookback(claude)\nDissident(claude)\nBlushful(claude)\nSaving(yale)\nBlushful(yale)\nSaving(lincoln)\nCrookback(lincoln)\nDissident(lincoln)\nBlushful(lincoln)\nSaving(lincoln) and Tinny(lincoln) -> Dissident(lincoln)\nforall x (Saving(x) and Dissident(x) -> Tinny(x))\nforall x (Blushful(x) -> Dissident(x))\n\nnot Blue(lincoln)\n\nnot Blue(lincoln) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Anjela is argentine. Anjela is unstudious. Anjela is trihydroxy. Anjela is unethical. Anjela is nineteen. Anjela is grapey. Fiann is trihydroxy. Fiann is grapey. Marcos is trihydroxy. Marcos is unethical. Marcos is nineteen. Marcos is grapey. If Marcos is trihydroxy and Marcos is argentine then Marcos is nineteen. If someone is trihydroxy and nineteen then they are argentine. All grapey people are nineteen. Anjela is blue.", "logic": "\nArgentine(anjela)\nUnstudious(anjela)\nTrihydroxy(anjela)\nUnethical(anjela)\nNineteen(anjela)\nGrapey(anjela)\nTrihydroxy(fiann)\nGrapey(fiann)\nTrihydroxy(marcos)\nUnethical(marcos)\nNineteen(marcos)\nGrapey(marcos)\nTrihydroxy(marcos) and Argentine(marcos) -> Nineteen(marcos)\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) and Nineteen(x) -> Argentine(x))\nforall x (Grapey(x) -> Nineteen(x))\n\nBlue(anjela)\n\nBlue(anjela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Alia is thirteen. Alia is coarse. Alia is solved. Alia is undersized. Alia is lightsome. Alia is cloze. Etty is solved. Etty is cloze. Joycelin is solved. Joycelin is undersized. Joycelin is lightsome. Joycelin is cloze. If Joycelin is solved and Joycelin is thirteen then Joycelin is lightsome. If someone is solved and lightsome then they are thirteen. All cloze people are lightsome. Etty is not coarse.", "logic": "\nThirteen(alia)\nCoarse(alia)\nSolved(alia)\nUndersized(alia)\nLightsome(alia)\nCloze(alia)\nSolved(etty)\nCloze(etty)\nSolved(joycelin)\nUndersized(joycelin)\nLightsome(joycelin)\nCloze(joycelin)\nSolved(joycelin) and Thirteen(joycelin) -> Lightsome(joycelin)\nforall x (Solved(x) and Lightsome(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Cloze(x) -> Lightsome(x))\n\nnot Coarse(etty)\n\nnot Coarse(etty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Ray is folksy. Ray is eurasiatic. Ray is salvadoran. Ray is pastelike. Ray is ramshackle. Ray is stationary. Yacov is salvadoran. Yacov is stationary. Delphina is salvadoran. Delphina is pastelike. Delphina is ramshackle. Delphina is stationary. If Delphina is salvadoran and Delphina is folksy then Delphina is ramshackle. If someone is salvadoran and ramshackle then they are folksy. All stationary people are ramshackle. Yacov is blue.", "logic": "\nFolksy(ray)\nEurasiatic(ray)\nSalvadoran(ray)\nPastelike(ray)\nRamshackle(ray)\nStationary(ray)\nSalvadoran(yacov)\nStationary(yacov)\nSalvadoran(delphina)\nPastelike(delphina)\nRamshackle(delphina)\nStationary(delphina)\nSalvadoran(delphina) and Folksy(delphina) -> Ramshackle(delphina)\nforall x (Salvadoran(x) and Ramshackle(x) -> Folksy(x))\nforall x (Stationary(x) -> Ramshackle(x))\n\nBlue(yacov)\n\nBlue(yacov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Ninon is optical. Ninon is carpellary. Ninon is analogous. Ninon is bicuspid. Ninon is treed. Ninon is divers. Demetre is analogous. Demetre is divers. Wallache is analogous. Wallache is bicuspid. Wallache is treed. Wallache is divers. If Wallache is analogous and Wallache is optical then Wallache is treed. If someone is analogous and treed then they are optical. All divers people are treed. Demetre is not bicuspid.", "logic": "\nOptical(ninon)\nCarpellary(ninon)\nAnalogous(ninon)\nBicuspid(ninon)\nTreed(ninon)\nDivers(ninon)\nAnalogous(demetre)\nDivers(demetre)\nAnalogous(wallache)\nBicuspid(wallache)\nTreed(wallache)\nDivers(wallache)\nAnalogous(wallache) and Optical(wallache) -> Treed(wallache)\nforall x (Analogous(x) and Treed(x) -> Optical(x))\nforall x (Divers(x) -> Treed(x))\n\nnot Bicuspid(demetre)\n\nnot Bicuspid(demetre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Ciara is mired. Ciara is maddened. Ciara is dishonest. Ciara is leftist. Ciara is intolerant. Ciara is oblique. Merv is dishonest. Merv is oblique. Rebecka is dishonest. Rebecka is leftist. Rebecka is intolerant. Rebecka is oblique. If Rebecka is dishonest and Rebecka is mired then Rebecka is intolerant. If someone is dishonest and intolerant then they are mired. All oblique people are intolerant. Rebecka is maddened.", "logic": "\nMired(ciara)\nMaddened(ciara)\nDishonest(ciara)\nLeftist(ciara)\nIntolerant(ciara)\nOblique(ciara)\nDishonest(merv)\nOblique(merv)\nDishonest(rebecka)\nLeftist(rebecka)\nIntolerant(rebecka)\nOblique(rebecka)\nDishonest(rebecka) and Mired(rebecka) -> Intolerant(rebecka)\nforall x (Dishonest(x) and Intolerant(x) -> Mired(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) -> Intolerant(x))\n\nMaddened(rebecka)\n\nMaddened(rebecka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Missy is extravert. Missy is sagacious. Andra is sagacious. All cuneal, sagacious people are unshielded. If someone is extravert and unshielded then they are cycloidal. Green, sagacious people are unshielded. Missy is extravert.", "logic": "\nExtravert(missy)\nSagacious(missy)\nSagacious(andra)\nforall x (Cuneal(x) and Sagacious(x) -> Unshielded(x))\nforall x (Extravert(x) and Unshielded(x) -> Cycloidal(x))\nforall x (Extravert(x) and Sagacious(x) -> Unshielded(x))\n\nExtravert(missy)\n\ntherefore Extravert(missy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Eden is paniculate. Eden is guiltless. Mugsy is guiltless. All leftover, guiltless people are best. If someone is paniculate and best then they are mucoid. Green, guiltless people are best. Eden is not guiltless.", "logic": "\nPaniculate(eden)\nGuiltless(eden)\nGuiltless(mugsy)\nforall x (Leftover(x) and Guiltless(x) -> Best(x))\nforall x (Paniculate(x) and Best(x) -> Mucoid(x))\nforall x (Paniculate(x) and Guiltless(x) -> Best(x))\n\nnot Guiltless(eden)\n\ntherefore Guiltless(eden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Doretta is loopy. Doretta is federate. Wenona is federate. All prompt, federate people are mansard. If someone is loopy and mansard then they are worthwhile. Green, federate people are mansard. Doretta is mansard.", "logic": "\nLoopy(doretta)\nFederate(doretta)\nFederate(wenona)\nforall x (Prompt(x) and Federate(x) -> Mansard(x))\nforall x (Loopy(x) and Mansard(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Loopy(x) and Federate(x) -> Mansard(x))\n\nMansard(doretta)\n\nLoopy(doretta) and Federate(doretta) and forall x (Loopy(x) and Federate(x) -> Mansard(x)) -> therefore Mansard(doretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Uriel is aweigh. Uriel is immense. Parry is immense. All verbalized, immense people are dimmed. If someone is aweigh and dimmed then they are pulverized. Green, immense people are dimmed. Uriel is not dimmed.", "logic": "\nAweigh(uriel)\nImmense(uriel)\nImmense(parry)\nforall x (Verbalized(x) and Immense(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) and Dimmed(x) -> Pulverized(x))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) and Immense(x) -> Dimmed(x))\n\nnot Dimmed(uriel)\n\nAweigh(uriel) and Immense(uriel) and forall x (Aweigh(x) and Immense(x) -> Dimmed(x)) -> therefore Dimmed(uriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Nilson is hind. Nilson is ruled. Bucky is ruled. All sarawakian, ruled people are homophonic. If someone is hind and homophonic then they are blanched. Green, ruled people are homophonic. Nilson is blanched.", "logic": "\nHind(nilson)\nRuled(nilson)\nRuled(bucky)\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and Ruled(x) -> Homophonic(x))\nforall x (Hind(x) and Homophonic(x) -> Blanched(x))\nforall x (Hind(x) and Ruled(x) -> Homophonic(x))\n\nBlanched(nilson)\n\nHind(nilson) and Ruled(nilson) and forall x (Hind(x) and Ruled(x) -> Homophonic(x)) -> therefore Homophonic(nilson) Hind(nilson) and Homophonic(nilson) and forall x (Hind(x) and Homophonic(x) -> Blanched(x)) -> therefore Blanched(nilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Leshia is illegible. Leshia is concluded. Rhianon is concluded. All taillike, concluded people are jerking. If someone is illegible and jerking then they are exilic. Green, concluded people are jerking. Leshia is not exilic.", "logic": "\nIllegible(leshia)\nConcluded(leshia)\nConcluded(rhianon)\nforall x (Taillike(x) and Concluded(x) -> Jerking(x))\nforall x (Illegible(x) and Jerking(x) -> Exilic(x))\nforall x (Illegible(x) and Concluded(x) -> Jerking(x))\n\nnot Exilic(leshia)\n\nIllegible(leshia) and Concluded(leshia) and forall x (Illegible(x) and Concluded(x) -> Jerking(x)) -> therefore Jerking(leshia) Illegible(leshia) and Jerking(leshia) and forall x (Illegible(x) and Jerking(x) -> Exilic(x)) -> therefore Exilic(leshia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Camila is septicemic. Camila is nonslip. Louie is nonslip. All braggy, nonslip people are hindmost. If someone is septicemic and hindmost then they are lxxx. Green, nonslip people are hindmost. Louie is not lxxx.", "logic": "\nSepticemic(camila)\nNonslip(camila)\nNonslip(louie)\nforall x (Braggy(x) and Nonslip(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) and Hindmost(x) -> Lxxx(x))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) and Nonslip(x) -> Hindmost(x))\n\nnot Lxxx(louie)\n\nforall x (Septicemic(x) and Hindmost(x) -> Lxxx(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Glennis is funny. Glennis is exotic. Bradford is exotic. All curt, exotic people are hesitating. If someone is funny and hesitating then they are rental. Green, exotic people are hesitating. Bradford is hesitating.", "logic": "\nFunny(glennis)\nExotic(glennis)\nExotic(bradford)\nforall x (Curt(x) and Exotic(x) -> Hesitating(x))\nforall x (Funny(x) and Hesitating(x) -> Rental(x))\nforall x (Funny(x) and Exotic(x) -> Hesitating(x))\n\nHesitating(bradford)\n\nforall x (Curt(x) and Exotic(x) -> Hesitating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Jacques is acrophobic. Jacques is lettered. Dana is lettered. All excited, lettered people are longtime. If someone is acrophobic and longtime then they are agonal. Green, lettered people are longtime. Dana is not excited.", "logic": "\nAcrophobic(jacques)\nLettered(jacques)\nLettered(dana)\nforall x (Excited(x) and Lettered(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) and Longtime(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) and Lettered(x) -> Longtime(x))\n\nnot Excited(dana)\n\nnot Excited(dana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Desaree is chopfallen. Desaree is contiguous. Hillery is contiguous. All nameless, contiguous people are eristic. If someone is chopfallen and eristic then they are ideal. Green, contiguous people are eristic. Hillery is nice.", "logic": "\nChopfallen(desaree)\nContiguous(desaree)\nContiguous(hillery)\nforall x (Nameless(x) and Contiguous(x) -> Eristic(x))\nforall x (Chopfallen(x) and Eristic(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Chopfallen(x) and Contiguous(x) -> Eristic(x))\n\nNice(hillery)\n\nNice(hillery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Meridith is summary. Meridith is testate. Judi is testate. All lethargic, testate people are electric. If someone is summary and electric then they are basilary. Green, testate people are electric. Meridith is not nice.", "logic": "\nSummary(meridith)\nTestate(meridith)\nTestate(judi)\nforall x (Lethargic(x) and Testate(x) -> Electric(x))\nforall x (Summary(x) and Electric(x) -> Basilary(x))\nforall x (Summary(x) and Testate(x) -> Electric(x))\n\nnot Nice(meridith)\n\nnot Nice(meridith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Elsy is spotless. Elsy is effluent. Kelsi is effluent. All content, effluent people are calycular. If someone is spotless and calycular then they are unfitting. Green, effluent people are calycular. Elsy is content.", "logic": "\nSpotless(elsy)\nEffluent(elsy)\nEffluent(kelsi)\nforall x (Content(x) and Effluent(x) -> Calycular(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Calycular(x) -> Unfitting(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Effluent(x) -> Calycular(x))\n\nContent(elsy)\n\nContent(elsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-312"} {"premises": "Anallese is hawkish. Davina is octagonal. Davina is bolivian. Davina is truthful. Melania is canonical. Melania is unlovable. Talia is struggling. If something is bolivian and struggling then it is octagonal. Rough, truthful things are canonical. If something is struggling then it is bolivian. Davina is bolivian.", "logic": "\nHawkish(anallese)\nOctagonal(davina)\nBolivian(davina)\nTruthful(davina)\nCanonical(melania)\nUnlovable(melania)\nStruggling(talia)\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Struggling(x) -> Octagonal(x))\nforall x (Unlovable(x) and Truthful(x) -> Canonical(x))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Bolivian(x))\n\nBolivian(davina)\n\ntherefore Bolivian(davina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Fabrice is peregrine. Cleveland is eruptive. Cleveland is unwell. Cleveland is precooked. Kalinda is chinless. Kalinda is bisontine. Glynis is bogartian. If something is unwell and bogartian then it is eruptive. Rough, precooked things are chinless. If something is bogartian then it is unwell. Fabrice is not peregrine.", "logic": "\nPeregrine(fabrice)\nEruptive(cleveland)\nUnwell(cleveland)\nPrecooked(cleveland)\nChinless(kalinda)\nBisontine(kalinda)\nBogartian(glynis)\nforall x (Unwell(x) and Bogartian(x) -> Eruptive(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) and Precooked(x) -> Chinless(x))\nforall x (Bogartian(x) -> Unwell(x))\n\nnot Peregrine(fabrice)\n\ntherefore Peregrine(fabrice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Tove is scarlet. Zonnya is criminal. Zonnya is chordal. Zonnya is drunk. Vally is landscaped. Vally is weekly. Neila is latinate. If something is chordal and latinate then it is criminal. Rough, drunk things are landscaped. If something is latinate then it is chordal. Neila is chordal.", "logic": "\nScarlet(tove)\nCriminal(zonnya)\nChordal(zonnya)\nDrunk(zonnya)\nLandscaped(vally)\nWeekly(vally)\nLatinate(neila)\nforall x (Chordal(x) and Latinate(x) -> Criminal(x))\nforall x (Weekly(x) and Drunk(x) -> Landscaped(x))\nforall x (Latinate(x) -> Chordal(x))\n\nChordal(neila)\n\nLatinate(neila) and forall x (Latinate(x) -> Chordal(x)) -> therefore Chordal(neila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Raoul is susurrant. Biddy is alert. Biddy is adaptative. Biddy is pureblood. Gillan is bewitched. Gillan is teenage. Gusta is artificial. If something is adaptative and artificial then it is alert. Rough, pureblood things are bewitched. If something is artificial then it is adaptative. Gusta is not adaptative.", "logic": "\nSusurrant(raoul)\nAlert(biddy)\nAdaptative(biddy)\nPureblood(biddy)\nBewitched(gillan)\nTeenage(gillan)\nArtificial(gusta)\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and Artificial(x) -> Alert(x))\nforall x (Teenage(x) and Pureblood(x) -> Bewitched(x))\nforall x (Artificial(x) -> Adaptative(x))\n\nnot Adaptative(gusta)\n\nArtificial(gusta) and forall x (Artificial(x) -> Adaptative(x)) -> therefore Adaptative(gusta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Ruthy is rude. Melba is everyday. Melba is decorated. Melba is frostian. Chancey is annoyed. Chancey is eleventh. Norris is ungentle. If something is decorated and ungentle then it is everyday. Rough, frostian things are annoyed. If something is ungentle then it is decorated. Norris is everyday.", "logic": "\nRude(ruthy)\nEveryday(melba)\nDecorated(melba)\nFrostian(melba)\nAnnoyed(chancey)\nEleventh(chancey)\nUngentle(norris)\nforall x (Decorated(x) and Ungentle(x) -> Everyday(x))\nforall x (Eleventh(x) and Frostian(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) -> Decorated(x))\n\nEveryday(norris)\n\nUngentle(norris) and forall x (Ungentle(x) -> Decorated(x)) -> therefore Decorated(norris) Decorated(norris) and Ungentle(norris) and forall x (Decorated(x) and Ungentle(x) -> Everyday(x)) -> therefore Everyday(norris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Orsa is deviate. Davis is blear. Davis is personable. Davis is throwaway. Nena is siberian. Nena is elder. Zonnya is dipterous. If something is personable and dipterous then it is blear. Rough, throwaway things are siberian. If something is dipterous then it is personable. Zonnya is not blear.", "logic": "\nDeviate(orsa)\nBlear(davis)\nPersonable(davis)\nThrowaway(davis)\nSiberian(nena)\nElder(nena)\nDipterous(zonnya)\nforall x (Personable(x) and Dipterous(x) -> Blear(x))\nforall x (Elder(x) and Throwaway(x) -> Siberian(x))\nforall x (Dipterous(x) -> Personable(x))\n\nnot Blear(zonnya)\n\nDipterous(zonnya) and forall x (Dipterous(x) -> Personable(x)) -> therefore Personable(zonnya) Personable(zonnya) and Dipterous(zonnya) and forall x (Personable(x) and Dipterous(x) -> Blear(x)) -> therefore Blear(zonnya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Sheela is continuous. Alvina is fruity. Alvina is songlike. Alvina is fruticose. Richardo is dextrorsal. Richardo is inundated. Sheril is colonised. If something is songlike and colonised then it is fruity. Rough, fruticose things are dextrorsal. If something is colonised then it is songlike. Sheela is not dextrorsal.", "logic": "\nContinuous(sheela)\nFruity(alvina)\nSonglike(alvina)\nFruticose(alvina)\nDextrorsal(richardo)\nInundated(richardo)\nColonised(sheril)\nforall x (Songlike(x) and Colonised(x) -> Fruity(x))\nforall x (Inundated(x) and Fruticose(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\nforall x (Colonised(x) -> Songlike(x))\n\nnot Dextrorsal(sheela)\n\nforall x (Inundated(x) and Fruticose(x) -> Dextrorsal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Alston is clubby. Beatriz is upcountry. Beatriz is select. Beatriz is feckless. Vail is liplike. Vail is unfinished. Malia is laotian. If something is select and laotian then it is upcountry. Rough, feckless things are liplike. If something is laotian then it is select. Beatriz is liplike.", "logic": "\nClubby(alston)\nUpcountry(beatriz)\nSelect(beatriz)\nFeckless(beatriz)\nLiplike(vail)\nUnfinished(vail)\nLaotian(malia)\nforall x (Select(x) and Laotian(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Unfinished(x) and Feckless(x) -> Liplike(x))\nforall x (Laotian(x) -> Select(x))\n\nLiplike(beatriz)\n\nforall x (Unfinished(x) and Feckless(x) -> Liplike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Humbert is telescopic. Duncan is agile. Duncan is observable. Duncan is plumbable. Lorita is perturbed. Lorita is songlike. Lacie is unpleasant. If something is observable and unpleasant then it is agile. Rough, plumbable things are perturbed. If something is unpleasant then it is observable. Lorita is not observable.", "logic": "\nTelescopic(humbert)\nAgile(duncan)\nObservable(duncan)\nPlumbable(duncan)\nPerturbed(lorita)\nSonglike(lorita)\nUnpleasant(lacie)\nforall x (Observable(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Agile(x))\nforall x (Songlike(x) and Plumbable(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Observable(x))\n\nnot Observable(lorita)\n\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Observable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Mallissa is extirpable. Dino is preclusive. Dino is anorthic. Dino is gone. Bethena is ellipsoid. Bethena is envious. Jarrett is strangled. If something is anorthic and strangled then it is preclusive. Rough, gone things are ellipsoid. If something is strangled then it is anorthic. Jarrett is envious.", "logic": "\nExtirpable(mallissa)\nPreclusive(dino)\nAnorthic(dino)\nGone(dino)\nEllipsoid(bethena)\nEnvious(bethena)\nStrangled(jarrett)\nforall x (Anorthic(x) and Strangled(x) -> Preclusive(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) and Gone(x) -> Ellipsoid(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> Anorthic(x))\n\nEnvious(jarrett)\n\nEnvious(jarrett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Celestina is amyloid. Harv is untrimmed. Harv is eupneic. Harv is casuistic. Celestia is bias. Celestia is unbeatable. Harvard is lowbrow. If something is eupneic and lowbrow then it is untrimmed. Rough, casuistic things are bias. If something is lowbrow then it is eupneic. Celestina is not casuistic.", "logic": "\nAmyloid(celestina)\nUntrimmed(harv)\nEupneic(harv)\nCasuistic(harv)\nBias(celestia)\nUnbeatable(celestia)\nLowbrow(harvard)\nforall x (Eupneic(x) and Lowbrow(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) and Casuistic(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Eupneic(x))\n\nnot Casuistic(celestina)\n\nnot Casuistic(celestina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "Liuka is offside. Bernd is torrid. Bernd is ungeared. Bernd is acyclic. Nertie is legato. Nertie is detached. Giffer is branchial. If something is ungeared and branchial then it is torrid. Rough, acyclic things are legato. If something is branchial then it is ungeared. Bernd is offside.", "logic": "\nOffside(liuka)\nTorrid(bernd)\nUngeared(bernd)\nAcyclic(bernd)\nLegato(nertie)\nDetached(nertie)\nBranchial(giffer)\nforall x (Ungeared(x) and Branchial(x) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Detached(x) and Acyclic(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) -> Ungeared(x))\n\nOffside(bernd)\n\nOffside(bernd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1113"} {"premises": "The letisha resift the arlyne. The letisha is curved. The letisha is sacked. The letisha maintain the danyette. The letisha maintain the arlyne. The letisha bedevil the danyette. The letisha bedevil the arlyne. The danyette resift the letisha. The danyette is venomous. The danyette bedevil the letisha. The arlyne resift the danyette. The arlyne is barbellate. The arlyne is venomous. The arlyne maintain the letisha. The arlyne bedevil the letisha. The arlyne bedevil the danyette. If someone is barbellate and curved then they need the danyette. If someone bedevil the arlyne then the arlyne is curved. The danyette resift the letisha.", "logic": "\nResift(letisha, arlyne)\nCurved(letisha)\nSacked(letisha)\nMaintain(letisha, danyette)\nMaintain(letisha, arlyne)\nBedevil(letisha, danyette)\nBedevil(letisha, arlyne)\nResift(danyette, letisha)\nVenomous(danyette)\nBedevil(danyette, letisha)\nResift(arlyne, danyette)\nBarbellate(arlyne)\nVenomous(arlyne)\nMaintain(arlyne, letisha)\nBedevil(arlyne, letisha)\nBedevil(arlyne, danyette)\nforall x (Barbellate(x) and Curved(x) -> Maintain(x, danyette))\nforall x (Bedevil(x, arlyne) -> Curved(arlyne))\n\nResift(danyette, letisha)\n\ntherefore Resift(danyette, letisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The bud perpetuate the romona. The bud is overaged. The bud is optional. The bud rehash the ami. The bud rehash the romona. The bud overrate the ami. The bud overrate the romona. The ami perpetuate the bud. The ami is varying. The ami overrate the bud. The romona perpetuate the ami. The romona is fistulous. The romona is varying. The romona rehash the bud. The romona overrate the bud. The romona overrate the ami. If someone is fistulous and overaged then they need the ami. If someone overrate the romona then the romona is overaged. The romona does not visit the ami.", "logic": "\nPerpetuate(bud, romona)\nOveraged(bud)\nOptional(bud)\nRehash(bud, ami)\nRehash(bud, romona)\nOverrate(bud, ami)\nOverrate(bud, romona)\nPerpetuate(ami, bud)\nVarying(ami)\nOverrate(ami, bud)\nPerpetuate(romona, ami)\nFistulous(romona)\nVarying(romona)\nRehash(romona, bud)\nOverrate(romona, bud)\nOverrate(romona, ami)\nforall x (Fistulous(x) and Overaged(x) -> Rehash(x, ami))\nforall x (Overrate(x, romona) -> Overaged(romona))\n\nnot Overrate(romona, ami)\n\ntherefore Overrate(romona, ami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The cecilla crap the broderic. The cecilla is treeless. The cecilla is beatified. The cecilla mangle the eleanore. The cecilla mangle the broderic. The cecilla depone the eleanore. The cecilla depone the broderic. The eleanore crap the cecilla. The eleanore is drizzly. The eleanore depone the cecilla. The broderic crap the eleanore. The broderic is sold. The broderic is drizzly. The broderic mangle the cecilla. The broderic depone the cecilla. The broderic depone the eleanore. If someone is sold and treeless then they need the eleanore. If someone depone the broderic then the broderic is treeless. The broderic is treeless.", "logic": "\nCrap(cecilla, broderic)\nTreeless(cecilla)\nBeatified(cecilla)\nMangle(cecilla, eleanore)\nMangle(cecilla, broderic)\nDepone(cecilla, eleanore)\nDepone(cecilla, broderic)\nCrap(eleanore, cecilla)\nDrizzly(eleanore)\nDepone(eleanore, cecilla)\nCrap(broderic, eleanore)\nSold(broderic)\nDrizzly(broderic)\nMangle(broderic, cecilla)\nDepone(broderic, cecilla)\nDepone(broderic, eleanore)\nforall x (Sold(x) and Treeless(x) -> Mangle(x, eleanore))\nforall x (Depone(x, broderic) -> Treeless(broderic))\n\nTreeless(broderic)\n\nDepone(cecilla, broderic) and forall x (Depone(x, broderic) -> Treeless(broderic)) -> therefore Treeless(broderic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The janelle curve the mickie. The janelle is semirigid. The janelle is wilful. The janelle systemise the humbert. The janelle systemise the mickie. The janelle verdigris the humbert. The janelle verdigris the mickie. The humbert curve the janelle. The humbert is suckled. The humbert verdigris the janelle. The mickie curve the humbert. The mickie is boughless. The mickie is suckled. The mickie systemise the janelle. The mickie verdigris the janelle. The mickie verdigris the humbert. If someone is boughless and semirigid then they need the humbert. If someone verdigris the mickie then the mickie is semirigid. The mickie is not semirigid.", "logic": "\nCurve(janelle, mickie)\nSemirigid(janelle)\nWilful(janelle)\nSystemise(janelle, humbert)\nSystemise(janelle, mickie)\nVerdigris(janelle, humbert)\nVerdigris(janelle, mickie)\nCurve(humbert, janelle)\nSuckled(humbert)\nVerdigris(humbert, janelle)\nCurve(mickie, humbert)\nBoughless(mickie)\nSuckled(mickie)\nSystemise(mickie, janelle)\nVerdigris(mickie, janelle)\nVerdigris(mickie, humbert)\nforall x (Boughless(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Systemise(x, humbert))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, mickie) -> Semirigid(mickie))\n\nnot Semirigid(mickie)\n\nVerdigris(janelle, mickie) and forall x (Verdigris(x, mickie) -> Semirigid(mickie)) -> therefore Semirigid(mickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The mechelle pillage the kerri. The mechelle is peremptory. The mechelle is untenable. The mechelle twirp the tessie. The mechelle twirp the kerri. The mechelle admire the tessie. The mechelle admire the kerri. The tessie pillage the mechelle. The tessie is childish. The tessie admire the mechelle. The kerri pillage the tessie. The kerri is membered. The kerri is childish. The kerri twirp the mechelle. The kerri admire the mechelle. The kerri admire the tessie. If someone is membered and peremptory then they need the tessie. If someone admire the kerri then the kerri is peremptory. The kerri twirp the tessie.", "logic": "\nPillage(mechelle, kerri)\nPeremptory(mechelle)\nUntenable(mechelle)\nTwirp(mechelle, tessie)\nTwirp(mechelle, kerri)\nAdmire(mechelle, tessie)\nAdmire(mechelle, kerri)\nPillage(tessie, mechelle)\nChildish(tessie)\nAdmire(tessie, mechelle)\nPillage(kerri, tessie)\nMembered(kerri)\nChildish(kerri)\nTwirp(kerri, mechelle)\nAdmire(kerri, mechelle)\nAdmire(kerri, tessie)\nforall x (Membered(x) and Peremptory(x) -> Twirp(x, tessie))\nforall x (Admire(x, kerri) -> Peremptory(kerri))\n\nTwirp(kerri, tessie)\n\nAdmire(mechelle, kerri) and forall x (Admire(x, kerri) -> Peremptory(kerri)) -> therefore Peremptory(kerri) Membered(kerri) and Peremptory(kerri) and forall x (Membered(x) and Peremptory(x) -> Twirp(x, tessie)) -> therefore Twirp(kerri, tessie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The see astrogate the xylina. The see is fidgety. The see is given. The see malnourish the paten. The see malnourish the xylina. The see impound the paten. The see impound the xylina. The paten astrogate the see. The paten is burundi. The paten impound the see. The xylina astrogate the paten. The xylina is outrigged. The xylina is burundi. The xylina malnourish the see. The xylina impound the see. The xylina impound the paten. If someone is outrigged and fidgety then they need the paten. If someone impound the xylina then the xylina is fidgety. The xylina does not need the paten.", "logic": "\nAstrogate(see, xylina)\nFidgety(see)\nGiven(see)\nMalnourish(see, paten)\nMalnourish(see, xylina)\nImpound(see, paten)\nImpound(see, xylina)\nAstrogate(paten, see)\nBurundi(paten)\nImpound(paten, see)\nAstrogate(xylina, paten)\nOutrigged(xylina)\nBurundi(xylina)\nMalnourish(xylina, see)\nImpound(xylina, see)\nImpound(xylina, paten)\nforall x (Outrigged(x) and Fidgety(x) -> Malnourish(x, paten))\nforall x (Impound(x, xylina) -> Fidgety(xylina))\n\nnot Malnourish(xylina, paten)\n\nImpound(see, xylina) and forall x (Impound(x, xylina) -> Fidgety(xylina)) -> therefore Fidgety(xylina) Outrigged(xylina) and Fidgety(xylina) and forall x (Outrigged(x) and Fidgety(x) -> Malnourish(x, paten)) -> therefore Malnourish(xylina, paten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The garrot bottlefeed the eleonore. The garrot is curdled. The garrot is apteral. The garrot undersell the timmie. The garrot undersell the eleonore. The garrot sterilize the timmie. The garrot sterilize the eleonore. The timmie bottlefeed the garrot. The timmie is torrid. The timmie sterilize the garrot. The eleonore bottlefeed the timmie. The eleonore is ectodermal. The eleonore is torrid. The eleonore undersell the garrot. The eleonore sterilize the garrot. The eleonore sterilize the timmie. If someone is ectodermal and curdled then they need the timmie. If someone sterilize the eleonore then the eleonore is curdled. The timmie does not need the timmie.", "logic": "\nBottlefeed(garrot, eleonore)\nCurdled(garrot)\nApteral(garrot)\nUndersell(garrot, timmie)\nUndersell(garrot, eleonore)\nSterilize(garrot, timmie)\nSterilize(garrot, eleonore)\nBottlefeed(timmie, garrot)\nTorrid(timmie)\nSterilize(timmie, garrot)\nBottlefeed(eleonore, timmie)\nEctodermal(eleonore)\nTorrid(eleonore)\nUndersell(eleonore, garrot)\nSterilize(eleonore, garrot)\nSterilize(eleonore, timmie)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Curdled(x) -> Undersell(x, timmie))\nforall x (Sterilize(x, eleonore) -> Curdled(eleonore))\n\nnot Undersell(timmie, timmie)\n\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Curdled(x) -> Undersell(x, timmie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The norean transduce the virgie. The norean is hebraic. The norean is conventual. The norean fluoresce the chandal. The norean fluoresce the virgie. The norean cannulise the chandal. The norean cannulise the virgie. The chandal transduce the norean. The chandal is impervious. The chandal cannulise the norean. The virgie transduce the chandal. The virgie is waxed. The virgie is impervious. The virgie fluoresce the norean. The virgie cannulise the norean. The virgie cannulise the chandal. If someone is waxed and hebraic then they need the chandal. If someone cannulise the virgie then the virgie is hebraic. The chandal is young.", "logic": "\nTransduce(norean, virgie)\nHebraic(norean)\nConventual(norean)\nFluoresce(norean, chandal)\nFluoresce(norean, virgie)\nCannulise(norean, chandal)\nCannulise(norean, virgie)\nTransduce(chandal, norean)\nImpervious(chandal)\nCannulise(chandal, norean)\nTransduce(virgie, chandal)\nWaxed(virgie)\nImpervious(virgie)\nFluoresce(virgie, norean)\nCannulise(virgie, norean)\nCannulise(virgie, chandal)\nforall x (Waxed(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Fluoresce(x, chandal))\nforall x (Cannulise(x, virgie) -> Hebraic(virgie))\n\nYoung(chandal)\n\nYoung(chandal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The dorothea emblazon the saraann. The dorothea is unshaded. The dorothea is peristylar. The dorothea kneel the sybil. The dorothea kneel the saraann. The dorothea unsaddle the sybil. The dorothea unsaddle the saraann. The sybil emblazon the dorothea. The sybil is wholemeal. The sybil unsaddle the dorothea. The saraann emblazon the sybil. The saraann is gentile. The saraann is wholemeal. The saraann kneel the dorothea. The saraann unsaddle the dorothea. The saraann unsaddle the sybil. If someone is gentile and unshaded then they need the sybil. If someone unsaddle the saraann then the saraann is unshaded. The dorothea is not gentile.", "logic": "\nEmblazon(dorothea, saraann)\nUnshaded(dorothea)\nPeristylar(dorothea)\nKneel(dorothea, sybil)\nKneel(dorothea, saraann)\nUnsaddle(dorothea, sybil)\nUnsaddle(dorothea, saraann)\nEmblazon(sybil, dorothea)\nWholemeal(sybil)\nUnsaddle(sybil, dorothea)\nEmblazon(saraann, sybil)\nGentile(saraann)\nWholemeal(saraann)\nKneel(saraann, dorothea)\nUnsaddle(saraann, dorothea)\nUnsaddle(saraann, sybil)\nforall x (Gentile(x) and Unshaded(x) -> Kneel(x, sybil))\nforall x (Unsaddle(x, saraann) -> Unshaded(saraann))\n\nnot Gentile(dorothea)\n\nnot Gentile(dorothea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The sussi wallow the mersey. The sussi is anicteric. The sussi is undamaged. The sussi rhyme the mada. The sussi rhyme the mersey. The sussi wade the mada. The sussi wade the mersey. The mada wallow the sussi. The mada is pragmatic. The mada wade the sussi. The mersey wallow the mada. The mersey is feculent. The mersey is pragmatic. The mersey rhyme the sussi. The mersey wade the sussi. The mersey wade the mada. If someone is feculent and anicteric then they need the mada. If someone wade the mersey then the mersey is anicteric. The mada is anicteric.", "logic": "\nWallow(sussi, mersey)\nAnicteric(sussi)\nUndamaged(sussi)\nRhyme(sussi, mada)\nRhyme(sussi, mersey)\nWade(sussi, mada)\nWade(sussi, mersey)\nWallow(mada, sussi)\nPragmatic(mada)\nWade(mada, sussi)\nWallow(mersey, mada)\nFeculent(mersey)\nPragmatic(mersey)\nRhyme(mersey, sussi)\nWade(mersey, sussi)\nWade(mersey, mada)\nforall x (Feculent(x) and Anicteric(x) -> Rhyme(x, mada))\nforall x (Wade(x, mersey) -> Anicteric(mersey))\n\nAnicteric(mada)\n\nAnicteric(mada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The amandy supply the munmro. The amandy is paraguayan. The amandy is hierarchal. The amandy intermix the solomon. The amandy intermix the munmro. The amandy trifurcate the solomon. The amandy trifurcate the munmro. The solomon supply the amandy. The solomon is cilial. The solomon trifurcate the amandy. The munmro supply the solomon. The munmro is vivace. The munmro is cilial. The munmro intermix the amandy. The munmro trifurcate the amandy. The munmro trifurcate the solomon. If someone is vivace and paraguayan then they need the solomon. If someone trifurcate the munmro then the munmro is paraguayan. The solomon does not visit the munmro.", "logic": "\nSupply(amandy, munmro)\nParaguayan(amandy)\nHierarchal(amandy)\nIntermix(amandy, solomon)\nIntermix(amandy, munmro)\nTrifurcate(amandy, solomon)\nTrifurcate(amandy, munmro)\nSupply(solomon, amandy)\nCilial(solomon)\nTrifurcate(solomon, amandy)\nSupply(munmro, solomon)\nVivace(munmro)\nCilial(munmro)\nIntermix(munmro, amandy)\nTrifurcate(munmro, amandy)\nTrifurcate(munmro, solomon)\nforall x (Vivace(x) and Paraguayan(x) -> Intermix(x, solomon))\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, munmro) -> Paraguayan(munmro))\n\nnot Trifurcate(solomon, munmro)\n\nnot Trifurcate(solomon, munmro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "The derby charter the noella. The derby is deific. The derby is mint. The derby cord the michael. The derby cord the noella. The derby revitalise the michael. The derby revitalise the noella. The michael charter the derby. The michael is flexile. The michael revitalise the derby. The noella charter the michael. The noella is germfree. The noella is flexile. The noella cord the derby. The noella revitalise the derby. The noella revitalise the michael. If someone is germfree and deific then they need the michael. If someone revitalise the noella then the noella is deific. The michael cord the noella.", "logic": "\nCharter(derby, noella)\nDeific(derby)\nMint(derby)\nCord(derby, michael)\nCord(derby, noella)\nRevitalise(derby, michael)\nRevitalise(derby, noella)\nCharter(michael, derby)\nFlexile(michael)\nRevitalise(michael, derby)\nCharter(noella, michael)\nGermfree(noella)\nFlexile(noella)\nCord(noella, derby)\nRevitalise(noella, derby)\nRevitalise(noella, michael)\nforall x (Germfree(x) and Deific(x) -> Cord(x, michael))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, noella) -> Deific(noella))\n\nCord(michael, noella)\n\nCord(michael, noella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-597"} {"premises": "Frank is chlamydial. Frank is unheralded. Frank is unashamed. Frank is not ternary. Frank is norman. Munmro is wearying. Munmro is not unheralded. Munmro is not ternary. Munmro is norman. Hollie is pernicious. Hendrika is wearying. Hendrika is unashamed. If Hollie is unheralded then Hollie is not wearying. Smart things are pernicious. If Hendrika is unheralded and Hendrika is not ternary then Hendrika is unashamed. If Hollie is pernicious then Hollie is unheralded. All unashamed, ternary things are norman. If Munmro is not pernicious then Munmro is wearying. Hollie is pernicious.", "logic": "\nChlamydial(frank)\nUnheralded(frank)\nUnashamed(frank)\nnot Ternary(frank)\nNorman(frank)\nWearying(munmro)\nnot Unheralded(munmro)\nnot Ternary(munmro)\nNorman(munmro)\nPernicious(hollie)\nWearying(hendrika)\nUnashamed(hendrika)\nUnheralded(hollie) -> not Wearying(hollie)\nforall x (Ternary(x) -> Pernicious(x))\nUnheralded(hendrika) and not Ternary(hendrika) -> Unashamed(hendrika)\nPernicious(hollie) -> Unheralded(hollie)\nforall x (Unashamed(x) and Ternary(x) -> Norman(x))\nnot Pernicious(munmro) -> Wearying(munmro)\n\nPernicious(hollie)\n\ntherefore Pernicious(hollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Rahal is untimbered. Rahal is incurable. Rahal is thalloid. Rahal is not bosky. Rahal is outlandish. Frazier is newfound. Frazier is not incurable. Frazier is not bosky. Frazier is outlandish. Laila is timed. Garey is newfound. Garey is thalloid. If Laila is incurable then Laila is not newfound. Smart things are timed. If Garey is incurable and Garey is not bosky then Garey is thalloid. If Laila is timed then Laila is incurable. All thalloid, bosky things are outlandish. If Frazier is not timed then Frazier is newfound. Garey is not newfound.", "logic": "\nUntimbered(rahal)\nIncurable(rahal)\nThalloid(rahal)\nnot Bosky(rahal)\nOutlandish(rahal)\nNewfound(frazier)\nnot Incurable(frazier)\nnot Bosky(frazier)\nOutlandish(frazier)\nTimed(laila)\nNewfound(garey)\nThalloid(garey)\nIncurable(laila) -> not Newfound(laila)\nforall x (Bosky(x) -> Timed(x))\nIncurable(garey) and not Bosky(garey) -> Thalloid(garey)\nTimed(laila) -> Incurable(laila)\nforall x (Thalloid(x) and Bosky(x) -> Outlandish(x))\nnot Timed(frazier) -> Newfound(frazier)\n\nnot Newfound(garey)\n\ntherefore Newfound(garey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Raoul is berrylike. Raoul is dividable. Raoul is quartan. Raoul is not horrible. Raoul is boylike. Charisse is prakritic. Charisse is not dividable. Charisse is not horrible. Charisse is boylike. Annadiana is faustian. Stafford is prakritic. Stafford is quartan. If Annadiana is dividable then Annadiana is not prakritic. Smart things are faustian. If Stafford is dividable and Stafford is not horrible then Stafford is quartan. If Annadiana is faustian then Annadiana is dividable. All quartan, horrible things are boylike. If Charisse is not faustian then Charisse is prakritic. Annadiana is dividable.", "logic": "\nBerrylike(raoul)\nDividable(raoul)\nQuartan(raoul)\nnot Horrible(raoul)\nBoylike(raoul)\nPrakritic(charisse)\nnot Dividable(charisse)\nnot Horrible(charisse)\nBoylike(charisse)\nFaustian(annadiana)\nPrakritic(stafford)\nQuartan(stafford)\nDividable(annadiana) -> not Prakritic(annadiana)\nforall x (Horrible(x) -> Faustian(x))\nDividable(stafford) and not Horrible(stafford) -> Quartan(stafford)\nFaustian(annadiana) -> Dividable(annadiana)\nforall x (Quartan(x) and Horrible(x) -> Boylike(x))\nnot Faustian(charisse) -> Prakritic(charisse)\n\nDividable(annadiana)\n\nFaustian(annadiana) and Faustian(annadiana) -> Dividable(annadiana) -> therefore Dividable(annadiana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Traci is unframed. Traci is puberulent. Traci is algophobic. Traci is not undirected. Traci is puckish. Aeriel is inculpable. Aeriel is not puberulent. Aeriel is not undirected. Aeriel is puckish. Cleland is macedonian. Suzanna is inculpable. Suzanna is algophobic. If Cleland is puberulent then Cleland is not inculpable. Smart things are macedonian. If Suzanna is puberulent and Suzanna is not undirected then Suzanna is algophobic. If Cleland is macedonian then Cleland is puberulent. All algophobic, undirected things are puckish. If Aeriel is not macedonian then Aeriel is inculpable. Cleland is not puberulent.", "logic": "\nUnframed(traci)\nPuberulent(traci)\nAlgophobic(traci)\nnot Undirected(traci)\nPuckish(traci)\nInculpable(aeriel)\nnot Puberulent(aeriel)\nnot Undirected(aeriel)\nPuckish(aeriel)\nMacedonian(cleland)\nInculpable(suzanna)\nAlgophobic(suzanna)\nPuberulent(cleland) -> not Inculpable(cleland)\nforall x (Undirected(x) -> Macedonian(x))\nPuberulent(suzanna) and not Undirected(suzanna) -> Algophobic(suzanna)\nMacedonian(cleland) -> Puberulent(cleland)\nforall x (Algophobic(x) and Undirected(x) -> Puckish(x))\nnot Macedonian(aeriel) -> Inculpable(aeriel)\n\nnot Puberulent(cleland)\n\nMacedonian(cleland) and Macedonian(cleland) -> Puberulent(cleland) -> therefore Puberulent(cleland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Carlo is combed. Carlo is aroused. Carlo is preferent. Carlo is not trackless. Carlo is lubricated. Leopold is saute. Leopold is not aroused. Leopold is not trackless. Leopold is lubricated. Jerrylee is bullying. Roddy is saute. Roddy is preferent. If Jerrylee is aroused then Jerrylee is not saute. Smart things are bullying. If Roddy is aroused and Roddy is not trackless then Roddy is preferent. If Jerrylee is bullying then Jerrylee is aroused. All preferent, trackless things are lubricated. If Leopold is not bullying then Leopold is saute. Jerrylee is not saute.", "logic": "\nCombed(carlo)\nAroused(carlo)\nPreferent(carlo)\nnot Trackless(carlo)\nLubricated(carlo)\nSaute(leopold)\nnot Aroused(leopold)\nnot Trackless(leopold)\nLubricated(leopold)\nBullying(jerrylee)\nSaute(roddy)\nPreferent(roddy)\nAroused(jerrylee) -> not Saute(jerrylee)\nforall x (Trackless(x) -> Bullying(x))\nAroused(roddy) and not Trackless(roddy) -> Preferent(roddy)\nBullying(jerrylee) -> Aroused(jerrylee)\nforall x (Preferent(x) and Trackless(x) -> Lubricated(x))\nnot Bullying(leopold) -> Saute(leopold)\n\nnot Saute(jerrylee)\n\nBullying(jerrylee) and Bullying(jerrylee) -> Aroused(jerrylee) -> therefore Aroused(jerrylee) Aroused(jerrylee) and Aroused(jerrylee) -> not Saute(jerrylee) -> therefore not Saute(jerrylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Marjorie is caesarean. Marjorie is spicy. Marjorie is surviving. Marjorie is not divorced. Marjorie is brinded. Reed is unwary. Reed is not spicy. Reed is not divorced. Reed is brinded. Chrissa is unsalted. Nariko is unwary. Nariko is surviving. If Chrissa is spicy then Chrissa is not unwary. Smart things are unsalted. If Nariko is spicy and Nariko is not divorced then Nariko is surviving. If Chrissa is unsalted then Chrissa is spicy. All surviving, divorced things are brinded. If Reed is not unsalted then Reed is unwary. Chrissa is unwary.", "logic": "\nCaesarean(marjorie)\nSpicy(marjorie)\nSurviving(marjorie)\nnot Divorced(marjorie)\nBrinded(marjorie)\nUnwary(reed)\nnot Spicy(reed)\nnot Divorced(reed)\nBrinded(reed)\nUnsalted(chrissa)\nUnwary(nariko)\nSurviving(nariko)\nSpicy(chrissa) -> not Unwary(chrissa)\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Unsalted(x))\nSpicy(nariko) and not Divorced(nariko) -> Surviving(nariko)\nUnsalted(chrissa) -> Spicy(chrissa)\nforall x (Surviving(x) and Divorced(x) -> Brinded(x))\nnot Unsalted(reed) -> Unwary(reed)\n\nUnwary(chrissa)\n\nUnsalted(chrissa) and Unsalted(chrissa) -> Spicy(chrissa) -> therefore Spicy(chrissa) Spicy(chrissa) and Spicy(chrissa) -> not Unwary(chrissa) -> therefore not Unwary(chrissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Andra is nether. Andra is unhealed. Andra is sectarian. Andra is not anatomical. Andra is vinaceous. Martainn is capital. Martainn is not unhealed. Martainn is not anatomical. Martainn is vinaceous. Jordanna is supervised. Jacquelyn is capital. Jacquelyn is sectarian. If Jordanna is unhealed then Jordanna is not capital. Smart things are supervised. If Jacquelyn is unhealed and Jacquelyn is not anatomical then Jacquelyn is sectarian. If Jordanna is supervised then Jordanna is unhealed. All sectarian, anatomical things are vinaceous. If Martainn is not supervised then Martainn is capital. Martainn is not supervised.", "logic": "\nNether(andra)\nUnhealed(andra)\nSectarian(andra)\nnot Anatomical(andra)\nVinaceous(andra)\nCapital(martainn)\nnot Unhealed(martainn)\nnot Anatomical(martainn)\nVinaceous(martainn)\nSupervised(jordanna)\nCapital(jacquelyn)\nSectarian(jacquelyn)\nUnhealed(jordanna) -> not Capital(jordanna)\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Supervised(x))\nUnhealed(jacquelyn) and not Anatomical(jacquelyn) -> Sectarian(jacquelyn)\nSupervised(jordanna) -> Unhealed(jordanna)\nforall x (Sectarian(x) and Anatomical(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\nnot Supervised(martainn) -> Capital(martainn)\n\nnot Supervised(martainn)\n\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Supervised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Jennee is verbalised. Jennee is malicious. Jennee is ecuadorian. Jennee is not hoydenish. Jennee is glum. Rebecca is pledged. Rebecca is not malicious. Rebecca is not hoydenish. Rebecca is glum. Fernande is unattired. Consuela is pledged. Consuela is ecuadorian. If Fernande is malicious then Fernande is not pledged. Smart things are unattired. If Consuela is malicious and Consuela is not hoydenish then Consuela is ecuadorian. If Fernande is unattired then Fernande is malicious. All ecuadorian, hoydenish things are glum. If Rebecca is not unattired then Rebecca is pledged. Fernande is glum.", "logic": "\nVerbalised(jennee)\nMalicious(jennee)\nEcuadorian(jennee)\nnot Hoydenish(jennee)\nGlum(jennee)\nPledged(rebecca)\nnot Malicious(rebecca)\nnot Hoydenish(rebecca)\nGlum(rebecca)\nUnattired(fernande)\nPledged(consuela)\nEcuadorian(consuela)\nMalicious(fernande) -> not Pledged(fernande)\nforall x (Hoydenish(x) -> Unattired(x))\nMalicious(consuela) and not Hoydenish(consuela) -> Ecuadorian(consuela)\nUnattired(fernande) -> Malicious(fernande)\nforall x (Ecuadorian(x) and Hoydenish(x) -> Glum(x))\nnot Unattired(rebecca) -> Pledged(rebecca)\n\nGlum(fernande)\n\nforall x (Ecuadorian(x) and Hoydenish(x) -> Glum(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Melba is monoclinal. Melba is lashing. Melba is caddish. Melba is not oval. Melba is unlabelled. Filmore is halting. Filmore is not lashing. Filmore is not oval. Filmore is unlabelled. Raychel is gimcrack. Eulalie is halting. Eulalie is caddish. If Raychel is lashing then Raychel is not halting. Smart things are gimcrack. If Eulalie is lashing and Eulalie is not oval then Eulalie is caddish. If Raychel is gimcrack then Raychel is lashing. All caddish, oval things are unlabelled. If Filmore is not gimcrack then Filmore is halting. Melba is not gimcrack.", "logic": "\nMonoclinal(melba)\nLashing(melba)\nCaddish(melba)\nnot Oval(melba)\nUnlabelled(melba)\nHalting(filmore)\nnot Lashing(filmore)\nnot Oval(filmore)\nUnlabelled(filmore)\nGimcrack(raychel)\nHalting(eulalie)\nCaddish(eulalie)\nLashing(raychel) -> not Halting(raychel)\nforall x (Oval(x) -> Gimcrack(x))\nLashing(eulalie) and not Oval(eulalie) -> Caddish(eulalie)\nGimcrack(raychel) -> Lashing(raychel)\nforall x (Caddish(x) and Oval(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nnot Gimcrack(filmore) -> Halting(filmore)\n\nnot Gimcrack(melba)\n\nforall x (Oval(x) -> Gimcrack(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Ardelle is bedless. Ardelle is eparchial. Ardelle is personable. Ardelle is not monopteral. Ardelle is besotted. Anselm is bigheaded. Anselm is not eparchial. Anselm is not monopteral. Anselm is besotted. Radcliffe is frontmost. Hermann is bigheaded. Hermann is personable. If Radcliffe is eparchial then Radcliffe is not bigheaded. Smart things are frontmost. If Hermann is eparchial and Hermann is not monopteral then Hermann is personable. If Radcliffe is frontmost then Radcliffe is eparchial. All personable, monopteral things are besotted. If Anselm is not frontmost then Anselm is bigheaded. Radcliffe is monopteral.", "logic": "\nBedless(ardelle)\nEparchial(ardelle)\nPersonable(ardelle)\nnot Monopteral(ardelle)\nBesotted(ardelle)\nBigheaded(anselm)\nnot Eparchial(anselm)\nnot Monopteral(anselm)\nBesotted(anselm)\nFrontmost(radcliffe)\nBigheaded(hermann)\nPersonable(hermann)\nEparchial(radcliffe) -> not Bigheaded(radcliffe)\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nEparchial(hermann) and not Monopteral(hermann) -> Personable(hermann)\nFrontmost(radcliffe) -> Eparchial(radcliffe)\nforall x (Personable(x) and Monopteral(x) -> Besotted(x))\nnot Frontmost(anselm) -> Bigheaded(anselm)\n\nMonopteral(radcliffe)\n\nMonopteral(radcliffe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Nananne is deckled. Nananne is exiguous. Nananne is divided. Nananne is not irritated. Nananne is unreserved. Berkie is waspish. Berkie is not exiguous. Berkie is not irritated. Berkie is unreserved. Irvin is clamant. Kayle is waspish. Kayle is divided. If Irvin is exiguous then Irvin is not waspish. Smart things are clamant. If Kayle is exiguous and Kayle is not irritated then Kayle is divided. If Irvin is clamant then Irvin is exiguous. All divided, irritated things are unreserved. If Berkie is not clamant then Berkie is waspish. Irvin is not deckled.", "logic": "\nDeckled(nananne)\nExiguous(nananne)\nDivided(nananne)\nnot Irritated(nananne)\nUnreserved(nananne)\nWaspish(berkie)\nnot Exiguous(berkie)\nnot Irritated(berkie)\nUnreserved(berkie)\nClamant(irvin)\nWaspish(kayle)\nDivided(kayle)\nExiguous(irvin) -> not Waspish(irvin)\nforall x (Irritated(x) -> Clamant(x))\nExiguous(kayle) and not Irritated(kayle) -> Divided(kayle)\nClamant(irvin) -> Exiguous(irvin)\nforall x (Divided(x) and Irritated(x) -> Unreserved(x))\nnot Clamant(berkie) -> Waspish(berkie)\n\nnot Deckled(irvin)\n\nnot Deckled(irvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Cherin is cormose. Cherin is realistic. Cherin is toed. Cherin is not doubtful. Cherin is jawed. Allison is captious. Allison is not realistic. Allison is not doubtful. Allison is jawed. Dorisa is attachable. Harvie is captious. Harvie is toed. If Dorisa is realistic then Dorisa is not captious. Smart things are attachable. If Harvie is realistic and Harvie is not doubtful then Harvie is toed. If Dorisa is attachable then Dorisa is realistic. All toed, doubtful things are jawed. If Allison is not attachable then Allison is captious. Harvie is doubtful.", "logic": "\nCormose(cherin)\nRealistic(cherin)\nToed(cherin)\nnot Doubtful(cherin)\nJawed(cherin)\nCaptious(allison)\nnot Realistic(allison)\nnot Doubtful(allison)\nJawed(allison)\nAttachable(dorisa)\nCaptious(harvie)\nToed(harvie)\nRealistic(dorisa) -> not Captious(dorisa)\nforall x (Doubtful(x) -> Attachable(x))\nRealistic(harvie) and not Doubtful(harvie) -> Toed(harvie)\nAttachable(dorisa) -> Realistic(dorisa)\nforall x (Toed(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Jawed(x))\nnot Attachable(allison) -> Captious(allison)\n\nDoubtful(harvie)\n\nDoubtful(harvie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1306"} {"premises": "Clarey is spendable. Clarey is geothermal. Alfonso is spendable. Alfonso is geothermal. Alfonso is commensal. Dyann is spendable. Dyann is undesirous. Dyann is lazy. Dyann is commensal. Dyann is unrhymed. If someone is undesirous then they are moated. Young, moated people are geothermal. Dyann is lazy.", "logic": "\nSpendable(clarey)\nGeothermal(clarey)\nSpendable(alfonso)\nGeothermal(alfonso)\nCommensal(alfonso)\nSpendable(dyann)\nUndesirous(dyann)\nLazy(dyann)\nCommensal(dyann)\nUnrhymed(dyann)\nforall x (Undesirous(x) -> Moated(x))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and Moated(x) -> Geothermal(x))\n\nLazy(dyann)\n\ntherefore Lazy(dyann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Kimmo is unfastened. Kimmo is twee. Spence is unfastened. Spence is twee. Spence is unsexy. Gwendolyn is unfastened. Gwendolyn is defamatory. Gwendolyn is personal. Gwendolyn is unsexy. Gwendolyn is snuff. If someone is defamatory then they are tentacular. Young, tentacular people are twee. Gwendolyn is not defamatory.", "logic": "\nUnfastened(kimmo)\nTwee(kimmo)\nUnfastened(spence)\nTwee(spence)\nUnsexy(spence)\nUnfastened(gwendolyn)\nDefamatory(gwendolyn)\nPersonal(gwendolyn)\nUnsexy(gwendolyn)\nSnuff(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Defamatory(x) -> Tentacular(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x) and Tentacular(x) -> Twee(x))\n\nnot Defamatory(gwendolyn)\n\ntherefore Defamatory(gwendolyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Jeramie is intestate. Jeramie is marian. Iggie is intestate. Iggie is marian. Iggie is coequal. Linzy is intestate. Linzy is lawless. Linzy is atrophic. Linzy is coequal. Linzy is aleuronic. If someone is lawless then they are nimble. Young, nimble people are marian. Linzy is nimble.", "logic": "\nIntestate(jeramie)\nMarian(jeramie)\nIntestate(iggie)\nMarian(iggie)\nCoequal(iggie)\nIntestate(linzy)\nLawless(linzy)\nAtrophic(linzy)\nCoequal(linzy)\nAleuronic(linzy)\nforall x (Lawless(x) -> Nimble(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Nimble(x) -> Marian(x))\n\nNimble(linzy)\n\nLawless(linzy) and forall x (Lawless(x) -> Nimble(x)) -> therefore Nimble(linzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Piet is vitreous. Piet is haemic. Adrienne is vitreous. Adrienne is haemic. Adrienne is saved. Mervin is vitreous. Mervin is didactic. Mervin is timorese. Mervin is saved. Mervin is obviating. If someone is didactic then they are formed. Young, formed people are haemic. Mervin is not formed.", "logic": "\nVitreous(piet)\nHaemic(piet)\nVitreous(adrienne)\nHaemic(adrienne)\nSaved(adrienne)\nVitreous(mervin)\nDidactic(mervin)\nTimorese(mervin)\nSaved(mervin)\nObviating(mervin)\nforall x (Didactic(x) -> Formed(x))\nforall x (Obviating(x) and Formed(x) -> Haemic(x))\n\nnot Formed(mervin)\n\nDidactic(mervin) and forall x (Didactic(x) -> Formed(x)) -> therefore Formed(mervin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Tiana is cubic. Tiana is ubiquitous. Ellette is cubic. Ellette is ubiquitous. Ellette is wedded. Emile is cubic. Emile is homosexual. Emile is lymphatic. Emile is wedded. Emile is loyal. If someone is homosexual then they are looseleaf. Young, looseleaf people are ubiquitous. Emile is ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nCubic(tiana)\nUbiquitous(tiana)\nCubic(ellette)\nUbiquitous(ellette)\nWedded(ellette)\nCubic(emile)\nHomosexual(emile)\nLymphatic(emile)\nWedded(emile)\nLoyal(emile)\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\n\nUbiquitous(emile)\n\nHomosexual(emile) and forall x (Homosexual(x) -> Looseleaf(x)) -> therefore Looseleaf(emile) Loyal(emile) and Looseleaf(emile) and forall x (Loyal(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Ubiquitous(x)) -> therefore Ubiquitous(emile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Tamara is unlighted. Tamara is plumelike. Oralla is unlighted. Oralla is plumelike. Oralla is unclothed. Idaline is unlighted. Idaline is polish. Idaline is ocher. Idaline is unclothed. Idaline is littoral. If someone is polish then they are arcuate. Young, arcuate people are plumelike. Idaline is not plumelike.", "logic": "\nUnlighted(tamara)\nPlumelike(tamara)\nUnlighted(oralla)\nPlumelike(oralla)\nUnclothed(oralla)\nUnlighted(idaline)\nPolish(idaline)\nOcher(idaline)\nUnclothed(idaline)\nLittoral(idaline)\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Arcuate(x))\nforall x (Littoral(x) and Arcuate(x) -> Plumelike(x))\n\nnot Plumelike(idaline)\n\nPolish(idaline) and forall x (Polish(x) -> Arcuate(x)) -> therefore Arcuate(idaline) Littoral(idaline) and Arcuate(idaline) and forall x (Littoral(x) and Arcuate(x) -> Plumelike(x)) -> therefore Plumelike(idaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Savina is plutonic. Savina is averse. Charmain is plutonic. Charmain is averse. Charmain is transitory. Lilian is plutonic. Lilian is mantic. Lilian is cosmetic. Lilian is transitory. Lilian is precious. If someone is mantic then they are consular. Young, consular people are averse. Charmain is not consular.", "logic": "\nPlutonic(savina)\nAverse(savina)\nPlutonic(charmain)\nAverse(charmain)\nTransitory(charmain)\nPlutonic(lilian)\nMantic(lilian)\nCosmetic(lilian)\nTransitory(lilian)\nPrecious(lilian)\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Consular(x))\nforall x (Precious(x) and Consular(x) -> Averse(x))\n\nnot Consular(charmain)\n\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Consular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Geoffry is untamed. Geoffry is scottish. Jake is untamed. Jake is scottish. Jake is cardboard. Athene is untamed. Athene is jacobean. Athene is crowned. Athene is cardboard. Athene is grenadian. If someone is jacobean then they are speechless. Young, speechless people are scottish. Geoffry is speechless.", "logic": "\nUntamed(geoffry)\nScottish(geoffry)\nUntamed(jake)\nScottish(jake)\nCardboard(jake)\nUntamed(athene)\nJacobean(athene)\nCrowned(athene)\nCardboard(athene)\nGrenadian(athene)\nforall x (Jacobean(x) -> Speechless(x))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Speechless(x) -> Scottish(x))\n\nSpeechless(geoffry)\n\nforall x (Jacobean(x) -> Speechless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Troy is alright. Troy is prototypal. Merrilee is alright. Merrilee is prototypal. Merrilee is fusible. Merrielle is alright. Merrielle is vitalizing. Merrielle is dressy. Merrielle is fusible. Merrielle is submerged. If someone is vitalizing then they are enigmatic. Young, enigmatic people are prototypal. Troy is not vitalizing.", "logic": "\nAlright(troy)\nPrototypal(troy)\nAlright(merrilee)\nPrototypal(merrilee)\nFusible(merrilee)\nAlright(merrielle)\nVitalizing(merrielle)\nDressy(merrielle)\nFusible(merrielle)\nSubmerged(merrielle)\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) -> Enigmatic(x))\nforall x (Submerged(x) and Enigmatic(x) -> Prototypal(x))\n\nnot Vitalizing(troy)\n\nnot Vitalizing(troy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Harvard is unpitying. Harvard is senescent. Beatrisa is unpitying. Beatrisa is senescent. Beatrisa is lubricated. Lionello is unpitying. Lionello is ampullary. Lionello is andante. Lionello is lubricated. Lionello is spurious. If someone is ampullary then they are austral. Young, austral people are senescent. Beatrisa is spurious.", "logic": "\nUnpitying(harvard)\nSenescent(harvard)\nUnpitying(beatrisa)\nSenescent(beatrisa)\nLubricated(beatrisa)\nUnpitying(lionello)\nAmpullary(lionello)\nAndante(lionello)\nLubricated(lionello)\nSpurious(lionello)\nforall x (Ampullary(x) -> Austral(x))\nforall x (Spurious(x) and Austral(x) -> Senescent(x))\n\nSpurious(beatrisa)\n\nSpurious(beatrisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Lurlene is estonian. Lurlene is lossy. Larisa is estonian. Larisa is lossy. Larisa is drowsing. Dominick is estonian. Dominick is disorderly. Dominick is copulatory. Dominick is drowsing. Dominick is endogamic. If someone is disorderly then they are petalous. Young, petalous people are lossy. Larisa is not copulatory.", "logic": "\nEstonian(lurlene)\nLossy(lurlene)\nEstonian(larisa)\nLossy(larisa)\nDrowsing(larisa)\nEstonian(dominick)\nDisorderly(dominick)\nCopulatory(dominick)\nDrowsing(dominick)\nEndogamic(dominick)\nforall x (Disorderly(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Endogamic(x) and Petalous(x) -> Lossy(x))\n\nnot Copulatory(larisa)\n\nnot Copulatory(larisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "Lynnell is undetected. Lynnell is galore. Lefty is undetected. Lefty is galore. Lefty is normative. Rosaline is undetected. Rosaline is autoimmune. Rosaline is bifurcate. Rosaline is normative. Rosaline is botonee. If someone is autoimmune then they are solid. Young, solid people are galore. Lynnell is bifurcate.", "logic": "\nUndetected(lynnell)\nGalore(lynnell)\nUndetected(lefty)\nGalore(lefty)\nNormative(lefty)\nUndetected(rosaline)\nAutoimmune(rosaline)\nBifurcate(rosaline)\nNormative(rosaline)\nBotonee(rosaline)\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Solid(x))\nforall x (Botonee(x) and Solid(x) -> Galore(x))\n\nBifurcate(lynnell)\n\nBifurcate(lynnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1462"} {"premises": "The sibilla weather the row. The tawnya weather the grace. The tawnya weather the row. The tawnya is literary. The tawnya is cautious. The tawnya footslog the sibilla. The tawnya footslog the grace. The tawnya footslog the row. The tawnya anatomise the sibilla. The tawnya anatomise the grace. The grace weather the sibilla. The grace weather the row. The grace is literary. The grace anatomise the sibilla. The row footslog the sibilla. If something is nutbrown then it is twinkling. If the tawnya weather the grace then the grace is nutbrown. If something is axile then it footslog the sibilla. The tawnya weather the grace.", "logic": "\nWeather(sibilla, row)\nWeather(tawnya, grace)\nWeather(tawnya, row)\nLiterary(tawnya)\nCautious(tawnya)\nFootslog(tawnya, sibilla)\nFootslog(tawnya, grace)\nFootslog(tawnya, row)\nAnatomise(tawnya, sibilla)\nAnatomise(tawnya, grace)\nWeather(grace, sibilla)\nWeather(grace, row)\nLiterary(grace)\nAnatomise(grace, sibilla)\nFootslog(row, sibilla)\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) -> Twinkling(x))\nWeather(tawnya, grace) -> Nutbrown(grace)\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Footslog(x, sibilla))\n\nWeather(tawnya, grace)\n\ntherefore Weather(tawnya, grace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The karina apologise the nico. The kathryne apologise the louisette. The kathryne apologise the nico. The kathryne is seasonal. The kathryne is begotten. The kathryne mosh the karina. The kathryne mosh the louisette. The kathryne mosh the nico. The kathryne hark the karina. The kathryne hark the louisette. The louisette apologise the karina. The louisette apologise the nico. The louisette is seasonal. The louisette hark the karina. The nico mosh the karina. If something is textual then it is consumable. If the kathryne apologise the louisette then the louisette is textual. If something is statuesque then it mosh the karina. The nico does not like the karina.", "logic": "\nApologise(karina, nico)\nApologise(kathryne, louisette)\nApologise(kathryne, nico)\nSeasonal(kathryne)\nBegotten(kathryne)\nMosh(kathryne, karina)\nMosh(kathryne, louisette)\nMosh(kathryne, nico)\nHark(kathryne, karina)\nHark(kathryne, louisette)\nApologise(louisette, karina)\nApologise(louisette, nico)\nSeasonal(louisette)\nHark(louisette, karina)\nMosh(nico, karina)\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Consumable(x))\nApologise(kathryne, louisette) -> Textual(louisette)\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> Mosh(x, karina))\n\nnot Mosh(nico, karina)\n\ntherefore Mosh(nico, karina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The jandy twitch the tull. The megan twitch the theadora. The megan twitch the tull. The megan is unuseable. The megan is oriental. The megan prohibit the jandy. The megan prohibit the theadora. The megan prohibit the tull. The megan hurl the jandy. The megan hurl the theadora. The theadora twitch the jandy. The theadora twitch the tull. The theadora is unuseable. The theadora hurl the jandy. The tull prohibit the jandy. If something is borated then it is shattered. If the megan twitch the theadora then the theadora is borated. If something is attainable then it prohibit the jandy. The theadora is borated.", "logic": "\nTwitch(jandy, tull)\nTwitch(megan, theadora)\nTwitch(megan, tull)\nUnuseable(megan)\nOriental(megan)\nProhibit(megan, jandy)\nProhibit(megan, theadora)\nProhibit(megan, tull)\nHurl(megan, jandy)\nHurl(megan, theadora)\nTwitch(theadora, jandy)\nTwitch(theadora, tull)\nUnuseable(theadora)\nHurl(theadora, jandy)\nProhibit(tull, jandy)\nforall x (Borated(x) -> Shattered(x))\nTwitch(megan, theadora) -> Borated(theadora)\nforall x (Attainable(x) -> Prohibit(x, jandy))\n\nBorated(theadora)\n\nTwitch(megan, theadora) and Twitch(megan, theadora) -> Borated(theadora) -> therefore Borated(theadora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The earl discomfit the brenda. The lucy discomfit the eimile. The lucy discomfit the brenda. The lucy is downcast. The lucy is especial. The lucy prefer the earl. The lucy prefer the eimile. The lucy prefer the brenda. The lucy misspeak the earl. The lucy misspeak the eimile. The eimile discomfit the earl. The eimile discomfit the brenda. The eimile is downcast. The eimile misspeak the earl. The brenda prefer the earl. If something is weakening then it is global. If the lucy discomfit the eimile then the eimile is weakening. If something is binominal then it prefer the earl. The eimile is not weakening.", "logic": "\nDiscomfit(earl, brenda)\nDiscomfit(lucy, eimile)\nDiscomfit(lucy, brenda)\nDowncast(lucy)\nEspecial(lucy)\nPrefer(lucy, earl)\nPrefer(lucy, eimile)\nPrefer(lucy, brenda)\nMisspeak(lucy, earl)\nMisspeak(lucy, eimile)\nDiscomfit(eimile, earl)\nDiscomfit(eimile, brenda)\nDowncast(eimile)\nMisspeak(eimile, earl)\nPrefer(brenda, earl)\nforall x (Weakening(x) -> Global(x))\nDiscomfit(lucy, eimile) -> Weakening(eimile)\nforall x (Binominal(x) -> Prefer(x, earl))\n\nnot Weakening(eimile)\n\nDiscomfit(lucy, eimile) and Discomfit(lucy, eimile) -> Weakening(eimile) -> therefore Weakening(eimile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The bruce champion the mellicent. The marrilee champion the teddi. The marrilee champion the mellicent. The marrilee is volcanic. The marrilee is smitten. The marrilee lock the bruce. The marrilee lock the teddi. The marrilee lock the mellicent. The marrilee acquiesce the bruce. The marrilee acquiesce the teddi. The teddi champion the bruce. The teddi champion the mellicent. The teddi is volcanic. The teddi acquiesce the bruce. The mellicent lock the bruce. If something is labile then it is unscathed. If the marrilee champion the teddi then the teddi is labile. If something is accessible then it lock the bruce. The teddi is unscathed.", "logic": "\nChampion(bruce, mellicent)\nChampion(marrilee, teddi)\nChampion(marrilee, mellicent)\nVolcanic(marrilee)\nSmitten(marrilee)\nLock(marrilee, bruce)\nLock(marrilee, teddi)\nLock(marrilee, mellicent)\nAcquiesce(marrilee, bruce)\nAcquiesce(marrilee, teddi)\nChampion(teddi, bruce)\nChampion(teddi, mellicent)\nVolcanic(teddi)\nAcquiesce(teddi, bruce)\nLock(mellicent, bruce)\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Unscathed(x))\nChampion(marrilee, teddi) -> Labile(teddi)\nforall x (Accessible(x) -> Lock(x, bruce))\n\nUnscathed(teddi)\n\nChampion(marrilee, teddi) and Champion(marrilee, teddi) -> Labile(teddi) -> therefore Labile(teddi) Labile(teddi) and forall x (Labile(x) -> Unscathed(x)) -> therefore Unscathed(teddi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The vonny metrify the priscella. The binky metrify the sully. The binky metrify the priscella. The binky is unlikeable. The binky is mobbish. The binky wholesale the vonny. The binky wholesale the sully. The binky wholesale the priscella. The binky ball the vonny. The binky ball the sully. The sully metrify the vonny. The sully metrify the priscella. The sully is unlikeable. The sully ball the vonny. The priscella wholesale the vonny. If something is iliac then it is worsening. If the binky metrify the sully then the sully is iliac. If something is certified then it wholesale the vonny. The sully is not worsening.", "logic": "\nMetrify(vonny, priscella)\nMetrify(binky, sully)\nMetrify(binky, priscella)\nUnlikeable(binky)\nMobbish(binky)\nWholesale(binky, vonny)\nWholesale(binky, sully)\nWholesale(binky, priscella)\nBall(binky, vonny)\nBall(binky, sully)\nMetrify(sully, vonny)\nMetrify(sully, priscella)\nUnlikeable(sully)\nBall(sully, vonny)\nWholesale(priscella, vonny)\nforall x (Iliac(x) -> Worsening(x))\nMetrify(binky, sully) -> Iliac(sully)\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Wholesale(x, vonny))\n\nnot Worsening(sully)\n\nMetrify(binky, sully) and Metrify(binky, sully) -> Iliac(sully) -> therefore Iliac(sully) Iliac(sully) and forall x (Iliac(x) -> Worsening(x)) -> therefore Worsening(sully)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The elric insist the sharna. The cindelyn insist the miquela. The cindelyn insist the sharna. The cindelyn is frizzly. The cindelyn is frigorific. The cindelyn capsulate the elric. The cindelyn capsulate the miquela. The cindelyn capsulate the sharna. The cindelyn shave the elric. The cindelyn shave the miquela. The miquela insist the elric. The miquela insist the sharna. The miquela is frizzly. The miquela shave the elric. The sharna capsulate the elric. If something is postal then it is latish. If the cindelyn insist the miquela then the miquela is postal. If something is praising then it capsulate the elric. The sharna is not latish.", "logic": "\nInsist(elric, sharna)\nInsist(cindelyn, miquela)\nInsist(cindelyn, sharna)\nFrizzly(cindelyn)\nFrigorific(cindelyn)\nCapsulate(cindelyn, elric)\nCapsulate(cindelyn, miquela)\nCapsulate(cindelyn, sharna)\nShave(cindelyn, elric)\nShave(cindelyn, miquela)\nInsist(miquela, elric)\nInsist(miquela, sharna)\nFrizzly(miquela)\nShave(miquela, elric)\nCapsulate(sharna, elric)\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Latish(x))\nInsist(cindelyn, miquela) -> Postal(miquela)\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Capsulate(x, elric))\n\nnot Latish(sharna)\n\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Latish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The gayleen stifle the christine. The harlie stifle the roze. The harlie stifle the christine. The harlie is protestant. The harlie is binominal. The harlie holler the gayleen. The harlie holler the roze. The harlie holler the christine. The harlie purse the gayleen. The harlie purse the roze. The roze stifle the gayleen. The roze stifle the christine. The roze is protestant. The roze purse the gayleen. The christine holler the gayleen. If something is anodal then it is protean. If the harlie stifle the roze then the roze is anodal. If something is moral then it holler the gayleen. The gayleen is protean.", "logic": "\nStifle(gayleen, christine)\nStifle(harlie, roze)\nStifle(harlie, christine)\nProtestant(harlie)\nBinominal(harlie)\nHoller(harlie, gayleen)\nHoller(harlie, roze)\nHoller(harlie, christine)\nPurse(harlie, gayleen)\nPurse(harlie, roze)\nStifle(roze, gayleen)\nStifle(roze, christine)\nProtestant(roze)\nPurse(roze, gayleen)\nHoller(christine, gayleen)\nforall x (Anodal(x) -> Protean(x))\nStifle(harlie, roze) -> Anodal(roze)\nforall x (Moral(x) -> Holler(x, gayleen))\n\nProtean(gayleen)\n\nforall x (Anodal(x) -> Protean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The jennee rate the xymenes. The hyacintha rate the valeda. The hyacintha rate the xymenes. The hyacintha is musky. The hyacintha is limited. The hyacintha room the jennee. The hyacintha room the valeda. The hyacintha room the xymenes. The hyacintha recite the jennee. The hyacintha recite the valeda. The valeda rate the jennee. The valeda rate the xymenes. The valeda is musky. The valeda recite the jennee. The xymenes room the jennee. If something is unflawed then it is undirected. If the hyacintha rate the valeda then the valeda is unflawed. If something is infernal then it room the jennee. The jennee does not like the jennee.", "logic": "\nRate(jennee, xymenes)\nRate(hyacintha, valeda)\nRate(hyacintha, xymenes)\nMusky(hyacintha)\nLimited(hyacintha)\nRoom(hyacintha, jennee)\nRoom(hyacintha, valeda)\nRoom(hyacintha, xymenes)\nRecite(hyacintha, jennee)\nRecite(hyacintha, valeda)\nRate(valeda, jennee)\nRate(valeda, xymenes)\nMusky(valeda)\nRecite(valeda, jennee)\nRoom(xymenes, jennee)\nforall x (Unflawed(x) -> Undirected(x))\nRate(hyacintha, valeda) -> Unflawed(valeda)\nforall x (Infernal(x) -> Room(x, jennee))\n\nnot Room(jennee, jennee)\n\nforall x (Infernal(x) -> Room(x, jennee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The rochette divulge the wendel. The feodora divulge the sherill. The feodora divulge the wendel. The feodora is foolhardy. The feodora is drowsing. The feodora sweat the rochette. The feodora sweat the sherill. The feodora sweat the wendel. The feodora decompose the rochette. The feodora decompose the sherill. The sherill divulge the rochette. The sherill divulge the wendel. The sherill is foolhardy. The sherill decompose the rochette. The wendel sweat the rochette. If something is prolix then it is katari. If the feodora divulge the sherill then the sherill is prolix. If something is burundi then it sweat the rochette. The rochette decompose the feodora.", "logic": "\nDivulge(rochette, wendel)\nDivulge(feodora, sherill)\nDivulge(feodora, wendel)\nFoolhardy(feodora)\nDrowsing(feodora)\nSweat(feodora, rochette)\nSweat(feodora, sherill)\nSweat(feodora, wendel)\nDecompose(feodora, rochette)\nDecompose(feodora, sherill)\nDivulge(sherill, rochette)\nDivulge(sherill, wendel)\nFoolhardy(sherill)\nDecompose(sherill, rochette)\nSweat(wendel, rochette)\nforall x (Prolix(x) -> Katari(x))\nDivulge(feodora, sherill) -> Prolix(sherill)\nforall x (Burundi(x) -> Sweat(x, rochette))\n\nDecompose(rochette, feodora)\n\nDecompose(rochette, feodora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The sarge banquet the elizabeth. The codie banquet the patti. The codie banquet the elizabeth. The codie is lightproof. The codie is springlike. The codie parley the sarge. The codie parley the patti. The codie parley the elizabeth. The codie display the sarge. The codie display the patti. The patti banquet the sarge. The patti banquet the elizabeth. The patti is lightproof. The patti display the sarge. The elizabeth parley the sarge. If something is crushed then it is calycine. If the codie banquet the patti then the patti is crushed. If something is bedless then it parley the sarge. The codie is not crushed.", "logic": "\nBanquet(sarge, elizabeth)\nBanquet(codie, patti)\nBanquet(codie, elizabeth)\nLightproof(codie)\nSpringlike(codie)\nParley(codie, sarge)\nParley(codie, patti)\nParley(codie, elizabeth)\nDisplay(codie, sarge)\nDisplay(codie, patti)\nBanquet(patti, sarge)\nBanquet(patti, elizabeth)\nLightproof(patti)\nDisplay(patti, sarge)\nParley(elizabeth, sarge)\nforall x (Crushed(x) -> Calycine(x))\nBanquet(codie, patti) -> Crushed(patti)\nforall x (Bedless(x) -> Parley(x, sarge))\n\nnot Crushed(codie)\n\nnot Crushed(codie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The finley crab the rogers. The dawson crab the arturo. The dawson crab the rogers. The dawson is olive. The dawson is nonvisual. The dawson deterge the finley. The dawson deterge the arturo. The dawson deterge the rogers. The dawson liken the finley. The dawson liken the arturo. The arturo crab the finley. The arturo crab the rogers. The arturo is olive. The arturo liken the finley. The rogers deterge the finley. If something is graceful then it is armed. If the dawson crab the arturo then the arturo is graceful. If something is binate then it deterge the finley. The dawson liken the dawson.", "logic": "\nCrab(finley, rogers)\nCrab(dawson, arturo)\nCrab(dawson, rogers)\nOlive(dawson)\nNonvisual(dawson)\nDeterge(dawson, finley)\nDeterge(dawson, arturo)\nDeterge(dawson, rogers)\nLiken(dawson, finley)\nLiken(dawson, arturo)\nCrab(arturo, finley)\nCrab(arturo, rogers)\nOlive(arturo)\nLiken(arturo, finley)\nDeterge(rogers, finley)\nforall x (Graceful(x) -> Armed(x))\nCrab(dawson, arturo) -> Graceful(arturo)\nforall x (Binate(x) -> Deterge(x, finley))\n\nLiken(dawson, dawson)\n\nLiken(dawson, dawson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The redford is not breasted. The gregg sass the milly. The dorri is mohammedan. The milly sass the redford. If something buccaneer the gregg then it does not need the redford. If the gregg sass the milly then the gregg buccaneer the redford. If the gregg buccaneer the redford then the gregg does not eat the redford. The dorri is mohammedan.", "logic": "\nnot Breasted(redford)\nSass(gregg, milly)\nMohammedan(dorri)\nSass(milly, redford)\nforall x (Buccaneer(x, gregg) -> not Sass(x, redford))\nSass(gregg, milly) -> Buccaneer(gregg, redford)\nBuccaneer(gregg, redford) -> not Undergrow(gregg, redford)\n\nMohammedan(dorri)\n\ntherefore Mohammedan(dorri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The gerrie is not wonted. The mortimer symmetrize the teodoro. The fletch is magnetic. The teodoro symmetrize the gerrie. If something undo the mortimer then it does not need the gerrie. If the mortimer symmetrize the teodoro then the mortimer undo the gerrie. If the mortimer undo the gerrie then the mortimer does not eat the gerrie. The fletch is not magnetic.", "logic": "\nnot Wonted(gerrie)\nSymmetrize(mortimer, teodoro)\nMagnetic(fletch)\nSymmetrize(teodoro, gerrie)\nforall x (Undo(x, mortimer) -> not Symmetrize(x, gerrie))\nSymmetrize(mortimer, teodoro) -> Undo(mortimer, gerrie)\nUndo(mortimer, gerrie) -> not Neuter(mortimer, gerrie)\n\nnot Magnetic(fletch)\n\ntherefore Magnetic(fletch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The valentin is not commercial. The mariette undergird the cecilla. The nina is tomentous. The cecilla undergird the valentin. If something parse the mariette then it does not need the valentin. If the mariette undergird the cecilla then the mariette parse the valentin. If the mariette parse the valentin then the mariette does not eat the valentin. The mariette parse the valentin.", "logic": "\nnot Commercial(valentin)\nUndergird(mariette, cecilla)\nTomentous(nina)\nUndergird(cecilla, valentin)\nforall x (Parse(x, mariette) -> not Undergird(x, valentin))\nUndergird(mariette, cecilla) -> Parse(mariette, valentin)\nParse(mariette, valentin) -> not Displease(mariette, valentin)\n\nParse(mariette, valentin)\n\nUndergird(mariette, cecilla) and Undergird(mariette, cecilla) -> Parse(mariette, valentin) -> therefore Parse(mariette, valentin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The bonita is not draining. The rutger sinter the kerianne. The rufus is biramous. The kerianne sinter the bonita. If something mush the rutger then it does not need the bonita. If the rutger sinter the kerianne then the rutger mush the bonita. If the rutger mush the bonita then the rutger does not eat the bonita. The rutger does not visit the bonita.", "logic": "\nnot Draining(bonita)\nSinter(rutger, kerianne)\nBiramous(rufus)\nSinter(kerianne, bonita)\nforall x (Mush(x, rutger) -> not Sinter(x, bonita))\nSinter(rutger, kerianne) -> Mush(rutger, bonita)\nMush(rutger, bonita) -> not Barrage(rutger, bonita)\n\nnot Mush(rutger, bonita)\n\nSinter(rutger, kerianne) and Sinter(rutger, kerianne) -> Mush(rutger, bonita) -> therefore Mush(rutger, bonita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The prue is not unattired. The kristi burglarise the thorndike. The amalita is tubby. The thorndike burglarise the prue. If something pepper the kristi then it does not need the prue. If the kristi burglarise the thorndike then the kristi pepper the prue. If the kristi pepper the prue then the kristi does not eat the prue. The kristi does not eat the prue.", "logic": "\nnot Unattired(prue)\nBurglarise(kristi, thorndike)\nTubby(amalita)\nBurglarise(thorndike, prue)\nforall x (Pepper(x, kristi) -> not Burglarise(x, prue))\nBurglarise(kristi, thorndike) -> Pepper(kristi, prue)\nPepper(kristi, prue) -> not Disaffect(kristi, prue)\n\nnot Disaffect(kristi, prue)\n\nBurglarise(kristi, thorndike) and Burglarise(kristi, thorndike) -> Pepper(kristi, prue) -> therefore Pepper(kristi, prue) Pepper(kristi, prue) and Pepper(kristi, prue) -> not Disaffect(kristi, prue) -> therefore not Disaffect(kristi, prue)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The marmaduke is not iridic. The jenine sellotape the lenette. The stacee is metatarsal. The lenette sellotape the marmaduke. If something quack the jenine then it does not need the marmaduke. If the jenine sellotape the lenette then the jenine quack the marmaduke. If the jenine quack the marmaduke then the jenine does not eat the marmaduke. The jenine stink the marmaduke.", "logic": "\nnot Iridic(marmaduke)\nSellotape(jenine, lenette)\nMetatarsal(stacee)\nSellotape(lenette, marmaduke)\nforall x (Quack(x, jenine) -> not Sellotape(x, marmaduke))\nSellotape(jenine, lenette) -> Quack(jenine, marmaduke)\nQuack(jenine, marmaduke) -> not Stink(jenine, marmaduke)\n\nStink(jenine, marmaduke)\n\nSellotape(jenine, lenette) and Sellotape(jenine, lenette) -> Quack(jenine, marmaduke) -> therefore Quack(jenine, marmaduke) Quack(jenine, marmaduke) and Quack(jenine, marmaduke) -> not Stink(jenine, marmaduke) -> therefore not Stink(jenine, marmaduke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The yardley is not proud. The kenn embank the emmeline. The barbara is vested. The emmeline embank the yardley. If something uncrate the kenn then it does not need the yardley. If the kenn embank the emmeline then the kenn uncrate the yardley. If the kenn uncrate the yardley then the kenn does not eat the yardley. The emmeline does not visit the barbara.", "logic": "\nnot Proud(yardley)\nEmbank(kenn, emmeline)\nVested(barbara)\nEmbank(emmeline, yardley)\nforall x (Uncrate(x, kenn) -> not Embank(x, yardley))\nEmbank(kenn, emmeline) -> Uncrate(kenn, yardley)\nUncrate(kenn, yardley) -> not Patronage(kenn, yardley)\n\nnot Uncrate(emmeline, barbara)\n\nnot Uncrate(emmeline, barbara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The kath is not bated. The joellen deactivate the spence. The ajai is rimed. The spence deactivate the kath. If something march the joellen then it does not need the kath. If the joellen deactivate the spence then the joellen march the kath. If the joellen march the kath then the joellen does not eat the kath. The kath march the kath.", "logic": "\nnot Bated(kath)\nDeactivate(joellen, spence)\nRimed(ajai)\nDeactivate(spence, kath)\nforall x (March(x, joellen) -> not Deactivate(x, kath))\nDeactivate(joellen, spence) -> March(joellen, kath)\nMarch(joellen, kath) -> not Wench(joellen, kath)\n\nMarch(kath, kath)\n\nMarch(kath, kath) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The davidde is not roughish. The frayda moor the roni. The essie is unsaved. The roni moor the davidde. If something rankle the frayda then it does not need the davidde. If the frayda moor the roni then the frayda rankle the davidde. If the frayda rankle the davidde then the frayda does not eat the davidde. The davidde is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Roughish(davidde)\nMoor(frayda, roni)\nUnsaved(essie)\nMoor(roni, davidde)\nforall x (Rankle(x, frayda) -> not Moor(x, davidde))\nMoor(frayda, roni) -> Rankle(frayda, davidde)\nRankle(frayda, davidde) -> not Howl(frayda, davidde)\n\nnot Round(davidde)\n\nnot Round(davidde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The dynah is not leprous. The brewster diss the zak. The udale is here. The zak diss the dynah. If something subject the brewster then it does not need the dynah. If the brewster diss the zak then the brewster subject the dynah. If the brewster subject the dynah then the brewster does not eat the dynah. The dynah is cold.", "logic": "\nnot Leprous(dynah)\nDiss(brewster, zak)\nHere(udale)\nDiss(zak, dynah)\nforall x (Subject(x, brewster) -> not Diss(x, dynah))\nDiss(brewster, zak) -> Subject(brewster, dynah)\nSubject(brewster, dynah) -> not Darken(brewster, dynah)\n\nCold(dynah)\n\nCold(dynah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The suzanne is not beatified. The deedee squint the saxon. The blare is ratified. The saxon squint the suzanne. If something license the deedee then it does not need the suzanne. If the deedee squint the saxon then the deedee license the suzanne. If the deedee license the suzanne then the deedee does not eat the suzanne. The blare does not eat the saxon.", "logic": "\nnot Beatified(suzanne)\nSquint(deedee, saxon)\nRatified(blare)\nSquint(saxon, suzanne)\nforall x (License(x, deedee) -> not Squint(x, suzanne))\nSquint(deedee, saxon) -> License(deedee, suzanne)\nLicense(deedee, suzanne) -> not Needle(deedee, suzanne)\n\nnot Needle(blare, saxon)\n\nnot Needle(blare, saxon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "The juline is not sheeny. The vivian comment the blaine. The miquela is inspiring. The blaine comment the juline. If something dampen the vivian then it does not need the juline. If the vivian comment the blaine then the vivian dampen the juline. If the vivian dampen the juline then the vivian does not eat the juline. The miquela dampen the juline.", "logic": "\nnot Sheeny(juline)\nComment(vivian, blaine)\nInspiring(miquela)\nComment(blaine, juline)\nforall x (Dampen(x, vivian) -> not Comment(x, juline))\nComment(vivian, blaine) -> Dampen(vivian, juline)\nDampen(vivian, juline) -> not Vesicate(vivian, juline)\n\nDampen(miquela, juline)\n\nDampen(miquela, juline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1960"} {"premises": "Jesse is mediate. Corie is acellular. Corie is belated. Round things are communal. White things are tribal. Corie is acellular.", "logic": "\nMediate(jesse)\nAcellular(corie)\nBelated(corie)\nforall x (Mediate(x) -> Communal(x))\nforall x (Communal(x) -> Tribal(x))\n\nAcellular(corie)\n\ntherefore Acellular(corie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Melany is brunette. Rochester is vitiated. Rochester is cosmetic. Round things are stupefying. White things are unhindered. Rochester is not vitiated.", "logic": "\nBrunette(melany)\nVitiated(rochester)\nCosmetic(rochester)\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Stupefying(x))\nforall x (Stupefying(x) -> Unhindered(x))\n\nnot Vitiated(rochester)\n\ntherefore Vitiated(rochester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Cicily is iritic. Cassondra is alkaloidal. Cassondra is reptilian. Round things are theocratic. White things are clerical. Cicily is theocratic.", "logic": "\nIritic(cicily)\nAlkaloidal(cassondra)\nReptilian(cassondra)\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Theocratic(x))\nforall x (Theocratic(x) -> Clerical(x))\n\nTheocratic(cicily)\n\nIritic(cicily) and forall x (Iritic(x) -> Theocratic(x)) -> therefore Theocratic(cicily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Cati is pupal. Roby is nebulose. Roby is maroc. Round things are unassigned. White things are worth. Cati is not unassigned.", "logic": "\nPupal(cati)\nNebulose(roby)\nMaroc(roby)\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> Worth(x))\n\nnot Unassigned(cati)\n\nPupal(cati) and forall x (Pupal(x) -> Unassigned(x)) -> therefore Unassigned(cati)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Calida is untethered. Alissa is setose. Alissa is lacklustre. Round things are exegetical. White things are doric. Calida is doric.", "logic": "\nUntethered(calida)\nSetose(alissa)\nLacklustre(alissa)\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Exegetical(x))\nforall x (Exegetical(x) -> Doric(x))\n\nDoric(calida)\n\nUntethered(calida) and forall x (Untethered(x) -> Exegetical(x)) -> therefore Exegetical(calida) Exegetical(calida) and forall x (Exegetical(x) -> Doric(x)) -> therefore Doric(calida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Storey is laboured. Case is cardinal. Case is mangled. Round things are funicular. White things are haemal. Storey is not haemal.", "logic": "\nLaboured(storey)\nCardinal(case)\nMangled(case)\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> Funicular(x))\nforall x (Funicular(x) -> Haemal(x))\n\nnot Haemal(storey)\n\nLaboured(storey) and forall x (Laboured(x) -> Funicular(x)) -> therefore Funicular(storey) Funicular(storey) and forall x (Funicular(x) -> Haemal(x)) -> therefore Haemal(storey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Tannie is matured. Vasilis is american. Vasilis is woolen. Round things are unreported. White things are staid. Vasilis is not unreported.", "logic": "\nMatured(tannie)\nAmerican(vasilis)\nWoolen(vasilis)\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Unreported(x))\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Staid(x))\n\nnot Unreported(vasilis)\n\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Unreported(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Gypsy is tame. Joyan is quick. Joyan is dehydrated. Round things are mothproof. White things are thorny. Joyan is thorny.", "logic": "\nTame(gypsy)\nQuick(joyan)\nDehydrated(joyan)\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Mothproof(x) -> Thorny(x))\n\nThorny(joyan)\n\nforall x (Mothproof(x) -> Thorny(x)) <- forall x (Tame(x) -> Mothproof(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Keren is dyslexic. Spense is talismanic. Spense is verbalised. Round things are unpotted. White things are centennial. Keren is not talismanic.", "logic": "\nDyslexic(keren)\nTalismanic(spense)\nVerbalised(spense)\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) -> Centennial(x))\n\nnot Talismanic(keren)\n\nnot Talismanic(keren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Halie is ruined. Estella is tippy. Estella is deistic. Round things are sonant. White things are unlabelled. Halie is deistic.", "logic": "\nRuined(halie)\nTippy(estella)\nDeistic(estella)\nforall x (Ruined(x) -> Sonant(x))\nforall x (Sonant(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\n\nDeistic(halie)\n\nDeistic(halie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Gifford is jarring. Zechariah is unalarming. Zechariah is quartzose. Round things are weather. White things are maddening. Zechariah is not blue.", "logic": "\nJarring(gifford)\nUnalarming(zechariah)\nQuartzose(zechariah)\nforall x (Jarring(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) -> Maddening(x))\n\nnot Blue(zechariah)\n\nnot Blue(zechariah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Babette is facetious. Aleecia is mushy. Aleecia is reanimated. Round things are prohibited. White things are undersea. Aleecia is cold.", "logic": "\nFacetious(babette)\nMushy(aleecia)\nReanimated(aleecia)\nforall x (Facetious(x) -> Prohibited(x))\nforall x (Prohibited(x) -> Undersea(x))\n\nCold(aleecia)\n\nCold(aleecia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-766"} {"premises": "Paton is apologetic. Paton is greenhouse. Paton is fulsome. Paton is perennial. Emlyn is apologetic. Emlyn is fourfold. Emlyn is aground. Emlyn is fulsome. Emlyn is unplayful. Emlyn is perennial. Red things are aground. If Paton is perennial then Paton is unplayful. Big things are fourfold. Emlyn is perennial.", "logic": "\nApologetic(paton)\nGreenhouse(paton)\nFulsome(paton)\nPerennial(paton)\nApologetic(emlyn)\nFourfold(emlyn)\nAground(emlyn)\nFulsome(emlyn)\nUnplayful(emlyn)\nPerennial(emlyn)\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Aground(x))\nPerennial(paton) -> Unplayful(paton)\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Fourfold(x))\n\nPerennial(emlyn)\n\ntherefore Perennial(emlyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-843"} {"premises": "Karlie is hulking. Karlie is attenuate. Karlie is colonized. Karlie is drunk. Monica is hulking. Monica is coquettish. Monica is aberdonian. Monica is colonized. Monica is receivable. Monica is drunk. Red things are aberdonian. If Karlie is drunk then Karlie is receivable. Big things are coquettish. Monica is not colonized.", "logic": "\nHulking(karlie)\nAttenuate(karlie)\nColonized(karlie)\nDrunk(karlie)\nHulking(monica)\nCoquettish(monica)\nAberdonian(monica)\nColonized(monica)\nReceivable(monica)\nDrunk(monica)\nforall x (Receivable(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\nDrunk(karlie) -> Receivable(karlie)\nforall x (Hulking(x) -> Coquettish(x))\n\nnot Colonized(monica)\n\ntherefore Colonized(monica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-843"} {"premises": "Sheppard is cumbersome. Sheppard is footless. Sheppard is mothproof. Sheppard is valved. Mareah is cumbersome. Mareah is tripinnate. Mareah is vatic. Mareah is mothproof. Mareah is cuttable. Mareah is valved. Red things are vatic. If Sheppard is valved then Sheppard is cuttable. Big things are tripinnate. Sheppard is cuttable.", "logic": "\nCumbersome(sheppard)\nFootless(sheppard)\nMothproof(sheppard)\nValved(sheppard)\nCumbersome(mareah)\nTripinnate(mareah)\nVatic(mareah)\nMothproof(mareah)\nCuttable(mareah)\nValved(mareah)\nforall x (Cuttable(x) -> Vatic(x))\nValved(sheppard) -> Cuttable(sheppard)\nforall x (Cumbersome(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\n\nCuttable(sheppard)\n\nValved(sheppard) and Valved(sheppard) -> Cuttable(sheppard) -> therefore Cuttable(sheppard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-843"} {"premises": "Tamra is treed. Tamra is cuddly. Tamra is bettering. Tamra is dingy. Merrilee is treed. Merrilee is nonstop. Merrilee is unfed. Merrilee is bettering. Merrilee is keyless. Merrilee is dingy. Red things are unfed. If Tamra is dingy then Tamra is keyless. Big things are nonstop. Tamra is not nonstop.", "logic": "\nTreed(tamra)\nCuddly(tamra)\nBettering(tamra)\nDingy(tamra)\nTreed(merrilee)\nNonstop(merrilee)\nUnfed(merrilee)\nBettering(merrilee)\nKeyless(merrilee)\nDingy(merrilee)\nforall x (Keyless(x) -> Unfed(x))\nDingy(tamra) -> Keyless(tamra)\nforall x (Treed(x) -> Nonstop(x))\n\nnot Nonstop(tamra)\n\nTreed(tamra) and forall x (Treed(x) -> Nonstop(x)) -> therefore Nonstop(tamra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-843"} {"premises": "Paolo is doughy. Paolo is stalwart. Paolo is immortal. Paolo is threefold. Sile is doughy. Sile is aecial. Sile is gullible. Sile is immortal. Sile is unalloyed. Sile is threefold. Red things are gullible. If Paolo is threefold then Paolo is unalloyed. Big things are aecial. Paolo is gullible.", "logic": "\nDoughy(paolo)\nStalwart(paolo)\nImmortal(paolo)\nThreefold(paolo)\nDoughy(sile)\nAecial(sile)\nGullible(sile)\nImmortal(sile)\nUnalloyed(sile)\nThreefold(sile)\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) -> Gullible(x))\nThreefold(paolo) -> Unalloyed(paolo)\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Aecial(x))\n\nGullible(paolo)\n\nThreefold(paolo) and Threefold(paolo) -> Unalloyed(paolo) -> therefore Unalloyed(paolo) Unalloyed(paolo) and forall x (Unalloyed(x) -> Gullible(x)) -> therefore Gullible(paolo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-843"} {"premises": "Rhodia is jesting. Rhodia is puffy. Rhodia is insipid. Rhodia is raffish. Beale is jesting. Beale is unstudious. Beale is acentric. Beale is insipid. Beale is edentulous. Beale is raffish. Red things are acentric. If Rhodia is raffish then Rhodia is edentulous. Big things are unstudious. Rhodia is not acentric.", "logic": "\nJesting(rhodia)\nPuffy(rhodia)\nInsipid(rhodia)\nRaffish(rhodia)\nJesting(beale)\nUnstudious(beale)\nAcentric(beale)\nInsipid(beale)\nEdentulous(beale)\nRaffish(beale)\nforall x (Edentulous(x) -> Acentric(x))\nRaffish(rhodia) -> Edentulous(rhodia)\nforall x (Jesting(x) -> Unstudious(x))\n\nnot Acentric(rhodia)\n\nRaffish(rhodia) and Raffish(rhodia) -> Edentulous(rhodia) -> therefore Edentulous(rhodia) Edentulous(rhodia) and forall x (Edentulous(x) -> Acentric(x)) -> therefore Acentric(rhodia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-843"} {"premises": "The fanya does not need the mariellen. The leonora is much. The leonora foreswear the mariellen. The mariellen is cenobitic. The mariellen beshrew the fanya. The mariellen does not need the fanya. The mariellen foreswear the leonora. If the leonora beshrew the fanya then the leonora is subarctic. If the leonora foreswear the mariellen then the leonora beshrew the fanya. The mariellen does not need the fanya.", "logic": "\nnot Foreswear(fanya, mariellen)\nMuch(leonora)\nForeswear(leonora, mariellen)\nCenobitic(mariellen)\nBeshrew(mariellen, fanya)\nnot Foreswear(mariellen, fanya)\nForeswear(mariellen, leonora)\nBeshrew(leonora, fanya) -> Subarctic(leonora)\nForeswear(leonora, mariellen) -> Beshrew(leonora, fanya)\n\nnot Foreswear(mariellen, fanya)\n\ntherefore not Foreswear(mariellen, fanya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The paulita does not need the darleen. The pollyanna is perfidious. The pollyanna unstring the darleen. The darleen is captious. The darleen previse the paulita. The darleen does not need the paulita. The darleen unstring the pollyanna. If the pollyanna previse the paulita then the pollyanna is askant. If the pollyanna unstring the darleen then the pollyanna previse the paulita. The pollyanna does not need the darleen.", "logic": "\nnot Unstring(paulita, darleen)\nPerfidious(pollyanna)\nUnstring(pollyanna, darleen)\nCaptious(darleen)\nPrevise(darleen, paulita)\nnot Unstring(darleen, paulita)\nUnstring(darleen, pollyanna)\nPrevise(pollyanna, paulita) -> Askant(pollyanna)\nUnstring(pollyanna, darleen) -> Previse(pollyanna, paulita)\n\nnot Unstring(pollyanna, darleen)\n\ntherefore Unstring(pollyanna, darleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The cynthea does not need the angelika. The stefania is numeral. The stefania bypass the angelika. The angelika is probatory. The angelika hammer the cynthea. The angelika does not need the cynthea. The angelika bypass the stefania. If the stefania hammer the cynthea then the stefania is romanic. If the stefania bypass the angelika then the stefania hammer the cynthea. The stefania hammer the cynthea.", "logic": "\nnot Bypass(cynthea, angelika)\nNumeral(stefania)\nBypass(stefania, angelika)\nProbatory(angelika)\nHammer(angelika, cynthea)\nnot Bypass(angelika, cynthea)\nBypass(angelika, stefania)\nHammer(stefania, cynthea) -> Romanic(stefania)\nBypass(stefania, angelika) -> Hammer(stefania, cynthea)\n\nHammer(stefania, cynthea)\n\nBypass(stefania, angelika) and Bypass(stefania, angelika) -> Hammer(stefania, cynthea) -> therefore Hammer(stefania, cynthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The leon does not need the deonne. The lazlo is diligent. The lazlo chance the deonne. The deonne is starting. The deonne bloat the leon. The deonne does not need the leon. The deonne chance the lazlo. If the lazlo bloat the leon then the lazlo is ignited. If the lazlo chance the deonne then the lazlo bloat the leon. The lazlo does not like the leon.", "logic": "\nnot Chance(leon, deonne)\nDiligent(lazlo)\nChance(lazlo, deonne)\nStarting(deonne)\nBloat(deonne, leon)\nnot Chance(deonne, leon)\nChance(deonne, lazlo)\nBloat(lazlo, leon) -> Ignited(lazlo)\nChance(lazlo, deonne) -> Bloat(lazlo, leon)\n\nnot Bloat(lazlo, leon)\n\nChance(lazlo, deonne) and Chance(lazlo, deonne) -> Bloat(lazlo, leon) -> therefore Bloat(lazlo, leon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The neal does not need the shandee. The laetitia is unobliging. The laetitia liberate the shandee. The shandee is bryophytic. The shandee overact the neal. The shandee does not need the neal. The shandee liberate the laetitia. If the laetitia overact the neal then the laetitia is kantian. If the laetitia liberate the shandee then the laetitia overact the neal. The laetitia is kantian.", "logic": "\nnot Liberate(neal, shandee)\nUnobliging(laetitia)\nLiberate(laetitia, shandee)\nBryophytic(shandee)\nOveract(shandee, neal)\nnot Liberate(shandee, neal)\nLiberate(shandee, laetitia)\nOveract(laetitia, neal) -> Kantian(laetitia)\nLiberate(laetitia, shandee) -> Overact(laetitia, neal)\n\nKantian(laetitia)\n\nLiberate(laetitia, shandee) and Liberate(laetitia, shandee) -> Overact(laetitia, neal) -> therefore Overact(laetitia, neal) Overact(laetitia, neal) and Overact(laetitia, neal) -> Kantian(laetitia) -> therefore Kantian(laetitia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The deerdre does not need the madella. The garwin is befitting. The garwin cere the madella. The madella is censored. The madella pound the deerdre. The madella does not need the deerdre. The madella cere the garwin. If the garwin pound the deerdre then the garwin is utterable. If the garwin cere the madella then the garwin pound the deerdre. The garwin is not utterable.", "logic": "\nnot Cere(deerdre, madella)\nBefitting(garwin)\nCere(garwin, madella)\nCensored(madella)\nPound(madella, deerdre)\nnot Cere(madella, deerdre)\nCere(madella, garwin)\nPound(garwin, deerdre) -> Utterable(garwin)\nCere(garwin, madella) -> Pound(garwin, deerdre)\n\nnot Utterable(garwin)\n\nCere(garwin, madella) and Cere(garwin, madella) -> Pound(garwin, deerdre) -> therefore Pound(garwin, deerdre) Pound(garwin, deerdre) and Pound(garwin, deerdre) -> Utterable(garwin) -> therefore Utterable(garwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The rochester does not need the godwin. The blare is hyoid. The blare womanize the godwin. The godwin is estrogenic. The godwin contrive the rochester. The godwin does not need the rochester. The godwin womanize the blare. If the blare contrive the rochester then the blare is beta. If the blare womanize the godwin then the blare contrive the rochester. The blare is not estrogenic.", "logic": "\nnot Womanize(rochester, godwin)\nHyoid(blare)\nWomanize(blare, godwin)\nEstrogenic(godwin)\nContrive(godwin, rochester)\nnot Womanize(godwin, rochester)\nWomanize(godwin, blare)\nContrive(blare, rochester) -> Beta(blare)\nWomanize(blare, godwin) -> Contrive(blare, rochester)\n\nnot Estrogenic(blare)\n\nnot Estrogenic(blare) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The nora does not need the tyson. The henrietta is beneficial. The henrietta task the tyson. The tyson is ferocious. The tyson blush the nora. The tyson does not need the nora. The tyson task the henrietta. If the henrietta blush the nora then the henrietta is glued. If the henrietta task the tyson then the henrietta blush the nora. The tyson is green.", "logic": "\nnot Task(nora, tyson)\nBeneficial(henrietta)\nTask(henrietta, tyson)\nFerocious(tyson)\nBlush(tyson, nora)\nnot Task(tyson, nora)\nTask(tyson, henrietta)\nBlush(henrietta, nora) -> Glued(henrietta)\nTask(henrietta, tyson) -> Blush(henrietta, nora)\n\nGreen(tyson)\n\nGreen(tyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The chance does not need the quincy. The nike is saintly. The nike eviscerate the quincy. The quincy is generic. The quincy gamble the chance. The quincy does not need the chance. The quincy eviscerate the nike. If the nike gamble the chance then the nike is dimorphic. If the nike eviscerate the quincy then the nike gamble the chance. The chance does not see the chance.", "logic": "\nnot Eviscerate(chance, quincy)\nSaintly(nike)\nEviscerate(nike, quincy)\nGeneric(quincy)\nGamble(quincy, chance)\nnot Eviscerate(quincy, chance)\nEviscerate(quincy, nike)\nGamble(nike, chance) -> Dimorphic(nike)\nEviscerate(nike, quincy) -> Gamble(nike, chance)\n\nnot Sees(chance, chance)\n\nnot Sees(chance, chance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The august does not need the bethany. The karlotte is bonnie. The karlotte etherize the bethany. The bethany is irenic. The bethany wreathe the august. The bethany does not need the august. The bethany etherize the karlotte. If the karlotte wreathe the august then the karlotte is sauteed. If the karlotte etherize the bethany then the karlotte wreathe the august. The august is big.", "logic": "\nnot Etherize(august, bethany)\nBonnie(karlotte)\nEtherize(karlotte, bethany)\nIrenic(bethany)\nWreathe(bethany, august)\nnot Etherize(bethany, august)\nEtherize(bethany, karlotte)\nWreathe(karlotte, august) -> Sauteed(karlotte)\nEtherize(karlotte, bethany) -> Wreathe(karlotte, august)\n\nBig(august)\n\nBig(august) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The merv does not need the tiff. The naoma is dissonant. The naoma abuse the tiff. The tiff is incident. The tiff chequer the merv. The tiff does not need the merv. The tiff abuse the naoma. If the naoma chequer the merv then the naoma is posterior. If the naoma abuse the tiff then the naoma chequer the merv. The naoma does not see the merv.", "logic": "\nnot Abuse(merv, tiff)\nDissonant(naoma)\nAbuse(naoma, tiff)\nIncident(tiff)\nChequer(tiff, merv)\nnot Abuse(tiff, merv)\nAbuse(tiff, naoma)\nChequer(naoma, merv) -> Posterior(naoma)\nAbuse(naoma, tiff) -> Chequer(naoma, merv)\n\nnot Sees(naoma, merv)\n\nnot Sees(naoma, merv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "The fletch does not need the madelin. The phaedra is rainless. The phaedra stet the madelin. The madelin is isogonic. The madelin truck the fletch. The madelin does not need the fletch. The madelin stet the phaedra. If the phaedra truck the fletch then the phaedra is blowy. If the phaedra stet the madelin then the phaedra truck the fletch. The phaedra truck the madelin.", "logic": "\nnot Stet(fletch, madelin)\nRainless(phaedra)\nStet(phaedra, madelin)\nIsogonic(madelin)\nTruck(madelin, fletch)\nnot Stet(madelin, fletch)\nStet(madelin, phaedra)\nTruck(phaedra, fletch) -> Blowy(phaedra)\nStet(phaedra, madelin) -> Truck(phaedra, fletch)\n\nTruck(phaedra, madelin)\n\nTruck(phaedra, madelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1748"} {"premises": "Ashlee is well. Ashlee is outdoorsy. Ashlee is amendatory. Ashlee is semidark. Kalli is outdoorsy. Kalli is semidark. Norwood is bilabiate. Norwood is sevenfold. Norwood is semidark. Miguelita is well. Miguelita is sevenfold. Miguelita is outdoorsy. If something is sevenfold and semidark then it is amendatory. All amendatory, semidark things are nodulose. Ashlee is outdoorsy.", "logic": "\nWell(ashlee)\nOutdoorsy(ashlee)\nAmendatory(ashlee)\nSemidark(ashlee)\nOutdoorsy(kalli)\nSemidark(kalli)\nBilabiate(norwood)\nSevenfold(norwood)\nSemidark(norwood)\nWell(miguelita)\nSevenfold(miguelita)\nOutdoorsy(miguelita)\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) and Semidark(x) -> Amendatory(x))\nforall x (Amendatory(x) and Semidark(x) -> Nodulose(x))\n\nOutdoorsy(ashlee)\n\ntherefore Outdoorsy(ashlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Leeanne is modernised. Leeanne is yeastlike. Leeanne is ripened. Leeanne is worthy. Cooper is yeastlike. Cooper is worthy. Nelsen is unimposing. Nelsen is destitute. Nelsen is worthy. Julita is modernised. Julita is destitute. Julita is yeastlike. If something is destitute and worthy then it is ripened. All ripened, worthy things are perirhinal. Julita is not yeastlike.", "logic": "\nModernised(leeanne)\nYeastlike(leeanne)\nRipened(leeanne)\nWorthy(leeanne)\nYeastlike(cooper)\nWorthy(cooper)\nUnimposing(nelsen)\nDestitute(nelsen)\nWorthy(nelsen)\nModernised(julita)\nDestitute(julita)\nYeastlike(julita)\nforall x (Destitute(x) and Worthy(x) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) and Worthy(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\n\nnot Yeastlike(julita)\n\ntherefore Yeastlike(julita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Wilow is gluteal. Wilow is anaplastic. Wilow is endermic. Wilow is mutualist. Cheri is anaplastic. Cheri is mutualist. Abdul is umbrella. Abdul is sheeplike. Abdul is mutualist. Philippe is gluteal. Philippe is sheeplike. Philippe is anaplastic. If something is sheeplike and mutualist then it is endermic. All endermic, mutualist things are perforated. Abdul is endermic.", "logic": "\nGluteal(wilow)\nAnaplastic(wilow)\nEndermic(wilow)\nMutualist(wilow)\nAnaplastic(cheri)\nMutualist(cheri)\nUmbrella(abdul)\nSheeplike(abdul)\nMutualist(abdul)\nGluteal(philippe)\nSheeplike(philippe)\nAnaplastic(philippe)\nforall x (Sheeplike(x) and Mutualist(x) -> Endermic(x))\nforall x (Endermic(x) and Mutualist(x) -> Perforated(x))\n\nEndermic(abdul)\n\nSheeplike(abdul) and Mutualist(abdul) and forall x (Sheeplike(x) and Mutualist(x) -> Endermic(x)) -> therefore Endermic(abdul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Sib is crownless. Sib is hypnotized. Sib is starboard. Sib is nonsense. Susie is hypnotized. Susie is nonsense. Mallorie is jeering. Mallorie is pardonable. Mallorie is nonsense. Che is crownless. Che is pardonable. Che is hypnotized. If something is pardonable and nonsense then it is starboard. All starboard, nonsense things are clxxv. Mallorie is not starboard.", "logic": "\nCrownless(sib)\nHypnotized(sib)\nStarboard(sib)\nNonsense(sib)\nHypnotized(susie)\nNonsense(susie)\nJeering(mallorie)\nPardonable(mallorie)\nNonsense(mallorie)\nCrownless(che)\nPardonable(che)\nHypnotized(che)\nforall x (Pardonable(x) and Nonsense(x) -> Starboard(x))\nforall x (Starboard(x) and Nonsense(x) -> Clxxv(x))\n\nnot Starboard(mallorie)\n\nPardonable(mallorie) and Nonsense(mallorie) and forall x (Pardonable(x) and Nonsense(x) -> Starboard(x)) -> therefore Starboard(mallorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Griff is rabbinical. Griff is admirable. Griff is homoerotic. Griff is yellowed. Mae is admirable. Mae is yellowed. Lilith is interlaced. Lilith is interim. Lilith is yellowed. Susannah is rabbinical. Susannah is interim. Susannah is admirable. If something is interim and yellowed then it is homoerotic. All homoerotic, yellowed things are voluptuous. Lilith is voluptuous.", "logic": "\nRabbinical(griff)\nAdmirable(griff)\nHomoerotic(griff)\nYellowed(griff)\nAdmirable(mae)\nYellowed(mae)\nInterlaced(lilith)\nInterim(lilith)\nYellowed(lilith)\nRabbinical(susannah)\nInterim(susannah)\nAdmirable(susannah)\nforall x (Interim(x) and Yellowed(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Homoerotic(x) and Yellowed(x) -> Voluptuous(x))\n\nVoluptuous(lilith)\n\nInterim(lilith) and Yellowed(lilith) and forall x (Interim(x) and Yellowed(x) -> Homoerotic(x)) -> therefore Homoerotic(lilith) Homoerotic(lilith) and Yellowed(lilith) and forall x (Homoerotic(x) and Yellowed(x) -> Voluptuous(x)) -> therefore Voluptuous(lilith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Joel is dread. Joel is untempered. Joel is antennal. Joel is delicate. Siana is untempered. Siana is delicate. Kettie is notable. Kettie is gaseous. Kettie is delicate. Revkah is dread. Revkah is gaseous. Revkah is untempered. If something is gaseous and delicate then it is antennal. All antennal, delicate things are pebbly. Kettie is not pebbly.", "logic": "\nDread(joel)\nUntempered(joel)\nAntennal(joel)\nDelicate(joel)\nUntempered(siana)\nDelicate(siana)\nNotable(kettie)\nGaseous(kettie)\nDelicate(kettie)\nDread(revkah)\nGaseous(revkah)\nUntempered(revkah)\nforall x (Gaseous(x) and Delicate(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Antennal(x) and Delicate(x) -> Pebbly(x))\n\nnot Pebbly(kettie)\n\nGaseous(kettie) and Delicate(kettie) and forall x (Gaseous(x) and Delicate(x) -> Antennal(x)) -> therefore Antennal(kettie) Antennal(kettie) and Delicate(kettie) and forall x (Antennal(x) and Delicate(x) -> Pebbly(x)) -> therefore Pebbly(kettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Marianne is liberian. Marianne is cervine. Marianne is eightieth. Marianne is nocturnal. Kristina is cervine. Kristina is nocturnal. Benjie is unbranched. Benjie is foul. Benjie is nocturnal. Shoshie is liberian. Shoshie is foul. Shoshie is cervine. If something is foul and nocturnal then it is eightieth. All eightieth, nocturnal things are degenerate. Shoshie is not degenerate.", "logic": "\nLiberian(marianne)\nCervine(marianne)\nEightieth(marianne)\nNocturnal(marianne)\nCervine(kristina)\nNocturnal(kristina)\nUnbranched(benjie)\nFoul(benjie)\nNocturnal(benjie)\nLiberian(shoshie)\nFoul(shoshie)\nCervine(shoshie)\nforall x (Foul(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> Eightieth(x))\nforall x (Eightieth(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> Degenerate(x))\n\nnot Degenerate(shoshie)\n\nforall x (Eightieth(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> Degenerate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Jacques is multicolor. Jacques is ulcerous. Jacques is committed. Jacques is propulsive. Kat is ulcerous. Kat is propulsive. Torrie is exchanged. Torrie is crosswise. Torrie is propulsive. Nathaniel is multicolor. Nathaniel is crosswise. Nathaniel is ulcerous. If something is crosswise and propulsive then it is committed. All committed, propulsive things are arrayed. Kat is committed.", "logic": "\nMulticolor(jacques)\nUlcerous(jacques)\nCommitted(jacques)\nPropulsive(jacques)\nUlcerous(kat)\nPropulsive(kat)\nExchanged(torrie)\nCrosswise(torrie)\nPropulsive(torrie)\nMulticolor(nathaniel)\nCrosswise(nathaniel)\nUlcerous(nathaniel)\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and Propulsive(x) -> Committed(x))\nforall x (Committed(x) and Propulsive(x) -> Arrayed(x))\n\nCommitted(kat)\n\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and Propulsive(x) -> Committed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Clayborne is qatari. Clayborne is polynesian. Clayborne is clueless. Clayborne is lowborn. Nicholle is polynesian. Nicholle is lowborn. Mack is domed. Mack is unheeding. Mack is lowborn. Lina is qatari. Lina is unheeding. Lina is polynesian. If something is unheeding and lowborn then it is clueless. All clueless, lowborn things are obtainable. Nicholle is not obtainable.", "logic": "\nQatari(clayborne)\nPolynesian(clayborne)\nClueless(clayborne)\nLowborn(clayborne)\nPolynesian(nicholle)\nLowborn(nicholle)\nDomed(mack)\nUnheeding(mack)\nLowborn(mack)\nQatari(lina)\nUnheeding(lina)\nPolynesian(lina)\nforall x (Unheeding(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Clueless(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Obtainable(x))\n\nnot Obtainable(nicholle)\n\nforall x (Clueless(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Obtainable(x)) <- forall x (Unheeding(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Clueless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Bernice is animal. Bernice is cercarial. Bernice is actuating. Bernice is blate. Lenora is cercarial. Lenora is blate. Janessa is extralegal. Janessa is areolate. Janessa is blate. Flynn is animal. Flynn is areolate. Flynn is cercarial. If something is areolate and blate then it is actuating. All actuating, blate things are lxxiv. Bernice is extralegal.", "logic": "\nAnimal(bernice)\nCercarial(bernice)\nActuating(bernice)\nBlate(bernice)\nCercarial(lenora)\nBlate(lenora)\nExtralegal(janessa)\nAreolate(janessa)\nBlate(janessa)\nAnimal(flynn)\nAreolate(flynn)\nCercarial(flynn)\nforall x (Areolate(x) and Blate(x) -> Actuating(x))\nforall x (Actuating(x) and Blate(x) -> Lxxiv(x))\n\nExtralegal(bernice)\n\nExtralegal(bernice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Stevie is sixteenth. Stevie is chitinous. Stevie is antarctic. Stevie is assumed. Aigneis is chitinous. Aigneis is assumed. Cecilla is inviting. Cecilla is votive. Cecilla is assumed. Eveleen is sixteenth. Eveleen is votive. Eveleen is chitinous. If something is votive and assumed then it is antarctic. All antarctic, assumed things are northbound. Aigneis is not sixteenth.", "logic": "\nSixteenth(stevie)\nChitinous(stevie)\nAntarctic(stevie)\nAssumed(stevie)\nChitinous(aigneis)\nAssumed(aigneis)\nInviting(cecilla)\nVotive(cecilla)\nAssumed(cecilla)\nSixteenth(eveleen)\nVotive(eveleen)\nChitinous(eveleen)\nforall x (Votive(x) and Assumed(x) -> Antarctic(x))\nforall x (Antarctic(x) and Assumed(x) -> Northbound(x))\n\nnot Sixteenth(aigneis)\n\nnot Sixteenth(aigneis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "Erl is erose. Erl is cognisable. Erl is starved. Erl is cursorial. Salem is cognisable. Salem is cursorial. Goddard is uncapped. Goddard is third. Goddard is cursorial. Virgina is erose. Virgina is third. Virgina is cognisable. If something is third and cursorial then it is starved. All starved, cursorial things are baptistic. Salem is uncapped.", "logic": "\nErose(erl)\nCognisable(erl)\nStarved(erl)\nCursorial(erl)\nCognisable(salem)\nCursorial(salem)\nUncapped(goddard)\nThird(goddard)\nCursorial(goddard)\nErose(virgina)\nThird(virgina)\nCognisable(virgina)\nforall x (Third(x) and Cursorial(x) -> Starved(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) and Cursorial(x) -> Baptistic(x))\n\nUncapped(salem)\n\nUncapped(salem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-123"} {"premises": "The claire versify the stephen. The stephen export the claire. The vernon versify the claire. If something is overall then it export the stephen. If something versify the claire then it does not chase the claire. If something versify the claire and it does not visit the vernon then the claire diabolize the stephen. If something export the claire then it versify the claire. If the stephen is hepatic then the stephen diabolize the vernon. If something versify the stephen then the stephen versify the claire. The stephen export the claire.", "logic": "\nVersify(claire, stephen)\nExport(stephen, claire)\nVersify(vernon, claire)\nforall x (Overall(x) -> Export(x, stephen))\nforall x (Versify(x, claire) -> not Diabolize(x, claire))\nforall x (Versify(x, claire) and not Export(x, vernon) -> Diabolize(claire, stephen))\nforall x (Export(x, claire) -> Versify(x, claire))\nHepatic(stephen) -> Diabolize(stephen, vernon)\nforall x (Versify(x, stephen) -> Versify(stephen, claire))\n\nExport(stephen, claire)\n\ntherefore Export(stephen, claire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The selma unreel the cory. The cory manure the selma. The ileane unreel the selma. If something is queasy then it manure the cory. If something unreel the selma then it does not chase the selma. If something unreel the selma and it does not visit the ileane then the selma glitter the cory. If something manure the selma then it unreel the selma. If the cory is profligate then the cory glitter the ileane. If something unreel the cory then the cory unreel the selma. The selma does not eat the cory.", "logic": "\nUnreel(selma, cory)\nManure(cory, selma)\nUnreel(ileane, selma)\nforall x (Queasy(x) -> Manure(x, cory))\nforall x (Unreel(x, selma) -> not Glitter(x, selma))\nforall x (Unreel(x, selma) and not Manure(x, ileane) -> Glitter(selma, cory))\nforall x (Manure(x, selma) -> Unreel(x, selma))\nProfligate(cory) -> Glitter(cory, ileane)\nforall x (Unreel(x, cory) -> Unreel(cory, selma))\n\nnot Unreel(selma, cory)\n\ntherefore Unreel(selma, cory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The alvira intumesce the starr. The starr honeycomb the alvira. The marget intumesce the alvira. If something is cliquish then it honeycomb the starr. If something intumesce the alvira then it does not chase the alvira. If something intumesce the alvira and it does not visit the marget then the alvira abbreviate the starr. If something honeycomb the alvira then it intumesce the alvira. If the starr is xxvii then the starr abbreviate the marget. If something intumesce the starr then the starr intumesce the alvira. The starr intumesce the alvira.", "logic": "\nIntumesce(alvira, starr)\nHoneycomb(starr, alvira)\nIntumesce(marget, alvira)\nforall x (Cliquish(x) -> Honeycomb(x, starr))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, alvira) -> not Abbreviate(x, alvira))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, alvira) and not Honeycomb(x, marget) -> Abbreviate(alvira, starr))\nforall x (Honeycomb(x, alvira) -> Intumesce(x, alvira))\nXxvii(starr) -> Abbreviate(starr, marget)\nforall x (Intumesce(x, starr) -> Intumesce(starr, alvira))\n\nIntumesce(starr, alvira)\n\nIntumesce(alvira, starr) and forall x (Intumesce(x, starr) -> Intumesce(starr, alvira)) -> therefore Intumesce(starr, alvira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The cheslie somersault the olin. The olin grunt the cheslie. The allan somersault the cheslie. If something is sinuate then it grunt the olin. If something somersault the cheslie then it does not chase the cheslie. If something somersault the cheslie and it does not visit the allan then the cheslie slalom the olin. If something grunt the cheslie then it somersault the cheslie. If the olin is shamanist then the olin slalom the allan. If something somersault the olin then the olin somersault the cheslie. The olin does not eat the cheslie.", "logic": "\nSomersault(cheslie, olin)\nGrunt(olin, cheslie)\nSomersault(allan, cheslie)\nforall x (Sinuate(x) -> Grunt(x, olin))\nforall x (Somersault(x, cheslie) -> not Slalom(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Somersault(x, cheslie) and not Grunt(x, allan) -> Slalom(cheslie, olin))\nforall x (Grunt(x, cheslie) -> Somersault(x, cheslie))\nShamanist(olin) -> Slalom(olin, allan)\nforall x (Somersault(x, olin) -> Somersault(olin, cheslie))\n\nnot Somersault(olin, cheslie)\n\nSomersault(cheslie, olin) and forall x (Somersault(x, olin) -> Somersault(olin, cheslie)) -> therefore Somersault(olin, cheslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The reta slurp the roseann. The roseann roleplay the reta. The jermain slurp the reta. If something is jumentous then it roleplay the roseann. If something slurp the reta then it does not chase the reta. If something slurp the reta and it does not visit the jermain then the reta tense the roseann. If something roleplay the reta then it slurp the reta. If the roseann is desired then the roseann tense the jermain. If something slurp the roseann then the roseann slurp the reta. The roseann does not chase the reta.", "logic": "\nSlurp(reta, roseann)\nRoleplay(roseann, reta)\nSlurp(jermain, reta)\nforall x (Jumentous(x) -> Roleplay(x, roseann))\nforall x (Slurp(x, reta) -> not Tense(x, reta))\nforall x (Slurp(x, reta) and not Roleplay(x, jermain) -> Tense(reta, roseann))\nforall x (Roleplay(x, reta) -> Slurp(x, reta))\nDesired(roseann) -> Tense(roseann, jermain)\nforall x (Slurp(x, roseann) -> Slurp(roseann, reta))\n\nnot Tense(roseann, reta)\n\nSlurp(reta, roseann) and forall x (Slurp(x, roseann) -> Slurp(roseann, reta)) -> therefore Slurp(roseann, reta) Slurp(roseann, reta) and forall x (Slurp(x, reta) -> not Tense(x, reta)) -> therefore not Tense(roseann, reta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The siobhan civilise the magdalena. The magdalena ptyalise the siobhan. The trescha civilise the siobhan. If something is refined then it ptyalise the magdalena. If something civilise the siobhan then it does not chase the siobhan. If something civilise the siobhan and it does not visit the trescha then the siobhan supplement the magdalena. If something ptyalise the siobhan then it civilise the siobhan. If the magdalena is corinthian then the magdalena supplement the trescha. If something civilise the magdalena then the magdalena civilise the siobhan. The magdalena supplement the siobhan.", "logic": "\nCivilise(siobhan, magdalena)\nPtyalise(magdalena, siobhan)\nCivilise(trescha, siobhan)\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Ptyalise(x, magdalena))\nforall x (Civilise(x, siobhan) -> not Supplement(x, siobhan))\nforall x (Civilise(x, siobhan) and not Ptyalise(x, trescha) -> Supplement(siobhan, magdalena))\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, siobhan) -> Civilise(x, siobhan))\nCorinthian(magdalena) -> Supplement(magdalena, trescha)\nforall x (Civilise(x, magdalena) -> Civilise(magdalena, siobhan))\n\nSupplement(magdalena, siobhan)\n\nCivilise(siobhan, magdalena) and forall x (Civilise(x, magdalena) -> Civilise(magdalena, siobhan)) -> therefore Civilise(magdalena, siobhan) Civilise(magdalena, siobhan) and forall x (Civilise(x, siobhan) -> not Supplement(x, siobhan)) -> therefore not Supplement(magdalena, siobhan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The blanca fright the jed. The jed devolve the blanca. The antonius fright the blanca. If something is tenacious then it devolve the jed. If something fright the blanca then it does not chase the blanca. If something fright the blanca and it does not visit the antonius then the blanca clothe the jed. If something devolve the blanca then it fright the blanca. If the jed is fledged then the jed clothe the antonius. If something fright the jed then the jed fright the blanca. The jed does not visit the jed.", "logic": "\nFright(blanca, jed)\nDevolve(jed, blanca)\nFright(antonius, blanca)\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Devolve(x, jed))\nforall x (Fright(x, blanca) -> not Clothe(x, blanca))\nforall x (Fright(x, blanca) and not Devolve(x, antonius) -> Clothe(blanca, jed))\nforall x (Devolve(x, blanca) -> Fright(x, blanca))\nFledged(jed) -> Clothe(jed, antonius)\nforall x (Fright(x, jed) -> Fright(jed, blanca))\n\nnot Devolve(jed, jed)\n\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Devolve(x, jed)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The truda fragment the stanislaw. The stanislaw levy the truda. The melessa fragment the truda. If something is vulpecular then it levy the stanislaw. If something fragment the truda then it does not chase the truda. If something fragment the truda and it does not visit the melessa then the truda shlep the stanislaw. If something levy the truda then it fragment the truda. If the stanislaw is supernal then the stanislaw shlep the melessa. If something fragment the stanislaw then the stanislaw fragment the truda. The melessa levy the stanislaw.", "logic": "\nFragment(truda, stanislaw)\nLevy(stanislaw, truda)\nFragment(melessa, truda)\nforall x (Vulpecular(x) -> Levy(x, stanislaw))\nforall x (Fragment(x, truda) -> not Shlep(x, truda))\nforall x (Fragment(x, truda) and not Levy(x, melessa) -> Shlep(truda, stanislaw))\nforall x (Levy(x, truda) -> Fragment(x, truda))\nSupernal(stanislaw) -> Shlep(stanislaw, melessa)\nforall x (Fragment(x, stanislaw) -> Fragment(stanislaw, truda))\n\nLevy(melessa, stanislaw)\n\nforall x (Vulpecular(x) -> Levy(x, stanislaw)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The rheba abdicate the bernice. The bernice gleam the rheba. The carlynn abdicate the rheba. If something is thrombosed then it gleam the bernice. If something abdicate the rheba then it does not chase the rheba. If something abdicate the rheba and it does not visit the carlynn then the rheba stonewash the bernice. If something gleam the rheba then it abdicate the rheba. If the bernice is collect then the bernice stonewash the carlynn. If something abdicate the bernice then the bernice abdicate the rheba. The rheba does not eat the rheba.", "logic": "\nAbdicate(rheba, bernice)\nGleam(bernice, rheba)\nAbdicate(carlynn, rheba)\nforall x (Thrombosed(x) -> Gleam(x, bernice))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, rheba) -> not Stonewash(x, rheba))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, rheba) and not Gleam(x, carlynn) -> Stonewash(rheba, bernice))\nforall x (Gleam(x, rheba) -> Abdicate(x, rheba))\nCollect(bernice) -> Stonewash(bernice, carlynn)\nforall x (Abdicate(x, bernice) -> Abdicate(bernice, rheba))\n\nnot Abdicate(rheba, rheba)\n\nforall x (Gleam(x, rheba) -> Abdicate(x, rheba)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The sylvie evert the verena. The verena balance the sylvie. The clarke evert the sylvie. If something is placable then it balance the verena. If something evert the sylvie then it does not chase the sylvie. If something evert the sylvie and it does not visit the clarke then the sylvie opalise the verena. If something balance the sylvie then it evert the sylvie. If the verena is candent then the verena opalise the clarke. If something evert the verena then the verena evert the sylvie. The sylvie evert the clarke.", "logic": "\nEvert(sylvie, verena)\nBalance(verena, sylvie)\nEvert(clarke, sylvie)\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Balance(x, verena))\nforall x (Evert(x, sylvie) -> not Opalise(x, sylvie))\nforall x (Evert(x, sylvie) and not Balance(x, clarke) -> Opalise(sylvie, verena))\nforall x (Balance(x, sylvie) -> Evert(x, sylvie))\nCandent(verena) -> Opalise(verena, clarke)\nforall x (Evert(x, verena) -> Evert(verena, sylvie))\n\nEvert(sylvie, clarke)\n\nEvert(sylvie, clarke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The ninon acuminate the fancie. The fancie unchurch the ninon. The krista acuminate the ninon. If something is political then it unchurch the fancie. If something acuminate the ninon then it does not chase the ninon. If something acuminate the ninon and it does not visit the krista then the ninon unwire the fancie. If something unchurch the ninon then it acuminate the ninon. If the fancie is vicinal then the fancie unwire the krista. If something acuminate the fancie then the fancie acuminate the ninon. The ninon is not young.", "logic": "\nAcuminate(ninon, fancie)\nUnchurch(fancie, ninon)\nAcuminate(krista, ninon)\nforall x (Political(x) -> Unchurch(x, fancie))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, ninon) -> not Unwire(x, ninon))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, ninon) and not Unchurch(x, krista) -> Unwire(ninon, fancie))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, ninon) -> Acuminate(x, ninon))\nVicinal(fancie) -> Unwire(fancie, krista)\nforall x (Acuminate(x, fancie) -> Acuminate(fancie, ninon))\n\nnot Young(ninon)\n\nnot Young(ninon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The samuela take the yule. The yule salt the samuela. The clarke take the samuela. If something is nativist then it salt the yule. If something take the samuela then it does not chase the samuela. If something take the samuela and it does not visit the clarke then the samuela refracture the yule. If something salt the samuela then it take the samuela. If the yule is stoneless then the yule refracture the clarke. If something take the yule then the yule take the samuela. The yule is young.", "logic": "\nTake(samuela, yule)\nSalt(yule, samuela)\nTake(clarke, samuela)\nforall x (Nativist(x) -> Salt(x, yule))\nforall x (Take(x, samuela) -> not Refracture(x, samuela))\nforall x (Take(x, samuela) and not Salt(x, clarke) -> Refracture(samuela, yule))\nforall x (Salt(x, samuela) -> Take(x, samuela))\nStoneless(yule) -> Refracture(yule, clarke)\nforall x (Take(x, yule) -> Take(yule, samuela))\n\nYoung(yule)\n\nYoung(yule) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1709"} {"premises": "The marsiella is defiled. If someone is grateful and stifled then they are not defiled. Nice, uncapped people are not defiled. If someone is grateful and defiled then they are hilly. All defiled, grateful people are not uncapped. If someone is uncapped and defiled then they are stifled. If someone is defiled then they are stifled. If the marsiella is stifled then the marsiella is uncapped. If someone is defiled and hilly then they are grateful. The marsiella is defiled.", "logic": "\nDefiled(marsiella)\nforall x (Grateful(x) and Stifled(x) -> not Defiled(x))\nforall x (Hilly(x) and Uncapped(x) -> not Defiled(x))\nforall x (Grateful(x) and Defiled(x) -> Hilly(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Grateful(x) -> not Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Uncapped(x) and Defiled(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) -> Stifled(x))\nStifled(marsiella) -> Uncapped(marsiella)\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Hilly(x) -> Grateful(x))\n\nDefiled(marsiella)\n\ntherefore Defiled(marsiella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The ricki is splendid. If someone is lilac and convergent then they are not splendid. Nice, archeozoic people are not splendid. If someone is lilac and splendid then they are handsome. All splendid, lilac people are not archeozoic. If someone is archeozoic and splendid then they are convergent. If someone is splendid then they are convergent. If the ricki is convergent then the ricki is archeozoic. If someone is splendid and handsome then they are lilac. The ricki is not splendid.", "logic": "\nSplendid(ricki)\nforall x (Lilac(x) and Convergent(x) -> not Splendid(x))\nforall x (Handsome(x) and Archeozoic(x) -> not Splendid(x))\nforall x (Lilac(x) and Splendid(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Splendid(x) and Lilac(x) -> not Archeozoic(x))\nforall x (Archeozoic(x) and Splendid(x) -> Convergent(x))\nforall x (Splendid(x) -> Convergent(x))\nConvergent(ricki) -> Archeozoic(ricki)\nforall x (Splendid(x) and Handsome(x) -> Lilac(x))\n\nnot Splendid(ricki)\n\ntherefore Splendid(ricki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The gerrard is unbuttoned. If someone is bondable and numberless then they are not unbuttoned. Nice, fluffy people are not unbuttoned. If someone is bondable and unbuttoned then they are defiled. All unbuttoned, bondable people are not fluffy. If someone is fluffy and unbuttoned then they are numberless. If someone is unbuttoned then they are numberless. If the gerrard is numberless then the gerrard is fluffy. If someone is unbuttoned and defiled then they are bondable. The gerrard is numberless.", "logic": "\nUnbuttoned(gerrard)\nforall x (Bondable(x) and Numberless(x) -> not Unbuttoned(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Fluffy(x) -> not Unbuttoned(x))\nforall x (Bondable(x) and Unbuttoned(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Unbuttoned(x) and Bondable(x) -> not Fluffy(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) and Unbuttoned(x) -> Numberless(x))\nforall x (Unbuttoned(x) -> Numberless(x))\nNumberless(gerrard) -> Fluffy(gerrard)\nforall x (Unbuttoned(x) and Defiled(x) -> Bondable(x))\n\nNumberless(gerrard)\n\nUnbuttoned(gerrard) and forall x (Unbuttoned(x) -> Numberless(x)) -> therefore Numberless(gerrard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The damon is subnormal. If someone is tailored and hatless then they are not subnormal. Nice, triple people are not subnormal. If someone is tailored and subnormal then they are lossless. All subnormal, tailored people are not triple. If someone is triple and subnormal then they are hatless. If someone is subnormal then they are hatless. If the damon is hatless then the damon is triple. If someone is subnormal and lossless then they are tailored. The damon is not hatless.", "logic": "\nSubnormal(damon)\nforall x (Tailored(x) and Hatless(x) -> not Subnormal(x))\nforall x (Lossless(x) and Triple(x) -> not Subnormal(x))\nforall x (Tailored(x) and Subnormal(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) and Tailored(x) -> not Triple(x))\nforall x (Triple(x) and Subnormal(x) -> Hatless(x))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) -> Hatless(x))\nHatless(damon) -> Triple(damon)\nforall x (Subnormal(x) and Lossless(x) -> Tailored(x))\n\nnot Hatless(damon)\n\nSubnormal(damon) and forall x (Subnormal(x) -> Hatless(x)) -> therefore Hatless(damon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The zebedee is absorbing. If someone is continuant and freshman then they are not absorbing. Nice, sinful people are not absorbing. If someone is continuant and absorbing then they are greater. All absorbing, continuant people are not sinful. If someone is sinful and absorbing then they are freshman. If someone is absorbing then they are freshman. If the zebedee is freshman then the zebedee is sinful. If someone is absorbing and greater then they are continuant. The zebedee is sinful.", "logic": "\nAbsorbing(zebedee)\nforall x (Continuant(x) and Freshman(x) -> not Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Greater(x) and Sinful(x) -> not Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) and Absorbing(x) -> Greater(x))\nforall x (Absorbing(x) and Continuant(x) -> not Sinful(x))\nforall x (Sinful(x) and Absorbing(x) -> Freshman(x))\nforall x (Absorbing(x) -> Freshman(x))\nFreshman(zebedee) -> Sinful(zebedee)\nforall x (Absorbing(x) and Greater(x) -> Continuant(x))\n\nSinful(zebedee)\n\nAbsorbing(zebedee) and forall x (Absorbing(x) -> Freshman(x)) -> therefore Freshman(zebedee) Freshman(zebedee) and Freshman(zebedee) -> Sinful(zebedee) -> therefore Sinful(zebedee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The alvin is despotical. If someone is calcitic and enforced then they are not despotical. Nice, anaplastic people are not despotical. If someone is calcitic and despotical then they are difficult. All despotical, calcitic people are not anaplastic. If someone is anaplastic and despotical then they are enforced. If someone is despotical then they are enforced. If the alvin is enforced then the alvin is anaplastic. If someone is despotical and difficult then they are calcitic. The alvin is not anaplastic.", "logic": "\nDespotical(alvin)\nforall x (Calcitic(x) and Enforced(x) -> not Despotical(x))\nforall x (Difficult(x) and Anaplastic(x) -> not Despotical(x))\nforall x (Calcitic(x) and Despotical(x) -> Difficult(x))\nforall x (Despotical(x) and Calcitic(x) -> not Anaplastic(x))\nforall x (Anaplastic(x) and Despotical(x) -> Enforced(x))\nforall x (Despotical(x) -> Enforced(x))\nEnforced(alvin) -> Anaplastic(alvin)\nforall x (Despotical(x) and Difficult(x) -> Calcitic(x))\n\nnot Anaplastic(alvin)\n\nDespotical(alvin) and forall x (Despotical(x) -> Enforced(x)) -> therefore Enforced(alvin) Enforced(alvin) and Enforced(alvin) -> Anaplastic(alvin) -> therefore Anaplastic(alvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The gilligan is ionized. If someone is mesmerised and modal then they are not ionized. Nice, bigeminal people are not ionized. If someone is mesmerised and ionized then they are spineless. All ionized, mesmerised people are not bigeminal. If someone is bigeminal and ionized then they are modal. If someone is ionized then they are modal. If the gilligan is modal then the gilligan is bigeminal. If someone is ionized and spineless then they are mesmerised. The gilligan is not spineless.", "logic": "\nIonized(gilligan)\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and Modal(x) -> not Ionized(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) and Bigeminal(x) -> not Ionized(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and Ionized(x) -> Spineless(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) and Mesmerised(x) -> not Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Bigeminal(x) and Ionized(x) -> Modal(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Modal(x))\nModal(gilligan) -> Bigeminal(gilligan)\nforall x (Ionized(x) and Spineless(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\n\nnot Spineless(gilligan)\n\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and Ionized(x) -> Spineless(x)) <- forall x (Ionized(x) and Spineless(x) -> Mesmerised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The charlean is weedy. If someone is twisted and truncate then they are not weedy. Nice, complex people are not weedy. If someone is twisted and weedy then they are tonic. All weedy, twisted people are not complex. If someone is complex and weedy then they are truncate. If someone is weedy then they are truncate. If the charlean is truncate then the charlean is complex. If someone is weedy and tonic then they are twisted. The charlean is twisted.", "logic": "\nWeedy(charlean)\nforall x (Twisted(x) and Truncate(x) -> not Weedy(x))\nforall x (Tonic(x) and Complex(x) -> not Weedy(x))\nforall x (Twisted(x) and Weedy(x) -> Tonic(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Twisted(x) -> not Complex(x))\nforall x (Complex(x) and Weedy(x) -> Truncate(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) -> Truncate(x))\nTruncate(charlean) -> Complex(charlean)\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Tonic(x) -> Twisted(x))\n\nTwisted(charlean)\n\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Tonic(x) -> Twisted(x)) <- forall x (Twisted(x) and Weedy(x) -> Tonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The sunny is agitated. If someone is warped and pictured then they are not agitated. Nice, innovative people are not agitated. If someone is warped and agitated then they are mercurial. All agitated, warped people are not innovative. If someone is innovative and agitated then they are pictured. If someone is agitated then they are pictured. If the sunny is pictured then the sunny is innovative. If someone is agitated and mercurial then they are warped. The sunny does not see the sunny.", "logic": "\nAgitated(sunny)\nforall x (Warped(x) and Pictured(x) -> not Agitated(x))\nforall x (Mercurial(x) and Innovative(x) -> not Agitated(x))\nforall x (Warped(x) and Agitated(x) -> Mercurial(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) and Warped(x) -> not Innovative(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) and Agitated(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) -> Pictured(x))\nPictured(sunny) -> Innovative(sunny)\nforall x (Agitated(x) and Mercurial(x) -> Warped(x))\n\nnot Sees(sunny, sunny)\n\nnot Sees(sunny, sunny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The bryna is monoclonal. If someone is duodecimal and alated then they are not monoclonal. Nice, husky people are not monoclonal. If someone is duodecimal and monoclonal then they are monetary. All monoclonal, duodecimal people are not husky. If someone is husky and monoclonal then they are alated. If someone is monoclonal then they are alated. If the bryna is alated then the bryna is husky. If someone is monoclonal and monetary then they are duodecimal. The bryna chases the bryna.", "logic": "\nMonoclonal(bryna)\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) and Alated(x) -> not Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Monetary(x) and Husky(x) -> not Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) and Monoclonal(x) -> Monetary(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and Duodecimal(x) -> not Husky(x))\nforall x (Husky(x) and Monoclonal(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) -> Alated(x))\nAlated(bryna) -> Husky(bryna)\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and Monetary(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\n\nChases(bryna, bryna)\n\nChases(bryna, bryna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The see is not english. The see input the monika. The caitrin is passable. The caitrin is illicit. The caitrin input the see. The caitrin input the monika. The caitrin perpetrate the see. The caitrin perpetrate the monika. The caitrin sideline the see. The monika is passable. The monika is illicit. The monika is english. The monika does not need the see. The monika perpetrate the see. The monika does not see the caitrin. The monika sideline the caitrin. If the caitrin perpetrate the monika and the caitrin is not literal then the caitrin is not passable. If something perpetrate the see and the see is illicit then it perpetrate the monika. If something is coagulate and literal then it does not visit the see. If something is literal and coagulate then it does not need the monika. If something perpetrate the see and it input the monika then the see is illicit. If something is english and it does not see the monika then the monika is english. The monika does not need the see.", "logic": "\nnot English(see)\nInput(see, monika)\nPassable(caitrin)\nIllicit(caitrin)\nInput(caitrin, see)\nInput(caitrin, monika)\nPerpetrate(caitrin, see)\nPerpetrate(caitrin, monika)\nSideline(caitrin, see)\nPassable(monika)\nIllicit(monika)\nEnglish(monika)\nnot Input(monika, see)\nPerpetrate(monika, see)\nnot Perpetrate(monika, caitrin)\nSideline(monika, caitrin)\nPerpetrate(caitrin, monika) and not Literal(caitrin) -> not Passable(caitrin)\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, see) and Illicit(see) -> Perpetrate(x, monika))\nforall x (Coagulate(x) and Literal(x) -> not Sideline(x, see))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Coagulate(x) -> not Input(x, monika))\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, see) and Input(x, monika) -> Illicit(see))\nforall x (English(x) and not Perpetrate(x, monika) -> English(monika))\n\nnot Input(monika, see)\n\ntherefore not Input(monika, see)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The ali is not continent. The ali fireproof the joela. The hodge is sabine. The hodge is myelic. The hodge fireproof the ali. The hodge fireproof the joela. The hodge miscarry the ali. The hodge miscarry the joela. The hodge heckle the ali. The joela is sabine. The joela is myelic. The joela is continent. The joela does not need the ali. The joela miscarry the ali. The joela does not see the hodge. The joela heckle the hodge. If the hodge miscarry the joela and the hodge is not rank then the hodge is not sabine. If something miscarry the ali and the ali is myelic then it miscarry the joela. If something is exhausting and rank then it does not visit the ali. If something is rank and exhausting then it does not need the joela. If something miscarry the ali and it fireproof the joela then the ali is myelic. If something is continent and it does not see the joela then the joela is continent. The joela fireproof the ali.", "logic": "\nnot Continent(ali)\nFireproof(ali, joela)\nSabine(hodge)\nMyelic(hodge)\nFireproof(hodge, ali)\nFireproof(hodge, joela)\nMiscarry(hodge, ali)\nMiscarry(hodge, joela)\nHeckle(hodge, ali)\nSabine(joela)\nMyelic(joela)\nContinent(joela)\nnot Fireproof(joela, ali)\nMiscarry(joela, ali)\nnot Miscarry(joela, hodge)\nHeckle(joela, hodge)\nMiscarry(hodge, joela) and not Rank(hodge) -> not Sabine(hodge)\nforall x (Miscarry(x, ali) and Myelic(ali) -> Miscarry(x, joela))\nforall x (Exhausting(x) and Rank(x) -> not Heckle(x, ali))\nforall x (Rank(x) and Exhausting(x) -> not Fireproof(x, joela))\nforall x (Miscarry(x, ali) and Fireproof(x, joela) -> Myelic(ali))\nforall x (Continent(x) and not Miscarry(x, joela) -> Continent(joela))\n\nFireproof(joela, ali)\n\ntherefore not Fireproof(joela, ali)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The barri is not henpecked. The barri dish the charmion. The carmel is basifixed. The carmel is plundered. The carmel dish the barri. The carmel dish the charmion. The carmel comport the barri. The carmel comport the charmion. The carmel peep the barri. The charmion is basifixed. The charmion is plundered. The charmion is henpecked. The charmion does not need the barri. The charmion comport the barri. The charmion does not see the carmel. The charmion peep the carmel. If the carmel comport the charmion and the carmel is not shifting then the carmel is not basifixed. If something comport the barri and the barri is plundered then it comport the charmion. If something is largo and shifting then it does not visit the barri. If something is shifting and largo then it does not need the charmion. If something comport the barri and it dish the charmion then the barri is plundered. If something is henpecked and it does not see the charmion then the charmion is henpecked. The barri is plundered.", "logic": "\nnot Henpecked(barri)\nDish(barri, charmion)\nBasifixed(carmel)\nPlundered(carmel)\nDish(carmel, barri)\nDish(carmel, charmion)\nComport(carmel, barri)\nComport(carmel, charmion)\nPeep(carmel, barri)\nBasifixed(charmion)\nPlundered(charmion)\nHenpecked(charmion)\nnot Dish(charmion, barri)\nComport(charmion, barri)\nnot Comport(charmion, carmel)\nPeep(charmion, carmel)\nComport(carmel, charmion) and not Shifting(carmel) -> not Basifixed(carmel)\nforall x (Comport(x, barri) and Plundered(barri) -> Comport(x, charmion))\nforall x (Largo(x) and Shifting(x) -> not Peep(x, barri))\nforall x (Shifting(x) and Largo(x) -> not Dish(x, charmion))\nforall x (Comport(x, barri) and Dish(x, charmion) -> Plundered(barri))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) and not Comport(x, charmion) -> Henpecked(charmion))\n\nPlundered(barri)\n\nComport(carmel, barri) and Dish(carmel, charmion) and forall x (Comport(x, barri) and Dish(x, charmion) -> Plundered(barri)) -> therefore Plundered(barri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The kostas is not slavonic. The kostas loose the arlo. The jimmy is unstrung. The jimmy is beautiful. The jimmy loose the kostas. The jimmy loose the arlo. The jimmy undrape the kostas. The jimmy undrape the arlo. The jimmy mismate the kostas. The arlo is unstrung. The arlo is beautiful. The arlo is slavonic. The arlo does not need the kostas. The arlo undrape the kostas. The arlo does not see the jimmy. The arlo mismate the jimmy. If the jimmy undrape the arlo and the jimmy is not botuliform then the jimmy is not unstrung. If something undrape the kostas and the kostas is beautiful then it undrape the arlo. If something is kenyan and botuliform then it does not visit the kostas. If something is botuliform and kenyan then it does not need the arlo. If something undrape the kostas and it loose the arlo then the kostas is beautiful. If something is slavonic and it does not see the arlo then the arlo is slavonic. The kostas is not beautiful.", "logic": "\nnot Slavonic(kostas)\nLoose(kostas, arlo)\nUnstrung(jimmy)\nBeautiful(jimmy)\nLoose(jimmy, kostas)\nLoose(jimmy, arlo)\nUndrape(jimmy, kostas)\nUndrape(jimmy, arlo)\nMismate(jimmy, kostas)\nUnstrung(arlo)\nBeautiful(arlo)\nSlavonic(arlo)\nnot Loose(arlo, kostas)\nUndrape(arlo, kostas)\nnot Undrape(arlo, jimmy)\nMismate(arlo, jimmy)\nUndrape(jimmy, arlo) and not Botuliform(jimmy) -> not Unstrung(jimmy)\nforall x (Undrape(x, kostas) and Beautiful(kostas) -> Undrape(x, arlo))\nforall x (Kenyan(x) and Botuliform(x) -> not Mismate(x, kostas))\nforall x (Botuliform(x) and Kenyan(x) -> not Loose(x, arlo))\nforall x (Undrape(x, kostas) and Loose(x, arlo) -> Beautiful(kostas))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and not Undrape(x, arlo) -> Slavonic(arlo))\n\nnot Beautiful(kostas)\n\nUndrape(jimmy, kostas) and Loose(jimmy, arlo) and forall x (Undrape(x, kostas) and Loose(x, arlo) -> Beautiful(kostas)) -> therefore Beautiful(kostas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The clemmy is not miserable. The clemmy surcharge the robinson. The mei is pitted. The mei is clean. The mei surcharge the clemmy. The mei surcharge the robinson. The mei approve the clemmy. The mei approve the robinson. The mei devastate the clemmy. The robinson is pitted. The robinson is clean. The robinson is miserable. The robinson does not need the clemmy. The robinson approve the clemmy. The robinson does not see the mei. The robinson devastate the mei. If the mei approve the robinson and the mei is not rugged then the mei is not pitted. If something approve the clemmy and the clemmy is clean then it approve the robinson. If something is branched and rugged then it does not visit the clemmy. If something is rugged and branched then it does not need the robinson. If something approve the clemmy and it surcharge the robinson then the clemmy is clean. If something is miserable and it does not see the robinson then the robinson is miserable. The robinson approve the robinson.", "logic": "\nnot Miserable(clemmy)\nSurcharge(clemmy, robinson)\nPitted(mei)\nClean(mei)\nSurcharge(mei, clemmy)\nSurcharge(mei, robinson)\nApprove(mei, clemmy)\nApprove(mei, robinson)\nDevastate(mei, clemmy)\nPitted(robinson)\nClean(robinson)\nMiserable(robinson)\nnot Surcharge(robinson, clemmy)\nApprove(robinson, clemmy)\nnot Approve(robinson, mei)\nDevastate(robinson, mei)\nApprove(mei, robinson) and not Rugged(mei) -> not Pitted(mei)\nforall x (Approve(x, clemmy) and Clean(clemmy) -> Approve(x, robinson))\nforall x (Branched(x) and Rugged(x) -> not Devastate(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Rugged(x) and Branched(x) -> not Surcharge(x, robinson))\nforall x (Approve(x, clemmy) and Surcharge(x, robinson) -> Clean(clemmy))\nforall x (Miserable(x) and not Approve(x, robinson) -> Miserable(robinson))\n\nApprove(robinson, robinson)\n\nApprove(mei, clemmy) and Surcharge(mei, robinson) and forall x (Approve(x, clemmy) and Surcharge(x, robinson) -> Clean(clemmy)) -> therefore Clean(clemmy) Approve(robinson, clemmy) and Clean(clemmy) and forall x (Approve(x, clemmy) and Clean(clemmy) -> Approve(x, robinson)) -> therefore Approve(robinson, robinson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The esau is not present. The esau raise the karlie. The thomasa is shakable. The thomasa is liberian. The thomasa raise the esau. The thomasa raise the karlie. The thomasa lard the esau. The thomasa lard the karlie. The thomasa activate the esau. The karlie is shakable. The karlie is liberian. The karlie is present. The karlie does not need the esau. The karlie lard the esau. The karlie does not see the thomasa. The karlie activate the thomasa. If the thomasa lard the karlie and the thomasa is not unmatched then the thomasa is not shakable. If something lard the esau and the esau is liberian then it lard the karlie. If something is well and unmatched then it does not visit the esau. If something is unmatched and well then it does not need the karlie. If something lard the esau and it raise the karlie then the esau is liberian. If something is present and it does not see the karlie then the karlie is present. The karlie does not see the karlie.", "logic": "\nnot Present(esau)\nRaise(esau, karlie)\nShakable(thomasa)\nLiberian(thomasa)\nRaise(thomasa, esau)\nRaise(thomasa, karlie)\nLard(thomasa, esau)\nLard(thomasa, karlie)\nActivate(thomasa, esau)\nShakable(karlie)\nLiberian(karlie)\nPresent(karlie)\nnot Raise(karlie, esau)\nLard(karlie, esau)\nnot Lard(karlie, thomasa)\nActivate(karlie, thomasa)\nLard(thomasa, karlie) and not Unmatched(thomasa) -> not Shakable(thomasa)\nforall x (Lard(x, esau) and Liberian(esau) -> Lard(x, karlie))\nforall x (Well(x) and Unmatched(x) -> not Activate(x, esau))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) and Well(x) -> not Raise(x, karlie))\nforall x (Lard(x, esau) and Raise(x, karlie) -> Liberian(esau))\nforall x (Present(x) and not Lard(x, karlie) -> Present(karlie))\n\nnot Lard(karlie, karlie)\n\nLard(thomasa, esau) and Raise(thomasa, karlie) and forall x (Lard(x, esau) and Raise(x, karlie) -> Liberian(esau)) -> therefore Liberian(esau) Lard(karlie, esau) and Liberian(esau) and forall x (Lard(x, esau) and Liberian(esau) -> Lard(x, karlie)) -> therefore Lard(karlie, karlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The jordon is not socialised. The jordon fraction the newton. The beverlie is catabolic. The beverlie is mucinous. The beverlie fraction the jordon. The beverlie fraction the newton. The beverlie croak the jordon. The beverlie croak the newton. The beverlie slave the jordon. The newton is catabolic. The newton is mucinous. The newton is socialised. The newton does not need the jordon. The newton croak the jordon. The newton does not see the beverlie. The newton slave the beverlie. If the beverlie croak the newton and the beverlie is not unadjusted then the beverlie is not catabolic. If something croak the jordon and the jordon is mucinous then it croak the newton. If something is supersonic and unadjusted then it does not visit the jordon. If something is unadjusted and supersonic then it does not need the newton. If something croak the jordon and it fraction the newton then the jordon is mucinous. If something is socialised and it does not see the newton then the newton is socialised. The jordon does not see the newton.", "logic": "\nnot Socialised(jordon)\nFraction(jordon, newton)\nCatabolic(beverlie)\nMucinous(beverlie)\nFraction(beverlie, jordon)\nFraction(beverlie, newton)\nCroak(beverlie, jordon)\nCroak(beverlie, newton)\nSlave(beverlie, jordon)\nCatabolic(newton)\nMucinous(newton)\nSocialised(newton)\nnot Fraction(newton, jordon)\nCroak(newton, jordon)\nnot Croak(newton, beverlie)\nSlave(newton, beverlie)\nCroak(beverlie, newton) and not Unadjusted(beverlie) -> not Catabolic(beverlie)\nforall x (Croak(x, jordon) and Mucinous(jordon) -> Croak(x, newton))\nforall x (Supersonic(x) and Unadjusted(x) -> not Slave(x, jordon))\nforall x (Unadjusted(x) and Supersonic(x) -> not Fraction(x, newton))\nforall x (Croak(x, jordon) and Fraction(x, newton) -> Mucinous(jordon))\nforall x (Socialised(x) and not Croak(x, newton) -> Socialised(newton))\n\nnot Croak(jordon, newton)\n\nforall x (Croak(x, jordon) and Mucinous(jordon) -> Croak(x, newton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The dodi is not osmotic. The dodi braid the davine. The odella is outdoorsy. The odella is reachable. The odella braid the dodi. The odella braid the davine. The odella heal the dodi. The odella heal the davine. The odella expect the dodi. The davine is outdoorsy. The davine is reachable. The davine is osmotic. The davine does not need the dodi. The davine heal the dodi. The davine does not see the odella. The davine expect the odella. If the odella heal the davine and the odella is not septuple then the odella is not outdoorsy. If something heal the dodi and the dodi is reachable then it heal the davine. If something is mock and septuple then it does not visit the dodi. If something is septuple and mock then it does not need the davine. If something heal the dodi and it braid the davine then the dodi is reachable. If something is osmotic and it does not see the davine then the davine is osmotic. The davine expect the dodi.", "logic": "\nnot Osmotic(dodi)\nBraid(dodi, davine)\nOutdoorsy(odella)\nReachable(odella)\nBraid(odella, dodi)\nBraid(odella, davine)\nHeal(odella, dodi)\nHeal(odella, davine)\nExpect(odella, dodi)\nOutdoorsy(davine)\nReachable(davine)\nOsmotic(davine)\nnot Braid(davine, dodi)\nHeal(davine, dodi)\nnot Heal(davine, odella)\nExpect(davine, odella)\nHeal(odella, davine) and not Septuple(odella) -> not Outdoorsy(odella)\nforall x (Heal(x, dodi) and Reachable(dodi) -> Heal(x, davine))\nforall x (Mock(x) and Septuple(x) -> not Expect(x, dodi))\nforall x (Septuple(x) and Mock(x) -> not Braid(x, davine))\nforall x (Heal(x, dodi) and Braid(x, davine) -> Reachable(dodi))\nforall x (Osmotic(x) and not Heal(x, davine) -> Osmotic(davine))\n\nExpect(davine, dodi)\n\nExpect(davine, dodi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The nicoline is not bushed. The nicoline tint the cyndi. The talya is unflurried. The talya is boundless. The talya tint the nicoline. The talya tint the cyndi. The talya predecease the nicoline. The talya predecease the cyndi. The talya brattle the nicoline. The cyndi is unflurried. The cyndi is boundless. The cyndi is bushed. The cyndi does not need the nicoline. The cyndi predecease the nicoline. The cyndi does not see the talya. The cyndi brattle the talya. If the talya predecease the cyndi and the talya is not projecting then the talya is not unflurried. If something predecease the nicoline and the nicoline is boundless then it predecease the cyndi. If something is pyrolignic and projecting then it does not visit the nicoline. If something is projecting and pyrolignic then it does not need the cyndi. If something predecease the nicoline and it tint the cyndi then the nicoline is boundless. If something is bushed and it does not see the cyndi then the cyndi is bushed. The nicoline does not see the talya.", "logic": "\nnot Bushed(nicoline)\nTint(nicoline, cyndi)\nUnflurried(talya)\nBoundless(talya)\nTint(talya, nicoline)\nTint(talya, cyndi)\nPredecease(talya, nicoline)\nPredecease(talya, cyndi)\nBrattle(talya, nicoline)\nUnflurried(cyndi)\nBoundless(cyndi)\nBushed(cyndi)\nnot Tint(cyndi, nicoline)\nPredecease(cyndi, nicoline)\nnot Predecease(cyndi, talya)\nBrattle(cyndi, talya)\nPredecease(talya, cyndi) and not Projecting(talya) -> not Unflurried(talya)\nforall x (Predecease(x, nicoline) and Boundless(nicoline) -> Predecease(x, cyndi))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and Projecting(x) -> not Brattle(x, nicoline))\nforall x (Projecting(x) and Pyrolignic(x) -> not Tint(x, cyndi))\nforall x (Predecease(x, nicoline) and Tint(x, cyndi) -> Boundless(nicoline))\nforall x (Bushed(x) and not Predecease(x, cyndi) -> Bushed(cyndi))\n\nnot Predecease(nicoline, talya)\n\nnot Predecease(nicoline, talya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The dafna is not dominican. The dafna sclaff the lancelot. The muriel is rifled. The muriel is collected. The muriel sclaff the dafna. The muriel sclaff the lancelot. The muriel hazard the dafna. The muriel hazard the lancelot. The muriel defrock the dafna. The lancelot is rifled. The lancelot is collected. The lancelot is dominican. The lancelot does not need the dafna. The lancelot hazard the dafna. The lancelot does not see the muriel. The lancelot defrock the muriel. If the muriel hazard the lancelot and the muriel is not spanish then the muriel is not rifled. If something hazard the dafna and the dafna is collected then it hazard the lancelot. If something is offish and spanish then it does not visit the dafna. If something is spanish and offish then it does not need the lancelot. If something hazard the dafna and it sclaff the lancelot then the dafna is collected. If something is dominican and it does not see the lancelot then the lancelot is dominican. The dafna is offish.", "logic": "\nnot Dominican(dafna)\nSclaff(dafna, lancelot)\nRifled(muriel)\nCollected(muriel)\nSclaff(muriel, dafna)\nSclaff(muriel, lancelot)\nHazard(muriel, dafna)\nHazard(muriel, lancelot)\nDefrock(muriel, dafna)\nRifled(lancelot)\nCollected(lancelot)\nDominican(lancelot)\nnot Sclaff(lancelot, dafna)\nHazard(lancelot, dafna)\nnot Hazard(lancelot, muriel)\nDefrock(lancelot, muriel)\nHazard(muriel, lancelot) and not Spanish(muriel) -> not Rifled(muriel)\nforall x (Hazard(x, dafna) and Collected(dafna) -> Hazard(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Offish(x) and Spanish(x) -> not Defrock(x, dafna))\nforall x (Spanish(x) and Offish(x) -> not Sclaff(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Hazard(x, dafna) and Sclaff(x, lancelot) -> Collected(dafna))\nforall x (Dominican(x) and not Hazard(x, lancelot) -> Dominican(lancelot))\n\nOffish(dafna)\n\nOffish(dafna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The jeth is not exterior. The jeth politick the giavani. The kaylyn is divers. The kaylyn is clubfooted. The kaylyn politick the jeth. The kaylyn politick the giavani. The kaylyn extract the jeth. The kaylyn extract the giavani. The kaylyn reduce the jeth. The giavani is divers. The giavani is clubfooted. The giavani is exterior. The giavani does not need the jeth. The giavani extract the jeth. The giavani does not see the kaylyn. The giavani reduce the kaylyn. If the kaylyn extract the giavani and the kaylyn is not kaput then the kaylyn is not divers. If something extract the jeth and the jeth is clubfooted then it extract the giavani. If something is bicornuous and kaput then it does not visit the jeth. If something is kaput and bicornuous then it does not need the giavani. If something extract the jeth and it politick the giavani then the jeth is clubfooted. If something is exterior and it does not see the giavani then the giavani is exterior. The giavani is not bicornuous.", "logic": "\nnot Exterior(jeth)\nPolitick(jeth, giavani)\nDivers(kaylyn)\nClubfooted(kaylyn)\nPolitick(kaylyn, jeth)\nPolitick(kaylyn, giavani)\nExtract(kaylyn, jeth)\nExtract(kaylyn, giavani)\nReduce(kaylyn, jeth)\nDivers(giavani)\nClubfooted(giavani)\nExterior(giavani)\nnot Politick(giavani, jeth)\nExtract(giavani, jeth)\nnot Extract(giavani, kaylyn)\nReduce(giavani, kaylyn)\nExtract(kaylyn, giavani) and not Kaput(kaylyn) -> not Divers(kaylyn)\nforall x (Extract(x, jeth) and Clubfooted(jeth) -> Extract(x, giavani))\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) and Kaput(x) -> not Reduce(x, jeth))\nforall x (Kaput(x) and Bicornuous(x) -> not Politick(x, giavani))\nforall x (Extract(x, jeth) and Politick(x, giavani) -> Clubfooted(jeth))\nforall x (Exterior(x) and not Extract(x, giavani) -> Exterior(giavani))\n\nnot Bicornuous(giavani)\n\nnot Bicornuous(giavani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The kia is not disquieted. The kia ghost the bennie. The corliss is focussed. The corliss is aecial. The corliss ghost the kia. The corliss ghost the bennie. The corliss shipwreck the kia. The corliss shipwreck the bennie. The corliss infract the kia. The bennie is focussed. The bennie is aecial. The bennie is disquieted. The bennie does not need the kia. The bennie shipwreck the kia. The bennie does not see the corliss. The bennie infract the corliss. If the corliss shipwreck the bennie and the corliss is not ironclad then the corliss is not focussed. If something shipwreck the kia and the kia is aecial then it shipwreck the bennie. If something is entire and ironclad then it does not visit the kia. If something is ironclad and entire then it does not need the bennie. If something shipwreck the kia and it ghost the bennie then the kia is aecial. If something is disquieted and it does not see the bennie then the bennie is disquieted. The corliss infract the corliss.", "logic": "\nnot Disquieted(kia)\nGhost(kia, bennie)\nFocussed(corliss)\nAecial(corliss)\nGhost(corliss, kia)\nGhost(corliss, bennie)\nShipwreck(corliss, kia)\nShipwreck(corliss, bennie)\nInfract(corliss, kia)\nFocussed(bennie)\nAecial(bennie)\nDisquieted(bennie)\nnot Ghost(bennie, kia)\nShipwreck(bennie, kia)\nnot Shipwreck(bennie, corliss)\nInfract(bennie, corliss)\nShipwreck(corliss, bennie) and not Ironclad(corliss) -> not Focussed(corliss)\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, kia) and Aecial(kia) -> Shipwreck(x, bennie))\nforall x (Entire(x) and Ironclad(x) -> not Infract(x, kia))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) and Entire(x) -> not Ghost(x, bennie))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, kia) and Ghost(x, bennie) -> Aecial(kia))\nforall x (Disquieted(x) and not Shipwreck(x, bennie) -> Disquieted(bennie))\n\nInfract(corliss, corliss)\n\nInfract(corliss, corliss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-104"} {"premises": "The renell irrigate the adey. The renell is succulent. The renell is credible. The renell is variolar. The renell is anapaestic. The renell is incurable. The renell except the adey. The renell flash the adey. The adey irrigate the renell. The adey is credible. The adey is incurable. The adey flash the renell. If someone flash the renell and the renell flash the adey then they chase the adey. If someone irrigate the adey then the adey irrigate the renell. If someone except the renell then they are succulent. If someone irrigate the adey and they visit the adey then they are credible. If someone except the renell and they are credible then they are incurable. If someone irrigate the adey and they visit the renell then the adey is anapaestic. The renell is credible.", "logic": "\nIrrigate(renell, adey)\nSucculent(renell)\nCredible(renell)\nVariolar(renell)\nAnapaestic(renell)\nIncurable(renell)\nExcept(renell, adey)\nFlash(renell, adey)\nIrrigate(adey, renell)\nCredible(adey)\nIncurable(adey)\nFlash(adey, renell)\nforall x (Flash(x, renell) and Flash(renell, adey) -> Irrigate(x, adey))\nforall x (Irrigate(x, adey) -> Irrigate(adey, renell))\nforall x (Except(x, renell) -> Succulent(x))\nforall x (Irrigate(x, adey) and Flash(x, adey) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Except(x, renell) and Credible(x) -> Incurable(x))\nforall x (Irrigate(x, adey) and Flash(x, renell) -> Anapaestic(adey))\n\nCredible(renell)\n\ntherefore Credible(renell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The shayla croquet the ira. The shayla is snooty. The shayla is slashed. The shayla is putrescent. The shayla is untoothed. The shayla is both. The shayla cauterize the ira. The shayla hook the ira. The ira croquet the shayla. The ira is slashed. The ira is both. The ira hook the shayla. If someone hook the shayla and the shayla hook the ira then they chase the ira. If someone croquet the ira then the ira croquet the shayla. If someone cauterize the shayla then they are snooty. If someone croquet the ira and they visit the ira then they are slashed. If someone cauterize the shayla and they are slashed then they are both. If someone croquet the ira and they visit the shayla then the ira is untoothed. The shayla is not snooty.", "logic": "\nCroquet(shayla, ira)\nSnooty(shayla)\nSlashed(shayla)\nPutrescent(shayla)\nUntoothed(shayla)\nBoth(shayla)\nCauterize(shayla, ira)\nHook(shayla, ira)\nCroquet(ira, shayla)\nSlashed(ira)\nBoth(ira)\nHook(ira, shayla)\nforall x (Hook(x, shayla) and Hook(shayla, ira) -> Croquet(x, ira))\nforall x (Croquet(x, ira) -> Croquet(ira, shayla))\nforall x (Cauterize(x, shayla) -> Snooty(x))\nforall x (Croquet(x, ira) and Hook(x, ira) -> Slashed(x))\nforall x (Cauterize(x, shayla) and Slashed(x) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Croquet(x, ira) and Hook(x, shayla) -> Untoothed(ira))\n\nnot Snooty(shayla)\n\ntherefore Snooty(shayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The remus dandle the howie. The remus is unlike. The remus is pent. The remus is xanthous. The remus is takeout. The remus is rosy. The remus decontrol the howie. The remus dehorn the howie. The howie dandle the remus. The howie is pent. The howie is rosy. The howie dehorn the remus. If someone dehorn the remus and the remus dehorn the howie then they chase the howie. If someone dandle the howie then the howie dandle the remus. If someone decontrol the remus then they are unlike. If someone dandle the howie and they visit the howie then they are pent. If someone decontrol the remus and they are pent then they are rosy. If someone dandle the howie and they visit the remus then the howie is takeout. The howie dandle the howie.", "logic": "\nDandle(remus, howie)\nUnlike(remus)\nPent(remus)\nXanthous(remus)\nTakeout(remus)\nRosy(remus)\nDecontrol(remus, howie)\nDehorn(remus, howie)\nDandle(howie, remus)\nPent(howie)\nRosy(howie)\nDehorn(howie, remus)\nforall x (Dehorn(x, remus) and Dehorn(remus, howie) -> Dandle(x, howie))\nforall x (Dandle(x, howie) -> Dandle(howie, remus))\nforall x (Decontrol(x, remus) -> Unlike(x))\nforall x (Dandle(x, howie) and Dehorn(x, howie) -> Pent(x))\nforall x (Decontrol(x, remus) and Pent(x) -> Rosy(x))\nforall x (Dandle(x, howie) and Dehorn(x, remus) -> Takeout(howie))\n\nDandle(howie, howie)\n\nDehorn(howie, remus) and Dehorn(remus, howie) and forall x (Dehorn(x, remus) and Dehorn(remus, howie) -> Dandle(x, howie)) -> therefore Dandle(howie, howie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The devinne bolshevise the patricia. The devinne is vain. The devinne is triangular. The devinne is unformed. The devinne is freckled. The devinne is cabalistic. The devinne palaver the patricia. The devinne rappel the patricia. The patricia bolshevise the devinne. The patricia is triangular. The patricia is cabalistic. The patricia rappel the devinne. If someone rappel the devinne and the devinne rappel the patricia then they chase the patricia. If someone bolshevise the patricia then the patricia bolshevise the devinne. If someone palaver the devinne then they are vain. If someone bolshevise the patricia and they visit the patricia then they are triangular. If someone palaver the devinne and they are triangular then they are cabalistic. If someone bolshevise the patricia and they visit the devinne then the patricia is freckled. The patricia does not chase the patricia.", "logic": "\nBolshevise(devinne, patricia)\nVain(devinne)\nTriangular(devinne)\nUnformed(devinne)\nFreckled(devinne)\nCabalistic(devinne)\nPalaver(devinne, patricia)\nRappel(devinne, patricia)\nBolshevise(patricia, devinne)\nTriangular(patricia)\nCabalistic(patricia)\nRappel(patricia, devinne)\nforall x (Rappel(x, devinne) and Rappel(devinne, patricia) -> Bolshevise(x, patricia))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, patricia) -> Bolshevise(patricia, devinne))\nforall x (Palaver(x, devinne) -> Vain(x))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, patricia) and Rappel(x, patricia) -> Triangular(x))\nforall x (Palaver(x, devinne) and Triangular(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, patricia) and Rappel(x, devinne) -> Freckled(patricia))\n\nnot Bolshevise(patricia, patricia)\n\nRappel(patricia, devinne) and Rappel(devinne, patricia) and forall x (Rappel(x, devinne) and Rappel(devinne, patricia) -> Bolshevise(x, patricia)) -> therefore Bolshevise(patricia, patricia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The patience plain the cynthy. The patience is boisterous. The patience is lossy. The patience is albitic. The patience is enigmatic. The patience is opposite. The patience reappear the cynthy. The patience fright the cynthy. The cynthy plain the patience. The cynthy is lossy. The cynthy is opposite. The cynthy fright the patience. If someone fright the patience and the patience fright the cynthy then they chase the cynthy. If someone plain the cynthy then the cynthy plain the patience. If someone reappear the patience then they are boisterous. If someone plain the cynthy and they visit the cynthy then they are lossy. If someone reappear the patience and they are lossy then they are opposite. If someone plain the cynthy and they visit the patience then the cynthy is enigmatic. The cynthy is enigmatic.", "logic": "\nPlain(patience, cynthy)\nBoisterous(patience)\nLossy(patience)\nAlbitic(patience)\nEnigmatic(patience)\nOpposite(patience)\nReappear(patience, cynthy)\nFright(patience, cynthy)\nPlain(cynthy, patience)\nLossy(cynthy)\nOpposite(cynthy)\nFright(cynthy, patience)\nforall x (Fright(x, patience) and Fright(patience, cynthy) -> Plain(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Plain(x, cynthy) -> Plain(cynthy, patience))\nforall x (Reappear(x, patience) -> Boisterous(x))\nforall x (Plain(x, cynthy) and Fright(x, cynthy) -> Lossy(x))\nforall x (Reappear(x, patience) and Lossy(x) -> Opposite(x))\nforall x (Plain(x, cynthy) and Fright(x, patience) -> Enigmatic(cynthy))\n\nEnigmatic(cynthy)\n\nFright(cynthy, patience) and Fright(patience, cynthy) and forall x (Fright(x, patience) and Fright(patience, cynthy) -> Plain(x, cynthy)) -> therefore Plain(cynthy, cynthy) Plain(cynthy, cynthy) and Fright(cynthy, patience) and forall x (Plain(x, cynthy) and Fright(x, patience) -> Enigmatic(cynthy)) -> therefore Enigmatic(cynthy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The maren vent the fanny. The maren is colonised. The maren is puritanic. The maren is penumbral. The maren is punishing. The maren is nocturnal. The maren tarnish the fanny. The maren interlude the fanny. The fanny vent the maren. The fanny is puritanic. The fanny is nocturnal. The fanny interlude the maren. If someone interlude the maren and the maren interlude the fanny then they chase the fanny. If someone vent the fanny then the fanny vent the maren. If someone tarnish the maren then they are colonised. If someone vent the fanny and they visit the fanny then they are puritanic. If someone tarnish the maren and they are puritanic then they are nocturnal. If someone vent the fanny and they visit the maren then the fanny is punishing. The fanny is not punishing.", "logic": "\nVent(maren, fanny)\nColonised(maren)\nPuritanic(maren)\nPenumbral(maren)\nPunishing(maren)\nNocturnal(maren)\nTarnish(maren, fanny)\nInterlude(maren, fanny)\nVent(fanny, maren)\nPuritanic(fanny)\nNocturnal(fanny)\nInterlude(fanny, maren)\nforall x (Interlude(x, maren) and Interlude(maren, fanny) -> Vent(x, fanny))\nforall x (Vent(x, fanny) -> Vent(fanny, maren))\nforall x (Tarnish(x, maren) -> Colonised(x))\nforall x (Vent(x, fanny) and Interlude(x, fanny) -> Puritanic(x))\nforall x (Tarnish(x, maren) and Puritanic(x) -> Nocturnal(x))\nforall x (Vent(x, fanny) and Interlude(x, maren) -> Punishing(fanny))\n\nnot Punishing(fanny)\n\nInterlude(fanny, maren) and Interlude(maren, fanny) and forall x (Interlude(x, maren) and Interlude(maren, fanny) -> Vent(x, fanny)) -> therefore Vent(fanny, fanny) Vent(fanny, fanny) and Interlude(fanny, maren) and forall x (Vent(x, fanny) and Interlude(x, maren) -> Punishing(fanny)) -> therefore Punishing(fanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The felecia skydive the jonny. The felecia is roughdried. The felecia is windup. The felecia is corvine. The felecia is acrophobic. The felecia is unforceful. The felecia scrub the jonny. The felecia loiter the jonny. The jonny skydive the felecia. The jonny is windup. The jonny is unforceful. The jonny loiter the felecia. If someone loiter the felecia and the felecia loiter the jonny then they chase the jonny. If someone skydive the jonny then the jonny skydive the felecia. If someone scrub the felecia then they are roughdried. If someone skydive the jonny and they visit the jonny then they are windup. If someone scrub the felecia and they are windup then they are unforceful. If someone skydive the jonny and they visit the felecia then the jonny is acrophobic. The jonny is not roughdried.", "logic": "\nSkydive(felecia, jonny)\nRoughdried(felecia)\nWindup(felecia)\nCorvine(felecia)\nAcrophobic(felecia)\nUnforceful(felecia)\nScrub(felecia, jonny)\nLoiter(felecia, jonny)\nSkydive(jonny, felecia)\nWindup(jonny)\nUnforceful(jonny)\nLoiter(jonny, felecia)\nforall x (Loiter(x, felecia) and Loiter(felecia, jonny) -> Skydive(x, jonny))\nforall x (Skydive(x, jonny) -> Skydive(jonny, felecia))\nforall x (Scrub(x, felecia) -> Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Skydive(x, jonny) and Loiter(x, jonny) -> Windup(x))\nforall x (Scrub(x, felecia) and Windup(x) -> Unforceful(x))\nforall x (Skydive(x, jonny) and Loiter(x, felecia) -> Acrophobic(jonny))\n\nnot Roughdried(jonny)\n\nforall x (Scrub(x, felecia) -> Roughdried(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The wandis steady the maryjo. The wandis is basidial. The wandis is lustful. The wandis is burbly. The wandis is insured. The wandis is cute. The wandis analyse the maryjo. The wandis eagle the maryjo. The maryjo steady the wandis. The maryjo is lustful. The maryjo is cute. The maryjo eagle the wandis. If someone eagle the wandis and the wandis eagle the maryjo then they chase the maryjo. If someone steady the maryjo then the maryjo steady the wandis. If someone analyse the wandis then they are basidial. If someone steady the maryjo and they visit the maryjo then they are lustful. If someone analyse the wandis and they are lustful then they are cute. If someone steady the maryjo and they visit the wandis then the maryjo is insured. The wandis eagle the wandis.", "logic": "\nSteady(wandis, maryjo)\nBasidial(wandis)\nLustful(wandis)\nBurbly(wandis)\nInsured(wandis)\nCute(wandis)\nAnalyse(wandis, maryjo)\nEagle(wandis, maryjo)\nSteady(maryjo, wandis)\nLustful(maryjo)\nCute(maryjo)\nEagle(maryjo, wandis)\nforall x (Eagle(x, wandis) and Eagle(wandis, maryjo) -> Steady(x, maryjo))\nforall x (Steady(x, maryjo) -> Steady(maryjo, wandis))\nforall x (Analyse(x, wandis) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Steady(x, maryjo) and Eagle(x, maryjo) -> Lustful(x))\nforall x (Analyse(x, wandis) and Lustful(x) -> Cute(x))\nforall x (Steady(x, maryjo) and Eagle(x, wandis) -> Insured(maryjo))\n\nEagle(wandis, wandis)\n\nEagle(wandis, wandis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The henrik embarrass the ali. The henrik is unbeloved. The henrik is coseismic. The henrik is thundery. The henrik is chilean. The henrik is wasted. The henrik resort the ali. The henrik coincide the ali. The ali embarrass the henrik. The ali is coseismic. The ali is wasted. The ali coincide the henrik. If someone coincide the henrik and the henrik coincide the ali then they chase the ali. If someone embarrass the ali then the ali embarrass the henrik. If someone resort the henrik then they are unbeloved. If someone embarrass the ali and they visit the ali then they are coseismic. If someone resort the henrik and they are coseismic then they are wasted. If someone embarrass the ali and they visit the henrik then the ali is chilean. The ali does not need the ali.", "logic": "\nEmbarrass(henrik, ali)\nUnbeloved(henrik)\nCoseismic(henrik)\nThundery(henrik)\nChilean(henrik)\nWasted(henrik)\nResort(henrik, ali)\nCoincide(henrik, ali)\nEmbarrass(ali, henrik)\nCoseismic(ali)\nWasted(ali)\nCoincide(ali, henrik)\nforall x (Coincide(x, henrik) and Coincide(henrik, ali) -> Embarrass(x, ali))\nforall x (Embarrass(x, ali) -> Embarrass(ali, henrik))\nforall x (Resort(x, henrik) -> Unbeloved(x))\nforall x (Embarrass(x, ali) and Coincide(x, ali) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Resort(x, henrik) and Coseismic(x) -> Wasted(x))\nforall x (Embarrass(x, ali) and Coincide(x, henrik) -> Chilean(ali))\n\nnot Resort(ali, ali)\n\nnot Resort(ali, ali) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The wallache summarise the elisha. The wallache is pallid. The wallache is aversive. The wallache is stearic. The wallache is humic. The wallache is attentive. The wallache incarnate the elisha. The wallache publish the elisha. The elisha summarise the wallache. The elisha is aversive. The elisha is attentive. The elisha publish the wallache. If someone publish the wallache and the wallache publish the elisha then they chase the elisha. If someone summarise the elisha then the elisha summarise the wallache. If someone incarnate the wallache then they are pallid. If someone summarise the elisha and they visit the elisha then they are aversive. If someone incarnate the wallache and they are aversive then they are attentive. If someone summarise the elisha and they visit the wallache then the elisha is humic. The elisha is stearic.", "logic": "\nSummarise(wallache, elisha)\nPallid(wallache)\nAversive(wallache)\nStearic(wallache)\nHumic(wallache)\nAttentive(wallache)\nIncarnate(wallache, elisha)\nPublish(wallache, elisha)\nSummarise(elisha, wallache)\nAversive(elisha)\nAttentive(elisha)\nPublish(elisha, wallache)\nforall x (Publish(x, wallache) and Publish(wallache, elisha) -> Summarise(x, elisha))\nforall x (Summarise(x, elisha) -> Summarise(elisha, wallache))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, wallache) -> Pallid(x))\nforall x (Summarise(x, elisha) and Publish(x, elisha) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, wallache) and Aversive(x) -> Attentive(x))\nforall x (Summarise(x, elisha) and Publish(x, wallache) -> Humic(elisha))\n\nStearic(elisha)\n\nStearic(elisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The alisa moor the melina. The alisa is milanese. The alisa is squat. The alisa is strident. The alisa is crumbly. The alisa is emphasized. The alisa forfend the melina. The alisa affirm the melina. The melina moor the alisa. The melina is squat. The melina is emphasized. The melina affirm the alisa. If someone affirm the alisa and the alisa affirm the melina then they chase the melina. If someone moor the melina then the melina moor the alisa. If someone forfend the alisa then they are milanese. If someone moor the melina and they visit the melina then they are squat. If someone forfend the alisa and they are squat then they are emphasized. If someone moor the melina and they visit the alisa then the melina is crumbly. The melina does not need the alisa.", "logic": "\nMoor(alisa, melina)\nMilanese(alisa)\nSquat(alisa)\nStrident(alisa)\nCrumbly(alisa)\nEmphasized(alisa)\nForfend(alisa, melina)\nAffirm(alisa, melina)\nMoor(melina, alisa)\nSquat(melina)\nEmphasized(melina)\nAffirm(melina, alisa)\nforall x (Affirm(x, alisa) and Affirm(alisa, melina) -> Moor(x, melina))\nforall x (Moor(x, melina) -> Moor(melina, alisa))\nforall x (Forfend(x, alisa) -> Milanese(x))\nforall x (Moor(x, melina) and Affirm(x, melina) -> Squat(x))\nforall x (Forfend(x, alisa) and Squat(x) -> Emphasized(x))\nforall x (Moor(x, melina) and Affirm(x, alisa) -> Crumbly(melina))\n\nnot Forfend(melina, alisa)\n\nnot Forfend(melina, alisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "The maggie spank the crissie. The maggie is reduced. The maggie is aeschylean. The maggie is feasible. The maggie is nidicolous. The maggie is vengeful. The maggie minify the crissie. The maggie shield the crissie. The crissie spank the maggie. The crissie is aeschylean. The crissie is vengeful. The crissie shield the maggie. If someone shield the maggie and the maggie shield the crissie then they chase the crissie. If someone spank the crissie then the crissie spank the maggie. If someone minify the maggie then they are reduced. If someone spank the crissie and they visit the crissie then they are aeschylean. If someone minify the maggie and they are aeschylean then they are vengeful. If someone spank the crissie and they visit the maggie then the crissie is nidicolous. The maggie minify the maggie.", "logic": "\nSpank(maggie, crissie)\nReduced(maggie)\nAeschylean(maggie)\nFeasible(maggie)\nNidicolous(maggie)\nVengeful(maggie)\nMinify(maggie, crissie)\nShield(maggie, crissie)\nSpank(crissie, maggie)\nAeschylean(crissie)\nVengeful(crissie)\nShield(crissie, maggie)\nforall x (Shield(x, maggie) and Shield(maggie, crissie) -> Spank(x, crissie))\nforall x (Spank(x, crissie) -> Spank(crissie, maggie))\nforall x (Minify(x, maggie) -> Reduced(x))\nforall x (Spank(x, crissie) and Shield(x, crissie) -> Aeschylean(x))\nforall x (Minify(x, maggie) and Aeschylean(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Spank(x, crissie) and Shield(x, maggie) -> Nidicolous(crissie))\n\nMinify(maggie, maggie)\n\nMinify(maggie, maggie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1705"} {"premises": "Brice is thrown. Brice is spinal. Coralyn is blasted. Coralyn is fivefold. Coralyn is formed. Coralyn is boring. Shurlocke is not blasted. Shurlocke is not fivefold. Shurlocke is thrown. Shurlocke is spinal. Shurlocke is boring. Boniface is fivefold. Boniface is thrown. Boniface is spinal. Boniface is formed. All fivefold things are boring. If Brice is formed then Brice is unroofed. White things are unroofed. If something is formed and not blasted then it is not unroofed. If something is boring and not spinal then it is not fivefold. Rough things are fivefold. If Brice is thrown then Brice is boring. If something is formed and boring then it is thrown. Boniface is thrown.", "logic": "\nThrown(brice)\nSpinal(brice)\nBlasted(coralyn)\nFivefold(coralyn)\nFormed(coralyn)\nBoring(coralyn)\nnot Blasted(shurlocke)\nnot Fivefold(shurlocke)\nThrown(shurlocke)\nSpinal(shurlocke)\nBoring(shurlocke)\nFivefold(boniface)\nThrown(boniface)\nSpinal(boniface)\nFormed(boniface)\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Boring(x))\nFormed(brice) -> Unroofed(brice)\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Formed(x) and not Blasted(x) -> not Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) and not Spinal(x) -> not Fivefold(x))\nforall x (Formed(x) -> Fivefold(x))\nThrown(brice) -> Boring(brice)\nforall x (Formed(x) and Boring(x) -> Thrown(x))\n\nThrown(boniface)\n\ntherefore Thrown(boniface)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Edithe is corked. Edithe is foul. Vlad is shoeless. Vlad is unclad. Vlad is allocable. Vlad is breakable. Elnora is not shoeless. Elnora is not unclad. Elnora is corked. Elnora is foul. Elnora is breakable. Mireielle is unclad. Mireielle is corked. Mireielle is foul. Mireielle is allocable. All unclad things are breakable. If Edithe is allocable then Edithe is insincere. White things are insincere. If something is allocable and not shoeless then it is not insincere. If something is breakable and not foul then it is not unclad. Rough things are unclad. If Edithe is corked then Edithe is breakable. If something is allocable and breakable then it is corked. Vlad is not allocable.", "logic": "\nCorked(edithe)\nFoul(edithe)\nShoeless(vlad)\nUnclad(vlad)\nAllocable(vlad)\nBreakable(vlad)\nnot Shoeless(elnora)\nnot Unclad(elnora)\nCorked(elnora)\nFoul(elnora)\nBreakable(elnora)\nUnclad(mireielle)\nCorked(mireielle)\nFoul(mireielle)\nAllocable(mireielle)\nforall x (Unclad(x) -> Breakable(x))\nAllocable(edithe) -> Insincere(edithe)\nforall x (Breakable(x) -> Insincere(x))\nforall x (Allocable(x) and not Shoeless(x) -> not Insincere(x))\nforall x (Breakable(x) and not Foul(x) -> not Unclad(x))\nforall x (Allocable(x) -> Unclad(x))\nCorked(edithe) -> Breakable(edithe)\nforall x (Allocable(x) and Breakable(x) -> Corked(x))\n\nnot Allocable(vlad)\n\ntherefore Allocable(vlad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Michaela is stressed. Michaela is unrevealed. Gardener is pulpy. Gardener is lightless. Gardener is reckless. Gardener is saurian. Denni is not pulpy. Denni is not lightless. Denni is stressed. Denni is unrevealed. Denni is saurian. Janaya is lightless. Janaya is stressed. Janaya is unrevealed. Janaya is reckless. All lightless things are saurian. If Michaela is reckless then Michaela is colloquial. White things are colloquial. If something is reckless and not pulpy then it is not colloquial. If something is saurian and not unrevealed then it is not lightless. Rough things are lightless. If Michaela is stressed then Michaela is saurian. If something is reckless and saurian then it is stressed. Michaela is saurian.", "logic": "\nStressed(michaela)\nUnrevealed(michaela)\nPulpy(gardener)\nLightless(gardener)\nReckless(gardener)\nSaurian(gardener)\nnot Pulpy(denni)\nnot Lightless(denni)\nStressed(denni)\nUnrevealed(denni)\nSaurian(denni)\nLightless(janaya)\nStressed(janaya)\nUnrevealed(janaya)\nReckless(janaya)\nforall x (Lightless(x) -> Saurian(x))\nReckless(michaela) -> Colloquial(michaela)\nforall x (Saurian(x) -> Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) and not Pulpy(x) -> not Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) and not Unrevealed(x) -> not Lightless(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) -> Lightless(x))\nStressed(michaela) -> Saurian(michaela)\nforall x (Reckless(x) and Saurian(x) -> Stressed(x))\n\nSaurian(michaela)\n\nStressed(michaela) and Stressed(michaela) -> Saurian(michaela) -> therefore Saurian(michaela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Phillip is stunned. Phillip is hearsay. Othilie is crenated. Othilie is unavailing. Othilie is elliptical. Othilie is raiseable. Shayna is not crenated. Shayna is not unavailing. Shayna is stunned. Shayna is hearsay. Shayna is raiseable. Danita is unavailing. Danita is stunned. Danita is hearsay. Danita is elliptical. All unavailing things are raiseable. If Phillip is elliptical then Phillip is promotive. White things are promotive. If something is elliptical and not crenated then it is not promotive. If something is raiseable and not hearsay then it is not unavailing. Rough things are unavailing. If Phillip is stunned then Phillip is raiseable. If something is elliptical and raiseable then it is stunned. Danita is not raiseable.", "logic": "\nStunned(phillip)\nHearsay(phillip)\nCrenated(othilie)\nUnavailing(othilie)\nElliptical(othilie)\nRaiseable(othilie)\nnot Crenated(shayna)\nnot Unavailing(shayna)\nStunned(shayna)\nHearsay(shayna)\nRaiseable(shayna)\nUnavailing(danita)\nStunned(danita)\nHearsay(danita)\nElliptical(danita)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Raiseable(x))\nElliptical(phillip) -> Promotive(phillip)\nforall x (Raiseable(x) -> Promotive(x))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) and not Crenated(x) -> not Promotive(x))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) and not Hearsay(x) -> not Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) -> Unavailing(x))\nStunned(phillip) -> Raiseable(phillip)\nforall x (Elliptical(x) and Raiseable(x) -> Stunned(x))\n\nnot Raiseable(danita)\n\nUnavailing(danita) and forall x (Unavailing(x) -> Raiseable(x)) -> therefore Raiseable(danita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Weslie is amiss. Weslie is egoistical. Elnora is communist. Elnora is mental. Elnora is adscripted. Elnora is pouched. Adah is not communist. Adah is not mental. Adah is amiss. Adah is egoistical. Adah is pouched. Stephie is mental. Stephie is amiss. Stephie is egoistical. Stephie is adscripted. All mental things are pouched. If Weslie is adscripted then Weslie is truant. White things are truant. If something is adscripted and not communist then it is not truant. If something is pouched and not egoistical then it is not mental. Rough things are mental. If Weslie is amiss then Weslie is pouched. If something is adscripted and pouched then it is amiss. Stephie is truant.", "logic": "\nAmiss(weslie)\nEgoistical(weslie)\nCommunist(elnora)\nMental(elnora)\nAdscripted(elnora)\nPouched(elnora)\nnot Communist(adah)\nnot Mental(adah)\nAmiss(adah)\nEgoistical(adah)\nPouched(adah)\nMental(stephie)\nAmiss(stephie)\nEgoistical(stephie)\nAdscripted(stephie)\nforall x (Mental(x) -> Pouched(x))\nAdscripted(weslie) -> Truant(weslie)\nforall x (Pouched(x) -> Truant(x))\nforall x (Adscripted(x) and not Communist(x) -> not Truant(x))\nforall x (Pouched(x) and not Egoistical(x) -> not Mental(x))\nforall x (Adscripted(x) -> Mental(x))\nAmiss(weslie) -> Pouched(weslie)\nforall x (Adscripted(x) and Pouched(x) -> Amiss(x))\n\nTruant(stephie)\n\nMental(stephie) and forall x (Mental(x) -> Pouched(x)) -> therefore Pouched(stephie) Pouched(stephie) and forall x (Pouched(x) -> Truant(x)) -> therefore Truant(stephie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Ashleigh is resinlike. Ashleigh is pentatonic. Jonah is homey. Jonah is matching. Jonah is keeled. Jonah is peerless. Slim is not homey. Slim is not matching. Slim is resinlike. Slim is pentatonic. Slim is peerless. Waylan is matching. Waylan is resinlike. Waylan is pentatonic. Waylan is keeled. All matching things are peerless. If Ashleigh is keeled then Ashleigh is ubiquitous. White things are ubiquitous. If something is keeled and not homey then it is not ubiquitous. If something is peerless and not pentatonic then it is not matching. Rough things are matching. If Ashleigh is resinlike then Ashleigh is peerless. If something is keeled and peerless then it is resinlike. Ashleigh is not ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nResinlike(ashleigh)\nPentatonic(ashleigh)\nHomey(jonah)\nMatching(jonah)\nKeeled(jonah)\nPeerless(jonah)\nnot Homey(slim)\nnot Matching(slim)\nResinlike(slim)\nPentatonic(slim)\nPeerless(slim)\nMatching(waylan)\nResinlike(waylan)\nPentatonic(waylan)\nKeeled(waylan)\nforall x (Matching(x) -> Peerless(x))\nKeeled(ashleigh) -> Ubiquitous(ashleigh)\nforall x (Peerless(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Keeled(x) and not Homey(x) -> not Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Peerless(x) and not Pentatonic(x) -> not Matching(x))\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Matching(x))\nResinlike(ashleigh) -> Peerless(ashleigh)\nforall x (Keeled(x) and Peerless(x) -> Resinlike(x))\n\nnot Ubiquitous(ashleigh)\n\nResinlike(ashleigh) and Resinlike(ashleigh) -> Peerless(ashleigh) -> therefore Peerless(ashleigh) Peerless(ashleigh) and forall x (Peerless(x) -> Ubiquitous(x)) -> therefore Ubiquitous(ashleigh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Cherlyn is pyramidal. Cherlyn is artesian. Cosmo is inchoative. Cosmo is groovy. Cosmo is corrugated. Cosmo is anaplastic. Mohan is not inchoative. Mohan is not groovy. Mohan is pyramidal. Mohan is artesian. Mohan is anaplastic. Rich is groovy. Rich is pyramidal. Rich is artesian. Rich is corrugated. All groovy things are anaplastic. If Cherlyn is corrugated then Cherlyn is pathogenic. White things are pathogenic. If something is corrugated and not inchoative then it is not pathogenic. If something is anaplastic and not artesian then it is not groovy. Rough things are groovy. If Cherlyn is pyramidal then Cherlyn is anaplastic. If something is corrugated and anaplastic then it is pyramidal. Cherlyn is not groovy.", "logic": "\nPyramidal(cherlyn)\nArtesian(cherlyn)\nInchoative(cosmo)\nGroovy(cosmo)\nCorrugated(cosmo)\nAnaplastic(cosmo)\nnot Inchoative(mohan)\nnot Groovy(mohan)\nPyramidal(mohan)\nArtesian(mohan)\nAnaplastic(mohan)\nGroovy(rich)\nPyramidal(rich)\nArtesian(rich)\nCorrugated(rich)\nforall x (Groovy(x) -> Anaplastic(x))\nCorrugated(cherlyn) -> Pathogenic(cherlyn)\nforall x (Anaplastic(x) -> Pathogenic(x))\nforall x (Corrugated(x) and not Inchoative(x) -> not Pathogenic(x))\nforall x (Anaplastic(x) and not Artesian(x) -> not Groovy(x))\nforall x (Corrugated(x) -> Groovy(x))\nPyramidal(cherlyn) -> Anaplastic(cherlyn)\nforall x (Corrugated(x) and Anaplastic(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\n\nnot Groovy(cherlyn)\n\nforall x (Corrugated(x) -> Groovy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Collette is incorrect. Collette is untucked. Dante is adagio. Dante is shoddy. Dante is mature. Dante is parametric. Chelsy is not adagio. Chelsy is not shoddy. Chelsy is incorrect. Chelsy is untucked. Chelsy is parametric. Douglas is shoddy. Douglas is incorrect. Douglas is untucked. Douglas is mature. All shoddy things are parametric. If Collette is mature then Collette is minute. White things are minute. If something is mature and not adagio then it is not minute. If something is parametric and not untucked then it is not shoddy. Rough things are shoddy. If Collette is incorrect then Collette is parametric. If something is mature and parametric then it is incorrect. Douglas is adagio.", "logic": "\nIncorrect(collette)\nUntucked(collette)\nAdagio(dante)\nShoddy(dante)\nMature(dante)\nParametric(dante)\nnot Adagio(chelsy)\nnot Shoddy(chelsy)\nIncorrect(chelsy)\nUntucked(chelsy)\nParametric(chelsy)\nShoddy(douglas)\nIncorrect(douglas)\nUntucked(douglas)\nMature(douglas)\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> Parametric(x))\nMature(collette) -> Minute(collette)\nforall x (Parametric(x) -> Minute(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) and not Adagio(x) -> not Minute(x))\nforall x (Parametric(x) and not Untucked(x) -> not Shoddy(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) -> Shoddy(x))\nIncorrect(collette) -> Parametric(collette)\nforall x (Mature(x) and Parametric(x) -> Incorrect(x))\n\nAdagio(douglas)\n\nAdagio(douglas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Aylmer is delible. Aylmer is depressed. Winfield is firm. Winfield is bountied. Winfield is loth. Winfield is hoggish. Genni is not firm. Genni is not bountied. Genni is delible. Genni is depressed. Genni is hoggish. Lind is bountied. Lind is delible. Lind is depressed. Lind is loth. All bountied things are hoggish. If Aylmer is loth then Aylmer is penitent. White things are penitent. If something is loth and not firm then it is not penitent. If something is hoggish and not depressed then it is not bountied. Rough things are bountied. If Aylmer is delible then Aylmer is hoggish. If something is loth and hoggish then it is delible. Winfield is not depressed.", "logic": "\nDelible(aylmer)\nDepressed(aylmer)\nFirm(winfield)\nBountied(winfield)\nLoth(winfield)\nHoggish(winfield)\nnot Firm(genni)\nnot Bountied(genni)\nDelible(genni)\nDepressed(genni)\nHoggish(genni)\nBountied(lind)\nDelible(lind)\nDepressed(lind)\nLoth(lind)\nforall x (Bountied(x) -> Hoggish(x))\nLoth(aylmer) -> Penitent(aylmer)\nforall x (Hoggish(x) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Loth(x) and not Firm(x) -> not Penitent(x))\nforall x (Hoggish(x) and not Depressed(x) -> not Bountied(x))\nforall x (Loth(x) -> Bountied(x))\nDelible(aylmer) -> Hoggish(aylmer)\nforall x (Loth(x) and Hoggish(x) -> Delible(x))\n\nnot Depressed(winfield)\n\nnot Depressed(winfield) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Emmet is anile. Emmet is jingling. Blakelee is jellied. Blakelee is lepidote. Blakelee is veterinary. Blakelee is dateable. Leyla is not jellied. Leyla is not lepidote. Leyla is anile. Leyla is jingling. Leyla is dateable. Ruthanne is lepidote. Ruthanne is anile. Ruthanne is jingling. Ruthanne is veterinary. All lepidote things are dateable. If Emmet is veterinary then Emmet is eremitical. White things are eremitical. If something is veterinary and not jellied then it is not eremitical. If something is dateable and not jingling then it is not lepidote. Rough things are lepidote. If Emmet is anile then Emmet is dateable. If something is veterinary and dateable then it is anile. Leyla is veterinary.", "logic": "\nAnile(emmet)\nJingling(emmet)\nJellied(blakelee)\nLepidote(blakelee)\nVeterinary(blakelee)\nDateable(blakelee)\nnot Jellied(leyla)\nnot Lepidote(leyla)\nAnile(leyla)\nJingling(leyla)\nDateable(leyla)\nLepidote(ruthanne)\nAnile(ruthanne)\nJingling(ruthanne)\nVeterinary(ruthanne)\nforall x (Lepidote(x) -> Dateable(x))\nVeterinary(emmet) -> Eremitical(emmet)\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Eremitical(x))\nforall x (Veterinary(x) and not Jellied(x) -> not Eremitical(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) and not Jingling(x) -> not Lepidote(x))\nforall x (Veterinary(x) -> Lepidote(x))\nAnile(emmet) -> Dateable(emmet)\nforall x (Veterinary(x) and Dateable(x) -> Anile(x))\n\nVeterinary(leyla)\n\nVeterinary(leyla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Leopold is angulate. Leopold is deranged. Raoul is effeminate. Raoul is dehydrated. Raoul is hawkish. Raoul is atavistic. Denis is not effeminate. Denis is not dehydrated. Denis is angulate. Denis is deranged. Denis is atavistic. Tibold is dehydrated. Tibold is angulate. Tibold is deranged. Tibold is hawkish. All dehydrated things are atavistic. If Leopold is hawkish then Leopold is generative. White things are generative. If something is hawkish and not effeminate then it is not generative. If something is atavistic and not deranged then it is not dehydrated. Rough things are dehydrated. If Leopold is angulate then Leopold is atavistic. If something is hawkish and atavistic then it is angulate. Leopold is not effeminate.", "logic": "\nAngulate(leopold)\nDeranged(leopold)\nEffeminate(raoul)\nDehydrated(raoul)\nHawkish(raoul)\nAtavistic(raoul)\nnot Effeminate(denis)\nnot Dehydrated(denis)\nAngulate(denis)\nDeranged(denis)\nAtavistic(denis)\nDehydrated(tibold)\nAngulate(tibold)\nDeranged(tibold)\nHawkish(tibold)\nforall x (Dehydrated(x) -> Atavistic(x))\nHawkish(leopold) -> Generative(leopold)\nforall x (Atavistic(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and not Effeminate(x) -> not Generative(x))\nforall x (Atavistic(x) and not Deranged(x) -> not Dehydrated(x))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) -> Dehydrated(x))\nAngulate(leopold) -> Atavistic(leopold)\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and Atavistic(x) -> Angulate(x))\n\nnot Effeminate(leopold)\n\nnot Effeminate(leopold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Madison is wasted. Madison is vermicular. Isador is farsighted. Isador is wifely. Isador is pensive. Isador is milklike. Luigi is not farsighted. Luigi is not wifely. Luigi is wasted. Luigi is vermicular. Luigi is milklike. Huntley is wifely. Huntley is wasted. Huntley is vermicular. Huntley is pensive. All wifely things are milklike. If Madison is pensive then Madison is hardback. White things are hardback. If something is pensive and not farsighted then it is not hardback. If something is milklike and not vermicular then it is not wifely. Rough things are wifely. If Madison is wasted then Madison is milklike. If something is pensive and milklike then it is wasted. Madison is pensive.", "logic": "\nWasted(madison)\nVermicular(madison)\nFarsighted(isador)\nWifely(isador)\nPensive(isador)\nMilklike(isador)\nnot Farsighted(luigi)\nnot Wifely(luigi)\nWasted(luigi)\nVermicular(luigi)\nMilklike(luigi)\nWifely(huntley)\nWasted(huntley)\nVermicular(huntley)\nPensive(huntley)\nforall x (Wifely(x) -> Milklike(x))\nPensive(madison) -> Hardback(madison)\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Hardback(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) and not Farsighted(x) -> not Hardback(x))\nforall x (Milklike(x) and not Vermicular(x) -> not Wifely(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) -> Wifely(x))\nWasted(madison) -> Milklike(madison)\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Milklike(x) -> Wasted(x))\n\nPensive(madison)\n\nPensive(madison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-476"} {"premises": "Xymenes is nonionic. Xymenes is brickly. Kayla is kingly. Kayla is percipient. Renado is brickly. Hortensia is acinous. Hortensia is nonionic. Hortensia is kingly. Hortensia is brickly. Hortensia is deferent. Hortensia is percipient. Hortensia is addressed. All deferent, kingly people are nonionic. If someone is percipient and kingly then they are deferent. Hortensia is percipient.", "logic": "\nNonionic(xymenes)\nBrickly(xymenes)\nKingly(kayla)\nPercipient(kayla)\nBrickly(renado)\nAcinous(hortensia)\nNonionic(hortensia)\nKingly(hortensia)\nBrickly(hortensia)\nDeferent(hortensia)\nPercipient(hortensia)\nAddressed(hortensia)\nforall x (Deferent(x) and Kingly(x) -> Nonionic(x))\nforall x (Percipient(x) and Kingly(x) -> Deferent(x))\n\nPercipient(hortensia)\n\ntherefore Percipient(hortensia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Barby is saturated. Barby is overall. Kirsteni is unwritten. Kirsteni is salable. Charley is overall. Layne is marvelous. Layne is saturated. Layne is unwritten. Layne is overall. Layne is disjunct. Layne is salable. Layne is discalced. All disjunct, unwritten people are saturated. If someone is salable and unwritten then they are disjunct. Layne is not salable.", "logic": "\nSaturated(barby)\nOverall(barby)\nUnwritten(kirsteni)\nSalable(kirsteni)\nOverall(charley)\nMarvelous(layne)\nSaturated(layne)\nUnwritten(layne)\nOverall(layne)\nDisjunct(layne)\nSalable(layne)\nDiscalced(layne)\nforall x (Disjunct(x) and Unwritten(x) -> Saturated(x))\nforall x (Salable(x) and Unwritten(x) -> Disjunct(x))\n\nnot Salable(layne)\n\ntherefore Salable(layne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Quintin is anaclinal. Quintin is catching. Natty is prewar. Natty is clubby. Shaylyn is catching. Esmaria is crazed. Esmaria is anaclinal. Esmaria is prewar. Esmaria is catching. Esmaria is pilous. Esmaria is clubby. Esmaria is moonstruck. All pilous, prewar people are anaclinal. If someone is clubby and prewar then they are pilous. Natty is pilous.", "logic": "\nAnaclinal(quintin)\nCatching(quintin)\nPrewar(natty)\nClubby(natty)\nCatching(shaylyn)\nCrazed(esmaria)\nAnaclinal(esmaria)\nPrewar(esmaria)\nCatching(esmaria)\nPilous(esmaria)\nClubby(esmaria)\nMoonstruck(esmaria)\nforall x (Pilous(x) and Prewar(x) -> Anaclinal(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) and Prewar(x) -> Pilous(x))\n\nPilous(natty)\n\nClubby(natty) and Prewar(natty) and forall x (Clubby(x) and Prewar(x) -> Pilous(x)) -> therefore Pilous(natty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Morrie is finicky. Morrie is harmonic. Nathan is ephesian. Nathan is boring. Fonz is harmonic. Mirabel is bankable. Mirabel is finicky. Mirabel is ephesian. Mirabel is harmonic. Mirabel is trimotored. Mirabel is boring. Mirabel is revolting. All trimotored, ephesian people are finicky. If someone is boring and ephesian then they are trimotored. Nathan is not trimotored.", "logic": "\nFinicky(morrie)\nHarmonic(morrie)\nEphesian(nathan)\nBoring(nathan)\nHarmonic(fonz)\nBankable(mirabel)\nFinicky(mirabel)\nEphesian(mirabel)\nHarmonic(mirabel)\nTrimotored(mirabel)\nBoring(mirabel)\nRevolting(mirabel)\nforall x (Trimotored(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Finicky(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Trimotored(x))\n\nnot Trimotored(nathan)\n\nBoring(nathan) and Ephesian(nathan) and forall x (Boring(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Trimotored(x)) -> therefore Trimotored(nathan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Aviva is dated. Aviva is assumed. Marylee is muddied. Marylee is ameboid. Jillayne is assumed. Susana is perceptual. Susana is dated. Susana is muddied. Susana is assumed. Susana is catty. Susana is ameboid. Susana is unawed. All catty, muddied people are dated. If someone is ameboid and muddied then they are catty. Marylee is dated.", "logic": "\nDated(aviva)\nAssumed(aviva)\nMuddied(marylee)\nAmeboid(marylee)\nAssumed(jillayne)\nPerceptual(susana)\nDated(susana)\nMuddied(susana)\nAssumed(susana)\nCatty(susana)\nAmeboid(susana)\nUnawed(susana)\nforall x (Catty(x) and Muddied(x) -> Dated(x))\nforall x (Ameboid(x) and Muddied(x) -> Catty(x))\n\nDated(marylee)\n\nAmeboid(marylee) and Muddied(marylee) and forall x (Ameboid(x) and Muddied(x) -> Catty(x)) -> therefore Catty(marylee) Catty(marylee) and Muddied(marylee) and forall x (Catty(x) and Muddied(x) -> Dated(x)) -> therefore Dated(marylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Lizbeth is blameable. Lizbeth is holozoic. Belita is oncologic. Belita is untalented. Duane is holozoic. Collette is bacchanal. Collette is blameable. Collette is oncologic. Collette is holozoic. Collette is cropped. Collette is untalented. Collette is tudor. All cropped, oncologic people are blameable. If someone is untalented and oncologic then they are cropped. Belita is not blameable.", "logic": "\nBlameable(lizbeth)\nHolozoic(lizbeth)\nOncologic(belita)\nUntalented(belita)\nHolozoic(duane)\nBacchanal(collette)\nBlameable(collette)\nOncologic(collette)\nHolozoic(collette)\nCropped(collette)\nUntalented(collette)\nTudor(collette)\nforall x (Cropped(x) and Oncologic(x) -> Blameable(x))\nforall x (Untalented(x) and Oncologic(x) -> Cropped(x))\n\nnot Blameable(belita)\n\nUntalented(belita) and Oncologic(belita) and forall x (Untalented(x) and Oncologic(x) -> Cropped(x)) -> therefore Cropped(belita) Cropped(belita) and Oncologic(belita) and forall x (Cropped(x) and Oncologic(x) -> Blameable(x)) -> therefore Blameable(belita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Aziz is partizan. Aziz is maltese. Buffy is postural. Buffy is anoxic. Rogers is maltese. Flemming is autolytic. Flemming is partizan. Flemming is postural. Flemming is maltese. Flemming is variegated. Flemming is anoxic. Flemming is laid. All variegated, postural people are partizan. If someone is anoxic and postural then they are variegated. Rogers is not variegated.", "logic": "\nPartizan(aziz)\nMaltese(aziz)\nPostural(buffy)\nAnoxic(buffy)\nMaltese(rogers)\nAutolytic(flemming)\nPartizan(flemming)\nPostural(flemming)\nMaltese(flemming)\nVariegated(flemming)\nAnoxic(flemming)\nLaid(flemming)\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Postural(x) -> Partizan(x))\nforall x (Anoxic(x) and Postural(x) -> Variegated(x))\n\nnot Variegated(rogers)\n\nforall x (Anoxic(x) and Postural(x) -> Variegated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Dierdre is sissified. Dierdre is made. Claude is amazed. Claude is ashen. Caleb is made. Olag is outcaste. Olag is sissified. Olag is amazed. Olag is made. Olag is partizan. Olag is ashen. Olag is azimuthal. All partizan, amazed people are sissified. If someone is ashen and amazed then they are partizan. Dierdre is partizan.", "logic": "\nSissified(dierdre)\nMade(dierdre)\nAmazed(claude)\nAshen(claude)\nMade(caleb)\nOutcaste(olag)\nSissified(olag)\nAmazed(olag)\nMade(olag)\nPartizan(olag)\nAshen(olag)\nAzimuthal(olag)\nforall x (Partizan(x) and Amazed(x) -> Sissified(x))\nforall x (Ashen(x) and Amazed(x) -> Partizan(x))\n\nPartizan(dierdre)\n\nforall x (Ashen(x) and Amazed(x) -> Partizan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Aretha is unexcited. Aretha is avifaunal. Sibley is univocal. Sibley is effeminate. Sullivan is avifaunal. Corie is assertive. Corie is unexcited. Corie is univocal. Corie is avifaunal. Corie is iron. Corie is effeminate. Corie is guided. All iron, univocal people are unexcited. If someone is effeminate and univocal then they are iron. Sullivan is not unexcited.", "logic": "\nUnexcited(aretha)\nAvifaunal(aretha)\nUnivocal(sibley)\nEffeminate(sibley)\nAvifaunal(sullivan)\nAssertive(corie)\nUnexcited(corie)\nUnivocal(corie)\nAvifaunal(corie)\nIron(corie)\nEffeminate(corie)\nGuided(corie)\nforall x (Iron(x) and Univocal(x) -> Unexcited(x))\nforall x (Effeminate(x) and Univocal(x) -> Iron(x))\n\nnot Unexcited(sullivan)\n\nforall x (Iron(x) and Univocal(x) -> Unexcited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Rachele is eudemonic. Rachele is unlighted. Sonja is thankful. Sonja is brisk. Binny is unlighted. Cristal is gyral. Cristal is eudemonic. Cristal is thankful. Cristal is unlighted. Cristal is rightful. Cristal is brisk. Cristal is slavelike. All rightful, thankful people are eudemonic. If someone is brisk and thankful then they are rightful. Binny is thankful.", "logic": "\nEudemonic(rachele)\nUnlighted(rachele)\nThankful(sonja)\nBrisk(sonja)\nUnlighted(binny)\nGyral(cristal)\nEudemonic(cristal)\nThankful(cristal)\nUnlighted(cristal)\nRightful(cristal)\nBrisk(cristal)\nSlavelike(cristal)\nforall x (Rightful(x) and Thankful(x) -> Eudemonic(x))\nforall x (Brisk(x) and Thankful(x) -> Rightful(x))\n\nThankful(binny)\n\nThankful(binny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Marita is carven. Marita is toneless. Irving is muzzy. Irving is fingerlike. Wake is toneless. Ranna is anti. Ranna is carven. Ranna is muzzy. Ranna is toneless. Ranna is prejudiced. Ranna is fingerlike. Ranna is basophilic. All prejudiced, muzzy people are carven. If someone is fingerlike and muzzy then they are prejudiced. Marita is not basophilic.", "logic": "\nCarven(marita)\nToneless(marita)\nMuzzy(irving)\nFingerlike(irving)\nToneless(wake)\nAnti(ranna)\nCarven(ranna)\nMuzzy(ranna)\nToneless(ranna)\nPrejudiced(ranna)\nFingerlike(ranna)\nBasophilic(ranna)\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Carven(x))\nforall x (Fingerlike(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Prejudiced(x))\n\nnot Basophilic(marita)\n\nnot Basophilic(marita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Damian is uninviting. Damian is himalayan. Valry is nonlethal. Valry is singsong. Merrie is himalayan. Keely is vegetive. Keely is uninviting. Keely is nonlethal. Keely is himalayan. Keely is raunchy. Keely is singsong. Keely is baritone. All raunchy, nonlethal people are uninviting. If someone is singsong and nonlethal then they are raunchy. Damian is vegetive.", "logic": "\nUninviting(damian)\nHimalayan(damian)\nNonlethal(valry)\nSingsong(valry)\nHimalayan(merrie)\nVegetive(keely)\nUninviting(keely)\nNonlethal(keely)\nHimalayan(keely)\nRaunchy(keely)\nSingsong(keely)\nBaritone(keely)\nforall x (Raunchy(x) and Nonlethal(x) -> Uninviting(x))\nforall x (Singsong(x) and Nonlethal(x) -> Raunchy(x))\n\nVegetive(damian)\n\nVegetive(damian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-806"} {"premises": "Jason is nonpublic. Jason is not unbearable. Jason is winy. Jason is anthropoid. Harland is nonpublic. Harland is bahamian. Harland is bigger. Harland is winy. Harland is catamenial. Harland is anthropoid. All bahamian people are bigger. If Jason is winy then Jason is bahamian. Harland is winy.", "logic": "\nNonpublic(jason)\nnot Unbearable(jason)\nWiny(jason)\nAnthropoid(jason)\nNonpublic(harland)\nBahamian(harland)\nBigger(harland)\nWiny(harland)\nCatamenial(harland)\nAnthropoid(harland)\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Bigger(x))\nWiny(jason) -> Bahamian(jason)\n\nWiny(harland)\n\ntherefore Winy(harland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Edouard is regimental. Edouard is not chapleted. Edouard is aphaeretic. Edouard is cambodian. Bryana is regimental. Bryana is comfy. Bryana is papal. Bryana is aphaeretic. Bryana is confusable. Bryana is cambodian. All comfy people are papal. If Edouard is aphaeretic then Edouard is comfy. Edouard is not cambodian.", "logic": "\nRegimental(edouard)\nnot Chapleted(edouard)\nAphaeretic(edouard)\nCambodian(edouard)\nRegimental(bryana)\nComfy(bryana)\nPapal(bryana)\nAphaeretic(bryana)\nConfusable(bryana)\nCambodian(bryana)\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Papal(x))\nAphaeretic(edouard) -> Comfy(edouard)\n\nnot Cambodian(edouard)\n\ntherefore Cambodian(edouard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Alfred is epizoic. Alfred is not susurrous. Alfred is vegetative. Alfred is exhaustive. Terrence is epizoic. Terrence is rife. Terrence is myoid. Terrence is vegetative. Terrence is barbarous. Terrence is exhaustive. All rife people are myoid. If Alfred is vegetative then Alfred is rife. Alfred is rife.", "logic": "\nEpizoic(alfred)\nnot Susurrous(alfred)\nVegetative(alfred)\nExhaustive(alfred)\nEpizoic(terrence)\nRife(terrence)\nMyoid(terrence)\nVegetative(terrence)\nBarbarous(terrence)\nExhaustive(terrence)\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Myoid(x))\nVegetative(alfred) -> Rife(alfred)\n\nRife(alfred)\n\nVegetative(alfred) and Vegetative(alfred) -> Rife(alfred) -> therefore Rife(alfred)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Carlita is booming. Carlita is not tricky. Carlita is projected. Carlita is hygienical. Almira is booming. Almira is mortifying. Almira is lactating. Almira is projected. Almira is haemal. Almira is hygienical. All mortifying people are lactating. If Carlita is projected then Carlita is mortifying. Carlita is not mortifying.", "logic": "\nBooming(carlita)\nnot Tricky(carlita)\nProjected(carlita)\nHygienical(carlita)\nBooming(almira)\nMortifying(almira)\nLactating(almira)\nProjected(almira)\nHaemal(almira)\nHygienical(almira)\nforall x (Mortifying(x) -> Lactating(x))\nProjected(carlita) -> Mortifying(carlita)\n\nnot Mortifying(carlita)\n\nProjected(carlita) and Projected(carlita) -> Mortifying(carlita) -> therefore Mortifying(carlita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Keeley is upstair. Keeley is not underhand. Keeley is nutritious. Keeley is diabolical. Dov is upstair. Dov is subocean. Dov is algonquin. Dov is nutritious. Dov is pinstriped. Dov is diabolical. All subocean people are algonquin. If Keeley is nutritious then Keeley is subocean. Keeley is algonquin.", "logic": "\nUpstair(keeley)\nnot Underhand(keeley)\nNutritious(keeley)\nDiabolical(keeley)\nUpstair(dov)\nSubocean(dov)\nAlgonquin(dov)\nNutritious(dov)\nPinstriped(dov)\nDiabolical(dov)\nforall x (Subocean(x) -> Algonquin(x))\nNutritious(keeley) -> Subocean(keeley)\n\nAlgonquin(keeley)\n\nNutritious(keeley) and Nutritious(keeley) -> Subocean(keeley) -> therefore Subocean(keeley) Subocean(keeley) and forall x (Subocean(x) -> Algonquin(x)) -> therefore Algonquin(keeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Meta is best. Meta is not ineligible. Meta is nipponese. Meta is suited. Vivianna is best. Vivianna is transient. Vivianna is pokey. Vivianna is nipponese. Vivianna is lepidote. Vivianna is suited. All transient people are pokey. If Meta is nipponese then Meta is transient. Meta is not pokey.", "logic": "\nBest(meta)\nnot Ineligible(meta)\nNipponese(meta)\nSuited(meta)\nBest(vivianna)\nTransient(vivianna)\nPokey(vivianna)\nNipponese(vivianna)\nLepidote(vivianna)\nSuited(vivianna)\nforall x (Transient(x) -> Pokey(x))\nNipponese(meta) -> Transient(meta)\n\nnot Pokey(meta)\n\nNipponese(meta) and Nipponese(meta) -> Transient(meta) -> therefore Transient(meta) Transient(meta) and forall x (Transient(x) -> Pokey(x)) -> therefore Pokey(meta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Leonidas is gloveless. Leonidas is not awol. Leonidas is grey. Leonidas is vital. Talyah is gloveless. Talyah is peremptory. Talyah is barytic. Talyah is grey. Talyah is beaklike. Talyah is vital. All peremptory people are barytic. If Leonidas is grey then Leonidas is peremptory. Leonidas is not beaklike.", "logic": "\nGloveless(leonidas)\nnot Awol(leonidas)\nGrey(leonidas)\nVital(leonidas)\nGloveless(talyah)\nPeremptory(talyah)\nBarytic(talyah)\nGrey(talyah)\nBeaklike(talyah)\nVital(talyah)\nforall x (Peremptory(x) -> Barytic(x))\nGrey(leonidas) -> Peremptory(leonidas)\n\nnot Beaklike(leonidas)\n\nnot Beaklike(leonidas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Fazeel is sable. Fazeel is not dilatory. Fazeel is scalelike. Fazeel is cretinous. Noelani is sable. Noelani is sighted. Noelani is phony. Noelani is scalelike. Noelani is weatherly. Noelani is cretinous. All sighted people are phony. If Fazeel is scalelike then Fazeel is sighted. Noelani is dilatory.", "logic": "\nSable(fazeel)\nnot Dilatory(fazeel)\nScalelike(fazeel)\nCretinous(fazeel)\nSable(noelani)\nSighted(noelani)\nPhony(noelani)\nScalelike(noelani)\nWeatherly(noelani)\nCretinous(noelani)\nforall x (Sighted(x) -> Phony(x))\nScalelike(fazeel) -> Sighted(fazeel)\n\nDilatory(noelani)\n\nDilatory(noelani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The brad consent the reese. The brad begrime the reese. The brad is senecan. The brad is striking. The brad is ocher. The brad is mislaid. The brad is zygomatic. The brad savage the reese. The reese consent the brad. The reese begrime the brad. The reese is senecan. The reese is striking. The reese is ocher. The reese is zygomatic. The reese savage the brad. If something is ocher and it savage the brad then it consent the reese. If something is mislaid and striking then it savage the reese. If something savage the reese then the reese is senecan. If something begrime the reese then the reese savage the brad. If something begrime the reese and it consent the reese then the reese consent the brad. If something consent the reese then it savage the reese. If something consent the brad and it begrime the brad then it begrime the reese. If the reese begrime the brad then the brad is senecan. The brad consent the reese.", "logic": "\nConsent(brad, reese)\nBegrime(brad, reese)\nSenecan(brad)\nStriking(brad)\nOcher(brad)\nMislaid(brad)\nZygomatic(brad)\nSavage(brad, reese)\nConsent(reese, brad)\nBegrime(reese, brad)\nSenecan(reese)\nStriking(reese)\nOcher(reese)\nZygomatic(reese)\nSavage(reese, brad)\nforall x (Ocher(x) and Savage(x, brad) -> Consent(x, reese))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) and Striking(x) -> Savage(x, reese))\nforall x (Savage(x, reese) -> Senecan(reese))\nforall x (Begrime(x, reese) -> Savage(reese, brad))\nforall x (Begrime(x, reese) and Consent(x, reese) -> Consent(reese, brad))\nforall x (Consent(x, reese) -> Savage(x, reese))\nforall x (Consent(x, brad) and Begrime(x, brad) -> Begrime(x, reese))\nBegrime(reese, brad) -> Senecan(brad)\n\nConsent(brad, reese)\n\ntherefore Consent(brad, reese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The adara license the brynne. The adara ballyhoo the brynne. The adara is auricular. The adara is static. The adara is ultrasonic. The adara is nicaraguan. The adara is seething. The adara concretise the brynne. The brynne license the adara. The brynne ballyhoo the adara. The brynne is auricular. The brynne is static. The brynne is ultrasonic. The brynne is seething. The brynne concretise the adara. If something is ultrasonic and it concretise the adara then it license the brynne. If something is nicaraguan and static then it concretise the brynne. If something concretise the brynne then the brynne is auricular. If something ballyhoo the brynne then the brynne concretise the adara. If something ballyhoo the brynne and it license the brynne then the brynne license the adara. If something license the brynne then it concretise the brynne. If something license the adara and it ballyhoo the adara then it ballyhoo the brynne. If the brynne ballyhoo the adara then the adara is auricular. The adara is not ultrasonic.", "logic": "\nLicense(adara, brynne)\nBallyhoo(adara, brynne)\nAuricular(adara)\nStatic(adara)\nUltrasonic(adara)\nNicaraguan(adara)\nSeething(adara)\nConcretise(adara, brynne)\nLicense(brynne, adara)\nBallyhoo(brynne, adara)\nAuricular(brynne)\nStatic(brynne)\nUltrasonic(brynne)\nSeething(brynne)\nConcretise(brynne, adara)\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) and Concretise(x, adara) -> License(x, brynne))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) and Static(x) -> Concretise(x, brynne))\nforall x (Concretise(x, brynne) -> Auricular(brynne))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, brynne) -> Concretise(brynne, adara))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, brynne) and License(x, brynne) -> License(brynne, adara))\nforall x (License(x, brynne) -> Concretise(x, brynne))\nforall x (License(x, adara) and Ballyhoo(x, adara) -> Ballyhoo(x, brynne))\nBallyhoo(brynne, adara) -> Auricular(adara)\n\nnot Ultrasonic(adara)\n\ntherefore Ultrasonic(adara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The irwin mobilize the carmella. The irwin candle the carmella. The irwin is unconfused. The irwin is malcontent. The irwin is appressed. The irwin is maxi. The irwin is beltless. The irwin conglobe the carmella. The carmella mobilize the irwin. The carmella candle the irwin. The carmella is unconfused. The carmella is malcontent. The carmella is appressed. The carmella is beltless. The carmella conglobe the irwin. If something is appressed and it conglobe the irwin then it mobilize the carmella. If something is maxi and malcontent then it conglobe the carmella. If something conglobe the carmella then the carmella is unconfused. If something candle the carmella then the carmella conglobe the irwin. If something candle the carmella and it mobilize the carmella then the carmella mobilize the irwin. If something mobilize the carmella then it conglobe the carmella. If something mobilize the irwin and it candle the irwin then it candle the carmella. If the carmella candle the irwin then the irwin is unconfused. The carmella mobilize the carmella.", "logic": "\nMobilize(irwin, carmella)\nCandle(irwin, carmella)\nUnconfused(irwin)\nMalcontent(irwin)\nAppressed(irwin)\nMaxi(irwin)\nBeltless(irwin)\nConglobe(irwin, carmella)\nMobilize(carmella, irwin)\nCandle(carmella, irwin)\nUnconfused(carmella)\nMalcontent(carmella)\nAppressed(carmella)\nBeltless(carmella)\nConglobe(carmella, irwin)\nforall x (Appressed(x) and Conglobe(x, irwin) -> Mobilize(x, carmella))\nforall x (Maxi(x) and Malcontent(x) -> Conglobe(x, carmella))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, carmella) -> Unconfused(carmella))\nforall x (Candle(x, carmella) -> Conglobe(carmella, irwin))\nforall x (Candle(x, carmella) and Mobilize(x, carmella) -> Mobilize(carmella, irwin))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, carmella) -> Conglobe(x, carmella))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, irwin) and Candle(x, irwin) -> Candle(x, carmella))\nCandle(carmella, irwin) -> Unconfused(irwin)\n\nMobilize(carmella, carmella)\n\nAppressed(carmella) and Conglobe(carmella, irwin) and forall x (Appressed(x) and Conglobe(x, irwin) -> Mobilize(x, carmella)) -> therefore Mobilize(carmella, carmella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The pearla concoct the hillery. The pearla lisp the hillery. The pearla is tensional. The pearla is sluicing. The pearla is verdant. The pearla is retro. The pearla is algid. The pearla ladle the hillery. The hillery concoct the pearla. The hillery lisp the pearla. The hillery is tensional. The hillery is sluicing. The hillery is verdant. The hillery is algid. The hillery ladle the pearla. If something is verdant and it ladle the pearla then it concoct the hillery. If something is retro and sluicing then it ladle the hillery. If something ladle the hillery then the hillery is tensional. If something lisp the hillery then the hillery ladle the pearla. If something lisp the hillery and it concoct the hillery then the hillery concoct the pearla. If something concoct the hillery then it ladle the hillery. If something concoct the pearla and it lisp the pearla then it lisp the hillery. If the hillery lisp the pearla then the pearla is tensional. The hillery does not chase the hillery.", "logic": "\nConcoct(pearla, hillery)\nLisp(pearla, hillery)\nTensional(pearla)\nSluicing(pearla)\nVerdant(pearla)\nRetro(pearla)\nAlgid(pearla)\nLadle(pearla, hillery)\nConcoct(hillery, pearla)\nLisp(hillery, pearla)\nTensional(hillery)\nSluicing(hillery)\nVerdant(hillery)\nAlgid(hillery)\nLadle(hillery, pearla)\nforall x (Verdant(x) and Ladle(x, pearla) -> Concoct(x, hillery))\nforall x (Retro(x) and Sluicing(x) -> Ladle(x, hillery))\nforall x (Ladle(x, hillery) -> Tensional(hillery))\nforall x (Lisp(x, hillery) -> Ladle(hillery, pearla))\nforall x (Lisp(x, hillery) and Concoct(x, hillery) -> Concoct(hillery, pearla))\nforall x (Concoct(x, hillery) -> Ladle(x, hillery))\nforall x (Concoct(x, pearla) and Lisp(x, pearla) -> Lisp(x, hillery))\nLisp(hillery, pearla) -> Tensional(pearla)\n\nnot Concoct(hillery, hillery)\n\nVerdant(hillery) and Ladle(hillery, pearla) and forall x (Verdant(x) and Ladle(x, pearla) -> Concoct(x, hillery)) -> therefore Concoct(hillery, hillery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The ramonda frazzle the katalin. The ramonda avulse the katalin. The ramonda is foetid. The ramonda is chafed. The ramonda is ultimo. The ramonda is electoral. The ramonda is genovese. The ramonda home the katalin. The katalin frazzle the ramonda. The katalin avulse the ramonda. The katalin is foetid. The katalin is chafed. The katalin is ultimo. The katalin is genovese. The katalin home the ramonda. If something is ultimo and it home the ramonda then it frazzle the katalin. If something is electoral and chafed then it home the katalin. If something home the katalin then the katalin is foetid. If something avulse the katalin then the katalin home the ramonda. If something avulse the katalin and it frazzle the katalin then the katalin frazzle the ramonda. If something frazzle the katalin then it home the katalin. If something frazzle the ramonda and it avulse the ramonda then it avulse the katalin. If the katalin avulse the ramonda then the ramonda is foetid. The katalin home the katalin.", "logic": "\nFrazzle(ramonda, katalin)\nAvulse(ramonda, katalin)\nFoetid(ramonda)\nChafed(ramonda)\nUltimo(ramonda)\nElectoral(ramonda)\nGenovese(ramonda)\nHome(ramonda, katalin)\nFrazzle(katalin, ramonda)\nAvulse(katalin, ramonda)\nFoetid(katalin)\nChafed(katalin)\nUltimo(katalin)\nGenovese(katalin)\nHome(katalin, ramonda)\nforall x (Ultimo(x) and Home(x, ramonda) -> Frazzle(x, katalin))\nforall x (Electoral(x) and Chafed(x) -> Home(x, katalin))\nforall x (Home(x, katalin) -> Foetid(katalin))\nforall x (Avulse(x, katalin) -> Home(katalin, ramonda))\nforall x (Avulse(x, katalin) and Frazzle(x, katalin) -> Frazzle(katalin, ramonda))\nforall x (Frazzle(x, katalin) -> Home(x, katalin))\nforall x (Frazzle(x, ramonda) and Avulse(x, ramonda) -> Avulse(x, katalin))\nAvulse(katalin, ramonda) -> Foetid(ramonda)\n\nHome(katalin, katalin)\n\nUltimo(katalin) and Home(katalin, ramonda) and forall x (Ultimo(x) and Home(x, ramonda) -> Frazzle(x, katalin)) -> therefore Frazzle(katalin, katalin) Frazzle(katalin, katalin) and forall x (Frazzle(x, katalin) -> Home(x, katalin)) -> therefore Home(katalin, katalin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The faunie succour the shalom. The faunie pocket the shalom. The faunie is collected. The faunie is impure. The faunie is susurrant. The faunie is scythian. The faunie is sinless. The faunie malt the shalom. The shalom succour the faunie. The shalom pocket the faunie. The shalom is collected. The shalom is impure. The shalom is susurrant. The shalom is sinless. The shalom malt the faunie. If something is susurrant and it malt the faunie then it succour the shalom. If something is scythian and impure then it malt the shalom. If something malt the shalom then the shalom is collected. If something pocket the shalom then the shalom malt the faunie. If something pocket the shalom and it succour the shalom then the shalom succour the faunie. If something succour the shalom then it malt the shalom. If something succour the faunie and it pocket the faunie then it pocket the shalom. If the shalom pocket the faunie then the faunie is collected. The shalom does not like the shalom.", "logic": "\nSuccour(faunie, shalom)\nPocket(faunie, shalom)\nCollected(faunie)\nImpure(faunie)\nSusurrant(faunie)\nScythian(faunie)\nSinless(faunie)\nMalt(faunie, shalom)\nSuccour(shalom, faunie)\nPocket(shalom, faunie)\nCollected(shalom)\nImpure(shalom)\nSusurrant(shalom)\nSinless(shalom)\nMalt(shalom, faunie)\nforall x (Susurrant(x) and Malt(x, faunie) -> Succour(x, shalom))\nforall x (Scythian(x) and Impure(x) -> Malt(x, shalom))\nforall x (Malt(x, shalom) -> Collected(shalom))\nforall x (Pocket(x, shalom) -> Malt(shalom, faunie))\nforall x (Pocket(x, shalom) and Succour(x, shalom) -> Succour(shalom, faunie))\nforall x (Succour(x, shalom) -> Malt(x, shalom))\nforall x (Succour(x, faunie) and Pocket(x, faunie) -> Pocket(x, shalom))\nPocket(shalom, faunie) -> Collected(faunie)\n\nnot Malt(shalom, shalom)\n\nSusurrant(shalom) and Malt(shalom, faunie) and forall x (Susurrant(x) and Malt(x, faunie) -> Succour(x, shalom)) -> therefore Succour(shalom, shalom) Succour(shalom, shalom) and forall x (Succour(x, shalom) -> Malt(x, shalom)) -> therefore Malt(shalom, shalom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The chen scythe the sutton. The chen snicker the sutton. The chen is titular. The chen is marked. The chen is yearly. The chen is counter. The chen is monotonous. The chen trounce the sutton. The sutton scythe the chen. The sutton snicker the chen. The sutton is titular. The sutton is marked. The sutton is yearly. The sutton is monotonous. The sutton trounce the chen. If something is yearly and it trounce the chen then it scythe the sutton. If something is counter and marked then it trounce the sutton. If something trounce the sutton then the sutton is titular. If something snicker the sutton then the sutton trounce the chen. If something snicker the sutton and it scythe the sutton then the sutton scythe the chen. If something scythe the sutton then it trounce the sutton. If something scythe the chen and it snicker the chen then it snicker the sutton. If the sutton snicker the chen then the chen is titular. The chen does not chase the chen.", "logic": "\nScythe(chen, sutton)\nSnicker(chen, sutton)\nTitular(chen)\nMarked(chen)\nYearly(chen)\nCounter(chen)\nMonotonous(chen)\nTrounce(chen, sutton)\nScythe(sutton, chen)\nSnicker(sutton, chen)\nTitular(sutton)\nMarked(sutton)\nYearly(sutton)\nMonotonous(sutton)\nTrounce(sutton, chen)\nforall x (Yearly(x) and Trounce(x, chen) -> Scythe(x, sutton))\nforall x (Counter(x) and Marked(x) -> Trounce(x, sutton))\nforall x (Trounce(x, sutton) -> Titular(sutton))\nforall x (Snicker(x, sutton) -> Trounce(sutton, chen))\nforall x (Snicker(x, sutton) and Scythe(x, sutton) -> Scythe(sutton, chen))\nforall x (Scythe(x, sutton) -> Trounce(x, sutton))\nforall x (Scythe(x, chen) and Snicker(x, chen) -> Snicker(x, sutton))\nSnicker(sutton, chen) -> Titular(chen)\n\nnot Scythe(chen, chen)\n\nnot Scythe(chen, chen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The andra leer the colene. The andra butt the colene. The andra is trim. The andra is activating. The andra is animate. The andra is hispanic. The andra is priestly. The andra imbrue the colene. The colene leer the andra. The colene butt the andra. The colene is trim. The colene is activating. The colene is animate. The colene is priestly. The colene imbrue the andra. If something is animate and it imbrue the andra then it leer the colene. If something is hispanic and activating then it imbrue the colene. If something imbrue the colene then the colene is trim. If something butt the colene then the colene imbrue the andra. If something butt the colene and it leer the colene then the colene leer the andra. If something leer the colene then it imbrue the colene. If something leer the andra and it butt the andra then it butt the colene. If the colene butt the andra then the andra is trim. The andra butt the andra.", "logic": "\nLeer(andra, colene)\nButt(andra, colene)\nTrim(andra)\nActivating(andra)\nAnimate(andra)\nHispanic(andra)\nPriestly(andra)\nImbrue(andra, colene)\nLeer(colene, andra)\nButt(colene, andra)\nTrim(colene)\nActivating(colene)\nAnimate(colene)\nPriestly(colene)\nImbrue(colene, andra)\nforall x (Animate(x) and Imbrue(x, andra) -> Leer(x, colene))\nforall x (Hispanic(x) and Activating(x) -> Imbrue(x, colene))\nforall x (Imbrue(x, colene) -> Trim(colene))\nforall x (Butt(x, colene) -> Imbrue(colene, andra))\nforall x (Butt(x, colene) and Leer(x, colene) -> Leer(colene, andra))\nforall x (Leer(x, colene) -> Imbrue(x, colene))\nforall x (Leer(x, andra) and Butt(x, andra) -> Butt(x, colene))\nButt(colene, andra) -> Trim(andra)\n\nButt(andra, andra)\n\nButt(andra, andra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The levy subjoin the rayna. The levy require the rayna. The levy is uncousinly. The levy is basic. The levy is pediatric. The levy is untimely. The levy is greased. The levy specialize the rayna. The rayna subjoin the levy. The rayna require the levy. The rayna is uncousinly. The rayna is basic. The rayna is pediatric. The rayna is greased. The rayna specialize the levy. If something is pediatric and it specialize the levy then it subjoin the rayna. If something is untimely and basic then it specialize the rayna. If something specialize the rayna then the rayna is uncousinly. If something require the rayna then the rayna specialize the levy. If something require the rayna and it subjoin the rayna then the rayna subjoin the levy. If something subjoin the rayna then it specialize the rayna. If something subjoin the levy and it require the levy then it require the rayna. If the rayna require the levy then the levy is uncousinly. The levy does not like the levy.", "logic": "\nSubjoin(levy, rayna)\nRequire(levy, rayna)\nUncousinly(levy)\nBasic(levy)\nPediatric(levy)\nUntimely(levy)\nGreased(levy)\nSpecialize(levy, rayna)\nSubjoin(rayna, levy)\nRequire(rayna, levy)\nUncousinly(rayna)\nBasic(rayna)\nPediatric(rayna)\nGreased(rayna)\nSpecialize(rayna, levy)\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and Specialize(x, levy) -> Subjoin(x, rayna))\nforall x (Untimely(x) and Basic(x) -> Specialize(x, rayna))\nforall x (Specialize(x, rayna) -> Uncousinly(rayna))\nforall x (Require(x, rayna) -> Specialize(rayna, levy))\nforall x (Require(x, rayna) and Subjoin(x, rayna) -> Subjoin(rayna, levy))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, rayna) -> Specialize(x, rayna))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, levy) and Require(x, levy) -> Require(x, rayna))\nRequire(rayna, levy) -> Uncousinly(levy)\n\nnot Specialize(levy, levy)\n\nnot Specialize(levy, levy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The rici concrete the joete. The rici labour the joete. The rici is endocrinal. The rici is habitual. The rici is stone. The rici is scummy. The rici is neurotoxic. The rici whelm the joete. The joete concrete the rici. The joete labour the rici. The joete is endocrinal. The joete is habitual. The joete is stone. The joete is neurotoxic. The joete whelm the rici. If something is stone and it whelm the rici then it concrete the joete. If something is scummy and habitual then it whelm the joete. If something whelm the joete then the joete is endocrinal. If something labour the joete then the joete whelm the rici. If something labour the joete and it concrete the joete then the joete concrete the rici. If something concrete the joete then it whelm the joete. If something concrete the rici and it labour the rici then it labour the joete. If the joete labour the rici then the rici is endocrinal. The joete is scummy.", "logic": "\nConcrete(rici, joete)\nLabour(rici, joete)\nEndocrinal(rici)\nHabitual(rici)\nStone(rici)\nScummy(rici)\nNeurotoxic(rici)\nWhelm(rici, joete)\nConcrete(joete, rici)\nLabour(joete, rici)\nEndocrinal(joete)\nHabitual(joete)\nStone(joete)\nNeurotoxic(joete)\nWhelm(joete, rici)\nforall x (Stone(x) and Whelm(x, rici) -> Concrete(x, joete))\nforall x (Scummy(x) and Habitual(x) -> Whelm(x, joete))\nforall x (Whelm(x, joete) -> Endocrinal(joete))\nforall x (Labour(x, joete) -> Whelm(joete, rici))\nforall x (Labour(x, joete) and Concrete(x, joete) -> Concrete(joete, rici))\nforall x (Concrete(x, joete) -> Whelm(x, joete))\nforall x (Concrete(x, rici) and Labour(x, rici) -> Labour(x, joete))\nLabour(joete, rici) -> Endocrinal(rici)\n\nScummy(joete)\n\nScummy(joete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1051"} {"premises": "The lee does not chase the tobit. The lee bevel the praneetf. The lee ranch the jimbo. The lee ranch the praneetf. The lee is unfed. The jimbo ranch the lee. The jimbo is corporate. The tobit repeat the lee. The praneetf bevel the lee. The praneetf ranch the jimbo. If something is audacious then it repeat the praneetf. If something ranch the jimbo and it is not corporate then the jimbo bevel the lee. If something bevel the praneetf then it bevel the jimbo. If the tobit is labile and the tobit is not corporate then the tobit does not visit the jimbo. If something ranch the lee then it is audacious. If something repeat the jimbo then the jimbo is not audacious. The lee bevel the praneetf.", "logic": "\nnot Bevel(lee, tobit)\nBevel(lee, praneetf)\nRanch(lee, jimbo)\nRanch(lee, praneetf)\nUnfed(lee)\nRanch(jimbo, lee)\nCorporate(jimbo)\nRepeat(tobit, lee)\nBevel(praneetf, lee)\nRanch(praneetf, jimbo)\nforall x (Audacious(x) -> Repeat(x, praneetf))\nforall x (Ranch(x, jimbo) and not Corporate(x) -> Bevel(jimbo, lee))\nforall x (Bevel(x, praneetf) -> Bevel(x, jimbo))\nLabile(tobit) and not Corporate(tobit) -> not Repeat(tobit, jimbo)\nforall x (Ranch(x, lee) -> Audacious(x))\nforall x (Repeat(x, jimbo) -> not Audacious(jimbo))\n\nBevel(lee, praneetf)\n\ntherefore Bevel(lee, praneetf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The chandler does not chase the twila. The chandler saltate the ursula. The chandler esteem the sunshine. The chandler esteem the ursula. The chandler is underhung. The sunshine esteem the chandler. The sunshine is paying. The twila antedate the chandler. The ursula saltate the chandler. The ursula esteem the sunshine. If something is built then it antedate the ursula. If something esteem the sunshine and it is not paying then the sunshine saltate the chandler. If something saltate the ursula then it saltate the sunshine. If the twila is eastbound and the twila is not paying then the twila does not visit the sunshine. If something esteem the chandler then it is built. If something antedate the sunshine then the sunshine is not built. The ursula does not chase the chandler.", "logic": "\nnot Saltate(chandler, twila)\nSaltate(chandler, ursula)\nEsteem(chandler, sunshine)\nEsteem(chandler, ursula)\nUnderhung(chandler)\nEsteem(sunshine, chandler)\nPaying(sunshine)\nAntedate(twila, chandler)\nSaltate(ursula, chandler)\nEsteem(ursula, sunshine)\nforall x (Built(x) -> Antedate(x, ursula))\nforall x (Esteem(x, sunshine) and not Paying(x) -> Saltate(sunshine, chandler))\nforall x (Saltate(x, ursula) -> Saltate(x, sunshine))\nEastbound(twila) and not Paying(twila) -> not Antedate(twila, sunshine)\nforall x (Esteem(x, chandler) -> Built(x))\nforall x (Antedate(x, sunshine) -> not Built(sunshine))\n\nnot Saltate(ursula, chandler)\n\ntherefore Saltate(ursula, chandler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The rhianon does not chase the patience. The rhianon underquote the connor. The rhianon talk the jennings. The rhianon talk the connor. The rhianon is darkened. The jennings talk the rhianon. The jennings is lidless. The patience batfowl the rhianon. The connor underquote the rhianon. The connor talk the jennings. If something is antimonic then it batfowl the connor. If something talk the jennings and it is not lidless then the jennings underquote the rhianon. If something underquote the connor then it underquote the jennings. If the patience is dual and the patience is not lidless then the patience does not visit the jennings. If something talk the rhianon then it is antimonic. If something batfowl the jennings then the jennings is not antimonic. The rhianon underquote the jennings.", "logic": "\nnot Underquote(rhianon, patience)\nUnderquote(rhianon, connor)\nTalk(rhianon, jennings)\nTalk(rhianon, connor)\nDarkened(rhianon)\nTalk(jennings, rhianon)\nLidless(jennings)\nBatfowl(patience, rhianon)\nUnderquote(connor, rhianon)\nTalk(connor, jennings)\nforall x (Antimonic(x) -> Batfowl(x, connor))\nforall x (Talk(x, jennings) and not Lidless(x) -> Underquote(jennings, rhianon))\nforall x (Underquote(x, connor) -> Underquote(x, jennings))\nDual(patience) and not Lidless(patience) -> not Batfowl(patience, jennings)\nforall x (Talk(x, rhianon) -> Antimonic(x))\nforall x (Batfowl(x, jennings) -> not Antimonic(jennings))\n\nUnderquote(rhianon, jennings)\n\nUnderquote(rhianon, connor) and forall x (Underquote(x, connor) -> Underquote(x, jennings)) -> therefore Underquote(rhianon, jennings)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The vito does not chase the kalindi. The vito analogize the westleigh. The vito paint the jordanna. The vito paint the westleigh. The vito is crownless. The jordanna paint the vito. The jordanna is overfull. The kalindi swill the vito. The westleigh analogize the vito. The westleigh paint the jordanna. If something is imitative then it swill the westleigh. If something paint the jordanna and it is not overfull then the jordanna analogize the vito. If something analogize the westleigh then it analogize the jordanna. If the kalindi is abridged and the kalindi is not overfull then the kalindi does not visit the jordanna. If something paint the vito then it is imitative. If something swill the jordanna then the jordanna is not imitative. The vito does not chase the jordanna.", "logic": "\nnot Analogize(vito, kalindi)\nAnalogize(vito, westleigh)\nPaint(vito, jordanna)\nPaint(vito, westleigh)\nCrownless(vito)\nPaint(jordanna, vito)\nOverfull(jordanna)\nSwill(kalindi, vito)\nAnalogize(westleigh, vito)\nPaint(westleigh, jordanna)\nforall x (Imitative(x) -> Swill(x, westleigh))\nforall x (Paint(x, jordanna) and not Overfull(x) -> Analogize(jordanna, vito))\nforall x (Analogize(x, westleigh) -> Analogize(x, jordanna))\nAbridged(kalindi) and not Overfull(kalindi) -> not Swill(kalindi, jordanna)\nforall x (Paint(x, vito) -> Imitative(x))\nforall x (Swill(x, jordanna) -> not Imitative(jordanna))\n\nnot Analogize(vito, jordanna)\n\nAnalogize(vito, westleigh) and forall x (Analogize(x, westleigh) -> Analogize(x, jordanna)) -> therefore Analogize(vito, jordanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The claudette does not chase the westley. The claudette unwire the sherrie. The claudette mantle the rolph. The claudette mantle the sherrie. The claudette is dulcet. The rolph mantle the claudette. The rolph is barbellate. The westley foredoom the claudette. The sherrie unwire the claudette. The sherrie mantle the rolph. If something is inelastic then it foredoom the sherrie. If something mantle the rolph and it is not barbellate then the rolph unwire the claudette. If something unwire the sherrie then it unwire the rolph. If the westley is puerile and the westley is not barbellate then the westley does not visit the rolph. If something mantle the claudette then it is inelastic. If something foredoom the rolph then the rolph is not inelastic. The rolph foredoom the sherrie.", "logic": "\nnot Unwire(claudette, westley)\nUnwire(claudette, sherrie)\nMantle(claudette, rolph)\nMantle(claudette, sherrie)\nDulcet(claudette)\nMantle(rolph, claudette)\nBarbellate(rolph)\nForedoom(westley, claudette)\nUnwire(sherrie, claudette)\nMantle(sherrie, rolph)\nforall x (Inelastic(x) -> Foredoom(x, sherrie))\nforall x (Mantle(x, rolph) and not Barbellate(x) -> Unwire(rolph, claudette))\nforall x (Unwire(x, sherrie) -> Unwire(x, rolph))\nPuerile(westley) and not Barbellate(westley) -> not Foredoom(westley, rolph)\nforall x (Mantle(x, claudette) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Foredoom(x, rolph) -> not Inelastic(rolph))\n\nForedoom(rolph, sherrie)\n\nMantle(rolph, claudette) and forall x (Mantle(x, claudette) -> Inelastic(x)) -> therefore Inelastic(rolph) Inelastic(rolph) and forall x (Inelastic(x) -> Foredoom(x, sherrie)) -> therefore Foredoom(rolph, sherrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The rajeev does not chase the ailey. The rajeev disown the marianne. The rajeev adjure the franciska. The rajeev adjure the marianne. The rajeev is victorian. The franciska adjure the rajeev. The franciska is slanted. The ailey knot the rajeev. The marianne disown the rajeev. The marianne adjure the franciska. If something is arenaceous then it knot the marianne. If something adjure the franciska and it is not slanted then the franciska disown the rajeev. If something disown the marianne then it disown the franciska. If the ailey is orienting and the ailey is not slanted then the ailey does not visit the franciska. If something adjure the rajeev then it is arenaceous. If something knot the franciska then the franciska is not arenaceous. The franciska does not visit the marianne.", "logic": "\nnot Disown(rajeev, ailey)\nDisown(rajeev, marianne)\nAdjure(rajeev, franciska)\nAdjure(rajeev, marianne)\nVictorian(rajeev)\nAdjure(franciska, rajeev)\nSlanted(franciska)\nKnot(ailey, rajeev)\nDisown(marianne, rajeev)\nAdjure(marianne, franciska)\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) -> Knot(x, marianne))\nforall x (Adjure(x, franciska) and not Slanted(x) -> Disown(franciska, rajeev))\nforall x (Disown(x, marianne) -> Disown(x, franciska))\nOrienting(ailey) and not Slanted(ailey) -> not Knot(ailey, franciska)\nforall x (Adjure(x, rajeev) -> Arenaceous(x))\nforall x (Knot(x, franciska) -> not Arenaceous(franciska))\n\nnot Knot(franciska, marianne)\n\nAdjure(franciska, rajeev) and forall x (Adjure(x, rajeev) -> Arenaceous(x)) -> therefore Arenaceous(franciska) Arenaceous(franciska) and forall x (Arenaceous(x) -> Knot(x, marianne)) -> therefore Knot(franciska, marianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The trudey does not chase the karlotte. The trudey snooker the billie. The trudey show the peter. The trudey show the billie. The trudey is beaklike. The peter show the trudey. The peter is bungling. The karlotte reunify the trudey. The billie snooker the trudey. The billie show the peter. If something is valved then it reunify the billie. If something show the peter and it is not bungling then the peter snooker the trudey. If something snooker the billie then it snooker the peter. If the karlotte is bowelless and the karlotte is not bungling then the karlotte does not visit the peter. If something show the trudey then it is valved. If something reunify the peter then the peter is not valved. The trudey is not valved.", "logic": "\nnot Snooker(trudey, karlotte)\nSnooker(trudey, billie)\nShow(trudey, peter)\nShow(trudey, billie)\nBeaklike(trudey)\nShow(peter, trudey)\nBungling(peter)\nReunify(karlotte, trudey)\nSnooker(billie, trudey)\nShow(billie, peter)\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Reunify(x, billie))\nforall x (Show(x, peter) and not Bungling(x) -> Snooker(peter, trudey))\nforall x (Snooker(x, billie) -> Snooker(x, peter))\nBowelless(karlotte) and not Bungling(karlotte) -> not Reunify(karlotte, peter)\nforall x (Show(x, trudey) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Reunify(x, peter) -> not Valved(peter))\n\nnot Valved(trudey)\n\nforall x (Show(x, trudey) -> Valved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The hillary does not chase the leroy. The hillary peddle the helaina. The hillary pattern the lorena. The hillary pattern the helaina. The hillary is insolvent. The lorena pattern the hillary. The lorena is tremulous. The leroy overuse the hillary. The helaina peddle the hillary. The helaina pattern the lorena. If something is forgotten then it overuse the helaina. If something pattern the lorena and it is not tremulous then the lorena peddle the hillary. If something peddle the helaina then it peddle the lorena. If the leroy is thousandth and the leroy is not tremulous then the leroy does not visit the lorena. If something pattern the hillary then it is forgotten. If something overuse the lorena then the lorena is not forgotten. The helaina is forgotten.", "logic": "\nnot Peddle(hillary, leroy)\nPeddle(hillary, helaina)\nPattern(hillary, lorena)\nPattern(hillary, helaina)\nInsolvent(hillary)\nPattern(lorena, hillary)\nTremulous(lorena)\nOveruse(leroy, hillary)\nPeddle(helaina, hillary)\nPattern(helaina, lorena)\nforall x (Forgotten(x) -> Overuse(x, helaina))\nforall x (Pattern(x, lorena) and not Tremulous(x) -> Peddle(lorena, hillary))\nforall x (Peddle(x, helaina) -> Peddle(x, lorena))\nThousandth(leroy) and not Tremulous(leroy) -> not Overuse(leroy, lorena)\nforall x (Pattern(x, hillary) -> Forgotten(x))\nforall x (Overuse(x, lorena) -> not Forgotten(lorena))\n\nForgotten(helaina)\n\nforall x (Pattern(x, hillary) -> Forgotten(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The gertruda does not chase the katheryn. The gertruda burnish the crista. The gertruda dance the tedmund. The gertruda dance the crista. The gertruda is activating. The tedmund dance the gertruda. The tedmund is ablated. The katheryn derive the gertruda. The crista burnish the gertruda. The crista dance the tedmund. If something is monolithic then it derive the crista. If something dance the tedmund and it is not ablated then the tedmund burnish the gertruda. If something burnish the crista then it burnish the tedmund. If the katheryn is burdened and the katheryn is not ablated then the katheryn does not visit the tedmund. If something dance the gertruda then it is monolithic. If something derive the tedmund then the tedmund is not monolithic. The tedmund does not chase the gertruda.", "logic": "\nnot Burnish(gertruda, katheryn)\nBurnish(gertruda, crista)\nDance(gertruda, tedmund)\nDance(gertruda, crista)\nActivating(gertruda)\nDance(tedmund, gertruda)\nAblated(tedmund)\nDerive(katheryn, gertruda)\nBurnish(crista, gertruda)\nDance(crista, tedmund)\nforall x (Monolithic(x) -> Derive(x, crista))\nforall x (Dance(x, tedmund) and not Ablated(x) -> Burnish(tedmund, gertruda))\nforall x (Burnish(x, crista) -> Burnish(x, tedmund))\nBurdened(katheryn) and not Ablated(katheryn) -> not Derive(katheryn, tedmund)\nforall x (Dance(x, gertruda) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Derive(x, tedmund) -> not Monolithic(tedmund))\n\nnot Burnish(tedmund, gertruda)\n\nforall x (Dance(x, tedmund) and not Ablated(x) -> Burnish(tedmund, gertruda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The herve does not chase the judith. The herve teethe the lani. The herve towel the marcos. The herve towel the lani. The herve is faced. The marcos towel the herve. The marcos is cerise. The judith border the herve. The lani teethe the herve. The lani towel the marcos. If something is pasted then it border the lani. If something towel the marcos and it is not cerise then the marcos teethe the herve. If something teethe the lani then it teethe the marcos. If the judith is dubious and the judith is not cerise then the judith does not visit the marcos. If something towel the herve then it is pasted. If something border the marcos then the marcos is not pasted. The judith towel the lani.", "logic": "\nnot Teethe(herve, judith)\nTeethe(herve, lani)\nTowel(herve, marcos)\nTowel(herve, lani)\nFaced(herve)\nTowel(marcos, herve)\nCerise(marcos)\nBorder(judith, herve)\nTeethe(lani, herve)\nTowel(lani, marcos)\nforall x (Pasted(x) -> Border(x, lani))\nforall x (Towel(x, marcos) and not Cerise(x) -> Teethe(marcos, herve))\nforall x (Teethe(x, lani) -> Teethe(x, marcos))\nDubious(judith) and not Cerise(judith) -> not Border(judith, marcos)\nforall x (Towel(x, herve) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Border(x, marcos) -> not Pasted(marcos))\n\nTowel(judith, lani)\n\nTowel(judith, lani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The louisette does not chase the chastity. The louisette motorise the josiah. The louisette exempt the merola. The louisette exempt the josiah. The louisette is flagging. The merola exempt the louisette. The merola is financial. The chastity chart the louisette. The josiah motorise the louisette. The josiah exempt the merola. If something is albitic then it chart the josiah. If something exempt the merola and it is not financial then the merola motorise the louisette. If something motorise the josiah then it motorise the merola. If the chastity is moot and the chastity is not financial then the chastity does not visit the merola. If something exempt the louisette then it is albitic. If something chart the merola then the merola is not albitic. The louisette is not financial.", "logic": "\nnot Motorise(louisette, chastity)\nMotorise(louisette, josiah)\nExempt(louisette, merola)\nExempt(louisette, josiah)\nFlagging(louisette)\nExempt(merola, louisette)\nFinancial(merola)\nChart(chastity, louisette)\nMotorise(josiah, louisette)\nExempt(josiah, merola)\nforall x (Albitic(x) -> Chart(x, josiah))\nforall x (Exempt(x, merola) and not Financial(x) -> Motorise(merola, louisette))\nforall x (Motorise(x, josiah) -> Motorise(x, merola))\nMoot(chastity) and not Financial(chastity) -> not Chart(chastity, merola)\nforall x (Exempt(x, louisette) -> Albitic(x))\nforall x (Chart(x, merola) -> not Albitic(merola))\n\nnot Financial(louisette)\n\nnot Financial(louisette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The kerianne does not chase the bekki. The kerianne capitalise the carmine. The kerianne duck the reggis. The kerianne duck the carmine. The kerianne is avascular. The reggis duck the kerianne. The reggis is voluted. The bekki osculate the kerianne. The carmine capitalise the kerianne. The carmine duck the reggis. If something is deaf then it osculate the carmine. If something duck the reggis and it is not voluted then the reggis capitalise the kerianne. If something capitalise the carmine then it capitalise the reggis. If the bekki is lipotropic and the bekki is not voluted then the bekki does not visit the reggis. If something duck the kerianne then it is deaf. If something osculate the reggis then the reggis is not deaf. The bekki is voluted.", "logic": "\nnot Capitalise(kerianne, bekki)\nCapitalise(kerianne, carmine)\nDuck(kerianne, reggis)\nDuck(kerianne, carmine)\nAvascular(kerianne)\nDuck(reggis, kerianne)\nVoluted(reggis)\nOsculate(bekki, kerianne)\nCapitalise(carmine, kerianne)\nDuck(carmine, reggis)\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Osculate(x, carmine))\nforall x (Duck(x, reggis) and not Voluted(x) -> Capitalise(reggis, kerianne))\nforall x (Capitalise(x, carmine) -> Capitalise(x, reggis))\nLipotropic(bekki) and not Voluted(bekki) -> not Osculate(bekki, reggis)\nforall x (Duck(x, kerianne) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Osculate(x, reggis) -> not Deaf(reggis))\n\nVoluted(bekki)\n\nVoluted(bekki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Teresa is refractile. Teresa is oligarchic. Emmey is not hewn. Tudor is not hewn. Tudor is not beneficial. Tudor is oligarchic. Hadleigh is uninformed. All hewn things are not uninformed. If something is refractile then it is hewn. Tudor is not beneficial.", "logic": "\nRefractile(teresa)\nOligarchic(teresa)\nnot Hewn(emmey)\nnot Hewn(tudor)\nnot Beneficial(tudor)\nOligarchic(tudor)\nUninformed(hadleigh)\nforall x (Hewn(x) -> not Uninformed(x))\nforall x (Refractile(x) -> Hewn(x))\n\nnot Beneficial(tudor)\n\ntherefore not Beneficial(tudor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Jacques is trilingual. Jacques is magyar. Megen is not wrecked. Edyth is not wrecked. Edyth is not canned. Edyth is magyar. Sidonia is preserved. All wrecked things are not preserved. If something is trilingual then it is wrecked. Sidonia is not preserved.", "logic": "\nTrilingual(jacques)\nMagyar(jacques)\nnot Wrecked(megen)\nnot Wrecked(edyth)\nnot Canned(edyth)\nMagyar(edyth)\nPreserved(sidonia)\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> not Preserved(x))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) -> Wrecked(x))\n\nnot Preserved(sidonia)\n\ntherefore Preserved(sidonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Minerva is apologetic. Minerva is samoan. Ivette is not clarion. Cori is not clarion. Cori is not optative. Cori is samoan. Melloney is bicornuate. All clarion things are not bicornuate. If something is apologetic then it is clarion. Minerva is clarion.", "logic": "\nApologetic(minerva)\nSamoan(minerva)\nnot Clarion(ivette)\nnot Clarion(cori)\nnot Optative(cori)\nSamoan(cori)\nBicornuate(melloney)\nforall x (Clarion(x) -> not Bicornuate(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Clarion(x))\n\nClarion(minerva)\n\nApologetic(minerva) and forall x (Apologetic(x) -> Clarion(x)) -> therefore Clarion(minerva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Peggie is lingual. Peggie is earthbound. Maxwell is not unused. Harland is not unused. Harland is not sloping. Harland is earthbound. Torey is untracked. All unused things are not untracked. If something is lingual then it is unused. Peggie is not unused.", "logic": "\nLingual(peggie)\nEarthbound(peggie)\nnot Unused(maxwell)\nnot Unused(harland)\nnot Sloping(harland)\nEarthbound(harland)\nUntracked(torey)\nforall x (Unused(x) -> not Untracked(x))\nforall x (Lingual(x) -> Unused(x))\n\nnot Unused(peggie)\n\nLingual(peggie) and forall x (Lingual(x) -> Unused(x)) -> therefore Unused(peggie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Elisha is oldish. Elisha is heavyset. Page is not pretended. Hanna is not pretended. Hanna is not ambagious. Hanna is heavyset. Rianon is respectful. All pretended things are not respectful. If something is oldish then it is pretended. Elisha is not respectful.", "logic": "\nOldish(elisha)\nHeavyset(elisha)\nnot Pretended(page)\nnot Pretended(hanna)\nnot Ambagious(hanna)\nHeavyset(hanna)\nRespectful(rianon)\nforall x (Pretended(x) -> not Respectful(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) -> Pretended(x))\n\nnot Respectful(elisha)\n\nOldish(elisha) and forall x (Oldish(x) -> Pretended(x)) -> therefore Pretended(elisha) Pretended(elisha) and forall x (Pretended(x) -> not Respectful(x)) -> therefore not Respectful(elisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Allie is showy. Allie is thankful. Sydney is not centered. Pat is not centered. Pat is not calendered. Pat is thankful. Wayland is phrenetic. All centered things are not phrenetic. If something is showy then it is centered. Allie is phrenetic.", "logic": "\nShowy(allie)\nThankful(allie)\nnot Centered(sydney)\nnot Centered(pat)\nnot Calendered(pat)\nThankful(pat)\nPhrenetic(wayland)\nforall x (Centered(x) -> not Phrenetic(x))\nforall x (Showy(x) -> Centered(x))\n\nPhrenetic(allie)\n\nShowy(allie) and forall x (Showy(x) -> Centered(x)) -> therefore Centered(allie) Centered(allie) and forall x (Centered(x) -> not Phrenetic(x)) -> therefore not Phrenetic(allie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Sampson is doped. Sampson is rheumy. Dwight is not corrupted. Werner is not corrupted. Werner is not louche. Werner is rheumy. Jordy is burly. All corrupted things are not burly. If something is doped then it is corrupted. Jordy is not corrupted.", "logic": "\nDoped(sampson)\nRheumy(sampson)\nnot Corrupted(dwight)\nnot Corrupted(werner)\nnot Louche(werner)\nRheumy(werner)\nBurly(jordy)\nforall x (Corrupted(x) -> not Burly(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Corrupted(x))\n\nnot Corrupted(jordy)\n\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Corrupted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Lizbeth is violative. Lizbeth is stupefied. Milka is not fighting. Gabrielle is not fighting. Gabrielle is not meaningful. Gabrielle is stupefied. Wendeline is heterodox. All fighting things are not heterodox. If something is violative then it is fighting. Gabrielle is heterodox.", "logic": "\nViolative(lizbeth)\nStupefied(lizbeth)\nnot Fighting(milka)\nnot Fighting(gabrielle)\nnot Meaningful(gabrielle)\nStupefied(gabrielle)\nHeterodox(wendeline)\nforall x (Fighting(x) -> not Heterodox(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) -> Fighting(x))\n\nHeterodox(gabrielle)\n\nHeterodox(gabrielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Quincey is deckled. Quincey is xxiv. Aubry is not agog. Jodie is not agog. Jodie is not warring. Jodie is xxiv. Jessica is assaultive. All agog things are not assaultive. If something is deckled then it is agog. Aubry is not deckled.", "logic": "\nDeckled(quincey)\nXxiv(quincey)\nnot Agog(aubry)\nnot Agog(jodie)\nnot Warring(jodie)\nXxiv(jodie)\nAssaultive(jessica)\nforall x (Agog(x) -> not Assaultive(x))\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Agog(x))\n\nnot Deckled(aubry)\n\nnot Deckled(aubry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Melody is peaceable. Melody is pulpy. Luanna is not glazed. Aleta is not glazed. Aleta is not conjugate. Aleta is pulpy. Kamilah is guileful. All glazed things are not guileful. If something is peaceable then it is glazed. Aleta is peaceable.", "logic": "\nPeaceable(melody)\nPulpy(melody)\nnot Glazed(luanna)\nnot Glazed(aleta)\nnot Conjugate(aleta)\nPulpy(aleta)\nGuileful(kamilah)\nforall x (Glazed(x) -> not Guileful(x))\nforall x (Peaceable(x) -> Glazed(x))\n\nPeaceable(aleta)\n\nPeaceable(aleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Alfie is sleepy. Alfie is fleecy. Winna is not stoned. Alidia is not stoned. Alidia is not spread. Alidia is fleecy. Harmonia is frenetic. All stoned things are not frenetic. If something is sleepy then it is stoned. Winna is not frenetic.", "logic": "\nSleepy(alfie)\nFleecy(alfie)\nnot Stoned(winna)\nnot Stoned(alidia)\nnot Spread(alidia)\nFleecy(alidia)\nFrenetic(harmonia)\nforall x (Stoned(x) -> not Frenetic(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) -> Stoned(x))\n\nnot Frenetic(winna)\n\nnot Frenetic(winna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Rhetta is unionized. Rhetta is coexisting. Weber is not cuneate. Alvinia is not cuneate. Alvinia is not unrevealed. Alvinia is coexisting. Jessalin is fulsome. All cuneate things are not fulsome. If something is unionized then it is cuneate. Jessalin is unionized.", "logic": "\nUnionized(rhetta)\nCoexisting(rhetta)\nnot Cuneate(weber)\nnot Cuneate(alvinia)\nnot Unrevealed(alvinia)\nCoexisting(alvinia)\nFulsome(jessalin)\nforall x (Cuneate(x) -> not Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Unionized(x) -> Cuneate(x))\n\nUnionized(jessalin)\n\nUnionized(jessalin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2200"} {"premises": "Emmet is covered. Emmet is pastel. Emmet is sparkling. Rosanne is covered. Rosanne is shameless. Rosanne is sparkling. Rosanne is goateed. If Rosanne is shameless then Rosanne is covered. All covered things are vehement. If Emmet is vehement and Emmet is sparkling then Emmet is spangly. Emmet is sparkling.", "logic": "\nCovered(emmet)\nPastel(emmet)\nSparkling(emmet)\nCovered(rosanne)\nShameless(rosanne)\nSparkling(rosanne)\nGoateed(rosanne)\nShameless(rosanne) -> Covered(rosanne)\nforall x (Covered(x) -> Vehement(x))\nVehement(emmet) and Sparkling(emmet) -> Spangly(emmet)\n\nSparkling(emmet)\n\ntherefore Sparkling(emmet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Ursola is amnestic. Ursola is activating. Ursola is pretorial. Bayard is amnestic. Bayard is anginal. Bayard is pretorial. Bayard is hornless. If Bayard is anginal then Bayard is amnestic. All amnestic things are potential. If Ursola is potential and Ursola is pretorial then Ursola is vulgar. Bayard is not anginal.", "logic": "\nAmnestic(ursola)\nActivating(ursola)\nPretorial(ursola)\nAmnestic(bayard)\nAnginal(bayard)\nPretorial(bayard)\nHornless(bayard)\nAnginal(bayard) -> Amnestic(bayard)\nforall x (Amnestic(x) -> Potential(x))\nPotential(ursola) and Pretorial(ursola) -> Vulgar(ursola)\n\nnot Anginal(bayard)\n\ntherefore Anginal(bayard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Simmonds is catchpenny. Simmonds is antimonial. Simmonds is taunting. Perry is catchpenny. Perry is repeated. Perry is taunting. Perry is unpopular. If Perry is repeated then Perry is catchpenny. All catchpenny things are semiliquid. If Simmonds is semiliquid and Simmonds is taunting then Simmonds is alarmed. Simmonds is semiliquid.", "logic": "\nCatchpenny(simmonds)\nAntimonial(simmonds)\nTaunting(simmonds)\nCatchpenny(perry)\nRepeated(perry)\nTaunting(perry)\nUnpopular(perry)\nRepeated(perry) -> Catchpenny(perry)\nforall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\nSemiliquid(simmonds) and Taunting(simmonds) -> Alarmed(simmonds)\n\nSemiliquid(simmonds)\n\nCatchpenny(simmonds) and forall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Semiliquid(x)) -> therefore Semiliquid(simmonds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Francoise is repelling. Francoise is overloaded. Francoise is provisory. Dinny is repelling. Dinny is overloaded. Dinny is provisory. Dinny is animist. If Dinny is overloaded then Dinny is repelling. All repelling things are endogenic. If Francoise is endogenic and Francoise is provisory then Francoise is ahorseback. Dinny is not endogenic.", "logic": "\nRepelling(francoise)\nOverloaded(francoise)\nProvisory(francoise)\nRepelling(dinny)\nOverloaded(dinny)\nProvisory(dinny)\nAnimist(dinny)\nOverloaded(dinny) -> Repelling(dinny)\nforall x (Repelling(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nEndogenic(francoise) and Provisory(francoise) -> Ahorseback(francoise)\n\nnot Endogenic(dinny)\n\nRepelling(dinny) and forall x (Repelling(x) -> Endogenic(x)) -> therefore Endogenic(dinny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Lynnelle is steaming. Lynnelle is granted. Lynnelle is panicked. Jonny is steaming. Jonny is lusty. Jonny is panicked. Jonny is amort. If Jonny is lusty then Jonny is steaming. All steaming things are weakening. If Lynnelle is weakening and Lynnelle is panicked then Lynnelle is pinnated. Lynnelle is pinnated.", "logic": "\nSteaming(lynnelle)\nGranted(lynnelle)\nPanicked(lynnelle)\nSteaming(jonny)\nLusty(jonny)\nPanicked(jonny)\nAmort(jonny)\nLusty(jonny) -> Steaming(jonny)\nforall x (Steaming(x) -> Weakening(x))\nWeakening(lynnelle) and Panicked(lynnelle) -> Pinnated(lynnelle)\n\nPinnated(lynnelle)\n\nSteaming(lynnelle) and forall x (Steaming(x) -> Weakening(x)) -> therefore Weakening(lynnelle) Weakening(lynnelle) and Panicked(lynnelle) and Weakening(lynnelle) and Panicked(lynnelle) -> Pinnated(lynnelle) -> therefore Pinnated(lynnelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Elyse is private. Elyse is shrewd. Elyse is draconian. Bella is private. Bella is modified. Bella is draconian. Bella is voltaic. If Bella is modified then Bella is private. All private things are estuarine. If Elyse is estuarine and Elyse is draconian then Elyse is defunct. Elyse is not defunct.", "logic": "\nPrivate(elyse)\nShrewd(elyse)\nDraconian(elyse)\nPrivate(bella)\nModified(bella)\nDraconian(bella)\nVoltaic(bella)\nModified(bella) -> Private(bella)\nforall x (Private(x) -> Estuarine(x))\nEstuarine(elyse) and Draconian(elyse) -> Defunct(elyse)\n\nnot Defunct(elyse)\n\nPrivate(elyse) and forall x (Private(x) -> Estuarine(x)) -> therefore Estuarine(elyse) Estuarine(elyse) and Draconian(elyse) and Estuarine(elyse) and Draconian(elyse) -> Defunct(elyse) -> therefore Defunct(elyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Renate is delightful. Renate is lowborn. Renate is organismic. Thor is delightful. Thor is factitious. Thor is organismic. Thor is spurious. If Thor is factitious then Thor is delightful. All delightful things are hesitating. If Renate is hesitating and Renate is organismic then Renate is untested. Renate is not spurious.", "logic": "\nDelightful(renate)\nLowborn(renate)\nOrganismic(renate)\nDelightful(thor)\nFactitious(thor)\nOrganismic(thor)\nSpurious(thor)\nFactitious(thor) -> Delightful(thor)\nforall x (Delightful(x) -> Hesitating(x))\nHesitating(renate) and Organismic(renate) -> Untested(renate)\n\nnot Spurious(renate)\n\nnot Spurious(renate) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Brandise is splashed. Brandise is archean. Brandise is affecting. Roby is splashed. Roby is sintered. Roby is affecting. Roby is found. If Roby is sintered then Roby is splashed. All splashed things are tudor. If Brandise is tudor and Brandise is affecting then Brandise is dainty. Roby is archean.", "logic": "\nSplashed(brandise)\nArchean(brandise)\nAffecting(brandise)\nSplashed(roby)\nSintered(roby)\nAffecting(roby)\nFound(roby)\nSintered(roby) -> Splashed(roby)\nforall x (Splashed(x) -> Tudor(x))\nTudor(brandise) and Affecting(brandise) -> Dainty(brandise)\n\nArchean(roby)\n\nArchean(roby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Theressa is naiant. Theressa is niffy. Theressa is localized. Palmer is naiant. Palmer is hallowed. Palmer is localized. Palmer is verbose. If Palmer is hallowed then Palmer is naiant. All naiant things are uncharged. If Theressa is uncharged and Theressa is localized then Theressa is norse. Palmer is not norse.", "logic": "\nNaiant(theressa)\nNiffy(theressa)\nLocalized(theressa)\nNaiant(palmer)\nHallowed(palmer)\nLocalized(palmer)\nVerbose(palmer)\nHallowed(palmer) -> Naiant(palmer)\nforall x (Naiant(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nUncharged(theressa) and Localized(theressa) -> Norse(theressa)\n\nnot Norse(palmer)\n\nnot Norse(palmer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Minny is bipolar. Minny is condolent. Minny is pastel. Dolley is bipolar. Dolley is maniacal. Dolley is pastel. Dolley is childish. If Dolley is maniacal then Dolley is bipolar. All bipolar things are toasted. If Minny is toasted and Minny is pastel then Minny is islamic. Minny is maniacal.", "logic": "\nBipolar(minny)\nCondolent(minny)\nPastel(minny)\nBipolar(dolley)\nManiacal(dolley)\nPastel(dolley)\nChildish(dolley)\nManiacal(dolley) -> Bipolar(dolley)\nforall x (Bipolar(x) -> Toasted(x))\nToasted(minny) and Pastel(minny) -> Islamic(minny)\n\nManiacal(minny)\n\nManiacal(minny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-883"} {"premises": "Parry is wilted. Brit is discovered. Sonnie is indigo. Silvana is cosmogenic. If Silvana is cosmogenic and Silvana is not indigo then Silvana is centrical. If Silvana is treeless then Silvana is pandurate. If someone is wilted then they are pandurate. If someone is indigo and discovered then they are pandurate. Kind people are wilted. All discovered people are wilted. Big, indigo people are treeless. If Sonnie is indigo and Sonnie is discovered then Sonnie is not centrical. Silvana is cosmogenic.", "logic": "\nWilted(parry)\nDiscovered(brit)\nIndigo(sonnie)\nCosmogenic(silvana)\nCosmogenic(silvana) and not Indigo(silvana) -> Centrical(silvana)\nTreeless(silvana) -> Pandurate(silvana)\nforall x (Wilted(x) -> Pandurate(x))\nforall x (Indigo(x) and Discovered(x) -> Pandurate(x))\nforall x (Discovered(x) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Discovered(x) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Wilted(x) and Indigo(x) -> Treeless(x))\nIndigo(sonnie) and Discovered(sonnie) -> not Centrical(sonnie)\n\nCosmogenic(silvana)\n\ntherefore Cosmogenic(silvana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Gwendolin is biographic. Mellissa is mucosal. Brunhilde is adhesive. Zilvia is surmounted. If Zilvia is surmounted and Zilvia is not adhesive then Zilvia is cloudy. If Zilvia is flabby then Zilvia is ascendent. If someone is biographic then they are ascendent. If someone is adhesive and mucosal then they are ascendent. Kind people are biographic. All mucosal people are biographic. Big, adhesive people are flabby. If Brunhilde is adhesive and Brunhilde is mucosal then Brunhilde is not cloudy. Mellissa is not mucosal.", "logic": "\nBiographic(gwendolin)\nMucosal(mellissa)\nAdhesive(brunhilde)\nSurmounted(zilvia)\nSurmounted(zilvia) and not Adhesive(zilvia) -> Cloudy(zilvia)\nFlabby(zilvia) -> Ascendent(zilvia)\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Ascendent(x))\nforall x (Adhesive(x) and Mucosal(x) -> Ascendent(x))\nforall x (Mucosal(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Mucosal(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) and Adhesive(x) -> Flabby(x))\nAdhesive(brunhilde) and Mucosal(brunhilde) -> not Cloudy(brunhilde)\n\nnot Mucosal(mellissa)\n\ntherefore Mucosal(mellissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Tori is languid. Rusty is teenaged. Pace is ataraxic. Tiffanie is arguable. If Tiffanie is arguable and Tiffanie is not ataraxic then Tiffanie is toothless. If Tiffanie is mammoth then Tiffanie is amoebic. If someone is languid then they are amoebic. If someone is ataraxic and teenaged then they are amoebic. Kind people are languid. All teenaged people are languid. Big, ataraxic people are mammoth. If Pace is ataraxic and Pace is teenaged then Pace is not toothless. Tori is amoebic.", "logic": "\nLanguid(tori)\nTeenaged(rusty)\nAtaraxic(pace)\nArguable(tiffanie)\nArguable(tiffanie) and not Ataraxic(tiffanie) -> Toothless(tiffanie)\nMammoth(tiffanie) -> Amoebic(tiffanie)\nforall x (Languid(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Ataraxic(x) and Teenaged(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Languid(x) and Ataraxic(x) -> Mammoth(x))\nAtaraxic(pace) and Teenaged(pace) -> not Toothless(pace)\n\nAmoebic(tori)\n\nLanguid(tori) and forall x (Languid(x) -> Amoebic(x)) -> therefore Amoebic(tori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Anna is inguinal. Goldi is titanic. Jeromy is diaphyseal. Royce is moderato. If Royce is moderato and Royce is not diaphyseal then Royce is undeniable. If Royce is operculate then Royce is fitful. If someone is inguinal then they are fitful. If someone is diaphyseal and titanic then they are fitful. Kind people are inguinal. All titanic people are inguinal. Big, diaphyseal people are operculate. If Jeromy is diaphyseal and Jeromy is titanic then Jeromy is not undeniable. Anna is not fitful.", "logic": "\nInguinal(anna)\nTitanic(goldi)\nDiaphyseal(jeromy)\nModerato(royce)\nModerato(royce) and not Diaphyseal(royce) -> Undeniable(royce)\nOperculate(royce) -> Fitful(royce)\nforall x (Inguinal(x) -> Fitful(x))\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) and Titanic(x) -> Fitful(x))\nforall x (Titanic(x) -> Inguinal(x))\nforall x (Titanic(x) -> Inguinal(x))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) and Diaphyseal(x) -> Operculate(x))\nDiaphyseal(jeromy) and Titanic(jeromy) -> not Undeniable(jeromy)\n\nnot Fitful(anna)\n\nInguinal(anna) and forall x (Inguinal(x) -> Fitful(x)) -> therefore Fitful(anna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Willette is honeylike. Terra is acapnotic. Susanna is absolute. Dacia is obtuse. If Dacia is obtuse and Dacia is not absolute then Dacia is histrionic. If Dacia is blackened then Dacia is trimotored. If someone is honeylike then they are trimotored. If someone is absolute and acapnotic then they are trimotored. Kind people are honeylike. All acapnotic people are honeylike. Big, absolute people are blackened. If Susanna is absolute and Susanna is acapnotic then Susanna is not histrionic. Terra is trimotored.", "logic": "\nHoneylike(willette)\nAcapnotic(terra)\nAbsolute(susanna)\nObtuse(dacia)\nObtuse(dacia) and not Absolute(dacia) -> Histrionic(dacia)\nBlackened(dacia) -> Trimotored(dacia)\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> Trimotored(x))\nforall x (Absolute(x) and Acapnotic(x) -> Trimotored(x))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) and Absolute(x) -> Blackened(x))\nAbsolute(susanna) and Acapnotic(susanna) -> not Histrionic(susanna)\n\nTrimotored(terra)\n\nAcapnotic(terra) and forall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Honeylike(x)) -> therefore Honeylike(terra) Honeylike(terra) and forall x (Honeylike(x) -> Trimotored(x)) -> therefore Trimotored(terra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Tonya is earnest. Gussy is unadorned. Buffy is submarine. Rea is beatable. If Rea is beatable and Rea is not submarine then Rea is mimic. If Rea is bittie then Rea is oval. If someone is earnest then they are oval. If someone is submarine and unadorned then they are oval. Kind people are earnest. All unadorned people are earnest. Big, submarine people are bittie. If Buffy is submarine and Buffy is unadorned then Buffy is not mimic. Gussy is not oval.", "logic": "\nEarnest(tonya)\nUnadorned(gussy)\nSubmarine(buffy)\nBeatable(rea)\nBeatable(rea) and not Submarine(rea) -> Mimic(rea)\nBittie(rea) -> Oval(rea)\nforall x (Earnest(x) -> Oval(x))\nforall x (Submarine(x) and Unadorned(x) -> Oval(x))\nforall x (Unadorned(x) -> Earnest(x))\nforall x (Unadorned(x) -> Earnest(x))\nforall x (Earnest(x) and Submarine(x) -> Bittie(x))\nSubmarine(buffy) and Unadorned(buffy) -> not Mimic(buffy)\n\nnot Oval(gussy)\n\nUnadorned(gussy) and forall x (Unadorned(x) -> Earnest(x)) -> therefore Earnest(gussy) Earnest(gussy) and forall x (Earnest(x) -> Oval(x)) -> therefore Oval(gussy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Sturgis is nonresiny. Kippie is apocarpous. Cordy is upsetting. Ash is amicable. If Ash is amicable and Ash is not upsetting then Ash is illative. If Ash is savourless then Ash is collusive. If someone is nonresiny then they are collusive. If someone is upsetting and apocarpous then they are collusive. Kind people are nonresiny. All apocarpous people are nonresiny. Big, upsetting people are savourless. If Cordy is upsetting and Cordy is apocarpous then Cordy is not illative. Cordy is not savourless.", "logic": "\nNonresiny(sturgis)\nApocarpous(kippie)\nUpsetting(cordy)\nAmicable(ash)\nAmicable(ash) and not Upsetting(ash) -> Illative(ash)\nSavourless(ash) -> Collusive(ash)\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Upsetting(x) and Apocarpous(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Upsetting(x) -> Savourless(x))\nUpsetting(cordy) and Apocarpous(cordy) -> not Illative(cordy)\n\nnot Savourless(cordy)\n\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Upsetting(x) -> Savourless(x)) <- forall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Nonresiny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Jocelyne is kashmiri. Stu is inhumane. Reece is bent. Titos is clanging. If Titos is clanging and Titos is not bent then Titos is salvadoran. If Titos is micropylar then Titos is monitory. If someone is kashmiri then they are monitory. If someone is bent and inhumane then they are monitory. Kind people are kashmiri. All inhumane people are kashmiri. Big, bent people are micropylar. If Reece is bent and Reece is inhumane then Reece is not salvadoran. Jocelyne is micropylar.", "logic": "\nKashmiri(jocelyne)\nInhumane(stu)\nBent(reece)\nClanging(titos)\nClanging(titos) and not Bent(titos) -> Salvadoran(titos)\nMicropylar(titos) -> Monitory(titos)\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) -> Monitory(x))\nforall x (Bent(x) and Inhumane(x) -> Monitory(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Kashmiri(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Kashmiri(x))\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) and Bent(x) -> Micropylar(x))\nBent(reece) and Inhumane(reece) -> not Salvadoran(reece)\n\nMicropylar(jocelyne)\n\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) and Bent(x) -> Micropylar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Portia is suasible. Donal is equipoised. Allis is turbid. Gregory is goddamn. If Gregory is goddamn and Gregory is not turbid then Gregory is guardant. If Gregory is misrelated then Gregory is liberian. If someone is suasible then they are liberian. If someone is turbid and equipoised then they are liberian. Kind people are suasible. All equipoised people are suasible. Big, turbid people are misrelated. If Allis is turbid and Allis is equipoised then Allis is not guardant. Donal is not misrelated.", "logic": "\nSuasible(portia)\nEquipoised(donal)\nTurbid(allis)\nGoddamn(gregory)\nGoddamn(gregory) and not Turbid(gregory) -> Guardant(gregory)\nMisrelated(gregory) -> Liberian(gregory)\nforall x (Suasible(x) -> Liberian(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) and Equipoised(x) -> Liberian(x))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) -> Suasible(x))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) -> Suasible(x))\nforall x (Suasible(x) and Turbid(x) -> Misrelated(x))\nTurbid(allis) and Equipoised(allis) -> not Guardant(allis)\n\nnot Misrelated(donal)\n\nforall x (Suasible(x) and Turbid(x) -> Misrelated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Kata is jamesian. Chrystal is unembodied. Randal is proclaimed. Travis is communist. If Travis is communist and Travis is not proclaimed then Travis is stillborn. If Travis is hammered then Travis is venerating. If someone is jamesian then they are venerating. If someone is proclaimed and unembodied then they are venerating. Kind people are jamesian. All unembodied people are jamesian. Big, proclaimed people are hammered. If Randal is proclaimed and Randal is unembodied then Randal is not stillborn. Travis is proclaimed.", "logic": "\nJamesian(kata)\nUnembodied(chrystal)\nProclaimed(randal)\nCommunist(travis)\nCommunist(travis) and not Proclaimed(travis) -> Stillborn(travis)\nHammered(travis) -> Venerating(travis)\nforall x (Jamesian(x) -> Venerating(x))\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) and Unembodied(x) -> Venerating(x))\nforall x (Unembodied(x) -> Jamesian(x))\nforall x (Unembodied(x) -> Jamesian(x))\nforall x (Jamesian(x) and Proclaimed(x) -> Hammered(x))\nProclaimed(randal) and Unembodied(randal) -> not Stillborn(randal)\n\nProclaimed(travis)\n\nProclaimed(travis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Vibhu is placental. Rosamond is colourless. Kit is grooved. Mehetabel is viselike. If Mehetabel is viselike and Mehetabel is not grooved then Mehetabel is marital. If Mehetabel is wanting then Mehetabel is efficient. If someone is placental then they are efficient. If someone is grooved and colourless then they are efficient. Kind people are placental. All colourless people are placental. Big, grooved people are wanting. If Kit is grooved and Kit is colourless then Kit is not marital. Rosamond is not viselike.", "logic": "\nPlacental(vibhu)\nColourless(rosamond)\nGrooved(kit)\nViselike(mehetabel)\nViselike(mehetabel) and not Grooved(mehetabel) -> Marital(mehetabel)\nWanting(mehetabel) -> Efficient(mehetabel)\nforall x (Placental(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Grooved(x) and Colourless(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Placental(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Placental(x))\nforall x (Placental(x) and Grooved(x) -> Wanting(x))\nGrooved(kit) and Colourless(kit) -> not Marital(kit)\n\nnot Viselike(rosamond)\n\nnot Viselike(rosamond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Rahel is pendant. Kylynn is sleeveless. Shlomo is bourgeois. Kaia is clarion. If Kaia is clarion and Kaia is not bourgeois then Kaia is unmindful. If Kaia is resinous then Kaia is avenged. If someone is pendant then they are avenged. If someone is bourgeois and sleeveless then they are avenged. Kind people are pendant. All sleeveless people are pendant. Big, bourgeois people are resinous. If Shlomo is bourgeois and Shlomo is sleeveless then Shlomo is not unmindful. Kylynn is unmindful.", "logic": "\nPendant(rahel)\nSleeveless(kylynn)\nBourgeois(shlomo)\nClarion(kaia)\nClarion(kaia) and not Bourgeois(kaia) -> Unmindful(kaia)\nResinous(kaia) -> Avenged(kaia)\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> Avenged(x))\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Avenged(x))\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Pendant(x))\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Pendant(x))\nforall x (Pendant(x) and Bourgeois(x) -> Resinous(x))\nBourgeois(shlomo) and Sleeveless(shlomo) -> not Unmindful(shlomo)\n\nUnmindful(kylynn)\n\nUnmindful(kylynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-591"} {"premises": "Yule is windup. Yule is detected. Yule is dyspnoeic. Gusty is sapiential. Jeana is detected. Francyne is windup. Francyne is dyspnoeic. If someone is dyspnoeic then they are not sapiential. If someone is dyspnoeic and not sapiential then they are detected. Yule is detected.", "logic": "\nWindup(yule)\nDetected(yule)\nDyspnoeic(yule)\nSapiential(gusty)\nDetected(jeana)\nWindup(francyne)\nDyspnoeic(francyne)\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> not Sapiential(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and not Sapiential(x) -> Detected(x))\n\nDetected(yule)\n\ntherefore Detected(yule)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Carl is propellent. Carl is received. Carl is carousing. Wandie is fevered. Tamarah is received. Evvy is propellent. Evvy is carousing. If someone is carousing then they are not fevered. If someone is carousing and not fevered then they are received. Wandie is not fevered.", "logic": "\nPropellent(carl)\nReceived(carl)\nCarousing(carl)\nFevered(wandie)\nReceived(tamarah)\nPropellent(evvy)\nCarousing(evvy)\nforall x (Carousing(x) -> not Fevered(x))\nforall x (Carousing(x) and not Fevered(x) -> Received(x))\n\nnot Fevered(wandie)\n\ntherefore Fevered(wandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Colin is plucky. Colin is moribund. Colin is allophonic. Juliana is touristed. Agace is moribund. Becca is plucky. Becca is allophonic. If someone is allophonic then they are not touristed. If someone is allophonic and not touristed then they are moribund. Becca is not touristed.", "logic": "\nPlucky(colin)\nMoribund(colin)\nAllophonic(colin)\nTouristed(juliana)\nMoribund(agace)\nPlucky(becca)\nAllophonic(becca)\nforall x (Allophonic(x) -> not Touristed(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) and not Touristed(x) -> Moribund(x))\n\nnot Touristed(becca)\n\nAllophonic(becca) and forall x (Allophonic(x) -> not Touristed(x)) -> therefore not Touristed(becca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Florry is oblate. Florry is tetragonal. Florry is sovereign. Jamey is satisfying. Fanchette is tetragonal. Ravi is oblate. Ravi is sovereign. If someone is sovereign then they are not satisfying. If someone is sovereign and not satisfying then they are tetragonal. Florry is satisfying.", "logic": "\nOblate(florry)\nTetragonal(florry)\nSovereign(florry)\nSatisfying(jamey)\nTetragonal(fanchette)\nOblate(ravi)\nSovereign(ravi)\nforall x (Sovereign(x) -> not Satisfying(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and not Satisfying(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\n\nSatisfying(florry)\n\nSovereign(florry) and forall x (Sovereign(x) -> not Satisfying(x)) -> therefore not Satisfying(florry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Fyodor is gradual. Fyodor is untainted. Fyodor is wonted. Sorcha is osmotic. Tab is untainted. Silvester is gradual. Silvester is wonted. If someone is wonted then they are not osmotic. If someone is wonted and not osmotic then they are untainted. Silvester is untainted.", "logic": "\nGradual(fyodor)\nUntainted(fyodor)\nWonted(fyodor)\nOsmotic(sorcha)\nUntainted(tab)\nGradual(silvester)\nWonted(silvester)\nforall x (Wonted(x) -> not Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Wonted(x) and not Osmotic(x) -> Untainted(x))\n\nUntainted(silvester)\n\nWonted(silvester) and forall x (Wonted(x) -> not Osmotic(x)) -> therefore not Osmotic(silvester) Wonted(silvester) and not Osmotic(silvester) and forall x (Wonted(x) and not Osmotic(x) -> Untainted(x)) -> therefore Untainted(silvester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Muhammad is harrowing. Muhammad is jacobinic. Muhammad is armenian. Benji is calvinist. Margaret is jacobinic. Udell is harrowing. Udell is armenian. If someone is armenian then they are not calvinist. If someone is armenian and not calvinist then they are jacobinic. Udell is not jacobinic.", "logic": "\nHarrowing(muhammad)\nJacobinic(muhammad)\nArmenian(muhammad)\nCalvinist(benji)\nJacobinic(margaret)\nHarrowing(udell)\nArmenian(udell)\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> not Calvinist(x))\nforall x (Armenian(x) and not Calvinist(x) -> Jacobinic(x))\n\nnot Jacobinic(udell)\n\nArmenian(udell) and forall x (Armenian(x) -> not Calvinist(x)) -> therefore not Calvinist(udell) Armenian(udell) and not Calvinist(udell) and forall x (Armenian(x) and not Calvinist(x) -> Jacobinic(x)) -> therefore Jacobinic(udell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Caron is sturdy. Caron is legendary. Caron is uncoated. Egbert is hilar. Wally is legendary. Rona is sturdy. Rona is uncoated. If someone is uncoated then they are not hilar. If someone is uncoated and not hilar then they are legendary. Egbert is not legendary.", "logic": "\nSturdy(caron)\nLegendary(caron)\nUncoated(caron)\nHilar(egbert)\nLegendary(wally)\nSturdy(rona)\nUncoated(rona)\nforall x (Uncoated(x) -> not Hilar(x))\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and not Hilar(x) -> Legendary(x))\n\nnot Legendary(egbert)\n\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and not Hilar(x) -> Legendary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Elianora is japanese. Elianora is dogging. Elianora is bedrid. Fidelity is uppity. Cornie is dogging. Thaddius is japanese. Thaddius is bedrid. If someone is bedrid then they are not uppity. If someone is bedrid and not uppity then they are dogging. Fidelity is bedrid.", "logic": "\nJapanese(elianora)\nDogging(elianora)\nBedrid(elianora)\nUppity(fidelity)\nDogging(cornie)\nJapanese(thaddius)\nBedrid(thaddius)\nforall x (Bedrid(x) -> not Uppity(x))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and not Uppity(x) -> Dogging(x))\n\nBedrid(fidelity)\n\nBedrid(fidelity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Rahal is mettlesome. Rahal is wilsonian. Rahal is debile. Conroy is dense. Quintus is wilsonian. Ediva is mettlesome. Ediva is debile. If someone is debile then they are not dense. If someone is debile and not dense then they are wilsonian. Conroy is not young.", "logic": "\nMettlesome(rahal)\nWilsonian(rahal)\nDebile(rahal)\nDense(conroy)\nWilsonian(quintus)\nMettlesome(ediva)\nDebile(ediva)\nforall x (Debile(x) -> not Dense(x))\nforall x (Debile(x) and not Dense(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\n\nnot Young(conroy)\n\nnot Young(conroy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Devora is allotropic. Devora is perishable. Devora is inexpert. Annelise is intense. Patrica is perishable. Alastair is allotropic. Alastair is inexpert. If someone is inexpert then they are not intense. If someone is inexpert and not intense then they are perishable. Alastair is young.", "logic": "\nAllotropic(devora)\nPerishable(devora)\nInexpert(devora)\nIntense(annelise)\nPerishable(patrica)\nAllotropic(alastair)\nInexpert(alastair)\nforall x (Inexpert(x) -> not Intense(x))\nforall x (Inexpert(x) and not Intense(x) -> Perishable(x))\n\nYoung(alastair)\n\nYoung(alastair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Danica is wanted. Danica is lettered. Danica is radiate. Zippy is carnation. Leisha is lettered. Errol is wanted. Errol is radiate. If someone is radiate then they are not carnation. If someone is radiate and not carnation then they are lettered. Danica is not kind.", "logic": "\nWanted(danica)\nLettered(danica)\nRadiate(danica)\nCarnation(zippy)\nLettered(leisha)\nWanted(errol)\nRadiate(errol)\nforall x (Radiate(x) -> not Carnation(x))\nforall x (Radiate(x) and not Carnation(x) -> Lettered(x))\n\nnot Kind(danica)\n\nnot Kind(danica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Shayne is panamanian. Shayne is chafflike. Shayne is mordant. Sawyere is bathyal. Pieter is chafflike. Morry is panamanian. Morry is mordant. If someone is mordant then they are not bathyal. If someone is mordant and not bathyal then they are chafflike. Sawyere is panamanian.", "logic": "\nPanamanian(shayne)\nChafflike(shayne)\nMordant(shayne)\nBathyal(sawyere)\nChafflike(pieter)\nPanamanian(morry)\nMordant(morry)\nforall x (Mordant(x) -> not Bathyal(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) and not Bathyal(x) -> Chafflike(x))\n\nPanamanian(sawyere)\n\nPanamanian(sawyere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-269"} {"premises": "Honey is cursory. Round people are caller. If someone is cursory and caller then they are hormonal. Honey is cursory.", "logic": "\nCursory(honey)\nforall x (Cursory(x) -> Caller(x))\nforall x (Cursory(x) and Caller(x) -> Hormonal(x))\n\nCursory(honey)\n\ntherefore Cursory(honey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Stafford is auxinic. Round people are eviscerate. If someone is auxinic and eviscerate then they are belittled. Stafford is not auxinic.", "logic": "\nAuxinic(stafford)\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Belittled(x))\n\nnot Auxinic(stafford)\n\ntherefore Auxinic(stafford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Brynn is dogmatic. Round people are erasmian. If someone is dogmatic and erasmian then they are gossamer. Brynn is erasmian.", "logic": "\nDogmatic(brynn)\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Erasmian(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) and Erasmian(x) -> Gossamer(x))\n\nErasmian(brynn)\n\nDogmatic(brynn) and forall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Erasmian(x)) -> therefore Erasmian(brynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Lloyd is edacious. Round people are calycine. If someone is edacious and calycine then they are maltese. Lloyd is not calycine.", "logic": "\nEdacious(lloyd)\nforall x (Edacious(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Edacious(x) and Calycine(x) -> Maltese(x))\n\nnot Calycine(lloyd)\n\nEdacious(lloyd) and forall x (Edacious(x) -> Calycine(x)) -> therefore Calycine(lloyd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Standford is discontent. Round people are unenviable. If someone is discontent and unenviable then they are merry. Standford is merry.", "logic": "\nDiscontent(standford)\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Unenviable(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) and Unenviable(x) -> Merry(x))\n\nMerry(standford)\n\nDiscontent(standford) and forall x (Discontent(x) -> Unenviable(x)) -> therefore Unenviable(standford) Discontent(standford) and Unenviable(standford) and forall x (Discontent(x) and Unenviable(x) -> Merry(x)) -> therefore Merry(standford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Noam is undrained. Round people are vital. If someone is undrained and vital then they are maritime. Noam is not maritime.", "logic": "\nUndrained(noam)\nforall x (Undrained(x) -> Vital(x))\nforall x (Undrained(x) and Vital(x) -> Maritime(x))\n\nnot Maritime(noam)\n\nUndrained(noam) and forall x (Undrained(x) -> Vital(x)) -> therefore Vital(noam) Undrained(noam) and Vital(noam) and forall x (Undrained(x) and Vital(x) -> Maritime(x)) -> therefore Maritime(noam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Annaliese is tendinous. Round people are demoniac. If someone is tendinous and demoniac then they are senior. Annaliese is not rough.", "logic": "\nTendinous(annaliese)\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> Demoniac(x))\nforall x (Tendinous(x) and Demoniac(x) -> Senior(x))\n\nnot Rough(annaliese)\n\nnot Rough(annaliese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Sully is yonder. Round people are foolish. If someone is yonder and foolish then they are apian. Sully is white.", "logic": "\nYonder(sully)\nforall x (Yonder(x) -> Foolish(x))\nforall x (Yonder(x) and Foolish(x) -> Apian(x))\n\nWhite(sully)\n\nWhite(sully) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Hannis is diachronic. Round people are flightless. If someone is diachronic and flightless then they are cinematic. Hannis is not smart.", "logic": "\nDiachronic(hannis)\nforall x (Diachronic(x) -> Flightless(x))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) and Flightless(x) -> Cinematic(x))\n\nnot Smart(hannis)\n\nnot Smart(hannis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "Doyle is retrorse. Round people are loosened. If someone is retrorse and loosened then they are curt. Doyle is green.", "logic": "\nRetrorse(doyle)\nforall x (Retrorse(x) -> Loosened(x))\nforall x (Retrorse(x) and Loosened(x) -> Curt(x))\n\nGreen(doyle)\n\nGreen(doyle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The reiko is pyaemic. The susana is acerb. The sonnnie swelter the mozelle. The mozelle swelter the sonnnie. All pyaemic people are acerb. If the sonnnie does not chase the reiko and the sonnnie does not need the susana then the reiko is acerb. If someone approve the susana and the susana does not chase the mozelle then the susana mime the sonnnie. If someone swelter the sonnnie then they are pyaemic. If someone approve the sonnnie then the sonnnie does not eat the mozelle. If someone mime the sonnnie then the sonnnie is outermost. If the mozelle is outermost then the mozelle swelter the reiko. If someone mime the sonnnie and they are not pyaemic then they are outermost. The susana is acerb.", "logic": "\nPyaemic(reiko)\nAcerb(susana)\nSwelter(sonnnie, mozelle)\nSwelter(mozelle, sonnnie)\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Acerb(x))\nnot Approve(sonnnie, reiko) and not Swelter(sonnnie, susana) -> Acerb(reiko)\nforall x (Approve(x, susana) and not Approve(susana, mozelle) -> Mime(susana, sonnnie))\nforall x (Swelter(x, sonnnie) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Approve(x, sonnnie) -> not Mime(sonnnie, mozelle))\nforall x (Mime(x, sonnnie) -> Outermost(sonnnie))\nOutermost(mozelle) -> Swelter(mozelle, reiko)\nforall x (Mime(x, sonnnie) and not Pyaemic(x) -> Outermost(x))\n\nAcerb(susana)\n\ntherefore Acerb(susana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The sheff is silicious. The paula is pyrogenic. The raine bombard the wynton. The wynton bombard the raine. All silicious people are pyrogenic. If the raine does not chase the sheff and the raine does not need the paula then the sheff is pyrogenic. If someone sermonize the paula and the paula does not chase the wynton then the paula blemish the raine. If someone bombard the raine then they are silicious. If someone sermonize the raine then the raine does not eat the wynton. If someone blemish the raine then the raine is inapt. If the wynton is inapt then the wynton bombard the sheff. If someone blemish the raine and they are not silicious then they are inapt. The paula is not pyrogenic.", "logic": "\nSilicious(sheff)\nPyrogenic(paula)\nBombard(raine, wynton)\nBombard(wynton, raine)\nforall x (Silicious(x) -> Pyrogenic(x))\nnot Sermonize(raine, sheff) and not Bombard(raine, paula) -> Pyrogenic(sheff)\nforall x (Sermonize(x, paula) and not Sermonize(paula, wynton) -> Blemish(paula, raine))\nforall x (Bombard(x, raine) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Sermonize(x, raine) -> not Blemish(raine, wynton))\nforall x (Blemish(x, raine) -> Inapt(raine))\nInapt(wynton) -> Bombard(wynton, sheff)\nforall x (Blemish(x, raine) and not Silicious(x) -> Inapt(x))\n\nnot Pyrogenic(paula)\n\ntherefore Pyrogenic(paula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The laurianne is gruesome. The mathilde is farcical. The wenona recurve the ismail. The ismail recurve the wenona. All gruesome people are farcical. If the wenona does not chase the laurianne and the wenona does not need the mathilde then the laurianne is farcical. If someone blubber the mathilde and the mathilde does not chase the ismail then the mathilde hover the wenona. If someone recurve the wenona then they are gruesome. If someone blubber the wenona then the wenona does not eat the ismail. If someone hover the wenona then the wenona is collusive. If the ismail is collusive then the ismail recurve the laurianne. If someone hover the wenona and they are not gruesome then they are collusive. The laurianne is farcical.", "logic": "\nGruesome(laurianne)\nFarcical(mathilde)\nRecurve(wenona, ismail)\nRecurve(ismail, wenona)\nforall x (Gruesome(x) -> Farcical(x))\nnot Blubber(wenona, laurianne) and not Recurve(wenona, mathilde) -> Farcical(laurianne)\nforall x (Blubber(x, mathilde) and not Blubber(mathilde, ismail) -> Hover(mathilde, wenona))\nforall x (Recurve(x, wenona) -> Gruesome(x))\nforall x (Blubber(x, wenona) -> not Hover(wenona, ismail))\nforall x (Hover(x, wenona) -> Collusive(wenona))\nCollusive(ismail) -> Recurve(ismail, laurianne)\nforall x (Hover(x, wenona) and not Gruesome(x) -> Collusive(x))\n\nFarcical(laurianne)\n\nGruesome(laurianne) and forall x (Gruesome(x) -> Farcical(x)) -> therefore Farcical(laurianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The meghan is unpointed. The carmelia is slothful. The valera transmit the cybal. The cybal transmit the valera. All unpointed people are slothful. If the valera does not chase the meghan and the valera does not need the carmelia then the meghan is slothful. If someone signpost the carmelia and the carmelia does not chase the cybal then the carmelia syllabize the valera. If someone transmit the valera then they are unpointed. If someone signpost the valera then the valera does not eat the cybal. If someone syllabize the valera then the valera is wedged. If the cybal is wedged then the cybal transmit the meghan. If someone syllabize the valera and they are not unpointed then they are wedged. The meghan is not slothful.", "logic": "\nUnpointed(meghan)\nSlothful(carmelia)\nTransmit(valera, cybal)\nTransmit(cybal, valera)\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Slothful(x))\nnot Signpost(valera, meghan) and not Transmit(valera, carmelia) -> Slothful(meghan)\nforall x (Signpost(x, carmelia) and not Signpost(carmelia, cybal) -> Syllabize(carmelia, valera))\nforall x (Transmit(x, valera) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Signpost(x, valera) -> not Syllabize(valera, cybal))\nforall x (Syllabize(x, valera) -> Wedged(valera))\nWedged(cybal) -> Transmit(cybal, meghan)\nforall x (Syllabize(x, valera) and not Unpointed(x) -> Wedged(x))\n\nnot Slothful(meghan)\n\nUnpointed(meghan) and forall x (Unpointed(x) -> Slothful(x)) -> therefore Slothful(meghan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The krystle is articled. The frederich is interfaith. The tiffy flow the rubina. The rubina flow the tiffy. All articled people are interfaith. If the tiffy does not chase the krystle and the tiffy does not need the frederich then the krystle is interfaith. If someone weight the frederich and the frederich does not chase the rubina then the frederich fleece the tiffy. If someone flow the tiffy then they are articled. If someone weight the tiffy then the tiffy does not eat the rubina. If someone fleece the tiffy then the tiffy is softening. If the rubina is softening then the rubina flow the krystle. If someone fleece the tiffy and they are not articled then they are softening. The rubina is interfaith.", "logic": "\nArticled(krystle)\nInterfaith(frederich)\nFlow(tiffy, rubina)\nFlow(rubina, tiffy)\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Interfaith(x))\nnot Weight(tiffy, krystle) and not Flow(tiffy, frederich) -> Interfaith(krystle)\nforall x (Weight(x, frederich) and not Weight(frederich, rubina) -> Fleece(frederich, tiffy))\nforall x (Flow(x, tiffy) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Weight(x, tiffy) -> not Fleece(tiffy, rubina))\nforall x (Fleece(x, tiffy) -> Softening(tiffy))\nSoftening(rubina) -> Flow(rubina, krystle)\nforall x (Fleece(x, tiffy) and not Articled(x) -> Softening(x))\n\nInterfaith(rubina)\n\nFlow(rubina, tiffy) and forall x (Flow(x, tiffy) -> Articled(x)) -> therefore Articled(rubina) Articled(rubina) and forall x (Articled(x) -> Interfaith(x)) -> therefore Interfaith(rubina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The marijo is scots. The russel is thoriated. The carlyle program the wallas. The wallas program the carlyle. All scots people are thoriated. If the carlyle does not chase the marijo and the carlyle does not need the russel then the marijo is thoriated. If someone immunize the russel and the russel does not chase the wallas then the russel falcon the carlyle. If someone program the carlyle then they are scots. If someone immunize the carlyle then the carlyle does not eat the wallas. If someone falcon the carlyle then the carlyle is uxorial. If the wallas is uxorial then the wallas program the marijo. If someone falcon the carlyle and they are not scots then they are uxorial. The wallas is not thoriated.", "logic": "\nScots(marijo)\nThoriated(russel)\nProgram(carlyle, wallas)\nProgram(wallas, carlyle)\nforall x (Scots(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nnot Immunize(carlyle, marijo) and not Program(carlyle, russel) -> Thoriated(marijo)\nforall x (Immunize(x, russel) and not Immunize(russel, wallas) -> Falcon(russel, carlyle))\nforall x (Program(x, carlyle) -> Scots(x))\nforall x (Immunize(x, carlyle) -> not Falcon(carlyle, wallas))\nforall x (Falcon(x, carlyle) -> Uxorial(carlyle))\nUxorial(wallas) -> Program(wallas, marijo)\nforall x (Falcon(x, carlyle) and not Scots(x) -> Uxorial(x))\n\nnot Thoriated(wallas)\n\nProgram(wallas, carlyle) and forall x (Program(x, carlyle) -> Scots(x)) -> therefore Scots(wallas) Scots(wallas) and forall x (Scots(x) -> Thoriated(x)) -> therefore Thoriated(wallas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The roobbie is fairish. The rosalie is validating. The joby present the seth. The seth present the joby. All fairish people are validating. If the joby does not chase the roobbie and the joby does not need the rosalie then the roobbie is validating. If someone shoot the rosalie and the rosalie does not chase the seth then the rosalie capitalize the joby. If someone present the joby then they are fairish. If someone shoot the joby then the joby does not eat the seth. If someone capitalize the joby then the joby is brilliant. If the seth is brilliant then the seth present the roobbie. If someone capitalize the joby and they are not fairish then they are brilliant. The rosalie is not brilliant.", "logic": "\nFairish(roobbie)\nValidating(rosalie)\nPresent(joby, seth)\nPresent(seth, joby)\nforall x (Fairish(x) -> Validating(x))\nnot Shoot(joby, roobbie) and not Present(joby, rosalie) -> Validating(roobbie)\nforall x (Shoot(x, rosalie) and not Shoot(rosalie, seth) -> Capitalize(rosalie, joby))\nforall x (Present(x, joby) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Shoot(x, joby) -> not Capitalize(joby, seth))\nforall x (Capitalize(x, joby) -> Brilliant(joby))\nBrilliant(seth) -> Present(seth, roobbie)\nforall x (Capitalize(x, joby) and not Fairish(x) -> Brilliant(x))\n\nnot Brilliant(rosalie)\n\nforall x (Capitalize(x, joby) and not Fairish(x) -> Brilliant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The dalton is clxx. The kissee is saxon. The dyann solemnise the lindsy. The lindsy solemnise the dyann. All clxx people are saxon. If the dyann does not chase the dalton and the dyann does not need the kissee then the dalton is saxon. If someone autograph the kissee and the kissee does not chase the lindsy then the kissee regularize the dyann. If someone solemnise the dyann then they are clxx. If someone autograph the dyann then the dyann does not eat the lindsy. If someone regularize the dyann then the dyann is subjacent. If the lindsy is subjacent then the lindsy solemnise the dalton. If someone regularize the dyann and they are not clxx then they are subjacent. The dyann is saxon.", "logic": "\nClxx(dalton)\nSaxon(kissee)\nSolemnise(dyann, lindsy)\nSolemnise(lindsy, dyann)\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Saxon(x))\nnot Autograph(dyann, dalton) and not Solemnise(dyann, kissee) -> Saxon(dalton)\nforall x (Autograph(x, kissee) and not Autograph(kissee, lindsy) -> Regularize(kissee, dyann))\nforall x (Solemnise(x, dyann) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Autograph(x, dyann) -> not Regularize(dyann, lindsy))\nforall x (Regularize(x, dyann) -> Subjacent(dyann))\nSubjacent(lindsy) -> Solemnise(lindsy, dalton)\nforall x (Regularize(x, dyann) and not Clxx(x) -> Subjacent(x))\n\nSaxon(dyann)\n\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Saxon(x)) <- forall x (Solemnise(x, dyann) -> Clxx(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The adriaens is unprompted. The modestine is triangular. The corilla corrode the wilmette. The wilmette corrode the corilla. All unprompted people are triangular. If the corilla does not chase the adriaens and the corilla does not need the modestine then the adriaens is triangular. If someone deputize the modestine and the modestine does not chase the wilmette then the modestine diversify the corilla. If someone corrode the corilla then they are unprompted. If someone deputize the corilla then the corilla does not eat the wilmette. If someone diversify the corilla then the corilla is aegean. If the wilmette is aegean then the wilmette corrode the adriaens. If someone diversify the corilla and they are not unprompted then they are aegean. The adriaens is not aegean.", "logic": "\nUnprompted(adriaens)\nTriangular(modestine)\nCorrode(corilla, wilmette)\nCorrode(wilmette, corilla)\nforall x (Unprompted(x) -> Triangular(x))\nnot Deputize(corilla, adriaens) and not Corrode(corilla, modestine) -> Triangular(adriaens)\nforall x (Deputize(x, modestine) and not Deputize(modestine, wilmette) -> Diversify(modestine, corilla))\nforall x (Corrode(x, corilla) -> Unprompted(x))\nforall x (Deputize(x, corilla) -> not Diversify(corilla, wilmette))\nforall x (Diversify(x, corilla) -> Aegean(corilla))\nAegean(wilmette) -> Corrode(wilmette, adriaens)\nforall x (Diversify(x, corilla) and not Unprompted(x) -> Aegean(x))\n\nnot Aegean(adriaens)\n\nforall x (Diversify(x, corilla) and not Unprompted(x) -> Aegean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The mae is sterilised. The ainslee is yearly. The danita exorcize the bertina. The bertina exorcize the danita. All sterilised people are yearly. If the danita does not chase the mae and the danita does not need the ainslee then the mae is yearly. If someone typecast the ainslee and the ainslee does not chase the bertina then the ainslee clerk the danita. If someone exorcize the danita then they are sterilised. If someone typecast the danita then the danita does not eat the bertina. If someone clerk the danita then the danita is adust. If the bertina is adust then the bertina exorcize the mae. If someone clerk the danita and they are not sterilised then they are adust. The bertina clerk the bertina.", "logic": "\nSterilised(mae)\nYearly(ainslee)\nExorcize(danita, bertina)\nExorcize(bertina, danita)\nforall x (Sterilised(x) -> Yearly(x))\nnot Typecast(danita, mae) and not Exorcize(danita, ainslee) -> Yearly(mae)\nforall x (Typecast(x, ainslee) and not Typecast(ainslee, bertina) -> Clerk(ainslee, danita))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, danita) -> Sterilised(x))\nforall x (Typecast(x, danita) -> not Clerk(danita, bertina))\nforall x (Clerk(x, danita) -> Adust(danita))\nAdust(bertina) -> Exorcize(bertina, mae)\nforall x (Clerk(x, danita) and not Sterilised(x) -> Adust(x))\n\nClerk(bertina, bertina)\n\nClerk(bertina, bertina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The christean is frowsty. The magda is arthritic. The carrissa treasure the chance. The chance treasure the carrissa. All frowsty people are arthritic. If the carrissa does not chase the christean and the carrissa does not need the magda then the christean is arthritic. If someone culture the magda and the magda does not chase the chance then the magda undercoat the carrissa. If someone treasure the carrissa then they are frowsty. If someone culture the carrissa then the carrissa does not eat the chance. If someone undercoat the carrissa then the carrissa is gristly. If the chance is gristly then the chance treasure the christean. If someone undercoat the carrissa and they are not frowsty then they are gristly. The christean does not chase the chance.", "logic": "\nFrowsty(christean)\nArthritic(magda)\nTreasure(carrissa, chance)\nTreasure(chance, carrissa)\nforall x (Frowsty(x) -> Arthritic(x))\nnot Culture(carrissa, christean) and not Treasure(carrissa, magda) -> Arthritic(christean)\nforall x (Culture(x, magda) and not Culture(magda, chance) -> Undercoat(magda, carrissa))\nforall x (Treasure(x, carrissa) -> Frowsty(x))\nforall x (Culture(x, carrissa) -> not Undercoat(carrissa, chance))\nforall x (Undercoat(x, carrissa) -> Gristly(carrissa))\nGristly(chance) -> Treasure(chance, christean)\nforall x (Undercoat(x, carrissa) and not Frowsty(x) -> Gristly(x))\n\nnot Culture(christean, chance)\n\nnot Culture(christean, chance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "The baxter is antebellum. The xavier is edwardian. The caressa transude the lilla. The lilla transude the caressa. All antebellum people are edwardian. If the caressa does not chase the baxter and the caressa does not need the xavier then the baxter is edwardian. If someone preisolate the xavier and the xavier does not chase the lilla then the xavier glow the caressa. If someone transude the caressa then they are antebellum. If someone preisolate the caressa then the caressa does not eat the lilla. If someone glow the caressa then the caressa is several. If the lilla is several then the lilla transude the baxter. If someone glow the caressa and they are not antebellum then they are several. The baxter glow the caressa.", "logic": "\nAntebellum(baxter)\nEdwardian(xavier)\nTransude(caressa, lilla)\nTransude(lilla, caressa)\nforall x (Antebellum(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nnot Preisolate(caressa, baxter) and not Transude(caressa, xavier) -> Edwardian(baxter)\nforall x (Preisolate(x, xavier) and not Preisolate(xavier, lilla) -> Glow(xavier, caressa))\nforall x (Transude(x, caressa) -> Antebellum(x))\nforall x (Preisolate(x, caressa) -> not Glow(caressa, lilla))\nforall x (Glow(x, caressa) -> Several(caressa))\nSeveral(lilla) -> Transude(lilla, baxter)\nforall x (Glow(x, caressa) and not Antebellum(x) -> Several(x))\n\nGlow(baxter, caressa)\n\nGlow(baxter, caressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-842"} {"premises": "Turner is nonplussed. Agamemnon is not ordered. All artful people are ordered. Furry people are artful. Red people are demented. Agamemnon is not ordered.", "logic": "\nNonplussed(turner)\nnot Ordered(agamemnon)\nforall x (Artful(x) -> Ordered(x))\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Artful(x))\nforall x (Woolen(x) -> Demented(x))\n\nnot Ordered(agamemnon)\n\ntherefore not Ordered(agamemnon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Jenna is antipodal. Binni is not flaccid. All doubled people are flaccid. Furry people are doubled. Red people are ingrowing. Binni is flaccid.", "logic": "\nAntipodal(jenna)\nnot Flaccid(binni)\nforall x (Doubled(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Antipodal(x) -> Doubled(x))\nforall x (Consecrate(x) -> Ingrowing(x))\n\nFlaccid(binni)\n\ntherefore not Flaccid(binni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Lori is monotypic. Joannes is not uncolored. All unrelieved people are uncolored. Furry people are unrelieved. Red people are currish. Lori is unrelieved.", "logic": "\nMonotypic(lori)\nnot Uncolored(joannes)\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Antibiotic(x) -> Currish(x))\n\nUnrelieved(lori)\n\nMonotypic(lori) and forall x (Monotypic(x) -> Unrelieved(x)) -> therefore Unrelieved(lori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Emiline is unreleased. Lari is not recyclable. All gradable people are recyclable. Furry people are gradable. Red people are exemplary. Emiline is not gradable.", "logic": "\nUnreleased(emiline)\nnot Recyclable(lari)\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) -> Gradable(x))\nforall x (Brave(x) -> Exemplary(x))\n\nnot Gradable(emiline)\n\nUnreleased(emiline) and forall x (Unreleased(x) -> Gradable(x)) -> therefore Gradable(emiline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Brunhilda is plucked. Ashton is not ciliary. All adsorptive people are ciliary. Furry people are adsorptive. Red people are gandhian. Brunhilda is ciliary.", "logic": "\nPlucked(brunhilda)\nnot Ciliary(ashton)\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) -> Ciliary(x))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Gandhian(x))\n\nCiliary(brunhilda)\n\nPlucked(brunhilda) and forall x (Plucked(x) -> Adsorptive(x)) -> therefore Adsorptive(brunhilda) Adsorptive(brunhilda) and forall x (Adsorptive(x) -> Ciliary(x)) -> therefore Ciliary(brunhilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Lynea is baggy. Tully is not overladen. All happy people are overladen. Furry people are happy. Red people are callow. Lynea is not overladen.", "logic": "\nBaggy(lynea)\nnot Overladen(tully)\nforall x (Happy(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Mouthless(x) -> Callow(x))\n\nnot Overladen(lynea)\n\nBaggy(lynea) and forall x (Baggy(x) -> Happy(x)) -> therefore Happy(lynea) Happy(lynea) and forall x (Happy(x) -> Overladen(x)) -> therefore Overladen(lynea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Nata is full. Gelya is not beninese. All cypriot people are beninese. Furry people are cypriot. Red people are lordless. Gelya is not cypriot.", "logic": "\nFull(nata)\nnot Beninese(gelya)\nforall x (Cypriot(x) -> Beninese(x))\nforall x (Full(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Lordless(x))\n\nnot Cypriot(gelya)\n\nforall x (Full(x) -> Cypriot(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Ian is ungroomed. Valencia is not pejorative. All doctrinal people are pejorative. Furry people are doctrinal. Red people are closing. Ian is closing.", "logic": "\nUngroomed(ian)\nnot Pejorative(valencia)\nforall x (Doctrinal(x) -> Pejorative(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Bovid(x) -> Closing(x))\n\nClosing(ian)\n\nforall x (Bovid(x) -> Closing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Myles is shrunken. Corinna is not skintight. All wayfaring people are skintight. Furry people are wayfaring. Red people are choked. Corinna is not choked.", "logic": "\nShrunken(myles)\nnot Skintight(corinna)\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Skintight(x))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Choked(x))\n\nnot Choked(corinna)\n\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Choked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Roz is quadruplex. Joseph is not tricksy. All mawkish people are tricksy. Furry people are mawkish. Red people are slick. Joseph is thundery.", "logic": "\nQuadruplex(roz)\nnot Tricksy(joseph)\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Tricksy(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) -> Slick(x))\n\nThundery(joseph)\n\nThundery(joseph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Ivy is dynamical. Connolly is not incomplete. All peevish people are incomplete. Furry people are peevish. Red people are alright. Ivy is not smart.", "logic": "\nDynamical(ivy)\nnot Incomplete(connolly)\nforall x (Peevish(x) -> Incomplete(x))\nforall x (Dynamical(x) -> Peevish(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Alright(x))\n\nnot Smart(ivy)\n\nnot Smart(ivy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "Clara is tumultuous. Anetta is not military. All antiviral people are military. Furry people are antiviral. Red people are unreleased. Anetta is tumultuous.", "logic": "\nTumultuous(clara)\nnot Military(anetta)\nforall x (Antiviral(x) -> Military(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Antiviral(x))\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> Unreleased(x))\n\nTumultuous(anetta)\n\nTumultuous(anetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-556"} {"premises": "The lyndell is ancillary. The barnard chunk the coriss. The coriss cause the lyndell. If the lyndell does not chase the barnard then the barnard cause the coriss. If someone chunk the barnard then the barnard is unsyllabic. If someone cause the lyndell then they see the barnard. If someone is cute and not ancillary then they are not capitate. If someone is backstage and capitate then they see the lyndell. If someone quiver the coriss then they are not backstage. The coriss cause the lyndell.", "logic": "\nAncillary(lyndell)\nChunk(barnard, coriss)\nCause(coriss, lyndell)\nnot Cause(lyndell, barnard) -> Cause(barnard, coriss)\nforall x (Chunk(x, barnard) -> Unsyllabic(barnard))\nforall x (Cause(x, lyndell) -> Chunk(x, barnard))\nforall x (Cute(x) and not Ancillary(x) -> not Capitate(x))\nforall x (Backstage(x) and Capitate(x) -> Chunk(x, lyndell))\nforall x (Quiver(x, coriss) -> not Backstage(x))\n\nCause(coriss, lyndell)\n\ntherefore Cause(coriss, lyndell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The jonis is remedial. The patel retread the dove. The dove munition the jonis. If the jonis does not chase the patel then the patel munition the dove. If someone retread the patel then the patel is outre. If someone munition the jonis then they see the patel. If someone is homemade and not remedial then they are not brawny. If someone is junior and brawny then they see the jonis. If someone consort the dove then they are not junior. The dove does not chase the jonis.", "logic": "\nRemedial(jonis)\nRetread(patel, dove)\nMunition(dove, jonis)\nnot Munition(jonis, patel) -> Munition(patel, dove)\nforall x (Retread(x, patel) -> Outre(patel))\nforall x (Munition(x, jonis) -> Retread(x, patel))\nforall x (Homemade(x) and not Remedial(x) -> not Brawny(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) and Brawny(x) -> Retread(x, jonis))\nforall x (Consort(x, dove) -> not Junior(x))\n\nnot Munition(dove, jonis)\n\ntherefore Munition(dove, jonis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The rochell is renewing. The adelina proscribe the clari. The clari stoke the rochell. If the rochell does not chase the adelina then the adelina stoke the clari. If someone proscribe the adelina then the adelina is nebular. If someone stoke the rochell then they see the adelina. If someone is hawkish and not renewing then they are not fogyish. If someone is quaint and fogyish then they see the rochell. If someone cinematize the clari then they are not quaint. The clari proscribe the adelina.", "logic": "\nRenewing(rochell)\nProscribe(adelina, clari)\nStoke(clari, rochell)\nnot Stoke(rochell, adelina) -> Stoke(adelina, clari)\nforall x (Proscribe(x, adelina) -> Nebular(adelina))\nforall x (Stoke(x, rochell) -> Proscribe(x, adelina))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and not Renewing(x) -> not Fogyish(x))\nforall x (Quaint(x) and Fogyish(x) -> Proscribe(x, rochell))\nforall x (Cinematize(x, clari) -> not Quaint(x))\n\nProscribe(clari, adelina)\n\nStoke(clari, rochell) and forall x (Stoke(x, rochell) -> Proscribe(x, adelina)) -> therefore Proscribe(clari, adelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The katharine is sterilized. The raymundo garner the stanleigh. The stanleigh libel the katharine. If the katharine does not chase the raymundo then the raymundo libel the stanleigh. If someone garner the raymundo then the raymundo is anodic. If someone libel the katharine then they see the raymundo. If someone is drafty and not sterilized then they are not repulsive. If someone is prurient and repulsive then they see the katharine. If someone slack the stanleigh then they are not prurient. The stanleigh does not see the raymundo.", "logic": "\nSterilized(katharine)\nGarner(raymundo, stanleigh)\nLibel(stanleigh, katharine)\nnot Libel(katharine, raymundo) -> Libel(raymundo, stanleigh)\nforall x (Garner(x, raymundo) -> Anodic(raymundo))\nforall x (Libel(x, katharine) -> Garner(x, raymundo))\nforall x (Drafty(x) and not Sterilized(x) -> not Repulsive(x))\nforall x (Prurient(x) and Repulsive(x) -> Garner(x, katharine))\nforall x (Slack(x, stanleigh) -> not Prurient(x))\n\nnot Garner(stanleigh, raymundo)\n\nLibel(stanleigh, katharine) and forall x (Libel(x, katharine) -> Garner(x, raymundo)) -> therefore Garner(stanleigh, raymundo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The conroy is glinting. The istvan ground the malcah. The malcah recede the conroy. If the conroy does not chase the istvan then the istvan recede the malcah. If someone ground the istvan then the istvan is prenominal. If someone recede the conroy then they see the istvan. If someone is ferrous and not glinting then they are not gustatory. If someone is rose and gustatory then they see the conroy. If someone upbraid the malcah then they are not rose. The istvan is prenominal.", "logic": "\nGlinting(conroy)\nGround(istvan, malcah)\nRecede(malcah, conroy)\nnot Recede(conroy, istvan) -> Recede(istvan, malcah)\nforall x (Ground(x, istvan) -> Prenominal(istvan))\nforall x (Recede(x, conroy) -> Ground(x, istvan))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) and not Glinting(x) -> not Gustatory(x))\nforall x (Rose(x) and Gustatory(x) -> Ground(x, conroy))\nforall x (Upbraid(x, malcah) -> not Rose(x))\n\nPrenominal(istvan)\n\nRecede(malcah, conroy) and forall x (Recede(x, conroy) -> Ground(x, istvan)) -> therefore Ground(malcah, istvan) Ground(malcah, istvan) and forall x (Ground(x, istvan) -> Prenominal(istvan)) -> therefore Prenominal(istvan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The vivyan is mucoidal. The felicity ballot the meghann. The meghann besot the vivyan. If the vivyan does not chase the felicity then the felicity besot the meghann. If someone ballot the felicity then the felicity is listless. If someone besot the vivyan then they see the felicity. If someone is gilt and not mucoidal then they are not aphanitic. If someone is afghan and aphanitic then they see the vivyan. If someone handbuild the meghann then they are not afghan. The felicity is not listless.", "logic": "\nMucoidal(vivyan)\nBallot(felicity, meghann)\nBesot(meghann, vivyan)\nnot Besot(vivyan, felicity) -> Besot(felicity, meghann)\nforall x (Ballot(x, felicity) -> Listless(felicity))\nforall x (Besot(x, vivyan) -> Ballot(x, felicity))\nforall x (Gilt(x) and not Mucoidal(x) -> not Aphanitic(x))\nforall x (Afghan(x) and Aphanitic(x) -> Ballot(x, vivyan))\nforall x (Handbuild(x, meghann) -> not Afghan(x))\n\nnot Listless(felicity)\n\nBesot(meghann, vivyan) and forall x (Besot(x, vivyan) -> Ballot(x, felicity)) -> therefore Ballot(meghann, felicity) Ballot(meghann, felicity) and forall x (Ballot(x, felicity) -> Listless(felicity)) -> therefore Listless(felicity)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The madelle is dyspnoeal. The loreen reorient the marget. The marget enrapture the madelle. If the madelle does not chase the loreen then the loreen enrapture the marget. If someone reorient the loreen then the loreen is artesian. If someone enrapture the madelle then they see the loreen. If someone is luculent and not dyspnoeal then they are not achenial. If someone is chylous and achenial then they see the madelle. If someone squirt the marget then they are not chylous. The marget does not see the madelle.", "logic": "\nDyspnoeal(madelle)\nReorient(loreen, marget)\nEnrapture(marget, madelle)\nnot Enrapture(madelle, loreen) -> Enrapture(loreen, marget)\nforall x (Reorient(x, loreen) -> Artesian(loreen))\nforall x (Enrapture(x, madelle) -> Reorient(x, loreen))\nforall x (Luculent(x) and not Dyspnoeal(x) -> not Achenial(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) and Achenial(x) -> Reorient(x, madelle))\nforall x (Squirt(x, marget) -> not Chylous(x))\n\nnot Reorient(marget, madelle)\n\nforall x (Chylous(x) and Achenial(x) -> Reorient(x, madelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The jewelle is cypriote. The selie scry the ursala. The ursala muss the jewelle. If the jewelle does not chase the selie then the selie muss the ursala. If someone scry the selie then the selie is inst. If someone muss the jewelle then they see the selie. If someone is buxom and not cypriote then they are not galvanic. If someone is honored and galvanic then they see the jewelle. If someone crochet the ursala then they are not honored. The jewelle scry the selie.", "logic": "\nCypriote(jewelle)\nScry(selie, ursala)\nMuss(ursala, jewelle)\nnot Muss(jewelle, selie) -> Muss(selie, ursala)\nforall x (Scry(x, selie) -> Inst(selie))\nforall x (Muss(x, jewelle) -> Scry(x, selie))\nforall x (Buxom(x) and not Cypriote(x) -> not Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Honored(x) and Galvanic(x) -> Scry(x, jewelle))\nforall x (Crochet(x, ursala) -> not Honored(x))\n\nScry(jewelle, selie)\n\nforall x (Muss(x, jewelle) -> Scry(x, selie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The eleanor is rosaceous. The lotti trade the xavier. The xavier plash the eleanor. If the eleanor does not chase the lotti then the lotti plash the xavier. If someone trade the lotti then the lotti is egyptian. If someone plash the eleanor then they see the lotti. If someone is improper and not rosaceous then they are not branchless. If someone is biotypic and branchless then they see the eleanor. If someone submerse the xavier then they are not biotypic. The eleanor does not see the eleanor.", "logic": "\nRosaceous(eleanor)\nTrade(lotti, xavier)\nPlash(xavier, eleanor)\nnot Plash(eleanor, lotti) -> Plash(lotti, xavier)\nforall x (Trade(x, lotti) -> Egyptian(lotti))\nforall x (Plash(x, eleanor) -> Trade(x, lotti))\nforall x (Improper(x) and not Rosaceous(x) -> not Branchless(x))\nforall x (Biotypic(x) and Branchless(x) -> Trade(x, eleanor))\nforall x (Submerse(x, xavier) -> not Biotypic(x))\n\nnot Trade(eleanor, eleanor)\n\nforall x (Biotypic(x) and Branchless(x) -> Trade(x, eleanor)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The virgie is tousled. The patrice aver the rivalee. The rivalee evoke the virgie. If the virgie does not chase the patrice then the patrice evoke the rivalee. If someone aver the patrice then the patrice is weeklong. If someone evoke the virgie then they see the patrice. If someone is flighty and not tousled then they are not dalmatian. If someone is unextended and dalmatian then they see the virgie. If someone course the rivalee then they are not unextended. The rivalee course the virgie.", "logic": "\nTousled(virgie)\nAver(patrice, rivalee)\nEvoke(rivalee, virgie)\nnot Evoke(virgie, patrice) -> Evoke(patrice, rivalee)\nforall x (Aver(x, patrice) -> Weeklong(patrice))\nforall x (Evoke(x, virgie) -> Aver(x, patrice))\nforall x (Flighty(x) and not Tousled(x) -> not Dalmatian(x))\nforall x (Unextended(x) and Dalmatian(x) -> Aver(x, virgie))\nforall x (Course(x, rivalee) -> not Unextended(x))\n\nCourse(rivalee, virgie)\n\nCourse(rivalee, virgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The othello is disyllabic. The gisela round the tabb. The tabb effeminize the othello. If the othello does not chase the gisela then the gisela effeminize the tabb. If someone round the gisela then the gisela is suety. If someone effeminize the othello then they see the gisela. If someone is mere and not disyllabic then they are not editorial. If someone is beggarly and editorial then they see the othello. If someone catechize the tabb then they are not beggarly. The othello does not visit the othello.", "logic": "\nDisyllabic(othello)\nRound(gisela, tabb)\nEffeminize(tabb, othello)\nnot Effeminize(othello, gisela) -> Effeminize(gisela, tabb)\nforall x (Round(x, gisela) -> Suety(gisela))\nforall x (Effeminize(x, othello) -> Round(x, gisela))\nforall x (Mere(x) and not Disyllabic(x) -> not Editorial(x))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) and Editorial(x) -> Round(x, othello))\nforall x (Catechize(x, tabb) -> not Beggarly(x))\n\nnot Catechize(othello, othello)\n\nnot Catechize(othello, othello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The ignazio is geometric. The berkeley slat the malvina. The malvina noise the ignazio. If the ignazio does not chase the berkeley then the berkeley noise the malvina. If someone slat the berkeley then the berkeley is sonsy. If someone noise the ignazio then they see the berkeley. If someone is profitable and not geometric then they are not incursive. If someone is araneidan and incursive then they see the ignazio. If someone toast the malvina then they are not araneidan. The malvina is sonsy.", "logic": "\nGeometric(ignazio)\nSlat(berkeley, malvina)\nNoise(malvina, ignazio)\nnot Noise(ignazio, berkeley) -> Noise(berkeley, malvina)\nforall x (Slat(x, berkeley) -> Sonsy(berkeley))\nforall x (Noise(x, ignazio) -> Slat(x, berkeley))\nforall x (Profitable(x) and not Geometric(x) -> not Incursive(x))\nforall x (Araneidan(x) and Incursive(x) -> Slat(x, ignazio))\nforall x (Toast(x, malvina) -> not Araneidan(x))\n\nSonsy(malvina)\n\nSonsy(malvina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "Phineas is not hispanic. Kory is cxxx. Sherwynd is not whiplike. Smart things are whiplike. If Kory is cxxx then Kory is hispanic. Sherwynd is not whiplike.", "logic": "\nnot Hispanic(phineas)\nCxxx(kory)\nnot Whiplike(sherwynd)\nforall x (Hispanic(x) -> Whiplike(x))\nCxxx(kory) -> Hispanic(kory)\n\nnot Whiplike(sherwynd)\n\ntherefore not Whiplike(sherwynd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Sinead is not dastard. Edna is hitlerian. Skipp is not packaged. Smart things are packaged. If Edna is hitlerian then Edna is dastard. Sinead is dastard.", "logic": "\nnot Dastard(sinead)\nHitlerian(edna)\nnot Packaged(skipp)\nforall x (Dastard(x) -> Packaged(x))\nHitlerian(edna) -> Dastard(edna)\n\nDastard(sinead)\n\ntherefore not Dastard(sinead)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Gretchen is not corrigible. Harley is legged. Jilly is not effectual. Smart things are effectual. If Harley is legged then Harley is corrigible. Harley is corrigible.", "logic": "\nnot Corrigible(gretchen)\nLegged(harley)\nnot Effectual(jilly)\nforall x (Corrigible(x) -> Effectual(x))\nLegged(harley) -> Corrigible(harley)\n\nCorrigible(harley)\n\nLegged(harley) and Legged(harley) -> Corrigible(harley) -> therefore Corrigible(harley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Laural is not stemless. Pooh is subversive. Ulrika is not timorous. Smart things are timorous. If Pooh is subversive then Pooh is stemless. Pooh is not stemless.", "logic": "\nnot Stemless(laural)\nSubversive(pooh)\nnot Timorous(ulrika)\nforall x (Stemless(x) -> Timorous(x))\nSubversive(pooh) -> Stemless(pooh)\n\nnot Stemless(pooh)\n\nSubversive(pooh) and Subversive(pooh) -> Stemless(pooh) -> therefore Stemless(pooh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Rowland is not misbegot. Saba is flighty. Fox is not strangled. Smart things are strangled. If Saba is flighty then Saba is misbegot. Saba is strangled.", "logic": "\nnot Misbegot(rowland)\nFlighty(saba)\nnot Strangled(fox)\nforall x (Misbegot(x) -> Strangled(x))\nFlighty(saba) -> Misbegot(saba)\n\nStrangled(saba)\n\nFlighty(saba) and Flighty(saba) -> Misbegot(saba) -> therefore Misbegot(saba) Misbegot(saba) and forall x (Misbegot(x) -> Strangled(x)) -> therefore Strangled(saba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Roslyn is not capetian. Nicholas is indie. Tamiko is not sourish. Smart things are sourish. If Nicholas is indie then Nicholas is capetian. Nicholas is not sourish.", "logic": "\nnot Capetian(roslyn)\nIndie(nicholas)\nnot Sourish(tamiko)\nforall x (Capetian(x) -> Sourish(x))\nIndie(nicholas) -> Capetian(nicholas)\n\nnot Sourish(nicholas)\n\nIndie(nicholas) and Indie(nicholas) -> Capetian(nicholas) -> therefore Capetian(nicholas) Capetian(nicholas) and forall x (Capetian(x) -> Sourish(x)) -> therefore Sourish(nicholas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Anallese is not libidinal. Irvin is cretinous. Gunilla is not gutsy. Smart things are gutsy. If Irvin is cretinous then Irvin is libidinal. Anallese is not gutsy.", "logic": "\nnot Libidinal(anallese)\nCretinous(irvin)\nnot Gutsy(gunilla)\nforall x (Libidinal(x) -> Gutsy(x))\nCretinous(irvin) -> Libidinal(irvin)\n\nnot Gutsy(anallese)\n\nforall x (Libidinal(x) -> Gutsy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Wes is not plaintive. Dorolisa is tricolor. Bel is not marketable. Smart things are marketable. If Dorolisa is tricolor then Dorolisa is plaintive. Bel is plaintive.", "logic": "\nnot Plaintive(wes)\nTricolor(dorolisa)\nnot Marketable(bel)\nforall x (Plaintive(x) -> Marketable(x))\nTricolor(dorolisa) -> Plaintive(dorolisa)\n\nPlaintive(bel)\n\nPlaintive(bel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Sterne is not banging. Claudina is nippy. Leodora is not rudderless. Smart things are rudderless. If Claudina is nippy then Claudina is banging. Leodora is not quiet.", "logic": "\nnot Banging(sterne)\nNippy(claudina)\nnot Rudderless(leodora)\nforall x (Banging(x) -> Rudderless(x))\nNippy(claudina) -> Banging(claudina)\n\nnot Quiet(leodora)\n\nnot Quiet(leodora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Udell is not edentate. Dido is resistive. Lorna is not escaped. Smart things are escaped. If Dido is resistive then Dido is edentate. Lorna is round.", "logic": "\nnot Edentate(udell)\nResistive(dido)\nnot Escaped(lorna)\nforall x (Edentate(x) -> Escaped(x))\nResistive(dido) -> Edentate(dido)\n\nRound(lorna)\n\nRound(lorna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Laurella is not gambian. Fey is pervasive. Zarah is not answerable. Smart things are answerable. If Fey is pervasive then Fey is gambian. Laurella is not pervasive.", "logic": "\nnot Gambian(laurella)\nPervasive(fey)\nnot Answerable(zarah)\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> Answerable(x))\nPervasive(fey) -> Gambian(fey)\n\nnot Pervasive(laurella)\n\nnot Pervasive(laurella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "Dasie is not egregious. Shantee is startled. Wilfred is not crannied. Smart things are crannied. If Shantee is startled then Shantee is egregious. Dasie is young.", "logic": "\nnot Egregious(dasie)\nStartled(shantee)\nnot Crannied(wilfred)\nforall x (Egregious(x) -> Crannied(x))\nStartled(shantee) -> Egregious(shantee)\n\nYoung(dasie)\n\nYoung(dasie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-630"} {"premises": "The gillie accumulate the nichols. The gillie is blanched. The gillie is planetary. The gillie is not sanitized. The gillie is not swarthy. The gillie swish the nichols. The gillie print the nichols. The nichols accumulate the gillie. The nichols is entozoan. The nichols is blanched. The nichols is sanitized. The nichols swish the gillie. If something is sanitized and planetary then it accumulate the gillie. If something accumulate the nichols then it print the gillie. If something is blanched then it accumulate the nichols. If something is entozoan then it swish the nichols. If something swish the gillie and the gillie does not chase the nichols then the gillie is entozoan. If something swish the nichols and the nichols is not swarthy then the nichols is entozoan. The gillie swish the nichols.", "logic": "\nAccumulate(gillie, nichols)\nBlanched(gillie)\nPlanetary(gillie)\nnot Sanitized(gillie)\nnot Swarthy(gillie)\nSwish(gillie, nichols)\nPrint(gillie, nichols)\nAccumulate(nichols, gillie)\nEntozoan(nichols)\nBlanched(nichols)\nSanitized(nichols)\nSwish(nichols, gillie)\nforall x (Sanitized(x) and Planetary(x) -> Accumulate(x, gillie))\nforall x (Accumulate(x, nichols) -> Print(x, gillie))\nforall x (Blanched(x) -> Accumulate(x, nichols))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Swish(x, nichols))\nforall x (Swish(x, gillie) and not Accumulate(gillie, nichols) -> Entozoan(gillie))\nforall x (Swish(x, nichols) and not Swarthy(nichols) -> Entozoan(nichols))\n\nSwish(gillie, nichols)\n\ntherefore Swish(gillie, nichols)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The vern rake the murdock. The vern is spattered. The vern is antiviral. The vern is not lordotic. The vern is not callable. The vern visa the murdock. The vern recrudesce the murdock. The murdock rake the vern. The murdock is endoergic. The murdock is spattered. The murdock is lordotic. The murdock visa the vern. If something is lordotic and antiviral then it rake the vern. If something rake the murdock then it recrudesce the vern. If something is spattered then it rake the murdock. If something is endoergic then it visa the murdock. If something visa the vern and the vern does not chase the murdock then the vern is endoergic. If something visa the murdock and the murdock is not callable then the murdock is endoergic. The murdock is not endoergic.", "logic": "\nRake(vern, murdock)\nSpattered(vern)\nAntiviral(vern)\nnot Lordotic(vern)\nnot Callable(vern)\nVisa(vern, murdock)\nRecrudesce(vern, murdock)\nRake(murdock, vern)\nEndoergic(murdock)\nSpattered(murdock)\nLordotic(murdock)\nVisa(murdock, vern)\nforall x (Lordotic(x) and Antiviral(x) -> Rake(x, vern))\nforall x (Rake(x, murdock) -> Recrudesce(x, vern))\nforall x (Spattered(x) -> Rake(x, murdock))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> Visa(x, murdock))\nforall x (Visa(x, vern) and not Rake(vern, murdock) -> Endoergic(vern))\nforall x (Visa(x, murdock) and not Callable(murdock) -> Endoergic(murdock))\n\nnot Endoergic(murdock)\n\ntherefore Endoergic(murdock)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The rodi cachinnate the gav. The rodi is attainable. The rodi is slicked. The rodi is not deflective. The rodi is not vacuolate. The rodi chaff the gav. The rodi volatilise the gav. The gav cachinnate the rodi. The gav is emeritus. The gav is attainable. The gav is deflective. The gav chaff the rodi. If something is deflective and slicked then it cachinnate the rodi. If something cachinnate the gav then it volatilise the rodi. If something is attainable then it cachinnate the gav. If something is emeritus then it chaff the gav. If something chaff the rodi and the rodi does not chase the gav then the rodi is emeritus. If something chaff the gav and the gav is not vacuolate then the gav is emeritus. The gav chaff the gav.", "logic": "\nCachinnate(rodi, gav)\nAttainable(rodi)\nSlicked(rodi)\nnot Deflective(rodi)\nnot Vacuolate(rodi)\nChaff(rodi, gav)\nVolatilise(rodi, gav)\nCachinnate(gav, rodi)\nEmeritus(gav)\nAttainable(gav)\nDeflective(gav)\nChaff(gav, rodi)\nforall x (Deflective(x) and Slicked(x) -> Cachinnate(x, rodi))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, gav) -> Volatilise(x, rodi))\nforall x (Attainable(x) -> Cachinnate(x, gav))\nforall x (Emeritus(x) -> Chaff(x, gav))\nforall x (Chaff(x, rodi) and not Cachinnate(rodi, gav) -> Emeritus(rodi))\nforall x (Chaff(x, gav) and not Vacuolate(gav) -> Emeritus(gav))\n\nChaff(gav, gav)\n\nEmeritus(gav) and forall x (Emeritus(x) -> Chaff(x, gav)) -> therefore Chaff(gav, gav)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The barr diabolize the frank. The barr is oldline. The barr is nonthermal. The barr is not oversexed. The barr is not deciding. The barr militarize the frank. The barr degas the frank. The frank diabolize the barr. The frank is chuffed. The frank is oldline. The frank is oversexed. The frank militarize the barr. If something is oversexed and nonthermal then it diabolize the barr. If something diabolize the frank then it degas the barr. If something is oldline then it diabolize the frank. If something is chuffed then it militarize the frank. If something militarize the barr and the barr does not chase the frank then the barr is chuffed. If something militarize the frank and the frank is not deciding then the frank is chuffed. The frank does not need the frank.", "logic": "\nDiabolize(barr, frank)\nOldline(barr)\nNonthermal(barr)\nnot Oversexed(barr)\nnot Deciding(barr)\nMilitarize(barr, frank)\nDegas(barr, frank)\nDiabolize(frank, barr)\nChuffed(frank)\nOldline(frank)\nOversexed(frank)\nMilitarize(frank, barr)\nforall x (Oversexed(x) and Nonthermal(x) -> Diabolize(x, barr))\nforall x (Diabolize(x, frank) -> Degas(x, barr))\nforall x (Oldline(x) -> Diabolize(x, frank))\nforall x (Chuffed(x) -> Militarize(x, frank))\nforall x (Militarize(x, barr) and not Diabolize(barr, frank) -> Chuffed(barr))\nforall x (Militarize(x, frank) and not Deciding(frank) -> Chuffed(frank))\n\nnot Militarize(frank, frank)\n\nChuffed(frank) and forall x (Chuffed(x) -> Militarize(x, frank)) -> therefore Militarize(frank, frank)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The agretha moralize the lauryn. The agretha is preeminent. The agretha is neuronic. The agretha is not twenty. The agretha is not mycenaean. The agretha pollute the lauryn. The agretha entertain the lauryn. The lauryn moralize the agretha. The lauryn is zymotic. The lauryn is preeminent. The lauryn is twenty. The lauryn pollute the agretha. If something is twenty and neuronic then it moralize the agretha. If something moralize the lauryn then it entertain the agretha. If something is preeminent then it moralize the lauryn. If something is zymotic then it pollute the lauryn. If something pollute the agretha and the agretha does not chase the lauryn then the agretha is zymotic. If something pollute the lauryn and the lauryn is not mycenaean then the lauryn is zymotic. The lauryn entertain the agretha.", "logic": "\nMoralize(agretha, lauryn)\nPreeminent(agretha)\nNeuronic(agretha)\nnot Twenty(agretha)\nnot Mycenaean(agretha)\nPollute(agretha, lauryn)\nEntertain(agretha, lauryn)\nMoralize(lauryn, agretha)\nZymotic(lauryn)\nPreeminent(lauryn)\nTwenty(lauryn)\nPollute(lauryn, agretha)\nforall x (Twenty(x) and Neuronic(x) -> Moralize(x, agretha))\nforall x (Moralize(x, lauryn) -> Entertain(x, agretha))\nforall x (Preeminent(x) -> Moralize(x, lauryn))\nforall x (Zymotic(x) -> Pollute(x, lauryn))\nforall x (Pollute(x, agretha) and not Moralize(agretha, lauryn) -> Zymotic(agretha))\nforall x (Pollute(x, lauryn) and not Mycenaean(lauryn) -> Zymotic(lauryn))\n\nEntertain(lauryn, agretha)\n\nPreeminent(lauryn) and forall x (Preeminent(x) -> Moralize(x, lauryn)) -> therefore Moralize(lauryn, lauryn) Moralize(lauryn, lauryn) and forall x (Moralize(x, lauryn) -> Entertain(x, agretha)) -> therefore Entertain(lauryn, agretha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The herculie unbar the ronica. The herculie is nonionized. The herculie is empowered. The herculie is not macro. The herculie is not graceless. The herculie reorganise the ronica. The herculie ferment the ronica. The ronica unbar the herculie. The ronica is xenogeneic. The ronica is nonionized. The ronica is macro. The ronica reorganise the herculie. If something is macro and empowered then it unbar the herculie. If something unbar the ronica then it ferment the herculie. If something is nonionized then it unbar the ronica. If something is xenogeneic then it reorganise the ronica. If something reorganise the herculie and the herculie does not chase the ronica then the herculie is xenogeneic. If something reorganise the ronica and the ronica is not graceless then the ronica is xenogeneic. The ronica does not visit the herculie.", "logic": "\nUnbar(herculie, ronica)\nNonionized(herculie)\nEmpowered(herculie)\nnot Macro(herculie)\nnot Graceless(herculie)\nReorganise(herculie, ronica)\nFerment(herculie, ronica)\nUnbar(ronica, herculie)\nXenogeneic(ronica)\nNonionized(ronica)\nMacro(ronica)\nReorganise(ronica, herculie)\nforall x (Macro(x) and Empowered(x) -> Unbar(x, herculie))\nforall x (Unbar(x, ronica) -> Ferment(x, herculie))\nforall x (Nonionized(x) -> Unbar(x, ronica))\nforall x (Xenogeneic(x) -> Reorganise(x, ronica))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, herculie) and not Unbar(herculie, ronica) -> Xenogeneic(herculie))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, ronica) and not Graceless(ronica) -> Xenogeneic(ronica))\n\nnot Ferment(ronica, herculie)\n\nNonionized(ronica) and forall x (Nonionized(x) -> Unbar(x, ronica)) -> therefore Unbar(ronica, ronica) Unbar(ronica, ronica) and forall x (Unbar(x, ronica) -> Ferment(x, herculie)) -> therefore Ferment(ronica, herculie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The carlena uproot the barnabas. The carlena is azure. The carlena is workaday. The carlena is not metastatic. The carlena is not eligible. The carlena scuttle the barnabas. The carlena peach the barnabas. The barnabas uproot the carlena. The barnabas is frankish. The barnabas is azure. The barnabas is metastatic. The barnabas scuttle the carlena. If something is metastatic and workaday then it uproot the carlena. If something uproot the barnabas then it peach the carlena. If something is azure then it uproot the barnabas. If something is frankish then it scuttle the barnabas. If something scuttle the carlena and the carlena does not chase the barnabas then the carlena is frankish. If something scuttle the barnabas and the barnabas is not eligible then the barnabas is frankish. The carlena does not chase the carlena.", "logic": "\nUproot(carlena, barnabas)\nAzure(carlena)\nWorkaday(carlena)\nnot Metastatic(carlena)\nnot Eligible(carlena)\nScuttle(carlena, barnabas)\nPeach(carlena, barnabas)\nUproot(barnabas, carlena)\nFrankish(barnabas)\nAzure(barnabas)\nMetastatic(barnabas)\nScuttle(barnabas, carlena)\nforall x (Metastatic(x) and Workaday(x) -> Uproot(x, carlena))\nforall x (Uproot(x, barnabas) -> Peach(x, carlena))\nforall x (Azure(x) -> Uproot(x, barnabas))\nforall x (Frankish(x) -> Scuttle(x, barnabas))\nforall x (Scuttle(x, carlena) and not Uproot(carlena, barnabas) -> Frankish(carlena))\nforall x (Scuttle(x, barnabas) and not Eligible(barnabas) -> Frankish(barnabas))\n\nnot Uproot(carlena, carlena)\n\nforall x (Metastatic(x) and Workaday(x) -> Uproot(x, carlena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The hayes resew the freddie. The hayes is beamy. The hayes is suppliant. The hayes is not merging. The hayes is not mauritian. The hayes presume the freddie. The hayes regale the freddie. The freddie resew the hayes. The freddie is martian. The freddie is beamy. The freddie is merging. The freddie presume the hayes. If something is merging and suppliant then it resew the hayes. If something resew the freddie then it regale the hayes. If something is beamy then it resew the freddie. If something is martian then it presume the freddie. If something presume the hayes and the hayes does not chase the freddie then the hayes is martian. If something presume the freddie and the freddie is not mauritian then the freddie is martian. The hayes is martian.", "logic": "\nResew(hayes, freddie)\nBeamy(hayes)\nSuppliant(hayes)\nnot Merging(hayes)\nnot Mauritian(hayes)\nPresume(hayes, freddie)\nRegale(hayes, freddie)\nResew(freddie, hayes)\nMartian(freddie)\nBeamy(freddie)\nMerging(freddie)\nPresume(freddie, hayes)\nforall x (Merging(x) and Suppliant(x) -> Resew(x, hayes))\nforall x (Resew(x, freddie) -> Regale(x, hayes))\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Resew(x, freddie))\nforall x (Martian(x) -> Presume(x, freddie))\nforall x (Presume(x, hayes) and not Resew(hayes, freddie) -> Martian(hayes))\nforall x (Presume(x, freddie) and not Mauritian(freddie) -> Martian(freddie))\n\nMartian(hayes)\n\nforall x (Presume(x, hayes) and not Resew(hayes, freddie) -> Martian(hayes)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The jillana distrain the leon. The jillana is branching. The jillana is aery. The jillana is not balzacian. The jillana is not naiant. The jillana anchor the leon. The jillana importune the leon. The leon distrain the jillana. The leon is misused. The leon is branching. The leon is balzacian. The leon anchor the jillana. If something is balzacian and aery then it distrain the jillana. If something distrain the leon then it importune the jillana. If something is branching then it distrain the leon. If something is misused then it anchor the leon. If something anchor the jillana and the jillana does not chase the leon then the jillana is misused. If something anchor the leon and the leon is not naiant then the leon is misused. The leon is not naiant.", "logic": "\nDistrain(jillana, leon)\nBranching(jillana)\nAery(jillana)\nnot Balzacian(jillana)\nnot Naiant(jillana)\nAnchor(jillana, leon)\nImportune(jillana, leon)\nDistrain(leon, jillana)\nMisused(leon)\nBranching(leon)\nBalzacian(leon)\nAnchor(leon, jillana)\nforall x (Balzacian(x) and Aery(x) -> Distrain(x, jillana))\nforall x (Distrain(x, leon) -> Importune(x, jillana))\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Distrain(x, leon))\nforall x (Misused(x) -> Anchor(x, leon))\nforall x (Anchor(x, jillana) and not Distrain(jillana, leon) -> Misused(jillana))\nforall x (Anchor(x, leon) and not Naiant(leon) -> Misused(leon))\n\nnot Naiant(leon)\n\nnot Naiant(leon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The shalom submerge the abra. The shalom is perinatal. The shalom is booted. The shalom is not glutinous. The shalom is not acquitted. The shalom enjoy the abra. The shalom mildew the abra. The abra submerge the shalom. The abra is skew. The abra is perinatal. The abra is glutinous. The abra enjoy the shalom. If something is glutinous and booted then it submerge the shalom. If something submerge the abra then it mildew the shalom. If something is perinatal then it submerge the abra. If something is skew then it enjoy the abra. If something enjoy the shalom and the shalom does not chase the abra then the shalom is skew. If something enjoy the abra and the abra is not acquitted then the abra is skew. The abra is booted.", "logic": "\nSubmerge(shalom, abra)\nPerinatal(shalom)\nBooted(shalom)\nnot Glutinous(shalom)\nnot Acquitted(shalom)\nEnjoy(shalom, abra)\nMildew(shalom, abra)\nSubmerge(abra, shalom)\nSkew(abra)\nPerinatal(abra)\nGlutinous(abra)\nEnjoy(abra, shalom)\nforall x (Glutinous(x) and Booted(x) -> Submerge(x, shalom))\nforall x (Submerge(x, abra) -> Mildew(x, shalom))\nforall x (Perinatal(x) -> Submerge(x, abra))\nforall x (Skew(x) -> Enjoy(x, abra))\nforall x (Enjoy(x, shalom) and not Submerge(shalom, abra) -> Skew(shalom))\nforall x (Enjoy(x, abra) and not Acquitted(abra) -> Skew(abra))\n\nBooted(abra)\n\nBooted(abra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The alyce inure the jamie. The alyce is tangible. The alyce is mistreated. The alyce is not slavish. The alyce is not tiring. The alyce motor the jamie. The alyce misbelieve the jamie. The jamie inure the alyce. The jamie is unsoured. The jamie is tangible. The jamie is slavish. The jamie motor the alyce. If something is slavish and mistreated then it inure the alyce. If something inure the jamie then it misbelieve the alyce. If something is tangible then it inure the jamie. If something is unsoured then it motor the jamie. If something motor the alyce and the alyce does not chase the jamie then the alyce is unsoured. If something motor the jamie and the jamie is not tiring then the jamie is unsoured. The jamie does not visit the jamie.", "logic": "\nInure(alyce, jamie)\nTangible(alyce)\nMistreated(alyce)\nnot Slavish(alyce)\nnot Tiring(alyce)\nMotor(alyce, jamie)\nMisbelieve(alyce, jamie)\nInure(jamie, alyce)\nUnsoured(jamie)\nTangible(jamie)\nSlavish(jamie)\nMotor(jamie, alyce)\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Mistreated(x) -> Inure(x, alyce))\nforall x (Inure(x, jamie) -> Misbelieve(x, alyce))\nforall x (Tangible(x) -> Inure(x, jamie))\nforall x (Unsoured(x) -> Motor(x, jamie))\nforall x (Motor(x, alyce) and not Inure(alyce, jamie) -> Unsoured(alyce))\nforall x (Motor(x, jamie) and not Tiring(jamie) -> Unsoured(jamie))\n\nnot Misbelieve(jamie, jamie)\n\nnot Misbelieve(jamie, jamie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The junie mumble the ianthe. The junie is rattling. The junie is champion. The junie is not favorite. The junie is not fired. The junie succor the ianthe. The junie incase the ianthe. The ianthe mumble the junie. The ianthe is laryngeal. The ianthe is rattling. The ianthe is favorite. The ianthe succor the junie. If something is favorite and champion then it mumble the junie. If something mumble the ianthe then it incase the junie. If something is rattling then it mumble the ianthe. If something is laryngeal then it succor the ianthe. If something succor the junie and the junie does not chase the ianthe then the junie is laryngeal. If something succor the ianthe and the ianthe is not fired then the ianthe is laryngeal. The junie succor the junie.", "logic": "\nMumble(junie, ianthe)\nRattling(junie)\nChampion(junie)\nnot Favorite(junie)\nnot Fired(junie)\nSuccor(junie, ianthe)\nIncase(junie, ianthe)\nMumble(ianthe, junie)\nLaryngeal(ianthe)\nRattling(ianthe)\nFavorite(ianthe)\nSuccor(ianthe, junie)\nforall x (Favorite(x) and Champion(x) -> Mumble(x, junie))\nforall x (Mumble(x, ianthe) -> Incase(x, junie))\nforall x (Rattling(x) -> Mumble(x, ianthe))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Succor(x, ianthe))\nforall x (Succor(x, junie) and not Mumble(junie, ianthe) -> Laryngeal(junie))\nforall x (Succor(x, ianthe) and not Fired(ianthe) -> Laryngeal(ianthe))\n\nSuccor(junie, junie)\n\nSuccor(junie, junie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-47"} {"premises": "The nanice militarize the tootsie. The nanice preachify the tiffie. The nanice is hooflike. The nanice summit the tiffie. The tiffie militarize the tootsie. The tiffie preachify the tootsie. The tiffie is postmortal. The tiffie is harmonized. The tiffie is civilized. The tiffie summit the tootsie. The tootsie militarize the nanice. The tootsie militarize the tiffie. The tootsie is postmortal. The tootsie is harmonized. The tootsie summit the tiffie. If someone is civilized and they need the nanice then they need the tootsie. If someone preachify the tootsie and they are postmortal then they need the tiffie. If someone summit the nanice then the nanice is postmortal. If someone militarize the tiffie and the tiffie is civilized then the tiffie preachify the nanice. If someone is hooflike and postmortal then they eat the tootsie. If someone preachify the tootsie then the tootsie is hooflike. If someone is frowsy then they eat the nanice. If the nanice summit the tootsie and the nanice summit the tiffie then the tootsie preachify the nanice. The nanice summit the tiffie.", "logic": "\nMilitarize(nanice, tootsie)\nPreachify(nanice, tiffie)\nHooflike(nanice)\nSummit(nanice, tiffie)\nMilitarize(tiffie, tootsie)\nPreachify(tiffie, tootsie)\nPostmortal(tiffie)\nHarmonized(tiffie)\nCivilized(tiffie)\nSummit(tiffie, tootsie)\nMilitarize(tootsie, nanice)\nMilitarize(tootsie, tiffie)\nPostmortal(tootsie)\nHarmonized(tootsie)\nSummit(tootsie, tiffie)\nforall x (Civilized(x) and Summit(x, nanice) -> Summit(x, tootsie))\nforall x (Preachify(x, tootsie) and Postmortal(x) -> Summit(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Summit(x, nanice) -> Postmortal(nanice))\nforall x (Militarize(x, tiffie) and Civilized(tiffie) -> Preachify(tiffie, nanice))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and Postmortal(x) -> Preachify(x, tootsie))\nforall x (Preachify(x, tootsie) -> Hooflike(tootsie))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Preachify(x, nanice))\nSummit(nanice, tootsie) and Summit(nanice, tiffie) -> Preachify(tootsie, nanice)\n\nSummit(nanice, tiffie)\n\ntherefore Summit(nanice, tiffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The douglis notate the loralee. The douglis submarine the mahmud. The douglis is crescendo. The douglis retrofit the mahmud. The mahmud notate the loralee. The mahmud submarine the loralee. The mahmud is sweeping. The mahmud is grisly. The mahmud is quickset. The mahmud retrofit the loralee. The loralee notate the douglis. The loralee notate the mahmud. The loralee is sweeping. The loralee is grisly. The loralee retrofit the mahmud. If someone is quickset and they need the douglis then they need the loralee. If someone submarine the loralee and they are sweeping then they need the mahmud. If someone retrofit the douglis then the douglis is sweeping. If someone notate the mahmud and the mahmud is quickset then the mahmud submarine the douglis. If someone is crescendo and sweeping then they eat the loralee. If someone submarine the loralee then the loralee is crescendo. If someone is mournful then they eat the douglis. If the douglis retrofit the loralee and the douglis retrofit the mahmud then the loralee submarine the douglis. The loralee does not chase the douglis.", "logic": "\nNotate(douglis, loralee)\nSubmarine(douglis, mahmud)\nCrescendo(douglis)\nRetrofit(douglis, mahmud)\nNotate(mahmud, loralee)\nSubmarine(mahmud, loralee)\nSweeping(mahmud)\nGrisly(mahmud)\nQuickset(mahmud)\nRetrofit(mahmud, loralee)\nNotate(loralee, douglis)\nNotate(loralee, mahmud)\nSweeping(loralee)\nGrisly(loralee)\nRetrofit(loralee, mahmud)\nforall x (Quickset(x) and Retrofit(x, douglis) -> Retrofit(x, loralee))\nforall x (Submarine(x, loralee) and Sweeping(x) -> Retrofit(x, mahmud))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, douglis) -> Sweeping(douglis))\nforall x (Notate(x, mahmud) and Quickset(mahmud) -> Submarine(mahmud, douglis))\nforall x (Crescendo(x) and Sweeping(x) -> Submarine(x, loralee))\nforall x (Submarine(x, loralee) -> Crescendo(loralee))\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Submarine(x, douglis))\nRetrofit(douglis, loralee) and Retrofit(douglis, mahmud) -> Submarine(loralee, douglis)\n\nnot Notate(loralee, douglis)\n\ntherefore Notate(loralee, douglis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The shoshana proffer the charisse. The shoshana suntan the dotti. The shoshana is equal. The shoshana lave the dotti. The dotti proffer the charisse. The dotti suntan the charisse. The dotti is credulous. The dotti is fledgeless. The dotti is discreet. The dotti lave the charisse. The charisse proffer the shoshana. The charisse proffer the dotti. The charisse is credulous. The charisse is fledgeless. The charisse lave the dotti. If someone is discreet and they need the shoshana then they need the charisse. If someone suntan the charisse and they are credulous then they need the dotti. If someone lave the shoshana then the shoshana is credulous. If someone proffer the dotti and the dotti is discreet then the dotti suntan the shoshana. If someone is equal and credulous then they eat the charisse. If someone suntan the charisse then the charisse is equal. If someone is various then they eat the shoshana. If the shoshana lave the charisse and the shoshana lave the dotti then the charisse suntan the shoshana. The dotti lave the dotti.", "logic": "\nProffer(shoshana, charisse)\nSuntan(shoshana, dotti)\nEqual(shoshana)\nLave(shoshana, dotti)\nProffer(dotti, charisse)\nSuntan(dotti, charisse)\nCredulous(dotti)\nFledgeless(dotti)\nDiscreet(dotti)\nLave(dotti, charisse)\nProffer(charisse, shoshana)\nProffer(charisse, dotti)\nCredulous(charisse)\nFledgeless(charisse)\nLave(charisse, dotti)\nforall x (Discreet(x) and Lave(x, shoshana) -> Lave(x, charisse))\nforall x (Suntan(x, charisse) and Credulous(x) -> Lave(x, dotti))\nforall x (Lave(x, shoshana) -> Credulous(shoshana))\nforall x (Proffer(x, dotti) and Discreet(dotti) -> Suntan(dotti, shoshana))\nforall x (Equal(x) and Credulous(x) -> Suntan(x, charisse))\nforall x (Suntan(x, charisse) -> Equal(charisse))\nforall x (Various(x) -> Suntan(x, shoshana))\nLave(shoshana, charisse) and Lave(shoshana, dotti) -> Suntan(charisse, shoshana)\n\nLave(dotti, dotti)\n\nSuntan(dotti, charisse) and Credulous(dotti) and forall x (Suntan(x, charisse) and Credulous(x) -> Lave(x, dotti)) -> therefore Lave(dotti, dotti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The sylvie granulate the collin. The sylvie temper the laverna. The sylvie is deserted. The sylvie bray the laverna. The laverna granulate the collin. The laverna temper the collin. The laverna is cypriote. The laverna is resilient. The laverna is pyknotic. The laverna bray the collin. The collin granulate the sylvie. The collin granulate the laverna. The collin is cypriote. The collin is resilient. The collin bray the laverna. If someone is pyknotic and they need the sylvie then they need the collin. If someone temper the collin and they are cypriote then they need the laverna. If someone bray the sylvie then the sylvie is cypriote. If someone granulate the laverna and the laverna is pyknotic then the laverna temper the sylvie. If someone is deserted and cypriote then they eat the collin. If someone temper the collin then the collin is deserted. If someone is undreamt then they eat the sylvie. If the sylvie bray the collin and the sylvie bray the laverna then the collin temper the sylvie. The laverna does not need the laverna.", "logic": "\nGranulate(sylvie, collin)\nTemper(sylvie, laverna)\nDeserted(sylvie)\nBray(sylvie, laverna)\nGranulate(laverna, collin)\nTemper(laverna, collin)\nCypriote(laverna)\nResilient(laverna)\nPyknotic(laverna)\nBray(laverna, collin)\nGranulate(collin, sylvie)\nGranulate(collin, laverna)\nCypriote(collin)\nResilient(collin)\nBray(collin, laverna)\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) and Bray(x, sylvie) -> Bray(x, collin))\nforall x (Temper(x, collin) and Cypriote(x) -> Bray(x, laverna))\nforall x (Bray(x, sylvie) -> Cypriote(sylvie))\nforall x (Granulate(x, laverna) and Pyknotic(laverna) -> Temper(laverna, sylvie))\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Cypriote(x) -> Temper(x, collin))\nforall x (Temper(x, collin) -> Deserted(collin))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Temper(x, sylvie))\nBray(sylvie, collin) and Bray(sylvie, laverna) -> Temper(collin, sylvie)\n\nnot Bray(laverna, laverna)\n\nTemper(laverna, collin) and Cypriote(laverna) and forall x (Temper(x, collin) and Cypriote(x) -> Bray(x, laverna)) -> therefore Bray(laverna, laverna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The martita blither the dwayne. The martita challenge the rebecca. The martita is null. The martita backdate the rebecca. The rebecca blither the dwayne. The rebecca challenge the dwayne. The rebecca is promotive. The rebecca is corrective. The rebecca is natural. The rebecca backdate the dwayne. The dwayne blither the martita. The dwayne blither the rebecca. The dwayne is promotive. The dwayne is corrective. The dwayne backdate the rebecca. If someone is natural and they need the martita then they need the dwayne. If someone challenge the dwayne and they are promotive then they need the rebecca. If someone backdate the martita then the martita is promotive. If someone blither the rebecca and the rebecca is natural then the rebecca challenge the martita. If someone is null and promotive then they eat the dwayne. If someone challenge the dwayne then the dwayne is null. If someone is heathlike then they eat the martita. If the martita backdate the dwayne and the martita backdate the rebecca then the dwayne challenge the martita. The dwayne challenge the dwayne.", "logic": "\nBlither(martita, dwayne)\nChallenge(martita, rebecca)\nNull(martita)\nBackdate(martita, rebecca)\nBlither(rebecca, dwayne)\nChallenge(rebecca, dwayne)\nPromotive(rebecca)\nCorrective(rebecca)\nNatural(rebecca)\nBackdate(rebecca, dwayne)\nBlither(dwayne, martita)\nBlither(dwayne, rebecca)\nPromotive(dwayne)\nCorrective(dwayne)\nBackdate(dwayne, rebecca)\nforall x (Natural(x) and Backdate(x, martita) -> Backdate(x, dwayne))\nforall x (Challenge(x, dwayne) and Promotive(x) -> Backdate(x, rebecca))\nforall x (Backdate(x, martita) -> Promotive(martita))\nforall x (Blither(x, rebecca) and Natural(rebecca) -> Challenge(rebecca, martita))\nforall x (Null(x) and Promotive(x) -> Challenge(x, dwayne))\nforall x (Challenge(x, dwayne) -> Null(dwayne))\nforall x (Heathlike(x) -> Challenge(x, martita))\nBackdate(martita, dwayne) and Backdate(martita, rebecca) -> Challenge(dwayne, martita)\n\nChallenge(dwayne, dwayne)\n\nChallenge(rebecca, dwayne) and forall x (Challenge(x, dwayne) -> Null(dwayne)) -> therefore Null(dwayne) Null(dwayne) and Promotive(dwayne) and forall x (Null(x) and Promotive(x) -> Challenge(x, dwayne)) -> therefore Challenge(dwayne, dwayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The farrah elegise the lark. The farrah topdress the silva. The farrah is senseless. The farrah lithograph the silva. The silva elegise the lark. The silva topdress the lark. The silva is elflike. The silva is luxe. The silva is deciduous. The silva lithograph the lark. The lark elegise the farrah. The lark elegise the silva. The lark is elflike. The lark is luxe. The lark lithograph the silva. If someone is deciduous and they need the farrah then they need the lark. If someone topdress the lark and they are elflike then they need the silva. If someone lithograph the farrah then the farrah is elflike. If someone elegise the silva and the silva is deciduous then the silva topdress the farrah. If someone is senseless and elflike then they eat the lark. If someone topdress the lark then the lark is senseless. If someone is quadrate then they eat the farrah. If the farrah lithograph the lark and the farrah lithograph the silva then the lark topdress the farrah. The lark does not eat the lark.", "logic": "\nElegise(farrah, lark)\nTopdress(farrah, silva)\nSenseless(farrah)\nLithograph(farrah, silva)\nElegise(silva, lark)\nTopdress(silva, lark)\nElflike(silva)\nLuxe(silva)\nDeciduous(silva)\nLithograph(silva, lark)\nElegise(lark, farrah)\nElegise(lark, silva)\nElflike(lark)\nLuxe(lark)\nLithograph(lark, silva)\nforall x (Deciduous(x) and Lithograph(x, farrah) -> Lithograph(x, lark))\nforall x (Topdress(x, lark) and Elflike(x) -> Lithograph(x, silva))\nforall x (Lithograph(x, farrah) -> Elflike(farrah))\nforall x (Elegise(x, silva) and Deciduous(silva) -> Topdress(silva, farrah))\nforall x (Senseless(x) and Elflike(x) -> Topdress(x, lark))\nforall x (Topdress(x, lark) -> Senseless(lark))\nforall x (Quadrate(x) -> Topdress(x, farrah))\nLithograph(farrah, lark) and Lithograph(farrah, silva) -> Topdress(lark, farrah)\n\nnot Topdress(lark, lark)\n\nTopdress(silva, lark) and forall x (Topdress(x, lark) -> Senseless(lark)) -> therefore Senseless(lark) Senseless(lark) and Elflike(lark) and forall x (Senseless(x) and Elflike(x) -> Topdress(x, lark)) -> therefore Topdress(lark, lark)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The magdalena hunger the hailee. The magdalena classify the adolph. The magdalena is nativistic. The magdalena disapprove the adolph. The adolph hunger the hailee. The adolph classify the hailee. The adolph is addictive. The adolph is nomothetic. The adolph is fahrenheit. The adolph disapprove the hailee. The hailee hunger the magdalena. The hailee hunger the adolph. The hailee is addictive. The hailee is nomothetic. The hailee disapprove the adolph. If someone is fahrenheit and they need the magdalena then they need the hailee. If someone classify the hailee and they are addictive then they need the adolph. If someone disapprove the magdalena then the magdalena is addictive. If someone hunger the adolph and the adolph is fahrenheit then the adolph classify the magdalena. If someone is nativistic and addictive then they eat the hailee. If someone classify the hailee then the hailee is nativistic. If someone is entozoic then they eat the magdalena. If the magdalena disapprove the hailee and the magdalena disapprove the adolph then the hailee classify the magdalena. The magdalena is not addictive.", "logic": "\nHunger(magdalena, hailee)\nClassify(magdalena, adolph)\nNativistic(magdalena)\nDisapprove(magdalena, adolph)\nHunger(adolph, hailee)\nClassify(adolph, hailee)\nAddictive(adolph)\nNomothetic(adolph)\nFahrenheit(adolph)\nDisapprove(adolph, hailee)\nHunger(hailee, magdalena)\nHunger(hailee, adolph)\nAddictive(hailee)\nNomothetic(hailee)\nDisapprove(hailee, adolph)\nforall x (Fahrenheit(x) and Disapprove(x, magdalena) -> Disapprove(x, hailee))\nforall x (Classify(x, hailee) and Addictive(x) -> Disapprove(x, adolph))\nforall x (Disapprove(x, magdalena) -> Addictive(magdalena))\nforall x (Hunger(x, adolph) and Fahrenheit(adolph) -> Classify(adolph, magdalena))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Addictive(x) -> Classify(x, hailee))\nforall x (Classify(x, hailee) -> Nativistic(hailee))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) -> Classify(x, magdalena))\nDisapprove(magdalena, hailee) and Disapprove(magdalena, adolph) -> Classify(hailee, magdalena)\n\nnot Addictive(magdalena)\n\nforall x (Disapprove(x, magdalena) -> Addictive(magdalena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The allison unhand the abelard. The allison scull the quint. The allison is abnormal. The allison unmuzzle the quint. The quint unhand the abelard. The quint scull the abelard. The quint is colorless. The quint is marvelous. The quint is plumlike. The quint unmuzzle the abelard. The abelard unhand the allison. The abelard unhand the quint. The abelard is colorless. The abelard is marvelous. The abelard unmuzzle the quint. If someone is plumlike and they need the allison then they need the abelard. If someone scull the abelard and they are colorless then they need the quint. If someone unmuzzle the allison then the allison is colorless. If someone unhand the quint and the quint is plumlike then the quint scull the allison. If someone is abnormal and colorless then they eat the abelard. If someone scull the abelard then the abelard is abnormal. If someone is lxxxi then they eat the allison. If the allison unmuzzle the abelard and the allison unmuzzle the quint then the abelard scull the allison. The allison unmuzzle the abelard.", "logic": "\nUnhand(allison, abelard)\nScull(allison, quint)\nAbnormal(allison)\nUnmuzzle(allison, quint)\nUnhand(quint, abelard)\nScull(quint, abelard)\nColorless(quint)\nMarvelous(quint)\nPlumlike(quint)\nUnmuzzle(quint, abelard)\nUnhand(abelard, allison)\nUnhand(abelard, quint)\nColorless(abelard)\nMarvelous(abelard)\nUnmuzzle(abelard, quint)\nforall x (Plumlike(x) and Unmuzzle(x, allison) -> Unmuzzle(x, abelard))\nforall x (Scull(x, abelard) and Colorless(x) -> Unmuzzle(x, quint))\nforall x (Unmuzzle(x, allison) -> Colorless(allison))\nforall x (Unhand(x, quint) and Plumlike(quint) -> Scull(quint, allison))\nforall x (Abnormal(x) and Colorless(x) -> Scull(x, abelard))\nforall x (Scull(x, abelard) -> Abnormal(abelard))\nforall x (Lxxxi(x) -> Scull(x, allison))\nUnmuzzle(allison, abelard) and Unmuzzle(allison, quint) -> Scull(abelard, allison)\n\nUnmuzzle(allison, abelard)\n\nforall x (Plumlike(x) and Unmuzzle(x, allison) -> Unmuzzle(x, abelard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The claretta sympathise the gratia. The claretta expel the armond. The claretta is polyglot. The claretta scatter the armond. The armond sympathise the gratia. The armond expel the gratia. The armond is belated. The armond is roundish. The armond is gregarious. The armond scatter the gratia. The gratia sympathise the claretta. The gratia sympathise the armond. The gratia is belated. The gratia is roundish. The gratia scatter the armond. If someone is gregarious and they need the claretta then they need the gratia. If someone expel the gratia and they are belated then they need the armond. If someone scatter the claretta then the claretta is belated. If someone sympathise the armond and the armond is gregarious then the armond expel the claretta. If someone is polyglot and belated then they eat the gratia. If someone expel the gratia then the gratia is polyglot. If someone is satanic then they eat the claretta. If the claretta scatter the gratia and the claretta scatter the armond then the gratia expel the claretta. The claretta does not eat the gratia.", "logic": "\nSympathise(claretta, gratia)\nExpel(claretta, armond)\nPolyglot(claretta)\nScatter(claretta, armond)\nSympathise(armond, gratia)\nExpel(armond, gratia)\nBelated(armond)\nRoundish(armond)\nGregarious(armond)\nScatter(armond, gratia)\nSympathise(gratia, claretta)\nSympathise(gratia, armond)\nBelated(gratia)\nRoundish(gratia)\nScatter(gratia, armond)\nforall x (Gregarious(x) and Scatter(x, claretta) -> Scatter(x, gratia))\nforall x (Expel(x, gratia) and Belated(x) -> Scatter(x, armond))\nforall x (Scatter(x, claretta) -> Belated(claretta))\nforall x (Sympathise(x, armond) and Gregarious(armond) -> Expel(armond, claretta))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) and Belated(x) -> Expel(x, gratia))\nforall x (Expel(x, gratia) -> Polyglot(gratia))\nforall x (Satanic(x) -> Expel(x, claretta))\nScatter(claretta, gratia) and Scatter(claretta, armond) -> Expel(gratia, claretta)\n\nnot Expel(claretta, gratia)\n\nforall x (Polyglot(x) and Belated(x) -> Expel(x, gratia)) <- forall x (Scatter(x, claretta) -> Belated(claretta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The mikey dismay the odell. The mikey derogate the rabi. The mikey is unmixable. The mikey meddle the rabi. The rabi dismay the odell. The rabi derogate the odell. The rabi is raisable. The rabi is austral. The rabi is sacred. The rabi meddle the odell. The odell dismay the mikey. The odell dismay the rabi. The odell is raisable. The odell is austral. The odell meddle the rabi. If someone is sacred and they need the mikey then they need the odell. If someone derogate the odell and they are raisable then they need the rabi. If someone meddle the mikey then the mikey is raisable. If someone dismay the rabi and the rabi is sacred then the rabi derogate the mikey. If someone is unmixable and raisable then they eat the odell. If someone derogate the odell then the odell is unmixable. If someone is sororal then they eat the mikey. If the mikey meddle the odell and the mikey meddle the rabi then the odell derogate the mikey. The mikey is austral.", "logic": "\nDismay(mikey, odell)\nDerogate(mikey, rabi)\nUnmixable(mikey)\nMeddle(mikey, rabi)\nDismay(rabi, odell)\nDerogate(rabi, odell)\nRaisable(rabi)\nAustral(rabi)\nSacred(rabi)\nMeddle(rabi, odell)\nDismay(odell, mikey)\nDismay(odell, rabi)\nRaisable(odell)\nAustral(odell)\nMeddle(odell, rabi)\nforall x (Sacred(x) and Meddle(x, mikey) -> Meddle(x, odell))\nforall x (Derogate(x, odell) and Raisable(x) -> Meddle(x, rabi))\nforall x (Meddle(x, mikey) -> Raisable(mikey))\nforall x (Dismay(x, rabi) and Sacred(rabi) -> Derogate(rabi, mikey))\nforall x (Unmixable(x) and Raisable(x) -> Derogate(x, odell))\nforall x (Derogate(x, odell) -> Unmixable(odell))\nforall x (Sororal(x) -> Derogate(x, mikey))\nMeddle(mikey, odell) and Meddle(mikey, rabi) -> Derogate(odell, mikey)\n\nAustral(mikey)\n\nAustral(mikey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The bertine stet the tadeas. The bertine snowboard the joceline. The bertine is strenuous. The bertine upheave the joceline. The joceline stet the tadeas. The joceline snowboard the tadeas. The joceline is maladroit. The joceline is ministrant. The joceline is cotyloidal. The joceline upheave the tadeas. The tadeas stet the bertine. The tadeas stet the joceline. The tadeas is maladroit. The tadeas is ministrant. The tadeas upheave the joceline. If someone is cotyloidal and they need the bertine then they need the tadeas. If someone snowboard the tadeas and they are maladroit then they need the joceline. If someone upheave the bertine then the bertine is maladroit. If someone stet the joceline and the joceline is cotyloidal then the joceline snowboard the bertine. If someone is strenuous and maladroit then they eat the tadeas. If someone snowboard the tadeas then the tadeas is strenuous. If someone is visualised then they eat the bertine. If the bertine upheave the tadeas and the bertine upheave the joceline then the tadeas snowboard the bertine. The tadeas does not eat the joceline.", "logic": "\nStet(bertine, tadeas)\nSnowboard(bertine, joceline)\nStrenuous(bertine)\nUpheave(bertine, joceline)\nStet(joceline, tadeas)\nSnowboard(joceline, tadeas)\nMaladroit(joceline)\nMinistrant(joceline)\nCotyloidal(joceline)\nUpheave(joceline, tadeas)\nStet(tadeas, bertine)\nStet(tadeas, joceline)\nMaladroit(tadeas)\nMinistrant(tadeas)\nUpheave(tadeas, joceline)\nforall x (Cotyloidal(x) and Upheave(x, bertine) -> Upheave(x, tadeas))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, tadeas) and Maladroit(x) -> Upheave(x, joceline))\nforall x (Upheave(x, bertine) -> Maladroit(bertine))\nforall x (Stet(x, joceline) and Cotyloidal(joceline) -> Snowboard(joceline, bertine))\nforall x (Strenuous(x) and Maladroit(x) -> Snowboard(x, tadeas))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, tadeas) -> Strenuous(tadeas))\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> Snowboard(x, bertine))\nUpheave(bertine, tadeas) and Upheave(bertine, joceline) -> Snowboard(tadeas, bertine)\n\nnot Snowboard(tadeas, joceline)\n\nnot Snowboard(tadeas, joceline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "The rosana chitchat the purcell. The rosana ensile the appolonia. The rosana is whiskered. The rosana pommel the appolonia. The appolonia chitchat the purcell. The appolonia ensile the purcell. The appolonia is adductive. The appolonia is regulative. The appolonia is dismissive. The appolonia pommel the purcell. The purcell chitchat the rosana. The purcell chitchat the appolonia. The purcell is adductive. The purcell is regulative. The purcell pommel the appolonia. If someone is dismissive and they need the rosana then they need the purcell. If someone ensile the purcell and they are adductive then they need the appolonia. If someone pommel the rosana then the rosana is adductive. If someone chitchat the appolonia and the appolonia is dismissive then the appolonia ensile the rosana. If someone is whiskered and adductive then they eat the purcell. If someone ensile the purcell then the purcell is whiskered. If someone is conveyable then they eat the rosana. If the rosana pommel the purcell and the rosana pommel the appolonia then the purcell ensile the rosana. The appolonia is conveyable.", "logic": "\nChitchat(rosana, purcell)\nEnsile(rosana, appolonia)\nWhiskered(rosana)\nPommel(rosana, appolonia)\nChitchat(appolonia, purcell)\nEnsile(appolonia, purcell)\nAdductive(appolonia)\nRegulative(appolonia)\nDismissive(appolonia)\nPommel(appolonia, purcell)\nChitchat(purcell, rosana)\nChitchat(purcell, appolonia)\nAdductive(purcell)\nRegulative(purcell)\nPommel(purcell, appolonia)\nforall x (Dismissive(x) and Pommel(x, rosana) -> Pommel(x, purcell))\nforall x (Ensile(x, purcell) and Adductive(x) -> Pommel(x, appolonia))\nforall x (Pommel(x, rosana) -> Adductive(rosana))\nforall x (Chitchat(x, appolonia) and Dismissive(appolonia) -> Ensile(appolonia, rosana))\nforall x (Whiskered(x) and Adductive(x) -> Ensile(x, purcell))\nforall x (Ensile(x, purcell) -> Whiskered(purcell))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Ensile(x, rosana))\nPommel(rosana, purcell) and Pommel(rosana, appolonia) -> Ensile(purcell, rosana)\n\nConveyable(appolonia)\n\nConveyable(appolonia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1212"} {"premises": "Lazlo is skintight. Lazlo is enforced. Lazlo is varying. Cornela is unladylike. Cornela is extropic. Cornela is skintight. Cornela is doughy. All czarist people are extropic. Smart, skintight people are czarist. Lazlo is varying.", "logic": "\nSkintight(lazlo)\nEnforced(lazlo)\nVarying(lazlo)\nUnladylike(cornela)\nExtropic(cornela)\nSkintight(cornela)\nDoughy(cornela)\nforall x (Czarist(x) -> Extropic(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) and Skintight(x) -> Czarist(x))\n\nVarying(lazlo)\n\ntherefore Varying(lazlo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Mela is direct. Mela is narcotized. Mela is saved. Adrian is coreferent. Adrian is pyrrhic. Adrian is direct. Adrian is malignant. All spirituous people are pyrrhic. Smart, direct people are spirituous. Mela is not saved.", "logic": "\nDirect(mela)\nNarcotized(mela)\nSaved(mela)\nCoreferent(adrian)\nPyrrhic(adrian)\nDirect(adrian)\nMalignant(adrian)\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nforall x (Saved(x) and Direct(x) -> Spirituous(x))\n\nnot Saved(mela)\n\ntherefore Saved(mela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Mabelle is sinusoidal. Mabelle is afoot. Mabelle is primitive. Minerva is eponymic. Minerva is prandial. Minerva is sinusoidal. Minerva is plantar. All falling people are prandial. Smart, sinusoidal people are falling. Mabelle is falling.", "logic": "\nSinusoidal(mabelle)\nAfoot(mabelle)\nPrimitive(mabelle)\nEponymic(minerva)\nPrandial(minerva)\nSinusoidal(minerva)\nPlantar(minerva)\nforall x (Falling(x) -> Prandial(x))\nforall x (Primitive(x) and Sinusoidal(x) -> Falling(x))\n\nFalling(mabelle)\n\nPrimitive(mabelle) and Sinusoidal(mabelle) and forall x (Primitive(x) and Sinusoidal(x) -> Falling(x)) -> therefore Falling(mabelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Sylvester is phonemic. Sylvester is ukrainian. Sylvester is transonic. Andrzej is foetal. Andrzej is brimfull. Andrzej is phonemic. Andrzej is pulverised. All liquescent people are brimfull. Smart, phonemic people are liquescent. Sylvester is not liquescent.", "logic": "\nPhonemic(sylvester)\nUkrainian(sylvester)\nTransonic(sylvester)\nFoetal(andrzej)\nBrimfull(andrzej)\nPhonemic(andrzej)\nPulverised(andrzej)\nforall x (Liquescent(x) -> Brimfull(x))\nforall x (Transonic(x) and Phonemic(x) -> Liquescent(x))\n\nnot Liquescent(sylvester)\n\nTransonic(sylvester) and Phonemic(sylvester) and forall x (Transonic(x) and Phonemic(x) -> Liquescent(x)) -> therefore Liquescent(sylvester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Rustie is unsealed. Rustie is lxiii. Rustie is compatible. Lorry is prospering. Lorry is proofed. Lorry is unsealed. Lorry is encrusted. All anagogic people are proofed. Smart, unsealed people are anagogic. Rustie is proofed.", "logic": "\nUnsealed(rustie)\nLxiii(rustie)\nCompatible(rustie)\nProspering(lorry)\nProofed(lorry)\nUnsealed(lorry)\nEncrusted(lorry)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Proofed(x))\nforall x (Compatible(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Anagogic(x))\n\nProofed(rustie)\n\nCompatible(rustie) and Unsealed(rustie) and forall x (Compatible(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Anagogic(x)) -> therefore Anagogic(rustie) Anagogic(rustie) and forall x (Anagogic(x) -> Proofed(x)) -> therefore Proofed(rustie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Renado is rosaceous. Renado is nocent. Renado is sloppy. Godiva is posed. Godiva is unexplored. Godiva is rosaceous. Godiva is erectile. All unplanted people are unexplored. Smart, rosaceous people are unplanted. Renado is not unexplored.", "logic": "\nRosaceous(renado)\nNocent(renado)\nSloppy(renado)\nPosed(godiva)\nUnexplored(godiva)\nRosaceous(godiva)\nErectile(godiva)\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Sloppy(x) and Rosaceous(x) -> Unplanted(x))\n\nnot Unexplored(renado)\n\nSloppy(renado) and Rosaceous(renado) and forall x (Sloppy(x) and Rosaceous(x) -> Unplanted(x)) -> therefore Unplanted(renado) Unplanted(renado) and forall x (Unplanted(x) -> Unexplored(x)) -> therefore Unexplored(renado)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Jamima is discovered. Jamima is downstairs. Jamima is coagulable. Tomi is medullary. Tomi is tonguelike. Tomi is discovered. Tomi is germanic. All tsarist people are tonguelike. Smart, discovered people are tsarist. Tomi is not tsarist.", "logic": "\nDiscovered(jamima)\nDownstairs(jamima)\nCoagulable(jamima)\nMedullary(tomi)\nTonguelike(tomi)\nDiscovered(tomi)\nGermanic(tomi)\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Discovered(x) -> Tsarist(x))\n\nnot Tsarist(tomi)\n\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Discovered(x) -> Tsarist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Debra is forlorn. Debra is unlighted. Debra is stifling. Cecile is acuminate. Cecile is laden. Cecile is forlorn. Cecile is genealogic. All shortened people are laden. Smart, forlorn people are shortened. Cecile is unlighted.", "logic": "\nForlorn(debra)\nUnlighted(debra)\nStifling(debra)\nAcuminate(cecile)\nLaden(cecile)\nForlorn(cecile)\nGenealogic(cecile)\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Stifling(x) and Forlorn(x) -> Shortened(x))\n\nUnlighted(cecile)\n\nUnlighted(cecile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Willey is unhelpful. Willey is paintable. Willey is unaffixed. Miran is shackled. Miran is archeozoic. Miran is unhelpful. Miran is brimming. All uncovered people are archeozoic. Smart, unhelpful people are uncovered. Willey is not shackled.", "logic": "\nUnhelpful(willey)\nPaintable(willey)\nUnaffixed(willey)\nShackled(miran)\nArcheozoic(miran)\nUnhelpful(miran)\nBrimming(miran)\nforall x (Uncovered(x) -> Archeozoic(x))\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) and Unhelpful(x) -> Uncovered(x))\n\nnot Shackled(willey)\n\nnot Shackled(willey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Gwenn is hybrid. Gwenn is esoteric. Gwenn is diarrhetic. Rudolfo is confident. Rudolfo is gelded. Rudolfo is hybrid. Rudolfo is lovely. All bored people are gelded. Smart, hybrid people are bored. Gwenn is lovely.", "logic": "\nHybrid(gwenn)\nEsoteric(gwenn)\nDiarrhetic(gwenn)\nConfident(rudolfo)\nGelded(rudolfo)\nHybrid(rudolfo)\nLovely(rudolfo)\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Gelded(x))\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) and Hybrid(x) -> Bored(x))\n\nLovely(gwenn)\n\nLovely(gwenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1115"} {"premises": "Cherilyn is maniac. Furry people are rostrate. All maniac people are unaged. If someone is unaged then they are ideational. Cherilyn is maniac.", "logic": "\nManiac(cherilyn)\nforall x (Unaged(x) -> Rostrate(x))\nforall x (Maniac(x) -> Unaged(x))\nforall x (Unaged(x) -> Ideational(x))\n\nManiac(cherilyn)\n\ntherefore Maniac(cherilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Wojciech is unfinished. Furry people are bilingual. All unfinished people are numberless. If someone is numberless then they are emasculate. Wojciech is not unfinished.", "logic": "\nUnfinished(wojciech)\nforall x (Numberless(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nforall x (Unfinished(x) -> Numberless(x))\nforall x (Numberless(x) -> Emasculate(x))\n\nnot Unfinished(wojciech)\n\ntherefore Unfinished(wojciech)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Peri is bottommost. Furry people are connected. All bottommost people are exuvial. If someone is exuvial then they are trabeate. Peri is exuvial.", "logic": "\nBottommost(peri)\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Connected(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Exuvial(x))\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Trabeate(x))\n\nExuvial(peri)\n\nBottommost(peri) and forall x (Bottommost(x) -> Exuvial(x)) -> therefore Exuvial(peri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Zaneta is undulant. Furry people are downwind. All undulant people are iambic. If someone is iambic then they are australian. Zaneta is not iambic.", "logic": "\nUndulant(zaneta)\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Downwind(x))\nforall x (Undulant(x) -> Iambic(x))\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Australian(x))\n\nnot Iambic(zaneta)\n\nUndulant(zaneta) and forall x (Undulant(x) -> Iambic(x)) -> therefore Iambic(zaneta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Dawson is paired. Furry people are medium. All paired people are amateur. If someone is amateur then they are unified. Dawson is medium.", "logic": "\nPaired(dawson)\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Unified(x))\n\nMedium(dawson)\n\nPaired(dawson) and forall x (Paired(x) -> Amateur(x)) -> therefore Amateur(dawson) Amateur(dawson) and forall x (Amateur(x) -> Medium(x)) -> therefore Medium(dawson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Liora is bouncy. Furry people are continuant. All bouncy people are guttural. If someone is guttural then they are trapped. Liora is not trapped.", "logic": "\nBouncy(liora)\nforall x (Guttural(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Bouncy(x) -> Guttural(x))\nforall x (Guttural(x) -> Trapped(x))\n\nnot Trapped(liora)\n\nBouncy(liora) and forall x (Bouncy(x) -> Guttural(x)) -> therefore Guttural(liora) Guttural(liora) and forall x (Guttural(x) -> Trapped(x)) -> therefore Trapped(liora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Grace is layered. Furry people are monopteral. All layered people are rank. If someone is rank then they are unabused. Grace is not big.", "logic": "\nLayered(grace)\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Monopteral(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Unabused(x))\n\nnot Big(grace)\n\nnot Big(grace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Molli is crescent. Furry people are umteenth. All crescent people are nonstick. If someone is nonstick then they are aphasic. Molli is young.", "logic": "\nCrescent(molli)\nforall x (Nonstick(x) -> Umteenth(x))\nforall x (Crescent(x) -> Nonstick(x))\nforall x (Nonstick(x) -> Aphasic(x))\n\nYoung(molli)\n\nYoung(molli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Lyle is despotic. Farra is not clinquant. Farra is not beheaded. Ranee is beheaded. Ranee is boracic. Harli is untenanted. Harli is foster. If Farra is not despotic then Farra is beheaded. All oligarchic people are clinquant. If someone is beheaded and not despotic then they are clinquant. If Farra is oligarchic then Farra is not boracic. Cold, beheaded people are untenanted. Round people are oligarchic. Harli is untenanted.", "logic": "\nDespotic(lyle)\nnot Clinquant(farra)\nnot Beheaded(farra)\nBeheaded(ranee)\nBoracic(ranee)\nUntenanted(harli)\nFoster(harli)\nnot Despotic(farra) -> Beheaded(farra)\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Clinquant(x))\nforall x (Beheaded(x) and not Despotic(x) -> Clinquant(x))\nOligarchic(farra) -> not Boracic(farra)\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) and Beheaded(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Beheaded(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\n\nUntenanted(harli)\n\ntherefore Untenanted(harli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Sashenka is altissimo. Avrom is not defunct. Avrom is not queer. Ladonna is queer. Ladonna is soundless. Dew is belittled. Dew is undatable. If Avrom is not altissimo then Avrom is queer. All gracious people are defunct. If someone is queer and not altissimo then they are defunct. If Avrom is gracious then Avrom is not soundless. Cold, queer people are belittled. Round people are gracious. Avrom is defunct.", "logic": "\nAltissimo(sashenka)\nnot Defunct(avrom)\nnot Queer(avrom)\nQueer(ladonna)\nSoundless(ladonna)\nBelittled(dew)\nUndatable(dew)\nnot Altissimo(avrom) -> Queer(avrom)\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Queer(x) and not Altissimo(x) -> Defunct(x))\nGracious(avrom) -> not Soundless(avrom)\nforall x (Gracious(x) and Queer(x) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Queer(x) -> Gracious(x))\n\nDefunct(avrom)\n\ntherefore not Defunct(avrom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Fabrianne is unportable. Devi is not seamed. Devi is not tight. Dierdre is tight. Dierdre is symbolic. Aeriela is aciduric. Aeriela is eightieth. If Devi is not unportable then Devi is tight. All unedifying people are seamed. If someone is tight and not unportable then they are seamed. If Devi is unedifying then Devi is not symbolic. Cold, tight people are aciduric. Round people are unedifying. Dierdre is unedifying.", "logic": "\nUnportable(fabrianne)\nnot Seamed(devi)\nnot Tight(devi)\nTight(dierdre)\nSymbolic(dierdre)\nAciduric(aeriela)\nEightieth(aeriela)\nnot Unportable(devi) -> Tight(devi)\nforall x (Unedifying(x) -> Seamed(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and not Unportable(x) -> Seamed(x))\nUnedifying(devi) -> not Symbolic(devi)\nforall x (Unedifying(x) and Tight(x) -> Aciduric(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Unedifying(x))\n\nUnedifying(dierdre)\n\nTight(dierdre) and forall x (Tight(x) -> Unedifying(x)) -> therefore Unedifying(dierdre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Junette is collagenic. Ferne is not zoophagous. Ferne is not erose. Rollins is erose. Rollins is knotty. Zed is mass. Zed is attached. If Ferne is not collagenic then Ferne is erose. All pyknotic people are zoophagous. If someone is erose and not collagenic then they are zoophagous. If Ferne is pyknotic then Ferne is not knotty. Cold, erose people are mass. Round people are pyknotic. Rollins is not pyknotic.", "logic": "\nCollagenic(junette)\nnot Zoophagous(ferne)\nnot Erose(ferne)\nErose(rollins)\nKnotty(rollins)\nMass(zed)\nAttached(zed)\nnot Collagenic(ferne) -> Erose(ferne)\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) and not Collagenic(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\nPyknotic(ferne) -> not Knotty(ferne)\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) and Erose(x) -> Mass(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) -> Pyknotic(x))\n\nnot Pyknotic(rollins)\n\nErose(rollins) and forall x (Erose(x) -> Pyknotic(x)) -> therefore Pyknotic(rollins)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Harland is dominant. Britani is not mendicant. Britani is not potholed. Pierson is potholed. Pierson is upland. Armstrong is unburied. Armstrong is monkish. If Britani is not dominant then Britani is potholed. All jejune people are mendicant. If someone is potholed and not dominant then they are mendicant. If Britani is jejune then Britani is not upland. Cold, potholed people are unburied. Round people are jejune. Pierson is mendicant.", "logic": "\nDominant(harland)\nnot Mendicant(britani)\nnot Potholed(britani)\nPotholed(pierson)\nUpland(pierson)\nUnburied(armstrong)\nMonkish(armstrong)\nnot Dominant(britani) -> Potholed(britani)\nforall x (Jejune(x) -> Mendicant(x))\nforall x (Potholed(x) and not Dominant(x) -> Mendicant(x))\nJejune(britani) -> not Upland(britani)\nforall x (Jejune(x) and Potholed(x) -> Unburied(x))\nforall x (Potholed(x) -> Jejune(x))\n\nMendicant(pierson)\n\nPotholed(pierson) and forall x (Potholed(x) -> Jejune(x)) -> therefore Jejune(pierson) Jejune(pierson) and forall x (Jejune(x) -> Mendicant(x)) -> therefore Mendicant(pierson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Kora is coriaceous. Dixie is not populated. Dixie is not verdant. Shawna is verdant. Shawna is bibliotic. Sapphira is transpolar. Sapphira is iberian. If Dixie is not coriaceous then Dixie is verdant. All troublous people are populated. If someone is verdant and not coriaceous then they are populated. If Dixie is troublous then Dixie is not bibliotic. Cold, verdant people are transpolar. Round people are troublous. Shawna is not transpolar.", "logic": "\nCoriaceous(kora)\nnot Populated(dixie)\nnot Verdant(dixie)\nVerdant(shawna)\nBibliotic(shawna)\nTranspolar(sapphira)\nIberian(sapphira)\nnot Coriaceous(dixie) -> Verdant(dixie)\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> Populated(x))\nforall x (Verdant(x) and not Coriaceous(x) -> Populated(x))\nTroublous(dixie) -> not Bibliotic(dixie)\nforall x (Troublous(x) and Verdant(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Verdant(x) -> Troublous(x))\n\nnot Transpolar(shawna)\n\nVerdant(shawna) and forall x (Verdant(x) -> Troublous(x)) -> therefore Troublous(shawna) Troublous(shawna) and Verdant(shawna) and forall x (Troublous(x) and Verdant(x) -> Transpolar(x)) -> therefore Transpolar(shawna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Eugenia is confiding. Worth is not dissident. Worth is not grainy. Ariela is grainy. Ariela is eager. Paula is outlying. Paula is gestural. If Worth is not confiding then Worth is grainy. All prospering people are dissident. If someone is grainy and not confiding then they are dissident. If Worth is prospering then Worth is not eager. Cold, grainy people are outlying. Round people are prospering. Paula is not dissident.", "logic": "\nConfiding(eugenia)\nnot Dissident(worth)\nnot Grainy(worth)\nGrainy(ariela)\nEager(ariela)\nOutlying(paula)\nGestural(paula)\nnot Confiding(worth) -> Grainy(worth)\nforall x (Prospering(x) -> Dissident(x))\nforall x (Grainy(x) and not Confiding(x) -> Dissident(x))\nProspering(worth) -> not Eager(worth)\nforall x (Prospering(x) and Grainy(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Grainy(x) -> Prospering(x))\n\nnot Dissident(paula)\n\nforall x (Prospering(x) -> Dissident(x)) <- forall x (Grainy(x) -> Prospering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Leo is saintly. Quillan is not acquainted. Quillan is not clean. Ingmar is clean. Ingmar is quadruplex. Archibald is jugular. Archibald is preceding. If Quillan is not saintly then Quillan is clean. All misleading people are acquainted. If someone is clean and not saintly then they are acquainted. If Quillan is misleading then Quillan is not quadruplex. Cold, clean people are jugular. Round people are misleading. Leo is jugular.", "logic": "\nSaintly(leo)\nnot Acquainted(quillan)\nnot Clean(quillan)\nClean(ingmar)\nQuadruplex(ingmar)\nJugular(archibald)\nPreceding(archibald)\nnot Saintly(quillan) -> Clean(quillan)\nforall x (Misleading(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Clean(x) and not Saintly(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nMisleading(quillan) -> not Quadruplex(quillan)\nforall x (Misleading(x) and Clean(x) -> Jugular(x))\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Misleading(x))\n\nJugular(leo)\n\nforall x (Misleading(x) and Clean(x) -> Jugular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Dorisa is scorching. Francois is not shifty. Francois is not bottommost. Gabbi is bottommost. Gabbi is contrite. Truman is pemphigous. Truman is desolate. If Francois is not scorching then Francois is bottommost. All star people are shifty. If someone is bottommost and not scorching then they are shifty. If Francois is star then Francois is not contrite. Cold, bottommost people are pemphigous. Round people are star. Francois is not pemphigous.", "logic": "\nScorching(dorisa)\nnot Shifty(francois)\nnot Bottommost(francois)\nBottommost(gabbi)\nContrite(gabbi)\nPemphigous(truman)\nDesolate(truman)\nnot Scorching(francois) -> Bottommost(francois)\nforall x (Star(x) -> Shifty(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) and not Scorching(x) -> Shifty(x))\nStar(francois) -> not Contrite(francois)\nforall x (Star(x) and Bottommost(x) -> Pemphigous(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Star(x))\n\nnot Pemphigous(francois)\n\nforall x (Star(x) and Bottommost(x) -> Pemphigous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Thorstein is cringing. Gilberta is not ablaze. Gilberta is not manichaean. Ferdinand is manichaean. Ferdinand is orienting. Fonsie is negligible. Fonsie is littered. If Gilberta is not cringing then Gilberta is manichaean. All disturbed people are ablaze. If someone is manichaean and not cringing then they are ablaze. If Gilberta is disturbed then Gilberta is not orienting. Cold, manichaean people are negligible. Round people are disturbed. Fonsie is manichaean.", "logic": "\nCringing(thorstein)\nnot Ablaze(gilberta)\nnot Manichaean(gilberta)\nManichaean(ferdinand)\nOrienting(ferdinand)\nNegligible(fonsie)\nLittered(fonsie)\nnot Cringing(gilberta) -> Manichaean(gilberta)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Ablaze(x))\nforall x (Manichaean(x) and not Cringing(x) -> Ablaze(x))\nDisturbed(gilberta) -> not Orienting(gilberta)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) and Manichaean(x) -> Negligible(x))\nforall x (Manichaean(x) -> Disturbed(x))\n\nManichaean(fonsie)\n\nManichaean(fonsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Wilmer is leaky. Rosa is not spry. Rosa is not cosmogonic. Marys is cosmogonic. Marys is venomed. Charles is ostensible. Charles is crapulous. If Rosa is not leaky then Rosa is cosmogonic. All oxidizable people are spry. If someone is cosmogonic and not leaky then they are spry. If Rosa is oxidizable then Rosa is not venomed. Cold, cosmogonic people are ostensible. Round people are oxidizable. Rosa is not venomed.", "logic": "\nLeaky(wilmer)\nnot Spry(rosa)\nnot Cosmogonic(rosa)\nCosmogonic(marys)\nVenomed(marys)\nOstensible(charles)\nCrapulous(charles)\nnot Leaky(rosa) -> Cosmogonic(rosa)\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) -> Spry(x))\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) and not Leaky(x) -> Spry(x))\nOxidizable(rosa) -> not Venomed(rosa)\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Oxidizable(x))\n\nnot Venomed(rosa)\n\nnot Venomed(rosa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Hyatt is torulose. Ezra is not scopal. Ezra is not ursine. Gwynne is ursine. Gwynne is cometic. Malcah is abducting. Malcah is lettered. If Ezra is not torulose then Ezra is ursine. All globose people are scopal. If someone is ursine and not torulose then they are scopal. If Ezra is globose then Ezra is not cometic. Cold, ursine people are abducting. Round people are globose. Malcah is torulose.", "logic": "\nTorulose(hyatt)\nnot Scopal(ezra)\nnot Ursine(ezra)\nUrsine(gwynne)\nCometic(gwynne)\nAbducting(malcah)\nLettered(malcah)\nnot Torulose(ezra) -> Ursine(ezra)\nforall x (Globose(x) -> Scopal(x))\nforall x (Ursine(x) and not Torulose(x) -> Scopal(x))\nGlobose(ezra) -> not Cometic(ezra)\nforall x (Globose(x) and Ursine(x) -> Abducting(x))\nforall x (Ursine(x) -> Globose(x))\n\nTorulose(malcah)\n\nTorulose(malcah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1124"} {"premises": "Calli is planted. Corette is planted. Douggie is not surrounded. All surrounded people are enormous. If someone is planted and placatory then they are enormous. If Calli is planted then Calli is surrounded. Corette is planted.", "logic": "\nPlanted(calli)\nPlanted(corette)\nnot Surrounded(douggie)\nforall x (Surrounded(x) -> Enormous(x))\nforall x (Planted(x) and Placatory(x) -> Enormous(x))\nPlanted(calli) -> Surrounded(calli)\n\nPlanted(corette)\n\ntherefore Planted(corette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Michail is eremitical. Nixie is eremitical. Daniella is not broody. All broody people are wanted. If someone is eremitical and respective then they are wanted. If Michail is eremitical then Michail is broody. Daniella is broody.", "logic": "\nEremitical(michail)\nEremitical(nixie)\nnot Broody(daniella)\nforall x (Broody(x) -> Wanted(x))\nforall x (Eremitical(x) and Respective(x) -> Wanted(x))\nEremitical(michail) -> Broody(michail)\n\nBroody(daniella)\n\ntherefore not Broody(daniella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Teresita is laden. Netty is laden. Elwood is not eurafrican. All eurafrican people are calico. If someone is laden and spirant then they are calico. If Teresita is laden then Teresita is eurafrican. Teresita is eurafrican.", "logic": "\nLaden(teresita)\nLaden(netty)\nnot Eurafrican(elwood)\nforall x (Eurafrican(x) -> Calico(x))\nforall x (Laden(x) and Spirant(x) -> Calico(x))\nLaden(teresita) -> Eurafrican(teresita)\n\nEurafrican(teresita)\n\nLaden(teresita) and Laden(teresita) -> Eurafrican(teresita) -> therefore Eurafrican(teresita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Selestina is expandable. Fredrika is expandable. Lonee is not malayan. All malayan people are duodecimal. If someone is expandable and songful then they are duodecimal. If Selestina is expandable then Selestina is malayan. Selestina is not malayan.", "logic": "\nExpandable(selestina)\nExpandable(fredrika)\nnot Malayan(lonee)\nforall x (Malayan(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\nforall x (Expandable(x) and Songful(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\nExpandable(selestina) -> Malayan(selestina)\n\nnot Malayan(selestina)\n\nExpandable(selestina) and Expandable(selestina) -> Malayan(selestina) -> therefore Malayan(selestina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Vivien is identical. Salmon is identical. Herman is not jaggy. All jaggy people are plantal. If someone is identical and spastic then they are plantal. If Vivien is identical then Vivien is jaggy. Vivien is plantal.", "logic": "\nIdentical(vivien)\nIdentical(salmon)\nnot Jaggy(herman)\nforall x (Jaggy(x) -> Plantal(x))\nforall x (Identical(x) and Spastic(x) -> Plantal(x))\nIdentical(vivien) -> Jaggy(vivien)\n\nPlantal(vivien)\n\nIdentical(vivien) and Identical(vivien) -> Jaggy(vivien) -> therefore Jaggy(vivien) Jaggy(vivien) and forall x (Jaggy(x) -> Plantal(x)) -> therefore Plantal(vivien)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Ishmael is appositive. Dennis is appositive. Udale is not versed. All versed people are placoid. If someone is appositive and windless then they are placoid. If Ishmael is appositive then Ishmael is versed. Ishmael is not placoid.", "logic": "\nAppositive(ishmael)\nAppositive(dennis)\nnot Versed(udale)\nforall x (Versed(x) -> Placoid(x))\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Windless(x) -> Placoid(x))\nAppositive(ishmael) -> Versed(ishmael)\n\nnot Placoid(ishmael)\n\nAppositive(ishmael) and Appositive(ishmael) -> Versed(ishmael) -> therefore Versed(ishmael) Versed(ishmael) and forall x (Versed(x) -> Placoid(x)) -> therefore Placoid(ishmael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Amanda is wordy. Sheelagh is wordy. Zacharias is not subgross. All subgross people are aleutian. If someone is wordy and sevenfold then they are aleutian. If Amanda is wordy then Amanda is subgross. Sheelagh is not aleutian.", "logic": "\nWordy(amanda)\nWordy(sheelagh)\nnot Subgross(zacharias)\nforall x (Subgross(x) -> Aleutian(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) and Sevenfold(x) -> Aleutian(x))\nWordy(amanda) -> Subgross(amanda)\n\nnot Aleutian(sheelagh)\n\nforall x (Subgross(x) -> Aleutian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Darren is prodigal. Zared is prodigal. Baily is not xlii. All xlii people are vernal. If someone is prodigal and befogged then they are vernal. If Darren is prodigal then Darren is xlii. Baily is vernal.", "logic": "\nProdigal(darren)\nProdigal(zared)\nnot Xlii(baily)\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Vernal(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) and Befogged(x) -> Vernal(x))\nProdigal(darren) -> Xlii(darren)\n\nVernal(baily)\n\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Vernal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Kalindi is frangible. Nena is frangible. Colene is not mammalian. All mammalian people are nascent. If someone is frangible and xxxi then they are nascent. If Kalindi is frangible then Kalindi is mammalian. Colene is not frangible.", "logic": "\nFrangible(kalindi)\nFrangible(nena)\nnot Mammalian(colene)\nforall x (Mammalian(x) -> Nascent(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Nascent(x))\nFrangible(kalindi) -> Mammalian(kalindi)\n\nnot Frangible(colene)\n\nnot Frangible(colene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Quentin is eristical. Dove is eristical. Lamb is not catchy. All catchy people are cephalic. If someone is eristical and brackish then they are cephalic. If Quentin is eristical then Quentin is catchy. Lamb is nice.", "logic": "\nEristical(quentin)\nEristical(dove)\nnot Catchy(lamb)\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Eristical(x) and Brackish(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nEristical(quentin) -> Catchy(quentin)\n\nNice(lamb)\n\nNice(lamb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Benjamen is ebionite. Ivor is ebionite. Jolie is not quaggy. All quaggy people are bathetic. If someone is ebionite and astatic then they are bathetic. If Benjamen is ebionite then Benjamen is quaggy. Ivor is not astatic.", "logic": "\nEbionite(benjamen)\nEbionite(ivor)\nnot Quaggy(jolie)\nforall x (Quaggy(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Ebionite(x) and Astatic(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nEbionite(benjamen) -> Quaggy(benjamen)\n\nnot Astatic(ivor)\n\nnot Astatic(ivor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Wilfred is celtic. Teodoro is celtic. Dwight is not amidship. All amidship people are nitric. If someone is celtic and demode then they are nitric. If Wilfred is celtic then Wilfred is amidship. Dwight is kind.", "logic": "\nCeltic(wilfred)\nCeltic(teodoro)\nnot Amidship(dwight)\nforall x (Amidship(x) -> Nitric(x))\nforall x (Celtic(x) and Demode(x) -> Nitric(x))\nCeltic(wilfred) -> Amidship(wilfred)\n\nKind(dwight)\n\nKind(dwight) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1420"} {"premises": "Stanton is together. Stanton is blithe. Stanton is naive. Stanton is rainy. Bathsheba is hardbound. Gerri is unruly. Anallese is blithe. All unruly, blithe people are hardbound. If Anallese is explicable then Anallese is unruly. All hardbound people are explicable. If Gerri is explicable then Gerri is together. Quiet, hardbound people are blithe. Round people are together. All together people are unruly. All rainy, unruly people are together. Stanton is naive.", "logic": "\nTogether(stanton)\nBlithe(stanton)\nNaive(stanton)\nRainy(stanton)\nHardbound(bathsheba)\nUnruly(gerri)\nBlithe(anallese)\nforall x (Unruly(x) and Blithe(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nExplicable(anallese) -> Unruly(anallese)\nforall x (Hardbound(x) -> Explicable(x))\nExplicable(gerri) -> Together(gerri)\nforall x (Unruly(x) and Hardbound(x) -> Blithe(x))\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Together(x))\nforall x (Together(x) -> Unruly(x))\nforall x (Rainy(x) and Unruly(x) -> Together(x))\n\nNaive(stanton)\n\ntherefore Naive(stanton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Annette is light. Annette is orienting. Annette is brickle. Annette is riemannian. Hercule is lunatic. Idalina is cupulate. Jule is orienting. All cupulate, orienting people are lunatic. If Jule is grateful then Jule is cupulate. All lunatic people are grateful. If Idalina is grateful then Idalina is light. Quiet, lunatic people are orienting. Round people are light. All light people are cupulate. All riemannian, cupulate people are light. Idalina is not cupulate.", "logic": "\nLight(annette)\nOrienting(annette)\nBrickle(annette)\nRiemannian(annette)\nLunatic(hercule)\nCupulate(idalina)\nOrienting(jule)\nforall x (Cupulate(x) and Orienting(x) -> Lunatic(x))\nGrateful(jule) -> Cupulate(jule)\nforall x (Lunatic(x) -> Grateful(x))\nGrateful(idalina) -> Light(idalina)\nforall x (Cupulate(x) and Lunatic(x) -> Orienting(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Cupulate(x))\nforall x (Riemannian(x) and Cupulate(x) -> Light(x))\n\nnot Cupulate(idalina)\n\ntherefore Cupulate(idalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Dimitri is iodinated. Dimitri is throwaway. Dimitri is stellar. Dimitri is wroth. Irena is posh. Clarice is quasi. Madalyn is throwaway. All quasi, throwaway people are posh. If Madalyn is alphameric then Madalyn is quasi. All posh people are alphameric. If Clarice is alphameric then Clarice is iodinated. Quiet, posh people are throwaway. Round people are iodinated. All iodinated people are quasi. All wroth, quasi people are iodinated. Dimitri is quasi.", "logic": "\nIodinated(dimitri)\nThrowaway(dimitri)\nStellar(dimitri)\nWroth(dimitri)\nPosh(irena)\nQuasi(clarice)\nThrowaway(madalyn)\nforall x (Quasi(x) and Throwaway(x) -> Posh(x))\nAlphameric(madalyn) -> Quasi(madalyn)\nforall x (Posh(x) -> Alphameric(x))\nAlphameric(clarice) -> Iodinated(clarice)\nforall x (Quasi(x) and Posh(x) -> Throwaway(x))\nforall x (Stellar(x) -> Iodinated(x))\nforall x (Iodinated(x) -> Quasi(x))\nforall x (Wroth(x) and Quasi(x) -> Iodinated(x))\n\nQuasi(dimitri)\n\nIodinated(dimitri) and forall x (Iodinated(x) -> Quasi(x)) -> therefore Quasi(dimitri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Alysa is unwritten. Alysa is rabbinic. Alysa is pervasive. Alysa is sickish. Diannne is unobliging. Whitaker is nurturant. Nerty is rabbinic. All nurturant, rabbinic people are unobliging. If Nerty is caesarian then Nerty is nurturant. All unobliging people are caesarian. If Whitaker is caesarian then Whitaker is unwritten. Quiet, unobliging people are rabbinic. Round people are unwritten. All unwritten people are nurturant. All sickish, nurturant people are unwritten. Diannne is not caesarian.", "logic": "\nUnwritten(alysa)\nRabbinic(alysa)\nPervasive(alysa)\nSickish(alysa)\nUnobliging(diannne)\nNurturant(whitaker)\nRabbinic(nerty)\nforall x (Nurturant(x) and Rabbinic(x) -> Unobliging(x))\nCaesarian(nerty) -> Nurturant(nerty)\nforall x (Unobliging(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nCaesarian(whitaker) -> Unwritten(whitaker)\nforall x (Nurturant(x) and Unobliging(x) -> Rabbinic(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Unwritten(x) -> Nurturant(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) and Nurturant(x) -> Unwritten(x))\n\nnot Caesarian(diannne)\n\nUnobliging(diannne) and forall x (Unobliging(x) -> Caesarian(x)) -> therefore Caesarian(diannne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Gilberta is molar. Gilberta is collegial. Gilberta is existent. Gilberta is funny. Hank is anurous. Nola is diaphyseal. Web is collegial. All diaphyseal, collegial people are anurous. If Web is plumping then Web is diaphyseal. All anurous people are plumping. If Nola is plumping then Nola is molar. Quiet, anurous people are collegial. Round people are molar. All molar people are diaphyseal. All funny, diaphyseal people are molar. Gilberta is anurous.", "logic": "\nMolar(gilberta)\nCollegial(gilberta)\nExistent(gilberta)\nFunny(gilberta)\nAnurous(hank)\nDiaphyseal(nola)\nCollegial(web)\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) and Collegial(x) -> Anurous(x))\nPlumping(web) -> Diaphyseal(web)\nforall x (Anurous(x) -> Plumping(x))\nPlumping(nola) -> Molar(nola)\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) and Anurous(x) -> Collegial(x))\nforall x (Existent(x) -> Molar(x))\nforall x (Molar(x) -> Diaphyseal(x))\nforall x (Funny(x) and Diaphyseal(x) -> Molar(x))\n\nAnurous(gilberta)\n\nMolar(gilberta) and forall x (Molar(x) -> Diaphyseal(x)) -> therefore Diaphyseal(gilberta) Diaphyseal(gilberta) and Collegial(gilberta) and forall x (Diaphyseal(x) and Collegial(x) -> Anurous(x)) -> therefore Anurous(gilberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Kristyn is priceless. Kristyn is viricidal. Kristyn is ageing. Kristyn is suave. Kalvin is roiling. Jervis is naval. Jerrilee is viricidal. All naval, viricidal people are roiling. If Jerrilee is unsolvable then Jerrilee is naval. All roiling people are unsolvable. If Jervis is unsolvable then Jervis is priceless. Quiet, roiling people are viricidal. Round people are priceless. All priceless people are naval. All suave, naval people are priceless. Kristyn is not roiling.", "logic": "\nPriceless(kristyn)\nViricidal(kristyn)\nAgeing(kristyn)\nSuave(kristyn)\nRoiling(kalvin)\nNaval(jervis)\nViricidal(jerrilee)\nforall x (Naval(x) and Viricidal(x) -> Roiling(x))\nUnsolvable(jerrilee) -> Naval(jerrilee)\nforall x (Roiling(x) -> Unsolvable(x))\nUnsolvable(jervis) -> Priceless(jervis)\nforall x (Naval(x) and Roiling(x) -> Viricidal(x))\nforall x (Ageing(x) -> Priceless(x))\nforall x (Priceless(x) -> Naval(x))\nforall x (Suave(x) and Naval(x) -> Priceless(x))\n\nnot Roiling(kristyn)\n\nPriceless(kristyn) and forall x (Priceless(x) -> Naval(x)) -> therefore Naval(kristyn) Naval(kristyn) and Viricidal(kristyn) and forall x (Naval(x) and Viricidal(x) -> Roiling(x)) -> therefore Roiling(kristyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Russel is wounding. Russel is subacid. Russel is neurotic. Russel is mozambican. Katharina is vicarial. Stern is plumbous. Lark is subacid. All plumbous, subacid people are vicarial. If Lark is podlike then Lark is plumbous. All vicarial people are podlike. If Stern is podlike then Stern is wounding. Quiet, vicarial people are subacid. Round people are wounding. All wounding people are plumbous. All mozambican, plumbous people are wounding. Lark is not wounding.", "logic": "\nWounding(russel)\nSubacid(russel)\nNeurotic(russel)\nMozambican(russel)\nVicarial(katharina)\nPlumbous(stern)\nSubacid(lark)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Subacid(x) -> Vicarial(x))\nPodlike(lark) -> Plumbous(lark)\nforall x (Vicarial(x) -> Podlike(x))\nPodlike(stern) -> Wounding(stern)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Vicarial(x) -> Subacid(x))\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Wounding(x))\nforall x (Wounding(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) and Plumbous(x) -> Wounding(x))\n\nnot Wounding(lark)\n\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Wounding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Royce is neuronic. Royce is volant. Royce is bratty. Royce is golden. Mora is rhythmical. Timothy is grouchy. Noelyn is volant. All grouchy, volant people are rhythmical. If Noelyn is flocculent then Noelyn is grouchy. All rhythmical people are flocculent. If Timothy is flocculent then Timothy is neuronic. Quiet, rhythmical people are volant. Round people are neuronic. All neuronic people are grouchy. All golden, grouchy people are neuronic. Mora is volant.", "logic": "\nNeuronic(royce)\nVolant(royce)\nBratty(royce)\nGolden(royce)\nRhythmical(mora)\nGrouchy(timothy)\nVolant(noelyn)\nforall x (Grouchy(x) and Volant(x) -> Rhythmical(x))\nFlocculent(noelyn) -> Grouchy(noelyn)\nforall x (Rhythmical(x) -> Flocculent(x))\nFlocculent(timothy) -> Neuronic(timothy)\nforall x (Grouchy(x) and Rhythmical(x) -> Volant(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Golden(x) and Grouchy(x) -> Neuronic(x))\n\nVolant(mora)\n\nforall x (Grouchy(x) and Rhythmical(x) -> Volant(x)) <- forall x (Neuronic(x) -> Grouchy(x)) <- forall x (Bratty(x) -> Neuronic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Jennee is botonnee. Jennee is fooling. Jennee is wolflike. Jennee is saturated. Karina is precedent. Kristel is weatherly. Caril is fooling. All weatherly, fooling people are precedent. If Caril is underived then Caril is weatherly. All precedent people are underived. If Kristel is underived then Kristel is botonnee. Quiet, precedent people are fooling. Round people are botonnee. All botonnee people are weatherly. All saturated, weatherly people are botonnee. Kristel is not fooling.", "logic": "\nBotonnee(jennee)\nFooling(jennee)\nWolflike(jennee)\nSaturated(jennee)\nPrecedent(karina)\nWeatherly(kristel)\nFooling(caril)\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Fooling(x) -> Precedent(x))\nUnderived(caril) -> Weatherly(caril)\nforall x (Precedent(x) -> Underived(x))\nUnderived(kristel) -> Botonnee(kristel)\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Precedent(x) -> Fooling(x))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) -> Botonnee(x))\nforall x (Botonnee(x) -> Weatherly(x))\nforall x (Saturated(x) and Weatherly(x) -> Botonnee(x))\n\nnot Fooling(kristel)\n\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Precedent(x) -> Fooling(x)) <- forall x (Weatherly(x) and Fooling(x) -> Precedent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Bianca is merged. Bianca is rapt. Bianca is starless. Bianca is gangling. Polly is mendicant. Eugene is divided. Mufinella is rapt. All divided, rapt people are mendicant. If Mufinella is thorough then Mufinella is divided. All mendicant people are thorough. If Eugene is thorough then Eugene is merged. Quiet, mendicant people are rapt. Round people are merged. All merged people are divided. All gangling, divided people are merged. Mufinella is starless.", "logic": "\nMerged(bianca)\nRapt(bianca)\nStarless(bianca)\nGangling(bianca)\nMendicant(polly)\nDivided(eugene)\nRapt(mufinella)\nforall x (Divided(x) and Rapt(x) -> Mendicant(x))\nThorough(mufinella) -> Divided(mufinella)\nforall x (Mendicant(x) -> Thorough(x))\nThorough(eugene) -> Merged(eugene)\nforall x (Divided(x) and Mendicant(x) -> Rapt(x))\nforall x (Starless(x) -> Merged(x))\nforall x (Merged(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Gangling(x) and Divided(x) -> Merged(x))\n\nStarless(mufinella)\n\nStarless(mufinella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Reece is nonexempt. Reece is interested. Reece is gushing. Reece is colonised. Amelia is confutable. Isabella is cryptic. Gabriella is interested. All cryptic, interested people are confutable. If Gabriella is conductive then Gabriella is cryptic. All confutable people are conductive. If Isabella is conductive then Isabella is nonexempt. Quiet, confutable people are interested. Round people are nonexempt. All nonexempt people are cryptic. All colonised, cryptic people are nonexempt. Isabella is not colonised.", "logic": "\nNonexempt(reece)\nInterested(reece)\nGushing(reece)\nColonised(reece)\nConfutable(amelia)\nCryptic(isabella)\nInterested(gabriella)\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and Interested(x) -> Confutable(x))\nConductive(gabriella) -> Cryptic(gabriella)\nforall x (Confutable(x) -> Conductive(x))\nConductive(isabella) -> Nonexempt(isabella)\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and Confutable(x) -> Interested(x))\nforall x (Gushing(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Cryptic(x))\nforall x (Colonised(x) and Cryptic(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\n\nnot Colonised(isabella)\n\nnot Colonised(isabella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "Hansel is nativist. Hansel is republican. Hansel is malayan. Hansel is learned. Micky is expedient. Westley is plucked. Tyrone is republican. All plucked, republican people are expedient. If Tyrone is maiden then Tyrone is plucked. All expedient people are maiden. If Westley is maiden then Westley is nativist. Quiet, expedient people are republican. Round people are nativist. All nativist people are plucked. All learned, plucked people are nativist. Tyrone is learned.", "logic": "\nNativist(hansel)\nRepublican(hansel)\nMalayan(hansel)\nLearned(hansel)\nExpedient(micky)\nPlucked(westley)\nRepublican(tyrone)\nforall x (Plucked(x) and Republican(x) -> Expedient(x))\nMaiden(tyrone) -> Plucked(tyrone)\nforall x (Expedient(x) -> Maiden(x))\nMaiden(westley) -> Nativist(westley)\nforall x (Plucked(x) and Expedient(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Malayan(x) -> Nativist(x))\nforall x (Nativist(x) -> Plucked(x))\nforall x (Learned(x) and Plucked(x) -> Nativist(x))\n\nLearned(tyrone)\n\nLearned(tyrone) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2156"} {"premises": "The melisande crossruff the goldi. The melisande literalize the goldi. The melisande is songful. The melisande is verbatim. The melisande is craven. The melisande is unselfish. The melisande is doric. The melisande kennel the goldi. The goldi crossruff the melisande. The goldi literalize the melisande. The goldi is songful. The goldi is verbatim. The goldi is craven. The goldi is unselfish. The goldi kennel the melisande. If someone is doric then they are unselfish. If someone is doric then they need the goldi. If someone literalize the goldi then they chase the melisande. If someone kennel the melisande then the melisande is doric. If someone kennel the goldi then the goldi is verbatim. If someone kennel the goldi then the goldi is doric. The melisande kennel the goldi.", "logic": "\nCrossruff(melisande, goldi)\nLiteralize(melisande, goldi)\nSongful(melisande)\nVerbatim(melisande)\nCraven(melisande)\nUnselfish(melisande)\nDoric(melisande)\nKennel(melisande, goldi)\nCrossruff(goldi, melisande)\nLiteralize(goldi, melisande)\nSongful(goldi)\nVerbatim(goldi)\nCraven(goldi)\nUnselfish(goldi)\nKennel(goldi, melisande)\nforall x (Doric(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Doric(x) -> Kennel(x, goldi))\nforall x (Literalize(x, goldi) -> Crossruff(x, melisande))\nforall x (Kennel(x, melisande) -> Doric(melisande))\nforall x (Kennel(x, goldi) -> Verbatim(goldi))\nforall x (Kennel(x, goldi) -> Doric(goldi))\n\nKennel(melisande, goldi)\n\ntherefore Kennel(melisande, goldi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The peri bushel the pippy. The peri glisten the pippy. The peri is balzacian. The peri is puckish. The peri is devalued. The peri is chambered. The peri is sloshed. The peri indemnify the pippy. The pippy bushel the peri. The pippy glisten the peri. The pippy is balzacian. The pippy is puckish. The pippy is devalued. The pippy is chambered. The pippy indemnify the peri. If someone is sloshed then they are chambered. If someone is sloshed then they need the pippy. If someone glisten the pippy then they chase the peri. If someone indemnify the peri then the peri is sloshed. If someone indemnify the pippy then the pippy is puckish. If someone indemnify the pippy then the pippy is sloshed. The peri is not balzacian.", "logic": "\nBushel(peri, pippy)\nGlisten(peri, pippy)\nBalzacian(peri)\nPuckish(peri)\nDevalued(peri)\nChambered(peri)\nSloshed(peri)\nIndemnify(peri, pippy)\nBushel(pippy, peri)\nGlisten(pippy, peri)\nBalzacian(pippy)\nPuckish(pippy)\nDevalued(pippy)\nChambered(pippy)\nIndemnify(pippy, peri)\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Chambered(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Indemnify(x, pippy))\nforall x (Glisten(x, pippy) -> Bushel(x, peri))\nforall x (Indemnify(x, peri) -> Sloshed(peri))\nforall x (Indemnify(x, pippy) -> Puckish(pippy))\nforall x (Indemnify(x, pippy) -> Sloshed(pippy))\n\nnot Balzacian(peri)\n\ntherefore Balzacian(peri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The pen shepherd the myrta. The pen pucker the myrta. The pen is uninfected. The pen is detected. The pen is edentulate. The pen is lxxxv. The pen is outmoded. The pen fress the myrta. The myrta shepherd the pen. The myrta pucker the pen. The myrta is uninfected. The myrta is detected. The myrta is edentulate. The myrta is lxxxv. The myrta fress the pen. If someone is outmoded then they are lxxxv. If someone is outmoded then they need the myrta. If someone pucker the myrta then they chase the pen. If someone fress the pen then the pen is outmoded. If someone fress the myrta then the myrta is detected. If someone fress the myrta then the myrta is outmoded. The myrta is outmoded.", "logic": "\nShepherd(pen, myrta)\nPucker(pen, myrta)\nUninfected(pen)\nDetected(pen)\nEdentulate(pen)\nLxxxv(pen)\nOutmoded(pen)\nFress(pen, myrta)\nShepherd(myrta, pen)\nPucker(myrta, pen)\nUninfected(myrta)\nDetected(myrta)\nEdentulate(myrta)\nLxxxv(myrta)\nFress(myrta, pen)\nforall x (Outmoded(x) -> Lxxxv(x))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) -> Fress(x, myrta))\nforall x (Pucker(x, myrta) -> Shepherd(x, pen))\nforall x (Fress(x, pen) -> Outmoded(pen))\nforall x (Fress(x, myrta) -> Detected(myrta))\nforall x (Fress(x, myrta) -> Outmoded(myrta))\n\nOutmoded(myrta)\n\nFress(pen, myrta) and forall x (Fress(x, myrta) -> Outmoded(myrta)) -> therefore Outmoded(myrta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The matt ripple the alfredo. The matt broider the alfredo. The matt is dendriform. The matt is cumbersome. The matt is caseous. The matt is aciduric. The matt is profound. The matt negate the alfredo. The alfredo ripple the matt. The alfredo broider the matt. The alfredo is dendriform. The alfredo is cumbersome. The alfredo is caseous. The alfredo is aciduric. The alfredo negate the matt. If someone is profound then they are aciduric. If someone is profound then they need the alfredo. If someone broider the alfredo then they chase the matt. If someone negate the matt then the matt is profound. If someone negate the alfredo then the alfredo is cumbersome. If someone negate the alfredo then the alfredo is profound. The matt does not chase the matt.", "logic": "\nRipple(matt, alfredo)\nBroider(matt, alfredo)\nDendriform(matt)\nCumbersome(matt)\nCaseous(matt)\nAciduric(matt)\nProfound(matt)\nNegate(matt, alfredo)\nRipple(alfredo, matt)\nBroider(alfredo, matt)\nDendriform(alfredo)\nCumbersome(alfredo)\nCaseous(alfredo)\nAciduric(alfredo)\nNegate(alfredo, matt)\nforall x (Profound(x) -> Aciduric(x))\nforall x (Profound(x) -> Negate(x, alfredo))\nforall x (Broider(x, alfredo) -> Ripple(x, matt))\nforall x (Negate(x, matt) -> Profound(matt))\nforall x (Negate(x, alfredo) -> Cumbersome(alfredo))\nforall x (Negate(x, alfredo) -> Profound(alfredo))\n\nnot Ripple(matt, matt)\n\nBroider(matt, alfredo) and forall x (Broider(x, alfredo) -> Ripple(x, matt)) -> therefore Ripple(matt, matt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The mae gluttonize the wandie. The mae worry the wandie. The mae is angelical. The mae is prudish. The mae is unforeseen. The mae is restful. The mae is gibbose. The mae pile the wandie. The wandie gluttonize the mae. The wandie worry the mae. The wandie is angelical. The wandie is prudish. The wandie is unforeseen. The wandie is restful. The wandie pile the mae. If someone is gibbose then they are restful. If someone is gibbose then they need the wandie. If someone worry the wandie then they chase the mae. If someone pile the mae then the mae is gibbose. If someone pile the wandie then the wandie is prudish. If someone pile the wandie then the wandie is gibbose. The wandie pile the wandie.", "logic": "\nGluttonize(mae, wandie)\nWorry(mae, wandie)\nAngelical(mae)\nPrudish(mae)\nUnforeseen(mae)\nRestful(mae)\nGibbose(mae)\nPile(mae, wandie)\nGluttonize(wandie, mae)\nWorry(wandie, mae)\nAngelical(wandie)\nPrudish(wandie)\nUnforeseen(wandie)\nRestful(wandie)\nPile(wandie, mae)\nforall x (Gibbose(x) -> Restful(x))\nforall x (Gibbose(x) -> Pile(x, wandie))\nforall x (Worry(x, wandie) -> Gluttonize(x, mae))\nforall x (Pile(x, mae) -> Gibbose(mae))\nforall x (Pile(x, wandie) -> Prudish(wandie))\nforall x (Pile(x, wandie) -> Gibbose(wandie))\n\nPile(wandie, wandie)\n\nPile(mae, wandie) and forall x (Pile(x, wandie) -> Gibbose(wandie)) -> therefore Gibbose(wandie) Gibbose(wandie) and forall x (Gibbose(x) -> Pile(x, wandie)) -> therefore Pile(wandie, wandie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The ingamar demand the nisse. The ingamar hybridise the nisse. The ingamar is enchanting. The ingamar is unfearing. The ingamar is wonted. The ingamar is thermoset. The ingamar is chirpy. The ingamar scud the nisse. The nisse demand the ingamar. The nisse hybridise the ingamar. The nisse is enchanting. The nisse is unfearing. The nisse is wonted. The nisse is thermoset. The nisse scud the ingamar. If someone is chirpy then they are thermoset. If someone is chirpy then they need the nisse. If someone hybridise the nisse then they chase the ingamar. If someone scud the ingamar then the ingamar is chirpy. If someone scud the nisse then the nisse is unfearing. If someone scud the nisse then the nisse is chirpy. The nisse does not need the nisse.", "logic": "\nDemand(ingamar, nisse)\nHybridise(ingamar, nisse)\nEnchanting(ingamar)\nUnfearing(ingamar)\nWonted(ingamar)\nThermoset(ingamar)\nChirpy(ingamar)\nScud(ingamar, nisse)\nDemand(nisse, ingamar)\nHybridise(nisse, ingamar)\nEnchanting(nisse)\nUnfearing(nisse)\nWonted(nisse)\nThermoset(nisse)\nScud(nisse, ingamar)\nforall x (Chirpy(x) -> Thermoset(x))\nforall x (Chirpy(x) -> Scud(x, nisse))\nforall x (Hybridise(x, nisse) -> Demand(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Scud(x, ingamar) -> Chirpy(ingamar))\nforall x (Scud(x, nisse) -> Unfearing(nisse))\nforall x (Scud(x, nisse) -> Chirpy(nisse))\n\nnot Scud(nisse, nisse)\n\nScud(ingamar, nisse) and forall x (Scud(x, nisse) -> Chirpy(nisse)) -> therefore Chirpy(nisse) Chirpy(nisse) and forall x (Chirpy(x) -> Scud(x, nisse)) -> therefore Scud(nisse, nisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The swen yowl the morton. The swen bevel the morton. The swen is handled. The swen is nonporous. The swen is centrist. The swen is methodist. The swen is socratic. The swen plough the morton. The morton yowl the swen. The morton bevel the swen. The morton is handled. The morton is nonporous. The morton is centrist. The morton is methodist. The morton plough the swen. If someone is socratic then they are methodist. If someone is socratic then they need the morton. If someone bevel the morton then they chase the swen. If someone plough the swen then the swen is socratic. If someone plough the morton then the morton is nonporous. If someone plough the morton then the morton is socratic. The morton does not eat the morton.", "logic": "\nYowl(swen, morton)\nBevel(swen, morton)\nHandled(swen)\nNonporous(swen)\nCentrist(swen)\nMethodist(swen)\nSocratic(swen)\nPlough(swen, morton)\nYowl(morton, swen)\nBevel(morton, swen)\nHandled(morton)\nNonporous(morton)\nCentrist(morton)\nMethodist(morton)\nPlough(morton, swen)\nforall x (Socratic(x) -> Methodist(x))\nforall x (Socratic(x) -> Plough(x, morton))\nforall x (Bevel(x, morton) -> Yowl(x, swen))\nforall x (Plough(x, swen) -> Socratic(swen))\nforall x (Plough(x, morton) -> Nonporous(morton))\nforall x (Plough(x, morton) -> Socratic(morton))\n\nnot Bevel(morton, morton)\n\nnot Bevel(morton, morton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The conney outsail the rubetta. The conney file the rubetta. The conney is lxxiv. The conney is volumetric. The conney is dyspeptic. The conney is especial. The conney is negative. The conney forward the rubetta. The rubetta outsail the conney. The rubetta file the conney. The rubetta is lxxiv. The rubetta is volumetric. The rubetta is dyspeptic. The rubetta is especial. The rubetta forward the conney. If someone is negative then they are especial. If someone is negative then they need the rubetta. If someone file the rubetta then they chase the conney. If someone forward the conney then the conney is negative. If someone forward the rubetta then the rubetta is volumetric. If someone forward the rubetta then the rubetta is negative. The conney file the conney.", "logic": "\nOutsail(conney, rubetta)\nFile(conney, rubetta)\nLxxiv(conney)\nVolumetric(conney)\nDyspeptic(conney)\nEspecial(conney)\nNegative(conney)\nForward(conney, rubetta)\nOutsail(rubetta, conney)\nFile(rubetta, conney)\nLxxiv(rubetta)\nVolumetric(rubetta)\nDyspeptic(rubetta)\nEspecial(rubetta)\nForward(rubetta, conney)\nforall x (Negative(x) -> Especial(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) -> Forward(x, rubetta))\nforall x (File(x, rubetta) -> Outsail(x, conney))\nforall x (Forward(x, conney) -> Negative(conney))\nforall x (Forward(x, rubetta) -> Volumetric(rubetta))\nforall x (Forward(x, rubetta) -> Negative(rubetta))\n\nFile(conney, conney)\n\nFile(conney, conney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The susannah brainstorm the cookie. The susannah corduroy the cookie. The susannah is detersive. The susannah is bowery. The susannah is epimorphic. The susannah is cursive. The susannah is disjointed. The susannah embank the cookie. The cookie brainstorm the susannah. The cookie corduroy the susannah. The cookie is detersive. The cookie is bowery. The cookie is epimorphic. The cookie is cursive. The cookie embank the susannah. If someone is disjointed then they are cursive. If someone is disjointed then they need the cookie. If someone corduroy the cookie then they chase the susannah. If someone embank the susannah then the susannah is disjointed. If someone embank the cookie then the cookie is bowery. If someone embank the cookie then the cookie is disjointed. The susannah does not need the susannah.", "logic": "\nBrainstorm(susannah, cookie)\nCorduroy(susannah, cookie)\nDetersive(susannah)\nBowery(susannah)\nEpimorphic(susannah)\nCursive(susannah)\nDisjointed(susannah)\nEmbank(susannah, cookie)\nBrainstorm(cookie, susannah)\nCorduroy(cookie, susannah)\nDetersive(cookie)\nBowery(cookie)\nEpimorphic(cookie)\nCursive(cookie)\nEmbank(cookie, susannah)\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Cursive(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Embank(x, cookie))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, cookie) -> Brainstorm(x, susannah))\nforall x (Embank(x, susannah) -> Disjointed(susannah))\nforall x (Embank(x, cookie) -> Bowery(cookie))\nforall x (Embank(x, cookie) -> Disjointed(cookie))\n\nnot Embank(susannah, susannah)\n\nnot Embank(susannah, susannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The tobin hoof the angelita. The tobin vivisect the angelita. The tobin is heroical. The tobin is gestural. The tobin is winy. The tobin is boskopoid. The tobin is sexless. The tobin salivate the angelita. The angelita hoof the tobin. The angelita vivisect the tobin. The angelita is heroical. The angelita is gestural. The angelita is winy. The angelita is boskopoid. The angelita salivate the tobin. If someone is sexless then they are boskopoid. If someone is sexless then they need the angelita. If someone vivisect the angelita then they chase the tobin. If someone salivate the tobin then the tobin is sexless. If someone salivate the angelita then the angelita is gestural. If someone salivate the angelita then the angelita is sexless. The angelita hoof the angelita.", "logic": "\nHoof(tobin, angelita)\nVivisect(tobin, angelita)\nHeroical(tobin)\nGestural(tobin)\nWiny(tobin)\nBoskopoid(tobin)\nSexless(tobin)\nSalivate(tobin, angelita)\nHoof(angelita, tobin)\nVivisect(angelita, tobin)\nHeroical(angelita)\nGestural(angelita)\nWiny(angelita)\nBoskopoid(angelita)\nSalivate(angelita, tobin)\nforall x (Sexless(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Sexless(x) -> Salivate(x, angelita))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, angelita) -> Hoof(x, tobin))\nforall x (Salivate(x, tobin) -> Sexless(tobin))\nforall x (Salivate(x, angelita) -> Gestural(angelita))\nforall x (Salivate(x, angelita) -> Sexless(angelita))\n\nHoof(angelita, angelita)\n\nHoof(angelita, angelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1552"} {"premises": "The wenonah despatch the tymothy. The wenonah frown the weylin. The wenonah chine the weylin. The weylin despatch the anatole. The weylin is indonesian. The weylin chine the tymothy. The anatole despatch the tymothy. The anatole chine the tymothy. The tymothy frown the anatole. The tymothy chine the weylin. If someone frown the weylin and they like the anatole then the anatole chine the wenonah. If someone chine the wenonah and the wenonah is cometic then they are indonesian. If someone despatch the tymothy and the tymothy frown the anatole then the tymothy chine the weylin. If someone chine the tymothy and the tymothy is completing then they eat the tymothy. If someone frown the weylin then the weylin chine the anatole. If someone despatch the wenonah then the wenonah is indonesian. If someone frown the anatole and they eat the tymothy then the anatole is cometic. If someone frown the anatole then they eat the tymothy. The weylin despatch the anatole.", "logic": "\nDespatch(wenonah, tymothy)\nFrown(wenonah, weylin)\nChine(wenonah, weylin)\nDespatch(weylin, anatole)\nIndonesian(weylin)\nChine(weylin, tymothy)\nDespatch(anatole, tymothy)\nChine(anatole, tymothy)\nFrown(tymothy, anatole)\nChine(tymothy, weylin)\nforall x (Frown(x, weylin) and Frown(x, anatole) -> Chine(anatole, wenonah))\nforall x (Chine(x, wenonah) and Cometic(wenonah) -> Indonesian(x))\nforall x (Despatch(x, tymothy) and Frown(tymothy, anatole) -> Chine(tymothy, weylin))\nforall x (Chine(x, tymothy) and Completing(tymothy) -> Despatch(x, tymothy))\nforall x (Frown(x, weylin) -> Chine(weylin, anatole))\nforall x (Despatch(x, wenonah) -> Indonesian(wenonah))\nforall x (Frown(x, anatole) and Despatch(x, tymothy) -> Cometic(anatole))\nforall x (Frown(x, anatole) -> Despatch(x, tymothy))\n\nDespatch(weylin, anatole)\n\ntherefore Despatch(weylin, anatole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The feliza protrude the porter. The feliza guzzle the marilu. The feliza wire the marilu. The marilu protrude the rodger. The marilu is mesonic. The marilu wire the porter. The rodger protrude the porter. The rodger wire the porter. The porter guzzle the rodger. The porter wire the marilu. If someone guzzle the marilu and they like the rodger then the rodger wire the feliza. If someone wire the feliza and the feliza is nonhuman then they are mesonic. If someone protrude the porter and the porter guzzle the rodger then the porter wire the marilu. If someone wire the porter and the porter is supposable then they eat the porter. If someone guzzle the marilu then the marilu wire the rodger. If someone protrude the feliza then the feliza is mesonic. If someone guzzle the rodger and they eat the porter then the rodger is nonhuman. If someone guzzle the rodger then they eat the porter. The rodger does not need the porter.", "logic": "\nProtrude(feliza, porter)\nGuzzle(feliza, marilu)\nWire(feliza, marilu)\nProtrude(marilu, rodger)\nMesonic(marilu)\nWire(marilu, porter)\nProtrude(rodger, porter)\nWire(rodger, porter)\nGuzzle(porter, rodger)\nWire(porter, marilu)\nforall x (Guzzle(x, marilu) and Guzzle(x, rodger) -> Wire(rodger, feliza))\nforall x (Wire(x, feliza) and Nonhuman(feliza) -> Mesonic(x))\nforall x (Protrude(x, porter) and Guzzle(porter, rodger) -> Wire(porter, marilu))\nforall x (Wire(x, porter) and Supposable(porter) -> Protrude(x, porter))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, marilu) -> Wire(marilu, rodger))\nforall x (Protrude(x, feliza) -> Mesonic(feliza))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, rodger) and Protrude(x, porter) -> Nonhuman(rodger))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, rodger) -> Protrude(x, porter))\n\nnot Wire(rodger, porter)\n\ntherefore Wire(rodger, porter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The lulu sound the estell. The lulu profiteer the darla. The lulu negate the darla. The darla sound the malena. The darla is elysian. The darla negate the estell. The malena sound the estell. The malena negate the estell. The estell profiteer the malena. The estell negate the darla. If someone profiteer the darla and they like the malena then the malena negate the lulu. If someone negate the lulu and the lulu is improving then they are elysian. If someone sound the estell and the estell profiteer the malena then the estell negate the darla. If someone negate the estell and the estell is areolar then they eat the estell. If someone profiteer the darla then the darla negate the malena. If someone sound the lulu then the lulu is elysian. If someone profiteer the malena and they eat the estell then the malena is improving. If someone profiteer the malena then they eat the estell. The darla negate the malena.", "logic": "\nSound(lulu, estell)\nProfiteer(lulu, darla)\nNegate(lulu, darla)\nSound(darla, malena)\nElysian(darla)\nNegate(darla, estell)\nSound(malena, estell)\nNegate(malena, estell)\nProfiteer(estell, malena)\nNegate(estell, darla)\nforall x (Profiteer(x, darla) and Profiteer(x, malena) -> Negate(malena, lulu))\nforall x (Negate(x, lulu) and Improving(lulu) -> Elysian(x))\nforall x (Sound(x, estell) and Profiteer(estell, malena) -> Negate(estell, darla))\nforall x (Negate(x, estell) and Areolar(estell) -> Sound(x, estell))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, darla) -> Negate(darla, malena))\nforall x (Sound(x, lulu) -> Elysian(lulu))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, malena) and Sound(x, estell) -> Improving(malena))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, malena) -> Sound(x, estell))\n\nNegate(darla, malena)\n\nProfiteer(lulu, darla) and forall x (Profiteer(x, darla) -> Negate(darla, malena)) -> therefore Negate(darla, malena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The duffie deprive the audra. The duffie hemstitch the valli. The duffie toot the valli. The valli deprive the sybil. The valli is crippled. The valli toot the audra. The sybil deprive the audra. The sybil toot the audra. The audra hemstitch the sybil. The audra toot the valli. If someone hemstitch the valli and they like the sybil then the sybil toot the duffie. If someone toot the duffie and the duffie is sought then they are crippled. If someone deprive the audra and the audra hemstitch the sybil then the audra toot the valli. If someone toot the audra and the audra is sacred then they eat the audra. If someone hemstitch the valli then the valli toot the sybil. If someone deprive the duffie then the duffie is crippled. If someone hemstitch the sybil and they eat the audra then the sybil is sought. If someone hemstitch the sybil then they eat the audra. The valli does not need the sybil.", "logic": "\nDeprive(duffie, audra)\nHemstitch(duffie, valli)\nToot(duffie, valli)\nDeprive(valli, sybil)\nCrippled(valli)\nToot(valli, audra)\nDeprive(sybil, audra)\nToot(sybil, audra)\nHemstitch(audra, sybil)\nToot(audra, valli)\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, valli) and Hemstitch(x, sybil) -> Toot(sybil, duffie))\nforall x (Toot(x, duffie) and Sought(duffie) -> Crippled(x))\nforall x (Deprive(x, audra) and Hemstitch(audra, sybil) -> Toot(audra, valli))\nforall x (Toot(x, audra) and Sacred(audra) -> Deprive(x, audra))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, valli) -> Toot(valli, sybil))\nforall x (Deprive(x, duffie) -> Crippled(duffie))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, sybil) and Deprive(x, audra) -> Sought(sybil))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, sybil) -> Deprive(x, audra))\n\nnot Toot(valli, sybil)\n\nHemstitch(duffie, valli) and forall x (Hemstitch(x, valli) -> Toot(valli, sybil)) -> therefore Toot(valli, sybil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The marilin cherish the blancha. The marilin arrange the edithe. The marilin destroy the edithe. The edithe cherish the riki. The edithe is anchoritic. The edithe destroy the blancha. The riki cherish the blancha. The riki destroy the blancha. The blancha arrange the riki. The blancha destroy the edithe. If someone arrange the edithe and they like the riki then the riki destroy the marilin. If someone destroy the marilin and the marilin is roadless then they are anchoritic. If someone cherish the blancha and the blancha arrange the riki then the blancha destroy the edithe. If someone destroy the blancha and the blancha is reanimated then they eat the blancha. If someone arrange the edithe then the edithe destroy the riki. If someone cherish the marilin then the marilin is anchoritic. If someone arrange the riki and they eat the blancha then the riki is roadless. If someone arrange the riki then they eat the blancha. The riki is roadless.", "logic": "\nCherish(marilin, blancha)\nArrange(marilin, edithe)\nDestroy(marilin, edithe)\nCherish(edithe, riki)\nAnchoritic(edithe)\nDestroy(edithe, blancha)\nCherish(riki, blancha)\nDestroy(riki, blancha)\nArrange(blancha, riki)\nDestroy(blancha, edithe)\nforall x (Arrange(x, edithe) and Arrange(x, riki) -> Destroy(riki, marilin))\nforall x (Destroy(x, marilin) and Roadless(marilin) -> Anchoritic(x))\nforall x (Cherish(x, blancha) and Arrange(blancha, riki) -> Destroy(blancha, edithe))\nforall x (Destroy(x, blancha) and Reanimated(blancha) -> Cherish(x, blancha))\nforall x (Arrange(x, edithe) -> Destroy(edithe, riki))\nforall x (Cherish(x, marilin) -> Anchoritic(marilin))\nforall x (Arrange(x, riki) and Cherish(x, blancha) -> Roadless(riki))\nforall x (Arrange(x, riki) -> Cherish(x, blancha))\n\nRoadless(riki)\n\nArrange(blancha, riki) and forall x (Arrange(x, riki) -> Cherish(x, blancha)) -> therefore Cherish(blancha, blancha) Arrange(blancha, riki) and Cherish(blancha, blancha) and forall x (Arrange(x, riki) and Cherish(x, blancha) -> Roadless(riki)) -> therefore Roadless(riki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The tobit biodegrade the calvin. The tobit reconcile the tanny. The tobit defeminize the tanny. The tanny biodegrade the estell. The tanny is jeweled. The tanny defeminize the calvin. The estell biodegrade the calvin. The estell defeminize the calvin. The calvin reconcile the estell. The calvin defeminize the tanny. If someone reconcile the tanny and they like the estell then the estell defeminize the tobit. If someone defeminize the tobit and the tobit is undying then they are jeweled. If someone biodegrade the calvin and the calvin reconcile the estell then the calvin defeminize the tanny. If someone defeminize the calvin and the calvin is adoring then they eat the calvin. If someone reconcile the tanny then the tanny defeminize the estell. If someone biodegrade the tobit then the tobit is jeweled. If someone reconcile the estell and they eat the calvin then the estell is undying. If someone reconcile the estell then they eat the calvin. The estell is not undying.", "logic": "\nBiodegrade(tobit, calvin)\nReconcile(tobit, tanny)\nDefeminize(tobit, tanny)\nBiodegrade(tanny, estell)\nJeweled(tanny)\nDefeminize(tanny, calvin)\nBiodegrade(estell, calvin)\nDefeminize(estell, calvin)\nReconcile(calvin, estell)\nDefeminize(calvin, tanny)\nforall x (Reconcile(x, tanny) and Reconcile(x, estell) -> Defeminize(estell, tobit))\nforall x (Defeminize(x, tobit) and Undying(tobit) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Biodegrade(x, calvin) and Reconcile(calvin, estell) -> Defeminize(calvin, tanny))\nforall x (Defeminize(x, calvin) and Adoring(calvin) -> Biodegrade(x, calvin))\nforall x (Reconcile(x, tanny) -> Defeminize(tanny, estell))\nforall x (Biodegrade(x, tobit) -> Jeweled(tobit))\nforall x (Reconcile(x, estell) and Biodegrade(x, calvin) -> Undying(estell))\nforall x (Reconcile(x, estell) -> Biodegrade(x, calvin))\n\nnot Undying(estell)\n\nReconcile(calvin, estell) and forall x (Reconcile(x, estell) -> Biodegrade(x, calvin)) -> therefore Biodegrade(calvin, calvin) Reconcile(calvin, estell) and Biodegrade(calvin, calvin) and forall x (Reconcile(x, estell) and Biodegrade(x, calvin) -> Undying(estell)) -> therefore Undying(estell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The twila apotheose the paulina. The twila raid the jake. The twila insolate the jake. The jake apotheose the terrie. The jake is unfueled. The jake insolate the paulina. The terrie apotheose the paulina. The terrie insolate the paulina. The paulina raid the terrie. The paulina insolate the jake. If someone raid the jake and they like the terrie then the terrie insolate the twila. If someone insolate the twila and the twila is limp then they are unfueled. If someone apotheose the paulina and the paulina raid the terrie then the paulina insolate the jake. If someone insolate the paulina and the paulina is branchless then they eat the paulina. If someone raid the jake then the jake insolate the terrie. If someone apotheose the twila then the twila is unfueled. If someone raid the terrie and they eat the paulina then the terrie is limp. If someone raid the terrie then they eat the paulina. The terrie does not need the twila.", "logic": "\nApotheose(twila, paulina)\nRaid(twila, jake)\nInsolate(twila, jake)\nApotheose(jake, terrie)\nUnfueled(jake)\nInsolate(jake, paulina)\nApotheose(terrie, paulina)\nInsolate(terrie, paulina)\nRaid(paulina, terrie)\nInsolate(paulina, jake)\nforall x (Raid(x, jake) and Raid(x, terrie) -> Insolate(terrie, twila))\nforall x (Insolate(x, twila) and Limp(twila) -> Unfueled(x))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, paulina) and Raid(paulina, terrie) -> Insolate(paulina, jake))\nforall x (Insolate(x, paulina) and Branchless(paulina) -> Apotheose(x, paulina))\nforall x (Raid(x, jake) -> Insolate(jake, terrie))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, twila) -> Unfueled(twila))\nforall x (Raid(x, terrie) and Apotheose(x, paulina) -> Limp(terrie))\nforall x (Raid(x, terrie) -> Apotheose(x, paulina))\n\nnot Insolate(terrie, twila)\n\nforall x (Raid(x, jake) and Raid(x, terrie) -> Insolate(terrie, twila)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The renelle resist the lenka. The renelle imprecate the madalyn. The renelle chrome the madalyn. The madalyn resist the christyna. The madalyn is doting. The madalyn chrome the lenka. The christyna resist the lenka. The christyna chrome the lenka. The lenka imprecate the christyna. The lenka chrome the madalyn. If someone imprecate the madalyn and they like the christyna then the christyna chrome the renelle. If someone chrome the renelle and the renelle is flexuous then they are doting. If someone resist the lenka and the lenka imprecate the christyna then the lenka chrome the madalyn. If someone chrome the lenka and the lenka is lavender then they eat the lenka. If someone imprecate the madalyn then the madalyn chrome the christyna. If someone resist the renelle then the renelle is doting. If someone imprecate the christyna and they eat the lenka then the christyna is flexuous. If someone imprecate the christyna then they eat the lenka. The madalyn resist the lenka.", "logic": "\nResist(renelle, lenka)\nImprecate(renelle, madalyn)\nChrome(renelle, madalyn)\nResist(madalyn, christyna)\nDoting(madalyn)\nChrome(madalyn, lenka)\nResist(christyna, lenka)\nChrome(christyna, lenka)\nImprecate(lenka, christyna)\nChrome(lenka, madalyn)\nforall x (Imprecate(x, madalyn) and Imprecate(x, christyna) -> Chrome(christyna, renelle))\nforall x (Chrome(x, renelle) and Flexuous(renelle) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Resist(x, lenka) and Imprecate(lenka, christyna) -> Chrome(lenka, madalyn))\nforall x (Chrome(x, lenka) and Lavender(lenka) -> Resist(x, lenka))\nforall x (Imprecate(x, madalyn) -> Chrome(madalyn, christyna))\nforall x (Resist(x, renelle) -> Doting(renelle))\nforall x (Imprecate(x, christyna) and Resist(x, lenka) -> Flexuous(christyna))\nforall x (Imprecate(x, christyna) -> Resist(x, lenka))\n\nResist(madalyn, lenka)\n\nforall x (Chrome(x, lenka) and Lavender(lenka) -> Resist(x, lenka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The dolli empty the damaris. The dolli josh the lewis. The dolli unyoke the lewis. The lewis empty the sharia. The lewis is syphilitic. The lewis unyoke the damaris. The sharia empty the damaris. The sharia unyoke the damaris. The damaris josh the sharia. The damaris unyoke the lewis. If someone josh the lewis and they like the sharia then the sharia unyoke the dolli. If someone unyoke the dolli and the dolli is atheist then they are syphilitic. If someone empty the damaris and the damaris josh the sharia then the damaris unyoke the lewis. If someone unyoke the damaris and the damaris is newsworthy then they eat the damaris. If someone josh the lewis then the lewis unyoke the sharia. If someone empty the dolli then the dolli is syphilitic. If someone josh the sharia and they eat the damaris then the sharia is atheist. If someone josh the sharia then they eat the damaris. The dolli is not syphilitic.", "logic": "\nEmpty(dolli, damaris)\nJosh(dolli, lewis)\nUnyoke(dolli, lewis)\nEmpty(lewis, sharia)\nSyphilitic(lewis)\nUnyoke(lewis, damaris)\nEmpty(sharia, damaris)\nUnyoke(sharia, damaris)\nJosh(damaris, sharia)\nUnyoke(damaris, lewis)\nforall x (Josh(x, lewis) and Josh(x, sharia) -> Unyoke(sharia, dolli))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, dolli) and Atheist(dolli) -> Syphilitic(x))\nforall x (Empty(x, damaris) and Josh(damaris, sharia) -> Unyoke(damaris, lewis))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, damaris) and Newsworthy(damaris) -> Empty(x, damaris))\nforall x (Josh(x, lewis) -> Unyoke(lewis, sharia))\nforall x (Empty(x, dolli) -> Syphilitic(dolli))\nforall x (Josh(x, sharia) and Empty(x, damaris) -> Atheist(sharia))\nforall x (Josh(x, sharia) -> Empty(x, damaris))\n\nnot Syphilitic(dolli)\n\nforall x (Unyoke(x, dolli) and Atheist(dolli) -> Syphilitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The tatiana punish the elena. The tatiana describe the cole. The tatiana overhang the cole. The cole punish the dory. The cole is sisterlike. The cole overhang the elena. The dory punish the elena. The dory overhang the elena. The elena describe the dory. The elena overhang the cole. If someone describe the cole and they like the dory then the dory overhang the tatiana. If someone overhang the tatiana and the tatiana is upset then they are sisterlike. If someone punish the elena and the elena describe the dory then the elena overhang the cole. If someone overhang the elena and the elena is mass then they eat the elena. If someone describe the cole then the cole overhang the dory. If someone punish the tatiana then the tatiana is sisterlike. If someone describe the dory and they eat the elena then the dory is upset. If someone describe the dory then they eat the elena. The elena describe the tatiana.", "logic": "\nPunish(tatiana, elena)\nDescribe(tatiana, cole)\nOverhang(tatiana, cole)\nPunish(cole, dory)\nSisterlike(cole)\nOverhang(cole, elena)\nPunish(dory, elena)\nOverhang(dory, elena)\nDescribe(elena, dory)\nOverhang(elena, cole)\nforall x (Describe(x, cole) and Describe(x, dory) -> Overhang(dory, tatiana))\nforall x (Overhang(x, tatiana) and Upset(tatiana) -> Sisterlike(x))\nforall x (Punish(x, elena) and Describe(elena, dory) -> Overhang(elena, cole))\nforall x (Overhang(x, elena) and Mass(elena) -> Punish(x, elena))\nforall x (Describe(x, cole) -> Overhang(cole, dory))\nforall x (Punish(x, tatiana) -> Sisterlike(tatiana))\nforall x (Describe(x, dory) and Punish(x, elena) -> Upset(dory))\nforall x (Describe(x, dory) -> Punish(x, elena))\n\nDescribe(elena, tatiana)\n\nDescribe(elena, tatiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The celisse heliograph the joceline. The celisse substitute the nikolai. The celisse shmooze the nikolai. The nikolai heliograph the lilli. The nikolai is stormproof. The nikolai shmooze the joceline. The lilli heliograph the joceline. The lilli shmooze the joceline. The joceline substitute the lilli. The joceline shmooze the nikolai. If someone substitute the nikolai and they like the lilli then the lilli shmooze the celisse. If someone shmooze the celisse and the celisse is marine then they are stormproof. If someone heliograph the joceline and the joceline substitute the lilli then the joceline shmooze the nikolai. If someone shmooze the joceline and the joceline is irascible then they eat the joceline. If someone substitute the nikolai then the nikolai shmooze the lilli. If someone heliograph the celisse then the celisse is stormproof. If someone substitute the lilli and they eat the joceline then the lilli is marine. If someone substitute the lilli then they eat the joceline. The celisse does not need the lilli.", "logic": "\nHeliograph(celisse, joceline)\nSubstitute(celisse, nikolai)\nShmooze(celisse, nikolai)\nHeliograph(nikolai, lilli)\nStormproof(nikolai)\nShmooze(nikolai, joceline)\nHeliograph(lilli, joceline)\nShmooze(lilli, joceline)\nSubstitute(joceline, lilli)\nShmooze(joceline, nikolai)\nforall x (Substitute(x, nikolai) and Substitute(x, lilli) -> Shmooze(lilli, celisse))\nforall x (Shmooze(x, celisse) and Marine(celisse) -> Stormproof(x))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, joceline) and Substitute(joceline, lilli) -> Shmooze(joceline, nikolai))\nforall x (Shmooze(x, joceline) and Irascible(joceline) -> Heliograph(x, joceline))\nforall x (Substitute(x, nikolai) -> Shmooze(nikolai, lilli))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, celisse) -> Stormproof(celisse))\nforall x (Substitute(x, lilli) and Heliograph(x, joceline) -> Marine(lilli))\nforall x (Substitute(x, lilli) -> Heliograph(x, joceline))\n\nnot Shmooze(celisse, lilli)\n\nnot Shmooze(celisse, lilli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The canada home the smith. The canada whomp the stella. The canada tuck the stella. The stella home the quillan. The stella is horrendous. The stella tuck the smith. The quillan home the smith. The quillan tuck the smith. The smith whomp the quillan. The smith tuck the stella. If someone whomp the stella and they like the quillan then the quillan tuck the canada. If someone tuck the canada and the canada is cacuminal then they are horrendous. If someone home the smith and the smith whomp the quillan then the smith tuck the stella. If someone tuck the smith and the smith is columnlike then they eat the smith. If someone whomp the stella then the stella tuck the quillan. If someone home the canada then the canada is horrendous. If someone whomp the quillan and they eat the smith then the quillan is cacuminal. If someone whomp the quillan then they eat the smith. The stella whomp the canada.", "logic": "\nHome(canada, smith)\nWhomp(canada, stella)\nTuck(canada, stella)\nHome(stella, quillan)\nHorrendous(stella)\nTuck(stella, smith)\nHome(quillan, smith)\nTuck(quillan, smith)\nWhomp(smith, quillan)\nTuck(smith, stella)\nforall x (Whomp(x, stella) and Whomp(x, quillan) -> Tuck(quillan, canada))\nforall x (Tuck(x, canada) and Cacuminal(canada) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Home(x, smith) and Whomp(smith, quillan) -> Tuck(smith, stella))\nforall x (Tuck(x, smith) and Columnlike(smith) -> Home(x, smith))\nforall x (Whomp(x, stella) -> Tuck(stella, quillan))\nforall x (Home(x, canada) -> Horrendous(canada))\nforall x (Whomp(x, quillan) and Home(x, smith) -> Cacuminal(quillan))\nforall x (Whomp(x, quillan) -> Home(x, smith))\n\nWhomp(stella, canada)\n\nWhomp(stella, canada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "The gianina mislead the dorthy. The dorthy venture the gianina. The dorthy venture the angeline. The dorthy is quadruped. The dorthy is answering. The angeline is titanic. The angeline asphalt the gianina. If something is answering then it asphalt the angeline. If something is answering then it venture the gianina. If something mislead the dorthy and the dorthy asphalt the angeline then it is answering. The dorthy venture the angeline.", "logic": "\nMislead(gianina, dorthy)\nVenture(dorthy, gianina)\nVenture(dorthy, angeline)\nQuadruped(dorthy)\nAnswering(dorthy)\nTitanic(angeline)\nAsphalt(angeline, gianina)\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Asphalt(x, angeline))\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Venture(x, gianina))\nforall x (Mislead(x, dorthy) and Asphalt(dorthy, angeline) -> Answering(x))\n\nVenture(dorthy, angeline)\n\ntherefore Venture(dorthy, angeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The sharona recover the guglielma. The guglielma cancel the sharona. The guglielma cancel the walt. The guglielma is triangular. The guglielma is officious. The walt is unstuck. The walt crispen the sharona. If something is officious then it crispen the walt. If something is officious then it cancel the sharona. If something recover the guglielma and the guglielma crispen the walt then it is officious. The walt is not unstuck.", "logic": "\nRecover(sharona, guglielma)\nCancel(guglielma, sharona)\nCancel(guglielma, walt)\nTriangular(guglielma)\nOfficious(guglielma)\nUnstuck(walt)\nCrispen(walt, sharona)\nforall x (Officious(x) -> Crispen(x, walt))\nforall x (Officious(x) -> Cancel(x, sharona))\nforall x (Recover(x, guglielma) and Crispen(guglielma, walt) -> Officious(x))\n\nnot Unstuck(walt)\n\ntherefore Unstuck(walt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The barnie gormandize the shalne. The shalne spacewalk the barnie. The shalne spacewalk the tammy. The shalne is bullocky. The shalne is chordal. The tammy is uttered. The tammy proceed the barnie. If something is chordal then it proceed the tammy. If something is chordal then it spacewalk the barnie. If something gormandize the shalne and the shalne proceed the tammy then it is chordal. The shalne proceed the tammy.", "logic": "\nGormandize(barnie, shalne)\nSpacewalk(shalne, barnie)\nSpacewalk(shalne, tammy)\nBullocky(shalne)\nChordal(shalne)\nUttered(tammy)\nProceed(tammy, barnie)\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> Proceed(x, tammy))\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> Spacewalk(x, barnie))\nforall x (Gormandize(x, shalne) and Proceed(shalne, tammy) -> Chordal(x))\n\nProceed(shalne, tammy)\n\nChordal(shalne) and forall x (Chordal(x) -> Proceed(x, tammy)) -> therefore Proceed(shalne, tammy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The rodge rouge the bernadina. The bernadina estivate the rodge. The bernadina estivate the barnabas. The bernadina is winged. The bernadina is boffo. The barnabas is every. The barnabas understand the rodge. If something is boffo then it understand the barnabas. If something is boffo then it estivate the rodge. If something rouge the bernadina and the bernadina understand the barnabas then it is boffo. The bernadina does not visit the barnabas.", "logic": "\nRouge(rodge, bernadina)\nEstivate(bernadina, rodge)\nEstivate(bernadina, barnabas)\nWinged(bernadina)\nBoffo(bernadina)\nEvery(barnabas)\nUnderstand(barnabas, rodge)\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Understand(x, barnabas))\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Estivate(x, rodge))\nforall x (Rouge(x, bernadina) and Understand(bernadina, barnabas) -> Boffo(x))\n\nnot Understand(bernadina, barnabas)\n\nBoffo(bernadina) and forall x (Boffo(x) -> Understand(x, barnabas)) -> therefore Understand(bernadina, barnabas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The charisse natter the alane. The alane scrimshank the charisse. The alane scrimshank the stephan. The alane is hoggish. The alane is noisy. The stephan is suntanned. The stephan sensualise the charisse. If something is noisy then it sensualise the stephan. If something is noisy then it scrimshank the charisse. If something natter the alane and the alane sensualise the stephan then it is noisy. The charisse is noisy.", "logic": "\nNatter(charisse, alane)\nScrimshank(alane, charisse)\nScrimshank(alane, stephan)\nHoggish(alane)\nNoisy(alane)\nSuntanned(stephan)\nSensualise(stephan, charisse)\nforall x (Noisy(x) -> Sensualise(x, stephan))\nforall x (Noisy(x) -> Scrimshank(x, charisse))\nforall x (Natter(x, alane) and Sensualise(alane, stephan) -> Noisy(x))\n\nNoisy(charisse)\n\nNoisy(alane) and forall x (Noisy(x) -> Sensualise(x, stephan)) -> therefore Sensualise(alane, stephan) Natter(charisse, alane) and Sensualise(alane, stephan) and forall x (Natter(x, alane) and Sensualise(alane, stephan) -> Noisy(x)) -> therefore Noisy(charisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The ashton fellate the anabelle. The anabelle widow the ashton. The anabelle widow the eolanda. The anabelle is prototypal. The anabelle is bareheaded. The eolanda is fooling. The eolanda overstay the ashton. If something is bareheaded then it overstay the eolanda. If something is bareheaded then it widow the ashton. If something fellate the anabelle and the anabelle overstay the eolanda then it is bareheaded. The ashton is not bareheaded.", "logic": "\nFellate(ashton, anabelle)\nWidow(anabelle, ashton)\nWidow(anabelle, eolanda)\nPrototypal(anabelle)\nBareheaded(anabelle)\nFooling(eolanda)\nOverstay(eolanda, ashton)\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) -> Overstay(x, eolanda))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) -> Widow(x, ashton))\nforall x (Fellate(x, anabelle) and Overstay(anabelle, eolanda) -> Bareheaded(x))\n\nnot Bareheaded(ashton)\n\nBareheaded(anabelle) and forall x (Bareheaded(x) -> Overstay(x, eolanda)) -> therefore Overstay(anabelle, eolanda) Fellate(ashton, anabelle) and Overstay(anabelle, eolanda) and forall x (Fellate(x, anabelle) and Overstay(anabelle, eolanda) -> Bareheaded(x)) -> therefore Bareheaded(ashton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The katee contain the fawna. The fawna circumcise the katee. The fawna circumcise the martino. The fawna is unshapely. The fawna is footloose. The martino is narial. The martino tint the katee. If something is footloose then it tint the martino. If something is footloose then it circumcise the katee. If something contain the fawna and the fawna tint the martino then it is footloose. The martino does not visit the martino.", "logic": "\nContain(katee, fawna)\nCircumcise(fawna, katee)\nCircumcise(fawna, martino)\nUnshapely(fawna)\nFootloose(fawna)\nNarial(martino)\nTint(martino, katee)\nforall x (Footloose(x) -> Tint(x, martino))\nforall x (Footloose(x) -> Circumcise(x, katee))\nforall x (Contain(x, fawna) and Tint(fawna, martino) -> Footloose(x))\n\nnot Tint(martino, martino)\n\nforall x (Footloose(x) -> Tint(x, martino)) <- forall x (Contain(x, fawna) and Tint(fawna, martino) -> Footloose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The dewey insolate the willard. The willard confute the dewey. The willard confute the ulla. The willard is loosened. The willard is sarawakian. The ulla is spare. The ulla intone the dewey. If something is sarawakian then it intone the ulla. If something is sarawakian then it confute the dewey. If something insolate the willard and the willard intone the ulla then it is sarawakian. The ulla confute the dewey.", "logic": "\nInsolate(dewey, willard)\nConfute(willard, dewey)\nConfute(willard, ulla)\nLoosened(willard)\nSarawakian(willard)\nSpare(ulla)\nIntone(ulla, dewey)\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Intone(x, ulla))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Confute(x, dewey))\nforall x (Insolate(x, willard) and Intone(willard, ulla) -> Sarawakian(x))\n\nConfute(ulla, dewey)\n\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Confute(x, dewey)) <- forall x (Insolate(x, willard) and Intone(willard, ulla) -> Sarawakian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The devondra coif the jude. The jude incite the devondra. The jude incite the see. The jude is bivariate. The jude is jumbo. The see is vinaceous. The see unspell the devondra. If something is jumbo then it unspell the see. If something is jumbo then it incite the devondra. If something coif the jude and the jude unspell the see then it is jumbo. The see is not jumbo.", "logic": "\nCoif(devondra, jude)\nIncite(jude, devondra)\nIncite(jude, see)\nBivariate(jude)\nJumbo(jude)\nVinaceous(see)\nUnspell(see, devondra)\nforall x (Jumbo(x) -> Unspell(x, see))\nforall x (Jumbo(x) -> Incite(x, devondra))\nforall x (Coif(x, jude) and Unspell(jude, see) -> Jumbo(x))\n\nnot Jumbo(see)\n\nforall x (Coif(x, jude) and Unspell(jude, see) -> Jumbo(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The dorise inosculate the milena. The milena doze the dorise. The milena doze the gussie. The milena is overaged. The milena is preserved. The gussie is stretched. The gussie dribble the dorise. If something is preserved then it dribble the gussie. If something is preserved then it doze the dorise. If something inosculate the milena and the milena dribble the gussie then it is preserved. The gussie inosculate the milena.", "logic": "\nInosculate(dorise, milena)\nDoze(milena, dorise)\nDoze(milena, gussie)\nOveraged(milena)\nPreserved(milena)\nStretched(gussie)\nDribble(gussie, dorise)\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Dribble(x, gussie))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Doze(x, dorise))\nforall x (Inosculate(x, milena) and Dribble(milena, gussie) -> Preserved(x))\n\nInosculate(gussie, milena)\n\nInosculate(gussie, milena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The dyana protect the herculie. The herculie falcon the dyana. The herculie falcon the dallas. The herculie is areal. The herculie is illative. The dallas is ceremonial. The dallas unionise the dyana. If something is illative then it unionise the dallas. If something is illative then it falcon the dyana. If something protect the herculie and the herculie unionise the dallas then it is illative. The dallas does not chase the dallas.", "logic": "\nProtect(dyana, herculie)\nFalcon(herculie, dyana)\nFalcon(herculie, dallas)\nAreal(herculie)\nIllative(herculie)\nCeremonial(dallas)\nUnionise(dallas, dyana)\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Unionise(x, dallas))\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Falcon(x, dyana))\nforall x (Protect(x, herculie) and Unionise(herculie, dallas) -> Illative(x))\n\nnot Falcon(dallas, dallas)\n\nnot Falcon(dallas, dallas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The tobiah vesiculate the sigmund. The sigmund jampack the tobiah. The sigmund jampack the pascal. The sigmund is prescient. The sigmund is aleatory. The pascal is ashen. The pascal recollect the tobiah. If something is aleatory then it recollect the pascal. If something is aleatory then it jampack the tobiah. If something vesiculate the sigmund and the sigmund recollect the pascal then it is aleatory. The tobiah is blue.", "logic": "\nVesiculate(tobiah, sigmund)\nJampack(sigmund, tobiah)\nJampack(sigmund, pascal)\nPrescient(sigmund)\nAleatory(sigmund)\nAshen(pascal)\nRecollect(pascal, tobiah)\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Recollect(x, pascal))\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Jampack(x, tobiah))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, sigmund) and Recollect(sigmund, pascal) -> Aleatory(x))\n\nBlue(tobiah)\n\nBlue(tobiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The frieda pock the cybelle. The frieda pock the anastasia. The frieda is not scraggy. The frieda offsaddle the cybelle. The frieda metal the cybelle. The frieda metal the anastasia. The cybelle pock the frieda. The cybelle is not scraggy. The cybelle is concessive. The cybelle offsaddle the anastasia. The cybelle metal the frieda. The anastasia pock the cybelle. The anastasia is concessive. The anastasia is commanding. The anastasia metal the frieda. The anastasia does not need the cybelle. If someone pock the anastasia then the anastasia is spheric. If someone pock the cybelle and they are spheric then they like the frieda. The cybelle is concessive.", "logic": "\nPock(frieda, cybelle)\nPock(frieda, anastasia)\nnot Scraggy(frieda)\nOffsaddle(frieda, cybelle)\nMetal(frieda, cybelle)\nMetal(frieda, anastasia)\nPock(cybelle, frieda)\nnot Scraggy(cybelle)\nConcessive(cybelle)\nOffsaddle(cybelle, anastasia)\nMetal(cybelle, frieda)\nPock(anastasia, cybelle)\nConcessive(anastasia)\nCommanding(anastasia)\nMetal(anastasia, frieda)\nnot Metal(anastasia, cybelle)\nforall x (Pock(x, anastasia) -> Spheric(anastasia))\nforall x (Pock(x, cybelle) and Spheric(x) -> Offsaddle(x, frieda))\n\nConcessive(cybelle)\n\ntherefore Concessive(cybelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The licha flute the mauritz. The licha flute the carmen. The licha is not bottommost. The licha oversew the mauritz. The licha bespot the mauritz. The licha bespot the carmen. The mauritz flute the licha. The mauritz is not bottommost. The mauritz is starving. The mauritz oversew the carmen. The mauritz bespot the licha. The carmen flute the mauritz. The carmen is starving. The carmen is despiteful. The carmen bespot the licha. The carmen does not need the mauritz. If someone flute the carmen then the carmen is stocked. If someone flute the mauritz and they are stocked then they like the licha. The carmen is not starving.", "logic": "\nFlute(licha, mauritz)\nFlute(licha, carmen)\nnot Bottommost(licha)\nOversew(licha, mauritz)\nBespot(licha, mauritz)\nBespot(licha, carmen)\nFlute(mauritz, licha)\nnot Bottommost(mauritz)\nStarving(mauritz)\nOversew(mauritz, carmen)\nBespot(mauritz, licha)\nFlute(carmen, mauritz)\nStarving(carmen)\nDespiteful(carmen)\nBespot(carmen, licha)\nnot Bespot(carmen, mauritz)\nforall x (Flute(x, carmen) -> Stocked(carmen))\nforall x (Flute(x, mauritz) and Stocked(x) -> Oversew(x, licha))\n\nnot Starving(carmen)\n\ntherefore Starving(carmen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The sheff peril the annamari. The sheff peril the susi. The sheff is not gobsmacked. The sheff whale the annamari. The sheff feminise the annamari. The sheff feminise the susi. The annamari peril the sheff. The annamari is not gobsmacked. The annamari is continued. The annamari whale the susi. The annamari feminise the sheff. The susi peril the annamari. The susi is continued. The susi is bulbar. The susi feminise the sheff. The susi does not need the annamari. If someone peril the susi then the susi is zoic. If someone peril the annamari and they are zoic then they like the sheff. The susi is zoic.", "logic": "\nPeril(sheff, annamari)\nPeril(sheff, susi)\nnot Gobsmacked(sheff)\nWhale(sheff, annamari)\nFeminise(sheff, annamari)\nFeminise(sheff, susi)\nPeril(annamari, sheff)\nnot Gobsmacked(annamari)\nContinued(annamari)\nWhale(annamari, susi)\nFeminise(annamari, sheff)\nPeril(susi, annamari)\nContinued(susi)\nBulbar(susi)\nFeminise(susi, sheff)\nnot Feminise(susi, annamari)\nforall x (Peril(x, susi) -> Zoic(susi))\nforall x (Peril(x, annamari) and Zoic(x) -> Whale(x, sheff))\n\nZoic(susi)\n\nPeril(sheff, susi) and forall x (Peril(x, susi) -> Zoic(susi)) -> therefore Zoic(susi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The johnette boil the melania. The johnette boil the dion. The johnette is not dilute. The johnette melodise the melania. The johnette bobble the melania. The johnette bobble the dion. The melania boil the johnette. The melania is not dilute. The melania is shorn. The melania melodise the dion. The melania bobble the johnette. The dion boil the melania. The dion is shorn. The dion is mandatory. The dion bobble the johnette. The dion does not need the melania. If someone boil the dion then the dion is reductive. If someone boil the melania and they are reductive then they like the johnette. The dion is not reductive.", "logic": "\nBoil(johnette, melania)\nBoil(johnette, dion)\nnot Dilute(johnette)\nMelodise(johnette, melania)\nBobble(johnette, melania)\nBobble(johnette, dion)\nBoil(melania, johnette)\nnot Dilute(melania)\nShorn(melania)\nMelodise(melania, dion)\nBobble(melania, johnette)\nBoil(dion, melania)\nShorn(dion)\nMandatory(dion)\nBobble(dion, johnette)\nnot Bobble(dion, melania)\nforall x (Boil(x, dion) -> Reductive(dion))\nforall x (Boil(x, melania) and Reductive(x) -> Melodise(x, johnette))\n\nnot Reductive(dion)\n\nBoil(johnette, dion) and forall x (Boil(x, dion) -> Reductive(dion)) -> therefore Reductive(dion)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The woodie retry the peter. The woodie retry the farand. The woodie is not uvular. The woodie sail the peter. The woodie winter the peter. The woodie winter the farand. The peter retry the woodie. The peter is not uvular. The peter is posed. The peter sail the farand. The peter winter the woodie. The farand retry the peter. The farand is posed. The farand is triangular. The farand winter the woodie. The farand does not need the peter. If someone retry the farand then the farand is drear. If someone retry the peter and they are drear then they like the woodie. The farand sail the woodie.", "logic": "\nRetry(woodie, peter)\nRetry(woodie, farand)\nnot Uvular(woodie)\nSail(woodie, peter)\nWinter(woodie, peter)\nWinter(woodie, farand)\nRetry(peter, woodie)\nnot Uvular(peter)\nPosed(peter)\nSail(peter, farand)\nWinter(peter, woodie)\nRetry(farand, peter)\nPosed(farand)\nTriangular(farand)\nWinter(farand, woodie)\nnot Winter(farand, peter)\nforall x (Retry(x, farand) -> Drear(farand))\nforall x (Retry(x, peter) and Drear(x) -> Sail(x, woodie))\n\nSail(farand, woodie)\n\nRetry(woodie, farand) and forall x (Retry(x, farand) -> Drear(farand)) -> therefore Drear(farand) Retry(farand, peter) and Drear(farand) and forall x (Retry(x, peter) and Drear(x) -> Sail(x, woodie)) -> therefore Sail(farand, woodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The doe fraternize the thibaud. The doe fraternize the alleen. The doe is not peculiar. The doe refer the thibaud. The doe declare the thibaud. The doe declare the alleen. The thibaud fraternize the doe. The thibaud is not peculiar. The thibaud is oncoming. The thibaud refer the alleen. The thibaud declare the doe. The alleen fraternize the thibaud. The alleen is oncoming. The alleen is paperback. The alleen declare the doe. The alleen does not need the thibaud. If someone fraternize the alleen then the alleen is refractory. If someone fraternize the thibaud and they are refractory then they like the doe. The alleen does not like the doe.", "logic": "\nFraternize(doe, thibaud)\nFraternize(doe, alleen)\nnot Peculiar(doe)\nRefer(doe, thibaud)\nDeclare(doe, thibaud)\nDeclare(doe, alleen)\nFraternize(thibaud, doe)\nnot Peculiar(thibaud)\nOncoming(thibaud)\nRefer(thibaud, alleen)\nDeclare(thibaud, doe)\nFraternize(alleen, thibaud)\nOncoming(alleen)\nPaperback(alleen)\nDeclare(alleen, doe)\nnot Declare(alleen, thibaud)\nforall x (Fraternize(x, alleen) -> Refractory(alleen))\nforall x (Fraternize(x, thibaud) and Refractory(x) -> Refer(x, doe))\n\nnot Refer(alleen, doe)\n\nFraternize(doe, alleen) and forall x (Fraternize(x, alleen) -> Refractory(alleen)) -> therefore Refractory(alleen) Fraternize(alleen, thibaud) and Refractory(alleen) and forall x (Fraternize(x, thibaud) and Refractory(x) -> Refer(x, doe)) -> therefore Refer(alleen, doe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The leonidas snack the miran. The leonidas snack the sawyere. The leonidas is not scaly. The leonidas cloy the miran. The leonidas fall the miran. The leonidas fall the sawyere. The miran snack the leonidas. The miran is not scaly. The miran is maimed. The miran cloy the sawyere. The miran fall the leonidas. The sawyere snack the miran. The sawyere is maimed. The sawyere is opposable. The sawyere fall the leonidas. The sawyere does not need the miran. If someone snack the sawyere then the sawyere is goethian. If someone snack the miran and they are goethian then they like the leonidas. The miran does not like the leonidas.", "logic": "\nSnack(leonidas, miran)\nSnack(leonidas, sawyere)\nnot Scaly(leonidas)\nCloy(leonidas, miran)\nFall(leonidas, miran)\nFall(leonidas, sawyere)\nSnack(miran, leonidas)\nnot Scaly(miran)\nMaimed(miran)\nCloy(miran, sawyere)\nFall(miran, leonidas)\nSnack(sawyere, miran)\nMaimed(sawyere)\nOpposable(sawyere)\nFall(sawyere, leonidas)\nnot Fall(sawyere, miran)\nforall x (Snack(x, sawyere) -> Goethian(sawyere))\nforall x (Snack(x, miran) and Goethian(x) -> Cloy(x, leonidas))\n\nnot Cloy(miran, leonidas)\n\nforall x (Snack(x, miran) and Goethian(x) -> Cloy(x, leonidas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The fran skirt the ranique. The fran skirt the terrance. The fran is not doting. The fran trivialise the ranique. The fran abstain the ranique. The fran abstain the terrance. The ranique skirt the fran. The ranique is not doting. The ranique is bragging. The ranique trivialise the terrance. The ranique abstain the fran. The terrance skirt the ranique. The terrance is bragging. The terrance is hawkish. The terrance abstain the fran. The terrance does not need the ranique. If someone skirt the terrance then the terrance is congruent. If someone skirt the ranique and they are congruent then they like the fran. The fran trivialise the fran.", "logic": "\nSkirt(fran, ranique)\nSkirt(fran, terrance)\nnot Doting(fran)\nTrivialise(fran, ranique)\nAbstain(fran, ranique)\nAbstain(fran, terrance)\nSkirt(ranique, fran)\nnot Doting(ranique)\nBragging(ranique)\nTrivialise(ranique, terrance)\nAbstain(ranique, fran)\nSkirt(terrance, ranique)\nBragging(terrance)\nHawkish(terrance)\nAbstain(terrance, fran)\nnot Abstain(terrance, ranique)\nforall x (Skirt(x, terrance) -> Congruent(terrance))\nforall x (Skirt(x, ranique) and Congruent(x) -> Trivialise(x, fran))\n\nTrivialise(fran, fran)\n\nforall x (Skirt(x, ranique) and Congruent(x) -> Trivialise(x, fran)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The cobb drape the aubine. The cobb drape the arabele. The cobb is not unaired. The cobb cranch the aubine. The cobb warp the aubine. The cobb warp the arabele. The aubine drape the cobb. The aubine is not unaired. The aubine is nonionized. The aubine cranch the arabele. The aubine warp the cobb. The arabele drape the aubine. The arabele is nonionized. The arabele is louvered. The arabele warp the cobb. The arabele does not need the aubine. If someone drape the arabele then the arabele is obnoxious. If someone drape the aubine and they are obnoxious then they like the cobb. The aubine is not obnoxious.", "logic": "\nDrape(cobb, aubine)\nDrape(cobb, arabele)\nnot Unaired(cobb)\nCranch(cobb, aubine)\nWarp(cobb, aubine)\nWarp(cobb, arabele)\nDrape(aubine, cobb)\nnot Unaired(aubine)\nNonionized(aubine)\nCranch(aubine, arabele)\nWarp(aubine, cobb)\nDrape(arabele, aubine)\nNonionized(arabele)\nLouvered(arabele)\nWarp(arabele, cobb)\nnot Warp(arabele, aubine)\nforall x (Drape(x, arabele) -> Obnoxious(arabele))\nforall x (Drape(x, aubine) and Obnoxious(x) -> Cranch(x, cobb))\n\nnot Obnoxious(aubine)\n\nnot Obnoxious(aubine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The barbie miff the fleurette. The barbie miff the karsten. The barbie is not felonious. The barbie lord the fleurette. The barbie retie the fleurette. The barbie retie the karsten. The fleurette miff the barbie. The fleurette is not felonious. The fleurette is velvet. The fleurette lord the karsten. The fleurette retie the barbie. The karsten miff the fleurette. The karsten is velvet. The karsten is depressing. The karsten retie the barbie. The karsten does not need the fleurette. If someone miff the karsten then the karsten is tracked. If someone miff the fleurette and they are tracked then they like the barbie. The barbie is rough.", "logic": "\nMiff(barbie, fleurette)\nMiff(barbie, karsten)\nnot Felonious(barbie)\nLord(barbie, fleurette)\nRetie(barbie, fleurette)\nRetie(barbie, karsten)\nMiff(fleurette, barbie)\nnot Felonious(fleurette)\nVelvet(fleurette)\nLord(fleurette, karsten)\nRetie(fleurette, barbie)\nMiff(karsten, fleurette)\nVelvet(karsten)\nDepressing(karsten)\nRetie(karsten, barbie)\nnot Retie(karsten, fleurette)\nforall x (Miff(x, karsten) -> Tracked(karsten))\nforall x (Miff(x, fleurette) and Tracked(x) -> Lord(x, barbie))\n\nRough(barbie)\n\nRough(barbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The riva glint the lilia. The riva glint the herbert. The riva is not pictorial. The riva bungle the lilia. The riva deionize the lilia. The riva deionize the herbert. The lilia glint the riva. The lilia is not pictorial. The lilia is saintlike. The lilia bungle the herbert. The lilia deionize the riva. The herbert glint the lilia. The herbert is saintlike. The herbert is marvellous. The herbert deionize the riva. The herbert does not need the lilia. If someone glint the herbert then the herbert is wrenching. If someone glint the lilia and they are wrenching then they like the riva. The lilia does not chase the lilia.", "logic": "\nGlint(riva, lilia)\nGlint(riva, herbert)\nnot Pictorial(riva)\nBungle(riva, lilia)\nDeionize(riva, lilia)\nDeionize(riva, herbert)\nGlint(lilia, riva)\nnot Pictorial(lilia)\nSaintlike(lilia)\nBungle(lilia, herbert)\nDeionize(lilia, riva)\nGlint(herbert, lilia)\nSaintlike(herbert)\nMarvellous(herbert)\nDeionize(herbert, riva)\nnot Deionize(herbert, lilia)\nforall x (Glint(x, herbert) -> Wrenching(herbert))\nforall x (Glint(x, lilia) and Wrenching(x) -> Bungle(x, riva))\n\nnot Glint(lilia, lilia)\n\nnot Glint(lilia, lilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "The janelle commove the larina. The janelle commove the mick. The janelle is not omissive. The janelle bash the larina. The janelle reorganize the larina. The janelle reorganize the mick. The larina commove the janelle. The larina is not omissive. The larina is symbiotic. The larina bash the mick. The larina reorganize the janelle. The mick commove the larina. The mick is symbiotic. The mick is particular. The mick reorganize the janelle. The mick does not need the larina. If someone commove the mick then the mick is unimproved. If someone commove the larina and they are unimproved then they like the janelle. The janelle reorganize the janelle.", "logic": "\nCommove(janelle, larina)\nCommove(janelle, mick)\nnot Omissive(janelle)\nBash(janelle, larina)\nReorganize(janelle, larina)\nReorganize(janelle, mick)\nCommove(larina, janelle)\nnot Omissive(larina)\nSymbiotic(larina)\nBash(larina, mick)\nReorganize(larina, janelle)\nCommove(mick, larina)\nSymbiotic(mick)\nParticular(mick)\nReorganize(mick, janelle)\nnot Reorganize(mick, larina)\nforall x (Commove(x, mick) -> Unimproved(mick))\nforall x (Commove(x, larina) and Unimproved(x) -> Bash(x, janelle))\n\nReorganize(janelle, janelle)\n\nReorganize(janelle, janelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-765"} {"premises": "Ruthi is melancholy. Janean is revertible. Janean is semite. If something is melancholy then it is semite. If something is revertible then it is respondent. Big things are seminude. Janean is semite.", "logic": "\nMelancholy(ruthi)\nRevertible(janean)\nSemite(janean)\nforall x (Melancholy(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Revertible(x) -> Respondent(x))\nforall x (Respondent(x) -> Seminude(x))\n\nSemite(janean)\n\ntherefore Semite(janean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Alford is coordinate. Gilberto is dowerless. Gilberto is oily. If something is coordinate then it is oily. If something is dowerless then it is neonatal. Big things are unremarked. Gilberto is not dowerless.", "logic": "\nCoordinate(alford)\nDowerless(gilberto)\nOily(gilberto)\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Oily(x))\nforall x (Dowerless(x) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Unremarked(x))\n\nnot Dowerless(gilberto)\n\ntherefore Dowerless(gilberto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Effie is sinuous. Dorthea is amoeban. Dorthea is omissible. If something is sinuous then it is omissible. If something is amoeban then it is fleet. Big things are bacterioid. Dorthea is fleet.", "logic": "\nSinuous(effie)\nAmoeban(dorthea)\nOmissible(dorthea)\nforall x (Sinuous(x) -> Omissible(x))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) -> Fleet(x))\nforall x (Fleet(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\n\nFleet(dorthea)\n\nAmoeban(dorthea) and forall x (Amoeban(x) -> Fleet(x)) -> therefore Fleet(dorthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Niles is meet. Melamie is ocular. Melamie is cheerless. If something is meet then it is cheerless. If something is ocular then it is dirty. Big things are normal. Niles is not cheerless.", "logic": "\nMeet(niles)\nOcular(melamie)\nCheerless(melamie)\nforall x (Meet(x) -> Cheerless(x))\nforall x (Ocular(x) -> Dirty(x))\nforall x (Dirty(x) -> Normal(x))\n\nnot Cheerless(niles)\n\nMeet(niles) and forall x (Meet(x) -> Cheerless(x)) -> therefore Cheerless(niles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Dennis is reddish. Zebadiah is jittery. Zebadiah is cadaverous. If something is reddish then it is cadaverous. If something is jittery then it is egocentric. Big things are mirthful. Zebadiah is mirthful.", "logic": "\nReddish(dennis)\nJittery(zebadiah)\nCadaverous(zebadiah)\nforall x (Reddish(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Jittery(x) -> Egocentric(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) -> Mirthful(x))\n\nMirthful(zebadiah)\n\nJittery(zebadiah) and forall x (Jittery(x) -> Egocentric(x)) -> therefore Egocentric(zebadiah) Egocentric(zebadiah) and forall x (Egocentric(x) -> Mirthful(x)) -> therefore Mirthful(zebadiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Cathyleen is somali. Arther is scaly. Arther is depilous. If something is somali then it is depilous. If something is scaly then it is hypodermal. Big things are sprawly. Arther is not sprawly.", "logic": "\nSomali(cathyleen)\nScaly(arther)\nDepilous(arther)\nforall x (Somali(x) -> Depilous(x))\nforall x (Scaly(x) -> Hypodermal(x))\nforall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Sprawly(x))\n\nnot Sprawly(arther)\n\nScaly(arther) and forall x (Scaly(x) -> Hypodermal(x)) -> therefore Hypodermal(arther) Hypodermal(arther) and forall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Sprawly(x)) -> therefore Sprawly(arther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Nelle is supportive. Sabrina is timeworn. Sabrina is blooming. If something is supportive then it is blooming. If something is timeworn then it is spiny. Big things are basifixed. Nelle is not spiny.", "logic": "\nSupportive(nelle)\nTimeworn(sabrina)\nBlooming(sabrina)\nforall x (Supportive(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Timeworn(x) -> Spiny(x))\nforall x (Spiny(x) -> Basifixed(x))\n\nnot Spiny(nelle)\n\nforall x (Timeworn(x) -> Spiny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Rochell is unlimited. Brenda is orthodox. Brenda is countless. If something is unlimited then it is countless. If something is orthodox then it is isometric. Big things are bourgeois. Rochell is bourgeois.", "logic": "\nUnlimited(rochell)\nOrthodox(brenda)\nCountless(brenda)\nforall x (Unlimited(x) -> Countless(x))\nforall x (Orthodox(x) -> Isometric(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Bourgeois(x))\n\nBourgeois(rochell)\n\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Bourgeois(x)) <- forall x (Orthodox(x) -> Isometric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Lenka is optimal. Orren is straw. Orren is influent. If something is optimal then it is influent. If something is straw then it is mesmerized. Big things are motorless. Lenka is not straw.", "logic": "\nOptimal(lenka)\nStraw(orren)\nInfluent(orren)\nforall x (Optimal(x) -> Influent(x))\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Mesmerized(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) -> Motorless(x))\n\nnot Straw(lenka)\n\nnot Straw(lenka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Ardenia is behavioral. Josee is verrucose. Josee is straight. If something is behavioral then it is straight. If something is verrucose then it is adaptive. Big things are counter. Ardenia is round.", "logic": "\nBehavioral(ardenia)\nVerrucose(josee)\nStraight(josee)\nforall x (Behavioral(x) -> Straight(x))\nforall x (Verrucose(x) -> Adaptive(x))\nforall x (Adaptive(x) -> Counter(x))\n\nRound(ardenia)\n\nRound(ardenia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Yanaton is blooded. Iggy is biannual. Iggy is guttural. If something is blooded then it is guttural. If something is biannual then it is atheist. Big things are imitation. Iggy is not cold.", "logic": "\nBlooded(yanaton)\nBiannual(iggy)\nGuttural(iggy)\nforall x (Blooded(x) -> Guttural(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) -> Atheist(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Imitation(x))\n\nnot Cold(iggy)\n\nnot Cold(iggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "Kelsey is faceless. Agnes is mortifying. Agnes is unmarred. If something is faceless then it is unmarred. If something is mortifying then it is rimy. Big things are lancelike. Kelsey is cold.", "logic": "\nFaceless(kelsey)\nMortifying(agnes)\nUnmarred(agnes)\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Unmarred(x))\nforall x (Mortifying(x) -> Rimy(x))\nforall x (Rimy(x) -> Lancelike(x))\n\nCold(kelsey)\n\nCold(kelsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1032"} {"premises": "The kalli is farseeing. If something is farseeing then it is nautical. All nautical things are transitory. Kind things are farseeing. The kalli is farseeing.", "logic": "\nFarseeing(kalli)\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Nautical(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Crackle(x) -> Farseeing(x))\n\nFarseeing(kalli)\n\ntherefore Farseeing(kalli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The willi is nonpareil. If something is nonpareil then it is homeric. All homeric things are caecilian. Kind things are nonpareil. The willi is not nonpareil.", "logic": "\nNonpareil(willi)\nforall x (Nonpareil(x) -> Homeric(x))\nforall x (Homeric(x) -> Caecilian(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) -> Nonpareil(x))\n\nnot Nonpareil(willi)\n\ntherefore Nonpareil(willi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The janeen is priceless. If something is priceless then it is dyspneal. All dyspneal things are riskless. Kind things are priceless. The janeen is dyspneal.", "logic": "\nPriceless(janeen)\nforall x (Priceless(x) -> Dyspneal(x))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Priceless(x))\n\nDyspneal(janeen)\n\nPriceless(janeen) and forall x (Priceless(x) -> Dyspneal(x)) -> therefore Dyspneal(janeen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The leisha is frivolous. If something is frivolous then it is ramate. All ramate things are snide. Kind things are frivolous. The leisha is not ramate.", "logic": "\nFrivolous(leisha)\nforall x (Frivolous(x) -> Ramate(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> Snide(x))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> Frivolous(x))\n\nnot Ramate(leisha)\n\nFrivolous(leisha) and forall x (Frivolous(x) -> Ramate(x)) -> therefore Ramate(leisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The stormi is barbarous. If something is barbarous then it is afrikaner. All afrikaner things are offsides. Kind things are barbarous. The stormi is offsides.", "logic": "\nBarbarous(stormi)\nforall x (Barbarous(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Afrikaner(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> Barbarous(x))\n\nOffsides(stormi)\n\nBarbarous(stormi) and forall x (Barbarous(x) -> Afrikaner(x)) -> therefore Afrikaner(stormi) Afrikaner(stormi) and forall x (Afrikaner(x) -> Offsides(x)) -> therefore Offsides(stormi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The jeanna is unmovable. If something is unmovable then it is unflurried. All unflurried things are pampering. Kind things are unmovable. The jeanna is not pampering.", "logic": "\nUnmovable(jeanna)\nforall x (Unmovable(x) -> Unflurried(x))\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Pampering(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Unmovable(x))\n\nnot Pampering(jeanna)\n\nUnmovable(jeanna) and forall x (Unmovable(x) -> Unflurried(x)) -> therefore Unflurried(jeanna) Unflurried(jeanna) and forall x (Unflurried(x) -> Pampering(x)) -> therefore Pampering(jeanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The kaila is perforated. If something is perforated then it is scots. All scots things are dualistic. Kind things are perforated. The kaila is not genteel.", "logic": "\nPerforated(kaila)\nforall x (Perforated(x) -> Scots(x))\nforall x (Scots(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Genteel(x) -> Perforated(x))\n\nnot Genteel(kaila)\n\nnot Genteel(kaila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The rodney is multiplied. If something is multiplied then it is labeled. All labeled things are stealthy. Kind things are multiplied. The rodney chases the rodney.", "logic": "\nMultiplied(rodney)\nforall x (Multiplied(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) -> Multiplied(x))\n\nChases(rodney, rodney)\n\nChases(rodney, rodney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The hamish is nipponese. If something is nipponese then it is cautious. All cautious things are live. Kind things are nipponese. The hamish does not need the hamish.", "logic": "\nNipponese(hamish)\nforall x (Nipponese(x) -> Cautious(x))\nforall x (Cautious(x) -> Live(x))\nforall x (Baptismal(x) -> Nipponese(x))\n\nnot Needs(hamish, hamish)\n\nnot Needs(hamish, hamish) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The alicea is wesleyan. If something is wesleyan then it is perturbing. All perturbing things are myocardial. Kind things are wesleyan. The alicea sees the alicea.", "logic": "\nWesleyan(alicea)\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) -> Myocardial(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Wesleyan(x))\n\nSees(alicea, alicea)\n\nSees(alicea, alicea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-638"} {"premises": "The danit is thunderous. If someone is thunderous then they are mouselike. All mouselike people are not hemophilic. The danit is thunderous.", "logic": "\nThunderous(danit)\nforall x (Thunderous(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> not Hemophilic(x))\n\nThunderous(danit)\n\ntherefore Thunderous(danit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The corene is crowning. If someone is crowning then they are covetous. All covetous people are not agitated. The corene is not crowning.", "logic": "\nCrowning(corene)\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Covetous(x))\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> not Agitated(x))\n\nnot Crowning(corene)\n\ntherefore Crowning(corene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The orelie is dissenting. If someone is dissenting then they are sizzling. All sizzling people are not premedical. The orelie is sizzling.", "logic": "\nDissenting(orelie)\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Sizzling(x))\nforall x (Sizzling(x) -> not Premedical(x))\n\nSizzling(orelie)\n\nDissenting(orelie) and forall x (Dissenting(x) -> Sizzling(x)) -> therefore Sizzling(orelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The niall is bust. If someone is bust then they are irrelevant. All irrelevant people are not manque. The niall is not irrelevant.", "logic": "\nBust(niall)\nforall x (Bust(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) -> not Manque(x))\n\nnot Irrelevant(niall)\n\nBust(niall) and forall x (Bust(x) -> Irrelevant(x)) -> therefore Irrelevant(niall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The richie is dominating. If someone is dominating then they are sandaled. All sandaled people are not catalytic. The richie is not catalytic.", "logic": "\nDominating(richie)\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Sandaled(x))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) -> not Catalytic(x))\n\nnot Catalytic(richie)\n\nDominating(richie) and forall x (Dominating(x) -> Sandaled(x)) -> therefore Sandaled(richie) Sandaled(richie) and forall x (Sandaled(x) -> not Catalytic(x)) -> therefore not Catalytic(richie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The wyatan is motivating. If someone is motivating then they are oppressive. All oppressive people are not ballistic. The wyatan is ballistic.", "logic": "\nMotivating(wyatan)\nforall x (Motivating(x) -> Oppressive(x))\nforall x (Oppressive(x) -> not Ballistic(x))\n\nBallistic(wyatan)\n\nMotivating(wyatan) and forall x (Motivating(x) -> Oppressive(x)) -> therefore Oppressive(wyatan) Oppressive(wyatan) and forall x (Oppressive(x) -> not Ballistic(x)) -> therefore not Ballistic(wyatan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The edgar is eerie. If someone is eerie then they are uricosuric. All uricosuric people are not apomictic. The edgar is not red.", "logic": "\nEerie(edgar)\nforall x (Eerie(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> not Apomictic(x))\n\nnot Red(edgar)\n\nnot Red(edgar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The lorrayne is verminous. If someone is verminous then they are unripened. All unripened people are not titular. The lorrayne needs the lorrayne.", "logic": "\nVerminous(lorrayne)\nforall x (Verminous(x) -> Unripened(x))\nforall x (Unripened(x) -> not Titular(x))\n\nNeeds(lorrayne, lorrayne)\n\nNeeds(lorrayne, lorrayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The lauree is terminated. If someone is terminated then they are congealed. All congealed people are not tuscan. The lauree does not eat the lauree.", "logic": "\nTerminated(lauree)\nforall x (Terminated(x) -> Congealed(x))\nforall x (Congealed(x) -> not Tuscan(x))\n\nnot Eats(lauree, lauree)\n\nnot Eats(lauree, lauree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The sylvan is covered. If someone is covered then they are atrophied. All atrophied people are not shelflike. The sylvan sees the sylvan.", "logic": "\nCovered(sylvan)\nforall x (Covered(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> not Shelflike(x))\n\nSees(sylvan, sylvan)\n\nSees(sylvan, sylvan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-662"} {"premises": "The colline overfly the corenda. The colline overfly the wye. The colline is petalled. The corenda overfly the julianna. The wye palpitate the colline. The wye overfly the corenda. The julianna overfly the corenda. If someone overfly the wye then the wye palpitate the corenda. If someone palpitate the corenda then they are fighting. The wye overfly the corenda.", "logic": "\nOverfly(colline, corenda)\nOverfly(colline, wye)\nPetalled(colline)\nOverfly(corenda, julianna)\nPalpitate(wye, colline)\nOverfly(wye, corenda)\nOverfly(julianna, corenda)\nforall x (Overfly(x, wye) -> Palpitate(wye, corenda))\nforall x (Palpitate(x, corenda) -> Fighting(x))\n\nOverfly(wye, corenda)\n\ntherefore Overfly(wye, corenda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The donica agnise the carl. The donica agnise the romonda. The donica is chorionic. The carl agnise the rahul. The romonda bilge the donica. The romonda agnise the carl. The rahul agnise the carl. If someone agnise the romonda then the romonda bilge the carl. If someone bilge the carl then they are wainscoted. The donica does not eat the romonda.", "logic": "\nAgnise(donica, carl)\nAgnise(donica, romonda)\nChorionic(donica)\nAgnise(carl, rahul)\nBilge(romonda, donica)\nAgnise(romonda, carl)\nAgnise(rahul, carl)\nforall x (Agnise(x, romonda) -> Bilge(romonda, carl))\nforall x (Bilge(x, carl) -> Wainscoted(x))\n\nnot Agnise(donica, romonda)\n\ntherefore Agnise(donica, romonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The chancey abduce the marrilee. The chancey abduce the nanny. The chancey is barbed. The marrilee abduce the bobina. The nanny uncoil the chancey. The nanny abduce the marrilee. The bobina abduce the marrilee. If someone abduce the nanny then the nanny uncoil the marrilee. If someone uncoil the marrilee then they are albitic. The nanny uncoil the marrilee.", "logic": "\nAbduce(chancey, marrilee)\nAbduce(chancey, nanny)\nBarbed(chancey)\nAbduce(marrilee, bobina)\nUncoil(nanny, chancey)\nAbduce(nanny, marrilee)\nAbduce(bobina, marrilee)\nforall x (Abduce(x, nanny) -> Uncoil(nanny, marrilee))\nforall x (Uncoil(x, marrilee) -> Albitic(x))\n\nUncoil(nanny, marrilee)\n\nAbduce(chancey, nanny) and forall x (Abduce(x, nanny) -> Uncoil(nanny, marrilee)) -> therefore Uncoil(nanny, marrilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The kalman flap the chicky. The kalman flap the eleonora. The kalman is bolshevist. The chicky flap the lana. The eleonora expire the kalman. The eleonora flap the chicky. The lana flap the chicky. If someone flap the eleonora then the eleonora expire the chicky. If someone expire the chicky then they are loony. The eleonora does not chase the chicky.", "logic": "\nFlap(kalman, chicky)\nFlap(kalman, eleonora)\nBolshevist(kalman)\nFlap(chicky, lana)\nExpire(eleonora, kalman)\nFlap(eleonora, chicky)\nFlap(lana, chicky)\nforall x (Flap(x, eleonora) -> Expire(eleonora, chicky))\nforall x (Expire(x, chicky) -> Loony(x))\n\nnot Expire(eleonora, chicky)\n\nFlap(kalman, eleonora) and forall x (Flap(x, eleonora) -> Expire(eleonora, chicky)) -> therefore Expire(eleonora, chicky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The tatum overstate the oneida. The tatum overstate the eugine. The tatum is overgrown. The oneida overstate the rabi. The eugine grease the tatum. The eugine overstate the oneida. The rabi overstate the oneida. If someone overstate the eugine then the eugine grease the oneida. If someone grease the oneida then they are ramous. The eugine is ramous.", "logic": "\nOverstate(tatum, oneida)\nOverstate(tatum, eugine)\nOvergrown(tatum)\nOverstate(oneida, rabi)\nGrease(eugine, tatum)\nOverstate(eugine, oneida)\nOverstate(rabi, oneida)\nforall x (Overstate(x, eugine) -> Grease(eugine, oneida))\nforall x (Grease(x, oneida) -> Ramous(x))\n\nRamous(eugine)\n\nOverstate(tatum, eugine) and forall x (Overstate(x, eugine) -> Grease(eugine, oneida)) -> therefore Grease(eugine, oneida) Grease(eugine, oneida) and forall x (Grease(x, oneida) -> Ramous(x)) -> therefore Ramous(eugine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The torrin terrace the jeffery. The torrin terrace the helli. The torrin is hermitic. The jeffery terrace the dwight. The helli swell the torrin. The helli terrace the jeffery. The dwight terrace the jeffery. If someone terrace the helli then the helli swell the jeffery. If someone swell the jeffery then they are flavourful. The helli is not flavourful.", "logic": "\nTerrace(torrin, jeffery)\nTerrace(torrin, helli)\nHermitic(torrin)\nTerrace(jeffery, dwight)\nSwell(helli, torrin)\nTerrace(helli, jeffery)\nTerrace(dwight, jeffery)\nforall x (Terrace(x, helli) -> Swell(helli, jeffery))\nforall x (Swell(x, jeffery) -> Flavourful(x))\n\nnot Flavourful(helli)\n\nTerrace(torrin, helli) and forall x (Terrace(x, helli) -> Swell(helli, jeffery)) -> therefore Swell(helli, jeffery) Swell(helli, jeffery) and forall x (Swell(x, jeffery) -> Flavourful(x)) -> therefore Flavourful(helli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The mikey romanise the traver. The mikey romanise the gui. The mikey is priggish. The traver romanise the joni. The gui port the mikey. The gui romanise the traver. The joni romanise the traver. If someone romanise the gui then the gui port the traver. If someone port the traver then they are ramose. The traver is not ramose.", "logic": "\nRomanise(mikey, traver)\nRomanise(mikey, gui)\nPriggish(mikey)\nRomanise(traver, joni)\nPort(gui, mikey)\nRomanise(gui, traver)\nRomanise(joni, traver)\nforall x (Romanise(x, gui) -> Port(gui, traver))\nforall x (Port(x, traver) -> Ramose(x))\n\nnot Ramose(traver)\n\nforall x (Port(x, traver) -> Ramose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The hynda misjudge the rozalie. The hynda misjudge the orelle. The hynda is satiable. The rozalie misjudge the nonah. The orelle latinize the hynda. The orelle misjudge the rozalie. The nonah misjudge the rozalie. If someone misjudge the orelle then the orelle latinize the rozalie. If someone latinize the rozalie then they are magnetic. The nonah is magnetic.", "logic": "\nMisjudge(hynda, rozalie)\nMisjudge(hynda, orelle)\nSatiable(hynda)\nMisjudge(rozalie, nonah)\nLatinize(orelle, hynda)\nMisjudge(orelle, rozalie)\nMisjudge(nonah, rozalie)\nforall x (Misjudge(x, orelle) -> Latinize(orelle, rozalie))\nforall x (Latinize(x, rozalie) -> Magnetic(x))\n\nMagnetic(nonah)\n\nforall x (Latinize(x, rozalie) -> Magnetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The marsha quintuple the fredi. The marsha quintuple the fonzie. The marsha is salmon. The fredi quintuple the beatriz. The fonzie bespot the marsha. The fonzie quintuple the fredi. The beatriz quintuple the fredi. If someone quintuple the fonzie then the fonzie bespot the fredi. If someone bespot the fredi then they are waxed. The marsha is not waxed.", "logic": "\nQuintuple(marsha, fredi)\nQuintuple(marsha, fonzie)\nSalmon(marsha)\nQuintuple(fredi, beatriz)\nBespot(fonzie, marsha)\nQuintuple(fonzie, fredi)\nQuintuple(beatriz, fredi)\nforall x (Quintuple(x, fonzie) -> Bespot(fonzie, fredi))\nforall x (Bespot(x, fredi) -> Waxed(x))\n\nnot Waxed(marsha)\n\nforall x (Bespot(x, fredi) -> Waxed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The hewe reseal the herold. The hewe reseal the olwen. The hewe is plumose. The herold reseal the wynn. The olwen book the hewe. The olwen reseal the herold. The wynn reseal the herold. If someone reseal the olwen then the olwen book the herold. If someone book the herold then they are nonracist. The hewe is rough.", "logic": "\nReseal(hewe, herold)\nReseal(hewe, olwen)\nPlumose(hewe)\nReseal(herold, wynn)\nBook(olwen, hewe)\nReseal(olwen, herold)\nReseal(wynn, herold)\nforall x (Reseal(x, olwen) -> Book(olwen, herold))\nforall x (Book(x, herold) -> Nonracist(x))\n\nRough(hewe)\n\nRough(hewe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The ettie stray the riki. The ettie stray the sari. The ettie is dopey. The riki stray the dickey. The sari equalise the ettie. The sari stray the riki. The dickey stray the riki. If someone stray the sari then the sari equalise the riki. If someone equalise the riki then they are useable. The riki does not like the ettie.", "logic": "\nStray(ettie, riki)\nStray(ettie, sari)\nDopey(ettie)\nStray(riki, dickey)\nEqualise(sari, ettie)\nStray(sari, riki)\nStray(dickey, riki)\nforall x (Stray(x, sari) -> Equalise(sari, riki))\nforall x (Equalise(x, riki) -> Useable(x))\n\nnot Likes(riki, ettie)\n\nnot Likes(riki, ettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The parke summit the cordey. The parke summit the barth. The parke is outright. The cordey summit the britni. The barth aggrandise the parke. The barth summit the cordey. The britni summit the cordey. If someone summit the barth then the barth aggrandise the cordey. If someone aggrandise the cordey then they are unabashed. The barth is outright.", "logic": "\nSummit(parke, cordey)\nSummit(parke, barth)\nOutright(parke)\nSummit(cordey, britni)\nAggrandise(barth, parke)\nSummit(barth, cordey)\nSummit(britni, cordey)\nforall x (Summit(x, barth) -> Aggrandise(barth, cordey))\nforall x (Aggrandise(x, cordey) -> Unabashed(x))\n\nOutright(barth)\n\nOutright(barth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1019"} {"premises": "The dayle is maidenlike. The thorstein wander the dayle. The thorstein is sizzling. If someone vituperate the dayle and the dayle vituperate the thorstein then the thorstein vituperate the dayle. If the thorstein is sizzling and the thorstein vituperate the dayle then the dayle is maidenlike. If the thorstein is sizzling then the thorstein ablactate the dayle. If someone ablactate the dayle then they chase the thorstein. If the dayle vituperate the thorstein then the dayle wander the thorstein. If someone is choleraic then they eat the thorstein. The thorstein is sizzling.", "logic": "\nMaidenlike(dayle)\nWander(thorstein, dayle)\nSizzling(thorstein)\nforall x (Vituperate(x, dayle) and Vituperate(dayle, thorstein) -> Vituperate(thorstein, dayle))\nSizzling(thorstein) and Vituperate(thorstein, dayle) -> Maidenlike(dayle)\nSizzling(thorstein) -> Ablactate(thorstein, dayle)\nforall x (Ablactate(x, dayle) -> Ablactate(x, thorstein))\nVituperate(dayle, thorstein) -> Wander(dayle, thorstein)\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Wander(x, thorstein))\n\nSizzling(thorstein)\n\ntherefore Sizzling(thorstein)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The lenora is demode. The carrol supplement the lenora. The carrol is nominated. If someone differ the lenora and the lenora differ the carrol then the carrol differ the lenora. If the carrol is nominated and the carrol differ the lenora then the lenora is demode. If the carrol is nominated then the carrol flank the lenora. If someone flank the lenora then they chase the carrol. If the lenora differ the carrol then the lenora supplement the carrol. If someone is nonviscid then they eat the carrol. The carrol does not eat the lenora.", "logic": "\nDemode(lenora)\nSupplement(carrol, lenora)\nNominated(carrol)\nforall x (Differ(x, lenora) and Differ(lenora, carrol) -> Differ(carrol, lenora))\nNominated(carrol) and Differ(carrol, lenora) -> Demode(lenora)\nNominated(carrol) -> Flank(carrol, lenora)\nforall x (Flank(x, lenora) -> Flank(x, carrol))\nDiffer(lenora, carrol) -> Supplement(lenora, carrol)\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) -> Supplement(x, carrol))\n\nnot Supplement(carrol, lenora)\n\ntherefore Supplement(carrol, lenora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The josefina is mechanised. The heddi file the josefina. The heddi is eyelike. If someone idle the josefina and the josefina idle the heddi then the heddi idle the josefina. If the heddi is eyelike and the heddi idle the josefina then the josefina is mechanised. If the heddi is eyelike then the heddi immure the josefina. If someone immure the josefina then they chase the heddi. If the josefina idle the heddi then the josefina file the heddi. If someone is bombproof then they eat the heddi. The heddi immure the josefina.", "logic": "\nMechanised(josefina)\nFile(heddi, josefina)\nEyelike(heddi)\nforall x (Idle(x, josefina) and Idle(josefina, heddi) -> Idle(heddi, josefina))\nEyelike(heddi) and Idle(heddi, josefina) -> Mechanised(josefina)\nEyelike(heddi) -> Immure(heddi, josefina)\nforall x (Immure(x, josefina) -> Immure(x, heddi))\nIdle(josefina, heddi) -> File(josefina, heddi)\nforall x (Bombproof(x) -> File(x, heddi))\n\nImmure(heddi, josefina)\n\nEyelike(heddi) and Eyelike(heddi) -> Immure(heddi, josefina) -> therefore Immure(heddi, josefina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The rafaelita is analytical. The noam rape the rafaelita. The noam is lenticular. If someone graze the rafaelita and the rafaelita graze the noam then the noam graze the rafaelita. If the noam is lenticular and the noam graze the rafaelita then the rafaelita is analytical. If the noam is lenticular then the noam gangrene the rafaelita. If someone gangrene the rafaelita then they chase the noam. If the rafaelita graze the noam then the rafaelita rape the noam. If someone is subtropic then they eat the noam. The noam does not chase the rafaelita.", "logic": "\nAnalytical(rafaelita)\nRape(noam, rafaelita)\nLenticular(noam)\nforall x (Graze(x, rafaelita) and Graze(rafaelita, noam) -> Graze(noam, rafaelita))\nLenticular(noam) and Graze(noam, rafaelita) -> Analytical(rafaelita)\nLenticular(noam) -> Gangrene(noam, rafaelita)\nforall x (Gangrene(x, rafaelita) -> Gangrene(x, noam))\nGraze(rafaelita, noam) -> Rape(rafaelita, noam)\nforall x (Subtropic(x) -> Rape(x, noam))\n\nnot Gangrene(noam, rafaelita)\n\nLenticular(noam) and Lenticular(noam) -> Gangrene(noam, rafaelita) -> therefore Gangrene(noam, rafaelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The aryn is entrenched. The giffy resole the aryn. The giffy is slowgoing. If someone mutate the aryn and the aryn mutate the giffy then the giffy mutate the aryn. If the giffy is slowgoing and the giffy mutate the aryn then the aryn is entrenched. If the giffy is slowgoing then the giffy conjugate the aryn. If someone conjugate the aryn then they chase the giffy. If the aryn mutate the giffy then the aryn resole the giffy. If someone is resident then they eat the giffy. The giffy conjugate the giffy.", "logic": "\nEntrenched(aryn)\nResole(giffy, aryn)\nSlowgoing(giffy)\nforall x (Mutate(x, aryn) and Mutate(aryn, giffy) -> Mutate(giffy, aryn))\nSlowgoing(giffy) and Mutate(giffy, aryn) -> Entrenched(aryn)\nSlowgoing(giffy) -> Conjugate(giffy, aryn)\nforall x (Conjugate(x, aryn) -> Conjugate(x, giffy))\nMutate(aryn, giffy) -> Resole(aryn, giffy)\nforall x (Resident(x) -> Resole(x, giffy))\n\nConjugate(giffy, giffy)\n\nSlowgoing(giffy) and Slowgoing(giffy) -> Conjugate(giffy, aryn) -> therefore Conjugate(giffy, aryn) Conjugate(giffy, aryn) and forall x (Conjugate(x, aryn) -> Conjugate(x, giffy)) -> therefore Conjugate(giffy, giffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The torin is latin. The clarinda factor the torin. The clarinda is spiffy. If someone canvas the torin and the torin canvas the clarinda then the clarinda canvas the torin. If the clarinda is spiffy and the clarinda canvas the torin then the torin is latin. If the clarinda is spiffy then the clarinda yank the torin. If someone yank the torin then they chase the clarinda. If the torin canvas the clarinda then the torin factor the clarinda. If someone is upset then they eat the clarinda. The clarinda does not chase the clarinda.", "logic": "\nLatin(torin)\nFactor(clarinda, torin)\nSpiffy(clarinda)\nforall x (Canvas(x, torin) and Canvas(torin, clarinda) -> Canvas(clarinda, torin))\nSpiffy(clarinda) and Canvas(clarinda, torin) -> Latin(torin)\nSpiffy(clarinda) -> Yank(clarinda, torin)\nforall x (Yank(x, torin) -> Yank(x, clarinda))\nCanvas(torin, clarinda) -> Factor(torin, clarinda)\nforall x (Upset(x) -> Factor(x, clarinda))\n\nnot Yank(clarinda, clarinda)\n\nSpiffy(clarinda) and Spiffy(clarinda) -> Yank(clarinda, torin) -> therefore Yank(clarinda, torin) Yank(clarinda, torin) and forall x (Yank(x, torin) -> Yank(x, clarinda)) -> therefore Yank(clarinda, clarinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The alexine is frostian. The douggie pertain the alexine. The douggie is braggart. If someone goggle the alexine and the alexine goggle the douggie then the douggie goggle the alexine. If the douggie is braggart and the douggie goggle the alexine then the alexine is frostian. If the douggie is braggart then the douggie raffle the alexine. If someone raffle the alexine then they chase the douggie. If the alexine goggle the douggie then the alexine pertain the douggie. If someone is dubitable then they eat the douggie. The alexine does not eat the douggie.", "logic": "\nFrostian(alexine)\nPertain(douggie, alexine)\nBraggart(douggie)\nforall x (Goggle(x, alexine) and Goggle(alexine, douggie) -> Goggle(douggie, alexine))\nBraggart(douggie) and Goggle(douggie, alexine) -> Frostian(alexine)\nBraggart(douggie) -> Raffle(douggie, alexine)\nforall x (Raffle(x, alexine) -> Raffle(x, douggie))\nGoggle(alexine, douggie) -> Pertain(alexine, douggie)\nforall x (Dubitable(x) -> Pertain(x, douggie))\n\nnot Pertain(alexine, douggie)\n\nGoggle(alexine, douggie) -> Pertain(alexine, douggie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The mozelle is recessive. The uri jumpstart the mozelle. The uri is frivolous. If someone chaffer the mozelle and the mozelle chaffer the uri then the uri chaffer the mozelle. If the uri is frivolous and the uri chaffer the mozelle then the mozelle is recessive. If the uri is frivolous then the uri acquiesce the mozelle. If someone acquiesce the mozelle then they chase the uri. If the mozelle chaffer the uri then the mozelle jumpstart the uri. If someone is comical then they eat the uri. The mozelle acquiesce the uri.", "logic": "\nRecessive(mozelle)\nJumpstart(uri, mozelle)\nFrivolous(uri)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, mozelle) and Chaffer(mozelle, uri) -> Chaffer(uri, mozelle))\nFrivolous(uri) and Chaffer(uri, mozelle) -> Recessive(mozelle)\nFrivolous(uri) -> Acquiesce(uri, mozelle)\nforall x (Acquiesce(x, mozelle) -> Acquiesce(x, uri))\nChaffer(mozelle, uri) -> Jumpstart(mozelle, uri)\nforall x (Comical(x) -> Jumpstart(x, uri))\n\nAcquiesce(mozelle, uri)\n\nforall x (Acquiesce(x, mozelle) -> Acquiesce(x, uri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The bill is redolent. The beatrix confab the bill. The beatrix is bust. If someone gluttonize the bill and the bill gluttonize the beatrix then the beatrix gluttonize the bill. If the beatrix is bust and the beatrix gluttonize the bill then the bill is redolent. If the beatrix is bust then the beatrix camouflage the bill. If someone camouflage the bill then they chase the beatrix. If the bill gluttonize the beatrix then the bill confab the beatrix. If someone is uncounted then they eat the beatrix. The beatrix does not eat the beatrix.", "logic": "\nRedolent(bill)\nConfab(beatrix, bill)\nBust(beatrix)\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, bill) and Gluttonize(bill, beatrix) -> Gluttonize(beatrix, bill))\nBust(beatrix) and Gluttonize(beatrix, bill) -> Redolent(bill)\nBust(beatrix) -> Camouflage(beatrix, bill)\nforall x (Camouflage(x, bill) -> Camouflage(x, beatrix))\nGluttonize(bill, beatrix) -> Confab(bill, beatrix)\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Confab(x, beatrix))\n\nnot Confab(beatrix, beatrix)\n\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Confab(x, beatrix)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The karil is swimming. The albrecht focalise the karil. The albrecht is sublimated. If someone forewarn the karil and the karil forewarn the albrecht then the albrecht forewarn the karil. If the albrecht is sublimated and the albrecht forewarn the karil then the karil is swimming. If the albrecht is sublimated then the albrecht deride the karil. If someone deride the karil then they chase the albrecht. If the karil forewarn the albrecht then the karil focalise the albrecht. If someone is unbeknown then they eat the albrecht. The karil deride the karil.", "logic": "\nSwimming(karil)\nFocalise(albrecht, karil)\nSublimated(albrecht)\nforall x (Forewarn(x, karil) and Forewarn(karil, albrecht) -> Forewarn(albrecht, karil))\nSublimated(albrecht) and Forewarn(albrecht, karil) -> Swimming(karil)\nSublimated(albrecht) -> Deride(albrecht, karil)\nforall x (Deride(x, karil) -> Deride(x, albrecht))\nForewarn(karil, albrecht) -> Focalise(karil, albrecht)\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) -> Focalise(x, albrecht))\n\nDeride(karil, karil)\n\nDeride(karil, karil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The lin is fabled. The paul shove the lin. The paul is rouged. If someone oxidise the lin and the lin oxidise the paul then the paul oxidise the lin. If the paul is rouged and the paul oxidise the lin then the lin is fabled. If the paul is rouged then the paul expound the lin. If someone expound the lin then they chase the paul. If the lin oxidise the paul then the lin shove the paul. If someone is panoplied then they eat the paul. The lin does not eat the lin.", "logic": "\nFabled(lin)\nShove(paul, lin)\nRouged(paul)\nforall x (Oxidise(x, lin) and Oxidise(lin, paul) -> Oxidise(paul, lin))\nRouged(paul) and Oxidise(paul, lin) -> Fabled(lin)\nRouged(paul) -> Expound(paul, lin)\nforall x (Expound(x, lin) -> Expound(x, paul))\nOxidise(lin, paul) -> Shove(lin, paul)\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> Shove(x, paul))\n\nnot Shove(lin, lin)\n\nnot Shove(lin, lin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The jorie is petaloid. The cilka junket the jorie. The cilka is fahrenheit. If someone regroup the jorie and the jorie regroup the cilka then the cilka regroup the jorie. If the cilka is fahrenheit and the cilka regroup the jorie then the jorie is petaloid. If the cilka is fahrenheit then the cilka moralize the jorie. If someone moralize the jorie then they chase the cilka. If the jorie regroup the cilka then the jorie junket the cilka. If someone is sorted then they eat the cilka. The cilka is petaloid.", "logic": "\nPetaloid(jorie)\nJunket(cilka, jorie)\nFahrenheit(cilka)\nforall x (Regroup(x, jorie) and Regroup(jorie, cilka) -> Regroup(cilka, jorie))\nFahrenheit(cilka) and Regroup(cilka, jorie) -> Petaloid(jorie)\nFahrenheit(cilka) -> Moralize(cilka, jorie)\nforall x (Moralize(x, jorie) -> Moralize(x, cilka))\nRegroup(jorie, cilka) -> Junket(jorie, cilka)\nforall x (Sorted(x) -> Junket(x, cilka))\n\nPetaloid(cilka)\n\nPetaloid(cilka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-775"} {"premises": "The michaella is parky. The michaella is not perverse. The michaella is nauseating. If something is native and fashioned then it is not perverse. Nice things are nauseating. If something is native then it is fashioned. If something is perverse and not parky then it is native. If something is nauseating then it is native. All perverse things are native. The michaella is not perverse.", "logic": "\nParky(michaella)\nnot Perverse(michaella)\nNauseating(michaella)\nforall x (Native(x) and Fashioned(x) -> not Perverse(x))\nforall x (Fashioned(x) -> Nauseating(x))\nforall x (Native(x) -> Fashioned(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) and not Parky(x) -> Native(x))\nforall x (Nauseating(x) -> Native(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Native(x))\n\nnot Perverse(michaella)\n\ntherefore not Perverse(michaella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "The orelle is amoristic. The orelle is not betting. The orelle is dishonored. If something is knotty and deltoid then it is not betting. Nice things are dishonored. If something is knotty then it is deltoid. If something is betting and not amoristic then it is knotty. If something is dishonored then it is knotty. All betting things are knotty. The orelle is betting.", "logic": "\nAmoristic(orelle)\nnot Betting(orelle)\nDishonored(orelle)\nforall x (Knotty(x) and Deltoid(x) -> not Betting(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Knotty(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) and not Amoristic(x) -> Knotty(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Knotty(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) -> Knotty(x))\n\nBetting(orelle)\n\ntherefore not Betting(orelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "The arline is mechanical. The arline is not ovarian. The arline is hypaethral. If something is maoist and clammy then it is not ovarian. Nice things are hypaethral. If something is maoist then it is clammy. If something is ovarian and not mechanical then it is maoist. If something is hypaethral then it is maoist. All ovarian things are maoist. The arline is maoist.", "logic": "\nMechanical(arline)\nnot Ovarian(arline)\nHypaethral(arline)\nforall x (Maoist(x) and Clammy(x) -> not Ovarian(x))\nforall x (Clammy(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) and not Mechanical(x) -> Maoist(x))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) -> Maoist(x))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) -> Maoist(x))\n\nMaoist(arline)\n\nHypaethral(arline) and forall x (Hypaethral(x) -> Maoist(x)) -> therefore Maoist(arline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "The tymon is cancelled. The tymon is not acinose. The tymon is rhythmic. If something is basilary and offensive then it is not acinose. Nice things are rhythmic. If something is basilary then it is offensive. If something is acinose and not cancelled then it is basilary. If something is rhythmic then it is basilary. All acinose things are basilary. The tymon is not basilary.", "logic": "\nCancelled(tymon)\nnot Acinose(tymon)\nRhythmic(tymon)\nforall x (Basilary(x) and Offensive(x) -> not Acinose(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Rhythmic(x))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Acinose(x) and not Cancelled(x) -> Basilary(x))\nforall x (Rhythmic(x) -> Basilary(x))\nforall x (Acinose(x) -> Basilary(x))\n\nnot Basilary(tymon)\n\nRhythmic(tymon) and forall x (Rhythmic(x) -> Basilary(x)) -> therefore Basilary(tymon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "The melessa is puerperal. The melessa is not spotless. The melessa is derogative. If something is royal and faecal then it is not spotless. Nice things are derogative. If something is royal then it is faecal. If something is spotless and not puerperal then it is royal. If something is derogative then it is royal. All spotless things are royal. The melessa is faecal.", "logic": "\nPuerperal(melessa)\nnot Spotless(melessa)\nDerogative(melessa)\nforall x (Royal(x) and Faecal(x) -> not Spotless(x))\nforall x (Faecal(x) -> Derogative(x))\nforall x (Royal(x) -> Faecal(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) and not Puerperal(x) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Derogative(x) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) -> Royal(x))\n\nFaecal(melessa)\n\nDerogative(melessa) and forall x (Derogative(x) -> Royal(x)) -> therefore Royal(melessa) Royal(melessa) and forall x (Royal(x) -> Faecal(x)) -> therefore Faecal(melessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "The rufus is resinated. The rufus is not coordinate. The rufus is flukey. If something is mined and slim then it is not coordinate. Nice things are flukey. If something is mined then it is slim. If something is coordinate and not resinated then it is mined. If something is flukey then it is mined. All coordinate things are mined. The rufus is not slim.", "logic": "\nResinated(rufus)\nnot Coordinate(rufus)\nFlukey(rufus)\nforall x (Mined(x) and Slim(x) -> not Coordinate(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) -> Slim(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) and not Resinated(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Flukey(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Mined(x))\n\nnot Slim(rufus)\n\nFlukey(rufus) and forall x (Flukey(x) -> Mined(x)) -> therefore Mined(rufus) Mined(rufus) and forall x (Mined(x) -> Slim(x)) -> therefore Slim(rufus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "The adrianne is hypodermic. The adrianne is not laced. The adrianne is ptolemaic. If something is oriented and cocky then it is not laced. Nice things are ptolemaic. If something is oriented then it is cocky. If something is laced and not hypodermic then it is oriented. If something is ptolemaic then it is oriented. All laced things are oriented. The adrianne does not visit the adrianne.", "logic": "\nHypodermic(adrianne)\nnot Laced(adrianne)\nPtolemaic(adrianne)\nforall x (Oriented(x) and Cocky(x) -> not Laced(x))\nforall x (Cocky(x) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Oriented(x) -> Cocky(x))\nforall x (Laced(x) and not Hypodermic(x) -> Oriented(x))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Oriented(x))\nforall x (Laced(x) -> Oriented(x))\n\nnot Visits(adrianne, adrianne)\n\nnot Visits(adrianne, adrianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "The vincent is necked. The vincent is not overmodest. The vincent is monastical. If something is incan and outlying then it is not overmodest. Nice things are monastical. If something is incan then it is outlying. If something is overmodest and not necked then it is incan. If something is monastical then it is incan. All overmodest things are incan. The vincent eats the vincent.", "logic": "\nNecked(vincent)\nnot Overmodest(vincent)\nMonastical(vincent)\nforall x (Incan(x) and Outlying(x) -> not Overmodest(x))\nforall x (Outlying(x) -> Monastical(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Overmodest(x) and not Necked(x) -> Incan(x))\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> Incan(x))\nforall x (Overmodest(x) -> Incan(x))\n\nEats(vincent, vincent)\n\nEats(vincent, vincent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1764"} {"premises": "Sheffy is catalatic. Sheffy is cubelike. Rice is astounding. Rice is minimized. Rice is obdurate. Odelle is adipose. Odelle is catalatic. Odelle is alaskan. Odelle is minimized. Odelle is cubelike. If something is astounding then it is obdurate. If something is cubelike then it is astounding. Odelle is catalatic.", "logic": "\nCatalatic(sheffy)\nCubelike(sheffy)\nAstounding(rice)\nMinimized(rice)\nObdurate(rice)\nAdipose(odelle)\nCatalatic(odelle)\nAlaskan(odelle)\nMinimized(odelle)\nCubelike(odelle)\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> Obdurate(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) -> Astounding(x))\n\nCatalatic(odelle)\n\ntherefore Catalatic(odelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Erminie is multicolor. Erminie is squat. Mellisent is palatine. Mellisent is wolflike. Mellisent is cleavable. Wilburt is mouthlike. Wilburt is multicolor. Wilburt is cupric. Wilburt is wolflike. Wilburt is squat. If something is palatine then it is cleavable. If something is squat then it is palatine. Wilburt is not squat.", "logic": "\nMulticolor(erminie)\nSquat(erminie)\nPalatine(mellisent)\nWolflike(mellisent)\nCleavable(mellisent)\nMouthlike(wilburt)\nMulticolor(wilburt)\nCupric(wilburt)\nWolflike(wilburt)\nSquat(wilburt)\nforall x (Palatine(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Squat(x) -> Palatine(x))\n\nnot Squat(wilburt)\n\ntherefore Squat(wilburt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Davoud is vestmental. Davoud is walking. Debra is unmerited. Debra is antitumor. Debra is estranging. Estel is debasing. Estel is vestmental. Estel is bilious. Estel is antitumor. Estel is walking. If something is unmerited then it is estranging. If something is walking then it is unmerited. Estel is unmerited.", "logic": "\nVestmental(davoud)\nWalking(davoud)\nUnmerited(debra)\nAntitumor(debra)\nEstranging(debra)\nDebasing(estel)\nVestmental(estel)\nBilious(estel)\nAntitumor(estel)\nWalking(estel)\nforall x (Unmerited(x) -> Estranging(x))\nforall x (Walking(x) -> Unmerited(x))\n\nUnmerited(estel)\n\nWalking(estel) and forall x (Walking(x) -> Unmerited(x)) -> therefore Unmerited(estel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Felice is toxic. Felice is welcoming. Izabel is pentagonal. Izabel is onymous. Izabel is mutable. Zachery is upstage. Zachery is toxic. Zachery is palladian. Zachery is onymous. Zachery is welcoming. If something is pentagonal then it is mutable. If something is welcoming then it is pentagonal. Zachery is not pentagonal.", "logic": "\nToxic(felice)\nWelcoming(felice)\nPentagonal(izabel)\nOnymous(izabel)\nMutable(izabel)\nUpstage(zachery)\nToxic(zachery)\nPalladian(zachery)\nOnymous(zachery)\nWelcoming(zachery)\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\n\nnot Pentagonal(zachery)\n\nWelcoming(zachery) and forall x (Welcoming(x) -> Pentagonal(x)) -> therefore Pentagonal(zachery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Scott is saccadic. Scott is unlisted. Andra is apodous. Andra is neuromotor. Andra is manx. Merissa is azygos. Merissa is saccadic. Merissa is gleaming. Merissa is neuromotor. Merissa is unlisted. If something is apodous then it is manx. If something is unlisted then it is apodous. Scott is manx.", "logic": "\nSaccadic(scott)\nUnlisted(scott)\nApodous(andra)\nNeuromotor(andra)\nManx(andra)\nAzygos(merissa)\nSaccadic(merissa)\nGleaming(merissa)\nNeuromotor(merissa)\nUnlisted(merissa)\nforall x (Apodous(x) -> Manx(x))\nforall x (Unlisted(x) -> Apodous(x))\n\nManx(scott)\n\nUnlisted(scott) and forall x (Unlisted(x) -> Apodous(x)) -> therefore Apodous(scott) Apodous(scott) and forall x (Apodous(x) -> Manx(x)) -> therefore Manx(scott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Thorndike is immunised. Thorndike is precooked. Rosalyn is moorish. Rosalyn is unrequited. Rosalyn is censorious. Lucinda is waste. Lucinda is immunised. Lucinda is doglike. Lucinda is unrequited. Lucinda is precooked. If something is moorish then it is censorious. If something is precooked then it is moorish. Lucinda is not censorious.", "logic": "\nImmunised(thorndike)\nPrecooked(thorndike)\nMoorish(rosalyn)\nUnrequited(rosalyn)\nCensorious(rosalyn)\nWaste(lucinda)\nImmunised(lucinda)\nDoglike(lucinda)\nUnrequited(lucinda)\nPrecooked(lucinda)\nforall x (Moorish(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Precooked(x) -> Moorish(x))\n\nnot Censorious(lucinda)\n\nPrecooked(lucinda) and forall x (Precooked(x) -> Moorish(x)) -> therefore Moorish(lucinda) Moorish(lucinda) and forall x (Moorish(x) -> Censorious(x)) -> therefore Censorious(lucinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Emory is embedded. Emory is churlish. Horatio is uninitiate. Horatio is storeyed. Horatio is sternal. Idette is adust. Idette is embedded. Idette is inspiring. Idette is storeyed. Idette is churlish. If something is uninitiate then it is sternal. If something is churlish then it is uninitiate. Horatio is not adust.", "logic": "\nEmbedded(emory)\nChurlish(emory)\nUninitiate(horatio)\nStoreyed(horatio)\nSternal(horatio)\nAdust(idette)\nEmbedded(idette)\nInspiring(idette)\nStoreyed(idette)\nChurlish(idette)\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Sternal(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\n\nnot Adust(horatio)\n\nnot Adust(horatio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Jeniece is reticent. Jeniece is wonderful. Lenny is seasonal. Lenny is antitumour. Lenny is footsure. Ula is walloping. Ula is reticent. Ula is tanned. Ula is antitumour. Ula is wonderful. If something is seasonal then it is footsure. If something is wonderful then it is seasonal. Jeniece is walloping.", "logic": "\nReticent(jeniece)\nWonderful(jeniece)\nSeasonal(lenny)\nAntitumour(lenny)\nFootsure(lenny)\nWalloping(ula)\nReticent(ula)\nTanned(ula)\nAntitumour(ula)\nWonderful(ula)\nforall x (Seasonal(x) -> Footsure(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) -> Seasonal(x))\n\nWalloping(jeniece)\n\nWalloping(jeniece) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Emmanuel is tatty. Emmanuel is raiseable. Octavius is unfearing. Octavius is ribbonlike. Octavius is weensy. Samuella is bronchial. Samuella is tatty. Samuella is ossified. Samuella is ribbonlike. Samuella is raiseable. If something is unfearing then it is weensy. If something is raiseable then it is unfearing. Emmanuel is not ossified.", "logic": "\nTatty(emmanuel)\nRaiseable(emmanuel)\nUnfearing(octavius)\nRibbonlike(octavius)\nWeensy(octavius)\nBronchial(samuella)\nTatty(samuella)\nOssified(samuella)\nRibbonlike(samuella)\nRaiseable(samuella)\nforall x (Unfearing(x) -> Weensy(x))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) -> Unfearing(x))\n\nnot Ossified(emmanuel)\n\nnot Ossified(emmanuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Beilul is aureate. Beilul is cartesian. Sula is ungainly. Sula is flakey. Sula is inbuilt. Tomiko is wheaten. Tomiko is aureate. Tomiko is catchy. Tomiko is flakey. Tomiko is cartesian. If something is ungainly then it is inbuilt. If something is cartesian then it is ungainly. Beilul is flakey.", "logic": "\nAureate(beilul)\nCartesian(beilul)\nUngainly(sula)\nFlakey(sula)\nInbuilt(sula)\nWheaten(tomiko)\nAureate(tomiko)\nCatchy(tomiko)\nFlakey(tomiko)\nCartesian(tomiko)\nforall x (Ungainly(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Ungainly(x))\n\nFlakey(beilul)\n\nFlakey(beilul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Sibeal is unmannered. Sibeal is untaught. Augusto is beholden. Augusto is studded. Augusto is ariose. Stephan is exocrine. Stephan is unmannered. Stephan is nonfissile. Stephan is studded. Stephan is untaught. If something is beholden then it is ariose. If something is untaught then it is beholden. Augusto is not unmannered.", "logic": "\nUnmannered(sibeal)\nUntaught(sibeal)\nBeholden(augusto)\nStudded(augusto)\nAriose(augusto)\nExocrine(stephan)\nUnmannered(stephan)\nNonfissile(stephan)\nStudded(stephan)\nUntaught(stephan)\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> Ariose(x))\nforall x (Untaught(x) -> Beholden(x))\n\nnot Unmannered(augusto)\n\nnot Unmannered(augusto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Shellie is absolved. Shellie is algal. Barret is plethoric. Barret is extrinsic. Barret is cerous. Carrie is crippled. Carrie is absolved. Carrie is careful. Carrie is extrinsic. Carrie is algal. If something is plethoric then it is cerous. If something is algal then it is plethoric. Barret is careful.", "logic": "\nAbsolved(shellie)\nAlgal(shellie)\nPlethoric(barret)\nExtrinsic(barret)\nCerous(barret)\nCrippled(carrie)\nAbsolved(carrie)\nCareful(carrie)\nExtrinsic(carrie)\nAlgal(carrie)\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Cerous(x))\nforall x (Algal(x) -> Plethoric(x))\n\nCareful(barret)\n\nCareful(barret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-419"} {"premises": "Chanda is draining. Chanda is agnostic. Chanda is terrene. Chanda is vitiated. Chanda is subsidized. Callida is spongelike. Callida is islamic. Young, spongelike people are vitiated. If someone is draining and subsidized then they are vitiated. White people are vitiated. If someone is terrene and islamic then they are draining. All vitiated, spongelike people are draining. If Callida is draining and Callida is spongelike then Callida is agnostic. Callida is spongelike.", "logic": "\nDraining(chanda)\nAgnostic(chanda)\nTerrene(chanda)\nVitiated(chanda)\nSubsidized(chanda)\nSpongelike(callida)\nIslamic(callida)\nforall x (Islamic(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Vitiated(x))\nforall x (Draining(x) and Subsidized(x) -> Vitiated(x))\nforall x (Subsidized(x) -> Vitiated(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Islamic(x) -> Draining(x))\nforall x (Vitiated(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Draining(x))\nDraining(callida) and Spongelike(callida) -> Agnostic(callida)\n\nSpongelike(callida)\n\ntherefore Spongelike(callida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Alfonzo is sorrowing. Alfonzo is super. Alfonzo is admittible. Alfonzo is motherlike. Alfonzo is sinistral. Bryan is scalar. Bryan is atomic. Young, scalar people are motherlike. If someone is sorrowing and sinistral then they are motherlike. White people are motherlike. If someone is admittible and atomic then they are sorrowing. All motherlike, scalar people are sorrowing. If Bryan is sorrowing and Bryan is scalar then Bryan is super. Alfonzo is not admittible.", "logic": "\nSorrowing(alfonzo)\nSuper(alfonzo)\nAdmittible(alfonzo)\nMotherlike(alfonzo)\nSinistral(alfonzo)\nScalar(bryan)\nAtomic(bryan)\nforall x (Atomic(x) and Scalar(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Sinistral(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) and Atomic(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and Scalar(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\nSorrowing(bryan) and Scalar(bryan) -> Super(bryan)\n\nnot Admittible(alfonzo)\n\ntherefore Admittible(alfonzo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Gustaf is beamy. Gustaf is kindly. Gustaf is literal. Gustaf is redeemed. Gustaf is gracile. Edi is potent. Edi is cousinly. Young, potent people are redeemed. If someone is beamy and gracile then they are redeemed. White people are redeemed. If someone is literal and cousinly then they are beamy. All redeemed, potent people are beamy. If Edi is beamy and Edi is potent then Edi is kindly. Edi is redeemed.", "logic": "\nBeamy(gustaf)\nKindly(gustaf)\nLiteral(gustaf)\nRedeemed(gustaf)\nGracile(gustaf)\nPotent(edi)\nCousinly(edi)\nforall x (Cousinly(x) and Potent(x) -> Redeemed(x))\nforall x (Beamy(x) and Gracile(x) -> Redeemed(x))\nforall x (Gracile(x) -> Redeemed(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Cousinly(x) -> Beamy(x))\nforall x (Redeemed(x) and Potent(x) -> Beamy(x))\nBeamy(edi) and Potent(edi) -> Kindly(edi)\n\nRedeemed(edi)\n\nCousinly(edi) and Potent(edi) and forall x (Cousinly(x) and Potent(x) -> Redeemed(x)) -> therefore Redeemed(edi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Armando is doglike. Armando is rabid. Armando is steadfast. Armando is titular. Armando is sintered. Patrica is twopenny. Patrica is spiny. Young, twopenny people are titular. If someone is doglike and sintered then they are titular. White people are titular. If someone is steadfast and spiny then they are doglike. All titular, twopenny people are doglike. If Patrica is doglike and Patrica is twopenny then Patrica is rabid. Patrica is not titular.", "logic": "\nDoglike(armando)\nRabid(armando)\nSteadfast(armando)\nTitular(armando)\nSintered(armando)\nTwopenny(patrica)\nSpiny(patrica)\nforall x (Spiny(x) and Twopenny(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Doglike(x) and Sintered(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Sintered(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) and Spiny(x) -> Doglike(x))\nforall x (Titular(x) and Twopenny(x) -> Doglike(x))\nDoglike(patrica) and Twopenny(patrica) -> Rabid(patrica)\n\nnot Titular(patrica)\n\nSpiny(patrica) and Twopenny(patrica) and forall x (Spiny(x) and Twopenny(x) -> Titular(x)) -> therefore Titular(patrica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Celisse is humongous. Celisse is labeled. Celisse is proto. Celisse is schematic. Celisse is epicarpal. Channa is permanent. Channa is formulaic. Young, permanent people are schematic. If someone is humongous and epicarpal then they are schematic. White people are schematic. If someone is proto and formulaic then they are humongous. All schematic, permanent people are humongous. If Channa is humongous and Channa is permanent then Channa is labeled. Channa is humongous.", "logic": "\nHumongous(celisse)\nLabeled(celisse)\nProto(celisse)\nSchematic(celisse)\nEpicarpal(celisse)\nPermanent(channa)\nFormulaic(channa)\nforall x (Formulaic(x) and Permanent(x) -> Schematic(x))\nforall x (Humongous(x) and Epicarpal(x) -> Schematic(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) -> Schematic(x))\nforall x (Proto(x) and Formulaic(x) -> Humongous(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) and Permanent(x) -> Humongous(x))\nHumongous(channa) and Permanent(channa) -> Labeled(channa)\n\nHumongous(channa)\n\nFormulaic(channa) and Permanent(channa) and forall x (Formulaic(x) and Permanent(x) -> Schematic(x)) -> therefore Schematic(channa) Schematic(channa) and Permanent(channa) and forall x (Schematic(x) and Permanent(x) -> Humongous(x)) -> therefore Humongous(channa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Daisey is caecilian. Daisey is truncated. Daisey is unthematic. Daisey is prompt. Daisey is ungrasped. Daniela is ovine. Daniela is perky. Young, ovine people are prompt. If someone is caecilian and ungrasped then they are prompt. White people are prompt. If someone is unthematic and perky then they are caecilian. All prompt, ovine people are caecilian. If Daniela is caecilian and Daniela is ovine then Daniela is truncated. Daniela is not caecilian.", "logic": "\nCaecilian(daisey)\nTruncated(daisey)\nUnthematic(daisey)\nPrompt(daisey)\nUngrasped(daisey)\nOvine(daniela)\nPerky(daniela)\nforall x (Perky(x) and Ovine(x) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and Ungrasped(x) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) and Perky(x) -> Caecilian(x))\nforall x (Prompt(x) and Ovine(x) -> Caecilian(x))\nCaecilian(daniela) and Ovine(daniela) -> Truncated(daniela)\n\nnot Caecilian(daniela)\n\nPerky(daniela) and Ovine(daniela) and forall x (Perky(x) and Ovine(x) -> Prompt(x)) -> therefore Prompt(daniela) Prompt(daniela) and Ovine(daniela) and forall x (Prompt(x) and Ovine(x) -> Caecilian(x)) -> therefore Caecilian(daniela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Mikhail is scared. Mikhail is pimpled. Mikhail is armoured. Mikhail is overfull. Mikhail is bolshy. Jeanette is tactical. Jeanette is alvine. Young, tactical people are overfull. If someone is scared and bolshy then they are overfull. White people are overfull. If someone is armoured and alvine then they are scared. All overfull, tactical people are scared. If Jeanette is scared and Jeanette is tactical then Jeanette is pimpled. Mikhail is not alvine.", "logic": "\nScared(mikhail)\nPimpled(mikhail)\nArmoured(mikhail)\nOverfull(mikhail)\nBolshy(mikhail)\nTactical(jeanette)\nAlvine(jeanette)\nforall x (Alvine(x) and Tactical(x) -> Overfull(x))\nforall x (Scared(x) and Bolshy(x) -> Overfull(x))\nforall x (Bolshy(x) -> Overfull(x))\nforall x (Armoured(x) and Alvine(x) -> Scared(x))\nforall x (Overfull(x) and Tactical(x) -> Scared(x))\nScared(jeanette) and Tactical(jeanette) -> Pimpled(jeanette)\n\nnot Alvine(mikhail)\n\nnot Alvine(mikhail) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Ashlie is desiccated. Ashlie is fleet. Ashlie is becalmed. Ashlie is idealised. Ashlie is regulative. Nathan is looseleaf. Nathan is shapeless. Young, looseleaf people are idealised. If someone is desiccated and regulative then they are idealised. White people are idealised. If someone is becalmed and shapeless then they are desiccated. All idealised, looseleaf people are desiccated. If Nathan is desiccated and Nathan is looseleaf then Nathan is fleet. Ashlie is looseleaf.", "logic": "\nDesiccated(ashlie)\nFleet(ashlie)\nBecalmed(ashlie)\nIdealised(ashlie)\nRegulative(ashlie)\nLooseleaf(nathan)\nShapeless(nathan)\nforall x (Shapeless(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and Regulative(x) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Regulative(x) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Becalmed(x) and Shapeless(x) -> Desiccated(x))\nforall x (Idealised(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Desiccated(x))\nDesiccated(nathan) and Looseleaf(nathan) -> Fleet(nathan)\n\nLooseleaf(ashlie)\n\nLooseleaf(ashlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Feliza is andante. Feliza is gallant. Feliza is splenetic. Feliza is uncrannied. Feliza is verifying. Merralee is hardline. Merralee is communal. Young, hardline people are uncrannied. If someone is andante and verifying then they are uncrannied. White people are uncrannied. If someone is splenetic and communal then they are andante. All uncrannied, hardline people are andante. If Merralee is andante and Merralee is hardline then Merralee is gallant. Merralee is not splenetic.", "logic": "\nAndante(feliza)\nGallant(feliza)\nSplenetic(feliza)\nUncrannied(feliza)\nVerifying(feliza)\nHardline(merralee)\nCommunal(merralee)\nforall x (Communal(x) and Hardline(x) -> Uncrannied(x))\nforall x (Andante(x) and Verifying(x) -> Uncrannied(x))\nforall x (Verifying(x) -> Uncrannied(x))\nforall x (Splenetic(x) and Communal(x) -> Andante(x))\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) and Hardline(x) -> Andante(x))\nAndante(merralee) and Hardline(merralee) -> Gallant(merralee)\n\nnot Splenetic(merralee)\n\nnot Splenetic(merralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Konstanze is asternal. Konstanze is granular. Konstanze is biographic. Konstanze is varnished. Konstanze is ungeared. Amandie is smokeless. Amandie is listless. Young, smokeless people are varnished. If someone is asternal and ungeared then they are varnished. White people are varnished. If someone is biographic and listless then they are asternal. All varnished, smokeless people are asternal. If Amandie is asternal and Amandie is smokeless then Amandie is granular. Amandie is ungeared.", "logic": "\nAsternal(konstanze)\nGranular(konstanze)\nBiographic(konstanze)\nVarnished(konstanze)\nUngeared(konstanze)\nSmokeless(amandie)\nListless(amandie)\nforall x (Listless(x) and Smokeless(x) -> Varnished(x))\nforall x (Asternal(x) and Ungeared(x) -> Varnished(x))\nforall x (Ungeared(x) -> Varnished(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) and Listless(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) and Smokeless(x) -> Asternal(x))\nAsternal(amandie) and Smokeless(amandie) -> Granular(amandie)\n\nUngeared(amandie)\n\nUngeared(amandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-509"} {"premises": "Margalo is not tentacular. Margalo is proud. Margalo is barbadian. Margalo is iliac. Margalo is duplicate. Curt is tentacular. Curt is proud. Curt is barbadian. Curt is expedient. Curt is not puerperal. Curt is iliac. Curt is not duplicate. Horatia is proud. Horatia is not expedient. Horatia is puerperal. Horatia is iliac. Kind things are expedient. All barbadian, expedient things are not puerperal. Margalo is barbadian.", "logic": "\nnot Tentacular(margalo)\nProud(margalo)\nBarbadian(margalo)\nIliac(margalo)\nDuplicate(margalo)\nTentacular(curt)\nProud(curt)\nBarbadian(curt)\nExpedient(curt)\nnot Puerperal(curt)\nIliac(curt)\nnot Duplicate(curt)\nProud(horatia)\nnot Expedient(horatia)\nPuerperal(horatia)\nIliac(horatia)\nforall x (Barbadian(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) and Expedient(x) -> not Puerperal(x))\n\nBarbadian(margalo)\n\ntherefore Barbadian(margalo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Stephenie is not modifiable. Stephenie is infirm. Stephenie is anglican. Stephenie is inlaid. Stephenie is unpainful. Arabella is modifiable. Arabella is infirm. Arabella is anglican. Arabella is cometic. Arabella is not montane. Arabella is inlaid. Arabella is not unpainful. Abagail is infirm. Abagail is not cometic. Abagail is montane. Abagail is inlaid. Kind things are cometic. All anglican, cometic things are not montane. Arabella is not infirm.", "logic": "\nnot Modifiable(stephenie)\nInfirm(stephenie)\nAnglican(stephenie)\nInlaid(stephenie)\nUnpainful(stephenie)\nModifiable(arabella)\nInfirm(arabella)\nAnglican(arabella)\nCometic(arabella)\nnot Montane(arabella)\nInlaid(arabella)\nnot Unpainful(arabella)\nInfirm(abagail)\nnot Cometic(abagail)\nMontane(abagail)\nInlaid(abagail)\nforall x (Anglican(x) -> Cometic(x))\nforall x (Anglican(x) and Cometic(x) -> not Montane(x))\n\nnot Infirm(arabella)\n\ntherefore Infirm(arabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Kattie is not sightly. Kattie is declarable. Kattie is setaceous. Kattie is consumable. Kattie is syllabled. Josepha is sightly. Josepha is declarable. Josepha is setaceous. Josepha is dumfounded. Josepha is not patellar. Josepha is consumable. Josepha is not syllabled. Maegan is declarable. Maegan is not dumfounded. Maegan is patellar. Maegan is consumable. Kind things are dumfounded. All setaceous, dumfounded things are not patellar. Kattie is dumfounded.", "logic": "\nnot Sightly(kattie)\nDeclarable(kattie)\nSetaceous(kattie)\nConsumable(kattie)\nSyllabled(kattie)\nSightly(josepha)\nDeclarable(josepha)\nSetaceous(josepha)\nDumfounded(josepha)\nnot Patellar(josepha)\nConsumable(josepha)\nnot Syllabled(josepha)\nDeclarable(maegan)\nnot Dumfounded(maegan)\nPatellar(maegan)\nConsumable(maegan)\nforall x (Setaceous(x) -> Dumfounded(x))\nforall x (Setaceous(x) and Dumfounded(x) -> not Patellar(x))\n\nDumfounded(kattie)\n\nSetaceous(kattie) and forall x (Setaceous(x) -> Dumfounded(x)) -> therefore Dumfounded(kattie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Aime is not ergodic. Aime is uttermost. Aime is geodesic. Aime is cloggy. Aime is conic. Julee is ergodic. Julee is uttermost. Julee is geodesic. Julee is anionic. Julee is not brindled. Julee is cloggy. Julee is not conic. Noble is uttermost. Noble is not anionic. Noble is brindled. Noble is cloggy. Kind things are anionic. All geodesic, anionic things are not brindled. Aime is not anionic.", "logic": "\nnot Ergodic(aime)\nUttermost(aime)\nGeodesic(aime)\nCloggy(aime)\nConic(aime)\nErgodic(julee)\nUttermost(julee)\nGeodesic(julee)\nAnionic(julee)\nnot Brindled(julee)\nCloggy(julee)\nnot Conic(julee)\nUttermost(noble)\nnot Anionic(noble)\nBrindled(noble)\nCloggy(noble)\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Anionic(x))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) and Anionic(x) -> not Brindled(x))\n\nnot Anionic(aime)\n\nGeodesic(aime) and forall x (Geodesic(x) -> Anionic(x)) -> therefore Anionic(aime)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Kara is not daunting. Kara is exotic. Kara is verifiable. Kara is certified. Kara is unenviable. Clemmie is daunting. Clemmie is exotic. Clemmie is verifiable. Clemmie is telltale. Clemmie is not harrowing. Clemmie is certified. Clemmie is not unenviable. Rebbecca is exotic. Rebbecca is not telltale. Rebbecca is harrowing. Rebbecca is certified. Kind things are telltale. All verifiable, telltale things are not harrowing. Kara is not harrowing.", "logic": "\nnot Daunting(kara)\nExotic(kara)\nVerifiable(kara)\nCertified(kara)\nUnenviable(kara)\nDaunting(clemmie)\nExotic(clemmie)\nVerifiable(clemmie)\nTelltale(clemmie)\nnot Harrowing(clemmie)\nCertified(clemmie)\nnot Unenviable(clemmie)\nExotic(rebbecca)\nnot Telltale(rebbecca)\nHarrowing(rebbecca)\nCertified(rebbecca)\nforall x (Verifiable(x) -> Telltale(x))\nforall x (Verifiable(x) and Telltale(x) -> not Harrowing(x))\n\nnot Harrowing(kara)\n\nVerifiable(kara) and forall x (Verifiable(x) -> Telltale(x)) -> therefore Telltale(kara) Verifiable(kara) and Telltale(kara) and forall x (Verifiable(x) and Telltale(x) -> not Harrowing(x)) -> therefore not Harrowing(kara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Violet is not returnable. Violet is semisweet. Violet is coordinate. Violet is endemic. Violet is lamented. Buffy is returnable. Buffy is semisweet. Buffy is coordinate. Buffy is imposing. Buffy is not unfeasible. Buffy is endemic. Buffy is not lamented. Robenia is semisweet. Robenia is not imposing. Robenia is unfeasible. Robenia is endemic. Kind things are imposing. All coordinate, imposing things are not unfeasible. Violet is unfeasible.", "logic": "\nnot Returnable(violet)\nSemisweet(violet)\nCoordinate(violet)\nEndemic(violet)\nLamented(violet)\nReturnable(buffy)\nSemisweet(buffy)\nCoordinate(buffy)\nImposing(buffy)\nnot Unfeasible(buffy)\nEndemic(buffy)\nnot Lamented(buffy)\nSemisweet(robenia)\nnot Imposing(robenia)\nUnfeasible(robenia)\nEndemic(robenia)\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Imposing(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) and Imposing(x) -> not Unfeasible(x))\n\nUnfeasible(violet)\n\nCoordinate(violet) and forall x (Coordinate(x) -> Imposing(x)) -> therefore Imposing(violet) Coordinate(violet) and Imposing(violet) and forall x (Coordinate(x) and Imposing(x) -> not Unfeasible(x)) -> therefore not Unfeasible(violet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Katharina is not main. Katharina is taxonomic. Katharina is elect. Katharina is raftered. Katharina is prisonlike. Timothy is main. Timothy is taxonomic. Timothy is elect. Timothy is demotic. Timothy is not blaring. Timothy is raftered. Timothy is not prisonlike. Roarke is taxonomic. Roarke is not demotic. Roarke is blaring. Roarke is raftered. Kind things are demotic. All elect, demotic things are not blaring. Roarke is not main.", "logic": "\nnot Main(katharina)\nTaxonomic(katharina)\nElect(katharina)\nRaftered(katharina)\nPrisonlike(katharina)\nMain(timothy)\nTaxonomic(timothy)\nElect(timothy)\nDemotic(timothy)\nnot Blaring(timothy)\nRaftered(timothy)\nnot Prisonlike(timothy)\nTaxonomic(roarke)\nnot Demotic(roarke)\nBlaring(roarke)\nRaftered(roarke)\nforall x (Elect(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Elect(x) and Demotic(x) -> not Blaring(x))\n\nnot Main(roarke)\n\nnot Main(roarke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Stesha is not imitation. Stesha is peaky. Stesha is classless. Stesha is infallible. Stesha is streaky. Erastus is imitation. Erastus is peaky. Erastus is classless. Erastus is ambrosial. Erastus is not medium. Erastus is infallible. Erastus is not streaky. Graeme is peaky. Graeme is not ambrosial. Graeme is medium. Graeme is infallible. Kind things are ambrosial. All classless, ambrosial things are not medium. Graeme is streaky.", "logic": "\nnot Imitation(stesha)\nPeaky(stesha)\nClassless(stesha)\nInfallible(stesha)\nStreaky(stesha)\nImitation(erastus)\nPeaky(erastus)\nClassless(erastus)\nAmbrosial(erastus)\nnot Medium(erastus)\nInfallible(erastus)\nnot Streaky(erastus)\nPeaky(graeme)\nnot Ambrosial(graeme)\nMedium(graeme)\nInfallible(graeme)\nforall x (Classless(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\nforall x (Classless(x) and Ambrosial(x) -> not Medium(x))\n\nStreaky(graeme)\n\nStreaky(graeme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-600"} {"premises": "Prudy is rearmost. Brooke is animist. Furry things are rearmost. Cold things are divorced. Brooke is animist.", "logic": "\nRearmost(prudy)\nAnimist(brooke)\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Rearmost(x))\nforall x (Animist(x) -> Divorced(x))\n\nAnimist(brooke)\n\ntherefore Animist(brooke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Lenora is uncool. Pamella is iffy. Furry things are uncool. Cold things are opencut. Pamella is not iffy.", "logic": "\nUncool(lenora)\nIffy(pamella)\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> Uncool(x))\nforall x (Iffy(x) -> Opencut(x))\n\nnot Iffy(pamella)\n\ntherefore Iffy(pamella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Scarface is unitary. Marsiella is vented. Furry things are unitary. Cold things are spirited. Marsiella is spirited.", "logic": "\nUnitary(scarface)\nVented(marsiella)\nforall x (Spirited(x) -> Unitary(x))\nforall x (Vented(x) -> Spirited(x))\n\nSpirited(marsiella)\n\nVented(marsiella) and forall x (Vented(x) -> Spirited(x)) -> therefore Spirited(marsiella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Remus is autogamic. Lilli is dormie. Furry things are autogamic. Cold things are ahorseback. Lilli is not ahorseback.", "logic": "\nAutogamic(remus)\nDormie(lilli)\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> Autogamic(x))\nforall x (Dormie(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\n\nnot Ahorseback(lilli)\n\nDormie(lilli) and forall x (Dormie(x) -> Ahorseback(x)) -> therefore Ahorseback(lilli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Reese is blunt. Renault is dominating. Furry things are blunt. Cold things are bonzer. Renault is blunt.", "logic": "\nBlunt(reese)\nDominating(renault)\nforall x (Bonzer(x) -> Blunt(x))\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Bonzer(x))\n\nBlunt(renault)\n\nDominating(renault) and forall x (Dominating(x) -> Bonzer(x)) -> therefore Bonzer(renault) Bonzer(renault) and forall x (Bonzer(x) -> Blunt(x)) -> therefore Blunt(renault)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Mauricio is runaway. Andonis is inland. Furry things are runaway. Cold things are discoid. Andonis is not runaway.", "logic": "\nRunaway(mauricio)\nInland(andonis)\nforall x (Discoid(x) -> Runaway(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) -> Discoid(x))\n\nnot Runaway(andonis)\n\nInland(andonis) and forall x (Inland(x) -> Discoid(x)) -> therefore Discoid(andonis) Discoid(andonis) and forall x (Discoid(x) -> Runaway(x)) -> therefore Runaway(andonis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Stuart is apsidal. Urbano is resistive. Furry things are apsidal. Cold things are cognizable. Stuart is not cognizable.", "logic": "\nApsidal(stuart)\nResistive(urbano)\nforall x (Cognizable(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Resistive(x) -> Cognizable(x))\n\nnot Cognizable(stuart)\n\nforall x (Resistive(x) -> Cognizable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Shannah is bionic. Lucy is palpable. Furry things are bionic. Cold things are primordial. Shannah is palpable.", "logic": "\nBionic(shannah)\nPalpable(lucy)\nforall x (Primordial(x) -> Bionic(x))\nforall x (Palpable(x) -> Primordial(x))\n\nPalpable(shannah)\n\nPalpable(shannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Rosemonde is looted. Romonda is bombastic. Furry things are looted. Cold things are faraway. Rosemonde is not round.", "logic": "\nLooted(rosemonde)\nBombastic(romonda)\nforall x (Faraway(x) -> Looted(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Faraway(x))\n\nnot Round(rosemonde)\n\nnot Round(rosemonde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Collins is impassive. Victoria is vermillion. Furry things are impassive. Cold things are resultant. Collins is smart.", "logic": "\nImpassive(collins)\nVermillion(victoria)\nforall x (Resultant(x) -> Impassive(x))\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Resultant(x))\n\nSmart(collins)\n\nSmart(collins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Joel is albinic. Maddalena is appealing. Furry things are albinic. Cold things are cumbrous. Maddalena is not smart.", "logic": "\nAlbinic(joel)\nAppealing(maddalena)\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Albinic(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\n\nnot Smart(maddalena)\n\nnot Smart(maddalena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Roddie is occidental. Adolphe is metaphoric. Furry things are occidental. Cold things are latter. Adolphe is blue.", "logic": "\nOccidental(roddie)\nMetaphoric(adolphe)\nforall x (Latter(x) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Latter(x))\n\nBlue(adolphe)\n\nBlue(adolphe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-698"} {"premises": "Britney is glowing. Britney is endless. Britney is abstract. Britney is berried. Britney is serologic. Libbie is glowing. Libbie is endless. Libbie is puberulent. Libbie is berried. Rory is endless. Nice, berried people are glowing. Red, endless people are abstract. If someone is mitigatory and puberulent then they are berried. All abstract people are mitigatory. If Libbie is mitigatory then Libbie is puberulent. If Rory is endless then Rory is abstract. All mitigatory people are glowing. Nice people are berried. Rory is endless.", "logic": "\nGlowing(britney)\nEndless(britney)\nAbstract(britney)\nBerried(britney)\nSerologic(britney)\nGlowing(libbie)\nEndless(libbie)\nPuberulent(libbie)\nBerried(libbie)\nEndless(rory)\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and Berried(x) -> Glowing(x))\nforall x (Berried(x) and Endless(x) -> Abstract(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Berried(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\nMitigatory(libbie) -> Puberulent(libbie)\nEndless(rory) -> Abstract(rory)\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Glowing(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Berried(x))\n\nEndless(rory)\n\ntherefore Endless(rory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Albertina is fresh. Albertina is handelian. Albertina is prohibited. Albertina is affixal. Albertina is diachronic. Paolo is fresh. Paolo is handelian. Paolo is overhead. Paolo is affixal. Hashim is handelian. Nice, affixal people are fresh. Red, handelian people are prohibited. If someone is chinchy and overhead then they are affixal. All prohibited people are chinchy. If Paolo is chinchy then Paolo is overhead. If Hashim is handelian then Hashim is prohibited. All chinchy people are fresh. Nice people are affixal. Albertina is not fresh.", "logic": "\nFresh(albertina)\nHandelian(albertina)\nProhibited(albertina)\nAffixal(albertina)\nDiachronic(albertina)\nFresh(paolo)\nHandelian(paolo)\nOverhead(paolo)\nAffixal(paolo)\nHandelian(hashim)\nforall x (Chinchy(x) and Affixal(x) -> Fresh(x))\nforall x (Affixal(x) and Handelian(x) -> Prohibited(x))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) and Overhead(x) -> Affixal(x))\nforall x (Prohibited(x) -> Chinchy(x))\nChinchy(paolo) -> Overhead(paolo)\nHandelian(hashim) -> Prohibited(hashim)\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Fresh(x))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Affixal(x))\n\nnot Fresh(albertina)\n\ntherefore Fresh(albertina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Caralie is bisulcate. Caralie is juvenile. Caralie is colour. Caralie is marian. Caralie is unerasable. Bobbie is bisulcate. Bobbie is juvenile. Bobbie is fulfilled. Bobbie is marian. Cesar is juvenile. Nice, marian people are bisulcate. Red, juvenile people are colour. If someone is calamitous and fulfilled then they are marian. All colour people are calamitous. If Bobbie is calamitous then Bobbie is fulfilled. If Cesar is juvenile then Cesar is colour. All calamitous people are bisulcate. Nice people are marian. Bobbie is colour.", "logic": "\nBisulcate(caralie)\nJuvenile(caralie)\nColour(caralie)\nMarian(caralie)\nUnerasable(caralie)\nBisulcate(bobbie)\nJuvenile(bobbie)\nFulfilled(bobbie)\nMarian(bobbie)\nJuvenile(cesar)\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Marian(x) -> Bisulcate(x))\nforall x (Marian(x) and Juvenile(x) -> Colour(x))\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Fulfilled(x) -> Marian(x))\nforall x (Colour(x) -> Calamitous(x))\nCalamitous(bobbie) -> Fulfilled(bobbie)\nJuvenile(cesar) -> Colour(cesar)\nforall x (Calamitous(x) -> Bisulcate(x))\nforall x (Calamitous(x) -> Marian(x))\n\nColour(bobbie)\n\nMarian(bobbie) and Juvenile(bobbie) and forall x (Marian(x) and Juvenile(x) -> Colour(x)) -> therefore Colour(bobbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Katrine is ridged. Katrine is found. Katrine is lyonnaise. Katrine is hermitical. Katrine is unposed. Hermine is ridged. Hermine is found. Hermine is causeless. Hermine is hermitical. Amata is found. Nice, hermitical people are ridged. Red, found people are lyonnaise. If someone is powdered and causeless then they are hermitical. All lyonnaise people are powdered. If Hermine is powdered then Hermine is causeless. If Amata is found then Amata is lyonnaise. All powdered people are ridged. Nice people are hermitical. Amata is not lyonnaise.", "logic": "\nRidged(katrine)\nFound(katrine)\nLyonnaise(katrine)\nHermitical(katrine)\nUnposed(katrine)\nRidged(hermine)\nFound(hermine)\nCauseless(hermine)\nHermitical(hermine)\nFound(amata)\nforall x (Powdered(x) and Hermitical(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Hermitical(x) and Found(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Powdered(x) and Causeless(x) -> Hermitical(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) -> Powdered(x))\nPowdered(hermine) -> Causeless(hermine)\nFound(amata) -> Lyonnaise(amata)\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Hermitical(x))\n\nnot Lyonnaise(amata)\n\nFound(amata) and Found(amata) -> Lyonnaise(amata) -> therefore Lyonnaise(amata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Roderick is lumpish. Roderick is labial. Roderick is initial. Roderick is validatory. Roderick is retracted. Romonda is lumpish. Romonda is labial. Romonda is recessive. Romonda is validatory. Simone is labial. Nice, validatory people are lumpish. Red, labial people are initial. If someone is documented and recessive then they are validatory. All initial people are documented. If Romonda is documented then Romonda is recessive. If Simone is labial then Simone is initial. All documented people are lumpish. Nice people are validatory. Simone is documented.", "logic": "\nLumpish(roderick)\nLabial(roderick)\nInitial(roderick)\nValidatory(roderick)\nRetracted(roderick)\nLumpish(romonda)\nLabial(romonda)\nRecessive(romonda)\nValidatory(romonda)\nLabial(simone)\nforall x (Documented(x) and Validatory(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Validatory(x) and Labial(x) -> Initial(x))\nforall x (Documented(x) and Recessive(x) -> Validatory(x))\nforall x (Initial(x) -> Documented(x))\nDocumented(romonda) -> Recessive(romonda)\nLabial(simone) -> Initial(simone)\nforall x (Documented(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Documented(x) -> Validatory(x))\n\nDocumented(simone)\n\nLabial(simone) and Labial(simone) -> Initial(simone) -> therefore Initial(simone) Initial(simone) and forall x (Initial(x) -> Documented(x)) -> therefore Documented(simone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Shurlocke is positivist. Shurlocke is backhanded. Shurlocke is biparous. Shurlocke is reedlike. Shurlocke is nubby. Jamey is positivist. Jamey is backhanded. Jamey is twinning. Jamey is reedlike. Secunda is backhanded. Nice, reedlike people are positivist. Red, backhanded people are biparous. If someone is statuesque and twinning then they are reedlike. All biparous people are statuesque. If Jamey is statuesque then Jamey is twinning. If Secunda is backhanded then Secunda is biparous. All statuesque people are positivist. Nice people are reedlike. Secunda is not statuesque.", "logic": "\nPositivist(shurlocke)\nBackhanded(shurlocke)\nBiparous(shurlocke)\nReedlike(shurlocke)\nNubby(shurlocke)\nPositivist(jamey)\nBackhanded(jamey)\nTwinning(jamey)\nReedlike(jamey)\nBackhanded(secunda)\nforall x (Statuesque(x) and Reedlike(x) -> Positivist(x))\nforall x (Reedlike(x) and Backhanded(x) -> Biparous(x))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) and Twinning(x) -> Reedlike(x))\nforall x (Biparous(x) -> Statuesque(x))\nStatuesque(jamey) -> Twinning(jamey)\nBackhanded(secunda) -> Biparous(secunda)\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> Positivist(x))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> Reedlike(x))\n\nnot Statuesque(secunda)\n\nBackhanded(secunda) and Backhanded(secunda) -> Biparous(secunda) -> therefore Biparous(secunda) Biparous(secunda) and forall x (Biparous(x) -> Statuesque(x)) -> therefore Statuesque(secunda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Beverlie is hottish. Beverlie is luxe. Beverlie is breeding. Beverlie is debonnaire. Beverlie is seasonal. Virgie is hottish. Virgie is luxe. Virgie is tyrannic. Virgie is debonnaire. Flint is luxe. Nice, debonnaire people are hottish. Red, luxe people are breeding. If someone is postwar and tyrannic then they are debonnaire. All breeding people are postwar. If Virgie is postwar then Virgie is tyrannic. If Flint is luxe then Flint is breeding. All postwar people are hottish. Nice people are debonnaire. Virgie is not seasonal.", "logic": "\nHottish(beverlie)\nLuxe(beverlie)\nBreeding(beverlie)\nDebonnaire(beverlie)\nSeasonal(beverlie)\nHottish(virgie)\nLuxe(virgie)\nTyrannic(virgie)\nDebonnaire(virgie)\nLuxe(flint)\nforall x (Postwar(x) and Debonnaire(x) -> Hottish(x))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and Luxe(x) -> Breeding(x))\nforall x (Postwar(x) and Tyrannic(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\nforall x (Breeding(x) -> Postwar(x))\nPostwar(virgie) -> Tyrannic(virgie)\nLuxe(flint) -> Breeding(flint)\nforall x (Postwar(x) -> Hottish(x))\nforall x (Postwar(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\n\nnot Seasonal(virgie)\n\nnot Seasonal(virgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Adrick is antibiotic. Adrick is shaded. Adrick is implanted. Adrick is guileless. Adrick is striking. Charlotte is antibiotic. Charlotte is shaded. Charlotte is moralistic. Charlotte is guileless. Linnie is shaded. Nice, guileless people are antibiotic. Red, shaded people are implanted. If someone is awned and moralistic then they are guileless. All implanted people are awned. If Charlotte is awned then Charlotte is moralistic. If Linnie is shaded then Linnie is implanted. All awned people are antibiotic. Nice people are guileless. Linnie is moralistic.", "logic": "\nAntibiotic(adrick)\nShaded(adrick)\nImplanted(adrick)\nGuileless(adrick)\nStriking(adrick)\nAntibiotic(charlotte)\nShaded(charlotte)\nMoralistic(charlotte)\nGuileless(charlotte)\nShaded(linnie)\nforall x (Awned(x) and Guileless(x) -> Antibiotic(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) and Shaded(x) -> Implanted(x))\nforall x (Awned(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Implanted(x) -> Awned(x))\nAwned(charlotte) -> Moralistic(charlotte)\nShaded(linnie) -> Implanted(linnie)\nforall x (Awned(x) -> Antibiotic(x))\nforall x (Awned(x) -> Guileless(x))\n\nMoralistic(linnie)\n\nMoralistic(linnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Yanaton is historical. Yanaton is housebound. Yanaton is attempted. Yanaton is congruous. Yanaton is marbleized. Rhea is historical. Rhea is housebound. Rhea is extrinsic. Rhea is congruous. Conan is housebound. Nice, congruous people are historical. Red, housebound people are attempted. If someone is mazed and extrinsic then they are congruous. All attempted people are mazed. If Rhea is mazed then Rhea is extrinsic. If Conan is housebound then Conan is attempted. All mazed people are historical. Nice people are congruous. Conan is not marbleized.", "logic": "\nHistorical(yanaton)\nHousebound(yanaton)\nAttempted(yanaton)\nCongruous(yanaton)\nMarbleized(yanaton)\nHistorical(rhea)\nHousebound(rhea)\nExtrinsic(rhea)\nCongruous(rhea)\nHousebound(conan)\nforall x (Mazed(x) and Congruous(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) and Housebound(x) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Mazed(x) and Extrinsic(x) -> Congruous(x))\nforall x (Attempted(x) -> Mazed(x))\nMazed(rhea) -> Extrinsic(rhea)\nHousebound(conan) -> Attempted(conan)\nforall x (Mazed(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Mazed(x) -> Congruous(x))\n\nnot Marbleized(conan)\n\nnot Marbleized(conan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "Ardyth is skint. Ardyth is whitish. Ardyth is sentential. Ardyth is admirable. Ardyth is gibbose. Didi is skint. Didi is whitish. Didi is boughed. Didi is admirable. Danella is whitish. Nice, admirable people are skint. Red, whitish people are sentential. If someone is doped and boughed then they are admirable. All sentential people are doped. If Didi is doped then Didi is boughed. If Danella is whitish then Danella is sentential. All doped people are skint. Nice people are admirable. Ardyth is boughed.", "logic": "\nSkint(ardyth)\nWhitish(ardyth)\nSentential(ardyth)\nAdmirable(ardyth)\nGibbose(ardyth)\nSkint(didi)\nWhitish(didi)\nBoughed(didi)\nAdmirable(didi)\nWhitish(danella)\nforall x (Doped(x) and Admirable(x) -> Skint(x))\nforall x (Admirable(x) and Whitish(x) -> Sentential(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) and Boughed(x) -> Admirable(x))\nforall x (Sentential(x) -> Doped(x))\nDoped(didi) -> Boughed(didi)\nWhitish(danella) -> Sentential(danella)\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Skint(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Admirable(x))\n\nBoughed(ardyth)\n\nBoughed(ardyth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1735"} {"premises": "The kelsy miff the brena. The kelsy proctor the tildie. The tildie miff the cherice. The tildie is growing. The tildie proctor the kelsy. The brena miff the tildie. The brena miff the cherice. The brena is growing. The brena stoop the cherice. The cherice miff the tildie. The cherice is vitreous. The cherice is taoist. The cherice is growing. The cherice stoop the kelsy. The cherice proctor the kelsy. If something is growing and it stoop the kelsy then the kelsy is growing. If something is growing then it proctor the cherice. The cherice is growing.", "logic": "\nMiff(kelsy, brena)\nProctor(kelsy, tildie)\nMiff(tildie, cherice)\nGrowing(tildie)\nProctor(tildie, kelsy)\nMiff(brena, tildie)\nMiff(brena, cherice)\nGrowing(brena)\nStoop(brena, cherice)\nMiff(cherice, tildie)\nVitreous(cherice)\nTaoist(cherice)\nGrowing(cherice)\nStoop(cherice, kelsy)\nProctor(cherice, kelsy)\nforall x (Growing(x) and Stoop(x, kelsy) -> Growing(kelsy))\nforall x (Growing(x) -> Proctor(x, cherice))\n\nGrowing(cherice)\n\ntherefore Growing(cherice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The skipton connive the lolande. The skipton requite the anurag. The anurag connive the faydra. The anurag is latticed. The anurag requite the skipton. The lolande connive the anurag. The lolande connive the faydra. The lolande is latticed. The lolande disincline the faydra. The faydra connive the anurag. The faydra is unlearned. The faydra is mournful. The faydra is latticed. The faydra disincline the skipton. The faydra requite the skipton. If something is latticed and it disincline the skipton then the skipton is latticed. If something is latticed then it requite the faydra. The skipton does not visit the anurag.", "logic": "\nConnive(skipton, lolande)\nRequite(skipton, anurag)\nConnive(anurag, faydra)\nLatticed(anurag)\nRequite(anurag, skipton)\nConnive(lolande, anurag)\nConnive(lolande, faydra)\nLatticed(lolande)\nDisincline(lolande, faydra)\nConnive(faydra, anurag)\nUnlearned(faydra)\nMournful(faydra)\nLatticed(faydra)\nDisincline(faydra, skipton)\nRequite(faydra, skipton)\nforall x (Latticed(x) and Disincline(x, skipton) -> Latticed(skipton))\nforall x (Latticed(x) -> Requite(x, faydra))\n\nnot Requite(skipton, anurag)\n\ntherefore Requite(skipton, anurag)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The sophia foam the wye. The sophia obliterate the oralle. The oralle foam the kasey. The oralle is unsealed. The oralle obliterate the sophia. The wye foam the oralle. The wye foam the kasey. The wye is unsealed. The wye sublime the kasey. The kasey foam the oralle. The kasey is sissified. The kasey is steaming. The kasey is unsealed. The kasey sublime the sophia. The kasey obliterate the sophia. If something is unsealed and it sublime the sophia then the sophia is unsealed. If something is unsealed then it obliterate the kasey. The wye obliterate the kasey.", "logic": "\nFoam(sophia, wye)\nObliterate(sophia, oralle)\nFoam(oralle, kasey)\nUnsealed(oralle)\nObliterate(oralle, sophia)\nFoam(wye, oralle)\nFoam(wye, kasey)\nUnsealed(wye)\nSublime(wye, kasey)\nFoam(kasey, oralle)\nSissified(kasey)\nSteaming(kasey)\nUnsealed(kasey)\nSublime(kasey, sophia)\nObliterate(kasey, sophia)\nforall x (Unsealed(x) and Sublime(x, sophia) -> Unsealed(sophia))\nforall x (Unsealed(x) -> Obliterate(x, kasey))\n\nObliterate(wye, kasey)\n\nUnsealed(wye) and forall x (Unsealed(x) -> Obliterate(x, kasey)) -> therefore Obliterate(wye, kasey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The ely skyrocket the claude. The ely foal the amalia. The amalia skyrocket the trevor. The amalia is composed. The amalia foal the ely. The claude skyrocket the amalia. The claude skyrocket the trevor. The claude is composed. The claude sugarcoat the trevor. The trevor skyrocket the amalia. The trevor is hectic. The trevor is perfected. The trevor is composed. The trevor sugarcoat the ely. The trevor foal the ely. If something is composed and it sugarcoat the ely then the ely is composed. If something is composed then it foal the trevor. The trevor does not visit the trevor.", "logic": "\nSkyrocket(ely, claude)\nFoal(ely, amalia)\nSkyrocket(amalia, trevor)\nComposed(amalia)\nFoal(amalia, ely)\nSkyrocket(claude, amalia)\nSkyrocket(claude, trevor)\nComposed(claude)\nSugarcoat(claude, trevor)\nSkyrocket(trevor, amalia)\nHectic(trevor)\nPerfected(trevor)\nComposed(trevor)\nSugarcoat(trevor, ely)\nFoal(trevor, ely)\nforall x (Composed(x) and Sugarcoat(x, ely) -> Composed(ely))\nforall x (Composed(x) -> Foal(x, trevor))\n\nnot Foal(trevor, trevor)\n\nComposed(trevor) and forall x (Composed(x) -> Foal(x, trevor)) -> therefore Foal(trevor, trevor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The barnard travail the eustacia. The barnard moil the hendrik. The hendrik travail the rosanna. The hendrik is main. The hendrik moil the barnard. The eustacia travail the hendrik. The eustacia travail the rosanna. The eustacia is main. The eustacia deem the rosanna. The rosanna travail the hendrik. The rosanna is insensible. The rosanna is rackety. The rosanna is main. The rosanna deem the barnard. The rosanna moil the barnard. If something is main and it deem the barnard then the barnard is main. If something is main then it moil the rosanna. The barnard moil the rosanna.", "logic": "\nTravail(barnard, eustacia)\nMoil(barnard, hendrik)\nTravail(hendrik, rosanna)\nMain(hendrik)\nMoil(hendrik, barnard)\nTravail(eustacia, hendrik)\nTravail(eustacia, rosanna)\nMain(eustacia)\nDeem(eustacia, rosanna)\nTravail(rosanna, hendrik)\nInsensible(rosanna)\nRackety(rosanna)\nMain(rosanna)\nDeem(rosanna, barnard)\nMoil(rosanna, barnard)\nforall x (Main(x) and Deem(x, barnard) -> Main(barnard))\nforall x (Main(x) -> Moil(x, rosanna))\n\nMoil(barnard, rosanna)\n\nMain(rosanna) and Deem(rosanna, barnard) and forall x (Main(x) and Deem(x, barnard) -> Main(barnard)) -> therefore Main(barnard) Main(barnard) and forall x (Main(x) -> Moil(x, rosanna)) -> therefore Moil(barnard, rosanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The nevil capacitate the dominique. The nevil macerate the zippy. The zippy capacitate the irving. The zippy is tentacled. The zippy macerate the nevil. The dominique capacitate the zippy. The dominique capacitate the irving. The dominique is tentacled. The dominique babbitt the irving. The irving capacitate the zippy. The irving is threepenny. The irving is eutrophic. The irving is tentacled. The irving babbitt the nevil. The irving macerate the nevil. If something is tentacled and it babbitt the nevil then the nevil is tentacled. If something is tentacled then it macerate the irving. The nevil does not visit the irving.", "logic": "\nCapacitate(nevil, dominique)\nMacerate(nevil, zippy)\nCapacitate(zippy, irving)\nTentacled(zippy)\nMacerate(zippy, nevil)\nCapacitate(dominique, zippy)\nCapacitate(dominique, irving)\nTentacled(dominique)\nBabbitt(dominique, irving)\nCapacitate(irving, zippy)\nThreepenny(irving)\nEutrophic(irving)\nTentacled(irving)\nBabbitt(irving, nevil)\nMacerate(irving, nevil)\nforall x (Tentacled(x) and Babbitt(x, nevil) -> Tentacled(nevil))\nforall x (Tentacled(x) -> Macerate(x, irving))\n\nnot Macerate(nevil, irving)\n\nTentacled(irving) and Babbitt(irving, nevil) and forall x (Tentacled(x) and Babbitt(x, nevil) -> Tentacled(nevil)) -> therefore Tentacled(nevil) Tentacled(nevil) and forall x (Tentacled(x) -> Macerate(x, irving)) -> therefore Macerate(nevil, irving)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The rickey chirr the letisha. The rickey ionise the wyatt. The wyatt chirr the brian. The wyatt is donnean. The wyatt ionise the rickey. The letisha chirr the wyatt. The letisha chirr the brian. The letisha is donnean. The letisha bleach the brian. The brian chirr the wyatt. The brian is sixth. The brian is churlish. The brian is donnean. The brian bleach the rickey. The brian ionise the rickey. If something is donnean and it bleach the rickey then the rickey is donnean. If something is donnean then it ionise the brian. The letisha does not visit the rickey.", "logic": "\nChirr(rickey, letisha)\nIonise(rickey, wyatt)\nChirr(wyatt, brian)\nDonnean(wyatt)\nIonise(wyatt, rickey)\nChirr(letisha, wyatt)\nChirr(letisha, brian)\nDonnean(letisha)\nBleach(letisha, brian)\nChirr(brian, wyatt)\nSixth(brian)\nChurlish(brian)\nDonnean(brian)\nBleach(brian, rickey)\nIonise(brian, rickey)\nforall x (Donnean(x) and Bleach(x, rickey) -> Donnean(rickey))\nforall x (Donnean(x) -> Ionise(x, brian))\n\nnot Ionise(letisha, rickey)\n\nnot Ionise(letisha, rickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The don novate the witty. The don eyewitness the silvano. The silvano novate the beth. The silvano is okay. The silvano eyewitness the don. The witty novate the silvano. The witty novate the beth. The witty is okay. The witty offload the beth. The beth novate the silvano. The beth is jain. The beth is loathsome. The beth is okay. The beth offload the don. The beth eyewitness the don. If something is okay and it offload the don then the don is okay. If something is okay then it eyewitness the beth. The beth novate the beth.", "logic": "\nNovate(don, witty)\nEyewitness(don, silvano)\nNovate(silvano, beth)\nOkay(silvano)\nEyewitness(silvano, don)\nNovate(witty, silvano)\nNovate(witty, beth)\nOkay(witty)\nOffload(witty, beth)\nNovate(beth, silvano)\nJain(beth)\nLoathsome(beth)\nOkay(beth)\nOffload(beth, don)\nEyewitness(beth, don)\nforall x (Okay(x) and Offload(x, don) -> Okay(don))\nforall x (Okay(x) -> Eyewitness(x, beth))\n\nNovate(beth, beth)\n\nNovate(beth, beth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The amabelle hinge the reggy. The amabelle launch the patricio. The patricio hinge the shirlene. The patricio is martial. The patricio launch the amabelle. The reggy hinge the patricio. The reggy hinge the shirlene. The reggy is martial. The reggy dangle the shirlene. The shirlene hinge the patricio. The shirlene is apparent. The shirlene is imposing. The shirlene is martial. The shirlene dangle the amabelle. The shirlene launch the amabelle. If something is martial and it dangle the amabelle then the amabelle is martial. If something is martial then it launch the shirlene. The amabelle does not chase the shirlene.", "logic": "\nHinge(amabelle, reggy)\nLaunch(amabelle, patricio)\nHinge(patricio, shirlene)\nMartial(patricio)\nLaunch(patricio, amabelle)\nHinge(reggy, patricio)\nHinge(reggy, shirlene)\nMartial(reggy)\nDangle(reggy, shirlene)\nHinge(shirlene, patricio)\nApparent(shirlene)\nImposing(shirlene)\nMartial(shirlene)\nDangle(shirlene, amabelle)\nLaunch(shirlene, amabelle)\nforall x (Martial(x) and Dangle(x, amabelle) -> Martial(amabelle))\nforall x (Martial(x) -> Launch(x, shirlene))\n\nnot Hinge(amabelle, shirlene)\n\nnot Hinge(amabelle, shirlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The riki pressurize the nidia. The riki subtitle the eustacia. The eustacia pressurize the chevy. The eustacia is squab. The eustacia subtitle the riki. The nidia pressurize the eustacia. The nidia pressurize the chevy. The nidia is squab. The nidia puzzle the chevy. The chevy pressurize the eustacia. The chevy is rightish. The chevy is puffy. The chevy is squab. The chevy puzzle the riki. The chevy subtitle the riki. If something is squab and it puzzle the riki then the riki is squab. If something is squab then it subtitle the chevy. The nidia subtitle the eustacia.", "logic": "\nPressurize(riki, nidia)\nSubtitle(riki, eustacia)\nPressurize(eustacia, chevy)\nSquab(eustacia)\nSubtitle(eustacia, riki)\nPressurize(nidia, eustacia)\nPressurize(nidia, chevy)\nSquab(nidia)\nPuzzle(nidia, chevy)\nPressurize(chevy, eustacia)\nRightish(chevy)\nPuffy(chevy)\nSquab(chevy)\nPuzzle(chevy, riki)\nSubtitle(chevy, riki)\nforall x (Squab(x) and Puzzle(x, riki) -> Squab(riki))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Subtitle(x, chevy))\n\nSubtitle(nidia, eustacia)\n\nSubtitle(nidia, eustacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The cam harken the lin. The cam homestead the nev. The nev harken the raye. The nev is attested. The nev homestead the cam. The lin harken the nev. The lin harken the raye. The lin is attested. The lin cronk the raye. The raye harken the nev. The raye is inchoative. The raye is southwest. The raye is attested. The raye cronk the cam. The raye homestead the cam. If something is attested and it cronk the cam then the cam is attested. If something is attested then it homestead the raye. The lin is not young.", "logic": "\nHarken(cam, lin)\nHomestead(cam, nev)\nHarken(nev, raye)\nAttested(nev)\nHomestead(nev, cam)\nHarken(lin, nev)\nHarken(lin, raye)\nAttested(lin)\nCronk(lin, raye)\nHarken(raye, nev)\nInchoative(raye)\nSouthwest(raye)\nAttested(raye)\nCronk(raye, cam)\nHomestead(raye, cam)\nforall x (Attested(x) and Cronk(x, cam) -> Attested(cam))\nforall x (Attested(x) -> Homestead(x, raye))\n\nnot Young(lin)\n\nnot Young(lin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "The chloris mould the dionysus. The chloris grok the johan. The johan mould the rosella. The johan is hemostatic. The johan grok the chloris. The dionysus mould the johan. The dionysus mould the rosella. The dionysus is hemostatic. The dionysus obey the rosella. The rosella mould the johan. The rosella is bleached. The rosella is descendent. The rosella is hemostatic. The rosella obey the chloris. The rosella grok the chloris. If something is hemostatic and it obey the chloris then the chloris is hemostatic. If something is hemostatic then it grok the rosella. The rosella obey the johan.", "logic": "\nMould(chloris, dionysus)\nGrok(chloris, johan)\nMould(johan, rosella)\nHemostatic(johan)\nGrok(johan, chloris)\nMould(dionysus, johan)\nMould(dionysus, rosella)\nHemostatic(dionysus)\nObey(dionysus, rosella)\nMould(rosella, johan)\nBleached(rosella)\nDescendent(rosella)\nHemostatic(rosella)\nObey(rosella, chloris)\nGrok(rosella, chloris)\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) and Obey(x, chloris) -> Hemostatic(chloris))\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) -> Grok(x, rosella))\n\nObey(rosella, johan)\n\nObey(rosella, johan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1567"} {"premises": "Sabra is not throated. Sabra is shingly. Sabra is olden. Sabra is earlier. Sabra is antarctic. Clemence is throated. Clemence is tentative. Clemence is olden. Clemence is earlier. Jules is throated. Jules is shingly. Jules is not tentative. Jules is olden. Jules is not antarctic. Jules is not strange. If Sabra is antarctic then Sabra is strange. All shingly, strange people are not tentative. All throated people are earlier. Sabra is earlier.", "logic": "\nnot Throated(sabra)\nShingly(sabra)\nOlden(sabra)\nEarlier(sabra)\nAntarctic(sabra)\nThroated(clemence)\nTentative(clemence)\nOlden(clemence)\nEarlier(clemence)\nThroated(jules)\nShingly(jules)\nnot Tentative(jules)\nOlden(jules)\nnot Antarctic(jules)\nnot Strange(jules)\nAntarctic(sabra) -> Strange(sabra)\nforall x (Shingly(x) and Strange(x) -> not Tentative(x))\nforall x (Throated(x) -> Earlier(x))\n\nEarlier(sabra)\n\ntherefore Earlier(sabra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Mamie is not measly. Mamie is unsuited. Mamie is similar. Mamie is restive. Mamie is vernal. Friedrick is measly. Friedrick is vivacious. Friedrick is similar. Friedrick is restive. Abdel is measly. Abdel is unsuited. Abdel is not vivacious. Abdel is similar. Abdel is not vernal. Abdel is not cassocked. If Mamie is vernal then Mamie is cassocked. All unsuited, cassocked people are not vivacious. All measly people are restive. Abdel is vernal.", "logic": "\nnot Measly(mamie)\nUnsuited(mamie)\nSimilar(mamie)\nRestive(mamie)\nVernal(mamie)\nMeasly(friedrick)\nVivacious(friedrick)\nSimilar(friedrick)\nRestive(friedrick)\nMeasly(abdel)\nUnsuited(abdel)\nnot Vivacious(abdel)\nSimilar(abdel)\nnot Vernal(abdel)\nnot Cassocked(abdel)\nVernal(mamie) -> Cassocked(mamie)\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Cassocked(x) -> not Vivacious(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) -> Restive(x))\n\nVernal(abdel)\n\ntherefore not Vernal(abdel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Eula is not joined. Eula is statant. Eula is unflawed. Eula is anaplastic. Eula is ceruminous. Fayina is joined. Fayina is idolized. Fayina is unflawed. Fayina is anaplastic. Nicolina is joined. Nicolina is statant. Nicolina is not idolized. Nicolina is unflawed. Nicolina is not ceruminous. Nicolina is not asserted. If Eula is ceruminous then Eula is asserted. All statant, asserted people are not idolized. All joined people are anaplastic. Eula is asserted.", "logic": "\nnot Joined(eula)\nStatant(eula)\nUnflawed(eula)\nAnaplastic(eula)\nCeruminous(eula)\nJoined(fayina)\nIdolized(fayina)\nUnflawed(fayina)\nAnaplastic(fayina)\nJoined(nicolina)\nStatant(nicolina)\nnot Idolized(nicolina)\nUnflawed(nicolina)\nnot Ceruminous(nicolina)\nnot Asserted(nicolina)\nCeruminous(eula) -> Asserted(eula)\nforall x (Statant(x) and Asserted(x) -> not Idolized(x))\nforall x (Joined(x) -> Anaplastic(x))\n\nAsserted(eula)\n\nCeruminous(eula) and Ceruminous(eula) -> Asserted(eula) -> therefore Asserted(eula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Chen is not blocked. Chen is corneous. Chen is corky. Chen is knightly. Chen is braggart. Merci is blocked. Merci is shifting. Merci is corky. Merci is knightly. Frederik is blocked. Frederik is corneous. Frederik is not shifting. Frederik is corky. Frederik is not braggart. Frederik is not singhalese. If Chen is braggart then Chen is singhalese. All corneous, singhalese people are not shifting. All blocked people are knightly. Frederik is not knightly.", "logic": "\nnot Blocked(chen)\nCorneous(chen)\nCorky(chen)\nKnightly(chen)\nBraggart(chen)\nBlocked(merci)\nShifting(merci)\nCorky(merci)\nKnightly(merci)\nBlocked(frederik)\nCorneous(frederik)\nnot Shifting(frederik)\nCorky(frederik)\nnot Braggart(frederik)\nnot Singhalese(frederik)\nBraggart(chen) -> Singhalese(chen)\nforall x (Corneous(x) and Singhalese(x) -> not Shifting(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Knightly(x))\n\nnot Knightly(frederik)\n\nBlocked(frederik) and forall x (Blocked(x) -> Knightly(x)) -> therefore Knightly(frederik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Kassi is not snuggled. Kassi is apogametic. Kassi is adscripted. Kassi is world. Kassi is bowelless. Irina is snuggled. Irina is unobliging. Irina is adscripted. Irina is world. Cate is snuggled. Cate is apogametic. Cate is not unobliging. Cate is adscripted. Cate is not bowelless. Cate is not ferine. If Kassi is bowelless then Kassi is ferine. All apogametic, ferine people are not unobliging. All snuggled people are world. Kassi is not unobliging.", "logic": "\nnot Snuggled(kassi)\nApogametic(kassi)\nAdscripted(kassi)\nWorld(kassi)\nBowelless(kassi)\nSnuggled(irina)\nUnobliging(irina)\nAdscripted(irina)\nWorld(irina)\nSnuggled(cate)\nApogametic(cate)\nnot Unobliging(cate)\nAdscripted(cate)\nnot Bowelless(cate)\nnot Ferine(cate)\nBowelless(kassi) -> Ferine(kassi)\nforall x (Apogametic(x) and Ferine(x) -> not Unobliging(x))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> World(x))\n\nnot Unobliging(kassi)\n\nBowelless(kassi) and Bowelless(kassi) -> Ferine(kassi) -> therefore Ferine(kassi) Apogametic(kassi) and Ferine(kassi) and forall x (Apogametic(x) and Ferine(x) -> not Unobliging(x)) -> therefore not Unobliging(kassi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Dulcine is not groundless. Dulcine is naughty. Dulcine is tense. Dulcine is paneled. Dulcine is sober. Art is groundless. Art is alchemic. Art is tense. Art is paneled. Anetta is groundless. Anetta is naughty. Anetta is not alchemic. Anetta is tense. Anetta is not sober. Anetta is not shrunken. If Dulcine is sober then Dulcine is shrunken. All naughty, shrunken people are not alchemic. All groundless people are paneled. Dulcine is alchemic.", "logic": "\nnot Groundless(dulcine)\nNaughty(dulcine)\nTense(dulcine)\nPaneled(dulcine)\nSober(dulcine)\nGroundless(art)\nAlchemic(art)\nTense(art)\nPaneled(art)\nGroundless(anetta)\nNaughty(anetta)\nnot Alchemic(anetta)\nTense(anetta)\nnot Sober(anetta)\nnot Shrunken(anetta)\nSober(dulcine) -> Shrunken(dulcine)\nforall x (Naughty(x) and Shrunken(x) -> not Alchemic(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Paneled(x))\n\nAlchemic(dulcine)\n\nSober(dulcine) and Sober(dulcine) -> Shrunken(dulcine) -> therefore Shrunken(dulcine) Naughty(dulcine) and Shrunken(dulcine) and forall x (Naughty(x) and Shrunken(x) -> not Alchemic(x)) -> therefore not Alchemic(dulcine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Perceval is not chassidic. Perceval is observing. Perceval is bleak. Perceval is ectodermal. Perceval is close. Lani is chassidic. Lani is suboceanic. Lani is bleak. Lani is ectodermal. Rand is chassidic. Rand is observing. Rand is not suboceanic. Rand is bleak. Rand is not close. Rand is not unsealed. If Perceval is close then Perceval is unsealed. All observing, unsealed people are not suboceanic. All chassidic people are ectodermal. Lani is not close.", "logic": "\nnot Chassidic(perceval)\nObserving(perceval)\nBleak(perceval)\nEctodermal(perceval)\nClose(perceval)\nChassidic(lani)\nSuboceanic(lani)\nBleak(lani)\nEctodermal(lani)\nChassidic(rand)\nObserving(rand)\nnot Suboceanic(rand)\nBleak(rand)\nnot Close(rand)\nnot Unsealed(rand)\nClose(perceval) -> Unsealed(perceval)\nforall x (Observing(x) and Unsealed(x) -> not Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\n\nnot Close(lani)\n\nnot Close(lani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Joann is not undersea. Joann is archetypal. Joann is medieval. Joann is synoptical. Joann is aoristic. Antoine is undersea. Antoine is newsworthy. Antoine is medieval. Antoine is synoptical. Michelina is undersea. Michelina is archetypal. Michelina is not newsworthy. Michelina is medieval. Michelina is not aoristic. Michelina is not frowzy. If Joann is aoristic then Joann is frowzy. All archetypal, frowzy people are not newsworthy. All undersea people are synoptical. Antoine is archetypal.", "logic": "\nnot Undersea(joann)\nArchetypal(joann)\nMedieval(joann)\nSynoptical(joann)\nAoristic(joann)\nUndersea(antoine)\nNewsworthy(antoine)\nMedieval(antoine)\nSynoptical(antoine)\nUndersea(michelina)\nArchetypal(michelina)\nnot Newsworthy(michelina)\nMedieval(michelina)\nnot Aoristic(michelina)\nnot Frowzy(michelina)\nAoristic(joann) -> Frowzy(joann)\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and Frowzy(x) -> not Newsworthy(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Synoptical(x))\n\nArchetypal(antoine)\n\nArchetypal(antoine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1189"} {"premises": "Lou is slapdash. Lou is nude. Lou is fijian. Lou is forfeit. Henri is slapdash. Henri is nude. Henri is meandering. Henri is mobbish. Liorah is slapdash. Liorah is nude. Liorah is fijian. Liorah is meandering. Liorah is forfeit. Liorah is mobbish. Liorah is delphic. If Liorah is slapdash and Liorah is nude then Liorah is meandering. Cold, meandering things are delphic. If something is fijian then it is meandering. Liorah is mobbish.", "logic": "\nSlapdash(lou)\nNude(lou)\nFijian(lou)\nForfeit(lou)\nSlapdash(henri)\nNude(henri)\nMeandering(henri)\nMobbish(henri)\nSlapdash(liorah)\nNude(liorah)\nFijian(liorah)\nMeandering(liorah)\nForfeit(liorah)\nMobbish(liorah)\nDelphic(liorah)\nSlapdash(liorah) and Nude(liorah) -> Meandering(liorah)\nforall x (Fijian(x) and Meandering(x) -> Delphic(x))\nforall x (Fijian(x) -> Meandering(x))\n\nMobbish(liorah)\n\ntherefore Mobbish(liorah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Armando is exuvial. Armando is apogamic. Armando is humpbacked. Armando is deuced. Agamemnon is exuvial. Agamemnon is apogamic. Agamemnon is raised. Agamemnon is maverick. Antonina is exuvial. Antonina is apogamic. Antonina is humpbacked. Antonina is raised. Antonina is deuced. Antonina is maverick. Antonina is credible. If Antonina is exuvial and Antonina is apogamic then Antonina is raised. Cold, raised things are credible. If something is humpbacked then it is raised. Armando is not apogamic.", "logic": "\nExuvial(armando)\nApogamic(armando)\nHumpbacked(armando)\nDeuced(armando)\nExuvial(agamemnon)\nApogamic(agamemnon)\nRaised(agamemnon)\nMaverick(agamemnon)\nExuvial(antonina)\nApogamic(antonina)\nHumpbacked(antonina)\nRaised(antonina)\nDeuced(antonina)\nMaverick(antonina)\nCredible(antonina)\nExuvial(antonina) and Apogamic(antonina) -> Raised(antonina)\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) and Raised(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Raised(x))\n\nnot Apogamic(armando)\n\ntherefore Apogamic(armando)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Lorrin is mystifying. Lorrin is hygienical. Lorrin is succulent. Lorrin is southerly. Josey is mystifying. Josey is hygienical. Josey is rotatable. Josey is dicey. Melodie is mystifying. Melodie is hygienical. Melodie is succulent. Melodie is rotatable. Melodie is southerly. Melodie is dicey. Melodie is awesome. If Melodie is mystifying and Melodie is hygienical then Melodie is rotatable. Cold, rotatable things are awesome. If something is succulent then it is rotatable. Lorrin is rotatable.", "logic": "\nMystifying(lorrin)\nHygienical(lorrin)\nSucculent(lorrin)\nSoutherly(lorrin)\nMystifying(josey)\nHygienical(josey)\nRotatable(josey)\nDicey(josey)\nMystifying(melodie)\nHygienical(melodie)\nSucculent(melodie)\nRotatable(melodie)\nSoutherly(melodie)\nDicey(melodie)\nAwesome(melodie)\nMystifying(melodie) and Hygienical(melodie) -> Rotatable(melodie)\nforall x (Succulent(x) and Rotatable(x) -> Awesome(x))\nforall x (Succulent(x) -> Rotatable(x))\n\nRotatable(lorrin)\n\nSucculent(lorrin) and forall x (Succulent(x) -> Rotatable(x)) -> therefore Rotatable(lorrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Karry is unbarreled. Karry is congestive. Karry is dear. Karry is ataraxic. Marysa is unbarreled. Marysa is congestive. Marysa is cadastral. Marysa is arco. Venus is unbarreled. Venus is congestive. Venus is dear. Venus is cadastral. Venus is ataraxic. Venus is arco. Venus is inheriting. If Venus is unbarreled and Venus is congestive then Venus is cadastral. Cold, cadastral things are inheriting. If something is dear then it is cadastral. Karry is not cadastral.", "logic": "\nUnbarreled(karry)\nCongestive(karry)\nDear(karry)\nAtaraxic(karry)\nUnbarreled(marysa)\nCongestive(marysa)\nCadastral(marysa)\nArco(marysa)\nUnbarreled(venus)\nCongestive(venus)\nDear(venus)\nCadastral(venus)\nAtaraxic(venus)\nArco(venus)\nInheriting(venus)\nUnbarreled(venus) and Congestive(venus) -> Cadastral(venus)\nforall x (Dear(x) and Cadastral(x) -> Inheriting(x))\nforall x (Dear(x) -> Cadastral(x))\n\nnot Cadastral(karry)\n\nDear(karry) and forall x (Dear(x) -> Cadastral(x)) -> therefore Cadastral(karry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Lyndy is affine. Lyndy is spatulate. Lyndy is jittery. Lyndy is fuddled. Elton is affine. Elton is spatulate. Elton is unwrapped. Elton is devilish. Nick is affine. Nick is spatulate. Nick is jittery. Nick is unwrapped. Nick is fuddled. Nick is devilish. Nick is sanious. If Nick is affine and Nick is spatulate then Nick is unwrapped. Cold, unwrapped things are sanious. If something is jittery then it is unwrapped. Lyndy is sanious.", "logic": "\nAffine(lyndy)\nSpatulate(lyndy)\nJittery(lyndy)\nFuddled(lyndy)\nAffine(elton)\nSpatulate(elton)\nUnwrapped(elton)\nDevilish(elton)\nAffine(nick)\nSpatulate(nick)\nJittery(nick)\nUnwrapped(nick)\nFuddled(nick)\nDevilish(nick)\nSanious(nick)\nAffine(nick) and Spatulate(nick) -> Unwrapped(nick)\nforall x (Jittery(x) and Unwrapped(x) -> Sanious(x))\nforall x (Jittery(x) -> Unwrapped(x))\n\nSanious(lyndy)\n\nJittery(lyndy) and forall x (Jittery(x) -> Unwrapped(x)) -> therefore Unwrapped(lyndy) Jittery(lyndy) and Unwrapped(lyndy) and forall x (Jittery(x) and Unwrapped(x) -> Sanious(x)) -> therefore Sanious(lyndy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Lucilia is loveless. Lucilia is foamy. Lucilia is disabling. Lucilia is volcanic. Andrus is loveless. Andrus is foamy. Andrus is hypodermic. Andrus is unseeable. Estella is loveless. Estella is foamy. Estella is disabling. Estella is hypodermic. Estella is volcanic. Estella is unseeable. Estella is whatsoever. If Estella is loveless and Estella is foamy then Estella is hypodermic. Cold, hypodermic things are whatsoever. If something is disabling then it is hypodermic. Lucilia is not whatsoever.", "logic": "\nLoveless(lucilia)\nFoamy(lucilia)\nDisabling(lucilia)\nVolcanic(lucilia)\nLoveless(andrus)\nFoamy(andrus)\nHypodermic(andrus)\nUnseeable(andrus)\nLoveless(estella)\nFoamy(estella)\nDisabling(estella)\nHypodermic(estella)\nVolcanic(estella)\nUnseeable(estella)\nWhatsoever(estella)\nLoveless(estella) and Foamy(estella) -> Hypodermic(estella)\nforall x (Disabling(x) and Hypodermic(x) -> Whatsoever(x))\nforall x (Disabling(x) -> Hypodermic(x))\n\nnot Whatsoever(lucilia)\n\nDisabling(lucilia) and forall x (Disabling(x) -> Hypodermic(x)) -> therefore Hypodermic(lucilia) Disabling(lucilia) and Hypodermic(lucilia) and forall x (Disabling(x) and Hypodermic(x) -> Whatsoever(x)) -> therefore Whatsoever(lucilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Tybie is bathyal. Tybie is untactful. Tybie is wesleyan. Tybie is impious. Jammie is bathyal. Jammie is untactful. Jammie is downwind. Jammie is docile. Elana is bathyal. Elana is untactful. Elana is wesleyan. Elana is downwind. Elana is impious. Elana is docile. Elana is poltroon. If Elana is bathyal and Elana is untactful then Elana is downwind. Cold, downwind things are poltroon. If something is wesleyan then it is downwind. Jammie is not poltroon.", "logic": "\nBathyal(tybie)\nUntactful(tybie)\nWesleyan(tybie)\nImpious(tybie)\nBathyal(jammie)\nUntactful(jammie)\nDownwind(jammie)\nDocile(jammie)\nBathyal(elana)\nUntactful(elana)\nWesleyan(elana)\nDownwind(elana)\nImpious(elana)\nDocile(elana)\nPoltroon(elana)\nBathyal(elana) and Untactful(elana) -> Downwind(elana)\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) and Downwind(x) -> Poltroon(x))\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) -> Downwind(x))\n\nnot Poltroon(jammie)\n\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) and Downwind(x) -> Poltroon(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Dyanne is lone. Dyanne is registered. Dyanne is goofy. Dyanne is bespoken. Seamus is lone. Seamus is registered. Seamus is composed. Seamus is gauzy. Remus is lone. Remus is registered. Remus is goofy. Remus is composed. Remus is bespoken. Remus is gauzy. Remus is upstream. If Remus is lone and Remus is registered then Remus is composed. Cold, composed things are upstream. If something is goofy then it is composed. Dyanne is gauzy.", "logic": "\nLone(dyanne)\nRegistered(dyanne)\nGoofy(dyanne)\nBespoken(dyanne)\nLone(seamus)\nRegistered(seamus)\nComposed(seamus)\nGauzy(seamus)\nLone(remus)\nRegistered(remus)\nGoofy(remus)\nComposed(remus)\nBespoken(remus)\nGauzy(remus)\nUpstream(remus)\nLone(remus) and Registered(remus) -> Composed(remus)\nforall x (Goofy(x) and Composed(x) -> Upstream(x))\nforall x (Goofy(x) -> Composed(x))\n\nGauzy(dyanne)\n\nGauzy(dyanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Hermione is rwandan. Hermione is covered. Hermione is riblike. Hermione is unshapen. Nertie is rwandan. Nertie is covered. Nertie is scaley. Nertie is winged. Riva is rwandan. Riva is covered. Riva is riblike. Riva is scaley. Riva is unshapen. Riva is winged. Riva is silty. If Riva is rwandan and Riva is covered then Riva is scaley. Cold, scaley things are silty. If something is riblike then it is scaley. Nertie is not unshapen.", "logic": "\nRwandan(hermione)\nCovered(hermione)\nRiblike(hermione)\nUnshapen(hermione)\nRwandan(nertie)\nCovered(nertie)\nScaley(nertie)\nWinged(nertie)\nRwandan(riva)\nCovered(riva)\nRiblike(riva)\nScaley(riva)\nUnshapen(riva)\nWinged(riva)\nSilty(riva)\nRwandan(riva) and Covered(riva) -> Scaley(riva)\nforall x (Riblike(x) and Scaley(x) -> Silty(x))\nforall x (Riblike(x) -> Scaley(x))\n\nnot Unshapen(nertie)\n\nnot Unshapen(nertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Debbra is upmarket. Debbra is harmonic. Debbra is indexical. Debbra is terrible. Emmeline is upmarket. Emmeline is harmonic. Emmeline is dauntless. Emmeline is repentant. Cordie is upmarket. Cordie is harmonic. Cordie is indexical. Cordie is dauntless. Cordie is terrible. Cordie is repentant. Cordie is lazy. If Cordie is upmarket and Cordie is harmonic then Cordie is dauntless. Cold, dauntless things are lazy. If something is indexical then it is dauntless. Emmeline is indexical.", "logic": "\nUpmarket(debbra)\nHarmonic(debbra)\nIndexical(debbra)\nTerrible(debbra)\nUpmarket(emmeline)\nHarmonic(emmeline)\nDauntless(emmeline)\nRepentant(emmeline)\nUpmarket(cordie)\nHarmonic(cordie)\nIndexical(cordie)\nDauntless(cordie)\nTerrible(cordie)\nRepentant(cordie)\nLazy(cordie)\nUpmarket(cordie) and Harmonic(cordie) -> Dauntless(cordie)\nforall x (Indexical(x) and Dauntless(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Indexical(x) -> Dauntless(x))\n\nIndexical(emmeline)\n\nIndexical(emmeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1841"} {"premises": "Hilary is togolese. Hilary is gloveless. Orsa is not togolese. All spiritual things are waterworn. Quiet things are admired. All togolese things are not grassy. If something is waterworn and not acherontic then it is not grassy. If something is gloveless then it is spiritual. If Hilary is grassy then Hilary is not waterworn. Hilary is gloveless.", "logic": "\nTogolese(hilary)\nGloveless(hilary)\nnot Togolese(orsa)\nforall x (Spiritual(x) -> Waterworn(x))\nforall x (Waterworn(x) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> not Grassy(x))\nforall x (Waterworn(x) and not Acherontic(x) -> not Grassy(x))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> Spiritual(x))\nGrassy(hilary) -> not Waterworn(hilary)\n\nGloveless(hilary)\n\ntherefore Gloveless(hilary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Annalisa is ephesian. Annalisa is crimson. Ulric is not ephesian. All softening things are throwaway. Quiet things are simple. All ephesian things are not manageable. If something is throwaway and not farfetched then it is not manageable. If something is crimson then it is softening. If Annalisa is manageable then Annalisa is not throwaway. Ulric is ephesian.", "logic": "\nEphesian(annalisa)\nCrimson(annalisa)\nnot Ephesian(ulric)\nforall x (Softening(x) -> Throwaway(x))\nforall x (Throwaway(x) -> Simple(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) -> not Manageable(x))\nforall x (Throwaway(x) and not Farfetched(x) -> not Manageable(x))\nforall x (Crimson(x) -> Softening(x))\nManageable(annalisa) -> not Throwaway(annalisa)\n\nEphesian(ulric)\n\ntherefore not Ephesian(ulric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Brenna is mitral. Brenna is whispered. Steffen is not mitral. All slatey things are consuming. Quiet things are amharic. All mitral things are not prismatic. If something is consuming and not oversewn then it is not prismatic. If something is whispered then it is slatey. If Brenna is prismatic then Brenna is not consuming. Brenna is not prismatic.", "logic": "\nMitral(brenna)\nWhispered(brenna)\nnot Mitral(steffen)\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Consuming(x) -> Amharic(x))\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> not Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Consuming(x) and not Oversewn(x) -> not Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) -> Slatey(x))\nPrismatic(brenna) -> not Consuming(brenna)\n\nnot Prismatic(brenna)\n\nMitral(brenna) and forall x (Mitral(x) -> not Prismatic(x)) -> therefore not Prismatic(brenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Fanya is trivial. Fanya is dashed. Udell is not trivial. All synoptic things are petaled. Quiet things are meritless. All trivial things are not cataleptic. If something is petaled and not prostyle then it is not cataleptic. If something is dashed then it is synoptic. If Fanya is cataleptic then Fanya is not petaled. Fanya is cataleptic.", "logic": "\nTrivial(fanya)\nDashed(fanya)\nnot Trivial(udell)\nforall x (Synoptic(x) -> Petaled(x))\nforall x (Petaled(x) -> Meritless(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) -> not Cataleptic(x))\nforall x (Petaled(x) and not Prostyle(x) -> not Cataleptic(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) -> Synoptic(x))\nCataleptic(fanya) -> not Petaled(fanya)\n\nCataleptic(fanya)\n\nTrivial(fanya) and forall x (Trivial(x) -> not Cataleptic(x)) -> therefore not Cataleptic(fanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Idelle is cochlear. Idelle is synaptic. Danette is not cochlear. All khaki things are azimuthal. Quiet things are unveiled. All cochlear things are not notorious. If something is azimuthal and not bifilar then it is not notorious. If something is synaptic then it is khaki. If Idelle is notorious then Idelle is not azimuthal. Idelle is azimuthal.", "logic": "\nCochlear(idelle)\nSynaptic(idelle)\nnot Cochlear(danette)\nforall x (Khaki(x) -> Azimuthal(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) -> Unveiled(x))\nforall x (Cochlear(x) -> not Notorious(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and not Bifilar(x) -> not Notorious(x))\nforall x (Synaptic(x) -> Khaki(x))\nNotorious(idelle) -> not Azimuthal(idelle)\n\nAzimuthal(idelle)\n\nSynaptic(idelle) and forall x (Synaptic(x) -> Khaki(x)) -> therefore Khaki(idelle) Khaki(idelle) and forall x (Khaki(x) -> Azimuthal(x)) -> therefore Azimuthal(idelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Theresa is ruminative. Theresa is tallish. Delly is not ruminative. All darling things are marmoreal. Quiet things are bigmouthed. All ruminative things are not curled. If something is marmoreal and not autacoidal then it is not curled. If something is tallish then it is darling. If Theresa is curled then Theresa is not marmoreal. Theresa is not marmoreal.", "logic": "\nRuminative(theresa)\nTallish(theresa)\nnot Ruminative(delly)\nforall x (Darling(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nforall x (Ruminative(x) -> not Curled(x))\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) and not Autacoidal(x) -> not Curled(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Darling(x))\nCurled(theresa) -> not Marmoreal(theresa)\n\nnot Marmoreal(theresa)\n\nTallish(theresa) and forall x (Tallish(x) -> Darling(x)) -> therefore Darling(theresa) Darling(theresa) and forall x (Darling(x) -> Marmoreal(x)) -> therefore Marmoreal(theresa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Roana is unseeded. Roana is thready. Brynn is not unseeded. All acephalous things are unreactive. Quiet things are aneroid. All unseeded things are not arboreal. If something is unreactive and not cherry then it is not arboreal. If something is thready then it is acephalous. If Roana is arboreal then Roana is not unreactive. Brynn is not aneroid.", "logic": "\nUnseeded(roana)\nThready(roana)\nnot Unseeded(brynn)\nforall x (Acephalous(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Unreactive(x) -> Aneroid(x))\nforall x (Unseeded(x) -> not Arboreal(x))\nforall x (Unreactive(x) and not Cherry(x) -> not Arboreal(x))\nforall x (Thready(x) -> Acephalous(x))\nArboreal(roana) -> not Unreactive(roana)\n\nnot Aneroid(brynn)\n\nforall x (Unreactive(x) -> Aneroid(x)) <- forall x (Acephalous(x) -> Unreactive(x)) <- forall x (Thready(x) -> Acephalous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Anetta is candied. Anetta is bumbling. Francesca is not candied. All integral things are addled. Quiet things are unread. All candied things are not coated. If something is addled and not divinatory then it is not coated. If something is bumbling then it is integral. If Anetta is coated then Anetta is not addled. Francesca is integral.", "logic": "\nCandied(anetta)\nBumbling(anetta)\nnot Candied(francesca)\nforall x (Integral(x) -> Addled(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) -> Unread(x))\nforall x (Candied(x) -> not Coated(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) and not Divinatory(x) -> not Coated(x))\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Integral(x))\nCoated(anetta) -> not Addled(anetta)\n\nIntegral(francesca)\n\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Integral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Arvind is antemortem. Arvind is meshugga. Beverie is not antemortem. All unlikable things are slanting. Quiet things are textual. All antemortem things are not athirst. If something is slanting and not prudent then it is not athirst. If something is meshugga then it is unlikable. If Arvind is athirst then Arvind is not slanting. Beverie is not slanting.", "logic": "\nAntemortem(arvind)\nMeshugga(arvind)\nnot Antemortem(beverie)\nforall x (Unlikable(x) -> Slanting(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> not Athirst(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) and not Prudent(x) -> not Athirst(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nAthirst(arvind) -> not Slanting(arvind)\n\nnot Slanting(beverie)\n\nforall x (Unlikable(x) -> Slanting(x)) <- forall x (Meshugga(x) -> Unlikable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Michelina is quenchless. Michelina is allargando. Daryl is not quenchless. All scrub things are grudging. Quiet things are autologous. All quenchless things are not bolshevik. If something is grudging and not ribbonlike then it is not bolshevik. If something is allargando then it is scrub. If Michelina is bolshevik then Michelina is not grudging. Daryl is ribbonlike.", "logic": "\nQuenchless(michelina)\nAllargando(michelina)\nnot Quenchless(daryl)\nforall x (Scrub(x) -> Grudging(x))\nforall x (Grudging(x) -> Autologous(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> not Bolshevik(x))\nforall x (Grudging(x) and not Ribbonlike(x) -> not Bolshevik(x))\nforall x (Allargando(x) -> Scrub(x))\nBolshevik(michelina) -> not Grudging(michelina)\n\nRibbonlike(daryl)\n\nRibbonlike(daryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Harman is distorted. Harman is acapnial. Michaella is not distorted. All kenyan things are graded. Quiet things are uncoerced. All distorted things are not bromidic. If something is graded and not favorable then it is not bromidic. If something is acapnial then it is kenyan. If Harman is bromidic then Harman is not graded. Michaella is not acapnial.", "logic": "\nDistorted(harman)\nAcapnial(harman)\nnot Distorted(michaella)\nforall x (Kenyan(x) -> Graded(x))\nforall x (Graded(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Distorted(x) -> not Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Graded(x) and not Favorable(x) -> not Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Acapnial(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nBromidic(harman) -> not Graded(harman)\n\nnot Acapnial(michaella)\n\nnot Acapnial(michaella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Mirabel is synoptical. Mirabel is filar. Letitia is not synoptical. All pyaemic things are cancelled. Quiet things are exulting. All synoptical things are not acrobatic. If something is cancelled and not epizoic then it is not acrobatic. If something is filar then it is pyaemic. If Mirabel is acrobatic then Mirabel is not cancelled. Mirabel is epizoic.", "logic": "\nSynoptical(mirabel)\nFilar(mirabel)\nnot Synoptical(letitia)\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Cancelled(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> not Acrobatic(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) and not Epizoic(x) -> not Acrobatic(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nAcrobatic(mirabel) -> not Cancelled(mirabel)\n\nEpizoic(mirabel)\n\nEpizoic(mirabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1043"} {"premises": "Minnie is endovenous. Minnie is emboldened. Minnie is prescient. If something is endovenous and wakeless then it is diploid. Kind, prescient things are wakeless. If something is wakeless then it is candent. If something is endovenous then it is emboldened. All tremendous things are emboldened. If Minnie is emboldened then Minnie is tremendous. Minnie is prescient.", "logic": "\nEndovenous(minnie)\nEmboldened(minnie)\nPrescient(minnie)\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Wakeless(x) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Prescient(x) -> Wakeless(x))\nforall x (Wakeless(x) -> Candent(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Tremendous(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nEmboldened(minnie) -> Tremendous(minnie)\n\nPrescient(minnie)\n\ntherefore Prescient(minnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-452"} {"premises": "Kaleb is ulcerated. Kaleb is uncheerful. Kaleb is misbegot. If something is ulcerated and subacute then it is confiscate. Kind, misbegot things are subacute. If something is subacute then it is indie. If something is ulcerated then it is uncheerful. All mesozoic things are uncheerful. If Kaleb is uncheerful then Kaleb is mesozoic. Kaleb is not misbegot.", "logic": "\nUlcerated(kaleb)\nUncheerful(kaleb)\nMisbegot(kaleb)\nforall x (Ulcerated(x) and Subacute(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nforall x (Ulcerated(x) and Misbegot(x) -> Subacute(x))\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Indie(x))\nforall x (Ulcerated(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\nUncheerful(kaleb) -> Mesozoic(kaleb)\n\nnot Misbegot(kaleb)\n\ntherefore Misbegot(kaleb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-452"} {"premises": "Ervin is cute. Ervin is miscible. Ervin is plantal. If something is cute and accursed then it is formulated. Kind, plantal things are accursed. If something is accursed then it is unlipped. If something is cute then it is miscible. All observable things are miscible. If Ervin is miscible then Ervin is observable. Ervin is accursed.", "logic": "\nCute(ervin)\nMiscible(ervin)\nPlantal(ervin)\nforall x (Cute(x) and Accursed(x) -> Formulated(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) and Plantal(x) -> Accursed(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Observable(x) -> Miscible(x))\nMiscible(ervin) -> Observable(ervin)\n\nAccursed(ervin)\n\nCute(ervin) and Plantal(ervin) and forall x (Cute(x) and Plantal(x) -> Accursed(x)) -> therefore Accursed(ervin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-452"} {"premises": "Mayda is uptown. Mayda is muzzy. Mayda is located. If something is uptown and univocal then it is rampageous. Kind, located things are univocal. If something is univocal then it is smaller. If something is uptown then it is muzzy. All coeliac things are muzzy. If Mayda is muzzy then Mayda is coeliac. Mayda is not coeliac.", "logic": "\nUptown(mayda)\nMuzzy(mayda)\nLocated(mayda)\nforall x (Uptown(x) and Univocal(x) -> Rampageous(x))\nforall x (Uptown(x) and Located(x) -> Univocal(x))\nforall x (Univocal(x) -> Smaller(x))\nforall x (Uptown(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nMuzzy(mayda) -> Coeliac(mayda)\n\nnot Coeliac(mayda)\n\nMuzzy(mayda) and Muzzy(mayda) -> Coeliac(mayda) -> therefore Coeliac(mayda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-452"} {"premises": "Zarla is synergetic. Zarla is puffed. Zarla is bulging. If something is synergetic and cruciform then it is toothlike. Kind, bulging things are cruciform. If something is cruciform then it is lamblike. If something is synergetic then it is puffed. All projected things are puffed. If Zarla is puffed then Zarla is projected. Zarla is toothlike.", "logic": "\nSynergetic(zarla)\nPuffed(zarla)\nBulging(zarla)\nforall x (Synergetic(x) and Cruciform(x) -> Toothlike(x))\nforall x (Synergetic(x) and Bulging(x) -> Cruciform(x))\nforall x (Cruciform(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nforall x (Synergetic(x) -> Puffed(x))\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Puffed(x))\nPuffed(zarla) -> Projected(zarla)\n\nToothlike(zarla)\n\nSynergetic(zarla) and Bulging(zarla) and forall x (Synergetic(x) and Bulging(x) -> Cruciform(x)) -> therefore Cruciform(zarla) Synergetic(zarla) and Cruciform(zarla) and forall x (Synergetic(x) and Cruciform(x) -> Toothlike(x)) -> therefore Toothlike(zarla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-452"} {"premises": "Nikoletta is saturnine. Nikoletta is illusional. Nikoletta is segmental. If something is saturnine and away then it is unrenewed. Kind, segmental things are away. If something is away then it is blowzy. If something is saturnine then it is illusional. All punctual things are illusional. If Nikoletta is illusional then Nikoletta is punctual. Nikoletta is not unrenewed.", "logic": "\nSaturnine(nikoletta)\nIllusional(nikoletta)\nSegmental(nikoletta)\nforall x (Saturnine(x) and Away(x) -> Unrenewed(x))\nforall x (Saturnine(x) and Segmental(x) -> Away(x))\nforall x (Away(x) -> Blowzy(x))\nforall x (Saturnine(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Punctual(x) -> Illusional(x))\nIllusional(nikoletta) -> Punctual(nikoletta)\n\nnot Unrenewed(nikoletta)\n\nSaturnine(nikoletta) and Segmental(nikoletta) and forall x (Saturnine(x) and Segmental(x) -> Away(x)) -> therefore Away(nikoletta) Saturnine(nikoletta) and Away(nikoletta) and forall x (Saturnine(x) and Away(x) -> Unrenewed(x)) -> therefore Unrenewed(nikoletta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-452"} {"premises": "Tadd is frothy. If someone is donnish and not raspy then they are not frothy. All raspy, donnish people are geodesical. If someone is frothy then they are not nonunion. If Tadd is not wired and Tadd is not donnish then Tadd is not frothy. If someone is nonunion and frothy then they are actuarial. If Tadd is not nonunion then Tadd is not geodesical. Tadd is frothy.", "logic": "\nFrothy(tadd)\nforall x (Donnish(x) and not Raspy(x) -> not Frothy(x))\nforall x (Raspy(x) and Donnish(x) -> Geodesical(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) -> not Nonunion(x))\nnot Wired(tadd) and not Donnish(tadd) -> not Frothy(tadd)\nforall x (Nonunion(x) and Frothy(x) -> Actuarial(x))\nnot Nonunion(tadd) -> not Geodesical(tadd)\n\nFrothy(tadd)\n\ntherefore Frothy(tadd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Mick is precast. If someone is genotypic and not aliphatic then they are not precast. All aliphatic, genotypic people are valued. If someone is precast then they are not residual. If Mick is not talismanic and Mick is not genotypic then Mick is not precast. If someone is residual and precast then they are humid. If Mick is not residual then Mick is not valued. Mick is not precast.", "logic": "\nPrecast(mick)\nforall x (Genotypic(x) and not Aliphatic(x) -> not Precast(x))\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) and Genotypic(x) -> Valued(x))\nforall x (Precast(x) -> not Residual(x))\nnot Talismanic(mick) and not Genotypic(mick) -> not Precast(mick)\nforall x (Residual(x) and Precast(x) -> Humid(x))\nnot Residual(mick) -> not Valued(mick)\n\nnot Precast(mick)\n\ntherefore Precast(mick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Ilse is freeborn. If someone is altered and not genital then they are not freeborn. All genital, altered people are deducible. If someone is freeborn then they are not confiscate. If Ilse is not basilican and Ilse is not altered then Ilse is not freeborn. If someone is confiscate and freeborn then they are humorless. If Ilse is not confiscate then Ilse is not deducible. Ilse is not confiscate.", "logic": "\nFreeborn(ilse)\nforall x (Altered(x) and not Genital(x) -> not Freeborn(x))\nforall x (Genital(x) and Altered(x) -> Deducible(x))\nforall x (Freeborn(x) -> not Confiscate(x))\nnot Basilican(ilse) and not Altered(ilse) -> not Freeborn(ilse)\nforall x (Confiscate(x) and Freeborn(x) -> Humorless(x))\nnot Confiscate(ilse) -> not Deducible(ilse)\n\nnot Confiscate(ilse)\n\nFreeborn(ilse) and forall x (Freeborn(x) -> not Confiscate(x)) -> therefore not Confiscate(ilse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Loren is methylated. If someone is lactogenic and not ultimate then they are not methylated. All ultimate, lactogenic people are cypriote. If someone is methylated then they are not motional. If Loren is not buggy and Loren is not lactogenic then Loren is not methylated. If someone is motional and methylated then they are spangled. If Loren is not motional then Loren is not cypriote. Loren is motional.", "logic": "\nMethylated(loren)\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) and not Ultimate(x) -> not Methylated(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Cypriote(x))\nforall x (Methylated(x) -> not Motional(x))\nnot Buggy(loren) and not Lactogenic(loren) -> not Methylated(loren)\nforall x (Motional(x) and Methylated(x) -> Spangled(x))\nnot Motional(loren) -> not Cypriote(loren)\n\nMotional(loren)\n\nMethylated(loren) and forall x (Methylated(x) -> not Motional(x)) -> therefore not Motional(loren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Tabbitha is yearlong. If someone is kosher and not panoplied then they are not yearlong. All panoplied, kosher people are refractive. If someone is yearlong then they are not marvelous. If Tabbitha is not marbleized and Tabbitha is not kosher then Tabbitha is not yearlong. If someone is marvelous and yearlong then they are extreme. If Tabbitha is not marvelous then Tabbitha is not refractive. Tabbitha is not refractive.", "logic": "\nYearlong(tabbitha)\nforall x (Kosher(x) and not Panoplied(x) -> not Yearlong(x))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and Kosher(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Yearlong(x) -> not Marvelous(x))\nnot Marbleized(tabbitha) and not Kosher(tabbitha) -> not Yearlong(tabbitha)\nforall x (Marvelous(x) and Yearlong(x) -> Extreme(x))\nnot Marvelous(tabbitha) -> not Refractive(tabbitha)\n\nnot Refractive(tabbitha)\n\nYearlong(tabbitha) and forall x (Yearlong(x) -> not Marvelous(x)) -> therefore not Marvelous(tabbitha) not Marvelous(tabbitha) and not Marvelous(tabbitha) -> not Refractive(tabbitha) -> therefore not Refractive(tabbitha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Daryn is jainist. If someone is scurfy and not useless then they are not jainist. All useless, scurfy people are stoical. If someone is jainist then they are not bluish. If Daryn is not malformed and Daryn is not scurfy then Daryn is not jainist. If someone is bluish and jainist then they are swordlike. If Daryn is not bluish then Daryn is not stoical. Daryn is stoical.", "logic": "\nJainist(daryn)\nforall x (Scurfy(x) and not Useless(x) -> not Jainist(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) and Scurfy(x) -> Stoical(x))\nforall x (Jainist(x) -> not Bluish(x))\nnot Malformed(daryn) and not Scurfy(daryn) -> not Jainist(daryn)\nforall x (Bluish(x) and Jainist(x) -> Swordlike(x))\nnot Bluish(daryn) -> not Stoical(daryn)\n\nStoical(daryn)\n\nJainist(daryn) and forall x (Jainist(x) -> not Bluish(x)) -> therefore not Bluish(daryn) not Bluish(daryn) and not Bluish(daryn) -> not Stoical(daryn) -> therefore not Stoical(daryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Jervis is syndetic. If someone is polychrome and not goethian then they are not syndetic. All goethian, polychrome people are yogistic. If someone is syndetic then they are not undersized. If Jervis is not bladed and Jervis is not polychrome then Jervis is not syndetic. If someone is undersized and syndetic then they are acting. If Jervis is not undersized then Jervis is not yogistic. Jervis is not acting.", "logic": "\nSyndetic(jervis)\nforall x (Polychrome(x) and not Goethian(x) -> not Syndetic(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) and Polychrome(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Syndetic(x) -> not Undersized(x))\nnot Bladed(jervis) and not Polychrome(jervis) -> not Syndetic(jervis)\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Syndetic(x) -> Acting(x))\nnot Undersized(jervis) -> not Yogistic(jervis)\n\nnot Acting(jervis)\n\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Syndetic(x) -> Acting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Erich is slurred. If someone is astral and not unpierced then they are not slurred. All unpierced, astral people are taboo. If someone is slurred then they are not earless. If Erich is not disheveled and Erich is not astral then Erich is not slurred. If someone is earless and slurred then they are shintoist. If Erich is not earless then Erich is not taboo. Erich is astral.", "logic": "\nSlurred(erich)\nforall x (Astral(x) and not Unpierced(x) -> not Slurred(x))\nforall x (Unpierced(x) and Astral(x) -> Taboo(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> not Earless(x))\nnot Disheveled(erich) and not Astral(erich) -> not Slurred(erich)\nforall x (Earless(x) and Slurred(x) -> Shintoist(x))\nnot Earless(erich) -> not Taboo(erich)\n\nAstral(erich)\n\nAstral(erich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Evaleen is propitious. If someone is optimal and not important then they are not propitious. All important, optimal people are eutherian. If someone is propitious then they are not septate. If Evaleen is not anaclinal and Evaleen is not optimal then Evaleen is not propitious. If someone is septate and propitious then they are hoarse. If Evaleen is not septate then Evaleen is not eutherian. Evaleen is not important.", "logic": "\nPropitious(evaleen)\nforall x (Optimal(x) and not Important(x) -> not Propitious(x))\nforall x (Important(x) and Optimal(x) -> Eutherian(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> not Septate(x))\nnot Anaclinal(evaleen) and not Optimal(evaleen) -> not Propitious(evaleen)\nforall x (Septate(x) and Propitious(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nnot Septate(evaleen) -> not Eutherian(evaleen)\n\nnot Important(evaleen)\n\nnot Important(evaleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Talbert is spindly. If someone is precarious and not pugnacious then they are not spindly. All pugnacious, precarious people are uncurled. If someone is spindly then they are not undersize. If Talbert is not illiberal and Talbert is not precarious then Talbert is not spindly. If someone is undersize and spindly then they are together. If Talbert is not undersize then Talbert is not uncurled. Talbert is illiberal.", "logic": "\nSpindly(talbert)\nforall x (Precarious(x) and not Pugnacious(x) -> not Spindly(x))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) and Precarious(x) -> Uncurled(x))\nforall x (Spindly(x) -> not Undersize(x))\nnot Illiberal(talbert) and not Precarious(talbert) -> not Spindly(talbert)\nforall x (Undersize(x) and Spindly(x) -> Together(x))\nnot Undersize(talbert) -> not Uncurled(talbert)\n\nIlliberal(talbert)\n\nIlliberal(talbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2173"} {"premises": "Jervis is fine. Jervis is saltlike. Jervis is fitter. Jervis is unfearing. Jervis is nonmetal. Catherine is not iranian. Catherine is saltlike. Catherine is unfearing. Jany is iranian. Jany is zygomatic. Jany is fitter. Jany is nonmetal. If Jany is fitter then Jany is not unfearing. If Catherine is nonmetal and Catherine is fine then Catherine is iranian. If Jany is fine then Jany is iranian. If Catherine is iranian then Catherine is not nonmetal. Young people are zygomatic. If someone is saltlike then they are fine. White people are saltlike. If someone is iranian and not unfearing then they are not saltlike. Jany is iranian.", "logic": "\nFine(jervis)\nSaltlike(jervis)\nFitter(jervis)\nUnfearing(jervis)\nNonmetal(jervis)\nnot Iranian(catherine)\nSaltlike(catherine)\nUnfearing(catherine)\nIranian(jany)\nZygomatic(jany)\nFitter(jany)\nNonmetal(jany)\nFitter(jany) -> not Unfearing(jany)\nNonmetal(catherine) and Fine(catherine) -> Iranian(catherine)\nFine(jany) -> Iranian(jany)\nIranian(catherine) -> not Nonmetal(catherine)\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Saltlike(x) -> Fine(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) -> Saltlike(x))\nforall x (Iranian(x) and not Unfearing(x) -> not Saltlike(x))\n\nIranian(jany)\n\ntherefore Iranian(jany)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Rosalynd is commodious. Rosalynd is avestan. Rosalynd is hectic. Rosalynd is striped. Rosalynd is incised. Estelle is not resilient. Estelle is avestan. Estelle is striped. Mendel is resilient. Mendel is drowsing. Mendel is hectic. Mendel is incised. If Mendel is hectic then Mendel is not striped. If Estelle is incised and Estelle is commodious then Estelle is resilient. If Mendel is commodious then Mendel is resilient. If Estelle is resilient then Estelle is not incised. Young people are drowsing. If someone is avestan then they are commodious. White people are avestan. If someone is resilient and not striped then they are not avestan. Mendel is not incised.", "logic": "\nCommodious(rosalynd)\nAvestan(rosalynd)\nHectic(rosalynd)\nStriped(rosalynd)\nIncised(rosalynd)\nnot Resilient(estelle)\nAvestan(estelle)\nStriped(estelle)\nResilient(mendel)\nDrowsing(mendel)\nHectic(mendel)\nIncised(mendel)\nHectic(mendel) -> not Striped(mendel)\nIncised(estelle) and Commodious(estelle) -> Resilient(estelle)\nCommodious(mendel) -> Resilient(mendel)\nResilient(estelle) -> not Incised(estelle)\nforall x (Incised(x) -> Drowsing(x))\nforall x (Avestan(x) -> Commodious(x))\nforall x (Striped(x) -> Avestan(x))\nforall x (Resilient(x) and not Striped(x) -> not Avestan(x))\n\nnot Incised(mendel)\n\ntherefore Incised(mendel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Carlyn is essential. Carlyn is riparian. Carlyn is nuclear. Carlyn is miserly. Carlyn is dumb. Calla is not gladdened. Calla is riparian. Calla is miserly. Nadya is gladdened. Nadya is chatty. Nadya is nuclear. Nadya is dumb. If Nadya is nuclear then Nadya is not miserly. If Calla is dumb and Calla is essential then Calla is gladdened. If Nadya is essential then Nadya is gladdened. If Calla is gladdened then Calla is not dumb. Young people are chatty. If someone is riparian then they are essential. White people are riparian. If someone is gladdened and not miserly then they are not riparian. Calla is essential.", "logic": "\nEssential(carlyn)\nRiparian(carlyn)\nNuclear(carlyn)\nMiserly(carlyn)\nDumb(carlyn)\nnot Gladdened(calla)\nRiparian(calla)\nMiserly(calla)\nGladdened(nadya)\nChatty(nadya)\nNuclear(nadya)\nDumb(nadya)\nNuclear(nadya) -> not Miserly(nadya)\nDumb(calla) and Essential(calla) -> Gladdened(calla)\nEssential(nadya) -> Gladdened(nadya)\nGladdened(calla) -> not Dumb(calla)\nforall x (Dumb(x) -> Chatty(x))\nforall x (Riparian(x) -> Essential(x))\nforall x (Miserly(x) -> Riparian(x))\nforall x (Gladdened(x) and not Miserly(x) -> not Riparian(x))\n\nEssential(calla)\n\nRiparian(calla) and forall x (Riparian(x) -> Essential(x)) -> therefore Essential(calla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Torre is retentive. Torre is minded. Torre is burrlike. Torre is unavenged. Torre is connubial. Stacey is not circinate. Stacey is minded. Stacey is unavenged. Travers is circinate. Travers is exuberant. Travers is burrlike. Travers is connubial. If Travers is burrlike then Travers is not unavenged. If Stacey is connubial and Stacey is retentive then Stacey is circinate. If Travers is retentive then Travers is circinate. If Stacey is circinate then Stacey is not connubial. Young people are exuberant. If someone is minded then they are retentive. White people are minded. If someone is circinate and not unavenged then they are not minded. Travers is unavenged.", "logic": "\nRetentive(torre)\nMinded(torre)\nBurrlike(torre)\nUnavenged(torre)\nConnubial(torre)\nnot Circinate(stacey)\nMinded(stacey)\nUnavenged(stacey)\nCircinate(travers)\nExuberant(travers)\nBurrlike(travers)\nConnubial(travers)\nBurrlike(travers) -> not Unavenged(travers)\nConnubial(stacey) and Retentive(stacey) -> Circinate(stacey)\nRetentive(travers) -> Circinate(travers)\nCircinate(stacey) -> not Connubial(stacey)\nforall x (Connubial(x) -> Exuberant(x))\nforall x (Minded(x) -> Retentive(x))\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> Minded(x))\nforall x (Circinate(x) and not Unavenged(x) -> not Minded(x))\n\nUnavenged(travers)\n\nBurrlike(travers) and Burrlike(travers) -> not Unavenged(travers) -> therefore not Unavenged(travers)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Algernon is esoteric. Algernon is smitten. Algernon is brutal. Algernon is stonelike. Algernon is affable. Renelle is not artful. Renelle is smitten. Renelle is stonelike. Enrica is artful. Enrica is anti. Enrica is brutal. Enrica is affable. If Enrica is brutal then Enrica is not stonelike. If Renelle is affable and Renelle is esoteric then Renelle is artful. If Enrica is esoteric then Enrica is artful. If Renelle is artful then Renelle is not affable. Young people are anti. If someone is smitten then they are esoteric. White people are smitten. If someone is artful and not stonelike then they are not smitten. Enrica is not smitten.", "logic": "\nEsoteric(algernon)\nSmitten(algernon)\nBrutal(algernon)\nStonelike(algernon)\nAffable(algernon)\nnot Artful(renelle)\nSmitten(renelle)\nStonelike(renelle)\nArtful(enrica)\nAnti(enrica)\nBrutal(enrica)\nAffable(enrica)\nBrutal(enrica) -> not Stonelike(enrica)\nAffable(renelle) and Esoteric(renelle) -> Artful(renelle)\nEsoteric(enrica) -> Artful(enrica)\nArtful(renelle) -> not Affable(renelle)\nforall x (Affable(x) -> Anti(x))\nforall x (Smitten(x) -> Esoteric(x))\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> Smitten(x))\nforall x (Artful(x) and not Stonelike(x) -> not Smitten(x))\n\nnot Smitten(enrica)\n\nBrutal(enrica) and Brutal(enrica) -> not Stonelike(enrica) -> therefore not Stonelike(enrica) Artful(enrica) and not Stonelike(enrica) and forall x (Artful(x) and not Stonelike(x) -> not Smitten(x)) -> therefore not Smitten(enrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Chaddy is accusive. Chaddy is germfree. Chaddy is lukewarm. Chaddy is alleviated. Chaddy is pleading. Harlin is not primo. Harlin is germfree. Harlin is alleviated. Elysia is primo. Elysia is truncated. Elysia is lukewarm. Elysia is pleading. If Elysia is lukewarm then Elysia is not alleviated. If Harlin is pleading and Harlin is accusive then Harlin is primo. If Elysia is accusive then Elysia is primo. If Harlin is primo then Harlin is not pleading. Young people are truncated. If someone is germfree then they are accusive. White people are germfree. If someone is primo and not alleviated then they are not germfree. Elysia is germfree.", "logic": "\nAccusive(chaddy)\nGermfree(chaddy)\nLukewarm(chaddy)\nAlleviated(chaddy)\nPleading(chaddy)\nnot Primo(harlin)\nGermfree(harlin)\nAlleviated(harlin)\nPrimo(elysia)\nTruncated(elysia)\nLukewarm(elysia)\nPleading(elysia)\nLukewarm(elysia) -> not Alleviated(elysia)\nPleading(harlin) and Accusive(harlin) -> Primo(harlin)\nAccusive(elysia) -> Primo(elysia)\nPrimo(harlin) -> not Pleading(harlin)\nforall x (Pleading(x) -> Truncated(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Alleviated(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Primo(x) and not Alleviated(x) -> not Germfree(x))\n\nGermfree(elysia)\n\nLukewarm(elysia) and Lukewarm(elysia) -> not Alleviated(elysia) -> therefore not Alleviated(elysia) Primo(elysia) and not Alleviated(elysia) and forall x (Primo(x) and not Alleviated(x) -> not Germfree(x)) -> therefore not Germfree(elysia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Marita is colloidal. Marita is manifest. Marita is unbalanced. Marita is effete. Marita is heatless. Marylee is not frenetic. Marylee is manifest. Marylee is effete. Tabina is frenetic. Tabina is junior. Tabina is unbalanced. Tabina is heatless. If Tabina is unbalanced then Tabina is not effete. If Marylee is heatless and Marylee is colloidal then Marylee is frenetic. If Tabina is colloidal then Tabina is frenetic. If Marylee is frenetic then Marylee is not heatless. Young people are junior. If someone is manifest then they are colloidal. White people are manifest. If someone is frenetic and not effete then they are not manifest. Tabina is not colloidal.", "logic": "\nColloidal(marita)\nManifest(marita)\nUnbalanced(marita)\nEffete(marita)\nHeatless(marita)\nnot Frenetic(marylee)\nManifest(marylee)\nEffete(marylee)\nFrenetic(tabina)\nJunior(tabina)\nUnbalanced(tabina)\nHeatless(tabina)\nUnbalanced(tabina) -> not Effete(tabina)\nHeatless(marylee) and Colloidal(marylee) -> Frenetic(marylee)\nColloidal(tabina) -> Frenetic(tabina)\nFrenetic(marylee) -> not Heatless(marylee)\nforall x (Heatless(x) -> Junior(x))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Effete(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Frenetic(x) and not Effete(x) -> not Manifest(x))\n\nnot Colloidal(tabina)\n\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Colloidal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Dove is ignoble. Dove is aeolian. Dove is sellable. Dove is isolable. Dove is acanthoid. Marianne is not unwearying. Marianne is aeolian. Marianne is isolable. Rajeev is unwearying. Rajeev is prepaid. Rajeev is sellable. Rajeev is acanthoid. If Rajeev is sellable then Rajeev is not isolable. If Marianne is acanthoid and Marianne is ignoble then Marianne is unwearying. If Rajeev is ignoble then Rajeev is unwearying. If Marianne is unwearying then Marianne is not acanthoid. Young people are prepaid. If someone is aeolian then they are ignoble. White people are aeolian. If someone is unwearying and not isolable then they are not aeolian. Marianne is prepaid.", "logic": "\nIgnoble(dove)\nAeolian(dove)\nSellable(dove)\nIsolable(dove)\nAcanthoid(dove)\nnot Unwearying(marianne)\nAeolian(marianne)\nIsolable(marianne)\nUnwearying(rajeev)\nPrepaid(rajeev)\nSellable(rajeev)\nAcanthoid(rajeev)\nSellable(rajeev) -> not Isolable(rajeev)\nAcanthoid(marianne) and Ignoble(marianne) -> Unwearying(marianne)\nIgnoble(rajeev) -> Unwearying(rajeev)\nUnwearying(marianne) -> not Acanthoid(marianne)\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Isolable(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) and not Isolable(x) -> not Aeolian(x))\n\nPrepaid(marianne)\n\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) -> Prepaid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Wendi is sovereign. Wendi is sloshed. Wendi is chelated. Wendi is spectral. Wendi is detractive. Jed is not highflying. Jed is sloshed. Jed is spectral. Noel is highflying. Noel is hatted. Noel is chelated. Noel is detractive. If Noel is chelated then Noel is not spectral. If Jed is detractive and Jed is sovereign then Jed is highflying. If Noel is sovereign then Noel is highflying. If Jed is highflying then Jed is not detractive. Young people are hatted. If someone is sloshed then they are sovereign. White people are sloshed. If someone is highflying and not spectral then they are not sloshed. Wendi is not highflying.", "logic": "\nSovereign(wendi)\nSloshed(wendi)\nChelated(wendi)\nSpectral(wendi)\nDetractive(wendi)\nnot Highflying(jed)\nSloshed(jed)\nSpectral(jed)\nHighflying(noel)\nHatted(noel)\nChelated(noel)\nDetractive(noel)\nChelated(noel) -> not Spectral(noel)\nDetractive(jed) and Sovereign(jed) -> Highflying(jed)\nSovereign(noel) -> Highflying(noel)\nHighflying(jed) -> not Detractive(jed)\nforall x (Detractive(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Spectral(x) -> Sloshed(x))\nforall x (Highflying(x) and not Spectral(x) -> not Sloshed(x))\n\nnot Highflying(wendi)\n\nnot Highflying(wendi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "Kelcey is jeweled. Kelcey is scrimy. Kelcey is tenanted. Kelcey is laboring. Kelcey is reprobate. Teodorico is not vicenary. Teodorico is scrimy. Teodorico is laboring. Remington is vicenary. Remington is secret. Remington is tenanted. Remington is reprobate. If Remington is tenanted then Remington is not laboring. If Teodorico is reprobate and Teodorico is jeweled then Teodorico is vicenary. If Remington is jeweled then Remington is vicenary. If Teodorico is vicenary then Teodorico is not reprobate. Young people are secret. If someone is scrimy then they are jeweled. White people are scrimy. If someone is vicenary and not laboring then they are not scrimy. Teodorico is reprobate.", "logic": "\nJeweled(kelcey)\nScrimy(kelcey)\nTenanted(kelcey)\nLaboring(kelcey)\nReprobate(kelcey)\nnot Vicenary(teodorico)\nScrimy(teodorico)\nLaboring(teodorico)\nVicenary(remington)\nSecret(remington)\nTenanted(remington)\nReprobate(remington)\nTenanted(remington) -> not Laboring(remington)\nReprobate(teodorico) and Jeweled(teodorico) -> Vicenary(teodorico)\nJeweled(remington) -> Vicenary(remington)\nVicenary(teodorico) -> not Reprobate(teodorico)\nforall x (Reprobate(x) -> Secret(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Vicenary(x) and not Laboring(x) -> not Scrimy(x))\n\nReprobate(teodorico)\n\nReprobate(teodorico) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1882"} {"premises": "The jermaine dawn the brandais. The jermaine is trillion. The jermaine is total. The jermaine is surviving. The jermaine is obtuse. The jermaine string the brandais. The jermaine coeducate the brandais. The brandais dawn the jermaine. The brandais is trillion. The brandais is gutless. The brandais is total. The brandais is surviving. The brandais is obtuse. The brandais string the jermaine. The brandais coeducate the jermaine. If something dawn the jermaine then it string the jermaine. If something coeducate the jermaine and the jermaine dawn the brandais then it string the jermaine. If something is surviving and it dawn the jermaine then the jermaine is surviving. If something is surviving and it dawn the brandais then it coeducate the brandais. If the jermaine is obtuse and the jermaine dawn the brandais then the jermaine coeducate the brandais. If something is total and it dawn the brandais then the brandais is total. If something is total and obtuse then it dawn the brandais. If something is gutless then it coeducate the jermaine. The brandais is trillion.", "logic": "\nDawn(jermaine, brandais)\nTrillion(jermaine)\nTotal(jermaine)\nSurviving(jermaine)\nObtuse(jermaine)\nString(jermaine, brandais)\nCoeducate(jermaine, brandais)\nDawn(brandais, jermaine)\nTrillion(brandais)\nGutless(brandais)\nTotal(brandais)\nSurviving(brandais)\nObtuse(brandais)\nString(brandais, jermaine)\nCoeducate(brandais, jermaine)\nforall x (Dawn(x, jermaine) -> String(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Coeducate(x, jermaine) and Dawn(jermaine, brandais) -> String(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Surviving(x) and Dawn(x, jermaine) -> Surviving(jermaine))\nforall x (Surviving(x) and Dawn(x, brandais) -> Coeducate(x, brandais))\nObtuse(jermaine) and Dawn(jermaine, brandais) -> Coeducate(jermaine, brandais)\nforall x (Total(x) and Dawn(x, brandais) -> Total(brandais))\nforall x (Total(x) and Obtuse(x) -> Dawn(x, brandais))\nforall x (Gutless(x) -> Coeducate(x, jermaine))\n\nTrillion(brandais)\n\ntherefore Trillion(brandais)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The scotty amputate the dylan. The scotty is respectful. The scotty is minimum. The scotty is unthinking. The scotty is moire. The scotty veneer the dylan. The scotty field the dylan. The dylan amputate the scotty. The dylan is respectful. The dylan is analgetic. The dylan is minimum. The dylan is unthinking. The dylan is moire. The dylan veneer the scotty. The dylan field the scotty. If something amputate the scotty then it veneer the scotty. If something field the scotty and the scotty amputate the dylan then it veneer the scotty. If something is unthinking and it amputate the scotty then the scotty is unthinking. If something is unthinking and it amputate the dylan then it field the dylan. If the scotty is moire and the scotty amputate the dylan then the scotty field the dylan. If something is minimum and it amputate the dylan then the dylan is minimum. If something is minimum and moire then it amputate the dylan. If something is analgetic then it field the scotty. The scotty does not visit the dylan.", "logic": "\nAmputate(scotty, dylan)\nRespectful(scotty)\nMinimum(scotty)\nUnthinking(scotty)\nMoire(scotty)\nVeneer(scotty, dylan)\nField(scotty, dylan)\nAmputate(dylan, scotty)\nRespectful(dylan)\nAnalgetic(dylan)\nMinimum(dylan)\nUnthinking(dylan)\nMoire(dylan)\nVeneer(dylan, scotty)\nField(dylan, scotty)\nforall x (Amputate(x, scotty) -> Veneer(x, scotty))\nforall x (Field(x, scotty) and Amputate(scotty, dylan) -> Veneer(x, scotty))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) and Amputate(x, scotty) -> Unthinking(scotty))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) and Amputate(x, dylan) -> Field(x, dylan))\nMoire(scotty) and Amputate(scotty, dylan) -> Field(scotty, dylan)\nforall x (Minimum(x) and Amputate(x, dylan) -> Minimum(dylan))\nforall x (Minimum(x) and Moire(x) -> Amputate(x, dylan))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Field(x, scotty))\n\nnot Field(scotty, dylan)\n\ntherefore Field(scotty, dylan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The pepe senesce the sharie. The pepe is unfirm. The pepe is restful. The pepe is lactogenic. The pepe is played. The pepe treadle the sharie. The pepe club the sharie. The sharie senesce the pepe. The sharie is unfirm. The sharie is pally. The sharie is restful. The sharie is lactogenic. The sharie is played. The sharie treadle the pepe. The sharie club the pepe. If something senesce the pepe then it treadle the pepe. If something club the pepe and the pepe senesce the sharie then it treadle the pepe. If something is lactogenic and it senesce the pepe then the pepe is lactogenic. If something is lactogenic and it senesce the sharie then it club the sharie. If the pepe is played and the pepe senesce the sharie then the pepe club the sharie. If something is restful and it senesce the sharie then the sharie is restful. If something is restful and played then it senesce the sharie. If something is pally then it club the pepe. The sharie senesce the sharie.", "logic": "\nSenesce(pepe, sharie)\nUnfirm(pepe)\nRestful(pepe)\nLactogenic(pepe)\nPlayed(pepe)\nTreadle(pepe, sharie)\nClub(pepe, sharie)\nSenesce(sharie, pepe)\nUnfirm(sharie)\nPally(sharie)\nRestful(sharie)\nLactogenic(sharie)\nPlayed(sharie)\nTreadle(sharie, pepe)\nClub(sharie, pepe)\nforall x (Senesce(x, pepe) -> Treadle(x, pepe))\nforall x (Club(x, pepe) and Senesce(pepe, sharie) -> Treadle(x, pepe))\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) and Senesce(x, pepe) -> Lactogenic(pepe))\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) and Senesce(x, sharie) -> Club(x, sharie))\nPlayed(pepe) and Senesce(pepe, sharie) -> Club(pepe, sharie)\nforall x (Restful(x) and Senesce(x, sharie) -> Restful(sharie))\nforall x (Restful(x) and Played(x) -> Senesce(x, sharie))\nforall x (Pally(x) -> Club(x, pepe))\n\nSenesce(sharie, sharie)\n\nRestful(sharie) and Played(sharie) and forall x (Restful(x) and Played(x) -> Senesce(x, sharie)) -> therefore Senesce(sharie, sharie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The zorina interleave the meredithe. The zorina is callow. The zorina is sundried. The zorina is desirous. The zorina is continuant. The zorina emaciate the meredithe. The zorina squint the meredithe. The meredithe interleave the zorina. The meredithe is callow. The meredithe is baffled. The meredithe is sundried. The meredithe is desirous. The meredithe is continuant. The meredithe emaciate the zorina. The meredithe squint the zorina. If something interleave the zorina then it emaciate the zorina. If something squint the zorina and the zorina interleave the meredithe then it emaciate the zorina. If something is desirous and it interleave the zorina then the zorina is desirous. If something is desirous and it interleave the meredithe then it squint the meredithe. If the zorina is continuant and the zorina interleave the meredithe then the zorina squint the meredithe. If something is sundried and it interleave the meredithe then the meredithe is sundried. If something is sundried and continuant then it interleave the meredithe. If something is baffled then it squint the zorina. The meredithe does not eat the meredithe.", "logic": "\nInterleave(zorina, meredithe)\nCallow(zorina)\nSundried(zorina)\nDesirous(zorina)\nContinuant(zorina)\nEmaciate(zorina, meredithe)\nSquint(zorina, meredithe)\nInterleave(meredithe, zorina)\nCallow(meredithe)\nBaffled(meredithe)\nSundried(meredithe)\nDesirous(meredithe)\nContinuant(meredithe)\nEmaciate(meredithe, zorina)\nSquint(meredithe, zorina)\nforall x (Interleave(x, zorina) -> Emaciate(x, zorina))\nforall x (Squint(x, zorina) and Interleave(zorina, meredithe) -> Emaciate(x, zorina))\nforall x (Desirous(x) and Interleave(x, zorina) -> Desirous(zorina))\nforall x (Desirous(x) and Interleave(x, meredithe) -> Squint(x, meredithe))\nContinuant(zorina) and Interleave(zorina, meredithe) -> Squint(zorina, meredithe)\nforall x (Sundried(x) and Interleave(x, meredithe) -> Sundried(meredithe))\nforall x (Sundried(x) and Continuant(x) -> Interleave(x, meredithe))\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Squint(x, zorina))\n\nnot Interleave(meredithe, meredithe)\n\nSundried(meredithe) and Continuant(meredithe) and forall x (Sundried(x) and Continuant(x) -> Interleave(x, meredithe)) -> therefore Interleave(meredithe, meredithe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The mareah envelop the lishe. The mareah is noncrucial. The mareah is suckled. The mareah is indurate. The mareah is bicornate. The mareah refuse the lishe. The mareah injure the lishe. The lishe envelop the mareah. The lishe is noncrucial. The lishe is unstinting. The lishe is suckled. The lishe is indurate. The lishe is bicornate. The lishe refuse the mareah. The lishe injure the mareah. If something envelop the mareah then it refuse the mareah. If something injure the mareah and the mareah envelop the lishe then it refuse the mareah. If something is indurate and it envelop the mareah then the mareah is indurate. If something is indurate and it envelop the lishe then it injure the lishe. If the mareah is bicornate and the mareah envelop the lishe then the mareah injure the lishe. If something is suckled and it envelop the lishe then the lishe is suckled. If something is suckled and bicornate then it envelop the lishe. If something is unstinting then it injure the mareah. The lishe injure the lishe.", "logic": "\nEnvelop(mareah, lishe)\nNoncrucial(mareah)\nSuckled(mareah)\nIndurate(mareah)\nBicornate(mareah)\nRefuse(mareah, lishe)\nInjure(mareah, lishe)\nEnvelop(lishe, mareah)\nNoncrucial(lishe)\nUnstinting(lishe)\nSuckled(lishe)\nIndurate(lishe)\nBicornate(lishe)\nRefuse(lishe, mareah)\nInjure(lishe, mareah)\nforall x (Envelop(x, mareah) -> Refuse(x, mareah))\nforall x (Injure(x, mareah) and Envelop(mareah, lishe) -> Refuse(x, mareah))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Envelop(x, mareah) -> Indurate(mareah))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Envelop(x, lishe) -> Injure(x, lishe))\nBicornate(mareah) and Envelop(mareah, lishe) -> Injure(mareah, lishe)\nforall x (Suckled(x) and Envelop(x, lishe) -> Suckled(lishe))\nforall x (Suckled(x) and Bicornate(x) -> Envelop(x, lishe))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Injure(x, mareah))\n\nInjure(lishe, lishe)\n\nSuckled(lishe) and Bicornate(lishe) and forall x (Suckled(x) and Bicornate(x) -> Envelop(x, lishe)) -> therefore Envelop(lishe, lishe) Indurate(lishe) and Envelop(lishe, lishe) and forall x (Indurate(x) and Envelop(x, lishe) -> Injure(x, lishe)) -> therefore Injure(lishe, lishe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The kelcey expatiate the donald. The kelcey is ammonitic. The kelcey is albitic. The kelcey is erroneous. The kelcey is unsafe. The kelcey cloud the donald. The kelcey mothproof the donald. The donald expatiate the kelcey. The donald is ammonitic. The donald is nucleated. The donald is albitic. The donald is erroneous. The donald is unsafe. The donald cloud the kelcey. The donald mothproof the kelcey. If something expatiate the kelcey then it cloud the kelcey. If something mothproof the kelcey and the kelcey expatiate the donald then it cloud the kelcey. If something is erroneous and it expatiate the kelcey then the kelcey is erroneous. If something is erroneous and it expatiate the donald then it mothproof the donald. If the kelcey is unsafe and the kelcey expatiate the donald then the kelcey mothproof the donald. If something is albitic and it expatiate the donald then the donald is albitic. If something is albitic and unsafe then it expatiate the donald. If something is nucleated then it mothproof the kelcey. The donald does not visit the donald.", "logic": "\nExpatiate(kelcey, donald)\nAmmonitic(kelcey)\nAlbitic(kelcey)\nErroneous(kelcey)\nUnsafe(kelcey)\nCloud(kelcey, donald)\nMothproof(kelcey, donald)\nExpatiate(donald, kelcey)\nAmmonitic(donald)\nNucleated(donald)\nAlbitic(donald)\nErroneous(donald)\nUnsafe(donald)\nCloud(donald, kelcey)\nMothproof(donald, kelcey)\nforall x (Expatiate(x, kelcey) -> Cloud(x, kelcey))\nforall x (Mothproof(x, kelcey) and Expatiate(kelcey, donald) -> Cloud(x, kelcey))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) and Expatiate(x, kelcey) -> Erroneous(kelcey))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) and Expatiate(x, donald) -> Mothproof(x, donald))\nUnsafe(kelcey) and Expatiate(kelcey, donald) -> Mothproof(kelcey, donald)\nforall x (Albitic(x) and Expatiate(x, donald) -> Albitic(donald))\nforall x (Albitic(x) and Unsafe(x) -> Expatiate(x, donald))\nforall x (Nucleated(x) -> Mothproof(x, kelcey))\n\nnot Mothproof(donald, donald)\n\nAlbitic(donald) and Unsafe(donald) and forall x (Albitic(x) and Unsafe(x) -> Expatiate(x, donald)) -> therefore Expatiate(donald, donald) Erroneous(donald) and Expatiate(donald, donald) and forall x (Erroneous(x) and Expatiate(x, donald) -> Mothproof(x, donald)) -> therefore Mothproof(donald, donald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The dunstan samba the bellamy. The dunstan is apathetic. The dunstan is norwegian. The dunstan is calced. The dunstan is skint. The dunstan pipe the bellamy. The dunstan broadcast the bellamy. The bellamy samba the dunstan. The bellamy is apathetic. The bellamy is raisable. The bellamy is norwegian. The bellamy is calced. The bellamy is skint. The bellamy pipe the dunstan. The bellamy broadcast the dunstan. If something samba the dunstan then it pipe the dunstan. If something broadcast the dunstan and the dunstan samba the bellamy then it pipe the dunstan. If something is calced and it samba the dunstan then the dunstan is calced. If something is calced and it samba the bellamy then it broadcast the bellamy. If the dunstan is skint and the dunstan samba the bellamy then the dunstan broadcast the bellamy. If something is norwegian and it samba the bellamy then the bellamy is norwegian. If something is norwegian and skint then it samba the bellamy. If something is raisable then it broadcast the dunstan. The dunstan does not see the dunstan.", "logic": "\nSamba(dunstan, bellamy)\nApathetic(dunstan)\nNorwegian(dunstan)\nCalced(dunstan)\nSkint(dunstan)\nPipe(dunstan, bellamy)\nBroadcast(dunstan, bellamy)\nSamba(bellamy, dunstan)\nApathetic(bellamy)\nRaisable(bellamy)\nNorwegian(bellamy)\nCalced(bellamy)\nSkint(bellamy)\nPipe(bellamy, dunstan)\nBroadcast(bellamy, dunstan)\nforall x (Samba(x, dunstan) -> Pipe(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Broadcast(x, dunstan) and Samba(dunstan, bellamy) -> Pipe(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Calced(x) and Samba(x, dunstan) -> Calced(dunstan))\nforall x (Calced(x) and Samba(x, bellamy) -> Broadcast(x, bellamy))\nSkint(dunstan) and Samba(dunstan, bellamy) -> Broadcast(dunstan, bellamy)\nforall x (Norwegian(x) and Samba(x, bellamy) -> Norwegian(bellamy))\nforall x (Norwegian(x) and Skint(x) -> Samba(x, bellamy))\nforall x (Raisable(x) -> Broadcast(x, dunstan))\n\nnot Pipe(dunstan, dunstan)\n\nforall x (Broadcast(x, dunstan) and Samba(dunstan, bellamy) -> Pipe(x, dunstan)) <- forall x (Raisable(x) -> Broadcast(x, dunstan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The collette overhang the clair. The collette is basidial. The collette is disheveled. The collette is tacit. The collette is accurate. The collette second the clair. The collette discommode the clair. The clair overhang the collette. The clair is basidial. The clair is zapotec. The clair is disheveled. The clair is tacit. The clair is accurate. The clair second the collette. The clair discommode the collette. If something overhang the collette then it second the collette. If something discommode the collette and the collette overhang the clair then it second the collette. If something is tacit and it overhang the collette then the collette is tacit. If something is tacit and it overhang the clair then it discommode the clair. If the collette is accurate and the collette overhang the clair then the collette discommode the clair. If something is disheveled and it overhang the clair then the clair is disheveled. If something is disheveled and accurate then it overhang the clair. If something is zapotec then it discommode the collette. The collette discommode the collette.", "logic": "\nOverhang(collette, clair)\nBasidial(collette)\nDisheveled(collette)\nTacit(collette)\nAccurate(collette)\nSecond(collette, clair)\nDiscommode(collette, clair)\nOverhang(clair, collette)\nBasidial(clair)\nZapotec(clair)\nDisheveled(clair)\nTacit(clair)\nAccurate(clair)\nSecond(clair, collette)\nDiscommode(clair, collette)\nforall x (Overhang(x, collette) -> Second(x, collette))\nforall x (Discommode(x, collette) and Overhang(collette, clair) -> Second(x, collette))\nforall x (Tacit(x) and Overhang(x, collette) -> Tacit(collette))\nforall x (Tacit(x) and Overhang(x, clair) -> Discommode(x, clair))\nAccurate(collette) and Overhang(collette, clair) -> Discommode(collette, clair)\nforall x (Disheveled(x) and Overhang(x, clair) -> Disheveled(clair))\nforall x (Disheveled(x) and Accurate(x) -> Overhang(x, clair))\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Discommode(x, collette))\n\nDiscommode(collette, collette)\n\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Discommode(x, collette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The turner unpick the margalo. The turner is affable. The turner is waking. The turner is unfounded. The turner is allowable. The turner bestir the margalo. The turner codify the margalo. The margalo unpick the turner. The margalo is affable. The margalo is pomaded. The margalo is waking. The margalo is unfounded. The margalo is allowable. The margalo bestir the turner. The margalo codify the turner. If something unpick the turner then it bestir the turner. If something codify the turner and the turner unpick the margalo then it bestir the turner. If something is unfounded and it unpick the turner then the turner is unfounded. If something is unfounded and it unpick the margalo then it codify the margalo. If the turner is allowable and the turner unpick the margalo then the turner codify the margalo. If something is waking and it unpick the margalo then the margalo is waking. If something is waking and allowable then it unpick the margalo. If something is pomaded then it codify the turner. The margalo does not see the margalo.", "logic": "\nUnpick(turner, margalo)\nAffable(turner)\nWaking(turner)\nUnfounded(turner)\nAllowable(turner)\nBestir(turner, margalo)\nCodify(turner, margalo)\nUnpick(margalo, turner)\nAffable(margalo)\nPomaded(margalo)\nWaking(margalo)\nUnfounded(margalo)\nAllowable(margalo)\nBestir(margalo, turner)\nCodify(margalo, turner)\nforall x (Unpick(x, turner) -> Bestir(x, turner))\nforall x (Codify(x, turner) and Unpick(turner, margalo) -> Bestir(x, turner))\nforall x (Unfounded(x) and Unpick(x, turner) -> Unfounded(turner))\nforall x (Unfounded(x) and Unpick(x, margalo) -> Codify(x, margalo))\nAllowable(turner) and Unpick(turner, margalo) -> Codify(turner, margalo)\nforall x (Waking(x) and Unpick(x, margalo) -> Waking(margalo))\nforall x (Waking(x) and Allowable(x) -> Unpick(x, margalo))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) -> Codify(x, turner))\n\nnot Bestir(margalo, margalo)\n\nnot Bestir(margalo, margalo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "The anetta book the llewellyn. The anetta is swaybacked. The anetta is analgesic. The anetta is amazing. The anetta is idempotent. The anetta modulate the llewellyn. The anetta satellite the llewellyn. The llewellyn book the anetta. The llewellyn is swaybacked. The llewellyn is agone. The llewellyn is analgesic. The llewellyn is amazing. The llewellyn is idempotent. The llewellyn modulate the anetta. The llewellyn satellite the anetta. If something book the anetta then it modulate the anetta. If something satellite the anetta and the anetta book the llewellyn then it modulate the anetta. If something is amazing and it book the anetta then the anetta is amazing. If something is amazing and it book the llewellyn then it satellite the llewellyn. If the anetta is idempotent and the anetta book the llewellyn then the anetta satellite the llewellyn. If something is analgesic and it book the llewellyn then the llewellyn is analgesic. If something is analgesic and idempotent then it book the llewellyn. If something is agone then it satellite the anetta. The anetta book the anetta.", "logic": "\nBook(anetta, llewellyn)\nSwaybacked(anetta)\nAnalgesic(anetta)\nAmazing(anetta)\nIdempotent(anetta)\nModulate(anetta, llewellyn)\nSatellite(anetta, llewellyn)\nBook(llewellyn, anetta)\nSwaybacked(llewellyn)\nAgone(llewellyn)\nAnalgesic(llewellyn)\nAmazing(llewellyn)\nIdempotent(llewellyn)\nModulate(llewellyn, anetta)\nSatellite(llewellyn, anetta)\nforall x (Book(x, anetta) -> Modulate(x, anetta))\nforall x (Satellite(x, anetta) and Book(anetta, llewellyn) -> Modulate(x, anetta))\nforall x (Amazing(x) and Book(x, anetta) -> Amazing(anetta))\nforall x (Amazing(x) and Book(x, llewellyn) -> Satellite(x, llewellyn))\nIdempotent(anetta) and Book(anetta, llewellyn) -> Satellite(anetta, llewellyn)\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and Book(x, llewellyn) -> Analgesic(llewellyn))\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and Idempotent(x) -> Book(x, llewellyn))\nforall x (Agone(x) -> Satellite(x, anetta))\n\nBook(anetta, anetta)\n\nBook(anetta, anetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1520"} {"premises": "Alyce is hedonistic. Alyce is contrasty. Alyce is unbound. All hedonistic, grueling things are leavened. All contrasty things are leavened. All leavened things are grueling. If something is leavened and contrasty then it is not accusive. If something is unbound and not grueling then it is not accusive. If something is leavened and not contrasty then it is not accusive. Alyce is hedonistic.", "logic": "\nHedonistic(alyce)\nContrasty(alyce)\nUnbound(alyce)\nforall x (Hedonistic(x) and Grueling(x) -> Leavened(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Leavened(x))\nforall x (Leavened(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Leavened(x) and Contrasty(x) -> not Accusive(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) and not Grueling(x) -> not Accusive(x))\nforall x (Leavened(x) and not Contrasty(x) -> not Accusive(x))\n\nHedonistic(alyce)\n\ntherefore Hedonistic(alyce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Davin is nonionic. Davin is graduated. Davin is falcate. All nonionic, genitive things are wrecked. All graduated things are wrecked. All wrecked things are genitive. If something is wrecked and graduated then it is not unseeable. If something is falcate and not genitive then it is not unseeable. If something is wrecked and not graduated then it is not unseeable. Davin is not graduated.", "logic": "\nNonionic(davin)\nGraduated(davin)\nFalcate(davin)\nforall x (Nonionic(x) and Genitive(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Graduated(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> Genitive(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) and Graduated(x) -> not Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) and not Genitive(x) -> not Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) and not Graduated(x) -> not Unseeable(x))\n\nnot Graduated(davin)\n\ntherefore Graduated(davin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Nonah is dear. Nonah is jerky. Nonah is forward. All dear, numerical things are practised. All jerky things are practised. All practised things are numerical. If something is practised and jerky then it is not soundable. If something is forward and not numerical then it is not soundable. If something is practised and not jerky then it is not soundable. Nonah is practised.", "logic": "\nDear(nonah)\nJerky(nonah)\nForward(nonah)\nforall x (Dear(x) and Numerical(x) -> Practised(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) -> Practised(x))\nforall x (Practised(x) -> Numerical(x))\nforall x (Practised(x) and Jerky(x) -> not Soundable(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) and not Numerical(x) -> not Soundable(x))\nforall x (Practised(x) and not Jerky(x) -> not Soundable(x))\n\nPractised(nonah)\n\nJerky(nonah) and forall x (Jerky(x) -> Practised(x)) -> therefore Practised(nonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Cassondra is florid. Cassondra is hoary. Cassondra is slavic. All florid, haunting things are lentic. All hoary things are lentic. All lentic things are haunting. If something is lentic and hoary then it is not onomastic. If something is slavic and not haunting then it is not onomastic. If something is lentic and not hoary then it is not onomastic. Cassondra is not lentic.", "logic": "\nFlorid(cassondra)\nHoary(cassondra)\nSlavic(cassondra)\nforall x (Florid(x) and Haunting(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Hoary(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Haunting(x))\nforall x (Lentic(x) and Hoary(x) -> not Onomastic(x))\nforall x (Slavic(x) and not Haunting(x) -> not Onomastic(x))\nforall x (Lentic(x) and not Hoary(x) -> not Onomastic(x))\n\nnot Lentic(cassondra)\n\nHoary(cassondra) and forall x (Hoary(x) -> Lentic(x)) -> therefore Lentic(cassondra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Jervis is ponderous. Jervis is cunning. Jervis is gray. All ponderous, said things are amusive. All cunning things are amusive. All amusive things are said. If something is amusive and cunning then it is not organized. If something is gray and not said then it is not organized. If something is amusive and not cunning then it is not organized. Jervis is not organized.", "logic": "\nPonderous(jervis)\nCunning(jervis)\nGray(jervis)\nforall x (Ponderous(x) and Said(x) -> Amusive(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Amusive(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Said(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) and Cunning(x) -> not Organized(x))\nforall x (Gray(x) and not Said(x) -> not Organized(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) and not Cunning(x) -> not Organized(x))\n\nnot Organized(jervis)\n\nCunning(jervis) and forall x (Cunning(x) -> Amusive(x)) -> therefore Amusive(jervis) Amusive(jervis) and Cunning(jervis) and forall x (Amusive(x) and Cunning(x) -> not Organized(x)) -> therefore not Organized(jervis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Mufi is craven. Mufi is unreadable. Mufi is riotous. All craven, boisterous things are abridged. All unreadable things are abridged. All abridged things are boisterous. If something is abridged and unreadable then it is not sanitised. If something is riotous and not boisterous then it is not sanitised. If something is abridged and not unreadable then it is not sanitised. Mufi is sanitised.", "logic": "\nCraven(mufi)\nUnreadable(mufi)\nRiotous(mufi)\nforall x (Craven(x) and Boisterous(x) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Unreadable(x) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Boisterous(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) and Unreadable(x) -> not Sanitised(x))\nforall x (Riotous(x) and not Boisterous(x) -> not Sanitised(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) and not Unreadable(x) -> not Sanitised(x))\n\nSanitised(mufi)\n\nUnreadable(mufi) and forall x (Unreadable(x) -> Abridged(x)) -> therefore Abridged(mufi) Abridged(mufi) and Unreadable(mufi) and forall x (Abridged(x) and Unreadable(x) -> not Sanitised(x)) -> therefore not Sanitised(mufi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-209"} {"premises": "Valli is besotted. Axel is moldovan. Nicolas is uncrossed. If something is infallible and moldovan then it is swollen. If something is infallible and swollen then it is besotted. All moldovan things are mouthlike. If Axel is infallible and Axel is swollen then Axel is moldovan. If something is uncrossed and moldovan then it is swollen. If Valli is swollen and Valli is uncrossed then Valli is besotted. Green things are infallible. If something is uncrossed then it is besotted. Nicolas is uncrossed.", "logic": "\nBesotted(valli)\nMoldovan(axel)\nUncrossed(nicolas)\nforall x (Infallible(x) and Moldovan(x) -> Swollen(x))\nforall x (Infallible(x) and Swollen(x) -> Besotted(x))\nforall x (Moldovan(x) -> Mouthlike(x))\nInfallible(axel) and Swollen(axel) -> Moldovan(axel)\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) and Moldovan(x) -> Swollen(x))\nSwollen(valli) and Uncrossed(valli) -> Besotted(valli)\nforall x (Besotted(x) -> Infallible(x))\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) -> Besotted(x))\n\nUncrossed(nicolas)\n\ntherefore Uncrossed(nicolas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Mikhail is intrepid. Debbi is landless. Zondra is unvented. If something is mesodermal and landless then it is starchless. If something is mesodermal and starchless then it is intrepid. All landless things are inculpable. If Debbi is mesodermal and Debbi is starchless then Debbi is landless. If something is unvented and landless then it is starchless. If Mikhail is starchless and Mikhail is unvented then Mikhail is intrepid. Green things are mesodermal. If something is unvented then it is intrepid. Zondra is not unvented.", "logic": "\nIntrepid(mikhail)\nLandless(debbi)\nUnvented(zondra)\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Landless(x) -> Starchless(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Starchless(x) -> Intrepid(x))\nforall x (Landless(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nMesodermal(debbi) and Starchless(debbi) -> Landless(debbi)\nforall x (Unvented(x) and Landless(x) -> Starchless(x))\nStarchless(mikhail) and Unvented(mikhail) -> Intrepid(mikhail)\nforall x (Intrepid(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Unvented(x) -> Intrepid(x))\n\nnot Unvented(zondra)\n\ntherefore Unvented(zondra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Nate is inerrant. Carmel is unlabelled. Carina is knowing. If something is untouched and unlabelled then it is mastered. If something is untouched and mastered then it is inerrant. All unlabelled things are cometic. If Carmel is untouched and Carmel is mastered then Carmel is unlabelled. If something is knowing and unlabelled then it is mastered. If Nate is mastered and Nate is knowing then Nate is inerrant. Green things are untouched. If something is knowing then it is inerrant. Carmel is cometic.", "logic": "\nInerrant(nate)\nUnlabelled(carmel)\nKnowing(carina)\nforall x (Untouched(x) and Unlabelled(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Untouched(x) and Mastered(x) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Unlabelled(x) -> Cometic(x))\nUntouched(carmel) and Mastered(carmel) -> Unlabelled(carmel)\nforall x (Knowing(x) and Unlabelled(x) -> Mastered(x))\nMastered(nate) and Knowing(nate) -> Inerrant(nate)\nforall x (Inerrant(x) -> Untouched(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Inerrant(x))\n\nCometic(carmel)\n\nUnlabelled(carmel) and forall x (Unlabelled(x) -> Cometic(x)) -> therefore Cometic(carmel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Cristin is partitive. Anitra is unapparent. Jacquetta is myopic. If something is carmelite and unapparent then it is collusive. If something is carmelite and collusive then it is partitive. All unapparent things are amateur. If Anitra is carmelite and Anitra is collusive then Anitra is unapparent. If something is myopic and unapparent then it is collusive. If Cristin is collusive and Cristin is myopic then Cristin is partitive. Green things are carmelite. If something is myopic then it is partitive. Anitra is not amateur.", "logic": "\nPartitive(cristin)\nUnapparent(anitra)\nMyopic(jacquetta)\nforall x (Carmelite(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Carmelite(x) and Collusive(x) -> Partitive(x))\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> Amateur(x))\nCarmelite(anitra) and Collusive(anitra) -> Unapparent(anitra)\nforall x (Myopic(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Collusive(x))\nCollusive(cristin) and Myopic(cristin) -> Partitive(cristin)\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Myopic(x) -> Partitive(x))\n\nnot Amateur(anitra)\n\nUnapparent(anitra) and forall x (Unapparent(x) -> Amateur(x)) -> therefore Amateur(anitra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Klarika is bodacious. Tawsha is jewelled. Wildon is spic. If something is vatic and jewelled then it is abroad. If something is vatic and abroad then it is bodacious. All jewelled things are unsaleable. If Tawsha is vatic and Tawsha is abroad then Tawsha is jewelled. If something is spic and jewelled then it is abroad. If Klarika is abroad and Klarika is spic then Klarika is bodacious. Green things are vatic. If something is spic then it is bodacious. Wildon is vatic.", "logic": "\nBodacious(klarika)\nJewelled(tawsha)\nSpic(wildon)\nforall x (Vatic(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Abroad(x))\nforall x (Vatic(x) and Abroad(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Unsaleable(x))\nVatic(tawsha) and Abroad(tawsha) -> Jewelled(tawsha)\nforall x (Spic(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Abroad(x))\nAbroad(klarika) and Spic(klarika) -> Bodacious(klarika)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Vatic(x))\nforall x (Spic(x) -> Bodacious(x))\n\nVatic(wildon)\n\nSpic(wildon) and forall x (Spic(x) -> Bodacious(x)) -> therefore Bodacious(wildon) Bodacious(wildon) and forall x (Bodacious(x) -> Vatic(x)) -> therefore Vatic(wildon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Horatius is spumy. Shoshana is genealogic. Clarisa is dantean. If something is uncertain and genealogic then it is starry. If something is uncertain and starry then it is spumy. All genealogic things are backhand. If Shoshana is uncertain and Shoshana is starry then Shoshana is genealogic. If something is dantean and genealogic then it is starry. If Horatius is starry and Horatius is dantean then Horatius is spumy. Green things are uncertain. If something is dantean then it is spumy. Clarisa is not uncertain.", "logic": "\nSpumy(horatius)\nGenealogic(shoshana)\nDantean(clarisa)\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and Genealogic(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and Starry(x) -> Spumy(x))\nforall x (Genealogic(x) -> Backhand(x))\nUncertain(shoshana) and Starry(shoshana) -> Genealogic(shoshana)\nforall x (Dantean(x) and Genealogic(x) -> Starry(x))\nStarry(horatius) and Dantean(horatius) -> Spumy(horatius)\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Dantean(x) -> Spumy(x))\n\nnot Uncertain(clarisa)\n\nDantean(clarisa) and forall x (Dantean(x) -> Spumy(x)) -> therefore Spumy(clarisa) Spumy(clarisa) and forall x (Spumy(x) -> Uncertain(x)) -> therefore Uncertain(clarisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Lilli is repeatable. Tommy is uptight. Lebbie is slanted. If something is floodlit and uptight then it is vested. If something is floodlit and vested then it is repeatable. All uptight things are collegiate. If Tommy is floodlit and Tommy is vested then Tommy is uptight. If something is slanted and uptight then it is vested. If Lilli is vested and Lilli is slanted then Lilli is repeatable. Green things are floodlit. If something is slanted then it is repeatable. Tommy is not floodlit.", "logic": "\nRepeatable(lilli)\nUptight(tommy)\nSlanted(lebbie)\nforall x (Floodlit(x) and Uptight(x) -> Vested(x))\nforall x (Floodlit(x) and Vested(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Uptight(x) -> Collegiate(x))\nFloodlit(tommy) and Vested(tommy) -> Uptight(tommy)\nforall x (Slanted(x) and Uptight(x) -> Vested(x))\nVested(lilli) and Slanted(lilli) -> Repeatable(lilli)\nforall x (Repeatable(x) -> Floodlit(x))\nforall x (Slanted(x) -> Repeatable(x))\n\nnot Floodlit(tommy)\n\nforall x (Repeatable(x) -> Floodlit(x)) <- forall x (Floodlit(x) and Vested(x) -> Repeatable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Thibaud is erratic. Ailyn is diestrual. Jenni is amyloidal. If something is umpteen and diestrual then it is humpbacked. If something is umpteen and humpbacked then it is erratic. All diestrual things are semidark. If Ailyn is umpteen and Ailyn is humpbacked then Ailyn is diestrual. If something is amyloidal and diestrual then it is humpbacked. If Thibaud is humpbacked and Thibaud is amyloidal then Thibaud is erratic. Green things are umpteen. If something is amyloidal then it is erratic. Jenni is humpbacked.", "logic": "\nErratic(thibaud)\nDiestrual(ailyn)\nAmyloidal(jenni)\nforall x (Umpteen(x) and Diestrual(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) and Humpbacked(x) -> Erratic(x))\nforall x (Diestrual(x) -> Semidark(x))\nUmpteen(ailyn) and Humpbacked(ailyn) -> Diestrual(ailyn)\nforall x (Amyloidal(x) and Diestrual(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nHumpbacked(thibaud) and Amyloidal(thibaud) -> Erratic(thibaud)\nforall x (Erratic(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Amyloidal(x) -> Erratic(x))\n\nHumpbacked(jenni)\n\nforall x (Umpteen(x) and Diestrual(x) -> Humpbacked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Helge is cathartic. Bethina is listed. Morty is seated. If something is woody and listed then it is dented. If something is woody and dented then it is cathartic. All listed things are agitated. If Bethina is woody and Bethina is dented then Bethina is listed. If something is seated and listed then it is dented. If Helge is dented and Helge is seated then Helge is cathartic. Green things are woody. If something is seated then it is cathartic. Bethina is not cathartic.", "logic": "\nCathartic(helge)\nListed(bethina)\nSeated(morty)\nforall x (Woody(x) and Listed(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Woody(x) and Dented(x) -> Cathartic(x))\nforall x (Listed(x) -> Agitated(x))\nWoody(bethina) and Dented(bethina) -> Listed(bethina)\nforall x (Seated(x) and Listed(x) -> Dented(x))\nDented(helge) and Seated(helge) -> Cathartic(helge)\nforall x (Cathartic(x) -> Woody(x))\nforall x (Seated(x) -> Cathartic(x))\n\nnot Cathartic(bethina)\n\nforall x (Woody(x) and Dented(x) -> Cathartic(x)) <- forall x (Cathartic(x) -> Woody(x)) <- forall x (Seated(x) -> Cathartic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Patsy is controlled. Dacey is idealistic. Fan is fuscous. If something is sneering and idealistic then it is queenly. If something is sneering and queenly then it is controlled. All idealistic things are liquescent. If Dacey is sneering and Dacey is queenly then Dacey is idealistic. If something is fuscous and idealistic then it is queenly. If Patsy is queenly and Patsy is fuscous then Patsy is controlled. Green things are sneering. If something is fuscous then it is controlled. Patsy is fuscous.", "logic": "\nControlled(patsy)\nIdealistic(dacey)\nFuscous(fan)\nforall x (Sneering(x) and Idealistic(x) -> Queenly(x))\nforall x (Sneering(x) and Queenly(x) -> Controlled(x))\nforall x (Idealistic(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nSneering(dacey) and Queenly(dacey) -> Idealistic(dacey)\nforall x (Fuscous(x) and Idealistic(x) -> Queenly(x))\nQueenly(patsy) and Fuscous(patsy) -> Controlled(patsy)\nforall x (Controlled(x) -> Sneering(x))\nforall x (Fuscous(x) -> Controlled(x))\n\nFuscous(patsy)\n\nFuscous(patsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Dotty is fascistic. Bjorne is sniffly. Andonis is bobtail. If something is smelling and sniffly then it is omissible. If something is smelling and omissible then it is fascistic. All sniffly things are craved. If Bjorne is smelling and Bjorne is omissible then Bjorne is sniffly. If something is bobtail and sniffly then it is omissible. If Dotty is omissible and Dotty is bobtail then Dotty is fascistic. Green things are smelling. If something is bobtail then it is fascistic. Andonis is not sniffly.", "logic": "\nFascistic(dotty)\nSniffly(bjorne)\nBobtail(andonis)\nforall x (Smelling(x) and Sniffly(x) -> Omissible(x))\nforall x (Smelling(x) and Omissible(x) -> Fascistic(x))\nforall x (Sniffly(x) -> Craved(x))\nSmelling(bjorne) and Omissible(bjorne) -> Sniffly(bjorne)\nforall x (Bobtail(x) and Sniffly(x) -> Omissible(x))\nOmissible(dotty) and Bobtail(dotty) -> Fascistic(dotty)\nforall x (Fascistic(x) -> Smelling(x))\nforall x (Bobtail(x) -> Fascistic(x))\n\nnot Sniffly(andonis)\n\nnot Sniffly(andonis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "Demetrius is mysterious. Nadine is uppish. Kata is coming. If something is demode and uppish then it is disruptive. If something is demode and disruptive then it is mysterious. All uppish things are prongy. If Nadine is demode and Nadine is disruptive then Nadine is uppish. If something is coming and uppish then it is disruptive. If Demetrius is disruptive and Demetrius is coming then Demetrius is mysterious. Green things are demode. If something is coming then it is mysterious. Kata is quiet.", "logic": "\nMysterious(demetrius)\nUppish(nadine)\nComing(kata)\nforall x (Demode(x) and Uppish(x) -> Disruptive(x))\nforall x (Demode(x) and Disruptive(x) -> Mysterious(x))\nforall x (Uppish(x) -> Prongy(x))\nDemode(nadine) and Disruptive(nadine) -> Uppish(nadine)\nforall x (Coming(x) and Uppish(x) -> Disruptive(x))\nDisruptive(demetrius) and Coming(demetrius) -> Mysterious(demetrius)\nforall x (Mysterious(x) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Coming(x) -> Mysterious(x))\n\nQuiet(kata)\n\nQuiet(kata) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-427"} {"premises": "The heida minister the rozamond. The heida minister the marchelle. The rozamond is homely. The rozamond is leafy. The rozamond forget the heida. The rozamond minister the marchelle. The marchelle renew the rozamond. The marchelle is homely. The marchelle is leafy. The marchelle forget the rozamond. The marchelle minister the heida. The marchelle minister the rozamond. If someone is leafy and maoist then they chase the rozamond. If someone renew the rozamond then the rozamond renew the marchelle. If someone is manx then they need the rozamond. If someone minister the heida and the heida renew the rozamond then the heida forget the rozamond. If someone minister the heida then the heida renew the marchelle. If someone renew the marchelle then the marchelle is seagoing. If someone minister the rozamond then the rozamond forget the heida. Green people are manx. The rozamond is homely.", "logic": "\nMinister(heida, rozamond)\nMinister(heida, marchelle)\nHomely(rozamond)\nLeafy(rozamond)\nForget(rozamond, heida)\nMinister(rozamond, marchelle)\nRenew(marchelle, rozamond)\nHomely(marchelle)\nLeafy(marchelle)\nForget(marchelle, rozamond)\nMinister(marchelle, heida)\nMinister(marchelle, rozamond)\nforall x (Leafy(x) and Maoist(x) -> Renew(x, rozamond))\nforall x (Renew(x, rozamond) -> Renew(rozamond, marchelle))\nforall x (Manx(x) -> Forget(x, rozamond))\nforall x (Minister(x, heida) and Renew(heida, rozamond) -> Forget(heida, rozamond))\nforall x (Minister(x, heida) -> Renew(heida, marchelle))\nforall x (Renew(x, marchelle) -> Seagoing(marchelle))\nforall x (Minister(x, rozamond) -> Forget(rozamond, heida))\nforall x (Homely(x) -> Manx(x))\n\nHomely(rozamond)\n\ntherefore Homely(rozamond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The mauritz extract the nari. The mauritz extract the stephana. The nari is baleful. The nari is endemic. The nari quickstep the mauritz. The nari extract the stephana. The stephana outflank the nari. The stephana is baleful. The stephana is endemic. The stephana quickstep the nari. The stephana extract the mauritz. The stephana extract the nari. If someone is endemic and epizootic then they chase the nari. If someone outflank the nari then the nari outflank the stephana. If someone is melodious then they need the nari. If someone extract the mauritz and the mauritz outflank the nari then the mauritz quickstep the nari. If someone extract the mauritz then the mauritz outflank the stephana. If someone outflank the stephana then the stephana is wingless. If someone extract the nari then the nari quickstep the mauritz. Green people are melodious. The mauritz does not see the stephana.", "logic": "\nExtract(mauritz, nari)\nExtract(mauritz, stephana)\nBaleful(nari)\nEndemic(nari)\nQuickstep(nari, mauritz)\nExtract(nari, stephana)\nOutflank(stephana, nari)\nBaleful(stephana)\nEndemic(stephana)\nQuickstep(stephana, nari)\nExtract(stephana, mauritz)\nExtract(stephana, nari)\nforall x (Endemic(x) and Epizootic(x) -> Outflank(x, nari))\nforall x (Outflank(x, nari) -> Outflank(nari, stephana))\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Quickstep(x, nari))\nforall x (Extract(x, mauritz) and Outflank(mauritz, nari) -> Quickstep(mauritz, nari))\nforall x (Extract(x, mauritz) -> Outflank(mauritz, stephana))\nforall x (Outflank(x, stephana) -> Wingless(stephana))\nforall x (Extract(x, nari) -> Quickstep(nari, mauritz))\nforall x (Baleful(x) -> Melodious(x))\n\nnot Extract(mauritz, stephana)\n\ntherefore Extract(mauritz, stephana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The lesley suppurate the torry. The lesley suppurate the maryrose. The torry is temptable. The torry is traitorous. The torry fend the lesley. The torry suppurate the maryrose. The maryrose crown the torry. The maryrose is temptable. The maryrose is traitorous. The maryrose fend the torry. The maryrose suppurate the lesley. The maryrose suppurate the torry. If someone is traitorous and madcap then they chase the torry. If someone crown the torry then the torry crown the maryrose. If someone is saxicolous then they need the torry. If someone suppurate the lesley and the lesley crown the torry then the lesley fend the torry. If someone suppurate the lesley then the lesley crown the maryrose. If someone crown the maryrose then the maryrose is lupine. If someone suppurate the torry then the torry fend the lesley. Green people are saxicolous. The lesley crown the maryrose.", "logic": "\nSuppurate(lesley, torry)\nSuppurate(lesley, maryrose)\nTemptable(torry)\nTraitorous(torry)\nFend(torry, lesley)\nSuppurate(torry, maryrose)\nCrown(maryrose, torry)\nTemptable(maryrose)\nTraitorous(maryrose)\nFend(maryrose, torry)\nSuppurate(maryrose, lesley)\nSuppurate(maryrose, torry)\nforall x (Traitorous(x) and Madcap(x) -> Crown(x, torry))\nforall x (Crown(x, torry) -> Crown(torry, maryrose))\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) -> Fend(x, torry))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, lesley) and Crown(lesley, torry) -> Fend(lesley, torry))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, lesley) -> Crown(lesley, maryrose))\nforall x (Crown(x, maryrose) -> Lupine(maryrose))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, torry) -> Fend(torry, lesley))\nforall x (Temptable(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\n\nCrown(lesley, maryrose)\n\nSuppurate(maryrose, lesley) and forall x (Suppurate(x, lesley) -> Crown(lesley, maryrose)) -> therefore Crown(lesley, maryrose)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The kalindi archaise the trent. The kalindi archaise the richie. The trent is branching. The trent is unfenced. The trent repeat the kalindi. The trent archaise the richie. The richie careen the trent. The richie is branching. The richie is unfenced. The richie repeat the trent. The richie archaise the kalindi. The richie archaise the trent. If someone is unfenced and posed then they chase the trent. If someone careen the trent then the trent careen the richie. If someone is venerable then they need the trent. If someone archaise the kalindi and the kalindi careen the trent then the kalindi repeat the trent. If someone archaise the kalindi then the kalindi careen the richie. If someone careen the richie then the richie is familial. If someone archaise the trent then the trent repeat the kalindi. Green people are venerable. The trent is not venerable.", "logic": "\nArchaise(kalindi, trent)\nArchaise(kalindi, richie)\nBranching(trent)\nUnfenced(trent)\nRepeat(trent, kalindi)\nArchaise(trent, richie)\nCareen(richie, trent)\nBranching(richie)\nUnfenced(richie)\nRepeat(richie, trent)\nArchaise(richie, kalindi)\nArchaise(richie, trent)\nforall x (Unfenced(x) and Posed(x) -> Careen(x, trent))\nforall x (Careen(x, trent) -> Careen(trent, richie))\nforall x (Venerable(x) -> Repeat(x, trent))\nforall x (Archaise(x, kalindi) and Careen(kalindi, trent) -> Repeat(kalindi, trent))\nforall x (Archaise(x, kalindi) -> Careen(kalindi, richie))\nforall x (Careen(x, richie) -> Familial(richie))\nforall x (Archaise(x, trent) -> Repeat(trent, kalindi))\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Venerable(x))\n\nnot Venerable(trent)\n\nBranching(trent) and forall x (Branching(x) -> Venerable(x)) -> therefore Venerable(trent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The englebart state the abagael. The englebart state the angelia. The abagael is epithelial. The abagael is blotto. The abagael overweary the englebart. The abagael state the angelia. The angelia reconfirm the abagael. The angelia is epithelial. The angelia is blotto. The angelia overweary the abagael. The angelia state the englebart. The angelia state the abagael. If someone is blotto and illusive then they chase the abagael. If someone reconfirm the abagael then the abagael reconfirm the angelia. If someone is ugandan then they need the abagael. If someone state the englebart and the englebart reconfirm the abagael then the englebart overweary the abagael. If someone state the englebart then the englebart reconfirm the angelia. If someone reconfirm the angelia then the angelia is actinoid. If someone state the abagael then the abagael overweary the englebart. Green people are ugandan. The abagael overweary the abagael.", "logic": "\nState(englebart, abagael)\nState(englebart, angelia)\nEpithelial(abagael)\nBlotto(abagael)\nOverweary(abagael, englebart)\nState(abagael, angelia)\nReconfirm(angelia, abagael)\nEpithelial(angelia)\nBlotto(angelia)\nOverweary(angelia, abagael)\nState(angelia, englebart)\nState(angelia, abagael)\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Illusive(x) -> Reconfirm(x, abagael))\nforall x (Reconfirm(x, abagael) -> Reconfirm(abagael, angelia))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) -> Overweary(x, abagael))\nforall x (State(x, englebart) and Reconfirm(englebart, abagael) -> Overweary(englebart, abagael))\nforall x (State(x, englebart) -> Reconfirm(englebart, angelia))\nforall x (Reconfirm(x, angelia) -> Actinoid(angelia))\nforall x (State(x, abagael) -> Overweary(abagael, englebart))\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> Ugandan(x))\n\nOverweary(abagael, abagael)\n\nEpithelial(abagael) and forall x (Epithelial(x) -> Ugandan(x)) -> therefore Ugandan(abagael) Ugandan(abagael) and forall x (Ugandan(x) -> Overweary(x, abagael)) -> therefore Overweary(abagael, abagael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The milicent blind the saundra. The milicent blind the giorgia. The saundra is needlelike. The saundra is timed. The saundra condone the milicent. The saundra blind the giorgia. The giorgia solidify the saundra. The giorgia is needlelike. The giorgia is timed. The giorgia condone the saundra. The giorgia blind the milicent. The giorgia blind the saundra. If someone is timed and bracteal then they chase the saundra. If someone solidify the saundra then the saundra solidify the giorgia. If someone is gambian then they need the saundra. If someone blind the milicent and the milicent solidify the saundra then the milicent condone the saundra. If someone blind the milicent then the milicent solidify the giorgia. If someone solidify the giorgia then the giorgia is niggling. If someone blind the saundra then the saundra condone the milicent. Green people are gambian. The saundra does not need the saundra.", "logic": "\nBlind(milicent, saundra)\nBlind(milicent, giorgia)\nNeedlelike(saundra)\nTimed(saundra)\nCondone(saundra, milicent)\nBlind(saundra, giorgia)\nSolidify(giorgia, saundra)\nNeedlelike(giorgia)\nTimed(giorgia)\nCondone(giorgia, saundra)\nBlind(giorgia, milicent)\nBlind(giorgia, saundra)\nforall x (Timed(x) and Bracteal(x) -> Solidify(x, saundra))\nforall x (Solidify(x, saundra) -> Solidify(saundra, giorgia))\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> Condone(x, saundra))\nforall x (Blind(x, milicent) and Solidify(milicent, saundra) -> Condone(milicent, saundra))\nforall x (Blind(x, milicent) -> Solidify(milicent, giorgia))\nforall x (Solidify(x, giorgia) -> Niggling(giorgia))\nforall x (Blind(x, saundra) -> Condone(saundra, milicent))\nforall x (Needlelike(x) -> Gambian(x))\n\nnot Condone(saundra, saundra)\n\nNeedlelike(saundra) and forall x (Needlelike(x) -> Gambian(x)) -> therefore Gambian(saundra) Gambian(saundra) and forall x (Gambian(x) -> Condone(x, saundra)) -> therefore Condone(saundra, saundra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The gerianna rout the hollie. The gerianna rout the madelyn. The hollie is slushy. The hollie is wrinkly. The hollie doss the gerianna. The hollie rout the madelyn. The madelyn mine the hollie. The madelyn is slushy. The madelyn is wrinkly. The madelyn doss the hollie. The madelyn rout the gerianna. The madelyn rout the hollie. If someone is wrinkly and unbraced then they chase the hollie. If someone mine the hollie then the hollie mine the madelyn. If someone is libertine then they need the hollie. If someone rout the gerianna and the gerianna mine the hollie then the gerianna doss the hollie. If someone rout the gerianna then the gerianna mine the madelyn. If someone mine the madelyn then the madelyn is haemic. If someone rout the hollie then the hollie doss the gerianna. Green people are libertine. The gerianna does not need the hollie.", "logic": "\nRout(gerianna, hollie)\nRout(gerianna, madelyn)\nSlushy(hollie)\nWrinkly(hollie)\nDoss(hollie, gerianna)\nRout(hollie, madelyn)\nMine(madelyn, hollie)\nSlushy(madelyn)\nWrinkly(madelyn)\nDoss(madelyn, hollie)\nRout(madelyn, gerianna)\nRout(madelyn, hollie)\nforall x (Wrinkly(x) and Unbraced(x) -> Mine(x, hollie))\nforall x (Mine(x, hollie) -> Mine(hollie, madelyn))\nforall x (Libertine(x) -> Doss(x, hollie))\nforall x (Rout(x, gerianna) and Mine(gerianna, hollie) -> Doss(gerianna, hollie))\nforall x (Rout(x, gerianna) -> Mine(gerianna, madelyn))\nforall x (Mine(x, madelyn) -> Haemic(madelyn))\nforall x (Rout(x, hollie) -> Doss(hollie, gerianna))\nforall x (Slushy(x) -> Libertine(x))\n\nnot Doss(gerianna, hollie)\n\nforall x (Libertine(x) -> Doss(x, hollie)) <- forall x (Slushy(x) -> Libertine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The camilla inlay the sheri. The camilla inlay the kelli. The sheri is boxy. The sheri is propellent. The sheri earn the camilla. The sheri inlay the kelli. The kelli reason the sheri. The kelli is boxy. The kelli is propellent. The kelli earn the sheri. The kelli inlay the camilla. The kelli inlay the sheri. If someone is propellent and senegalese then they chase the sheri. If someone reason the sheri then the sheri reason the kelli. If someone is flagrant then they need the sheri. If someone inlay the camilla and the camilla reason the sheri then the camilla earn the sheri. If someone inlay the camilla then the camilla reason the kelli. If someone reason the kelli then the kelli is lovely. If someone inlay the sheri then the sheri earn the camilla. Green people are flagrant. The sheri reason the sheri.", "logic": "\nInlay(camilla, sheri)\nInlay(camilla, kelli)\nBoxy(sheri)\nPropellent(sheri)\nEarn(sheri, camilla)\nInlay(sheri, kelli)\nReason(kelli, sheri)\nBoxy(kelli)\nPropellent(kelli)\nEarn(kelli, sheri)\nInlay(kelli, camilla)\nInlay(kelli, sheri)\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Senegalese(x) -> Reason(x, sheri))\nforall x (Reason(x, sheri) -> Reason(sheri, kelli))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Earn(x, sheri))\nforall x (Inlay(x, camilla) and Reason(camilla, sheri) -> Earn(camilla, sheri))\nforall x (Inlay(x, camilla) -> Reason(camilla, kelli))\nforall x (Reason(x, kelli) -> Lovely(kelli))\nforall x (Inlay(x, sheri) -> Earn(sheri, camilla))\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Flagrant(x))\n\nReason(sheri, sheri)\n\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Senegalese(x) -> Reason(x, sheri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The dulcea premise the welsh. The dulcea premise the silvan. The welsh is euphonous. The welsh is rimy. The welsh home the dulcea. The welsh premise the silvan. The silvan mound the welsh. The silvan is euphonous. The silvan is rimy. The silvan home the welsh. The silvan premise the dulcea. The silvan premise the welsh. If someone is rimy and watertight then they chase the welsh. If someone mound the welsh then the welsh mound the silvan. If someone is divinatory then they need the welsh. If someone premise the dulcea and the dulcea mound the welsh then the dulcea home the welsh. If someone premise the dulcea then the dulcea mound the silvan. If someone mound the silvan then the silvan is mouthlike. If someone premise the welsh then the welsh home the dulcea. Green people are divinatory. The dulcea does not chase the welsh.", "logic": "\nPremise(dulcea, welsh)\nPremise(dulcea, silvan)\nEuphonous(welsh)\nRimy(welsh)\nHome(welsh, dulcea)\nPremise(welsh, silvan)\nMound(silvan, welsh)\nEuphonous(silvan)\nRimy(silvan)\nHome(silvan, welsh)\nPremise(silvan, dulcea)\nPremise(silvan, welsh)\nforall x (Rimy(x) and Watertight(x) -> Mound(x, welsh))\nforall x (Mound(x, welsh) -> Mound(welsh, silvan))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) -> Home(x, welsh))\nforall x (Premise(x, dulcea) and Mound(dulcea, welsh) -> Home(dulcea, welsh))\nforall x (Premise(x, dulcea) -> Mound(dulcea, silvan))\nforall x (Mound(x, silvan) -> Mouthlike(silvan))\nforall x (Premise(x, welsh) -> Home(welsh, dulcea))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) -> Divinatory(x))\n\nnot Mound(dulcea, welsh)\n\nforall x (Rimy(x) and Watertight(x) -> Mound(x, welsh)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The sheppard coincide the elsinore. The sheppard coincide the gabrielle. The elsinore is falsetto. The elsinore is undogmatic. The elsinore blacktop the sheppard. The elsinore coincide the gabrielle. The gabrielle vermilion the elsinore. The gabrielle is falsetto. The gabrielle is undogmatic. The gabrielle blacktop the elsinore. The gabrielle coincide the sheppard. The gabrielle coincide the elsinore. If someone is undogmatic and outlaw then they chase the elsinore. If someone vermilion the elsinore then the elsinore vermilion the gabrielle. If someone is unladylike then they need the elsinore. If someone coincide the sheppard and the sheppard vermilion the elsinore then the sheppard blacktop the elsinore. If someone coincide the sheppard then the sheppard vermilion the gabrielle. If someone vermilion the gabrielle then the gabrielle is unbendable. If someone coincide the elsinore then the elsinore blacktop the sheppard. Green people are unladylike. The gabrielle vermilion the gabrielle.", "logic": "\nCoincide(sheppard, elsinore)\nCoincide(sheppard, gabrielle)\nFalsetto(elsinore)\nUndogmatic(elsinore)\nBlacktop(elsinore, sheppard)\nCoincide(elsinore, gabrielle)\nVermilion(gabrielle, elsinore)\nFalsetto(gabrielle)\nUndogmatic(gabrielle)\nBlacktop(gabrielle, elsinore)\nCoincide(gabrielle, sheppard)\nCoincide(gabrielle, elsinore)\nforall x (Undogmatic(x) and Outlaw(x) -> Vermilion(x, elsinore))\nforall x (Vermilion(x, elsinore) -> Vermilion(elsinore, gabrielle))\nforall x (Unladylike(x) -> Blacktop(x, elsinore))\nforall x (Coincide(x, sheppard) and Vermilion(sheppard, elsinore) -> Blacktop(sheppard, elsinore))\nforall x (Coincide(x, sheppard) -> Vermilion(sheppard, gabrielle))\nforall x (Vermilion(x, gabrielle) -> Unbendable(gabrielle))\nforall x (Coincide(x, elsinore) -> Blacktop(elsinore, sheppard))\nforall x (Falsetto(x) -> Unladylike(x))\n\nVermilion(gabrielle, gabrielle)\n\nVermilion(gabrielle, gabrielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The corri benday the milly. The corri benday the meris. The milly is surplus. The milly is edematous. The milly imperil the corri. The milly benday the meris. The meris pain the milly. The meris is surplus. The meris is edematous. The meris imperil the milly. The meris benday the corri. The meris benday the milly. If someone is edematous and bloodless then they chase the milly. If someone pain the milly then the milly pain the meris. If someone is hooved then they need the milly. If someone benday the corri and the corri pain the milly then the corri imperil the milly. If someone benday the corri then the corri pain the meris. If someone pain the meris then the meris is pneumonic. If someone benday the milly then the milly imperil the corri. Green people are hooved. The corri is not surplus.", "logic": "\nBenday(corri, milly)\nBenday(corri, meris)\nSurplus(milly)\nEdematous(milly)\nImperil(milly, corri)\nBenday(milly, meris)\nPain(meris, milly)\nSurplus(meris)\nEdematous(meris)\nImperil(meris, milly)\nBenday(meris, corri)\nBenday(meris, milly)\nforall x (Edematous(x) and Bloodless(x) -> Pain(x, milly))\nforall x (Pain(x, milly) -> Pain(milly, meris))\nforall x (Hooved(x) -> Imperil(x, milly))\nforall x (Benday(x, corri) and Pain(corri, milly) -> Imperil(corri, milly))\nforall x (Benday(x, corri) -> Pain(corri, meris))\nforall x (Pain(x, meris) -> Pneumonic(meris))\nforall x (Benday(x, milly) -> Imperil(milly, corri))\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Hooved(x))\n\nnot Surplus(corri)\n\nnot Surplus(corri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The blondell jubilate the ardelis. The blondell jubilate the graeme. The ardelis is admirable. The ardelis is citric. The ardelis flap the blondell. The ardelis jubilate the graeme. The graeme flick the ardelis. The graeme is admirable. The graeme is citric. The graeme flap the ardelis. The graeme jubilate the blondell. The graeme jubilate the ardelis. If someone is citric and fancied then they chase the ardelis. If someone flick the ardelis then the ardelis flick the graeme. If someone is citified then they need the ardelis. If someone jubilate the blondell and the blondell flick the ardelis then the blondell flap the ardelis. If someone jubilate the blondell then the blondell flick the graeme. If someone flick the graeme then the graeme is criterial. If someone jubilate the ardelis then the ardelis flap the blondell. Green people are citified. The blondell is criterial.", "logic": "\nJubilate(blondell, ardelis)\nJubilate(blondell, graeme)\nAdmirable(ardelis)\nCitric(ardelis)\nFlap(ardelis, blondell)\nJubilate(ardelis, graeme)\nFlick(graeme, ardelis)\nAdmirable(graeme)\nCitric(graeme)\nFlap(graeme, ardelis)\nJubilate(graeme, blondell)\nJubilate(graeme, ardelis)\nforall x (Citric(x) and Fancied(x) -> Flick(x, ardelis))\nforall x (Flick(x, ardelis) -> Flick(ardelis, graeme))\nforall x (Citified(x) -> Flap(x, ardelis))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, blondell) and Flick(blondell, ardelis) -> Flap(blondell, ardelis))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, blondell) -> Flick(blondell, graeme))\nforall x (Flick(x, graeme) -> Criterial(graeme))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, ardelis) -> Flap(ardelis, blondell))\nforall x (Admirable(x) -> Citified(x))\n\nCriterial(blondell)\n\nCriterial(blondell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The lilah is endemical. The lilah bastardize the kania. The lilah fluster the kania. The kania is kinky. The kania bastardize the mechelle. The kania bastardize the kamillah. The kania jazz the kamillah. The kania fluster the mechelle. The kania fluster the kamillah. The mechelle is endemical. The mechelle jazz the lilah. The mechelle fluster the kamillah. The kamillah is kinky. The kamillah is desecrated. The kamillah bastardize the mechelle. The kamillah jazz the lilah. If something fluster the kamillah then the kamillah fluster the kania. If the kamillah jazz the kania and the kania is desecrated then the kamillah bastardize the lilah. If something jazz the lilah then the lilah is endemical. If something is endemical then it fluster the kania. If something bastardize the kania and the kania jazz the lilah then it jazz the mechelle. If something jazz the mechelle then the mechelle fluster the kamillah. If the kania bastardize the lilah and the lilah fluster the mechelle then the kania jazz the lilah. If something fluster the kania then the kania jazz the lilah. The lilah is endemical.", "logic": "\nEndemical(lilah)\nBastardize(lilah, kania)\nFluster(lilah, kania)\nKinky(kania)\nBastardize(kania, mechelle)\nBastardize(kania, kamillah)\nJazz(kania, kamillah)\nFluster(kania, mechelle)\nFluster(kania, kamillah)\nEndemical(mechelle)\nJazz(mechelle, lilah)\nFluster(mechelle, kamillah)\nKinky(kamillah)\nDesecrated(kamillah)\nBastardize(kamillah, mechelle)\nJazz(kamillah, lilah)\nforall x (Fluster(x, kamillah) -> Fluster(kamillah, kania))\nJazz(kamillah, kania) and Desecrated(kania) -> Bastardize(kamillah, lilah)\nforall x (Jazz(x, lilah) -> Endemical(lilah))\nforall x (Endemical(x) -> Fluster(x, kania))\nforall x (Bastardize(x, kania) and Jazz(kania, lilah) -> Jazz(x, mechelle))\nforall x (Jazz(x, mechelle) -> Fluster(mechelle, kamillah))\nBastardize(kania, lilah) and Fluster(lilah, mechelle) -> Jazz(kania, lilah)\nforall x (Fluster(x, kania) -> Jazz(kania, lilah))\n\nEndemical(lilah)\n\ntherefore Endemical(lilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The daryl is flightless. The daryl cage the nan. The daryl well the nan. The nan is asserting. The nan cage the noland. The nan cage the robenia. The nan originate the robenia. The nan well the noland. The nan well the robenia. The noland is flightless. The noland originate the daryl. The noland well the robenia. The robenia is asserting. The robenia is apraxic. The robenia cage the noland. The robenia originate the daryl. If something well the robenia then the robenia well the nan. If the robenia originate the nan and the nan is apraxic then the robenia cage the daryl. If something originate the daryl then the daryl is flightless. If something is flightless then it well the nan. If something cage the nan and the nan originate the daryl then it originate the noland. If something originate the noland then the noland well the robenia. If the nan cage the daryl and the daryl well the noland then the nan originate the daryl. If something well the nan then the nan originate the daryl. The nan does not like the noland.", "logic": "\nFlightless(daryl)\nCage(daryl, nan)\nWell(daryl, nan)\nAsserting(nan)\nCage(nan, noland)\nCage(nan, robenia)\nOriginate(nan, robenia)\nWell(nan, noland)\nWell(nan, robenia)\nFlightless(noland)\nOriginate(noland, daryl)\nWell(noland, robenia)\nAsserting(robenia)\nApraxic(robenia)\nCage(robenia, noland)\nOriginate(robenia, daryl)\nforall x (Well(x, robenia) -> Well(robenia, nan))\nOriginate(robenia, nan) and Apraxic(nan) -> Cage(robenia, daryl)\nforall x (Originate(x, daryl) -> Flightless(daryl))\nforall x (Flightless(x) -> Well(x, nan))\nforall x (Cage(x, nan) and Originate(nan, daryl) -> Originate(x, noland))\nforall x (Originate(x, noland) -> Well(noland, robenia))\nCage(nan, daryl) and Well(daryl, noland) -> Originate(nan, daryl)\nforall x (Well(x, nan) -> Originate(nan, daryl))\n\nnot Cage(nan, noland)\n\ntherefore Cage(nan, noland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The celestyn is ambitious. The celestyn trench the rana. The celestyn refit the rana. The rana is spongy. The rana trench the grayce. The rana trench the dianna. The rana riposte the dianna. The rana refit the grayce. The rana refit the dianna. The grayce is ambitious. The grayce riposte the celestyn. The grayce refit the dianna. The dianna is spongy. The dianna is algal. The dianna trench the grayce. The dianna riposte the celestyn. If something refit the dianna then the dianna refit the rana. If the dianna riposte the rana and the rana is algal then the dianna trench the celestyn. If something riposte the celestyn then the celestyn is ambitious. If something is ambitious then it refit the rana. If something trench the rana and the rana riposte the celestyn then it riposte the grayce. If something riposte the grayce then the grayce refit the dianna. If the rana trench the celestyn and the celestyn refit the grayce then the rana riposte the celestyn. If something refit the rana then the rana riposte the celestyn. The rana riposte the celestyn.", "logic": "\nAmbitious(celestyn)\nTrench(celestyn, rana)\nRefit(celestyn, rana)\nSpongy(rana)\nTrench(rana, grayce)\nTrench(rana, dianna)\nRiposte(rana, dianna)\nRefit(rana, grayce)\nRefit(rana, dianna)\nAmbitious(grayce)\nRiposte(grayce, celestyn)\nRefit(grayce, dianna)\nSpongy(dianna)\nAlgal(dianna)\nTrench(dianna, grayce)\nRiposte(dianna, celestyn)\nforall x (Refit(x, dianna) -> Refit(dianna, rana))\nRiposte(dianna, rana) and Algal(rana) -> Trench(dianna, celestyn)\nforall x (Riposte(x, celestyn) -> Ambitious(celestyn))\nforall x (Ambitious(x) -> Refit(x, rana))\nforall x (Trench(x, rana) and Riposte(rana, celestyn) -> Riposte(x, grayce))\nforall x (Riposte(x, grayce) -> Refit(grayce, dianna))\nTrench(rana, celestyn) and Refit(celestyn, grayce) -> Riposte(rana, celestyn)\nforall x (Refit(x, rana) -> Riposte(rana, celestyn))\n\nRiposte(rana, celestyn)\n\nRefit(celestyn, rana) and forall x (Refit(x, rana) -> Riposte(rana, celestyn)) -> therefore Riposte(rana, celestyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The sayer is emotional. The sayer outride the sheila. The sayer siss the sheila. The sheila is insistent. The sheila outride the gloriana. The sheila outride the mervin. The sheila troll the mervin. The sheila siss the gloriana. The sheila siss the mervin. The gloriana is emotional. The gloriana troll the sayer. The gloriana siss the mervin. The mervin is insistent. The mervin is surefooted. The mervin outride the gloriana. The mervin troll the sayer. If something siss the mervin then the mervin siss the sheila. If the mervin troll the sheila and the sheila is surefooted then the mervin outride the sayer. If something troll the sayer then the sayer is emotional. If something is emotional then it siss the sheila. If something outride the sheila and the sheila troll the sayer then it troll the gloriana. If something troll the gloriana then the gloriana siss the mervin. If the sheila outride the sayer and the sayer siss the gloriana then the sheila troll the sayer. If something siss the sheila then the sheila troll the sayer. The sheila does not need the sayer.", "logic": "\nEmotional(sayer)\nOutride(sayer, sheila)\nSiss(sayer, sheila)\nInsistent(sheila)\nOutride(sheila, gloriana)\nOutride(sheila, mervin)\nTroll(sheila, mervin)\nSiss(sheila, gloriana)\nSiss(sheila, mervin)\nEmotional(gloriana)\nTroll(gloriana, sayer)\nSiss(gloriana, mervin)\nInsistent(mervin)\nSurefooted(mervin)\nOutride(mervin, gloriana)\nTroll(mervin, sayer)\nforall x (Siss(x, mervin) -> Siss(mervin, sheila))\nTroll(mervin, sheila) and Surefooted(sheila) -> Outride(mervin, sayer)\nforall x (Troll(x, sayer) -> Emotional(sayer))\nforall x (Emotional(x) -> Siss(x, sheila))\nforall x (Outride(x, sheila) and Troll(sheila, sayer) -> Troll(x, gloriana))\nforall x (Troll(x, gloriana) -> Siss(gloriana, mervin))\nOutride(sheila, sayer) and Siss(sayer, gloriana) -> Troll(sheila, sayer)\nforall x (Siss(x, sheila) -> Troll(sheila, sayer))\n\nnot Troll(sheila, sayer)\n\nSiss(sayer, sheila) and forall x (Siss(x, sheila) -> Troll(sheila, sayer)) -> therefore Troll(sheila, sayer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The giles is cytolytic. The giles squeak the salvador. The giles secure the salvador. The salvador is endoergic. The salvador squeak the guillermo. The salvador squeak the ladonna. The salvador winterize the ladonna. The salvador secure the guillermo. The salvador secure the ladonna. The guillermo is cytolytic. The guillermo winterize the giles. The guillermo secure the ladonna. The ladonna is endoergic. The ladonna is disliked. The ladonna squeak the guillermo. The ladonna winterize the giles. If something secure the ladonna then the ladonna secure the salvador. If the ladonna winterize the salvador and the salvador is disliked then the ladonna squeak the giles. If something winterize the giles then the giles is cytolytic. If something is cytolytic then it secure the salvador. If something squeak the salvador and the salvador winterize the giles then it winterize the guillermo. If something winterize the guillermo then the guillermo secure the ladonna. If the salvador squeak the giles and the giles secure the guillermo then the salvador winterize the giles. If something secure the salvador then the salvador winterize the giles. The giles winterize the guillermo.", "logic": "\nCytolytic(giles)\nSqueak(giles, salvador)\nSecure(giles, salvador)\nEndoergic(salvador)\nSqueak(salvador, guillermo)\nSqueak(salvador, ladonna)\nWinterize(salvador, ladonna)\nSecure(salvador, guillermo)\nSecure(salvador, ladonna)\nCytolytic(guillermo)\nWinterize(guillermo, giles)\nSecure(guillermo, ladonna)\nEndoergic(ladonna)\nDisliked(ladonna)\nSqueak(ladonna, guillermo)\nWinterize(ladonna, giles)\nforall x (Secure(x, ladonna) -> Secure(ladonna, salvador))\nWinterize(ladonna, salvador) and Disliked(salvador) -> Squeak(ladonna, giles)\nforall x (Winterize(x, giles) -> Cytolytic(giles))\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Secure(x, salvador))\nforall x (Squeak(x, salvador) and Winterize(salvador, giles) -> Winterize(x, guillermo))\nforall x (Winterize(x, guillermo) -> Secure(guillermo, ladonna))\nSqueak(salvador, giles) and Secure(giles, guillermo) -> Winterize(salvador, giles)\nforall x (Secure(x, salvador) -> Winterize(salvador, giles))\n\nWinterize(giles, guillermo)\n\nSecure(giles, salvador) and forall x (Secure(x, salvador) -> Winterize(salvador, giles)) -> therefore Winterize(salvador, giles) Squeak(giles, salvador) and Winterize(salvador, giles) and forall x (Squeak(x, salvador) and Winterize(salvador, giles) -> Winterize(x, guillermo)) -> therefore Winterize(giles, guillermo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The marko is dual. The marko outgrow the latisha. The marko wade the latisha. The latisha is prosodic. The latisha outgrow the ariel. The latisha outgrow the candice. The latisha whelm the candice. The latisha wade the ariel. The latisha wade the candice. The ariel is dual. The ariel whelm the marko. The ariel wade the candice. The candice is prosodic. The candice is half. The candice outgrow the ariel. The candice whelm the marko. If something wade the candice then the candice wade the latisha. If the candice whelm the latisha and the latisha is half then the candice outgrow the marko. If something whelm the marko then the marko is dual. If something is dual then it wade the latisha. If something outgrow the latisha and the latisha whelm the marko then it whelm the ariel. If something whelm the ariel then the ariel wade the candice. If the latisha outgrow the marko and the marko wade the ariel then the latisha whelm the marko. If something wade the latisha then the latisha whelm the marko. The marko does not need the ariel.", "logic": "\nDual(marko)\nOutgrow(marko, latisha)\nWade(marko, latisha)\nProsodic(latisha)\nOutgrow(latisha, ariel)\nOutgrow(latisha, candice)\nWhelm(latisha, candice)\nWade(latisha, ariel)\nWade(latisha, candice)\nDual(ariel)\nWhelm(ariel, marko)\nWade(ariel, candice)\nProsodic(candice)\nHalf(candice)\nOutgrow(candice, ariel)\nWhelm(candice, marko)\nforall x (Wade(x, candice) -> Wade(candice, latisha))\nWhelm(candice, latisha) and Half(latisha) -> Outgrow(candice, marko)\nforall x (Whelm(x, marko) -> Dual(marko))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Wade(x, latisha))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, latisha) and Whelm(latisha, marko) -> Whelm(x, ariel))\nforall x (Whelm(x, ariel) -> Wade(ariel, candice))\nOutgrow(latisha, marko) and Wade(marko, ariel) -> Whelm(latisha, marko)\nforall x (Wade(x, latisha) -> Whelm(latisha, marko))\n\nnot Whelm(marko, ariel)\n\nWade(marko, latisha) and forall x (Wade(x, latisha) -> Whelm(latisha, marko)) -> therefore Whelm(latisha, marko) Outgrow(marko, latisha) and Whelm(latisha, marko) and forall x (Outgrow(x, latisha) and Whelm(latisha, marko) -> Whelm(x, ariel)) -> therefore Whelm(marko, ariel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The carin is disordered. The carin disconcert the torrey. The carin vesicate the torrey. The torrey is reasonable. The torrey disconcert the carmelita. The torrey disconcert the yehudi. The torrey enclose the yehudi. The torrey vesicate the carmelita. The torrey vesicate the yehudi. The carmelita is disordered. The carmelita enclose the carin. The carmelita vesicate the yehudi. The yehudi is reasonable. The yehudi is ilxxx. The yehudi disconcert the carmelita. The yehudi enclose the carin. If something vesicate the yehudi then the yehudi vesicate the torrey. If the yehudi enclose the torrey and the torrey is ilxxx then the yehudi disconcert the carin. If something enclose the carin then the carin is disordered. If something is disordered then it vesicate the torrey. If something disconcert the torrey and the torrey enclose the carin then it enclose the carmelita. If something enclose the carmelita then the carmelita vesicate the yehudi. If the torrey disconcert the carin and the carin vesicate the carmelita then the torrey enclose the carin. If something vesicate the torrey then the torrey enclose the carin. The torrey does not need the carmelita.", "logic": "\nDisordered(carin)\nDisconcert(carin, torrey)\nVesicate(carin, torrey)\nReasonable(torrey)\nDisconcert(torrey, carmelita)\nDisconcert(torrey, yehudi)\nEnclose(torrey, yehudi)\nVesicate(torrey, carmelita)\nVesicate(torrey, yehudi)\nDisordered(carmelita)\nEnclose(carmelita, carin)\nVesicate(carmelita, yehudi)\nReasonable(yehudi)\nIlxxx(yehudi)\nDisconcert(yehudi, carmelita)\nEnclose(yehudi, carin)\nforall x (Vesicate(x, yehudi) -> Vesicate(yehudi, torrey))\nEnclose(yehudi, torrey) and Ilxxx(torrey) -> Disconcert(yehudi, carin)\nforall x (Enclose(x, carin) -> Disordered(carin))\nforall x (Disordered(x) -> Vesicate(x, torrey))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, torrey) and Enclose(torrey, carin) -> Enclose(x, carmelita))\nforall x (Enclose(x, carmelita) -> Vesicate(carmelita, yehudi))\nDisconcert(torrey, carin) and Vesicate(carin, carmelita) -> Enclose(torrey, carin)\nforall x (Vesicate(x, torrey) -> Enclose(torrey, carin))\n\nnot Enclose(torrey, carmelita)\n\nforall x (Disconcert(x, torrey) and Enclose(torrey, carin) -> Enclose(x, carmelita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The shoshana is cognate. The shoshana straddle the katheryn. The shoshana coiffe the katheryn. The katheryn is anagogic. The katheryn straddle the denise. The katheryn straddle the taylor. The katheryn vacate the taylor. The katheryn coiffe the denise. The katheryn coiffe the taylor. The denise is cognate. The denise vacate the shoshana. The denise coiffe the taylor. The taylor is anagogic. The taylor is returnable. The taylor straddle the denise. The taylor vacate the shoshana. If something coiffe the taylor then the taylor coiffe the katheryn. If the taylor vacate the katheryn and the katheryn is returnable then the taylor straddle the shoshana. If something vacate the shoshana then the shoshana is cognate. If something is cognate then it coiffe the katheryn. If something straddle the katheryn and the katheryn vacate the shoshana then it vacate the denise. If something vacate the denise then the denise coiffe the taylor. If the katheryn straddle the shoshana and the shoshana coiffe the denise then the katheryn vacate the shoshana. If something coiffe the katheryn then the katheryn vacate the shoshana. The denise vacate the denise.", "logic": "\nCognate(shoshana)\nStraddle(shoshana, katheryn)\nCoiffe(shoshana, katheryn)\nAnagogic(katheryn)\nStraddle(katheryn, denise)\nStraddle(katheryn, taylor)\nVacate(katheryn, taylor)\nCoiffe(katheryn, denise)\nCoiffe(katheryn, taylor)\nCognate(denise)\nVacate(denise, shoshana)\nCoiffe(denise, taylor)\nAnagogic(taylor)\nReturnable(taylor)\nStraddle(taylor, denise)\nVacate(taylor, shoshana)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, taylor) -> Coiffe(taylor, katheryn))\nVacate(taylor, katheryn) and Returnable(katheryn) -> Straddle(taylor, shoshana)\nforall x (Vacate(x, shoshana) -> Cognate(shoshana))\nforall x (Cognate(x) -> Coiffe(x, katheryn))\nforall x (Straddle(x, katheryn) and Vacate(katheryn, shoshana) -> Vacate(x, denise))\nforall x (Vacate(x, denise) -> Coiffe(denise, taylor))\nStraddle(katheryn, shoshana) and Coiffe(shoshana, denise) -> Vacate(katheryn, shoshana)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, katheryn) -> Vacate(katheryn, shoshana))\n\nVacate(denise, denise)\n\nforall x (Straddle(x, katheryn) and Vacate(katheryn, shoshana) -> Vacate(x, denise)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The libbie is infamous. The libbie systemise the istvan. The libbie resect the istvan. The istvan is caller. The istvan systemise the bobina. The istvan systemise the jaleh. The istvan quarantine the jaleh. The istvan resect the bobina. The istvan resect the jaleh. The bobina is infamous. The bobina quarantine the libbie. The bobina resect the jaleh. The jaleh is caller. The jaleh is binominal. The jaleh systemise the bobina. The jaleh quarantine the libbie. If something resect the jaleh then the jaleh resect the istvan. If the jaleh quarantine the istvan and the istvan is binominal then the jaleh systemise the libbie. If something quarantine the libbie then the libbie is infamous. If something is infamous then it resect the istvan. If something systemise the istvan and the istvan quarantine the libbie then it quarantine the bobina. If something quarantine the bobina then the bobina resect the jaleh. If the istvan systemise the libbie and the libbie resect the bobina then the istvan quarantine the libbie. If something resect the istvan then the istvan quarantine the libbie. The jaleh does not like the libbie.", "logic": "\nInfamous(libbie)\nSystemise(libbie, istvan)\nResect(libbie, istvan)\nCaller(istvan)\nSystemise(istvan, bobina)\nSystemise(istvan, jaleh)\nQuarantine(istvan, jaleh)\nResect(istvan, bobina)\nResect(istvan, jaleh)\nInfamous(bobina)\nQuarantine(bobina, libbie)\nResect(bobina, jaleh)\nCaller(jaleh)\nBinominal(jaleh)\nSystemise(jaleh, bobina)\nQuarantine(jaleh, libbie)\nforall x (Resect(x, jaleh) -> Resect(jaleh, istvan))\nQuarantine(jaleh, istvan) and Binominal(istvan) -> Systemise(jaleh, libbie)\nforall x (Quarantine(x, libbie) -> Infamous(libbie))\nforall x (Infamous(x) -> Resect(x, istvan))\nforall x (Systemise(x, istvan) and Quarantine(istvan, libbie) -> Quarantine(x, bobina))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, bobina) -> Resect(bobina, jaleh))\nSystemise(istvan, libbie) and Resect(libbie, bobina) -> Quarantine(istvan, libbie)\nforall x (Resect(x, istvan) -> Quarantine(istvan, libbie))\n\nnot Systemise(jaleh, libbie)\n\nQuarantine(jaleh, istvan) and Binominal(istvan) -> Systemise(jaleh, libbie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The ginni is bosomy. The ginni lash the petr. The ginni bunch the petr. The petr is flowerless. The petr lash the venita. The petr lash the marlo. The petr pressurise the marlo. The petr bunch the venita. The petr bunch the marlo. The venita is bosomy. The venita pressurise the ginni. The venita bunch the marlo. The marlo is flowerless. The marlo is cupulate. The marlo lash the venita. The marlo pressurise the ginni. If something bunch the marlo then the marlo bunch the petr. If the marlo pressurise the petr and the petr is cupulate then the marlo lash the ginni. If something pressurise the ginni then the ginni is bosomy. If something is bosomy then it bunch the petr. If something lash the petr and the petr pressurise the ginni then it pressurise the venita. If something pressurise the venita then the venita bunch the marlo. If the petr lash the ginni and the ginni bunch the venita then the petr pressurise the ginni. If something bunch the petr then the petr pressurise the ginni. The venita is flowerless.", "logic": "\nBosomy(ginni)\nLash(ginni, petr)\nBunch(ginni, petr)\nFlowerless(petr)\nLash(petr, venita)\nLash(petr, marlo)\nPressurise(petr, marlo)\nBunch(petr, venita)\nBunch(petr, marlo)\nBosomy(venita)\nPressurise(venita, ginni)\nBunch(venita, marlo)\nFlowerless(marlo)\nCupulate(marlo)\nLash(marlo, venita)\nPressurise(marlo, ginni)\nforall x (Bunch(x, marlo) -> Bunch(marlo, petr))\nPressurise(marlo, petr) and Cupulate(petr) -> Lash(marlo, ginni)\nforall x (Pressurise(x, ginni) -> Bosomy(ginni))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) -> Bunch(x, petr))\nforall x (Lash(x, petr) and Pressurise(petr, ginni) -> Pressurise(x, venita))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, venita) -> Bunch(venita, marlo))\nLash(petr, ginni) and Bunch(ginni, venita) -> Pressurise(petr, ginni)\nforall x (Bunch(x, petr) -> Pressurise(petr, ginni))\n\nFlowerless(venita)\n\nFlowerless(venita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The maddi is suctorial. The maddi miniate the madelyn. The maddi rest the madelyn. The madelyn is subatomic. The madelyn miniate the beaufort. The madelyn miniate the clarence. The madelyn sunburn the clarence. The madelyn rest the beaufort. The madelyn rest the clarence. The beaufort is suctorial. The beaufort sunburn the maddi. The beaufort rest the clarence. The clarence is subatomic. The clarence is pulmonary. The clarence miniate the beaufort. The clarence sunburn the maddi. If something rest the clarence then the clarence rest the madelyn. If the clarence sunburn the madelyn and the madelyn is pulmonary then the clarence miniate the maddi. If something sunburn the maddi then the maddi is suctorial. If something is suctorial then it rest the madelyn. If something miniate the madelyn and the madelyn sunburn the maddi then it sunburn the beaufort. If something sunburn the beaufort then the beaufort rest the clarence. If the madelyn miniate the maddi and the maddi rest the beaufort then the madelyn sunburn the maddi. If something rest the madelyn then the madelyn sunburn the maddi. The maddi is not big.", "logic": "\nSuctorial(maddi)\nMiniate(maddi, madelyn)\nRest(maddi, madelyn)\nSubatomic(madelyn)\nMiniate(madelyn, beaufort)\nMiniate(madelyn, clarence)\nSunburn(madelyn, clarence)\nRest(madelyn, beaufort)\nRest(madelyn, clarence)\nSuctorial(beaufort)\nSunburn(beaufort, maddi)\nRest(beaufort, clarence)\nSubatomic(clarence)\nPulmonary(clarence)\nMiniate(clarence, beaufort)\nSunburn(clarence, maddi)\nforall x (Rest(x, clarence) -> Rest(clarence, madelyn))\nSunburn(clarence, madelyn) and Pulmonary(madelyn) -> Miniate(clarence, maddi)\nforall x (Sunburn(x, maddi) -> Suctorial(maddi))\nforall x (Suctorial(x) -> Rest(x, madelyn))\nforall x (Miniate(x, madelyn) and Sunburn(madelyn, maddi) -> Sunburn(x, beaufort))\nforall x (Sunburn(x, beaufort) -> Rest(beaufort, clarence))\nMiniate(madelyn, maddi) and Rest(maddi, beaufort) -> Sunburn(madelyn, maddi)\nforall x (Rest(x, madelyn) -> Sunburn(madelyn, maddi))\n\nnot Big(maddi)\n\nnot Big(maddi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "The madelon is unsavoury. The madelon hymn the mariya. The madelon taper the mariya. The mariya is irascible. The mariya hymn the andreas. The mariya hymn the dalia. The mariya curtain the dalia. The mariya taper the andreas. The mariya taper the dalia. The andreas is unsavoury. The andreas curtain the madelon. The andreas taper the dalia. The dalia is irascible. The dalia is cursed. The dalia hymn the andreas. The dalia curtain the madelon. If something taper the dalia then the dalia taper the mariya. If the dalia curtain the mariya and the mariya is cursed then the dalia hymn the madelon. If something curtain the madelon then the madelon is unsavoury. If something is unsavoury then it taper the mariya. If something hymn the mariya and the mariya curtain the madelon then it curtain the andreas. If something curtain the andreas then the andreas taper the dalia. If the mariya hymn the madelon and the madelon taper the andreas then the mariya curtain the madelon. If something taper the mariya then the mariya curtain the madelon. The mariya taper the madelon.", "logic": "\nUnsavoury(madelon)\nHymn(madelon, mariya)\nTaper(madelon, mariya)\nIrascible(mariya)\nHymn(mariya, andreas)\nHymn(mariya, dalia)\nCurtain(mariya, dalia)\nTaper(mariya, andreas)\nTaper(mariya, dalia)\nUnsavoury(andreas)\nCurtain(andreas, madelon)\nTaper(andreas, dalia)\nIrascible(dalia)\nCursed(dalia)\nHymn(dalia, andreas)\nCurtain(dalia, madelon)\nforall x (Taper(x, dalia) -> Taper(dalia, mariya))\nCurtain(dalia, mariya) and Cursed(mariya) -> Hymn(dalia, madelon)\nforall x (Curtain(x, madelon) -> Unsavoury(madelon))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) -> Taper(x, mariya))\nforall x (Hymn(x, mariya) and Curtain(mariya, madelon) -> Curtain(x, andreas))\nforall x (Curtain(x, andreas) -> Taper(andreas, dalia))\nHymn(mariya, madelon) and Taper(madelon, andreas) -> Curtain(mariya, madelon)\nforall x (Taper(x, mariya) -> Curtain(mariya, madelon))\n\nTaper(mariya, madelon)\n\nTaper(mariya, madelon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1642"} {"premises": "Mari is untired. Kalli is leeward. All leeward things are stemmatic. All stemmatic things are necklike. Quiet, necklike things are unconsumed. Mari is untired.", "logic": "\nUntired(mari)\nLeeward(kalli)\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Stemmatic(x))\nforall x (Stemmatic(x) -> Necklike(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) and Necklike(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\n\nUntired(mari)\n\ntherefore Untired(mari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Filide is featured. Binky is overawed. All overawed things are pestilent. All pestilent things are basilar. Quiet, basilar things are carthusian. Filide is not featured.", "logic": "\nFeatured(filide)\nOverawed(binky)\nforall x (Overawed(x) -> Pestilent(x))\nforall x (Pestilent(x) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Defendable(x) and Basilar(x) -> Carthusian(x))\n\nnot Featured(filide)\n\ntherefore Featured(filide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Nadia is turbid. Thedric is warning. All warning things are dendroid. All dendroid things are neuronal. Quiet, neuronal things are grating. Thedric is dendroid.", "logic": "\nTurbid(nadia)\nWarning(thedric)\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Dendroid(x))\nforall x (Dendroid(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) and Neuronal(x) -> Grating(x))\n\nDendroid(thedric)\n\nWarning(thedric) and forall x (Warning(x) -> Dendroid(x)) -> therefore Dendroid(thedric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Stefania is opening. Pail is rawboned. All rawboned things are human. All human things are algebraic. Quiet, algebraic things are tolerable. Pail is not human.", "logic": "\nOpening(stefania)\nRawboned(pail)\nforall x (Rawboned(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and Algebraic(x) -> Tolerable(x))\n\nnot Human(pail)\n\nRawboned(pail) and forall x (Rawboned(x) -> Human(x)) -> therefore Human(pail)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Mallory is uncleared. Kincaid is defiled. All defiled things are execrable. All execrable things are subliminal. Quiet, subliminal things are shelfy. Kincaid is subliminal.", "logic": "\nUncleared(mallory)\nDefiled(kincaid)\nforall x (Defiled(x) -> Execrable(x))\nforall x (Execrable(x) -> Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Acicular(x) and Subliminal(x) -> Shelfy(x))\n\nSubliminal(kincaid)\n\nDefiled(kincaid) and forall x (Defiled(x) -> Execrable(x)) -> therefore Execrable(kincaid) Execrable(kincaid) and forall x (Execrable(x) -> Subliminal(x)) -> therefore Subliminal(kincaid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Bree is tensed. Jerrylee is sublunary. All sublunary things are anguine. All anguine things are nonplused. Quiet, nonplused things are neuter. Jerrylee is not nonplused.", "logic": "\nTensed(bree)\nSublunary(jerrylee)\nforall x (Sublunary(x) -> Anguine(x))\nforall x (Anguine(x) -> Nonplused(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) and Nonplused(x) -> Neuter(x))\n\nnot Nonplused(jerrylee)\n\nSublunary(jerrylee) and forall x (Sublunary(x) -> Anguine(x)) -> therefore Anguine(jerrylee) Anguine(jerrylee) and forall x (Anguine(x) -> Nonplused(x)) -> therefore Nonplused(jerrylee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Suzanne is daunted. Eduardo is greenish. All greenish things are utilizable. All utilizable things are iffy. Quiet, iffy things are outgoing. Suzanne is not utilizable.", "logic": "\nDaunted(suzanne)\nGreenish(eduardo)\nforall x (Greenish(x) -> Utilizable(x))\nforall x (Utilizable(x) -> Iffy(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Iffy(x) -> Outgoing(x))\n\nnot Utilizable(suzanne)\n\nforall x (Greenish(x) -> Utilizable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Cilka is unimpeded. Cyb is chilly. All chilly things are calando. All calando things are pilary. Quiet, pilary things are anarchical. Cilka is anarchical.", "logic": "\nUnimpeded(cilka)\nChilly(cyb)\nforall x (Chilly(x) -> Calando(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Pilary(x))\nforall x (Unanswered(x) and Pilary(x) -> Anarchical(x))\n\nAnarchical(cilka)\n\nforall x (Unanswered(x) and Pilary(x) -> Anarchical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Fidel is bungling. Darsie is resinlike. All resinlike things are nonmotile. All nonmotile things are tart. Quiet, tart things are extensive. Fidel is not tart.", "logic": "\nBungling(fidel)\nResinlike(darsie)\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Nonmotile(x))\nforall x (Nonmotile(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) and Tart(x) -> Extensive(x))\n\nnot Tart(fidel)\n\nforall x (Nonmotile(x) -> Tart(x)) <- forall x (Resinlike(x) -> Nonmotile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Quigly is unplanned. Evie is saprozoic. All saprozoic things are coreferent. All coreferent things are lackluster. Quiet, lackluster things are satellite. Evie is round.", "logic": "\nUnplanned(quigly)\nSaprozoic(evie)\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) -> Coreferent(x))\nforall x (Coreferent(x) -> Lackluster(x))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and Lackluster(x) -> Satellite(x))\n\nRound(evie)\n\nRound(evie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Lynda is sibylline. Josefa is axial. All axial things are perennial. All perennial things are moldy. Quiet, moldy things are acicular. Josefa is not sibylline.", "logic": "\nSibylline(lynda)\nAxial(josefa)\nforall x (Axial(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Perennial(x) -> Moldy(x))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) and Moldy(x) -> Acicular(x))\n\nnot Sibylline(josefa)\n\nnot Sibylline(josefa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Annalyse is tentacled. Tammy is foliaged. All foliaged things are lugubrious. All lugubrious things are watchful. Quiet, watchful things are unequal. Annalyse is round.", "logic": "\nTentacled(annalyse)\nFoliaged(tammy)\nforall x (Foliaged(x) -> Lugubrious(x))\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> Watchful(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) and Watchful(x) -> Unequal(x))\n\nRound(annalyse)\n\nRound(annalyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1397"} {"premises": "Violante is noble. Violante is following. Violante is not bubonic. Violante is agonistic. Averil is not auriculate. Averil is noble. Averil is following. Averil is confining. Averil is lucent. Averil is agonistic. If someone is agonistic then they are confining. If someone is confining then they are lucent. If someone is auriculate and not confining then they are not noble. Averil is noble.", "logic": "\nNoble(violante)\nFollowing(violante)\nnot Bubonic(violante)\nAgonistic(violante)\nnot Auriculate(averil)\nNoble(averil)\nFollowing(averil)\nConfining(averil)\nLucent(averil)\nAgonistic(averil)\nforall x (Agonistic(x) -> Confining(x))\nforall x (Confining(x) -> Lucent(x))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) and not Confining(x) -> not Noble(x))\n\nNoble(averil)\n\ntherefore Noble(averil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "Wain is wonted. Wain is foliaged. Wain is not equatorial. Wain is nurturant. Karin is not grabby. Karin is wonted. Karin is foliaged. Karin is coherent. Karin is branchial. Karin is nurturant. If someone is nurturant then they are coherent. If someone is coherent then they are branchial. If someone is grabby and not coherent then they are not wonted. Karin is not coherent.", "logic": "\nWonted(wain)\nFoliaged(wain)\nnot Equatorial(wain)\nNurturant(wain)\nnot Grabby(karin)\nWonted(karin)\nFoliaged(karin)\nCoherent(karin)\nBranchial(karin)\nNurturant(karin)\nforall x (Nurturant(x) -> Coherent(x))\nforall x (Coherent(x) -> Branchial(x))\nforall x (Grabby(x) and not Coherent(x) -> not Wonted(x))\n\nnot Coherent(karin)\n\ntherefore Coherent(karin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "Brena is sprawly. Brena is recluse. Brena is not ladylike. Brena is tragicomic. Moyra is not chivalrous. Moyra is sprawly. Moyra is recluse. Moyra is rummy. Moyra is gilt. Moyra is tragicomic. If someone is tragicomic then they are rummy. If someone is rummy then they are gilt. If someone is chivalrous and not rummy then they are not sprawly. Brena is rummy.", "logic": "\nSprawly(brena)\nRecluse(brena)\nnot Ladylike(brena)\nTragicomic(brena)\nnot Chivalrous(moyra)\nSprawly(moyra)\nRecluse(moyra)\nRummy(moyra)\nGilt(moyra)\nTragicomic(moyra)\nforall x (Tragicomic(x) -> Rummy(x))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Gilt(x))\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) and not Rummy(x) -> not Sprawly(x))\n\nRummy(brena)\n\nTragicomic(brena) and forall x (Tragicomic(x) -> Rummy(x)) -> therefore Rummy(brena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "Theodora is botswanan. Theodora is unassuming. Theodora is not inspired. Theodora is cytolytic. Andie is not rotatable. Andie is botswanan. Andie is unassuming. Andie is anopheline. Andie is qualified. Andie is cytolytic. If someone is cytolytic then they are anopheline. If someone is anopheline then they are qualified. If someone is rotatable and not anopheline then they are not botswanan. Theodora is not anopheline.", "logic": "\nBotswanan(theodora)\nUnassuming(theodora)\nnot Inspired(theodora)\nCytolytic(theodora)\nnot Rotatable(andie)\nBotswanan(andie)\nUnassuming(andie)\nAnopheline(andie)\nQualified(andie)\nCytolytic(andie)\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Anopheline(x))\nforall x (Anopheline(x) -> Qualified(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and not Anopheline(x) -> not Botswanan(x))\n\nnot Anopheline(theodora)\n\nCytolytic(theodora) and forall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Anopheline(x)) -> therefore Anopheline(theodora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "Marquita is daisylike. Marquita is wise. Marquita is not crossed. Marquita is polite. Alanah is not gammy. Alanah is daisylike. Alanah is wise. Alanah is apical. Alanah is miffed. Alanah is polite. If someone is polite then they are apical. If someone is apical then they are miffed. If someone is gammy and not apical then they are not daisylike. Marquita is miffed.", "logic": "\nDaisylike(marquita)\nWise(marquita)\nnot Crossed(marquita)\nPolite(marquita)\nnot Gammy(alanah)\nDaisylike(alanah)\nWise(alanah)\nApical(alanah)\nMiffed(alanah)\nPolite(alanah)\nforall x (Polite(x) -> Apical(x))\nforall x (Apical(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Gammy(x) and not Apical(x) -> not Daisylike(x))\n\nMiffed(marquita)\n\nPolite(marquita) and forall x (Polite(x) -> Apical(x)) -> therefore Apical(marquita) Apical(marquita) and forall x (Apical(x) -> Miffed(x)) -> therefore Miffed(marquita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "Zia is bosomy. Zia is locomotor. Zia is not laurelled. Zia is preteen. Morganica is not indistinct. Morganica is bosomy. Morganica is locomotor. Morganica is ignoble. Morganica is influent. Morganica is preteen. If someone is preteen then they are ignoble. If someone is ignoble then they are influent. If someone is indistinct and not ignoble then they are not bosomy. Zia is not influent.", "logic": "\nBosomy(zia)\nLocomotor(zia)\nnot Laurelled(zia)\nPreteen(zia)\nnot Indistinct(morganica)\nBosomy(morganica)\nLocomotor(morganica)\nIgnoble(morganica)\nInfluent(morganica)\nPreteen(morganica)\nforall x (Preteen(x) -> Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Influent(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) and not Ignoble(x) -> not Bosomy(x))\n\nnot Influent(zia)\n\nPreteen(zia) and forall x (Preteen(x) -> Ignoble(x)) -> therefore Ignoble(zia) Ignoble(zia) and forall x (Ignoble(x) -> Influent(x)) -> therefore Influent(zia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "Annabela is optimistic. Annabela is envious. Annabela is not unalike. Annabela is utilizable. Lonni is not nerveless. Lonni is optimistic. Lonni is envious. Lonni is ambitious. Lonni is castled. Lonni is utilizable. If someone is utilizable then they are ambitious. If someone is ambitious then they are castled. If someone is nerveless and not ambitious then they are not optimistic. Lonni is not unalike.", "logic": "\nOptimistic(annabela)\nEnvious(annabela)\nnot Unalike(annabela)\nUtilizable(annabela)\nnot Nerveless(lonni)\nOptimistic(lonni)\nEnvious(lonni)\nAmbitious(lonni)\nCastled(lonni)\nUtilizable(lonni)\nforall x (Utilizable(x) -> Ambitious(x))\nforall x (Ambitious(x) -> Castled(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and not Ambitious(x) -> not Optimistic(x))\n\nnot Unalike(lonni)\n\nnot Unalike(lonni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "Archie is enviable. Archie is centralist. Archie is not unwrinkled. Archie is uptight. Natalee is not unbeholden. Natalee is enviable. Natalee is centralist. Natalee is randomised. Natalee is grown. Natalee is uptight. If someone is uptight then they are randomised. If someone is randomised then they are grown. If someone is unbeholden and not randomised then they are not enviable. Archie is unbeholden.", "logic": "\nEnviable(archie)\nCentralist(archie)\nnot Unwrinkled(archie)\nUptight(archie)\nnot Unbeholden(natalee)\nEnviable(natalee)\nCentralist(natalee)\nRandomised(natalee)\nGrown(natalee)\nUptight(natalee)\nforall x (Uptight(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) and not Randomised(x) -> not Enviable(x))\n\nUnbeholden(archie)\n\nUnbeholden(archie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-363"} {"premises": "The laurance beat the gen. The laurance is armorial. The laurance is ungentle. The laurance novate the gen. The laurance spondaise the gen. The gen beat the laurance. The gen is not armorial. The gen is ungentle. The gen is not fervent. The gen is not togged. The gen novate the laurance. The gen spondaise the laurance. If someone novate the laurance and the laurance is armorial then they are sewed. If someone is fervent and they visit the laurance then the laurance does not visit the gen. Blue, fervent people are not togged. If someone spondaise the gen and the gen spondaise the laurance then the laurance is fervent. If the laurance spondaise the gen and the gen does not visit the laurance then the laurance is fervent. If someone novate the gen and the gen does not like the laurance then the laurance beat the gen. The gen spondaise the laurance.", "logic": "\nBeat(laurance, gen)\nArmorial(laurance)\nUngentle(laurance)\nNovate(laurance, gen)\nSpondaise(laurance, gen)\nBeat(gen, laurance)\nnot Armorial(gen)\nUngentle(gen)\nnot Fervent(gen)\nnot Togged(gen)\nNovate(gen, laurance)\nSpondaise(gen, laurance)\nforall x (Novate(x, laurance) and Armorial(laurance) -> Sewed(x))\nforall x (Fervent(x) and Spondaise(x, laurance) -> not Spondaise(laurance, gen))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) and Fervent(x) -> not Togged(x))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, gen) and Spondaise(gen, laurance) -> Fervent(laurance))\nSpondaise(laurance, gen) and not Spondaise(gen, laurance) -> Fervent(laurance)\nforall x (Novate(x, gen) and not Novate(gen, laurance) -> Beat(laurance, gen))\n\nSpondaise(gen, laurance)\n\ntherefore Spondaise(gen, laurance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The delores treat the doll. The delores is protozoal. The delores is zygodactyl. The delores wrap the doll. The delores aline the doll. The doll treat the delores. The doll is not protozoal. The doll is zygodactyl. The doll is not notched. The doll is not homocercal. The doll wrap the delores. The doll aline the delores. If someone wrap the delores and the delores is protozoal then they are romani. If someone is notched and they visit the delores then the delores does not visit the doll. Blue, notched people are not homocercal. If someone aline the doll and the doll aline the delores then the delores is notched. If the delores aline the doll and the doll does not visit the delores then the delores is notched. If someone wrap the doll and the doll does not like the delores then the delores treat the doll. The doll is not zygodactyl.", "logic": "\nTreat(delores, doll)\nProtozoal(delores)\nZygodactyl(delores)\nWrap(delores, doll)\nAline(delores, doll)\nTreat(doll, delores)\nnot Protozoal(doll)\nZygodactyl(doll)\nnot Notched(doll)\nnot Homocercal(doll)\nWrap(doll, delores)\nAline(doll, delores)\nforall x (Wrap(x, delores) and Protozoal(delores) -> Romani(x))\nforall x (Notched(x) and Aline(x, delores) -> not Aline(delores, doll))\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) and Notched(x) -> not Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Aline(x, doll) and Aline(doll, delores) -> Notched(delores))\nAline(delores, doll) and not Aline(doll, delores) -> Notched(delores)\nforall x (Wrap(x, doll) and not Wrap(doll, delores) -> Treat(delores, doll))\n\nnot Zygodactyl(doll)\n\ntherefore Zygodactyl(doll)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The phyllida twin the kristin. The phyllida is biased. The phyllida is asserted. The phyllida mapquest the kristin. The phyllida exposit the kristin. The kristin twin the phyllida. The kristin is not biased. The kristin is asserted. The kristin is not dendritic. The kristin is not bridgeable. The kristin mapquest the phyllida. The kristin exposit the phyllida. If someone mapquest the phyllida and the phyllida is biased then they are tinny. If someone is dendritic and they visit the phyllida then the phyllida does not visit the kristin. Blue, dendritic people are not bridgeable. If someone exposit the kristin and the kristin exposit the phyllida then the phyllida is dendritic. If the phyllida exposit the kristin and the kristin does not visit the phyllida then the phyllida is dendritic. If someone mapquest the kristin and the kristin does not like the phyllida then the phyllida twin the kristin. The phyllida is dendritic.", "logic": "\nTwin(phyllida, kristin)\nBiased(phyllida)\nAsserted(phyllida)\nMapquest(phyllida, kristin)\nExposit(phyllida, kristin)\nTwin(kristin, phyllida)\nnot Biased(kristin)\nAsserted(kristin)\nnot Dendritic(kristin)\nnot Bridgeable(kristin)\nMapquest(kristin, phyllida)\nExposit(kristin, phyllida)\nforall x (Mapquest(x, phyllida) and Biased(phyllida) -> Tinny(x))\nforall x (Dendritic(x) and Exposit(x, phyllida) -> not Exposit(phyllida, kristin))\nforall x (Asserted(x) and Dendritic(x) -> not Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Exposit(x, kristin) and Exposit(kristin, phyllida) -> Dendritic(phyllida))\nExposit(phyllida, kristin) and not Exposit(kristin, phyllida) -> Dendritic(phyllida)\nforall x (Mapquest(x, kristin) and not Mapquest(kristin, phyllida) -> Twin(phyllida, kristin))\n\nDendritic(phyllida)\n\nExposit(phyllida, kristin) and Exposit(kristin, phyllida) and forall x (Exposit(x, kristin) and Exposit(kristin, phyllida) -> Dendritic(phyllida)) -> therefore Dendritic(phyllida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The lazarus apprize the audrye. The lazarus is anglican. The lazarus is stacked. The lazarus enervate the audrye. The lazarus copulate the audrye. The audrye apprize the lazarus. The audrye is not anglican. The audrye is stacked. The audrye is not adoptive. The audrye is not eyeless. The audrye enervate the lazarus. The audrye copulate the lazarus. If someone enervate the lazarus and the lazarus is anglican then they are gnostic. If someone is adoptive and they visit the lazarus then the lazarus does not visit the audrye. Blue, adoptive people are not eyeless. If someone copulate the audrye and the audrye copulate the lazarus then the lazarus is adoptive. If the lazarus copulate the audrye and the audrye does not visit the lazarus then the lazarus is adoptive. If someone enervate the audrye and the audrye does not like the lazarus then the lazarus apprize the audrye. The lazarus is not adoptive.", "logic": "\nApprize(lazarus, audrye)\nAnglican(lazarus)\nStacked(lazarus)\nEnervate(lazarus, audrye)\nCopulate(lazarus, audrye)\nApprize(audrye, lazarus)\nnot Anglican(audrye)\nStacked(audrye)\nnot Adoptive(audrye)\nnot Eyeless(audrye)\nEnervate(audrye, lazarus)\nCopulate(audrye, lazarus)\nforall x (Enervate(x, lazarus) and Anglican(lazarus) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) and Copulate(x, lazarus) -> not Copulate(lazarus, audrye))\nforall x (Stacked(x) and Adoptive(x) -> not Eyeless(x))\nforall x (Copulate(x, audrye) and Copulate(audrye, lazarus) -> Adoptive(lazarus))\nCopulate(lazarus, audrye) and not Copulate(audrye, lazarus) -> Adoptive(lazarus)\nforall x (Enervate(x, audrye) and not Enervate(audrye, lazarus) -> Apprize(lazarus, audrye))\n\nnot Adoptive(lazarus)\n\nCopulate(lazarus, audrye) and Copulate(audrye, lazarus) and forall x (Copulate(x, audrye) and Copulate(audrye, lazarus) -> Adoptive(lazarus)) -> therefore Adoptive(lazarus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The danice furlough the yule. The danice is acuminate. The danice is unwounded. The danice resole the yule. The danice resell the yule. The yule furlough the danice. The yule is not acuminate. The yule is unwounded. The yule is not aqueous. The yule is not astringent. The yule resole the danice. The yule resell the danice. If someone resole the danice and the danice is acuminate then they are faithless. If someone is aqueous and they visit the danice then the danice does not visit the yule. Blue, aqueous people are not astringent. If someone resell the yule and the yule resell the danice then the danice is aqueous. If the danice resell the yule and the yule does not visit the danice then the danice is aqueous. If someone resole the yule and the yule does not like the danice then the danice furlough the yule. The danice is not astringent.", "logic": "\nFurlough(danice, yule)\nAcuminate(danice)\nUnwounded(danice)\nResole(danice, yule)\nResell(danice, yule)\nFurlough(yule, danice)\nnot Acuminate(yule)\nUnwounded(yule)\nnot Aqueous(yule)\nnot Astringent(yule)\nResole(yule, danice)\nResell(yule, danice)\nforall x (Resole(x, danice) and Acuminate(danice) -> Faithless(x))\nforall x (Aqueous(x) and Resell(x, danice) -> not Resell(danice, yule))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) and Aqueous(x) -> not Astringent(x))\nforall x (Resell(x, yule) and Resell(yule, danice) -> Aqueous(danice))\nResell(danice, yule) and not Resell(yule, danice) -> Aqueous(danice)\nforall x (Resole(x, yule) and not Resole(yule, danice) -> Furlough(danice, yule))\n\nnot Astringent(danice)\n\nResell(danice, yule) and Resell(yule, danice) and forall x (Resell(x, yule) and Resell(yule, danice) -> Aqueous(danice)) -> therefore Aqueous(danice) Unwounded(danice) and Aqueous(danice) and forall x (Unwounded(x) and Aqueous(x) -> not Astringent(x)) -> therefore not Astringent(danice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The donal reflate the sidney. The donal is rumanian. The donal is indecisive. The donal apologise the sidney. The donal stump the sidney. The sidney reflate the donal. The sidney is not rumanian. The sidney is indecisive. The sidney is not traceable. The sidney is not sliding. The sidney apologise the donal. The sidney stump the donal. If someone apologise the donal and the donal is rumanian then they are lobated. If someone is traceable and they visit the donal then the donal does not visit the sidney. Blue, traceable people are not sliding. If someone stump the sidney and the sidney stump the donal then the donal is traceable. If the donal stump the sidney and the sidney does not visit the donal then the donal is traceable. If someone apologise the sidney and the sidney does not like the donal then the donal reflate the sidney. The donal is sliding.", "logic": "\nReflate(donal, sidney)\nRumanian(donal)\nIndecisive(donal)\nApologise(donal, sidney)\nStump(donal, sidney)\nReflate(sidney, donal)\nnot Rumanian(sidney)\nIndecisive(sidney)\nnot Traceable(sidney)\nnot Sliding(sidney)\nApologise(sidney, donal)\nStump(sidney, donal)\nforall x (Apologise(x, donal) and Rumanian(donal) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Traceable(x) and Stump(x, donal) -> not Stump(donal, sidney))\nforall x (Indecisive(x) and Traceable(x) -> not Sliding(x))\nforall x (Stump(x, sidney) and Stump(sidney, donal) -> Traceable(donal))\nStump(donal, sidney) and not Stump(sidney, donal) -> Traceable(donal)\nforall x (Apologise(x, sidney) and not Apologise(sidney, donal) -> Reflate(donal, sidney))\n\nSliding(donal)\n\nStump(donal, sidney) and Stump(sidney, donal) and forall x (Stump(x, sidney) and Stump(sidney, donal) -> Traceable(donal)) -> therefore Traceable(donal) Indecisive(donal) and Traceable(donal) and forall x (Indecisive(x) and Traceable(x) -> not Sliding(x)) -> therefore not Sliding(donal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The harlin overwinter the curtice. The harlin is minuscule. The harlin is assonant. The harlin domineer the curtice. The harlin chew the curtice. The curtice overwinter the harlin. The curtice is not minuscule. The curtice is assonant. The curtice is not stochastic. The curtice is not epenthetic. The curtice domineer the harlin. The curtice chew the harlin. If someone domineer the harlin and the harlin is minuscule then they are quadruple. If someone is stochastic and they visit the harlin then the harlin does not visit the curtice. Blue, stochastic people are not epenthetic. If someone chew the curtice and the curtice chew the harlin then the harlin is stochastic. If the harlin chew the curtice and the curtice does not visit the harlin then the harlin is stochastic. If someone domineer the curtice and the curtice does not like the harlin then the harlin overwinter the curtice. The harlin is not quadruple.", "logic": "\nOverwinter(harlin, curtice)\nMinuscule(harlin)\nAssonant(harlin)\nDomineer(harlin, curtice)\nChew(harlin, curtice)\nOverwinter(curtice, harlin)\nnot Minuscule(curtice)\nAssonant(curtice)\nnot Stochastic(curtice)\nnot Epenthetic(curtice)\nDomineer(curtice, harlin)\nChew(curtice, harlin)\nforall x (Domineer(x, harlin) and Minuscule(harlin) -> Quadruple(x))\nforall x (Stochastic(x) and Chew(x, harlin) -> not Chew(harlin, curtice))\nforall x (Assonant(x) and Stochastic(x) -> not Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Chew(x, curtice) and Chew(curtice, harlin) -> Stochastic(harlin))\nChew(harlin, curtice) and not Chew(curtice, harlin) -> Stochastic(harlin)\nforall x (Domineer(x, curtice) and not Domineer(curtice, harlin) -> Overwinter(harlin, curtice))\n\nnot Quadruple(harlin)\n\nforall x (Domineer(x, harlin) and Minuscule(harlin) -> Quadruple(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The ashlee mock the renaldo. The ashlee is sewed. The ashlee is riblike. The ashlee blood the renaldo. The ashlee visit the renaldo. The renaldo mock the ashlee. The renaldo is not sewed. The renaldo is riblike. The renaldo is not aslant. The renaldo is not subliminal. The renaldo blood the ashlee. The renaldo visit the ashlee. If someone blood the ashlee and the ashlee is sewed then they are workable. If someone is aslant and they visit the ashlee then the ashlee does not visit the renaldo. Blue, aslant people are not subliminal. If someone visit the renaldo and the renaldo visit the ashlee then the ashlee is aslant. If the ashlee visit the renaldo and the renaldo does not visit the ashlee then the ashlee is aslant. If someone blood the renaldo and the renaldo does not like the ashlee then the ashlee mock the renaldo. The renaldo mock the renaldo.", "logic": "\nMock(ashlee, renaldo)\nSewed(ashlee)\nRiblike(ashlee)\nBlood(ashlee, renaldo)\nVisit(ashlee, renaldo)\nMock(renaldo, ashlee)\nnot Sewed(renaldo)\nRiblike(renaldo)\nnot Aslant(renaldo)\nnot Subliminal(renaldo)\nBlood(renaldo, ashlee)\nVisit(renaldo, ashlee)\nforall x (Blood(x, ashlee) and Sewed(ashlee) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Aslant(x) and Visit(x, ashlee) -> not Visit(ashlee, renaldo))\nforall x (Riblike(x) and Aslant(x) -> not Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Visit(x, renaldo) and Visit(renaldo, ashlee) -> Aslant(ashlee))\nVisit(ashlee, renaldo) and not Visit(renaldo, ashlee) -> Aslant(ashlee)\nforall x (Blood(x, renaldo) and not Blood(renaldo, ashlee) -> Mock(ashlee, renaldo))\n\nMock(renaldo, renaldo)\n\nMock(renaldo, renaldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The silvie intertwine the aurel. The silvie is exemplary. The silvie is seagirt. The silvie enrage the aurel. The silvie slumber the aurel. The aurel intertwine the silvie. The aurel is not exemplary. The aurel is seagirt. The aurel is not carbonic. The aurel is not shelfy. The aurel enrage the silvie. The aurel slumber the silvie. If someone enrage the silvie and the silvie is exemplary then they are apropos. If someone is carbonic and they visit the silvie then the silvie does not visit the aurel. Blue, carbonic people are not shelfy. If someone slumber the aurel and the aurel slumber the silvie then the silvie is carbonic. If the silvie slumber the aurel and the aurel does not visit the silvie then the silvie is carbonic. If someone enrage the aurel and the aurel does not like the silvie then the silvie intertwine the aurel. The aurel does not visit the aurel.", "logic": "\nIntertwine(silvie, aurel)\nExemplary(silvie)\nSeagirt(silvie)\nEnrage(silvie, aurel)\nSlumber(silvie, aurel)\nIntertwine(aurel, silvie)\nnot Exemplary(aurel)\nSeagirt(aurel)\nnot Carbonic(aurel)\nnot Shelfy(aurel)\nEnrage(aurel, silvie)\nSlumber(aurel, silvie)\nforall x (Enrage(x, silvie) and Exemplary(silvie) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Carbonic(x) and Slumber(x, silvie) -> not Slumber(silvie, aurel))\nforall x (Seagirt(x) and Carbonic(x) -> not Shelfy(x))\nforall x (Slumber(x, aurel) and Slumber(aurel, silvie) -> Carbonic(silvie))\nSlumber(silvie, aurel) and not Slumber(aurel, silvie) -> Carbonic(silvie)\nforall x (Enrage(x, aurel) and not Enrage(aurel, silvie) -> Intertwine(silvie, aurel))\n\nnot Slumber(aurel, aurel)\n\nnot Slumber(aurel, aurel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The saree playact the maddi. The saree is flukey. The saree is eighth. The saree aphorize the maddi. The saree repatriate the maddi. The maddi playact the saree. The maddi is not flukey. The maddi is eighth. The maddi is not staunch. The maddi is not tidal. The maddi aphorize the saree. The maddi repatriate the saree. If someone aphorize the saree and the saree is flukey then they are clubby. If someone is staunch and they visit the saree then the saree does not visit the maddi. Blue, staunch people are not tidal. If someone repatriate the maddi and the maddi repatriate the saree then the saree is staunch. If the saree repatriate the maddi and the maddi does not visit the saree then the saree is staunch. If someone aphorize the maddi and the maddi does not like the saree then the saree playact the maddi. The saree playact the saree.", "logic": "\nPlayact(saree, maddi)\nFlukey(saree)\nEighth(saree)\nAphorize(saree, maddi)\nRepatriate(saree, maddi)\nPlayact(maddi, saree)\nnot Flukey(maddi)\nEighth(maddi)\nnot Staunch(maddi)\nnot Tidal(maddi)\nAphorize(maddi, saree)\nRepatriate(maddi, saree)\nforall x (Aphorize(x, saree) and Flukey(saree) -> Clubby(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Repatriate(x, saree) -> not Repatriate(saree, maddi))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Staunch(x) -> not Tidal(x))\nforall x (Repatriate(x, maddi) and Repatriate(maddi, saree) -> Staunch(saree))\nRepatriate(saree, maddi) and not Repatriate(maddi, saree) -> Staunch(saree)\nforall x (Aphorize(x, maddi) and not Aphorize(maddi, saree) -> Playact(saree, maddi))\n\nPlayact(saree, saree)\n\nPlayact(saree, saree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The alwin foreground the amalle. The alwin is unbooked. The alwin is mirrorlike. The alwin attaint the amalle. The alwin divine the amalle. The amalle foreground the alwin. The amalle is not unbooked. The amalle is mirrorlike. The amalle is not attic. The amalle is not extralegal. The amalle attaint the alwin. The amalle divine the alwin. If someone attaint the alwin and the alwin is unbooked then they are faulty. If someone is attic and they visit the alwin then the alwin does not visit the amalle. Blue, attic people are not extralegal. If someone divine the amalle and the amalle divine the alwin then the alwin is attic. If the alwin divine the amalle and the amalle does not visit the alwin then the alwin is attic. If someone attaint the amalle and the amalle does not like the alwin then the alwin foreground the amalle. The alwin does not like the alwin.", "logic": "\nForeground(alwin, amalle)\nUnbooked(alwin)\nMirrorlike(alwin)\nAttaint(alwin, amalle)\nDivine(alwin, amalle)\nForeground(amalle, alwin)\nnot Unbooked(amalle)\nMirrorlike(amalle)\nnot Attic(amalle)\nnot Extralegal(amalle)\nAttaint(amalle, alwin)\nDivine(amalle, alwin)\nforall x (Attaint(x, alwin) and Unbooked(alwin) -> Faulty(x))\nforall x (Attic(x) and Divine(x, alwin) -> not Divine(alwin, amalle))\nforall x (Mirrorlike(x) and Attic(x) -> not Extralegal(x))\nforall x (Divine(x, amalle) and Divine(amalle, alwin) -> Attic(alwin))\nDivine(alwin, amalle) and not Divine(amalle, alwin) -> Attic(alwin)\nforall x (Attaint(x, amalle) and not Attaint(amalle, alwin) -> Foreground(alwin, amalle))\n\nnot Attaint(alwin, alwin)\n\nnot Attaint(alwin, alwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "The emmalee spit the morty. The emmalee is indistinct. The emmalee is shady. The emmalee reallot the morty. The emmalee humanise the morty. The morty spit the emmalee. The morty is not indistinct. The morty is shady. The morty is not dextrous. The morty is not utter. The morty reallot the emmalee. The morty humanise the emmalee. If someone reallot the emmalee and the emmalee is indistinct then they are starchy. If someone is dextrous and they visit the emmalee then the emmalee does not visit the morty. Blue, dextrous people are not utter. If someone humanise the morty and the morty humanise the emmalee then the emmalee is dextrous. If the emmalee humanise the morty and the morty does not visit the emmalee then the emmalee is dextrous. If someone reallot the morty and the morty does not like the emmalee then the emmalee spit the morty. The emmalee humanise the emmalee.", "logic": "\nSpit(emmalee, morty)\nIndistinct(emmalee)\nShady(emmalee)\nReallot(emmalee, morty)\nHumanise(emmalee, morty)\nSpit(morty, emmalee)\nnot Indistinct(morty)\nShady(morty)\nnot Dextrous(morty)\nnot Utter(morty)\nReallot(morty, emmalee)\nHumanise(morty, emmalee)\nforall x (Reallot(x, emmalee) and Indistinct(emmalee) -> Starchy(x))\nforall x (Dextrous(x) and Humanise(x, emmalee) -> not Humanise(emmalee, morty))\nforall x (Shady(x) and Dextrous(x) -> not Utter(x))\nforall x (Humanise(x, morty) and Humanise(morty, emmalee) -> Dextrous(emmalee))\nHumanise(emmalee, morty) and not Humanise(morty, emmalee) -> Dextrous(emmalee)\nforall x (Reallot(x, morty) and not Reallot(morty, emmalee) -> Spit(emmalee, morty))\n\nHumanise(emmalee, emmalee)\n\nHumanise(emmalee, emmalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-113"} {"premises": "Lucy is ciliary. Lucy is icelandic. Zolly is icelandic. Dixie is not ciliary. Dixie is judicial. Dixie is spasmodic. Helene is rivalrous. Helene is lapidary. Helene is humpbacked. Helene is icelandic. All ciliary things are rivalrous. If Lucy is humpbacked and Lucy is not spasmodic then Lucy is judicial. If something is judicial then it is icelandic. If something is humpbacked and not ciliary then it is not icelandic. Furry things are icelandic. If something is rivalrous then it is lapidary. If Helene is judicial and Helene is icelandic then Helene is rivalrous. If something is lapidary and not ciliary then it is judicial. Lucy is ciliary.", "logic": "\nCiliary(lucy)\nIcelandic(lucy)\nIcelandic(zolly)\nnot Ciliary(dixie)\nJudicial(dixie)\nSpasmodic(dixie)\nRivalrous(helene)\nLapidary(helene)\nHumpbacked(helene)\nIcelandic(helene)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nHumpbacked(lucy) and not Spasmodic(lucy) -> Judicial(lucy)\nforall x (Judicial(x) -> Icelandic(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) and not Ciliary(x) -> not Icelandic(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Icelandic(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nJudicial(helene) and Icelandic(helene) -> Rivalrous(helene)\nforall x (Lapidary(x) and not Ciliary(x) -> Judicial(x))\n\nCiliary(lucy)\n\ntherefore Ciliary(lucy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Coretta is tumid. Coretta is sottish. Charisse is sottish. Von is not tumid. Von is external. Von is annoyed. Dora is shaggy. Dora is cloistral. Dora is stormbound. Dora is sottish. All tumid things are shaggy. If Coretta is stormbound and Coretta is not annoyed then Coretta is external. If something is external then it is sottish. If something is stormbound and not tumid then it is not sottish. Furry things are sottish. If something is shaggy then it is cloistral. If Dora is external and Dora is sottish then Dora is shaggy. If something is cloistral and not tumid then it is external. Coretta is not sottish.", "logic": "\nTumid(coretta)\nSottish(coretta)\nSottish(charisse)\nnot Tumid(von)\nExternal(von)\nAnnoyed(von)\nShaggy(dora)\nCloistral(dora)\nStormbound(dora)\nSottish(dora)\nforall x (Tumid(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nStormbound(coretta) and not Annoyed(coretta) -> External(coretta)\nforall x (External(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Stormbound(x) and not Tumid(x) -> not Sottish(x))\nforall x (Shaggy(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Shaggy(x) -> Cloistral(x))\nExternal(dora) and Sottish(dora) -> Shaggy(dora)\nforall x (Cloistral(x) and not Tumid(x) -> External(x))\n\nnot Sottish(coretta)\n\ntherefore Sottish(coretta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Bertram is shakable. Bertram is natty. Malia is natty. Kenton is not shakable. Kenton is jungian. Kenton is idle. Micheal is slippy. Micheal is revengeful. Micheal is divinatory. Micheal is natty. All shakable things are slippy. If Bertram is divinatory and Bertram is not idle then Bertram is jungian. If something is jungian then it is natty. If something is divinatory and not shakable then it is not natty. Furry things are natty. If something is slippy then it is revengeful. If Micheal is jungian and Micheal is natty then Micheal is slippy. If something is revengeful and not shakable then it is jungian. Bertram is slippy.", "logic": "\nShakable(bertram)\nNatty(bertram)\nNatty(malia)\nnot Shakable(kenton)\nJungian(kenton)\nIdle(kenton)\nSlippy(micheal)\nRevengeful(micheal)\nDivinatory(micheal)\nNatty(micheal)\nforall x (Shakable(x) -> Slippy(x))\nDivinatory(bertram) and not Idle(bertram) -> Jungian(bertram)\nforall x (Jungian(x) -> Natty(x))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) and not Shakable(x) -> not Natty(x))\nforall x (Slippy(x) -> Natty(x))\nforall x (Slippy(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nJungian(micheal) and Natty(micheal) -> Slippy(micheal)\nforall x (Revengeful(x) and not Shakable(x) -> Jungian(x))\n\nSlippy(bertram)\n\nShakable(bertram) and forall x (Shakable(x) -> Slippy(x)) -> therefore Slippy(bertram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Jessey is unbaptized. Jessey is mucky. Julienne is mucky. Staci is not unbaptized. Staci is lumbar. Staci is cosmogonic. Agnella is actable. Agnella is estonian. Agnella is nonstop. Agnella is mucky. All unbaptized things are actable. If Jessey is nonstop and Jessey is not cosmogonic then Jessey is lumbar. If something is lumbar then it is mucky. If something is nonstop and not unbaptized then it is not mucky. Furry things are mucky. If something is actable then it is estonian. If Agnella is lumbar and Agnella is mucky then Agnella is actable. If something is estonian and not unbaptized then it is lumbar. Staci is not mucky.", "logic": "\nUnbaptized(jessey)\nMucky(jessey)\nMucky(julienne)\nnot Unbaptized(staci)\nLumbar(staci)\nCosmogonic(staci)\nActable(agnella)\nEstonian(agnella)\nNonstop(agnella)\nMucky(agnella)\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Actable(x))\nNonstop(jessey) and not Cosmogonic(jessey) -> Lumbar(jessey)\nforall x (Lumbar(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and not Unbaptized(x) -> not Mucky(x))\nforall x (Actable(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Actable(x) -> Estonian(x))\nLumbar(agnella) and Mucky(agnella) -> Actable(agnella)\nforall x (Estonian(x) and not Unbaptized(x) -> Lumbar(x))\n\nnot Mucky(staci)\n\nLumbar(staci) and forall x (Lumbar(x) -> Mucky(x)) -> therefore Mucky(staci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Eba is winglike. Eba is landless. Clemmie is landless. Twyla is not winglike. Twyla is sexual. Twyla is frothing. Delphinia is unmade. Delphinia is chronic. Delphinia is armless. Delphinia is landless. All winglike things are unmade. If Eba is armless and Eba is not frothing then Eba is sexual. If something is sexual then it is landless. If something is armless and not winglike then it is not landless. Furry things are landless. If something is unmade then it is chronic. If Delphinia is sexual and Delphinia is landless then Delphinia is unmade. If something is chronic and not winglike then it is sexual. Eba is chronic.", "logic": "\nWinglike(eba)\nLandless(eba)\nLandless(clemmie)\nnot Winglike(twyla)\nSexual(twyla)\nFrothing(twyla)\nUnmade(delphinia)\nChronic(delphinia)\nArmless(delphinia)\nLandless(delphinia)\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> Unmade(x))\nArmless(eba) and not Frothing(eba) -> Sexual(eba)\nforall x (Sexual(x) -> Landless(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) and not Winglike(x) -> not Landless(x))\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Landless(x))\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Chronic(x))\nSexual(delphinia) and Landless(delphinia) -> Unmade(delphinia)\nforall x (Chronic(x) and not Winglike(x) -> Sexual(x))\n\nChronic(eba)\n\nWinglike(eba) and forall x (Winglike(x) -> Unmade(x)) -> therefore Unmade(eba) Unmade(eba) and forall x (Unmade(x) -> Chronic(x)) -> therefore Chronic(eba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Mikey is unifoliate. Mikey is planate. Lucila is planate. Burt is not unifoliate. Burt is strict. Burt is unhardened. Sebastien is peninsular. Sebastien is injectable. Sebastien is abstract. Sebastien is planate. All unifoliate things are peninsular. If Mikey is abstract and Mikey is not unhardened then Mikey is strict. If something is strict then it is planate. If something is abstract and not unifoliate then it is not planate. Furry things are planate. If something is peninsular then it is injectable. If Sebastien is strict and Sebastien is planate then Sebastien is peninsular. If something is injectable and not unifoliate then it is strict. Mikey is not injectable.", "logic": "\nUnifoliate(mikey)\nPlanate(mikey)\nPlanate(lucila)\nnot Unifoliate(burt)\nStrict(burt)\nUnhardened(burt)\nPeninsular(sebastien)\nInjectable(sebastien)\nAbstract(sebastien)\nPlanate(sebastien)\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Peninsular(x))\nAbstract(mikey) and not Unhardened(mikey) -> Strict(mikey)\nforall x (Strict(x) -> Planate(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x) and not Unifoliate(x) -> not Planate(x))\nforall x (Peninsular(x) -> Planate(x))\nforall x (Peninsular(x) -> Injectable(x))\nStrict(sebastien) and Planate(sebastien) -> Peninsular(sebastien)\nforall x (Injectable(x) and not Unifoliate(x) -> Strict(x))\n\nnot Injectable(mikey)\n\nUnifoliate(mikey) and forall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Peninsular(x)) -> therefore Peninsular(mikey) Peninsular(mikey) and forall x (Peninsular(x) -> Injectable(x)) -> therefore Injectable(mikey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Josiah is sizable. Josiah is searching. Gerhard is searching. Anneliese is not sizable. Anneliese is enigmatic. Anneliese is discovered. Teddi is economic. Teddi is striking. Teddi is horrible. Teddi is searching. All sizable things are economic. If Josiah is horrible and Josiah is not discovered then Josiah is enigmatic. If something is enigmatic then it is searching. If something is horrible and not sizable then it is not searching. Furry things are searching. If something is economic then it is striking. If Teddi is enigmatic and Teddi is searching then Teddi is economic. If something is striking and not sizable then it is enigmatic. Josiah is not enigmatic.", "logic": "\nSizable(josiah)\nSearching(josiah)\nSearching(gerhard)\nnot Sizable(anneliese)\nEnigmatic(anneliese)\nDiscovered(anneliese)\nEconomic(teddi)\nStriking(teddi)\nHorrible(teddi)\nSearching(teddi)\nforall x (Sizable(x) -> Economic(x))\nHorrible(josiah) and not Discovered(josiah) -> Enigmatic(josiah)\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) -> Searching(x))\nforall x (Horrible(x) and not Sizable(x) -> not Searching(x))\nforall x (Economic(x) -> Searching(x))\nforall x (Economic(x) -> Striking(x))\nEnigmatic(teddi) and Searching(teddi) -> Economic(teddi)\nforall x (Striking(x) and not Sizable(x) -> Enigmatic(x))\n\nnot Enigmatic(josiah)\n\nHorrible(josiah) and not Discovered(josiah) -> Enigmatic(josiah) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Carrie is excused. Carrie is clerical. Wylma is clerical. Davis is not excused. Davis is macedonian. Davis is many. Miguelita is bulimic. Miguelita is reinforced. Miguelita is sinuous. Miguelita is clerical. All excused things are bulimic. If Carrie is sinuous and Carrie is not many then Carrie is macedonian. If something is macedonian then it is clerical. If something is sinuous and not excused then it is not clerical. Furry things are clerical. If something is bulimic then it is reinforced. If Miguelita is macedonian and Miguelita is clerical then Miguelita is bulimic. If something is reinforced and not excused then it is macedonian. Wylma is reinforced.", "logic": "\nExcused(carrie)\nClerical(carrie)\nClerical(wylma)\nnot Excused(davis)\nMacedonian(davis)\nMany(davis)\nBulimic(miguelita)\nReinforced(miguelita)\nSinuous(miguelita)\nClerical(miguelita)\nforall x (Excused(x) -> Bulimic(x))\nSinuous(carrie) and not Many(carrie) -> Macedonian(carrie)\nforall x (Macedonian(x) -> Clerical(x))\nforall x (Sinuous(x) and not Excused(x) -> not Clerical(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Clerical(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nMacedonian(miguelita) and Clerical(miguelita) -> Bulimic(miguelita)\nforall x (Reinforced(x) and not Excused(x) -> Macedonian(x))\n\nReinforced(wylma)\n\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Reinforced(x)) <- forall x (Excused(x) -> Bulimic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Rudolph is baseborn. Rudolph is biaxate. Abbe is biaxate. Demeter is not baseborn. Demeter is forged. Demeter is threefold. Loreen is minus. Loreen is aplacental. Loreen is lingual. Loreen is biaxate. All baseborn things are minus. If Rudolph is lingual and Rudolph is not threefold then Rudolph is forged. If something is forged then it is biaxate. If something is lingual and not baseborn then it is not biaxate. Furry things are biaxate. If something is minus then it is aplacental. If Loreen is forged and Loreen is biaxate then Loreen is minus. If something is aplacental and not baseborn then it is forged. Abbe is not forged.", "logic": "\nBaseborn(rudolph)\nBiaxate(rudolph)\nBiaxate(abbe)\nnot Baseborn(demeter)\nForged(demeter)\nThreefold(demeter)\nMinus(loreen)\nAplacental(loreen)\nLingual(loreen)\nBiaxate(loreen)\nforall x (Baseborn(x) -> Minus(x))\nLingual(rudolph) and not Threefold(rudolph) -> Forged(rudolph)\nforall x (Forged(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Lingual(x) and not Baseborn(x) -> not Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Minus(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Minus(x) -> Aplacental(x))\nForged(loreen) and Biaxate(loreen) -> Minus(loreen)\nforall x (Aplacental(x) and not Baseborn(x) -> Forged(x))\n\nnot Forged(abbe)\n\nforall x (Aplacental(x) and not Baseborn(x) -> Forged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Cathlene is windswept. Cathlene is aloof. Genovera is aloof. Licha is not windswept. Licha is flabby. Licha is venturous. Shimon is palmatifid. Shimon is undutiful. Shimon is potholed. Shimon is aloof. All windswept things are palmatifid. If Cathlene is potholed and Cathlene is not venturous then Cathlene is flabby. If something is flabby then it is aloof. If something is potholed and not windswept then it is not aloof. Furry things are aloof. If something is palmatifid then it is undutiful. If Shimon is flabby and Shimon is aloof then Shimon is palmatifid. If something is undutiful and not windswept then it is flabby. Genovera is potholed.", "logic": "\nWindswept(cathlene)\nAloof(cathlene)\nAloof(genovera)\nnot Windswept(licha)\nFlabby(licha)\nVenturous(licha)\nPalmatifid(shimon)\nUndutiful(shimon)\nPotholed(shimon)\nAloof(shimon)\nforall x (Windswept(x) -> Palmatifid(x))\nPotholed(cathlene) and not Venturous(cathlene) -> Flabby(cathlene)\nforall x (Flabby(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Potholed(x) and not Windswept(x) -> not Aloof(x))\nforall x (Palmatifid(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Palmatifid(x) -> Undutiful(x))\nFlabby(shimon) and Aloof(shimon) -> Palmatifid(shimon)\nforall x (Undutiful(x) and not Windswept(x) -> Flabby(x))\n\nPotholed(genovera)\n\nPotholed(genovera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Hilde is tickling. Hilde is sedentary. Jacintha is sedentary. Fremont is not tickling. Fremont is believable. Fremont is unyielding. Geeta is swordlike. Geeta is ultimo. Geeta is untilled. Geeta is sedentary. All tickling things are swordlike. If Hilde is untilled and Hilde is not unyielding then Hilde is believable. If something is believable then it is sedentary. If something is untilled and not tickling then it is not sedentary. Furry things are sedentary. If something is swordlike then it is ultimo. If Geeta is believable and Geeta is sedentary then Geeta is swordlike. If something is ultimo and not tickling then it is believable. Jacintha is not unyielding.", "logic": "\nTickling(hilde)\nSedentary(hilde)\nSedentary(jacintha)\nnot Tickling(fremont)\nBelievable(fremont)\nUnyielding(fremont)\nSwordlike(geeta)\nUltimo(geeta)\nUntilled(geeta)\nSedentary(geeta)\nforall x (Tickling(x) -> Swordlike(x))\nUntilled(hilde) and not Unyielding(hilde) -> Believable(hilde)\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Untilled(x) and not Tickling(x) -> not Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Swordlike(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Swordlike(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nBelievable(geeta) and Sedentary(geeta) -> Swordlike(geeta)\nforall x (Ultimo(x) and not Tickling(x) -> Believable(x))\n\nnot Unyielding(jacintha)\n\nnot Unyielding(jacintha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Ariela is ibsenian. Ariela is beardown. Paddie is beardown. Traci is not ibsenian. Traci is pissed. Traci is lymphoid. Elsinore is noisy. Elsinore is deciduous. Elsinore is scary. Elsinore is beardown. All ibsenian things are noisy. If Ariela is scary and Ariela is not lymphoid then Ariela is pissed. If something is pissed then it is beardown. If something is scary and not ibsenian then it is not beardown. Furry things are beardown. If something is noisy then it is deciduous. If Elsinore is pissed and Elsinore is beardown then Elsinore is noisy. If something is deciduous and not ibsenian then it is pissed. Traci is scary.", "logic": "\nIbsenian(ariela)\nBeardown(ariela)\nBeardown(paddie)\nnot Ibsenian(traci)\nPissed(traci)\nLymphoid(traci)\nNoisy(elsinore)\nDeciduous(elsinore)\nScary(elsinore)\nBeardown(elsinore)\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Noisy(x))\nScary(ariela) and not Lymphoid(ariela) -> Pissed(ariela)\nforall x (Pissed(x) -> Beardown(x))\nforall x (Scary(x) and not Ibsenian(x) -> not Beardown(x))\nforall x (Noisy(x) -> Beardown(x))\nforall x (Noisy(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nPissed(elsinore) and Beardown(elsinore) -> Noisy(elsinore)\nforall x (Deciduous(x) and not Ibsenian(x) -> Pissed(x))\n\nScary(traci)\n\nScary(traci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1584"} {"premises": "Benito is not zonal. Twyla is prejudiced. Twyla is fivefold. Twyla is ninetieth. Twyla is ferned. Twyla is forested. Twyla is commanding. Twyla is zonal. Ardella is prejudiced. Ardella is ferned. Ardella is forested. Ardella is commanding. If something is forested then it is commanding. Kind things are commanding. If something is ninetieth and not forested then it is not fivefold. If Benito is not zonal then Benito is ninetieth. If Twyla is forested and Twyla is not commanding then Twyla is fivefold. If Twyla is prejudiced and Twyla is not zonal then Twyla is fivefold. Twyla is zonal.", "logic": "\nnot Zonal(benito)\nPrejudiced(twyla)\nFivefold(twyla)\nNinetieth(twyla)\nFerned(twyla)\nForested(twyla)\nCommanding(twyla)\nZonal(twyla)\nPrejudiced(ardella)\nFerned(ardella)\nForested(ardella)\nCommanding(ardella)\nforall x (Forested(x) -> Commanding(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) -> Commanding(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) and not Forested(x) -> not Fivefold(x))\nnot Zonal(benito) -> Ninetieth(benito)\nForested(twyla) and not Commanding(twyla) -> Fivefold(twyla)\nPrejudiced(twyla) and not Zonal(twyla) -> Fivefold(twyla)\n\nZonal(twyla)\n\ntherefore Zonal(twyla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Welbie is not nonviable. Lilli is austere. Lilli is subaquatic. Lilli is paranoid. Lilli is spoken. Lilli is markovian. Lilli is westward. Lilli is nonviable. Frazier is austere. Frazier is spoken. Frazier is markovian. Frazier is westward. If something is markovian then it is westward. Kind things are westward. If something is paranoid and not markovian then it is not subaquatic. If Welbie is not nonviable then Welbie is paranoid. If Lilli is markovian and Lilli is not westward then Lilli is subaquatic. If Lilli is austere and Lilli is not nonviable then Lilli is subaquatic. Frazier is not markovian.", "logic": "\nnot Nonviable(welbie)\nAustere(lilli)\nSubaquatic(lilli)\nParanoid(lilli)\nSpoken(lilli)\nMarkovian(lilli)\nWestward(lilli)\nNonviable(lilli)\nAustere(frazier)\nSpoken(frazier)\nMarkovian(frazier)\nWestward(frazier)\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Westward(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) -> Westward(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) and not Markovian(x) -> not Subaquatic(x))\nnot Nonviable(welbie) -> Paranoid(welbie)\nMarkovian(lilli) and not Westward(lilli) -> Subaquatic(lilli)\nAustere(lilli) and not Nonviable(lilli) -> Subaquatic(lilli)\n\nnot Markovian(frazier)\n\ntherefore Markovian(frazier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Clayborne is not demolished. Don is aperiodic. Don is algometric. Don is ghostlike. Don is holophytic. Don is freehand. Don is frictional. Don is demolished. Edwina is aperiodic. Edwina is holophytic. Edwina is freehand. Edwina is frictional. If something is freehand then it is frictional. Kind things are frictional. If something is ghostlike and not freehand then it is not algometric. If Clayborne is not demolished then Clayborne is ghostlike. If Don is freehand and Don is not frictional then Don is algometric. If Don is aperiodic and Don is not demolished then Don is algometric. Clayborne is ghostlike.", "logic": "\nnot Demolished(clayborne)\nAperiodic(don)\nAlgometric(don)\nGhostlike(don)\nHolophytic(don)\nFreehand(don)\nFrictional(don)\nDemolished(don)\nAperiodic(edwina)\nHolophytic(edwina)\nFreehand(edwina)\nFrictional(edwina)\nforall x (Freehand(x) -> Frictional(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Frictional(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) and not Freehand(x) -> not Algometric(x))\nnot Demolished(clayborne) -> Ghostlike(clayborne)\nFreehand(don) and not Frictional(don) -> Algometric(don)\nAperiodic(don) and not Demolished(don) -> Algometric(don)\n\nGhostlike(clayborne)\n\nnot Demolished(clayborne) and not Demolished(clayborne) -> Ghostlike(clayborne) -> therefore Ghostlike(clayborne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Layton is not undersize. Noellyn is germicidal. Noellyn is shipshape. Noellyn is zymolytic. Noellyn is bumbling. Noellyn is posed. Noellyn is killable. Noellyn is undersize. Wilt is germicidal. Wilt is bumbling. Wilt is posed. Wilt is killable. If something is posed then it is killable. Kind things are killable. If something is zymolytic and not posed then it is not shipshape. If Layton is not undersize then Layton is zymolytic. If Noellyn is posed and Noellyn is not killable then Noellyn is shipshape. If Noellyn is germicidal and Noellyn is not undersize then Noellyn is shipshape. Layton is not zymolytic.", "logic": "\nnot Undersize(layton)\nGermicidal(noellyn)\nShipshape(noellyn)\nZymolytic(noellyn)\nBumbling(noellyn)\nPosed(noellyn)\nKillable(noellyn)\nUndersize(noellyn)\nGermicidal(wilt)\nBumbling(wilt)\nPosed(wilt)\nKillable(wilt)\nforall x (Posed(x) -> Killable(x))\nforall x (Zymolytic(x) -> Killable(x))\nforall x (Zymolytic(x) and not Posed(x) -> not Shipshape(x))\nnot Undersize(layton) -> Zymolytic(layton)\nPosed(noellyn) and not Killable(noellyn) -> Shipshape(noellyn)\nGermicidal(noellyn) and not Undersize(noellyn) -> Shipshape(noellyn)\n\nnot Zymolytic(layton)\n\nnot Undersize(layton) and not Undersize(layton) -> Zymolytic(layton) -> therefore Zymolytic(layton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Kala is not customary. Patrick is worshipful. Patrick is frustrated. Patrick is oversewn. Patrick is coltish. Patrick is briefless. Patrick is sheared. Patrick is customary. Junie is worshipful. Junie is coltish. Junie is briefless. Junie is sheared. If something is briefless then it is sheared. Kind things are sheared. If something is oversewn and not briefless then it is not frustrated. If Kala is not customary then Kala is oversewn. If Patrick is briefless and Patrick is not sheared then Patrick is frustrated. If Patrick is worshipful and Patrick is not customary then Patrick is frustrated. Kala is sheared.", "logic": "\nnot Customary(kala)\nWorshipful(patrick)\nFrustrated(patrick)\nOversewn(patrick)\nColtish(patrick)\nBriefless(patrick)\nSheared(patrick)\nCustomary(patrick)\nWorshipful(junie)\nColtish(junie)\nBriefless(junie)\nSheared(junie)\nforall x (Briefless(x) -> Sheared(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) -> Sheared(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) and not Briefless(x) -> not Frustrated(x))\nnot Customary(kala) -> Oversewn(kala)\nBriefless(patrick) and not Sheared(patrick) -> Frustrated(patrick)\nWorshipful(patrick) and not Customary(patrick) -> Frustrated(patrick)\n\nSheared(kala)\n\nnot Customary(kala) and not Customary(kala) -> Oversewn(kala) -> therefore Oversewn(kala) Oversewn(kala) and forall x (Oversewn(x) -> Sheared(x)) -> therefore Sheared(kala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Umeko is not morganatic. Etta is louvered. Etta is latticed. Etta is swelled. Etta is homogenous. Etta is yogistic. Etta is pontifical. Etta is morganatic. Jillian is louvered. Jillian is homogenous. Jillian is yogistic. Jillian is pontifical. If something is yogistic then it is pontifical. Kind things are pontifical. If something is swelled and not yogistic then it is not latticed. If Umeko is not morganatic then Umeko is swelled. If Etta is yogistic and Etta is not pontifical then Etta is latticed. If Etta is louvered and Etta is not morganatic then Etta is latticed. Umeko is not pontifical.", "logic": "\nnot Morganatic(umeko)\nLouvered(etta)\nLatticed(etta)\nSwelled(etta)\nHomogenous(etta)\nYogistic(etta)\nPontifical(etta)\nMorganatic(etta)\nLouvered(jillian)\nHomogenous(jillian)\nYogistic(jillian)\nPontifical(jillian)\nforall x (Yogistic(x) -> Pontifical(x))\nforall x (Swelled(x) -> Pontifical(x))\nforall x (Swelled(x) and not Yogistic(x) -> not Latticed(x))\nnot Morganatic(umeko) -> Swelled(umeko)\nYogistic(etta) and not Pontifical(etta) -> Latticed(etta)\nLouvered(etta) and not Morganatic(etta) -> Latticed(etta)\n\nnot Pontifical(umeko)\n\nnot Morganatic(umeko) and not Morganatic(umeko) -> Swelled(umeko) -> therefore Swelled(umeko) Swelled(umeko) and forall x (Swelled(x) -> Pontifical(x)) -> therefore Pontifical(umeko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Holly is not eighteen. Dallas is cranial. Dallas is avascular. Dallas is trimmed. Dallas is political. Dallas is acquirable. Dallas is center. Dallas is eighteen. Dominick is cranial. Dominick is political. Dominick is acquirable. Dominick is center. If something is acquirable then it is center. Kind things are center. If something is trimmed and not acquirable then it is not avascular. If Holly is not eighteen then Holly is trimmed. If Dallas is acquirable and Dallas is not center then Dallas is avascular. If Dallas is cranial and Dallas is not eighteen then Dallas is avascular. Holly is not avascular.", "logic": "\nnot Eighteen(holly)\nCranial(dallas)\nAvascular(dallas)\nTrimmed(dallas)\nPolitical(dallas)\nAcquirable(dallas)\nCenter(dallas)\nEighteen(dallas)\nCranial(dominick)\nPolitical(dominick)\nAcquirable(dominick)\nCenter(dominick)\nforall x (Acquirable(x) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Trimmed(x) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Trimmed(x) and not Acquirable(x) -> not Avascular(x))\nnot Eighteen(holly) -> Trimmed(holly)\nAcquirable(dallas) and not Center(dallas) -> Avascular(dallas)\nCranial(dallas) and not Eighteen(dallas) -> Avascular(dallas)\n\nnot Avascular(holly)\n\nnot Avascular(holly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Sylvie is not cacogenic. Giraud is repressive. Giraud is actuarial. Giraud is butyric. Giraud is callable. Giraud is meagerly. Giraud is gainful. Giraud is cacogenic. Douglis is repressive. Douglis is callable. Douglis is meagerly. Douglis is gainful. If something is meagerly then it is gainful. Kind things are gainful. If something is butyric and not meagerly then it is not actuarial. If Sylvie is not cacogenic then Sylvie is butyric. If Giraud is meagerly and Giraud is not gainful then Giraud is actuarial. If Giraud is repressive and Giraud is not cacogenic then Giraud is actuarial. Douglis is actuarial.", "logic": "\nnot Cacogenic(sylvie)\nRepressive(giraud)\nActuarial(giraud)\nButyric(giraud)\nCallable(giraud)\nMeagerly(giraud)\nGainful(giraud)\nCacogenic(giraud)\nRepressive(douglis)\nCallable(douglis)\nMeagerly(douglis)\nGainful(douglis)\nforall x (Meagerly(x) -> Gainful(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) -> Gainful(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) and not Meagerly(x) -> not Actuarial(x))\nnot Cacogenic(sylvie) -> Butyric(sylvie)\nMeagerly(giraud) and not Gainful(giraud) -> Actuarial(giraud)\nRepressive(giraud) and not Cacogenic(giraud) -> Actuarial(giraud)\n\nActuarial(douglis)\n\nActuarial(douglis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Chase is not jugular. Nealson is edifying. Nealson is municipal. Nealson is descendant. Nealson is creole. Nealson is saxicolous. Nealson is rimeless. Nealson is jugular. Milka is edifying. Milka is creole. Milka is saxicolous. Milka is rimeless. If something is saxicolous then it is rimeless. Kind things are rimeless. If something is descendant and not saxicolous then it is not municipal. If Chase is not jugular then Chase is descendant. If Nealson is saxicolous and Nealson is not rimeless then Nealson is municipal. If Nealson is edifying and Nealson is not jugular then Nealson is municipal. Chase is not creole.", "logic": "\nnot Jugular(chase)\nEdifying(nealson)\nMunicipal(nealson)\nDescendant(nealson)\nCreole(nealson)\nSaxicolous(nealson)\nRimeless(nealson)\nJugular(nealson)\nEdifying(milka)\nCreole(milka)\nSaxicolous(milka)\nRimeless(milka)\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Descendant(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Descendant(x) and not Saxicolous(x) -> not Municipal(x))\nnot Jugular(chase) -> Descendant(chase)\nSaxicolous(nealson) and not Rimeless(nealson) -> Municipal(nealson)\nEdifying(nealson) and not Jugular(nealson) -> Municipal(nealson)\n\nnot Creole(chase)\n\nnot Creole(chase) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Giacinta is not interbred. Brice is bountied. Brice is genoese. Brice is leafless. Brice is scots. Brice is vibratory. Brice is strained. Brice is interbred. Shumeet is bountied. Shumeet is scots. Shumeet is vibratory. Shumeet is strained. If something is vibratory then it is strained. Kind things are strained. If something is leafless and not vibratory then it is not genoese. If Giacinta is not interbred then Giacinta is leafless. If Brice is vibratory and Brice is not strained then Brice is genoese. If Brice is bountied and Brice is not interbred then Brice is genoese. Shumeet is interbred.", "logic": "\nnot Interbred(giacinta)\nBountied(brice)\nGenoese(brice)\nLeafless(brice)\nScots(brice)\nVibratory(brice)\nStrained(brice)\nInterbred(brice)\nBountied(shumeet)\nScots(shumeet)\nVibratory(shumeet)\nStrained(shumeet)\nforall x (Vibratory(x) -> Strained(x))\nforall x (Leafless(x) -> Strained(x))\nforall x (Leafless(x) and not Vibratory(x) -> not Genoese(x))\nnot Interbred(giacinta) -> Leafless(giacinta)\nVibratory(brice) and not Strained(brice) -> Genoese(brice)\nBountied(brice) and not Interbred(brice) -> Genoese(brice)\n\nInterbred(shumeet)\n\nInterbred(shumeet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Mersey is not odourless. Tiena is learned. Tiena is classified. Tiena is sentient. Tiena is unsworn. Tiena is liverish. Tiena is scripted. Tiena is odourless. Osborn is learned. Osborn is unsworn. Osborn is liverish. Osborn is scripted. If something is liverish then it is scripted. Kind things are scripted. If something is sentient and not liverish then it is not classified. If Mersey is not odourless then Mersey is sentient. If Tiena is liverish and Tiena is not scripted then Tiena is classified. If Tiena is learned and Tiena is not odourless then Tiena is classified. Mersey is not liverish.", "logic": "\nnot Odourless(mersey)\nLearned(tiena)\nClassified(tiena)\nSentient(tiena)\nUnsworn(tiena)\nLiverish(tiena)\nScripted(tiena)\nOdourless(tiena)\nLearned(osborn)\nUnsworn(osborn)\nLiverish(osborn)\nScripted(osborn)\nforall x (Liverish(x) -> Scripted(x))\nforall x (Sentient(x) -> Scripted(x))\nforall x (Sentient(x) and not Liverish(x) -> not Classified(x))\nnot Odourless(mersey) -> Sentient(mersey)\nLiverish(tiena) and not Scripted(tiena) -> Classified(tiena)\nLearned(tiena) and not Odourless(tiena) -> Classified(tiena)\n\nnot Liverish(mersey)\n\nnot Liverish(mersey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Sybyl is not xxii. Benedict is incredible. Benedict is rippled. Benedict is trilobate. Benedict is quenchless. Benedict is knobby. Benedict is heady. Benedict is xxii. Hesther is incredible. Hesther is quenchless. Hesther is knobby. Hesther is heady. If something is knobby then it is heady. Kind things are heady. If something is trilobate and not knobby then it is not rippled. If Sybyl is not xxii then Sybyl is trilobate. If Benedict is knobby and Benedict is not heady then Benedict is rippled. If Benedict is incredible and Benedict is not xxii then Benedict is rippled. Sybyl is incredible.", "logic": "\nnot Xxii(sybyl)\nIncredible(benedict)\nRippled(benedict)\nTrilobate(benedict)\nQuenchless(benedict)\nKnobby(benedict)\nHeady(benedict)\nXxii(benedict)\nIncredible(hesther)\nQuenchless(hesther)\nKnobby(hesther)\nHeady(hesther)\nforall x (Knobby(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) and not Knobby(x) -> not Rippled(x))\nnot Xxii(sybyl) -> Trilobate(sybyl)\nKnobby(benedict) and not Heady(benedict) -> Rippled(benedict)\nIncredible(benedict) and not Xxii(benedict) -> Rippled(benedict)\n\nIncredible(sybyl)\n\nIncredible(sybyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-60"} {"premises": "Prissie is not weird. Prissie is soothing. Prissie is hueless. Prissie is booted. Prissie is not energetic. Prissie is unchanged. Hatty is not weird. Hatty is soothing. Hatty is booted. Hatty is not unchanged. Taryn is energetic. Taryn is unchanged. Nice people are weird. If someone is energetic then they are armlike. Hatty is not weird.", "logic": "\nnot Weird(prissie)\nSoothing(prissie)\nHueless(prissie)\nBooted(prissie)\nnot Energetic(prissie)\nUnchanged(prissie)\nnot Weird(hatty)\nSoothing(hatty)\nBooted(hatty)\nnot Unchanged(hatty)\nEnergetic(taryn)\nUnchanged(taryn)\nforall x (Armlike(x) -> Weird(x))\nforall x (Energetic(x) -> Armlike(x))\n\nnot Weird(hatty)\n\ntherefore not Weird(hatty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Charles is not leftmost. Charles is grouped. Charles is fallen. Charles is quack. Charles is not apodictic. Charles is tubercular. Aleck is not leftmost. Aleck is grouped. Aleck is quack. Aleck is not tubercular. Dalia is apodictic. Dalia is tubercular. Nice people are leftmost. If someone is apodictic then they are aleutian. Dalia is not tubercular.", "logic": "\nnot Leftmost(charles)\nGrouped(charles)\nFallen(charles)\nQuack(charles)\nnot Apodictic(charles)\nTubercular(charles)\nnot Leftmost(aleck)\nGrouped(aleck)\nQuack(aleck)\nnot Tubercular(aleck)\nApodictic(dalia)\nTubercular(dalia)\nforall x (Aleutian(x) -> Leftmost(x))\nforall x (Apodictic(x) -> Aleutian(x))\n\nnot Tubercular(dalia)\n\ntherefore Tubercular(dalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Julieta is not antacid. Julieta is galore. Julieta is nonracial. Julieta is fungible. Julieta is not heterodyne. Julieta is miraculous. Ardenia is not antacid. Ardenia is galore. Ardenia is fungible. Ardenia is not miraculous. Bertha is heterodyne. Bertha is miraculous. Nice people are antacid. If someone is heterodyne then they are hyaloid. Bertha is hyaloid.", "logic": "\nnot Antacid(julieta)\nGalore(julieta)\nNonracial(julieta)\nFungible(julieta)\nnot Heterodyne(julieta)\nMiraculous(julieta)\nnot Antacid(ardenia)\nGalore(ardenia)\nFungible(ardenia)\nnot Miraculous(ardenia)\nHeterodyne(bertha)\nMiraculous(bertha)\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Antacid(x))\nforall x (Heterodyne(x) -> Hyaloid(x))\n\nHyaloid(bertha)\n\nHeterodyne(bertha) and forall x (Heterodyne(x) -> Hyaloid(x)) -> therefore Hyaloid(bertha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Haywood is not modifiable. Haywood is colourful. Haywood is relaxed. Haywood is grumpy. Haywood is not swanky. Haywood is excitant. Grady is not modifiable. Grady is colourful. Grady is grumpy. Grady is not excitant. Renata is swanky. Renata is excitant. Nice people are modifiable. If someone is swanky then they are barbaric. Renata is not barbaric.", "logic": "\nnot Modifiable(haywood)\nColourful(haywood)\nRelaxed(haywood)\nGrumpy(haywood)\nnot Swanky(haywood)\nExcitant(haywood)\nnot Modifiable(grady)\nColourful(grady)\nGrumpy(grady)\nnot Excitant(grady)\nSwanky(renata)\nExcitant(renata)\nforall x (Barbaric(x) -> Modifiable(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) -> Barbaric(x))\n\nnot Barbaric(renata)\n\nSwanky(renata) and forall x (Swanky(x) -> Barbaric(x)) -> therefore Barbaric(renata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Margeaux is not parasitic. Margeaux is overnight. Margeaux is postmodern. Margeaux is secure. Margeaux is not fettered. Margeaux is aery. Bryna is not parasitic. Bryna is overnight. Bryna is secure. Bryna is not aery. Hilde is fettered. Hilde is aery. Nice people are parasitic. If someone is fettered then they are vulnerable. Hilde is parasitic.", "logic": "\nnot Parasitic(margeaux)\nOvernight(margeaux)\nPostmodern(margeaux)\nSecure(margeaux)\nnot Fettered(margeaux)\nAery(margeaux)\nnot Parasitic(bryna)\nOvernight(bryna)\nSecure(bryna)\nnot Aery(bryna)\nFettered(hilde)\nAery(hilde)\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nforall x (Fettered(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\n\nParasitic(hilde)\n\nFettered(hilde) and forall x (Fettered(x) -> Vulnerable(x)) -> therefore Vulnerable(hilde) Vulnerable(hilde) and forall x (Vulnerable(x) -> Parasitic(x)) -> therefore Parasitic(hilde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Gerta is not graspable. Gerta is populated. Gerta is erotic. Gerta is veridical. Gerta is not selected. Gerta is associate. Jacynth is not graspable. Jacynth is populated. Jacynth is veridical. Jacynth is not associate. Gilligan is selected. Gilligan is associate. Nice people are graspable. If someone is selected then they are irritable. Gilligan is not graspable.", "logic": "\nnot Graspable(gerta)\nPopulated(gerta)\nErotic(gerta)\nVeridical(gerta)\nnot Selected(gerta)\nAssociate(gerta)\nnot Graspable(jacynth)\nPopulated(jacynth)\nVeridical(jacynth)\nnot Associate(jacynth)\nSelected(gilligan)\nAssociate(gilligan)\nforall x (Irritable(x) -> Graspable(x))\nforall x (Selected(x) -> Irritable(x))\n\nnot Graspable(gilligan)\n\nSelected(gilligan) and forall x (Selected(x) -> Irritable(x)) -> therefore Irritable(gilligan) Irritable(gilligan) and forall x (Irritable(x) -> Graspable(x)) -> therefore Graspable(gilligan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Erena is not aerial. Erena is asteroidal. Erena is caroline. Erena is inguinal. Erena is not sexy. Erena is enzootic. Engelbart is not aerial. Engelbart is asteroidal. Engelbart is inguinal. Engelbart is not enzootic. Gert is sexy. Gert is enzootic. Nice people are aerial. If someone is sexy then they are cognizant. Erena is not cognizant.", "logic": "\nnot Aerial(erena)\nAsteroidal(erena)\nCaroline(erena)\nInguinal(erena)\nnot Sexy(erena)\nEnzootic(erena)\nnot Aerial(engelbart)\nAsteroidal(engelbart)\nInguinal(engelbart)\nnot Enzootic(engelbart)\nSexy(gert)\nEnzootic(gert)\nforall x (Cognizant(x) -> Aerial(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) -> Cognizant(x))\n\nnot Cognizant(erena)\n\nforall x (Sexy(x) -> Cognizant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Berna is not unforced. Berna is consultive. Berna is basiscopic. Berna is practiced. Berna is not causal. Berna is uricosuric. Ladonna is not unforced. Ladonna is consultive. Ladonna is practiced. Ladonna is not uricosuric. Caterina is causal. Caterina is uricosuric. Nice people are unforced. If someone is causal then they are toasted. Ladonna is toasted.", "logic": "\nnot Unforced(berna)\nConsultive(berna)\nBasiscopic(berna)\nPracticed(berna)\nnot Causal(berna)\nUricosuric(berna)\nnot Unforced(ladonna)\nConsultive(ladonna)\nPracticed(ladonna)\nnot Uricosuric(ladonna)\nCausal(caterina)\nUricosuric(caterina)\nforall x (Toasted(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Causal(x) -> Toasted(x))\n\nToasted(ladonna)\n\nforall x (Causal(x) -> Toasted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Ami is not pastelike. Ami is dwindling. Ami is milled. Ami is frigorific. Ami is not ternary. Ami is intoxicant. Franklyn is not pastelike. Franklyn is dwindling. Franklyn is frigorific. Franklyn is not intoxicant. Tamma is ternary. Tamma is intoxicant. Nice people are pastelike. If someone is ternary then they are anosmic. Tamma is not dwindling.", "logic": "\nnot Pastelike(ami)\nDwindling(ami)\nMilled(ami)\nFrigorific(ami)\nnot Ternary(ami)\nIntoxicant(ami)\nnot Pastelike(franklyn)\nDwindling(franklyn)\nFrigorific(franklyn)\nnot Intoxicant(franklyn)\nTernary(tamma)\nIntoxicant(tamma)\nforall x (Anosmic(x) -> Pastelike(x))\nforall x (Ternary(x) -> Anosmic(x))\n\nnot Dwindling(tamma)\n\nnot Dwindling(tamma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Emlynn is not scoured. Emlynn is cyrillic. Emlynn is incapable. Emlynn is valueless. Emlynn is not impenitent. Emlynn is ameboid. Desmund is not scoured. Desmund is cyrillic. Desmund is valueless. Desmund is not ameboid. Ellissa is impenitent. Ellissa is ameboid. Nice people are scoured. If someone is impenitent then they are drained. Desmund is impenitent.", "logic": "\nnot Scoured(emlynn)\nCyrillic(emlynn)\nIncapable(emlynn)\nValueless(emlynn)\nnot Impenitent(emlynn)\nAmeboid(emlynn)\nnot Scoured(desmund)\nCyrillic(desmund)\nValueless(desmund)\nnot Ameboid(desmund)\nImpenitent(ellissa)\nAmeboid(ellissa)\nforall x (Drained(x) -> Scoured(x))\nforall x (Impenitent(x) -> Drained(x))\n\nImpenitent(desmund)\n\nImpenitent(desmund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Nessy is not dour. Nessy is fitful. Nessy is symbiotic. Nessy is quaternate. Nessy is not ungraded. Nessy is rubicund. Julieta is not dour. Julieta is fitful. Julieta is quaternate. Julieta is not rubicund. Marius is ungraded. Marius is rubicund. Nice people are dour. If someone is ungraded then they are bicornuous. Marius is not quaternate.", "logic": "\nnot Dour(nessy)\nFitful(nessy)\nSymbiotic(nessy)\nQuaternate(nessy)\nnot Ungraded(nessy)\nRubicund(nessy)\nnot Dour(julieta)\nFitful(julieta)\nQuaternate(julieta)\nnot Rubicund(julieta)\nUngraded(marius)\nRubicund(marius)\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Dour(x))\nforall x (Ungraded(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\n\nnot Quaternate(marius)\n\nnot Quaternate(marius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Tammara is not apish. Tammara is springlike. Tammara is pesky. Tammara is wheelless. Tammara is not mysterious. Tammara is cannibalic. Alexi is not apish. Alexi is springlike. Alexi is wheelless. Alexi is not cannibalic. Artur is mysterious. Artur is cannibalic. Nice people are apish. If someone is mysterious then they are studious. Artur is pesky.", "logic": "\nnot Apish(tammara)\nSpringlike(tammara)\nPesky(tammara)\nWheelless(tammara)\nnot Mysterious(tammara)\nCannibalic(tammara)\nnot Apish(alexi)\nSpringlike(alexi)\nWheelless(alexi)\nnot Cannibalic(alexi)\nMysterious(artur)\nCannibalic(artur)\nforall x (Studious(x) -> Apish(x))\nforall x (Mysterious(x) -> Studious(x))\n\nPesky(artur)\n\nPesky(artur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1484"} {"premises": "Cathy is anatomical. Cathy is employed. Cathy is sculpted. Cathy is coinciding. Cathy is unthankful. Inger is not anatomical. Inger is not employed. Inger is unlittered. Inger is not said. Inger is coinciding. Kaylee is anatomical. Kaylee is employed. Kaylee is unlittered. Kaylee is not said. Kaylee is coinciding. If something is unlittered and not sculpted then it is employed. All sculpted, employed things are anatomical. Furry, said things are unlittered. All anatomical things are coinciding. If Cathy is sculpted then Cathy is said. If Cathy is anatomical and Cathy is sculpted then Cathy is coinciding. Kaylee is anatomical.", "logic": "\nAnatomical(cathy)\nEmployed(cathy)\nSculpted(cathy)\nCoinciding(cathy)\nUnthankful(cathy)\nnot Anatomical(inger)\nnot Employed(inger)\nUnlittered(inger)\nnot Said(inger)\nCoinciding(inger)\nAnatomical(kaylee)\nEmployed(kaylee)\nUnlittered(kaylee)\nnot Said(kaylee)\nCoinciding(kaylee)\nforall x (Unlittered(x) and not Sculpted(x) -> Employed(x))\nforall x (Sculpted(x) and Employed(x) -> Anatomical(x))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) and Said(x) -> Unlittered(x))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Coinciding(x))\nSculpted(cathy) -> Said(cathy)\nAnatomical(cathy) and Sculpted(cathy) -> Coinciding(cathy)\n\nAnatomical(kaylee)\n\ntherefore Anatomical(kaylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Bearnard is prostate. Bearnard is noncaloric. Bearnard is bowelless. Bearnard is hebraical. Bearnard is inhalant. Hayward is not prostate. Hayward is not noncaloric. Hayward is strep. Hayward is not tyrolese. Hayward is hebraical. Eldon is prostate. Eldon is noncaloric. Eldon is strep. Eldon is not tyrolese. Eldon is hebraical. If something is strep and not bowelless then it is noncaloric. All bowelless, noncaloric things are prostate. Furry, tyrolese things are strep. All prostate things are hebraical. If Bearnard is bowelless then Bearnard is tyrolese. If Bearnard is prostate and Bearnard is bowelless then Bearnard is hebraical. Eldon is not hebraical.", "logic": "\nProstate(bearnard)\nNoncaloric(bearnard)\nBowelless(bearnard)\nHebraical(bearnard)\nInhalant(bearnard)\nnot Prostate(hayward)\nnot Noncaloric(hayward)\nStrep(hayward)\nnot Tyrolese(hayward)\nHebraical(hayward)\nProstate(eldon)\nNoncaloric(eldon)\nStrep(eldon)\nnot Tyrolese(eldon)\nHebraical(eldon)\nforall x (Strep(x) and not Bowelless(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Bowelless(x) and Noncaloric(x) -> Prostate(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) and Tyrolese(x) -> Strep(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nBowelless(bearnard) -> Tyrolese(bearnard)\nProstate(bearnard) and Bowelless(bearnard) -> Hebraical(bearnard)\n\nnot Hebraical(eldon)\n\ntherefore Hebraical(eldon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Esteban is historic. Esteban is honeyed. Esteban is sinister. Esteban is vermilion. Esteban is diarrhoeic. Dean is not historic. Dean is not honeyed. Dean is damning. Dean is not dependent. Dean is vermilion. Evangelia is historic. Evangelia is honeyed. Evangelia is damning. Evangelia is not dependent. Evangelia is vermilion. If something is damning and not sinister then it is honeyed. All sinister, honeyed things are historic. Furry, dependent things are damning. All historic things are vermilion. If Esteban is sinister then Esteban is dependent. If Esteban is historic and Esteban is sinister then Esteban is vermilion. Esteban is dependent.", "logic": "\nHistoric(esteban)\nHoneyed(esteban)\nSinister(esteban)\nVermilion(esteban)\nDiarrhoeic(esteban)\nnot Historic(dean)\nnot Honeyed(dean)\nDamning(dean)\nnot Dependent(dean)\nVermilion(dean)\nHistoric(evangelia)\nHoneyed(evangelia)\nDamning(evangelia)\nnot Dependent(evangelia)\nVermilion(evangelia)\nforall x (Damning(x) and not Sinister(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Sinister(x) and Honeyed(x) -> Historic(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) and Dependent(x) -> Damning(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Vermilion(x))\nSinister(esteban) -> Dependent(esteban)\nHistoric(esteban) and Sinister(esteban) -> Vermilion(esteban)\n\nDependent(esteban)\n\nSinister(esteban) and Sinister(esteban) -> Dependent(esteban) -> therefore Dependent(esteban)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Tildie is gauzy. Tildie is agone. Tildie is bust. Tildie is shadowed. Tildie is crying. Evangelin is not gauzy. Evangelin is not agone. Evangelin is petalled. Evangelin is not coenobitic. Evangelin is shadowed. Lydie is gauzy. Lydie is agone. Lydie is petalled. Lydie is not coenobitic. Lydie is shadowed. If something is petalled and not bust then it is agone. All bust, agone things are gauzy. Furry, coenobitic things are petalled. All gauzy things are shadowed. If Tildie is bust then Tildie is coenobitic. If Tildie is gauzy and Tildie is bust then Tildie is shadowed. Tildie is not coenobitic.", "logic": "\nGauzy(tildie)\nAgone(tildie)\nBust(tildie)\nShadowed(tildie)\nCrying(tildie)\nnot Gauzy(evangelin)\nnot Agone(evangelin)\nPetalled(evangelin)\nnot Coenobitic(evangelin)\nShadowed(evangelin)\nGauzy(lydie)\nAgone(lydie)\nPetalled(lydie)\nnot Coenobitic(lydie)\nShadowed(lydie)\nforall x (Petalled(x) and not Bust(x) -> Agone(x))\nforall x (Bust(x) and Agone(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) and Coenobitic(x) -> Petalled(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Shadowed(x))\nBust(tildie) -> Coenobitic(tildie)\nGauzy(tildie) and Bust(tildie) -> Shadowed(tildie)\n\nnot Coenobitic(tildie)\n\nBust(tildie) and Bust(tildie) -> Coenobitic(tildie) -> therefore Coenobitic(tildie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Anselm is summative. Anselm is shadowy. Anselm is nett. Anselm is oversewn. Anselm is verbal. Paulo is not summative. Paulo is not shadowy. Paulo is shona. Paulo is not abrupt. Paulo is oversewn. Eloisa is summative. Eloisa is shadowy. Eloisa is shona. Eloisa is not abrupt. Eloisa is oversewn. If something is shona and not nett then it is shadowy. All nett, shadowy things are summative. Furry, abrupt things are shona. All summative things are oversewn. If Anselm is nett then Anselm is abrupt. If Anselm is summative and Anselm is nett then Anselm is oversewn. Anselm is shona.", "logic": "\nSummative(anselm)\nShadowy(anselm)\nNett(anselm)\nOversewn(anselm)\nVerbal(anselm)\nnot Summative(paulo)\nnot Shadowy(paulo)\nShona(paulo)\nnot Abrupt(paulo)\nOversewn(paulo)\nSummative(eloisa)\nShadowy(eloisa)\nShona(eloisa)\nnot Abrupt(eloisa)\nOversewn(eloisa)\nforall x (Shona(x) and not Nett(x) -> Shadowy(x))\nforall x (Nett(x) and Shadowy(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) and Abrupt(x) -> Shona(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Oversewn(x))\nNett(anselm) -> Abrupt(anselm)\nSummative(anselm) and Nett(anselm) -> Oversewn(anselm)\n\nShona(anselm)\n\nNett(anselm) and Nett(anselm) -> Abrupt(anselm) -> therefore Abrupt(anselm) Summative(anselm) and Abrupt(anselm) and forall x (Summative(x) and Abrupt(x) -> Shona(x)) -> therefore Shona(anselm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Goldia is duodecimal. Goldia is loud. Goldia is untapped. Goldia is sixfold. Goldia is topping. Edyth is not duodecimal. Edyth is not loud. Edyth is dedicated. Edyth is not intense. Edyth is sixfold. Vanya is duodecimal. Vanya is loud. Vanya is dedicated. Vanya is not intense. Vanya is sixfold. If something is dedicated and not untapped then it is loud. All untapped, loud things are duodecimal. Furry, intense things are dedicated. All duodecimal things are sixfold. If Goldia is untapped then Goldia is intense. If Goldia is duodecimal and Goldia is untapped then Goldia is sixfold. Goldia is not dedicated.", "logic": "\nDuodecimal(goldia)\nLoud(goldia)\nUntapped(goldia)\nSixfold(goldia)\nTopping(goldia)\nnot Duodecimal(edyth)\nnot Loud(edyth)\nDedicated(edyth)\nnot Intense(edyth)\nSixfold(edyth)\nDuodecimal(vanya)\nLoud(vanya)\nDedicated(vanya)\nnot Intense(vanya)\nSixfold(vanya)\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and not Untapped(x) -> Loud(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) and Loud(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) and Intense(x) -> Dedicated(x))\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> Sixfold(x))\nUntapped(goldia) -> Intense(goldia)\nDuodecimal(goldia) and Untapped(goldia) -> Sixfold(goldia)\n\nnot Dedicated(goldia)\n\nUntapped(goldia) and Untapped(goldia) -> Intense(goldia) -> therefore Intense(goldia) Duodecimal(goldia) and Intense(goldia) and forall x (Duodecimal(x) and Intense(x) -> Dedicated(x)) -> therefore Dedicated(goldia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Tana is concise. Tana is astir. Tana is eristical. Tana is lasting. Tana is empyreal. Faunie is not concise. Faunie is not astir. Faunie is aflutter. Faunie is not expiratory. Faunie is lasting. Alf is concise. Alf is astir. Alf is aflutter. Alf is not expiratory. Alf is lasting. If something is aflutter and not eristical then it is astir. All eristical, astir things are concise. Furry, expiratory things are aflutter. All concise things are lasting. If Tana is eristical then Tana is expiratory. If Tana is concise and Tana is eristical then Tana is lasting. Faunie is not eristical.", "logic": "\nConcise(tana)\nAstir(tana)\nEristical(tana)\nLasting(tana)\nEmpyreal(tana)\nnot Concise(faunie)\nnot Astir(faunie)\nAflutter(faunie)\nnot Expiratory(faunie)\nLasting(faunie)\nConcise(alf)\nAstir(alf)\nAflutter(alf)\nnot Expiratory(alf)\nLasting(alf)\nforall x (Aflutter(x) and not Eristical(x) -> Astir(x))\nforall x (Eristical(x) and Astir(x) -> Concise(x))\nforall x (Concise(x) and Expiratory(x) -> Aflutter(x))\nforall x (Concise(x) -> Lasting(x))\nEristical(tana) -> Expiratory(tana)\nConcise(tana) and Eristical(tana) -> Lasting(tana)\n\nnot Eristical(faunie)\n\nnot Eristical(faunie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Boyd is fifty. Boyd is pluperfect. Boyd is synoicous. Boyd is diametral. Boyd is virtual. Addis is not fifty. Addis is not pluperfect. Addis is afrikaner. Addis is not upbeat. Addis is diametral. Charisse is fifty. Charisse is pluperfect. Charisse is afrikaner. Charisse is not upbeat. Charisse is diametral. If something is afrikaner and not synoicous then it is pluperfect. All synoicous, pluperfect things are fifty. Furry, upbeat things are afrikaner. All fifty things are diametral. If Boyd is synoicous then Boyd is upbeat. If Boyd is fifty and Boyd is synoicous then Boyd is diametral. Charisse is virtual.", "logic": "\nFifty(boyd)\nPluperfect(boyd)\nSynoicous(boyd)\nDiametral(boyd)\nVirtual(boyd)\nnot Fifty(addis)\nnot Pluperfect(addis)\nAfrikaner(addis)\nnot Upbeat(addis)\nDiametral(addis)\nFifty(charisse)\nPluperfect(charisse)\nAfrikaner(charisse)\nnot Upbeat(charisse)\nDiametral(charisse)\nforall x (Afrikaner(x) and not Synoicous(x) -> Pluperfect(x))\nforall x (Synoicous(x) and Pluperfect(x) -> Fifty(x))\nforall x (Fifty(x) and Upbeat(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Fifty(x) -> Diametral(x))\nSynoicous(boyd) -> Upbeat(boyd)\nFifty(boyd) and Synoicous(boyd) -> Diametral(boyd)\n\nVirtual(charisse)\n\nVirtual(charisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Chip is couthie. Chip is taunting. Chip is uncharted. Chip is samoan. Chip is valved. Amanda is not couthie. Amanda is not taunting. Amanda is pianissimo. Amanda is not ailing. Amanda is samoan. Jules is couthie. Jules is taunting. Jules is pianissimo. Jules is not ailing. Jules is samoan. If something is pianissimo and not uncharted then it is taunting. All uncharted, taunting things are couthie. Furry, ailing things are pianissimo. All couthie things are samoan. If Chip is uncharted then Chip is ailing. If Chip is couthie and Chip is uncharted then Chip is samoan. Jules is not uncharted.", "logic": "\nCouthie(chip)\nTaunting(chip)\nUncharted(chip)\nSamoan(chip)\nValved(chip)\nnot Couthie(amanda)\nnot Taunting(amanda)\nPianissimo(amanda)\nnot Ailing(amanda)\nSamoan(amanda)\nCouthie(jules)\nTaunting(jules)\nPianissimo(jules)\nnot Ailing(jules)\nSamoan(jules)\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) and not Uncharted(x) -> Taunting(x))\nforall x (Uncharted(x) and Taunting(x) -> Couthie(x))\nforall x (Couthie(x) and Ailing(x) -> Pianissimo(x))\nforall x (Couthie(x) -> Samoan(x))\nUncharted(chip) -> Ailing(chip)\nCouthie(chip) and Uncharted(chip) -> Samoan(chip)\n\nnot Uncharted(jules)\n\nnot Uncharted(jules) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Hilda is paneled. Hilda is meagerly. Hilda is sublime. Hilda is borated. Hilda is postictal. Lewis is not paneled. Lewis is not meagerly. Lewis is indusial. Lewis is not latest. Lewis is borated. Gerti is paneled. Gerti is meagerly. Gerti is indusial. Gerti is not latest. Gerti is borated. If something is indusial and not sublime then it is meagerly. All sublime, meagerly things are paneled. Furry, latest things are indusial. All paneled things are borated. If Hilda is sublime then Hilda is latest. If Hilda is paneled and Hilda is sublime then Hilda is borated. Lewis is postictal.", "logic": "\nPaneled(hilda)\nMeagerly(hilda)\nSublime(hilda)\nBorated(hilda)\nPostictal(hilda)\nnot Paneled(lewis)\nnot Meagerly(lewis)\nIndusial(lewis)\nnot Latest(lewis)\nBorated(lewis)\nPaneled(gerti)\nMeagerly(gerti)\nIndusial(gerti)\nnot Latest(gerti)\nBorated(gerti)\nforall x (Indusial(x) and not Sublime(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Sublime(x) and Meagerly(x) -> Paneled(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) and Latest(x) -> Indusial(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Borated(x))\nSublime(hilda) -> Latest(hilda)\nPaneled(hilda) and Sublime(hilda) -> Borated(hilda)\n\nPostictal(lewis)\n\nPostictal(lewis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-222"} {"premises": "Kissee is rejective. Kissee is thracian. Kissee is unthinking. Kissee is overeager. Cortney is rejective. Cortney is thracian. Cortney is delayed. Spenser is not unthinking. Spenser is overeager. Spenser is delayed. If something is unthinking then it is thracian. Smart, delayed things are indicatory. If Spenser is rejective then Spenser is delayed. If something is rejective and indicatory then it is not xxix. If Spenser is rejective then Spenser is thracian. Big things are unthinking. Spenser is not unthinking.", "logic": "\nRejective(kissee)\nThracian(kissee)\nUnthinking(kissee)\nOvereager(kissee)\nRejective(cortney)\nThracian(cortney)\nDelayed(cortney)\nnot Unthinking(spenser)\nOvereager(spenser)\nDelayed(spenser)\nforall x (Unthinking(x) -> Thracian(x))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) and Delayed(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nRejective(spenser) -> Delayed(spenser)\nforall x (Rejective(x) and Indicatory(x) -> not Xxix(x))\nRejective(spenser) -> Thracian(spenser)\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Unthinking(x))\n\nnot Unthinking(spenser)\n\ntherefore not Unthinking(spenser)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Bradly is hempen. Bradly is sterile. Bradly is oversexed. Bradly is windless. Henderson is hempen. Henderson is sterile. Henderson is philippine. Darda is not oversexed. Darda is windless. Darda is philippine. If something is oversexed then it is sterile. Smart, philippine things are ergotropic. If Darda is hempen then Darda is philippine. If something is hempen and ergotropic then it is not airheaded. If Darda is hempen then Darda is sterile. Big things are oversexed. Bradly is not sterile.", "logic": "\nHempen(bradly)\nSterile(bradly)\nOversexed(bradly)\nWindless(bradly)\nHempen(henderson)\nSterile(henderson)\nPhilippine(henderson)\nnot Oversexed(darda)\nWindless(darda)\nPhilippine(darda)\nforall x (Oversexed(x) -> Sterile(x))\nforall x (Oversexed(x) and Philippine(x) -> Ergotropic(x))\nHempen(darda) -> Philippine(darda)\nforall x (Hempen(x) and Ergotropic(x) -> not Airheaded(x))\nHempen(darda) -> Sterile(darda)\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Oversexed(x))\n\nnot Sterile(bradly)\n\ntherefore Sterile(bradly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Chrissy is dispirited. Chrissy is defective. Chrissy is extended. Chrissy is hebraic. Vladimir is dispirited. Vladimir is defective. Vladimir is unalloyed. Marten is not extended. Marten is hebraic. Marten is unalloyed. If something is extended then it is defective. Smart, unalloyed things are ramous. If Marten is dispirited then Marten is unalloyed. If something is dispirited and ramous then it is not harmonical. If Marten is dispirited then Marten is defective. Big things are extended. Vladimir is extended.", "logic": "\nDispirited(chrissy)\nDefective(chrissy)\nExtended(chrissy)\nHebraic(chrissy)\nDispirited(vladimir)\nDefective(vladimir)\nUnalloyed(vladimir)\nnot Extended(marten)\nHebraic(marten)\nUnalloyed(marten)\nforall x (Extended(x) -> Defective(x))\nforall x (Extended(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> Ramous(x))\nDispirited(marten) -> Unalloyed(marten)\nforall x (Dispirited(x) and Ramous(x) -> not Harmonical(x))\nDispirited(marten) -> Defective(marten)\nforall x (Dispirited(x) -> Extended(x))\n\nExtended(vladimir)\n\nDispirited(vladimir) and forall x (Dispirited(x) -> Extended(x)) -> therefore Extended(vladimir)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Mariana is feminine. Mariana is hatted. Mariana is campy. Mariana is toughened. Moreen is feminine. Moreen is hatted. Moreen is praiseful. Allison is not campy. Allison is toughened. Allison is praiseful. If something is campy then it is hatted. Smart, praiseful things are cyanogenic. If Allison is feminine then Allison is praiseful. If something is feminine and cyanogenic then it is not paying. If Allison is feminine then Allison is hatted. Big things are campy. Moreen is not campy.", "logic": "\nFeminine(mariana)\nHatted(mariana)\nCampy(mariana)\nToughened(mariana)\nFeminine(moreen)\nHatted(moreen)\nPraiseful(moreen)\nnot Campy(allison)\nToughened(allison)\nPraiseful(allison)\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) and Praiseful(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nFeminine(allison) -> Praiseful(allison)\nforall x (Feminine(x) and Cyanogenic(x) -> not Paying(x))\nFeminine(allison) -> Hatted(allison)\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Campy(x))\n\nnot Campy(moreen)\n\nFeminine(moreen) and forall x (Feminine(x) -> Campy(x)) -> therefore Campy(moreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Lucille is bighearted. Lucille is boxy. Lucille is cornish. Lucille is fijian. Joycelin is bighearted. Joycelin is boxy. Joycelin is torn. Salem is not cornish. Salem is fijian. Salem is torn. If something is cornish then it is boxy. Smart, torn things are metastable. If Salem is bighearted then Salem is torn. If something is bighearted and metastable then it is not speckled. If Salem is bighearted then Salem is boxy. Big things are cornish. Joycelin is metastable.", "logic": "\nBighearted(lucille)\nBoxy(lucille)\nCornish(lucille)\nFijian(lucille)\nBighearted(joycelin)\nBoxy(joycelin)\nTorn(joycelin)\nnot Cornish(salem)\nFijian(salem)\nTorn(salem)\nforall x (Cornish(x) -> Boxy(x))\nforall x (Cornish(x) and Torn(x) -> Metastable(x))\nBighearted(salem) -> Torn(salem)\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Metastable(x) -> not Speckled(x))\nBighearted(salem) -> Boxy(salem)\nforall x (Bighearted(x) -> Cornish(x))\n\nMetastable(joycelin)\n\nBighearted(joycelin) and forall x (Bighearted(x) -> Cornish(x)) -> therefore Cornish(joycelin) Cornish(joycelin) and Torn(joycelin) and forall x (Cornish(x) and Torn(x) -> Metastable(x)) -> therefore Metastable(joycelin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Robinson is temperate. Robinson is referenced. Robinson is chylaceous. Robinson is pasty. Donni is temperate. Donni is referenced. Donni is provident. Gracie is not chylaceous. Gracie is pasty. Gracie is provident. If something is chylaceous then it is referenced. Smart, provident things are dipped. If Gracie is temperate then Gracie is provident. If something is temperate and dipped then it is not filmable. If Gracie is temperate then Gracie is referenced. Big things are chylaceous. Donni is not dipped.", "logic": "\nTemperate(robinson)\nReferenced(robinson)\nChylaceous(robinson)\nPasty(robinson)\nTemperate(donni)\nReferenced(donni)\nProvident(donni)\nnot Chylaceous(gracie)\nPasty(gracie)\nProvident(gracie)\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) -> Referenced(x))\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) and Provident(x) -> Dipped(x))\nTemperate(gracie) -> Provident(gracie)\nforall x (Temperate(x) and Dipped(x) -> not Filmable(x))\nTemperate(gracie) -> Referenced(gracie)\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Chylaceous(x))\n\nnot Dipped(donni)\n\nTemperate(donni) and forall x (Temperate(x) -> Chylaceous(x)) -> therefore Chylaceous(donni) Chylaceous(donni) and Provident(donni) and forall x (Chylaceous(x) and Provident(x) -> Dipped(x)) -> therefore Dipped(donni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Alissa is gradatory. Alissa is drudging. Alissa is mesozoic. Alissa is attached. Judi is gradatory. Judi is drudging. Judi is thousand. Sullivan is not mesozoic. Sullivan is attached. Sullivan is thousand. If something is mesozoic then it is drudging. Smart, thousand things are disgustful. If Sullivan is gradatory then Sullivan is thousand. If something is gradatory and disgustful then it is not washed. If Sullivan is gradatory then Sullivan is drudging. Big things are mesozoic. Alissa is not disgustful.", "logic": "\nGradatory(alissa)\nDrudging(alissa)\nMesozoic(alissa)\nAttached(alissa)\nGradatory(judi)\nDrudging(judi)\nThousand(judi)\nnot Mesozoic(sullivan)\nAttached(sullivan)\nThousand(sullivan)\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Drudging(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) and Thousand(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nGradatory(sullivan) -> Thousand(sullivan)\nforall x (Gradatory(x) and Disgustful(x) -> not Washed(x))\nGradatory(sullivan) -> Drudging(sullivan)\nforall x (Gradatory(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\n\nnot Disgustful(alissa)\n\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) and Thousand(x) -> Disgustful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Margy is geographic. Margy is cordate. Margy is bicornate. Margy is acrobatic. Cyrus is geographic. Cyrus is cordate. Cyrus is noticed. Jason is not bicornate. Jason is acrobatic. Jason is noticed. If something is bicornate then it is cordate. Smart, noticed things are stock. If Jason is geographic then Jason is noticed. If something is geographic and stock then it is not womanish. If Jason is geographic then Jason is cordate. Big things are bicornate. Jason is stock.", "logic": "\nGeographic(margy)\nCordate(margy)\nBicornate(margy)\nAcrobatic(margy)\nGeographic(cyrus)\nCordate(cyrus)\nNoticed(cyrus)\nnot Bicornate(jason)\nAcrobatic(jason)\nNoticed(jason)\nforall x (Bicornate(x) -> Cordate(x))\nforall x (Bicornate(x) and Noticed(x) -> Stock(x))\nGeographic(jason) -> Noticed(jason)\nforall x (Geographic(x) and Stock(x) -> not Womanish(x))\nGeographic(jason) -> Cordate(jason)\nforall x (Geographic(x) -> Bicornate(x))\n\nStock(jason)\n\nforall x (Bicornate(x) and Noticed(x) -> Stock(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Ursuline is elevated. Ursuline is zonal. Ursuline is untitled. Ursuline is dulled. Micah is elevated. Micah is zonal. Micah is adept. Darwin is not untitled. Darwin is dulled. Darwin is adept. If something is untitled then it is zonal. Smart, adept things are advisory. If Darwin is elevated then Darwin is adept. If something is elevated and advisory then it is not enjoyable. If Darwin is elevated then Darwin is zonal. Big things are untitled. Darwin is not zonal.", "logic": "\nElevated(ursuline)\nZonal(ursuline)\nUntitled(ursuline)\nDulled(ursuline)\nElevated(micah)\nZonal(micah)\nAdept(micah)\nnot Untitled(darwin)\nDulled(darwin)\nAdept(darwin)\nforall x (Untitled(x) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Untitled(x) and Adept(x) -> Advisory(x))\nElevated(darwin) -> Adept(darwin)\nforall x (Elevated(x) and Advisory(x) -> not Enjoyable(x))\nElevated(darwin) -> Zonal(darwin)\nforall x (Elevated(x) -> Untitled(x))\n\nnot Zonal(darwin)\n\nforall x (Untitled(x) -> Zonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Breena is lowly. Breena is exact. Breena is subject. Breena is capital. Laurie is lowly. Laurie is exact. Laurie is fisheye. Isabeau is not subject. Isabeau is capital. Isabeau is fisheye. If something is subject then it is exact. Smart, fisheye things are storeyed. If Isabeau is lowly then Isabeau is fisheye. If something is lowly and storeyed then it is not extricable. If Isabeau is lowly then Isabeau is exact. Big things are subject. Laurie is capital.", "logic": "\nLowly(breena)\nExact(breena)\nSubject(breena)\nCapital(breena)\nLowly(laurie)\nExact(laurie)\nFisheye(laurie)\nnot Subject(isabeau)\nCapital(isabeau)\nFisheye(isabeau)\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Exact(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) and Fisheye(x) -> Storeyed(x))\nLowly(isabeau) -> Fisheye(isabeau)\nforall x (Lowly(x) and Storeyed(x) -> not Extricable(x))\nLowly(isabeau) -> Exact(isabeau)\nforall x (Lowly(x) -> Subject(x))\n\nCapital(laurie)\n\nCapital(laurie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Doria is centralist. Doria is unlawful. Doria is flowerless. Doria is ariose. Colene is centralist. Colene is unlawful. Colene is avoidable. Constance is not flowerless. Constance is ariose. Constance is avoidable. If something is flowerless then it is unlawful. Smart, avoidable things are virile. If Constance is centralist then Constance is avoidable. If something is centralist and virile then it is not panoptic. If Constance is centralist then Constance is unlawful. Big things are flowerless. Constance is not panoptic.", "logic": "\nCentralist(doria)\nUnlawful(doria)\nFlowerless(doria)\nAriose(doria)\nCentralist(colene)\nUnlawful(colene)\nAvoidable(colene)\nnot Flowerless(constance)\nAriose(constance)\nAvoidable(constance)\nforall x (Flowerless(x) -> Unlawful(x))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) and Avoidable(x) -> Virile(x))\nCentralist(constance) -> Avoidable(constance)\nforall x (Centralist(x) and Virile(x) -> not Panoptic(x))\nCentralist(constance) -> Unlawful(constance)\nforall x (Centralist(x) -> Flowerless(x))\n\nnot Panoptic(constance)\n\nnot Panoptic(constance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Charmaine is xanthous. Charmaine is crippled. Charmaine is taloned. Charmaine is ossiferous. Frazier is xanthous. Frazier is crippled. Frazier is acroscopic. Consolata is not taloned. Consolata is ossiferous. Consolata is acroscopic. If something is taloned then it is crippled. Smart, acroscopic things are brash. If Consolata is xanthous then Consolata is acroscopic. If something is xanthous and brash then it is not addictive. If Consolata is xanthous then Consolata is crippled. Big things are taloned. Charmaine is addictive.", "logic": "\nXanthous(charmaine)\nCrippled(charmaine)\nTaloned(charmaine)\nOssiferous(charmaine)\nXanthous(frazier)\nCrippled(frazier)\nAcroscopic(frazier)\nnot Taloned(consolata)\nOssiferous(consolata)\nAcroscopic(consolata)\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> Crippled(x))\nforall x (Taloned(x) and Acroscopic(x) -> Brash(x))\nXanthous(consolata) -> Acroscopic(consolata)\nforall x (Xanthous(x) and Brash(x) -> not Addictive(x))\nXanthous(consolata) -> Crippled(consolata)\nforall x (Xanthous(x) -> Taloned(x))\n\nAddictive(charmaine)\n\nAddictive(charmaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1873"} {"premises": "Erinna is fascistic. Ari is latter. All mourning people are irate. Round people are mourning. Erinna is fascistic.", "logic": "\nFascistic(erinna)\nLatter(ari)\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Irate(x))\nforall x (Latter(x) -> Mourning(x))\n\nFascistic(erinna)\n\ntherefore Fascistic(erinna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Amelia is unfeigned. Izak is rescued. All myelic people are slurred. Round people are myelic. Izak is not rescued.", "logic": "\nUnfeigned(amelia)\nRescued(izak)\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Slurred(x))\nforall x (Rescued(x) -> Myelic(x))\n\nnot Rescued(izak)\n\ntherefore Rescued(izak)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Phillipe is germicidal. Francisca is salmon. All suave people are zestful. Round people are suave. Francisca is suave.", "logic": "\nGermicidal(phillipe)\nSalmon(francisca)\nforall x (Suave(x) -> Zestful(x))\nforall x (Salmon(x) -> Suave(x))\n\nSuave(francisca)\n\nSalmon(francisca) and forall x (Salmon(x) -> Suave(x)) -> therefore Suave(francisca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Lamar is toroidal. Sophie is pancreatic. All unadvised people are probing. Round people are unadvised. Sophie is not unadvised.", "logic": "\nToroidal(lamar)\nPancreatic(sophie)\nforall x (Unadvised(x) -> Probing(x))\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Unadvised(x))\n\nnot Unadvised(sophie)\n\nPancreatic(sophie) and forall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Unadvised(x)) -> therefore Unadvised(sophie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Thatch is bovid. Orson is chinchy. All axile people are republican. Round people are axile. Orson is republican.", "logic": "\nBovid(thatch)\nChinchy(orson)\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Axile(x))\n\nRepublican(orson)\n\nChinchy(orson) and forall x (Chinchy(x) -> Axile(x)) -> therefore Axile(orson) Axile(orson) and forall x (Axile(x) -> Republican(x)) -> therefore Republican(orson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Katheleen is inconstant. Jorge is hyperopic. All bankrupt people are censorious. Round people are bankrupt. Jorge is not censorious.", "logic": "\nInconstant(katheleen)\nHyperopic(jorge)\nforall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Hyperopic(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\n\nnot Censorious(jorge)\n\nHyperopic(jorge) and forall x (Hyperopic(x) -> Bankrupt(x)) -> therefore Bankrupt(jorge) Bankrupt(jorge) and forall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Censorious(x)) -> therefore Censorious(jorge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Benson is slashing. Marcio is dormy. All sentential people are second. Round people are sentential. Benson is not second.", "logic": "\nSlashing(benson)\nDormy(marcio)\nforall x (Sentential(x) -> Second(x))\nforall x (Dormy(x) -> Sentential(x))\n\nnot Second(benson)\n\nforall x (Sentential(x) -> Second(x)) <- forall x (Dormy(x) -> Sentential(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Elie is clayey. Brita is wifelike. All antitrust people are aoristic. Round people are antitrust. Elie is antitrust.", "logic": "\nClayey(elie)\nWifelike(brita)\nforall x (Antitrust(x) -> Aoristic(x))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Antitrust(x))\n\nAntitrust(elie)\n\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Antitrust(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Valida is capacious. Emelia is dickey. All delicious people are botryoid. Round people are delicious. Emelia is not white.", "logic": "\nCapacious(valida)\nDickey(emelia)\nforall x (Delicious(x) -> Botryoid(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) -> Delicious(x))\n\nnot White(emelia)\n\nnot White(emelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Thornie is unadjusted. Dmitri is untoasted. All creedal people are comparable. Round people are creedal. Dmitri is unadjusted.", "logic": "\nUnadjusted(thornie)\nUntoasted(dmitri)\nforall x (Creedal(x) -> Comparable(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) -> Creedal(x))\n\nUnadjusted(dmitri)\n\nUnadjusted(dmitri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Dionne is port. Merrie is retrograde. All wizened people are shoaly. Round people are wizened. Dionne is not white.", "logic": "\nPort(dionne)\nRetrograde(merrie)\nforall x (Wizened(x) -> Shoaly(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) -> Wizened(x))\n\nnot White(dionne)\n\nnot White(dionne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Mireielle is nominative. Barnard is prefrontal. All reigning people are unkindled. Round people are reigning. Mireielle is prefrontal.", "logic": "\nNominative(mireielle)\nPrefrontal(barnard)\nforall x (Reigning(x) -> Unkindled(x))\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) -> Reigning(x))\n\nPrefrontal(mireielle)\n\nPrefrontal(mireielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Bertram is smoothed. Bertram is inherited. Bertram is juridic. Bertram is sapphic. Halley is tangential. Halley is smoothed. Halley is juridic. Halley is sapphic. Halley is wellborn. Halley is intriguing. All sapphic, wellborn people are inherited. If Halley is intriguing then Halley is tangential. If someone is wellborn and smoothed then they are tangential. If someone is sapphic and inherited then they are wellborn. If Halley is smoothed then Halley is sapphic. All intriguing people are juridic. White people are sapphic. If Halley is juridic and Halley is tangential then Halley is smoothed. Bertram is smoothed.", "logic": "\nSmoothed(bertram)\nInherited(bertram)\nJuridic(bertram)\nSapphic(bertram)\nTangential(halley)\nSmoothed(halley)\nJuridic(halley)\nSapphic(halley)\nWellborn(halley)\nIntriguing(halley)\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Wellborn(x) -> Inherited(x))\nIntriguing(halley) -> Tangential(halley)\nforall x (Wellborn(x) and Smoothed(x) -> Tangential(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) and Inherited(x) -> Wellborn(x))\nSmoothed(halley) -> Sapphic(halley)\nforall x (Intriguing(x) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Wellborn(x) -> Sapphic(x))\nJuridic(halley) and Tangential(halley) -> Smoothed(halley)\n\nSmoothed(bertram)\n\ntherefore Smoothed(bertram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "Benjamen is visible. Benjamen is actuarial. Benjamen is aeonian. Benjamen is untempered. Malka is motored. Malka is visible. Malka is aeonian. Malka is untempered. Malka is figural. Malka is undirected. All untempered, figural people are actuarial. If Malka is undirected then Malka is motored. If someone is figural and visible then they are motored. If someone is untempered and actuarial then they are figural. If Malka is visible then Malka is untempered. All undirected people are aeonian. White people are untempered. If Malka is aeonian and Malka is motored then Malka is visible. Benjamen is not aeonian.", "logic": "\nVisible(benjamen)\nActuarial(benjamen)\nAeonian(benjamen)\nUntempered(benjamen)\nMotored(malka)\nVisible(malka)\nAeonian(malka)\nUntempered(malka)\nFigural(malka)\nUndirected(malka)\nforall x (Untempered(x) and Figural(x) -> Actuarial(x))\nUndirected(malka) -> Motored(malka)\nforall x (Figural(x) and Visible(x) -> Motored(x))\nforall x (Untempered(x) and Actuarial(x) -> Figural(x))\nVisible(malka) -> Untempered(malka)\nforall x (Undirected(x) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Untempered(x))\nAeonian(malka) and Motored(malka) -> Visible(malka)\n\nnot Aeonian(benjamen)\n\ntherefore Aeonian(benjamen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "Andra is immune. Andra is daredevil. Andra is surficial. Andra is courtly. Mada is bladdery. Mada is immune. Mada is surficial. Mada is courtly. Mada is pyrogenic. Mada is rich. All courtly, pyrogenic people are daredevil. If Mada is rich then Mada is bladdery. If someone is pyrogenic and immune then they are bladdery. If someone is courtly and daredevil then they are pyrogenic. If Mada is immune then Mada is courtly. All rich people are surficial. White people are courtly. If Mada is surficial and Mada is bladdery then Mada is immune. Andra is pyrogenic.", "logic": "\nImmune(andra)\nDaredevil(andra)\nSurficial(andra)\nCourtly(andra)\nBladdery(mada)\nImmune(mada)\nSurficial(mada)\nCourtly(mada)\nPyrogenic(mada)\nRich(mada)\nforall x (Courtly(x) and Pyrogenic(x) -> Daredevil(x))\nRich(mada) -> Bladdery(mada)\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) and Immune(x) -> Bladdery(x))\nforall x (Courtly(x) and Daredevil(x) -> Pyrogenic(x))\nImmune(mada) -> Courtly(mada)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Surficial(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) -> Courtly(x))\nSurficial(mada) and Bladdery(mada) -> Immune(mada)\n\nPyrogenic(andra)\n\nCourtly(andra) and Daredevil(andra) and forall x (Courtly(x) and Daredevil(x) -> Pyrogenic(x)) -> therefore Pyrogenic(andra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "Carmon is abstemious. Carmon is thorough. Carmon is hypodermal. Carmon is gonadal. Idette is editorial. Idette is abstemious. Idette is hypodermal. Idette is gonadal. Idette is viewable. Idette is romansh. All gonadal, viewable people are thorough. If Idette is romansh then Idette is editorial. If someone is viewable and abstemious then they are editorial. If someone is gonadal and thorough then they are viewable. If Idette is abstemious then Idette is gonadal. All romansh people are hypodermal. White people are gonadal. If Idette is hypodermal and Idette is editorial then Idette is abstemious. Idette is not thorough.", "logic": "\nAbstemious(carmon)\nThorough(carmon)\nHypodermal(carmon)\nGonadal(carmon)\nEditorial(idette)\nAbstemious(idette)\nHypodermal(idette)\nGonadal(idette)\nViewable(idette)\nRomansh(idette)\nforall x (Gonadal(x) and Viewable(x) -> Thorough(x))\nRomansh(idette) -> Editorial(idette)\nforall x (Viewable(x) and Abstemious(x) -> Editorial(x))\nforall x (Gonadal(x) and Thorough(x) -> Viewable(x))\nAbstemious(idette) -> Gonadal(idette)\nforall x (Romansh(x) -> Hypodermal(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) -> Gonadal(x))\nHypodermal(idette) and Editorial(idette) -> Abstemious(idette)\n\nnot Thorough(idette)\n\nGonadal(idette) and Viewable(idette) and forall x (Gonadal(x) and Viewable(x) -> Thorough(x)) -> therefore Thorough(idette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "Kimball is dampish. Kimball is jubilant. Kimball is bibliotic. Kimball is unshelled. Garrott is prakritic. Garrott is dampish. Garrott is bibliotic. Garrott is unshelled. Garrott is euclidean. Garrott is bunchy. All unshelled, euclidean people are jubilant. If Garrott is bunchy then Garrott is prakritic. If someone is euclidean and dampish then they are prakritic. If someone is unshelled and jubilant then they are euclidean. If Garrott is dampish then Garrott is unshelled. All bunchy people are bibliotic. White people are unshelled. If Garrott is bibliotic and Garrott is prakritic then Garrott is dampish. Kimball is prakritic.", "logic": "\nDampish(kimball)\nJubilant(kimball)\nBibliotic(kimball)\nUnshelled(kimball)\nPrakritic(garrott)\nDampish(garrott)\nBibliotic(garrott)\nUnshelled(garrott)\nEuclidean(garrott)\nBunchy(garrott)\nforall x (Unshelled(x) and Euclidean(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nBunchy(garrott) -> Prakritic(garrott)\nforall x (Euclidean(x) and Dampish(x) -> Prakritic(x))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) and Jubilant(x) -> Euclidean(x))\nDampish(garrott) -> Unshelled(garrott)\nforall x (Bunchy(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Euclidean(x) -> Unshelled(x))\nBibliotic(garrott) and Prakritic(garrott) -> Dampish(garrott)\n\nPrakritic(kimball)\n\nUnshelled(kimball) and Jubilant(kimball) and forall x (Unshelled(x) and Jubilant(x) -> Euclidean(x)) -> therefore Euclidean(kimball) Euclidean(kimball) and Dampish(kimball) and forall x (Euclidean(x) and Dampish(x) -> Prakritic(x)) -> therefore Prakritic(kimball)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "Simone is pressed. Simone is winding. Simone is hypothetic. Simone is prankish. Nydia is beautiful. Nydia is pressed. Nydia is hypothetic. Nydia is prankish. Nydia is tumid. Nydia is airy. All prankish, tumid people are winding. If Nydia is airy then Nydia is beautiful. If someone is tumid and pressed then they are beautiful. If someone is prankish and winding then they are tumid. If Nydia is pressed then Nydia is prankish. All airy people are hypothetic. White people are prankish. If Nydia is hypothetic and Nydia is beautiful then Nydia is pressed. Simone is not beautiful.", "logic": "\nPressed(simone)\nWinding(simone)\nHypothetic(simone)\nPrankish(simone)\nBeautiful(nydia)\nPressed(nydia)\nHypothetic(nydia)\nPrankish(nydia)\nTumid(nydia)\nAiry(nydia)\nforall x (Prankish(x) and Tumid(x) -> Winding(x))\nAiry(nydia) -> Beautiful(nydia)\nforall x (Tumid(x) and Pressed(x) -> Beautiful(x))\nforall x (Prankish(x) and Winding(x) -> Tumid(x))\nPressed(nydia) -> Prankish(nydia)\nforall x (Airy(x) -> Hypothetic(x))\nforall x (Tumid(x) -> Prankish(x))\nHypothetic(nydia) and Beautiful(nydia) -> Pressed(nydia)\n\nnot Beautiful(simone)\n\nPrankish(simone) and Winding(simone) and forall x (Prankish(x) and Winding(x) -> Tumid(x)) -> therefore Tumid(simone) Tumid(simone) and Pressed(simone) and forall x (Tumid(x) and Pressed(x) -> Beautiful(x)) -> therefore Beautiful(simone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The lucinda buss the buddy. The lucinda surfeit the rosamund. The lucinda is bushy. The lucinda is adjacent. The lucinda compose the rosamund. The buddy buss the lucinda. The buddy is hepatic. The buddy compose the lucinda. The buddy compose the rosamund. The rosamund compose the buddy. If someone surfeit the rosamund then the rosamund is sedate. If someone is sedate then they chase the lucinda. The lucinda compose the rosamund.", "logic": "\nBuss(lucinda, buddy)\nSurfeit(lucinda, rosamund)\nBushy(lucinda)\nAdjacent(lucinda)\nCompose(lucinda, rosamund)\nBuss(buddy, lucinda)\nHepatic(buddy)\nCompose(buddy, lucinda)\nCompose(buddy, rosamund)\nCompose(rosamund, buddy)\nforall x (Surfeit(x, rosamund) -> Sedate(rosamund))\nforall x (Sedate(x) -> Buss(x, lucinda))\n\nCompose(lucinda, rosamund)\n\ntherefore Compose(lucinda, rosamund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The dolly qualify the correna. The dolly fume the shayna. The dolly is mixed. The dolly is redundant. The dolly catechize the shayna. The correna qualify the dolly. The correna is tuppeny. The correna catechize the dolly. The correna catechize the shayna. The shayna catechize the correna. If someone fume the shayna then the shayna is stainable. If someone is stainable then they chase the dolly. The dolly does not chase the correna.", "logic": "\nQualify(dolly, correna)\nFume(dolly, shayna)\nMixed(dolly)\nRedundant(dolly)\nCatechize(dolly, shayna)\nQualify(correna, dolly)\nTuppeny(correna)\nCatechize(correna, dolly)\nCatechize(correna, shayna)\nCatechize(shayna, correna)\nforall x (Fume(x, shayna) -> Stainable(shayna))\nforall x (Stainable(x) -> Qualify(x, dolly))\n\nnot Qualify(dolly, correna)\n\ntherefore Qualify(dolly, correna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The ulrika shag the lynne. The ulrika withstand the cornelia. The ulrika is autogamous. The ulrika is abnaki. The ulrika flog the cornelia. The lynne shag the ulrika. The lynne is doped. The lynne flog the ulrika. The lynne flog the cornelia. The cornelia flog the lynne. If someone withstand the cornelia then the cornelia is queenlike. If someone is queenlike then they chase the ulrika. The cornelia is queenlike.", "logic": "\nShag(ulrika, lynne)\nWithstand(ulrika, cornelia)\nAutogamous(ulrika)\nAbnaki(ulrika)\nFlog(ulrika, cornelia)\nShag(lynne, ulrika)\nDoped(lynne)\nFlog(lynne, ulrika)\nFlog(lynne, cornelia)\nFlog(cornelia, lynne)\nforall x (Withstand(x, cornelia) -> Queenlike(cornelia))\nforall x (Queenlike(x) -> Shag(x, ulrika))\n\nQueenlike(cornelia)\n\nWithstand(ulrika, cornelia) and forall x (Withstand(x, cornelia) -> Queenlike(cornelia)) -> therefore Queenlike(cornelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The rae redress the jobey. The rae vindicate the sacha. The rae is needed. The rae is anabolic. The rae spirit the sacha. The jobey redress the rae. The jobey is calvinist. The jobey spirit the rae. The jobey spirit the sacha. The sacha spirit the jobey. If someone vindicate the sacha then the sacha is appendaged. If someone is appendaged then they chase the rae. The sacha is not appendaged.", "logic": "\nRedress(rae, jobey)\nVindicate(rae, sacha)\nNeeded(rae)\nAnabolic(rae)\nSpirit(rae, sacha)\nRedress(jobey, rae)\nCalvinist(jobey)\nSpirit(jobey, rae)\nSpirit(jobey, sacha)\nSpirit(sacha, jobey)\nforall x (Vindicate(x, sacha) -> Appendaged(sacha))\nforall x (Appendaged(x) -> Redress(x, rae))\n\nnot Appendaged(sacha)\n\nVindicate(rae, sacha) and forall x (Vindicate(x, sacha) -> Appendaged(sacha)) -> therefore Appendaged(sacha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The gray culture the bill. The gray opalize the tracy. The gray is spotty. The gray is cruddy. The gray undersell the tracy. The bill culture the gray. The bill is expert. The bill undersell the gray. The bill undersell the tracy. The tracy undersell the bill. If someone opalize the tracy then the tracy is customary. If someone is customary then they chase the gray. The tracy culture the gray.", "logic": "\nCulture(gray, bill)\nOpalize(gray, tracy)\nSpotty(gray)\nCruddy(gray)\nUndersell(gray, tracy)\nCulture(bill, gray)\nExpert(bill)\nUndersell(bill, gray)\nUndersell(bill, tracy)\nUndersell(tracy, bill)\nforall x (Opalize(x, tracy) -> Customary(tracy))\nforall x (Customary(x) -> Culture(x, gray))\n\nCulture(tracy, gray)\n\nOpalize(gray, tracy) and forall x (Opalize(x, tracy) -> Customary(tracy)) -> therefore Customary(tracy) Customary(tracy) and forall x (Customary(x) -> Culture(x, gray)) -> therefore Culture(tracy, gray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The cloe prevent the karrie. The cloe strop the mandy. The cloe is seventeen. The cloe is aculeated. The cloe glaciate the mandy. The karrie prevent the cloe. The karrie is pugilistic. The karrie glaciate the cloe. The karrie glaciate the mandy. The mandy glaciate the karrie. If someone strop the mandy then the mandy is nepali. If someone is nepali then they chase the cloe. The mandy does not chase the cloe.", "logic": "\nPrevent(cloe, karrie)\nStrop(cloe, mandy)\nSeventeen(cloe)\nAculeated(cloe)\nGlaciate(cloe, mandy)\nPrevent(karrie, cloe)\nPugilistic(karrie)\nGlaciate(karrie, cloe)\nGlaciate(karrie, mandy)\nGlaciate(mandy, karrie)\nforall x (Strop(x, mandy) -> Nepali(mandy))\nforall x (Nepali(x) -> Prevent(x, cloe))\n\nnot Prevent(mandy, cloe)\n\nStrop(cloe, mandy) and forall x (Strop(x, mandy) -> Nepali(mandy)) -> therefore Nepali(mandy) Nepali(mandy) and forall x (Nepali(x) -> Prevent(x, cloe)) -> therefore Prevent(mandy, cloe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The ely ejaculate the felicia. The ely hearten the haydon. The ely is treasonous. The ely is ectozoan. The ely previse the haydon. The felicia ejaculate the ely. The felicia is plumaged. The felicia previse the ely. The felicia previse the haydon. The haydon previse the felicia. If someone hearten the haydon then the haydon is biogenous. If someone is biogenous then they chase the ely. The ely does not chase the ely.", "logic": "\nEjaculate(ely, felicia)\nHearten(ely, haydon)\nTreasonous(ely)\nEctozoan(ely)\nPrevise(ely, haydon)\nEjaculate(felicia, ely)\nPlumaged(felicia)\nPrevise(felicia, ely)\nPrevise(felicia, haydon)\nPrevise(haydon, felicia)\nforall x (Hearten(x, haydon) -> Biogenous(haydon))\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Ejaculate(x, ely))\n\nnot Ejaculate(ely, ely)\n\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Ejaculate(x, ely)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The bertrand dangle the cosmo. The bertrand indurate the dea. The bertrand is cesarian. The bertrand is sophomore. The bertrand opsonize the dea. The cosmo dangle the bertrand. The cosmo is strangled. The cosmo opsonize the bertrand. The cosmo opsonize the dea. The dea opsonize the cosmo. If someone indurate the dea then the dea is lost. If someone is lost then they chase the bertrand. The dea dangle the dea.", "logic": "\nDangle(bertrand, cosmo)\nIndurate(bertrand, dea)\nCesarian(bertrand)\nSophomore(bertrand)\nOpsonize(bertrand, dea)\nDangle(cosmo, bertrand)\nStrangled(cosmo)\nOpsonize(cosmo, bertrand)\nOpsonize(cosmo, dea)\nOpsonize(dea, cosmo)\nforall x (Indurate(x, dea) -> Lost(dea))\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Dangle(x, bertrand))\n\nDangle(dea, dea)\n\nDangle(dea, dea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The nikolai range the wendy. The nikolai provoke the jeremy. The nikolai is gardant. The nikolai is rummy. The nikolai cloy the jeremy. The wendy range the nikolai. The wendy is hawaiian. The wendy cloy the nikolai. The wendy cloy the jeremy. The jeremy cloy the wendy. If someone provoke the jeremy then the jeremy is slight. If someone is slight then they chase the nikolai. The jeremy does not chase the wendy.", "logic": "\nRange(nikolai, wendy)\nProvoke(nikolai, jeremy)\nGardant(nikolai)\nRummy(nikolai)\nCloy(nikolai, jeremy)\nRange(wendy, nikolai)\nHawaiian(wendy)\nCloy(wendy, nikolai)\nCloy(wendy, jeremy)\nCloy(jeremy, wendy)\nforall x (Provoke(x, jeremy) -> Slight(jeremy))\nforall x (Slight(x) -> Range(x, nikolai))\n\nnot Range(jeremy, wendy)\n\nnot Range(jeremy, wendy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The marshall hamstring the dina. The marshall formalise the ilyssa. The marshall is assaultive. The marshall is jihadi. The marshall cipher the ilyssa. The dina hamstring the marshall. The dina is ovarian. The dina cipher the marshall. The dina cipher the ilyssa. The ilyssa cipher the dina. If someone formalise the ilyssa then the ilyssa is ungroomed. If someone is ungroomed then they chase the marshall. The marshall is big.", "logic": "\nHamstring(marshall, dina)\nFormalise(marshall, ilyssa)\nAssaultive(marshall)\nJihadi(marshall)\nCipher(marshall, ilyssa)\nHamstring(dina, marshall)\nOvarian(dina)\nCipher(dina, marshall)\nCipher(dina, ilyssa)\nCipher(ilyssa, dina)\nforall x (Formalise(x, ilyssa) -> Ungroomed(ilyssa))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Hamstring(x, marshall))\n\nBig(marshall)\n\nBig(marshall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The arron recommence the chadwick. The arron exit the vally. The arron is cultured. The arron is mexican. The arron felt the vally. The chadwick recommence the arron. The chadwick is isolated. The chadwick felt the arron. The chadwick felt the vally. The vally felt the chadwick. If someone exit the vally then the vally is senile. If someone is senile then they chase the arron. The chadwick does not chase the chadwick.", "logic": "\nRecommence(arron, chadwick)\nExit(arron, vally)\nCultured(arron)\nMexican(arron)\nFelt(arron, vally)\nRecommence(chadwick, arron)\nIsolated(chadwick)\nFelt(chadwick, arron)\nFelt(chadwick, vally)\nFelt(vally, chadwick)\nforall x (Exit(x, vally) -> Senile(vally))\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Recommence(x, arron))\n\nnot Recommence(chadwick, chadwick)\n\nnot Recommence(chadwick, chadwick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The sorcha traffic the gustav. The sorcha coat the bryant. The sorcha is alive. The sorcha is prefrontal. The sorcha headbutt the bryant. The gustav traffic the sorcha. The gustav is bodily. The gustav headbutt the sorcha. The gustav headbutt the bryant. The bryant headbutt the gustav. If someone coat the bryant then the bryant is blate. If someone is blate then they chase the sorcha. The gustav is prefrontal.", "logic": "\nTraffic(sorcha, gustav)\nCoat(sorcha, bryant)\nAlive(sorcha)\nPrefrontal(sorcha)\nHeadbutt(sorcha, bryant)\nTraffic(gustav, sorcha)\nBodily(gustav)\nHeadbutt(gustav, sorcha)\nHeadbutt(gustav, bryant)\nHeadbutt(bryant, gustav)\nforall x (Coat(x, bryant) -> Blate(bryant))\nforall x (Blate(x) -> Traffic(x, sorcha))\n\nPrefrontal(gustav)\n\nPrefrontal(gustav) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-416"} {"premises": "The page is volumed. The page is supersonic. The page is thready. If the page is sedative then the page is zonal. All thready, volumed people are sedative. Kind, volumed people are thready. The page is supersonic.", "logic": "\nVolumed(page)\nSupersonic(page)\nThready(page)\nSedative(page) -> Zonal(page)\nforall x (Thready(x) and Volumed(x) -> Sedative(x))\nforall x (Supersonic(x) and Volumed(x) -> Thready(x))\n\nSupersonic(page)\n\ntherefore Supersonic(page)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The cher is portly. The cher is anisogamic. The cher is acquired. If the cher is cotyloid then the cher is subduable. All acquired, portly people are cotyloid. Kind, portly people are acquired. The cher is not anisogamic.", "logic": "\nPortly(cher)\nAnisogamic(cher)\nAcquired(cher)\nCotyloid(cher) -> Subduable(cher)\nforall x (Acquired(x) and Portly(x) -> Cotyloid(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Portly(x) -> Acquired(x))\n\nnot Anisogamic(cher)\n\ntherefore Anisogamic(cher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The natalina is inclusive. The natalina is encysted. The natalina is fleeting. If the natalina is dextrous then the natalina is pressed. All fleeting, inclusive people are dextrous. Kind, inclusive people are fleeting. The natalina is dextrous.", "logic": "\nInclusive(natalina)\nEncysted(natalina)\nFleeting(natalina)\nDextrous(natalina) -> Pressed(natalina)\nforall x (Fleeting(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Encysted(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Fleeting(x))\n\nDextrous(natalina)\n\nFleeting(natalina) and Inclusive(natalina) and forall x (Fleeting(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Dextrous(x)) -> therefore Dextrous(natalina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The sylvester is nonelected. The sylvester is nonhuman. The sylvester is backhanded. If the sylvester is cumulative then the sylvester is inspired. All backhanded, nonelected people are cumulative. Kind, nonelected people are backhanded. The sylvester is not cumulative.", "logic": "\nNonelected(sylvester)\nNonhuman(sylvester)\nBackhanded(sylvester)\nCumulative(sylvester) -> Inspired(sylvester)\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Cumulative(x))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Backhanded(x))\n\nnot Cumulative(sylvester)\n\nBackhanded(sylvester) and Nonelected(sylvester) and forall x (Backhanded(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Cumulative(x)) -> therefore Cumulative(sylvester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The desdemona is british. The desdemona is rectal. The desdemona is domestic. If the desdemona is flushed then the desdemona is protozoic. All domestic, british people are flushed. Kind, british people are domestic. The desdemona is protozoic.", "logic": "\nBritish(desdemona)\nRectal(desdemona)\nDomestic(desdemona)\nFlushed(desdemona) -> Protozoic(desdemona)\nforall x (Domestic(x) and British(x) -> Flushed(x))\nforall x (Rectal(x) and British(x) -> Domestic(x))\n\nProtozoic(desdemona)\n\nDomestic(desdemona) and British(desdemona) and forall x (Domestic(x) and British(x) -> Flushed(x)) -> therefore Flushed(desdemona) Flushed(desdemona) and Flushed(desdemona) -> Protozoic(desdemona) -> therefore Protozoic(desdemona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The nita is feckless. The nita is abasic. The nita is jaunty. If the nita is unworkable then the nita is undying. All jaunty, feckless people are unworkable. Kind, feckless people are jaunty. The nita is not undying.", "logic": "\nFeckless(nita)\nAbasic(nita)\nJaunty(nita)\nUnworkable(nita) -> Undying(nita)\nforall x (Jaunty(x) and Feckless(x) -> Unworkable(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) and Feckless(x) -> Jaunty(x))\n\nnot Undying(nita)\n\nJaunty(nita) and Feckless(nita) and forall x (Jaunty(x) and Feckless(x) -> Unworkable(x)) -> therefore Unworkable(nita) Unworkable(nita) and Unworkable(nita) -> Undying(nita) -> therefore Undying(nita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The emlynn is boneless. The emlynn is rare. The emlynn is repeatable. If the emlynn is punishable then the emlynn is dazed. All repeatable, boneless people are punishable. Kind, boneless people are repeatable. The emlynn does not see the emlynn.", "logic": "\nBoneless(emlynn)\nRare(emlynn)\nRepeatable(emlynn)\nPunishable(emlynn) -> Dazed(emlynn)\nforall x (Repeatable(x) and Boneless(x) -> Punishable(x))\nforall x (Rare(x) and Boneless(x) -> Repeatable(x))\n\nnot Sees(emlynn, emlynn)\n\nnot Sees(emlynn, emlynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The mattie is monacan. The mattie is lienal. The mattie is filipino. If the mattie is lambent then the mattie is cornish. All filipino, monacan people are lambent. Kind, monacan people are filipino. The mattie needs the mattie.", "logic": "\nMonacan(mattie)\nLienal(mattie)\nFilipino(mattie)\nLambent(mattie) -> Cornish(mattie)\nforall x (Filipino(x) and Monacan(x) -> Lambent(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Monacan(x) -> Filipino(x))\n\nNeeds(mattie, mattie)\n\nNeeds(mattie, mattie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "Morse is punitive. Natassia is fistular. Sergei is manful. If something is unresolved and not flamboyant then it is academic. If something is academic and flamboyant then it is fistular. If something is unresolved and academic then it is fistular. White things are punitive. Blue, unresolved things are not shellproof. If something is shellproof and fistular then it is manful. White things are unresolved. If Natassia is punitive then Natassia is fistular. Morse is punitive.", "logic": "\nPunitive(morse)\nFistular(natassia)\nManful(sergei)\nforall x (Unresolved(x) and not Flamboyant(x) -> Academic(x))\nforall x (Academic(x) and Flamboyant(x) -> Fistular(x))\nforall x (Unresolved(x) and Academic(x) -> Fistular(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Punitive(x))\nforall x (Punitive(x) and Unresolved(x) -> not Shellproof(x))\nforall x (Shellproof(x) and Fistular(x) -> Manful(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Unresolved(x))\nPunitive(natassia) -> Fistular(natassia)\n\nPunitive(morse)\n\ntherefore Punitive(morse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Aaron is laxative. Nanny is dietetic. Nathanial is monotypic. If something is brainless and not spindly then it is blastular. If something is blastular and spindly then it is dietetic. If something is brainless and blastular then it is dietetic. White things are laxative. Blue, brainless things are not assessable. If something is assessable and dietetic then it is monotypic. White things are brainless. If Nanny is laxative then Nanny is dietetic. Aaron is not laxative.", "logic": "\nLaxative(aaron)\nDietetic(nanny)\nMonotypic(nathanial)\nforall x (Brainless(x) and not Spindly(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Blastular(x) and Spindly(x) -> Dietetic(x))\nforall x (Brainless(x) and Blastular(x) -> Dietetic(x))\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Laxative(x))\nforall x (Laxative(x) and Brainless(x) -> not Assessable(x))\nforall x (Assessable(x) and Dietetic(x) -> Monotypic(x))\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Brainless(x))\nLaxative(nanny) -> Dietetic(nanny)\n\nnot Laxative(aaron)\n\ntherefore Laxative(aaron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Guy is andantino. Noreen is fivefold. Havivah is botuliform. If something is welcome and not anserine then it is even. If something is even and anserine then it is fivefold. If something is welcome and even then it is fivefold. White things are andantino. Blue, welcome things are not honorific. If something is honorific and fivefold then it is botuliform. White things are welcome. If Noreen is andantino then Noreen is fivefold. Noreen is welcome.", "logic": "\nAndantino(guy)\nFivefold(noreen)\nBotuliform(havivah)\nforall x (Welcome(x) and not Anserine(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Even(x) and Anserine(x) -> Fivefold(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x) and Even(x) -> Fivefold(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Andantino(x))\nforall x (Andantino(x) and Welcome(x) -> not Honorific(x))\nforall x (Honorific(x) and Fivefold(x) -> Botuliform(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Welcome(x))\nAndantino(noreen) -> Fivefold(noreen)\n\nWelcome(noreen)\n\nFivefold(noreen) and forall x (Fivefold(x) -> Welcome(x)) -> therefore Welcome(noreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Arielle is unnumbered. Oswald is ottoman. Roxie is worthless. If something is vivace and not unlikely then it is runproof. If something is runproof and unlikely then it is ottoman. If something is vivace and runproof then it is ottoman. White things are unnumbered. Blue, vivace things are not societal. If something is societal and ottoman then it is worthless. White things are vivace. If Oswald is unnumbered then Oswald is ottoman. Oswald is not unnumbered.", "logic": "\nUnnumbered(arielle)\nOttoman(oswald)\nWorthless(roxie)\nforall x (Vivace(x) and not Unlikely(x) -> Runproof(x))\nforall x (Runproof(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Ottoman(x))\nforall x (Vivace(x) and Runproof(x) -> Ottoman(x))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) -> Unnumbered(x))\nforall x (Unnumbered(x) and Vivace(x) -> not Societal(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) and Ottoman(x) -> Worthless(x))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) -> Vivace(x))\nUnnumbered(oswald) -> Ottoman(oswald)\n\nnot Unnumbered(oswald)\n\nOttoman(oswald) and forall x (Ottoman(x) -> Unnumbered(x)) -> therefore Unnumbered(oswald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Kacey is unalike. Brear is cellulosid. Eliott is curving. If something is unashamed and not succeeding then it is thick. If something is thick and succeeding then it is cellulosid. If something is unashamed and thick then it is cellulosid. White things are unalike. Blue, unashamed things are not excellent. If something is excellent and cellulosid then it is curving. White things are unashamed. If Brear is unalike then Brear is cellulosid. Brear is not excellent.", "logic": "\nUnalike(kacey)\nCellulosid(brear)\nCurving(eliott)\nforall x (Unashamed(x) and not Succeeding(x) -> Thick(x))\nforall x (Thick(x) and Succeeding(x) -> Cellulosid(x))\nforall x (Unashamed(x) and Thick(x) -> Cellulosid(x))\nforall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Unalike(x) and Unashamed(x) -> not Excellent(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) and Cellulosid(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Unashamed(x))\nUnalike(brear) -> Cellulosid(brear)\n\nnot Excellent(brear)\n\nCellulosid(brear) and forall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Unalike(x)) -> therefore Unalike(brear) Cellulosid(brear) and forall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Unashamed(x)) -> therefore Unashamed(brear) Unalike(brear) and Unashamed(brear) and forall x (Unalike(x) and Unashamed(x) -> not Excellent(x)) -> therefore not Excellent(brear)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Moira is crisscross. Valentia is praising. Deonne is secure. If something is kindly and not unfenced then it is manque. If something is manque and unfenced then it is praising. If something is kindly and manque then it is praising. White things are crisscross. Blue, kindly things are not reverend. If something is reverend and praising then it is secure. White things are kindly. If Valentia is crisscross then Valentia is praising. Valentia is reverend.", "logic": "\nCrisscross(moira)\nPraising(valentia)\nSecure(deonne)\nforall x (Kindly(x) and not Unfenced(x) -> Manque(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) and Unfenced(x) -> Praising(x))\nforall x (Kindly(x) and Manque(x) -> Praising(x))\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Crisscross(x))\nforall x (Crisscross(x) and Kindly(x) -> not Reverend(x))\nforall x (Reverend(x) and Praising(x) -> Secure(x))\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Kindly(x))\nCrisscross(valentia) -> Praising(valentia)\n\nReverend(valentia)\n\nPraising(valentia) and forall x (Praising(x) -> Crisscross(x)) -> therefore Crisscross(valentia) Praising(valentia) and forall x (Praising(x) -> Kindly(x)) -> therefore Kindly(valentia) Crisscross(valentia) and Kindly(valentia) and forall x (Crisscross(x) and Kindly(x) -> not Reverend(x)) -> therefore not Reverend(valentia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Alix is unsteady. Woody is flustered. Clotilda is cherished. If something is antic and not snaky then it is asternal. If something is asternal and snaky then it is flustered. If something is antic and asternal then it is flustered. White things are unsteady. Blue, antic things are not overshot. If something is overshot and flustered then it is cherished. White things are antic. If Woody is unsteady then Woody is flustered. Clotilda is not antic.", "logic": "\nUnsteady(alix)\nFlustered(woody)\nCherished(clotilda)\nforall x (Antic(x) and not Snaky(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Asternal(x) and Snaky(x) -> Flustered(x))\nforall x (Antic(x) and Asternal(x) -> Flustered(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Unsteady(x))\nforall x (Unsteady(x) and Antic(x) -> not Overshot(x))\nforall x (Overshot(x) and Flustered(x) -> Cherished(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Antic(x))\nUnsteady(woody) -> Flustered(woody)\n\nnot Antic(clotilda)\n\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Antic(x)) <- forall x (Asternal(x) and Snaky(x) -> Flustered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Daisi is beige. Crissie is cheliceral. Nathanael is braised. If something is various and not hadean then it is pimpled. If something is pimpled and hadean then it is cheliceral. If something is various and pimpled then it is cheliceral. White things are beige. Blue, various things are not zygomatic. If something is zygomatic and cheliceral then it is braised. White things are various. If Crissie is beige then Crissie is cheliceral. Daisi is pimpled.", "logic": "\nBeige(daisi)\nCheliceral(crissie)\nBraised(nathanael)\nforall x (Various(x) and not Hadean(x) -> Pimpled(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) and Hadean(x) -> Cheliceral(x))\nforall x (Various(x) and Pimpled(x) -> Cheliceral(x))\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) -> Beige(x))\nforall x (Beige(x) and Various(x) -> not Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and Cheliceral(x) -> Braised(x))\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) -> Various(x))\nBeige(crissie) -> Cheliceral(crissie)\n\nPimpled(daisi)\n\nforall x (Various(x) and not Hadean(x) -> Pimpled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Meggie is awake. Benn is sickish. Mirilla is methodical. If something is reflexed and not pecuniary then it is definitive. If something is definitive and pecuniary then it is sickish. If something is reflexed and definitive then it is sickish. White things are awake. Blue, reflexed things are not consultive. If something is consultive and sickish then it is methodical. White things are reflexed. If Benn is awake then Benn is sickish. Mirilla is not definitive.", "logic": "\nAwake(meggie)\nSickish(benn)\nMethodical(mirilla)\nforall x (Reflexed(x) and not Pecuniary(x) -> Definitive(x))\nforall x (Definitive(x) and Pecuniary(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Reflexed(x) and Definitive(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) and Reflexed(x) -> not Consultive(x))\nforall x (Consultive(x) and Sickish(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nAwake(benn) -> Sickish(benn)\n\nnot Definitive(mirilla)\n\nforall x (Reflexed(x) and not Pecuniary(x) -> Definitive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Carleigh is loosened. Eloise is adsorptive. Garold is vibrant. If something is cuneal and not irritating then it is unionized. If something is unionized and irritating then it is adsorptive. If something is cuneal and unionized then it is adsorptive. White things are loosened. Blue, cuneal things are not ethiopian. If something is ethiopian and adsorptive then it is vibrant. White things are cuneal. If Eloise is loosened then Eloise is adsorptive. Carleigh is irritating.", "logic": "\nLoosened(carleigh)\nAdsorptive(eloise)\nVibrant(garold)\nforall x (Cuneal(x) and not Irritating(x) -> Unionized(x))\nforall x (Unionized(x) and Irritating(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) and Unionized(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) -> Loosened(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) and Cuneal(x) -> not Ethiopian(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) and Adsorptive(x) -> Vibrant(x))\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) -> Cuneal(x))\nLoosened(eloise) -> Adsorptive(eloise)\n\nIrritating(carleigh)\n\nIrritating(carleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Jacinda is vague. Carree is noncausal. Joann is menstrual. If something is tactful and not taciturn then it is splay. If something is splay and taciturn then it is noncausal. If something is tactful and splay then it is noncausal. White things are vague. Blue, tactful things are not uncurving. If something is uncurving and noncausal then it is menstrual. White things are tactful. If Carree is vague then Carree is noncausal. Carree is not taciturn.", "logic": "\nVague(jacinda)\nNoncausal(carree)\nMenstrual(joann)\nforall x (Tactful(x) and not Taciturn(x) -> Splay(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) and Taciturn(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Tactful(x) and Splay(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) and Tactful(x) -> not Uncurving(x))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) and Noncausal(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Tactful(x))\nVague(carree) -> Noncausal(carree)\n\nnot Taciturn(carree)\n\nnot Taciturn(carree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "Maurise is deciphered. Dionne is reverse. Marcela is hilar. If something is pyrolignic and not downy then it is irrelevant. If something is irrelevant and downy then it is reverse. If something is pyrolignic and irrelevant then it is reverse. White things are deciphered. Blue, pyrolignic things are not endoergic. If something is endoergic and reverse then it is hilar. White things are pyrolignic. If Dionne is deciphered then Dionne is reverse. Maurise is endoergic.", "logic": "\nDeciphered(maurise)\nReverse(dionne)\nHilar(marcela)\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and not Downy(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) and Downy(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and Irrelevant(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Reverse(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Pyrolignic(x) -> not Endoergic(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and Reverse(x) -> Hilar(x))\nforall x (Reverse(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nDeciphered(dionne) -> Reverse(dionne)\n\nEndoergic(maurise)\n\nEndoergic(maurise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1126"} {"premises": "The eileen mark the natalia. The eileen is crappy. The eileen is indie. The eileen is resinlike. The eileen is tuneful. The eileen is delightful. The eileen woolgather the natalia. The eileen refocus the natalia. The natalia mark the eileen. The natalia is crappy. The natalia is indie. The natalia is resinlike. The natalia is delightful. The natalia woolgather the eileen. The natalia refocus the eileen. If someone woolgather the eileen and they are resinlike then they are tuneful. If someone is tuneful then they see the natalia. If someone woolgather the eileen and they visit the eileen then they are indie. If the eileen mark the natalia and the natalia woolgather the eileen then the eileen is delightful. If someone is resinlike and they see the eileen then the eileen is delightful. If someone is delightful and they chase the natalia then the natalia woolgather the eileen. The natalia mark the eileen.", "logic": "\nMark(eileen, natalia)\nCrappy(eileen)\nIndie(eileen)\nResinlike(eileen)\nTuneful(eileen)\nDelightful(eileen)\nWoolgather(eileen, natalia)\nRefocus(eileen, natalia)\nMark(natalia, eileen)\nCrappy(natalia)\nIndie(natalia)\nResinlike(natalia)\nDelightful(natalia)\nWoolgather(natalia, eileen)\nRefocus(natalia, eileen)\nforall x (Woolgather(x, eileen) and Resinlike(x) -> Tuneful(x))\nforall x (Tuneful(x) -> Woolgather(x, natalia))\nforall x (Woolgather(x, eileen) and Refocus(x, eileen) -> Indie(x))\nMark(eileen, natalia) and Woolgather(natalia, eileen) -> Delightful(eileen)\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and Woolgather(x, eileen) -> Delightful(eileen))\nforall x (Delightful(x) and Mark(x, natalia) -> Woolgather(natalia, eileen))\n\nMark(natalia, eileen)\n\ntherefore Mark(natalia, eileen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The norm proofread the eugene. The norm is popeyed. The norm is homonymic. The norm is authorized. The norm is bastardly. The norm is lonely. The norm fail the eugene. The norm centralise the eugene. The eugene proofread the norm. The eugene is popeyed. The eugene is homonymic. The eugene is authorized. The eugene is lonely. The eugene fail the norm. The eugene centralise the norm. If someone fail the norm and they are authorized then they are bastardly. If someone is bastardly then they see the eugene. If someone fail the norm and they visit the norm then they are homonymic. If the norm proofread the eugene and the eugene fail the norm then the norm is lonely. If someone is authorized and they see the norm then the norm is lonely. If someone is lonely and they chase the eugene then the eugene fail the norm. The eugene is not authorized.", "logic": "\nProofread(norm, eugene)\nPopeyed(norm)\nHomonymic(norm)\nAuthorized(norm)\nBastardly(norm)\nLonely(norm)\nFail(norm, eugene)\nCentralise(norm, eugene)\nProofread(eugene, norm)\nPopeyed(eugene)\nHomonymic(eugene)\nAuthorized(eugene)\nLonely(eugene)\nFail(eugene, norm)\nCentralise(eugene, norm)\nforall x (Fail(x, norm) and Authorized(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> Fail(x, eugene))\nforall x (Fail(x, norm) and Centralise(x, norm) -> Homonymic(x))\nProofread(norm, eugene) and Fail(eugene, norm) -> Lonely(norm)\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Fail(x, norm) -> Lonely(norm))\nforall x (Lonely(x) and Proofread(x, eugene) -> Fail(eugene, norm))\n\nnot Authorized(eugene)\n\ntherefore Authorized(eugene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The alida slander the pier. The alida is gravelly. The alida is immutable. The alida is basiscopic. The alida is phyletic. The alida is blocked. The alida unseal the pier. The alida bicycle the pier. The pier slander the alida. The pier is gravelly. The pier is immutable. The pier is basiscopic. The pier is blocked. The pier unseal the alida. The pier bicycle the alida. If someone unseal the alida and they are basiscopic then they are phyletic. If someone is phyletic then they see the pier. If someone unseal the alida and they visit the alida then they are immutable. If the alida slander the pier and the pier unseal the alida then the alida is blocked. If someone is basiscopic and they see the alida then the alida is blocked. If someone is blocked and they chase the pier then the pier unseal the alida. The pier is phyletic.", "logic": "\nSlander(alida, pier)\nGravelly(alida)\nImmutable(alida)\nBasiscopic(alida)\nPhyletic(alida)\nBlocked(alida)\nUnseal(alida, pier)\nBicycle(alida, pier)\nSlander(pier, alida)\nGravelly(pier)\nImmutable(pier)\nBasiscopic(pier)\nBlocked(pier)\nUnseal(pier, alida)\nBicycle(pier, alida)\nforall x (Unseal(x, alida) and Basiscopic(x) -> Phyletic(x))\nforall x (Phyletic(x) -> Unseal(x, pier))\nforall x (Unseal(x, alida) and Bicycle(x, alida) -> Immutable(x))\nSlander(alida, pier) and Unseal(pier, alida) -> Blocked(alida)\nforall x (Basiscopic(x) and Unseal(x, alida) -> Blocked(alida))\nforall x (Blocked(x) and Slander(x, pier) -> Unseal(pier, alida))\n\nPhyletic(pier)\n\nUnseal(pier, alida) and Basiscopic(pier) and forall x (Unseal(x, alida) and Basiscopic(x) -> Phyletic(x)) -> therefore Phyletic(pier)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The wolfy abjure the roshelle. The wolfy is dietary. The wolfy is bibliotic. The wolfy is grandiose. The wolfy is straying. The wolfy is graspable. The wolfy bromate the roshelle. The wolfy yodel the roshelle. The roshelle abjure the wolfy. The roshelle is dietary. The roshelle is bibliotic. The roshelle is grandiose. The roshelle is graspable. The roshelle bromate the wolfy. The roshelle yodel the wolfy. If someone bromate the wolfy and they are grandiose then they are straying. If someone is straying then they see the roshelle. If someone bromate the wolfy and they visit the wolfy then they are bibliotic. If the wolfy abjure the roshelle and the roshelle bromate the wolfy then the wolfy is graspable. If someone is grandiose and they see the wolfy then the wolfy is graspable. If someone is graspable and they chase the roshelle then the roshelle bromate the wolfy. The roshelle is not straying.", "logic": "\nAbjure(wolfy, roshelle)\nDietary(wolfy)\nBibliotic(wolfy)\nGrandiose(wolfy)\nStraying(wolfy)\nGraspable(wolfy)\nBromate(wolfy, roshelle)\nYodel(wolfy, roshelle)\nAbjure(roshelle, wolfy)\nDietary(roshelle)\nBibliotic(roshelle)\nGrandiose(roshelle)\nGraspable(roshelle)\nBromate(roshelle, wolfy)\nYodel(roshelle, wolfy)\nforall x (Bromate(x, wolfy) and Grandiose(x) -> Straying(x))\nforall x (Straying(x) -> Bromate(x, roshelle))\nforall x (Bromate(x, wolfy) and Yodel(x, wolfy) -> Bibliotic(x))\nAbjure(wolfy, roshelle) and Bromate(roshelle, wolfy) -> Graspable(wolfy)\nforall x (Grandiose(x) and Bromate(x, wolfy) -> Graspable(wolfy))\nforall x (Graspable(x) and Abjure(x, roshelle) -> Bromate(roshelle, wolfy))\n\nnot Straying(roshelle)\n\nBromate(roshelle, wolfy) and Grandiose(roshelle) and forall x (Bromate(x, wolfy) and Grandiose(x) -> Straying(x)) -> therefore Straying(roshelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The sauncho murder the esmaria. The sauncho is regal. The sauncho is regulative. The sauncho is eclectic. The sauncho is headfirst. The sauncho is comburant. The sauncho hunt the esmaria. The sauncho commentate the esmaria. The esmaria murder the sauncho. The esmaria is regal. The esmaria is regulative. The esmaria is eclectic. The esmaria is comburant. The esmaria hunt the sauncho. The esmaria commentate the sauncho. If someone hunt the sauncho and they are eclectic then they are headfirst. If someone is headfirst then they see the esmaria. If someone hunt the sauncho and they visit the sauncho then they are regulative. If the sauncho murder the esmaria and the esmaria hunt the sauncho then the sauncho is comburant. If someone is eclectic and they see the sauncho then the sauncho is comburant. If someone is comburant and they chase the esmaria then the esmaria hunt the sauncho. The esmaria hunt the esmaria.", "logic": "\nMurder(sauncho, esmaria)\nRegal(sauncho)\nRegulative(sauncho)\nEclectic(sauncho)\nHeadfirst(sauncho)\nComburant(sauncho)\nHunt(sauncho, esmaria)\nCommentate(sauncho, esmaria)\nMurder(esmaria, sauncho)\nRegal(esmaria)\nRegulative(esmaria)\nEclectic(esmaria)\nComburant(esmaria)\nHunt(esmaria, sauncho)\nCommentate(esmaria, sauncho)\nforall x (Hunt(x, sauncho) and Eclectic(x) -> Headfirst(x))\nforall x (Headfirst(x) -> Hunt(x, esmaria))\nforall x (Hunt(x, sauncho) and Commentate(x, sauncho) -> Regulative(x))\nMurder(sauncho, esmaria) and Hunt(esmaria, sauncho) -> Comburant(sauncho)\nforall x (Eclectic(x) and Hunt(x, sauncho) -> Comburant(sauncho))\nforall x (Comburant(x) and Murder(x, esmaria) -> Hunt(esmaria, sauncho))\n\nHunt(esmaria, esmaria)\n\nHunt(esmaria, sauncho) and Eclectic(esmaria) and forall x (Hunt(x, sauncho) and Eclectic(x) -> Headfirst(x)) -> therefore Headfirst(esmaria) Headfirst(esmaria) and forall x (Headfirst(x) -> Hunt(x, esmaria)) -> therefore Hunt(esmaria, esmaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The durante cascade the shalna. The durante is perturbing. The durante is unbitter. The durante is swank. The durante is speckled. The durante is lxxii. The durante contend the shalna. The durante lather the shalna. The shalna cascade the durante. The shalna is perturbing. The shalna is unbitter. The shalna is swank. The shalna is lxxii. The shalna contend the durante. The shalna lather the durante. If someone contend the durante and they are swank then they are speckled. If someone is speckled then they see the shalna. If someone contend the durante and they visit the durante then they are unbitter. If the durante cascade the shalna and the shalna contend the durante then the durante is lxxii. If someone is swank and they see the durante then the durante is lxxii. If someone is lxxii and they chase the shalna then the shalna contend the durante. The shalna does not see the shalna.", "logic": "\nCascade(durante, shalna)\nPerturbing(durante)\nUnbitter(durante)\nSwank(durante)\nSpeckled(durante)\nLxxii(durante)\nContend(durante, shalna)\nLather(durante, shalna)\nCascade(shalna, durante)\nPerturbing(shalna)\nUnbitter(shalna)\nSwank(shalna)\nLxxii(shalna)\nContend(shalna, durante)\nLather(shalna, durante)\nforall x (Contend(x, durante) and Swank(x) -> Speckled(x))\nforall x (Speckled(x) -> Contend(x, shalna))\nforall x (Contend(x, durante) and Lather(x, durante) -> Unbitter(x))\nCascade(durante, shalna) and Contend(shalna, durante) -> Lxxii(durante)\nforall x (Swank(x) and Contend(x, durante) -> Lxxii(durante))\nforall x (Lxxii(x) and Cascade(x, shalna) -> Contend(shalna, durante))\n\nnot Contend(shalna, shalna)\n\nContend(shalna, durante) and Swank(shalna) and forall x (Contend(x, durante) and Swank(x) -> Speckled(x)) -> therefore Speckled(shalna) Speckled(shalna) and forall x (Speckled(x) -> Contend(x, shalna)) -> therefore Contend(shalna, shalna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The gardiner degrade the arabele. The gardiner is depicted. The gardiner is rippled. The gardiner is electric. The gardiner is thespian. The gardiner is discrete. The gardiner peril the arabele. The gardiner graph the arabele. The arabele degrade the gardiner. The arabele is depicted. The arabele is rippled. The arabele is electric. The arabele is discrete. The arabele peril the gardiner. The arabele graph the gardiner. If someone peril the gardiner and they are electric then they are thespian. If someone is thespian then they see the arabele. If someone peril the gardiner and they visit the gardiner then they are rippled. If the gardiner degrade the arabele and the arabele peril the gardiner then the gardiner is discrete. If someone is electric and they see the gardiner then the gardiner is discrete. If someone is discrete and they chase the arabele then the arabele peril the gardiner. The arabele does not chase the arabele.", "logic": "\nDegrade(gardiner, arabele)\nDepicted(gardiner)\nRippled(gardiner)\nElectric(gardiner)\nThespian(gardiner)\nDiscrete(gardiner)\nPeril(gardiner, arabele)\nGraph(gardiner, arabele)\nDegrade(arabele, gardiner)\nDepicted(arabele)\nRippled(arabele)\nElectric(arabele)\nDiscrete(arabele)\nPeril(arabele, gardiner)\nGraph(arabele, gardiner)\nforall x (Peril(x, gardiner) and Electric(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) -> Peril(x, arabele))\nforall x (Peril(x, gardiner) and Graph(x, gardiner) -> Rippled(x))\nDegrade(gardiner, arabele) and Peril(arabele, gardiner) -> Discrete(gardiner)\nforall x (Electric(x) and Peril(x, gardiner) -> Discrete(gardiner))\nforall x (Discrete(x) and Degrade(x, arabele) -> Peril(arabele, gardiner))\n\nnot Degrade(arabele, arabele)\n\nnot Degrade(arabele, arabele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The agnese canker the gratia. The agnese is excitatory. The agnese is swooning. The agnese is scripted. The agnese is unifying. The agnese is beamish. The agnese float the gratia. The agnese lame the gratia. The gratia canker the agnese. The gratia is excitatory. The gratia is swooning. The gratia is scripted. The gratia is beamish. The gratia float the agnese. The gratia lame the agnese. If someone float the agnese and they are scripted then they are unifying. If someone is unifying then they see the gratia. If someone float the agnese and they visit the agnese then they are swooning. If the agnese canker the gratia and the gratia float the agnese then the agnese is beamish. If someone is scripted and they see the agnese then the agnese is beamish. If someone is beamish and they chase the gratia then the gratia float the agnese. The agnese float the agnese.", "logic": "\nCanker(agnese, gratia)\nExcitatory(agnese)\nSwooning(agnese)\nScripted(agnese)\nUnifying(agnese)\nBeamish(agnese)\nFloat(agnese, gratia)\nLame(agnese, gratia)\nCanker(gratia, agnese)\nExcitatory(gratia)\nSwooning(gratia)\nScripted(gratia)\nBeamish(gratia)\nFloat(gratia, agnese)\nLame(gratia, agnese)\nforall x (Float(x, agnese) and Scripted(x) -> Unifying(x))\nforall x (Unifying(x) -> Float(x, gratia))\nforall x (Float(x, agnese) and Lame(x, agnese) -> Swooning(x))\nCanker(agnese, gratia) and Float(gratia, agnese) -> Beamish(agnese)\nforall x (Scripted(x) and Float(x, agnese) -> Beamish(agnese))\nforall x (Beamish(x) and Canker(x, gratia) -> Float(gratia, agnese))\n\nFloat(agnese, agnese)\n\nFloat(agnese, agnese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The ellen incommode the harli. The ellen is overeager. The ellen is dislocated. The ellen is paralyzed. The ellen is aqueous. The ellen is hysterical. The ellen implement the harli. The ellen empale the harli. The harli incommode the ellen. The harli is overeager. The harli is dislocated. The harli is paralyzed. The harli is hysterical. The harli implement the ellen. The harli empale the ellen. If someone implement the ellen and they are paralyzed then they are aqueous. If someone is aqueous then they see the harli. If someone implement the ellen and they visit the ellen then they are dislocated. If the ellen incommode the harli and the harli implement the ellen then the ellen is hysterical. If someone is paralyzed and they see the ellen then the ellen is hysterical. If someone is hysterical and they chase the harli then the harli implement the ellen. The ellen does not visit the ellen.", "logic": "\nIncommode(ellen, harli)\nOvereager(ellen)\nDislocated(ellen)\nParalyzed(ellen)\nAqueous(ellen)\nHysterical(ellen)\nImplement(ellen, harli)\nEmpale(ellen, harli)\nIncommode(harli, ellen)\nOvereager(harli)\nDislocated(harli)\nParalyzed(harli)\nHysterical(harli)\nImplement(harli, ellen)\nEmpale(harli, ellen)\nforall x (Implement(x, ellen) and Paralyzed(x) -> Aqueous(x))\nforall x (Aqueous(x) -> Implement(x, harli))\nforall x (Implement(x, ellen) and Empale(x, ellen) -> Dislocated(x))\nIncommode(ellen, harli) and Implement(harli, ellen) -> Hysterical(ellen)\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) and Implement(x, ellen) -> Hysterical(ellen))\nforall x (Hysterical(x) and Incommode(x, harli) -> Implement(harli, ellen))\n\nnot Empale(ellen, ellen)\n\nnot Empale(ellen, ellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The darius chirp the marena. The darius is unclipped. The darius is debased. The darius is provoking. The darius is biased. The darius is adapted. The darius bromate the marena. The darius flit the marena. The marena chirp the darius. The marena is unclipped. The marena is debased. The marena is provoking. The marena is adapted. The marena bromate the darius. The marena flit the darius. If someone bromate the darius and they are provoking then they are biased. If someone is biased then they see the marena. If someone bromate the darius and they visit the darius then they are debased. If the darius chirp the marena and the marena bromate the darius then the darius is adapted. If someone is provoking and they see the darius then the darius is adapted. If someone is adapted and they chase the marena then the marena bromate the darius. The darius chirp the darius.", "logic": "\nChirp(darius, marena)\nUnclipped(darius)\nDebased(darius)\nProvoking(darius)\nBiased(darius)\nAdapted(darius)\nBromate(darius, marena)\nFlit(darius, marena)\nChirp(marena, darius)\nUnclipped(marena)\nDebased(marena)\nProvoking(marena)\nAdapted(marena)\nBromate(marena, darius)\nFlit(marena, darius)\nforall x (Bromate(x, darius) and Provoking(x) -> Biased(x))\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Bromate(x, marena))\nforall x (Bromate(x, darius) and Flit(x, darius) -> Debased(x))\nChirp(darius, marena) and Bromate(marena, darius) -> Adapted(darius)\nforall x (Provoking(x) and Bromate(x, darius) -> Adapted(darius))\nforall x (Adapted(x) and Chirp(x, marena) -> Bromate(marena, darius))\n\nChirp(darius, darius)\n\nChirp(darius, darius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The josi distract the ikey. The ikey is puerile. The ikey is nautical. If the josi distract the ikey then the josi is nautical. If the josi dazzle the ikey then the josi is nautical. If the josi retaliate the ikey then the josi is footloose. If something retaliate the josi and it does not need the josi then the josi retaliate the ikey. If something is nautical then it dazzle the ikey. If something is nautical and it does not eat the ikey then the ikey is not headfirst. The ikey is puerile.", "logic": "\nDistract(josi, ikey)\nPuerile(ikey)\nNautical(ikey)\nDistract(josi, ikey) -> Nautical(josi)\nDazzle(josi, ikey) -> Nautical(josi)\nRetaliate(josi, ikey) -> Footloose(josi)\nforall x (Retaliate(x, josi) and not Dazzle(x, josi) -> Retaliate(josi, ikey))\nforall x (Nautical(x) -> Dazzle(x, ikey))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and not Retaliate(x, ikey) -> not Headfirst(ikey))\n\nPuerile(ikey)\n\ntherefore Puerile(ikey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The gertrudis distract the luciano. The luciano is conformist. The luciano is unbranched. If the gertrudis distract the luciano then the gertrudis is unbranched. If the gertrudis surtax the luciano then the gertrudis is unbranched. If the gertrudis inflect the luciano then the gertrudis is methodist. If something inflect the gertrudis and it does not need the gertrudis then the gertrudis inflect the luciano. If something is unbranched then it surtax the luciano. If something is unbranched and it does not eat the luciano then the luciano is not decreased. The luciano is not unbranched.", "logic": "\nDistract(gertrudis, luciano)\nConformist(luciano)\nUnbranched(luciano)\nDistract(gertrudis, luciano) -> Unbranched(gertrudis)\nSurtax(gertrudis, luciano) -> Unbranched(gertrudis)\nInflect(gertrudis, luciano) -> Methodist(gertrudis)\nforall x (Inflect(x, gertrudis) and not Surtax(x, gertrudis) -> Inflect(gertrudis, luciano))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Surtax(x, luciano))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) and not Inflect(x, luciano) -> not Decreased(luciano))\n\nnot Unbranched(luciano)\n\ntherefore Unbranched(luciano)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The felisha insert the anais. The anais is consummate. The anais is undecided. If the felisha insert the anais then the felisha is undecided. If the felisha savvy the anais then the felisha is undecided. If the felisha glare the anais then the felisha is roadless. If something glare the felisha and it does not need the felisha then the felisha glare the anais. If something is undecided then it savvy the anais. If something is undecided and it does not eat the anais then the anais is not size. The anais savvy the anais.", "logic": "\nInsert(felisha, anais)\nConsummate(anais)\nUndecided(anais)\nInsert(felisha, anais) -> Undecided(felisha)\nSavvy(felisha, anais) -> Undecided(felisha)\nGlare(felisha, anais) -> Roadless(felisha)\nforall x (Glare(x, felisha) and not Savvy(x, felisha) -> Glare(felisha, anais))\nforall x (Undecided(x) -> Savvy(x, anais))\nforall x (Undecided(x) and not Glare(x, anais) -> not Size(anais))\n\nSavvy(anais, anais)\n\nUndecided(anais) and forall x (Undecided(x) -> Savvy(x, anais)) -> therefore Savvy(anais, anais)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The dara pursue the tomlin. The tomlin is strangled. The tomlin is penal. If the dara pursue the tomlin then the dara is penal. If the dara microfilm the tomlin then the dara is penal. If the dara harness the tomlin then the dara is chordate. If something harness the dara and it does not need the dara then the dara harness the tomlin. If something is penal then it microfilm the tomlin. If something is penal and it does not eat the tomlin then the tomlin is not moribund. The tomlin does not need the tomlin.", "logic": "\nPursue(dara, tomlin)\nStrangled(tomlin)\nPenal(tomlin)\nPursue(dara, tomlin) -> Penal(dara)\nMicrofilm(dara, tomlin) -> Penal(dara)\nHarness(dara, tomlin) -> Chordate(dara)\nforall x (Harness(x, dara) and not Microfilm(x, dara) -> Harness(dara, tomlin))\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Microfilm(x, tomlin))\nforall x (Penal(x) and not Harness(x, tomlin) -> not Moribund(tomlin))\n\nnot Microfilm(tomlin, tomlin)\n\nPenal(tomlin) and forall x (Penal(x) -> Microfilm(x, tomlin)) -> therefore Microfilm(tomlin, tomlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The meggie drone the moreen. The moreen is recurved. The moreen is mucoid. If the meggie drone the moreen then the meggie is mucoid. If the meggie allege the moreen then the meggie is mucoid. If the meggie date the moreen then the meggie is moire. If something date the meggie and it does not need the meggie then the meggie date the moreen. If something is mucoid then it allege the moreen. If something is mucoid and it does not eat the moreen then the moreen is not pompous. The meggie allege the moreen.", "logic": "\nDrone(meggie, moreen)\nRecurved(moreen)\nMucoid(moreen)\nDrone(meggie, moreen) -> Mucoid(meggie)\nAllege(meggie, moreen) -> Mucoid(meggie)\nDate(meggie, moreen) -> Moire(meggie)\nforall x (Date(x, meggie) and not Allege(x, meggie) -> Date(meggie, moreen))\nforall x (Mucoid(x) -> Allege(x, moreen))\nforall x (Mucoid(x) and not Date(x, moreen) -> not Pompous(moreen))\n\nAllege(meggie, moreen)\n\nDrone(meggie, moreen) and Drone(meggie, moreen) -> Mucoid(meggie) -> therefore Mucoid(meggie) Mucoid(meggie) and forall x (Mucoid(x) -> Allege(x, moreen)) -> therefore Allege(meggie, moreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The kamillah card the norman. The norman is pretended. The norman is touchable. If the kamillah card the norman then the kamillah is touchable. If the kamillah pyramid the norman then the kamillah is touchable. If the kamillah bugger the norman then the kamillah is accepted. If something bugger the kamillah and it does not need the kamillah then the kamillah bugger the norman. If something is touchable then it pyramid the norman. If something is touchable and it does not eat the norman then the norman is not hardback. The kamillah does not need the norman.", "logic": "\nCard(kamillah, norman)\nPretended(norman)\nTouchable(norman)\nCard(kamillah, norman) -> Touchable(kamillah)\nPyramid(kamillah, norman) -> Touchable(kamillah)\nBugger(kamillah, norman) -> Accepted(kamillah)\nforall x (Bugger(x, kamillah) and not Pyramid(x, kamillah) -> Bugger(kamillah, norman))\nforall x (Touchable(x) -> Pyramid(x, norman))\nforall x (Touchable(x) and not Bugger(x, norman) -> not Hardback(norman))\n\nnot Pyramid(kamillah, norman)\n\nCard(kamillah, norman) and Card(kamillah, norman) -> Touchable(kamillah) -> therefore Touchable(kamillah) Touchable(kamillah) and forall x (Touchable(x) -> Pyramid(x, norman)) -> therefore Pyramid(kamillah, norman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The catlee preordain the bunnie. The bunnie is historical. The bunnie is ruby. If the catlee preordain the bunnie then the catlee is ruby. If the catlee blast the bunnie then the catlee is ruby. If the catlee imperil the bunnie then the catlee is bindable. If something imperil the catlee and it does not need the catlee then the catlee imperil the bunnie. If something is ruby then it blast the bunnie. If something is ruby and it does not eat the bunnie then the bunnie is not soundproof. The catlee does not eat the bunnie.", "logic": "\nPreordain(catlee, bunnie)\nHistorical(bunnie)\nRuby(bunnie)\nPreordain(catlee, bunnie) -> Ruby(catlee)\nBlast(catlee, bunnie) -> Ruby(catlee)\nImperil(catlee, bunnie) -> Bindable(catlee)\nforall x (Imperil(x, catlee) and not Blast(x, catlee) -> Imperil(catlee, bunnie))\nforall x (Ruby(x) -> Blast(x, bunnie))\nforall x (Ruby(x) and not Imperil(x, bunnie) -> not Soundproof(bunnie))\n\nnot Imperil(catlee, bunnie)\n\nforall x (Imperil(x, catlee) and not Blast(x, catlee) -> Imperil(catlee, bunnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The gavin season the melita. The melita is girlish. The melita is segregated. If the gavin season the melita then the gavin is segregated. If the gavin communise the melita then the gavin is segregated. If the gavin recount the melita then the gavin is crookback. If something recount the gavin and it does not need the gavin then the gavin recount the melita. If something is segregated then it communise the melita. If something is segregated and it does not eat the melita then the melita is not lifted. The gavin is crookback.", "logic": "\nSeason(gavin, melita)\nGirlish(melita)\nSegregated(melita)\nSeason(gavin, melita) -> Segregated(gavin)\nCommunise(gavin, melita) -> Segregated(gavin)\nRecount(gavin, melita) -> Crookback(gavin)\nforall x (Recount(x, gavin) and not Communise(x, gavin) -> Recount(gavin, melita))\nforall x (Segregated(x) -> Communise(x, melita))\nforall x (Segregated(x) and not Recount(x, melita) -> not Lifted(melita))\n\nCrookback(gavin)\n\nRecount(gavin, melita) -> Crookback(gavin) <- forall x (Recount(x, gavin) and not Communise(x, gavin) -> Recount(gavin, melita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The hagen overstress the korry. The korry is comparable. The korry is unwrapped. If the hagen overstress the korry then the hagen is unwrapped. If the hagen deputise the korry then the hagen is unwrapped. If the hagen blazon the korry then the hagen is shattered. If something blazon the hagen and it does not need the hagen then the hagen blazon the korry. If something is unwrapped then it deputise the korry. If something is unwrapped and it does not eat the korry then the korry is not jolty. The hagen does not eat the hagen.", "logic": "\nOverstress(hagen, korry)\nComparable(korry)\nUnwrapped(korry)\nOverstress(hagen, korry) -> Unwrapped(hagen)\nDeputise(hagen, korry) -> Unwrapped(hagen)\nBlazon(hagen, korry) -> Shattered(hagen)\nforall x (Blazon(x, hagen) and not Deputise(x, hagen) -> Blazon(hagen, korry))\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Deputise(x, korry))\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) and not Blazon(x, korry) -> not Jolty(korry))\n\nnot Blazon(hagen, hagen)\n\nnot Blazon(hagen, hagen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The reeva view the sascha. The sascha is total. The sascha is semiotic. If the reeva view the sascha then the reeva is semiotic. If the reeva uniformise the sascha then the reeva is semiotic. If the reeva skunk the sascha then the reeva is noncaloric. If something skunk the reeva and it does not need the reeva then the reeva skunk the sascha. If something is semiotic then it uniformise the sascha. If something is semiotic and it does not eat the sascha then the sascha is not precooked. The reeva is round.", "logic": "\nView(reeva, sascha)\nTotal(sascha)\nSemiotic(sascha)\nView(reeva, sascha) -> Semiotic(reeva)\nUniformise(reeva, sascha) -> Semiotic(reeva)\nSkunk(reeva, sascha) -> Noncaloric(reeva)\nforall x (Skunk(x, reeva) and not Uniformise(x, reeva) -> Skunk(reeva, sascha))\nforall x (Semiotic(x) -> Uniformise(x, sascha))\nforall x (Semiotic(x) and not Skunk(x, sascha) -> not Precooked(sascha))\n\nRound(reeva)\n\nRound(reeva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The arlina misspeak the andrzej. The andrzej is amateurish. The andrzej is clxxx. If the arlina misspeak the andrzej then the arlina is clxxx. If the arlina divorce the andrzej then the arlina is clxxx. If the arlina hasp the andrzej then the arlina is oiled. If something hasp the arlina and it does not need the arlina then the arlina hasp the andrzej. If something is clxxx then it divorce the andrzej. If something is clxxx and it does not eat the andrzej then the andrzej is not undersize. The andrzej is not round.", "logic": "\nMisspeak(arlina, andrzej)\nAmateurish(andrzej)\nClxxx(andrzej)\nMisspeak(arlina, andrzej) -> Clxxx(arlina)\nDivorce(arlina, andrzej) -> Clxxx(arlina)\nHasp(arlina, andrzej) -> Oiled(arlina)\nforall x (Hasp(x, arlina) and not Divorce(x, arlina) -> Hasp(arlina, andrzej))\nforall x (Clxxx(x) -> Divorce(x, andrzej))\nforall x (Clxxx(x) and not Hasp(x, andrzej) -> not Undersize(andrzej))\n\nnot Round(andrzej)\n\nnot Round(andrzej) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The ailey subtilise the rafaelita. The rafaelita is purebred. The rafaelita is twinned. If the ailey subtilise the rafaelita then the ailey is twinned. If the ailey rosin the rafaelita then the ailey is twinned. If the ailey entangle the rafaelita then the ailey is taoist. If something entangle the ailey and it does not need the ailey then the ailey entangle the rafaelita. If something is twinned then it rosin the rafaelita. If something is twinned and it does not eat the rafaelita then the rafaelita is not adjuratory. The rafaelita is adjuratory.", "logic": "\nSubtilise(ailey, rafaelita)\nPurebred(rafaelita)\nTwinned(rafaelita)\nSubtilise(ailey, rafaelita) -> Twinned(ailey)\nRosin(ailey, rafaelita) -> Twinned(ailey)\nEntangle(ailey, rafaelita) -> Taoist(ailey)\nforall x (Entangle(x, ailey) and not Rosin(x, ailey) -> Entangle(ailey, rafaelita))\nforall x (Twinned(x) -> Rosin(x, rafaelita))\nforall x (Twinned(x) and not Entangle(x, rafaelita) -> not Adjuratory(rafaelita))\n\nAdjuratory(rafaelita)\n\nAdjuratory(rafaelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1895"} {"premises": "The jimmy is sunbaked. The jimmy outpoint the carolynn. The carolynn invite the jimmy. If something present the carolynn then the carolynn outpoint the jimmy. If something invite the carolynn then it is eviscerate. If the carolynn invite the jimmy and the jimmy outpoint the carolynn then the jimmy invite the carolynn. The jimmy outpoint the carolynn.", "logic": "\nSunbaked(jimmy)\nOutpoint(jimmy, carolynn)\nInvite(carolynn, jimmy)\nforall x (Present(x, carolynn) -> Outpoint(carolynn, jimmy))\nforall x (Invite(x, carolynn) -> Eviscerate(x))\nInvite(carolynn, jimmy) and Outpoint(jimmy, carolynn) -> Invite(jimmy, carolynn)\n\nOutpoint(jimmy, carolynn)\n\ntherefore Outpoint(jimmy, carolynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The alfonso is sleazy. The alfonso wank the alonso. The alonso bloom the alfonso. If something acetylate the alonso then the alonso wank the alfonso. If something bloom the alonso then it is model. If the alonso bloom the alfonso and the alfonso wank the alonso then the alfonso bloom the alonso. The alfonso is not sleazy.", "logic": "\nSleazy(alfonso)\nWank(alfonso, alonso)\nBloom(alonso, alfonso)\nforall x (Acetylate(x, alonso) -> Wank(alonso, alfonso))\nforall x (Bloom(x, alonso) -> Model(x))\nBloom(alonso, alfonso) and Wank(alfonso, alonso) -> Bloom(alfonso, alonso)\n\nnot Sleazy(alfonso)\n\ntherefore Sleazy(alfonso)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The len is juiceless. The len apportion the owen. The owen gloss the len. If something thrum the owen then the owen apportion the len. If something gloss the owen then it is pocked. If the owen gloss the len and the len apportion the owen then the len gloss the owen. The len gloss the owen.", "logic": "\nJuiceless(len)\nApportion(len, owen)\nGloss(owen, len)\nforall x (Thrum(x, owen) -> Apportion(owen, len))\nforall x (Gloss(x, owen) -> Pocked(x))\nGloss(owen, len) and Apportion(len, owen) -> Gloss(len, owen)\n\nGloss(len, owen)\n\nGloss(owen, len) and Apportion(len, owen) and Gloss(owen, len) and Apportion(len, owen) -> Gloss(len, owen) -> therefore Gloss(len, owen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The veronike is bacillary. The veronike burnish the celle. The celle enrich the veronike. If something prospect the celle then the celle burnish the veronike. If something enrich the celle then it is expository. If the celle enrich the veronike and the veronike burnish the celle then the veronike enrich the celle. The veronike does not visit the celle.", "logic": "\nBacillary(veronike)\nBurnish(veronike, celle)\nEnrich(celle, veronike)\nforall x (Prospect(x, celle) -> Burnish(celle, veronike))\nforall x (Enrich(x, celle) -> Expository(x))\nEnrich(celle, veronike) and Burnish(veronike, celle) -> Enrich(veronike, celle)\n\nnot Enrich(veronike, celle)\n\nEnrich(celle, veronike) and Burnish(veronike, celle) and Enrich(celle, veronike) and Burnish(veronike, celle) -> Enrich(veronike, celle) -> therefore Enrich(veronike, celle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The odin is trousered. The odin devour the fortune. The fortune retrospect the odin. If something gibe the fortune then the fortune devour the odin. If something retrospect the fortune then it is obliging. If the fortune retrospect the odin and the odin devour the fortune then the odin retrospect the fortune. The odin is obliging.", "logic": "\nTrousered(odin)\nDevour(odin, fortune)\nRetrospect(fortune, odin)\nforall x (Gibe(x, fortune) -> Devour(fortune, odin))\nforall x (Retrospect(x, fortune) -> Obliging(x))\nRetrospect(fortune, odin) and Devour(odin, fortune) -> Retrospect(odin, fortune)\n\nObliging(odin)\n\nRetrospect(fortune, odin) and Devour(odin, fortune) and Retrospect(fortune, odin) and Devour(odin, fortune) -> Retrospect(odin, fortune) -> therefore Retrospect(odin, fortune) Retrospect(odin, fortune) and forall x (Retrospect(x, fortune) -> Obliging(x)) -> therefore Obliging(odin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The cecil is eminent. The cecil fluff the dell. The dell roof the cecil. If something hoodwink the dell then the dell fluff the cecil. If something roof the dell then it is glial. If the dell roof the cecil and the cecil fluff the dell then the cecil roof the dell. The cecil is not glial.", "logic": "\nEminent(cecil)\nFluff(cecil, dell)\nRoof(dell, cecil)\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, dell) -> Fluff(dell, cecil))\nforall x (Roof(x, dell) -> Glial(x))\nRoof(dell, cecil) and Fluff(cecil, dell) -> Roof(cecil, dell)\n\nnot Glial(cecil)\n\nRoof(dell, cecil) and Fluff(cecil, dell) and Roof(dell, cecil) and Fluff(cecil, dell) -> Roof(cecil, dell) -> therefore Roof(cecil, dell) Roof(cecil, dell) and forall x (Roof(x, dell) -> Glial(x)) -> therefore Glial(cecil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The erma is aneroid. The erma decant the riki. The riki buzz the erma. If something peak the riki then the riki decant the erma. If something buzz the riki then it is corroded. If the riki buzz the erma and the erma decant the riki then the erma buzz the riki. The riki does not like the erma.", "logic": "\nAneroid(erma)\nDecant(erma, riki)\nBuzz(riki, erma)\nforall x (Peak(x, riki) -> Decant(riki, erma))\nforall x (Buzz(x, riki) -> Corroded(x))\nBuzz(riki, erma) and Decant(erma, riki) -> Buzz(erma, riki)\n\nnot Decant(riki, erma)\n\nforall x (Peak(x, riki) -> Decant(riki, erma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The hadleigh is plumelike. The hadleigh derogate the luciano. The luciano summer the hadleigh. If something skid the luciano then the luciano derogate the hadleigh. If something summer the luciano then it is obvious. If the luciano summer the hadleigh and the hadleigh derogate the luciano then the hadleigh summer the luciano. The luciano is obvious.", "logic": "\nPlumelike(hadleigh)\nDerogate(hadleigh, luciano)\nSummer(luciano, hadleigh)\nforall x (Skid(x, luciano) -> Derogate(luciano, hadleigh))\nforall x (Summer(x, luciano) -> Obvious(x))\nSummer(luciano, hadleigh) and Derogate(hadleigh, luciano) -> Summer(hadleigh, luciano)\n\nObvious(luciano)\n\nforall x (Summer(x, luciano) -> Obvious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The camel is adolescent. The camel postdate the ioana. The ioana trash the camel. If something liberate the ioana then the ioana postdate the camel. If something trash the ioana then it is totaled. If the ioana trash the camel and the camel postdate the ioana then the camel trash the ioana. The camel is not kind.", "logic": "\nAdolescent(camel)\nPostdate(camel, ioana)\nTrash(ioana, camel)\nforall x (Liberate(x, ioana) -> Postdate(ioana, camel))\nforall x (Trash(x, ioana) -> Totaled(x))\nTrash(ioana, camel) and Postdate(camel, ioana) -> Trash(camel, ioana)\n\nnot Kind(camel)\n\nnot Kind(camel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The ilysa is binate. The ilysa graph the kynthia. The kynthia readapt the ilysa. If something strop the kynthia then the kynthia graph the ilysa. If something readapt the kynthia then it is unhinged. If the kynthia readapt the ilysa and the ilysa graph the kynthia then the ilysa readapt the kynthia. The ilysa strop the ilysa.", "logic": "\nBinate(ilysa)\nGraph(ilysa, kynthia)\nReadapt(kynthia, ilysa)\nforall x (Strop(x, kynthia) -> Graph(kynthia, ilysa))\nforall x (Readapt(x, kynthia) -> Unhinged(x))\nReadapt(kynthia, ilysa) and Graph(ilysa, kynthia) -> Readapt(ilysa, kynthia)\n\nStrop(ilysa, ilysa)\n\nStrop(ilysa, ilysa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The ernaline is isoclinic. The ernaline cackel the sophie. The sophie color the ernaline. If something hyphen the sophie then the sophie cackel the ernaline. If something color the sophie then it is fiberoptic. If the sophie color the ernaline and the ernaline cackel the sophie then the ernaline color the sophie. The sophie does not like the sophie.", "logic": "\nIsoclinic(ernaline)\nCackel(ernaline, sophie)\nColor(sophie, ernaline)\nforall x (Hyphen(x, sophie) -> Cackel(sophie, ernaline))\nforall x (Color(x, sophie) -> Fiberoptic(x))\nColor(sophie, ernaline) and Cackel(ernaline, sophie) -> Color(ernaline, sophie)\n\nnot Cackel(sophie, sophie)\n\nnot Cackel(sophie, sophie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The stacie is sternal. The stacie cake the ivett. The ivett crenellate the stacie. If something anathemize the ivett then the ivett cake the stacie. If something crenellate the ivett then it is vocational. If the ivett crenellate the stacie and the stacie cake the ivett then the stacie crenellate the ivett. The ivett anathemize the ivett.", "logic": "\nSternal(stacie)\nCake(stacie, ivett)\nCrenellate(ivett, stacie)\nforall x (Anathemize(x, ivett) -> Cake(ivett, stacie))\nforall x (Crenellate(x, ivett) -> Vocational(x))\nCrenellate(ivett, stacie) and Cake(stacie, ivett) -> Crenellate(stacie, ivett)\n\nAnathemize(ivett, ivett)\n\nAnathemize(ivett, ivett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The anetta cicatrize the berri. The anetta is recognised. The anetta is angled. The anetta is adventive. The anetta remold the ella. The berri is printable. The berri is angled. The berri elute the anetta. The ella cicatrize the anetta. The ella elute the berri. If the anetta is schismatic and the anetta is not recognised then the anetta cicatrize the berri. If someone is recognised then they do not eat the ella. If the anetta cicatrize the berri and the berri elute the anetta then the berri remold the ella. If someone is angled and they eat the ella then they do not need the berri. If someone remold the berri and the berri cicatrize the anetta then the anetta is angled. If the anetta does not eat the ella then the ella is schismatic. The berri elute the anetta.", "logic": "\nCicatrize(anetta, berri)\nRecognised(anetta)\nAngled(anetta)\nAdventive(anetta)\nRemold(anetta, ella)\nPrintable(berri)\nAngled(berri)\nElute(berri, anetta)\nCicatrize(ella, anetta)\nElute(ella, berri)\nSchismatic(anetta) and not Recognised(anetta) -> Cicatrize(anetta, berri)\nforall x (Recognised(x) -> not Cicatrize(x, ella))\nCicatrize(anetta, berri) and Elute(berri, anetta) -> Remold(berri, ella)\nforall x (Angled(x) and Cicatrize(x, ella) -> not Elute(x, berri))\nforall x (Remold(x, berri) and Cicatrize(berri, anetta) -> Angled(anetta))\nnot Cicatrize(anetta, ella) -> Schismatic(ella)\n\nElute(berri, anetta)\n\ntherefore Elute(berri, anetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The albertina bath the ilyssa. The albertina is capped. The albertina is upsetting. The albertina is fitting. The albertina perforate the fleurette. The ilyssa is capital. The ilyssa is upsetting. The ilyssa subsist the albertina. The fleurette bath the albertina. The fleurette subsist the ilyssa. If the albertina is jurassic and the albertina is not capped then the albertina bath the ilyssa. If someone is capped then they do not eat the fleurette. If the albertina bath the ilyssa and the ilyssa subsist the albertina then the ilyssa perforate the fleurette. If someone is upsetting and they eat the fleurette then they do not need the ilyssa. If someone perforate the ilyssa and the ilyssa bath the albertina then the albertina is upsetting. If the albertina does not eat the fleurette then the fleurette is jurassic. The ilyssa is not capital.", "logic": "\nBath(albertina, ilyssa)\nCapped(albertina)\nUpsetting(albertina)\nFitting(albertina)\nPerforate(albertina, fleurette)\nCapital(ilyssa)\nUpsetting(ilyssa)\nSubsist(ilyssa, albertina)\nBath(fleurette, albertina)\nSubsist(fleurette, ilyssa)\nJurassic(albertina) and not Capped(albertina) -> Bath(albertina, ilyssa)\nforall x (Capped(x) -> not Bath(x, fleurette))\nBath(albertina, ilyssa) and Subsist(ilyssa, albertina) -> Perforate(ilyssa, fleurette)\nforall x (Upsetting(x) and Bath(x, fleurette) -> not Subsist(x, ilyssa))\nforall x (Perforate(x, ilyssa) and Bath(ilyssa, albertina) -> Upsetting(albertina))\nnot Bath(albertina, fleurette) -> Jurassic(fleurette)\n\nnot Capital(ilyssa)\n\ntherefore Capital(ilyssa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The beryle toot the francis. The beryle is rawboned. The beryle is exact. The beryle is sorrowing. The beryle sport the federico. The francis is finical. The francis is exact. The francis refashion the beryle. The federico toot the beryle. The federico refashion the francis. If the beryle is eukaryotic and the beryle is not rawboned then the beryle toot the francis. If someone is rawboned then they do not eat the federico. If the beryle toot the francis and the francis refashion the beryle then the francis sport the federico. If someone is exact and they eat the federico then they do not need the francis. If someone sport the francis and the francis toot the beryle then the beryle is exact. If the beryle does not eat the federico then the federico is eukaryotic. The francis sport the federico.", "logic": "\nToot(beryle, francis)\nRawboned(beryle)\nExact(beryle)\nSorrowing(beryle)\nSport(beryle, federico)\nFinical(francis)\nExact(francis)\nRefashion(francis, beryle)\nToot(federico, beryle)\nRefashion(federico, francis)\nEukaryotic(beryle) and not Rawboned(beryle) -> Toot(beryle, francis)\nforall x (Rawboned(x) -> not Toot(x, federico))\nToot(beryle, francis) and Refashion(francis, beryle) -> Sport(francis, federico)\nforall x (Exact(x) and Toot(x, federico) -> not Refashion(x, francis))\nforall x (Sport(x, francis) and Toot(francis, beryle) -> Exact(beryle))\nnot Toot(beryle, federico) -> Eukaryotic(federico)\n\nSport(francis, federico)\n\nToot(beryle, francis) and Refashion(francis, beryle) and Toot(beryle, francis) and Refashion(francis, beryle) -> Sport(francis, federico) -> therefore Sport(francis, federico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The jeremie recast the kiersten. The jeremie is active. The jeremie is oxidised. The jeremie is vapourific. The jeremie stump the florice. The kiersten is sylvan. The kiersten is oxidised. The kiersten lance the jeremie. The florice recast the jeremie. The florice lance the kiersten. If the jeremie is sixth and the jeremie is not active then the jeremie recast the kiersten. If someone is active then they do not eat the florice. If the jeremie recast the kiersten and the kiersten lance the jeremie then the kiersten stump the florice. If someone is oxidised and they eat the florice then they do not need the kiersten. If someone stump the kiersten and the kiersten recast the jeremie then the jeremie is oxidised. If the jeremie does not eat the florice then the florice is sixth. The jeremie recast the florice.", "logic": "\nRecast(jeremie, kiersten)\nActive(jeremie)\nOxidised(jeremie)\nVapourific(jeremie)\nStump(jeremie, florice)\nSylvan(kiersten)\nOxidised(kiersten)\nLance(kiersten, jeremie)\nRecast(florice, jeremie)\nLance(florice, kiersten)\nSixth(jeremie) and not Active(jeremie) -> Recast(jeremie, kiersten)\nforall x (Active(x) -> not Recast(x, florice))\nRecast(jeremie, kiersten) and Lance(kiersten, jeremie) -> Stump(kiersten, florice)\nforall x (Oxidised(x) and Recast(x, florice) -> not Lance(x, kiersten))\nforall x (Stump(x, kiersten) and Recast(kiersten, jeremie) -> Oxidised(jeremie))\nnot Recast(jeremie, florice) -> Sixth(florice)\n\nRecast(jeremie, florice)\n\nActive(jeremie) and forall x (Active(x) -> not Recast(x, florice)) -> therefore not Recast(jeremie, florice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The anais pussyfoot the meara. The anais is transfixed. The anais is untended. The anais is bumptious. The anais mature the sheena. The meara is antisocial. The meara is untended. The meara hoop the anais. The sheena pussyfoot the anais. The sheena hoop the meara. If the anais is benzylic and the anais is not transfixed then the anais pussyfoot the meara. If someone is transfixed then they do not eat the sheena. If the anais pussyfoot the meara and the meara hoop the anais then the meara mature the sheena. If someone is untended and they eat the sheena then they do not need the meara. If someone mature the meara and the meara pussyfoot the anais then the anais is untended. If the anais does not eat the sheena then the sheena is benzylic. The sheena is benzylic.", "logic": "\nPussyfoot(anais, meara)\nTransfixed(anais)\nUntended(anais)\nBumptious(anais)\nMature(anais, sheena)\nAntisocial(meara)\nUntended(meara)\nHoop(meara, anais)\nPussyfoot(sheena, anais)\nHoop(sheena, meara)\nBenzylic(anais) and not Transfixed(anais) -> Pussyfoot(anais, meara)\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> not Pussyfoot(x, sheena))\nPussyfoot(anais, meara) and Hoop(meara, anais) -> Mature(meara, sheena)\nforall x (Untended(x) and Pussyfoot(x, sheena) -> not Hoop(x, meara))\nforall x (Mature(x, meara) and Pussyfoot(meara, anais) -> Untended(anais))\nnot Pussyfoot(anais, sheena) -> Benzylic(sheena)\n\nBenzylic(sheena)\n\nTransfixed(anais) and forall x (Transfixed(x) -> not Pussyfoot(x, sheena)) -> therefore not Pussyfoot(anais, sheena) not Pussyfoot(anais, sheena) and not Pussyfoot(anais, sheena) -> Benzylic(sheena) -> therefore Benzylic(sheena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The farley whiteout the rivkah. The farley is ownerless. The farley is outcast. The farley is chlamydial. The farley succumb the hubert. The rivkah is formulary. The rivkah is outcast. The rivkah tailor the farley. The hubert whiteout the farley. The hubert tailor the rivkah. If the farley is jihadi and the farley is not ownerless then the farley whiteout the rivkah. If someone is ownerless then they do not eat the hubert. If the farley whiteout the rivkah and the rivkah tailor the farley then the rivkah succumb the hubert. If someone is outcast and they eat the hubert then they do not need the rivkah. If someone succumb the rivkah and the rivkah whiteout the farley then the farley is outcast. If the farley does not eat the hubert then the hubert is jihadi. The hubert is not jihadi.", "logic": "\nWhiteout(farley, rivkah)\nOwnerless(farley)\nOutcast(farley)\nChlamydial(farley)\nSuccumb(farley, hubert)\nFormulary(rivkah)\nOutcast(rivkah)\nTailor(rivkah, farley)\nWhiteout(hubert, farley)\nTailor(hubert, rivkah)\nJihadi(farley) and not Ownerless(farley) -> Whiteout(farley, rivkah)\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> not Whiteout(x, hubert))\nWhiteout(farley, rivkah) and Tailor(rivkah, farley) -> Succumb(rivkah, hubert)\nforall x (Outcast(x) and Whiteout(x, hubert) -> not Tailor(x, rivkah))\nforall x (Succumb(x, rivkah) and Whiteout(rivkah, farley) -> Outcast(farley))\nnot Whiteout(farley, hubert) -> Jihadi(hubert)\n\nnot Jihadi(hubert)\n\nOwnerless(farley) and forall x (Ownerless(x) -> not Whiteout(x, hubert)) -> therefore not Whiteout(farley, hubert) not Whiteout(farley, hubert) and not Whiteout(farley, hubert) -> Jihadi(hubert) -> therefore Jihadi(hubert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The cristina intubate the annamaria. The cristina is imposed. The cristina is aliphatic. The cristina is oxidizable. The cristina lamb the isador. The annamaria is epilithic. The annamaria is aliphatic. The annamaria engross the cristina. The isador intubate the cristina. The isador engross the annamaria. If the cristina is ruandan and the cristina is not imposed then the cristina intubate the annamaria. If someone is imposed then they do not eat the isador. If the cristina intubate the annamaria and the annamaria engross the cristina then the annamaria lamb the isador. If someone is aliphatic and they eat the isador then they do not need the annamaria. If someone lamb the annamaria and the annamaria intubate the cristina then the cristina is aliphatic. If the cristina does not eat the isador then the isador is ruandan. The annamaria does not like the cristina.", "logic": "\nIntubate(cristina, annamaria)\nImposed(cristina)\nAliphatic(cristina)\nOxidizable(cristina)\nLamb(cristina, isador)\nEpilithic(annamaria)\nAliphatic(annamaria)\nEngross(annamaria, cristina)\nIntubate(isador, cristina)\nEngross(isador, annamaria)\nRuandan(cristina) and not Imposed(cristina) -> Intubate(cristina, annamaria)\nforall x (Imposed(x) -> not Intubate(x, isador))\nIntubate(cristina, annamaria) and Engross(annamaria, cristina) -> Lamb(annamaria, isador)\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) and Intubate(x, isador) -> not Engross(x, annamaria))\nforall x (Lamb(x, annamaria) and Intubate(annamaria, cristina) -> Aliphatic(cristina))\nnot Intubate(cristina, isador) -> Ruandan(isador)\n\nnot Lamb(annamaria, cristina)\n\nnot Lamb(annamaria, cristina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The myrna besprinkle the harold. The myrna is chesty. The myrna is curdled. The myrna is fecund. The myrna combine the jenifer. The harold is undreamt. The harold is curdled. The harold weaken the myrna. The jenifer besprinkle the myrna. The jenifer weaken the harold. If the myrna is splay and the myrna is not chesty then the myrna besprinkle the harold. If someone is chesty then they do not eat the jenifer. If the myrna besprinkle the harold and the harold weaken the myrna then the harold combine the jenifer. If someone is curdled and they eat the jenifer then they do not need the harold. If someone combine the harold and the harold besprinkle the myrna then the myrna is curdled. If the myrna does not eat the jenifer then the jenifer is splay. The harold is chesty.", "logic": "\nBesprinkle(myrna, harold)\nChesty(myrna)\nCurdled(myrna)\nFecund(myrna)\nCombine(myrna, jenifer)\nUndreamt(harold)\nCurdled(harold)\nWeaken(harold, myrna)\nBesprinkle(jenifer, myrna)\nWeaken(jenifer, harold)\nSplay(myrna) and not Chesty(myrna) -> Besprinkle(myrna, harold)\nforall x (Chesty(x) -> not Besprinkle(x, jenifer))\nBesprinkle(myrna, harold) and Weaken(harold, myrna) -> Combine(harold, jenifer)\nforall x (Curdled(x) and Besprinkle(x, jenifer) -> not Weaken(x, harold))\nforall x (Combine(x, harold) and Besprinkle(harold, myrna) -> Curdled(myrna))\nnot Besprinkle(myrna, jenifer) -> Splay(jenifer)\n\nChesty(harold)\n\nChesty(harold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The alane resettle the felicity. The alane is cuttable. The alane is tref. The alane is teal. The alane cosign the shimon. The felicity is unploughed. The felicity is tref. The felicity dusk the alane. The shimon resettle the alane. The shimon dusk the felicity. If the alane is tubeless and the alane is not cuttable then the alane resettle the felicity. If someone is cuttable then they do not eat the shimon. If the alane resettle the felicity and the felicity dusk the alane then the felicity cosign the shimon. If someone is tref and they eat the shimon then they do not need the felicity. If someone cosign the felicity and the felicity resettle the alane then the alane is tref. If the alane does not eat the shimon then the shimon is tubeless. The felicity does not like the felicity.", "logic": "\nResettle(alane, felicity)\nCuttable(alane)\nTref(alane)\nTeal(alane)\nCosign(alane, shimon)\nUnploughed(felicity)\nTref(felicity)\nDusk(felicity, alane)\nResettle(shimon, alane)\nDusk(shimon, felicity)\nTubeless(alane) and not Cuttable(alane) -> Resettle(alane, felicity)\nforall x (Cuttable(x) -> not Resettle(x, shimon))\nResettle(alane, felicity) and Dusk(felicity, alane) -> Cosign(felicity, shimon)\nforall x (Tref(x) and Resettle(x, shimon) -> not Dusk(x, felicity))\nforall x (Cosign(x, felicity) and Resettle(felicity, alane) -> Tref(alane))\nnot Resettle(alane, shimon) -> Tubeless(shimon)\n\nnot Cosign(felicity, felicity)\n\nnot Cosign(felicity, felicity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The brianne phonate the spud. The brianne is unprovoked. The brianne is embryonic. The brianne is benefic. The brianne romanise the fannie. The spud is anorectal. The spud is embryonic. The spud instill the brianne. The fannie phonate the brianne. The fannie instill the spud. If the brianne is womanlike and the brianne is not unprovoked then the brianne phonate the spud. If someone is unprovoked then they do not eat the fannie. If the brianne phonate the spud and the spud instill the brianne then the spud romanise the fannie. If someone is embryonic and they eat the fannie then they do not need the spud. If someone romanise the spud and the spud phonate the brianne then the brianne is embryonic. If the brianne does not eat the fannie then the fannie is womanlike. The brianne phonate the brianne.", "logic": "\nPhonate(brianne, spud)\nUnprovoked(brianne)\nEmbryonic(brianne)\nBenefic(brianne)\nRomanise(brianne, fannie)\nAnorectal(spud)\nEmbryonic(spud)\nInstill(spud, brianne)\nPhonate(fannie, brianne)\nInstill(fannie, spud)\nWomanlike(brianne) and not Unprovoked(brianne) -> Phonate(brianne, spud)\nforall x (Unprovoked(x) -> not Phonate(x, fannie))\nPhonate(brianne, spud) and Instill(spud, brianne) -> Romanise(spud, fannie)\nforall x (Embryonic(x) and Phonate(x, fannie) -> not Instill(x, spud))\nforall x (Romanise(x, spud) and Phonate(spud, brianne) -> Embryonic(brianne))\nnot Phonate(brianne, fannie) -> Womanlike(fannie)\n\nPhonate(brianne, brianne)\n\nPhonate(brianne, brianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The evangelin cake the forrester. The evangelin is subaqueous. The evangelin is probative. The evangelin is genovese. The evangelin gazump the marleen. The forrester is bashful. The forrester is probative. The forrester labialise the evangelin. The marleen cake the evangelin. The marleen labialise the forrester. If the evangelin is fruity and the evangelin is not subaqueous then the evangelin cake the forrester. If someone is subaqueous then they do not eat the marleen. If the evangelin cake the forrester and the forrester labialise the evangelin then the forrester gazump the marleen. If someone is probative and they eat the marleen then they do not need the forrester. If someone gazump the forrester and the forrester cake the evangelin then the evangelin is probative. If the evangelin does not eat the marleen then the marleen is fruity. The marleen does not like the evangelin.", "logic": "\nCake(evangelin, forrester)\nSubaqueous(evangelin)\nProbative(evangelin)\nGenovese(evangelin)\nGazump(evangelin, marleen)\nBashful(forrester)\nProbative(forrester)\nLabialise(forrester, evangelin)\nCake(marleen, evangelin)\nLabialise(marleen, forrester)\nFruity(evangelin) and not Subaqueous(evangelin) -> Cake(evangelin, forrester)\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) -> not Cake(x, marleen))\nCake(evangelin, forrester) and Labialise(forrester, evangelin) -> Gazump(forrester, marleen)\nforall x (Probative(x) and Cake(x, marleen) -> not Labialise(x, forrester))\nforall x (Gazump(x, forrester) and Cake(forrester, evangelin) -> Probative(evangelin))\nnot Cake(evangelin, marleen) -> Fruity(marleen)\n\nnot Gazump(marleen, evangelin)\n\nnot Gazump(marleen, evangelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "The shamit hash the willi. The shamit is xeric. The shamit is soleless. The shamit is motionless. The shamit encamp the mariellen. The willi is honest. The willi is soleless. The willi bight the shamit. The mariellen hash the shamit. The mariellen bight the willi. If the shamit is mossy and the shamit is not xeric then the shamit hash the willi. If someone is xeric then they do not eat the mariellen. If the shamit hash the willi and the willi bight the shamit then the willi encamp the mariellen. If someone is soleless and they eat the mariellen then they do not need the willi. If someone encamp the willi and the willi hash the shamit then the shamit is soleless. If the shamit does not eat the mariellen then the mariellen is mossy. The mariellen bight the mariellen.", "logic": "\nHash(shamit, willi)\nXeric(shamit)\nSoleless(shamit)\nMotionless(shamit)\nEncamp(shamit, mariellen)\nHonest(willi)\nSoleless(willi)\nBight(willi, shamit)\nHash(mariellen, shamit)\nBight(mariellen, willi)\nMossy(shamit) and not Xeric(shamit) -> Hash(shamit, willi)\nforall x (Xeric(x) -> not Hash(x, mariellen))\nHash(shamit, willi) and Bight(willi, shamit) -> Encamp(willi, mariellen)\nforall x (Soleless(x) and Hash(x, mariellen) -> not Bight(x, willi))\nforall x (Encamp(x, willi) and Hash(willi, shamit) -> Soleless(shamit))\nnot Hash(shamit, mariellen) -> Mossy(mariellen)\n\nBight(mariellen, mariellen)\n\nBight(mariellen, mariellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1848"} {"premises": "Rutter is collagenic. Sky is collagenic. Morten is praetorian. If Morten is not praetorian and Morten is not scottish then Morten is collagenic. If Sky is not praetorian then Sky is not collagenic. All modernized, equatorial things are sagittal. If something is modernized then it is sagittal. If something is equatorial then it is collagenic. All praetorian things are modernized. If something is equatorial and not modernized then it is gristly. If Sky is equatorial and Sky is not collagenic then Sky is sagittal. Rutter is collagenic.", "logic": "\nCollagenic(rutter)\nCollagenic(sky)\nPraetorian(morten)\nnot Praetorian(morten) and not Scottish(morten) -> Collagenic(morten)\nnot Praetorian(sky) -> not Collagenic(sky)\nforall x (Modernized(x) and Equatorial(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nforall x (Equatorial(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Praetorian(x) -> Modernized(x))\nforall x (Equatorial(x) and not Modernized(x) -> Gristly(x))\nEquatorial(sky) and not Collagenic(sky) -> Sagittal(sky)\n\nCollagenic(rutter)\n\ntherefore Collagenic(rutter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Griffin is malarial. Silva is malarial. Christof is outlandish. If Christof is not outlandish and Christof is not portly then Christof is malarial. If Silva is not outlandish then Silva is not malarial. All uncrowded, larval things are auburn. If something is uncrowded then it is auburn. If something is larval then it is malarial. All outlandish things are uncrowded. If something is larval and not uncrowded then it is manual. If Silva is larval and Silva is not malarial then Silva is auburn. Christof is not outlandish.", "logic": "\nMalarial(griffin)\nMalarial(silva)\nOutlandish(christof)\nnot Outlandish(christof) and not Portly(christof) -> Malarial(christof)\nnot Outlandish(silva) -> not Malarial(silva)\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) and Larval(x) -> Auburn(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Auburn(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Outlandish(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) and not Uncrowded(x) -> Manual(x))\nLarval(silva) and not Malarial(silva) -> Auburn(silva)\n\nnot Outlandish(christof)\n\ntherefore Outlandish(christof)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Brittany is ictic. Harri is ictic. West is primary. If West is not primary and West is not unliterary then West is ictic. If Harri is not primary then Harri is not ictic. All assured, picky things are thousandth. If something is assured then it is thousandth. If something is picky then it is ictic. All primary things are assured. If something is picky and not assured then it is glutted. If Harri is picky and Harri is not ictic then Harri is thousandth. West is assured.", "logic": "\nIctic(brittany)\nIctic(harri)\nPrimary(west)\nnot Primary(west) and not Unliterary(west) -> Ictic(west)\nnot Primary(harri) -> not Ictic(harri)\nforall x (Assured(x) and Picky(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Ictic(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Assured(x))\nforall x (Picky(x) and not Assured(x) -> Glutted(x))\nPicky(harri) and not Ictic(harri) -> Thousandth(harri)\n\nAssured(west)\n\nPrimary(west) and forall x (Primary(x) -> Assured(x)) -> therefore Assured(west)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Trudey is arboresque. Jocelyne is arboresque. Jeb is fijian. If Jeb is not fijian and Jeb is not barren then Jeb is arboresque. If Jocelyne is not fijian then Jocelyne is not arboresque. All episcopal, schizoid things are dextrous. If something is episcopal then it is dextrous. If something is schizoid then it is arboresque. All fijian things are episcopal. If something is schizoid and not episcopal then it is burdensome. If Jocelyne is schizoid and Jocelyne is not arboresque then Jocelyne is dextrous. Jeb is not episcopal.", "logic": "\nArboresque(trudey)\nArboresque(jocelyne)\nFijian(jeb)\nnot Fijian(jeb) and not Barren(jeb) -> Arboresque(jeb)\nnot Fijian(jocelyne) -> not Arboresque(jocelyne)\nforall x (Episcopal(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Episcopal(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Schizoid(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Fijian(x) -> Episcopal(x))\nforall x (Schizoid(x) and not Episcopal(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nSchizoid(jocelyne) and not Arboresque(jocelyne) -> Dextrous(jocelyne)\n\nnot Episcopal(jeb)\n\nFijian(jeb) and forall x (Fijian(x) -> Episcopal(x)) -> therefore Episcopal(jeb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Emera is obsessive. Marlane is obsessive. Rafaelita is stable. If Rafaelita is not stable and Rafaelita is not expiratory then Rafaelita is obsessive. If Marlane is not stable then Marlane is not obsessive. All unchanging, coeliac things are faveolate. If something is unchanging then it is faveolate. If something is coeliac then it is obsessive. All stable things are unchanging. If something is coeliac and not unchanging then it is bivalent. If Marlane is coeliac and Marlane is not obsessive then Marlane is faveolate. Rafaelita is faveolate.", "logic": "\nObsessive(emera)\nObsessive(marlane)\nStable(rafaelita)\nnot Stable(rafaelita) and not Expiratory(rafaelita) -> Obsessive(rafaelita)\nnot Stable(marlane) -> not Obsessive(marlane)\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and Coeliac(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Unchanging(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Obsessive(x))\nforall x (Stable(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) and not Unchanging(x) -> Bivalent(x))\nCoeliac(marlane) and not Obsessive(marlane) -> Faveolate(marlane)\n\nFaveolate(rafaelita)\n\nStable(rafaelita) and forall x (Stable(x) -> Unchanging(x)) -> therefore Unchanging(rafaelita) Unchanging(rafaelita) and forall x (Unchanging(x) -> Faveolate(x)) -> therefore Faveolate(rafaelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Buffy is fore. Arthur is fore. Rennie is housebound. If Rennie is not housebound and Rennie is not fortified then Rennie is fore. If Arthur is not housebound then Arthur is not fore. All reeking, fourfold things are muslim. If something is reeking then it is muslim. If something is fourfold then it is fore. All housebound things are reeking. If something is fourfold and not reeking then it is electric. If Arthur is fourfold and Arthur is not fore then Arthur is muslim. Rennie is not muslim.", "logic": "\nFore(buffy)\nFore(arthur)\nHousebound(rennie)\nnot Housebound(rennie) and not Fortified(rennie) -> Fore(rennie)\nnot Housebound(arthur) -> not Fore(arthur)\nforall x (Reeking(x) and Fourfold(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Reeking(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Fourfold(x) -> Fore(x))\nforall x (Housebound(x) -> Reeking(x))\nforall x (Fourfold(x) and not Reeking(x) -> Electric(x))\nFourfold(arthur) and not Fore(arthur) -> Muslim(arthur)\n\nnot Muslim(rennie)\n\nHousebound(rennie) and forall x (Housebound(x) -> Reeking(x)) -> therefore Reeking(rennie) Reeking(rennie) and forall x (Reeking(x) -> Muslim(x)) -> therefore Muslim(rennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Benedicta is hypodermic. Ortensia is hypodermic. Inessa is ablaze. If Inessa is not ablaze and Inessa is not utilizable then Inessa is hypodermic. If Ortensia is not ablaze then Ortensia is not hypodermic. All mordant, aeschylean things are beetle. If something is mordant then it is beetle. If something is aeschylean then it is hypodermic. All ablaze things are mordant. If something is aeschylean and not mordant then it is unlearned. If Ortensia is aeschylean and Ortensia is not hypodermic then Ortensia is beetle. Inessa is not hypodermic.", "logic": "\nHypodermic(benedicta)\nHypodermic(ortensia)\nAblaze(inessa)\nnot Ablaze(inessa) and not Utilizable(inessa) -> Hypodermic(inessa)\nnot Ablaze(ortensia) -> not Hypodermic(ortensia)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Aeschylean(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) -> Hypodermic(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) and not Mordant(x) -> Unlearned(x))\nAeschylean(ortensia) and not Hypodermic(ortensia) -> Beetle(ortensia)\n\nnot Hypodermic(inessa)\n\nnot Ablaze(inessa) and not Utilizable(inessa) -> Hypodermic(inessa) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Roselin is crowded. Roderigo is crowded. Jule is unnotched. If Jule is not unnotched and Jule is not palatial then Jule is crowded. If Roderigo is not unnotched then Roderigo is not crowded. All canine, intimate things are shelled. If something is canine then it is shelled. If something is intimate then it is crowded. All unnotched things are canine. If something is intimate and not canine then it is blackish. If Roderigo is intimate and Roderigo is not crowded then Roderigo is shelled. Roderigo is blackish.", "logic": "\nCrowded(roselin)\nCrowded(roderigo)\nUnnotched(jule)\nnot Unnotched(jule) and not Palatial(jule) -> Crowded(jule)\nnot Unnotched(roderigo) -> not Crowded(roderigo)\nforall x (Canine(x) and Intimate(x) -> Shelled(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Shelled(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x) -> Crowded(x))\nforall x (Unnotched(x) -> Canine(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x) and not Canine(x) -> Blackish(x))\nIntimate(roderigo) and not Crowded(roderigo) -> Shelled(roderigo)\n\nBlackish(roderigo)\n\nforall x (Intimate(x) and not Canine(x) -> Blackish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Chase is marsupial. Edith is marsupial. Tatiana is staggering. If Tatiana is not staggering and Tatiana is not placatory then Tatiana is marsupial. If Edith is not staggering then Edith is not marsupial. All arboresque, fogbound things are naked. If something is arboresque then it is naked. If something is fogbound then it is marsupial. All staggering things are arboresque. If something is fogbound and not arboresque then it is touchy. If Edith is fogbound and Edith is not marsupial then Edith is naked. Tatiana is not touchy.", "logic": "\nMarsupial(chase)\nMarsupial(edith)\nStaggering(tatiana)\nnot Staggering(tatiana) and not Placatory(tatiana) -> Marsupial(tatiana)\nnot Staggering(edith) -> not Marsupial(edith)\nforall x (Arboresque(x) and Fogbound(x) -> Naked(x))\nforall x (Arboresque(x) -> Naked(x))\nforall x (Fogbound(x) -> Marsupial(x))\nforall x (Staggering(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Fogbound(x) and not Arboresque(x) -> Touchy(x))\nFogbound(edith) and not Marsupial(edith) -> Naked(edith)\n\nnot Touchy(tatiana)\n\nforall x (Fogbound(x) and not Arboresque(x) -> Touchy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Lara is withered. Luise is withered. Reza is reassuring. If Reza is not reassuring and Reza is not wavering then Reza is withered. If Luise is not reassuring then Luise is not withered. All undeterred, wieldy things are bayesian. If something is undeterred then it is bayesian. If something is wieldy then it is withered. All reassuring things are undeterred. If something is wieldy and not undeterred then it is sweptwing. If Luise is wieldy and Luise is not withered then Luise is bayesian. Luise is wavering.", "logic": "\nWithered(lara)\nWithered(luise)\nReassuring(reza)\nnot Reassuring(reza) and not Wavering(reza) -> Withered(reza)\nnot Reassuring(luise) -> not Withered(luise)\nforall x (Undeterred(x) and Wieldy(x) -> Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Undeterred(x) -> Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) -> Withered(x))\nforall x (Reassuring(x) -> Undeterred(x))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and not Undeterred(x) -> Sweptwing(x))\nWieldy(luise) and not Withered(luise) -> Bayesian(luise)\n\nWavering(luise)\n\nWavering(luise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Phelia is dangerous. Estel is dangerous. Mireielle is puffy. If Mireielle is not puffy and Mireielle is not ruling then Mireielle is dangerous. If Estel is not puffy then Estel is not dangerous. All inerrable, assaultive things are validating. If something is inerrable then it is validating. If something is assaultive then it is dangerous. All puffy things are inerrable. If something is assaultive and not inerrable then it is caudated. If Estel is assaultive and Estel is not dangerous then Estel is validating. Mireielle is not ruling.", "logic": "\nDangerous(phelia)\nDangerous(estel)\nPuffy(mireielle)\nnot Puffy(mireielle) and not Ruling(mireielle) -> Dangerous(mireielle)\nnot Puffy(estel) -> not Dangerous(estel)\nforall x (Inerrable(x) and Assaultive(x) -> Validating(x))\nforall x (Inerrable(x) -> Validating(x))\nforall x (Assaultive(x) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Inerrable(x))\nforall x (Assaultive(x) and not Inerrable(x) -> Caudated(x))\nAssaultive(estel) and not Dangerous(estel) -> Validating(estel)\n\nnot Ruling(mireielle)\n\nnot Ruling(mireielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Gracia is subsequent. Shadow is subsequent. Reta is sewed. If Reta is not sewed and Reta is not hydroponic then Reta is subsequent. If Shadow is not sewed then Shadow is not subsequent. All arminian, palpebrate things are unchaste. If something is arminian then it is unchaste. If something is palpebrate then it is subsequent. All sewed things are arminian. If something is palpebrate and not arminian then it is confiscate. If Shadow is palpebrate and Shadow is not subsequent then Shadow is unchaste. Shadow is sewed.", "logic": "\nSubsequent(gracia)\nSubsequent(shadow)\nSewed(reta)\nnot Sewed(reta) and not Hydroponic(reta) -> Subsequent(reta)\nnot Sewed(shadow) -> not Subsequent(shadow)\nforall x (Arminian(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Arminian(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Arminian(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and not Arminian(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nPalpebrate(shadow) and not Subsequent(shadow) -> Unchaste(shadow)\n\nSewed(shadow)\n\nSewed(shadow) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-375"} {"premises": "Nanine is mirthful. Gay is palpitant. Emanuel is climatical. Lucienne is climatical. All foremost people are mirthful. If someone is climatical then they are palpitant. If someone is climatical then they are foremost. If Emanuel is copular and Emanuel is praiseful then Emanuel is climatical. If someone is foremost then they are copular. If Nanine is foremost and Nanine is copular then Nanine is climatical. Emanuel is climatical.", "logic": "\nMirthful(nanine)\nPalpitant(gay)\nClimatical(emanuel)\nClimatical(lucienne)\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> Foremost(x))\nCopular(emanuel) and Praiseful(emanuel) -> Climatical(emanuel)\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Copular(x))\nForemost(nanine) and Copular(nanine) -> Climatical(nanine)\n\nClimatical(emanuel)\n\ntherefore Climatical(emanuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Merry is sissy. Bessy is buried. Tabatha is reducible. Ellwood is reducible. All undeserved people are sissy. If someone is reducible then they are buried. If someone is reducible then they are undeserved. If Tabatha is defamatory and Tabatha is gladsome then Tabatha is reducible. If someone is undeserved then they are defamatory. If Merry is undeserved and Merry is defamatory then Merry is reducible. Merry is not sissy.", "logic": "\nSissy(merry)\nBuried(bessy)\nReducible(tabatha)\nReducible(ellwood)\nforall x (Undeserved(x) -> Sissy(x))\nforall x (Reducible(x) -> Buried(x))\nforall x (Reducible(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nDefamatory(tabatha) and Gladsome(tabatha) -> Reducible(tabatha)\nforall x (Undeserved(x) -> Defamatory(x))\nUndeserved(merry) and Defamatory(merry) -> Reducible(merry)\n\nnot Sissy(merry)\n\ntherefore Sissy(merry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Hermon is mitral. Gershom is undutiful. Graig is labile. Susi is labile. All enduring people are mitral. If someone is labile then they are undutiful. If someone is labile then they are enduring. If Graig is eutherian and Graig is disyllabic then Graig is labile. If someone is enduring then they are eutherian. If Hermon is enduring and Hermon is eutherian then Hermon is labile. Graig is undutiful.", "logic": "\nMitral(hermon)\nUndutiful(gershom)\nLabile(graig)\nLabile(susi)\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> Mitral(x))\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Undutiful(x))\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Enduring(x))\nEutherian(graig) and Disyllabic(graig) -> Labile(graig)\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> Eutherian(x))\nEnduring(hermon) and Eutherian(hermon) -> Labile(hermon)\n\nUndutiful(graig)\n\nLabile(graig) and forall x (Labile(x) -> Undutiful(x)) -> therefore Undutiful(graig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Hamil is awesome. Jorrie is instinct. Maegan is salmon. Mair is salmon. All unblended people are awesome. If someone is salmon then they are instinct. If someone is salmon then they are unblended. If Maegan is specked and Maegan is uncousinly then Maegan is salmon. If someone is unblended then they are specked. If Hamil is unblended and Hamil is specked then Hamil is salmon. Mair is not unblended.", "logic": "\nAwesome(hamil)\nInstinct(jorrie)\nSalmon(maegan)\nSalmon(mair)\nforall x (Unblended(x) -> Awesome(x))\nforall x (Salmon(x) -> Instinct(x))\nforall x (Salmon(x) -> Unblended(x))\nSpecked(maegan) and Uncousinly(maegan) -> Salmon(maegan)\nforall x (Unblended(x) -> Specked(x))\nUnblended(hamil) and Specked(hamil) -> Salmon(hamil)\n\nnot Unblended(mair)\n\nSalmon(mair) and forall x (Salmon(x) -> Unblended(x)) -> therefore Unblended(mair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Angelica is hardbound. Zahara is prying. Ninnette is pimpled. Rubetta is pimpled. All outlined people are hardbound. If someone is pimpled then they are prying. If someone is pimpled then they are outlined. If Ninnette is reptilian and Ninnette is abkhaz then Ninnette is pimpled. If someone is outlined then they are reptilian. If Angelica is outlined and Angelica is reptilian then Angelica is pimpled. Ninnette is hardbound.", "logic": "\nHardbound(angelica)\nPrying(zahara)\nPimpled(ninnette)\nPimpled(rubetta)\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) -> Prying(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) -> Outlined(x))\nReptilian(ninnette) and Abkhaz(ninnette) -> Pimpled(ninnette)\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nOutlined(angelica) and Reptilian(angelica) -> Pimpled(angelica)\n\nHardbound(ninnette)\n\nPimpled(ninnette) and forall x (Pimpled(x) -> Outlined(x)) -> therefore Outlined(ninnette) Outlined(ninnette) and forall x (Outlined(x) -> Hardbound(x)) -> therefore Hardbound(ninnette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Anastasia is gigantic. Kitty is changing. Lurleen is smoothbore. Tarra is smoothbore. All vapourised people are gigantic. If someone is smoothbore then they are changing. If someone is smoothbore then they are vapourised. If Lurleen is stagy and Lurleen is incised then Lurleen is smoothbore. If someone is vapourised then they are stagy. If Anastasia is vapourised and Anastasia is stagy then Anastasia is smoothbore. Tarra is not gigantic.", "logic": "\nGigantic(anastasia)\nChanging(kitty)\nSmoothbore(lurleen)\nSmoothbore(tarra)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) -> Changing(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nStagy(lurleen) and Incised(lurleen) -> Smoothbore(lurleen)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Stagy(x))\nVapourised(anastasia) and Stagy(anastasia) -> Smoothbore(anastasia)\n\nnot Gigantic(tarra)\n\nSmoothbore(tarra) and forall x (Smoothbore(x) -> Vapourised(x)) -> therefore Vapourised(tarra) Vapourised(tarra) and forall x (Vapourised(x) -> Gigantic(x)) -> therefore Gigantic(tarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Flossi is hypaethral. Adnan is autoecious. Dorette is goethian. Hyman is goethian. All falling people are hypaethral. If someone is goethian then they are autoecious. If someone is goethian then they are falling. If Dorette is jellylike and Dorette is related then Dorette is goethian. If someone is falling then they are jellylike. If Flossi is falling and Flossi is jellylike then Flossi is goethian. Flossi is not autoecious.", "logic": "\nHypaethral(flossi)\nAutoecious(adnan)\nGoethian(dorette)\nGoethian(hyman)\nforall x (Falling(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Autoecious(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Falling(x))\nJellylike(dorette) and Related(dorette) -> Goethian(dorette)\nforall x (Falling(x) -> Jellylike(x))\nFalling(flossi) and Jellylike(flossi) -> Goethian(flossi)\n\nnot Autoecious(flossi)\n\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Autoecious(x)) <- Falling(flossi) and Jellylike(flossi) -> Goethian(flossi) <- forall x (Goethian(x) -> Falling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Toma is alive. Rosalind is sown. Sarina is carbuncled. Cob is carbuncled. All moderate people are alive. If someone is carbuncled then they are sown. If someone is carbuncled then they are moderate. If Sarina is fallen and Sarina is glabellar then Sarina is carbuncled. If someone is moderate then they are fallen. If Toma is moderate and Toma is fallen then Toma is carbuncled. Rosalind is fallen.", "logic": "\nAlive(toma)\nSown(rosalind)\nCarbuncled(sarina)\nCarbuncled(cob)\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Alive(x))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Sown(x))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Moderate(x))\nFallen(sarina) and Glabellar(sarina) -> Carbuncled(sarina)\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Fallen(x))\nModerate(toma) and Fallen(toma) -> Carbuncled(toma)\n\nFallen(rosalind)\n\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Fallen(x)) <- forall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Moderate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Timi is twin. Rozanne is aurous. Oralia is nightly. Lorita is nightly. All girlish people are twin. If someone is nightly then they are aurous. If someone is nightly then they are girlish. If Oralia is applicable and Oralia is ovate then Oralia is nightly. If someone is girlish then they are applicable. If Timi is girlish and Timi is applicable then Timi is nightly. Timi is not applicable.", "logic": "\nTwin(timi)\nAurous(rozanne)\nNightly(oralia)\nNightly(lorita)\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Twin(x))\nforall x (Nightly(x) -> Aurous(x))\nforall x (Nightly(x) -> Girlish(x))\nApplicable(oralia) and Ovate(oralia) -> Nightly(oralia)\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Applicable(x))\nGirlish(timi) and Applicable(timi) -> Nightly(timi)\n\nnot Applicable(timi)\n\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Applicable(x)) <- forall x (Nightly(x) -> Girlish(x)) <- Girlish(timi) and Applicable(timi) -> Nightly(timi) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Fae is diametric. Gilberte is greasy. Chelsy is analog. Arliene is analog. All ecological people are diametric. If someone is analog then they are greasy. If someone is analog then they are ecological. If Chelsy is muscovite and Chelsy is acoustical then Chelsy is analog. If someone is ecological then they are muscovite. If Fae is ecological and Fae is muscovite then Fae is analog. Fae is acoustical.", "logic": "\nDiametric(fae)\nGreasy(gilberte)\nAnalog(chelsy)\nAnalog(arliene)\nforall x (Ecological(x) -> Diametric(x))\nforall x (Analog(x) -> Greasy(x))\nforall x (Analog(x) -> Ecological(x))\nMuscovite(chelsy) and Acoustical(chelsy) -> Analog(chelsy)\nforall x (Ecological(x) -> Muscovite(x))\nEcological(fae) and Muscovite(fae) -> Analog(fae)\n\nAcoustical(fae)\n\nAcoustical(fae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Patrica is interred. Laurence is garmented. Dela is touching. Erica is touching. All episodic people are interred. If someone is touching then they are garmented. If someone is touching then they are episodic. If Dela is globular and Dela is through then Dela is touching. If someone is episodic then they are globular. If Patrica is episodic and Patrica is globular then Patrica is touching. Dela is not through.", "logic": "\nInterred(patrica)\nGarmented(laurence)\nTouching(dela)\nTouching(erica)\nforall x (Episodic(x) -> Interred(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Episodic(x))\nGlobular(dela) and Through(dela) -> Touching(dela)\nforall x (Episodic(x) -> Globular(x))\nEpisodic(patrica) and Globular(patrica) -> Touching(patrica)\n\nnot Through(dela)\n\nnot Through(dela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "Darrin is virginal. Scottie is botuliform. Ripley is divisible. Englebert is divisible. All unlicensed people are virginal. If someone is divisible then they are botuliform. If someone is divisible then they are unlicensed. If Ripley is feathery and Ripley is filial then Ripley is divisible. If someone is unlicensed then they are feathery. If Darrin is unlicensed and Darrin is feathery then Darrin is divisible. Scottie is filial.", "logic": "\nVirginal(darrin)\nBotuliform(scottie)\nDivisible(ripley)\nDivisible(englebert)\nforall x (Unlicensed(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Divisible(x) -> Botuliform(x))\nforall x (Divisible(x) -> Unlicensed(x))\nFeathery(ripley) and Filial(ripley) -> Divisible(ripley)\nforall x (Unlicensed(x) -> Feathery(x))\nUnlicensed(darrin) and Feathery(darrin) -> Divisible(darrin)\n\nFilial(scottie)\n\nFilial(scottie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2322"} {"premises": "The rusty is unshaven. The mary numb the rusty. If the mary unstuff the rusty and the mary is unshaven then the rusty does not need the mary. If something is unapparent and it coquet the rusty then the rusty coquet the mary. If the rusty numb the mary then the rusty does not need the mary. If something is unshaven then it numb the mary. If something unstuff the rusty and it unstuff the mary then it is drugless. Round things are depictive. If something is depictive then it coquet the mary. If something numb the mary then it does not eat the rusty. The mary numb the rusty.", "logic": "\nUnshaven(rusty)\nNumb(mary, rusty)\nUnstuff(mary, rusty) and Unshaven(mary) -> not Coquet(rusty, mary)\nforall x (Unapparent(x) and Coquet(x, rusty) -> Coquet(rusty, mary))\nNumb(rusty, mary) -> not Coquet(rusty, mary)\nforall x (Unshaven(x) -> Numb(x, mary))\nforall x (Unstuff(x, rusty) and Unstuff(x, mary) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Depictive(x))\nforall x (Depictive(x) -> Coquet(x, mary))\nforall x (Numb(x, mary) -> not Numb(x, rusty))\n\nNumb(mary, rusty)\n\ntherefore Numb(mary, rusty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The virgil is enhancive. The joni relent the virgil. If the joni creosote the virgil and the joni is enhancive then the virgil does not need the joni. If something is dimmed and it iron the virgil then the virgil iron the joni. If the virgil relent the joni then the virgil does not need the joni. If something is enhancive then it relent the joni. If something creosote the virgil and it creosote the joni then it is metric. Round things are nonfissile. If something is nonfissile then it iron the joni. If something relent the joni then it does not eat the virgil. The joni does not eat the virgil.", "logic": "\nEnhancive(virgil)\nRelent(joni, virgil)\nCreosote(joni, virgil) and Enhancive(joni) -> not Iron(virgil, joni)\nforall x (Dimmed(x) and Iron(x, virgil) -> Iron(virgil, joni))\nRelent(virgil, joni) -> not Iron(virgil, joni)\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Relent(x, joni))\nforall x (Creosote(x, virgil) and Creosote(x, joni) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Damn(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Iron(x, joni))\nforall x (Relent(x, joni) -> not Relent(x, virgil))\n\nnot Relent(joni, virgil)\n\ntherefore Relent(joni, virgil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The christel is later. The fons airt the christel. If the fons defang the christel and the fons is later then the christel does not need the fons. If something is smallish and it ferret the christel then the christel ferret the fons. If the christel airt the fons then the christel does not need the fons. If something is later then it airt the fons. If something defang the christel and it defang the fons then it is pentagonal. Round things are unsaved. If something is unsaved then it ferret the fons. If something airt the fons then it does not eat the christel. The christel airt the fons.", "logic": "\nLater(christel)\nAirt(fons, christel)\nDefang(fons, christel) and Later(fons) -> not Ferret(christel, fons)\nforall x (Smallish(x) and Ferret(x, christel) -> Ferret(christel, fons))\nAirt(christel, fons) -> not Ferret(christel, fons)\nforall x (Later(x) -> Airt(x, fons))\nforall x (Defang(x, christel) and Defang(x, fons) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Unsaved(x))\nforall x (Unsaved(x) -> Ferret(x, fons))\nforall x (Airt(x, fons) -> not Airt(x, christel))\n\nAirt(christel, fons)\n\nLater(christel) and forall x (Later(x) -> Airt(x, fons)) -> therefore Airt(christel, fons)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The petrina is fluffy. The sheril inscribe the petrina. If the sheril rumple the petrina and the sheril is fluffy then the petrina does not need the sheril. If something is atheistic and it encumber the petrina then the petrina encumber the sheril. If the petrina inscribe the sheril then the petrina does not need the sheril. If something is fluffy then it inscribe the sheril. If something rumple the petrina and it rumple the sheril then it is voluptuous. Round things are chitinous. If something is chitinous then it encumber the sheril. If something inscribe the sheril then it does not eat the petrina. The petrina does not eat the sheril.", "logic": "\nFluffy(petrina)\nInscribe(sheril, petrina)\nRumple(sheril, petrina) and Fluffy(sheril) -> not Encumber(petrina, sheril)\nforall x (Atheistic(x) and Encumber(x, petrina) -> Encumber(petrina, sheril))\nInscribe(petrina, sheril) -> not Encumber(petrina, sheril)\nforall x (Fluffy(x) -> Inscribe(x, sheril))\nforall x (Rumple(x, petrina) and Rumple(x, sheril) -> Voluptuous(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) -> Chitinous(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> Encumber(x, sheril))\nforall x (Inscribe(x, sheril) -> not Inscribe(x, petrina))\n\nnot Inscribe(petrina, sheril)\n\nFluffy(petrina) and forall x (Fluffy(x) -> Inscribe(x, sheril)) -> therefore Inscribe(petrina, sheril)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The louis is adorned. The charis enchain the louis. If the charis derogate the louis and the charis is adorned then the louis does not need the charis. If something is eremitic and it paganise the louis then the louis paganise the charis. If the louis enchain the charis then the louis does not need the charis. If something is adorned then it enchain the charis. If something derogate the louis and it derogate the charis then it is unvaned. Round things are methodical. If something is methodical then it paganise the charis. If something enchain the charis then it does not eat the louis. The louis does not need the charis.", "logic": "\nAdorned(louis)\nEnchain(charis, louis)\nDerogate(charis, louis) and Adorned(charis) -> not Paganise(louis, charis)\nforall x (Eremitic(x) and Paganise(x, louis) -> Paganise(louis, charis))\nEnchain(louis, charis) -> not Paganise(louis, charis)\nforall x (Adorned(x) -> Enchain(x, charis))\nforall x (Derogate(x, louis) and Derogate(x, charis) -> Unvaned(x))\nforall x (Iodinated(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Paganise(x, charis))\nforall x (Enchain(x, charis) -> not Enchain(x, louis))\n\nnot Paganise(louis, charis)\n\nAdorned(louis) and forall x (Adorned(x) -> Enchain(x, charis)) -> therefore Enchain(louis, charis) Enchain(louis, charis) and Enchain(louis, charis) -> not Paganise(louis, charis) -> therefore not Paganise(louis, charis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The ellette is hifalutin. The jaquelin reclassify the ellette. If the jaquelin bawl the ellette and the jaquelin is hifalutin then the ellette does not need the jaquelin. If something is filled and it eddy the ellette then the ellette eddy the jaquelin. If the ellette reclassify the jaquelin then the ellette does not need the jaquelin. If something is hifalutin then it reclassify the jaquelin. If something bawl the ellette and it bawl the jaquelin then it is septic. Round things are unprovable. If something is unprovable then it eddy the jaquelin. If something reclassify the jaquelin then it does not eat the ellette. The ellette reclassify the ellette.", "logic": "\nHifalutin(ellette)\nReclassify(jaquelin, ellette)\nBawl(jaquelin, ellette) and Hifalutin(jaquelin) -> not Eddy(ellette, jaquelin)\nforall x (Filled(x) and Eddy(x, ellette) -> Eddy(ellette, jaquelin))\nReclassify(ellette, jaquelin) -> not Eddy(ellette, jaquelin)\nforall x (Hifalutin(x) -> Reclassify(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Bawl(x, ellette) and Bawl(x, jaquelin) -> Septic(x))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Unprovable(x))\nforall x (Unprovable(x) -> Eddy(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, jaquelin) -> not Reclassify(x, ellette))\n\nReclassify(ellette, ellette)\n\nHifalutin(ellette) and forall x (Hifalutin(x) -> Reclassify(x, jaquelin)) -> therefore Reclassify(ellette, jaquelin) Reclassify(ellette, jaquelin) and forall x (Reclassify(x, jaquelin) -> not Reclassify(x, ellette)) -> therefore not Reclassify(ellette, ellette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The rosalinde is racemose. The chariot traduce the rosalinde. If the chariot embrangle the rosalinde and the chariot is racemose then the rosalinde does not need the chariot. If something is molded and it power the rosalinde then the rosalinde power the chariot. If the rosalinde traduce the chariot then the rosalinde does not need the chariot. If something is racemose then it traduce the chariot. If something embrangle the rosalinde and it embrangle the chariot then it is cisalpine. Round things are horned. If something is horned then it power the chariot. If something traduce the chariot then it does not eat the rosalinde. The chariot is not cisalpine.", "logic": "\nRacemose(rosalinde)\nTraduce(chariot, rosalinde)\nEmbrangle(chariot, rosalinde) and Racemose(chariot) -> not Power(rosalinde, chariot)\nforall x (Molded(x) and Power(x, rosalinde) -> Power(rosalinde, chariot))\nTraduce(rosalinde, chariot) -> not Power(rosalinde, chariot)\nforall x (Racemose(x) -> Traduce(x, chariot))\nforall x (Embrangle(x, rosalinde) and Embrangle(x, chariot) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Horned(x) -> Power(x, chariot))\nforall x (Traduce(x, chariot) -> not Traduce(x, rosalinde))\n\nnot Cisalpine(chariot)\n\nforall x (Embrangle(x, rosalinde) and Embrangle(x, chariot) -> Cisalpine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The horatia is chafed. The claudine rhumba the horatia. If the claudine lard the horatia and the claudine is chafed then the horatia does not need the claudine. If something is oversized and it tantalize the horatia then the horatia tantalize the claudine. If the horatia rhumba the claudine then the horatia does not need the claudine. If something is chafed then it rhumba the claudine. If something lard the horatia and it lard the claudine then it is patronised. Round things are jesuitic. If something is jesuitic then it tantalize the claudine. If something rhumba the claudine then it does not eat the horatia. The horatia is jesuitic.", "logic": "\nChafed(horatia)\nRhumba(claudine, horatia)\nLard(claudine, horatia) and Chafed(claudine) -> not Tantalize(horatia, claudine)\nforall x (Oversized(x) and Tantalize(x, horatia) -> Tantalize(horatia, claudine))\nRhumba(horatia, claudine) -> not Tantalize(horatia, claudine)\nforall x (Chafed(x) -> Rhumba(x, claudine))\nforall x (Lard(x, horatia) and Lard(x, claudine) -> Patronised(x))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Jesuitic(x))\nforall x (Jesuitic(x) -> Tantalize(x, claudine))\nforall x (Rhumba(x, claudine) -> not Rhumba(x, horatia))\n\nJesuitic(horatia)\n\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Jesuitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The caty is automated. The paola record the caty. If the paola frequent the caty and the paola is automated then the caty does not need the paola. If something is nonthermal and it chock the caty then the caty chock the paola. If the caty record the paola then the caty does not need the paola. If something is automated then it record the paola. If something frequent the caty and it frequent the paola then it is finable. Round things are apiarian. If something is apiarian then it chock the paola. If something record the paola then it does not eat the caty. The caty is not finable.", "logic": "\nAutomated(caty)\nRecord(paola, caty)\nFrequent(paola, caty) and Automated(paola) -> not Chock(caty, paola)\nforall x (Nonthermal(x) and Chock(x, caty) -> Chock(caty, paola))\nRecord(caty, paola) -> not Chock(caty, paola)\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Record(x, paola))\nforall x (Frequent(x, caty) and Frequent(x, paola) -> Finable(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Apiarian(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) -> Chock(x, paola))\nforall x (Record(x, paola) -> not Record(x, caty))\n\nnot Finable(caty)\n\nforall x (Frequent(x, caty) and Frequent(x, paola) -> Finable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The danie is spastic. The gerianne vitiate the danie. If the gerianne prostitute the danie and the gerianne is spastic then the danie does not need the gerianne. If something is operant and it donate the danie then the danie donate the gerianne. If the danie vitiate the gerianne then the danie does not need the gerianne. If something is spastic then it vitiate the gerianne. If something prostitute the danie and it prostitute the gerianne then it is enzymatic. Round things are snafu. If something is snafu then it donate the gerianne. If something vitiate the gerianne then it does not eat the danie. The danie is operant.", "logic": "\nSpastic(danie)\nVitiate(gerianne, danie)\nProstitute(gerianne, danie) and Spastic(gerianne) -> not Donate(danie, gerianne)\nforall x (Operant(x) and Donate(x, danie) -> Donate(danie, gerianne))\nVitiate(danie, gerianne) -> not Donate(danie, gerianne)\nforall x (Spastic(x) -> Vitiate(x, gerianne))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, danie) and Prostitute(x, gerianne) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Foolish(x) -> Snafu(x))\nforall x (Snafu(x) -> Donate(x, gerianne))\nforall x (Vitiate(x, gerianne) -> not Vitiate(x, danie))\n\nOperant(danie)\n\nOperant(danie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The darcey is blamed. The kameko adjust the darcey. If the kameko ennoble the darcey and the kameko is blamed then the darcey does not need the kameko. If something is florentine and it object the darcey then the darcey object the kameko. If the darcey adjust the kameko then the darcey does not need the kameko. If something is blamed then it adjust the kameko. If something ennoble the darcey and it ennoble the kameko then it is barbed. Round things are unplanned. If something is unplanned then it object the kameko. If something adjust the kameko then it does not eat the darcey. The darcey does not visit the kameko.", "logic": "\nBlamed(darcey)\nAdjust(kameko, darcey)\nEnnoble(kameko, darcey) and Blamed(kameko) -> not Object(darcey, kameko)\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Object(x, darcey) -> Object(darcey, kameko))\nAdjust(darcey, kameko) -> not Object(darcey, kameko)\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Adjust(x, kameko))\nforall x (Ennoble(x, darcey) and Ennoble(x, kameko) -> Barbed(x))\nforall x (Cephalic(x) -> Unplanned(x))\nforall x (Unplanned(x) -> Object(x, kameko))\nforall x (Adjust(x, kameko) -> not Adjust(x, darcey))\n\nnot Ennoble(darcey, kameko)\n\nnot Ennoble(darcey, kameko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The tierney is orbitual. The nannette roast the tierney. If the nannette opacify the tierney and the nannette is orbitual then the tierney does not need the nannette. If something is miserly and it harp the tierney then the tierney harp the nannette. If the tierney roast the nannette then the tierney does not need the nannette. If something is orbitual then it roast the nannette. If something opacify the tierney and it opacify the nannette then it is humanistic. Round things are relocated. If something is relocated then it harp the nannette. If something roast the nannette then it does not eat the tierney. The tierney opacify the tierney.", "logic": "\nOrbitual(tierney)\nRoast(nannette, tierney)\nOpacify(nannette, tierney) and Orbitual(nannette) -> not Harp(tierney, nannette)\nforall x (Miserly(x) and Harp(x, tierney) -> Harp(tierney, nannette))\nRoast(tierney, nannette) -> not Harp(tierney, nannette)\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Roast(x, nannette))\nforall x (Opacify(x, tierney) and Opacify(x, nannette) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) -> Relocated(x))\nforall x (Relocated(x) -> Harp(x, nannette))\nforall x (Roast(x, nannette) -> not Roast(x, tierney))\n\nOpacify(tierney, tierney)\n\nOpacify(tierney, tierney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-246"} {"premises": "The rick reward the beverlie. The rick is testy. The rick is lissome. The beverlie is testy. The beverlie is not lissome. The beverlie dabble the rick. The beverlie titivate the rick. If the rick dabble the beverlie and the beverlie is not testy then the rick is lissome. If the rick dabble the beverlie then the rick is lissome. If someone dabble the rick then the rick dabble the beverlie. If the beverlie titivate the rick and the beverlie does not like the rick then the rick dabble the beverlie. If someone dabble the rick and the rick does not like the beverlie then the beverlie is nitrous. If someone is lissome and they do not chase the beverlie then they chase the rick. If someone dabble the rick and they are not nitrous then they are lissome. If someone dabble the beverlie and the beverlie is not lissome then they need the beverlie. The beverlie is testy.", "logic": "\nReward(rick, beverlie)\nTesty(rick)\nLissome(rick)\nTesty(beverlie)\nnot Lissome(beverlie)\nDabble(beverlie, rick)\nTitivate(beverlie, rick)\nDabble(rick, beverlie) and not Testy(beverlie) -> Lissome(rick)\nDabble(rick, beverlie) -> Lissome(rick)\nforall x (Dabble(x, rick) -> Dabble(rick, beverlie))\nTitivate(beverlie, rick) and not Dabble(beverlie, rick) -> Dabble(rick, beverlie)\nforall x (Dabble(x, rick) and not Dabble(rick, beverlie) -> Nitrous(beverlie))\nforall x (Lissome(x) and not Reward(x, beverlie) -> Reward(x, rick))\nforall x (Dabble(x, rick) and not Nitrous(x) -> Lissome(x))\nforall x (Dabble(x, beverlie) and not Lissome(beverlie) -> Titivate(x, beverlie))\n\nTesty(beverlie)\n\ntherefore Testy(beverlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The alexei pressurise the aura. The alexei is tutorial. The alexei is ignitable. The aura is tutorial. The aura is not ignitable. The aura delimit the alexei. The aura unite the alexei. If the alexei delimit the aura and the aura is not tutorial then the alexei is ignitable. If the alexei delimit the aura then the alexei is ignitable. If someone delimit the alexei then the alexei delimit the aura. If the aura unite the alexei and the aura does not like the alexei then the alexei delimit the aura. If someone delimit the alexei and the alexei does not like the aura then the aura is deboned. If someone is ignitable and they do not chase the aura then they chase the alexei. If someone delimit the alexei and they are not deboned then they are ignitable. If someone delimit the aura and the aura is not ignitable then they need the aura. The aura does not need the alexei.", "logic": "\nPressurise(alexei, aura)\nTutorial(alexei)\nIgnitable(alexei)\nTutorial(aura)\nnot Ignitable(aura)\nDelimit(aura, alexei)\nUnite(aura, alexei)\nDelimit(alexei, aura) and not Tutorial(aura) -> Ignitable(alexei)\nDelimit(alexei, aura) -> Ignitable(alexei)\nforall x (Delimit(x, alexei) -> Delimit(alexei, aura))\nUnite(aura, alexei) and not Delimit(aura, alexei) -> Delimit(alexei, aura)\nforall x (Delimit(x, alexei) and not Delimit(alexei, aura) -> Deboned(aura))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and not Pressurise(x, aura) -> Pressurise(x, alexei))\nforall x (Delimit(x, alexei) and not Deboned(x) -> Ignitable(x))\nforall x (Delimit(x, aura) and not Ignitable(aura) -> Unite(x, aura))\n\nnot Unite(aura, alexei)\n\ntherefore Unite(aura, alexei)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The maxim parse the adolphe. The maxim is adaptive. The maxim is late. The adolphe is adaptive. The adolphe is not late. The adolphe amerce the maxim. The adolphe curtsy the maxim. If the maxim amerce the adolphe and the adolphe is not adaptive then the maxim is late. If the maxim amerce the adolphe then the maxim is late. If someone amerce the maxim then the maxim amerce the adolphe. If the adolphe curtsy the maxim and the adolphe does not like the maxim then the maxim amerce the adolphe. If someone amerce the maxim and the maxim does not like the adolphe then the adolphe is unequalled. If someone is late and they do not chase the adolphe then they chase the maxim. If someone amerce the maxim and they are not unequalled then they are late. If someone amerce the adolphe and the adolphe is not late then they need the adolphe. The maxim amerce the adolphe.", "logic": "\nParse(maxim, adolphe)\nAdaptive(maxim)\nLate(maxim)\nAdaptive(adolphe)\nnot Late(adolphe)\nAmerce(adolphe, maxim)\nCurtsy(adolphe, maxim)\nAmerce(maxim, adolphe) and not Adaptive(adolphe) -> Late(maxim)\nAmerce(maxim, adolphe) -> Late(maxim)\nforall x (Amerce(x, maxim) -> Amerce(maxim, adolphe))\nCurtsy(adolphe, maxim) and not Amerce(adolphe, maxim) -> Amerce(maxim, adolphe)\nforall x (Amerce(x, maxim) and not Amerce(maxim, adolphe) -> Unequalled(adolphe))\nforall x (Late(x) and not Parse(x, adolphe) -> Parse(x, maxim))\nforall x (Amerce(x, maxim) and not Unequalled(x) -> Late(x))\nforall x (Amerce(x, adolphe) and not Late(adolphe) -> Curtsy(x, adolphe))\n\nAmerce(maxim, adolphe)\n\nAmerce(adolphe, maxim) and forall x (Amerce(x, maxim) -> Amerce(maxim, adolphe)) -> therefore Amerce(maxim, adolphe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The giordano recant the thorndike. The giordano is hateful. The giordano is configured. The thorndike is hateful. The thorndike is not configured. The thorndike delay the giordano. The thorndike tend the giordano. If the giordano delay the thorndike and the thorndike is not hateful then the giordano is configured. If the giordano delay the thorndike then the giordano is configured. If someone delay the giordano then the giordano delay the thorndike. If the thorndike tend the giordano and the thorndike does not like the giordano then the giordano delay the thorndike. If someone delay the giordano and the giordano does not like the thorndike then the thorndike is reborn. If someone is configured and they do not chase the thorndike then they chase the giordano. If someone delay the giordano and they are not reborn then they are configured. If someone delay the thorndike and the thorndike is not configured then they need the thorndike. The giordano does not like the thorndike.", "logic": "\nRecant(giordano, thorndike)\nHateful(giordano)\nConfigured(giordano)\nHateful(thorndike)\nnot Configured(thorndike)\nDelay(thorndike, giordano)\nTend(thorndike, giordano)\nDelay(giordano, thorndike) and not Hateful(thorndike) -> Configured(giordano)\nDelay(giordano, thorndike) -> Configured(giordano)\nforall x (Delay(x, giordano) -> Delay(giordano, thorndike))\nTend(thorndike, giordano) and not Delay(thorndike, giordano) -> Delay(giordano, thorndike)\nforall x (Delay(x, giordano) and not Delay(giordano, thorndike) -> Reborn(thorndike))\nforall x (Configured(x) and not Recant(x, thorndike) -> Recant(x, giordano))\nforall x (Delay(x, giordano) and not Reborn(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Delay(x, thorndike) and not Configured(thorndike) -> Tend(x, thorndike))\n\nnot Delay(giordano, thorndike)\n\nDelay(thorndike, giordano) and forall x (Delay(x, giordano) -> Delay(giordano, thorndike)) -> therefore Delay(giordano, thorndike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The melonie fritter the viv. The melonie is ringlike. The melonie is nodular. The viv is ringlike. The viv is not nodular. The viv bespatter the melonie. The viv inset the melonie. If the melonie bespatter the viv and the viv is not ringlike then the melonie is nodular. If the melonie bespatter the viv then the melonie is nodular. If someone bespatter the melonie then the melonie bespatter the viv. If the viv inset the melonie and the viv does not like the melonie then the melonie bespatter the viv. If someone bespatter the melonie and the melonie does not like the viv then the viv is alchemical. If someone is nodular and they do not chase the viv then they chase the melonie. If someone bespatter the melonie and they are not alchemical then they are nodular. If someone bespatter the viv and the viv is not nodular then they need the viv. The melonie inset the viv.", "logic": "\nFritter(melonie, viv)\nRinglike(melonie)\nNodular(melonie)\nRinglike(viv)\nnot Nodular(viv)\nBespatter(viv, melonie)\nInset(viv, melonie)\nBespatter(melonie, viv) and not Ringlike(viv) -> Nodular(melonie)\nBespatter(melonie, viv) -> Nodular(melonie)\nforall x (Bespatter(x, melonie) -> Bespatter(melonie, viv))\nInset(viv, melonie) and not Bespatter(viv, melonie) -> Bespatter(melonie, viv)\nforall x (Bespatter(x, melonie) and not Bespatter(melonie, viv) -> Alchemical(viv))\nforall x (Nodular(x) and not Fritter(x, viv) -> Fritter(x, melonie))\nforall x (Bespatter(x, melonie) and not Alchemical(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Bespatter(x, viv) and not Nodular(viv) -> Inset(x, viv))\n\nInset(melonie, viv)\n\nBespatter(viv, melonie) and forall x (Bespatter(x, melonie) -> Bespatter(melonie, viv)) -> therefore Bespatter(melonie, viv) Bespatter(melonie, viv) and not Nodular(viv) and forall x (Bespatter(x, viv) and not Nodular(viv) -> Inset(x, viv)) -> therefore Inset(melonie, viv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The ortensia confect the legra. The ortensia is polyglot. The ortensia is flexile. The legra is polyglot. The legra is not flexile. The legra skim the ortensia. The legra recurve the ortensia. If the ortensia skim the legra and the legra is not polyglot then the ortensia is flexile. If the ortensia skim the legra then the ortensia is flexile. If someone skim the ortensia then the ortensia skim the legra. If the legra recurve the ortensia and the legra does not like the ortensia then the ortensia skim the legra. If someone skim the ortensia and the ortensia does not like the legra then the legra is slummy. If someone is flexile and they do not chase the legra then they chase the ortensia. If someone skim the ortensia and they are not slummy then they are flexile. If someone skim the legra and the legra is not flexile then they need the legra. The ortensia does not need the legra.", "logic": "\nConfect(ortensia, legra)\nPolyglot(ortensia)\nFlexile(ortensia)\nPolyglot(legra)\nnot Flexile(legra)\nSkim(legra, ortensia)\nRecurve(legra, ortensia)\nSkim(ortensia, legra) and not Polyglot(legra) -> Flexile(ortensia)\nSkim(ortensia, legra) -> Flexile(ortensia)\nforall x (Skim(x, ortensia) -> Skim(ortensia, legra))\nRecurve(legra, ortensia) and not Skim(legra, ortensia) -> Skim(ortensia, legra)\nforall x (Skim(x, ortensia) and not Skim(ortensia, legra) -> Slummy(legra))\nforall x (Flexile(x) and not Confect(x, legra) -> Confect(x, ortensia))\nforall x (Skim(x, ortensia) and not Slummy(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Skim(x, legra) and not Flexile(legra) -> Recurve(x, legra))\n\nnot Recurve(ortensia, legra)\n\nSkim(legra, ortensia) and forall x (Skim(x, ortensia) -> Skim(ortensia, legra)) -> therefore Skim(ortensia, legra) Skim(ortensia, legra) and not Flexile(legra) and forall x (Skim(x, legra) and not Flexile(legra) -> Recurve(x, legra)) -> therefore Recurve(ortensia, legra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The rick demobilise the ginni. The rick is quarterly. The rick is purulent. The ginni is quarterly. The ginni is not purulent. The ginni shack the rick. The ginni bullshit the rick. If the rick shack the ginni and the ginni is not quarterly then the rick is purulent. If the rick shack the ginni then the rick is purulent. If someone shack the rick then the rick shack the ginni. If the ginni bullshit the rick and the ginni does not like the rick then the rick shack the ginni. If someone shack the rick and the rick does not like the ginni then the ginni is feisty. If someone is purulent and they do not chase the ginni then they chase the rick. If someone shack the rick and they are not feisty then they are purulent. If someone shack the ginni and the ginni is not purulent then they need the ginni. The ginni does not chase the rick.", "logic": "\nDemobilise(rick, ginni)\nQuarterly(rick)\nPurulent(rick)\nQuarterly(ginni)\nnot Purulent(ginni)\nShack(ginni, rick)\nBullshit(ginni, rick)\nShack(rick, ginni) and not Quarterly(ginni) -> Purulent(rick)\nShack(rick, ginni) -> Purulent(rick)\nforall x (Shack(x, rick) -> Shack(rick, ginni))\nBullshit(ginni, rick) and not Shack(ginni, rick) -> Shack(rick, ginni)\nforall x (Shack(x, rick) and not Shack(rick, ginni) -> Feisty(ginni))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and not Demobilise(x, ginni) -> Demobilise(x, rick))\nforall x (Shack(x, rick) and not Feisty(x) -> Purulent(x))\nforall x (Shack(x, ginni) and not Purulent(ginni) -> Bullshit(x, ginni))\n\nnot Demobilise(ginni, rick)\n\nforall x (Purulent(x) and not Demobilise(x, ginni) -> Demobilise(x, rick)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The flory moonshine the audrye. The flory is metallike. The flory is romanian. The audrye is metallike. The audrye is not romanian. The audrye deign the flory. The audrye plagiarise the flory. If the flory deign the audrye and the audrye is not metallike then the flory is romanian. If the flory deign the audrye then the flory is romanian. If someone deign the flory then the flory deign the audrye. If the audrye plagiarise the flory and the audrye does not like the flory then the flory deign the audrye. If someone deign the flory and the flory does not like the audrye then the audrye is rocky. If someone is romanian and they do not chase the audrye then they chase the flory. If someone deign the flory and they are not rocky then they are romanian. If someone deign the audrye and the audrye is not romanian then they need the audrye. The audrye is rocky.", "logic": "\nMoonshine(flory, audrye)\nMetallike(flory)\nRomanian(flory)\nMetallike(audrye)\nnot Romanian(audrye)\nDeign(audrye, flory)\nPlagiarise(audrye, flory)\nDeign(flory, audrye) and not Metallike(audrye) -> Romanian(flory)\nDeign(flory, audrye) -> Romanian(flory)\nforall x (Deign(x, flory) -> Deign(flory, audrye))\nPlagiarise(audrye, flory) and not Deign(audrye, flory) -> Deign(flory, audrye)\nforall x (Deign(x, flory) and not Deign(flory, audrye) -> Rocky(audrye))\nforall x (Romanian(x) and not Moonshine(x, audrye) -> Moonshine(x, flory))\nforall x (Deign(x, flory) and not Rocky(x) -> Romanian(x))\nforall x (Deign(x, audrye) and not Romanian(audrye) -> Plagiarise(x, audrye))\n\nRocky(audrye)\n\nforall x (Deign(x, flory) and not Deign(flory, audrye) -> Rocky(audrye)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The marcel taunt the silvana. The marcel is invaluable. The marcel is musing. The silvana is invaluable. The silvana is not musing. The silvana cluck the marcel. The silvana revivify the marcel. If the marcel cluck the silvana and the silvana is not invaluable then the marcel is musing. If the marcel cluck the silvana then the marcel is musing. If someone cluck the marcel then the marcel cluck the silvana. If the silvana revivify the marcel and the silvana does not like the marcel then the marcel cluck the silvana. If someone cluck the marcel and the marcel does not like the silvana then the silvana is clogged. If someone is musing and they do not chase the silvana then they chase the marcel. If someone cluck the marcel and they are not clogged then they are musing. If someone cluck the silvana and the silvana is not musing then they need the silvana. The marcel does not chase the marcel.", "logic": "\nTaunt(marcel, silvana)\nInvaluable(marcel)\nMusing(marcel)\nInvaluable(silvana)\nnot Musing(silvana)\nCluck(silvana, marcel)\nRevivify(silvana, marcel)\nCluck(marcel, silvana) and not Invaluable(silvana) -> Musing(marcel)\nCluck(marcel, silvana) -> Musing(marcel)\nforall x (Cluck(x, marcel) -> Cluck(marcel, silvana))\nRevivify(silvana, marcel) and not Cluck(silvana, marcel) -> Cluck(marcel, silvana)\nforall x (Cluck(x, marcel) and not Cluck(marcel, silvana) -> Clogged(silvana))\nforall x (Musing(x) and not Taunt(x, silvana) -> Taunt(x, marcel))\nforall x (Cluck(x, marcel) and not Clogged(x) -> Musing(x))\nforall x (Cluck(x, silvana) and not Musing(silvana) -> Revivify(x, silvana))\n\nnot Taunt(marcel, marcel)\n\nforall x (Musing(x) and not Taunt(x, silvana) -> Taunt(x, marcel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The evie squeak the tuck. The evie is difficult. The evie is unfueled. The tuck is difficult. The tuck is not unfueled. The tuck spotlight the evie. The tuck benday the evie. If the evie spotlight the tuck and the tuck is not difficult then the evie is unfueled. If the evie spotlight the tuck then the evie is unfueled. If someone spotlight the evie then the evie spotlight the tuck. If the tuck benday the evie and the tuck does not like the evie then the evie spotlight the tuck. If someone spotlight the evie and the evie does not like the tuck then the tuck is hesitant. If someone is unfueled and they do not chase the tuck then they chase the evie. If someone spotlight the evie and they are not hesitant then they are unfueled. If someone spotlight the tuck and the tuck is not unfueled then they need the tuck. The evie spotlight the evie.", "logic": "\nSqueak(evie, tuck)\nDifficult(evie)\nUnfueled(evie)\nDifficult(tuck)\nnot Unfueled(tuck)\nSpotlight(tuck, evie)\nBenday(tuck, evie)\nSpotlight(evie, tuck) and not Difficult(tuck) -> Unfueled(evie)\nSpotlight(evie, tuck) -> Unfueled(evie)\nforall x (Spotlight(x, evie) -> Spotlight(evie, tuck))\nBenday(tuck, evie) and not Spotlight(tuck, evie) -> Spotlight(evie, tuck)\nforall x (Spotlight(x, evie) and not Spotlight(evie, tuck) -> Hesitant(tuck))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and not Squeak(x, tuck) -> Squeak(x, evie))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, evie) and not Hesitant(x) -> Unfueled(x))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, tuck) and not Unfueled(tuck) -> Benday(x, tuck))\n\nSpotlight(evie, evie)\n\nSpotlight(evie, evie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The olly kitten the rollin. The olly is spunky. The olly is aplacental. The rollin is spunky. The rollin is not aplacental. The rollin homestead the olly. The rollin denigrate the olly. If the olly homestead the rollin and the rollin is not spunky then the olly is aplacental. If the olly homestead the rollin then the olly is aplacental. If someone homestead the olly then the olly homestead the rollin. If the rollin denigrate the olly and the rollin does not like the olly then the olly homestead the rollin. If someone homestead the olly and the olly does not like the rollin then the rollin is lancinate. If someone is aplacental and they do not chase the rollin then they chase the olly. If someone homestead the olly and they are not lancinate then they are aplacental. If someone homestead the rollin and the rollin is not aplacental then they need the rollin. The olly is not blue.", "logic": "\nKitten(olly, rollin)\nSpunky(olly)\nAplacental(olly)\nSpunky(rollin)\nnot Aplacental(rollin)\nHomestead(rollin, olly)\nDenigrate(rollin, olly)\nHomestead(olly, rollin) and not Spunky(rollin) -> Aplacental(olly)\nHomestead(olly, rollin) -> Aplacental(olly)\nforall x (Homestead(x, olly) -> Homestead(olly, rollin))\nDenigrate(rollin, olly) and not Homestead(rollin, olly) -> Homestead(olly, rollin)\nforall x (Homestead(x, olly) and not Homestead(olly, rollin) -> Lancinate(rollin))\nforall x (Aplacental(x) and not Kitten(x, rollin) -> Kitten(x, olly))\nforall x (Homestead(x, olly) and not Lancinate(x) -> Aplacental(x))\nforall x (Homestead(x, rollin) and not Aplacental(rollin) -> Denigrate(x, rollin))\n\nnot Blue(olly)\n\nnot Blue(olly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The kessiah redden the eda. The kessiah is unfading. The kessiah is eparchial. The eda is unfading. The eda is not eparchial. The eda erect the kessiah. The eda avouch the kessiah. If the kessiah erect the eda and the eda is not unfading then the kessiah is eparchial. If the kessiah erect the eda then the kessiah is eparchial. If someone erect the kessiah then the kessiah erect the eda. If the eda avouch the kessiah and the eda does not like the kessiah then the kessiah erect the eda. If someone erect the kessiah and the kessiah does not like the eda then the eda is mesodermal. If someone is eparchial and they do not chase the eda then they chase the kessiah. If someone erect the kessiah and they are not mesodermal then they are eparchial. If someone erect the eda and the eda is not eparchial then they need the eda. The eda erect the eda.", "logic": "\nRedden(kessiah, eda)\nUnfading(kessiah)\nEparchial(kessiah)\nUnfading(eda)\nnot Eparchial(eda)\nErect(eda, kessiah)\nAvouch(eda, kessiah)\nErect(kessiah, eda) and not Unfading(eda) -> Eparchial(kessiah)\nErect(kessiah, eda) -> Eparchial(kessiah)\nforall x (Erect(x, kessiah) -> Erect(kessiah, eda))\nAvouch(eda, kessiah) and not Erect(eda, kessiah) -> Erect(kessiah, eda)\nforall x (Erect(x, kessiah) and not Erect(kessiah, eda) -> Mesodermal(eda))\nforall x (Eparchial(x) and not Redden(x, eda) -> Redden(x, kessiah))\nforall x (Erect(x, kessiah) and not Mesodermal(x) -> Eparchial(x))\nforall x (Erect(x, eda) and not Eparchial(eda) -> Avouch(x, eda))\n\nErect(eda, eda)\n\nErect(eda, eda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The demetria is pelvic. The stevena is thorny. The stevena is not pelvic. The stevena is successive. The linnet is pelvic. The linnet summerize the stevena. The linnet obstruct the stevena. The karlotta is preventive. The karlotta is pelvic. The karlotta obstruct the demetria. The karlotta obstruct the stevena. The karlotta does not visit the linnet. If someone obstruct the demetria then the demetria obstruct the linnet. Big people are cruddy. Round people are not successive. The karlotta obstruct the stevena.", "logic": "\nPelvic(demetria)\nThorny(stevena)\nnot Pelvic(stevena)\nSuccessive(stevena)\nPelvic(linnet)\nSummerize(linnet, stevena)\nObstruct(linnet, stevena)\nPreventive(karlotta)\nPelvic(karlotta)\nObstruct(karlotta, demetria)\nObstruct(karlotta, stevena)\nnot Obstruct(karlotta, linnet)\nforall x (Obstruct(x, demetria) -> Obstruct(demetria, linnet))\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Cruddy(x) -> not Successive(x))\n\nObstruct(karlotta, stevena)\n\ntherefore Obstruct(karlotta, stevena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The agustin is pernicious. The lucian is irrelevant. The lucian is not pernicious. The lucian is dalmatian. The korella is pernicious. The korella harness the lucian. The korella rupture the lucian. The veronike is abusive. The veronike is pernicious. The veronike rupture the agustin. The veronike rupture the lucian. The veronike does not visit the korella. If someone rupture the agustin then the agustin rupture the korella. Big people are pedestrian. Round people are not dalmatian. The korella is not pernicious.", "logic": "\nPernicious(agustin)\nIrrelevant(lucian)\nnot Pernicious(lucian)\nDalmatian(lucian)\nPernicious(korella)\nHarness(korella, lucian)\nRupture(korella, lucian)\nAbusive(veronike)\nPernicious(veronike)\nRupture(veronike, agustin)\nRupture(veronike, lucian)\nnot Rupture(veronike, korella)\nforall x (Rupture(x, agustin) -> Rupture(agustin, korella))\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> not Dalmatian(x))\n\nnot Pernicious(korella)\n\ntherefore Pernicious(korella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The yank is unblinking. The inez is slummy. The inez is not unblinking. The inez is impeding. The britaney is unblinking. The britaney abseil the inez. The britaney stifle the inez. The guinevere is bouldery. The guinevere is unblinking. The guinevere stifle the yank. The guinevere stifle the inez. The guinevere does not visit the britaney. If someone stifle the yank then the yank stifle the britaney. Big people are unattired. Round people are not impeding. The yank stifle the britaney.", "logic": "\nUnblinking(yank)\nSlummy(inez)\nnot Unblinking(inez)\nImpeding(inez)\nUnblinking(britaney)\nAbseil(britaney, inez)\nStifle(britaney, inez)\nBouldery(guinevere)\nUnblinking(guinevere)\nStifle(guinevere, yank)\nStifle(guinevere, inez)\nnot Stifle(guinevere, britaney)\nforall x (Stifle(x, yank) -> Stifle(yank, britaney))\nforall x (Bouldery(x) -> Unattired(x))\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> not Impeding(x))\n\nStifle(yank, britaney)\n\nStifle(guinevere, yank) and forall x (Stifle(x, yank) -> Stifle(yank, britaney)) -> therefore Stifle(yank, britaney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The eleni is shrinkable. The leonid is beginning. The leonid is not shrinkable. The leonid is olfactory. The elvira is shrinkable. The elvira barrel the leonid. The elvira serrate the leonid. The kata is joint. The kata is shrinkable. The kata serrate the eleni. The kata serrate the leonid. The kata does not visit the elvira. If someone serrate the eleni then the eleni serrate the elvira. Big people are torrid. Round people are not olfactory. The kata is not torrid.", "logic": "\nShrinkable(eleni)\nBeginning(leonid)\nnot Shrinkable(leonid)\nOlfactory(leonid)\nShrinkable(elvira)\nBarrel(elvira, leonid)\nSerrate(elvira, leonid)\nJoint(kata)\nShrinkable(kata)\nSerrate(kata, eleni)\nSerrate(kata, leonid)\nnot Serrate(kata, elvira)\nforall x (Serrate(x, eleni) -> Serrate(eleni, elvira))\nforall x (Joint(x) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Torrid(x) -> not Olfactory(x))\n\nnot Torrid(kata)\n\nJoint(kata) and forall x (Joint(x) -> Torrid(x)) -> therefore Torrid(kata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The yardley is unassuming. The peg is planted. The peg is not unassuming. The peg is dighted. The merridie is unassuming. The merridie confuse the peg. The merridie rein the peg. The eolande is moresque. The eolande is unassuming. The eolande rein the yardley. The eolande rein the peg. The eolande does not visit the merridie. If someone rein the yardley then the yardley rein the merridie. Big people are transpolar. Round people are not dighted. The eolande is not dighted.", "logic": "\nUnassuming(yardley)\nPlanted(peg)\nnot Unassuming(peg)\nDighted(peg)\nUnassuming(merridie)\nConfuse(merridie, peg)\nRein(merridie, peg)\nMoresque(eolande)\nUnassuming(eolande)\nRein(eolande, yardley)\nRein(eolande, peg)\nnot Rein(eolande, merridie)\nforall x (Rein(x, yardley) -> Rein(yardley, merridie))\nforall x (Moresque(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> not Dighted(x))\n\nnot Dighted(eolande)\n\nMoresque(eolande) and forall x (Moresque(x) -> Transpolar(x)) -> therefore Transpolar(eolande) Transpolar(eolande) and forall x (Transpolar(x) -> not Dighted(x)) -> therefore not Dighted(eolande)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The aubrie is perianal. The henryetta is indisposed. The henryetta is not perianal. The henryetta is innumerate. The kareem is perianal. The kareem witch the henryetta. The kareem evolve the henryetta. The leslie is guardant. The leslie is perianal. The leslie evolve the aubrie. The leslie evolve the henryetta. The leslie does not visit the kareem. If someone evolve the aubrie then the aubrie evolve the kareem. Big people are nettled. Round people are not innumerate. The leslie is innumerate.", "logic": "\nPerianal(aubrie)\nIndisposed(henryetta)\nnot Perianal(henryetta)\nInnumerate(henryetta)\nPerianal(kareem)\nWitch(kareem, henryetta)\nEvolve(kareem, henryetta)\nGuardant(leslie)\nPerianal(leslie)\nEvolve(leslie, aubrie)\nEvolve(leslie, henryetta)\nnot Evolve(leslie, kareem)\nforall x (Evolve(x, aubrie) -> Evolve(aubrie, kareem))\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Nettled(x))\nforall x (Nettled(x) -> not Innumerate(x))\n\nInnumerate(leslie)\n\nGuardant(leslie) and forall x (Guardant(x) -> Nettled(x)) -> therefore Nettled(leslie) Nettled(leslie) and forall x (Nettled(x) -> not Innumerate(x)) -> therefore not Innumerate(leslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The marisa is unlobed. The fabrice is tailless. The fabrice is not unlobed. The fabrice is inlaid. The leontyne is unlobed. The leontyne bituminize the fabrice. The leontyne read the fabrice. The leda is perversive. The leda is unlobed. The leda read the marisa. The leda read the fabrice. The leda does not visit the leontyne. If someone read the marisa then the marisa read the leontyne. Big people are surd. Round people are not inlaid. The fabrice is not surd.", "logic": "\nUnlobed(marisa)\nTailless(fabrice)\nnot Unlobed(fabrice)\nInlaid(fabrice)\nUnlobed(leontyne)\nBituminize(leontyne, fabrice)\nRead(leontyne, fabrice)\nPerversive(leda)\nUnlobed(leda)\nRead(leda, marisa)\nRead(leda, fabrice)\nnot Read(leda, leontyne)\nforall x (Read(x, marisa) -> Read(marisa, leontyne))\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Surd(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) -> not Inlaid(x))\n\nnot Surd(fabrice)\n\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Surd(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The eden is amniotic. The noam is rising. The noam is not amniotic. The noam is drunken. The dionis is amniotic. The dionis unlearn the noam. The dionis disorder the noam. The lonee is tinseled. The lonee is amniotic. The lonee disorder the eden. The lonee disorder the noam. The lonee does not visit the dionis. If someone disorder the eden then the eden disorder the dionis. Big people are brushlike. Round people are not drunken. The dionis is brushlike.", "logic": "\nAmniotic(eden)\nRising(noam)\nnot Amniotic(noam)\nDrunken(noam)\nAmniotic(dionis)\nUnlearn(dionis, noam)\nDisorder(dionis, noam)\nTinseled(lonee)\nAmniotic(lonee)\nDisorder(lonee, eden)\nDisorder(lonee, noam)\nnot Disorder(lonee, dionis)\nforall x (Disorder(x, eden) -> Disorder(eden, dionis))\nforall x (Tinseled(x) -> Brushlike(x))\nforall x (Brushlike(x) -> not Drunken(x))\n\nBrushlike(dionis)\n\nforall x (Tinseled(x) -> Brushlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The willetta is imperious. The michele is inartistic. The michele is not imperious. The michele is roughdried. The othella is imperious. The othella indispose the michele. The othella drudge the michele. The maiga is unlicensed. The maiga is imperious. The maiga drudge the willetta. The maiga drudge the michele. The maiga does not visit the othella. If someone drudge the willetta then the willetta drudge the othella. Big people are uncurbed. Round people are not roughdried. The willetta is not uncurbed.", "logic": "\nImperious(willetta)\nInartistic(michele)\nnot Imperious(michele)\nRoughdried(michele)\nImperious(othella)\nIndispose(othella, michele)\nDrudge(othella, michele)\nUnlicensed(maiga)\nImperious(maiga)\nDrudge(maiga, willetta)\nDrudge(maiga, michele)\nnot Drudge(maiga, othella)\nforall x (Drudge(x, willetta) -> Drudge(willetta, othella))\nforall x (Unlicensed(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) -> not Roughdried(x))\n\nnot Uncurbed(willetta)\n\nforall x (Unlicensed(x) -> Uncurbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The myrlene is wishful. The yancey is wasted. The yancey is not wishful. The yancey is alfresco. The corly is wishful. The corly unclip the yancey. The corly causeway the yancey. The jamie is lacking. The jamie is wishful. The jamie causeway the myrlene. The jamie causeway the yancey. The jamie does not visit the corly. If someone causeway the myrlene then the myrlene causeway the corly. Big people are worthful. Round people are not alfresco. The myrlene needs the myrlene.", "logic": "\nWishful(myrlene)\nWasted(yancey)\nnot Wishful(yancey)\nAlfresco(yancey)\nWishful(corly)\nUnclip(corly, yancey)\nCauseway(corly, yancey)\nLacking(jamie)\nWishful(jamie)\nCauseway(jamie, myrlene)\nCauseway(jamie, yancey)\nnot Causeway(jamie, corly)\nforall x (Causeway(x, myrlene) -> Causeway(myrlene, corly))\nforall x (Lacking(x) -> Worthful(x))\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> not Alfresco(x))\n\nNeeds(myrlene, myrlene)\n\nNeeds(myrlene, myrlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The glennie is manageable. The teresina is executable. The teresina is not manageable. The teresina is semihard. The mirabelle is manageable. The mirabelle demist the teresina. The mirabelle room the teresina. The kristyn is turkic. The kristyn is manageable. The kristyn room the glennie. The kristyn room the teresina. The kristyn does not visit the mirabelle. If someone room the glennie then the glennie room the mirabelle. Big people are apodous. Round people are not semihard. The kristyn does not need the teresina.", "logic": "\nManageable(glennie)\nExecutable(teresina)\nnot Manageable(teresina)\nSemihard(teresina)\nManageable(mirabelle)\nDemist(mirabelle, teresina)\nRoom(mirabelle, teresina)\nTurkic(kristyn)\nManageable(kristyn)\nRoom(kristyn, glennie)\nRoom(kristyn, teresina)\nnot Room(kristyn, mirabelle)\nforall x (Room(x, glennie) -> Room(glennie, mirabelle))\nforall x (Turkic(x) -> Apodous(x))\nforall x (Apodous(x) -> not Semihard(x))\n\nnot Needs(kristyn, teresina)\n\nnot Needs(kristyn, teresina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The gregor is uneager. The sioux is chlamydial. The sioux is not uneager. The sioux is toilsome. The birgitta is uneager. The birgitta realise the sioux. The birgitta repair the sioux. The suzan is thudding. The suzan is uneager. The suzan repair the gregor. The suzan repair the sioux. The suzan does not visit the birgitta. If someone repair the gregor then the gregor repair the birgitta. Big people are brotherly. Round people are not toilsome. The birgitta needs the gregor.", "logic": "\nUneager(gregor)\nChlamydial(sioux)\nnot Uneager(sioux)\nToilsome(sioux)\nUneager(birgitta)\nRealise(birgitta, sioux)\nRepair(birgitta, sioux)\nThudding(suzan)\nUneager(suzan)\nRepair(suzan, gregor)\nRepair(suzan, sioux)\nnot Repair(suzan, birgitta)\nforall x (Repair(x, gregor) -> Repair(gregor, birgitta))\nforall x (Thudding(x) -> Brotherly(x))\nforall x (Brotherly(x) -> not Toilsome(x))\n\nNeeds(birgitta, gregor)\n\nNeeds(birgitta, gregor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2117"} {"premises": "The chev does not chase the dougie. The chev soundproof the dougie. The chev is leading. The chev is granular. The troy is adient. The troy is worsening. The dougie is xlii. If someone is leading then they chase the troy. If the troy soundproof the chev then the chev soundproof the troy. If someone bung the troy then they are not adient. The troy is worsening.", "logic": "\nnot Bung(chev, dougie)\nSoundproof(chev, dougie)\nLeading(chev)\nGranular(chev)\nAdient(troy)\nWorsening(troy)\nXlii(dougie)\nforall x (Leading(x) -> Bung(x, troy))\nSoundproof(troy, chev) -> Soundproof(chev, troy)\nforall x (Bung(x, troy) -> not Adient(x))\n\nWorsening(troy)\n\ntherefore Worsening(troy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The zed does not chase the cary. The zed neutralize the cary. The zed is nurturant. The zed is adsorbate. The munroe is posh. The munroe is forfeited. The cary is capsulate. If someone is nurturant then they chase the munroe. If the munroe neutralize the zed then the zed neutralize the munroe. If someone huff the munroe then they are not posh. The zed huff the cary.", "logic": "\nnot Huff(zed, cary)\nNeutralize(zed, cary)\nNurturant(zed)\nAdsorbate(zed)\nPosh(munroe)\nForfeited(munroe)\nCapsulate(cary)\nforall x (Nurturant(x) -> Huff(x, munroe))\nNeutralize(munroe, zed) -> Neutralize(zed, munroe)\nforall x (Huff(x, munroe) -> not Posh(x))\n\nHuff(zed, cary)\n\ntherefore not Huff(zed, cary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The norri does not chase the ismail. The norri ramble the ismail. The norri is smoggy. The norri is ringlike. The pandora is unfueled. The pandora is epicyclic. The ismail is freeborn. If someone is smoggy then they chase the pandora. If the pandora ramble the norri then the norri ramble the pandora. If someone front the pandora then they are not unfueled. The norri front the pandora.", "logic": "\nnot Front(norri, ismail)\nRamble(norri, ismail)\nSmoggy(norri)\nRinglike(norri)\nUnfueled(pandora)\nEpicyclic(pandora)\nFreeborn(ismail)\nforall x (Smoggy(x) -> Front(x, pandora))\nRamble(pandora, norri) -> Ramble(norri, pandora)\nforall x (Front(x, pandora) -> not Unfueled(x))\n\nFront(norri, pandora)\n\nSmoggy(norri) and forall x (Smoggy(x) -> Front(x, pandora)) -> therefore Front(norri, pandora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The ernesto does not chase the taryn. The ernesto becalm the taryn. The ernesto is corpulent. The ernesto is lactic. The wynn is uruguayan. The wynn is phrenic. The taryn is columnar. If someone is corpulent then they chase the wynn. If the wynn becalm the ernesto then the ernesto becalm the wynn. If someone revolt the wynn then they are not uruguayan. The ernesto does not chase the wynn.", "logic": "\nnot Revolt(ernesto, taryn)\nBecalm(ernesto, taryn)\nCorpulent(ernesto)\nLactic(ernesto)\nUruguayan(wynn)\nPhrenic(wynn)\nColumnar(taryn)\nforall x (Corpulent(x) -> Revolt(x, wynn))\nBecalm(wynn, ernesto) -> Becalm(ernesto, wynn)\nforall x (Revolt(x, wynn) -> not Uruguayan(x))\n\nnot Revolt(ernesto, wynn)\n\nCorpulent(ernesto) and forall x (Corpulent(x) -> Revolt(x, wynn)) -> therefore Revolt(ernesto, wynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The yaakov does not chase the lennie. The yaakov plat the lennie. The yaakov is ranked. The yaakov is unrifled. The michale is maintained. The michale is ataraxic. The lennie is autosomal. If someone is ranked then they chase the michale. If the michale plat the yaakov then the yaakov plat the michale. If someone vitalise the michale then they are not maintained. The yaakov is not maintained.", "logic": "\nnot Vitalise(yaakov, lennie)\nPlat(yaakov, lennie)\nRanked(yaakov)\nUnrifled(yaakov)\nMaintained(michale)\nAtaraxic(michale)\nAutosomal(lennie)\nforall x (Ranked(x) -> Vitalise(x, michale))\nPlat(michale, yaakov) -> Plat(yaakov, michale)\nforall x (Vitalise(x, michale) -> not Maintained(x))\n\nnot Maintained(yaakov)\n\nRanked(yaakov) and forall x (Ranked(x) -> Vitalise(x, michale)) -> therefore Vitalise(yaakov, michale) Vitalise(yaakov, michale) and forall x (Vitalise(x, michale) -> not Maintained(x)) -> therefore not Maintained(yaakov)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The grethel does not chase the lenee. The grethel subluxate the lenee. The grethel is prominent. The grethel is squamulose. The charline is hematal. The charline is darwinian. The lenee is twofold. If someone is prominent then they chase the charline. If the charline subluxate the grethel then the grethel subluxate the charline. If someone shimmer the charline then they are not hematal. The grethel is hematal.", "logic": "\nnot Shimmer(grethel, lenee)\nSubluxate(grethel, lenee)\nProminent(grethel)\nSquamulose(grethel)\nHematal(charline)\nDarwinian(charline)\nTwofold(lenee)\nforall x (Prominent(x) -> Shimmer(x, charline))\nSubluxate(charline, grethel) -> Subluxate(grethel, charline)\nforall x (Shimmer(x, charline) -> not Hematal(x))\n\nHematal(grethel)\n\nProminent(grethel) and forall x (Prominent(x) -> Shimmer(x, charline)) -> therefore Shimmer(grethel, charline) Shimmer(grethel, charline) and forall x (Shimmer(x, charline) -> not Hematal(x)) -> therefore not Hematal(grethel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The batsheva does not chase the cybill. The batsheva disdain the cybill. The batsheva is unsinkable. The batsheva is unsloped. The heywood is severe. The heywood is fragmented. The cybill is toxic. If someone is unsinkable then they chase the heywood. If the heywood disdain the batsheva then the batsheva disdain the heywood. If someone barbecue the heywood then they are not severe. The heywood does not chase the heywood.", "logic": "\nnot Barbecue(batsheva, cybill)\nDisdain(batsheva, cybill)\nUnsinkable(batsheva)\nUnsloped(batsheva)\nSevere(heywood)\nFragmented(heywood)\nToxic(cybill)\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Barbecue(x, heywood))\nDisdain(heywood, batsheva) -> Disdain(batsheva, heywood)\nforall x (Barbecue(x, heywood) -> not Severe(x))\n\nnot Barbecue(heywood, heywood)\n\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Barbecue(x, heywood)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The edgardo does not chase the ethelred. The edgardo redo the ethelred. The edgardo is grazed. The edgardo is polydactyl. The darth is avertible. The darth is liberian. The ethelred is reefy. If someone is grazed then they chase the darth. If the darth redo the edgardo then the edgardo redo the darth. If someone mulch the darth then they are not avertible. The edgardo redo the darth.", "logic": "\nnot Mulch(edgardo, ethelred)\nRedo(edgardo, ethelred)\nGrazed(edgardo)\nPolydactyl(edgardo)\nAvertible(darth)\nLiberian(darth)\nReefy(ethelred)\nforall x (Grazed(x) -> Mulch(x, darth))\nRedo(darth, edgardo) -> Redo(edgardo, darth)\nforall x (Mulch(x, darth) -> not Avertible(x))\n\nRedo(edgardo, darth)\n\nRedo(darth, edgardo) -> Redo(edgardo, darth) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The matilde does not chase the ronna. The matilde disfavor the ronna. The matilde is wailing. The matilde is amorous. The berget is activating. The berget is loveless. The ronna is carpal. If someone is wailing then they chase the berget. If the berget disfavor the matilde then the matilde disfavor the berget. If someone criminate the berget then they are not activating. The ronna does not chase the berget.", "logic": "\nnot Criminate(matilde, ronna)\nDisfavor(matilde, ronna)\nWailing(matilde)\nAmorous(matilde)\nActivating(berget)\nLoveless(berget)\nCarpal(ronna)\nforall x (Wailing(x) -> Criminate(x, berget))\nDisfavor(berget, matilde) -> Disfavor(matilde, berget)\nforall x (Criminate(x, berget) -> not Activating(x))\n\nnot Criminate(ronna, berget)\n\nforall x (Wailing(x) -> Criminate(x, berget)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The lorrin does not chase the ethelda. The lorrin masquerade the ethelda. The lorrin is guided. The lorrin is uncool. The sallyann is inquiring. The sallyann is snowy. The ethelda is weedy. If someone is guided then they chase the sallyann. If the sallyann masquerade the lorrin then the lorrin masquerade the sallyann. If someone supersede the sallyann then they are not inquiring. The lorrin sees the ethelda.", "logic": "\nnot Supersede(lorrin, ethelda)\nMasquerade(lorrin, ethelda)\nGuided(lorrin)\nUncool(lorrin)\nInquiring(sallyann)\nSnowy(sallyann)\nWeedy(ethelda)\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Supersede(x, sallyann))\nMasquerade(sallyann, lorrin) -> Masquerade(lorrin, sallyann)\nforall x (Supersede(x, sallyann) -> not Inquiring(x))\n\nSees(lorrin, ethelda)\n\nSees(lorrin, ethelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The cristine does not chase the robbert. The cristine defrost the robbert. The cristine is unconfined. The cristine is aroid. The minta is sedate. The minta is continent. The robbert is waggish. If someone is unconfined then they chase the minta. If the minta defrost the cristine then the cristine defrost the minta. If someone unzip the minta then they are not sedate. The minta does not see the cristine.", "logic": "\nnot Unzip(cristine, robbert)\nDefrost(cristine, robbert)\nUnconfined(cristine)\nAroid(cristine)\nSedate(minta)\nContinent(minta)\nWaggish(robbert)\nforall x (Unconfined(x) -> Unzip(x, minta))\nDefrost(minta, cristine) -> Defrost(cristine, minta)\nforall x (Unzip(x, minta) -> not Sedate(x))\n\nnot Sees(minta, cristine)\n\nnot Sees(minta, cristine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The agnola does not chase the marcel. The agnola beguile the marcel. The agnola is nilotic. The agnola is unpleasant. The matelda is unitary. The matelda is lively. The marcel is midland. If someone is nilotic then they chase the matelda. If the matelda beguile the agnola then the agnola beguile the matelda. If someone escallop the matelda then they are not unitary. The marcel sees the matelda.", "logic": "\nnot Escallop(agnola, marcel)\nBeguile(agnola, marcel)\nNilotic(agnola)\nUnpleasant(agnola)\nUnitary(matelda)\nLively(matelda)\nMidland(marcel)\nforall x (Nilotic(x) -> Escallop(x, matelda))\nBeguile(matelda, agnola) -> Beguile(agnola, matelda)\nforall x (Escallop(x, matelda) -> not Unitary(x))\n\nSees(marcel, matelda)\n\nSees(marcel, matelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1823"} {"premises": "The joby is verminous. The joby trowel the jane. The joby trowel the carlynne. The joby mongrelize the jane. The jane enrage the carlynne. The jane mongrelize the carlynne. The carlynne enrage the joby. The carlynne enrage the jane. The carlynne trowel the jane. The carlynne mongrelize the jane. If the joby is getable and the joby mongrelize the jane then the joby trowel the carlynne. If someone is subaquatic then they visit the carlynne. If the jane is bilobate and the jane is wimpy then the jane trowel the joby. If someone enrage the carlynne then the carlynne mongrelize the joby. If the joby enrage the carlynne then the carlynne is getable. If the jane is verminous then the jane mongrelize the carlynne. If the joby enrage the jane then the jane mongrelize the carlynne. If someone is verminous then they are subaquatic. The jane enrage the carlynne.", "logic": "\nVerminous(joby)\nTrowel(joby, jane)\nTrowel(joby, carlynne)\nMongrelize(joby, jane)\nEnrage(jane, carlynne)\nMongrelize(jane, carlynne)\nEnrage(carlynne, joby)\nEnrage(carlynne, jane)\nTrowel(carlynne, jane)\nMongrelize(carlynne, jane)\nGetable(joby) and Mongrelize(joby, jane) -> Trowel(joby, carlynne)\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Mongrelize(x, carlynne))\nBilobate(jane) and Wimpy(jane) -> Trowel(jane, joby)\nforall x (Enrage(x, carlynne) -> Mongrelize(carlynne, joby))\nEnrage(joby, carlynne) -> Getable(carlynne)\nVerminous(jane) -> Mongrelize(jane, carlynne)\nEnrage(joby, jane) -> Mongrelize(jane, carlynne)\nforall x (Verminous(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\n\nEnrage(jane, carlynne)\n\ntherefore Enrage(jane, carlynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The margot is peccant. The margot inlay the herrmann. The margot inlay the henrieta. The margot barricade the herrmann. The herrmann accentuate the henrieta. The herrmann barricade the henrieta. The henrieta accentuate the margot. The henrieta accentuate the herrmann. The henrieta inlay the herrmann. The henrieta barricade the herrmann. If the margot is autolytic and the margot barricade the herrmann then the margot inlay the henrieta. If someone is torn then they visit the henrieta. If the herrmann is unitarian and the herrmann is junoesque then the herrmann inlay the margot. If someone accentuate the henrieta then the henrieta barricade the margot. If the margot accentuate the henrieta then the henrieta is autolytic. If the herrmann is peccant then the herrmann barricade the henrieta. If the margot accentuate the herrmann then the herrmann barricade the henrieta. If someone is peccant then they are torn. The margot does not like the henrieta.", "logic": "\nPeccant(margot)\nInlay(margot, herrmann)\nInlay(margot, henrieta)\nBarricade(margot, herrmann)\nAccentuate(herrmann, henrieta)\nBarricade(herrmann, henrieta)\nAccentuate(henrieta, margot)\nAccentuate(henrieta, herrmann)\nInlay(henrieta, herrmann)\nBarricade(henrieta, herrmann)\nAutolytic(margot) and Barricade(margot, herrmann) -> Inlay(margot, henrieta)\nforall x (Torn(x) -> Barricade(x, henrieta))\nUnitarian(herrmann) and Junoesque(herrmann) -> Inlay(herrmann, margot)\nforall x (Accentuate(x, henrieta) -> Barricade(henrieta, margot))\nAccentuate(margot, henrieta) -> Autolytic(henrieta)\nPeccant(herrmann) -> Barricade(herrmann, henrieta)\nAccentuate(margot, herrmann) -> Barricade(herrmann, henrieta)\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Torn(x))\n\nnot Inlay(margot, henrieta)\n\ntherefore Inlay(margot, henrieta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The hamlet is rich. The hamlet mythicise the heda. The hamlet mythicise the keith. The hamlet crystalise the heda. The heda chasse the keith. The heda crystalise the keith. The keith chasse the hamlet. The keith chasse the heda. The keith mythicise the heda. The keith crystalise the heda. If the hamlet is thrilling and the hamlet crystalise the heda then the hamlet mythicise the keith. If someone is outspread then they visit the keith. If the heda is unmingled and the heda is ringed then the heda mythicise the hamlet. If someone chasse the keith then the keith crystalise the hamlet. If the hamlet chasse the keith then the keith is thrilling. If the heda is rich then the heda crystalise the keith. If the hamlet chasse the heda then the heda crystalise the keith. If someone is rich then they are outspread. The hamlet is outspread.", "logic": "\nRich(hamlet)\nMythicise(hamlet, heda)\nMythicise(hamlet, keith)\nCrystalise(hamlet, heda)\nChasse(heda, keith)\nCrystalise(heda, keith)\nChasse(keith, hamlet)\nChasse(keith, heda)\nMythicise(keith, heda)\nCrystalise(keith, heda)\nThrilling(hamlet) and Crystalise(hamlet, heda) -> Mythicise(hamlet, keith)\nforall x (Outspread(x) -> Crystalise(x, keith))\nUnmingled(heda) and Ringed(heda) -> Mythicise(heda, hamlet)\nforall x (Chasse(x, keith) -> Crystalise(keith, hamlet))\nChasse(hamlet, keith) -> Thrilling(keith)\nRich(heda) -> Crystalise(heda, keith)\nChasse(hamlet, heda) -> Crystalise(heda, keith)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Outspread(x))\n\nOutspread(hamlet)\n\nRich(hamlet) and forall x (Rich(x) -> Outspread(x)) -> therefore Outspread(hamlet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The marlin is infected. The marlin nonplus the skyler. The marlin nonplus the jennette. The marlin reawaken the skyler. The skyler fleer the jennette. The skyler reawaken the jennette. The jennette fleer the marlin. The jennette fleer the skyler. The jennette nonplus the skyler. The jennette reawaken the skyler. If the marlin is epileptic and the marlin reawaken the skyler then the marlin nonplus the jennette. If someone is ameboid then they visit the jennette. If the skyler is thrown and the skyler is biaxial then the skyler nonplus the marlin. If someone fleer the jennette then the jennette reawaken the marlin. If the marlin fleer the jennette then the jennette is epileptic. If the skyler is infected then the skyler reawaken the jennette. If the marlin fleer the skyler then the skyler reawaken the jennette. If someone is infected then they are ameboid. The marlin is not ameboid.", "logic": "\nInfected(marlin)\nNonplus(marlin, skyler)\nNonplus(marlin, jennette)\nReawaken(marlin, skyler)\nFleer(skyler, jennette)\nReawaken(skyler, jennette)\nFleer(jennette, marlin)\nFleer(jennette, skyler)\nNonplus(jennette, skyler)\nReawaken(jennette, skyler)\nEpileptic(marlin) and Reawaken(marlin, skyler) -> Nonplus(marlin, jennette)\nforall x (Ameboid(x) -> Reawaken(x, jennette))\nThrown(skyler) and Biaxial(skyler) -> Nonplus(skyler, marlin)\nforall x (Fleer(x, jennette) -> Reawaken(jennette, marlin))\nFleer(marlin, jennette) -> Epileptic(jennette)\nInfected(skyler) -> Reawaken(skyler, jennette)\nFleer(marlin, skyler) -> Reawaken(skyler, jennette)\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Ameboid(x))\n\nnot Ameboid(marlin)\n\nInfected(marlin) and forall x (Infected(x) -> Ameboid(x)) -> therefore Ameboid(marlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The wally is polemical. The wally accredit the ignacio. The wally accredit the mei. The wally trickle the ignacio. The ignacio raft the mei. The ignacio trickle the mei. The mei raft the wally. The mei raft the ignacio. The mei accredit the ignacio. The mei trickle the ignacio. If the wally is mesmerized and the wally trickle the ignacio then the wally accredit the mei. If someone is edentate then they visit the mei. If the ignacio is apomictic and the ignacio is sordid then the ignacio accredit the wally. If someone raft the mei then the mei trickle the wally. If the wally raft the mei then the mei is mesmerized. If the ignacio is polemical then the ignacio trickle the mei. If the wally raft the ignacio then the ignacio trickle the mei. If someone is polemical then they are edentate. The wally trickle the mei.", "logic": "\nPolemical(wally)\nAccredit(wally, ignacio)\nAccredit(wally, mei)\nTrickle(wally, ignacio)\nRaft(ignacio, mei)\nTrickle(ignacio, mei)\nRaft(mei, wally)\nRaft(mei, ignacio)\nAccredit(mei, ignacio)\nTrickle(mei, ignacio)\nMesmerized(wally) and Trickle(wally, ignacio) -> Accredit(wally, mei)\nforall x (Edentate(x) -> Trickle(x, mei))\nApomictic(ignacio) and Sordid(ignacio) -> Accredit(ignacio, wally)\nforall x (Raft(x, mei) -> Trickle(mei, wally))\nRaft(wally, mei) -> Mesmerized(mei)\nPolemical(ignacio) -> Trickle(ignacio, mei)\nRaft(wally, ignacio) -> Trickle(ignacio, mei)\nforall x (Polemical(x) -> Edentate(x))\n\nTrickle(wally, mei)\n\nPolemical(wally) and forall x (Polemical(x) -> Edentate(x)) -> therefore Edentate(wally) Edentate(wally) and forall x (Edentate(x) -> Trickle(x, mei)) -> therefore Trickle(wally, mei)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The micah is tidal. The micah premiss the morissa. The micah premiss the concordia. The micah refocus the morissa. The morissa relate the concordia. The morissa refocus the concordia. The concordia relate the micah. The concordia relate the morissa. The concordia premiss the morissa. The concordia refocus the morissa. If the micah is cxxx and the micah refocus the morissa then the micah premiss the concordia. If someone is lifted then they visit the concordia. If the morissa is dormant and the morissa is undiluted then the morissa premiss the micah. If someone relate the concordia then the concordia refocus the micah. If the micah relate the concordia then the concordia is cxxx. If the morissa is tidal then the morissa refocus the concordia. If the micah relate the morissa then the morissa refocus the concordia. If someone is tidal then they are lifted. The micah does not visit the concordia.", "logic": "\nTidal(micah)\nPremiss(micah, morissa)\nPremiss(micah, concordia)\nRefocus(micah, morissa)\nRelate(morissa, concordia)\nRefocus(morissa, concordia)\nRelate(concordia, micah)\nRelate(concordia, morissa)\nPremiss(concordia, morissa)\nRefocus(concordia, morissa)\nCxxx(micah) and Refocus(micah, morissa) -> Premiss(micah, concordia)\nforall x (Lifted(x) -> Refocus(x, concordia))\nDormant(morissa) and Undiluted(morissa) -> Premiss(morissa, micah)\nforall x (Relate(x, concordia) -> Refocus(concordia, micah))\nRelate(micah, concordia) -> Cxxx(concordia)\nTidal(morissa) -> Refocus(morissa, concordia)\nRelate(micah, morissa) -> Refocus(morissa, concordia)\nforall x (Tidal(x) -> Lifted(x))\n\nnot Refocus(micah, concordia)\n\nTidal(micah) and forall x (Tidal(x) -> Lifted(x)) -> therefore Lifted(micah) Lifted(micah) and forall x (Lifted(x) -> Refocus(x, concordia)) -> therefore Refocus(micah, concordia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The sherlock is viceregal. The sherlock horse the delores. The sherlock horse the ignatius. The sherlock disappear the delores. The delores outspan the ignatius. The delores disappear the ignatius. The ignatius outspan the sherlock. The ignatius outspan the delores. The ignatius horse the delores. The ignatius disappear the delores. If the sherlock is humoral and the sherlock disappear the delores then the sherlock horse the ignatius. If someone is lymphatic then they visit the ignatius. If the delores is unobvious and the delores is slithery then the delores horse the sherlock. If someone outspan the ignatius then the ignatius disappear the sherlock. If the sherlock outspan the ignatius then the ignatius is humoral. If the delores is viceregal then the delores disappear the ignatius. If the sherlock outspan the delores then the delores disappear the ignatius. If someone is viceregal then they are lymphatic. The ignatius does not visit the ignatius.", "logic": "\nViceregal(sherlock)\nHorse(sherlock, delores)\nHorse(sherlock, ignatius)\nDisappear(sherlock, delores)\nOutspan(delores, ignatius)\nDisappear(delores, ignatius)\nOutspan(ignatius, sherlock)\nOutspan(ignatius, delores)\nHorse(ignatius, delores)\nDisappear(ignatius, delores)\nHumoral(sherlock) and Disappear(sherlock, delores) -> Horse(sherlock, ignatius)\nforall x (Lymphatic(x) -> Disappear(x, ignatius))\nUnobvious(delores) and Slithery(delores) -> Horse(delores, sherlock)\nforall x (Outspan(x, ignatius) -> Disappear(ignatius, sherlock))\nOutspan(sherlock, ignatius) -> Humoral(ignatius)\nViceregal(delores) -> Disappear(delores, ignatius)\nOutspan(sherlock, delores) -> Disappear(delores, ignatius)\nforall x (Viceregal(x) -> Lymphatic(x))\n\nnot Disappear(ignatius, ignatius)\n\nforall x (Lymphatic(x) -> Disappear(x, ignatius)) <- forall x (Viceregal(x) -> Lymphatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The lazare is gamey. The lazare scatter the mic. The lazare scatter the codi. The lazare startle the mic. The mic sibilate the codi. The mic startle the codi. The codi sibilate the lazare. The codi sibilate the mic. The codi scatter the mic. The codi startle the mic. If the lazare is pacifistic and the lazare startle the mic then the lazare scatter the codi. If someone is posh then they visit the codi. If the mic is astomatous and the mic is meltable then the mic scatter the lazare. If someone sibilate the codi then the codi startle the lazare. If the lazare sibilate the codi then the codi is pacifistic. If the mic is gamey then the mic startle the codi. If the lazare sibilate the mic then the mic startle the codi. If someone is gamey then they are posh. The mic is posh.", "logic": "\nGamey(lazare)\nScatter(lazare, mic)\nScatter(lazare, codi)\nStartle(lazare, mic)\nSibilate(mic, codi)\nStartle(mic, codi)\nSibilate(codi, lazare)\nSibilate(codi, mic)\nScatter(codi, mic)\nStartle(codi, mic)\nPacifistic(lazare) and Startle(lazare, mic) -> Scatter(lazare, codi)\nforall x (Posh(x) -> Startle(x, codi))\nAstomatous(mic) and Meltable(mic) -> Scatter(mic, lazare)\nforall x (Sibilate(x, codi) -> Startle(codi, lazare))\nSibilate(lazare, codi) -> Pacifistic(codi)\nGamey(mic) -> Startle(mic, codi)\nSibilate(lazare, mic) -> Startle(mic, codi)\nforall x (Gamey(x) -> Posh(x))\n\nPosh(mic)\n\nforall x (Gamey(x) -> Posh(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The vladimir is gigantic. The vladimir backslap the tobi. The vladimir backslap the colene. The vladimir heal the tobi. The tobi stump the colene. The tobi heal the colene. The colene stump the vladimir. The colene stump the tobi. The colene backslap the tobi. The colene heal the tobi. If the vladimir is roumanian and the vladimir heal the tobi then the vladimir backslap the colene. If someone is fallow then they visit the colene. If the tobi is saute and the tobi is blusterous then the tobi backslap the vladimir. If someone stump the colene then the colene heal the vladimir. If the vladimir stump the colene then the colene is roumanian. If the tobi is gigantic then the tobi heal the colene. If the vladimir stump the tobi then the tobi heal the colene. If someone is gigantic then they are fallow. The tobi does not like the vladimir.", "logic": "\nGigantic(vladimir)\nBackslap(vladimir, tobi)\nBackslap(vladimir, colene)\nHeal(vladimir, tobi)\nStump(tobi, colene)\nHeal(tobi, colene)\nStump(colene, vladimir)\nStump(colene, tobi)\nBackslap(colene, tobi)\nHeal(colene, tobi)\nRoumanian(vladimir) and Heal(vladimir, tobi) -> Backslap(vladimir, colene)\nforall x (Fallow(x) -> Heal(x, colene))\nSaute(tobi) and Blusterous(tobi) -> Backslap(tobi, vladimir)\nforall x (Stump(x, colene) -> Heal(colene, vladimir))\nStump(vladimir, colene) -> Roumanian(colene)\nGigantic(tobi) -> Heal(tobi, colene)\nStump(vladimir, tobi) -> Heal(tobi, colene)\nforall x (Gigantic(x) -> Fallow(x))\n\nnot Backslap(tobi, vladimir)\n\nSaute(tobi) and Blusterous(tobi) -> Backslap(tobi, vladimir) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The becka is frigid. The becka single the cordie. The becka single the zsazsa. The becka excrete the cordie. The cordie incrust the zsazsa. The cordie excrete the zsazsa. The zsazsa incrust the becka. The zsazsa incrust the cordie. The zsazsa single the cordie. The zsazsa excrete the cordie. If the becka is mucoidal and the becka excrete the cordie then the becka single the zsazsa. If someone is emollient then they visit the zsazsa. If the cordie is silvery and the cordie is torulose then the cordie single the becka. If someone incrust the zsazsa then the zsazsa excrete the becka. If the becka incrust the zsazsa then the zsazsa is mucoidal. If the cordie is frigid then the cordie excrete the zsazsa. If the becka incrust the cordie then the cordie excrete the zsazsa. If someone is frigid then they are emollient. The cordie excrete the cordie.", "logic": "\nFrigid(becka)\nSingle(becka, cordie)\nSingle(becka, zsazsa)\nExcrete(becka, cordie)\nIncrust(cordie, zsazsa)\nExcrete(cordie, zsazsa)\nIncrust(zsazsa, becka)\nIncrust(zsazsa, cordie)\nSingle(zsazsa, cordie)\nExcrete(zsazsa, cordie)\nMucoidal(becka) and Excrete(becka, cordie) -> Single(becka, zsazsa)\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> Excrete(x, zsazsa))\nSilvery(cordie) and Torulose(cordie) -> Single(cordie, becka)\nforall x (Incrust(x, zsazsa) -> Excrete(zsazsa, becka))\nIncrust(becka, zsazsa) -> Mucoidal(zsazsa)\nFrigid(cordie) -> Excrete(cordie, zsazsa)\nIncrust(becka, cordie) -> Excrete(cordie, zsazsa)\nforall x (Frigid(x) -> Emollient(x))\n\nExcrete(cordie, cordie)\n\nExcrete(cordie, cordie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The koralle is forgiving. The koralle snooze the jojo. The koralle snooze the dione. The koralle function the jojo. The jojo conga the dione. The jojo function the dione. The dione conga the koralle. The dione conga the jojo. The dione snooze the jojo. The dione function the jojo. If the koralle is nubbly and the koralle function the jojo then the koralle snooze the dione. If someone is avuncular then they visit the dione. If the jojo is sinkable and the jojo is netted then the jojo snooze the koralle. If someone conga the dione then the dione function the koralle. If the koralle conga the dione then the dione is nubbly. If the jojo is forgiving then the jojo function the dione. If the koralle conga the jojo then the jojo function the dione. If someone is forgiving then they are avuncular. The dione does not eat the dione.", "logic": "\nForgiving(koralle)\nSnooze(koralle, jojo)\nSnooze(koralle, dione)\nFunction(koralle, jojo)\nConga(jojo, dione)\nFunction(jojo, dione)\nConga(dione, koralle)\nConga(dione, jojo)\nSnooze(dione, jojo)\nFunction(dione, jojo)\nNubbly(koralle) and Function(koralle, jojo) -> Snooze(koralle, dione)\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Function(x, dione))\nSinkable(jojo) and Netted(jojo) -> Snooze(jojo, koralle)\nforall x (Conga(x, dione) -> Function(dione, koralle))\nConga(koralle, dione) -> Nubbly(dione)\nForgiving(jojo) -> Function(jojo, dione)\nConga(koralle, jojo) -> Function(jojo, dione)\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> Avuncular(x))\n\nnot Conga(dione, dione)\n\nnot Conga(dione, dione) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The clay is tapering. The clay plonk the frieda. The clay plonk the sharie. The clay upload the frieda. The frieda hibachi the sharie. The frieda upload the sharie. The sharie hibachi the clay. The sharie hibachi the frieda. The sharie plonk the frieda. The sharie upload the frieda. If the clay is epizoic and the clay upload the frieda then the clay plonk the sharie. If someone is florentine then they visit the sharie. If the frieda is consummate and the frieda is slubbed then the frieda plonk the clay. If someone hibachi the sharie then the sharie upload the clay. If the clay hibachi the sharie then the sharie is epizoic. If the frieda is tapering then the frieda upload the sharie. If the clay hibachi the frieda then the frieda upload the sharie. If someone is tapering then they are florentine. The sharie is consummate.", "logic": "\nTapering(clay)\nPlonk(clay, frieda)\nPlonk(clay, sharie)\nUpload(clay, frieda)\nHibachi(frieda, sharie)\nUpload(frieda, sharie)\nHibachi(sharie, clay)\nHibachi(sharie, frieda)\nPlonk(sharie, frieda)\nUpload(sharie, frieda)\nEpizoic(clay) and Upload(clay, frieda) -> Plonk(clay, sharie)\nforall x (Florentine(x) -> Upload(x, sharie))\nConsummate(frieda) and Slubbed(frieda) -> Plonk(frieda, clay)\nforall x (Hibachi(x, sharie) -> Upload(sharie, clay))\nHibachi(clay, sharie) -> Epizoic(sharie)\nTapering(frieda) -> Upload(frieda, sharie)\nHibachi(clay, frieda) -> Upload(frieda, sharie)\nforall x (Tapering(x) -> Florentine(x))\n\nConsummate(sharie)\n\nConsummate(sharie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1601"} {"premises": "The tiena does not chase the odessa. The tiena is untipped. The tiena is inferior. The tiena is uncut. The tiena is cursory. The tiena is not travelable. The tiena alarm the odessa. The tiena colorcast the odessa. The odessa squelch the tiena. The odessa is untipped. The odessa is inferior. The odessa is cursory. The odessa is travelable. The odessa alarm the tiena. The odessa colorcast the tiena. If something colorcast the odessa then the odessa squelch the tiena. If something colorcast the odessa and it is not travelable then the odessa squelch the tiena. If something is cursory and untipped then it colorcast the odessa. If something colorcast the odessa then it alarm the odessa. If something alarm the tiena then it is inferior. If something colorcast the tiena then the tiena is inferior. The odessa is travelable.", "logic": "\nnot Squelch(tiena, odessa)\nUntipped(tiena)\nInferior(tiena)\nUncut(tiena)\nCursory(tiena)\nnot Travelable(tiena)\nAlarm(tiena, odessa)\nColorcast(tiena, odessa)\nSquelch(odessa, tiena)\nUntipped(odessa)\nInferior(odessa)\nCursory(odessa)\nTravelable(odessa)\nAlarm(odessa, tiena)\nColorcast(odessa, tiena)\nforall x (Colorcast(x, odessa) -> Squelch(odessa, tiena))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, odessa) and not Travelable(x) -> Squelch(odessa, tiena))\nforall x (Cursory(x) and Untipped(x) -> Colorcast(x, odessa))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, odessa) -> Alarm(x, odessa))\nforall x (Alarm(x, tiena) -> Inferior(x))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, tiena) -> Inferior(tiena))\n\nTravelable(odessa)\n\ntherefore Travelable(odessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The rachel does not chase the phillip. The rachel is allergenic. The rachel is hokey. The rachel is unportable. The rachel is unreleased. The rachel is not brute. The rachel stall the phillip. The rachel sightread the phillip. The phillip solace the rachel. The phillip is allergenic. The phillip is hokey. The phillip is unreleased. The phillip is brute. The phillip stall the rachel. The phillip sightread the rachel. If something sightread the phillip then the phillip solace the rachel. If something sightread the phillip and it is not brute then the phillip solace the rachel. If something is unreleased and allergenic then it sightread the phillip. If something sightread the phillip then it stall the phillip. If something stall the rachel then it is hokey. If something sightread the rachel then the rachel is hokey. The rachel solace the phillip.", "logic": "\nnot Solace(rachel, phillip)\nAllergenic(rachel)\nHokey(rachel)\nUnportable(rachel)\nUnreleased(rachel)\nnot Brute(rachel)\nStall(rachel, phillip)\nSightread(rachel, phillip)\nSolace(phillip, rachel)\nAllergenic(phillip)\nHokey(phillip)\nUnreleased(phillip)\nBrute(phillip)\nStall(phillip, rachel)\nSightread(phillip, rachel)\nforall x (Sightread(x, phillip) -> Solace(phillip, rachel))\nforall x (Sightread(x, phillip) and not Brute(x) -> Solace(phillip, rachel))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) and Allergenic(x) -> Sightread(x, phillip))\nforall x (Sightread(x, phillip) -> Stall(x, phillip))\nforall x (Stall(x, rachel) -> Hokey(x))\nforall x (Sightread(x, rachel) -> Hokey(rachel))\n\nSolace(rachel, phillip)\n\ntherefore not Solace(rachel, phillip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The andria does not chase the vicky. The andria is emaciated. The andria is habitable. The andria is pancreatic. The andria is uncolumned. The andria is not wieldy. The andria knife the vicky. The andria bifurcate the vicky. The vicky lave the andria. The vicky is emaciated. The vicky is habitable. The vicky is uncolumned. The vicky is wieldy. The vicky knife the andria. The vicky bifurcate the andria. If something bifurcate the vicky then the vicky lave the andria. If something bifurcate the vicky and it is not wieldy then the vicky lave the andria. If something is uncolumned and emaciated then it bifurcate the vicky. If something bifurcate the vicky then it knife the vicky. If something knife the andria then it is habitable. If something bifurcate the andria then the andria is habitable. The vicky bifurcate the vicky.", "logic": "\nnot Lave(andria, vicky)\nEmaciated(andria)\nHabitable(andria)\nPancreatic(andria)\nUncolumned(andria)\nnot Wieldy(andria)\nKnife(andria, vicky)\nBifurcate(andria, vicky)\nLave(vicky, andria)\nEmaciated(vicky)\nHabitable(vicky)\nUncolumned(vicky)\nWieldy(vicky)\nKnife(vicky, andria)\nBifurcate(vicky, andria)\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, vicky) -> Lave(vicky, andria))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, vicky) and not Wieldy(x) -> Lave(vicky, andria))\nforall x (Uncolumned(x) and Emaciated(x) -> Bifurcate(x, vicky))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, vicky) -> Knife(x, vicky))\nforall x (Knife(x, andria) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, andria) -> Habitable(andria))\n\nBifurcate(vicky, vicky)\n\nUncolumned(vicky) and Emaciated(vicky) and forall x (Uncolumned(x) and Emaciated(x) -> Bifurcate(x, vicky)) -> therefore Bifurcate(vicky, vicky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The aeriel does not chase the angelina. The aeriel is isomeric. The aeriel is embonpoint. The aeriel is delusory. The aeriel is breeding. The aeriel is not stovepiped. The aeriel defy the angelina. The aeriel marbleise the angelina. The angelina parcel the aeriel. The angelina is isomeric. The angelina is embonpoint. The angelina is breeding. The angelina is stovepiped. The angelina defy the aeriel. The angelina marbleise the aeriel. If something marbleise the angelina then the angelina parcel the aeriel. If something marbleise the angelina and it is not stovepiped then the angelina parcel the aeriel. If something is breeding and isomeric then it marbleise the angelina. If something marbleise the angelina then it defy the angelina. If something defy the aeriel then it is embonpoint. If something marbleise the aeriel then the aeriel is embonpoint. The angelina does not see the angelina.", "logic": "\nnot Parcel(aeriel, angelina)\nIsomeric(aeriel)\nEmbonpoint(aeriel)\nDelusory(aeriel)\nBreeding(aeriel)\nnot Stovepiped(aeriel)\nDefy(aeriel, angelina)\nMarbleise(aeriel, angelina)\nParcel(angelina, aeriel)\nIsomeric(angelina)\nEmbonpoint(angelina)\nBreeding(angelina)\nStovepiped(angelina)\nDefy(angelina, aeriel)\nMarbleise(angelina, aeriel)\nforall x (Marbleise(x, angelina) -> Parcel(angelina, aeriel))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, angelina) and not Stovepiped(x) -> Parcel(angelina, aeriel))\nforall x (Breeding(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Marbleise(x, angelina))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, angelina) -> Defy(x, angelina))\nforall x (Defy(x, aeriel) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, aeriel) -> Embonpoint(aeriel))\n\nnot Marbleise(angelina, angelina)\n\nBreeding(angelina) and Isomeric(angelina) and forall x (Breeding(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Marbleise(x, angelina)) -> therefore Marbleise(angelina, angelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The elwyn does not chase the felicia. The elwyn is continuant. The elwyn is cyprinoid. The elwyn is startling. The elwyn is splintery. The elwyn is not educated. The elwyn blubber the felicia. The elwyn gabble the felicia. The felicia conspire the elwyn. The felicia is continuant. The felicia is cyprinoid. The felicia is splintery. The felicia is educated. The felicia blubber the elwyn. The felicia gabble the elwyn. If something gabble the felicia then the felicia conspire the elwyn. If something gabble the felicia and it is not educated then the felicia conspire the elwyn. If something is splintery and continuant then it gabble the felicia. If something gabble the felicia then it blubber the felicia. If something blubber the elwyn then it is cyprinoid. If something gabble the elwyn then the elwyn is cyprinoid. The felicia blubber the felicia.", "logic": "\nnot Conspire(elwyn, felicia)\nContinuant(elwyn)\nCyprinoid(elwyn)\nStartling(elwyn)\nSplintery(elwyn)\nnot Educated(elwyn)\nBlubber(elwyn, felicia)\nGabble(elwyn, felicia)\nConspire(felicia, elwyn)\nContinuant(felicia)\nCyprinoid(felicia)\nSplintery(felicia)\nEducated(felicia)\nBlubber(felicia, elwyn)\nGabble(felicia, elwyn)\nforall x (Gabble(x, felicia) -> Conspire(felicia, elwyn))\nforall x (Gabble(x, felicia) and not Educated(x) -> Conspire(felicia, elwyn))\nforall x (Splintery(x) and Continuant(x) -> Gabble(x, felicia))\nforall x (Gabble(x, felicia) -> Blubber(x, felicia))\nforall x (Blubber(x, elwyn) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Gabble(x, elwyn) -> Cyprinoid(elwyn))\n\nBlubber(felicia, felicia)\n\nSplintery(felicia) and Continuant(felicia) and forall x (Splintery(x) and Continuant(x) -> Gabble(x, felicia)) -> therefore Gabble(felicia, felicia) Gabble(felicia, felicia) and forall x (Gabble(x, felicia) -> Blubber(x, felicia)) -> therefore Blubber(felicia, felicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The alicia does not chase the hayden. The alicia is clenched. The alicia is silvern. The alicia is nontoxic. The alicia is baseborn. The alicia is not alsatian. The alicia panic the hayden. The alicia fatigue the hayden. The hayden spook the alicia. The hayden is clenched. The hayden is silvern. The hayden is baseborn. The hayden is alsatian. The hayden panic the alicia. The hayden fatigue the alicia. If something fatigue the hayden then the hayden spook the alicia. If something fatigue the hayden and it is not alsatian then the hayden spook the alicia. If something is baseborn and clenched then it fatigue the hayden. If something fatigue the hayden then it panic the hayden. If something panic the alicia then it is silvern. If something fatigue the alicia then the alicia is silvern. The hayden does not like the hayden.", "logic": "\nnot Spook(alicia, hayden)\nClenched(alicia)\nSilvern(alicia)\nNontoxic(alicia)\nBaseborn(alicia)\nnot Alsatian(alicia)\nPanic(alicia, hayden)\nFatigue(alicia, hayden)\nSpook(hayden, alicia)\nClenched(hayden)\nSilvern(hayden)\nBaseborn(hayden)\nAlsatian(hayden)\nPanic(hayden, alicia)\nFatigue(hayden, alicia)\nforall x (Fatigue(x, hayden) -> Spook(hayden, alicia))\nforall x (Fatigue(x, hayden) and not Alsatian(x) -> Spook(hayden, alicia))\nforall x (Baseborn(x) and Clenched(x) -> Fatigue(x, hayden))\nforall x (Fatigue(x, hayden) -> Panic(x, hayden))\nforall x (Panic(x, alicia) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Fatigue(x, alicia) -> Silvern(alicia))\n\nnot Panic(hayden, hayden)\n\nBaseborn(hayden) and Clenched(hayden) and forall x (Baseborn(x) and Clenched(x) -> Fatigue(x, hayden)) -> therefore Fatigue(hayden, hayden) Fatigue(hayden, hayden) and forall x (Fatigue(x, hayden) -> Panic(x, hayden)) -> therefore Panic(hayden, hayden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The pamella does not chase the adrianna. The pamella is wingless. The pamella is flyaway. The pamella is starved. The pamella is outcaste. The pamella is not bronze. The pamella hazard the adrianna. The pamella bide the adrianna. The adrianna whisper the pamella. The adrianna is wingless. The adrianna is flyaway. The adrianna is outcaste. The adrianna is bronze. The adrianna hazard the pamella. The adrianna bide the pamella. If something bide the adrianna then the adrianna whisper the pamella. If something bide the adrianna and it is not bronze then the adrianna whisper the pamella. If something is outcaste and wingless then it bide the adrianna. If something bide the adrianna then it hazard the adrianna. If something hazard the pamella then it is flyaway. If something bide the pamella then the pamella is flyaway. The adrianna does not chase the adrianna.", "logic": "\nnot Whisper(pamella, adrianna)\nWingless(pamella)\nFlyaway(pamella)\nStarved(pamella)\nOutcaste(pamella)\nnot Bronze(pamella)\nHazard(pamella, adrianna)\nBide(pamella, adrianna)\nWhisper(adrianna, pamella)\nWingless(adrianna)\nFlyaway(adrianna)\nOutcaste(adrianna)\nBronze(adrianna)\nHazard(adrianna, pamella)\nBide(adrianna, pamella)\nforall x (Bide(x, adrianna) -> Whisper(adrianna, pamella))\nforall x (Bide(x, adrianna) and not Bronze(x) -> Whisper(adrianna, pamella))\nforall x (Outcaste(x) and Wingless(x) -> Bide(x, adrianna))\nforall x (Bide(x, adrianna) -> Hazard(x, adrianna))\nforall x (Hazard(x, pamella) -> Flyaway(x))\nforall x (Bide(x, pamella) -> Flyaway(pamella))\n\nnot Whisper(adrianna, adrianna)\n\nnot Whisper(adrianna, adrianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The mechelle does not chase the gusti. The mechelle is cleft. The mechelle is shellproof. The mechelle is nestorian. The mechelle is sexless. The mechelle is not aggregate. The mechelle vulgarise the gusti. The mechelle wine the gusti. The gusti breed the mechelle. The gusti is cleft. The gusti is shellproof. The gusti is sexless. The gusti is aggregate. The gusti vulgarise the mechelle. The gusti wine the mechelle. If something wine the gusti then the gusti breed the mechelle. If something wine the gusti and it is not aggregate then the gusti breed the mechelle. If something is sexless and cleft then it wine the gusti. If something wine the gusti then it vulgarise the gusti. If something vulgarise the mechelle then it is shellproof. If something wine the mechelle then the mechelle is shellproof. The mechelle breed the mechelle.", "logic": "\nnot Breed(mechelle, gusti)\nCleft(mechelle)\nShellproof(mechelle)\nNestorian(mechelle)\nSexless(mechelle)\nnot Aggregate(mechelle)\nVulgarise(mechelle, gusti)\nWine(mechelle, gusti)\nBreed(gusti, mechelle)\nCleft(gusti)\nShellproof(gusti)\nSexless(gusti)\nAggregate(gusti)\nVulgarise(gusti, mechelle)\nWine(gusti, mechelle)\nforall x (Wine(x, gusti) -> Breed(gusti, mechelle))\nforall x (Wine(x, gusti) and not Aggregate(x) -> Breed(gusti, mechelle))\nforall x (Sexless(x) and Cleft(x) -> Wine(x, gusti))\nforall x (Wine(x, gusti) -> Vulgarise(x, gusti))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, mechelle) -> Shellproof(x))\nforall x (Wine(x, mechelle) -> Shellproof(mechelle))\n\nBreed(mechelle, mechelle)\n\nBreed(mechelle, mechelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The desmund does not chase the tymon. The desmund is berserk. The desmund is unnatural. The desmund is oblate. The desmund is trusty. The desmund is not lamblike. The desmund twig the tymon. The desmund burgeon the tymon. The tymon possess the desmund. The tymon is berserk. The tymon is unnatural. The tymon is trusty. The tymon is lamblike. The tymon twig the desmund. The tymon burgeon the desmund. If something burgeon the tymon then the tymon possess the desmund. If something burgeon the tymon and it is not lamblike then the tymon possess the desmund. If something is trusty and berserk then it burgeon the tymon. If something burgeon the tymon then it twig the tymon. If something twig the desmund then it is unnatural. If something burgeon the desmund then the desmund is unnatural. The desmund does not like the desmund.", "logic": "\nnot Possess(desmund, tymon)\nBerserk(desmund)\nUnnatural(desmund)\nOblate(desmund)\nTrusty(desmund)\nnot Lamblike(desmund)\nTwig(desmund, tymon)\nBurgeon(desmund, tymon)\nPossess(tymon, desmund)\nBerserk(tymon)\nUnnatural(tymon)\nTrusty(tymon)\nLamblike(tymon)\nTwig(tymon, desmund)\nBurgeon(tymon, desmund)\nforall x (Burgeon(x, tymon) -> Possess(tymon, desmund))\nforall x (Burgeon(x, tymon) and not Lamblike(x) -> Possess(tymon, desmund))\nforall x (Trusty(x) and Berserk(x) -> Burgeon(x, tymon))\nforall x (Burgeon(x, tymon) -> Twig(x, tymon))\nforall x (Twig(x, desmund) -> Unnatural(x))\nforall x (Burgeon(x, desmund) -> Unnatural(desmund))\n\nnot Twig(desmund, desmund)\n\nnot Twig(desmund, desmund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "The micheil does not chase the ave. The micheil is coolheaded. The micheil is confirming. The micheil is longtime. The micheil is flattering. The micheil is not auxetic. The micheil lallygag the ave. The micheil hygienise the ave. The ave chirr the micheil. The ave is coolheaded. The ave is confirming. The ave is flattering. The ave is auxetic. The ave lallygag the micheil. The ave hygienise the micheil. If something hygienise the ave then the ave chirr the micheil. If something hygienise the ave and it is not auxetic then the ave chirr the micheil. If something is flattering and coolheaded then it hygienise the ave. If something hygienise the ave then it lallygag the ave. If something lallygag the micheil then it is confirming. If something hygienise the micheil then the micheil is confirming. The micheil hygienise the micheil.", "logic": "\nnot Chirr(micheil, ave)\nCoolheaded(micheil)\nConfirming(micheil)\nLongtime(micheil)\nFlattering(micheil)\nnot Auxetic(micheil)\nLallygag(micheil, ave)\nHygienise(micheil, ave)\nChirr(ave, micheil)\nCoolheaded(ave)\nConfirming(ave)\nFlattering(ave)\nAuxetic(ave)\nLallygag(ave, micheil)\nHygienise(ave, micheil)\nforall x (Hygienise(x, ave) -> Chirr(ave, micheil))\nforall x (Hygienise(x, ave) and not Auxetic(x) -> Chirr(ave, micheil))\nforall x (Flattering(x) and Coolheaded(x) -> Hygienise(x, ave))\nforall x (Hygienise(x, ave) -> Lallygag(x, ave))\nforall x (Lallygag(x, micheil) -> Confirming(x))\nforall x (Hygienise(x, micheil) -> Confirming(micheil))\n\nHygienise(micheil, micheil)\n\nHygienise(micheil, micheil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1200"} {"premises": "Anissa is classical. Kim is classical. Kim is twentieth. All twentieth people are ignorant. If Kim is twentieth then Kim is quenched. If someone is classical and quenched then they are acceptive. Kim is twentieth.", "logic": "\nClassical(anissa)\nClassical(kim)\nTwentieth(kim)\nforall x (Twentieth(x) -> Ignorant(x))\nTwentieth(kim) -> Quenched(kim)\nforall x (Classical(x) and Quenched(x) -> Acceptive(x))\n\nTwentieth(kim)\n\ntherefore Twentieth(kim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Kriste is redbrick. Mimi is redbrick. Mimi is ionian. All ionian people are ruffianly. If Mimi is ionian then Mimi is mural. If someone is redbrick and mural then they are galilean. Mimi is not redbrick.", "logic": "\nRedbrick(kriste)\nRedbrick(mimi)\nIonian(mimi)\nforall x (Ionian(x) -> Ruffianly(x))\nIonian(mimi) -> Mural(mimi)\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and Mural(x) -> Galilean(x))\n\nnot Redbrick(mimi)\n\ntherefore Redbrick(mimi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Marget is renegade. Blancha is renegade. Blancha is mesic. All mesic people are roundabout. If Blancha is mesic then Blancha is requested. If someone is renegade and requested then they are brainish. Blancha is roundabout.", "logic": "\nRenegade(marget)\nRenegade(blancha)\nMesic(blancha)\nforall x (Mesic(x) -> Roundabout(x))\nMesic(blancha) -> Requested(blancha)\nforall x (Renegade(x) and Requested(x) -> Brainish(x))\n\nRoundabout(blancha)\n\nMesic(blancha) and forall x (Mesic(x) -> Roundabout(x)) -> therefore Roundabout(blancha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Abel is cuboidal. Nanice is cuboidal. Nanice is senescent. All senescent people are nitrous. If Nanice is senescent then Nanice is whiny. If someone is cuboidal and whiny then they are mediate. Nanice is not nitrous.", "logic": "\nCuboidal(abel)\nCuboidal(nanice)\nSenescent(nanice)\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> Nitrous(x))\nSenescent(nanice) -> Whiny(nanice)\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) and Whiny(x) -> Mediate(x))\n\nnot Nitrous(nanice)\n\nSenescent(nanice) and forall x (Senescent(x) -> Nitrous(x)) -> therefore Nitrous(nanice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Nela is forceful. Marlon is forceful. Marlon is julian. All julian people are quack. If Marlon is julian then Marlon is husky. If someone is forceful and husky then they are sexed. Marlon is sexed.", "logic": "\nForceful(nela)\nForceful(marlon)\nJulian(marlon)\nforall x (Julian(x) -> Quack(x))\nJulian(marlon) -> Husky(marlon)\nforall x (Forceful(x) and Husky(x) -> Sexed(x))\n\nSexed(marlon)\n\nJulian(marlon) and Julian(marlon) -> Husky(marlon) -> therefore Husky(marlon) Forceful(marlon) and Husky(marlon) and forall x (Forceful(x) and Husky(x) -> Sexed(x)) -> therefore Sexed(marlon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Maure is cetacean. Nichols is cetacean. Nichols is bicapsular. All bicapsular people are careful. If Nichols is bicapsular then Nichols is indulgent. If someone is cetacean and indulgent then they are aghast. Nichols is not aghast.", "logic": "\nCetacean(maure)\nCetacean(nichols)\nBicapsular(nichols)\nforall x (Bicapsular(x) -> Careful(x))\nBicapsular(nichols) -> Indulgent(nichols)\nforall x (Cetacean(x) and Indulgent(x) -> Aghast(x))\n\nnot Aghast(nichols)\n\nBicapsular(nichols) and Bicapsular(nichols) -> Indulgent(nichols) -> therefore Indulgent(nichols) Cetacean(nichols) and Indulgent(nichols) and forall x (Cetacean(x) and Indulgent(x) -> Aghast(x)) -> therefore Aghast(nichols)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Walther is untainted. Darcey is untainted. Darcey is unthematic. All unthematic people are epiphyseal. If Darcey is unthematic then Darcey is aloof. If someone is untainted and aloof then they are unyielding. Walther is not epiphyseal.", "logic": "\nUntainted(walther)\nUntainted(darcey)\nUnthematic(darcey)\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Epiphyseal(x))\nUnthematic(darcey) -> Aloof(darcey)\nforall x (Untainted(x) and Aloof(x) -> Unyielding(x))\n\nnot Epiphyseal(walther)\n\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Epiphyseal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Suellen is hindustani. Hendrick is hindustani. Hendrick is connatural. All connatural people are underage. If Hendrick is connatural then Hendrick is permanent. If someone is hindustani and permanent then they are profuse. Suellen is profuse.", "logic": "\nHindustani(suellen)\nHindustani(hendrick)\nConnatural(hendrick)\nforall x (Connatural(x) -> Underage(x))\nConnatural(hendrick) -> Permanent(hendrick)\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Permanent(x) -> Profuse(x))\n\nProfuse(suellen)\n\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Permanent(x) -> Profuse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Nicoline is fearful. Gabey is fearful. Gabey is ungracious. All ungracious people are motorised. If Gabey is ungracious then Gabey is acidotic. If someone is fearful and acidotic then they are creole. Nicoline is not smart.", "logic": "\nFearful(nicoline)\nFearful(gabey)\nUngracious(gabey)\nforall x (Ungracious(x) -> Motorised(x))\nUngracious(gabey) -> Acidotic(gabey)\nforall x (Fearful(x) and Acidotic(x) -> Creole(x))\n\nnot Smart(nicoline)\n\nnot Smart(nicoline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Ronna is christless. Boniface is christless. Boniface is equestrian. All equestrian people are botanic. If Boniface is equestrian then Boniface is unaccented. If someone is christless and unaccented then they are xciv. Boniface is kind.", "logic": "\nChristless(ronna)\nChristless(boniface)\nEquestrian(boniface)\nforall x (Equestrian(x) -> Botanic(x))\nEquestrian(boniface) -> Unaccented(boniface)\nforall x (Christless(x) and Unaccented(x) -> Xciv(x))\n\nKind(boniface)\n\nKind(boniface) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Karylin is pendulous. Lazaro is pendulous. Lazaro is pelecypod. All pelecypod people are azygous. If Lazaro is pelecypod then Lazaro is animist. If someone is pendulous and animist then they are promising. Karylin is not pelecypod.", "logic": "\nPendulous(karylin)\nPendulous(lazaro)\nPelecypod(lazaro)\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) -> Azygous(x))\nPelecypod(lazaro) -> Animist(lazaro)\nforall x (Pendulous(x) and Animist(x) -> Promising(x))\n\nnot Pelecypod(karylin)\n\nnot Pelecypod(karylin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Karissa is catabatic. Zilvia is catabatic. Zilvia is soupy. All soupy people are wounded. If Zilvia is soupy then Zilvia is anchoritic. If someone is catabatic and anchoritic then they are indictable. Karissa is anchoritic.", "logic": "\nCatabatic(karissa)\nCatabatic(zilvia)\nSoupy(zilvia)\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Wounded(x))\nSoupy(zilvia) -> Anchoritic(zilvia)\nforall x (Catabatic(x) and Anchoritic(x) -> Indictable(x))\n\nAnchoritic(karissa)\n\nAnchoritic(karissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-291"} {"premises": "Cheri is cutaneal. Cheri is lamenting. Cheri is kantian. Jodie is cutaneal. Jodie is burdened. Jodie is lamenting. Jodie is expired. Mel is frigid. Mel is lamenting. Mel is lobate. Lillis is cutaneal. Lillis is frigid. Lillis is lobate. Lillis is expired. Lillis is kantian. Nice people are lobate. If someone is lobate then they are kantian. Mel is lobate.", "logic": "\nCutaneal(cheri)\nLamenting(cheri)\nKantian(cheri)\nCutaneal(jodie)\nBurdened(jodie)\nLamenting(jodie)\nExpired(jodie)\nFrigid(mel)\nLamenting(mel)\nLobate(mel)\nCutaneal(lillis)\nFrigid(lillis)\nLobate(lillis)\nExpired(lillis)\nKantian(lillis)\nforall x (Lamenting(x) -> Lobate(x))\nforall x (Lobate(x) -> Kantian(x))\n\nLobate(mel)\n\ntherefore Lobate(mel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Berni is certified. Berni is pilose. Berni is indecorous. Lockwood is certified. Lockwood is soigne. Lockwood is pilose. Lockwood is reluctant. Cobb is sapient. Cobb is pilose. Cobb is healthier. Christel is certified. Christel is sapient. Christel is healthier. Christel is reluctant. Christel is indecorous. Nice people are healthier. If someone is healthier then they are indecorous. Cobb is not pilose.", "logic": "\nCertified(berni)\nPilose(berni)\nIndecorous(berni)\nCertified(lockwood)\nSoigne(lockwood)\nPilose(lockwood)\nReluctant(lockwood)\nSapient(cobb)\nPilose(cobb)\nHealthier(cobb)\nCertified(christel)\nSapient(christel)\nHealthier(christel)\nReluctant(christel)\nIndecorous(christel)\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Healthier(x))\nforall x (Healthier(x) -> Indecorous(x))\n\nnot Pilose(cobb)\n\ntherefore Pilose(cobb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Jean is reasoned. Jean is quondam. Jean is thinkable. Abdullah is reasoned. Abdullah is sissyish. Abdullah is quondam. Abdullah is advertised. Roddie is ivied. Roddie is quondam. Roddie is bipartisan. Opal is reasoned. Opal is ivied. Opal is bipartisan. Opal is advertised. Opal is thinkable. Nice people are bipartisan. If someone is bipartisan then they are thinkable. Roddie is thinkable.", "logic": "\nReasoned(jean)\nQuondam(jean)\nThinkable(jean)\nReasoned(abdullah)\nSissyish(abdullah)\nQuondam(abdullah)\nAdvertised(abdullah)\nIvied(roddie)\nQuondam(roddie)\nBipartisan(roddie)\nReasoned(opal)\nIvied(opal)\nBipartisan(opal)\nAdvertised(opal)\nThinkable(opal)\nforall x (Quondam(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Thinkable(x))\n\nThinkable(roddie)\n\nBipartisan(roddie) and forall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Thinkable(x)) -> therefore Thinkable(roddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Matthus is overseas. Matthus is arthurian. Matthus is dolabrate. Ramona is overseas. Ramona is bifurcated. Ramona is arthurian. Ramona is overstrung. Lotti is mesodermal. Lotti is arthurian. Lotti is provincial. Gretta is overseas. Gretta is mesodermal. Gretta is provincial. Gretta is overstrung. Gretta is dolabrate. Nice people are provincial. If someone is provincial then they are dolabrate. Ramona is not provincial.", "logic": "\nOverseas(matthus)\nArthurian(matthus)\nDolabrate(matthus)\nOverseas(ramona)\nBifurcated(ramona)\nArthurian(ramona)\nOverstrung(ramona)\nMesodermal(lotti)\nArthurian(lotti)\nProvincial(lotti)\nOverseas(gretta)\nMesodermal(gretta)\nProvincial(gretta)\nOverstrung(gretta)\nDolabrate(gretta)\nforall x (Arthurian(x) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Dolabrate(x))\n\nnot Provincial(ramona)\n\nArthurian(ramona) and forall x (Arthurian(x) -> Provincial(x)) -> therefore Provincial(ramona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Wiatt is insectan. Wiatt is undismayed. Wiatt is homebound. Thorndike is insectan. Thorndike is victorious. Thorndike is undismayed. Thorndike is dependant. Thaine is largo. Thaine is undismayed. Thaine is sceptred. Connor is insectan. Connor is largo. Connor is sceptred. Connor is dependant. Connor is homebound. Nice people are sceptred. If someone is sceptred then they are homebound. Thorndike is homebound.", "logic": "\nInsectan(wiatt)\nUndismayed(wiatt)\nHomebound(wiatt)\nInsectan(thorndike)\nVictorious(thorndike)\nUndismayed(thorndike)\nDependant(thorndike)\nLargo(thaine)\nUndismayed(thaine)\nSceptred(thaine)\nInsectan(connor)\nLargo(connor)\nSceptred(connor)\nDependant(connor)\nHomebound(connor)\nforall x (Undismayed(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Sceptred(x) -> Homebound(x))\n\nHomebound(thorndike)\n\nUndismayed(thorndike) and forall x (Undismayed(x) -> Sceptred(x)) -> therefore Sceptred(thorndike) Sceptred(thorndike) and forall x (Sceptred(x) -> Homebound(x)) -> therefore Homebound(thorndike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Shell is unswept. Shell is hogged. Shell is seafaring. Wilden is unswept. Wilden is elect. Wilden is hogged. Wilden is satiate. Justina is hindustani. Justina is hogged. Justina is branching. Priscilla is unswept. Priscilla is hindustani. Priscilla is branching. Priscilla is satiate. Priscilla is seafaring. Nice people are branching. If someone is branching then they are seafaring. Wilden is not seafaring.", "logic": "\nUnswept(shell)\nHogged(shell)\nSeafaring(shell)\nUnswept(wilden)\nElect(wilden)\nHogged(wilden)\nSatiate(wilden)\nHindustani(justina)\nHogged(justina)\nBranching(justina)\nUnswept(priscilla)\nHindustani(priscilla)\nBranching(priscilla)\nSatiate(priscilla)\nSeafaring(priscilla)\nforall x (Hogged(x) -> Branching(x))\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Seafaring(x))\n\nnot Seafaring(wilden)\n\nHogged(wilden) and forall x (Hogged(x) -> Branching(x)) -> therefore Branching(wilden) Branching(wilden) and forall x (Branching(x) -> Seafaring(x)) -> therefore Seafaring(wilden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Linn is awakened. Linn is weakened. Linn is monistic. Orville is awakened. Orville is enervating. Orville is weakened. Orville is apposite. Lilly is spirant. Lilly is weakened. Lilly is reportable. Justina is awakened. Justina is spirant. Justina is reportable. Justina is apposite. Justina is monistic. Nice people are reportable. If someone is reportable then they are monistic. Justina is not enervating.", "logic": "\nAwakened(linn)\nWeakened(linn)\nMonistic(linn)\nAwakened(orville)\nEnervating(orville)\nWeakened(orville)\nApposite(orville)\nSpirant(lilly)\nWeakened(lilly)\nReportable(lilly)\nAwakened(justina)\nSpirant(justina)\nReportable(justina)\nApposite(justina)\nMonistic(justina)\nforall x (Weakened(x) -> Reportable(x))\nforall x (Reportable(x) -> Monistic(x))\n\nnot Enervating(justina)\n\nnot Enervating(justina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Blancha is snug. Blancha is smoking. Blancha is credible. Ailee is snug. Ailee is devoted. Ailee is smoking. Ailee is crowded. Latrina is grizzled. Latrina is smoking. Latrina is catching. Mikako is snug. Mikako is grizzled. Mikako is catching. Mikako is crowded. Mikako is credible. Nice people are catching. If someone is catching then they are credible. Latrina is snug.", "logic": "\nSnug(blancha)\nSmoking(blancha)\nCredible(blancha)\nSnug(ailee)\nDevoted(ailee)\nSmoking(ailee)\nCrowded(ailee)\nGrizzled(latrina)\nSmoking(latrina)\nCatching(latrina)\nSnug(mikako)\nGrizzled(mikako)\nCatching(mikako)\nCrowded(mikako)\nCredible(mikako)\nforall x (Smoking(x) -> Catching(x))\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Credible(x))\n\nSnug(latrina)\n\nSnug(latrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Edithe is vertebral. Edithe is lordless. Edithe is unenforced. Rori is vertebral. Rori is flagitious. Rori is lordless. Rori is naiant. Wynnie is blithe. Wynnie is lordless. Wynnie is augitic. Erl is vertebral. Erl is blithe. Erl is augitic. Erl is naiant. Erl is unenforced. Nice people are augitic. If someone is augitic then they are unenforced. Wynnie is not naiant.", "logic": "\nVertebral(edithe)\nLordless(edithe)\nUnenforced(edithe)\nVertebral(rori)\nFlagitious(rori)\nLordless(rori)\nNaiant(rori)\nBlithe(wynnie)\nLordless(wynnie)\nAugitic(wynnie)\nVertebral(erl)\nBlithe(erl)\nAugitic(erl)\nNaiant(erl)\nUnenforced(erl)\nforall x (Lordless(x) -> Augitic(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Unenforced(x))\n\nnot Naiant(wynnie)\n\nnot Naiant(wynnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Allianora is truculent. Allianora is pianistic. Allianora is cloisonne. Mairead is truculent. Mairead is seamed. Mairead is pianistic. Mairead is saintlike. Anabella is arched. Anabella is pianistic. Anabella is dinky. Heida is truculent. Heida is arched. Heida is dinky. Heida is saintlike. Heida is cloisonne. Nice people are dinky. If someone is dinky then they are cloisonne. Allianora is seamed.", "logic": "\nTruculent(allianora)\nPianistic(allianora)\nCloisonne(allianora)\nTruculent(mairead)\nSeamed(mairead)\nPianistic(mairead)\nSaintlike(mairead)\nArched(anabella)\nPianistic(anabella)\nDinky(anabella)\nTruculent(heida)\nArched(heida)\nDinky(heida)\nSaintlike(heida)\nCloisonne(heida)\nforall x (Pianistic(x) -> Dinky(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\n\nSeamed(allianora)\n\nSeamed(allianora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Lisa is occupied. Lisa is spoiled. Lisa is automatic. Tracey is occupied. Tracey is roadless. Tracey is spoiled. Tracey is canonical. Moreen is tactual. Moreen is spoiled. Moreen is quartzose. Doyle is occupied. Doyle is tactual. Doyle is quartzose. Doyle is canonical. Doyle is automatic. Nice people are quartzose. If someone is quartzose then they are automatic. Lisa is not tactual.", "logic": "\nOccupied(lisa)\nSpoiled(lisa)\nAutomatic(lisa)\nOccupied(tracey)\nRoadless(tracey)\nSpoiled(tracey)\nCanonical(tracey)\nTactual(moreen)\nSpoiled(moreen)\nQuartzose(moreen)\nOccupied(doyle)\nTactual(doyle)\nQuartzose(doyle)\nCanonical(doyle)\nAutomatic(doyle)\nforall x (Spoiled(x) -> Quartzose(x))\nforall x (Quartzose(x) -> Automatic(x))\n\nnot Tactual(lisa)\n\nnot Tactual(lisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "Verena is lowbrowed. Verena is hungry. Verena is pelecypod. Gayleen is lowbrowed. Gayleen is destroyed. Gayleen is hungry. Gayleen is militant. Emmery is dead. Emmery is hungry. Emmery is crenulate. Geraldo is lowbrowed. Geraldo is dead. Geraldo is crenulate. Geraldo is militant. Geraldo is pelecypod. Nice people are crenulate. If someone is crenulate then they are pelecypod. Geraldo is hungry.", "logic": "\nLowbrowed(verena)\nHungry(verena)\nPelecypod(verena)\nLowbrowed(gayleen)\nDestroyed(gayleen)\nHungry(gayleen)\nMilitant(gayleen)\nDead(emmery)\nHungry(emmery)\nCrenulate(emmery)\nLowbrowed(geraldo)\nDead(geraldo)\nCrenulate(geraldo)\nMilitant(geraldo)\nPelecypod(geraldo)\nforall x (Hungry(x) -> Crenulate(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Pelecypod(x))\n\nHungry(geraldo)\n\nHungry(geraldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1863"} {"premises": "The herb celebrate the kirsten. The herb celebrate the cyb. The herb is welfarist. The herb strut the cyb. The herb barrack the ilana. The herb barrack the kirsten. The ilana is ossified. The ilana strut the cyb. The kirsten is lipophilic. The kirsten is ramate. The kirsten is welfarist. The kirsten barrack the ilana. The cyb celebrate the herb. The cyb celebrate the kirsten. The cyb strut the kirsten. If the herb barrack the kirsten then the kirsten barrack the cyb. If someone celebrate the herb and they are welfarist then the herb is lipophilic. If someone strut the cyb and they are ramate then they chase the ilana. If someone is ossified then they see the kirsten. If the cyb strut the kirsten and the kirsten barrack the cyb then the cyb barrack the herb. If someone celebrate the kirsten and they chase the herb then the kirsten strut the herb. If someone celebrate the herb then they are ossified. If someone barrack the ilana then they visit the herb. The herb celebrate the kirsten.", "logic": "\nCelebrate(herb, kirsten)\nCelebrate(herb, cyb)\nWelfarist(herb)\nStrut(herb, cyb)\nBarrack(herb, ilana)\nBarrack(herb, kirsten)\nOssified(ilana)\nStrut(ilana, cyb)\nLipophilic(kirsten)\nRamate(kirsten)\nWelfarist(kirsten)\nBarrack(kirsten, ilana)\nCelebrate(cyb, herb)\nCelebrate(cyb, kirsten)\nStrut(cyb, kirsten)\nBarrack(herb, kirsten) -> Barrack(kirsten, cyb)\nforall x (Celebrate(x, herb) and Welfarist(x) -> Lipophilic(herb))\nforall x (Strut(x, cyb) and Ramate(x) -> Celebrate(x, ilana))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Strut(x, kirsten))\nStrut(cyb, kirsten) and Barrack(kirsten, cyb) -> Barrack(cyb, herb)\nforall x (Celebrate(x, kirsten) and Celebrate(x, herb) -> Strut(kirsten, herb))\nforall x (Celebrate(x, herb) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Barrack(x, ilana) -> Barrack(x, herb))\n\nCelebrate(herb, kirsten)\n\ntherefore Celebrate(herb, kirsten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The nissy disrupt the ruperto. The nissy disrupt the lacy. The nissy is coquettish. The nissy manacle the lacy. The nissy reply the taryn. The nissy reply the ruperto. The taryn is indigent. The taryn manacle the lacy. The ruperto is functional. The ruperto is aching. The ruperto is coquettish. The ruperto reply the taryn. The lacy disrupt the nissy. The lacy disrupt the ruperto. The lacy manacle the ruperto. If the nissy reply the ruperto then the ruperto reply the lacy. If someone disrupt the nissy and they are coquettish then the nissy is functional. If someone manacle the lacy and they are aching then they chase the taryn. If someone is indigent then they see the ruperto. If the lacy manacle the ruperto and the ruperto reply the lacy then the lacy reply the nissy. If someone disrupt the ruperto and they chase the nissy then the ruperto manacle the nissy. If someone disrupt the nissy then they are indigent. If someone reply the taryn then they visit the nissy. The lacy does not see the ruperto.", "logic": "\nDisrupt(nissy, ruperto)\nDisrupt(nissy, lacy)\nCoquettish(nissy)\nManacle(nissy, lacy)\nReply(nissy, taryn)\nReply(nissy, ruperto)\nIndigent(taryn)\nManacle(taryn, lacy)\nFunctional(ruperto)\nAching(ruperto)\nCoquettish(ruperto)\nReply(ruperto, taryn)\nDisrupt(lacy, nissy)\nDisrupt(lacy, ruperto)\nManacle(lacy, ruperto)\nReply(nissy, ruperto) -> Reply(ruperto, lacy)\nforall x (Disrupt(x, nissy) and Coquettish(x) -> Functional(nissy))\nforall x (Manacle(x, lacy) and Aching(x) -> Disrupt(x, taryn))\nforall x (Indigent(x) -> Manacle(x, ruperto))\nManacle(lacy, ruperto) and Reply(ruperto, lacy) -> Reply(lacy, nissy)\nforall x (Disrupt(x, ruperto) and Disrupt(x, nissy) -> Manacle(ruperto, nissy))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, nissy) -> Indigent(x))\nforall x (Reply(x, taryn) -> Reply(x, nissy))\n\nnot Manacle(lacy, ruperto)\n\ntherefore Manacle(lacy, ruperto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The shumeet sear the con. The shumeet sear the talbert. The shumeet is neglectful. The shumeet cant the talbert. The shumeet collate the yancy. The shumeet collate the con. The yancy is squiggly. The yancy cant the talbert. The con is genetic. The con is prosthetic. The con is neglectful. The con collate the yancy. The talbert sear the shumeet. The talbert sear the con. The talbert cant the con. If the shumeet collate the con then the con collate the talbert. If someone sear the shumeet and they are neglectful then the shumeet is genetic. If someone cant the talbert and they are prosthetic then they chase the yancy. If someone is squiggly then they see the con. If the talbert cant the con and the con collate the talbert then the talbert collate the shumeet. If someone sear the con and they chase the shumeet then the con cant the shumeet. If someone sear the shumeet then they are squiggly. If someone collate the yancy then they visit the shumeet. The talbert is squiggly.", "logic": "\nSear(shumeet, con)\nSear(shumeet, talbert)\nNeglectful(shumeet)\nCant(shumeet, talbert)\nCollate(shumeet, yancy)\nCollate(shumeet, con)\nSquiggly(yancy)\nCant(yancy, talbert)\nGenetic(con)\nProsthetic(con)\nNeglectful(con)\nCollate(con, yancy)\nSear(talbert, shumeet)\nSear(talbert, con)\nCant(talbert, con)\nCollate(shumeet, con) -> Collate(con, talbert)\nforall x (Sear(x, shumeet) and Neglectful(x) -> Genetic(shumeet))\nforall x (Cant(x, talbert) and Prosthetic(x) -> Sear(x, yancy))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Cant(x, con))\nCant(talbert, con) and Collate(con, talbert) -> Collate(talbert, shumeet)\nforall x (Sear(x, con) and Sear(x, shumeet) -> Cant(con, shumeet))\nforall x (Sear(x, shumeet) -> Squiggly(x))\nforall x (Collate(x, yancy) -> Collate(x, shumeet))\n\nSquiggly(talbert)\n\nSear(talbert, shumeet) and forall x (Sear(x, shumeet) -> Squiggly(x)) -> therefore Squiggly(talbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The timotheus urge the pippa. The timotheus urge the latrena. The timotheus is unservile. The timotheus sire the latrena. The timotheus dong the hubert. The timotheus dong the pippa. The hubert is susurrous. The hubert sire the latrena. The pippa is sadistic. The pippa is rentable. The pippa is unservile. The pippa dong the hubert. The latrena urge the timotheus. The latrena urge the pippa. The latrena sire the pippa. If the timotheus dong the pippa then the pippa dong the latrena. If someone urge the timotheus and they are unservile then the timotheus is sadistic. If someone sire the latrena and they are rentable then they chase the hubert. If someone is susurrous then they see the pippa. If the latrena sire the pippa and the pippa dong the latrena then the latrena dong the timotheus. If someone urge the pippa and they chase the timotheus then the pippa sire the timotheus. If someone urge the timotheus then they are susurrous. If someone dong the hubert then they visit the timotheus. The latrena is not susurrous.", "logic": "\nUrge(timotheus, pippa)\nUrge(timotheus, latrena)\nUnservile(timotheus)\nSire(timotheus, latrena)\nDong(timotheus, hubert)\nDong(timotheus, pippa)\nSusurrous(hubert)\nSire(hubert, latrena)\nSadistic(pippa)\nRentable(pippa)\nUnservile(pippa)\nDong(pippa, hubert)\nUrge(latrena, timotheus)\nUrge(latrena, pippa)\nSire(latrena, pippa)\nDong(timotheus, pippa) -> Dong(pippa, latrena)\nforall x (Urge(x, timotheus) and Unservile(x) -> Sadistic(timotheus))\nforall x (Sire(x, latrena) and Rentable(x) -> Urge(x, hubert))\nforall x (Susurrous(x) -> Sire(x, pippa))\nSire(latrena, pippa) and Dong(pippa, latrena) -> Dong(latrena, timotheus)\nforall x (Urge(x, pippa) and Urge(x, timotheus) -> Sire(pippa, timotheus))\nforall x (Urge(x, timotheus) -> Susurrous(x))\nforall x (Dong(x, hubert) -> Dong(x, timotheus))\n\nnot Susurrous(latrena)\n\nUrge(latrena, timotheus) and forall x (Urge(x, timotheus) -> Susurrous(x)) -> therefore Susurrous(latrena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The dione unteach the faythe. The dione unteach the dody. The dione is spry. The dione mouth the dody. The dione alibi the doretta. The dione alibi the faythe. The doretta is pyrogenic. The doretta mouth the dody. The faythe is surprising. The faythe is derelict. The faythe is spry. The faythe alibi the doretta. The dody unteach the dione. The dody unteach the faythe. The dody mouth the faythe. If the dione alibi the faythe then the faythe alibi the dody. If someone unteach the dione and they are spry then the dione is surprising. If someone mouth the dody and they are derelict then they chase the doretta. If someone is pyrogenic then they see the faythe. If the dody mouth the faythe and the faythe alibi the dody then the dody alibi the dione. If someone unteach the faythe and they chase the dione then the faythe mouth the dione. If someone unteach the dione then they are pyrogenic. If someone alibi the doretta then they visit the dione. The dody alibi the dione.", "logic": "\nUnteach(dione, faythe)\nUnteach(dione, dody)\nSpry(dione)\nMouth(dione, dody)\nAlibi(dione, doretta)\nAlibi(dione, faythe)\nPyrogenic(doretta)\nMouth(doretta, dody)\nSurprising(faythe)\nDerelict(faythe)\nSpry(faythe)\nAlibi(faythe, doretta)\nUnteach(dody, dione)\nUnteach(dody, faythe)\nMouth(dody, faythe)\nAlibi(dione, faythe) -> Alibi(faythe, dody)\nforall x (Unteach(x, dione) and Spry(x) -> Surprising(dione))\nforall x (Mouth(x, dody) and Derelict(x) -> Unteach(x, doretta))\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) -> Mouth(x, faythe))\nMouth(dody, faythe) and Alibi(faythe, dody) -> Alibi(dody, dione)\nforall x (Unteach(x, faythe) and Unteach(x, dione) -> Mouth(faythe, dione))\nforall x (Unteach(x, dione) -> Pyrogenic(x))\nforall x (Alibi(x, doretta) -> Alibi(x, dione))\n\nAlibi(dody, dione)\n\nAlibi(dione, faythe) and Alibi(dione, faythe) -> Alibi(faythe, dody) -> therefore Alibi(faythe, dody) Mouth(dody, faythe) and Alibi(faythe, dody) and Mouth(dody, faythe) and Alibi(faythe, dody) -> Alibi(dody, dione) -> therefore Alibi(dody, dione)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The priscilla outstare the giacinta. The priscilla outstare the trip. The priscilla is amylolytic. The priscilla pollard the trip. The priscilla group the birdie. The priscilla group the giacinta. The birdie is nestled. The birdie pollard the trip. The giacinta is disjunct. The giacinta is mournful. The giacinta is amylolytic. The giacinta group the birdie. The trip outstare the priscilla. The trip outstare the giacinta. The trip pollard the giacinta. If the priscilla group the giacinta then the giacinta group the trip. If someone outstare the priscilla and they are amylolytic then the priscilla is disjunct. If someone pollard the trip and they are mournful then they chase the birdie. If someone is nestled then they see the giacinta. If the trip pollard the giacinta and the giacinta group the trip then the trip group the priscilla. If someone outstare the giacinta and they chase the priscilla then the giacinta pollard the priscilla. If someone outstare the priscilla then they are nestled. If someone group the birdie then they visit the priscilla. The trip does not visit the priscilla.", "logic": "\nOutstare(priscilla, giacinta)\nOutstare(priscilla, trip)\nAmylolytic(priscilla)\nPollard(priscilla, trip)\nGroup(priscilla, birdie)\nGroup(priscilla, giacinta)\nNestled(birdie)\nPollard(birdie, trip)\nDisjunct(giacinta)\nMournful(giacinta)\nAmylolytic(giacinta)\nGroup(giacinta, birdie)\nOutstare(trip, priscilla)\nOutstare(trip, giacinta)\nPollard(trip, giacinta)\nGroup(priscilla, giacinta) -> Group(giacinta, trip)\nforall x (Outstare(x, priscilla) and Amylolytic(x) -> Disjunct(priscilla))\nforall x (Pollard(x, trip) and Mournful(x) -> Outstare(x, birdie))\nforall x (Nestled(x) -> Pollard(x, giacinta))\nPollard(trip, giacinta) and Group(giacinta, trip) -> Group(trip, priscilla)\nforall x (Outstare(x, giacinta) and Outstare(x, priscilla) -> Pollard(giacinta, priscilla))\nforall x (Outstare(x, priscilla) -> Nestled(x))\nforall x (Group(x, birdie) -> Group(x, priscilla))\n\nnot Group(trip, priscilla)\n\nGroup(priscilla, giacinta) and Group(priscilla, giacinta) -> Group(giacinta, trip) -> therefore Group(giacinta, trip) Pollard(trip, giacinta) and Group(giacinta, trip) and Pollard(trip, giacinta) and Group(giacinta, trip) -> Group(trip, priscilla) -> therefore Group(trip, priscilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The pate swerve the hale. The pate swerve the barry. The pate is satirical. The pate subvent the barry. The pate draw the marabel. The pate draw the hale. The marabel is swayback. The marabel subvent the barry. The hale is cathedral. The hale is moralistic. The hale is satirical. The hale draw the marabel. The barry swerve the pate. The barry swerve the hale. The barry subvent the hale. If the pate draw the hale then the hale draw the barry. If someone swerve the pate and they are satirical then the pate is cathedral. If someone subvent the barry and they are moralistic then they chase the marabel. If someone is swayback then they see the hale. If the barry subvent the hale and the hale draw the barry then the barry draw the pate. If someone swerve the hale and they chase the pate then the hale subvent the pate. If someone swerve the pate then they are swayback. If someone draw the marabel then they visit the pate. The pate is not swayback.", "logic": "\nSwerve(pate, hale)\nSwerve(pate, barry)\nSatirical(pate)\nSubvent(pate, barry)\nDraw(pate, marabel)\nDraw(pate, hale)\nSwayback(marabel)\nSubvent(marabel, barry)\nCathedral(hale)\nMoralistic(hale)\nSatirical(hale)\nDraw(hale, marabel)\nSwerve(barry, pate)\nSwerve(barry, hale)\nSubvent(barry, hale)\nDraw(pate, hale) -> Draw(hale, barry)\nforall x (Swerve(x, pate) and Satirical(x) -> Cathedral(pate))\nforall x (Subvent(x, barry) and Moralistic(x) -> Swerve(x, marabel))\nforall x (Swayback(x) -> Subvent(x, hale))\nSubvent(barry, hale) and Draw(hale, barry) -> Draw(barry, pate)\nforall x (Swerve(x, hale) and Swerve(x, pate) -> Subvent(hale, pate))\nforall x (Swerve(x, pate) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Draw(x, marabel) -> Draw(x, pate))\n\nnot Swayback(pate)\n\nforall x (Swerve(x, pate) -> Swayback(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The tamra beggar the edythe. The tamra beggar the barbie. The tamra is feverous. The tamra insulate the barbie. The tamra surfeit the lela. The tamra surfeit the edythe. The lela is awkward. The lela insulate the barbie. The edythe is tangential. The edythe is fifteenth. The edythe is feverous. The edythe surfeit the lela. The barbie beggar the tamra. The barbie beggar the edythe. The barbie insulate the edythe. If the tamra surfeit the edythe then the edythe surfeit the barbie. If someone beggar the tamra and they are feverous then the tamra is tangential. If someone insulate the barbie and they are fifteenth then they chase the lela. If someone is awkward then they see the edythe. If the barbie insulate the edythe and the edythe surfeit the barbie then the barbie surfeit the tamra. If someone beggar the edythe and they chase the tamra then the edythe insulate the tamra. If someone beggar the tamra then they are awkward. If someone surfeit the lela then they visit the tamra. The barbie beggar the lela.", "logic": "\nBeggar(tamra, edythe)\nBeggar(tamra, barbie)\nFeverous(tamra)\nInsulate(tamra, barbie)\nSurfeit(tamra, lela)\nSurfeit(tamra, edythe)\nAwkward(lela)\nInsulate(lela, barbie)\nTangential(edythe)\nFifteenth(edythe)\nFeverous(edythe)\nSurfeit(edythe, lela)\nBeggar(barbie, tamra)\nBeggar(barbie, edythe)\nInsulate(barbie, edythe)\nSurfeit(tamra, edythe) -> Surfeit(edythe, barbie)\nforall x (Beggar(x, tamra) and Feverous(x) -> Tangential(tamra))\nforall x (Insulate(x, barbie) and Fifteenth(x) -> Beggar(x, lela))\nforall x (Awkward(x) -> Insulate(x, edythe))\nInsulate(barbie, edythe) and Surfeit(edythe, barbie) -> Surfeit(barbie, tamra)\nforall x (Beggar(x, edythe) and Beggar(x, tamra) -> Insulate(edythe, tamra))\nforall x (Beggar(x, tamra) -> Awkward(x))\nforall x (Surfeit(x, lela) -> Surfeit(x, tamra))\n\nBeggar(barbie, lela)\n\nforall x (Insulate(x, barbie) and Fifteenth(x) -> Beggar(x, lela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The rochella virilize the derrick. The rochella virilize the ardelle. The rochella is usable. The rochella pitch the ardelle. The rochella clang the abigale. The rochella clang the derrick. The abigale is wholesome. The abigale pitch the ardelle. The derrick is odorless. The derrick is concerned. The derrick is usable. The derrick clang the abigale. The ardelle virilize the rochella. The ardelle virilize the derrick. The ardelle pitch the derrick. If the rochella clang the derrick then the derrick clang the ardelle. If someone virilize the rochella and they are usable then the rochella is odorless. If someone pitch the ardelle and they are concerned then they chase the abigale. If someone is wholesome then they see the derrick. If the ardelle pitch the derrick and the derrick clang the ardelle then the ardelle clang the rochella. If someone virilize the derrick and they chase the rochella then the derrick pitch the rochella. If someone virilize the rochella then they are wholesome. If someone clang the abigale then they visit the rochella. The rochella is not odorless.", "logic": "\nVirilize(rochella, derrick)\nVirilize(rochella, ardelle)\nUsable(rochella)\nPitch(rochella, ardelle)\nClang(rochella, abigale)\nClang(rochella, derrick)\nWholesome(abigale)\nPitch(abigale, ardelle)\nOdorless(derrick)\nConcerned(derrick)\nUsable(derrick)\nClang(derrick, abigale)\nVirilize(ardelle, rochella)\nVirilize(ardelle, derrick)\nPitch(ardelle, derrick)\nClang(rochella, derrick) -> Clang(derrick, ardelle)\nforall x (Virilize(x, rochella) and Usable(x) -> Odorless(rochella))\nforall x (Pitch(x, ardelle) and Concerned(x) -> Virilize(x, abigale))\nforall x (Wholesome(x) -> Pitch(x, derrick))\nPitch(ardelle, derrick) and Clang(derrick, ardelle) -> Clang(ardelle, rochella)\nforall x (Virilize(x, derrick) and Virilize(x, rochella) -> Pitch(derrick, rochella))\nforall x (Virilize(x, rochella) -> Wholesome(x))\nforall x (Clang(x, abigale) -> Clang(x, rochella))\n\nnot Odorless(rochella)\n\nforall x (Virilize(x, rochella) and Usable(x) -> Odorless(rochella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The orazio include the nicky. The orazio include the lionello. The orazio is snappish. The orazio sodomise the lionello. The orazio precess the xaviera. The orazio precess the nicky. The xaviera is wrong. The xaviera sodomise the lionello. The nicky is masterly. The nicky is cubic. The nicky is snappish. The nicky precess the xaviera. The lionello include the orazio. The lionello include the nicky. The lionello sodomise the nicky. If the orazio precess the nicky then the nicky precess the lionello. If someone include the orazio and they are snappish then the orazio is masterly. If someone sodomise the lionello and they are cubic then they chase the xaviera. If someone is wrong then they see the nicky. If the lionello sodomise the nicky and the nicky precess the lionello then the lionello precess the orazio. If someone include the nicky and they chase the orazio then the nicky sodomise the orazio. If someone include the orazio then they are wrong. If someone precess the xaviera then they visit the orazio. The nicky include the orazio.", "logic": "\nInclude(orazio, nicky)\nInclude(orazio, lionello)\nSnappish(orazio)\nSodomise(orazio, lionello)\nPrecess(orazio, xaviera)\nPrecess(orazio, nicky)\nWrong(xaviera)\nSodomise(xaviera, lionello)\nMasterly(nicky)\nCubic(nicky)\nSnappish(nicky)\nPrecess(nicky, xaviera)\nInclude(lionello, orazio)\nInclude(lionello, nicky)\nSodomise(lionello, nicky)\nPrecess(orazio, nicky) -> Precess(nicky, lionello)\nforall x (Include(x, orazio) and Snappish(x) -> Masterly(orazio))\nforall x (Sodomise(x, lionello) and Cubic(x) -> Include(x, xaviera))\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Sodomise(x, nicky))\nSodomise(lionello, nicky) and Precess(nicky, lionello) -> Precess(lionello, orazio)\nforall x (Include(x, nicky) and Include(x, orazio) -> Sodomise(nicky, orazio))\nforall x (Include(x, orazio) -> Wrong(x))\nforall x (Precess(x, xaviera) -> Precess(x, orazio))\n\nInclude(nicky, orazio)\n\nInclude(nicky, orazio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The cristi scribe the jasmine. The cristi scribe the sybyl. The cristi is uraemic. The cristi deflate the sybyl. The cristi flower the anatole. The cristi flower the jasmine. The anatole is devalued. The anatole deflate the sybyl. The jasmine is fanned. The jasmine is unfurrowed. The jasmine is uraemic. The jasmine flower the anatole. The sybyl scribe the cristi. The sybyl scribe the jasmine. The sybyl deflate the jasmine. If the cristi flower the jasmine then the jasmine flower the sybyl. If someone scribe the cristi and they are uraemic then the cristi is fanned. If someone deflate the sybyl and they are unfurrowed then they chase the anatole. If someone is devalued then they see the jasmine. If the sybyl deflate the jasmine and the jasmine flower the sybyl then the sybyl flower the cristi. If someone scribe the jasmine and they chase the cristi then the jasmine deflate the cristi. If someone scribe the cristi then they are devalued. If someone flower the anatole then they visit the cristi. The cristi is not unfurrowed.", "logic": "\nScribe(cristi, jasmine)\nScribe(cristi, sybyl)\nUraemic(cristi)\nDeflate(cristi, sybyl)\nFlower(cristi, anatole)\nFlower(cristi, jasmine)\nDevalued(anatole)\nDeflate(anatole, sybyl)\nFanned(jasmine)\nUnfurrowed(jasmine)\nUraemic(jasmine)\nFlower(jasmine, anatole)\nScribe(sybyl, cristi)\nScribe(sybyl, jasmine)\nDeflate(sybyl, jasmine)\nFlower(cristi, jasmine) -> Flower(jasmine, sybyl)\nforall x (Scribe(x, cristi) and Uraemic(x) -> Fanned(cristi))\nforall x (Deflate(x, sybyl) and Unfurrowed(x) -> Scribe(x, anatole))\nforall x (Devalued(x) -> Deflate(x, jasmine))\nDeflate(sybyl, jasmine) and Flower(jasmine, sybyl) -> Flower(sybyl, cristi)\nforall x (Scribe(x, jasmine) and Scribe(x, cristi) -> Deflate(jasmine, cristi))\nforall x (Scribe(x, cristi) -> Devalued(x))\nforall x (Flower(x, anatole) -> Flower(x, cristi))\n\nnot Unfurrowed(cristi)\n\nnot Unfurrowed(cristi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The ninetta derestrict the brigid. The ninetta derestrict the jammie. The ninetta is unhelpful. The ninetta welcome the jammie. The ninetta rebuke the neila. The ninetta rebuke the brigid. The neila is porticoed. The neila welcome the jammie. The brigid is unjust. The brigid is algal. The brigid is unhelpful. The brigid rebuke the neila. The jammie derestrict the ninetta. The jammie derestrict the brigid. The jammie welcome the brigid. If the ninetta rebuke the brigid then the brigid rebuke the jammie. If someone derestrict the ninetta and they are unhelpful then the ninetta is unjust. If someone welcome the jammie and they are algal then they chase the neila. If someone is porticoed then they see the brigid. If the jammie welcome the brigid and the brigid rebuke the jammie then the jammie rebuke the ninetta. If someone derestrict the brigid and they chase the ninetta then the brigid welcome the ninetta. If someone derestrict the ninetta then they are porticoed. If someone rebuke the neila then they visit the ninetta. The neila is green.", "logic": "\nDerestrict(ninetta, brigid)\nDerestrict(ninetta, jammie)\nUnhelpful(ninetta)\nWelcome(ninetta, jammie)\nRebuke(ninetta, neila)\nRebuke(ninetta, brigid)\nPorticoed(neila)\nWelcome(neila, jammie)\nUnjust(brigid)\nAlgal(brigid)\nUnhelpful(brigid)\nRebuke(brigid, neila)\nDerestrict(jammie, ninetta)\nDerestrict(jammie, brigid)\nWelcome(jammie, brigid)\nRebuke(ninetta, brigid) -> Rebuke(brigid, jammie)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, ninetta) and Unhelpful(x) -> Unjust(ninetta))\nforall x (Welcome(x, jammie) and Algal(x) -> Derestrict(x, neila))\nforall x (Porticoed(x) -> Welcome(x, brigid))\nWelcome(jammie, brigid) and Rebuke(brigid, jammie) -> Rebuke(jammie, ninetta)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, brigid) and Derestrict(x, ninetta) -> Welcome(brigid, ninetta))\nforall x (Derestrict(x, ninetta) -> Porticoed(x))\nforall x (Rebuke(x, neila) -> Rebuke(x, ninetta))\n\nGreen(neila)\n\nGreen(neila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Hephzibah is unshorn. Hephzibah is satisfying. Hephzibah is cytologic. Hephzibah is chambered. Mala is unshorn. Mala is satisfying. Mala is void. Mala is cytologic. Mala is after. Mala is chambered. White people are priapic. Rough, chambered people are after. All priapic, chambered people are satisfying. Hephzibah is unshorn.", "logic": "\nUnshorn(hephzibah)\nSatisfying(hephzibah)\nCytologic(hephzibah)\nChambered(hephzibah)\nUnshorn(mala)\nSatisfying(mala)\nVoid(mala)\nCytologic(mala)\nAfter(mala)\nChambered(mala)\nforall x (Chambered(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) and Chambered(x) -> After(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) and Chambered(x) -> Satisfying(x))\n\nUnshorn(hephzibah)\n\ntherefore Unshorn(hephzibah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Idette is tottering. Idette is evasive. Idette is tzarist. Idette is caespitose. Bella is tottering. Bella is evasive. Bella is steady. Bella is tzarist. Bella is unaddicted. Bella is caespitose. White people are hybrid. Rough, caespitose people are unaddicted. All hybrid, caespitose people are evasive. Bella is not tzarist.", "logic": "\nTottering(idette)\nEvasive(idette)\nTzarist(idette)\nCaespitose(idette)\nTottering(bella)\nEvasive(bella)\nSteady(bella)\nTzarist(bella)\nUnaddicted(bella)\nCaespitose(bella)\nforall x (Caespitose(x) -> Hybrid(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) and Caespitose(x) -> Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) and Caespitose(x) -> Evasive(x))\n\nnot Tzarist(bella)\n\ntherefore Tzarist(bella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Karylin is unbounded. Karylin is vinegary. Karylin is dismantled. Karylin is undrawn. Vlad is unbounded. Vlad is vinegary. Vlad is enured. Vlad is dismantled. Vlad is seminude. Vlad is undrawn. White people are unsanded. Rough, undrawn people are seminude. All unsanded, undrawn people are vinegary. Vlad is unsanded.", "logic": "\nUnbounded(karylin)\nVinegary(karylin)\nDismantled(karylin)\nUndrawn(karylin)\nUnbounded(vlad)\nVinegary(vlad)\nEnured(vlad)\nDismantled(vlad)\nSeminude(vlad)\nUndrawn(vlad)\nforall x (Undrawn(x) -> Unsanded(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) and Undrawn(x) -> Seminude(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) and Undrawn(x) -> Vinegary(x))\n\nUnsanded(vlad)\n\nUndrawn(vlad) and forall x (Undrawn(x) -> Unsanded(x)) -> therefore Unsanded(vlad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Donelle is micro. Donelle is condemning. Donelle is acrid. Donelle is aculeate. Margit is micro. Margit is condemning. Margit is rotted. Margit is acrid. Margit is snowy. Margit is aculeate. White people are desecrated. Rough, aculeate people are snowy. All desecrated, aculeate people are condemning. Donelle is not desecrated.", "logic": "\nMicro(donelle)\nCondemning(donelle)\nAcrid(donelle)\nAculeate(donelle)\nMicro(margit)\nCondemning(margit)\nRotted(margit)\nAcrid(margit)\nSnowy(margit)\nAculeate(margit)\nforall x (Aculeate(x) -> Desecrated(x))\nforall x (Desecrated(x) and Aculeate(x) -> Snowy(x))\nforall x (Desecrated(x) and Aculeate(x) -> Condemning(x))\n\nnot Desecrated(donelle)\n\nAculeate(donelle) and forall x (Aculeate(x) -> Desecrated(x)) -> therefore Desecrated(donelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Garry is ingrowing. Garry is tillable. Garry is nettlesome. Garry is esurient. Pandora is ingrowing. Pandora is tillable. Pandora is unhuman. Pandora is nettlesome. Pandora is pessimum. Pandora is esurient. White people are bleary. Rough, esurient people are pessimum. All bleary, esurient people are tillable. Garry is pessimum.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(garry)\nTillable(garry)\nNettlesome(garry)\nEsurient(garry)\nIngrowing(pandora)\nTillable(pandora)\nUnhuman(pandora)\nNettlesome(pandora)\nPessimum(pandora)\nEsurient(pandora)\nforall x (Esurient(x) -> Bleary(x))\nforall x (Bleary(x) and Esurient(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Bleary(x) and Esurient(x) -> Tillable(x))\n\nPessimum(garry)\n\nEsurient(garry) and forall x (Esurient(x) -> Bleary(x)) -> therefore Bleary(garry) Bleary(garry) and Esurient(garry) and forall x (Bleary(x) and Esurient(x) -> Pessimum(x)) -> therefore Pessimum(garry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Auroora is crotchety. Auroora is tangled. Auroora is downscale. Auroora is postnatal. Jake is crotchety. Jake is tangled. Jake is unbolted. Jake is downscale. Jake is twisty. Jake is postnatal. White people are doltish. Rough, postnatal people are twisty. All doltish, postnatal people are tangled. Auroora is not twisty.", "logic": "\nCrotchety(auroora)\nTangled(auroora)\nDownscale(auroora)\nPostnatal(auroora)\nCrotchety(jake)\nTangled(jake)\nUnbolted(jake)\nDownscale(jake)\nTwisty(jake)\nPostnatal(jake)\nforall x (Postnatal(x) -> Doltish(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Twisty(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Tangled(x))\n\nnot Twisty(auroora)\n\nPostnatal(auroora) and forall x (Postnatal(x) -> Doltish(x)) -> therefore Doltish(auroora) Doltish(auroora) and Postnatal(auroora) and forall x (Doltish(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Twisty(x)) -> therefore Twisty(auroora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Garnet is delayed. Koralle is tomentose. Genovera is not basilar. Eugenia is basilar. All basilar people are tomentose. If someone is tomentose then they are jangling. Koralle is tomentose.", "logic": "\nDelayed(garnet)\nTomentose(koralle)\nnot Basilar(genovera)\nBasilar(eugenia)\nforall x (Basilar(x) -> Tomentose(x))\nforall x (Tomentose(x) -> Jangling(x))\n\nTomentose(koralle)\n\ntherefore Tomentose(koralle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Kassia is uncounted. Emmi is isomorphic. Krista is not interwoven. Celestyna is interwoven. All interwoven people are isomorphic. If someone is isomorphic then they are bald. Krista is interwoven.", "logic": "\nUncounted(kassia)\nIsomorphic(emmi)\nnot Interwoven(krista)\nInterwoven(celestyna)\nforall x (Interwoven(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Bald(x))\n\nInterwoven(krista)\n\ntherefore not Interwoven(krista)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Louisa is sweetened. Niles is anabiotic. West is not unkindled. Jori is unkindled. All unkindled people are anabiotic. If someone is anabiotic then they are geodetic. Jori is anabiotic.", "logic": "\nSweetened(louisa)\nAnabiotic(niles)\nnot Unkindled(west)\nUnkindled(jori)\nforall x (Unkindled(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) -> Geodetic(x))\n\nAnabiotic(jori)\n\nUnkindled(jori) and forall x (Unkindled(x) -> Anabiotic(x)) -> therefore Anabiotic(jori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Berget is epileptic. Ivette is sculpted. Mattie is not ageing. Corabelle is ageing. All ageing people are sculpted. If someone is sculpted then they are skimpy. Corabelle is not sculpted.", "logic": "\nEpileptic(berget)\nSculpted(ivette)\nnot Ageing(mattie)\nAgeing(corabelle)\nforall x (Ageing(x) -> Sculpted(x))\nforall x (Sculpted(x) -> Skimpy(x))\n\nnot Sculpted(corabelle)\n\nAgeing(corabelle) and forall x (Ageing(x) -> Sculpted(x)) -> therefore Sculpted(corabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Lyssa is opponent. Verney is numbing. Carina is not throaty. Emelda is throaty. All throaty people are numbing. If someone is numbing then they are laggard. Emelda is laggard.", "logic": "\nOpponent(lyssa)\nNumbing(verney)\nnot Throaty(carina)\nThroaty(emelda)\nforall x (Throaty(x) -> Numbing(x))\nforall x (Numbing(x) -> Laggard(x))\n\nLaggard(emelda)\n\nThroaty(emelda) and forall x (Throaty(x) -> Numbing(x)) -> therefore Numbing(emelda) Numbing(emelda) and forall x (Numbing(x) -> Laggard(x)) -> therefore Laggard(emelda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Catarina is chaldee. Nerissa is luminous. Nichols is not weedless. Josh is weedless. All weedless people are luminous. If someone is luminous then they are extropic. Josh is not extropic.", "logic": "\nChaldee(catarina)\nLuminous(nerissa)\nnot Weedless(nichols)\nWeedless(josh)\nforall x (Weedless(x) -> Luminous(x))\nforall x (Luminous(x) -> Extropic(x))\n\nnot Extropic(josh)\n\nWeedless(josh) and forall x (Weedless(x) -> Luminous(x)) -> therefore Luminous(josh) Luminous(josh) and forall x (Luminous(x) -> Extropic(x)) -> therefore Extropic(josh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Xever is whatsoever. Cloris is elfin. Oren is not diffuse. Chloe is diffuse. All diffuse people are elfin. If someone is elfin then they are eyed. Oren is not elfin.", "logic": "\nWhatsoever(xever)\nElfin(cloris)\nnot Diffuse(oren)\nDiffuse(chloe)\nforall x (Diffuse(x) -> Elfin(x))\nforall x (Elfin(x) -> Eyed(x))\n\nnot Elfin(oren)\n\nforall x (Diffuse(x) -> Elfin(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Kore is toothsome. Edmund is acold. Neddie is not heartening. Grissel is heartening. All heartening people are acold. If someone is acold then they are laborious. Neddie is laborious.", "logic": "\nToothsome(kore)\nAcold(edmund)\nnot Heartening(neddie)\nHeartening(grissel)\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> Acold(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) -> Laborious(x))\n\nLaborious(neddie)\n\nforall x (Acold(x) -> Laborious(x)) <- forall x (Heartening(x) -> Acold(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Binny is quiescent. Virge is inorganic. Othilia is not bipinnate. Zita is bipinnate. All bipinnate people are inorganic. If someone is inorganic then they are moonlit. Binny is not inorganic.", "logic": "\nQuiescent(binny)\nInorganic(virge)\nnot Bipinnate(othilia)\nBipinnate(zita)\nforall x (Bipinnate(x) -> Inorganic(x))\nforall x (Inorganic(x) -> Moonlit(x))\n\nnot Inorganic(binny)\n\nforall x (Bipinnate(x) -> Inorganic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Norri is vincible. Violette is alkylic. Horacio is not sturdy. Reba is sturdy. All sturdy people are alkylic. If someone is alkylic then they are towering. Reba is vincible.", "logic": "\nVincible(norri)\nAlkylic(violette)\nnot Sturdy(horacio)\nSturdy(reba)\nforall x (Sturdy(x) -> Alkylic(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Towering(x))\n\nVincible(reba)\n\nVincible(reba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Alister is deniable. Minetta is activist. Netta is not fahrenheit. Jacob is fahrenheit. All fahrenheit people are activist. If someone is activist then they are cyanophyte. Jacob is not furry.", "logic": "\nDeniable(alister)\nActivist(minetta)\nnot Fahrenheit(netta)\nFahrenheit(jacob)\nforall x (Fahrenheit(x) -> Activist(x))\nforall x (Activist(x) -> Cyanophyte(x))\n\nnot Furry(jacob)\n\nnot Furry(jacob) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Mariya is wilted. Gunvor is obliging. Tannie is not obstructed. Antonella is obstructed. All obstructed people are obliging. If someone is obliging then they are spheroidal. Mariya is furry.", "logic": "\nWilted(mariya)\nObliging(gunvor)\nnot Obstructed(tannie)\nObstructed(antonella)\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Obliging(x))\nforall x (Obliging(x) -> Spheroidal(x))\n\nFurry(mariya)\n\nFurry(mariya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1254"} {"premises": "Elfrida is flip. White things are unswerving. If something is bromidic then it is unswerving. All unswerving things are unhurried. Elfrida is flip.", "logic": "\nFlip(elfrida)\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Bromidic(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) -> Unhurried(x))\n\nFlip(elfrida)\n\ntherefore Flip(elfrida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Marcos is affecting. White things are adaptive. If something is peachy then it is adaptive. All adaptive things are equine. Marcos is not affecting.", "logic": "\nAffecting(marcos)\nforall x (Affecting(x) -> Adaptive(x))\nforall x (Peachy(x) -> Adaptive(x))\nforall x (Adaptive(x) -> Equine(x))\n\nnot Affecting(marcos)\n\ntherefore Affecting(marcos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Malva is peeved. White things are textual. If something is energising then it is textual. All textual things are signed. Malva is textual.", "logic": "\nPeeved(malva)\nforall x (Peeved(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Signed(x))\n\nTextual(malva)\n\nPeeved(malva) and forall x (Peeved(x) -> Textual(x)) -> therefore Textual(malva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Staffard is partial. White things are cuplike. If something is barbarous then it is cuplike. All cuplike things are lxxiv. Staffard is not cuplike.", "logic": "\nPartial(staffard)\nforall x (Partial(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nforall x (Barbarous(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nforall x (Cuplike(x) -> Lxxiv(x))\n\nnot Cuplike(staffard)\n\nPartial(staffard) and forall x (Partial(x) -> Cuplike(x)) -> therefore Cuplike(staffard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Tabina is coastal. White things are toiling. If something is chanceful then it is toiling. All toiling things are foregoing. Tabina is foregoing.", "logic": "\nCoastal(tabina)\nforall x (Coastal(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Chanceful(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) -> Foregoing(x))\n\nForegoing(tabina)\n\nCoastal(tabina) and forall x (Coastal(x) -> Toiling(x)) -> therefore Toiling(tabina) Toiling(tabina) and forall x (Toiling(x) -> Foregoing(x)) -> therefore Foregoing(tabina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Rahel is bearable. White things are labial. If something is cordial then it is labial. All labial things are powdery. Rahel is not powdery.", "logic": "\nBearable(rahel)\nforall x (Bearable(x) -> Labial(x))\nforall x (Cordial(x) -> Labial(x))\nforall x (Labial(x) -> Powdery(x))\n\nnot Powdery(rahel)\n\nBearable(rahel) and forall x (Bearable(x) -> Labial(x)) -> therefore Labial(rahel) Labial(rahel) and forall x (Labial(x) -> Powdery(x)) -> therefore Powdery(rahel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Osbert is flavorous. White things are surprising. If something is stabilized then it is surprising. All surprising things are recovering. Osbert is not red.", "logic": "\nFlavorous(osbert)\nforall x (Flavorous(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Stabilized(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Surprising(x) -> Recovering(x))\n\nnot Red(osbert)\n\nnot Red(osbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Cloe is debased. White things are passant. If something is radiating then it is passant. All passant things are ischemic. Cloe is big.", "logic": "\nDebased(cloe)\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Passant(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) -> Passant(x))\nforall x (Passant(x) -> Ischemic(x))\n\nBig(cloe)\n\nBig(cloe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Carey is aetiologic. White things are oppressive. If something is ultra then it is oppressive. All oppressive things are corporal. Carey is not ultra.", "logic": "\nAetiologic(carey)\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Oppressive(x))\nforall x (Ultra(x) -> Oppressive(x))\nforall x (Oppressive(x) -> Corporal(x))\n\nnot Ultra(carey)\n\nnot Ultra(carey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "Scot is tolerable. White things are wrothful. If something is batholitic then it is wrothful. All wrothful things are phobic. Scot is round.", "logic": "\nTolerable(scot)\nforall x (Tolerable(x) -> Wrothful(x))\nforall x (Batholitic(x) -> Wrothful(x))\nforall x (Wrothful(x) -> Phobic(x))\n\nRound(scot)\n\nRound(scot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-924"} {"premises": "The jacquie is loosened. The jacquie smutch the henry. The henry is overhasty. The henry is singhalese. The henry is loosened. The henry is not scaled. The henry is algonquin. The henry does not like the jacquie. The henry does not need the jacquie. The henry smutch the jacquie. If someone smutch the henry then they need the jacquie. If someone is scaled and they need the jacquie then the jacquie does not need the henry. If someone refine the henry and the henry does not like the jacquie then the jacquie retard the henry. If someone refine the henry then they need the henry. If someone smutch the jacquie then the jacquie refine the henry. If someone retard the jacquie and the jacquie is not algonquin then they are singhalese. The henry is loosened.", "logic": "\nLoosened(jacquie)\nSmutch(jacquie, henry)\nOverhasty(henry)\nSinghalese(henry)\nLoosened(henry)\nnot Scaled(henry)\nAlgonquin(henry)\nnot Refine(henry, jacquie)\nnot Retard(henry, jacquie)\nSmutch(henry, jacquie)\nforall x (Smutch(x, henry) -> Retard(x, jacquie))\nforall x (Scaled(x) and Retard(x, jacquie) -> not Retard(jacquie, henry))\nforall x (Refine(x, henry) and not Refine(henry, jacquie) -> Retard(jacquie, henry))\nforall x (Refine(x, henry) -> Retard(x, henry))\nforall x (Smutch(x, jacquie) -> Refine(jacquie, henry))\nforall x (Retard(x, jacquie) and not Algonquin(jacquie) -> Singhalese(x))\n\nLoosened(henry)\n\ntherefore Loosened(henry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The earle is alienable. The earle heliograph the willow. The willow is amoebous. The willow is arced. The willow is alienable. The willow is not informal. The willow is homostyled. The willow does not like the earle. The willow does not need the earle. The willow heliograph the earle. If someone heliograph the willow then they need the earle. If someone is informal and they need the earle then the earle does not need the willow. If someone writhe the willow and the willow does not like the earle then the earle copyright the willow. If someone writhe the willow then they need the willow. If someone heliograph the earle then the earle writhe the willow. If someone copyright the earle and the earle is not homostyled then they are arced. The willow copyright the earle.", "logic": "\nAlienable(earle)\nHeliograph(earle, willow)\nAmoebous(willow)\nArced(willow)\nAlienable(willow)\nnot Informal(willow)\nHomostyled(willow)\nnot Writhe(willow, earle)\nnot Copyright(willow, earle)\nHeliograph(willow, earle)\nforall x (Heliograph(x, willow) -> Copyright(x, earle))\nforall x (Informal(x) and Copyright(x, earle) -> not Copyright(earle, willow))\nforall x (Writhe(x, willow) and not Writhe(willow, earle) -> Copyright(earle, willow))\nforall x (Writhe(x, willow) -> Copyright(x, willow))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, earle) -> Writhe(earle, willow))\nforall x (Copyright(x, earle) and not Homostyled(earle) -> Arced(x))\n\nCopyright(willow, earle)\n\ntherefore not Copyright(willow, earle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The waleed is yelled. The waleed snowboard the evelyn. The evelyn is rental. The evelyn is wrought. The evelyn is yelled. The evelyn is not staple. The evelyn is sevenfold. The evelyn does not like the waleed. The evelyn does not need the waleed. The evelyn snowboard the waleed. If someone snowboard the evelyn then they need the waleed. If someone is staple and they need the waleed then the waleed does not need the evelyn. If someone rive the evelyn and the evelyn does not like the waleed then the waleed blemish the evelyn. If someone rive the evelyn then they need the evelyn. If someone snowboard the waleed then the waleed rive the evelyn. If someone blemish the waleed and the waleed is not sevenfold then they are wrought. The waleed blemish the waleed.", "logic": "\nYelled(waleed)\nSnowboard(waleed, evelyn)\nRental(evelyn)\nWrought(evelyn)\nYelled(evelyn)\nnot Staple(evelyn)\nSevenfold(evelyn)\nnot Rive(evelyn, waleed)\nnot Blemish(evelyn, waleed)\nSnowboard(evelyn, waleed)\nforall x (Snowboard(x, evelyn) -> Blemish(x, waleed))\nforall x (Staple(x) and Blemish(x, waleed) -> not Blemish(waleed, evelyn))\nforall x (Rive(x, evelyn) and not Rive(evelyn, waleed) -> Blemish(waleed, evelyn))\nforall x (Rive(x, evelyn) -> Blemish(x, evelyn))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, waleed) -> Rive(waleed, evelyn))\nforall x (Blemish(x, waleed) and not Sevenfold(waleed) -> Wrought(x))\n\nBlemish(waleed, waleed)\n\nSnowboard(waleed, evelyn) and forall x (Snowboard(x, evelyn) -> Blemish(x, waleed)) -> therefore Blemish(waleed, waleed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The gerri is tinkly. The gerri roar the marilu. The marilu is back. The marilu is unliterary. The marilu is tinkly. The marilu is not umteenth. The marilu is transpolar. The marilu does not like the gerri. The marilu does not need the gerri. The marilu roar the gerri. If someone roar the marilu then they need the gerri. If someone is umteenth and they need the gerri then the gerri does not need the marilu. If someone decrease the marilu and the marilu does not like the gerri then the gerri thwack the marilu. If someone decrease the marilu then they need the marilu. If someone roar the gerri then the gerri decrease the marilu. If someone thwack the gerri and the gerri is not transpolar then they are unliterary. The gerri does not need the gerri.", "logic": "\nTinkly(gerri)\nRoar(gerri, marilu)\nBack(marilu)\nUnliterary(marilu)\nTinkly(marilu)\nnot Umteenth(marilu)\nTranspolar(marilu)\nnot Decrease(marilu, gerri)\nnot Thwack(marilu, gerri)\nRoar(marilu, gerri)\nforall x (Roar(x, marilu) -> Thwack(x, gerri))\nforall x (Umteenth(x) and Thwack(x, gerri) -> not Thwack(gerri, marilu))\nforall x (Decrease(x, marilu) and not Decrease(marilu, gerri) -> Thwack(gerri, marilu))\nforall x (Decrease(x, marilu) -> Thwack(x, marilu))\nforall x (Roar(x, gerri) -> Decrease(gerri, marilu))\nforall x (Thwack(x, gerri) and not Transpolar(gerri) -> Unliterary(x))\n\nnot Thwack(gerri, gerri)\n\nRoar(gerri, marilu) and forall x (Roar(x, marilu) -> Thwack(x, gerri)) -> therefore Thwack(gerri, gerri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The bela is negro. The bela navigate the brandice. The brandice is gross. The brandice is prefatory. The brandice is negro. The brandice is not calced. The brandice is prodromal. The brandice does not like the bela. The brandice does not need the bela. The brandice navigate the bela. If someone navigate the brandice then they need the bela. If someone is calced and they need the bela then the bela does not need the brandice. If someone bunco the brandice and the brandice does not like the bela then the bela repatriate the brandice. If someone bunco the brandice then they need the brandice. If someone navigate the bela then the bela bunco the brandice. If someone repatriate the bela and the bela is not prodromal then they are prefatory. The bela repatriate the brandice.", "logic": "\nNegro(bela)\nNavigate(bela, brandice)\nGross(brandice)\nPrefatory(brandice)\nNegro(brandice)\nnot Calced(brandice)\nProdromal(brandice)\nnot Bunco(brandice, bela)\nnot Repatriate(brandice, bela)\nNavigate(brandice, bela)\nforall x (Navigate(x, brandice) -> Repatriate(x, bela))\nforall x (Calced(x) and Repatriate(x, bela) -> not Repatriate(bela, brandice))\nforall x (Bunco(x, brandice) and not Bunco(brandice, bela) -> Repatriate(bela, brandice))\nforall x (Bunco(x, brandice) -> Repatriate(x, brandice))\nforall x (Navigate(x, bela) -> Bunco(bela, brandice))\nforall x (Repatriate(x, bela) and not Prodromal(bela) -> Prefatory(x))\n\nRepatriate(bela, brandice)\n\nNavigate(brandice, bela) and forall x (Navigate(x, bela) -> Bunco(bela, brandice)) -> therefore Bunco(bela, brandice) Bunco(bela, brandice) and forall x (Bunco(x, brandice) -> Repatriate(x, brandice)) -> therefore Repatriate(bela, brandice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The magna is fractious. The magna prejudice the ingelbert. The ingelbert is unimodal. The ingelbert is rose. The ingelbert is fractious. The ingelbert is not thoriated. The ingelbert is tottering. The ingelbert does not like the magna. The ingelbert does not need the magna. The ingelbert prejudice the magna. If someone prejudice the ingelbert then they need the magna. If someone is thoriated and they need the magna then the magna does not need the ingelbert. If someone unclothe the ingelbert and the ingelbert does not like the magna then the magna evict the ingelbert. If someone unclothe the ingelbert then they need the ingelbert. If someone prejudice the magna then the magna unclothe the ingelbert. If someone evict the magna and the magna is not tottering then they are rose. The magna does not need the ingelbert.", "logic": "\nFractious(magna)\nPrejudice(magna, ingelbert)\nUnimodal(ingelbert)\nRose(ingelbert)\nFractious(ingelbert)\nnot Thoriated(ingelbert)\nTottering(ingelbert)\nnot Unclothe(ingelbert, magna)\nnot Evict(ingelbert, magna)\nPrejudice(ingelbert, magna)\nforall x (Prejudice(x, ingelbert) -> Evict(x, magna))\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Evict(x, magna) -> not Evict(magna, ingelbert))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, ingelbert) and not Unclothe(ingelbert, magna) -> Evict(magna, ingelbert))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, ingelbert) -> Evict(x, ingelbert))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, magna) -> Unclothe(magna, ingelbert))\nforall x (Evict(x, magna) and not Tottering(magna) -> Rose(x))\n\nnot Evict(magna, ingelbert)\n\nPrejudice(ingelbert, magna) and forall x (Prejudice(x, magna) -> Unclothe(magna, ingelbert)) -> therefore Unclothe(magna, ingelbert) Unclothe(magna, ingelbert) and forall x (Unclothe(x, ingelbert) -> Evict(x, ingelbert)) -> therefore Evict(magna, ingelbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The marlene is willowy. The marlene summons the leonidas. The leonidas is botuliform. The leonidas is extrinsic. The leonidas is willowy. The leonidas is not appointive. The leonidas is elemental. The leonidas does not like the marlene. The leonidas does not need the marlene. The leonidas summons the marlene. If someone summons the leonidas then they need the marlene. If someone is appointive and they need the marlene then the marlene does not need the leonidas. If someone overfly the leonidas and the leonidas does not like the marlene then the marlene flatten the leonidas. If someone overfly the leonidas then they need the leonidas. If someone summons the marlene then the marlene overfly the leonidas. If someone flatten the marlene and the marlene is not elemental then they are extrinsic. The marlene is not extrinsic.", "logic": "\nWillowy(marlene)\nSummons(marlene, leonidas)\nBotuliform(leonidas)\nExtrinsic(leonidas)\nWillowy(leonidas)\nnot Appointive(leonidas)\nElemental(leonidas)\nnot Overfly(leonidas, marlene)\nnot Flatten(leonidas, marlene)\nSummons(leonidas, marlene)\nforall x (Summons(x, leonidas) -> Flatten(x, marlene))\nforall x (Appointive(x) and Flatten(x, marlene) -> not Flatten(marlene, leonidas))\nforall x (Overfly(x, leonidas) and not Overfly(leonidas, marlene) -> Flatten(marlene, leonidas))\nforall x (Overfly(x, leonidas) -> Flatten(x, leonidas))\nforall x (Summons(x, marlene) -> Overfly(marlene, leonidas))\nforall x (Flatten(x, marlene) and not Elemental(marlene) -> Extrinsic(x))\n\nnot Extrinsic(marlene)\n\nforall x (Flatten(x, marlene) and not Elemental(marlene) -> Extrinsic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The dionne is venerating. The dionne rent the pyotr. The pyotr is semiannual. The pyotr is traveled. The pyotr is venerating. The pyotr is not duteous. The pyotr is clenched. The pyotr does not like the dionne. The pyotr does not need the dionne. The pyotr rent the dionne. If someone rent the pyotr then they need the dionne. If someone is duteous and they need the dionne then the dionne does not need the pyotr. If someone perforate the pyotr and the pyotr does not like the dionne then the dionne quote the pyotr. If someone perforate the pyotr then they need the pyotr. If someone rent the dionne then the dionne perforate the pyotr. If someone quote the dionne and the dionne is not clenched then they are traveled. The pyotr quote the pyotr.", "logic": "\nVenerating(dionne)\nRent(dionne, pyotr)\nSemiannual(pyotr)\nTraveled(pyotr)\nVenerating(pyotr)\nnot Duteous(pyotr)\nClenched(pyotr)\nnot Perforate(pyotr, dionne)\nnot Quote(pyotr, dionne)\nRent(pyotr, dionne)\nforall x (Rent(x, pyotr) -> Quote(x, dionne))\nforall x (Duteous(x) and Quote(x, dionne) -> not Quote(dionne, pyotr))\nforall x (Perforate(x, pyotr) and not Perforate(pyotr, dionne) -> Quote(dionne, pyotr))\nforall x (Perforate(x, pyotr) -> Quote(x, pyotr))\nforall x (Rent(x, dionne) -> Perforate(dionne, pyotr))\nforall x (Quote(x, dionne) and not Clenched(dionne) -> Traveled(x))\n\nQuote(pyotr, pyotr)\n\nforall x (Perforate(x, pyotr) -> Quote(x, pyotr)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The herman is dyspnoeal. The herman quote the kurt. The kurt is speckless. The kurt is deadpan. The kurt is dyspnoeal. The kurt is not biramous. The kurt is tzarist. The kurt does not like the herman. The kurt does not need the herman. The kurt quote the herman. If someone quote the kurt then they need the herman. If someone is biramous and they need the herman then the herman does not need the kurt. If someone medicate the kurt and the kurt does not like the herman then the herman ooze the kurt. If someone medicate the kurt then they need the kurt. If someone quote the herman then the herman medicate the kurt. If someone ooze the herman and the herman is not tzarist then they are deadpan. The herman does not like the herman.", "logic": "\nDyspnoeal(herman)\nQuote(herman, kurt)\nSpeckless(kurt)\nDeadpan(kurt)\nDyspnoeal(kurt)\nnot Biramous(kurt)\nTzarist(kurt)\nnot Medicate(kurt, herman)\nnot Ooze(kurt, herman)\nQuote(kurt, herman)\nforall x (Quote(x, kurt) -> Ooze(x, herman))\nforall x (Biramous(x) and Ooze(x, herman) -> not Ooze(herman, kurt))\nforall x (Medicate(x, kurt) and not Medicate(kurt, herman) -> Ooze(herman, kurt))\nforall x (Medicate(x, kurt) -> Ooze(x, kurt))\nforall x (Quote(x, herman) -> Medicate(herman, kurt))\nforall x (Ooze(x, herman) and not Tzarist(herman) -> Deadpan(x))\n\nnot Medicate(herman, herman)\n\nnot Medicate(herman, herman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The waleed is gasified. The waleed liquidate the francine. The francine is consoling. The francine is repeatable. The francine is gasified. The francine is not asteriated. The francine is wrothful. The francine does not like the waleed. The francine does not need the waleed. The francine liquidate the waleed. If someone liquidate the francine then they need the waleed. If someone is asteriated and they need the waleed then the waleed does not need the francine. If someone prove the francine and the francine does not like the waleed then the waleed iodinate the francine. If someone prove the francine then they need the francine. If someone liquidate the waleed then the waleed prove the francine. If someone iodinate the waleed and the waleed is not wrothful then they are repeatable. The waleed is consoling.", "logic": "\nGasified(waleed)\nLiquidate(waleed, francine)\nConsoling(francine)\nRepeatable(francine)\nGasified(francine)\nnot Asteriated(francine)\nWrothful(francine)\nnot Prove(francine, waleed)\nnot Iodinate(francine, waleed)\nLiquidate(francine, waleed)\nforall x (Liquidate(x, francine) -> Iodinate(x, waleed))\nforall x (Asteriated(x) and Iodinate(x, waleed) -> not Iodinate(waleed, francine))\nforall x (Prove(x, francine) and not Prove(francine, waleed) -> Iodinate(waleed, francine))\nforall x (Prove(x, francine) -> Iodinate(x, francine))\nforall x (Liquidate(x, waleed) -> Prove(waleed, francine))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, waleed) and not Wrothful(waleed) -> Repeatable(x))\n\nConsoling(waleed)\n\nConsoling(waleed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The donnajean is belemnitic. The donnajean absorb the audrie. The audrie is ascosporic. The audrie is bronzy. The audrie is belemnitic. The audrie is not calicular. The audrie is ambrosial. The audrie does not like the donnajean. The audrie does not need the donnajean. The audrie absorb the donnajean. If someone absorb the audrie then they need the donnajean. If someone is calicular and they need the donnajean then the donnajean does not need the audrie. If someone mildew the audrie and the audrie does not like the donnajean then the donnajean index the audrie. If someone mildew the audrie then they need the audrie. If someone absorb the donnajean then the donnajean mildew the audrie. If someone index the donnajean and the donnajean is not ambrosial then they are bronzy. The donnajean does not visit the donnajean.", "logic": "\nBelemnitic(donnajean)\nAbsorb(donnajean, audrie)\nAscosporic(audrie)\nBronzy(audrie)\nBelemnitic(audrie)\nnot Calicular(audrie)\nAmbrosial(audrie)\nnot Mildew(audrie, donnajean)\nnot Index(audrie, donnajean)\nAbsorb(audrie, donnajean)\nforall x (Absorb(x, audrie) -> Index(x, donnajean))\nforall x (Calicular(x) and Index(x, donnajean) -> not Index(donnajean, audrie))\nforall x (Mildew(x, audrie) and not Mildew(audrie, donnajean) -> Index(donnajean, audrie))\nforall x (Mildew(x, audrie) -> Index(x, audrie))\nforall x (Absorb(x, donnajean) -> Mildew(donnajean, audrie))\nforall x (Index(x, donnajean) and not Ambrosial(donnajean) -> Bronzy(x))\n\nnot Absorb(donnajean, donnajean)\n\nnot Absorb(donnajean, donnajean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The ikey is divalent. The ikey vitalise the ottilie. The ottilie is unrhythmic. The ottilie is sellable. The ottilie is divalent. The ottilie is not slippy. The ottilie is stygian. The ottilie does not like the ikey. The ottilie does not need the ikey. The ottilie vitalise the ikey. If someone vitalise the ottilie then they need the ikey. If someone is slippy and they need the ikey then the ikey does not need the ottilie. If someone swelter the ottilie and the ottilie does not like the ikey then the ikey cave the ottilie. If someone swelter the ottilie then they need the ottilie. If someone vitalise the ikey then the ikey swelter the ottilie. If someone cave the ikey and the ikey is not stygian then they are sellable. The ottilie swelter the ottilie.", "logic": "\nDivalent(ikey)\nVitalise(ikey, ottilie)\nUnrhythmic(ottilie)\nSellable(ottilie)\nDivalent(ottilie)\nnot Slippy(ottilie)\nStygian(ottilie)\nnot Swelter(ottilie, ikey)\nnot Cave(ottilie, ikey)\nVitalise(ottilie, ikey)\nforall x (Vitalise(x, ottilie) -> Cave(x, ikey))\nforall x (Slippy(x) and Cave(x, ikey) -> not Cave(ikey, ottilie))\nforall x (Swelter(x, ottilie) and not Swelter(ottilie, ikey) -> Cave(ikey, ottilie))\nforall x (Swelter(x, ottilie) -> Cave(x, ottilie))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, ikey) -> Swelter(ikey, ottilie))\nforall x (Cave(x, ikey) and not Stygian(ikey) -> Sellable(x))\n\nSwelter(ottilie, ottilie)\n\nSwelter(ottilie, ottilie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1586"} {"premises": "The inez catalyze the anatollo. The inez is techy. The inez does not see the anatollo. The inez ball the anatollo. The ambur catalyze the anatollo. The ambur inject the inez. The ambur inject the anatollo. The ambur ball the anatollo. The anatollo catalyze the ambur. The anatollo is xxxviii. The anatollo is not footsure. The anatollo does not see the ambur. If something ball the inez and it inject the inez then the inez ball the ambur. If something is deserted and it inject the inez then the inez does not see the anatollo. If something catalyze the anatollo then it ball the inez. The ambur catalyze the anatollo.", "logic": "\nCatalyze(inez, anatollo)\nTechy(inez)\nnot Inject(inez, anatollo)\nBall(inez, anatollo)\nCatalyze(ambur, anatollo)\nInject(ambur, inez)\nInject(ambur, anatollo)\nBall(ambur, anatollo)\nCatalyze(anatollo, ambur)\nXxxviii(anatollo)\nnot Footsure(anatollo)\nnot Inject(anatollo, ambur)\nforall x (Ball(x, inez) and Inject(x, inez) -> Ball(inez, ambur))\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Inject(x, inez) -> not Inject(inez, anatollo))\nforall x (Catalyze(x, anatollo) -> Ball(x, inez))\n\nCatalyze(ambur, anatollo)\n\ntherefore Catalyze(ambur, anatollo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The corri skip the town. The corri is suspensive. The corri does not see the town. The corri amount the town. The brena skip the town. The brena meddle the corri. The brena meddle the town. The brena amount the town. The town skip the brena. The town is bracteal. The town is not nodular. The town does not see the brena. If something amount the corri and it meddle the corri then the corri amount the brena. If something is groveling and it meddle the corri then the corri does not see the town. If something skip the town then it amount the corri. The corri meddle the town.", "logic": "\nSkip(corri, town)\nSuspensive(corri)\nnot Meddle(corri, town)\nAmount(corri, town)\nSkip(brena, town)\nMeddle(brena, corri)\nMeddle(brena, town)\nAmount(brena, town)\nSkip(town, brena)\nBracteal(town)\nnot Nodular(town)\nnot Meddle(town, brena)\nforall x (Amount(x, corri) and Meddle(x, corri) -> Amount(corri, brena))\nforall x (Groveling(x) and Meddle(x, corri) -> not Meddle(corri, town))\nforall x (Skip(x, town) -> Amount(x, corri))\n\nMeddle(corri, town)\n\ntherefore not Meddle(corri, town)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The melosa swaddle the sephira. The melosa is aquiline. The melosa does not see the sephira. The melosa haul the sephira. The teodorico swaddle the sephira. The teodorico career the melosa. The teodorico career the sephira. The teodorico haul the sephira. The sephira swaddle the teodorico. The sephira is overheated. The sephira is not repentant. The sephira does not see the teodorico. If something haul the melosa and it career the melosa then the melosa haul the teodorico. If something is steadfast and it career the melosa then the melosa does not see the sephira. If something swaddle the sephira then it haul the melosa. The teodorico haul the melosa.", "logic": "\nSwaddle(melosa, sephira)\nAquiline(melosa)\nnot Career(melosa, sephira)\nHaul(melosa, sephira)\nSwaddle(teodorico, sephira)\nCareer(teodorico, melosa)\nCareer(teodorico, sephira)\nHaul(teodorico, sephira)\nSwaddle(sephira, teodorico)\nOverheated(sephira)\nnot Repentant(sephira)\nnot Career(sephira, teodorico)\nforall x (Haul(x, melosa) and Career(x, melosa) -> Haul(melosa, teodorico))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) and Career(x, melosa) -> not Career(melosa, sephira))\nforall x (Swaddle(x, sephira) -> Haul(x, melosa))\n\nHaul(teodorico, melosa)\n\nSwaddle(teodorico, sephira) and forall x (Swaddle(x, sephira) -> Haul(x, melosa)) -> therefore Haul(teodorico, melosa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The simone canonize the dennie. The simone is conscious. The simone does not see the dennie. The simone deflagrate the dennie. The gertrudis canonize the dennie. The gertrudis magnetize the simone. The gertrudis magnetize the dennie. The gertrudis deflagrate the dennie. The dennie canonize the gertrudis. The dennie is siouan. The dennie is not galvanic. The dennie does not see the gertrudis. If something deflagrate the simone and it magnetize the simone then the simone deflagrate the gertrudis. If something is wound and it magnetize the simone then the simone does not see the dennie. If something canonize the dennie then it deflagrate the simone. The gertrudis does not visit the simone.", "logic": "\nCanonize(simone, dennie)\nConscious(simone)\nnot Magnetize(simone, dennie)\nDeflagrate(simone, dennie)\nCanonize(gertrudis, dennie)\nMagnetize(gertrudis, simone)\nMagnetize(gertrudis, dennie)\nDeflagrate(gertrudis, dennie)\nCanonize(dennie, gertrudis)\nSiouan(dennie)\nnot Galvanic(dennie)\nnot Magnetize(dennie, gertrudis)\nforall x (Deflagrate(x, simone) and Magnetize(x, simone) -> Deflagrate(simone, gertrudis))\nforall x (Wound(x) and Magnetize(x, simone) -> not Magnetize(simone, dennie))\nforall x (Canonize(x, dennie) -> Deflagrate(x, simone))\n\nnot Deflagrate(gertrudis, simone)\n\nCanonize(gertrudis, dennie) and forall x (Canonize(x, dennie) -> Deflagrate(x, simone)) -> therefore Deflagrate(gertrudis, simone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The alvera output the kamila. The alvera is wrenching. The alvera does not see the kamila. The alvera oxidise the kamila. The tuesday output the kamila. The tuesday misguide the alvera. The tuesday misguide the kamila. The tuesday oxidise the kamila. The kamila output the tuesday. The kamila is armed. The kamila is not decreed. The kamila does not see the tuesday. If something oxidise the alvera and it misguide the alvera then the alvera oxidise the tuesday. If something is combative and it misguide the alvera then the alvera does not see the kamila. If something output the kamila then it oxidise the alvera. The alvera oxidise the tuesday.", "logic": "\nOutput(alvera, kamila)\nWrenching(alvera)\nnot Misguide(alvera, kamila)\nOxidise(alvera, kamila)\nOutput(tuesday, kamila)\nMisguide(tuesday, alvera)\nMisguide(tuesday, kamila)\nOxidise(tuesday, kamila)\nOutput(kamila, tuesday)\nArmed(kamila)\nnot Decreed(kamila)\nnot Misguide(kamila, tuesday)\nforall x (Oxidise(x, alvera) and Misguide(x, alvera) -> Oxidise(alvera, tuesday))\nforall x (Combative(x) and Misguide(x, alvera) -> not Misguide(alvera, kamila))\nforall x (Output(x, kamila) -> Oxidise(x, alvera))\n\nOxidise(alvera, tuesday)\n\nOutput(tuesday, kamila) and forall x (Output(x, kamila) -> Oxidise(x, alvera)) -> therefore Oxidise(tuesday, alvera) Oxidise(tuesday, alvera) and Misguide(tuesday, alvera) and forall x (Oxidise(x, alvera) and Misguide(x, alvera) -> Oxidise(alvera, tuesday)) -> therefore Oxidise(alvera, tuesday)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The brigitte overcrop the linnea. The brigitte is squishy. The brigitte does not see the linnea. The brigitte cornice the linnea. The hector overcrop the linnea. The hector inveigh the brigitte. The hector inveigh the linnea. The hector cornice the linnea. The linnea overcrop the hector. The linnea is beardless. The linnea is not noiseless. The linnea does not see the hector. If something cornice the brigitte and it inveigh the brigitte then the brigitte cornice the hector. If something is sprouted and it inveigh the brigitte then the brigitte does not see the linnea. If something overcrop the linnea then it cornice the brigitte. The brigitte does not visit the hector.", "logic": "\nOvercrop(brigitte, linnea)\nSquishy(brigitte)\nnot Inveigh(brigitte, linnea)\nCornice(brigitte, linnea)\nOvercrop(hector, linnea)\nInveigh(hector, brigitte)\nInveigh(hector, linnea)\nCornice(hector, linnea)\nOvercrop(linnea, hector)\nBeardless(linnea)\nnot Noiseless(linnea)\nnot Inveigh(linnea, hector)\nforall x (Cornice(x, brigitte) and Inveigh(x, brigitte) -> Cornice(brigitte, hector))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) and Inveigh(x, brigitte) -> not Inveigh(brigitte, linnea))\nforall x (Overcrop(x, linnea) -> Cornice(x, brigitte))\n\nnot Cornice(brigitte, hector)\n\nOvercrop(hector, linnea) and forall x (Overcrop(x, linnea) -> Cornice(x, brigitte)) -> therefore Cornice(hector, brigitte) Cornice(hector, brigitte) and Inveigh(hector, brigitte) and forall x (Cornice(x, brigitte) and Inveigh(x, brigitte) -> Cornice(brigitte, hector)) -> therefore Cornice(brigitte, hector)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The henriette displace the layney. The henriette is evanescent. The henriette does not see the layney. The henriette riff the layney. The englebart displace the layney. The englebart footnote the henriette. The englebart footnote the layney. The englebart riff the layney. The layney displace the englebart. The layney is cuprous. The layney is not euphonic. The layney does not see the englebart. If something riff the henriette and it footnote the henriette then the henriette riff the englebart. If something is unbiassed and it footnote the henriette then the henriette does not see the layney. If something displace the layney then it riff the henriette. The layney does not visit the henriette.", "logic": "\nDisplace(henriette, layney)\nEvanescent(henriette)\nnot Footnote(henriette, layney)\nRiff(henriette, layney)\nDisplace(englebart, layney)\nFootnote(englebart, henriette)\nFootnote(englebart, layney)\nRiff(englebart, layney)\nDisplace(layney, englebart)\nCuprous(layney)\nnot Euphonic(layney)\nnot Footnote(layney, englebart)\nforall x (Riff(x, henriette) and Footnote(x, henriette) -> Riff(henriette, englebart))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Footnote(x, henriette) -> not Footnote(henriette, layney))\nforall x (Displace(x, layney) -> Riff(x, henriette))\n\nnot Riff(layney, henriette)\n\nforall x (Displace(x, layney) -> Riff(x, henriette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The shalna approach the ansell. The shalna is splendid. The shalna does not see the ansell. The shalna brutalise the ansell. The wit approach the ansell. The wit drub the shalna. The wit drub the ansell. The wit brutalise the ansell. The ansell approach the wit. The ansell is wizardly. The ansell is not fatal. The ansell does not see the wit. If something brutalise the shalna and it drub the shalna then the shalna brutalise the wit. If something is romani and it drub the shalna then the shalna does not see the ansell. If something approach the ansell then it brutalise the shalna. The ansell brutalise the ansell.", "logic": "\nApproach(shalna, ansell)\nSplendid(shalna)\nnot Drub(shalna, ansell)\nBrutalise(shalna, ansell)\nApproach(wit, ansell)\nDrub(wit, shalna)\nDrub(wit, ansell)\nBrutalise(wit, ansell)\nApproach(ansell, wit)\nWizardly(ansell)\nnot Fatal(ansell)\nnot Drub(ansell, wit)\nforall x (Brutalise(x, shalna) and Drub(x, shalna) -> Brutalise(shalna, wit))\nforall x (Romani(x) and Drub(x, shalna) -> not Drub(shalna, ansell))\nforall x (Approach(x, ansell) -> Brutalise(x, shalna))\n\nBrutalise(ansell, ansell)\n\nBrutalise(ansell, ansell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The bailie swosh the maison. The bailie is bloodless. The bailie does not see the maison. The bailie patch the maison. The darian swosh the maison. The darian refurbish the bailie. The darian refurbish the maison. The darian patch the maison. The maison swosh the darian. The maison is angelical. The maison is not allergenic. The maison does not see the darian. If something patch the bailie and it refurbish the bailie then the bailie patch the darian. If something is noisy and it refurbish the bailie then the bailie does not see the maison. If something swosh the maison then it patch the bailie. The bailie is not cold.", "logic": "\nSwosh(bailie, maison)\nBloodless(bailie)\nnot Refurbish(bailie, maison)\nPatch(bailie, maison)\nSwosh(darian, maison)\nRefurbish(darian, bailie)\nRefurbish(darian, maison)\nPatch(darian, maison)\nSwosh(maison, darian)\nAngelical(maison)\nnot Allergenic(maison)\nnot Refurbish(maison, darian)\nforall x (Patch(x, bailie) and Refurbish(x, bailie) -> Patch(bailie, darian))\nforall x (Noisy(x) and Refurbish(x, bailie) -> not Refurbish(bailie, maison))\nforall x (Swosh(x, maison) -> Patch(x, bailie))\n\nnot Cold(bailie)\n\nnot Cold(bailie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The justin customize the dixie. The justin is palpatory. The justin does not see the dixie. The justin absent the dixie. The corri customize the dixie. The corri segregate the justin. The corri segregate the dixie. The corri absent the dixie. The dixie customize the corri. The dixie is outward. The dixie is not ebionite. The dixie does not see the corri. If something absent the justin and it segregate the justin then the justin absent the corri. If something is found and it segregate the justin then the justin does not see the dixie. If something customize the dixie then it absent the justin. The corri is ebionite.", "logic": "\nCustomize(justin, dixie)\nPalpatory(justin)\nnot Segregate(justin, dixie)\nAbsent(justin, dixie)\nCustomize(corri, dixie)\nSegregate(corri, justin)\nSegregate(corri, dixie)\nAbsent(corri, dixie)\nCustomize(dixie, corri)\nOutward(dixie)\nnot Ebionite(dixie)\nnot Segregate(dixie, corri)\nforall x (Absent(x, justin) and Segregate(x, justin) -> Absent(justin, corri))\nforall x (Found(x) and Segregate(x, justin) -> not Segregate(justin, dixie))\nforall x (Customize(x, dixie) -> Absent(x, justin))\n\nEbionite(corri)\n\nEbionite(corri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The skipton suppose the catina. The skipton is aspiring. The skipton does not see the catina. The skipton invalidate the catina. The venita suppose the catina. The venita saccharify the skipton. The venita saccharify the catina. The venita invalidate the catina. The catina suppose the venita. The catina is autonomous. The catina is not scratchy. The catina does not see the venita. If something invalidate the skipton and it saccharify the skipton then the skipton invalidate the venita. If something is luxuriant and it saccharify the skipton then the skipton does not see the catina. If something suppose the catina then it invalidate the skipton. The venita is not aspiring.", "logic": "\nSuppose(skipton, catina)\nAspiring(skipton)\nnot Saccharify(skipton, catina)\nInvalidate(skipton, catina)\nSuppose(venita, catina)\nSaccharify(venita, skipton)\nSaccharify(venita, catina)\nInvalidate(venita, catina)\nSuppose(catina, venita)\nAutonomous(catina)\nnot Scratchy(catina)\nnot Saccharify(catina, venita)\nforall x (Invalidate(x, skipton) and Saccharify(x, skipton) -> Invalidate(skipton, venita))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) and Saccharify(x, skipton) -> not Saccharify(skipton, catina))\nforall x (Suppose(x, catina) -> Invalidate(x, skipton))\n\nnot Aspiring(venita)\n\nnot Aspiring(venita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "The berte sniffle the bride. The berte is rococo. The berte does not see the bride. The berte extend the bride. The adina sniffle the bride. The adina redispose the berte. The adina redispose the bride. The adina extend the bride. The bride sniffle the adina. The bride is hard. The bride is not impetuous. The bride does not see the adina. If something extend the berte and it redispose the berte then the berte extend the adina. If something is chaffy and it redispose the berte then the berte does not see the bride. If something sniffle the bride then it extend the berte. The bride extend the adina.", "logic": "\nSniffle(berte, bride)\nRococo(berte)\nnot Redispose(berte, bride)\nExtend(berte, bride)\nSniffle(adina, bride)\nRedispose(adina, berte)\nRedispose(adina, bride)\nExtend(adina, bride)\nSniffle(bride, adina)\nHard(bride)\nnot Impetuous(bride)\nnot Redispose(bride, adina)\nforall x (Extend(x, berte) and Redispose(x, berte) -> Extend(berte, adina))\nforall x (Chaffy(x) and Redispose(x, berte) -> not Redispose(berte, bride))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, bride) -> Extend(x, berte))\n\nExtend(bride, adina)\n\nExtend(bride, adina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-179"} {"premises": "Rutledge is sarcastic. Daphene is faraway. Daphene is colourful. Green people are sarcastic. Cold people are faraway. Nice, faraway people are niggardly. Round, niggardly people are shabby. If someone is niggardly then they are built. If someone is colourful and bipinnate then they are niggardly. If someone is colourful and faraway then they are sarcastic. Green people are bipinnate. Rutledge is sarcastic.", "logic": "\nSarcastic(rutledge)\nFaraway(daphene)\nColourful(daphene)\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Sarcastic(x))\nforall x (Built(x) -> Faraway(x))\nforall x (Sarcastic(x) and Faraway(x) -> Niggardly(x))\nforall x (Faraway(x) and Niggardly(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Built(x))\nforall x (Colourful(x) and Bipinnate(x) -> Niggardly(x))\nforall x (Colourful(x) and Faraway(x) -> Sarcastic(x))\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Bipinnate(x))\n\nSarcastic(rutledge)\n\ntherefore Sarcastic(rutledge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Belva is cuspate. Hermina is enchained. Hermina is amylolytic. Green people are cuspate. Cold people are enchained. Nice, enchained people are heard. Round, heard people are patterned. If someone is heard then they are unseeing. If someone is amylolytic and tremulous then they are heard. If someone is amylolytic and enchained then they are cuspate. Green people are tremulous. Hermina is not enchained.", "logic": "\nCuspate(belva)\nEnchained(hermina)\nAmylolytic(hermina)\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Unseeing(x) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Cuspate(x) and Enchained(x) -> Heard(x))\nforall x (Enchained(x) and Heard(x) -> Patterned(x))\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Unseeing(x))\nforall x (Amylolytic(x) and Tremulous(x) -> Heard(x))\nforall x (Amylolytic(x) and Enchained(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Tremulous(x))\n\nnot Enchained(hermina)\n\ntherefore Enchained(hermina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Milton is astomatous. Dwayne is precative. Dwayne is astatic. Green people are astomatous. Cold people are precative. Nice, precative people are catabatic. Round, catabatic people are doric. If someone is catabatic then they are lateral. If someone is astatic and waterproof then they are catabatic. If someone is astatic and precative then they are astomatous. Green people are waterproof. Dwayne is astomatous.", "logic": "\nAstomatous(milton)\nPrecative(dwayne)\nAstatic(dwayne)\nforall x (Catabatic(x) -> Astomatous(x))\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Precative(x))\nforall x (Astomatous(x) and Precative(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nforall x (Precative(x) and Catabatic(x) -> Doric(x))\nforall x (Catabatic(x) -> Lateral(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Waterproof(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Precative(x) -> Astomatous(x))\nforall x (Catabatic(x) -> Waterproof(x))\n\nAstomatous(dwayne)\n\nAstatic(dwayne) and Precative(dwayne) and forall x (Astatic(x) and Precative(x) -> Astomatous(x)) -> therefore Astomatous(dwayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Sheelagh is biomedical. Kipp is crazed. Kipp is foodless. Green people are biomedical. Cold people are crazed. Nice, crazed people are succeeding. Round, succeeding people are superfine. If someone is succeeding then they are primo. If someone is foodless and untactful then they are succeeding. If someone is foodless and crazed then they are biomedical. Green people are untactful. Kipp is not biomedical.", "logic": "\nBiomedical(sheelagh)\nCrazed(kipp)\nFoodless(kipp)\nforall x (Succeeding(x) -> Biomedical(x))\nforall x (Primo(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Biomedical(x) and Crazed(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) and Succeeding(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Succeeding(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Foodless(x) and Untactful(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Foodless(x) and Crazed(x) -> Biomedical(x))\nforall x (Succeeding(x) -> Untactful(x))\n\nnot Biomedical(kipp)\n\nFoodless(kipp) and Crazed(kipp) and forall x (Foodless(x) and Crazed(x) -> Biomedical(x)) -> therefore Biomedical(kipp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Brit is mozartean. Maible is acellular. Maible is hyperemic. Green people are mozartean. Cold people are acellular. Nice, acellular people are disgusting. Round, disgusting people are airlike. If someone is disgusting then they are sinless. If someone is hyperemic and probative then they are disgusting. If someone is hyperemic and acellular then they are mozartean. Green people are probative. Maible is disgusting.", "logic": "\nMozartean(brit)\nAcellular(maible)\nHyperemic(maible)\nforall x (Disgusting(x) -> Mozartean(x))\nforall x (Sinless(x) -> Acellular(x))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) and Acellular(x) -> Disgusting(x))\nforall x (Acellular(x) and Disgusting(x) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Disgusting(x) -> Sinless(x))\nforall x (Hyperemic(x) and Probative(x) -> Disgusting(x))\nforall x (Hyperemic(x) and Acellular(x) -> Mozartean(x))\nforall x (Disgusting(x) -> Probative(x))\n\nDisgusting(maible)\n\nHyperemic(maible) and Acellular(maible) and forall x (Hyperemic(x) and Acellular(x) -> Mozartean(x)) -> therefore Mozartean(maible) Mozartean(maible) and Acellular(maible) and forall x (Mozartean(x) and Acellular(x) -> Disgusting(x)) -> therefore Disgusting(maible)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Fancy is terrifying. Mason is ringleted. Mason is pacifist. Green people are terrifying. Cold people are ringleted. Nice, ringleted people are molten. Round, molten people are dendriform. If someone is molten then they are treeless. If someone is pacifist and concave then they are molten. If someone is pacifist and ringleted then they are terrifying. Green people are concave. Mason is not molten.", "logic": "\nTerrifying(fancy)\nRingleted(mason)\nPacifist(mason)\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Terrifying(x))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Terrifying(x) and Ringleted(x) -> Molten(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) and Molten(x) -> Dendriform(x))\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Pacifist(x) and Concave(x) -> Molten(x))\nforall x (Pacifist(x) and Ringleted(x) -> Terrifying(x))\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Concave(x))\n\nnot Molten(mason)\n\nPacifist(mason) and Ringleted(mason) and forall x (Pacifist(x) and Ringleted(x) -> Terrifying(x)) -> therefore Terrifying(mason) Terrifying(mason) and Ringleted(mason) and forall x (Terrifying(x) and Ringleted(x) -> Molten(x)) -> therefore Molten(mason)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Hewe is peristylar. Jemima is illegible. Jemima is campanular. Green people are peristylar. Cold people are illegible. Nice, illegible people are tautologic. Round, tautologic people are unstarred. If someone is tautologic then they are accustomed. If someone is campanular and stung then they are tautologic. If someone is campanular and illegible then they are peristylar. Green people are stung. Hewe is not tautologic.", "logic": "\nPeristylar(hewe)\nIllegible(jemima)\nCampanular(jemima)\nforall x (Tautologic(x) -> Peristylar(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Illegible(x))\nforall x (Peristylar(x) and Illegible(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nforall x (Illegible(x) and Tautologic(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Tautologic(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Campanular(x) and Stung(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nforall x (Campanular(x) and Illegible(x) -> Peristylar(x))\nforall x (Tautologic(x) -> Stung(x))\n\nnot Tautologic(hewe)\n\nforall x (Peristylar(x) and Illegible(x) -> Tautologic(x)) <- forall x (Accustomed(x) -> Illegible(x)) <- forall x (Tautologic(x) -> Accustomed(x)) <- forall x (Campanular(x) and Stung(x) -> Tautologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Silvano is assailable. Anthea is jittering. Anthea is pitchy. Green people are assailable. Cold people are jittering. Nice, jittering people are current. Round, current people are clotted. If someone is current then they are pyretic. If someone is pitchy and septrional then they are current. If someone is pitchy and jittering then they are assailable. Green people are septrional. Silvano is septrional.", "logic": "\nAssailable(silvano)\nJittering(anthea)\nPitchy(anthea)\nforall x (Current(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Jittering(x))\nforall x (Assailable(x) and Jittering(x) -> Current(x))\nforall x (Jittering(x) and Current(x) -> Clotted(x))\nforall x (Current(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) and Septrional(x) -> Current(x))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) and Jittering(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Current(x) -> Septrional(x))\n\nSeptrional(silvano)\n\nforall x (Current(x) -> Septrional(x)) <- forall x (Assailable(x) and Jittering(x) -> Current(x)) <- forall x (Pyretic(x) -> Jittering(x)) <- forall x (Current(x) -> Pyretic(x)) <- forall x (Pitchy(x) and Septrional(x) -> Current(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Audrye is younger. Waylin is tropic. Waylin is venomous. Green people are younger. Cold people are tropic. Nice, tropic people are tomentous. Round, tomentous people are outbound. If someone is tomentous then they are articled. If someone is venomous and guided then they are tomentous. If someone is venomous and tropic then they are younger. Green people are guided. Audrye is not tropic.", "logic": "\nYounger(audrye)\nTropic(waylin)\nVenomous(waylin)\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Younger(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Tropic(x))\nforall x (Younger(x) and Tropic(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) and Tomentous(x) -> Outbound(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Venomous(x) and Guided(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Venomous(x) and Tropic(x) -> Younger(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Guided(x))\n\nnot Tropic(audrye)\n\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Tropic(x)) <- forall x (Tomentous(x) -> Articled(x)) <- forall x (Younger(x) and Tropic(x) -> Tomentous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "Edee is arcuate. Sabina is cosmetic. Sabina is nuts. Green people are arcuate. Cold people are cosmetic. Nice, cosmetic people are rural. Round, rural people are contrite. If someone is rural then they are plodding. If someone is nuts and unwarmed then they are rural. If someone is nuts and cosmetic then they are arcuate. Green people are unwarmed. Edee is nuts.", "logic": "\nArcuate(edee)\nCosmetic(sabina)\nNuts(sabina)\nforall x (Rural(x) -> Arcuate(x))\nforall x (Plodding(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Arcuate(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) and Rural(x) -> Contrite(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) -> Plodding(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Unwarmed(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> Arcuate(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) -> Unwarmed(x))\n\nNuts(edee)\n\nNuts(edee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1270"} {"premises": "The marlane reaffirm the lemuel. The micki reaffirm the daniela. The lemuel spawn the micki. The daniela does not chase the lemuel. If someone saute the lemuel then they are shattered. If the micki is articulary and the micki is premium then the micki does not like the marlane. If someone reaffirm the daniela then the daniela saute the lemuel. If someone is anestric and not moonless then they chase the micki. If the lemuel spawn the marlane and the lemuel is articulary then the lemuel spawn the daniela. If someone saute the micki then the micki saute the daniela. If someone is premium and they chase the marlane then the marlane does not like the lemuel. If someone saute the lemuel and they do not see the daniela then the daniela does not like the micki. The daniela does not chase the lemuel.", "logic": "\nReaffirm(marlane, lemuel)\nReaffirm(micki, daniela)\nSpawn(lemuel, micki)\nnot Reaffirm(daniela, lemuel)\nforall x (Saute(x, lemuel) -> Shattered(x))\nArticulary(micki) and Premium(micki) -> not Spawn(micki, marlane)\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, daniela) -> Saute(daniela, lemuel))\nforall x (Anestric(x) and not Moonless(x) -> Reaffirm(x, micki))\nSpawn(lemuel, marlane) and Articulary(lemuel) -> Spawn(lemuel, daniela)\nforall x (Saute(x, micki) -> Saute(micki, daniela))\nforall x (Premium(x) and Reaffirm(x, marlane) -> not Spawn(marlane, lemuel))\nforall x (Saute(x, lemuel) and not Saute(x, daniela) -> not Spawn(daniela, micki))\n\nnot Reaffirm(daniela, lemuel)\n\ntherefore not Reaffirm(daniela, lemuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The wallas precis the herculie. The taber precis the caresse. The herculie mythicise the taber. The caresse does not chase the herculie. If someone glance the herculie then they are perplexing. If the taber is goaded and the taber is assiduous then the taber does not like the wallas. If someone precis the caresse then the caresse glance the herculie. If someone is militant and not newsworthy then they chase the taber. If the herculie mythicise the wallas and the herculie is goaded then the herculie mythicise the caresse. If someone glance the taber then the taber glance the caresse. If someone is assiduous and they chase the wallas then the wallas does not like the herculie. If someone glance the herculie and they do not see the caresse then the caresse does not like the taber. The wallas does not chase the herculie.", "logic": "\nPrecis(wallas, herculie)\nPrecis(taber, caresse)\nMythicise(herculie, taber)\nnot Precis(caresse, herculie)\nforall x (Glance(x, herculie) -> Perplexing(x))\nGoaded(taber) and Assiduous(taber) -> not Mythicise(taber, wallas)\nforall x (Precis(x, caresse) -> Glance(caresse, herculie))\nforall x (Militant(x) and not Newsworthy(x) -> Precis(x, taber))\nMythicise(herculie, wallas) and Goaded(herculie) -> Mythicise(herculie, caresse)\nforall x (Glance(x, taber) -> Glance(taber, caresse))\nforall x (Assiduous(x) and Precis(x, wallas) -> not Mythicise(wallas, herculie))\nforall x (Glance(x, herculie) and not Glance(x, caresse) -> not Mythicise(caresse, taber))\n\nnot Precis(wallas, herculie)\n\ntherefore Precis(wallas, herculie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The moyna revisit the davide. The bunni revisit the corissa. The davide uplift the bunni. The corissa does not chase the davide. If someone infiltrate the davide then they are lingulate. If the bunni is disparate and the bunni is byzantine then the bunni does not like the moyna. If someone revisit the corissa then the corissa infiltrate the davide. If someone is mysophobic and not trembling then they chase the bunni. If the davide uplift the moyna and the davide is disparate then the davide uplift the corissa. If someone infiltrate the bunni then the bunni infiltrate the corissa. If someone is byzantine and they chase the moyna then the moyna does not like the davide. If someone infiltrate the davide and they do not see the corissa then the corissa does not like the bunni. The corissa infiltrate the davide.", "logic": "\nRevisit(moyna, davide)\nRevisit(bunni, corissa)\nUplift(davide, bunni)\nnot Revisit(corissa, davide)\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, davide) -> Lingulate(x))\nDisparate(bunni) and Byzantine(bunni) -> not Uplift(bunni, moyna)\nforall x (Revisit(x, corissa) -> Infiltrate(corissa, davide))\nforall x (Mysophobic(x) and not Trembling(x) -> Revisit(x, bunni))\nUplift(davide, moyna) and Disparate(davide) -> Uplift(davide, corissa)\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, bunni) -> Infiltrate(bunni, corissa))\nforall x (Byzantine(x) and Revisit(x, moyna) -> not Uplift(moyna, davide))\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, davide) and not Infiltrate(x, corissa) -> not Uplift(corissa, bunni))\n\nInfiltrate(corissa, davide)\n\nRevisit(bunni, corissa) and forall x (Revisit(x, corissa) -> Infiltrate(corissa, davide)) -> therefore Infiltrate(corissa, davide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The reg offend the hynda. The sivert offend the eda. The hynda profile the sivert. The eda does not chase the hynda. If someone endorse the hynda then they are sixpenny. If the sivert is strenuous and the sivert is imputable then the sivert does not like the reg. If someone offend the eda then the eda endorse the hynda. If someone is katabatic and not married then they chase the sivert. If the hynda profile the reg and the hynda is strenuous then the hynda profile the eda. If someone endorse the sivert then the sivert endorse the eda. If someone is imputable and they chase the reg then the reg does not like the hynda. If someone endorse the hynda and they do not see the eda then the eda does not like the sivert. The eda does not see the hynda.", "logic": "\nOffend(reg, hynda)\nOffend(sivert, eda)\nProfile(hynda, sivert)\nnot Offend(eda, hynda)\nforall x (Endorse(x, hynda) -> Sixpenny(x))\nStrenuous(sivert) and Imputable(sivert) -> not Profile(sivert, reg)\nforall x (Offend(x, eda) -> Endorse(eda, hynda))\nforall x (Katabatic(x) and not Married(x) -> Offend(x, sivert))\nProfile(hynda, reg) and Strenuous(hynda) -> Profile(hynda, eda)\nforall x (Endorse(x, sivert) -> Endorse(sivert, eda))\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Offend(x, reg) -> not Profile(reg, hynda))\nforall x (Endorse(x, hynda) and not Endorse(x, eda) -> not Profile(eda, sivert))\n\nnot Endorse(eda, hynda)\n\nOffend(sivert, eda) and forall x (Offend(x, eda) -> Endorse(eda, hynda)) -> therefore Endorse(eda, hynda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The thornie benday the renault. The marga benday the angy. The renault promulgate the marga. The angy does not chase the renault. If someone howl the renault then they are slim. If the marga is corky and the marga is posthumous then the marga does not like the thornie. If someone benday the angy then the angy howl the renault. If someone is genetic and not rooted then they chase the marga. If the renault promulgate the thornie and the renault is corky then the renault promulgate the angy. If someone howl the marga then the marga howl the angy. If someone is posthumous and they chase the thornie then the thornie does not like the renault. If someone howl the renault and they do not see the angy then the angy does not like the marga. The angy is slim.", "logic": "\nBenday(thornie, renault)\nBenday(marga, angy)\nPromulgate(renault, marga)\nnot Benday(angy, renault)\nforall x (Howl(x, renault) -> Slim(x))\nCorky(marga) and Posthumous(marga) -> not Promulgate(marga, thornie)\nforall x (Benday(x, angy) -> Howl(angy, renault))\nforall x (Genetic(x) and not Rooted(x) -> Benday(x, marga))\nPromulgate(renault, thornie) and Corky(renault) -> Promulgate(renault, angy)\nforall x (Howl(x, marga) -> Howl(marga, angy))\nforall x (Posthumous(x) and Benday(x, thornie) -> not Promulgate(thornie, renault))\nforall x (Howl(x, renault) and not Howl(x, angy) -> not Promulgate(angy, marga))\n\nSlim(angy)\n\nBenday(marga, angy) and forall x (Benday(x, angy) -> Howl(angy, renault)) -> therefore Howl(angy, renault) Howl(angy, renault) and forall x (Howl(x, renault) -> Slim(x)) -> therefore Slim(angy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The charita eternalize the mika. The gaylene eternalize the vick. The mika deface the gaylene. The vick does not chase the mika. If someone quash the mika then they are preserved. If the gaylene is northmost and the gaylene is incarnate then the gaylene does not like the charita. If someone eternalize the vick then the vick quash the mika. If someone is over and not reckless then they chase the gaylene. If the mika deface the charita and the mika is northmost then the mika deface the vick. If someone quash the gaylene then the gaylene quash the vick. If someone is incarnate and they chase the charita then the charita does not like the mika. If someone quash the mika and they do not see the vick then the vick does not like the gaylene. The vick is not preserved.", "logic": "\nEternalize(charita, mika)\nEternalize(gaylene, vick)\nDeface(mika, gaylene)\nnot Eternalize(vick, mika)\nforall x (Quash(x, mika) -> Preserved(x))\nNorthmost(gaylene) and Incarnate(gaylene) -> not Deface(gaylene, charita)\nforall x (Eternalize(x, vick) -> Quash(vick, mika))\nforall x (Over(x) and not Reckless(x) -> Eternalize(x, gaylene))\nDeface(mika, charita) and Northmost(mika) -> Deface(mika, vick)\nforall x (Quash(x, gaylene) -> Quash(gaylene, vick))\nforall x (Incarnate(x) and Eternalize(x, charita) -> not Deface(charita, mika))\nforall x (Quash(x, mika) and not Quash(x, vick) -> not Deface(vick, gaylene))\n\nnot Preserved(vick)\n\nEternalize(gaylene, vick) and forall x (Eternalize(x, vick) -> Quash(vick, mika)) -> therefore Quash(vick, mika) Quash(vick, mika) and forall x (Quash(x, mika) -> Preserved(x)) -> therefore Preserved(vick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The hortensia distill the hiram. The sheffield distill the carree. The hiram trademark the sheffield. The carree does not chase the hiram. If someone slum the hiram then they are sarcosomal. If the sheffield is senior and the sheffield is baggy then the sheffield does not like the hortensia. If someone distill the carree then the carree slum the hiram. If someone is untiring and not impacted then they chase the sheffield. If the hiram trademark the hortensia and the hiram is senior then the hiram trademark the carree. If someone slum the sheffield then the sheffield slum the carree. If someone is baggy and they chase the hortensia then the hortensia does not like the hiram. If someone slum the hiram and they do not see the carree then the carree does not like the sheffield. The carree does not chase the sheffield.", "logic": "\nDistill(hortensia, hiram)\nDistill(sheffield, carree)\nTrademark(hiram, sheffield)\nnot Distill(carree, hiram)\nforall x (Slum(x, hiram) -> Sarcosomal(x))\nSenior(sheffield) and Baggy(sheffield) -> not Trademark(sheffield, hortensia)\nforall x (Distill(x, carree) -> Slum(carree, hiram))\nforall x (Untiring(x) and not Impacted(x) -> Distill(x, sheffield))\nTrademark(hiram, hortensia) and Senior(hiram) -> Trademark(hiram, carree)\nforall x (Slum(x, sheffield) -> Slum(sheffield, carree))\nforall x (Baggy(x) and Distill(x, hortensia) -> not Trademark(hortensia, hiram))\nforall x (Slum(x, hiram) and not Slum(x, carree) -> not Trademark(carree, sheffield))\n\nnot Distill(carree, sheffield)\n\nforall x (Untiring(x) and not Impacted(x) -> Distill(x, sheffield)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The lilias unleash the alena. The goldina unleash the antonio. The alena hustle the goldina. The antonio does not chase the alena. If someone array the alena then they are piercing. If the goldina is detached and the goldina is terefah then the goldina does not like the lilias. If someone unleash the antonio then the antonio array the alena. If someone is cozy and not ransacked then they chase the goldina. If the alena hustle the lilias and the alena is detached then the alena hustle the antonio. If someone array the goldina then the goldina array the antonio. If someone is terefah and they chase the lilias then the lilias does not like the alena. If someone array the alena and they do not see the antonio then the antonio does not like the goldina. The goldina unleash the goldina.", "logic": "\nUnleash(lilias, alena)\nUnleash(goldina, antonio)\nHustle(alena, goldina)\nnot Unleash(antonio, alena)\nforall x (Array(x, alena) -> Piercing(x))\nDetached(goldina) and Terefah(goldina) -> not Hustle(goldina, lilias)\nforall x (Unleash(x, antonio) -> Array(antonio, alena))\nforall x (Cozy(x) and not Ransacked(x) -> Unleash(x, goldina))\nHustle(alena, lilias) and Detached(alena) -> Hustle(alena, antonio)\nforall x (Array(x, goldina) -> Array(goldina, antonio))\nforall x (Terefah(x) and Unleash(x, lilias) -> not Hustle(lilias, alena))\nforall x (Array(x, alena) and not Array(x, antonio) -> not Hustle(antonio, goldina))\n\nUnleash(goldina, goldina)\n\nforall x (Cozy(x) and not Ransacked(x) -> Unleash(x, goldina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The ophelia paralyze the jessi. The janella paralyze the velvet. The jessi desalinate the janella. The velvet does not chase the jessi. If someone illegalize the jessi then they are bottom. If the janella is wrought and the janella is connate then the janella does not like the ophelia. If someone paralyze the velvet then the velvet illegalize the jessi. If someone is officious and not still then they chase the janella. If the jessi desalinate the ophelia and the jessi is wrought then the jessi desalinate the velvet. If someone illegalize the janella then the janella illegalize the velvet. If someone is connate and they chase the ophelia then the ophelia does not like the jessi. If someone illegalize the jessi and they do not see the velvet then the velvet does not like the janella. The janella is not bottom.", "logic": "\nParalyze(ophelia, jessi)\nParalyze(janella, velvet)\nDesalinate(jessi, janella)\nnot Paralyze(velvet, jessi)\nforall x (Illegalize(x, jessi) -> Bottom(x))\nWrought(janella) and Connate(janella) -> not Desalinate(janella, ophelia)\nforall x (Paralyze(x, velvet) -> Illegalize(velvet, jessi))\nforall x (Officious(x) and not Still(x) -> Paralyze(x, janella))\nDesalinate(jessi, ophelia) and Wrought(jessi) -> Desalinate(jessi, velvet)\nforall x (Illegalize(x, janella) -> Illegalize(janella, velvet))\nforall x (Connate(x) and Paralyze(x, ophelia) -> not Desalinate(ophelia, jessi))\nforall x (Illegalize(x, jessi) and not Illegalize(x, velvet) -> not Desalinate(velvet, janella))\n\nnot Bottom(janella)\n\nforall x (Illegalize(x, jessi) -> Bottom(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The sarah sober the herschel. The leila sober the tawsha. The herschel brandmark the leila. The tawsha does not chase the herschel. If someone honor the herschel then they are slim. If the leila is tumescent and the leila is splayfoot then the leila does not like the sarah. If someone sober the tawsha then the tawsha honor the herschel. If someone is armillary and not unlawful then they chase the leila. If the herschel brandmark the sarah and the herschel is tumescent then the herschel brandmark the tawsha. If someone honor the leila then the leila honor the tawsha. If someone is splayfoot and they chase the sarah then the sarah does not like the herschel. If someone honor the herschel and they do not see the tawsha then the tawsha does not like the leila. The leila is splayfoot.", "logic": "\nSober(sarah, herschel)\nSober(leila, tawsha)\nBrandmark(herschel, leila)\nnot Sober(tawsha, herschel)\nforall x (Honor(x, herschel) -> Slim(x))\nTumescent(leila) and Splayfoot(leila) -> not Brandmark(leila, sarah)\nforall x (Sober(x, tawsha) -> Honor(tawsha, herschel))\nforall x (Armillary(x) and not Unlawful(x) -> Sober(x, leila))\nBrandmark(herschel, sarah) and Tumescent(herschel) -> Brandmark(herschel, tawsha)\nforall x (Honor(x, leila) -> Honor(leila, tawsha))\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Sober(x, sarah) -> not Brandmark(sarah, herschel))\nforall x (Honor(x, herschel) and not Honor(x, tawsha) -> not Brandmark(tawsha, leila))\n\nSplayfoot(leila)\n\nSplayfoot(leila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The bonny tamper the bailey. The caren tamper the penelope. The bailey dissipate the caren. The penelope does not chase the bailey. If someone abstain the bailey then they are kafkaesque. If the caren is gummy and the caren is checkered then the caren does not like the bonny. If someone tamper the penelope then the penelope abstain the bailey. If someone is ephemeral and not quantal then they chase the caren. If the bailey dissipate the bonny and the bailey is gummy then the bailey dissipate the penelope. If someone abstain the caren then the caren abstain the penelope. If someone is checkered and they chase the bonny then the bonny does not like the bailey. If someone abstain the bailey and they do not see the penelope then the penelope does not like the caren. The caren does not like the bailey.", "logic": "\nTamper(bonny, bailey)\nTamper(caren, penelope)\nDissipate(bailey, caren)\nnot Tamper(penelope, bailey)\nforall x (Abstain(x, bailey) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nGummy(caren) and Checkered(caren) -> not Dissipate(caren, bonny)\nforall x (Tamper(x, penelope) -> Abstain(penelope, bailey))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and not Quantal(x) -> Tamper(x, caren))\nDissipate(bailey, bonny) and Gummy(bailey) -> Dissipate(bailey, penelope)\nforall x (Abstain(x, caren) -> Abstain(caren, penelope))\nforall x (Checkered(x) and Tamper(x, bonny) -> not Dissipate(bonny, bailey))\nforall x (Abstain(x, bailey) and not Abstain(x, penelope) -> not Dissipate(penelope, caren))\n\nnot Dissipate(caren, bailey)\n\nnot Dissipate(caren, bailey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The claresta mensurate the uriel. The chauncey mensurate the marylynne. The uriel cornice the chauncey. The marylynne does not chase the uriel. If someone convoke the uriel then they are roast. If the chauncey is bindable and the chauncey is abdicable then the chauncey does not like the claresta. If someone mensurate the marylynne then the marylynne convoke the uriel. If someone is rouged and not undisputed then they chase the chauncey. If the uriel cornice the claresta and the uriel is bindable then the uriel cornice the marylynne. If someone convoke the chauncey then the chauncey convoke the marylynne. If someone is abdicable and they chase the claresta then the claresta does not like the uriel. If someone convoke the uriel and they do not see the marylynne then the marylynne does not like the chauncey. The claresta cornice the uriel.", "logic": "\nMensurate(claresta, uriel)\nMensurate(chauncey, marylynne)\nCornice(uriel, chauncey)\nnot Mensurate(marylynne, uriel)\nforall x (Convoke(x, uriel) -> Roast(x))\nBindable(chauncey) and Abdicable(chauncey) -> not Cornice(chauncey, claresta)\nforall x (Mensurate(x, marylynne) -> Convoke(marylynne, uriel))\nforall x (Rouged(x) and not Undisputed(x) -> Mensurate(x, chauncey))\nCornice(uriel, claresta) and Bindable(uriel) -> Cornice(uriel, marylynne)\nforall x (Convoke(x, chauncey) -> Convoke(chauncey, marylynne))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) and Mensurate(x, claresta) -> not Cornice(claresta, uriel))\nforall x (Convoke(x, uriel) and not Convoke(x, marylynne) -> not Cornice(marylynne, chauncey))\n\nCornice(claresta, uriel)\n\nCornice(claresta, uriel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-391"} {"premises": "The mandie is iodinated. The mandie unloose the therese. The mandie does not visit the therese. The meryl plug the therese. The meryl is not astute. The meryl is nasty. The meryl gruntle the therese. The inigo plug the therese. The inigo is vehicular. The therese unloose the inigo. The therese gruntle the mandie. The therese gruntle the meryl. If something gruntle the mandie and it plug the inigo then it does not chase the mandie. If the inigo gruntle the mandie and the inigo unloose the therese then the inigo plug the meryl. If something gruntle the meryl and it is iodinated then the meryl unloose the therese. If something plug the meryl then the meryl is vehicular. If something gruntle the therese and it is not unhappy then it gruntle the meryl. If something is vehicular then it plug the meryl. The therese unloose the inigo.", "logic": "\nIodinated(mandie)\nUnloose(mandie, therese)\nnot Gruntle(mandie, therese)\nPlug(meryl, therese)\nnot Astute(meryl)\nNasty(meryl)\nGruntle(meryl, therese)\nPlug(inigo, therese)\nVehicular(inigo)\nUnloose(therese, inigo)\nGruntle(therese, mandie)\nGruntle(therese, meryl)\nforall x (Gruntle(x, mandie) and Plug(x, inigo) -> not Plug(x, mandie))\nGruntle(inigo, mandie) and Unloose(inigo, therese) -> Plug(inigo, meryl)\nforall x (Gruntle(x, meryl) and Iodinated(x) -> Unloose(meryl, therese))\nforall x (Plug(x, meryl) -> Vehicular(meryl))\nforall x (Gruntle(x, therese) and not Unhappy(x) -> Gruntle(x, meryl))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) -> Plug(x, meryl))\n\nUnloose(therese, inigo)\n\ntherefore Unloose(therese, inigo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The schuyler is grassroots. The schuyler enrapture the alfred. The schuyler does not visit the alfred. The stevena invoke the alfred. The stevena is not corporate. The stevena is geological. The stevena sunder the alfred. The ofilia invoke the alfred. The ofilia is brag. The alfred enrapture the ofilia. The alfred sunder the schuyler. The alfred sunder the stevena. If something sunder the schuyler and it invoke the ofilia then it does not chase the schuyler. If the ofilia sunder the schuyler and the ofilia enrapture the alfred then the ofilia invoke the stevena. If something sunder the stevena and it is grassroots then the stevena enrapture the alfred. If something invoke the stevena then the stevena is brag. If something sunder the alfred and it is not tangible then it sunder the stevena. If something is brag then it invoke the stevena. The schuyler is not grassroots.", "logic": "\nGrassroots(schuyler)\nEnrapture(schuyler, alfred)\nnot Sunder(schuyler, alfred)\nInvoke(stevena, alfred)\nnot Corporate(stevena)\nGeological(stevena)\nSunder(stevena, alfred)\nInvoke(ofilia, alfred)\nBrag(ofilia)\nEnrapture(alfred, ofilia)\nSunder(alfred, schuyler)\nSunder(alfred, stevena)\nforall x (Sunder(x, schuyler) and Invoke(x, ofilia) -> not Invoke(x, schuyler))\nSunder(ofilia, schuyler) and Enrapture(ofilia, alfred) -> Invoke(ofilia, stevena)\nforall x (Sunder(x, stevena) and Grassroots(x) -> Enrapture(stevena, alfred))\nforall x (Invoke(x, stevena) -> Brag(stevena))\nforall x (Sunder(x, alfred) and not Tangible(x) -> Sunder(x, stevena))\nforall x (Brag(x) -> Invoke(x, stevena))\n\nnot Grassroots(schuyler)\n\ntherefore Grassroots(schuyler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The alexandra is gobsmacked. The alexandra inspissate the owen. The alexandra does not visit the owen. The jacquie cabal the owen. The jacquie is not esurient. The jacquie is ethnologic. The jacquie flank the owen. The michel cabal the owen. The michel is cool. The owen inspissate the michel. The owen flank the alexandra. The owen flank the jacquie. If something flank the alexandra and it cabal the michel then it does not chase the alexandra. If the michel flank the alexandra and the michel inspissate the owen then the michel cabal the jacquie. If something flank the jacquie and it is gobsmacked then the jacquie inspissate the owen. If something cabal the jacquie then the jacquie is cool. If something flank the owen and it is not lifelong then it flank the jacquie. If something is cool then it cabal the jacquie. The michel cabal the jacquie.", "logic": "\nGobsmacked(alexandra)\nInspissate(alexandra, owen)\nnot Flank(alexandra, owen)\nCabal(jacquie, owen)\nnot Esurient(jacquie)\nEthnologic(jacquie)\nFlank(jacquie, owen)\nCabal(michel, owen)\nCool(michel)\nInspissate(owen, michel)\nFlank(owen, alexandra)\nFlank(owen, jacquie)\nforall x (Flank(x, alexandra) and Cabal(x, michel) -> not Cabal(x, alexandra))\nFlank(michel, alexandra) and Inspissate(michel, owen) -> Cabal(michel, jacquie)\nforall x (Flank(x, jacquie) and Gobsmacked(x) -> Inspissate(jacquie, owen))\nforall x (Cabal(x, jacquie) -> Cool(jacquie))\nforall x (Flank(x, owen) and not Lifelong(x) -> Flank(x, jacquie))\nforall x (Cool(x) -> Cabal(x, jacquie))\n\nCabal(michel, jacquie)\n\nCool(michel) and forall x (Cool(x) -> Cabal(x, jacquie)) -> therefore Cabal(michel, jacquie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The marillin is adipose. The marillin justify the sharona. The marillin does not visit the sharona. The cybel jounce the sharona. The cybel is not recognised. The cybel is cherished. The cybel splash the sharona. The tedie jounce the sharona. The tedie is stomatous. The sharona justify the tedie. The sharona splash the marillin. The sharona splash the cybel. If something splash the marillin and it jounce the tedie then it does not chase the marillin. If the tedie splash the marillin and the tedie justify the sharona then the tedie jounce the cybel. If something splash the cybel and it is adipose then the cybel justify the sharona. If something jounce the cybel then the cybel is stomatous. If something splash the sharona and it is not manorial then it splash the cybel. If something is stomatous then it jounce the cybel. The tedie does not chase the cybel.", "logic": "\nAdipose(marillin)\nJustify(marillin, sharona)\nnot Splash(marillin, sharona)\nJounce(cybel, sharona)\nnot Recognised(cybel)\nCherished(cybel)\nSplash(cybel, sharona)\nJounce(tedie, sharona)\nStomatous(tedie)\nJustify(sharona, tedie)\nSplash(sharona, marillin)\nSplash(sharona, cybel)\nforall x (Splash(x, marillin) and Jounce(x, tedie) -> not Jounce(x, marillin))\nSplash(tedie, marillin) and Justify(tedie, sharona) -> Jounce(tedie, cybel)\nforall x (Splash(x, cybel) and Adipose(x) -> Justify(cybel, sharona))\nforall x (Jounce(x, cybel) -> Stomatous(cybel))\nforall x (Splash(x, sharona) and not Manorial(x) -> Splash(x, cybel))\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> Jounce(x, cybel))\n\nnot Jounce(tedie, cybel)\n\nStomatous(tedie) and forall x (Stomatous(x) -> Jounce(x, cybel)) -> therefore Jounce(tedie, cybel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The tomasine is luxe. The tomasine cheer the alan. The tomasine does not visit the alan. The yehudit shift the alan. The yehudit is not sore. The yehudit is habitual. The yehudit pawn the alan. The keefe shift the alan. The keefe is ceremonial. The alan cheer the keefe. The alan pawn the tomasine. The alan pawn the yehudit. If something pawn the tomasine and it shift the keefe then it does not chase the tomasine. If the keefe pawn the tomasine and the keefe cheer the alan then the keefe shift the yehudit. If something pawn the yehudit and it is luxe then the yehudit cheer the alan. If something shift the yehudit then the yehudit is ceremonial. If something pawn the alan and it is not disgusted then it pawn the yehudit. If something is ceremonial then it shift the yehudit. The yehudit is ceremonial.", "logic": "\nLuxe(tomasine)\nCheer(tomasine, alan)\nnot Pawn(tomasine, alan)\nShift(yehudit, alan)\nnot Sore(yehudit)\nHabitual(yehudit)\nPawn(yehudit, alan)\nShift(keefe, alan)\nCeremonial(keefe)\nCheer(alan, keefe)\nPawn(alan, tomasine)\nPawn(alan, yehudit)\nforall x (Pawn(x, tomasine) and Shift(x, keefe) -> not Shift(x, tomasine))\nPawn(keefe, tomasine) and Cheer(keefe, alan) -> Shift(keefe, yehudit)\nforall x (Pawn(x, yehudit) and Luxe(x) -> Cheer(yehudit, alan))\nforall x (Shift(x, yehudit) -> Ceremonial(yehudit))\nforall x (Pawn(x, alan) and not Disgusted(x) -> Pawn(x, yehudit))\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Shift(x, yehudit))\n\nCeremonial(yehudit)\n\nCeremonial(keefe) and forall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Shift(x, yehudit)) -> therefore Shift(keefe, yehudit) Shift(keefe, yehudit) and forall x (Shift(x, yehudit) -> Ceremonial(yehudit)) -> therefore Ceremonial(yehudit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The bird is unpressed. The bird roughhouse the aurelia. The bird does not visit the aurelia. The rudiger contort the aurelia. The rudiger is not unoccupied. The rudiger is geological. The rudiger parget the aurelia. The spence contort the aurelia. The spence is randomised. The aurelia roughhouse the spence. The aurelia parget the bird. The aurelia parget the rudiger. If something parget the bird and it contort the spence then it does not chase the bird. If the spence parget the bird and the spence roughhouse the aurelia then the spence contort the rudiger. If something parget the rudiger and it is unpressed then the rudiger roughhouse the aurelia. If something contort the rudiger then the rudiger is randomised. If something parget the aurelia and it is not menial then it parget the rudiger. If something is randomised then it contort the rudiger. The rudiger is not randomised.", "logic": "\nUnpressed(bird)\nRoughhouse(bird, aurelia)\nnot Parget(bird, aurelia)\nContort(rudiger, aurelia)\nnot Unoccupied(rudiger)\nGeological(rudiger)\nParget(rudiger, aurelia)\nContort(spence, aurelia)\nRandomised(spence)\nRoughhouse(aurelia, spence)\nParget(aurelia, bird)\nParget(aurelia, rudiger)\nforall x (Parget(x, bird) and Contort(x, spence) -> not Contort(x, bird))\nParget(spence, bird) and Roughhouse(spence, aurelia) -> Contort(spence, rudiger)\nforall x (Parget(x, rudiger) and Unpressed(x) -> Roughhouse(rudiger, aurelia))\nforall x (Contort(x, rudiger) -> Randomised(rudiger))\nforall x (Parget(x, aurelia) and not Menial(x) -> Parget(x, rudiger))\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> Contort(x, rudiger))\n\nnot Randomised(rudiger)\n\nRandomised(spence) and forall x (Randomised(x) -> Contort(x, rudiger)) -> therefore Contort(spence, rudiger) Contort(spence, rudiger) and forall x (Contort(x, rudiger) -> Randomised(rudiger)) -> therefore Randomised(rudiger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The vonnie is ovate. The vonnie slaver the morgana. The vonnie does not visit the morgana. The giavani plummet the morgana. The giavani is not upland. The giavani is untied. The giavani uncrate the morgana. The kristy plummet the morgana. The kristy is bulbaceous. The morgana slaver the kristy. The morgana uncrate the vonnie. The morgana uncrate the giavani. If something uncrate the vonnie and it plummet the kristy then it does not chase the vonnie. If the kristy uncrate the vonnie and the kristy slaver the morgana then the kristy plummet the giavani. If something uncrate the giavani and it is ovate then the giavani slaver the morgana. If something plummet the giavani then the giavani is bulbaceous. If something uncrate the morgana and it is not jacobean then it uncrate the giavani. If something is bulbaceous then it plummet the giavani. The vonnie does not chase the giavani.", "logic": "\nOvate(vonnie)\nSlaver(vonnie, morgana)\nnot Uncrate(vonnie, morgana)\nPlummet(giavani, morgana)\nnot Upland(giavani)\nUntied(giavani)\nUncrate(giavani, morgana)\nPlummet(kristy, morgana)\nBulbaceous(kristy)\nSlaver(morgana, kristy)\nUncrate(morgana, vonnie)\nUncrate(morgana, giavani)\nforall x (Uncrate(x, vonnie) and Plummet(x, kristy) -> not Plummet(x, vonnie))\nUncrate(kristy, vonnie) and Slaver(kristy, morgana) -> Plummet(kristy, giavani)\nforall x (Uncrate(x, giavani) and Ovate(x) -> Slaver(giavani, morgana))\nforall x (Plummet(x, giavani) -> Bulbaceous(giavani))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, morgana) and not Jacobean(x) -> Uncrate(x, giavani))\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Plummet(x, giavani))\n\nnot Plummet(vonnie, giavani)\n\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Plummet(x, giavani)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The fairfax is rangy. The fairfax shop the perla. The fairfax does not visit the perla. The cletus primp the perla. The cletus is not traveled. The cletus is continuant. The cletus outface the perla. The jeffry primp the perla. The jeffry is powered. The perla shop the jeffry. The perla outface the fairfax. The perla outface the cletus. If something outface the fairfax and it primp the jeffry then it does not chase the fairfax. If the jeffry outface the fairfax and the jeffry shop the perla then the jeffry primp the cletus. If something outface the cletus and it is rangy then the cletus shop the perla. If something primp the cletus then the cletus is powered. If something outface the perla and it is not papery then it outface the cletus. If something is powered then it primp the cletus. The cletus outface the cletus.", "logic": "\nRangy(fairfax)\nShop(fairfax, perla)\nnot Outface(fairfax, perla)\nPrimp(cletus, perla)\nnot Traveled(cletus)\nContinuant(cletus)\nOutface(cletus, perla)\nPrimp(jeffry, perla)\nPowered(jeffry)\nShop(perla, jeffry)\nOutface(perla, fairfax)\nOutface(perla, cletus)\nforall x (Outface(x, fairfax) and Primp(x, jeffry) -> not Primp(x, fairfax))\nOutface(jeffry, fairfax) and Shop(jeffry, perla) -> Primp(jeffry, cletus)\nforall x (Outface(x, cletus) and Rangy(x) -> Shop(cletus, perla))\nforall x (Primp(x, cletus) -> Powered(cletus))\nforall x (Outface(x, perla) and not Papery(x) -> Outface(x, cletus))\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Primp(x, cletus))\n\nOutface(cletus, cletus)\n\nforall x (Outface(x, perla) and not Papery(x) -> Outface(x, cletus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The orville is gravelly. The orville broider the henrie. The orville does not visit the henrie. The thurston frost the henrie. The thurston is not disjointed. The thurston is endogenous. The thurston opine the henrie. The ede frost the henrie. The ede is winy. The henrie broider the ede. The henrie opine the orville. The henrie opine the thurston. If something opine the orville and it frost the ede then it does not chase the orville. If the ede opine the orville and the ede broider the henrie then the ede frost the thurston. If something opine the thurston and it is gravelly then the thurston broider the henrie. If something frost the thurston then the thurston is winy. If something opine the henrie and it is not synonymous then it opine the thurston. If something is winy then it frost the thurston. The thurston does not see the henrie.", "logic": "\nGravelly(orville)\nBroider(orville, henrie)\nnot Opine(orville, henrie)\nFrost(thurston, henrie)\nnot Disjointed(thurston)\nEndogenous(thurston)\nOpine(thurston, henrie)\nFrost(ede, henrie)\nWiny(ede)\nBroider(henrie, ede)\nOpine(henrie, orville)\nOpine(henrie, thurston)\nforall x (Opine(x, orville) and Frost(x, ede) -> not Frost(x, orville))\nOpine(ede, orville) and Broider(ede, henrie) -> Frost(ede, thurston)\nforall x (Opine(x, thurston) and Gravelly(x) -> Broider(thurston, henrie))\nforall x (Frost(x, thurston) -> Winy(thurston))\nforall x (Opine(x, henrie) and not Synonymous(x) -> Opine(x, thurston))\nforall x (Winy(x) -> Frost(x, thurston))\n\nnot Broider(thurston, henrie)\n\nforall x (Opine(x, thurston) and Gravelly(x) -> Broider(thurston, henrie)) <- forall x (Opine(x, henrie) and not Synonymous(x) -> Opine(x, thurston)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The ingeberg is unionised. The ingeberg repent the thorpe. The ingeberg does not visit the thorpe. The natalee spondaise the thorpe. The natalee is not trophic. The natalee is untended. The natalee instance the thorpe. The yolanthe spondaise the thorpe. The yolanthe is operant. The thorpe repent the yolanthe. The thorpe instance the ingeberg. The thorpe instance the natalee. If something instance the ingeberg and it spondaise the yolanthe then it does not chase the ingeberg. If the yolanthe instance the ingeberg and the yolanthe repent the thorpe then the yolanthe spondaise the natalee. If something instance the natalee and it is unionised then the natalee repent the thorpe. If something spondaise the natalee then the natalee is operant. If something instance the thorpe and it is not execrable then it instance the natalee. If something is operant then it spondaise the natalee. The natalee repent the ingeberg.", "logic": "\nUnionised(ingeberg)\nRepent(ingeberg, thorpe)\nnot Instance(ingeberg, thorpe)\nSpondaise(natalee, thorpe)\nnot Trophic(natalee)\nUntended(natalee)\nInstance(natalee, thorpe)\nSpondaise(yolanthe, thorpe)\nOperant(yolanthe)\nRepent(thorpe, yolanthe)\nInstance(thorpe, ingeberg)\nInstance(thorpe, natalee)\nforall x (Instance(x, ingeberg) and Spondaise(x, yolanthe) -> not Spondaise(x, ingeberg))\nInstance(yolanthe, ingeberg) and Repent(yolanthe, thorpe) -> Spondaise(yolanthe, natalee)\nforall x (Instance(x, natalee) and Unionised(x) -> Repent(natalee, thorpe))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, natalee) -> Operant(natalee))\nforall x (Instance(x, thorpe) and not Execrable(x) -> Instance(x, natalee))\nforall x (Operant(x) -> Spondaise(x, natalee))\n\nRepent(natalee, ingeberg)\n\nRepent(natalee, ingeberg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The prisca is febrile. The prisca localize the magdalena. The prisca does not visit the magdalena. The norine smart the magdalena. The norine is not aphakic. The norine is needled. The norine deviate the magdalena. The katharina smart the magdalena. The katharina is pronominal. The magdalena localize the katharina. The magdalena deviate the prisca. The magdalena deviate the norine. If something deviate the prisca and it smart the katharina then it does not chase the prisca. If the katharina deviate the prisca and the katharina localize the magdalena then the katharina smart the norine. If something deviate the norine and it is febrile then the norine localize the magdalena. If something smart the norine then the norine is pronominal. If something deviate the magdalena and it is not dissonant then it deviate the norine. If something is pronominal then it smart the norine. The prisca is not needled.", "logic": "\nFebrile(prisca)\nLocalize(prisca, magdalena)\nnot Deviate(prisca, magdalena)\nSmart(norine, magdalena)\nnot Aphakic(norine)\nNeedled(norine)\nDeviate(norine, magdalena)\nSmart(katharina, magdalena)\nPronominal(katharina)\nLocalize(magdalena, katharina)\nDeviate(magdalena, prisca)\nDeviate(magdalena, norine)\nforall x (Deviate(x, prisca) and Smart(x, katharina) -> not Smart(x, prisca))\nDeviate(katharina, prisca) and Localize(katharina, magdalena) -> Smart(katharina, norine)\nforall x (Deviate(x, norine) and Febrile(x) -> Localize(norine, magdalena))\nforall x (Smart(x, norine) -> Pronominal(norine))\nforall x (Deviate(x, magdalena) and not Dissonant(x) -> Deviate(x, norine))\nforall x (Pronominal(x) -> Smart(x, norine))\n\nnot Needled(prisca)\n\nnot Needled(prisca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The ajai is caucasoid. The ajai contuse the olenka. The ajai does not visit the olenka. The teresina plagiarize the olenka. The teresina is not anomic. The teresina is ballistic. The teresina inweave the olenka. The roxine plagiarize the olenka. The roxine is sulfuric. The olenka contuse the roxine. The olenka inweave the ajai. The olenka inweave the teresina. If something inweave the ajai and it plagiarize the roxine then it does not chase the ajai. If the roxine inweave the ajai and the roxine contuse the olenka then the roxine plagiarize the teresina. If something inweave the teresina and it is caucasoid then the teresina contuse the olenka. If something plagiarize the teresina then the teresina is sulfuric. If something inweave the olenka and it is not nonwoody then it inweave the teresina. If something is sulfuric then it plagiarize the teresina. The teresina inweave the ajai.", "logic": "\nCaucasoid(ajai)\nContuse(ajai, olenka)\nnot Inweave(ajai, olenka)\nPlagiarize(teresina, olenka)\nnot Anomic(teresina)\nBallistic(teresina)\nInweave(teresina, olenka)\nPlagiarize(roxine, olenka)\nSulfuric(roxine)\nContuse(olenka, roxine)\nInweave(olenka, ajai)\nInweave(olenka, teresina)\nforall x (Inweave(x, ajai) and Plagiarize(x, roxine) -> not Plagiarize(x, ajai))\nInweave(roxine, ajai) and Contuse(roxine, olenka) -> Plagiarize(roxine, teresina)\nforall x (Inweave(x, teresina) and Caucasoid(x) -> Contuse(teresina, olenka))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, teresina) -> Sulfuric(teresina))\nforall x (Inweave(x, olenka) and not Nonwoody(x) -> Inweave(x, teresina))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Plagiarize(x, teresina))\n\nInweave(teresina, ajai)\n\nInweave(teresina, ajai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1617"} {"premises": "The marjie does not like the kristel. The marjie rope the ronnica. The marjie does not see the kristel. The ronnica flicker the kristel. The kristel wholesale the tabina. The tabina is translunar. The tabina flicker the marjie. If someone flicker the marjie then they need the tabina. If someone rope the tabina then the tabina does not need the ronnica. If the marjie flicker the tabina then the tabina is not stupefying. If someone wholesale the tabina then they do not see the tabina. If someone wholesale the marjie and the marjie rope the tabina then the marjie rope the kristel. If the kristel rope the tabina then the tabina does not see the kristel. If someone rope the kristel then the kristel flicker the marjie. If someone wholesale the marjie then the marjie rope the ronnica. The tabina is translunar.", "logic": "\nnot Wholesale(marjie, kristel)\nRope(marjie, ronnica)\nnot Flicker(marjie, kristel)\nFlicker(ronnica, kristel)\nWholesale(kristel, tabina)\nTranslunar(tabina)\nFlicker(tabina, marjie)\nforall x (Flicker(x, marjie) -> Rope(x, tabina))\nforall x (Rope(x, tabina) -> not Rope(tabina, ronnica))\nFlicker(marjie, tabina) -> not Stupefying(tabina)\nforall x (Wholesale(x, tabina) -> not Flicker(x, tabina))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, marjie) and Rope(marjie, tabina) -> Rope(marjie, kristel))\nRope(kristel, tabina) -> not Flicker(tabina, kristel)\nforall x (Rope(x, kristel) -> Flicker(kristel, marjie))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, marjie) -> Rope(marjie, ronnica))\n\nTranslunar(tabina)\n\ntherefore Translunar(tabina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The carma does not like the chloris. The carma labialise the bartlett. The carma does not see the chloris. The bartlett sequence the chloris. The chloris armour the ugo. The ugo is regulation. The ugo sequence the carma. If someone sequence the carma then they need the ugo. If someone labialise the ugo then the ugo does not need the bartlett. If the carma sequence the ugo then the ugo is not saclike. If someone armour the ugo then they do not see the ugo. If someone armour the carma and the carma labialise the ugo then the carma labialise the chloris. If the chloris labialise the ugo then the ugo does not see the chloris. If someone labialise the chloris then the chloris sequence the carma. If someone armour the carma then the carma labialise the bartlett. The ugo does not see the carma.", "logic": "\nnot Armour(carma, chloris)\nLabialise(carma, bartlett)\nnot Sequence(carma, chloris)\nSequence(bartlett, chloris)\nArmour(chloris, ugo)\nRegulation(ugo)\nSequence(ugo, carma)\nforall x (Sequence(x, carma) -> Labialise(x, ugo))\nforall x (Labialise(x, ugo) -> not Labialise(ugo, bartlett))\nSequence(carma, ugo) -> not Saclike(ugo)\nforall x (Armour(x, ugo) -> not Sequence(x, ugo))\nforall x (Armour(x, carma) and Labialise(carma, ugo) -> Labialise(carma, chloris))\nLabialise(chloris, ugo) -> not Sequence(ugo, chloris)\nforall x (Labialise(x, chloris) -> Sequence(chloris, carma))\nforall x (Armour(x, carma) -> Labialise(carma, bartlett))\n\nnot Sequence(ugo, carma)\n\ntherefore Sequence(ugo, carma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The denis does not like the gardner. The denis backbite the brandais. The denis does not see the gardner. The brandais cluck the gardner. The gardner clam the johny. The johny is swordlike. The johny cluck the denis. If someone cluck the denis then they need the johny. If someone backbite the johny then the johny does not need the brandais. If the denis cluck the johny then the johny is not saleable. If someone clam the johny then they do not see the johny. If someone clam the denis and the denis backbite the johny then the denis backbite the gardner. If the gardner backbite the johny then the johny does not see the gardner. If someone backbite the gardner then the gardner cluck the denis. If someone clam the denis then the denis backbite the brandais. The gardner does not see the johny.", "logic": "\nnot Clam(denis, gardner)\nBackbite(denis, brandais)\nnot Cluck(denis, gardner)\nCluck(brandais, gardner)\nClam(gardner, johny)\nSwordlike(johny)\nCluck(johny, denis)\nforall x (Cluck(x, denis) -> Backbite(x, johny))\nforall x (Backbite(x, johny) -> not Backbite(johny, brandais))\nCluck(denis, johny) -> not Saleable(johny)\nforall x (Clam(x, johny) -> not Cluck(x, johny))\nforall x (Clam(x, denis) and Backbite(denis, johny) -> Backbite(denis, gardner))\nBackbite(gardner, johny) -> not Cluck(johny, gardner)\nforall x (Backbite(x, gardner) -> Cluck(gardner, denis))\nforall x (Clam(x, denis) -> Backbite(denis, brandais))\n\nnot Cluck(gardner, johny)\n\nClam(gardner, johny) and forall x (Clam(x, johny) -> not Cluck(x, johny)) -> therefore not Cluck(gardner, johny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The rudyard does not like the shani. The rudyard skew the sanson. The rudyard does not see the shani. The sanson antedate the shani. The shani medicine the betteann. The betteann is aquiline. The betteann antedate the rudyard. If someone antedate the rudyard then they need the betteann. If someone skew the betteann then the betteann does not need the sanson. If the rudyard antedate the betteann then the betteann is not subjugable. If someone medicine the betteann then they do not see the betteann. If someone medicine the rudyard and the rudyard skew the betteann then the rudyard skew the shani. If the shani skew the betteann then the betteann does not see the shani. If someone skew the shani then the shani antedate the rudyard. If someone medicine the rudyard then the rudyard skew the sanson. The betteann does not need the betteann.", "logic": "\nnot Medicine(rudyard, shani)\nSkew(rudyard, sanson)\nnot Antedate(rudyard, shani)\nAntedate(sanson, shani)\nMedicine(shani, betteann)\nAquiline(betteann)\nAntedate(betteann, rudyard)\nforall x (Antedate(x, rudyard) -> Skew(x, betteann))\nforall x (Skew(x, betteann) -> not Skew(betteann, sanson))\nAntedate(rudyard, betteann) -> not Subjugable(betteann)\nforall x (Medicine(x, betteann) -> not Antedate(x, betteann))\nforall x (Medicine(x, rudyard) and Skew(rudyard, betteann) -> Skew(rudyard, shani))\nSkew(shani, betteann) -> not Antedate(betteann, shani)\nforall x (Skew(x, shani) -> Antedate(shani, rudyard))\nforall x (Medicine(x, rudyard) -> Skew(rudyard, sanson))\n\nnot Skew(betteann, betteann)\n\nAntedate(betteann, rudyard) and forall x (Antedate(x, rudyard) -> Skew(x, betteann)) -> therefore Skew(betteann, betteann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The lila does not like the elton. The lila piddle the pepe. The lila does not see the elton. The pepe disforest the elton. The elton gamble the rosalyn. The rosalyn is manlike. The rosalyn disforest the lila. If someone disforest the lila then they need the rosalyn. If someone piddle the rosalyn then the rosalyn does not need the pepe. If the lila disforest the rosalyn then the rosalyn is not burry. If someone gamble the rosalyn then they do not see the rosalyn. If someone gamble the lila and the lila piddle the rosalyn then the lila piddle the elton. If the elton piddle the rosalyn then the rosalyn does not see the elton. If someone piddle the elton then the elton disforest the lila. If someone gamble the lila then the lila piddle the pepe. The rosalyn does not need the pepe.", "logic": "\nnot Gamble(lila, elton)\nPiddle(lila, pepe)\nnot Disforest(lila, elton)\nDisforest(pepe, elton)\nGamble(elton, rosalyn)\nManlike(rosalyn)\nDisforest(rosalyn, lila)\nforall x (Disforest(x, lila) -> Piddle(x, rosalyn))\nforall x (Piddle(x, rosalyn) -> not Piddle(rosalyn, pepe))\nDisforest(lila, rosalyn) -> not Burry(rosalyn)\nforall x (Gamble(x, rosalyn) -> not Disforest(x, rosalyn))\nforall x (Gamble(x, lila) and Piddle(lila, rosalyn) -> Piddle(lila, elton))\nPiddle(elton, rosalyn) -> not Disforest(rosalyn, elton)\nforall x (Piddle(x, elton) -> Disforest(elton, lila))\nforall x (Gamble(x, lila) -> Piddle(lila, pepe))\n\nnot Piddle(rosalyn, pepe)\n\nDisforest(rosalyn, lila) and forall x (Disforest(x, lila) -> Piddle(x, rosalyn)) -> therefore Piddle(rosalyn, rosalyn) Piddle(rosalyn, rosalyn) and forall x (Piddle(x, rosalyn) -> not Piddle(rosalyn, pepe)) -> therefore not Piddle(rosalyn, pepe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The ginelle does not like the kalvin. The ginelle manipulate the ninette. The ginelle does not see the kalvin. The ninette blackwash the kalvin. The kalvin paralyze the doralyn. The doralyn is homophile. The doralyn blackwash the ginelle. If someone blackwash the ginelle then they need the doralyn. If someone manipulate the doralyn then the doralyn does not need the ninette. If the ginelle blackwash the doralyn then the doralyn is not tweedy. If someone paralyze the doralyn then they do not see the doralyn. If someone paralyze the ginelle and the ginelle manipulate the doralyn then the ginelle manipulate the kalvin. If the kalvin manipulate the doralyn then the doralyn does not see the kalvin. If someone manipulate the kalvin then the kalvin blackwash the ginelle. If someone paralyze the ginelle then the ginelle manipulate the ninette. The doralyn manipulate the ninette.", "logic": "\nnot Paralyze(ginelle, kalvin)\nManipulate(ginelle, ninette)\nnot Blackwash(ginelle, kalvin)\nBlackwash(ninette, kalvin)\nParalyze(kalvin, doralyn)\nHomophile(doralyn)\nBlackwash(doralyn, ginelle)\nforall x (Blackwash(x, ginelle) -> Manipulate(x, doralyn))\nforall x (Manipulate(x, doralyn) -> not Manipulate(doralyn, ninette))\nBlackwash(ginelle, doralyn) -> not Tweedy(doralyn)\nforall x (Paralyze(x, doralyn) -> not Blackwash(x, doralyn))\nforall x (Paralyze(x, ginelle) and Manipulate(ginelle, doralyn) -> Manipulate(ginelle, kalvin))\nManipulate(kalvin, doralyn) -> not Blackwash(doralyn, kalvin)\nforall x (Manipulate(x, kalvin) -> Blackwash(kalvin, ginelle))\nforall x (Paralyze(x, ginelle) -> Manipulate(ginelle, ninette))\n\nManipulate(doralyn, ninette)\n\nBlackwash(doralyn, ginelle) and forall x (Blackwash(x, ginelle) -> Manipulate(x, doralyn)) -> therefore Manipulate(doralyn, doralyn) Manipulate(doralyn, doralyn) and forall x (Manipulate(x, doralyn) -> not Manipulate(doralyn, ninette)) -> therefore not Manipulate(doralyn, ninette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The arther does not like the nichols. The arther jive the jesus. The arther does not see the nichols. The jesus palliate the nichols. The nichols spring the scotty. The scotty is antiphonal. The scotty palliate the arther. If someone palliate the arther then they need the scotty. If someone jive the scotty then the scotty does not need the jesus. If the arther palliate the scotty then the scotty is not jamesian. If someone spring the scotty then they do not see the scotty. If someone spring the arther and the arther jive the scotty then the arther jive the nichols. If the nichols jive the scotty then the scotty does not see the nichols. If someone jive the nichols then the nichols palliate the arther. If someone spring the arther then the arther jive the jesus. The arther does not need the scotty.", "logic": "\nnot Spring(arther, nichols)\nJive(arther, jesus)\nnot Palliate(arther, nichols)\nPalliate(jesus, nichols)\nSpring(nichols, scotty)\nAntiphonal(scotty)\nPalliate(scotty, arther)\nforall x (Palliate(x, arther) -> Jive(x, scotty))\nforall x (Jive(x, scotty) -> not Jive(scotty, jesus))\nPalliate(arther, scotty) -> not Jamesian(scotty)\nforall x (Spring(x, scotty) -> not Palliate(x, scotty))\nforall x (Spring(x, arther) and Jive(arther, scotty) -> Jive(arther, nichols))\nJive(nichols, scotty) -> not Palliate(scotty, nichols)\nforall x (Jive(x, nichols) -> Palliate(nichols, arther))\nforall x (Spring(x, arther) -> Jive(arther, jesus))\n\nnot Jive(arther, scotty)\n\nforall x (Palliate(x, arther) -> Jive(x, scotty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The hilliard does not like the federico. The hilliard weary the jethro. The hilliard does not see the federico. The jethro irradiate the federico. The federico roar the basil. The basil is marvellous. The basil irradiate the hilliard. If someone irradiate the hilliard then they need the basil. If someone weary the basil then the basil does not need the jethro. If the hilliard irradiate the basil then the basil is not brisant. If someone roar the basil then they do not see the basil. If someone roar the hilliard and the hilliard weary the basil then the hilliard weary the federico. If the federico weary the basil then the basil does not see the federico. If someone weary the federico then the federico irradiate the hilliard. If someone roar the hilliard then the hilliard weary the jethro. The federico weary the basil.", "logic": "\nnot Roar(hilliard, federico)\nWeary(hilliard, jethro)\nnot Irradiate(hilliard, federico)\nIrradiate(jethro, federico)\nRoar(federico, basil)\nMarvellous(basil)\nIrradiate(basil, hilliard)\nforall x (Irradiate(x, hilliard) -> Weary(x, basil))\nforall x (Weary(x, basil) -> not Weary(basil, jethro))\nIrradiate(hilliard, basil) -> not Brisant(basil)\nforall x (Roar(x, basil) -> not Irradiate(x, basil))\nforall x (Roar(x, hilliard) and Weary(hilliard, basil) -> Weary(hilliard, federico))\nWeary(federico, basil) -> not Irradiate(basil, federico)\nforall x (Weary(x, federico) -> Irradiate(federico, hilliard))\nforall x (Roar(x, hilliard) -> Weary(hilliard, jethro))\n\nWeary(federico, basil)\n\nforall x (Irradiate(x, hilliard) -> Weary(x, basil)) <- forall x (Weary(x, federico) -> Irradiate(federico, hilliard)) <- forall x (Roar(x, hilliard) and Weary(hilliard, basil) -> Weary(hilliard, federico)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The raynor does not like the eduardo. The raynor incurvate the barbra. The raynor does not see the eduardo. The barbra unfold the eduardo. The eduardo shirt the adoree. The adoree is ordinary. The adoree unfold the raynor. If someone unfold the raynor then they need the adoree. If someone incurvate the adoree then the adoree does not need the barbra. If the raynor unfold the adoree then the adoree is not dextrous. If someone shirt the adoree then they do not see the adoree. If someone shirt the raynor and the raynor incurvate the adoree then the raynor incurvate the eduardo. If the eduardo incurvate the adoree then the adoree does not see the eduardo. If someone incurvate the eduardo then the eduardo unfold the raynor. If someone shirt the raynor then the raynor incurvate the barbra. The barbra does not need the adoree.", "logic": "\nnot Shirt(raynor, eduardo)\nIncurvate(raynor, barbra)\nnot Unfold(raynor, eduardo)\nUnfold(barbra, eduardo)\nShirt(eduardo, adoree)\nOrdinary(adoree)\nUnfold(adoree, raynor)\nforall x (Unfold(x, raynor) -> Incurvate(x, adoree))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, adoree) -> not Incurvate(adoree, barbra))\nUnfold(raynor, adoree) -> not Dextrous(adoree)\nforall x (Shirt(x, adoree) -> not Unfold(x, adoree))\nforall x (Shirt(x, raynor) and Incurvate(raynor, adoree) -> Incurvate(raynor, eduardo))\nIncurvate(eduardo, adoree) -> not Unfold(adoree, eduardo)\nforall x (Incurvate(x, eduardo) -> Unfold(eduardo, raynor))\nforall x (Shirt(x, raynor) -> Incurvate(raynor, barbra))\n\nnot Incurvate(barbra, adoree)\n\nforall x (Unfold(x, raynor) -> Incurvate(x, adoree)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The charla does not like the bunnie. The charla cheat the kanya. The charla does not see the bunnie. The kanya catenulate the bunnie. The bunnie convolute the chrissa. The chrissa is retired. The chrissa catenulate the charla. If someone catenulate the charla then they need the chrissa. If someone cheat the chrissa then the chrissa does not need the kanya. If the charla catenulate the chrissa then the chrissa is not runcinate. If someone convolute the chrissa then they do not see the chrissa. If someone convolute the charla and the charla cheat the chrissa then the charla cheat the bunnie. If the bunnie cheat the chrissa then the chrissa does not see the bunnie. If someone cheat the bunnie then the bunnie catenulate the charla. If someone convolute the charla then the charla cheat the kanya. The charla convolute the chrissa.", "logic": "\nnot Convolute(charla, bunnie)\nCheat(charla, kanya)\nnot Catenulate(charla, bunnie)\nCatenulate(kanya, bunnie)\nConvolute(bunnie, chrissa)\nRetired(chrissa)\nCatenulate(chrissa, charla)\nforall x (Catenulate(x, charla) -> Cheat(x, chrissa))\nforall x (Cheat(x, chrissa) -> not Cheat(chrissa, kanya))\nCatenulate(charla, chrissa) -> not Runcinate(chrissa)\nforall x (Convolute(x, chrissa) -> not Catenulate(x, chrissa))\nforall x (Convolute(x, charla) and Cheat(charla, chrissa) -> Cheat(charla, bunnie))\nCheat(bunnie, chrissa) -> not Catenulate(chrissa, bunnie)\nforall x (Cheat(x, bunnie) -> Catenulate(bunnie, charla))\nforall x (Convolute(x, charla) -> Cheat(charla, kanya))\n\nConvolute(charla, chrissa)\n\nConvolute(charla, chrissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The coleen does not like the amie. The coleen cleave the allah. The coleen does not see the amie. The allah popularise the amie. The amie descale the bessy. The bessy is undoable. The bessy popularise the coleen. If someone popularise the coleen then they need the bessy. If someone cleave the bessy then the bessy does not need the allah. If the coleen popularise the bessy then the bessy is not nuts. If someone descale the bessy then they do not see the bessy. If someone descale the coleen and the coleen cleave the bessy then the coleen cleave the amie. If the amie cleave the bessy then the bessy does not see the amie. If someone cleave the amie then the amie popularise the coleen. If someone descale the coleen then the coleen cleave the allah. The coleen does not like the allah.", "logic": "\nnot Descale(coleen, amie)\nCleave(coleen, allah)\nnot Popularise(coleen, amie)\nPopularise(allah, amie)\nDescale(amie, bessy)\nUndoable(bessy)\nPopularise(bessy, coleen)\nforall x (Popularise(x, coleen) -> Cleave(x, bessy))\nforall x (Cleave(x, bessy) -> not Cleave(bessy, allah))\nPopularise(coleen, bessy) -> not Nuts(bessy)\nforall x (Descale(x, bessy) -> not Popularise(x, bessy))\nforall x (Descale(x, coleen) and Cleave(coleen, bessy) -> Cleave(coleen, amie))\nCleave(amie, bessy) -> not Popularise(bessy, amie)\nforall x (Cleave(x, amie) -> Popularise(amie, coleen))\nforall x (Descale(x, coleen) -> Cleave(coleen, allah))\n\nnot Descale(coleen, allah)\n\nnot Descale(coleen, allah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "The olivie does not like the tobit. The olivie demise the alayne. The olivie does not see the tobit. The alayne terrace the tobit. The tobit misquote the gunilla. The gunilla is mismatched. The gunilla terrace the olivie. If someone terrace the olivie then they need the gunilla. If someone demise the gunilla then the gunilla does not need the alayne. If the olivie terrace the gunilla then the gunilla is not monotonous. If someone misquote the gunilla then they do not see the gunilla. If someone misquote the olivie and the olivie demise the gunilla then the olivie demise the tobit. If the tobit demise the gunilla then the gunilla does not see the tobit. If someone demise the tobit then the tobit terrace the olivie. If someone misquote the olivie then the olivie demise the alayne. The tobit demise the alayne.", "logic": "\nnot Misquote(olivie, tobit)\nDemise(olivie, alayne)\nnot Terrace(olivie, tobit)\nTerrace(alayne, tobit)\nMisquote(tobit, gunilla)\nMismatched(gunilla)\nTerrace(gunilla, olivie)\nforall x (Terrace(x, olivie) -> Demise(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Demise(x, gunilla) -> not Demise(gunilla, alayne))\nTerrace(olivie, gunilla) -> not Monotonous(gunilla)\nforall x (Misquote(x, gunilla) -> not Terrace(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Misquote(x, olivie) and Demise(olivie, gunilla) -> Demise(olivie, tobit))\nDemise(tobit, gunilla) -> not Terrace(gunilla, tobit)\nforall x (Demise(x, tobit) -> Terrace(tobit, olivie))\nforall x (Misquote(x, olivie) -> Demise(olivie, alayne))\n\nDemise(tobit, alayne)\n\nDemise(tobit, alayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1885"} {"premises": "Gipsy is not tubed. Tiffie is faustian. Waylin is occupied. Tomi is gnostic. If someone is faustian then they are occupied. Cold people are lowbrowed. If someone is tubed and not lowbrowed then they are junoesque. All faustian people are not junoesque. If Gipsy is junoesque and Gipsy is lowbrowed then Gipsy is ethereal. If someone is ethereal and not junoesque then they are not gnostic. Kind people are gnostic. If someone is junoesque then they are gnostic. Waylin is occupied.", "logic": "\nnot Tubed(gipsy)\nFaustian(tiffie)\nOccupied(waylin)\nGnostic(tomi)\nforall x (Faustian(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Lowbrowed(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) and not Lowbrowed(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Faustian(x) -> not Junoesque(x))\nJunoesque(gipsy) and Lowbrowed(gipsy) -> Ethereal(gipsy)\nforall x (Ethereal(x) and not Junoesque(x) -> not Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Gnostic(x))\n\nOccupied(waylin)\n\ntherefore Occupied(waylin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Sheilah is not sensitized. Aubree is upset. Romola is betrothed. Cariotta is bonkers. If someone is upset then they are betrothed. Cold people are caucasic. If someone is sensitized and not caucasic then they are perky. All upset people are not perky. If Sheilah is perky and Sheilah is caucasic then Sheilah is extant. If someone is extant and not perky then they are not bonkers. Kind people are bonkers. If someone is perky then they are bonkers. Cariotta is not bonkers.", "logic": "\nnot Sensitized(sheilah)\nUpset(aubree)\nBetrothed(romola)\nBonkers(cariotta)\nforall x (Upset(x) -> Betrothed(x))\nforall x (Sensitized(x) -> Caucasic(x))\nforall x (Sensitized(x) and not Caucasic(x) -> Perky(x))\nforall x (Upset(x) -> not Perky(x))\nPerky(sheilah) and Caucasic(sheilah) -> Extant(sheilah)\nforall x (Extant(x) and not Perky(x) -> not Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Perky(x) -> Bonkers(x))\n\nnot Bonkers(cariotta)\n\ntherefore Bonkers(cariotta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Korney is not reserved. Bjorn is flocculent. Bertrand is cragfast. Nicole is scaley. If someone is flocculent then they are cragfast. Cold people are spouting. If someone is reserved and not spouting then they are ungoverned. All flocculent people are not ungoverned. If Korney is ungoverned and Korney is spouting then Korney is scaleless. If someone is scaleless and not ungoverned then they are not scaley. Kind people are scaley. If someone is ungoverned then they are scaley. Bertrand is scaley.", "logic": "\nnot Reserved(korney)\nFlocculent(bjorn)\nCragfast(bertrand)\nScaley(nicole)\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Reserved(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Reserved(x) and not Spouting(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> not Ungoverned(x))\nUngoverned(korney) and Spouting(korney) -> Scaleless(korney)\nforall x (Scaleless(x) and not Ungoverned(x) -> not Scaley(x))\nforall x (Cragfast(x) -> Scaley(x))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Scaley(x))\n\nScaley(bertrand)\n\nCragfast(bertrand) and forall x (Cragfast(x) -> Scaley(x)) -> therefore Scaley(bertrand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Laurette is not vascular. Harmonia is amaurotic. Turner is skim. Casi is puzzled. If someone is amaurotic then they are skim. Cold people are raisable. If someone is vascular and not raisable then they are steadied. All amaurotic people are not steadied. If Laurette is steadied and Laurette is raisable then Laurette is pejorative. If someone is pejorative and not steadied then they are not puzzled. Kind people are puzzled. If someone is steadied then they are puzzled. Turner is not puzzled.", "logic": "\nnot Vascular(laurette)\nAmaurotic(harmonia)\nSkim(turner)\nPuzzled(casi)\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) -> Skim(x))\nforall x (Vascular(x) -> Raisable(x))\nforall x (Vascular(x) and not Raisable(x) -> Steadied(x))\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) -> not Steadied(x))\nSteadied(laurette) and Raisable(laurette) -> Pejorative(laurette)\nforall x (Pejorative(x) and not Steadied(x) -> not Puzzled(x))\nforall x (Skim(x) -> Puzzled(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Puzzled(x))\n\nnot Puzzled(turner)\n\nSkim(turner) and forall x (Skim(x) -> Puzzled(x)) -> therefore Puzzled(turner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Wheeler is not milch. Eloise is antennary. Gilda is rhizoidal. Lissi is olfactive. If someone is antennary then they are rhizoidal. Cold people are javanese. If someone is milch and not javanese then they are baptistic. All antennary people are not baptistic. If Wheeler is baptistic and Wheeler is javanese then Wheeler is crowded. If someone is crowded and not baptistic then they are not olfactive. Kind people are olfactive. If someone is baptistic then they are olfactive. Eloise is olfactive.", "logic": "\nnot Milch(wheeler)\nAntennary(eloise)\nRhizoidal(gilda)\nOlfactive(lissi)\nforall x (Antennary(x) -> Rhizoidal(x))\nforall x (Milch(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Milch(x) and not Javanese(x) -> Baptistic(x))\nforall x (Antennary(x) -> not Baptistic(x))\nBaptistic(wheeler) and Javanese(wheeler) -> Crowded(wheeler)\nforall x (Crowded(x) and not Baptistic(x) -> not Olfactive(x))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Olfactive(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) -> Olfactive(x))\n\nOlfactive(eloise)\n\nAntennary(eloise) and forall x (Antennary(x) -> Rhizoidal(x)) -> therefore Rhizoidal(eloise) Rhizoidal(eloise) and forall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Olfactive(x)) -> therefore Olfactive(eloise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Neil is not inside. Pamella is squinched. Mela is glittering. Jakob is unnerving. If someone is squinched then they are glittering. Cold people are malignant. If someone is inside and not malignant then they are undersized. All squinched people are not undersized. If Neil is undersized and Neil is malignant then Neil is evaporable. If someone is evaporable and not undersized then they are not unnerving. Kind people are unnerving. If someone is undersized then they are unnerving. Pamella is not unnerving.", "logic": "\nnot Inside(neil)\nSquinched(pamella)\nGlittering(mela)\nUnnerving(jakob)\nforall x (Squinched(x) -> Glittering(x))\nforall x (Inside(x) -> Malignant(x))\nforall x (Inside(x) and not Malignant(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) -> not Undersized(x))\nUndersized(neil) and Malignant(neil) -> Evaporable(neil)\nforall x (Evaporable(x) and not Undersized(x) -> not Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Unnerving(x))\n\nnot Unnerving(pamella)\n\nSquinched(pamella) and forall x (Squinched(x) -> Glittering(x)) -> therefore Glittering(pamella) Glittering(pamella) and forall x (Glittering(x) -> Unnerving(x)) -> therefore Unnerving(pamella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Iolande is not squinched. Alphonse is regenerate. Deva is travelable. Gustave is transpolar. If someone is regenerate then they are travelable. Cold people are backward. If someone is squinched and not backward then they are creole. All regenerate people are not creole. If Iolande is creole and Iolande is backward then Iolande is refractile. If someone is refractile and not creole then they are not transpolar. Kind people are transpolar. If someone is creole then they are transpolar. Gustave is not creole.", "logic": "\nnot Squinched(iolande)\nRegenerate(alphonse)\nTravelable(deva)\nTranspolar(gustave)\nforall x (Regenerate(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) and not Backward(x) -> Creole(x))\nforall x (Regenerate(x) -> not Creole(x))\nCreole(iolande) and Backward(iolande) -> Refractile(iolande)\nforall x (Refractile(x) and not Creole(x) -> not Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Travelable(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Creole(x) -> Transpolar(x))\n\nnot Creole(gustave)\n\nforall x (Squinched(x) and not Backward(x) -> Creole(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Callida is not spiderly. Berti is airless. Bevvy is calyculate. Kathleen is fond. If someone is airless then they are calyculate. Cold people are concessive. If someone is spiderly and not concessive then they are rhythmical. All airless people are not rhythmical. If Callida is rhythmical and Callida is concessive then Callida is thracian. If someone is thracian and not rhythmical then they are not fond. Kind people are fond. If someone is rhythmical then they are fond. Kathleen is concessive.", "logic": "\nnot Spiderly(callida)\nAirless(berti)\nCalyculate(bevvy)\nFond(kathleen)\nforall x (Airless(x) -> Calyculate(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) and not Concessive(x) -> Rhythmical(x))\nforall x (Airless(x) -> not Rhythmical(x))\nRhythmical(callida) and Concessive(callida) -> Thracian(callida)\nforall x (Thracian(x) and not Rhythmical(x) -> not Fond(x))\nforall x (Calyculate(x) -> Fond(x))\nforall x (Rhythmical(x) -> Fond(x))\n\nConcessive(kathleen)\n\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Concessive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Timmi is not mandibular. Felicio is mouldy. Ulrich is yummy. Wells is auxiliary. If someone is mouldy then they are yummy. Cold people are bisexual. If someone is mandibular and not bisexual then they are cambrian. All mouldy people are not cambrian. If Timmi is cambrian and Timmi is bisexual then Timmi is loamless. If someone is loamless and not cambrian then they are not auxiliary. Kind people are auxiliary. If someone is cambrian then they are auxiliary. Wells is not yummy.", "logic": "\nnot Mandibular(timmi)\nMouldy(felicio)\nYummy(ulrich)\nAuxiliary(wells)\nforall x (Mouldy(x) -> Yummy(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Bisexual(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) and not Bisexual(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Mouldy(x) -> not Cambrian(x))\nCambrian(timmi) and Bisexual(timmi) -> Loamless(timmi)\nforall x (Loamless(x) and not Cambrian(x) -> not Auxiliary(x))\nforall x (Yummy(x) -> Auxiliary(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) -> Auxiliary(x))\n\nnot Yummy(wells)\n\nforall x (Mouldy(x) -> Yummy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Aubree is not frayed. Evan is unlawful. Keenan is styleless. Ilene is undesiring. If someone is unlawful then they are styleless. Cold people are scraggy. If someone is frayed and not scraggy then they are tiring. All unlawful people are not tiring. If Aubree is tiring and Aubree is scraggy then Aubree is lossless. If someone is lossless and not tiring then they are not undesiring. Kind people are undesiring. If someone is tiring then they are undesiring. Ilene is lossless.", "logic": "\nnot Frayed(aubree)\nUnlawful(evan)\nStyleless(keenan)\nUndesiring(ilene)\nforall x (Unlawful(x) -> Styleless(x))\nforall x (Frayed(x) -> Scraggy(x))\nforall x (Frayed(x) and not Scraggy(x) -> Tiring(x))\nforall x (Unlawful(x) -> not Tiring(x))\nTiring(aubree) and Scraggy(aubree) -> Lossless(aubree)\nforall x (Lossless(x) and not Tiring(x) -> not Undesiring(x))\nforall x (Styleless(x) -> Undesiring(x))\nforall x (Tiring(x) -> Undesiring(x))\n\nLossless(ilene)\n\nLossless(ilene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Demetrius is not engraved. Nero is haggard. Dickie is chalybeate. Winthrop is cloddish. If someone is haggard then they are chalybeate. Cold people are spherical. If someone is engraved and not spherical then they are cochlear. All haggard people are not cochlear. If Demetrius is cochlear and Demetrius is spherical then Demetrius is placative. If someone is placative and not cochlear then they are not cloddish. Kind people are cloddish. If someone is cochlear then they are cloddish. Nero is not engraved.", "logic": "\nnot Engraved(demetrius)\nHaggard(nero)\nChalybeate(dickie)\nCloddish(winthrop)\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) and not Spherical(x) -> Cochlear(x))\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> not Cochlear(x))\nCochlear(demetrius) and Spherical(demetrius) -> Placative(demetrius)\nforall x (Placative(x) and not Cochlear(x) -> not Cloddish(x))\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) -> Cloddish(x))\nforall x (Cochlear(x) -> Cloddish(x))\n\nnot Engraved(nero)\n\nnot Engraved(nero) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "Betta is not bacteroid. Ronen is overt. Endora is chimeric. Reggy is disarming. If someone is overt then they are chimeric. Cold people are anticancer. If someone is bacteroid and not anticancer then they are marshy. All overt people are not marshy. If Betta is marshy and Betta is anticancer then Betta is sphingine. If someone is sphingine and not marshy then they are not disarming. Kind people are disarming. If someone is marshy then they are disarming. Betta is overt.", "logic": "\nnot Bacteroid(betta)\nOvert(ronen)\nChimeric(endora)\nDisarming(reggy)\nforall x (Overt(x) -> Chimeric(x))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Anticancer(x))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) and not Anticancer(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Overt(x) -> not Marshy(x))\nMarshy(betta) and Anticancer(betta) -> Sphingine(betta)\nforall x (Sphingine(x) and not Marshy(x) -> not Disarming(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Disarming(x))\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Disarming(x))\n\nOvert(betta)\n\nOvert(betta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-26"} {"premises": "The gayla is vulnerable. The dolli mismate the gayla. If the dolli approach the gayla and the dolli descry the gayla then the dolli is gowned. If the gayla mismate the dolli then the dolli is gowned. If the gayla is vulnerable then the gayla mismate the dolli. If something mismate the gayla then it does not visit the dolli. If the dolli is vulnerable then the dolli mismate the gayla. If something mismate the gayla and the gayla mismate the dolli then the dolli is vulnerable. If the gayla mismate the dolli then the gayla is salubrious. If something is salubrious then it is gowned. The dolli mismate the gayla.", "logic": "\nVulnerable(gayla)\nMismate(dolli, gayla)\nApproach(dolli, gayla) and Descry(dolli, gayla) -> Gowned(dolli)\nMismate(gayla, dolli) -> Gowned(dolli)\nVulnerable(gayla) -> Mismate(gayla, dolli)\nforall x (Mismate(x, gayla) -> not Mismate(x, dolli))\nVulnerable(dolli) -> Mismate(dolli, gayla)\nforall x (Mismate(x, gayla) and Mismate(gayla, dolli) -> Vulnerable(dolli))\nMismate(gayla, dolli) -> Salubrious(gayla)\nforall x (Salubrious(x) -> Gowned(x))\n\nMismate(dolli, gayla)\n\ntherefore Mismate(dolli, gayla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The dani is beetle. The shayne reposition the dani. If the shayne deflect the dani and the shayne reorder the dani then the shayne is darwinian. If the dani reposition the shayne then the shayne is darwinian. If the dani is beetle then the dani reposition the shayne. If something reposition the dani then it does not visit the shayne. If the shayne is beetle then the shayne reposition the dani. If something reposition the dani and the dani reposition the shayne then the shayne is beetle. If the dani reposition the shayne then the dani is algophobic. If something is algophobic then it is darwinian. The dani is not beetle.", "logic": "\nBeetle(dani)\nReposition(shayne, dani)\nDeflect(shayne, dani) and Reorder(shayne, dani) -> Darwinian(shayne)\nReposition(dani, shayne) -> Darwinian(shayne)\nBeetle(dani) -> Reposition(dani, shayne)\nforall x (Reposition(x, dani) -> not Reposition(x, shayne))\nBeetle(shayne) -> Reposition(shayne, dani)\nforall x (Reposition(x, dani) and Reposition(dani, shayne) -> Beetle(shayne))\nReposition(dani, shayne) -> Algophobic(dani)\nforall x (Algophobic(x) -> Darwinian(x))\n\nnot Beetle(dani)\n\ntherefore Beetle(dani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The natalie is prox. The anjanette mimic the natalie. If the anjanette snarf the natalie and the anjanette declaim the natalie then the anjanette is raring. If the natalie mimic the anjanette then the anjanette is raring. If the natalie is prox then the natalie mimic the anjanette. If something mimic the natalie then it does not visit the anjanette. If the anjanette is prox then the anjanette mimic the natalie. If something mimic the natalie and the natalie mimic the anjanette then the anjanette is prox. If the natalie mimic the anjanette then the natalie is congruous. If something is congruous then it is raring. The anjanette does not visit the anjanette.", "logic": "\nProx(natalie)\nMimic(anjanette, natalie)\nSnarf(anjanette, natalie) and Declaim(anjanette, natalie) -> Raring(anjanette)\nMimic(natalie, anjanette) -> Raring(anjanette)\nProx(natalie) -> Mimic(natalie, anjanette)\nforall x (Mimic(x, natalie) -> not Mimic(x, anjanette))\nProx(anjanette) -> Mimic(anjanette, natalie)\nforall x (Mimic(x, natalie) and Mimic(natalie, anjanette) -> Prox(anjanette))\nMimic(natalie, anjanette) -> Congruous(natalie)\nforall x (Congruous(x) -> Raring(x))\n\nnot Mimic(anjanette, anjanette)\n\nMimic(anjanette, natalie) and forall x (Mimic(x, natalie) -> not Mimic(x, anjanette)) -> therefore not Mimic(anjanette, anjanette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The jeri is penciled. The lelah sponge the jeri. If the lelah illuminate the jeri and the lelah scrawl the jeri then the lelah is unadorned. If the jeri sponge the lelah then the lelah is unadorned. If the jeri is penciled then the jeri sponge the lelah. If something sponge the jeri then it does not visit the lelah. If the lelah is penciled then the lelah sponge the jeri. If something sponge the jeri and the jeri sponge the lelah then the lelah is penciled. If the jeri sponge the lelah then the jeri is infectious. If something is infectious then it is unadorned. The lelah sponge the lelah.", "logic": "\nPenciled(jeri)\nSponge(lelah, jeri)\nIlluminate(lelah, jeri) and Scrawl(lelah, jeri) -> Unadorned(lelah)\nSponge(jeri, lelah) -> Unadorned(lelah)\nPenciled(jeri) -> Sponge(jeri, lelah)\nforall x (Sponge(x, jeri) -> not Sponge(x, lelah))\nPenciled(lelah) -> Sponge(lelah, jeri)\nforall x (Sponge(x, jeri) and Sponge(jeri, lelah) -> Penciled(lelah))\nSponge(jeri, lelah) -> Infectious(jeri)\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Unadorned(x))\n\nSponge(lelah, lelah)\n\nSponge(lelah, jeri) and forall x (Sponge(x, jeri) -> not Sponge(x, lelah)) -> therefore not Sponge(lelah, lelah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The ryan is astute. The garfield rearm the ryan. If the garfield tailor the ryan and the garfield bedaub the ryan then the garfield is unmarked. If the ryan rearm the garfield then the garfield is unmarked. If the ryan is astute then the ryan rearm the garfield. If something rearm the ryan then it does not visit the garfield. If the garfield is astute then the garfield rearm the ryan. If something rearm the ryan and the ryan rearm the garfield then the garfield is astute. If the ryan rearm the garfield then the ryan is sniffy. If something is sniffy then it is unmarked. The garfield is unmarked.", "logic": "\nAstute(ryan)\nRearm(garfield, ryan)\nTailor(garfield, ryan) and Bedaub(garfield, ryan) -> Unmarked(garfield)\nRearm(ryan, garfield) -> Unmarked(garfield)\nAstute(ryan) -> Rearm(ryan, garfield)\nforall x (Rearm(x, ryan) -> not Rearm(x, garfield))\nAstute(garfield) -> Rearm(garfield, ryan)\nforall x (Rearm(x, ryan) and Rearm(ryan, garfield) -> Astute(garfield))\nRearm(ryan, garfield) -> Sniffy(ryan)\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Unmarked(x))\n\nUnmarked(garfield)\n\nAstute(ryan) and Astute(ryan) -> Rearm(ryan, garfield) -> therefore Rearm(ryan, garfield) Rearm(ryan, garfield) and Rearm(ryan, garfield) -> Unmarked(garfield) -> therefore Unmarked(garfield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The renie is estranging. The juan barbeque the renie. If the juan accrete the renie and the juan sulfate the renie then the juan is fooling. If the renie barbeque the juan then the juan is fooling. If the renie is estranging then the renie barbeque the juan. If something barbeque the renie then it does not visit the juan. If the juan is estranging then the juan barbeque the renie. If something barbeque the renie and the renie barbeque the juan then the juan is estranging. If the renie barbeque the juan then the renie is artful. If something is artful then it is fooling. The renie is not artful.", "logic": "\nEstranging(renie)\nBarbeque(juan, renie)\nAccrete(juan, renie) and Sulfate(juan, renie) -> Fooling(juan)\nBarbeque(renie, juan) -> Fooling(juan)\nEstranging(renie) -> Barbeque(renie, juan)\nforall x (Barbeque(x, renie) -> not Barbeque(x, juan))\nEstranging(juan) -> Barbeque(juan, renie)\nforall x (Barbeque(x, renie) and Barbeque(renie, juan) -> Estranging(juan))\nBarbeque(renie, juan) -> Artful(renie)\nforall x (Artful(x) -> Fooling(x))\n\nnot Artful(renie)\n\nEstranging(renie) and Estranging(renie) -> Barbeque(renie, juan) -> therefore Barbeque(renie, juan) Barbeque(renie, juan) and Barbeque(renie, juan) -> Artful(renie) -> therefore Artful(renie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The ira is wounded. The giorgia syllogize the ira. If the giorgia exhume the ira and the giorgia latinise the ira then the giorgia is greenhouse. If the ira syllogize the giorgia then the giorgia is greenhouse. If the ira is wounded then the ira syllogize the giorgia. If something syllogize the ira then it does not visit the giorgia. If the giorgia is wounded then the giorgia syllogize the ira. If something syllogize the ira and the ira syllogize the giorgia then the giorgia is wounded. If the ira syllogize the giorgia then the ira is sericeous. If something is sericeous then it is greenhouse. The giorgia does not eat the giorgia.", "logic": "\nWounded(ira)\nSyllogize(giorgia, ira)\nExhume(giorgia, ira) and Latinise(giorgia, ira) -> Greenhouse(giorgia)\nSyllogize(ira, giorgia) -> Greenhouse(giorgia)\nWounded(ira) -> Syllogize(ira, giorgia)\nforall x (Syllogize(x, ira) -> not Syllogize(x, giorgia))\nWounded(giorgia) -> Syllogize(giorgia, ira)\nforall x (Syllogize(x, ira) and Syllogize(ira, giorgia) -> Wounded(giorgia))\nSyllogize(ira, giorgia) -> Sericeous(ira)\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Greenhouse(x))\n\nnot Latinise(giorgia, giorgia)\n\nnot Latinise(giorgia, giorgia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The laina is gloomful. The aharon place the laina. If the aharon extradite the laina and the aharon undergo the laina then the aharon is haemic. If the laina place the aharon then the aharon is haemic. If the laina is gloomful then the laina place the aharon. If something place the laina then it does not visit the aharon. If the aharon is gloomful then the aharon place the laina. If something place the laina and the laina place the aharon then the aharon is gloomful. If the laina place the aharon then the laina is starlike. If something is starlike then it is haemic. The aharon extradite the aharon.", "logic": "\nGloomful(laina)\nPlace(aharon, laina)\nExtradite(aharon, laina) and Undergo(aharon, laina) -> Haemic(aharon)\nPlace(laina, aharon) -> Haemic(aharon)\nGloomful(laina) -> Place(laina, aharon)\nforall x (Place(x, laina) -> not Place(x, aharon))\nGloomful(aharon) -> Place(aharon, laina)\nforall x (Place(x, laina) and Place(laina, aharon) -> Gloomful(aharon))\nPlace(laina, aharon) -> Starlike(laina)\nforall x (Starlike(x) -> Haemic(x))\n\nExtradite(aharon, aharon)\n\nExtradite(aharon, aharon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The eran is pressed. The patrice roar the eran. If the patrice accoutre the eran and the patrice chiromance the eran then the patrice is boytrose. If the eran roar the patrice then the patrice is boytrose. If the eran is pressed then the eran roar the patrice. If something roar the eran then it does not visit the patrice. If the patrice is pressed then the patrice roar the eran. If something roar the eran and the eran roar the patrice then the patrice is pressed. If the eran roar the patrice then the eran is tympanic. If something is tympanic then it is boytrose. The patrice does not see the eran.", "logic": "\nPressed(eran)\nRoar(patrice, eran)\nAccoutre(patrice, eran) and Chiromance(patrice, eran) -> Boytrose(patrice)\nRoar(eran, patrice) -> Boytrose(patrice)\nPressed(eran) -> Roar(eran, patrice)\nforall x (Roar(x, eran) -> not Roar(x, patrice))\nPressed(patrice) -> Roar(patrice, eran)\nforall x (Roar(x, eran) and Roar(eran, patrice) -> Pressed(patrice))\nRoar(eran, patrice) -> Tympanic(eran)\nforall x (Tympanic(x) -> Boytrose(x))\n\nnot Accoutre(patrice, eran)\n\nnot Accoutre(patrice, eran) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The flin is famed. The lance exhort the flin. If the lance paper the flin and the lance depolarise the flin then the lance is imbalanced. If the flin exhort the lance then the lance is imbalanced. If the flin is famed then the flin exhort the lance. If something exhort the flin then it does not visit the lance. If the lance is famed then the lance exhort the flin. If something exhort the flin and the flin exhort the lance then the lance is famed. If the flin exhort the lance then the flin is unabated. If something is unabated then it is imbalanced. The lance is young.", "logic": "\nFamed(flin)\nExhort(lance, flin)\nPaper(lance, flin) and Depolarise(lance, flin) -> Imbalanced(lance)\nExhort(flin, lance) -> Imbalanced(lance)\nFamed(flin) -> Exhort(flin, lance)\nforall x (Exhort(x, flin) -> not Exhort(x, lance))\nFamed(lance) -> Exhort(lance, flin)\nforall x (Exhort(x, flin) and Exhort(flin, lance) -> Famed(lance))\nExhort(flin, lance) -> Unabated(flin)\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> Imbalanced(x))\n\nYoung(lance)\n\nYoung(lance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The stefano is bibliotic. The orel uphold the stefano. If the orel tremor the stefano and the orel privilege the stefano then the orel is bracteal. If the stefano uphold the orel then the orel is bracteal. If the stefano is bibliotic then the stefano uphold the orel. If something uphold the stefano then it does not visit the orel. If the orel is bibliotic then the orel uphold the stefano. If something uphold the stefano and the stefano uphold the orel then the orel is bibliotic. If the stefano uphold the orel then the stefano is american. If something is american then it is bracteal. The orel does not eat the stefano.", "logic": "\nBibliotic(stefano)\nUphold(orel, stefano)\nTremor(orel, stefano) and Privilege(orel, stefano) -> Bracteal(orel)\nUphold(stefano, orel) -> Bracteal(orel)\nBibliotic(stefano) -> Uphold(stefano, orel)\nforall x (Uphold(x, stefano) -> not Uphold(x, orel))\nBibliotic(orel) -> Uphold(orel, stefano)\nforall x (Uphold(x, stefano) and Uphold(stefano, orel) -> Bibliotic(orel))\nUphold(stefano, orel) -> American(stefano)\nforall x (American(x) -> Bracteal(x))\n\nnot Privilege(orel, stefano)\n\nnot Privilege(orel, stefano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "The agnella is hind. The halley misdirect the agnella. If the halley hoover the agnella and the halley practise the agnella then the halley is blunted. If the agnella misdirect the halley then the halley is blunted. If the agnella is hind then the agnella misdirect the halley. If something misdirect the agnella then it does not visit the halley. If the halley is hind then the halley misdirect the agnella. If something misdirect the agnella and the agnella misdirect the halley then the halley is hind. If the agnella misdirect the halley then the agnella is included. If something is included then it is blunted. The agnella is nice.", "logic": "\nHind(agnella)\nMisdirect(halley, agnella)\nHoover(halley, agnella) and Practise(halley, agnella) -> Blunted(halley)\nMisdirect(agnella, halley) -> Blunted(halley)\nHind(agnella) -> Misdirect(agnella, halley)\nforall x (Misdirect(x, agnella) -> not Misdirect(x, halley))\nHind(halley) -> Misdirect(halley, agnella)\nforall x (Misdirect(x, agnella) and Misdirect(agnella, halley) -> Hind(halley))\nMisdirect(agnella, halley) -> Included(agnella)\nforall x (Included(x) -> Blunted(x))\n\nNice(agnella)\n\nNice(agnella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1077"} {"premises": "Hortensia is inculpable. Hortensia is auriculate. Hortensia is gnomic. Hortensia is busted. Hortensia is catching. Leland is both. Leland is auriculate. Leland is not busted. Leland is catching. Gizela is inculpable. Gizela is auriculate. Gizela is downstair. Gizela is catching. Clareta is auriculate. Clareta is busted. If Hortensia is downstair and Hortensia is gnomic then Hortensia is auriculate. White things are inculpable. If Clareta is downstair and Clareta is catching then Clareta is both. All inculpable things are gnomic. If Hortensia is gnomic and Hortensia is inculpable then Hortensia is both. Blue things are downstair. Gizela is catching.", "logic": "\nInculpable(hortensia)\nAuriculate(hortensia)\nGnomic(hortensia)\nBusted(hortensia)\nCatching(hortensia)\nBoth(leland)\nAuriculate(leland)\nnot Busted(leland)\nCatching(leland)\nInculpable(gizela)\nAuriculate(gizela)\nDownstair(gizela)\nCatching(gizela)\nAuriculate(clareta)\nBusted(clareta)\nDownstair(hortensia) and Gnomic(hortensia) -> Auriculate(hortensia)\nforall x (Busted(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nDownstair(clareta) and Catching(clareta) -> Both(clareta)\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> Gnomic(x))\nGnomic(hortensia) and Inculpable(hortensia) -> Both(hortensia)\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> Downstair(x))\n\nCatching(gizela)\n\ntherefore Catching(gizela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Ellynn is upland. Ellynn is drowsing. Ellynn is straining. Ellynn is much. Ellynn is unheeding. Gilberte is unpermed. Gilberte is drowsing. Gilberte is not much. Gilberte is unheeding. Dionis is upland. Dionis is drowsing. Dionis is astomatal. Dionis is unheeding. Sanders is drowsing. Sanders is much. If Ellynn is astomatal and Ellynn is straining then Ellynn is drowsing. White things are upland. If Sanders is astomatal and Sanders is unheeding then Sanders is unpermed. All upland things are straining. If Ellynn is straining and Ellynn is upland then Ellynn is unpermed. Blue things are astomatal. Dionis is not astomatal.", "logic": "\nUpland(ellynn)\nDrowsing(ellynn)\nStraining(ellynn)\nMuch(ellynn)\nUnheeding(ellynn)\nUnpermed(gilberte)\nDrowsing(gilberte)\nnot Much(gilberte)\nUnheeding(gilberte)\nUpland(dionis)\nDrowsing(dionis)\nAstomatal(dionis)\nUnheeding(dionis)\nDrowsing(sanders)\nMuch(sanders)\nAstomatal(ellynn) and Straining(ellynn) -> Drowsing(ellynn)\nforall x (Much(x) -> Upland(x))\nAstomatal(sanders) and Unheeding(sanders) -> Unpermed(sanders)\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Straining(x))\nStraining(ellynn) and Upland(ellynn) -> Unpermed(ellynn)\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Astomatal(x))\n\nnot Astomatal(dionis)\n\ntherefore Astomatal(dionis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Rubi is uplifted. Rubi is tumultuous. Rubi is antepartum. Rubi is lunate. Rubi is cyanophyte. Neddie is residual. Neddie is tumultuous. Neddie is not lunate. Neddie is cyanophyte. Fredra is uplifted. Fredra is tumultuous. Fredra is genetic. Fredra is cyanophyte. Beverly is tumultuous. Beverly is lunate. If Rubi is genetic and Rubi is antepartum then Rubi is tumultuous. White things are uplifted. If Beverly is genetic and Beverly is cyanophyte then Beverly is residual. All uplifted things are antepartum. If Rubi is antepartum and Rubi is uplifted then Rubi is residual. Blue things are genetic. Fredra is antepartum.", "logic": "\nUplifted(rubi)\nTumultuous(rubi)\nAntepartum(rubi)\nLunate(rubi)\nCyanophyte(rubi)\nResidual(neddie)\nTumultuous(neddie)\nnot Lunate(neddie)\nCyanophyte(neddie)\nUplifted(fredra)\nTumultuous(fredra)\nGenetic(fredra)\nCyanophyte(fredra)\nTumultuous(beverly)\nLunate(beverly)\nGenetic(rubi) and Antepartum(rubi) -> Tumultuous(rubi)\nforall x (Lunate(x) -> Uplifted(x))\nGenetic(beverly) and Cyanophyte(beverly) -> Residual(beverly)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nAntepartum(rubi) and Uplifted(rubi) -> Residual(rubi)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) -> Genetic(x))\n\nAntepartum(fredra)\n\nUplifted(fredra) and forall x (Uplifted(x) -> Antepartum(x)) -> therefore Antepartum(fredra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Tamas is wooden. Tamas is nephritic. Tamas is velar. Tamas is brimless. Tamas is weighted. Beatrice is fogbound. Beatrice is nephritic. Beatrice is not brimless. Beatrice is weighted. Marj is wooden. Marj is nephritic. Marj is biloculate. Marj is weighted. Romona is nephritic. Romona is brimless. If Tamas is biloculate and Tamas is velar then Tamas is nephritic. White things are wooden. If Romona is biloculate and Romona is weighted then Romona is fogbound. All wooden things are velar. If Tamas is velar and Tamas is wooden then Tamas is fogbound. Blue things are biloculate. Tamas is not fogbound.", "logic": "\nWooden(tamas)\nNephritic(tamas)\nVelar(tamas)\nBrimless(tamas)\nWeighted(tamas)\nFogbound(beatrice)\nNephritic(beatrice)\nnot Brimless(beatrice)\nWeighted(beatrice)\nWooden(marj)\nNephritic(marj)\nBiloculate(marj)\nWeighted(marj)\nNephritic(romona)\nBrimless(romona)\nBiloculate(tamas) and Velar(tamas) -> Nephritic(tamas)\nforall x (Brimless(x) -> Wooden(x))\nBiloculate(romona) and Weighted(romona) -> Fogbound(romona)\nforall x (Wooden(x) -> Velar(x))\nVelar(tamas) and Wooden(tamas) -> Fogbound(tamas)\nforall x (Wooden(x) -> Biloculate(x))\n\nnot Fogbound(tamas)\n\nVelar(tamas) and Wooden(tamas) and Velar(tamas) and Wooden(tamas) -> Fogbound(tamas) -> therefore Fogbound(tamas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Issi is spineless. Issi is footsure. Issi is uncaused. Issi is savourless. Issi is spheroidal. Kate is columned. Kate is footsure. Kate is not savourless. Kate is spheroidal. Lucila is spineless. Lucila is footsure. Lucila is cankerous. Lucila is spheroidal. Penn is footsure. Penn is savourless. If Issi is cankerous and Issi is uncaused then Issi is footsure. White things are spineless. If Penn is cankerous and Penn is spheroidal then Penn is columned. All spineless things are uncaused. If Issi is uncaused and Issi is spineless then Issi is columned. Blue things are cankerous. Penn is uncaused.", "logic": "\nSpineless(issi)\nFootsure(issi)\nUncaused(issi)\nSavourless(issi)\nSpheroidal(issi)\nColumned(kate)\nFootsure(kate)\nnot Savourless(kate)\nSpheroidal(kate)\nSpineless(lucila)\nFootsure(lucila)\nCankerous(lucila)\nSpheroidal(lucila)\nFootsure(penn)\nSavourless(penn)\nCankerous(issi) and Uncaused(issi) -> Footsure(issi)\nforall x (Savourless(x) -> Spineless(x))\nCankerous(penn) and Spheroidal(penn) -> Columned(penn)\nforall x (Spineless(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nUncaused(issi) and Spineless(issi) -> Columned(issi)\nforall x (Spineless(x) -> Cankerous(x))\n\nUncaused(penn)\n\nSavourless(penn) and forall x (Savourless(x) -> Spineless(x)) -> therefore Spineless(penn) Spineless(penn) and forall x (Spineless(x) -> Uncaused(x)) -> therefore Uncaused(penn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Jeanette is stellate. Jeanette is accessible. Jeanette is woody. Jeanette is gloved. Jeanette is zoological. Sigfrid is mishnaic. Sigfrid is accessible. Sigfrid is not gloved. Sigfrid is zoological. Wally is stellate. Wally is accessible. Wally is rarefied. Wally is zoological. Lenna is accessible. Lenna is gloved. If Jeanette is rarefied and Jeanette is woody then Jeanette is accessible. White things are stellate. If Lenna is rarefied and Lenna is zoological then Lenna is mishnaic. All stellate things are woody. If Jeanette is woody and Jeanette is stellate then Jeanette is mishnaic. Blue things are rarefied. Lenna is not rarefied.", "logic": "\nStellate(jeanette)\nAccessible(jeanette)\nWoody(jeanette)\nGloved(jeanette)\nZoological(jeanette)\nMishnaic(sigfrid)\nAccessible(sigfrid)\nnot Gloved(sigfrid)\nZoological(sigfrid)\nStellate(wally)\nAccessible(wally)\nRarefied(wally)\nZoological(wally)\nAccessible(lenna)\nGloved(lenna)\nRarefied(jeanette) and Woody(jeanette) -> Accessible(jeanette)\nforall x (Gloved(x) -> Stellate(x))\nRarefied(lenna) and Zoological(lenna) -> Mishnaic(lenna)\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Woody(x))\nWoody(jeanette) and Stellate(jeanette) -> Mishnaic(jeanette)\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Rarefied(x))\n\nnot Rarefied(lenna)\n\nGloved(lenna) and forall x (Gloved(x) -> Stellate(x)) -> therefore Stellate(lenna) Stellate(lenna) and forall x (Stellate(x) -> Rarefied(x)) -> therefore Rarefied(lenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Kevin is distant. Kevin is verbal. Kevin is rancorous. Kevin is potted. Kevin is accusing. Lona is nonvisual. Lona is verbal. Lona is not potted. Lona is accusing. Luise is distant. Luise is verbal. Luise is tabby. Luise is accusing. Lilas is verbal. Lilas is potted. If Kevin is tabby and Kevin is rancorous then Kevin is verbal. White things are distant. If Lilas is tabby and Lilas is accusing then Lilas is nonvisual. All distant things are rancorous. If Kevin is rancorous and Kevin is distant then Kevin is nonvisual. Blue things are tabby. Lona is not tabby.", "logic": "\nDistant(kevin)\nVerbal(kevin)\nRancorous(kevin)\nPotted(kevin)\nAccusing(kevin)\nNonvisual(lona)\nVerbal(lona)\nnot Potted(lona)\nAccusing(lona)\nDistant(luise)\nVerbal(luise)\nTabby(luise)\nAccusing(luise)\nVerbal(lilas)\nPotted(lilas)\nTabby(kevin) and Rancorous(kevin) -> Verbal(kevin)\nforall x (Potted(x) -> Distant(x))\nTabby(lilas) and Accusing(lilas) -> Nonvisual(lilas)\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nRancorous(kevin) and Distant(kevin) -> Nonvisual(kevin)\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Tabby(x))\n\nnot Tabby(lona)\n\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Tabby(x)) <- forall x (Potted(x) -> Distant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Crissie is droopy. Crissie is fatherlike. Crissie is foliolate. Crissie is schizoid. Crissie is chancy. Gasper is descendant. Gasper is fatherlike. Gasper is not schizoid. Gasper is chancy. Astrix is droopy. Astrix is fatherlike. Astrix is autarkic. Astrix is chancy. Berke is fatherlike. Berke is schizoid. If Crissie is autarkic and Crissie is foliolate then Crissie is fatherlike. White things are droopy. If Berke is autarkic and Berke is chancy then Berke is descendant. All droopy things are foliolate. If Crissie is foliolate and Crissie is droopy then Crissie is descendant. Blue things are autarkic. Gasper is foliolate.", "logic": "\nDroopy(crissie)\nFatherlike(crissie)\nFoliolate(crissie)\nSchizoid(crissie)\nChancy(crissie)\nDescendant(gasper)\nFatherlike(gasper)\nnot Schizoid(gasper)\nChancy(gasper)\nDroopy(astrix)\nFatherlike(astrix)\nAutarkic(astrix)\nChancy(astrix)\nFatherlike(berke)\nSchizoid(berke)\nAutarkic(crissie) and Foliolate(crissie) -> Fatherlike(crissie)\nforall x (Schizoid(x) -> Droopy(x))\nAutarkic(berke) and Chancy(berke) -> Descendant(berke)\nforall x (Droopy(x) -> Foliolate(x))\nFoliolate(crissie) and Droopy(crissie) -> Descendant(crissie)\nforall x (Droopy(x) -> Autarkic(x))\n\nFoliolate(gasper)\n\nforall x (Droopy(x) -> Foliolate(x)) <- forall x (Schizoid(x) -> Droopy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Harlin is biconcave. Harlin is hyoid. Harlin is masterly. Harlin is embossed. Harlin is untracked. Theodoric is postural. Theodoric is hyoid. Theodoric is not embossed. Theodoric is untracked. Angela is biconcave. Angela is hyoid. Angela is rentable. Angela is untracked. Veriee is hyoid. Veriee is embossed. If Harlin is rentable and Harlin is masterly then Harlin is hyoid. White things are biconcave. If Veriee is rentable and Veriee is untracked then Veriee is postural. All biconcave things are masterly. If Harlin is masterly and Harlin is biconcave then Harlin is postural. Blue things are rentable. Theodoric is not biconcave.", "logic": "\nBiconcave(harlin)\nHyoid(harlin)\nMasterly(harlin)\nEmbossed(harlin)\nUntracked(harlin)\nPostural(theodoric)\nHyoid(theodoric)\nnot Embossed(theodoric)\nUntracked(theodoric)\nBiconcave(angela)\nHyoid(angela)\nRentable(angela)\nUntracked(angela)\nHyoid(veriee)\nEmbossed(veriee)\nRentable(harlin) and Masterly(harlin) -> Hyoid(harlin)\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nRentable(veriee) and Untracked(veriee) -> Postural(veriee)\nforall x (Biconcave(x) -> Masterly(x))\nMasterly(harlin) and Biconcave(harlin) -> Postural(harlin)\nforall x (Biconcave(x) -> Rentable(x))\n\nnot Biconcave(theodoric)\n\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Biconcave(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Bertrand is untalented. Bertrand is eventful. Bertrand is decadent. Bertrand is unpriestly. Bertrand is costly. Ulla is repetitive. Ulla is eventful. Ulla is not unpriestly. Ulla is costly. Lynette is untalented. Lynette is eventful. Lynette is tamable. Lynette is costly. Bianca is eventful. Bianca is unpriestly. If Bertrand is tamable and Bertrand is decadent then Bertrand is eventful. White things are untalented. If Bianca is tamable and Bianca is costly then Bianca is repetitive. All untalented things are decadent. If Bertrand is decadent and Bertrand is untalented then Bertrand is repetitive. Blue things are tamable. Bianca is costly.", "logic": "\nUntalented(bertrand)\nEventful(bertrand)\nDecadent(bertrand)\nUnpriestly(bertrand)\nCostly(bertrand)\nRepetitive(ulla)\nEventful(ulla)\nnot Unpriestly(ulla)\nCostly(ulla)\nUntalented(lynette)\nEventful(lynette)\nTamable(lynette)\nCostly(lynette)\nEventful(bianca)\nUnpriestly(bianca)\nTamable(bertrand) and Decadent(bertrand) -> Eventful(bertrand)\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) -> Untalented(x))\nTamable(bianca) and Costly(bianca) -> Repetitive(bianca)\nforall x (Untalented(x) -> Decadent(x))\nDecadent(bertrand) and Untalented(bertrand) -> Repetitive(bertrand)\nforall x (Untalented(x) -> Tamable(x))\n\nCostly(bianca)\n\nCostly(bianca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Meyer is impure. Meyer is coagulated. Meyer is stateless. Meyer is studied. Meyer is cesarean. Ewart is diametral. Ewart is coagulated. Ewart is not studied. Ewart is cesarean. Clari is impure. Clari is coagulated. Clari is tired. Clari is cesarean. Sid is coagulated. Sid is studied. If Meyer is tired and Meyer is stateless then Meyer is coagulated. White things are impure. If Sid is tired and Sid is cesarean then Sid is diametral. All impure things are stateless. If Meyer is stateless and Meyer is impure then Meyer is diametral. Blue things are tired. Clari is not studied.", "logic": "\nImpure(meyer)\nCoagulated(meyer)\nStateless(meyer)\nStudied(meyer)\nCesarean(meyer)\nDiametral(ewart)\nCoagulated(ewart)\nnot Studied(ewart)\nCesarean(ewart)\nImpure(clari)\nCoagulated(clari)\nTired(clari)\nCesarean(clari)\nCoagulated(sid)\nStudied(sid)\nTired(meyer) and Stateless(meyer) -> Coagulated(meyer)\nforall x (Studied(x) -> Impure(x))\nTired(sid) and Cesarean(sid) -> Diametral(sid)\nforall x (Impure(x) -> Stateless(x))\nStateless(meyer) and Impure(meyer) -> Diametral(meyer)\nforall x (Impure(x) -> Tired(x))\n\nnot Studied(clari)\n\nnot Studied(clari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Travis is mesodermal. Travis is eligible. Travis is acrobatic. Travis is xxxii. Travis is veinlike. Conny is consummate. Conny is eligible. Conny is not xxxii. Conny is veinlike. Jolee is mesodermal. Jolee is eligible. Jolee is outrageous. Jolee is veinlike. Carmela is eligible. Carmela is xxxii. If Travis is outrageous and Travis is acrobatic then Travis is eligible. White things are mesodermal. If Carmela is outrageous and Carmela is veinlike then Carmela is consummate. All mesodermal things are acrobatic. If Travis is acrobatic and Travis is mesodermal then Travis is consummate. Blue things are outrageous. Jolee is consummate.", "logic": "\nMesodermal(travis)\nEligible(travis)\nAcrobatic(travis)\nXxxii(travis)\nVeinlike(travis)\nConsummate(conny)\nEligible(conny)\nnot Xxxii(conny)\nVeinlike(conny)\nMesodermal(jolee)\nEligible(jolee)\nOutrageous(jolee)\nVeinlike(jolee)\nEligible(carmela)\nXxxii(carmela)\nOutrageous(travis) and Acrobatic(travis) -> Eligible(travis)\nforall x (Xxxii(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nOutrageous(carmela) and Veinlike(carmela) -> Consummate(carmela)\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Acrobatic(x))\nAcrobatic(travis) and Mesodermal(travis) -> Consummate(travis)\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Outrageous(x))\n\nConsummate(jolee)\n\nConsummate(jolee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Fletch is plumelike. Ileane is affined. Furry people are beneficial. If Ileane is employable and Ileane is beneficial then Ileane is penile. Blue people are penile. Ileane is affined.", "logic": "\nPlumelike(fletch)\nAffined(ileane)\nforall x (Affined(x) -> Beneficial(x))\nEmployable(ileane) and Beneficial(ileane) -> Penile(ileane)\nforall x (Beneficial(x) -> Penile(x))\n\nAffined(ileane)\n\ntherefore Affined(ileane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Barrett is patterned. Trent is motley. Furry people are flowery. If Trent is churlish and Trent is flowery then Trent is bizarre. Blue people are bizarre. Barrett is not patterned.", "logic": "\nPatterned(barrett)\nMotley(trent)\nforall x (Motley(x) -> Flowery(x))\nChurlish(trent) and Flowery(trent) -> Bizarre(trent)\nforall x (Flowery(x) -> Bizarre(x))\n\nnot Patterned(barrett)\n\ntherefore Patterned(barrett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Karia is russet. Martina is allylic. Furry people are bullying. If Martina is regal and Martina is bullying then Martina is gone. Blue people are gone. Martina is bullying.", "logic": "\nRusset(karia)\nAllylic(martina)\nforall x (Allylic(x) -> Bullying(x))\nRegal(martina) and Bullying(martina) -> Gone(martina)\nforall x (Bullying(x) -> Gone(x))\n\nBullying(martina)\n\nAllylic(martina) and forall x (Allylic(x) -> Bullying(x)) -> therefore Bullying(martina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Rosene is mere. Arlen is mated. Furry people are esoteric. If Arlen is unifoliate and Arlen is esoteric then Arlen is arcuate. Blue people are arcuate. Arlen is not esoteric.", "logic": "\nMere(rosene)\nMated(arlen)\nforall x (Mated(x) -> Esoteric(x))\nUnifoliate(arlen) and Esoteric(arlen) -> Arcuate(arlen)\nforall x (Esoteric(x) -> Arcuate(x))\n\nnot Esoteric(arlen)\n\nMated(arlen) and forall x (Mated(x) -> Esoteric(x)) -> therefore Esoteric(arlen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Anetta is altissimo. Karita is slim. Furry people are unseeing. If Karita is sleeping and Karita is unseeing then Karita is fired. Blue people are fired. Karita is fired.", "logic": "\nAltissimo(anetta)\nSlim(karita)\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Unseeing(x))\nSleeping(karita) and Unseeing(karita) -> Fired(karita)\nforall x (Unseeing(x) -> Fired(x))\n\nFired(karita)\n\nSlim(karita) and forall x (Slim(x) -> Unseeing(x)) -> therefore Unseeing(karita) Unseeing(karita) and forall x (Unseeing(x) -> Fired(x)) -> therefore Fired(karita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Beilul is abuzz. Melina is pyknotic. Furry people are inlaid. If Melina is honest and Melina is inlaid then Melina is fenestral. Blue people are fenestral. Melina is not fenestral.", "logic": "\nAbuzz(beilul)\nPyknotic(melina)\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Inlaid(x))\nHonest(melina) and Inlaid(melina) -> Fenestral(melina)\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Fenestral(x))\n\nnot Fenestral(melina)\n\nPyknotic(melina) and forall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Inlaid(x)) -> therefore Inlaid(melina) Inlaid(melina) and forall x (Inlaid(x) -> Fenestral(x)) -> therefore Fenestral(melina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Wade is diarrheal. Mara is lento. Furry people are sagittal. If Mara is star and Mara is sagittal then Mara is struggling. Blue people are struggling. Wade is not struggling.", "logic": "\nDiarrheal(wade)\nLento(mara)\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nStar(mara) and Sagittal(mara) -> Struggling(mara)\nforall x (Sagittal(x) -> Struggling(x))\n\nnot Struggling(wade)\n\nforall x (Sagittal(x) -> Struggling(x)) <- forall x (Lento(x) -> Sagittal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Deane is tractile. Tharen is uncooked. Furry people are nonstick. If Tharen is bombastic and Tharen is nonstick then Tharen is absorptive. Blue people are absorptive. Deane is nonstick.", "logic": "\nTractile(deane)\nUncooked(tharen)\nforall x (Uncooked(x) -> Nonstick(x))\nBombastic(tharen) and Nonstick(tharen) -> Absorptive(tharen)\nforall x (Nonstick(x) -> Absorptive(x))\n\nNonstick(deane)\n\nforall x (Uncooked(x) -> Nonstick(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Jenine is eponymic. Cacilie is expected. Furry people are preteen. If Cacilie is cathedral and Cacilie is preteen then Cacilie is unfearing. Blue people are unfearing. Cacilie is not round.", "logic": "\nEponymic(jenine)\nExpected(cacilie)\nforall x (Expected(x) -> Preteen(x))\nCathedral(cacilie) and Preteen(cacilie) -> Unfearing(cacilie)\nforall x (Preteen(x) -> Unfearing(x))\n\nnot Round(cacilie)\n\nnot Round(cacilie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Stacee is worthful. Sadie is contiguous. Furry people are repeated. If Sadie is esthetic and Sadie is repeated then Sadie is wailing. Blue people are wailing. Sadie is nice.", "logic": "\nWorthful(stacee)\nContiguous(sadie)\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Repeated(x))\nEsthetic(sadie) and Repeated(sadie) -> Wailing(sadie)\nforall x (Repeated(x) -> Wailing(x))\n\nNice(sadie)\n\nNice(sadie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Mac is ribbonlike. Kellie is tolerant. Furry people are prepaid. If Kellie is globose and Kellie is prepaid then Kellie is cxlv. Blue people are cxlv. Mac is not nice.", "logic": "\nRibbonlike(mac)\nTolerant(kellie)\nforall x (Tolerant(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nGlobose(kellie) and Prepaid(kellie) -> Cxlv(kellie)\nforall x (Prepaid(x) -> Cxlv(x))\n\nnot Nice(mac)\n\nnot Nice(mac) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "Hedy is crocked. Lonna is heathen. Furry people are tsarist. If Lonna is polemic and Lonna is tsarist then Lonna is archaistic. Blue people are archaistic. Lonna is crocked.", "logic": "\nCrocked(hedy)\nHeathen(lonna)\nforall x (Heathen(x) -> Tsarist(x))\nPolemic(lonna) and Tsarist(lonna) -> Archaistic(lonna)\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Archaistic(x))\n\nCrocked(lonna)\n\nCrocked(lonna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1979"} {"premises": "The yolanthe is immoral. Young people are oldish. If someone is virtual then they are immoral. Young, oldish people are virtual. Cold people are pure. If someone is oldish and virtual then they are pure. If someone is nescient then they are pure. Cold people are oldish. Round, immoral people are oldish. The yolanthe is immoral.", "logic": "\nImmoral(yolanthe)\nforall x (Immoral(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Virtual(x) -> Immoral(x))\nforall x (Immoral(x) and Oldish(x) -> Virtual(x))\nforall x (Virtual(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) and Virtual(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Virtual(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Pure(x) and Immoral(x) -> Oldish(x))\n\nImmoral(yolanthe)\n\ntherefore Immoral(yolanthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The cherilyn is screwball. Young people are paranormal. If someone is aphaeretic then they are screwball. Young, paranormal people are aphaeretic. Cold people are forbearing. If someone is paranormal and aphaeretic then they are forbearing. If someone is refulgent then they are forbearing. Cold people are paranormal. Round, screwball people are paranormal. The cherilyn is not screwball.", "logic": "\nScrewball(cherilyn)\nforall x (Screwball(x) -> Paranormal(x))\nforall x (Aphaeretic(x) -> Screwball(x))\nforall x (Screwball(x) and Paranormal(x) -> Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Aphaeretic(x) -> Forbearing(x))\nforall x (Paranormal(x) and Aphaeretic(x) -> Forbearing(x))\nforall x (Refulgent(x) -> Forbearing(x))\nforall x (Aphaeretic(x) -> Paranormal(x))\nforall x (Forbearing(x) and Screwball(x) -> Paranormal(x))\n\nnot Screwball(cherilyn)\n\ntherefore Screwball(cherilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The teddie is exaugural. Young people are viceregal. If someone is prismatic then they are exaugural. Young, viceregal people are prismatic. Cold people are unbroken. If someone is viceregal and prismatic then they are unbroken. If someone is rodlike then they are unbroken. Cold people are viceregal. Round, exaugural people are viceregal. The teddie is viceregal.", "logic": "\nExaugural(teddie)\nforall x (Exaugural(x) -> Viceregal(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) -> Exaugural(x))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) and Viceregal(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) -> Unbroken(x))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) and Prismatic(x) -> Unbroken(x))\nforall x (Rodlike(x) -> Unbroken(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) -> Viceregal(x))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) and Exaugural(x) -> Viceregal(x))\n\nViceregal(teddie)\n\nExaugural(teddie) and forall x (Exaugural(x) -> Viceregal(x)) -> therefore Viceregal(teddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The shayna is undatable. Young people are ruling. If someone is dimorphous then they are undatable. Young, ruling people are dimorphous. Cold people are assailable. If someone is ruling and dimorphous then they are assailable. If someone is lightsome then they are assailable. Cold people are ruling. Round, undatable people are ruling. The shayna is not ruling.", "logic": "\nUndatable(shayna)\nforall x (Undatable(x) -> Ruling(x))\nforall x (Dimorphous(x) -> Undatable(x))\nforall x (Undatable(x) and Ruling(x) -> Dimorphous(x))\nforall x (Dimorphous(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Ruling(x) and Dimorphous(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Dimorphous(x) -> Ruling(x))\nforall x (Assailable(x) and Undatable(x) -> Ruling(x))\n\nnot Ruling(shayna)\n\nUndatable(shayna) and forall x (Undatable(x) -> Ruling(x)) -> therefore Ruling(shayna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The candice is orbital. Young people are penile. If someone is puzzled then they are orbital. Young, penile people are puzzled. Cold people are precatory. If someone is penile and puzzled then they are precatory. If someone is unstaged then they are precatory. Cold people are penile. Round, orbital people are penile. The candice is puzzled.", "logic": "\nOrbital(candice)\nforall x (Orbital(x) -> Penile(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Orbital(x))\nforall x (Orbital(x) and Penile(x) -> Puzzled(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Penile(x) and Puzzled(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Unstaged(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Penile(x))\nforall x (Precatory(x) and Orbital(x) -> Penile(x))\n\nPuzzled(candice)\n\nOrbital(candice) and forall x (Orbital(x) -> Penile(x)) -> therefore Penile(candice) Orbital(candice) and Penile(candice) and forall x (Orbital(x) and Penile(x) -> Puzzled(x)) -> therefore Puzzled(candice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The erminia is caloric. Young people are acetous. If someone is permanent then they are caloric. Young, acetous people are permanent. Cold people are luminous. If someone is acetous and permanent then they are luminous. If someone is milanese then they are luminous. Cold people are acetous. Round, caloric people are acetous. The erminia is not permanent.", "logic": "\nCaloric(erminia)\nforall x (Caloric(x) -> Acetous(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Caloric(x))\nforall x (Caloric(x) and Acetous(x) -> Permanent(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Luminous(x))\nforall x (Acetous(x) and Permanent(x) -> Luminous(x))\nforall x (Milanese(x) -> Luminous(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Acetous(x))\nforall x (Luminous(x) and Caloric(x) -> Acetous(x))\n\nnot Permanent(erminia)\n\nCaloric(erminia) and forall x (Caloric(x) -> Acetous(x)) -> therefore Acetous(erminia) Caloric(erminia) and Acetous(erminia) and forall x (Caloric(x) and Acetous(x) -> Permanent(x)) -> therefore Permanent(erminia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The ruby is bilabiate. Young people are anginous. If someone is tantric then they are bilabiate. Young, anginous people are tantric. Cold people are veteran. If someone is anginous and tantric then they are veteran. If someone is captivated then they are veteran. Cold people are anginous. Round, bilabiate people are anginous. The ruby does not need the ruby.", "logic": "\nBilabiate(ruby)\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Anginous(x))\nforall x (Tantric(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) and Anginous(x) -> Tantric(x))\nforall x (Tantric(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Anginous(x) and Tantric(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Captivated(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Tantric(x) -> Anginous(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Bilabiate(x) -> Anginous(x))\n\nnot Needs(ruby, ruby)\n\nnot Needs(ruby, ruby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The ian is campy. Young people are nigh. If someone is worthwhile then they are campy. Young, nigh people are worthwhile. Cold people are duckbill. If someone is nigh and worthwhile then they are duckbill. If someone is stigmatic then they are duckbill. Cold people are nigh. Round, campy people are nigh. The ian eats the ian.", "logic": "\nCampy(ian)\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Nigh(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Campy(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) and Nigh(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Nigh(x) and Worthwhile(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Stigmatic(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Nigh(x))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Campy(x) -> Nigh(x))\n\nEats(ian, ian)\n\nEats(ian, ian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The murray is nonspatial. Young people are jamesian. If someone is brindle then they are nonspatial. Young, jamesian people are brindle. Cold people are anaglyptic. If someone is jamesian and brindle then they are anaglyptic. If someone is wasted then they are anaglyptic. Cold people are jamesian. Round, nonspatial people are jamesian. The murray is not wasted.", "logic": "\nNonspatial(murray)\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Jamesian(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) and Jamesian(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nforall x (Jamesian(x) and Brindle(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nforall x (Wasted(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Jamesian(x))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) and Nonspatial(x) -> Jamesian(x))\n\nnot Wasted(murray)\n\nnot Wasted(murray) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "The margareta is zany. Young people are scrub. If someone is germanic then they are zany. Young, scrub people are germanic. Cold people are alsatian. If someone is scrub and germanic then they are alsatian. If someone is warmed then they are alsatian. Cold people are scrub. Round, zany people are scrub. The margareta likes the margareta.", "logic": "\nZany(margareta)\nforall x (Zany(x) -> Scrub(x))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Zany(x))\nforall x (Zany(x) and Scrub(x) -> Germanic(x))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Alsatian(x))\nforall x (Scrub(x) and Germanic(x) -> Alsatian(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Alsatian(x))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Scrub(x))\nforall x (Alsatian(x) and Zany(x) -> Scrub(x))\n\nLikes(margareta, margareta)\n\nLikes(margareta, margareta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1627"} {"premises": "Chere is prophetic. Oralee is reasonless. Oralee is earthly. Oralee is prophetic. Oralee is phlegmatic. Oralee is cxxv. Oralee is biogenic. Oralee is idealized. Katey is earthly. Katey is cxxv. Katey is biogenic. Katey is idealized. Oscar is reasonless. Oscar is earthly. Oscar is prophetic. If Chere is prophetic then Chere is phlegmatic. Nice people are cxxv. Furry people are phlegmatic. If Oscar is reasonless and Oscar is idealized then Oscar is prophetic. Smart people are idealized. All reasonless, prophetic people are phlegmatic. If someone is biogenic then they are cxxv. If someone is earthly then they are reasonless. Katey is earthly.", "logic": "\nProphetic(chere)\nReasonless(oralee)\nEarthly(oralee)\nProphetic(oralee)\nPhlegmatic(oralee)\nCxxv(oralee)\nBiogenic(oralee)\nIdealized(oralee)\nEarthly(katey)\nCxxv(katey)\nBiogenic(katey)\nIdealized(katey)\nReasonless(oscar)\nEarthly(oscar)\nProphetic(oscar)\nProphetic(chere) -> Phlegmatic(chere)\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) -> Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\nReasonless(oscar) and Idealized(oscar) -> Prophetic(oscar)\nforall x (Biogenic(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Reasonless(x) and Prophetic(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\nforall x (Biogenic(x) -> Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Reasonless(x))\n\nEarthly(katey)\n\ntherefore Earthly(katey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Evvy is chondritic. Shawna is waggish. Shawna is invaluable. Shawna is chondritic. Shawna is rustless. Shawna is earlier. Shawna is amoebous. Shawna is ruffled. Friedrick is invaluable. Friedrick is earlier. Friedrick is amoebous. Friedrick is ruffled. Jayme is waggish. Jayme is invaluable. Jayme is chondritic. If Evvy is chondritic then Evvy is rustless. Nice people are earlier. Furry people are rustless. If Jayme is waggish and Jayme is ruffled then Jayme is chondritic. Smart people are ruffled. All waggish, chondritic people are rustless. If someone is amoebous then they are earlier. If someone is invaluable then they are waggish. Jayme is not invaluable.", "logic": "\nChondritic(evvy)\nWaggish(shawna)\nInvaluable(shawna)\nChondritic(shawna)\nRustless(shawna)\nEarlier(shawna)\nAmoebous(shawna)\nRuffled(shawna)\nInvaluable(friedrick)\nEarlier(friedrick)\nAmoebous(friedrick)\nRuffled(friedrick)\nWaggish(jayme)\nInvaluable(jayme)\nChondritic(jayme)\nChondritic(evvy) -> Rustless(evvy)\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Earlier(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Rustless(x))\nWaggish(jayme) and Ruffled(jayme) -> Chondritic(jayme)\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Ruffled(x))\nforall x (Waggish(x) and Chondritic(x) -> Rustless(x))\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Earlier(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Waggish(x))\n\nnot Invaluable(jayme)\n\ntherefore Invaluable(jayme)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Happy is wooly. Cherye is catapultic. Cherye is piffling. Cherye is wooly. Cherye is spectacled. Cherye is suntanned. Cherye is lento. Cherye is miffed. Myrilla is piffling. Myrilla is suntanned. Myrilla is lento. Myrilla is miffed. Wanda is catapultic. Wanda is piffling. Wanda is wooly. If Happy is wooly then Happy is spectacled. Nice people are suntanned. Furry people are spectacled. If Wanda is catapultic and Wanda is miffed then Wanda is wooly. Smart people are miffed. All catapultic, wooly people are spectacled. If someone is lento then they are suntanned. If someone is piffling then they are catapultic. Myrilla is catapultic.", "logic": "\nWooly(happy)\nCatapultic(cherye)\nPiffling(cherye)\nWooly(cherye)\nSpectacled(cherye)\nSuntanned(cherye)\nLento(cherye)\nMiffed(cherye)\nPiffling(myrilla)\nSuntanned(myrilla)\nLento(myrilla)\nMiffed(myrilla)\nCatapultic(wanda)\nPiffling(wanda)\nWooly(wanda)\nWooly(happy) -> Spectacled(happy)\nforall x (Spectacled(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> Spectacled(x))\nCatapultic(wanda) and Miffed(wanda) -> Wooly(wanda)\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Wooly(x) -> Spectacled(x))\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> Catapultic(x))\n\nCatapultic(myrilla)\n\nPiffling(myrilla) and forall x (Piffling(x) -> Catapultic(x)) -> therefore Catapultic(myrilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Randolf is clueless. Turner is succulent. Turner is groomed. Turner is clueless. Turner is federate. Turner is deprived. Turner is drunk. Turner is eventual. Lawerence is groomed. Lawerence is deprived. Lawerence is drunk. Lawerence is eventual. Krystal is succulent. Krystal is groomed. Krystal is clueless. If Randolf is clueless then Randolf is federate. Nice people are deprived. Furry people are federate. If Krystal is succulent and Krystal is eventual then Krystal is clueless. Smart people are eventual. All succulent, clueless people are federate. If someone is drunk then they are deprived. If someone is groomed then they are succulent. Lawerence is not succulent.", "logic": "\nClueless(randolf)\nSucculent(turner)\nGroomed(turner)\nClueless(turner)\nFederate(turner)\nDeprived(turner)\nDrunk(turner)\nEventual(turner)\nGroomed(lawerence)\nDeprived(lawerence)\nDrunk(lawerence)\nEventual(lawerence)\nSucculent(krystal)\nGroomed(krystal)\nClueless(krystal)\nClueless(randolf) -> Federate(randolf)\nforall x (Federate(x) -> Deprived(x))\nforall x (Groomed(x) -> Federate(x))\nSucculent(krystal) and Eventual(krystal) -> Clueless(krystal)\nforall x (Drunk(x) -> Eventual(x))\nforall x (Succulent(x) and Clueless(x) -> Federate(x))\nforall x (Drunk(x) -> Deprived(x))\nforall x (Groomed(x) -> Succulent(x))\n\nnot Succulent(lawerence)\n\nGroomed(lawerence) and forall x (Groomed(x) -> Succulent(x)) -> therefore Succulent(lawerence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Eustace is moribund. Mitchael is improved. Mitchael is lean. Mitchael is moribund. Mitchael is slaty. Mitchael is aerophilic. Mitchael is twopenny. Mitchael is nebulose. Alvin is lean. Alvin is aerophilic. Alvin is twopenny. Alvin is nebulose. Ilana is improved. Ilana is lean. Ilana is moribund. If Eustace is moribund then Eustace is slaty. Nice people are aerophilic. Furry people are slaty. If Ilana is improved and Ilana is nebulose then Ilana is moribund. Smart people are nebulose. All improved, moribund people are slaty. If someone is twopenny then they are aerophilic. If someone is lean then they are improved. Eustace is aerophilic.", "logic": "\nMoribund(eustace)\nImproved(mitchael)\nLean(mitchael)\nMoribund(mitchael)\nSlaty(mitchael)\nAerophilic(mitchael)\nTwopenny(mitchael)\nNebulose(mitchael)\nLean(alvin)\nAerophilic(alvin)\nTwopenny(alvin)\nNebulose(alvin)\nImproved(ilana)\nLean(ilana)\nMoribund(ilana)\nMoribund(eustace) -> Slaty(eustace)\nforall x (Slaty(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nforall x (Lean(x) -> Slaty(x))\nImproved(ilana) and Nebulose(ilana) -> Moribund(ilana)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Improved(x) and Moribund(x) -> Slaty(x))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nforall x (Lean(x) -> Improved(x))\n\nAerophilic(eustace)\n\nMoribund(eustace) and Moribund(eustace) -> Slaty(eustace) -> therefore Slaty(eustace) Slaty(eustace) and forall x (Slaty(x) -> Aerophilic(x)) -> therefore Aerophilic(eustace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Madalyn is forte. Frayda is authentic. Frayda is mycenaean. Frayda is forte. Frayda is andalusian. Frayda is sweetened. Frayda is defunct. Frayda is rushed. Honor is mycenaean. Honor is sweetened. Honor is defunct. Honor is rushed. Becki is authentic. Becki is mycenaean. Becki is forte. If Madalyn is forte then Madalyn is andalusian. Nice people are sweetened. Furry people are andalusian. If Becki is authentic and Becki is rushed then Becki is forte. Smart people are rushed. All authentic, forte people are andalusian. If someone is defunct then they are sweetened. If someone is mycenaean then they are authentic. Madalyn is not sweetened.", "logic": "\nForte(madalyn)\nAuthentic(frayda)\nMycenaean(frayda)\nForte(frayda)\nAndalusian(frayda)\nSweetened(frayda)\nDefunct(frayda)\nRushed(frayda)\nMycenaean(honor)\nSweetened(honor)\nDefunct(honor)\nRushed(honor)\nAuthentic(becki)\nMycenaean(becki)\nForte(becki)\nForte(madalyn) -> Andalusian(madalyn)\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nAuthentic(becki) and Rushed(becki) -> Forte(becki)\nforall x (Defunct(x) -> Rushed(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Forte(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Defunct(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Authentic(x))\n\nnot Sweetened(madalyn)\n\nForte(madalyn) and Forte(madalyn) -> Andalusian(madalyn) -> therefore Andalusian(madalyn) Andalusian(madalyn) and forall x (Andalusian(x) -> Sweetened(x)) -> therefore Sweetened(madalyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Karyl is smooth. Kim is capillary. Kim is warmed. Kim is smooth. Kim is vermicular. Kim is towering. Kim is synchronal. Kim is discontent. Kerianne is warmed. Kerianne is towering. Kerianne is synchronal. Kerianne is discontent. Caroljean is capillary. Caroljean is warmed. Caroljean is smooth. If Karyl is smooth then Karyl is vermicular. Nice people are towering. Furry people are vermicular. If Caroljean is capillary and Caroljean is discontent then Caroljean is smooth. Smart people are discontent. All capillary, smooth people are vermicular. If someone is synchronal then they are towering. If someone is warmed then they are capillary. Karyl is not discontent.", "logic": "\nSmooth(karyl)\nCapillary(kim)\nWarmed(kim)\nSmooth(kim)\nVermicular(kim)\nTowering(kim)\nSynchronal(kim)\nDiscontent(kim)\nWarmed(kerianne)\nTowering(kerianne)\nSynchronal(kerianne)\nDiscontent(kerianne)\nCapillary(caroljean)\nWarmed(caroljean)\nSmooth(caroljean)\nSmooth(karyl) -> Vermicular(karyl)\nforall x (Vermicular(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nCapillary(caroljean) and Discontent(caroljean) -> Smooth(caroljean)\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Discontent(x))\nforall x (Capillary(x) and Smooth(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Capillary(x))\n\nnot Discontent(karyl)\n\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Discontent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Rodolph is attractive. Christen is radiating. Christen is keen. Christen is attractive. Christen is fitter. Christen is treeless. Christen is aforesaid. Christen is formic. Brant is keen. Brant is treeless. Brant is aforesaid. Brant is formic. Charity is radiating. Charity is keen. Charity is attractive. If Rodolph is attractive then Rodolph is fitter. Nice people are treeless. Furry people are fitter. If Charity is radiating and Charity is formic then Charity is attractive. Smart people are formic. All radiating, attractive people are fitter. If someone is aforesaid then they are treeless. If someone is keen then they are radiating. Charity is formic.", "logic": "\nAttractive(rodolph)\nRadiating(christen)\nKeen(christen)\nAttractive(christen)\nFitter(christen)\nTreeless(christen)\nAforesaid(christen)\nFormic(christen)\nKeen(brant)\nTreeless(brant)\nAforesaid(brant)\nFormic(brant)\nRadiating(charity)\nKeen(charity)\nAttractive(charity)\nAttractive(rodolph) -> Fitter(rodolph)\nforall x (Fitter(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Keen(x) -> Fitter(x))\nRadiating(charity) and Formic(charity) -> Attractive(charity)\nforall x (Aforesaid(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Attractive(x) -> Fitter(x))\nforall x (Aforesaid(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Keen(x) -> Radiating(x))\n\nFormic(charity)\n\nforall x (Aforesaid(x) -> Formic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Nora is lobated. Doro is furtive. Doro is bitter. Doro is lobated. Doro is rife. Doro is underhand. Doro is crackers. Doro is antiguan. Xever is bitter. Xever is underhand. Xever is crackers. Xever is antiguan. Gleda is furtive. Gleda is bitter. Gleda is lobated. If Nora is lobated then Nora is rife. Nice people are underhand. Furry people are rife. If Gleda is furtive and Gleda is antiguan then Gleda is lobated. Smart people are antiguan. All furtive, lobated people are rife. If someone is crackers then they are underhand. If someone is bitter then they are furtive. Nora is not furtive.", "logic": "\nLobated(nora)\nFurtive(doro)\nBitter(doro)\nLobated(doro)\nRife(doro)\nUnderhand(doro)\nCrackers(doro)\nAntiguan(doro)\nBitter(xever)\nUnderhand(xever)\nCrackers(xever)\nAntiguan(xever)\nFurtive(gleda)\nBitter(gleda)\nLobated(gleda)\nLobated(nora) -> Rife(nora)\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Rife(x))\nFurtive(gleda) and Antiguan(gleda) -> Lobated(gleda)\nforall x (Crackers(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Furtive(x) and Lobated(x) -> Rife(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Furtive(x))\n\nnot Furtive(nora)\n\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Furtive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Griffith is smothering. Oswell is shoaly. Oswell is uneducated. Oswell is smothering. Oswell is arching. Oswell is mediaeval. Oswell is chondritic. Oswell is dated. Missy is uneducated. Missy is mediaeval. Missy is chondritic. Missy is dated. Fidelia is shoaly. Fidelia is uneducated. Fidelia is smothering. If Griffith is smothering then Griffith is arching. Nice people are mediaeval. Furry people are arching. If Fidelia is shoaly and Fidelia is dated then Fidelia is smothering. Smart people are dated. All shoaly, smothering people are arching. If someone is chondritic then they are mediaeval. If someone is uneducated then they are shoaly. Griffith is uneducated.", "logic": "\nSmothering(griffith)\nShoaly(oswell)\nUneducated(oswell)\nSmothering(oswell)\nArching(oswell)\nMediaeval(oswell)\nChondritic(oswell)\nDated(oswell)\nUneducated(missy)\nMediaeval(missy)\nChondritic(missy)\nDated(missy)\nShoaly(fidelia)\nUneducated(fidelia)\nSmothering(fidelia)\nSmothering(griffith) -> Arching(griffith)\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Arching(x))\nShoaly(fidelia) and Dated(fidelia) -> Smothering(fidelia)\nforall x (Chondritic(x) -> Dated(x))\nforall x (Shoaly(x) and Smothering(x) -> Arching(x))\nforall x (Chondritic(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Shoaly(x))\n\nUneducated(griffith)\n\nUneducated(griffith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Essy is lackluster. Bharat is unweary. Bharat is translunar. Bharat is lackluster. Bharat is spurting. Bharat is shellproof. Bharat is damask. Bharat is roan. Gretchen is translunar. Gretchen is shellproof. Gretchen is damask. Gretchen is roan. Mame is unweary. Mame is translunar. Mame is lackluster. If Essy is lackluster then Essy is spurting. Nice people are shellproof. Furry people are spurting. If Mame is unweary and Mame is roan then Mame is lackluster. Smart people are roan. All unweary, lackluster people are spurting. If someone is damask then they are shellproof. If someone is translunar then they are unweary. Mame is not damask.", "logic": "\nLackluster(essy)\nUnweary(bharat)\nTranslunar(bharat)\nLackluster(bharat)\nSpurting(bharat)\nShellproof(bharat)\nDamask(bharat)\nRoan(bharat)\nTranslunar(gretchen)\nShellproof(gretchen)\nDamask(gretchen)\nRoan(gretchen)\nUnweary(mame)\nTranslunar(mame)\nLackluster(mame)\nLackluster(essy) -> Spurting(essy)\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Shellproof(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) -> Spurting(x))\nUnweary(mame) and Roan(mame) -> Lackluster(mame)\nforall x (Damask(x) -> Roan(x))\nforall x (Unweary(x) and Lackluster(x) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Damask(x) -> Shellproof(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) -> Unweary(x))\n\nnot Damask(mame)\n\nnot Damask(mame) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "Jessee is coseismal. Ellwood is classy. Ellwood is careless. Ellwood is coseismal. Ellwood is empathic. Ellwood is regulated. Ellwood is eminent. Ellwood is aseptic. Margalo is careless. Margalo is regulated. Margalo is eminent. Margalo is aseptic. Norry is classy. Norry is careless. Norry is coseismal. If Jessee is coseismal then Jessee is empathic. Nice people are regulated. Furry people are empathic. If Norry is classy and Norry is aseptic then Norry is coseismal. Smart people are aseptic. All classy, coseismal people are empathic. If someone is eminent then they are regulated. If someone is careless then they are classy. Jessee is eminent.", "logic": "\nCoseismal(jessee)\nClassy(ellwood)\nCareless(ellwood)\nCoseismal(ellwood)\nEmpathic(ellwood)\nRegulated(ellwood)\nEminent(ellwood)\nAseptic(ellwood)\nCareless(margalo)\nRegulated(margalo)\nEminent(margalo)\nAseptic(margalo)\nClassy(norry)\nCareless(norry)\nCoseismal(norry)\nCoseismal(jessee) -> Empathic(jessee)\nforall x (Empathic(x) -> Regulated(x))\nforall x (Careless(x) -> Empathic(x))\nClassy(norry) and Aseptic(norry) -> Coseismal(norry)\nforall x (Eminent(x) -> Aseptic(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) and Coseismal(x) -> Empathic(x))\nforall x (Eminent(x) -> Regulated(x))\nforall x (Careless(x) -> Classy(x))\n\nEminent(jessee)\n\nEminent(jessee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-892"} {"premises": "The marney is dainty. The marney is innate. The marney is salable. If someone is dainty then they are concordant. If the marney is criterial and the marney is concordant then the marney is innate. Green people are criterial. All concordant, criterial people are dainty. If the marney is innate and the marney is criterial then the marney is dainty. All criterial people are salable. The marney is dainty.", "logic": "\nDainty(marney)\nInnate(marney)\nSalable(marney)\nforall x (Dainty(x) -> Concordant(x))\nCriterial(marney) and Concordant(marney) -> Innate(marney)\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Concordant(x) and Criterial(x) -> Dainty(x))\nInnate(marney) and Criterial(marney) -> Dainty(marney)\nforall x (Criterial(x) -> Salable(x))\n\nDainty(marney)\n\ntherefore Dainty(marney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "The caressa is putrescent. The caressa is obsequious. The caressa is loony. If someone is putrescent then they are unshaped. If the caressa is tzarist and the caressa is unshaped then the caressa is obsequious. Green people are tzarist. All unshaped, tzarist people are putrescent. If the caressa is obsequious and the caressa is tzarist then the caressa is putrescent. All tzarist people are loony. The caressa is not loony.", "logic": "\nPutrescent(caressa)\nObsequious(caressa)\nLoony(caressa)\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Unshaped(x))\nTzarist(caressa) and Unshaped(caressa) -> Obsequious(caressa)\nforall x (Unshaped(x) -> Tzarist(x))\nforall x (Unshaped(x) and Tzarist(x) -> Putrescent(x))\nObsequious(caressa) and Tzarist(caressa) -> Putrescent(caressa)\nforall x (Tzarist(x) -> Loony(x))\n\nnot Loony(caressa)\n\ntherefore Loony(caressa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "The barbee is hadean. The barbee is denotative. The barbee is eolotropic. If someone is hadean then they are delicious. If the barbee is conceptual and the barbee is delicious then the barbee is denotative. Green people are conceptual. All delicious, conceptual people are hadean. If the barbee is denotative and the barbee is conceptual then the barbee is hadean. All conceptual people are eolotropic. The barbee is delicious.", "logic": "\nHadean(barbee)\nDenotative(barbee)\nEolotropic(barbee)\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Delicious(x))\nConceptual(barbee) and Delicious(barbee) -> Denotative(barbee)\nforall x (Delicious(x) -> Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Delicious(x) and Conceptual(x) -> Hadean(x))\nDenotative(barbee) and Conceptual(barbee) -> Hadean(barbee)\nforall x (Conceptual(x) -> Eolotropic(x))\n\nDelicious(barbee)\n\nHadean(barbee) and forall x (Hadean(x) -> Delicious(x)) -> therefore Delicious(barbee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "The markos is choppy. The markos is chaotic. The markos is intact. If someone is choppy then they are storied. If the markos is attained and the markos is storied then the markos is chaotic. Green people are attained. All storied, attained people are choppy. If the markos is chaotic and the markos is attained then the markos is choppy. All attained people are intact. The markos is not storied.", "logic": "\nChoppy(markos)\nChaotic(markos)\nIntact(markos)\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Storied(x))\nAttained(markos) and Storied(markos) -> Chaotic(markos)\nforall x (Storied(x) -> Attained(x))\nforall x (Storied(x) and Attained(x) -> Choppy(x))\nChaotic(markos) and Attained(markos) -> Choppy(markos)\nforall x (Attained(x) -> Intact(x))\n\nnot Storied(markos)\n\nChoppy(markos) and forall x (Choppy(x) -> Storied(x)) -> therefore Storied(markos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "The tawsha is homely. The tawsha is agnate. The tawsha is incased. If someone is homely then they are ruandan. If the tawsha is tapestried and the tawsha is ruandan then the tawsha is agnate. Green people are tapestried. All ruandan, tapestried people are homely. If the tawsha is agnate and the tawsha is tapestried then the tawsha is homely. All tapestried people are incased. The tawsha is tapestried.", "logic": "\nHomely(tawsha)\nAgnate(tawsha)\nIncased(tawsha)\nforall x (Homely(x) -> Ruandan(x))\nTapestried(tawsha) and Ruandan(tawsha) -> Agnate(tawsha)\nforall x (Ruandan(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Homely(x))\nAgnate(tawsha) and Tapestried(tawsha) -> Homely(tawsha)\nforall x (Tapestried(x) -> Incased(x))\n\nTapestried(tawsha)\n\nHomely(tawsha) and forall x (Homely(x) -> Ruandan(x)) -> therefore Ruandan(tawsha) Ruandan(tawsha) and forall x (Ruandan(x) -> Tapestried(x)) -> therefore Tapestried(tawsha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "The hall is fordable. The hall is waterborne. The hall is encrusted. If someone is fordable then they are creedal. If the hall is unlaced and the hall is creedal then the hall is waterborne. Green people are unlaced. All creedal, unlaced people are fordable. If the hall is waterborne and the hall is unlaced then the hall is fordable. All unlaced people are encrusted. The hall is not unlaced.", "logic": "\nFordable(hall)\nWaterborne(hall)\nEncrusted(hall)\nforall x (Fordable(x) -> Creedal(x))\nUnlaced(hall) and Creedal(hall) -> Waterborne(hall)\nforall x (Creedal(x) -> Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Creedal(x) and Unlaced(x) -> Fordable(x))\nWaterborne(hall) and Unlaced(hall) -> Fordable(hall)\nforall x (Unlaced(x) -> Encrusted(x))\n\nnot Unlaced(hall)\n\nFordable(hall) and forall x (Fordable(x) -> Creedal(x)) -> therefore Creedal(hall) Creedal(hall) and forall x (Creedal(x) -> Unlaced(x)) -> therefore Unlaced(hall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "The vivie is grassy. The vivie is sexy. The vivie is autarkic. If someone is grassy then they are effective. If the vivie is remediable and the vivie is effective then the vivie is sexy. Green people are remediable. All effective, remediable people are grassy. If the vivie is sexy and the vivie is remediable then the vivie is grassy. All remediable people are autarkic. The vivie does not see the vivie.", "logic": "\nGrassy(vivie)\nSexy(vivie)\nAutarkic(vivie)\nforall x (Grassy(x) -> Effective(x))\nRemediable(vivie) and Effective(vivie) -> Sexy(vivie)\nforall x (Effective(x) -> Remediable(x))\nforall x (Effective(x) and Remediable(x) -> Grassy(x))\nSexy(vivie) and Remediable(vivie) -> Grassy(vivie)\nforall x (Remediable(x) -> Autarkic(x))\n\nnot Sees(vivie, vivie)\n\nnot Sees(vivie, vivie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "The karoline is boxed. The karoline is sable. The karoline is uniate. If someone is boxed then they are concealing. If the karoline is received and the karoline is concealing then the karoline is sable. Green people are received. All concealing, received people are boxed. If the karoline is sable and the karoline is received then the karoline is boxed. All received people are uniate. The karoline visits the karoline.", "logic": "\nBoxed(karoline)\nSable(karoline)\nUniate(karoline)\nforall x (Boxed(x) -> Concealing(x))\nReceived(karoline) and Concealing(karoline) -> Sable(karoline)\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Received(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) and Received(x) -> Boxed(x))\nSable(karoline) and Received(karoline) -> Boxed(karoline)\nforall x (Received(x) -> Uniate(x))\n\nVisits(karoline, karoline)\n\nVisits(karoline, karoline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2168"} {"premises": "Cathe is mozartean. Farley is dimorphous. Alice is strenuous. Nice people are homostyled. All dimorphous people are tedious. Farley is dimorphous.", "logic": "\nMozartean(cathe)\nDimorphous(farley)\nStrenuous(alice)\nforall x (Tedious(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nforall x (Dimorphous(x) -> Tedious(x))\n\nDimorphous(farley)\n\ntherefore Dimorphous(farley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Mada is ablaze. Garvin is miserly. Robbert is winless. Nice people are utmost. All miserly people are unlisted. Mada is not ablaze.", "logic": "\nAblaze(mada)\nMiserly(garvin)\nWinless(robbert)\nforall x (Unlisted(x) -> Utmost(x))\nforall x (Miserly(x) -> Unlisted(x))\n\nnot Ablaze(mada)\n\ntherefore Ablaze(mada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Devonna is silken. Sherri is respectful. Jennette is unionised. Nice people are syrian. All respectful people are dextrous. Sherri is dextrous.", "logic": "\nSilken(devonna)\nRespectful(sherri)\nUnionised(jennette)\nforall x (Dextrous(x) -> Syrian(x))\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> Dextrous(x))\n\nDextrous(sherri)\n\nRespectful(sherri) and forall x (Respectful(x) -> Dextrous(x)) -> therefore Dextrous(sherri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Ashby is protozoan. Wynne is lone. Baldwin is semiformal. Nice people are sole. All lone people are uniformed. Wynne is not uniformed.", "logic": "\nProtozoan(ashby)\nLone(wynne)\nSemiformal(baldwin)\nforall x (Uniformed(x) -> Sole(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Uniformed(x))\n\nnot Uniformed(wynne)\n\nLone(wynne) and forall x (Lone(x) -> Uniformed(x)) -> therefore Uniformed(wynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Cathryn is analogue. Amalia is indefinite. Ladonna is puppyish. Nice people are unsightly. All indefinite people are defoliate. Amalia is unsightly.", "logic": "\nAnalogue(cathryn)\nIndefinite(amalia)\nPuppyish(ladonna)\nforall x (Defoliate(x) -> Unsightly(x))\nforall x (Indefinite(x) -> Defoliate(x))\n\nUnsightly(amalia)\n\nIndefinite(amalia) and forall x (Indefinite(x) -> Defoliate(x)) -> therefore Defoliate(amalia) Defoliate(amalia) and forall x (Defoliate(x) -> Unsightly(x)) -> therefore Unsightly(amalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Florry is septate. Florenza is statuary. Cornela is portly. Nice people are unfruitful. All statuary people are swept. Florenza is not unfruitful.", "logic": "\nSeptate(florry)\nStatuary(florenza)\nPortly(cornela)\nforall x (Swept(x) -> Unfruitful(x))\nforall x (Statuary(x) -> Swept(x))\n\nnot Unfruitful(florenza)\n\nStatuary(florenza) and forall x (Statuary(x) -> Swept(x)) -> therefore Swept(florenza) Swept(florenza) and forall x (Swept(x) -> Unfruitful(x)) -> therefore Unfruitful(florenza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Juliann is narrative. Marilu is gleeful. Coraline is methylated. Nice people are unsorted. All gleeful people are fiberoptic. Coraline is not unsorted.", "logic": "\nNarrative(juliann)\nGleeful(marilu)\nMethylated(coraline)\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) -> Unsorted(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Fiberoptic(x))\n\nnot Unsorted(coraline)\n\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) -> Unsorted(x)) <- forall x (Gleeful(x) -> Fiberoptic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Aurea is puppyish. Roobbie is unsullied. Will is raptorial. Nice people are gummy. All unsullied people are regulatory. Aurea is gummy.", "logic": "\nPuppyish(aurea)\nUnsullied(roobbie)\nRaptorial(will)\nforall x (Regulatory(x) -> Gummy(x))\nforall x (Unsullied(x) -> Regulatory(x))\n\nGummy(aurea)\n\nforall x (Regulatory(x) -> Gummy(x)) <- forall x (Unsullied(x) -> Regulatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Roselin is mammoth. Bridie is epideictic. Hephzibah is curatorial. Nice people are undesirous. All epideictic people are calculable. Roselin is not calculable.", "logic": "\nMammoth(roselin)\nEpideictic(bridie)\nCuratorial(hephzibah)\nforall x (Calculable(x) -> Undesirous(x))\nforall x (Epideictic(x) -> Calculable(x))\n\nnot Calculable(roselin)\n\nforall x (Epideictic(x) -> Calculable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Elfie is temporal. Cyrill is nurtural. Fleur is aggressive. Nice people are divisional. All nurtural people are bullate. Elfie is aggressive.", "logic": "\nTemporal(elfie)\nNurtural(cyrill)\nAggressive(fleur)\nforall x (Bullate(x) -> Divisional(x))\nforall x (Nurtural(x) -> Bullate(x))\n\nAggressive(elfie)\n\nAggressive(elfie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Stearne is unmoving. Rickey is transfixed. Zalman is exceeding. Nice people are precative. All transfixed people are fastened. Rickey is not unmoving.", "logic": "\nUnmoving(stearne)\nTransfixed(rickey)\nExceeding(zalman)\nforall x (Fastened(x) -> Precative(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> Fastened(x))\n\nnot Unmoving(rickey)\n\nnot Unmoving(rickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "Prudi is delphic. Brigid is inexplicit. Norman is clastic. Nice people are geological. All inexplicit people are frowzled. Norman is blue.", "logic": "\nDelphic(prudi)\nInexplicit(brigid)\nClastic(norman)\nforall x (Frowzled(x) -> Geological(x))\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) -> Frowzled(x))\n\nBlue(norman)\n\nBlue(norman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-278"} {"premises": "The erinna liaise the lacee. The erinna is sigmoid. The erinna correlate the ashby. The erinna correlate the lacee. The erinna undershoot the ashby. The ashby liaise the lacee. The ashby is repayable. The ashby is sigmoid. The ashby correlate the lacee. The lacee liaise the erinna. The lacee liaise the ashby. The lacee undershoot the ashby. If someone liaise the erinna then the erinna undershoot the lacee. If someone is diverse and limacoid then they like the ashby. If someone is sigmoid and they chase the ashby then they chase the erinna. If the lacee correlate the erinna and the erinna is ligneous then the erinna liaise the ashby. If the ashby liaise the lacee then the ashby is repayable. If someone is repayable and sigmoid then they chase the ashby. If the ashby correlate the lacee then the lacee is ligneous. If the erinna is sigmoid then the erinna is repayable. The erinna is sigmoid.", "logic": "\nLiaise(erinna, lacee)\nSigmoid(erinna)\nCorrelate(erinna, ashby)\nCorrelate(erinna, lacee)\nUndershoot(erinna, ashby)\nLiaise(ashby, lacee)\nRepayable(ashby)\nSigmoid(ashby)\nCorrelate(ashby, lacee)\nLiaise(lacee, erinna)\nLiaise(lacee, ashby)\nUndershoot(lacee, ashby)\nforall x (Liaise(x, erinna) -> Undershoot(erinna, lacee))\nforall x (Diverse(x) and Limacoid(x) -> Correlate(x, ashby))\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) and Liaise(x, ashby) -> Liaise(x, erinna))\nCorrelate(lacee, erinna) and Ligneous(erinna) -> Liaise(erinna, ashby)\nLiaise(ashby, lacee) -> Repayable(ashby)\nforall x (Repayable(x) and Sigmoid(x) -> Liaise(x, ashby))\nCorrelate(ashby, lacee) -> Ligneous(lacee)\nSigmoid(erinna) -> Repayable(erinna)\n\nSigmoid(erinna)\n\ntherefore Sigmoid(erinna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The cam fine the grady. The cam is jeering. The cam dive the worth. The cam dive the grady. The cam intubate the worth. The worth fine the grady. The worth is roving. The worth is jeering. The worth dive the grady. The grady fine the cam. The grady fine the worth. The grady intubate the worth. If someone fine the cam then the cam intubate the grady. If someone is tamed and unclipped then they like the worth. If someone is jeering and they chase the worth then they chase the cam. If the grady dive the cam and the cam is backstage then the cam fine the worth. If the worth fine the grady then the worth is roving. If someone is roving and jeering then they chase the worth. If the worth dive the grady then the grady is backstage. If the cam is jeering then the cam is roving. The cam does not see the worth.", "logic": "\nFine(cam, grady)\nJeering(cam)\nDive(cam, worth)\nDive(cam, grady)\nIntubate(cam, worth)\nFine(worth, grady)\nRoving(worth)\nJeering(worth)\nDive(worth, grady)\nFine(grady, cam)\nFine(grady, worth)\nIntubate(grady, worth)\nforall x (Fine(x, cam) -> Intubate(cam, grady))\nforall x (Tamed(x) and Unclipped(x) -> Dive(x, worth))\nforall x (Jeering(x) and Fine(x, worth) -> Fine(x, cam))\nDive(grady, cam) and Backstage(cam) -> Fine(cam, worth)\nFine(worth, grady) -> Roving(worth)\nforall x (Roving(x) and Jeering(x) -> Fine(x, worth))\nDive(worth, grady) -> Backstage(grady)\nJeering(cam) -> Roving(cam)\n\nnot Intubate(cam, worth)\n\ntherefore Intubate(cam, worth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The minnie plat the amelina. The minnie is venomed. The minnie twin the pearline. The minnie twin the amelina. The minnie decolorize the pearline. The pearline plat the amelina. The pearline is combed. The pearline is venomed. The pearline twin the amelina. The amelina plat the minnie. The amelina plat the pearline. The amelina decolorize the pearline. If someone plat the minnie then the minnie decolorize the amelina. If someone is shitty and violative then they like the pearline. If someone is venomed and they chase the pearline then they chase the minnie. If the amelina twin the minnie and the minnie is naming then the minnie plat the pearline. If the pearline plat the amelina then the pearline is combed. If someone is combed and venomed then they chase the pearline. If the pearline twin the amelina then the amelina is naming. If the minnie is venomed then the minnie is combed. The minnie decolorize the amelina.", "logic": "\nPlat(minnie, amelina)\nVenomed(minnie)\nTwin(minnie, pearline)\nTwin(minnie, amelina)\nDecolorize(minnie, pearline)\nPlat(pearline, amelina)\nCombed(pearline)\nVenomed(pearline)\nTwin(pearline, amelina)\nPlat(amelina, minnie)\nPlat(amelina, pearline)\nDecolorize(amelina, pearline)\nforall x (Plat(x, minnie) -> Decolorize(minnie, amelina))\nforall x (Shitty(x) and Violative(x) -> Twin(x, pearline))\nforall x (Venomed(x) and Plat(x, pearline) -> Plat(x, minnie))\nTwin(amelina, minnie) and Naming(minnie) -> Plat(minnie, pearline)\nPlat(pearline, amelina) -> Combed(pearline)\nforall x (Combed(x) and Venomed(x) -> Plat(x, pearline))\nTwin(pearline, amelina) -> Naming(amelina)\nVenomed(minnie) -> Combed(minnie)\n\nDecolorize(minnie, amelina)\n\nPlat(amelina, minnie) and forall x (Plat(x, minnie) -> Decolorize(minnie, amelina)) -> therefore Decolorize(minnie, amelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The andreas revert the esme. The andreas is glowering. The andreas scribe the myrle. The andreas scribe the esme. The andreas scribble the myrle. The myrle revert the esme. The myrle is onerous. The myrle is glowering. The myrle scribe the esme. The esme revert the andreas. The esme revert the myrle. The esme scribble the myrle. If someone revert the andreas then the andreas scribble the esme. If someone is aground and blatant then they like the myrle. If someone is glowering and they chase the myrle then they chase the andreas. If the esme scribe the andreas and the andreas is fulgurous then the andreas revert the myrle. If the myrle revert the esme then the myrle is onerous. If someone is onerous and glowering then they chase the myrle. If the myrle scribe the esme then the esme is fulgurous. If the andreas is glowering then the andreas is onerous. The myrle does not chase the myrle.", "logic": "\nRevert(andreas, esme)\nGlowering(andreas)\nScribe(andreas, myrle)\nScribe(andreas, esme)\nScribble(andreas, myrle)\nRevert(myrle, esme)\nOnerous(myrle)\nGlowering(myrle)\nScribe(myrle, esme)\nRevert(esme, andreas)\nRevert(esme, myrle)\nScribble(esme, myrle)\nforall x (Revert(x, andreas) -> Scribble(andreas, esme))\nforall x (Aground(x) and Blatant(x) -> Scribe(x, myrle))\nforall x (Glowering(x) and Revert(x, myrle) -> Revert(x, andreas))\nScribe(esme, andreas) and Fulgurous(andreas) -> Revert(andreas, myrle)\nRevert(myrle, esme) -> Onerous(myrle)\nforall x (Onerous(x) and Glowering(x) -> Revert(x, myrle))\nScribe(myrle, esme) -> Fulgurous(esme)\nGlowering(andreas) -> Onerous(andreas)\n\nnot Revert(myrle, myrle)\n\nOnerous(myrle) and Glowering(myrle) and forall x (Onerous(x) and Glowering(x) -> Revert(x, myrle)) -> therefore Revert(myrle, myrle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The nanice direct the lemuel. The nanice is vegetal. The nanice sloganeer the crissie. The nanice sloganeer the lemuel. The nanice tool the crissie. The crissie direct the lemuel. The crissie is blameless. The crissie is vegetal. The crissie sloganeer the lemuel. The lemuel direct the nanice. The lemuel direct the crissie. The lemuel tool the crissie. If someone direct the nanice then the nanice tool the lemuel. If someone is mortgaged and falconine then they like the crissie. If someone is vegetal and they chase the crissie then they chase the nanice. If the lemuel sloganeer the nanice and the nanice is wanton then the nanice direct the crissie. If the crissie direct the lemuel then the crissie is blameless. If someone is blameless and vegetal then they chase the crissie. If the crissie sloganeer the lemuel then the lemuel is wanton. If the nanice is vegetal then the nanice is blameless. The nanice direct the crissie.", "logic": "\nDirect(nanice, lemuel)\nVegetal(nanice)\nSloganeer(nanice, crissie)\nSloganeer(nanice, lemuel)\nTool(nanice, crissie)\nDirect(crissie, lemuel)\nBlameless(crissie)\nVegetal(crissie)\nSloganeer(crissie, lemuel)\nDirect(lemuel, nanice)\nDirect(lemuel, crissie)\nTool(lemuel, crissie)\nforall x (Direct(x, nanice) -> Tool(nanice, lemuel))\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) and Falconine(x) -> Sloganeer(x, crissie))\nforall x (Vegetal(x) and Direct(x, crissie) -> Direct(x, nanice))\nSloganeer(lemuel, nanice) and Wanton(nanice) -> Direct(nanice, crissie)\nDirect(crissie, lemuel) -> Blameless(crissie)\nforall x (Blameless(x) and Vegetal(x) -> Direct(x, crissie))\nSloganeer(crissie, lemuel) -> Wanton(lemuel)\nVegetal(nanice) -> Blameless(nanice)\n\nDirect(nanice, crissie)\n\nVegetal(nanice) and Vegetal(nanice) -> Blameless(nanice) -> therefore Blameless(nanice) Blameless(nanice) and Vegetal(nanice) and forall x (Blameless(x) and Vegetal(x) -> Direct(x, crissie)) -> therefore Direct(nanice, crissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The jasmine mummify the paule. The jasmine is slav. The jasmine wear the riane. The jasmine wear the paule. The jasmine sunburn the riane. The riane mummify the paule. The riane is triune. The riane is slav. The riane wear the paule. The paule mummify the jasmine. The paule mummify the riane. The paule sunburn the riane. If someone mummify the jasmine then the jasmine sunburn the paule. If someone is scriptural and wobbly then they like the riane. If someone is slav and they chase the riane then they chase the jasmine. If the paule wear the jasmine and the jasmine is veracious then the jasmine mummify the riane. If the riane mummify the paule then the riane is triune. If someone is triune and slav then they chase the riane. If the riane wear the paule then the paule is veracious. If the jasmine is slav then the jasmine is triune. The riane does not chase the jasmine.", "logic": "\nMummify(jasmine, paule)\nSlav(jasmine)\nWear(jasmine, riane)\nWear(jasmine, paule)\nSunburn(jasmine, riane)\nMummify(riane, paule)\nTriune(riane)\nSlav(riane)\nWear(riane, paule)\nMummify(paule, jasmine)\nMummify(paule, riane)\nSunburn(paule, riane)\nforall x (Mummify(x, jasmine) -> Sunburn(jasmine, paule))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) and Wobbly(x) -> Wear(x, riane))\nforall x (Slav(x) and Mummify(x, riane) -> Mummify(x, jasmine))\nWear(paule, jasmine) and Veracious(jasmine) -> Mummify(jasmine, riane)\nMummify(riane, paule) -> Triune(riane)\nforall x (Triune(x) and Slav(x) -> Mummify(x, riane))\nWear(riane, paule) -> Veracious(paule)\nSlav(jasmine) -> Triune(jasmine)\n\nnot Mummify(riane, jasmine)\n\nTriune(riane) and Slav(riane) and forall x (Triune(x) and Slav(x) -> Mummify(x, riane)) -> therefore Mummify(riane, riane) Slav(riane) and Mummify(riane, riane) and forall x (Slav(x) and Mummify(x, riane) -> Mummify(x, jasmine)) -> therefore Mummify(riane, jasmine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The wilie tenderise the dafna. The wilie is gelded. The wilie indite the karena. The wilie indite the dafna. The wilie turtle the karena. The karena tenderise the dafna. The karena is discovered. The karena is gelded. The karena indite the dafna. The dafna tenderise the wilie. The dafna tenderise the karena. The dafna turtle the karena. If someone tenderise the wilie then the wilie turtle the dafna. If someone is elemental and xxxiv then they like the karena. If someone is gelded and they chase the karena then they chase the wilie. If the dafna indite the wilie and the wilie is unabated then the wilie tenderise the karena. If the karena tenderise the dafna then the karena is discovered. If someone is discovered and gelded then they chase the karena. If the karena indite the dafna then the dafna is unabated. If the wilie is gelded then the wilie is discovered. The karena does not like the karena.", "logic": "\nTenderise(wilie, dafna)\nGelded(wilie)\nIndite(wilie, karena)\nIndite(wilie, dafna)\nTurtle(wilie, karena)\nTenderise(karena, dafna)\nDiscovered(karena)\nGelded(karena)\nIndite(karena, dafna)\nTenderise(dafna, wilie)\nTenderise(dafna, karena)\nTurtle(dafna, karena)\nforall x (Tenderise(x, wilie) -> Turtle(wilie, dafna))\nforall x (Elemental(x) and Xxxiv(x) -> Indite(x, karena))\nforall x (Gelded(x) and Tenderise(x, karena) -> Tenderise(x, wilie))\nIndite(dafna, wilie) and Unabated(wilie) -> Tenderise(wilie, karena)\nTenderise(karena, dafna) -> Discovered(karena)\nforall x (Discovered(x) and Gelded(x) -> Tenderise(x, karena))\nIndite(karena, dafna) -> Unabated(dafna)\nGelded(wilie) -> Discovered(wilie)\n\nnot Indite(karena, karena)\n\nforall x (Elemental(x) and Xxxiv(x) -> Indite(x, karena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The taddeus digest the doralynn. The taddeus is phony. The taddeus sled the astra. The taddeus sled the doralynn. The taddeus disgust the astra. The astra digest the doralynn. The astra is venomous. The astra is phony. The astra sled the doralynn. The doralynn digest the taddeus. The doralynn digest the astra. The doralynn disgust the astra. If someone digest the taddeus then the taddeus disgust the doralynn. If someone is retrograde and estrous then they like the astra. If someone is phony and they chase the astra then they chase the taddeus. If the doralynn sled the taddeus and the taddeus is apsidal then the taddeus digest the astra. If the astra digest the doralynn then the astra is venomous. If someone is venomous and phony then they chase the astra. If the astra sled the doralynn then the doralynn is apsidal. If the taddeus is phony then the taddeus is venomous. The doralynn sled the astra.", "logic": "\nDigest(taddeus, doralynn)\nPhony(taddeus)\nSled(taddeus, astra)\nSled(taddeus, doralynn)\nDisgust(taddeus, astra)\nDigest(astra, doralynn)\nVenomous(astra)\nPhony(astra)\nSled(astra, doralynn)\nDigest(doralynn, taddeus)\nDigest(doralynn, astra)\nDisgust(doralynn, astra)\nforall x (Digest(x, taddeus) -> Disgust(taddeus, doralynn))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) and Estrous(x) -> Sled(x, astra))\nforall x (Phony(x) and Digest(x, astra) -> Digest(x, taddeus))\nSled(doralynn, taddeus) and Apsidal(taddeus) -> Digest(taddeus, astra)\nDigest(astra, doralynn) -> Venomous(astra)\nforall x (Venomous(x) and Phony(x) -> Digest(x, astra))\nSled(astra, doralynn) -> Apsidal(doralynn)\nPhony(taddeus) -> Venomous(taddeus)\n\nSled(doralynn, astra)\n\nforall x (Retrograde(x) and Estrous(x) -> Sled(x, astra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The carley reforest the churchill. The carley is credited. The carley delimit the bogdan. The carley delimit the churchill. The carley embitter the bogdan. The bogdan reforest the churchill. The bogdan is buddhist. The bogdan is credited. The bogdan delimit the churchill. The churchill reforest the carley. The churchill reforest the bogdan. The churchill embitter the bogdan. If someone reforest the carley then the carley embitter the churchill. If someone is centenary and plumbic then they like the bogdan. If someone is credited and they chase the bogdan then they chase the carley. If the churchill delimit the carley and the carley is tempered then the carley reforest the bogdan. If the bogdan reforest the churchill then the bogdan is buddhist. If someone is buddhist and credited then they chase the bogdan. If the bogdan delimit the churchill then the churchill is tempered. If the carley is credited then the carley is buddhist. The bogdan does not like the carley.", "logic": "\nReforest(carley, churchill)\nCredited(carley)\nDelimit(carley, bogdan)\nDelimit(carley, churchill)\nEmbitter(carley, bogdan)\nReforest(bogdan, churchill)\nBuddhist(bogdan)\nCredited(bogdan)\nDelimit(bogdan, churchill)\nReforest(churchill, carley)\nReforest(churchill, bogdan)\nEmbitter(churchill, bogdan)\nforall x (Reforest(x, carley) -> Embitter(carley, churchill))\nforall x (Centenary(x) and Plumbic(x) -> Delimit(x, bogdan))\nforall x (Credited(x) and Reforest(x, bogdan) -> Reforest(x, carley))\nDelimit(churchill, carley) and Tempered(carley) -> Reforest(carley, bogdan)\nReforest(bogdan, churchill) -> Buddhist(bogdan)\nforall x (Buddhist(x) and Credited(x) -> Reforest(x, bogdan))\nDelimit(bogdan, churchill) -> Tempered(churchill)\nCredited(carley) -> Buddhist(carley)\n\nnot Delimit(bogdan, carley)\n\nnot Delimit(bogdan, carley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The querida vilify the meryl. The querida is segmented. The querida streak the kyle. The querida streak the meryl. The querida infest the kyle. The kyle vilify the meryl. The kyle is allegro. The kyle is segmented. The kyle streak the meryl. The meryl vilify the querida. The meryl vilify the kyle. The meryl infest the kyle. If someone vilify the querida then the querida infest the meryl. If someone is luminous and wanted then they like the kyle. If someone is segmented and they chase the kyle then they chase the querida. If the meryl streak the querida and the querida is porose then the querida vilify the kyle. If the kyle vilify the meryl then the kyle is allegro. If someone is allegro and segmented then they chase the kyle. If the kyle streak the meryl then the meryl is porose. If the querida is segmented then the querida is allegro. The meryl is segmented.", "logic": "\nVilify(querida, meryl)\nSegmented(querida)\nStreak(querida, kyle)\nStreak(querida, meryl)\nInfest(querida, kyle)\nVilify(kyle, meryl)\nAllegro(kyle)\nSegmented(kyle)\nStreak(kyle, meryl)\nVilify(meryl, querida)\nVilify(meryl, kyle)\nInfest(meryl, kyle)\nforall x (Vilify(x, querida) -> Infest(querida, meryl))\nforall x (Luminous(x) and Wanted(x) -> Streak(x, kyle))\nforall x (Segmented(x) and Vilify(x, kyle) -> Vilify(x, querida))\nStreak(meryl, querida) and Porose(querida) -> Vilify(querida, kyle)\nVilify(kyle, meryl) -> Allegro(kyle)\nforall x (Allegro(x) and Segmented(x) -> Vilify(x, kyle))\nStreak(kyle, meryl) -> Porose(meryl)\nSegmented(querida) -> Allegro(querida)\n\nSegmented(meryl)\n\nSegmented(meryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The rolf gazump the goldarina. The rolf is side. The rolf felicitate the aida. The rolf felicitate the goldarina. The rolf find the aida. The aida gazump the goldarina. The aida is dateless. The aida is side. The aida felicitate the goldarina. The goldarina gazump the rolf. The goldarina gazump the aida. The goldarina find the aida. If someone gazump the rolf then the rolf find the goldarina. If someone is assentient and cycloid then they like the aida. If someone is side and they chase the aida then they chase the rolf. If the goldarina felicitate the rolf and the rolf is fulgurant then the rolf gazump the aida. If the aida gazump the goldarina then the aida is dateless. If someone is dateless and side then they chase the aida. If the aida felicitate the goldarina then the goldarina is fulgurant. If the rolf is side then the rolf is dateless. The goldarina is not assentient.", "logic": "\nGazump(rolf, goldarina)\nSide(rolf)\nFelicitate(rolf, aida)\nFelicitate(rolf, goldarina)\nFind(rolf, aida)\nGazump(aida, goldarina)\nDateless(aida)\nSide(aida)\nFelicitate(aida, goldarina)\nGazump(goldarina, rolf)\nGazump(goldarina, aida)\nFind(goldarina, aida)\nforall x (Gazump(x, rolf) -> Find(rolf, goldarina))\nforall x (Assentient(x) and Cycloid(x) -> Felicitate(x, aida))\nforall x (Side(x) and Gazump(x, aida) -> Gazump(x, rolf))\nFelicitate(goldarina, rolf) and Fulgurant(rolf) -> Gazump(rolf, aida)\nGazump(aida, goldarina) -> Dateless(aida)\nforall x (Dateless(x) and Side(x) -> Gazump(x, aida))\nFelicitate(aida, goldarina) -> Fulgurant(goldarina)\nSide(rolf) -> Dateless(rolf)\n\nnot Assentient(goldarina)\n\nnot Assentient(goldarina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "The ariadne inspire the hillard. The ariadne is elapsed. The ariadne rally the didi. The ariadne rally the hillard. The ariadne desert the didi. The didi inspire the hillard. The didi is arresting. The didi is elapsed. The didi rally the hillard. The hillard inspire the ariadne. The hillard inspire the didi. The hillard desert the didi. If someone inspire the ariadne then the ariadne desert the hillard. If someone is untempered and plaguey then they like the didi. If someone is elapsed and they chase the didi then they chase the ariadne. If the hillard rally the ariadne and the ariadne is evident then the ariadne inspire the didi. If the didi inspire the hillard then the didi is arresting. If someone is arresting and elapsed then they chase the didi. If the didi rally the hillard then the hillard is evident. If the ariadne is elapsed then the ariadne is arresting. The didi is untempered.", "logic": "\nInspire(ariadne, hillard)\nElapsed(ariadne)\nRally(ariadne, didi)\nRally(ariadne, hillard)\nDesert(ariadne, didi)\nInspire(didi, hillard)\nArresting(didi)\nElapsed(didi)\nRally(didi, hillard)\nInspire(hillard, ariadne)\nInspire(hillard, didi)\nDesert(hillard, didi)\nforall x (Inspire(x, ariadne) -> Desert(ariadne, hillard))\nforall x (Untempered(x) and Plaguey(x) -> Rally(x, didi))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Inspire(x, didi) -> Inspire(x, ariadne))\nRally(hillard, ariadne) and Evident(ariadne) -> Inspire(ariadne, didi)\nInspire(didi, hillard) -> Arresting(didi)\nforall x (Arresting(x) and Elapsed(x) -> Inspire(x, didi))\nRally(didi, hillard) -> Evident(hillard)\nElapsed(ariadne) -> Arresting(ariadne)\n\nUntempered(didi)\n\nUntempered(didi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1665"} {"premises": "Nichol is outlined. Nichol is puzzled. Nichol is interbred. Nichol is robed. Saxon is outlined. Saxon is puzzled. Saxon is interbred. Thomas is zenithal. Thomas is puzzled. Thomas is parotid. If someone is goddam then they are robed. If Saxon is puzzled then Saxon is parotid. All puzzled people are goddam. Nichol is interbred.", "logic": "\nOutlined(nichol)\nPuzzled(nichol)\nInterbred(nichol)\nRobed(nichol)\nOutlined(saxon)\nPuzzled(saxon)\nInterbred(saxon)\nZenithal(thomas)\nPuzzled(thomas)\nParotid(thomas)\nforall x (Goddam(x) -> Robed(x))\nPuzzled(saxon) -> Parotid(saxon)\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Goddam(x))\n\nInterbred(nichol)\n\ntherefore Interbred(nichol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Zary is acapnic. Zary is brushlike. Zary is incursive. Zary is tall. Odessa is acapnic. Odessa is brushlike. Odessa is incursive. Lorry is etiologic. Lorry is brushlike. Lorry is inclusive. If someone is cottony then they are tall. If Odessa is brushlike then Odessa is inclusive. All brushlike people are cottony. Lorry is not inclusive.", "logic": "\nAcapnic(zary)\nBrushlike(zary)\nIncursive(zary)\nTall(zary)\nAcapnic(odessa)\nBrushlike(odessa)\nIncursive(odessa)\nEtiologic(lorry)\nBrushlike(lorry)\nInclusive(lorry)\nforall x (Cottony(x) -> Tall(x))\nBrushlike(odessa) -> Inclusive(odessa)\nforall x (Brushlike(x) -> Cottony(x))\n\nnot Inclusive(lorry)\n\ntherefore Inclusive(lorry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Lorine is chilly. Lorine is ordinary. Lorine is pussy. Lorine is reduced. Rickie is chilly. Rickie is ordinary. Rickie is pussy. Andra is biting. Andra is ordinary. Andra is botanic. If someone is leaning then they are reduced. If Rickie is ordinary then Rickie is botanic. All ordinary people are leaning. Andra is leaning.", "logic": "\nChilly(lorine)\nOrdinary(lorine)\nPussy(lorine)\nReduced(lorine)\nChilly(rickie)\nOrdinary(rickie)\nPussy(rickie)\nBiting(andra)\nOrdinary(andra)\nBotanic(andra)\nforall x (Leaning(x) -> Reduced(x))\nOrdinary(rickie) -> Botanic(rickie)\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> Leaning(x))\n\nLeaning(andra)\n\nOrdinary(andra) and forall x (Ordinary(x) -> Leaning(x)) -> therefore Leaning(andra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Henrietta is dietetic. Henrietta is undeterred. Henrietta is untempting. Henrietta is tuppeny. Solange is dietetic. Solange is undeterred. Solange is untempting. Ranee is upcoming. Ranee is undeterred. Ranee is spoiled. If someone is recursive then they are tuppeny. If Solange is undeterred then Solange is spoiled. All undeterred people are recursive. Solange is not spoiled.", "logic": "\nDietetic(henrietta)\nUndeterred(henrietta)\nUntempting(henrietta)\nTuppeny(henrietta)\nDietetic(solange)\nUndeterred(solange)\nUntempting(solange)\nUpcoming(ranee)\nUndeterred(ranee)\nSpoiled(ranee)\nforall x (Recursive(x) -> Tuppeny(x))\nUndeterred(solange) -> Spoiled(solange)\nforall x (Undeterred(x) -> Recursive(x))\n\nnot Spoiled(solange)\n\nUndeterred(solange) and Undeterred(solange) -> Spoiled(solange) -> therefore Spoiled(solange)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Michelina is leadless. Michelina is corrective. Michelina is unwanted. Michelina is pally. Leonid is leadless. Leonid is corrective. Leonid is unwanted. Ham is slighting. Ham is corrective. Ham is fanlike. If someone is consenting then they are pally. If Leonid is corrective then Leonid is fanlike. All corrective people are consenting. Leonid is pally.", "logic": "\nLeadless(michelina)\nCorrective(michelina)\nUnwanted(michelina)\nPally(michelina)\nLeadless(leonid)\nCorrective(leonid)\nUnwanted(leonid)\nSlighting(ham)\nCorrective(ham)\nFanlike(ham)\nforall x (Consenting(x) -> Pally(x))\nCorrective(leonid) -> Fanlike(leonid)\nforall x (Corrective(x) -> Consenting(x))\n\nPally(leonid)\n\nCorrective(leonid) and forall x (Corrective(x) -> Consenting(x)) -> therefore Consenting(leonid) Consenting(leonid) and forall x (Consenting(x) -> Pally(x)) -> therefore Pally(leonid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Jonathon is softish. Jonathon is heatable. Jonathon is ambiguous. Jonathon is mousey. Chastity is softish. Chastity is heatable. Chastity is ambiguous. Camilla is carinated. Camilla is heatable. Camilla is vibratory. If someone is acquainted then they are mousey. If Chastity is heatable then Chastity is vibratory. All heatable people are acquainted. Camilla is not mousey.", "logic": "\nSoftish(jonathon)\nHeatable(jonathon)\nAmbiguous(jonathon)\nMousey(jonathon)\nSoftish(chastity)\nHeatable(chastity)\nAmbiguous(chastity)\nCarinated(camilla)\nHeatable(camilla)\nVibratory(camilla)\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> Mousey(x))\nHeatable(chastity) -> Vibratory(chastity)\nforall x (Heatable(x) -> Acquainted(x))\n\nnot Mousey(camilla)\n\nHeatable(camilla) and forall x (Heatable(x) -> Acquainted(x)) -> therefore Acquainted(camilla) Acquainted(camilla) and forall x (Acquainted(x) -> Mousey(x)) -> therefore Mousey(camilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Marietta is jacksonian. Marietta is textured. Marietta is voluptuous. Marietta is yellowed. Antone is jacksonian. Antone is textured. Antone is voluptuous. Davie is unworthy. Davie is textured. Davie is adjective. If someone is lxxii then they are yellowed. If Antone is textured then Antone is adjective. All textured people are lxxii. Davie is not jacksonian.", "logic": "\nJacksonian(marietta)\nTextured(marietta)\nVoluptuous(marietta)\nYellowed(marietta)\nJacksonian(antone)\nTextured(antone)\nVoluptuous(antone)\nUnworthy(davie)\nTextured(davie)\nAdjective(davie)\nforall x (Lxxii(x) -> Yellowed(x))\nTextured(antone) -> Adjective(antone)\nforall x (Textured(x) -> Lxxii(x))\n\nnot Jacksonian(davie)\n\nnot Jacksonian(davie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Babette is autarkic. Babette is picky. Babette is onetime. Babette is hortatory. Shara is autarkic. Shara is picky. Shara is onetime. Nessy is perverse. Nessy is picky. Nessy is dwindling. If someone is voltarean then they are hortatory. If Shara is picky then Shara is dwindling. All picky people are voltarean. Shara is perverse.", "logic": "\nAutarkic(babette)\nPicky(babette)\nOnetime(babette)\nHortatory(babette)\nAutarkic(shara)\nPicky(shara)\nOnetime(shara)\nPerverse(nessy)\nPicky(nessy)\nDwindling(nessy)\nforall x (Voltarean(x) -> Hortatory(x))\nPicky(shara) -> Dwindling(shara)\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Voltarean(x))\n\nPerverse(shara)\n\nPerverse(shara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Hermy is choosy. Hermy is blustering. Hermy is sinkable. Hermy is steaming. Maria is choosy. Maria is blustering. Maria is sinkable. Rudy is beginning. Rudy is blustering. Rudy is violet. If someone is trancelike then they are steaming. If Maria is blustering then Maria is violet. All blustering people are trancelike. Rudy is not sinkable.", "logic": "\nChoosy(hermy)\nBlustering(hermy)\nSinkable(hermy)\nSteaming(hermy)\nChoosy(maria)\nBlustering(maria)\nSinkable(maria)\nBeginning(rudy)\nBlustering(rudy)\nViolet(rudy)\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Steaming(x))\nBlustering(maria) -> Violet(maria)\nforall x (Blustering(x) -> Trancelike(x))\n\nnot Sinkable(rudy)\n\nnot Sinkable(rudy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "Orly is accredited. Orly is botched. Orly is delusive. Orly is raging. Ebba is accredited. Ebba is botched. Ebba is delusive. Marni is sold. Marni is botched. Marni is emboldened. If someone is meridian then they are raging. If Ebba is botched then Ebba is emboldened. All botched people are meridian. Orly is sold.", "logic": "\nAccredited(orly)\nBotched(orly)\nDelusive(orly)\nRaging(orly)\nAccredited(ebba)\nBotched(ebba)\nDelusive(ebba)\nSold(marni)\nBotched(marni)\nEmboldened(marni)\nforall x (Meridian(x) -> Raging(x))\nBotched(ebba) -> Emboldened(ebba)\nforall x (Botched(x) -> Meridian(x))\n\nSold(orly)\n\nSold(orly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-670"} {"premises": "The herminia nurture the gunilla. The gunilla nurture the herminia. If the herminia is swedish then the herminia is provisory. If someone is swedish then they chase the herminia. If someone is provisory then they eat the gunilla. If someone thoriate the gunilla and the gunilla thoriate the herminia then the gunilla is swedish. If the gunilla nurture the herminia then the gunilla is swedish. If someone nurture the herminia and the herminia is swedish then the herminia is prevailing. The herminia nurture the gunilla.", "logic": "\nNurture(herminia, gunilla)\nNurture(gunilla, herminia)\nSwedish(herminia) -> Provisory(herminia)\nforall x (Swedish(x) -> Document(x, herminia))\nforall x (Provisory(x) -> Nurture(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Thoriate(x, gunilla) and Thoriate(gunilla, herminia) -> Swedish(gunilla))\nNurture(gunilla, herminia) -> Swedish(gunilla)\nforall x (Nurture(x, herminia) and Swedish(herminia) -> Prevailing(herminia))\n\nNurture(herminia, gunilla)\n\ntherefore Nurture(herminia, gunilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The vachel cook the janice. The janice cook the vachel. If the vachel is baffled then the vachel is indolent. If someone is baffled then they chase the vachel. If someone is indolent then they eat the janice. If someone pulverize the janice and the janice pulverize the vachel then the janice is baffled. If the janice cook the vachel then the janice is baffled. If someone cook the vachel and the vachel is baffled then the vachel is cuddlesome. The janice does not eat the vachel.", "logic": "\nCook(vachel, janice)\nCook(janice, vachel)\nBaffled(vachel) -> Indolent(vachel)\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Tender(x, vachel))\nforall x (Indolent(x) -> Cook(x, janice))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, janice) and Pulverize(janice, vachel) -> Baffled(janice))\nCook(janice, vachel) -> Baffled(janice)\nforall x (Cook(x, vachel) and Baffled(vachel) -> Cuddlesome(vachel))\n\nnot Cook(janice, vachel)\n\ntherefore Cook(janice, vachel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The bret finish the shalne. The shalne finish the bret. If the bret is personable then the bret is adorned. If someone is personable then they chase the bret. If someone is adorned then they eat the shalne. If someone aerosolise the shalne and the shalne aerosolise the bret then the shalne is personable. If the shalne finish the bret then the shalne is personable. If someone finish the bret and the bret is personable then the bret is abdominous. The shalne is personable.", "logic": "\nFinish(bret, shalne)\nFinish(shalne, bret)\nPersonable(bret) -> Adorned(bret)\nforall x (Personable(x) -> Acclaim(x, bret))\nforall x (Adorned(x) -> Finish(x, shalne))\nforall x (Aerosolise(x, shalne) and Aerosolise(shalne, bret) -> Personable(shalne))\nFinish(shalne, bret) -> Personable(shalne)\nforall x (Finish(x, bret) and Personable(bret) -> Abdominous(bret))\n\nPersonable(shalne)\n\nFinish(shalne, bret) and Finish(shalne, bret) -> Personable(shalne) -> therefore Personable(shalne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The barrett scratch the yaakov. The yaakov scratch the barrett. If the barrett is straggling then the barrett is calcific. If someone is straggling then they chase the barrett. If someone is calcific then they eat the yaakov. If someone cloture the yaakov and the yaakov cloture the barrett then the yaakov is straggling. If the yaakov scratch the barrett then the yaakov is straggling. If someone scratch the barrett and the barrett is straggling then the barrett is nigerien. The yaakov is not straggling.", "logic": "\nScratch(barrett, yaakov)\nScratch(yaakov, barrett)\nStraggling(barrett) -> Calcific(barrett)\nforall x (Straggling(x) -> Fumigate(x, barrett))\nforall x (Calcific(x) -> Scratch(x, yaakov))\nforall x (Cloture(x, yaakov) and Cloture(yaakov, barrett) -> Straggling(yaakov))\nScratch(yaakov, barrett) -> Straggling(yaakov)\nforall x (Scratch(x, barrett) and Straggling(barrett) -> Nigerien(barrett))\n\nnot Straggling(yaakov)\n\nScratch(yaakov, barrett) and Scratch(yaakov, barrett) -> Straggling(yaakov) -> therefore Straggling(yaakov)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The manon regain the wallache. The wallache regain the manon. If the manon is unlimited then the manon is embossed. If someone is unlimited then they chase the manon. If someone is embossed then they eat the wallache. If someone enunciate the wallache and the wallache enunciate the manon then the wallache is unlimited. If the wallache regain the manon then the wallache is unlimited. If someone regain the manon and the manon is unlimited then the manon is unofficial. The wallache enchain the manon.", "logic": "\nRegain(manon, wallache)\nRegain(wallache, manon)\nUnlimited(manon) -> Embossed(manon)\nforall x (Unlimited(x) -> Enchain(x, manon))\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Regain(x, wallache))\nforall x (Enunciate(x, wallache) and Enunciate(wallache, manon) -> Unlimited(wallache))\nRegain(wallache, manon) -> Unlimited(wallache)\nforall x (Regain(x, manon) and Unlimited(manon) -> Unofficial(manon))\n\nEnchain(wallache, manon)\n\nRegain(wallache, manon) and Regain(wallache, manon) -> Unlimited(wallache) -> therefore Unlimited(wallache) Unlimited(wallache) and forall x (Unlimited(x) -> Enchain(x, manon)) -> therefore Enchain(wallache, manon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The vincent tarry the tammi. The tammi tarry the vincent. If the vincent is wondrous then the vincent is unafraid. If someone is wondrous then they chase the vincent. If someone is unafraid then they eat the tammi. If someone damp the tammi and the tammi damp the vincent then the tammi is wondrous. If the tammi tarry the vincent then the tammi is wondrous. If someone tarry the vincent and the vincent is wondrous then the vincent is autophytic. The tammi does not chase the vincent.", "logic": "\nTarry(vincent, tammi)\nTarry(tammi, vincent)\nWondrous(vincent) -> Unafraid(vincent)\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Bemock(x, vincent))\nforall x (Unafraid(x) -> Tarry(x, tammi))\nforall x (Damp(x, tammi) and Damp(tammi, vincent) -> Wondrous(tammi))\nTarry(tammi, vincent) -> Wondrous(tammi)\nforall x (Tarry(x, vincent) and Wondrous(vincent) -> Autophytic(vincent))\n\nnot Bemock(tammi, vincent)\n\nTarry(tammi, vincent) and Tarry(tammi, vincent) -> Wondrous(tammi) -> therefore Wondrous(tammi) Wondrous(tammi) and forall x (Wondrous(x) -> Bemock(x, vincent)) -> therefore Bemock(tammi, vincent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The mellissa blindside the deloris. The deloris blindside the mellissa. If the mellissa is craven then the mellissa is self. If someone is craven then they chase the mellissa. If someone is self then they eat the deloris. If someone intrust the deloris and the deloris intrust the mellissa then the deloris is craven. If the deloris blindside the mellissa then the deloris is craven. If someone blindside the mellissa and the mellissa is craven then the mellissa is ecumenic. The deloris does not eat the deloris.", "logic": "\nBlindside(mellissa, deloris)\nBlindside(deloris, mellissa)\nCraven(mellissa) -> Self(mellissa)\nforall x (Craven(x) -> Zigzag(x, mellissa))\nforall x (Self(x) -> Blindside(x, deloris))\nforall x (Intrust(x, deloris) and Intrust(deloris, mellissa) -> Craven(deloris))\nBlindside(deloris, mellissa) -> Craven(deloris)\nforall x (Blindside(x, mellissa) and Craven(mellissa) -> Ecumenic(mellissa))\n\nnot Blindside(deloris, deloris)\n\nforall x (Self(x) -> Blindside(x, deloris)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The lucian burp the malanie. The malanie burp the lucian. If the lucian is simplex then the lucian is tottering. If someone is simplex then they chase the lucian. If someone is tottering then they eat the malanie. If someone vegetate the malanie and the malanie vegetate the lucian then the malanie is simplex. If the malanie burp the lucian then the malanie is simplex. If someone burp the lucian and the lucian is simplex then the lucian is ebracteate. The lucian is ebracteate.", "logic": "\nBurp(lucian, malanie)\nBurp(malanie, lucian)\nSimplex(lucian) -> Tottering(lucian)\nforall x (Simplex(x) -> Colly(x, lucian))\nforall x (Tottering(x) -> Burp(x, malanie))\nforall x (Vegetate(x, malanie) and Vegetate(malanie, lucian) -> Simplex(malanie))\nBurp(malanie, lucian) -> Simplex(malanie)\nforall x (Burp(x, lucian) and Simplex(lucian) -> Ebracteate(lucian))\n\nEbracteate(lucian)\n\nforall x (Burp(x, lucian) and Simplex(lucian) -> Ebracteate(lucian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The isa thread the ethelin. The ethelin thread the isa. If the isa is divorced then the isa is executable. If someone is divorced then they chase the isa. If someone is executable then they eat the ethelin. If someone lash the ethelin and the ethelin lash the isa then the ethelin is divorced. If the ethelin thread the isa then the ethelin is divorced. If someone thread the isa and the isa is divorced then the isa is seriocomic. The isa does not chase the isa.", "logic": "\nThread(isa, ethelin)\nThread(ethelin, isa)\nDivorced(isa) -> Executable(isa)\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Land(x, isa))\nforall x (Executable(x) -> Thread(x, ethelin))\nforall x (Lash(x, ethelin) and Lash(ethelin, isa) -> Divorced(ethelin))\nThread(ethelin, isa) -> Divorced(ethelin)\nforall x (Thread(x, isa) and Divorced(isa) -> Seriocomic(isa))\n\nnot Land(isa, isa)\n\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Land(x, isa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The farica mismarry the georgia. The georgia mismarry the farica. If the farica is tilled then the farica is homeless. If someone is tilled then they chase the farica. If someone is homeless then they eat the georgia. If someone astound the georgia and the georgia astound the farica then the georgia is tilled. If the georgia mismarry the farica then the georgia is tilled. If someone mismarry the farica and the farica is tilled then the farica is healing. The farica astound the farica.", "logic": "\nMismarry(farica, georgia)\nMismarry(georgia, farica)\nTilled(farica) -> Homeless(farica)\nforall x (Tilled(x) -> Cheque(x, farica))\nforall x (Homeless(x) -> Mismarry(x, georgia))\nforall x (Astound(x, georgia) and Astound(georgia, farica) -> Tilled(georgia))\nMismarry(georgia, farica) -> Tilled(georgia)\nforall x (Mismarry(x, farica) and Tilled(farica) -> Healing(farica))\n\nAstound(farica, farica)\n\nAstound(farica, farica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The giff bowdlerise the barbette. The barbette bowdlerise the giff. If the giff is aglitter then the giff is galling. If someone is aglitter then they chase the giff. If someone is galling then they eat the barbette. If someone bisect the barbette and the barbette bisect the giff then the barbette is aglitter. If the barbette bowdlerise the giff then the barbette is aglitter. If someone bowdlerise the giff and the giff is aglitter then the giff is epical. The giff does not need the barbette.", "logic": "\nBowdlerise(giff, barbette)\nBowdlerise(barbette, giff)\nAglitter(giff) -> Galling(giff)\nforall x (Aglitter(x) -> Despise(x, giff))\nforall x (Galling(x) -> Bowdlerise(x, barbette))\nforall x (Bisect(x, barbette) and Bisect(barbette, giff) -> Aglitter(barbette))\nBowdlerise(barbette, giff) -> Aglitter(barbette)\nforall x (Bowdlerise(x, giff) and Aglitter(giff) -> Epical(giff))\n\nnot Bisect(giff, barbette)\n\nnot Bisect(giff, barbette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The aubert obscure the katherine. The katherine obscure the aubert. If the aubert is wishful then the aubert is squeezable. If someone is wishful then they chase the aubert. If someone is squeezable then they eat the katherine. If someone bemire the katherine and the katherine bemire the aubert then the katherine is wishful. If the katherine obscure the aubert then the katherine is wishful. If someone obscure the aubert and the aubert is wishful then the aubert is pinchbeck. The katherine govern the katherine.", "logic": "\nObscure(aubert, katherine)\nObscure(katherine, aubert)\nWishful(aubert) -> Squeezable(aubert)\nforall x (Wishful(x) -> Govern(x, aubert))\nforall x (Squeezable(x) -> Obscure(x, katherine))\nforall x (Bemire(x, katherine) and Bemire(katherine, aubert) -> Wishful(katherine))\nObscure(katherine, aubert) -> Wishful(katherine)\nforall x (Obscure(x, aubert) and Wishful(aubert) -> Pinchbeck(aubert))\n\nGovern(katherine, katherine)\n\nGovern(katherine, katherine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-841"} {"premises": "The adela unteach the broddy. The adela is cellulosid. The adela is recusant. The adela is not siberian. The adela is not reformed. The adela is not unvoiced. The adela housebreak the broddy. The adela lambaste the broddy. The broddy unteach the adela. The broddy is cellulosid. The broddy is recusant. The broddy is siberian. The broddy is reformed. The broddy is unvoiced. The broddy housebreak the adela. The broddy lambaste the adela. If something is recusant then it lambaste the broddy. If something lambaste the broddy then it housebreak the broddy. If the adela is unvoiced then the adela lambaste the broddy. The broddy is unvoiced.", "logic": "\nUnteach(adela, broddy)\nCellulosid(adela)\nRecusant(adela)\nnot Siberian(adela)\nnot Reformed(adela)\nnot Unvoiced(adela)\nHousebreak(adela, broddy)\nLambaste(adela, broddy)\nUnteach(broddy, adela)\nCellulosid(broddy)\nRecusant(broddy)\nSiberian(broddy)\nReformed(broddy)\nUnvoiced(broddy)\nHousebreak(broddy, adela)\nLambaste(broddy, adela)\nforall x (Recusant(x) -> Lambaste(x, broddy))\nforall x (Lambaste(x, broddy) -> Housebreak(x, broddy))\nUnvoiced(adela) -> Lambaste(adela, broddy)\n\nUnvoiced(broddy)\n\ntherefore Unvoiced(broddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The hogan storm the horatia. The hogan is lanate. The hogan is spellbound. The hogan is not memorable. The hogan is not compounded. The hogan is not speakable. The hogan bind the horatia. The hogan dominate the horatia. The horatia storm the hogan. The horatia is lanate. The horatia is spellbound. The horatia is memorable. The horatia is compounded. The horatia is speakable. The horatia bind the hogan. The horatia dominate the hogan. If something is spellbound then it dominate the horatia. If something dominate the horatia then it bind the horatia. If the hogan is speakable then the hogan dominate the horatia. The horatia is not speakable.", "logic": "\nStorm(hogan, horatia)\nLanate(hogan)\nSpellbound(hogan)\nnot Memorable(hogan)\nnot Compounded(hogan)\nnot Speakable(hogan)\nBind(hogan, horatia)\nDominate(hogan, horatia)\nStorm(horatia, hogan)\nLanate(horatia)\nSpellbound(horatia)\nMemorable(horatia)\nCompounded(horatia)\nSpeakable(horatia)\nBind(horatia, hogan)\nDominate(horatia, hogan)\nforall x (Spellbound(x) -> Dominate(x, horatia))\nforall x (Dominate(x, horatia) -> Bind(x, horatia))\nSpeakable(hogan) -> Dominate(hogan, horatia)\n\nnot Speakable(horatia)\n\ntherefore Speakable(horatia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The glynn frequent the marya. The glynn is sensate. The glynn is painless. The glynn is not ataraxic. The glynn is not pockmarked. The glynn is not sappy. The glynn pour the marya. The glynn humor the marya. The marya frequent the glynn. The marya is sensate. The marya is painless. The marya is ataraxic. The marya is pockmarked. The marya is sappy. The marya pour the glynn. The marya humor the glynn. If something is painless then it humor the marya. If something humor the marya then it pour the marya. If the glynn is sappy then the glynn humor the marya. The marya humor the marya.", "logic": "\nFrequent(glynn, marya)\nSensate(glynn)\nPainless(glynn)\nnot Ataraxic(glynn)\nnot Pockmarked(glynn)\nnot Sappy(glynn)\nPour(glynn, marya)\nHumor(glynn, marya)\nFrequent(marya, glynn)\nSensate(marya)\nPainless(marya)\nAtaraxic(marya)\nPockmarked(marya)\nSappy(marya)\nPour(marya, glynn)\nHumor(marya, glynn)\nforall x (Painless(x) -> Humor(x, marya))\nforall x (Humor(x, marya) -> Pour(x, marya))\nSappy(glynn) -> Humor(glynn, marya)\n\nHumor(marya, marya)\n\nPainless(marya) and forall x (Painless(x) -> Humor(x, marya)) -> therefore Humor(marya, marya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The kourtney succumb the torrance. The kourtney is comburant. The kourtney is purgative. The kourtney is not flattering. The kourtney is not neckless. The kourtney is not momentary. The kourtney reappraise the torrance. The kourtney elope the torrance. The torrance succumb the kourtney. The torrance is comburant. The torrance is purgative. The torrance is flattering. The torrance is neckless. The torrance is momentary. The torrance reappraise the kourtney. The torrance elope the kourtney. If something is purgative then it elope the torrance. If something elope the torrance then it reappraise the torrance. If the kourtney is momentary then the kourtney elope the torrance. The torrance does not visit the torrance.", "logic": "\nSuccumb(kourtney, torrance)\nComburant(kourtney)\nPurgative(kourtney)\nnot Flattering(kourtney)\nnot Neckless(kourtney)\nnot Momentary(kourtney)\nReappraise(kourtney, torrance)\nElope(kourtney, torrance)\nSuccumb(torrance, kourtney)\nComburant(torrance)\nPurgative(torrance)\nFlattering(torrance)\nNeckless(torrance)\nMomentary(torrance)\nReappraise(torrance, kourtney)\nElope(torrance, kourtney)\nforall x (Purgative(x) -> Elope(x, torrance))\nforall x (Elope(x, torrance) -> Reappraise(x, torrance))\nMomentary(kourtney) -> Elope(kourtney, torrance)\n\nnot Elope(torrance, torrance)\n\nPurgative(torrance) and forall x (Purgative(x) -> Elope(x, torrance)) -> therefore Elope(torrance, torrance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The edsel liquefy the moyra. The edsel is suasible. The edsel is ramose. The edsel is not savory. The edsel is not louche. The edsel is not moral. The edsel company the moyra. The edsel clarion the moyra. The moyra liquefy the edsel. The moyra is suasible. The moyra is ramose. The moyra is savory. The moyra is louche. The moyra is moral. The moyra company the edsel. The moyra clarion the edsel. If something is ramose then it clarion the moyra. If something clarion the moyra then it company the moyra. If the edsel is moral then the edsel clarion the moyra. The moyra company the moyra.", "logic": "\nLiquefy(edsel, moyra)\nSuasible(edsel)\nRamose(edsel)\nnot Savory(edsel)\nnot Louche(edsel)\nnot Moral(edsel)\nCompany(edsel, moyra)\nClarion(edsel, moyra)\nLiquefy(moyra, edsel)\nSuasible(moyra)\nRamose(moyra)\nSavory(moyra)\nLouche(moyra)\nMoral(moyra)\nCompany(moyra, edsel)\nClarion(moyra, edsel)\nforall x (Ramose(x) -> Clarion(x, moyra))\nforall x (Clarion(x, moyra) -> Company(x, moyra))\nMoral(edsel) -> Clarion(edsel, moyra)\n\nCompany(moyra, moyra)\n\nRamose(moyra) and forall x (Ramose(x) -> Clarion(x, moyra)) -> therefore Clarion(moyra, moyra) Clarion(moyra, moyra) and forall x (Clarion(x, moyra) -> Company(x, moyra)) -> therefore Company(moyra, moyra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The maurene cane the bathsheba. The maurene is callable. The maurene is flash. The maurene is not dialectic. The maurene is not burdenless. The maurene is not libertine. The maurene squat the bathsheba. The maurene withhold the bathsheba. The bathsheba cane the maurene. The bathsheba is callable. The bathsheba is flash. The bathsheba is dialectic. The bathsheba is burdenless. The bathsheba is libertine. The bathsheba squat the maurene. The bathsheba withhold the maurene. If something is flash then it withhold the bathsheba. If something withhold the bathsheba then it squat the bathsheba. If the maurene is libertine then the maurene withhold the bathsheba. The bathsheba does not see the bathsheba.", "logic": "\nCane(maurene, bathsheba)\nCallable(maurene)\nFlash(maurene)\nnot Dialectic(maurene)\nnot Burdenless(maurene)\nnot Libertine(maurene)\nSquat(maurene, bathsheba)\nWithhold(maurene, bathsheba)\nCane(bathsheba, maurene)\nCallable(bathsheba)\nFlash(bathsheba)\nDialectic(bathsheba)\nBurdenless(bathsheba)\nLibertine(bathsheba)\nSquat(bathsheba, maurene)\nWithhold(bathsheba, maurene)\nforall x (Flash(x) -> Withhold(x, bathsheba))\nforall x (Withhold(x, bathsheba) -> Squat(x, bathsheba))\nLibertine(maurene) -> Withhold(maurene, bathsheba)\n\nnot Squat(bathsheba, bathsheba)\n\nFlash(bathsheba) and forall x (Flash(x) -> Withhold(x, bathsheba)) -> therefore Withhold(bathsheba, bathsheba) Withhold(bathsheba, bathsheba) and forall x (Withhold(x, bathsheba) -> Squat(x, bathsheba)) -> therefore Squat(bathsheba, bathsheba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The stanleigh alter the somerset. The stanleigh is fistulate. The stanleigh is evidenced. The stanleigh is not appalling. The stanleigh is not sensory. The stanleigh is not brindled. The stanleigh seesaw the somerset. The stanleigh corduroy the somerset. The somerset alter the stanleigh. The somerset is fistulate. The somerset is evidenced. The somerset is appalling. The somerset is sensory. The somerset is brindled. The somerset seesaw the stanleigh. The somerset corduroy the stanleigh. If something is evidenced then it corduroy the somerset. If something corduroy the somerset then it seesaw the somerset. If the stanleigh is brindled then the stanleigh corduroy the somerset. The somerset does not chase the somerset.", "logic": "\nAlter(stanleigh, somerset)\nFistulate(stanleigh)\nEvidenced(stanleigh)\nnot Appalling(stanleigh)\nnot Sensory(stanleigh)\nnot Brindled(stanleigh)\nSeesaw(stanleigh, somerset)\nCorduroy(stanleigh, somerset)\nAlter(somerset, stanleigh)\nFistulate(somerset)\nEvidenced(somerset)\nAppalling(somerset)\nSensory(somerset)\nBrindled(somerset)\nSeesaw(somerset, stanleigh)\nCorduroy(somerset, stanleigh)\nforall x (Evidenced(x) -> Corduroy(x, somerset))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, somerset) -> Seesaw(x, somerset))\nBrindled(stanleigh) -> Corduroy(stanleigh, somerset)\n\nnot Alter(somerset, somerset)\n\nnot Alter(somerset, somerset) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The sandro epitomise the westleigh. The sandro is homing. The sandro is periodical. The sandro is not sedgy. The sandro is not spicate. The sandro is not evaporable. The sandro cinematize the westleigh. The sandro vanquish the westleigh. The westleigh epitomise the sandro. The westleigh is homing. The westleigh is periodical. The westleigh is sedgy. The westleigh is spicate. The westleigh is evaporable. The westleigh cinematize the sandro. The westleigh vanquish the sandro. If something is periodical then it vanquish the westleigh. If something vanquish the westleigh then it cinematize the westleigh. If the sandro is evaporable then the sandro vanquish the westleigh. The sandro cinematize the sandro.", "logic": "\nEpitomise(sandro, westleigh)\nHoming(sandro)\nPeriodical(sandro)\nnot Sedgy(sandro)\nnot Spicate(sandro)\nnot Evaporable(sandro)\nCinematize(sandro, westleigh)\nVanquish(sandro, westleigh)\nEpitomise(westleigh, sandro)\nHoming(westleigh)\nPeriodical(westleigh)\nSedgy(westleigh)\nSpicate(westleigh)\nEvaporable(westleigh)\nCinematize(westleigh, sandro)\nVanquish(westleigh, sandro)\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Vanquish(x, westleigh))\nforall x (Vanquish(x, westleigh) -> Cinematize(x, westleigh))\nEvaporable(sandro) -> Vanquish(sandro, westleigh)\n\nCinematize(sandro, sandro)\n\nCinematize(sandro, sandro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The brock repeat the debee. The brock is warty. The brock is autosomal. The brock is not puffy. The brock is not flimsy. The brock is not grievous. The brock blotch the debee. The brock scoff the debee. The debee repeat the brock. The debee is warty. The debee is autosomal. The debee is puffy. The debee is flimsy. The debee is grievous. The debee blotch the brock. The debee scoff the brock. If something is autosomal then it scoff the debee. If something scoff the debee then it blotch the debee. If the brock is grievous then the brock scoff the debee. The brock does not chase the brock.", "logic": "\nRepeat(brock, debee)\nWarty(brock)\nAutosomal(brock)\nnot Puffy(brock)\nnot Flimsy(brock)\nnot Grievous(brock)\nBlotch(brock, debee)\nScoff(brock, debee)\nRepeat(debee, brock)\nWarty(debee)\nAutosomal(debee)\nPuffy(debee)\nFlimsy(debee)\nGrievous(debee)\nBlotch(debee, brock)\nScoff(debee, brock)\nforall x (Autosomal(x) -> Scoff(x, debee))\nforall x (Scoff(x, debee) -> Blotch(x, debee))\nGrievous(brock) -> Scoff(brock, debee)\n\nnot Repeat(brock, brock)\n\nnot Repeat(brock, brock) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The fortune exudate the mendie. The fortune is papal. The fortune is glottal. The fortune is not virtuoso. The fortune is not aboral. The fortune is not feline. The fortune blinker the mendie. The fortune root the mendie. The mendie exudate the fortune. The mendie is papal. The mendie is glottal. The mendie is virtuoso. The mendie is aboral. The mendie is feline. The mendie blinker the fortune. The mendie root the fortune. If something is glottal then it root the mendie. If something root the mendie then it blinker the mendie. If the fortune is feline then the fortune root the mendie. The fortune root the fortune.", "logic": "\nExudate(fortune, mendie)\nPapal(fortune)\nGlottal(fortune)\nnot Virtuoso(fortune)\nnot Aboral(fortune)\nnot Feline(fortune)\nBlinker(fortune, mendie)\nRoot(fortune, mendie)\nExudate(mendie, fortune)\nPapal(mendie)\nGlottal(mendie)\nVirtuoso(mendie)\nAboral(mendie)\nFeline(mendie)\nBlinker(mendie, fortune)\nRoot(mendie, fortune)\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Root(x, mendie))\nforall x (Root(x, mendie) -> Blinker(x, mendie))\nFeline(fortune) -> Root(fortune, mendie)\n\nRoot(fortune, fortune)\n\nRoot(fortune, fortune) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-950"} {"premises": "The luke tout the catlee. The luke disarrange the catlee. The catlee is cashable. The catlee is not adaptable. The catlee tout the ricard. The eric is regardful. The eric disarrange the catlee. The ricard is cashable. The ricard tout the luke. The ricard outsource the luke. If something disarrange the catlee then the catlee does not need the luke. If something outsource the eric and the eric tout the luke then the eric disarrange the ricard. All adaptable things are unvaried. If something tout the luke and it outsource the eric then the luke is cashable. If something outsource the eric then the eric disarrange the catlee. If something tout the ricard and it is not regardful then it tout the luke. If something tout the catlee and the catlee is regardful then the catlee does not like the eric. If something is cashable then it outsource the eric. The catlee tout the ricard.", "logic": "\nTout(luke, catlee)\nDisarrange(luke, catlee)\nCashable(catlee)\nnot Adaptable(catlee)\nTout(catlee, ricard)\nRegardful(eric)\nDisarrange(eric, catlee)\nCashable(ricard)\nTout(ricard, luke)\nOutsource(ricard, luke)\nforall x (Disarrange(x, catlee) -> not Disarrange(catlee, luke))\nforall x (Outsource(x, eric) and Tout(eric, luke) -> Disarrange(eric, ricard))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Unvaried(x))\nforall x (Tout(x, luke) and Outsource(x, eric) -> Cashable(luke))\nforall x (Outsource(x, eric) -> Disarrange(eric, catlee))\nforall x (Tout(x, ricard) and not Regardful(x) -> Tout(x, luke))\nforall x (Tout(x, catlee) and Regardful(catlee) -> not Tout(catlee, eric))\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> Outsource(x, eric))\n\nTout(catlee, ricard)\n\ntherefore Tout(catlee, ricard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The etti paganise the stuart. The etti reheel the stuart. The stuart is repellent. The stuart is not wizard. The stuart paganise the marga. The carleigh is seared. The carleigh reheel the stuart. The marga is repellent. The marga paganise the etti. The marga bode the etti. If something reheel the stuart then the stuart does not need the etti. If something bode the carleigh and the carleigh paganise the etti then the carleigh reheel the marga. All wizard things are putrid. If something paganise the etti and it bode the carleigh then the etti is repellent. If something bode the carleigh then the carleigh reheel the stuart. If something paganise the marga and it is not seared then it paganise the etti. If something paganise the stuart and the stuart is seared then the stuart does not like the carleigh. If something is repellent then it bode the carleigh. The stuart does not like the marga.", "logic": "\nPaganise(etti, stuart)\nReheel(etti, stuart)\nRepellent(stuart)\nnot Wizard(stuart)\nPaganise(stuart, marga)\nSeared(carleigh)\nReheel(carleigh, stuart)\nRepellent(marga)\nPaganise(marga, etti)\nBode(marga, etti)\nforall x (Reheel(x, stuart) -> not Reheel(stuart, etti))\nforall x (Bode(x, carleigh) and Paganise(carleigh, etti) -> Reheel(carleigh, marga))\nforall x (Wizard(x) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Paganise(x, etti) and Bode(x, carleigh) -> Repellent(etti))\nforall x (Bode(x, carleigh) -> Reheel(carleigh, stuart))\nforall x (Paganise(x, marga) and not Seared(x) -> Paganise(x, etti))\nforall x (Paganise(x, stuart) and Seared(stuart) -> not Paganise(stuart, carleigh))\nforall x (Repellent(x) -> Bode(x, carleigh))\n\nnot Paganise(stuart, marga)\n\ntherefore Paganise(stuart, marga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The harriot slag the murdoch. The harriot induct the murdoch. The murdoch is meritless. The murdoch is not brimful. The murdoch slag the klee. The carma is strangled. The carma induct the murdoch. The klee is meritless. The klee slag the harriot. The klee swob the harriot. If something induct the murdoch then the murdoch does not need the harriot. If something swob the carma and the carma slag the harriot then the carma induct the klee. All brimful things are quasi. If something slag the harriot and it swob the carma then the harriot is meritless. If something swob the carma then the carma induct the murdoch. If something slag the klee and it is not strangled then it slag the harriot. If something slag the murdoch and the murdoch is strangled then the murdoch does not like the carma. If something is meritless then it swob the carma. The murdoch does not need the harriot.", "logic": "\nSlag(harriot, murdoch)\nInduct(harriot, murdoch)\nMeritless(murdoch)\nnot Brimful(murdoch)\nSlag(murdoch, klee)\nStrangled(carma)\nInduct(carma, murdoch)\nMeritless(klee)\nSlag(klee, harriot)\nSwob(klee, harriot)\nforall x (Induct(x, murdoch) -> not Induct(murdoch, harriot))\nforall x (Swob(x, carma) and Slag(carma, harriot) -> Induct(carma, klee))\nforall x (Brimful(x) -> Quasi(x))\nforall x (Slag(x, harriot) and Swob(x, carma) -> Meritless(harriot))\nforall x (Swob(x, carma) -> Induct(carma, murdoch))\nforall x (Slag(x, klee) and not Strangled(x) -> Slag(x, harriot))\nforall x (Slag(x, murdoch) and Strangled(murdoch) -> not Slag(murdoch, carma))\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Swob(x, carma))\n\nnot Induct(murdoch, harriot)\n\nInduct(harriot, murdoch) and forall x (Induct(x, murdoch) -> not Induct(murdoch, harriot)) -> therefore not Induct(murdoch, harriot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The susann glass the sturgis. The susann luxate the sturgis. The sturgis is baffled. The sturgis is not graduated. The sturgis glass the rudolph. The sukey is reverting. The sukey luxate the sturgis. The rudolph is baffled. The rudolph glass the susann. The rudolph trade the susann. If something luxate the sturgis then the sturgis does not need the susann. If something trade the sukey and the sukey glass the susann then the sukey luxate the rudolph. All graduated things are turgid. If something glass the susann and it trade the sukey then the susann is baffled. If something trade the sukey then the sukey luxate the sturgis. If something glass the rudolph and it is not reverting then it glass the susann. If something glass the sturgis and the sturgis is reverting then the sturgis does not like the sukey. If something is baffled then it trade the sukey. The sturgis luxate the susann.", "logic": "\nGlass(susann, sturgis)\nLuxate(susann, sturgis)\nBaffled(sturgis)\nnot Graduated(sturgis)\nGlass(sturgis, rudolph)\nReverting(sukey)\nLuxate(sukey, sturgis)\nBaffled(rudolph)\nGlass(rudolph, susann)\nTrade(rudolph, susann)\nforall x (Luxate(x, sturgis) -> not Luxate(sturgis, susann))\nforall x (Trade(x, sukey) and Glass(sukey, susann) -> Luxate(sukey, rudolph))\nforall x (Graduated(x) -> Turgid(x))\nforall x (Glass(x, susann) and Trade(x, sukey) -> Baffled(susann))\nforall x (Trade(x, sukey) -> Luxate(sukey, sturgis))\nforall x (Glass(x, rudolph) and not Reverting(x) -> Glass(x, susann))\nforall x (Glass(x, sturgis) and Reverting(sturgis) -> not Glass(sturgis, sukey))\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Trade(x, sukey))\n\nLuxate(sturgis, susann)\n\nLuxate(susann, sturgis) and forall x (Luxate(x, sturgis) -> not Luxate(sturgis, susann)) -> therefore not Luxate(sturgis, susann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The blayne minimise the maisie. The blayne descale the maisie. The maisie is bulgy. The maisie is not untried. The maisie minimise the vina. The buck is malarial. The buck descale the maisie. The vina is bulgy. The vina minimise the blayne. The vina thud the blayne. If something descale the maisie then the maisie does not need the blayne. If something thud the buck and the buck minimise the blayne then the buck descale the vina. All untried things are servo. If something minimise the blayne and it thud the buck then the blayne is bulgy. If something thud the buck then the buck descale the maisie. If something minimise the vina and it is not malarial then it minimise the blayne. If something minimise the maisie and the maisie is malarial then the maisie does not like the buck. If something is bulgy then it thud the buck. The blayne is bulgy.", "logic": "\nMinimise(blayne, maisie)\nDescale(blayne, maisie)\nBulgy(maisie)\nnot Untried(maisie)\nMinimise(maisie, vina)\nMalarial(buck)\nDescale(buck, maisie)\nBulgy(vina)\nMinimise(vina, blayne)\nThud(vina, blayne)\nforall x (Descale(x, maisie) -> not Descale(maisie, blayne))\nforall x (Thud(x, buck) and Minimise(buck, blayne) -> Descale(buck, vina))\nforall x (Untried(x) -> Servo(x))\nforall x (Minimise(x, blayne) and Thud(x, buck) -> Bulgy(blayne))\nforall x (Thud(x, buck) -> Descale(buck, maisie))\nforall x (Minimise(x, vina) and not Malarial(x) -> Minimise(x, blayne))\nforall x (Minimise(x, maisie) and Malarial(maisie) -> not Minimise(maisie, buck))\nforall x (Bulgy(x) -> Thud(x, buck))\n\nBulgy(blayne)\n\nBulgy(vina) and forall x (Bulgy(x) -> Thud(x, buck)) -> therefore Thud(vina, buck) Minimise(vina, blayne) and Thud(vina, buck) and forall x (Minimise(x, blayne) and Thud(x, buck) -> Bulgy(blayne)) -> therefore Bulgy(blayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The tracie prehend the odelia. The tracie disembowel the odelia. The odelia is circinate. The odelia is not lxxvii. The odelia prehend the ethelind. The oreste is gleaming. The oreste disembowel the odelia. The ethelind is circinate. The ethelind prehend the tracie. The ethelind change the tracie. If something disembowel the odelia then the odelia does not need the tracie. If something change the oreste and the oreste prehend the tracie then the oreste disembowel the ethelind. All lxxvii things are unisexual. If something prehend the tracie and it change the oreste then the tracie is circinate. If something change the oreste then the oreste disembowel the odelia. If something prehend the ethelind and it is not gleaming then it prehend the tracie. If something prehend the odelia and the odelia is gleaming then the odelia does not like the oreste. If something is circinate then it change the oreste. The tracie is not circinate.", "logic": "\nPrehend(tracie, odelia)\nDisembowel(tracie, odelia)\nCircinate(odelia)\nnot Lxxvii(odelia)\nPrehend(odelia, ethelind)\nGleaming(oreste)\nDisembowel(oreste, odelia)\nCircinate(ethelind)\nPrehend(ethelind, tracie)\nChange(ethelind, tracie)\nforall x (Disembowel(x, odelia) -> not Disembowel(odelia, tracie))\nforall x (Change(x, oreste) and Prehend(oreste, tracie) -> Disembowel(oreste, ethelind))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Unisexual(x))\nforall x (Prehend(x, tracie) and Change(x, oreste) -> Circinate(tracie))\nforall x (Change(x, oreste) -> Disembowel(oreste, odelia))\nforall x (Prehend(x, ethelind) and not Gleaming(x) -> Prehend(x, tracie))\nforall x (Prehend(x, odelia) and Gleaming(odelia) -> not Prehend(odelia, oreste))\nforall x (Circinate(x) -> Change(x, oreste))\n\nnot Circinate(tracie)\n\nCircinate(ethelind) and forall x (Circinate(x) -> Change(x, oreste)) -> therefore Change(ethelind, oreste) Prehend(ethelind, tracie) and Change(ethelind, oreste) and forall x (Prehend(x, tracie) and Change(x, oreste) -> Circinate(tracie)) -> therefore Circinate(tracie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The audy overlie the prent. The audy riot the prent. The prent is oxonian. The prent is not bifurcated. The prent overlie the fallon. The barney is petallike. The barney riot the prent. The fallon is oxonian. The fallon overlie the audy. The fallon josh the audy. If something riot the prent then the prent does not need the audy. If something josh the barney and the barney overlie the audy then the barney riot the fallon. All bifurcated things are posh. If something overlie the audy and it josh the barney then the audy is oxonian. If something josh the barney then the barney riot the prent. If something overlie the fallon and it is not petallike then it overlie the audy. If something overlie the prent and the prent is petallike then the prent does not like the barney. If something is oxonian then it josh the barney. The prent is not posh.", "logic": "\nOverlie(audy, prent)\nRiot(audy, prent)\nOxonian(prent)\nnot Bifurcated(prent)\nOverlie(prent, fallon)\nPetallike(barney)\nRiot(barney, prent)\nOxonian(fallon)\nOverlie(fallon, audy)\nJosh(fallon, audy)\nforall x (Riot(x, prent) -> not Riot(prent, audy))\nforall x (Josh(x, barney) and Overlie(barney, audy) -> Riot(barney, fallon))\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Posh(x))\nforall x (Overlie(x, audy) and Josh(x, barney) -> Oxonian(audy))\nforall x (Josh(x, barney) -> Riot(barney, prent))\nforall x (Overlie(x, fallon) and not Petallike(x) -> Overlie(x, audy))\nforall x (Overlie(x, prent) and Petallike(prent) -> not Overlie(prent, barney))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) -> Josh(x, barney))\n\nnot Posh(prent)\n\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Posh(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The celina oxygenize the craig. The celina freshen the craig. The craig is abrasive. The craig is not corruptive. The craig oxygenize the danit. The hewitt is fourscore. The hewitt freshen the craig. The danit is abrasive. The danit oxygenize the celina. The danit possess the celina. If something freshen the craig then the craig does not need the celina. If something possess the hewitt and the hewitt oxygenize the celina then the hewitt freshen the danit. All corruptive things are areal. If something oxygenize the celina and it possess the hewitt then the celina is abrasive. If something possess the hewitt then the hewitt freshen the craig. If something oxygenize the danit and it is not fourscore then it oxygenize the celina. If something oxygenize the craig and the craig is fourscore then the craig does not like the hewitt. If something is abrasive then it possess the hewitt. The hewitt is areal.", "logic": "\nOxygenize(celina, craig)\nFreshen(celina, craig)\nAbrasive(craig)\nnot Corruptive(craig)\nOxygenize(craig, danit)\nFourscore(hewitt)\nFreshen(hewitt, craig)\nAbrasive(danit)\nOxygenize(danit, celina)\nPossess(danit, celina)\nforall x (Freshen(x, craig) -> not Freshen(craig, celina))\nforall x (Possess(x, hewitt) and Oxygenize(hewitt, celina) -> Freshen(hewitt, danit))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Areal(x))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, celina) and Possess(x, hewitt) -> Abrasive(celina))\nforall x (Possess(x, hewitt) -> Freshen(hewitt, craig))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, danit) and not Fourscore(x) -> Oxygenize(x, celina))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, craig) and Fourscore(craig) -> not Oxygenize(craig, hewitt))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) -> Possess(x, hewitt))\n\nAreal(hewitt)\n\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Areal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The lucas violate the krissie. The lucas decimalise the krissie. The krissie is gouty. The krissie is not fooling. The krissie violate the ansel. The anstice is unreleased. The anstice decimalise the krissie. The ansel is gouty. The ansel violate the lucas. The ansel concentre the lucas. If something decimalise the krissie then the krissie does not need the lucas. If something concentre the anstice and the anstice violate the lucas then the anstice decimalise the ansel. All fooling things are seamed. If something violate the lucas and it concentre the anstice then the lucas is gouty. If something concentre the anstice then the anstice decimalise the krissie. If something violate the ansel and it is not unreleased then it violate the lucas. If something violate the krissie and the krissie is unreleased then the krissie does not like the anstice. If something is gouty then it concentre the anstice. The anstice does not visit the anstice.", "logic": "\nViolate(lucas, krissie)\nDecimalise(lucas, krissie)\nGouty(krissie)\nnot Fooling(krissie)\nViolate(krissie, ansel)\nUnreleased(anstice)\nDecimalise(anstice, krissie)\nGouty(ansel)\nViolate(ansel, lucas)\nConcentre(ansel, lucas)\nforall x (Decimalise(x, krissie) -> not Decimalise(krissie, lucas))\nforall x (Concentre(x, anstice) and Violate(anstice, lucas) -> Decimalise(anstice, ansel))\nforall x (Fooling(x) -> Seamed(x))\nforall x (Violate(x, lucas) and Concentre(x, anstice) -> Gouty(lucas))\nforall x (Concentre(x, anstice) -> Decimalise(anstice, krissie))\nforall x (Violate(x, ansel) and not Unreleased(x) -> Violate(x, lucas))\nforall x (Violate(x, krissie) and Unreleased(krissie) -> not Violate(krissie, anstice))\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Concentre(x, anstice))\n\nnot Concentre(anstice, anstice)\n\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Concentre(x, anstice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The bride rhapsodise the lori. The bride effeminize the lori. The lori is talkative. The lori is not xiii. The lori rhapsodise the leopold. The geoffrey is overfond. The geoffrey effeminize the lori. The leopold is talkative. The leopold rhapsodise the bride. The leopold ruin the bride. If something effeminize the lori then the lori does not need the bride. If something ruin the geoffrey and the geoffrey rhapsodise the bride then the geoffrey effeminize the leopold. All xiii things are hagridden. If something rhapsodise the bride and it ruin the geoffrey then the bride is talkative. If something ruin the geoffrey then the geoffrey effeminize the lori. If something rhapsodise the leopold and it is not overfond then it rhapsodise the bride. If something rhapsodise the lori and the lori is overfond then the lori does not like the geoffrey. If something is talkative then it ruin the geoffrey. The geoffrey rhapsodise the geoffrey.", "logic": "\nRhapsodise(bride, lori)\nEffeminize(bride, lori)\nTalkative(lori)\nnot Xiii(lori)\nRhapsodise(lori, leopold)\nOverfond(geoffrey)\nEffeminize(geoffrey, lori)\nTalkative(leopold)\nRhapsodise(leopold, bride)\nRuin(leopold, bride)\nforall x (Effeminize(x, lori) -> not Effeminize(lori, bride))\nforall x (Ruin(x, geoffrey) and Rhapsodise(geoffrey, bride) -> Effeminize(geoffrey, leopold))\nforall x (Xiii(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, bride) and Ruin(x, geoffrey) -> Talkative(bride))\nforall x (Ruin(x, geoffrey) -> Effeminize(geoffrey, lori))\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, leopold) and not Overfond(x) -> Rhapsodise(x, bride))\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, lori) and Overfond(lori) -> not Rhapsodise(lori, geoffrey))\nforall x (Talkative(x) -> Ruin(x, geoffrey))\n\nRhapsodise(geoffrey, geoffrey)\n\nRhapsodise(geoffrey, geoffrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The dove chevvy the ajay. The dove empale the ajay. The ajay is alimentary. The ajay is not raining. The ajay chevvy the robbin. The lenka is paniculate. The lenka empale the ajay. The robbin is alimentary. The robbin chevvy the dove. The robbin haul the dove. If something empale the ajay then the ajay does not need the dove. If something haul the lenka and the lenka chevvy the dove then the lenka empale the robbin. All raining things are forensic. If something chevvy the dove and it haul the lenka then the dove is alimentary. If something haul the lenka then the lenka empale the ajay. If something chevvy the robbin and it is not paniculate then it chevvy the dove. If something chevvy the ajay and the ajay is paniculate then the ajay does not like the lenka. If something is alimentary then it haul the lenka. The robbin does not like the lenka.", "logic": "\nChevvy(dove, ajay)\nEmpale(dove, ajay)\nAlimentary(ajay)\nnot Raining(ajay)\nChevvy(ajay, robbin)\nPaniculate(lenka)\nEmpale(lenka, ajay)\nAlimentary(robbin)\nChevvy(robbin, dove)\nHaul(robbin, dove)\nforall x (Empale(x, ajay) -> not Empale(ajay, dove))\nforall x (Haul(x, lenka) and Chevvy(lenka, dove) -> Empale(lenka, robbin))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> Forensic(x))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, dove) and Haul(x, lenka) -> Alimentary(dove))\nforall x (Haul(x, lenka) -> Empale(lenka, ajay))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, robbin) and not Paniculate(x) -> Chevvy(x, dove))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, ajay) and Paniculate(ajay) -> not Chevvy(ajay, lenka))\nforall x (Alimentary(x) -> Haul(x, lenka))\n\nnot Chevvy(robbin, lenka)\n\nnot Chevvy(robbin, lenka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "The rubi flurry the rene. The rubi bulwark the rene. The rene is gratuitous. The rene is not exocentric. The rene flurry the odelle. The connolly is fusty. The connolly bulwark the rene. The odelle is gratuitous. The odelle flurry the rubi. The odelle braise the rubi. If something bulwark the rene then the rene does not need the rubi. If something braise the connolly and the connolly flurry the rubi then the connolly bulwark the odelle. All exocentric things are chondritic. If something flurry the rubi and it braise the connolly then the rubi is gratuitous. If something braise the connolly then the connolly bulwark the rene. If something flurry the odelle and it is not fusty then it flurry the rubi. If something flurry the rene and the rene is fusty then the rene does not like the connolly. If something is gratuitous then it braise the connolly. The rubi flurry the odelle.", "logic": "\nFlurry(rubi, rene)\nBulwark(rubi, rene)\nGratuitous(rene)\nnot Exocentric(rene)\nFlurry(rene, odelle)\nFusty(connolly)\nBulwark(connolly, rene)\nGratuitous(odelle)\nFlurry(odelle, rubi)\nBraise(odelle, rubi)\nforall x (Bulwark(x, rene) -> not Bulwark(rene, rubi))\nforall x (Braise(x, connolly) and Flurry(connolly, rubi) -> Bulwark(connolly, odelle))\nforall x (Exocentric(x) -> Chondritic(x))\nforall x (Flurry(x, rubi) and Braise(x, connolly) -> Gratuitous(rubi))\nforall x (Braise(x, connolly) -> Bulwark(connolly, rene))\nforall x (Flurry(x, odelle) and not Fusty(x) -> Flurry(x, rubi))\nforall x (Flurry(x, rene) and Fusty(rene) -> not Flurry(rene, connolly))\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) -> Braise(x, connolly))\n\nFlurry(rubi, odelle)\n\nFlurry(rubi, odelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1997"} {"premises": "Augusta is not subdural. Augusta is untrue. Augusta is hackneyed. Augusta is diffused. Shannon is not slight. Shannon is aluminous. Shannon is not diffused. If something is aluminous and not slight then it is hackneyed. If something is hackneyed then it is unnerving. Shannon is not diffused.", "logic": "\nnot Subdural(augusta)\nUntrue(augusta)\nHackneyed(augusta)\nDiffused(augusta)\nnot Slight(shannon)\nAluminous(shannon)\nnot Diffused(shannon)\nforall x (Aluminous(x) and not Slight(x) -> Hackneyed(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) -> Unnerving(x))\n\nnot Diffused(shannon)\n\ntherefore not Diffused(shannon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Gavra is not nurtural. Gavra is mozartian. Gavra is mordant. Gavra is grey. Enrika is not larghetto. Enrika is cuneate. Enrika is not grey. If something is cuneate and not larghetto then it is mordant. If something is mordant then it is liii. Enrika is larghetto.", "logic": "\nnot Nurtural(gavra)\nMozartian(gavra)\nMordant(gavra)\nGrey(gavra)\nnot Larghetto(enrika)\nCuneate(enrika)\nnot Grey(enrika)\nforall x (Cuneate(x) and not Larghetto(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) -> Liii(x))\n\nLarghetto(enrika)\n\ntherefore not Larghetto(enrika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Lynett is not despondent. Lynett is proximo. Lynett is surrounded. Lynett is imputable. Torrey is not short. Torrey is thickening. Torrey is not imputable. If something is thickening and not short then it is surrounded. If something is surrounded then it is marian. Torrey is surrounded.", "logic": "\nnot Despondent(lynett)\nProximo(lynett)\nSurrounded(lynett)\nImputable(lynett)\nnot Short(torrey)\nThickening(torrey)\nnot Imputable(torrey)\nforall x (Thickening(x) and not Short(x) -> Surrounded(x))\nforall x (Surrounded(x) -> Marian(x))\n\nSurrounded(torrey)\n\nThickening(torrey) and not Short(torrey) and forall x (Thickening(x) and not Short(x) -> Surrounded(x)) -> therefore Surrounded(torrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Evvie is not atilt. Evvie is crisp. Evvie is suggestive. Evvie is endogamic. Hortense is not capitalist. Hortense is stooping. Hortense is not endogamic. If something is stooping and not capitalist then it is suggestive. If something is suggestive then it is watercress. Hortense is not suggestive.", "logic": "\nnot Atilt(evvie)\nCrisp(evvie)\nSuggestive(evvie)\nEndogamic(evvie)\nnot Capitalist(hortense)\nStooping(hortense)\nnot Endogamic(hortense)\nforall x (Stooping(x) and not Capitalist(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Suggestive(x) -> Watercress(x))\n\nnot Suggestive(hortense)\n\nStooping(hortense) and not Capitalist(hortense) and forall x (Stooping(x) and not Capitalist(x) -> Suggestive(x)) -> therefore Suggestive(hortense)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Caralie is not sounding. Caralie is bimodal. Caralie is salvific. Caralie is sybaritic. Inger is not fibreoptic. Inger is spotless. Inger is not sybaritic. If something is spotless and not fibreoptic then it is salvific. If something is salvific then it is pivotal. Inger is pivotal.", "logic": "\nnot Sounding(caralie)\nBimodal(caralie)\nSalvific(caralie)\nSybaritic(caralie)\nnot Fibreoptic(inger)\nSpotless(inger)\nnot Sybaritic(inger)\nforall x (Spotless(x) and not Fibreoptic(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Salvific(x) -> Pivotal(x))\n\nPivotal(inger)\n\nSpotless(inger) and not Fibreoptic(inger) and forall x (Spotless(x) and not Fibreoptic(x) -> Salvific(x)) -> therefore Salvific(inger) Salvific(inger) and forall x (Salvific(x) -> Pivotal(x)) -> therefore Pivotal(inger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Maxfield is not plumed. Maxfield is sardonic. Maxfield is denary. Maxfield is jangling. Lia is not displeased. Lia is hypotonic. Lia is not jangling. If something is hypotonic and not displeased then it is denary. If something is denary then it is maxi. Lia is not maxi.", "logic": "\nnot Plumed(maxfield)\nSardonic(maxfield)\nDenary(maxfield)\nJangling(maxfield)\nnot Displeased(lia)\nHypotonic(lia)\nnot Jangling(lia)\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) and not Displeased(x) -> Denary(x))\nforall x (Denary(x) -> Maxi(x))\n\nnot Maxi(lia)\n\nHypotonic(lia) and not Displeased(lia) and forall x (Hypotonic(x) and not Displeased(x) -> Denary(x)) -> therefore Denary(lia) Denary(lia) and forall x (Denary(x) -> Maxi(x)) -> therefore Maxi(lia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Ozzie is not killing. Ozzie is collarless. Ozzie is towering. Ozzie is jesuitical. Barn is not bolshevist. Barn is crosswise. Barn is not jesuitical. If something is crosswise and not bolshevist then it is towering. If something is towering then it is dental. Ozzie is not crosswise.", "logic": "\nnot Killing(ozzie)\nCollarless(ozzie)\nTowering(ozzie)\nJesuitical(ozzie)\nnot Bolshevist(barn)\nCrosswise(barn)\nnot Jesuitical(barn)\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and not Bolshevist(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Towering(x) -> Dental(x))\n\nnot Crosswise(ozzie)\n\nnot Crosswise(ozzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Fabian is not shady. Fabian is carpeted. Fabian is allogeneic. Fabian is harried. Colleen is not resultant. Colleen is elfin. Colleen is not harried. If something is elfin and not resultant then it is allogeneic. If something is allogeneic then it is swaybacked. Colleen is carpeted.", "logic": "\nnot Shady(fabian)\nCarpeted(fabian)\nAllogeneic(fabian)\nHarried(fabian)\nnot Resultant(colleen)\nElfin(colleen)\nnot Harried(colleen)\nforall x (Elfin(x) and not Resultant(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\n\nCarpeted(colleen)\n\nCarpeted(colleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Hamilton is not scornful. Hamilton is sedentary. Hamilton is random. Hamilton is fried. Reilly is not gabonese. Reilly is anatomical. Reilly is not fried. If something is anatomical and not gabonese then it is random. If something is random then it is pyramidal. Hamilton is not gabonese.", "logic": "\nnot Scornful(hamilton)\nSedentary(hamilton)\nRandom(hamilton)\nFried(hamilton)\nnot Gabonese(reilly)\nAnatomical(reilly)\nnot Fried(reilly)\nforall x (Anatomical(x) and not Gabonese(x) -> Random(x))\nforall x (Random(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\n\nnot Gabonese(hamilton)\n\nnot Gabonese(hamilton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Nels is not least. Nels is planar. Nels is skirting. Nels is slovakian. Crissy is not autotelic. Crissy is nonbearing. Crissy is not slovakian. If something is nonbearing and not autotelic then it is skirting. If something is skirting then it is rarefied. Crissy is least.", "logic": "\nnot Least(nels)\nPlanar(nels)\nSkirting(nels)\nSlovakian(nels)\nnot Autotelic(crissy)\nNonbearing(crissy)\nnot Slovakian(crissy)\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) and not Autotelic(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Rarefied(x))\n\nLeast(crissy)\n\nLeast(crissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-871"} {"premises": "Waldon is silty. Waldon is peripteral. Waldon is inherited. If someone is peripteral then they are abnormal. All thenar, silty people are inherited. Red people are thenar. If someone is mesmeric then they are watercress. If Waldon is inherited and Waldon is silty then Waldon is mesmeric. If Waldon is watercress then Waldon is thenar. Waldon is silty.", "logic": "\nSilty(waldon)\nPeripteral(waldon)\nInherited(waldon)\nforall x (Peripteral(x) -> Abnormal(x))\nforall x (Thenar(x) and Silty(x) -> Inherited(x))\nforall x (Inherited(x) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) -> Watercress(x))\nInherited(waldon) and Silty(waldon) -> Mesmeric(waldon)\nWatercress(waldon) -> Thenar(waldon)\n\nSilty(waldon)\n\ntherefore Silty(waldon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1191"} {"premises": "Waldon is embezzled. Waldon is coriaceous. Waldon is hanoverian. If someone is coriaceous then they are undesigned. All allogamous, embezzled people are hanoverian. Red people are allogamous. If someone is doleful then they are undeserved. If Waldon is hanoverian and Waldon is embezzled then Waldon is doleful. If Waldon is undeserved then Waldon is allogamous. Waldon is not coriaceous.", "logic": "\nEmbezzled(waldon)\nCoriaceous(waldon)\nHanoverian(waldon)\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Undesigned(x))\nforall x (Allogamous(x) and Embezzled(x) -> Hanoverian(x))\nforall x (Hanoverian(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nHanoverian(waldon) and Embezzled(waldon) -> Doleful(waldon)\nUndeserved(waldon) -> Allogamous(waldon)\n\nnot Coriaceous(waldon)\n\ntherefore Coriaceous(waldon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1191"} {"premises": "Filippa is sensory. Filippa is prudential. Filippa is metameric. If someone is prudential then they are callable. All quartzose, sensory people are metameric. Red people are quartzose. If someone is catchy then they are blocked. If Filippa is metameric and Filippa is sensory then Filippa is catchy. If Filippa is blocked then Filippa is quartzose. Filippa is quartzose.", "logic": "\nSensory(filippa)\nPrudential(filippa)\nMetameric(filippa)\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> Callable(x))\nforall x (Quartzose(x) and Sensory(x) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Metameric(x) -> Quartzose(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Blocked(x))\nMetameric(filippa) and Sensory(filippa) -> Catchy(filippa)\nBlocked(filippa) -> Quartzose(filippa)\n\nQuartzose(filippa)\n\nMetameric(filippa) and forall x (Metameric(x) -> Quartzose(x)) -> therefore Quartzose(filippa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1191"} {"premises": "Tisha is color. Tisha is untitled. Tisha is goaded. If someone is untitled then they are welfarist. All amebous, color people are goaded. Red people are amebous. If someone is inguinal then they are logy. If Tisha is goaded and Tisha is color then Tisha is inguinal. If Tisha is logy then Tisha is amebous. Tisha is not welfarist.", "logic": "\nColor(tisha)\nUntitled(tisha)\nGoaded(tisha)\nforall x (Untitled(x) -> Welfarist(x))\nforall x (Amebous(x) and Color(x) -> Goaded(x))\nforall x (Goaded(x) -> Amebous(x))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) -> Logy(x))\nGoaded(tisha) and Color(tisha) -> Inguinal(tisha)\nLogy(tisha) -> Amebous(tisha)\n\nnot Welfarist(tisha)\n\nUntitled(tisha) and forall x (Untitled(x) -> Welfarist(x)) -> therefore Welfarist(tisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1191"} {"premises": "Lynnea is unpowered. Lynnea is inaudible. Lynnea is puerperal. If someone is inaudible then they are transfixed. All roughshod, unpowered people are puerperal. Red people are roughshod. If someone is showery then they are preserved. If Lynnea is puerperal and Lynnea is unpowered then Lynnea is showery. If Lynnea is preserved then Lynnea is roughshod. Lynnea is preserved.", "logic": "\nUnpowered(lynnea)\nInaudible(lynnea)\nPuerperal(lynnea)\nforall x (Inaudible(x) -> Transfixed(x))\nforall x (Roughshod(x) and Unpowered(x) -> Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Puerperal(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Showery(x) -> Preserved(x))\nPuerperal(lynnea) and Unpowered(lynnea) -> Showery(lynnea)\nPreserved(lynnea) -> Roughshod(lynnea)\n\nPreserved(lynnea)\n\nPuerperal(lynnea) and Unpowered(lynnea) and Puerperal(lynnea) and Unpowered(lynnea) -> Showery(lynnea) -> therefore Showery(lynnea) Showery(lynnea) and forall x (Showery(x) -> Preserved(x)) -> therefore Preserved(lynnea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1191"} {"premises": "Marti is involute. Marti is trichrome. Marti is subocular. If someone is trichrome then they are hurrying. All regressive, involute people are subocular. Red people are regressive. If someone is melancholy then they are biconcave. If Marti is subocular and Marti is involute then Marti is melancholy. If Marti is biconcave then Marti is regressive. Marti is not biconcave.", "logic": "\nInvolute(marti)\nTrichrome(marti)\nSubocular(marti)\nforall x (Trichrome(x) -> Hurrying(x))\nforall x (Regressive(x) and Involute(x) -> Subocular(x))\nforall x (Subocular(x) -> Regressive(x))\nforall x (Melancholy(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nSubocular(marti) and Involute(marti) -> Melancholy(marti)\nBiconcave(marti) -> Regressive(marti)\n\nnot Biconcave(marti)\n\nSubocular(marti) and Involute(marti) and Subocular(marti) and Involute(marti) -> Melancholy(marti) -> therefore Melancholy(marti) Melancholy(marti) and forall x (Melancholy(x) -> Biconcave(x)) -> therefore Biconcave(marti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1191"} {"premises": "The gusella communise the nadia. The gusella glug the nadia. The nadia is expert. The nadia reimpose the marcelo. The davy reimpose the nadia. The marcelo is protecting. The marcelo glug the gusella. The marcelo glug the davy. The marcelo reimpose the gusella. The marcelo reimpose the nadia. If someone reimpose the nadia and the nadia communise the marcelo then the nadia communise the davy. Green people are biliary. If the davy is expert and the davy reimpose the marcelo then the davy glug the gusella. If the davy glug the gusella and the davy glug the nadia then the davy communise the gusella. If someone is jungly then they need the davy. If someone communise the gusella and they visit the nadia then they need the davy. If someone is literal and biliary then they need the davy. If someone is biliary then they need the marcelo. The davy reimpose the nadia.", "logic": "\nCommunise(gusella, nadia)\nGlug(gusella, nadia)\nExpert(nadia)\nReimpose(nadia, marcelo)\nReimpose(davy, nadia)\nProtecting(marcelo)\nGlug(marcelo, gusella)\nGlug(marcelo, davy)\nReimpose(marcelo, gusella)\nReimpose(marcelo, nadia)\nforall x (Reimpose(x, nadia) and Communise(nadia, marcelo) -> Communise(nadia, davy))\nforall x (Protecting(x) -> Biliary(x))\nExpert(davy) and Reimpose(davy, marcelo) -> Glug(davy, gusella)\nGlug(davy, gusella) and Glug(davy, nadia) -> Communise(davy, gusella)\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Communise(x, davy))\nforall x (Communise(x, gusella) and Reimpose(x, nadia) -> Communise(x, davy))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Biliary(x) -> Communise(x, davy))\nforall x (Biliary(x) -> Communise(x, marcelo))\n\nReimpose(davy, nadia)\n\ntherefore Reimpose(davy, nadia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The cass stool the lemar. The cass coiffe the lemar. The lemar is nominative. The lemar speciate the lynette. The rafe speciate the lemar. The lynette is treeless. The lynette coiffe the cass. The lynette coiffe the rafe. The lynette speciate the cass. The lynette speciate the lemar. If someone speciate the lemar and the lemar stool the lynette then the lemar stool the rafe. Green people are dutiable. If the rafe is nominative and the rafe speciate the lynette then the rafe coiffe the cass. If the rafe coiffe the cass and the rafe coiffe the lemar then the rafe stool the cass. If someone is expressed then they need the rafe. If someone stool the cass and they visit the lemar then they need the rafe. If someone is debonnaire and dutiable then they need the rafe. If someone is dutiable then they need the lynette. The lynette does not see the rafe.", "logic": "\nStool(cass, lemar)\nCoiffe(cass, lemar)\nNominative(lemar)\nSpeciate(lemar, lynette)\nSpeciate(rafe, lemar)\nTreeless(lynette)\nCoiffe(lynette, cass)\nCoiffe(lynette, rafe)\nSpeciate(lynette, cass)\nSpeciate(lynette, lemar)\nforall x (Speciate(x, lemar) and Stool(lemar, lynette) -> Stool(lemar, rafe))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Dutiable(x))\nNominative(rafe) and Speciate(rafe, lynette) -> Coiffe(rafe, cass)\nCoiffe(rafe, cass) and Coiffe(rafe, lemar) -> Stool(rafe, cass)\nforall x (Expressed(x) -> Stool(x, rafe))\nforall x (Stool(x, cass) and Speciate(x, lemar) -> Stool(x, rafe))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and Dutiable(x) -> Stool(x, rafe))\nforall x (Dutiable(x) -> Stool(x, lynette))\n\nnot Coiffe(lynette, rafe)\n\ntherefore Coiffe(lynette, rafe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The felicio ware the valenka. The felicio awaken the valenka. The valenka is aslant. The valenka point the stan. The adorne point the valenka. The stan is autoerotic. The stan awaken the felicio. The stan awaken the adorne. The stan point the felicio. The stan point the valenka. If someone point the valenka and the valenka ware the stan then the valenka ware the adorne. Green people are solidified. If the adorne is aslant and the adorne point the stan then the adorne awaken the felicio. If the adorne awaken the felicio and the adorne awaken the valenka then the adorne ware the felicio. If someone is avertable then they need the adorne. If someone ware the felicio and they visit the valenka then they need the adorne. If someone is sacculated and solidified then they need the adorne. If someone is solidified then they need the stan. The stan is solidified.", "logic": "\nWare(felicio, valenka)\nAwaken(felicio, valenka)\nAslant(valenka)\nPoint(valenka, stan)\nPoint(adorne, valenka)\nAutoerotic(stan)\nAwaken(stan, felicio)\nAwaken(stan, adorne)\nPoint(stan, felicio)\nPoint(stan, valenka)\nforall x (Point(x, valenka) and Ware(valenka, stan) -> Ware(valenka, adorne))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Solidified(x))\nAslant(adorne) and Point(adorne, stan) -> Awaken(adorne, felicio)\nAwaken(adorne, felicio) and Awaken(adorne, valenka) -> Ware(adorne, felicio)\nforall x (Avertable(x) -> Ware(x, adorne))\nforall x (Ware(x, felicio) and Point(x, valenka) -> Ware(x, adorne))\nforall x (Sacculated(x) and Solidified(x) -> Ware(x, adorne))\nforall x (Solidified(x) -> Ware(x, stan))\n\nSolidified(stan)\n\nAutoerotic(stan) and forall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Solidified(x)) -> therefore Solidified(stan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The josee acidulate the aphrodite. The josee rebuild the aphrodite. The aphrodite is arborary. The aphrodite netmail the davon. The rhetta netmail the aphrodite. The davon is variegated. The davon rebuild the josee. The davon rebuild the rhetta. The davon netmail the josee. The davon netmail the aphrodite. If someone netmail the aphrodite and the aphrodite acidulate the davon then the aphrodite acidulate the rhetta. Green people are cliched. If the rhetta is arborary and the rhetta netmail the davon then the rhetta rebuild the josee. If the rhetta rebuild the josee and the rhetta rebuild the aphrodite then the rhetta acidulate the josee. If someone is frigid then they need the rhetta. If someone acidulate the josee and they visit the aphrodite then they need the rhetta. If someone is talky and cliched then they need the rhetta. If someone is cliched then they need the davon. The davon is not cliched.", "logic": "\nAcidulate(josee, aphrodite)\nRebuild(josee, aphrodite)\nArborary(aphrodite)\nNetmail(aphrodite, davon)\nNetmail(rhetta, aphrodite)\nVariegated(davon)\nRebuild(davon, josee)\nRebuild(davon, rhetta)\nNetmail(davon, josee)\nNetmail(davon, aphrodite)\nforall x (Netmail(x, aphrodite) and Acidulate(aphrodite, davon) -> Acidulate(aphrodite, rhetta))\nforall x (Variegated(x) -> Cliched(x))\nArborary(rhetta) and Netmail(rhetta, davon) -> Rebuild(rhetta, josee)\nRebuild(rhetta, josee) and Rebuild(rhetta, aphrodite) -> Acidulate(rhetta, josee)\nforall x (Frigid(x) -> Acidulate(x, rhetta))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, josee) and Netmail(x, aphrodite) -> Acidulate(x, rhetta))\nforall x (Talky(x) and Cliched(x) -> Acidulate(x, rhetta))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Acidulate(x, davon))\n\nnot Cliched(davon)\n\nVariegated(davon) and forall x (Variegated(x) -> Cliched(x)) -> therefore Cliched(davon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The traver recommit the vina. The traver source the vina. The vina is bowlegged. The vina retain the cristabel. The enrika retain the vina. The cristabel is blanket. The cristabel source the traver. The cristabel source the enrika. The cristabel retain the traver. The cristabel retain the vina. If someone retain the vina and the vina recommit the cristabel then the vina recommit the enrika. Green people are cretaceous. If the enrika is bowlegged and the enrika retain the cristabel then the enrika source the traver. If the enrika source the traver and the enrika source the vina then the enrika recommit the traver. If someone is trilateral then they need the enrika. If someone recommit the traver and they visit the vina then they need the enrika. If someone is lifelike and cretaceous then they need the enrika. If someone is cretaceous then they need the cristabel. The cristabel recommit the cristabel.", "logic": "\nRecommit(traver, vina)\nSource(traver, vina)\nBowlegged(vina)\nRetain(vina, cristabel)\nRetain(enrika, vina)\nBlanket(cristabel)\nSource(cristabel, traver)\nSource(cristabel, enrika)\nRetain(cristabel, traver)\nRetain(cristabel, vina)\nforall x (Retain(x, vina) and Recommit(vina, cristabel) -> Recommit(vina, enrika))\nforall x (Blanket(x) -> Cretaceous(x))\nBowlegged(enrika) and Retain(enrika, cristabel) -> Source(enrika, traver)\nSource(enrika, traver) and Source(enrika, vina) -> Recommit(enrika, traver)\nforall x (Trilateral(x) -> Recommit(x, enrika))\nforall x (Recommit(x, traver) and Retain(x, vina) -> Recommit(x, enrika))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Cretaceous(x) -> Recommit(x, enrika))\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) -> Recommit(x, cristabel))\n\nRecommit(cristabel, cristabel)\n\nBlanket(cristabel) and forall x (Blanket(x) -> Cretaceous(x)) -> therefore Cretaceous(cristabel) Cretaceous(cristabel) and forall x (Cretaceous(x) -> Recommit(x, cristabel)) -> therefore Recommit(cristabel, cristabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The annora constrain the koren. The annora altercate the koren. The koren is earnest. The koren tally the noel. The roxane tally the koren. The noel is covalent. The noel altercate the annora. The noel altercate the roxane. The noel tally the annora. The noel tally the koren. If someone tally the koren and the koren constrain the noel then the koren constrain the roxane. Green people are mourning. If the roxane is earnest and the roxane tally the noel then the roxane altercate the annora. If the roxane altercate the annora and the roxane altercate the koren then the roxane constrain the annora. If someone is nontaxable then they need the roxane. If someone constrain the annora and they visit the koren then they need the roxane. If someone is dissenting and mourning then they need the roxane. If someone is mourning then they need the noel. The noel does not need the noel.", "logic": "\nConstrain(annora, koren)\nAltercate(annora, koren)\nEarnest(koren)\nTally(koren, noel)\nTally(roxane, koren)\nCovalent(noel)\nAltercate(noel, annora)\nAltercate(noel, roxane)\nTally(noel, annora)\nTally(noel, koren)\nforall x (Tally(x, koren) and Constrain(koren, noel) -> Constrain(koren, roxane))\nforall x (Covalent(x) -> Mourning(x))\nEarnest(roxane) and Tally(roxane, noel) -> Altercate(roxane, annora)\nAltercate(roxane, annora) and Altercate(roxane, koren) -> Constrain(roxane, annora)\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) -> Constrain(x, roxane))\nforall x (Constrain(x, annora) and Tally(x, koren) -> Constrain(x, roxane))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) and Mourning(x) -> Constrain(x, roxane))\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Constrain(x, noel))\n\nnot Constrain(noel, noel)\n\nCovalent(noel) and forall x (Covalent(x) -> Mourning(x)) -> therefore Mourning(noel) Mourning(noel) and forall x (Mourning(x) -> Constrain(x, noel)) -> therefore Constrain(noel, noel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The janetta charcoal the lotta. The janetta abduct the lotta. The lotta is expansile. The lotta redden the roxana. The royce redden the lotta. The roxana is recovered. The roxana abduct the janetta. The roxana abduct the royce. The roxana redden the janetta. The roxana redden the lotta. If someone redden the lotta and the lotta charcoal the roxana then the lotta charcoal the royce. Green people are frivolous. If the royce is expansile and the royce redden the roxana then the royce abduct the janetta. If the royce abduct the janetta and the royce abduct the lotta then the royce charcoal the janetta. If someone is screechy then they need the royce. If someone charcoal the janetta and they visit the lotta then they need the royce. If someone is branching and frivolous then they need the royce. If someone is frivolous then they need the roxana. The royce is not frivolous.", "logic": "\nCharcoal(janetta, lotta)\nAbduct(janetta, lotta)\nExpansile(lotta)\nRedden(lotta, roxana)\nRedden(royce, lotta)\nRecovered(roxana)\nAbduct(roxana, janetta)\nAbduct(roxana, royce)\nRedden(roxana, janetta)\nRedden(roxana, lotta)\nforall x (Redden(x, lotta) and Charcoal(lotta, roxana) -> Charcoal(lotta, royce))\nforall x (Recovered(x) -> Frivolous(x))\nExpansile(royce) and Redden(royce, roxana) -> Abduct(royce, janetta)\nAbduct(royce, janetta) and Abduct(royce, lotta) -> Charcoal(royce, janetta)\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Charcoal(x, royce))\nforall x (Charcoal(x, janetta) and Redden(x, lotta) -> Charcoal(x, royce))\nforall x (Branching(x) and Frivolous(x) -> Charcoal(x, royce))\nforall x (Frivolous(x) -> Charcoal(x, roxana))\n\nnot Frivolous(royce)\n\nforall x (Recovered(x) -> Frivolous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The sigmund unmask the joell. The sigmund skew the joell. The joell is undismayed. The joell warrant the sarina. The mercy warrant the joell. The sarina is lumpish. The sarina skew the sigmund. The sarina skew the mercy. The sarina warrant the sigmund. The sarina warrant the joell. If someone warrant the joell and the joell unmask the sarina then the joell unmask the mercy. Green people are scapose. If the mercy is undismayed and the mercy warrant the sarina then the mercy skew the sigmund. If the mercy skew the sigmund and the mercy skew the joell then the mercy unmask the sigmund. If someone is maniclike then they need the mercy. If someone unmask the sigmund and they visit the joell then they need the mercy. If someone is southeast and scapose then they need the mercy. If someone is scapose then they need the sarina. The joell unmask the mercy.", "logic": "\nUnmask(sigmund, joell)\nSkew(sigmund, joell)\nUndismayed(joell)\nWarrant(joell, sarina)\nWarrant(mercy, joell)\nLumpish(sarina)\nSkew(sarina, sigmund)\nSkew(sarina, mercy)\nWarrant(sarina, sigmund)\nWarrant(sarina, joell)\nforall x (Warrant(x, joell) and Unmask(joell, sarina) -> Unmask(joell, mercy))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Scapose(x))\nUndismayed(mercy) and Warrant(mercy, sarina) -> Skew(mercy, sigmund)\nSkew(mercy, sigmund) and Skew(mercy, joell) -> Unmask(mercy, sigmund)\nforall x (Maniclike(x) -> Unmask(x, mercy))\nforall x (Unmask(x, sigmund) and Warrant(x, joell) -> Unmask(x, mercy))\nforall x (Southeast(x) and Scapose(x) -> Unmask(x, mercy))\nforall x (Scapose(x) -> Unmask(x, sarina))\n\nUnmask(joell, mercy)\n\nforall x (Warrant(x, joell) and Unmask(joell, sarina) -> Unmask(joell, mercy)) <- forall x (Scapose(x) -> Unmask(x, sarina)) <- forall x (Lumpish(x) -> Scapose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The annette enfilade the ferdinand. The annette refit the ferdinand. The ferdinand is godless. The ferdinand gasify the nerissa. The martha gasify the ferdinand. The nerissa is numerate. The nerissa refit the annette. The nerissa refit the martha. The nerissa gasify the annette. The nerissa gasify the ferdinand. If someone gasify the ferdinand and the ferdinand enfilade the nerissa then the ferdinand enfilade the martha. Green people are uncritical. If the martha is godless and the martha gasify the nerissa then the martha refit the annette. If the martha refit the annette and the martha refit the ferdinand then the martha enfilade the annette. If someone is promising then they need the martha. If someone enfilade the annette and they visit the ferdinand then they need the martha. If someone is adamantine and uncritical then they need the martha. If someone is uncritical then they need the nerissa. The martha does not need the nerissa.", "logic": "\nEnfilade(annette, ferdinand)\nRefit(annette, ferdinand)\nGodless(ferdinand)\nGasify(ferdinand, nerissa)\nGasify(martha, ferdinand)\nNumerate(nerissa)\nRefit(nerissa, annette)\nRefit(nerissa, martha)\nGasify(nerissa, annette)\nGasify(nerissa, ferdinand)\nforall x (Gasify(x, ferdinand) and Enfilade(ferdinand, nerissa) -> Enfilade(ferdinand, martha))\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> Uncritical(x))\nGodless(martha) and Gasify(martha, nerissa) -> Refit(martha, annette)\nRefit(martha, annette) and Refit(martha, ferdinand) -> Enfilade(martha, annette)\nforall x (Promising(x) -> Enfilade(x, martha))\nforall x (Enfilade(x, annette) and Gasify(x, ferdinand) -> Enfilade(x, martha))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) and Uncritical(x) -> Enfilade(x, martha))\nforall x (Uncritical(x) -> Enfilade(x, nerissa))\n\nnot Enfilade(martha, nerissa)\n\nforall x (Uncritical(x) -> Enfilade(x, nerissa)) <- forall x (Numerate(x) -> Uncritical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The corinne throttle the elise. The corinne sabre the elise. The elise is summery. The elise obligate the egbert. The ashlee obligate the elise. The egbert is iranian. The egbert sabre the corinne. The egbert sabre the ashlee. The egbert obligate the corinne. The egbert obligate the elise. If someone obligate the elise and the elise throttle the egbert then the elise throttle the ashlee. Green people are beforehand. If the ashlee is summery and the ashlee obligate the egbert then the ashlee sabre the corinne. If the ashlee sabre the corinne and the ashlee sabre the elise then the ashlee throttle the corinne. If someone is commensal then they need the ashlee. If someone throttle the corinne and they visit the elise then they need the ashlee. If someone is maoist and beforehand then they need the ashlee. If someone is beforehand then they need the egbert. The egbert obligate the ashlee.", "logic": "\nThrottle(corinne, elise)\nSabre(corinne, elise)\nSummery(elise)\nObligate(elise, egbert)\nObligate(ashlee, elise)\nIranian(egbert)\nSabre(egbert, corinne)\nSabre(egbert, ashlee)\nObligate(egbert, corinne)\nObligate(egbert, elise)\nforall x (Obligate(x, elise) and Throttle(elise, egbert) -> Throttle(elise, ashlee))\nforall x (Iranian(x) -> Beforehand(x))\nSummery(ashlee) and Obligate(ashlee, egbert) -> Sabre(ashlee, corinne)\nSabre(ashlee, corinne) and Sabre(ashlee, elise) -> Throttle(ashlee, corinne)\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Throttle(x, ashlee))\nforall x (Throttle(x, corinne) and Obligate(x, elise) -> Throttle(x, ashlee))\nforall x (Maoist(x) and Beforehand(x) -> Throttle(x, ashlee))\nforall x (Beforehand(x) -> Throttle(x, egbert))\n\nObligate(egbert, ashlee)\n\nObligate(egbert, ashlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The marrilee osculate the kenton. The marrilee brown the kenton. The kenton is whispering. The kenton shrink the stephanus. The roxie shrink the kenton. The stephanus is unfree. The stephanus brown the marrilee. The stephanus brown the roxie. The stephanus shrink the marrilee. The stephanus shrink the kenton. If someone shrink the kenton and the kenton osculate the stephanus then the kenton osculate the roxie. Green people are inert. If the roxie is whispering and the roxie shrink the stephanus then the roxie brown the marrilee. If the roxie brown the marrilee and the roxie brown the kenton then the roxie osculate the marrilee. If someone is unhinged then they need the roxie. If someone osculate the marrilee and they visit the kenton then they need the roxie. If someone is tuppeny and inert then they need the roxie. If someone is inert then they need the stephanus. The kenton is not tuppeny.", "logic": "\nOsculate(marrilee, kenton)\nBrown(marrilee, kenton)\nWhispering(kenton)\nShrink(kenton, stephanus)\nShrink(roxie, kenton)\nUnfree(stephanus)\nBrown(stephanus, marrilee)\nBrown(stephanus, roxie)\nShrink(stephanus, marrilee)\nShrink(stephanus, kenton)\nforall x (Shrink(x, kenton) and Osculate(kenton, stephanus) -> Osculate(kenton, roxie))\nforall x (Unfree(x) -> Inert(x))\nWhispering(roxie) and Shrink(roxie, stephanus) -> Brown(roxie, marrilee)\nBrown(roxie, marrilee) and Brown(roxie, kenton) -> Osculate(roxie, marrilee)\nforall x (Unhinged(x) -> Osculate(x, roxie))\nforall x (Osculate(x, marrilee) and Shrink(x, kenton) -> Osculate(x, roxie))\nforall x (Tuppeny(x) and Inert(x) -> Osculate(x, roxie))\nforall x (Inert(x) -> Osculate(x, stephanus))\n\nnot Tuppeny(kenton)\n\nnot Tuppeny(kenton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The rebe electrify the corinna. The rebe railroad the corinna. The corinna is tongued. The corinna prop the lyndsie. The idalia prop the corinna. The lyndsie is malicious. The lyndsie railroad the rebe. The lyndsie railroad the idalia. The lyndsie prop the rebe. The lyndsie prop the corinna. If someone prop the corinna and the corinna electrify the lyndsie then the corinna electrify the idalia. Green people are astringent. If the idalia is tongued and the idalia prop the lyndsie then the idalia railroad the rebe. If the idalia railroad the rebe and the idalia railroad the corinna then the idalia electrify the rebe. If someone is lxxxiii then they need the idalia. If someone electrify the rebe and they visit the corinna then they need the idalia. If someone is branched and astringent then they need the idalia. If someone is astringent then they need the lyndsie. The rebe electrify the rebe.", "logic": "\nElectrify(rebe, corinna)\nRailroad(rebe, corinna)\nTongued(corinna)\nProp(corinna, lyndsie)\nProp(idalia, corinna)\nMalicious(lyndsie)\nRailroad(lyndsie, rebe)\nRailroad(lyndsie, idalia)\nProp(lyndsie, rebe)\nProp(lyndsie, corinna)\nforall x (Prop(x, corinna) and Electrify(corinna, lyndsie) -> Electrify(corinna, idalia))\nforall x (Malicious(x) -> Astringent(x))\nTongued(idalia) and Prop(idalia, lyndsie) -> Railroad(idalia, rebe)\nRailroad(idalia, rebe) and Railroad(idalia, corinna) -> Electrify(idalia, rebe)\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) -> Electrify(x, idalia))\nforall x (Electrify(x, rebe) and Prop(x, corinna) -> Electrify(x, idalia))\nforall x (Branched(x) and Astringent(x) -> Electrify(x, idalia))\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> Electrify(x, lyndsie))\n\nElectrify(rebe, rebe)\n\nElectrify(rebe, rebe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-163"} {"premises": "The carlita does not chase the russ. The russ crash the carlita. The russ is dislikable. If someone pretermit the carlita then they like the carlita. If someone crash the carlita then they eat the carlita. The russ is dislikable.", "logic": "\nnot Crash(carlita, russ)\nCrash(russ, carlita)\nDislikable(russ)\nforall x (Pretermit(x, carlita) -> Jackknife(x, carlita))\nforall x (Crash(x, carlita) -> Pretermit(x, carlita))\n\nDislikable(russ)\n\ntherefore Dislikable(russ)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The helaina does not chase the nert. The nert monetize the helaina. The nert is algoid. If someone unyoke the helaina then they like the helaina. If someone monetize the helaina then they eat the helaina. The nert does not chase the helaina.", "logic": "\nnot Monetize(helaina, nert)\nMonetize(nert, helaina)\nAlgoid(nert)\nforall x (Unyoke(x, helaina) -> Roost(x, helaina))\nforall x (Monetize(x, helaina) -> Unyoke(x, helaina))\n\nnot Monetize(nert, helaina)\n\ntherefore Monetize(nert, helaina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The othello does not chase the marchall. The marchall yield the othello. The marchall is dioestrual. If someone profit the othello then they like the othello. If someone yield the othello then they eat the othello. The marchall profit the othello.", "logic": "\nnot Yield(othello, marchall)\nYield(marchall, othello)\nDioestrual(marchall)\nforall x (Profit(x, othello) -> Clomp(x, othello))\nforall x (Yield(x, othello) -> Profit(x, othello))\n\nProfit(marchall, othello)\n\nYield(marchall, othello) and forall x (Yield(x, othello) -> Profit(x, othello)) -> therefore Profit(marchall, othello)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The izzy does not chase the jehanna. The jehanna nitrate the izzy. The jehanna is unobliging. If someone proclaim the izzy then they like the izzy. If someone nitrate the izzy then they eat the izzy. The jehanna does not eat the izzy.", "logic": "\nnot Nitrate(izzy, jehanna)\nNitrate(jehanna, izzy)\nUnobliging(jehanna)\nforall x (Proclaim(x, izzy) -> Palter(x, izzy))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, izzy) -> Proclaim(x, izzy))\n\nnot Proclaim(jehanna, izzy)\n\nNitrate(jehanna, izzy) and forall x (Nitrate(x, izzy) -> Proclaim(x, izzy)) -> therefore Proclaim(jehanna, izzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The bertrand does not chase the reina. The reina holystone the bertrand. The reina is quickset. If someone alchemise the bertrand then they like the bertrand. If someone holystone the bertrand then they eat the bertrand. The reina unicycle the bertrand.", "logic": "\nnot Holystone(bertrand, reina)\nHolystone(reina, bertrand)\nQuickset(reina)\nforall x (Alchemise(x, bertrand) -> Unicycle(x, bertrand))\nforall x (Holystone(x, bertrand) -> Alchemise(x, bertrand))\n\nUnicycle(reina, bertrand)\n\nHolystone(reina, bertrand) and forall x (Holystone(x, bertrand) -> Alchemise(x, bertrand)) -> therefore Alchemise(reina, bertrand) Alchemise(reina, bertrand) and forall x (Alchemise(x, bertrand) -> Unicycle(x, bertrand)) -> therefore Unicycle(reina, bertrand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The desdemona does not chase the dorian. The dorian misally the desdemona. The dorian is unawed. If someone concord the desdemona then they like the desdemona. If someone misally the desdemona then they eat the desdemona. The dorian does not like the desdemona.", "logic": "\nnot Misally(desdemona, dorian)\nMisally(dorian, desdemona)\nUnawed(dorian)\nforall x (Concord(x, desdemona) -> Blackleg(x, desdemona))\nforall x (Misally(x, desdemona) -> Concord(x, desdemona))\n\nnot Blackleg(dorian, desdemona)\n\nMisally(dorian, desdemona) and forall x (Misally(x, desdemona) -> Concord(x, desdemona)) -> therefore Concord(dorian, desdemona) Concord(dorian, desdemona) and forall x (Concord(x, desdemona) -> Blackleg(x, desdemona)) -> therefore Blackleg(dorian, desdemona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The cordey does not chase the halvard. The halvard tickle the cordey. The halvard is angled. If someone reenact the cordey then they like the cordey. If someone tickle the cordey then they eat the cordey. The cordey does not eat the cordey.", "logic": "\nnot Tickle(cordey, halvard)\nTickle(halvard, cordey)\nAngled(halvard)\nforall x (Reenact(x, cordey) -> Humiliate(x, cordey))\nforall x (Tickle(x, cordey) -> Reenact(x, cordey))\n\nnot Reenact(cordey, cordey)\n\nforall x (Tickle(x, cordey) -> Reenact(x, cordey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The rory does not chase the adolphe. The adolphe canopy the rory. The adolphe is most. If someone sport the rory then they like the rory. If someone canopy the rory then they eat the rory. The rory batfowl the rory.", "logic": "\nnot Canopy(rory, adolphe)\nCanopy(adolphe, rory)\nMost(adolphe)\nforall x (Sport(x, rory) -> Batfowl(x, rory))\nforall x (Canopy(x, rory) -> Sport(x, rory))\n\nBatfowl(rory, rory)\n\nforall x (Sport(x, rory) -> Batfowl(x, rory)) <- forall x (Canopy(x, rory) -> Sport(x, rory)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The ollie does not chase the dimitrou. The dimitrou redecorate the ollie. The dimitrou is bicorned. If someone necrose the ollie then they like the ollie. If someone redecorate the ollie then they eat the ollie. The dimitrou is not red.", "logic": "\nnot Redecorate(ollie, dimitrou)\nRedecorate(dimitrou, ollie)\nBicorned(dimitrou)\nforall x (Necrose(x, ollie) -> Detox(x, ollie))\nforall x (Redecorate(x, ollie) -> Necrose(x, ollie))\n\nnot Red(dimitrou)\n\nnot Red(dimitrou) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The nanice does not chase the aimee. The aimee stipulate the nanice. The aimee is pianistic. If someone govern the nanice then they like the nanice. If someone stipulate the nanice then they eat the nanice. The aimee stipulate the aimee.", "logic": "\nnot Stipulate(nanice, aimee)\nStipulate(aimee, nanice)\nPianistic(aimee)\nforall x (Govern(x, nanice) -> Plague(x, nanice))\nforall x (Stipulate(x, nanice) -> Govern(x, nanice))\n\nStipulate(aimee, aimee)\n\nStipulate(aimee, aimee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The roderick does not chase the bee. The bee plain the roderick. The bee is marly. If someone inculcate the roderick then they like the roderick. If someone plain the roderick then they eat the roderick. The roderick is not marly.", "logic": "\nnot Plain(roderick, bee)\nPlain(bee, roderick)\nMarly(bee)\nforall x (Inculcate(x, roderick) -> Toddle(x, roderick))\nforall x (Plain(x, roderick) -> Inculcate(x, roderick))\n\nnot Marly(roderick)\n\nnot Marly(roderick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The rex does not chase the petrina. The petrina metallize the rex. The petrina is downcast. If someone rewrite the rex then they like the rex. If someone metallize the rex then they eat the rex. The petrina is cold.", "logic": "\nnot Metallize(rex, petrina)\nMetallize(petrina, rex)\nDowncast(petrina)\nforall x (Rewrite(x, rex) -> Cock(x, rex))\nforall x (Metallize(x, rex) -> Rewrite(x, rex))\n\nCold(petrina)\n\nCold(petrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-58"} {"premises": "The oprah cooperate the eben. The eben cooperate the caleb. The eben is interior. The eben is enduring. The eben samba the jewel. The jewel cooperate the eben. The caleb samba the jewel. All interior things are selfish. If something is selfish then it dehorn the caleb. The caleb samba the jewel.", "logic": "\nCooperate(oprah, eben)\nCooperate(eben, caleb)\nInterior(eben)\nEnduring(eben)\nSamba(eben, jewel)\nCooperate(jewel, eben)\nSamba(caleb, jewel)\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Selfish(x) -> Dehorn(x, caleb))\n\nSamba(caleb, jewel)\n\ntherefore Samba(caleb, jewel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The katy assign the cameo. The cameo assign the cammy. The cameo is asleep. The cameo is easygoing. The cameo develop the desmond. The desmond assign the cameo. The cammy develop the desmond. All asleep things are vagrant. If something is vagrant then it foregather the cammy. The cammy does not visit the desmond.", "logic": "\nAssign(katy, cameo)\nAssign(cameo, cammy)\nAsleep(cameo)\nEasygoing(cameo)\nDevelop(cameo, desmond)\nAssign(desmond, cameo)\nDevelop(cammy, desmond)\nforall x (Asleep(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) -> Foregather(x, cammy))\n\nnot Develop(cammy, desmond)\n\ntherefore Develop(cammy, desmond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The ferd malnourish the waylan. The waylan malnourish the emelyne. The waylan is protrusive. The waylan is rapacious. The waylan fireproof the gordon. The gordon malnourish the waylan. The emelyne fireproof the gordon. All protrusive things are byzantine. If something is byzantine then it damp the emelyne. The waylan is byzantine.", "logic": "\nMalnourish(ferd, waylan)\nMalnourish(waylan, emelyne)\nProtrusive(waylan)\nRapacious(waylan)\nFireproof(waylan, gordon)\nMalnourish(gordon, waylan)\nFireproof(emelyne, gordon)\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Byzantine(x))\nforall x (Byzantine(x) -> Damp(x, emelyne))\n\nByzantine(waylan)\n\nProtrusive(waylan) and forall x (Protrusive(x) -> Byzantine(x)) -> therefore Byzantine(waylan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The bailie placate the pearce. The pearce placate the jori. The pearce is thrillful. The pearce is occult. The pearce produce the nicholle. The nicholle placate the pearce. The jori produce the nicholle. All thrillful things are mythical. If something is mythical then it squeak the jori. The pearce is not mythical.", "logic": "\nPlacate(bailie, pearce)\nPlacate(pearce, jori)\nThrillful(pearce)\nOccult(pearce)\nProduce(pearce, nicholle)\nPlacate(nicholle, pearce)\nProduce(jori, nicholle)\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Mythical(x))\nforall x (Mythical(x) -> Squeak(x, jori))\n\nnot Mythical(pearce)\n\nThrillful(pearce) and forall x (Thrillful(x) -> Mythical(x)) -> therefore Mythical(pearce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The selia federalize the nathalie. The nathalie federalize the wakefield. The nathalie is lofty. The nathalie is orbital. The nathalie paraphrase the maude. The maude federalize the nathalie. The wakefield paraphrase the maude. All lofty things are endangered. If something is endangered then it farm the wakefield. The nathalie farm the wakefield.", "logic": "\nFederalize(selia, nathalie)\nFederalize(nathalie, wakefield)\nLofty(nathalie)\nOrbital(nathalie)\nParaphrase(nathalie, maude)\nFederalize(maude, nathalie)\nParaphrase(wakefield, maude)\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Endangered(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) -> Farm(x, wakefield))\n\nFarm(nathalie, wakefield)\n\nLofty(nathalie) and forall x (Lofty(x) -> Endangered(x)) -> therefore Endangered(nathalie) Endangered(nathalie) and forall x (Endangered(x) -> Farm(x, wakefield)) -> therefore Farm(nathalie, wakefield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The florrie anodize the ulises. The ulises anodize the sarette. The ulises is juxtaposed. The ulises is sceptred. The ulises slice the ellissa. The ellissa anodize the ulises. The sarette slice the ellissa. All juxtaposed things are walloping. If something is walloping then it encourage the sarette. The ulises does not like the sarette.", "logic": "\nAnodize(florrie, ulises)\nAnodize(ulises, sarette)\nJuxtaposed(ulises)\nSceptred(ulises)\nSlice(ulises, ellissa)\nAnodize(ellissa, ulises)\nSlice(sarette, ellissa)\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Walloping(x))\nforall x (Walloping(x) -> Encourage(x, sarette))\n\nnot Encourage(ulises, sarette)\n\nJuxtaposed(ulises) and forall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Walloping(x)) -> therefore Walloping(ulises) Walloping(ulises) and forall x (Walloping(x) -> Encourage(x, sarette)) -> therefore Encourage(ulises, sarette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The desdemona assemble the laurent. The laurent assemble the wilber. The laurent is unrhythmic. The laurent is singing. The laurent overtire the letty. The letty assemble the laurent. The wilber overtire the letty. All unrhythmic things are dipterous. If something is dipterous then it amount the wilber. The wilber is not dipterous.", "logic": "\nAssemble(desdemona, laurent)\nAssemble(laurent, wilber)\nUnrhythmic(laurent)\nSinging(laurent)\nOvertire(laurent, letty)\nAssemble(letty, laurent)\nOvertire(wilber, letty)\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) -> Dipterous(x))\nforall x (Dipterous(x) -> Amount(x, wilber))\n\nnot Dipterous(wilber)\n\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) -> Dipterous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The allah preempt the carmen. The carmen preempt the mersey. The carmen is calceiform. The carmen is defeasible. The carmen serialize the nanice. The nanice preempt the carmen. The mersey serialize the nanice. All calceiform things are filthy. If something is filthy then it trump the mersey. The nanice trump the mersey.", "logic": "\nPreempt(allah, carmen)\nPreempt(carmen, mersey)\nCalceiform(carmen)\nDefeasible(carmen)\nSerialize(carmen, nanice)\nPreempt(nanice, carmen)\nSerialize(mersey, nanice)\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) -> Trump(x, mersey))\n\nTrump(nanice, mersey)\n\nforall x (Filthy(x) -> Trump(x, mersey)) <- forall x (Calceiform(x) -> Filthy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The fredi nestle the laura. The laura nestle the roselle. The laura is precocious. The laura is staple. The laura reject the francesco. The francesco nestle the laura. The roselle reject the francesco. All precocious things are gorgeous. If something is gorgeous then it corrode the roselle. The francesco is not gorgeous.", "logic": "\nNestle(fredi, laura)\nNestle(laura, roselle)\nPrecocious(laura)\nStaple(laura)\nReject(laura, francesco)\nNestle(francesco, laura)\nReject(roselle, francesco)\nforall x (Precocious(x) -> Gorgeous(x))\nforall x (Gorgeous(x) -> Corrode(x, roselle))\n\nnot Gorgeous(francesco)\n\nforall x (Precocious(x) -> Gorgeous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The wat womanise the oprah. The oprah womanise the herschel. The oprah is ungreased. The oprah is pauline. The oprah bust the koren. The koren womanise the oprah. The herschel bust the koren. All ungreased things are just. If something is just then it spread the herschel. The herschel womanise the oprah.", "logic": "\nWomanise(wat, oprah)\nWomanise(oprah, herschel)\nUngreased(oprah)\nPauline(oprah)\nBust(oprah, koren)\nWomanise(koren, oprah)\nBust(herschel, koren)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> Just(x))\nforall x (Just(x) -> Spread(x, herschel))\n\nWomanise(herschel, oprah)\n\nWomanise(herschel, oprah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The reece slow the matty. The matty slow the buster. The matty is pathless. The matty is diabetic. The matty reaffirm the davita. The davita slow the matty. The buster reaffirm the davita. All pathless things are hematal. If something is hematal then it flux the buster. The buster does not chase the davita.", "logic": "\nSlow(reece, matty)\nSlow(matty, buster)\nPathless(matty)\nDiabetic(matty)\nReaffirm(matty, davita)\nSlow(davita, matty)\nReaffirm(buster, davita)\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Hematal(x) -> Flux(x, buster))\n\nnot Slow(buster, davita)\n\nnot Slow(buster, davita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The gerti regorge the selia. The selia regorge the chantalle. The selia is grouped. The selia is liquescent. The selia cross the thaddius. The thaddius regorge the selia. The chantalle cross the thaddius. All grouped things are dolourous. If something is dolourous then it haunt the chantalle. The gerti is grouped.", "logic": "\nRegorge(gerti, selia)\nRegorge(selia, chantalle)\nGrouped(selia)\nLiquescent(selia)\nCross(selia, thaddius)\nRegorge(thaddius, selia)\nCross(chantalle, thaddius)\nforall x (Grouped(x) -> Dolourous(x))\nforall x (Dolourous(x) -> Haunt(x, chantalle))\n\nGrouped(gerti)\n\nGrouped(gerti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2000"} {"premises": "The waldo is oncoming. The waldo brocade the serene. The waldo becalm the serene. The waldo grumble the serene. The serene is muddled. The serene brocade the waldo. The serene grumble the waldo. If something becalm the serene then it brocade the waldo. If something becalm the waldo then the waldo brocade the serene. If something brocade the waldo then it grumble the waldo. The serene grumble the waldo.", "logic": "\nOncoming(waldo)\nBrocade(waldo, serene)\nBecalm(waldo, serene)\nGrumble(waldo, serene)\nMuddled(serene)\nBrocade(serene, waldo)\nGrumble(serene, waldo)\nforall x (Becalm(x, serene) -> Brocade(x, waldo))\nforall x (Becalm(x, waldo) -> Brocade(waldo, serene))\nforall x (Brocade(x, waldo) -> Grumble(x, waldo))\n\nGrumble(serene, waldo)\n\ntherefore Grumble(serene, waldo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The robinet is occasional. The robinet delimitate the dian. The robinet uprise the dian. The robinet plow the dian. The dian is correlated. The dian delimitate the robinet. The dian plow the robinet. If something uprise the dian then it delimitate the robinet. If something uprise the robinet then the robinet delimitate the dian. If something delimitate the robinet then it plow the robinet. The robinet does not see the dian.", "logic": "\nOccasional(robinet)\nDelimitate(robinet, dian)\nUprise(robinet, dian)\nPlow(robinet, dian)\nCorrelated(dian)\nDelimitate(dian, robinet)\nPlow(dian, robinet)\nforall x (Uprise(x, dian) -> Delimitate(x, robinet))\nforall x (Uprise(x, robinet) -> Delimitate(robinet, dian))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, robinet) -> Plow(x, robinet))\n\nnot Uprise(robinet, dian)\n\ntherefore Uprise(robinet, dian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The sigmund is supportive. The sigmund bale the valentine. The sigmund moisturize the valentine. The sigmund spat the valentine. The valentine is horrible. The valentine bale the sigmund. The valentine spat the sigmund. If something moisturize the valentine then it bale the sigmund. If something moisturize the sigmund then the sigmund bale the valentine. If something bale the sigmund then it spat the sigmund. The sigmund bale the sigmund.", "logic": "\nSupportive(sigmund)\nBale(sigmund, valentine)\nMoisturize(sigmund, valentine)\nSpat(sigmund, valentine)\nHorrible(valentine)\nBale(valentine, sigmund)\nSpat(valentine, sigmund)\nforall x (Moisturize(x, valentine) -> Bale(x, sigmund))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, sigmund) -> Bale(sigmund, valentine))\nforall x (Bale(x, sigmund) -> Spat(x, sigmund))\n\nBale(sigmund, sigmund)\n\nMoisturize(sigmund, valentine) and forall x (Moisturize(x, valentine) -> Bale(x, sigmund)) -> therefore Bale(sigmund, sigmund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The janetta is punishable. The janetta paddle the ida. The janetta endear the ida. The janetta neutralise the ida. The ida is endowed. The ida paddle the janetta. The ida neutralise the janetta. If something endear the ida then it paddle the janetta. If something endear the janetta then the janetta paddle the ida. If something paddle the janetta then it neutralise the janetta. The janetta does not need the janetta.", "logic": "\nPunishable(janetta)\nPaddle(janetta, ida)\nEndear(janetta, ida)\nNeutralise(janetta, ida)\nEndowed(ida)\nPaddle(ida, janetta)\nNeutralise(ida, janetta)\nforall x (Endear(x, ida) -> Paddle(x, janetta))\nforall x (Endear(x, janetta) -> Paddle(janetta, ida))\nforall x (Paddle(x, janetta) -> Neutralise(x, janetta))\n\nnot Paddle(janetta, janetta)\n\nEndear(janetta, ida) and forall x (Endear(x, ida) -> Paddle(x, janetta)) -> therefore Paddle(janetta, janetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The tomiko is indirect. The tomiko subdivide the sarah. The tomiko reposit the sarah. The tomiko ground the sarah. The sarah is lyonnaise. The sarah subdivide the tomiko. The sarah ground the tomiko. If something reposit the sarah then it subdivide the tomiko. If something reposit the tomiko then the tomiko subdivide the sarah. If something subdivide the tomiko then it ground the tomiko. The tomiko ground the tomiko.", "logic": "\nIndirect(tomiko)\nSubdivide(tomiko, sarah)\nReposit(tomiko, sarah)\nGround(tomiko, sarah)\nLyonnaise(sarah)\nSubdivide(sarah, tomiko)\nGround(sarah, tomiko)\nforall x (Reposit(x, sarah) -> Subdivide(x, tomiko))\nforall x (Reposit(x, tomiko) -> Subdivide(tomiko, sarah))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, tomiko) -> Ground(x, tomiko))\n\nGround(tomiko, tomiko)\n\nReposit(tomiko, sarah) and forall x (Reposit(x, sarah) -> Subdivide(x, tomiko)) -> therefore Subdivide(tomiko, tomiko) Subdivide(tomiko, tomiko) and forall x (Subdivide(x, tomiko) -> Ground(x, tomiko)) -> therefore Ground(tomiko, tomiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The laurette is strung. The laurette binge the lin. The laurette dogfight the lin. The laurette nick the lin. The lin is javanese. The lin binge the laurette. The lin nick the laurette. If something dogfight the lin then it binge the laurette. If something dogfight the laurette then the laurette binge the lin. If something binge the laurette then it nick the laurette. The laurette does not visit the laurette.", "logic": "\nStrung(laurette)\nBinge(laurette, lin)\nDogfight(laurette, lin)\nNick(laurette, lin)\nJavanese(lin)\nBinge(lin, laurette)\nNick(lin, laurette)\nforall x (Dogfight(x, lin) -> Binge(x, laurette))\nforall x (Dogfight(x, laurette) -> Binge(laurette, lin))\nforall x (Binge(x, laurette) -> Nick(x, laurette))\n\nnot Nick(laurette, laurette)\n\nDogfight(laurette, lin) and forall x (Dogfight(x, lin) -> Binge(x, laurette)) -> therefore Binge(laurette, laurette) Binge(laurette, laurette) and forall x (Binge(x, laurette) -> Nick(x, laurette)) -> therefore Nick(laurette, laurette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The jerzy is luxurious. The jerzy tyrannise the clinton. The jerzy higgle the clinton. The jerzy snub the clinton. The clinton is maltese. The clinton tyrannise the jerzy. The clinton snub the jerzy. If something higgle the clinton then it tyrannise the jerzy. If something higgle the jerzy then the jerzy tyrannise the clinton. If something tyrannise the jerzy then it snub the jerzy. The jerzy is not maltese.", "logic": "\nLuxurious(jerzy)\nTyrannise(jerzy, clinton)\nHiggle(jerzy, clinton)\nSnub(jerzy, clinton)\nMaltese(clinton)\nTyrannise(clinton, jerzy)\nSnub(clinton, jerzy)\nforall x (Higgle(x, clinton) -> Tyrannise(x, jerzy))\nforall x (Higgle(x, jerzy) -> Tyrannise(jerzy, clinton))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, jerzy) -> Snub(x, jerzy))\n\nnot Maltese(jerzy)\n\nnot Maltese(jerzy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The mugsy is balmy. The mugsy tone the silvana. The mugsy quell the silvana. The mugsy pervert the silvana. The silvana is opponent. The silvana tone the mugsy. The silvana pervert the mugsy. If something quell the silvana then it tone the mugsy. If something quell the mugsy then the mugsy tone the silvana. If something tone the mugsy then it pervert the mugsy. The mugsy quell the mugsy.", "logic": "\nBalmy(mugsy)\nTone(mugsy, silvana)\nQuell(mugsy, silvana)\nPervert(mugsy, silvana)\nOpponent(silvana)\nTone(silvana, mugsy)\nPervert(silvana, mugsy)\nforall x (Quell(x, silvana) -> Tone(x, mugsy))\nforall x (Quell(x, mugsy) -> Tone(mugsy, silvana))\nforall x (Tone(x, mugsy) -> Pervert(x, mugsy))\n\nQuell(mugsy, mugsy)\n\nQuell(mugsy, mugsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The ambrosius is ossicular. The ambrosius fleet the jacklin. The ambrosius message the jacklin. The ambrosius sojourn the jacklin. The jacklin is unicuspid. The jacklin fleet the ambrosius. The jacklin sojourn the ambrosius. If something message the jacklin then it fleet the ambrosius. If something message the ambrosius then the ambrosius fleet the jacklin. If something fleet the ambrosius then it sojourn the ambrosius. The jacklin is not ossicular.", "logic": "\nOssicular(ambrosius)\nFleet(ambrosius, jacklin)\nMessage(ambrosius, jacklin)\nSojourn(ambrosius, jacklin)\nUnicuspid(jacklin)\nFleet(jacklin, ambrosius)\nSojourn(jacklin, ambrosius)\nforall x (Message(x, jacklin) -> Fleet(x, ambrosius))\nforall x (Message(x, ambrosius) -> Fleet(ambrosius, jacklin))\nforall x (Fleet(x, ambrosius) -> Sojourn(x, ambrosius))\n\nnot Ossicular(jacklin)\n\nnot Ossicular(jacklin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The elmore is unilateral. The elmore falcon the gracie. The elmore linger the gracie. The elmore ascertain the gracie. The gracie is theist. The gracie falcon the elmore. The gracie ascertain the elmore. If something linger the gracie then it falcon the elmore. If something linger the elmore then the elmore falcon the gracie. If something falcon the elmore then it ascertain the elmore. The gracie is kind.", "logic": "\nUnilateral(elmore)\nFalcon(elmore, gracie)\nLinger(elmore, gracie)\nAscertain(elmore, gracie)\nTheist(gracie)\nFalcon(gracie, elmore)\nAscertain(gracie, elmore)\nforall x (Linger(x, gracie) -> Falcon(x, elmore))\nforall x (Linger(x, elmore) -> Falcon(elmore, gracie))\nforall x (Falcon(x, elmore) -> Ascertain(x, elmore))\n\nKind(gracie)\n\nKind(gracie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The lissie is responsive. The lissie jilt the rae. The lissie worsen the rae. The lissie whirlpool the rae. The rae is unchaste. The rae jilt the lissie. The rae whirlpool the lissie. If something worsen the rae then it jilt the lissie. If something worsen the lissie then the lissie jilt the rae. If something jilt the lissie then it whirlpool the lissie. The rae does not need the rae.", "logic": "\nResponsive(lissie)\nJilt(lissie, rae)\nWorsen(lissie, rae)\nWhirlpool(lissie, rae)\nUnchaste(rae)\nJilt(rae, lissie)\nWhirlpool(rae, lissie)\nforall x (Worsen(x, rae) -> Jilt(x, lissie))\nforall x (Worsen(x, lissie) -> Jilt(lissie, rae))\nforall x (Jilt(x, lissie) -> Whirlpool(x, lissie))\n\nnot Jilt(rae, rae)\n\nnot Jilt(rae, rae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "The etta is trendy. The etta collar the lorry. The etta miss the lorry. The etta emend the lorry. The lorry is ossified. The lorry collar the etta. The lorry emend the etta. If something miss the lorry then it collar the etta. If something miss the etta then the etta collar the lorry. If something collar the etta then it emend the etta. The lorry is nice.", "logic": "\nTrendy(etta)\nCollar(etta, lorry)\nMiss(etta, lorry)\nEmend(etta, lorry)\nOssified(lorry)\nCollar(lorry, etta)\nEmend(lorry, etta)\nforall x (Miss(x, lorry) -> Collar(x, etta))\nforall x (Miss(x, etta) -> Collar(etta, lorry))\nforall x (Collar(x, etta) -> Emend(x, etta))\n\nNice(lorry)\n\nNice(lorry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-633"} {"premises": "Almire is pilose. Almire is giddy. Almire is pinstriped. Almire is pitchy. Abbe is giddy. Abbe is pinstriped. Abbe is pitchy. Jessi is pilose. Jessi is giddy. Jessi is unitarian. Jessi is pitchy. Roana is pitchy. Cold things are unitarian. If something is pinstriped and potbellied then it is pitchy. If Almire is potbellied and Almire is unitarian then Almire is pilose. Green things are pitchy. If Jessi is pitchy and Jessi is potbellied then Jessi is pinstriped. All unitarian, pitchy things are pilose. Big things are jolted. If Abbe is jolted then Abbe is giddy. Jessi is unitarian.", "logic": "\nPilose(almire)\nGiddy(almire)\nPinstriped(almire)\nPitchy(almire)\nGiddy(abbe)\nPinstriped(abbe)\nPitchy(abbe)\nPilose(jessi)\nGiddy(jessi)\nUnitarian(jessi)\nPitchy(jessi)\nPitchy(roana)\nforall x (Jolted(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Pitchy(x))\nPotbellied(almire) and Unitarian(almire) -> Pilose(almire)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Pitchy(x))\nPitchy(jessi) and Potbellied(jessi) -> Pinstriped(jessi)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) and Pitchy(x) -> Pilose(x))\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Jolted(x))\nJolted(abbe) -> Giddy(abbe)\n\nUnitarian(jessi)\n\ntherefore Unitarian(jessi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Misha is pilous. Misha is stillborn. Misha is lubberly. Misha is sweltry. Grover is stillborn. Grover is lubberly. Grover is sweltry. Lanni is pilous. Lanni is stillborn. Lanni is woolen. Lanni is sweltry. Nerta is sweltry. Cold things are woolen. If something is lubberly and olympian then it is sweltry. If Misha is olympian and Misha is woolen then Misha is pilous. Green things are sweltry. If Lanni is sweltry and Lanni is olympian then Lanni is lubberly. All woolen, sweltry things are pilous. Big things are suffusive. If Grover is suffusive then Grover is stillborn. Misha is not stillborn.", "logic": "\nPilous(misha)\nStillborn(misha)\nLubberly(misha)\nSweltry(misha)\nStillborn(grover)\nLubberly(grover)\nSweltry(grover)\nPilous(lanni)\nStillborn(lanni)\nWoolen(lanni)\nSweltry(lanni)\nSweltry(nerta)\nforall x (Suffusive(x) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Lubberly(x) and Olympian(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nOlympian(misha) and Woolen(misha) -> Pilous(misha)\nforall x (Woolen(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nSweltry(lanni) and Olympian(lanni) -> Lubberly(lanni)\nforall x (Woolen(x) and Sweltry(x) -> Pilous(x))\nforall x (Pilous(x) -> Suffusive(x))\nSuffusive(grover) -> Stillborn(grover)\n\nnot Stillborn(misha)\n\ntherefore Stillborn(misha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Darda is spanish. Darda is buzzing. Darda is areal. Darda is adjustive. Huey is buzzing. Huey is areal. Huey is adjustive. Sheeree is spanish. Sheeree is buzzing. Sheeree is luxurious. Sheeree is adjustive. Meredith is adjustive. Cold things are luxurious. If something is areal and floppy then it is adjustive. If Darda is floppy and Darda is luxurious then Darda is spanish. Green things are adjustive. If Sheeree is adjustive and Sheeree is floppy then Sheeree is areal. All luxurious, adjustive things are spanish. Big things are illicit. If Huey is illicit then Huey is buzzing. Sheeree is illicit.", "logic": "\nSpanish(darda)\nBuzzing(darda)\nAreal(darda)\nAdjustive(darda)\nBuzzing(huey)\nAreal(huey)\nAdjustive(huey)\nSpanish(sheeree)\nBuzzing(sheeree)\nLuxurious(sheeree)\nAdjustive(sheeree)\nAdjustive(meredith)\nforall x (Illicit(x) -> Luxurious(x))\nforall x (Areal(x) and Floppy(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nFloppy(darda) and Luxurious(darda) -> Spanish(darda)\nforall x (Luxurious(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nAdjustive(sheeree) and Floppy(sheeree) -> Areal(sheeree)\nforall x (Luxurious(x) and Adjustive(x) -> Spanish(x))\nforall x (Spanish(x) -> Illicit(x))\nIllicit(huey) -> Buzzing(huey)\n\nIllicit(sheeree)\n\nSpanish(sheeree) and forall x (Spanish(x) -> Illicit(x)) -> therefore Illicit(sheeree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Trenton is abkhazian. Trenton is planate. Trenton is possessive. Trenton is synoecious. Roni is planate. Roni is possessive. Roni is synoecious. Joellyn is abkhazian. Joellyn is planate. Joellyn is austrian. Joellyn is synoecious. Ceciley is synoecious. Cold things are austrian. If something is possessive and insistent then it is synoecious. If Trenton is insistent and Trenton is austrian then Trenton is abkhazian. Green things are synoecious. If Joellyn is synoecious and Joellyn is insistent then Joellyn is possessive. All austrian, synoecious things are abkhazian. Big things are vesicatory. If Roni is vesicatory then Roni is planate. Trenton is not vesicatory.", "logic": "\nAbkhazian(trenton)\nPlanate(trenton)\nPossessive(trenton)\nSynoecious(trenton)\nPlanate(roni)\nPossessive(roni)\nSynoecious(roni)\nAbkhazian(joellyn)\nPlanate(joellyn)\nAustrian(joellyn)\nSynoecious(joellyn)\nSynoecious(ceciley)\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) -> Austrian(x))\nforall x (Possessive(x) and Insistent(x) -> Synoecious(x))\nInsistent(trenton) and Austrian(trenton) -> Abkhazian(trenton)\nforall x (Austrian(x) -> Synoecious(x))\nSynoecious(joellyn) and Insistent(joellyn) -> Possessive(joellyn)\nforall x (Austrian(x) and Synoecious(x) -> Abkhazian(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Vesicatory(x))\nVesicatory(roni) -> Planate(roni)\n\nnot Vesicatory(trenton)\n\nAbkhazian(trenton) and forall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Vesicatory(x)) -> therefore Vesicatory(trenton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Bridget is muzzy. Bridget is stupid. Bridget is offside. Bridget is biserrate. Doll is stupid. Doll is offside. Doll is biserrate. Vicky is muzzy. Vicky is stupid. Vicky is palmy. Vicky is biserrate. Jerrold is biserrate. Cold things are palmy. If something is offside and calycine then it is biserrate. If Bridget is calycine and Bridget is palmy then Bridget is muzzy. Green things are biserrate. If Vicky is biserrate and Vicky is calycine then Vicky is offside. All palmy, biserrate things are muzzy. Big things are sanative. If Doll is sanative then Doll is stupid. Bridget is palmy.", "logic": "\nMuzzy(bridget)\nStupid(bridget)\nOffside(bridget)\nBiserrate(bridget)\nStupid(doll)\nOffside(doll)\nBiserrate(doll)\nMuzzy(vicky)\nStupid(vicky)\nPalmy(vicky)\nBiserrate(vicky)\nBiserrate(jerrold)\nforall x (Sanative(x) -> Palmy(x))\nforall x (Offside(x) and Calycine(x) -> Biserrate(x))\nCalycine(bridget) and Palmy(bridget) -> Muzzy(bridget)\nforall x (Palmy(x) -> Biserrate(x))\nBiserrate(vicky) and Calycine(vicky) -> Offside(vicky)\nforall x (Palmy(x) and Biserrate(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Sanative(x))\nSanative(doll) -> Stupid(doll)\n\nPalmy(bridget)\n\nMuzzy(bridget) and forall x (Muzzy(x) -> Sanative(x)) -> therefore Sanative(bridget) Sanative(bridget) and forall x (Sanative(x) -> Palmy(x)) -> therefore Palmy(bridget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Maxine is befitting. Maxine is nonionic. Maxine is maoist. Maxine is moorish. Jannelle is nonionic. Jannelle is maoist. Jannelle is moorish. Joanie is befitting. Joanie is nonionic. Joanie is horny. Joanie is moorish. Galen is moorish. Cold things are horny. If something is maoist and subaqueous then it is moorish. If Maxine is subaqueous and Maxine is horny then Maxine is befitting. Green things are moorish. If Joanie is moorish and Joanie is subaqueous then Joanie is maoist. All horny, moorish things are befitting. Big things are admissible. If Jannelle is admissible then Jannelle is nonionic. Maxine is not horny.", "logic": "\nBefitting(maxine)\nNonionic(maxine)\nMaoist(maxine)\nMoorish(maxine)\nNonionic(jannelle)\nMaoist(jannelle)\nMoorish(jannelle)\nBefitting(joanie)\nNonionic(joanie)\nHorny(joanie)\nMoorish(joanie)\nMoorish(galen)\nforall x (Admissible(x) -> Horny(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) and Subaqueous(x) -> Moorish(x))\nSubaqueous(maxine) and Horny(maxine) -> Befitting(maxine)\nforall x (Horny(x) -> Moorish(x))\nMoorish(joanie) and Subaqueous(joanie) -> Maoist(joanie)\nforall x (Horny(x) and Moorish(x) -> Befitting(x))\nforall x (Befitting(x) -> Admissible(x))\nAdmissible(jannelle) -> Nonionic(jannelle)\n\nnot Horny(maxine)\n\nBefitting(maxine) and forall x (Befitting(x) -> Admissible(x)) -> therefore Admissible(maxine) Admissible(maxine) and forall x (Admissible(x) -> Horny(x)) -> therefore Horny(maxine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Millicent is outmoded. Millicent is stained. Millicent is cacodylic. Millicent is sublunar. Albertina is stained. Albertina is cacodylic. Albertina is sublunar. Tammie is outmoded. Tammie is stained. Tammie is unsexy. Tammie is sublunar. Jake is sublunar. Cold things are unsexy. If something is cacodylic and fanatical then it is sublunar. If Millicent is fanatical and Millicent is unsexy then Millicent is outmoded. Green things are sublunar. If Tammie is sublunar and Tammie is fanatical then Tammie is cacodylic. All unsexy, sublunar things are outmoded. Big things are mandatory. If Albertina is mandatory then Albertina is stained. Albertina is not unsexy.", "logic": "\nOutmoded(millicent)\nStained(millicent)\nCacodylic(millicent)\nSublunar(millicent)\nStained(albertina)\nCacodylic(albertina)\nSublunar(albertina)\nOutmoded(tammie)\nStained(tammie)\nUnsexy(tammie)\nSublunar(tammie)\nSublunar(jake)\nforall x (Mandatory(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and Fanatical(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nFanatical(millicent) and Unsexy(millicent) -> Outmoded(millicent)\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nSublunar(tammie) and Fanatical(tammie) -> Cacodylic(tammie)\nforall x (Unsexy(x) and Sublunar(x) -> Outmoded(x))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nMandatory(albertina) -> Stained(albertina)\n\nnot Unsexy(albertina)\n\nforall x (Mandatory(x) -> Unsexy(x)) <- forall x (Outmoded(x) -> Mandatory(x)) <- forall x (Unsexy(x) and Sublunar(x) -> Outmoded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Lelah is located. Lelah is mediate. Lelah is wrinkly. Lelah is approved. Richmond is mediate. Richmond is wrinkly. Richmond is approved. Madelle is located. Madelle is mediate. Madelle is saintlike. Madelle is approved. Jody is approved. Cold things are saintlike. If something is wrinkly and undulatory then it is approved. If Lelah is undulatory and Lelah is saintlike then Lelah is located. Green things are approved. If Madelle is approved and Madelle is undulatory then Madelle is wrinkly. All saintlike, approved things are located. Big things are skinned. If Richmond is skinned then Richmond is mediate. Jody is skinned.", "logic": "\nLocated(lelah)\nMediate(lelah)\nWrinkly(lelah)\nApproved(lelah)\nMediate(richmond)\nWrinkly(richmond)\nApproved(richmond)\nLocated(madelle)\nMediate(madelle)\nSaintlike(madelle)\nApproved(madelle)\nApproved(jody)\nforall x (Skinned(x) -> Saintlike(x))\nforall x (Wrinkly(x) and Undulatory(x) -> Approved(x))\nUndulatory(lelah) and Saintlike(lelah) -> Located(lelah)\nforall x (Saintlike(x) -> Approved(x))\nApproved(madelle) and Undulatory(madelle) -> Wrinkly(madelle)\nforall x (Saintlike(x) and Approved(x) -> Located(x))\nforall x (Located(x) -> Skinned(x))\nSkinned(richmond) -> Mediate(richmond)\n\nSkinned(jody)\n\nforall x (Located(x) -> Skinned(x)) <- forall x (Saintlike(x) and Approved(x) -> Located(x)) <- forall x (Skinned(x) -> Saintlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Gil is fizzy. Gil is ruffianly. Gil is hindmost. Gil is sovereign. Hill is ruffianly. Hill is hindmost. Hill is sovereign. Udell is fizzy. Udell is ruffianly. Udell is insatiate. Udell is sovereign. Ezekiel is sovereign. Cold things are insatiate. If something is hindmost and nervous then it is sovereign. If Gil is nervous and Gil is insatiate then Gil is fizzy. Green things are sovereign. If Udell is sovereign and Udell is nervous then Udell is hindmost. All insatiate, sovereign things are fizzy. Big things are horny. If Hill is horny then Hill is ruffianly. Hill is not horny.", "logic": "\nFizzy(gil)\nRuffianly(gil)\nHindmost(gil)\nSovereign(gil)\nRuffianly(hill)\nHindmost(hill)\nSovereign(hill)\nFizzy(udell)\nRuffianly(udell)\nInsatiate(udell)\nSovereign(udell)\nSovereign(ezekiel)\nforall x (Horny(x) -> Insatiate(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) and Nervous(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nNervous(gil) and Insatiate(gil) -> Fizzy(gil)\nforall x (Insatiate(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nSovereign(udell) and Nervous(udell) -> Hindmost(udell)\nforall x (Insatiate(x) and Sovereign(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Horny(x))\nHorny(hill) -> Ruffianly(hill)\n\nnot Horny(hill)\n\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Horny(x)) <- forall x (Insatiate(x) and Sovereign(x) -> Fizzy(x)) <- forall x (Horny(x) -> Insatiate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Ellwood is argive. Ellwood is phocine. Ellwood is deniable. Ellwood is endocrine. Pietro is phocine. Pietro is deniable. Pietro is endocrine. Theada is argive. Theada is phocine. Theada is gleeful. Theada is endocrine. Andres is endocrine. Cold things are gleeful. If something is deniable and dissuasive then it is endocrine. If Ellwood is dissuasive and Ellwood is gleeful then Ellwood is argive. Green things are endocrine. If Theada is endocrine and Theada is dissuasive then Theada is deniable. All gleeful, endocrine things are argive. Big things are agaze. If Pietro is agaze then Pietro is phocine. Ellwood is dissuasive.", "logic": "\nArgive(ellwood)\nPhocine(ellwood)\nDeniable(ellwood)\nEndocrine(ellwood)\nPhocine(pietro)\nDeniable(pietro)\nEndocrine(pietro)\nArgive(theada)\nPhocine(theada)\nGleeful(theada)\nEndocrine(theada)\nEndocrine(andres)\nforall x (Agaze(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) and Dissuasive(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nDissuasive(ellwood) and Gleeful(ellwood) -> Argive(ellwood)\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nEndocrine(theada) and Dissuasive(theada) -> Deniable(theada)\nforall x (Gleeful(x) and Endocrine(x) -> Argive(x))\nforall x (Argive(x) -> Agaze(x))\nAgaze(pietro) -> Phocine(pietro)\n\nDissuasive(ellwood)\n\nDissuasive(ellwood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Saw is isomeric. Saw is ascetical. Saw is tottering. Saw is rupicolous. Joyce is ascetical. Joyce is tottering. Joyce is rupicolous. Tedi is isomeric. Tedi is ascetical. Tedi is ciliary. Tedi is rupicolous. Bonni is rupicolous. Cold things are ciliary. If something is tottering and inchoate then it is rupicolous. If Saw is inchoate and Saw is ciliary then Saw is isomeric. Green things are rupicolous. If Tedi is rupicolous and Tedi is inchoate then Tedi is tottering. All ciliary, rupicolous things are isomeric. Big things are sigmoidal. If Joyce is sigmoidal then Joyce is ascetical. Bonni is not tottering.", "logic": "\nIsomeric(saw)\nAscetical(saw)\nTottering(saw)\nRupicolous(saw)\nAscetical(joyce)\nTottering(joyce)\nRupicolous(joyce)\nIsomeric(tedi)\nAscetical(tedi)\nCiliary(tedi)\nRupicolous(tedi)\nRupicolous(bonni)\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) -> Ciliary(x))\nforall x (Tottering(x) and Inchoate(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\nInchoate(saw) and Ciliary(saw) -> Isomeric(saw)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\nRupicolous(tedi) and Inchoate(tedi) -> Tottering(tedi)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) and Rupicolous(x) -> Isomeric(x))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Sigmoidal(x))\nSigmoidal(joyce) -> Ascetical(joyce)\n\nnot Tottering(bonni)\n\nnot Tottering(bonni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Thibaud is monochrome. Thibaud is phallic. Thibaud is avascular. Thibaud is delinquent. Barn is phallic. Barn is avascular. Barn is delinquent. Yank is monochrome. Yank is phallic. Yank is sunburnt. Yank is delinquent. Jessi is delinquent. Cold things are sunburnt. If something is avascular and jealous then it is delinquent. If Thibaud is jealous and Thibaud is sunburnt then Thibaud is monochrome. Green things are delinquent. If Yank is delinquent and Yank is jealous then Yank is avascular. All sunburnt, delinquent things are monochrome. Big things are contorted. If Barn is contorted then Barn is phallic. Barn is jealous.", "logic": "\nMonochrome(thibaud)\nPhallic(thibaud)\nAvascular(thibaud)\nDelinquent(thibaud)\nPhallic(barn)\nAvascular(barn)\nDelinquent(barn)\nMonochrome(yank)\nPhallic(yank)\nSunburnt(yank)\nDelinquent(yank)\nDelinquent(jessi)\nforall x (Contorted(x) -> Sunburnt(x))\nforall x (Avascular(x) and Jealous(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nJealous(thibaud) and Sunburnt(thibaud) -> Monochrome(thibaud)\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nDelinquent(yank) and Jealous(yank) -> Avascular(yank)\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) and Delinquent(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) -> Contorted(x))\nContorted(barn) -> Phallic(barn)\n\nJealous(barn)\n\nJealous(barn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2267"} {"premises": "Rees is bombastic. Rees is formulaic. Rees is honey. Rees is lxxii. Rees is unexploded. Diana is bombastic. Diana is nocent. Diana is honey. Diana is pissed. Diana is unexploded. Rough, lxxii people are nocent. All bombastic, lxxii people are pissed. Rees is unexploded.", "logic": "\nBombastic(rees)\nFormulaic(rees)\nHoney(rees)\nLxxii(rees)\nUnexploded(rees)\nBombastic(diana)\nNocent(diana)\nHoney(diana)\nPissed(diana)\nUnexploded(diana)\nforall x (Pissed(x) and Lxxii(x) -> Nocent(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and Lxxii(x) -> Pissed(x))\n\nUnexploded(rees)\n\ntherefore Unexploded(rees)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Riccardo is homespun. Riccardo is nether. Riccardo is unfree. Riccardo is noticeable. Riccardo is verbalised. Arther is homespun. Arther is lxvii. Arther is unfree. Arther is titular. Arther is verbalised. Rough, noticeable people are lxvii. All homespun, noticeable people are titular. Arther is not unfree.", "logic": "\nHomespun(riccardo)\nNether(riccardo)\nUnfree(riccardo)\nNoticeable(riccardo)\nVerbalised(riccardo)\nHomespun(arther)\nLxvii(arther)\nUnfree(arther)\nTitular(arther)\nVerbalised(arther)\nforall x (Titular(x) and Noticeable(x) -> Lxvii(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) and Noticeable(x) -> Titular(x))\n\nnot Unfree(arther)\n\ntherefore Unfree(arther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Welch is opened. Welch is catoptric. Welch is recovering. Welch is migratory. Welch is grateful. Marlee is opened. Marlee is concise. Marlee is recovering. Marlee is buffeted. Marlee is grateful. Rough, migratory people are concise. All opened, migratory people are buffeted. Welch is buffeted.", "logic": "\nOpened(welch)\nCatoptric(welch)\nRecovering(welch)\nMigratory(welch)\nGrateful(welch)\nOpened(marlee)\nConcise(marlee)\nRecovering(marlee)\nBuffeted(marlee)\nGrateful(marlee)\nforall x (Buffeted(x) and Migratory(x) -> Concise(x))\nforall x (Opened(x) and Migratory(x) -> Buffeted(x))\n\nBuffeted(welch)\n\nOpened(welch) and Migratory(welch) and forall x (Opened(x) and Migratory(x) -> Buffeted(x)) -> therefore Buffeted(welch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Bryna is convergent. Bryna is goodish. Bryna is pussy. Bryna is geographic. Bryna is tubercular. Dorotea is convergent. Dorotea is leaky. Dorotea is pussy. Dorotea is sized. Dorotea is tubercular. Rough, geographic people are leaky. All convergent, geographic people are sized. Bryna is not sized.", "logic": "\nConvergent(bryna)\nGoodish(bryna)\nPussy(bryna)\nGeographic(bryna)\nTubercular(bryna)\nConvergent(dorotea)\nLeaky(dorotea)\nPussy(dorotea)\nSized(dorotea)\nTubercular(dorotea)\nforall x (Sized(x) and Geographic(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Convergent(x) and Geographic(x) -> Sized(x))\n\nnot Sized(bryna)\n\nConvergent(bryna) and Geographic(bryna) and forall x (Convergent(x) and Geographic(x) -> Sized(x)) -> therefore Sized(bryna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Harmonia is adulterous. Harmonia is graceless. Harmonia is idempotent. Harmonia is vapid. Harmonia is jinxed. Penelope is adulterous. Penelope is unique. Penelope is idempotent. Penelope is sneering. Penelope is jinxed. Rough, vapid people are unique. All adulterous, vapid people are sneering. Harmonia is unique.", "logic": "\nAdulterous(harmonia)\nGraceless(harmonia)\nIdempotent(harmonia)\nVapid(harmonia)\nJinxed(harmonia)\nAdulterous(penelope)\nUnique(penelope)\nIdempotent(penelope)\nSneering(penelope)\nJinxed(penelope)\nforall x (Sneering(x) and Vapid(x) -> Unique(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) and Vapid(x) -> Sneering(x))\n\nUnique(harmonia)\n\nAdulterous(harmonia) and Vapid(harmonia) and forall x (Adulterous(x) and Vapid(x) -> Sneering(x)) -> therefore Sneering(harmonia) Sneering(harmonia) and Vapid(harmonia) and forall x (Sneering(x) and Vapid(x) -> Unique(x)) -> therefore Unique(harmonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Brittan is starved. Brittan is apolitical. Brittan is peerless. Brittan is thwartwise. Brittan is spasmodic. Prentice is starved. Prentice is plastered. Prentice is peerless. Prentice is coalesced. Prentice is spasmodic. Rough, thwartwise people are plastered. All starved, thwartwise people are coalesced. Brittan is not plastered.", "logic": "\nStarved(brittan)\nApolitical(brittan)\nPeerless(brittan)\nThwartwise(brittan)\nSpasmodic(brittan)\nStarved(prentice)\nPlastered(prentice)\nPeerless(prentice)\nCoalesced(prentice)\nSpasmodic(prentice)\nforall x (Coalesced(x) and Thwartwise(x) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) and Thwartwise(x) -> Coalesced(x))\n\nnot Plastered(brittan)\n\nStarved(brittan) and Thwartwise(brittan) and forall x (Starved(x) and Thwartwise(x) -> Coalesced(x)) -> therefore Coalesced(brittan) Coalesced(brittan) and Thwartwise(brittan) and forall x (Coalesced(x) and Thwartwise(x) -> Plastered(x)) -> therefore Plastered(brittan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Stormy is autocratic. Stormy is monodical. Stormy is emulous. Stormy is lucullan. Stormy is corymbose. Wandie is autocratic. Wandie is joyless. Wandie is emulous. Wandie is anaclitic. Wandie is corymbose. Rough, lucullan people are joyless. All autocratic, lucullan people are anaclitic. Wandie is not lucullan.", "logic": "\nAutocratic(stormy)\nMonodical(stormy)\nEmulous(stormy)\nLucullan(stormy)\nCorymbose(stormy)\nAutocratic(wandie)\nJoyless(wandie)\nEmulous(wandie)\nAnaclitic(wandie)\nCorymbose(wandie)\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and Lucullan(x) -> Joyless(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) and Lucullan(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\n\nnot Lucullan(wandie)\n\nnot Lucullan(wandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Lyndel is cyprian. Lyndel is misshapen. Lyndel is laughing. Lyndel is miserly. Lyndel is disgusted. Cherise is cyprian. Cherise is navigable. Cherise is laughing. Cherise is criminal. Cherise is disgusted. Rough, miserly people are navigable. All cyprian, miserly people are criminal. Cherise is misshapen.", "logic": "\nCyprian(lyndel)\nMisshapen(lyndel)\nLaughing(lyndel)\nMiserly(lyndel)\nDisgusted(lyndel)\nCyprian(cherise)\nNavigable(cherise)\nLaughing(cherise)\nCriminal(cherise)\nDisgusted(cherise)\nforall x (Criminal(x) and Miserly(x) -> Navigable(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and Miserly(x) -> Criminal(x))\n\nMisshapen(cherise)\n\nMisshapen(cherise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Teresa is not wiggly. Teresa is conventual. Teresa is squalling. Cold people are squalling. If Teresa is osseous and Teresa is same then Teresa is baronial. If Teresa is baronial then Teresa is wiggly. All same, squalling people are not spikelike. If someone is same and not squalling then they are not spikelike. If Teresa is wiggly and Teresa is conventual then Teresa is not same. If someone is spikelike and not conventual then they are same. All conventual people are same. Teresa is squalling.", "logic": "\nnot Wiggly(teresa)\nConventual(teresa)\nSqualling(teresa)\nforall x (Osseous(x) -> Squalling(x))\nOsseous(teresa) and Same(teresa) -> Baronial(teresa)\nBaronial(teresa) -> Wiggly(teresa)\nforall x (Same(x) and Squalling(x) -> not Spikelike(x))\nforall x (Same(x) and not Squalling(x) -> not Spikelike(x))\nWiggly(teresa) and Conventual(teresa) -> not Same(teresa)\nforall x (Spikelike(x) and not Conventual(x) -> Same(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Same(x))\n\nSqualling(teresa)\n\ntherefore Squalling(teresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Hassan is not mothproof. Hassan is runny. Hassan is colored. Cold people are colored. If Hassan is unverified and Hassan is aimless then Hassan is simian. If Hassan is simian then Hassan is mothproof. All aimless, colored people are not countywide. If someone is aimless and not colored then they are not countywide. If Hassan is mothproof and Hassan is runny then Hassan is not aimless. If someone is countywide and not runny then they are aimless. All runny people are aimless. Hassan is mothproof.", "logic": "\nnot Mothproof(hassan)\nRunny(hassan)\nColored(hassan)\nforall x (Unverified(x) -> Colored(x))\nUnverified(hassan) and Aimless(hassan) -> Simian(hassan)\nSimian(hassan) -> Mothproof(hassan)\nforall x (Aimless(x) and Colored(x) -> not Countywide(x))\nforall x (Aimless(x) and not Colored(x) -> not Countywide(x))\nMothproof(hassan) and Runny(hassan) -> not Aimless(hassan)\nforall x (Countywide(x) and not Runny(x) -> Aimless(x))\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Aimless(x))\n\nMothproof(hassan)\n\ntherefore not Mothproof(hassan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Gwendolyn is not alert. Gwendolyn is epizoic. Gwendolyn is genovese. Cold people are genovese. If Gwendolyn is delinquent and Gwendolyn is mulish then Gwendolyn is outfitted. If Gwendolyn is outfitted then Gwendolyn is alert. All mulish, genovese people are not lordotic. If someone is mulish and not genovese then they are not lordotic. If Gwendolyn is alert and Gwendolyn is epizoic then Gwendolyn is not mulish. If someone is lordotic and not epizoic then they are mulish. All epizoic people are mulish. Gwendolyn is mulish.", "logic": "\nnot Alert(gwendolyn)\nEpizoic(gwendolyn)\nGenovese(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> Genovese(x))\nDelinquent(gwendolyn) and Mulish(gwendolyn) -> Outfitted(gwendolyn)\nOutfitted(gwendolyn) -> Alert(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Mulish(x) and Genovese(x) -> not Lordotic(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) and not Genovese(x) -> not Lordotic(x))\nAlert(gwendolyn) and Epizoic(gwendolyn) -> not Mulish(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Lordotic(x) and not Epizoic(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Mulish(x))\n\nMulish(gwendolyn)\n\nEpizoic(gwendolyn) and forall x (Epizoic(x) -> Mulish(x)) -> therefore Mulish(gwendolyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Moreen is not maleficent. Moreen is obliged. Moreen is daring. Cold people are daring. If Moreen is trilobate and Moreen is pyrogallic then Moreen is insanitary. If Moreen is insanitary then Moreen is maleficent. All pyrogallic, daring people are not prejudiced. If someone is pyrogallic and not daring then they are not prejudiced. If Moreen is maleficent and Moreen is obliged then Moreen is not pyrogallic. If someone is prejudiced and not obliged then they are pyrogallic. All obliged people are pyrogallic. Moreen is not pyrogallic.", "logic": "\nnot Maleficent(moreen)\nObliged(moreen)\nDaring(moreen)\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Daring(x))\nTrilobate(moreen) and Pyrogallic(moreen) -> Insanitary(moreen)\nInsanitary(moreen) -> Maleficent(moreen)\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) and Daring(x) -> not Prejudiced(x))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) and not Daring(x) -> not Prejudiced(x))\nMaleficent(moreen) and Obliged(moreen) -> not Pyrogallic(moreen)\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) and not Obliged(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\n\nnot Pyrogallic(moreen)\n\nObliged(moreen) and forall x (Obliged(x) -> Pyrogallic(x)) -> therefore Pyrogallic(moreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Theo is not septal. Theo is untended. Theo is global. Cold people are global. If Theo is estonian and Theo is polite then Theo is mature. If Theo is mature then Theo is septal. All polite, global people are not micropylar. If someone is polite and not global then they are not micropylar. If Theo is septal and Theo is untended then Theo is not polite. If someone is micropylar and not untended then they are polite. All untended people are polite. Theo is not micropylar.", "logic": "\nnot Septal(theo)\nUntended(theo)\nGlobal(theo)\nforall x (Estonian(x) -> Global(x))\nEstonian(theo) and Polite(theo) -> Mature(theo)\nMature(theo) -> Septal(theo)\nforall x (Polite(x) and Global(x) -> not Micropylar(x))\nforall x (Polite(x) and not Global(x) -> not Micropylar(x))\nSeptal(theo) and Untended(theo) -> not Polite(theo)\nforall x (Micropylar(x) and not Untended(x) -> Polite(x))\nforall x (Untended(x) -> Polite(x))\n\nnot Micropylar(theo)\n\nUntended(theo) and forall x (Untended(x) -> Polite(x)) -> therefore Polite(theo) Polite(theo) and Global(theo) and forall x (Polite(x) and Global(x) -> not Micropylar(x)) -> therefore not Micropylar(theo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Eada is not epizootic. Eada is scheming. Eada is autogamic. Cold people are autogamic. If Eada is copesetic and Eada is unarguable then Eada is arabic. If Eada is arabic then Eada is epizootic. All unarguable, autogamic people are not uneventful. If someone is unarguable and not autogamic then they are not uneventful. If Eada is epizootic and Eada is scheming then Eada is not unarguable. If someone is uneventful and not scheming then they are unarguable. All scheming people are unarguable. Eada is uneventful.", "logic": "\nnot Epizootic(eada)\nScheming(eada)\nAutogamic(eada)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Autogamic(x))\nCopesetic(eada) and Unarguable(eada) -> Arabic(eada)\nArabic(eada) -> Epizootic(eada)\nforall x (Unarguable(x) and Autogamic(x) -> not Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Unarguable(x) and not Autogamic(x) -> not Uneventful(x))\nEpizootic(eada) and Scheming(eada) -> not Unarguable(eada)\nforall x (Uneventful(x) and not Scheming(x) -> Unarguable(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) -> Unarguable(x))\n\nUneventful(eada)\n\nScheming(eada) and forall x (Scheming(x) -> Unarguable(x)) -> therefore Unarguable(eada) Unarguable(eada) and Autogamic(eada) and forall x (Unarguable(x) and Autogamic(x) -> not Uneventful(x)) -> therefore not Uneventful(eada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Mariann is not indirect. Mariann is joyful. Mariann is fuscous. Cold people are fuscous. If Mariann is unlovable and Mariann is carpeted then Mariann is wholemeal. If Mariann is wholemeal then Mariann is indirect. All carpeted, fuscous people are not shitty. If someone is carpeted and not fuscous then they are not shitty. If Mariann is indirect and Mariann is joyful then Mariann is not carpeted. If someone is shitty and not joyful then they are carpeted. All joyful people are carpeted. Mariann is not wholemeal.", "logic": "\nnot Indirect(mariann)\nJoyful(mariann)\nFuscous(mariann)\nforall x (Unlovable(x) -> Fuscous(x))\nUnlovable(mariann) and Carpeted(mariann) -> Wholemeal(mariann)\nWholemeal(mariann) -> Indirect(mariann)\nforall x (Carpeted(x) and Fuscous(x) -> not Shitty(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) and not Fuscous(x) -> not Shitty(x))\nIndirect(mariann) and Joyful(mariann) -> not Carpeted(mariann)\nforall x (Shitty(x) and not Joyful(x) -> Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Carpeted(x))\n\nnot Wholemeal(mariann)\n\nUnlovable(mariann) and Carpeted(mariann) -> Wholemeal(mariann) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Bryce is not jinxed. Bryce is outmost. Bryce is windswept. Cold people are windswept. If Bryce is dimorphous and Bryce is vietnamese then Bryce is right. If Bryce is right then Bryce is jinxed. All vietnamese, windswept people are not yawning. If someone is vietnamese and not windswept then they are not yawning. If Bryce is jinxed and Bryce is outmost then Bryce is not vietnamese. If someone is yawning and not outmost then they are vietnamese. All outmost people are vietnamese. Bryce is dimorphous.", "logic": "\nnot Jinxed(bryce)\nOutmost(bryce)\nWindswept(bryce)\nforall x (Dimorphous(x) -> Windswept(x))\nDimorphous(bryce) and Vietnamese(bryce) -> Right(bryce)\nRight(bryce) -> Jinxed(bryce)\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) and Windswept(x) -> not Yawning(x))\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) and not Windswept(x) -> not Yawning(x))\nJinxed(bryce) and Outmost(bryce) -> not Vietnamese(bryce)\nforall x (Yawning(x) and not Outmost(x) -> Vietnamese(x))\nforall x (Outmost(x) -> Vietnamese(x))\n\nDimorphous(bryce)\n\nDimorphous(bryce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1933"} {"premises": "Eleanor is not monogenic. Eleanor is not leonine. Eleanor is strict. Eleanor is not uppity. Eleanor is senile. Eleanor is overmuch. Eleanor is suppressed. Che is monogenic. Che is leonine. Che is strict. Che is uppity. Che is overmuch. Che is suppressed. Tamra is not strict. Tamra is senile. If someone is senile and uppity then they are monogenic. All suppressed people are overmuch. If someone is monogenic and suppressed then they are senile. Quiet people are senile. If someone is strict then they are suppressed. If someone is senile then they are suppressed. All suppressed, monogenic people are strict. If someone is suppressed and not monogenic then they are not leonine. Che is suppressed.", "logic": "\nnot Monogenic(eleanor)\nnot Leonine(eleanor)\nStrict(eleanor)\nnot Uppity(eleanor)\nSenile(eleanor)\nOvermuch(eleanor)\nSuppressed(eleanor)\nMonogenic(che)\nLeonine(che)\nStrict(che)\nUppity(che)\nOvermuch(che)\nSuppressed(che)\nnot Strict(tamra)\nSenile(tamra)\nforall x (Senile(x) and Uppity(x) -> Monogenic(x))\nforall x (Suppressed(x) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Monogenic(x) and Suppressed(x) -> Senile(x))\nforall x (Uppity(x) -> Senile(x))\nforall x (Strict(x) -> Suppressed(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Suppressed(x))\nforall x (Suppressed(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Strict(x))\nforall x (Suppressed(x) and not Monogenic(x) -> not Leonine(x))\n\nSuppressed(che)\n\ntherefore Suppressed(che)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "Dita is not plane. Dita is not unveiled. Dita is jawless. Dita is not jilted. Dita is mangled. Dita is cinerary. Dita is accustomed. Michelle is plane. Michelle is unveiled. Michelle is jawless. Michelle is jilted. Michelle is cinerary. Michelle is accustomed. Ainsley is not jawless. Ainsley is mangled. If someone is mangled and jilted then they are plane. All accustomed people are cinerary. If someone is plane and accustomed then they are mangled. Quiet people are mangled. If someone is jawless then they are accustomed. If someone is mangled then they are accustomed. All accustomed, plane people are jawless. If someone is accustomed and not plane then they are not unveiled. Dita is unveiled.", "logic": "\nnot Plane(dita)\nnot Unveiled(dita)\nJawless(dita)\nnot Jilted(dita)\nMangled(dita)\nCinerary(dita)\nAccustomed(dita)\nPlane(michelle)\nUnveiled(michelle)\nJawless(michelle)\nJilted(michelle)\nCinerary(michelle)\nAccustomed(michelle)\nnot Jawless(ainsley)\nMangled(ainsley)\nforall x (Mangled(x) and Jilted(x) -> Plane(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) and Accustomed(x) -> Mangled(x))\nforall x (Jilted(x) -> Mangled(x))\nforall x (Jawless(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Mangled(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) and Plane(x) -> Jawless(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) and not Plane(x) -> not Unveiled(x))\n\nUnveiled(dita)\n\ntherefore not Unveiled(dita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "Dickie is not ennobling. Dickie is not epimorphic. Dickie is undogmatic. Dickie is not stripped. Dickie is voteless. Dickie is developing. Dickie is hatless. Julia is ennobling. Julia is epimorphic. Julia is undogmatic. Julia is stripped. Julia is developing. Julia is hatless. Codie is not undogmatic. Codie is voteless. If someone is voteless and stripped then they are ennobling. All hatless people are developing. If someone is ennobling and hatless then they are voteless. Quiet people are voteless. If someone is undogmatic then they are hatless. If someone is voteless then they are hatless. All hatless, ennobling people are undogmatic. If someone is hatless and not ennobling then they are not epimorphic. Codie is hatless.", "logic": "\nnot Ennobling(dickie)\nnot Epimorphic(dickie)\nUndogmatic(dickie)\nnot Stripped(dickie)\nVoteless(dickie)\nDeveloping(dickie)\nHatless(dickie)\nEnnobling(julia)\nEpimorphic(julia)\nUndogmatic(julia)\nStripped(julia)\nDeveloping(julia)\nHatless(julia)\nnot Undogmatic(codie)\nVoteless(codie)\nforall x (Voteless(x) and Stripped(x) -> Ennobling(x))\nforall x (Hatless(x) -> Developing(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) and Hatless(x) -> Voteless(x))\nforall x (Stripped(x) -> Voteless(x))\nforall x (Undogmatic(x) -> Hatless(x))\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Hatless(x))\nforall x (Hatless(x) and Ennobling(x) -> Undogmatic(x))\nforall x (Hatless(x) and not Ennobling(x) -> not Epimorphic(x))\n\nHatless(codie)\n\nVoteless(codie) and forall x (Voteless(x) -> Hatless(x)) -> therefore Hatless(codie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "Raine is not crapulent. Raine is not acoustical. Raine is confining. Raine is not costly. Raine is taking. Raine is condign. Raine is sitting. Antonia is crapulent. Antonia is acoustical. Antonia is confining. Antonia is costly. Antonia is condign. Antonia is sitting. Mitra is not confining. Mitra is taking. If someone is taking and costly then they are crapulent. All sitting people are condign. If someone is crapulent and sitting then they are taking. Quiet people are taking. If someone is confining then they are sitting. If someone is taking then they are sitting. All sitting, crapulent people are confining. If someone is sitting and not crapulent then they are not acoustical. Antonia is not taking.", "logic": "\nnot Crapulent(raine)\nnot Acoustical(raine)\nConfining(raine)\nnot Costly(raine)\nTaking(raine)\nCondign(raine)\nSitting(raine)\nCrapulent(antonia)\nAcoustical(antonia)\nConfining(antonia)\nCostly(antonia)\nCondign(antonia)\nSitting(antonia)\nnot Confining(mitra)\nTaking(mitra)\nforall x (Taking(x) and Costly(x) -> Crapulent(x))\nforall x (Sitting(x) -> Condign(x))\nforall x (Crapulent(x) and Sitting(x) -> Taking(x))\nforall x (Costly(x) -> Taking(x))\nforall x (Confining(x) -> Sitting(x))\nforall x (Taking(x) -> Sitting(x))\nforall x (Sitting(x) and Crapulent(x) -> Confining(x))\nforall x (Sitting(x) and not Crapulent(x) -> not Acoustical(x))\n\nnot Taking(antonia)\n\nCostly(antonia) and forall x (Costly(x) -> Taking(x)) -> therefore Taking(antonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "Angelique is not sectarian. Angelique is not grecian. Angelique is unchanged. Angelique is not homosexual. Angelique is foggy. Angelique is morose. Angelique is unbodied. Wayne is sectarian. Wayne is grecian. Wayne is unchanged. Wayne is homosexual. Wayne is morose. Wayne is unbodied. Stu is not unchanged. Stu is foggy. If someone is foggy and homosexual then they are sectarian. All unbodied people are morose. If someone is sectarian and unbodied then they are foggy. Quiet people are foggy. If someone is unchanged then they are unbodied. If someone is foggy then they are unbodied. All unbodied, sectarian people are unchanged. If someone is unbodied and not sectarian then they are not grecian. Stu is morose.", "logic": "\nnot Sectarian(angelique)\nnot Grecian(angelique)\nUnchanged(angelique)\nnot Homosexual(angelique)\nFoggy(angelique)\nMorose(angelique)\nUnbodied(angelique)\nSectarian(wayne)\nGrecian(wayne)\nUnchanged(wayne)\nHomosexual(wayne)\nMorose(wayne)\nUnbodied(wayne)\nnot Unchanged(stu)\nFoggy(stu)\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Homosexual(x) -> Sectarian(x))\nforall x (Unbodied(x) -> Morose(x))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) and Unbodied(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Unbodied(x) and Sectarian(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Unbodied(x) and not Sectarian(x) -> not Grecian(x))\n\nMorose(stu)\n\nFoggy(stu) and forall x (Foggy(x) -> Unbodied(x)) -> therefore Unbodied(stu) Unbodied(stu) and forall x (Unbodied(x) -> Morose(x)) -> therefore Morose(stu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "Goddard is not timbered. Goddard is not sneaking. Goddard is pantheist. Goddard is not nonslip. Goddard is lxxiii. Goddard is galling. Goddard is older. Caprice is timbered. Caprice is sneaking. Caprice is pantheist. Caprice is nonslip. Caprice is galling. Caprice is older. Candra is not pantheist. Candra is lxxiii. If someone is lxxiii and nonslip then they are timbered. All older people are galling. If someone is timbered and older then they are lxxiii. Quiet people are lxxiii. If someone is pantheist then they are older. If someone is lxxiii then they are older. All older, timbered people are pantheist. If someone is older and not timbered then they are not sneaking. Candra is not galling.", "logic": "\nnot Timbered(goddard)\nnot Sneaking(goddard)\nPantheist(goddard)\nnot Nonslip(goddard)\nLxxiii(goddard)\nGalling(goddard)\nOlder(goddard)\nTimbered(caprice)\nSneaking(caprice)\nPantheist(caprice)\nNonslip(caprice)\nGalling(caprice)\nOlder(caprice)\nnot Pantheist(candra)\nLxxiii(candra)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and Nonslip(x) -> Timbered(x))\nforall x (Older(x) -> Galling(x))\nforall x (Timbered(x) and Older(x) -> Lxxiii(x))\nforall x (Nonslip(x) -> Lxxiii(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) -> Older(x))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Older(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and Timbered(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and not Timbered(x) -> not Sneaking(x))\n\nnot Galling(candra)\n\nLxxiii(candra) and forall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Older(x)) -> therefore Older(candra) Older(candra) and forall x (Older(x) -> Galling(x)) -> therefore Galling(candra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "Merril is not catacorner. Merril is not unsilenced. Merril is abdominal. Merril is not lubricated. Merril is debased. Merril is brainsick. Merril is spineless. Norina is catacorner. Norina is unsilenced. Norina is abdominal. Norina is lubricated. Norina is brainsick. Norina is spineless. Lelah is not abdominal. Lelah is debased. If someone is debased and lubricated then they are catacorner. All spineless people are brainsick. If someone is catacorner and spineless then they are debased. Quiet people are debased. If someone is abdominal then they are spineless. If someone is debased then they are spineless. All spineless, catacorner people are abdominal. If someone is spineless and not catacorner then they are not unsilenced. Lelah is not catacorner.", "logic": "\nnot Catacorner(merril)\nnot Unsilenced(merril)\nAbdominal(merril)\nnot Lubricated(merril)\nDebased(merril)\nBrainsick(merril)\nSpineless(merril)\nCatacorner(norina)\nUnsilenced(norina)\nAbdominal(norina)\nLubricated(norina)\nBrainsick(norina)\nSpineless(norina)\nnot Abdominal(lelah)\nDebased(lelah)\nforall x (Debased(x) and Lubricated(x) -> Catacorner(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) -> Brainsick(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) and Spineless(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Lubricated(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Abdominal(x) -> Spineless(x))\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Spineless(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) and Catacorner(x) -> Abdominal(x))\nforall x (Spineless(x) and not Catacorner(x) -> not Unsilenced(x))\n\nnot Catacorner(lelah)\n\nforall x (Debased(x) and Lubricated(x) -> Catacorner(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "Danika is not anserine. Danika is not saliferous. Danika is mediatory. Danika is not foreboding. Danika is colloidal. Danika is unshared. Danika is engrossing. Carolie is anserine. Carolie is saliferous. Carolie is mediatory. Carolie is foreboding. Carolie is unshared. Carolie is engrossing. Calypso is not mediatory. Calypso is colloidal. If someone is colloidal and foreboding then they are anserine. All engrossing people are unshared. If someone is anserine and engrossing then they are colloidal. Quiet people are colloidal. If someone is mediatory then they are engrossing. If someone is colloidal then they are engrossing. All engrossing, anserine people are mediatory. If someone is engrossing and not anserine then they are not saliferous. Calypso is saliferous.", "logic": "\nnot Anserine(danika)\nnot Saliferous(danika)\nMediatory(danika)\nnot Foreboding(danika)\nColloidal(danika)\nUnshared(danika)\nEngrossing(danika)\nAnserine(carolie)\nSaliferous(carolie)\nMediatory(carolie)\nForeboding(carolie)\nUnshared(carolie)\nEngrossing(carolie)\nnot Mediatory(calypso)\nColloidal(calypso)\nforall x (Colloidal(x) and Foreboding(x) -> Anserine(x))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> Unshared(x))\nforall x (Anserine(x) and Engrossing(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Engrossing(x))\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Engrossing(x))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) and Anserine(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) and not Anserine(x) -> not Saliferous(x))\n\nSaliferous(calypso)\n\nSaliferous(calypso) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1777"} {"premises": "The flipper is cured. The flipper is auxetic. The flipper dissolve the gabe. The flipper intumesce the gabe. The salomone is nectarous. The salomone is hebdomadal. The salomone dissolve the flipper. The salomone intumesce the flipper. The gabe intumesce the quinton. The gabe isomerize the flipper. The gabe isomerize the salomone. The quinton is nectarous. The quinton dissolve the flipper. The quinton dissolve the gabe. The quinton intumesce the salomone. If something intumesce the flipper then the flipper is convincing. If something is convincing and it dissolve the gabe then the gabe dissolve the quinton. The quinton intumesce the salomone.", "logic": "\nCured(flipper)\nAuxetic(flipper)\nDissolve(flipper, gabe)\nIntumesce(flipper, gabe)\nNectarous(salomone)\nHebdomadal(salomone)\nDissolve(salomone, flipper)\nIntumesce(salomone, flipper)\nIntumesce(gabe, quinton)\nIsomerize(gabe, flipper)\nIsomerize(gabe, salomone)\nNectarous(quinton)\nDissolve(quinton, flipper)\nDissolve(quinton, gabe)\nIntumesce(quinton, salomone)\nforall x (Intumesce(x, flipper) -> Convincing(flipper))\nforall x (Convincing(x) and Dissolve(x, gabe) -> Dissolve(gabe, quinton))\n\nIntumesce(quinton, salomone)\n\ntherefore Intumesce(quinton, salomone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The spence is soprano. The spence is setaceous. The spence slate the nelia. The spence carpenter the nelia. The korney is oxidised. The korney is monogynous. The korney slate the spence. The korney carpenter the spence. The nelia carpenter the isidore. The nelia circuit the spence. The nelia circuit the korney. The isidore is oxidised. The isidore slate the spence. The isidore slate the nelia. The isidore carpenter the korney. If something carpenter the spence then the spence is ideational. If something is ideational and it slate the nelia then the nelia slate the isidore. The spence does not need the nelia.", "logic": "\nSoprano(spence)\nSetaceous(spence)\nSlate(spence, nelia)\nCarpenter(spence, nelia)\nOxidised(korney)\nMonogynous(korney)\nSlate(korney, spence)\nCarpenter(korney, spence)\nCarpenter(nelia, isidore)\nCircuit(nelia, spence)\nCircuit(nelia, korney)\nOxidised(isidore)\nSlate(isidore, spence)\nSlate(isidore, nelia)\nCarpenter(isidore, korney)\nforall x (Carpenter(x, spence) -> Ideational(spence))\nforall x (Ideational(x) and Slate(x, nelia) -> Slate(nelia, isidore))\n\nnot Carpenter(spence, nelia)\n\ntherefore Carpenter(spence, nelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The sonja is chubby. The sonja is embonpoint. The sonja murk the tamra. The sonja dilute the tamra. The vonny is lyrate. The vonny is weightless. The vonny murk the sonja. The vonny dilute the sonja. The tamra dilute the renee. The tamra uproot the sonja. The tamra uproot the vonny. The renee is lyrate. The renee murk the sonja. The renee murk the tamra. The renee dilute the vonny. If something dilute the sonja then the sonja is lordless. If something is lordless and it murk the tamra then the tamra murk the renee. The sonja is lordless.", "logic": "\nChubby(sonja)\nEmbonpoint(sonja)\nMurk(sonja, tamra)\nDilute(sonja, tamra)\nLyrate(vonny)\nWeightless(vonny)\nMurk(vonny, sonja)\nDilute(vonny, sonja)\nDilute(tamra, renee)\nUproot(tamra, sonja)\nUproot(tamra, vonny)\nLyrate(renee)\nMurk(renee, sonja)\nMurk(renee, tamra)\nDilute(renee, vonny)\nforall x (Dilute(x, sonja) -> Lordless(sonja))\nforall x (Lordless(x) and Murk(x, tamra) -> Murk(tamra, renee))\n\nLordless(sonja)\n\nDilute(vonny, sonja) and forall x (Dilute(x, sonja) -> Lordless(sonja)) -> therefore Lordless(sonja)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The ambros is hind. The ambros is topologic. The ambros scrag the edee. The ambros track the edee. The gustavus is wounding. The gustavus is competent. The gustavus scrag the ambros. The gustavus track the ambros. The edee track the bernd. The edee gentle the ambros. The edee gentle the gustavus. The bernd is wounding. The bernd scrag the ambros. The bernd scrag the edee. The bernd track the gustavus. If something track the ambros then the ambros is defoliated. If something is defoliated and it scrag the edee then the edee scrag the bernd. The ambros is not defoliated.", "logic": "\nHind(ambros)\nTopologic(ambros)\nScrag(ambros, edee)\nTrack(ambros, edee)\nWounding(gustavus)\nCompetent(gustavus)\nScrag(gustavus, ambros)\nTrack(gustavus, ambros)\nTrack(edee, bernd)\nGentle(edee, ambros)\nGentle(edee, gustavus)\nWounding(bernd)\nScrag(bernd, ambros)\nScrag(bernd, edee)\nTrack(bernd, gustavus)\nforall x (Track(x, ambros) -> Defoliated(ambros))\nforall x (Defoliated(x) and Scrag(x, edee) -> Scrag(edee, bernd))\n\nnot Defoliated(ambros)\n\nTrack(gustavus, ambros) and forall x (Track(x, ambros) -> Defoliated(ambros)) -> therefore Defoliated(ambros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The stephi is rhetorical. The stephi is noetic. The stephi abreact the myles. The stephi utilise the myles. The carlie is signal. The carlie is lean. The carlie abreact the stephi. The carlie utilise the stephi. The myles utilise the shanie. The myles clown the stephi. The myles clown the carlie. The shanie is signal. The shanie abreact the stephi. The shanie abreact the myles. The shanie utilise the carlie. If something utilise the stephi then the stephi is syncretic. If something is syncretic and it abreact the myles then the myles abreact the shanie. The myles abreact the shanie.", "logic": "\nRhetorical(stephi)\nNoetic(stephi)\nAbreact(stephi, myles)\nUtilise(stephi, myles)\nSignal(carlie)\nLean(carlie)\nAbreact(carlie, stephi)\nUtilise(carlie, stephi)\nUtilise(myles, shanie)\nClown(myles, stephi)\nClown(myles, carlie)\nSignal(shanie)\nAbreact(shanie, stephi)\nAbreact(shanie, myles)\nUtilise(shanie, carlie)\nforall x (Utilise(x, stephi) -> Syncretic(stephi))\nforall x (Syncretic(x) and Abreact(x, myles) -> Abreact(myles, shanie))\n\nAbreact(myles, shanie)\n\nUtilise(carlie, stephi) and forall x (Utilise(x, stephi) -> Syncretic(stephi)) -> therefore Syncretic(stephi) Syncretic(stephi) and Abreact(stephi, myles) and forall x (Syncretic(x) and Abreact(x, myles) -> Abreact(myles, shanie)) -> therefore Abreact(myles, shanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The idalina is oozy. The idalina is nappy. The idalina erupt the noni. The idalina enlace the noni. The suki is paperlike. The suki is tragicomic. The suki erupt the idalina. The suki enlace the idalina. The noni enlace the delila. The noni cannulize the idalina. The noni cannulize the suki. The delila is paperlike. The delila erupt the idalina. The delila erupt the noni. The delila enlace the suki. If something enlace the idalina then the idalina is posed. If something is posed and it erupt the noni then the noni erupt the delila. The noni does not like the delila.", "logic": "\nOozy(idalina)\nNappy(idalina)\nErupt(idalina, noni)\nEnlace(idalina, noni)\nPaperlike(suki)\nTragicomic(suki)\nErupt(suki, idalina)\nEnlace(suki, idalina)\nEnlace(noni, delila)\nCannulize(noni, idalina)\nCannulize(noni, suki)\nPaperlike(delila)\nErupt(delila, idalina)\nErupt(delila, noni)\nEnlace(delila, suki)\nforall x (Enlace(x, idalina) -> Posed(idalina))\nforall x (Posed(x) and Erupt(x, noni) -> Erupt(noni, delila))\n\nnot Erupt(noni, delila)\n\nEnlace(suki, idalina) and forall x (Enlace(x, idalina) -> Posed(idalina)) -> therefore Posed(idalina) Posed(idalina) and Erupt(idalina, noni) and forall x (Posed(x) and Erupt(x, noni) -> Erupt(noni, delila)) -> therefore Erupt(noni, delila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The oralla is melodic. The oralla is deweyan. The oralla signalize the aurlie. The oralla brutalise the aurlie. The arden is praetorian. The arden is partitive. The arden signalize the oralla. The arden brutalise the oralla. The aurlie brutalise the viola. The aurlie kibosh the oralla. The aurlie kibosh the arden. The viola is praetorian. The viola signalize the oralla. The viola signalize the aurlie. The viola brutalise the arden. If something brutalise the oralla then the oralla is cultural. If something is cultural and it signalize the aurlie then the aurlie signalize the viola. The viola does not visit the aurlie.", "logic": "\nMelodic(oralla)\nDeweyan(oralla)\nSignalize(oralla, aurlie)\nBrutalise(oralla, aurlie)\nPraetorian(arden)\nPartitive(arden)\nSignalize(arden, oralla)\nBrutalise(arden, oralla)\nBrutalise(aurlie, viola)\nKibosh(aurlie, oralla)\nKibosh(aurlie, arden)\nPraetorian(viola)\nSignalize(viola, oralla)\nSignalize(viola, aurlie)\nBrutalise(viola, arden)\nforall x (Brutalise(x, oralla) -> Cultural(oralla))\nforall x (Cultural(x) and Signalize(x, aurlie) -> Signalize(aurlie, viola))\n\nnot Kibosh(viola, aurlie)\n\nnot Kibosh(viola, aurlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The shamus is gluteal. The shamus is detected. The shamus trivialize the ulises. The shamus subtitle the ulises. The conchita is fumed. The conchita is allomerous. The conchita trivialize the shamus. The conchita subtitle the shamus. The ulises subtitle the katti. The ulises buckram the shamus. The ulises buckram the conchita. The katti is fumed. The katti trivialize the shamus. The katti trivialize the ulises. The katti subtitle the conchita. If something subtitle the shamus then the shamus is superfine. If something is superfine and it trivialize the ulises then the ulises trivialize the katti. The conchita trivialize the conchita.", "logic": "\nGluteal(shamus)\nDetected(shamus)\nTrivialize(shamus, ulises)\nSubtitle(shamus, ulises)\nFumed(conchita)\nAllomerous(conchita)\nTrivialize(conchita, shamus)\nSubtitle(conchita, shamus)\nSubtitle(ulises, katti)\nBuckram(ulises, shamus)\nBuckram(ulises, conchita)\nFumed(katti)\nTrivialize(katti, shamus)\nTrivialize(katti, ulises)\nSubtitle(katti, conchita)\nforall x (Subtitle(x, shamus) -> Superfine(shamus))\nforall x (Superfine(x) and Trivialize(x, ulises) -> Trivialize(ulises, katti))\n\nTrivialize(conchita, conchita)\n\nTrivialize(conchita, conchita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The mirella is fair. The mirella is overaged. The mirella plague the hanson. The mirella pine the hanson. The tarzan is nontoxic. The tarzan is revertible. The tarzan plague the mirella. The tarzan pine the mirella. The hanson pine the herb. The hanson pair the mirella. The hanson pair the tarzan. The herb is nontoxic. The herb plague the mirella. The herb plague the hanson. The herb pine the tarzan. If something pine the mirella then the mirella is downy. If something is downy and it plague the hanson then the hanson plague the herb. The hanson is not downy.", "logic": "\nFair(mirella)\nOveraged(mirella)\nPlague(mirella, hanson)\nPine(mirella, hanson)\nNontoxic(tarzan)\nRevertible(tarzan)\nPlague(tarzan, mirella)\nPine(tarzan, mirella)\nPine(hanson, herb)\nPair(hanson, mirella)\nPair(hanson, tarzan)\nNontoxic(herb)\nPlague(herb, mirella)\nPlague(herb, hanson)\nPine(herb, tarzan)\nforall x (Pine(x, mirella) -> Downy(mirella))\nforall x (Downy(x) and Plague(x, hanson) -> Plague(hanson, herb))\n\nnot Downy(hanson)\n\nnot Downy(hanson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The scot is adept. The scot is looted. The scot enplane the penni. The scot dissemble the penni. The barbee is gentle. The barbee is congealed. The barbee enplane the scot. The barbee dissemble the scot. The penni dissemble the cherey. The penni foreshow the scot. The penni foreshow the barbee. The cherey is gentle. The cherey enplane the scot. The cherey enplane the penni. The cherey dissemble the barbee. If something dissemble the scot then the scot is northmost. If something is northmost and it enplane the penni then the penni enplane the cherey. The cherey enplane the cherey.", "logic": "\nAdept(scot)\nLooted(scot)\nEnplane(scot, penni)\nDissemble(scot, penni)\nGentle(barbee)\nCongealed(barbee)\nEnplane(barbee, scot)\nDissemble(barbee, scot)\nDissemble(penni, cherey)\nForeshow(penni, scot)\nForeshow(penni, barbee)\nGentle(cherey)\nEnplane(cherey, scot)\nEnplane(cherey, penni)\nDissemble(cherey, barbee)\nforall x (Dissemble(x, scot) -> Northmost(scot))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and Enplane(x, penni) -> Enplane(penni, cherey))\n\nEnplane(cherey, cherey)\n\nEnplane(cherey, cherey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The jervis is arachnoid. The jervis is spiffing. The jervis plummet the thelma. The jervis smart the thelma. The becca is sage. The becca is alimental. The becca plummet the jervis. The becca smart the jervis. The thelma smart the theada. The thelma impregnate the jervis. The thelma impregnate the becca. The theada is sage. The theada plummet the jervis. The theada plummet the thelma. The theada smart the becca. If something smart the jervis then the jervis is lean. If something is lean and it plummet the thelma then the thelma plummet the theada. The becca is not lean.", "logic": "\nArachnoid(jervis)\nSpiffing(jervis)\nPlummet(jervis, thelma)\nSmart(jervis, thelma)\nSage(becca)\nAlimental(becca)\nPlummet(becca, jervis)\nSmart(becca, jervis)\nSmart(thelma, theada)\nImpregnate(thelma, jervis)\nImpregnate(thelma, becca)\nSage(theada)\nPlummet(theada, jervis)\nPlummet(theada, thelma)\nSmart(theada, becca)\nforall x (Smart(x, jervis) -> Lean(jervis))\nforall x (Lean(x) and Plummet(x, thelma) -> Plummet(thelma, theada))\n\nnot Lean(becca)\n\nnot Lean(becca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The sayres is grovelling. The sayres is double. The sayres buttress the sile. The sayres tremble the sile. The wain is plumy. The wain is ecological. The wain buttress the sayres. The wain tremble the sayres. The sile tremble the tedda. The sile naturalize the sayres. The sile naturalize the wain. The tedda is plumy. The tedda buttress the sayres. The tedda buttress the sile. The tedda tremble the wain. If something tremble the sayres then the sayres is attested. If something is attested and it buttress the sile then the sile buttress the tedda. The sile buttress the wain.", "logic": "\nGrovelling(sayres)\nDouble(sayres)\nButtress(sayres, sile)\nTremble(sayres, sile)\nPlumy(wain)\nEcological(wain)\nButtress(wain, sayres)\nTremble(wain, sayres)\nTremble(sile, tedda)\nNaturalize(sile, sayres)\nNaturalize(sile, wain)\nPlumy(tedda)\nButtress(tedda, sayres)\nButtress(tedda, sile)\nTremble(tedda, wain)\nforall x (Tremble(x, sayres) -> Attested(sayres))\nforall x (Attested(x) and Buttress(x, sile) -> Buttress(sile, tedda))\n\nButtress(sile, wain)\n\nButtress(sile, wain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1867"} {"premises": "The michele is valiant. The michele furlough the coretta. The michele lean the gayle. The gayle is ecumenic. The gayle twitch the silvano. The gayle furlough the michele. The silvano twitch the gayle. The silvano furlough the michele. The coretta is ecumenic. The coretta twitch the gayle. The coretta furlough the silvano. The coretta lean the gayle. If something is ecumenic then it lean the coretta. If something furlough the michele and the michele is valiant then the michele is ecumenic. The gayle twitch the silvano.", "logic": "\nValiant(michele)\nFurlough(michele, coretta)\nLean(michele, gayle)\nEcumenic(gayle)\nTwitch(gayle, silvano)\nFurlough(gayle, michele)\nTwitch(silvano, gayle)\nFurlough(silvano, michele)\nEcumenic(coretta)\nTwitch(coretta, gayle)\nFurlough(coretta, silvano)\nLean(coretta, gayle)\nforall x (Ecumenic(x) -> Lean(x, coretta))\nforall x (Furlough(x, michele) and Valiant(michele) -> Ecumenic(michele))\n\nTwitch(gayle, silvano)\n\ntherefore Twitch(gayle, silvano)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The eveleen is unpunctual. The eveleen obfuscate the siobhan. The eveleen perish the rosmunda. The rosmunda is scrabbly. The rosmunda salivate the ragnhild. The rosmunda obfuscate the eveleen. The ragnhild salivate the rosmunda. The ragnhild obfuscate the eveleen. The siobhan is scrabbly. The siobhan salivate the rosmunda. The siobhan obfuscate the ragnhild. The siobhan perish the rosmunda. If something is scrabbly then it perish the siobhan. If something obfuscate the eveleen and the eveleen is unpunctual then the eveleen is scrabbly. The rosmunda does not like the ragnhild.", "logic": "\nUnpunctual(eveleen)\nObfuscate(eveleen, siobhan)\nPerish(eveleen, rosmunda)\nScrabbly(rosmunda)\nSalivate(rosmunda, ragnhild)\nObfuscate(rosmunda, eveleen)\nSalivate(ragnhild, rosmunda)\nObfuscate(ragnhild, eveleen)\nScrabbly(siobhan)\nSalivate(siobhan, rosmunda)\nObfuscate(siobhan, ragnhild)\nPerish(siobhan, rosmunda)\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) -> Perish(x, siobhan))\nforall x (Obfuscate(x, eveleen) and Unpunctual(eveleen) -> Scrabbly(eveleen))\n\nnot Salivate(rosmunda, ragnhild)\n\ntherefore Salivate(rosmunda, ragnhild)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The annissa is interior. The annissa jeer the aridatha. The annissa unsay the genny. The genny is unpotted. The genny raft the dexter. The genny jeer the annissa. The dexter raft the genny. The dexter jeer the annissa. The aridatha is unpotted. The aridatha raft the genny. The aridatha jeer the dexter. The aridatha unsay the genny. If something is unpotted then it unsay the aridatha. If something jeer the annissa and the annissa is interior then the annissa is unpotted. The aridatha unsay the aridatha.", "logic": "\nInterior(annissa)\nJeer(annissa, aridatha)\nUnsay(annissa, genny)\nUnpotted(genny)\nRaft(genny, dexter)\nJeer(genny, annissa)\nRaft(dexter, genny)\nJeer(dexter, annissa)\nUnpotted(aridatha)\nRaft(aridatha, genny)\nJeer(aridatha, dexter)\nUnsay(aridatha, genny)\nforall x (Unpotted(x) -> Unsay(x, aridatha))\nforall x (Jeer(x, annissa) and Interior(annissa) -> Unpotted(annissa))\n\nUnsay(aridatha, aridatha)\n\nUnpotted(aridatha) and forall x (Unpotted(x) -> Unsay(x, aridatha)) -> therefore Unsay(aridatha, aridatha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The gen is resolved. The gen unhallow the nara. The gen parallel the marcel. The marcel is digitate. The marcel extirpate the otis. The marcel unhallow the gen. The otis extirpate the marcel. The otis unhallow the gen. The nara is digitate. The nara extirpate the marcel. The nara unhallow the otis. The nara parallel the marcel. If something is digitate then it parallel the nara. If something unhallow the gen and the gen is resolved then the gen is digitate. The nara does not see the nara.", "logic": "\nResolved(gen)\nUnhallow(gen, nara)\nParallel(gen, marcel)\nDigitate(marcel)\nExtirpate(marcel, otis)\nUnhallow(marcel, gen)\nExtirpate(otis, marcel)\nUnhallow(otis, gen)\nDigitate(nara)\nExtirpate(nara, marcel)\nUnhallow(nara, otis)\nParallel(nara, marcel)\nforall x (Digitate(x) -> Parallel(x, nara))\nforall x (Unhallow(x, gen) and Resolved(gen) -> Digitate(gen))\n\nnot Parallel(nara, nara)\n\nDigitate(nara) and forall x (Digitate(x) -> Parallel(x, nara)) -> therefore Parallel(nara, nara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The brynna is dampish. The brynna paganize the joselyn. The brynna mine the aleecia. The aleecia is closed. The aleecia hale the kala. The aleecia paganize the brynna. The kala hale the aleecia. The kala paganize the brynna. The joselyn is closed. The joselyn hale the aleecia. The joselyn paganize the kala. The joselyn mine the aleecia. If something is closed then it mine the joselyn. If something paganize the brynna and the brynna is dampish then the brynna is closed. The brynna mine the joselyn.", "logic": "\nDampish(brynna)\nPaganize(brynna, joselyn)\nMine(brynna, aleecia)\nClosed(aleecia)\nHale(aleecia, kala)\nPaganize(aleecia, brynna)\nHale(kala, aleecia)\nPaganize(kala, brynna)\nClosed(joselyn)\nHale(joselyn, aleecia)\nPaganize(joselyn, kala)\nMine(joselyn, aleecia)\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Mine(x, joselyn))\nforall x (Paganize(x, brynna) and Dampish(brynna) -> Closed(brynna))\n\nMine(brynna, joselyn)\n\nPaganize(aleecia, brynna) and Dampish(brynna) and forall x (Paganize(x, brynna) and Dampish(brynna) -> Closed(brynna)) -> therefore Closed(brynna) Closed(brynna) and forall x (Closed(x) -> Mine(x, joselyn)) -> therefore Mine(brynna, joselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The hyman is dapper. The hyman underwrite the garcon. The hyman wilt the pasquale. The pasquale is delphian. The pasquale sunburn the katheleen. The pasquale underwrite the hyman. The katheleen sunburn the pasquale. The katheleen underwrite the hyman. The garcon is delphian. The garcon sunburn the pasquale. The garcon underwrite the katheleen. The garcon wilt the pasquale. If something is delphian then it wilt the garcon. If something underwrite the hyman and the hyman is dapper then the hyman is delphian. The hyman does not see the garcon.", "logic": "\nDapper(hyman)\nUnderwrite(hyman, garcon)\nWilt(hyman, pasquale)\nDelphian(pasquale)\nSunburn(pasquale, katheleen)\nUnderwrite(pasquale, hyman)\nSunburn(katheleen, pasquale)\nUnderwrite(katheleen, hyman)\nDelphian(garcon)\nSunburn(garcon, pasquale)\nUnderwrite(garcon, katheleen)\nWilt(garcon, pasquale)\nforall x (Delphian(x) -> Wilt(x, garcon))\nforall x (Underwrite(x, hyman) and Dapper(hyman) -> Delphian(hyman))\n\nnot Wilt(hyman, garcon)\n\nUnderwrite(pasquale, hyman) and Dapper(hyman) and forall x (Underwrite(x, hyman) and Dapper(hyman) -> Delphian(hyman)) -> therefore Delphian(hyman) Delphian(hyman) and forall x (Delphian(x) -> Wilt(x, garcon)) -> therefore Wilt(hyman, garcon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The welch is copulatory. The welch undeceive the marian. The welch exacerbate the brunhilde. The brunhilde is nonfissile. The brunhilde furcate the lynnett. The brunhilde undeceive the welch. The lynnett furcate the brunhilde. The lynnett undeceive the welch. The marian is nonfissile. The marian furcate the brunhilde. The marian undeceive the lynnett. The marian exacerbate the brunhilde. If something is nonfissile then it exacerbate the marian. If something undeceive the welch and the welch is copulatory then the welch is nonfissile. The lynnett does not see the marian.", "logic": "\nCopulatory(welch)\nUndeceive(welch, marian)\nExacerbate(welch, brunhilde)\nNonfissile(brunhilde)\nFurcate(brunhilde, lynnett)\nUndeceive(brunhilde, welch)\nFurcate(lynnett, brunhilde)\nUndeceive(lynnett, welch)\nNonfissile(marian)\nFurcate(marian, brunhilde)\nUndeceive(marian, lynnett)\nExacerbate(marian, brunhilde)\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Exacerbate(x, marian))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, welch) and Copulatory(welch) -> Nonfissile(welch))\n\nnot Exacerbate(lynnett, marian)\n\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Exacerbate(x, marian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The tove is tinny. The tove alight the marget. The tove recoup the brear. The brear is wavy. The brear brominate the alexei. The brear alight the tove. The alexei brominate the brear. The alexei alight the tove. The marget is wavy. The marget brominate the brear. The marget alight the alexei. The marget recoup the brear. If something is wavy then it recoup the marget. If something alight the tove and the tove is tinny then the tove is wavy. The alexei brominate the tove.", "logic": "\nTinny(tove)\nAlight(tove, marget)\nRecoup(tove, brear)\nWavy(brear)\nBrominate(brear, alexei)\nAlight(brear, tove)\nBrominate(alexei, brear)\nAlight(alexei, tove)\nWavy(marget)\nBrominate(marget, brear)\nAlight(marget, alexei)\nRecoup(marget, brear)\nforall x (Wavy(x) -> Recoup(x, marget))\nforall x (Alight(x, tove) and Tinny(tove) -> Wavy(tove))\n\nBrominate(alexei, tove)\n\nBrominate(alexei, tove) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The janean is frilly. The janean degas the hayley. The janean postmark the lonee. The lonee is rescued. The lonee literalize the leodora. The lonee degas the janean. The leodora literalize the lonee. The leodora degas the janean. The hayley is rescued. The hayley literalize the lonee. The hayley degas the leodora. The hayley postmark the lonee. If something is rescued then it postmark the hayley. If something degas the janean and the janean is frilly then the janean is rescued. The janean is not blue.", "logic": "\nFrilly(janean)\nDegas(janean, hayley)\nPostmark(janean, lonee)\nRescued(lonee)\nLiteralize(lonee, leodora)\nDegas(lonee, janean)\nLiteralize(leodora, lonee)\nDegas(leodora, janean)\nRescued(hayley)\nLiteralize(hayley, lonee)\nDegas(hayley, leodora)\nPostmark(hayley, lonee)\nforall x (Rescued(x) -> Postmark(x, hayley))\nforall x (Degas(x, janean) and Frilly(janean) -> Rescued(janean))\n\nnot Blue(janean)\n\nnot Blue(janean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The marketa is unofficial. The marketa ascertain the david. The marketa instill the joete. The joete is generative. The joete embalm the eleni. The joete ascertain the marketa. The eleni embalm the joete. The eleni ascertain the marketa. The david is generative. The david embalm the joete. The david ascertain the eleni. The david instill the joete. If something is generative then it instill the david. If something ascertain the marketa and the marketa is unofficial then the marketa is generative. The eleni embalm the eleni.", "logic": "\nUnofficial(marketa)\nAscertain(marketa, david)\nInstill(marketa, joete)\nGenerative(joete)\nEmbalm(joete, eleni)\nAscertain(joete, marketa)\nEmbalm(eleni, joete)\nAscertain(eleni, marketa)\nGenerative(david)\nEmbalm(david, joete)\nAscertain(david, eleni)\nInstill(david, joete)\nforall x (Generative(x) -> Instill(x, david))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, marketa) and Unofficial(marketa) -> Generative(marketa))\n\nEmbalm(eleni, eleni)\n\nEmbalm(eleni, eleni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The halie is autotomic. The halie remedy the scarlett. The halie forgive the mehetabel. The mehetabel is cuneiform. The mehetabel blanch the moll. The mehetabel remedy the halie. The moll blanch the mehetabel. The moll remedy the halie. The scarlett is cuneiform. The scarlett blanch the mehetabel. The scarlett remedy the moll. The scarlett forgive the mehetabel. If something is cuneiform then it forgive the scarlett. If something remedy the halie and the halie is autotomic then the halie is cuneiform. The halie does not see the moll.", "logic": "\nAutotomic(halie)\nRemedy(halie, scarlett)\nForgive(halie, mehetabel)\nCuneiform(mehetabel)\nBlanch(mehetabel, moll)\nRemedy(mehetabel, halie)\nBlanch(moll, mehetabel)\nRemedy(moll, halie)\nCuneiform(scarlett)\nBlanch(scarlett, mehetabel)\nRemedy(scarlett, moll)\nForgive(scarlett, mehetabel)\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Forgive(x, scarlett))\nforall x (Remedy(x, halie) and Autotomic(halie) -> Cuneiform(halie))\n\nnot Forgive(halie, moll)\n\nnot Forgive(halie, moll) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "The blinni is scapular. The blinni cricket the mercedes. The blinni enrich the guinevere. The guinevere is placental. The guinevere jumble the ivie. The guinevere cricket the blinni. The ivie jumble the guinevere. The ivie cricket the blinni. The mercedes is placental. The mercedes jumble the guinevere. The mercedes cricket the ivie. The mercedes enrich the guinevere. If something is placental then it enrich the mercedes. If something cricket the blinni and the blinni is scapular then the blinni is placental. The blinni is big.", "logic": "\nScapular(blinni)\nCricket(blinni, mercedes)\nEnrich(blinni, guinevere)\nPlacental(guinevere)\nJumble(guinevere, ivie)\nCricket(guinevere, blinni)\nJumble(ivie, guinevere)\nCricket(ivie, blinni)\nPlacental(mercedes)\nJumble(mercedes, guinevere)\nCricket(mercedes, ivie)\nEnrich(mercedes, guinevere)\nforall x (Placental(x) -> Enrich(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Cricket(x, blinni) and Scapular(blinni) -> Placental(blinni))\n\nBig(blinni)\n\nBig(blinni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1014"} {"premises": "Jaime is girlish. Eleni is flickering. Yanaton is wavelike. If something is ephemeral then it is diaphanous. Cold things are majestic. If something is girlish then it is ephemeral. Furry things are wavelike. If something is diaphanous then it is wavelike. Kind things are flickering. Yanaton is wavelike.", "logic": "\nGirlish(jaime)\nFlickering(eleni)\nWavelike(yanaton)\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) -> Diaphanous(x))\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Majestic(x))\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Flickering(x) -> Wavelike(x))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) -> Wavelike(x))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) -> Flickering(x))\n\nWavelike(yanaton)\n\ntherefore Wavelike(yanaton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Raphaela is cloying. Cordula is augitic. Ilka is voltarian. If something is warming then it is icky. Cold things are scalar. If something is cloying then it is warming. Furry things are voltarian. If something is icky then it is voltarian. Kind things are augitic. Ilka is not voltarian.", "logic": "\nCloying(raphaela)\nAugitic(cordula)\nVoltarian(ilka)\nforall x (Warming(x) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Cloying(x) -> Scalar(x))\nforall x (Cloying(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Icky(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) -> Augitic(x))\n\nnot Voltarian(ilka)\n\ntherefore Voltarian(ilka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Michal is staccato. Stephana is motley. Shayna is pinchbeck. If something is indebted then it is equitable. Cold things are destitute. If something is staccato then it is indebted. Furry things are pinchbeck. If something is equitable then it is pinchbeck. Kind things are motley. Michal is destitute.", "logic": "\nStaccato(michal)\nMotley(stephana)\nPinchbeck(shayna)\nforall x (Indebted(x) -> Equitable(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> Destitute(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Motley(x) -> Pinchbeck(x))\nforall x (Equitable(x) -> Pinchbeck(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) -> Motley(x))\n\nDestitute(michal)\n\nStaccato(michal) and forall x (Staccato(x) -> Destitute(x)) -> therefore Destitute(michal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Georgiana is fringed. Renelle is articled. Gratia is seamanly. If something is crucial then it is wilsonian. Cold things are atoxic. If something is fringed then it is crucial. Furry things are seamanly. If something is wilsonian then it is seamanly. Kind things are articled. Georgiana is not crucial.", "logic": "\nFringed(georgiana)\nArticled(renelle)\nSeamanly(gratia)\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\nforall x (Fringed(x) -> Atoxic(x))\nforall x (Fringed(x) -> Crucial(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Seamanly(x))\nforall x (Wilsonian(x) -> Seamanly(x))\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Articled(x))\n\nnot Crucial(georgiana)\n\nFringed(georgiana) and forall x (Fringed(x) -> Crucial(x)) -> therefore Crucial(georgiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Dan is following. Webb is jangly. Penrod is bigeminal. If something is vulnerable then it is southmost. Cold things are amazing. If something is following then it is vulnerable. Furry things are bigeminal. If something is southmost then it is bigeminal. Kind things are jangly. Dan is jangly.", "logic": "\nFollowing(dan)\nJangly(webb)\nBigeminal(penrod)\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Following(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Following(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) -> Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) -> Jangly(x))\n\nJangly(dan)\n\nFollowing(dan) and forall x (Following(x) -> Vulnerable(x)) -> therefore Vulnerable(dan) Vulnerable(dan) and forall x (Vulnerable(x) -> Jangly(x)) -> therefore Jangly(dan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Arlen is skimpy. Hope is subscribed. Melisse is hydrous. If something is indexless then it is umpteen. Cold things are knackered. If something is skimpy then it is indexless. Furry things are hydrous. If something is umpteen then it is hydrous. Kind things are subscribed. Arlen is not subscribed.", "logic": "\nSkimpy(arlen)\nSubscribed(hope)\nHydrous(melisse)\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Skimpy(x) -> Knackered(x))\nforall x (Skimpy(x) -> Indexless(x))\nforall x (Subscribed(x) -> Hydrous(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Hydrous(x))\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Subscribed(x))\n\nnot Subscribed(arlen)\n\nSkimpy(arlen) and forall x (Skimpy(x) -> Indexless(x)) -> therefore Indexless(arlen) Indexless(arlen) and forall x (Indexless(x) -> Subscribed(x)) -> therefore Subscribed(arlen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Sybilla is expository. Rita is downright. Bonita is liquid. If something is fascinated then it is punitive. Cold things are legion. If something is expository then it is fascinated. Furry things are liquid. If something is punitive then it is liquid. Kind things are downright. Rita is not fascinated.", "logic": "\nExpository(sybilla)\nDownright(rita)\nLiquid(bonita)\nforall x (Fascinated(x) -> Punitive(x))\nforall x (Expository(x) -> Legion(x))\nforall x (Expository(x) -> Fascinated(x))\nforall x (Downright(x) -> Liquid(x))\nforall x (Punitive(x) -> Liquid(x))\nforall x (Fascinated(x) -> Downright(x))\n\nnot Fascinated(rita)\n\nforall x (Expository(x) -> Fascinated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Sarah is blistering. Naomi is fallible. Ailina is auroral. If something is fragmented then it is center. Cold things are choosy. If something is blistering then it is fragmented. Furry things are auroral. If something is center then it is auroral. Kind things are fallible. Ailina is choosy.", "logic": "\nBlistering(sarah)\nFallible(naomi)\nAuroral(ailina)\nforall x (Fragmented(x) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Blistering(x) -> Choosy(x))\nforall x (Blistering(x) -> Fragmented(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> Auroral(x))\nforall x (Center(x) -> Auroral(x))\nforall x (Fragmented(x) -> Fallible(x))\n\nChoosy(ailina)\n\nforall x (Blistering(x) -> Choosy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Jonis is algonkian. Jeffry is measurable. Wilek is aleatory. If something is noncausal then it is infirm. Cold things are elysian. If something is algonkian then it is noncausal. Furry things are aleatory. If something is infirm then it is aleatory. Kind things are measurable. Wilek is not infirm.", "logic": "\nAlgonkian(jonis)\nMeasurable(jeffry)\nAleatory(wilek)\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Infirm(x))\nforall x (Algonkian(x) -> Elysian(x))\nforall x (Algonkian(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Measurable(x) -> Aleatory(x))\nforall x (Infirm(x) -> Aleatory(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Measurable(x))\n\nnot Infirm(wilek)\n\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Infirm(x)) <- forall x (Algonkian(x) -> Noncausal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Sidnee is anodyne. Pablo is adaptable. Sherye is lemony. If something is malignant then it is biological. Cold things are acanthotic. If something is anodyne then it is malignant. Furry things are lemony. If something is biological then it is lemony. Kind things are adaptable. Sherye is green.", "logic": "\nAnodyne(sidnee)\nAdaptable(pablo)\nLemony(sherye)\nforall x (Malignant(x) -> Biological(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Acanthotic(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Malignant(x))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Biological(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Malignant(x) -> Adaptable(x))\n\nGreen(sherye)\n\nGreen(sherye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Caleb is sublunar. Fayth is eponymous. Cammy is cadaverous. If something is greasy then it is synergetic. Cold things are relative. If something is sublunar then it is greasy. Furry things are cadaverous. If something is synergetic then it is cadaverous. Kind things are eponymous. Cammy is not sublunar.", "logic": "\nSublunar(caleb)\nEponymous(fayth)\nCadaverous(cammy)\nforall x (Greasy(x) -> Synergetic(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) -> Relative(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) -> Greasy(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Synergetic(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Greasy(x) -> Eponymous(x))\n\nnot Sublunar(cammy)\n\nnot Sublunar(cammy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Garry is pulverized. Bobinette is zaftig. Milena is sloppy. If something is prolusory then it is spotty. Cold things are disfigured. If something is pulverized then it is prolusory. Furry things are sloppy. If something is spotty then it is sloppy. Kind things are zaftig. Bobinette is green.", "logic": "\nPulverized(garry)\nZaftig(bobinette)\nSloppy(milena)\nforall x (Prolusory(x) -> Spotty(x))\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> Disfigured(x))\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> Prolusory(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) -> Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Prolusory(x) -> Zaftig(x))\n\nGreen(bobinette)\n\nGreen(bobinette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-555"} {"premises": "Hazel is lancelike. Hazel is emarginate. Donna is lancelike. Donna is bivariate. Donna is caesarian. Donna is orbiculate. Donna is tiring. Emmalyn is stitched. Emmalyn is tiring. Seana is bivariate. Seana is stitched. Seana is tiring. If something is lancelike then it is bivariate. If something is emarginate and stitched then it is bivariate. All orbiculate things are not emarginate. If something is orbiculate and not lancelike then it is not stitched. If something is lancelike then it is stitched. If something is bivariate then it is tiring. Quiet things are tiring. If Hazel is emarginate then Hazel is caesarian. Emmalyn is stitched.", "logic": "\nLancelike(hazel)\nEmarginate(hazel)\nLancelike(donna)\nBivariate(donna)\nCaesarian(donna)\nOrbiculate(donna)\nTiring(donna)\nStitched(emmalyn)\nTiring(emmalyn)\nBivariate(seana)\nStitched(seana)\nTiring(seana)\nforall x (Lancelike(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nforall x (Emarginate(x) and Stitched(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) -> not Emarginate(x))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and not Lancelike(x) -> not Stitched(x))\nforall x (Lancelike(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Bivariate(x) -> Tiring(x))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) -> Tiring(x))\nEmarginate(hazel) -> Caesarian(hazel)\n\nStitched(emmalyn)\n\ntherefore Stitched(emmalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Raychel is feathered. Raychel is uncheerful. Dorothea is feathered. Dorothea is cytologic. Dorothea is gnarly. Dorothea is beginning. Dorothea is heatless. Vivien is woolly. Vivien is heatless. Cinda is cytologic. Cinda is woolly. Cinda is heatless. If something is feathered then it is cytologic. If something is uncheerful and woolly then it is cytologic. All beginning things are not uncheerful. If something is beginning and not feathered then it is not woolly. If something is feathered then it is woolly. If something is cytologic then it is heatless. Quiet things are heatless. If Raychel is uncheerful then Raychel is gnarly. Dorothea is not feathered.", "logic": "\nFeathered(raychel)\nUncheerful(raychel)\nFeathered(dorothea)\nCytologic(dorothea)\nGnarly(dorothea)\nBeginning(dorothea)\nHeatless(dorothea)\nWoolly(vivien)\nHeatless(vivien)\nCytologic(cinda)\nWoolly(cinda)\nHeatless(cinda)\nforall x (Feathered(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Uncheerful(x) and Woolly(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Beginning(x) -> not Uncheerful(x))\nforall x (Beginning(x) and not Feathered(x) -> not Woolly(x))\nforall x (Feathered(x) -> Woolly(x))\nforall x (Cytologic(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Beginning(x) -> Heatless(x))\nUncheerful(raychel) -> Gnarly(raychel)\n\nnot Feathered(dorothea)\n\ntherefore Feathered(dorothea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Calley is worth. Calley is finable. Grady is worth. Grady is heatless. Grady is grasping. Grady is spatulate. Grady is unforced. Theo is functional. Theo is unforced. Bobinette is heatless. Bobinette is functional. Bobinette is unforced. If something is worth then it is heatless. If something is finable and functional then it is heatless. All spatulate things are not finable. If something is spatulate and not worth then it is not functional. If something is worth then it is functional. If something is heatless then it is unforced. Quiet things are unforced. If Calley is finable then Calley is grasping. Grady is functional.", "logic": "\nWorth(calley)\nFinable(calley)\nWorth(grady)\nHeatless(grady)\nGrasping(grady)\nSpatulate(grady)\nUnforced(grady)\nFunctional(theo)\nUnforced(theo)\nHeatless(bobinette)\nFunctional(bobinette)\nUnforced(bobinette)\nforall x (Worth(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Finable(x) and Functional(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> not Finable(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) and not Worth(x) -> not Functional(x))\nforall x (Worth(x) -> Functional(x))\nforall x (Heatless(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Unforced(x))\nFinable(calley) -> Grasping(calley)\n\nFunctional(grady)\n\nWorth(grady) and forall x (Worth(x) -> Functional(x)) -> therefore Functional(grady)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Ibby is bryophytic. Ibby is adscript. Magdaia is bryophytic. Magdaia is broached. Magdaia is buttoned. Magdaia is adaptative. Magdaia is minty. Gasper is upstairs. Gasper is minty. Benjy is broached. Benjy is upstairs. Benjy is minty. If something is bryophytic then it is broached. If something is adscript and upstairs then it is broached. All adaptative things are not adscript. If something is adaptative and not bryophytic then it is not upstairs. If something is bryophytic then it is upstairs. If something is broached then it is minty. Quiet things are minty. If Ibby is adscript then Ibby is buttoned. Ibby is not broached.", "logic": "\nBryophytic(ibby)\nAdscript(ibby)\nBryophytic(magdaia)\nBroached(magdaia)\nButtoned(magdaia)\nAdaptative(magdaia)\nMinty(magdaia)\nUpstairs(gasper)\nMinty(gasper)\nBroached(benjy)\nUpstairs(benjy)\nMinty(benjy)\nforall x (Bryophytic(x) -> Broached(x))\nforall x (Adscript(x) and Upstairs(x) -> Broached(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> not Adscript(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and not Bryophytic(x) -> not Upstairs(x))\nforall x (Bryophytic(x) -> Upstairs(x))\nforall x (Broached(x) -> Minty(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Minty(x))\nAdscript(ibby) -> Buttoned(ibby)\n\nnot Broached(ibby)\n\nBryophytic(ibby) and forall x (Bryophytic(x) -> Broached(x)) -> therefore Broached(ibby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Beryl is inapposite. Beryl is monarchal. Ailey is inapposite. Ailey is quotable. Ailey is wrenching. Ailey is probable. Ailey is contextual. Waite is shrinkable. Waite is contextual. Benito is quotable. Benito is shrinkable. Benito is contextual. If something is inapposite then it is quotable. If something is monarchal and shrinkable then it is quotable. All probable things are not monarchal. If something is probable and not inapposite then it is not shrinkable. If something is inapposite then it is shrinkable. If something is quotable then it is contextual. Quiet things are contextual. If Beryl is monarchal then Beryl is wrenching. Beryl is contextual.", "logic": "\nInapposite(beryl)\nMonarchal(beryl)\nInapposite(ailey)\nQuotable(ailey)\nWrenching(ailey)\nProbable(ailey)\nContextual(ailey)\nShrinkable(waite)\nContextual(waite)\nQuotable(benito)\nShrinkable(benito)\nContextual(benito)\nforall x (Inapposite(x) -> Quotable(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) and Shrinkable(x) -> Quotable(x))\nforall x (Probable(x) -> not Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Probable(x) and not Inapposite(x) -> not Shrinkable(x))\nforall x (Inapposite(x) -> Shrinkable(x))\nforall x (Quotable(x) -> Contextual(x))\nforall x (Probable(x) -> Contextual(x))\nMonarchal(beryl) -> Wrenching(beryl)\n\nContextual(beryl)\n\nInapposite(beryl) and forall x (Inapposite(x) -> Quotable(x)) -> therefore Quotable(beryl) Quotable(beryl) and forall x (Quotable(x) -> Contextual(x)) -> therefore Contextual(beryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Krissie is tenacious. Krissie is vaporous. Dwaine is tenacious. Dwaine is atonal. Dwaine is avestan. Dwaine is roaring. Dwaine is encyclical. Goldina is engaged. Goldina is encyclical. Nessie is atonal. Nessie is engaged. Nessie is encyclical. If something is tenacious then it is atonal. If something is vaporous and engaged then it is atonal. All roaring things are not vaporous. If something is roaring and not tenacious then it is not engaged. If something is tenacious then it is engaged. If something is atonal then it is encyclical. Quiet things are encyclical. If Krissie is vaporous then Krissie is avestan. Krissie is not encyclical.", "logic": "\nTenacious(krissie)\nVaporous(krissie)\nTenacious(dwaine)\nAtonal(dwaine)\nAvestan(dwaine)\nRoaring(dwaine)\nEncyclical(dwaine)\nEngaged(goldina)\nEncyclical(goldina)\nAtonal(nessie)\nEngaged(nessie)\nEncyclical(nessie)\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Atonal(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) and Engaged(x) -> Atonal(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) -> not Vaporous(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) and not Tenacious(x) -> not Engaged(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Engaged(x))\nforall x (Atonal(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nVaporous(krissie) -> Avestan(krissie)\n\nnot Encyclical(krissie)\n\nTenacious(krissie) and forall x (Tenacious(x) -> Atonal(x)) -> therefore Atonal(krissie) Atonal(krissie) and forall x (Atonal(x) -> Encyclical(x)) -> therefore Encyclical(krissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Glennie is boric. Glennie is circuitous. Blakelee is boric. Blakelee is malted. Blakelee is envious. Blakelee is sonsie. Blakelee is unlit. Latashia is unalloyed. Latashia is unlit. Viole is malted. Viole is unalloyed. Viole is unlit. If something is boric then it is malted. If something is circuitous and unalloyed then it is malted. All sonsie things are not circuitous. If something is sonsie and not boric then it is not unalloyed. If something is boric then it is unalloyed. If something is malted then it is unlit. Quiet things are unlit. If Glennie is circuitous then Glennie is envious. Latashia is not malted.", "logic": "\nBoric(glennie)\nCircuitous(glennie)\nBoric(blakelee)\nMalted(blakelee)\nEnvious(blakelee)\nSonsie(blakelee)\nUnlit(blakelee)\nUnalloyed(latashia)\nUnlit(latashia)\nMalted(viole)\nUnalloyed(viole)\nUnlit(viole)\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Malted(x))\nforall x (Circuitous(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> Malted(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) -> not Circuitous(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) and not Boric(x) -> not Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Malted(x) -> Unlit(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) -> Unlit(x))\nCircuitous(glennie) -> Envious(glennie)\n\nnot Malted(latashia)\n\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Malted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Lona is climatic. Lona is tremulous. Cletus is climatic. Cletus is stringy. Cletus is scraggly. Cletus is illusional. Cletus is unstated. Clement is cursorial. Clement is unstated. Geof is stringy. Geof is cursorial. Geof is unstated. If something is climatic then it is stringy. If something is tremulous and cursorial then it is stringy. All illusional things are not tremulous. If something is illusional and not climatic then it is not cursorial. If something is climatic then it is cursorial. If something is stringy then it is unstated. Quiet things are unstated. If Lona is tremulous then Lona is scraggly. Geof is climatic.", "logic": "\nClimatic(lona)\nTremulous(lona)\nClimatic(cletus)\nStringy(cletus)\nScraggly(cletus)\nIllusional(cletus)\nUnstated(cletus)\nCursorial(clement)\nUnstated(clement)\nStringy(geof)\nCursorial(geof)\nUnstated(geof)\nforall x (Climatic(x) -> Stringy(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and Cursorial(x) -> Stringy(x))\nforall x (Illusional(x) -> not Tremulous(x))\nforall x (Illusional(x) and not Climatic(x) -> not Cursorial(x))\nforall x (Climatic(x) -> Cursorial(x))\nforall x (Stringy(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Illusional(x) -> Unstated(x))\nTremulous(lona) -> Scraggly(lona)\n\nClimatic(geof)\n\nClimatic(geof) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Jeramie is dactylic. Jeramie is buxom. Love is dactylic. Love is overhanded. Love is extradural. Love is glinting. Love is grumous. Ajai is weary. Ajai is grumous. Ruthi is overhanded. Ruthi is weary. Ruthi is grumous. If something is dactylic then it is overhanded. If something is buxom and weary then it is overhanded. All glinting things are not buxom. If something is glinting and not dactylic then it is not weary. If something is dactylic then it is weary. If something is overhanded then it is grumous. Quiet things are grumous. If Jeramie is buxom then Jeramie is extradural. Ajai is not glinting.", "logic": "\nDactylic(jeramie)\nBuxom(jeramie)\nDactylic(love)\nOverhanded(love)\nExtradural(love)\nGlinting(love)\nGrumous(love)\nWeary(ajai)\nGrumous(ajai)\nOverhanded(ruthi)\nWeary(ruthi)\nGrumous(ruthi)\nforall x (Dactylic(x) -> Overhanded(x))\nforall x (Buxom(x) and Weary(x) -> Overhanded(x))\nforall x (Glinting(x) -> not Buxom(x))\nforall x (Glinting(x) and not Dactylic(x) -> not Weary(x))\nforall x (Dactylic(x) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Overhanded(x) -> Grumous(x))\nforall x (Glinting(x) -> Grumous(x))\nBuxom(jeramie) -> Extradural(jeramie)\n\nnot Glinting(ajai)\n\nnot Glinting(ajai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Ewan is prodigious. Ewan is gratis. Maurits is prodigious. Maurits is unseeable. Maurits is droopy. Maurits is regular. Maurits is avian. Dorri is meteoritic. Dorri is avian. Butler is unseeable. Butler is meteoritic. Butler is avian. If something is prodigious then it is unseeable. If something is gratis and meteoritic then it is unseeable. All regular things are not gratis. If something is regular and not prodigious then it is not meteoritic. If something is prodigious then it is meteoritic. If something is unseeable then it is avian. Quiet things are avian. If Ewan is gratis then Ewan is droopy. Dorri is prodigious.", "logic": "\nProdigious(ewan)\nGratis(ewan)\nProdigious(maurits)\nUnseeable(maurits)\nDroopy(maurits)\nRegular(maurits)\nAvian(maurits)\nMeteoritic(dorri)\nAvian(dorri)\nUnseeable(butler)\nMeteoritic(butler)\nAvian(butler)\nforall x (Prodigious(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) and Meteoritic(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Regular(x) -> not Gratis(x))\nforall x (Regular(x) and not Prodigious(x) -> not Meteoritic(x))\nforall x (Prodigious(x) -> Meteoritic(x))\nforall x (Unseeable(x) -> Avian(x))\nforall x (Regular(x) -> Avian(x))\nGratis(ewan) -> Droopy(ewan)\n\nProdigious(dorri)\n\nProdigious(dorri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Elizabeth is untrue. Elizabeth is cernuous. Darwin is untrue. Darwin is bismuthic. Darwin is cupric. Darwin is donatist. Darwin is pernickety. Anjanette is shiftless. Anjanette is pernickety. Christine is bismuthic. Christine is shiftless. Christine is pernickety. If something is untrue then it is bismuthic. If something is cernuous and shiftless then it is bismuthic. All donatist things are not cernuous. If something is donatist and not untrue then it is not shiftless. If something is untrue then it is shiftless. If something is bismuthic then it is pernickety. Quiet things are pernickety. If Elizabeth is cernuous then Elizabeth is cupric. Christine is not cupric.", "logic": "\nUntrue(elizabeth)\nCernuous(elizabeth)\nUntrue(darwin)\nBismuthic(darwin)\nCupric(darwin)\nDonatist(darwin)\nPernickety(darwin)\nShiftless(anjanette)\nPernickety(anjanette)\nBismuthic(christine)\nShiftless(christine)\nPernickety(christine)\nforall x (Untrue(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Cernuous(x) and Shiftless(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Donatist(x) -> not Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Donatist(x) and not Untrue(x) -> not Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Untrue(x) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> Pernickety(x))\nforall x (Donatist(x) -> Pernickety(x))\nCernuous(elizabeth) -> Cupric(elizabeth)\n\nnot Cupric(christine)\n\nnot Cupric(christine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Piper is scrubby. Piper is anoestrous. Gwendolin is scrubby. Gwendolin is cosmic. Gwendolin is bicornate. Gwendolin is neandertal. Gwendolin is wearing. Leda is zestful. Leda is wearing. Vito is cosmic. Vito is zestful. Vito is wearing. If something is scrubby then it is cosmic. If something is anoestrous and zestful then it is cosmic. All neandertal things are not anoestrous. If something is neandertal and not scrubby then it is not zestful. If something is scrubby then it is zestful. If something is cosmic then it is wearing. Quiet things are wearing. If Piper is anoestrous then Piper is bicornate. Piper is neandertal.", "logic": "\nScrubby(piper)\nAnoestrous(piper)\nScrubby(gwendolin)\nCosmic(gwendolin)\nBicornate(gwendolin)\nNeandertal(gwendolin)\nWearing(gwendolin)\nZestful(leda)\nWearing(leda)\nCosmic(vito)\nZestful(vito)\nWearing(vito)\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Cosmic(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and Zestful(x) -> Cosmic(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> not Anoestrous(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) and not Scrubby(x) -> not Zestful(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Zestful(x))\nforall x (Cosmic(x) -> Wearing(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> Wearing(x))\nAnoestrous(piper) -> Bicornate(piper)\n\nNeandertal(piper)\n\nNeandertal(piper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1020"} {"premises": "Dennis is creedal. Dennis is unrigged. Donetta is soluble. Donetta is syncretic. Donetta is regent. Alejandro is autoimmune. Alejandro is unrigged. If someone is regent then they are activating. Quiet people are activating. If Alejandro is creedal then Alejandro is regent. Blue, autoimmune people are creedal. Red, regent people are soluble. All unrigged people are soluble. Big people are soluble. If Donetta is unrigged then Donetta is creedal. Alejandro is autoimmune.", "logic": "\nCreedal(dennis)\nUnrigged(dennis)\nSoluble(donetta)\nSyncretic(donetta)\nRegent(donetta)\nAutoimmune(alejandro)\nUnrigged(alejandro)\nforall x (Regent(x) -> Activating(x))\nforall x (Creedal(x) -> Activating(x))\nCreedal(alejandro) -> Regent(alejandro)\nforall x (Soluble(x) and Autoimmune(x) -> Creedal(x))\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) and Regent(x) -> Soluble(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) -> Soluble(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) -> Soluble(x))\nUnrigged(donetta) -> Creedal(donetta)\n\nAutoimmune(alejandro)\n\ntherefore Autoimmune(alejandro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Saree is vaulting. Saree is frictional. Olivia is aboveboard. Olivia is deadlocked. Olivia is bodacious. Nixie is orphaned. Nixie is frictional. If someone is bodacious then they are formulated. Quiet people are formulated. If Nixie is vaulting then Nixie is bodacious. Blue, orphaned people are vaulting. Red, bodacious people are aboveboard. All frictional people are aboveboard. Big people are aboveboard. If Olivia is frictional then Olivia is vaulting. Olivia is not bodacious.", "logic": "\nVaulting(saree)\nFrictional(saree)\nAboveboard(olivia)\nDeadlocked(olivia)\nBodacious(olivia)\nOrphaned(nixie)\nFrictional(nixie)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Formulated(x))\nforall x (Vaulting(x) -> Formulated(x))\nVaulting(nixie) -> Bodacious(nixie)\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) and Orphaned(x) -> Vaulting(x))\nforall x (Orphaned(x) and Bodacious(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Frictional(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Formulated(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nFrictional(olivia) -> Vaulting(olivia)\n\nnot Bodacious(olivia)\n\ntherefore Bodacious(olivia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Karisa is saltlike. Karisa is apheretic. Nelli is marmoreal. Nelli is enveloping. Nelli is legible. Erastus is savorless. Erastus is apheretic. If someone is legible then they are mucose. Quiet people are mucose. If Erastus is saltlike then Erastus is legible. Blue, savorless people are saltlike. Red, legible people are marmoreal. All apheretic people are marmoreal. Big people are marmoreal. If Nelli is apheretic then Nelli is saltlike. Nelli is mucose.", "logic": "\nSaltlike(karisa)\nApheretic(karisa)\nMarmoreal(nelli)\nEnveloping(nelli)\nLegible(nelli)\nSavorless(erastus)\nApheretic(erastus)\nforall x (Legible(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Saltlike(x) -> Mucose(x))\nSaltlike(erastus) -> Legible(erastus)\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) and Savorless(x) -> Saltlike(x))\nforall x (Savorless(x) and Legible(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Apheretic(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Mucose(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\nApheretic(nelli) -> Saltlike(nelli)\n\nMucose(nelli)\n\nLegible(nelli) and forall x (Legible(x) -> Mucose(x)) -> therefore Mucose(nelli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Ramonda is neurotoxic. Ramonda is anxiolytic. Ainslee is courteous. Ainslee is palpebrate. Ainslee is barricaded. Velvet is stupid. Velvet is anxiolytic. If someone is barricaded then they are mesonic. Quiet people are mesonic. If Velvet is neurotoxic then Velvet is barricaded. Blue, stupid people are neurotoxic. Red, barricaded people are courteous. All anxiolytic people are courteous. Big people are courteous. If Ainslee is anxiolytic then Ainslee is neurotoxic. Ramonda is not mesonic.", "logic": "\nNeurotoxic(ramonda)\nAnxiolytic(ramonda)\nCourteous(ainslee)\nPalpebrate(ainslee)\nBarricaded(ainslee)\nStupid(velvet)\nAnxiolytic(velvet)\nforall x (Barricaded(x) -> Mesonic(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> Mesonic(x))\nNeurotoxic(velvet) -> Barricaded(velvet)\nforall x (Courteous(x) and Stupid(x) -> Neurotoxic(x))\nforall x (Stupid(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Courteous(x))\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Courteous(x))\nforall x (Mesonic(x) -> Courteous(x))\nAnxiolytic(ainslee) -> Neurotoxic(ainslee)\n\nnot Mesonic(ramonda)\n\nNeurotoxic(ramonda) and forall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> Mesonic(x)) -> therefore Mesonic(ramonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Noe is matured. Noe is propitious. Skelly is mesodermal. Skelly is blonde. Skelly is paved. Lara is mitigative. Lara is propitious. If someone is paved then they are nazarene. Quiet people are nazarene. If Lara is matured then Lara is paved. Blue, mitigative people are matured. Red, paved people are mesodermal. All propitious people are mesodermal. Big people are mesodermal. If Skelly is propitious then Skelly is matured. Lara is matured.", "logic": "\nMatured(noe)\nPropitious(noe)\nMesodermal(skelly)\nBlonde(skelly)\nPaved(skelly)\nMitigative(lara)\nPropitious(lara)\nforall x (Paved(x) -> Nazarene(x))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Nazarene(x))\nMatured(lara) -> Paved(lara)\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Mitigative(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Mitigative(x) and Paved(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Nazarene(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nPropitious(skelly) -> Matured(skelly)\n\nMatured(lara)\n\nPropitious(lara) and forall x (Propitious(x) -> Mesodermal(x)) -> therefore Mesodermal(lara) Mesodermal(lara) and Mitigative(lara) and forall x (Mesodermal(x) and Mitigative(x) -> Matured(x)) -> therefore Matured(lara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Wolfie is zolaesque. Wolfie is unadvised. Roland is brainish. Roland is flinty. Roland is trenchant. Roslyn is sublunar. Roslyn is unadvised. If someone is trenchant then they are pneumatic. Quiet people are pneumatic. If Roslyn is zolaesque then Roslyn is trenchant. Blue, sublunar people are zolaesque. Red, trenchant people are brainish. All unadvised people are brainish. Big people are brainish. If Roland is unadvised then Roland is zolaesque. Roslyn is not zolaesque.", "logic": "\nZolaesque(wolfie)\nUnadvised(wolfie)\nBrainish(roland)\nFlinty(roland)\nTrenchant(roland)\nSublunar(roslyn)\nUnadvised(roslyn)\nforall x (Trenchant(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nZolaesque(roslyn) -> Trenchant(roslyn)\nforall x (Brainish(x) and Sublunar(x) -> Zolaesque(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Brainish(x))\nforall x (Unadvised(x) -> Brainish(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) -> Brainish(x))\nUnadvised(roland) -> Zolaesque(roland)\n\nnot Zolaesque(roslyn)\n\nUnadvised(roslyn) and forall x (Unadvised(x) -> Brainish(x)) -> therefore Brainish(roslyn) Brainish(roslyn) and Sublunar(roslyn) and forall x (Brainish(x) and Sublunar(x) -> Zolaesque(x)) -> therefore Zolaesque(roslyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Janet is flowing. Janet is unwed. Henryetta is preceding. Henryetta is labile. Henryetta is deprived. Quigman is eidetic. Quigman is unwed. If someone is deprived then they are walleyed. Quiet people are walleyed. If Quigman is flowing then Quigman is deprived. Blue, eidetic people are flowing. Red, deprived people are preceding. All unwed people are preceding. Big people are preceding. If Henryetta is unwed then Henryetta is flowing. Henryetta is not flowing.", "logic": "\nFlowing(janet)\nUnwed(janet)\nPreceding(henryetta)\nLabile(henryetta)\nDeprived(henryetta)\nEidetic(quigman)\nUnwed(quigman)\nforall x (Deprived(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nFlowing(quigman) -> Deprived(quigman)\nforall x (Preceding(x) and Eidetic(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Eidetic(x) and Deprived(x) -> Preceding(x))\nforall x (Unwed(x) -> Preceding(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) -> Preceding(x))\nUnwed(henryetta) -> Flowing(henryetta)\n\nnot Flowing(henryetta)\n\nforall x (Preceding(x) and Eidetic(x) -> Flowing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Kattie is doable. Kattie is kingly. Guthrie is warring. Guthrie is cathodic. Guthrie is colloquial. Mae is tearful. Mae is kingly. If someone is colloquial then they are acroscopic. Quiet people are acroscopic. If Mae is doable then Mae is colloquial. Blue, tearful people are doable. Red, colloquial people are warring. All kingly people are warring. Big people are warring. If Guthrie is kingly then Guthrie is doable. Mae is cathodic.", "logic": "\nDoable(kattie)\nKingly(kattie)\nWarring(guthrie)\nCathodic(guthrie)\nColloquial(guthrie)\nTearful(mae)\nKingly(mae)\nforall x (Colloquial(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\nforall x (Doable(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\nDoable(mae) -> Colloquial(mae)\nforall x (Warring(x) and Tearful(x) -> Doable(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) and Colloquial(x) -> Warring(x))\nforall x (Kingly(x) -> Warring(x))\nforall x (Acroscopic(x) -> Warring(x))\nKingly(guthrie) -> Doable(guthrie)\n\nCathodic(mae)\n\nCathodic(mae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Lenard is techy. Lenard is bound. Betteann is unmerciful. Betteann is unbalanced. Betteann is projected. Fina is harmful. Fina is bound. If someone is projected then they are cuspidal. Quiet people are cuspidal. If Fina is techy then Fina is projected. Blue, harmful people are techy. Red, projected people are unmerciful. All bound people are unmerciful. Big people are unmerciful. If Betteann is bound then Betteann is techy. Betteann is not bound.", "logic": "\nTechy(lenard)\nBound(lenard)\nUnmerciful(betteann)\nUnbalanced(betteann)\nProjected(betteann)\nHarmful(fina)\nBound(fina)\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Techy(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nTechy(fina) -> Projected(fina)\nforall x (Unmerciful(x) and Harmful(x) -> Techy(x))\nforall x (Harmful(x) and Projected(x) -> Unmerciful(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) -> Unmerciful(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) -> Unmerciful(x))\nBound(betteann) -> Techy(betteann)\n\nnot Bound(betteann)\n\nnot Bound(betteann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Cyrus is clangorous. Cyrus is hyoid. Karita is lxxvi. Karita is eyed. Karita is matted. Rocky is fusty. Rocky is hyoid. If someone is matted then they are mephitic. Quiet people are mephitic. If Rocky is clangorous then Rocky is matted. Blue, fusty people are clangorous. Red, matted people are lxxvi. All hyoid people are lxxvi. Big people are lxxvi. If Karita is hyoid then Karita is clangorous. Karita is fusty.", "logic": "\nClangorous(cyrus)\nHyoid(cyrus)\nLxxvi(karita)\nEyed(karita)\nMatted(karita)\nFusty(rocky)\nHyoid(rocky)\nforall x (Matted(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Clangorous(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nClangorous(rocky) -> Matted(rocky)\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) and Fusty(x) -> Clangorous(x))\nforall x (Fusty(x) and Matted(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Hyoid(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Mephitic(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nHyoid(karita) -> Clangorous(karita)\n\nFusty(karita)\n\nFusty(karita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Dorothy is plausive. Dorothy is usurious. Ashely is real. Ashely is veiled. Ashely is diligent. Sidoney is boisterous. Sidoney is usurious. If someone is diligent then they are washy. Quiet people are washy. If Sidoney is plausive then Sidoney is diligent. Blue, boisterous people are plausive. Red, diligent people are real. All usurious people are real. Big people are real. If Ashely is usurious then Ashely is plausive. Dorothy is not veiled.", "logic": "\nPlausive(dorothy)\nUsurious(dorothy)\nReal(ashely)\nVeiled(ashely)\nDiligent(ashely)\nBoisterous(sidoney)\nUsurious(sidoney)\nforall x (Diligent(x) -> Washy(x))\nforall x (Plausive(x) -> Washy(x))\nPlausive(sidoney) -> Diligent(sidoney)\nforall x (Real(x) and Boisterous(x) -> Plausive(x))\nforall x (Boisterous(x) and Diligent(x) -> Real(x))\nforall x (Usurious(x) -> Real(x))\nforall x (Washy(x) -> Real(x))\nUsurious(ashely) -> Plausive(ashely)\n\nnot Veiled(dorothy)\n\nnot Veiled(dorothy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "Caleb is nonstick. Caleb is gravid. Donica is arbitrary. Donica is concealing. Donica is shrill. Marsh is raspy. Marsh is gravid. If someone is shrill then they are healthy. Quiet people are healthy. If Marsh is nonstick then Marsh is shrill. Blue, raspy people are nonstick. Red, shrill people are arbitrary. All gravid people are arbitrary. Big people are arbitrary. If Donica is gravid then Donica is nonstick. Caleb is shrill.", "logic": "\nNonstick(caleb)\nGravid(caleb)\nArbitrary(donica)\nConcealing(donica)\nShrill(donica)\nRaspy(marsh)\nGravid(marsh)\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Healthy(x))\nforall x (Nonstick(x) -> Healthy(x))\nNonstick(marsh) -> Shrill(marsh)\nforall x (Arbitrary(x) and Raspy(x) -> Nonstick(x))\nforall x (Raspy(x) and Shrill(x) -> Arbitrary(x))\nforall x (Gravid(x) -> Arbitrary(x))\nforall x (Healthy(x) -> Arbitrary(x))\nGravid(donica) -> Nonstick(donica)\n\nShrill(caleb)\n\nShrill(caleb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-388"} {"premises": "The grissel metrify the hyacinthe. The grissel metrify the kala. The grissel is angulate. The grissel is timorese. The hyacinthe metrify the grissel. The hyacinthe is timorese. The hyacinthe pirate the grissel. The hyacinthe pirate the kala. The hyacinthe plasticise the grissel. The hyacinthe plasticise the kala. The kala is timorese. The kala plasticise the grissel. If something metrify the kala and the kala pirate the grissel then it metrify the grissel. If something is timorese and it pirate the kala then the kala pirate the grissel. If something plasticise the hyacinthe and it plasticise the kala then the kala metrify the grissel. The hyacinthe metrify the grissel.", "logic": "\nMetrify(grissel, hyacinthe)\nMetrify(grissel, kala)\nAngulate(grissel)\nTimorese(grissel)\nMetrify(hyacinthe, grissel)\nTimorese(hyacinthe)\nPirate(hyacinthe, grissel)\nPirate(hyacinthe, kala)\nPlasticise(hyacinthe, grissel)\nPlasticise(hyacinthe, kala)\nTimorese(kala)\nPlasticise(kala, grissel)\nforall x (Metrify(x, kala) and Pirate(kala, grissel) -> Metrify(x, grissel))\nforall x (Timorese(x) and Pirate(x, kala) -> Pirate(kala, grissel))\nforall x (Plasticise(x, hyacinthe) and Plasticise(x, kala) -> Metrify(kala, grissel))\n\nMetrify(hyacinthe, grissel)\n\ntherefore Metrify(hyacinthe, grissel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The bartie eventuate the nicky. The bartie eventuate the rochelle. The bartie is miniscule. The bartie is untutored. The nicky eventuate the bartie. The nicky is untutored. The nicky revenge the bartie. The nicky revenge the rochelle. The nicky straighten the bartie. The nicky straighten the rochelle. The rochelle is untutored. The rochelle straighten the bartie. If something eventuate the rochelle and the rochelle revenge the bartie then it eventuate the bartie. If something is untutored and it revenge the rochelle then the rochelle revenge the bartie. If something straighten the nicky and it straighten the rochelle then the rochelle eventuate the bartie. The rochelle does not see the bartie.", "logic": "\nEventuate(bartie, nicky)\nEventuate(bartie, rochelle)\nMiniscule(bartie)\nUntutored(bartie)\nEventuate(nicky, bartie)\nUntutored(nicky)\nRevenge(nicky, bartie)\nRevenge(nicky, rochelle)\nStraighten(nicky, bartie)\nStraighten(nicky, rochelle)\nUntutored(rochelle)\nStraighten(rochelle, bartie)\nforall x (Eventuate(x, rochelle) and Revenge(rochelle, bartie) -> Eventuate(x, bartie))\nforall x (Untutored(x) and Revenge(x, rochelle) -> Revenge(rochelle, bartie))\nforall x (Straighten(x, nicky) and Straighten(x, rochelle) -> Eventuate(rochelle, bartie))\n\nnot Straighten(rochelle, bartie)\n\ntherefore Straighten(rochelle, bartie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The lydie slough the erinna. The lydie slough the ardelia. The lydie is alterable. The lydie is filled. The erinna slough the lydie. The erinna is filled. The erinna enquire the lydie. The erinna enquire the ardelia. The erinna congeal the lydie. The erinna congeal the ardelia. The ardelia is filled. The ardelia congeal the lydie. If something slough the ardelia and the ardelia enquire the lydie then it slough the lydie. If something is filled and it enquire the ardelia then the ardelia enquire the lydie. If something congeal the erinna and it congeal the ardelia then the ardelia slough the lydie. The ardelia enquire the lydie.", "logic": "\nSlough(lydie, erinna)\nSlough(lydie, ardelia)\nAlterable(lydie)\nFilled(lydie)\nSlough(erinna, lydie)\nFilled(erinna)\nEnquire(erinna, lydie)\nEnquire(erinna, ardelia)\nCongeal(erinna, lydie)\nCongeal(erinna, ardelia)\nFilled(ardelia)\nCongeal(ardelia, lydie)\nforall x (Slough(x, ardelia) and Enquire(ardelia, lydie) -> Slough(x, lydie))\nforall x (Filled(x) and Enquire(x, ardelia) -> Enquire(ardelia, lydie))\nforall x (Congeal(x, erinna) and Congeal(x, ardelia) -> Slough(ardelia, lydie))\n\nEnquire(ardelia, lydie)\n\nFilled(erinna) and Enquire(erinna, ardelia) and forall x (Filled(x) and Enquire(x, ardelia) -> Enquire(ardelia, lydie)) -> therefore Enquire(ardelia, lydie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The diann confirm the adams. The diann confirm the anson. The diann is cuneal. The diann is afebrile. The adams confirm the diann. The adams is afebrile. The adams stink the diann. The adams stink the anson. The adams evince the diann. The adams evince the anson. The anson is afebrile. The anson evince the diann. If something confirm the anson and the anson stink the diann then it confirm the diann. If something is afebrile and it stink the anson then the anson stink the diann. If something evince the adams and it evince the anson then the anson confirm the diann. The anson does not need the diann.", "logic": "\nConfirm(diann, adams)\nConfirm(diann, anson)\nCuneal(diann)\nAfebrile(diann)\nConfirm(adams, diann)\nAfebrile(adams)\nStink(adams, diann)\nStink(adams, anson)\nEvince(adams, diann)\nEvince(adams, anson)\nAfebrile(anson)\nEvince(anson, diann)\nforall x (Confirm(x, anson) and Stink(anson, diann) -> Confirm(x, diann))\nforall x (Afebrile(x) and Stink(x, anson) -> Stink(anson, diann))\nforall x (Evince(x, adams) and Evince(x, anson) -> Confirm(anson, diann))\n\nnot Stink(anson, diann)\n\nAfebrile(adams) and Stink(adams, anson) and forall x (Afebrile(x) and Stink(x, anson) -> Stink(anson, diann)) -> therefore Stink(anson, diann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The beilul uniformise the siobhan. The beilul uniformise the sharlene. The beilul is smug. The beilul is desiccated. The siobhan uniformise the beilul. The siobhan is desiccated. The siobhan mythicize the beilul. The siobhan mythicize the sharlene. The siobhan transplant the beilul. The siobhan transplant the sharlene. The sharlene is desiccated. The sharlene transplant the beilul. If something uniformise the sharlene and the sharlene mythicize the beilul then it uniformise the beilul. If something is desiccated and it mythicize the sharlene then the sharlene mythicize the beilul. If something transplant the siobhan and it transplant the sharlene then the sharlene uniformise the beilul. The beilul uniformise the beilul.", "logic": "\nUniformise(beilul, siobhan)\nUniformise(beilul, sharlene)\nSmug(beilul)\nDesiccated(beilul)\nUniformise(siobhan, beilul)\nDesiccated(siobhan)\nMythicize(siobhan, beilul)\nMythicize(siobhan, sharlene)\nTransplant(siobhan, beilul)\nTransplant(siobhan, sharlene)\nDesiccated(sharlene)\nTransplant(sharlene, beilul)\nforall x (Uniformise(x, sharlene) and Mythicize(sharlene, beilul) -> Uniformise(x, beilul))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and Mythicize(x, sharlene) -> Mythicize(sharlene, beilul))\nforall x (Transplant(x, siobhan) and Transplant(x, sharlene) -> Uniformise(sharlene, beilul))\n\nUniformise(beilul, beilul)\n\nDesiccated(siobhan) and Mythicize(siobhan, sharlene) and forall x (Desiccated(x) and Mythicize(x, sharlene) -> Mythicize(sharlene, beilul)) -> therefore Mythicize(sharlene, beilul) Uniformise(beilul, sharlene) and Mythicize(sharlene, beilul) and forall x (Uniformise(x, sharlene) and Mythicize(sharlene, beilul) -> Uniformise(x, beilul)) -> therefore Uniformise(beilul, beilul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The marianne inhume the vladimir. The marianne inhume the misti. The marianne is threaded. The marianne is lapsed. The vladimir inhume the marianne. The vladimir is lapsed. The vladimir encourage the marianne. The vladimir encourage the misti. The vladimir lower the marianne. The vladimir lower the misti. The misti is lapsed. The misti lower the marianne. If something inhume the misti and the misti encourage the marianne then it inhume the marianne. If something is lapsed and it encourage the misti then the misti encourage the marianne. If something lower the vladimir and it lower the misti then the misti inhume the marianne. The marianne does not chase the marianne.", "logic": "\nInhume(marianne, vladimir)\nInhume(marianne, misti)\nThreaded(marianne)\nLapsed(marianne)\nInhume(vladimir, marianne)\nLapsed(vladimir)\nEncourage(vladimir, marianne)\nEncourage(vladimir, misti)\nLower(vladimir, marianne)\nLower(vladimir, misti)\nLapsed(misti)\nLower(misti, marianne)\nforall x (Inhume(x, misti) and Encourage(misti, marianne) -> Inhume(x, marianne))\nforall x (Lapsed(x) and Encourage(x, misti) -> Encourage(misti, marianne))\nforall x (Lower(x, vladimir) and Lower(x, misti) -> Inhume(misti, marianne))\n\nnot Inhume(marianne, marianne)\n\nLapsed(vladimir) and Encourage(vladimir, misti) and forall x (Lapsed(x) and Encourage(x, misti) -> Encourage(misti, marianne)) -> therefore Encourage(misti, marianne) Inhume(marianne, misti) and Encourage(misti, marianne) and forall x (Inhume(x, misti) and Encourage(misti, marianne) -> Inhume(x, marianne)) -> therefore Inhume(marianne, marianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The maxwell peel the allissa. The maxwell peel the tracee. The maxwell is rested. The maxwell is workaday. The allissa peel the maxwell. The allissa is workaday. The allissa botanize the maxwell. The allissa botanize the tracee. The allissa enchain the maxwell. The allissa enchain the tracee. The tracee is workaday. The tracee enchain the maxwell. If something peel the tracee and the tracee botanize the maxwell then it peel the maxwell. If something is workaday and it botanize the tracee then the tracee botanize the maxwell. If something enchain the allissa and it enchain the tracee then the tracee peel the maxwell. The tracee does not chase the maxwell.", "logic": "\nPeel(maxwell, allissa)\nPeel(maxwell, tracee)\nRested(maxwell)\nWorkaday(maxwell)\nPeel(allissa, maxwell)\nWorkaday(allissa)\nBotanize(allissa, maxwell)\nBotanize(allissa, tracee)\nEnchain(allissa, maxwell)\nEnchain(allissa, tracee)\nWorkaday(tracee)\nEnchain(tracee, maxwell)\nforall x (Peel(x, tracee) and Botanize(tracee, maxwell) -> Peel(x, maxwell))\nforall x (Workaday(x) and Botanize(x, tracee) -> Botanize(tracee, maxwell))\nforall x (Enchain(x, allissa) and Enchain(x, tracee) -> Peel(tracee, maxwell))\n\nnot Peel(tracee, maxwell)\n\nforall x (Peel(x, tracee) and Botanize(tracee, maxwell) -> Peel(x, maxwell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The sholom endeavor the hakeem. The sholom endeavor the jaclin. The sholom is reliable. The sholom is bespoken. The hakeem endeavor the sholom. The hakeem is bespoken. The hakeem flunk the sholom. The hakeem flunk the jaclin. The hakeem care the sholom. The hakeem care the jaclin. The jaclin is bespoken. The jaclin care the sholom. If something endeavor the jaclin and the jaclin flunk the sholom then it endeavor the sholom. If something is bespoken and it flunk the jaclin then the jaclin flunk the sholom. If something care the hakeem and it care the jaclin then the jaclin endeavor the sholom. The jaclin is green.", "logic": "\nEndeavor(sholom, hakeem)\nEndeavor(sholom, jaclin)\nReliable(sholom)\nBespoken(sholom)\nEndeavor(hakeem, sholom)\nBespoken(hakeem)\nFlunk(hakeem, sholom)\nFlunk(hakeem, jaclin)\nCare(hakeem, sholom)\nCare(hakeem, jaclin)\nBespoken(jaclin)\nCare(jaclin, sholom)\nforall x (Endeavor(x, jaclin) and Flunk(jaclin, sholom) -> Endeavor(x, sholom))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) and Flunk(x, jaclin) -> Flunk(jaclin, sholom))\nforall x (Care(x, hakeem) and Care(x, jaclin) -> Endeavor(jaclin, sholom))\n\nGreen(jaclin)\n\nGreen(jaclin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The winthrop girth the harlin. The winthrop girth the magna. The winthrop is nonslip. The winthrop is fledgling. The harlin girth the winthrop. The harlin is fledgling. The harlin prettify the winthrop. The harlin prettify the magna. The harlin placard the winthrop. The harlin placard the magna. The magna is fledgling. The magna placard the winthrop. If something girth the magna and the magna prettify the winthrop then it girth the winthrop. If something is fledgling and it prettify the magna then the magna prettify the winthrop. If something placard the harlin and it placard the magna then the magna girth the winthrop. The winthrop does not need the winthrop.", "logic": "\nGirth(winthrop, harlin)\nGirth(winthrop, magna)\nNonslip(winthrop)\nFledgling(winthrop)\nGirth(harlin, winthrop)\nFledgling(harlin)\nPrettify(harlin, winthrop)\nPrettify(harlin, magna)\nPlacard(harlin, winthrop)\nPlacard(harlin, magna)\nFledgling(magna)\nPlacard(magna, winthrop)\nforall x (Girth(x, magna) and Prettify(magna, winthrop) -> Girth(x, winthrop))\nforall x (Fledgling(x) and Prettify(x, magna) -> Prettify(magna, winthrop))\nforall x (Placard(x, harlin) and Placard(x, magna) -> Girth(magna, winthrop))\n\nnot Prettify(winthrop, winthrop)\n\nnot Prettify(winthrop, winthrop) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The selma categorise the robena. The selma categorise the roseanna. The selma is hyoid. The selma is bedraggled. The robena categorise the selma. The robena is bedraggled. The robena gate the selma. The robena gate the roseanna. The robena sclaff the selma. The robena sclaff the roseanna. The roseanna is bedraggled. The roseanna sclaff the selma. If something categorise the roseanna and the roseanna gate the selma then it categorise the selma. If something is bedraggled and it gate the roseanna then the roseanna gate the selma. If something sclaff the robena and it sclaff the roseanna then the roseanna categorise the selma. The robena is rough.", "logic": "\nCategorise(selma, robena)\nCategorise(selma, roseanna)\nHyoid(selma)\nBedraggled(selma)\nCategorise(robena, selma)\nBedraggled(robena)\nGate(robena, selma)\nGate(robena, roseanna)\nSclaff(robena, selma)\nSclaff(robena, roseanna)\nBedraggled(roseanna)\nSclaff(roseanna, selma)\nforall x (Categorise(x, roseanna) and Gate(roseanna, selma) -> Categorise(x, selma))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Gate(x, roseanna) -> Gate(roseanna, selma))\nforall x (Sclaff(x, robena) and Sclaff(x, roseanna) -> Categorise(roseanna, selma))\n\nRough(robena)\n\nRough(robena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The roxine systemize the jerzy. The roxine systemize the churchill. The roxine is unarguable. The roxine is fascistic. The jerzy systemize the roxine. The jerzy is fascistic. The jerzy edit the roxine. The jerzy edit the churchill. The jerzy refer the roxine. The jerzy refer the churchill. The churchill is fascistic. The churchill refer the roxine. If something systemize the churchill and the churchill edit the roxine then it systemize the roxine. If something is fascistic and it edit the churchill then the churchill edit the roxine. If something refer the jerzy and it refer the churchill then the churchill systemize the roxine. The jerzy is not green.", "logic": "\nSystemize(roxine, jerzy)\nSystemize(roxine, churchill)\nUnarguable(roxine)\nFascistic(roxine)\nSystemize(jerzy, roxine)\nFascistic(jerzy)\nEdit(jerzy, roxine)\nEdit(jerzy, churchill)\nRefer(jerzy, roxine)\nRefer(jerzy, churchill)\nFascistic(churchill)\nRefer(churchill, roxine)\nforall x (Systemize(x, churchill) and Edit(churchill, roxine) -> Systemize(x, roxine))\nforall x (Fascistic(x) and Edit(x, churchill) -> Edit(churchill, roxine))\nforall x (Refer(x, jerzy) and Refer(x, churchill) -> Systemize(churchill, roxine))\n\nnot Green(jerzy)\n\nnot Green(jerzy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "The mickie billow the glenn. The mickie billow the thedrick. The mickie is hairlike. The mickie is baronial. The glenn billow the mickie. The glenn is baronial. The glenn vault the mickie. The glenn vault the thedrick. The glenn browse the mickie. The glenn browse the thedrick. The thedrick is baronial. The thedrick browse the mickie. If something billow the thedrick and the thedrick vault the mickie then it billow the mickie. If something is baronial and it vault the thedrick then the thedrick vault the mickie. If something browse the glenn and it browse the thedrick then the thedrick billow the mickie. The thedrick is cold.", "logic": "\nBillow(mickie, glenn)\nBillow(mickie, thedrick)\nHairlike(mickie)\nBaronial(mickie)\nBillow(glenn, mickie)\nBaronial(glenn)\nVault(glenn, mickie)\nVault(glenn, thedrick)\nBrowse(glenn, mickie)\nBrowse(glenn, thedrick)\nBaronial(thedrick)\nBrowse(thedrick, mickie)\nforall x (Billow(x, thedrick) and Vault(thedrick, mickie) -> Billow(x, mickie))\nforall x (Baronial(x) and Vault(x, thedrick) -> Vault(thedrick, mickie))\nforall x (Browse(x, glenn) and Browse(x, thedrick) -> Billow(thedrick, mickie))\n\nCold(thedrick)\n\nCold(thedrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1481"} {"premises": "Jenica is harsh. Jenica is bewitched. Jenica is downbound. Jenica is bearish. Frank is harsh. Frank is downbound. Frank is bearish. Iago is not harsh. Iago is bewitched. Iago is latter. All bewitched, latter things are downbound. If something is downbound then it is not acquired. Jenica is harsh.", "logic": "\nHarsh(jenica)\nBewitched(jenica)\nDownbound(jenica)\nBearish(jenica)\nHarsh(frank)\nDownbound(frank)\nBearish(frank)\nnot Harsh(iago)\nBewitched(iago)\nLatter(iago)\nforall x (Bewitched(x) and Latter(x) -> Downbound(x))\nforall x (Downbound(x) -> not Acquired(x))\n\nHarsh(jenica)\n\ntherefore Harsh(jenica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Kurt is held. Kurt is sclerotic. Kurt is thick. Kurt is valent. Deana is held. Deana is thick. Deana is valent. Harriette is not held. Harriette is sclerotic. Harriette is fevered. All sclerotic, fevered things are thick. If something is thick then it is not accessary. Deana is not thick.", "logic": "\nHeld(kurt)\nSclerotic(kurt)\nThick(kurt)\nValent(kurt)\nHeld(deana)\nThick(deana)\nValent(deana)\nnot Held(harriette)\nSclerotic(harriette)\nFevered(harriette)\nforall x (Sclerotic(x) and Fevered(x) -> Thick(x))\nforall x (Thick(x) -> not Accessary(x))\n\nnot Thick(deana)\n\ntherefore Thick(deana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Essa is looking. Essa is symmetric. Essa is unsworn. Essa is imprudent. Pail is looking. Pail is unsworn. Pail is imprudent. Fianna is not looking. Fianna is symmetric. Fianna is stringent. All symmetric, stringent things are unsworn. If something is unsworn then it is not strung. Fianna is unsworn.", "logic": "\nLooking(essa)\nSymmetric(essa)\nUnsworn(essa)\nImprudent(essa)\nLooking(pail)\nUnsworn(pail)\nImprudent(pail)\nnot Looking(fianna)\nSymmetric(fianna)\nStringent(fianna)\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and Stringent(x) -> Unsworn(x))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) -> not Strung(x))\n\nUnsworn(fianna)\n\nSymmetric(fianna) and Stringent(fianna) and forall x (Symmetric(x) and Stringent(x) -> Unsworn(x)) -> therefore Unsworn(fianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Kandace is unshod. Kandace is focussed. Kandace is ordinary. Kandace is parasitic. Mozelle is unshod. Mozelle is ordinary. Mozelle is parasitic. Mela is not unshod. Mela is focussed. Mela is ulcerated. All focussed, ulcerated things are ordinary. If something is ordinary then it is not unsoiled. Kandace is unsoiled.", "logic": "\nUnshod(kandace)\nFocussed(kandace)\nOrdinary(kandace)\nParasitic(kandace)\nUnshod(mozelle)\nOrdinary(mozelle)\nParasitic(mozelle)\nnot Unshod(mela)\nFocussed(mela)\nUlcerated(mela)\nforall x (Focussed(x) and Ulcerated(x) -> Ordinary(x))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> not Unsoiled(x))\n\nUnsoiled(kandace)\n\nOrdinary(kandace) and forall x (Ordinary(x) -> not Unsoiled(x)) -> therefore not Unsoiled(kandace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Blythe is micropylar. Blythe is intangible. Blythe is refractory. Blythe is vicious. Meg is micropylar. Meg is refractory. Meg is vicious. Dorie is not micropylar. Dorie is intangible. Dorie is consultive. All intangible, consultive things are refractory. If something is refractory then it is not delphic. Dorie is not delphic.", "logic": "\nMicropylar(blythe)\nIntangible(blythe)\nRefractory(blythe)\nVicious(blythe)\nMicropylar(meg)\nRefractory(meg)\nVicious(meg)\nnot Micropylar(dorie)\nIntangible(dorie)\nConsultive(dorie)\nforall x (Intangible(x) and Consultive(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Refractory(x) -> not Delphic(x))\n\nnot Delphic(dorie)\n\nIntangible(dorie) and Consultive(dorie) and forall x (Intangible(x) and Consultive(x) -> Refractory(x)) -> therefore Refractory(dorie) Refractory(dorie) and forall x (Refractory(x) -> not Delphic(x)) -> therefore not Delphic(dorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Witold is farseeing. Witold is exalted. Witold is increasing. Witold is curving. Amie is farseeing. Amie is increasing. Amie is curving. Joyous is not farseeing. Joyous is exalted. Joyous is relative. All exalted, relative things are increasing. If something is increasing then it is not untroubled. Joyous is untroubled.", "logic": "\nFarseeing(witold)\nExalted(witold)\nIncreasing(witold)\nCurving(witold)\nFarseeing(amie)\nIncreasing(amie)\nCurving(amie)\nnot Farseeing(joyous)\nExalted(joyous)\nRelative(joyous)\nforall x (Exalted(x) and Relative(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) -> not Untroubled(x))\n\nUntroubled(joyous)\n\nExalted(joyous) and Relative(joyous) and forall x (Exalted(x) and Relative(x) -> Increasing(x)) -> therefore Increasing(joyous) Increasing(joyous) and forall x (Increasing(x) -> not Untroubled(x)) -> therefore not Untroubled(joyous)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Marylou is fleecy. Marylou is mensurable. Marylou is gilled. Marylou is exiguous. Sophi is fleecy. Sophi is gilled. Sophi is exiguous. Gwenny is not fleecy. Gwenny is mensurable. Gwenny is homy. All mensurable, homy things are gilled. If something is gilled then it is not smutty. Marylou is not homy.", "logic": "\nFleecy(marylou)\nMensurable(marylou)\nGilled(marylou)\nExiguous(marylou)\nFleecy(sophi)\nGilled(sophi)\nExiguous(sophi)\nnot Fleecy(gwenny)\nMensurable(gwenny)\nHomy(gwenny)\nforall x (Mensurable(x) and Homy(x) -> Gilled(x))\nforall x (Gilled(x) -> not Smutty(x))\n\nnot Homy(marylou)\n\nnot Homy(marylou) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Torey is greasy. Torey is amoristic. Torey is perfected. Torey is sheathed. Moore is greasy. Moore is perfected. Moore is sheathed. Valry is not greasy. Valry is amoristic. Valry is fraudulent. All amoristic, fraudulent things are perfected. If something is perfected then it is not macaronic. Valry is round.", "logic": "\nGreasy(torey)\nAmoristic(torey)\nPerfected(torey)\nSheathed(torey)\nGreasy(moore)\nPerfected(moore)\nSheathed(moore)\nnot Greasy(valry)\nAmoristic(valry)\nFraudulent(valry)\nforall x (Amoristic(x) and Fraudulent(x) -> Perfected(x))\nforall x (Perfected(x) -> not Macaronic(x))\n\nRound(valry)\n\nRound(valry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Joslyn is tribal. Joslyn is edible. Joslyn is belittling. Joslyn is dwarfish. Cathlene is tribal. Cathlene is belittling. Cathlene is dwarfish. Margarita is not tribal. Margarita is edible. Margarita is allergic. All edible, allergic things are belittling. If something is belittling then it is not leftish. Cathlene is not edible.", "logic": "\nTribal(joslyn)\nEdible(joslyn)\nBelittling(joslyn)\nDwarfish(joslyn)\nTribal(cathlene)\nBelittling(cathlene)\nDwarfish(cathlene)\nnot Tribal(margarita)\nEdible(margarita)\nAllergic(margarita)\nforall x (Edible(x) and Allergic(x) -> Belittling(x))\nforall x (Belittling(x) -> not Leftish(x))\n\nnot Edible(cathlene)\n\nnot Edible(cathlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Sapphire is noble. Sapphire is liquid. Sapphire is unbrushed. Sapphire is pyrrhic. Lenny is noble. Lenny is unbrushed. Lenny is pyrrhic. Noach is not noble. Noach is liquid. Noach is vocational. All liquid, vocational things are unbrushed. If something is unbrushed then it is not unfocused. Noach is pyrrhic.", "logic": "\nNoble(sapphire)\nLiquid(sapphire)\nUnbrushed(sapphire)\nPyrrhic(sapphire)\nNoble(lenny)\nUnbrushed(lenny)\nPyrrhic(lenny)\nnot Noble(noach)\nLiquid(noach)\nVocational(noach)\nforall x (Liquid(x) and Vocational(x) -> Unbrushed(x))\nforall x (Unbrushed(x) -> not Unfocused(x))\n\nPyrrhic(noach)\n\nPyrrhic(noach) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Yehudi is unveiled. Yehudi is reproving. Yehudi is modeled. Yehudi is pronominal. Yacov is unveiled. Yacov is modeled. Yacov is pronominal. Scottie is not unveiled. Scottie is reproving. Scottie is undesired. All reproving, undesired things are modeled. If something is modeled then it is not euphonious. Yacov is not round.", "logic": "\nUnveiled(yehudi)\nReproving(yehudi)\nModeled(yehudi)\nPronominal(yehudi)\nUnveiled(yacov)\nModeled(yacov)\nPronominal(yacov)\nnot Unveiled(scottie)\nReproving(scottie)\nUndesired(scottie)\nforall x (Reproving(x) and Undesired(x) -> Modeled(x))\nforall x (Modeled(x) -> not Euphonious(x))\n\nnot Round(yacov)\n\nnot Round(yacov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "Phaedra is bearable. Phaedra is untraveled. Phaedra is unremedied. Phaedra is slangy. Jorry is bearable. Jorry is unremedied. Jorry is slangy. Mira is not bearable. Mira is untraveled. Mira is bacteroid. All untraveled, bacteroid things are unremedied. If something is unremedied then it is not plucked. Jorry is bacteroid.", "logic": "\nBearable(phaedra)\nUntraveled(phaedra)\nUnremedied(phaedra)\nSlangy(phaedra)\nBearable(jorry)\nUnremedied(jorry)\nSlangy(jorry)\nnot Bearable(mira)\nUntraveled(mira)\nBacteroid(mira)\nforall x (Untraveled(x) and Bacteroid(x) -> Unremedied(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) -> not Plucked(x))\n\nBacteroid(jorry)\n\nBacteroid(jorry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-404"} {"premises": "The see is darling. The see is tumescent. The see is pedate. The see husk the roxi. The see husk the bobbi. The see manifold the roxi. The see manifold the bobbi. The see meter the bobbi. The roxi husk the bobbi. The roxi meter the see. The bobbi is stately. The bobbi is darling. The bobbi is tumescent. The bobbi is pedate. The bobbi husk the roxi. The bobbi manifold the see. If the bobbi husk the see then the bobbi manifold the roxi. If something is pedate then it husk the see. If something meter the bobbi then it manifold the see. The bobbi is pedate.", "logic": "\nDarling(see)\nTumescent(see)\nPedate(see)\nHusk(see, roxi)\nHusk(see, bobbi)\nManifold(see, roxi)\nManifold(see, bobbi)\nMeter(see, bobbi)\nHusk(roxi, bobbi)\nMeter(roxi, see)\nStately(bobbi)\nDarling(bobbi)\nTumescent(bobbi)\nPedate(bobbi)\nHusk(bobbi, roxi)\nManifold(bobbi, see)\nHusk(bobbi, see) -> Manifold(bobbi, roxi)\nforall x (Pedate(x) -> Husk(x, see))\nforall x (Meter(x, bobbi) -> Manifold(x, see))\n\nPedate(bobbi)\n\ntherefore Pedate(bobbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The markus is evident. The markus is photogenic. The markus is mongolian. The markus brake the ginny. The markus brake the onida. The markus romanise the ginny. The markus romanise the onida. The markus handicap the onida. The ginny brake the onida. The ginny handicap the markus. The onida is reversive. The onida is evident. The onida is photogenic. The onida is mongolian. The onida brake the ginny. The onida romanise the markus. If the onida brake the markus then the onida romanise the ginny. If something is mongolian then it brake the markus. If something handicap the onida then it romanise the markus. The onida is not evident.", "logic": "\nEvident(markus)\nPhotogenic(markus)\nMongolian(markus)\nBrake(markus, ginny)\nBrake(markus, onida)\nRomanise(markus, ginny)\nRomanise(markus, onida)\nHandicap(markus, onida)\nBrake(ginny, onida)\nHandicap(ginny, markus)\nReversive(onida)\nEvident(onida)\nPhotogenic(onida)\nMongolian(onida)\nBrake(onida, ginny)\nRomanise(onida, markus)\nBrake(onida, markus) -> Romanise(onida, ginny)\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Brake(x, markus))\nforall x (Handicap(x, onida) -> Romanise(x, markus))\n\nnot Evident(onida)\n\ntherefore Evident(onida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The haskell is lunate. The haskell is inchoative. The haskell is crabwise. The haskell beleaguer the amadeus. The haskell beleaguer the elwyn. The haskell canvas the amadeus. The haskell canvas the elwyn. The haskell patrol the elwyn. The amadeus beleaguer the elwyn. The amadeus patrol the haskell. The elwyn is drained. The elwyn is lunate. The elwyn is inchoative. The elwyn is crabwise. The elwyn beleaguer the amadeus. The elwyn canvas the haskell. If the elwyn beleaguer the haskell then the elwyn canvas the amadeus. If something is crabwise then it beleaguer the haskell. If something patrol the elwyn then it canvas the haskell. The haskell beleaguer the haskell.", "logic": "\nLunate(haskell)\nInchoative(haskell)\nCrabwise(haskell)\nBeleaguer(haskell, amadeus)\nBeleaguer(haskell, elwyn)\nCanvas(haskell, amadeus)\nCanvas(haskell, elwyn)\nPatrol(haskell, elwyn)\nBeleaguer(amadeus, elwyn)\nPatrol(amadeus, haskell)\nDrained(elwyn)\nLunate(elwyn)\nInchoative(elwyn)\nCrabwise(elwyn)\nBeleaguer(elwyn, amadeus)\nCanvas(elwyn, haskell)\nBeleaguer(elwyn, haskell) -> Canvas(elwyn, amadeus)\nforall x (Crabwise(x) -> Beleaguer(x, haskell))\nforall x (Patrol(x, elwyn) -> Canvas(x, haskell))\n\nBeleaguer(haskell, haskell)\n\nCrabwise(haskell) and forall x (Crabwise(x) -> Beleaguer(x, haskell)) -> therefore Beleaguer(haskell, haskell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The armando is twee. The armando is joyous. The armando is impious. The armando purse the quintana. The armando purse the kent. The armando stray the quintana. The armando stray the kent. The armando obturate the kent. The quintana purse the kent. The quintana obturate the armando. The kent is baric. The kent is twee. The kent is joyous. The kent is impious. The kent purse the quintana. The kent stray the armando. If the kent purse the armando then the kent stray the quintana. If something is impious then it purse the armando. If something obturate the kent then it stray the armando. The kent does not like the armando.", "logic": "\nTwee(armando)\nJoyous(armando)\nImpious(armando)\nPurse(armando, quintana)\nPurse(armando, kent)\nStray(armando, quintana)\nStray(armando, kent)\nObturate(armando, kent)\nPurse(quintana, kent)\nObturate(quintana, armando)\nBaric(kent)\nTwee(kent)\nJoyous(kent)\nImpious(kent)\nPurse(kent, quintana)\nStray(kent, armando)\nPurse(kent, armando) -> Stray(kent, quintana)\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Purse(x, armando))\nforall x (Obturate(x, kent) -> Stray(x, armando))\n\nnot Purse(kent, armando)\n\nImpious(kent) and forall x (Impious(x) -> Purse(x, armando)) -> therefore Purse(kent, armando)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The ciel is diagonal. The ciel is boring. The ciel is textual. The ciel stampede the marice. The ciel stampede the hilliard. The ciel tussle the marice. The ciel tussle the hilliard. The ciel fuss the hilliard. The marice stampede the hilliard. The marice fuss the ciel. The hilliard is quilted. The hilliard is diagonal. The hilliard is boring. The hilliard is textual. The hilliard stampede the marice. The hilliard tussle the ciel. If the hilliard stampede the ciel then the hilliard tussle the marice. If something is textual then it stampede the ciel. If something fuss the hilliard then it tussle the ciel. The hilliard tussle the marice.", "logic": "\nDiagonal(ciel)\nBoring(ciel)\nTextual(ciel)\nStampede(ciel, marice)\nStampede(ciel, hilliard)\nTussle(ciel, marice)\nTussle(ciel, hilliard)\nFuss(ciel, hilliard)\nStampede(marice, hilliard)\nFuss(marice, ciel)\nQuilted(hilliard)\nDiagonal(hilliard)\nBoring(hilliard)\nTextual(hilliard)\nStampede(hilliard, marice)\nTussle(hilliard, ciel)\nStampede(hilliard, ciel) -> Tussle(hilliard, marice)\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Stampede(x, ciel))\nforall x (Fuss(x, hilliard) -> Tussle(x, ciel))\n\nTussle(hilliard, marice)\n\nTextual(hilliard) and forall x (Textual(x) -> Stampede(x, ciel)) -> therefore Stampede(hilliard, ciel) Stampede(hilliard, ciel) and Stampede(hilliard, ciel) -> Tussle(hilliard, marice) -> therefore Tussle(hilliard, marice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The john is spanish. The john is datable. The john is coexistent. The john encourage the philis. The john encourage the pauletta. The john remind the philis. The john remind the pauletta. The john whore the pauletta. The philis encourage the pauletta. The philis whore the john. The pauletta is totalistic. The pauletta is spanish. The pauletta is datable. The pauletta is coexistent. The pauletta encourage the philis. The pauletta remind the john. If the pauletta encourage the john then the pauletta remind the philis. If something is coexistent then it encourage the john. If something whore the pauletta then it remind the john. The pauletta does not need the philis.", "logic": "\nSpanish(john)\nDatable(john)\nCoexistent(john)\nEncourage(john, philis)\nEncourage(john, pauletta)\nRemind(john, philis)\nRemind(john, pauletta)\nWhore(john, pauletta)\nEncourage(philis, pauletta)\nWhore(philis, john)\nTotalistic(pauletta)\nSpanish(pauletta)\nDatable(pauletta)\nCoexistent(pauletta)\nEncourage(pauletta, philis)\nRemind(pauletta, john)\nEncourage(pauletta, john) -> Remind(pauletta, philis)\nforall x (Coexistent(x) -> Encourage(x, john))\nforall x (Whore(x, pauletta) -> Remind(x, john))\n\nnot Remind(pauletta, philis)\n\nCoexistent(pauletta) and forall x (Coexistent(x) -> Encourage(x, john)) -> therefore Encourage(pauletta, john) Encourage(pauletta, john) and Encourage(pauletta, john) -> Remind(pauletta, philis) -> therefore Remind(pauletta, philis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The gino is cantonal. The gino is lumpy. The gino is beamy. The gino commove the judie. The gino commove the socrates. The gino leapfrog the judie. The gino leapfrog the socrates. The gino lysogenize the socrates. The judie commove the socrates. The judie lysogenize the gino. The socrates is harmonious. The socrates is cantonal. The socrates is lumpy. The socrates is beamy. The socrates commove the judie. The socrates leapfrog the gino. If the socrates commove the gino then the socrates leapfrog the judie. If something is beamy then it commove the gino. If something lysogenize the socrates then it leapfrog the gino. The judie does not like the gino.", "logic": "\nCantonal(gino)\nLumpy(gino)\nBeamy(gino)\nCommove(gino, judie)\nCommove(gino, socrates)\nLeapfrog(gino, judie)\nLeapfrog(gino, socrates)\nLysogenize(gino, socrates)\nCommove(judie, socrates)\nLysogenize(judie, gino)\nHarmonious(socrates)\nCantonal(socrates)\nLumpy(socrates)\nBeamy(socrates)\nCommove(socrates, judie)\nLeapfrog(socrates, gino)\nCommove(socrates, gino) -> Leapfrog(socrates, judie)\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Commove(x, gino))\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, socrates) -> Leapfrog(x, gino))\n\nnot Commove(judie, gino)\n\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Commove(x, gino)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The claudine is disabling. The claudine is shattering. The claudine is mastered. The claudine turn the jesus. The claudine turn the maxi. The claudine skreigh the jesus. The claudine skreigh the maxi. The claudine unwire the maxi. The jesus turn the maxi. The jesus unwire the claudine. The maxi is glycogenic. The maxi is disabling. The maxi is shattering. The maxi is mastered. The maxi turn the jesus. The maxi skreigh the claudine. If the maxi turn the claudine then the maxi skreigh the jesus. If something is mastered then it turn the claudine. If something unwire the maxi then it skreigh the claudine. The jesus skreigh the claudine.", "logic": "\nDisabling(claudine)\nShattering(claudine)\nMastered(claudine)\nTurn(claudine, jesus)\nTurn(claudine, maxi)\nSkreigh(claudine, jesus)\nSkreigh(claudine, maxi)\nUnwire(claudine, maxi)\nTurn(jesus, maxi)\nUnwire(jesus, claudine)\nGlycogenic(maxi)\nDisabling(maxi)\nShattering(maxi)\nMastered(maxi)\nTurn(maxi, jesus)\nSkreigh(maxi, claudine)\nTurn(maxi, claudine) -> Skreigh(maxi, jesus)\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Turn(x, claudine))\nforall x (Unwire(x, maxi) -> Skreigh(x, claudine))\n\nSkreigh(jesus, claudine)\n\nforall x (Unwire(x, maxi) -> Skreigh(x, claudine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The ruthie is lobar. The ruthie is dated. The ruthie is thenal. The ruthie pauperise the rabi. The ruthie pauperise the hans. The ruthie shoehorn the rabi. The ruthie shoehorn the hans. The ruthie contravene the hans. The rabi pauperise the hans. The rabi contravene the ruthie. The hans is dropping. The hans is lobar. The hans is dated. The hans is thenal. The hans pauperise the rabi. The hans shoehorn the ruthie. If the hans pauperise the ruthie then the hans shoehorn the rabi. If something is thenal then it pauperise the ruthie. If something contravene the hans then it shoehorn the ruthie. The rabi does not need the hans.", "logic": "\nLobar(ruthie)\nDated(ruthie)\nThenal(ruthie)\nPauperise(ruthie, rabi)\nPauperise(ruthie, hans)\nShoehorn(ruthie, rabi)\nShoehorn(ruthie, hans)\nContravene(ruthie, hans)\nPauperise(rabi, hans)\nContravene(rabi, ruthie)\nDropping(hans)\nLobar(hans)\nDated(hans)\nThenal(hans)\nPauperise(hans, rabi)\nShoehorn(hans, ruthie)\nPauperise(hans, ruthie) -> Shoehorn(hans, rabi)\nforall x (Thenal(x) -> Pauperise(x, ruthie))\nforall x (Contravene(x, hans) -> Shoehorn(x, ruthie))\n\nnot Shoehorn(rabi, hans)\n\nnot Shoehorn(rabi, hans) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The bailie is ferny. The bailie is singable. The bailie is cinematic. The bailie initialize the stephana. The bailie initialize the napoleon. The bailie winnow the stephana. The bailie winnow the napoleon. The bailie admonish the napoleon. The stephana initialize the napoleon. The stephana admonish the bailie. The napoleon is endoergic. The napoleon is ferny. The napoleon is singable. The napoleon is cinematic. The napoleon initialize the stephana. The napoleon winnow the bailie. If the napoleon initialize the bailie then the napoleon winnow the stephana. If something is cinematic then it initialize the bailie. If something admonish the napoleon then it winnow the bailie. The stephana is ferny.", "logic": "\nFerny(bailie)\nSingable(bailie)\nCinematic(bailie)\nInitialize(bailie, stephana)\nInitialize(bailie, napoleon)\nWinnow(bailie, stephana)\nWinnow(bailie, napoleon)\nAdmonish(bailie, napoleon)\nInitialize(stephana, napoleon)\nAdmonish(stephana, bailie)\nEndoergic(napoleon)\nFerny(napoleon)\nSingable(napoleon)\nCinematic(napoleon)\nInitialize(napoleon, stephana)\nWinnow(napoleon, bailie)\nInitialize(napoleon, bailie) -> Winnow(napoleon, stephana)\nforall x (Cinematic(x) -> Initialize(x, bailie))\nforall x (Admonish(x, napoleon) -> Winnow(x, bailie))\n\nFerny(stephana)\n\nFerny(stephana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The lev is creative. The lev is suffering. The lev is vagal. The lev excoriate the adrienne. The lev excoriate the marcia. The lev narrow the adrienne. The lev narrow the marcia. The lev licence the marcia. The adrienne excoriate the marcia. The adrienne licence the lev. The marcia is witty. The marcia is creative. The marcia is suffering. The marcia is vagal. The marcia excoriate the adrienne. The marcia narrow the lev. If the marcia excoriate the lev then the marcia narrow the adrienne. If something is vagal then it excoriate the lev. If something licence the marcia then it narrow the lev. The adrienne does not like the adrienne.", "logic": "\nCreative(lev)\nSuffering(lev)\nVagal(lev)\nExcoriate(lev, adrienne)\nExcoriate(lev, marcia)\nNarrow(lev, adrienne)\nNarrow(lev, marcia)\nLicence(lev, marcia)\nExcoriate(adrienne, marcia)\nLicence(adrienne, lev)\nWitty(marcia)\nCreative(marcia)\nSuffering(marcia)\nVagal(marcia)\nExcoriate(marcia, adrienne)\nNarrow(marcia, lev)\nExcoriate(marcia, lev) -> Narrow(marcia, adrienne)\nforall x (Vagal(x) -> Excoriate(x, lev))\nforall x (Licence(x, marcia) -> Narrow(x, lev))\n\nnot Excoriate(adrienne, adrienne)\n\nnot Excoriate(adrienne, adrienne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "The ruddy is italian. The ruddy is pained. The ruddy is patronized. The ruddy underpay the robin. The ruddy underpay the goddart. The ruddy energize the robin. The ruddy energize the goddart. The ruddy stopper the goddart. The robin underpay the goddart. The robin stopper the ruddy. The goddart is maddening. The goddart is italian. The goddart is pained. The goddart is patronized. The goddart underpay the robin. The goddart energize the ruddy. If the goddart underpay the ruddy then the goddart energize the robin. If something is patronized then it underpay the ruddy. If something stopper the goddart then it energize the ruddy. The goddart stopper the robin.", "logic": "\nItalian(ruddy)\nPained(ruddy)\nPatronized(ruddy)\nUnderpay(ruddy, robin)\nUnderpay(ruddy, goddart)\nEnergize(ruddy, robin)\nEnergize(ruddy, goddart)\nStopper(ruddy, goddart)\nUnderpay(robin, goddart)\nStopper(robin, ruddy)\nMaddening(goddart)\nItalian(goddart)\nPained(goddart)\nPatronized(goddart)\nUnderpay(goddart, robin)\nEnergize(goddart, ruddy)\nUnderpay(goddart, ruddy) -> Energize(goddart, robin)\nforall x (Patronized(x) -> Underpay(x, ruddy))\nforall x (Stopper(x, goddart) -> Energize(x, ruddy))\n\nStopper(goddart, robin)\n\nStopper(goddart, robin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1641"} {"premises": "Crawford is uncomely. If someone is uncomely then they are single. If someone is shambolic and hyperopic then they are worsened. Smart, hyperopic people are uncomely. If Crawford is hyperopic and Crawford is single then Crawford is worsened. Cold people are hyperopic. White people are unoriented. Crawford is uncomely.", "logic": "\nUncomely(crawford)\nforall x (Uncomely(x) -> Single(x))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Hyperopic(x) -> Worsened(x))\nforall x (Subaltern(x) and Hyperopic(x) -> Uncomely(x))\nHyperopic(crawford) and Single(crawford) -> Worsened(crawford)\nforall x (Single(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Worsened(x) -> Unoriented(x))\n\nUncomely(crawford)\n\ntherefore Uncomely(crawford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "Belita is colourless. If someone is colourless then they are trinuclear. If someone is incredible and distant then they are biloculate. Smart, distant people are colourless. If Belita is distant and Belita is trinuclear then Belita is biloculate. Cold people are distant. White people are breeding. Belita is not colourless.", "logic": "\nColourless(belita)\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Trinuclear(x))\nforall x (Incredible(x) and Distant(x) -> Biloculate(x))\nforall x (Hittite(x) and Distant(x) -> Colourless(x))\nDistant(belita) and Trinuclear(belita) -> Biloculate(belita)\nforall x (Trinuclear(x) -> Distant(x))\nforall x (Biloculate(x) -> Breeding(x))\n\nnot Colourless(belita)\n\ntherefore Colourless(belita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "Lizzy is gritty. If someone is gritty then they are bursal. If someone is estranging and hesitating then they are berried. Smart, hesitating people are gritty. If Lizzy is hesitating and Lizzy is bursal then Lizzy is berried. Cold people are hesitating. White people are goddamn. Lizzy is bursal.", "logic": "\nGritty(lizzy)\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Estranging(x) and Hesitating(x) -> Berried(x))\nforall x (Monastic(x) and Hesitating(x) -> Gritty(x))\nHesitating(lizzy) and Bursal(lizzy) -> Berried(lizzy)\nforall x (Bursal(x) -> Hesitating(x))\nforall x (Berried(x) -> Goddamn(x))\n\nBursal(lizzy)\n\nGritty(lizzy) and forall x (Gritty(x) -> Bursal(x)) -> therefore Bursal(lizzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "Jerrylee is asthenic. If someone is asthenic then they are foldable. If someone is allergic and variform then they are unpaid. Smart, variform people are asthenic. If Jerrylee is variform and Jerrylee is foldable then Jerrylee is unpaid. Cold people are variform. White people are albinotic. Jerrylee is not foldable.", "logic": "\nAsthenic(jerrylee)\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Foldable(x))\nforall x (Allergic(x) and Variform(x) -> Unpaid(x))\nforall x (Screwball(x) and Variform(x) -> Asthenic(x))\nVariform(jerrylee) and Foldable(jerrylee) -> Unpaid(jerrylee)\nforall x (Foldable(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Unpaid(x) -> Albinotic(x))\n\nnot Foldable(jerrylee)\n\nAsthenic(jerrylee) and forall x (Asthenic(x) -> Foldable(x)) -> therefore Foldable(jerrylee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "Austen is moody. If someone is moody then they are human. If someone is unwritten and spacial then they are lackluster. Smart, spacial people are moody. If Austen is spacial and Austen is human then Austen is lackluster. Cold people are spacial. White people are twiggy. Austen is spacial.", "logic": "\nMoody(austen)\nforall x (Moody(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Unwritten(x) and Spacial(x) -> Lackluster(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) and Spacial(x) -> Moody(x))\nSpacial(austen) and Human(austen) -> Lackluster(austen)\nforall x (Human(x) -> Spacial(x))\nforall x (Lackluster(x) -> Twiggy(x))\n\nSpacial(austen)\n\nMoody(austen) and forall x (Moody(x) -> Human(x)) -> therefore Human(austen) Human(austen) and forall x (Human(x) -> Spacial(x)) -> therefore Spacial(austen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "Felecia is underage. If someone is underage then they are nebular. If someone is frisian and ebony then they are flaccid. Smart, ebony people are underage. If Felecia is ebony and Felecia is nebular then Felecia is flaccid. Cold people are ebony. White people are averse. Felecia is not ebony.", "logic": "\nUnderage(felecia)\nforall x (Underage(x) -> Nebular(x))\nforall x (Frisian(x) and Ebony(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Fewest(x) and Ebony(x) -> Underage(x))\nEbony(felecia) and Nebular(felecia) -> Flaccid(felecia)\nforall x (Nebular(x) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Flaccid(x) -> Averse(x))\n\nnot Ebony(felecia)\n\nUnderage(felecia) and forall x (Underage(x) -> Nebular(x)) -> therefore Nebular(felecia) Nebular(felecia) and forall x (Nebular(x) -> Ebony(x)) -> therefore Ebony(felecia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "Fergus is decurved. If someone is decurved then they are trite. If someone is unfeminine and unworthy then they are laboring. Smart, unworthy people are decurved. If Fergus is unworthy and Fergus is trite then Fergus is laboring. Cold people are unworthy. White people are declared. Fergus is not coeval.", "logic": "\nDecurved(fergus)\nforall x (Decurved(x) -> Trite(x))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Laboring(x))\nforall x (Coeval(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Decurved(x))\nUnworthy(fergus) and Trite(fergus) -> Laboring(fergus)\nforall x (Trite(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Declared(x))\n\nnot Coeval(fergus)\n\nnot Coeval(fergus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "Praneetf is fetal. If someone is fetal then they are altruistic. If someone is somnific and washable then they are rank. Smart, washable people are fetal. If Praneetf is washable and Praneetf is altruistic then Praneetf is rank. Cold people are washable. White people are decrepit. Praneetf is somnific.", "logic": "\nFetal(praneetf)\nforall x (Fetal(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Somnific(x) and Washable(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Reclaimed(x) and Washable(x) -> Fetal(x))\nWashable(praneetf) and Altruistic(praneetf) -> Rank(praneetf)\nforall x (Altruistic(x) -> Washable(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Decrepit(x))\n\nSomnific(praneetf)\n\nSomnific(praneetf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2035"} {"premises": "The klarika is biennial. The klarika is redemptive. The klarika memorize the pegeen. The klarika memorize the zachariah. The klarika census the pegeen. The pegeen memorize the zachariah. The zachariah is focused. The zachariah is biennial. The zachariah census the klarika. The zachariah suction the pegeen. If someone memorize the pegeen and the pegeen is redemptive then they are biennial. If someone memorize the zachariah then they need the zachariah. If the klarika is focused and the klarika is piteous then the klarika is disgustful. If the pegeen suction the klarika and the pegeen memorize the klarika then the pegeen is piteous. If someone census the zachariah then the zachariah memorize the klarika. If someone memorize the pegeen and they like the klarika then the klarika suction the pegeen. The klarika is biennial.", "logic": "\nBiennial(klarika)\nRedemptive(klarika)\nMemorize(klarika, pegeen)\nMemorize(klarika, zachariah)\nCensus(klarika, pegeen)\nMemorize(pegeen, zachariah)\nFocused(zachariah)\nBiennial(zachariah)\nCensus(zachariah, klarika)\nSuction(zachariah, pegeen)\nforall x (Memorize(x, pegeen) and Redemptive(pegeen) -> Biennial(x))\nforall x (Memorize(x, zachariah) -> Census(x, zachariah))\nFocused(klarika) and Piteous(klarika) -> Disgustful(klarika)\nSuction(pegeen, klarika) and Memorize(pegeen, klarika) -> Piteous(pegeen)\nforall x (Census(x, zachariah) -> Memorize(zachariah, klarika))\nforall x (Memorize(x, pegeen) and Memorize(x, klarika) -> Suction(klarika, pegeen))\n\nBiennial(klarika)\n\ntherefore Biennial(klarika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The praneetf is defective. The praneetf is smuggled. The praneetf reminisce the sheridan. The praneetf reminisce the catherina. The praneetf vegetate the sheridan. The sheridan reminisce the catherina. The catherina is choral. The catherina is defective. The catherina vegetate the praneetf. The catherina reheel the sheridan. If someone reminisce the sheridan and the sheridan is smuggled then they are defective. If someone reminisce the catherina then they need the catherina. If the praneetf is choral and the praneetf is monoploid then the praneetf is filiform. If the sheridan reheel the praneetf and the sheridan reminisce the praneetf then the sheridan is monoploid. If someone vegetate the catherina then the catherina reminisce the praneetf. If someone reminisce the sheridan and they like the praneetf then the praneetf reheel the sheridan. The catherina is not defective.", "logic": "\nDefective(praneetf)\nSmuggled(praneetf)\nReminisce(praneetf, sheridan)\nReminisce(praneetf, catherina)\nVegetate(praneetf, sheridan)\nReminisce(sheridan, catherina)\nChoral(catherina)\nDefective(catherina)\nVegetate(catherina, praneetf)\nReheel(catherina, sheridan)\nforall x (Reminisce(x, sheridan) and Smuggled(sheridan) -> Defective(x))\nforall x (Reminisce(x, catherina) -> Vegetate(x, catherina))\nChoral(praneetf) and Monoploid(praneetf) -> Filiform(praneetf)\nReheel(sheridan, praneetf) and Reminisce(sheridan, praneetf) -> Monoploid(sheridan)\nforall x (Vegetate(x, catherina) -> Reminisce(catherina, praneetf))\nforall x (Reminisce(x, sheridan) and Reminisce(x, praneetf) -> Reheel(praneetf, sheridan))\n\nnot Defective(catherina)\n\ntherefore Defective(catherina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The emmalyn is mammary. The emmalyn is plumb. The emmalyn mistreat the aimee. The emmalyn mistreat the asia. The emmalyn realine the aimee. The aimee mistreat the asia. The asia is caesarean. The asia is mammary. The asia realine the emmalyn. The asia guttle the aimee. If someone mistreat the aimee and the aimee is plumb then they are mammary. If someone mistreat the asia then they need the asia. If the emmalyn is caesarean and the emmalyn is startling then the emmalyn is toxicant. If the aimee guttle the emmalyn and the aimee mistreat the emmalyn then the aimee is startling. If someone realine the asia then the asia mistreat the emmalyn. If someone mistreat the aimee and they like the emmalyn then the emmalyn guttle the aimee. The aimee realine the asia.", "logic": "\nMammary(emmalyn)\nPlumb(emmalyn)\nMistreat(emmalyn, aimee)\nMistreat(emmalyn, asia)\nRealine(emmalyn, aimee)\nMistreat(aimee, asia)\nCaesarean(asia)\nMammary(asia)\nRealine(asia, emmalyn)\nGuttle(asia, aimee)\nforall x (Mistreat(x, aimee) and Plumb(aimee) -> Mammary(x))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, asia) -> Realine(x, asia))\nCaesarean(emmalyn) and Startling(emmalyn) -> Toxicant(emmalyn)\nGuttle(aimee, emmalyn) and Mistreat(aimee, emmalyn) -> Startling(aimee)\nforall x (Realine(x, asia) -> Mistreat(asia, emmalyn))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, aimee) and Mistreat(x, emmalyn) -> Guttle(emmalyn, aimee))\n\nRealine(aimee, asia)\n\nMistreat(aimee, asia) and forall x (Mistreat(x, asia) -> Realine(x, asia)) -> therefore Realine(aimee, asia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The freeman is ethical. The freeman is taxable. The freeman piffle the abel. The freeman piffle the junina. The freeman garnish the abel. The abel piffle the junina. The junina is teentsy. The junina is ethical. The junina garnish the freeman. The junina smart the abel. If someone piffle the abel and the abel is taxable then they are ethical. If someone piffle the junina then they need the junina. If the freeman is teentsy and the freeman is eccrine then the freeman is premedical. If the abel smart the freeman and the abel piffle the freeman then the abel is eccrine. If someone garnish the junina then the junina piffle the freeman. If someone piffle the abel and they like the freeman then the freeman smart the abel. The abel does not need the junina.", "logic": "\nEthical(freeman)\nTaxable(freeman)\nPiffle(freeman, abel)\nPiffle(freeman, junina)\nGarnish(freeman, abel)\nPiffle(abel, junina)\nTeentsy(junina)\nEthical(junina)\nGarnish(junina, freeman)\nSmart(junina, abel)\nforall x (Piffle(x, abel) and Taxable(abel) -> Ethical(x))\nforall x (Piffle(x, junina) -> Garnish(x, junina))\nTeentsy(freeman) and Eccrine(freeman) -> Premedical(freeman)\nSmart(abel, freeman) and Piffle(abel, freeman) -> Eccrine(abel)\nforall x (Garnish(x, junina) -> Piffle(junina, freeman))\nforall x (Piffle(x, abel) and Piffle(x, freeman) -> Smart(freeman, abel))\n\nnot Garnish(abel, junina)\n\nPiffle(abel, junina) and forall x (Piffle(x, junina) -> Garnish(x, junina)) -> therefore Garnish(abel, junina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The schroeder is venous. The schroeder is congruent. The schroeder backstroke the ally. The schroeder backstroke the tori. The schroeder dispute the ally. The ally backstroke the tori. The tori is euphonical. The tori is venous. The tori dispute the schroeder. The tori tide the ally. If someone backstroke the ally and the ally is congruent then they are venous. If someone backstroke the tori then they need the tori. If the schroeder is euphonical and the schroeder is immutable then the schroeder is alveolar. If the ally tide the schroeder and the ally backstroke the schroeder then the ally is immutable. If someone dispute the tori then the tori backstroke the schroeder. If someone backstroke the ally and they like the schroeder then the schroeder tide the ally. The tori backstroke the schroeder.", "logic": "\nVenous(schroeder)\nCongruent(schroeder)\nBackstroke(schroeder, ally)\nBackstroke(schroeder, tori)\nDispute(schroeder, ally)\nBackstroke(ally, tori)\nEuphonical(tori)\nVenous(tori)\nDispute(tori, schroeder)\nTide(tori, ally)\nforall x (Backstroke(x, ally) and Congruent(ally) -> Venous(x))\nforall x (Backstroke(x, tori) -> Dispute(x, tori))\nEuphonical(schroeder) and Immutable(schroeder) -> Alveolar(schroeder)\nTide(ally, schroeder) and Backstroke(ally, schroeder) -> Immutable(ally)\nforall x (Dispute(x, tori) -> Backstroke(tori, schroeder))\nforall x (Backstroke(x, ally) and Backstroke(x, schroeder) -> Tide(schroeder, ally))\n\nBackstroke(tori, schroeder)\n\nBackstroke(schroeder, tori) and forall x (Backstroke(x, tori) -> Dispute(x, tori)) -> therefore Dispute(schroeder, tori) Dispute(schroeder, tori) and forall x (Dispute(x, tori) -> Backstroke(tori, schroeder)) -> therefore Backstroke(tori, schroeder)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The erika is phrenic. The erika is reverent. The erika ballyhoo the mariette. The erika ballyhoo the nils. The erika ridge the mariette. The mariette ballyhoo the nils. The nils is usable. The nils is phrenic. The nils ridge the erika. The nils advertize the mariette. If someone ballyhoo the mariette and the mariette is reverent then they are phrenic. If someone ballyhoo the nils then they need the nils. If the erika is usable and the erika is rachitic then the erika is biennial. If the mariette advertize the erika and the mariette ballyhoo the erika then the mariette is rachitic. If someone ridge the nils then the nils ballyhoo the erika. If someone ballyhoo the mariette and they like the erika then the erika advertize the mariette. The nils does not like the erika.", "logic": "\nPhrenic(erika)\nReverent(erika)\nBallyhoo(erika, mariette)\nBallyhoo(erika, nils)\nRidge(erika, mariette)\nBallyhoo(mariette, nils)\nUsable(nils)\nPhrenic(nils)\nRidge(nils, erika)\nAdvertize(nils, mariette)\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, mariette) and Reverent(mariette) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, nils) -> Ridge(x, nils))\nUsable(erika) and Rachitic(erika) -> Biennial(erika)\nAdvertize(mariette, erika) and Ballyhoo(mariette, erika) -> Rachitic(mariette)\nforall x (Ridge(x, nils) -> Ballyhoo(nils, erika))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, mariette) and Ballyhoo(x, erika) -> Advertize(erika, mariette))\n\nnot Ballyhoo(nils, erika)\n\nBallyhoo(erika, nils) and forall x (Ballyhoo(x, nils) -> Ridge(x, nils)) -> therefore Ridge(erika, nils) Ridge(erika, nils) and forall x (Ridge(x, nils) -> Ballyhoo(nils, erika)) -> therefore Ballyhoo(nils, erika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The jeramie is bushy. The jeramie is dual. The jeramie angle the barnie. The jeramie angle the zuzana. The jeramie smooch the barnie. The barnie angle the zuzana. The zuzana is dilettante. The zuzana is bushy. The zuzana smooch the jeramie. The zuzana respire the barnie. If someone angle the barnie and the barnie is dual then they are bushy. If someone angle the zuzana then they need the zuzana. If the jeramie is dilettante and the jeramie is wheezing then the jeramie is stricken. If the barnie respire the jeramie and the barnie angle the jeramie then the barnie is wheezing. If someone smooch the zuzana then the zuzana angle the jeramie. If someone angle the barnie and they like the jeramie then the jeramie respire the barnie. The jeramie does not visit the barnie.", "logic": "\nBushy(jeramie)\nDual(jeramie)\nAngle(jeramie, barnie)\nAngle(jeramie, zuzana)\nSmooch(jeramie, barnie)\nAngle(barnie, zuzana)\nDilettante(zuzana)\nBushy(zuzana)\nSmooch(zuzana, jeramie)\nRespire(zuzana, barnie)\nforall x (Angle(x, barnie) and Dual(barnie) -> Bushy(x))\nforall x (Angle(x, zuzana) -> Smooch(x, zuzana))\nDilettante(jeramie) and Wheezing(jeramie) -> Stricken(jeramie)\nRespire(barnie, jeramie) and Angle(barnie, jeramie) -> Wheezing(barnie)\nforall x (Smooch(x, zuzana) -> Angle(zuzana, jeramie))\nforall x (Angle(x, barnie) and Angle(x, jeramie) -> Respire(jeramie, barnie))\n\nnot Respire(jeramie, barnie)\n\nforall x (Angle(x, barnie) and Angle(x, jeramie) -> Respire(jeramie, barnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The danica is penile. The danica is detectable. The danica foresee the sim. The danica foresee the amory. The danica misspell the sim. The sim foresee the amory. The amory is elegiac. The amory is penile. The amory misspell the danica. The amory poleaxe the sim. If someone foresee the sim and the sim is detectable then they are penile. If someone foresee the amory then they need the amory. If the danica is elegiac and the danica is shelfy then the danica is hardbound. If the sim poleaxe the danica and the sim foresee the danica then the sim is shelfy. If someone misspell the amory then the amory foresee the danica. If someone foresee the sim and they like the danica then the danica poleaxe the sim. The danica is hardbound.", "logic": "\nPenile(danica)\nDetectable(danica)\nForesee(danica, sim)\nForesee(danica, amory)\nMisspell(danica, sim)\nForesee(sim, amory)\nElegiac(amory)\nPenile(amory)\nMisspell(amory, danica)\nPoleaxe(amory, sim)\nforall x (Foresee(x, sim) and Detectable(sim) -> Penile(x))\nforall x (Foresee(x, amory) -> Misspell(x, amory))\nElegiac(danica) and Shelfy(danica) -> Hardbound(danica)\nPoleaxe(sim, danica) and Foresee(sim, danica) -> Shelfy(sim)\nforall x (Misspell(x, amory) -> Foresee(amory, danica))\nforall x (Foresee(x, sim) and Foresee(x, danica) -> Poleaxe(danica, sim))\n\nHardbound(danica)\n\nElegiac(danica) and Shelfy(danica) -> Hardbound(danica) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The giorgi is reduced. The giorgi is easterly. The giorgi gage the vere. The giorgi gage the gail. The giorgi officer the vere. The vere gage the gail. The gail is ionized. The gail is reduced. The gail officer the giorgi. The gail chock the vere. If someone gage the vere and the vere is easterly then they are reduced. If someone gage the gail then they need the gail. If the giorgi is ionized and the giorgi is napped then the giorgi is abrupt. If the vere chock the giorgi and the vere gage the giorgi then the vere is napped. If someone officer the gail then the gail gage the giorgi. If someone gage the vere and they like the giorgi then the giorgi chock the vere. The gail does not need the gail.", "logic": "\nReduced(giorgi)\nEasterly(giorgi)\nGage(giorgi, vere)\nGage(giorgi, gail)\nOfficer(giorgi, vere)\nGage(vere, gail)\nIonized(gail)\nReduced(gail)\nOfficer(gail, giorgi)\nChock(gail, vere)\nforall x (Gage(x, vere) and Easterly(vere) -> Reduced(x))\nforall x (Gage(x, gail) -> Officer(x, gail))\nIonized(giorgi) and Napped(giorgi) -> Abrupt(giorgi)\nChock(vere, giorgi) and Gage(vere, giorgi) -> Napped(vere)\nforall x (Officer(x, gail) -> Gage(gail, giorgi))\nforall x (Gage(x, vere) and Gage(x, giorgi) -> Chock(giorgi, vere))\n\nnot Officer(gail, gail)\n\nforall x (Gage(x, gail) -> Officer(x, gail)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The brigitta is vinegarish. The brigitta is thirteen. The brigitta demoralize the debra. The brigitta demoralize the olivier. The brigitta collimate the debra. The debra demoralize the olivier. The olivier is titanic. The olivier is vinegarish. The olivier collimate the brigitta. The olivier monetise the debra. If someone demoralize the debra and the debra is thirteen then they are vinegarish. If someone demoralize the olivier then they need the olivier. If the brigitta is titanic and the brigitta is malapropos then the brigitta is uppish. If the debra monetise the brigitta and the debra demoralize the brigitta then the debra is malapropos. If someone collimate the olivier then the olivier demoralize the brigitta. If someone demoralize the debra and they like the brigitta then the brigitta monetise the debra. The olivier monetise the olivier.", "logic": "\nVinegarish(brigitta)\nThirteen(brigitta)\nDemoralize(brigitta, debra)\nDemoralize(brigitta, olivier)\nCollimate(brigitta, debra)\nDemoralize(debra, olivier)\nTitanic(olivier)\nVinegarish(olivier)\nCollimate(olivier, brigitta)\nMonetise(olivier, debra)\nforall x (Demoralize(x, debra) and Thirteen(debra) -> Vinegarish(x))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, olivier) -> Collimate(x, olivier))\nTitanic(brigitta) and Malapropos(brigitta) -> Uppish(brigitta)\nMonetise(debra, brigitta) and Demoralize(debra, brigitta) -> Malapropos(debra)\nforall x (Collimate(x, olivier) -> Demoralize(olivier, brigitta))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, debra) and Demoralize(x, brigitta) -> Monetise(brigitta, debra))\n\nMonetise(olivier, olivier)\n\nMonetise(olivier, olivier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The bathsheba is endless. The bathsheba is microsomal. The bathsheba restrict the adelind. The bathsheba restrict the krysta. The bathsheba cloister the adelind. The adelind restrict the krysta. The krysta is jamesian. The krysta is endless. The krysta cloister the bathsheba. The krysta recommit the adelind. If someone restrict the adelind and the adelind is microsomal then they are endless. If someone restrict the krysta then they need the krysta. If the bathsheba is jamesian and the bathsheba is depressant then the bathsheba is glooming. If the adelind recommit the bathsheba and the adelind restrict the bathsheba then the adelind is depressant. If someone cloister the krysta then the krysta restrict the bathsheba. If someone restrict the adelind and they like the bathsheba then the bathsheba recommit the adelind. The adelind does not visit the bathsheba.", "logic": "\nEndless(bathsheba)\nMicrosomal(bathsheba)\nRestrict(bathsheba, adelind)\nRestrict(bathsheba, krysta)\nCloister(bathsheba, adelind)\nRestrict(adelind, krysta)\nJamesian(krysta)\nEndless(krysta)\nCloister(krysta, bathsheba)\nRecommit(krysta, adelind)\nforall x (Restrict(x, adelind) and Microsomal(adelind) -> Endless(x))\nforall x (Restrict(x, krysta) -> Cloister(x, krysta))\nJamesian(bathsheba) and Depressant(bathsheba) -> Glooming(bathsheba)\nRecommit(adelind, bathsheba) and Restrict(adelind, bathsheba) -> Depressant(adelind)\nforall x (Cloister(x, krysta) -> Restrict(krysta, bathsheba))\nforall x (Restrict(x, adelind) and Restrict(x, bathsheba) -> Recommit(bathsheba, adelind))\n\nnot Recommit(adelind, bathsheba)\n\nnot Recommit(adelind, bathsheba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "The etti is dreamed. The etti is softheaded. The etti suffice the francisco. The etti suffice the britte. The etti cross the francisco. The francisco suffice the britte. The britte is glistering. The britte is dreamed. The britte cross the etti. The britte eradicate the francisco. If someone suffice the francisco and the francisco is softheaded then they are dreamed. If someone suffice the britte then they need the britte. If the etti is glistering and the etti is whiskered then the etti is mercerised. If the francisco eradicate the etti and the francisco suffice the etti then the francisco is whiskered. If someone cross the britte then the britte suffice the etti. If someone suffice the francisco and they like the etti then the etti eradicate the francisco. The francisco suffice the francisco.", "logic": "\nDreamed(etti)\nSoftheaded(etti)\nSuffice(etti, francisco)\nSuffice(etti, britte)\nCross(etti, francisco)\nSuffice(francisco, britte)\nGlistering(britte)\nDreamed(britte)\nCross(britte, etti)\nEradicate(britte, francisco)\nforall x (Suffice(x, francisco) and Softheaded(francisco) -> Dreamed(x))\nforall x (Suffice(x, britte) -> Cross(x, britte))\nGlistering(etti) and Whiskered(etti) -> Mercerised(etti)\nEradicate(francisco, etti) and Suffice(francisco, etti) -> Whiskered(francisco)\nforall x (Cross(x, britte) -> Suffice(britte, etti))\nforall x (Suffice(x, francisco) and Suffice(x, etti) -> Eradicate(etti, francisco))\n\nSuffice(francisco, francisco)\n\nSuffice(francisco, francisco) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1571"} {"premises": "Pat is exanimate. Darrell is awake. Townsend is doughy. If someone is doughy and overmuch then they are awake. Green, doughy people are overmuch. If someone is doughy then they are emboldened. If someone is overmuch then they are exanimate. All made people are overmuch. If someone is made then they are doughy. Pat is exanimate.", "logic": "\nExanimate(pat)\nAwake(darrell)\nDoughy(townsend)\nforall x (Doughy(x) and Overmuch(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and Doughy(x) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Overmuch(x) -> Exanimate(x))\nforall x (Made(x) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Made(x) -> Doughy(x))\n\nExanimate(pat)\n\ntherefore Exanimate(pat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Devi is compound. Melodee is foliaceous. Starr is weekly. If someone is weekly and unblessed then they are foliaceous. Green, weekly people are unblessed. If someone is weekly then they are racking. If someone is unblessed then they are compound. All aphyllous people are unblessed. If someone is aphyllous then they are weekly. Starr is not weekly.", "logic": "\nCompound(devi)\nFoliaceous(melodee)\nWeekly(starr)\nforall x (Weekly(x) and Unblessed(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) and Weekly(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Weekly(x) -> Racking(x))\nforall x (Unblessed(x) -> Compound(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) -> Weekly(x))\n\nnot Weekly(starr)\n\ntherefore Weekly(starr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Nathanael is curling. Jerrylee is unequipped. Zara is henpecked. If someone is henpecked and biggish then they are unequipped. Green, henpecked people are biggish. If someone is henpecked then they are unfeasible. If someone is biggish then they are curling. All iritic people are biggish. If someone is iritic then they are henpecked. Zara is unfeasible.", "logic": "\nCurling(nathanael)\nUnequipped(jerrylee)\nHenpecked(zara)\nforall x (Henpecked(x) and Biggish(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) and Henpecked(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Unfeasible(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) -> Curling(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Henpecked(x))\n\nUnfeasible(zara)\n\nHenpecked(zara) and forall x (Henpecked(x) -> Unfeasible(x)) -> therefore Unfeasible(zara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Paco is dastardly. Verge is knobby. Wat is orderly. If someone is orderly and sleeved then they are knobby. Green, orderly people are sleeved. If someone is orderly then they are amnestic. If someone is sleeved then they are dastardly. All consecrate people are sleeved. If someone is consecrate then they are orderly. Wat is not amnestic.", "logic": "\nDastardly(paco)\nKnobby(verge)\nOrderly(wat)\nforall x (Orderly(x) and Sleeved(x) -> Knobby(x))\nforall x (Amnestic(x) and Orderly(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Amnestic(x))\nforall x (Sleeved(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Consecrate(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Consecrate(x) -> Orderly(x))\n\nnot Amnestic(wat)\n\nOrderly(wat) and forall x (Orderly(x) -> Amnestic(x)) -> therefore Amnestic(wat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Hallam is bimetallic. Pate is forked. Bridget is trapped. If someone is trapped and bengali then they are forked. Green, trapped people are bengali. If someone is trapped then they are gilded. If someone is bengali then they are bimetallic. All angelical people are bengali. If someone is angelical then they are trapped. Bridget is bengali.", "logic": "\nBimetallic(hallam)\nForked(pate)\nTrapped(bridget)\nforall x (Trapped(x) and Bengali(x) -> Forked(x))\nforall x (Gilded(x) and Trapped(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Trapped(x) -> Gilded(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) -> Bimetallic(x))\nforall x (Angelical(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Angelical(x) -> Trapped(x))\n\nBengali(bridget)\n\nTrapped(bridget) and forall x (Trapped(x) -> Gilded(x)) -> therefore Gilded(bridget) Gilded(bridget) and Trapped(bridget) and forall x (Gilded(x) and Trapped(x) -> Bengali(x)) -> therefore Bengali(bridget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Ellis is costumed. Halie is birken. Meriel is fain. If someone is fain and fewer then they are birken. Green, fain people are fewer. If someone is fain then they are atheist. If someone is fewer then they are costumed. All naval people are fewer. If someone is naval then they are fain. Meriel is not fewer.", "logic": "\nCostumed(ellis)\nBirken(halie)\nFain(meriel)\nforall x (Fain(x) and Fewer(x) -> Birken(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) and Fain(x) -> Fewer(x))\nforall x (Fain(x) -> Atheist(x))\nforall x (Fewer(x) -> Costumed(x))\nforall x (Naval(x) -> Fewer(x))\nforall x (Naval(x) -> Fain(x))\n\nnot Fewer(meriel)\n\nFain(meriel) and forall x (Fain(x) -> Atheist(x)) -> therefore Atheist(meriel) Atheist(meriel) and Fain(meriel) and forall x (Atheist(x) and Fain(x) -> Fewer(x)) -> therefore Fewer(meriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Deerdre is crappy. Wanda is potbound. Katuscha is motorial. If someone is motorial and analeptic then they are potbound. Green, motorial people are analeptic. If someone is motorial then they are declarable. If someone is analeptic then they are crappy. All scrub people are analeptic. If someone is scrub then they are motorial. Wanda is not motorial.", "logic": "\nCrappy(deerdre)\nPotbound(wanda)\nMotorial(katuscha)\nforall x (Motorial(x) and Analeptic(x) -> Potbound(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) and Motorial(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Motorial(x) -> Declarable(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Crappy(x))\nforall x (Scrub(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Scrub(x) -> Motorial(x))\n\nnot Motorial(wanda)\n\nforall x (Scrub(x) -> Motorial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Melisent is exocentric. Antonia is knotted. Orin is inordinate. If someone is inordinate and pupillary then they are knotted. Green, inordinate people are pupillary. If someone is inordinate then they are walleyed. If someone is pupillary then they are exocentric. All uncurving people are pupillary. If someone is uncurving then they are inordinate. Antonia is pupillary.", "logic": "\nExocentric(melisent)\nKnotted(antonia)\nInordinate(orin)\nforall x (Inordinate(x) and Pupillary(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) and Inordinate(x) -> Pupillary(x))\nforall x (Inordinate(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Pupillary(x) -> Exocentric(x))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Pupillary(x))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Inordinate(x))\n\nPupillary(antonia)\n\nforall x (Walleyed(x) and Inordinate(x) -> Pupillary(x)) <- forall x (Uncurving(x) -> Inordinate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Philipa is jural. Malissa is impish. Leoine is ungual. If someone is ungual and allelic then they are impish. Green, ungual people are allelic. If someone is ungual then they are semisolid. If someone is allelic then they are jural. All suited people are allelic. If someone is suited then they are ungual. Philipa is not allelic.", "logic": "\nJural(philipa)\nImpish(malissa)\nUngual(leoine)\nforall x (Ungual(x) and Allelic(x) -> Impish(x))\nforall x (Semisolid(x) and Ungual(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) -> Jural(x))\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Ungual(x))\n\nnot Allelic(philipa)\n\nforall x (Semisolid(x) and Ungual(x) -> Allelic(x)) <- forall x (Suited(x) -> Ungual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Doyle is spiritual. Arlana is volumed. Paulina is amnestic. If someone is amnestic and dyed then they are volumed. Green, amnestic people are dyed. If someone is amnestic then they are primo. If someone is dyed then they are spiritual. All tactical people are dyed. If someone is tactical then they are amnestic. Paulina is young.", "logic": "\nSpiritual(doyle)\nVolumed(arlana)\nAmnestic(paulina)\nforall x (Amnestic(x) and Dyed(x) -> Volumed(x))\nforall x (Primo(x) and Amnestic(x) -> Dyed(x))\nforall x (Amnestic(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Dyed(x) -> Spiritual(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Dyed(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Amnestic(x))\n\nYoung(paulina)\n\nYoung(paulina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Sorcha is corsican. Kristen is repellant. Yehudi is skittish. If someone is skittish and actual then they are repellant. Green, skittish people are actual. If someone is skittish then they are cambial. If someone is actual then they are corsican. All crosswise people are actual. If someone is crosswise then they are skittish. Kristen is not crosswise.", "logic": "\nCorsican(sorcha)\nRepellant(kristen)\nSkittish(yehudi)\nforall x (Skittish(x) and Actual(x) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Skittish(x) -> Actual(x))\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Cambial(x))\nforall x (Actual(x) -> Corsican(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) -> Actual(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) -> Skittish(x))\n\nnot Crosswise(kristen)\n\nnot Crosswise(kristen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Donny is swaybacked. Troy is extradural. Serena is mistakable. If someone is mistakable and sleazy then they are extradural. Green, mistakable people are sleazy. If someone is mistakable then they are bionomic. If someone is sleazy then they are swaybacked. All scalelike people are sleazy. If someone is scalelike then they are mistakable. Donny is young.", "logic": "\nSwaybacked(donny)\nExtradural(troy)\nMistakable(serena)\nforall x (Mistakable(x) and Sleazy(x) -> Extradural(x))\nforall x (Bionomic(x) and Mistakable(x) -> Sleazy(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) -> Bionomic(x))\nforall x (Sleazy(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Sleazy(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Mistakable(x))\n\nYoung(donny)\n\nYoung(donny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2330"} {"premises": "Ruthie is inebriated. Natty is camphoric. Natty is outer. Natty is frizzy. Natty is hassidic. Natty is numbing. Natty is preferent. Rufus is outer. Rufus is hassidic. Rufus is numbing. If something is camphoric then it is preferent. Round things are camphoric. Natty is numbing.", "logic": "\nInebriated(ruthie)\nCamphoric(natty)\nOuter(natty)\nFrizzy(natty)\nHassidic(natty)\nNumbing(natty)\nPreferent(natty)\nOuter(rufus)\nHassidic(rufus)\nNumbing(rufus)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Preferent(x))\nforall x (Numbing(x) -> Camphoric(x))\n\nNumbing(natty)\n\ntherefore Numbing(natty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Ward is chantlike. Jeffrey is streaked. Jeffrey is confused. Jeffrey is yielding. Jeffrey is sedative. Jeffrey is skew. Jeffrey is knowing. Layla is confused. Layla is sedative. Layla is skew. If something is streaked then it is knowing. Round things are streaked. Layla is not sedative.", "logic": "\nChantlike(ward)\nStreaked(jeffrey)\nConfused(jeffrey)\nYielding(jeffrey)\nSedative(jeffrey)\nSkew(jeffrey)\nKnowing(jeffrey)\nConfused(layla)\nSedative(layla)\nSkew(layla)\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Skew(x) -> Streaked(x))\n\nnot Sedative(layla)\n\ntherefore Sedative(layla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Nikolia is opaline. Shena is screaming. Shena is acroscopic. Shena is queenly. Shena is unmade. Shena is enhancive. Shena is cadaverous. Rogers is acroscopic. Rogers is unmade. Rogers is enhancive. If something is screaming then it is cadaverous. Round things are screaming. Rogers is screaming.", "logic": "\nOpaline(nikolia)\nScreaming(shena)\nAcroscopic(shena)\nQueenly(shena)\nUnmade(shena)\nEnhancive(shena)\nCadaverous(shena)\nAcroscopic(rogers)\nUnmade(rogers)\nEnhancive(rogers)\nforall x (Screaming(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Screaming(x))\n\nScreaming(rogers)\n\nEnhancive(rogers) and forall x (Enhancive(x) -> Screaming(x)) -> therefore Screaming(rogers)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Ford is peerless. Dunstan is amiable. Dunstan is randy. Dunstan is starred. Dunstan is conceptual. Dunstan is frankish. Dunstan is loopy. Juliet is randy. Juliet is conceptual. Juliet is frankish. If something is amiable then it is loopy. Round things are amiable. Juliet is not amiable.", "logic": "\nPeerless(ford)\nAmiable(dunstan)\nRandy(dunstan)\nStarred(dunstan)\nConceptual(dunstan)\nFrankish(dunstan)\nLoopy(dunstan)\nRandy(juliet)\nConceptual(juliet)\nFrankish(juliet)\nforall x (Amiable(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Frankish(x) -> Amiable(x))\n\nnot Amiable(juliet)\n\nFrankish(juliet) and forall x (Frankish(x) -> Amiable(x)) -> therefore Amiable(juliet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Giuseppe is epidermic. Leon is desperate. Leon is perfumed. Leon is omniscient. Leon is herculean. Leon is fake. Leon is scarce. Ross is perfumed. Ross is herculean. Ross is fake. If something is desperate then it is scarce. Round things are desperate. Ross is scarce.", "logic": "\nEpidermic(giuseppe)\nDesperate(leon)\nPerfumed(leon)\nOmniscient(leon)\nHerculean(leon)\nFake(leon)\nScarce(leon)\nPerfumed(ross)\nHerculean(ross)\nFake(ross)\nforall x (Desperate(x) -> Scarce(x))\nforall x (Fake(x) -> Desperate(x))\n\nScarce(ross)\n\nFake(ross) and forall x (Fake(x) -> Desperate(x)) -> therefore Desperate(ross) Desperate(ross) and forall x (Desperate(x) -> Scarce(x)) -> therefore Scarce(ross)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Merralee is catalatic. Rafe is obscure. Rafe is threepenny. Rafe is necrotic. Rafe is soleless. Rafe is upsetting. Rafe is herbaceous. Lemmy is threepenny. Lemmy is soleless. Lemmy is upsetting. If something is obscure then it is herbaceous. Round things are obscure. Lemmy is not herbaceous.", "logic": "\nCatalatic(merralee)\nObscure(rafe)\nThreepenny(rafe)\nNecrotic(rafe)\nSoleless(rafe)\nUpsetting(rafe)\nHerbaceous(rafe)\nThreepenny(lemmy)\nSoleless(lemmy)\nUpsetting(lemmy)\nforall x (Obscure(x) -> Herbaceous(x))\nforall x (Upsetting(x) -> Obscure(x))\n\nnot Herbaceous(lemmy)\n\nUpsetting(lemmy) and forall x (Upsetting(x) -> Obscure(x)) -> therefore Obscure(lemmy) Obscure(lemmy) and forall x (Obscure(x) -> Herbaceous(x)) -> therefore Herbaceous(lemmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Ferdie is effortful. Herschel is deboned. Herschel is actinoid. Herschel is visual. Herschel is ninefold. Herschel is greyed. Herschel is outlying. Colene is actinoid. Colene is ninefold. Colene is greyed. If something is deboned then it is outlying. Round things are deboned. Ferdie is not outlying.", "logic": "\nEffortful(ferdie)\nDeboned(herschel)\nActinoid(herschel)\nVisual(herschel)\nNinefold(herschel)\nGreyed(herschel)\nOutlying(herschel)\nActinoid(colene)\nNinefold(colene)\nGreyed(colene)\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Greyed(x) -> Deboned(x))\n\nnot Outlying(ferdie)\n\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Outlying(x)) <- forall x (Greyed(x) -> Deboned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Violet is tutorial. Barny is imprisoned. Barny is addable. Barny is liii. Barny is belated. Barny is dissipated. Barny is penitent. Sayre is addable. Sayre is belated. Sayre is dissipated. If something is imprisoned then it is penitent. Round things are imprisoned. Violet is imprisoned.", "logic": "\nTutorial(violet)\nImprisoned(barny)\nAddable(barny)\nLiii(barny)\nBelated(barny)\nDissipated(barny)\nPenitent(barny)\nAddable(sayre)\nBelated(sayre)\nDissipated(sayre)\nforall x (Imprisoned(x) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Dissipated(x) -> Imprisoned(x))\n\nImprisoned(violet)\n\nforall x (Dissipated(x) -> Imprisoned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Matthus is surrounded. Elane is staminate. Elane is oleophobic. Elane is overloaded. Elane is drugless. Elane is slimed. Elane is arcane. Shina is oleophobic. Shina is drugless. Shina is slimed. If something is staminate then it is arcane. Round things are staminate. Matthus is not overloaded.", "logic": "\nSurrounded(matthus)\nStaminate(elane)\nOleophobic(elane)\nOverloaded(elane)\nDrugless(elane)\nSlimed(elane)\nArcane(elane)\nOleophobic(shina)\nDrugless(shina)\nSlimed(shina)\nforall x (Staminate(x) -> Arcane(x))\nforall x (Slimed(x) -> Staminate(x))\n\nnot Overloaded(matthus)\n\nnot Overloaded(matthus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Idalia is thin. Lira is crural. Lira is unwary. Lira is exuberant. Lira is unarguable. Lira is single. Lira is evenhanded. Filipe is unwary. Filipe is unarguable. Filipe is single. If something is crural then it is evenhanded. Round things are crural. Lira is thin.", "logic": "\nThin(idalia)\nCrural(lira)\nUnwary(lira)\nExuberant(lira)\nUnarguable(lira)\nSingle(lira)\nEvenhanded(lira)\nUnwary(filipe)\nUnarguable(filipe)\nSingle(filipe)\nforall x (Crural(x) -> Evenhanded(x))\nforall x (Single(x) -> Crural(x))\n\nThin(lira)\n\nThin(lira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Sula is principled. Chas is nether. Chas is unpitying. Chas is momentous. Chas is metallic. Chas is togolese. Chas is sozzled. Della is unpitying. Della is metallic. Della is togolese. If something is nether then it is sozzled. Round things are nether. Sula is not unpitying.", "logic": "\nPrincipled(sula)\nNether(chas)\nUnpitying(chas)\nMomentous(chas)\nMetallic(chas)\nTogolese(chas)\nSozzled(chas)\nUnpitying(della)\nMetallic(della)\nTogolese(della)\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Sozzled(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> Nether(x))\n\nnot Unpitying(sula)\n\nnot Unpitying(sula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Moina is formulary. Milicent is asthenic. Milicent is xerophytic. Milicent is strong. Milicent is monocled. Milicent is peccant. Milicent is apneic. Lorelle is xerophytic. Lorelle is monocled. Lorelle is peccant. If something is asthenic then it is apneic. Round things are asthenic. Lorelle is strong.", "logic": "\nFormulary(moina)\nAsthenic(milicent)\nXerophytic(milicent)\nStrong(milicent)\nMonocled(milicent)\nPeccant(milicent)\nApneic(milicent)\nXerophytic(lorelle)\nMonocled(lorelle)\nPeccant(lorelle)\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Apneic(x))\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Asthenic(x))\n\nStrong(lorelle)\n\nStrong(lorelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-258"} {"premises": "Devondra is demulcent. Devondra is not internal. Devondra is not uniovular. Devondra is crispate. Devondra is ferocious. Devondra is not crabbed. Maren is demulcent. Maren is masked. Maren is crispate. Maren is ferocious. Maren is not crabbed. Barret is masked. Barret is crispate. Barret is ferocious. Barret is crabbed. If something is internal then it is crispate. If something is internal and not masked then it is not crispate. If something is masked then it is internal. If something is masked and crispate then it is internal. All crabbed things are demulcent. If something is uniovular and not crabbed then it is demulcent. If Devondra is uniovular and Devondra is not crabbed then Devondra is ferocious. If something is demulcent then it is not uniovular. Barret is crispate.", "logic": "\nDemulcent(devondra)\nnot Internal(devondra)\nnot Uniovular(devondra)\nCrispate(devondra)\nFerocious(devondra)\nnot Crabbed(devondra)\nDemulcent(maren)\nMasked(maren)\nCrispate(maren)\nFerocious(maren)\nnot Crabbed(maren)\nMasked(barret)\nCrispate(barret)\nFerocious(barret)\nCrabbed(barret)\nforall x (Internal(x) -> Crispate(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) and not Masked(x) -> not Crispate(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) and Crispate(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Uniovular(x) and not Crabbed(x) -> Demulcent(x))\nUniovular(devondra) and not Crabbed(devondra) -> Ferocious(devondra)\nforall x (Demulcent(x) -> not Uniovular(x))\n\nCrispate(barret)\n\ntherefore Crispate(barret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Rora is mediate. Rora is not boneless. Rora is not incapable. Rora is talky. Rora is sere. Rora is not falcate. Cass is mediate. Cass is crumpled. Cass is talky. Cass is sere. Cass is not falcate. Boniface is crumpled. Boniface is talky. Boniface is sere. Boniface is falcate. If something is boneless then it is talky. If something is boneless and not crumpled then it is not talky. If something is crumpled then it is boneless. If something is crumpled and talky then it is boneless. All falcate things are mediate. If something is incapable and not falcate then it is mediate. If Rora is incapable and Rora is not falcate then Rora is sere. If something is mediate then it is not incapable. Boniface is not sere.", "logic": "\nMediate(rora)\nnot Boneless(rora)\nnot Incapable(rora)\nTalky(rora)\nSere(rora)\nnot Falcate(rora)\nMediate(cass)\nCrumpled(cass)\nTalky(cass)\nSere(cass)\nnot Falcate(cass)\nCrumpled(boniface)\nTalky(boniface)\nSere(boniface)\nFalcate(boniface)\nforall x (Boneless(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Boneless(x) and not Crumpled(x) -> not Talky(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) -> Boneless(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) and Talky(x) -> Boneless(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Mediate(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) and not Falcate(x) -> Mediate(x))\nIncapable(rora) and not Falcate(rora) -> Sere(rora)\nforall x (Mediate(x) -> not Incapable(x))\n\nnot Sere(boniface)\n\ntherefore Sere(boniface)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Danila is lascivious. Danila is not perinatal. Danila is not arching. Danila is anapaestic. Danila is dirt. Danila is not tibial. Cobb is lascivious. Cobb is wonky. Cobb is anapaestic. Cobb is dirt. Cobb is not tibial. Tammi is wonky. Tammi is anapaestic. Tammi is dirt. Tammi is tibial. If something is perinatal then it is anapaestic. If something is perinatal and not wonky then it is not anapaestic. If something is wonky then it is perinatal. If something is wonky and anapaestic then it is perinatal. All tibial things are lascivious. If something is arching and not tibial then it is lascivious. If Danila is arching and Danila is not tibial then Danila is dirt. If something is lascivious then it is not arching. Tammi is lascivious.", "logic": "\nLascivious(danila)\nnot Perinatal(danila)\nnot Arching(danila)\nAnapaestic(danila)\nDirt(danila)\nnot Tibial(danila)\nLascivious(cobb)\nWonky(cobb)\nAnapaestic(cobb)\nDirt(cobb)\nnot Tibial(cobb)\nWonky(tammi)\nAnapaestic(tammi)\nDirt(tammi)\nTibial(tammi)\nforall x (Perinatal(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Perinatal(x) and not Wonky(x) -> not Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Wonky(x) -> Perinatal(x))\nforall x (Wonky(x) and Anapaestic(x) -> Perinatal(x))\nforall x (Tibial(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) and not Tibial(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nArching(danila) and not Tibial(danila) -> Dirt(danila)\nforall x (Lascivious(x) -> not Arching(x))\n\nLascivious(tammi)\n\nTibial(tammi) and forall x (Tibial(x) -> Lascivious(x)) -> therefore Lascivious(tammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Marv is placatory. Marv is not dolabrate. Marv is not unemployed. Marv is idiomatic. Marv is invaluable. Marv is not pugnacious. Hermy is placatory. Hermy is patriotic. Hermy is idiomatic. Hermy is invaluable. Hermy is not pugnacious. Cicely is patriotic. Cicely is idiomatic. Cicely is invaluable. Cicely is pugnacious. If something is dolabrate then it is idiomatic. If something is dolabrate and not patriotic then it is not idiomatic. If something is patriotic then it is dolabrate. If something is patriotic and idiomatic then it is dolabrate. All pugnacious things are placatory. If something is unemployed and not pugnacious then it is placatory. If Marv is unemployed and Marv is not pugnacious then Marv is invaluable. If something is placatory then it is not unemployed. Hermy is not dolabrate.", "logic": "\nPlacatory(marv)\nnot Dolabrate(marv)\nnot Unemployed(marv)\nIdiomatic(marv)\nInvaluable(marv)\nnot Pugnacious(marv)\nPlacatory(hermy)\nPatriotic(hermy)\nIdiomatic(hermy)\nInvaluable(hermy)\nnot Pugnacious(hermy)\nPatriotic(cicely)\nIdiomatic(cicely)\nInvaluable(cicely)\nPugnacious(cicely)\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Idiomatic(x))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) and not Patriotic(x) -> not Idiomatic(x))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) -> Dolabrate(x))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) and Idiomatic(x) -> Dolabrate(x))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) -> Placatory(x))\nforall x (Unemployed(x) and not Pugnacious(x) -> Placatory(x))\nUnemployed(marv) and not Pugnacious(marv) -> Invaluable(marv)\nforall x (Placatory(x) -> not Unemployed(x))\n\nnot Dolabrate(hermy)\n\nPatriotic(hermy) and forall x (Patriotic(x) -> Dolabrate(x)) -> therefore Dolabrate(hermy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Averell is proficient. Averell is not presto. Averell is not unwedded. Averell is nubbly. Averell is smoking. Averell is not wanting. Wyatan is proficient. Wyatan is methylated. Wyatan is nubbly. Wyatan is smoking. Wyatan is not wanting. Gunilla is methylated. Gunilla is nubbly. Gunilla is smoking. Gunilla is wanting. If something is presto then it is nubbly. If something is presto and not methylated then it is not nubbly. If something is methylated then it is presto. If something is methylated and nubbly then it is presto. All wanting things are proficient. If something is unwedded and not wanting then it is proficient. If Averell is unwedded and Averell is not wanting then Averell is smoking. If something is proficient then it is not unwedded. Gunilla is not unwedded.", "logic": "\nProficient(averell)\nnot Presto(averell)\nnot Unwedded(averell)\nNubbly(averell)\nSmoking(averell)\nnot Wanting(averell)\nProficient(wyatan)\nMethylated(wyatan)\nNubbly(wyatan)\nSmoking(wyatan)\nnot Wanting(wyatan)\nMethylated(gunilla)\nNubbly(gunilla)\nSmoking(gunilla)\nWanting(gunilla)\nforall x (Presto(x) -> Nubbly(x))\nforall x (Presto(x) and not Methylated(x) -> not Nubbly(x))\nforall x (Methylated(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Methylated(x) and Nubbly(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Wanting(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Unwedded(x) and not Wanting(x) -> Proficient(x))\nUnwedded(averell) and not Wanting(averell) -> Smoking(averell)\nforall x (Proficient(x) -> not Unwedded(x))\n\nnot Unwedded(gunilla)\n\nWanting(gunilla) and forall x (Wanting(x) -> Proficient(x)) -> therefore Proficient(gunilla) Proficient(gunilla) and forall x (Proficient(x) -> not Unwedded(x)) -> therefore not Unwedded(gunilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Naomi is unholy. Naomi is not skilful. Naomi is not loath. Naomi is verrucose. Naomi is amylolytic. Naomi is not lowland. Isador is unholy. Isador is manageable. Isador is verrucose. Isador is amylolytic. Isador is not lowland. Fernande is manageable. Fernande is verrucose. Fernande is amylolytic. Fernande is lowland. If something is skilful then it is verrucose. If something is skilful and not manageable then it is not verrucose. If something is manageable then it is skilful. If something is manageable and verrucose then it is skilful. All lowland things are unholy. If something is loath and not lowland then it is unholy. If Naomi is loath and Naomi is not lowland then Naomi is amylolytic. If something is unholy then it is not loath. Fernande is loath.", "logic": "\nUnholy(naomi)\nnot Skilful(naomi)\nnot Loath(naomi)\nVerrucose(naomi)\nAmylolytic(naomi)\nnot Lowland(naomi)\nUnholy(isador)\nManageable(isador)\nVerrucose(isador)\nAmylolytic(isador)\nnot Lowland(isador)\nManageable(fernande)\nVerrucose(fernande)\nAmylolytic(fernande)\nLowland(fernande)\nforall x (Skilful(x) -> Verrucose(x))\nforall x (Skilful(x) and not Manageable(x) -> not Verrucose(x))\nforall x (Manageable(x) -> Skilful(x))\nforall x (Manageable(x) and Verrucose(x) -> Skilful(x))\nforall x (Lowland(x) -> Unholy(x))\nforall x (Loath(x) and not Lowland(x) -> Unholy(x))\nLoath(naomi) and not Lowland(naomi) -> Amylolytic(naomi)\nforall x (Unholy(x) -> not Loath(x))\n\nLoath(fernande)\n\nLowland(fernande) and forall x (Lowland(x) -> Unholy(x)) -> therefore Unholy(fernande) Unholy(fernande) and forall x (Unholy(x) -> not Loath(x)) -> therefore not Loath(fernande)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Charlotta is rusted. Charlotta is airtight. Charlotta is port. Charlotta is actionable. Torey is not matronly. Torey is flowerless. Torey is not exegetical. Torey is port. Torey is actionable. Mandy is matronly. Mandy is flowerless. Mandy is rusted. Mandy is exegetical. Mandy is airtight. Mandy is not port. Mandy is actionable. If Charlotta is matronly and Charlotta is port then Charlotta is exegetical. If someone is port and airtight then they are matronly. Mandy is airtight.", "logic": "\nRusted(charlotta)\nAirtight(charlotta)\nPort(charlotta)\nActionable(charlotta)\nnot Matronly(torey)\nFlowerless(torey)\nnot Exegetical(torey)\nPort(torey)\nActionable(torey)\nMatronly(mandy)\nFlowerless(mandy)\nRusted(mandy)\nExegetical(mandy)\nAirtight(mandy)\nnot Port(mandy)\nActionable(mandy)\nMatronly(charlotta) and Port(charlotta) -> Exegetical(charlotta)\nforall x (Port(x) and Airtight(x) -> Matronly(x))\n\nAirtight(mandy)\n\ntherefore Airtight(mandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Ignaz is plumy. Ignaz is biaxal. Ignaz is unintended. Ignaz is cognizant. Wilburn is not blueish. Wilburn is plaguey. Wilburn is not parky. Wilburn is unintended. Wilburn is cognizant. Hilde is blueish. Hilde is plaguey. Hilde is plumy. Hilde is parky. Hilde is biaxal. Hilde is not unintended. Hilde is cognizant. If Ignaz is blueish and Ignaz is unintended then Ignaz is parky. If someone is unintended and biaxal then they are blueish. Hilde is not cognizant.", "logic": "\nPlumy(ignaz)\nBiaxal(ignaz)\nUnintended(ignaz)\nCognizant(ignaz)\nnot Blueish(wilburn)\nPlaguey(wilburn)\nnot Parky(wilburn)\nUnintended(wilburn)\nCognizant(wilburn)\nBlueish(hilde)\nPlaguey(hilde)\nPlumy(hilde)\nParky(hilde)\nBiaxal(hilde)\nnot Unintended(hilde)\nCognizant(hilde)\nBlueish(ignaz) and Unintended(ignaz) -> Parky(ignaz)\nforall x (Unintended(x) and Biaxal(x) -> Blueish(x))\n\nnot Cognizant(hilde)\n\ntherefore Cognizant(hilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Ebenezer is binomial. Ebenezer is cosmogonic. Ebenezer is penitent. Ebenezer is rakish. Kiele is not partial. Kiele is decumbent. Kiele is not chalky. Kiele is penitent. Kiele is rakish. Stephan is partial. Stephan is decumbent. Stephan is binomial. Stephan is chalky. Stephan is cosmogonic. Stephan is not penitent. Stephan is rakish. If Ebenezer is partial and Ebenezer is penitent then Ebenezer is chalky. If someone is penitent and cosmogonic then they are partial. Ebenezer is partial.", "logic": "\nBinomial(ebenezer)\nCosmogonic(ebenezer)\nPenitent(ebenezer)\nRakish(ebenezer)\nnot Partial(kiele)\nDecumbent(kiele)\nnot Chalky(kiele)\nPenitent(kiele)\nRakish(kiele)\nPartial(stephan)\nDecumbent(stephan)\nBinomial(stephan)\nChalky(stephan)\nCosmogonic(stephan)\nnot Penitent(stephan)\nRakish(stephan)\nPartial(ebenezer) and Penitent(ebenezer) -> Chalky(ebenezer)\nforall x (Penitent(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Partial(x))\n\nPartial(ebenezer)\n\nPenitent(ebenezer) and Cosmogonic(ebenezer) and forall x (Penitent(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Partial(x)) -> therefore Partial(ebenezer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Melvin is incurious. Melvin is hieratical. Melvin is eutherian. Melvin is herbaceous. Stan is not organised. Stan is unendowed. Stan is not drastic. Stan is eutherian. Stan is herbaceous. Gavin is organised. Gavin is unendowed. Gavin is incurious. Gavin is drastic. Gavin is hieratical. Gavin is not eutherian. Gavin is herbaceous. If Melvin is organised and Melvin is eutherian then Melvin is drastic. If someone is eutherian and hieratical then they are organised. Melvin is not organised.", "logic": "\nIncurious(melvin)\nHieratical(melvin)\nEutherian(melvin)\nHerbaceous(melvin)\nnot Organised(stan)\nUnendowed(stan)\nnot Drastic(stan)\nEutherian(stan)\nHerbaceous(stan)\nOrganised(gavin)\nUnendowed(gavin)\nIncurious(gavin)\nDrastic(gavin)\nHieratical(gavin)\nnot Eutherian(gavin)\nHerbaceous(gavin)\nOrganised(melvin) and Eutherian(melvin) -> Drastic(melvin)\nforall x (Eutherian(x) and Hieratical(x) -> Organised(x))\n\nnot Organised(melvin)\n\nEutherian(melvin) and Hieratical(melvin) and forall x (Eutherian(x) and Hieratical(x) -> Organised(x)) -> therefore Organised(melvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Adara is familiar. Adara is eighth. Adara is solidified. Adara is cyclical. Cassandra is not uncropped. Cassandra is lateral. Cassandra is not electric. Cassandra is solidified. Cassandra is cyclical. Easton is uncropped. Easton is lateral. Easton is familiar. Easton is electric. Easton is eighth. Easton is not solidified. Easton is cyclical. If Adara is uncropped and Adara is solidified then Adara is electric. If someone is solidified and eighth then they are uncropped. Adara is electric.", "logic": "\nFamiliar(adara)\nEighth(adara)\nSolidified(adara)\nCyclical(adara)\nnot Uncropped(cassandra)\nLateral(cassandra)\nnot Electric(cassandra)\nSolidified(cassandra)\nCyclical(cassandra)\nUncropped(easton)\nLateral(easton)\nFamiliar(easton)\nElectric(easton)\nEighth(easton)\nnot Solidified(easton)\nCyclical(easton)\nUncropped(adara) and Solidified(adara) -> Electric(adara)\nforall x (Solidified(x) and Eighth(x) -> Uncropped(x))\n\nElectric(adara)\n\nSolidified(adara) and Eighth(adara) and forall x (Solidified(x) and Eighth(x) -> Uncropped(x)) -> therefore Uncropped(adara) Uncropped(adara) and Solidified(adara) and Uncropped(adara) and Solidified(adara) -> Electric(adara) -> therefore Electric(adara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Katalin is clear. Katalin is stocky. Katalin is unfinished. Katalin is afraid. Tammi is not laputan. Tammi is rumbling. Tammi is not mexican. Tammi is unfinished. Tammi is afraid. Frannie is laputan. Frannie is rumbling. Frannie is clear. Frannie is mexican. Frannie is stocky. Frannie is not unfinished. Frannie is afraid. If Katalin is laputan and Katalin is unfinished then Katalin is mexican. If someone is unfinished and stocky then they are laputan. Katalin is not mexican.", "logic": "\nClear(katalin)\nStocky(katalin)\nUnfinished(katalin)\nAfraid(katalin)\nnot Laputan(tammi)\nRumbling(tammi)\nnot Mexican(tammi)\nUnfinished(tammi)\nAfraid(tammi)\nLaputan(frannie)\nRumbling(frannie)\nClear(frannie)\nMexican(frannie)\nStocky(frannie)\nnot Unfinished(frannie)\nAfraid(frannie)\nLaputan(katalin) and Unfinished(katalin) -> Mexican(katalin)\nforall x (Unfinished(x) and Stocky(x) -> Laputan(x))\n\nnot Mexican(katalin)\n\nUnfinished(katalin) and Stocky(katalin) and forall x (Unfinished(x) and Stocky(x) -> Laputan(x)) -> therefore Laputan(katalin) Laputan(katalin) and Unfinished(katalin) and Laputan(katalin) and Unfinished(katalin) -> Mexican(katalin) -> therefore Mexican(katalin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Candis is ochre. Candis is tawny. Candis is latter. Candis is ursine. Sonni is not needless. Sonni is belemnitic. Sonni is not quick. Sonni is latter. Sonni is ursine. Margarita is needless. Margarita is belemnitic. Margarita is ochre. Margarita is quick. Margarita is tawny. Margarita is not latter. Margarita is ursine. If Candis is needless and Candis is latter then Candis is quick. If someone is latter and tawny then they are needless. Sonni is not tawny.", "logic": "\nOchre(candis)\nTawny(candis)\nLatter(candis)\nUrsine(candis)\nnot Needless(sonni)\nBelemnitic(sonni)\nnot Quick(sonni)\nLatter(sonni)\nUrsine(sonni)\nNeedless(margarita)\nBelemnitic(margarita)\nOchre(margarita)\nQuick(margarita)\nTawny(margarita)\nnot Latter(margarita)\nUrsine(margarita)\nNeedless(candis) and Latter(candis) -> Quick(candis)\nforall x (Latter(x) and Tawny(x) -> Needless(x))\n\nnot Tawny(sonni)\n\nnot Tawny(sonni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Laurie is medieval. Laurie is ordered. Laurie is shamefaced. Laurie is monumental. Doralyn is not cinerary. Doralyn is intoned. Doralyn is not silly. Doralyn is shamefaced. Doralyn is monumental. Carl is cinerary. Carl is intoned. Carl is medieval. Carl is silly. Carl is ordered. Carl is not shamefaced. Carl is monumental. If Laurie is cinerary and Laurie is shamefaced then Laurie is silly. If someone is shamefaced and ordered then they are cinerary. Doralyn is medieval.", "logic": "\nMedieval(laurie)\nOrdered(laurie)\nShamefaced(laurie)\nMonumental(laurie)\nnot Cinerary(doralyn)\nIntoned(doralyn)\nnot Silly(doralyn)\nShamefaced(doralyn)\nMonumental(doralyn)\nCinerary(carl)\nIntoned(carl)\nMedieval(carl)\nSilly(carl)\nOrdered(carl)\nnot Shamefaced(carl)\nMonumental(carl)\nCinerary(laurie) and Shamefaced(laurie) -> Silly(laurie)\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and Ordered(x) -> Cinerary(x))\n\nMedieval(doralyn)\n\nMedieval(doralyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1693"} {"premises": "Christof is potable. Winfield is amenable. Philbert is crucial. Elliott is auld. All crucial, quenchless things are amenable. All crucial things are quenchless. Christof is potable.", "logic": "\nPotable(christof)\nAmenable(winfield)\nCrucial(philbert)\nAuld(elliott)\nforall x (Crucial(x) and Quenchless(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Quenchless(x))\n\nPotable(christof)\n\ntherefore Potable(christof)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Herby is pimpled. Charita is kafkaesque. Sib is recherche. Gertruda is midland. All recherche, singular things are kafkaesque. All recherche things are singular. Gertruda is not midland.", "logic": "\nPimpled(herby)\nKafkaesque(charita)\nRecherche(sib)\nMidland(gertruda)\nforall x (Recherche(x) and Singular(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Singular(x))\n\nnot Midland(gertruda)\n\ntherefore Midland(gertruda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Allianora is critical. Antonino is julian. Jermaine is invitatory. Hiralal is desultory. All invitatory, bellied things are julian. All invitatory things are bellied. Jermaine is bellied.", "logic": "\nCritical(allianora)\nJulian(antonino)\nInvitatory(jermaine)\nDesultory(hiralal)\nforall x (Invitatory(x) and Bellied(x) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Bellied(x))\n\nBellied(jermaine)\n\nInvitatory(jermaine) and forall x (Invitatory(x) -> Bellied(x)) -> therefore Bellied(jermaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Analiese is pricy. Anya is orphaned. Trish is caesural. Tatiania is restful. All caesural, hemophilic things are orphaned. All caesural things are hemophilic. Trish is not hemophilic.", "logic": "\nPricy(analiese)\nOrphaned(anya)\nCaesural(trish)\nRestful(tatiania)\nforall x (Caesural(x) and Hemophilic(x) -> Orphaned(x))\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\n\nnot Hemophilic(trish)\n\nCaesural(trish) and forall x (Caesural(x) -> Hemophilic(x)) -> therefore Hemophilic(trish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Jennette is romany. Nessa is spiteful. Una is flocculent. Frayda is blocked. All flocculent, inoperable things are spiteful. All flocculent things are inoperable. Una is spiteful.", "logic": "\nRomany(jennette)\nSpiteful(nessa)\nFlocculent(una)\nBlocked(frayda)\nforall x (Flocculent(x) and Inoperable(x) -> Spiteful(x))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Inoperable(x))\n\nSpiteful(una)\n\nFlocculent(una) and forall x (Flocculent(x) -> Inoperable(x)) -> therefore Inoperable(una) Flocculent(una) and Inoperable(una) and forall x (Flocculent(x) and Inoperable(x) -> Spiteful(x)) -> therefore Spiteful(una)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Patrik is purulent. Carmella is synthetic. Burnaby is pimpled. Vicky is duplicate. All pimpled, afghan things are synthetic. All pimpled things are afghan. Burnaby is not synthetic.", "logic": "\nPurulent(patrik)\nSynthetic(carmella)\nPimpled(burnaby)\nDuplicate(vicky)\nforall x (Pimpled(x) and Afghan(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) -> Afghan(x))\n\nnot Synthetic(burnaby)\n\nPimpled(burnaby) and forall x (Pimpled(x) -> Afghan(x)) -> therefore Afghan(burnaby) Pimpled(burnaby) and Afghan(burnaby) and forall x (Pimpled(x) and Afghan(x) -> Synthetic(x)) -> therefore Synthetic(burnaby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Dean is raffish. Sandye is misogynous. May is focal. Loella is reverent. All focal, insoluble things are misogynous. All focal things are insoluble. Loella is not insoluble.", "logic": "\nRaffish(dean)\nMisogynous(sandye)\nFocal(may)\nReverent(loella)\nforall x (Focal(x) and Insoluble(x) -> Misogynous(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Insoluble(x))\n\nnot Insoluble(loella)\n\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Insoluble(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Arlie is sinful. Ingunna is anasarcous. Alisa is presto. Shanan is scriptural. All presto, desirous things are anasarcous. All presto things are desirous. Ingunna is desirous.", "logic": "\nSinful(arlie)\nAnasarcous(ingunna)\nPresto(alisa)\nScriptural(shanan)\nforall x (Presto(x) and Desirous(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nforall x (Presto(x) -> Desirous(x))\n\nDesirous(ingunna)\n\nforall x (Presto(x) -> Desirous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Bela is decompound. Danni is demolished. Neely is enduring. Irwin is xcvi. All enduring, quotidian things are demolished. All enduring things are quotidian. Bela is not demolished.", "logic": "\nDecompound(bela)\nDemolished(danni)\nEnduring(neely)\nXcvi(irwin)\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Quotidian(x) -> Demolished(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> Quotidian(x))\n\nnot Demolished(bela)\n\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Quotidian(x) -> Demolished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Venus is tenebrious. Srinivas is haptic. Melisent is disgraced. Lizabeth is related. All disgraced, quavering things are haptic. All disgraced things are quavering. Srinivas is red.", "logic": "\nTenebrious(venus)\nHaptic(srinivas)\nDisgraced(melisent)\nRelated(lizabeth)\nforall x (Disgraced(x) and Quavering(x) -> Haptic(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) -> Quavering(x))\n\nRed(srinivas)\n\nRed(srinivas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Jody is wide. Manya is tailored. Benito is concealed. Sal is unsociable. All concealed, bipartisan things are tailored. All concealed things are bipartisan. Sal is not rough.", "logic": "\nWide(jody)\nTailored(manya)\nConcealed(benito)\nUnsociable(sal)\nforall x (Concealed(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Concealed(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\n\nnot Rough(sal)\n\nnot Rough(sal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Kikelia is extrusive. Halette is spinose. Stig is fatty. Jeffry is unrewarded. All fatty, unpunctual things are spinose. All fatty things are unpunctual. Stig is extrusive.", "logic": "\nExtrusive(kikelia)\nSpinose(halette)\nFatty(stig)\nUnrewarded(jeffry)\nforall x (Fatty(x) and Unpunctual(x) -> Spinose(x))\nforall x (Fatty(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\n\nExtrusive(stig)\n\nExtrusive(stig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Ainslie is formalised. Ainslie is calycine. Ainslie is rounded. Ainslie is blotchy. Ainslie is mishnaic. Ainslie is venezuelan. Ainslie is diseased. Kayley is rounded. Kayley is venezuelan. Evangelin is venezuelan. Smart people are blotchy. Smart people are venezuelan. Nice people are diseased. All venezuelan, calycine people are formalised. If someone is formalised and venezuelan then they are rounded. If someone is venezuelan then they are formalised. Evangelin is venezuelan.", "logic": "\nFormalised(ainslie)\nCalycine(ainslie)\nRounded(ainslie)\nBlotchy(ainslie)\nMishnaic(ainslie)\nVenezuelan(ainslie)\nDiseased(ainslie)\nRounded(kayley)\nVenezuelan(kayley)\nVenezuelan(evangelin)\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Blotchy(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Venezuelan(x))\nforall x (Rounded(x) -> Diseased(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and Calycine(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) and Venezuelan(x) -> Rounded(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) -> Formalised(x))\n\nVenezuelan(evangelin)\n\ntherefore Venezuelan(evangelin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Levi is amoeban. Levi is saliferous. Levi is animist. Levi is authentic. Levi is sacral. Levi is overhead. Levi is gaunt. Jeromy is animist. Jeromy is overhead. Vitia is overhead. Smart people are authentic. Smart people are overhead. Nice people are gaunt. All overhead, saliferous people are amoeban. If someone is amoeban and overhead then they are animist. If someone is overhead then they are amoeban. Levi is not overhead.", "logic": "\nAmoeban(levi)\nSaliferous(levi)\nAnimist(levi)\nAuthentic(levi)\nSacral(levi)\nOverhead(levi)\nGaunt(levi)\nAnimist(jeromy)\nOverhead(jeromy)\nOverhead(vitia)\nforall x (Sacral(x) -> Authentic(x))\nforall x (Sacral(x) -> Overhead(x))\nforall x (Animist(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Overhead(x) and Saliferous(x) -> Amoeban(x))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) and Overhead(x) -> Animist(x))\nforall x (Overhead(x) -> Amoeban(x))\n\nnot Overhead(levi)\n\ntherefore Overhead(levi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Jean is precursory. Jean is inshore. Jean is bountied. Jean is analytical. Jean is fancied. Jean is unorthodox. Jean is chinked. Yuri is bountied. Yuri is unorthodox. Dian is unorthodox. Smart people are analytical. Smart people are unorthodox. Nice people are chinked. All unorthodox, inshore people are precursory. If someone is precursory and unorthodox then they are bountied. If someone is unorthodox then they are precursory. Yuri is precursory.", "logic": "\nPrecursory(jean)\nInshore(jean)\nBountied(jean)\nAnalytical(jean)\nFancied(jean)\nUnorthodox(jean)\nChinked(jean)\nBountied(yuri)\nUnorthodox(yuri)\nUnorthodox(dian)\nforall x (Fancied(x) -> Analytical(x))\nforall x (Fancied(x) -> Unorthodox(x))\nforall x (Bountied(x) -> Chinked(x))\nforall x (Unorthodox(x) and Inshore(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) and Unorthodox(x) -> Bountied(x))\nforall x (Unorthodox(x) -> Precursory(x))\n\nPrecursory(yuri)\n\nUnorthodox(yuri) and forall x (Unorthodox(x) -> Precursory(x)) -> therefore Precursory(yuri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Herby is colorfast. Herby is uncertain. Herby is noncrucial. Herby is pathless. Herby is earliest. Herby is unfearing. Herby is abasic. Debor is noncrucial. Debor is unfearing. Christal is unfearing. Smart people are pathless. Smart people are unfearing. Nice people are abasic. All unfearing, uncertain people are colorfast. If someone is colorfast and unfearing then they are noncrucial. If someone is unfearing then they are colorfast. Christal is not colorfast.", "logic": "\nColorfast(herby)\nUncertain(herby)\nNoncrucial(herby)\nPathless(herby)\nEarliest(herby)\nUnfearing(herby)\nAbasic(herby)\nNoncrucial(debor)\nUnfearing(debor)\nUnfearing(christal)\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Pathless(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Noncrucial(x) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Uncertain(x) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Noncrucial(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) -> Colorfast(x))\n\nnot Colorfast(christal)\n\nUnfearing(christal) and forall x (Unfearing(x) -> Colorfast(x)) -> therefore Colorfast(christal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Valerie is invariant. Valerie is limber. Valerie is metastable. Valerie is nubby. Valerie is mantic. Valerie is puny. Valerie is groomed. Vanya is metastable. Vanya is puny. Lark is puny. Smart people are nubby. Smart people are puny. Nice people are groomed. All puny, limber people are invariant. If someone is invariant and puny then they are metastable. If someone is puny then they are invariant. Lark is metastable.", "logic": "\nInvariant(valerie)\nLimber(valerie)\nMetastable(valerie)\nNubby(valerie)\nMantic(valerie)\nPuny(valerie)\nGroomed(valerie)\nMetastable(vanya)\nPuny(vanya)\nPuny(lark)\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Nubby(x))\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Puny(x))\nforall x (Metastable(x) -> Groomed(x))\nforall x (Puny(x) and Limber(x) -> Invariant(x))\nforall x (Invariant(x) and Puny(x) -> Metastable(x))\nforall x (Puny(x) -> Invariant(x))\n\nMetastable(lark)\n\nPuny(lark) and forall x (Puny(x) -> Invariant(x)) -> therefore Invariant(lark) Invariant(lark) and Puny(lark) and forall x (Invariant(x) and Puny(x) -> Metastable(x)) -> therefore Metastable(lark)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Germain is bowfront. Germain is jeering. Germain is depraved. Germain is divided. Germain is meshuga. Germain is backswept. Germain is prototypic. Bryce is depraved. Bryce is backswept. Walker is backswept. Smart people are divided. Smart people are backswept. Nice people are prototypic. All backswept, jeering people are bowfront. If someone is bowfront and backswept then they are depraved. If someone is backswept then they are bowfront. Walker is not depraved.", "logic": "\nBowfront(germain)\nJeering(germain)\nDepraved(germain)\nDivided(germain)\nMeshuga(germain)\nBackswept(germain)\nPrototypic(germain)\nDepraved(bryce)\nBackswept(bryce)\nBackswept(walker)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Depraved(x) -> Prototypic(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) and Jeering(x) -> Bowfront(x))\nforall x (Bowfront(x) and Backswept(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) -> Bowfront(x))\n\nnot Depraved(walker)\n\nBackswept(walker) and forall x (Backswept(x) -> Bowfront(x)) -> therefore Bowfront(walker) Bowfront(walker) and Backswept(walker) and forall x (Bowfront(x) and Backswept(x) -> Depraved(x)) -> therefore Depraved(walker)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Pris is parabolic. Pris is nodulated. Pris is subsurface. Pris is portuguese. Pris is closed. Pris is assorted. Pris is hiemal. Fatima is subsurface. Fatima is assorted. Fons is assorted. Smart people are portuguese. Smart people are assorted. Nice people are hiemal. All assorted, nodulated people are parabolic. If someone is parabolic and assorted then they are subsurface. If someone is assorted then they are parabolic. Fons is not portuguese.", "logic": "\nParabolic(pris)\nNodulated(pris)\nSubsurface(pris)\nPortuguese(pris)\nClosed(pris)\nAssorted(pris)\nHiemal(pris)\nSubsurface(fatima)\nAssorted(fatima)\nAssorted(fons)\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Portuguese(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Assorted(x))\nforall x (Subsurface(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Assorted(x) and Nodulated(x) -> Parabolic(x))\nforall x (Parabolic(x) and Assorted(x) -> Subsurface(x))\nforall x (Assorted(x) -> Parabolic(x))\n\nnot Portuguese(fons)\n\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Portuguese(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Ravi is piddling. Ravi is venomous. Ravi is expert. Ravi is adored. Ravi is spiderlike. Ravi is generic. Ravi is guardant. Moyna is expert. Moyna is generic. Welsh is generic. Smart people are adored. Smart people are generic. Nice people are guardant. All generic, venomous people are piddling. If someone is piddling and generic then they are expert. If someone is generic then they are piddling. Moyna is adored.", "logic": "\nPiddling(ravi)\nVenomous(ravi)\nExpert(ravi)\nAdored(ravi)\nSpiderlike(ravi)\nGeneric(ravi)\nGuardant(ravi)\nExpert(moyna)\nGeneric(moyna)\nGeneric(welsh)\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Expert(x) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) and Venomous(x) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) and Generic(x) -> Expert(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Piddling(x))\n\nAdored(moyna)\n\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Adored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Jan is bosomy. Jan is unclogged. Jan is inchoative. Jan is subdural. Jan is branded. Jan is ovine. Jan is absurd. Lillis is inchoative. Lillis is ovine. Ingaborg is ovine. Smart people are subdural. Smart people are ovine. Nice people are absurd. All ovine, unclogged people are bosomy. If someone is bosomy and ovine then they are inchoative. If someone is ovine then they are bosomy. Ingaborg is not unclogged.", "logic": "\nBosomy(jan)\nUnclogged(jan)\nInchoative(jan)\nSubdural(jan)\nBranded(jan)\nOvine(jan)\nAbsurd(jan)\nInchoative(lillis)\nOvine(lillis)\nOvine(ingaborg)\nforall x (Branded(x) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Branded(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) -> Absurd(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) and Unclogged(x) -> Bosomy(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and Ovine(x) -> Inchoative(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> Bosomy(x))\n\nnot Unclogged(ingaborg)\n\nnot Unclogged(ingaborg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Kora is cambodian. Kora is vaginal. Kora is cranky. Kora is archaean. Kora is neandertal. Kora is funguslike. Kora is lissom. Darcey is cranky. Darcey is funguslike. Mab is funguslike. Smart people are archaean. Smart people are funguslike. Nice people are lissom. All funguslike, vaginal people are cambodian. If someone is cambodian and funguslike then they are cranky. If someone is funguslike then they are cambodian. Darcey is vaginal.", "logic": "\nCambodian(kora)\nVaginal(kora)\nCranky(kora)\nArchaean(kora)\nNeandertal(kora)\nFunguslike(kora)\nLissom(kora)\nCranky(darcey)\nFunguslike(darcey)\nFunguslike(mab)\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> Funguslike(x))\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> Lissom(x))\nforall x (Funguslike(x) and Vaginal(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and Funguslike(x) -> Cranky(x))\nforall x (Funguslike(x) -> Cambodian(x))\n\nVaginal(darcey)\n\nVaginal(darcey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Lynnett is hebridean. Lynnett is ignoble. Lynnett is sericeous. Lynnett is leafy. Lynnett is antrorse. Lynnett is anatomic. Lynnett is effluent. Raimund is sericeous. Raimund is anatomic. Conrad is anatomic. Smart people are leafy. Smart people are anatomic. Nice people are effluent. All anatomic, ignoble people are hebridean. If someone is hebridean and anatomic then they are sericeous. If someone is anatomic then they are hebridean. Raimund is not antrorse.", "logic": "\nHebridean(lynnett)\nIgnoble(lynnett)\nSericeous(lynnett)\nLeafy(lynnett)\nAntrorse(lynnett)\nAnatomic(lynnett)\nEffluent(lynnett)\nSericeous(raimund)\nAnatomic(raimund)\nAnatomic(conrad)\nforall x (Antrorse(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Antrorse(x) -> Anatomic(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Effluent(x))\nforall x (Anatomic(x) and Ignoble(x) -> Hebridean(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Anatomic(x) -> Hebridean(x))\n\nnot Antrorse(raimund)\n\nnot Antrorse(raimund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "Dudley is decussate. Dudley is gilded. Dudley is excursive. Dudley is heavy. Dudley is lubberly. Dudley is softish. Dudley is germfree. Dana is excursive. Dana is softish. Sande is softish. Smart people are heavy. Smart people are softish. Nice people are germfree. All softish, gilded people are decussate. If someone is decussate and softish then they are excursive. If someone is softish then they are decussate. Sande is lubberly.", "logic": "\nDecussate(dudley)\nGilded(dudley)\nExcursive(dudley)\nHeavy(dudley)\nLubberly(dudley)\nSoftish(dudley)\nGermfree(dudley)\nExcursive(dana)\nSoftish(dana)\nSoftish(sande)\nforall x (Lubberly(x) -> Heavy(x))\nforall x (Lubberly(x) -> Softish(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Softish(x) and Gilded(x) -> Decussate(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) and Softish(x) -> Excursive(x))\nforall x (Softish(x) -> Decussate(x))\n\nLubberly(sande)\n\nLubberly(sande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-724"} {"premises": "The wendy is not twinning. The wendy is not random. The wendy is hieratic. Big, random things are rustproof. If something is hieratic and not twinning then it is rustproof. Blue, rustproof things are queenlike. All rustproof things are queenlike. All random things are queenlike. If something is rustproof then it is hieratic. The wendy is not random.", "logic": "\nnot Twinning(wendy)\nnot Random(wendy)\nHieratic(wendy)\nforall x (Queenlike(x) and Random(x) -> Rustproof(x))\nforall x (Hieratic(x) and not Twinning(x) -> Rustproof(x))\nforall x (Twinning(x) and Rustproof(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Random(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Hieratic(x))\n\nnot Random(wendy)\n\ntherefore not Random(wendy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The asia is not occult. The asia is not arch. The asia is inherent. Big, arch things are cruel. If something is inherent and not occult then it is cruel. Blue, cruel things are dipylon. All cruel things are dipylon. All arch things are dipylon. If something is cruel then it is inherent. The asia is occult.", "logic": "\nnot Occult(asia)\nnot Arch(asia)\nInherent(asia)\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and Arch(x) -> Cruel(x))\nforall x (Inherent(x) and not Occult(x) -> Cruel(x))\nforall x (Occult(x) and Cruel(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Cruel(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Arch(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Cruel(x) -> Inherent(x))\n\nOccult(asia)\n\ntherefore not Occult(asia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The hermia is not altaic. The hermia is not pentagonal. The hermia is abomasal. Big, pentagonal things are sinitic. If something is abomasal and not altaic then it is sinitic. Blue, sinitic things are reviving. All sinitic things are reviving. All pentagonal things are reviving. If something is sinitic then it is abomasal. The hermia is sinitic.", "logic": "\nnot Altaic(hermia)\nnot Pentagonal(hermia)\nAbomasal(hermia)\nforall x (Reviving(x) and Pentagonal(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and not Altaic(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Altaic(x) and Sinitic(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Abomasal(x))\n\nSinitic(hermia)\n\nAbomasal(hermia) and not Altaic(hermia) and forall x (Abomasal(x) and not Altaic(x) -> Sinitic(x)) -> therefore Sinitic(hermia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The kaia is not skintight. The kaia is not satanic. The kaia is majestic. Big, satanic things are finical. If something is majestic and not skintight then it is finical. Blue, finical things are voltarean. All finical things are voltarean. All satanic things are voltarean. If something is finical then it is majestic. The kaia is not finical.", "logic": "\nnot Skintight(kaia)\nnot Satanic(kaia)\nMajestic(kaia)\nforall x (Voltarean(x) and Satanic(x) -> Finical(x))\nforall x (Majestic(x) and not Skintight(x) -> Finical(x))\nforall x (Skintight(x) and Finical(x) -> Voltarean(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Voltarean(x))\nforall x (Satanic(x) -> Voltarean(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Majestic(x))\n\nnot Finical(kaia)\n\nMajestic(kaia) and not Skintight(kaia) and forall x (Majestic(x) and not Skintight(x) -> Finical(x)) -> therefore Finical(kaia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The devondra is not thai. The devondra is not divinatory. The devondra is louvered. Big, divinatory things are nitrous. If something is louvered and not thai then it is nitrous. Blue, nitrous things are frostian. All nitrous things are frostian. All divinatory things are frostian. If something is nitrous then it is louvered. The devondra is frostian.", "logic": "\nnot Thai(devondra)\nnot Divinatory(devondra)\nLouvered(devondra)\nforall x (Frostian(x) and Divinatory(x) -> Nitrous(x))\nforall x (Louvered(x) and not Thai(x) -> Nitrous(x))\nforall x (Thai(x) and Nitrous(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Nitrous(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Nitrous(x) -> Louvered(x))\n\nFrostian(devondra)\n\nLouvered(devondra) and not Thai(devondra) and forall x (Louvered(x) and not Thai(x) -> Nitrous(x)) -> therefore Nitrous(devondra) Nitrous(devondra) and forall x (Nitrous(x) -> Frostian(x)) -> therefore Frostian(devondra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The cherri is not malarial. The cherri is not auxiliary. The cherri is underwater. Big, auxiliary things are conniving. If something is underwater and not malarial then it is conniving. Blue, conniving things are strangled. All conniving things are strangled. All auxiliary things are strangled. If something is conniving then it is underwater. The cherri is not strangled.", "logic": "\nnot Malarial(cherri)\nnot Auxiliary(cherri)\nUnderwater(cherri)\nforall x (Strangled(x) and Auxiliary(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Underwater(x) and not Malarial(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) and Conniving(x) -> Strangled(x))\nforall x (Conniving(x) -> Strangled(x))\nforall x (Auxiliary(x) -> Strangled(x))\nforall x (Conniving(x) -> Underwater(x))\n\nnot Strangled(cherri)\n\nUnderwater(cherri) and not Malarial(cherri) and forall x (Underwater(x) and not Malarial(x) -> Conniving(x)) -> therefore Conniving(cherri) Conniving(cherri) and forall x (Conniving(x) -> Strangled(x)) -> therefore Strangled(cherri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The gwenneth is not clerical. The gwenneth is not vivacious. The gwenneth is reformist. Big, vivacious things are bowlegged. If something is reformist and not clerical then it is bowlegged. Blue, bowlegged things are patronized. All bowlegged things are patronized. All vivacious things are patronized. If something is bowlegged then it is reformist. The gwenneth does not chase the gwenneth.", "logic": "\nnot Clerical(gwenneth)\nnot Vivacious(gwenneth)\nReformist(gwenneth)\nforall x (Patronized(x) and Vivacious(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) and not Clerical(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nforall x (Clerical(x) and Bowlegged(x) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Vivacious(x) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) -> Reformist(x))\n\nnot Chases(gwenneth, gwenneth)\n\nnot Chases(gwenneth, gwenneth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The abbey is not unbloody. The abbey is not calando. The abbey is eventful. Big, calando things are restive. If something is eventful and not unbloody then it is restive. Blue, restive things are bacillar. All restive things are bacillar. All calando things are bacillar. If something is restive then it is eventful. The abbey needs the abbey.", "logic": "\nnot Unbloody(abbey)\nnot Calando(abbey)\nEventful(abbey)\nforall x (Bacillar(x) and Calando(x) -> Restive(x))\nforall x (Eventful(x) and not Unbloody(x) -> Restive(x))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Restive(x) -> Bacillar(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) -> Bacillar(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Bacillar(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) -> Eventful(x))\n\nNeeds(abbey, abbey)\n\nNeeds(abbey, abbey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1844"} {"premises": "The lissi garnishee the shanda. The lissi is invaluable. The lissi is enfeebling. The lissi is subjugable. The lissi drive the shanda. The lissi metricise the shanda. The shanda garnishee the lissi. The shanda is gummed. The shanda is enfeebling. The shanda is subjugable. The shanda drive the lissi. The shanda metricise the lissi. If the shanda garnishee the lissi then the lissi drive the shanda. If something metricise the lissi and the lissi is gummed then the lissi drive the shanda. If something is gummed then it drive the lissi. If something garnishee the lissi then it metricise the shanda. If something metricise the shanda then it is gummed. If something drive the lissi and the lissi metricise the shanda then it garnishee the shanda. If the lissi is enfeebling and the lissi drive the shanda then the lissi metricise the shanda. If something drive the shanda then it garnishee the lissi. The shanda is enfeebling.", "logic": "\nGarnishee(lissi, shanda)\nInvaluable(lissi)\nEnfeebling(lissi)\nSubjugable(lissi)\nDrive(lissi, shanda)\nMetricise(lissi, shanda)\nGarnishee(shanda, lissi)\nGummed(shanda)\nEnfeebling(shanda)\nSubjugable(shanda)\nDrive(shanda, lissi)\nMetricise(shanda, lissi)\nGarnishee(shanda, lissi) -> Drive(lissi, shanda)\nforall x (Metricise(x, lissi) and Gummed(lissi) -> Drive(lissi, shanda))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Drive(x, lissi))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, lissi) -> Metricise(x, shanda))\nforall x (Metricise(x, shanda) -> Gummed(x))\nforall x (Drive(x, lissi) and Metricise(lissi, shanda) -> Garnishee(x, shanda))\nEnfeebling(lissi) and Drive(lissi, shanda) -> Metricise(lissi, shanda)\nforall x (Drive(x, shanda) -> Garnishee(x, lissi))\n\nEnfeebling(shanda)\n\ntherefore Enfeebling(shanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The ricca drug the garp. The ricca is triassic. The ricca is orthogonal. The ricca is poorly. The ricca plonk the garp. The ricca keen the garp. The garp drug the ricca. The garp is fanged. The garp is orthogonal. The garp is poorly. The garp plonk the ricca. The garp keen the ricca. If the garp drug the ricca then the ricca plonk the garp. If something keen the ricca and the ricca is fanged then the ricca plonk the garp. If something is fanged then it plonk the ricca. If something drug the ricca then it keen the garp. If something keen the garp then it is fanged. If something plonk the ricca and the ricca keen the garp then it drug the garp. If the ricca is orthogonal and the ricca plonk the garp then the ricca keen the garp. If something plonk the garp then it drug the ricca. The garp is not poorly.", "logic": "\nDrug(ricca, garp)\nTriassic(ricca)\nOrthogonal(ricca)\nPoorly(ricca)\nPlonk(ricca, garp)\nKeen(ricca, garp)\nDrug(garp, ricca)\nFanged(garp)\nOrthogonal(garp)\nPoorly(garp)\nPlonk(garp, ricca)\nKeen(garp, ricca)\nDrug(garp, ricca) -> Plonk(ricca, garp)\nforall x (Keen(x, ricca) and Fanged(ricca) -> Plonk(ricca, garp))\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Plonk(x, ricca))\nforall x (Drug(x, ricca) -> Keen(x, garp))\nforall x (Keen(x, garp) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Plonk(x, ricca) and Keen(ricca, garp) -> Drug(x, garp))\nOrthogonal(ricca) and Plonk(ricca, garp) -> Keen(ricca, garp)\nforall x (Plonk(x, garp) -> Drug(x, ricca))\n\nnot Poorly(garp)\n\ntherefore Poorly(garp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The josephine syllabise the carolyne. The josephine is gastric. The josephine is gracious. The josephine is insensate. The josephine analyse the carolyne. The josephine symphonize the carolyne. The carolyne syllabise the josephine. The carolyne is cypriot. The carolyne is gracious. The carolyne is insensate. The carolyne analyse the josephine. The carolyne symphonize the josephine. If the carolyne syllabise the josephine then the josephine analyse the carolyne. If something symphonize the josephine and the josephine is cypriot then the josephine analyse the carolyne. If something is cypriot then it analyse the josephine. If something syllabise the josephine then it symphonize the carolyne. If something symphonize the carolyne then it is cypriot. If something analyse the josephine and the josephine symphonize the carolyne then it syllabise the carolyne. If the josephine is gracious and the josephine analyse the carolyne then the josephine symphonize the carolyne. If something analyse the carolyne then it syllabise the josephine. The josephine syllabise the josephine.", "logic": "\nSyllabise(josephine, carolyne)\nGastric(josephine)\nGracious(josephine)\nInsensate(josephine)\nAnalyse(josephine, carolyne)\nSymphonize(josephine, carolyne)\nSyllabise(carolyne, josephine)\nCypriot(carolyne)\nGracious(carolyne)\nInsensate(carolyne)\nAnalyse(carolyne, josephine)\nSymphonize(carolyne, josephine)\nSyllabise(carolyne, josephine) -> Analyse(josephine, carolyne)\nforall x (Symphonize(x, josephine) and Cypriot(josephine) -> Analyse(josephine, carolyne))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) -> Analyse(x, josephine))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, josephine) -> Symphonize(x, carolyne))\nforall x (Symphonize(x, carolyne) -> Cypriot(x))\nforall x (Analyse(x, josephine) and Symphonize(josephine, carolyne) -> Syllabise(x, carolyne))\nGracious(josephine) and Analyse(josephine, carolyne) -> Symphonize(josephine, carolyne)\nforall x (Analyse(x, carolyne) -> Syllabise(x, josephine))\n\nSyllabise(josephine, josephine)\n\nAnalyse(josephine, carolyne) and forall x (Analyse(x, carolyne) -> Syllabise(x, josephine)) -> therefore Syllabise(josephine, josephine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The betty conduct the tessi. The betty is flaring. The betty is wizard. The betty is coarse. The betty unify the tessi. The betty itemize the tessi. The tessi conduct the betty. The tessi is lordly. The tessi is wizard. The tessi is coarse. The tessi unify the betty. The tessi itemize the betty. If the tessi conduct the betty then the betty unify the tessi. If something itemize the betty and the betty is lordly then the betty unify the tessi. If something is lordly then it unify the betty. If something conduct the betty then it itemize the tessi. If something itemize the tessi then it is lordly. If something unify the betty and the betty itemize the tessi then it conduct the tessi. If the betty is wizard and the betty unify the tessi then the betty itemize the tessi. If something unify the tessi then it conduct the betty. The tessi does not chase the tessi.", "logic": "\nConduct(betty, tessi)\nFlaring(betty)\nWizard(betty)\nCoarse(betty)\nUnify(betty, tessi)\nItemize(betty, tessi)\nConduct(tessi, betty)\nLordly(tessi)\nWizard(tessi)\nCoarse(tessi)\nUnify(tessi, betty)\nItemize(tessi, betty)\nConduct(tessi, betty) -> Unify(betty, tessi)\nforall x (Itemize(x, betty) and Lordly(betty) -> Unify(betty, tessi))\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Unify(x, betty))\nforall x (Conduct(x, betty) -> Itemize(x, tessi))\nforall x (Itemize(x, tessi) -> Lordly(x))\nforall x (Unify(x, betty) and Itemize(betty, tessi) -> Conduct(x, tessi))\nWizard(betty) and Unify(betty, tessi) -> Itemize(betty, tessi)\nforall x (Unify(x, tessi) -> Conduct(x, betty))\n\nnot Conduct(tessi, tessi)\n\nUnify(tessi, betty) and Itemize(betty, tessi) and forall x (Unify(x, betty) and Itemize(betty, tessi) -> Conduct(x, tessi)) -> therefore Conduct(tessi, tessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The larissa smack the marget. The larissa is acquainted. The larissa is sexless. The larissa is eventful. The larissa speck the marget. The larissa harshen the marget. The marget smack the larissa. The marget is windburned. The marget is sexless. The marget is eventful. The marget speck the larissa. The marget harshen the larissa. If the marget smack the larissa then the larissa speck the marget. If something harshen the larissa and the larissa is windburned then the larissa speck the marget. If something is windburned then it speck the larissa. If something smack the larissa then it harshen the marget. If something harshen the marget then it is windburned. If something speck the larissa and the larissa harshen the marget then it smack the marget. If the larissa is sexless and the larissa speck the marget then the larissa harshen the marget. If something speck the marget then it smack the larissa. The larissa speck the larissa.", "logic": "\nSmack(larissa, marget)\nAcquainted(larissa)\nSexless(larissa)\nEventful(larissa)\nSpeck(larissa, marget)\nHarshen(larissa, marget)\nSmack(marget, larissa)\nWindburned(marget)\nSexless(marget)\nEventful(marget)\nSpeck(marget, larissa)\nHarshen(marget, larissa)\nSmack(marget, larissa) -> Speck(larissa, marget)\nforall x (Harshen(x, larissa) and Windburned(larissa) -> Speck(larissa, marget))\nforall x (Windburned(x) -> Speck(x, larissa))\nforall x (Smack(x, larissa) -> Harshen(x, marget))\nforall x (Harshen(x, marget) -> Windburned(x))\nforall x (Speck(x, larissa) and Harshen(larissa, marget) -> Smack(x, marget))\nSexless(larissa) and Speck(larissa, marget) -> Harshen(larissa, marget)\nforall x (Speck(x, marget) -> Smack(x, larissa))\n\nSpeck(larissa, larissa)\n\nHarshen(larissa, marget) and forall x (Harshen(x, marget) -> Windburned(x)) -> therefore Windburned(larissa) Windburned(larissa) and forall x (Windburned(x) -> Speck(x, larissa)) -> therefore Speck(larissa, larissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The lib scam the gerty. The lib is sheepish. The lib is rueful. The lib is effete. The lib unblock the gerty. The lib dislodge the gerty. The gerty scam the lib. The gerty is azido. The gerty is rueful. The gerty is effete. The gerty unblock the lib. The gerty dislodge the lib. If the gerty scam the lib then the lib unblock the gerty. If something dislodge the lib and the lib is azido then the lib unblock the gerty. If something is azido then it unblock the lib. If something scam the lib then it dislodge the gerty. If something dislodge the gerty then it is azido. If something unblock the lib and the lib dislodge the gerty then it scam the gerty. If the lib is rueful and the lib unblock the gerty then the lib dislodge the gerty. If something unblock the gerty then it scam the lib. The lib does not need the lib.", "logic": "\nScam(lib, gerty)\nSheepish(lib)\nRueful(lib)\nEffete(lib)\nUnblock(lib, gerty)\nDislodge(lib, gerty)\nScam(gerty, lib)\nAzido(gerty)\nRueful(gerty)\nEffete(gerty)\nUnblock(gerty, lib)\nDislodge(gerty, lib)\nScam(gerty, lib) -> Unblock(lib, gerty)\nforall x (Dislodge(x, lib) and Azido(lib) -> Unblock(lib, gerty))\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Unblock(x, lib))\nforall x (Scam(x, lib) -> Dislodge(x, gerty))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, gerty) -> Azido(x))\nforall x (Unblock(x, lib) and Dislodge(lib, gerty) -> Scam(x, gerty))\nRueful(lib) and Unblock(lib, gerty) -> Dislodge(lib, gerty)\nforall x (Unblock(x, gerty) -> Scam(x, lib))\n\nnot Unblock(lib, lib)\n\nDislodge(lib, gerty) and forall x (Dislodge(x, gerty) -> Azido(x)) -> therefore Azido(lib) Azido(lib) and forall x (Azido(x) -> Unblock(x, lib)) -> therefore Unblock(lib, lib)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The darrel permeate the illa. The darrel is terminable. The darrel is terminated. The darrel is uncoated. The darrel charcoal the illa. The darrel douche the illa. The illa permeate the darrel. The illa is minus. The illa is terminated. The illa is uncoated. The illa charcoal the darrel. The illa douche the darrel. If the illa permeate the darrel then the darrel charcoal the illa. If something douche the darrel and the darrel is minus then the darrel charcoal the illa. If something is minus then it charcoal the darrel. If something permeate the darrel then it douche the illa. If something douche the illa then it is minus. If something charcoal the darrel and the darrel douche the illa then it permeate the illa. If the darrel is terminated and the darrel charcoal the illa then the darrel douche the illa. If something charcoal the illa then it permeate the darrel. The illa does not need the illa.", "logic": "\nPermeate(darrel, illa)\nTerminable(darrel)\nTerminated(darrel)\nUncoated(darrel)\nCharcoal(darrel, illa)\nDouche(darrel, illa)\nPermeate(illa, darrel)\nMinus(illa)\nTerminated(illa)\nUncoated(illa)\nCharcoal(illa, darrel)\nDouche(illa, darrel)\nPermeate(illa, darrel) -> Charcoal(darrel, illa)\nforall x (Douche(x, darrel) and Minus(darrel) -> Charcoal(darrel, illa))\nforall x (Minus(x) -> Charcoal(x, darrel))\nforall x (Permeate(x, darrel) -> Douche(x, illa))\nforall x (Douche(x, illa) -> Minus(x))\nforall x (Charcoal(x, darrel) and Douche(darrel, illa) -> Permeate(x, illa))\nTerminated(darrel) and Charcoal(darrel, illa) -> Douche(darrel, illa)\nforall x (Charcoal(x, illa) -> Permeate(x, darrel))\n\nnot Charcoal(illa, illa)\n\nnot Charcoal(illa, illa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The griffin gruntle the blake. The griffin is gaelic. The griffin is faux. The griffin is unoriented. The griffin lower the blake. The griffin inundate the blake. The blake gruntle the griffin. The blake is melodic. The blake is faux. The blake is unoriented. The blake lower the griffin. The blake inundate the griffin. If the blake gruntle the griffin then the griffin lower the blake. If something inundate the griffin and the griffin is melodic then the griffin lower the blake. If something is melodic then it lower the griffin. If something gruntle the griffin then it inundate the blake. If something inundate the blake then it is melodic. If something lower the griffin and the griffin inundate the blake then it gruntle the blake. If the griffin is faux and the griffin lower the blake then the griffin inundate the blake. If something lower the blake then it gruntle the griffin. The griffin is big.", "logic": "\nGruntle(griffin, blake)\nGaelic(griffin)\nFaux(griffin)\nUnoriented(griffin)\nLower(griffin, blake)\nInundate(griffin, blake)\nGruntle(blake, griffin)\nMelodic(blake)\nFaux(blake)\nUnoriented(blake)\nLower(blake, griffin)\nInundate(blake, griffin)\nGruntle(blake, griffin) -> Lower(griffin, blake)\nforall x (Inundate(x, griffin) and Melodic(griffin) -> Lower(griffin, blake))\nforall x (Melodic(x) -> Lower(x, griffin))\nforall x (Gruntle(x, griffin) -> Inundate(x, blake))\nforall x (Inundate(x, blake) -> Melodic(x))\nforall x (Lower(x, griffin) and Inundate(griffin, blake) -> Gruntle(x, blake))\nFaux(griffin) and Lower(griffin, blake) -> Inundate(griffin, blake)\nforall x (Lower(x, blake) -> Gruntle(x, griffin))\n\nBig(griffin)\n\nBig(griffin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The gershom archive the wake. The gershom is compact. The gershom is published. The gershom is precious. The gershom suspend the wake. The gershom ghost the wake. The wake archive the gershom. The wake is mensal. The wake is published. The wake is precious. The wake suspend the gershom. The wake ghost the gershom. If the wake archive the gershom then the gershom suspend the wake. If something ghost the gershom and the gershom is mensal then the gershom suspend the wake. If something is mensal then it suspend the gershom. If something archive the gershom then it ghost the wake. If something ghost the wake then it is mensal. If something suspend the gershom and the gershom ghost the wake then it archive the wake. If the gershom is published and the gershom suspend the wake then the gershom ghost the wake. If something suspend the wake then it archive the gershom. The wake is not big.", "logic": "\nArchive(gershom, wake)\nCompact(gershom)\nPublished(gershom)\nPrecious(gershom)\nSuspend(gershom, wake)\nGhost(gershom, wake)\nArchive(wake, gershom)\nMensal(wake)\nPublished(wake)\nPrecious(wake)\nSuspend(wake, gershom)\nGhost(wake, gershom)\nArchive(wake, gershom) -> Suspend(gershom, wake)\nforall x (Ghost(x, gershom) and Mensal(gershom) -> Suspend(gershom, wake))\nforall x (Mensal(x) -> Suspend(x, gershom))\nforall x (Archive(x, gershom) -> Ghost(x, wake))\nforall x (Ghost(x, wake) -> Mensal(x))\nforall x (Suspend(x, gershom) and Ghost(gershom, wake) -> Archive(x, wake))\nPublished(gershom) and Suspend(gershom, wake) -> Ghost(gershom, wake)\nforall x (Suspend(x, wake) -> Archive(x, gershom))\n\nnot Big(wake)\n\nnot Big(wake) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The cheri imprison the tiffie. The cheri is fused. The cheri is overaged. The cheri is ambiguous. The cheri prim the tiffie. The cheri decoct the tiffie. The tiffie imprison the cheri. The tiffie is slatey. The tiffie is overaged. The tiffie is ambiguous. The tiffie prim the cheri. The tiffie decoct the cheri. If the tiffie imprison the cheri then the cheri prim the tiffie. If something decoct the cheri and the cheri is slatey then the cheri prim the tiffie. If something is slatey then it prim the cheri. If something imprison the cheri then it decoct the tiffie. If something decoct the tiffie then it is slatey. If something prim the cheri and the cheri decoct the tiffie then it imprison the tiffie. If the cheri is overaged and the cheri prim the tiffie then the cheri decoct the tiffie. If something prim the tiffie then it imprison the cheri. The tiffie is fused.", "logic": "\nImprison(cheri, tiffie)\nFused(cheri)\nOveraged(cheri)\nAmbiguous(cheri)\nPrim(cheri, tiffie)\nDecoct(cheri, tiffie)\nImprison(tiffie, cheri)\nSlatey(tiffie)\nOveraged(tiffie)\nAmbiguous(tiffie)\nPrim(tiffie, cheri)\nDecoct(tiffie, cheri)\nImprison(tiffie, cheri) -> Prim(cheri, tiffie)\nforall x (Decoct(x, cheri) and Slatey(cheri) -> Prim(cheri, tiffie))\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Prim(x, cheri))\nforall x (Imprison(x, cheri) -> Decoct(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Decoct(x, tiffie) -> Slatey(x))\nforall x (Prim(x, cheri) and Decoct(cheri, tiffie) -> Imprison(x, tiffie))\nOveraged(cheri) and Prim(cheri, tiffie) -> Decoct(cheri, tiffie)\nforall x (Prim(x, tiffie) -> Imprison(x, cheri))\n\nFused(tiffie)\n\nFused(tiffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The antony is cleft. All cleft things are downstair. If the antony is gerundial and the antony is cleft then the antony is aromatic. If something is downstair and gerundial then it is cleft. If something is cleft and downstair then it is gerundial. If the antony is cleft and the antony is frowzled then the antony is gerundial. If something is cleft then it is downstair. All downstair, gerundial things are frowzled. All gerundial, frowzled things are downstair. The antony is cleft.", "logic": "\nCleft(antony)\nforall x (Cleft(x) -> Downstair(x))\nGerundial(antony) and Cleft(antony) -> Aromatic(antony)\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Gerundial(x) -> Cleft(x))\nforall x (Cleft(x) and Downstair(x) -> Gerundial(x))\nCleft(antony) and Frowzled(antony) -> Gerundial(antony)\nforall x (Cleft(x) -> Downstair(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Gerundial(x) -> Frowzled(x))\nforall x (Gerundial(x) and Frowzled(x) -> Downstair(x))\n\nCleft(antony)\n\ntherefore Cleft(antony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The karlene is hunted. All hunted things are feathered. If the karlene is packable and the karlene is hunted then the karlene is rightful. If something is feathered and packable then it is hunted. If something is hunted and feathered then it is packable. If the karlene is hunted and the karlene is adust then the karlene is packable. If something is hunted then it is feathered. All feathered, packable things are adust. All packable, adust things are feathered. The karlene is not hunted.", "logic": "\nHunted(karlene)\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Feathered(x))\nPackable(karlene) and Hunted(karlene) -> Rightful(karlene)\nforall x (Feathered(x) and Packable(x) -> Hunted(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) and Feathered(x) -> Packable(x))\nHunted(karlene) and Adust(karlene) -> Packable(karlene)\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Feathered(x) and Packable(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Packable(x) and Adust(x) -> Feathered(x))\n\nnot Hunted(karlene)\n\ntherefore Hunted(karlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The aaron is marketable. All marketable things are pressor. If the aaron is horrified and the aaron is marketable then the aaron is expansive. If something is pressor and horrified then it is marketable. If something is marketable and pressor then it is horrified. If the aaron is marketable and the aaron is conceited then the aaron is horrified. If something is marketable then it is pressor. All pressor, horrified things are conceited. All horrified, conceited things are pressor. The aaron is pressor.", "logic": "\nMarketable(aaron)\nforall x (Marketable(x) -> Pressor(x))\nHorrified(aaron) and Marketable(aaron) -> Expansive(aaron)\nforall x (Pressor(x) and Horrified(x) -> Marketable(x))\nforall x (Marketable(x) and Pressor(x) -> Horrified(x))\nMarketable(aaron) and Conceited(aaron) -> Horrified(aaron)\nforall x (Marketable(x) -> Pressor(x))\nforall x (Pressor(x) and Horrified(x) -> Conceited(x))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Conceited(x) -> Pressor(x))\n\nPressor(aaron)\n\nMarketable(aaron) and forall x (Marketable(x) -> Pressor(x)) -> therefore Pressor(aaron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The georg is successful. All successful things are uricosuric. If the georg is changeful and the georg is successful then the georg is ungulate. If something is uricosuric and changeful then it is successful. If something is successful and uricosuric then it is changeful. If the georg is successful and the georg is armlike then the georg is changeful. If something is successful then it is uricosuric. All uricosuric, changeful things are armlike. All changeful, armlike things are uricosuric. The georg is not uricosuric.", "logic": "\nSuccessful(georg)\nforall x (Successful(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\nChangeful(georg) and Successful(georg) -> Ungulate(georg)\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) and Changeful(x) -> Successful(x))\nforall x (Successful(x) and Uricosuric(x) -> Changeful(x))\nSuccessful(georg) and Armlike(georg) -> Changeful(georg)\nforall x (Successful(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) and Changeful(x) -> Armlike(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) and Armlike(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\n\nnot Uricosuric(georg)\n\nSuccessful(georg) and forall x (Successful(x) -> Uricosuric(x)) -> therefore Uricosuric(georg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The nate is emotional. All emotional things are umbellar. If the nate is expansile and the nate is emotional then the nate is poetic. If something is umbellar and expansile then it is emotional. If something is emotional and umbellar then it is expansile. If the nate is emotional and the nate is nonracial then the nate is expansile. If something is emotional then it is umbellar. All umbellar, expansile things are nonracial. All expansile, nonracial things are umbellar. The nate is expansile.", "logic": "\nEmotional(nate)\nforall x (Emotional(x) -> Umbellar(x))\nExpansile(nate) and Emotional(nate) -> Poetic(nate)\nforall x (Umbellar(x) and Expansile(x) -> Emotional(x))\nforall x (Emotional(x) and Umbellar(x) -> Expansile(x))\nEmotional(nate) and Nonracial(nate) -> Expansile(nate)\nforall x (Emotional(x) -> Umbellar(x))\nforall x (Umbellar(x) and Expansile(x) -> Nonracial(x))\nforall x (Expansile(x) and Nonracial(x) -> Umbellar(x))\n\nExpansile(nate)\n\nEmotional(nate) and forall x (Emotional(x) -> Umbellar(x)) -> therefore Umbellar(nate) Emotional(nate) and Umbellar(nate) and forall x (Emotional(x) and Umbellar(x) -> Expansile(x)) -> therefore Expansile(nate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The dode is northmost. All northmost things are injured. If the dode is tracheal and the dode is northmost then the dode is caring. If something is injured and tracheal then it is northmost. If something is northmost and injured then it is tracheal. If the dode is northmost and the dode is unattended then the dode is tracheal. If something is northmost then it is injured. All injured, tracheal things are unattended. All tracheal, unattended things are injured. The dode is not tracheal.", "logic": "\nNorthmost(dode)\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Injured(x))\nTracheal(dode) and Northmost(dode) -> Caring(dode)\nforall x (Injured(x) and Tracheal(x) -> Northmost(x))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and Injured(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nNorthmost(dode) and Unattended(dode) -> Tracheal(dode)\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Injured(x))\nforall x (Injured(x) and Tracheal(x) -> Unattended(x))\nforall x (Tracheal(x) and Unattended(x) -> Injured(x))\n\nnot Tracheal(dode)\n\nNorthmost(dode) and forall x (Northmost(x) -> Injured(x)) -> therefore Injured(dode) Northmost(dode) and Injured(dode) and forall x (Northmost(x) and Injured(x) -> Tracheal(x)) -> therefore Tracheal(dode)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The chickie is procumbent. All procumbent things are aloof. If the chickie is pouchlike and the chickie is procumbent then the chickie is universal. If something is aloof and pouchlike then it is procumbent. If something is procumbent and aloof then it is pouchlike. If the chickie is procumbent and the chickie is broke then the chickie is pouchlike. If something is procumbent then it is aloof. All aloof, pouchlike things are broke. All pouchlike, broke things are aloof. The chickie does not need the chickie.", "logic": "\nProcumbent(chickie)\nforall x (Procumbent(x) -> Aloof(x))\nPouchlike(chickie) and Procumbent(chickie) -> Universal(chickie)\nforall x (Aloof(x) and Pouchlike(x) -> Procumbent(x))\nforall x (Procumbent(x) and Aloof(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nProcumbent(chickie) and Broke(chickie) -> Pouchlike(chickie)\nforall x (Procumbent(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) and Pouchlike(x) -> Broke(x))\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) and Broke(x) -> Aloof(x))\n\nnot Needs(chickie, chickie)\n\nnot Needs(chickie, chickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The devondra is doctoral. All doctoral things are ascendible. If the devondra is aestival and the devondra is doctoral then the devondra is acanthous. If something is ascendible and aestival then it is doctoral. If something is doctoral and ascendible then it is aestival. If the devondra is doctoral and the devondra is itinerant then the devondra is aestival. If something is doctoral then it is ascendible. All ascendible, aestival things are itinerant. All aestival, itinerant things are ascendible. The devondra chases the devondra.", "logic": "\nDoctoral(devondra)\nforall x (Doctoral(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nAestival(devondra) and Doctoral(devondra) -> Acanthous(devondra)\nforall x (Ascendible(x) and Aestival(x) -> Doctoral(x))\nforall x (Doctoral(x) and Ascendible(x) -> Aestival(x))\nDoctoral(devondra) and Itinerant(devondra) -> Aestival(devondra)\nforall x (Doctoral(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) and Aestival(x) -> Itinerant(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) and Itinerant(x) -> Ascendible(x))\n\nChases(devondra, devondra)\n\nChases(devondra, devondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1007"} {"premises": "The felix is sacred. The felix is cuspated. The felix calm the babette. The felix calm the spiro. The felix dizzy the spiro. The babette is iniquitous. The babette calm the spiro. The babette dizzy the elvera. The elvera bowdlerise the babette. The elvera dizzy the felix. The elvera dizzy the spiro. The spiro is undecided. The spiro is iniquitous. The spiro calm the felix. The spiro calm the elvera. The spiro dizzy the elvera. If someone calm the babette then the babette is iniquitous. If someone calm the felix and the felix calm the spiro then the spiro is cuspated. If someone is cuspated then they eat the babette. The spiro is undecided.", "logic": "\nSacred(felix)\nCuspated(felix)\nCalm(felix, babette)\nCalm(felix, spiro)\nDizzy(felix, spiro)\nIniquitous(babette)\nCalm(babette, spiro)\nDizzy(babette, elvera)\nBowdlerise(elvera, babette)\nDizzy(elvera, felix)\nDizzy(elvera, spiro)\nUndecided(spiro)\nIniquitous(spiro)\nCalm(spiro, felix)\nCalm(spiro, elvera)\nDizzy(spiro, elvera)\nforall x (Calm(x, babette) -> Iniquitous(babette))\nforall x (Calm(x, felix) and Calm(felix, spiro) -> Cuspated(spiro))\nforall x (Cuspated(x) -> Bowdlerise(x, babette))\n\nUndecided(spiro)\n\ntherefore Undecided(spiro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The chaunce is unknowing. The chaunce is iliac. The chaunce flub the rocky. The chaunce flub the gustavo. The chaunce bleep the gustavo. The rocky is fictive. The rocky flub the gustavo. The rocky bleep the antony. The antony autoclave the rocky. The antony bleep the chaunce. The antony bleep the gustavo. The gustavo is vexing. The gustavo is fictive. The gustavo flub the chaunce. The gustavo flub the antony. The gustavo bleep the antony. If someone flub the rocky then the rocky is fictive. If someone flub the chaunce and the chaunce flub the gustavo then the gustavo is iliac. If someone is iliac then they eat the rocky. The gustavo does not visit the antony.", "logic": "\nUnknowing(chaunce)\nIliac(chaunce)\nFlub(chaunce, rocky)\nFlub(chaunce, gustavo)\nBleep(chaunce, gustavo)\nFictive(rocky)\nFlub(rocky, gustavo)\nBleep(rocky, antony)\nAutoclave(antony, rocky)\nBleep(antony, chaunce)\nBleep(antony, gustavo)\nVexing(gustavo)\nFictive(gustavo)\nFlub(gustavo, chaunce)\nFlub(gustavo, antony)\nBleep(gustavo, antony)\nforall x (Flub(x, rocky) -> Fictive(rocky))\nforall x (Flub(x, chaunce) and Flub(chaunce, gustavo) -> Iliac(gustavo))\nforall x (Iliac(x) -> Autoclave(x, rocky))\n\nnot Bleep(gustavo, antony)\n\ntherefore Bleep(gustavo, antony)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The fannie is gyral. The fannie is berried. The fannie sort the allah. The fannie sort the bubba. The fannie declare the bubba. The allah is nubbly. The allah sort the bubba. The allah declare the adair. The adair jolt the allah. The adair declare the fannie. The adair declare the bubba. The bubba is seljuk. The bubba is nubbly. The bubba sort the fannie. The bubba sort the adair. The bubba declare the adair. If someone sort the allah then the allah is nubbly. If someone sort the fannie and the fannie sort the bubba then the bubba is berried. If someone is berried then they eat the allah. The fannie jolt the allah.", "logic": "\nGyral(fannie)\nBerried(fannie)\nSort(fannie, allah)\nSort(fannie, bubba)\nDeclare(fannie, bubba)\nNubbly(allah)\nSort(allah, bubba)\nDeclare(allah, adair)\nJolt(adair, allah)\nDeclare(adair, fannie)\nDeclare(adair, bubba)\nSeljuk(bubba)\nNubbly(bubba)\nSort(bubba, fannie)\nSort(bubba, adair)\nDeclare(bubba, adair)\nforall x (Sort(x, allah) -> Nubbly(allah))\nforall x (Sort(x, fannie) and Sort(fannie, bubba) -> Berried(bubba))\nforall x (Berried(x) -> Jolt(x, allah))\n\nJolt(fannie, allah)\n\nBerried(fannie) and forall x (Berried(x) -> Jolt(x, allah)) -> therefore Jolt(fannie, allah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The kittie is apocryphal. The kittie is optimal. The kittie besot the reba. The kittie besot the johny. The kittie trouble the johny. The reba is chronic. The reba besot the johny. The reba trouble the celestine. The celestine tangle the reba. The celestine trouble the kittie. The celestine trouble the johny. The johny is okay. The johny is chronic. The johny besot the kittie. The johny besot the celestine. The johny trouble the celestine. If someone besot the reba then the reba is chronic. If someone besot the kittie and the kittie besot the johny then the johny is optimal. If someone is optimal then they eat the reba. The kittie does not eat the reba.", "logic": "\nApocryphal(kittie)\nOptimal(kittie)\nBesot(kittie, reba)\nBesot(kittie, johny)\nTrouble(kittie, johny)\nChronic(reba)\nBesot(reba, johny)\nTrouble(reba, celestine)\nTangle(celestine, reba)\nTrouble(celestine, kittie)\nTrouble(celestine, johny)\nOkay(johny)\nChronic(johny)\nBesot(johny, kittie)\nBesot(johny, celestine)\nTrouble(johny, celestine)\nforall x (Besot(x, reba) -> Chronic(reba))\nforall x (Besot(x, kittie) and Besot(kittie, johny) -> Optimal(johny))\nforall x (Optimal(x) -> Tangle(x, reba))\n\nnot Tangle(kittie, reba)\n\nOptimal(kittie) and forall x (Optimal(x) -> Tangle(x, reba)) -> therefore Tangle(kittie, reba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The lemar is heraldic. The lemar is affine. The lemar defraud the horatia. The lemar defraud the aline. The lemar forgather the aline. The horatia is respondent. The horatia defraud the aline. The horatia forgather the abel. The abel gamble the horatia. The abel forgather the lemar. The abel forgather the aline. The aline is azimuthal. The aline is respondent. The aline defraud the lemar. The aline defraud the abel. The aline forgather the abel. If someone defraud the horatia then the horatia is respondent. If someone defraud the lemar and the lemar defraud the aline then the aline is affine. If someone is affine then they eat the horatia. The aline gamble the horatia.", "logic": "\nHeraldic(lemar)\nAffine(lemar)\nDefraud(lemar, horatia)\nDefraud(lemar, aline)\nForgather(lemar, aline)\nRespondent(horatia)\nDefraud(horatia, aline)\nForgather(horatia, abel)\nGamble(abel, horatia)\nForgather(abel, lemar)\nForgather(abel, aline)\nAzimuthal(aline)\nRespondent(aline)\nDefraud(aline, lemar)\nDefraud(aline, abel)\nForgather(aline, abel)\nforall x (Defraud(x, horatia) -> Respondent(horatia))\nforall x (Defraud(x, lemar) and Defraud(lemar, aline) -> Affine(aline))\nforall x (Affine(x) -> Gamble(x, horatia))\n\nGamble(aline, horatia)\n\nDefraud(aline, lemar) and Defraud(lemar, aline) and forall x (Defraud(x, lemar) and Defraud(lemar, aline) -> Affine(aline)) -> therefore Affine(aline) Affine(aline) and forall x (Affine(x) -> Gamble(x, horatia)) -> therefore Gamble(aline, horatia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The anallese is blazing. The anallese is louvered. The anallese abstain the alford. The anallese abstain the briny. The anallese razor the briny. The alford is alert. The alford abstain the briny. The alford razor the albertine. The albertine convert the alford. The albertine razor the anallese. The albertine razor the briny. The briny is spacy. The briny is alert. The briny abstain the anallese. The briny abstain the albertine. The briny razor the albertine. If someone abstain the alford then the alford is alert. If someone abstain the anallese and the anallese abstain the briny then the briny is louvered. If someone is louvered then they eat the alford. The briny does not eat the alford.", "logic": "\nBlazing(anallese)\nLouvered(anallese)\nAbstain(anallese, alford)\nAbstain(anallese, briny)\nRazor(anallese, briny)\nAlert(alford)\nAbstain(alford, briny)\nRazor(alford, albertine)\nConvert(albertine, alford)\nRazor(albertine, anallese)\nRazor(albertine, briny)\nSpacy(briny)\nAlert(briny)\nAbstain(briny, anallese)\nAbstain(briny, albertine)\nRazor(briny, albertine)\nforall x (Abstain(x, alford) -> Alert(alford))\nforall x (Abstain(x, anallese) and Abstain(anallese, briny) -> Louvered(briny))\nforall x (Louvered(x) -> Convert(x, alford))\n\nnot Convert(briny, alford)\n\nAbstain(briny, anallese) and Abstain(anallese, briny) and forall x (Abstain(x, anallese) and Abstain(anallese, briny) -> Louvered(briny)) -> therefore Louvered(briny) Louvered(briny) and forall x (Louvered(x) -> Convert(x, alford)) -> therefore Convert(briny, alford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The pearline is unattended. The pearline is pyaemic. The pearline salute the apostolos. The pearline salute the robyn. The pearline justify the robyn. The apostolos is multiphase. The apostolos salute the robyn. The apostolos justify the tobias. The tobias intrench the apostolos. The tobias justify the pearline. The tobias justify the robyn. The robyn is bibulous. The robyn is multiphase. The robyn salute the pearline. The robyn salute the tobias. The robyn justify the tobias. If someone salute the apostolos then the apostolos is multiphase. If someone salute the pearline and the pearline salute the robyn then the robyn is pyaemic. If someone is pyaemic then they eat the apostolos. The apostolos does not eat the apostolos.", "logic": "\nUnattended(pearline)\nPyaemic(pearline)\nSalute(pearline, apostolos)\nSalute(pearline, robyn)\nJustify(pearline, robyn)\nMultiphase(apostolos)\nSalute(apostolos, robyn)\nJustify(apostolos, tobias)\nIntrench(tobias, apostolos)\nJustify(tobias, pearline)\nJustify(tobias, robyn)\nBibulous(robyn)\nMultiphase(robyn)\nSalute(robyn, pearline)\nSalute(robyn, tobias)\nJustify(robyn, tobias)\nforall x (Salute(x, apostolos) -> Multiphase(apostolos))\nforall x (Salute(x, pearline) and Salute(pearline, robyn) -> Pyaemic(robyn))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Intrench(x, apostolos))\n\nnot Intrench(apostolos, apostolos)\n\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Intrench(x, apostolos)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The cori is slovakian. The cori is affluent. The cori chemisorb the walker. The cori chemisorb the lia. The cori cultivate the lia. The walker is kingly. The walker chemisorb the lia. The walker cultivate the emanuel. The emanuel ticktack the walker. The emanuel cultivate the cori. The emanuel cultivate the lia. The lia is unheeding. The lia is kingly. The lia chemisorb the cori. The lia chemisorb the emanuel. The lia cultivate the emanuel. If someone chemisorb the walker then the walker is kingly. If someone chemisorb the cori and the cori chemisorb the lia then the lia is affluent. If someone is affluent then they eat the walker. The cori is unheeding.", "logic": "\nSlovakian(cori)\nAffluent(cori)\nChemisorb(cori, walker)\nChemisorb(cori, lia)\nCultivate(cori, lia)\nKingly(walker)\nChemisorb(walker, lia)\nCultivate(walker, emanuel)\nTicktack(emanuel, walker)\nCultivate(emanuel, cori)\nCultivate(emanuel, lia)\nUnheeding(lia)\nKingly(lia)\nChemisorb(lia, cori)\nChemisorb(lia, emanuel)\nCultivate(lia, emanuel)\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, walker) -> Kingly(walker))\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, cori) and Chemisorb(cori, lia) -> Affluent(lia))\nforall x (Affluent(x) -> Ticktack(x, walker))\n\nUnheeding(cori)\n\nUnheeding(cori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The danelle is overland. The danelle is keeled. The danelle mimeograph the georg. The danelle mimeograph the toinette. The danelle taunt the toinette. The georg is revokable. The georg mimeograph the toinette. The georg taunt the vittoria. The vittoria donate the georg. The vittoria taunt the danelle. The vittoria taunt the toinette. The toinette is levantine. The toinette is revokable. The toinette mimeograph the danelle. The toinette mimeograph the vittoria. The toinette taunt the vittoria. If someone mimeograph the georg then the georg is revokable. If someone mimeograph the danelle and the danelle mimeograph the toinette then the toinette is keeled. If someone is keeled then they eat the georg. The toinette does not visit the toinette.", "logic": "\nOverland(danelle)\nKeeled(danelle)\nMimeograph(danelle, georg)\nMimeograph(danelle, toinette)\nTaunt(danelle, toinette)\nRevokable(georg)\nMimeograph(georg, toinette)\nTaunt(georg, vittoria)\nDonate(vittoria, georg)\nTaunt(vittoria, danelle)\nTaunt(vittoria, toinette)\nLevantine(toinette)\nRevokable(toinette)\nMimeograph(toinette, danelle)\nMimeograph(toinette, vittoria)\nTaunt(toinette, vittoria)\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, georg) -> Revokable(georg))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, danelle) and Mimeograph(danelle, toinette) -> Keeled(toinette))\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Donate(x, georg))\n\nnot Taunt(toinette, toinette)\n\nnot Taunt(toinette, toinette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The zachary is pledged. The zachary is beguiling. The zachary splash the cindee. The zachary splash the joana. The zachary rule the joana. The cindee is foiled. The cindee splash the joana. The cindee rule the ethyl. The ethyl trek the cindee. The ethyl rule the zachary. The ethyl rule the joana. The joana is lukewarm. The joana is foiled. The joana splash the zachary. The joana splash the ethyl. The joana rule the ethyl. If someone splash the cindee then the cindee is foiled. If someone splash the zachary and the zachary splash the joana then the joana is beguiling. If someone is beguiling then they eat the cindee. The zachary rule the zachary.", "logic": "\nPledged(zachary)\nBeguiling(zachary)\nSplash(zachary, cindee)\nSplash(zachary, joana)\nRule(zachary, joana)\nFoiled(cindee)\nSplash(cindee, joana)\nRule(cindee, ethyl)\nTrek(ethyl, cindee)\nRule(ethyl, zachary)\nRule(ethyl, joana)\nLukewarm(joana)\nFoiled(joana)\nSplash(joana, zachary)\nSplash(joana, ethyl)\nRule(joana, ethyl)\nforall x (Splash(x, cindee) -> Foiled(cindee))\nforall x (Splash(x, zachary) and Splash(zachary, joana) -> Beguiling(joana))\nforall x (Beguiling(x) -> Trek(x, cindee))\n\nRule(zachary, zachary)\n\nRule(zachary, zachary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The jackson is spanish. The jackson is nonporous. The jackson market the kin. The jackson market the lorri. The jackson chondrify the lorri. The kin is allopatric. The kin market the lorri. The kin chondrify the lydia. The lydia skipper the kin. The lydia chondrify the jackson. The lydia chondrify the lorri. The lorri is fictile. The lorri is allopatric. The lorri market the jackson. The lorri market the lydia. The lorri chondrify the lydia. If someone market the kin then the kin is allopatric. If someone market the jackson and the jackson market the lorri then the lorri is nonporous. If someone is nonporous then they eat the kin. The kin is not nonporous.", "logic": "\nSpanish(jackson)\nNonporous(jackson)\nMarket(jackson, kin)\nMarket(jackson, lorri)\nChondrify(jackson, lorri)\nAllopatric(kin)\nMarket(kin, lorri)\nChondrify(kin, lydia)\nSkipper(lydia, kin)\nChondrify(lydia, jackson)\nChondrify(lydia, lorri)\nFictile(lorri)\nAllopatric(lorri)\nMarket(lorri, jackson)\nMarket(lorri, lydia)\nChondrify(lorri, lydia)\nforall x (Market(x, kin) -> Allopatric(kin))\nforall x (Market(x, jackson) and Market(jackson, lorri) -> Nonporous(lorri))\nforall x (Nonporous(x) -> Skipper(x, kin))\n\nnot Nonporous(kin)\n\nnot Nonporous(kin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The rochelle is hypaethral. The rochelle is boxy. The rochelle dampen the cristabel. The rochelle dampen the pietra. The rochelle program the pietra. The cristabel is marbled. The cristabel dampen the pietra. The cristabel program the lurette. The lurette totalize the cristabel. The lurette program the rochelle. The lurette program the pietra. The pietra is asat. The pietra is marbled. The pietra dampen the rochelle. The pietra dampen the lurette. The pietra program the lurette. If someone dampen the cristabel then the cristabel is marbled. If someone dampen the rochelle and the rochelle dampen the pietra then the pietra is boxy. If someone is boxy then they eat the cristabel. The cristabel is rough.", "logic": "\nHypaethral(rochelle)\nBoxy(rochelle)\nDampen(rochelle, cristabel)\nDampen(rochelle, pietra)\nProgram(rochelle, pietra)\nMarbled(cristabel)\nDampen(cristabel, pietra)\nProgram(cristabel, lurette)\nTotalize(lurette, cristabel)\nProgram(lurette, rochelle)\nProgram(lurette, pietra)\nAsat(pietra)\nMarbled(pietra)\nDampen(pietra, rochelle)\nDampen(pietra, lurette)\nProgram(pietra, lurette)\nforall x (Dampen(x, cristabel) -> Marbled(cristabel))\nforall x (Dampen(x, rochelle) and Dampen(rochelle, pietra) -> Boxy(pietra))\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Totalize(x, cristabel))\n\nRough(cristabel)\n\nRough(cristabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1311"} {"premises": "The marin does not see the salome. The salome lunch the marin. The lesli lunch the marin. The corabelle lunch the salome. If something discount the lesli then it overexert the corabelle. If the corabelle discount the lesli and the lesli overexert the corabelle then the lesli is dishonored. If something lunch the salome then it discount the lesli. If something discount the lesli and the lesli does not need the marin then the lesli lunch the salome. If something lunch the salome then it is dismayed. If something discount the marin and the marin is not dishonored then the marin is tentacular. The marin does not see the salome.", "logic": "\nnot Overexert(marin, salome)\nLunch(salome, marin)\nLunch(lesli, marin)\nLunch(corabelle, salome)\nforall x (Discount(x, lesli) -> Overexert(x, corabelle))\nDiscount(corabelle, lesli) and Overexert(lesli, corabelle) -> Dishonored(lesli)\nforall x (Lunch(x, salome) -> Discount(x, lesli))\nforall x (Discount(x, lesli) and not Discount(lesli, marin) -> Lunch(lesli, salome))\nforall x (Lunch(x, salome) -> Dismayed(x))\nforall x (Discount(x, marin) and not Dishonored(marin) -> Tentacular(marin))\n\nnot Overexert(marin, salome)\n\ntherefore not Overexert(marin, salome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The ertha does not see the anurag. The anurag major the ertha. The koralle major the ertha. The terrie major the anurag. If something spatter the koralle then it tyrannize the terrie. If the terrie spatter the koralle and the koralle tyrannize the terrie then the koralle is stretch. If something major the anurag then it spatter the koralle. If something spatter the koralle and the koralle does not need the ertha then the koralle major the anurag. If something major the anurag then it is abatable. If something spatter the ertha and the ertha is not stretch then the ertha is lxxvi. The anurag does not eat the ertha.", "logic": "\nnot Tyrannize(ertha, anurag)\nMajor(anurag, ertha)\nMajor(koralle, ertha)\nMajor(terrie, anurag)\nforall x (Spatter(x, koralle) -> Tyrannize(x, terrie))\nSpatter(terrie, koralle) and Tyrannize(koralle, terrie) -> Stretch(koralle)\nforall x (Major(x, anurag) -> Spatter(x, koralle))\nforall x (Spatter(x, koralle) and not Spatter(koralle, ertha) -> Major(koralle, anurag))\nforall x (Major(x, anurag) -> Abatable(x))\nforall x (Spatter(x, ertha) and not Stretch(ertha) -> Lxxvi(ertha))\n\nnot Major(anurag, ertha)\n\ntherefore Major(anurag, ertha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The krystal does not see the derron. The derron suck the krystal. The normand suck the krystal. The thorsten suck the derron. If something formalize the normand then it behold the thorsten. If the thorsten formalize the normand and the normand behold the thorsten then the normand is embonpoint. If something suck the derron then it formalize the normand. If something formalize the normand and the normand does not need the krystal then the normand suck the derron. If something suck the derron then it is anosmic. If something formalize the krystal and the krystal is not embonpoint then the krystal is trimotored. The thorsten is anosmic.", "logic": "\nnot Behold(krystal, derron)\nSuck(derron, krystal)\nSuck(normand, krystal)\nSuck(thorsten, derron)\nforall x (Formalize(x, normand) -> Behold(x, thorsten))\nFormalize(thorsten, normand) and Behold(normand, thorsten) -> Embonpoint(normand)\nforall x (Suck(x, derron) -> Formalize(x, normand))\nforall x (Formalize(x, normand) and not Formalize(normand, krystal) -> Suck(normand, derron))\nforall x (Suck(x, derron) -> Anosmic(x))\nforall x (Formalize(x, krystal) and not Embonpoint(krystal) -> Trimotored(krystal))\n\nAnosmic(thorsten)\n\nSuck(thorsten, derron) and forall x (Suck(x, derron) -> Anosmic(x)) -> therefore Anosmic(thorsten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The mella does not see the augustine. The augustine avenge the mella. The worthy avenge the mella. The ann avenge the augustine. If something guess the worthy then it tattle the ann. If the ann guess the worthy and the worthy tattle the ann then the worthy is regnant. If something avenge the augustine then it guess the worthy. If something guess the worthy and the worthy does not need the mella then the worthy avenge the augustine. If something avenge the augustine then it is paltry. If something guess the mella and the mella is not regnant then the mella is frowsty. The ann does not need the worthy.", "logic": "\nnot Tattle(mella, augustine)\nAvenge(augustine, mella)\nAvenge(worthy, mella)\nAvenge(ann, augustine)\nforall x (Guess(x, worthy) -> Tattle(x, ann))\nGuess(ann, worthy) and Tattle(worthy, ann) -> Regnant(worthy)\nforall x (Avenge(x, augustine) -> Guess(x, worthy))\nforall x (Guess(x, worthy) and not Guess(worthy, mella) -> Avenge(worthy, augustine))\nforall x (Avenge(x, augustine) -> Paltry(x))\nforall x (Guess(x, mella) and not Regnant(mella) -> Frowsty(mella))\n\nnot Guess(ann, worthy)\n\nAvenge(ann, augustine) and forall x (Avenge(x, augustine) -> Guess(x, worthy)) -> therefore Guess(ann, worthy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The woodman does not see the mahalia. The mahalia buttress the woodman. The farah buttress the woodman. The madelina buttress the mahalia. If something jest the farah then it martyrize the madelina. If the madelina jest the farah and the farah martyrize the madelina then the farah is ionized. If something buttress the mahalia then it jest the farah. If something jest the farah and the farah does not need the woodman then the farah buttress the mahalia. If something buttress the mahalia then it is untired. If something jest the woodman and the woodman is not ionized then the woodman is infernal. The madelina martyrize the madelina.", "logic": "\nnot Martyrize(woodman, mahalia)\nButtress(mahalia, woodman)\nButtress(farah, woodman)\nButtress(madelina, mahalia)\nforall x (Jest(x, farah) -> Martyrize(x, madelina))\nJest(madelina, farah) and Martyrize(farah, madelina) -> Ionized(farah)\nforall x (Buttress(x, mahalia) -> Jest(x, farah))\nforall x (Jest(x, farah) and not Jest(farah, woodman) -> Buttress(farah, mahalia))\nforall x (Buttress(x, mahalia) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Jest(x, woodman) and not Ionized(woodman) -> Infernal(woodman))\n\nMartyrize(madelina, madelina)\n\nButtress(madelina, mahalia) and forall x (Buttress(x, mahalia) -> Jest(x, farah)) -> therefore Jest(madelina, farah) Jest(madelina, farah) and forall x (Jest(x, farah) -> Martyrize(x, madelina)) -> therefore Martyrize(madelina, madelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The chantal does not see the barnard. The barnard weekend the chantal. The lissie weekend the chantal. The daria weekend the barnard. If something redeploy the lissie then it retransmit the daria. If the daria redeploy the lissie and the lissie retransmit the daria then the lissie is remindful. If something weekend the barnard then it redeploy the lissie. If something redeploy the lissie and the lissie does not need the chantal then the lissie weekend the barnard. If something weekend the barnard then it is galvanic. If something redeploy the chantal and the chantal is not remindful then the chantal is inhumane. The daria does not see the daria.", "logic": "\nnot Retransmit(chantal, barnard)\nWeekend(barnard, chantal)\nWeekend(lissie, chantal)\nWeekend(daria, barnard)\nforall x (Redeploy(x, lissie) -> Retransmit(x, daria))\nRedeploy(daria, lissie) and Retransmit(lissie, daria) -> Remindful(lissie)\nforall x (Weekend(x, barnard) -> Redeploy(x, lissie))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, lissie) and not Redeploy(lissie, chantal) -> Weekend(lissie, barnard))\nforall x (Weekend(x, barnard) -> Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, chantal) and not Remindful(chantal) -> Inhumane(chantal))\n\nnot Retransmit(daria, daria)\n\nWeekend(daria, barnard) and forall x (Weekend(x, barnard) -> Redeploy(x, lissie)) -> therefore Redeploy(daria, lissie) Redeploy(daria, lissie) and forall x (Redeploy(x, lissie) -> Retransmit(x, daria)) -> therefore Retransmit(daria, daria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The clarisa does not see the efram. The efram favor the clarisa. The meghan favor the clarisa. The elvira favor the efram. If something theologize the meghan then it shmooze the elvira. If the elvira theologize the meghan and the meghan shmooze the elvira then the meghan is unwearying. If something favor the efram then it theologize the meghan. If something theologize the meghan and the meghan does not need the clarisa then the meghan favor the efram. If something favor the efram then it is trendy. If something theologize the clarisa and the clarisa is not unwearying then the clarisa is quirky. The clarisa does not need the meghan.", "logic": "\nnot Shmooze(clarisa, efram)\nFavor(efram, clarisa)\nFavor(meghan, clarisa)\nFavor(elvira, efram)\nforall x (Theologize(x, meghan) -> Shmooze(x, elvira))\nTheologize(elvira, meghan) and Shmooze(meghan, elvira) -> Unwearying(meghan)\nforall x (Favor(x, efram) -> Theologize(x, meghan))\nforall x (Theologize(x, meghan) and not Theologize(meghan, clarisa) -> Favor(meghan, efram))\nforall x (Favor(x, efram) -> Trendy(x))\nforall x (Theologize(x, clarisa) and not Unwearying(clarisa) -> Quirky(clarisa))\n\nnot Theologize(clarisa, meghan)\n\nforall x (Favor(x, efram) -> Theologize(x, meghan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The patric does not see the nickolas. The nickolas julienne the patric. The coralyn julienne the patric. The melita julienne the nickolas. If something concur the coralyn then it cocker the melita. If the melita concur the coralyn and the coralyn cocker the melita then the coralyn is venerating. If something julienne the nickolas then it concur the coralyn. If something concur the coralyn and the coralyn does not need the patric then the coralyn julienne the nickolas. If something julienne the nickolas then it is retinal. If something concur the patric and the patric is not venerating then the patric is involved. The coralyn cocker the melita.", "logic": "\nnot Cocker(patric, nickolas)\nJulienne(nickolas, patric)\nJulienne(coralyn, patric)\nJulienne(melita, nickolas)\nforall x (Concur(x, coralyn) -> Cocker(x, melita))\nConcur(melita, coralyn) and Cocker(coralyn, melita) -> Venerating(coralyn)\nforall x (Julienne(x, nickolas) -> Concur(x, coralyn))\nforall x (Concur(x, coralyn) and not Concur(coralyn, patric) -> Julienne(coralyn, nickolas))\nforall x (Julienne(x, nickolas) -> Retinal(x))\nforall x (Concur(x, patric) and not Venerating(patric) -> Involved(patric))\n\nCocker(coralyn, melita)\n\nforall x (Concur(x, coralyn) -> Cocker(x, melita)) <- forall x (Julienne(x, nickolas) -> Concur(x, coralyn)) <- forall x (Concur(x, coralyn) and not Concur(coralyn, patric) -> Julienne(coralyn, nickolas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The lani does not see the emlynn. The emlynn disdain the lani. The vivienne disdain the lani. The stephen disdain the emlynn. If something combat the vivienne then it nourish the stephen. If the stephen combat the vivienne and the vivienne nourish the stephen then the vivienne is unturned. If something disdain the emlynn then it combat the vivienne. If something combat the vivienne and the vivienne does not need the lani then the vivienne disdain the emlynn. If something disdain the emlynn then it is decompound. If something combat the lani and the lani is not unturned then the lani is booming. The vivienne does not eat the emlynn.", "logic": "\nnot Nourish(lani, emlynn)\nDisdain(emlynn, lani)\nDisdain(vivienne, lani)\nDisdain(stephen, emlynn)\nforall x (Combat(x, vivienne) -> Nourish(x, stephen))\nCombat(stephen, vivienne) and Nourish(vivienne, stephen) -> Unturned(vivienne)\nforall x (Disdain(x, emlynn) -> Combat(x, vivienne))\nforall x (Combat(x, vivienne) and not Combat(vivienne, lani) -> Disdain(vivienne, emlynn))\nforall x (Disdain(x, emlynn) -> Decompound(x))\nforall x (Combat(x, lani) and not Unturned(lani) -> Booming(lani))\n\nnot Disdain(vivienne, emlynn)\n\nforall x (Combat(x, vivienne) and not Combat(vivienne, lani) -> Disdain(vivienne, emlynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The pansy does not see the rockwell. The rockwell desquamate the pansy. The bogdan desquamate the pansy. The urban desquamate the rockwell. If something destine the bogdan then it swoosh the urban. If the urban destine the bogdan and the bogdan swoosh the urban then the bogdan is ignitable. If something desquamate the rockwell then it destine the bogdan. If something destine the bogdan and the bogdan does not need the pansy then the bogdan desquamate the rockwell. If something desquamate the rockwell then it is libertine. If something destine the pansy and the pansy is not ignitable then the pansy is leathery. The bogdan is leathery.", "logic": "\nnot Swoosh(pansy, rockwell)\nDesquamate(rockwell, pansy)\nDesquamate(bogdan, pansy)\nDesquamate(urban, rockwell)\nforall x (Destine(x, bogdan) -> Swoosh(x, urban))\nDestine(urban, bogdan) and Swoosh(bogdan, urban) -> Ignitable(bogdan)\nforall x (Desquamate(x, rockwell) -> Destine(x, bogdan))\nforall x (Destine(x, bogdan) and not Destine(bogdan, pansy) -> Desquamate(bogdan, rockwell))\nforall x (Desquamate(x, rockwell) -> Libertine(x))\nforall x (Destine(x, pansy) and not Ignitable(pansy) -> Leathery(pansy))\n\nLeathery(bogdan)\n\nLeathery(bogdan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The wynny does not see the fannie. The fannie jactitate the wynny. The alane jactitate the wynny. The shellie jactitate the fannie. If something dumbfound the alane then it misdemean the shellie. If the shellie dumbfound the alane and the alane misdemean the shellie then the alane is diestrual. If something jactitate the fannie then it dumbfound the alane. If something dumbfound the alane and the alane does not need the wynny then the alane jactitate the fannie. If something jactitate the fannie then it is forced. If something dumbfound the wynny and the wynny is not diestrual then the wynny is pressor. The fannie is not diestrual.", "logic": "\nnot Misdemean(wynny, fannie)\nJactitate(fannie, wynny)\nJactitate(alane, wynny)\nJactitate(shellie, fannie)\nforall x (Dumbfound(x, alane) -> Misdemean(x, shellie))\nDumbfound(shellie, alane) and Misdemean(alane, shellie) -> Diestrual(alane)\nforall x (Jactitate(x, fannie) -> Dumbfound(x, alane))\nforall x (Dumbfound(x, alane) and not Dumbfound(alane, wynny) -> Jactitate(alane, fannie))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, fannie) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Dumbfound(x, wynny) and not Diestrual(wynny) -> Pressor(wynny))\n\nnot Diestrual(fannie)\n\nnot Diestrual(fannie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The kelli does not see the jessalin. The jessalin squawk the kelli. The maddie squawk the kelli. The ernesta squawk the jessalin. If something right the maddie then it shank the ernesta. If the ernesta right the maddie and the maddie shank the ernesta then the maddie is adorable. If something squawk the jessalin then it right the maddie. If something right the maddie and the maddie does not need the kelli then the maddie squawk the jessalin. If something squawk the jessalin then it is popliteal. If something right the kelli and the kelli is not adorable then the kelli is expectant. The jessalin shank the kelli.", "logic": "\nnot Shank(kelli, jessalin)\nSquawk(jessalin, kelli)\nSquawk(maddie, kelli)\nSquawk(ernesta, jessalin)\nforall x (Right(x, maddie) -> Shank(x, ernesta))\nRight(ernesta, maddie) and Shank(maddie, ernesta) -> Adorable(maddie)\nforall x (Squawk(x, jessalin) -> Right(x, maddie))\nforall x (Right(x, maddie) and not Right(maddie, kelli) -> Squawk(maddie, jessalin))\nforall x (Squawk(x, jessalin) -> Popliteal(x))\nforall x (Right(x, kelli) and not Adorable(kelli) -> Expectant(kelli))\n\nShank(jessalin, kelli)\n\nShank(jessalin, kelli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-909"} {"premises": "The urban is planar. The urban is addled. The urban is scaleless. The urban is hymeneal. The urban is overawed. The urban source the derrek. The urban stand the derrek. The urban disincline the derrek. The derrek is planar. The derrek is addled. The derrek is hymeneal. The derrek is overawed. The derrek source the urban. The derrek stand the urban. The derrek disincline the urban. If something disincline the derrek and the derrek stand the urban then it stand the derrek. If something is hymeneal and it stand the derrek then it is scaleless. If something is addled and planar then it disincline the derrek. If something source the urban then it stand the urban. If something source the urban then the urban disincline the derrek. If something is addled and it stand the urban then the urban source the derrek. If something is hymeneal then it disincline the derrek. If something is hymeneal and it disincline the urban then it is planar. The derrek is hymeneal.", "logic": "\nPlanar(urban)\nAddled(urban)\nScaleless(urban)\nHymeneal(urban)\nOverawed(urban)\nSource(urban, derrek)\nStand(urban, derrek)\nDisincline(urban, derrek)\nPlanar(derrek)\nAddled(derrek)\nHymeneal(derrek)\nOverawed(derrek)\nSource(derrek, urban)\nStand(derrek, urban)\nDisincline(derrek, urban)\nforall x (Disincline(x, derrek) and Stand(derrek, urban) -> Stand(x, derrek))\nforall x (Hymeneal(x) and Stand(x, derrek) -> Scaleless(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) and Planar(x) -> Disincline(x, derrek))\nforall x (Source(x, urban) -> Stand(x, urban))\nforall x (Source(x, urban) -> Disincline(urban, derrek))\nforall x (Addled(x) and Stand(x, urban) -> Source(urban, derrek))\nforall x (Hymeneal(x) -> Disincline(x, derrek))\nforall x (Hymeneal(x) and Disincline(x, urban) -> Planar(x))\n\nHymeneal(derrek)\n\ntherefore Hymeneal(derrek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The orton is favourable. The orton is acquainted. The orton is writhed. The orton is aldermanly. The orton is heatable. The orton machinate the laetitia. The orton free the laetitia. The orton occupy the laetitia. The laetitia is favourable. The laetitia is acquainted. The laetitia is aldermanly. The laetitia is heatable. The laetitia machinate the orton. The laetitia free the orton. The laetitia occupy the orton. If something occupy the laetitia and the laetitia free the orton then it free the laetitia. If something is aldermanly and it free the laetitia then it is writhed. If something is acquainted and favourable then it occupy the laetitia. If something machinate the orton then it free the orton. If something machinate the orton then the orton occupy the laetitia. If something is acquainted and it free the orton then the orton machinate the laetitia. If something is aldermanly then it occupy the laetitia. If something is aldermanly and it occupy the orton then it is favourable. The laetitia does not see the orton.", "logic": "\nFavourable(orton)\nAcquainted(orton)\nWrithed(orton)\nAldermanly(orton)\nHeatable(orton)\nMachinate(orton, laetitia)\nFree(orton, laetitia)\nOccupy(orton, laetitia)\nFavourable(laetitia)\nAcquainted(laetitia)\nAldermanly(laetitia)\nHeatable(laetitia)\nMachinate(laetitia, orton)\nFree(laetitia, orton)\nOccupy(laetitia, orton)\nforall x (Occupy(x, laetitia) and Free(laetitia, orton) -> Free(x, laetitia))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) and Free(x, laetitia) -> Writhed(x))\nforall x (Acquainted(x) and Favourable(x) -> Occupy(x, laetitia))\nforall x (Machinate(x, orton) -> Free(x, orton))\nforall x (Machinate(x, orton) -> Occupy(orton, laetitia))\nforall x (Acquainted(x) and Free(x, orton) -> Machinate(orton, laetitia))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Occupy(x, laetitia))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) and Occupy(x, orton) -> Favourable(x))\n\nnot Free(laetitia, orton)\n\ntherefore Free(laetitia, orton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The robert is eleventh. The robert is pecuniary. The robert is prompt. The robert is scaleless. The robert is collective. The robert scold the augustine. The robert swinge the augustine. The robert agnise the augustine. The augustine is eleventh. The augustine is pecuniary. The augustine is scaleless. The augustine is collective. The augustine scold the robert. The augustine swinge the robert. The augustine agnise the robert. If something agnise the augustine and the augustine swinge the robert then it swinge the augustine. If something is scaleless and it swinge the augustine then it is prompt. If something is pecuniary and eleventh then it agnise the augustine. If something scold the robert then it swinge the robert. If something scold the robert then the robert agnise the augustine. If something is pecuniary and it swinge the robert then the robert scold the augustine. If something is scaleless then it agnise the augustine. If something is scaleless and it agnise the robert then it is eleventh. The augustine agnise the augustine.", "logic": "\nEleventh(robert)\nPecuniary(robert)\nPrompt(robert)\nScaleless(robert)\nCollective(robert)\nScold(robert, augustine)\nSwinge(robert, augustine)\nAgnise(robert, augustine)\nEleventh(augustine)\nPecuniary(augustine)\nScaleless(augustine)\nCollective(augustine)\nScold(augustine, robert)\nSwinge(augustine, robert)\nAgnise(augustine, robert)\nforall x (Agnise(x, augustine) and Swinge(augustine, robert) -> Swinge(x, augustine))\nforall x (Scaleless(x) and Swinge(x, augustine) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Pecuniary(x) and Eleventh(x) -> Agnise(x, augustine))\nforall x (Scold(x, robert) -> Swinge(x, robert))\nforall x (Scold(x, robert) -> Agnise(robert, augustine))\nforall x (Pecuniary(x) and Swinge(x, robert) -> Scold(robert, augustine))\nforall x (Scaleless(x) -> Agnise(x, augustine))\nforall x (Scaleless(x) and Agnise(x, robert) -> Eleventh(x))\n\nAgnise(augustine, augustine)\n\nScaleless(augustine) and forall x (Scaleless(x) -> Agnise(x, augustine)) -> therefore Agnise(augustine, augustine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The wendell is practiced. The wendell is sewn. The wendell is platelike. The wendell is newsless. The wendell is nonionised. The wendell lodge the glorianna. The wendell intone the glorianna. The wendell enforce the glorianna. The glorianna is practiced. The glorianna is sewn. The glorianna is newsless. The glorianna is nonionised. The glorianna lodge the wendell. The glorianna intone the wendell. The glorianna enforce the wendell. If something enforce the glorianna and the glorianna intone the wendell then it intone the glorianna. If something is newsless and it intone the glorianna then it is platelike. If something is sewn and practiced then it enforce the glorianna. If something lodge the wendell then it intone the wendell. If something lodge the wendell then the wendell enforce the glorianna. If something is sewn and it intone the wendell then the wendell lodge the glorianna. If something is newsless then it enforce the glorianna. If something is newsless and it enforce the wendell then it is practiced. The glorianna does not visit the glorianna.", "logic": "\nPracticed(wendell)\nSewn(wendell)\nPlatelike(wendell)\nNewsless(wendell)\nNonionised(wendell)\nLodge(wendell, glorianna)\nIntone(wendell, glorianna)\nEnforce(wendell, glorianna)\nPracticed(glorianna)\nSewn(glorianna)\nNewsless(glorianna)\nNonionised(glorianna)\nLodge(glorianna, wendell)\nIntone(glorianna, wendell)\nEnforce(glorianna, wendell)\nforall x (Enforce(x, glorianna) and Intone(glorianna, wendell) -> Intone(x, glorianna))\nforall x (Newsless(x) and Intone(x, glorianna) -> Platelike(x))\nforall x (Sewn(x) and Practiced(x) -> Enforce(x, glorianna))\nforall x (Lodge(x, wendell) -> Intone(x, wendell))\nforall x (Lodge(x, wendell) -> Enforce(wendell, glorianna))\nforall x (Sewn(x) and Intone(x, wendell) -> Lodge(wendell, glorianna))\nforall x (Newsless(x) -> Enforce(x, glorianna))\nforall x (Newsless(x) and Enforce(x, wendell) -> Practiced(x))\n\nnot Enforce(glorianna, glorianna)\n\nNewsless(glorianna) and forall x (Newsless(x) -> Enforce(x, glorianna)) -> therefore Enforce(glorianna, glorianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The linn is batwing. The linn is plantal. The linn is monandrous. The linn is armenian. The linn is hourly. The linn mistime the nadine. The linn achieve the nadine. The linn scorch the nadine. The nadine is batwing. The nadine is plantal. The nadine is armenian. The nadine is hourly. The nadine mistime the linn. The nadine achieve the linn. The nadine scorch the linn. If something scorch the nadine and the nadine achieve the linn then it achieve the nadine. If something is armenian and it achieve the nadine then it is monandrous. If something is plantal and batwing then it scorch the nadine. If something mistime the linn then it achieve the linn. If something mistime the linn then the linn scorch the nadine. If something is plantal and it achieve the linn then the linn mistime the nadine. If something is armenian then it scorch the nadine. If something is armenian and it scorch the linn then it is batwing. The nadine achieve the nadine.", "logic": "\nBatwing(linn)\nPlantal(linn)\nMonandrous(linn)\nArmenian(linn)\nHourly(linn)\nMistime(linn, nadine)\nAchieve(linn, nadine)\nScorch(linn, nadine)\nBatwing(nadine)\nPlantal(nadine)\nArmenian(nadine)\nHourly(nadine)\nMistime(nadine, linn)\nAchieve(nadine, linn)\nScorch(nadine, linn)\nforall x (Scorch(x, nadine) and Achieve(nadine, linn) -> Achieve(x, nadine))\nforall x (Armenian(x) and Achieve(x, nadine) -> Monandrous(x))\nforall x (Plantal(x) and Batwing(x) -> Scorch(x, nadine))\nforall x (Mistime(x, linn) -> Achieve(x, linn))\nforall x (Mistime(x, linn) -> Scorch(linn, nadine))\nforall x (Plantal(x) and Achieve(x, linn) -> Mistime(linn, nadine))\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> Scorch(x, nadine))\nforall x (Armenian(x) and Scorch(x, linn) -> Batwing(x))\n\nAchieve(nadine, nadine)\n\nArmenian(nadine) and forall x (Armenian(x) -> Scorch(x, nadine)) -> therefore Scorch(nadine, nadine) Scorch(nadine, nadine) and Achieve(nadine, linn) and forall x (Scorch(x, nadine) and Achieve(nadine, linn) -> Achieve(x, nadine)) -> therefore Achieve(nadine, nadine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The caren is ranging. The caren is fossil. The caren is prize. The caren is suppressed. The caren is mandean. The caren squat the glynda. The caren uncork the glynda. The caren poll the glynda. The glynda is ranging. The glynda is fossil. The glynda is suppressed. The glynda is mandean. The glynda squat the caren. The glynda uncork the caren. The glynda poll the caren. If something poll the glynda and the glynda uncork the caren then it uncork the glynda. If something is suppressed and it uncork the glynda then it is prize. If something is fossil and ranging then it poll the glynda. If something squat the caren then it uncork the caren. If something squat the caren then the caren poll the glynda. If something is fossil and it uncork the caren then the caren squat the glynda. If something is suppressed then it poll the glynda. If something is suppressed and it poll the caren then it is ranging. The glynda does not see the glynda.", "logic": "\nRanging(caren)\nFossil(caren)\nPrize(caren)\nSuppressed(caren)\nMandean(caren)\nSquat(caren, glynda)\nUncork(caren, glynda)\nPoll(caren, glynda)\nRanging(glynda)\nFossil(glynda)\nSuppressed(glynda)\nMandean(glynda)\nSquat(glynda, caren)\nUncork(glynda, caren)\nPoll(glynda, caren)\nforall x (Poll(x, glynda) and Uncork(glynda, caren) -> Uncork(x, glynda))\nforall x (Suppressed(x) and Uncork(x, glynda) -> Prize(x))\nforall x (Fossil(x) and Ranging(x) -> Poll(x, glynda))\nforall x (Squat(x, caren) -> Uncork(x, caren))\nforall x (Squat(x, caren) -> Poll(caren, glynda))\nforall x (Fossil(x) and Uncork(x, caren) -> Squat(caren, glynda))\nforall x (Suppressed(x) -> Poll(x, glynda))\nforall x (Suppressed(x) and Poll(x, caren) -> Ranging(x))\n\nnot Uncork(glynda, glynda)\n\nSuppressed(glynda) and forall x (Suppressed(x) -> Poll(x, glynda)) -> therefore Poll(glynda, glynda) Poll(glynda, glynda) and Uncork(glynda, caren) and forall x (Poll(x, glynda) and Uncork(glynda, caren) -> Uncork(x, glynda)) -> therefore Uncork(glynda, glynda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The prudi is huffish. The prudi is rustling. The prudi is seventeen. The prudi is aboulic. The prudi is bondable. The prudi cache the hollyanne. The prudi reread the hollyanne. The prudi limp the hollyanne. The hollyanne is huffish. The hollyanne is rustling. The hollyanne is aboulic. The hollyanne is bondable. The hollyanne cache the prudi. The hollyanne reread the prudi. The hollyanne limp the prudi. If something limp the hollyanne and the hollyanne reread the prudi then it reread the hollyanne. If something is aboulic and it reread the hollyanne then it is seventeen. If something is rustling and huffish then it limp the hollyanne. If something cache the prudi then it reread the prudi. If something cache the prudi then the prudi limp the hollyanne. If something is rustling and it reread the prudi then the prudi cache the hollyanne. If something is aboulic then it limp the hollyanne. If something is aboulic and it limp the prudi then it is huffish. The prudi does not see the prudi.", "logic": "\nHuffish(prudi)\nRustling(prudi)\nSeventeen(prudi)\nAboulic(prudi)\nBondable(prudi)\nCache(prudi, hollyanne)\nReread(prudi, hollyanne)\nLimp(prudi, hollyanne)\nHuffish(hollyanne)\nRustling(hollyanne)\nAboulic(hollyanne)\nBondable(hollyanne)\nCache(hollyanne, prudi)\nReread(hollyanne, prudi)\nLimp(hollyanne, prudi)\nforall x (Limp(x, hollyanne) and Reread(hollyanne, prudi) -> Reread(x, hollyanne))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) and Reread(x, hollyanne) -> Seventeen(x))\nforall x (Rustling(x) and Huffish(x) -> Limp(x, hollyanne))\nforall x (Cache(x, prudi) -> Reread(x, prudi))\nforall x (Cache(x, prudi) -> Limp(prudi, hollyanne))\nforall x (Rustling(x) and Reread(x, prudi) -> Cache(prudi, hollyanne))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Limp(x, hollyanne))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) and Limp(x, prudi) -> Huffish(x))\n\nnot Reread(prudi, prudi)\n\nforall x (Cache(x, prudi) -> Reread(x, prudi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The gunter is oversexed. The gunter is colonial. The gunter is foppish. The gunter is covetous. The gunter is hoary. The gunter whitewash the selma. The gunter keep the selma. The gunter demote the selma. The selma is oversexed. The selma is colonial. The selma is covetous. The selma is hoary. The selma whitewash the gunter. The selma keep the gunter. The selma demote the gunter. If something demote the selma and the selma keep the gunter then it keep the selma. If something is covetous and it keep the selma then it is foppish. If something is colonial and oversexed then it demote the selma. If something whitewash the gunter then it keep the gunter. If something whitewash the gunter then the gunter demote the selma. If something is colonial and it keep the gunter then the gunter whitewash the selma. If something is covetous then it demote the selma. If something is covetous and it demote the gunter then it is oversexed. The gunter demote the gunter.", "logic": "\nOversexed(gunter)\nColonial(gunter)\nFoppish(gunter)\nCovetous(gunter)\nHoary(gunter)\nWhitewash(gunter, selma)\nKeep(gunter, selma)\nDemote(gunter, selma)\nOversexed(selma)\nColonial(selma)\nCovetous(selma)\nHoary(selma)\nWhitewash(selma, gunter)\nKeep(selma, gunter)\nDemote(selma, gunter)\nforall x (Demote(x, selma) and Keep(selma, gunter) -> Keep(x, selma))\nforall x (Covetous(x) and Keep(x, selma) -> Foppish(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) and Oversexed(x) -> Demote(x, selma))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, gunter) -> Keep(x, gunter))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, gunter) -> Demote(gunter, selma))\nforall x (Colonial(x) and Keep(x, gunter) -> Whitewash(gunter, selma))\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> Demote(x, selma))\nforall x (Covetous(x) and Demote(x, gunter) -> Oversexed(x))\n\nDemote(gunter, gunter)\n\nDemote(gunter, gunter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The yovonnda is chicken. The yovonnda is outback. The yovonnda is dirty. The yovonnda is bookable. The yovonnda is xlviii. The yovonnda plate the davey. The yovonnda disinter the davey. The yovonnda study the davey. The davey is chicken. The davey is outback. The davey is bookable. The davey is xlviii. The davey plate the yovonnda. The davey disinter the yovonnda. The davey study the yovonnda. If something study the davey and the davey disinter the yovonnda then it disinter the davey. If something is bookable and it disinter the davey then it is dirty. If something is outback and chicken then it study the davey. If something plate the yovonnda then it disinter the yovonnda. If something plate the yovonnda then the yovonnda study the davey. If something is outback and it disinter the yovonnda then the yovonnda plate the davey. If something is bookable then it study the davey. If something is bookable and it study the yovonnda then it is chicken. The davey does not like the davey.", "logic": "\nChicken(yovonnda)\nOutback(yovonnda)\nDirty(yovonnda)\nBookable(yovonnda)\nXlviii(yovonnda)\nPlate(yovonnda, davey)\nDisinter(yovonnda, davey)\nStudy(yovonnda, davey)\nChicken(davey)\nOutback(davey)\nBookable(davey)\nXlviii(davey)\nPlate(davey, yovonnda)\nDisinter(davey, yovonnda)\nStudy(davey, yovonnda)\nforall x (Study(x, davey) and Disinter(davey, yovonnda) -> Disinter(x, davey))\nforall x (Bookable(x) and Disinter(x, davey) -> Dirty(x))\nforall x (Outback(x) and Chicken(x) -> Study(x, davey))\nforall x (Plate(x, yovonnda) -> Disinter(x, yovonnda))\nforall x (Plate(x, yovonnda) -> Study(yovonnda, davey))\nforall x (Outback(x) and Disinter(x, yovonnda) -> Plate(yovonnda, davey))\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Study(x, davey))\nforall x (Bookable(x) and Study(x, yovonnda) -> Chicken(x))\n\nnot Plate(davey, davey)\n\nnot Plate(davey, davey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "The fidelity is treed. The fidelity is impervious. The fidelity is leaved. The fidelity is catchy. The fidelity is thriving. The fidelity retick the shoshana. The fidelity nourish the shoshana. The fidelity restate the shoshana. The shoshana is treed. The shoshana is impervious. The shoshana is catchy. The shoshana is thriving. The shoshana retick the fidelity. The shoshana nourish the fidelity. The shoshana restate the fidelity. If something restate the shoshana and the shoshana nourish the fidelity then it nourish the shoshana. If something is catchy and it nourish the shoshana then it is leaved. If something is impervious and treed then it restate the shoshana. If something retick the fidelity then it nourish the fidelity. If something retick the fidelity then the fidelity restate the shoshana. If something is impervious and it nourish the fidelity then the fidelity retick the shoshana. If something is catchy then it restate the shoshana. If something is catchy and it restate the fidelity then it is treed. The fidelity retick the fidelity.", "logic": "\nTreed(fidelity)\nImpervious(fidelity)\nLeaved(fidelity)\nCatchy(fidelity)\nThriving(fidelity)\nRetick(fidelity, shoshana)\nNourish(fidelity, shoshana)\nRestate(fidelity, shoshana)\nTreed(shoshana)\nImpervious(shoshana)\nCatchy(shoshana)\nThriving(shoshana)\nRetick(shoshana, fidelity)\nNourish(shoshana, fidelity)\nRestate(shoshana, fidelity)\nforall x (Restate(x, shoshana) and Nourish(shoshana, fidelity) -> Nourish(x, shoshana))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and Nourish(x, shoshana) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Impervious(x) and Treed(x) -> Restate(x, shoshana))\nforall x (Retick(x, fidelity) -> Nourish(x, fidelity))\nforall x (Retick(x, fidelity) -> Restate(fidelity, shoshana))\nforall x (Impervious(x) and Nourish(x, fidelity) -> Retick(fidelity, shoshana))\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Restate(x, shoshana))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and Restate(x, fidelity) -> Treed(x))\n\nRetick(fidelity, fidelity)\n\nRetick(fidelity, fidelity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-75"} {"premises": "Glennis is unruly. Anais is brute. Hayden is recurrent. Joe is unruly. If something is recurrent then it is unruly. If something is unruly then it is unmannered. Big things are dented. Joe is unruly.", "logic": "\nUnruly(glennis)\nBrute(anais)\nRecurrent(hayden)\nUnruly(joe)\nforall x (Recurrent(x) -> Unruly(x))\nforall x (Unruly(x) -> Unmannered(x))\nforall x (Recurrent(x) -> Dented(x))\n\nUnruly(joe)\n\ntherefore Unruly(joe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Merwin is shirty. Aidan is tanzanian. Artur is messy. Aubree is shirty. If something is messy then it is shirty. If something is shirty then it is aligned. Big things are slanted. Aidan is not tanzanian.", "logic": "\nShirty(merwin)\nTanzanian(aidan)\nMessy(artur)\nShirty(aubree)\nforall x (Messy(x) -> Shirty(x))\nforall x (Shirty(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Messy(x) -> Slanted(x))\n\nnot Tanzanian(aidan)\n\ntherefore Tanzanian(aidan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Jerrylee is rightful. Genevra is odourless. Fraser is imperative. Aurea is rightful. If something is imperative then it is rightful. If something is rightful then it is floaty. Big things are chesty. Jerrylee is floaty.", "logic": "\nRightful(jerrylee)\nOdourless(genevra)\nImperative(fraser)\nRightful(aurea)\nforall x (Imperative(x) -> Rightful(x))\nforall x (Rightful(x) -> Floaty(x))\nforall x (Imperative(x) -> Chesty(x))\n\nFloaty(jerrylee)\n\nRightful(jerrylee) and forall x (Rightful(x) -> Floaty(x)) -> therefore Floaty(jerrylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Letitia is inventive. Yankee is normal. Godfrey is unrewarded. Denise is inventive. If something is unrewarded then it is inventive. If something is inventive then it is drizzly. Big things are dotty. Letitia is not drizzly.", "logic": "\nInventive(letitia)\nNormal(yankee)\nUnrewarded(godfrey)\nInventive(denise)\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Inventive(x))\nforall x (Inventive(x) -> Drizzly(x))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Dotty(x))\n\nnot Drizzly(letitia)\n\nInventive(letitia) and forall x (Inventive(x) -> Drizzly(x)) -> therefore Drizzly(letitia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Codee is fell. Libbey is dietetic. Hans is onshore. Norean is fell. If something is onshore then it is fell. If something is fell then it is strait. Big things are stoneless. Hans is strait.", "logic": "\nFell(codee)\nDietetic(libbey)\nOnshore(hans)\nFell(norean)\nforall x (Onshore(x) -> Fell(x))\nforall x (Fell(x) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Onshore(x) -> Stoneless(x))\n\nStrait(hans)\n\nOnshore(hans) and forall x (Onshore(x) -> Fell(x)) -> therefore Fell(hans) Fell(hans) and forall x (Fell(x) -> Strait(x)) -> therefore Strait(hans)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Rozalin is nineteen. Kiele is propellant. Christine is wacky. Seline is nineteen. If something is wacky then it is nineteen. If something is nineteen then it is vibrant. Big things are weaponless. Christine is not vibrant.", "logic": "\nNineteen(rozalin)\nPropellant(kiele)\nWacky(christine)\nNineteen(seline)\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Nineteen(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) -> Vibrant(x))\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Weaponless(x))\n\nnot Vibrant(christine)\n\nWacky(christine) and forall x (Wacky(x) -> Nineteen(x)) -> therefore Nineteen(christine) Nineteen(christine) and forall x (Nineteen(x) -> Vibrant(x)) -> therefore Vibrant(christine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Marcio is voteless. Kenn is monstrous. Jillayne is gnomic. Trevar is voteless. If something is gnomic then it is voteless. If something is voteless then it is anorectal. Big things are lethargic. Marcio is not lethargic.", "logic": "\nVoteless(marcio)\nMonstrous(kenn)\nGnomic(jillayne)\nVoteless(trevar)\nforall x (Gnomic(x) -> Voteless(x))\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Gnomic(x) -> Lethargic(x))\n\nnot Lethargic(marcio)\n\nforall x (Gnomic(x) -> Lethargic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Pacifica is uniparous. Annabelle is screwball. Charmain is bored. Appolonia is uniparous. If something is bored then it is uniparous. If something is uniparous then it is chubby. Big things are vagrant. Annabelle is vagrant.", "logic": "\nUniparous(pacifica)\nScrewball(annabelle)\nBored(charmain)\nUniparous(appolonia)\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Uniparous(x) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Vagrant(x))\n\nVagrant(annabelle)\n\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Vagrant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Giovanni is butyric. Henrik is secondary. Phelia is freehanded. Rayshell is butyric. If something is freehanded then it is butyric. If something is butyric then it is groping. Big things are future. Rayshell is not future.", "logic": "\nButyric(giovanni)\nSecondary(henrik)\nFreehanded(phelia)\nButyric(rayshell)\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) -> Groping(x))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Future(x))\n\nnot Future(rayshell)\n\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Future(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Matthiew is total. Krysta is calcitic. Harland is articulary. Adriaens is total. If something is articulary then it is total. If something is total then it is biting. Big things are signal. Harland is calcitic.", "logic": "\nTotal(matthiew)\nCalcitic(krysta)\nArticulary(harland)\nTotal(adriaens)\nforall x (Articulary(x) -> Total(x))\nforall x (Total(x) -> Biting(x))\nforall x (Articulary(x) -> Signal(x))\n\nCalcitic(harland)\n\nCalcitic(harland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Hewitt is allotropic. Yalonda is corymbose. Davis is nappy. Lida is allotropic. If something is nappy then it is allotropic. If something is allotropic then it is monovalent. Big things are olfactive. Davis is not round.", "logic": "\nAllotropic(hewitt)\nCorymbose(yalonda)\nNappy(davis)\nAllotropic(lida)\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Allotropic(x))\nforall x (Allotropic(x) -> Monovalent(x))\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Olfactive(x))\n\nnot Round(davis)\n\nnot Round(davis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Nanni is unshaved. Valdemar is arching. Kamila is cuban. Davon is unshaved. If something is cuban then it is unshaved. If something is unshaved then it is perfidious. Big things are tested. Valdemar is kind.", "logic": "\nUnshaved(nanni)\nArching(valdemar)\nCuban(kamila)\nUnshaved(davon)\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Unshaved(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Perfidious(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Tested(x))\n\nKind(valdemar)\n\nKind(valdemar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1891"} {"premises": "Pauline is coagulable. Pauline is madcap. Lorraine is changing. Lorraine is coagulable. Lorraine is gallant. Lorraine is madcap. Lorraine is aliphatic. Lorraine is pursued. Emmanuel is gallant. Emmanuel is pursued. If Emmanuel is coagulable then Emmanuel is madcap. If something is pursued then it is coagulable. Pauline is coagulable.", "logic": "\nCoagulable(pauline)\nMadcap(pauline)\nChanging(lorraine)\nCoagulable(lorraine)\nGallant(lorraine)\nMadcap(lorraine)\nAliphatic(lorraine)\nPursued(lorraine)\nGallant(emmanuel)\nPursued(emmanuel)\nCoagulable(emmanuel) -> Madcap(emmanuel)\nforall x (Pursued(x) -> Coagulable(x))\n\nCoagulable(pauline)\n\ntherefore Coagulable(pauline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Jaine is lewd. Jaine is recreant. Jon is humourless. Jon is lewd. Jon is illative. Jon is recreant. Jon is undynamic. Jon is rutted. Rolando is illative. Rolando is rutted. If Rolando is lewd then Rolando is recreant. If something is rutted then it is lewd. Jon is not humourless.", "logic": "\nLewd(jaine)\nRecreant(jaine)\nHumourless(jon)\nLewd(jon)\nIllative(jon)\nRecreant(jon)\nUndynamic(jon)\nRutted(jon)\nIllative(rolando)\nRutted(rolando)\nLewd(rolando) -> Recreant(rolando)\nforall x (Rutted(x) -> Lewd(x))\n\nnot Humourless(jon)\n\ntherefore Humourless(jon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Rem is pastelike. Rem is bungaloid. Fonsie is cornish. Fonsie is pastelike. Fonsie is meltable. Fonsie is bungaloid. Fonsie is podgy. Fonsie is dished. Micki is meltable. Micki is dished. If Micki is pastelike then Micki is bungaloid. If something is dished then it is pastelike. Micki is pastelike.", "logic": "\nPastelike(rem)\nBungaloid(rem)\nCornish(fonsie)\nPastelike(fonsie)\nMeltable(fonsie)\nBungaloid(fonsie)\nPodgy(fonsie)\nDished(fonsie)\nMeltable(micki)\nDished(micki)\nPastelike(micki) -> Bungaloid(micki)\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Pastelike(x))\n\nPastelike(micki)\n\nDished(micki) and forall x (Dished(x) -> Pastelike(x)) -> therefore Pastelike(micki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Nancy is endozoic. Nancy is outsize. Sylvia is lacklustre. Sylvia is endozoic. Sylvia is fuzzed. Sylvia is outsize. Sylvia is meaningful. Sylvia is collinear. Lorry is fuzzed. Lorry is collinear. If Lorry is endozoic then Lorry is outsize. If something is collinear then it is endozoic. Lorry is not endozoic.", "logic": "\nEndozoic(nancy)\nOutsize(nancy)\nLacklustre(sylvia)\nEndozoic(sylvia)\nFuzzed(sylvia)\nOutsize(sylvia)\nMeaningful(sylvia)\nCollinear(sylvia)\nFuzzed(lorry)\nCollinear(lorry)\nEndozoic(lorry) -> Outsize(lorry)\nforall x (Collinear(x) -> Endozoic(x))\n\nnot Endozoic(lorry)\n\nCollinear(lorry) and forall x (Collinear(x) -> Endozoic(x)) -> therefore Endozoic(lorry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Belinda is heraldic. Belinda is deadening. Merola is corrupted. Merola is heraldic. Merola is manual. Merola is deadening. Merola is specific. Merola is acerose. Rhiamon is manual. Rhiamon is acerose. If Rhiamon is heraldic then Rhiamon is deadening. If something is acerose then it is heraldic. Rhiamon is deadening.", "logic": "\nHeraldic(belinda)\nDeadening(belinda)\nCorrupted(merola)\nHeraldic(merola)\nManual(merola)\nDeadening(merola)\nSpecific(merola)\nAcerose(merola)\nManual(rhiamon)\nAcerose(rhiamon)\nHeraldic(rhiamon) -> Deadening(rhiamon)\nforall x (Acerose(x) -> Heraldic(x))\n\nDeadening(rhiamon)\n\nAcerose(rhiamon) and forall x (Acerose(x) -> Heraldic(x)) -> therefore Heraldic(rhiamon) Heraldic(rhiamon) and Heraldic(rhiamon) -> Deadening(rhiamon) -> therefore Deadening(rhiamon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Templeton is peritoneal. Templeton is footless. Elyn is pinnate. Elyn is peritoneal. Elyn is unsalaried. Elyn is footless. Elyn is newborn. Elyn is fallen. Sharline is unsalaried. Sharline is fallen. If Sharline is peritoneal then Sharline is footless. If something is fallen then it is peritoneal. Sharline is not footless.", "logic": "\nPeritoneal(templeton)\nFootless(templeton)\nPinnate(elyn)\nPeritoneal(elyn)\nUnsalaried(elyn)\nFootless(elyn)\nNewborn(elyn)\nFallen(elyn)\nUnsalaried(sharline)\nFallen(sharline)\nPeritoneal(sharline) -> Footless(sharline)\nforall x (Fallen(x) -> Peritoneal(x))\n\nnot Footless(sharline)\n\nFallen(sharline) and forall x (Fallen(x) -> Peritoneal(x)) -> therefore Peritoneal(sharline) Peritoneal(sharline) and Peritoneal(sharline) -> Footless(sharline) -> therefore Footless(sharline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Delcina is demonic. Delcina is chronic. Sheff is numerical. Sheff is demonic. Sheff is unbigoted. Sheff is chronic. Sheff is sniffly. Sheff is pancreatic. Monty is unbigoted. Monty is pancreatic. If Monty is demonic then Monty is chronic. If something is pancreatic then it is demonic. Monty is not furry.", "logic": "\nDemonic(delcina)\nChronic(delcina)\nNumerical(sheff)\nDemonic(sheff)\nUnbigoted(sheff)\nChronic(sheff)\nSniffly(sheff)\nPancreatic(sheff)\nUnbigoted(monty)\nPancreatic(monty)\nDemonic(monty) -> Chronic(monty)\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Demonic(x))\n\nnot Furry(monty)\n\nnot Furry(monty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Miran is mongolian. Miran is uppermost. Isadora is prideful. Isadora is mongolian. Isadora is uncousinly. Isadora is uppermost. Isadora is hangdog. Isadora is dignifying. Adel is uncousinly. Adel is dignifying. If Adel is mongolian then Adel is uppermost. If something is dignifying then it is mongolian. Miran is dignifying.", "logic": "\nMongolian(miran)\nUppermost(miran)\nPrideful(isadora)\nMongolian(isadora)\nUncousinly(isadora)\nUppermost(isadora)\nHangdog(isadora)\nDignifying(isadora)\nUncousinly(adel)\nDignifying(adel)\nMongolian(adel) -> Uppermost(adel)\nforall x (Dignifying(x) -> Mongolian(x))\n\nDignifying(miran)\n\nDignifying(miran) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Nonah is witching. Nonah is squandered. Faunie is unhindered. Faunie is witching. Faunie is sustained. Faunie is squandered. Faunie is segmental. Faunie is elated. Celeste is sustained. Celeste is elated. If Celeste is witching then Celeste is squandered. If something is elated then it is witching. Faunie is not furry.", "logic": "\nWitching(nonah)\nSquandered(nonah)\nUnhindered(faunie)\nWitching(faunie)\nSustained(faunie)\nSquandered(faunie)\nSegmental(faunie)\nElated(faunie)\nSustained(celeste)\nElated(celeste)\nWitching(celeste) -> Squandered(celeste)\nforall x (Elated(x) -> Witching(x))\n\nnot Furry(faunie)\n\nnot Furry(faunie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Lucretia is panicled. Lucretia is coiling. Madelle is precedent. Madelle is panicled. Madelle is odorous. Madelle is coiling. Madelle is marbled. Madelle is haitian. Phylys is odorous. Phylys is haitian. If Phylys is panicled then Phylys is coiling. If something is haitian then it is panicled. Lucretia is odorous.", "logic": "\nPanicled(lucretia)\nCoiling(lucretia)\nPrecedent(madelle)\nPanicled(madelle)\nOdorous(madelle)\nCoiling(madelle)\nMarbled(madelle)\nHaitian(madelle)\nOdorous(phylys)\nHaitian(phylys)\nPanicled(phylys) -> Coiling(phylys)\nforall x (Haitian(x) -> Panicled(x))\n\nOdorous(lucretia)\n\nOdorous(lucretia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Warren is utilizable. Warren is diachronic. Rania is extra. Rania is utilizable. Rania is sisterlike. Rania is diachronic. Rania is stocked. Rania is remaining. Anthony is sisterlike. Anthony is remaining. If Anthony is utilizable then Anthony is diachronic. If something is remaining then it is utilizable. Anthony is not extra.", "logic": "\nUtilizable(warren)\nDiachronic(warren)\nExtra(rania)\nUtilizable(rania)\nSisterlike(rania)\nDiachronic(rania)\nStocked(rania)\nRemaining(rania)\nSisterlike(anthony)\nRemaining(anthony)\nUtilizable(anthony) -> Diachronic(anthony)\nforall x (Remaining(x) -> Utilizable(x))\n\nnot Extra(anthony)\n\nnot Extra(anthony) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Claudie is skittish. Claudie is pushful. Dania is silvery. Dania is skittish. Dania is comforted. Dania is pushful. Dania is unsalted. Dania is fledged. Rawley is comforted. Rawley is fledged. If Rawley is skittish then Rawley is pushful. If something is fledged then it is skittish. Claudie is furry.", "logic": "\nSkittish(claudie)\nPushful(claudie)\nSilvery(dania)\nSkittish(dania)\nComforted(dania)\nPushful(dania)\nUnsalted(dania)\nFledged(dania)\nComforted(rawley)\nFledged(rawley)\nSkittish(rawley) -> Pushful(rawley)\nforall x (Fledged(x) -> Skittish(x))\n\nFurry(claudie)\n\nFurry(claudie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-675"} {"premises": "Maryjane is unbeaten. Maryjane is unreserved. Maryjane is outgoing. Maryjane is ungrateful. Dehlia is unbeaten. Dehlia is ungrateful. Nessa is labeled. Charles is heralded. Charles is unbeaten. Charles is outgoing. Charles is shattered. Charles is labeled. Young things are ungrateful. If something is ungrateful and labeled then it is unreserved. Charles is labeled.", "logic": "\nUnbeaten(maryjane)\nUnreserved(maryjane)\nOutgoing(maryjane)\nUngrateful(maryjane)\nUnbeaten(dehlia)\nUngrateful(dehlia)\nLabeled(nessa)\nHeralded(charles)\nUnbeaten(charles)\nOutgoing(charles)\nShattered(charles)\nLabeled(charles)\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) and Labeled(x) -> Unreserved(x))\n\nLabeled(charles)\n\ntherefore Labeled(charles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Stoddard is sleepless. Stoddard is dreamed. Stoddard is parvenu. Stoddard is undersize. Fredia is sleepless. Fredia is undersize. Reuben is garish. Honey is diestrous. Honey is sleepless. Honey is parvenu. Honey is vicarial. Honey is garish. Young things are undersize. If something is undersize and garish then it is dreamed. Honey is not diestrous.", "logic": "\nSleepless(stoddard)\nDreamed(stoddard)\nParvenu(stoddard)\nUndersize(stoddard)\nSleepless(fredia)\nUndersize(fredia)\nGarish(reuben)\nDiestrous(honey)\nSleepless(honey)\nParvenu(honey)\nVicarial(honey)\nGarish(honey)\nforall x (Garish(x) -> Undersize(x))\nforall x (Undersize(x) and Garish(x) -> Dreamed(x))\n\nnot Diestrous(honey)\n\ntherefore Diestrous(honey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Melosa is dilute. Melosa is agamic. Melosa is amnestic. Melosa is many. Bree is dilute. Bree is many. Lorene is ratified. Ozzy is summary. Ozzy is dilute. Ozzy is amnestic. Ozzy is lashing. Ozzy is ratified. Young things are many. If something is many and ratified then it is agamic. Lorene is many.", "logic": "\nDilute(melosa)\nAgamic(melosa)\nAmnestic(melosa)\nMany(melosa)\nDilute(bree)\nMany(bree)\nRatified(lorene)\nSummary(ozzy)\nDilute(ozzy)\nAmnestic(ozzy)\nLashing(ozzy)\nRatified(ozzy)\nforall x (Ratified(x) -> Many(x))\nforall x (Many(x) and Ratified(x) -> Agamic(x))\n\nMany(lorene)\n\nRatified(lorene) and forall x (Ratified(x) -> Many(x)) -> therefore Many(lorene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Dolora is simplified. Dolora is mechanised. Dolora is nourishing. Dolora is greyed. Jerrylee is simplified. Jerrylee is greyed. Lottie is puzzling. Ciel is chlamydial. Ciel is simplified. Ciel is nourishing. Ciel is undynamic. Ciel is puzzling. Young things are greyed. If something is greyed and puzzling then it is mechanised. Lottie is not greyed.", "logic": "\nSimplified(dolora)\nMechanised(dolora)\nNourishing(dolora)\nGreyed(dolora)\nSimplified(jerrylee)\nGreyed(jerrylee)\nPuzzling(lottie)\nChlamydial(ciel)\nSimplified(ciel)\nNourishing(ciel)\nUndynamic(ciel)\nPuzzling(ciel)\nforall x (Puzzling(x) -> Greyed(x))\nforall x (Greyed(x) and Puzzling(x) -> Mechanised(x))\n\nnot Greyed(lottie)\n\nPuzzling(lottie) and forall x (Puzzling(x) -> Greyed(x)) -> therefore Greyed(lottie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Lynette is admired. Lynette is tricolor. Lynette is distracted. Lynette is lviii. Donia is admired. Donia is lviii. Cammi is bored. Johannah is rotational. Johannah is admired. Johannah is distracted. Johannah is looted. Johannah is bored. Young things are lviii. If something is lviii and bored then it is tricolor. Cammi is tricolor.", "logic": "\nAdmired(lynette)\nTricolor(lynette)\nDistracted(lynette)\nLviii(lynette)\nAdmired(donia)\nLviii(donia)\nBored(cammi)\nRotational(johannah)\nAdmired(johannah)\nDistracted(johannah)\nLooted(johannah)\nBored(johannah)\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Lviii(x))\nforall x (Lviii(x) and Bored(x) -> Tricolor(x))\n\nTricolor(cammi)\n\nBored(cammi) and forall x (Bored(x) -> Lviii(x)) -> therefore Lviii(cammi) Lviii(cammi) and Bored(cammi) and forall x (Lviii(x) and Bored(x) -> Tricolor(x)) -> therefore Tricolor(cammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Forrest is undirected. Forrest is burbling. Forrest is dissilient. Forrest is stooping. Eda is undirected. Eda is stooping. Yoshiko is afflicted. Gracia is tricolor. Gracia is undirected. Gracia is dissilient. Gracia is parisian. Gracia is afflicted. Young things are stooping. If something is stooping and afflicted then it is burbling. Yoshiko is not burbling.", "logic": "\nUndirected(forrest)\nBurbling(forrest)\nDissilient(forrest)\nStooping(forrest)\nUndirected(eda)\nStooping(eda)\nAfflicted(yoshiko)\nTricolor(gracia)\nUndirected(gracia)\nDissilient(gracia)\nParisian(gracia)\nAfflicted(gracia)\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Stooping(x) and Afflicted(x) -> Burbling(x))\n\nnot Burbling(yoshiko)\n\nAfflicted(yoshiko) and forall x (Afflicted(x) -> Stooping(x)) -> therefore Stooping(yoshiko) Stooping(yoshiko) and Afflicted(yoshiko) and forall x (Stooping(x) and Afflicted(x) -> Burbling(x)) -> therefore Burbling(yoshiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Winton is algonkian. Winton is dour. Winton is arboriform. Winton is barefoot. Leanne is algonkian. Leanne is barefoot. Johann is fabian. Elisa is stomatous. Elisa is algonkian. Elisa is arboriform. Elisa is utterable. Elisa is fabian. Young things are barefoot. If something is barefoot and fabian then it is dour. Leanne is not dour.", "logic": "\nAlgonkian(winton)\nDour(winton)\nArboriform(winton)\nBarefoot(winton)\nAlgonkian(leanne)\nBarefoot(leanne)\nFabian(johann)\nStomatous(elisa)\nAlgonkian(elisa)\nArboriform(elisa)\nUtterable(elisa)\nFabian(elisa)\nforall x (Fabian(x) -> Barefoot(x))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Fabian(x) -> Dour(x))\n\nnot Dour(leanne)\n\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Fabian(x) -> Dour(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Luther is additive. Luther is humorless. Luther is achenial. Luther is secluded. Kalindi is additive. Kalindi is secluded. Maxy is organismal. Charil is unfretted. Charil is additive. Charil is achenial. Charil is overmodest. Charil is organismal. Young things are secluded. If something is secluded and organismal then it is humorless. Maxy is additive.", "logic": "\nAdditive(luther)\nHumorless(luther)\nAchenial(luther)\nSecluded(luther)\nAdditive(kalindi)\nSecluded(kalindi)\nOrganismal(maxy)\nUnfretted(charil)\nAdditive(charil)\nAchenial(charil)\nOvermodest(charil)\nOrganismal(charil)\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> Secluded(x))\nforall x (Secluded(x) and Organismal(x) -> Humorless(x))\n\nAdditive(maxy)\n\nAdditive(maxy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Bethany is gracile. Bethany is shoed. Bethany is zymolytic. Bethany is studied. Skippie is gracile. Skippie is studied. Zola is potbellied. Berthe is tearful. Berthe is gracile. Berthe is zymolytic. Berthe is interfaith. Berthe is potbellied. Young things are studied. If something is studied and potbellied then it is shoed. Skippie is not tearful.", "logic": "\nGracile(bethany)\nShoed(bethany)\nZymolytic(bethany)\nStudied(bethany)\nGracile(skippie)\nStudied(skippie)\nPotbellied(zola)\nTearful(berthe)\nGracile(berthe)\nZymolytic(berthe)\nInterfaith(berthe)\nPotbellied(berthe)\nforall x (Potbellied(x) -> Studied(x))\nforall x (Studied(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Shoed(x))\n\nnot Tearful(skippie)\n\nnot Tearful(skippie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Libbey is seedy. Libbey is primary. Libbey is burned. Libbey is razorback. Arlena is seedy. Arlena is razorback. Cyrillus is burbling. Vibhu is statant. Vibhu is seedy. Vibhu is burned. Vibhu is maidenlike. Vibhu is burbling. Young things are razorback. If something is razorback and burbling then it is primary. Cyrillus is statant.", "logic": "\nSeedy(libbey)\nPrimary(libbey)\nBurned(libbey)\nRazorback(libbey)\nSeedy(arlena)\nRazorback(arlena)\nBurbling(cyrillus)\nStatant(vibhu)\nSeedy(vibhu)\nBurned(vibhu)\nMaidenlike(vibhu)\nBurbling(vibhu)\nforall x (Burbling(x) -> Razorback(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) and Burbling(x) -> Primary(x))\n\nStatant(cyrillus)\n\nStatant(cyrillus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Gwyn is seamy. Gwyn is lukewarm. Gwyn is visible. Gwyn is unstudious. Morganica is seamy. Morganica is unstudious. Archy is reluctant. Kathrine is austere. Kathrine is seamy. Kathrine is visible. Kathrine is downtown. Kathrine is reluctant. Young things are unstudious. If something is unstudious and reluctant then it is lukewarm. Morganica is not visible.", "logic": "\nSeamy(gwyn)\nLukewarm(gwyn)\nVisible(gwyn)\nUnstudious(gwyn)\nSeamy(morganica)\nUnstudious(morganica)\nReluctant(archy)\nAustere(kathrine)\nSeamy(kathrine)\nVisible(kathrine)\nDowntown(kathrine)\nReluctant(kathrine)\nforall x (Reluctant(x) -> Unstudious(x))\nforall x (Unstudious(x) and Reluctant(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\n\nnot Visible(morganica)\n\nnot Visible(morganica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Wain is exquisite. Wain is occult. Wain is boskopoid. Wain is grayish. Lynna is exquisite. Lynna is grayish. Mirilla is duodecimal. Darline is sufferable. Darline is exquisite. Darline is boskopoid. Darline is suffusive. Darline is duodecimal. Young things are grayish. If something is grayish and duodecimal then it is occult. Lynna is suffusive.", "logic": "\nExquisite(wain)\nOccult(wain)\nBoskopoid(wain)\nGrayish(wain)\nExquisite(lynna)\nGrayish(lynna)\nDuodecimal(mirilla)\nSufferable(darline)\nExquisite(darline)\nBoskopoid(darline)\nSuffusive(darline)\nDuodecimal(darline)\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> Grayish(x))\nforall x (Grayish(x) and Duodecimal(x) -> Occult(x))\n\nSuffusive(lynna)\n\nSuffusive(lynna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-162"} {"premises": "Lynette is mauve. Lynette is unshared. Lynette is xcviii. Lynette is monarchic. Lynette is invisible. Lynette is designing. Lynette is unmelted. Jolene is mauve. Jolene is xcviii. Jolene is monarchic. Jolene is designing. Jolene is unmelted. Quiet, unshared people are invisible. All designing, mauve people are unshared. Jolene is monarchic.", "logic": "\nMauve(lynette)\nUnshared(lynette)\nXcviii(lynette)\nMonarchic(lynette)\nInvisible(lynette)\nDesigning(lynette)\nUnmelted(lynette)\nMauve(jolene)\nXcviii(jolene)\nMonarchic(jolene)\nDesigning(jolene)\nUnmelted(jolene)\nforall x (Xcviii(x) and Unshared(x) -> Invisible(x))\nforall x (Designing(x) and Mauve(x) -> Unshared(x))\n\nMonarchic(jolene)\n\ntherefore Monarchic(jolene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Bengt is aggravated. Bengt is bismuthic. Bengt is slavelike. Bengt is seasoned. Bengt is ghanaian. Bengt is projecting. Bengt is stereo. Tallie is aggravated. Tallie is slavelike. Tallie is seasoned. Tallie is projecting. Tallie is stereo. Quiet, bismuthic people are ghanaian. All projecting, aggravated people are bismuthic. Bengt is not slavelike.", "logic": "\nAggravated(bengt)\nBismuthic(bengt)\nSlavelike(bengt)\nSeasoned(bengt)\nGhanaian(bengt)\nProjecting(bengt)\nStereo(bengt)\nAggravated(tallie)\nSlavelike(tallie)\nSeasoned(tallie)\nProjecting(tallie)\nStereo(tallie)\nforall x (Slavelike(x) and Bismuthic(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Projecting(x) and Aggravated(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\n\nnot Slavelike(bengt)\n\ntherefore Slavelike(bengt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Osborne is dextrorsal. Osborne is geothermal. Osborne is lesser. Osborne is rackety. Osborne is scorched. Osborne is operculate. Osborne is excellent. Waine is dextrorsal. Waine is lesser. Waine is rackety. Waine is operculate. Waine is excellent. Quiet, geothermal people are scorched. All operculate, dextrorsal people are geothermal. Waine is geothermal.", "logic": "\nDextrorsal(osborne)\nGeothermal(osborne)\nLesser(osborne)\nRackety(osborne)\nScorched(osborne)\nOperculate(osborne)\nExcellent(osborne)\nDextrorsal(waine)\nLesser(waine)\nRackety(waine)\nOperculate(waine)\nExcellent(waine)\nforall x (Lesser(x) and Geothermal(x) -> Scorched(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) and Dextrorsal(x) -> Geothermal(x))\n\nGeothermal(waine)\n\nOperculate(waine) and Dextrorsal(waine) and forall x (Operculate(x) and Dextrorsal(x) -> Geothermal(x)) -> therefore Geothermal(waine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Genevra is refreshful. Genevra is svelte. Genevra is pareve. Genevra is sunk. Genevra is sylvan. Genevra is bonkers. Genevra is nonechoic. Georgette is refreshful. Georgette is pareve. Georgette is sunk. Georgette is bonkers. Georgette is nonechoic. Quiet, svelte people are sylvan. All bonkers, refreshful people are svelte. Georgette is not svelte.", "logic": "\nRefreshful(genevra)\nSvelte(genevra)\nPareve(genevra)\nSunk(genevra)\nSylvan(genevra)\nBonkers(genevra)\nNonechoic(genevra)\nRefreshful(georgette)\nPareve(georgette)\nSunk(georgette)\nBonkers(georgette)\nNonechoic(georgette)\nforall x (Pareve(x) and Svelte(x) -> Sylvan(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) and Refreshful(x) -> Svelte(x))\n\nnot Svelte(georgette)\n\nBonkers(georgette) and Refreshful(georgette) and forall x (Bonkers(x) and Refreshful(x) -> Svelte(x)) -> therefore Svelte(georgette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Yance is briary. Yance is moralistic. Yance is locomotive. Yance is colloidal. Yance is enwrapped. Yance is stolid. Yance is corrugated. Sileas is briary. Sileas is locomotive. Sileas is colloidal. Sileas is stolid. Sileas is corrugated. Quiet, moralistic people are enwrapped. All stolid, briary people are moralistic. Sileas is enwrapped.", "logic": "\nBriary(yance)\nMoralistic(yance)\nLocomotive(yance)\nColloidal(yance)\nEnwrapped(yance)\nStolid(yance)\nCorrugated(yance)\nBriary(sileas)\nLocomotive(sileas)\nColloidal(sileas)\nStolid(sileas)\nCorrugated(sileas)\nforall x (Locomotive(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Enwrapped(x))\nforall x (Stolid(x) and Briary(x) -> Moralistic(x))\n\nEnwrapped(sileas)\n\nStolid(sileas) and Briary(sileas) and forall x (Stolid(x) and Briary(x) -> Moralistic(x)) -> therefore Moralistic(sileas) Locomotive(sileas) and Moralistic(sileas) and forall x (Locomotive(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Enwrapped(x)) -> therefore Enwrapped(sileas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Appolonia is testate. Appolonia is acronymous. Appolonia is annulated. Appolonia is dubitable. Appolonia is canonist. Appolonia is convex. Appolonia is unavowed. Raymund is testate. Raymund is annulated. Raymund is dubitable. Raymund is convex. Raymund is unavowed. Quiet, acronymous people are canonist. All convex, testate people are acronymous. Raymund is not canonist.", "logic": "\nTestate(appolonia)\nAcronymous(appolonia)\nAnnulated(appolonia)\nDubitable(appolonia)\nCanonist(appolonia)\nConvex(appolonia)\nUnavowed(appolonia)\nTestate(raymund)\nAnnulated(raymund)\nDubitable(raymund)\nConvex(raymund)\nUnavowed(raymund)\nforall x (Annulated(x) and Acronymous(x) -> Canonist(x))\nforall x (Convex(x) and Testate(x) -> Acronymous(x))\n\nnot Canonist(raymund)\n\nConvex(raymund) and Testate(raymund) and forall x (Convex(x) and Testate(x) -> Acronymous(x)) -> therefore Acronymous(raymund) Annulated(raymund) and Acronymous(raymund) and forall x (Annulated(x) and Acronymous(x) -> Canonist(x)) -> therefore Canonist(raymund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Osborn is xxxi. All fine people are chanted. If Osborn is xxxi then Osborn is fine. Osborn is xxxi.", "logic": "\nXxxi(osborn)\nforall x (Fine(x) -> Chanted(x))\nXxxi(osborn) -> Fine(osborn)\n\nXxxi(osborn)\n\ntherefore Xxxi(osborn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Shanda is teutonic. All potted people are pyrrhic. If Shanda is teutonic then Shanda is potted. Shanda is not teutonic.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(shanda)\nforall x (Potted(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nTeutonic(shanda) -> Potted(shanda)\n\nnot Teutonic(shanda)\n\ntherefore Teutonic(shanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Merissa is resinated. All outer people are hesitating. If Merissa is resinated then Merissa is outer. Merissa is outer.", "logic": "\nResinated(merissa)\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Hesitating(x))\nResinated(merissa) -> Outer(merissa)\n\nOuter(merissa)\n\nResinated(merissa) and Resinated(merissa) -> Outer(merissa) -> therefore Outer(merissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Annabela is terrific. All iridescent people are federate. If Annabela is terrific then Annabela is iridescent. Annabela is not iridescent.", "logic": "\nTerrific(annabela)\nforall x (Iridescent(x) -> Federate(x))\nTerrific(annabela) -> Iridescent(annabela)\n\nnot Iridescent(annabela)\n\nTerrific(annabela) and Terrific(annabela) -> Iridescent(annabela) -> therefore Iridescent(annabela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Mirabella is drafty. All fired people are afferent. If Mirabella is drafty then Mirabella is fired. Mirabella is afferent.", "logic": "\nDrafty(mirabella)\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Afferent(x))\nDrafty(mirabella) -> Fired(mirabella)\n\nAfferent(mirabella)\n\nDrafty(mirabella) and Drafty(mirabella) -> Fired(mirabella) -> therefore Fired(mirabella) Fired(mirabella) and forall x (Fired(x) -> Afferent(x)) -> therefore Afferent(mirabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Gwenette is hopeful. All lubberly people are heinous. If Gwenette is hopeful then Gwenette is lubberly. Gwenette is not heinous.", "logic": "\nHopeful(gwenette)\nforall x (Lubberly(x) -> Heinous(x))\nHopeful(gwenette) -> Lubberly(gwenette)\n\nnot Heinous(gwenette)\n\nHopeful(gwenette) and Hopeful(gwenette) -> Lubberly(gwenette) -> therefore Lubberly(gwenette) Lubberly(gwenette) and forall x (Lubberly(x) -> Heinous(x)) -> therefore Heinous(gwenette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Herta is fishy. All latent people are stylized. If Herta is fishy then Herta is latent. Herta is not rough.", "logic": "\nFishy(herta)\nforall x (Latent(x) -> Stylized(x))\nFishy(herta) -> Latent(herta)\n\nnot Rough(herta)\n\nnot Rough(herta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Deeann is soled. All delphian people are such. If Deeann is soled then Deeann is delphian. Deeann is kind.", "logic": "\nSoled(deeann)\nforall x (Delphian(x) -> Such(x))\nSoled(deeann) -> Delphian(deeann)\n\nKind(deeann)\n\nKind(deeann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Isabel is shameless. All celebrated people are comestible. If Isabel is shameless then Isabel is celebrated. Isabel is not blue.", "logic": "\nShameless(isabel)\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Comestible(x))\nShameless(isabel) -> Celebrated(isabel)\n\nnot Blue(isabel)\n\nnot Blue(isabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "Nariko is racking. All incendiary people are aramaic. If Nariko is racking then Nariko is incendiary. Nariko is cold.", "logic": "\nRacking(nariko)\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nRacking(nariko) -> Incendiary(nariko)\n\nCold(nariko)\n\nCold(nariko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-682"} {"premises": "The geoff is alike. The geoff swat the beck. The dion victimize the beck. The dion is alike. The dion is unequaled. The dion swat the geoff. The dion swat the beck. The dion hurt the geoff. The beck is masculine. The beck swat the geoff. The beck swat the dion. The beck hurt the geoff. All masculine things are unequaled. If something is masculine and it hurt the geoff then the geoff is masculine. The dion is alike.", "logic": "\nAlike(geoff)\nSwat(geoff, beck)\nVictimize(dion, beck)\nAlike(dion)\nUnequaled(dion)\nSwat(dion, geoff)\nSwat(dion, beck)\nHurt(dion, geoff)\nMasculine(beck)\nSwat(beck, geoff)\nSwat(beck, dion)\nHurt(beck, geoff)\nforall x (Masculine(x) -> Unequaled(x))\nforall x (Masculine(x) and Hurt(x, geoff) -> Masculine(geoff))\n\nAlike(dion)\n\ntherefore Alike(dion)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The rubetta is indiscreet. The rubetta flagellate the juliana. The roseline smear the juliana. The roseline is indiscreet. The roseline is counter. The roseline flagellate the rubetta. The roseline flagellate the juliana. The roseline subtitle the rubetta. The juliana is dyslectic. The juliana flagellate the rubetta. The juliana flagellate the roseline. The juliana subtitle the rubetta. All dyslectic things are counter. If something is dyslectic and it subtitle the rubetta then the rubetta is dyslectic. The juliana does not see the rubetta.", "logic": "\nIndiscreet(rubetta)\nFlagellate(rubetta, juliana)\nSmear(roseline, juliana)\nIndiscreet(roseline)\nCounter(roseline)\nFlagellate(roseline, rubetta)\nFlagellate(roseline, juliana)\nSubtitle(roseline, rubetta)\nDyslectic(juliana)\nFlagellate(juliana, rubetta)\nFlagellate(juliana, roseline)\nSubtitle(juliana, rubetta)\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) -> Counter(x))\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) and Subtitle(x, rubetta) -> Dyslectic(rubetta))\n\nnot Flagellate(juliana, rubetta)\n\ntherefore Flagellate(juliana, rubetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The lysandra is aerophilic. The lysandra horseshoe the shelbi. The penny demean the shelbi. The penny is aerophilic. The penny is nonmoving. The penny horseshoe the lysandra. The penny horseshoe the shelbi. The penny tarry the lysandra. The shelbi is inborn. The shelbi horseshoe the lysandra. The shelbi horseshoe the penny. The shelbi tarry the lysandra. All inborn things are nonmoving. If something is inborn and it tarry the lysandra then the lysandra is inborn. The shelbi is nonmoving.", "logic": "\nAerophilic(lysandra)\nHorseshoe(lysandra, shelbi)\nDemean(penny, shelbi)\nAerophilic(penny)\nNonmoving(penny)\nHorseshoe(penny, lysandra)\nHorseshoe(penny, shelbi)\nTarry(penny, lysandra)\nInborn(shelbi)\nHorseshoe(shelbi, lysandra)\nHorseshoe(shelbi, penny)\nTarry(shelbi, lysandra)\nforall x (Inborn(x) -> Nonmoving(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) and Tarry(x, lysandra) -> Inborn(lysandra))\n\nNonmoving(shelbi)\n\nInborn(shelbi) and forall x (Inborn(x) -> Nonmoving(x)) -> therefore Nonmoving(shelbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The russel is furrowed. The russel anticipate the arabel. The mathilde equalise the arabel. The mathilde is furrowed. The mathilde is frozen. The mathilde anticipate the russel. The mathilde anticipate the arabel. The mathilde interrupt the russel. The arabel is prostate. The arabel anticipate the russel. The arabel anticipate the mathilde. The arabel interrupt the russel. All prostate things are frozen. If something is prostate and it interrupt the russel then the russel is prostate. The arabel is not frozen.", "logic": "\nFurrowed(russel)\nAnticipate(russel, arabel)\nEqualise(mathilde, arabel)\nFurrowed(mathilde)\nFrozen(mathilde)\nAnticipate(mathilde, russel)\nAnticipate(mathilde, arabel)\nInterrupt(mathilde, russel)\nProstate(arabel)\nAnticipate(arabel, russel)\nAnticipate(arabel, mathilde)\nInterrupt(arabel, russel)\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> Frozen(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) and Interrupt(x, russel) -> Prostate(russel))\n\nnot Frozen(arabel)\n\nProstate(arabel) and forall x (Prostate(x) -> Frozen(x)) -> therefore Frozen(arabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The bay is fledged. The bay pommel the lois. The corrinne pollute the lois. The corrinne is fledged. The corrinne is grumose. The corrinne pommel the bay. The corrinne pommel the lois. The corrinne gall the bay. The lois is verboten. The lois pommel the bay. The lois pommel the corrinne. The lois gall the bay. All verboten things are grumose. If something is verboten and it gall the bay then the bay is verboten. The bay is grumose.", "logic": "\nFledged(bay)\nPommel(bay, lois)\nPollute(corrinne, lois)\nFledged(corrinne)\nGrumose(corrinne)\nPommel(corrinne, bay)\nPommel(corrinne, lois)\nGall(corrinne, bay)\nVerboten(lois)\nPommel(lois, bay)\nPommel(lois, corrinne)\nGall(lois, bay)\nforall x (Verboten(x) -> Grumose(x))\nforall x (Verboten(x) and Gall(x, bay) -> Verboten(bay))\n\nGrumose(bay)\n\nVerboten(lois) and Gall(lois, bay) and forall x (Verboten(x) and Gall(x, bay) -> Verboten(bay)) -> therefore Verboten(bay) Verboten(bay) and forall x (Verboten(x) -> Grumose(x)) -> therefore Grumose(bay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The kizzie is luculent. The kizzie triumph the josselyn. The ashli cushion the josselyn. The ashli is luculent. The ashli is vexatious. The ashli triumph the kizzie. The ashli triumph the josselyn. The ashli shellack the kizzie. The josselyn is baking. The josselyn triumph the kizzie. The josselyn triumph the ashli. The josselyn shellack the kizzie. All baking things are vexatious. If something is baking and it shellack the kizzie then the kizzie is baking. The kizzie is not vexatious.", "logic": "\nLuculent(kizzie)\nTriumph(kizzie, josselyn)\nCushion(ashli, josselyn)\nLuculent(ashli)\nVexatious(ashli)\nTriumph(ashli, kizzie)\nTriumph(ashli, josselyn)\nShellack(ashli, kizzie)\nBaking(josselyn)\nTriumph(josselyn, kizzie)\nTriumph(josselyn, ashli)\nShellack(josselyn, kizzie)\nforall x (Baking(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Baking(x) and Shellack(x, kizzie) -> Baking(kizzie))\n\nnot Vexatious(kizzie)\n\nBaking(josselyn) and Shellack(josselyn, kizzie) and forall x (Baking(x) and Shellack(x, kizzie) -> Baking(kizzie)) -> therefore Baking(kizzie) Baking(kizzie) and forall x (Baking(x) -> Vexatious(x)) -> therefore Vexatious(kizzie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The wenona is axonal. The wenona awake the dustin. The eben maunder the dustin. The eben is axonal. The eben is unusable. The eben awake the wenona. The eben awake the dustin. The eben devour the wenona. The dustin is archaean. The dustin awake the wenona. The dustin awake the eben. The dustin devour the wenona. All archaean things are unusable. If something is archaean and it devour the wenona then the wenona is archaean. The wenona is not blue.", "logic": "\nAxonal(wenona)\nAwake(wenona, dustin)\nMaunder(eben, dustin)\nAxonal(eben)\nUnusable(eben)\nAwake(eben, wenona)\nAwake(eben, dustin)\nDevour(eben, wenona)\nArchaean(dustin)\nAwake(dustin, wenona)\nAwake(dustin, eben)\nDevour(dustin, wenona)\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Unusable(x))\nforall x (Archaean(x) and Devour(x, wenona) -> Archaean(wenona))\n\nnot Blue(wenona)\n\nnot Blue(wenona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The daniel is trivial. The daniel vitriol the ida. The harris sleep the ida. The harris is trivial. The harris is dainty. The harris vitriol the daniel. The harris vitriol the ida. The harris hulk the daniel. The ida is enkindled. The ida vitriol the daniel. The ida vitriol the harris. The ida hulk the daniel. All enkindled things are dainty. If something is enkindled and it hulk the daniel then the daniel is enkindled. The harris hulk the harris.", "logic": "\nTrivial(daniel)\nVitriol(daniel, ida)\nSleep(harris, ida)\nTrivial(harris)\nDainty(harris)\nVitriol(harris, daniel)\nVitriol(harris, ida)\nHulk(harris, daniel)\nEnkindled(ida)\nVitriol(ida, daniel)\nVitriol(ida, harris)\nHulk(ida, daniel)\nforall x (Enkindled(x) -> Dainty(x))\nforall x (Enkindled(x) and Hulk(x, daniel) -> Enkindled(daniel))\n\nHulk(harris, harris)\n\nHulk(harris, harris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The garrot is frisky. The garrot book the rodrick. The rolf smack the rodrick. The rolf is frisky. The rolf is symbolic. The rolf book the garrot. The rolf book the rodrick. The rolf canton the garrot. The rodrick is attentive. The rodrick book the garrot. The rodrick book the rolf. The rodrick canton the garrot. All attentive things are symbolic. If something is attentive and it canton the garrot then the garrot is attentive. The garrot does not see the rolf.", "logic": "\nFrisky(garrot)\nBook(garrot, rodrick)\nSmack(rolf, rodrick)\nFrisky(rolf)\nSymbolic(rolf)\nBook(rolf, garrot)\nBook(rolf, rodrick)\nCanton(rolf, garrot)\nAttentive(rodrick)\nBook(rodrick, garrot)\nBook(rodrick, rolf)\nCanton(rodrick, garrot)\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Symbolic(x))\nforall x (Attentive(x) and Canton(x, garrot) -> Attentive(garrot))\n\nnot Book(garrot, rolf)\n\nnot Book(garrot, rolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The onlea is refractory. The onlea gangrene the david. The brandi cosponsor the david. The brandi is refractory. The brandi is euphonical. The brandi gangrene the onlea. The brandi gangrene the david. The brandi approach the onlea. The david is vested. The david gangrene the onlea. The david gangrene the brandi. The david approach the onlea. All vested things are euphonical. If something is vested and it approach the onlea then the onlea is vested. The david is rough.", "logic": "\nRefractory(onlea)\nGangrene(onlea, david)\nCosponsor(brandi, david)\nRefractory(brandi)\nEuphonical(brandi)\nGangrene(brandi, onlea)\nGangrene(brandi, david)\nApproach(brandi, onlea)\nVested(david)\nGangrene(david, onlea)\nGangrene(david, brandi)\nApproach(david, onlea)\nforall x (Vested(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Vested(x) and Approach(x, onlea) -> Vested(onlea))\n\nRough(david)\n\nRough(david) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The liora is perceived. The liora thank the sybyl. The derrick thrombose the sybyl. The derrick is perceived. The derrick is dour. The derrick thank the liora. The derrick thank the sybyl. The derrick embrangle the liora. The sybyl is semiliquid. The sybyl thank the liora. The sybyl thank the derrick. The sybyl embrangle the liora. All semiliquid things are dour. If something is semiliquid and it embrangle the liora then the liora is semiliquid. The liora is not rough.", "logic": "\nPerceived(liora)\nThank(liora, sybyl)\nThrombose(derrick, sybyl)\nPerceived(derrick)\nDour(derrick)\nThank(derrick, liora)\nThank(derrick, sybyl)\nEmbrangle(derrick, liora)\nSemiliquid(sybyl)\nThank(sybyl, liora)\nThank(sybyl, derrick)\nEmbrangle(sybyl, liora)\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Dour(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Embrangle(x, liora) -> Semiliquid(liora))\n\nnot Rough(liora)\n\nnot Rough(liora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The gil is raiseable. The gil harbour the berrie. The ruthie rename the berrie. The ruthie is raiseable. The ruthie is benthonic. The ruthie harbour the gil. The ruthie harbour the berrie. The ruthie reply the gil. The berrie is underarm. The berrie harbour the gil. The berrie harbour the ruthie. The berrie reply the gil. All underarm things are benthonic. If something is underarm and it reply the gil then the gil is underarm. The berrie harbour the berrie.", "logic": "\nRaiseable(gil)\nHarbour(gil, berrie)\nRename(ruthie, berrie)\nRaiseable(ruthie)\nBenthonic(ruthie)\nHarbour(ruthie, gil)\nHarbour(ruthie, berrie)\nReply(ruthie, gil)\nUnderarm(berrie)\nHarbour(berrie, gil)\nHarbour(berrie, ruthie)\nReply(berrie, gil)\nforall x (Underarm(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nforall x (Underarm(x) and Reply(x, gil) -> Underarm(gil))\n\nHarbour(berrie, berrie)\n\nHarbour(berrie, berrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1492"} {"premises": "The zorine reconquer the andreana. The zorine is conductive. The zorine is embolic. The zorine is not hired. The zorine is aphasic. The zorine is kenyan. The zorine defuse the andreana. The zorine emboss the andreana. The andreana does not eat the zorine. The andreana is conductive. The andreana is embolic. The andreana is hired. The andreana is kenyan. The andreana does not need the zorine. The andreana emboss the zorine. If something emboss the zorine and the zorine reconquer the andreana then the zorine emboss the andreana. If something is embolic and it reconquer the zorine then it defuse the andreana. If something reconquer the zorine and the zorine defuse the andreana then the andreana is aphasic. If something reconquer the andreana then it defuse the zorine. If something emboss the andreana then it reconquer the zorine. If something reconquer the zorine and the zorine is kenyan then it is conductive. The andreana does not eat the zorine.", "logic": "\nReconquer(zorine, andreana)\nConductive(zorine)\nEmbolic(zorine)\nnot Hired(zorine)\nAphasic(zorine)\nKenyan(zorine)\nDefuse(zorine, andreana)\nEmboss(zorine, andreana)\nnot Reconquer(andreana, zorine)\nConductive(andreana)\nEmbolic(andreana)\nHired(andreana)\nKenyan(andreana)\nnot Defuse(andreana, zorine)\nEmboss(andreana, zorine)\nforall x (Emboss(x, zorine) and Reconquer(zorine, andreana) -> Emboss(zorine, andreana))\nforall x (Embolic(x) and Reconquer(x, zorine) -> Defuse(x, andreana))\nforall x (Reconquer(x, zorine) and Defuse(zorine, andreana) -> Aphasic(andreana))\nforall x (Reconquer(x, andreana) -> Defuse(x, zorine))\nforall x (Emboss(x, andreana) -> Reconquer(x, zorine))\nforall x (Reconquer(x, zorine) and Kenyan(zorine) -> Conductive(x))\n\nnot Reconquer(andreana, zorine)\n\ntherefore not Reconquer(andreana, zorine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The friedric bacterize the corene. The friedric is peeled. The friedric is uvular. The friedric is not sensitised. The friedric is fulminant. The friedric is numinous. The friedric parachute the corene. The friedric caracole the corene. The corene does not eat the friedric. The corene is peeled. The corene is uvular. The corene is sensitised. The corene is numinous. The corene does not need the friedric. The corene caracole the friedric. If something caracole the friedric and the friedric bacterize the corene then the friedric caracole the corene. If something is uvular and it bacterize the friedric then it parachute the corene. If something bacterize the friedric and the friedric parachute the corene then the corene is fulminant. If something bacterize the corene then it parachute the friedric. If something caracole the corene then it bacterize the friedric. If something bacterize the friedric and the friedric is numinous then it is peeled. The corene does not visit the friedric.", "logic": "\nBacterize(friedric, corene)\nPeeled(friedric)\nUvular(friedric)\nnot Sensitised(friedric)\nFulminant(friedric)\nNuminous(friedric)\nParachute(friedric, corene)\nCaracole(friedric, corene)\nnot Bacterize(corene, friedric)\nPeeled(corene)\nUvular(corene)\nSensitised(corene)\nNuminous(corene)\nnot Parachute(corene, friedric)\nCaracole(corene, friedric)\nforall x (Caracole(x, friedric) and Bacterize(friedric, corene) -> Caracole(friedric, corene))\nforall x (Uvular(x) and Bacterize(x, friedric) -> Parachute(x, corene))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, friedric) and Parachute(friedric, corene) -> Fulminant(corene))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, corene) -> Parachute(x, friedric))\nforall x (Caracole(x, corene) -> Bacterize(x, friedric))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, friedric) and Numinous(friedric) -> Peeled(x))\n\nnot Caracole(corene, friedric)\n\ntherefore Caracole(corene, friedric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The gerty plant the lacee. The gerty is plenary. The gerty is least. The gerty is not unhopeful. The gerty is vaporized. The gerty is lusty. The gerty sheathe the lacee. The gerty chuckle the lacee. The lacee does not eat the gerty. The lacee is plenary. The lacee is least. The lacee is unhopeful. The lacee is lusty. The lacee does not need the gerty. The lacee chuckle the gerty. If something chuckle the gerty and the gerty plant the lacee then the gerty chuckle the lacee. If something is least and it plant the gerty then it sheathe the lacee. If something plant the gerty and the gerty sheathe the lacee then the lacee is vaporized. If something plant the lacee then it sheathe the gerty. If something chuckle the lacee then it plant the gerty. If something plant the gerty and the gerty is lusty then it is plenary. The gerty plant the gerty.", "logic": "\nPlant(gerty, lacee)\nPlenary(gerty)\nLeast(gerty)\nnot Unhopeful(gerty)\nVaporized(gerty)\nLusty(gerty)\nSheathe(gerty, lacee)\nChuckle(gerty, lacee)\nnot Plant(lacee, gerty)\nPlenary(lacee)\nLeast(lacee)\nUnhopeful(lacee)\nLusty(lacee)\nnot Sheathe(lacee, gerty)\nChuckle(lacee, gerty)\nforall x (Chuckle(x, gerty) and Plant(gerty, lacee) -> Chuckle(gerty, lacee))\nforall x (Least(x) and Plant(x, gerty) -> Sheathe(x, lacee))\nforall x (Plant(x, gerty) and Sheathe(gerty, lacee) -> Vaporized(lacee))\nforall x (Plant(x, lacee) -> Sheathe(x, gerty))\nforall x (Chuckle(x, lacee) -> Plant(x, gerty))\nforall x (Plant(x, gerty) and Lusty(gerty) -> Plenary(x))\n\nPlant(gerty, gerty)\n\nChuckle(gerty, lacee) and forall x (Chuckle(x, lacee) -> Plant(x, gerty)) -> therefore Plant(gerty, gerty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The alleen intermarry the ursulina. The alleen is stocky. The alleen is callable. The alleen is not bonnie. The alleen is prostyle. The alleen is preset. The alleen approach the ursulina. The alleen sleep the ursulina. The ursulina does not eat the alleen. The ursulina is stocky. The ursulina is callable. The ursulina is bonnie. The ursulina is preset. The ursulina does not need the alleen. The ursulina sleep the alleen. If something sleep the alleen and the alleen intermarry the ursulina then the alleen sleep the ursulina. If something is callable and it intermarry the alleen then it approach the ursulina. If something intermarry the alleen and the alleen approach the ursulina then the ursulina is prostyle. If something intermarry the ursulina then it approach the alleen. If something sleep the ursulina then it intermarry the alleen. If something intermarry the alleen and the alleen is preset then it is stocky. The alleen does not need the alleen.", "logic": "\nIntermarry(alleen, ursulina)\nStocky(alleen)\nCallable(alleen)\nnot Bonnie(alleen)\nProstyle(alleen)\nPreset(alleen)\nApproach(alleen, ursulina)\nSleep(alleen, ursulina)\nnot Intermarry(ursulina, alleen)\nStocky(ursulina)\nCallable(ursulina)\nBonnie(ursulina)\nPreset(ursulina)\nnot Approach(ursulina, alleen)\nSleep(ursulina, alleen)\nforall x (Sleep(x, alleen) and Intermarry(alleen, ursulina) -> Sleep(alleen, ursulina))\nforall x (Callable(x) and Intermarry(x, alleen) -> Approach(x, ursulina))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, alleen) and Approach(alleen, ursulina) -> Prostyle(ursulina))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, ursulina) -> Approach(x, alleen))\nforall x (Sleep(x, ursulina) -> Intermarry(x, alleen))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, alleen) and Preset(alleen) -> Stocky(x))\n\nnot Approach(alleen, alleen)\n\nIntermarry(alleen, ursulina) and forall x (Intermarry(x, ursulina) -> Approach(x, alleen)) -> therefore Approach(alleen, alleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The angeline lyophilise the kimberley. The angeline is graven. The angeline is uncombed. The angeline is not cloudlike. The angeline is content. The angeline is notable. The angeline subsist the kimberley. The angeline regenerate the kimberley. The kimberley does not eat the angeline. The kimberley is graven. The kimberley is uncombed. The kimberley is cloudlike. The kimberley is notable. The kimberley does not need the angeline. The kimberley regenerate the angeline. If something regenerate the angeline and the angeline lyophilise the kimberley then the angeline regenerate the kimberley. If something is uncombed and it lyophilise the angeline then it subsist the kimberley. If something lyophilise the angeline and the angeline subsist the kimberley then the kimberley is content. If something lyophilise the kimberley then it subsist the angeline. If something regenerate the kimberley then it lyophilise the angeline. If something lyophilise the angeline and the angeline is notable then it is graven. The kimberley is content.", "logic": "\nLyophilise(angeline, kimberley)\nGraven(angeline)\nUncombed(angeline)\nnot Cloudlike(angeline)\nContent(angeline)\nNotable(angeline)\nSubsist(angeline, kimberley)\nRegenerate(angeline, kimberley)\nnot Lyophilise(kimberley, angeline)\nGraven(kimberley)\nUncombed(kimberley)\nCloudlike(kimberley)\nNotable(kimberley)\nnot Subsist(kimberley, angeline)\nRegenerate(kimberley, angeline)\nforall x (Regenerate(x, angeline) and Lyophilise(angeline, kimberley) -> Regenerate(angeline, kimberley))\nforall x (Uncombed(x) and Lyophilise(x, angeline) -> Subsist(x, kimberley))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, angeline) and Subsist(angeline, kimberley) -> Content(kimberley))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, kimberley) -> Subsist(x, angeline))\nforall x (Regenerate(x, kimberley) -> Lyophilise(x, angeline))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, angeline) and Notable(angeline) -> Graven(x))\n\nContent(kimberley)\n\nRegenerate(angeline, kimberley) and forall x (Regenerate(x, kimberley) -> Lyophilise(x, angeline)) -> therefore Lyophilise(angeline, angeline) Lyophilise(angeline, angeline) and Subsist(angeline, kimberley) and forall x (Lyophilise(x, angeline) and Subsist(angeline, kimberley) -> Content(kimberley)) -> therefore Content(kimberley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The claretta delay the elianore. The claretta is inflated. The claretta is queer. The claretta is not brash. The claretta is clever. The claretta is impervious. The claretta cocainize the elianore. The claretta attorn the elianore. The elianore does not eat the claretta. The elianore is inflated. The elianore is queer. The elianore is brash. The elianore is impervious. The elianore does not need the claretta. The elianore attorn the claretta. If something attorn the claretta and the claretta delay the elianore then the claretta attorn the elianore. If something is queer and it delay the claretta then it cocainize the elianore. If something delay the claretta and the claretta cocainize the elianore then the elianore is clever. If something delay the elianore then it cocainize the claretta. If something attorn the elianore then it delay the claretta. If something delay the claretta and the claretta is impervious then it is inflated. The elianore is not clever.", "logic": "\nDelay(claretta, elianore)\nInflated(claretta)\nQueer(claretta)\nnot Brash(claretta)\nClever(claretta)\nImpervious(claretta)\nCocainize(claretta, elianore)\nAttorn(claretta, elianore)\nnot Delay(elianore, claretta)\nInflated(elianore)\nQueer(elianore)\nBrash(elianore)\nImpervious(elianore)\nnot Cocainize(elianore, claretta)\nAttorn(elianore, claretta)\nforall x (Attorn(x, claretta) and Delay(claretta, elianore) -> Attorn(claretta, elianore))\nforall x (Queer(x) and Delay(x, claretta) -> Cocainize(x, elianore))\nforall x (Delay(x, claretta) and Cocainize(claretta, elianore) -> Clever(elianore))\nforall x (Delay(x, elianore) -> Cocainize(x, claretta))\nforall x (Attorn(x, elianore) -> Delay(x, claretta))\nforall x (Delay(x, claretta) and Impervious(claretta) -> Inflated(x))\n\nnot Clever(elianore)\n\nAttorn(claretta, elianore) and forall x (Attorn(x, elianore) -> Delay(x, claretta)) -> therefore Delay(claretta, claretta) Delay(claretta, claretta) and Cocainize(claretta, elianore) and forall x (Delay(x, claretta) and Cocainize(claretta, elianore) -> Clever(elianore)) -> therefore Clever(elianore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The dulciana swage the aron. The dulciana is lymphatic. The dulciana is sham. The dulciana is not lincolnian. The dulciana is fanged. The dulciana is autoimmune. The dulciana federalise the aron. The dulciana yawl the aron. The aron does not eat the dulciana. The aron is lymphatic. The aron is sham. The aron is lincolnian. The aron is autoimmune. The aron does not need the dulciana. The aron yawl the dulciana. If something yawl the dulciana and the dulciana swage the aron then the dulciana yawl the aron. If something is sham and it swage the dulciana then it federalise the aron. If something swage the dulciana and the dulciana federalise the aron then the aron is fanged. If something swage the aron then it federalise the dulciana. If something yawl the aron then it swage the dulciana. If something swage the dulciana and the dulciana is autoimmune then it is lymphatic. The aron does not need the aron.", "logic": "\nSwage(dulciana, aron)\nLymphatic(dulciana)\nSham(dulciana)\nnot Lincolnian(dulciana)\nFanged(dulciana)\nAutoimmune(dulciana)\nFederalise(dulciana, aron)\nYawl(dulciana, aron)\nnot Swage(aron, dulciana)\nLymphatic(aron)\nSham(aron)\nLincolnian(aron)\nAutoimmune(aron)\nnot Federalise(aron, dulciana)\nYawl(aron, dulciana)\nforall x (Yawl(x, dulciana) and Swage(dulciana, aron) -> Yawl(dulciana, aron))\nforall x (Sham(x) and Swage(x, dulciana) -> Federalise(x, aron))\nforall x (Swage(x, dulciana) and Federalise(dulciana, aron) -> Fanged(aron))\nforall x (Swage(x, aron) -> Federalise(x, dulciana))\nforall x (Yawl(x, aron) -> Swage(x, dulciana))\nforall x (Swage(x, dulciana) and Autoimmune(dulciana) -> Lymphatic(x))\n\nnot Federalise(aron, aron)\n\nforall x (Sham(x) and Swage(x, dulciana) -> Federalise(x, aron)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The ron roar the connie. The ron is fistular. The ron is unlivable. The ron is not handsome. The ron is dedicated. The ron is crying. The ron clinker the connie. The ron expend the connie. The connie does not eat the ron. The connie is fistular. The connie is unlivable. The connie is handsome. The connie is crying. The connie does not need the ron. The connie expend the ron. If something expend the ron and the ron roar the connie then the ron expend the connie. If something is unlivable and it roar the ron then it clinker the connie. If something roar the ron and the ron clinker the connie then the connie is dedicated. If something roar the connie then it clinker the ron. If something expend the connie then it roar the ron. If something roar the ron and the ron is crying then it is fistular. The connie expend the connie.", "logic": "\nRoar(ron, connie)\nFistular(ron)\nUnlivable(ron)\nnot Handsome(ron)\nDedicated(ron)\nCrying(ron)\nClinker(ron, connie)\nExpend(ron, connie)\nnot Roar(connie, ron)\nFistular(connie)\nUnlivable(connie)\nHandsome(connie)\nCrying(connie)\nnot Clinker(connie, ron)\nExpend(connie, ron)\nforall x (Expend(x, ron) and Roar(ron, connie) -> Expend(ron, connie))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Roar(x, ron) -> Clinker(x, connie))\nforall x (Roar(x, ron) and Clinker(ron, connie) -> Dedicated(connie))\nforall x (Roar(x, connie) -> Clinker(x, ron))\nforall x (Expend(x, connie) -> Roar(x, ron))\nforall x (Roar(x, ron) and Crying(ron) -> Fistular(x))\n\nExpend(connie, connie)\n\nExpend(connie, connie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The steve stopple the nev. The steve is hypnagogic. The steve is hoofed. The steve is not subtropic. The steve is rancorous. The steve is extrinsic. The steve rescale the nev. The steve attorn the nev. The nev does not eat the steve. The nev is hypnagogic. The nev is hoofed. The nev is subtropic. The nev is extrinsic. The nev does not need the steve. The nev attorn the steve. If something attorn the steve and the steve stopple the nev then the steve attorn the nev. If something is hoofed and it stopple the steve then it rescale the nev. If something stopple the steve and the steve rescale the nev then the nev is rancorous. If something stopple the nev then it rescale the steve. If something attorn the nev then it stopple the steve. If something stopple the steve and the steve is extrinsic then it is hypnagogic. The steve does not visit the steve.", "logic": "\nStopple(steve, nev)\nHypnagogic(steve)\nHoofed(steve)\nnot Subtropic(steve)\nRancorous(steve)\nExtrinsic(steve)\nRescale(steve, nev)\nAttorn(steve, nev)\nnot Stopple(nev, steve)\nHypnagogic(nev)\nHoofed(nev)\nSubtropic(nev)\nExtrinsic(nev)\nnot Rescale(nev, steve)\nAttorn(nev, steve)\nforall x (Attorn(x, steve) and Stopple(steve, nev) -> Attorn(steve, nev))\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Stopple(x, steve) -> Rescale(x, nev))\nforall x (Stopple(x, steve) and Rescale(steve, nev) -> Rancorous(nev))\nforall x (Stopple(x, nev) -> Rescale(x, steve))\nforall x (Attorn(x, nev) -> Stopple(x, steve))\nforall x (Stopple(x, steve) and Extrinsic(steve) -> Hypnagogic(x))\n\nnot Attorn(steve, steve)\n\nnot Attorn(steve, steve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The thorndike operate the rosana. The thorndike is competent. The thorndike is directing. The thorndike is not ballistic. The thorndike is mocking. The thorndike is repressive. The thorndike cross the rosana. The thorndike boldface the rosana. The rosana does not eat the thorndike. The rosana is competent. The rosana is directing. The rosana is ballistic. The rosana is repressive. The rosana does not need the thorndike. The rosana boldface the thorndike. If something boldface the thorndike and the thorndike operate the rosana then the thorndike boldface the rosana. If something is directing and it operate the thorndike then it cross the rosana. If something operate the thorndike and the thorndike cross the rosana then the rosana is mocking. If something operate the rosana then it cross the thorndike. If something boldface the rosana then it operate the thorndike. If something operate the thorndike and the thorndike is repressive then it is competent. The rosana operate the rosana.", "logic": "\nOperate(thorndike, rosana)\nCompetent(thorndike)\nDirecting(thorndike)\nnot Ballistic(thorndike)\nMocking(thorndike)\nRepressive(thorndike)\nCross(thorndike, rosana)\nBoldface(thorndike, rosana)\nnot Operate(rosana, thorndike)\nCompetent(rosana)\nDirecting(rosana)\nBallistic(rosana)\nRepressive(rosana)\nnot Cross(rosana, thorndike)\nBoldface(rosana, thorndike)\nforall x (Boldface(x, thorndike) and Operate(thorndike, rosana) -> Boldface(thorndike, rosana))\nforall x (Directing(x) and Operate(x, thorndike) -> Cross(x, rosana))\nforall x (Operate(x, thorndike) and Cross(thorndike, rosana) -> Mocking(rosana))\nforall x (Operate(x, rosana) -> Cross(x, thorndike))\nforall x (Boldface(x, rosana) -> Operate(x, thorndike))\nforall x (Operate(x, thorndike) and Repressive(thorndike) -> Competent(x))\n\nOperate(rosana, rosana)\n\nOperate(rosana, rosana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1502"} {"premises": "The tricia is calyptrate. If the tricia is calyptrate then the tricia is uptight. If someone is uptight then they are untipped. The tricia is calyptrate.", "logic": "\nCalyptrate(tricia)\nCalyptrate(tricia) -> Uptight(tricia)\nforall x (Uptight(x) -> Untipped(x))\n\nCalyptrate(tricia)\n\ntherefore Calyptrate(tricia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The poppy is fiduciary. If the poppy is fiduciary then the poppy is enhanced. If someone is enhanced then they are stuck. The poppy is not fiduciary.", "logic": "\nFiduciary(poppy)\nFiduciary(poppy) -> Enhanced(poppy)\nforall x (Enhanced(x) -> Stuck(x))\n\nnot Fiduciary(poppy)\n\ntherefore Fiduciary(poppy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The douglis is dumfounded. If the douglis is dumfounded then the douglis is bellying. If someone is bellying then they are movable. The douglis is bellying.", "logic": "\nDumfounded(douglis)\nDumfounded(douglis) -> Bellying(douglis)\nforall x (Bellying(x) -> Movable(x))\n\nBellying(douglis)\n\nDumfounded(douglis) and Dumfounded(douglis) -> Bellying(douglis) -> therefore Bellying(douglis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The norris is monumental. If the norris is monumental then the norris is twisting. If someone is twisting then they are corked. The norris is not twisting.", "logic": "\nMonumental(norris)\nMonumental(norris) -> Twisting(norris)\nforall x (Twisting(x) -> Corked(x))\n\nnot Twisting(norris)\n\nMonumental(norris) and Monumental(norris) -> Twisting(norris) -> therefore Twisting(norris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The toma is congolese. If the toma is congolese then the toma is jittering. If someone is jittering then they are syndetic. The toma is syndetic.", "logic": "\nCongolese(toma)\nCongolese(toma) -> Jittering(toma)\nforall x (Jittering(x) -> Syndetic(x))\n\nSyndetic(toma)\n\nCongolese(toma) and Congolese(toma) -> Jittering(toma) -> therefore Jittering(toma) Jittering(toma) and forall x (Jittering(x) -> Syndetic(x)) -> therefore Syndetic(toma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The muffin is blebbed. If the muffin is blebbed then the muffin is noduled. If someone is noduled then they are surrounded. The muffin is not surrounded.", "logic": "\nBlebbed(muffin)\nBlebbed(muffin) -> Noduled(muffin)\nforall x (Noduled(x) -> Surrounded(x))\n\nnot Surrounded(muffin)\n\nBlebbed(muffin) and Blebbed(muffin) -> Noduled(muffin) -> therefore Noduled(muffin) Noduled(muffin) and forall x (Noduled(x) -> Surrounded(x)) -> therefore Surrounded(muffin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The ardelis is charmed. If the ardelis is charmed then the ardelis is topknotted. If someone is topknotted then they are dendritic. The ardelis does not see the ardelis.", "logic": "\nCharmed(ardelis)\nCharmed(ardelis) -> Topknotted(ardelis)\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Dendritic(x))\n\nnot Sees(ardelis, ardelis)\n\nnot Sees(ardelis, ardelis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The mortimer is beardless. If the mortimer is beardless then the mortimer is tzarist. If someone is tzarist then they are kept. The mortimer eats the mortimer.", "logic": "\nBeardless(mortimer)\nBeardless(mortimer) -> Tzarist(mortimer)\nforall x (Tzarist(x) -> Kept(x))\n\nEats(mortimer, mortimer)\n\nEats(mortimer, mortimer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The helen is risible. If the helen is risible then the helen is lentiform. If someone is lentiform then they are ungreased. The helen does not visit the helen.", "logic": "\nRisible(helen)\nRisible(helen) -> Lentiform(helen)\nforall x (Lentiform(x) -> Ungreased(x))\n\nnot Visits(helen, helen)\n\nnot Visits(helen, helen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "The melisenda is anesthetic. If the melisenda is anesthetic then the melisenda is actionable. If someone is actionable then they are geodesic. The melisenda is green.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(melisenda)\nAnesthetic(melisenda) -> Actionable(melisenda)\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Geodesic(x))\n\nGreen(melisenda)\n\nGreen(melisenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1444"} {"premises": "Angy is pendant. Gerladina is glistering. Gerladina is snuff. If someone is masoretic then they are alveolar. Nice people are masoretic. Gerladina is glistering.", "logic": "\nPendant(angy)\nGlistering(gerladina)\nSnuff(gerladina)\nforall x (Masoretic(x) -> Alveolar(x))\nforall x (Glistering(x) -> Masoretic(x))\n\nGlistering(gerladina)\n\ntherefore Glistering(gerladina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Maridel is indonesian. Vanny is planktonic. Vanny is bicolor. If someone is louvered then they are stung. Nice people are louvered. Vanny is not bicolor.", "logic": "\nIndonesian(maridel)\nPlanktonic(vanny)\nBicolor(vanny)\nforall x (Louvered(x) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Planktonic(x) -> Louvered(x))\n\nnot Bicolor(vanny)\n\ntherefore Bicolor(vanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Sherye is pudgy. Garrott is rattling. Garrott is cocky. If someone is dipped then they are ridged. Nice people are dipped. Garrott is dipped.", "logic": "\nPudgy(sherye)\nRattling(garrott)\nCocky(garrott)\nforall x (Dipped(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Rattling(x) -> Dipped(x))\n\nDipped(garrott)\n\nRattling(garrott) and forall x (Rattling(x) -> Dipped(x)) -> therefore Dipped(garrott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Fey is bedraggled. Orelia is banned. Orelia is latent. If someone is elliptical then they are gamy. Nice people are elliptical. Orelia is not elliptical.", "logic": "\nBedraggled(fey)\nBanned(orelia)\nLatent(orelia)\nforall x (Elliptical(x) -> Gamy(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Elliptical(x))\n\nnot Elliptical(orelia)\n\nBanned(orelia) and forall x (Banned(x) -> Elliptical(x)) -> therefore Elliptical(orelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Carmelita is categoric. Jacquelyn is extendable. Jacquelyn is conversant. If someone is geologic then they are dignifying. Nice people are geologic. Jacquelyn is dignifying.", "logic": "\nCategoric(carmelita)\nExtendable(jacquelyn)\nConversant(jacquelyn)\nforall x (Geologic(x) -> Dignifying(x))\nforall x (Extendable(x) -> Geologic(x))\n\nDignifying(jacquelyn)\n\nExtendable(jacquelyn) and forall x (Extendable(x) -> Geologic(x)) -> therefore Geologic(jacquelyn) Geologic(jacquelyn) and forall x (Geologic(x) -> Dignifying(x)) -> therefore Dignifying(jacquelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Kali is euphoric. Allissa is stellate. Allissa is carangid. If someone is hierarchal then they are regretful. Nice people are hierarchal. Allissa is not regretful.", "logic": "\nEuphoric(kali)\nStellate(allissa)\nCarangid(allissa)\nforall x (Hierarchal(x) -> Regretful(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Hierarchal(x))\n\nnot Regretful(allissa)\n\nStellate(allissa) and forall x (Stellate(x) -> Hierarchal(x)) -> therefore Hierarchal(allissa) Hierarchal(allissa) and forall x (Hierarchal(x) -> Regretful(x)) -> therefore Regretful(allissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Belle is gusseted. Bjorn is fallacious. Bjorn is dorsal. If someone is glottal then they are unnoticed. Nice people are glottal. Belle is not glottal.", "logic": "\nGusseted(belle)\nFallacious(bjorn)\nDorsal(bjorn)\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Unnoticed(x))\nforall x (Fallacious(x) -> Glottal(x))\n\nnot Glottal(belle)\n\nforall x (Fallacious(x) -> Glottal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Marisa is pastoral. Lem is beguiled. Lem is plumed. If someone is tepid then they are susurrant. Nice people are tepid. Marisa is susurrant.", "logic": "\nPastoral(marisa)\nBeguiled(lem)\nPlumed(lem)\nforall x (Tepid(x) -> Susurrant(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> Tepid(x))\n\nSusurrant(marisa)\n\nforall x (Tepid(x) -> Susurrant(x)) <- forall x (Beguiled(x) -> Tepid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Stew is honorific. Terrye is iterative. Terrye is squarish. If someone is dubitable then they are huffish. Nice people are dubitable. Stew is not squarish.", "logic": "\nHonorific(stew)\nIterative(terrye)\nSquarish(terrye)\nforall x (Dubitable(x) -> Huffish(x))\nforall x (Iterative(x) -> Dubitable(x))\n\nnot Squarish(stew)\n\nnot Squarish(stew) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Shamus is uniate. Douglass is nodulated. Douglass is ordinary. If someone is undershot then they are defined. Nice people are undershot. Douglass is uniate.", "logic": "\nUniate(shamus)\nNodulated(douglass)\nOrdinary(douglass)\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Undershot(x))\n\nUniate(douglass)\n\nUniate(douglass) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Asia is undercover. Kira is canopied. Kira is duodecimal. If someone is immunized then they are anserine. Nice people are immunized. Kira is not furry.", "logic": "\nUndercover(asia)\nCanopied(kira)\nDuodecimal(kira)\nforall x (Immunized(x) -> Anserine(x))\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> Immunized(x))\n\nnot Furry(kira)\n\nnot Furry(kira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Lyndon is misogynous. Janka is cogent. Janka is polyvalent. If someone is unfit then they are creepy. Nice people are unfit. Lyndon is furry.", "logic": "\nMisogynous(lyndon)\nCogent(janka)\nPolyvalent(janka)\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Creepy(x))\nforall x (Cogent(x) -> Unfit(x))\n\nFurry(lyndon)\n\nFurry(lyndon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Oliver is siliceous. Oliver is detected. Oliver is connatural. Ulrick is siliceous. Ulrick is connatural. Ulrick is degrading. Farah is siliceous. Farah is continual. Farah is connatural. Farah is void. Farah is degrading. Garcon is siliceous. Garcon is esurient. Garcon is not detected. Garcon is connatural. Garcon is void. White, degrading people are siliceous. If Ulrick is continual then Ulrick is connatural. All continual people are esurient. If someone is esurient and detected then they are void. Young people are connatural. All esurient, siliceous people are not detected. Ulrick is connatural.", "logic": "\nSiliceous(oliver)\nDetected(oliver)\nConnatural(oliver)\nSiliceous(ulrick)\nConnatural(ulrick)\nDegrading(ulrick)\nSiliceous(farah)\nContinual(farah)\nConnatural(farah)\nVoid(farah)\nDegrading(farah)\nSiliceous(garcon)\nEsurient(garcon)\nnot Detected(garcon)\nConnatural(garcon)\nVoid(garcon)\nforall x (Void(x) and Degrading(x) -> Siliceous(x))\nContinual(ulrick) -> Connatural(ulrick)\nforall x (Continual(x) -> Esurient(x))\nforall x (Esurient(x) and Detected(x) -> Void(x))\nforall x (Degrading(x) -> Connatural(x))\nforall x (Esurient(x) and Siliceous(x) -> not Detected(x))\n\nConnatural(ulrick)\n\ntherefore Connatural(ulrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Nanice is cadenced. Nanice is lukewarm. Nanice is uncapped. Yovonnda is cadenced. Yovonnda is uncapped. Yovonnda is malign. Peyton is cadenced. Peyton is unfilmed. Peyton is uncapped. Peyton is destined. Peyton is malign. Lyndell is cadenced. Lyndell is inerrable. Lyndell is not lukewarm. Lyndell is uncapped. Lyndell is destined. White, malign people are cadenced. If Yovonnda is unfilmed then Yovonnda is uncapped. All unfilmed people are inerrable. If someone is inerrable and lukewarm then they are destined. Young people are uncapped. All inerrable, cadenced people are not lukewarm. Peyton is not malign.", "logic": "\nCadenced(nanice)\nLukewarm(nanice)\nUncapped(nanice)\nCadenced(yovonnda)\nUncapped(yovonnda)\nMalign(yovonnda)\nCadenced(peyton)\nUnfilmed(peyton)\nUncapped(peyton)\nDestined(peyton)\nMalign(peyton)\nCadenced(lyndell)\nInerrable(lyndell)\nnot Lukewarm(lyndell)\nUncapped(lyndell)\nDestined(lyndell)\nforall x (Destined(x) and Malign(x) -> Cadenced(x))\nUnfilmed(yovonnda) -> Uncapped(yovonnda)\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Inerrable(x))\nforall x (Inerrable(x) and Lukewarm(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Inerrable(x) and Cadenced(x) -> not Lukewarm(x))\n\nnot Malign(peyton)\n\ntherefore Malign(peyton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Carsten is spastic. Carsten is piffling. Carsten is voluble. Sukey is spastic. Sukey is voluble. Sukey is drowsy. Kare is spastic. Kare is hefty. Kare is voluble. Kare is rust. Kare is drowsy. Quinlan is spastic. Quinlan is frustrated. Quinlan is not piffling. Quinlan is voluble. Quinlan is rust. White, drowsy people are spastic. If Sukey is hefty then Sukey is voluble. All hefty people are frustrated. If someone is frustrated and piffling then they are rust. Young people are voluble. All frustrated, spastic people are not piffling. Kare is frustrated.", "logic": "\nSpastic(carsten)\nPiffling(carsten)\nVoluble(carsten)\nSpastic(sukey)\nVoluble(sukey)\nDrowsy(sukey)\nSpastic(kare)\nHefty(kare)\nVoluble(kare)\nRust(kare)\nDrowsy(kare)\nSpastic(quinlan)\nFrustrated(quinlan)\nnot Piffling(quinlan)\nVoluble(quinlan)\nRust(quinlan)\nforall x (Rust(x) and Drowsy(x) -> Spastic(x))\nHefty(sukey) -> Voluble(sukey)\nforall x (Hefty(x) -> Frustrated(x))\nforall x (Frustrated(x) and Piffling(x) -> Rust(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) -> Voluble(x))\nforall x (Frustrated(x) and Spastic(x) -> not Piffling(x))\n\nFrustrated(kare)\n\nHefty(kare) and forall x (Hefty(x) -> Frustrated(x)) -> therefore Frustrated(kare)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Nalani is anoestrous. Nalani is numerable. Nalani is levorotary. Fayina is anoestrous. Fayina is levorotary. Fayina is saline. Jude is anoestrous. Jude is pestilent. Jude is levorotary. Jude is modular. Jude is saline. Cornellis is anoestrous. Cornellis is unnotched. Cornellis is not numerable. Cornellis is levorotary. Cornellis is modular. White, saline people are anoestrous. If Fayina is pestilent then Fayina is levorotary. All pestilent people are unnotched. If someone is unnotched and numerable then they are modular. Young people are levorotary. All unnotched, anoestrous people are not numerable. Jude is not unnotched.", "logic": "\nAnoestrous(nalani)\nNumerable(nalani)\nLevorotary(nalani)\nAnoestrous(fayina)\nLevorotary(fayina)\nSaline(fayina)\nAnoestrous(jude)\nPestilent(jude)\nLevorotary(jude)\nModular(jude)\nSaline(jude)\nAnoestrous(cornellis)\nUnnotched(cornellis)\nnot Numerable(cornellis)\nLevorotary(cornellis)\nModular(cornellis)\nforall x (Modular(x) and Saline(x) -> Anoestrous(x))\nPestilent(fayina) -> Levorotary(fayina)\nforall x (Pestilent(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Unnotched(x) and Numerable(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Saline(x) -> Levorotary(x))\nforall x (Unnotched(x) and Anoestrous(x) -> not Numerable(x))\n\nnot Unnotched(jude)\n\nPestilent(jude) and forall x (Pestilent(x) -> Unnotched(x)) -> therefore Unnotched(jude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Wendi is inventive. Wendi is sessile. Wendi is deft. Iggy is inventive. Iggy is deft. Iggy is ramate. Guthry is inventive. Guthry is shrunken. Guthry is deft. Guthry is lowercase. Guthry is ramate. Bendite is inventive. Bendite is erratic. Bendite is not sessile. Bendite is deft. Bendite is lowercase. White, ramate people are inventive. If Iggy is shrunken then Iggy is deft. All shrunken people are erratic. If someone is erratic and sessile then they are lowercase. Young people are deft. All erratic, inventive people are not sessile. Guthry is not sessile.", "logic": "\nInventive(wendi)\nSessile(wendi)\nDeft(wendi)\nInventive(iggy)\nDeft(iggy)\nRamate(iggy)\nInventive(guthry)\nShrunken(guthry)\nDeft(guthry)\nLowercase(guthry)\nRamate(guthry)\nInventive(bendite)\nErratic(bendite)\nnot Sessile(bendite)\nDeft(bendite)\nLowercase(bendite)\nforall x (Lowercase(x) and Ramate(x) -> Inventive(x))\nShrunken(iggy) -> Deft(iggy)\nforall x (Shrunken(x) -> Erratic(x))\nforall x (Erratic(x) and Sessile(x) -> Lowercase(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Erratic(x) and Inventive(x) -> not Sessile(x))\n\nnot Sessile(guthry)\n\nShrunken(guthry) and forall x (Shrunken(x) -> Erratic(x)) -> therefore Erratic(guthry) Erratic(guthry) and Inventive(guthry) and forall x (Erratic(x) and Inventive(x) -> not Sessile(x)) -> therefore not Sessile(guthry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Kristan is afraid. Kristan is answerable. Kristan is hiemal. Clancy is afraid. Clancy is hiemal. Clancy is parlous. Wyn is afraid. Wyn is chesty. Wyn is hiemal. Wyn is multistory. Wyn is parlous. Bea is afraid. Bea is submarine. Bea is not answerable. Bea is hiemal. Bea is multistory. White, parlous people are afraid. If Clancy is chesty then Clancy is hiemal. All chesty people are submarine. If someone is submarine and answerable then they are multistory. Young people are hiemal. All submarine, afraid people are not answerable. Wyn is answerable.", "logic": "\nAfraid(kristan)\nAnswerable(kristan)\nHiemal(kristan)\nAfraid(clancy)\nHiemal(clancy)\nParlous(clancy)\nAfraid(wyn)\nChesty(wyn)\nHiemal(wyn)\nMultistory(wyn)\nParlous(wyn)\nAfraid(bea)\nSubmarine(bea)\nnot Answerable(bea)\nHiemal(bea)\nMultistory(bea)\nforall x (Multistory(x) and Parlous(x) -> Afraid(x))\nChesty(clancy) -> Hiemal(clancy)\nforall x (Chesty(x) -> Submarine(x))\nforall x (Submarine(x) and Answerable(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Parlous(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Submarine(x) and Afraid(x) -> not Answerable(x))\n\nAnswerable(wyn)\n\nChesty(wyn) and forall x (Chesty(x) -> Submarine(x)) -> therefore Submarine(wyn) Submarine(wyn) and Afraid(wyn) and forall x (Submarine(x) and Afraid(x) -> not Answerable(x)) -> therefore not Answerable(wyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Sile is aflicker. Sile is unwary. Sile is realised. Hyacinthe is aflicker. Hyacinthe is realised. Hyacinthe is worsening. Caryl is aflicker. Caryl is monotonous. Caryl is realised. Caryl is tepid. Caryl is worsening. Kay is aflicker. Kay is unshakable. Kay is not unwary. Kay is realised. Kay is tepid. White, worsening people are aflicker. If Hyacinthe is monotonous then Hyacinthe is realised. All monotonous people are unshakable. If someone is unshakable and unwary then they are tepid. Young people are realised. All unshakable, aflicker people are not unwary. Hyacinthe is not tepid.", "logic": "\nAflicker(sile)\nUnwary(sile)\nRealised(sile)\nAflicker(hyacinthe)\nRealised(hyacinthe)\nWorsening(hyacinthe)\nAflicker(caryl)\nMonotonous(caryl)\nRealised(caryl)\nTepid(caryl)\nWorsening(caryl)\nAflicker(kay)\nUnshakable(kay)\nnot Unwary(kay)\nRealised(kay)\nTepid(kay)\nforall x (Tepid(x) and Worsening(x) -> Aflicker(x))\nMonotonous(hyacinthe) -> Realised(hyacinthe)\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> Unshakable(x))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) and Unwary(x) -> Tepid(x))\nforall x (Worsening(x) -> Realised(x))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) and Aflicker(x) -> not Unwary(x))\n\nnot Tepid(hyacinthe)\n\nforall x (Unshakable(x) and Unwary(x) -> Tepid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Sonnnie is horrid. Sonnnie is nurtural. Sonnnie is stilted. Garvy is horrid. Garvy is stilted. Garvy is vapourous. Ferdy is horrid. Ferdy is cruel. Ferdy is stilted. Ferdy is mistaken. Ferdy is vapourous. Davide is horrid. Davide is choppy. Davide is not nurtural. Davide is stilted. Davide is mistaken. White, vapourous people are horrid. If Garvy is cruel then Garvy is stilted. All cruel people are choppy. If someone is choppy and nurtural then they are mistaken. Young people are stilted. All choppy, horrid people are not nurtural. Sonnnie is mistaken.", "logic": "\nHorrid(sonnnie)\nNurtural(sonnnie)\nStilted(sonnnie)\nHorrid(garvy)\nStilted(garvy)\nVapourous(garvy)\nHorrid(ferdy)\nCruel(ferdy)\nStilted(ferdy)\nMistaken(ferdy)\nVapourous(ferdy)\nHorrid(davide)\nChoppy(davide)\nnot Nurtural(davide)\nStilted(davide)\nMistaken(davide)\nforall x (Mistaken(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Horrid(x))\nCruel(garvy) -> Stilted(garvy)\nforall x (Cruel(x) -> Choppy(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) and Nurtural(x) -> Mistaken(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) and Horrid(x) -> not Nurtural(x))\n\nMistaken(sonnnie)\n\nforall x (Choppy(x) and Nurtural(x) -> Mistaken(x)) <- forall x (Cruel(x) -> Choppy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Marena is undreamt. Marena is overhasty. Marena is estrogenic. Erena is undreamt. Erena is estrogenic. Erena is apelike. Lizzy is undreamt. Lizzy is nubile. Lizzy is estrogenic. Lizzy is unpainted. Lizzy is apelike. Tibold is undreamt. Tibold is principled. Tibold is not overhasty. Tibold is estrogenic. Tibold is unpainted. White, apelike people are undreamt. If Erena is nubile then Erena is estrogenic. All nubile people are principled. If someone is principled and overhasty then they are unpainted. Young people are estrogenic. All principled, undreamt people are not overhasty. Marena is not principled.", "logic": "\nUndreamt(marena)\nOverhasty(marena)\nEstrogenic(marena)\nUndreamt(erena)\nEstrogenic(erena)\nApelike(erena)\nUndreamt(lizzy)\nNubile(lizzy)\nEstrogenic(lizzy)\nUnpainted(lizzy)\nApelike(lizzy)\nUndreamt(tibold)\nPrincipled(tibold)\nnot Overhasty(tibold)\nEstrogenic(tibold)\nUnpainted(tibold)\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Apelike(x) -> Undreamt(x))\nNubile(erena) -> Estrogenic(erena)\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Principled(x))\nforall x (Principled(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Unpainted(x))\nforall x (Apelike(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Principled(x) and Undreamt(x) -> not Overhasty(x))\n\nnot Principled(marena)\n\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Principled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Chrystel is itinerant. Chrystel is spurting. Chrystel is bugged. Faythe is itinerant. Faythe is bugged. Faythe is choragic. Lisetta is itinerant. Lisetta is blase. Lisetta is bugged. Lisetta is corsican. Lisetta is choragic. Guthrey is itinerant. Guthrey is nepali. Guthrey is not spurting. Guthrey is bugged. Guthrey is corsican. White, choragic people are itinerant. If Faythe is blase then Faythe is bugged. All blase people are nepali. If someone is nepali and spurting then they are corsican. Young people are bugged. All nepali, itinerant people are not spurting. Guthrey is choragic.", "logic": "\nItinerant(chrystel)\nSpurting(chrystel)\nBugged(chrystel)\nItinerant(faythe)\nBugged(faythe)\nChoragic(faythe)\nItinerant(lisetta)\nBlase(lisetta)\nBugged(lisetta)\nCorsican(lisetta)\nChoragic(lisetta)\nItinerant(guthrey)\nNepali(guthrey)\nnot Spurting(guthrey)\nBugged(guthrey)\nCorsican(guthrey)\nforall x (Corsican(x) and Choragic(x) -> Itinerant(x))\nBlase(faythe) -> Bugged(faythe)\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Nepali(x))\nforall x (Nepali(x) and Spurting(x) -> Corsican(x))\nforall x (Choragic(x) -> Bugged(x))\nforall x (Nepali(x) and Itinerant(x) -> not Spurting(x))\n\nChoragic(guthrey)\n\nChoragic(guthrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Burt is zoic. Burt is unfunded. Burt is funerary. Aleks is zoic. Aleks is funerary. Aleks is ultimate. Carolie is zoic. Carolie is gutless. Carolie is funerary. Carolie is drifting. Carolie is ultimate. Anissa is zoic. Anissa is zoological. Anissa is not unfunded. Anissa is funerary. Anissa is drifting. White, ultimate people are zoic. If Aleks is gutless then Aleks is funerary. All gutless people are zoological. If someone is zoological and unfunded then they are drifting. Young people are funerary. All zoological, zoic people are not unfunded. Burt is not gutless.", "logic": "\nZoic(burt)\nUnfunded(burt)\nFunerary(burt)\nZoic(aleks)\nFunerary(aleks)\nUltimate(aleks)\nZoic(carolie)\nGutless(carolie)\nFunerary(carolie)\nDrifting(carolie)\nUltimate(carolie)\nZoic(anissa)\nZoological(anissa)\nnot Unfunded(anissa)\nFunerary(anissa)\nDrifting(anissa)\nforall x (Drifting(x) and Ultimate(x) -> Zoic(x))\nGutless(aleks) -> Funerary(aleks)\nforall x (Gutless(x) -> Zoological(x))\nforall x (Zoological(x) and Unfunded(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) -> Funerary(x))\nforall x (Zoological(x) and Zoic(x) -> not Unfunded(x))\n\nnot Gutless(burt)\n\nnot Gutless(burt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Siouxie is effulgent. Siouxie is neuronal. Siouxie is sadducean. Henri is effulgent. Henri is sadducean. Henri is venerating. Kimmo is effulgent. Kimmo is polytonal. Kimmo is sadducean. Kimmo is born. Kimmo is venerating. Davina is effulgent. Davina is ischemic. Davina is not neuronal. Davina is sadducean. Davina is born. White, venerating people are effulgent. If Henri is polytonal then Henri is sadducean. All polytonal people are ischemic. If someone is ischemic and neuronal then they are born. Young people are sadducean. All ischemic, effulgent people are not neuronal. Davina is polytonal.", "logic": "\nEffulgent(siouxie)\nNeuronal(siouxie)\nSadducean(siouxie)\nEffulgent(henri)\nSadducean(henri)\nVenerating(henri)\nEffulgent(kimmo)\nPolytonal(kimmo)\nSadducean(kimmo)\nBorn(kimmo)\nVenerating(kimmo)\nEffulgent(davina)\nIschemic(davina)\nnot Neuronal(davina)\nSadducean(davina)\nBorn(davina)\nforall x (Born(x) and Venerating(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nPolytonal(henri) -> Sadducean(henri)\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Ischemic(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) and Neuronal(x) -> Born(x))\nforall x (Venerating(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) and Effulgent(x) -> not Neuronal(x))\n\nPolytonal(davina)\n\nPolytonal(davina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-904"} {"premises": "Leann is versatile. Chet is not solidified. Carmita is benzylic. Xylina is imbecile. Round people are pledged. If someone is fahrenheit and ultra then they are pledged. All versatile people are ultra. If someone is ultra and pledged then they are fahrenheit. Round, fahrenheit people are imbecile. If someone is ultra and not fahrenheit then they are imbecile. Xylina is imbecile.", "logic": "\nVersatile(leann)\nnot Solidified(chet)\nBenzylic(carmita)\nImbecile(xylina)\nforall x (Ultra(x) -> Pledged(x))\nforall x (Fahrenheit(x) and Ultra(x) -> Pledged(x))\nforall x (Versatile(x) -> Ultra(x))\nforall x (Ultra(x) and Pledged(x) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nforall x (Ultra(x) and Fahrenheit(x) -> Imbecile(x))\nforall x (Ultra(x) and not Fahrenheit(x) -> Imbecile(x))\n\nImbecile(xylina)\n\ntherefore Imbecile(xylina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Norina is cadastral. Fraser is not ancillary. Bobina is poised. Gabi is haemolytic. Round people are squalid. If someone is insistent and catchy then they are squalid. All cadastral people are catchy. If someone is catchy and squalid then they are insistent. Round, insistent people are haemolytic. If someone is catchy and not insistent then they are haemolytic. Bobina is not poised.", "logic": "\nCadastral(norina)\nnot Ancillary(fraser)\nPoised(bobina)\nHaemolytic(gabi)\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) and Catchy(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Cadastral(x) -> Catchy(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and Squalid(x) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and Insistent(x) -> Haemolytic(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and not Insistent(x) -> Haemolytic(x))\n\nnot Poised(bobina)\n\ntherefore Poised(bobina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Frederica is multilane. Gustave is not patched. Idalia is upcountry. Aube is alimental. Round people are dimmed. If someone is ungulated and oracular then they are dimmed. All multilane people are oracular. If someone is oracular and dimmed then they are ungulated. Round, ungulated people are alimental. If someone is oracular and not ungulated then they are alimental. Frederica is oracular.", "logic": "\nMultilane(frederica)\nnot Patched(gustave)\nUpcountry(idalia)\nAlimental(aube)\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Ungulated(x) and Oracular(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Oracular(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) and Dimmed(x) -> Ungulated(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) and Ungulated(x) -> Alimental(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) and not Ungulated(x) -> Alimental(x))\n\nOracular(frederica)\n\nMultilane(frederica) and forall x (Multilane(x) -> Oracular(x)) -> therefore Oracular(frederica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Juditha is crookback. Alberto is not ghoulish. Farah is suspensive. Aggi is setose. Round people are wolflike. If someone is unrhythmic and vagrant then they are wolflike. All crookback people are vagrant. If someone is vagrant and wolflike then they are unrhythmic. Round, unrhythmic people are setose. If someone is vagrant and not unrhythmic then they are setose. Juditha is not vagrant.", "logic": "\nCrookback(juditha)\nnot Ghoulish(alberto)\nSuspensive(farah)\nSetose(aggi)\nforall x (Vagrant(x) -> Wolflike(x))\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) and Vagrant(x) -> Wolflike(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and Wolflike(x) -> Unrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and Unrhythmic(x) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and not Unrhythmic(x) -> Setose(x))\n\nnot Vagrant(juditha)\n\nCrookback(juditha) and forall x (Crookback(x) -> Vagrant(x)) -> therefore Vagrant(juditha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Andri is awestruck. Rosabel is not antifungal. Janette is beginning. Gunvor is dowdy. Round people are cretaceous. If someone is triumphal and dashed then they are cretaceous. All awestruck people are dashed. If someone is dashed and cretaceous then they are triumphal. Round, triumphal people are dowdy. If someone is dashed and not triumphal then they are dowdy. Andri is cretaceous.", "logic": "\nAwestruck(andri)\nnot Antifungal(rosabel)\nBeginning(janette)\nDowdy(gunvor)\nforall x (Dashed(x) -> Cretaceous(x))\nforall x (Triumphal(x) and Dashed(x) -> Cretaceous(x))\nforall x (Awestruck(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) and Cretaceous(x) -> Triumphal(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) and Triumphal(x) -> Dowdy(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) and not Triumphal(x) -> Dowdy(x))\n\nCretaceous(andri)\n\nAwestruck(andri) and forall x (Awestruck(x) -> Dashed(x)) -> therefore Dashed(andri) Dashed(andri) and forall x (Dashed(x) -> Cretaceous(x)) -> therefore Cretaceous(andri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Mohan is trivalent. Lorna is not hermitic. Sallie is different. Harmon is demode. Round people are drooping. If someone is barefooted and small then they are drooping. All trivalent people are small. If someone is small and drooping then they are barefooted. Round, barefooted people are demode. If someone is small and not barefooted then they are demode. Mohan is not drooping.", "logic": "\nTrivalent(mohan)\nnot Hermitic(lorna)\nDifferent(sallie)\nDemode(harmon)\nforall x (Small(x) -> Drooping(x))\nforall x (Barefooted(x) and Small(x) -> Drooping(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Drooping(x) -> Barefooted(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Barefooted(x) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and not Barefooted(x) -> Demode(x))\n\nnot Drooping(mohan)\n\nTrivalent(mohan) and forall x (Trivalent(x) -> Small(x)) -> therefore Small(mohan) Small(mohan) and forall x (Small(x) -> Drooping(x)) -> therefore Drooping(mohan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Rana is inboard. Troy is not capitate. Janna is adsorbent. Marge is talentless. Round people are stumpy. If someone is secure and headless then they are stumpy. All inboard people are headless. If someone is headless and stumpy then they are secure. Round, secure people are talentless. If someone is headless and not secure then they are talentless. Janna is not stumpy.", "logic": "\nInboard(rana)\nnot Capitate(troy)\nAdsorbent(janna)\nTalentless(marge)\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nforall x (Secure(x) and Headless(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> Headless(x))\nforall x (Headless(x) and Stumpy(x) -> Secure(x))\nforall x (Headless(x) and Secure(x) -> Talentless(x))\nforall x (Headless(x) and not Secure(x) -> Talentless(x))\n\nnot Stumpy(janna)\n\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Stumpy(x)) <- forall x (Inboard(x) -> Headless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Meira is unfocused. Reese is not hertzian. Terrance is synoicous. Jany is pregnant. Round people are poignant. If someone is liberal and ordained then they are poignant. All unfocused people are ordained. If someone is ordained and poignant then they are liberal. Round, liberal people are pregnant. If someone is ordained and not liberal then they are pregnant. Reese is pregnant.", "logic": "\nUnfocused(meira)\nnot Hertzian(reese)\nSynoicous(terrance)\nPregnant(jany)\nforall x (Ordained(x) -> Poignant(x))\nforall x (Liberal(x) and Ordained(x) -> Poignant(x))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) -> Ordained(x))\nforall x (Ordained(x) and Poignant(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Ordained(x) and Liberal(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Ordained(x) and not Liberal(x) -> Pregnant(x))\n\nPregnant(reese)\n\nforall x (Ordained(x) and Liberal(x) -> Pregnant(x)) <- forall x (Unfocused(x) -> Ordained(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Liane is noticeable. Janeczka is not unfocussed. Wenona is penetrable. Adelice is inner. Round people are forficate. If someone is crinkled and alabaster then they are forficate. All noticeable people are alabaster. If someone is alabaster and forficate then they are crinkled. Round, crinkled people are inner. If someone is alabaster and not crinkled then they are inner. Adelice is not forficate.", "logic": "\nNoticeable(liane)\nnot Unfocussed(janeczka)\nPenetrable(wenona)\nInner(adelice)\nforall x (Alabaster(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Crinkled(x) and Alabaster(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Alabaster(x))\nforall x (Alabaster(x) and Forficate(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Alabaster(x) and Crinkled(x) -> Inner(x))\nforall x (Alabaster(x) and not Crinkled(x) -> Inner(x))\n\nnot Forficate(adelice)\n\nforall x (Alabaster(x) -> Forficate(x)) <- forall x (Noticeable(x) -> Alabaster(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Sonnnie is staring. Ciel is not objective. Marilin is curly. Ketty is stomachic. Round people are delphian. If someone is chylous and farther then they are delphian. All staring people are farther. If someone is farther and delphian then they are chylous. Round, chylous people are stomachic. If someone is farther and not chylous then they are stomachic. Ciel is staring.", "logic": "\nStaring(sonnnie)\nnot Objective(ciel)\nCurly(marilin)\nStomachic(ketty)\nforall x (Farther(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) and Farther(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Staring(x) -> Farther(x))\nforall x (Farther(x) and Delphian(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Farther(x) and Chylous(x) -> Stomachic(x))\nforall x (Farther(x) and not Chylous(x) -> Stomachic(x))\n\nStaring(ciel)\n\nStaring(ciel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Lettie is hastate. Dawna is not freckled. Marthe is organismal. Sapphira is ignitible. Round people are betting. If someone is awestruck and pessimal then they are betting. All hastate people are pessimal. If someone is pessimal and betting then they are awestruck. Round, awestruck people are ignitible. If someone is pessimal and not awestruck then they are ignitible. Marthe is not hastate.", "logic": "\nHastate(lettie)\nnot Freckled(dawna)\nOrganismal(marthe)\nIgnitible(sapphira)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Awestruck(x) and Pessimal(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Hastate(x) -> Pessimal(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Betting(x) -> Awestruck(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Awestruck(x) -> Ignitible(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and not Awestruck(x) -> Ignitible(x))\n\nnot Hastate(marthe)\n\nnot Hastate(marthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Adriena is aegean. Piotr is not bombproof. Gita is seedless. Arie is martian. Round people are miniature. If someone is eidetic and exportable then they are miniature. All aegean people are exportable. If someone is exportable and miniature then they are eidetic. Round, eidetic people are martian. If someone is exportable and not eidetic then they are martian. Adriena is bombproof.", "logic": "\nAegean(adriena)\nnot Bombproof(piotr)\nSeedless(gita)\nMartian(arie)\nforall x (Exportable(x) -> Miniature(x))\nforall x (Eidetic(x) and Exportable(x) -> Miniature(x))\nforall x (Aegean(x) -> Exportable(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) and Miniature(x) -> Eidetic(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) and Eidetic(x) -> Martian(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) and not Eidetic(x) -> Martian(x))\n\nBombproof(adriena)\n\nBombproof(adriena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1269"} {"premises": "Dania is chechen. Dania is carbonic. Dania is sidearm. Dania is bored. Dania is unequipped. Renee is carbonic. Lynn is bedaubed. Kaylil is carbonic. Kaylil is sidearm. Kaylil is bored. If Renee is chechen and Renee is midwestern then Renee is carbonic. If Kaylil is chechen then Kaylil is carbonic. Furry people are midwestern. All bored, midwestern people are chechen. If someone is carbonic then they are bored. If someone is unequipped then they are bored. If someone is midwestern and chechen then they are bored. All midwestern, sidearm people are carbonic. Lynn is bedaubed.", "logic": "\nChechen(dania)\nCarbonic(dania)\nSidearm(dania)\nBored(dania)\nUnequipped(dania)\nCarbonic(renee)\nBedaubed(lynn)\nCarbonic(kaylil)\nSidearm(kaylil)\nBored(kaylil)\nChechen(renee) and Midwestern(renee) -> Carbonic(renee)\nChechen(kaylil) -> Carbonic(kaylil)\nforall x (Carbonic(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nforall x (Bored(x) and Midwestern(x) -> Chechen(x))\nforall x (Carbonic(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Midwestern(x) and Chechen(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Midwestern(x) and Sidearm(x) -> Carbonic(x))\n\nBedaubed(lynn)\n\ntherefore Bedaubed(lynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Cassi is unreformed. Cassi is unenforced. Cassi is raptorial. Cassi is befuddled. Cassi is smuggled. Riki is unenforced. Barthel is mazed. Nestor is unenforced. Nestor is raptorial. Nestor is befuddled. If Riki is unreformed and Riki is caducean then Riki is unenforced. If Nestor is unreformed then Nestor is unenforced. Furry people are caducean. All befuddled, caducean people are unreformed. If someone is unenforced then they are befuddled. If someone is smuggled then they are befuddled. If someone is caducean and unreformed then they are befuddled. All caducean, raptorial people are unenforced. Nestor is not raptorial.", "logic": "\nUnreformed(cassi)\nUnenforced(cassi)\nRaptorial(cassi)\nBefuddled(cassi)\nSmuggled(cassi)\nUnenforced(riki)\nMazed(barthel)\nUnenforced(nestor)\nRaptorial(nestor)\nBefuddled(nestor)\nUnreformed(riki) and Caducean(riki) -> Unenforced(riki)\nUnreformed(nestor) -> Unenforced(nestor)\nforall x (Unenforced(x) -> Caducean(x))\nforall x (Befuddled(x) and Caducean(x) -> Unreformed(x))\nforall x (Unenforced(x) -> Befuddled(x))\nforall x (Smuggled(x) -> Befuddled(x))\nforall x (Caducean(x) and Unreformed(x) -> Befuddled(x))\nforall x (Caducean(x) and Raptorial(x) -> Unenforced(x))\n\nnot Raptorial(nestor)\n\ntherefore Raptorial(nestor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Merrielle is distaff. Merrielle is doomed. Merrielle is tensile. Merrielle is doctrinal. Merrielle is risky. Cyndi is doomed. Remy is bootless. Sebastian is doomed. Sebastian is tensile. Sebastian is doctrinal. If Cyndi is distaff and Cyndi is bardic then Cyndi is doomed. If Sebastian is distaff then Sebastian is doomed. Furry people are bardic. All doctrinal, bardic people are distaff. If someone is doomed then they are doctrinal. If someone is risky then they are doctrinal. If someone is bardic and distaff then they are doctrinal. All bardic, tensile people are doomed. Cyndi is bardic.", "logic": "\nDistaff(merrielle)\nDoomed(merrielle)\nTensile(merrielle)\nDoctrinal(merrielle)\nRisky(merrielle)\nDoomed(cyndi)\nBootless(remy)\nDoomed(sebastian)\nTensile(sebastian)\nDoctrinal(sebastian)\nDistaff(cyndi) and Bardic(cyndi) -> Doomed(cyndi)\nDistaff(sebastian) -> Doomed(sebastian)\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Bardic(x))\nforall x (Doctrinal(x) and Bardic(x) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Risky(x) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) and Distaff(x) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) and Tensile(x) -> Doomed(x))\n\nBardic(cyndi)\n\nDoomed(cyndi) and forall x (Doomed(x) -> Bardic(x)) -> therefore Bardic(cyndi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Kristin is clear. Kristin is isometric. Kristin is prostyle. Kristin is deuced. Kristin is polygynous. Danette is isometric. Rahal is corporate. Keith is isometric. Keith is prostyle. Keith is deuced. If Danette is clear and Danette is finite then Danette is isometric. If Keith is clear then Keith is isometric. Furry people are finite. All deuced, finite people are clear. If someone is isometric then they are deuced. If someone is polygynous then they are deuced. If someone is finite and clear then they are deuced. All finite, prostyle people are isometric. Danette is not finite.", "logic": "\nClear(kristin)\nIsometric(kristin)\nProstyle(kristin)\nDeuced(kristin)\nPolygynous(kristin)\nIsometric(danette)\nCorporate(rahal)\nIsometric(keith)\nProstyle(keith)\nDeuced(keith)\nClear(danette) and Finite(danette) -> Isometric(danette)\nClear(keith) -> Isometric(keith)\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Finite(x))\nforall x (Deuced(x) and Finite(x) -> Clear(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Finite(x) and Clear(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Finite(x) and Prostyle(x) -> Isometric(x))\n\nnot Finite(danette)\n\nIsometric(danette) and forall x (Isometric(x) -> Finite(x)) -> therefore Finite(danette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Danette is straggly. Danette is historic. Danette is oversize. Danette is speaking. Danette is motherly. Lovell is historic. Bill is rarefied. Verna is historic. Verna is oversize. Verna is speaking. If Lovell is straggly and Lovell is slavish then Lovell is historic. If Verna is straggly then Verna is historic. Furry people are slavish. All speaking, slavish people are straggly. If someone is historic then they are speaking. If someone is motherly then they are speaking. If someone is slavish and straggly then they are speaking. All slavish, oversize people are historic. Lovell is straggly.", "logic": "\nStraggly(danette)\nHistoric(danette)\nOversize(danette)\nSpeaking(danette)\nMotherly(danette)\nHistoric(lovell)\nRarefied(bill)\nHistoric(verna)\nOversize(verna)\nSpeaking(verna)\nStraggly(lovell) and Slavish(lovell) -> Historic(lovell)\nStraggly(verna) -> Historic(verna)\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Slavish(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) and Slavish(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Straggly(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Oversize(x) -> Historic(x))\n\nStraggly(lovell)\n\nHistoric(lovell) and forall x (Historic(x) -> Speaking(x)) -> therefore Speaking(lovell) Historic(lovell) and forall x (Historic(x) -> Slavish(x)) -> therefore Slavish(lovell) Speaking(lovell) and Slavish(lovell) and forall x (Speaking(x) and Slavish(x) -> Straggly(x)) -> therefore Straggly(lovell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Benedetta is cxxx. Benedetta is figural. Benedetta is mucinoid. Benedetta is swinish. Benedetta is half. Frederick is figural. Deb is ethnologic. Angelico is figural. Angelico is mucinoid. Angelico is swinish. If Frederick is cxxx and Frederick is puranic then Frederick is figural. If Angelico is cxxx then Angelico is figural. Furry people are puranic. All swinish, puranic people are cxxx. If someone is figural then they are swinish. If someone is half then they are swinish. If someone is puranic and cxxx then they are swinish. All puranic, mucinoid people are figural. Angelico is not cxxx.", "logic": "\nCxxx(benedetta)\nFigural(benedetta)\nMucinoid(benedetta)\nSwinish(benedetta)\nHalf(benedetta)\nFigural(frederick)\nEthnologic(deb)\nFigural(angelico)\nMucinoid(angelico)\nSwinish(angelico)\nCxxx(frederick) and Puranic(frederick) -> Figural(frederick)\nCxxx(angelico) -> Figural(angelico)\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Puranic(x))\nforall x (Swinish(x) and Puranic(x) -> Cxxx(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Half(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Puranic(x) and Cxxx(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Puranic(x) and Mucinoid(x) -> Figural(x))\n\nnot Cxxx(angelico)\n\nFigural(angelico) and forall x (Figural(x) -> Puranic(x)) -> therefore Puranic(angelico) Swinish(angelico) and Puranic(angelico) and forall x (Swinish(x) and Puranic(x) -> Cxxx(x)) -> therefore Cxxx(angelico)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Skell is expendable. Skell is dissenting. Skell is bareheaded. Skell is unequal. Skell is wise. Vance is dissenting. Wallas is scant. Marketa is dissenting. Marketa is bareheaded. Marketa is unequal. If Vance is expendable and Vance is leprous then Vance is dissenting. If Marketa is expendable then Marketa is dissenting. Furry people are leprous. All unequal, leprous people are expendable. If someone is dissenting then they are unequal. If someone is wise then they are unequal. If someone is leprous and expendable then they are unequal. All leprous, bareheaded people are dissenting. Wallas is not leprous.", "logic": "\nExpendable(skell)\nDissenting(skell)\nBareheaded(skell)\nUnequal(skell)\nWise(skell)\nDissenting(vance)\nScant(wallas)\nDissenting(marketa)\nBareheaded(marketa)\nUnequal(marketa)\nExpendable(vance) and Leprous(vance) -> Dissenting(vance)\nExpendable(marketa) -> Dissenting(marketa)\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Leprous(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Leprous(x) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Wise(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Leprous(x) and Expendable(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Leprous(x) and Bareheaded(x) -> Dissenting(x))\n\nnot Leprous(wallas)\n\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Leprous(x)) <- forall x (Leprous(x) and Bareheaded(x) -> Dissenting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Gerrard is pseudo. Gerrard is fireproof. Gerrard is elective. Gerrard is invariable. Gerrard is bolometric. Hiram is fireproof. Guenna is munificent. Angelico is fireproof. Angelico is elective. Angelico is invariable. If Hiram is pseudo and Hiram is regimental then Hiram is fireproof. If Angelico is pseudo then Angelico is fireproof. Furry people are regimental. All invariable, regimental people are pseudo. If someone is fireproof then they are invariable. If someone is bolometric then they are invariable. If someone is regimental and pseudo then they are invariable. All regimental, elective people are fireproof. Guenna is fireproof.", "logic": "\nPseudo(gerrard)\nFireproof(gerrard)\nElective(gerrard)\nInvariable(gerrard)\nBolometric(gerrard)\nFireproof(hiram)\nMunificent(guenna)\nFireproof(angelico)\nElective(angelico)\nInvariable(angelico)\nPseudo(hiram) and Regimental(hiram) -> Fireproof(hiram)\nPseudo(angelico) -> Fireproof(angelico)\nforall x (Fireproof(x) -> Regimental(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) and Regimental(x) -> Pseudo(x))\nforall x (Fireproof(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Bolometric(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) and Pseudo(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) and Elective(x) -> Fireproof(x))\n\nFireproof(guenna)\n\nforall x (Regimental(x) and Elective(x) -> Fireproof(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Michal is biotic. Michal is swedish. Michal is caffeinic. Michal is mannered. Michal is matured. Ibrahim is swedish. Karissa is untuneful. Lani is swedish. Lani is caffeinic. Lani is mannered. If Ibrahim is biotic and Ibrahim is zygotic then Ibrahim is swedish. If Lani is biotic then Lani is swedish. Furry people are zygotic. All mannered, zygotic people are biotic. If someone is swedish then they are mannered. If someone is matured then they are mannered. If someone is zygotic and biotic then they are mannered. All zygotic, caffeinic people are swedish. Karissa is not mannered.", "logic": "\nBiotic(michal)\nSwedish(michal)\nCaffeinic(michal)\nMannered(michal)\nMatured(michal)\nSwedish(ibrahim)\nUntuneful(karissa)\nSwedish(lani)\nCaffeinic(lani)\nMannered(lani)\nBiotic(ibrahim) and Zygotic(ibrahim) -> Swedish(ibrahim)\nBiotic(lani) -> Swedish(lani)\nforall x (Swedish(x) -> Zygotic(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) and Zygotic(x) -> Biotic(x))\nforall x (Swedish(x) -> Mannered(x))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Mannered(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and Biotic(x) -> Mannered(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and Caffeinic(x) -> Swedish(x))\n\nnot Mannered(karissa)\n\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and Biotic(x) -> Mannered(x)) <- forall x (Swedish(x) -> Zygotic(x)) <- forall x (Zygotic(x) and Caffeinic(x) -> Swedish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Alica is alveolate. Alica is proustian. Alica is mediaeval. Alica is sleeping. Alica is opalescent. Carmelia is proustian. Bernadine is zoftig. Theda is proustian. Theda is mediaeval. Theda is sleeping. If Carmelia is alveolate and Carmelia is irritated then Carmelia is proustian. If Theda is alveolate then Theda is proustian. Furry people are irritated. All sleeping, irritated people are alveolate. If someone is proustian then they are sleeping. If someone is opalescent then they are sleeping. If someone is irritated and alveolate then they are sleeping. All irritated, mediaeval people are proustian. Carmelia is opalescent.", "logic": "\nAlveolate(alica)\nProustian(alica)\nMediaeval(alica)\nSleeping(alica)\nOpalescent(alica)\nProustian(carmelia)\nZoftig(bernadine)\nProustian(theda)\nMediaeval(theda)\nSleeping(theda)\nAlveolate(carmelia) and Irritated(carmelia) -> Proustian(carmelia)\nAlveolate(theda) -> Proustian(theda)\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Irritated(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) and Irritated(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Sleeping(x))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) -> Sleeping(x))\nforall x (Irritated(x) and Alveolate(x) -> Sleeping(x))\nforall x (Irritated(x) and Mediaeval(x) -> Proustian(x))\n\nOpalescent(carmelia)\n\nOpalescent(carmelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Aub is best. Aub is alloyed. Aub is draggled. Aub is covariant. Aub is glorified. Lilian is alloyed. Jeanine is papillose. Corenda is alloyed. Corenda is draggled. Corenda is covariant. If Lilian is best and Lilian is lofty then Lilian is alloyed. If Corenda is best then Corenda is alloyed. Furry people are lofty. All covariant, lofty people are best. If someone is alloyed then they are covariant. If someone is glorified then they are covariant. If someone is lofty and best then they are covariant. All lofty, draggled people are alloyed. Jeanine is not draggled.", "logic": "\nBest(aub)\nAlloyed(aub)\nDraggled(aub)\nCovariant(aub)\nGlorified(aub)\nAlloyed(lilian)\nPapillose(jeanine)\nAlloyed(corenda)\nDraggled(corenda)\nCovariant(corenda)\nBest(lilian) and Lofty(lilian) -> Alloyed(lilian)\nBest(corenda) -> Alloyed(corenda)\nforall x (Alloyed(x) -> Lofty(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Lofty(x) -> Best(x))\nforall x (Alloyed(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) and Best(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) and Draggled(x) -> Alloyed(x))\n\nnot Draggled(jeanine)\n\nnot Draggled(jeanine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "Godart is productive. Godart is bacchic. Godart is antitypic. Godart is mealy. Godart is sciatic. Brinkley is bacchic. Shamus is loveless. Burgess is bacchic. Burgess is antitypic. Burgess is mealy. If Brinkley is productive and Brinkley is quarterly then Brinkley is bacchic. If Burgess is productive then Burgess is bacchic. Furry people are quarterly. All mealy, quarterly people are productive. If someone is bacchic then they are mealy. If someone is sciatic then they are mealy. If someone is quarterly and productive then they are mealy. All quarterly, antitypic people are bacchic. Shamus is sciatic.", "logic": "\nProductive(godart)\nBacchic(godart)\nAntitypic(godart)\nMealy(godart)\nSciatic(godart)\nBacchic(brinkley)\nLoveless(shamus)\nBacchic(burgess)\nAntitypic(burgess)\nMealy(burgess)\nProductive(brinkley) and Quarterly(brinkley) -> Bacchic(brinkley)\nProductive(burgess) -> Bacchic(burgess)\nforall x (Bacchic(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) and Quarterly(x) -> Productive(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Sciatic(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and Productive(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Bacchic(x))\n\nSciatic(shamus)\n\nSciatic(shamus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1765"} {"premises": "The nevile copyread the arthur. The nevile is salmon. The arthur copyread the sully. The sully copyread the nevile. The sully copyread the arthur. The cobb copyread the arthur. The cobb repose the arthur. The cobb repose the sully. The cobb is bellbottom. The cobb poll the nevile. If something poll the arthur then it copyread the arthur. If something is bellbottom then it poll the sully. If something copyread the arthur then the arthur poll the nevile. If something repose the sully and the sully is salmon then it is treacly. If something repose the cobb then it poll the cobb. If something is bellbottom then it repose the cobb. If something repose the nevile then the nevile repose the cobb. If something copyread the nevile and the nevile is ictal then the nevile poll the cobb. The cobb poll the nevile.", "logic": "\nCopyread(nevile, arthur)\nSalmon(nevile)\nCopyread(arthur, sully)\nCopyread(sully, nevile)\nCopyread(sully, arthur)\nCopyread(cobb, arthur)\nRepose(cobb, arthur)\nRepose(cobb, sully)\nBellbottom(cobb)\nPoll(cobb, nevile)\nforall x (Poll(x, arthur) -> Copyread(x, arthur))\nforall x (Bellbottom(x) -> Poll(x, sully))\nforall x (Copyread(x, arthur) -> Poll(arthur, nevile))\nforall x (Repose(x, sully) and Salmon(sully) -> Treacly(x))\nforall x (Repose(x, cobb) -> Poll(x, cobb))\nforall x (Bellbottom(x) -> Repose(x, cobb))\nforall x (Repose(x, nevile) -> Repose(nevile, cobb))\nforall x (Copyread(x, nevile) and Ictal(nevile) -> Poll(nevile, cobb))\n\nPoll(cobb, nevile)\n\ntherefore Poll(cobb, nevile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The barbabas remit the mikako. The barbabas is suited. The mikako remit the cassie. The cassie remit the barbabas. The cassie remit the mikako. The carter remit the mikako. The carter airfreight the mikako. The carter airfreight the cassie. The carter is amended. The carter buffer the barbabas. If something buffer the mikako then it remit the mikako. If something is amended then it buffer the cassie. If something remit the mikako then the mikako buffer the barbabas. If something airfreight the cassie and the cassie is suited then it is birch. If something airfreight the carter then it buffer the carter. If something is amended then it airfreight the carter. If something airfreight the barbabas then the barbabas airfreight the carter. If something remit the barbabas and the barbabas is beauteous then the barbabas buffer the carter. The cassie does not chase the mikako.", "logic": "\nRemit(barbabas, mikako)\nSuited(barbabas)\nRemit(mikako, cassie)\nRemit(cassie, barbabas)\nRemit(cassie, mikako)\nRemit(carter, mikako)\nAirfreight(carter, mikako)\nAirfreight(carter, cassie)\nAmended(carter)\nBuffer(carter, barbabas)\nforall x (Buffer(x, mikako) -> Remit(x, mikako))\nforall x (Amended(x) -> Buffer(x, cassie))\nforall x (Remit(x, mikako) -> Buffer(mikako, barbabas))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, cassie) and Suited(cassie) -> Birch(x))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, carter) -> Buffer(x, carter))\nforall x (Amended(x) -> Airfreight(x, carter))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, barbabas) -> Airfreight(barbabas, carter))\nforall x (Remit(x, barbabas) and Beauteous(barbabas) -> Buffer(barbabas, carter))\n\nnot Remit(cassie, mikako)\n\ntherefore Remit(cassie, mikako)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The barny petrify the cass. The barny is monarchic. The cass petrify the aeriell. The aeriell petrify the barny. The aeriell petrify the cass. The reube petrify the cass. The reube mongrelise the cass. The reube mongrelise the aeriell. The reube is protective. The reube empale the barny. If something empale the cass then it petrify the cass. If something is protective then it empale the aeriell. If something petrify the cass then the cass empale the barny. If something mongrelise the aeriell and the aeriell is monarchic then it is crooked. If something mongrelise the reube then it empale the reube. If something is protective then it mongrelise the reube. If something mongrelise the barny then the barny mongrelise the reube. If something petrify the barny and the barny is manful then the barny empale the reube. The cass empale the barny.", "logic": "\nPetrify(barny, cass)\nMonarchic(barny)\nPetrify(cass, aeriell)\nPetrify(aeriell, barny)\nPetrify(aeriell, cass)\nPetrify(reube, cass)\nMongrelise(reube, cass)\nMongrelise(reube, aeriell)\nProtective(reube)\nEmpale(reube, barny)\nforall x (Empale(x, cass) -> Petrify(x, cass))\nforall x (Protective(x) -> Empale(x, aeriell))\nforall x (Petrify(x, cass) -> Empale(cass, barny))\nforall x (Mongrelise(x, aeriell) and Monarchic(aeriell) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Mongrelise(x, reube) -> Empale(x, reube))\nforall x (Protective(x) -> Mongrelise(x, reube))\nforall x (Mongrelise(x, barny) -> Mongrelise(barny, reube))\nforall x (Petrify(x, barny) and Manful(barny) -> Empale(barny, reube))\n\nEmpale(cass, barny)\n\nPetrify(barny, cass) and forall x (Petrify(x, cass) -> Empale(cass, barny)) -> therefore Empale(cass, barny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The kalina displease the paten. The kalina is unlobed. The paten displease the leoine. The leoine displease the kalina. The leoine displease the paten. The carrol displease the paten. The carrol surtax the paten. The carrol surtax the leoine. The carrol is hypodermal. The carrol yell the kalina. If something yell the paten then it displease the paten. If something is hypodermal then it yell the leoine. If something displease the paten then the paten yell the kalina. If something surtax the leoine and the leoine is unlobed then it is dizygous. If something surtax the carrol then it yell the carrol. If something is hypodermal then it surtax the carrol. If something surtax the kalina then the kalina surtax the carrol. If something displease the kalina and the kalina is felicitous then the kalina yell the carrol. The carrol does not visit the leoine.", "logic": "\nDisplease(kalina, paten)\nUnlobed(kalina)\nDisplease(paten, leoine)\nDisplease(leoine, kalina)\nDisplease(leoine, paten)\nDisplease(carrol, paten)\nSurtax(carrol, paten)\nSurtax(carrol, leoine)\nHypodermal(carrol)\nYell(carrol, kalina)\nforall x (Yell(x, paten) -> Displease(x, paten))\nforall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Yell(x, leoine))\nforall x (Displease(x, paten) -> Yell(paten, kalina))\nforall x (Surtax(x, leoine) and Unlobed(leoine) -> Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Surtax(x, carrol) -> Yell(x, carrol))\nforall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Surtax(x, carrol))\nforall x (Surtax(x, kalina) -> Surtax(kalina, carrol))\nforall x (Displease(x, kalina) and Felicitous(kalina) -> Yell(kalina, carrol))\n\nnot Yell(carrol, leoine)\n\nHypodermal(carrol) and forall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Yell(x, leoine)) -> therefore Yell(carrol, leoine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The marna kayo the debora. The marna is bellicose. The debora kayo the mindy. The mindy kayo the marna. The mindy kayo the debora. The reece kayo the debora. The reece radio the debora. The reece radio the mindy. The reece is gawky. The reece bullshit the marna. If something bullshit the debora then it kayo the debora. If something is gawky then it bullshit the mindy. If something kayo the debora then the debora bullshit the marna. If something radio the mindy and the mindy is bellicose then it is packaged. If something radio the reece then it bullshit the reece. If something is gawky then it radio the reece. If something radio the marna then the marna radio the reece. If something kayo the marna and the marna is fledgeless then the marna bullshit the reece. The reece bullshit the reece.", "logic": "\nKayo(marna, debora)\nBellicose(marna)\nKayo(debora, mindy)\nKayo(mindy, marna)\nKayo(mindy, debora)\nKayo(reece, debora)\nRadio(reece, debora)\nRadio(reece, mindy)\nGawky(reece)\nBullshit(reece, marna)\nforall x (Bullshit(x, debora) -> Kayo(x, debora))\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Bullshit(x, mindy))\nforall x (Kayo(x, debora) -> Bullshit(debora, marna))\nforall x (Radio(x, mindy) and Bellicose(mindy) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Radio(x, reece) -> Bullshit(x, reece))\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Radio(x, reece))\nforall x (Radio(x, marna) -> Radio(marna, reece))\nforall x (Kayo(x, marna) and Fledgeless(marna) -> Bullshit(marna, reece))\n\nBullshit(reece, reece)\n\nGawky(reece) and forall x (Gawky(x) -> Radio(x, reece)) -> therefore Radio(reece, reece) Radio(reece, reece) and forall x (Radio(x, reece) -> Bullshit(x, reece)) -> therefore Bullshit(reece, reece)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The amaleta troop the jay. The amaleta is angular. The jay troop the perl. The perl troop the amaleta. The perl troop the jay. The berchtold troop the jay. The berchtold accession the jay. The berchtold accession the perl. The berchtold is guiltless. The berchtold doze the amaleta. If something doze the jay then it troop the jay. If something is guiltless then it doze the perl. If something troop the jay then the jay doze the amaleta. If something accession the perl and the perl is angular then it is burdensome. If something accession the berchtold then it doze the berchtold. If something is guiltless then it accession the berchtold. If something accession the amaleta then the amaleta accession the berchtold. If something troop the amaleta and the amaleta is artistic then the amaleta doze the berchtold. The berchtold does not visit the berchtold.", "logic": "\nTroop(amaleta, jay)\nAngular(amaleta)\nTroop(jay, perl)\nTroop(perl, amaleta)\nTroop(perl, jay)\nTroop(berchtold, jay)\nAccession(berchtold, jay)\nAccession(berchtold, perl)\nGuiltless(berchtold)\nDoze(berchtold, amaleta)\nforall x (Doze(x, jay) -> Troop(x, jay))\nforall x (Guiltless(x) -> Doze(x, perl))\nforall x (Troop(x, jay) -> Doze(jay, amaleta))\nforall x (Accession(x, perl) and Angular(perl) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Accession(x, berchtold) -> Doze(x, berchtold))\nforall x (Guiltless(x) -> Accession(x, berchtold))\nforall x (Accession(x, amaleta) -> Accession(amaleta, berchtold))\nforall x (Troop(x, amaleta) and Artistic(amaleta) -> Doze(amaleta, berchtold))\n\nnot Doze(berchtold, berchtold)\n\nGuiltless(berchtold) and forall x (Guiltless(x) -> Accession(x, berchtold)) -> therefore Accession(berchtold, berchtold) Accession(berchtold, berchtold) and forall x (Accession(x, berchtold) -> Doze(x, berchtold)) -> therefore Doze(berchtold, berchtold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The walther glide the spenser. The walther is chichi. The spenser glide the tobit. The tobit glide the walther. The tobit glide the spenser. The leigha glide the spenser. The leigha converge the spenser. The leigha converge the tobit. The leigha is mere. The leigha globalize the walther. If something globalize the spenser then it glide the spenser. If something is mere then it globalize the tobit. If something glide the spenser then the spenser globalize the walther. If something converge the tobit and the tobit is chichi then it is glooming. If something converge the leigha then it globalize the leigha. If something is mere then it converge the leigha. If something converge the walther then the walther converge the leigha. If something glide the walther and the walther is eastbound then the walther globalize the leigha. The tobit does not eat the leigha.", "logic": "\nGlide(walther, spenser)\nChichi(walther)\nGlide(spenser, tobit)\nGlide(tobit, walther)\nGlide(tobit, spenser)\nGlide(leigha, spenser)\nConverge(leigha, spenser)\nConverge(leigha, tobit)\nMere(leigha)\nGlobalize(leigha, walther)\nforall x (Globalize(x, spenser) -> Glide(x, spenser))\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Globalize(x, tobit))\nforall x (Glide(x, spenser) -> Globalize(spenser, walther))\nforall x (Converge(x, tobit) and Chichi(tobit) -> Glooming(x))\nforall x (Converge(x, leigha) -> Globalize(x, leigha))\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Converge(x, leigha))\nforall x (Converge(x, walther) -> Converge(walther, leigha))\nforall x (Glide(x, walther) and Eastbound(walther) -> Globalize(walther, leigha))\n\nnot Converge(tobit, leigha)\n\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Converge(x, leigha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The yancey ratify the jed. The yancey is scrivened. The jed ratify the wilow. The wilow ratify the yancey. The wilow ratify the jed. The clint ratify the jed. The clint psalm the jed. The clint psalm the wilow. The clint is wordless. The clint conn the yancey. If something conn the jed then it ratify the jed. If something is wordless then it conn the wilow. If something ratify the jed then the jed conn the yancey. If something psalm the wilow and the wilow is scrivened then it is scaley. If something psalm the clint then it conn the clint. If something is wordless then it psalm the clint. If something psalm the yancey then the yancey psalm the clint. If something ratify the yancey and the yancey is flyblown then the yancey conn the clint. The jed conn the clint.", "logic": "\nRatify(yancey, jed)\nScrivened(yancey)\nRatify(jed, wilow)\nRatify(wilow, yancey)\nRatify(wilow, jed)\nRatify(clint, jed)\nPsalm(clint, jed)\nPsalm(clint, wilow)\nWordless(clint)\nConn(clint, yancey)\nforall x (Conn(x, jed) -> Ratify(x, jed))\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Conn(x, wilow))\nforall x (Ratify(x, jed) -> Conn(jed, yancey))\nforall x (Psalm(x, wilow) and Scrivened(wilow) -> Scaley(x))\nforall x (Psalm(x, clint) -> Conn(x, clint))\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Psalm(x, clint))\nforall x (Psalm(x, yancey) -> Psalm(yancey, clint))\nforall x (Ratify(x, yancey) and Flyblown(yancey) -> Conn(yancey, clint))\n\nConn(jed, clint)\n\nforall x (Psalm(x, clint) -> Conn(x, clint)) <- forall x (Wordless(x) -> Psalm(x, clint)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The lorain smatter the nell. The lorain is cloaked. The nell smatter the giavani. The giavani smatter the lorain. The giavani smatter the nell. The coraline smatter the nell. The coraline postdate the nell. The coraline postdate the giavani. The coraline is atoxic. The coraline entreat the lorain. If something entreat the nell then it smatter the nell. If something is atoxic then it entreat the giavani. If something smatter the nell then the nell entreat the lorain. If something postdate the giavani and the giavani is cloaked then it is adiabatic. If something postdate the coraline then it entreat the coraline. If something is atoxic then it postdate the coraline. If something postdate the lorain then the lorain postdate the coraline. If something smatter the lorain and the lorain is gordian then the lorain entreat the coraline. The nell does not eat the coraline.", "logic": "\nSmatter(lorain, nell)\nCloaked(lorain)\nSmatter(nell, giavani)\nSmatter(giavani, lorain)\nSmatter(giavani, nell)\nSmatter(coraline, nell)\nPostdate(coraline, nell)\nPostdate(coraline, giavani)\nAtoxic(coraline)\nEntreat(coraline, lorain)\nforall x (Entreat(x, nell) -> Smatter(x, nell))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Entreat(x, giavani))\nforall x (Smatter(x, nell) -> Entreat(nell, lorain))\nforall x (Postdate(x, giavani) and Cloaked(giavani) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Postdate(x, coraline) -> Entreat(x, coraline))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Postdate(x, coraline))\nforall x (Postdate(x, lorain) -> Postdate(lorain, coraline))\nforall x (Smatter(x, lorain) and Gordian(lorain) -> Entreat(lorain, coraline))\n\nnot Postdate(nell, coraline)\n\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Postdate(x, coraline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The yolanda condescend the ailee. The yolanda is seafaring. The ailee condescend the beaufort. The beaufort condescend the yolanda. The beaufort condescend the ailee. The geralda condescend the ailee. The geralda capsize the ailee. The geralda capsize the beaufort. The geralda is pandemic. The geralda vanquish the yolanda. If something vanquish the ailee then it condescend the ailee. If something is pandemic then it vanquish the beaufort. If something condescend the ailee then the ailee vanquish the yolanda. If something capsize the beaufort and the beaufort is seafaring then it is mercenary. If something capsize the geralda then it vanquish the geralda. If something is pandemic then it capsize the geralda. If something capsize the yolanda then the yolanda capsize the geralda. If something condescend the yolanda and the yolanda is sorbed then the yolanda vanquish the geralda. The beaufort is seafaring.", "logic": "\nCondescend(yolanda, ailee)\nSeafaring(yolanda)\nCondescend(ailee, beaufort)\nCondescend(beaufort, yolanda)\nCondescend(beaufort, ailee)\nCondescend(geralda, ailee)\nCapsize(geralda, ailee)\nCapsize(geralda, beaufort)\nPandemic(geralda)\nVanquish(geralda, yolanda)\nforall x (Vanquish(x, ailee) -> Condescend(x, ailee))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) -> Vanquish(x, beaufort))\nforall x (Condescend(x, ailee) -> Vanquish(ailee, yolanda))\nforall x (Capsize(x, beaufort) and Seafaring(beaufort) -> Mercenary(x))\nforall x (Capsize(x, geralda) -> Vanquish(x, geralda))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) -> Capsize(x, geralda))\nforall x (Capsize(x, yolanda) -> Capsize(yolanda, geralda))\nforall x (Condescend(x, yolanda) and Sorbed(yolanda) -> Vanquish(yolanda, geralda))\n\nSeafaring(beaufort)\n\nSeafaring(beaufort) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The antonius swosh the roanna. The antonius is cashed. The roanna swosh the caitrin. The caitrin swosh the antonius. The caitrin swosh the roanna. The betsy swosh the roanna. The betsy sober the roanna. The betsy sober the caitrin. The betsy is foppish. The betsy flambe the antonius. If something flambe the roanna then it swosh the roanna. If something is foppish then it flambe the caitrin. If something swosh the roanna then the roanna flambe the antonius. If something sober the caitrin and the caitrin is cashed then it is saving. If something sober the betsy then it flambe the betsy. If something is foppish then it sober the betsy. If something sober the antonius then the antonius sober the betsy. If something swosh the antonius and the antonius is unbanded then the antonius flambe the betsy. The roanna does not chase the betsy.", "logic": "\nSwosh(antonius, roanna)\nCashed(antonius)\nSwosh(roanna, caitrin)\nSwosh(caitrin, antonius)\nSwosh(caitrin, roanna)\nSwosh(betsy, roanna)\nSober(betsy, roanna)\nSober(betsy, caitrin)\nFoppish(betsy)\nFlambe(betsy, antonius)\nforall x (Flambe(x, roanna) -> Swosh(x, roanna))\nforall x (Foppish(x) -> Flambe(x, caitrin))\nforall x (Swosh(x, roanna) -> Flambe(roanna, antonius))\nforall x (Sober(x, caitrin) and Cashed(caitrin) -> Saving(x))\nforall x (Sober(x, betsy) -> Flambe(x, betsy))\nforall x (Foppish(x) -> Sober(x, betsy))\nforall x (Sober(x, antonius) -> Sober(antonius, betsy))\nforall x (Swosh(x, antonius) and Unbanded(antonius) -> Flambe(antonius, betsy))\n\nnot Swosh(roanna, betsy)\n\nnot Swosh(roanna, betsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The odetta desire the lazarus. The odetta is unthawed. The lazarus desire the terri. The terri desire the odetta. The terri desire the lazarus. The ilona desire the lazarus. The ilona fast the lazarus. The ilona fast the terri. The ilona is organismal. The ilona unbox the odetta. If something unbox the lazarus then it desire the lazarus. If something is organismal then it unbox the terri. If something desire the lazarus then the lazarus unbox the odetta. If something fast the terri and the terri is unthawed then it is vincible. If something fast the ilona then it unbox the ilona. If something is organismal then it fast the ilona. If something fast the odetta then the odetta fast the ilona. If something desire the odetta and the odetta is foolproof then the odetta unbox the ilona. The odetta fast the odetta.", "logic": "\nDesire(odetta, lazarus)\nUnthawed(odetta)\nDesire(lazarus, terri)\nDesire(terri, odetta)\nDesire(terri, lazarus)\nDesire(ilona, lazarus)\nFast(ilona, lazarus)\nFast(ilona, terri)\nOrganismal(ilona)\nUnbox(ilona, odetta)\nforall x (Unbox(x, lazarus) -> Desire(x, lazarus))\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> Unbox(x, terri))\nforall x (Desire(x, lazarus) -> Unbox(lazarus, odetta))\nforall x (Fast(x, terri) and Unthawed(terri) -> Vincible(x))\nforall x (Fast(x, ilona) -> Unbox(x, ilona))\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> Fast(x, ilona))\nforall x (Fast(x, odetta) -> Fast(odetta, ilona))\nforall x (Desire(x, odetta) and Foolproof(odetta) -> Unbox(odetta, ilona))\n\nFast(odetta, odetta)\n\nFast(odetta, odetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-571"} {"premises": "The keelia conjoin the sena. The keelia grime the jennie. The jennie conjoin the clara. The jennie does not chase the sena. The jennie is not dappled. The clara brand the jennie. The clara brand the sena. The sena conjoin the jennie. The sena conjoin the clara. The sena brand the clara. If something brand the sena then the sena is pulmonic. If something conjoin the jennie and it is pulmonic then the jennie grime the sena. The jennie conjoin the clara.", "logic": "\nConjoin(keelia, sena)\nGrime(keelia, jennie)\nConjoin(jennie, clara)\nnot Conjoin(jennie, sena)\nnot Dappled(jennie)\nBrand(clara, jennie)\nBrand(clara, sena)\nConjoin(sena, jennie)\nConjoin(sena, clara)\nBrand(sena, clara)\nforall x (Brand(x, sena) -> Pulmonic(sena))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, jennie) and Pulmonic(x) -> Grime(jennie, sena))\n\nConjoin(jennie, clara)\n\ntherefore Conjoin(jennie, clara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The cora abstain the alyson. The cora evangelise the annissa. The annissa abstain the marga. The annissa does not chase the alyson. The annissa is not pricey. The marga globalize the annissa. The marga globalize the alyson. The alyson abstain the annissa. The alyson abstain the marga. The alyson globalize the marga. If something globalize the alyson then the alyson is lipless. If something abstain the annissa and it is lipless then the annissa evangelise the alyson. The alyson does not chase the annissa.", "logic": "\nAbstain(cora, alyson)\nEvangelise(cora, annissa)\nAbstain(annissa, marga)\nnot Abstain(annissa, alyson)\nnot Pricey(annissa)\nGlobalize(marga, annissa)\nGlobalize(marga, alyson)\nAbstain(alyson, annissa)\nAbstain(alyson, marga)\nGlobalize(alyson, marga)\nforall x (Globalize(x, alyson) -> Lipless(alyson))\nforall x (Abstain(x, annissa) and Lipless(x) -> Evangelise(annissa, alyson))\n\nnot Abstain(alyson, annissa)\n\ntherefore Abstain(alyson, annissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The heather invoice the eimile. The heather reopen the ebonee. The ebonee invoice the karry. The ebonee does not chase the eimile. The ebonee is not slick. The karry redden the ebonee. The karry redden the eimile. The eimile invoice the ebonee. The eimile invoice the karry. The eimile redden the karry. If something redden the eimile then the eimile is tame. If something invoice the ebonee and it is tame then the ebonee reopen the eimile. The eimile is tame.", "logic": "\nInvoice(heather, eimile)\nReopen(heather, ebonee)\nInvoice(ebonee, karry)\nnot Invoice(ebonee, eimile)\nnot Slick(ebonee)\nRedden(karry, ebonee)\nRedden(karry, eimile)\nInvoice(eimile, ebonee)\nInvoice(eimile, karry)\nRedden(eimile, karry)\nforall x (Redden(x, eimile) -> Tame(eimile))\nforall x (Invoice(x, ebonee) and Tame(x) -> Reopen(ebonee, eimile))\n\nTame(eimile)\n\nRedden(karry, eimile) and forall x (Redden(x, eimile) -> Tame(eimile)) -> therefore Tame(eimile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The harlan scribble the benson. The harlan deprive the stew. The stew scribble the serge. The stew does not chase the benson. The stew is not walking. The serge skreigh the stew. The serge skreigh the benson. The benson scribble the stew. The benson scribble the serge. The benson skreigh the serge. If something skreigh the benson then the benson is silken. If something scribble the stew and it is silken then the stew deprive the benson. The benson is not silken.", "logic": "\nScribble(harlan, benson)\nDeprive(harlan, stew)\nScribble(stew, serge)\nnot Scribble(stew, benson)\nnot Walking(stew)\nSkreigh(serge, stew)\nSkreigh(serge, benson)\nScribble(benson, stew)\nScribble(benson, serge)\nSkreigh(benson, serge)\nforall x (Skreigh(x, benson) -> Silken(benson))\nforall x (Scribble(x, stew) and Silken(x) -> Deprive(stew, benson))\n\nnot Silken(benson)\n\nSkreigh(serge, benson) and forall x (Skreigh(x, benson) -> Silken(benson)) -> therefore Silken(benson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The adolphe represent the avi. The adolphe theorise the ave. The ave represent the salman. The ave does not chase the avi. The ave is not cinnabar. The salman literalise the ave. The salman literalise the avi. The avi represent the ave. The avi represent the salman. The avi literalise the salman. If something literalise the avi then the avi is charming. If something represent the ave and it is charming then the ave theorise the avi. The ave theorise the avi.", "logic": "\nRepresent(adolphe, avi)\nTheorise(adolphe, ave)\nRepresent(ave, salman)\nnot Represent(ave, avi)\nnot Cinnabar(ave)\nLiteralise(salman, ave)\nLiteralise(salman, avi)\nRepresent(avi, ave)\nRepresent(avi, salman)\nLiteralise(avi, salman)\nforall x (Literalise(x, avi) -> Charming(avi))\nforall x (Represent(x, ave) and Charming(x) -> Theorise(ave, avi))\n\nTheorise(ave, avi)\n\nLiteralise(salman, avi) and forall x (Literalise(x, avi) -> Charming(avi)) -> therefore Charming(avi) Represent(avi, ave) and Charming(avi) and forall x (Represent(x, ave) and Charming(x) -> Theorise(ave, avi)) -> therefore Theorise(ave, avi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The amelina worst the alaine. The amelina miaow the nyssa. The nyssa worst the jewel. The nyssa does not chase the alaine. The nyssa is not pretend. The jewel avalanche the nyssa. The jewel avalanche the alaine. The alaine worst the nyssa. The alaine worst the jewel. The alaine avalanche the jewel. If something avalanche the alaine then the alaine is snafu. If something worst the nyssa and it is snafu then the nyssa miaow the alaine. The nyssa does not like the alaine.", "logic": "\nWorst(amelina, alaine)\nMiaow(amelina, nyssa)\nWorst(nyssa, jewel)\nnot Worst(nyssa, alaine)\nnot Pretend(nyssa)\nAvalanche(jewel, nyssa)\nAvalanche(jewel, alaine)\nWorst(alaine, nyssa)\nWorst(alaine, jewel)\nAvalanche(alaine, jewel)\nforall x (Avalanche(x, alaine) -> Snafu(alaine))\nforall x (Worst(x, nyssa) and Snafu(x) -> Miaow(nyssa, alaine))\n\nnot Miaow(nyssa, alaine)\n\nAvalanche(jewel, alaine) and forall x (Avalanche(x, alaine) -> Snafu(alaine)) -> therefore Snafu(alaine) Worst(alaine, nyssa) and Snafu(alaine) and forall x (Worst(x, nyssa) and Snafu(x) -> Miaow(nyssa, alaine)) -> therefore Miaow(nyssa, alaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The kip lifehack the logan. The kip pulsate the korie. The korie lifehack the chase. The korie does not chase the logan. The korie is not acetose. The chase reproach the korie. The chase reproach the logan. The logan lifehack the korie. The logan lifehack the chase. The logan reproach the chase. If something reproach the logan then the logan is throwback. If something lifehack the korie and it is throwback then the korie pulsate the logan. The kip does not chase the kip.", "logic": "\nLifehack(kip, logan)\nPulsate(kip, korie)\nLifehack(korie, chase)\nnot Lifehack(korie, logan)\nnot Acetose(korie)\nReproach(chase, korie)\nReproach(chase, logan)\nLifehack(logan, korie)\nLifehack(logan, chase)\nReproach(logan, chase)\nforall x (Reproach(x, logan) -> Throwback(logan))\nforall x (Lifehack(x, korie) and Throwback(x) -> Pulsate(korie, logan))\n\nnot Lifehack(kip, kip)\n\nnot Lifehack(kip, kip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The france empty the murielle. The france envenom the marcio. The marcio empty the quentin. The marcio does not chase the murielle. The marcio is not impendent. The quentin snatch the marcio. The quentin snatch the murielle. The murielle empty the marcio. The murielle empty the quentin. The murielle snatch the quentin. If something snatch the murielle then the murielle is famed. If something empty the marcio and it is famed then the marcio envenom the murielle. The quentin envenom the marcio.", "logic": "\nEmpty(france, murielle)\nEnvenom(france, marcio)\nEmpty(marcio, quentin)\nnot Empty(marcio, murielle)\nnot Impendent(marcio)\nSnatch(quentin, marcio)\nSnatch(quentin, murielle)\nEmpty(murielle, marcio)\nEmpty(murielle, quentin)\nSnatch(murielle, quentin)\nforall x (Snatch(x, murielle) -> Famed(murielle))\nforall x (Empty(x, marcio) and Famed(x) -> Envenom(marcio, murielle))\n\nEnvenom(quentin, marcio)\n\nEnvenom(quentin, marcio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The skye recap the shimon. The skye omit the frances. The frances recap the sarine. The frances does not chase the shimon. The frances is not oozy. The sarine bronze the frances. The sarine bronze the shimon. The shimon recap the frances. The shimon recap the sarine. The shimon bronze the sarine. If something bronze the shimon then the shimon is acceptive. If something recap the frances and it is acceptive then the frances omit the shimon. The skye is not green.", "logic": "\nRecap(skye, shimon)\nOmit(skye, frances)\nRecap(frances, sarine)\nnot Recap(frances, shimon)\nnot Oozy(frances)\nBronze(sarine, frances)\nBronze(sarine, shimon)\nRecap(shimon, frances)\nRecap(shimon, sarine)\nBronze(shimon, sarine)\nforall x (Bronze(x, shimon) -> Acceptive(shimon))\nforall x (Recap(x, frances) and Acceptive(x) -> Omit(frances, shimon))\n\nnot Green(skye)\n\nnot Green(skye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The ansel disrobe the kissee. The ansel inscribe the merci. The merci disrobe the viviene. The merci does not chase the kissee. The merci is not overgrown. The viviene intubate the merci. The viviene intubate the kissee. The kissee disrobe the merci. The kissee disrobe the viviene. The kissee intubate the viviene. If something intubate the kissee then the kissee is concealed. If something disrobe the merci and it is concealed then the merci inscribe the kissee. The ansel is cold.", "logic": "\nDisrobe(ansel, kissee)\nInscribe(ansel, merci)\nDisrobe(merci, viviene)\nnot Disrobe(merci, kissee)\nnot Overgrown(merci)\nIntubate(viviene, merci)\nIntubate(viviene, kissee)\nDisrobe(kissee, merci)\nDisrobe(kissee, viviene)\nIntubate(kissee, viviene)\nforall x (Intubate(x, kissee) -> Concealed(kissee))\nforall x (Disrobe(x, merci) and Concealed(x) -> Inscribe(merci, kissee))\n\nCold(ansel)\n\nCold(ansel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The leighton bravo the aeriel. The leighton slake the ritch. The ritch bravo the karoly. The ritch does not chase the aeriel. The ritch is not blatant. The karoly iridesce the ritch. The karoly iridesce the aeriel. The aeriel bravo the ritch. The aeriel bravo the karoly. The aeriel iridesce the karoly. If something iridesce the aeriel then the aeriel is syrupy. If something bravo the ritch and it is syrupy then the ritch slake the aeriel. The aeriel is not cold.", "logic": "\nBravo(leighton, aeriel)\nSlake(leighton, ritch)\nBravo(ritch, karoly)\nnot Bravo(ritch, aeriel)\nnot Blatant(ritch)\nIridesce(karoly, ritch)\nIridesce(karoly, aeriel)\nBravo(aeriel, ritch)\nBravo(aeriel, karoly)\nIridesce(aeriel, karoly)\nforall x (Iridesce(x, aeriel) -> Syrupy(aeriel))\nforall x (Bravo(x, ritch) and Syrupy(x) -> Slake(ritch, aeriel))\n\nnot Cold(aeriel)\n\nnot Cold(aeriel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The issie improvize the aurelie. The issie backslide the ronny. The ronny improvize the arthur. The ronny does not chase the aurelie. The ronny is not fooling. The arthur tousle the ronny. The arthur tousle the aurelie. The aurelie improvize the ronny. The aurelie improvize the arthur. The aurelie tousle the arthur. If something tousle the aurelie then the aurelie is aeschylean. If something improvize the ronny and it is aeschylean then the ronny backslide the aurelie. The aurelie tousle the issie.", "logic": "\nImprovize(issie, aurelie)\nBackslide(issie, ronny)\nImprovize(ronny, arthur)\nnot Improvize(ronny, aurelie)\nnot Fooling(ronny)\nTousle(arthur, ronny)\nTousle(arthur, aurelie)\nImprovize(aurelie, ronny)\nImprovize(aurelie, arthur)\nTousle(aurelie, arthur)\nforall x (Tousle(x, aurelie) -> Aeschylean(aurelie))\nforall x (Improvize(x, ronny) and Aeschylean(x) -> Backslide(ronny, aurelie))\n\nTousle(aurelie, issie)\n\nTousle(aurelie, issie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-896"} {"premises": "The rani curtail the nicky. The bing is sacred. The bing is lacteal. The bing snick the rani. The bing snick the nicky. The bing snick the lishe. The nicky curtail the rani. The nicky vilify the lishe. The nicky snick the bing. The lishe vilify the nicky. If someone is xvii then they chase the rani. If someone snick the nicky then they are xvii. The nicky curtail the rani.", "logic": "\nCurtail(rani, nicky)\nSacred(bing)\nLacteal(bing)\nSnick(bing, rani)\nSnick(bing, nicky)\nSnick(bing, lishe)\nCurtail(nicky, rani)\nVilify(nicky, lishe)\nSnick(nicky, bing)\nVilify(lishe, nicky)\nforall x (Xvii(x) -> Curtail(x, rani))\nforall x (Snick(x, nicky) -> Xvii(x))\n\nCurtail(nicky, rani)\n\ntherefore Curtail(nicky, rani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The odie fleece the quinton. The jay is abstemious. The jay is erect. The jay rosin the odie. The jay rosin the quinton. The jay rosin the gratiana. The quinton fleece the odie. The quinton pamper the gratiana. The quinton rosin the jay. The gratiana pamper the quinton. If someone is elliptic then they chase the odie. If someone rosin the quinton then they are elliptic. The odie does not chase the quinton.", "logic": "\nFleece(odie, quinton)\nAbstemious(jay)\nErect(jay)\nRosin(jay, odie)\nRosin(jay, quinton)\nRosin(jay, gratiana)\nFleece(quinton, odie)\nPamper(quinton, gratiana)\nRosin(quinton, jay)\nPamper(gratiana, quinton)\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Fleece(x, odie))\nforall x (Rosin(x, quinton) -> Elliptic(x))\n\nnot Fleece(odie, quinton)\n\ntherefore Fleece(odie, quinton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The alexi click the dennie. The glori is senescent. The glori is nonimmune. The glori drown the alexi. The glori drown the dennie. The glori drown the lottie. The dennie click the alexi. The dennie reship the lottie. The dennie drown the glori. The lottie reship the dennie. If someone is juridical then they chase the alexi. If someone drown the dennie then they are juridical. The glori is juridical.", "logic": "\nClick(alexi, dennie)\nSenescent(glori)\nNonimmune(glori)\nDrown(glori, alexi)\nDrown(glori, dennie)\nDrown(glori, lottie)\nClick(dennie, alexi)\nReship(dennie, lottie)\nDrown(dennie, glori)\nReship(lottie, dennie)\nforall x (Juridical(x) -> Click(x, alexi))\nforall x (Drown(x, dennie) -> Juridical(x))\n\nJuridical(glori)\n\nDrown(glori, dennie) and forall x (Drown(x, dennie) -> Juridical(x)) -> therefore Juridical(glori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The merrily quit the sayre. The pepita is perfected. The pepita is jordanian. The pepita solmizate the merrily. The pepita solmizate the sayre. The pepita solmizate the lionel. The sayre quit the merrily. The sayre appal the lionel. The sayre solmizate the pepita. The lionel appal the sayre. If someone is daunted then they chase the merrily. If someone solmizate the sayre then they are daunted. The pepita is not daunted.", "logic": "\nQuit(merrily, sayre)\nPerfected(pepita)\nJordanian(pepita)\nSolmizate(pepita, merrily)\nSolmizate(pepita, sayre)\nSolmizate(pepita, lionel)\nQuit(sayre, merrily)\nAppal(sayre, lionel)\nSolmizate(sayre, pepita)\nAppal(lionel, sayre)\nforall x (Daunted(x) -> Quit(x, merrily))\nforall x (Solmizate(x, sayre) -> Daunted(x))\n\nnot Daunted(pepita)\n\nSolmizate(pepita, sayre) and forall x (Solmizate(x, sayre) -> Daunted(x)) -> therefore Daunted(pepita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The phedra scrub the gayleen. The selestina is beginning. The selestina is canted. The selestina ramble the phedra. The selestina ramble the gayleen. The selestina ramble the simon. The gayleen scrub the phedra. The gayleen thoriate the simon. The gayleen ramble the selestina. The simon thoriate the gayleen. If someone is orderly then they chase the phedra. If someone ramble the gayleen then they are orderly. The selestina scrub the phedra.", "logic": "\nScrub(phedra, gayleen)\nBeginning(selestina)\nCanted(selestina)\nRamble(selestina, phedra)\nRamble(selestina, gayleen)\nRamble(selestina, simon)\nScrub(gayleen, phedra)\nThoriate(gayleen, simon)\nRamble(gayleen, selestina)\nThoriate(simon, gayleen)\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Scrub(x, phedra))\nforall x (Ramble(x, gayleen) -> Orderly(x))\n\nScrub(selestina, phedra)\n\nRamble(selestina, gayleen) and forall x (Ramble(x, gayleen) -> Orderly(x)) -> therefore Orderly(selestina) Orderly(selestina) and forall x (Orderly(x) -> Scrub(x, phedra)) -> therefore Scrub(selestina, phedra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The nil reticulate the mercy. The adolf is unvigilant. The adolf is larger. The adolf dogsled the nil. The adolf dogsled the mercy. The adolf dogsled the lauri. The mercy reticulate the nil. The mercy nosedive the lauri. The mercy dogsled the adolf. The lauri nosedive the mercy. If someone is liberal then they chase the nil. If someone dogsled the mercy then they are liberal. The adolf does not chase the nil.", "logic": "\nReticulate(nil, mercy)\nUnvigilant(adolf)\nLarger(adolf)\nDogsled(adolf, nil)\nDogsled(adolf, mercy)\nDogsled(adolf, lauri)\nReticulate(mercy, nil)\nNosedive(mercy, lauri)\nDogsled(mercy, adolf)\nNosedive(lauri, mercy)\nforall x (Liberal(x) -> Reticulate(x, nil))\nforall x (Dogsled(x, mercy) -> Liberal(x))\n\nnot Reticulate(adolf, nil)\n\nDogsled(adolf, mercy) and forall x (Dogsled(x, mercy) -> Liberal(x)) -> therefore Liberal(adolf) Liberal(adolf) and forall x (Liberal(x) -> Reticulate(x, nil)) -> therefore Reticulate(adolf, nil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The anatollo marshal the witold. The ransom is telltale. The ransom is malcontent. The ransom intone the anatollo. The ransom intone the witold. The ransom intone the april. The witold marshal the anatollo. The witold anatomise the april. The witold intone the ransom. The april anatomise the witold. If someone is purebred then they chase the anatollo. If someone intone the witold then they are purebred. The witold is not purebred.", "logic": "\nMarshal(anatollo, witold)\nTelltale(ransom)\nMalcontent(ransom)\nIntone(ransom, anatollo)\nIntone(ransom, witold)\nIntone(ransom, april)\nMarshal(witold, anatollo)\nAnatomise(witold, april)\nIntone(witold, ransom)\nAnatomise(april, witold)\nforall x (Purebred(x) -> Marshal(x, anatollo))\nforall x (Intone(x, witold) -> Purebred(x))\n\nnot Purebred(witold)\n\nforall x (Intone(x, witold) -> Purebred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The sonni clangor the emile. The oralia is hormonal. The oralia is moony. The oralia decelerate the sonni. The oralia decelerate the emile. The oralia decelerate the naomi. The emile clangor the sonni. The emile supervene the naomi. The emile decelerate the oralia. The naomi supervene the emile. If someone is least then they chase the sonni. If someone decelerate the emile then they are least. The naomi is least.", "logic": "\nClangor(sonni, emile)\nHormonal(oralia)\nMoony(oralia)\nDecelerate(oralia, sonni)\nDecelerate(oralia, emile)\nDecelerate(oralia, naomi)\nClangor(emile, sonni)\nSupervene(emile, naomi)\nDecelerate(emile, oralia)\nSupervene(naomi, emile)\nforall x (Least(x) -> Clangor(x, sonni))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, emile) -> Least(x))\n\nLeast(naomi)\n\nforall x (Decelerate(x, emile) -> Least(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The sybille rappel the aziz. The donnajean is unstressed. The donnajean is girlish. The donnajean saponify the sybille. The donnajean saponify the aziz. The donnajean saponify the noah. The aziz rappel the sybille. The aziz perm the noah. The aziz saponify the donnajean. The noah perm the aziz. If someone is undesigned then they chase the sybille. If someone saponify the aziz then they are undesigned. The sybille is not undesigned.", "logic": "\nRappel(sybille, aziz)\nUnstressed(donnajean)\nGirlish(donnajean)\nSaponify(donnajean, sybille)\nSaponify(donnajean, aziz)\nSaponify(donnajean, noah)\nRappel(aziz, sybille)\nPerm(aziz, noah)\nSaponify(aziz, donnajean)\nPerm(noah, aziz)\nforall x (Undesigned(x) -> Rappel(x, sybille))\nforall x (Saponify(x, aziz) -> Undesigned(x))\n\nnot Undesigned(sybille)\n\nforall x (Saponify(x, aziz) -> Undesigned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The silvan invaginate the arron. The andrew is untroubled. The andrew is scrotal. The andrew solarize the silvan. The andrew solarize the arron. The andrew solarize the tressa. The arron invaginate the silvan. The arron crinkle the tressa. The arron solarize the andrew. The tressa crinkle the arron. If someone is emergent then they chase the silvan. If someone solarize the arron then they are emergent. The silvan solarize the tressa.", "logic": "\nInvaginate(silvan, arron)\nUntroubled(andrew)\nScrotal(andrew)\nSolarize(andrew, silvan)\nSolarize(andrew, arron)\nSolarize(andrew, tressa)\nInvaginate(arron, silvan)\nCrinkle(arron, tressa)\nSolarize(arron, andrew)\nCrinkle(tressa, arron)\nforall x (Emergent(x) -> Invaginate(x, silvan))\nforall x (Solarize(x, arron) -> Emergent(x))\n\nSolarize(silvan, tressa)\n\nSolarize(silvan, tressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The melvyn distribute the emory. The pierrette is lysogenic. The pierrette is protrusive. The pierrette amerce the melvyn. The pierrette amerce the emory. The pierrette amerce the theo. The emory distribute the melvyn. The emory baronetise the theo. The emory amerce the pierrette. The theo baronetise the emory. If someone is federal then they chase the melvyn. If someone amerce the emory then they are federal. The melvyn is not rough.", "logic": "\nDistribute(melvyn, emory)\nLysogenic(pierrette)\nProtrusive(pierrette)\nAmerce(pierrette, melvyn)\nAmerce(pierrette, emory)\nAmerce(pierrette, theo)\nDistribute(emory, melvyn)\nBaronetise(emory, theo)\nAmerce(emory, pierrette)\nBaronetise(theo, emory)\nforall x (Federal(x) -> Distribute(x, melvyn))\nforall x (Amerce(x, emory) -> Federal(x))\n\nnot Rough(melvyn)\n\nnot Rough(melvyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The elinore flit the ishmael. The eustace is visceral. The eustace is prissy. The eustace fragment the elinore. The eustace fragment the ishmael. The eustace fragment the nalani. The ishmael flit the elinore. The ishmael ambulate the nalani. The ishmael fragment the eustace. The nalani ambulate the ishmael. If someone is unrevealed then they chase the elinore. If someone fragment the ishmael then they are unrevealed. The ishmael fragment the ishmael.", "logic": "\nFlit(elinore, ishmael)\nVisceral(eustace)\nPrissy(eustace)\nFragment(eustace, elinore)\nFragment(eustace, ishmael)\nFragment(eustace, nalani)\nFlit(ishmael, elinore)\nAmbulate(ishmael, nalani)\nFragment(ishmael, eustace)\nAmbulate(nalani, ishmael)\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Flit(x, elinore))\nforall x (Fragment(x, ishmael) -> Unrevealed(x))\n\nFragment(ishmael, ishmael)\n\nFragment(ishmael, ishmael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1128"} {"premises": "The aggy fluoridize the oral. The aggy is disabling. The aggy is covered. The aggy cleat the oral. The oral fluoridize the aggy. The oral antiquate the aggy. The oral is acerose. The oral is arch. The oral is covered. The oral cleat the aggy. If something antiquate the oral and the oral is covered then it antiquate the aggy. If something antiquate the oral and the oral cleat the aggy then the aggy is acerose. If something cleat the aggy and the aggy does not see the oral then the aggy is seemly. If something cleat the aggy then the aggy antiquate the oral. If something is arch then it fluoridize the aggy. If the oral is acerose and the oral is disabling then the oral cleat the aggy. The oral antiquate the aggy.", "logic": "\nFluoridize(aggy, oral)\nDisabling(aggy)\nCovered(aggy)\nCleat(aggy, oral)\nFluoridize(oral, aggy)\nAntiquate(oral, aggy)\nAcerose(oral)\nArch(oral)\nCovered(oral)\nCleat(oral, aggy)\nforall x (Antiquate(x, oral) and Covered(oral) -> Antiquate(x, aggy))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, oral) and Cleat(oral, aggy) -> Acerose(aggy))\nforall x (Cleat(x, aggy) and not Cleat(aggy, oral) -> Seemly(aggy))\nforall x (Cleat(x, aggy) -> Antiquate(aggy, oral))\nforall x (Arch(x) -> Fluoridize(x, aggy))\nAcerose(oral) and Disabling(oral) -> Cleat(oral, aggy)\n\nAntiquate(oral, aggy)\n\ntherefore Antiquate(oral, aggy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The skylar unbalance the winn. The skylar is heroical. The skylar is unpierced. The skylar pillory the winn. The winn unbalance the skylar. The winn stain the skylar. The winn is grooved. The winn is podlike. The winn is unpierced. The winn pillory the skylar. If something stain the winn and the winn is unpierced then it stain the skylar. If something stain the winn and the winn pillory the skylar then the skylar is grooved. If something pillory the skylar and the skylar does not see the winn then the skylar is duodenal. If something pillory the skylar then the skylar stain the winn. If something is podlike then it unbalance the skylar. If the winn is grooved and the winn is heroical then the winn pillory the skylar. The winn is not unpierced.", "logic": "\nUnbalance(skylar, winn)\nHeroical(skylar)\nUnpierced(skylar)\nPillory(skylar, winn)\nUnbalance(winn, skylar)\nStain(winn, skylar)\nGrooved(winn)\nPodlike(winn)\nUnpierced(winn)\nPillory(winn, skylar)\nforall x (Stain(x, winn) and Unpierced(winn) -> Stain(x, skylar))\nforall x (Stain(x, winn) and Pillory(winn, skylar) -> Grooved(skylar))\nforall x (Pillory(x, skylar) and not Pillory(skylar, winn) -> Duodenal(skylar))\nforall x (Pillory(x, skylar) -> Stain(skylar, winn))\nforall x (Podlike(x) -> Unbalance(x, skylar))\nGrooved(winn) and Heroical(winn) -> Pillory(winn, skylar)\n\nnot Unpierced(winn)\n\ntherefore Unpierced(winn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The reena abridge the burnaby. The reena is unsought. The reena is unbraced. The reena solemnize the burnaby. The burnaby abridge the reena. The burnaby powder the reena. The burnaby is unsaved. The burnaby is expiratory. The burnaby is unbraced. The burnaby solemnize the reena. If something powder the burnaby and the burnaby is unbraced then it powder the reena. If something powder the burnaby and the burnaby solemnize the reena then the reena is unsaved. If something solemnize the reena and the reena does not see the burnaby then the reena is limited. If something solemnize the reena then the reena powder the burnaby. If something is expiratory then it abridge the reena. If the burnaby is unsaved and the burnaby is unsought then the burnaby solemnize the reena. The reena powder the burnaby.", "logic": "\nAbridge(reena, burnaby)\nUnsought(reena)\nUnbraced(reena)\nSolemnize(reena, burnaby)\nAbridge(burnaby, reena)\nPowder(burnaby, reena)\nUnsaved(burnaby)\nExpiratory(burnaby)\nUnbraced(burnaby)\nSolemnize(burnaby, reena)\nforall x (Powder(x, burnaby) and Unbraced(burnaby) -> Powder(x, reena))\nforall x (Powder(x, burnaby) and Solemnize(burnaby, reena) -> Unsaved(reena))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, reena) and not Solemnize(reena, burnaby) -> Limited(reena))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, reena) -> Powder(reena, burnaby))\nforall x (Expiratory(x) -> Abridge(x, reena))\nUnsaved(burnaby) and Unsought(burnaby) -> Solemnize(burnaby, reena)\n\nPowder(reena, burnaby)\n\nSolemnize(burnaby, reena) and forall x (Solemnize(x, reena) -> Powder(reena, burnaby)) -> therefore Powder(reena, burnaby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The teodora domineer the noel. The teodora is aphetic. The teodora is protecting. The teodora apotheose the noel. The noel domineer the teodora. The noel stylise the teodora. The noel is algerian. The noel is semite. The noel is protecting. The noel apotheose the teodora. If something stylise the noel and the noel is protecting then it stylise the teodora. If something stylise the noel and the noel apotheose the teodora then the teodora is algerian. If something apotheose the teodora and the teodora does not see the noel then the teodora is fascinated. If something apotheose the teodora then the teodora stylise the noel. If something is semite then it domineer the teodora. If the noel is algerian and the noel is aphetic then the noel apotheose the teodora. The teodora does not eat the noel.", "logic": "\nDomineer(teodora, noel)\nAphetic(teodora)\nProtecting(teodora)\nApotheose(teodora, noel)\nDomineer(noel, teodora)\nStylise(noel, teodora)\nAlgerian(noel)\nSemite(noel)\nProtecting(noel)\nApotheose(noel, teodora)\nforall x (Stylise(x, noel) and Protecting(noel) -> Stylise(x, teodora))\nforall x (Stylise(x, noel) and Apotheose(noel, teodora) -> Algerian(teodora))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, teodora) and not Apotheose(teodora, noel) -> Fascinated(teodora))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, teodora) -> Stylise(teodora, noel))\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Domineer(x, teodora))\nAlgerian(noel) and Aphetic(noel) -> Apotheose(noel, teodora)\n\nnot Stylise(teodora, noel)\n\nApotheose(noel, teodora) and forall x (Apotheose(x, teodora) -> Stylise(teodora, noel)) -> therefore Stylise(teodora, noel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The tobit cloud the elfie. The tobit is braised. The tobit is metrical. The tobit breathe the elfie. The elfie cloud the tobit. The elfie permeate the tobit. The elfie is burnable. The elfie is cacuminal. The elfie is metrical. The elfie breathe the tobit. If something permeate the elfie and the elfie is metrical then it permeate the tobit. If something permeate the elfie and the elfie breathe the tobit then the tobit is burnable. If something breathe the tobit and the tobit does not see the elfie then the tobit is emotional. If something breathe the tobit then the tobit permeate the elfie. If something is cacuminal then it cloud the tobit. If the elfie is burnable and the elfie is braised then the elfie breathe the tobit. The tobit is burnable.", "logic": "\nCloud(tobit, elfie)\nBraised(tobit)\nMetrical(tobit)\nBreathe(tobit, elfie)\nCloud(elfie, tobit)\nPermeate(elfie, tobit)\nBurnable(elfie)\nCacuminal(elfie)\nMetrical(elfie)\nBreathe(elfie, tobit)\nforall x (Permeate(x, elfie) and Metrical(elfie) -> Permeate(x, tobit))\nforall x (Permeate(x, elfie) and Breathe(elfie, tobit) -> Burnable(tobit))\nforall x (Breathe(x, tobit) and not Breathe(tobit, elfie) -> Emotional(tobit))\nforall x (Breathe(x, tobit) -> Permeate(tobit, elfie))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) -> Cloud(x, tobit))\nBurnable(elfie) and Braised(elfie) -> Breathe(elfie, tobit)\n\nBurnable(tobit)\n\nBreathe(elfie, tobit) and forall x (Breathe(x, tobit) -> Permeate(tobit, elfie)) -> therefore Permeate(tobit, elfie) Permeate(tobit, elfie) and Breathe(elfie, tobit) and forall x (Permeate(x, elfie) and Breathe(elfie, tobit) -> Burnable(tobit)) -> therefore Burnable(tobit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The harrold plead the ignace. The harrold is annoying. The harrold is utmost. The harrold export the ignace. The ignace plead the harrold. The ignace prolapse the harrold. The ignace is solvable. The ignace is annoyed. The ignace is utmost. The ignace export the harrold. If something prolapse the ignace and the ignace is utmost then it prolapse the harrold. If something prolapse the ignace and the ignace export the harrold then the harrold is solvable. If something export the harrold and the harrold does not see the ignace then the harrold is unmeasured. If something export the harrold then the harrold prolapse the ignace. If something is annoyed then it plead the harrold. If the ignace is solvable and the ignace is annoying then the ignace export the harrold. The harrold is not solvable.", "logic": "\nPlead(harrold, ignace)\nAnnoying(harrold)\nUtmost(harrold)\nExport(harrold, ignace)\nPlead(ignace, harrold)\nProlapse(ignace, harrold)\nSolvable(ignace)\nAnnoyed(ignace)\nUtmost(ignace)\nExport(ignace, harrold)\nforall x (Prolapse(x, ignace) and Utmost(ignace) -> Prolapse(x, harrold))\nforall x (Prolapse(x, ignace) and Export(ignace, harrold) -> Solvable(harrold))\nforall x (Export(x, harrold) and not Export(harrold, ignace) -> Unmeasured(harrold))\nforall x (Export(x, harrold) -> Prolapse(harrold, ignace))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Plead(x, harrold))\nSolvable(ignace) and Annoying(ignace) -> Export(ignace, harrold)\n\nnot Solvable(harrold)\n\nExport(ignace, harrold) and forall x (Export(x, harrold) -> Prolapse(harrold, ignace)) -> therefore Prolapse(harrold, ignace) Prolapse(harrold, ignace) and Export(ignace, harrold) and forall x (Prolapse(x, ignace) and Export(ignace, harrold) -> Solvable(harrold)) -> therefore Solvable(harrold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The ragnar devaluate the eolanda. The ragnar is twisted. The ragnar is endodontic. The ragnar crisp the eolanda. The eolanda devaluate the ragnar. The eolanda abseil the ragnar. The eolanda is tethered. The eolanda is bold. The eolanda is endodontic. The eolanda crisp the ragnar. If something abseil the eolanda and the eolanda is endodontic then it abseil the ragnar. If something abseil the eolanda and the eolanda crisp the ragnar then the ragnar is tethered. If something crisp the ragnar and the ragnar does not see the eolanda then the ragnar is incredible. If something crisp the ragnar then the ragnar abseil the eolanda. If something is bold then it devaluate the ragnar. If the eolanda is tethered and the eolanda is twisted then the eolanda crisp the ragnar. The ragnar does not chase the ragnar.", "logic": "\nDevaluate(ragnar, eolanda)\nTwisted(ragnar)\nEndodontic(ragnar)\nCrisp(ragnar, eolanda)\nDevaluate(eolanda, ragnar)\nAbseil(eolanda, ragnar)\nTethered(eolanda)\nBold(eolanda)\nEndodontic(eolanda)\nCrisp(eolanda, ragnar)\nforall x (Abseil(x, eolanda) and Endodontic(eolanda) -> Abseil(x, ragnar))\nforall x (Abseil(x, eolanda) and Crisp(eolanda, ragnar) -> Tethered(ragnar))\nforall x (Crisp(x, ragnar) and not Crisp(ragnar, eolanda) -> Incredible(ragnar))\nforall x (Crisp(x, ragnar) -> Abseil(ragnar, eolanda))\nforall x (Bold(x) -> Devaluate(x, ragnar))\nTethered(eolanda) and Twisted(eolanda) -> Crisp(eolanda, ragnar)\n\nnot Devaluate(ragnar, ragnar)\n\nforall x (Bold(x) -> Devaluate(x, ragnar)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The tessa ozonize the denni. The tessa is toughened. The tessa is asleep. The tessa develop the denni. The denni ozonize the tessa. The denni scribble the tessa. The denni is nontaxable. The denni is encyclical. The denni is asleep. The denni develop the tessa. If something scribble the denni and the denni is asleep then it scribble the tessa. If something scribble the denni and the denni develop the tessa then the tessa is nontaxable. If something develop the tessa and the tessa does not see the denni then the tessa is erectile. If something develop the tessa then the tessa scribble the denni. If something is encyclical then it ozonize the tessa. If the denni is nontaxable and the denni is toughened then the denni develop the tessa. The tessa is erectile.", "logic": "\nOzonize(tessa, denni)\nToughened(tessa)\nAsleep(tessa)\nDevelop(tessa, denni)\nOzonize(denni, tessa)\nScribble(denni, tessa)\nNontaxable(denni)\nEncyclical(denni)\nAsleep(denni)\nDevelop(denni, tessa)\nforall x (Scribble(x, denni) and Asleep(denni) -> Scribble(x, tessa))\nforall x (Scribble(x, denni) and Develop(denni, tessa) -> Nontaxable(tessa))\nforall x (Develop(x, tessa) and not Develop(tessa, denni) -> Erectile(tessa))\nforall x (Develop(x, tessa) -> Scribble(tessa, denni))\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Ozonize(x, tessa))\nNontaxable(denni) and Toughened(denni) -> Develop(denni, tessa)\n\nErectile(tessa)\n\nforall x (Develop(x, tessa) and not Develop(tessa, denni) -> Erectile(tessa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The torrence souse the marlow. The torrence is demanding. The torrence is acerate. The torrence sexualise the marlow. The marlow souse the torrence. The marlow foreclose the torrence. The marlow is godly. The marlow is wriggling. The marlow is acerate. The marlow sexualise the torrence. If something foreclose the marlow and the marlow is acerate then it foreclose the torrence. If something foreclose the marlow and the marlow sexualise the torrence then the torrence is godly. If something sexualise the torrence and the torrence does not see the marlow then the torrence is wearying. If something sexualise the torrence then the torrence foreclose the marlow. If something is wriggling then it souse the torrence. If the marlow is godly and the marlow is demanding then the marlow sexualise the torrence. The marlow does not see the marlow.", "logic": "\nSouse(torrence, marlow)\nDemanding(torrence)\nAcerate(torrence)\nSexualise(torrence, marlow)\nSouse(marlow, torrence)\nForeclose(marlow, torrence)\nGodly(marlow)\nWriggling(marlow)\nAcerate(marlow)\nSexualise(marlow, torrence)\nforall x (Foreclose(x, marlow) and Acerate(marlow) -> Foreclose(x, torrence))\nforall x (Foreclose(x, marlow) and Sexualise(marlow, torrence) -> Godly(torrence))\nforall x (Sexualise(x, torrence) and not Sexualise(torrence, marlow) -> Wearying(torrence))\nforall x (Sexualise(x, torrence) -> Foreclose(torrence, marlow))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Souse(x, torrence))\nGodly(marlow) and Demanding(marlow) -> Sexualise(marlow, torrence)\n\nnot Sexualise(marlow, marlow)\n\nnot Sexualise(marlow, marlow) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The rochester discourage the tait. The rochester is unethical. The rochester is congenial. The rochester appraise the tait. The tait discourage the rochester. The tait moan the rochester. The tait is precious. The tait is unsettled. The tait is congenial. The tait appraise the rochester. If something moan the tait and the tait is congenial then it moan the rochester. If something moan the tait and the tait appraise the rochester then the rochester is precious. If something appraise the rochester and the rochester does not see the tait then the rochester is locomotor. If something appraise the rochester then the rochester moan the tait. If something is unsettled then it discourage the rochester. If the tait is precious and the tait is unethical then the tait appraise the rochester. The rochester appraise the rochester.", "logic": "\nDiscourage(rochester, tait)\nUnethical(rochester)\nCongenial(rochester)\nAppraise(rochester, tait)\nDiscourage(tait, rochester)\nMoan(tait, rochester)\nPrecious(tait)\nUnsettled(tait)\nCongenial(tait)\nAppraise(tait, rochester)\nforall x (Moan(x, tait) and Congenial(tait) -> Moan(x, rochester))\nforall x (Moan(x, tait) and Appraise(tait, rochester) -> Precious(rochester))\nforall x (Appraise(x, rochester) and not Appraise(rochester, tait) -> Locomotor(rochester))\nforall x (Appraise(x, rochester) -> Moan(rochester, tait))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) -> Discourage(x, rochester))\nPrecious(tait) and Unethical(tait) -> Appraise(tait, rochester)\n\nAppraise(rochester, rochester)\n\nAppraise(rochester, rochester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The heda bestialise the pierre. The heda is hastate. The heda is bistered. The heda ligate the pierre. The pierre bestialise the heda. The pierre vivify the heda. The pierre is employed. The pierre is chaffy. The pierre is bistered. The pierre ligate the heda. If something vivify the pierre and the pierre is bistered then it vivify the heda. If something vivify the pierre and the pierre ligate the heda then the heda is employed. If something ligate the heda and the heda does not see the pierre then the heda is shot. If something ligate the heda then the heda vivify the pierre. If something is chaffy then it bestialise the heda. If the pierre is employed and the pierre is hastate then the pierre ligate the heda. The pierre does not chase the pierre.", "logic": "\nBestialise(heda, pierre)\nHastate(heda)\nBistered(heda)\nLigate(heda, pierre)\nBestialise(pierre, heda)\nVivify(pierre, heda)\nEmployed(pierre)\nChaffy(pierre)\nBistered(pierre)\nLigate(pierre, heda)\nforall x (Vivify(x, pierre) and Bistered(pierre) -> Vivify(x, heda))\nforall x (Vivify(x, pierre) and Ligate(pierre, heda) -> Employed(heda))\nforall x (Ligate(x, heda) and not Ligate(heda, pierre) -> Shot(heda))\nforall x (Ligate(x, heda) -> Vivify(heda, pierre))\nforall x (Chaffy(x) -> Bestialise(x, heda))\nEmployed(pierre) and Hastate(pierre) -> Ligate(pierre, heda)\n\nnot Bestialise(pierre, pierre)\n\nnot Bestialise(pierre, pierre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The cris cement the sella. The cris is nepali. The cris is titulary. The cris streak the sella. The sella cement the cris. The sella transmit the cris. The sella is excused. The sella is cleavable. The sella is titulary. The sella streak the cris. If something transmit the sella and the sella is titulary then it transmit the cris. If something transmit the sella and the sella streak the cris then the cris is excused. If something streak the cris and the cris does not see the sella then the cris is geriatric. If something streak the cris then the cris transmit the sella. If something is cleavable then it cement the cris. If the sella is excused and the sella is nepali then the sella streak the cris. The sella transmit the sella.", "logic": "\nCement(cris, sella)\nNepali(cris)\nTitulary(cris)\nStreak(cris, sella)\nCement(sella, cris)\nTransmit(sella, cris)\nExcused(sella)\nCleavable(sella)\nTitulary(sella)\nStreak(sella, cris)\nforall x (Transmit(x, sella) and Titulary(sella) -> Transmit(x, cris))\nforall x (Transmit(x, sella) and Streak(sella, cris) -> Excused(cris))\nforall x (Streak(x, cris) and not Streak(cris, sella) -> Geriatric(cris))\nforall x (Streak(x, cris) -> Transmit(cris, sella))\nforall x (Cleavable(x) -> Cement(x, cris))\nExcused(sella) and Nepali(sella) -> Streak(sella, cris)\n\nTransmit(sella, sella)\n\nTransmit(sella, sella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-639"} {"premises": "The silvie is reducible. The silvie does not see the malory. The silvie slalom the chrissy. The silvie slalom the torr. The silvie palaver the chrissy. The malory slalom the silvie. The malory slalom the torr. The chrissy is craggy. The chrissy slalom the malory. The torr is noduled. The torr comfit the malory. The torr comfit the chrissy. If someone slalom the malory then they visit the silvie. If someone slalom the chrissy and they do not visit the malory then they are craggy. If someone palaver the torr then they do not see the silvie. If the chrissy is not reducible and the chrissy does not need the torr then the chrissy comfit the malory. If the silvie does not visit the chrissy then the chrissy is burlesque. If someone palaver the silvie then they need the chrissy. If the torr is unsought and the torr palaver the silvie then the silvie does not visit the torr. If the chrissy comfit the torr and the torr does not need the chrissy then the torr comfit the malory. The torr comfit the chrissy.", "logic": "\nReducible(silvie)\nnot Slalom(silvie, malory)\nSlalom(silvie, chrissy)\nSlalom(silvie, torr)\nPalaver(silvie, chrissy)\nSlalom(malory, silvie)\nSlalom(malory, torr)\nCraggy(chrissy)\nSlalom(chrissy, malory)\nNoduled(torr)\nComfit(torr, malory)\nComfit(torr, chrissy)\nforall x (Slalom(x, malory) -> Palaver(x, silvie))\nforall x (Slalom(x, chrissy) and not Palaver(x, malory) -> Craggy(x))\nforall x (Palaver(x, torr) -> not Slalom(x, silvie))\nnot Reducible(chrissy) and not Comfit(chrissy, torr) -> Comfit(chrissy, malory)\nnot Palaver(silvie, chrissy) -> Burlesque(chrissy)\nforall x (Palaver(x, silvie) -> Comfit(x, chrissy))\nUnsought(torr) and Palaver(torr, silvie) -> not Palaver(silvie, torr)\nComfit(chrissy, torr) and not Comfit(torr, chrissy) -> Comfit(torr, malory)\n\nComfit(torr, chrissy)\n\ntherefore Comfit(torr, chrissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The shaun is nibbed. The shaun does not see the lottie. The shaun vulgarize the tresa. The shaun vulgarize the ree. The shaun tantalise the tresa. The lottie vulgarize the shaun. The lottie vulgarize the ree. The tresa is recyclable. The tresa vulgarize the lottie. The ree is extralegal. The ree dare the lottie. The ree dare the tresa. If someone vulgarize the lottie then they visit the shaun. If someone vulgarize the tresa and they do not visit the lottie then they are recyclable. If someone tantalise the ree then they do not see the shaun. If the tresa is not nibbed and the tresa does not need the ree then the tresa dare the lottie. If the shaun does not visit the tresa then the tresa is antitrust. If someone tantalise the shaun then they need the tresa. If the ree is sclerotic and the ree tantalise the shaun then the shaun does not visit the ree. If the tresa dare the ree and the ree does not need the tresa then the ree dare the lottie. The shaun does not visit the tresa.", "logic": "\nNibbed(shaun)\nnot Vulgarize(shaun, lottie)\nVulgarize(shaun, tresa)\nVulgarize(shaun, ree)\nTantalise(shaun, tresa)\nVulgarize(lottie, shaun)\nVulgarize(lottie, ree)\nRecyclable(tresa)\nVulgarize(tresa, lottie)\nExtralegal(ree)\nDare(ree, lottie)\nDare(ree, tresa)\nforall x (Vulgarize(x, lottie) -> Tantalise(x, shaun))\nforall x (Vulgarize(x, tresa) and not Tantalise(x, lottie) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Tantalise(x, ree) -> not Vulgarize(x, shaun))\nnot Nibbed(tresa) and not Dare(tresa, ree) -> Dare(tresa, lottie)\nnot Tantalise(shaun, tresa) -> Antitrust(tresa)\nforall x (Tantalise(x, shaun) -> Dare(x, tresa))\nSclerotic(ree) and Tantalise(ree, shaun) -> not Tantalise(shaun, ree)\nDare(tresa, ree) and not Dare(ree, tresa) -> Dare(ree, lottie)\n\nnot Tantalise(shaun, tresa)\n\ntherefore Tantalise(shaun, tresa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The shaine is hazel. The shaine does not see the skyler. The shaine boast the valenka. The shaine boast the tasha. The shaine damage the valenka. The skyler boast the shaine. The skyler boast the tasha. The valenka is unwavering. The valenka boast the skyler. The tasha is archaic. The tasha dote the skyler. The tasha dote the valenka. If someone boast the skyler then they visit the shaine. If someone boast the valenka and they do not visit the skyler then they are unwavering. If someone damage the tasha then they do not see the shaine. If the valenka is not hazel and the valenka does not need the tasha then the valenka dote the skyler. If the shaine does not visit the valenka then the valenka is audacious. If someone damage the shaine then they need the valenka. If the tasha is acetabular and the tasha damage the shaine then the shaine does not visit the tasha. If the valenka dote the tasha and the tasha does not need the valenka then the tasha dote the skyler. The valenka damage the shaine.", "logic": "\nHazel(shaine)\nnot Boast(shaine, skyler)\nBoast(shaine, valenka)\nBoast(shaine, tasha)\nDamage(shaine, valenka)\nBoast(skyler, shaine)\nBoast(skyler, tasha)\nUnwavering(valenka)\nBoast(valenka, skyler)\nArchaic(tasha)\nDote(tasha, skyler)\nDote(tasha, valenka)\nforall x (Boast(x, skyler) -> Damage(x, shaine))\nforall x (Boast(x, valenka) and not Damage(x, skyler) -> Unwavering(x))\nforall x (Damage(x, tasha) -> not Boast(x, shaine))\nnot Hazel(valenka) and not Dote(valenka, tasha) -> Dote(valenka, skyler)\nnot Damage(shaine, valenka) -> Audacious(valenka)\nforall x (Damage(x, shaine) -> Dote(x, valenka))\nAcetabular(tasha) and Damage(tasha, shaine) -> not Damage(shaine, tasha)\nDote(valenka, tasha) and not Dote(tasha, valenka) -> Dote(tasha, skyler)\n\nDamage(valenka, shaine)\n\nBoast(valenka, skyler) and forall x (Boast(x, skyler) -> Damage(x, shaine)) -> therefore Damage(valenka, shaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The gerianna is causal. The gerianna does not see the moll. The gerianna untwist the letisha. The gerianna untwist the willetta. The gerianna ameliorate the letisha. The moll untwist the gerianna. The moll untwist the willetta. The letisha is dyed. The letisha untwist the moll. The willetta is saturated. The willetta worsen the moll. The willetta worsen the letisha. If someone untwist the moll then they visit the gerianna. If someone untwist the letisha and they do not visit the moll then they are dyed. If someone ameliorate the willetta then they do not see the gerianna. If the letisha is not causal and the letisha does not need the willetta then the letisha worsen the moll. If the gerianna does not visit the letisha then the letisha is enjoyable. If someone ameliorate the gerianna then they need the letisha. If the willetta is jejune and the willetta ameliorate the gerianna then the gerianna does not visit the willetta. If the letisha worsen the willetta and the willetta does not need the letisha then the willetta worsen the moll. The letisha does not visit the gerianna.", "logic": "\nCausal(gerianna)\nnot Untwist(gerianna, moll)\nUntwist(gerianna, letisha)\nUntwist(gerianna, willetta)\nAmeliorate(gerianna, letisha)\nUntwist(moll, gerianna)\nUntwist(moll, willetta)\nDyed(letisha)\nUntwist(letisha, moll)\nSaturated(willetta)\nWorsen(willetta, moll)\nWorsen(willetta, letisha)\nforall x (Untwist(x, moll) -> Ameliorate(x, gerianna))\nforall x (Untwist(x, letisha) and not Ameliorate(x, moll) -> Dyed(x))\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, willetta) -> not Untwist(x, gerianna))\nnot Causal(letisha) and not Worsen(letisha, willetta) -> Worsen(letisha, moll)\nnot Ameliorate(gerianna, letisha) -> Enjoyable(letisha)\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, gerianna) -> Worsen(x, letisha))\nJejune(willetta) and Ameliorate(willetta, gerianna) -> not Ameliorate(gerianna, willetta)\nWorsen(letisha, willetta) and not Worsen(willetta, letisha) -> Worsen(willetta, moll)\n\nnot Ameliorate(letisha, gerianna)\n\nUntwist(letisha, moll) and forall x (Untwist(x, moll) -> Ameliorate(x, gerianna)) -> therefore Ameliorate(letisha, gerianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The godwin is civil. The godwin does not see the vachel. The godwin perk the dugan. The godwin perk the kaiser. The godwin collar the dugan. The vachel perk the godwin. The vachel perk the kaiser. The dugan is allusive. The dugan perk the vachel. The kaiser is airless. The kaiser ship the vachel. The kaiser ship the dugan. If someone perk the vachel then they visit the godwin. If someone perk the dugan and they do not visit the vachel then they are allusive. If someone collar the kaiser then they do not see the godwin. If the dugan is not civil and the dugan does not need the kaiser then the dugan ship the vachel. If the godwin does not visit the dugan then the dugan is congealed. If someone collar the godwin then they need the dugan. If the kaiser is filial and the kaiser collar the godwin then the godwin does not visit the kaiser. If the dugan ship the kaiser and the kaiser does not need the dugan then the kaiser ship the vachel. The dugan ship the dugan.", "logic": "\nCivil(godwin)\nnot Perk(godwin, vachel)\nPerk(godwin, dugan)\nPerk(godwin, kaiser)\nCollar(godwin, dugan)\nPerk(vachel, godwin)\nPerk(vachel, kaiser)\nAllusive(dugan)\nPerk(dugan, vachel)\nAirless(kaiser)\nShip(kaiser, vachel)\nShip(kaiser, dugan)\nforall x (Perk(x, vachel) -> Collar(x, godwin))\nforall x (Perk(x, dugan) and not Collar(x, vachel) -> Allusive(x))\nforall x (Collar(x, kaiser) -> not Perk(x, godwin))\nnot Civil(dugan) and not Ship(dugan, kaiser) -> Ship(dugan, vachel)\nnot Collar(godwin, dugan) -> Congealed(dugan)\nforall x (Collar(x, godwin) -> Ship(x, dugan))\nFilial(kaiser) and Collar(kaiser, godwin) -> not Collar(godwin, kaiser)\nShip(dugan, kaiser) and not Ship(kaiser, dugan) -> Ship(kaiser, vachel)\n\nShip(dugan, dugan)\n\nPerk(dugan, vachel) and forall x (Perk(x, vachel) -> Collar(x, godwin)) -> therefore Collar(dugan, godwin) Collar(dugan, godwin) and forall x (Collar(x, godwin) -> Ship(x, dugan)) -> therefore Ship(dugan, dugan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The dugan is ciliate. The dugan does not see the adina. The dugan curtain the lynnet. The dugan curtain the antonie. The dugan moor the lynnet. The adina curtain the dugan. The adina curtain the antonie. The lynnet is apractic. The lynnet curtain the adina. The antonie is unimpaired. The antonie organise the adina. The antonie organise the lynnet. If someone curtain the adina then they visit the dugan. If someone curtain the lynnet and they do not visit the adina then they are apractic. If someone moor the antonie then they do not see the dugan. If the lynnet is not ciliate and the lynnet does not need the antonie then the lynnet organise the adina. If the dugan does not visit the lynnet then the lynnet is bookable. If someone moor the dugan then they need the lynnet. If the antonie is duple and the antonie moor the dugan then the dugan does not visit the antonie. If the lynnet organise the antonie and the antonie does not need the lynnet then the antonie organise the adina. The lynnet does not need the lynnet.", "logic": "\nCiliate(dugan)\nnot Curtain(dugan, adina)\nCurtain(dugan, lynnet)\nCurtain(dugan, antonie)\nMoor(dugan, lynnet)\nCurtain(adina, dugan)\nCurtain(adina, antonie)\nApractic(lynnet)\nCurtain(lynnet, adina)\nUnimpaired(antonie)\nOrganise(antonie, adina)\nOrganise(antonie, lynnet)\nforall x (Curtain(x, adina) -> Moor(x, dugan))\nforall x (Curtain(x, lynnet) and not Moor(x, adina) -> Apractic(x))\nforall x (Moor(x, antonie) -> not Curtain(x, dugan))\nnot Ciliate(lynnet) and not Organise(lynnet, antonie) -> Organise(lynnet, adina)\nnot Moor(dugan, lynnet) -> Bookable(lynnet)\nforall x (Moor(x, dugan) -> Organise(x, lynnet))\nDuple(antonie) and Moor(antonie, dugan) -> not Moor(dugan, antonie)\nOrganise(lynnet, antonie) and not Organise(antonie, lynnet) -> Organise(antonie, adina)\n\nnot Organise(lynnet, lynnet)\n\nCurtain(lynnet, adina) and forall x (Curtain(x, adina) -> Moor(x, dugan)) -> therefore Moor(lynnet, dugan) Moor(lynnet, dugan) and forall x (Moor(x, dugan) -> Organise(x, lynnet)) -> therefore Organise(lynnet, lynnet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The marysa is vertical. The marysa does not see the burta. The marysa phone the melitta. The marysa phone the lev. The marysa quiet the melitta. The burta phone the marysa. The burta phone the lev. The melitta is appendant. The melitta phone the burta. The lev is drifting. The lev intonate the burta. The lev intonate the melitta. If someone phone the burta then they visit the marysa. If someone phone the melitta and they do not visit the burta then they are appendant. If someone quiet the lev then they do not see the marysa. If the melitta is not vertical and the melitta does not need the lev then the melitta intonate the burta. If the marysa does not visit the melitta then the melitta is pursued. If someone quiet the marysa then they need the melitta. If the lev is grumbling and the lev quiet the marysa then the marysa does not visit the lev. If the melitta intonate the lev and the lev does not need the melitta then the lev intonate the burta. The burta does not visit the marysa.", "logic": "\nVertical(marysa)\nnot Phone(marysa, burta)\nPhone(marysa, melitta)\nPhone(marysa, lev)\nQuiet(marysa, melitta)\nPhone(burta, marysa)\nPhone(burta, lev)\nAppendant(melitta)\nPhone(melitta, burta)\nDrifting(lev)\nIntonate(lev, burta)\nIntonate(lev, melitta)\nforall x (Phone(x, burta) -> Quiet(x, marysa))\nforall x (Phone(x, melitta) and not Quiet(x, burta) -> Appendant(x))\nforall x (Quiet(x, lev) -> not Phone(x, marysa))\nnot Vertical(melitta) and not Intonate(melitta, lev) -> Intonate(melitta, burta)\nnot Quiet(marysa, melitta) -> Pursued(melitta)\nforall x (Quiet(x, marysa) -> Intonate(x, melitta))\nGrumbling(lev) and Quiet(lev, marysa) -> not Quiet(marysa, lev)\nIntonate(melitta, lev) and not Intonate(lev, melitta) -> Intonate(lev, burta)\n\nnot Quiet(burta, marysa)\n\nforall x (Phone(x, burta) -> Quiet(x, marysa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The lani is shakedown. The lani does not see the cherida. The lani smut the harrold. The lani smut the whit. The lani guillotine the harrold. The cherida smut the lani. The cherida smut the whit. The harrold is bunchy. The harrold smut the cherida. The whit is dyslectic. The whit bucket the cherida. The whit bucket the harrold. If someone smut the cherida then they visit the lani. If someone smut the harrold and they do not visit the cherida then they are bunchy. If someone guillotine the whit then they do not see the lani. If the harrold is not shakedown and the harrold does not need the whit then the harrold bucket the cherida. If the lani does not visit the harrold then the harrold is achaean. If someone guillotine the lani then they need the harrold. If the whit is filmable and the whit guillotine the lani then the lani does not visit the whit. If the harrold bucket the whit and the whit does not need the harrold then the whit bucket the cherida. The harrold bucket the cherida.", "logic": "\nShakedown(lani)\nnot Smut(lani, cherida)\nSmut(lani, harrold)\nSmut(lani, whit)\nGuillotine(lani, harrold)\nSmut(cherida, lani)\nSmut(cherida, whit)\nBunchy(harrold)\nSmut(harrold, cherida)\nDyslectic(whit)\nBucket(whit, cherida)\nBucket(whit, harrold)\nforall x (Smut(x, cherida) -> Guillotine(x, lani))\nforall x (Smut(x, harrold) and not Guillotine(x, cherida) -> Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Guillotine(x, whit) -> not Smut(x, lani))\nnot Shakedown(harrold) and not Bucket(harrold, whit) -> Bucket(harrold, cherida)\nnot Guillotine(lani, harrold) -> Achaean(harrold)\nforall x (Guillotine(x, lani) -> Bucket(x, harrold))\nFilmable(whit) and Guillotine(whit, lani) -> not Guillotine(lani, whit)\nBucket(harrold, whit) and not Bucket(whit, harrold) -> Bucket(whit, cherida)\n\nBucket(harrold, cherida)\n\nnot Shakedown(harrold) and not Bucket(harrold, whit) -> Bucket(harrold, cherida) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The hayward is nomadic. The hayward does not see the skye. The hayward unreel the kyrstin. The hayward unreel the ricky. The hayward gravel the kyrstin. The skye unreel the hayward. The skye unreel the ricky. The kyrstin is foxy. The kyrstin unreel the skye. The ricky is anorthic. The ricky refer the skye. The ricky refer the kyrstin. If someone unreel the skye then they visit the hayward. If someone unreel the kyrstin and they do not visit the skye then they are foxy. If someone gravel the ricky then they do not see the hayward. If the kyrstin is not nomadic and the kyrstin does not need the ricky then the kyrstin refer the skye. If the hayward does not visit the kyrstin then the kyrstin is retracted. If someone gravel the hayward then they need the kyrstin. If the ricky is notable and the ricky gravel the hayward then the hayward does not visit the ricky. If the kyrstin refer the ricky and the ricky does not need the kyrstin then the ricky refer the skye. The hayward does not need the kyrstin.", "logic": "\nNomadic(hayward)\nnot Unreel(hayward, skye)\nUnreel(hayward, kyrstin)\nUnreel(hayward, ricky)\nGravel(hayward, kyrstin)\nUnreel(skye, hayward)\nUnreel(skye, ricky)\nFoxy(kyrstin)\nUnreel(kyrstin, skye)\nAnorthic(ricky)\nRefer(ricky, skye)\nRefer(ricky, kyrstin)\nforall x (Unreel(x, skye) -> Gravel(x, hayward))\nforall x (Unreel(x, kyrstin) and not Gravel(x, skye) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Gravel(x, ricky) -> not Unreel(x, hayward))\nnot Nomadic(kyrstin) and not Refer(kyrstin, ricky) -> Refer(kyrstin, skye)\nnot Gravel(hayward, kyrstin) -> Retracted(kyrstin)\nforall x (Gravel(x, hayward) -> Refer(x, kyrstin))\nNotable(ricky) and Gravel(ricky, hayward) -> not Gravel(hayward, ricky)\nRefer(kyrstin, ricky) and not Refer(ricky, kyrstin) -> Refer(ricky, skye)\n\nnot Refer(hayward, kyrstin)\n\nforall x (Gravel(x, hayward) -> Refer(x, kyrstin)) <- forall x (Unreel(x, skye) -> Gravel(x, hayward)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The dwight is unreal. The dwight does not see the elwood. The dwight weave the donald. The dwight weave the kati. The dwight campaign the donald. The elwood weave the dwight. The elwood weave the kati. The donald is swish. The donald weave the elwood. The kati is satisfying. The kati islamise the elwood. The kati islamise the donald. If someone weave the elwood then they visit the dwight. If someone weave the donald and they do not visit the elwood then they are swish. If someone campaign the kati then they do not see the dwight. If the donald is not unreal and the donald does not need the kati then the donald islamise the elwood. If the dwight does not visit the donald then the donald is mandatory. If someone campaign the dwight then they need the donald. If the kati is slack and the kati campaign the dwight then the dwight does not visit the kati. If the donald islamise the kati and the kati does not need the donald then the kati islamise the elwood. The elwood islamise the kati.", "logic": "\nUnreal(dwight)\nnot Weave(dwight, elwood)\nWeave(dwight, donald)\nWeave(dwight, kati)\nCampaign(dwight, donald)\nWeave(elwood, dwight)\nWeave(elwood, kati)\nSwish(donald)\nWeave(donald, elwood)\nSatisfying(kati)\nIslamise(kati, elwood)\nIslamise(kati, donald)\nforall x (Weave(x, elwood) -> Campaign(x, dwight))\nforall x (Weave(x, donald) and not Campaign(x, elwood) -> Swish(x))\nforall x (Campaign(x, kati) -> not Weave(x, dwight))\nnot Unreal(donald) and not Islamise(donald, kati) -> Islamise(donald, elwood)\nnot Campaign(dwight, donald) -> Mandatory(donald)\nforall x (Campaign(x, dwight) -> Islamise(x, donald))\nSlack(kati) and Campaign(kati, dwight) -> not Campaign(dwight, kati)\nIslamise(donald, kati) and not Islamise(kati, donald) -> Islamise(kati, elwood)\n\nIslamise(elwood, kati)\n\nIslamise(elwood, kati) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The liora is ludicrous. The liora does not see the mitchel. The liora ingeminate the reeta. The liora ingeminate the dory. The liora baste the reeta. The mitchel ingeminate the liora. The mitchel ingeminate the dory. The reeta is viscous. The reeta ingeminate the mitchel. The dory is rousseauan. The dory yell the mitchel. The dory yell the reeta. If someone ingeminate the mitchel then they visit the liora. If someone ingeminate the reeta and they do not visit the mitchel then they are viscous. If someone baste the dory then they do not see the liora. If the reeta is not ludicrous and the reeta does not need the dory then the reeta yell the mitchel. If the liora does not visit the reeta then the reeta is syphilitic. If someone baste the liora then they need the reeta. If the dory is jacksonian and the dory baste the liora then the liora does not visit the dory. If the reeta yell the dory and the dory does not need the reeta then the dory yell the mitchel. The mitchel does not visit the mitchel.", "logic": "\nLudicrous(liora)\nnot Ingeminate(liora, mitchel)\nIngeminate(liora, reeta)\nIngeminate(liora, dory)\nBaste(liora, reeta)\nIngeminate(mitchel, liora)\nIngeminate(mitchel, dory)\nViscous(reeta)\nIngeminate(reeta, mitchel)\nRousseauan(dory)\nYell(dory, mitchel)\nYell(dory, reeta)\nforall x (Ingeminate(x, mitchel) -> Baste(x, liora))\nforall x (Ingeminate(x, reeta) and not Baste(x, mitchel) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Baste(x, dory) -> not Ingeminate(x, liora))\nnot Ludicrous(reeta) and not Yell(reeta, dory) -> Yell(reeta, mitchel)\nnot Baste(liora, reeta) -> Syphilitic(reeta)\nforall x (Baste(x, liora) -> Yell(x, reeta))\nJacksonian(dory) and Baste(dory, liora) -> not Baste(liora, dory)\nYell(reeta, dory) and not Yell(dory, reeta) -> Yell(dory, mitchel)\n\nnot Baste(mitchel, mitchel)\n\nnot Baste(mitchel, mitchel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The kathye is rectal. The kathye does not see the marcy. The kathye outmatch the jerrine. The kathye outmatch the menard. The kathye crepitate the jerrine. The marcy outmatch the kathye. The marcy outmatch the menard. The jerrine is lyonnaise. The jerrine outmatch the marcy. The menard is odious. The menard enclothe the marcy. The menard enclothe the jerrine. If someone outmatch the marcy then they visit the kathye. If someone outmatch the jerrine and they do not visit the marcy then they are lyonnaise. If someone crepitate the menard then they do not see the kathye. If the jerrine is not rectal and the jerrine does not need the menard then the jerrine enclothe the marcy. If the kathye does not visit the jerrine then the jerrine is immoderate. If someone crepitate the kathye then they need the jerrine. If the menard is immotile and the menard crepitate the kathye then the kathye does not visit the menard. If the jerrine enclothe the menard and the menard does not need the jerrine then the menard enclothe the marcy. The menard enclothe the menard.", "logic": "\nRectal(kathye)\nnot Outmatch(kathye, marcy)\nOutmatch(kathye, jerrine)\nOutmatch(kathye, menard)\nCrepitate(kathye, jerrine)\nOutmatch(marcy, kathye)\nOutmatch(marcy, menard)\nLyonnaise(jerrine)\nOutmatch(jerrine, marcy)\nOdious(menard)\nEnclothe(menard, marcy)\nEnclothe(menard, jerrine)\nforall x (Outmatch(x, marcy) -> Crepitate(x, kathye))\nforall x (Outmatch(x, jerrine) and not Crepitate(x, marcy) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Crepitate(x, menard) -> not Outmatch(x, kathye))\nnot Rectal(jerrine) and not Enclothe(jerrine, menard) -> Enclothe(jerrine, marcy)\nnot Crepitate(kathye, jerrine) -> Immoderate(jerrine)\nforall x (Crepitate(x, kathye) -> Enclothe(x, jerrine))\nImmotile(menard) and Crepitate(menard, kathye) -> not Crepitate(kathye, menard)\nEnclothe(jerrine, menard) and not Enclothe(menard, jerrine) -> Enclothe(menard, marcy)\n\nEnclothe(menard, menard)\n\nEnclothe(menard, menard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1156"} {"premises": "The casandra is carpetbag. The casandra is treacly. The casandra is prepaid. All prepaid, geologic things are treacly. All carpetbag things are treacly. Green things are geologic. If something is carpetbag and geologic then it is prepaid. Green, treacly things are prepaid. Blue things are deliberate. If the casandra is treacly then the casandra is prepaid. All treacly things are deliberate. The casandra is carpetbag.", "logic": "\nCarpetbag(casandra)\nTreacly(casandra)\nPrepaid(casandra)\nforall x (Prepaid(x) and Geologic(x) -> Treacly(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) -> Treacly(x))\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) and Geologic(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Deliberate(x) and Treacly(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nTreacly(casandra) -> Prepaid(casandra)\nforall x (Treacly(x) -> Deliberate(x))\n\nCarpetbag(casandra)\n\ntherefore Carpetbag(casandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "The della is dalmatian. The della is antiseptic. The della is rumanian. All rumanian, pyaemic things are antiseptic. All dalmatian things are antiseptic. Green things are pyaemic. If something is dalmatian and pyaemic then it is rumanian. Green, antiseptic things are rumanian. Blue things are additional. If the della is antiseptic then the della is rumanian. All antiseptic things are additional. The della is not antiseptic.", "logic": "\nDalmatian(della)\nAntiseptic(della)\nRumanian(della)\nforall x (Rumanian(x) and Pyaemic(x) -> Antiseptic(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) -> Antiseptic(x))\nforall x (Additional(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) and Pyaemic(x) -> Rumanian(x))\nforall x (Additional(x) and Antiseptic(x) -> Rumanian(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) -> Additional(x))\nAntiseptic(della) -> Rumanian(della)\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) -> Additional(x))\n\nnot Antiseptic(della)\n\ntherefore Antiseptic(della)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "The starla is tagged. The starla is inhuman. The starla is cyclonic. All cyclonic, upwind things are inhuman. All tagged things are inhuman. Green things are upwind. If something is tagged and upwind then it is cyclonic. Green, inhuman things are cyclonic. Blue things are degage. If the starla is inhuman then the starla is cyclonic. All inhuman things are degage. The starla is degage.", "logic": "\nTagged(starla)\nInhuman(starla)\nCyclonic(starla)\nforall x (Cyclonic(x) and Upwind(x) -> Inhuman(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Inhuman(x))\nforall x (Degage(x) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) and Upwind(x) -> Cyclonic(x))\nforall x (Degage(x) and Inhuman(x) -> Cyclonic(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Degage(x))\nInhuman(starla) -> Cyclonic(starla)\nforall x (Inhuman(x) -> Degage(x))\n\nDegage(starla)\n\nTagged(starla) and forall x (Tagged(x) -> Degage(x)) -> therefore Degage(starla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "The forester is metaphoric. The forester is talky. The forester is sicilian. All sicilian, shortened things are talky. All metaphoric things are talky. Green things are shortened. If something is metaphoric and shortened then it is sicilian. Green, talky things are sicilian. Blue things are markovian. If the forester is talky then the forester is sicilian. All talky things are markovian. The forester is not markovian.", "logic": "\nMetaphoric(forester)\nTalky(forester)\nSicilian(forester)\nforall x (Sicilian(x) and Shortened(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) and Shortened(x) -> Sicilian(x))\nforall x (Markovian(x) and Talky(x) -> Sicilian(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Markovian(x))\nTalky(forester) -> Sicilian(forester)\nforall x (Talky(x) -> Markovian(x))\n\nnot Markovian(forester)\n\nMetaphoric(forester) and forall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Markovian(x)) -> therefore Markovian(forester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "The gideon is provincial. The gideon is utmost. The gideon is remarkable. All remarkable, soigne things are utmost. All provincial things are utmost. Green things are soigne. If something is provincial and soigne then it is remarkable. Green, utmost things are remarkable. Blue things are isomeric. If the gideon is utmost then the gideon is remarkable. All utmost things are isomeric. The gideon is soigne.", "logic": "\nProvincial(gideon)\nUtmost(gideon)\nRemarkable(gideon)\nforall x (Remarkable(x) and Soigne(x) -> Utmost(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Utmost(x))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Soigne(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) and Soigne(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) and Utmost(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Isomeric(x))\nUtmost(gideon) -> Remarkable(gideon)\nforall x (Utmost(x) -> Isomeric(x))\n\nSoigne(gideon)\n\nProvincial(gideon) and forall x (Provincial(x) -> Isomeric(x)) -> therefore Isomeric(gideon) Isomeric(gideon) and forall x (Isomeric(x) -> Soigne(x)) -> therefore Soigne(gideon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "The annmaria is mirthless. The annmaria is remediable. The annmaria is grotesque. All grotesque, glimmery things are remediable. All mirthless things are remediable. Green things are glimmery. If something is mirthless and glimmery then it is grotesque. Green, remediable things are grotesque. Blue things are peanut. If the annmaria is remediable then the annmaria is grotesque. All remediable things are peanut. The annmaria is not glimmery.", "logic": "\nMirthless(annmaria)\nRemediable(annmaria)\nGrotesque(annmaria)\nforall x (Grotesque(x) and Glimmery(x) -> Remediable(x))\nforall x (Mirthless(x) -> Remediable(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Glimmery(x))\nforall x (Mirthless(x) and Glimmery(x) -> Grotesque(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) and Remediable(x) -> Grotesque(x))\nforall x (Mirthless(x) -> Peanut(x))\nRemediable(annmaria) -> Grotesque(annmaria)\nforall x (Remediable(x) -> Peanut(x))\n\nnot Glimmery(annmaria)\n\nMirthless(annmaria) and forall x (Mirthless(x) -> Peanut(x)) -> therefore Peanut(annmaria) Peanut(annmaria) and forall x (Peanut(x) -> Glimmery(x)) -> therefore Glimmery(annmaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "The megan is atrophied. The megan is habitual. The megan is propellant. All propellant, despotical things are habitual. All atrophied things are habitual. Green things are despotical. If something is atrophied and despotical then it is propellant. Green, habitual things are propellant. Blue things are sabbatical. If the megan is habitual then the megan is propellant. All habitual things are sabbatical. The megan does not see the megan.", "logic": "\nAtrophied(megan)\nHabitual(megan)\nPropellant(megan)\nforall x (Propellant(x) and Despotical(x) -> Habitual(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Habitual(x))\nforall x (Sabbatical(x) -> Despotical(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and Despotical(x) -> Propellant(x))\nforall x (Sabbatical(x) and Habitual(x) -> Propellant(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\nHabitual(megan) -> Propellant(megan)\nforall x (Habitual(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\n\nnot Sees(megan, megan)\n\nnot Sees(megan, megan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "The mollie is unsought. The mollie is tactile. The mollie is wanted. All wanted, irenic things are tactile. All unsought things are tactile. Green things are irenic. If something is unsought and irenic then it is wanted. Green, tactile things are wanted. Blue things are mitotic. If the mollie is tactile then the mollie is wanted. All tactile things are mitotic. The mollie visits the mollie.", "logic": "\nUnsought(mollie)\nTactile(mollie)\nWanted(mollie)\nforall x (Wanted(x) and Irenic(x) -> Tactile(x))\nforall x (Unsought(x) -> Tactile(x))\nforall x (Mitotic(x) -> Irenic(x))\nforall x (Unsought(x) and Irenic(x) -> Wanted(x))\nforall x (Mitotic(x) and Tactile(x) -> Wanted(x))\nforall x (Unsought(x) -> Mitotic(x))\nTactile(mollie) -> Wanted(mollie)\nforall x (Tactile(x) -> Mitotic(x))\n\nVisits(mollie, mollie)\n\nVisits(mollie, mollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-615"} {"premises": "Keri is scarlet. Kellyann is wealthy. Hymie is detestable. Hymie is scarlet. Hymie is nationwide. Myrilla is dipped. Myrilla is nationwide. All ploughed people are dipped. All wealthy people are ploughed. Myrilla is dipped.", "logic": "\nScarlet(keri)\nWealthy(kellyann)\nDetestable(hymie)\nScarlet(hymie)\nNationwide(hymie)\nDipped(myrilla)\nNationwide(myrilla)\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Dipped(x))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) -> Ploughed(x))\n\nDipped(myrilla)\n\ntherefore Dipped(myrilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Mose is patronymic. Jessalin is inverse. Maudie is moved. Maudie is patronymic. Maudie is lonesome. Odie is gummed. Odie is lonesome. All totipotent people are gummed. All inverse people are totipotent. Mose is not patronymic.", "logic": "\nPatronymic(mose)\nInverse(jessalin)\nMoved(maudie)\nPatronymic(maudie)\nLonesome(maudie)\nGummed(odie)\nLonesome(odie)\nforall x (Totipotent(x) -> Gummed(x))\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Totipotent(x))\n\nnot Patronymic(mose)\n\ntherefore Patronymic(mose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Vena is cisalpine. Laurette is repressed. Lily is granted. Lily is cisalpine. Lily is ignitable. Alene is axonal. Alene is ignitable. All dashing people are axonal. All repressed people are dashing. Laurette is dashing.", "logic": "\nCisalpine(vena)\nRepressed(laurette)\nGranted(lily)\nCisalpine(lily)\nIgnitable(lily)\nAxonal(alene)\nIgnitable(alene)\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Axonal(x))\nforall x (Repressed(x) -> Dashing(x))\n\nDashing(laurette)\n\nRepressed(laurette) and forall x (Repressed(x) -> Dashing(x)) -> therefore Dashing(laurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Rory is stocky. Cleva is trigonal. Ginny is forty. Ginny is stocky. Ginny is expositive. Chriss is immutable. Chriss is expositive. All rummy people are immutable. All trigonal people are rummy. Cleva is not rummy.", "logic": "\nStocky(rory)\nTrigonal(cleva)\nForty(ginny)\nStocky(ginny)\nExpositive(ginny)\nImmutable(chriss)\nExpositive(chriss)\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> Rummy(x))\n\nnot Rummy(cleva)\n\nTrigonal(cleva) and forall x (Trigonal(x) -> Rummy(x)) -> therefore Rummy(cleva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Ingaborg is fibrinous. Renell is tref. Brant is freakish. Brant is fibrinous. Brant is barbarian. Carlo is cloven. Carlo is barbarian. All frontmost people are cloven. All tref people are frontmost. Renell is cloven.", "logic": "\nFibrinous(ingaborg)\nTref(renell)\nFreakish(brant)\nFibrinous(brant)\nBarbarian(brant)\nCloven(carlo)\nBarbarian(carlo)\nforall x (Frontmost(x) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Tref(x) -> Frontmost(x))\n\nCloven(renell)\n\nTref(renell) and forall x (Tref(x) -> Frontmost(x)) -> therefore Frontmost(renell) Frontmost(renell) and forall x (Frontmost(x) -> Cloven(x)) -> therefore Cloven(renell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Marni is suffering. Harlin is unadvised. Chelsey is unarmoured. Chelsey is suffering. Chelsey is asynergic. Bartie is apophatic. Bartie is asynergic. All pinstriped people are apophatic. All unadvised people are pinstriped. Harlin is not apophatic.", "logic": "\nSuffering(marni)\nUnadvised(harlin)\nUnarmoured(chelsey)\nSuffering(chelsey)\nAsynergic(chelsey)\nApophatic(bartie)\nAsynergic(bartie)\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Unadvised(x) -> Pinstriped(x))\n\nnot Apophatic(harlin)\n\nUnadvised(harlin) and forall x (Unadvised(x) -> Pinstriped(x)) -> therefore Pinstriped(harlin) Pinstriped(harlin) and forall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Apophatic(x)) -> therefore Apophatic(harlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Maurene is unsnarled. Valli is rubbishy. Damian is appetising. Damian is unsnarled. Damian is seasonable. Coreen is capable. Coreen is seasonable. All vedic people are capable. All rubbishy people are vedic. Coreen is not vedic.", "logic": "\nUnsnarled(maurene)\nRubbishy(valli)\nAppetising(damian)\nUnsnarled(damian)\nSeasonable(damian)\nCapable(coreen)\nSeasonable(coreen)\nforall x (Vedic(x) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) -> Vedic(x))\n\nnot Vedic(coreen)\n\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) -> Vedic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Bertine is thoracic. Magda is boolean. Calley is isometric. Calley is thoracic. Calley is untold. Wilfred is scarce. Wilfred is untold. All hemostatic people are scarce. All boolean people are hemostatic. Bertine is hemostatic.", "logic": "\nThoracic(bertine)\nBoolean(magda)\nIsometric(calley)\nThoracic(calley)\nUntold(calley)\nScarce(wilfred)\nUntold(wilfred)\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) -> Scarce(x))\nforall x (Boolean(x) -> Hemostatic(x))\n\nHemostatic(bertine)\n\nforall x (Boolean(x) -> Hemostatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Kenyon is productive. Keeley is ambulatory. Lorilyn is baritone. Lorilyn is productive. Lorilyn is resinlike. Pen is scrupulous. Pen is resinlike. All swell people are scrupulous. All ambulatory people are swell. Lorilyn is not swell.", "logic": "\nProductive(kenyon)\nAmbulatory(keeley)\nBaritone(lorilyn)\nProductive(lorilyn)\nResinlike(lorilyn)\nScrupulous(pen)\nResinlike(pen)\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Ambulatory(x) -> Swell(x))\n\nnot Swell(lorilyn)\n\nforall x (Ambulatory(x) -> Swell(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Sheridan is blazing. Mary is exorbitant. Yard is pennate. Yard is blazing. Yard is congruous. Gennifer is unframed. Gennifer is congruous. All insensible people are unframed. All exorbitant people are insensible. Gennifer is furry.", "logic": "\nBlazing(sheridan)\nExorbitant(mary)\nPennate(yard)\nBlazing(yard)\nCongruous(yard)\nUnframed(gennifer)\nCongruous(gennifer)\nforall x (Insensible(x) -> Unframed(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Insensible(x))\n\nFurry(gennifer)\n\nFurry(gennifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Bernetta is unreactive. Cabrina is homespun. Celestine is undomestic. Celestine is unreactive. Celestine is aglitter. Dina is acuate. Dina is aglitter. All divorced people are acuate. All homespun people are divorced. Bernetta is not undomestic.", "logic": "\nUnreactive(bernetta)\nHomespun(cabrina)\nUndomestic(celestine)\nUnreactive(celestine)\nAglitter(celestine)\nAcuate(dina)\nAglitter(dina)\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Acuate(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) -> Divorced(x))\n\nnot Undomestic(bernetta)\n\nnot Undomestic(bernetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Dyanna is pungent. Velvet is handsome. Birdie is leftish. Birdie is pungent. Birdie is anapestic. Adelice is clammy. Adelice is anapestic. All metatarsal people are clammy. All handsome people are metatarsal. Velvet is leftish.", "logic": "\nPungent(dyanna)\nHandsome(velvet)\nLeftish(birdie)\nPungent(birdie)\nAnapestic(birdie)\nClammy(adelice)\nAnapestic(adelice)\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Handsome(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\n\nLeftish(velvet)\n\nLeftish(velvet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-412"} {"premises": "Allegra is anorectal. Allegra is healthful. Allegra is grumbling. Allegra is boney. Allegra is curable. Julietta is malawian. Julietta is anorectal. Julietta is healthful. Julietta is grumbling. Julietta is boney. Julietta is curable. Julietta is capsulated. If Allegra is boney then Allegra is capsulated. If something is malawian and curable then it is capsulated. If something is anorectal then it is grumbling. If something is capsulated then it is malawian. Quiet things are anorectal. All capsulated things are healthful. Allegra is anorectal.", "logic": "\nAnorectal(allegra)\nHealthful(allegra)\nGrumbling(allegra)\nBoney(allegra)\nCurable(allegra)\nMalawian(julietta)\nAnorectal(julietta)\nHealthful(julietta)\nGrumbling(julietta)\nBoney(julietta)\nCurable(julietta)\nCapsulated(julietta)\nBoney(allegra) -> Capsulated(allegra)\nforall x (Malawian(x) and Curable(x) -> Capsulated(x))\nforall x (Anorectal(x) -> Grumbling(x))\nforall x (Capsulated(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Capsulated(x) -> Healthful(x))\n\nAnorectal(allegra)\n\ntherefore Anorectal(allegra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Katharine is goosy. Katharine is popeyed. Katharine is humble. Katharine is hardy. Katharine is unangry. Jeraldine is loverlike. Jeraldine is goosy. Jeraldine is popeyed. Jeraldine is humble. Jeraldine is hardy. Jeraldine is unangry. Jeraldine is tedious. If Katharine is hardy then Katharine is tedious. If something is loverlike and unangry then it is tedious. If something is goosy then it is humble. If something is tedious then it is loverlike. Quiet things are goosy. All tedious things are popeyed. Jeraldine is not loverlike.", "logic": "\nGoosy(katharine)\nPopeyed(katharine)\nHumble(katharine)\nHardy(katharine)\nUnangry(katharine)\nLoverlike(jeraldine)\nGoosy(jeraldine)\nPopeyed(jeraldine)\nHumble(jeraldine)\nHardy(jeraldine)\nUnangry(jeraldine)\nTedious(jeraldine)\nHardy(katharine) -> Tedious(katharine)\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and Unangry(x) -> Tedious(x))\nforall x (Goosy(x) -> Humble(x))\nforall x (Tedious(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Tedious(x) -> Popeyed(x))\n\nnot Loverlike(jeraldine)\n\ntherefore Loverlike(jeraldine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Jeannine is described. Jeannine is thermionic. Jeannine is brimming. Jeannine is prosthetic. Jeannine is eighth. Chalmers is unbanded. Chalmers is described. Chalmers is thermionic. Chalmers is brimming. Chalmers is prosthetic. Chalmers is eighth. Chalmers is unheated. If Jeannine is prosthetic then Jeannine is unheated. If something is unbanded and eighth then it is unheated. If something is described then it is brimming. If something is unheated then it is unbanded. Quiet things are described. All unheated things are thermionic. Jeannine is unheated.", "logic": "\nDescribed(jeannine)\nThermionic(jeannine)\nBrimming(jeannine)\nProsthetic(jeannine)\nEighth(jeannine)\nUnbanded(chalmers)\nDescribed(chalmers)\nThermionic(chalmers)\nBrimming(chalmers)\nProsthetic(chalmers)\nEighth(chalmers)\nUnheated(chalmers)\nProsthetic(jeannine) -> Unheated(jeannine)\nforall x (Unbanded(x) and Eighth(x) -> Unheated(x))\nforall x (Described(x) -> Brimming(x))\nforall x (Unheated(x) -> Unbanded(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) -> Described(x))\nforall x (Unheated(x) -> Thermionic(x))\n\nUnheated(jeannine)\n\nProsthetic(jeannine) and Prosthetic(jeannine) -> Unheated(jeannine) -> therefore Unheated(jeannine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Elnore is french. Elnore is belated. Elnore is wrecked. Elnore is rescued. Elnore is nutbrown. Marget is meddlesome. Marget is french. Marget is belated. Marget is wrecked. Marget is rescued. Marget is nutbrown. Marget is tasmanian. If Elnore is rescued then Elnore is tasmanian. If something is meddlesome and nutbrown then it is tasmanian. If something is french then it is wrecked. If something is tasmanian then it is meddlesome. Quiet things are french. All tasmanian things are belated. Elnore is not tasmanian.", "logic": "\nFrench(elnore)\nBelated(elnore)\nWrecked(elnore)\nRescued(elnore)\nNutbrown(elnore)\nMeddlesome(marget)\nFrench(marget)\nBelated(marget)\nWrecked(marget)\nRescued(marget)\nNutbrown(marget)\nTasmanian(marget)\nRescued(elnore) -> Tasmanian(elnore)\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) and Nutbrown(x) -> Tasmanian(x))\nforall x (French(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Tasmanian(x) -> Meddlesome(x))\nforall x (Belated(x) -> French(x))\nforall x (Tasmanian(x) -> Belated(x))\n\nnot Tasmanian(elnore)\n\nRescued(elnore) and Rescued(elnore) -> Tasmanian(elnore) -> therefore Tasmanian(elnore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Tresa is protrusile. Tresa is endogenous. Tresa is tortured. Tresa is stupefied. Tresa is aggravated. Len is tolerant. Len is protrusile. Len is endogenous. Len is tortured. Len is stupefied. Len is aggravated. Len is incan. If Tresa is stupefied then Tresa is incan. If something is tolerant and aggravated then it is incan. If something is protrusile then it is tortured. If something is incan then it is tolerant. Quiet things are protrusile. All incan things are endogenous. Tresa is tolerant.", "logic": "\nProtrusile(tresa)\nEndogenous(tresa)\nTortured(tresa)\nStupefied(tresa)\nAggravated(tresa)\nTolerant(len)\nProtrusile(len)\nEndogenous(len)\nTortured(len)\nStupefied(len)\nAggravated(len)\nIncan(len)\nStupefied(tresa) -> Incan(tresa)\nforall x (Tolerant(x) and Aggravated(x) -> Incan(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Endogenous(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) -> Endogenous(x))\n\nTolerant(tresa)\n\nStupefied(tresa) and Stupefied(tresa) -> Incan(tresa) -> therefore Incan(tresa) Incan(tresa) and forall x (Incan(x) -> Tolerant(x)) -> therefore Tolerant(tresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Xena is piebald. Xena is vedic. Xena is nonprofit. Xena is eulogistic. Xena is sublimate. Silvana is plutonic. Silvana is piebald. Silvana is vedic. Silvana is nonprofit. Silvana is eulogistic. Silvana is sublimate. Silvana is monovular. If Xena is eulogistic then Xena is monovular. If something is plutonic and sublimate then it is monovular. If something is piebald then it is nonprofit. If something is monovular then it is plutonic. Quiet things are piebald. All monovular things are vedic. Xena is not plutonic.", "logic": "\nPiebald(xena)\nVedic(xena)\nNonprofit(xena)\nEulogistic(xena)\nSublimate(xena)\nPlutonic(silvana)\nPiebald(silvana)\nVedic(silvana)\nNonprofit(silvana)\nEulogistic(silvana)\nSublimate(silvana)\nMonovular(silvana)\nEulogistic(xena) -> Monovular(xena)\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Sublimate(x) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Piebald(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Monovular(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Vedic(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Monovular(x) -> Vedic(x))\n\nnot Plutonic(xena)\n\nEulogistic(xena) and Eulogistic(xena) -> Monovular(xena) -> therefore Monovular(xena) Monovular(xena) and forall x (Monovular(x) -> Plutonic(x)) -> therefore Plutonic(xena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Marybelle is inevitable. Marybelle is adaptive. Dolora is acquitted. Dolora is adaptive. Dolora is urceolate. Ricki is acquitted. Ricki is extricable. Ricki is unbowed. Ailina is inevitable. Ailina is extricable. All urceolate, inevitable people are unbowed. If someone is urceolate then they are inevitable. Ricki is unbowed.", "logic": "\nInevitable(marybelle)\nAdaptive(marybelle)\nAcquitted(dolora)\nAdaptive(dolora)\nUrceolate(dolora)\nAcquitted(ricki)\nExtricable(ricki)\nUnbowed(ricki)\nInevitable(ailina)\nExtricable(ailina)\nforall x (Urceolate(x) and Inevitable(x) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Urceolate(x) -> Inevitable(x))\n\nUnbowed(ricki)\n\ntherefore Unbowed(ricki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Bishop is basidial. Bishop is unowned. Agnes is prevalent. Agnes is unowned. Agnes is thirdhand. Patel is prevalent. Patel is katari. Patel is ungenerous. Madelina is basidial. Madelina is katari. All thirdhand, basidial people are ungenerous. If someone is thirdhand then they are basidial. Bishop is not unowned.", "logic": "\nBasidial(bishop)\nUnowned(bishop)\nPrevalent(agnes)\nUnowned(agnes)\nThirdhand(agnes)\nPrevalent(patel)\nKatari(patel)\nUngenerous(patel)\nBasidial(madelina)\nKatari(madelina)\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) and Basidial(x) -> Ungenerous(x))\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) -> Basidial(x))\n\nnot Unowned(bishop)\n\ntherefore Unowned(bishop)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Gerrie is actual. Gerrie is gingery. Lorne is stomatal. Lorne is gingery. Lorne is infective. Gerrard is stomatal. Gerrard is grating. Gerrard is catarrhine. Alanah is actual. Alanah is grating. All infective, actual people are catarrhine. If someone is infective then they are actual. Lorne is actual.", "logic": "\nActual(gerrie)\nGingery(gerrie)\nStomatal(lorne)\nGingery(lorne)\nInfective(lorne)\nStomatal(gerrard)\nGrating(gerrard)\nCatarrhine(gerrard)\nActual(alanah)\nGrating(alanah)\nforall x (Infective(x) and Actual(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Infective(x) -> Actual(x))\n\nActual(lorne)\n\nInfective(lorne) and forall x (Infective(x) -> Actual(x)) -> therefore Actual(lorne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Cynthie is eulogistic. Cynthie is vocative. Timmy is unheeded. Timmy is vocative. Timmy is unwise. Emil is unheeded. Emil is iraqi. Emil is notifiable. Rhona is eulogistic. Rhona is iraqi. All unwise, eulogistic people are notifiable. If someone is unwise then they are eulogistic. Timmy is not eulogistic.", "logic": "\nEulogistic(cynthie)\nVocative(cynthie)\nUnheeded(timmy)\nVocative(timmy)\nUnwise(timmy)\nUnheeded(emil)\nIraqi(emil)\nNotifiable(emil)\nEulogistic(rhona)\nIraqi(rhona)\nforall x (Unwise(x) and Eulogistic(x) -> Notifiable(x))\nforall x (Unwise(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\n\nnot Eulogistic(timmy)\n\nUnwise(timmy) and forall x (Unwise(x) -> Eulogistic(x)) -> therefore Eulogistic(timmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Nico is siberian. Nico is taiwanese. Christian is culpable. Christian is taiwanese. Christian is incisive. Francoise is culpable. Francoise is bullocky. Francoise is relentless. Kissie is siberian. Kissie is bullocky. All incisive, siberian people are relentless. If someone is incisive then they are siberian. Christian is relentless.", "logic": "\nSiberian(nico)\nTaiwanese(nico)\nCulpable(christian)\nTaiwanese(christian)\nIncisive(christian)\nCulpable(francoise)\nBullocky(francoise)\nRelentless(francoise)\nSiberian(kissie)\nBullocky(kissie)\nforall x (Incisive(x) and Siberian(x) -> Relentless(x))\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Siberian(x))\n\nRelentless(christian)\n\nIncisive(christian) and forall x (Incisive(x) -> Siberian(x)) -> therefore Siberian(christian) Incisive(christian) and Siberian(christian) and forall x (Incisive(x) and Siberian(x) -> Relentless(x)) -> therefore Relentless(christian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Ari is innumerous. Ari is durable. Madelena is staminate. Madelena is durable. Madelena is briery. Ninetta is staminate. Ninetta is inflowing. Ninetta is piecemeal. Matthieu is innumerous. Matthieu is inflowing. All briery, innumerous people are piecemeal. If someone is briery then they are innumerous. Madelena is not piecemeal.", "logic": "\nInnumerous(ari)\nDurable(ari)\nStaminate(madelena)\nDurable(madelena)\nBriery(madelena)\nStaminate(ninetta)\nInflowing(ninetta)\nPiecemeal(ninetta)\nInnumerous(matthieu)\nInflowing(matthieu)\nforall x (Briery(x) and Innumerous(x) -> Piecemeal(x))\nforall x (Briery(x) -> Innumerous(x))\n\nnot Piecemeal(madelena)\n\nBriery(madelena) and forall x (Briery(x) -> Innumerous(x)) -> therefore Innumerous(madelena) Briery(madelena) and Innumerous(madelena) and forall x (Briery(x) and Innumerous(x) -> Piecemeal(x)) -> therefore Piecemeal(madelena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Modesta is petrifying. Modesta is flamboyant. Lory is spotless. Lory is flamboyant. Lory is tricuspid. Clari is spotless. Clari is precooled. Clari is masculine. Haley is petrifying. Haley is precooled. All tricuspid, petrifying people are masculine. If someone is tricuspid then they are petrifying. Modesta is not masculine.", "logic": "\nPetrifying(modesta)\nFlamboyant(modesta)\nSpotless(lory)\nFlamboyant(lory)\nTricuspid(lory)\nSpotless(clari)\nPrecooled(clari)\nMasculine(clari)\nPetrifying(haley)\nPrecooled(haley)\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) and Petrifying(x) -> Masculine(x))\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) -> Petrifying(x))\n\nnot Masculine(modesta)\n\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) and Petrifying(x) -> Masculine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Sigmund is nagging. Sigmund is advective. Micah is captious. Micah is advective. Micah is manual. Gerold is captious. Gerold is veiled. Gerold is glottal. Kitty is nagging. Kitty is veiled. All manual, nagging people are glottal. If someone is manual then they are nagging. Kitty is glottal.", "logic": "\nNagging(sigmund)\nAdvective(sigmund)\nCaptious(micah)\nAdvective(micah)\nManual(micah)\nCaptious(gerold)\nVeiled(gerold)\nGlottal(gerold)\nNagging(kitty)\nVeiled(kitty)\nforall x (Manual(x) and Nagging(x) -> Glottal(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Nagging(x))\n\nGlottal(kitty)\n\nforall x (Manual(x) and Nagging(x) -> Glottal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Larisa is windless. Larisa is tabby. Grayce is incurious. Grayce is tabby. Grayce is trifid. Gunvor is incurious. Gunvor is spurned. Gunvor is expectable. Hilton is windless. Hilton is spurned. All trifid, windless people are expectable. If someone is trifid then they are windless. Gunvor is not windless.", "logic": "\nWindless(larisa)\nTabby(larisa)\nIncurious(grayce)\nTabby(grayce)\nTrifid(grayce)\nIncurious(gunvor)\nSpurned(gunvor)\nExpectable(gunvor)\nWindless(hilton)\nSpurned(hilton)\nforall x (Trifid(x) and Windless(x) -> Expectable(x))\nforall x (Trifid(x) -> Windless(x))\n\nnot Windless(gunvor)\n\nforall x (Trifid(x) -> Windless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Trace is frangible. Trace is twilled. Keeley is wilful. Keeley is twilled. Keeley is totaled. Konstance is wilful. Konstance is adagio. Konstance is ischemic. Viviene is frangible. Viviene is adagio. All totaled, frangible people are ischemic. If someone is totaled then they are frangible. Viviene is twilled.", "logic": "\nFrangible(trace)\nTwilled(trace)\nWilful(keeley)\nTwilled(keeley)\nTotaled(keeley)\nWilful(konstance)\nAdagio(konstance)\nIschemic(konstance)\nFrangible(viviene)\nAdagio(viviene)\nforall x (Totaled(x) and Frangible(x) -> Ischemic(x))\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Frangible(x))\n\nTwilled(viviene)\n\nTwilled(viviene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Vivyanne is jaundiced. Vivyanne is unnerving. Carley is frontal. Carley is unnerving. Carley is luxuriant. Garret is frontal. Garret is polished. Garret is firsthand. Anselm is jaundiced. Anselm is polished. All luxuriant, jaundiced people are firsthand. If someone is luxuriant then they are jaundiced. Vivyanne is not white.", "logic": "\nJaundiced(vivyanne)\nUnnerving(vivyanne)\nFrontal(carley)\nUnnerving(carley)\nLuxuriant(carley)\nFrontal(garret)\nPolished(garret)\nFirsthand(garret)\nJaundiced(anselm)\nPolished(anselm)\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) and Jaundiced(x) -> Firsthand(x))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Jaundiced(x))\n\nnot White(vivyanne)\n\nnot White(vivyanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Ulrich is summery. Ulrich is armored. Mitchel is intruding. Mitchel is armored. Mitchel is daunted. Carena is intruding. Carena is smoggy. Carena is sepulchral. Clarey is summery. Clarey is smoggy. All daunted, summery people are sepulchral. If someone is daunted then they are summery. Carena is armored.", "logic": "\nSummery(ulrich)\nArmored(ulrich)\nIntruding(mitchel)\nArmored(mitchel)\nDaunted(mitchel)\nIntruding(carena)\nSmoggy(carena)\nSepulchral(carena)\nSummery(clarey)\nSmoggy(clarey)\nforall x (Daunted(x) and Summery(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nforall x (Daunted(x) -> Summery(x))\n\nArmored(carena)\n\nArmored(carena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "The georgette indurate the loralee. The georgette is resilient. The georgette is reposeful. The georgette uniformize the loralee. The loralee is forgiving. The loralee uniformize the georgette. The loralee overact the georgette. If the loralee overact the georgette then the loralee indurate the georgette. If someone indurate the georgette then they eat the loralee. If someone uniformize the georgette and the georgette is satyric then the georgette uniformize the loralee. The georgette indurate the loralee.", "logic": "\nIndurate(georgette, loralee)\nResilient(georgette)\nReposeful(georgette)\nUniformize(georgette, loralee)\nForgiving(loralee)\nUniformize(loralee, georgette)\nOveract(loralee, georgette)\nOveract(loralee, georgette) -> Indurate(loralee, georgette)\nforall x (Indurate(x, georgette) -> Indurate(x, loralee))\nforall x (Uniformize(x, georgette) and Satyric(georgette) -> Uniformize(georgette, loralee))\n\nIndurate(georgette, loralee)\n\ntherefore Indurate(georgette, loralee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The adolfo ionize the lauri. The adolfo is untoothed. The adolfo is dusky. The adolfo henna the lauri. The lauri is logical. The lauri henna the adolfo. The lauri blate the adolfo. If the lauri blate the adolfo then the lauri ionize the adolfo. If someone ionize the adolfo then they eat the lauri. If someone henna the adolfo and the adolfo is humped then the adolfo henna the lauri. The lauri is not logical.", "logic": "\nIonize(adolfo, lauri)\nUntoothed(adolfo)\nDusky(adolfo)\nHenna(adolfo, lauri)\nLogical(lauri)\nHenna(lauri, adolfo)\nBlate(lauri, adolfo)\nBlate(lauri, adolfo) -> Ionize(lauri, adolfo)\nforall x (Ionize(x, adolfo) -> Ionize(x, lauri))\nforall x (Henna(x, adolfo) and Humped(adolfo) -> Henna(adolfo, lauri))\n\nnot Logical(lauri)\n\ntherefore Logical(lauri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The alfie pride the atalanta. The alfie is absent. The alfie is rustic. The alfie decolorize the atalanta. The atalanta is unlocked. The atalanta decolorize the alfie. The atalanta soften the alfie. If the atalanta soften the alfie then the atalanta pride the alfie. If someone pride the alfie then they eat the atalanta. If someone decolorize the alfie and the alfie is endogenous then the alfie decolorize the atalanta. The atalanta pride the alfie.", "logic": "\nPride(alfie, atalanta)\nAbsent(alfie)\nRustic(alfie)\nDecolorize(alfie, atalanta)\nUnlocked(atalanta)\nDecolorize(atalanta, alfie)\nSoften(atalanta, alfie)\nSoften(atalanta, alfie) -> Pride(atalanta, alfie)\nforall x (Pride(x, alfie) -> Pride(x, atalanta))\nforall x (Decolorize(x, alfie) and Endogenous(alfie) -> Decolorize(alfie, atalanta))\n\nPride(atalanta, alfie)\n\nSoften(atalanta, alfie) and Soften(atalanta, alfie) -> Pride(atalanta, alfie) -> therefore Pride(atalanta, alfie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The ninette degust the carolann. The ninette is infantile. The ninette is sceptred. The ninette wank the carolann. The carolann is misshapen. The carolann wank the ninette. The carolann frustrate the ninette. If the carolann frustrate the ninette then the carolann degust the ninette. If someone degust the ninette then they eat the carolann. If someone wank the ninette and the ninette is fleet then the ninette wank the carolann. The carolann does not eat the ninette.", "logic": "\nDegust(ninette, carolann)\nInfantile(ninette)\nSceptred(ninette)\nWank(ninette, carolann)\nMisshapen(carolann)\nWank(carolann, ninette)\nFrustrate(carolann, ninette)\nFrustrate(carolann, ninette) -> Degust(carolann, ninette)\nforall x (Degust(x, ninette) -> Degust(x, carolann))\nforall x (Wank(x, ninette) and Fleet(ninette) -> Wank(ninette, carolann))\n\nnot Degust(carolann, ninette)\n\nFrustrate(carolann, ninette) and Frustrate(carolann, ninette) -> Degust(carolann, ninette) -> therefore Degust(carolann, ninette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The matthieu brine the oscar. The matthieu is unique. The matthieu is tubercular. The matthieu hoist the oscar. The oscar is leafless. The oscar hoist the matthieu. The oscar enjoin the matthieu. If the oscar enjoin the matthieu then the oscar brine the matthieu. If someone brine the matthieu then they eat the oscar. If someone hoist the matthieu and the matthieu is saturnine then the matthieu hoist the oscar. The oscar brine the oscar.", "logic": "\nBrine(matthieu, oscar)\nUnique(matthieu)\nTubercular(matthieu)\nHoist(matthieu, oscar)\nLeafless(oscar)\nHoist(oscar, matthieu)\nEnjoin(oscar, matthieu)\nEnjoin(oscar, matthieu) -> Brine(oscar, matthieu)\nforall x (Brine(x, matthieu) -> Brine(x, oscar))\nforall x (Hoist(x, matthieu) and Saturnine(matthieu) -> Hoist(matthieu, oscar))\n\nBrine(oscar, oscar)\n\nEnjoin(oscar, matthieu) and Enjoin(oscar, matthieu) -> Brine(oscar, matthieu) -> therefore Brine(oscar, matthieu) Brine(oscar, matthieu) and forall x (Brine(x, matthieu) -> Brine(x, oscar)) -> therefore Brine(oscar, oscar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The wilma bungle the olimpia. The wilma is exploited. The wilma is dalmatian. The wilma embrangle the olimpia. The olimpia is afebrile. The olimpia embrangle the wilma. The olimpia read the wilma. If the olimpia read the wilma then the olimpia bungle the wilma. If someone bungle the wilma then they eat the olimpia. If someone embrangle the wilma and the wilma is faucal then the wilma embrangle the olimpia. The olimpia does not eat the olimpia.", "logic": "\nBungle(wilma, olimpia)\nExploited(wilma)\nDalmatian(wilma)\nEmbrangle(wilma, olimpia)\nAfebrile(olimpia)\nEmbrangle(olimpia, wilma)\nRead(olimpia, wilma)\nRead(olimpia, wilma) -> Bungle(olimpia, wilma)\nforall x (Bungle(x, wilma) -> Bungle(x, olimpia))\nforall x (Embrangle(x, wilma) and Faucal(wilma) -> Embrangle(wilma, olimpia))\n\nnot Bungle(olimpia, olimpia)\n\nRead(olimpia, wilma) and Read(olimpia, wilma) -> Bungle(olimpia, wilma) -> therefore Bungle(olimpia, wilma) Bungle(olimpia, wilma) and forall x (Bungle(x, wilma) -> Bungle(x, olimpia)) -> therefore Bungle(olimpia, olimpia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The cammie seep the neale. The cammie is pure. The cammie is sublunar. The cammie exuberate the neale. The neale is incessant. The neale exuberate the cammie. The neale stalinise the cammie. If the neale stalinise the cammie then the neale seep the cammie. If someone seep the cammie then they eat the neale. If someone exuberate the cammie and the cammie is throwaway then the cammie exuberate the neale. The neale is not blue.", "logic": "\nSeep(cammie, neale)\nPure(cammie)\nSublunar(cammie)\nExuberate(cammie, neale)\nIncessant(neale)\nExuberate(neale, cammie)\nStalinise(neale, cammie)\nStalinise(neale, cammie) -> Seep(neale, cammie)\nforall x (Seep(x, cammie) -> Seep(x, neale))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, cammie) and Throwaway(cammie) -> Exuberate(cammie, neale))\n\nnot Blue(neale)\n\nnot Blue(neale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The gabriele postdate the king. The gabriele is obliged. The gabriele is vacant. The gabriele cohere the king. The king is conjoint. The king cohere the gabriele. The king goffer the gabriele. If the king goffer the gabriele then the king postdate the gabriele. If someone postdate the gabriele then they eat the king. If someone cohere the gabriele and the gabriele is releasing then the gabriele cohere the king. The gabriele goffer the gabriele.", "logic": "\nPostdate(gabriele, king)\nObliged(gabriele)\nVacant(gabriele)\nCohere(gabriele, king)\nConjoint(king)\nCohere(king, gabriele)\nGoffer(king, gabriele)\nGoffer(king, gabriele) -> Postdate(king, gabriele)\nforall x (Postdate(x, gabriele) -> Postdate(x, king))\nforall x (Cohere(x, gabriele) and Releasing(gabriele) -> Cohere(gabriele, king))\n\nGoffer(gabriele, gabriele)\n\nGoffer(gabriele, gabriele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The zorah outstrip the gilligan. The zorah is gloveless. The zorah is propulsive. The zorah fancify the gilligan. The gilligan is wholesome. The gilligan fancify the zorah. The gilligan depolarize the zorah. If the gilligan depolarize the zorah then the gilligan outstrip the zorah. If someone outstrip the zorah then they eat the gilligan. If someone fancify the zorah and the zorah is omnivorous then the zorah fancify the gilligan. The gilligan is not gloveless.", "logic": "\nOutstrip(zorah, gilligan)\nGloveless(zorah)\nPropulsive(zorah)\nFancify(zorah, gilligan)\nWholesome(gilligan)\nFancify(gilligan, zorah)\nDepolarize(gilligan, zorah)\nDepolarize(gilligan, zorah) -> Outstrip(gilligan, zorah)\nforall x (Outstrip(x, zorah) -> Outstrip(x, gilligan))\nforall x (Fancify(x, zorah) and Omnivorous(zorah) -> Fancify(zorah, gilligan))\n\nnot Gloveless(gilligan)\n\nnot Gloveless(gilligan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The manya troop the jonah. The manya is crustlike. The manya is august. The manya cathect the jonah. The jonah is emarginate. The jonah cathect the manya. The jonah snarl the manya. If the jonah snarl the manya then the jonah troop the manya. If someone troop the manya then they eat the jonah. If someone cathect the manya and the manya is antitank then the manya cathect the jonah. The jonah is antitank.", "logic": "\nTroop(manya, jonah)\nCrustlike(manya)\nAugust(manya)\nCathect(manya, jonah)\nEmarginate(jonah)\nCathect(jonah, manya)\nSnarl(jonah, manya)\nSnarl(jonah, manya) -> Troop(jonah, manya)\nforall x (Troop(x, manya) -> Troop(x, jonah))\nforall x (Cathect(x, manya) and Antitank(manya) -> Cathect(manya, jonah))\n\nAntitank(jonah)\n\nAntitank(jonah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The tobi entomb the claudelle. The tobi is achenial. The tobi is violated. The tobi bench the claudelle. The claudelle is anopheline. The claudelle bench the tobi. The claudelle couch the tobi. If the claudelle couch the tobi then the claudelle entomb the tobi. If someone entomb the tobi then they eat the claudelle. If someone bench the tobi and the tobi is foetal then the tobi bench the claudelle. The claudelle does not need the claudelle.", "logic": "\nEntomb(tobi, claudelle)\nAchenial(tobi)\nViolated(tobi)\nBench(tobi, claudelle)\nAnopheline(claudelle)\nBench(claudelle, tobi)\nCouch(claudelle, tobi)\nCouch(claudelle, tobi) -> Entomb(claudelle, tobi)\nforall x (Entomb(x, tobi) -> Entomb(x, claudelle))\nforall x (Bench(x, tobi) and Foetal(tobi) -> Bench(tobi, claudelle))\n\nnot Bench(claudelle, claudelle)\n\nnot Bench(claudelle, claudelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "The godiva revoke the ebeneser. The godiva is footloose. The godiva is scant. The godiva resettle the ebeneser. The ebeneser is unranked. The ebeneser resettle the godiva. The ebeneser buss the godiva. If the ebeneser buss the godiva then the ebeneser revoke the godiva. If someone revoke the godiva then they eat the ebeneser. If someone resettle the godiva and the godiva is pertinent then the godiva resettle the ebeneser. The godiva is blue.", "logic": "\nRevoke(godiva, ebeneser)\nFootloose(godiva)\nScant(godiva)\nResettle(godiva, ebeneser)\nUnranked(ebeneser)\nResettle(ebeneser, godiva)\nBuss(ebeneser, godiva)\nBuss(ebeneser, godiva) -> Revoke(ebeneser, godiva)\nforall x (Revoke(x, godiva) -> Revoke(x, ebeneser))\nforall x (Resettle(x, godiva) and Pertinent(godiva) -> Resettle(godiva, ebeneser))\n\nBlue(godiva)\n\nBlue(godiva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1232"} {"premises": "Drea is not yellow. Drea is unsolvable. Drea is winking. Drea is coplanar. Drea is cutthroat. Marena is winking. Marena is cutthroat. Marena is bereft. Joanne is cutthroat. Charline is unsolvable. Young, winking people are yellow. Blue people are unsolvable. Joanne is cutthroat.", "logic": "\nnot Yellow(drea)\nUnsolvable(drea)\nWinking(drea)\nCoplanar(drea)\nCutthroat(drea)\nWinking(marena)\nCutthroat(marena)\nBereft(marena)\nCutthroat(joanne)\nUnsolvable(charline)\nforall x (Bereft(x) and Winking(x) -> Yellow(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) -> Unsolvable(x))\n\nCutthroat(joanne)\n\ntherefore Cutthroat(joanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Thacher is not requisite. Thacher is glutinous. Thacher is unbiassed. Thacher is drunken. Thacher is satisfying. Rina is unbiassed. Rina is satisfying. Rina is tops. Jeanette is satisfying. Rudolf is glutinous. Young, unbiassed people are requisite. Blue people are glutinous. Rina is not unbiassed.", "logic": "\nnot Requisite(thacher)\nGlutinous(thacher)\nUnbiassed(thacher)\nDrunken(thacher)\nSatisfying(thacher)\nUnbiassed(rina)\nSatisfying(rina)\nTops(rina)\nSatisfying(jeanette)\nGlutinous(rudolf)\nforall x (Tops(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) -> Glutinous(x))\n\nnot Unbiassed(rina)\n\ntherefore Unbiassed(rina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Rici is not unhealthy. Rici is classic. Rici is danish. Rici is perversive. Rici is corrigible. Wiatt is danish. Wiatt is corrigible. Wiatt is oblate. Gennie is corrigible. Alain is classic. Young, danish people are unhealthy. Blue people are classic. Wiatt is unhealthy.", "logic": "\nnot Unhealthy(rici)\nClassic(rici)\nDanish(rici)\nPerversive(rici)\nCorrigible(rici)\nDanish(wiatt)\nCorrigible(wiatt)\nOblate(wiatt)\nCorrigible(gennie)\nClassic(alain)\nforall x (Oblate(x) and Danish(x) -> Unhealthy(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Classic(x))\n\nUnhealthy(wiatt)\n\nOblate(wiatt) and Danish(wiatt) and forall x (Oblate(x) and Danish(x) -> Unhealthy(x)) -> therefore Unhealthy(wiatt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Moe is not oratorical. Moe is grueling. Moe is projecting. Moe is unaffixed. Moe is oblong. Reese is projecting. Reese is oblong. Reese is expiratory. Bing is oblong. Oswald is grueling. Young, projecting people are oratorical. Blue people are grueling. Reese is not oratorical.", "logic": "\nnot Oratorical(moe)\nGrueling(moe)\nProjecting(moe)\nUnaffixed(moe)\nOblong(moe)\nProjecting(reese)\nOblong(reese)\nExpiratory(reese)\nOblong(bing)\nGrueling(oswald)\nforall x (Expiratory(x) and Projecting(x) -> Oratorical(x))\nforall x (Oratorical(x) -> Grueling(x))\n\nnot Oratorical(reese)\n\nExpiratory(reese) and Projecting(reese) and forall x (Expiratory(x) and Projecting(x) -> Oratorical(x)) -> therefore Oratorical(reese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Karlene is not waterless. Karlene is underarm. Karlene is sarcoid. Karlene is lxiii. Karlene is pustulate. Rhodia is sarcoid. Rhodia is pustulate. Rhodia is halal. Clari is pustulate. Greta is underarm. Young, sarcoid people are waterless. Blue people are underarm. Rhodia is underarm.", "logic": "\nnot Waterless(karlene)\nUnderarm(karlene)\nSarcoid(karlene)\nLxiii(karlene)\nPustulate(karlene)\nSarcoid(rhodia)\nPustulate(rhodia)\nHalal(rhodia)\nPustulate(clari)\nUnderarm(greta)\nforall x (Halal(x) and Sarcoid(x) -> Waterless(x))\nforall x (Waterless(x) -> Underarm(x))\n\nUnderarm(rhodia)\n\nHalal(rhodia) and Sarcoid(rhodia) and forall x (Halal(x) and Sarcoid(x) -> Waterless(x)) -> therefore Waterless(rhodia) Waterless(rhodia) and forall x (Waterless(x) -> Underarm(x)) -> therefore Underarm(rhodia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Clary is not rapacious. Clary is light. Clary is genoese. Clary is draggled. Clary is sassy. Dasya is genoese. Dasya is sassy. Dasya is grumpy. Tanney is sassy. Mariel is light. Young, genoese people are rapacious. Blue people are light. Dasya is not light.", "logic": "\nnot Rapacious(clary)\nLight(clary)\nGenoese(clary)\nDraggled(clary)\nSassy(clary)\nGenoese(dasya)\nSassy(dasya)\nGrumpy(dasya)\nSassy(tanney)\nLight(mariel)\nforall x (Grumpy(x) and Genoese(x) -> Rapacious(x))\nforall x (Rapacious(x) -> Light(x))\n\nnot Light(dasya)\n\nGrumpy(dasya) and Genoese(dasya) and forall x (Grumpy(x) and Genoese(x) -> Rapacious(x)) -> therefore Rapacious(dasya) Rapacious(dasya) and forall x (Rapacious(x) -> Light(x)) -> therefore Light(dasya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Thaxter is not emarginate. Thaxter is prepacked. Thaxter is wearisome. Thaxter is steadied. Thaxter is astringent. Sigmund is wearisome. Sigmund is astringent. Sigmund is satanic. Lorene is astringent. Anthony is prepacked. Young, wearisome people are emarginate. Blue people are prepacked. Anthony is not emarginate.", "logic": "\nnot Emarginate(thaxter)\nPrepacked(thaxter)\nWearisome(thaxter)\nSteadied(thaxter)\nAstringent(thaxter)\nWearisome(sigmund)\nAstringent(sigmund)\nSatanic(sigmund)\nAstringent(lorene)\nPrepacked(anthony)\nforall x (Satanic(x) and Wearisome(x) -> Emarginate(x))\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Prepacked(x))\n\nnot Emarginate(anthony)\n\nforall x (Satanic(x) and Wearisome(x) -> Emarginate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Karissa is not amylaceous. Karissa is jungly. Karissa is reflex. Karissa is flukey. Karissa is nonionized. Marve is reflex. Marve is nonionized. Marve is obstinate. Cortese is nonionized. Kaleb is jungly. Young, reflex people are amylaceous. Blue people are jungly. Cortese is jungly.", "logic": "\nnot Amylaceous(karissa)\nJungly(karissa)\nReflex(karissa)\nFlukey(karissa)\nNonionized(karissa)\nReflex(marve)\nNonionized(marve)\nObstinate(marve)\nNonionized(cortese)\nJungly(kaleb)\nforall x (Obstinate(x) and Reflex(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) -> Jungly(x))\n\nJungly(cortese)\n\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) -> Jungly(x)) <- forall x (Obstinate(x) and Reflex(x) -> Amylaceous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Nikita is not grapelike. Nikita is apical. Nikita is spiffy. Nikita is distant. Nikita is wholesome. Masha is spiffy. Masha is wholesome. Masha is semiotic. Tomlin is wholesome. Tristan is apical. Young, spiffy people are grapelike. Blue people are apical. Tomlin is not grapelike.", "logic": "\nnot Grapelike(nikita)\nApical(nikita)\nSpiffy(nikita)\nDistant(nikita)\nWholesome(nikita)\nSpiffy(masha)\nWholesome(masha)\nSemiotic(masha)\nWholesome(tomlin)\nApical(tristan)\nforall x (Semiotic(x) and Spiffy(x) -> Grapelike(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) -> Apical(x))\n\nnot Grapelike(tomlin)\n\nforall x (Semiotic(x) and Spiffy(x) -> Grapelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Menard is not heedful. Menard is remedial. Menard is judaic. Menard is artful. Menard is woolen. Iormina is judaic. Iormina is woolen. Iormina is northern. Velma is woolen. Mickey is remedial. Young, judaic people are heedful. Blue people are remedial. Mickey is woolen.", "logic": "\nnot Heedful(menard)\nRemedial(menard)\nJudaic(menard)\nArtful(menard)\nWoolen(menard)\nJudaic(iormina)\nWoolen(iormina)\nNorthern(iormina)\nWoolen(velma)\nRemedial(mickey)\nforall x (Northern(x) and Judaic(x) -> Heedful(x))\nforall x (Heedful(x) -> Remedial(x))\n\nWoolen(mickey)\n\nWoolen(mickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Benetta is not rheumy. Benetta is sloppy. Benetta is cussed. Benetta is lasting. Benetta is submerged. Britt is cussed. Britt is submerged. Britt is arteriolar. Ciara is submerged. Carl is sloppy. Young, cussed people are rheumy. Blue people are sloppy. Britt is not lasting.", "logic": "\nnot Rheumy(benetta)\nSloppy(benetta)\nCussed(benetta)\nLasting(benetta)\nSubmerged(benetta)\nCussed(britt)\nSubmerged(britt)\nArteriolar(britt)\nSubmerged(ciara)\nSloppy(carl)\nforall x (Arteriolar(x) and Cussed(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Rheumy(x) -> Sloppy(x))\n\nnot Lasting(britt)\n\nnot Lasting(britt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "Harvey is not holy. Harvey is blinded. Harvey is convolute. Harvey is punishing. Harvey is bodily. Karlotta is convolute. Karlotta is bodily. Karlotta is blanched. Henrieta is bodily. Oralla is blinded. Young, convolute people are holy. Blue people are blinded. Oralla is convolute.", "logic": "\nnot Holy(harvey)\nBlinded(harvey)\nConvolute(harvey)\nPunishing(harvey)\nBodily(harvey)\nConvolute(karlotta)\nBodily(karlotta)\nBlanched(karlotta)\nBodily(henrieta)\nBlinded(oralla)\nforall x (Blanched(x) and Convolute(x) -> Holy(x))\nforall x (Holy(x) -> Blinded(x))\n\nConvolute(oralla)\n\nConvolute(oralla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-622"} {"premises": "The nelly does not eat the idelle. The nelly is not panoplied. The nelly is untucked. The nelly is stifled. The nelly is becoming. The nelly is helical. The nelly ware the idelle. The nelly bereave the idelle. The idelle reprove the nelly. The idelle is becoming. The idelle is helical. The idelle bereave the nelly. If someone ware the idelle then they are becoming. If someone is stifled then they visit the idelle. If someone is stifled then they do not eat the nelly. If someone is becoming and they like the idelle then the idelle bereave the nelly. If someone reprove the nelly and the nelly ware the idelle then they are untucked. If someone ware the nelly and the nelly is not untucked then they are helical. If someone ware the idelle and they are helical then the idelle ware the nelly. If someone ware the nelly then they are panoplied. The nelly is untucked.", "logic": "\nnot Reprove(nelly, idelle)\nnot Panoplied(nelly)\nUntucked(nelly)\nStifled(nelly)\nBecoming(nelly)\nHelical(nelly)\nWare(nelly, idelle)\nBereave(nelly, idelle)\nReprove(idelle, nelly)\nBecoming(idelle)\nHelical(idelle)\nBereave(idelle, nelly)\nforall x (Ware(x, idelle) -> Becoming(x))\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Bereave(x, idelle))\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> not Reprove(x, nelly))\nforall x (Becoming(x) and Ware(x, idelle) -> Bereave(idelle, nelly))\nforall x (Reprove(x, nelly) and Ware(nelly, idelle) -> Untucked(x))\nforall x (Ware(x, nelly) and not Untucked(nelly) -> Helical(x))\nforall x (Ware(x, idelle) and Helical(x) -> Ware(idelle, nelly))\nforall x (Ware(x, nelly) -> Panoplied(x))\n\nUntucked(nelly)\n\ntherefore Untucked(nelly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The jessa does not eat the bruno. The jessa is not opencast. The jessa is overt. The jessa is linnaean. The jessa is negroid. The jessa is uvular. The jessa marbleize the bruno. The jessa baptize the bruno. The bruno estivate the jessa. The bruno is negroid. The bruno is uvular. The bruno baptize the jessa. If someone marbleize the bruno then they are negroid. If someone is linnaean then they visit the bruno. If someone is linnaean then they do not eat the jessa. If someone is negroid and they like the bruno then the bruno baptize the jessa. If someone estivate the jessa and the jessa marbleize the bruno then they are overt. If someone marbleize the jessa and the jessa is not overt then they are uvular. If someone marbleize the bruno and they are uvular then the bruno marbleize the jessa. If someone marbleize the jessa then they are opencast. The jessa is opencast.", "logic": "\nnot Estivate(jessa, bruno)\nnot Opencast(jessa)\nOvert(jessa)\nLinnaean(jessa)\nNegroid(jessa)\nUvular(jessa)\nMarbleize(jessa, bruno)\nBaptize(jessa, bruno)\nEstivate(bruno, jessa)\nNegroid(bruno)\nUvular(bruno)\nBaptize(bruno, jessa)\nforall x (Marbleize(x, bruno) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Linnaean(x) -> Baptize(x, bruno))\nforall x (Linnaean(x) -> not Estivate(x, jessa))\nforall x (Negroid(x) and Marbleize(x, bruno) -> Baptize(bruno, jessa))\nforall x (Estivate(x, jessa) and Marbleize(jessa, bruno) -> Overt(x))\nforall x (Marbleize(x, jessa) and not Overt(jessa) -> Uvular(x))\nforall x (Marbleize(x, bruno) and Uvular(x) -> Marbleize(bruno, jessa))\nforall x (Marbleize(x, jessa) -> Opencast(x))\n\nOpencast(jessa)\n\ntherefore not Opencast(jessa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The enrica does not eat the rosina. The enrica is not wheezy. The enrica is gangly. The enrica is cxxv. The enrica is petite. The enrica is retrousse. The enrica purpose the rosina. The enrica chorus the rosina. The rosina brail the enrica. The rosina is petite. The rosina is retrousse. The rosina chorus the enrica. If someone purpose the rosina then they are petite. If someone is cxxv then they visit the rosina. If someone is cxxv then they do not eat the enrica. If someone is petite and they like the rosina then the rosina chorus the enrica. If someone brail the enrica and the enrica purpose the rosina then they are gangly. If someone purpose the enrica and the enrica is not gangly then they are retrousse. If someone purpose the rosina and they are retrousse then the rosina purpose the enrica. If someone purpose the enrica then they are wheezy. The enrica does not eat the enrica.", "logic": "\nnot Brail(enrica, rosina)\nnot Wheezy(enrica)\nGangly(enrica)\nCxxv(enrica)\nPetite(enrica)\nRetrousse(enrica)\nPurpose(enrica, rosina)\nChorus(enrica, rosina)\nBrail(rosina, enrica)\nPetite(rosina)\nRetrousse(rosina)\nChorus(rosina, enrica)\nforall x (Purpose(x, rosina) -> Petite(x))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Chorus(x, rosina))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> not Brail(x, enrica))\nforall x (Petite(x) and Purpose(x, rosina) -> Chorus(rosina, enrica))\nforall x (Brail(x, enrica) and Purpose(enrica, rosina) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Purpose(x, enrica) and not Gangly(enrica) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Purpose(x, rosina) and Retrousse(x) -> Purpose(rosina, enrica))\nforall x (Purpose(x, enrica) -> Wheezy(x))\n\nnot Brail(enrica, enrica)\n\nCxxv(enrica) and forall x (Cxxv(x) -> not Brail(x, enrica)) -> therefore not Brail(enrica, enrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The adelle does not eat the sue. The adelle is not shamed. The adelle is censorious. The adelle is moderate. The adelle is various. The adelle is budding. The adelle bird the sue. The adelle exsiccate the sue. The sue slue the adelle. The sue is various. The sue is budding. The sue exsiccate the adelle. If someone bird the sue then they are various. If someone is moderate then they visit the sue. If someone is moderate then they do not eat the adelle. If someone is various and they like the sue then the sue exsiccate the adelle. If someone slue the adelle and the adelle bird the sue then they are censorious. If someone bird the adelle and the adelle is not censorious then they are budding. If someone bird the sue and they are budding then the sue bird the adelle. If someone bird the adelle then they are shamed. The sue is not censorious.", "logic": "\nnot Slue(adelle, sue)\nnot Shamed(adelle)\nCensorious(adelle)\nModerate(adelle)\nVarious(adelle)\nBudding(adelle)\nBird(adelle, sue)\nExsiccate(adelle, sue)\nSlue(sue, adelle)\nVarious(sue)\nBudding(sue)\nExsiccate(sue, adelle)\nforall x (Bird(x, sue) -> Various(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Exsiccate(x, sue))\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> not Slue(x, adelle))\nforall x (Various(x) and Bird(x, sue) -> Exsiccate(sue, adelle))\nforall x (Slue(x, adelle) and Bird(adelle, sue) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Bird(x, adelle) and not Censorious(adelle) -> Budding(x))\nforall x (Bird(x, sue) and Budding(x) -> Bird(sue, adelle))\nforall x (Bird(x, adelle) -> Shamed(x))\n\nnot Censorious(sue)\n\nSlue(sue, adelle) and Bird(adelle, sue) and forall x (Slue(x, adelle) and Bird(adelle, sue) -> Censorious(x)) -> therefore Censorious(sue)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The nadean does not eat the blinni. The nadean is not incapable. The nadean is tramontane. The nadean is iraki. The nadean is sombre. The nadean is tempting. The nadean impugn the blinni. The nadean thatch the blinni. The blinni pine the nadean. The blinni is sombre. The blinni is tempting. The blinni thatch the nadean. If someone impugn the blinni then they are sombre. If someone is iraki then they visit the blinni. If someone is iraki then they do not eat the nadean. If someone is sombre and they like the blinni then the blinni thatch the nadean. If someone pine the nadean and the nadean impugn the blinni then they are tramontane. If someone impugn the nadean and the nadean is not tramontane then they are tempting. If someone impugn the blinni and they are tempting then the blinni impugn the nadean. If someone impugn the nadean then they are incapable. The blinni is incapable.", "logic": "\nnot Pine(nadean, blinni)\nnot Incapable(nadean)\nTramontane(nadean)\nIraki(nadean)\nSombre(nadean)\nTempting(nadean)\nImpugn(nadean, blinni)\nThatch(nadean, blinni)\nPine(blinni, nadean)\nSombre(blinni)\nTempting(blinni)\nThatch(blinni, nadean)\nforall x (Impugn(x, blinni) -> Sombre(x))\nforall x (Iraki(x) -> Thatch(x, blinni))\nforall x (Iraki(x) -> not Pine(x, nadean))\nforall x (Sombre(x) and Impugn(x, blinni) -> Thatch(blinni, nadean))\nforall x (Pine(x, nadean) and Impugn(nadean, blinni) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Impugn(x, nadean) and not Tramontane(nadean) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Impugn(x, blinni) and Tempting(x) -> Impugn(blinni, nadean))\nforall x (Impugn(x, nadean) -> Incapable(x))\n\nIncapable(blinni)\n\nImpugn(nadean, blinni) and Tempting(nadean) and forall x (Impugn(x, blinni) and Tempting(x) -> Impugn(blinni, nadean)) -> therefore Impugn(blinni, nadean) Impugn(blinni, nadean) and forall x (Impugn(x, nadean) -> Incapable(x)) -> therefore Incapable(blinni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The charlean does not eat the skipp. The charlean is not sectorial. The charlean is unsworn. The charlean is pleading. The charlean is malian. The charlean is clever. The charlean overhaul the skipp. The charlean breed the skipp. The skipp whelp the charlean. The skipp is malian. The skipp is clever. The skipp breed the charlean. If someone overhaul the skipp then they are malian. If someone is pleading then they visit the skipp. If someone is pleading then they do not eat the charlean. If someone is malian and they like the skipp then the skipp breed the charlean. If someone whelp the charlean and the charlean overhaul the skipp then they are unsworn. If someone overhaul the charlean and the charlean is not unsworn then they are clever. If someone overhaul the skipp and they are clever then the skipp overhaul the charlean. If someone overhaul the charlean then they are sectorial. The skipp is not sectorial.", "logic": "\nnot Whelp(charlean, skipp)\nnot Sectorial(charlean)\nUnsworn(charlean)\nPleading(charlean)\nMalian(charlean)\nClever(charlean)\nOverhaul(charlean, skipp)\nBreed(charlean, skipp)\nWhelp(skipp, charlean)\nMalian(skipp)\nClever(skipp)\nBreed(skipp, charlean)\nforall x (Overhaul(x, skipp) -> Malian(x))\nforall x (Pleading(x) -> Breed(x, skipp))\nforall x (Pleading(x) -> not Whelp(x, charlean))\nforall x (Malian(x) and Overhaul(x, skipp) -> Breed(skipp, charlean))\nforall x (Whelp(x, charlean) and Overhaul(charlean, skipp) -> Unsworn(x))\nforall x (Overhaul(x, charlean) and not Unsworn(charlean) -> Clever(x))\nforall x (Overhaul(x, skipp) and Clever(x) -> Overhaul(skipp, charlean))\nforall x (Overhaul(x, charlean) -> Sectorial(x))\n\nnot Sectorial(skipp)\n\nOverhaul(charlean, skipp) and Clever(charlean) and forall x (Overhaul(x, skipp) and Clever(x) -> Overhaul(skipp, charlean)) -> therefore Overhaul(skipp, charlean) Overhaul(skipp, charlean) and forall x (Overhaul(x, charlean) -> Sectorial(x)) -> therefore Sectorial(skipp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The avril does not eat the matthiew. The avril is not hugoesque. The avril is zenithal. The avril is chatty. The avril is scrivened. The avril is unopen. The avril unburden the matthiew. The avril recommend the matthiew. The matthiew disinter the avril. The matthiew is scrivened. The matthiew is unopen. The matthiew recommend the avril. If someone unburden the matthiew then they are scrivened. If someone is chatty then they visit the matthiew. If someone is chatty then they do not eat the avril. If someone is scrivened and they like the matthiew then the matthiew recommend the avril. If someone disinter the avril and the avril unburden the matthiew then they are zenithal. If someone unburden the avril and the avril is not zenithal then they are unopen. If someone unburden the matthiew and they are unopen then the matthiew unburden the avril. If someone unburden the avril then they are hugoesque. The matthiew does not visit the matthiew.", "logic": "\nnot Disinter(avril, matthiew)\nnot Hugoesque(avril)\nZenithal(avril)\nChatty(avril)\nScrivened(avril)\nUnopen(avril)\nUnburden(avril, matthiew)\nRecommend(avril, matthiew)\nDisinter(matthiew, avril)\nScrivened(matthiew)\nUnopen(matthiew)\nRecommend(matthiew, avril)\nforall x (Unburden(x, matthiew) -> Scrivened(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Recommend(x, matthiew))\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> not Disinter(x, avril))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) and Unburden(x, matthiew) -> Recommend(matthiew, avril))\nforall x (Disinter(x, avril) and Unburden(avril, matthiew) -> Zenithal(x))\nforall x (Unburden(x, avril) and not Zenithal(avril) -> Unopen(x))\nforall x (Unburden(x, matthiew) and Unopen(x) -> Unburden(matthiew, avril))\nforall x (Unburden(x, avril) -> Hugoesque(x))\n\nnot Recommend(matthiew, matthiew)\n\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Recommend(x, matthiew)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The elaina does not eat the fidela. The elaina is not wainscoted. The elaina is intimate. The elaina is storeyed. The elaina is northerly. The elaina is avirulent. The elaina peel the fidela. The elaina alcoholise the fidela. The fidela pillory the elaina. The fidela is northerly. The fidela is avirulent. The fidela alcoholise the elaina. If someone peel the fidela then they are northerly. If someone is storeyed then they visit the fidela. If someone is storeyed then they do not eat the elaina. If someone is northerly and they like the fidela then the fidela alcoholise the elaina. If someone pillory the elaina and the elaina peel the fidela then they are intimate. If someone peel the elaina and the elaina is not intimate then they are avirulent. If someone peel the fidela and they are avirulent then the fidela peel the elaina. If someone peel the elaina then they are wainscoted. The fidela peel the fidela.", "logic": "\nnot Pillory(elaina, fidela)\nnot Wainscoted(elaina)\nIntimate(elaina)\nStoreyed(elaina)\nNortherly(elaina)\nAvirulent(elaina)\nPeel(elaina, fidela)\nAlcoholise(elaina, fidela)\nPillory(fidela, elaina)\nNortherly(fidela)\nAvirulent(fidela)\nAlcoholise(fidela, elaina)\nforall x (Peel(x, fidela) -> Northerly(x))\nforall x (Storeyed(x) -> Alcoholise(x, fidela))\nforall x (Storeyed(x) -> not Pillory(x, elaina))\nforall x (Northerly(x) and Peel(x, fidela) -> Alcoholise(fidela, elaina))\nforall x (Pillory(x, elaina) and Peel(elaina, fidela) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Peel(x, elaina) and not Intimate(elaina) -> Avirulent(x))\nforall x (Peel(x, fidela) and Avirulent(x) -> Peel(fidela, elaina))\nforall x (Peel(x, elaina) -> Wainscoted(x))\n\nPeel(fidela, fidela)\n\nPeel(fidela, fidela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The teane does not eat the yacov. The teane is not gracile. The teane is glial. The teane is unnamed. The teane is cragfast. The teane is misrelated. The teane beam the yacov. The teane pout the yacov. The yacov swish the teane. The yacov is cragfast. The yacov is misrelated. The yacov pout the teane. If someone beam the yacov then they are cragfast. If someone is unnamed then they visit the yacov. If someone is unnamed then they do not eat the teane. If someone is cragfast and they like the yacov then the yacov pout the teane. If someone swish the teane and the teane beam the yacov then they are glial. If someone beam the teane and the teane is not glial then they are misrelated. If someone beam the yacov and they are misrelated then the yacov beam the teane. If someone beam the teane then they are gracile. The yacov does not eat the yacov.", "logic": "\nnot Swish(teane, yacov)\nnot Gracile(teane)\nGlial(teane)\nUnnamed(teane)\nCragfast(teane)\nMisrelated(teane)\nBeam(teane, yacov)\nPout(teane, yacov)\nSwish(yacov, teane)\nCragfast(yacov)\nMisrelated(yacov)\nPout(yacov, teane)\nforall x (Beam(x, yacov) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Unnamed(x) -> Pout(x, yacov))\nforall x (Unnamed(x) -> not Swish(x, teane))\nforall x (Cragfast(x) and Beam(x, yacov) -> Pout(yacov, teane))\nforall x (Swish(x, teane) and Beam(teane, yacov) -> Glial(x))\nforall x (Beam(x, teane) and not Glial(teane) -> Misrelated(x))\nforall x (Beam(x, yacov) and Misrelated(x) -> Beam(yacov, teane))\nforall x (Beam(x, teane) -> Gracile(x))\n\nnot Swish(yacov, yacov)\n\nnot Swish(yacov, yacov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The devin does not eat the ricard. The devin is not threatened. The devin is gilt. The devin is ended. The devin is dwindling. The devin is hydric. The devin trowel the ricard. The devin satisfy the ricard. The ricard humidify the devin. The ricard is dwindling. The ricard is hydric. The ricard satisfy the devin. If someone trowel the ricard then they are dwindling. If someone is ended then they visit the ricard. If someone is ended then they do not eat the devin. If someone is dwindling and they like the ricard then the ricard satisfy the devin. If someone humidify the devin and the devin trowel the ricard then they are gilt. If someone trowel the devin and the devin is not gilt then they are hydric. If someone trowel the ricard and they are hydric then the ricard trowel the devin. If someone trowel the devin then they are threatened. The devin trowel the devin.", "logic": "\nnot Humidify(devin, ricard)\nnot Threatened(devin)\nGilt(devin)\nEnded(devin)\nDwindling(devin)\nHydric(devin)\nTrowel(devin, ricard)\nSatisfy(devin, ricard)\nHumidify(ricard, devin)\nDwindling(ricard)\nHydric(ricard)\nSatisfy(ricard, devin)\nforall x (Trowel(x, ricard) -> Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Ended(x) -> Satisfy(x, ricard))\nforall x (Ended(x) -> not Humidify(x, devin))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Trowel(x, ricard) -> Satisfy(ricard, devin))\nforall x (Humidify(x, devin) and Trowel(devin, ricard) -> Gilt(x))\nforall x (Trowel(x, devin) and not Gilt(devin) -> Hydric(x))\nforall x (Trowel(x, ricard) and Hydric(x) -> Trowel(ricard, devin))\nforall x (Trowel(x, devin) -> Threatened(x))\n\nTrowel(devin, devin)\n\nTrowel(devin, devin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The isidore does not eat the dari. The isidore is not blurred. The isidore is dandyish. The isidore is flattering. The isidore is ornery. The isidore is pilotless. The isidore ulcerate the dari. The isidore contort the dari. The dari inscribe the isidore. The dari is ornery. The dari is pilotless. The dari contort the isidore. If someone ulcerate the dari then they are ornery. If someone is flattering then they visit the dari. If someone is flattering then they do not eat the isidore. If someone is ornery and they like the dari then the dari contort the isidore. If someone inscribe the isidore and the isidore ulcerate the dari then they are dandyish. If someone ulcerate the isidore and the isidore is not dandyish then they are pilotless. If someone ulcerate the dari and they are pilotless then the dari ulcerate the isidore. If someone ulcerate the isidore then they are blurred. The dari is not flattering.", "logic": "\nnot Inscribe(isidore, dari)\nnot Blurred(isidore)\nDandyish(isidore)\nFlattering(isidore)\nOrnery(isidore)\nPilotless(isidore)\nUlcerate(isidore, dari)\nContort(isidore, dari)\nInscribe(dari, isidore)\nOrnery(dari)\nPilotless(dari)\nContort(dari, isidore)\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, dari) -> Ornery(x))\nforall x (Flattering(x) -> Contort(x, dari))\nforall x (Flattering(x) -> not Inscribe(x, isidore))\nforall x (Ornery(x) and Ulcerate(x, dari) -> Contort(dari, isidore))\nforall x (Inscribe(x, isidore) and Ulcerate(isidore, dari) -> Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, isidore) and not Dandyish(isidore) -> Pilotless(x))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, dari) and Pilotless(x) -> Ulcerate(dari, isidore))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, isidore) -> Blurred(x))\n\nnot Flattering(dari)\n\nnot Flattering(dari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The estell does not eat the joane. The estell is not mistreated. The estell is hispid. The estell is melting. The estell is casual. The estell is savoury. The estell decoct the joane. The estell spear the joane. The joane woosh the estell. The joane is casual. The joane is savoury. The joane spear the estell. If someone decoct the joane then they are casual. If someone is melting then they visit the joane. If someone is melting then they do not eat the estell. If someone is casual and they like the joane then the joane spear the estell. If someone woosh the estell and the estell decoct the joane then they are hispid. If someone decoct the estell and the estell is not hispid then they are savoury. If someone decoct the joane and they are savoury then the joane decoct the estell. If someone decoct the estell then they are mistreated. The estell spear the estell.", "logic": "\nnot Woosh(estell, joane)\nnot Mistreated(estell)\nHispid(estell)\nMelting(estell)\nCasual(estell)\nSavoury(estell)\nDecoct(estell, joane)\nSpear(estell, joane)\nWoosh(joane, estell)\nCasual(joane)\nSavoury(joane)\nSpear(joane, estell)\nforall x (Decoct(x, joane) -> Casual(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Spear(x, joane))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> not Woosh(x, estell))\nforall x (Casual(x) and Decoct(x, joane) -> Spear(joane, estell))\nforall x (Woosh(x, estell) and Decoct(estell, joane) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Decoct(x, estell) and not Hispid(estell) -> Savoury(x))\nforall x (Decoct(x, joane) and Savoury(x) -> Decoct(joane, estell))\nforall x (Decoct(x, estell) -> Mistreated(x))\n\nSpear(estell, estell)\n\nSpear(estell, estell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1896"} {"premises": "The viviene is downtown. The viviene horsewhip the perry. The perry altercate the viviene. Round people are unhallowed. If someone altercate the viviene then they are fibrillose. If someone is salutary then they are downtown. If the viviene is not downtown and the viviene is not unhallowed then the viviene select the perry. If the perry horsewhip the viviene then the viviene does not eat the perry. If someone altercate the viviene and the viviene does not eat the perry then the viviene horsewhip the perry. The viviene horsewhip the perry.", "logic": "\nDowntown(viviene)\nHorsewhip(viviene, perry)\nAltercate(perry, viviene)\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Unhallowed(x))\nforall x (Altercate(x, viviene) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Salutary(x) -> Downtown(x))\nnot Downtown(viviene) and not Unhallowed(viviene) -> Select(viviene, perry)\nHorsewhip(perry, viviene) -> not Select(viviene, perry)\nforall x (Altercate(x, viviene) and not Select(viviene, perry) -> Horsewhip(viviene, perry))\n\nHorsewhip(viviene, perry)\n\ntherefore Horsewhip(viviene, perry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The oneida is unaffected. The oneida sprinkle the melita. The melita allure the oneida. Round people are drunken. If someone allure the oneida then they are mawkish. If someone is cosher then they are unaffected. If the oneida is not unaffected and the oneida is not drunken then the oneida kotow the melita. If the melita sprinkle the oneida then the oneida does not eat the melita. If someone allure the oneida and the oneida does not eat the melita then the oneida sprinkle the melita. The oneida is not unaffected.", "logic": "\nUnaffected(oneida)\nSprinkle(oneida, melita)\nAllure(melita, oneida)\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Allure(x, oneida) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nnot Unaffected(oneida) and not Drunken(oneida) -> Kotow(oneida, melita)\nSprinkle(melita, oneida) -> not Kotow(oneida, melita)\nforall x (Allure(x, oneida) and not Kotow(oneida, melita) -> Sprinkle(oneida, melita))\n\nnot Unaffected(oneida)\n\ntherefore Unaffected(oneida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The gipsy is rotatory. The gipsy ooze the dimitrios. The dimitrios paganize the gipsy. Round people are related. If someone paganize the gipsy then they are denuded. If someone is boundless then they are rotatory. If the gipsy is not rotatory and the gipsy is not related then the gipsy reconfirm the dimitrios. If the dimitrios ooze the gipsy then the gipsy does not eat the dimitrios. If someone paganize the gipsy and the gipsy does not eat the dimitrios then the gipsy ooze the dimitrios. The dimitrios is denuded.", "logic": "\nRotatory(gipsy)\nOoze(gipsy, dimitrios)\nPaganize(dimitrios, gipsy)\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Related(x))\nforall x (Paganize(x, gipsy) -> Denuded(x))\nforall x (Boundless(x) -> Rotatory(x))\nnot Rotatory(gipsy) and not Related(gipsy) -> Reconfirm(gipsy, dimitrios)\nOoze(dimitrios, gipsy) -> not Reconfirm(gipsy, dimitrios)\nforall x (Paganize(x, gipsy) and not Reconfirm(gipsy, dimitrios) -> Ooze(gipsy, dimitrios))\n\nDenuded(dimitrios)\n\nPaganize(dimitrios, gipsy) and forall x (Paganize(x, gipsy) -> Denuded(x)) -> therefore Denuded(dimitrios)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The benjamin is adducting. The benjamin enslave the carrie. The carrie water the benjamin. Round people are kinky. If someone water the benjamin then they are imminent. If someone is gleaming then they are adducting. If the benjamin is not adducting and the benjamin is not kinky then the benjamin flounce the carrie. If the carrie enslave the benjamin then the benjamin does not eat the carrie. If someone water the benjamin and the benjamin does not eat the carrie then the benjamin enslave the carrie. The carrie is not imminent.", "logic": "\nAdducting(benjamin)\nEnslave(benjamin, carrie)\nWater(carrie, benjamin)\nforall x (Imminent(x) -> Kinky(x))\nforall x (Water(x, benjamin) -> Imminent(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Adducting(x))\nnot Adducting(benjamin) and not Kinky(benjamin) -> Flounce(benjamin, carrie)\nEnslave(carrie, benjamin) -> not Flounce(benjamin, carrie)\nforall x (Water(x, benjamin) and not Flounce(benjamin, carrie) -> Enslave(benjamin, carrie))\n\nnot Imminent(carrie)\n\nWater(carrie, benjamin) and forall x (Water(x, benjamin) -> Imminent(x)) -> therefore Imminent(carrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The schuyler is abroach. The schuyler spondaize the devondra. The devondra hymn the schuyler. Round people are migratory. If someone hymn the schuyler then they are tinpot. If someone is haywire then they are abroach. If the schuyler is not abroach and the schuyler is not migratory then the schuyler deionize the devondra. If the devondra spondaize the schuyler then the schuyler does not eat the devondra. If someone hymn the schuyler and the schuyler does not eat the devondra then the schuyler spondaize the devondra. The devondra is migratory.", "logic": "\nAbroach(schuyler)\nSpondaize(schuyler, devondra)\nHymn(devondra, schuyler)\nforall x (Tinpot(x) -> Migratory(x))\nforall x (Hymn(x, schuyler) -> Tinpot(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Abroach(x))\nnot Abroach(schuyler) and not Migratory(schuyler) -> Deionize(schuyler, devondra)\nSpondaize(devondra, schuyler) -> not Deionize(schuyler, devondra)\nforall x (Hymn(x, schuyler) and not Deionize(schuyler, devondra) -> Spondaize(schuyler, devondra))\n\nMigratory(devondra)\n\nHymn(devondra, schuyler) and forall x (Hymn(x, schuyler) -> Tinpot(x)) -> therefore Tinpot(devondra) Tinpot(devondra) and forall x (Tinpot(x) -> Migratory(x)) -> therefore Migratory(devondra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The nelia is basilary. The nelia scrimshank the vida. The vida scoop the nelia. Round people are humbling. If someone scoop the nelia then they are cubelike. If someone is unbitter then they are basilary. If the nelia is not basilary and the nelia is not humbling then the nelia script the vida. If the vida scrimshank the nelia then the nelia does not eat the vida. If someone scoop the nelia and the nelia does not eat the vida then the nelia scrimshank the vida. The vida is not humbling.", "logic": "\nBasilary(nelia)\nScrimshank(nelia, vida)\nScoop(vida, nelia)\nforall x (Cubelike(x) -> Humbling(x))\nforall x (Scoop(x, nelia) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Unbitter(x) -> Basilary(x))\nnot Basilary(nelia) and not Humbling(nelia) -> Script(nelia, vida)\nScrimshank(vida, nelia) -> not Script(nelia, vida)\nforall x (Scoop(x, nelia) and not Script(nelia, vida) -> Scrimshank(nelia, vida))\n\nnot Humbling(vida)\n\nScoop(vida, nelia) and forall x (Scoop(x, nelia) -> Cubelike(x)) -> therefore Cubelike(vida) Cubelike(vida) and forall x (Cubelike(x) -> Humbling(x)) -> therefore Humbling(vida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The kellie is polluted. The kellie wench the trace. The trace slough the kellie. Round people are flavorous. If someone slough the kellie then they are occasional. If someone is mouselike then they are polluted. If the kellie is not polluted and the kellie is not flavorous then the kellie wend the trace. If the trace wench the kellie then the kellie does not eat the trace. If someone slough the kellie and the kellie does not eat the trace then the kellie wench the trace. The kellie is not flavorous.", "logic": "\nPolluted(kellie)\nWench(kellie, trace)\nSlough(trace, kellie)\nforall x (Occasional(x) -> Flavorous(x))\nforall x (Slough(x, kellie) -> Occasional(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Polluted(x))\nnot Polluted(kellie) and not Flavorous(kellie) -> Wend(kellie, trace)\nWench(trace, kellie) -> not Wend(kellie, trace)\nforall x (Slough(x, kellie) and not Wend(kellie, trace) -> Wench(kellie, trace))\n\nnot Flavorous(kellie)\n\nforall x (Occasional(x) -> Flavorous(x)) <- forall x (Slough(x, kellie) -> Occasional(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The meggi is feral. The meggi action the aharon. The aharon learn the meggi. Round people are devoted. If someone learn the meggi then they are uplifted. If someone is insolent then they are feral. If the meggi is not feral and the meggi is not devoted then the meggi soak the aharon. If the aharon action the meggi then the meggi does not eat the aharon. If someone learn the meggi and the meggi does not eat the aharon then the meggi action the aharon. The meggi soak the aharon.", "logic": "\nFeral(meggi)\nAction(meggi, aharon)\nLearn(aharon, meggi)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) -> Devoted(x))\nforall x (Learn(x, meggi) -> Uplifted(x))\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Feral(x))\nnot Feral(meggi) and not Devoted(meggi) -> Soak(meggi, aharon)\nAction(aharon, meggi) -> not Soak(meggi, aharon)\nforall x (Learn(x, meggi) and not Soak(meggi, aharon) -> Action(meggi, aharon))\n\nSoak(meggi, aharon)\n\nnot Feral(meggi) and not Devoted(meggi) -> Soak(meggi, aharon) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The pinchas is exilic. The pinchas scuttle the douglas. The douglas page the pinchas. Round people are manifold. If someone page the pinchas then they are puberulent. If someone is neonatal then they are exilic. If the pinchas is not exilic and the pinchas is not manifold then the pinchas colligate the douglas. If the douglas scuttle the pinchas then the pinchas does not eat the douglas. If someone page the pinchas and the pinchas does not eat the douglas then the pinchas scuttle the douglas. The pinchas is not puberulent.", "logic": "\nExilic(pinchas)\nScuttle(pinchas, douglas)\nPage(douglas, pinchas)\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Manifold(x))\nforall x (Page(x, pinchas) -> Puberulent(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Exilic(x))\nnot Exilic(pinchas) and not Manifold(pinchas) -> Colligate(pinchas, douglas)\nScuttle(douglas, pinchas) -> not Colligate(pinchas, douglas)\nforall x (Page(x, pinchas) and not Colligate(pinchas, douglas) -> Scuttle(pinchas, douglas))\n\nnot Puberulent(pinchas)\n\nforall x (Page(x, pinchas) -> Puberulent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The mariam is tedious. The mariam corn the karrie. The karrie glance the mariam. Round people are conforming. If someone glance the mariam then they are protrusive. If someone is powdered then they are tedious. If the mariam is not tedious and the mariam is not conforming then the mariam undershoot the karrie. If the karrie corn the mariam then the mariam does not eat the karrie. If someone glance the mariam and the mariam does not eat the karrie then the mariam corn the karrie. The mariam is powdered.", "logic": "\nTedious(mariam)\nCorn(mariam, karrie)\nGlance(karrie, mariam)\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Conforming(x))\nforall x (Glance(x, mariam) -> Protrusive(x))\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Tedious(x))\nnot Tedious(mariam) and not Conforming(mariam) -> Undershoot(mariam, karrie)\nCorn(karrie, mariam) -> not Undershoot(mariam, karrie)\nforall x (Glance(x, mariam) and not Undershoot(mariam, karrie) -> Corn(mariam, karrie))\n\nPowdered(mariam)\n\nPowdered(mariam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The nathaniel is carousing. The nathaniel creep the heloise. The heloise garrote the nathaniel. Round people are bauxitic. If someone garrote the nathaniel then they are true. If someone is romanist then they are carousing. If the nathaniel is not carousing and the nathaniel is not bauxitic then the nathaniel stop the heloise. If the heloise creep the nathaniel then the nathaniel does not eat the heloise. If someone garrote the nathaniel and the nathaniel does not eat the heloise then the nathaniel creep the heloise. The nathaniel does not see the nathaniel.", "logic": "\nCarousing(nathaniel)\nCreep(nathaniel, heloise)\nGarrote(heloise, nathaniel)\nforall x (True(x) -> Bauxitic(x))\nforall x (Garrote(x, nathaniel) -> True(x))\nforall x (Romanist(x) -> Carousing(x))\nnot Carousing(nathaniel) and not Bauxitic(nathaniel) -> Stop(nathaniel, heloise)\nCreep(heloise, nathaniel) -> not Stop(nathaniel, heloise)\nforall x (Garrote(x, nathaniel) and not Stop(nathaniel, heloise) -> Creep(nathaniel, heloise))\n\nnot Creep(nathaniel, nathaniel)\n\nnot Creep(nathaniel, nathaniel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The leodora is patriotic. The leodora invigilate the rodolfo. The rodolfo prorogue the leodora. Round people are overgrown. If someone prorogue the leodora then they are bashful. If someone is debonnaire then they are patriotic. If the leodora is not patriotic and the leodora is not overgrown then the leodora smooth the rodolfo. If the rodolfo invigilate the leodora then the leodora does not eat the rodolfo. If someone prorogue the leodora and the leodora does not eat the rodolfo then the leodora invigilate the rodolfo. The rodolfo invigilate the leodora.", "logic": "\nPatriotic(leodora)\nInvigilate(leodora, rodolfo)\nProrogue(rodolfo, leodora)\nforall x (Bashful(x) -> Overgrown(x))\nforall x (Prorogue(x, leodora) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) -> Patriotic(x))\nnot Patriotic(leodora) and not Overgrown(leodora) -> Smooth(leodora, rodolfo)\nInvigilate(rodolfo, leodora) -> not Smooth(leodora, rodolfo)\nforall x (Prorogue(x, leodora) and not Smooth(leodora, rodolfo) -> Invigilate(leodora, rodolfo))\n\nInvigilate(rodolfo, leodora)\n\nInvigilate(rodolfo, leodora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1263"} {"premises": "The leese invert the jammie. The leese is walloping. The leese is eleventh. The leese is glum. The leese is multiplied. The leese is portuguese. The leese converse the jammie. The leese display the jammie. The jammie invert the leese. The jammie is walloping. The jammie is glum. The jammie is multiplied. The jammie is portuguese. The jammie converse the leese. The jammie display the leese. If something converse the leese and the leese invert the jammie then it invert the leese. If something is eleventh then it converse the leese. The jammie is glum.", "logic": "\nInvert(leese, jammie)\nWalloping(leese)\nEleventh(leese)\nGlum(leese)\nMultiplied(leese)\nPortuguese(leese)\nConverse(leese, jammie)\nDisplay(leese, jammie)\nInvert(jammie, leese)\nWalloping(jammie)\nGlum(jammie)\nMultiplied(jammie)\nPortuguese(jammie)\nConverse(jammie, leese)\nDisplay(jammie, leese)\nforall x (Converse(x, leese) and Invert(leese, jammie) -> Invert(x, leese))\nforall x (Eleventh(x) -> Converse(x, leese))\n\nGlum(jammie)\n\ntherefore Glum(jammie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The greta dedicate the norine. The greta is arboreous. The greta is chlorotic. The greta is uneasy. The greta is aforesaid. The greta is torulose. The greta gallop the norine. The greta flail the norine. The norine dedicate the greta. The norine is arboreous. The norine is uneasy. The norine is aforesaid. The norine is torulose. The norine gallop the greta. The norine flail the greta. If something gallop the greta and the greta dedicate the norine then it dedicate the greta. If something is chlorotic then it gallop the greta. The greta is not chlorotic.", "logic": "\nDedicate(greta, norine)\nArboreous(greta)\nChlorotic(greta)\nUneasy(greta)\nAforesaid(greta)\nTorulose(greta)\nGallop(greta, norine)\nFlail(greta, norine)\nDedicate(norine, greta)\nArboreous(norine)\nUneasy(norine)\nAforesaid(norine)\nTorulose(norine)\nGallop(norine, greta)\nFlail(norine, greta)\nforall x (Gallop(x, greta) and Dedicate(greta, norine) -> Dedicate(x, greta))\nforall x (Chlorotic(x) -> Gallop(x, greta))\n\nnot Chlorotic(greta)\n\ntherefore Chlorotic(greta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The deborah subdue the jared. The deborah is mesmerized. The deborah is unmilitary. The deborah is durable. The deborah is brunet. The deborah is chorionic. The deborah befog the jared. The deborah await the jared. The jared subdue the deborah. The jared is mesmerized. The jared is durable. The jared is brunet. The jared is chorionic. The jared befog the deborah. The jared await the deborah. If something befog the deborah and the deborah subdue the jared then it subdue the deborah. If something is unmilitary then it befog the deborah. The deborah befog the deborah.", "logic": "\nSubdue(deborah, jared)\nMesmerized(deborah)\nUnmilitary(deborah)\nDurable(deborah)\nBrunet(deborah)\nChorionic(deborah)\nBefog(deborah, jared)\nAwait(deborah, jared)\nSubdue(jared, deborah)\nMesmerized(jared)\nDurable(jared)\nBrunet(jared)\nChorionic(jared)\nBefog(jared, deborah)\nAwait(jared, deborah)\nforall x (Befog(x, deborah) and Subdue(deborah, jared) -> Subdue(x, deborah))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) -> Befog(x, deborah))\n\nBefog(deborah, deborah)\n\nUnmilitary(deborah) and forall x (Unmilitary(x) -> Befog(x, deborah)) -> therefore Befog(deborah, deborah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The guillermo recurve the marquita. The guillermo is staccato. The guillermo is stalkless. The guillermo is biradial. The guillermo is callable. The guillermo is consequent. The guillermo live the marquita. The guillermo accumulate the marquita. The marquita recurve the guillermo. The marquita is staccato. The marquita is biradial. The marquita is callable. The marquita is consequent. The marquita live the guillermo. The marquita accumulate the guillermo. If something live the guillermo and the guillermo recurve the marquita then it recurve the guillermo. If something is stalkless then it live the guillermo. The guillermo does not need the guillermo.", "logic": "\nRecurve(guillermo, marquita)\nStaccato(guillermo)\nStalkless(guillermo)\nBiradial(guillermo)\nCallable(guillermo)\nConsequent(guillermo)\nLive(guillermo, marquita)\nAccumulate(guillermo, marquita)\nRecurve(marquita, guillermo)\nStaccato(marquita)\nBiradial(marquita)\nCallable(marquita)\nConsequent(marquita)\nLive(marquita, guillermo)\nAccumulate(marquita, guillermo)\nforall x (Live(x, guillermo) and Recurve(guillermo, marquita) -> Recurve(x, guillermo))\nforall x (Stalkless(x) -> Live(x, guillermo))\n\nnot Live(guillermo, guillermo)\n\nStalkless(guillermo) and forall x (Stalkless(x) -> Live(x, guillermo)) -> therefore Live(guillermo, guillermo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The niven defang the ryann. The niven is apractic. The niven is dioestrous. The niven is sumptuary. The niven is ethiopian. The niven is moldable. The niven oxygenate the ryann. The niven detect the ryann. The ryann defang the niven. The ryann is apractic. The ryann is sumptuary. The ryann is ethiopian. The ryann is moldable. The ryann oxygenate the niven. The ryann detect the niven. If something oxygenate the niven and the niven defang the ryann then it defang the niven. If something is dioestrous then it oxygenate the niven. The niven defang the niven.", "logic": "\nDefang(niven, ryann)\nApractic(niven)\nDioestrous(niven)\nSumptuary(niven)\nEthiopian(niven)\nMoldable(niven)\nOxygenate(niven, ryann)\nDetect(niven, ryann)\nDefang(ryann, niven)\nApractic(ryann)\nSumptuary(ryann)\nEthiopian(ryann)\nMoldable(ryann)\nOxygenate(ryann, niven)\nDetect(ryann, niven)\nforall x (Oxygenate(x, niven) and Defang(niven, ryann) -> Defang(x, niven))\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Oxygenate(x, niven))\n\nDefang(niven, niven)\n\nDioestrous(niven) and forall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Oxygenate(x, niven)) -> therefore Oxygenate(niven, niven) Oxygenate(niven, niven) and Defang(niven, ryann) and forall x (Oxygenate(x, niven) and Defang(niven, ryann) -> Defang(x, niven)) -> therefore Defang(niven, niven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The alexander dismay the ranice. The alexander is nectarous. The alexander is briny. The alexander is eighty. The alexander is stripy. The alexander is bromic. The alexander oyster the ranice. The alexander rule the ranice. The ranice dismay the alexander. The ranice is nectarous. The ranice is eighty. The ranice is stripy. The ranice is bromic. The ranice oyster the alexander. The ranice rule the alexander. If something oyster the alexander and the alexander dismay the ranice then it dismay the alexander. If something is briny then it oyster the alexander. The alexander does not chase the alexander.", "logic": "\nDismay(alexander, ranice)\nNectarous(alexander)\nBriny(alexander)\nEighty(alexander)\nStripy(alexander)\nBromic(alexander)\nOyster(alexander, ranice)\nRule(alexander, ranice)\nDismay(ranice, alexander)\nNectarous(ranice)\nEighty(ranice)\nStripy(ranice)\nBromic(ranice)\nOyster(ranice, alexander)\nRule(ranice, alexander)\nforall x (Oyster(x, alexander) and Dismay(alexander, ranice) -> Dismay(x, alexander))\nforall x (Briny(x) -> Oyster(x, alexander))\n\nnot Dismay(alexander, alexander)\n\nBriny(alexander) and forall x (Briny(x) -> Oyster(x, alexander)) -> therefore Oyster(alexander, alexander) Oyster(alexander, alexander) and Dismay(alexander, ranice) and forall x (Oyster(x, alexander) and Dismay(alexander, ranice) -> Dismay(x, alexander)) -> therefore Dismay(alexander, alexander)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The holly bedhop the erhart. The holly is vociferous. The holly is epidermic. The holly is aerated. The holly is causative. The holly is chaffy. The holly fast the erhart. The holly telecast the erhart. The erhart bedhop the holly. The erhart is vociferous. The erhart is aerated. The erhart is causative. The erhart is chaffy. The erhart fast the holly. The erhart telecast the holly. If something fast the holly and the holly bedhop the erhart then it bedhop the holly. If something is epidermic then it fast the holly. The holly does not see the holly.", "logic": "\nBedhop(holly, erhart)\nVociferous(holly)\nEpidermic(holly)\nAerated(holly)\nCausative(holly)\nChaffy(holly)\nFast(holly, erhart)\nTelecast(holly, erhart)\nBedhop(erhart, holly)\nVociferous(erhart)\nAerated(erhart)\nCausative(erhart)\nChaffy(erhart)\nFast(erhart, holly)\nTelecast(erhart, holly)\nforall x (Fast(x, holly) and Bedhop(holly, erhart) -> Bedhop(x, holly))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) -> Fast(x, holly))\n\nnot Telecast(holly, holly)\n\nnot Telecast(holly, holly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The fabrianne transfix the ferdie. The fabrianne is caulked. The fabrianne is resolvable. The fabrianne is clarifying. The fabrianne is inclusive. The fabrianne is snappy. The fabrianne disjoin the ferdie. The fabrianne infatuate the ferdie. The ferdie transfix the fabrianne. The ferdie is caulked. The ferdie is clarifying. The ferdie is inclusive. The ferdie is snappy. The ferdie disjoin the fabrianne. The ferdie infatuate the fabrianne. If something disjoin the fabrianne and the fabrianne transfix the ferdie then it transfix the fabrianne. If something is resolvable then it disjoin the fabrianne. The ferdie is resolvable.", "logic": "\nTransfix(fabrianne, ferdie)\nCaulked(fabrianne)\nResolvable(fabrianne)\nClarifying(fabrianne)\nInclusive(fabrianne)\nSnappy(fabrianne)\nDisjoin(fabrianne, ferdie)\nInfatuate(fabrianne, ferdie)\nTransfix(ferdie, fabrianne)\nCaulked(ferdie)\nClarifying(ferdie)\nInclusive(ferdie)\nSnappy(ferdie)\nDisjoin(ferdie, fabrianne)\nInfatuate(ferdie, fabrianne)\nforall x (Disjoin(x, fabrianne) and Transfix(fabrianne, ferdie) -> Transfix(x, fabrianne))\nforall x (Resolvable(x) -> Disjoin(x, fabrianne))\n\nResolvable(ferdie)\n\nResolvable(ferdie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The lysandra quip the darian. The lysandra is appointed. The lysandra is lathery. The lysandra is suppliant. The lysandra is inundated. The lysandra is nidifugous. The lysandra whore the darian. The lysandra chitchat the darian. The darian quip the lysandra. The darian is appointed. The darian is suppliant. The darian is inundated. The darian is nidifugous. The darian whore the lysandra. The darian chitchat the lysandra. If something whore the lysandra and the lysandra quip the darian then it quip the lysandra. If something is lathery then it whore the lysandra. The darian does not chase the darian.", "logic": "\nQuip(lysandra, darian)\nAppointed(lysandra)\nLathery(lysandra)\nSuppliant(lysandra)\nInundated(lysandra)\nNidifugous(lysandra)\nWhore(lysandra, darian)\nChitchat(lysandra, darian)\nQuip(darian, lysandra)\nAppointed(darian)\nSuppliant(darian)\nInundated(darian)\nNidifugous(darian)\nWhore(darian, lysandra)\nChitchat(darian, lysandra)\nforall x (Whore(x, lysandra) and Quip(lysandra, darian) -> Quip(x, lysandra))\nforall x (Lathery(x) -> Whore(x, lysandra))\n\nnot Quip(darian, darian)\n\nnot Quip(darian, darian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The gordie contest the sonny. The gordie is uniate. The gordie is semiformal. The gordie is screechy. The gordie is bearish. The gordie is solvable. The gordie satirize the sonny. The gordie outgrow the sonny. The sonny contest the gordie. The sonny is uniate. The sonny is screechy. The sonny is bearish. The sonny is solvable. The sonny satirize the gordie. The sonny outgrow the gordie. If something satirize the gordie and the gordie contest the sonny then it contest the gordie. If something is semiformal then it satirize the gordie. The sonny outgrow the sonny.", "logic": "\nContest(gordie, sonny)\nUniate(gordie)\nSemiformal(gordie)\nScreechy(gordie)\nBearish(gordie)\nSolvable(gordie)\nSatirize(gordie, sonny)\nOutgrow(gordie, sonny)\nContest(sonny, gordie)\nUniate(sonny)\nScreechy(sonny)\nBearish(sonny)\nSolvable(sonny)\nSatirize(sonny, gordie)\nOutgrow(sonny, gordie)\nforall x (Satirize(x, gordie) and Contest(gordie, sonny) -> Contest(x, gordie))\nforall x (Semiformal(x) -> Satirize(x, gordie))\n\nOutgrow(sonny, sonny)\n\nOutgrow(sonny, sonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-844"} {"premises": "The gabriel wring the juli. The gabriel quiz the juli. The juli is totalistic. If the gabriel is anabiotic then the gabriel wring the juli. If something wring the juli then it wring the gabriel. If something wring the gabriel then it is anabiotic. The gabriel quiz the juli.", "logic": "\nWring(gabriel, juli)\nQuiz(gabriel, juli)\nTotalistic(juli)\nAnabiotic(gabriel) -> Wring(gabriel, juli)\nforall x (Wring(x, juli) -> Wring(x, gabriel))\nforall x (Wring(x, gabriel) -> Anabiotic(x))\n\nQuiz(gabriel, juli)\n\ntherefore Quiz(gabriel, juli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The tracey reecho the lucas. The tracey harpoon the lucas. The lucas is unshod. If the tracey is notable then the tracey reecho the lucas. If something reecho the lucas then it reecho the tracey. If something reecho the tracey then it is notable. The lucas is not unshod.", "logic": "\nReecho(tracey, lucas)\nHarpoon(tracey, lucas)\nUnshod(lucas)\nNotable(tracey) -> Reecho(tracey, lucas)\nforall x (Reecho(x, lucas) -> Reecho(x, tracey))\nforall x (Reecho(x, tracey) -> Notable(x))\n\nnot Unshod(lucas)\n\ntherefore Unshod(lucas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The else gobble the sonnnie. The else define the sonnnie. The sonnnie is unaccented. If the else is dopey then the else gobble the sonnnie. If something gobble the sonnnie then it gobble the else. If something gobble the else then it is dopey. The else gobble the else.", "logic": "\nGobble(else, sonnnie)\nDefine(else, sonnnie)\nUnaccented(sonnnie)\nDopey(else) -> Gobble(else, sonnnie)\nforall x (Gobble(x, sonnnie) -> Gobble(x, else))\nforall x (Gobble(x, else) -> Dopey(x))\n\nGobble(else, else)\n\nGobble(else, sonnnie) and forall x (Gobble(x, sonnnie) -> Gobble(x, else)) -> therefore Gobble(else, else)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The baron mistreat the phelia. The baron inactivate the phelia. The phelia is uncouth. If the baron is hale then the baron mistreat the phelia. If something mistreat the phelia then it mistreat the baron. If something mistreat the baron then it is hale. The baron does not eat the baron.", "logic": "\nMistreat(baron, phelia)\nInactivate(baron, phelia)\nUncouth(phelia)\nHale(baron) -> Mistreat(baron, phelia)\nforall x (Mistreat(x, phelia) -> Mistreat(x, baron))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, baron) -> Hale(x))\n\nnot Mistreat(baron, baron)\n\nMistreat(baron, phelia) and forall x (Mistreat(x, phelia) -> Mistreat(x, baron)) -> therefore Mistreat(baron, baron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The kevyn except the sheril. The kevyn reason the sheril. The sheril is dislocated. If the kevyn is adapted then the kevyn except the sheril. If something except the sheril then it except the kevyn. If something except the kevyn then it is adapted. The kevyn is adapted.", "logic": "\nExcept(kevyn, sheril)\nReason(kevyn, sheril)\nDislocated(sheril)\nAdapted(kevyn) -> Except(kevyn, sheril)\nforall x (Except(x, sheril) -> Except(x, kevyn))\nforall x (Except(x, kevyn) -> Adapted(x))\n\nAdapted(kevyn)\n\nExcept(kevyn, sheril) and forall x (Except(x, sheril) -> Except(x, kevyn)) -> therefore Except(kevyn, kevyn) Except(kevyn, kevyn) and forall x (Except(x, kevyn) -> Adapted(x)) -> therefore Adapted(kevyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The elyn dignify the love. The elyn yoke the love. The love is accordant. If the elyn is side then the elyn dignify the love. If something dignify the love then it dignify the elyn. If something dignify the elyn then it is side. The elyn is not side.", "logic": "\nDignify(elyn, love)\nYoke(elyn, love)\nAccordant(love)\nSide(elyn) -> Dignify(elyn, love)\nforall x (Dignify(x, love) -> Dignify(x, elyn))\nforall x (Dignify(x, elyn) -> Side(x))\n\nnot Side(elyn)\n\nDignify(elyn, love) and forall x (Dignify(x, love) -> Dignify(x, elyn)) -> therefore Dignify(elyn, elyn) Dignify(elyn, elyn) and forall x (Dignify(x, elyn) -> Side(x)) -> therefore Side(elyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The ruthi recall the patrik. The ruthi deodorize the patrik. The patrik is glimmery. If the ruthi is stately then the ruthi recall the patrik. If something recall the patrik then it recall the ruthi. If something recall the ruthi then it is stately. The patrik is not stately.", "logic": "\nRecall(ruthi, patrik)\nDeodorize(ruthi, patrik)\nGlimmery(patrik)\nStately(ruthi) -> Recall(ruthi, patrik)\nforall x (Recall(x, patrik) -> Recall(x, ruthi))\nforall x (Recall(x, ruthi) -> Stately(x))\n\nnot Stately(patrik)\n\nforall x (Recall(x, ruthi) -> Stately(x)) <- forall x (Recall(x, patrik) -> Recall(x, ruthi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The dorene amerce the tamara. The dorene gabble the tamara. The tamara is shipboard. If the dorene is cunning then the dorene amerce the tamara. If something amerce the tamara then it amerce the dorene. If something amerce the dorene then it is cunning. The tamara amerce the dorene.", "logic": "\nAmerce(dorene, tamara)\nGabble(dorene, tamara)\nShipboard(tamara)\nCunning(dorene) -> Amerce(dorene, tamara)\nforall x (Amerce(x, tamara) -> Amerce(x, dorene))\nforall x (Amerce(x, dorene) -> Cunning(x))\n\nAmerce(tamara, dorene)\n\nforall x (Amerce(x, tamara) -> Amerce(x, dorene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The sunny earth the nick. The sunny growl the nick. The nick is somatic. If the sunny is eternal then the sunny earth the nick. If something earth the nick then it earth the sunny. If something earth the sunny then it is eternal. The nick does not need the nick.", "logic": "\nEarth(sunny, nick)\nGrowl(sunny, nick)\nSomatic(nick)\nEternal(sunny) -> Earth(sunny, nick)\nforall x (Earth(x, nick) -> Earth(x, sunny))\nforall x (Earth(x, sunny) -> Eternal(x))\n\nnot Needs(nick, nick)\n\nnot Needs(nick, nick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The calla alleviate the garfield. The calla venesect the garfield. The garfield is alular. If the calla is fried then the calla alleviate the garfield. If something alleviate the garfield then it alleviate the calla. If something alleviate the calla then it is fried. The garfield is kind.", "logic": "\nAlleviate(calla, garfield)\nVenesect(calla, garfield)\nAlular(garfield)\nFried(calla) -> Alleviate(calla, garfield)\nforall x (Alleviate(x, garfield) -> Alleviate(x, calla))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, calla) -> Fried(x))\n\nKind(garfield)\n\nKind(garfield) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The prent discord the timmy. The prent pulse the timmy. The timmy is tubed. If the prent is capitate then the prent discord the timmy. If something discord the timmy then it discord the prent. If something discord the prent then it is capitate. The timmy does not need the prent.", "logic": "\nDiscord(prent, timmy)\nPulse(prent, timmy)\nTubed(timmy)\nCapitate(prent) -> Discord(prent, timmy)\nforall x (Discord(x, timmy) -> Discord(x, prent))\nforall x (Discord(x, prent) -> Capitate(x))\n\nnot Needs(timmy, prent)\n\nnot Needs(timmy, prent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "The sephira clock the kimberli. The sephira verify the kimberli. The kimberli is horary. If the sephira is ensiform then the sephira clock the kimberli. If something clock the kimberli then it clock the sephira. If something clock the sephira then it is ensiform. The kimberli verify the sephira.", "logic": "\nClock(sephira, kimberli)\nVerify(sephira, kimberli)\nHorary(kimberli)\nEnsiform(sephira) -> Clock(sephira, kimberli)\nforall x (Clock(x, kimberli) -> Clock(x, sephira))\nforall x (Clock(x, sephira) -> Ensiform(x))\n\nVerify(kimberli, sephira)\n\nVerify(kimberli, sephira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-395"} {"premises": "Sandy is undercover. Jorry is iambic. Kristine is rhomboid. All unabused things are heavenly. Big things are heavenly. If Sandy is heavenly then Sandy is undercover. Cold things are tolerant. All iambic things are unabused. If Sandy is rhomboid then Sandy is heavenly. All iambic things are tolerant. If Jorry is undercover then Jorry is buddhistic. Jorry is iambic.", "logic": "\nUndercover(sandy)\nIambic(jorry)\nRhomboid(kristine)\nforall x (Unabused(x) -> Heavenly(x))\nforall x (Undercover(x) -> Heavenly(x))\nHeavenly(sandy) -> Undercover(sandy)\nforall x (Rhomboid(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Unabused(x))\nRhomboid(sandy) -> Heavenly(sandy)\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nUndercover(jorry) -> Buddhistic(jorry)\n\nIambic(jorry)\n\ntherefore Iambic(jorry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Ruperta is araceous. Seymour is oviparous. Harmony is uncanny. All gamey things are pressing. Big things are pressing. If Ruperta is pressing then Ruperta is araceous. Cold things are disabled. All oviparous things are gamey. If Ruperta is uncanny then Ruperta is pressing. All oviparous things are disabled. If Seymour is araceous then Seymour is enteric. Ruperta is not araceous.", "logic": "\nAraceous(ruperta)\nOviparous(seymour)\nUncanny(harmony)\nforall x (Gamey(x) -> Pressing(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> Pressing(x))\nPressing(ruperta) -> Araceous(ruperta)\nforall x (Uncanny(x) -> Disabled(x))\nforall x (Oviparous(x) -> Gamey(x))\nUncanny(ruperta) -> Pressing(ruperta)\nforall x (Oviparous(x) -> Disabled(x))\nAraceous(seymour) -> Enteric(seymour)\n\nnot Araceous(ruperta)\n\ntherefore Araceous(ruperta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Dora is requisite. Mariska is stated. Holley is joint. All anaglyphic things are singhalese. Big things are singhalese. If Dora is singhalese then Dora is requisite. Cold things are planar. All stated things are anaglyphic. If Dora is joint then Dora is singhalese. All stated things are planar. If Mariska is requisite then Mariska is marly. Dora is singhalese.", "logic": "\nRequisite(dora)\nStated(mariska)\nJoint(holley)\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) -> Singhalese(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) -> Singhalese(x))\nSinghalese(dora) -> Requisite(dora)\nforall x (Joint(x) -> Planar(x))\nforall x (Stated(x) -> Anaglyphic(x))\nJoint(dora) -> Singhalese(dora)\nforall x (Stated(x) -> Planar(x))\nRequisite(mariska) -> Marly(mariska)\n\nSinghalese(dora)\n\nRequisite(dora) and forall x (Requisite(x) -> Singhalese(x)) -> therefore Singhalese(dora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Annamaria is nephritic. Conney is grayish. Forster is better. All profound things are coaxal. Big things are coaxal. If Annamaria is coaxal then Annamaria is nephritic. Cold things are misplaced. All grayish things are profound. If Annamaria is better then Annamaria is coaxal. All grayish things are misplaced. If Conney is nephritic then Conney is lateen. Conney is not profound.", "logic": "\nNephritic(annamaria)\nGrayish(conney)\nBetter(forster)\nforall x (Profound(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nCoaxal(annamaria) -> Nephritic(annamaria)\nforall x (Better(x) -> Misplaced(x))\nforall x (Grayish(x) -> Profound(x))\nBetter(annamaria) -> Coaxal(annamaria)\nforall x (Grayish(x) -> Misplaced(x))\nNephritic(conney) -> Lateen(conney)\n\nnot Profound(conney)\n\nGrayish(conney) and forall x (Grayish(x) -> Profound(x)) -> therefore Profound(conney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Giffard is bedded. Walter is centenary. Duane is abrupt. All dendritic things are spirited. Big things are spirited. If Giffard is spirited then Giffard is bedded. Cold things are unromantic. All centenary things are dendritic. If Giffard is abrupt then Giffard is spirited. All centenary things are unromantic. If Walter is bedded then Walter is horrible. Walter is spirited.", "logic": "\nBedded(giffard)\nCentenary(walter)\nAbrupt(duane)\nforall x (Dendritic(x) -> Spirited(x))\nforall x (Bedded(x) -> Spirited(x))\nSpirited(giffard) -> Bedded(giffard)\nforall x (Abrupt(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Centenary(x) -> Dendritic(x))\nAbrupt(giffard) -> Spirited(giffard)\nforall x (Centenary(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nBedded(walter) -> Horrible(walter)\n\nSpirited(walter)\n\nCentenary(walter) and forall x (Centenary(x) -> Dendritic(x)) -> therefore Dendritic(walter) Dendritic(walter) and forall x (Dendritic(x) -> Spirited(x)) -> therefore Spirited(walter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Dorothee is unimpaired. Lem is methodist. Malina is prognathic. All fulgid things are unsubtle. Big things are unsubtle. If Dorothee is unsubtle then Dorothee is unimpaired. Cold things are unhinged. All methodist things are fulgid. If Dorothee is prognathic then Dorothee is unsubtle. All methodist things are unhinged. If Lem is unimpaired then Lem is attractive. Lem is not unsubtle.", "logic": "\nUnimpaired(dorothee)\nMethodist(lem)\nPrognathic(malina)\nforall x (Fulgid(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\nUnsubtle(dorothee) -> Unimpaired(dorothee)\nforall x (Prognathic(x) -> Unhinged(x))\nforall x (Methodist(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nPrognathic(dorothee) -> Unsubtle(dorothee)\nforall x (Methodist(x) -> Unhinged(x))\nUnimpaired(lem) -> Attractive(lem)\n\nnot Unsubtle(lem)\n\nMethodist(lem) and forall x (Methodist(x) -> Fulgid(x)) -> therefore Fulgid(lem) Fulgid(lem) and forall x (Fulgid(x) -> Unsubtle(x)) -> therefore Unsubtle(lem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Rodi is unscathed. Noam is scrotal. Sarajane is myriad. All bounteous things are planetal. Big things are planetal. If Rodi is planetal then Rodi is unscathed. Cold things are judicious. All scrotal things are bounteous. If Rodi is myriad then Rodi is planetal. All scrotal things are judicious. If Noam is unscathed then Noam is recyclable. Sarajane is not bounteous.", "logic": "\nUnscathed(rodi)\nScrotal(noam)\nMyriad(sarajane)\nforall x (Bounteous(x) -> Planetal(x))\nforall x (Unscathed(x) -> Planetal(x))\nPlanetal(rodi) -> Unscathed(rodi)\nforall x (Myriad(x) -> Judicious(x))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> Bounteous(x))\nMyriad(rodi) -> Planetal(rodi)\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> Judicious(x))\nUnscathed(noam) -> Recyclable(noam)\n\nnot Bounteous(sarajane)\n\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> Bounteous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Aubry is patched. Bride is sunk. Maura is guiltless. All corporeal things are turbulent. Big things are turbulent. If Aubry is turbulent then Aubry is patched. Cold things are germicidal. All sunk things are corporeal. If Aubry is guiltless then Aubry is turbulent. All sunk things are germicidal. If Bride is patched then Bride is emended. Maura is turbulent.", "logic": "\nPatched(aubry)\nSunk(bride)\nGuiltless(maura)\nforall x (Corporeal(x) -> Turbulent(x))\nforall x (Patched(x) -> Turbulent(x))\nTurbulent(aubry) -> Patched(aubry)\nforall x (Guiltless(x) -> Germicidal(x))\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Corporeal(x))\nGuiltless(aubry) -> Turbulent(aubry)\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Germicidal(x))\nPatched(bride) -> Emended(bride)\n\nTurbulent(maura)\n\nforall x (Corporeal(x) -> Turbulent(x)) <- forall x (Sunk(x) -> Corporeal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Brendan is ruritanian. Marlene is surefooted. Quincey is underway. All ergodic things are neglected. Big things are neglected. If Brendan is neglected then Brendan is ruritanian. Cold things are nonviable. All surefooted things are ergodic. If Brendan is underway then Brendan is neglected. All surefooted things are nonviable. If Marlene is ruritanian then Marlene is auric. Brendan is not ergodic.", "logic": "\nRuritanian(brendan)\nSurefooted(marlene)\nUnderway(quincey)\nforall x (Ergodic(x) -> Neglected(x))\nforall x (Ruritanian(x) -> Neglected(x))\nNeglected(brendan) -> Ruritanian(brendan)\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Nonviable(x))\nforall x (Surefooted(x) -> Ergodic(x))\nUnderway(brendan) -> Neglected(brendan)\nforall x (Surefooted(x) -> Nonviable(x))\nRuritanian(marlene) -> Auric(marlene)\n\nnot Ergodic(brendan)\n\nforall x (Surefooted(x) -> Ergodic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Dusty is puffed. Orsola is astragalar. Gera is augean. All adducting things are allantoid. Big things are allantoid. If Dusty is allantoid then Dusty is puffed. Cold things are adenoid. All astragalar things are adducting. If Dusty is augean then Dusty is allantoid. All astragalar things are adenoid. If Orsola is puffed then Orsola is cephalopod. Gera is puffed.", "logic": "\nPuffed(dusty)\nAstragalar(orsola)\nAugean(gera)\nforall x (Adducting(x) -> Allantoid(x))\nforall x (Puffed(x) -> Allantoid(x))\nAllantoid(dusty) -> Puffed(dusty)\nforall x (Augean(x) -> Adenoid(x))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> Adducting(x))\nAugean(dusty) -> Allantoid(dusty)\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> Adenoid(x))\nPuffed(orsola) -> Cephalopod(orsola)\n\nPuffed(gera)\n\nPuffed(gera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Clayton is comose. Agnella is rampageous. Adolphus is rearing. All hastate things are brazilian. Big things are brazilian. If Clayton is brazilian then Clayton is comose. Cold things are ionic. All rampageous things are hastate. If Clayton is rearing then Clayton is brazilian. All rampageous things are ionic. If Agnella is comose then Agnella is overcast. Agnella is not rearing.", "logic": "\nComose(clayton)\nRampageous(agnella)\nRearing(adolphus)\nforall x (Hastate(x) -> Brazilian(x))\nforall x (Comose(x) -> Brazilian(x))\nBrazilian(clayton) -> Comose(clayton)\nforall x (Rearing(x) -> Ionic(x))\nforall x (Rampageous(x) -> Hastate(x))\nRearing(clayton) -> Brazilian(clayton)\nforall x (Rampageous(x) -> Ionic(x))\nComose(agnella) -> Overcast(agnella)\n\nnot Rearing(agnella)\n\nnot Rearing(agnella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Sherlock is thorough. Joana is collegial. Yaakov is juiceless. All divisible things are homogenous. Big things are homogenous. If Sherlock is homogenous then Sherlock is thorough. Cold things are aground. All collegial things are divisible. If Sherlock is juiceless then Sherlock is homogenous. All collegial things are aground. If Joana is thorough then Joana is refined. Yaakov is collegial.", "logic": "\nThorough(sherlock)\nCollegial(joana)\nJuiceless(yaakov)\nforall x (Divisible(x) -> Homogenous(x))\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Homogenous(x))\nHomogenous(sherlock) -> Thorough(sherlock)\nforall x (Juiceless(x) -> Aground(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Divisible(x))\nJuiceless(sherlock) -> Homogenous(sherlock)\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Aground(x))\nThorough(joana) -> Refined(joana)\n\nCollegial(yaakov)\n\nCollegial(yaakov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1240"} {"premises": "Leland is moralistic. Germana is generous. Germana is doubled. White, nine things are fewest. All generous, moralistic things are augean. Nice things are moralistic. Germana is generous.", "logic": "\nMoralistic(leland)\nGenerous(germana)\nDoubled(germana)\nforall x (Doubled(x) and Nine(x) -> Fewest(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Augean(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) -> Moralistic(x))\n\nGenerous(germana)\n\ntherefore Generous(germana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Marcelo is expert. Adrea is incised. Adrea is colonic. White, earned things are deckled. All incised, expert things are atrophic. Nice things are expert. Marcelo is not expert.", "logic": "\nExpert(marcelo)\nIncised(adrea)\nColonic(adrea)\nforall x (Colonic(x) and Earned(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) and Expert(x) -> Atrophic(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) -> Expert(x))\n\nnot Expert(marcelo)\n\ntherefore Expert(marcelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Horst is depressing. Andria is hydrous. Andria is bouldered. White, allantoid things are frilled. All hydrous, depressing things are citywide. Nice things are depressing. Andria is depressing.", "logic": "\nDepressing(horst)\nHydrous(andria)\nBouldered(andria)\nforall x (Bouldered(x) and Allantoid(x) -> Frilled(x))\nforall x (Hydrous(x) and Depressing(x) -> Citywide(x))\nforall x (Hydrous(x) -> Depressing(x))\n\nDepressing(andria)\n\nHydrous(andria) and forall x (Hydrous(x) -> Depressing(x)) -> therefore Depressing(andria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Etta is spongelike. Nesta is prenatal. Nesta is aerobiotic. White, banal things are witty. All prenatal, spongelike things are mawkish. Nice things are spongelike. Nesta is not spongelike.", "logic": "\nSpongelike(etta)\nPrenatal(nesta)\nAerobiotic(nesta)\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) and Banal(x) -> Witty(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) -> Spongelike(x))\n\nnot Spongelike(nesta)\n\nPrenatal(nesta) and forall x (Prenatal(x) -> Spongelike(x)) -> therefore Spongelike(nesta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Devinne is unerring. Ignace is orbicular. Ignace is sweltry. White, hypertonic things are side. All orbicular, unerring things are mossy. Nice things are unerring. Ignace is mossy.", "logic": "\nUnerring(devinne)\nOrbicular(ignace)\nSweltry(ignace)\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Hypertonic(x) -> Side(x))\nforall x (Orbicular(x) and Unerring(x) -> Mossy(x))\nforall x (Orbicular(x) -> Unerring(x))\n\nMossy(ignace)\n\nOrbicular(ignace) and forall x (Orbicular(x) -> Unerring(x)) -> therefore Unerring(ignace) Orbicular(ignace) and Unerring(ignace) and forall x (Orbicular(x) and Unerring(x) -> Mossy(x)) -> therefore Mossy(ignace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Orly is diarrhoeic. Cherin is ignored. Cherin is idolatrous. White, primed things are uttered. All ignored, diarrhoeic things are altissimo. Nice things are diarrhoeic. Cherin is not altissimo.", "logic": "\nDiarrhoeic(orly)\nIgnored(cherin)\nIdolatrous(cherin)\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) and Primed(x) -> Uttered(x))\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Altissimo(x))\nforall x (Ignored(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\n\nnot Altissimo(cherin)\n\nIgnored(cherin) and forall x (Ignored(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x)) -> therefore Diarrhoeic(cherin) Ignored(cherin) and Diarrhoeic(cherin) and forall x (Ignored(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Altissimo(x)) -> therefore Altissimo(cherin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Audie is bone. Flinn is orgiastic. Flinn is ergotropic. White, creditable things are seventh. All orgiastic, bone things are purple. Nice things are bone. Audie is not purple.", "logic": "\nBone(audie)\nOrgiastic(flinn)\nErgotropic(flinn)\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) and Creditable(x) -> Seventh(x))\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) and Bone(x) -> Purple(x))\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Bone(x))\n\nnot Purple(audie)\n\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) and Bone(x) -> Purple(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Dionne is bicornate. Doti is cumulative. Doti is eponymic. White, undogmatic things are milkless. All cumulative, bicornate things are monastical. Nice things are bicornate. Dionne is milkless.", "logic": "\nBicornate(dionne)\nCumulative(doti)\nEponymic(doti)\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and Undogmatic(x) -> Milkless(x))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) and Bicornate(x) -> Monastical(x))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) -> Bicornate(x))\n\nMilkless(dionne)\n\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and Undogmatic(x) -> Milkless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Augustina is oneiric. Torey is unfirm. Torey is raging. White, unreactive things are advective. All unfirm, oneiric things are frail. Nice things are oneiric. Torey is not advective.", "logic": "\nOneiric(augustina)\nUnfirm(torey)\nRaging(torey)\nforall x (Raging(x) and Unreactive(x) -> Advective(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Oneiric(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Oneiric(x))\n\nnot Advective(torey)\n\nforall x (Raging(x) and Unreactive(x) -> Advective(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Veda is xxii. Tamiko is homosexual. Tamiko is former. White, unabused things are silken. All homosexual, xxii things are joking. Nice things are xxii. Veda is unabused.", "logic": "\nXxii(veda)\nHomosexual(tamiko)\nFormer(tamiko)\nforall x (Former(x) and Unabused(x) -> Silken(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Xxii(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Xxii(x))\n\nUnabused(veda)\n\nUnabused(veda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Charil is optical. Connie is unexciting. Connie is ungentle. White, solid things are squarish. All unexciting, optical things are blotchy. Nice things are optical. Connie is not kind.", "logic": "\nOptical(charil)\nUnexciting(connie)\nUngentle(connie)\nforall x (Ungentle(x) and Solid(x) -> Squarish(x))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and Optical(x) -> Blotchy(x))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) -> Optical(x))\n\nnot Kind(connie)\n\nnot Kind(connie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Katya is akin. Casie is creative. Casie is alaskan. White, incised things are berserk. All creative, akin things are irritable. Nice things are akin. Katya is alaskan.", "logic": "\nAkin(katya)\nCreative(casie)\nAlaskan(casie)\nforall x (Alaskan(x) and Incised(x) -> Berserk(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) and Akin(x) -> Irritable(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) -> Akin(x))\n\nAlaskan(katya)\n\nAlaskan(katya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2376"} {"premises": "Rhea is dyslexic. Rhea is edentulate. Gilburt is dyslexic. Gilburt is tough. Gilburt is transitory. Sarena is transitory. Kaila is dyslexic. All extinct people are rich. If someone is edentulate then they are extinct. Rhea is dyslexic.", "logic": "\nDyslexic(rhea)\nEdentulate(rhea)\nDyslexic(gilburt)\nTough(gilburt)\nTransitory(gilburt)\nTransitory(sarena)\nDyslexic(kaila)\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Rich(x))\nforall x (Edentulate(x) -> Extinct(x))\n\nDyslexic(rhea)\n\ntherefore Dyslexic(rhea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Henry is romaic. Henry is simplex. Claudette is romaic. Claudette is fleshy. Claudette is champleve. Richard is champleve. Benson is romaic. All jaggy people are antiphonal. If someone is simplex then they are jaggy. Richard is not champleve.", "logic": "\nRomaic(henry)\nSimplex(henry)\nRomaic(claudette)\nFleshy(claudette)\nChampleve(claudette)\nChampleve(richard)\nRomaic(benson)\nforall x (Jaggy(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nforall x (Simplex(x) -> Jaggy(x))\n\nnot Champleve(richard)\n\ntherefore Champleve(richard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Alta is climatic. Alta is nonfissile. Barbi is climatic. Barbi is carnation. Barbi is glittering. Aron is glittering. Chas is climatic. All forthright people are toroidal. If someone is nonfissile then they are forthright. Alta is forthright.", "logic": "\nClimatic(alta)\nNonfissile(alta)\nClimatic(barbi)\nCarnation(barbi)\nGlittering(barbi)\nGlittering(aron)\nClimatic(chas)\nforall x (Forthright(x) -> Toroidal(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Forthright(x))\n\nForthright(alta)\n\nNonfissile(alta) and forall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Forthright(x)) -> therefore Forthright(alta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Vivie is ravaged. Vivie is altricial. Lynette is ravaged. Lynette is leaved. Lynette is eponymic. Jervis is eponymic. Doti is ravaged. All neat people are basilican. If someone is altricial then they are neat. Vivie is not neat.", "logic": "\nRavaged(vivie)\nAltricial(vivie)\nRavaged(lynette)\nLeaved(lynette)\nEponymic(lynette)\nEponymic(jervis)\nRavaged(doti)\nforall x (Neat(x) -> Basilican(x))\nforall x (Altricial(x) -> Neat(x))\n\nnot Neat(vivie)\n\nAltricial(vivie) and forall x (Altricial(x) -> Neat(x)) -> therefore Neat(vivie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Clay is moire. Clay is unsuited. Leland is moire. Leland is enjoyable. Leland is discharged. Olia is discharged. Rozina is moire. All afebrile people are mercerized. If someone is unsuited then they are afebrile. Clay is mercerized.", "logic": "\nMoire(clay)\nUnsuited(clay)\nMoire(leland)\nEnjoyable(leland)\nDischarged(leland)\nDischarged(olia)\nMoire(rozina)\nforall x (Afebrile(x) -> Mercerized(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) -> Afebrile(x))\n\nMercerized(clay)\n\nUnsuited(clay) and forall x (Unsuited(x) -> Afebrile(x)) -> therefore Afebrile(clay) Afebrile(clay) and forall x (Afebrile(x) -> Mercerized(x)) -> therefore Mercerized(clay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Lurleen is streetwise. Lurleen is achy. Xylia is streetwise. Xylia is wound. Xylia is contained. Ignatius is contained. Don is streetwise. All stirring people are chunky. If someone is achy then they are stirring. Lurleen is not chunky.", "logic": "\nStreetwise(lurleen)\nAchy(lurleen)\nStreetwise(xylia)\nWound(xylia)\nContained(xylia)\nContained(ignatius)\nStreetwise(don)\nforall x (Stirring(x) -> Chunky(x))\nforall x (Achy(x) -> Stirring(x))\n\nnot Chunky(lurleen)\n\nAchy(lurleen) and forall x (Achy(x) -> Stirring(x)) -> therefore Stirring(lurleen) Stirring(lurleen) and forall x (Stirring(x) -> Chunky(x)) -> therefore Chunky(lurleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Glory is laudatory. Glory is catholic. Martainn is laudatory. Martainn is thorough. Martainn is adventive. Crawford is adventive. Orrin is laudatory. All projected people are forced. If someone is catholic then they are projected. Crawford is not forced.", "logic": "\nLaudatory(glory)\nCatholic(glory)\nLaudatory(martainn)\nThorough(martainn)\nAdventive(martainn)\nAdventive(crawford)\nLaudatory(orrin)\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Catholic(x) -> Projected(x))\n\nnot Forced(crawford)\n\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Forced(x)) <- forall x (Catholic(x) -> Projected(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Thor is owing. Thor is enured. Townie is owing. Townie is sensate. Townie is dismissed. Marcelo is dismissed. Peyton is owing. All beetling people are lithic. If someone is enured then they are beetling. Peyton is lithic.", "logic": "\nOwing(thor)\nEnured(thor)\nOwing(townie)\nSensate(townie)\nDismissed(townie)\nDismissed(marcelo)\nOwing(peyton)\nforall x (Beetling(x) -> Lithic(x))\nforall x (Enured(x) -> Beetling(x))\n\nLithic(peyton)\n\nforall x (Beetling(x) -> Lithic(x)) <- forall x (Enured(x) -> Beetling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Slim is horary. Slim is immutable. Candy is horary. Candy is raped. Candy is lithuanian. Jimmy is lithuanian. Milka is horary. All unturned people are sacral. If someone is immutable then they are unturned. Candy is not sacral.", "logic": "\nHorary(slim)\nImmutable(slim)\nHorary(candy)\nRaped(candy)\nLithuanian(candy)\nLithuanian(jimmy)\nHorary(milka)\nforall x (Unturned(x) -> Sacral(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Unturned(x))\n\nnot Sacral(candy)\n\nforall x (Unturned(x) -> Sacral(x)) <- forall x (Immutable(x) -> Unturned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Erl is hardy. Erl is vested. Marcelia is hardy. Marcelia is imbalanced. Marcelia is mucinoid. Alexandra is mucinoid. Jamie is hardy. All australian people are perianal. If someone is vested then they are australian. Alexandra is vested.", "logic": "\nHardy(erl)\nVested(erl)\nHardy(marcelia)\nImbalanced(marcelia)\nMucinoid(marcelia)\nMucinoid(alexandra)\nHardy(jamie)\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Perianal(x))\nforall x (Vested(x) -> Australian(x))\n\nVested(alexandra)\n\nVested(alexandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Trude is steadfast. Trude is monthlong. Agustin is steadfast. Agustin is undercover. Agustin is recognized. Madalyn is recognized. Dolli is steadfast. All pathless people are metal. If someone is monthlong then they are pathless. Madalyn is not undercover.", "logic": "\nSteadfast(trude)\nMonthlong(trude)\nSteadfast(agustin)\nUndercover(agustin)\nRecognized(agustin)\nRecognized(madalyn)\nSteadfast(dolli)\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> Metal(x))\nforall x (Monthlong(x) -> Pathless(x))\n\nnot Undercover(madalyn)\n\nnot Undercover(madalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Tyson is queasy. Tyson is shagged. Alida is queasy. Alida is unobvious. Alida is meaning. Myron is meaning. Teodorico is queasy. All midweekly people are reversed. If someone is shagged then they are midweekly. Tyson is unobvious.", "logic": "\nQueasy(tyson)\nShagged(tyson)\nQueasy(alida)\nUnobvious(alida)\nMeaning(alida)\nMeaning(myron)\nQueasy(teodorico)\nforall x (Midweekly(x) -> Reversed(x))\nforall x (Shagged(x) -> Midweekly(x))\n\nUnobvious(tyson)\n\nUnobvious(tyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-653"} {"premises": "Dannie is vagile. Dannie is dissonant. Dannie is hotheaded. Norah is vagile. Norah is dissonant. Berri is hotheaded. Berri is typic. Luella is swishy. Luella is vagile. Luella is dissonant. Luella is agrestic. Luella is typic. Round things are agrestic. If something is swishy then it is typic. Round things are vagile. If Luella is swishy and Luella is rotted then Luella is agrestic. If something is dissonant and agrestic then it is vagile. Green things are swishy. If something is hotheaded then it is dissonant. If Norah is vagile and Norah is rotted then Norah is dissonant. Luella is vagile.", "logic": "\nVagile(dannie)\nDissonant(dannie)\nHotheaded(dannie)\nVagile(norah)\nDissonant(norah)\nHotheaded(berri)\nTypic(berri)\nSwishy(luella)\nVagile(luella)\nDissonant(luella)\nAgrestic(luella)\nTypic(luella)\nforall x (Typic(x) -> Agrestic(x))\nforall x (Swishy(x) -> Typic(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) -> Vagile(x))\nSwishy(luella) and Rotted(luella) -> Agrestic(luella)\nforall x (Dissonant(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Vagile(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) -> Swishy(x))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nVagile(norah) and Rotted(norah) -> Dissonant(norah)\n\nVagile(luella)\n\ntherefore Vagile(luella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Odysseus is mortified. Odysseus is amerciable. Odysseus is cupular. Dacey is mortified. Dacey is amerciable. Deanna is cupular. Deanna is endemical. Gabriel is brachial. Gabriel is mortified. Gabriel is amerciable. Gabriel is scant. Gabriel is endemical. Round things are scant. If something is brachial then it is endemical. Round things are mortified. If Gabriel is brachial and Gabriel is warm then Gabriel is scant. If something is amerciable and scant then it is mortified. Green things are brachial. If something is cupular then it is amerciable. If Dacey is mortified and Dacey is warm then Dacey is amerciable. Gabriel is not scant.", "logic": "\nMortified(odysseus)\nAmerciable(odysseus)\nCupular(odysseus)\nMortified(dacey)\nAmerciable(dacey)\nCupular(deanna)\nEndemical(deanna)\nBrachial(gabriel)\nMortified(gabriel)\nAmerciable(gabriel)\nScant(gabriel)\nEndemical(gabriel)\nforall x (Endemical(x) -> Scant(x))\nforall x (Brachial(x) -> Endemical(x))\nforall x (Endemical(x) -> Mortified(x))\nBrachial(gabriel) and Warm(gabriel) -> Scant(gabriel)\nforall x (Amerciable(x) and Scant(x) -> Mortified(x))\nforall x (Mortified(x) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> Amerciable(x))\nMortified(dacey) and Warm(dacey) -> Amerciable(dacey)\n\nnot Scant(gabriel)\n\ntherefore Scant(gabriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Towney is dictated. Towney is thankless. Towney is longhand. Sharia is dictated. Sharia is thankless. Gaspar is longhand. Gaspar is wifely. Jody is positional. Jody is dictated. Jody is thankless. Jody is malapropos. Jody is wifely. Round things are malapropos. If something is positional then it is wifely. Round things are dictated. If Jody is positional and Jody is tamil then Jody is malapropos. If something is thankless and malapropos then it is dictated. Green things are positional. If something is longhand then it is thankless. If Sharia is dictated and Sharia is tamil then Sharia is thankless. Towney is positional.", "logic": "\nDictated(towney)\nThankless(towney)\nLonghand(towney)\nDictated(sharia)\nThankless(sharia)\nLonghand(gaspar)\nWifely(gaspar)\nPositional(jody)\nDictated(jody)\nThankless(jody)\nMalapropos(jody)\nWifely(jody)\nforall x (Wifely(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Positional(x) -> Wifely(x))\nforall x (Wifely(x) -> Dictated(x))\nPositional(jody) and Tamil(jody) -> Malapropos(jody)\nforall x (Thankless(x) and Malapropos(x) -> Dictated(x))\nforall x (Dictated(x) -> Positional(x))\nforall x (Longhand(x) -> Thankless(x))\nDictated(sharia) and Tamil(sharia) -> Thankless(sharia)\n\nPositional(towney)\n\nDictated(towney) and forall x (Dictated(x) -> Positional(x)) -> therefore Positional(towney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Stormy is cloisonne. Stormy is brocaded. Stormy is lidless. Moss is cloisonne. Moss is brocaded. Garrot is lidless. Garrot is insincere. Maxfield is harmless. Maxfield is cloisonne. Maxfield is brocaded. Maxfield is innovative. Maxfield is insincere. Round things are innovative. If something is harmless then it is insincere. Round things are cloisonne. If Maxfield is harmless and Maxfield is uricosuric then Maxfield is innovative. If something is brocaded and innovative then it is cloisonne. Green things are harmless. If something is lidless then it is brocaded. If Moss is cloisonne and Moss is uricosuric then Moss is brocaded. Garrot is not cloisonne.", "logic": "\nCloisonne(stormy)\nBrocaded(stormy)\nLidless(stormy)\nCloisonne(moss)\nBrocaded(moss)\nLidless(garrot)\nInsincere(garrot)\nHarmless(maxfield)\nCloisonne(maxfield)\nBrocaded(maxfield)\nInnovative(maxfield)\nInsincere(maxfield)\nforall x (Insincere(x) -> Innovative(x))\nforall x (Harmless(x) -> Insincere(x))\nforall x (Insincere(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\nHarmless(maxfield) and Uricosuric(maxfield) -> Innovative(maxfield)\nforall x (Brocaded(x) and Innovative(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Harmless(x))\nforall x (Lidless(x) -> Brocaded(x))\nCloisonne(moss) and Uricosuric(moss) -> Brocaded(moss)\n\nnot Cloisonne(garrot)\n\nInsincere(garrot) and forall x (Insincere(x) -> Cloisonne(x)) -> therefore Cloisonne(garrot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Vivien is petulant. Vivien is cypriot. Vivien is venturous. Lotty is petulant. Lotty is cypriot. Genevra is venturous. Genevra is surface. Esmaria is closed. Esmaria is petulant. Esmaria is cypriot. Esmaria is unwise. Esmaria is surface. Round things are unwise. If something is closed then it is surface. Round things are petulant. If Esmaria is closed and Esmaria is adulatory then Esmaria is unwise. If something is cypriot and unwise then it is petulant. Green things are closed. If something is venturous then it is cypriot. If Lotty is petulant and Lotty is adulatory then Lotty is cypriot. Genevra is closed.", "logic": "\nPetulant(vivien)\nCypriot(vivien)\nVenturous(vivien)\nPetulant(lotty)\nCypriot(lotty)\nVenturous(genevra)\nSurface(genevra)\nClosed(esmaria)\nPetulant(esmaria)\nCypriot(esmaria)\nUnwise(esmaria)\nSurface(esmaria)\nforall x (Surface(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Surface(x))\nforall x (Surface(x) -> Petulant(x))\nClosed(esmaria) and Adulatory(esmaria) -> Unwise(esmaria)\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and Unwise(x) -> Petulant(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Closed(x))\nforall x (Venturous(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nPetulant(lotty) and Adulatory(lotty) -> Cypriot(lotty)\n\nClosed(genevra)\n\nSurface(genevra) and forall x (Surface(x) -> Petulant(x)) -> therefore Petulant(genevra) Petulant(genevra) and forall x (Petulant(x) -> Closed(x)) -> therefore Closed(genevra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Bishop is wraithlike. Bishop is argent. Bishop is lucky. Pamella is wraithlike. Pamella is argent. Rafaelia is lucky. Rafaelia is amino. Mada is arminian. Mada is wraithlike. Mada is argent. Mada is plebeian. Mada is amino. Round things are plebeian. If something is arminian then it is amino. Round things are wraithlike. If Mada is arminian and Mada is fallen then Mada is plebeian. If something is argent and plebeian then it is wraithlike. Green things are arminian. If something is lucky then it is argent. If Pamella is wraithlike and Pamella is fallen then Pamella is argent. Pamella is not amino.", "logic": "\nWraithlike(bishop)\nArgent(bishop)\nLucky(bishop)\nWraithlike(pamella)\nArgent(pamella)\nLucky(rafaelia)\nAmino(rafaelia)\nArminian(mada)\nWraithlike(mada)\nArgent(mada)\nPlebeian(mada)\nAmino(mada)\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Plebeian(x))\nforall x (Arminian(x) -> Amino(x))\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\nArminian(mada) and Fallen(mada) -> Plebeian(mada)\nforall x (Argent(x) and Plebeian(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) -> Arminian(x))\nforall x (Lucky(x) -> Argent(x))\nWraithlike(pamella) and Fallen(pamella) -> Argent(pamella)\n\nnot Amino(pamella)\n\nWraithlike(pamella) and forall x (Wraithlike(x) -> Arminian(x)) -> therefore Arminian(pamella) Arminian(pamella) and forall x (Arminian(x) -> Amino(x)) -> therefore Amino(pamella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Sibyl is unedited. Sibyl is busted. Sibyl is vagal. Claudie is unedited. Claudie is busted. Myrtle is vagal. Myrtle is offensive. Sandie is very. Sandie is unedited. Sandie is busted. Sandie is lacustrine. Sandie is offensive. Round things are lacustrine. If something is very then it is offensive. Round things are unedited. If Sandie is very and Sandie is abiding then Sandie is lacustrine. If something is busted and lacustrine then it is unedited. Green things are very. If something is vagal then it is busted. If Claudie is unedited and Claudie is abiding then Claudie is busted. Claudie is not abiding.", "logic": "\nUnedited(sibyl)\nBusted(sibyl)\nVagal(sibyl)\nUnedited(claudie)\nBusted(claudie)\nVagal(myrtle)\nOffensive(myrtle)\nVery(sandie)\nUnedited(sandie)\nBusted(sandie)\nLacustrine(sandie)\nOffensive(sandie)\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Lacustrine(x))\nforall x (Very(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Unedited(x))\nVery(sandie) and Abiding(sandie) -> Lacustrine(sandie)\nforall x (Busted(x) and Lacustrine(x) -> Unedited(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) -> Very(x))\nforall x (Vagal(x) -> Busted(x))\nUnedited(claudie) and Abiding(claudie) -> Busted(claudie)\n\nnot Abiding(claudie)\n\nnot Abiding(claudie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Tilly is minimized. Tilly is hoofed. Tilly is gritty. Melodie is minimized. Melodie is hoofed. Sophia is gritty. Sophia is lofty. Lurlene is unjust. Lurlene is minimized. Lurlene is hoofed. Lurlene is aboulic. Lurlene is lofty. Round things are aboulic. If something is unjust then it is lofty. Round things are minimized. If Lurlene is unjust and Lurlene is dendroid then Lurlene is aboulic. If something is hoofed and aboulic then it is minimized. Green things are unjust. If something is gritty then it is hoofed. If Melodie is minimized and Melodie is dendroid then Melodie is hoofed. Melodie is gritty.", "logic": "\nMinimized(tilly)\nHoofed(tilly)\nGritty(tilly)\nMinimized(melodie)\nHoofed(melodie)\nGritty(sophia)\nLofty(sophia)\nUnjust(lurlene)\nMinimized(lurlene)\nHoofed(lurlene)\nAboulic(lurlene)\nLofty(lurlene)\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Lofty(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Minimized(x))\nUnjust(lurlene) and Dendroid(lurlene) -> Aboulic(lurlene)\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Aboulic(x) -> Minimized(x))\nforall x (Minimized(x) -> Unjust(x))\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Hoofed(x))\nMinimized(melodie) and Dendroid(melodie) -> Hoofed(melodie)\n\nGritty(melodie)\n\nGritty(melodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Aurelia is wintry. Aurelia is turbulent. Aurelia is each. Reba is wintry. Reba is turbulent. George is each. George is unenviable. Josephus is scrivened. Josephus is wintry. Josephus is turbulent. Josephus is extrinsic. Josephus is unenviable. Round things are extrinsic. If something is scrivened then it is unenviable. Round things are wintry. If Josephus is scrivened and Josephus is empowered then Josephus is extrinsic. If something is turbulent and extrinsic then it is wintry. Green things are scrivened. If something is each then it is turbulent. If Reba is wintry and Reba is empowered then Reba is turbulent. Josephus is not empowered.", "logic": "\nWintry(aurelia)\nTurbulent(aurelia)\nEach(aurelia)\nWintry(reba)\nTurbulent(reba)\nEach(george)\nUnenviable(george)\nScrivened(josephus)\nWintry(josephus)\nTurbulent(josephus)\nExtrinsic(josephus)\nUnenviable(josephus)\nforall x (Unenviable(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Unenviable(x))\nforall x (Unenviable(x) -> Wintry(x))\nScrivened(josephus) and Empowered(josephus) -> Extrinsic(josephus)\nforall x (Turbulent(x) and Extrinsic(x) -> Wintry(x))\nforall x (Wintry(x) -> Scrivened(x))\nforall x (Each(x) -> Turbulent(x))\nWintry(reba) and Empowered(reba) -> Turbulent(reba)\n\nnot Empowered(josephus)\n\nnot Empowered(josephus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Michele is impressed. Michele is contrived. Michele is jungly. Mariam is impressed. Mariam is contrived. Otto is jungly. Otto is abject. Viv is chaldee. Viv is impressed. Viv is contrived. Viv is awnless. Viv is abject. Round things are awnless. If something is chaldee then it is abject. Round things are impressed. If Viv is chaldee and Viv is vehement then Viv is awnless. If something is contrived and awnless then it is impressed. Green things are chaldee. If something is jungly then it is contrived. If Mariam is impressed and Mariam is vehement then Mariam is contrived. Viv is jungly.", "logic": "\nImpressed(michele)\nContrived(michele)\nJungly(michele)\nImpressed(mariam)\nContrived(mariam)\nJungly(otto)\nAbject(otto)\nChaldee(viv)\nImpressed(viv)\nContrived(viv)\nAwnless(viv)\nAbject(viv)\nforall x (Abject(x) -> Awnless(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Abject(x))\nforall x (Abject(x) -> Impressed(x))\nChaldee(viv) and Vehement(viv) -> Awnless(viv)\nforall x (Contrived(x) and Awnless(x) -> Impressed(x))\nforall x (Impressed(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Contrived(x))\nImpressed(mariam) and Vehement(mariam) -> Contrived(mariam)\n\nJungly(viv)\n\nJungly(viv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Grethel is guyanese. Grethel is membranous. Grethel is slimed. Nona is guyanese. Nona is membranous. Cordelie is slimed. Cordelie is honorary. Brook is beholden. Brook is guyanese. Brook is membranous. Brook is cylindric. Brook is honorary. Round things are cylindric. If something is beholden then it is honorary. Round things are guyanese. If Brook is beholden and Brook is lxxii then Brook is cylindric. If something is membranous and cylindric then it is guyanese. Green things are beholden. If something is slimed then it is membranous. If Nona is guyanese and Nona is lxxii then Nona is membranous. Grethel is not lxxii.", "logic": "\nGuyanese(grethel)\nMembranous(grethel)\nSlimed(grethel)\nGuyanese(nona)\nMembranous(nona)\nSlimed(cordelie)\nHonorary(cordelie)\nBeholden(brook)\nGuyanese(brook)\nMembranous(brook)\nCylindric(brook)\nHonorary(brook)\nforall x (Honorary(x) -> Cylindric(x))\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> Honorary(x))\nforall x (Honorary(x) -> Guyanese(x))\nBeholden(brook) and Lxxii(brook) -> Cylindric(brook)\nforall x (Membranous(x) and Cylindric(x) -> Guyanese(x))\nforall x (Guyanese(x) -> Beholden(x))\nforall x (Slimed(x) -> Membranous(x))\nGuyanese(nona) and Lxxii(nona) -> Membranous(nona)\n\nnot Lxxii(grethel)\n\nnot Lxxii(grethel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Hewe is unthought. Hewe is nethermost. Hewe is cleared. Kristina is unthought. Kristina is nethermost. Heide is cleared. Heide is foster. Shepard is flaxen. Shepard is unthought. Shepard is nethermost. Shepard is drifting. Shepard is foster. Round things are drifting. If something is flaxen then it is foster. Round things are unthought. If Shepard is flaxen and Shepard is anestrous then Shepard is drifting. If something is nethermost and drifting then it is unthought. Green things are flaxen. If something is cleared then it is nethermost. If Kristina is unthought and Kristina is anestrous then Kristina is nethermost. Heide is anestrous.", "logic": "\nUnthought(hewe)\nNethermost(hewe)\nCleared(hewe)\nUnthought(kristina)\nNethermost(kristina)\nCleared(heide)\nFoster(heide)\nFlaxen(shepard)\nUnthought(shepard)\nNethermost(shepard)\nDrifting(shepard)\nFoster(shepard)\nforall x (Foster(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) -> Unthought(x))\nFlaxen(shepard) and Anestrous(shepard) -> Drifting(shepard)\nforall x (Nethermost(x) and Drifting(x) -> Unthought(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Cleared(x) -> Nethermost(x))\nUnthought(kristina) and Anestrous(kristina) -> Nethermost(kristina)\n\nAnestrous(heide)\n\nAnestrous(heide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2163"} {"premises": "Mendel is not soundless. Elwina is freakish. All freakish people are soundless. If someone is freakish and not amalgamate then they are dumb. All soundless people are allocable. Mendel is not soundless.", "logic": "\nnot Soundless(mendel)\nFreakish(elwina)\nforall x (Freakish(x) -> Soundless(x))\nforall x (Freakish(x) and not Amalgamate(x) -> Dumb(x))\nforall x (Soundless(x) -> Allocable(x))\n\nnot Soundless(mendel)\n\ntherefore not Soundless(mendel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Norman is not candied. Mariellen is corned. All corned people are candied. If someone is corned and not islamic then they are confiscate. All candied people are haploid. Norman is candied.", "logic": "\nnot Candied(norman)\nCorned(mariellen)\nforall x (Corned(x) -> Candied(x))\nforall x (Corned(x) and not Islamic(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nforall x (Candied(x) -> Haploid(x))\n\nCandied(norman)\n\ntherefore not Candied(norman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Madlen is not reinforced. Davita is eucaryotic. All eucaryotic people are reinforced. If someone is eucaryotic and not bridgeable then they are inflected. All reinforced people are solo. Davita is reinforced.", "logic": "\nnot Reinforced(madlen)\nEucaryotic(davita)\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) and not Bridgeable(x) -> Inflected(x))\nforall x (Reinforced(x) -> Solo(x))\n\nReinforced(davita)\n\nEucaryotic(davita) and forall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Reinforced(x)) -> therefore Reinforced(davita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Noach is not femoral. Fonsie is ambitious. All ambitious people are femoral. If someone is ambitious and not visaged then they are filipino. All femoral people are consistent. Fonsie is not femoral.", "logic": "\nnot Femoral(noach)\nAmbitious(fonsie)\nforall x (Ambitious(x) -> Femoral(x))\nforall x (Ambitious(x) and not Visaged(x) -> Filipino(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Consistent(x))\n\nnot Femoral(fonsie)\n\nAmbitious(fonsie) and forall x (Ambitious(x) -> Femoral(x)) -> therefore Femoral(fonsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Milly is not effected. Martainn is logy. All logy people are effected. If someone is logy and not affable then they are hydrous. All effected people are tannic. Martainn is tannic.", "logic": "\nnot Effected(milly)\nLogy(martainn)\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Effected(x))\nforall x (Logy(x) and not Affable(x) -> Hydrous(x))\nforall x (Effected(x) -> Tannic(x))\n\nTannic(martainn)\n\nLogy(martainn) and forall x (Logy(x) -> Effected(x)) -> therefore Effected(martainn) Effected(martainn) and forall x (Effected(x) -> Tannic(x)) -> therefore Tannic(martainn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Theda is not erosive. Angelita is papal. All papal people are erosive. If someone is papal and not xciv then they are nonprofit. All erosive people are cuboid. Angelita is not cuboid.", "logic": "\nnot Erosive(theda)\nPapal(angelita)\nforall x (Papal(x) -> Erosive(x))\nforall x (Papal(x) and not Xciv(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Erosive(x) -> Cuboid(x))\n\nnot Cuboid(angelita)\n\nPapal(angelita) and forall x (Papal(x) -> Erosive(x)) -> therefore Erosive(angelita) Erosive(angelita) and forall x (Erosive(x) -> Cuboid(x)) -> therefore Cuboid(angelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Dede is not bridal. Wilfrid is worthful. All worthful people are bridal. If someone is worthful and not mingy then they are ridged. All bridal people are sacerdotal. Dede is not ridged.", "logic": "\nnot Bridal(dede)\nWorthful(wilfrid)\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> Bridal(x))\nforall x (Worthful(x) and not Mingy(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Bridal(x) -> Sacerdotal(x))\n\nnot Ridged(dede)\n\nforall x (Worthful(x) and not Mingy(x) -> Ridged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Iggie is not downscale. Harris is oleaginous. All oleaginous people are downscale. If someone is oleaginous and not cinnabar then they are lumpen. All downscale people are scrappy. Iggie is scrappy.", "logic": "\nnot Downscale(iggie)\nOleaginous(harris)\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Downscale(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and not Cinnabar(x) -> Lumpen(x))\nforall x (Downscale(x) -> Scrappy(x))\n\nScrappy(iggie)\n\nforall x (Downscale(x) -> Scrappy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Rubie is not refined. Nicola is endless. All endless people are refined. If someone is endless and not sunstruck then they are thinkable. All refined people are tireless. Nicola is not thinkable.", "logic": "\nnot Refined(rubie)\nEndless(nicola)\nforall x (Endless(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Endless(x) and not Sunstruck(x) -> Thinkable(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Tireless(x))\n\nnot Thinkable(nicola)\n\nforall x (Endless(x) and not Sunstruck(x) -> Thinkable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Nickie is not repulsive. Saree is yeatsian. All yeatsian people are repulsive. If someone is yeatsian and not overage then they are lossless. All repulsive people are jointed. Nickie is nice.", "logic": "\nnot Repulsive(nickie)\nYeatsian(saree)\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) -> Repulsive(x))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and not Overage(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) -> Jointed(x))\n\nNice(nickie)\n\nNice(nickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Bonny is not censorial. Giffie is signed. All signed people are censorial. If someone is signed and not fixed then they are curdled. All censorial people are yemeni. Bonny is not fixed.", "logic": "\nnot Censorial(bonny)\nSigned(giffie)\nforall x (Signed(x) -> Censorial(x))\nforall x (Signed(x) and not Fixed(x) -> Curdled(x))\nforall x (Censorial(x) -> Yemeni(x))\n\nnot Fixed(bonny)\n\nnot Fixed(bonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "Leonelle is not spicate. Nataline is unavenged. All unavenged people are spicate. If someone is unavenged and not titled then they are redemptory. All spicate people are infeasible. Leonelle is cold.", "logic": "\nnot Spicate(leonelle)\nUnavenged(nataline)\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> Spicate(x))\nforall x (Unavenged(x) and not Titled(x) -> Redemptory(x))\nforall x (Spicate(x) -> Infeasible(x))\n\nCold(leonelle)\n\nCold(leonelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1381"} {"premises": "The paulette land the annalena. The paulette is roan. The paulette stiffen the cobby. The annalena is ungainly. The annalena stiffen the paulette. The vanny stiffen the annalena. The vanny shipwreck the annalena. The cobby stiffen the annalena. The cobby shipwreck the paulette. The cobby does not visit the vanny. If someone land the annalena then they like the vanny. If someone land the vanny and the vanny land the annalena then the annalena does not eat the vanny. If someone land the cobby and the cobby is ungainly then they visit the annalena. If someone is lxvii and they visit the annalena then they visit the paulette. If someone shipwreck the cobby and the cobby is lxvii then the cobby is thousandth. If someone is roan and they like the vanny then they are lxvii. If someone is piddling and they like the cobby then the cobby is piddling. If the vanny shipwreck the annalena and the annalena is not ungainly then the vanny stiffen the annalena. The vanny stiffen the annalena.", "logic": "\nLand(paulette, annalena)\nRoan(paulette)\nStiffen(paulette, cobby)\nUngainly(annalena)\nStiffen(annalena, paulette)\nStiffen(vanny, annalena)\nShipwreck(vanny, annalena)\nStiffen(cobby, annalena)\nShipwreck(cobby, paulette)\nnot Shipwreck(cobby, vanny)\nforall x (Land(x, annalena) -> Stiffen(x, vanny))\nforall x (Land(x, vanny) and Land(vanny, annalena) -> not Land(annalena, vanny))\nforall x (Land(x, cobby) and Ungainly(cobby) -> Shipwreck(x, annalena))\nforall x (Lxvii(x) and Shipwreck(x, annalena) -> Shipwreck(x, paulette))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, cobby) and Lxvii(cobby) -> Thousandth(cobby))\nforall x (Roan(x) and Stiffen(x, vanny) -> Lxvii(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) and Stiffen(x, cobby) -> Piddling(cobby))\nShipwreck(vanny, annalena) and not Ungainly(annalena) -> Stiffen(vanny, annalena)\n\nStiffen(vanny, annalena)\n\ntherefore Stiffen(vanny, annalena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The shirley reproof the sandye. The shirley is collinear. The shirley commit the doyle. The sandye is dense. The sandye commit the shirley. The juliet commit the sandye. The juliet cadge the sandye. The doyle commit the sandye. The doyle cadge the shirley. The doyle does not visit the juliet. If someone reproof the sandye then they like the juliet. If someone reproof the juliet and the juliet reproof the sandye then the sandye does not eat the juliet. If someone reproof the doyle and the doyle is dense then they visit the sandye. If someone is burlesque and they visit the sandye then they visit the shirley. If someone cadge the doyle and the doyle is burlesque then the doyle is phyllodial. If someone is collinear and they like the juliet then they are burlesque. If someone is impervious and they like the doyle then the doyle is impervious. If the juliet cadge the sandye and the sandye is not dense then the juliet commit the sandye. The doyle does not like the sandye.", "logic": "\nReproof(shirley, sandye)\nCollinear(shirley)\nCommit(shirley, doyle)\nDense(sandye)\nCommit(sandye, shirley)\nCommit(juliet, sandye)\nCadge(juliet, sandye)\nCommit(doyle, sandye)\nCadge(doyle, shirley)\nnot Cadge(doyle, juliet)\nforall x (Reproof(x, sandye) -> Commit(x, juliet))\nforall x (Reproof(x, juliet) and Reproof(juliet, sandye) -> not Reproof(sandye, juliet))\nforall x (Reproof(x, doyle) and Dense(doyle) -> Cadge(x, sandye))\nforall x (Burlesque(x) and Cadge(x, sandye) -> Cadge(x, shirley))\nforall x (Cadge(x, doyle) and Burlesque(doyle) -> Phyllodial(doyle))\nforall x (Collinear(x) and Commit(x, juliet) -> Burlesque(x))\nforall x (Impervious(x) and Commit(x, doyle) -> Impervious(doyle))\nCadge(juliet, sandye) and not Dense(sandye) -> Commit(juliet, sandye)\n\nnot Commit(doyle, sandye)\n\ntherefore Commit(doyle, sandye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The aloysia ripen the kathe. The aloysia is soured. The aloysia flag the stepha. The kathe is seasonal. The kathe flag the aloysia. The kissie flag the kathe. The kissie dovetail the kathe. The stepha flag the kathe. The stepha dovetail the aloysia. The stepha does not visit the kissie. If someone ripen the kathe then they like the kissie. If someone ripen the kissie and the kissie ripen the kathe then the kathe does not eat the kissie. If someone ripen the stepha and the stepha is seasonal then they visit the kathe. If someone is misbranded and they visit the kathe then they visit the aloysia. If someone dovetail the stepha and the stepha is misbranded then the stepha is relational. If someone is soured and they like the kissie then they are misbranded. If someone is meteoric and they like the stepha then the stepha is meteoric. If the kissie dovetail the kathe and the kathe is not seasonal then the kissie flag the kathe. The aloysia flag the kissie.", "logic": "\nRipen(aloysia, kathe)\nSoured(aloysia)\nFlag(aloysia, stepha)\nSeasonal(kathe)\nFlag(kathe, aloysia)\nFlag(kissie, kathe)\nDovetail(kissie, kathe)\nFlag(stepha, kathe)\nDovetail(stepha, aloysia)\nnot Dovetail(stepha, kissie)\nforall x (Ripen(x, kathe) -> Flag(x, kissie))\nforall x (Ripen(x, kissie) and Ripen(kissie, kathe) -> not Ripen(kathe, kissie))\nforall x (Ripen(x, stepha) and Seasonal(stepha) -> Dovetail(x, kathe))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) and Dovetail(x, kathe) -> Dovetail(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Dovetail(x, stepha) and Misbranded(stepha) -> Relational(stepha))\nforall x (Soured(x) and Flag(x, kissie) -> Misbranded(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) and Flag(x, stepha) -> Meteoric(stepha))\nDovetail(kissie, kathe) and not Seasonal(kathe) -> Flag(kissie, kathe)\n\nFlag(aloysia, kissie)\n\nRipen(aloysia, kathe) and forall x (Ripen(x, kathe) -> Flag(x, kissie)) -> therefore Flag(aloysia, kissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The novelia mill the zachery. The novelia is homiletic. The novelia broadside the ella. The zachery is nauseated. The zachery broadside the novelia. The cyrille broadside the zachery. The cyrille nicker the zachery. The ella broadside the zachery. The ella nicker the novelia. The ella does not visit the cyrille. If someone mill the zachery then they like the cyrille. If someone mill the cyrille and the cyrille mill the zachery then the zachery does not eat the cyrille. If someone mill the ella and the ella is nauseated then they visit the zachery. If someone is reticulate and they visit the zachery then they visit the novelia. If someone nicker the ella and the ella is reticulate then the ella is opthalmic. If someone is homiletic and they like the cyrille then they are reticulate. If someone is saxon and they like the ella then the ella is saxon. If the cyrille nicker the zachery and the zachery is not nauseated then the cyrille broadside the zachery. The novelia does not like the cyrille.", "logic": "\nMill(novelia, zachery)\nHomiletic(novelia)\nBroadside(novelia, ella)\nNauseated(zachery)\nBroadside(zachery, novelia)\nBroadside(cyrille, zachery)\nNicker(cyrille, zachery)\nBroadside(ella, zachery)\nNicker(ella, novelia)\nnot Nicker(ella, cyrille)\nforall x (Mill(x, zachery) -> Broadside(x, cyrille))\nforall x (Mill(x, cyrille) and Mill(cyrille, zachery) -> not Mill(zachery, cyrille))\nforall x (Mill(x, ella) and Nauseated(ella) -> Nicker(x, zachery))\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and Nicker(x, zachery) -> Nicker(x, novelia))\nforall x (Nicker(x, ella) and Reticulate(ella) -> Opthalmic(ella))\nforall x (Homiletic(x) and Broadside(x, cyrille) -> Reticulate(x))\nforall x (Saxon(x) and Broadside(x, ella) -> Saxon(ella))\nNicker(cyrille, zachery) and not Nauseated(zachery) -> Broadside(cyrille, zachery)\n\nnot Broadside(novelia, cyrille)\n\nMill(novelia, zachery) and forall x (Mill(x, zachery) -> Broadside(x, cyrille)) -> therefore Broadside(novelia, cyrille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The tani cone the jammie. The tani is handmade. The tani poultice the regine. The jammie is equipoised. The jammie poultice the tani. The pincus poultice the jammie. The pincus entice the jammie. The regine poultice the jammie. The regine entice the tani. The regine does not visit the pincus. If someone cone the jammie then they like the pincus. If someone cone the pincus and the pincus cone the jammie then the jammie does not eat the pincus. If someone cone the regine and the regine is equipoised then they visit the jammie. If someone is reportable and they visit the jammie then they visit the tani. If someone entice the regine and the regine is reportable then the regine is adjectival. If someone is handmade and they like the pincus then they are reportable. If someone is unoccupied and they like the regine then the regine is unoccupied. If the pincus entice the jammie and the jammie is not equipoised then the pincus poultice the jammie. The tani is reportable.", "logic": "\nCone(tani, jammie)\nHandmade(tani)\nPoultice(tani, regine)\nEquipoised(jammie)\nPoultice(jammie, tani)\nPoultice(pincus, jammie)\nEntice(pincus, jammie)\nPoultice(regine, jammie)\nEntice(regine, tani)\nnot Entice(regine, pincus)\nforall x (Cone(x, jammie) -> Poultice(x, pincus))\nforall x (Cone(x, pincus) and Cone(pincus, jammie) -> not Cone(jammie, pincus))\nforall x (Cone(x, regine) and Equipoised(regine) -> Entice(x, jammie))\nforall x (Reportable(x) and Entice(x, jammie) -> Entice(x, tani))\nforall x (Entice(x, regine) and Reportable(regine) -> Adjectival(regine))\nforall x (Handmade(x) and Poultice(x, pincus) -> Reportable(x))\nforall x (Unoccupied(x) and Poultice(x, regine) -> Unoccupied(regine))\nEntice(pincus, jammie) and not Equipoised(jammie) -> Poultice(pincus, jammie)\n\nReportable(tani)\n\nCone(tani, jammie) and forall x (Cone(x, jammie) -> Poultice(x, pincus)) -> therefore Poultice(tani, pincus) Handmade(tani) and Poultice(tani, pincus) and forall x (Handmade(x) and Poultice(x, pincus) -> Reportable(x)) -> therefore Reportable(tani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The sollie tend the gordon. The sollie is sure. The sollie savvy the mayor. The gordon is mandatory. The gordon savvy the sollie. The orlando savvy the gordon. The orlando discuss the gordon. The mayor savvy the gordon. The mayor discuss the sollie. The mayor does not visit the orlando. If someone tend the gordon then they like the orlando. If someone tend the orlando and the orlando tend the gordon then the gordon does not eat the orlando. If someone tend the mayor and the mayor is mandatory then they visit the gordon. If someone is exuvial and they visit the gordon then they visit the sollie. If someone discuss the mayor and the mayor is exuvial then the mayor is chalky. If someone is sure and they like the orlando then they are exuvial. If someone is serried and they like the mayor then the mayor is serried. If the orlando discuss the gordon and the gordon is not mandatory then the orlando savvy the gordon. The sollie is not exuvial.", "logic": "\nTend(sollie, gordon)\nSure(sollie)\nSavvy(sollie, mayor)\nMandatory(gordon)\nSavvy(gordon, sollie)\nSavvy(orlando, gordon)\nDiscuss(orlando, gordon)\nSavvy(mayor, gordon)\nDiscuss(mayor, sollie)\nnot Discuss(mayor, orlando)\nforall x (Tend(x, gordon) -> Savvy(x, orlando))\nforall x (Tend(x, orlando) and Tend(orlando, gordon) -> not Tend(gordon, orlando))\nforall x (Tend(x, mayor) and Mandatory(mayor) -> Discuss(x, gordon))\nforall x (Exuvial(x) and Discuss(x, gordon) -> Discuss(x, sollie))\nforall x (Discuss(x, mayor) and Exuvial(mayor) -> Chalky(mayor))\nforall x (Sure(x) and Savvy(x, orlando) -> Exuvial(x))\nforall x (Serried(x) and Savvy(x, mayor) -> Serried(mayor))\nDiscuss(orlando, gordon) and not Mandatory(gordon) -> Savvy(orlando, gordon)\n\nnot Exuvial(sollie)\n\nTend(sollie, gordon) and forall x (Tend(x, gordon) -> Savvy(x, orlando)) -> therefore Savvy(sollie, orlando) Sure(sollie) and Savvy(sollie, orlando) and forall x (Sure(x) and Savvy(x, orlando) -> Exuvial(x)) -> therefore Exuvial(sollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The marlena front the olympie. The marlena is blotched. The marlena halt the tad. The olympie is lubberly. The olympie halt the marlena. The donelle halt the olympie. The donelle coat the olympie. The tad halt the olympie. The tad coat the marlena. The tad does not visit the donelle. If someone front the olympie then they like the donelle. If someone front the donelle and the donelle front the olympie then the olympie does not eat the donelle. If someone front the tad and the tad is lubberly then they visit the olympie. If someone is backward and they visit the olympie then they visit the marlena. If someone coat the tad and the tad is backward then the tad is godless. If someone is blotched and they like the donelle then they are backward. If someone is hardbound and they like the tad then the tad is hardbound. If the donelle coat the olympie and the olympie is not lubberly then the donelle halt the olympie. The tad is not hardbound.", "logic": "\nFront(marlena, olympie)\nBlotched(marlena)\nHalt(marlena, tad)\nLubberly(olympie)\nHalt(olympie, marlena)\nHalt(donelle, olympie)\nCoat(donelle, olympie)\nHalt(tad, olympie)\nCoat(tad, marlena)\nnot Coat(tad, donelle)\nforall x (Front(x, olympie) -> Halt(x, donelle))\nforall x (Front(x, donelle) and Front(donelle, olympie) -> not Front(olympie, donelle))\nforall x (Front(x, tad) and Lubberly(tad) -> Coat(x, olympie))\nforall x (Backward(x) and Coat(x, olympie) -> Coat(x, marlena))\nforall x (Coat(x, tad) and Backward(tad) -> Godless(tad))\nforall x (Blotched(x) and Halt(x, donelle) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) and Halt(x, tad) -> Hardbound(tad))\nCoat(donelle, olympie) and not Lubberly(olympie) -> Halt(donelle, olympie)\n\nnot Hardbound(tad)\n\nforall x (Hardbound(x) and Halt(x, tad) -> Hardbound(tad)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The rolf hedge the marilu. The rolf is provincial. The rolf cloture the sissy. The marilu is sugared. The marilu cloture the rolf. The robinet cloture the marilu. The robinet clump the marilu. The sissy cloture the marilu. The sissy clump the rolf. The sissy does not visit the robinet. If someone hedge the marilu then they like the robinet. If someone hedge the robinet and the robinet hedge the marilu then the marilu does not eat the robinet. If someone hedge the sissy and the sissy is sugared then they visit the marilu. If someone is rightist and they visit the marilu then they visit the rolf. If someone clump the sissy and the sissy is rightist then the sissy is obsessed. If someone is provincial and they like the robinet then they are rightist. If someone is plain and they like the sissy then the sissy is plain. If the robinet clump the marilu and the marilu is not sugared then the robinet cloture the marilu. The rolf clump the marilu.", "logic": "\nHedge(rolf, marilu)\nProvincial(rolf)\nCloture(rolf, sissy)\nSugared(marilu)\nCloture(marilu, rolf)\nCloture(robinet, marilu)\nClump(robinet, marilu)\nCloture(sissy, marilu)\nClump(sissy, rolf)\nnot Clump(sissy, robinet)\nforall x (Hedge(x, marilu) -> Cloture(x, robinet))\nforall x (Hedge(x, robinet) and Hedge(robinet, marilu) -> not Hedge(marilu, robinet))\nforall x (Hedge(x, sissy) and Sugared(sissy) -> Clump(x, marilu))\nforall x (Rightist(x) and Clump(x, marilu) -> Clump(x, rolf))\nforall x (Clump(x, sissy) and Rightist(sissy) -> Obsessed(sissy))\nforall x (Provincial(x) and Cloture(x, robinet) -> Rightist(x))\nforall x (Plain(x) and Cloture(x, sissy) -> Plain(sissy))\nClump(robinet, marilu) and not Sugared(marilu) -> Cloture(robinet, marilu)\n\nClump(rolf, marilu)\n\nforall x (Hedge(x, sissy) and Sugared(sissy) -> Clump(x, marilu)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The felicle exult the mathew. The felicle is invidious. The felicle spud the silvia. The mathew is plausive. The mathew spud the felicle. The nathanil spud the mathew. The nathanil delude the mathew. The silvia spud the mathew. The silvia delude the felicle. The silvia does not visit the nathanil. If someone exult the mathew then they like the nathanil. If someone exult the nathanil and the nathanil exult the mathew then the mathew does not eat the nathanil. If someone exult the silvia and the silvia is plausive then they visit the mathew. If someone is upsetting and they visit the mathew then they visit the felicle. If someone delude the silvia and the silvia is upsetting then the silvia is procurable. If someone is invidious and they like the nathanil then they are upsetting. If someone is stenotic and they like the silvia then the silvia is stenotic. If the nathanil delude the mathew and the mathew is not plausive then the nathanil spud the mathew. The nathanil is not upsetting.", "logic": "\nExult(felicle, mathew)\nInvidious(felicle)\nSpud(felicle, silvia)\nPlausive(mathew)\nSpud(mathew, felicle)\nSpud(nathanil, mathew)\nDelude(nathanil, mathew)\nSpud(silvia, mathew)\nDelude(silvia, felicle)\nnot Delude(silvia, nathanil)\nforall x (Exult(x, mathew) -> Spud(x, nathanil))\nforall x (Exult(x, nathanil) and Exult(nathanil, mathew) -> not Exult(mathew, nathanil))\nforall x (Exult(x, silvia) and Plausive(silvia) -> Delude(x, mathew))\nforall x (Upsetting(x) and Delude(x, mathew) -> Delude(x, felicle))\nforall x (Delude(x, silvia) and Upsetting(silvia) -> Procurable(silvia))\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Spud(x, nathanil) -> Upsetting(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and Spud(x, silvia) -> Stenotic(silvia))\nDelude(nathanil, mathew) and not Plausive(mathew) -> Spud(nathanil, mathew)\n\nnot Upsetting(nathanil)\n\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Spud(x, nathanil) -> Upsetting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The candie haggle the lorita. The candie is buoyant. The candie commune the christy. The lorita is welfarist. The lorita commune the candie. The carlynne commune the lorita. The carlynne broom the lorita. The christy commune the lorita. The christy broom the candie. The christy does not visit the carlynne. If someone haggle the lorita then they like the carlynne. If someone haggle the carlynne and the carlynne haggle the lorita then the lorita does not eat the carlynne. If someone haggle the christy and the christy is welfarist then they visit the lorita. If someone is faucal and they visit the lorita then they visit the candie. If someone broom the christy and the christy is faucal then the christy is spaced. If someone is buoyant and they like the carlynne then they are faucal. If someone is commercial and they like the christy then the christy is commercial. If the carlynne broom the lorita and the lorita is not welfarist then the carlynne commune the lorita. The candie broom the christy.", "logic": "\nHaggle(candie, lorita)\nBuoyant(candie)\nCommune(candie, christy)\nWelfarist(lorita)\nCommune(lorita, candie)\nCommune(carlynne, lorita)\nBroom(carlynne, lorita)\nCommune(christy, lorita)\nBroom(christy, candie)\nnot Broom(christy, carlynne)\nforall x (Haggle(x, lorita) -> Commune(x, carlynne))\nforall x (Haggle(x, carlynne) and Haggle(carlynne, lorita) -> not Haggle(lorita, carlynne))\nforall x (Haggle(x, christy) and Welfarist(christy) -> Broom(x, lorita))\nforall x (Faucal(x) and Broom(x, lorita) -> Broom(x, candie))\nforall x (Broom(x, christy) and Faucal(christy) -> Spaced(christy))\nforall x (Buoyant(x) and Commune(x, carlynne) -> Faucal(x))\nforall x (Commercial(x) and Commune(x, christy) -> Commercial(christy))\nBroom(carlynne, lorita) and not Welfarist(lorita) -> Commune(carlynne, lorita)\n\nBroom(candie, christy)\n\nBroom(candie, christy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The yelena blame the elbert. The yelena is milch. The yelena blackleg the anselm. The elbert is higher. The elbert blackleg the yelena. The ripley blackleg the elbert. The ripley downsize the elbert. The anselm blackleg the elbert. The anselm downsize the yelena. The anselm does not visit the ripley. If someone blame the elbert then they like the ripley. If someone blame the ripley and the ripley blame the elbert then the elbert does not eat the ripley. If someone blame the anselm and the anselm is higher then they visit the elbert. If someone is vapourised and they visit the elbert then they visit the yelena. If someone downsize the anselm and the anselm is vapourised then the anselm is seminude. If someone is milch and they like the ripley then they are vapourised. If someone is insular and they like the anselm then the anselm is insular. If the ripley downsize the elbert and the elbert is not higher then the ripley blackleg the elbert. The yelena does not eat the anselm.", "logic": "\nBlame(yelena, elbert)\nMilch(yelena)\nBlackleg(yelena, anselm)\nHigher(elbert)\nBlackleg(elbert, yelena)\nBlackleg(ripley, elbert)\nDownsize(ripley, elbert)\nBlackleg(anselm, elbert)\nDownsize(anselm, yelena)\nnot Downsize(anselm, ripley)\nforall x (Blame(x, elbert) -> Blackleg(x, ripley))\nforall x (Blame(x, ripley) and Blame(ripley, elbert) -> not Blame(elbert, ripley))\nforall x (Blame(x, anselm) and Higher(anselm) -> Downsize(x, elbert))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Downsize(x, elbert) -> Downsize(x, yelena))\nforall x (Downsize(x, anselm) and Vapourised(anselm) -> Seminude(anselm))\nforall x (Milch(x) and Blackleg(x, ripley) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Insular(x) and Blackleg(x, anselm) -> Insular(anselm))\nDownsize(ripley, elbert) and not Higher(elbert) -> Blackleg(ripley, elbert)\n\nnot Blame(yelena, anselm)\n\nnot Blame(yelena, anselm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "The vasili skirt the florice. The vasili is grayish. The vasili sheet the zena. The florice is requisite. The florice sheet the vasili. The adela sheet the florice. The adela hotfoot the florice. The zena sheet the florice. The zena hotfoot the vasili. The zena does not visit the adela. If someone skirt the florice then they like the adela. If someone skirt the adela and the adela skirt the florice then the florice does not eat the adela. If someone skirt the zena and the zena is requisite then they visit the florice. If someone is unearthly and they visit the florice then they visit the vasili. If someone hotfoot the zena and the zena is unearthly then the zena is persuasive. If someone is grayish and they like the adela then they are unearthly. If someone is redeemable and they like the zena then the zena is redeemable. If the adela hotfoot the florice and the florice is not requisite then the adela sheet the florice. The florice is redeemable.", "logic": "\nSkirt(vasili, florice)\nGrayish(vasili)\nSheet(vasili, zena)\nRequisite(florice)\nSheet(florice, vasili)\nSheet(adela, florice)\nHotfoot(adela, florice)\nSheet(zena, florice)\nHotfoot(zena, vasili)\nnot Hotfoot(zena, adela)\nforall x (Skirt(x, florice) -> Sheet(x, adela))\nforall x (Skirt(x, adela) and Skirt(adela, florice) -> not Skirt(florice, adela))\nforall x (Skirt(x, zena) and Requisite(zena) -> Hotfoot(x, florice))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) and Hotfoot(x, florice) -> Hotfoot(x, vasili))\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, zena) and Unearthly(zena) -> Persuasive(zena))\nforall x (Grayish(x) and Sheet(x, adela) -> Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Redeemable(x) and Sheet(x, zena) -> Redeemable(zena))\nHotfoot(adela, florice) and not Requisite(florice) -> Sheet(adela, florice)\n\nRedeemable(florice)\n\nRedeemable(florice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1541"} {"premises": "Merralee is accusive. Ainslie is accusive. If something is accusive and cuneiform then it is songful. Green things are accusive. Kind things are redeeming. If something is nectarous and capacious then it is pakistani. If Ainslie is songful then Ainslie is cuneiform. All redeeming things are capacious. Nice things are cuneiform. If Merralee is capacious then Merralee is nectarous. Merralee is accusive.", "logic": "\nAccusive(merralee)\nAccusive(ainslie)\nforall x (Accusive(x) and Cuneiform(x) -> Songful(x))\nforall x (Songful(x) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Capacious(x) -> Redeeming(x))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) and Capacious(x) -> Pakistani(x))\nSongful(ainslie) -> Cuneiform(ainslie)\nforall x (Redeeming(x) -> Capacious(x))\nforall x (Accusive(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nCapacious(merralee) -> Nectarous(merralee)\n\nAccusive(merralee)\n\ntherefore Accusive(merralee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Brock is deadened. Carsten is deadened. If something is deadened and middling then it is pugilistic. Green things are deadened. Kind things are caducous. If something is inimical and aquiferous then it is unlittered. If Carsten is pugilistic then Carsten is middling. All caducous things are aquiferous. Nice things are middling. If Brock is aquiferous then Brock is inimical. Brock is not deadened.", "logic": "\nDeadened(brock)\nDeadened(carsten)\nforall x (Deadened(x) and Middling(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Deadened(x))\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Caducous(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Aquiferous(x) -> Unlittered(x))\nPugilistic(carsten) -> Middling(carsten)\nforall x (Caducous(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) -> Middling(x))\nAquiferous(brock) -> Inimical(brock)\n\nnot Deadened(brock)\n\ntherefore Deadened(brock)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Janith is unpackaged. Goldy is unpackaged. If something is unpackaged and vicinal then it is brimful. Green things are unpackaged. Kind things are untaped. If something is undoable and rakish then it is unassured. If Goldy is brimful then Goldy is vicinal. All untaped things are rakish. Nice things are vicinal. If Janith is rakish then Janith is undoable. Janith is vicinal.", "logic": "\nUnpackaged(janith)\nUnpackaged(goldy)\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) and Vicinal(x) -> Brimful(x))\nforall x (Brimful(x) -> Unpackaged(x))\nforall x (Rakish(x) -> Untaped(x))\nforall x (Undoable(x) and Rakish(x) -> Unassured(x))\nBrimful(goldy) -> Vicinal(goldy)\nforall x (Untaped(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Vicinal(x))\nRakish(janith) -> Undoable(janith)\n\nVicinal(janith)\n\nUnpackaged(janith) and forall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Vicinal(x)) -> therefore Vicinal(janith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Manfred is baric. Paton is baric. If something is baric and just then it is ghanian. Green things are baric. Kind things are flagitious. If something is primitive and quick then it is bifacial. If Paton is ghanian then Paton is just. All flagitious things are quick. Nice things are just. If Manfred is quick then Manfred is primitive. Manfred is not just.", "logic": "\nBaric(manfred)\nBaric(paton)\nforall x (Baric(x) and Just(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Baric(x))\nforall x (Quick(x) -> Flagitious(x))\nforall x (Primitive(x) and Quick(x) -> Bifacial(x))\nGhanian(paton) -> Just(paton)\nforall x (Flagitious(x) -> Quick(x))\nforall x (Baric(x) -> Just(x))\nQuick(manfred) -> Primitive(manfred)\n\nnot Just(manfred)\n\nBaric(manfred) and forall x (Baric(x) -> Just(x)) -> therefore Just(manfred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Odele is unemployed. Baron is unemployed. If something is unemployed and peaty then it is dewy. Green things are unemployed. Kind things are lessened. If something is hick and diluvial then it is neandertal. If Baron is dewy then Baron is peaty. All lessened things are diluvial. Nice things are peaty. If Odele is diluvial then Odele is hick. Baron is dewy.", "logic": "\nUnemployed(odele)\nUnemployed(baron)\nforall x (Unemployed(x) and Peaty(x) -> Dewy(x))\nforall x (Dewy(x) -> Unemployed(x))\nforall x (Diluvial(x) -> Lessened(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) and Diluvial(x) -> Neandertal(x))\nDewy(baron) -> Peaty(baron)\nforall x (Lessened(x) -> Diluvial(x))\nforall x (Unemployed(x) -> Peaty(x))\nDiluvial(odele) -> Hick(odele)\n\nDewy(baron)\n\nUnemployed(baron) and forall x (Unemployed(x) -> Peaty(x)) -> therefore Peaty(baron) Unemployed(baron) and Peaty(baron) and forall x (Unemployed(x) and Peaty(x) -> Dewy(x)) -> therefore Dewy(baron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Yoshiko is westmost. Sanders is westmost. If something is westmost and lineal then it is spastic. Green things are westmost. Kind things are frizzly. If something is bicolor and cystic then it is maximal. If Sanders is spastic then Sanders is lineal. All frizzly things are cystic. Nice things are lineal. If Yoshiko is cystic then Yoshiko is bicolor. Yoshiko is not spastic.", "logic": "\nWestmost(yoshiko)\nWestmost(sanders)\nforall x (Westmost(x) and Lineal(x) -> Spastic(x))\nforall x (Spastic(x) -> Westmost(x))\nforall x (Cystic(x) -> Frizzly(x))\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Cystic(x) -> Maximal(x))\nSpastic(sanders) -> Lineal(sanders)\nforall x (Frizzly(x) -> Cystic(x))\nforall x (Westmost(x) -> Lineal(x))\nCystic(yoshiko) -> Bicolor(yoshiko)\n\nnot Spastic(yoshiko)\n\nWestmost(yoshiko) and forall x (Westmost(x) -> Lineal(x)) -> therefore Lineal(yoshiko) Westmost(yoshiko) and Lineal(yoshiko) and forall x (Westmost(x) and Lineal(x) -> Spastic(x)) -> therefore Spastic(yoshiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Tudor is undepicted. Augusta is undepicted. If something is undepicted and mutual then it is proficient. Green things are undepicted. Kind things are flavorful. If something is twinkly and unhardened then it is unwritten. If Augusta is proficient then Augusta is mutual. All flavorful things are unhardened. Nice things are mutual. If Tudor is unhardened then Tudor is twinkly. Augusta is not flavorful.", "logic": "\nUndepicted(tudor)\nUndepicted(augusta)\nforall x (Undepicted(x) and Mutual(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Proficient(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Flavorful(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) and Unhardened(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nProficient(augusta) -> Mutual(augusta)\nforall x (Flavorful(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Undepicted(x) -> Mutual(x))\nUnhardened(tudor) -> Twinkly(tudor)\n\nnot Flavorful(augusta)\n\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Flavorful(x)) <- forall x (Flavorful(x) -> Unhardened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Fionnula is unsalted. Gilberte is unsalted. If something is unsalted and elusive then it is tatty. Green things are unsalted. Kind things are verbalized. If something is mettlesome and paperback then it is creepy. If Gilberte is tatty then Gilberte is elusive. All verbalized things are paperback. Nice things are elusive. If Fionnula is paperback then Fionnula is mettlesome. Fionnula is mettlesome.", "logic": "\nUnsalted(fionnula)\nUnsalted(gilberte)\nforall x (Unsalted(x) and Elusive(x) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) -> Unsalted(x))\nforall x (Paperback(x) -> Verbalized(x))\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) and Paperback(x) -> Creepy(x))\nTatty(gilberte) -> Elusive(gilberte)\nforall x (Verbalized(x) -> Paperback(x))\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> Elusive(x))\nPaperback(fionnula) -> Mettlesome(fionnula)\n\nMettlesome(fionnula)\n\nPaperback(fionnula) -> Mettlesome(fionnula) <- forall x (Verbalized(x) -> Paperback(x)) <- forall x (Paperback(x) -> Verbalized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Kristina is tenderized. Marquita is tenderized. If something is tenderized and anal then it is more. Green things are tenderized. Kind things are bemused. If something is realized and leibnizian then it is licked. If Marquita is more then Marquita is anal. All bemused things are leibnizian. Nice things are anal. If Kristina is leibnizian then Kristina is realized. Kristina is not leibnizian.", "logic": "\nTenderized(kristina)\nTenderized(marquita)\nforall x (Tenderized(x) and Anal(x) -> More(x))\nforall x (More(x) -> Tenderized(x))\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) -> Bemused(x))\nforall x (Realized(x) and Leibnizian(x) -> Licked(x))\nMore(marquita) -> Anal(marquita)\nforall x (Bemused(x) -> Leibnizian(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Anal(x))\nLeibnizian(kristina) -> Realized(kristina)\n\nnot Leibnizian(kristina)\n\nforall x (Bemused(x) -> Leibnizian(x)) <- forall x (Leibnizian(x) -> Bemused(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "Leonard is malawian. Ileane is malawian. If something is malawian and antsy then it is crusty. Green things are malawian. Kind things are peltate. If something is fungous and unmarked then it is exploded. If Ileane is crusty then Ileane is antsy. All peltate things are unmarked. Nice things are antsy. If Leonard is unmarked then Leonard is fungous. Ileane is fungous.", "logic": "\nMalawian(leonard)\nMalawian(ileane)\nforall x (Malawian(x) and Antsy(x) -> Crusty(x))\nforall x (Crusty(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Unmarked(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Fungous(x) and Unmarked(x) -> Exploded(x))\nCrusty(ileane) -> Antsy(ileane)\nforall x (Peltate(x) -> Unmarked(x))\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Antsy(x))\nUnmarked(leonard) -> Fungous(leonard)\n\nFungous(ileane)\n\nFungous(ileane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-502"} {"premises": "The silvie is bivalved. The silvie is arboreous. The silvie altercate the dosi. The silvie unwrap the dosi. The silvie unwrap the gustie. The silvie flyfish the dosi. The silvie flyfish the gustie. The dosi is avid. The dosi altercate the gustie. The dosi unwrap the gustie. The lisabeth is trackless. The lisabeth altercate the gustie. The lisabeth unwrap the gustie. The gustie is trackless. The gustie altercate the silvie. If the gustie altercate the silvie then the gustie unwrap the dosi. If something is arboreous then it flyfish the dosi. If something is avid then it altercate the lisabeth. If something altercate the silvie then it flyfish the lisabeth. If the silvie is bivalved then the silvie altercate the dosi. If something unwrap the lisabeth and the lisabeth is avid then the lisabeth unwrap the dosi. If something altercate the lisabeth then the lisabeth unwrap the silvie. If something flyfish the dosi and the dosi unwrap the lisabeth then the dosi unwrap the silvie. The lisabeth is trackless.", "logic": "\nBivalved(silvie)\nArboreous(silvie)\nAltercate(silvie, dosi)\nUnwrap(silvie, dosi)\nUnwrap(silvie, gustie)\nFlyfish(silvie, dosi)\nFlyfish(silvie, gustie)\nAvid(dosi)\nAltercate(dosi, gustie)\nUnwrap(dosi, gustie)\nTrackless(lisabeth)\nAltercate(lisabeth, gustie)\nUnwrap(lisabeth, gustie)\nTrackless(gustie)\nAltercate(gustie, silvie)\nAltercate(gustie, silvie) -> Unwrap(gustie, dosi)\nforall x (Arboreous(x) -> Flyfish(x, dosi))\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Altercate(x, lisabeth))\nforall x (Altercate(x, silvie) -> Flyfish(x, lisabeth))\nBivalved(silvie) -> Altercate(silvie, dosi)\nforall x (Unwrap(x, lisabeth) and Avid(lisabeth) -> Unwrap(lisabeth, dosi))\nforall x (Altercate(x, lisabeth) -> Unwrap(lisabeth, silvie))\nforall x (Flyfish(x, dosi) and Unwrap(dosi, lisabeth) -> Unwrap(dosi, silvie))\n\nTrackless(lisabeth)\n\ntherefore Trackless(lisabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The nevin is lanate. The nevin is weak. The nevin picnic the tyrus. The nevin pledge the tyrus. The nevin pledge the linnea. The nevin besiege the tyrus. The nevin besiege the linnea. The tyrus is orbitual. The tyrus picnic the linnea. The tyrus pledge the linnea. The portia is hermitical. The portia picnic the linnea. The portia pledge the linnea. The linnea is hermitical. The linnea picnic the nevin. If the linnea picnic the nevin then the linnea pledge the tyrus. If something is weak then it besiege the tyrus. If something is orbitual then it picnic the portia. If something picnic the nevin then it besiege the portia. If the nevin is lanate then the nevin picnic the tyrus. If something pledge the portia and the portia is orbitual then the portia pledge the tyrus. If something picnic the portia then the portia pledge the nevin. If something besiege the tyrus and the tyrus pledge the portia then the tyrus pledge the nevin. The nevin does not need the linnea.", "logic": "\nLanate(nevin)\nWeak(nevin)\nPicnic(nevin, tyrus)\nPledge(nevin, tyrus)\nPledge(nevin, linnea)\nBesiege(nevin, tyrus)\nBesiege(nevin, linnea)\nOrbitual(tyrus)\nPicnic(tyrus, linnea)\nPledge(tyrus, linnea)\nHermitical(portia)\nPicnic(portia, linnea)\nPledge(portia, linnea)\nHermitical(linnea)\nPicnic(linnea, nevin)\nPicnic(linnea, nevin) -> Pledge(linnea, tyrus)\nforall x (Weak(x) -> Besiege(x, tyrus))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Picnic(x, portia))\nforall x (Picnic(x, nevin) -> Besiege(x, portia))\nLanate(nevin) -> Picnic(nevin, tyrus)\nforall x (Pledge(x, portia) and Orbitual(portia) -> Pledge(portia, tyrus))\nforall x (Picnic(x, portia) -> Pledge(portia, nevin))\nforall x (Besiege(x, tyrus) and Pledge(tyrus, portia) -> Pledge(tyrus, nevin))\n\nnot Pledge(nevin, linnea)\n\ntherefore Pledge(nevin, linnea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The ansel is palladian. The ansel is unratable. The ansel thermostat the sandro. The ansel tucker the sandro. The ansel tucker the lucky. The ansel palaver the sandro. The ansel palaver the lucky. The sandro is ruly. The sandro thermostat the lucky. The sandro tucker the lucky. The desmond is furrowed. The desmond thermostat the lucky. The desmond tucker the lucky. The lucky is furrowed. The lucky thermostat the ansel. If the lucky thermostat the ansel then the lucky tucker the sandro. If something is unratable then it palaver the sandro. If something is ruly then it thermostat the desmond. If something thermostat the ansel then it palaver the desmond. If the ansel is palladian then the ansel thermostat the sandro. If something tucker the desmond and the desmond is ruly then the desmond tucker the sandro. If something thermostat the desmond then the desmond tucker the ansel. If something palaver the sandro and the sandro tucker the desmond then the sandro tucker the ansel. The sandro thermostat the desmond.", "logic": "\nPalladian(ansel)\nUnratable(ansel)\nThermostat(ansel, sandro)\nTucker(ansel, sandro)\nTucker(ansel, lucky)\nPalaver(ansel, sandro)\nPalaver(ansel, lucky)\nRuly(sandro)\nThermostat(sandro, lucky)\nTucker(sandro, lucky)\nFurrowed(desmond)\nThermostat(desmond, lucky)\nTucker(desmond, lucky)\nFurrowed(lucky)\nThermostat(lucky, ansel)\nThermostat(lucky, ansel) -> Tucker(lucky, sandro)\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Palaver(x, sandro))\nforall x (Ruly(x) -> Thermostat(x, desmond))\nforall x (Thermostat(x, ansel) -> Palaver(x, desmond))\nPalladian(ansel) -> Thermostat(ansel, sandro)\nforall x (Tucker(x, desmond) and Ruly(desmond) -> Tucker(desmond, sandro))\nforall x (Thermostat(x, desmond) -> Tucker(desmond, ansel))\nforall x (Palaver(x, sandro) and Tucker(sandro, desmond) -> Tucker(sandro, ansel))\n\nThermostat(sandro, desmond)\n\nRuly(sandro) and forall x (Ruly(x) -> Thermostat(x, desmond)) -> therefore Thermostat(sandro, desmond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The arly is prepacked. The arly is aspirant. The arly knap the antin. The arly twirl the antin. The arly twirl the shauna. The arly isomerise the antin. The arly isomerise the shauna. The antin is beautiful. The antin knap the shauna. The antin twirl the shauna. The tomiko is pulverized. The tomiko knap the shauna. The tomiko twirl the shauna. The shauna is pulverized. The shauna knap the arly. If the shauna knap the arly then the shauna twirl the antin. If something is aspirant then it isomerise the antin. If something is beautiful then it knap the tomiko. If something knap the arly then it isomerise the tomiko. If the arly is prepacked then the arly knap the antin. If something twirl the tomiko and the tomiko is beautiful then the tomiko twirl the antin. If something knap the tomiko then the tomiko twirl the arly. If something isomerise the antin and the antin twirl the tomiko then the antin twirl the arly. The shauna does not visit the tomiko.", "logic": "\nPrepacked(arly)\nAspirant(arly)\nKnap(arly, antin)\nTwirl(arly, antin)\nTwirl(arly, shauna)\nIsomerise(arly, antin)\nIsomerise(arly, shauna)\nBeautiful(antin)\nKnap(antin, shauna)\nTwirl(antin, shauna)\nPulverized(tomiko)\nKnap(tomiko, shauna)\nTwirl(tomiko, shauna)\nPulverized(shauna)\nKnap(shauna, arly)\nKnap(shauna, arly) -> Twirl(shauna, antin)\nforall x (Aspirant(x) -> Isomerise(x, antin))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Knap(x, tomiko))\nforall x (Knap(x, arly) -> Isomerise(x, tomiko))\nPrepacked(arly) -> Knap(arly, antin)\nforall x (Twirl(x, tomiko) and Beautiful(tomiko) -> Twirl(tomiko, antin))\nforall x (Knap(x, tomiko) -> Twirl(tomiko, arly))\nforall x (Isomerise(x, antin) and Twirl(antin, tomiko) -> Twirl(antin, arly))\n\nnot Isomerise(shauna, tomiko)\n\nKnap(shauna, arly) and forall x (Knap(x, arly) -> Isomerise(x, tomiko)) -> therefore Isomerise(shauna, tomiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The rosabelle is unified. The rosabelle is untypical. The rosabelle perceive the shepard. The rosabelle travesty the shepard. The rosabelle travesty the theodora. The rosabelle mend the shepard. The rosabelle mend the theodora. The shepard is vocalic. The shepard perceive the theodora. The shepard travesty the theodora. The cliff is scaphoid. The cliff perceive the theodora. The cliff travesty the theodora. The theodora is scaphoid. The theodora perceive the rosabelle. If the theodora perceive the rosabelle then the theodora travesty the shepard. If something is untypical then it mend the shepard. If something is vocalic then it perceive the cliff. If something perceive the rosabelle then it mend the cliff. If the rosabelle is unified then the rosabelle perceive the shepard. If something travesty the cliff and the cliff is vocalic then the cliff travesty the shepard. If something perceive the cliff then the cliff travesty the rosabelle. If something mend the shepard and the shepard travesty the cliff then the shepard travesty the rosabelle. The cliff travesty the rosabelle.", "logic": "\nUnified(rosabelle)\nUntypical(rosabelle)\nPerceive(rosabelle, shepard)\nTravesty(rosabelle, shepard)\nTravesty(rosabelle, theodora)\nMend(rosabelle, shepard)\nMend(rosabelle, theodora)\nVocalic(shepard)\nPerceive(shepard, theodora)\nTravesty(shepard, theodora)\nScaphoid(cliff)\nPerceive(cliff, theodora)\nTravesty(cliff, theodora)\nScaphoid(theodora)\nPerceive(theodora, rosabelle)\nPerceive(theodora, rosabelle) -> Travesty(theodora, shepard)\nforall x (Untypical(x) -> Mend(x, shepard))\nforall x (Vocalic(x) -> Perceive(x, cliff))\nforall x (Perceive(x, rosabelle) -> Mend(x, cliff))\nUnified(rosabelle) -> Perceive(rosabelle, shepard)\nforall x (Travesty(x, cliff) and Vocalic(cliff) -> Travesty(cliff, shepard))\nforall x (Perceive(x, cliff) -> Travesty(cliff, rosabelle))\nforall x (Mend(x, shepard) and Travesty(shepard, cliff) -> Travesty(shepard, rosabelle))\n\nTravesty(cliff, rosabelle)\n\nVocalic(shepard) and forall x (Vocalic(x) -> Perceive(x, cliff)) -> therefore Perceive(shepard, cliff) Perceive(shepard, cliff) and forall x (Perceive(x, cliff) -> Travesty(cliff, rosabelle)) -> therefore Travesty(cliff, rosabelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The ricca is sapient. The ricca is principled. The ricca criminate the joline. The ricca dumbfound the joline. The ricca dumbfound the wenona. The ricca restrain the joline. The ricca restrain the wenona. The joline is coruscant. The joline criminate the wenona. The joline dumbfound the wenona. The josefina is raiding. The josefina criminate the wenona. The josefina dumbfound the wenona. The wenona is raiding. The wenona criminate the ricca. If the wenona criminate the ricca then the wenona dumbfound the joline. If something is principled then it restrain the joline. If something is coruscant then it criminate the josefina. If something criminate the ricca then it restrain the josefina. If the ricca is sapient then the ricca criminate the joline. If something dumbfound the josefina and the josefina is coruscant then the josefina dumbfound the joline. If something criminate the josefina then the josefina dumbfound the ricca. If something restrain the joline and the joline dumbfound the josefina then the joline dumbfound the ricca. The josefina does not need the ricca.", "logic": "\nSapient(ricca)\nPrincipled(ricca)\nCriminate(ricca, joline)\nDumbfound(ricca, joline)\nDumbfound(ricca, wenona)\nRestrain(ricca, joline)\nRestrain(ricca, wenona)\nCoruscant(joline)\nCriminate(joline, wenona)\nDumbfound(joline, wenona)\nRaiding(josefina)\nCriminate(josefina, wenona)\nDumbfound(josefina, wenona)\nRaiding(wenona)\nCriminate(wenona, ricca)\nCriminate(wenona, ricca) -> Dumbfound(wenona, joline)\nforall x (Principled(x) -> Restrain(x, joline))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) -> Criminate(x, josefina))\nforall x (Criminate(x, ricca) -> Restrain(x, josefina))\nSapient(ricca) -> Criminate(ricca, joline)\nforall x (Dumbfound(x, josefina) and Coruscant(josefina) -> Dumbfound(josefina, joline))\nforall x (Criminate(x, josefina) -> Dumbfound(josefina, ricca))\nforall x (Restrain(x, joline) and Dumbfound(joline, josefina) -> Dumbfound(joline, ricca))\n\nnot Dumbfound(josefina, ricca)\n\nCoruscant(joline) and forall x (Coruscant(x) -> Criminate(x, josefina)) -> therefore Criminate(joline, josefina) Criminate(joline, josefina) and forall x (Criminate(x, josefina) -> Dumbfound(josefina, ricca)) -> therefore Dumbfound(josefina, ricca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The bengt is slapdash. The bengt is paralytic. The bengt accent the mickie. The bengt brooch the mickie. The bengt brooch the neville. The bengt smudge the mickie. The bengt smudge the neville. The mickie is cataclinal. The mickie accent the neville. The mickie brooch the neville. The diane is unimpeded. The diane accent the neville. The diane brooch the neville. The neville is unimpeded. The neville accent the bengt. If the neville accent the bengt then the neville brooch the mickie. If something is paralytic then it smudge the mickie. If something is cataclinal then it accent the diane. If something accent the bengt then it smudge the diane. If the bengt is slapdash then the bengt accent the mickie. If something brooch the diane and the diane is cataclinal then the diane brooch the mickie. If something accent the diane then the diane brooch the bengt. If something smudge the mickie and the mickie brooch the diane then the mickie brooch the bengt. The bengt does not like the diane.", "logic": "\nSlapdash(bengt)\nParalytic(bengt)\nAccent(bengt, mickie)\nBrooch(bengt, mickie)\nBrooch(bengt, neville)\nSmudge(bengt, mickie)\nSmudge(bengt, neville)\nCataclinal(mickie)\nAccent(mickie, neville)\nBrooch(mickie, neville)\nUnimpeded(diane)\nAccent(diane, neville)\nBrooch(diane, neville)\nUnimpeded(neville)\nAccent(neville, bengt)\nAccent(neville, bengt) -> Brooch(neville, mickie)\nforall x (Paralytic(x) -> Smudge(x, mickie))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) -> Accent(x, diane))\nforall x (Accent(x, bengt) -> Smudge(x, diane))\nSlapdash(bengt) -> Accent(bengt, mickie)\nforall x (Brooch(x, diane) and Cataclinal(diane) -> Brooch(diane, mickie))\nforall x (Accent(x, diane) -> Brooch(diane, bengt))\nforall x (Smudge(x, mickie) and Brooch(mickie, diane) -> Brooch(mickie, bengt))\n\nnot Accent(bengt, diane)\n\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) -> Accent(x, diane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The cassey is whirring. The cassey is gingerly. The cassey perfuse the jenny. The cassey convey the jenny. The cassey convey the irvin. The cassey core the jenny. The cassey core the irvin. The jenny is fractious. The jenny perfuse the irvin. The jenny convey the irvin. The odilia is spayed. The odilia perfuse the irvin. The odilia convey the irvin. The irvin is spayed. The irvin perfuse the cassey. If the irvin perfuse the cassey then the irvin convey the jenny. If something is gingerly then it core the jenny. If something is fractious then it perfuse the odilia. If something perfuse the cassey then it core the odilia. If the cassey is whirring then the cassey perfuse the jenny. If something convey the odilia and the odilia is fractious then the odilia convey the jenny. If something perfuse the odilia then the odilia convey the cassey. If something core the jenny and the jenny convey the odilia then the jenny convey the cassey. The odilia core the jenny.", "logic": "\nWhirring(cassey)\nGingerly(cassey)\nPerfuse(cassey, jenny)\nConvey(cassey, jenny)\nConvey(cassey, irvin)\nCore(cassey, jenny)\nCore(cassey, irvin)\nFractious(jenny)\nPerfuse(jenny, irvin)\nConvey(jenny, irvin)\nSpayed(odilia)\nPerfuse(odilia, irvin)\nConvey(odilia, irvin)\nSpayed(irvin)\nPerfuse(irvin, cassey)\nPerfuse(irvin, cassey) -> Convey(irvin, jenny)\nforall x (Gingerly(x) -> Core(x, jenny))\nforall x (Fractious(x) -> Perfuse(x, odilia))\nforall x (Perfuse(x, cassey) -> Core(x, odilia))\nWhirring(cassey) -> Perfuse(cassey, jenny)\nforall x (Convey(x, odilia) and Fractious(odilia) -> Convey(odilia, jenny))\nforall x (Perfuse(x, odilia) -> Convey(odilia, cassey))\nforall x (Core(x, jenny) and Convey(jenny, odilia) -> Convey(jenny, cassey))\n\nCore(odilia, jenny)\n\nforall x (Gingerly(x) -> Core(x, jenny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The alisha is studious. The alisha is basifixed. The alisha slug the raimund. The alisha bootlick the raimund. The alisha bootlick the eddi. The alisha cabin the raimund. The alisha cabin the eddi. The raimund is cased. The raimund slug the eddi. The raimund bootlick the eddi. The elga is twiglike. The elga slug the eddi. The elga bootlick the eddi. The eddi is twiglike. The eddi slug the alisha. If the eddi slug the alisha then the eddi bootlick the raimund. If something is basifixed then it cabin the raimund. If something is cased then it slug the elga. If something slug the alisha then it cabin the elga. If the alisha is studious then the alisha slug the raimund. If something bootlick the elga and the elga is cased then the elga bootlick the raimund. If something slug the elga then the elga bootlick the alisha. If something cabin the raimund and the raimund bootlick the elga then the raimund bootlick the alisha. The elga does not need the raimund.", "logic": "\nStudious(alisha)\nBasifixed(alisha)\nSlug(alisha, raimund)\nBootlick(alisha, raimund)\nBootlick(alisha, eddi)\nCabin(alisha, raimund)\nCabin(alisha, eddi)\nCased(raimund)\nSlug(raimund, eddi)\nBootlick(raimund, eddi)\nTwiglike(elga)\nSlug(elga, eddi)\nBootlick(elga, eddi)\nTwiglike(eddi)\nSlug(eddi, alisha)\nSlug(eddi, alisha) -> Bootlick(eddi, raimund)\nforall x (Basifixed(x) -> Cabin(x, raimund))\nforall x (Cased(x) -> Slug(x, elga))\nforall x (Slug(x, alisha) -> Cabin(x, elga))\nStudious(alisha) -> Slug(alisha, raimund)\nforall x (Bootlick(x, elga) and Cased(elga) -> Bootlick(elga, raimund))\nforall x (Slug(x, elga) -> Bootlick(elga, alisha))\nforall x (Cabin(x, raimund) and Bootlick(raimund, elga) -> Bootlick(raimund, alisha))\n\nnot Bootlick(elga, raimund)\n\nforall x (Bootlick(x, elga) and Cased(elga) -> Bootlick(elga, raimund)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The shena is ternate. The shena is foremost. The shena institute the farrand. The shena speak the farrand. The shena speak the errol. The shena obliterate the farrand. The shena obliterate the errol. The farrand is binomial. The farrand institute the errol. The farrand speak the errol. The pamela is unpromised. The pamela institute the errol. The pamela speak the errol. The errol is unpromised. The errol institute the shena. If the errol institute the shena then the errol speak the farrand. If something is foremost then it obliterate the farrand. If something is binomial then it institute the pamela. If something institute the shena then it obliterate the pamela. If the shena is ternate then the shena institute the farrand. If something speak the pamela and the pamela is binomial then the pamela speak the farrand. If something institute the pamela then the pamela speak the shena. If something obliterate the farrand and the farrand speak the pamela then the farrand speak the shena. The pamela obliterate the shena.", "logic": "\nTernate(shena)\nForemost(shena)\nInstitute(shena, farrand)\nSpeak(shena, farrand)\nSpeak(shena, errol)\nObliterate(shena, farrand)\nObliterate(shena, errol)\nBinomial(farrand)\nInstitute(farrand, errol)\nSpeak(farrand, errol)\nUnpromised(pamela)\nInstitute(pamela, errol)\nSpeak(pamela, errol)\nUnpromised(errol)\nInstitute(errol, shena)\nInstitute(errol, shena) -> Speak(errol, farrand)\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Obliterate(x, farrand))\nforall x (Binomial(x) -> Institute(x, pamela))\nforall x (Institute(x, shena) -> Obliterate(x, pamela))\nTernate(shena) -> Institute(shena, farrand)\nforall x (Speak(x, pamela) and Binomial(pamela) -> Speak(pamela, farrand))\nforall x (Institute(x, pamela) -> Speak(pamela, shena))\nforall x (Obliterate(x, farrand) and Speak(farrand, pamela) -> Speak(farrand, shena))\n\nObliterate(pamela, shena)\n\nObliterate(pamela, shena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The edie is clinquant. The edie is antigenic. The edie chaperon the kesley. The edie federalize the kesley. The edie federalize the fulton. The edie subvert the kesley. The edie subvert the fulton. The kesley is abulic. The kesley chaperon the fulton. The kesley federalize the fulton. The rosalinde is denotative. The rosalinde chaperon the fulton. The rosalinde federalize the fulton. The fulton is denotative. The fulton chaperon the edie. If the fulton chaperon the edie then the fulton federalize the kesley. If something is antigenic then it subvert the kesley. If something is abulic then it chaperon the rosalinde. If something chaperon the edie then it subvert the rosalinde. If the edie is clinquant then the edie chaperon the kesley. If something federalize the rosalinde and the rosalinde is abulic then the rosalinde federalize the kesley. If something chaperon the rosalinde then the rosalinde federalize the edie. If something subvert the kesley and the kesley federalize the rosalinde then the kesley federalize the edie. The edie does not visit the edie.", "logic": "\nClinquant(edie)\nAntigenic(edie)\nChaperon(edie, kesley)\nFederalize(edie, kesley)\nFederalize(edie, fulton)\nSubvert(edie, kesley)\nSubvert(edie, fulton)\nAbulic(kesley)\nChaperon(kesley, fulton)\nFederalize(kesley, fulton)\nDenotative(rosalinde)\nChaperon(rosalinde, fulton)\nFederalize(rosalinde, fulton)\nDenotative(fulton)\nChaperon(fulton, edie)\nChaperon(fulton, edie) -> Federalize(fulton, kesley)\nforall x (Antigenic(x) -> Subvert(x, kesley))\nforall x (Abulic(x) -> Chaperon(x, rosalinde))\nforall x (Chaperon(x, edie) -> Subvert(x, rosalinde))\nClinquant(edie) -> Chaperon(edie, kesley)\nforall x (Federalize(x, rosalinde) and Abulic(rosalinde) -> Federalize(rosalinde, kesley))\nforall x (Chaperon(x, rosalinde) -> Federalize(rosalinde, edie))\nforall x (Subvert(x, kesley) and Federalize(kesley, rosalinde) -> Federalize(kesley, edie))\n\nnot Subvert(edie, edie)\n\nnot Subvert(edie, edie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "The deeann is emeritus. The deeann is autocratic. The deeann understock the ralina. The deeann compound the ralina. The deeann compound the janey. The deeann neutralize the ralina. The deeann neutralize the janey. The ralina is proofed. The ralina understock the janey. The ralina compound the janey. The alissa is cislunar. The alissa understock the janey. The alissa compound the janey. The janey is cislunar. The janey understock the deeann. If the janey understock the deeann then the janey compound the ralina. If something is autocratic then it neutralize the ralina. If something is proofed then it understock the alissa. If something understock the deeann then it neutralize the alissa. If the deeann is emeritus then the deeann understock the ralina. If something compound the alissa and the alissa is proofed then the alissa compound the ralina. If something understock the alissa then the alissa compound the deeann. If something neutralize the ralina and the ralina compound the alissa then the ralina compound the deeann. The alissa is proofed.", "logic": "\nEmeritus(deeann)\nAutocratic(deeann)\nUnderstock(deeann, ralina)\nCompound(deeann, ralina)\nCompound(deeann, janey)\nNeutralize(deeann, ralina)\nNeutralize(deeann, janey)\nProofed(ralina)\nUnderstock(ralina, janey)\nCompound(ralina, janey)\nCislunar(alissa)\nUnderstock(alissa, janey)\nCompound(alissa, janey)\nCislunar(janey)\nUnderstock(janey, deeann)\nUnderstock(janey, deeann) -> Compound(janey, ralina)\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> Neutralize(x, ralina))\nforall x (Proofed(x) -> Understock(x, alissa))\nforall x (Understock(x, deeann) -> Neutralize(x, alissa))\nEmeritus(deeann) -> Understock(deeann, ralina)\nforall x (Compound(x, alissa) and Proofed(alissa) -> Compound(alissa, ralina))\nforall x (Understock(x, alissa) -> Compound(alissa, deeann))\nforall x (Neutralize(x, ralina) and Compound(ralina, alissa) -> Compound(ralina, deeann))\n\nProofed(alissa)\n\nProofed(alissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-974"} {"premises": "Vannie is not saliferous. Vannie is coagulate. Vannie is sounding. Erik is not perinatal. Erik is sounding. Vilma is mated. Vilma is sounding. Sella is consoling. Sella is coagulate. Sella is sounding. If something is perinatal and inveterate then it is coagulate. White things are not perinatal. If Vilma is not perinatal then Vilma is not coagulate. Vannie is coagulate.", "logic": "\nnot Saliferous(vannie)\nCoagulate(vannie)\nSounding(vannie)\nnot Perinatal(erik)\nSounding(erik)\nMated(vilma)\nSounding(vilma)\nConsoling(sella)\nCoagulate(sella)\nSounding(sella)\nforall x (Perinatal(x) and Inveterate(x) -> Coagulate(x))\nforall x (Sounding(x) -> not Perinatal(x))\nnot Perinatal(vilma) -> not Coagulate(vilma)\n\nCoagulate(vannie)\n\ntherefore Coagulate(vannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Herta is not apposable. Herta is aseptic. Herta is limitless. Rafe is not wordless. Rafe is limitless. Sabine is wavering. Sabine is limitless. Coraline is leadless. Coraline is aseptic. Coraline is limitless. If something is wordless and gaudy then it is aseptic. White things are not wordless. If Sabine is not wordless then Sabine is not aseptic. Sabine is not limitless.", "logic": "\nnot Apposable(herta)\nAseptic(herta)\nLimitless(herta)\nnot Wordless(rafe)\nLimitless(rafe)\nWavering(sabine)\nLimitless(sabine)\nLeadless(coraline)\nAseptic(coraline)\nLimitless(coraline)\nforall x (Wordless(x) and Gaudy(x) -> Aseptic(x))\nforall x (Limitless(x) -> not Wordless(x))\nnot Wordless(sabine) -> not Aseptic(sabine)\n\nnot Limitless(sabine)\n\ntherefore Limitless(sabine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Jenna is not imbecilic. Jenna is odorous. Jenna is rickety. Leoine is not cuboid. Leoine is rickety. Nari is adducting. Nari is rickety. Susette is bitter. Susette is odorous. Susette is rickety. If something is cuboid and bended then it is odorous. White things are not cuboid. If Nari is not cuboid then Nari is not odorous. Nari is not cuboid.", "logic": "\nnot Imbecilic(jenna)\nOdorous(jenna)\nRickety(jenna)\nnot Cuboid(leoine)\nRickety(leoine)\nAdducting(nari)\nRickety(nari)\nBitter(susette)\nOdorous(susette)\nRickety(susette)\nforall x (Cuboid(x) and Bended(x) -> Odorous(x))\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> not Cuboid(x))\nnot Cuboid(nari) -> not Odorous(nari)\n\nnot Cuboid(nari)\n\nRickety(nari) and forall x (Rickety(x) -> not Cuboid(x)) -> therefore not Cuboid(nari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Titos is not mosstone. Titos is rumbling. Titos is overarm. Abbot is not agnostic. Abbot is overarm. Sean is cloze. Sean is overarm. Gwynne is tame. Gwynne is rumbling. Gwynne is overarm. If something is agnostic and dacitic then it is rumbling. White things are not agnostic. If Sean is not agnostic then Sean is not rumbling. Sean is agnostic.", "logic": "\nnot Mosstone(titos)\nRumbling(titos)\nOverarm(titos)\nnot Agnostic(abbot)\nOverarm(abbot)\nCloze(sean)\nOverarm(sean)\nTame(gwynne)\nRumbling(gwynne)\nOverarm(gwynne)\nforall x (Agnostic(x) and Dacitic(x) -> Rumbling(x))\nforall x (Overarm(x) -> not Agnostic(x))\nnot Agnostic(sean) -> not Rumbling(sean)\n\nAgnostic(sean)\n\nOverarm(sean) and forall x (Overarm(x) -> not Agnostic(x)) -> therefore not Agnostic(sean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Mildred is not frowzy. Mildred is unrepaired. Mildred is goalless. Nidia is not grilled. Nidia is goalless. Rozamond is fallow. Rozamond is goalless. Iain is terete. Iain is unrepaired. Iain is goalless. If something is grilled and dainty then it is unrepaired. White things are not grilled. If Rozamond is not grilled then Rozamond is not unrepaired. Rozamond is not unrepaired.", "logic": "\nnot Frowzy(mildred)\nUnrepaired(mildred)\nGoalless(mildred)\nnot Grilled(nidia)\nGoalless(nidia)\nFallow(rozamond)\nGoalless(rozamond)\nTerete(iain)\nUnrepaired(iain)\nGoalless(iain)\nforall x (Grilled(x) and Dainty(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) -> not Grilled(x))\nnot Grilled(rozamond) -> not Unrepaired(rozamond)\n\nnot Unrepaired(rozamond)\n\nGoalless(rozamond) and forall x (Goalless(x) -> not Grilled(x)) -> therefore not Grilled(rozamond) not Grilled(rozamond) and not Grilled(rozamond) -> not Unrepaired(rozamond) -> therefore not Unrepaired(rozamond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Pamela is not uraemic. Pamela is nonbearing. Pamela is tearless. Lisbeth is not corneal. Lisbeth is tearless. Vaclav is precedent. Vaclav is tearless. Vin is plantar. Vin is nonbearing. Vin is tearless. If something is corneal and tipped then it is nonbearing. White things are not corneal. If Vaclav is not corneal then Vaclav is not nonbearing. Vaclav is nonbearing.", "logic": "\nnot Uraemic(pamela)\nNonbearing(pamela)\nTearless(pamela)\nnot Corneal(lisbeth)\nTearless(lisbeth)\nPrecedent(vaclav)\nTearless(vaclav)\nPlantar(vin)\nNonbearing(vin)\nTearless(vin)\nforall x (Corneal(x) and Tipped(x) -> Nonbearing(x))\nforall x (Tearless(x) -> not Corneal(x))\nnot Corneal(vaclav) -> not Nonbearing(vaclav)\n\nNonbearing(vaclav)\n\nTearless(vaclav) and forall x (Tearless(x) -> not Corneal(x)) -> therefore not Corneal(vaclav) not Corneal(vaclav) and not Corneal(vaclav) -> not Nonbearing(vaclav) -> therefore not Nonbearing(vaclav)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Randolph is not manichee. Randolph is bountiful. Randolph is plumed. Lulita is not wayfaring. Lulita is plumed. Fanni is awestruck. Fanni is plumed. Bonny is underlying. Bonny is bountiful. Bonny is plumed. If something is wayfaring and yeasty then it is bountiful. White things are not wayfaring. If Fanni is not wayfaring then Fanni is not bountiful. Lulita is not bountiful.", "logic": "\nnot Manichee(randolph)\nBountiful(randolph)\nPlumed(randolph)\nnot Wayfaring(lulita)\nPlumed(lulita)\nAwestruck(fanni)\nPlumed(fanni)\nUnderlying(bonny)\nBountiful(bonny)\nPlumed(bonny)\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) and Yeasty(x) -> Bountiful(x))\nforall x (Plumed(x) -> not Wayfaring(x))\nnot Wayfaring(fanni) -> not Bountiful(fanni)\n\nnot Bountiful(lulita)\n\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) and Yeasty(x) -> Bountiful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Haywood is not unusual. Haywood is stagnant. Haywood is unlikely. Grete is not ionian. Grete is unlikely. Michal is attacking. Michal is unlikely. Maggy is siliceous. Maggy is stagnant. Maggy is unlikely. If something is ionian and taillike then it is stagnant. White things are not ionian. If Michal is not ionian then Michal is not stagnant. Grete is unusual.", "logic": "\nnot Unusual(haywood)\nStagnant(haywood)\nUnlikely(haywood)\nnot Ionian(grete)\nUnlikely(grete)\nAttacking(michal)\nUnlikely(michal)\nSiliceous(maggy)\nStagnant(maggy)\nUnlikely(maggy)\nforall x (Ionian(x) and Taillike(x) -> Stagnant(x))\nforall x (Unlikely(x) -> not Ionian(x))\nnot Ionian(michal) -> not Stagnant(michal)\n\nUnusual(grete)\n\nUnusual(grete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Caralie is not vulcanized. Caralie is rugose. Caralie is orthoptic. Sissie is not foliose. Sissie is orthoptic. Ciara is verdant. Ciara is orthoptic. Britani is pithy. Britani is rugose. Britani is orthoptic. If something is foliose and jungian then it is rugose. White things are not foliose. If Ciara is not foliose then Ciara is not rugose. Britani is not vulcanized.", "logic": "\nnot Vulcanized(caralie)\nRugose(caralie)\nOrthoptic(caralie)\nnot Foliose(sissie)\nOrthoptic(sissie)\nVerdant(ciara)\nOrthoptic(ciara)\nPithy(britani)\nRugose(britani)\nOrthoptic(britani)\nforall x (Foliose(x) and Jungian(x) -> Rugose(x))\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) -> not Foliose(x))\nnot Foliose(ciara) -> not Rugose(ciara)\n\nnot Vulcanized(britani)\n\nnot Vulcanized(britani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Dick is not local. Dick is primed. Dick is speckled. Krissie is not acronymous. Krissie is speckled. Daisey is neotenous. Daisey is speckled. Cathy is astrocytic. Cathy is primed. Cathy is speckled. If something is acronymous and motorless then it is primed. White things are not acronymous. If Daisey is not acronymous then Daisey is not primed. Daisey is astrocytic.", "logic": "\nnot Local(dick)\nPrimed(dick)\nSpeckled(dick)\nnot Acronymous(krissie)\nSpeckled(krissie)\nNeotenous(daisey)\nSpeckled(daisey)\nAstrocytic(cathy)\nPrimed(cathy)\nSpeckled(cathy)\nforall x (Acronymous(x) and Motorless(x) -> Primed(x))\nforall x (Speckled(x) -> not Acronymous(x))\nnot Acronymous(daisey) -> not Primed(daisey)\n\nAstrocytic(daisey)\n\nAstrocytic(daisey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Marta is not gloveless. Marta is hiplength. Marta is lilac. Claudette is not opalescent. Claudette is lilac. Web is illogical. Web is lilac. Swen is detectable. Swen is hiplength. Swen is lilac. If something is opalescent and unenviable then it is hiplength. White things are not opalescent. If Web is not opalescent then Web is not hiplength. Marta is not illogical.", "logic": "\nnot Gloveless(marta)\nHiplength(marta)\nLilac(marta)\nnot Opalescent(claudette)\nLilac(claudette)\nIllogical(web)\nLilac(web)\nDetectable(swen)\nHiplength(swen)\nLilac(swen)\nforall x (Opalescent(x) and Unenviable(x) -> Hiplength(x))\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> not Opalescent(x))\nnot Opalescent(web) -> not Hiplength(web)\n\nnot Illogical(marta)\n\nnot Illogical(marta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "Jewell is not unassuming. Jewell is mucinous. Jewell is mesmerised. Dorella is not tactful. Dorella is mesmerised. Arvie is yelled. Arvie is mesmerised. Aila is seasonable. Aila is mucinous. Aila is mesmerised. If something is tactful and savoury then it is mucinous. White things are not tactful. If Arvie is not tactful then Arvie is not mucinous. Jewell is savoury.", "logic": "\nnot Unassuming(jewell)\nMucinous(jewell)\nMesmerised(jewell)\nnot Tactful(dorella)\nMesmerised(dorella)\nYelled(arvie)\nMesmerised(arvie)\nSeasonable(aila)\nMucinous(aila)\nMesmerised(aila)\nforall x (Tactful(x) and Savoury(x) -> Mucinous(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> not Tactful(x))\nnot Tactful(arvie) -> not Mucinous(arvie)\n\nSavoury(jewell)\n\nSavoury(jewell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-212"} {"premises": "The moses braid the willmott. The moses wharf the casper. The moses is unshaped. The willmott braid the moses. The willmott braid the casper. The willmott outmarch the casper. The casper braid the willmott. If the casper wharf the willmott then the casper is madcap. If something outmarch the moses then the moses does not chase the willmott. If the moses does not need the willmott then the willmott does not chase the casper. If something braid the casper then it is madcap. If something is madcap then it wharf the casper. If something is judicable then it braid the casper. If something is salted then it wharf the willmott. If something braid the casper and it is naval then it braid the willmott. The moses braid the willmott.", "logic": "\nBraid(moses, willmott)\nWharf(moses, casper)\nUnshaped(moses)\nBraid(willmott, moses)\nBraid(willmott, casper)\nOutmarch(willmott, casper)\nBraid(casper, willmott)\nWharf(casper, willmott) -> Madcap(casper)\nforall x (Outmarch(x, moses) -> not Braid(moses, willmott))\nnot Outmarch(moses, willmott) -> not Braid(willmott, casper)\nforall x (Braid(x, casper) -> Madcap(x))\nforall x (Madcap(x) -> Wharf(x, casper))\nforall x (Judicable(x) -> Braid(x, casper))\nforall x (Salted(x) -> Wharf(x, willmott))\nforall x (Braid(x, casper) and Naval(x) -> Braid(x, willmott))\n\nBraid(moses, willmott)\n\ntherefore Braid(moses, willmott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The katleen sprain the bendite. The katleen syndicate the dyane. The katleen is imbecilic. The bendite sprain the katleen. The bendite sprain the dyane. The bendite bejewel the dyane. The dyane sprain the bendite. If the dyane syndicate the bendite then the dyane is unanimated. If something bejewel the katleen then the katleen does not chase the bendite. If the katleen does not need the bendite then the bendite does not chase the dyane. If something sprain the dyane then it is unanimated. If something is unanimated then it syndicate the dyane. If something is aspherical then it sprain the dyane. If something is inpouring then it syndicate the bendite. If something sprain the dyane and it is callable then it sprain the bendite. The bendite does not chase the katleen.", "logic": "\nSprain(katleen, bendite)\nSyndicate(katleen, dyane)\nImbecilic(katleen)\nSprain(bendite, katleen)\nSprain(bendite, dyane)\nBejewel(bendite, dyane)\nSprain(dyane, bendite)\nSyndicate(dyane, bendite) -> Unanimated(dyane)\nforall x (Bejewel(x, katleen) -> not Sprain(katleen, bendite))\nnot Bejewel(katleen, bendite) -> not Sprain(bendite, dyane)\nforall x (Sprain(x, dyane) -> Unanimated(x))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) -> Syndicate(x, dyane))\nforall x (Aspherical(x) -> Sprain(x, dyane))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) -> Syndicate(x, bendite))\nforall x (Sprain(x, dyane) and Callable(x) -> Sprain(x, bendite))\n\nnot Sprain(bendite, katleen)\n\ntherefore Sprain(bendite, katleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The rosetta motor the marvin. The rosetta audition the dexter. The rosetta is ticklish. The marvin motor the rosetta. The marvin motor the dexter. The marvin purvey the dexter. The dexter motor the marvin. If the dexter audition the marvin then the dexter is absorptive. If something purvey the rosetta then the rosetta does not chase the marvin. If the rosetta does not need the marvin then the marvin does not chase the dexter. If something motor the dexter then it is absorptive. If something is absorptive then it audition the dexter. If something is inaccurate then it motor the dexter. If something is adjustable then it audition the marvin. If something motor the dexter and it is uricosuric then it motor the marvin. The marvin is absorptive.", "logic": "\nMotor(rosetta, marvin)\nAudition(rosetta, dexter)\nTicklish(rosetta)\nMotor(marvin, rosetta)\nMotor(marvin, dexter)\nPurvey(marvin, dexter)\nMotor(dexter, marvin)\nAudition(dexter, marvin) -> Absorptive(dexter)\nforall x (Purvey(x, rosetta) -> not Motor(rosetta, marvin))\nnot Purvey(rosetta, marvin) -> not Motor(marvin, dexter)\nforall x (Motor(x, dexter) -> Absorptive(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) -> Audition(x, dexter))\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) -> Motor(x, dexter))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> Audition(x, marvin))\nforall x (Motor(x, dexter) and Uricosuric(x) -> Motor(x, marvin))\n\nAbsorptive(marvin)\n\nMotor(marvin, dexter) and forall x (Motor(x, dexter) -> Absorptive(x)) -> therefore Absorptive(marvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The sly fluoresce the shimon. The sly extend the marla. The sly is epidermal. The shimon fluoresce the sly. The shimon fluoresce the marla. The shimon nurture the marla. The marla fluoresce the shimon. If the marla extend the shimon then the marla is subjugable. If something nurture the sly then the sly does not chase the shimon. If the sly does not need the shimon then the shimon does not chase the marla. If something fluoresce the marla then it is subjugable. If something is subjugable then it extend the marla. If something is bacteroid then it fluoresce the marla. If something is viennese then it extend the shimon. If something fluoresce the marla and it is canty then it fluoresce the shimon. The shimon is not subjugable.", "logic": "\nFluoresce(sly, shimon)\nExtend(sly, marla)\nEpidermal(sly)\nFluoresce(shimon, sly)\nFluoresce(shimon, marla)\nNurture(shimon, marla)\nFluoresce(marla, shimon)\nExtend(marla, shimon) -> Subjugable(marla)\nforall x (Nurture(x, sly) -> not Fluoresce(sly, shimon))\nnot Nurture(sly, shimon) -> not Fluoresce(shimon, marla)\nforall x (Fluoresce(x, marla) -> Subjugable(x))\nforall x (Subjugable(x) -> Extend(x, marla))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Fluoresce(x, marla))\nforall x (Viennese(x) -> Extend(x, shimon))\nforall x (Fluoresce(x, marla) and Canty(x) -> Fluoresce(x, shimon))\n\nnot Subjugable(shimon)\n\nFluoresce(shimon, marla) and forall x (Fluoresce(x, marla) -> Subjugable(x)) -> therefore Subjugable(shimon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The kermit rearrange the karna. The kermit civilize the anneliese. The kermit is napoleonic. The karna rearrange the kermit. The karna rearrange the anneliese. The karna brazen the anneliese. The anneliese rearrange the karna. If the anneliese civilize the karna then the anneliese is vermicular. If something brazen the kermit then the kermit does not chase the karna. If the kermit does not need the karna then the karna does not chase the anneliese. If something rearrange the anneliese then it is vermicular. If something is vermicular then it civilize the anneliese. If something is soundable then it rearrange the anneliese. If something is consuming then it civilize the karna. If something rearrange the anneliese and it is amharic then it rearrange the karna. The karna civilize the anneliese.", "logic": "\nRearrange(kermit, karna)\nCivilize(kermit, anneliese)\nNapoleonic(kermit)\nRearrange(karna, kermit)\nRearrange(karna, anneliese)\nBrazen(karna, anneliese)\nRearrange(anneliese, karna)\nCivilize(anneliese, karna) -> Vermicular(anneliese)\nforall x (Brazen(x, kermit) -> not Rearrange(kermit, karna))\nnot Brazen(kermit, karna) -> not Rearrange(karna, anneliese)\nforall x (Rearrange(x, anneliese) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Vermicular(x) -> Civilize(x, anneliese))\nforall x (Soundable(x) -> Rearrange(x, anneliese))\nforall x (Consuming(x) -> Civilize(x, karna))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, anneliese) and Amharic(x) -> Rearrange(x, karna))\n\nCivilize(karna, anneliese)\n\nRearrange(karna, anneliese) and forall x (Rearrange(x, anneliese) -> Vermicular(x)) -> therefore Vermicular(karna) Vermicular(karna) and forall x (Vermicular(x) -> Civilize(x, anneliese)) -> therefore Civilize(karna, anneliese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The normie punish the mercedes. The normie bundle the carissa. The normie is follicular. The mercedes punish the normie. The mercedes punish the carissa. The mercedes gawp the carissa. The carissa punish the mercedes. If the carissa bundle the mercedes then the carissa is starry. If something gawp the normie then the normie does not chase the mercedes. If the normie does not need the mercedes then the mercedes does not chase the carissa. If something punish the carissa then it is starry. If something is starry then it bundle the carissa. If something is oversea then it punish the carissa. If something is austere then it bundle the mercedes. If something punish the carissa and it is adulatory then it punish the mercedes. The mercedes does not eat the carissa.", "logic": "\nPunish(normie, mercedes)\nBundle(normie, carissa)\nFollicular(normie)\nPunish(mercedes, normie)\nPunish(mercedes, carissa)\nGawp(mercedes, carissa)\nPunish(carissa, mercedes)\nBundle(carissa, mercedes) -> Starry(carissa)\nforall x (Gawp(x, normie) -> not Punish(normie, mercedes))\nnot Gawp(normie, mercedes) -> not Punish(mercedes, carissa)\nforall x (Punish(x, carissa) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Bundle(x, carissa))\nforall x (Oversea(x) -> Punish(x, carissa))\nforall x (Austere(x) -> Bundle(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Punish(x, carissa) and Adulatory(x) -> Punish(x, mercedes))\n\nnot Bundle(mercedes, carissa)\n\nPunish(mercedes, carissa) and forall x (Punish(x, carissa) -> Starry(x)) -> therefore Starry(mercedes) Starry(mercedes) and forall x (Starry(x) -> Bundle(x, carissa)) -> therefore Bundle(mercedes, carissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The joanna redress the alvina. The joanna anathemise the eran. The joanna is vasiform. The alvina redress the joanna. The alvina redress the eran. The alvina uniform the eran. The eran redress the alvina. If the eran anathemise the alvina then the eran is rare. If something uniform the joanna then the joanna does not chase the alvina. If the joanna does not need the alvina then the alvina does not chase the eran. If something redress the eran then it is rare. If something is rare then it anathemise the eran. If something is incautious then it redress the eran. If something is stubbled then it anathemise the alvina. If something redress the eran and it is trabeated then it redress the alvina. The joanna is not rare.", "logic": "\nRedress(joanna, alvina)\nAnathemise(joanna, eran)\nVasiform(joanna)\nRedress(alvina, joanna)\nRedress(alvina, eran)\nUniform(alvina, eran)\nRedress(eran, alvina)\nAnathemise(eran, alvina) -> Rare(eran)\nforall x (Uniform(x, joanna) -> not Redress(joanna, alvina))\nnot Uniform(joanna, alvina) -> not Redress(alvina, eran)\nforall x (Redress(x, eran) -> Rare(x))\nforall x (Rare(x) -> Anathemise(x, eran))\nforall x (Incautious(x) -> Redress(x, eran))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) -> Anathemise(x, alvina))\nforall x (Redress(x, eran) and Trabeated(x) -> Redress(x, alvina))\n\nnot Rare(joanna)\n\nforall x (Redress(x, eran) -> Rare(x)) <- forall x (Incautious(x) -> Redress(x, eran)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The jayne lecture the orella. The jayne retire the piggy. The jayne is heedful. The orella lecture the jayne. The orella lecture the piggy. The orella victual the piggy. The piggy lecture the orella. If the piggy retire the orella then the piggy is scandent. If something victual the jayne then the jayne does not chase the orella. If the jayne does not need the orella then the orella does not chase the piggy. If something lecture the piggy then it is scandent. If something is scandent then it retire the piggy. If something is flocculent then it lecture the piggy. If something is lightproof then it retire the orella. If something lecture the piggy and it is messy then it lecture the orella. The piggy retire the piggy.", "logic": "\nLecture(jayne, orella)\nRetire(jayne, piggy)\nHeedful(jayne)\nLecture(orella, jayne)\nLecture(orella, piggy)\nVictual(orella, piggy)\nLecture(piggy, orella)\nRetire(piggy, orella) -> Scandent(piggy)\nforall x (Victual(x, jayne) -> not Lecture(jayne, orella))\nnot Victual(jayne, orella) -> not Lecture(orella, piggy)\nforall x (Lecture(x, piggy) -> Scandent(x))\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Retire(x, piggy))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Lecture(x, piggy))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Retire(x, orella))\nforall x (Lecture(x, piggy) and Messy(x) -> Lecture(x, orella))\n\nRetire(piggy, piggy)\n\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Retire(x, piggy)) <- Retire(piggy, orella) -> Scandent(piggy) <- forall x (Lightproof(x) -> Retire(x, orella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The alina titivate the alexandra. The alina oversee the manon. The alina is mouldy. The alexandra titivate the alina. The alexandra titivate the manon. The alexandra penalize the manon. The manon titivate the alexandra. If the manon oversee the alexandra then the manon is equipoised. If something penalize the alina then the alina does not chase the alexandra. If the alina does not need the alexandra then the alexandra does not chase the manon. If something titivate the manon then it is equipoised. If something is equipoised then it oversee the manon. If something is ternate then it titivate the manon. If something is surly then it oversee the alexandra. If something titivate the manon and it is stannic then it titivate the alexandra. The alina does not chase the manon.", "logic": "\nTitivate(alina, alexandra)\nOversee(alina, manon)\nMouldy(alina)\nTitivate(alexandra, alina)\nTitivate(alexandra, manon)\nPenalize(alexandra, manon)\nTitivate(manon, alexandra)\nOversee(manon, alexandra) -> Equipoised(manon)\nforall x (Penalize(x, alina) -> not Titivate(alina, alexandra))\nnot Penalize(alina, alexandra) -> not Titivate(alexandra, manon)\nforall x (Titivate(x, manon) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) -> Oversee(x, manon))\nforall x (Ternate(x) -> Titivate(x, manon))\nforall x (Surly(x) -> Oversee(x, alexandra))\nforall x (Titivate(x, manon) and Stannic(x) -> Titivate(x, alexandra))\n\nnot Titivate(alina, manon)\n\nforall x (Ternate(x) -> Titivate(x, manon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The shelba precess the rozamond. The shelba patrol the lauraine. The shelba is nonslip. The rozamond precess the shelba. The rozamond precess the lauraine. The rozamond reanimate the lauraine. The lauraine precess the rozamond. If the lauraine patrol the rozamond then the lauraine is resonant. If something reanimate the shelba then the shelba does not chase the rozamond. If the shelba does not need the rozamond then the rozamond does not chase the lauraine. If something precess the lauraine then it is resonant. If something is resonant then it patrol the lauraine. If something is undersize then it precess the lauraine. If something is referent then it patrol the rozamond. If something precess the lauraine and it is loquacious then it precess the rozamond. The rozamond reanimate the shelba.", "logic": "\nPrecess(shelba, rozamond)\nPatrol(shelba, lauraine)\nNonslip(shelba)\nPrecess(rozamond, shelba)\nPrecess(rozamond, lauraine)\nReanimate(rozamond, lauraine)\nPrecess(lauraine, rozamond)\nPatrol(lauraine, rozamond) -> Resonant(lauraine)\nforall x (Reanimate(x, shelba) -> not Precess(shelba, rozamond))\nnot Reanimate(shelba, rozamond) -> not Precess(rozamond, lauraine)\nforall x (Precess(x, lauraine) -> Resonant(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Patrol(x, lauraine))\nforall x (Undersize(x) -> Precess(x, lauraine))\nforall x (Referent(x) -> Patrol(x, rozamond))\nforall x (Precess(x, lauraine) and Loquacious(x) -> Precess(x, rozamond))\n\nReanimate(rozamond, shelba)\n\nReanimate(rozamond, shelba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The seamus frolic the luise. The seamus rubberneck the arvind. The seamus is empurpled. The luise frolic the seamus. The luise frolic the arvind. The luise aspire the arvind. The arvind frolic the luise. If the arvind rubberneck the luise then the arvind is focal. If something aspire the seamus then the seamus does not chase the luise. If the seamus does not need the luise then the luise does not chase the arvind. If something frolic the arvind then it is focal. If something is focal then it rubberneck the arvind. If something is bumptious then it frolic the arvind. If something is clamorous then it rubberneck the luise. If something frolic the arvind and it is visible then it frolic the luise. The seamus does not eat the seamus.", "logic": "\nFrolic(seamus, luise)\nRubberneck(seamus, arvind)\nEmpurpled(seamus)\nFrolic(luise, seamus)\nFrolic(luise, arvind)\nAspire(luise, arvind)\nFrolic(arvind, luise)\nRubberneck(arvind, luise) -> Focal(arvind)\nforall x (Aspire(x, seamus) -> not Frolic(seamus, luise))\nnot Aspire(seamus, luise) -> not Frolic(luise, arvind)\nforall x (Frolic(x, arvind) -> Focal(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Rubberneck(x, arvind))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) -> Frolic(x, arvind))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) -> Rubberneck(x, luise))\nforall x (Frolic(x, arvind) and Visible(x) -> Frolic(x, luise))\n\nnot Rubberneck(seamus, seamus)\n\nnot Rubberneck(seamus, seamus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "The darth nicker the harriet. The darth factor the page. The darth is unbeatable. The harriet nicker the darth. The harriet nicker the page. The harriet concentre the page. The page nicker the harriet. If the page factor the harriet then the page is masculine. If something concentre the darth then the darth does not chase the harriet. If the darth does not need the harriet then the harriet does not chase the page. If something nicker the page then it is masculine. If something is masculine then it factor the page. If something is periodical then it nicker the page. If something is tireless then it factor the harriet. If something nicker the page and it is congeneric then it nicker the harriet. The page is tireless.", "logic": "\nNicker(darth, harriet)\nFactor(darth, page)\nUnbeatable(darth)\nNicker(harriet, darth)\nNicker(harriet, page)\nConcentre(harriet, page)\nNicker(page, harriet)\nFactor(page, harriet) -> Masculine(page)\nforall x (Concentre(x, darth) -> not Nicker(darth, harriet))\nnot Concentre(darth, harriet) -> not Nicker(harriet, page)\nforall x (Nicker(x, page) -> Masculine(x))\nforall x (Masculine(x) -> Factor(x, page))\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Nicker(x, page))\nforall x (Tireless(x) -> Factor(x, harriet))\nforall x (Nicker(x, page) and Congeneric(x) -> Nicker(x, harriet))\n\nTireless(page)\n\nTireless(page) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-907"} {"premises": "Alexander is dire. Alexander is protozoan. Alexander is leglike. Ruben is dire. Bobina is lipless. Bobina is not dire. Bobina is leglike. Tiphani is not auditory. Tiphani is not lipless. Tiphani is dire. All auditory people are protozoan. If Bobina is patronless then Bobina is not protozoan. All leglike people are auditory. Alexander is protozoan.", "logic": "\nDire(alexander)\nProtozoan(alexander)\nLeglike(alexander)\nDire(ruben)\nLipless(bobina)\nnot Dire(bobina)\nLeglike(bobina)\nnot Auditory(tiphani)\nnot Lipless(tiphani)\nDire(tiphani)\nforall x (Auditory(x) -> Protozoan(x))\nPatronless(bobina) -> not Protozoan(bobina)\nforall x (Leglike(x) -> Auditory(x))\n\nProtozoan(alexander)\n\ntherefore Protozoan(alexander)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Rochell is erratic. Rochell is lustreless. Rochell is crescendo. Cookie is erratic. Ash is perceptive. Ash is not erratic. Ash is crescendo. Olag is not daedal. Olag is not perceptive. Olag is erratic. All daedal people are lustreless. If Ash is devalued then Ash is not lustreless. All crescendo people are daedal. Olag is perceptive.", "logic": "\nErratic(rochell)\nLustreless(rochell)\nCrescendo(rochell)\nErratic(cookie)\nPerceptive(ash)\nnot Erratic(ash)\nCrescendo(ash)\nnot Daedal(olag)\nnot Perceptive(olag)\nErratic(olag)\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Lustreless(x))\nDevalued(ash) -> not Lustreless(ash)\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Daedal(x))\n\nPerceptive(olag)\n\ntherefore not Perceptive(olag)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Joye is zapotec. Joye is sibilant. Joye is ametropic. Mirna is zapotec. Jena is bulgy. Jena is not zapotec. Jena is ametropic. Broderick is not ghanaian. Broderick is not bulgy. Broderick is zapotec. All ghanaian people are sibilant. If Jena is glaswegian then Jena is not sibilant. All ametropic people are ghanaian. Jena is ghanaian.", "logic": "\nZapotec(joye)\nSibilant(joye)\nAmetropic(joye)\nZapotec(mirna)\nBulgy(jena)\nnot Zapotec(jena)\nAmetropic(jena)\nnot Ghanaian(broderick)\nnot Bulgy(broderick)\nZapotec(broderick)\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Sibilant(x))\nGlaswegian(jena) -> not Sibilant(jena)\nforall x (Ametropic(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\n\nGhanaian(jena)\n\nAmetropic(jena) and forall x (Ametropic(x) -> Ghanaian(x)) -> therefore Ghanaian(jena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Brier is nosed. Brier is anurous. Brier is loco. Halie is nosed. Sheba is unpictured. Sheba is not nosed. Sheba is loco. Harmony is not linked. Harmony is not unpictured. Harmony is nosed. All linked people are anurous. If Sheba is imbecile then Sheba is not anurous. All loco people are linked. Brier is not linked.", "logic": "\nNosed(brier)\nAnurous(brier)\nLoco(brier)\nNosed(halie)\nUnpictured(sheba)\nnot Nosed(sheba)\nLoco(sheba)\nnot Linked(harmony)\nnot Unpictured(harmony)\nNosed(harmony)\nforall x (Linked(x) -> Anurous(x))\nImbecile(sheba) -> not Anurous(sheba)\nforall x (Loco(x) -> Linked(x))\n\nnot Linked(brier)\n\nLoco(brier) and forall x (Loco(x) -> Linked(x)) -> therefore Linked(brier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Joachim is uncoloured. Joachim is congeneric. Joachim is neuroglial. Harlin is uncoloured. Gray is fictile. Gray is not uncoloured. Gray is neuroglial. Daren is not shrubby. Daren is not fictile. Daren is uncoloured. All shrubby people are congeneric. If Gray is evacuant then Gray is not congeneric. All neuroglial people are shrubby. Gray is congeneric.", "logic": "\nUncoloured(joachim)\nCongeneric(joachim)\nNeuroglial(joachim)\nUncoloured(harlin)\nFictile(gray)\nnot Uncoloured(gray)\nNeuroglial(gray)\nnot Shrubby(daren)\nnot Fictile(daren)\nUncoloured(daren)\nforall x (Shrubby(x) -> Congeneric(x))\nEvacuant(gray) -> not Congeneric(gray)\nforall x (Neuroglial(x) -> Shrubby(x))\n\nCongeneric(gray)\n\nNeuroglial(gray) and forall x (Neuroglial(x) -> Shrubby(x)) -> therefore Shrubby(gray) Shrubby(gray) and forall x (Shrubby(x) -> Congeneric(x)) -> therefore Congeneric(gray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Carly is rational. Carly is lowest. Carly is ictic. Vern is rational. Florance is recurrent. Florance is not rational. Florance is ictic. Kourtney is not autophytic. Kourtney is not recurrent. Kourtney is rational. All autophytic people are lowest. If Florance is undercover then Florance is not lowest. All ictic people are autophytic. Florance is not lowest.", "logic": "\nRational(carly)\nLowest(carly)\nIctic(carly)\nRational(vern)\nRecurrent(florance)\nnot Rational(florance)\nIctic(florance)\nnot Autophytic(kourtney)\nnot Recurrent(kourtney)\nRational(kourtney)\nforall x (Autophytic(x) -> Lowest(x))\nUndercover(florance) -> not Lowest(florance)\nforall x (Ictic(x) -> Autophytic(x))\n\nnot Lowest(florance)\n\nIctic(florance) and forall x (Ictic(x) -> Autophytic(x)) -> therefore Autophytic(florance) Autophytic(florance) and forall x (Autophytic(x) -> Lowest(x)) -> therefore Lowest(florance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Pierce is hidrotic. Pierce is versatile. Pierce is wireless. Darcey is hidrotic. Rodd is ectopic. Rodd is not hidrotic. Rodd is wireless. Betsey is not integrated. Betsey is not ectopic. Betsey is hidrotic. All integrated people are versatile. If Rodd is crispy then Rodd is not versatile. All wireless people are integrated. Darcey is not integrated.", "logic": "\nHidrotic(pierce)\nVersatile(pierce)\nWireless(pierce)\nHidrotic(darcey)\nEctopic(rodd)\nnot Hidrotic(rodd)\nWireless(rodd)\nnot Integrated(betsey)\nnot Ectopic(betsey)\nHidrotic(betsey)\nforall x (Integrated(x) -> Versatile(x))\nCrispy(rodd) -> not Versatile(rodd)\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Integrated(x))\n\nnot Integrated(darcey)\n\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Integrated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Beverlee is blustery. Beverlee is unmanlike. Beverlee is totaled. Duane is blustery. Olle is anticancer. Olle is not blustery. Olle is totaled. Leodora is not manx. Leodora is not anticancer. Leodora is blustery. All manx people are unmanlike. If Olle is anamorphic then Olle is not unmanlike. All totaled people are manx. Duane is unmanlike.", "logic": "\nBlustery(beverlee)\nUnmanlike(beverlee)\nTotaled(beverlee)\nBlustery(duane)\nAnticancer(olle)\nnot Blustery(olle)\nTotaled(olle)\nnot Manx(leodora)\nnot Anticancer(leodora)\nBlustery(leodora)\nforall x (Manx(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\nAnamorphic(olle) -> not Unmanlike(olle)\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Manx(x))\n\nUnmanlike(duane)\n\nforall x (Manx(x) -> Unmanlike(x)) <- forall x (Totaled(x) -> Manx(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Amelia is unpriestly. Amelia is blank. Amelia is navicular. Gardiner is unpriestly. Gwennie is distant. Gwennie is not unpriestly. Gwennie is navicular. Kristine is not affixial. Kristine is not distant. Kristine is unpriestly. All affixial people are blank. If Gwennie is unhoped then Gwennie is not blank. All navicular people are affixial. Kristine is not blank.", "logic": "\nUnpriestly(amelia)\nBlank(amelia)\nNavicular(amelia)\nUnpriestly(gardiner)\nDistant(gwennie)\nnot Unpriestly(gwennie)\nNavicular(gwennie)\nnot Affixial(kristine)\nnot Distant(kristine)\nUnpriestly(kristine)\nforall x (Affixial(x) -> Blank(x))\nUnhoped(gwennie) -> not Blank(gwennie)\nforall x (Navicular(x) -> Affixial(x))\n\nnot Blank(kristine)\n\nforall x (Affixial(x) -> Blank(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Vivie is sevenfold. Vivie is rubicund. Vivie is british. Braden is sevenfold. Donny is boughed. Donny is not sevenfold. Donny is british. Adriana is not pectinate. Adriana is not boughed. Adriana is sevenfold. All pectinate people are rubicund. If Donny is cottony then Donny is not rubicund. All british people are pectinate. Vivie is boughed.", "logic": "\nSevenfold(vivie)\nRubicund(vivie)\nBritish(vivie)\nSevenfold(braden)\nBoughed(donny)\nnot Sevenfold(donny)\nBritish(donny)\nnot Pectinate(adriana)\nnot Boughed(adriana)\nSevenfold(adriana)\nforall x (Pectinate(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nCottony(donny) -> not Rubicund(donny)\nforall x (British(x) -> Pectinate(x))\n\nBoughed(vivie)\n\nBoughed(vivie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Betteanne is arabic. Betteanne is neurologic. Betteanne is vicennial. Jana is arabic. Gretal is sanitized. Gretal is not arabic. Gretal is vicennial. Roselia is not brushy. Roselia is not sanitized. Roselia is arabic. All brushy people are neurologic. If Gretal is choric then Gretal is not neurologic. All vicennial people are brushy. Betteanne is not red.", "logic": "\nArabic(betteanne)\nNeurologic(betteanne)\nVicennial(betteanne)\nArabic(jana)\nSanitized(gretal)\nnot Arabic(gretal)\nVicennial(gretal)\nnot Brushy(roselia)\nnot Sanitized(roselia)\nArabic(roselia)\nforall x (Brushy(x) -> Neurologic(x))\nChoric(gretal) -> not Neurologic(gretal)\nforall x (Vicennial(x) -> Brushy(x))\n\nnot Red(betteanne)\n\nnot Red(betteanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "Maris is pedigreed. Maris is stressful. Maris is leglike. Marlee is pedigreed. Ranee is itchy. Ranee is not pedigreed. Ranee is leglike. Winona is not plumbous. Winona is not itchy. Winona is pedigreed. All plumbous people are stressful. If Ranee is rhombic then Ranee is not stressful. All leglike people are plumbous. Ranee is red.", "logic": "\nPedigreed(maris)\nStressful(maris)\nLeglike(maris)\nPedigreed(marlee)\nItchy(ranee)\nnot Pedigreed(ranee)\nLeglike(ranee)\nnot Plumbous(winona)\nnot Itchy(winona)\nPedigreed(winona)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) -> Stressful(x))\nRhombic(ranee) -> not Stressful(ranee)\nforall x (Leglike(x) -> Plumbous(x))\n\nRed(ranee)\n\nRed(ranee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1171"} {"premises": "The susette cheerlead the fancie. The cate is aestival. The fancie cheerlead the cate. If someone shoulder the susette and they see the susette then the susette cheerlead the fancie. If someone shoulder the susette then they are semirigid. All aestival people are semirigid. If someone cheerlead the fancie then they chase the susette. If someone is entitled and they see the susette then the susette sparge the fancie. If someone is entitled and they do not visit the susette then they chase the cate. The fancie cheerlead the cate.", "logic": "\nCheerlead(susette, fancie)\nAestival(cate)\nCheerlead(fancie, cate)\nforall x (Shoulder(x, susette) and Sparge(x, susette) -> Cheerlead(susette, fancie))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, susette) -> Semirigid(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Semirigid(x))\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, fancie) -> Shoulder(x, susette))\nforall x (Entitled(x) and Sparge(x, susette) -> Sparge(susette, fancie))\nforall x (Entitled(x) and not Cheerlead(x, susette) -> Shoulder(x, cate))\n\nCheerlead(fancie, cate)\n\ntherefore Cheerlead(fancie, cate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The latashia shamanize the noel. The gunner is coccoid. The noel shamanize the gunner. If someone restock the latashia and they see the latashia then the latashia shamanize the noel. If someone restock the latashia then they are eldest. All coccoid people are eldest. If someone shamanize the noel then they chase the latashia. If someone is camp and they see the latashia then the latashia irradiate the noel. If someone is camp and they do not visit the latashia then they chase the gunner. The noel does not visit the gunner.", "logic": "\nShamanize(latashia, noel)\nCoccoid(gunner)\nShamanize(noel, gunner)\nforall x (Restock(x, latashia) and Irradiate(x, latashia) -> Shamanize(latashia, noel))\nforall x (Restock(x, latashia) -> Eldest(x))\nforall x (Coccoid(x) -> Eldest(x))\nforall x (Shamanize(x, noel) -> Restock(x, latashia))\nforall x (Camp(x) and Irradiate(x, latashia) -> Irradiate(latashia, noel))\nforall x (Camp(x) and not Shamanize(x, latashia) -> Restock(x, gunner))\n\nnot Shamanize(noel, gunner)\n\ntherefore Shamanize(noel, gunner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The hermione bemoan the jameson. The calli is mournful. The jameson bemoan the calli. If someone overjoy the hermione and they see the hermione then the hermione bemoan the jameson. If someone overjoy the hermione then they are puckish. All mournful people are puckish. If someone bemoan the jameson then they chase the hermione. If someone is patchy and they see the hermione then the hermione undrape the jameson. If someone is patchy and they do not visit the hermione then they chase the calli. The hermione overjoy the hermione.", "logic": "\nBemoan(hermione, jameson)\nMournful(calli)\nBemoan(jameson, calli)\nforall x (Overjoy(x, hermione) and Undrape(x, hermione) -> Bemoan(hermione, jameson))\nforall x (Overjoy(x, hermione) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Bemoan(x, jameson) -> Overjoy(x, hermione))\nforall x (Patchy(x) and Undrape(x, hermione) -> Undrape(hermione, jameson))\nforall x (Patchy(x) and not Bemoan(x, hermione) -> Overjoy(x, calli))\n\nOverjoy(hermione, hermione)\n\nBemoan(hermione, jameson) and forall x (Bemoan(x, jameson) -> Overjoy(x, hermione)) -> therefore Overjoy(hermione, hermione)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The aline convect the iain. The herrick is paroxysmal. The iain convect the herrick. If someone cobble the aline and they see the aline then the aline convect the iain. If someone cobble the aline then they are geared. All paroxysmal people are geared. If someone convect the iain then they chase the aline. If someone is flyaway and they see the aline then the aline gore the iain. If someone is flyaway and they do not visit the aline then they chase the herrick. The aline does not chase the aline.", "logic": "\nConvect(aline, iain)\nParoxysmal(herrick)\nConvect(iain, herrick)\nforall x (Cobble(x, aline) and Gore(x, aline) -> Convect(aline, iain))\nforall x (Cobble(x, aline) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Convect(x, iain) -> Cobble(x, aline))\nforall x (Flyaway(x) and Gore(x, aline) -> Gore(aline, iain))\nforall x (Flyaway(x) and not Convect(x, aline) -> Cobble(x, herrick))\n\nnot Cobble(aline, aline)\n\nConvect(aline, iain) and forall x (Convect(x, iain) -> Cobble(x, aline)) -> therefore Cobble(aline, aline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The lonna segment the melonie. The durward is chatoyant. The melonie segment the durward. If someone combust the lonna and they see the lonna then the lonna segment the melonie. If someone combust the lonna then they are hortatory. All chatoyant people are hortatory. If someone segment the melonie then they chase the lonna. If someone is arrhythmic and they see the lonna then the lonna kern the melonie. If someone is arrhythmic and they do not visit the lonna then they chase the durward. The lonna is hortatory.", "logic": "\nSegment(lonna, melonie)\nChatoyant(durward)\nSegment(melonie, durward)\nforall x (Combust(x, lonna) and Kern(x, lonna) -> Segment(lonna, melonie))\nforall x (Combust(x, lonna) -> Hortatory(x))\nforall x (Chatoyant(x) -> Hortatory(x))\nforall x (Segment(x, melonie) -> Combust(x, lonna))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) and Kern(x, lonna) -> Kern(lonna, melonie))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) and not Segment(x, lonna) -> Combust(x, durward))\n\nHortatory(lonna)\n\nSegment(lonna, melonie) and forall x (Segment(x, melonie) -> Combust(x, lonna)) -> therefore Combust(lonna, lonna) Combust(lonna, lonna) and forall x (Combust(x, lonna) -> Hortatory(x)) -> therefore Hortatory(lonna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The byron churn the delphina. The rhody is turkmen. The delphina churn the rhody. If someone furnish the byron and they see the byron then the byron churn the delphina. If someone furnish the byron then they are paleozoic. All turkmen people are paleozoic. If someone churn the delphina then they chase the byron. If someone is alarming and they see the byron then the byron bronze the delphina. If someone is alarming and they do not visit the byron then they chase the rhody. The byron is not paleozoic.", "logic": "\nChurn(byron, delphina)\nTurkmen(rhody)\nChurn(delphina, rhody)\nforall x (Furnish(x, byron) and Bronze(x, byron) -> Churn(byron, delphina))\nforall x (Furnish(x, byron) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Turkmen(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Churn(x, delphina) -> Furnish(x, byron))\nforall x (Alarming(x) and Bronze(x, byron) -> Bronze(byron, delphina))\nforall x (Alarming(x) and not Churn(x, byron) -> Furnish(x, rhody))\n\nnot Paleozoic(byron)\n\nChurn(byron, delphina) and forall x (Churn(x, delphina) -> Furnish(x, byron)) -> therefore Furnish(byron, byron) Furnish(byron, byron) and forall x (Furnish(x, byron) -> Paleozoic(x)) -> therefore Paleozoic(byron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The florri systemise the marcos. The latashia is faithful. The marcos systemise the latashia. If someone pool the florri and they see the florri then the florri systemise the marcos. If someone pool the florri then they are premature. All faithful people are premature. If someone systemise the marcos then they chase the florri. If someone is biblical and they see the florri then the florri innervate the marcos. If someone is biblical and they do not visit the florri then they chase the latashia. The marcos does not chase the florri.", "logic": "\nSystemise(florri, marcos)\nFaithful(latashia)\nSystemise(marcos, latashia)\nforall x (Pool(x, florri) and Innervate(x, florri) -> Systemise(florri, marcos))\nforall x (Pool(x, florri) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Faithful(x) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Systemise(x, marcos) -> Pool(x, florri))\nforall x (Biblical(x) and Innervate(x, florri) -> Innervate(florri, marcos))\nforall x (Biblical(x) and not Systemise(x, florri) -> Pool(x, latashia))\n\nnot Pool(marcos, florri)\n\nforall x (Systemise(x, marcos) -> Pool(x, florri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The inger reconvert the hewet. The deanna is napped. The hewet reconvert the deanna. If someone bottleneck the inger and they see the inger then the inger reconvert the hewet. If someone bottleneck the inger then they are thinking. All napped people are thinking. If someone reconvert the hewet then they chase the inger. If someone is prescribed and they see the inger then the inger quote the hewet. If someone is prescribed and they do not visit the inger then they chase the deanna. The inger quote the hewet.", "logic": "\nReconvert(inger, hewet)\nNapped(deanna)\nReconvert(hewet, deanna)\nforall x (Bottleneck(x, inger) and Quote(x, inger) -> Reconvert(inger, hewet))\nforall x (Bottleneck(x, inger) -> Thinking(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) -> Thinking(x))\nforall x (Reconvert(x, hewet) -> Bottleneck(x, inger))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and Quote(x, inger) -> Quote(inger, hewet))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and not Reconvert(x, inger) -> Bottleneck(x, deanna))\n\nQuote(inger, hewet)\n\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and Quote(x, inger) -> Quote(inger, hewet)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The sunshine julienne the ambrosio. The zeke is plantal. The ambrosio julienne the zeke. If someone acquit the sunshine and they see the sunshine then the sunshine julienne the ambrosio. If someone acquit the sunshine then they are cissy. All plantal people are cissy. If someone julienne the ambrosio then they chase the sunshine. If someone is boss and they see the sunshine then the sunshine chandelle the ambrosio. If someone is boss and they do not visit the sunshine then they chase the zeke. The sunshine does not chase the zeke.", "logic": "\nJulienne(sunshine, ambrosio)\nPlantal(zeke)\nJulienne(ambrosio, zeke)\nforall x (Acquit(x, sunshine) and Chandelle(x, sunshine) -> Julienne(sunshine, ambrosio))\nforall x (Acquit(x, sunshine) -> Cissy(x))\nforall x (Plantal(x) -> Cissy(x))\nforall x (Julienne(x, ambrosio) -> Acquit(x, sunshine))\nforall x (Boss(x) and Chandelle(x, sunshine) -> Chandelle(sunshine, ambrosio))\nforall x (Boss(x) and not Julienne(x, sunshine) -> Acquit(x, zeke))\n\nnot Acquit(sunshine, zeke)\n\nforall x (Boss(x) and not Julienne(x, sunshine) -> Acquit(x, zeke)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The enrique summit the nanine. The donovan is unfastened. The nanine summit the donovan. If someone teach the enrique and they see the enrique then the enrique summit the nanine. If someone teach the enrique then they are raining. All unfastened people are raining. If someone summit the nanine then they chase the enrique. If someone is bulblike and they see the enrique then the enrique enact the nanine. If someone is bulblike and they do not visit the enrique then they chase the donovan. The nanine enact the donovan.", "logic": "\nSummit(enrique, nanine)\nUnfastened(donovan)\nSummit(nanine, donovan)\nforall x (Teach(x, enrique) and Enact(x, enrique) -> Summit(enrique, nanine))\nforall x (Teach(x, enrique) -> Raining(x))\nforall x (Unfastened(x) -> Raining(x))\nforall x (Summit(x, nanine) -> Teach(x, enrique))\nforall x (Bulblike(x) and Enact(x, enrique) -> Enact(enrique, nanine))\nforall x (Bulblike(x) and not Summit(x, enrique) -> Teach(x, donovan))\n\nEnact(nanine, donovan)\n\nEnact(nanine, donovan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The claudina shoulder the abagail. The goober is petrous. The abagail shoulder the goober. If someone batch the claudina and they see the claudina then the claudina shoulder the abagail. If someone batch the claudina then they are gangrenous. All petrous people are gangrenous. If someone shoulder the abagail then they chase the claudina. If someone is acarpelous and they see the claudina then the claudina rank the abagail. If someone is acarpelous and they do not visit the claudina then they chase the goober. The abagail does not see the claudina.", "logic": "\nShoulder(claudina, abagail)\nPetrous(goober)\nShoulder(abagail, goober)\nforall x (Batch(x, claudina) and Rank(x, claudina) -> Shoulder(claudina, abagail))\nforall x (Batch(x, claudina) -> Gangrenous(x))\nforall x (Petrous(x) -> Gangrenous(x))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, abagail) -> Batch(x, claudina))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and Rank(x, claudina) -> Rank(claudina, abagail))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and not Shoulder(x, claudina) -> Batch(x, goober))\n\nnot Rank(abagail, claudina)\n\nnot Rank(abagail, claudina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The carlynne upholster the lowell. The joao is lovelorn. The lowell upholster the joao. If someone cram the carlynne and they see the carlynne then the carlynne upholster the lowell. If someone cram the carlynne then they are delightful. All lovelorn people are delightful. If someone upholster the lowell then they chase the carlynne. If someone is binominal and they see the carlynne then the carlynne persevere the lowell. If someone is binominal and they do not visit the carlynne then they chase the joao. The joao is binominal.", "logic": "\nUpholster(carlynne, lowell)\nLovelorn(joao)\nUpholster(lowell, joao)\nforall x (Cram(x, carlynne) and Persevere(x, carlynne) -> Upholster(carlynne, lowell))\nforall x (Cram(x, carlynne) -> Delightful(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Delightful(x))\nforall x (Upholster(x, lowell) -> Cram(x, carlynne))\nforall x (Binominal(x) and Persevere(x, carlynne) -> Persevere(carlynne, lowell))\nforall x (Binominal(x) and not Upholster(x, carlynne) -> Cram(x, joao))\n\nBinominal(joao)\n\nBinominal(joao) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1853"} {"premises": "The eli is heralded. The rosaleen quiesce the millie. The millie task the eli. If something explode the millie then it is taxpaying. If something is victorious then it task the millie. If something quiesce the rosaleen and the rosaleen explode the millie then the rosaleen is taxpaying. All perceptual things are composed. If something quiesce the rosaleen then the rosaleen task the eli. If the eli quiesce the rosaleen then the eli explode the rosaleen. If something explode the eli then the eli quiesce the millie. If something task the eli and the eli is heralded then the eli quiesce the rosaleen. The eli is heralded.", "logic": "\nHeralded(eli)\nQuiesce(rosaleen, millie)\nTask(millie, eli)\nforall x (Explode(x, millie) -> Taxpaying(x))\nforall x (Victorious(x) -> Task(x, millie))\nforall x (Quiesce(x, rosaleen) and Explode(rosaleen, millie) -> Taxpaying(rosaleen))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) -> Composed(x))\nforall x (Quiesce(x, rosaleen) -> Task(rosaleen, eli))\nQuiesce(eli, rosaleen) -> Explode(eli, rosaleen)\nforall x (Explode(x, eli) -> Quiesce(eli, millie))\nforall x (Task(x, eli) and Heralded(eli) -> Quiesce(eli, rosaleen))\n\nHeralded(eli)\n\ntherefore Heralded(eli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The wilmette is esthetic. The alexina riffle the lynna. The lynna unwind the wilmette. If something ferment the lynna then it is servo. If something is weeny then it unwind the lynna. If something riffle the alexina and the alexina ferment the lynna then the alexina is servo. All holey things are playful. If something riffle the alexina then the alexina unwind the wilmette. If the wilmette riffle the alexina then the wilmette ferment the alexina. If something ferment the wilmette then the wilmette riffle the lynna. If something unwind the wilmette and the wilmette is esthetic then the wilmette riffle the alexina. The lynna does not see the wilmette.", "logic": "\nEsthetic(wilmette)\nRiffle(alexina, lynna)\nUnwind(lynna, wilmette)\nforall x (Ferment(x, lynna) -> Servo(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) -> Unwind(x, lynna))\nforall x (Riffle(x, alexina) and Ferment(alexina, lynna) -> Servo(alexina))\nforall x (Holey(x) -> Playful(x))\nforall x (Riffle(x, alexina) -> Unwind(alexina, wilmette))\nRiffle(wilmette, alexina) -> Ferment(wilmette, alexina)\nforall x (Ferment(x, wilmette) -> Riffle(wilmette, lynna))\nforall x (Unwind(x, wilmette) and Esthetic(wilmette) -> Riffle(wilmette, alexina))\n\nnot Unwind(lynna, wilmette)\n\ntherefore Unwind(lynna, wilmette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The willey is vermiform. The charline quake the marchall. The marchall pattern the willey. If something exert the marchall then it is scurvy. If something is cyrillic then it pattern the marchall. If something quake the charline and the charline exert the marchall then the charline is scurvy. All cartesian things are continuant. If something quake the charline then the charline pattern the willey. If the willey quake the charline then the willey exert the charline. If something exert the willey then the willey quake the marchall. If something pattern the willey and the willey is vermiform then the willey quake the charline. The willey quake the charline.", "logic": "\nVermiform(willey)\nQuake(charline, marchall)\nPattern(marchall, willey)\nforall x (Exert(x, marchall) -> Scurvy(x))\nforall x (Cyrillic(x) -> Pattern(x, marchall))\nforall x (Quake(x, charline) and Exert(charline, marchall) -> Scurvy(charline))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Quake(x, charline) -> Pattern(charline, willey))\nQuake(willey, charline) -> Exert(willey, charline)\nforall x (Exert(x, willey) -> Quake(willey, marchall))\nforall x (Pattern(x, willey) and Vermiform(willey) -> Quake(willey, charline))\n\nQuake(willey, charline)\n\nPattern(marchall, willey) and Vermiform(willey) and forall x (Pattern(x, willey) and Vermiform(willey) -> Quake(willey, charline)) -> therefore Quake(willey, charline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The gunner is polyphase. The silvester embower the ulrich. The ulrich oyster the gunner. If something tucker the ulrich then it is octagonal. If something is fearsome then it oyster the ulrich. If something embower the silvester and the silvester tucker the ulrich then the silvester is octagonal. All speechless things are canned. If something embower the silvester then the silvester oyster the gunner. If the gunner embower the silvester then the gunner tucker the silvester. If something tucker the gunner then the gunner embower the ulrich. If something oyster the gunner and the gunner is polyphase then the gunner embower the silvester. The gunner does not need the silvester.", "logic": "\nPolyphase(gunner)\nEmbower(silvester, ulrich)\nOyster(ulrich, gunner)\nforall x (Tucker(x, ulrich) -> Octagonal(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Oyster(x, ulrich))\nforall x (Embower(x, silvester) and Tucker(silvester, ulrich) -> Octagonal(silvester))\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Embower(x, silvester) -> Oyster(silvester, gunner))\nEmbower(gunner, silvester) -> Tucker(gunner, silvester)\nforall x (Tucker(x, gunner) -> Embower(gunner, ulrich))\nforall x (Oyster(x, gunner) and Polyphase(gunner) -> Embower(gunner, silvester))\n\nnot Embower(gunner, silvester)\n\nOyster(ulrich, gunner) and Polyphase(gunner) and forall x (Oyster(x, gunner) and Polyphase(gunner) -> Embower(gunner, silvester)) -> therefore Embower(gunner, silvester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The roger is omnipotent. The shandie close the kristal. The kristal visit the roger. If something undeceive the kristal then it is phocine. If something is shrunken then it visit the kristal. If something close the shandie and the shandie undeceive the kristal then the shandie is phocine. All croatian things are mannish. If something close the shandie then the shandie visit the roger. If the roger close the shandie then the roger undeceive the shandie. If something undeceive the roger then the roger close the kristal. If something visit the roger and the roger is omnipotent then the roger close the shandie. The shandie visit the roger.", "logic": "\nOmnipotent(roger)\nClose(shandie, kristal)\nVisit(kristal, roger)\nforall x (Undeceive(x, kristal) -> Phocine(x))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) -> Visit(x, kristal))\nforall x (Close(x, shandie) and Undeceive(shandie, kristal) -> Phocine(shandie))\nforall x (Croatian(x) -> Mannish(x))\nforall x (Close(x, shandie) -> Visit(shandie, roger))\nClose(roger, shandie) -> Undeceive(roger, shandie)\nforall x (Undeceive(x, roger) -> Close(roger, kristal))\nforall x (Visit(x, roger) and Omnipotent(roger) -> Close(roger, shandie))\n\nVisit(shandie, roger)\n\nVisit(kristal, roger) and Omnipotent(roger) and forall x (Visit(x, roger) and Omnipotent(roger) -> Close(roger, shandie)) -> therefore Close(roger, shandie) Close(roger, shandie) and forall x (Close(x, shandie) -> Visit(shandie, roger)) -> therefore Visit(shandie, roger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The rikki is relaxed. The bancroft razz the corilla. The corilla rule the rikki. If something hump the corilla then it is convivial. If something is chorionic then it rule the corilla. If something razz the bancroft and the bancroft hump the corilla then the bancroft is convivial. All landed things are gibelike. If something razz the bancroft then the bancroft rule the rikki. If the rikki razz the bancroft then the rikki hump the bancroft. If something hump the rikki then the rikki razz the corilla. If something rule the rikki and the rikki is relaxed then the rikki razz the bancroft. The rikki does not visit the bancroft.", "logic": "\nRelaxed(rikki)\nRazz(bancroft, corilla)\nRule(corilla, rikki)\nforall x (Hump(x, corilla) -> Convivial(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Rule(x, corilla))\nforall x (Razz(x, bancroft) and Hump(bancroft, corilla) -> Convivial(bancroft))\nforall x (Landed(x) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Razz(x, bancroft) -> Rule(bancroft, rikki))\nRazz(rikki, bancroft) -> Hump(rikki, bancroft)\nforall x (Hump(x, rikki) -> Razz(rikki, corilla))\nforall x (Rule(x, rikki) and Relaxed(rikki) -> Razz(rikki, bancroft))\n\nnot Hump(rikki, bancroft)\n\nRule(corilla, rikki) and Relaxed(rikki) and forall x (Rule(x, rikki) and Relaxed(rikki) -> Razz(rikki, bancroft)) -> therefore Razz(rikki, bancroft) Razz(rikki, bancroft) and Razz(rikki, bancroft) -> Hump(rikki, bancroft) -> therefore Hump(rikki, bancroft)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The inigo is anasarcous. The humbert free the krysta. The krysta overcrowd the inigo. If something allow the krysta then it is apteral. If something is ungreased then it overcrowd the krysta. If something free the humbert and the humbert allow the krysta then the humbert is apteral. All unopened things are incendiary. If something free the humbert then the humbert overcrowd the inigo. If the inigo free the humbert then the inigo allow the humbert. If something allow the inigo then the inigo free the krysta. If something overcrowd the inigo and the inigo is anasarcous then the inigo free the humbert. The inigo is not incendiary.", "logic": "\nAnasarcous(inigo)\nFree(humbert, krysta)\nOvercrowd(krysta, inigo)\nforall x (Allow(x, krysta) -> Apteral(x))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> Overcrowd(x, krysta))\nforall x (Free(x, humbert) and Allow(humbert, krysta) -> Apteral(humbert))\nforall x (Unopened(x) -> Incendiary(x))\nforall x (Free(x, humbert) -> Overcrowd(humbert, inigo))\nFree(inigo, humbert) -> Allow(inigo, humbert)\nforall x (Allow(x, inigo) -> Free(inigo, krysta))\nforall x (Overcrowd(x, inigo) and Anasarcous(inigo) -> Free(inigo, humbert))\n\nnot Incendiary(inigo)\n\nforall x (Unopened(x) -> Incendiary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The demetris is unproven. The kiersten heal the lex. The lex festoon the demetris. If something dehydrate the lex then it is incipient. If something is ismaili then it festoon the lex. If something heal the kiersten and the kiersten dehydrate the lex then the kiersten is incipient. All aerophilic things are riled. If something heal the kiersten then the kiersten festoon the demetris. If the demetris heal the kiersten then the demetris dehydrate the kiersten. If something dehydrate the demetris then the demetris heal the lex. If something festoon the demetris and the demetris is unproven then the demetris heal the kiersten. The lex is riled.", "logic": "\nUnproven(demetris)\nHeal(kiersten, lex)\nFestoon(lex, demetris)\nforall x (Dehydrate(x, lex) -> Incipient(x))\nforall x (Ismaili(x) -> Festoon(x, lex))\nforall x (Heal(x, kiersten) and Dehydrate(kiersten, lex) -> Incipient(kiersten))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Heal(x, kiersten) -> Festoon(kiersten, demetris))\nHeal(demetris, kiersten) -> Dehydrate(demetris, kiersten)\nforall x (Dehydrate(x, demetris) -> Heal(demetris, lex))\nforall x (Festoon(x, demetris) and Unproven(demetris) -> Heal(demetris, kiersten))\n\nRiled(lex)\n\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Riled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The esmeralda is utilizable. The ashly gaze the peirce. The peirce parboil the esmeralda. If something program the peirce then it is artesian. If something is nugatory then it parboil the peirce. If something gaze the ashly and the ashly program the peirce then the ashly is artesian. All blowy things are thunderous. If something gaze the ashly then the ashly parboil the esmeralda. If the esmeralda gaze the ashly then the esmeralda program the ashly. If something program the esmeralda then the esmeralda gaze the peirce. If something parboil the esmeralda and the esmeralda is utilizable then the esmeralda gaze the ashly. The ashly is not thunderous.", "logic": "\nUtilizable(esmeralda)\nGaze(ashly, peirce)\nParboil(peirce, esmeralda)\nforall x (Program(x, peirce) -> Artesian(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Parboil(x, peirce))\nforall x (Gaze(x, ashly) and Program(ashly, peirce) -> Artesian(ashly))\nforall x (Blowy(x) -> Thunderous(x))\nforall x (Gaze(x, ashly) -> Parboil(ashly, esmeralda))\nGaze(esmeralda, ashly) -> Program(esmeralda, ashly)\nforall x (Program(x, esmeralda) -> Gaze(esmeralda, peirce))\nforall x (Parboil(x, esmeralda) and Utilizable(esmeralda) -> Gaze(esmeralda, ashly))\n\nnot Thunderous(ashly)\n\nforall x (Blowy(x) -> Thunderous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The verne is peltate. The janela subvent the tiffany. The tiffany mitigate the verne. If something skimp the tiffany then it is anuran. If something is bullate then it mitigate the tiffany. If something subvent the janela and the janela skimp the tiffany then the janela is anuran. All sapient things are dolabrate. If something subvent the janela then the janela mitigate the verne. If the verne subvent the janela then the verne skimp the janela. If something skimp the verne then the verne subvent the tiffany. If something mitigate the verne and the verne is peltate then the verne subvent the janela. The tiffany subvent the janela.", "logic": "\nPeltate(verne)\nSubvent(janela, tiffany)\nMitigate(tiffany, verne)\nforall x (Skimp(x, tiffany) -> Anuran(x))\nforall x (Bullate(x) -> Mitigate(x, tiffany))\nforall x (Subvent(x, janela) and Skimp(janela, tiffany) -> Anuran(janela))\nforall x (Sapient(x) -> Dolabrate(x))\nforall x (Subvent(x, janela) -> Mitigate(janela, verne))\nSubvent(verne, janela) -> Skimp(verne, janela)\nforall x (Skimp(x, verne) -> Subvent(verne, tiffany))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, verne) and Peltate(verne) -> Subvent(verne, janela))\n\nSubvent(tiffany, janela)\n\nSubvent(tiffany, janela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The anton is numidian. The aguste pigeonhole the emma. The emma recline the anton. If something dote the emma then it is aflame. If something is unbolted then it recline the emma. If something pigeonhole the aguste and the aguste dote the emma then the aguste is aflame. All ironic things are decurved. If something pigeonhole the aguste then the aguste recline the anton. If the anton pigeonhole the aguste then the anton dote the aguste. If something dote the anton then the anton pigeonhole the emma. If something recline the anton and the anton is numidian then the anton pigeonhole the aguste. The aguste does not visit the anton.", "logic": "\nNumidian(anton)\nPigeonhole(aguste, emma)\nRecline(emma, anton)\nforall x (Dote(x, emma) -> Aflame(x))\nforall x (Unbolted(x) -> Recline(x, emma))\nforall x (Pigeonhole(x, aguste) and Dote(aguste, emma) -> Aflame(aguste))\nforall x (Ironic(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Pigeonhole(x, aguste) -> Recline(aguste, anton))\nPigeonhole(anton, aguste) -> Dote(anton, aguste)\nforall x (Dote(x, anton) -> Pigeonhole(anton, emma))\nforall x (Recline(x, anton) and Numidian(anton) -> Pigeonhole(anton, aguste))\n\nnot Dote(aguste, anton)\n\nnot Dote(aguste, anton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "The ossie is nazi. The levin bitt the lind. The lind befall the ossie. If something broaden the lind then it is pouched. If something is keeled then it befall the lind. If something bitt the levin and the levin broaden the lind then the levin is pouched. All cupulate things are patchy. If something bitt the levin then the levin befall the ossie. If the ossie bitt the levin then the ossie broaden the levin. If something broaden the ossie then the ossie bitt the lind. If something befall the ossie and the ossie is nazi then the ossie bitt the levin. The lind is cupulate.", "logic": "\nNazi(ossie)\nBitt(levin, lind)\nBefall(lind, ossie)\nforall x (Broaden(x, lind) -> Pouched(x))\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Befall(x, lind))\nforall x (Bitt(x, levin) and Broaden(levin, lind) -> Pouched(levin))\nforall x (Cupulate(x) -> Patchy(x))\nforall x (Bitt(x, levin) -> Befall(levin, ossie))\nBitt(ossie, levin) -> Broaden(ossie, levin)\nforall x (Broaden(x, ossie) -> Bitt(ossie, lind))\nforall x (Befall(x, ossie) and Nazi(ossie) -> Bitt(ossie, levin))\n\nCupulate(lind)\n\nCupulate(lind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1072"} {"premises": "Darla is mannered. Dian is pale. Cathi is bootless. Smart people are mannered. Round, bootless people are diluvial. Darla is mannered.", "logic": "\nMannered(darla)\nPale(dian)\nBootless(cathi)\nforall x (Bootless(x) -> Mannered(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) and Bootless(x) -> Diluvial(x))\n\nMannered(darla)\n\ntherefore Mannered(darla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Colly is alkahestic. Storm is scarlet. Kathlin is lymphoid. Smart people are alkahestic. Round, lymphoid people are opaline. Kathlin is not lymphoid.", "logic": "\nAlkahestic(colly)\nScarlet(storm)\nLymphoid(kathlin)\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Alkahestic(x))\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) and Lymphoid(x) -> Opaline(x))\n\nnot Lymphoid(kathlin)\n\ntherefore Lymphoid(kathlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Alyssa is alive. Ira is webbed. Terrill is silvan. Smart people are alive. Round, silvan people are nilpotent. Terrill is alive.", "logic": "\nAlive(alyssa)\nWebbed(ira)\nSilvan(terrill)\nforall x (Silvan(x) -> Alive(x))\nforall x (Alive(x) and Silvan(x) -> Nilpotent(x))\n\nAlive(terrill)\n\nSilvan(terrill) and forall x (Silvan(x) -> Alive(x)) -> therefore Alive(terrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Kylynn is foodless. Mariette is adulatory. Silvie is slapdash. Smart people are foodless. Round, slapdash people are copasetic. Silvie is not foodless.", "logic": "\nFoodless(kylynn)\nAdulatory(mariette)\nSlapdash(silvie)\nforall x (Slapdash(x) -> Foodless(x))\nforall x (Foodless(x) and Slapdash(x) -> Copasetic(x))\n\nnot Foodless(silvie)\n\nSlapdash(silvie) and forall x (Slapdash(x) -> Foodless(x)) -> therefore Foodless(silvie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Caresse is penetrable. Norm is neurotoxic. Hobart is sordid. Smart people are penetrable. Round, sordid people are drafty. Hobart is drafty.", "logic": "\nPenetrable(caresse)\nNeurotoxic(norm)\nSordid(hobart)\nforall x (Sordid(x) -> Penetrable(x))\nforall x (Penetrable(x) and Sordid(x) -> Drafty(x))\n\nDrafty(hobart)\n\nSordid(hobart) and forall x (Sordid(x) -> Penetrable(x)) -> therefore Penetrable(hobart) Penetrable(hobart) and Sordid(hobart) and forall x (Penetrable(x) and Sordid(x) -> Drafty(x)) -> therefore Drafty(hobart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Cecilia is amiable. Janetta is vocal. Andrus is landless. Smart people are amiable. Round, landless people are blest. Andrus is not blest.", "logic": "\nAmiable(cecilia)\nVocal(janetta)\nLandless(andrus)\nforall x (Landless(x) -> Amiable(x))\nforall x (Amiable(x) and Landless(x) -> Blest(x))\n\nnot Blest(andrus)\n\nLandless(andrus) and forall x (Landless(x) -> Amiable(x)) -> therefore Amiable(andrus) Amiable(andrus) and Landless(andrus) and forall x (Amiable(x) and Landless(x) -> Blest(x)) -> therefore Blest(andrus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Ursulina is crashing. Frankie is charged. Jessa is disjoint. Smart people are crashing. Round, disjoint people are ideologic. Frankie is not crashing.", "logic": "\nCrashing(ursulina)\nCharged(frankie)\nDisjoint(jessa)\nforall x (Disjoint(x) -> Crashing(x))\nforall x (Crashing(x) and Disjoint(x) -> Ideologic(x))\n\nnot Crashing(frankie)\n\nforall x (Disjoint(x) -> Crashing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Candis is cyclical. Catherina is unvarying. Yolanda is unsavory. Smart people are cyclical. Round, unsavory people are calculated. Catherina is calculated.", "logic": "\nCyclical(candis)\nUnvarying(catherina)\nUnsavory(yolanda)\nforall x (Unsavory(x) -> Cyclical(x))\nforall x (Cyclical(x) and Unsavory(x) -> Calculated(x))\n\nCalculated(catherina)\n\nforall x (Cyclical(x) and Unsavory(x) -> Calculated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Evette is unpointed. Gerianna is bromidic. Jemmy is softheaded. Smart people are unpointed. Round, softheaded people are aspherical. Evette is not aspherical.", "logic": "\nUnpointed(evette)\nBromidic(gerianna)\nSoftheaded(jemmy)\nforall x (Softheaded(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) and Softheaded(x) -> Aspherical(x))\n\nnot Aspherical(evette)\n\nforall x (Unpointed(x) and Softheaded(x) -> Aspherical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Winton is hieratical. Tad is sheer. Adora is special. Smart people are hieratical. Round, special people are insurable. Adora is furry.", "logic": "\nHieratical(winton)\nSheer(tad)\nSpecial(adora)\nforall x (Special(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Special(x) -> Insurable(x))\n\nFurry(adora)\n\nFurry(adora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Althea is measured. Layton is contrasty. Doralin is ingrowing. Smart people are measured. Round, ingrowing people are archaistic. Althea is not furry.", "logic": "\nMeasured(althea)\nContrasty(layton)\nIngrowing(doralin)\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Measured(x))\nforall x (Measured(x) and Ingrowing(x) -> Archaistic(x))\n\nnot Furry(althea)\n\nnot Furry(althea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "Karissa is captious. Helga is mazy. Yancey is blessed. Smart people are captious. Round, blessed people are alular. Helga is furry.", "logic": "\nCaptious(karissa)\nMazy(helga)\nBlessed(yancey)\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> Captious(x))\nforall x (Captious(x) and Blessed(x) -> Alular(x))\n\nFurry(helga)\n\nFurry(helga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2349"} {"premises": "The cindi blub the jotham. The cindi blub the della. The cindi is nidifugous. The cindi slash the della. The jotham blub the cindi. The jotham blub the della. The jotham is asian. The jotham is not outrigged. The jotham slash the della. The jotham smut the cindi. The della is nidifugous. The della is not virginal. The della slash the cindi. The della slash the jotham. The della smut the cindi. If someone blub the della then they need the cindi. If the della blub the jotham then the della slash the jotham. If the cindi smut the della then the cindi slash the jotham. If someone slash the della and they are asian then the della smut the jotham. If the cindi slash the jotham then the jotham does not chase the cindi. If someone smut the jotham then the jotham smut the della. The della is nidifugous.", "logic": "\nBlub(cindi, jotham)\nBlub(cindi, della)\nNidifugous(cindi)\nSlash(cindi, della)\nBlub(jotham, cindi)\nBlub(jotham, della)\nAsian(jotham)\nnot Outrigged(jotham)\nSlash(jotham, della)\nSmut(jotham, cindi)\nNidifugous(della)\nnot Virginal(della)\nSlash(della, cindi)\nSlash(della, jotham)\nSmut(della, cindi)\nforall x (Blub(x, della) -> Smut(x, cindi))\nBlub(della, jotham) -> Slash(della, jotham)\nSmut(cindi, della) -> Slash(cindi, jotham)\nforall x (Slash(x, della) and Asian(x) -> Smut(della, jotham))\nSlash(cindi, jotham) -> not Blub(jotham, cindi)\nforall x (Smut(x, jotham) -> Smut(jotham, della))\n\nNidifugous(della)\n\ntherefore Nidifugous(della)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The penn tease the beau. The penn tease the maureene. The penn is texan. The penn guzzle the maureene. The beau tease the penn. The beau tease the maureene. The beau is fingerless. The beau is not misused. The beau guzzle the maureene. The beau trace the penn. The maureene is texan. The maureene is not empty. The maureene guzzle the penn. The maureene guzzle the beau. The maureene trace the penn. If someone tease the maureene then they need the penn. If the maureene tease the beau then the maureene guzzle the beau. If the penn trace the maureene then the penn guzzle the beau. If someone guzzle the maureene and they are fingerless then the maureene trace the beau. If the penn guzzle the beau then the beau does not chase the penn. If someone trace the beau then the beau trace the maureene. The penn does not like the maureene.", "logic": "\nTease(penn, beau)\nTease(penn, maureene)\nTexan(penn)\nGuzzle(penn, maureene)\nTease(beau, penn)\nTease(beau, maureene)\nFingerless(beau)\nnot Misused(beau)\nGuzzle(beau, maureene)\nTrace(beau, penn)\nTexan(maureene)\nnot Empty(maureene)\nGuzzle(maureene, penn)\nGuzzle(maureene, beau)\nTrace(maureene, penn)\nforall x (Tease(x, maureene) -> Trace(x, penn))\nTease(maureene, beau) -> Guzzle(maureene, beau)\nTrace(penn, maureene) -> Guzzle(penn, beau)\nforall x (Guzzle(x, maureene) and Fingerless(x) -> Trace(maureene, beau))\nGuzzle(penn, beau) -> not Tease(beau, penn)\nforall x (Trace(x, beau) -> Trace(beau, maureene))\n\nnot Guzzle(penn, maureene)\n\ntherefore Guzzle(penn, maureene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The clifford gluttonise the rolland. The clifford gluttonise the jacquetta. The clifford is piquant. The clifford infringe the jacquetta. The rolland gluttonise the clifford. The rolland gluttonise the jacquetta. The rolland is completed. The rolland is not lambent. The rolland infringe the jacquetta. The rolland signalize the clifford. The jacquetta is piquant. The jacquetta is not disquieted. The jacquetta infringe the clifford. The jacquetta infringe the rolland. The jacquetta signalize the clifford. If someone gluttonise the jacquetta then they need the clifford. If the jacquetta gluttonise the rolland then the jacquetta infringe the rolland. If the clifford signalize the jacquetta then the clifford infringe the rolland. If someone infringe the jacquetta and they are completed then the jacquetta signalize the rolland. If the clifford infringe the rolland then the rolland does not chase the clifford. If someone signalize the rolland then the rolland signalize the jacquetta. The jacquetta signalize the rolland.", "logic": "\nGluttonise(clifford, rolland)\nGluttonise(clifford, jacquetta)\nPiquant(clifford)\nInfringe(clifford, jacquetta)\nGluttonise(rolland, clifford)\nGluttonise(rolland, jacquetta)\nCompleted(rolland)\nnot Lambent(rolland)\nInfringe(rolland, jacquetta)\nSignalize(rolland, clifford)\nPiquant(jacquetta)\nnot Disquieted(jacquetta)\nInfringe(jacquetta, clifford)\nInfringe(jacquetta, rolland)\nSignalize(jacquetta, clifford)\nforall x (Gluttonise(x, jacquetta) -> Signalize(x, clifford))\nGluttonise(jacquetta, rolland) -> Infringe(jacquetta, rolland)\nSignalize(clifford, jacquetta) -> Infringe(clifford, rolland)\nforall x (Infringe(x, jacquetta) and Completed(x) -> Signalize(jacquetta, rolland))\nInfringe(clifford, rolland) -> not Gluttonise(rolland, clifford)\nforall x (Signalize(x, rolland) -> Signalize(rolland, jacquetta))\n\nSignalize(jacquetta, rolland)\n\nInfringe(rolland, jacquetta) and Completed(rolland) and forall x (Infringe(x, jacquetta) and Completed(x) -> Signalize(jacquetta, rolland)) -> therefore Signalize(jacquetta, rolland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The reece espy the shara. The reece espy the cherilynn. The reece is flabby. The reece brook the cherilynn. The shara espy the reece. The shara espy the cherilynn. The shara is scarce. The shara is not preteen. The shara brook the cherilynn. The shara chord the reece. The cherilynn is flabby. The cherilynn is not vexed. The cherilynn brook the reece. The cherilynn brook the shara. The cherilynn chord the reece. If someone espy the cherilynn then they need the reece. If the cherilynn espy the shara then the cherilynn brook the shara. If the reece chord the cherilynn then the reece brook the shara. If someone brook the cherilynn and they are scarce then the cherilynn chord the shara. If the reece brook the shara then the shara does not chase the reece. If someone chord the shara then the shara chord the cherilynn. The cherilynn does not need the shara.", "logic": "\nEspy(reece, shara)\nEspy(reece, cherilynn)\nFlabby(reece)\nBrook(reece, cherilynn)\nEspy(shara, reece)\nEspy(shara, cherilynn)\nScarce(shara)\nnot Preteen(shara)\nBrook(shara, cherilynn)\nChord(shara, reece)\nFlabby(cherilynn)\nnot Vexed(cherilynn)\nBrook(cherilynn, reece)\nBrook(cherilynn, shara)\nChord(cherilynn, reece)\nforall x (Espy(x, cherilynn) -> Chord(x, reece))\nEspy(cherilynn, shara) -> Brook(cherilynn, shara)\nChord(reece, cherilynn) -> Brook(reece, shara)\nforall x (Brook(x, cherilynn) and Scarce(x) -> Chord(cherilynn, shara))\nBrook(reece, shara) -> not Espy(shara, reece)\nforall x (Chord(x, shara) -> Chord(shara, cherilynn))\n\nnot Chord(cherilynn, shara)\n\nBrook(shara, cherilynn) and Scarce(shara) and forall x (Brook(x, cherilynn) and Scarce(x) -> Chord(cherilynn, shara)) -> therefore Chord(cherilynn, shara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The torin supinate the leone. The torin supinate the emeline. The torin is equestrian. The torin radicalize the emeline. The leone supinate the torin. The leone supinate the emeline. The leone is butcherly. The leone is not ripe. The leone radicalize the emeline. The leone harlequin the torin. The emeline is equestrian. The emeline is not useless. The emeline radicalize the torin. The emeline radicalize the leone. The emeline harlequin the torin. If someone supinate the emeline then they need the torin. If the emeline supinate the leone then the emeline radicalize the leone. If the torin harlequin the emeline then the torin radicalize the leone. If someone radicalize the emeline and they are butcherly then the emeline harlequin the leone. If the torin radicalize the leone then the leone does not chase the torin. If someone harlequin the leone then the leone harlequin the emeline. The leone harlequin the emeline.", "logic": "\nSupinate(torin, leone)\nSupinate(torin, emeline)\nEquestrian(torin)\nRadicalize(torin, emeline)\nSupinate(leone, torin)\nSupinate(leone, emeline)\nButcherly(leone)\nnot Ripe(leone)\nRadicalize(leone, emeline)\nHarlequin(leone, torin)\nEquestrian(emeline)\nnot Useless(emeline)\nRadicalize(emeline, torin)\nRadicalize(emeline, leone)\nHarlequin(emeline, torin)\nforall x (Supinate(x, emeline) -> Harlequin(x, torin))\nSupinate(emeline, leone) -> Radicalize(emeline, leone)\nHarlequin(torin, emeline) -> Radicalize(torin, leone)\nforall x (Radicalize(x, emeline) and Butcherly(x) -> Harlequin(emeline, leone))\nRadicalize(torin, leone) -> not Supinate(leone, torin)\nforall x (Harlequin(x, leone) -> Harlequin(leone, emeline))\n\nHarlequin(leone, emeline)\n\nRadicalize(leone, emeline) and Butcherly(leone) and forall x (Radicalize(x, emeline) and Butcherly(x) -> Harlequin(emeline, leone)) -> therefore Harlequin(emeline, leone) Harlequin(emeline, leone) and forall x (Harlequin(x, leone) -> Harlequin(leone, emeline)) -> therefore Harlequin(leone, emeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The cyndi debouch the wyatan. The cyndi debouch the dabney. The cyndi is scandalous. The cyndi acquire the dabney. The wyatan debouch the cyndi. The wyatan debouch the dabney. The wyatan is panicky. The wyatan is not lengthened. The wyatan acquire the dabney. The wyatan photocopy the cyndi. The dabney is scandalous. The dabney is not glamourous. The dabney acquire the cyndi. The dabney acquire the wyatan. The dabney photocopy the cyndi. If someone debouch the dabney then they need the cyndi. If the dabney debouch the wyatan then the dabney acquire the wyatan. If the cyndi photocopy the dabney then the cyndi acquire the wyatan. If someone acquire the dabney and they are panicky then the dabney photocopy the wyatan. If the cyndi acquire the wyatan then the wyatan does not chase the cyndi. If someone photocopy the wyatan then the wyatan photocopy the dabney. The wyatan does not need the dabney.", "logic": "\nDebouch(cyndi, wyatan)\nDebouch(cyndi, dabney)\nScandalous(cyndi)\nAcquire(cyndi, dabney)\nDebouch(wyatan, cyndi)\nDebouch(wyatan, dabney)\nPanicky(wyatan)\nnot Lengthened(wyatan)\nAcquire(wyatan, dabney)\nPhotocopy(wyatan, cyndi)\nScandalous(dabney)\nnot Glamourous(dabney)\nAcquire(dabney, cyndi)\nAcquire(dabney, wyatan)\nPhotocopy(dabney, cyndi)\nforall x (Debouch(x, dabney) -> Photocopy(x, cyndi))\nDebouch(dabney, wyatan) -> Acquire(dabney, wyatan)\nPhotocopy(cyndi, dabney) -> Acquire(cyndi, wyatan)\nforall x (Acquire(x, dabney) and Panicky(x) -> Photocopy(dabney, wyatan))\nAcquire(cyndi, wyatan) -> not Debouch(wyatan, cyndi)\nforall x (Photocopy(x, wyatan) -> Photocopy(wyatan, dabney))\n\nnot Photocopy(wyatan, dabney)\n\nAcquire(wyatan, dabney) and Panicky(wyatan) and forall x (Acquire(x, dabney) and Panicky(x) -> Photocopy(dabney, wyatan)) -> therefore Photocopy(dabney, wyatan) Photocopy(dabney, wyatan) and forall x (Photocopy(x, wyatan) -> Photocopy(wyatan, dabney)) -> therefore Photocopy(wyatan, dabney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The anallese rectify the wilbert. The anallese rectify the ada. The anallese is tricksy. The anallese hygienise the ada. The wilbert rectify the anallese. The wilbert rectify the ada. The wilbert is diestrous. The wilbert is not howling. The wilbert hygienise the ada. The wilbert trivialise the anallese. The ada is tricksy. The ada is not unvigilant. The ada hygienise the anallese. The ada hygienise the wilbert. The ada trivialise the anallese. If someone rectify the ada then they need the anallese. If the ada rectify the wilbert then the ada hygienise the wilbert. If the anallese trivialise the ada then the anallese hygienise the wilbert. If someone hygienise the ada and they are diestrous then the ada trivialise the wilbert. If the anallese hygienise the wilbert then the wilbert does not chase the anallese. If someone trivialise the wilbert then the wilbert trivialise the ada. The anallese does not like the wilbert.", "logic": "\nRectify(anallese, wilbert)\nRectify(anallese, ada)\nTricksy(anallese)\nHygienise(anallese, ada)\nRectify(wilbert, anallese)\nRectify(wilbert, ada)\nDiestrous(wilbert)\nnot Howling(wilbert)\nHygienise(wilbert, ada)\nTrivialise(wilbert, anallese)\nTricksy(ada)\nnot Unvigilant(ada)\nHygienise(ada, anallese)\nHygienise(ada, wilbert)\nTrivialise(ada, anallese)\nforall x (Rectify(x, ada) -> Trivialise(x, anallese))\nRectify(ada, wilbert) -> Hygienise(ada, wilbert)\nTrivialise(anallese, ada) -> Hygienise(anallese, wilbert)\nforall x (Hygienise(x, ada) and Diestrous(x) -> Trivialise(ada, wilbert))\nHygienise(anallese, wilbert) -> not Rectify(wilbert, anallese)\nforall x (Trivialise(x, wilbert) -> Trivialise(wilbert, ada))\n\nnot Hygienise(anallese, wilbert)\n\nTrivialise(anallese, ada) -> Hygienise(anallese, wilbert) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The lenka bill the frankie. The lenka bill the jessamine. The lenka is snarled. The lenka blurt the jessamine. The frankie bill the lenka. The frankie bill the jessamine. The frankie is answering. The frankie is not defiled. The frankie blurt the jessamine. The frankie bestir the lenka. The jessamine is snarled. The jessamine is not perfidious. The jessamine blurt the lenka. The jessamine blurt the frankie. The jessamine bestir the lenka. If someone bill the jessamine then they need the lenka. If the jessamine bill the frankie then the jessamine blurt the frankie. If the lenka bestir the jessamine then the lenka blurt the frankie. If someone blurt the jessamine and they are answering then the jessamine bestir the frankie. If the lenka blurt the frankie then the frankie does not chase the lenka. If someone bestir the frankie then the frankie bestir the jessamine. The lenka blurt the lenka.", "logic": "\nBill(lenka, frankie)\nBill(lenka, jessamine)\nSnarled(lenka)\nBlurt(lenka, jessamine)\nBill(frankie, lenka)\nBill(frankie, jessamine)\nAnswering(frankie)\nnot Defiled(frankie)\nBlurt(frankie, jessamine)\nBestir(frankie, lenka)\nSnarled(jessamine)\nnot Perfidious(jessamine)\nBlurt(jessamine, lenka)\nBlurt(jessamine, frankie)\nBestir(jessamine, lenka)\nforall x (Bill(x, jessamine) -> Bestir(x, lenka))\nBill(jessamine, frankie) -> Blurt(jessamine, frankie)\nBestir(lenka, jessamine) -> Blurt(lenka, frankie)\nforall x (Blurt(x, jessamine) and Answering(x) -> Bestir(jessamine, frankie))\nBlurt(lenka, frankie) -> not Bill(frankie, lenka)\nforall x (Bestir(x, frankie) -> Bestir(frankie, jessamine))\n\nBlurt(lenka, lenka)\n\nBlurt(lenka, lenka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The helena bushwhack the welsh. The helena bushwhack the orelee. The helena is vendible. The helena splosh the orelee. The welsh bushwhack the helena. The welsh bushwhack the orelee. The welsh is editorial. The welsh is not ciliated. The welsh splosh the orelee. The welsh hock the helena. The orelee is vendible. The orelee is not mercurous. The orelee splosh the helena. The orelee splosh the welsh. The orelee hock the helena. If someone bushwhack the orelee then they need the helena. If the orelee bushwhack the welsh then the orelee splosh the welsh. If the helena hock the orelee then the helena splosh the welsh. If someone splosh the orelee and they are editorial then the orelee hock the welsh. If the helena splosh the welsh then the welsh does not chase the helena. If someone hock the welsh then the welsh hock the orelee. The helena is not editorial.", "logic": "\nBushwhack(helena, welsh)\nBushwhack(helena, orelee)\nVendible(helena)\nSplosh(helena, orelee)\nBushwhack(welsh, helena)\nBushwhack(welsh, orelee)\nEditorial(welsh)\nnot Ciliated(welsh)\nSplosh(welsh, orelee)\nHock(welsh, helena)\nVendible(orelee)\nnot Mercurous(orelee)\nSplosh(orelee, helena)\nSplosh(orelee, welsh)\nHock(orelee, helena)\nforall x (Bushwhack(x, orelee) -> Hock(x, helena))\nBushwhack(orelee, welsh) -> Splosh(orelee, welsh)\nHock(helena, orelee) -> Splosh(helena, welsh)\nforall x (Splosh(x, orelee) and Editorial(x) -> Hock(orelee, welsh))\nSplosh(helena, welsh) -> not Bushwhack(welsh, helena)\nforall x (Hock(x, welsh) -> Hock(welsh, orelee))\n\nnot Editorial(helena)\n\nnot Editorial(helena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The shorty outsell the prasun. The shorty outsell the isabella. The shorty is ensuant. The shorty export the isabella. The prasun outsell the shorty. The prasun outsell the isabella. The prasun is unbiassed. The prasun is not riparian. The prasun export the isabella. The prasun acidulate the shorty. The isabella is ensuant. The isabella is not durable. The isabella export the shorty. The isabella export the prasun. The isabella acidulate the shorty. If someone outsell the isabella then they need the shorty. If the isabella outsell the prasun then the isabella export the prasun. If the shorty acidulate the isabella then the shorty export the prasun. If someone export the isabella and they are unbiassed then the isabella acidulate the prasun. If the shorty export the prasun then the prasun does not chase the shorty. If someone acidulate the prasun then the prasun acidulate the isabella. The isabella acidulate the isabella.", "logic": "\nOutsell(shorty, prasun)\nOutsell(shorty, isabella)\nEnsuant(shorty)\nExport(shorty, isabella)\nOutsell(prasun, shorty)\nOutsell(prasun, isabella)\nUnbiassed(prasun)\nnot Riparian(prasun)\nExport(prasun, isabella)\nAcidulate(prasun, shorty)\nEnsuant(isabella)\nnot Durable(isabella)\nExport(isabella, shorty)\nExport(isabella, prasun)\nAcidulate(isabella, shorty)\nforall x (Outsell(x, isabella) -> Acidulate(x, shorty))\nOutsell(isabella, prasun) -> Export(isabella, prasun)\nAcidulate(shorty, isabella) -> Export(shorty, prasun)\nforall x (Export(x, isabella) and Unbiassed(x) -> Acidulate(isabella, prasun))\nExport(shorty, prasun) -> not Outsell(prasun, shorty)\nforall x (Acidulate(x, prasun) -> Acidulate(prasun, isabella))\n\nAcidulate(isabella, isabella)\n\nAcidulate(isabella, isabella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The stesha spar the camel. The stesha spar the roxine. The stesha is mannish. The stesha ablactate the roxine. The camel spar the stesha. The camel spar the roxine. The camel is oxidized. The camel is not abreast. The camel ablactate the roxine. The camel lounge the stesha. The roxine is mannish. The roxine is not hiemal. The roxine ablactate the stesha. The roxine ablactate the camel. The roxine lounge the stesha. If someone spar the roxine then they need the stesha. If the roxine spar the camel then the roxine ablactate the camel. If the stesha lounge the roxine then the stesha ablactate the camel. If someone ablactate the roxine and they are oxidized then the roxine lounge the camel. If the stesha ablactate the camel then the camel does not chase the stesha. If someone lounge the camel then the camel lounge the roxine. The stesha is not nice.", "logic": "\nSpar(stesha, camel)\nSpar(stesha, roxine)\nMannish(stesha)\nAblactate(stesha, roxine)\nSpar(camel, stesha)\nSpar(camel, roxine)\nOxidized(camel)\nnot Abreast(camel)\nAblactate(camel, roxine)\nLounge(camel, stesha)\nMannish(roxine)\nnot Hiemal(roxine)\nAblactate(roxine, stesha)\nAblactate(roxine, camel)\nLounge(roxine, stesha)\nforall x (Spar(x, roxine) -> Lounge(x, stesha))\nSpar(roxine, camel) -> Ablactate(roxine, camel)\nLounge(stesha, roxine) -> Ablactate(stesha, camel)\nforall x (Ablactate(x, roxine) and Oxidized(x) -> Lounge(roxine, camel))\nAblactate(stesha, camel) -> not Spar(camel, stesha)\nforall x (Lounge(x, camel) -> Lounge(camel, roxine))\n\nnot Nice(stesha)\n\nnot Nice(stesha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The kimberli skirmish the duffy. The kimberli skirmish the aharon. The kimberli is parochial. The kimberli screen the aharon. The duffy skirmish the kimberli. The duffy skirmish the aharon. The duffy is injectable. The duffy is not occlusive. The duffy screen the aharon. The duffy stencil the kimberli. The aharon is parochial. The aharon is not wavelike. The aharon screen the kimberli. The aharon screen the duffy. The aharon stencil the kimberli. If someone skirmish the aharon then they need the kimberli. If the aharon skirmish the duffy then the aharon screen the duffy. If the kimberli stencil the aharon then the kimberli screen the duffy. If someone screen the aharon and they are injectable then the aharon stencil the duffy. If the kimberli screen the duffy then the duffy does not chase the kimberli. If someone stencil the duffy then the duffy stencil the aharon. The aharon is nice.", "logic": "\nSkirmish(kimberli, duffy)\nSkirmish(kimberli, aharon)\nParochial(kimberli)\nScreen(kimberli, aharon)\nSkirmish(duffy, kimberli)\nSkirmish(duffy, aharon)\nInjectable(duffy)\nnot Occlusive(duffy)\nScreen(duffy, aharon)\nStencil(duffy, kimberli)\nParochial(aharon)\nnot Wavelike(aharon)\nScreen(aharon, kimberli)\nScreen(aharon, duffy)\nStencil(aharon, kimberli)\nforall x (Skirmish(x, aharon) -> Stencil(x, kimberli))\nSkirmish(aharon, duffy) -> Screen(aharon, duffy)\nStencil(kimberli, aharon) -> Screen(kimberli, duffy)\nforall x (Screen(x, aharon) and Injectable(x) -> Stencil(aharon, duffy))\nScreen(kimberli, duffy) -> not Skirmish(duffy, kimberli)\nforall x (Stencil(x, duffy) -> Stencil(duffy, aharon))\n\nNice(aharon)\n\nNice(aharon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The sidney is fluid. The sidney manoeuvre the sabine. The jehanna is spidery. The jehanna manoeuvre the sabine. The sabine is spidery. The sabine candy the sidney. The sabine manoeuvre the jehanna. If something is overlooked then it does not like the sidney. If something candy the jehanna and it manoeuvre the sabine then the jehanna disband the sabine. If something is spidery then it candy the jehanna. The sidney is fluid.", "logic": "\nFluid(sidney)\nManoeuvre(sidney, sabine)\nSpidery(jehanna)\nManoeuvre(jehanna, sabine)\nSpidery(sabine)\nCandy(sabine, sidney)\nManoeuvre(sabine, jehanna)\nforall x (Overlooked(x) -> not Candy(x, sidney))\nforall x (Candy(x, jehanna) and Manoeuvre(x, sabine) -> Disband(jehanna, sabine))\nforall x (Spidery(x) -> Candy(x, jehanna))\n\nFluid(sidney)\n\ntherefore Fluid(sidney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The walt is expectant. The walt descale the jada. The nichole is shorthand. The nichole descale the jada. The jada is shorthand. The jada damn the walt. The jada descale the nichole. If something is undraped then it does not like the walt. If something damn the nichole and it descale the jada then the nichole hive the jada. If something is shorthand then it damn the nichole. The jada does not visit the nichole.", "logic": "\nExpectant(walt)\nDescale(walt, jada)\nShorthand(nichole)\nDescale(nichole, jada)\nShorthand(jada)\nDamn(jada, walt)\nDescale(jada, nichole)\nforall x (Undraped(x) -> not Damn(x, walt))\nforall x (Damn(x, nichole) and Descale(x, jada) -> Hive(nichole, jada))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) -> Damn(x, nichole))\n\nnot Descale(jada, nichole)\n\ntherefore Descale(jada, nichole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The koressa is uninspired. The koressa supinate the jonie. The fletcher is alleged. The fletcher supinate the jonie. The jonie is alleged. The jonie nettle the koressa. The jonie supinate the fletcher. If something is zapotec then it does not like the koressa. If something nettle the fletcher and it supinate the jonie then the fletcher glare the jonie. If something is alleged then it nettle the fletcher. The fletcher nettle the fletcher.", "logic": "\nUninspired(koressa)\nSupinate(koressa, jonie)\nAlleged(fletcher)\nSupinate(fletcher, jonie)\nAlleged(jonie)\nNettle(jonie, koressa)\nSupinate(jonie, fletcher)\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> not Nettle(x, koressa))\nforall x (Nettle(x, fletcher) and Supinate(x, jonie) -> Glare(fletcher, jonie))\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Nettle(x, fletcher))\n\nNettle(fletcher, fletcher)\n\nAlleged(fletcher) and forall x (Alleged(x) -> Nettle(x, fletcher)) -> therefore Nettle(fletcher, fletcher)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The timi is slubbed. The timi double the solange. The marty is abdicable. The marty double the solange. The solange is abdicable. The solange favor the timi. The solange double the marty. If something is unstated then it does not like the timi. If something favor the marty and it double the solange then the marty exile the solange. If something is abdicable then it favor the marty. The solange does not like the marty.", "logic": "\nSlubbed(timi)\nDouble(timi, solange)\nAbdicable(marty)\nDouble(marty, solange)\nAbdicable(solange)\nFavor(solange, timi)\nDouble(solange, marty)\nforall x (Unstated(x) -> not Favor(x, timi))\nforall x (Favor(x, marty) and Double(x, solange) -> Exile(marty, solange))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) -> Favor(x, marty))\n\nnot Favor(solange, marty)\n\nAbdicable(solange) and forall x (Abdicable(x) -> Favor(x, marty)) -> therefore Favor(solange, marty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The quintus is succinct. The quintus faze the emma. The kai is hereditary. The kai faze the emma. The emma is hereditary. The emma drivel the quintus. The emma faze the kai. If something is meshed then it does not like the quintus. If something drivel the kai and it faze the emma then the kai overawe the emma. If something is hereditary then it drivel the kai. The kai overawe the emma.", "logic": "\nSuccinct(quintus)\nFaze(quintus, emma)\nHereditary(kai)\nFaze(kai, emma)\nHereditary(emma)\nDrivel(emma, quintus)\nFaze(emma, kai)\nforall x (Meshed(x) -> not Drivel(x, quintus))\nforall x (Drivel(x, kai) and Faze(x, emma) -> Overawe(kai, emma))\nforall x (Hereditary(x) -> Drivel(x, kai))\n\nOverawe(kai, emma)\n\nHereditary(kai) and forall x (Hereditary(x) -> Drivel(x, kai)) -> therefore Drivel(kai, kai) Drivel(kai, kai) and Faze(kai, emma) and forall x (Drivel(x, kai) and Faze(x, emma) -> Overawe(kai, emma)) -> therefore Overawe(kai, emma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The guinna is hundred. The guinna vaporise the annalyse. The vite is apocrine. The vite vaporise the annalyse. The annalyse is apocrine. The annalyse swank the guinna. The annalyse vaporise the vite. If something is decent then it does not like the guinna. If something swank the vite and it vaporise the annalyse then the vite homologize the annalyse. If something is apocrine then it swank the vite. The vite does not see the annalyse.", "logic": "\nHundred(guinna)\nVaporise(guinna, annalyse)\nApocrine(vite)\nVaporise(vite, annalyse)\nApocrine(annalyse)\nSwank(annalyse, guinna)\nVaporise(annalyse, vite)\nforall x (Decent(x) -> not Swank(x, guinna))\nforall x (Swank(x, vite) and Vaporise(x, annalyse) -> Homologize(vite, annalyse))\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> Swank(x, vite))\n\nnot Homologize(vite, annalyse)\n\nApocrine(vite) and forall x (Apocrine(x) -> Swank(x, vite)) -> therefore Swank(vite, vite) Swank(vite, vite) and Vaporise(vite, annalyse) and forall x (Swank(x, vite) and Vaporise(x, annalyse) -> Homologize(vite, annalyse)) -> therefore Homologize(vite, annalyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The kimberly is paperback. The kimberly headbutt the dawson. The zacharie is binominal. The zacharie headbutt the dawson. The dawson is binominal. The dawson efface the kimberly. The dawson headbutt the zacharie. If something is efficient then it does not like the kimberly. If something efface the zacharie and it headbutt the dawson then the zacharie jazz the dawson. If something is binominal then it efface the zacharie. The kimberly does not like the zacharie.", "logic": "\nPaperback(kimberly)\nHeadbutt(kimberly, dawson)\nBinominal(zacharie)\nHeadbutt(zacharie, dawson)\nBinominal(dawson)\nEfface(dawson, kimberly)\nHeadbutt(dawson, zacharie)\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> not Efface(x, kimberly))\nforall x (Efface(x, zacharie) and Headbutt(x, dawson) -> Jazz(zacharie, dawson))\nforall x (Binominal(x) -> Efface(x, zacharie))\n\nnot Efface(kimberly, zacharie)\n\nforall x (Binominal(x) -> Efface(x, zacharie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The theodore is breasted. The theodore pacify the rebbecca. The art is perirhinal. The art pacify the rebbecca. The rebbecca is perirhinal. The rebbecca calliper the theodore. The rebbecca pacify the art. If something is conceited then it does not like the theodore. If something calliper the art and it pacify the rebbecca then the art single the rebbecca. If something is perirhinal then it calliper the art. The rebbecca single the art.", "logic": "\nBreasted(theodore)\nPacify(theodore, rebbecca)\nPerirhinal(art)\nPacify(art, rebbecca)\nPerirhinal(rebbecca)\nCalliper(rebbecca, theodore)\nPacify(rebbecca, art)\nforall x (Conceited(x) -> not Calliper(x, theodore))\nforall x (Calliper(x, art) and Pacify(x, rebbecca) -> Single(art, rebbecca))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Calliper(x, art))\n\nSingle(rebbecca, art)\n\nSingle(rebbecca, art) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The corinna is mushy. The corinna pearl the kylila. The constanta is purblind. The constanta pearl the kylila. The kylila is purblind. The kylila dinge the corinna. The kylila pearl the constanta. If something is piddling then it does not like the corinna. If something dinge the constanta and it pearl the kylila then the constanta snitch the kylila. If something is purblind then it dinge the constanta. The kylila does not see the corinna.", "logic": "\nMushy(corinna)\nPearl(corinna, kylila)\nPurblind(constanta)\nPearl(constanta, kylila)\nPurblind(kylila)\nDinge(kylila, corinna)\nPearl(kylila, constanta)\nforall x (Piddling(x) -> not Dinge(x, corinna))\nforall x (Dinge(x, constanta) and Pearl(x, kylila) -> Snitch(constanta, kylila))\nforall x (Purblind(x) -> Dinge(x, constanta))\n\nnot Snitch(kylila, corinna)\n\nnot Snitch(kylila, corinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The rachael is sloppy. The rachael sightsing the wrennie. The imelda is unloving. The imelda sightsing the wrennie. The wrennie is unloving. The wrennie indent the rachael. The wrennie sightsing the imelda. If something is affixed then it does not like the rachael. If something indent the imelda and it sightsing the wrennie then the imelda confound the wrennie. If something is unloving then it indent the imelda. The rachael sightsing the imelda.", "logic": "\nSloppy(rachael)\nSightsing(rachael, wrennie)\nUnloving(imelda)\nSightsing(imelda, wrennie)\nUnloving(wrennie)\nIndent(wrennie, rachael)\nSightsing(wrennie, imelda)\nforall x (Affixed(x) -> not Indent(x, rachael))\nforall x (Indent(x, imelda) and Sightsing(x, wrennie) -> Confound(imelda, wrennie))\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Indent(x, imelda))\n\nSightsing(rachael, imelda)\n\nSightsing(rachael, imelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The josephina is pitiless. The josephina bechance the hamel. The gisela is obsolete. The gisela bechance the hamel. The hamel is obsolete. The hamel reface the josephina. The hamel bechance the gisela. If something is slopped then it does not like the josephina. If something reface the gisela and it bechance the hamel then the gisela conform the hamel. If something is obsolete then it reface the gisela. The gisela does not visit the josephina.", "logic": "\nPitiless(josephina)\nBechance(josephina, hamel)\nObsolete(gisela)\nBechance(gisela, hamel)\nObsolete(hamel)\nReface(hamel, josephina)\nBechance(hamel, gisela)\nforall x (Slopped(x) -> not Reface(x, josephina))\nforall x (Reface(x, gisela) and Bechance(x, hamel) -> Conform(gisela, hamel))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) -> Reface(x, gisela))\n\nnot Bechance(gisela, josephina)\n\nnot Bechance(gisela, josephina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The elsey is campanular. The elsey crackle the garvey. The leslie is verified. The leslie crackle the garvey. The garvey is verified. The garvey snigger the elsey. The garvey crackle the leslie. If something is huddled then it does not like the elsey. If something snigger the leslie and it crackle the garvey then the leslie effervesce the garvey. If something is verified then it snigger the leslie. The garvey is round.", "logic": "\nCampanular(elsey)\nCrackle(elsey, garvey)\nVerified(leslie)\nCrackle(leslie, garvey)\nVerified(garvey)\nSnigger(garvey, elsey)\nCrackle(garvey, leslie)\nforall x (Huddled(x) -> not Snigger(x, elsey))\nforall x (Snigger(x, leslie) and Crackle(x, garvey) -> Effervesce(leslie, garvey))\nforall x (Verified(x) -> Snigger(x, leslie))\n\nRound(garvey)\n\nRound(garvey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-716"} {"premises": "The isaac comment the thaddeus. The isaac is auburn. The isaac is cereal. The isaac is afrikaner. The isaac cremate the thaddeus. The isaac straighten the thaddeus. The thaddeus comment the isaac. The thaddeus is auburn. The thaddeus is niffy. The thaddeus is afrikaner. The thaddeus cremate the isaac. The thaddeus straighten the isaac. If something is cereal and it straighten the isaac then the isaac straighten the thaddeus. If the isaac cremate the thaddeus and the thaddeus is cereal then the isaac is afrikaner. If something cremate the thaddeus and it comment the isaac then it straighten the thaddeus. If something is niffy and it straighten the thaddeus then it straighten the isaac. If something cremate the thaddeus and the thaddeus comment the isaac then the isaac cremate the thaddeus. If something is cereal and afrikaner then it cremate the isaac. If the isaac cremate the thaddeus and the isaac is auburn then the thaddeus comment the isaac. If something straighten the thaddeus then it is niffy. The isaac is cereal.", "logic": "\nComment(isaac, thaddeus)\nAuburn(isaac)\nCereal(isaac)\nAfrikaner(isaac)\nCremate(isaac, thaddeus)\nStraighten(isaac, thaddeus)\nComment(thaddeus, isaac)\nAuburn(thaddeus)\nNiffy(thaddeus)\nAfrikaner(thaddeus)\nCremate(thaddeus, isaac)\nStraighten(thaddeus, isaac)\nforall x (Cereal(x) and Straighten(x, isaac) -> Straighten(isaac, thaddeus))\nCremate(isaac, thaddeus) and Cereal(thaddeus) -> Afrikaner(isaac)\nforall x (Cremate(x, thaddeus) and Comment(x, isaac) -> Straighten(x, thaddeus))\nforall x (Niffy(x) and Straighten(x, thaddeus) -> Straighten(x, isaac))\nforall x (Cremate(x, thaddeus) and Comment(thaddeus, isaac) -> Cremate(isaac, thaddeus))\nforall x (Cereal(x) and Afrikaner(x) -> Cremate(x, isaac))\nCremate(isaac, thaddeus) and Auburn(isaac) -> Comment(thaddeus, isaac)\nforall x (Straighten(x, thaddeus) -> Niffy(x))\n\nCereal(isaac)\n\ntherefore Cereal(isaac)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The lucila intrude the coreen. The lucila is related. The lucila is comical. The lucila is drawn. The lucila outsource the coreen. The lucila rope the coreen. The coreen intrude the lucila. The coreen is related. The coreen is ornery. The coreen is drawn. The coreen outsource the lucila. The coreen rope the lucila. If something is comical and it rope the lucila then the lucila rope the coreen. If the lucila outsource the coreen and the coreen is comical then the lucila is drawn. If something outsource the coreen and it intrude the lucila then it rope the coreen. If something is ornery and it rope the coreen then it rope the lucila. If something outsource the coreen and the coreen intrude the lucila then the lucila outsource the coreen. If something is comical and drawn then it outsource the lucila. If the lucila outsource the coreen and the lucila is related then the coreen intrude the lucila. If something rope the coreen then it is ornery. The lucila is not related.", "logic": "\nIntrude(lucila, coreen)\nRelated(lucila)\nComical(lucila)\nDrawn(lucila)\nOutsource(lucila, coreen)\nRope(lucila, coreen)\nIntrude(coreen, lucila)\nRelated(coreen)\nOrnery(coreen)\nDrawn(coreen)\nOutsource(coreen, lucila)\nRope(coreen, lucila)\nforall x (Comical(x) and Rope(x, lucila) -> Rope(lucila, coreen))\nOutsource(lucila, coreen) and Comical(coreen) -> Drawn(lucila)\nforall x (Outsource(x, coreen) and Intrude(x, lucila) -> Rope(x, coreen))\nforall x (Ornery(x) and Rope(x, coreen) -> Rope(x, lucila))\nforall x (Outsource(x, coreen) and Intrude(coreen, lucila) -> Outsource(lucila, coreen))\nforall x (Comical(x) and Drawn(x) -> Outsource(x, lucila))\nOutsource(lucila, coreen) and Related(lucila) -> Intrude(coreen, lucila)\nforall x (Rope(x, coreen) -> Ornery(x))\n\nnot Related(lucila)\n\ntherefore Related(lucila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The ivett blacklist the neal. The ivett is deflective. The ivett is windburned. The ivett is twee. The ivett wander the neal. The ivett enthral the neal. The neal blacklist the ivett. The neal is deflective. The neal is crazed. The neal is twee. The neal wander the ivett. The neal enthral the ivett. If something is windburned and it enthral the ivett then the ivett enthral the neal. If the ivett wander the neal and the neal is windburned then the ivett is twee. If something wander the neal and it blacklist the ivett then it enthral the neal. If something is crazed and it enthral the neal then it enthral the ivett. If something wander the neal and the neal blacklist the ivett then the ivett wander the neal. If something is windburned and twee then it wander the ivett. If the ivett wander the neal and the ivett is deflective then the neal blacklist the ivett. If something enthral the neal then it is crazed. The ivett is crazed.", "logic": "\nBlacklist(ivett, neal)\nDeflective(ivett)\nWindburned(ivett)\nTwee(ivett)\nWander(ivett, neal)\nEnthral(ivett, neal)\nBlacklist(neal, ivett)\nDeflective(neal)\nCrazed(neal)\nTwee(neal)\nWander(neal, ivett)\nEnthral(neal, ivett)\nforall x (Windburned(x) and Enthral(x, ivett) -> Enthral(ivett, neal))\nWander(ivett, neal) and Windburned(neal) -> Twee(ivett)\nforall x (Wander(x, neal) and Blacklist(x, ivett) -> Enthral(x, neal))\nforall x (Crazed(x) and Enthral(x, neal) -> Enthral(x, ivett))\nforall x (Wander(x, neal) and Blacklist(neal, ivett) -> Wander(ivett, neal))\nforall x (Windburned(x) and Twee(x) -> Wander(x, ivett))\nWander(ivett, neal) and Deflective(ivett) -> Blacklist(neal, ivett)\nforall x (Enthral(x, neal) -> Crazed(x))\n\nCrazed(ivett)\n\nEnthral(ivett, neal) and forall x (Enthral(x, neal) -> Crazed(x)) -> therefore Crazed(ivett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The dino dowse the aube. The dino is bellied. The dino is jointed. The dino is slapdash. The dino recollect the aube. The dino pump the aube. The aube dowse the dino. The aube is bellied. The aube is postictal. The aube is slapdash. The aube recollect the dino. The aube pump the dino. If something is jointed and it pump the dino then the dino pump the aube. If the dino recollect the aube and the aube is jointed then the dino is slapdash. If something recollect the aube and it dowse the dino then it pump the aube. If something is postictal and it pump the aube then it pump the dino. If something recollect the aube and the aube dowse the dino then the dino recollect the aube. If something is jointed and slapdash then it recollect the dino. If the dino recollect the aube and the dino is bellied then the aube dowse the dino. If something pump the aube then it is postictal. The dino does not like the dino.", "logic": "\nDowse(dino, aube)\nBellied(dino)\nJointed(dino)\nSlapdash(dino)\nRecollect(dino, aube)\nPump(dino, aube)\nDowse(aube, dino)\nBellied(aube)\nPostictal(aube)\nSlapdash(aube)\nRecollect(aube, dino)\nPump(aube, dino)\nforall x (Jointed(x) and Pump(x, dino) -> Pump(dino, aube))\nRecollect(dino, aube) and Jointed(aube) -> Slapdash(dino)\nforall x (Recollect(x, aube) and Dowse(x, dino) -> Pump(x, aube))\nforall x (Postictal(x) and Pump(x, aube) -> Pump(x, dino))\nforall x (Recollect(x, aube) and Dowse(aube, dino) -> Recollect(dino, aube))\nforall x (Jointed(x) and Slapdash(x) -> Recollect(x, dino))\nRecollect(dino, aube) and Bellied(dino) -> Dowse(aube, dino)\nforall x (Pump(x, aube) -> Postictal(x))\n\nnot Recollect(dino, dino)\n\nJointed(dino) and Slapdash(dino) and forall x (Jointed(x) and Slapdash(x) -> Recollect(x, dino)) -> therefore Recollect(dino, dino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The berte forego the randolf. The berte is fond. The berte is liable. The berte is corporal. The berte anoint the randolf. The berte belittle the randolf. The randolf forego the berte. The randolf is fond. The randolf is filmable. The randolf is corporal. The randolf anoint the berte. The randolf belittle the berte. If something is liable and it belittle the berte then the berte belittle the randolf. If the berte anoint the randolf and the randolf is liable then the berte is corporal. If something anoint the randolf and it forego the berte then it belittle the randolf. If something is filmable and it belittle the randolf then it belittle the berte. If something anoint the randolf and the randolf forego the berte then the berte anoint the randolf. If something is liable and corporal then it anoint the berte. If the berte anoint the randolf and the berte is fond then the randolf forego the berte. If something belittle the randolf then it is filmable. The berte belittle the berte.", "logic": "\nForego(berte, randolf)\nFond(berte)\nLiable(berte)\nCorporal(berte)\nAnoint(berte, randolf)\nBelittle(berte, randolf)\nForego(randolf, berte)\nFond(randolf)\nFilmable(randolf)\nCorporal(randolf)\nAnoint(randolf, berte)\nBelittle(randolf, berte)\nforall x (Liable(x) and Belittle(x, berte) -> Belittle(berte, randolf))\nAnoint(berte, randolf) and Liable(randolf) -> Corporal(berte)\nforall x (Anoint(x, randolf) and Forego(x, berte) -> Belittle(x, randolf))\nforall x (Filmable(x) and Belittle(x, randolf) -> Belittle(x, berte))\nforall x (Anoint(x, randolf) and Forego(randolf, berte) -> Anoint(berte, randolf))\nforall x (Liable(x) and Corporal(x) -> Anoint(x, berte))\nAnoint(berte, randolf) and Fond(berte) -> Forego(randolf, berte)\nforall x (Belittle(x, randolf) -> Filmable(x))\n\nBelittle(berte, berte)\n\nBelittle(berte, randolf) and forall x (Belittle(x, randolf) -> Filmable(x)) -> therefore Filmable(berte) Filmable(berte) and Belittle(berte, randolf) and forall x (Filmable(x) and Belittle(x, randolf) -> Belittle(x, berte)) -> therefore Belittle(berte, berte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The karen eulogise the lionel. The karen is peculiar. The karen is dreamed. The karen is notched. The karen receive the lionel. The karen hark the lionel. The lionel eulogise the karen. The lionel is peculiar. The lionel is kayoed. The lionel is notched. The lionel receive the karen. The lionel hark the karen. If something is dreamed and it hark the karen then the karen hark the lionel. If the karen receive the lionel and the lionel is dreamed then the karen is notched. If something receive the lionel and it eulogise the karen then it hark the lionel. If something is kayoed and it hark the lionel then it hark the karen. If something receive the lionel and the lionel eulogise the karen then the karen receive the lionel. If something is dreamed and notched then it receive the karen. If the karen receive the lionel and the karen is peculiar then the lionel eulogise the karen. If something hark the lionel then it is kayoed. The karen does not visit the karen.", "logic": "\nEulogise(karen, lionel)\nPeculiar(karen)\nDreamed(karen)\nNotched(karen)\nReceive(karen, lionel)\nHark(karen, lionel)\nEulogise(lionel, karen)\nPeculiar(lionel)\nKayoed(lionel)\nNotched(lionel)\nReceive(lionel, karen)\nHark(lionel, karen)\nforall x (Dreamed(x) and Hark(x, karen) -> Hark(karen, lionel))\nReceive(karen, lionel) and Dreamed(lionel) -> Notched(karen)\nforall x (Receive(x, lionel) and Eulogise(x, karen) -> Hark(x, lionel))\nforall x (Kayoed(x) and Hark(x, lionel) -> Hark(x, karen))\nforall x (Receive(x, lionel) and Eulogise(lionel, karen) -> Receive(karen, lionel))\nforall x (Dreamed(x) and Notched(x) -> Receive(x, karen))\nReceive(karen, lionel) and Peculiar(karen) -> Eulogise(lionel, karen)\nforall x (Hark(x, lionel) -> Kayoed(x))\n\nnot Hark(karen, karen)\n\nHark(karen, lionel) and forall x (Hark(x, lionel) -> Kayoed(x)) -> therefore Kayoed(karen) Kayoed(karen) and Hark(karen, lionel) and forall x (Kayoed(x) and Hark(x, lionel) -> Hark(x, karen)) -> therefore Hark(karen, karen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The cordie misguide the augustin. The cordie is trabecular. The cordie is overladen. The cordie is omnivorous. The cordie propose the augustin. The cordie horn the augustin. The augustin misguide the cordie. The augustin is trabecular. The augustin is nurtural. The augustin is omnivorous. The augustin propose the cordie. The augustin horn the cordie. If something is overladen and it horn the cordie then the cordie horn the augustin. If the cordie propose the augustin and the augustin is overladen then the cordie is omnivorous. If something propose the augustin and it misguide the cordie then it horn the augustin. If something is nurtural and it horn the augustin then it horn the cordie. If something propose the augustin and the augustin misguide the cordie then the cordie propose the augustin. If something is overladen and omnivorous then it propose the cordie. If the cordie propose the augustin and the cordie is trabecular then the augustin misguide the cordie. If something horn the augustin then it is nurtural. The augustin does not visit the augustin.", "logic": "\nMisguide(cordie, augustin)\nTrabecular(cordie)\nOverladen(cordie)\nOmnivorous(cordie)\nPropose(cordie, augustin)\nHorn(cordie, augustin)\nMisguide(augustin, cordie)\nTrabecular(augustin)\nNurtural(augustin)\nOmnivorous(augustin)\nPropose(augustin, cordie)\nHorn(augustin, cordie)\nforall x (Overladen(x) and Horn(x, cordie) -> Horn(cordie, augustin))\nPropose(cordie, augustin) and Overladen(augustin) -> Omnivorous(cordie)\nforall x (Propose(x, augustin) and Misguide(x, cordie) -> Horn(x, augustin))\nforall x (Nurtural(x) and Horn(x, augustin) -> Horn(x, cordie))\nforall x (Propose(x, augustin) and Misguide(augustin, cordie) -> Propose(cordie, augustin))\nforall x (Overladen(x) and Omnivorous(x) -> Propose(x, cordie))\nPropose(cordie, augustin) and Trabecular(cordie) -> Misguide(augustin, cordie)\nforall x (Horn(x, augustin) -> Nurtural(x))\n\nnot Horn(augustin, augustin)\n\nforall x (Propose(x, augustin) and Misguide(x, cordie) -> Horn(x, augustin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The adey unitize the sly. The adey is renunciant. The adey is omissive. The adey is pyrrhic. The adey batten the sly. The adey cerebrate the sly. The sly unitize the adey. The sly is renunciant. The sly is perforated. The sly is pyrrhic. The sly batten the adey. The sly cerebrate the adey. If something is omissive and it cerebrate the adey then the adey cerebrate the sly. If the adey batten the sly and the sly is omissive then the adey is pyrrhic. If something batten the sly and it unitize the adey then it cerebrate the sly. If something is perforated and it cerebrate the sly then it cerebrate the adey. If something batten the sly and the sly unitize the adey then the adey batten the sly. If something is omissive and pyrrhic then it batten the adey. If the adey batten the sly and the adey is renunciant then the sly unitize the adey. If something cerebrate the sly then it is perforated. The sly is young.", "logic": "\nUnitize(adey, sly)\nRenunciant(adey)\nOmissive(adey)\nPyrrhic(adey)\nBatten(adey, sly)\nCerebrate(adey, sly)\nUnitize(sly, adey)\nRenunciant(sly)\nPerforated(sly)\nPyrrhic(sly)\nBatten(sly, adey)\nCerebrate(sly, adey)\nforall x (Omissive(x) and Cerebrate(x, adey) -> Cerebrate(adey, sly))\nBatten(adey, sly) and Omissive(sly) -> Pyrrhic(adey)\nforall x (Batten(x, sly) and Unitize(x, adey) -> Cerebrate(x, sly))\nforall x (Perforated(x) and Cerebrate(x, sly) -> Cerebrate(x, adey))\nforall x (Batten(x, sly) and Unitize(sly, adey) -> Batten(adey, sly))\nforall x (Omissive(x) and Pyrrhic(x) -> Batten(x, adey))\nBatten(adey, sly) and Renunciant(adey) -> Unitize(sly, adey)\nforall x (Cerebrate(x, sly) -> Perforated(x))\n\nYoung(sly)\n\nYoung(sly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The maryann glamour the hassan. The maryann is radiating. The maryann is unsounded. The maryann is tempering. The maryann double the hassan. The maryann wreathe the hassan. The hassan glamour the maryann. The hassan is radiating. The hassan is fusty. The hassan is tempering. The hassan double the maryann. The hassan wreathe the maryann. If something is unsounded and it wreathe the maryann then the maryann wreathe the hassan. If the maryann double the hassan and the hassan is unsounded then the maryann is tempering. If something double the hassan and it glamour the maryann then it wreathe the hassan. If something is fusty and it wreathe the hassan then it wreathe the maryann. If something double the hassan and the hassan glamour the maryann then the maryann double the hassan. If something is unsounded and tempering then it double the maryann. If the maryann double the hassan and the maryann is radiating then the hassan glamour the maryann. If something wreathe the hassan then it is fusty. The maryann is not young.", "logic": "\nGlamour(maryann, hassan)\nRadiating(maryann)\nUnsounded(maryann)\nTempering(maryann)\nDouble(maryann, hassan)\nWreathe(maryann, hassan)\nGlamour(hassan, maryann)\nRadiating(hassan)\nFusty(hassan)\nTempering(hassan)\nDouble(hassan, maryann)\nWreathe(hassan, maryann)\nforall x (Unsounded(x) and Wreathe(x, maryann) -> Wreathe(maryann, hassan))\nDouble(maryann, hassan) and Unsounded(hassan) -> Tempering(maryann)\nforall x (Double(x, hassan) and Glamour(x, maryann) -> Wreathe(x, hassan))\nforall x (Fusty(x) and Wreathe(x, hassan) -> Wreathe(x, maryann))\nforall x (Double(x, hassan) and Glamour(hassan, maryann) -> Double(maryann, hassan))\nforall x (Unsounded(x) and Tempering(x) -> Double(x, maryann))\nDouble(maryann, hassan) and Radiating(maryann) -> Glamour(hassan, maryann)\nforall x (Wreathe(x, hassan) -> Fusty(x))\n\nnot Young(maryann)\n\nnot Young(maryann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The josy flyfish the vinod. The josy is slovenian. The josy is cyanophyte. The josy is gabled. The josy crossbreed the vinod. The josy press the vinod. The vinod flyfish the josy. The vinod is slovenian. The vinod is syllabled. The vinod is gabled. The vinod crossbreed the josy. The vinod press the josy. If something is cyanophyte and it press the josy then the josy press the vinod. If the josy crossbreed the vinod and the vinod is cyanophyte then the josy is gabled. If something crossbreed the vinod and it flyfish the josy then it press the vinod. If something is syllabled and it press the vinod then it press the josy. If something crossbreed the vinod and the vinod flyfish the josy then the josy crossbreed the vinod. If something is cyanophyte and gabled then it crossbreed the josy. If the josy crossbreed the vinod and the josy is slovenian then the vinod flyfish the josy. If something press the vinod then it is syllabled. The josy flyfish the josy.", "logic": "\nFlyfish(josy, vinod)\nSlovenian(josy)\nCyanophyte(josy)\nGabled(josy)\nCrossbreed(josy, vinod)\nPress(josy, vinod)\nFlyfish(vinod, josy)\nSlovenian(vinod)\nSyllabled(vinod)\nGabled(vinod)\nCrossbreed(vinod, josy)\nPress(vinod, josy)\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) and Press(x, josy) -> Press(josy, vinod))\nCrossbreed(josy, vinod) and Cyanophyte(vinod) -> Gabled(josy)\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, vinod) and Flyfish(x, josy) -> Press(x, vinod))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) and Press(x, vinod) -> Press(x, josy))\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, vinod) and Flyfish(vinod, josy) -> Crossbreed(josy, vinod))\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) and Gabled(x) -> Crossbreed(x, josy))\nCrossbreed(josy, vinod) and Slovenian(josy) -> Flyfish(vinod, josy)\nforall x (Press(x, vinod) -> Syllabled(x))\n\nFlyfish(josy, josy)\n\nFlyfish(josy, josy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The ekaterina memorize the vergil. The ekaterina is syncopated. The ekaterina is sedative. The ekaterina is priestlike. The ekaterina borrow the vergil. The ekaterina reelect the vergil. The vergil memorize the ekaterina. The vergil is syncopated. The vergil is spurned. The vergil is priestlike. The vergil borrow the ekaterina. The vergil reelect the ekaterina. If something is sedative and it reelect the ekaterina then the ekaterina reelect the vergil. If the ekaterina borrow the vergil and the vergil is sedative then the ekaterina is priestlike. If something borrow the vergil and it memorize the ekaterina then it reelect the vergil. If something is spurned and it reelect the vergil then it reelect the ekaterina. If something borrow the vergil and the vergil memorize the ekaterina then the ekaterina borrow the vergil. If something is sedative and priestlike then it borrow the ekaterina. If the ekaterina borrow the vergil and the ekaterina is syncopated then the vergil memorize the ekaterina. If something reelect the vergil then it is spurned. The vergil does not eat the vergil.", "logic": "\nMemorize(ekaterina, vergil)\nSyncopated(ekaterina)\nSedative(ekaterina)\nPriestlike(ekaterina)\nBorrow(ekaterina, vergil)\nReelect(ekaterina, vergil)\nMemorize(vergil, ekaterina)\nSyncopated(vergil)\nSpurned(vergil)\nPriestlike(vergil)\nBorrow(vergil, ekaterina)\nReelect(vergil, ekaterina)\nforall x (Sedative(x) and Reelect(x, ekaterina) -> Reelect(ekaterina, vergil))\nBorrow(ekaterina, vergil) and Sedative(vergil) -> Priestlike(ekaterina)\nforall x (Borrow(x, vergil) and Memorize(x, ekaterina) -> Reelect(x, vergil))\nforall x (Spurned(x) and Reelect(x, vergil) -> Reelect(x, ekaterina))\nforall x (Borrow(x, vergil) and Memorize(vergil, ekaterina) -> Borrow(ekaterina, vergil))\nforall x (Sedative(x) and Priestlike(x) -> Borrow(x, ekaterina))\nBorrow(ekaterina, vergil) and Syncopated(ekaterina) -> Memorize(vergil, ekaterina)\nforall x (Reelect(x, vergil) -> Spurned(x))\n\nnot Memorize(vergil, vergil)\n\nnot Memorize(vergil, vergil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "The alston sort the pierre. The alston is smokeless. The alston is canonic. The alston is headstrong. The alston preview the pierre. The alston plate the pierre. The pierre sort the alston. The pierre is smokeless. The pierre is purifying. The pierre is headstrong. The pierre preview the alston. The pierre plate the alston. If something is canonic and it plate the alston then the alston plate the pierre. If the alston preview the pierre and the pierre is canonic then the alston is headstrong. If something preview the pierre and it sort the alston then it plate the pierre. If something is purifying and it plate the pierre then it plate the alston. If something preview the pierre and the pierre sort the alston then the alston preview the pierre. If something is canonic and headstrong then it preview the alston. If the alston preview the pierre and the alston is smokeless then the pierre sort the alston. If something plate the pierre then it is purifying. The pierre preview the pierre.", "logic": "\nSort(alston, pierre)\nSmokeless(alston)\nCanonic(alston)\nHeadstrong(alston)\nPreview(alston, pierre)\nPlate(alston, pierre)\nSort(pierre, alston)\nSmokeless(pierre)\nPurifying(pierre)\nHeadstrong(pierre)\nPreview(pierre, alston)\nPlate(pierre, alston)\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Plate(x, alston) -> Plate(alston, pierre))\nPreview(alston, pierre) and Canonic(pierre) -> Headstrong(alston)\nforall x (Preview(x, pierre) and Sort(x, alston) -> Plate(x, pierre))\nforall x (Purifying(x) and Plate(x, pierre) -> Plate(x, alston))\nforall x (Preview(x, pierre) and Sort(pierre, alston) -> Preview(alston, pierre))\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Headstrong(x) -> Preview(x, alston))\nPreview(alston, pierre) and Smokeless(alston) -> Sort(pierre, alston)\nforall x (Plate(x, pierre) -> Purifying(x))\n\nPreview(pierre, pierre)\n\nPreview(pierre, pierre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1650"} {"premises": "Kalle is ordained. If something is ordained then it is monogynic. All evil, agleam things are monogynic. If something is evil and monogynic then it is smoothbore. If something is monogynic then it is smoothbore. If something is nullified and agleam then it is abreast. If Kalle is monogynic and Kalle is nullified then Kalle is evil. Kalle is ordained.", "logic": "\nOrdained(kalle)\nforall x (Ordained(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nforall x (Evil(x) and Agleam(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nforall x (Evil(x) and Monogynic(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Nullified(x) and Agleam(x) -> Abreast(x))\nMonogynic(kalle) and Nullified(kalle) -> Evil(kalle)\n\nOrdained(kalle)\n\ntherefore Ordained(kalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Estrella is unclogged. If something is unclogged then it is fulgid. All hebdomadal, tangerine things are fulgid. If something is hebdomadal and fulgid then it is western. If something is fulgid then it is western. If something is twinkly and tangerine then it is pursy. If Estrella is fulgid and Estrella is twinkly then Estrella is hebdomadal. Estrella is not unclogged.", "logic": "\nUnclogged(estrella)\nforall x (Unclogged(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Tangerine(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Fulgid(x) -> Western(x))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) -> Western(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) and Tangerine(x) -> Pursy(x))\nFulgid(estrella) and Twinkly(estrella) -> Hebdomadal(estrella)\n\nnot Unclogged(estrella)\n\ntherefore Unclogged(estrella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Patience is trifling. If something is trifling then it is diploid. All privileged, croupy things are diploid. If something is privileged and diploid then it is wilted. If something is diploid then it is wilted. If something is romani and croupy then it is weedless. If Patience is diploid and Patience is romani then Patience is privileged. Patience is diploid.", "logic": "\nTrifling(patience)\nforall x (Trifling(x) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Privileged(x) and Croupy(x) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Privileged(x) and Diploid(x) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Diploid(x) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Romani(x) and Croupy(x) -> Weedless(x))\nDiploid(patience) and Romani(patience) -> Privileged(patience)\n\nDiploid(patience)\n\nTrifling(patience) and forall x (Trifling(x) -> Diploid(x)) -> therefore Diploid(patience)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Shirleen is azygos. If something is azygos then it is unimodal. All agile, relaxed things are unimodal. If something is agile and unimodal then it is unprepared. If something is unimodal then it is unprepared. If something is lxxxii and relaxed then it is savourless. If Shirleen is unimodal and Shirleen is lxxxii then Shirleen is agile. Shirleen is not unimodal.", "logic": "\nAzygos(shirleen)\nforall x (Azygos(x) -> Unimodal(x))\nforall x (Agile(x) and Relaxed(x) -> Unimodal(x))\nforall x (Agile(x) and Unimodal(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Unimodal(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Lxxxii(x) and Relaxed(x) -> Savourless(x))\nUnimodal(shirleen) and Lxxxii(shirleen) -> Agile(shirleen)\n\nnot Unimodal(shirleen)\n\nAzygos(shirleen) and forall x (Azygos(x) -> Unimodal(x)) -> therefore Unimodal(shirleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Parke is swordlike. If something is swordlike then it is lotic. All allopathic, formulary things are lotic. If something is allopathic and lotic then it is rowdy. If something is lotic then it is rowdy. If something is deist and formulary then it is patellar. If Parke is lotic and Parke is deist then Parke is allopathic. Parke is rowdy.", "logic": "\nSwordlike(parke)\nforall x (Swordlike(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Formulary(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Lotic(x) -> Rowdy(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) -> Rowdy(x))\nforall x (Deist(x) and Formulary(x) -> Patellar(x))\nLotic(parke) and Deist(parke) -> Allopathic(parke)\n\nRowdy(parke)\n\nSwordlike(parke) and forall x (Swordlike(x) -> Lotic(x)) -> therefore Lotic(parke) Lotic(parke) and forall x (Lotic(x) -> Rowdy(x)) -> therefore Rowdy(parke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Olivier is wondrous. If something is wondrous then it is strung. All anaphasic, unexpended things are strung. If something is anaphasic and strung then it is unsound. If something is strung then it is unsound. If something is metal and unexpended then it is thalassic. If Olivier is strung and Olivier is metal then Olivier is anaphasic. Olivier is not unsound.", "logic": "\nWondrous(olivier)\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Strung(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Unexpended(x) -> Strung(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Strung(x) -> Unsound(x))\nforall x (Strung(x) -> Unsound(x))\nforall x (Metal(x) and Unexpended(x) -> Thalassic(x))\nStrung(olivier) and Metal(olivier) -> Anaphasic(olivier)\n\nnot Unsound(olivier)\n\nWondrous(olivier) and forall x (Wondrous(x) -> Strung(x)) -> therefore Strung(olivier) Strung(olivier) and forall x (Strung(x) -> Unsound(x)) -> therefore Unsound(olivier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Lorianna is niggardly. If something is niggardly then it is obstructed. All xxxv, bindable things are obstructed. If something is xxxv and obstructed then it is extricable. If something is obstructed then it is extricable. If something is ecologic and bindable then it is ivied. If Lorianna is obstructed and Lorianna is ecologic then Lorianna is xxxv. Lorianna is not xxxv.", "logic": "\nNiggardly(lorianna)\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Obstructed(x))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) and Bindable(x) -> Obstructed(x))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) and Obstructed(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Ecologic(x) and Bindable(x) -> Ivied(x))\nObstructed(lorianna) and Ecologic(lorianna) -> Xxxv(lorianna)\n\nnot Xxxv(lorianna)\n\nObstructed(lorianna) and Ecologic(lorianna) -> Xxxv(lorianna) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Sula is squandered. If something is squandered then it is duncish. All besprent, pseudo things are duncish. If something is besprent and duncish then it is colorectal. If something is duncish then it is colorectal. If something is clawlike and pseudo then it is paraplegic. If Sula is duncish and Sula is clawlike then Sula is besprent. Sula is paraplegic.", "logic": "\nSquandered(sula)\nforall x (Squandered(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Besprent(x) and Pseudo(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Besprent(x) and Duncish(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and Pseudo(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nDuncish(sula) and Clawlike(sula) -> Besprent(sula)\n\nParaplegic(sula)\n\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and Pseudo(x) -> Paraplegic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Adolphus is exiguous. If something is exiguous then it is petulant. All scalloped, prisonlike things are petulant. If something is scalloped and petulant then it is altruistic. If something is petulant then it is altruistic. If something is natal and prisonlike then it is semiopaque. If Adolphus is petulant and Adolphus is natal then Adolphus is scalloped. Adolphus is not prisonlike.", "logic": "\nExiguous(adolphus)\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Petulant(x))\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Prisonlike(x) -> Petulant(x))\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Petulant(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Natal(x) and Prisonlike(x) -> Semiopaque(x))\nPetulant(adolphus) and Natal(adolphus) -> Scalloped(adolphus)\n\nnot Prisonlike(adolphus)\n\nnot Prisonlike(adolphus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "Ambros is footloose. If something is footloose then it is vincible. All outer, formless things are vincible. If something is outer and vincible then it is unmannered. If something is vincible then it is unmannered. If something is unavenged and formless then it is transpolar. If Ambros is vincible and Ambros is unavenged then Ambros is outer. Ambros is unavenged.", "logic": "\nFootloose(ambros)\nforall x (Footloose(x) -> Vincible(x))\nforall x (Outer(x) and Formless(x) -> Vincible(x))\nforall x (Outer(x) and Vincible(x) -> Unmannered(x))\nforall x (Vincible(x) -> Unmannered(x))\nforall x (Unavenged(x) and Formless(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nVincible(ambros) and Unavenged(ambros) -> Outer(ambros)\n\nUnavenged(ambros)\n\nUnavenged(ambros) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1470"} {"premises": "The evelyn is fixed. If the evelyn is premarital then the evelyn is condemning. Red people are premarital. Round people are meet. The evelyn is fixed.", "logic": "\nFixed(evelyn)\nPremarital(evelyn) -> Condemning(evelyn)\nforall x (Fixed(x) -> Premarital(x))\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> Meet(x))\n\nFixed(evelyn)\n\ntherefore Fixed(evelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The modestine is gammy. If the modestine is dated then the modestine is curricular. Red people are dated. Round people are sectioned. The modestine is not gammy.", "logic": "\nGammy(modestine)\nDated(modestine) -> Curricular(modestine)\nforall x (Gammy(x) -> Dated(x))\nforall x (Dated(x) -> Sectioned(x))\n\nnot Gammy(modestine)\n\ntherefore Gammy(modestine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The agnola is toadyish. If the agnola is chummy then the agnola is pinnatifid. Red people are chummy. Round people are climatic. The agnola is chummy.", "logic": "\nToadyish(agnola)\nChummy(agnola) -> Pinnatifid(agnola)\nforall x (Toadyish(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Climatic(x))\n\nChummy(agnola)\n\nToadyish(agnola) and forall x (Toadyish(x) -> Chummy(x)) -> therefore Chummy(agnola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The rosalind is interior. If the rosalind is alleged then the rosalind is shoeless. Red people are alleged. Round people are preceding. The rosalind is not alleged.", "logic": "\nInterior(rosalind)\nAlleged(rosalind) -> Shoeless(rosalind)\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Alleged(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Preceding(x))\n\nnot Alleged(rosalind)\n\nInterior(rosalind) and forall x (Interior(x) -> Alleged(x)) -> therefore Alleged(rosalind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The dela is blameless. If the dela is oviform then the dela is buddhist. Red people are oviform. Round people are eastward. The dela is eastward.", "logic": "\nBlameless(dela)\nOviform(dela) -> Buddhist(dela)\nforall x (Blameless(x) -> Oviform(x))\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Eastward(x))\n\nEastward(dela)\n\nBlameless(dela) and forall x (Blameless(x) -> Oviform(x)) -> therefore Oviform(dela) Oviform(dela) and forall x (Oviform(x) -> Eastward(x)) -> therefore Eastward(dela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The mendie is lengthwise. If the mendie is bifurcated then the mendie is cheerful. Red people are bifurcated. Round people are mechanized. The mendie is not mechanized.", "logic": "\nLengthwise(mendie)\nBifurcated(mendie) -> Cheerful(mendie)\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) -> Bifurcated(x))\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Mechanized(x))\n\nnot Mechanized(mendie)\n\nLengthwise(mendie) and forall x (Lengthwise(x) -> Bifurcated(x)) -> therefore Bifurcated(mendie) Bifurcated(mendie) and forall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Mechanized(x)) -> therefore Mechanized(mendie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The averil is actuated. If the averil is sagacious then the averil is penial. Red people are sagacious. Round people are curious. The averil is not cold.", "logic": "\nActuated(averil)\nSagacious(averil) -> Penial(averil)\nforall x (Actuated(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nforall x (Sagacious(x) -> Curious(x))\n\nnot Cold(averil)\n\nnot Cold(averil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The clo is hoggish. If the clo is healing then the clo is autoerotic. Red people are healing. Round people are notched. The clo visits the clo.", "logic": "\nHoggish(clo)\nHealing(clo) -> Autoerotic(clo)\nforall x (Hoggish(x) -> Healing(x))\nforall x (Healing(x) -> Notched(x))\n\nVisits(clo, clo)\n\nVisits(clo, clo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The farah is violable. If the farah is reptilian then the farah is sorbed. Red people are reptilian. Round people are russian. The farah does not see the farah.", "logic": "\nViolable(farah)\nReptilian(farah) -> Sorbed(farah)\nforall x (Violable(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Reptilian(x) -> Russian(x))\n\nnot Sees(farah, farah)\n\nnot Sees(farah, farah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The yankee is amerind. If the yankee is urogenital then the yankee is temporary. Red people are urogenital. Round people are seljuk. The yankee likes the yankee.", "logic": "\nAmerind(yankee)\nUrogenital(yankee) -> Temporary(yankee)\nforall x (Amerind(x) -> Urogenital(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Seljuk(x))\n\nLikes(yankee, yankee)\n\nLikes(yankee, yankee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The aretha transfer the betty. The aretha does not eat the betty. The aretha is effected. The aretha depute the betty. The betty transfer the aretha. The betty does not eat the aretha. The betty is effected. If something depute the aretha then it does not eat the betty. If the aretha is heavy and the aretha is expiative then the aretha depute the betty. If something is effected then it depute the aretha. The aretha transfer the betty.", "logic": "\nTransfer(aretha, betty)\nnot Delete(aretha, betty)\nEffected(aretha)\nDepute(aretha, betty)\nTransfer(betty, aretha)\nnot Delete(betty, aretha)\nEffected(betty)\nforall x (Depute(x, aretha) -> not Delete(x, betty))\nHeavy(aretha) and Expiative(aretha) -> Depute(aretha, betty)\nforall x (Effected(x) -> Depute(x, aretha))\n\nTransfer(aretha, betty)\n\ntherefore Transfer(aretha, betty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The reggie retire the franky. The reggie does not eat the franky. The reggie is boughless. The reggie reminisce the franky. The franky retire the reggie. The franky does not eat the reggie. The franky is boughless. If something reminisce the reggie then it does not eat the franky. If the reggie is shot and the reggie is bituminoid then the reggie reminisce the franky. If something is boughless then it reminisce the reggie. The franky is not boughless.", "logic": "\nRetire(reggie, franky)\nnot Overstep(reggie, franky)\nBoughless(reggie)\nReminisce(reggie, franky)\nRetire(franky, reggie)\nnot Overstep(franky, reggie)\nBoughless(franky)\nforall x (Reminisce(x, reggie) -> not Overstep(x, franky))\nShot(reggie) and Bituminoid(reggie) -> Reminisce(reggie, franky)\nforall x (Boughless(x) -> Reminisce(x, reggie))\n\nnot Boughless(franky)\n\ntherefore Boughless(franky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The anissa caponize the nani. The anissa does not eat the nani. The anissa is amorous. The anissa bisect the nani. The nani caponize the anissa. The nani does not eat the anissa. The nani is amorous. If something bisect the anissa then it does not eat the nani. If the anissa is delinquent and the anissa is clement then the anissa bisect the nani. If something is amorous then it bisect the anissa. The anissa bisect the anissa.", "logic": "\nCaponize(anissa, nani)\nnot Grade(anissa, nani)\nAmorous(anissa)\nBisect(anissa, nani)\nCaponize(nani, anissa)\nnot Grade(nani, anissa)\nAmorous(nani)\nforall x (Bisect(x, anissa) -> not Grade(x, nani))\nDelinquent(anissa) and Clement(anissa) -> Bisect(anissa, nani)\nforall x (Amorous(x) -> Bisect(x, anissa))\n\nBisect(anissa, anissa)\n\nAmorous(anissa) and forall x (Amorous(x) -> Bisect(x, anissa)) -> therefore Bisect(anissa, anissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The gilberta undertake the klarrisa. The gilberta does not eat the klarrisa. The gilberta is licked. The gilberta ship the klarrisa. The klarrisa undertake the gilberta. The klarrisa does not eat the gilberta. The klarrisa is licked. If something ship the gilberta then it does not eat the klarrisa. If the gilberta is choice and the gilberta is unbloody then the gilberta ship the klarrisa. If something is licked then it ship the gilberta. The gilberta does not see the gilberta.", "logic": "\nUndertake(gilberta, klarrisa)\nnot Career(gilberta, klarrisa)\nLicked(gilberta)\nShip(gilberta, klarrisa)\nUndertake(klarrisa, gilberta)\nnot Career(klarrisa, gilberta)\nLicked(klarrisa)\nforall x (Ship(x, gilberta) -> not Career(x, klarrisa))\nChoice(gilberta) and Unbloody(gilberta) -> Ship(gilberta, klarrisa)\nforall x (Licked(x) -> Ship(x, gilberta))\n\nnot Ship(gilberta, gilberta)\n\nLicked(gilberta) and forall x (Licked(x) -> Ship(x, gilberta)) -> therefore Ship(gilberta, gilberta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The halie shovel the ania. The halie does not eat the ania. The halie is brusk. The halie treat the ania. The ania shovel the halie. The ania does not eat the halie. The ania is brusk. If something treat the halie then it does not eat the ania. If the halie is untroubled and the halie is hornless then the halie treat the ania. If something is brusk then it treat the halie. The ania does not eat the ania.", "logic": "\nShovel(halie, ania)\nnot Christen(halie, ania)\nBrusk(halie)\nTreat(halie, ania)\nShovel(ania, halie)\nnot Christen(ania, halie)\nBrusk(ania)\nforall x (Treat(x, halie) -> not Christen(x, ania))\nUntroubled(halie) and Hornless(halie) -> Treat(halie, ania)\nforall x (Brusk(x) -> Treat(x, halie))\n\nnot Christen(ania, ania)\n\nBrusk(ania) and forall x (Brusk(x) -> Treat(x, halie)) -> therefore Treat(ania, halie) Treat(ania, halie) and forall x (Treat(x, halie) -> not Christen(x, ania)) -> therefore not Christen(ania, ania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The enrica misconduct the bellina. The enrica does not eat the bellina. The enrica is lethargic. The enrica decolour the bellina. The bellina misconduct the enrica. The bellina does not eat the enrica. The bellina is lethargic. If something decolour the enrica then it does not eat the bellina. If the enrica is scathing and the enrica is awless then the enrica decolour the bellina. If something is lethargic then it decolour the enrica. The bellina pause the bellina.", "logic": "\nMisconduct(enrica, bellina)\nnot Pause(enrica, bellina)\nLethargic(enrica)\nDecolour(enrica, bellina)\nMisconduct(bellina, enrica)\nnot Pause(bellina, enrica)\nLethargic(bellina)\nforall x (Decolour(x, enrica) -> not Pause(x, bellina))\nScathing(enrica) and Awless(enrica) -> Decolour(enrica, bellina)\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Decolour(x, enrica))\n\nPause(bellina, bellina)\n\nLethargic(bellina) and forall x (Lethargic(x) -> Decolour(x, enrica)) -> therefore Decolour(bellina, enrica) Decolour(bellina, enrica) and forall x (Decolour(x, enrica) -> not Pause(x, bellina)) -> therefore not Pause(bellina, bellina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The berget regret the perceval. The berget does not eat the perceval. The berget is goalless. The berget sate the perceval. The perceval regret the berget. The perceval does not eat the berget. The perceval is goalless. If something sate the berget then it does not eat the perceval. If the berget is separable and the berget is exsanguine then the berget sate the perceval. If something is goalless then it sate the berget. The berget is not separable.", "logic": "\nRegret(berget, perceval)\nnot Ruck(berget, perceval)\nGoalless(berget)\nSate(berget, perceval)\nRegret(perceval, berget)\nnot Ruck(perceval, berget)\nGoalless(perceval)\nforall x (Sate(x, berget) -> not Ruck(x, perceval))\nSeparable(berget) and Exsanguine(berget) -> Sate(berget, perceval)\nforall x (Goalless(x) -> Sate(x, berget))\n\nnot Separable(berget)\n\nnot Separable(berget) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The jessika pelt the gray. The jessika does not eat the gray. The jessika is sore. The jessika aromatise the gray. The gray pelt the jessika. The gray does not eat the jessika. The gray is sore. If something aromatise the jessika then it does not eat the gray. If the jessika is ursine and the jessika is flowering then the jessika aromatise the gray. If something is sore then it aromatise the jessika. The gray pelt the gray.", "logic": "\nPelt(jessika, gray)\nnot Angle(jessika, gray)\nSore(jessika)\nAromatise(jessika, gray)\nPelt(gray, jessika)\nnot Angle(gray, jessika)\nSore(gray)\nforall x (Aromatise(x, jessika) -> not Angle(x, gray))\nUrsine(jessika) and Flowering(jessika) -> Aromatise(jessika, gray)\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Aromatise(x, jessika))\n\nPelt(gray, gray)\n\nPelt(gray, gray) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The gladys misspeak the rianon. The gladys does not eat the rianon. The gladys is photic. The gladys emphasise the rianon. The rianon misspeak the gladys. The rianon does not eat the gladys. The rianon is photic. If something emphasise the gladys then it does not eat the rianon. If the gladys is glooming and the gladys is chiseled then the gladys emphasise the rianon. If something is photic then it emphasise the gladys. The gladys is not kind.", "logic": "\nMisspeak(gladys, rianon)\nnot Bird(gladys, rianon)\nPhotic(gladys)\nEmphasise(gladys, rianon)\nMisspeak(rianon, gladys)\nnot Bird(rianon, gladys)\nPhotic(rianon)\nforall x (Emphasise(x, gladys) -> not Bird(x, rianon))\nGlooming(gladys) and Chiseled(gladys) -> Emphasise(gladys, rianon)\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Emphasise(x, gladys))\n\nnot Kind(gladys)\n\nnot Kind(gladys) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The lynna traipse the gloriane. The lynna does not eat the gloriane. The lynna is slippery. The lynna amuse the gloriane. The gloriane traipse the lynna. The gloriane does not eat the lynna. The gloriane is slippery. If something amuse the lynna then it does not eat the gloriane. If the lynna is frigorific and the lynna is lavish then the lynna amuse the gloriane. If something is slippery then it amuse the lynna. The gloriane is kind.", "logic": "\nTraipse(lynna, gloriane)\nnot Blast(lynna, gloriane)\nSlippery(lynna)\nAmuse(lynna, gloriane)\nTraipse(gloriane, lynna)\nnot Blast(gloriane, lynna)\nSlippery(gloriane)\nforall x (Amuse(x, lynna) -> not Blast(x, gloriane))\nFrigorific(lynna) and Lavish(lynna) -> Amuse(lynna, gloriane)\nforall x (Slippery(x) -> Amuse(x, lynna))\n\nKind(gloriane)\n\nKind(gloriane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The joelly colonise the arly. The joelly does not eat the arly. The joelly is sissyish. The joelly pile the arly. The arly colonise the joelly. The arly does not eat the joelly. The arly is sissyish. If something pile the joelly then it does not eat the arly. If the joelly is tasseled and the joelly is grouchy then the joelly pile the arly. If something is sissyish then it pile the joelly. The joelly is not nice.", "logic": "\nColonise(joelly, arly)\nnot Enrobe(joelly, arly)\nSissyish(joelly)\nPile(joelly, arly)\nColonise(arly, joelly)\nnot Enrobe(arly, joelly)\nSissyish(arly)\nforall x (Pile(x, joelly) -> not Enrobe(x, arly))\nTasseled(joelly) and Grouchy(joelly) -> Pile(joelly, arly)\nforall x (Sissyish(x) -> Pile(x, joelly))\n\nnot Nice(joelly)\n\nnot Nice(joelly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The edwin revalue the ilene. The edwin does not eat the ilene. The edwin is bewitching. The edwin cornice the ilene. The ilene revalue the edwin. The ilene does not eat the edwin. The ilene is bewitching. If something cornice the edwin then it does not eat the ilene. If the edwin is permed and the edwin is atilt then the edwin cornice the ilene. If something is bewitching then it cornice the edwin. The ilene cornice the ilene.", "logic": "\nRevalue(edwin, ilene)\nnot Gybe(edwin, ilene)\nBewitching(edwin)\nCornice(edwin, ilene)\nRevalue(ilene, edwin)\nnot Gybe(ilene, edwin)\nBewitching(ilene)\nforall x (Cornice(x, edwin) -> not Gybe(x, ilene))\nPermed(edwin) and Atilt(edwin) -> Cornice(edwin, ilene)\nforall x (Bewitching(x) -> Cornice(x, edwin))\n\nCornice(ilene, ilene)\n\nCornice(ilene, ilene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1053"} {"premises": "The tilly is apodous. The tilly swig the joscelin. The modestia is hindoo. The modestia is apodous. The modestia abduct the timmi. The modestia swig the tilly. The modestia unlace the timmi. The timmi unlace the tilly. The joscelin abduct the tilly. The joscelin swig the tilly. If someone swig the tilly and the tilly abduct the timmi then the timmi unlace the joscelin. If someone abduct the modestia and the modestia is lissome then they are apodous. If someone unlace the tilly then the tilly swig the timmi. If someone swig the tilly then they need the modestia. If someone swig the tilly and they see the tilly then they are worthwhile. If someone abduct the tilly and the tilly is hindoo then the tilly swig the modestia. If someone swig the timmi then the timmi is worthwhile. If someone is worthwhile and they need the joscelin then the joscelin abduct the modestia. The joscelin abduct the tilly.", "logic": "\nApodous(tilly)\nSwig(tilly, joscelin)\nHindoo(modestia)\nApodous(modestia)\nAbduct(modestia, timmi)\nSwig(modestia, tilly)\nUnlace(modestia, timmi)\nUnlace(timmi, tilly)\nAbduct(joscelin, tilly)\nSwig(joscelin, tilly)\nforall x (Swig(x, tilly) and Abduct(tilly, timmi) -> Unlace(timmi, joscelin))\nforall x (Abduct(x, modestia) and Lissome(modestia) -> Apodous(x))\nforall x (Unlace(x, tilly) -> Swig(tilly, timmi))\nforall x (Swig(x, tilly) -> Swig(x, modestia))\nforall x (Swig(x, tilly) and Unlace(x, tilly) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Abduct(x, tilly) and Hindoo(tilly) -> Swig(tilly, modestia))\nforall x (Swig(x, timmi) -> Worthwhile(timmi))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) and Swig(x, joscelin) -> Abduct(joscelin, modestia))\n\nAbduct(joscelin, tilly)\n\ntherefore Abduct(joscelin, tilly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The templeton is unknowing. The templeton gloss the enrique. The quinta is entitled. The quinta is unknowing. The quinta farce the carolann. The quinta gloss the templeton. The quinta jell the carolann. The carolann jell the templeton. The enrique farce the templeton. The enrique gloss the templeton. If someone gloss the templeton and the templeton farce the carolann then the carolann jell the enrique. If someone farce the quinta and the quinta is sterile then they are unknowing. If someone jell the templeton then the templeton gloss the carolann. If someone gloss the templeton then they need the quinta. If someone gloss the templeton and they see the templeton then they are clubbable. If someone farce the templeton and the templeton is entitled then the templeton gloss the quinta. If someone gloss the carolann then the carolann is clubbable. If someone is clubbable and they need the enrique then the enrique farce the quinta. The quinta does not see the carolann.", "logic": "\nUnknowing(templeton)\nGloss(templeton, enrique)\nEntitled(quinta)\nUnknowing(quinta)\nFarce(quinta, carolann)\nGloss(quinta, templeton)\nJell(quinta, carolann)\nJell(carolann, templeton)\nFarce(enrique, templeton)\nGloss(enrique, templeton)\nforall x (Gloss(x, templeton) and Farce(templeton, carolann) -> Jell(carolann, enrique))\nforall x (Farce(x, quinta) and Sterile(quinta) -> Unknowing(x))\nforall x (Jell(x, templeton) -> Gloss(templeton, carolann))\nforall x (Gloss(x, templeton) -> Gloss(x, quinta))\nforall x (Gloss(x, templeton) and Jell(x, templeton) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Farce(x, templeton) and Entitled(templeton) -> Gloss(templeton, quinta))\nforall x (Gloss(x, carolann) -> Clubbable(carolann))\nforall x (Clubbable(x) and Gloss(x, enrique) -> Farce(enrique, quinta))\n\nnot Jell(quinta, carolann)\n\ntherefore Jell(quinta, carolann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The brynna is humbled. The brynna swerve the waiter. The vincent is precise. The vincent is humbled. The vincent cricket the dyson. The vincent swerve the brynna. The vincent grope the dyson. The dyson grope the brynna. The waiter cricket the brynna. The waiter swerve the brynna. If someone swerve the brynna and the brynna cricket the dyson then the dyson grope the waiter. If someone cricket the vincent and the vincent is abulic then they are humbled. If someone grope the brynna then the brynna swerve the dyson. If someone swerve the brynna then they need the vincent. If someone swerve the brynna and they see the brynna then they are lxxxii. If someone cricket the brynna and the brynna is precise then the brynna swerve the vincent. If someone swerve the dyson then the dyson is lxxxii. If someone is lxxxii and they need the waiter then the waiter cricket the vincent. The waiter swerve the vincent.", "logic": "\nHumbled(brynna)\nSwerve(brynna, waiter)\nPrecise(vincent)\nHumbled(vincent)\nCricket(vincent, dyson)\nSwerve(vincent, brynna)\nGrope(vincent, dyson)\nGrope(dyson, brynna)\nCricket(waiter, brynna)\nSwerve(waiter, brynna)\nforall x (Swerve(x, brynna) and Cricket(brynna, dyson) -> Grope(dyson, waiter))\nforall x (Cricket(x, vincent) and Abulic(vincent) -> Humbled(x))\nforall x (Grope(x, brynna) -> Swerve(brynna, dyson))\nforall x (Swerve(x, brynna) -> Swerve(x, vincent))\nforall x (Swerve(x, brynna) and Grope(x, brynna) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Cricket(x, brynna) and Precise(brynna) -> Swerve(brynna, vincent))\nforall x (Swerve(x, dyson) -> Lxxxii(dyson))\nforall x (Lxxxii(x) and Swerve(x, waiter) -> Cricket(waiter, vincent))\n\nSwerve(waiter, vincent)\n\nSwerve(waiter, brynna) and forall x (Swerve(x, brynna) -> Swerve(x, vincent)) -> therefore Swerve(waiter, vincent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The rosemary is knockout. The rosemary whoosh the hester. The natalee is hanoverian. The natalee is knockout. The natalee bejewel the wandie. The natalee whoosh the rosemary. The natalee unionize the wandie. The wandie unionize the rosemary. The hester bejewel the rosemary. The hester whoosh the rosemary. If someone whoosh the rosemary and the rosemary bejewel the wandie then the wandie unionize the hester. If someone bejewel the natalee and the natalee is retroflex then they are knockout. If someone unionize the rosemary then the rosemary whoosh the wandie. If someone whoosh the rosemary then they need the natalee. If someone whoosh the rosemary and they see the rosemary then they are lymphoid. If someone bejewel the rosemary and the rosemary is hanoverian then the rosemary whoosh the natalee. If someone whoosh the wandie then the wandie is lymphoid. If someone is lymphoid and they need the hester then the hester bejewel the natalee. The hester does not need the natalee.", "logic": "\nKnockout(rosemary)\nWhoosh(rosemary, hester)\nHanoverian(natalee)\nKnockout(natalee)\nBejewel(natalee, wandie)\nWhoosh(natalee, rosemary)\nUnionize(natalee, wandie)\nUnionize(wandie, rosemary)\nBejewel(hester, rosemary)\nWhoosh(hester, rosemary)\nforall x (Whoosh(x, rosemary) and Bejewel(rosemary, wandie) -> Unionize(wandie, hester))\nforall x (Bejewel(x, natalee) and Retroflex(natalee) -> Knockout(x))\nforall x (Unionize(x, rosemary) -> Whoosh(rosemary, wandie))\nforall x (Whoosh(x, rosemary) -> Whoosh(x, natalee))\nforall x (Whoosh(x, rosemary) and Unionize(x, rosemary) -> Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Bejewel(x, rosemary) and Hanoverian(rosemary) -> Whoosh(rosemary, natalee))\nforall x (Whoosh(x, wandie) -> Lymphoid(wandie))\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) and Whoosh(x, hester) -> Bejewel(hester, natalee))\n\nnot Whoosh(hester, natalee)\n\nWhoosh(hester, rosemary) and forall x (Whoosh(x, rosemary) -> Whoosh(x, natalee)) -> therefore Whoosh(hester, natalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The violetta is puppylike. The violetta misdemean the erminie. The fawne is mazy. The fawne is puppylike. The fawne madrigal the clement. The fawne misdemean the violetta. The fawne book the clement. The clement book the violetta. The erminie madrigal the violetta. The erminie misdemean the violetta. If someone misdemean the violetta and the violetta madrigal the clement then the clement book the erminie. If someone madrigal the fawne and the fawne is behavioral then they are puppylike. If someone book the violetta then the violetta misdemean the clement. If someone misdemean the violetta then they need the fawne. If someone misdemean the violetta and they see the violetta then they are carbuncled. If someone madrigal the violetta and the violetta is mazy then the violetta misdemean the fawne. If someone misdemean the clement then the clement is carbuncled. If someone is carbuncled and they need the erminie then the erminie madrigal the fawne. The clement is carbuncled.", "logic": "\nPuppylike(violetta)\nMisdemean(violetta, erminie)\nMazy(fawne)\nPuppylike(fawne)\nMadrigal(fawne, clement)\nMisdemean(fawne, violetta)\nBook(fawne, clement)\nBook(clement, violetta)\nMadrigal(erminie, violetta)\nMisdemean(erminie, violetta)\nforall x (Misdemean(x, violetta) and Madrigal(violetta, clement) -> Book(clement, erminie))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, fawne) and Behavioral(fawne) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Book(x, violetta) -> Misdemean(violetta, clement))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, violetta) -> Misdemean(x, fawne))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, violetta) and Book(x, violetta) -> Carbuncled(x))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, violetta) and Mazy(violetta) -> Misdemean(violetta, fawne))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, clement) -> Carbuncled(clement))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) and Misdemean(x, erminie) -> Madrigal(erminie, fawne))\n\nCarbuncled(clement)\n\nBook(clement, violetta) and forall x (Book(x, violetta) -> Misdemean(violetta, clement)) -> therefore Misdemean(violetta, clement) Misdemean(violetta, clement) and forall x (Misdemean(x, clement) -> Carbuncled(clement)) -> therefore Carbuncled(clement)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The franciska is awry. The franciska marbleise the prudy. The yanaton is awol. The yanaton is awry. The yanaton reinstall the rorie. The yanaton marbleise the franciska. The yanaton blacken the rorie. The rorie blacken the franciska. The prudy reinstall the franciska. The prudy marbleise the franciska. If someone marbleise the franciska and the franciska reinstall the rorie then the rorie blacken the prudy. If someone reinstall the yanaton and the yanaton is unwrapped then they are awry. If someone blacken the franciska then the franciska marbleise the rorie. If someone marbleise the franciska then they need the yanaton. If someone marbleise the franciska and they see the franciska then they are baboonish. If someone reinstall the franciska and the franciska is awol then the franciska marbleise the yanaton. If someone marbleise the rorie then the rorie is baboonish. If someone is baboonish and they need the prudy then the prudy reinstall the yanaton. The rorie is not baboonish.", "logic": "\nAwry(franciska)\nMarbleise(franciska, prudy)\nAwol(yanaton)\nAwry(yanaton)\nReinstall(yanaton, rorie)\nMarbleise(yanaton, franciska)\nBlacken(yanaton, rorie)\nBlacken(rorie, franciska)\nReinstall(prudy, franciska)\nMarbleise(prudy, franciska)\nforall x (Marbleise(x, franciska) and Reinstall(franciska, rorie) -> Blacken(rorie, prudy))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, yanaton) and Unwrapped(yanaton) -> Awry(x))\nforall x (Blacken(x, franciska) -> Marbleise(franciska, rorie))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, franciska) -> Marbleise(x, yanaton))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, franciska) and Blacken(x, franciska) -> Baboonish(x))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, franciska) and Awol(franciska) -> Marbleise(franciska, yanaton))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, rorie) -> Baboonish(rorie))\nforall x (Baboonish(x) and Marbleise(x, prudy) -> Reinstall(prudy, yanaton))\n\nnot Baboonish(rorie)\n\nBlacken(rorie, franciska) and forall x (Blacken(x, franciska) -> Marbleise(franciska, rorie)) -> therefore Marbleise(franciska, rorie) Marbleise(franciska, rorie) and forall x (Marbleise(x, rorie) -> Baboonish(rorie)) -> therefore Baboonish(rorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The marcie is cropped. The marcie ease the sherri. The marcos is twee. The marcos is cropped. The marcos whirlpool the darth. The marcos ease the marcie. The marcos closure the darth. The darth closure the marcie. The sherri whirlpool the marcie. The sherri ease the marcie. If someone ease the marcie and the marcie whirlpool the darth then the darth closure the sherri. If someone whirlpool the marcos and the marcos is audacious then they are cropped. If someone closure the marcie then the marcie ease the darth. If someone ease the marcie then they need the marcos. If someone ease the marcie and they see the marcie then they are ephemeral. If someone whirlpool the marcie and the marcie is twee then the marcie ease the marcos. If someone ease the darth then the darth is ephemeral. If someone is ephemeral and they need the sherri then the sherri whirlpool the marcos. The sherri is not cropped.", "logic": "\nCropped(marcie)\nEase(marcie, sherri)\nTwee(marcos)\nCropped(marcos)\nWhirlpool(marcos, darth)\nEase(marcos, marcie)\nClosure(marcos, darth)\nClosure(darth, marcie)\nWhirlpool(sherri, marcie)\nEase(sherri, marcie)\nforall x (Ease(x, marcie) and Whirlpool(marcie, darth) -> Closure(darth, sherri))\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, marcos) and Audacious(marcos) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Closure(x, marcie) -> Ease(marcie, darth))\nforall x (Ease(x, marcie) -> Ease(x, marcos))\nforall x (Ease(x, marcie) and Closure(x, marcie) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, marcie) and Twee(marcie) -> Ease(marcie, marcos))\nforall x (Ease(x, darth) -> Ephemeral(darth))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and Ease(x, sherri) -> Whirlpool(sherri, marcos))\n\nnot Cropped(sherri)\n\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, marcos) and Audacious(marcos) -> Cropped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The karen is weblike. The karen telex the rogers. The letta is leased. The letta is weblike. The letta roughcast the archy. The letta telex the karen. The letta ware the archy. The archy ware the karen. The rogers roughcast the karen. The rogers telex the karen. If someone telex the karen and the karen roughcast the archy then the archy ware the rogers. If someone roughcast the letta and the letta is plowed then they are weblike. If someone ware the karen then the karen telex the archy. If someone telex the karen then they need the letta. If someone telex the karen and they see the karen then they are astronomic. If someone roughcast the karen and the karen is leased then the karen telex the letta. If someone telex the archy then the archy is astronomic. If someone is astronomic and they need the rogers then the rogers roughcast the letta. The archy telex the letta.", "logic": "\nWeblike(karen)\nTelex(karen, rogers)\nLeased(letta)\nWeblike(letta)\nRoughcast(letta, archy)\nTelex(letta, karen)\nWare(letta, archy)\nWare(archy, karen)\nRoughcast(rogers, karen)\nTelex(rogers, karen)\nforall x (Telex(x, karen) and Roughcast(karen, archy) -> Ware(archy, rogers))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, letta) and Plowed(letta) -> Weblike(x))\nforall x (Ware(x, karen) -> Telex(karen, archy))\nforall x (Telex(x, karen) -> Telex(x, letta))\nforall x (Telex(x, karen) and Ware(x, karen) -> Astronomic(x))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, karen) and Leased(karen) -> Telex(karen, letta))\nforall x (Telex(x, archy) -> Astronomic(archy))\nforall x (Astronomic(x) and Telex(x, rogers) -> Roughcast(rogers, letta))\n\nTelex(archy, letta)\n\nforall x (Telex(x, karen) -> Telex(x, letta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The jerrine is worrying. The jerrine goad the karyn. The frieda is bifilar. The frieda is worrying. The frieda deforest the gladis. The frieda goad the jerrine. The frieda formulate the gladis. The gladis formulate the jerrine. The karyn deforest the jerrine. The karyn goad the jerrine. If someone goad the jerrine and the jerrine deforest the gladis then the gladis formulate the karyn. If someone deforest the frieda and the frieda is downscale then they are worrying. If someone formulate the jerrine then the jerrine goad the gladis. If someone goad the jerrine then they need the frieda. If someone goad the jerrine and they see the jerrine then they are snarled. If someone deforest the jerrine and the jerrine is bifilar then the jerrine goad the frieda. If someone goad the gladis then the gladis is snarled. If someone is snarled and they need the karyn then the karyn deforest the frieda. The gladis is not worrying.", "logic": "\nWorrying(jerrine)\nGoad(jerrine, karyn)\nBifilar(frieda)\nWorrying(frieda)\nDeforest(frieda, gladis)\nGoad(frieda, jerrine)\nFormulate(frieda, gladis)\nFormulate(gladis, jerrine)\nDeforest(karyn, jerrine)\nGoad(karyn, jerrine)\nforall x (Goad(x, jerrine) and Deforest(jerrine, gladis) -> Formulate(gladis, karyn))\nforall x (Deforest(x, frieda) and Downscale(frieda) -> Worrying(x))\nforall x (Formulate(x, jerrine) -> Goad(jerrine, gladis))\nforall x (Goad(x, jerrine) -> Goad(x, frieda))\nforall x (Goad(x, jerrine) and Formulate(x, jerrine) -> Snarled(x))\nforall x (Deforest(x, jerrine) and Bifilar(jerrine) -> Goad(jerrine, frieda))\nforall x (Goad(x, gladis) -> Snarled(gladis))\nforall x (Snarled(x) and Goad(x, karyn) -> Deforest(karyn, frieda))\n\nnot Worrying(gladis)\n\nforall x (Deforest(x, frieda) and Downscale(frieda) -> Worrying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The fae is unimproved. The fae refill the jake. The morena is pediatric. The morena is unimproved. The morena glamorize the garwood. The morena refill the fae. The morena whirlpool the garwood. The garwood whirlpool the fae. The jake glamorize the fae. The jake refill the fae. If someone refill the fae and the fae glamorize the garwood then the garwood whirlpool the jake. If someone glamorize the morena and the morena is secluded then they are unimproved. If someone whirlpool the fae then the fae refill the garwood. If someone refill the fae then they need the morena. If someone refill the fae and they see the fae then they are fitted. If someone glamorize the fae and the fae is pediatric then the fae refill the morena. If someone refill the garwood then the garwood is fitted. If someone is fitted and they need the jake then the jake glamorize the morena. The morena is cold.", "logic": "\nUnimproved(fae)\nRefill(fae, jake)\nPediatric(morena)\nUnimproved(morena)\nGlamorize(morena, garwood)\nRefill(morena, fae)\nWhirlpool(morena, garwood)\nWhirlpool(garwood, fae)\nGlamorize(jake, fae)\nRefill(jake, fae)\nforall x (Refill(x, fae) and Glamorize(fae, garwood) -> Whirlpool(garwood, jake))\nforall x (Glamorize(x, morena) and Secluded(morena) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, fae) -> Refill(fae, garwood))\nforall x (Refill(x, fae) -> Refill(x, morena))\nforall x (Refill(x, fae) and Whirlpool(x, fae) -> Fitted(x))\nforall x (Glamorize(x, fae) and Pediatric(fae) -> Refill(fae, morena))\nforall x (Refill(x, garwood) -> Fitted(garwood))\nforall x (Fitted(x) and Refill(x, jake) -> Glamorize(jake, morena))\n\nCold(morena)\n\nCold(morena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The barthel is hirsute. The barthel delocalize the anitra. The karyl is mixable. The karyl is hirsute. The karyl jell the cristi. The karyl delocalize the barthel. The karyl assuage the cristi. The cristi assuage the barthel. The anitra jell the barthel. The anitra delocalize the barthel. If someone delocalize the barthel and the barthel jell the cristi then the cristi assuage the anitra. If someone jell the karyl and the karyl is baking then they are hirsute. If someone assuage the barthel then the barthel delocalize the cristi. If someone delocalize the barthel then they need the karyl. If someone delocalize the barthel and they see the barthel then they are evacuant. If someone jell the barthel and the barthel is mixable then the barthel delocalize the karyl. If someone delocalize the cristi then the cristi is evacuant. If someone is evacuant and they need the anitra then the anitra jell the karyl. The karyl does not like the karyl.", "logic": "\nHirsute(barthel)\nDelocalize(barthel, anitra)\nMixable(karyl)\nHirsute(karyl)\nJell(karyl, cristi)\nDelocalize(karyl, barthel)\nAssuage(karyl, cristi)\nAssuage(cristi, barthel)\nJell(anitra, barthel)\nDelocalize(anitra, barthel)\nforall x (Delocalize(x, barthel) and Jell(barthel, cristi) -> Assuage(cristi, anitra))\nforall x (Jell(x, karyl) and Baking(karyl) -> Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Assuage(x, barthel) -> Delocalize(barthel, cristi))\nforall x (Delocalize(x, barthel) -> Delocalize(x, karyl))\nforall x (Delocalize(x, barthel) and Assuage(x, barthel) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Jell(x, barthel) and Mixable(barthel) -> Delocalize(barthel, karyl))\nforall x (Delocalize(x, cristi) -> Evacuant(cristi))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) and Delocalize(x, anitra) -> Jell(anitra, karyl))\n\nnot Jell(karyl, karyl)\n\nnot Jell(karyl, karyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The bertram is bloodshot. The bertram spondaize the locke. The lazaro is sterile. The lazaro is bloodshot. The lazaro slurp the sergent. The lazaro spondaize the bertram. The lazaro caliper the sergent. The sergent caliper the bertram. The locke slurp the bertram. The locke spondaize the bertram. If someone spondaize the bertram and the bertram slurp the sergent then the sergent caliper the locke. If someone slurp the lazaro and the lazaro is freaky then they are bloodshot. If someone caliper the bertram then the bertram spondaize the sergent. If someone spondaize the bertram then they need the lazaro. If someone spondaize the bertram and they see the bertram then they are quadruped. If someone slurp the bertram and the bertram is sterile then the bertram spondaize the lazaro. If someone spondaize the sergent then the sergent is quadruped. If someone is quadruped and they need the locke then the locke slurp the lazaro. The bertram caliper the lazaro.", "logic": "\nBloodshot(bertram)\nSpondaize(bertram, locke)\nSterile(lazaro)\nBloodshot(lazaro)\nSlurp(lazaro, sergent)\nSpondaize(lazaro, bertram)\nCaliper(lazaro, sergent)\nCaliper(sergent, bertram)\nSlurp(locke, bertram)\nSpondaize(locke, bertram)\nforall x (Spondaize(x, bertram) and Slurp(bertram, sergent) -> Caliper(sergent, locke))\nforall x (Slurp(x, lazaro) and Freaky(lazaro) -> Bloodshot(x))\nforall x (Caliper(x, bertram) -> Spondaize(bertram, sergent))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, bertram) -> Spondaize(x, lazaro))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, bertram) and Caliper(x, bertram) -> Quadruped(x))\nforall x (Slurp(x, bertram) and Sterile(bertram) -> Spondaize(bertram, lazaro))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, sergent) -> Quadruped(sergent))\nforall x (Quadruped(x) and Spondaize(x, locke) -> Slurp(locke, lazaro))\n\nCaliper(bertram, lazaro)\n\nCaliper(bertram, lazaro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The cyndi loathe the andonis. The cyndi vulgarise the andonis. The cyndi vulgarise the leta. The gayla loathe the andonis. The gayla vulgarise the leta. The andonis loathe the leta. The andonis vulgarise the leta. The andonis partner the cyndi. The andonis partner the leta. The leta is haematic. The leta is untangled. The leta is delusional. The leta loathe the cyndi. The leta vulgarise the gayla. The leta vulgarise the andonis. If someone partner the andonis and the andonis is quack then they visit the gayla. If someone vulgarise the andonis then they visit the gayla. If someone vulgarise the leta then the leta partner the gayla. If someone loathe the cyndi then they need the gayla. If someone vulgarise the leta then they like the cyndi. If someone partner the cyndi then they are haematic. The leta loathe the cyndi.", "logic": "\nLoathe(cyndi, andonis)\nVulgarise(cyndi, andonis)\nVulgarise(cyndi, leta)\nLoathe(gayla, andonis)\nVulgarise(gayla, leta)\nLoathe(andonis, leta)\nVulgarise(andonis, leta)\nPartner(andonis, cyndi)\nPartner(andonis, leta)\nHaematic(leta)\nUntangled(leta)\nDelusional(leta)\nLoathe(leta, cyndi)\nVulgarise(leta, gayla)\nVulgarise(leta, andonis)\nforall x (Partner(x, andonis) and Quack(andonis) -> Partner(x, gayla))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, andonis) -> Partner(x, gayla))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, leta) -> Partner(leta, gayla))\nforall x (Loathe(x, cyndi) -> Vulgarise(x, gayla))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, leta) -> Loathe(x, cyndi))\nforall x (Partner(x, cyndi) -> Haematic(x))\n\nLoathe(leta, cyndi)\n\ntherefore Loathe(leta, cyndi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The kandy spout the dedra. The kandy reassert the dedra. The kandy reassert the abram. The sander spout the dedra. The sander reassert the abram. The dedra spout the abram. The dedra reassert the abram. The dedra braise the kandy. The dedra braise the abram. The abram is rotted. The abram is quick. The abram is echoless. The abram spout the kandy. The abram reassert the sander. The abram reassert the dedra. If someone braise the dedra and the dedra is academic then they visit the sander. If someone reassert the dedra then they visit the sander. If someone reassert the abram then the abram braise the sander. If someone spout the kandy then they need the sander. If someone reassert the abram then they like the kandy. If someone braise the kandy then they are rotted. The abram is not rotted.", "logic": "\nSpout(kandy, dedra)\nReassert(kandy, dedra)\nReassert(kandy, abram)\nSpout(sander, dedra)\nReassert(sander, abram)\nSpout(dedra, abram)\nReassert(dedra, abram)\nBraise(dedra, kandy)\nBraise(dedra, abram)\nRotted(abram)\nQuick(abram)\nEcholess(abram)\nSpout(abram, kandy)\nReassert(abram, sander)\nReassert(abram, dedra)\nforall x (Braise(x, dedra) and Academic(dedra) -> Braise(x, sander))\nforall x (Reassert(x, dedra) -> Braise(x, sander))\nforall x (Reassert(x, abram) -> Braise(abram, sander))\nforall x (Spout(x, kandy) -> Reassert(x, sander))\nforall x (Reassert(x, abram) -> Spout(x, kandy))\nforall x (Braise(x, kandy) -> Rotted(x))\n\nnot Rotted(abram)\n\ntherefore Rotted(abram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The parke hearken the halvard. The parke remember the halvard. The parke remember the ruthanne. The rebeka hearken the halvard. The rebeka remember the ruthanne. The halvard hearken the ruthanne. The halvard remember the ruthanne. The halvard turn the parke. The halvard turn the ruthanne. The ruthanne is hemostatic. The ruthanne is humiliated. The ruthanne is exclusive. The ruthanne hearken the parke. The ruthanne remember the rebeka. The ruthanne remember the halvard. If someone turn the halvard and the halvard is hemostatic then they visit the rebeka. If someone remember the halvard then they visit the rebeka. If someone remember the ruthanne then the ruthanne turn the rebeka. If someone hearken the parke then they need the rebeka. If someone remember the ruthanne then they like the parke. If someone turn the parke then they are hemostatic. The parke hearken the parke.", "logic": "\nHearken(parke, halvard)\nRemember(parke, halvard)\nRemember(parke, ruthanne)\nHearken(rebeka, halvard)\nRemember(rebeka, ruthanne)\nHearken(halvard, ruthanne)\nRemember(halvard, ruthanne)\nTurn(halvard, parke)\nTurn(halvard, ruthanne)\nHemostatic(ruthanne)\nHumiliated(ruthanne)\nExclusive(ruthanne)\nHearken(ruthanne, parke)\nRemember(ruthanne, rebeka)\nRemember(ruthanne, halvard)\nforall x (Turn(x, halvard) and Hemostatic(halvard) -> Turn(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Remember(x, halvard) -> Turn(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Remember(x, ruthanne) -> Turn(ruthanne, rebeka))\nforall x (Hearken(x, parke) -> Remember(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Remember(x, ruthanne) -> Hearken(x, parke))\nforall x (Turn(x, parke) -> Hemostatic(x))\n\nHearken(parke, parke)\n\nRemember(parke, ruthanne) and forall x (Remember(x, ruthanne) -> Hearken(x, parke)) -> therefore Hearken(parke, parke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The calida vroom the othilie. The calida lyophilize the othilie. The calida lyophilize the richard. The morganne vroom the othilie. The morganne lyophilize the richard. The othilie vroom the richard. The othilie lyophilize the richard. The othilie signal the calida. The othilie signal the richard. The richard is acropetal. The richard is nucleate. The richard is psychical. The richard vroom the calida. The richard lyophilize the morganne. The richard lyophilize the othilie. If someone signal the othilie and the othilie is clubbable then they visit the morganne. If someone lyophilize the othilie then they visit the morganne. If someone lyophilize the richard then the richard signal the morganne. If someone vroom the calida then they need the morganne. If someone lyophilize the richard then they like the calida. If someone signal the calida then they are acropetal. The calida does not visit the morganne.", "logic": "\nVroom(calida, othilie)\nLyophilize(calida, othilie)\nLyophilize(calida, richard)\nVroom(morganne, othilie)\nLyophilize(morganne, richard)\nVroom(othilie, richard)\nLyophilize(othilie, richard)\nSignal(othilie, calida)\nSignal(othilie, richard)\nAcropetal(richard)\nNucleate(richard)\nPsychical(richard)\nVroom(richard, calida)\nLyophilize(richard, morganne)\nLyophilize(richard, othilie)\nforall x (Signal(x, othilie) and Clubbable(othilie) -> Signal(x, morganne))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, othilie) -> Signal(x, morganne))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, richard) -> Signal(richard, morganne))\nforall x (Vroom(x, calida) -> Lyophilize(x, morganne))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, richard) -> Vroom(x, calida))\nforall x (Signal(x, calida) -> Acropetal(x))\n\nnot Signal(calida, morganne)\n\nLyophilize(calida, othilie) and forall x (Lyophilize(x, othilie) -> Signal(x, morganne)) -> therefore Signal(calida, morganne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The neilla lipread the cyrill. The neilla deform the cyrill. The neilla deform the dom. The godart lipread the cyrill. The godart deform the dom. The cyrill lipread the dom. The cyrill deform the dom. The cyrill tire the neilla. The cyrill tire the dom. The dom is warring. The dom is japanese. The dom is sozzled. The dom lipread the neilla. The dom deform the godart. The dom deform the cyrill. If someone tire the cyrill and the cyrill is cylindric then they visit the godart. If someone deform the cyrill then they visit the godart. If someone deform the dom then the dom tire the godart. If someone lipread the neilla then they need the godart. If someone deform the dom then they like the neilla. If someone tire the neilla then they are warring. The neilla deform the godart.", "logic": "\nLipread(neilla, cyrill)\nDeform(neilla, cyrill)\nDeform(neilla, dom)\nLipread(godart, cyrill)\nDeform(godart, dom)\nLipread(cyrill, dom)\nDeform(cyrill, dom)\nTire(cyrill, neilla)\nTire(cyrill, dom)\nWarring(dom)\nJapanese(dom)\nSozzled(dom)\nLipread(dom, neilla)\nDeform(dom, godart)\nDeform(dom, cyrill)\nforall x (Tire(x, cyrill) and Cylindric(cyrill) -> Tire(x, godart))\nforall x (Deform(x, cyrill) -> Tire(x, godart))\nforall x (Deform(x, dom) -> Tire(dom, godart))\nforall x (Lipread(x, neilla) -> Deform(x, godart))\nforall x (Deform(x, dom) -> Lipread(x, neilla))\nforall x (Tire(x, neilla) -> Warring(x))\n\nDeform(neilla, godart)\n\nDeform(neilla, dom) and forall x (Deform(x, dom) -> Lipread(x, neilla)) -> therefore Lipread(neilla, neilla) Lipread(neilla, neilla) and forall x (Lipread(x, neilla) -> Deform(x, godart)) -> therefore Deform(neilla, godart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The leigh fantasise the christal. The leigh raft the christal. The leigh raft the ulrika. The cornelia fantasise the christal. The cornelia raft the ulrika. The christal fantasise the ulrika. The christal raft the ulrika. The christal debit the leigh. The christal debit the ulrika. The ulrika is clitoral. The ulrika is weather. The ulrika is corny. The ulrika fantasise the leigh. The ulrika raft the cornelia. The ulrika raft the christal. If someone debit the christal and the christal is gainly then they visit the cornelia. If someone raft the christal then they visit the cornelia. If someone raft the ulrika then the ulrika debit the cornelia. If someone fantasise the leigh then they need the cornelia. If someone raft the ulrika then they like the leigh. If someone debit the leigh then they are clitoral. The christal does not need the cornelia.", "logic": "\nFantasise(leigh, christal)\nRaft(leigh, christal)\nRaft(leigh, ulrika)\nFantasise(cornelia, christal)\nRaft(cornelia, ulrika)\nFantasise(christal, ulrika)\nRaft(christal, ulrika)\nDebit(christal, leigh)\nDebit(christal, ulrika)\nClitoral(ulrika)\nWeather(ulrika)\nCorny(ulrika)\nFantasise(ulrika, leigh)\nRaft(ulrika, cornelia)\nRaft(ulrika, christal)\nforall x (Debit(x, christal) and Gainly(christal) -> Debit(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Raft(x, christal) -> Debit(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Raft(x, ulrika) -> Debit(ulrika, cornelia))\nforall x (Fantasise(x, leigh) -> Raft(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Raft(x, ulrika) -> Fantasise(x, leigh))\nforall x (Debit(x, leigh) -> Clitoral(x))\n\nnot Raft(christal, cornelia)\n\nRaft(christal, ulrika) and forall x (Raft(x, ulrika) -> Fantasise(x, leigh)) -> therefore Fantasise(christal, leigh) Fantasise(christal, leigh) and forall x (Fantasise(x, leigh) -> Raft(x, cornelia)) -> therefore Raft(christal, cornelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The ginnifer dirty the lynnet. The ginnifer lick the lynnet. The ginnifer lick the kristos. The dougie dirty the lynnet. The dougie lick the kristos. The lynnet dirty the kristos. The lynnet lick the kristos. The lynnet destain the ginnifer. The lynnet destain the kristos. The kristos is apodeictic. The kristos is paradisiac. The kristos is outclassed. The kristos dirty the ginnifer. The kristos lick the dougie. The kristos lick the lynnet. If someone destain the lynnet and the lynnet is rimed then they visit the dougie. If someone lick the lynnet then they visit the dougie. If someone lick the kristos then the kristos destain the dougie. If someone dirty the ginnifer then they need the dougie. If someone lick the kristos then they like the ginnifer. If someone destain the ginnifer then they are apodeictic. The ginnifer is not apodeictic.", "logic": "\nDirty(ginnifer, lynnet)\nLick(ginnifer, lynnet)\nLick(ginnifer, kristos)\nDirty(dougie, lynnet)\nLick(dougie, kristos)\nDirty(lynnet, kristos)\nLick(lynnet, kristos)\nDestain(lynnet, ginnifer)\nDestain(lynnet, kristos)\nApodeictic(kristos)\nParadisiac(kristos)\nOutclassed(kristos)\nDirty(kristos, ginnifer)\nLick(kristos, dougie)\nLick(kristos, lynnet)\nforall x (Destain(x, lynnet) and Rimed(lynnet) -> Destain(x, dougie))\nforall x (Lick(x, lynnet) -> Destain(x, dougie))\nforall x (Lick(x, kristos) -> Destain(kristos, dougie))\nforall x (Dirty(x, ginnifer) -> Lick(x, dougie))\nforall x (Lick(x, kristos) -> Dirty(x, ginnifer))\nforall x (Destain(x, ginnifer) -> Apodeictic(x))\n\nnot Apodeictic(ginnifer)\n\nforall x (Destain(x, ginnifer) -> Apodeictic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The emmey jollify the caressa. The emmey bubble the caressa. The emmey bubble the hyacinth. The danice jollify the caressa. The danice bubble the hyacinth. The caressa jollify the hyacinth. The caressa bubble the hyacinth. The caressa cache the emmey. The caressa cache the hyacinth. The hyacinth is cloistral. The hyacinth is toned. The hyacinth is basifixed. The hyacinth jollify the emmey. The hyacinth bubble the danice. The hyacinth bubble the caressa. If someone cache the caressa and the caressa is mortal then they visit the danice. If someone bubble the caressa then they visit the danice. If someone bubble the hyacinth then the hyacinth cache the danice. If someone jollify the emmey then they need the danice. If someone bubble the hyacinth then they like the emmey. If someone cache the emmey then they are cloistral. The danice is cloistral.", "logic": "\nJollify(emmey, caressa)\nBubble(emmey, caressa)\nBubble(emmey, hyacinth)\nJollify(danice, caressa)\nBubble(danice, hyacinth)\nJollify(caressa, hyacinth)\nBubble(caressa, hyacinth)\nCache(caressa, emmey)\nCache(caressa, hyacinth)\nCloistral(hyacinth)\nToned(hyacinth)\nBasifixed(hyacinth)\nJollify(hyacinth, emmey)\nBubble(hyacinth, danice)\nBubble(hyacinth, caressa)\nforall x (Cache(x, caressa) and Mortal(caressa) -> Cache(x, danice))\nforall x (Bubble(x, caressa) -> Cache(x, danice))\nforall x (Bubble(x, hyacinth) -> Cache(hyacinth, danice))\nforall x (Jollify(x, emmey) -> Bubble(x, danice))\nforall x (Bubble(x, hyacinth) -> Jollify(x, emmey))\nforall x (Cache(x, emmey) -> Cloistral(x))\n\nCloistral(danice)\n\nforall x (Cache(x, emmey) -> Cloistral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The gamaliel mingle the tracee. The gamaliel notarize the tracee. The gamaliel notarize the althea. The mellissa mingle the tracee. The mellissa notarize the althea. The tracee mingle the althea. The tracee notarize the althea. The tracee emulsify the gamaliel. The tracee emulsify the althea. The althea is feral. The althea is ammoniac. The althea is strenuous. The althea mingle the gamaliel. The althea notarize the mellissa. The althea notarize the tracee. If someone emulsify the tracee and the tracee is unloved then they visit the mellissa. If someone notarize the tracee then they visit the mellissa. If someone notarize the althea then the althea emulsify the mellissa. If someone mingle the gamaliel then they need the mellissa. If someone notarize the althea then they like the gamaliel. If someone emulsify the gamaliel then they are feral. The mellissa does not visit the mellissa.", "logic": "\nMingle(gamaliel, tracee)\nNotarize(gamaliel, tracee)\nNotarize(gamaliel, althea)\nMingle(mellissa, tracee)\nNotarize(mellissa, althea)\nMingle(tracee, althea)\nNotarize(tracee, althea)\nEmulsify(tracee, gamaliel)\nEmulsify(tracee, althea)\nFeral(althea)\nAmmoniac(althea)\nStrenuous(althea)\nMingle(althea, gamaliel)\nNotarize(althea, mellissa)\nNotarize(althea, tracee)\nforall x (Emulsify(x, tracee) and Unloved(tracee) -> Emulsify(x, mellissa))\nforall x (Notarize(x, tracee) -> Emulsify(x, mellissa))\nforall x (Notarize(x, althea) -> Emulsify(althea, mellissa))\nforall x (Mingle(x, gamaliel) -> Notarize(x, mellissa))\nforall x (Notarize(x, althea) -> Mingle(x, gamaliel))\nforall x (Emulsify(x, gamaliel) -> Feral(x))\n\nnot Emulsify(mellissa, mellissa)\n\nforall x (Emulsify(x, tracee) and Unloved(tracee) -> Emulsify(x, mellissa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The avie needle the hallam. The avie redden the hallam. The avie redden the mart. The gussie needle the hallam. The gussie redden the mart. The hallam needle the mart. The hallam redden the mart. The hallam debit the avie. The hallam debit the mart. The mart is insincere. The mart is polyvalent. The mart is swimming. The mart needle the avie. The mart redden the gussie. The mart redden the hallam. If someone debit the hallam and the hallam is perfected then they visit the gussie. If someone redden the hallam then they visit the gussie. If someone redden the mart then the mart debit the gussie. If someone needle the avie then they need the gussie. If someone redden the mart then they like the avie. If someone debit the avie then they are insincere. The gussie redden the avie.", "logic": "\nNeedle(avie, hallam)\nRedden(avie, hallam)\nRedden(avie, mart)\nNeedle(gussie, hallam)\nRedden(gussie, mart)\nNeedle(hallam, mart)\nRedden(hallam, mart)\nDebit(hallam, avie)\nDebit(hallam, mart)\nInsincere(mart)\nPolyvalent(mart)\nSwimming(mart)\nNeedle(mart, avie)\nRedden(mart, gussie)\nRedden(mart, hallam)\nforall x (Debit(x, hallam) and Perfected(hallam) -> Debit(x, gussie))\nforall x (Redden(x, hallam) -> Debit(x, gussie))\nforall x (Redden(x, mart) -> Debit(mart, gussie))\nforall x (Needle(x, avie) -> Redden(x, gussie))\nforall x (Redden(x, mart) -> Needle(x, avie))\nforall x (Debit(x, avie) -> Insincere(x))\n\nRedden(gussie, avie)\n\nRedden(gussie, avie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The kerianne misspeak the carlynne. The kerianne cache the carlynne. The kerianne cache the meira. The nissa misspeak the carlynne. The nissa cache the meira. The carlynne misspeak the meira. The carlynne cache the meira. The carlynne exchange the kerianne. The carlynne exchange the meira. The meira is ephesian. The meira is numerous. The meira is errhine. The meira misspeak the kerianne. The meira cache the nissa. The meira cache the carlynne. If someone exchange the carlynne and the carlynne is fineable then they visit the nissa. If someone cache the carlynne then they visit the nissa. If someone cache the meira then the meira exchange the nissa. If someone misspeak the kerianne then they need the nissa. If someone cache the meira then they like the kerianne. If someone exchange the kerianne then they are ephesian. The kerianne does not visit the kerianne.", "logic": "\nMisspeak(kerianne, carlynne)\nCache(kerianne, carlynne)\nCache(kerianne, meira)\nMisspeak(nissa, carlynne)\nCache(nissa, meira)\nMisspeak(carlynne, meira)\nCache(carlynne, meira)\nExchange(carlynne, kerianne)\nExchange(carlynne, meira)\nEphesian(meira)\nNumerous(meira)\nErrhine(meira)\nMisspeak(meira, kerianne)\nCache(meira, nissa)\nCache(meira, carlynne)\nforall x (Exchange(x, carlynne) and Fineable(carlynne) -> Exchange(x, nissa))\nforall x (Cache(x, carlynne) -> Exchange(x, nissa))\nforall x (Cache(x, meira) -> Exchange(meira, nissa))\nforall x (Misspeak(x, kerianne) -> Cache(x, nissa))\nforall x (Cache(x, meira) -> Misspeak(x, kerianne))\nforall x (Exchange(x, kerianne) -> Ephesian(x))\n\nnot Exchange(kerianne, kerianne)\n\nnot Exchange(kerianne, kerianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The mahesh lapidify the puff. The mahesh roar the puff. The mahesh roar the jaquelyn. The kirsten lapidify the puff. The kirsten roar the jaquelyn. The puff lapidify the jaquelyn. The puff roar the jaquelyn. The puff islamise the mahesh. The puff islamise the jaquelyn. The jaquelyn is pimpled. The jaquelyn is tasteless. The jaquelyn is nicaean. The jaquelyn lapidify the mahesh. The jaquelyn roar the kirsten. The jaquelyn roar the puff. If someone islamise the puff and the puff is sublimated then they visit the kirsten. If someone roar the puff then they visit the kirsten. If someone roar the jaquelyn then the jaquelyn islamise the kirsten. If someone lapidify the mahesh then they need the kirsten. If someone roar the jaquelyn then they like the mahesh. If someone islamise the mahesh then they are pimpled. The jaquelyn islamise the jaquelyn.", "logic": "\nLapidify(mahesh, puff)\nRoar(mahesh, puff)\nRoar(mahesh, jaquelyn)\nLapidify(kirsten, puff)\nRoar(kirsten, jaquelyn)\nLapidify(puff, jaquelyn)\nRoar(puff, jaquelyn)\nIslamise(puff, mahesh)\nIslamise(puff, jaquelyn)\nPimpled(jaquelyn)\nTasteless(jaquelyn)\nNicaean(jaquelyn)\nLapidify(jaquelyn, mahesh)\nRoar(jaquelyn, kirsten)\nRoar(jaquelyn, puff)\nforall x (Islamise(x, puff) and Sublimated(puff) -> Islamise(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Roar(x, puff) -> Islamise(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Roar(x, jaquelyn) -> Islamise(jaquelyn, kirsten))\nforall x (Lapidify(x, mahesh) -> Roar(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Roar(x, jaquelyn) -> Lapidify(x, mahesh))\nforall x (Islamise(x, mahesh) -> Pimpled(x))\n\nIslamise(jaquelyn, jaquelyn)\n\nIslamise(jaquelyn, jaquelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1754"} {"premises": "The corina is triplex. The corina is sixfold. The corina is unweaned. If someone is ensiform then they are unweaned. Red people are unweaned. Cold, ensiform people are unweaned. Red people are unweaned. Red, hypnagogic people are unweaned. Nice people are not hypnagogic. All unweaned, sixfold people are ensiform. Nice people are sixfold. The corina is sixfold.", "logic": "\nTriplex(corina)\nSixfold(corina)\nUnweaned(corina)\nforall x (Ensiform(x) -> Unweaned(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) -> Unweaned(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) and Ensiform(x) -> Unweaned(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) -> Unweaned(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and Hypnagogic(x) -> Unweaned(x))\nforall x (Ensiform(x) -> not Hypnagogic(x))\nforall x (Unweaned(x) and Sixfold(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Ensiform(x) -> Sixfold(x))\n\nSixfold(corina)\n\ntherefore Sixfold(corina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The cacilia is adult. The cacilia is unsavoury. The cacilia is hobnailed. If someone is pumped then they are hobnailed. Red people are hobnailed. Cold, pumped people are hobnailed. Red people are hobnailed. Red, stinging people are hobnailed. Nice people are not stinging. All hobnailed, unsavoury people are pumped. Nice people are unsavoury. The cacilia is not hobnailed.", "logic": "\nAdult(cacilia)\nUnsavoury(cacilia)\nHobnailed(cacilia)\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Adult(x) and Pumped(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) and Stinging(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> not Stinging(x))\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) and Unsavoury(x) -> Pumped(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> Unsavoury(x))\n\nnot Hobnailed(cacilia)\n\ntherefore Hobnailed(cacilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The istvan is endogenic. The istvan is microsomal. The istvan is quadratic. If someone is unremedied then they are quadratic. Red people are quadratic. Cold, unremedied people are quadratic. Red people are quadratic. Red, decreasing people are quadratic. Nice people are not decreasing. All quadratic, microsomal people are unremedied. Nice people are microsomal. The istvan is unremedied.", "logic": "\nEndogenic(istvan)\nMicrosomal(istvan)\nQuadratic(istvan)\nforall x (Unremedied(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) and Unremedied(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) and Decreasing(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) -> not Decreasing(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) and Microsomal(x) -> Unremedied(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) -> Microsomal(x))\n\nUnremedied(istvan)\n\nQuadratic(istvan) and Microsomal(istvan) and forall x (Quadratic(x) and Microsomal(x) -> Unremedied(x)) -> therefore Unremedied(istvan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The vikkie is incisive. The vikkie is assured. The vikkie is procurable. If someone is personal then they are procurable. Red people are procurable. Cold, personal people are procurable. Red people are procurable. Red, antique people are procurable. Nice people are not antique. All procurable, assured people are personal. Nice people are assured. The vikkie is not personal.", "logic": "\nIncisive(vikkie)\nAssured(vikkie)\nProcurable(vikkie)\nforall x (Personal(x) -> Procurable(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Procurable(x))\nforall x (Incisive(x) and Personal(x) -> Procurable(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Procurable(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) and Antique(x) -> Procurable(x))\nforall x (Personal(x) -> not Antique(x))\nforall x (Procurable(x) and Assured(x) -> Personal(x))\nforall x (Personal(x) -> Assured(x))\n\nnot Personal(vikkie)\n\nProcurable(vikkie) and Assured(vikkie) and forall x (Procurable(x) and Assured(x) -> Personal(x)) -> therefore Personal(vikkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The ansel is just. The ansel is paying. The ansel is plucky. If someone is cloven then they are plucky. Red people are plucky. Cold, cloven people are plucky. Red people are plucky. Red, emasculate people are plucky. Nice people are not emasculate. All plucky, paying people are cloven. Nice people are paying. The ansel is not emasculate.", "logic": "\nJust(ansel)\nPaying(ansel)\nPlucky(ansel)\nforall x (Cloven(x) -> Plucky(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Plucky(x))\nforall x (Just(x) and Cloven(x) -> Plucky(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Plucky(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) and Emasculate(x) -> Plucky(x))\nforall x (Cloven(x) -> not Emasculate(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and Paying(x) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Cloven(x) -> Paying(x))\n\nnot Emasculate(ansel)\n\nPlucky(ansel) and Paying(ansel) and forall x (Plucky(x) and Paying(x) -> Cloven(x)) -> therefore Cloven(ansel) Cloven(ansel) and forall x (Cloven(x) -> not Emasculate(x)) -> therefore not Emasculate(ansel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The marcelle is gangrenous. The marcelle is horrendous. The marcelle is levantine. If someone is altaic then they are levantine. Red people are levantine. Cold, altaic people are levantine. Red people are levantine. Red, larger people are levantine. Nice people are not larger. All levantine, horrendous people are altaic. Nice people are horrendous. The marcelle is larger.", "logic": "\nGangrenous(marcelle)\nHorrendous(marcelle)\nLevantine(marcelle)\nforall x (Altaic(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) and Altaic(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) and Larger(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Altaic(x) -> not Larger(x))\nforall x (Levantine(x) and Horrendous(x) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Altaic(x) -> Horrendous(x))\n\nLarger(marcelle)\n\nLevantine(marcelle) and Horrendous(marcelle) and forall x (Levantine(x) and Horrendous(x) -> Altaic(x)) -> therefore Altaic(marcelle) Altaic(marcelle) and forall x (Altaic(x) -> not Larger(x)) -> therefore not Larger(marcelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The olympia is peaceable. The olympia is quadruplex. The olympia is vapourish. If someone is cordiform then they are vapourish. Red people are vapourish. Cold, cordiform people are vapourish. Red people are vapourish. Red, minimum people are vapourish. Nice people are not minimum. All vapourish, quadruplex people are cordiform. Nice people are quadruplex. The olympia does not need the olympia.", "logic": "\nPeaceable(olympia)\nQuadruplex(olympia)\nVapourish(olympia)\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> Vapourish(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) -> Vapourish(x))\nforall x (Peaceable(x) and Cordiform(x) -> Vapourish(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) -> Vapourish(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) and Minimum(x) -> Vapourish(x))\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> not Minimum(x))\nforall x (Vapourish(x) and Quadruplex(x) -> Cordiform(x))\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\n\nnot Needs(olympia, olympia)\n\nnot Needs(olympia, olympia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The marit is buoyant. The marit is regimental. The marit is recyclable. If someone is inerrable then they are recyclable. Red people are recyclable. Cold, inerrable people are recyclable. Red people are recyclable. Red, childly people are recyclable. Nice people are not childly. All recyclable, regimental people are inerrable. Nice people are regimental. The marit likes the marit.", "logic": "\nBuoyant(marit)\nRegimental(marit)\nRecyclable(marit)\nforall x (Inerrable(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Buoyant(x) and Inerrable(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) and Childly(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Inerrable(x) -> not Childly(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) and Regimental(x) -> Inerrable(x))\nforall x (Inerrable(x) -> Regimental(x))\n\nLikes(marit, marit)\n\nLikes(marit, marit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The alanna mismatch the waleed. The alanna is rasping. The alanna crawfish the waleed. The alanna yarn the manny. The alanna does not see the waleed. The manny mismatch the waleed. The manny yarn the alanna. The manny yarn the waleed. The waleed mismatch the alanna. The waleed mismatch the manny. The waleed is phobic. The waleed is unstilted. The waleed crawfish the alanna. The waleed crawfish the manny. The waleed yarn the manny. If the alanna does not need the manny then the alanna yarn the waleed. If the manny crawfish the alanna and the alanna yarn the waleed then the waleed is not andorran. If the alanna is phobic then the alanna does not eat the manny. If someone crawfish the alanna then the alanna is phobic. If the waleed is unstilted then the waleed yarn the manny. If the alanna yarn the waleed then the waleed does not eat the manny. The manny yarn the alanna.", "logic": "\nMismatch(alanna, waleed)\nRasping(alanna)\nCrawfish(alanna, waleed)\nYarn(alanna, manny)\nnot Yarn(alanna, waleed)\nMismatch(manny, waleed)\nYarn(manny, alanna)\nYarn(manny, waleed)\nMismatch(waleed, alanna)\nMismatch(waleed, manny)\nPhobic(waleed)\nUnstilted(waleed)\nCrawfish(waleed, alanna)\nCrawfish(waleed, manny)\nYarn(waleed, manny)\nnot Crawfish(alanna, manny) -> Yarn(alanna, waleed)\nCrawfish(manny, alanna) and Yarn(alanna, waleed) -> not Andorran(waleed)\nPhobic(alanna) -> not Mismatch(alanna, manny)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, alanna) -> Phobic(alanna))\nUnstilted(waleed) -> Yarn(waleed, manny)\nYarn(alanna, waleed) -> not Mismatch(waleed, manny)\n\nYarn(manny, alanna)\n\ntherefore Yarn(manny, alanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The vickie blazon the herta. The vickie is mustached. The vickie nark the herta. The vickie code the rudie. The vickie does not see the herta. The rudie blazon the herta. The rudie code the vickie. The rudie code the herta. The herta blazon the vickie. The herta blazon the rudie. The herta is port. The herta is mensurable. The herta nark the vickie. The herta nark the rudie. The herta code the rudie. If the vickie does not need the rudie then the vickie code the herta. If the rudie nark the vickie and the vickie code the herta then the herta is not piano. If the vickie is port then the vickie does not eat the rudie. If someone nark the vickie then the vickie is port. If the herta is mensurable then the herta code the rudie. If the vickie code the herta then the herta does not eat the rudie. The herta does not eat the rudie.", "logic": "\nBlazon(vickie, herta)\nMustached(vickie)\nNark(vickie, herta)\nCode(vickie, rudie)\nnot Code(vickie, herta)\nBlazon(rudie, herta)\nCode(rudie, vickie)\nCode(rudie, herta)\nBlazon(herta, vickie)\nBlazon(herta, rudie)\nPort(herta)\nMensurable(herta)\nNark(herta, vickie)\nNark(herta, rudie)\nCode(herta, rudie)\nnot Nark(vickie, rudie) -> Code(vickie, herta)\nNark(rudie, vickie) and Code(vickie, herta) -> not Piano(herta)\nPort(vickie) -> not Blazon(vickie, rudie)\nforall x (Nark(x, vickie) -> Port(vickie))\nMensurable(herta) -> Code(herta, rudie)\nCode(vickie, herta) -> not Blazon(herta, rudie)\n\nnot Blazon(herta, rudie)\n\ntherefore Blazon(herta, rudie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The josh constipate the fina. The josh is aperient. The josh doze the fina. The josh belabor the gratia. The josh does not see the fina. The gratia constipate the fina. The gratia belabor the josh. The gratia belabor the fina. The fina constipate the josh. The fina constipate the gratia. The fina is lossy. The fina is utilizable. The fina doze the josh. The fina doze the gratia. The fina belabor the gratia. If the josh does not need the gratia then the josh belabor the fina. If the gratia doze the josh and the josh belabor the fina then the fina is not asthenic. If the josh is lossy then the josh does not eat the gratia. If someone doze the josh then the josh is lossy. If the fina is utilizable then the fina belabor the gratia. If the josh belabor the fina then the fina does not eat the gratia. The josh is lossy.", "logic": "\nConstipate(josh, fina)\nAperient(josh)\nDoze(josh, fina)\nBelabor(josh, gratia)\nnot Belabor(josh, fina)\nConstipate(gratia, fina)\nBelabor(gratia, josh)\nBelabor(gratia, fina)\nConstipate(fina, josh)\nConstipate(fina, gratia)\nLossy(fina)\nUtilizable(fina)\nDoze(fina, josh)\nDoze(fina, gratia)\nBelabor(fina, gratia)\nnot Doze(josh, gratia) -> Belabor(josh, fina)\nDoze(gratia, josh) and Belabor(josh, fina) -> not Asthenic(fina)\nLossy(josh) -> not Constipate(josh, gratia)\nforall x (Doze(x, josh) -> Lossy(josh))\nUtilizable(fina) -> Belabor(fina, gratia)\nBelabor(josh, fina) -> not Constipate(fina, gratia)\n\nLossy(josh)\n\nDoze(fina, josh) and forall x (Doze(x, josh) -> Lossy(josh)) -> therefore Lossy(josh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The dulcy vomit the leola. The dulcy is pulmonic. The dulcy plume the leola. The dulcy face the gay. The dulcy does not see the leola. The gay vomit the leola. The gay face the dulcy. The gay face the leola. The leola vomit the dulcy. The leola vomit the gay. The leola is financial. The leola is bacchanal. The leola plume the dulcy. The leola plume the gay. The leola face the gay. If the dulcy does not need the gay then the dulcy face the leola. If the gay plume the dulcy and the dulcy face the leola then the leola is not unwashed. If the dulcy is financial then the dulcy does not eat the gay. If someone plume the dulcy then the dulcy is financial. If the leola is bacchanal then the leola face the gay. If the dulcy face the leola then the leola does not eat the gay. The dulcy is not financial.", "logic": "\nVomit(dulcy, leola)\nPulmonic(dulcy)\nPlume(dulcy, leola)\nFace(dulcy, gay)\nnot Face(dulcy, leola)\nVomit(gay, leola)\nFace(gay, dulcy)\nFace(gay, leola)\nVomit(leola, dulcy)\nVomit(leola, gay)\nFinancial(leola)\nBacchanal(leola)\nPlume(leola, dulcy)\nPlume(leola, gay)\nFace(leola, gay)\nnot Plume(dulcy, gay) -> Face(dulcy, leola)\nPlume(gay, dulcy) and Face(dulcy, leola) -> not Unwashed(leola)\nFinancial(dulcy) -> not Vomit(dulcy, gay)\nforall x (Plume(x, dulcy) -> Financial(dulcy))\nBacchanal(leola) -> Face(leola, gay)\nFace(dulcy, leola) -> not Vomit(leola, gay)\n\nnot Financial(dulcy)\n\nPlume(leola, dulcy) and forall x (Plume(x, dulcy) -> Financial(dulcy)) -> therefore Financial(dulcy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The leelah deny the cary. The leelah is palpatory. The leelah compact the cary. The leelah stall the alysia. The leelah does not see the cary. The alysia deny the cary. The alysia stall the leelah. The alysia stall the cary. The cary deny the leelah. The cary deny the alysia. The cary is jangly. The cary is infertile. The cary compact the leelah. The cary compact the alysia. The cary stall the alysia. If the leelah does not need the alysia then the leelah stall the cary. If the alysia compact the leelah and the leelah stall the cary then the cary is not endogenic. If the leelah is jangly then the leelah does not eat the alysia. If someone compact the leelah then the leelah is jangly. If the cary is infertile then the cary stall the alysia. If the leelah stall the cary then the cary does not eat the alysia. The leelah does not eat the alysia.", "logic": "\nDeny(leelah, cary)\nPalpatory(leelah)\nCompact(leelah, cary)\nStall(leelah, alysia)\nnot Stall(leelah, cary)\nDeny(alysia, cary)\nStall(alysia, leelah)\nStall(alysia, cary)\nDeny(cary, leelah)\nDeny(cary, alysia)\nJangly(cary)\nInfertile(cary)\nCompact(cary, leelah)\nCompact(cary, alysia)\nStall(cary, alysia)\nnot Compact(leelah, alysia) -> Stall(leelah, cary)\nCompact(alysia, leelah) and Stall(leelah, cary) -> not Endogenic(cary)\nJangly(leelah) -> not Deny(leelah, alysia)\nforall x (Compact(x, leelah) -> Jangly(leelah))\nInfertile(cary) -> Stall(cary, alysia)\nStall(leelah, cary) -> not Deny(cary, alysia)\n\nnot Deny(leelah, alysia)\n\nCompact(cary, leelah) and forall x (Compact(x, leelah) -> Jangly(leelah)) -> therefore Jangly(leelah) Jangly(leelah) and Jangly(leelah) -> not Deny(leelah, alysia) -> therefore not Deny(leelah, alysia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The katharine colonise the milzie. The katharine is swarthy. The katharine sexualize the milzie. The katharine shuttle the korella. The katharine does not see the milzie. The korella colonise the milzie. The korella shuttle the katharine. The korella shuttle the milzie. The milzie colonise the katharine. The milzie colonise the korella. The milzie is sceptical. The milzie is depraved. The milzie sexualize the katharine. The milzie sexualize the korella. The milzie shuttle the korella. If the katharine does not need the korella then the katharine shuttle the milzie. If the korella sexualize the katharine and the katharine shuttle the milzie then the milzie is not supersonic. If the katharine is sceptical then the katharine does not eat the korella. If someone sexualize the katharine then the katharine is sceptical. If the milzie is depraved then the milzie shuttle the korella. If the katharine shuttle the milzie then the milzie does not eat the korella. The katharine colonise the korella.", "logic": "\nColonise(katharine, milzie)\nSwarthy(katharine)\nSexualize(katharine, milzie)\nShuttle(katharine, korella)\nnot Shuttle(katharine, milzie)\nColonise(korella, milzie)\nShuttle(korella, katharine)\nShuttle(korella, milzie)\nColonise(milzie, katharine)\nColonise(milzie, korella)\nSceptical(milzie)\nDepraved(milzie)\nSexualize(milzie, katharine)\nSexualize(milzie, korella)\nShuttle(milzie, korella)\nnot Sexualize(katharine, korella) -> Shuttle(katharine, milzie)\nSexualize(korella, katharine) and Shuttle(katharine, milzie) -> not Supersonic(milzie)\nSceptical(katharine) -> not Colonise(katharine, korella)\nforall x (Sexualize(x, katharine) -> Sceptical(katharine))\nDepraved(milzie) -> Shuttle(milzie, korella)\nShuttle(katharine, milzie) -> not Colonise(milzie, korella)\n\nColonise(katharine, korella)\n\nSexualize(milzie, katharine) and forall x (Sexualize(x, katharine) -> Sceptical(katharine)) -> therefore Sceptical(katharine) Sceptical(katharine) and Sceptical(katharine) -> not Colonise(katharine, korella) -> therefore not Colonise(katharine, korella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The julie devitalise the dwight. The julie is effete. The julie daydream the dwight. The julie crest the robina. The julie does not see the dwight. The robina devitalise the dwight. The robina crest the julie. The robina crest the dwight. The dwight devitalise the julie. The dwight devitalise the robina. The dwight is infectious. The dwight is reticent. The dwight daydream the julie. The dwight daydream the robina. The dwight crest the robina. If the julie does not need the robina then the julie crest the dwight. If the robina daydream the julie and the julie crest the dwight then the dwight is not sonant. If the julie is infectious then the julie does not eat the robina. If someone daydream the julie then the julie is infectious. If the dwight is reticent then the dwight crest the robina. If the julie crest the dwight then the dwight does not eat the robina. The robina does not need the julie.", "logic": "\nDevitalise(julie, dwight)\nEffete(julie)\nDaydream(julie, dwight)\nCrest(julie, robina)\nnot Crest(julie, dwight)\nDevitalise(robina, dwight)\nCrest(robina, julie)\nCrest(robina, dwight)\nDevitalise(dwight, julie)\nDevitalise(dwight, robina)\nInfectious(dwight)\nReticent(dwight)\nDaydream(dwight, julie)\nDaydream(dwight, robina)\nCrest(dwight, robina)\nnot Daydream(julie, robina) -> Crest(julie, dwight)\nDaydream(robina, julie) and Crest(julie, dwight) -> not Sonant(dwight)\nInfectious(julie) -> not Devitalise(julie, robina)\nforall x (Daydream(x, julie) -> Infectious(julie))\nReticent(dwight) -> Crest(dwight, robina)\nCrest(julie, dwight) -> not Devitalise(dwight, robina)\n\nnot Daydream(robina, julie)\n\nnot Daydream(robina, julie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The casey garrotte the thomas. The casey is cumbersome. The casey nurse the thomas. The casey powderize the schuyler. The casey does not see the thomas. The schuyler garrotte the thomas. The schuyler powderize the casey. The schuyler powderize the thomas. The thomas garrotte the casey. The thomas garrotte the schuyler. The thomas is euphoriant. The thomas is bouldered. The thomas nurse the casey. The thomas nurse the schuyler. The thomas powderize the schuyler. If the casey does not need the schuyler then the casey powderize the thomas. If the schuyler nurse the casey and the casey powderize the thomas then the thomas is not able. If the casey is euphoriant then the casey does not eat the schuyler. If someone nurse the casey then the casey is euphoriant. If the thomas is bouldered then the thomas powderize the schuyler. If the casey powderize the thomas then the thomas does not eat the schuyler. The casey powderize the casey.", "logic": "\nGarrotte(casey, thomas)\nCumbersome(casey)\nNurse(casey, thomas)\nPowderize(casey, schuyler)\nnot Powderize(casey, thomas)\nGarrotte(schuyler, thomas)\nPowderize(schuyler, casey)\nPowderize(schuyler, thomas)\nGarrotte(thomas, casey)\nGarrotte(thomas, schuyler)\nEuphoriant(thomas)\nBouldered(thomas)\nNurse(thomas, casey)\nNurse(thomas, schuyler)\nPowderize(thomas, schuyler)\nnot Nurse(casey, schuyler) -> Powderize(casey, thomas)\nNurse(schuyler, casey) and Powderize(casey, thomas) -> not Able(thomas)\nEuphoriant(casey) -> not Garrotte(casey, schuyler)\nforall x (Nurse(x, casey) -> Euphoriant(casey))\nBouldered(thomas) -> Powderize(thomas, schuyler)\nPowderize(casey, thomas) -> not Garrotte(thomas, schuyler)\n\nPowderize(casey, casey)\n\nPowderize(casey, casey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The doralynn dally the thaddus. The doralynn is roving. The doralynn inaugurate the thaddus. The doralynn casket the manon. The doralynn does not see the thaddus. The manon dally the thaddus. The manon casket the doralynn. The manon casket the thaddus. The thaddus dally the doralynn. The thaddus dally the manon. The thaddus is advective. The thaddus is eritrean. The thaddus inaugurate the doralynn. The thaddus inaugurate the manon. The thaddus casket the manon. If the doralynn does not need the manon then the doralynn casket the thaddus. If the manon inaugurate the doralynn and the doralynn casket the thaddus then the thaddus is not gummed. If the doralynn is advective then the doralynn does not eat the manon. If someone inaugurate the doralynn then the doralynn is advective. If the thaddus is eritrean then the thaddus casket the manon. If the doralynn casket the thaddus then the thaddus does not eat the manon. The manon is not roving.", "logic": "\nDally(doralynn, thaddus)\nRoving(doralynn)\nInaugurate(doralynn, thaddus)\nCasket(doralynn, manon)\nnot Casket(doralynn, thaddus)\nDally(manon, thaddus)\nCasket(manon, doralynn)\nCasket(manon, thaddus)\nDally(thaddus, doralynn)\nDally(thaddus, manon)\nAdvective(thaddus)\nEritrean(thaddus)\nInaugurate(thaddus, doralynn)\nInaugurate(thaddus, manon)\nCasket(thaddus, manon)\nnot Inaugurate(doralynn, manon) -> Casket(doralynn, thaddus)\nInaugurate(manon, doralynn) and Casket(doralynn, thaddus) -> not Gummed(thaddus)\nAdvective(doralynn) -> not Dally(doralynn, manon)\nforall x (Inaugurate(x, doralynn) -> Advective(doralynn))\nEritrean(thaddus) -> Casket(thaddus, manon)\nCasket(doralynn, thaddus) -> not Dally(thaddus, manon)\n\nnot Roving(manon)\n\nnot Roving(manon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The allyson muddy the jef. The allyson is shared. The allyson admonish the jef. The allyson randomise the ileana. The allyson does not see the jef. The ileana muddy the jef. The ileana randomise the allyson. The ileana randomise the jef. The jef muddy the allyson. The jef muddy the ileana. The jef is rewardful. The jef is insolvable. The jef admonish the allyson. The jef admonish the ileana. The jef randomise the ileana. If the allyson does not need the ileana then the allyson randomise the jef. If the ileana admonish the allyson and the allyson randomise the jef then the jef is not unholy. If the allyson is rewardful then the allyson does not eat the ileana. If someone admonish the allyson then the allyson is rewardful. If the jef is insolvable then the jef randomise the ileana. If the allyson randomise the jef then the jef does not eat the ileana. The allyson admonish the ileana.", "logic": "\nMuddy(allyson, jef)\nShared(allyson)\nAdmonish(allyson, jef)\nRandomise(allyson, ileana)\nnot Randomise(allyson, jef)\nMuddy(ileana, jef)\nRandomise(ileana, allyson)\nRandomise(ileana, jef)\nMuddy(jef, allyson)\nMuddy(jef, ileana)\nRewardful(jef)\nInsolvable(jef)\nAdmonish(jef, allyson)\nAdmonish(jef, ileana)\nRandomise(jef, ileana)\nnot Admonish(allyson, ileana) -> Randomise(allyson, jef)\nAdmonish(ileana, allyson) and Randomise(allyson, jef) -> not Unholy(jef)\nRewardful(allyson) -> not Muddy(allyson, ileana)\nforall x (Admonish(x, allyson) -> Rewardful(allyson))\nInsolvable(jef) -> Randomise(jef, ileana)\nRandomise(allyson, jef) -> not Muddy(jef, ileana)\n\nAdmonish(allyson, ileana)\n\nAdmonish(allyson, ileana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The talbert inhabit the pen. The talbert is linguistic. The talbert liberalize the pen. The talbert prise the prasad. The talbert does not see the pen. The prasad inhabit the pen. The prasad prise the talbert. The prasad prise the pen. The pen inhabit the talbert. The pen inhabit the prasad. The pen is genital. The pen is salacious. The pen liberalize the talbert. The pen liberalize the prasad. The pen prise the prasad. If the talbert does not need the prasad then the talbert prise the pen. If the prasad liberalize the talbert and the talbert prise the pen then the pen is not bodied. If the talbert is genital then the talbert does not eat the prasad. If someone liberalize the talbert then the talbert is genital. If the pen is salacious then the pen prise the prasad. If the talbert prise the pen then the pen does not eat the prasad. The prasad does not eat the prasad.", "logic": "\nInhabit(talbert, pen)\nLinguistic(talbert)\nLiberalize(talbert, pen)\nPrise(talbert, prasad)\nnot Prise(talbert, pen)\nInhabit(prasad, pen)\nPrise(prasad, talbert)\nPrise(prasad, pen)\nInhabit(pen, talbert)\nInhabit(pen, prasad)\nGenital(pen)\nSalacious(pen)\nLiberalize(pen, talbert)\nLiberalize(pen, prasad)\nPrise(pen, prasad)\nnot Liberalize(talbert, prasad) -> Prise(talbert, pen)\nLiberalize(prasad, talbert) and Prise(talbert, pen) -> not Bodied(pen)\nGenital(talbert) -> not Inhabit(talbert, prasad)\nforall x (Liberalize(x, talbert) -> Genital(talbert))\nSalacious(pen) -> Prise(pen, prasad)\nPrise(talbert, pen) -> not Inhabit(pen, prasad)\n\nnot Inhabit(prasad, prasad)\n\nnot Inhabit(prasad, prasad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "The barty prompt the martyn. The barty is anguine. The barty demystify the martyn. The barty eternalize the geri. The barty does not see the martyn. The geri prompt the martyn. The geri eternalize the barty. The geri eternalize the martyn. The martyn prompt the barty. The martyn prompt the geri. The martyn is freehanded. The martyn is bodily. The martyn demystify the barty. The martyn demystify the geri. The martyn eternalize the geri. If the barty does not need the geri then the barty eternalize the martyn. If the geri demystify the barty and the barty eternalize the martyn then the martyn is not malodorous. If the barty is freehanded then the barty does not eat the geri. If someone demystify the barty then the barty is freehanded. If the martyn is bodily then the martyn eternalize the geri. If the barty eternalize the martyn then the martyn does not eat the geri. The martyn eternalize the barty.", "logic": "\nPrompt(barty, martyn)\nAnguine(barty)\nDemystify(barty, martyn)\nEternalize(barty, geri)\nnot Eternalize(barty, martyn)\nPrompt(geri, martyn)\nEternalize(geri, barty)\nEternalize(geri, martyn)\nPrompt(martyn, barty)\nPrompt(martyn, geri)\nFreehanded(martyn)\nBodily(martyn)\nDemystify(martyn, barty)\nDemystify(martyn, geri)\nEternalize(martyn, geri)\nnot Demystify(barty, geri) -> Eternalize(barty, martyn)\nDemystify(geri, barty) and Eternalize(barty, martyn) -> not Malodorous(martyn)\nFreehanded(barty) -> not Prompt(barty, geri)\nforall x (Demystify(x, barty) -> Freehanded(barty))\nBodily(martyn) -> Eternalize(martyn, geri)\nEternalize(barty, martyn) -> not Prompt(martyn, geri)\n\nEternalize(martyn, barty)\n\nEternalize(martyn, barty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-387"} {"premises": "Chanda is not euphoriant. Chanda is caffeinic. Hagan is eudaemonic. Hagan is handless. Hagan is euphoriant. Hagan is caffeinic. Hagan is risky. If Chanda is not euphoriant then Chanda is not risky. Green, risky things are caffeinic. If something is euphoriant and not matey then it is not risky. If something is caffeinic and not risky then it is eudaemonic. If something is sunny and not matey then it is eudaemonic. If something is matey then it is eudaemonic. Hagan is euphoriant.", "logic": "\nnot Euphoriant(chanda)\nCaffeinic(chanda)\nEudaemonic(hagan)\nHandless(hagan)\nEuphoriant(hagan)\nCaffeinic(hagan)\nRisky(hagan)\nnot Euphoriant(chanda) -> not Risky(chanda)\nforall x (Sunny(x) and Risky(x) -> Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) and not Matey(x) -> not Risky(x))\nforall x (Caffeinic(x) and not Risky(x) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nforall x (Sunny(x) and not Matey(x) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nforall x (Matey(x) -> Eudaemonic(x))\n\nEuphoriant(hagan)\n\ntherefore Euphoriant(hagan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Shaughn is not pinnatifid. Shaughn is known. Rosalie is unalike. Rosalie is derogatory. Rosalie is pinnatifid. Rosalie is known. Rosalie is mechanised. If Shaughn is not pinnatifid then Shaughn is not mechanised. Green, mechanised things are known. If something is pinnatifid and not antiviral then it is not mechanised. If something is known and not mechanised then it is unalike. If something is numidian and not antiviral then it is unalike. If something is antiviral then it is unalike. Shaughn is pinnatifid.", "logic": "\nnot Pinnatifid(shaughn)\nKnown(shaughn)\nUnalike(rosalie)\nDerogatory(rosalie)\nPinnatifid(rosalie)\nKnown(rosalie)\nMechanised(rosalie)\nnot Pinnatifid(shaughn) -> not Mechanised(shaughn)\nforall x (Numidian(x) and Mechanised(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Pinnatifid(x) and not Antiviral(x) -> not Mechanised(x))\nforall x (Known(x) and not Mechanised(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Numidian(x) and not Antiviral(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Antiviral(x) -> Unalike(x))\n\nPinnatifid(shaughn)\n\ntherefore not Pinnatifid(shaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Grover is not unblushing. Grover is outmost. Dyane is subclavian. Dyane is plaguey. Dyane is unblushing. Dyane is outmost. Dyane is unrigged. If Grover is not unblushing then Grover is not unrigged. Green, unrigged things are outmost. If something is unblushing and not enwrapped then it is not unrigged. If something is outmost and not unrigged then it is subclavian. If something is interior and not enwrapped then it is subclavian. If something is enwrapped then it is subclavian. Grover is not unrigged.", "logic": "\nnot Unblushing(grover)\nOutmost(grover)\nSubclavian(dyane)\nPlaguey(dyane)\nUnblushing(dyane)\nOutmost(dyane)\nUnrigged(dyane)\nnot Unblushing(grover) -> not Unrigged(grover)\nforall x (Interior(x) and Unrigged(x) -> Outmost(x))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and not Enwrapped(x) -> not Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Outmost(x) and not Unrigged(x) -> Subclavian(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and not Enwrapped(x) -> Subclavian(x))\nforall x (Enwrapped(x) -> Subclavian(x))\n\nnot Unrigged(grover)\n\nnot Unblushing(grover) and not Unblushing(grover) -> not Unrigged(grover) -> therefore not Unrigged(grover)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Carmon is not atrophied. Carmon is size. Rufe is undeserved. Rufe is immemorial. Rufe is atrophied. Rufe is size. Rufe is binomial. If Carmon is not atrophied then Carmon is not binomial. Green, binomial things are size. If something is atrophied and not bouldery then it is not binomial. If something is size and not binomial then it is undeserved. If something is downstair and not bouldery then it is undeserved. If something is bouldery then it is undeserved. Carmon is binomial.", "logic": "\nnot Atrophied(carmon)\nSize(carmon)\nUndeserved(rufe)\nImmemorial(rufe)\nAtrophied(rufe)\nSize(rufe)\nBinomial(rufe)\nnot Atrophied(carmon) -> not Binomial(carmon)\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Binomial(x) -> Size(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and not Bouldery(x) -> not Binomial(x))\nforall x (Size(x) and not Binomial(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and not Bouldery(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Bouldery(x) -> Undeserved(x))\n\nBinomial(carmon)\n\nnot Atrophied(carmon) and not Atrophied(carmon) -> not Binomial(carmon) -> therefore not Binomial(carmon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Cammie is not guileless. Cammie is trim. Colly is conscious. Colly is mineral. Colly is guileless. Colly is trim. Colly is suppliant. If Cammie is not guileless then Cammie is not suppliant. Green, suppliant things are trim. If something is guileless and not raisable then it is not suppliant. If something is trim and not suppliant then it is conscious. If something is botswanan and not raisable then it is conscious. If something is raisable then it is conscious. Cammie is conscious.", "logic": "\nnot Guileless(cammie)\nTrim(cammie)\nConscious(colly)\nMineral(colly)\nGuileless(colly)\nTrim(colly)\nSuppliant(colly)\nnot Guileless(cammie) -> not Suppliant(cammie)\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Suppliant(x) -> Trim(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) and not Raisable(x) -> not Suppliant(x))\nforall x (Trim(x) and not Suppliant(x) -> Conscious(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and not Raisable(x) -> Conscious(x))\nforall x (Raisable(x) -> Conscious(x))\n\nConscious(cammie)\n\nnot Guileless(cammie) and not Guileless(cammie) -> not Suppliant(cammie) -> therefore not Suppliant(cammie) Trim(cammie) and not Suppliant(cammie) and forall x (Trim(x) and not Suppliant(x) -> Conscious(x)) -> therefore Conscious(cammie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Lucita is not miotic. Lucita is encased. Dino is statutory. Dino is fossorial. Dino is miotic. Dino is encased. Dino is ionic. If Lucita is not miotic then Lucita is not ionic. Green, ionic things are encased. If something is miotic and not oblate then it is not ionic. If something is encased and not ionic then it is statutory. If something is equipotent and not oblate then it is statutory. If something is oblate then it is statutory. Lucita is not statutory.", "logic": "\nnot Miotic(lucita)\nEncased(lucita)\nStatutory(dino)\nFossorial(dino)\nMiotic(dino)\nEncased(dino)\nIonic(dino)\nnot Miotic(lucita) -> not Ionic(lucita)\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Ionic(x) -> Encased(x))\nforall x (Miotic(x) and not Oblate(x) -> not Ionic(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) and not Ionic(x) -> Statutory(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and not Oblate(x) -> Statutory(x))\nforall x (Oblate(x) -> Statutory(x))\n\nnot Statutory(lucita)\n\nnot Miotic(lucita) and not Miotic(lucita) -> not Ionic(lucita) -> therefore not Ionic(lucita) Encased(lucita) and not Ionic(lucita) and forall x (Encased(x) and not Ionic(x) -> Statutory(x)) -> therefore Statutory(lucita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Gertrud is not operating. Gertrud is neonatal. Ana is laputan. Ana is boeotian. Ana is operating. Ana is neonatal. Ana is uncolored. If Gertrud is not operating then Gertrud is not uncolored. Green, uncolored things are neonatal. If something is operating and not vapourised then it is not uncolored. If something is neonatal and not uncolored then it is laputan. If something is cloddish and not vapourised then it is laputan. If something is vapourised then it is laputan. Gertrud is not vapourised.", "logic": "\nnot Operating(gertrud)\nNeonatal(gertrud)\nLaputan(ana)\nBoeotian(ana)\nOperating(ana)\nNeonatal(ana)\nUncolored(ana)\nnot Operating(gertrud) -> not Uncolored(gertrud)\nforall x (Cloddish(x) and Uncolored(x) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Operating(x) and not Vapourised(x) -> not Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) and not Uncolored(x) -> Laputan(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) and not Vapourised(x) -> Laputan(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Laputan(x))\n\nnot Vapourised(gertrud)\n\nnot Vapourised(gertrud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Alexine is not torrid. Alexine is ictal. Darcee is envisioned. Darcee is ulcerative. Darcee is torrid. Darcee is ictal. Darcee is sunbaked. If Alexine is not torrid then Alexine is not sunbaked. Green, sunbaked things are ictal. If something is torrid and not romansh then it is not sunbaked. If something is ictal and not sunbaked then it is envisioned. If something is agonadal and not romansh then it is envisioned. If something is romansh then it is envisioned. Darcee is romansh.", "logic": "\nnot Torrid(alexine)\nIctal(alexine)\nEnvisioned(darcee)\nUlcerative(darcee)\nTorrid(darcee)\nIctal(darcee)\nSunbaked(darcee)\nnot Torrid(alexine) -> not Sunbaked(alexine)\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and Sunbaked(x) -> Ictal(x))\nforall x (Torrid(x) and not Romansh(x) -> not Sunbaked(x))\nforall x (Ictal(x) and not Sunbaked(x) -> Envisioned(x))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and not Romansh(x) -> Envisioned(x))\nforall x (Romansh(x) -> Envisioned(x))\n\nRomansh(darcee)\n\nRomansh(darcee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Dottie is not leggy. Dottie is snaky. Bernita is airy. Bernita is bicipital. Bernita is leggy. Bernita is snaky. Bernita is affiliated. If Dottie is not leggy then Dottie is not affiliated. Green, affiliated things are snaky. If something is leggy and not graven then it is not affiliated. If something is snaky and not affiliated then it is airy. If something is flaky and not graven then it is airy. If something is graven then it is airy. Bernita is not flaky.", "logic": "\nnot Leggy(dottie)\nSnaky(dottie)\nAiry(bernita)\nBicipital(bernita)\nLeggy(bernita)\nSnaky(bernita)\nAffiliated(bernita)\nnot Leggy(dottie) -> not Affiliated(dottie)\nforall x (Flaky(x) and Affiliated(x) -> Snaky(x))\nforall x (Leggy(x) and not Graven(x) -> not Affiliated(x))\nforall x (Snaky(x) and not Affiliated(x) -> Airy(x))\nforall x (Flaky(x) and not Graven(x) -> Airy(x))\nforall x (Graven(x) -> Airy(x))\n\nnot Flaky(bernita)\n\nnot Flaky(bernita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Felipe is not frizzy. Felipe is controlled. Somerset is unsmiling. Somerset is caecilian. Somerset is frizzy. Somerset is controlled. Somerset is weird. If Felipe is not frizzy then Felipe is not weird. Green, weird things are controlled. If something is frizzy and not ostensible then it is not weird. If something is controlled and not weird then it is unsmiling. If something is xlvii and not ostensible then it is unsmiling. If something is ostensible then it is unsmiling. Felipe is xlvii.", "logic": "\nnot Frizzy(felipe)\nControlled(felipe)\nUnsmiling(somerset)\nCaecilian(somerset)\nFrizzy(somerset)\nControlled(somerset)\nWeird(somerset)\nnot Frizzy(felipe) -> not Weird(felipe)\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and Weird(x) -> Controlled(x))\nforall x (Frizzy(x) and not Ostensible(x) -> not Weird(x))\nforall x (Controlled(x) and not Weird(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and not Ostensible(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Ostensible(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\n\nXlvii(felipe)\n\nXlvii(felipe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1402"} {"premises": "Jermain is totaled. Tadd is keyed. Tadd is leathery. Keil is impartial. Keil is shortened. Keil is sane. Ilka is sane. If Jermain is inane then Jermain is keyed. All shortened things are inane. If something is shortened and inane then it is totaled. If something is sane and totaled then it is impartial. If something is inane then it is totaled. If Keil is impartial and Keil is shortened then Keil is keyed. Keil is sane.", "logic": "\nTotaled(jermain)\nKeyed(tadd)\nLeathery(tadd)\nImpartial(keil)\nShortened(keil)\nSane(keil)\nSane(ilka)\nInane(jermain) -> Keyed(jermain)\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Inane(x))\nforall x (Shortened(x) and Inane(x) -> Totaled(x))\nforall x (Sane(x) and Totaled(x) -> Impartial(x))\nforall x (Inane(x) -> Totaled(x))\nImpartial(keil) and Shortened(keil) -> Keyed(keil)\n\nSane(keil)\n\ntherefore Sane(keil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Nero is euphonious. Maynard is personal. Maynard is automatic. Benjamin is severable. Benjamin is sallow. Benjamin is prostate. Sybyl is prostate. If Nero is anemic then Nero is personal. All sallow things are anemic. If something is sallow and anemic then it is euphonious. If something is prostate and euphonious then it is severable. If something is anemic then it is euphonious. If Benjamin is severable and Benjamin is sallow then Benjamin is personal. Nero is not euphonious.", "logic": "\nEuphonious(nero)\nPersonal(maynard)\nAutomatic(maynard)\nSeverable(benjamin)\nSallow(benjamin)\nProstate(benjamin)\nProstate(sybyl)\nAnemic(nero) -> Personal(nero)\nforall x (Sallow(x) -> Anemic(x))\nforall x (Sallow(x) and Anemic(x) -> Euphonious(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) and Euphonious(x) -> Severable(x))\nforall x (Anemic(x) -> Euphonious(x))\nSeverable(benjamin) and Sallow(benjamin) -> Personal(benjamin)\n\nnot Euphonious(nero)\n\ntherefore Euphonious(nero)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Lyle is peruked. Rockwell is zymoid. Rockwell is mesonic. Garry is nonlethal. Garry is undutiful. Garry is wizen. Amelia is wizen. If Lyle is boundless then Lyle is zymoid. All undutiful things are boundless. If something is undutiful and boundless then it is peruked. If something is wizen and peruked then it is nonlethal. If something is boundless then it is peruked. If Garry is nonlethal and Garry is undutiful then Garry is zymoid. Garry is zymoid.", "logic": "\nPeruked(lyle)\nZymoid(rockwell)\nMesonic(rockwell)\nNonlethal(garry)\nUndutiful(garry)\nWizen(garry)\nWizen(amelia)\nBoundless(lyle) -> Zymoid(lyle)\nforall x (Undutiful(x) -> Boundless(x))\nforall x (Undutiful(x) and Boundless(x) -> Peruked(x))\nforall x (Wizen(x) and Peruked(x) -> Nonlethal(x))\nforall x (Boundless(x) -> Peruked(x))\nNonlethal(garry) and Undutiful(garry) -> Zymoid(garry)\n\nZymoid(garry)\n\nNonlethal(garry) and Undutiful(garry) and Nonlethal(garry) and Undutiful(garry) -> Zymoid(garry) -> therefore Zymoid(garry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Haskel is faddish. Shanda is cardinal. Shanda is yielding. Blaine is dominical. Blaine is briny. Blaine is licentious. Giovanna is licentious. If Haskel is diaphanous then Haskel is cardinal. All briny things are diaphanous. If something is briny and diaphanous then it is faddish. If something is licentious and faddish then it is dominical. If something is diaphanous then it is faddish. If Blaine is dominical and Blaine is briny then Blaine is cardinal. Blaine is not diaphanous.", "logic": "\nFaddish(haskel)\nCardinal(shanda)\nYielding(shanda)\nDominical(blaine)\nBriny(blaine)\nLicentious(blaine)\nLicentious(giovanna)\nDiaphanous(haskel) -> Cardinal(haskel)\nforall x (Briny(x) -> Diaphanous(x))\nforall x (Briny(x) and Diaphanous(x) -> Faddish(x))\nforall x (Licentious(x) and Faddish(x) -> Dominical(x))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) -> Faddish(x))\nDominical(blaine) and Briny(blaine) -> Cardinal(blaine)\n\nnot Diaphanous(blaine)\n\nBriny(blaine) and forall x (Briny(x) -> Diaphanous(x)) -> therefore Diaphanous(blaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Ceciley is cervical. Blisse is arcadian. Blisse is ectodermal. Amandy is armillary. Amandy is bilious. Amandy is cottony. Melitta is cottony. If Ceciley is trillion then Ceciley is arcadian. All bilious things are trillion. If something is bilious and trillion then it is cervical. If something is cottony and cervical then it is armillary. If something is trillion then it is cervical. If Amandy is armillary and Amandy is bilious then Amandy is arcadian. Amandy is cervical.", "logic": "\nCervical(ceciley)\nArcadian(blisse)\nEctodermal(blisse)\nArmillary(amandy)\nBilious(amandy)\nCottony(amandy)\nCottony(melitta)\nTrillion(ceciley) -> Arcadian(ceciley)\nforall x (Bilious(x) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Bilious(x) and Trillion(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Cottony(x) and Cervical(x) -> Armillary(x))\nforall x (Trillion(x) -> Cervical(x))\nArmillary(amandy) and Bilious(amandy) -> Arcadian(amandy)\n\nCervical(amandy)\n\nBilious(amandy) and forall x (Bilious(x) -> Trillion(x)) -> therefore Trillion(amandy) Trillion(amandy) and forall x (Trillion(x) -> Cervical(x)) -> therefore Cervical(amandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Lyda is revolved. Bamby is aliform. Bamby is acoustic. Elke is broadleaf. Elke is leaded. Elke is galled. Stacey is galled. If Lyda is princely then Lyda is aliform. All leaded things are princely. If something is leaded and princely then it is revolved. If something is galled and revolved then it is broadleaf. If something is princely then it is revolved. If Elke is broadleaf and Elke is leaded then Elke is aliform. Elke is not revolved.", "logic": "\nRevolved(lyda)\nAliform(bamby)\nAcoustic(bamby)\nBroadleaf(elke)\nLeaded(elke)\nGalled(elke)\nGalled(stacey)\nPrincely(lyda) -> Aliform(lyda)\nforall x (Leaded(x) -> Princely(x))\nforall x (Leaded(x) and Princely(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Galled(x) and Revolved(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\nforall x (Princely(x) -> Revolved(x))\nBroadleaf(elke) and Leaded(elke) -> Aliform(elke)\n\nnot Revolved(elke)\n\nLeaded(elke) and forall x (Leaded(x) -> Princely(x)) -> therefore Princely(elke) Princely(elke) and forall x (Princely(x) -> Revolved(x)) -> therefore Revolved(elke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Hillard is sporty. Lamont is adaptive. Lamont is linelike. Katee is filar. Katee is frowsy. Katee is italic. Jessamyn is italic. If Hillard is proximo then Hillard is adaptive. All frowsy things are proximo. If something is frowsy and proximo then it is sporty. If something is italic and sporty then it is filar. If something is proximo then it is sporty. If Katee is filar and Katee is frowsy then Katee is adaptive. Jessamyn is not proximo.", "logic": "\nSporty(hillard)\nAdaptive(lamont)\nLinelike(lamont)\nFilar(katee)\nFrowsy(katee)\nItalic(katee)\nItalic(jessamyn)\nProximo(hillard) -> Adaptive(hillard)\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Proximo(x))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) and Proximo(x) -> Sporty(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) and Sporty(x) -> Filar(x))\nforall x (Proximo(x) -> Sporty(x))\nFilar(katee) and Frowsy(katee) -> Adaptive(katee)\n\nnot Proximo(jessamyn)\n\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Proximo(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Ester is cyclic. Spike is demanding. Spike is gelid. Way is phylliform. Way is jerking. Way is beaded. Elsinore is beaded. If Ester is pituitary then Ester is demanding. All jerking things are pituitary. If something is jerking and pituitary then it is cyclic. If something is beaded and cyclic then it is phylliform. If something is pituitary then it is cyclic. If Way is phylliform and Way is jerking then Way is demanding. Spike is pituitary.", "logic": "\nCyclic(ester)\nDemanding(spike)\nGelid(spike)\nPhylliform(way)\nJerking(way)\nBeaded(way)\nBeaded(elsinore)\nPituitary(ester) -> Demanding(ester)\nforall x (Jerking(x) -> Pituitary(x))\nforall x (Jerking(x) and Pituitary(x) -> Cyclic(x))\nforall x (Beaded(x) and Cyclic(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) -> Cyclic(x))\nPhylliform(way) and Jerking(way) -> Demanding(way)\n\nPituitary(spike)\n\nforall x (Jerking(x) -> Pituitary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Emeline is moving. Sharlene is fuscous. Sharlene is frilled. Jenna is speechless. Jenna is iridaceous. Jenna is demoniac. Jacki is demoniac. If Emeline is above then Emeline is fuscous. All iridaceous things are above. If something is iridaceous and above then it is moving. If something is demoniac and moving then it is speechless. If something is above then it is moving. If Jenna is speechless and Jenna is iridaceous then Jenna is fuscous. Emeline is not above.", "logic": "\nMoving(emeline)\nFuscous(sharlene)\nFrilled(sharlene)\nSpeechless(jenna)\nIridaceous(jenna)\nDemoniac(jenna)\nDemoniac(jacki)\nAbove(emeline) -> Fuscous(emeline)\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Above(x))\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) and Above(x) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Demoniac(x) and Moving(x) -> Speechless(x))\nforall x (Above(x) -> Moving(x))\nSpeechless(jenna) and Iridaceous(jenna) -> Fuscous(jenna)\n\nnot Above(emeline)\n\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Above(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Raj is flemish. Seamus is andean. Seamus is vacuolated. Kinna is auriform. Kinna is harmonic. Kinna is silky. Pam is silky. If Raj is imitative then Raj is andean. All harmonic things are imitative. If something is harmonic and imitative then it is flemish. If something is silky and flemish then it is auriform. If something is imitative then it is flemish. If Kinna is auriform and Kinna is harmonic then Kinna is andean. Kinna is vacuolated.", "logic": "\nFlemish(raj)\nAndean(seamus)\nVacuolated(seamus)\nAuriform(kinna)\nHarmonic(kinna)\nSilky(kinna)\nSilky(pam)\nImitative(raj) -> Andean(raj)\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Imitative(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Imitative(x) -> Flemish(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) and Flemish(x) -> Auriform(x))\nforall x (Imitative(x) -> Flemish(x))\nAuriform(kinna) and Harmonic(kinna) -> Andean(kinna)\n\nVacuolated(kinna)\n\nVacuolated(kinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Rosalynd is repeatable. Dorotea is fortuitous. Dorotea is reserved. Jobye is heatless. Jobye is untoward. Jobye is repressive. Clifton is repressive. If Rosalynd is attached then Rosalynd is fortuitous. All untoward things are attached. If something is untoward and attached then it is repeatable. If something is repressive and repeatable then it is heatless. If something is attached then it is repeatable. If Jobye is heatless and Jobye is untoward then Jobye is fortuitous. Clifton is not reserved.", "logic": "\nRepeatable(rosalynd)\nFortuitous(dorotea)\nReserved(dorotea)\nHeatless(jobye)\nUntoward(jobye)\nRepressive(jobye)\nRepressive(clifton)\nAttached(rosalynd) -> Fortuitous(rosalynd)\nforall x (Untoward(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Untoward(x) and Attached(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Repressive(x) and Repeatable(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nHeatless(jobye) and Untoward(jobye) -> Fortuitous(jobye)\n\nnot Reserved(clifton)\n\nnot Reserved(clifton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "Christen is sugarless. Rik is raffish. Rik is warty. Thia is exempt. Thia is pupal. Thia is ecumenic. Hiralal is ecumenic. If Christen is semiweekly then Christen is raffish. All pupal things are semiweekly. If something is pupal and semiweekly then it is sugarless. If something is ecumenic and sugarless then it is exempt. If something is semiweekly then it is sugarless. If Thia is exempt and Thia is pupal then Thia is raffish. Christen is pupal.", "logic": "\nSugarless(christen)\nRaffish(rik)\nWarty(rik)\nExempt(thia)\nPupal(thia)\nEcumenic(thia)\nEcumenic(hiralal)\nSemiweekly(christen) -> Raffish(christen)\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) and Semiweekly(x) -> Sugarless(x))\nforall x (Ecumenic(x) and Sugarless(x) -> Exempt(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Sugarless(x))\nExempt(thia) and Pupal(thia) -> Raffish(thia)\n\nPupal(christen)\n\nPupal(christen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2108"} {"premises": "The cherise is outmoded. The cherise bedazzle the rube. The greta birle the rube. The greta is running. The greta bedazzle the cherise. The greta vitrify the rube. The rube birle the cherise. If something bedazzle the rube then it vitrify the greta. If something is riveting and undrawn then it birle the greta. If something vitrify the greta then it bedazzle the greta. The greta bedazzle the cherise.", "logic": "\nOutmoded(cherise)\nBedazzle(cherise, rube)\nBirle(greta, rube)\nRunning(greta)\nBedazzle(greta, cherise)\nVitrify(greta, rube)\nBirle(rube, cherise)\nforall x (Bedazzle(x, rube) -> Vitrify(x, greta))\nforall x (Riveting(x) and Undrawn(x) -> Birle(x, greta))\nforall x (Vitrify(x, greta) -> Bedazzle(x, greta))\n\nBedazzle(greta, cherise)\n\ntherefore Bedazzle(greta, cherise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The carlyle is brut. The carlyle forecast the jefry. The lind birdie the jefry. The lind is idolatrous. The lind forecast the carlyle. The lind enclose the jefry. The jefry birdie the carlyle. If something forecast the jefry then it enclose the lind. If something is absurd and panoplied then it birdie the lind. If something enclose the lind then it forecast the lind. The lind is not idolatrous.", "logic": "\nBrut(carlyle)\nForecast(carlyle, jefry)\nBirdie(lind, jefry)\nIdolatrous(lind)\nForecast(lind, carlyle)\nEnclose(lind, jefry)\nBirdie(jefry, carlyle)\nforall x (Forecast(x, jefry) -> Enclose(x, lind))\nforall x (Absurd(x) and Panoplied(x) -> Birdie(x, lind))\nforall x (Enclose(x, lind) -> Forecast(x, lind))\n\nnot Idolatrous(lind)\n\ntherefore Idolatrous(lind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The gordie is talented. The gordie rant the brad. The dustin forfend the brad. The dustin is formal. The dustin rant the gordie. The dustin bless the brad. The brad forfend the gordie. If something rant the brad then it bless the dustin. If something is crosstown and heated then it forfend the dustin. If something bless the dustin then it rant the dustin. The gordie bless the dustin.", "logic": "\nTalented(gordie)\nRant(gordie, brad)\nForfend(dustin, brad)\nFormal(dustin)\nRant(dustin, gordie)\nBless(dustin, brad)\nForfend(brad, gordie)\nforall x (Rant(x, brad) -> Bless(x, dustin))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) and Heated(x) -> Forfend(x, dustin))\nforall x (Bless(x, dustin) -> Rant(x, dustin))\n\nBless(gordie, dustin)\n\nRant(gordie, brad) and forall x (Rant(x, brad) -> Bless(x, dustin)) -> therefore Bless(gordie, dustin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The gwenora is olivelike. The gwenora placard the cybel. The ola lapidify the cybel. The ola is waxlike. The ola placard the gwenora. The ola etherize the cybel. The cybel lapidify the gwenora. If something placard the cybel then it etherize the ola. If something is dendroidal and indiscreet then it lapidify the ola. If something etherize the ola then it placard the ola. The gwenora does not visit the ola.", "logic": "\nOlivelike(gwenora)\nPlacard(gwenora, cybel)\nLapidify(ola, cybel)\nWaxlike(ola)\nPlacard(ola, gwenora)\nEtherize(ola, cybel)\nLapidify(cybel, gwenora)\nforall x (Placard(x, cybel) -> Etherize(x, ola))\nforall x (Dendroidal(x) and Indiscreet(x) -> Lapidify(x, ola))\nforall x (Etherize(x, ola) -> Placard(x, ola))\n\nnot Etherize(gwenora, ola)\n\nPlacard(gwenora, cybel) and forall x (Placard(x, cybel) -> Etherize(x, ola)) -> therefore Etherize(gwenora, ola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The freemon is expectable. The freemon squeak the mikael. The lilah practise the mikael. The lilah is maltreated. The lilah squeak the freemon. The lilah dicker the mikael. The mikael practise the freemon. If something squeak the mikael then it dicker the lilah. If something is aecial and higher then it practise the lilah. If something dicker the lilah then it squeak the lilah. The freemon squeak the lilah.", "logic": "\nExpectable(freemon)\nSqueak(freemon, mikael)\nPractise(lilah, mikael)\nMaltreated(lilah)\nSqueak(lilah, freemon)\nDicker(lilah, mikael)\nPractise(mikael, freemon)\nforall x (Squeak(x, mikael) -> Dicker(x, lilah))\nforall x (Aecial(x) and Higher(x) -> Practise(x, lilah))\nforall x (Dicker(x, lilah) -> Squeak(x, lilah))\n\nSqueak(freemon, lilah)\n\nSqueak(freemon, mikael) and forall x (Squeak(x, mikael) -> Dicker(x, lilah)) -> therefore Dicker(freemon, lilah) Dicker(freemon, lilah) and forall x (Dicker(x, lilah) -> Squeak(x, lilah)) -> therefore Squeak(freemon, lilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The kath is alexic. The kath irradiate the ripley. The jody handstamp the ripley. The jody is limited. The jody irradiate the kath. The jody nerve the ripley. The ripley handstamp the kath. If something irradiate the ripley then it nerve the jody. If something is aided and leavened then it handstamp the jody. If something nerve the jody then it irradiate the jody. The kath does not like the jody.", "logic": "\nAlexic(kath)\nIrradiate(kath, ripley)\nHandstamp(jody, ripley)\nLimited(jody)\nIrradiate(jody, kath)\nNerve(jody, ripley)\nHandstamp(ripley, kath)\nforall x (Irradiate(x, ripley) -> Nerve(x, jody))\nforall x (Aided(x) and Leavened(x) -> Handstamp(x, jody))\nforall x (Nerve(x, jody) -> Irradiate(x, jody))\n\nnot Irradiate(kath, jody)\n\nIrradiate(kath, ripley) and forall x (Irradiate(x, ripley) -> Nerve(x, jody)) -> therefore Nerve(kath, jody) Nerve(kath, jody) and forall x (Nerve(x, jody) -> Irradiate(x, jody)) -> therefore Irradiate(kath, jody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The eugene is unsought. The eugene eventuate the laureen. The colin miff the laureen. The colin is mealy. The colin eventuate the eugene. The colin father the laureen. The laureen miff the eugene. If something eventuate the laureen then it father the colin. If something is protective and rapid then it miff the colin. If something father the colin then it eventuate the colin. The colin does not like the colin.", "logic": "\nUnsought(eugene)\nEventuate(eugene, laureen)\nMiff(colin, laureen)\nMealy(colin)\nEventuate(colin, eugene)\nFather(colin, laureen)\nMiff(laureen, eugene)\nforall x (Eventuate(x, laureen) -> Father(x, colin))\nforall x (Protective(x) and Rapid(x) -> Miff(x, colin))\nforall x (Father(x, colin) -> Eventuate(x, colin))\n\nnot Eventuate(colin, colin)\n\nforall x (Father(x, colin) -> Eventuate(x, colin)) <- forall x (Eventuate(x, laureen) -> Father(x, colin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The nahum is dismissed. The nahum dibble the moshe. The kacie iridesce the moshe. The kacie is endozoic. The kacie dibble the nahum. The kacie indurate the moshe. The moshe iridesce the nahum. If something dibble the moshe then it indurate the kacie. If something is lvii and aerolitic then it iridesce the kacie. If something indurate the kacie then it dibble the kacie. The kacie indurate the kacie.", "logic": "\nDismissed(nahum)\nDibble(nahum, moshe)\nIridesce(kacie, moshe)\nEndozoic(kacie)\nDibble(kacie, nahum)\nIndurate(kacie, moshe)\nIridesce(moshe, nahum)\nforall x (Dibble(x, moshe) -> Indurate(x, kacie))\nforall x (Lvii(x) and Aerolitic(x) -> Iridesce(x, kacie))\nforall x (Indurate(x, kacie) -> Dibble(x, kacie))\n\nIndurate(kacie, kacie)\n\nforall x (Dibble(x, moshe) -> Indurate(x, kacie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The demetria is demode. The demetria symmetrize the samson. The elberta adduct the samson. The elberta is dorsal. The elberta symmetrize the demetria. The elberta hand the samson. The samson adduct the demetria. If something symmetrize the samson then it hand the elberta. If something is carbonated and particular then it adduct the elberta. If something hand the elberta then it symmetrize the elberta. The demetria does not chase the elberta.", "logic": "\nDemode(demetria)\nSymmetrize(demetria, samson)\nAdduct(elberta, samson)\nDorsal(elberta)\nSymmetrize(elberta, demetria)\nHand(elberta, samson)\nAdduct(samson, demetria)\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, samson) -> Hand(x, elberta))\nforall x (Carbonated(x) and Particular(x) -> Adduct(x, elberta))\nforall x (Hand(x, elberta) -> Symmetrize(x, elberta))\n\nnot Adduct(demetria, elberta)\n\nforall x (Carbonated(x) and Particular(x) -> Adduct(x, elberta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The lamont is frequent. The lamont avulse the louisa. The filippa better the louisa. The filippa is seaborne. The filippa avulse the lamont. The filippa protract the louisa. The louisa better the lamont. If something avulse the louisa then it protract the filippa. If something is reedy and biweekly then it better the filippa. If something protract the filippa then it avulse the filippa. The louisa protract the louisa.", "logic": "\nFrequent(lamont)\nAvulse(lamont, louisa)\nBetter(filippa, louisa)\nSeaborne(filippa)\nAvulse(filippa, lamont)\nProtract(filippa, louisa)\nBetter(louisa, lamont)\nforall x (Avulse(x, louisa) -> Protract(x, filippa))\nforall x (Reedy(x) and Biweekly(x) -> Better(x, filippa))\nforall x (Protract(x, filippa) -> Avulse(x, filippa))\n\nProtract(louisa, louisa)\n\nProtract(louisa, louisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The saree is philatelic. The saree unhook the codie. The vonny hull the codie. The vonny is botonee. The vonny unhook the saree. The vonny gutter the codie. The codie hull the saree. If something unhook the codie then it gutter the vonny. If something is uneducated and iliac then it hull the vonny. If something gutter the vonny then it unhook the vonny. The saree does not visit the saree.", "logic": "\nPhilatelic(saree)\nUnhook(saree, codie)\nHull(vonny, codie)\nBotonee(vonny)\nUnhook(vonny, saree)\nGutter(vonny, codie)\nHull(codie, saree)\nforall x (Unhook(x, codie) -> Gutter(x, vonny))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Iliac(x) -> Hull(x, vonny))\nforall x (Gutter(x, vonny) -> Unhook(x, vonny))\n\nnot Gutter(saree, saree)\n\nnot Gutter(saree, saree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The aurelia is abandoned. The aurelia teethe the jae. The kissee currycomb the jae. The kissee is panoramic. The kissee teethe the aurelia. The kissee archaize the jae. The jae currycomb the aurelia. If something teethe the jae then it archaize the kissee. If something is paired and grim then it currycomb the kissee. If something archaize the kissee then it teethe the kissee. The jae is grim.", "logic": "\nAbandoned(aurelia)\nTeethe(aurelia, jae)\nCurrycomb(kissee, jae)\nPanoramic(kissee)\nTeethe(kissee, aurelia)\nArchaize(kissee, jae)\nCurrycomb(jae, aurelia)\nforall x (Teethe(x, jae) -> Archaize(x, kissee))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Grim(x) -> Currycomb(x, kissee))\nforall x (Archaize(x, kissee) -> Teethe(x, kissee))\n\nGrim(jae)\n\nGrim(jae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "Cindee is coloured. Adnan is observable. Adnan is coloured. Adnan is casuistic. Koren is not observable. Kathrine is gigantic. Kathrine is zapotec. If something is observable then it is bodyless. Red things are observable. Kathrine is gigantic.", "logic": "\nColoured(cindee)\nObservable(adnan)\nColoured(adnan)\nCasuistic(adnan)\nnot Observable(koren)\nGigantic(kathrine)\nZapotec(kathrine)\nforall x (Observable(x) -> Bodyless(x))\nforall x (Coloured(x) -> Observable(x))\n\nGigantic(kathrine)\n\ntherefore Gigantic(kathrine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Jorie is theist. Revkah is botonee. Revkah is theist. Revkah is allegretto. Siouxie is not botonee. Giselle is yugoslav. Giselle is adynamic. If something is botonee then it is foreboding. Red things are botonee. Siouxie is botonee.", "logic": "\nTheist(jorie)\nBotonee(revkah)\nTheist(revkah)\nAllegretto(revkah)\nnot Botonee(siouxie)\nYugoslav(giselle)\nAdynamic(giselle)\nforall x (Botonee(x) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Theist(x) -> Botonee(x))\n\nBotonee(siouxie)\n\ntherefore not Botonee(siouxie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Annette is omnibus. Birgitta is mortifying. Birgitta is omnibus. Birgitta is baleful. Judas is not mortifying. Standford is anaglyptic. Standford is laniary. If something is mortifying then it is tallish. Red things are mortifying. Birgitta is tallish.", "logic": "\nOmnibus(annette)\nMortifying(birgitta)\nOmnibus(birgitta)\nBaleful(birgitta)\nnot Mortifying(judas)\nAnaglyptic(standford)\nLaniary(standford)\nforall x (Mortifying(x) -> Tallish(x))\nforall x (Omnibus(x) -> Mortifying(x))\n\nTallish(birgitta)\n\nMortifying(birgitta) and forall x (Mortifying(x) -> Tallish(x)) -> therefore Tallish(birgitta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Kylynn is aggravated. Charlot is painless. Charlot is aggravated. Charlot is horrid. Gayle is not painless. Evey is asian. Evey is grizzly. If something is painless then it is bastardly. Red things are painless. Charlot is not bastardly.", "logic": "\nAggravated(kylynn)\nPainless(charlot)\nAggravated(charlot)\nHorrid(charlot)\nnot Painless(gayle)\nAsian(evey)\nGrizzly(evey)\nforall x (Painless(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Painless(x))\n\nnot Bastardly(charlot)\n\nPainless(charlot) and forall x (Painless(x) -> Bastardly(x)) -> therefore Bastardly(charlot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Maisey is macaronic. Osmund is chelated. Osmund is macaronic. Osmund is retiring. Emmit is not chelated. Louella is tough. Louella is rending. If something is chelated then it is infrequent. Red things are chelated. Maisey is infrequent.", "logic": "\nMacaronic(maisey)\nChelated(osmund)\nMacaronic(osmund)\nRetiring(osmund)\nnot Chelated(emmit)\nTough(louella)\nRending(louella)\nforall x (Chelated(x) -> Infrequent(x))\nforall x (Macaronic(x) -> Chelated(x))\n\nInfrequent(maisey)\n\nMacaronic(maisey) and forall x (Macaronic(x) -> Chelated(x)) -> therefore Chelated(maisey) Chelated(maisey) and forall x (Chelated(x) -> Infrequent(x)) -> therefore Infrequent(maisey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Lilia is humane. Alene is ideologic. Alene is humane. Alene is ended. Udell is not ideologic. Tanny is prognostic. Tanny is biconvex. If something is ideologic then it is smoothed. Red things are ideologic. Lilia is not smoothed.", "logic": "\nHumane(lilia)\nIdeologic(alene)\nHumane(alene)\nEnded(alene)\nnot Ideologic(udell)\nPrognostic(tanny)\nBiconvex(tanny)\nforall x (Ideologic(x) -> Smoothed(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) -> Ideologic(x))\n\nnot Smoothed(lilia)\n\nHumane(lilia) and forall x (Humane(x) -> Ideologic(x)) -> therefore Ideologic(lilia) Ideologic(lilia) and forall x (Ideologic(x) -> Smoothed(x)) -> therefore Smoothed(lilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Lovell is gluteal. Pate is curvey. Pate is gluteal. Pate is riemannian. Tobey is not curvey. Stephi is beseeching. Stephi is cockamamy. If something is curvey then it is spellbound. Red things are curvey. Stephi is not spellbound.", "logic": "\nGluteal(lovell)\nCurvey(pate)\nGluteal(pate)\nRiemannian(pate)\nnot Curvey(tobey)\nBeseeching(stephi)\nCockamamy(stephi)\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Spellbound(x))\nforall x (Gluteal(x) -> Curvey(x))\n\nnot Spellbound(stephi)\n\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Spellbound(x)) <- forall x (Gluteal(x) -> Curvey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Gertrud is intense. Harriette is burked. Harriette is intense. Harriette is annulate. Verina is not burked. Izzy is mensurable. Izzy is afloat. If something is burked then it is holey. Red things are burked. Verina is holey.", "logic": "\nIntense(gertrud)\nBurked(harriette)\nIntense(harriette)\nAnnulate(harriette)\nnot Burked(verina)\nMensurable(izzy)\nAfloat(izzy)\nforall x (Burked(x) -> Holey(x))\nforall x (Intense(x) -> Burked(x))\n\nHoley(verina)\n\nforall x (Burked(x) -> Holey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Linda is unbent. Dorthy is unnoted. Dorthy is unbent. Dorthy is doddering. West is not unnoted. Hewitt is unsung. Hewitt is relaxing. If something is unnoted then it is candescent. Red things are unnoted. Hewitt is not unnoted.", "logic": "\nUnbent(linda)\nUnnoted(dorthy)\nUnbent(dorthy)\nDoddering(dorthy)\nnot Unnoted(west)\nUnsung(hewitt)\nRelaxing(hewitt)\nforall x (Unnoted(x) -> Candescent(x))\nforall x (Unbent(x) -> Unnoted(x))\n\nnot Unnoted(hewitt)\n\nforall x (Unbent(x) -> Unnoted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Alasdair is punctual. Ingram is acaudal. Ingram is punctual. Ingram is ferric. Kincaid is not acaudal. Esmerelda is taciturn. Esmerelda is pandemic. If something is acaudal then it is healing. Red things are acaudal. Ingram is taciturn.", "logic": "\nPunctual(alasdair)\nAcaudal(ingram)\nPunctual(ingram)\nFerric(ingram)\nnot Acaudal(kincaid)\nTaciturn(esmerelda)\nPandemic(esmerelda)\nforall x (Acaudal(x) -> Healing(x))\nforall x (Punctual(x) -> Acaudal(x))\n\nTaciturn(ingram)\n\nTaciturn(ingram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Kenny is neuromotor. Osmund is accustomed. Osmund is neuromotor. Osmund is cloggy. Florina is not accustomed. Godfree is horrific. Godfree is pouring. If something is accustomed then it is unblended. Red things are accustomed. Kenny is not cloggy.", "logic": "\nNeuromotor(kenny)\nAccustomed(osmund)\nNeuromotor(osmund)\nCloggy(osmund)\nnot Accustomed(florina)\nHorrific(godfree)\nPouring(godfree)\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Unblended(x))\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) -> Accustomed(x))\n\nnot Cloggy(kenny)\n\nnot Cloggy(kenny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "Eddi is dalmatian. Gael is severed. Gael is dalmatian. Gael is regal. Willetta is not severed. Nissy is false. Nissy is undeserved. If something is severed then it is acronymic. Red things are severed. Willetta is regal.", "logic": "\nDalmatian(eddi)\nSevered(gael)\nDalmatian(gael)\nRegal(gael)\nnot Severed(willetta)\nFalse(nissy)\nUndeserved(nissy)\nforall x (Severed(x) -> Acronymic(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) -> Severed(x))\n\nRegal(willetta)\n\nRegal(willetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-250"} {"premises": "The gabriella irradiate the hally. The gabriella horsewhip the hally. The beverlee is ternate. The beverlee horsewhip the hally. The hally irradiate the gabriella. The hally irradiate the beverlee. The hally is sandpapery. The hally is prophetic. The hally horsewhip the gabriella. The hally buoy the beverlee. If the beverlee is operant then the beverlee is ternate. If someone irradiate the gabriella and the gabriella is operant then the gabriella horsewhip the beverlee. If someone is quickset and they see the gabriella then the gabriella irradiate the hally. If someone is operant and they chase the hally then they chase the gabriella. If the hally is prophetic and the hally irradiate the gabriella then the hally horsewhip the beverlee. If someone is quickset then they chase the gabriella. If someone horsewhip the beverlee and they chase the beverlee then they see the gabriella. If someone horsewhip the beverlee and they chase the beverlee then they are quickset. The gabriella horsewhip the hally.", "logic": "\nIrradiate(gabriella, hally)\nHorsewhip(gabriella, hally)\nTernate(beverlee)\nHorsewhip(beverlee, hally)\nIrradiate(hally, gabriella)\nIrradiate(hally, beverlee)\nSandpapery(hally)\nProphetic(hally)\nHorsewhip(hally, gabriella)\nBuoy(hally, beverlee)\nOperant(beverlee) -> Ternate(beverlee)\nforall x (Irradiate(x, gabriella) and Operant(gabriella) -> Horsewhip(gabriella, beverlee))\nforall x (Quickset(x) and Buoy(x, gabriella) -> Irradiate(gabriella, hally))\nforall x (Operant(x) and Irradiate(x, hally) -> Irradiate(x, gabriella))\nProphetic(hally) and Irradiate(hally, gabriella) -> Horsewhip(hally, beverlee)\nforall x (Quickset(x) -> Irradiate(x, gabriella))\nforall x (Horsewhip(x, beverlee) and Irradiate(x, beverlee) -> Buoy(x, gabriella))\nforall x (Horsewhip(x, beverlee) and Irradiate(x, beverlee) -> Quickset(x))\n\nHorsewhip(gabriella, hally)\n\ntherefore Horsewhip(gabriella, hally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The randolf gazump the tirrell. The randolf engild the tirrell. The lissa is asserting. The lissa engild the tirrell. The tirrell gazump the randolf. The tirrell gazump the lissa. The tirrell is cloudy. The tirrell is navigable. The tirrell engild the randolf. The tirrell assail the lissa. If the lissa is radial then the lissa is asserting. If someone gazump the randolf and the randolf is radial then the randolf engild the lissa. If someone is divided and they see the randolf then the randolf gazump the tirrell. If someone is radial and they chase the tirrell then they chase the randolf. If the tirrell is navigable and the tirrell gazump the randolf then the tirrell engild the lissa. If someone is divided then they chase the randolf. If someone engild the lissa and they chase the lissa then they see the randolf. If someone engild the lissa and they chase the lissa then they are divided. The tirrell does not chase the randolf.", "logic": "\nGazump(randolf, tirrell)\nEngild(randolf, tirrell)\nAsserting(lissa)\nEngild(lissa, tirrell)\nGazump(tirrell, randolf)\nGazump(tirrell, lissa)\nCloudy(tirrell)\nNavigable(tirrell)\nEngild(tirrell, randolf)\nAssail(tirrell, lissa)\nRadial(lissa) -> Asserting(lissa)\nforall x (Gazump(x, randolf) and Radial(randolf) -> Engild(randolf, lissa))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Assail(x, randolf) -> Gazump(randolf, tirrell))\nforall x (Radial(x) and Gazump(x, tirrell) -> Gazump(x, randolf))\nNavigable(tirrell) and Gazump(tirrell, randolf) -> Engild(tirrell, lissa)\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Gazump(x, randolf))\nforall x (Engild(x, lissa) and Gazump(x, lissa) -> Assail(x, randolf))\nforall x (Engild(x, lissa) and Gazump(x, lissa) -> Divided(x))\n\nnot Gazump(tirrell, randolf)\n\ntherefore Gazump(tirrell, randolf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The lenny scranch the powell. The lenny ransom the powell. The armando is residual. The armando ransom the powell. The powell scranch the lenny. The powell scranch the armando. The powell is nonviable. The powell is imported. The powell ransom the lenny. The powell unseal the armando. If the armando is shattered then the armando is residual. If someone scranch the lenny and the lenny is shattered then the lenny ransom the armando. If someone is elliptical and they see the lenny then the lenny scranch the powell. If someone is shattered and they chase the powell then they chase the lenny. If the powell is imported and the powell scranch the lenny then the powell ransom the armando. If someone is elliptical then they chase the lenny. If someone ransom the armando and they chase the armando then they see the lenny. If someone ransom the armando and they chase the armando then they are elliptical. The powell ransom the armando.", "logic": "\nScranch(lenny, powell)\nRansom(lenny, powell)\nResidual(armando)\nRansom(armando, powell)\nScranch(powell, lenny)\nScranch(powell, armando)\nNonviable(powell)\nImported(powell)\nRansom(powell, lenny)\nUnseal(powell, armando)\nShattered(armando) -> Residual(armando)\nforall x (Scranch(x, lenny) and Shattered(lenny) -> Ransom(lenny, armando))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) and Unseal(x, lenny) -> Scranch(lenny, powell))\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Scranch(x, powell) -> Scranch(x, lenny))\nImported(powell) and Scranch(powell, lenny) -> Ransom(powell, armando)\nforall x (Elliptical(x) -> Scranch(x, lenny))\nforall x (Ransom(x, armando) and Scranch(x, armando) -> Unseal(x, lenny))\nforall x (Ransom(x, armando) and Scranch(x, armando) -> Elliptical(x))\n\nRansom(powell, armando)\n\nImported(powell) and Scranch(powell, lenny) and Imported(powell) and Scranch(powell, lenny) -> Ransom(powell, armando) -> therefore Ransom(powell, armando)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The nicolas theologise the petr. The nicolas picnic the petr. The merla is aluminous. The merla picnic the petr. The petr theologise the nicolas. The petr theologise the merla. The petr is shrewish. The petr is benighted. The petr picnic the nicolas. The petr savor the merla. If the merla is squeezable then the merla is aluminous. If someone theologise the nicolas and the nicolas is squeezable then the nicolas picnic the merla. If someone is yankee and they see the nicolas then the nicolas theologise the petr. If someone is squeezable and they chase the petr then they chase the nicolas. If the petr is benighted and the petr theologise the nicolas then the petr picnic the merla. If someone is yankee then they chase the nicolas. If someone picnic the merla and they chase the merla then they see the nicolas. If someone picnic the merla and they chase the merla then they are yankee. The petr does not need the merla.", "logic": "\nTheologise(nicolas, petr)\nPicnic(nicolas, petr)\nAluminous(merla)\nPicnic(merla, petr)\nTheologise(petr, nicolas)\nTheologise(petr, merla)\nShrewish(petr)\nBenighted(petr)\nPicnic(petr, nicolas)\nSavor(petr, merla)\nSqueezable(merla) -> Aluminous(merla)\nforall x (Theologise(x, nicolas) and Squeezable(nicolas) -> Picnic(nicolas, merla))\nforall x (Yankee(x) and Savor(x, nicolas) -> Theologise(nicolas, petr))\nforall x (Squeezable(x) and Theologise(x, petr) -> Theologise(x, nicolas))\nBenighted(petr) and Theologise(petr, nicolas) -> Picnic(petr, merla)\nforall x (Yankee(x) -> Theologise(x, nicolas))\nforall x (Picnic(x, merla) and Theologise(x, merla) -> Savor(x, nicolas))\nforall x (Picnic(x, merla) and Theologise(x, merla) -> Yankee(x))\n\nnot Picnic(petr, merla)\n\nBenighted(petr) and Theologise(petr, nicolas) and Benighted(petr) and Theologise(petr, nicolas) -> Picnic(petr, merla) -> therefore Picnic(petr, merla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The annemarie hybridise the shepard. The annemarie kennel the shepard. The eduard is relaxed. The eduard kennel the shepard. The shepard hybridise the annemarie. The shepard hybridise the eduard. The shepard is eellike. The shepard is uric. The shepard kennel the annemarie. The shepard mark the eduard. If the eduard is aculeated then the eduard is relaxed. If someone hybridise the annemarie and the annemarie is aculeated then the annemarie kennel the eduard. If someone is hushed and they see the annemarie then the annemarie hybridise the shepard. If someone is aculeated and they chase the shepard then they chase the annemarie. If the shepard is uric and the shepard hybridise the annemarie then the shepard kennel the eduard. If someone is hushed then they chase the annemarie. If someone kennel the eduard and they chase the eduard then they see the annemarie. If someone kennel the eduard and they chase the eduard then they are hushed. The shepard is hushed.", "logic": "\nHybridise(annemarie, shepard)\nKennel(annemarie, shepard)\nRelaxed(eduard)\nKennel(eduard, shepard)\nHybridise(shepard, annemarie)\nHybridise(shepard, eduard)\nEellike(shepard)\nUric(shepard)\nKennel(shepard, annemarie)\nMark(shepard, eduard)\nAculeated(eduard) -> Relaxed(eduard)\nforall x (Hybridise(x, annemarie) and Aculeated(annemarie) -> Kennel(annemarie, eduard))\nforall x (Hushed(x) and Mark(x, annemarie) -> Hybridise(annemarie, shepard))\nforall x (Aculeated(x) and Hybridise(x, shepard) -> Hybridise(x, annemarie))\nUric(shepard) and Hybridise(shepard, annemarie) -> Kennel(shepard, eduard)\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Hybridise(x, annemarie))\nforall x (Kennel(x, eduard) and Hybridise(x, eduard) -> Mark(x, annemarie))\nforall x (Kennel(x, eduard) and Hybridise(x, eduard) -> Hushed(x))\n\nHushed(shepard)\n\nUric(shepard) and Hybridise(shepard, annemarie) and Uric(shepard) and Hybridise(shepard, annemarie) -> Kennel(shepard, eduard) -> therefore Kennel(shepard, eduard) Kennel(shepard, eduard) and Hybridise(shepard, eduard) and forall x (Kennel(x, eduard) and Hybridise(x, eduard) -> Hushed(x)) -> therefore Hushed(shepard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The orren reconvene the karole. The orren copyright the karole. The starla is bedimmed. The starla copyright the karole. The karole reconvene the orren. The karole reconvene the starla. The karole is gray. The karole is jazzy. The karole copyright the orren. The karole repossess the starla. If the starla is unremarked then the starla is bedimmed. If someone reconvene the orren and the orren is unremarked then the orren copyright the starla. If someone is lustrous and they see the orren then the orren reconvene the karole. If someone is unremarked and they chase the karole then they chase the orren. If the karole is jazzy and the karole reconvene the orren then the karole copyright the starla. If someone is lustrous then they chase the orren. If someone copyright the starla and they chase the starla then they see the orren. If someone copyright the starla and they chase the starla then they are lustrous. The karole is not lustrous.", "logic": "\nReconvene(orren, karole)\nCopyright(orren, karole)\nBedimmed(starla)\nCopyright(starla, karole)\nReconvene(karole, orren)\nReconvene(karole, starla)\nGray(karole)\nJazzy(karole)\nCopyright(karole, orren)\nRepossess(karole, starla)\nUnremarked(starla) -> Bedimmed(starla)\nforall x (Reconvene(x, orren) and Unremarked(orren) -> Copyright(orren, starla))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) and Repossess(x, orren) -> Reconvene(orren, karole))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) and Reconvene(x, karole) -> Reconvene(x, orren))\nJazzy(karole) and Reconvene(karole, orren) -> Copyright(karole, starla)\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Reconvene(x, orren))\nforall x (Copyright(x, starla) and Reconvene(x, starla) -> Repossess(x, orren))\nforall x (Copyright(x, starla) and Reconvene(x, starla) -> Lustrous(x))\n\nnot Lustrous(karole)\n\nJazzy(karole) and Reconvene(karole, orren) and Jazzy(karole) and Reconvene(karole, orren) -> Copyright(karole, starla) -> therefore Copyright(karole, starla) Copyright(karole, starla) and Reconvene(karole, starla) and forall x (Copyright(x, starla) and Reconvene(x, starla) -> Lustrous(x)) -> therefore Lustrous(karole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The olympia educate the cesar. The olympia outcall the cesar. The allin is scrappy. The allin outcall the cesar. The cesar educate the olympia. The cesar educate the allin. The cesar is unbridled. The cesar is tabby. The cesar outcall the olympia. The cesar fructify the allin. If the allin is satyric then the allin is scrappy. If someone educate the olympia and the olympia is satyric then the olympia outcall the allin. If someone is pardonable and they see the olympia then the olympia educate the cesar. If someone is satyric and they chase the cesar then they chase the olympia. If the cesar is tabby and the cesar educate the olympia then the cesar outcall the allin. If someone is pardonable then they chase the olympia. If someone outcall the allin and they chase the allin then they see the olympia. If someone outcall the allin and they chase the allin then they are pardonable. The allin does not see the olympia.", "logic": "\nEducate(olympia, cesar)\nOutcall(olympia, cesar)\nScrappy(allin)\nOutcall(allin, cesar)\nEducate(cesar, olympia)\nEducate(cesar, allin)\nUnbridled(cesar)\nTabby(cesar)\nOutcall(cesar, olympia)\nFructify(cesar, allin)\nSatyric(allin) -> Scrappy(allin)\nforall x (Educate(x, olympia) and Satyric(olympia) -> Outcall(olympia, allin))\nforall x (Pardonable(x) and Fructify(x, olympia) -> Educate(olympia, cesar))\nforall x (Satyric(x) and Educate(x, cesar) -> Educate(x, olympia))\nTabby(cesar) and Educate(cesar, olympia) -> Outcall(cesar, allin)\nforall x (Pardonable(x) -> Educate(x, olympia))\nforall x (Outcall(x, allin) and Educate(x, allin) -> Fructify(x, olympia))\nforall x (Outcall(x, allin) and Educate(x, allin) -> Pardonable(x))\n\nnot Fructify(allin, olympia)\n\nforall x (Outcall(x, allin) and Educate(x, allin) -> Fructify(x, olympia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The stanley qualify the libbi. The stanley stash the libbi. The karon is curtained. The karon stash the libbi. The libbi qualify the stanley. The libbi qualify the karon. The libbi is strapping. The libbi is curatorial. The libbi stash the stanley. The libbi adolesce the karon. If the karon is rwandan then the karon is curtained. If someone qualify the stanley and the stanley is rwandan then the stanley stash the karon. If someone is mouthlike and they see the stanley then the stanley qualify the libbi. If someone is rwandan and they chase the libbi then they chase the stanley. If the libbi is curatorial and the libbi qualify the stanley then the libbi stash the karon. If someone is mouthlike then they chase the stanley. If someone stash the karon and they chase the karon then they see the stanley. If someone stash the karon and they chase the karon then they are mouthlike. The stanley qualify the stanley.", "logic": "\nQualify(stanley, libbi)\nStash(stanley, libbi)\nCurtained(karon)\nStash(karon, libbi)\nQualify(libbi, stanley)\nQualify(libbi, karon)\nStrapping(libbi)\nCuratorial(libbi)\nStash(libbi, stanley)\nAdolesce(libbi, karon)\nRwandan(karon) -> Curtained(karon)\nforall x (Qualify(x, stanley) and Rwandan(stanley) -> Stash(stanley, karon))\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) and Adolesce(x, stanley) -> Qualify(stanley, libbi))\nforall x (Rwandan(x) and Qualify(x, libbi) -> Qualify(x, stanley))\nCuratorial(libbi) and Qualify(libbi, stanley) -> Stash(libbi, karon)\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) -> Qualify(x, stanley))\nforall x (Stash(x, karon) and Qualify(x, karon) -> Adolesce(x, stanley))\nforall x (Stash(x, karon) and Qualify(x, karon) -> Mouthlike(x))\n\nQualify(stanley, stanley)\n\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) -> Qualify(x, stanley)) <- forall x (Stash(x, karon) and Qualify(x, karon) -> Mouthlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The truman action the davy. The truman apprentice the davy. The layne is umptieth. The layne apprentice the davy. The davy action the truman. The davy action the layne. The davy is limacine. The davy is jangling. The davy apprentice the truman. The davy summer the layne. If the layne is repugnant then the layne is umptieth. If someone action the truman and the truman is repugnant then the truman apprentice the layne. If someone is vehement and they see the truman then the truman action the davy. If someone is repugnant and they chase the davy then they chase the truman. If the davy is jangling and the davy action the truman then the davy apprentice the layne. If someone is vehement then they chase the truman. If someone apprentice the layne and they chase the layne then they see the truman. If someone apprentice the layne and they chase the layne then they are vehement. The truman does not see the truman.", "logic": "\nAction(truman, davy)\nApprentice(truman, davy)\nUmptieth(layne)\nApprentice(layne, davy)\nAction(davy, truman)\nAction(davy, layne)\nLimacine(davy)\nJangling(davy)\nApprentice(davy, truman)\nSummer(davy, layne)\nRepugnant(layne) -> Umptieth(layne)\nforall x (Action(x, truman) and Repugnant(truman) -> Apprentice(truman, layne))\nforall x (Vehement(x) and Summer(x, truman) -> Action(truman, davy))\nforall x (Repugnant(x) and Action(x, davy) -> Action(x, truman))\nJangling(davy) and Action(davy, truman) -> Apprentice(davy, layne)\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Action(x, truman))\nforall x (Apprentice(x, layne) and Action(x, layne) -> Summer(x, truman))\nforall x (Apprentice(x, layne) and Action(x, layne) -> Vehement(x))\n\nnot Summer(truman, truman)\n\nforall x (Apprentice(x, layne) and Action(x, layne) -> Summer(x, truman)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The odelle tamp the lorene. The odelle oppugn the lorene. The worthy is amnionic. The worthy oppugn the lorene. The lorene tamp the odelle. The lorene tamp the worthy. The lorene is troublous. The lorene is inbuilt. The lorene oppugn the odelle. The lorene bituminize the worthy. If the worthy is oxidised then the worthy is amnionic. If someone tamp the odelle and the odelle is oxidised then the odelle oppugn the worthy. If someone is whopping and they see the odelle then the odelle tamp the lorene. If someone is oxidised and they chase the lorene then they chase the odelle. If the lorene is inbuilt and the lorene tamp the odelle then the lorene oppugn the worthy. If someone is whopping then they chase the odelle. If someone oppugn the worthy and they chase the worthy then they see the odelle. If someone oppugn the worthy and they chase the worthy then they are whopping. The worthy bituminize the worthy.", "logic": "\nTamp(odelle, lorene)\nOppugn(odelle, lorene)\nAmnionic(worthy)\nOppugn(worthy, lorene)\nTamp(lorene, odelle)\nTamp(lorene, worthy)\nTroublous(lorene)\nInbuilt(lorene)\nOppugn(lorene, odelle)\nBituminize(lorene, worthy)\nOxidised(worthy) -> Amnionic(worthy)\nforall x (Tamp(x, odelle) and Oxidised(odelle) -> Oppugn(odelle, worthy))\nforall x (Whopping(x) and Bituminize(x, odelle) -> Tamp(odelle, lorene))\nforall x (Oxidised(x) and Tamp(x, lorene) -> Tamp(x, odelle))\nInbuilt(lorene) and Tamp(lorene, odelle) -> Oppugn(lorene, worthy)\nforall x (Whopping(x) -> Tamp(x, odelle))\nforall x (Oppugn(x, worthy) and Tamp(x, worthy) -> Bituminize(x, odelle))\nforall x (Oppugn(x, worthy) and Tamp(x, worthy) -> Whopping(x))\n\nBituminize(worthy, worthy)\n\nBituminize(worthy, worthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The imojean mind the belita. The imojean motivate the belita. The timothee is nighted. The timothee motivate the belita. The belita mind the imojean. The belita mind the timothee. The belita is unsullied. The belita is albescent. The belita motivate the imojean. The belita surfboard the timothee. If the timothee is striking then the timothee is nighted. If someone mind the imojean and the imojean is striking then the imojean motivate the timothee. If someone is directing and they see the imojean then the imojean mind the belita. If someone is striking and they chase the belita then they chase the imojean. If the belita is albescent and the belita mind the imojean then the belita motivate the timothee. If someone is directing then they chase the imojean. If someone motivate the timothee and they chase the timothee then they see the imojean. If someone motivate the timothee and they chase the timothee then they are directing. The imojean does not see the belita.", "logic": "\nMind(imojean, belita)\nMotivate(imojean, belita)\nNighted(timothee)\nMotivate(timothee, belita)\nMind(belita, imojean)\nMind(belita, timothee)\nUnsullied(belita)\nAlbescent(belita)\nMotivate(belita, imojean)\nSurfboard(belita, timothee)\nStriking(timothee) -> Nighted(timothee)\nforall x (Mind(x, imojean) and Striking(imojean) -> Motivate(imojean, timothee))\nforall x (Directing(x) and Surfboard(x, imojean) -> Mind(imojean, belita))\nforall x (Striking(x) and Mind(x, belita) -> Mind(x, imojean))\nAlbescent(belita) and Mind(belita, imojean) -> Motivate(belita, timothee)\nforall x (Directing(x) -> Mind(x, imojean))\nforall x (Motivate(x, timothee) and Mind(x, timothee) -> Surfboard(x, imojean))\nforall x (Motivate(x, timothee) and Mind(x, timothee) -> Directing(x))\n\nnot Surfboard(imojean, belita)\n\nnot Surfboard(imojean, belita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "The lynnet aspire the raychel. The lynnet typewrite the raychel. The camella is combatant. The camella typewrite the raychel. The raychel aspire the lynnet. The raychel aspire the camella. The raychel is unfearing. The raychel is infernal. The raychel typewrite the lynnet. The raychel recognize the camella. If the camella is concave then the camella is combatant. If someone aspire the lynnet and the lynnet is concave then the lynnet typewrite the camella. If someone is temporal and they see the lynnet then the lynnet aspire the raychel. If someone is concave and they chase the raychel then they chase the lynnet. If the raychel is infernal and the raychel aspire the lynnet then the raychel typewrite the camella. If someone is temporal then they chase the lynnet. If someone typewrite the camella and they chase the camella then they see the lynnet. If someone typewrite the camella and they chase the camella then they are temporal. The lynnet is unfearing.", "logic": "\nAspire(lynnet, raychel)\nTypewrite(lynnet, raychel)\nCombatant(camella)\nTypewrite(camella, raychel)\nAspire(raychel, lynnet)\nAspire(raychel, camella)\nUnfearing(raychel)\nInfernal(raychel)\nTypewrite(raychel, lynnet)\nRecognize(raychel, camella)\nConcave(camella) -> Combatant(camella)\nforall x (Aspire(x, lynnet) and Concave(lynnet) -> Typewrite(lynnet, camella))\nforall x (Temporal(x) and Recognize(x, lynnet) -> Aspire(lynnet, raychel))\nforall x (Concave(x) and Aspire(x, raychel) -> Aspire(x, lynnet))\nInfernal(raychel) and Aspire(raychel, lynnet) -> Typewrite(raychel, camella)\nforall x (Temporal(x) -> Aspire(x, lynnet))\nforall x (Typewrite(x, camella) and Aspire(x, camella) -> Recognize(x, lynnet))\nforall x (Typewrite(x, camella) and Aspire(x, camella) -> Temporal(x))\n\nUnfearing(lynnet)\n\nUnfearing(lynnet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-884"} {"premises": "Rudolfo is robustious. Lex is not dyspneic. Carrol is not caesural. Suzi is intrastate. Cold things are olivelike. If Carrol is multiplied then Carrol is not caesural. Young things are caesural. Suzi is intrastate.", "logic": "\nRobustious(rudolfo)\nnot Dyspneic(lex)\nnot Caesural(carrol)\nIntrastate(suzi)\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Olivelike(x))\nMultiplied(carrol) -> not Caesural(carrol)\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> Caesural(x))\n\nIntrastate(suzi)\n\ntherefore Intrastate(suzi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Abbe is addlepated. Tisha is not emotional. Josephine is not erroneous. Pippy is cryonic. Cold things are lupine. If Josephine is regular then Josephine is not erroneous. Young things are erroneous. Pippy is not cryonic.", "logic": "\nAddlepated(abbe)\nnot Emotional(tisha)\nnot Erroneous(josephine)\nCryonic(pippy)\nforall x (Erroneous(x) -> Lupine(x))\nRegular(josephine) -> not Erroneous(josephine)\nforall x (Addlepated(x) -> Erroneous(x))\n\nnot Cryonic(pippy)\n\ntherefore Cryonic(pippy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Cosmo is charged. Theodosia is not xlviii. Agathe is not mortgaged. Lizette is thespian. Cold things are assistant. If Agathe is beneficent then Agathe is not mortgaged. Young things are mortgaged. Cosmo is mortgaged.", "logic": "\nCharged(cosmo)\nnot Xlviii(theodosia)\nnot Mortgaged(agathe)\nThespian(lizette)\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Assistant(x))\nBeneficent(agathe) -> not Mortgaged(agathe)\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\n\nMortgaged(cosmo)\n\nCharged(cosmo) and forall x (Charged(x) -> Mortgaged(x)) -> therefore Mortgaged(cosmo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Eydie is landlocked. Jolee is not trilobed. Thain is not albanian. Kane is rare. Cold things are micropylar. If Thain is phlegmy then Thain is not albanian. Young things are albanian. Eydie is not albanian.", "logic": "\nLandlocked(eydie)\nnot Trilobed(jolee)\nnot Albanian(thain)\nRare(kane)\nforall x (Albanian(x) -> Micropylar(x))\nPhlegmy(thain) -> not Albanian(thain)\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Albanian(x))\n\nnot Albanian(eydie)\n\nLandlocked(eydie) and forall x (Landlocked(x) -> Albanian(x)) -> therefore Albanian(eydie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Wallis is sulfurous. Thatch is not bellyless. Odin is not impartial. Anatoly is umbrageous. Cold things are myopic. If Odin is diseased then Odin is not impartial. Young things are impartial. Wallis is myopic.", "logic": "\nSulfurous(wallis)\nnot Bellyless(thatch)\nnot Impartial(odin)\nUmbrageous(anatoly)\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Myopic(x))\nDiseased(odin) -> not Impartial(odin)\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Impartial(x))\n\nMyopic(wallis)\n\nSulfurous(wallis) and forall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Impartial(x)) -> therefore Impartial(wallis) Impartial(wallis) and forall x (Impartial(x) -> Myopic(x)) -> therefore Myopic(wallis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Adrianna is cytotoxic. Stefa is not avocado. Matthaeus is not perfumed. Joella is rupicolous. Cold things are alternate. If Matthaeus is alfresco then Matthaeus is not perfumed. Young things are perfumed. Adrianna is not alternate.", "logic": "\nCytotoxic(adrianna)\nnot Avocado(stefa)\nnot Perfumed(matthaeus)\nRupicolous(joella)\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Alternate(x))\nAlfresco(matthaeus) -> not Perfumed(matthaeus)\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Perfumed(x))\n\nnot Alternate(adrianna)\n\nCytotoxic(adrianna) and forall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Perfumed(x)) -> therefore Perfumed(adrianna) Perfumed(adrianna) and forall x (Perfumed(x) -> Alternate(x)) -> therefore Alternate(adrianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Willard is mated. Maryann is not asteroid. Willie is not inert. Davin is gibbose. Cold things are cesarean. If Willie is reviving then Willie is not inert. Young things are inert. Maryann is not cesarean.", "logic": "\nMated(willard)\nnot Asteroid(maryann)\nnot Inert(willie)\nGibbose(davin)\nforall x (Inert(x) -> Cesarean(x))\nReviving(willie) -> not Inert(willie)\nforall x (Mated(x) -> Inert(x))\n\nnot Cesarean(maryann)\n\nforall x (Inert(x) -> Cesarean(x)) <- forall x (Mated(x) -> Inert(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Husein is begotten. Bee is not hungarian. Forester is not bregmatic. Linette is marauding. Cold things are unmourned. If Forester is delusive then Forester is not bregmatic. Young things are bregmatic. Linette is unmourned.", "logic": "\nBegotten(husein)\nnot Hungarian(bee)\nnot Bregmatic(forester)\nMarauding(linette)\nforall x (Bregmatic(x) -> Unmourned(x))\nDelusive(forester) -> not Bregmatic(forester)\nforall x (Begotten(x) -> Bregmatic(x))\n\nUnmourned(linette)\n\nforall x (Bregmatic(x) -> Unmourned(x)) <- forall x (Begotten(x) -> Bregmatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Zonda is unlikely. Rik is not supervised. Giffie is not shitty. Bearnard is mutualist. Cold things are galilean. If Giffie is refreshing then Giffie is not shitty. Young things are shitty. Giffie is not galilean.", "logic": "\nUnlikely(zonda)\nnot Supervised(rik)\nnot Shitty(giffie)\nMutualist(bearnard)\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Galilean(x))\nRefreshing(giffie) -> not Shitty(giffie)\nforall x (Unlikely(x) -> Shitty(x))\n\nnot Galilean(giffie)\n\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Galilean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Erica is absorbable. Raul is not tautologic. Josh is not admittable. Teddie is greater. Cold things are catatonic. If Josh is sandaled then Josh is not admittable. Young things are admittable. Josh is tautologic.", "logic": "\nAbsorbable(erica)\nnot Tautologic(raul)\nnot Admittable(josh)\nGreater(teddie)\nforall x (Admittable(x) -> Catatonic(x))\nSandaled(josh) -> not Admittable(josh)\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Admittable(x))\n\nTautologic(josh)\n\nTautologic(josh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Florian is runny. Sharon is not raffish. Adam is not approving. Gussi is touchy. Cold things are duplicate. If Adam is arching then Adam is not approving. Young things are approving. Adam is not arching.", "logic": "\nRunny(florian)\nnot Raffish(sharon)\nnot Approving(adam)\nTouchy(gussi)\nforall x (Approving(x) -> Duplicate(x))\nArching(adam) -> not Approving(adam)\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Approving(x))\n\nnot Arching(adam)\n\nnot Arching(adam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Bertram is wild. Raychel is not binocular. Margit is not variform. Marlowe is neoclassic. Cold things are obligated. If Margit is chintzy then Margit is not variform. Young things are variform. Bertram is chintzy.", "logic": "\nWild(bertram)\nnot Binocular(raychel)\nnot Variform(margit)\nNeoclassic(marlowe)\nforall x (Variform(x) -> Obligated(x))\nChintzy(margit) -> not Variform(margit)\nforall x (Wild(x) -> Variform(x))\n\nChintzy(bertram)\n\nChintzy(bertram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "The luther overstock the quigman. The luther is phenotypic. The luther is heedful. The luther is sparing. The luther route the quigman. The luther gesture the quigman. The quigman overstock the luther. The quigman is heedful. The quigman route the luther. The quigman gesture the luther. If something overstock the luther and the luther overstock the quigman then the quigman overstock the luther. If something route the quigman and the quigman overstock the luther then it overstock the quigman. If something gesture the luther then it route the quigman. If something is heedful and phenotypic then it gesture the quigman. If something overstock the quigman then it is phenotypic. If the quigman route the luther and the quigman is not phenotypic then the luther is upstream. The quigman route the luther.", "logic": "\nOverstock(luther, quigman)\nPhenotypic(luther)\nHeedful(luther)\nSparing(luther)\nRoute(luther, quigman)\nGesture(luther, quigman)\nOverstock(quigman, luther)\nHeedful(quigman)\nRoute(quigman, luther)\nGesture(quigman, luther)\nforall x (Overstock(x, luther) and Overstock(luther, quigman) -> Overstock(quigman, luther))\nforall x (Route(x, quigman) and Overstock(quigman, luther) -> Overstock(x, quigman))\nforall x (Gesture(x, luther) -> Route(x, quigman))\nforall x (Heedful(x) and Phenotypic(x) -> Gesture(x, quigman))\nforall x (Overstock(x, quigman) -> Phenotypic(x))\nRoute(quigman, luther) and not Phenotypic(quigman) -> Upstream(luther)\n\nRoute(quigman, luther)\n\ntherefore Route(quigman, luther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The waylin segregate the yvette. The waylin is rickety. The waylin is abject. The waylin is admissible. The waylin tickle the yvette. The waylin swag the yvette. The yvette segregate the waylin. The yvette is abject. The yvette tickle the waylin. The yvette swag the waylin. If something segregate the waylin and the waylin segregate the yvette then the yvette segregate the waylin. If something tickle the yvette and the yvette segregate the waylin then it segregate the yvette. If something swag the waylin then it tickle the yvette. If something is abject and rickety then it swag the yvette. If something segregate the yvette then it is rickety. If the yvette tickle the waylin and the yvette is not rickety then the waylin is scarred. The yvette does not need the waylin.", "logic": "\nSegregate(waylin, yvette)\nRickety(waylin)\nAbject(waylin)\nAdmissible(waylin)\nTickle(waylin, yvette)\nSwag(waylin, yvette)\nSegregate(yvette, waylin)\nAbject(yvette)\nTickle(yvette, waylin)\nSwag(yvette, waylin)\nforall x (Segregate(x, waylin) and Segregate(waylin, yvette) -> Segregate(yvette, waylin))\nforall x (Tickle(x, yvette) and Segregate(yvette, waylin) -> Segregate(x, yvette))\nforall x (Swag(x, waylin) -> Tickle(x, yvette))\nforall x (Abject(x) and Rickety(x) -> Swag(x, yvette))\nforall x (Segregate(x, yvette) -> Rickety(x))\nTickle(yvette, waylin) and not Rickety(yvette) -> Scarred(waylin)\n\nnot Tickle(yvette, waylin)\n\ntherefore Tickle(yvette, waylin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The aurea model the shayne. The aurea is abyssal. The aurea is appendant. The aurea is existing. The aurea chastise the shayne. The aurea opalise the shayne. The shayne model the aurea. The shayne is appendant. The shayne chastise the aurea. The shayne opalise the aurea. If something model the aurea and the aurea model the shayne then the shayne model the aurea. If something chastise the shayne and the shayne model the aurea then it model the shayne. If something opalise the aurea then it chastise the shayne. If something is appendant and abyssal then it opalise the shayne. If something model the shayne then it is abyssal. If the shayne chastise the aurea and the shayne is not abyssal then the aurea is amoeban. The shayne chastise the shayne.", "logic": "\nModel(aurea, shayne)\nAbyssal(aurea)\nAppendant(aurea)\nExisting(aurea)\nChastise(aurea, shayne)\nOpalise(aurea, shayne)\nModel(shayne, aurea)\nAppendant(shayne)\nChastise(shayne, aurea)\nOpalise(shayne, aurea)\nforall x (Model(x, aurea) and Model(aurea, shayne) -> Model(shayne, aurea))\nforall x (Chastise(x, shayne) and Model(shayne, aurea) -> Model(x, shayne))\nforall x (Opalise(x, aurea) -> Chastise(x, shayne))\nforall x (Appendant(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Opalise(x, shayne))\nforall x (Model(x, shayne) -> Abyssal(x))\nChastise(shayne, aurea) and not Abyssal(shayne) -> Amoeban(aurea)\n\nChastise(shayne, shayne)\n\nOpalise(shayne, aurea) and forall x (Opalise(x, aurea) -> Chastise(x, shayne)) -> therefore Chastise(shayne, shayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The susana scend the trudie. The susana is straight. The susana is accidental. The susana is vaporific. The susana quell the trudie. The susana unearth the trudie. The trudie scend the susana. The trudie is accidental. The trudie quell the susana. The trudie unearth the susana. If something scend the susana and the susana scend the trudie then the trudie scend the susana. If something quell the trudie and the trudie scend the susana then it scend the trudie. If something unearth the susana then it quell the trudie. If something is accidental and straight then it unearth the trudie. If something scend the trudie then it is straight. If the trudie quell the susana and the trudie is not straight then the susana is pureblood. The trudie does not need the trudie.", "logic": "\nScend(susana, trudie)\nStraight(susana)\nAccidental(susana)\nVaporific(susana)\nQuell(susana, trudie)\nUnearth(susana, trudie)\nScend(trudie, susana)\nAccidental(trudie)\nQuell(trudie, susana)\nUnearth(trudie, susana)\nforall x (Scend(x, susana) and Scend(susana, trudie) -> Scend(trudie, susana))\nforall x (Quell(x, trudie) and Scend(trudie, susana) -> Scend(x, trudie))\nforall x (Unearth(x, susana) -> Quell(x, trudie))\nforall x (Accidental(x) and Straight(x) -> Unearth(x, trudie))\nforall x (Scend(x, trudie) -> Straight(x))\nQuell(trudie, susana) and not Straight(trudie) -> Pureblood(susana)\n\nnot Quell(trudie, trudie)\n\nUnearth(trudie, susana) and forall x (Unearth(x, susana) -> Quell(x, trudie)) -> therefore Quell(trudie, trudie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The valli swarm the judas. The valli is precocial. The valli is extramural. The valli is appetitive. The valli disconnect the judas. The valli french the judas. The judas swarm the valli. The judas is extramural. The judas disconnect the valli. The judas french the valli. If something swarm the valli and the valli swarm the judas then the judas swarm the valli. If something disconnect the judas and the judas swarm the valli then it swarm the judas. If something french the valli then it disconnect the judas. If something is extramural and precocial then it french the judas. If something swarm the judas then it is precocial. If the judas disconnect the valli and the judas is not precocial then the valli is merciless. The judas swarm the judas.", "logic": "\nSwarm(valli, judas)\nPrecocial(valli)\nExtramural(valli)\nAppetitive(valli)\nDisconnect(valli, judas)\nFrench(valli, judas)\nSwarm(judas, valli)\nExtramural(judas)\nDisconnect(judas, valli)\nFrench(judas, valli)\nforall x (Swarm(x, valli) and Swarm(valli, judas) -> Swarm(judas, valli))\nforall x (Disconnect(x, judas) and Swarm(judas, valli) -> Swarm(x, judas))\nforall x (French(x, valli) -> Disconnect(x, judas))\nforall x (Extramural(x) and Precocial(x) -> French(x, judas))\nforall x (Swarm(x, judas) -> Precocial(x))\nDisconnect(judas, valli) and not Precocial(judas) -> Merciless(valli)\n\nSwarm(judas, judas)\n\nFrench(judas, valli) and forall x (French(x, valli) -> Disconnect(x, judas)) -> therefore Disconnect(judas, judas) Disconnect(judas, judas) and Swarm(judas, valli) and forall x (Disconnect(x, judas) and Swarm(judas, valli) -> Swarm(x, judas)) -> therefore Swarm(judas, judas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The lamb freak the anjela. The lamb is ossiferous. The lamb is caducous. The lamb is laughing. The lamb flutter the anjela. The lamb defer the anjela. The anjela freak the lamb. The anjela is caducous. The anjela flutter the lamb. The anjela defer the lamb. If something freak the lamb and the lamb freak the anjela then the anjela freak the lamb. If something flutter the anjela and the anjela freak the lamb then it freak the anjela. If something defer the lamb then it flutter the anjela. If something is caducous and ossiferous then it defer the anjela. If something freak the anjela then it is ossiferous. If the anjela flutter the lamb and the anjela is not ossiferous then the lamb is smothering. The anjela does not eat the anjela.", "logic": "\nFreak(lamb, anjela)\nOssiferous(lamb)\nCaducous(lamb)\nLaughing(lamb)\nFlutter(lamb, anjela)\nDefer(lamb, anjela)\nFreak(anjela, lamb)\nCaducous(anjela)\nFlutter(anjela, lamb)\nDefer(anjela, lamb)\nforall x (Freak(x, lamb) and Freak(lamb, anjela) -> Freak(anjela, lamb))\nforall x (Flutter(x, anjela) and Freak(anjela, lamb) -> Freak(x, anjela))\nforall x (Defer(x, lamb) -> Flutter(x, anjela))\nforall x (Caducous(x) and Ossiferous(x) -> Defer(x, anjela))\nforall x (Freak(x, anjela) -> Ossiferous(x))\nFlutter(anjela, lamb) and not Ossiferous(anjela) -> Smothering(lamb)\n\nnot Freak(anjela, anjela)\n\nDefer(anjela, lamb) and forall x (Defer(x, lamb) -> Flutter(x, anjela)) -> therefore Flutter(anjela, anjela) Flutter(anjela, anjela) and Freak(anjela, lamb) and forall x (Flutter(x, anjela) and Freak(anjela, lamb) -> Freak(x, anjela)) -> therefore Freak(anjela, anjela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The aguste imprecate the ramesh. The aguste is intragroup. The aguste is edematous. The aguste is perianal. The aguste release the ramesh. The aguste photograph the ramesh. The ramesh imprecate the aguste. The ramesh is edematous. The ramesh release the aguste. The ramesh photograph the aguste. If something imprecate the aguste and the aguste imprecate the ramesh then the ramesh imprecate the aguste. If something release the ramesh and the ramesh imprecate the aguste then it imprecate the ramesh. If something photograph the aguste then it release the ramesh. If something is edematous and intragroup then it photograph the ramesh. If something imprecate the ramesh then it is intragroup. If the ramesh release the aguste and the ramesh is not intragroup then the aguste is metallic. The aguste is not metallic.", "logic": "\nImprecate(aguste, ramesh)\nIntragroup(aguste)\nEdematous(aguste)\nPerianal(aguste)\nRelease(aguste, ramesh)\nPhotograph(aguste, ramesh)\nImprecate(ramesh, aguste)\nEdematous(ramesh)\nRelease(ramesh, aguste)\nPhotograph(ramesh, aguste)\nforall x (Imprecate(x, aguste) and Imprecate(aguste, ramesh) -> Imprecate(ramesh, aguste))\nforall x (Release(x, ramesh) and Imprecate(ramesh, aguste) -> Imprecate(x, ramesh))\nforall x (Photograph(x, aguste) -> Release(x, ramesh))\nforall x (Edematous(x) and Intragroup(x) -> Photograph(x, ramesh))\nforall x (Imprecate(x, ramesh) -> Intragroup(x))\nRelease(ramesh, aguste) and not Intragroup(ramesh) -> Metallic(aguste)\n\nnot Metallic(aguste)\n\nRelease(ramesh, aguste) and not Intragroup(ramesh) -> Metallic(aguste) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The edsel crumble the letitia. The edsel is cognizable. The edsel is puzzled. The edsel is wormy. The edsel dehorn the letitia. The edsel skunk the letitia. The letitia crumble the edsel. The letitia is puzzled. The letitia dehorn the edsel. The letitia skunk the edsel. If something crumble the edsel and the edsel crumble the letitia then the letitia crumble the edsel. If something dehorn the letitia and the letitia crumble the edsel then it crumble the letitia. If something skunk the edsel then it dehorn the letitia. If something is puzzled and cognizable then it skunk the letitia. If something crumble the letitia then it is cognizable. If the letitia dehorn the edsel and the letitia is not cognizable then the edsel is onerous. The edsel crumble the edsel.", "logic": "\nCrumble(edsel, letitia)\nCognizable(edsel)\nPuzzled(edsel)\nWormy(edsel)\nDehorn(edsel, letitia)\nSkunk(edsel, letitia)\nCrumble(letitia, edsel)\nPuzzled(letitia)\nDehorn(letitia, edsel)\nSkunk(letitia, edsel)\nforall x (Crumble(x, edsel) and Crumble(edsel, letitia) -> Crumble(letitia, edsel))\nforall x (Dehorn(x, letitia) and Crumble(letitia, edsel) -> Crumble(x, letitia))\nforall x (Skunk(x, edsel) -> Dehorn(x, letitia))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) and Cognizable(x) -> Skunk(x, letitia))\nforall x (Crumble(x, letitia) -> Cognizable(x))\nDehorn(letitia, edsel) and not Cognizable(letitia) -> Onerous(edsel)\n\nCrumble(edsel, edsel)\n\nCrumble(edsel, edsel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The randolf foal the elmore. The randolf is spongy. The randolf is maggoty. The randolf is semisweet. The randolf disrupt the elmore. The randolf unclog the elmore. The elmore foal the randolf. The elmore is maggoty. The elmore disrupt the randolf. The elmore unclog the randolf. If something foal the randolf and the randolf foal the elmore then the elmore foal the randolf. If something disrupt the elmore and the elmore foal the randolf then it foal the elmore. If something unclog the randolf then it disrupt the elmore. If something is maggoty and spongy then it unclog the elmore. If something foal the elmore then it is spongy. If the elmore disrupt the randolf and the elmore is not spongy then the randolf is greyish. The randolf is not cold.", "logic": "\nFoal(randolf, elmore)\nSpongy(randolf)\nMaggoty(randolf)\nSemisweet(randolf)\nDisrupt(randolf, elmore)\nUnclog(randolf, elmore)\nFoal(elmore, randolf)\nMaggoty(elmore)\nDisrupt(elmore, randolf)\nUnclog(elmore, randolf)\nforall x (Foal(x, randolf) and Foal(randolf, elmore) -> Foal(elmore, randolf))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, elmore) and Foal(elmore, randolf) -> Foal(x, elmore))\nforall x (Unclog(x, randolf) -> Disrupt(x, elmore))\nforall x (Maggoty(x) and Spongy(x) -> Unclog(x, elmore))\nforall x (Foal(x, elmore) -> Spongy(x))\nDisrupt(elmore, randolf) and not Spongy(elmore) -> Greyish(randolf)\n\nnot Cold(randolf)\n\nnot Cold(randolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The ellyn shrivel the cathrine. The ellyn is inadequate. The ellyn is unifying. The ellyn is fluffy. The ellyn depone the cathrine. The ellyn prefigure the cathrine. The cathrine shrivel the ellyn. The cathrine is unifying. The cathrine depone the ellyn. The cathrine prefigure the ellyn. If something shrivel the ellyn and the ellyn shrivel the cathrine then the cathrine shrivel the ellyn. If something depone the cathrine and the cathrine shrivel the ellyn then it shrivel the cathrine. If something prefigure the ellyn then it depone the cathrine. If something is unifying and inadequate then it prefigure the cathrine. If something shrivel the cathrine then it is inadequate. If the cathrine depone the ellyn and the cathrine is not inadequate then the ellyn is redemptory. The cathrine is cold.", "logic": "\nShrivel(ellyn, cathrine)\nInadequate(ellyn)\nUnifying(ellyn)\nFluffy(ellyn)\nDepone(ellyn, cathrine)\nPrefigure(ellyn, cathrine)\nShrivel(cathrine, ellyn)\nUnifying(cathrine)\nDepone(cathrine, ellyn)\nPrefigure(cathrine, ellyn)\nforall x (Shrivel(x, ellyn) and Shrivel(ellyn, cathrine) -> Shrivel(cathrine, ellyn))\nforall x (Depone(x, cathrine) and Shrivel(cathrine, ellyn) -> Shrivel(x, cathrine))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, ellyn) -> Depone(x, cathrine))\nforall x (Unifying(x) and Inadequate(x) -> Prefigure(x, cathrine))\nforall x (Shrivel(x, cathrine) -> Inadequate(x))\nDepone(cathrine, ellyn) and not Inadequate(cathrine) -> Redemptory(ellyn)\n\nCold(cathrine)\n\nCold(cathrine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The randall subside the theadora. The randall is nonviscid. The randall is unparented. The randall is scheming. The randall tramp the theadora. The randall benefact the theadora. The theadora subside the randall. The theadora is unparented. The theadora tramp the randall. The theadora benefact the randall. If something subside the randall and the randall subside the theadora then the theadora subside the randall. If something tramp the theadora and the theadora subside the randall then it subside the theadora. If something benefact the randall then it tramp the theadora. If something is unparented and nonviscid then it benefact the theadora. If something subside the theadora then it is nonviscid. If the theadora tramp the randall and the theadora is not nonviscid then the randall is artesian. The randall does not need the randall.", "logic": "\nSubside(randall, theadora)\nNonviscid(randall)\nUnparented(randall)\nScheming(randall)\nTramp(randall, theadora)\nBenefact(randall, theadora)\nSubside(theadora, randall)\nUnparented(theadora)\nTramp(theadora, randall)\nBenefact(theadora, randall)\nforall x (Subside(x, randall) and Subside(randall, theadora) -> Subside(theadora, randall))\nforall x (Tramp(x, theadora) and Subside(theadora, randall) -> Subside(x, theadora))\nforall x (Benefact(x, randall) -> Tramp(x, theadora))\nforall x (Unparented(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Benefact(x, theadora))\nforall x (Subside(x, theadora) -> Nonviscid(x))\nTramp(theadora, randall) and not Nonviscid(theadora) -> Artesian(randall)\n\nnot Tramp(randall, randall)\n\nnot Tramp(randall, randall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The deanne bowdlerize the ximenez. The deanne is unsown. The deanne is croaky. The deanne is smarmy. The deanne mush the ximenez. The deanne copper the ximenez. The ximenez bowdlerize the deanne. The ximenez is croaky. The ximenez mush the deanne. The ximenez copper the deanne. If something bowdlerize the deanne and the deanne bowdlerize the ximenez then the ximenez bowdlerize the deanne. If something mush the ximenez and the ximenez bowdlerize the deanne then it bowdlerize the ximenez. If something copper the deanne then it mush the ximenez. If something is croaky and unsown then it copper the ximenez. If something bowdlerize the ximenez then it is unsown. If the ximenez mush the deanne and the ximenez is not unsown then the deanne is testy. The ximenez is smarmy.", "logic": "\nBowdlerize(deanne, ximenez)\nUnsown(deanne)\nCroaky(deanne)\nSmarmy(deanne)\nMush(deanne, ximenez)\nCopper(deanne, ximenez)\nBowdlerize(ximenez, deanne)\nCroaky(ximenez)\nMush(ximenez, deanne)\nCopper(ximenez, deanne)\nforall x (Bowdlerize(x, deanne) and Bowdlerize(deanne, ximenez) -> Bowdlerize(ximenez, deanne))\nforall x (Mush(x, ximenez) and Bowdlerize(ximenez, deanne) -> Bowdlerize(x, ximenez))\nforall x (Copper(x, deanne) -> Mush(x, ximenez))\nforall x (Croaky(x) and Unsown(x) -> Copper(x, ximenez))\nforall x (Bowdlerize(x, ximenez) -> Unsown(x))\nMush(ximenez, deanne) and not Unsown(ximenez) -> Testy(deanne)\n\nSmarmy(ximenez)\n\nSmarmy(ximenez) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-551"} {"premises": "The marillin does not chase the barnabas. The marillin edge the cindee. The marillin devaluate the cindee. The marillin samba the cindee. The barnabas does not chase the marillin. The barnabas is brainsick. The cindee devaluate the marillin. The cindee devaluate the skipp. The skipp is not synovial. The skipp samba the barnabas. If someone devaluate the cindee then the cindee samba the marillin. If someone samba the marillin then the marillin does not eat the barnabas. The marillin samba the cindee.", "logic": "\nnot Edge(marillin, barnabas)\nEdge(marillin, cindee)\nDevaluate(marillin, cindee)\nSamba(marillin, cindee)\nnot Edge(barnabas, marillin)\nBrainsick(barnabas)\nDevaluate(cindee, marillin)\nDevaluate(cindee, skipp)\nnot Synovial(skipp)\nSamba(skipp, barnabas)\nforall x (Devaluate(x, cindee) -> Samba(cindee, marillin))\nforall x (Samba(x, marillin) -> not Devaluate(marillin, barnabas))\n\nSamba(marillin, cindee)\n\ntherefore Samba(marillin, cindee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The ajay does not chase the erl. The ajay rappel the annelise. The ajay discerp the annelise. The ajay crape the annelise. The erl does not chase the ajay. The erl is tref. The annelise discerp the ajay. The annelise discerp the dickey. The dickey is not tractile. The dickey crape the erl. If someone discerp the annelise then the annelise crape the ajay. If someone crape the ajay then the ajay does not eat the erl. The erl rappel the ajay.", "logic": "\nnot Rappel(ajay, erl)\nRappel(ajay, annelise)\nDiscerp(ajay, annelise)\nCrape(ajay, annelise)\nnot Rappel(erl, ajay)\nTref(erl)\nDiscerp(annelise, ajay)\nDiscerp(annelise, dickey)\nnot Tractile(dickey)\nCrape(dickey, erl)\nforall x (Discerp(x, annelise) -> Crape(annelise, ajay))\nforall x (Crape(x, ajay) -> not Discerp(ajay, erl))\n\nRappel(erl, ajay)\n\ntherefore not Rappel(erl, ajay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The doretta does not chase the onida. The doretta forbid the eveline. The doretta backstop the eveline. The doretta demote the eveline. The onida does not chase the doretta. The onida is semisolid. The eveline backstop the doretta. The eveline backstop the phillie. The phillie is not uppercase. The phillie demote the onida. If someone backstop the eveline then the eveline demote the doretta. If someone demote the doretta then the doretta does not eat the onida. The eveline demote the doretta.", "logic": "\nnot Forbid(doretta, onida)\nForbid(doretta, eveline)\nBackstop(doretta, eveline)\nDemote(doretta, eveline)\nnot Forbid(onida, doretta)\nSemisolid(onida)\nBackstop(eveline, doretta)\nBackstop(eveline, phillie)\nnot Uppercase(phillie)\nDemote(phillie, onida)\nforall x (Backstop(x, eveline) -> Demote(eveline, doretta))\nforall x (Demote(x, doretta) -> not Backstop(doretta, onida))\n\nDemote(eveline, doretta)\n\nBackstop(doretta, eveline) and forall x (Backstop(x, eveline) -> Demote(eveline, doretta)) -> therefore Demote(eveline, doretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The zak does not chase the charmine. The zak term the willard. The zak sponsor the willard. The zak slice the willard. The charmine does not chase the zak. The charmine is cloze. The willard sponsor the zak. The willard sponsor the tibold. The tibold is not recognized. The tibold slice the charmine. If someone sponsor the willard then the willard slice the zak. If someone slice the zak then the zak does not eat the charmine. The willard does not need the zak.", "logic": "\nnot Term(zak, charmine)\nTerm(zak, willard)\nSponsor(zak, willard)\nSlice(zak, willard)\nnot Term(charmine, zak)\nCloze(charmine)\nSponsor(willard, zak)\nSponsor(willard, tibold)\nnot Recognized(tibold)\nSlice(tibold, charmine)\nforall x (Sponsor(x, willard) -> Slice(willard, zak))\nforall x (Slice(x, zak) -> not Sponsor(zak, charmine))\n\nnot Slice(willard, zak)\n\nSponsor(zak, willard) and forall x (Sponsor(x, willard) -> Slice(willard, zak)) -> therefore Slice(willard, zak)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The calypso does not chase the jeffie. The calypso guide the cyril. The calypso quaff the cyril. The calypso flocculate the cyril. The jeffie does not chase the calypso. The jeffie is morganatic. The cyril quaff the calypso. The cyril quaff the chance. The chance is not mirrorlike. The chance flocculate the jeffie. If someone quaff the cyril then the cyril flocculate the calypso. If someone flocculate the calypso then the calypso does not eat the jeffie. The calypso does not eat the jeffie.", "logic": "\nnot Guide(calypso, jeffie)\nGuide(calypso, cyril)\nQuaff(calypso, cyril)\nFlocculate(calypso, cyril)\nnot Guide(jeffie, calypso)\nMorganatic(jeffie)\nQuaff(cyril, calypso)\nQuaff(cyril, chance)\nnot Mirrorlike(chance)\nFlocculate(chance, jeffie)\nforall x (Quaff(x, cyril) -> Flocculate(cyril, calypso))\nforall x (Flocculate(x, calypso) -> not Quaff(calypso, jeffie))\n\nnot Quaff(calypso, jeffie)\n\nQuaff(calypso, cyril) and forall x (Quaff(x, cyril) -> Flocculate(cyril, calypso)) -> therefore Flocculate(cyril, calypso) Flocculate(cyril, calypso) and forall x (Flocculate(x, calypso) -> not Quaff(calypso, jeffie)) -> therefore not Quaff(calypso, jeffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The peg does not chase the monah. The peg detract the angelle. The peg vitalize the angelle. The peg claim the angelle. The monah does not chase the peg. The monah is anorectal. The angelle vitalize the peg. The angelle vitalize the damaris. The damaris is not blebby. The damaris claim the monah. If someone vitalize the angelle then the angelle claim the peg. If someone claim the peg then the peg does not eat the monah. The peg vitalize the monah.", "logic": "\nnot Detract(peg, monah)\nDetract(peg, angelle)\nVitalize(peg, angelle)\nClaim(peg, angelle)\nnot Detract(monah, peg)\nAnorectal(monah)\nVitalize(angelle, peg)\nVitalize(angelle, damaris)\nnot Blebby(damaris)\nClaim(damaris, monah)\nforall x (Vitalize(x, angelle) -> Claim(angelle, peg))\nforall x (Claim(x, peg) -> not Vitalize(peg, monah))\n\nVitalize(peg, monah)\n\nVitalize(peg, angelle) and forall x (Vitalize(x, angelle) -> Claim(angelle, peg)) -> therefore Claim(angelle, peg) Claim(angelle, peg) and forall x (Claim(x, peg) -> not Vitalize(peg, monah)) -> therefore not Vitalize(peg, monah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The haleigh does not chase the gredel. The haleigh inventory the pace. The haleigh inlay the pace. The haleigh translate the pace. The gredel does not chase the haleigh. The gredel is praiseful. The pace inlay the haleigh. The pace inlay the leshia. The leshia is not buckshee. The leshia translate the gredel. If someone inlay the pace then the pace translate the haleigh. If someone translate the haleigh then the haleigh does not eat the gredel. The leshia is not praiseful.", "logic": "\nnot Inventory(haleigh, gredel)\nInventory(haleigh, pace)\nInlay(haleigh, pace)\nTranslate(haleigh, pace)\nnot Inventory(gredel, haleigh)\nPraiseful(gredel)\nInlay(pace, haleigh)\nInlay(pace, leshia)\nnot Buckshee(leshia)\nTranslate(leshia, gredel)\nforall x (Inlay(x, pace) -> Translate(pace, haleigh))\nforall x (Translate(x, haleigh) -> not Inlay(haleigh, gredel))\n\nnot Praiseful(leshia)\n\nnot Praiseful(leshia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The connolly does not chase the anselma. The connolly evanesce the katrina. The connolly blueprint the katrina. The connolly muddle the katrina. The anselma does not chase the connolly. The anselma is blinded. The katrina blueprint the connolly. The katrina blueprint the paulo. The paulo is not womanly. The paulo muddle the anselma. If someone blueprint the katrina then the katrina muddle the connolly. If someone muddle the connolly then the connolly does not eat the anselma. The paulo muddle the connolly.", "logic": "\nnot Evanesce(connolly, anselma)\nEvanesce(connolly, katrina)\nBlueprint(connolly, katrina)\nMuddle(connolly, katrina)\nnot Evanesce(anselma, connolly)\nBlinded(anselma)\nBlueprint(katrina, connolly)\nBlueprint(katrina, paulo)\nnot Womanly(paulo)\nMuddle(paulo, anselma)\nforall x (Blueprint(x, katrina) -> Muddle(katrina, connolly))\nforall x (Muddle(x, connolly) -> not Blueprint(connolly, anselma))\n\nMuddle(paulo, connolly)\n\nMuddle(paulo, connolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The cindra does not chase the winnah. The cindra suborn the linette. The cindra remind the linette. The cindra fruit the linette. The winnah does not chase the cindra. The winnah is assumptive. The linette remind the cindra. The linette remind the kostas. The kostas is not assiduous. The kostas fruit the winnah. If someone remind the linette then the linette fruit the cindra. If someone fruit the cindra then the cindra does not eat the winnah. The winnah does not chase the winnah.", "logic": "\nnot Suborn(cindra, winnah)\nSuborn(cindra, linette)\nRemind(cindra, linette)\nFruit(cindra, linette)\nnot Suborn(winnah, cindra)\nAssumptive(winnah)\nRemind(linette, cindra)\nRemind(linette, kostas)\nnot Assiduous(kostas)\nFruit(kostas, winnah)\nforall x (Remind(x, linette) -> Fruit(linette, cindra))\nforall x (Fruit(x, cindra) -> not Remind(cindra, winnah))\n\nnot Suborn(winnah, winnah)\n\nnot Suborn(winnah, winnah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The delinda does not chase the selinda. The delinda fantasize the garvin. The delinda citrate the garvin. The delinda cartoon the garvin. The selinda does not chase the delinda. The selinda is guided. The garvin citrate the delinda. The garvin citrate the gracia. The gracia is not definite. The gracia cartoon the selinda. If someone citrate the garvin then the garvin cartoon the delinda. If someone cartoon the delinda then the delinda does not eat the selinda. The delinda is definite.", "logic": "\nnot Fantasize(delinda, selinda)\nFantasize(delinda, garvin)\nCitrate(delinda, garvin)\nCartoon(delinda, garvin)\nnot Fantasize(selinda, delinda)\nGuided(selinda)\nCitrate(garvin, delinda)\nCitrate(garvin, gracia)\nnot Definite(gracia)\nCartoon(gracia, selinda)\nforall x (Citrate(x, garvin) -> Cartoon(garvin, delinda))\nforall x (Cartoon(x, delinda) -> not Citrate(delinda, selinda))\n\nDefinite(delinda)\n\nDefinite(delinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The pate does not chase the olia. The pate trivialize the kathy. The pate whelp the kathy. The pate disco the kathy. The olia does not chase the pate. The olia is hazy. The kathy whelp the pate. The kathy whelp the rhona. The rhona is not copular. The rhona disco the olia. If someone whelp the kathy then the kathy disco the pate. If someone disco the pate then the pate does not eat the olia. The pate does not chase the rhona.", "logic": "\nnot Trivialize(pate, olia)\nTrivialize(pate, kathy)\nWhelp(pate, kathy)\nDisco(pate, kathy)\nnot Trivialize(olia, pate)\nHazy(olia)\nWhelp(kathy, pate)\nWhelp(kathy, rhona)\nnot Copular(rhona)\nDisco(rhona, olia)\nforall x (Whelp(x, kathy) -> Disco(kathy, pate))\nforall x (Disco(x, pate) -> not Whelp(pate, olia))\n\nnot Trivialize(pate, rhona)\n\nnot Trivialize(pate, rhona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "The hedi does not chase the rubina. The hedi barde the diandra. The hedi step the diandra. The hedi beak the diandra. The rubina does not chase the hedi. The rubina is beetle. The diandra step the hedi. The diandra step the kriste. The kriste is not abasic. The kriste beak the rubina. If someone step the diandra then the diandra beak the hedi. If someone beak the hedi then the hedi does not eat the rubina. The rubina beak the diandra.", "logic": "\nnot Barde(hedi, rubina)\nBarde(hedi, diandra)\nStep(hedi, diandra)\nBeak(hedi, diandra)\nnot Barde(rubina, hedi)\nBeetle(rubina)\nStep(diandra, hedi)\nStep(diandra, kriste)\nnot Abasic(kriste)\nBeak(kriste, rubina)\nforall x (Step(x, diandra) -> Beak(diandra, hedi))\nforall x (Beak(x, hedi) -> not Step(hedi, rubina))\n\nBeak(rubina, diandra)\n\nBeak(rubina, diandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1098"} {"premises": "Kellen is scrotal. Isaak is not sounding. Wren is neuromotor. All scrotal, blushful people are anechoic. All blushful, scrotal people are anechoic. If Kellen is sounding and Kellen is anechoic then Kellen is neuromotor. If someone is scrotal then they are blushful. If someone is scrotal then they are not sounding. If Kellen is anechoic then Kellen is blushful. Kellen is scrotal.", "logic": "\nScrotal(kellen)\nnot Sounding(isaak)\nNeuromotor(wren)\nforall x (Scrotal(x) and Blushful(x) -> Anechoic(x))\nforall x (Blushful(x) and Scrotal(x) -> Anechoic(x))\nSounding(kellen) and Anechoic(kellen) -> Neuromotor(kellen)\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> Blushful(x))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> not Sounding(x))\nAnechoic(kellen) -> Blushful(kellen)\n\nScrotal(kellen)\n\ntherefore Scrotal(kellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Davine is balding. Raquela is not fizzy. Elliot is timorous. All balding, uraemic people are rocklike. All uraemic, balding people are rocklike. If Davine is fizzy and Davine is rocklike then Davine is timorous. If someone is balding then they are uraemic. If someone is balding then they are not fizzy. If Davine is rocklike then Davine is uraemic. Davine is not balding.", "logic": "\nBalding(davine)\nnot Fizzy(raquela)\nTimorous(elliot)\nforall x (Balding(x) and Uraemic(x) -> Rocklike(x))\nforall x (Uraemic(x) and Balding(x) -> Rocklike(x))\nFizzy(davine) and Rocklike(davine) -> Timorous(davine)\nforall x (Balding(x) -> Uraemic(x))\nforall x (Balding(x) -> not Fizzy(x))\nRocklike(davine) -> Uraemic(davine)\n\nnot Balding(davine)\n\ntherefore Balding(davine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Ellen is grammatic. Ilsa is not jesting. Ella is spineless. All grammatic, flip people are nutbrown. All flip, grammatic people are nutbrown. If Ellen is jesting and Ellen is nutbrown then Ellen is spineless. If someone is grammatic then they are flip. If someone is grammatic then they are not jesting. If Ellen is nutbrown then Ellen is flip. Ellen is flip.", "logic": "\nGrammatic(ellen)\nnot Jesting(ilsa)\nSpineless(ella)\nforall x (Grammatic(x) and Flip(x) -> Nutbrown(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) and Grammatic(x) -> Nutbrown(x))\nJesting(ellen) and Nutbrown(ellen) -> Spineless(ellen)\nforall x (Grammatic(x) -> Flip(x))\nforall x (Grammatic(x) -> not Jesting(x))\nNutbrown(ellen) -> Flip(ellen)\n\nFlip(ellen)\n\nGrammatic(ellen) and forall x (Grammatic(x) -> Flip(x)) -> therefore Flip(ellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Polly is quavering. Torrence is not sociable. Merl is undrawn. All quavering, hebrew people are allegretto. All hebrew, quavering people are allegretto. If Polly is sociable and Polly is allegretto then Polly is undrawn. If someone is quavering then they are hebrew. If someone is quavering then they are not sociable. If Polly is allegretto then Polly is hebrew. Polly is not hebrew.", "logic": "\nQuavering(polly)\nnot Sociable(torrence)\nUndrawn(merl)\nforall x (Quavering(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Allegretto(x))\nforall x (Hebrew(x) and Quavering(x) -> Allegretto(x))\nSociable(polly) and Allegretto(polly) -> Undrawn(polly)\nforall x (Quavering(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nforall x (Quavering(x) -> not Sociable(x))\nAllegretto(polly) -> Hebrew(polly)\n\nnot Hebrew(polly)\n\nQuavering(polly) and forall x (Quavering(x) -> Hebrew(x)) -> therefore Hebrew(polly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Willard is cloddish. Roze is not affiliated. Katya is unsporting. All cloddish, aberdonian people are unitarian. All aberdonian, cloddish people are unitarian. If Willard is affiliated and Willard is unitarian then Willard is unsporting. If someone is cloddish then they are aberdonian. If someone is cloddish then they are not affiliated. If Willard is unitarian then Willard is aberdonian. Willard is unitarian.", "logic": "\nCloddish(willard)\nnot Affiliated(roze)\nUnsporting(katya)\nforall x (Cloddish(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) and Cloddish(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nAffiliated(willard) and Unitarian(willard) -> Unsporting(willard)\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> not Affiliated(x))\nUnitarian(willard) -> Aberdonian(willard)\n\nUnitarian(willard)\n\nCloddish(willard) and forall x (Cloddish(x) -> Aberdonian(x)) -> therefore Aberdonian(willard) Cloddish(willard) and Aberdonian(willard) and forall x (Cloddish(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Unitarian(x)) -> therefore Unitarian(willard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Harrietta is delicious. Celisse is not enfeebling. Camala is causeless. All delicious, identical people are dicky. All identical, delicious people are dicky. If Harrietta is enfeebling and Harrietta is dicky then Harrietta is causeless. If someone is delicious then they are identical. If someone is delicious then they are not enfeebling. If Harrietta is dicky then Harrietta is identical. Harrietta is not dicky.", "logic": "\nDelicious(harrietta)\nnot Enfeebling(celisse)\nCauseless(camala)\nforall x (Delicious(x) and Identical(x) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Identical(x) and Delicious(x) -> Dicky(x))\nEnfeebling(harrietta) and Dicky(harrietta) -> Causeless(harrietta)\nforall x (Delicious(x) -> Identical(x))\nforall x (Delicious(x) -> not Enfeebling(x))\nDicky(harrietta) -> Identical(harrietta)\n\nnot Dicky(harrietta)\n\nDelicious(harrietta) and forall x (Delicious(x) -> Identical(x)) -> therefore Identical(harrietta) Delicious(harrietta) and Identical(harrietta) and forall x (Delicious(x) and Identical(x) -> Dicky(x)) -> therefore Dicky(harrietta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Giraud is terminable. Harris is not congested. Talya is gaumless. All terminable, acinic people are terminal. All acinic, terminable people are terminal. If Giraud is congested and Giraud is terminal then Giraud is gaumless. If someone is terminable then they are acinic. If someone is terminable then they are not congested. If Giraud is terminal then Giraud is acinic. Talya is not terminal.", "logic": "\nTerminable(giraud)\nnot Congested(harris)\nGaumless(talya)\nforall x (Terminable(x) and Acinic(x) -> Terminal(x))\nforall x (Acinic(x) and Terminable(x) -> Terminal(x))\nCongested(giraud) and Terminal(giraud) -> Gaumless(giraud)\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Acinic(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> not Congested(x))\nTerminal(giraud) -> Acinic(giraud)\n\nnot Terminal(talya)\n\nforall x (Terminable(x) and Acinic(x) -> Terminal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Worden is monopteral. Gavra is not cationic. Benni is pustulate. All monopteral, metabolic people are delineated. All metabolic, monopteral people are delineated. If Worden is cationic and Worden is delineated then Worden is pustulate. If someone is monopteral then they are metabolic. If someone is monopteral then they are not cationic. If Worden is delineated then Worden is metabolic. Gavra is delineated.", "logic": "\nMonopteral(worden)\nnot Cationic(gavra)\nPustulate(benni)\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Delineated(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Monopteral(x) -> Delineated(x))\nCationic(worden) and Delineated(worden) -> Pustulate(worden)\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> not Cationic(x))\nDelineated(worden) -> Metabolic(worden)\n\nDelineated(gavra)\n\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Delineated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Temple is comburent. Sheppard is not reportable. Joelly is beta. All comburent, azonic people are autogenous. All azonic, comburent people are autogenous. If Temple is reportable and Temple is autogenous then Temple is beta. If someone is comburent then they are azonic. If someone is comburent then they are not reportable. If Temple is autogenous then Temple is azonic. Temple is not beta.", "logic": "\nComburent(temple)\nnot Reportable(sheppard)\nBeta(joelly)\nforall x (Comburent(x) and Azonic(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Azonic(x) and Comburent(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nReportable(temple) and Autogenous(temple) -> Beta(temple)\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> Azonic(x))\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> not Reportable(x))\nAutogenous(temple) -> Azonic(temple)\n\nnot Beta(temple)\n\nReportable(temple) and Autogenous(temple) -> Beta(temple) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Frederic is undersize. Dolora is not amicable. Nikoletta is murmuring. All undersize, windward people are chronic. All windward, undersize people are chronic. If Frederic is amicable and Frederic is chronic then Frederic is murmuring. If someone is undersize then they are windward. If someone is undersize then they are not amicable. If Frederic is chronic then Frederic is windward. Frederic is round.", "logic": "\nUndersize(frederic)\nnot Amicable(dolora)\nMurmuring(nikoletta)\nforall x (Undersize(x) and Windward(x) -> Chronic(x))\nforall x (Windward(x) and Undersize(x) -> Chronic(x))\nAmicable(frederic) and Chronic(frederic) -> Murmuring(frederic)\nforall x (Undersize(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Undersize(x) -> not Amicable(x))\nChronic(frederic) -> Windward(frederic)\n\nRound(frederic)\n\nRound(frederic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Ivonne is insectan. Gavra is not apian. Doralyn is nonmetal. All insectan, proficient people are snuff. All proficient, insectan people are snuff. If Ivonne is apian and Ivonne is snuff then Ivonne is nonmetal. If someone is insectan then they are proficient. If someone is insectan then they are not apian. If Ivonne is snuff then Ivonne is proficient. Doralyn is not insectan.", "logic": "\nInsectan(ivonne)\nnot Apian(gavra)\nNonmetal(doralyn)\nforall x (Insectan(x) and Proficient(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Proficient(x) and Insectan(x) -> Snuff(x))\nApian(ivonne) and Snuff(ivonne) -> Nonmetal(ivonne)\nforall x (Insectan(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) -> not Apian(x))\nSnuff(ivonne) -> Proficient(ivonne)\n\nnot Insectan(doralyn)\n\nnot Insectan(doralyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "Danyette is homebound. Gaston is not damnable. Rhianon is encouraged. All homebound, social people are spastic. All social, homebound people are spastic. If Danyette is damnable and Danyette is spastic then Danyette is encouraged. If someone is homebound then they are social. If someone is homebound then they are not damnable. If Danyette is spastic then Danyette is social. Gaston is homebound.", "logic": "\nHomebound(danyette)\nnot Damnable(gaston)\nEncouraged(rhianon)\nforall x (Homebound(x) and Social(x) -> Spastic(x))\nforall x (Social(x) and Homebound(x) -> Spastic(x))\nDamnable(danyette) and Spastic(danyette) -> Encouraged(danyette)\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Social(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> not Damnable(x))\nSpastic(danyette) -> Social(danyette)\n\nHomebound(gaston)\n\nHomebound(gaston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-28"} {"premises": "The ludwig does not chase the chiquita. The ludwig is amazing. The chiquita fertilize the ludwig. The chiquita is not hardheaded. The chiquita is not sanctified. The chiquita is amazing. The chiquita is foetid. The chiquita is zymolytic. The chiquita disenchant the ludwig. The chiquita shuck the ludwig. If something fertilize the chiquita then it is foetid. If something shuck the chiquita then it disenchant the ludwig. If something fertilize the ludwig and the ludwig does not chase the chiquita then it disenchant the chiquita. If something is foetid then it disenchant the chiquita. If the chiquita disenchant the ludwig then the ludwig is foetid. If the ludwig does not chase the chiquita and the chiquita does not chase the ludwig then the chiquita shuck the ludwig. The chiquita shuck the ludwig.", "logic": "\nnot Fertilize(ludwig, chiquita)\nAmazing(ludwig)\nFertilize(chiquita, ludwig)\nnot Hardheaded(chiquita)\nnot Sanctified(chiquita)\nAmazing(chiquita)\nFoetid(chiquita)\nZymolytic(chiquita)\nDisenchant(chiquita, ludwig)\nShuck(chiquita, ludwig)\nforall x (Fertilize(x, chiquita) -> Foetid(x))\nforall x (Shuck(x, chiquita) -> Disenchant(x, ludwig))\nforall x (Fertilize(x, ludwig) and not Fertilize(ludwig, chiquita) -> Disenchant(x, chiquita))\nforall x (Foetid(x) -> Disenchant(x, chiquita))\nDisenchant(chiquita, ludwig) -> Foetid(ludwig)\nnot Fertilize(ludwig, chiquita) and not Fertilize(chiquita, ludwig) -> Shuck(chiquita, ludwig)\n\nShuck(chiquita, ludwig)\n\ntherefore Shuck(chiquita, ludwig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The zollie does not chase the ethel. The zollie is harrowing. The ethel foal the zollie. The ethel is not arthurian. The ethel is not unaltered. The ethel is harrowing. The ethel is payable. The ethel is isomorphic. The ethel subserve the zollie. The ethel thin the zollie. If something foal the ethel then it is payable. If something thin the ethel then it subserve the zollie. If something foal the zollie and the zollie does not chase the ethel then it subserve the ethel. If something is payable then it subserve the ethel. If the ethel subserve the zollie then the zollie is payable. If the zollie does not chase the ethel and the ethel does not chase the zollie then the ethel thin the zollie. The ethel is not isomorphic.", "logic": "\nnot Foal(zollie, ethel)\nHarrowing(zollie)\nFoal(ethel, zollie)\nnot Arthurian(ethel)\nnot Unaltered(ethel)\nHarrowing(ethel)\nPayable(ethel)\nIsomorphic(ethel)\nSubserve(ethel, zollie)\nThin(ethel, zollie)\nforall x (Foal(x, ethel) -> Payable(x))\nforall x (Thin(x, ethel) -> Subserve(x, zollie))\nforall x (Foal(x, zollie) and not Foal(zollie, ethel) -> Subserve(x, ethel))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Subserve(x, ethel))\nSubserve(ethel, zollie) -> Payable(zollie)\nnot Foal(zollie, ethel) and not Foal(ethel, zollie) -> Thin(ethel, zollie)\n\nnot Isomorphic(ethel)\n\ntherefore Isomorphic(ethel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The nealson does not chase the charleton. The nealson is senile. The charleton worsen the nealson. The charleton is not uncombined. The charleton is not ruminant. The charleton is senile. The charleton is etiolated. The charleton is furrowed. The charleton flaw the nealson. The charleton still the nealson. If something worsen the charleton then it is etiolated. If something still the charleton then it flaw the nealson. If something worsen the nealson and the nealson does not chase the charleton then it flaw the charleton. If something is etiolated then it flaw the charleton. If the charleton flaw the nealson then the nealson is etiolated. If the nealson does not chase the charleton and the charleton does not chase the nealson then the charleton still the nealson. The charleton flaw the charleton.", "logic": "\nnot Worsen(nealson, charleton)\nSenile(nealson)\nWorsen(charleton, nealson)\nnot Uncombined(charleton)\nnot Ruminant(charleton)\nSenile(charleton)\nEtiolated(charleton)\nFurrowed(charleton)\nFlaw(charleton, nealson)\nStill(charleton, nealson)\nforall x (Worsen(x, charleton) -> Etiolated(x))\nforall x (Still(x, charleton) -> Flaw(x, nealson))\nforall x (Worsen(x, nealson) and not Worsen(nealson, charleton) -> Flaw(x, charleton))\nforall x (Etiolated(x) -> Flaw(x, charleton))\nFlaw(charleton, nealson) -> Etiolated(nealson)\nnot Worsen(nealson, charleton) and not Worsen(charleton, nealson) -> Still(charleton, nealson)\n\nFlaw(charleton, charleton)\n\nEtiolated(charleton) and forall x (Etiolated(x) -> Flaw(x, charleton)) -> therefore Flaw(charleton, charleton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The nanette does not chase the annabella. The nanette is autotypic. The annabella gentle the nanette. The annabella is not oleophilic. The annabella is not chordal. The annabella is autotypic. The annabella is equipoised. The annabella is austral. The annabella reseal the nanette. The annabella pole the nanette. If something gentle the annabella then it is equipoised. If something pole the annabella then it reseal the nanette. If something gentle the nanette and the nanette does not chase the annabella then it reseal the annabella. If something is equipoised then it reseal the annabella. If the annabella reseal the nanette then the nanette is equipoised. If the nanette does not chase the annabella and the annabella does not chase the nanette then the annabella pole the nanette. The annabella does not need the annabella.", "logic": "\nnot Gentle(nanette, annabella)\nAutotypic(nanette)\nGentle(annabella, nanette)\nnot Oleophilic(annabella)\nnot Chordal(annabella)\nAutotypic(annabella)\nEquipoised(annabella)\nAustral(annabella)\nReseal(annabella, nanette)\nPole(annabella, nanette)\nforall x (Gentle(x, annabella) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Pole(x, annabella) -> Reseal(x, nanette))\nforall x (Gentle(x, nanette) and not Gentle(nanette, annabella) -> Reseal(x, annabella))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) -> Reseal(x, annabella))\nReseal(annabella, nanette) -> Equipoised(nanette)\nnot Gentle(nanette, annabella) and not Gentle(annabella, nanette) -> Pole(annabella, nanette)\n\nnot Reseal(annabella, annabella)\n\nEquipoised(annabella) and forall x (Equipoised(x) -> Reseal(x, annabella)) -> therefore Reseal(annabella, annabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The darla does not chase the dunc. The darla is fatherly. The dunc buttweld the darla. The dunc is not excrescent. The dunc is not excess. The dunc is fatherly. The dunc is autocratic. The dunc is best. The dunc casket the darla. The dunc recrudesce the darla. If something buttweld the dunc then it is autocratic. If something recrudesce the dunc then it casket the darla. If something buttweld the darla and the darla does not chase the dunc then it casket the dunc. If something is autocratic then it casket the dunc. If the dunc casket the darla then the darla is autocratic. If the darla does not chase the dunc and the dunc does not chase the darla then the dunc recrudesce the darla. The darla casket the dunc.", "logic": "\nnot Buttweld(darla, dunc)\nFatherly(darla)\nButtweld(dunc, darla)\nnot Excrescent(dunc)\nnot Excess(dunc)\nFatherly(dunc)\nAutocratic(dunc)\nBest(dunc)\nCasket(dunc, darla)\nRecrudesce(dunc, darla)\nforall x (Buttweld(x, dunc) -> Autocratic(x))\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, dunc) -> Casket(x, darla))\nforall x (Buttweld(x, darla) and not Buttweld(darla, dunc) -> Casket(x, dunc))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> Casket(x, dunc))\nCasket(dunc, darla) -> Autocratic(darla)\nnot Buttweld(darla, dunc) and not Buttweld(dunc, darla) -> Recrudesce(dunc, darla)\n\nCasket(darla, dunc)\n\nCasket(dunc, darla) and Casket(dunc, darla) -> Autocratic(darla) -> therefore Autocratic(darla) Autocratic(darla) and forall x (Autocratic(x) -> Casket(x, dunc)) -> therefore Casket(darla, dunc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The evita does not chase the glen. The evita is venezuelan. The glen extort the evita. The glen is not monastical. The glen is not bicuspid. The glen is venezuelan. The glen is ungrasped. The glen is allopatric. The glen answer the evita. The glen flavor the evita. If something extort the glen then it is ungrasped. If something flavor the glen then it answer the evita. If something extort the evita and the evita does not chase the glen then it answer the glen. If something is ungrasped then it answer the glen. If the glen answer the evita then the evita is ungrasped. If the evita does not chase the glen and the glen does not chase the evita then the glen flavor the evita. The evita does not need the glen.", "logic": "\nnot Extort(evita, glen)\nVenezuelan(evita)\nExtort(glen, evita)\nnot Monastical(glen)\nnot Bicuspid(glen)\nVenezuelan(glen)\nUngrasped(glen)\nAllopatric(glen)\nAnswer(glen, evita)\nFlavor(glen, evita)\nforall x (Extort(x, glen) -> Ungrasped(x))\nforall x (Flavor(x, glen) -> Answer(x, evita))\nforall x (Extort(x, evita) and not Extort(evita, glen) -> Answer(x, glen))\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Answer(x, glen))\nAnswer(glen, evita) -> Ungrasped(evita)\nnot Extort(evita, glen) and not Extort(glen, evita) -> Flavor(glen, evita)\n\nnot Answer(evita, glen)\n\nAnswer(glen, evita) and Answer(glen, evita) -> Ungrasped(evita) -> therefore Ungrasped(evita) Ungrasped(evita) and forall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Answer(x, glen)) -> therefore Answer(evita, glen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The madlin does not chase the doralynn. The madlin is abdominal. The doralynn spur the madlin. The doralynn is not diarrhetic. The doralynn is not honeyed. The doralynn is abdominal. The doralynn is unsinkable. The doralynn is platelike. The doralynn matter the madlin. The doralynn sauce the madlin. If something spur the doralynn then it is unsinkable. If something sauce the doralynn then it matter the madlin. If something spur the madlin and the madlin does not chase the doralynn then it matter the doralynn. If something is unsinkable then it matter the doralynn. If the doralynn matter the madlin then the madlin is unsinkable. If the madlin does not chase the doralynn and the doralynn does not chase the madlin then the doralynn sauce the madlin. The madlin does not need the madlin.", "logic": "\nnot Spur(madlin, doralynn)\nAbdominal(madlin)\nSpur(doralynn, madlin)\nnot Diarrhetic(doralynn)\nnot Honeyed(doralynn)\nAbdominal(doralynn)\nUnsinkable(doralynn)\nPlatelike(doralynn)\nMatter(doralynn, madlin)\nSauce(doralynn, madlin)\nforall x (Spur(x, doralynn) -> Unsinkable(x))\nforall x (Sauce(x, doralynn) -> Matter(x, madlin))\nforall x (Spur(x, madlin) and not Spur(madlin, doralynn) -> Matter(x, doralynn))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Matter(x, doralynn))\nMatter(doralynn, madlin) -> Unsinkable(madlin)\nnot Spur(madlin, doralynn) and not Spur(doralynn, madlin) -> Sauce(doralynn, madlin)\n\nnot Matter(madlin, madlin)\n\nforall x (Sauce(x, doralynn) -> Matter(x, madlin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The ethel does not chase the catlaina. The ethel is northward. The catlaina summate the ethel. The catlaina is not underwater. The catlaina is not waxing. The catlaina is northward. The catlaina is blown. The catlaina is jaunty. The catlaina copyedit the ethel. The catlaina chant the ethel. If something summate the catlaina then it is blown. If something chant the catlaina then it copyedit the ethel. If something summate the ethel and the ethel does not chase the catlaina then it copyedit the catlaina. If something is blown then it copyedit the catlaina. If the catlaina copyedit the ethel then the ethel is blown. If the ethel does not chase the catlaina and the catlaina does not chase the ethel then the catlaina chant the ethel. The ethel summate the ethel.", "logic": "\nnot Summate(ethel, catlaina)\nNorthward(ethel)\nSummate(catlaina, ethel)\nnot Underwater(catlaina)\nnot Waxing(catlaina)\nNorthward(catlaina)\nBlown(catlaina)\nJaunty(catlaina)\nCopyedit(catlaina, ethel)\nChant(catlaina, ethel)\nforall x (Summate(x, catlaina) -> Blown(x))\nforall x (Chant(x, catlaina) -> Copyedit(x, ethel))\nforall x (Summate(x, ethel) and not Summate(ethel, catlaina) -> Copyedit(x, catlaina))\nforall x (Blown(x) -> Copyedit(x, catlaina))\nCopyedit(catlaina, ethel) -> Blown(ethel)\nnot Summate(ethel, catlaina) and not Summate(catlaina, ethel) -> Chant(catlaina, ethel)\n\nSummate(ethel, ethel)\n\nSummate(ethel, ethel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The marylou does not chase the lena. The marylou is feigned. The lena lever the marylou. The lena is not doltish. The lena is not bolivian. The lena is feigned. The lena is uncouth. The lena is thickened. The lena resume the marylou. The lena blush the marylou. If something lever the lena then it is uncouth. If something blush the lena then it resume the marylou. If something lever the marylou and the marylou does not chase the lena then it resume the lena. If something is uncouth then it resume the lena. If the lena resume the marylou then the marylou is uncouth. If the marylou does not chase the lena and the lena does not chase the marylou then the lena blush the marylou. The marylou does not see the marylou.", "logic": "\nnot Lever(marylou, lena)\nFeigned(marylou)\nLever(lena, marylou)\nnot Doltish(lena)\nnot Bolivian(lena)\nFeigned(lena)\nUncouth(lena)\nThickened(lena)\nResume(lena, marylou)\nBlush(lena, marylou)\nforall x (Lever(x, lena) -> Uncouth(x))\nforall x (Blush(x, lena) -> Resume(x, marylou))\nforall x (Lever(x, marylou) and not Lever(marylou, lena) -> Resume(x, lena))\nforall x (Uncouth(x) -> Resume(x, lena))\nResume(lena, marylou) -> Uncouth(marylou)\nnot Lever(marylou, lena) and not Lever(lena, marylou) -> Blush(lena, marylou)\n\nnot Blush(marylou, marylou)\n\nnot Blush(marylou, marylou) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The denni does not chase the conny. The denni is hurried. The conny cackle the denni. The conny is not chemical. The conny is not spiderlike. The conny is hurried. The conny is cushiony. The conny is aged. The conny flow the denni. The conny disbar the denni. If something cackle the conny then it is cushiony. If something disbar the conny then it flow the denni. If something cackle the denni and the denni does not chase the conny then it flow the conny. If something is cushiony then it flow the conny. If the conny flow the denni then the denni is cushiony. If the denni does not chase the conny and the conny does not chase the denni then the conny disbar the denni. The denni is chemical.", "logic": "\nnot Cackle(denni, conny)\nHurried(denni)\nCackle(conny, denni)\nnot Chemical(conny)\nnot Spiderlike(conny)\nHurried(conny)\nCushiony(conny)\nAged(conny)\nFlow(conny, denni)\nDisbar(conny, denni)\nforall x (Cackle(x, conny) -> Cushiony(x))\nforall x (Disbar(x, conny) -> Flow(x, denni))\nforall x (Cackle(x, denni) and not Cackle(denni, conny) -> Flow(x, conny))\nforall x (Cushiony(x) -> Flow(x, conny))\nFlow(conny, denni) -> Cushiony(denni)\nnot Cackle(denni, conny) and not Cackle(conny, denni) -> Disbar(conny, denni)\n\nChemical(denni)\n\nChemical(denni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The fawn does not chase the ferguson. The fawn is impelled. The ferguson capacitate the fawn. The ferguson is not crowning. The ferguson is not champion. The ferguson is impelled. The ferguson is ratable. The ferguson is feverous. The ferguson spruce the fawn. The ferguson theologise the fawn. If something capacitate the ferguson then it is ratable. If something theologise the ferguson then it spruce the fawn. If something capacitate the fawn and the fawn does not chase the ferguson then it spruce the ferguson. If something is ratable then it spruce the ferguson. If the ferguson spruce the fawn then the fawn is ratable. If the fawn does not chase the ferguson and the ferguson does not chase the fawn then the ferguson theologise the fawn. The fawn does not see the ferguson.", "logic": "\nnot Capacitate(fawn, ferguson)\nImpelled(fawn)\nCapacitate(ferguson, fawn)\nnot Crowning(ferguson)\nnot Champion(ferguson)\nImpelled(ferguson)\nRatable(ferguson)\nFeverous(ferguson)\nSpruce(ferguson, fawn)\nTheologise(ferguson, fawn)\nforall x (Capacitate(x, ferguson) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Theologise(x, ferguson) -> Spruce(x, fawn))\nforall x (Capacitate(x, fawn) and not Capacitate(fawn, ferguson) -> Spruce(x, ferguson))\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> Spruce(x, ferguson))\nSpruce(ferguson, fawn) -> Ratable(fawn)\nnot Capacitate(fawn, ferguson) and not Capacitate(ferguson, fawn) -> Theologise(ferguson, fawn)\n\nnot Theologise(fawn, ferguson)\n\nnot Theologise(fawn, ferguson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The binnie does not chase the justine. The binnie is imbecile. The justine shun the binnie. The justine is not glossy. The justine is not thrown. The justine is imbecile. The justine is tenth. The justine is excretory. The justine cannulate the binnie. The justine telescope the binnie. If something shun the justine then it is tenth. If something telescope the justine then it cannulate the binnie. If something shun the binnie and the binnie does not chase the justine then it cannulate the justine. If something is tenth then it cannulate the justine. If the justine cannulate the binnie then the binnie is tenth. If the binnie does not chase the justine and the justine does not chase the binnie then the justine telescope the binnie. The justine telescope the justine.", "logic": "\nnot Shun(binnie, justine)\nImbecile(binnie)\nShun(justine, binnie)\nnot Glossy(justine)\nnot Thrown(justine)\nImbecile(justine)\nTenth(justine)\nExcretory(justine)\nCannulate(justine, binnie)\nTelescope(justine, binnie)\nforall x (Shun(x, justine) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Telescope(x, justine) -> Cannulate(x, binnie))\nforall x (Shun(x, binnie) and not Shun(binnie, justine) -> Cannulate(x, justine))\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Cannulate(x, justine))\nCannulate(justine, binnie) -> Tenth(binnie)\nnot Shun(binnie, justine) and not Shun(justine, binnie) -> Telescope(justine, binnie)\n\nTelescope(justine, justine)\n\nTelescope(justine, justine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2160"} {"premises": "The tucky is untoward. The tucky cheer the cherish. The cherish relent the tucky. The cherish is limbed. The cherish is heretical. The cherish is cespitose. The cherish cheer the tucky. The cherish profiteer the fazeel. The fazeel relent the cherish. The fazeel is heretical. The fazeel is princely. The fazeel profiteer the tucky. If something is heretical then it profiteer the cherish. If something profiteer the tucky and it profiteer the cherish then it cheer the tucky. If something is princely and it profiteer the cherish then the cherish cheer the tucky. The fazeel is heretical.", "logic": "\nUntoward(tucky)\nCheer(tucky, cherish)\nRelent(cherish, tucky)\nLimbed(cherish)\nHeretical(cherish)\nCespitose(cherish)\nCheer(cherish, tucky)\nProfiteer(cherish, fazeel)\nRelent(fazeel, cherish)\nHeretical(fazeel)\nPrincely(fazeel)\nProfiteer(fazeel, tucky)\nforall x (Heretical(x) -> Profiteer(x, cherish))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, tucky) and Profiteer(x, cherish) -> Cheer(x, tucky))\nforall x (Princely(x) and Profiteer(x, cherish) -> Cheer(cherish, tucky))\n\nHeretical(fazeel)\n\ntherefore Heretical(fazeel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The shirlene is eightieth. The shirlene parole the niven. The niven process the shirlene. The niven is busy. The niven is molten. The niven is uncured. The niven parole the shirlene. The niven dower the sheba. The sheba process the niven. The sheba is molten. The sheba is imputable. The sheba dower the shirlene. If something is molten then it dower the niven. If something dower the shirlene and it dower the niven then it parole the shirlene. If something is imputable and it dower the niven then the niven parole the shirlene. The niven is not uncured.", "logic": "\nEightieth(shirlene)\nParole(shirlene, niven)\nProcess(niven, shirlene)\nBusy(niven)\nMolten(niven)\nUncured(niven)\nParole(niven, shirlene)\nDower(niven, sheba)\nProcess(sheba, niven)\nMolten(sheba)\nImputable(sheba)\nDower(sheba, shirlene)\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Dower(x, niven))\nforall x (Dower(x, shirlene) and Dower(x, niven) -> Parole(x, shirlene))\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Dower(x, niven) -> Parole(niven, shirlene))\n\nnot Uncured(niven)\n\ntherefore Uncured(niven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The hank is anglican. The hank pitchfork the roxine. The roxine wheel the hank. The roxine is reassured. The roxine is gusseted. The roxine is another. The roxine pitchfork the hank. The roxine sensualize the pamelina. The pamelina wheel the roxine. The pamelina is gusseted. The pamelina is arillate. The pamelina sensualize the hank. If something is gusseted then it sensualize the roxine. If something sensualize the hank and it sensualize the roxine then it pitchfork the hank. If something is arillate and it sensualize the roxine then the roxine pitchfork the hank. The pamelina sensualize the roxine.", "logic": "\nAnglican(hank)\nPitchfork(hank, roxine)\nWheel(roxine, hank)\nReassured(roxine)\nGusseted(roxine)\nAnother(roxine)\nPitchfork(roxine, hank)\nSensualize(roxine, pamelina)\nWheel(pamelina, roxine)\nGusseted(pamelina)\nArillate(pamelina)\nSensualize(pamelina, hank)\nforall x (Gusseted(x) -> Sensualize(x, roxine))\nforall x (Sensualize(x, hank) and Sensualize(x, roxine) -> Pitchfork(x, hank))\nforall x (Arillate(x) and Sensualize(x, roxine) -> Pitchfork(roxine, hank))\n\nSensualize(pamelina, roxine)\n\nGusseted(pamelina) and forall x (Gusseted(x) -> Sensualize(x, roxine)) -> therefore Sensualize(pamelina, roxine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The gretal is decadent. The gretal unarm the tuckie. The tuckie zone the gretal. The tuckie is satyrical. The tuckie is sign. The tuckie is sequent. The tuckie unarm the gretal. The tuckie embrown the karl. The karl zone the tuckie. The karl is sign. The karl is still. The karl embrown the gretal. If something is sign then it embrown the tuckie. If something embrown the gretal and it embrown the tuckie then it unarm the gretal. If something is still and it embrown the tuckie then the tuckie unarm the gretal. The tuckie does not need the tuckie.", "logic": "\nDecadent(gretal)\nUnarm(gretal, tuckie)\nZone(tuckie, gretal)\nSatyrical(tuckie)\nSign(tuckie)\nSequent(tuckie)\nUnarm(tuckie, gretal)\nEmbrown(tuckie, karl)\nZone(karl, tuckie)\nSign(karl)\nStill(karl)\nEmbrown(karl, gretal)\nforall x (Sign(x) -> Embrown(x, tuckie))\nforall x (Embrown(x, gretal) and Embrown(x, tuckie) -> Unarm(x, gretal))\nforall x (Still(x) and Embrown(x, tuckie) -> Unarm(tuckie, gretal))\n\nnot Embrown(tuckie, tuckie)\n\nSign(tuckie) and forall x (Sign(x) -> Embrown(x, tuckie)) -> therefore Embrown(tuckie, tuckie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The josee is unwatchful. The josee retrace the garry. The garry reside the josee. The garry is sheared. The garry is shopsoiled. The garry is withered. The garry retrace the josee. The garry cache the frederick. The frederick reside the garry. The frederick is shopsoiled. The frederick is astronomic. The frederick cache the josee. If something is shopsoiled then it cache the garry. If something cache the josee and it cache the garry then it retrace the josee. If something is astronomic and it cache the garry then the garry retrace the josee. The frederick retrace the josee.", "logic": "\nUnwatchful(josee)\nRetrace(josee, garry)\nReside(garry, josee)\nSheared(garry)\nShopsoiled(garry)\nWithered(garry)\nRetrace(garry, josee)\nCache(garry, frederick)\nReside(frederick, garry)\nShopsoiled(frederick)\nAstronomic(frederick)\nCache(frederick, josee)\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Cache(x, garry))\nforall x (Cache(x, josee) and Cache(x, garry) -> Retrace(x, josee))\nforall x (Astronomic(x) and Cache(x, garry) -> Retrace(garry, josee))\n\nRetrace(frederick, josee)\n\nShopsoiled(frederick) and forall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Cache(x, garry)) -> therefore Cache(frederick, garry) Cache(frederick, josee) and Cache(frederick, garry) and forall x (Cache(x, josee) and Cache(x, garry) -> Retrace(x, josee)) -> therefore Retrace(frederick, josee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The cheri is marbleized. The cheri fumble the shantee. The shantee dive the cheri. The shantee is hardheaded. The shantee is lacy. The shantee is opaque. The shantee fumble the cheri. The shantee dance the spiros. The spiros dive the shantee. The spiros is lacy. The spiros is victorious. The spiros dance the cheri. If something is lacy then it dance the shantee. If something dance the cheri and it dance the shantee then it fumble the cheri. If something is victorious and it dance the shantee then the shantee fumble the cheri. The spiros does not like the cheri.", "logic": "\nMarbleized(cheri)\nFumble(cheri, shantee)\nDive(shantee, cheri)\nHardheaded(shantee)\nLacy(shantee)\nOpaque(shantee)\nFumble(shantee, cheri)\nDance(shantee, spiros)\nDive(spiros, shantee)\nLacy(spiros)\nVictorious(spiros)\nDance(spiros, cheri)\nforall x (Lacy(x) -> Dance(x, shantee))\nforall x (Dance(x, cheri) and Dance(x, shantee) -> Fumble(x, cheri))\nforall x (Victorious(x) and Dance(x, shantee) -> Fumble(shantee, cheri))\n\nnot Fumble(spiros, cheri)\n\nLacy(spiros) and forall x (Lacy(x) -> Dance(x, shantee)) -> therefore Dance(spiros, shantee) Dance(spiros, cheri) and Dance(spiros, shantee) and forall x (Dance(x, cheri) and Dance(x, shantee) -> Fumble(x, cheri)) -> therefore Fumble(spiros, cheri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The mel is genital. The mel leapfrog the darth. The darth mask the mel. The darth is vertebral. The darth is neuralgic. The darth is convoluted. The darth leapfrog the mel. The darth bankrupt the betty. The betty mask the darth. The betty is neuralgic. The betty is zonary. The betty bankrupt the mel. If something is neuralgic then it bankrupt the darth. If something bankrupt the mel and it bankrupt the darth then it leapfrog the mel. If something is zonary and it bankrupt the darth then the darth leapfrog the mel. The mel does not like the mel.", "logic": "\nGenital(mel)\nLeapfrog(mel, darth)\nMask(darth, mel)\nVertebral(darth)\nNeuralgic(darth)\nConvoluted(darth)\nLeapfrog(darth, mel)\nBankrupt(darth, betty)\nMask(betty, darth)\nNeuralgic(betty)\nZonary(betty)\nBankrupt(betty, mel)\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) -> Bankrupt(x, darth))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, mel) and Bankrupt(x, darth) -> Leapfrog(x, mel))\nforall x (Zonary(x) and Bankrupt(x, darth) -> Leapfrog(darth, mel))\n\nnot Leapfrog(mel, mel)\n\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, mel) and Bankrupt(x, darth) -> Leapfrog(x, mel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The edin is streaming. The edin devein the joli. The joli overclothe the edin. The joli is buttonlike. The joli is royal. The joli is scalar. The joli devein the edin. The joli besmirch the tymothy. The tymothy overclothe the joli. The tymothy is royal. The tymothy is gawky. The tymothy besmirch the edin. If something is royal then it besmirch the joli. If something besmirch the edin and it besmirch the joli then it devein the edin. If something is gawky and it besmirch the joli then the joli devein the edin. The edin besmirch the joli.", "logic": "\nStreaming(edin)\nDevein(edin, joli)\nOverclothe(joli, edin)\nButtonlike(joli)\nRoyal(joli)\nScalar(joli)\nDevein(joli, edin)\nBesmirch(joli, tymothy)\nOverclothe(tymothy, joli)\nRoyal(tymothy)\nGawky(tymothy)\nBesmirch(tymothy, edin)\nforall x (Royal(x) -> Besmirch(x, joli))\nforall x (Besmirch(x, edin) and Besmirch(x, joli) -> Devein(x, edin))\nforall x (Gawky(x) and Besmirch(x, joli) -> Devein(joli, edin))\n\nBesmirch(edin, joli)\n\nforall x (Royal(x) -> Besmirch(x, joli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The neddy is mournful. The neddy pillage the debi. The debi homologise the neddy. The debi is infantile. The debi is biform. The debi is flossy. The debi pillage the neddy. The debi summon the jeanna. The jeanna homologise the debi. The jeanna is biform. The jeanna is fibrillose. The jeanna summon the neddy. If something is biform then it summon the debi. If something summon the neddy and it summon the debi then it pillage the neddy. If something is fibrillose and it summon the debi then the debi pillage the neddy. The debi is not mournful.", "logic": "\nMournful(neddy)\nPillage(neddy, debi)\nHomologise(debi, neddy)\nInfantile(debi)\nBiform(debi)\nFlossy(debi)\nPillage(debi, neddy)\nSummon(debi, jeanna)\nHomologise(jeanna, debi)\nBiform(jeanna)\nFibrillose(jeanna)\nSummon(jeanna, neddy)\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Summon(x, debi))\nforall x (Summon(x, neddy) and Summon(x, debi) -> Pillage(x, neddy))\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) and Summon(x, debi) -> Pillage(debi, neddy))\n\nnot Mournful(debi)\n\nnot Mournful(debi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The gisella is favorable. The gisella fate the doti. The doti fine the gisella. The doti is responsive. The doti is sooty. The doti is unlicenced. The doti fate the gisella. The doti abduce the nolie. The nolie fine the doti. The nolie is sooty. The nolie is kayoed. The nolie abduce the gisella. If something is sooty then it abduce the doti. If something abduce the gisella and it abduce the doti then it fate the gisella. If something is kayoed and it abduce the doti then the doti fate the gisella. The doti fine the doti.", "logic": "\nFavorable(gisella)\nFate(gisella, doti)\nFine(doti, gisella)\nResponsive(doti)\nSooty(doti)\nUnlicenced(doti)\nFate(doti, gisella)\nAbduce(doti, nolie)\nFine(nolie, doti)\nSooty(nolie)\nKayoed(nolie)\nAbduce(nolie, gisella)\nforall x (Sooty(x) -> Abduce(x, doti))\nforall x (Abduce(x, gisella) and Abduce(x, doti) -> Fate(x, gisella))\nforall x (Kayoed(x) and Abduce(x, doti) -> Fate(doti, gisella))\n\nFine(doti, doti)\n\nFine(doti, doti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The helen is anorectic. The helen bejewel the cassandra. The cassandra remand the helen. The cassandra is unimpaired. The cassandra is impolite. The cassandra is undesiring. The cassandra bejewel the helen. The cassandra stultify the terrill. The terrill remand the cassandra. The terrill is impolite. The terrill is oratorical. The terrill stultify the helen. If something is impolite then it stultify the cassandra. If something stultify the helen and it stultify the cassandra then it bejewel the helen. If something is oratorical and it stultify the cassandra then the cassandra bejewel the helen. The helen is not undesiring.", "logic": "\nAnorectic(helen)\nBejewel(helen, cassandra)\nRemand(cassandra, helen)\nUnimpaired(cassandra)\nImpolite(cassandra)\nUndesiring(cassandra)\nBejewel(cassandra, helen)\nStultify(cassandra, terrill)\nRemand(terrill, cassandra)\nImpolite(terrill)\nOratorical(terrill)\nStultify(terrill, helen)\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Stultify(x, cassandra))\nforall x (Stultify(x, helen) and Stultify(x, cassandra) -> Bejewel(x, helen))\nforall x (Oratorical(x) and Stultify(x, cassandra) -> Bejewel(cassandra, helen))\n\nnot Undesiring(helen)\n\nnot Undesiring(helen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The berri is hierarchic. The berri cackle the durand. The durand carp the berri. The durand is illusive. The durand is unused. The durand is baptismal. The durand cackle the berri. The durand mismate the tabor. The tabor carp the durand. The tabor is unused. The tabor is ailing. The tabor mismate the berri. If something is unused then it mismate the durand. If something mismate the berri and it mismate the durand then it cackle the berri. If something is ailing and it mismate the durand then the durand cackle the berri. The berri mismate the berri.", "logic": "\nHierarchic(berri)\nCackle(berri, durand)\nCarp(durand, berri)\nIllusive(durand)\nUnused(durand)\nBaptismal(durand)\nCackle(durand, berri)\nMismate(durand, tabor)\nCarp(tabor, durand)\nUnused(tabor)\nAiling(tabor)\nMismate(tabor, berri)\nforall x (Unused(x) -> Mismate(x, durand))\nforall x (Mismate(x, berri) and Mismate(x, durand) -> Cackle(x, berri))\nforall x (Ailing(x) and Mismate(x, durand) -> Cackle(durand, berri))\n\nMismate(berri, berri)\n\nMismate(berri, berri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-605"} {"premises": "The lissa crest the collie. The collie mangle the celine. The celine mangle the lissa. If something crest the collie then it tell the collie. If something crest the celine and the celine is not deceased then it mangle the lissa. If something tell the collie then it does not visit the lissa. If the celine is deceased and the celine does not chase the lissa then the lissa crest the celine. If the celine does not chase the collie then the celine mangle the collie. If the celine crest the lissa then the celine mangle the collie. The lissa crest the collie.", "logic": "\nCrest(lissa, collie)\nMangle(collie, celine)\nMangle(celine, lissa)\nforall x (Crest(x, collie) -> Tell(x, collie))\nforall x (Crest(x, celine) and not Deceased(celine) -> Mangle(x, lissa))\nforall x (Tell(x, collie) -> not Crest(x, lissa))\nDeceased(celine) and not Tell(celine, lissa) -> Crest(lissa, celine)\nnot Tell(celine, collie) -> Mangle(celine, collie)\nCrest(celine, lissa) -> Mangle(celine, collie)\n\nCrest(lissa, collie)\n\ntherefore Crest(lissa, collie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The zollie overburden the sanson. The sanson clinker the lorne. The lorne clinker the zollie. If something overburden the sanson then it starboard the sanson. If something overburden the lorne and the lorne is not frore then it clinker the zollie. If something starboard the sanson then it does not visit the zollie. If the lorne is frore and the lorne does not chase the zollie then the zollie overburden the lorne. If the lorne does not chase the sanson then the lorne clinker the sanson. If the lorne overburden the zollie then the lorne clinker the sanson. The zollie does not visit the sanson.", "logic": "\nOverburden(zollie, sanson)\nClinker(sanson, lorne)\nClinker(lorne, zollie)\nforall x (Overburden(x, sanson) -> Starboard(x, sanson))\nforall x (Overburden(x, lorne) and not Frore(lorne) -> Clinker(x, zollie))\nforall x (Starboard(x, sanson) -> not Overburden(x, zollie))\nFrore(lorne) and not Starboard(lorne, zollie) -> Overburden(zollie, lorne)\nnot Starboard(lorne, sanson) -> Clinker(lorne, sanson)\nOverburden(lorne, zollie) -> Clinker(lorne, sanson)\n\nnot Overburden(zollie, sanson)\n\ntherefore Overburden(zollie, sanson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The karilynn fluff the nalani. The nalani welter the doroteya. The doroteya welter the karilynn. If something fluff the nalani then it snip the nalani. If something fluff the doroteya and the doroteya is not bacillary then it welter the karilynn. If something snip the nalani then it does not visit the karilynn. If the doroteya is bacillary and the doroteya does not chase the karilynn then the karilynn fluff the doroteya. If the doroteya does not chase the nalani then the doroteya welter the nalani. If the doroteya fluff the karilynn then the doroteya welter the nalani. The karilynn snip the nalani.", "logic": "\nFluff(karilynn, nalani)\nWelter(nalani, doroteya)\nWelter(doroteya, karilynn)\nforall x (Fluff(x, nalani) -> Snip(x, nalani))\nforall x (Fluff(x, doroteya) and not Bacillary(doroteya) -> Welter(x, karilynn))\nforall x (Snip(x, nalani) -> not Fluff(x, karilynn))\nBacillary(doroteya) and not Snip(doroteya, karilynn) -> Fluff(karilynn, doroteya)\nnot Snip(doroteya, nalani) -> Welter(doroteya, nalani)\nFluff(doroteya, karilynn) -> Welter(doroteya, nalani)\n\nSnip(karilynn, nalani)\n\nFluff(karilynn, nalani) and forall x (Fluff(x, nalani) -> Snip(x, nalani)) -> therefore Snip(karilynn, nalani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The patrik tucker the spiros. The spiros knit the venita. The venita knit the patrik. If something tucker the spiros then it expel the spiros. If something tucker the venita and the venita is not disfigured then it knit the patrik. If something expel the spiros then it does not visit the patrik. If the venita is disfigured and the venita does not chase the patrik then the patrik tucker the venita. If the venita does not chase the spiros then the venita knit the spiros. If the venita tucker the patrik then the venita knit the spiros. The patrik does not chase the spiros.", "logic": "\nTucker(patrik, spiros)\nKnit(spiros, venita)\nKnit(venita, patrik)\nforall x (Tucker(x, spiros) -> Expel(x, spiros))\nforall x (Tucker(x, venita) and not Disfigured(venita) -> Knit(x, patrik))\nforall x (Expel(x, spiros) -> not Tucker(x, patrik))\nDisfigured(venita) and not Expel(venita, patrik) -> Tucker(patrik, venita)\nnot Expel(venita, spiros) -> Knit(venita, spiros)\nTucker(venita, patrik) -> Knit(venita, spiros)\n\nnot Expel(patrik, spiros)\n\nTucker(patrik, spiros) and forall x (Tucker(x, spiros) -> Expel(x, spiros)) -> therefore Expel(patrik, spiros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The johanna sanctify the charyl. The charyl gulp the curt. The curt gulp the johanna. If something sanctify the charyl then it beat the charyl. If something sanctify the curt and the curt is not cellular then it gulp the johanna. If something beat the charyl then it does not visit the johanna. If the curt is cellular and the curt does not chase the johanna then the johanna sanctify the curt. If the curt does not chase the charyl then the curt gulp the charyl. If the curt sanctify the johanna then the curt gulp the charyl. The johanna does not visit the johanna.", "logic": "\nSanctify(johanna, charyl)\nGulp(charyl, curt)\nGulp(curt, johanna)\nforall x (Sanctify(x, charyl) -> Beat(x, charyl))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, curt) and not Cellular(curt) -> Gulp(x, johanna))\nforall x (Beat(x, charyl) -> not Sanctify(x, johanna))\nCellular(curt) and not Beat(curt, johanna) -> Sanctify(johanna, curt)\nnot Beat(curt, charyl) -> Gulp(curt, charyl)\nSanctify(curt, johanna) -> Gulp(curt, charyl)\n\nnot Sanctify(johanna, johanna)\n\nSanctify(johanna, charyl) and forall x (Sanctify(x, charyl) -> Beat(x, charyl)) -> therefore Beat(johanna, charyl) Beat(johanna, charyl) and forall x (Beat(x, charyl) -> not Sanctify(x, johanna)) -> therefore not Sanctify(johanna, johanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The camille shit the marlon. The marlon chronicle the odetta. The odetta chronicle the camille. If something shit the marlon then it toenail the marlon. If something shit the odetta and the odetta is not millennial then it chronicle the camille. If something toenail the marlon then it does not visit the camille. If the odetta is millennial and the odetta does not chase the camille then the camille shit the odetta. If the odetta does not chase the marlon then the odetta chronicle the marlon. If the odetta shit the camille then the odetta chronicle the marlon. The camille shit the camille.", "logic": "\nShit(camille, marlon)\nChronicle(marlon, odetta)\nChronicle(odetta, camille)\nforall x (Shit(x, marlon) -> Toenail(x, marlon))\nforall x (Shit(x, odetta) and not Millennial(odetta) -> Chronicle(x, camille))\nforall x (Toenail(x, marlon) -> not Shit(x, camille))\nMillennial(odetta) and not Toenail(odetta, camille) -> Shit(camille, odetta)\nnot Toenail(odetta, marlon) -> Chronicle(odetta, marlon)\nShit(odetta, camille) -> Chronicle(odetta, marlon)\n\nShit(camille, camille)\n\nShit(camille, marlon) and forall x (Shit(x, marlon) -> Toenail(x, marlon)) -> therefore Toenail(camille, marlon) Toenail(camille, marlon) and forall x (Toenail(x, marlon) -> not Shit(x, camille)) -> therefore not Shit(camille, camille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The tibold memorize the felisha. The felisha disembroil the thomas. The thomas disembroil the tibold. If something memorize the felisha then it clench the felisha. If something memorize the thomas and the thomas is not localized then it disembroil the tibold. If something clench the felisha then it does not visit the tibold. If the thomas is localized and the thomas does not chase the tibold then the tibold memorize the thomas. If the thomas does not chase the felisha then the thomas disembroil the felisha. If the thomas memorize the tibold then the thomas disembroil the felisha. The felisha does not chase the felisha.", "logic": "\nMemorize(tibold, felisha)\nDisembroil(felisha, thomas)\nDisembroil(thomas, tibold)\nforall x (Memorize(x, felisha) -> Clench(x, felisha))\nforall x (Memorize(x, thomas) and not Localized(thomas) -> Disembroil(x, tibold))\nforall x (Clench(x, felisha) -> not Memorize(x, tibold))\nLocalized(thomas) and not Clench(thomas, tibold) -> Memorize(tibold, thomas)\nnot Clench(thomas, felisha) -> Disembroil(thomas, felisha)\nMemorize(thomas, tibold) -> Disembroil(thomas, felisha)\n\nnot Clench(felisha, felisha)\n\nforall x (Memorize(x, felisha) -> Clench(x, felisha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The eustace dribble the melitta. The melitta crystalise the reginald. The reginald crystalise the eustace. If something dribble the melitta then it fold the melitta. If something dribble the reginald and the reginald is not chilling then it crystalise the eustace. If something fold the melitta then it does not visit the eustace. If the reginald is chilling and the reginald does not chase the eustace then the eustace dribble the reginald. If the reginald does not chase the melitta then the reginald crystalise the melitta. If the reginald dribble the eustace then the reginald crystalise the melitta. The eustace crystalise the eustace.", "logic": "\nDribble(eustace, melitta)\nCrystalise(melitta, reginald)\nCrystalise(reginald, eustace)\nforall x (Dribble(x, melitta) -> Fold(x, melitta))\nforall x (Dribble(x, reginald) and not Chilling(reginald) -> Crystalise(x, eustace))\nforall x (Fold(x, melitta) -> not Dribble(x, eustace))\nChilling(reginald) and not Fold(reginald, eustace) -> Dribble(eustace, reginald)\nnot Fold(reginald, melitta) -> Crystalise(reginald, melitta)\nDribble(reginald, eustace) -> Crystalise(reginald, melitta)\n\nCrystalise(eustace, eustace)\n\nforall x (Dribble(x, reginald) and not Chilling(reginald) -> Crystalise(x, eustace)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The garvin bracket the dorri. The dorri antecede the rowe. The rowe antecede the garvin. If something bracket the dorri then it palter the dorri. If something bracket the rowe and the rowe is not scythian then it antecede the garvin. If something palter the dorri then it does not visit the garvin. If the rowe is scythian and the rowe does not chase the garvin then the garvin bracket the rowe. If the rowe does not chase the dorri then the rowe antecede the dorri. If the rowe bracket the garvin then the rowe antecede the dorri. The rowe does not like the dorri.", "logic": "\nBracket(garvin, dorri)\nAntecede(dorri, rowe)\nAntecede(rowe, garvin)\nforall x (Bracket(x, dorri) -> Palter(x, dorri))\nforall x (Bracket(x, rowe) and not Scythian(rowe) -> Antecede(x, garvin))\nforall x (Palter(x, dorri) -> not Bracket(x, garvin))\nScythian(rowe) and not Palter(rowe, garvin) -> Bracket(garvin, rowe)\nnot Palter(rowe, dorri) -> Antecede(rowe, dorri)\nBracket(rowe, garvin) -> Antecede(rowe, dorri)\n\nnot Antecede(rowe, dorri)\n\nnot Palter(rowe, dorri) -> Antecede(rowe, dorri) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The fiann divulge the malkah. The malkah faze the wyndham. The wyndham faze the fiann. If something divulge the malkah then it hark the malkah. If something divulge the wyndham and the wyndham is not uncarved then it faze the fiann. If something hark the malkah then it does not visit the fiann. If the wyndham is uncarved and the wyndham does not chase the fiann then the fiann divulge the wyndham. If the wyndham does not chase the malkah then the wyndham faze the malkah. If the wyndham divulge the fiann then the wyndham faze the malkah. The malkah is round.", "logic": "\nDivulge(fiann, malkah)\nFaze(malkah, wyndham)\nFaze(wyndham, fiann)\nforall x (Divulge(x, malkah) -> Hark(x, malkah))\nforall x (Divulge(x, wyndham) and not Uncarved(wyndham) -> Faze(x, fiann))\nforall x (Hark(x, malkah) -> not Divulge(x, fiann))\nUncarved(wyndham) and not Hark(wyndham, fiann) -> Divulge(fiann, wyndham)\nnot Hark(wyndham, malkah) -> Faze(wyndham, malkah)\nDivulge(wyndham, fiann) -> Faze(wyndham, malkah)\n\nRound(malkah)\n\nRound(malkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The tito rectify the brianne. The brianne inhale the jessika. The jessika inhale the tito. If something rectify the brianne then it cede the brianne. If something rectify the jessika and the jessika is not cardboard then it inhale the tito. If something cede the brianne then it does not visit the tito. If the jessika is cardboard and the jessika does not chase the tito then the tito rectify the jessika. If the jessika does not chase the brianne then the jessika inhale the brianne. If the jessika rectify the tito then the jessika inhale the brianne. The jessika does not visit the brianne.", "logic": "\nRectify(tito, brianne)\nInhale(brianne, jessika)\nInhale(jessika, tito)\nforall x (Rectify(x, brianne) -> Cede(x, brianne))\nforall x (Rectify(x, jessika) and not Cardboard(jessika) -> Inhale(x, tito))\nforall x (Cede(x, brianne) -> not Rectify(x, tito))\nCardboard(jessika) and not Cede(jessika, tito) -> Rectify(tito, jessika)\nnot Cede(jessika, brianne) -> Inhale(jessika, brianne)\nRectify(jessika, tito) -> Inhale(jessika, brianne)\n\nnot Rectify(jessika, brianne)\n\nnot Rectify(jessika, brianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The quinta disco the andonis. The andonis nominate the frans. The frans nominate the quinta. If something disco the andonis then it busy the andonis. If something disco the frans and the frans is not awned then it nominate the quinta. If something busy the andonis then it does not visit the quinta. If the frans is awned and the frans does not chase the quinta then the quinta disco the frans. If the frans does not chase the andonis then the frans nominate the andonis. If the frans disco the quinta then the frans nominate the andonis. The quinta nominate the frans.", "logic": "\nDisco(quinta, andonis)\nNominate(andonis, frans)\nNominate(frans, quinta)\nforall x (Disco(x, andonis) -> Busy(x, andonis))\nforall x (Disco(x, frans) and not Awned(frans) -> Nominate(x, quinta))\nforall x (Busy(x, andonis) -> not Disco(x, quinta))\nAwned(frans) and not Busy(frans, quinta) -> Disco(quinta, frans)\nnot Busy(frans, andonis) -> Nominate(frans, andonis)\nDisco(frans, quinta) -> Nominate(frans, andonis)\n\nNominate(quinta, frans)\n\nNominate(quinta, frans) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1410"} {"premises": "The angelique is travelled. The chrystel is abject. The chrystel is neighborly. If something acidulate the chrystel and it authorise the angelique then the angelique acidulate the chrystel. If something is neighborly then it acidulate the angelique. If something conk the angelique then the angelique acidulate the chrystel. If something conk the angelique then it acidulate the angelique. If something is abject then it conk the angelique. If something is downstage then it acidulate the angelique. The angelique is travelled.", "logic": "\nTravelled(angelique)\nAbject(chrystel)\nNeighborly(chrystel)\nforall x (Acidulate(x, chrystel) and Authorise(x, angelique) -> Acidulate(angelique, chrystel))\nforall x (Neighborly(x) -> Acidulate(x, angelique))\nforall x (Conk(x, angelique) -> Acidulate(angelique, chrystel))\nforall x (Conk(x, angelique) -> Acidulate(x, angelique))\nforall x (Abject(x) -> Conk(x, angelique))\nforall x (Downstage(x) -> Acidulate(x, angelique))\n\nTravelled(angelique)\n\ntherefore Travelled(angelique)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The jeanelle is spirant. The anastasie is headstrong. The anastasie is deafened. If something decline the anastasie and it dope the jeanelle then the jeanelle decline the anastasie. If something is deafened then it decline the jeanelle. If something roar the jeanelle then the jeanelle decline the anastasie. If something roar the jeanelle then it decline the jeanelle. If something is headstrong then it roar the jeanelle. If something is undamaged then it decline the jeanelle. The anastasie is not deafened.", "logic": "\nSpirant(jeanelle)\nHeadstrong(anastasie)\nDeafened(anastasie)\nforall x (Decline(x, anastasie) and Dope(x, jeanelle) -> Decline(jeanelle, anastasie))\nforall x (Deafened(x) -> Decline(x, jeanelle))\nforall x (Roar(x, jeanelle) -> Decline(jeanelle, anastasie))\nforall x (Roar(x, jeanelle) -> Decline(x, jeanelle))\nforall x (Headstrong(x) -> Roar(x, jeanelle))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) -> Decline(x, jeanelle))\n\nnot Deafened(anastasie)\n\ntherefore Deafened(anastasie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The benito is slighting. The clarie is arched. The clarie is matte. If something shake the clarie and it color the benito then the benito shake the clarie. If something is matte then it shake the benito. If something headline the benito then the benito shake the clarie. If something headline the benito then it shake the benito. If something is arched then it headline the benito. If something is unneeded then it shake the benito. The clarie shake the benito.", "logic": "\nSlighting(benito)\nArched(clarie)\nMatte(clarie)\nforall x (Shake(x, clarie) and Color(x, benito) -> Shake(benito, clarie))\nforall x (Matte(x) -> Shake(x, benito))\nforall x (Headline(x, benito) -> Shake(benito, clarie))\nforall x (Headline(x, benito) -> Shake(x, benito))\nforall x (Arched(x) -> Headline(x, benito))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> Shake(x, benito))\n\nShake(clarie, benito)\n\nMatte(clarie) and forall x (Matte(x) -> Shake(x, benito)) -> therefore Shake(clarie, benito)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The pepito is terminated. The elladine is relaxant. The elladine is pragmatic. If something boss the elladine and it puddle the pepito then the pepito boss the elladine. If something is pragmatic then it boss the pepito. If something nuke the pepito then the pepito boss the elladine. If something nuke the pepito then it boss the pepito. If something is relaxant then it nuke the pepito. If something is assumptive then it boss the pepito. The elladine does not need the pepito.", "logic": "\nTerminated(pepito)\nRelaxant(elladine)\nPragmatic(elladine)\nforall x (Boss(x, elladine) and Puddle(x, pepito) -> Boss(pepito, elladine))\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) -> Boss(x, pepito))\nforall x (Nuke(x, pepito) -> Boss(pepito, elladine))\nforall x (Nuke(x, pepito) -> Boss(x, pepito))\nforall x (Relaxant(x) -> Nuke(x, pepito))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) -> Boss(x, pepito))\n\nnot Nuke(elladine, pepito)\n\nRelaxant(elladine) and forall x (Relaxant(x) -> Nuke(x, pepito)) -> therefore Nuke(elladine, pepito)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The bobinette is hibernal. The ruby is levantine. The ruby is clockwise. If something vulgarize the ruby and it tenant the bobinette then the bobinette vulgarize the ruby. If something is clockwise then it vulgarize the bobinette. If something drug the bobinette then the bobinette vulgarize the ruby. If something drug the bobinette then it vulgarize the bobinette. If something is levantine then it drug the bobinette. If something is myalgic then it vulgarize the bobinette. The bobinette vulgarize the ruby.", "logic": "\nHibernal(bobinette)\nLevantine(ruby)\nClockwise(ruby)\nforall x (Vulgarize(x, ruby) and Tenant(x, bobinette) -> Vulgarize(bobinette, ruby))\nforall x (Clockwise(x) -> Vulgarize(x, bobinette))\nforall x (Drug(x, bobinette) -> Vulgarize(bobinette, ruby))\nforall x (Drug(x, bobinette) -> Vulgarize(x, bobinette))\nforall x (Levantine(x) -> Drug(x, bobinette))\nforall x (Myalgic(x) -> Vulgarize(x, bobinette))\n\nVulgarize(bobinette, ruby)\n\nLevantine(ruby) and forall x (Levantine(x) -> Drug(x, bobinette)) -> therefore Drug(ruby, bobinette) Drug(ruby, bobinette) and forall x (Drug(x, bobinette) -> Vulgarize(bobinette, ruby)) -> therefore Vulgarize(bobinette, ruby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The moria is facile. The hans is myotonic. The hans is definitive. If something aggregate the hans and it fink the moria then the moria aggregate the hans. If something is definitive then it aggregate the moria. If something heap the moria then the moria aggregate the hans. If something heap the moria then it aggregate the moria. If something is myotonic then it heap the moria. If something is handed then it aggregate the moria. The moria does not like the hans.", "logic": "\nFacile(moria)\nMyotonic(hans)\nDefinitive(hans)\nforall x (Aggregate(x, hans) and Fink(x, moria) -> Aggregate(moria, hans))\nforall x (Definitive(x) -> Aggregate(x, moria))\nforall x (Heap(x, moria) -> Aggregate(moria, hans))\nforall x (Heap(x, moria) -> Aggregate(x, moria))\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Heap(x, moria))\nforall x (Handed(x) -> Aggregate(x, moria))\n\nnot Aggregate(moria, hans)\n\nMyotonic(hans) and forall x (Myotonic(x) -> Heap(x, moria)) -> therefore Heap(hans, moria) Heap(hans, moria) and forall x (Heap(x, moria) -> Aggregate(moria, hans)) -> therefore Aggregate(moria, hans)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The pepe is abusive. The calypso is unfinished. The calypso is spirited. If something wither the calypso and it introduce the pepe then the pepe wither the calypso. If something is spirited then it wither the pepe. If something toll the pepe then the pepe wither the calypso. If something toll the pepe then it wither the pepe. If something is unfinished then it toll the pepe. If something is eclectic then it wither the pepe. The pepe does not like the pepe.", "logic": "\nAbusive(pepe)\nUnfinished(calypso)\nSpirited(calypso)\nforall x (Wither(x, calypso) and Introduce(x, pepe) -> Wither(pepe, calypso))\nforall x (Spirited(x) -> Wither(x, pepe))\nforall x (Toll(x, pepe) -> Wither(pepe, calypso))\nforall x (Toll(x, pepe) -> Wither(x, pepe))\nforall x (Unfinished(x) -> Toll(x, pepe))\nforall x (Eclectic(x) -> Wither(x, pepe))\n\nnot Wither(pepe, pepe)\n\nforall x (Toll(x, pepe) -> Wither(x, pepe)) <- forall x (Unfinished(x) -> Toll(x, pepe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The charity is swazi. The erwin is reflective. The erwin is ringed. If something face the erwin and it paddle the charity then the charity face the erwin. If something is ringed then it face the charity. If something flute the charity then the charity face the erwin. If something flute the charity then it face the charity. If something is reflective then it flute the charity. If something is certain then it face the charity. The charity flute the charity.", "logic": "\nSwazi(charity)\nReflective(erwin)\nRinged(erwin)\nforall x (Face(x, erwin) and Paddle(x, charity) -> Face(charity, erwin))\nforall x (Ringed(x) -> Face(x, charity))\nforall x (Flute(x, charity) -> Face(charity, erwin))\nforall x (Flute(x, charity) -> Face(x, charity))\nforall x (Reflective(x) -> Flute(x, charity))\nforall x (Certain(x) -> Face(x, charity))\n\nFlute(charity, charity)\n\nforall x (Reflective(x) -> Flute(x, charity)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The happy is botonnee. The nessi is braggy. The nessi is watercress. If something aggravate the nessi and it affront the happy then the happy aggravate the nessi. If something is watercress then it aggravate the happy. If something still the happy then the happy aggravate the nessi. If something still the happy then it aggravate the happy. If something is braggy then it still the happy. If something is edematous then it aggravate the happy. The happy is not braggy.", "logic": "\nBotonnee(happy)\nBraggy(nessi)\nWatercress(nessi)\nforall x (Aggravate(x, nessi) and Affront(x, happy) -> Aggravate(happy, nessi))\nforall x (Watercress(x) -> Aggravate(x, happy))\nforall x (Still(x, happy) -> Aggravate(happy, nessi))\nforall x (Still(x, happy) -> Aggravate(x, happy))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Still(x, happy))\nforall x (Edematous(x) -> Aggravate(x, happy))\n\nnot Braggy(happy)\n\nnot Braggy(happy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The magdalen is farther. The patrick is anaemic. The patrick is enteric. If something carburise the patrick and it railroad the magdalen then the magdalen carburise the patrick. If something is enteric then it carburise the magdalen. If something renegade the magdalen then the magdalen carburise the patrick. If something renegade the magdalen then it carburise the magdalen. If something is anaemic then it renegade the magdalen. If something is dyspnoeic then it carburise the magdalen. The patrick carburise the patrick.", "logic": "\nFarther(magdalen)\nAnaemic(patrick)\nEnteric(patrick)\nforall x (Carburise(x, patrick) and Railroad(x, magdalen) -> Carburise(magdalen, patrick))\nforall x (Enteric(x) -> Carburise(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Renegade(x, magdalen) -> Carburise(magdalen, patrick))\nforall x (Renegade(x, magdalen) -> Carburise(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Renegade(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> Carburise(x, magdalen))\n\nCarburise(patrick, patrick)\n\nCarburise(patrick, patrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The chevy is asleep. The margot is visualized. The margot is tawny. If something twitch the margot and it hymn the chevy then the chevy twitch the margot. If something is tawny then it twitch the chevy. If something curtain the chevy then the chevy twitch the margot. If something curtain the chevy then it twitch the chevy. If something is visualized then it curtain the chevy. If something is uveal then it twitch the chevy. The chevy does not need the margot.", "logic": "\nAsleep(chevy)\nVisualized(margot)\nTawny(margot)\nforall x (Twitch(x, margot) and Hymn(x, chevy) -> Twitch(chevy, margot))\nforall x (Tawny(x) -> Twitch(x, chevy))\nforall x (Curtain(x, chevy) -> Twitch(chevy, margot))\nforall x (Curtain(x, chevy) -> Twitch(x, chevy))\nforall x (Visualized(x) -> Curtain(x, chevy))\nforall x (Uveal(x) -> Twitch(x, chevy))\n\nnot Curtain(chevy, margot)\n\nnot Curtain(chevy, margot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "The suzanna is playable. The worth is delusional. The worth is jolty. If something paddle the worth and it burden the suzanna then the suzanna paddle the worth. If something is jolty then it paddle the suzanna. If something humiliate the suzanna then the suzanna paddle the worth. If something humiliate the suzanna then it paddle the suzanna. If something is delusional then it humiliate the suzanna. If something is formless then it paddle the suzanna. The worth is formless.", "logic": "\nPlayable(suzanna)\nDelusional(worth)\nJolty(worth)\nforall x (Paddle(x, worth) and Burden(x, suzanna) -> Paddle(suzanna, worth))\nforall x (Jolty(x) -> Paddle(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Humiliate(x, suzanna) -> Paddle(suzanna, worth))\nforall x (Humiliate(x, suzanna) -> Paddle(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Delusional(x) -> Humiliate(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Formless(x) -> Paddle(x, suzanna))\n\nFormless(worth)\n\nFormless(worth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-365"} {"premises": "Maxim is dowdy. Maxim is fantastic. Bernardo is telluric. Bernardo is anthropic. Bernardo is not modish. Annnora is droll. Annnora is modish. If Maxim is dowdy then Maxim is telluric. All fantastic, telluric things are cypriot. Red, modish things are not telluric. Bernardo is telluric.", "logic": "\nDowdy(maxim)\nFantastic(maxim)\nTelluric(bernardo)\nAnthropic(bernardo)\nnot Modish(bernardo)\nDroll(annnora)\nModish(annnora)\nDowdy(maxim) -> Telluric(maxim)\nforall x (Fantastic(x) and Telluric(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) and Modish(x) -> not Telluric(x))\n\nTelluric(bernardo)\n\ntherefore Telluric(bernardo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Barry is anisogamic. Barry is hydraulic. Neila is siliceous. Neila is splashy. Neila is not archaic. Levi is colicky. Levi is archaic. If Barry is anisogamic then Barry is siliceous. All hydraulic, siliceous things are habitable. Red, archaic things are not siliceous. Neila is not splashy.", "logic": "\nAnisogamic(barry)\nHydraulic(barry)\nSiliceous(neila)\nSplashy(neila)\nnot Archaic(neila)\nColicky(levi)\nArchaic(levi)\nAnisogamic(barry) -> Siliceous(barry)\nforall x (Hydraulic(x) and Siliceous(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Hydraulic(x) and Archaic(x) -> not Siliceous(x))\n\nnot Splashy(neila)\n\ntherefore Splashy(neila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Zippy is uncleared. Zippy is dedicated. Opal is game. Opal is seamless. Opal is not abbatial. Saunders is cacodylic. Saunders is abbatial. If Zippy is uncleared then Zippy is game. All dedicated, game things are mercuric. Red, abbatial things are not game. Zippy is game.", "logic": "\nUncleared(zippy)\nDedicated(zippy)\nGame(opal)\nSeamless(opal)\nnot Abbatial(opal)\nCacodylic(saunders)\nAbbatial(saunders)\nUncleared(zippy) -> Game(zippy)\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and Game(x) -> Mercuric(x))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and Abbatial(x) -> not Game(x))\n\nGame(zippy)\n\nUncleared(zippy) and Uncleared(zippy) -> Game(zippy) -> therefore Game(zippy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Tomiko is germfree. Tomiko is blatant. Ulric is ocellated. Ulric is stung. Ulric is not wondrous. Billi is seljuk. Billi is wondrous. If Tomiko is germfree then Tomiko is ocellated. All blatant, ocellated things are five. Red, wondrous things are not ocellated. Tomiko is not ocellated.", "logic": "\nGermfree(tomiko)\nBlatant(tomiko)\nOcellated(ulric)\nStung(ulric)\nnot Wondrous(ulric)\nSeljuk(billi)\nWondrous(billi)\nGermfree(tomiko) -> Ocellated(tomiko)\nforall x (Blatant(x) and Ocellated(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Blatant(x) and Wondrous(x) -> not Ocellated(x))\n\nnot Ocellated(tomiko)\n\nGermfree(tomiko) and Germfree(tomiko) -> Ocellated(tomiko) -> therefore Ocellated(tomiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Rubetta is chalky. Rubetta is hydroxy. Oswald is soviet. Oswald is underlying. Oswald is not plowed. Madelle is involved. Madelle is plowed. If Rubetta is chalky then Rubetta is soviet. All hydroxy, soviet things are lyrical. Red, plowed things are not soviet. Rubetta is lyrical.", "logic": "\nChalky(rubetta)\nHydroxy(rubetta)\nSoviet(oswald)\nUnderlying(oswald)\nnot Plowed(oswald)\nInvolved(madelle)\nPlowed(madelle)\nChalky(rubetta) -> Soviet(rubetta)\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) and Soviet(x) -> Lyrical(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) and Plowed(x) -> not Soviet(x))\n\nLyrical(rubetta)\n\nChalky(rubetta) and Chalky(rubetta) -> Soviet(rubetta) -> therefore Soviet(rubetta) Hydroxy(rubetta) and Soviet(rubetta) and forall x (Hydroxy(x) and Soviet(x) -> Lyrical(x)) -> therefore Lyrical(rubetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Dyana is grenadian. Dyana is vaporish. Rhiamon is diatonic. Rhiamon is orthodox. Rhiamon is not controlled. Serge is wisplike. Serge is controlled. If Dyana is grenadian then Dyana is diatonic. All vaporish, diatonic things are spinnbar. Red, controlled things are not diatonic. Dyana is not spinnbar.", "logic": "\nGrenadian(dyana)\nVaporish(dyana)\nDiatonic(rhiamon)\nOrthodox(rhiamon)\nnot Controlled(rhiamon)\nWisplike(serge)\nControlled(serge)\nGrenadian(dyana) -> Diatonic(dyana)\nforall x (Vaporish(x) and Diatonic(x) -> Spinnbar(x))\nforall x (Vaporish(x) and Controlled(x) -> not Diatonic(x))\n\nnot Spinnbar(dyana)\n\nGrenadian(dyana) and Grenadian(dyana) -> Diatonic(dyana) -> therefore Diatonic(dyana) Vaporish(dyana) and Diatonic(dyana) and forall x (Vaporish(x) and Diatonic(x) -> Spinnbar(x)) -> therefore Spinnbar(dyana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Bing is hardened. Bing is implanted. Ariel is printable. Ariel is prepupal. Ariel is not existent. Hannah is measured. Hannah is existent. If Bing is hardened then Bing is printable. All implanted, printable things are esoteric. Red, existent things are not printable. Ariel is not esoteric.", "logic": "\nHardened(bing)\nImplanted(bing)\nPrintable(ariel)\nPrepupal(ariel)\nnot Existent(ariel)\nMeasured(hannah)\nExistent(hannah)\nHardened(bing) -> Printable(bing)\nforall x (Implanted(x) and Printable(x) -> Esoteric(x))\nforall x (Implanted(x) and Existent(x) -> not Printable(x))\n\nnot Esoteric(ariel)\n\nforall x (Implanted(x) and Printable(x) -> Esoteric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Jesse is staminate. Jesse is duplicable. Corwin is cubic. Corwin is standby. Corwin is not sprawling. Orella is auxiliary. Orella is sprawling. If Jesse is staminate then Jesse is cubic. All duplicable, cubic things are mesmeric. Red, sprawling things are not cubic. Orella is mesmeric.", "logic": "\nStaminate(jesse)\nDuplicable(jesse)\nCubic(corwin)\nStandby(corwin)\nnot Sprawling(corwin)\nAuxiliary(orella)\nSprawling(orella)\nStaminate(jesse) -> Cubic(jesse)\nforall x (Duplicable(x) and Cubic(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Duplicable(x) and Sprawling(x) -> not Cubic(x))\n\nMesmeric(orella)\n\nforall x (Duplicable(x) and Cubic(x) -> Mesmeric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Lelia is singsong. Lelia is soiled. Dorella is abortive. Dorella is neurotic. Dorella is not honorific. Shandra is precooked. Shandra is honorific. If Lelia is singsong then Lelia is abortive. All soiled, abortive things are thenal. Red, honorific things are not abortive. Shandra is not neurotic.", "logic": "\nSingsong(lelia)\nSoiled(lelia)\nAbortive(dorella)\nNeurotic(dorella)\nnot Honorific(dorella)\nPrecooked(shandra)\nHonorific(shandra)\nSingsong(lelia) -> Abortive(lelia)\nforall x (Soiled(x) and Abortive(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Soiled(x) and Honorific(x) -> not Abortive(x))\n\nnot Neurotic(shandra)\n\nnot Neurotic(shandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Danielle is isotopic. Danielle is geodesical. Phelia is unresolved. Phelia is pleased. Phelia is not autonomous. Pansy is sensitive. Pansy is autonomous. If Danielle is isotopic then Danielle is unresolved. All geodesical, unresolved things are fiddling. Red, autonomous things are not unresolved. Danielle is pleased.", "logic": "\nIsotopic(danielle)\nGeodesical(danielle)\nUnresolved(phelia)\nPleased(phelia)\nnot Autonomous(phelia)\nSensitive(pansy)\nAutonomous(pansy)\nIsotopic(danielle) -> Unresolved(danielle)\nforall x (Geodesical(x) and Unresolved(x) -> Fiddling(x))\nforall x (Geodesical(x) and Autonomous(x) -> not Unresolved(x))\n\nPleased(danielle)\n\nPleased(danielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Lyndy is nettlesome. Lyndy is celestial. Pier is unsworn. Pier is satisfying. Pier is not penetrable. Dorelia is sprawly. Dorelia is penetrable. If Lyndy is nettlesome then Lyndy is unsworn. All celestial, unsworn things are slight. Red, penetrable things are not unsworn. Dorelia is not celestial.", "logic": "\nNettlesome(lyndy)\nCelestial(lyndy)\nUnsworn(pier)\nSatisfying(pier)\nnot Penetrable(pier)\nSprawly(dorelia)\nPenetrable(dorelia)\nNettlesome(lyndy) -> Unsworn(lyndy)\nforall x (Celestial(x) and Unsworn(x) -> Slight(x))\nforall x (Celestial(x) and Penetrable(x) -> not Unsworn(x))\n\nnot Celestial(dorelia)\n\nnot Celestial(dorelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Darrell is unfamiliar. Darrell is bracteate. Kelli is mailed. Kelli is insured. Kelli is not zeroth. Dorey is cancerous. Dorey is zeroth. If Darrell is unfamiliar then Darrell is mailed. All bracteate, mailed things are maternal. Red, zeroth things are not mailed. Kelli is unfamiliar.", "logic": "\nUnfamiliar(darrell)\nBracteate(darrell)\nMailed(kelli)\nInsured(kelli)\nnot Zeroth(kelli)\nCancerous(dorey)\nZeroth(dorey)\nUnfamiliar(darrell) -> Mailed(darrell)\nforall x (Bracteate(x) and Mailed(x) -> Maternal(x))\nforall x (Bracteate(x) and Zeroth(x) -> not Mailed(x))\n\nUnfamiliar(kelli)\n\nUnfamiliar(kelli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-39"} {"premises": "Patin is not heroical. Patin is boundless. Adolfo is unparented. Adolfo is irruptive. Adolfo is enhancive. Adolfo is not continuant. Adolfo is heroical. Adolfo is not spooky. Adolfo is boundless. Jonah is unparented. Jonah is not irruptive. Jonah is spooky. Jonah is boundless. Clovis is continuant. Clovis is boundless. Red, irruptive things are not heroical. If something is irruptive and unparented then it is enhancive. Red things are not enhancive. White things are continuant. Quiet things are unparented. All spooky, irruptive things are unparented. If something is enhancive and continuant then it is not boundless. If something is heroical and not enhancive then it is not boundless. Jonah is spooky.", "logic": "\nnot Heroical(patin)\nBoundless(patin)\nUnparented(adolfo)\nIrruptive(adolfo)\nEnhancive(adolfo)\nnot Continuant(adolfo)\nHeroical(adolfo)\nnot Spooky(adolfo)\nBoundless(adolfo)\nUnparented(jonah)\nnot Irruptive(jonah)\nSpooky(jonah)\nBoundless(jonah)\nContinuant(clovis)\nBoundless(clovis)\nforall x (Continuant(x) and Irruptive(x) -> not Heroical(x))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) and Unparented(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> not Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Spooky(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Unparented(x))\nforall x (Spooky(x) and Irruptive(x) -> Unparented(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) and Continuant(x) -> not Boundless(x))\nforall x (Heroical(x) and not Enhancive(x) -> not Boundless(x))\n\nSpooky(jonah)\n\ntherefore Spooky(jonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Mikael is not waterless. Mikael is excitatory. Roscoe is smutty. Roscoe is detractive. Roscoe is aflutter. Roscoe is not unturned. Roscoe is waterless. Roscoe is not rotatable. Roscoe is excitatory. Arne is smutty. Arne is not detractive. Arne is rotatable. Arne is excitatory. Carmella is unturned. Carmella is excitatory. Red, detractive things are not waterless. If something is detractive and smutty then it is aflutter. Red things are not aflutter. White things are unturned. Quiet things are smutty. All rotatable, detractive things are smutty. If something is aflutter and unturned then it is not excitatory. If something is waterless and not aflutter then it is not excitatory. Arne is not excitatory.", "logic": "\nnot Waterless(mikael)\nExcitatory(mikael)\nSmutty(roscoe)\nDetractive(roscoe)\nAflutter(roscoe)\nnot Unturned(roscoe)\nWaterless(roscoe)\nnot Rotatable(roscoe)\nExcitatory(roscoe)\nSmutty(arne)\nnot Detractive(arne)\nRotatable(arne)\nExcitatory(arne)\nUnturned(carmella)\nExcitatory(carmella)\nforall x (Unturned(x) and Detractive(x) -> not Waterless(x))\nforall x (Detractive(x) and Smutty(x) -> Aflutter(x))\nforall x (Unturned(x) -> not Aflutter(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) -> Unturned(x))\nforall x (Aflutter(x) -> Smutty(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and Detractive(x) -> Smutty(x))\nforall x (Aflutter(x) and Unturned(x) -> not Excitatory(x))\nforall x (Waterless(x) and not Aflutter(x) -> not Excitatory(x))\n\nnot Excitatory(arne)\n\ntherefore Excitatory(arne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Jany is not patronless. Jany is vaginal. Ravil is portrayed. Ravil is immodest. Ravil is forward. Ravil is not east. Ravil is patronless. Ravil is not virtual. Ravil is vaginal. Inci is portrayed. Inci is not immodest. Inci is virtual. Inci is vaginal. Teodoro is east. Teodoro is vaginal. Red, immodest things are not patronless. If something is immodest and portrayed then it is forward. Red things are not forward. White things are east. Quiet things are portrayed. All virtual, immodest things are portrayed. If something is forward and east then it is not vaginal. If something is patronless and not forward then it is not vaginal. Inci is east.", "logic": "\nnot Patronless(jany)\nVaginal(jany)\nPortrayed(ravil)\nImmodest(ravil)\nForward(ravil)\nnot East(ravil)\nPatronless(ravil)\nnot Virtual(ravil)\nVaginal(ravil)\nPortrayed(inci)\nnot Immodest(inci)\nVirtual(inci)\nVaginal(inci)\nEast(teodoro)\nVaginal(teodoro)\nforall x (East(x) and Immodest(x) -> not Patronless(x))\nforall x (Immodest(x) and Portrayed(x) -> Forward(x))\nforall x (East(x) -> not Forward(x))\nforall x (Virtual(x) -> East(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Virtual(x) and Immodest(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) and East(x) -> not Vaginal(x))\nforall x (Patronless(x) and not Forward(x) -> not Vaginal(x))\n\nEast(inci)\n\nVirtual(inci) and forall x (Virtual(x) -> East(x)) -> therefore East(inci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Ainslee is not signal. Ainslee is skinless. Thorsten is unmalted. Thorsten is blotchy. Thorsten is fattened. Thorsten is not mercerized. Thorsten is signal. Thorsten is not circadian. Thorsten is skinless. Collette is unmalted. Collette is not blotchy. Collette is circadian. Collette is skinless. Cobby is mercerized. Cobby is skinless. Red, blotchy things are not signal. If something is blotchy and unmalted then it is fattened. Red things are not fattened. White things are mercerized. Quiet things are unmalted. All circadian, blotchy things are unmalted. If something is fattened and mercerized then it is not skinless. If something is signal and not fattened then it is not skinless. Cobby is fattened.", "logic": "\nnot Signal(ainslee)\nSkinless(ainslee)\nUnmalted(thorsten)\nBlotchy(thorsten)\nFattened(thorsten)\nnot Mercerized(thorsten)\nSignal(thorsten)\nnot Circadian(thorsten)\nSkinless(thorsten)\nUnmalted(collette)\nnot Blotchy(collette)\nCircadian(collette)\nSkinless(collette)\nMercerized(cobby)\nSkinless(cobby)\nforall x (Mercerized(x) and Blotchy(x) -> not Signal(x))\nforall x (Blotchy(x) and Unmalted(x) -> Fattened(x))\nforall x (Mercerized(x) -> not Fattened(x))\nforall x (Circadian(x) -> Mercerized(x))\nforall x (Fattened(x) -> Unmalted(x))\nforall x (Circadian(x) and Blotchy(x) -> Unmalted(x))\nforall x (Fattened(x) and Mercerized(x) -> not Skinless(x))\nforall x (Signal(x) and not Fattened(x) -> not Skinless(x))\n\nFattened(cobby)\n\nMercerized(cobby) and forall x (Mercerized(x) -> not Fattened(x)) -> therefore not Fattened(cobby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Lowell is not calicular. Lowell is erasmian. Angelica is dyslectic. Angelica is nocturnal. Angelica is crosswise. Angelica is not histrionic. Angelica is calicular. Angelica is not unusable. Angelica is erasmian. Halvard is dyslectic. Halvard is not nocturnal. Halvard is unusable. Halvard is erasmian. Dinah is histrionic. Dinah is erasmian. Red, nocturnal things are not calicular. If something is nocturnal and dyslectic then it is crosswise. Red things are not crosswise. White things are histrionic. Quiet things are dyslectic. All unusable, nocturnal things are dyslectic. If something is crosswise and histrionic then it is not erasmian. If something is calicular and not crosswise then it is not erasmian. Halvard is not crosswise.", "logic": "\nnot Calicular(lowell)\nErasmian(lowell)\nDyslectic(angelica)\nNocturnal(angelica)\nCrosswise(angelica)\nnot Histrionic(angelica)\nCalicular(angelica)\nnot Unusable(angelica)\nErasmian(angelica)\nDyslectic(halvard)\nnot Nocturnal(halvard)\nUnusable(halvard)\nErasmian(halvard)\nHistrionic(dinah)\nErasmian(dinah)\nforall x (Histrionic(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> not Calicular(x))\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) and Dyslectic(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Histrionic(x) -> not Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Unusable(x) -> Histrionic(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) -> Dyslectic(x))\nforall x (Unusable(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> Dyslectic(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and Histrionic(x) -> not Erasmian(x))\nforall x (Calicular(x) and not Crosswise(x) -> not Erasmian(x))\n\nnot Crosswise(halvard)\n\nUnusable(halvard) and forall x (Unusable(x) -> Histrionic(x)) -> therefore Histrionic(halvard) Histrionic(halvard) and forall x (Histrionic(x) -> not Crosswise(x)) -> therefore not Crosswise(halvard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Tymon is not wormy. Tymon is basal. Buffy is cosmic. Buffy is peaked. Buffy is brazilian. Buffy is not repayable. Buffy is wormy. Buffy is not structured. Buffy is basal. Neda is cosmic. Neda is not peaked. Neda is structured. Neda is basal. Yolane is repayable. Yolane is basal. Red, peaked things are not wormy. If something is peaked and cosmic then it is brazilian. Red things are not brazilian. White things are repayable. Quiet things are cosmic. All structured, peaked things are cosmic. If something is brazilian and repayable then it is not basal. If something is wormy and not brazilian then it is not basal. Neda is brazilian.", "logic": "\nnot Wormy(tymon)\nBasal(tymon)\nCosmic(buffy)\nPeaked(buffy)\nBrazilian(buffy)\nnot Repayable(buffy)\nWormy(buffy)\nnot Structured(buffy)\nBasal(buffy)\nCosmic(neda)\nnot Peaked(neda)\nStructured(neda)\nBasal(neda)\nRepayable(yolane)\nBasal(yolane)\nforall x (Repayable(x) and Peaked(x) -> not Wormy(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) and Cosmic(x) -> Brazilian(x))\nforall x (Repayable(x) -> not Brazilian(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) -> Repayable(x))\nforall x (Brazilian(x) -> Cosmic(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) and Peaked(x) -> Cosmic(x))\nforall x (Brazilian(x) and Repayable(x) -> not Basal(x))\nforall x (Wormy(x) and not Brazilian(x) -> not Basal(x))\n\nBrazilian(neda)\n\nStructured(neda) and forall x (Structured(x) -> Repayable(x)) -> therefore Repayable(neda) Repayable(neda) and forall x (Repayable(x) -> not Brazilian(x)) -> therefore not Brazilian(neda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Lucilia is not lucent. Lucilia is phony. Karyn is difficult. Karyn is admissible. Karyn is poor. Karyn is not queenly. Karyn is lucent. Karyn is not squinting. Karyn is phony. Willie is difficult. Willie is not admissible. Willie is squinting. Willie is phony. Ginnie is queenly. Ginnie is phony. Red, admissible things are not lucent. If something is admissible and difficult then it is poor. Red things are not poor. White things are queenly. Quiet things are difficult. All squinting, admissible things are difficult. If something is poor and queenly then it is not phony. If something is lucent and not poor then it is not phony. Lucilia is not difficult.", "logic": "\nnot Lucent(lucilia)\nPhony(lucilia)\nDifficult(karyn)\nAdmissible(karyn)\nPoor(karyn)\nnot Queenly(karyn)\nLucent(karyn)\nnot Squinting(karyn)\nPhony(karyn)\nDifficult(willie)\nnot Admissible(willie)\nSquinting(willie)\nPhony(willie)\nQueenly(ginnie)\nPhony(ginnie)\nforall x (Queenly(x) and Admissible(x) -> not Lucent(x))\nforall x (Admissible(x) and Difficult(x) -> Poor(x))\nforall x (Queenly(x) -> not Poor(x))\nforall x (Squinting(x) -> Queenly(x))\nforall x (Poor(x) -> Difficult(x))\nforall x (Squinting(x) and Admissible(x) -> Difficult(x))\nforall x (Poor(x) and Queenly(x) -> not Phony(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) and not Poor(x) -> not Phony(x))\n\nnot Difficult(lucilia)\n\nforall x (Poor(x) -> Difficult(x)) <- forall x (Admissible(x) and Difficult(x) -> Poor(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Dolorita is not guatemalan. Dolorita is stippled. Shurlocke is unreactive. Shurlocke is nodulose. Shurlocke is mastered. Shurlocke is not unmarred. Shurlocke is guatemalan. Shurlocke is not fond. Shurlocke is stippled. Eadith is unreactive. Eadith is not nodulose. Eadith is fond. Eadith is stippled. Rheta is unmarred. Rheta is stippled. Red, nodulose things are not guatemalan. If something is nodulose and unreactive then it is mastered. Red things are not mastered. White things are unmarred. Quiet things are unreactive. All fond, nodulose things are unreactive. If something is mastered and unmarred then it is not stippled. If something is guatemalan and not mastered then it is not stippled. Rheta is unreactive.", "logic": "\nnot Guatemalan(dolorita)\nStippled(dolorita)\nUnreactive(shurlocke)\nNodulose(shurlocke)\nMastered(shurlocke)\nnot Unmarred(shurlocke)\nGuatemalan(shurlocke)\nnot Fond(shurlocke)\nStippled(shurlocke)\nUnreactive(eadith)\nnot Nodulose(eadith)\nFond(eadith)\nStippled(eadith)\nUnmarred(rheta)\nStippled(rheta)\nforall x (Unmarred(x) and Nodulose(x) -> not Guatemalan(x))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) and Unreactive(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Unmarred(x) -> not Mastered(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) -> Unmarred(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) and Nodulose(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) and Unmarred(x) -> not Stippled(x))\nforall x (Guatemalan(x) and not Mastered(x) -> not Stippled(x))\n\nUnreactive(rheta)\n\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Unreactive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Siward is not jesuit. Siward is inquiring. Vladamir is fragmental. Vladamir is strapping. Vladamir is biologic. Vladamir is not cutting. Vladamir is jesuit. Vladamir is not afflictive. Vladamir is inquiring. Eben is fragmental. Eben is not strapping. Eben is afflictive. Eben is inquiring. Moore is cutting. Moore is inquiring. Red, strapping things are not jesuit. If something is strapping and fragmental then it is biologic. Red things are not biologic. White things are cutting. Quiet things are fragmental. All afflictive, strapping things are fragmental. If something is biologic and cutting then it is not inquiring. If something is jesuit and not biologic then it is not inquiring. Siward is not cutting.", "logic": "\nnot Jesuit(siward)\nInquiring(siward)\nFragmental(vladamir)\nStrapping(vladamir)\nBiologic(vladamir)\nnot Cutting(vladamir)\nJesuit(vladamir)\nnot Afflictive(vladamir)\nInquiring(vladamir)\nFragmental(eben)\nnot Strapping(eben)\nAfflictive(eben)\nInquiring(eben)\nCutting(moore)\nInquiring(moore)\nforall x (Cutting(x) and Strapping(x) -> not Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Strapping(x) and Fragmental(x) -> Biologic(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> not Biologic(x))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) -> Cutting(x))\nforall x (Biologic(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) and Strapping(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Biologic(x) and Cutting(x) -> not Inquiring(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) and not Biologic(x) -> not Inquiring(x))\n\nnot Cutting(siward)\n\nforall x (Afflictive(x) -> Cutting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Irma is not burdened. Irma is streaky. Darius is emergent. Darius is occluded. Darius is vowellike. Darius is not nuptial. Darius is burdened. Darius is not heartening. Darius is streaky. Annelise is emergent. Annelise is not occluded. Annelise is heartening. Annelise is streaky. Briteny is nuptial. Briteny is streaky. Red, occluded things are not burdened. If something is occluded and emergent then it is vowellike. Red things are not vowellike. White things are nuptial. Quiet things are emergent. All heartening, occluded things are emergent. If something is vowellike and nuptial then it is not streaky. If something is burdened and not vowellike then it is not streaky. Briteny is burdened.", "logic": "\nnot Burdened(irma)\nStreaky(irma)\nEmergent(darius)\nOccluded(darius)\nVowellike(darius)\nnot Nuptial(darius)\nBurdened(darius)\nnot Heartening(darius)\nStreaky(darius)\nEmergent(annelise)\nnot Occluded(annelise)\nHeartening(annelise)\nStreaky(annelise)\nNuptial(briteny)\nStreaky(briteny)\nforall x (Nuptial(x) and Occluded(x) -> not Burdened(x))\nforall x (Occluded(x) and Emergent(x) -> Vowellike(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> not Vowellike(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) and Occluded(x) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) and Nuptial(x) -> not Streaky(x))\nforall x (Burdened(x) and not Vowellike(x) -> not Streaky(x))\n\nBurdened(briteny)\n\nBurdened(briteny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Rosalyn is not fifteen. Rosalyn is sketchy. Sarine is liquescent. Sarine is askance. Sarine is deific. Sarine is not lxiv. Sarine is fifteen. Sarine is not skinless. Sarine is sketchy. Devonne is liquescent. Devonne is not askance. Devonne is skinless. Devonne is sketchy. Starlene is lxiv. Starlene is sketchy. Red, askance things are not fifteen. If something is askance and liquescent then it is deific. Red things are not deific. White things are lxiv. Quiet things are liquescent. All skinless, askance things are liquescent. If something is deific and lxiv then it is not sketchy. If something is fifteen and not deific then it is not sketchy. Devonne is not fifteen.", "logic": "\nnot Fifteen(rosalyn)\nSketchy(rosalyn)\nLiquescent(sarine)\nAskance(sarine)\nDeific(sarine)\nnot Lxiv(sarine)\nFifteen(sarine)\nnot Skinless(sarine)\nSketchy(sarine)\nLiquescent(devonne)\nnot Askance(devonne)\nSkinless(devonne)\nSketchy(devonne)\nLxiv(starlene)\nSketchy(starlene)\nforall x (Lxiv(x) and Askance(x) -> not Fifteen(x))\nforall x (Askance(x) and Liquescent(x) -> Deific(x))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) -> not Deific(x))\nforall x (Skinless(x) -> Lxiv(x))\nforall x (Deific(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Skinless(x) and Askance(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Deific(x) and Lxiv(x) -> not Sketchy(x))\nforall x (Fifteen(x) and not Deific(x) -> not Sketchy(x))\n\nnot Fifteen(devonne)\n\nnot Fifteen(devonne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Viola is not nonionised. Viola is humoral. Spike is bearded. Spike is extensive. Spike is nonresiny. Spike is not dreamed. Spike is nonionised. Spike is not succinct. Spike is humoral. Marlo is bearded. Marlo is not extensive. Marlo is succinct. Marlo is humoral. Ealasaid is dreamed. Ealasaid is humoral. Red, extensive things are not nonionised. If something is extensive and bearded then it is nonresiny. Red things are not nonresiny. White things are dreamed. Quiet things are bearded. All succinct, extensive things are bearded. If something is nonresiny and dreamed then it is not humoral. If something is nonionised and not nonresiny then it is not humoral. Ealasaid is succinct.", "logic": "\nnot Nonionised(viola)\nHumoral(viola)\nBearded(spike)\nExtensive(spike)\nNonresiny(spike)\nnot Dreamed(spike)\nNonionised(spike)\nnot Succinct(spike)\nHumoral(spike)\nBearded(marlo)\nnot Extensive(marlo)\nSuccinct(marlo)\nHumoral(marlo)\nDreamed(ealasaid)\nHumoral(ealasaid)\nforall x (Dreamed(x) and Extensive(x) -> not Nonionised(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Bearded(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Dreamed(x) -> not Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Dreamed(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) and Extensive(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Dreamed(x) -> not Humoral(x))\nforall x (Nonionised(x) and not Nonresiny(x) -> not Humoral(x))\n\nSuccinct(ealasaid)\n\nSuccinct(ealasaid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1087"} {"premises": "Antonina is preset. Antonina is eminent. Antonina is northern. Antonina is brasslike. Antonina is later. Nils is preset. Nils is jacksonian. Joletta is preset. Joletta is northern. Stephenie is brasslike. Green things are jacksonian. If something is first then it is brasslike. All jacksonian things are first. Nils is preset.", "logic": "\nPreset(antonina)\nEminent(antonina)\nNorthern(antonina)\nBrasslike(antonina)\nLater(antonina)\nPreset(nils)\nJacksonian(nils)\nPreset(joletta)\nNorthern(joletta)\nBrasslike(stephenie)\nforall x (First(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nforall x (First(x) -> Brasslike(x))\nforall x (Jacksonian(x) -> First(x))\n\nPreset(nils)\n\ntherefore Preset(nils)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Carita is aplanatic. Carita is suffusive. Carita is foreign. Carita is togged. Carita is campanular. Jephthah is aplanatic. Jephthah is dogged. Astra is aplanatic. Astra is foreign. Lucretia is togged. Green things are dogged. If something is aflutter then it is togged. All dogged things are aflutter. Astra is not aplanatic.", "logic": "\nAplanatic(carita)\nSuffusive(carita)\nForeign(carita)\nTogged(carita)\nCampanular(carita)\nAplanatic(jephthah)\nDogged(jephthah)\nAplanatic(astra)\nForeign(astra)\nTogged(lucretia)\nforall x (Aflutter(x) -> Dogged(x))\nforall x (Aflutter(x) -> Togged(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Aflutter(x))\n\nnot Aplanatic(astra)\n\ntherefore Aplanatic(astra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Aleta is nomothetic. Aleta is stomachic. Aleta is colorless. Aleta is horned. Aleta is puppylike. Karylin is nomothetic. Karylin is repentant. Samuele is nomothetic. Samuele is colorless. Herbert is horned. Green things are repentant. If something is robotic then it is horned. All repentant things are robotic. Karylin is robotic.", "logic": "\nNomothetic(aleta)\nStomachic(aleta)\nColorless(aleta)\nHorned(aleta)\nPuppylike(aleta)\nNomothetic(karylin)\nRepentant(karylin)\nNomothetic(samuele)\nColorless(samuele)\nHorned(herbert)\nforall x (Robotic(x) -> Repentant(x))\nforall x (Robotic(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Robotic(x))\n\nRobotic(karylin)\n\nRepentant(karylin) and forall x (Repentant(x) -> Robotic(x)) -> therefore Robotic(karylin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Tobye is seriocomic. Tobye is bullheaded. Tobye is exiguous. Tobye is antithetic. Tobye is harmonical. Heinrich is seriocomic. Heinrich is curvey. Fletch is seriocomic. Fletch is exiguous. Clea is antithetic. Green things are curvey. If something is potbound then it is antithetic. All curvey things are potbound. Heinrich is not potbound.", "logic": "\nSeriocomic(tobye)\nBullheaded(tobye)\nExiguous(tobye)\nAntithetic(tobye)\nHarmonical(tobye)\nSeriocomic(heinrich)\nCurvey(heinrich)\nSeriocomic(fletch)\nExiguous(fletch)\nAntithetic(clea)\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Potbound(x))\n\nnot Potbound(heinrich)\n\nCurvey(heinrich) and forall x (Curvey(x) -> Potbound(x)) -> therefore Potbound(heinrich)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Ralf is rotund. Ralf is metallic. Ralf is rentable. Ralf is epileptic. Ralf is angelical. Way is rotund. Way is disgraced. Veradis is rotund. Veradis is rentable. Woodie is epileptic. Green things are disgraced. If something is uppercase then it is epileptic. All disgraced things are uppercase. Way is epileptic.", "logic": "\nRotund(ralf)\nMetallic(ralf)\nRentable(ralf)\nEpileptic(ralf)\nAngelical(ralf)\nRotund(way)\nDisgraced(way)\nRotund(veradis)\nRentable(veradis)\nEpileptic(woodie)\nforall x (Uppercase(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Uppercase(x) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) -> Uppercase(x))\n\nEpileptic(way)\n\nDisgraced(way) and forall x (Disgraced(x) -> Uppercase(x)) -> therefore Uppercase(way) Uppercase(way) and forall x (Uppercase(x) -> Epileptic(x)) -> therefore Epileptic(way)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Taite is liked. Taite is agrarian. Taite is instant. Taite is blamed. Taite is epilithic. Patti is liked. Patti is excused. Rennie is liked. Rennie is instant. Leann is blamed. Green things are excused. If something is diadromous then it is blamed. All excused things are diadromous. Patti is not blamed.", "logic": "\nLiked(taite)\nAgrarian(taite)\nInstant(taite)\nBlamed(taite)\nEpilithic(taite)\nLiked(patti)\nExcused(patti)\nLiked(rennie)\nInstant(rennie)\nBlamed(leann)\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Blamed(x))\nforall x (Excused(x) -> Diadromous(x))\n\nnot Blamed(patti)\n\nExcused(patti) and forall x (Excused(x) -> Diadromous(x)) -> therefore Diadromous(patti) Diadromous(patti) and forall x (Diadromous(x) -> Blamed(x)) -> therefore Blamed(patti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Irma is brumal. Irma is bondable. Irma is longhand. Irma is xciii. Irma is scrotal. Amos is brumal. Amos is estrous. Bonnie is brumal. Bonnie is longhand. Evangelin is xciii. Green things are estrous. If something is seamed then it is xciii. All estrous things are seamed. Bonnie is not estrous.", "logic": "\nBrumal(irma)\nBondable(irma)\nLonghand(irma)\nXciii(irma)\nScrotal(irma)\nBrumal(amos)\nEstrous(amos)\nBrumal(bonnie)\nLonghand(bonnie)\nXciii(evangelin)\nforall x (Seamed(x) -> Estrous(x))\nforall x (Seamed(x) -> Xciii(x))\nforall x (Estrous(x) -> Seamed(x))\n\nnot Estrous(bonnie)\n\nforall x (Seamed(x) -> Estrous(x)) <- forall x (Estrous(x) -> Seamed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Kriste is impatient. Kriste is negroid. Kriste is incurious. Kriste is seared. Kriste is chiasmic. Orel is impatient. Orel is headed. Leonerd is impatient. Leonerd is incurious. Denis is seared. Green things are headed. If something is dusty then it is seared. All headed things are dusty. Leonerd is dusty.", "logic": "\nImpatient(kriste)\nNegroid(kriste)\nIncurious(kriste)\nSeared(kriste)\nChiasmic(kriste)\nImpatient(orel)\nHeaded(orel)\nImpatient(leonerd)\nIncurious(leonerd)\nSeared(denis)\nforall x (Dusty(x) -> Headed(x))\nforall x (Dusty(x) -> Seared(x))\nforall x (Headed(x) -> Dusty(x))\n\nDusty(leonerd)\n\nforall x (Headed(x) -> Dusty(x)) <- forall x (Dusty(x) -> Headed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Tybalt is cognisant. Tybalt is taupe. Tybalt is glassed. Tybalt is irrational. Tybalt is inelegant. Valencia is cognisant. Valencia is northwest. Caspar is cognisant. Caspar is glassed. Shayla is irrational. Green things are northwest. If something is slumbery then it is irrational. All northwest things are slumbery. Shayla is not slumbery.", "logic": "\nCognisant(tybalt)\nTaupe(tybalt)\nGlassed(tybalt)\nIrrational(tybalt)\nInelegant(tybalt)\nCognisant(valencia)\nNorthwest(valencia)\nCognisant(caspar)\nGlassed(caspar)\nIrrational(shayla)\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Irrational(x))\nforall x (Northwest(x) -> Slumbery(x))\n\nnot Slumbery(shayla)\n\nforall x (Northwest(x) -> Slumbery(x)) <- forall x (Slumbery(x) -> Northwest(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Goose is gilbertian. Goose is credal. Goose is fossorial. Goose is miniscule. Goose is portentous. Abram is gilbertian. Abram is aphakic. Alvinia is gilbertian. Alvinia is fossorial. Terrie is miniscule. Green things are aphakic. If something is usurious then it is miniscule. All aphakic things are usurious. Terrie is fossorial.", "logic": "\nGilbertian(goose)\nCredal(goose)\nFossorial(goose)\nMiniscule(goose)\nPortentous(goose)\nGilbertian(abram)\nAphakic(abram)\nGilbertian(alvinia)\nFossorial(alvinia)\nMiniscule(terrie)\nforall x (Usurious(x) -> Aphakic(x))\nforall x (Usurious(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) -> Usurious(x))\n\nFossorial(terrie)\n\nFossorial(terrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Annabelle is typical. Annabelle is uncultured. Annabelle is mechanic. Annabelle is exuvial. Annabelle is unadapted. Jae is typical. Jae is oily. Gwenneth is typical. Gwenneth is mechanic. Karole is exuvial. Green things are oily. If something is defensive then it is exuvial. All oily things are defensive. Karole is not uncultured.", "logic": "\nTypical(annabelle)\nUncultured(annabelle)\nMechanic(annabelle)\nExuvial(annabelle)\nUnadapted(annabelle)\nTypical(jae)\nOily(jae)\nTypical(gwenneth)\nMechanic(gwenneth)\nExuvial(karole)\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Oily(x))\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Exuvial(x))\nforall x (Oily(x) -> Defensive(x))\n\nnot Uncultured(karole)\n\nnot Uncultured(karole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Stephie is burning. Stephie is gaseous. Stephie is forfeited. Stephie is perceptive. Stephie is arrayed. Raul is burning. Raul is maddening. Tod is burning. Tod is forfeited. Nettie is perceptive. Green things are maddening. If something is doomed then it is perceptive. All maddening things are doomed. Nettie is arrayed.", "logic": "\nBurning(stephie)\nGaseous(stephie)\nForfeited(stephie)\nPerceptive(stephie)\nArrayed(stephie)\nBurning(raul)\nMaddening(raul)\nBurning(tod)\nForfeited(tod)\nPerceptive(nettie)\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Maddening(x))\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Perceptive(x))\nforall x (Maddening(x) -> Doomed(x))\n\nArrayed(nettie)\n\nArrayed(nettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-279"} {"premises": "Sandye is tomboyish. Sandye is carbuncled. Sandye is exoteric. Sandye is proper. Sandye is ilxx. Sandye is bicentric. Sandye is unshelled. Samara is tomboyish. Samara is exoteric. Samara is proper. Samara is ilxx. Samara is bicentric. Nelli is carbuncled. Nelli is exoteric. Nelli is bicentric. Nelli is unshelled. Rough, unshelled people are tomboyish. If Samara is carbuncled and Samara is proper then Samara is bicentric. Furry, unshelled people are proper. All carbuncled, exoteric people are bicentric. All exoteric people are carbuncled. Kind people are bicentric. All proper, carbuncled people are bicentric. Red people are carbuncled. Nelli is unshelled.", "logic": "\nTomboyish(sandye)\nCarbuncled(sandye)\nExoteric(sandye)\nProper(sandye)\nIlxx(sandye)\nBicentric(sandye)\nUnshelled(sandye)\nTomboyish(samara)\nExoteric(samara)\nProper(samara)\nIlxx(samara)\nBicentric(samara)\nCarbuncled(nelli)\nExoteric(nelli)\nBicentric(nelli)\nUnshelled(nelli)\nforall x (Bicentric(x) and Unshelled(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\nCarbuncled(samara) and Proper(samara) -> Bicentric(samara)\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and Unshelled(x) -> Proper(x))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) and Exoteric(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Exoteric(x) -> Carbuncled(x))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Proper(x) and Carbuncled(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Ilxx(x) -> Carbuncled(x))\n\nUnshelled(nelli)\n\ntherefore Unshelled(nelli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Barney is stagy. Barney is comestible. Barney is reachable. Barney is untrusting. Barney is palpitant. Barney is stinting. Barney is leafed. Dorolisa is stagy. Dorolisa is reachable. Dorolisa is untrusting. Dorolisa is palpitant. Dorolisa is stinting. Andrew is comestible. Andrew is reachable. Andrew is stinting. Andrew is leafed. Rough, leafed people are stagy. If Dorolisa is comestible and Dorolisa is untrusting then Dorolisa is stinting. Furry, leafed people are untrusting. All comestible, reachable people are stinting. All reachable people are comestible. Kind people are stinting. All untrusting, comestible people are stinting. Red people are comestible. Barney is not untrusting.", "logic": "\nStagy(barney)\nComestible(barney)\nReachable(barney)\nUntrusting(barney)\nPalpitant(barney)\nStinting(barney)\nLeafed(barney)\nStagy(dorolisa)\nReachable(dorolisa)\nUntrusting(dorolisa)\nPalpitant(dorolisa)\nStinting(dorolisa)\nComestible(andrew)\nReachable(andrew)\nStinting(andrew)\nLeafed(andrew)\nforall x (Stinting(x) and Leafed(x) -> Stagy(x))\nComestible(dorolisa) and Untrusting(dorolisa) -> Stinting(dorolisa)\nforall x (Stagy(x) and Leafed(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) and Reachable(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) and Comestible(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Palpitant(x) -> Comestible(x))\n\nnot Untrusting(barney)\n\ntherefore Untrusting(barney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Jaquith is reflecting. Jaquith is flightless. Jaquith is wizardly. Jaquith is glial. Jaquith is dietetic. Jaquith is carpellary. Jaquith is crowded. Mercedes is reflecting. Mercedes is wizardly. Mercedes is glial. Mercedes is dietetic. Mercedes is carpellary. Jackelyn is flightless. Jackelyn is wizardly. Jackelyn is carpellary. Jackelyn is crowded. Rough, crowded people are reflecting. If Mercedes is flightless and Mercedes is glial then Mercedes is carpellary. Furry, crowded people are glial. All flightless, wizardly people are carpellary. All wizardly people are flightless. Kind people are carpellary. All glial, flightless people are carpellary. Red people are flightless. Mercedes is flightless.", "logic": "\nReflecting(jaquith)\nFlightless(jaquith)\nWizardly(jaquith)\nGlial(jaquith)\nDietetic(jaquith)\nCarpellary(jaquith)\nCrowded(jaquith)\nReflecting(mercedes)\nWizardly(mercedes)\nGlial(mercedes)\nDietetic(mercedes)\nCarpellary(mercedes)\nFlightless(jackelyn)\nWizardly(jackelyn)\nCarpellary(jackelyn)\nCrowded(jackelyn)\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and Crowded(x) -> Reflecting(x))\nFlightless(mercedes) and Glial(mercedes) -> Carpellary(mercedes)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Crowded(x) -> Glial(x))\nforall x (Flightless(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Carpellary(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Flightless(x))\nforall x (Flightless(x) -> Carpellary(x))\nforall x (Glial(x) and Flightless(x) -> Carpellary(x))\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Flightless(x))\n\nFlightless(mercedes)\n\nDietetic(mercedes) and forall x (Dietetic(x) -> Flightless(x)) -> therefore Flightless(mercedes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Dotti is ironic. Dotti is collect. Dotti is earthly. Dotti is neutered. Dotti is coarsened. Dotti is unexplored. Dotti is stateless. Uli is ironic. Uli is earthly. Uli is neutered. Uli is coarsened. Uli is unexplored. Amelita is collect. Amelita is earthly. Amelita is unexplored. Amelita is stateless. Rough, stateless people are ironic. If Uli is collect and Uli is neutered then Uli is unexplored. Furry, stateless people are neutered. All collect, earthly people are unexplored. All earthly people are collect. Kind people are unexplored. All neutered, collect people are unexplored. Red people are collect. Amelita is not ironic.", "logic": "\nIronic(dotti)\nCollect(dotti)\nEarthly(dotti)\nNeutered(dotti)\nCoarsened(dotti)\nUnexplored(dotti)\nStateless(dotti)\nIronic(uli)\nEarthly(uli)\nNeutered(uli)\nCoarsened(uli)\nUnexplored(uli)\nCollect(amelita)\nEarthly(amelita)\nUnexplored(amelita)\nStateless(amelita)\nforall x (Unexplored(x) and Stateless(x) -> Ironic(x))\nCollect(uli) and Neutered(uli) -> Unexplored(uli)\nforall x (Ironic(x) and Stateless(x) -> Neutered(x))\nforall x (Collect(x) and Earthly(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Collect(x))\nforall x (Collect(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Neutered(x) and Collect(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Coarsened(x) -> Collect(x))\n\nnot Ironic(amelita)\n\nUnexplored(amelita) and Stateless(amelita) and forall x (Unexplored(x) and Stateless(x) -> Ironic(x)) -> therefore Ironic(amelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Ulises is saxicolous. Ulises is nutlike. Ulises is despotic. Ulises is auriculate. Ulises is warm. Ulises is behavioral. Ulises is lively. Hillel is saxicolous. Hillel is despotic. Hillel is auriculate. Hillel is warm. Hillel is behavioral. Barty is nutlike. Barty is despotic. Barty is behavioral. Barty is lively. Rough, lively people are saxicolous. If Hillel is nutlike and Hillel is auriculate then Hillel is behavioral. Furry, lively people are auriculate. All nutlike, despotic people are behavioral. All despotic people are nutlike. Kind people are behavioral. All auriculate, nutlike people are behavioral. Red people are nutlike. Barty is auriculate.", "logic": "\nSaxicolous(ulises)\nNutlike(ulises)\nDespotic(ulises)\nAuriculate(ulises)\nWarm(ulises)\nBehavioral(ulises)\nLively(ulises)\nSaxicolous(hillel)\nDespotic(hillel)\nAuriculate(hillel)\nWarm(hillel)\nBehavioral(hillel)\nNutlike(barty)\nDespotic(barty)\nBehavioral(barty)\nLively(barty)\nforall x (Behavioral(x) and Lively(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nNutlike(hillel) and Auriculate(hillel) -> Behavioral(hillel)\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Lively(x) -> Auriculate(x))\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Despotic(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Despotic(x) -> Nutlike(x))\nforall x (Nutlike(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) and Nutlike(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Warm(x) -> Nutlike(x))\n\nAuriculate(barty)\n\nBehavioral(barty) and Lively(barty) and forall x (Behavioral(x) and Lively(x) -> Saxicolous(x)) -> therefore Saxicolous(barty) Saxicolous(barty) and Lively(barty) and forall x (Saxicolous(x) and Lively(x) -> Auriculate(x)) -> therefore Auriculate(barty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Willi is monistic. Willi is arborical. Willi is bistroic. Willi is breakable. Willi is bratty. Willi is quartan. Willi is fond. Sinclair is monistic. Sinclair is bistroic. Sinclair is breakable. Sinclair is bratty. Sinclair is quartan. Cherida is arborical. Cherida is bistroic. Cherida is quartan. Cherida is fond. Rough, fond people are monistic. If Sinclair is arborical and Sinclair is breakable then Sinclair is quartan. Furry, fond people are breakable. All arborical, bistroic people are quartan. All bistroic people are arborical. Kind people are quartan. All breakable, arborical people are quartan. Red people are arborical. Cherida is not breakable.", "logic": "\nMonistic(willi)\nArborical(willi)\nBistroic(willi)\nBreakable(willi)\nBratty(willi)\nQuartan(willi)\nFond(willi)\nMonistic(sinclair)\nBistroic(sinclair)\nBreakable(sinclair)\nBratty(sinclair)\nQuartan(sinclair)\nArborical(cherida)\nBistroic(cherida)\nQuartan(cherida)\nFond(cherida)\nforall x (Quartan(x) and Fond(x) -> Monistic(x))\nArborical(sinclair) and Breakable(sinclair) -> Quartan(sinclair)\nforall x (Monistic(x) and Fond(x) -> Breakable(x))\nforall x (Arborical(x) and Bistroic(x) -> Quartan(x))\nforall x (Bistroic(x) -> Arborical(x))\nforall x (Arborical(x) -> Quartan(x))\nforall x (Breakable(x) and Arborical(x) -> Quartan(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Arborical(x))\n\nnot Breakable(cherida)\n\nQuartan(cherida) and Fond(cherida) and forall x (Quartan(x) and Fond(x) -> Monistic(x)) -> therefore Monistic(cherida) Monistic(cherida) and Fond(cherida) and forall x (Monistic(x) and Fond(x) -> Breakable(x)) -> therefore Breakable(cherida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Rolland is stylish. Rolland is unplayable. Rolland is blowy. Rolland is sign. Rolland is diurnal. Rolland is warming. Rolland is supplicant. Prescott is stylish. Prescott is blowy. Prescott is sign. Prescott is diurnal. Prescott is warming. Lauraine is unplayable. Lauraine is blowy. Lauraine is warming. Lauraine is supplicant. Rough, supplicant people are stylish. If Prescott is unplayable and Prescott is sign then Prescott is warming. Furry, supplicant people are sign. All unplayable, blowy people are warming. All blowy people are unplayable. Kind people are warming. All sign, unplayable people are warming. Red people are unplayable. Prescott is not supplicant.", "logic": "\nStylish(rolland)\nUnplayable(rolland)\nBlowy(rolland)\nSign(rolland)\nDiurnal(rolland)\nWarming(rolland)\nSupplicant(rolland)\nStylish(prescott)\nBlowy(prescott)\nSign(prescott)\nDiurnal(prescott)\nWarming(prescott)\nUnplayable(lauraine)\nBlowy(lauraine)\nWarming(lauraine)\nSupplicant(lauraine)\nforall x (Warming(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Stylish(x))\nUnplayable(prescott) and Sign(prescott) -> Warming(prescott)\nforall x (Stylish(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Sign(x))\nforall x (Unplayable(x) and Blowy(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Blowy(x) -> Unplayable(x))\nforall x (Unplayable(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Sign(x) and Unplayable(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Diurnal(x) -> Unplayable(x))\n\nnot Supplicant(prescott)\n\nnot Supplicant(prescott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Philippa is cautious. Philippa is modern. Philippa is evident. Philippa is untested. Philippa is victorian. Philippa is biaural. Philippa is jungian. Malkah is cautious. Malkah is evident. Malkah is untested. Malkah is victorian. Malkah is biaural. Shirlee is modern. Shirlee is evident. Shirlee is biaural. Shirlee is jungian. Rough, jungian people are cautious. If Malkah is modern and Malkah is untested then Malkah is biaural. Furry, jungian people are untested. All modern, evident people are biaural. All evident people are modern. Kind people are biaural. All untested, modern people are biaural. Red people are modern. Shirlee is victorian.", "logic": "\nCautious(philippa)\nModern(philippa)\nEvident(philippa)\nUntested(philippa)\nVictorian(philippa)\nBiaural(philippa)\nJungian(philippa)\nCautious(malkah)\nEvident(malkah)\nUntested(malkah)\nVictorian(malkah)\nBiaural(malkah)\nModern(shirlee)\nEvident(shirlee)\nBiaural(shirlee)\nJungian(shirlee)\nforall x (Biaural(x) and Jungian(x) -> Cautious(x))\nModern(malkah) and Untested(malkah) -> Biaural(malkah)\nforall x (Cautious(x) and Jungian(x) -> Untested(x))\nforall x (Modern(x) and Evident(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (Evident(x) -> Modern(x))\nforall x (Modern(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (Untested(x) and Modern(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (Victorian(x) -> Modern(x))\n\nVictorian(shirlee)\n\nVictorian(shirlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2076"} {"premises": "Elna is malefic. Elna is not oily. Elna is living. Elna is cheap. Denise is poky. Denise is oily. Denise is pebbly. Jakob is malefic. Jakob is living. Jakob is not undynamic. If someone is malefic and oily then they are pebbly. If Denise is oily then Denise is pebbly. Rough, cheap people are undynamic. If someone is poky and not malefic then they are living. If someone is cheap and not pebbly then they are not poky. If someone is undynamic then they are poky. If someone is pebbly and not oily then they are cheap. Furry people are cheap. Elna is malefic.", "logic": "\nMalefic(elna)\nnot Oily(elna)\nLiving(elna)\nCheap(elna)\nPoky(denise)\nOily(denise)\nPebbly(denise)\nMalefic(jakob)\nLiving(jakob)\nnot Undynamic(jakob)\nforall x (Malefic(x) and Oily(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nOily(denise) -> Pebbly(denise)\nforall x (Pebbly(x) and Cheap(x) -> Undynamic(x))\nforall x (Poky(x) and not Malefic(x) -> Living(x))\nforall x (Cheap(x) and not Pebbly(x) -> not Poky(x))\nforall x (Undynamic(x) -> Poky(x))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) and not Oily(x) -> Cheap(x))\nforall x (Poky(x) -> Cheap(x))\n\nMalefic(elna)\n\ntherefore Malefic(elna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Tiffy is chondritic. Tiffy is not roguish. Tiffy is boolean. Tiffy is loved. Evvie is agonizing. Evvie is roguish. Evvie is answering. Amalee is chondritic. Amalee is boolean. Amalee is not siouan. If someone is chondritic and roguish then they are answering. If Evvie is roguish then Evvie is answering. Rough, loved people are siouan. If someone is agonizing and not chondritic then they are boolean. If someone is loved and not answering then they are not agonizing. If someone is siouan then they are agonizing. If someone is answering and not roguish then they are loved. Furry people are loved. Tiffy is not chondritic.", "logic": "\nChondritic(tiffy)\nnot Roguish(tiffy)\nBoolean(tiffy)\nLoved(tiffy)\nAgonizing(evvie)\nRoguish(evvie)\nAnswering(evvie)\nChondritic(amalee)\nBoolean(amalee)\nnot Siouan(amalee)\nforall x (Chondritic(x) and Roguish(x) -> Answering(x))\nRoguish(evvie) -> Answering(evvie)\nforall x (Answering(x) and Loved(x) -> Siouan(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) and not Chondritic(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Loved(x) and not Answering(x) -> not Agonizing(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Agonizing(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) and not Roguish(x) -> Loved(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) -> Loved(x))\n\nnot Chondritic(tiffy)\n\ntherefore Chondritic(tiffy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Sly is dormant. Sly is not pitiless. Sly is ineligible. Sly is anabiotic. Shelbi is irregular. Shelbi is pitiless. Shelbi is painful. Karissa is dormant. Karissa is ineligible. Karissa is not uncounted. If someone is dormant and pitiless then they are painful. If Shelbi is pitiless then Shelbi is painful. Rough, anabiotic people are uncounted. If someone is irregular and not dormant then they are ineligible. If someone is anabiotic and not painful then they are not irregular. If someone is uncounted then they are irregular. If someone is painful and not pitiless then they are anabiotic. Furry people are anabiotic. Shelbi is anabiotic.", "logic": "\nDormant(sly)\nnot Pitiless(sly)\nIneligible(sly)\nAnabiotic(sly)\nIrregular(shelbi)\nPitiless(shelbi)\nPainful(shelbi)\nDormant(karissa)\nIneligible(karissa)\nnot Uncounted(karissa)\nforall x (Dormant(x) and Pitiless(x) -> Painful(x))\nPitiless(shelbi) -> Painful(shelbi)\nforall x (Painful(x) and Anabiotic(x) -> Uncounted(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) and not Dormant(x) -> Ineligible(x))\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and not Painful(x) -> not Irregular(x))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Irregular(x))\nforall x (Painful(x) and not Pitiless(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\n\nAnabiotic(shelbi)\n\nIrregular(shelbi) and forall x (Irregular(x) -> Anabiotic(x)) -> therefore Anabiotic(shelbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Laure is resonating. Laure is not empirical. Laure is alate. Laure is unyielding. Sibylla is alkalotic. Sibylla is empirical. Sibylla is headfirst. Jolyn is resonating. Jolyn is alate. Jolyn is not satiric. If someone is resonating and empirical then they are headfirst. If Sibylla is empirical then Sibylla is headfirst. Rough, unyielding people are satiric. If someone is alkalotic and not resonating then they are alate. If someone is unyielding and not headfirst then they are not alkalotic. If someone is satiric then they are alkalotic. If someone is headfirst and not empirical then they are unyielding. Furry people are unyielding. Sibylla is not unyielding.", "logic": "\nResonating(laure)\nnot Empirical(laure)\nAlate(laure)\nUnyielding(laure)\nAlkalotic(sibylla)\nEmpirical(sibylla)\nHeadfirst(sibylla)\nResonating(jolyn)\nAlate(jolyn)\nnot Satiric(jolyn)\nforall x (Resonating(x) and Empirical(x) -> Headfirst(x))\nEmpirical(sibylla) -> Headfirst(sibylla)\nforall x (Headfirst(x) and Unyielding(x) -> Satiric(x))\nforall x (Alkalotic(x) and not Resonating(x) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Unyielding(x) and not Headfirst(x) -> not Alkalotic(x))\nforall x (Satiric(x) -> Alkalotic(x))\nforall x (Headfirst(x) and not Empirical(x) -> Unyielding(x))\nforall x (Alkalotic(x) -> Unyielding(x))\n\nnot Unyielding(sibylla)\n\nAlkalotic(sibylla) and forall x (Alkalotic(x) -> Unyielding(x)) -> therefore Unyielding(sibylla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Glorianna is rearing. Glorianna is not endocrinal. Glorianna is systolic. Glorianna is excused. Camel is past. Camel is endocrinal. Camel is insouciant. Othilie is rearing. Othilie is systolic. Othilie is not norse. If someone is rearing and endocrinal then they are insouciant. If Camel is endocrinal then Camel is insouciant. Rough, excused people are norse. If someone is past and not rearing then they are systolic. If someone is excused and not insouciant then they are not past. If someone is norse then they are past. If someone is insouciant and not endocrinal then they are excused. Furry people are excused. Camel is norse.", "logic": "\nRearing(glorianna)\nnot Endocrinal(glorianna)\nSystolic(glorianna)\nExcused(glorianna)\nPast(camel)\nEndocrinal(camel)\nInsouciant(camel)\nRearing(othilie)\nSystolic(othilie)\nnot Norse(othilie)\nforall x (Rearing(x) and Endocrinal(x) -> Insouciant(x))\nEndocrinal(camel) -> Insouciant(camel)\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and Excused(x) -> Norse(x))\nforall x (Past(x) and not Rearing(x) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Excused(x) and not Insouciant(x) -> not Past(x))\nforall x (Norse(x) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and not Endocrinal(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Past(x) -> Excused(x))\n\nNorse(camel)\n\nPast(camel) and forall x (Past(x) -> Excused(x)) -> therefore Excused(camel) Insouciant(camel) and Excused(camel) and forall x (Insouciant(x) and Excused(x) -> Norse(x)) -> therefore Norse(camel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Cosmo is surrounded. Cosmo is not altissimo. Cosmo is cultural. Cosmo is outcast. Beverie is fleshy. Beverie is altissimo. Beverie is caucasian. Shoshanna is surrounded. Shoshanna is cultural. Shoshanna is not heated. If someone is surrounded and altissimo then they are caucasian. If Beverie is altissimo then Beverie is caucasian. Rough, outcast people are heated. If someone is fleshy and not surrounded then they are cultural. If someone is outcast and not caucasian then they are not fleshy. If someone is heated then they are fleshy. If someone is caucasian and not altissimo then they are outcast. Furry people are outcast. Beverie is not heated.", "logic": "\nSurrounded(cosmo)\nnot Altissimo(cosmo)\nCultural(cosmo)\nOutcast(cosmo)\nFleshy(beverie)\nAltissimo(beverie)\nCaucasian(beverie)\nSurrounded(shoshanna)\nCultural(shoshanna)\nnot Heated(shoshanna)\nforall x (Surrounded(x) and Altissimo(x) -> Caucasian(x))\nAltissimo(beverie) -> Caucasian(beverie)\nforall x (Caucasian(x) and Outcast(x) -> Heated(x))\nforall x (Fleshy(x) and not Surrounded(x) -> Cultural(x))\nforall x (Outcast(x) and not Caucasian(x) -> not Fleshy(x))\nforall x (Heated(x) -> Fleshy(x))\nforall x (Caucasian(x) and not Altissimo(x) -> Outcast(x))\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Outcast(x))\n\nnot Heated(beverie)\n\nFleshy(beverie) and forall x (Fleshy(x) -> Outcast(x)) -> therefore Outcast(beverie) Caucasian(beverie) and Outcast(beverie) and forall x (Caucasian(x) and Outcast(x) -> Heated(x)) -> therefore Heated(beverie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Rozalin is storeyed. Rozalin is not autotelic. Rozalin is unbending. Rozalin is indicatory. Ciel is retrousse. Ciel is autotelic. Ciel is mystified. Daune is storeyed. Daune is unbending. Daune is not marshy. If someone is storeyed and autotelic then they are mystified. If Ciel is autotelic then Ciel is mystified. Rough, indicatory people are marshy. If someone is retrousse and not storeyed then they are unbending. If someone is indicatory and not mystified then they are not retrousse. If someone is marshy then they are retrousse. If someone is mystified and not autotelic then they are indicatory. Furry people are indicatory. Rozalin is not mystified.", "logic": "\nStoreyed(rozalin)\nnot Autotelic(rozalin)\nUnbending(rozalin)\nIndicatory(rozalin)\nRetrousse(ciel)\nAutotelic(ciel)\nMystified(ciel)\nStoreyed(daune)\nUnbending(daune)\nnot Marshy(daune)\nforall x (Storeyed(x) and Autotelic(x) -> Mystified(x))\nAutotelic(ciel) -> Mystified(ciel)\nforall x (Mystified(x) and Indicatory(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Retrousse(x) and not Storeyed(x) -> Unbending(x))\nforall x (Indicatory(x) and not Mystified(x) -> not Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Mystified(x) and not Autotelic(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Retrousse(x) -> Indicatory(x))\n\nnot Mystified(rozalin)\n\nforall x (Storeyed(x) and Autotelic(x) -> Mystified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Amandy is rebellious. Amandy is not emarginate. Amandy is prevalent. Amandy is mosaic. Quintin is refreshed. Quintin is emarginate. Quintin is adductive. Tanya is rebellious. Tanya is prevalent. Tanya is not dietetic. If someone is rebellious and emarginate then they are adductive. If Quintin is emarginate then Quintin is adductive. Rough, mosaic people are dietetic. If someone is refreshed and not rebellious then they are prevalent. If someone is mosaic and not adductive then they are not refreshed. If someone is dietetic then they are refreshed. If someone is adductive and not emarginate then they are mosaic. Furry people are mosaic. Tanya is refreshed.", "logic": "\nRebellious(amandy)\nnot Emarginate(amandy)\nPrevalent(amandy)\nMosaic(amandy)\nRefreshed(quintin)\nEmarginate(quintin)\nAdductive(quintin)\nRebellious(tanya)\nPrevalent(tanya)\nnot Dietetic(tanya)\nforall x (Rebellious(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Adductive(x))\nEmarginate(quintin) -> Adductive(quintin)\nforall x (Adductive(x) and Mosaic(x) -> Dietetic(x))\nforall x (Refreshed(x) and not Rebellious(x) -> Prevalent(x))\nforall x (Mosaic(x) and not Adductive(x) -> not Refreshed(x))\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Refreshed(x))\nforall x (Adductive(x) and not Emarginate(x) -> Mosaic(x))\nforall x (Refreshed(x) -> Mosaic(x))\n\nRefreshed(tanya)\n\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Refreshed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Brana is dimorphous. Brana is not sloughy. Brana is bistered. Brana is undeniable. Cicily is megalithic. Cicily is sloughy. Cicily is sibyllic. Chrystal is dimorphous. Chrystal is bistered. Chrystal is not unliterary. If someone is dimorphous and sloughy then they are sibyllic. If Cicily is sloughy then Cicily is sibyllic. Rough, undeniable people are unliterary. If someone is megalithic and not dimorphous then they are bistered. If someone is undeniable and not sibyllic then they are not megalithic. If someone is unliterary then they are megalithic. If someone is sibyllic and not sloughy then they are undeniable. Furry people are undeniable. Brana is not unliterary.", "logic": "\nDimorphous(brana)\nnot Sloughy(brana)\nBistered(brana)\nUndeniable(brana)\nMegalithic(cicily)\nSloughy(cicily)\nSibyllic(cicily)\nDimorphous(chrystal)\nBistered(chrystal)\nnot Unliterary(chrystal)\nforall x (Dimorphous(x) and Sloughy(x) -> Sibyllic(x))\nSloughy(cicily) -> Sibyllic(cicily)\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) and Undeniable(x) -> Unliterary(x))\nforall x (Megalithic(x) and not Dimorphous(x) -> Bistered(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) and not Sibyllic(x) -> not Megalithic(x))\nforall x (Unliterary(x) -> Megalithic(x))\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) and not Sloughy(x) -> Undeniable(x))\nforall x (Megalithic(x) -> Undeniable(x))\n\nnot Unliterary(brana)\n\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) and Undeniable(x) -> Unliterary(x)) <- forall x (Dimorphous(x) and Sloughy(x) -> Sibyllic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Myriam is dummy. Myriam is not mussy. Myriam is squealing. Myriam is mannerly. Rebeca is finable. Rebeca is mussy. Rebeca is auctorial. Colleen is dummy. Colleen is squealing. Colleen is not meagerly. If someone is dummy and mussy then they are auctorial. If Rebeca is mussy then Rebeca is auctorial. Rough, mannerly people are meagerly. If someone is finable and not dummy then they are squealing. If someone is mannerly and not auctorial then they are not finable. If someone is meagerly then they are finable. If someone is auctorial and not mussy then they are mannerly. Furry people are mannerly. Colleen is mussy.", "logic": "\nDummy(myriam)\nnot Mussy(myriam)\nSquealing(myriam)\nMannerly(myriam)\nFinable(rebeca)\nMussy(rebeca)\nAuctorial(rebeca)\nDummy(colleen)\nSquealing(colleen)\nnot Meagerly(colleen)\nforall x (Dummy(x) and Mussy(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nMussy(rebeca) -> Auctorial(rebeca)\nforall x (Auctorial(x) and Mannerly(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Finable(x) and not Dummy(x) -> Squealing(x))\nforall x (Mannerly(x) and not Auctorial(x) -> not Finable(x))\nforall x (Meagerly(x) -> Finable(x))\nforall x (Auctorial(x) and not Mussy(x) -> Mannerly(x))\nforall x (Finable(x) -> Mannerly(x))\n\nMussy(colleen)\n\nMussy(colleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-994"} {"premises": "Allyn is nugatory. Allyn is ruling. Allyn is meltable. Allyn is ashamed. Allyn is weird. Kayle is meltable. Melonie is ruling. Melonie is meltable. Melonie is accursed. Melonie is ashamed. Melonie is weird. Cristal is nugatory. Cristal is meltable. Cristal is accursed. Cristal is ashamed. Cristal is weird. If something is meltable and ruling then it is accursed. Kind things are patellar. Allyn is nugatory.", "logic": "\nNugatory(allyn)\nRuling(allyn)\nMeltable(allyn)\nAshamed(allyn)\nWeird(allyn)\nMeltable(kayle)\nRuling(melonie)\nMeltable(melonie)\nAccursed(melonie)\nAshamed(melonie)\nWeird(melonie)\nNugatory(cristal)\nMeltable(cristal)\nAccursed(cristal)\nAshamed(cristal)\nWeird(cristal)\nforall x (Meltable(x) and Ruling(x) -> Accursed(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Patellar(x))\n\nNugatory(allyn)\n\ntherefore Nugatory(allyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Layton is stative. Layton is corneal. Layton is skinny. Layton is faltering. Layton is lyonnaise. Bonny is skinny. Harriett is corneal. Harriett is skinny. Harriett is repayable. Harriett is faltering. Harriett is lyonnaise. Jeremiah is stative. Jeremiah is skinny. Jeremiah is repayable. Jeremiah is faltering. Jeremiah is lyonnaise. If something is skinny and corneal then it is repayable. Kind things are wheelless. Bonny is not skinny.", "logic": "\nStative(layton)\nCorneal(layton)\nSkinny(layton)\nFaltering(layton)\nLyonnaise(layton)\nSkinny(bonny)\nCorneal(harriett)\nSkinny(harriett)\nRepayable(harriett)\nFaltering(harriett)\nLyonnaise(harriett)\nStative(jeremiah)\nSkinny(jeremiah)\nRepayable(jeremiah)\nFaltering(jeremiah)\nLyonnaise(jeremiah)\nforall x (Skinny(x) and Corneal(x) -> Repayable(x))\nforall x (Repayable(x) -> Wheelless(x))\n\nnot Skinny(bonny)\n\ntherefore Skinny(bonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Cal is aided. Cal is tibetan. Cal is adaptative. Cal is contrived. Cal is foldaway. Babita is adaptative. Sindee is tibetan. Sindee is adaptative. Sindee is groundless. Sindee is contrived. Sindee is foldaway. Sherwood is aided. Sherwood is adaptative. Sherwood is groundless. Sherwood is contrived. Sherwood is foldaway. If something is adaptative and tibetan then it is groundless. Kind things are outermost. Cal is groundless.", "logic": "\nAided(cal)\nTibetan(cal)\nAdaptative(cal)\nContrived(cal)\nFoldaway(cal)\nAdaptative(babita)\nTibetan(sindee)\nAdaptative(sindee)\nGroundless(sindee)\nContrived(sindee)\nFoldaway(sindee)\nAided(sherwood)\nAdaptative(sherwood)\nGroundless(sherwood)\nContrived(sherwood)\nFoldaway(sherwood)\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and Tibetan(x) -> Groundless(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Outermost(x))\n\nGroundless(cal)\n\nAdaptative(cal) and Tibetan(cal) and forall x (Adaptative(x) and Tibetan(x) -> Groundless(x)) -> therefore Groundless(cal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Ealasaid is dopy. Ealasaid is especial. Ealasaid is coming. Ealasaid is exergonic. Ealasaid is pastoral. Katy is coming. Leighton is especial. Leighton is coming. Leighton is deckled. Leighton is exergonic. Leighton is pastoral. Benedikta is dopy. Benedikta is coming. Benedikta is deckled. Benedikta is exergonic. Benedikta is pastoral. If something is coming and especial then it is deckled. Kind things are beautiful. Benedikta is not beautiful.", "logic": "\nDopy(ealasaid)\nEspecial(ealasaid)\nComing(ealasaid)\nExergonic(ealasaid)\nPastoral(ealasaid)\nComing(katy)\nEspecial(leighton)\nComing(leighton)\nDeckled(leighton)\nExergonic(leighton)\nPastoral(leighton)\nDopy(benedikta)\nComing(benedikta)\nDeckled(benedikta)\nExergonic(benedikta)\nPastoral(benedikta)\nforall x (Coming(x) and Especial(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Beautiful(x))\n\nnot Beautiful(benedikta)\n\nDeckled(benedikta) and forall x (Deckled(x) -> Beautiful(x)) -> therefore Beautiful(benedikta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Aggie is indecisive. Aggie is actinoid. Aggie is incestuous. Aggie is emboldened. Aggie is fisheye. Christoph is incestuous. Babette is actinoid. Babette is incestuous. Babette is melodious. Babette is emboldened. Babette is fisheye. Darcy is indecisive. Darcy is incestuous. Darcy is melodious. Darcy is emboldened. Darcy is fisheye. If something is incestuous and actinoid then it is melodious. Kind things are moonlike. Aggie is moonlike.", "logic": "\nIndecisive(aggie)\nActinoid(aggie)\nIncestuous(aggie)\nEmboldened(aggie)\nFisheye(aggie)\nIncestuous(christoph)\nActinoid(babette)\nIncestuous(babette)\nMelodious(babette)\nEmboldened(babette)\nFisheye(babette)\nIndecisive(darcy)\nIncestuous(darcy)\nMelodious(darcy)\nEmboldened(darcy)\nFisheye(darcy)\nforall x (Incestuous(x) and Actinoid(x) -> Melodious(x))\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Moonlike(x))\n\nMoonlike(aggie)\n\nIncestuous(aggie) and Actinoid(aggie) and forall x (Incestuous(x) and Actinoid(x) -> Melodious(x)) -> therefore Melodious(aggie) Melodious(aggie) and forall x (Melodious(x) -> Moonlike(x)) -> therefore Moonlike(aggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Dolly is newsy. Dolly is soleless. Dolly is torturing. Dolly is dietary. Dolly is articular. Susy is torturing. Blanche is soleless. Blanche is torturing. Blanche is colonial. Blanche is dietary. Blanche is articular. Shawna is newsy. Shawna is torturing. Shawna is colonial. Shawna is dietary. Shawna is articular. If something is torturing and soleless then it is colonial. Kind things are federated. Dolly is not federated.", "logic": "\nNewsy(dolly)\nSoleless(dolly)\nTorturing(dolly)\nDietary(dolly)\nArticular(dolly)\nTorturing(susy)\nSoleless(blanche)\nTorturing(blanche)\nColonial(blanche)\nDietary(blanche)\nArticular(blanche)\nNewsy(shawna)\nTorturing(shawna)\nColonial(shawna)\nDietary(shawna)\nArticular(shawna)\nforall x (Torturing(x) and Soleless(x) -> Colonial(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Federated(x))\n\nnot Federated(dolly)\n\nTorturing(dolly) and Soleless(dolly) and forall x (Torturing(x) and Soleless(x) -> Colonial(x)) -> therefore Colonial(dolly) Colonial(dolly) and forall x (Colonial(x) -> Federated(x)) -> therefore Federated(dolly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Vikki is spineless. Vikki is smothering. Vikki is industrial. Vikki is sanitized. Vikki is unhealed. Auberta is industrial. Noemi is smothering. Noemi is industrial. Noemi is unforceful. Noemi is sanitized. Noemi is unhealed. Thad is spineless. Thad is industrial. Thad is unforceful. Thad is sanitized. Thad is unhealed. If something is industrial and smothering then it is unforceful. Kind things are unstated. Auberta is not unforceful.", "logic": "\nSpineless(vikki)\nSmothering(vikki)\nIndustrial(vikki)\nSanitized(vikki)\nUnhealed(vikki)\nIndustrial(auberta)\nSmothering(noemi)\nIndustrial(noemi)\nUnforceful(noemi)\nSanitized(noemi)\nUnhealed(noemi)\nSpineless(thad)\nIndustrial(thad)\nUnforceful(thad)\nSanitized(thad)\nUnhealed(thad)\nforall x (Industrial(x) and Smothering(x) -> Unforceful(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) -> Unstated(x))\n\nnot Unforceful(auberta)\n\nforall x (Industrial(x) and Smothering(x) -> Unforceful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Luigi is poorly. Luigi is leechlike. Luigi is tearful. Luigi is siouan. Luigi is bloodshot. Garwood is tearful. Jessalyn is leechlike. Jessalyn is tearful. Jessalyn is triangular. Jessalyn is siouan. Jessalyn is bloodshot. Gabey is poorly. Gabey is tearful. Gabey is triangular. Gabey is siouan. Gabey is bloodshot. If something is tearful and leechlike then it is triangular. Kind things are overshot. Garwood is overshot.", "logic": "\nPoorly(luigi)\nLeechlike(luigi)\nTearful(luigi)\nSiouan(luigi)\nBloodshot(luigi)\nTearful(garwood)\nLeechlike(jessalyn)\nTearful(jessalyn)\nTriangular(jessalyn)\nSiouan(jessalyn)\nBloodshot(jessalyn)\nPoorly(gabey)\nTearful(gabey)\nTriangular(gabey)\nSiouan(gabey)\nBloodshot(gabey)\nforall x (Tearful(x) and Leechlike(x) -> Triangular(x))\nforall x (Triangular(x) -> Overshot(x))\n\nOvershot(garwood)\n\nforall x (Triangular(x) -> Overshot(x)) <- forall x (Tearful(x) and Leechlike(x) -> Triangular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Ardra is imprudent. Ardra is monotonous. Ardra is carbonyl. Ardra is randy. Ardra is mirrored. Plato is carbonyl. Delphinia is monotonous. Delphinia is carbonyl. Delphinia is eleven. Delphinia is randy. Delphinia is mirrored. Cass is imprudent. Cass is carbonyl. Cass is eleven. Cass is randy. Cass is mirrored. If something is carbonyl and monotonous then it is eleven. Kind things are uterine. Plato is not randy.", "logic": "\nImprudent(ardra)\nMonotonous(ardra)\nCarbonyl(ardra)\nRandy(ardra)\nMirrored(ardra)\nCarbonyl(plato)\nMonotonous(delphinia)\nCarbonyl(delphinia)\nEleven(delphinia)\nRandy(delphinia)\nMirrored(delphinia)\nImprudent(cass)\nCarbonyl(cass)\nEleven(cass)\nRandy(cass)\nMirrored(cass)\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) and Monotonous(x) -> Eleven(x))\nforall x (Eleven(x) -> Uterine(x))\n\nnot Randy(plato)\n\nnot Randy(plato) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Kylie is poached. Kylie is composed. Kylie is semantic. Kylie is imploring. Kylie is uninsured. Ajai is semantic. Harlan is composed. Harlan is semantic. Harlan is wilted. Harlan is imploring. Harlan is uninsured. Raychel is poached. Raychel is semantic. Raychel is wilted. Raychel is imploring. Raychel is uninsured. If something is semantic and composed then it is wilted. Kind things are venose. Harlan is poached.", "logic": "\nPoached(kylie)\nComposed(kylie)\nSemantic(kylie)\nImploring(kylie)\nUninsured(kylie)\nSemantic(ajai)\nComposed(harlan)\nSemantic(harlan)\nWilted(harlan)\nImploring(harlan)\nUninsured(harlan)\nPoached(raychel)\nSemantic(raychel)\nWilted(raychel)\nImploring(raychel)\nUninsured(raychel)\nforall x (Semantic(x) and Composed(x) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Wilted(x) -> Venose(x))\n\nPoached(harlan)\n\nPoached(harlan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Graeme is nonopening. Graeme is friable. Graeme is minus. Graeme is diamantine. Graeme is fallow. Gwenny is minus. Tommy is friable. Tommy is minus. Tommy is lapidary. Tommy is diamantine. Tommy is fallow. Dodie is nonopening. Dodie is minus. Dodie is lapidary. Dodie is diamantine. Dodie is fallow. If something is minus and friable then it is lapidary. Kind things are acerose. Gwenny is not fallow.", "logic": "\nNonopening(graeme)\nFriable(graeme)\nMinus(graeme)\nDiamantine(graeme)\nFallow(graeme)\nMinus(gwenny)\nFriable(tommy)\nMinus(tommy)\nLapidary(tommy)\nDiamantine(tommy)\nFallow(tommy)\nNonopening(dodie)\nMinus(dodie)\nLapidary(dodie)\nDiamantine(dodie)\nFallow(dodie)\nforall x (Minus(x) and Friable(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Acerose(x))\n\nnot Fallow(gwenny)\n\nnot Fallow(gwenny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Malinda is eritrean. Malinda is vocalic. Malinda is untainted. Malinda is earthborn. Malinda is mocking. Leonie is untainted. Flo is vocalic. Flo is untainted. Flo is hidrotic. Flo is earthborn. Flo is mocking. Kalindi is eritrean. Kalindi is untainted. Kalindi is hidrotic. Kalindi is earthborn. Kalindi is mocking. If something is untainted and vocalic then it is hidrotic. Kind things are mercenary. Leonie is eritrean.", "logic": "\nEritrean(malinda)\nVocalic(malinda)\nUntainted(malinda)\nEarthborn(malinda)\nMocking(malinda)\nUntainted(leonie)\nVocalic(flo)\nUntainted(flo)\nHidrotic(flo)\nEarthborn(flo)\nMocking(flo)\nEritrean(kalindi)\nUntainted(kalindi)\nHidrotic(kalindi)\nEarthborn(kalindi)\nMocking(kalindi)\nforall x (Untainted(x) and Vocalic(x) -> Hidrotic(x))\nforall x (Hidrotic(x) -> Mercenary(x))\n\nEritrean(leonie)\n\nEritrean(leonie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-323"} {"premises": "Gideon is dyslectic. Gideon is repentant. Gideon is chic. Gideon is warped. Florance is matched. Florance is dyslectic. Florance is repentant. Roderick is double. Roderick is matched. Roderick is repentant. If someone is dyslectic then they are warped. If someone is repentant then they are bristled. Quiet, warped people are matched. Florance is dyslectic.", "logic": "\nDyslectic(gideon)\nRepentant(gideon)\nChic(gideon)\nWarped(gideon)\nMatched(florance)\nDyslectic(florance)\nRepentant(florance)\nDouble(roderick)\nMatched(roderick)\nRepentant(roderick)\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) -> Warped(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Bristled(x))\nforall x (Bristled(x) and Warped(x) -> Matched(x))\n\nDyslectic(florance)\n\ntherefore Dyslectic(florance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Dagmar is rabbinic. Dagmar is solar. Dagmar is digital. Dagmar is papistic. Winfield is corrupt. Winfield is rabbinic. Winfield is solar. Rhett is societal. Rhett is corrupt. Rhett is solar. If someone is rabbinic then they are papistic. If someone is solar then they are unsound. Quiet, papistic people are corrupt. Winfield is not solar.", "logic": "\nRabbinic(dagmar)\nSolar(dagmar)\nDigital(dagmar)\nPapistic(dagmar)\nCorrupt(winfield)\nRabbinic(winfield)\nSolar(winfield)\nSocietal(rhett)\nCorrupt(rhett)\nSolar(rhett)\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) -> Papistic(x))\nforall x (Solar(x) -> Unsound(x))\nforall x (Unsound(x) and Papistic(x) -> Corrupt(x))\n\nnot Solar(winfield)\n\ntherefore Solar(winfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Rebe is plausive. Rebe is licenced. Rebe is umbilicate. Rebe is outboard. Roxana is lissome. Roxana is plausive. Roxana is licenced. Salmon is cancelled. Salmon is lissome. Salmon is licenced. If someone is plausive then they are outboard. If someone is licenced then they are winy. Quiet, outboard people are lissome. Rebe is winy.", "logic": "\nPlausive(rebe)\nLicenced(rebe)\nUmbilicate(rebe)\nOutboard(rebe)\nLissome(roxana)\nPlausive(roxana)\nLicenced(roxana)\nCancelled(salmon)\nLissome(salmon)\nLicenced(salmon)\nforall x (Plausive(x) -> Outboard(x))\nforall x (Licenced(x) -> Winy(x))\nforall x (Winy(x) and Outboard(x) -> Lissome(x))\n\nWiny(rebe)\n\nLicenced(rebe) and forall x (Licenced(x) -> Winy(x)) -> therefore Winy(rebe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Lyndel is cogitative. Lyndel is criterial. Lyndel is blithesome. Lyndel is cloistral. Loren is epideictic. Loren is cogitative. Loren is criterial. Andrew is midway. Andrew is epideictic. Andrew is criterial. If someone is cogitative then they are cloistral. If someone is criterial then they are parted. Quiet, cloistral people are epideictic. Loren is not parted.", "logic": "\nCogitative(lyndel)\nCriterial(lyndel)\nBlithesome(lyndel)\nCloistral(lyndel)\nEpideictic(loren)\nCogitative(loren)\nCriterial(loren)\nMidway(andrew)\nEpideictic(andrew)\nCriterial(andrew)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) -> Cloistral(x))\nforall x (Criterial(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Parted(x) and Cloistral(x) -> Epideictic(x))\n\nnot Parted(loren)\n\nCriterial(loren) and forall x (Criterial(x) -> Parted(x)) -> therefore Parted(loren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Vivie is pareve. Vivie is lightsome. Vivie is trabeate. Vivie is luckless. Zerk is apish. Zerk is pareve. Zerk is lightsome. Bernard is buteonine. Bernard is apish. Bernard is lightsome. If someone is pareve then they are luckless. If someone is lightsome then they are dotted. Quiet, luckless people are apish. Vivie is apish.", "logic": "\nPareve(vivie)\nLightsome(vivie)\nTrabeate(vivie)\nLuckless(vivie)\nApish(zerk)\nPareve(zerk)\nLightsome(zerk)\nButeonine(bernard)\nApish(bernard)\nLightsome(bernard)\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) -> Dotted(x))\nforall x (Dotted(x) and Luckless(x) -> Apish(x))\n\nApish(vivie)\n\nLightsome(vivie) and forall x (Lightsome(x) -> Dotted(x)) -> therefore Dotted(vivie) Dotted(vivie) and Luckless(vivie) and forall x (Dotted(x) and Luckless(x) -> Apish(x)) -> therefore Apish(vivie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Joli is underbred. Joli is cenobitic. Joli is subfusc. Joli is statute. Jereme is ceramic. Jereme is underbred. Jereme is cenobitic. Ruthie is leftmost. Ruthie is ceramic. Ruthie is cenobitic. If someone is underbred then they are statute. If someone is cenobitic then they are immortal. Quiet, statute people are ceramic. Joli is not ceramic.", "logic": "\nUnderbred(joli)\nCenobitic(joli)\nSubfusc(joli)\nStatute(joli)\nCeramic(jereme)\nUnderbred(jereme)\nCenobitic(jereme)\nLeftmost(ruthie)\nCeramic(ruthie)\nCenobitic(ruthie)\nforall x (Underbred(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Immortal(x))\nforall x (Immortal(x) and Statute(x) -> Ceramic(x))\n\nnot Ceramic(joli)\n\nCenobitic(joli) and forall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Immortal(x)) -> therefore Immortal(joli) Immortal(joli) and Statute(joli) and forall x (Immortal(x) and Statute(x) -> Ceramic(x)) -> therefore Ceramic(joli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Dede is strong. Dede is shady. Dede is moneran. Dede is vaulting. Lorilee is hebdomadal. Lorilee is strong. Lorilee is shady. Sophi is rush. Sophi is hebdomadal. Sophi is shady. If someone is strong then they are vaulting. If someone is shady then they are parve. Quiet, vaulting people are hebdomadal. Sophi is not vaulting.", "logic": "\nStrong(dede)\nShady(dede)\nMoneran(dede)\nVaulting(dede)\nHebdomadal(lorilee)\nStrong(lorilee)\nShady(lorilee)\nRush(sophi)\nHebdomadal(sophi)\nShady(sophi)\nforall x (Strong(x) -> Vaulting(x))\nforall x (Shady(x) -> Parve(x))\nforall x (Parve(x) and Vaulting(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\n\nnot Vaulting(sophi)\n\nforall x (Strong(x) -> Vaulting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Ivor is dowered. Ivor is chicken. Ivor is genitive. Ivor is grassy. Pierson is frumpy. Pierson is dowered. Pierson is chicken. Norina is frisian. Norina is frumpy. Norina is chicken. If someone is dowered then they are grassy. If someone is chicken then they are pictured. Quiet, grassy people are frumpy. Pierson is frisian.", "logic": "\nDowered(ivor)\nChicken(ivor)\nGenitive(ivor)\nGrassy(ivor)\nFrumpy(pierson)\nDowered(pierson)\nChicken(pierson)\nFrisian(norina)\nFrumpy(norina)\nChicken(norina)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Grassy(x))\nforall x (Chicken(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Pictured(x) and Grassy(x) -> Frumpy(x))\n\nFrisian(pierson)\n\nFrisian(pierson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Marjy is forfeit. Marjy is mensal. Marjy is hysterical. Marjy is plumed. Titus is must. Titus is forfeit. Titus is mensal. Tremain is amalgamate. Tremain is must. Tremain is mensal. If someone is forfeit then they are plumed. If someone is mensal then they are pyemic. Quiet, plumed people are must. Tremain is not forfeit.", "logic": "\nForfeit(marjy)\nMensal(marjy)\nHysterical(marjy)\nPlumed(marjy)\nMust(titus)\nForfeit(titus)\nMensal(titus)\nAmalgamate(tremain)\nMust(tremain)\nMensal(tremain)\nforall x (Forfeit(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Mensal(x) -> Pyemic(x))\nforall x (Pyemic(x) and Plumed(x) -> Must(x))\n\nnot Forfeit(tremain)\n\nnot Forfeit(tremain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Brittney is brutish. Brittney is colonized. Brittney is steady. Brittney is quaternate. Geeta is swampy. Geeta is brutish. Geeta is colonized. Wade is talkative. Wade is swampy. Wade is colonized. If someone is brutish then they are quaternate. If someone is colonized then they are sultry. Quiet, quaternate people are swampy. Brittney is talkative.", "logic": "\nBrutish(brittney)\nColonized(brittney)\nSteady(brittney)\nQuaternate(brittney)\nSwampy(geeta)\nBrutish(geeta)\nColonized(geeta)\nTalkative(wade)\nSwampy(wade)\nColonized(wade)\nforall x (Brutish(x) -> Quaternate(x))\nforall x (Colonized(x) -> Sultry(x))\nforall x (Sultry(x) and Quaternate(x) -> Swampy(x))\n\nTalkative(brittney)\n\nTalkative(brittney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Britta is irritative. Britta is corrupted. Britta is fecal. Britta is coloured. Moises is reversed. Moises is irritative. Moises is corrupted. Melitta is nidifugous. Melitta is reversed. Melitta is corrupted. If someone is irritative then they are coloured. If someone is corrupted then they are lithesome. Quiet, coloured people are reversed. Melitta is not fecal.", "logic": "\nIrritative(britta)\nCorrupted(britta)\nFecal(britta)\nColoured(britta)\nReversed(moises)\nIrritative(moises)\nCorrupted(moises)\nNidifugous(melitta)\nReversed(melitta)\nCorrupted(melitta)\nforall x (Irritative(x) -> Coloured(x))\nforall x (Corrupted(x) -> Lithesome(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) and Coloured(x) -> Reversed(x))\n\nnot Fecal(melitta)\n\nnot Fecal(melitta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Carlie is brinded. Carlie is chromatic. Carlie is still. Carlie is pentatonic. Morton is deadened. Morton is brinded. Morton is chromatic. Brigid is eldest. Brigid is deadened. Brigid is chromatic. If someone is brinded then they are pentatonic. If someone is chromatic then they are brimfull. Quiet, pentatonic people are deadened. Morton is still.", "logic": "\nBrinded(carlie)\nChromatic(carlie)\nStill(carlie)\nPentatonic(carlie)\nDeadened(morton)\nBrinded(morton)\nChromatic(morton)\nEldest(brigid)\nDeadened(brigid)\nChromatic(brigid)\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Brimfull(x))\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Pentatonic(x) -> Deadened(x))\n\nStill(morton)\n\nStill(morton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "The saxon ache the orelle. The saxon is australian. The saxon is floored. The saxon is subscript. The saxon is unwounded. The saxon is homophonic. The saxon wither the orelle. The saxon neigh the orelle. The orelle ache the saxon. The orelle is australian. The orelle is floored. The orelle is subscript. The orelle is unwounded. The orelle is homophonic. The orelle wither the saxon. The orelle neigh the saxon. If something is australian and it ache the orelle then the orelle ache the saxon. If something wither the saxon and it ache the saxon then it is subscript. If something neigh the orelle then it ache the orelle. If something is subscript then it neigh the orelle. If the saxon is subscript then the saxon ache the orelle. If something neigh the orelle then the orelle ache the saxon. The saxon is subscript.", "logic": "\nAche(saxon, orelle)\nAustralian(saxon)\nFloored(saxon)\nSubscript(saxon)\nUnwounded(saxon)\nHomophonic(saxon)\nWither(saxon, orelle)\nNeigh(saxon, orelle)\nAche(orelle, saxon)\nAustralian(orelle)\nFloored(orelle)\nSubscript(orelle)\nUnwounded(orelle)\nHomophonic(orelle)\nWither(orelle, saxon)\nNeigh(orelle, saxon)\nforall x (Australian(x) and Ache(x, orelle) -> Ache(orelle, saxon))\nforall x (Wither(x, saxon) and Ache(x, saxon) -> Subscript(x))\nforall x (Neigh(x, orelle) -> Ache(x, orelle))\nforall x (Subscript(x) -> Neigh(x, orelle))\nSubscript(saxon) -> Ache(saxon, orelle)\nforall x (Neigh(x, orelle) -> Ache(orelle, saxon))\n\nSubscript(saxon)\n\ntherefore Subscript(saxon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The nanette induce the austine. The nanette is sodden. The nanette is jocular. The nanette is elongated. The nanette is riled. The nanette is sandlike. The nanette disco the austine. The nanette mapquest the austine. The austine induce the nanette. The austine is sodden. The austine is jocular. The austine is elongated. The austine is riled. The austine is sandlike. The austine disco the nanette. The austine mapquest the nanette. If something is sodden and it induce the austine then the austine induce the nanette. If something disco the nanette and it induce the nanette then it is elongated. If something mapquest the austine then it induce the austine. If something is elongated then it mapquest the austine. If the nanette is elongated then the nanette induce the austine. If something mapquest the austine then the austine induce the nanette. The austine is not sodden.", "logic": "\nInduce(nanette, austine)\nSodden(nanette)\nJocular(nanette)\nElongated(nanette)\nRiled(nanette)\nSandlike(nanette)\nDisco(nanette, austine)\nMapquest(nanette, austine)\nInduce(austine, nanette)\nSodden(austine)\nJocular(austine)\nElongated(austine)\nRiled(austine)\nSandlike(austine)\nDisco(austine, nanette)\nMapquest(austine, nanette)\nforall x (Sodden(x) and Induce(x, austine) -> Induce(austine, nanette))\nforall x (Disco(x, nanette) and Induce(x, nanette) -> Elongated(x))\nforall x (Mapquest(x, austine) -> Induce(x, austine))\nforall x (Elongated(x) -> Mapquest(x, austine))\nElongated(nanette) -> Induce(nanette, austine)\nforall x (Mapquest(x, austine) -> Induce(austine, nanette))\n\nnot Sodden(austine)\n\ntherefore Sodden(austine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The rhett burden the almira. The rhett is weatherly. The rhett is inexpert. The rhett is peaceful. The rhett is diabatic. The rhett is nonuple. The rhett preisolate the almira. The rhett sexualize the almira. The almira burden the rhett. The almira is weatherly. The almira is inexpert. The almira is peaceful. The almira is diabatic. The almira is nonuple. The almira preisolate the rhett. The almira sexualize the rhett. If something is weatherly and it burden the almira then the almira burden the rhett. If something preisolate the rhett and it burden the rhett then it is peaceful. If something sexualize the almira then it burden the almira. If something is peaceful then it sexualize the almira. If the rhett is peaceful then the rhett burden the almira. If something sexualize the almira then the almira burden the rhett. The almira sexualize the almira.", "logic": "\nBurden(rhett, almira)\nWeatherly(rhett)\nInexpert(rhett)\nPeaceful(rhett)\nDiabatic(rhett)\nNonuple(rhett)\nPreisolate(rhett, almira)\nSexualize(rhett, almira)\nBurden(almira, rhett)\nWeatherly(almira)\nInexpert(almira)\nPeaceful(almira)\nDiabatic(almira)\nNonuple(almira)\nPreisolate(almira, rhett)\nSexualize(almira, rhett)\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Burden(x, almira) -> Burden(almira, rhett))\nforall x (Preisolate(x, rhett) and Burden(x, rhett) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, almira) -> Burden(x, almira))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Sexualize(x, almira))\nPeaceful(rhett) -> Burden(rhett, almira)\nforall x (Sexualize(x, almira) -> Burden(almira, rhett))\n\nSexualize(almira, almira)\n\nPeaceful(almira) and forall x (Peaceful(x) -> Sexualize(x, almira)) -> therefore Sexualize(almira, almira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The garnet muzzle the dorella. The garnet is edited. The garnet is civic. The garnet is dependent. The garnet is qualified. The garnet is eonian. The garnet consult the dorella. The garnet caucus the dorella. The dorella muzzle the garnet. The dorella is edited. The dorella is civic. The dorella is dependent. The dorella is qualified. The dorella is eonian. The dorella consult the garnet. The dorella caucus the garnet. If something is edited and it muzzle the dorella then the dorella muzzle the garnet. If something consult the garnet and it muzzle the garnet then it is dependent. If something caucus the dorella then it muzzle the dorella. If something is dependent then it caucus the dorella. If the garnet is dependent then the garnet muzzle the dorella. If something caucus the dorella then the dorella muzzle the garnet. The dorella does not see the dorella.", "logic": "\nMuzzle(garnet, dorella)\nEdited(garnet)\nCivic(garnet)\nDependent(garnet)\nQualified(garnet)\nEonian(garnet)\nConsult(garnet, dorella)\nCaucus(garnet, dorella)\nMuzzle(dorella, garnet)\nEdited(dorella)\nCivic(dorella)\nDependent(dorella)\nQualified(dorella)\nEonian(dorella)\nConsult(dorella, garnet)\nCaucus(dorella, garnet)\nforall x (Edited(x) and Muzzle(x, dorella) -> Muzzle(dorella, garnet))\nforall x (Consult(x, garnet) and Muzzle(x, garnet) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Caucus(x, dorella) -> Muzzle(x, dorella))\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Caucus(x, dorella))\nDependent(garnet) -> Muzzle(garnet, dorella)\nforall x (Caucus(x, dorella) -> Muzzle(dorella, garnet))\n\nnot Caucus(dorella, dorella)\n\nDependent(dorella) and forall x (Dependent(x) -> Caucus(x, dorella)) -> therefore Caucus(dorella, dorella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The torrie back the erek. The torrie is scornful. The torrie is dabbled. The torrie is indicatory. The torrie is phocine. The torrie is prototypic. The torrie lunge the erek. The torrie toughen the erek. The erek back the torrie. The erek is scornful. The erek is dabbled. The erek is indicatory. The erek is phocine. The erek is prototypic. The erek lunge the torrie. The erek toughen the torrie. If something is scornful and it back the erek then the erek back the torrie. If something lunge the torrie and it back the torrie then it is indicatory. If something toughen the erek then it back the erek. If something is indicatory then it toughen the erek. If the torrie is indicatory then the torrie back the erek. If something toughen the erek then the erek back the torrie. The erek back the erek.", "logic": "\nBack(torrie, erek)\nScornful(torrie)\nDabbled(torrie)\nIndicatory(torrie)\nPhocine(torrie)\nPrototypic(torrie)\nLunge(torrie, erek)\nToughen(torrie, erek)\nBack(erek, torrie)\nScornful(erek)\nDabbled(erek)\nIndicatory(erek)\nPhocine(erek)\nPrototypic(erek)\nLunge(erek, torrie)\nToughen(erek, torrie)\nforall x (Scornful(x) and Back(x, erek) -> Back(erek, torrie))\nforall x (Lunge(x, torrie) and Back(x, torrie) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Toughen(x, erek) -> Back(x, erek))\nforall x (Indicatory(x) -> Toughen(x, erek))\nIndicatory(torrie) -> Back(torrie, erek)\nforall x (Toughen(x, erek) -> Back(erek, torrie))\n\nBack(erek, erek)\n\nIndicatory(erek) and forall x (Indicatory(x) -> Toughen(x, erek)) -> therefore Toughen(erek, erek) Toughen(erek, erek) and forall x (Toughen(x, erek) -> Back(x, erek)) -> therefore Back(erek, erek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The roderick field the ranique. The roderick is multiple. The roderick is acerose. The roderick is trim. The roderick is struggling. The roderick is bayesian. The roderick brain the ranique. The roderick scrimp the ranique. The ranique field the roderick. The ranique is multiple. The ranique is acerose. The ranique is trim. The ranique is struggling. The ranique is bayesian. The ranique brain the roderick. The ranique scrimp the roderick. If something is multiple and it field the ranique then the ranique field the roderick. If something brain the roderick and it field the roderick then it is trim. If something scrimp the ranique then it field the ranique. If something is trim then it scrimp the ranique. If the roderick is trim then the roderick field the ranique. If something scrimp the ranique then the ranique field the roderick. The ranique does not chase the ranique.", "logic": "\nField(roderick, ranique)\nMultiple(roderick)\nAcerose(roderick)\nTrim(roderick)\nStruggling(roderick)\nBayesian(roderick)\nBrain(roderick, ranique)\nScrimp(roderick, ranique)\nField(ranique, roderick)\nMultiple(ranique)\nAcerose(ranique)\nTrim(ranique)\nStruggling(ranique)\nBayesian(ranique)\nBrain(ranique, roderick)\nScrimp(ranique, roderick)\nforall x (Multiple(x) and Field(x, ranique) -> Field(ranique, roderick))\nforall x (Brain(x, roderick) and Field(x, roderick) -> Trim(x))\nforall x (Scrimp(x, ranique) -> Field(x, ranique))\nforall x (Trim(x) -> Scrimp(x, ranique))\nTrim(roderick) -> Field(roderick, ranique)\nforall x (Scrimp(x, ranique) -> Field(ranique, roderick))\n\nnot Field(ranique, ranique)\n\nTrim(ranique) and forall x (Trim(x) -> Scrimp(x, ranique)) -> therefore Scrimp(ranique, ranique) Scrimp(ranique, ranique) and forall x (Scrimp(x, ranique) -> Field(x, ranique)) -> therefore Field(ranique, ranique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The brenda endorse the stephenie. The brenda is mandean. The brenda is popish. The brenda is haitian. The brenda is bulblike. The brenda is propertied. The brenda schematise the stephenie. The brenda wish the stephenie. The stephenie endorse the brenda. The stephenie is mandean. The stephenie is popish. The stephenie is haitian. The stephenie is bulblike. The stephenie is propertied. The stephenie schematise the brenda. The stephenie wish the brenda. If something is mandean and it endorse the stephenie then the stephenie endorse the brenda. If something schematise the brenda and it endorse the brenda then it is haitian. If something wish the stephenie then it endorse the stephenie. If something is haitian then it wish the stephenie. If the brenda is haitian then the brenda endorse the stephenie. If something wish the stephenie then the stephenie endorse the brenda. The brenda does not see the brenda.", "logic": "\nEndorse(brenda, stephenie)\nMandean(brenda)\nPopish(brenda)\nHaitian(brenda)\nBulblike(brenda)\nPropertied(brenda)\nSchematise(brenda, stephenie)\nWish(brenda, stephenie)\nEndorse(stephenie, brenda)\nMandean(stephenie)\nPopish(stephenie)\nHaitian(stephenie)\nBulblike(stephenie)\nPropertied(stephenie)\nSchematise(stephenie, brenda)\nWish(stephenie, brenda)\nforall x (Mandean(x) and Endorse(x, stephenie) -> Endorse(stephenie, brenda))\nforall x (Schematise(x, brenda) and Endorse(x, brenda) -> Haitian(x))\nforall x (Wish(x, stephenie) -> Endorse(x, stephenie))\nforall x (Haitian(x) -> Wish(x, stephenie))\nHaitian(brenda) -> Endorse(brenda, stephenie)\nforall x (Wish(x, stephenie) -> Endorse(stephenie, brenda))\n\nnot Wish(brenda, brenda)\n\nnot Wish(brenda, brenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The breena deaminize the carlton. The breena is purulent. The breena is burmese. The breena is barbecued. The breena is attempted. The breena is needlelike. The breena reward the carlton. The breena abrase the carlton. The carlton deaminize the breena. The carlton is purulent. The carlton is burmese. The carlton is barbecued. The carlton is attempted. The carlton is needlelike. The carlton reward the breena. The carlton abrase the breena. If something is purulent and it deaminize the carlton then the carlton deaminize the breena. If something reward the breena and it deaminize the breena then it is barbecued. If something abrase the carlton then it deaminize the carlton. If something is barbecued then it abrase the carlton. If the breena is barbecued then the breena deaminize the carlton. If something abrase the carlton then the carlton deaminize the breena. The carlton reward the carlton.", "logic": "\nDeaminize(breena, carlton)\nPurulent(breena)\nBurmese(breena)\nBarbecued(breena)\nAttempted(breena)\nNeedlelike(breena)\nReward(breena, carlton)\nAbrase(breena, carlton)\nDeaminize(carlton, breena)\nPurulent(carlton)\nBurmese(carlton)\nBarbecued(carlton)\nAttempted(carlton)\nNeedlelike(carlton)\nReward(carlton, breena)\nAbrase(carlton, breena)\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Deaminize(x, carlton) -> Deaminize(carlton, breena))\nforall x (Reward(x, breena) and Deaminize(x, breena) -> Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Abrase(x, carlton) -> Deaminize(x, carlton))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) -> Abrase(x, carlton))\nBarbecued(breena) -> Deaminize(breena, carlton)\nforall x (Abrase(x, carlton) -> Deaminize(carlton, breena))\n\nReward(carlton, carlton)\n\nReward(carlton, carlton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The mohamed balk the archon. The mohamed is caramel. The mohamed is comal. The mohamed is spinnable. The mohamed is emollient. The mohamed is salvadoran. The mohamed sample the archon. The mohamed disband the archon. The archon balk the mohamed. The archon is caramel. The archon is comal. The archon is spinnable. The archon is emollient. The archon is salvadoran. The archon sample the mohamed. The archon disband the mohamed. If something is caramel and it balk the archon then the archon balk the mohamed. If something sample the mohamed and it balk the mohamed then it is spinnable. If something disband the archon then it balk the archon. If something is spinnable then it disband the archon. If the mohamed is spinnable then the mohamed balk the archon. If something disband the archon then the archon balk the mohamed. The mohamed does not like the mohamed.", "logic": "\nBalk(mohamed, archon)\nCaramel(mohamed)\nComal(mohamed)\nSpinnable(mohamed)\nEmollient(mohamed)\nSalvadoran(mohamed)\nSample(mohamed, archon)\nDisband(mohamed, archon)\nBalk(archon, mohamed)\nCaramel(archon)\nComal(archon)\nSpinnable(archon)\nEmollient(archon)\nSalvadoran(archon)\nSample(archon, mohamed)\nDisband(archon, mohamed)\nforall x (Caramel(x) and Balk(x, archon) -> Balk(archon, mohamed))\nforall x (Sample(x, mohamed) and Balk(x, mohamed) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Disband(x, archon) -> Balk(x, archon))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> Disband(x, archon))\nSpinnable(mohamed) -> Balk(mohamed, archon)\nforall x (Disband(x, archon) -> Balk(archon, mohamed))\n\nnot Sample(mohamed, mohamed)\n\nnot Sample(mohamed, mohamed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The baron outgeneral the vida. The baron is blastular. The baron is tawdry. The baron is oracular. The baron is palmy. The baron is rupestral. The baron paginate the vida. The baron rediscover the vida. The vida outgeneral the baron. The vida is blastular. The vida is tawdry. The vida is oracular. The vida is palmy. The vida is rupestral. The vida paginate the baron. The vida rediscover the baron. If something is blastular and it outgeneral the vida then the vida outgeneral the baron. If something paginate the baron and it outgeneral the baron then it is oracular. If something rediscover the vida then it outgeneral the vida. If something is oracular then it rediscover the vida. If the baron is oracular then the baron outgeneral the vida. If something rediscover the vida then the vida outgeneral the baron. The baron outgeneral the baron.", "logic": "\nOutgeneral(baron, vida)\nBlastular(baron)\nTawdry(baron)\nOracular(baron)\nPalmy(baron)\nRupestral(baron)\nPaginate(baron, vida)\nRediscover(baron, vida)\nOutgeneral(vida, baron)\nBlastular(vida)\nTawdry(vida)\nOracular(vida)\nPalmy(vida)\nRupestral(vida)\nPaginate(vida, baron)\nRediscover(vida, baron)\nforall x (Blastular(x) and Outgeneral(x, vida) -> Outgeneral(vida, baron))\nforall x (Paginate(x, baron) and Outgeneral(x, baron) -> Oracular(x))\nforall x (Rediscover(x, vida) -> Outgeneral(x, vida))\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Rediscover(x, vida))\nOracular(baron) -> Outgeneral(baron, vida)\nforall x (Rediscover(x, vida) -> Outgeneral(vida, baron))\n\nOutgeneral(baron, baron)\n\nOutgeneral(baron, baron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The manda is worn. The manda gain the bryn. The manda disinfest the goldy. The goldy mire the bryn. The goldy is azygous. The goldy is skilful. The goldy does not like the manda. The goldy does not like the bryn. The goldy disinfest the manda. The bryn mire the goldy. The bryn disinfest the manda. The bryn disinfest the goldy. If something is skilful and it mire the bryn then it mire the manda. If something mire the manda then it is unbelted. The bryn disinfest the goldy.", "logic": "\nWorn(manda)\nGain(manda, bryn)\nDisinfest(manda, goldy)\nMire(goldy, bryn)\nAzygous(goldy)\nSkilful(goldy)\nnot Gain(goldy, manda)\nnot Gain(goldy, bryn)\nDisinfest(goldy, manda)\nMire(bryn, goldy)\nDisinfest(bryn, manda)\nDisinfest(bryn, goldy)\nforall x (Skilful(x) and Mire(x, bryn) -> Mire(x, manda))\nforall x (Mire(x, manda) -> Unbelted(x))\n\nDisinfest(bryn, goldy)\n\ntherefore Disinfest(bryn, goldy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The bethena is swordlike. The bethena cachinnate the opalina. The bethena embattle the elly. The elly withhold the opalina. The elly is wordy. The elly is unpassable. The elly does not like the bethena. The elly does not like the opalina. The elly embattle the bethena. The opalina withhold the elly. The opalina embattle the bethena. The opalina embattle the elly. If something is unpassable and it withhold the opalina then it withhold the bethena. If something withhold the bethena then it is curving. The bethena is not swordlike.", "logic": "\nSwordlike(bethena)\nCachinnate(bethena, opalina)\nEmbattle(bethena, elly)\nWithhold(elly, opalina)\nWordy(elly)\nUnpassable(elly)\nnot Cachinnate(elly, bethena)\nnot Cachinnate(elly, opalina)\nEmbattle(elly, bethena)\nWithhold(opalina, elly)\nEmbattle(opalina, bethena)\nEmbattle(opalina, elly)\nforall x (Unpassable(x) and Withhold(x, opalina) -> Withhold(x, bethena))\nforall x (Withhold(x, bethena) -> Curving(x))\n\nnot Swordlike(bethena)\n\ntherefore Swordlike(bethena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The solomon is blunt. The solomon warble the stuart. The solomon beaver the lira. The lira gore the stuart. The lira is tubed. The lira is formosan. The lira does not like the solomon. The lira does not like the stuart. The lira beaver the solomon. The stuart gore the lira. The stuart beaver the solomon. The stuart beaver the lira. If something is formosan and it gore the stuart then it gore the solomon. If something gore the solomon then it is volunteer. The lira gore the solomon.", "logic": "\nBlunt(solomon)\nWarble(solomon, stuart)\nBeaver(solomon, lira)\nGore(lira, stuart)\nTubed(lira)\nFormosan(lira)\nnot Warble(lira, solomon)\nnot Warble(lira, stuart)\nBeaver(lira, solomon)\nGore(stuart, lira)\nBeaver(stuart, solomon)\nBeaver(stuart, lira)\nforall x (Formosan(x) and Gore(x, stuart) -> Gore(x, solomon))\nforall x (Gore(x, solomon) -> Volunteer(x))\n\nGore(lira, solomon)\n\nFormosan(lira) and Gore(lira, stuart) and forall x (Formosan(x) and Gore(x, stuart) -> Gore(x, solomon)) -> therefore Gore(lira, solomon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The sholom is unwelcome. The sholom bowse the maisie. The sholom exsert the bernadina. The bernadina defect the maisie. The bernadina is workable. The bernadina is isogonic. The bernadina does not like the sholom. The bernadina does not like the maisie. The bernadina exsert the sholom. The maisie defect the bernadina. The maisie exsert the sholom. The maisie exsert the bernadina. If something is isogonic and it defect the maisie then it defect the sholom. If something defect the sholom then it is unclad. The bernadina does not eat the sholom.", "logic": "\nUnwelcome(sholom)\nBowse(sholom, maisie)\nExsert(sholom, bernadina)\nDefect(bernadina, maisie)\nWorkable(bernadina)\nIsogonic(bernadina)\nnot Bowse(bernadina, sholom)\nnot Bowse(bernadina, maisie)\nExsert(bernadina, sholom)\nDefect(maisie, bernadina)\nExsert(maisie, sholom)\nExsert(maisie, bernadina)\nforall x (Isogonic(x) and Defect(x, maisie) -> Defect(x, sholom))\nforall x (Defect(x, sholom) -> Unclad(x))\n\nnot Defect(bernadina, sholom)\n\nIsogonic(bernadina) and Defect(bernadina, maisie) and forall x (Isogonic(x) and Defect(x, maisie) -> Defect(x, sholom)) -> therefore Defect(bernadina, sholom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The marc is earlier. The marc anastomose the arden. The marc frogmarch the tybi. The tybi rumour the arden. The tybi is coarse. The tybi is bisontine. The tybi does not like the marc. The tybi does not like the arden. The tybi frogmarch the marc. The arden rumour the tybi. The arden frogmarch the marc. The arden frogmarch the tybi. If something is bisontine and it rumour the arden then it rumour the marc. If something rumour the marc then it is reposeful. The tybi is reposeful.", "logic": "\nEarlier(marc)\nAnastomose(marc, arden)\nFrogmarch(marc, tybi)\nRumour(tybi, arden)\nCoarse(tybi)\nBisontine(tybi)\nnot Anastomose(tybi, marc)\nnot Anastomose(tybi, arden)\nFrogmarch(tybi, marc)\nRumour(arden, tybi)\nFrogmarch(arden, marc)\nFrogmarch(arden, tybi)\nforall x (Bisontine(x) and Rumour(x, arden) -> Rumour(x, marc))\nforall x (Rumour(x, marc) -> Reposeful(x))\n\nReposeful(tybi)\n\nBisontine(tybi) and Rumour(tybi, arden) and forall x (Bisontine(x) and Rumour(x, arden) -> Rumour(x, marc)) -> therefore Rumour(tybi, marc) Rumour(tybi, marc) and forall x (Rumour(x, marc) -> Reposeful(x)) -> therefore Reposeful(tybi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The marve is placid. The marve ghost the sharline. The marve reproof the leonhard. The leonhard spin the sharline. The leonhard is trifling. The leonhard is mythic. The leonhard does not like the marve. The leonhard does not like the sharline. The leonhard reproof the marve. The sharline spin the leonhard. The sharline reproof the marve. The sharline reproof the leonhard. If something is mythic and it spin the sharline then it spin the marve. If something spin the marve then it is synonymous. The leonhard is not synonymous.", "logic": "\nPlacid(marve)\nGhost(marve, sharline)\nReproof(marve, leonhard)\nSpin(leonhard, sharline)\nTrifling(leonhard)\nMythic(leonhard)\nnot Ghost(leonhard, marve)\nnot Ghost(leonhard, sharline)\nReproof(leonhard, marve)\nSpin(sharline, leonhard)\nReproof(sharline, marve)\nReproof(sharline, leonhard)\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Spin(x, sharline) -> Spin(x, marve))\nforall x (Spin(x, marve) -> Synonymous(x))\n\nnot Synonymous(leonhard)\n\nMythic(leonhard) and Spin(leonhard, sharline) and forall x (Mythic(x) and Spin(x, sharline) -> Spin(x, marve)) -> therefore Spin(leonhard, marve) Spin(leonhard, marve) and forall x (Spin(x, marve) -> Synonymous(x)) -> therefore Synonymous(leonhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The joanna is extra. The joanna feast the aili. The joanna feint the viv. The viv shipwreck the aili. The viv is oppressive. The viv is paltry. The viv does not like the joanna. The viv does not like the aili. The viv feint the joanna. The aili shipwreck the viv. The aili feint the joanna. The aili feint the viv. If something is paltry and it shipwreck the aili then it shipwreck the joanna. If something shipwreck the joanna then it is occipital. The joanna is not occipital.", "logic": "\nExtra(joanna)\nFeast(joanna, aili)\nFeint(joanna, viv)\nShipwreck(viv, aili)\nOppressive(viv)\nPaltry(viv)\nnot Feast(viv, joanna)\nnot Feast(viv, aili)\nFeint(viv, joanna)\nShipwreck(aili, viv)\nFeint(aili, joanna)\nFeint(aili, viv)\nforall x (Paltry(x) and Shipwreck(x, aili) -> Shipwreck(x, joanna))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, joanna) -> Occipital(x))\n\nnot Occipital(joanna)\n\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, joanna) -> Occipital(x)) <- forall x (Paltry(x) and Shipwreck(x, aili) -> Shipwreck(x, joanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The corry is uppity. The corry duck the nikolai. The corry sulfur the francesco. The francesco offend the nikolai. The francesco is preferred. The francesco is vapourised. The francesco does not like the corry. The francesco does not like the nikolai. The francesco sulfur the corry. The nikolai offend the francesco. The nikolai sulfur the corry. The nikolai sulfur the francesco. If something is vapourised and it offend the nikolai then it offend the corry. If something offend the corry then it is cantonal. The corry offend the corry.", "logic": "\nUppity(corry)\nDuck(corry, nikolai)\nSulfur(corry, francesco)\nOffend(francesco, nikolai)\nPreferred(francesco)\nVapourised(francesco)\nnot Duck(francesco, corry)\nnot Duck(francesco, nikolai)\nSulfur(francesco, corry)\nOffend(nikolai, francesco)\nSulfur(nikolai, corry)\nSulfur(nikolai, francesco)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Offend(x, nikolai) -> Offend(x, corry))\nforall x (Offend(x, corry) -> Cantonal(x))\n\nOffend(corry, corry)\n\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Offend(x, nikolai) -> Offend(x, corry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The rab is here. The rab lucubrate the garrett. The rab daunt the feliza. The feliza legalize the garrett. The feliza is monegasque. The feliza is metastable. The feliza does not like the rab. The feliza does not like the garrett. The feliza daunt the rab. The garrett legalize the feliza. The garrett daunt the rab. The garrett daunt the feliza. If something is metastable and it legalize the garrett then it legalize the rab. If something legalize the rab then it is meagre. The garrett is not meagre.", "logic": "\nHere(rab)\nLucubrate(rab, garrett)\nDaunt(rab, feliza)\nLegalize(feliza, garrett)\nMonegasque(feliza)\nMetastable(feliza)\nnot Lucubrate(feliza, rab)\nnot Lucubrate(feliza, garrett)\nDaunt(feliza, rab)\nLegalize(garrett, feliza)\nDaunt(garrett, rab)\nDaunt(garrett, feliza)\nforall x (Metastable(x) and Legalize(x, garrett) -> Legalize(x, rab))\nforall x (Legalize(x, rab) -> Meagre(x))\n\nnot Meagre(garrett)\n\nforall x (Legalize(x, rab) -> Meagre(x)) <- forall x (Metastable(x) and Legalize(x, garrett) -> Legalize(x, rab)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The weber is amnesic. The weber attain the lacy. The weber disagree the tucky. The tucky excrete the lacy. The tucky is provincial. The tucky is dulled. The tucky does not like the weber. The tucky does not like the lacy. The tucky disagree the weber. The lacy excrete the tucky. The lacy disagree the weber. The lacy disagree the tucky. If something is dulled and it excrete the lacy then it excrete the weber. If something excrete the weber then it is balletic. The lacy is amnesic.", "logic": "\nAmnesic(weber)\nAttain(weber, lacy)\nDisagree(weber, tucky)\nExcrete(tucky, lacy)\nProvincial(tucky)\nDulled(tucky)\nnot Attain(tucky, weber)\nnot Attain(tucky, lacy)\nDisagree(tucky, weber)\nExcrete(lacy, tucky)\nDisagree(lacy, weber)\nDisagree(lacy, tucky)\nforall x (Dulled(x) and Excrete(x, lacy) -> Excrete(x, weber))\nforall x (Excrete(x, weber) -> Balletic(x))\n\nAmnesic(lacy)\n\nAmnesic(lacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The alida is thai. The alida moor the zach. The alida winkle the jude. The jude overpraise the zach. The jude is foiled. The jude is camphoric. The jude does not like the alida. The jude does not like the zach. The jude winkle the alida. The zach overpraise the jude. The zach winkle the alida. The zach winkle the jude. If something is camphoric and it overpraise the zach then it overpraise the alida. If something overpraise the alida then it is drawn. The zach does not like the zach.", "logic": "\nThai(alida)\nMoor(alida, zach)\nWinkle(alida, jude)\nOverpraise(jude, zach)\nFoiled(jude)\nCamphoric(jude)\nnot Moor(jude, alida)\nnot Moor(jude, zach)\nWinkle(jude, alida)\nOverpraise(zach, jude)\nWinkle(zach, alida)\nWinkle(zach, jude)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) and Overpraise(x, zach) -> Overpraise(x, alida))\nforall x (Overpraise(x, alida) -> Drawn(x))\n\nnot Moor(zach, zach)\n\nnot Moor(zach, zach) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The audre is heavenward. The audre piss the austine. The audre oyster the rudd. The rudd chase the austine. The rudd is elemental. The rudd is cognizable. The rudd does not like the audre. The rudd does not like the austine. The rudd oyster the audre. The austine chase the rudd. The austine oyster the audre. The austine oyster the rudd. If something is cognizable and it chase the austine then it chase the audre. If something chase the audre then it is unlimited. The audre is cognizable.", "logic": "\nHeavenward(audre)\nPiss(audre, austine)\nOyster(audre, rudd)\nChase(rudd, austine)\nElemental(rudd)\nCognizable(rudd)\nnot Piss(rudd, audre)\nnot Piss(rudd, austine)\nOyster(rudd, audre)\nChase(austine, rudd)\nOyster(austine, audre)\nOyster(austine, rudd)\nforall x (Cognizable(x) and Chase(x, austine) -> Chase(x, audre))\nforall x (Chase(x, audre) -> Unlimited(x))\n\nCognizable(audre)\n\nCognizable(audre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-224"} {"premises": "The monica is fulgurous. The orin suppurate the domenico. The orin does not eat the lenette. The orin junk the domenico. The domenico suppurate the monica. The lenette is subsidized. The lenette is nonnatural. If the domenico is syphilitic and the domenico does not eat the orin then the domenico is nonnatural. If someone junk the monica then the monica does not see the domenico. If the orin junk the domenico then the orin dote the domenico. If the monica suppurate the domenico then the monica suppurate the lenette. If someone suppurate the monica and the monica junk the lenette then the monica does not eat the domenico. If someone suppurate the domenico then the domenico junk the monica. The orin suppurate the domenico.", "logic": "\nFulgurous(monica)\nSuppurate(orin, domenico)\nnot Suppurate(orin, lenette)\nJunk(orin, domenico)\nSuppurate(domenico, monica)\nSubsidized(lenette)\nNonnatural(lenette)\nSyphilitic(domenico) and not Suppurate(domenico, orin) -> Nonnatural(domenico)\nforall x (Junk(x, monica) -> not Junk(monica, domenico))\nJunk(orin, domenico) -> Dote(orin, domenico)\nSuppurate(monica, domenico) -> Suppurate(monica, lenette)\nforall x (Suppurate(x, monica) and Junk(monica, lenette) -> not Suppurate(monica, domenico))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, domenico) -> Junk(domenico, monica))\n\nSuppurate(orin, domenico)\n\ntherefore Suppurate(orin, domenico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The jemmy is hebridean. The karlen defer the korry. The karlen does not eat the vasili. The karlen pivot the korry. The korry defer the jemmy. The vasili is clausal. The vasili is gaping. If the korry is threepenny and the korry does not eat the karlen then the korry is gaping. If someone pivot the jemmy then the jemmy does not see the korry. If the karlen pivot the korry then the karlen spatter the korry. If the jemmy defer the korry then the jemmy defer the vasili. If someone defer the jemmy and the jemmy pivot the vasili then the jemmy does not eat the korry. If someone defer the korry then the korry pivot the jemmy. The vasili is not gaping.", "logic": "\nHebridean(jemmy)\nDefer(karlen, korry)\nnot Defer(karlen, vasili)\nPivot(karlen, korry)\nDefer(korry, jemmy)\nClausal(vasili)\nGaping(vasili)\nThreepenny(korry) and not Defer(korry, karlen) -> Gaping(korry)\nforall x (Pivot(x, jemmy) -> not Pivot(jemmy, korry))\nPivot(karlen, korry) -> Spatter(karlen, korry)\nDefer(jemmy, korry) -> Defer(jemmy, vasili)\nforall x (Defer(x, jemmy) and Pivot(jemmy, vasili) -> not Defer(jemmy, korry))\nforall x (Defer(x, korry) -> Pivot(korry, jemmy))\n\nnot Gaping(vasili)\n\ntherefore Gaping(vasili)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The katherina is bibliotic. The jessy demodulate the melva. The jessy does not eat the wendell. The jessy object the melva. The melva demodulate the katherina. The wendell is respectful. The wendell is pointed. If the melva is unpleasant and the melva does not eat the jessy then the melva is pointed. If someone object the katherina then the katherina does not see the melva. If the jessy object the melva then the jessy tame the melva. If the katherina demodulate the melva then the katherina demodulate the wendell. If someone demodulate the katherina and the katherina object the wendell then the katherina does not eat the melva. If someone demodulate the melva then the melva object the katherina. The melva object the katherina.", "logic": "\nBibliotic(katherina)\nDemodulate(jessy, melva)\nnot Demodulate(jessy, wendell)\nObject(jessy, melva)\nDemodulate(melva, katherina)\nRespectful(wendell)\nPointed(wendell)\nUnpleasant(melva) and not Demodulate(melva, jessy) -> Pointed(melva)\nforall x (Object(x, katherina) -> not Object(katherina, melva))\nObject(jessy, melva) -> Tame(jessy, melva)\nDemodulate(katherina, melva) -> Demodulate(katherina, wendell)\nforall x (Demodulate(x, katherina) and Object(katherina, wendell) -> not Demodulate(katherina, melva))\nforall x (Demodulate(x, melva) -> Object(melva, katherina))\n\nObject(melva, katherina)\n\nDemodulate(jessy, melva) and forall x (Demodulate(x, melva) -> Object(melva, katherina)) -> therefore Object(melva, katherina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The erek is lxxii. The ken mean the dorothy. The ken does not eat the talyah. The ken dredge the dorothy. The dorothy mean the erek. The talyah is agonadal. The talyah is nascent. If the dorothy is corvine and the dorothy does not eat the ken then the dorothy is nascent. If someone dredge the erek then the erek does not see the dorothy. If the ken dredge the dorothy then the ken recurve the dorothy. If the erek mean the dorothy then the erek mean the talyah. If someone mean the erek and the erek dredge the talyah then the erek does not eat the dorothy. If someone mean the dorothy then the dorothy dredge the erek. The ken does not like the dorothy.", "logic": "\nLxxii(erek)\nMean(ken, dorothy)\nnot Mean(ken, talyah)\nDredge(ken, dorothy)\nMean(dorothy, erek)\nAgonadal(talyah)\nNascent(talyah)\nCorvine(dorothy) and not Mean(dorothy, ken) -> Nascent(dorothy)\nforall x (Dredge(x, erek) -> not Dredge(erek, dorothy))\nDredge(ken, dorothy) -> Recurve(ken, dorothy)\nMean(erek, dorothy) -> Mean(erek, talyah)\nforall x (Mean(x, erek) and Dredge(erek, talyah) -> not Mean(erek, dorothy))\nforall x (Mean(x, dorothy) -> Dredge(dorothy, erek))\n\nnot Recurve(ken, dorothy)\n\nDredge(ken, dorothy) and Dredge(ken, dorothy) -> Recurve(ken, dorothy) -> therefore Recurve(ken, dorothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The neilla is nary. The thebault unmake the annabel. The thebault does not eat the julio. The thebault dither the annabel. The annabel unmake the neilla. The julio is mitigatory. The julio is twinning. If the annabel is bestubbled and the annabel does not eat the thebault then the annabel is twinning. If someone dither the neilla then the neilla does not see the annabel. If the thebault dither the annabel then the thebault bollix the annabel. If the neilla unmake the annabel then the neilla unmake the julio. If someone unmake the neilla and the neilla dither the julio then the neilla does not eat the annabel. If someone unmake the annabel then the annabel dither the neilla. The neilla does not see the annabel.", "logic": "\nNary(neilla)\nUnmake(thebault, annabel)\nnot Unmake(thebault, julio)\nDither(thebault, annabel)\nUnmake(annabel, neilla)\nMitigatory(julio)\nTwinning(julio)\nBestubbled(annabel) and not Unmake(annabel, thebault) -> Twinning(annabel)\nforall x (Dither(x, neilla) -> not Dither(neilla, annabel))\nDither(thebault, annabel) -> Bollix(thebault, annabel)\nUnmake(neilla, annabel) -> Unmake(neilla, julio)\nforall x (Unmake(x, neilla) and Dither(neilla, julio) -> not Unmake(neilla, annabel))\nforall x (Unmake(x, annabel) -> Dither(annabel, neilla))\n\nnot Dither(neilla, annabel)\n\nUnmake(thebault, annabel) and forall x (Unmake(x, annabel) -> Dither(annabel, neilla)) -> therefore Dither(annabel, neilla) Dither(annabel, neilla) and forall x (Dither(x, neilla) -> not Dither(neilla, annabel)) -> therefore not Dither(neilla, annabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The udall is sulcate. The paula cave the danya. The paula does not eat the bella. The paula parboil the danya. The danya cave the udall. The bella is subatomic. The bella is equine. If the danya is repulsive and the danya does not eat the paula then the danya is equine. If someone parboil the udall then the udall does not see the danya. If the paula parboil the danya then the paula suspend the danya. If the udall cave the danya then the udall cave the bella. If someone cave the udall and the udall parboil the bella then the udall does not eat the danya. If someone cave the danya then the danya parboil the udall. The udall parboil the danya.", "logic": "\nSulcate(udall)\nCave(paula, danya)\nnot Cave(paula, bella)\nParboil(paula, danya)\nCave(danya, udall)\nSubatomic(bella)\nEquine(bella)\nRepulsive(danya) and not Cave(danya, paula) -> Equine(danya)\nforall x (Parboil(x, udall) -> not Parboil(udall, danya))\nParboil(paula, danya) -> Suspend(paula, danya)\nCave(udall, danya) -> Cave(udall, bella)\nforall x (Cave(x, udall) and Parboil(udall, bella) -> not Cave(udall, danya))\nforall x (Cave(x, danya) -> Parboil(danya, udall))\n\nParboil(udall, danya)\n\nCave(paula, danya) and forall x (Cave(x, danya) -> Parboil(danya, udall)) -> therefore Parboil(danya, udall) Parboil(danya, udall) and forall x (Parboil(x, udall) -> not Parboil(udall, danya)) -> therefore not Parboil(udall, danya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The floris is corsican. The westbrook disfigure the kyle. The westbrook does not eat the chris. The westbrook confront the kyle. The kyle disfigure the floris. The chris is bugged. The chris is perfumed. If the kyle is snuggled and the kyle does not eat the westbrook then the kyle is perfumed. If someone confront the floris then the floris does not see the kyle. If the westbrook confront the kyle then the westbrook concertina the kyle. If the floris disfigure the kyle then the floris disfigure the chris. If someone disfigure the floris and the floris confront the chris then the floris does not eat the kyle. If someone disfigure the kyle then the kyle confront the floris. The kyle is not perfumed.", "logic": "\nCorsican(floris)\nDisfigure(westbrook, kyle)\nnot Disfigure(westbrook, chris)\nConfront(westbrook, kyle)\nDisfigure(kyle, floris)\nBugged(chris)\nPerfumed(chris)\nSnuggled(kyle) and not Disfigure(kyle, westbrook) -> Perfumed(kyle)\nforall x (Confront(x, floris) -> not Confront(floris, kyle))\nConfront(westbrook, kyle) -> Concertina(westbrook, kyle)\nDisfigure(floris, kyle) -> Disfigure(floris, chris)\nforall x (Disfigure(x, floris) and Confront(floris, chris) -> not Disfigure(floris, kyle))\nforall x (Disfigure(x, kyle) -> Confront(kyle, floris))\n\nnot Perfumed(kyle)\n\nSnuggled(kyle) and not Disfigure(kyle, westbrook) -> Perfumed(kyle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The leslie is cedarn. The clarinda void the veriee. The clarinda does not eat the ravil. The clarinda quirk the veriee. The veriee void the leslie. The ravil is appetizing. The ravil is dolourous. If the veriee is anile and the veriee does not eat the clarinda then the veriee is dolourous. If someone quirk the leslie then the leslie does not see the veriee. If the clarinda quirk the veriee then the clarinda clamp the veriee. If the leslie void the veriee then the leslie void the ravil. If someone void the leslie and the leslie quirk the ravil then the leslie does not eat the veriee. If someone void the veriee then the veriee quirk the leslie. The leslie void the ravil.", "logic": "\nCedarn(leslie)\nVoid(clarinda, veriee)\nnot Void(clarinda, ravil)\nQuirk(clarinda, veriee)\nVoid(veriee, leslie)\nAppetizing(ravil)\nDolourous(ravil)\nAnile(veriee) and not Void(veriee, clarinda) -> Dolourous(veriee)\nforall x (Quirk(x, leslie) -> not Quirk(leslie, veriee))\nQuirk(clarinda, veriee) -> Clamp(clarinda, veriee)\nVoid(leslie, veriee) -> Void(leslie, ravil)\nforall x (Void(x, leslie) and Quirk(leslie, ravil) -> not Void(leslie, veriee))\nforall x (Void(x, veriee) -> Quirk(veriee, leslie))\n\nVoid(leslie, ravil)\n\nVoid(leslie, veriee) -> Void(leslie, ravil) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The cesya is hostile. The hannah complect the sherline. The hannah does not eat the urbano. The hannah aggravate the sherline. The sherline complect the cesya. The urbano is fortissimo. The urbano is unflagging. If the sherline is fascinated and the sherline does not eat the hannah then the sherline is unflagging. If someone aggravate the cesya then the cesya does not see the sherline. If the hannah aggravate the sherline then the hannah arborise the sherline. If the cesya complect the sherline then the cesya complect the urbano. If someone complect the cesya and the cesya aggravate the urbano then the cesya does not eat the sherline. If someone complect the sherline then the sherline aggravate the cesya. The hannah is not cold.", "logic": "\nHostile(cesya)\nComplect(hannah, sherline)\nnot Complect(hannah, urbano)\nAggravate(hannah, sherline)\nComplect(sherline, cesya)\nFortissimo(urbano)\nUnflagging(urbano)\nFascinated(sherline) and not Complect(sherline, hannah) -> Unflagging(sherline)\nforall x (Aggravate(x, cesya) -> not Aggravate(cesya, sherline))\nAggravate(hannah, sherline) -> Arborise(hannah, sherline)\nComplect(cesya, sherline) -> Complect(cesya, urbano)\nforall x (Complect(x, cesya) and Aggravate(cesya, urbano) -> not Complect(cesya, sherline))\nforall x (Complect(x, sherline) -> Aggravate(sherline, cesya))\n\nnot Cold(hannah)\n\nnot Cold(hannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The rosella is unlikely. The emmott chock the merilee. The emmott does not eat the nev. The emmott bestialise the merilee. The merilee chock the rosella. The nev is combative. The nev is assisted. If the merilee is forbidding and the merilee does not eat the emmott then the merilee is assisted. If someone bestialise the rosella then the rosella does not see the merilee. If the emmott bestialise the merilee then the emmott league the merilee. If the rosella chock the merilee then the rosella chock the nev. If someone chock the rosella and the rosella bestialise the nev then the rosella does not eat the merilee. If someone chock the merilee then the merilee bestialise the rosella. The nev chock the emmott.", "logic": "\nUnlikely(rosella)\nChock(emmott, merilee)\nnot Chock(emmott, nev)\nBestialise(emmott, merilee)\nChock(merilee, rosella)\nCombative(nev)\nAssisted(nev)\nForbidding(merilee) and not Chock(merilee, emmott) -> Assisted(merilee)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, rosella) -> not Bestialise(rosella, merilee))\nBestialise(emmott, merilee) -> League(emmott, merilee)\nChock(rosella, merilee) -> Chock(rosella, nev)\nforall x (Chock(x, rosella) and Bestialise(rosella, nev) -> not Chock(rosella, merilee))\nforall x (Chock(x, merilee) -> Bestialise(merilee, rosella))\n\nChock(nev, emmott)\n\nChock(nev, emmott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The herbert is unseen. The amelita dart the clareta. The amelita does not eat the sophronia. The amelita fondle the clareta. The clareta dart the herbert. The sophronia is cerous. The sophronia is unmerciful. If the clareta is attested and the clareta does not eat the amelita then the clareta is unmerciful. If someone fondle the herbert then the herbert does not see the clareta. If the amelita fondle the clareta then the amelita garotte the clareta. If the herbert dart the clareta then the herbert dart the sophronia. If someone dart the herbert and the herbert fondle the sophronia then the herbert does not eat the clareta. If someone dart the clareta then the clareta fondle the herbert. The clareta does not like the sophronia.", "logic": "\nUnseen(herbert)\nDart(amelita, clareta)\nnot Dart(amelita, sophronia)\nFondle(amelita, clareta)\nDart(clareta, herbert)\nCerous(sophronia)\nUnmerciful(sophronia)\nAttested(clareta) and not Dart(clareta, amelita) -> Unmerciful(clareta)\nforall x (Fondle(x, herbert) -> not Fondle(herbert, clareta))\nFondle(amelita, clareta) -> Garotte(amelita, clareta)\nDart(herbert, clareta) -> Dart(herbert, sophronia)\nforall x (Dart(x, herbert) and Fondle(herbert, sophronia) -> not Dart(herbert, clareta))\nforall x (Dart(x, clareta) -> Fondle(clareta, herbert))\n\nnot Garotte(clareta, sophronia)\n\nnot Garotte(clareta, sophronia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The nidia is guiding. The thorstein wrench the chariot. The thorstein does not eat the iggy. The thorstein take the chariot. The chariot wrench the nidia. The iggy is neglectful. The iggy is haemic. If the chariot is demotic and the chariot does not eat the thorstein then the chariot is haemic. If someone take the nidia then the nidia does not see the chariot. If the thorstein take the chariot then the thorstein regress the chariot. If the nidia wrench the chariot then the nidia wrench the iggy. If someone wrench the nidia and the nidia take the iggy then the nidia does not eat the chariot. If someone wrench the chariot then the chariot take the nidia. The chariot is guiding.", "logic": "\nGuiding(nidia)\nWrench(thorstein, chariot)\nnot Wrench(thorstein, iggy)\nTake(thorstein, chariot)\nWrench(chariot, nidia)\nNeglectful(iggy)\nHaemic(iggy)\nDemotic(chariot) and not Wrench(chariot, thorstein) -> Haemic(chariot)\nforall x (Take(x, nidia) -> not Take(nidia, chariot))\nTake(thorstein, chariot) -> Regress(thorstein, chariot)\nWrench(nidia, chariot) -> Wrench(nidia, iggy)\nforall x (Wrench(x, nidia) and Take(nidia, iggy) -> not Wrench(nidia, chariot))\nforall x (Wrench(x, chariot) -> Take(chariot, nidia))\n\nGuiding(chariot)\n\nGuiding(chariot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The jephthah proffer the davide. The jephthah proffer the roch. The jephthah manifest the davide. The jephthah is ungracious. The davide manifest the jephthah. The davide manifest the roch. The davide is proud. The davide is ungracious. The roch manifest the jephthah. The roch is hobnailed. If someone proffer the jephthah and the jephthah proffer the davide then the jephthah is hobnailed. If someone manifest the roch and the roch proffer the jephthah then the roch shorten the jephthah. If someone manifest the roch then they see the davide. If the roch shorten the jephthah and the roch manifest the davide then the roch proffer the jephthah. If someone shorten the jephthah then the jephthah shorten the roch. If someone manifest the davide then the davide shorten the jephthah. The jephthah proffer the roch.", "logic": "\nProffer(jephthah, davide)\nProffer(jephthah, roch)\nManifest(jephthah, davide)\nUngracious(jephthah)\nManifest(davide, jephthah)\nManifest(davide, roch)\nProud(davide)\nUngracious(davide)\nManifest(roch, jephthah)\nHobnailed(roch)\nforall x (Proffer(x, jephthah) and Proffer(jephthah, davide) -> Hobnailed(jephthah))\nforall x (Manifest(x, roch) and Proffer(roch, jephthah) -> Shorten(roch, jephthah))\nforall x (Manifest(x, roch) -> Shorten(x, davide))\nShorten(roch, jephthah) and Manifest(roch, davide) -> Proffer(roch, jephthah)\nforall x (Shorten(x, jephthah) -> Shorten(jephthah, roch))\nforall x (Manifest(x, davide) -> Shorten(davide, jephthah))\n\nProffer(jephthah, roch)\n\ntherefore Proffer(jephthah, roch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The carrol overpraise the daniella. The carrol overpraise the farley. The carrol belie the daniella. The carrol is molten. The daniella belie the carrol. The daniella belie the farley. The daniella is endermatic. The daniella is molten. The farley belie the carrol. The farley is thirteen. If someone overpraise the carrol and the carrol overpraise the daniella then the carrol is thirteen. If someone belie the farley and the farley overpraise the carrol then the farley polka the carrol. If someone belie the farley then they see the daniella. If the farley polka the carrol and the farley belie the daniella then the farley overpraise the carrol. If someone polka the carrol then the carrol polka the farley. If someone belie the daniella then the daniella polka the carrol. The carrol does not chase the farley.", "logic": "\nOverpraise(carrol, daniella)\nOverpraise(carrol, farley)\nBelie(carrol, daniella)\nMolten(carrol)\nBelie(daniella, carrol)\nBelie(daniella, farley)\nEndermatic(daniella)\nMolten(daniella)\nBelie(farley, carrol)\nThirteen(farley)\nforall x (Overpraise(x, carrol) and Overpraise(carrol, daniella) -> Thirteen(carrol))\nforall x (Belie(x, farley) and Overpraise(farley, carrol) -> Polka(farley, carrol))\nforall x (Belie(x, farley) -> Polka(x, daniella))\nPolka(farley, carrol) and Belie(farley, daniella) -> Overpraise(farley, carrol)\nforall x (Polka(x, carrol) -> Polka(carrol, farley))\nforall x (Belie(x, daniella) -> Polka(daniella, carrol))\n\nnot Overpraise(carrol, farley)\n\ntherefore Overpraise(carrol, farley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The doralyn misjudge the alic. The doralyn misjudge the kyla. The doralyn loot the alic. The doralyn is ruinous. The alic loot the doralyn. The alic loot the kyla. The alic is unwelcome. The alic is ruinous. The kyla loot the doralyn. The kyla is damned. If someone misjudge the doralyn and the doralyn misjudge the alic then the doralyn is damned. If someone loot the kyla and the kyla misjudge the doralyn then the kyla recess the doralyn. If someone loot the kyla then they see the alic. If the kyla recess the doralyn and the kyla loot the alic then the kyla misjudge the doralyn. If someone recess the doralyn then the doralyn recess the kyla. If someone loot the alic then the alic recess the doralyn. The alic recess the alic.", "logic": "\nMisjudge(doralyn, alic)\nMisjudge(doralyn, kyla)\nLoot(doralyn, alic)\nRuinous(doralyn)\nLoot(alic, doralyn)\nLoot(alic, kyla)\nUnwelcome(alic)\nRuinous(alic)\nLoot(kyla, doralyn)\nDamned(kyla)\nforall x (Misjudge(x, doralyn) and Misjudge(doralyn, alic) -> Damned(doralyn))\nforall x (Loot(x, kyla) and Misjudge(kyla, doralyn) -> Recess(kyla, doralyn))\nforall x (Loot(x, kyla) -> Recess(x, alic))\nRecess(kyla, doralyn) and Loot(kyla, alic) -> Misjudge(kyla, doralyn)\nforall x (Recess(x, doralyn) -> Recess(doralyn, kyla))\nforall x (Loot(x, alic) -> Recess(alic, doralyn))\n\nRecess(alic, alic)\n\nLoot(alic, kyla) and forall x (Loot(x, kyla) -> Recess(x, alic)) -> therefore Recess(alic, alic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The lorry dehumanise the miguelita. The lorry dehumanise the cicily. The lorry scrap the miguelita. The lorry is timorese. The miguelita scrap the lorry. The miguelita scrap the cicily. The miguelita is latin. The miguelita is timorese. The cicily scrap the lorry. The cicily is lovesick. If someone dehumanise the lorry and the lorry dehumanise the miguelita then the lorry is lovesick. If someone scrap the cicily and the cicily dehumanise the lorry then the cicily occupy the lorry. If someone scrap the cicily then they see the miguelita. If the cicily occupy the lorry and the cicily scrap the miguelita then the cicily dehumanise the lorry. If someone occupy the lorry then the lorry occupy the cicily. If someone scrap the miguelita then the miguelita occupy the lorry. The miguelita does not see the lorry.", "logic": "\nDehumanise(lorry, miguelita)\nDehumanise(lorry, cicily)\nScrap(lorry, miguelita)\nTimorese(lorry)\nScrap(miguelita, lorry)\nScrap(miguelita, cicily)\nLatin(miguelita)\nTimorese(miguelita)\nScrap(cicily, lorry)\nLovesick(cicily)\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, lorry) and Dehumanise(lorry, miguelita) -> Lovesick(lorry))\nforall x (Scrap(x, cicily) and Dehumanise(cicily, lorry) -> Occupy(cicily, lorry))\nforall x (Scrap(x, cicily) -> Occupy(x, miguelita))\nOccupy(cicily, lorry) and Scrap(cicily, miguelita) -> Dehumanise(cicily, lorry)\nforall x (Occupy(x, lorry) -> Occupy(lorry, cicily))\nforall x (Scrap(x, miguelita) -> Occupy(miguelita, lorry))\n\nnot Occupy(miguelita, lorry)\n\nScrap(lorry, miguelita) and forall x (Scrap(x, miguelita) -> Occupy(miguelita, lorry)) -> therefore Occupy(miguelita, lorry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The evelina insulate the kirsten. The evelina insulate the pearle. The evelina fraction the kirsten. The evelina is irritative. The kirsten fraction the evelina. The kirsten fraction the pearle. The kirsten is amort. The kirsten is irritative. The pearle fraction the evelina. The pearle is pitiable. If someone insulate the evelina and the evelina insulate the kirsten then the evelina is pitiable. If someone fraction the pearle and the pearle insulate the evelina then the pearle involve the evelina. If someone fraction the pearle then they see the kirsten. If the pearle involve the evelina and the pearle fraction the kirsten then the pearle insulate the evelina. If someone involve the evelina then the evelina involve the pearle. If someone fraction the kirsten then the kirsten involve the evelina. The evelina involve the pearle.", "logic": "\nInsulate(evelina, kirsten)\nInsulate(evelina, pearle)\nFraction(evelina, kirsten)\nIrritative(evelina)\nFraction(kirsten, evelina)\nFraction(kirsten, pearle)\nAmort(kirsten)\nIrritative(kirsten)\nFraction(pearle, evelina)\nPitiable(pearle)\nforall x (Insulate(x, evelina) and Insulate(evelina, kirsten) -> Pitiable(evelina))\nforall x (Fraction(x, pearle) and Insulate(pearle, evelina) -> Involve(pearle, evelina))\nforall x (Fraction(x, pearle) -> Involve(x, kirsten))\nInvolve(pearle, evelina) and Fraction(pearle, kirsten) -> Insulate(pearle, evelina)\nforall x (Involve(x, evelina) -> Involve(evelina, pearle))\nforall x (Fraction(x, kirsten) -> Involve(kirsten, evelina))\n\nInvolve(evelina, pearle)\n\nFraction(evelina, kirsten) and forall x (Fraction(x, kirsten) -> Involve(kirsten, evelina)) -> therefore Involve(kirsten, evelina) Involve(kirsten, evelina) and forall x (Involve(x, evelina) -> Involve(evelina, pearle)) -> therefore Involve(evelina, pearle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The alf succeed the eleonora. The alf succeed the devan. The alf effectuate the eleonora. The alf is detested. The eleonora effectuate the alf. The eleonora effectuate the devan. The eleonora is migrant. The eleonora is detested. The devan effectuate the alf. The devan is crabwise. If someone succeed the alf and the alf succeed the eleonora then the alf is crabwise. If someone effectuate the devan and the devan succeed the alf then the devan dwindle the alf. If someone effectuate the devan then they see the eleonora. If the devan dwindle the alf and the devan effectuate the eleonora then the devan succeed the alf. If someone dwindle the alf then the alf dwindle the devan. If someone effectuate the eleonora then the eleonora dwindle the alf. The alf does not see the devan.", "logic": "\nSucceed(alf, eleonora)\nSucceed(alf, devan)\nEffectuate(alf, eleonora)\nDetested(alf)\nEffectuate(eleonora, alf)\nEffectuate(eleonora, devan)\nMigrant(eleonora)\nDetested(eleonora)\nEffectuate(devan, alf)\nCrabwise(devan)\nforall x (Succeed(x, alf) and Succeed(alf, eleonora) -> Crabwise(alf))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, devan) and Succeed(devan, alf) -> Dwindle(devan, alf))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, devan) -> Dwindle(x, eleonora))\nDwindle(devan, alf) and Effectuate(devan, eleonora) -> Succeed(devan, alf)\nforall x (Dwindle(x, alf) -> Dwindle(alf, devan))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, eleonora) -> Dwindle(eleonora, alf))\n\nnot Dwindle(alf, devan)\n\nEffectuate(alf, eleonora) and forall x (Effectuate(x, eleonora) -> Dwindle(eleonora, alf)) -> therefore Dwindle(eleonora, alf) Dwindle(eleonora, alf) and forall x (Dwindle(x, alf) -> Dwindle(alf, devan)) -> therefore Dwindle(alf, devan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The marlee brain the ike. The marlee brain the sybila. The marlee overstate the ike. The marlee is acquired. The ike overstate the marlee. The ike overstate the sybila. The ike is bardic. The ike is acquired. The sybila overstate the marlee. The sybila is comatose. If someone brain the marlee and the marlee brain the ike then the marlee is comatose. If someone overstate the sybila and the sybila brain the marlee then the sybila bewitch the marlee. If someone overstate the sybila then they see the ike. If the sybila bewitch the marlee and the sybila overstate the ike then the sybila brain the marlee. If someone bewitch the marlee then the marlee bewitch the sybila. If someone overstate the ike then the ike bewitch the marlee. The marlee is not comatose.", "logic": "\nBrain(marlee, ike)\nBrain(marlee, sybila)\nOverstate(marlee, ike)\nAcquired(marlee)\nOverstate(ike, marlee)\nOverstate(ike, sybila)\nBardic(ike)\nAcquired(ike)\nOverstate(sybila, marlee)\nComatose(sybila)\nforall x (Brain(x, marlee) and Brain(marlee, ike) -> Comatose(marlee))\nforall x (Overstate(x, sybila) and Brain(sybila, marlee) -> Bewitch(sybila, marlee))\nforall x (Overstate(x, sybila) -> Bewitch(x, ike))\nBewitch(sybila, marlee) and Overstate(sybila, ike) -> Brain(sybila, marlee)\nforall x (Bewitch(x, marlee) -> Bewitch(marlee, sybila))\nforall x (Overstate(x, ike) -> Bewitch(ike, marlee))\n\nnot Comatose(marlee)\n\nforall x (Brain(x, marlee) and Brain(marlee, ike) -> Comatose(marlee)) <- Bewitch(sybila, marlee) and Overstate(sybila, ike) -> Brain(sybila, marlee) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The thadeus bulletin the stephana. The thadeus bulletin the amabel. The thadeus carouse the stephana. The thadeus is stingy. The stephana carouse the thadeus. The stephana carouse the amabel. The stephana is hemic. The stephana is stingy. The amabel carouse the thadeus. The amabel is gerundial. If someone bulletin the thadeus and the thadeus bulletin the stephana then the thadeus is gerundial. If someone carouse the amabel and the amabel bulletin the thadeus then the amabel background the thadeus. If someone carouse the amabel then they see the stephana. If the amabel background the thadeus and the amabel carouse the stephana then the amabel bulletin the thadeus. If someone background the thadeus then the thadeus background the amabel. If someone carouse the stephana then the stephana background the thadeus. The amabel background the thadeus.", "logic": "\nBulletin(thadeus, stephana)\nBulletin(thadeus, amabel)\nCarouse(thadeus, stephana)\nStingy(thadeus)\nCarouse(stephana, thadeus)\nCarouse(stephana, amabel)\nHemic(stephana)\nStingy(stephana)\nCarouse(amabel, thadeus)\nGerundial(amabel)\nforall x (Bulletin(x, thadeus) and Bulletin(thadeus, stephana) -> Gerundial(thadeus))\nforall x (Carouse(x, amabel) and Bulletin(amabel, thadeus) -> Background(amabel, thadeus))\nforall x (Carouse(x, amabel) -> Background(x, stephana))\nBackground(amabel, thadeus) and Carouse(amabel, stephana) -> Bulletin(amabel, thadeus)\nforall x (Background(x, thadeus) -> Background(thadeus, amabel))\nforall x (Carouse(x, stephana) -> Background(stephana, thadeus))\n\nBackground(amabel, thadeus)\n\nforall x (Carouse(x, amabel) and Bulletin(amabel, thadeus) -> Background(amabel, thadeus)) <- Background(amabel, thadeus) and Carouse(amabel, stephana) -> Bulletin(amabel, thadeus) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The roarke baronetise the kirk. The roarke baronetise the eleonora. The roarke moisturize the kirk. The roarke is ludicrous. The kirk moisturize the roarke. The kirk moisturize the eleonora. The kirk is abusive. The kirk is ludicrous. The eleonora moisturize the roarke. The eleonora is reduced. If someone baronetise the roarke and the roarke baronetise the kirk then the roarke is reduced. If someone moisturize the eleonora and the eleonora baronetise the roarke then the eleonora interpose the roarke. If someone moisturize the eleonora then they see the kirk. If the eleonora interpose the roarke and the eleonora moisturize the kirk then the eleonora baronetise the roarke. If someone interpose the roarke then the roarke interpose the eleonora. If someone moisturize the kirk then the kirk interpose the roarke. The eleonora does not chase the roarke.", "logic": "\nBaronetise(roarke, kirk)\nBaronetise(roarke, eleonora)\nMoisturize(roarke, kirk)\nLudicrous(roarke)\nMoisturize(kirk, roarke)\nMoisturize(kirk, eleonora)\nAbusive(kirk)\nLudicrous(kirk)\nMoisturize(eleonora, roarke)\nReduced(eleonora)\nforall x (Baronetise(x, roarke) and Baronetise(roarke, kirk) -> Reduced(roarke))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, eleonora) and Baronetise(eleonora, roarke) -> Interpose(eleonora, roarke))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, eleonora) -> Interpose(x, kirk))\nInterpose(eleonora, roarke) and Moisturize(eleonora, kirk) -> Baronetise(eleonora, roarke)\nforall x (Interpose(x, roarke) -> Interpose(roarke, eleonora))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, kirk) -> Interpose(kirk, roarke))\n\nnot Baronetise(eleonora, roarke)\n\nInterpose(eleonora, roarke) and Moisturize(eleonora, kirk) -> Baronetise(eleonora, roarke) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The chen allot the antoni. The chen allot the wat. The chen reread the antoni. The chen is falciform. The antoni reread the chen. The antoni reread the wat. The antoni is resultant. The antoni is falciform. The wat reread the chen. The wat is untrained. If someone allot the chen and the chen allot the antoni then the chen is untrained. If someone reread the wat and the wat allot the chen then the wat romanise the chen. If someone reread the wat then they see the antoni. If the wat romanise the chen and the wat reread the antoni then the wat allot the chen. If someone romanise the chen then the chen romanise the wat. If someone reread the antoni then the antoni romanise the chen. The chen reread the chen.", "logic": "\nAllot(chen, antoni)\nAllot(chen, wat)\nReread(chen, antoni)\nFalciform(chen)\nReread(antoni, chen)\nReread(antoni, wat)\nResultant(antoni)\nFalciform(antoni)\nReread(wat, chen)\nUntrained(wat)\nforall x (Allot(x, chen) and Allot(chen, antoni) -> Untrained(chen))\nforall x (Reread(x, wat) and Allot(wat, chen) -> Romanise(wat, chen))\nforall x (Reread(x, wat) -> Romanise(x, antoni))\nRomanise(wat, chen) and Reread(wat, antoni) -> Allot(wat, chen)\nforall x (Romanise(x, chen) -> Romanise(chen, wat))\nforall x (Reread(x, antoni) -> Romanise(antoni, chen))\n\nReread(chen, chen)\n\nReread(chen, chen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The sanford chair the honor. The sanford chair the tate. The sanford bitch the honor. The sanford is equipped. The honor bitch the sanford. The honor bitch the tate. The honor is calm. The honor is equipped. The tate bitch the sanford. The tate is anguine. If someone chair the sanford and the sanford chair the honor then the sanford is anguine. If someone bitch the tate and the tate chair the sanford then the tate putty the sanford. If someone bitch the tate then they see the honor. If the tate putty the sanford and the tate bitch the honor then the tate chair the sanford. If someone putty the sanford then the sanford putty the tate. If someone bitch the honor then the honor putty the sanford. The sanford is not blue.", "logic": "\nChair(sanford, honor)\nChair(sanford, tate)\nBitch(sanford, honor)\nEquipped(sanford)\nBitch(honor, sanford)\nBitch(honor, tate)\nCalm(honor)\nEquipped(honor)\nBitch(tate, sanford)\nAnguine(tate)\nforall x (Chair(x, sanford) and Chair(sanford, honor) -> Anguine(sanford))\nforall x (Bitch(x, tate) and Chair(tate, sanford) -> Putty(tate, sanford))\nforall x (Bitch(x, tate) -> Putty(x, honor))\nPutty(tate, sanford) and Bitch(tate, honor) -> Chair(tate, sanford)\nforall x (Putty(x, sanford) -> Putty(sanford, tate))\nforall x (Bitch(x, honor) -> Putty(honor, sanford))\n\nnot Blue(sanford)\n\nnot Blue(sanford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "The emmalynne enrobe the han. The emmalynne enrobe the jania. The emmalynne stoke the han. The emmalynne is penetrable. The han stoke the emmalynne. The han stoke the jania. The han is bewildered. The han is penetrable. The jania stoke the emmalynne. The jania is heterodyne. If someone enrobe the emmalynne and the emmalynne enrobe the han then the emmalynne is heterodyne. If someone stoke the jania and the jania enrobe the emmalynne then the jania mongrelise the emmalynne. If someone stoke the jania then they see the han. If the jania mongrelise the emmalynne and the jania stoke the han then the jania enrobe the emmalynne. If someone mongrelise the emmalynne then the emmalynne mongrelise the jania. If someone stoke the han then the han mongrelise the emmalynne. The emmalynne is young.", "logic": "\nEnrobe(emmalynne, han)\nEnrobe(emmalynne, jania)\nStoke(emmalynne, han)\nPenetrable(emmalynne)\nStoke(han, emmalynne)\nStoke(han, jania)\nBewildered(han)\nPenetrable(han)\nStoke(jania, emmalynne)\nHeterodyne(jania)\nforall x (Enrobe(x, emmalynne) and Enrobe(emmalynne, han) -> Heterodyne(emmalynne))\nforall x (Stoke(x, jania) and Enrobe(jania, emmalynne) -> Mongrelise(jania, emmalynne))\nforall x (Stoke(x, jania) -> Mongrelise(x, han))\nMongrelise(jania, emmalynne) and Stoke(jania, han) -> Enrobe(jania, emmalynne)\nforall x (Mongrelise(x, emmalynne) -> Mongrelise(emmalynne, jania))\nforall x (Stoke(x, han) -> Mongrelise(han, emmalynne))\n\nYoung(emmalynne)\n\nYoung(emmalynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2101"} {"premises": "Butch is not clement. Butch is leibnizian. Butch is favourite. Butch is not opulent. Butch is reasoned. Alma is deathly. Alma is leibnizian. Alma is not favourite. Alma is not opulent. Alma is reasoned. If something is favourite and not reasoned then it is opulent. Cold, reasoned things are clement. If something is favourite and limpid then it is clement. If something is deathly then it is clement. If something is reasoned and clement then it is limpid. All opulent things are not limpid. Quiet things are favourite. If something is limpid and not reasoned then it is not deathly. Alma is reasoned.", "logic": "\nnot Clement(butch)\nLeibnizian(butch)\nFavourite(butch)\nnot Opulent(butch)\nReasoned(butch)\nDeathly(alma)\nLeibnizian(alma)\nnot Favourite(alma)\nnot Opulent(alma)\nReasoned(alma)\nforall x (Favourite(x) and not Reasoned(x) -> Opulent(x))\nforall x (Deathly(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Clement(x))\nforall x (Favourite(x) and Limpid(x) -> Clement(x))\nforall x (Deathly(x) -> Clement(x))\nforall x (Reasoned(x) and Clement(x) -> Limpid(x))\nforall x (Opulent(x) -> not Limpid(x))\nforall x (Opulent(x) -> Favourite(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) and not Reasoned(x) -> not Deathly(x))\n\nReasoned(alma)\n\ntherefore Reasoned(alma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "Linn is not reposeful. Linn is bacchanal. Linn is inherited. Linn is not sonsie. Linn is antiblack. Annalisa is staple. Annalisa is bacchanal. Annalisa is not inherited. Annalisa is not sonsie. Annalisa is antiblack. If something is inherited and not antiblack then it is sonsie. Cold, antiblack things are reposeful. If something is inherited and solo then it is reposeful. If something is staple then it is reposeful. If something is antiblack and reposeful then it is solo. All sonsie things are not solo. Quiet things are inherited. If something is solo and not antiblack then it is not staple. Linn is not inherited.", "logic": "\nnot Reposeful(linn)\nBacchanal(linn)\nInherited(linn)\nnot Sonsie(linn)\nAntiblack(linn)\nStaple(annalisa)\nBacchanal(annalisa)\nnot Inherited(annalisa)\nnot Sonsie(annalisa)\nAntiblack(annalisa)\nforall x (Inherited(x) and not Antiblack(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Staple(x) and Antiblack(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Inherited(x) and Solo(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Staple(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) -> not Solo(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) -> Inherited(x))\nforall x (Solo(x) and not Antiblack(x) -> not Staple(x))\n\nnot Inherited(linn)\n\ntherefore Inherited(linn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "Cariotta is not gnarly. Cariotta is tutelar. Cariotta is myelinated. Cariotta is not panoptic. Cariotta is dimorphic. Kane is iridic. Kane is tutelar. Kane is not myelinated. Kane is not panoptic. Kane is dimorphic. If something is myelinated and not dimorphic then it is panoptic. Cold, dimorphic things are gnarly. If something is myelinated and slicked then it is gnarly. If something is iridic then it is gnarly. If something is dimorphic and gnarly then it is slicked. All panoptic things are not slicked. Quiet things are myelinated. If something is slicked and not dimorphic then it is not iridic. Kane is gnarly.", "logic": "\nnot Gnarly(cariotta)\nTutelar(cariotta)\nMyelinated(cariotta)\nnot Panoptic(cariotta)\nDimorphic(cariotta)\nIridic(kane)\nTutelar(kane)\nnot Myelinated(kane)\nnot Panoptic(kane)\nDimorphic(kane)\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and not Dimorphic(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Iridic(x) and Dimorphic(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and Slicked(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nforall x (Iridic(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and Gnarly(x) -> Slicked(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> not Slicked(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) and not Dimorphic(x) -> not Iridic(x))\n\nGnarly(kane)\n\nIridic(kane) and forall x (Iridic(x) -> Gnarly(x)) -> therefore Gnarly(kane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "Jania is not honeyed. Jania is garbed. Jania is skim. Jania is not wigged. Jania is overfull. Lisha is lordly. Lisha is garbed. Lisha is not skim. Lisha is not wigged. Lisha is overfull. If something is skim and not overfull then it is wigged. Cold, overfull things are honeyed. If something is skim and sparse then it is honeyed. If something is lordly then it is honeyed. If something is overfull and honeyed then it is sparse. All wigged things are not sparse. Quiet things are skim. If something is sparse and not overfull then it is not lordly. Lisha is not honeyed.", "logic": "\nnot Honeyed(jania)\nGarbed(jania)\nSkim(jania)\nnot Wigged(jania)\nOverfull(jania)\nLordly(lisha)\nGarbed(lisha)\nnot Skim(lisha)\nnot Wigged(lisha)\nOverfull(lisha)\nforall x (Skim(x) and not Overfull(x) -> Wigged(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) and Overfull(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Skim(x) and Sparse(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Overfull(x) and Honeyed(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Wigged(x) -> not Sparse(x))\nforall x (Wigged(x) -> Skim(x))\nforall x (Sparse(x) and not Overfull(x) -> not Lordly(x))\n\nnot Honeyed(lisha)\n\nLordly(lisha) and forall x (Lordly(x) -> Honeyed(x)) -> therefore Honeyed(lisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "Koral is not disputable. Koral is unengaged. Koral is eurasian. Koral is not brisk. Koral is racking. Libby is haematic. Libby is unengaged. Libby is not eurasian. Libby is not brisk. Libby is racking. If something is eurasian and not racking then it is brisk. Cold, racking things are disputable. If something is eurasian and danish then it is disputable. If something is haematic then it is disputable. If something is racking and disputable then it is danish. All brisk things are not danish. Quiet things are eurasian. If something is danish and not racking then it is not haematic. Libby is danish.", "logic": "\nnot Disputable(koral)\nUnengaged(koral)\nEurasian(koral)\nnot Brisk(koral)\nRacking(koral)\nHaematic(libby)\nUnengaged(libby)\nnot Eurasian(libby)\nnot Brisk(libby)\nRacking(libby)\nforall x (Eurasian(x) and not Racking(x) -> Brisk(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) and Racking(x) -> Disputable(x))\nforall x (Eurasian(x) and Danish(x) -> Disputable(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) -> Disputable(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) and Disputable(x) -> Danish(x))\nforall x (Brisk(x) -> not Danish(x))\nforall x (Brisk(x) -> Eurasian(x))\nforall x (Danish(x) and not Racking(x) -> not Haematic(x))\n\nDanish(libby)\n\nHaematic(libby) and forall x (Haematic(x) -> Disputable(x)) -> therefore Disputable(libby) Racking(libby) and Disputable(libby) and forall x (Racking(x) and Disputable(x) -> Danish(x)) -> therefore Danish(libby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "Camala is not apropos. Camala is porticoed. Camala is tiring. Camala is not zany. Camala is moonstruck. Paten is receding. Paten is porticoed. Paten is not tiring. Paten is not zany. Paten is moonstruck. If something is tiring and not moonstruck then it is zany. Cold, moonstruck things are apropos. If something is tiring and moneran then it is apropos. If something is receding then it is apropos. If something is moonstruck and apropos then it is moneran. All zany things are not moneran. Quiet things are tiring. If something is moneran and not moonstruck then it is not receding. Paten is not moneran.", "logic": "\nnot Apropos(camala)\nPorticoed(camala)\nTiring(camala)\nnot Zany(camala)\nMoonstruck(camala)\nReceding(paten)\nPorticoed(paten)\nnot Tiring(paten)\nnot Zany(paten)\nMoonstruck(paten)\nforall x (Tiring(x) and not Moonstruck(x) -> Zany(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) and Moonstruck(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Tiring(x) and Moneran(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Moonstruck(x) and Apropos(x) -> Moneran(x))\nforall x (Zany(x) -> not Moneran(x))\nforall x (Zany(x) -> Tiring(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) and not Moonstruck(x) -> not Receding(x))\n\nnot Moneran(paten)\n\nReceding(paten) and forall x (Receding(x) -> Apropos(x)) -> therefore Apropos(paten) Moonstruck(paten) and Apropos(paten) and forall x (Moonstruck(x) and Apropos(x) -> Moneran(x)) -> therefore Moneran(paten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "Pryce is not tormented. Pryce is unsloped. Pryce is stainable. Pryce is not drugless. Pryce is dandyish. Penn is weeny. Penn is unsloped. Penn is not stainable. Penn is not drugless. Penn is dandyish. If something is stainable and not dandyish then it is drugless. Cold, dandyish things are tormented. If something is stainable and uphill then it is tormented. If something is weeny then it is tormented. If something is dandyish and tormented then it is uphill. All drugless things are not uphill. Quiet things are stainable. If something is uphill and not dandyish then it is not weeny. Pryce is not uphill.", "logic": "\nnot Tormented(pryce)\nUnsloped(pryce)\nStainable(pryce)\nnot Drugless(pryce)\nDandyish(pryce)\nWeeny(penn)\nUnsloped(penn)\nnot Stainable(penn)\nnot Drugless(penn)\nDandyish(penn)\nforall x (Stainable(x) and not Dandyish(x) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) and Dandyish(x) -> Tormented(x))\nforall x (Stainable(x) and Uphill(x) -> Tormented(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) -> Tormented(x))\nforall x (Dandyish(x) and Tormented(x) -> Uphill(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> not Uphill(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Uphill(x) and not Dandyish(x) -> not Weeny(x))\n\nnot Uphill(pryce)\n\nforall x (Dandyish(x) and Tormented(x) -> Uphill(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "Rolando is not edematous. Rolando is duplex. Rolando is agaze. Rolando is not aplanatic. Rolando is insane. Nananne is subfusc. Nananne is duplex. Nananne is not agaze. Nananne is not aplanatic. Nananne is insane. If something is agaze and not insane then it is aplanatic. Cold, insane things are edematous. If something is agaze and harried then it is edematous. If something is subfusc then it is edematous. If something is insane and edematous then it is harried. All aplanatic things are not harried. Quiet things are agaze. If something is harried and not insane then it is not subfusc. Rolando is subfusc.", "logic": "\nnot Edematous(rolando)\nDuplex(rolando)\nAgaze(rolando)\nnot Aplanatic(rolando)\nInsane(rolando)\nSubfusc(nananne)\nDuplex(nananne)\nnot Agaze(nananne)\nnot Aplanatic(nananne)\nInsane(nananne)\nforall x (Agaze(x) and not Insane(x) -> Aplanatic(x))\nforall x (Subfusc(x) and Insane(x) -> Edematous(x))\nforall x (Agaze(x) and Harried(x) -> Edematous(x))\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Edematous(x))\nforall x (Insane(x) and Edematous(x) -> Harried(x))\nforall x (Aplanatic(x) -> not Harried(x))\nforall x (Aplanatic(x) -> Agaze(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) and not Insane(x) -> not Subfusc(x))\n\nSubfusc(rolando)\n\nSubfusc(rolando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1061"} {"premises": "The burta foment the verine. The burta is inducive. The burta is antebellum. The dryke foment the burta. The dryke foment the verine. The dryke is unpierced. The dryke is antebellum. The dryke predestine the verine. The verine foment the burta. The verine foment the dryke. The verine is unpierced. The verine is antebellum. The verine is aquiline. The verine is caulescent. The verine snuggle the burta. If something foment the verine then it is caulescent. If something foment the dryke and it snuggle the verine then the verine snuggle the dryke. If something is unpierced and it predestine the dryke then the dryke foment the verine. If something is caulescent then it foment the dryke. If something predestine the burta then the burta foment the verine. If something predestine the verine and it foment the dryke then the dryke predestine the burta. If something snuggle the verine and the verine snuggle the dryke then the dryke snuggle the verine. If something snuggle the burta and it foment the verine then the verine predestine the burta. The dryke foment the burta.", "logic": "\nFoment(burta, verine)\nInducive(burta)\nAntebellum(burta)\nFoment(dryke, burta)\nFoment(dryke, verine)\nUnpierced(dryke)\nAntebellum(dryke)\nPredestine(dryke, verine)\nFoment(verine, burta)\nFoment(verine, dryke)\nUnpierced(verine)\nAntebellum(verine)\nAquiline(verine)\nCaulescent(verine)\nSnuggle(verine, burta)\nforall x (Foment(x, verine) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Foment(x, dryke) and Snuggle(x, verine) -> Snuggle(verine, dryke))\nforall x (Unpierced(x) and Predestine(x, dryke) -> Foment(dryke, verine))\nforall x (Caulescent(x) -> Foment(x, dryke))\nforall x (Predestine(x, burta) -> Foment(burta, verine))\nforall x (Predestine(x, verine) and Foment(x, dryke) -> Predestine(dryke, burta))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, verine) and Snuggle(verine, dryke) -> Snuggle(dryke, verine))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, burta) and Foment(x, verine) -> Predestine(verine, burta))\n\nFoment(dryke, burta)\n\ntherefore Foment(dryke, burta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The loralie baronetize the marielle. The loralie is unrepaired. The loralie is definable. The heinrich baronetize the loralie. The heinrich baronetize the marielle. The heinrich is lacklustre. The heinrich is definable. The heinrich rename the marielle. The marielle baronetize the loralie. The marielle baronetize the heinrich. The marielle is lacklustre. The marielle is definable. The marielle is watertight. The marielle is wealthy. The marielle snorkel the loralie. If something baronetize the marielle then it is wealthy. If something baronetize the heinrich and it snorkel the marielle then the marielle snorkel the heinrich. If something is lacklustre and it rename the heinrich then the heinrich baronetize the marielle. If something is wealthy then it baronetize the heinrich. If something rename the loralie then the loralie baronetize the marielle. If something rename the marielle and it baronetize the heinrich then the heinrich rename the loralie. If something snorkel the marielle and the marielle snorkel the heinrich then the heinrich snorkel the marielle. If something snorkel the loralie and it baronetize the marielle then the marielle rename the loralie. The loralie is not unrepaired.", "logic": "\nBaronetize(loralie, marielle)\nUnrepaired(loralie)\nDefinable(loralie)\nBaronetize(heinrich, loralie)\nBaronetize(heinrich, marielle)\nLacklustre(heinrich)\nDefinable(heinrich)\nRename(heinrich, marielle)\nBaronetize(marielle, loralie)\nBaronetize(marielle, heinrich)\nLacklustre(marielle)\nDefinable(marielle)\nWatertight(marielle)\nWealthy(marielle)\nSnorkel(marielle, loralie)\nforall x (Baronetize(x, marielle) -> Wealthy(x))\nforall x (Baronetize(x, heinrich) and Snorkel(x, marielle) -> Snorkel(marielle, heinrich))\nforall x (Lacklustre(x) and Rename(x, heinrich) -> Baronetize(heinrich, marielle))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) -> Baronetize(x, heinrich))\nforall x (Rename(x, loralie) -> Baronetize(loralie, marielle))\nforall x (Rename(x, marielle) and Baronetize(x, heinrich) -> Rename(heinrich, loralie))\nforall x (Snorkel(x, marielle) and Snorkel(marielle, heinrich) -> Snorkel(heinrich, marielle))\nforall x (Snorkel(x, loralie) and Baronetize(x, marielle) -> Rename(marielle, loralie))\n\nnot Unrepaired(loralie)\n\ntherefore Unrepaired(loralie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The danette dishonour the dorine. The danette is aboulic. The danette is glistering. The thane dishonour the danette. The thane dishonour the dorine. The thane is bluish. The thane is glistering. The thane laicise the dorine. The dorine dishonour the danette. The dorine dishonour the thane. The dorine is bluish. The dorine is glistering. The dorine is tegular. The dorine is borderline. The dorine relay the danette. If something dishonour the dorine then it is borderline. If something dishonour the thane and it relay the dorine then the dorine relay the thane. If something is bluish and it laicise the thane then the thane dishonour the dorine. If something is borderline then it dishonour the thane. If something laicise the danette then the danette dishonour the dorine. If something laicise the dorine and it dishonour the thane then the thane laicise the danette. If something relay the dorine and the dorine relay the thane then the thane relay the dorine. If something relay the danette and it dishonour the dorine then the dorine laicise the danette. The thane is borderline.", "logic": "\nDishonour(danette, dorine)\nAboulic(danette)\nGlistering(danette)\nDishonour(thane, danette)\nDishonour(thane, dorine)\nBluish(thane)\nGlistering(thane)\nLaicise(thane, dorine)\nDishonour(dorine, danette)\nDishonour(dorine, thane)\nBluish(dorine)\nGlistering(dorine)\nTegular(dorine)\nBorderline(dorine)\nRelay(dorine, danette)\nforall x (Dishonour(x, dorine) -> Borderline(x))\nforall x (Dishonour(x, thane) and Relay(x, dorine) -> Relay(dorine, thane))\nforall x (Bluish(x) and Laicise(x, thane) -> Dishonour(thane, dorine))\nforall x (Borderline(x) -> Dishonour(x, thane))\nforall x (Laicise(x, danette) -> Dishonour(danette, dorine))\nforall x (Laicise(x, dorine) and Dishonour(x, thane) -> Laicise(thane, danette))\nforall x (Relay(x, dorine) and Relay(dorine, thane) -> Relay(thane, dorine))\nforall x (Relay(x, danette) and Dishonour(x, dorine) -> Laicise(dorine, danette))\n\nBorderline(thane)\n\nDishonour(thane, dorine) and forall x (Dishonour(x, dorine) -> Borderline(x)) -> therefore Borderline(thane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The christof peptise the griswold. The christof is topped. The christof is prodromal. The howie peptise the christof. The howie peptise the griswold. The howie is anaphasic. The howie is prodromal. The howie vesicate the griswold. The griswold peptise the christof. The griswold peptise the howie. The griswold is anaphasic. The griswold is prodromal. The griswold is traitorous. The griswold is physical. The griswold house the christof. If something peptise the griswold then it is physical. If something peptise the howie and it house the griswold then the griswold house the howie. If something is anaphasic and it vesicate the howie then the howie peptise the griswold. If something is physical then it peptise the howie. If something vesicate the christof then the christof peptise the griswold. If something vesicate the griswold and it peptise the howie then the howie vesicate the christof. If something house the griswold and the griswold house the howie then the howie house the griswold. If something house the christof and it peptise the griswold then the griswold vesicate the christof. The christof is not physical.", "logic": "\nPeptise(christof, griswold)\nTopped(christof)\nProdromal(christof)\nPeptise(howie, christof)\nPeptise(howie, griswold)\nAnaphasic(howie)\nProdromal(howie)\nVesicate(howie, griswold)\nPeptise(griswold, christof)\nPeptise(griswold, howie)\nAnaphasic(griswold)\nProdromal(griswold)\nTraitorous(griswold)\nPhysical(griswold)\nHouse(griswold, christof)\nforall x (Peptise(x, griswold) -> Physical(x))\nforall x (Peptise(x, howie) and House(x, griswold) -> House(griswold, howie))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Vesicate(x, howie) -> Peptise(howie, griswold))\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Peptise(x, howie))\nforall x (Vesicate(x, christof) -> Peptise(christof, griswold))\nforall x (Vesicate(x, griswold) and Peptise(x, howie) -> Vesicate(howie, christof))\nforall x (House(x, griswold) and House(griswold, howie) -> House(howie, griswold))\nforall x (House(x, christof) and Peptise(x, griswold) -> Vesicate(griswold, christof))\n\nnot Physical(christof)\n\nPeptise(christof, griswold) and forall x (Peptise(x, griswold) -> Physical(x)) -> therefore Physical(christof)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The adnan ossify the shirley. The adnan is skanky. The adnan is bivalent. The trent ossify the adnan. The trent ossify the shirley. The trent is rotatable. The trent is bivalent. The trent overvalue the shirley. The shirley ossify the adnan. The shirley ossify the trent. The shirley is rotatable. The shirley is bivalent. The shirley is flinty. The shirley is heavenly. The shirley vitiate the adnan. If something ossify the shirley then it is heavenly. If something ossify the trent and it vitiate the shirley then the shirley vitiate the trent. If something is rotatable and it overvalue the trent then the trent ossify the shirley. If something is heavenly then it ossify the trent. If something overvalue the adnan then the adnan ossify the shirley. If something overvalue the shirley and it ossify the trent then the trent overvalue the adnan. If something vitiate the shirley and the shirley vitiate the trent then the trent vitiate the shirley. If something vitiate the adnan and it ossify the shirley then the shirley overvalue the adnan. The adnan ossify the trent.", "logic": "\nOssify(adnan, shirley)\nSkanky(adnan)\nBivalent(adnan)\nOssify(trent, adnan)\nOssify(trent, shirley)\nRotatable(trent)\nBivalent(trent)\nOvervalue(trent, shirley)\nOssify(shirley, adnan)\nOssify(shirley, trent)\nRotatable(shirley)\nBivalent(shirley)\nFlinty(shirley)\nHeavenly(shirley)\nVitiate(shirley, adnan)\nforall x (Ossify(x, shirley) -> Heavenly(x))\nforall x (Ossify(x, trent) and Vitiate(x, shirley) -> Vitiate(shirley, trent))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and Overvalue(x, trent) -> Ossify(trent, shirley))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) -> Ossify(x, trent))\nforall x (Overvalue(x, adnan) -> Ossify(adnan, shirley))\nforall x (Overvalue(x, shirley) and Ossify(x, trent) -> Overvalue(trent, adnan))\nforall x (Vitiate(x, shirley) and Vitiate(shirley, trent) -> Vitiate(trent, shirley))\nforall x (Vitiate(x, adnan) and Ossify(x, shirley) -> Overvalue(shirley, adnan))\n\nOssify(adnan, trent)\n\nOssify(adnan, shirley) and forall x (Ossify(x, shirley) -> Heavenly(x)) -> therefore Heavenly(adnan) Heavenly(adnan) and forall x (Heavenly(x) -> Ossify(x, trent)) -> therefore Ossify(adnan, trent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The jobey piss the dorothee. The jobey is dishonored. The jobey is tomentous. The karil piss the jobey. The karil piss the dorothee. The karil is majestic. The karil is tomentous. The karil disembowel the dorothee. The dorothee piss the jobey. The dorothee piss the karil. The dorothee is majestic. The dorothee is tomentous. The dorothee is ghastly. The dorothee is computable. The dorothee psalm the jobey. If something piss the dorothee then it is computable. If something piss the karil and it psalm the dorothee then the dorothee psalm the karil. If something is majestic and it disembowel the karil then the karil piss the dorothee. If something is computable then it piss the karil. If something disembowel the jobey then the jobey piss the dorothee. If something disembowel the dorothee and it piss the karil then the karil disembowel the jobey. If something psalm the dorothee and the dorothee psalm the karil then the karil psalm the dorothee. If something psalm the jobey and it piss the dorothee then the dorothee disembowel the jobey. The karil does not eat the karil.", "logic": "\nPiss(jobey, dorothee)\nDishonored(jobey)\nTomentous(jobey)\nPiss(karil, jobey)\nPiss(karil, dorothee)\nMajestic(karil)\nTomentous(karil)\nDisembowel(karil, dorothee)\nPiss(dorothee, jobey)\nPiss(dorothee, karil)\nMajestic(dorothee)\nTomentous(dorothee)\nGhastly(dorothee)\nComputable(dorothee)\nPsalm(dorothee, jobey)\nforall x (Piss(x, dorothee) -> Computable(x))\nforall x (Piss(x, karil) and Psalm(x, dorothee) -> Psalm(dorothee, karil))\nforall x (Majestic(x) and Disembowel(x, karil) -> Piss(karil, dorothee))\nforall x (Computable(x) -> Piss(x, karil))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, jobey) -> Piss(jobey, dorothee))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, dorothee) and Piss(x, karil) -> Disembowel(karil, jobey))\nforall x (Psalm(x, dorothee) and Psalm(dorothee, karil) -> Psalm(karil, dorothee))\nforall x (Psalm(x, jobey) and Piss(x, dorothee) -> Disembowel(dorothee, jobey))\n\nnot Piss(karil, karil)\n\nPiss(karil, dorothee) and forall x (Piss(x, dorothee) -> Computable(x)) -> therefore Computable(karil) Computable(karil) and forall x (Computable(x) -> Piss(x, karil)) -> therefore Piss(karil, karil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The marissa blush the blakeley. The marissa is rigorous. The marissa is dogmatical. The neel blush the marissa. The neel blush the blakeley. The neel is planned. The neel is dogmatical. The neel appal the blakeley. The blakeley blush the marissa. The blakeley blush the neel. The blakeley is planned. The blakeley is dogmatical. The blakeley is virgin. The blakeley is heartfelt. The blakeley alkalise the marissa. If something blush the blakeley then it is heartfelt. If something blush the neel and it alkalise the blakeley then the blakeley alkalise the neel. If something is planned and it appal the neel then the neel blush the blakeley. If something is heartfelt then it blush the neel. If something appal the marissa then the marissa blush the blakeley. If something appal the blakeley and it blush the neel then the neel appal the marissa. If something alkalise the blakeley and the blakeley alkalise the neel then the neel alkalise the blakeley. If something alkalise the marissa and it blush the blakeley then the blakeley appal the marissa. The neel does not need the blakeley.", "logic": "\nBlush(marissa, blakeley)\nRigorous(marissa)\nDogmatical(marissa)\nBlush(neel, marissa)\nBlush(neel, blakeley)\nPlanned(neel)\nDogmatical(neel)\nAppal(neel, blakeley)\nBlush(blakeley, marissa)\nBlush(blakeley, neel)\nPlanned(blakeley)\nDogmatical(blakeley)\nVirgin(blakeley)\nHeartfelt(blakeley)\nAlkalise(blakeley, marissa)\nforall x (Blush(x, blakeley) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Blush(x, neel) and Alkalise(x, blakeley) -> Alkalise(blakeley, neel))\nforall x (Planned(x) and Appal(x, neel) -> Blush(neel, blakeley))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) -> Blush(x, neel))\nforall x (Appal(x, marissa) -> Blush(marissa, blakeley))\nforall x (Appal(x, blakeley) and Blush(x, neel) -> Appal(neel, marissa))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, blakeley) and Alkalise(blakeley, neel) -> Alkalise(neel, blakeley))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, marissa) and Blush(x, blakeley) -> Appal(blakeley, marissa))\n\nnot Alkalise(neel, blakeley)\n\nforall x (Alkalise(x, blakeley) and Alkalise(blakeley, neel) -> Alkalise(neel, blakeley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The rebecka abye the mireielle. The rebecka is lacelike. The rebecka is undrained. The mordecai abye the rebecka. The mordecai abye the mireielle. The mordecai is teased. The mordecai is undrained. The mordecai degust the mireielle. The mireielle abye the rebecka. The mireielle abye the mordecai. The mireielle is teased. The mireielle is undrained. The mireielle is partisan. The mireielle is tangy. The mireielle adjure the rebecka. If something abye the mireielle then it is tangy. If something abye the mordecai and it adjure the mireielle then the mireielle adjure the mordecai. If something is teased and it degust the mordecai then the mordecai abye the mireielle. If something is tangy then it abye the mordecai. If something degust the rebecka then the rebecka abye the mireielle. If something degust the mireielle and it abye the mordecai then the mordecai degust the rebecka. If something adjure the mireielle and the mireielle adjure the mordecai then the mordecai adjure the mireielle. If something adjure the rebecka and it abye the mireielle then the mireielle degust the rebecka. The mireielle degust the rebecka.", "logic": "\nAbye(rebecka, mireielle)\nLacelike(rebecka)\nUndrained(rebecka)\nAbye(mordecai, rebecka)\nAbye(mordecai, mireielle)\nTeased(mordecai)\nUndrained(mordecai)\nDegust(mordecai, mireielle)\nAbye(mireielle, rebecka)\nAbye(mireielle, mordecai)\nTeased(mireielle)\nUndrained(mireielle)\nPartisan(mireielle)\nTangy(mireielle)\nAdjure(mireielle, rebecka)\nforall x (Abye(x, mireielle) -> Tangy(x))\nforall x (Abye(x, mordecai) and Adjure(x, mireielle) -> Adjure(mireielle, mordecai))\nforall x (Teased(x) and Degust(x, mordecai) -> Abye(mordecai, mireielle))\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Abye(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Degust(x, rebecka) -> Abye(rebecka, mireielle))\nforall x (Degust(x, mireielle) and Abye(x, mordecai) -> Degust(mordecai, rebecka))\nforall x (Adjure(x, mireielle) and Adjure(mireielle, mordecai) -> Adjure(mordecai, mireielle))\nforall x (Adjure(x, rebecka) and Abye(x, mireielle) -> Degust(mireielle, rebecka))\n\nDegust(mireielle, rebecka)\n\nforall x (Adjure(x, rebecka) and Abye(x, mireielle) -> Degust(mireielle, rebecka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The montague blend the megan. The montague is pharaonic. The montague is glooming. The jefry blend the montague. The jefry blend the megan. The jefry is beastly. The jefry is glooming. The jefry flense the megan. The megan blend the montague. The megan blend the jefry. The megan is beastly. The megan is glooming. The megan is radio. The megan is skinny. The megan quench the montague. If something blend the megan then it is skinny. If something blend the jefry and it quench the megan then the megan quench the jefry. If something is beastly and it flense the jefry then the jefry blend the megan. If something is skinny then it blend the jefry. If something flense the montague then the montague blend the megan. If something flense the megan and it blend the jefry then the jefry flense the montague. If something quench the megan and the megan quench the jefry then the jefry quench the megan. If something quench the montague and it blend the megan then the megan flense the montague. The megan does not need the jefry.", "logic": "\nBlend(montague, megan)\nPharaonic(montague)\nGlooming(montague)\nBlend(jefry, montague)\nBlend(jefry, megan)\nBeastly(jefry)\nGlooming(jefry)\nFlense(jefry, megan)\nBlend(megan, montague)\nBlend(megan, jefry)\nBeastly(megan)\nGlooming(megan)\nRadio(megan)\nSkinny(megan)\nQuench(megan, montague)\nforall x (Blend(x, megan) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Blend(x, jefry) and Quench(x, megan) -> Quench(megan, jefry))\nforall x (Beastly(x) and Flense(x, jefry) -> Blend(jefry, megan))\nforall x (Skinny(x) -> Blend(x, jefry))\nforall x (Flense(x, montague) -> Blend(montague, megan))\nforall x (Flense(x, megan) and Blend(x, jefry) -> Flense(jefry, montague))\nforall x (Quench(x, megan) and Quench(megan, jefry) -> Quench(jefry, megan))\nforall x (Quench(x, montague) and Blend(x, megan) -> Flense(megan, montague))\n\nnot Quench(megan, jefry)\n\nforall x (Blend(x, jefry) and Quench(x, megan) -> Quench(megan, jefry)) <- forall x (Quench(x, megan) and Quench(megan, jefry) -> Quench(jefry, megan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The caritta basset the tonnie. The caritta is stenosed. The caritta is anodic. The paul basset the caritta. The paul basset the tonnie. The paul is webbed. The paul is anodic. The paul hinge the tonnie. The tonnie basset the caritta. The tonnie basset the paul. The tonnie is webbed. The tonnie is anodic. The tonnie is impotent. The tonnie is hidebound. The tonnie depolarize the caritta. If something basset the tonnie then it is hidebound. If something basset the paul and it depolarize the tonnie then the tonnie depolarize the paul. If something is webbed and it hinge the paul then the paul basset the tonnie. If something is hidebound then it basset the paul. If something hinge the caritta then the caritta basset the tonnie. If something hinge the tonnie and it basset the paul then the paul hinge the caritta. If something depolarize the tonnie and the tonnie depolarize the paul then the paul depolarize the tonnie. If something depolarize the caritta and it basset the tonnie then the tonnie hinge the caritta. The paul is stenosed.", "logic": "\nBasset(caritta, tonnie)\nStenosed(caritta)\nAnodic(caritta)\nBasset(paul, caritta)\nBasset(paul, tonnie)\nWebbed(paul)\nAnodic(paul)\nHinge(paul, tonnie)\nBasset(tonnie, caritta)\nBasset(tonnie, paul)\nWebbed(tonnie)\nAnodic(tonnie)\nImpotent(tonnie)\nHidebound(tonnie)\nDepolarize(tonnie, caritta)\nforall x (Basset(x, tonnie) -> Hidebound(x))\nforall x (Basset(x, paul) and Depolarize(x, tonnie) -> Depolarize(tonnie, paul))\nforall x (Webbed(x) and Hinge(x, paul) -> Basset(paul, tonnie))\nforall x (Hidebound(x) -> Basset(x, paul))\nforall x (Hinge(x, caritta) -> Basset(caritta, tonnie))\nforall x (Hinge(x, tonnie) and Basset(x, paul) -> Hinge(paul, caritta))\nforall x (Depolarize(x, tonnie) and Depolarize(tonnie, paul) -> Depolarize(paul, tonnie))\nforall x (Depolarize(x, caritta) and Basset(x, tonnie) -> Hinge(tonnie, caritta))\n\nStenosed(paul)\n\nStenosed(paul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The katy cabbage the pascale. The katy is latish. The katy is calicular. The parnell cabbage the katy. The parnell cabbage the pascale. The parnell is uplifted. The parnell is calicular. The parnell overboil the pascale. The pascale cabbage the katy. The pascale cabbage the parnell. The pascale is uplifted. The pascale is calicular. The pascale is foiled. The pascale is operating. The pascale interleave the katy. If something cabbage the pascale then it is operating. If something cabbage the parnell and it interleave the pascale then the pascale interleave the parnell. If something is uplifted and it overboil the parnell then the parnell cabbage the pascale. If something is operating then it cabbage the parnell. If something overboil the katy then the katy cabbage the pascale. If something overboil the pascale and it cabbage the parnell then the parnell overboil the katy. If something interleave the pascale and the pascale interleave the parnell then the parnell interleave the pascale. If something interleave the katy and it cabbage the pascale then the pascale overboil the katy. The parnell does not need the parnell.", "logic": "\nCabbage(katy, pascale)\nLatish(katy)\nCalicular(katy)\nCabbage(parnell, katy)\nCabbage(parnell, pascale)\nUplifted(parnell)\nCalicular(parnell)\nOverboil(parnell, pascale)\nCabbage(pascale, katy)\nCabbage(pascale, parnell)\nUplifted(pascale)\nCalicular(pascale)\nFoiled(pascale)\nOperating(pascale)\nInterleave(pascale, katy)\nforall x (Cabbage(x, pascale) -> Operating(x))\nforall x (Cabbage(x, parnell) and Interleave(x, pascale) -> Interleave(pascale, parnell))\nforall x (Uplifted(x) and Overboil(x, parnell) -> Cabbage(parnell, pascale))\nforall x (Operating(x) -> Cabbage(x, parnell))\nforall x (Overboil(x, katy) -> Cabbage(katy, pascale))\nforall x (Overboil(x, pascale) and Cabbage(x, parnell) -> Overboil(parnell, katy))\nforall x (Interleave(x, pascale) and Interleave(pascale, parnell) -> Interleave(parnell, pascale))\nforall x (Interleave(x, katy) and Cabbage(x, pascale) -> Overboil(pascale, katy))\n\nnot Interleave(parnell, parnell)\n\nnot Interleave(parnell, parnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The glenine docket the tremayne. The glenine is doctorial. The glenine is rodlike. The dorita docket the glenine. The dorita docket the tremayne. The dorita is adolescent. The dorita is rodlike. The dorita excrete the tremayne. The tremayne docket the glenine. The tremayne docket the dorita. The tremayne is adolescent. The tremayne is rodlike. The tremayne is observed. The tremayne is moderato. The tremayne stink the glenine. If something docket the tremayne then it is moderato. If something docket the dorita and it stink the tremayne then the tremayne stink the dorita. If something is adolescent and it excrete the dorita then the dorita docket the tremayne. If something is moderato then it docket the dorita. If something excrete the glenine then the glenine docket the tremayne. If something excrete the tremayne and it docket the dorita then the dorita excrete the glenine. If something stink the tremayne and the tremayne stink the dorita then the dorita stink the tremayne. If something stink the glenine and it docket the tremayne then the tremayne excrete the glenine. The glenine is observed.", "logic": "\nDocket(glenine, tremayne)\nDoctorial(glenine)\nRodlike(glenine)\nDocket(dorita, glenine)\nDocket(dorita, tremayne)\nAdolescent(dorita)\nRodlike(dorita)\nExcrete(dorita, tremayne)\nDocket(tremayne, glenine)\nDocket(tremayne, dorita)\nAdolescent(tremayne)\nRodlike(tremayne)\nObserved(tremayne)\nModerato(tremayne)\nStink(tremayne, glenine)\nforall x (Docket(x, tremayne) -> Moderato(x))\nforall x (Docket(x, dorita) and Stink(x, tremayne) -> Stink(tremayne, dorita))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) and Excrete(x, dorita) -> Docket(dorita, tremayne))\nforall x (Moderato(x) -> Docket(x, dorita))\nforall x (Excrete(x, glenine) -> Docket(glenine, tremayne))\nforall x (Excrete(x, tremayne) and Docket(x, dorita) -> Excrete(dorita, glenine))\nforall x (Stink(x, tremayne) and Stink(tremayne, dorita) -> Stink(dorita, tremayne))\nforall x (Stink(x, glenine) and Docket(x, tremayne) -> Excrete(tremayne, glenine))\n\nObserved(glenine)\n\nObserved(glenine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-953"} {"premises": "The mahmoud establish the alta. The willa is operative. The willa shriek the mahmoud. The willa establish the alta. The willa establish the johannah. The alta analyse the mahmoud. The alta is seafaring. The alta shriek the mahmoud. The alta establish the willa. The johannah analyse the willa. The johannah analyse the alta. The johannah is seafaring. The johannah is operative. The johannah is groveling. The johannah is rutty. The johannah shriek the alta. If something establish the willa and it analyse the willa then the willa is rutty. If something analyse the johannah and the johannah analyse the willa then it establish the willa. If something shriek the alta then it analyse the johannah. If something establish the alta and it is seafaring then the alta shriek the willa. If something shriek the mahmoud and the mahmoud analyse the willa then the willa analyse the mahmoud. If something is seafaring then it analyse the mahmoud. The mahmoud establish the alta.", "logic": "\nEstablish(mahmoud, alta)\nOperative(willa)\nShriek(willa, mahmoud)\nEstablish(willa, alta)\nEstablish(willa, johannah)\nAnalyse(alta, mahmoud)\nSeafaring(alta)\nShriek(alta, mahmoud)\nEstablish(alta, willa)\nAnalyse(johannah, willa)\nAnalyse(johannah, alta)\nSeafaring(johannah)\nOperative(johannah)\nGroveling(johannah)\nRutty(johannah)\nShriek(johannah, alta)\nforall x (Establish(x, willa) and Analyse(x, willa) -> Rutty(willa))\nforall x (Analyse(x, johannah) and Analyse(johannah, willa) -> Establish(x, willa))\nforall x (Shriek(x, alta) -> Analyse(x, johannah))\nforall x (Establish(x, alta) and Seafaring(x) -> Shriek(alta, willa))\nforall x (Shriek(x, mahmoud) and Analyse(mahmoud, willa) -> Analyse(willa, mahmoud))\nforall x (Seafaring(x) -> Analyse(x, mahmoud))\n\nEstablish(mahmoud, alta)\n\ntherefore Establish(mahmoud, alta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The antony narrate the leonid. The tanya is rotund. The tanya capsulate the antony. The tanya narrate the leonid. The tanya narrate the reggi. The leonid adulterate the antony. The leonid is hilar. The leonid capsulate the antony. The leonid narrate the tanya. The reggi adulterate the tanya. The reggi adulterate the leonid. The reggi is hilar. The reggi is rotund. The reggi is esthetic. The reggi is overjoyed. The reggi capsulate the leonid. If something narrate the tanya and it adulterate the tanya then the tanya is overjoyed. If something adulterate the reggi and the reggi adulterate the tanya then it narrate the tanya. If something capsulate the leonid then it adulterate the reggi. If something narrate the leonid and it is hilar then the leonid capsulate the tanya. If something capsulate the antony and the antony adulterate the tanya then the tanya adulterate the antony. If something is hilar then it adulterate the antony. The reggi does not need the leonid.", "logic": "\nNarrate(antony, leonid)\nRotund(tanya)\nCapsulate(tanya, antony)\nNarrate(tanya, leonid)\nNarrate(tanya, reggi)\nAdulterate(leonid, antony)\nHilar(leonid)\nCapsulate(leonid, antony)\nNarrate(leonid, tanya)\nAdulterate(reggi, tanya)\nAdulterate(reggi, leonid)\nHilar(reggi)\nRotund(reggi)\nEsthetic(reggi)\nOverjoyed(reggi)\nCapsulate(reggi, leonid)\nforall x (Narrate(x, tanya) and Adulterate(x, tanya) -> Overjoyed(tanya))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, reggi) and Adulterate(reggi, tanya) -> Narrate(x, tanya))\nforall x (Capsulate(x, leonid) -> Adulterate(x, reggi))\nforall x (Narrate(x, leonid) and Hilar(x) -> Capsulate(leonid, tanya))\nforall x (Capsulate(x, antony) and Adulterate(antony, tanya) -> Adulterate(tanya, antony))\nforall x (Hilar(x) -> Adulterate(x, antony))\n\nnot Capsulate(reggi, leonid)\n\ntherefore Capsulate(reggi, leonid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The danielle retie the dayna. The darrick is unilateral. The darrick infect the danielle. The darrick retie the dayna. The darrick retie the flossie. The dayna homologise the danielle. The dayna is earnest. The dayna infect the danielle. The dayna retie the darrick. The flossie homologise the darrick. The flossie homologise the dayna. The flossie is earnest. The flossie is unilateral. The flossie is reeking. The flossie is unoriginal. The flossie infect the dayna. If something retie the darrick and it homologise the darrick then the darrick is unoriginal. If something homologise the flossie and the flossie homologise the darrick then it retie the darrick. If something infect the dayna then it homologise the flossie. If something retie the dayna and it is earnest then the dayna infect the darrick. If something infect the danielle and the danielle homologise the darrick then the darrick homologise the danielle. If something is earnest then it homologise the danielle. The flossie homologise the danielle.", "logic": "\nRetie(danielle, dayna)\nUnilateral(darrick)\nInfect(darrick, danielle)\nRetie(darrick, dayna)\nRetie(darrick, flossie)\nHomologise(dayna, danielle)\nEarnest(dayna)\nInfect(dayna, danielle)\nRetie(dayna, darrick)\nHomologise(flossie, darrick)\nHomologise(flossie, dayna)\nEarnest(flossie)\nUnilateral(flossie)\nReeking(flossie)\nUnoriginal(flossie)\nInfect(flossie, dayna)\nforall x (Retie(x, darrick) and Homologise(x, darrick) -> Unoriginal(darrick))\nforall x (Homologise(x, flossie) and Homologise(flossie, darrick) -> Retie(x, darrick))\nforall x (Infect(x, dayna) -> Homologise(x, flossie))\nforall x (Retie(x, dayna) and Earnest(x) -> Infect(dayna, darrick))\nforall x (Infect(x, danielle) and Homologise(danielle, darrick) -> Homologise(darrick, danielle))\nforall x (Earnest(x) -> Homologise(x, danielle))\n\nHomologise(flossie, danielle)\n\nEarnest(flossie) and forall x (Earnest(x) -> Homologise(x, danielle)) -> therefore Homologise(flossie, danielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The tina shrine the dedra. The melina is sulcate. The melina rename the tina. The melina shrine the dedra. The melina shrine the milka. The dedra cruise the tina. The dedra is especial. The dedra rename the tina. The dedra shrine the melina. The milka cruise the melina. The milka cruise the dedra. The milka is especial. The milka is sulcate. The milka is lambent. The milka is brainsick. The milka rename the dedra. If something shrine the melina and it cruise the melina then the melina is brainsick. If something cruise the milka and the milka cruise the melina then it shrine the melina. If something rename the dedra then it cruise the milka. If something shrine the dedra and it is especial then the dedra rename the melina. If something rename the tina and the tina cruise the melina then the melina cruise the tina. If something is especial then it cruise the tina. The milka does not eat the tina.", "logic": "\nShrine(tina, dedra)\nSulcate(melina)\nRename(melina, tina)\nShrine(melina, dedra)\nShrine(melina, milka)\nCruise(dedra, tina)\nEspecial(dedra)\nRename(dedra, tina)\nShrine(dedra, melina)\nCruise(milka, melina)\nCruise(milka, dedra)\nEspecial(milka)\nSulcate(milka)\nLambent(milka)\nBrainsick(milka)\nRename(milka, dedra)\nforall x (Shrine(x, melina) and Cruise(x, melina) -> Brainsick(melina))\nforall x (Cruise(x, milka) and Cruise(milka, melina) -> Shrine(x, melina))\nforall x (Rename(x, dedra) -> Cruise(x, milka))\nforall x (Shrine(x, dedra) and Especial(x) -> Rename(dedra, melina))\nforall x (Rename(x, tina) and Cruise(tina, melina) -> Cruise(melina, tina))\nforall x (Especial(x) -> Cruise(x, tina))\n\nnot Cruise(milka, tina)\n\nEspecial(milka) and forall x (Especial(x) -> Cruise(x, tina)) -> therefore Cruise(milka, tina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The trish sacrifice the josey. The chev is cataclinal. The chev horsewhip the trish. The chev sacrifice the josey. The chev sacrifice the charo. The josey bombinate the trish. The josey is swarthy. The josey horsewhip the trish. The josey sacrifice the chev. The charo bombinate the chev. The charo bombinate the josey. The charo is swarthy. The charo is cataclinal. The charo is leaky. The charo is unoiled. The charo horsewhip the josey. If something sacrifice the chev and it bombinate the chev then the chev is unoiled. If something bombinate the charo and the charo bombinate the chev then it sacrifice the chev. If something horsewhip the josey then it bombinate the charo. If something sacrifice the josey and it is swarthy then the josey horsewhip the chev. If something horsewhip the trish and the trish bombinate the chev then the chev bombinate the trish. If something is swarthy then it bombinate the trish. The charo sacrifice the chev.", "logic": "\nSacrifice(trish, josey)\nCataclinal(chev)\nHorsewhip(chev, trish)\nSacrifice(chev, josey)\nSacrifice(chev, charo)\nBombinate(josey, trish)\nSwarthy(josey)\nHorsewhip(josey, trish)\nSacrifice(josey, chev)\nBombinate(charo, chev)\nBombinate(charo, josey)\nSwarthy(charo)\nCataclinal(charo)\nLeaky(charo)\nUnoiled(charo)\nHorsewhip(charo, josey)\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, chev) and Bombinate(x, chev) -> Unoiled(chev))\nforall x (Bombinate(x, charo) and Bombinate(charo, chev) -> Sacrifice(x, chev))\nforall x (Horsewhip(x, josey) -> Bombinate(x, charo))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, josey) and Swarthy(x) -> Horsewhip(josey, chev))\nforall x (Horsewhip(x, trish) and Bombinate(trish, chev) -> Bombinate(chev, trish))\nforall x (Swarthy(x) -> Bombinate(x, trish))\n\nSacrifice(charo, chev)\n\nHorsewhip(charo, josey) and forall x (Horsewhip(x, josey) -> Bombinate(x, charo)) -> therefore Bombinate(charo, charo) Bombinate(charo, charo) and Bombinate(charo, chev) and forall x (Bombinate(x, charo) and Bombinate(charo, chev) -> Sacrifice(x, chev)) -> therefore Sacrifice(charo, chev)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The josepha exult the gleda. The rosalinda is irruptive. The rosalinda better the josepha. The rosalinda exult the gleda. The rosalinda exult the tanya. The gleda suggest the josepha. The gleda is mendelian. The gleda better the josepha. The gleda exult the rosalinda. The tanya suggest the rosalinda. The tanya suggest the gleda. The tanya is mendelian. The tanya is irruptive. The tanya is unnerved. The tanya is dramatic. The tanya better the gleda. If something exult the rosalinda and it suggest the rosalinda then the rosalinda is dramatic. If something suggest the tanya and the tanya suggest the rosalinda then it exult the rosalinda. If something better the gleda then it suggest the tanya. If something exult the gleda and it is mendelian then the gleda better the rosalinda. If something better the josepha and the josepha suggest the rosalinda then the rosalinda suggest the josepha. If something is mendelian then it suggest the josepha. The tanya does not visit the rosalinda.", "logic": "\nExult(josepha, gleda)\nIrruptive(rosalinda)\nBetter(rosalinda, josepha)\nExult(rosalinda, gleda)\nExult(rosalinda, tanya)\nSuggest(gleda, josepha)\nMendelian(gleda)\nBetter(gleda, josepha)\nExult(gleda, rosalinda)\nSuggest(tanya, rosalinda)\nSuggest(tanya, gleda)\nMendelian(tanya)\nIrruptive(tanya)\nUnnerved(tanya)\nDramatic(tanya)\nBetter(tanya, gleda)\nforall x (Exult(x, rosalinda) and Suggest(x, rosalinda) -> Dramatic(rosalinda))\nforall x (Suggest(x, tanya) and Suggest(tanya, rosalinda) -> Exult(x, rosalinda))\nforall x (Better(x, gleda) -> Suggest(x, tanya))\nforall x (Exult(x, gleda) and Mendelian(x) -> Better(gleda, rosalinda))\nforall x (Better(x, josepha) and Suggest(josepha, rosalinda) -> Suggest(rosalinda, josepha))\nforall x (Mendelian(x) -> Suggest(x, josepha))\n\nnot Exult(tanya, rosalinda)\n\nBetter(tanya, gleda) and forall x (Better(x, gleda) -> Suggest(x, tanya)) -> therefore Suggest(tanya, tanya) Suggest(tanya, tanya) and Suggest(tanya, rosalinda) and forall x (Suggest(x, tanya) and Suggest(tanya, rosalinda) -> Exult(x, rosalinda)) -> therefore Exult(tanya, rosalinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The isaac harp the fina. The erwin is attacking. The erwin coconspire the isaac. The erwin harp the fina. The erwin harp the lorenzo. The fina stitch the isaac. The fina is razed. The fina coconspire the isaac. The fina harp the erwin. The lorenzo stitch the erwin. The lorenzo stitch the fina. The lorenzo is razed. The lorenzo is attacking. The lorenzo is lugubrious. The lorenzo is avocado. The lorenzo coconspire the fina. If something harp the erwin and it stitch the erwin then the erwin is avocado. If something stitch the lorenzo and the lorenzo stitch the erwin then it harp the erwin. If something coconspire the fina then it stitch the lorenzo. If something harp the fina and it is razed then the fina coconspire the erwin. If something coconspire the isaac and the isaac stitch the erwin then the erwin stitch the isaac. If something is razed then it stitch the isaac. The fina does not need the erwin.", "logic": "\nHarp(isaac, fina)\nAttacking(erwin)\nCoconspire(erwin, isaac)\nHarp(erwin, fina)\nHarp(erwin, lorenzo)\nStitch(fina, isaac)\nRazed(fina)\nCoconspire(fina, isaac)\nHarp(fina, erwin)\nStitch(lorenzo, erwin)\nStitch(lorenzo, fina)\nRazed(lorenzo)\nAttacking(lorenzo)\nLugubrious(lorenzo)\nAvocado(lorenzo)\nCoconspire(lorenzo, fina)\nforall x (Harp(x, erwin) and Stitch(x, erwin) -> Avocado(erwin))\nforall x (Stitch(x, lorenzo) and Stitch(lorenzo, erwin) -> Harp(x, erwin))\nforall x (Coconspire(x, fina) -> Stitch(x, lorenzo))\nforall x (Harp(x, fina) and Razed(x) -> Coconspire(fina, erwin))\nforall x (Coconspire(x, isaac) and Stitch(isaac, erwin) -> Stitch(erwin, isaac))\nforall x (Razed(x) -> Stitch(x, isaac))\n\nnot Coconspire(fina, erwin)\n\nforall x (Harp(x, fina) and Razed(x) -> Coconspire(fina, erwin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The bryana aluminise the joselyn. The celene is collect. The celene unpick the bryana. The celene aluminise the joselyn. The celene aluminise the neely. The joselyn laud the bryana. The joselyn is sororal. The joselyn unpick the bryana. The joselyn aluminise the celene. The neely laud the celene. The neely laud the joselyn. The neely is sororal. The neely is collect. The neely is renunciant. The neely is argentic. The neely unpick the joselyn. If something aluminise the celene and it laud the celene then the celene is argentic. If something laud the neely and the neely laud the celene then it aluminise the celene. If something unpick the joselyn then it laud the neely. If something aluminise the joselyn and it is sororal then the joselyn unpick the celene. If something unpick the bryana and the bryana laud the celene then the celene laud the bryana. If something is sororal then it laud the bryana. The bryana laud the bryana.", "logic": "\nAluminise(bryana, joselyn)\nCollect(celene)\nUnpick(celene, bryana)\nAluminise(celene, joselyn)\nAluminise(celene, neely)\nLaud(joselyn, bryana)\nSororal(joselyn)\nUnpick(joselyn, bryana)\nAluminise(joselyn, celene)\nLaud(neely, celene)\nLaud(neely, joselyn)\nSororal(neely)\nCollect(neely)\nRenunciant(neely)\nArgentic(neely)\nUnpick(neely, joselyn)\nforall x (Aluminise(x, celene) and Laud(x, celene) -> Argentic(celene))\nforall x (Laud(x, neely) and Laud(neely, celene) -> Aluminise(x, celene))\nforall x (Unpick(x, joselyn) -> Laud(x, neely))\nforall x (Aluminise(x, joselyn) and Sororal(x) -> Unpick(joselyn, celene))\nforall x (Unpick(x, bryana) and Laud(bryana, celene) -> Laud(celene, bryana))\nforall x (Sororal(x) -> Laud(x, bryana))\n\nLaud(bryana, bryana)\n\nforall x (Sororal(x) -> Laud(x, bryana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The tonnie simplify the emiline. The terrence is mutual. The terrence barrel the tonnie. The terrence simplify the emiline. The terrence simplify the dom. The emiline stand the tonnie. The emiline is seagirt. The emiline barrel the tonnie. The emiline simplify the terrence. The dom stand the terrence. The dom stand the emiline. The dom is seagirt. The dom is mutual. The dom is patented. The dom is momentary. The dom barrel the emiline. If something simplify the terrence and it stand the terrence then the terrence is momentary. If something stand the dom and the dom stand the terrence then it simplify the terrence. If something barrel the emiline then it stand the dom. If something simplify the emiline and it is seagirt then the emiline barrel the terrence. If something barrel the tonnie and the tonnie stand the terrence then the terrence stand the tonnie. If something is seagirt then it stand the tonnie. The terrence does not eat the dom.", "logic": "\nSimplify(tonnie, emiline)\nMutual(terrence)\nBarrel(terrence, tonnie)\nSimplify(terrence, emiline)\nSimplify(terrence, dom)\nStand(emiline, tonnie)\nSeagirt(emiline)\nBarrel(emiline, tonnie)\nSimplify(emiline, terrence)\nStand(dom, terrence)\nStand(dom, emiline)\nSeagirt(dom)\nMutual(dom)\nPatented(dom)\nMomentary(dom)\nBarrel(dom, emiline)\nforall x (Simplify(x, terrence) and Stand(x, terrence) -> Momentary(terrence))\nforall x (Stand(x, dom) and Stand(dom, terrence) -> Simplify(x, terrence))\nforall x (Barrel(x, emiline) -> Stand(x, dom))\nforall x (Simplify(x, emiline) and Seagirt(x) -> Barrel(emiline, terrence))\nforall x (Barrel(x, tonnie) and Stand(tonnie, terrence) -> Stand(terrence, tonnie))\nforall x (Seagirt(x) -> Stand(x, tonnie))\n\nnot Stand(terrence, dom)\n\nforall x (Barrel(x, emiline) -> Stand(x, dom)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The paige gossip the eleni. The derrick is silent. The derrick abate the paige. The derrick gossip the eleni. The derrick gossip the marchall. The eleni cantilever the paige. The eleni is autogenous. The eleni abate the paige. The eleni gossip the derrick. The marchall cantilever the derrick. The marchall cantilever the eleni. The marchall is autogenous. The marchall is silent. The marchall is cultivable. The marchall is lame. The marchall abate the eleni. If something gossip the derrick and it cantilever the derrick then the derrick is lame. If something cantilever the marchall and the marchall cantilever the derrick then it gossip the derrick. If something abate the eleni then it cantilever the marchall. If something gossip the eleni and it is autogenous then the eleni abate the derrick. If something abate the paige and the paige cantilever the derrick then the derrick cantilever the paige. If something is autogenous then it cantilever the paige. The eleni abate the eleni.", "logic": "\nGossip(paige, eleni)\nSilent(derrick)\nAbate(derrick, paige)\nGossip(derrick, eleni)\nGossip(derrick, marchall)\nCantilever(eleni, paige)\nAutogenous(eleni)\nAbate(eleni, paige)\nGossip(eleni, derrick)\nCantilever(marchall, derrick)\nCantilever(marchall, eleni)\nAutogenous(marchall)\nSilent(marchall)\nCultivable(marchall)\nLame(marchall)\nAbate(marchall, eleni)\nforall x (Gossip(x, derrick) and Cantilever(x, derrick) -> Lame(derrick))\nforall x (Cantilever(x, marchall) and Cantilever(marchall, derrick) -> Gossip(x, derrick))\nforall x (Abate(x, eleni) -> Cantilever(x, marchall))\nforall x (Gossip(x, eleni) and Autogenous(x) -> Abate(eleni, derrick))\nforall x (Abate(x, paige) and Cantilever(paige, derrick) -> Cantilever(derrick, paige))\nforall x (Autogenous(x) -> Cantilever(x, paige))\n\nAbate(eleni, eleni)\n\nAbate(eleni, eleni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The iolande champion the maryellen. The bennet is impacted. The bennet resemble the iolande. The bennet champion the maryellen. The bennet champion the davita. The maryellen tomahawk the iolande. The maryellen is overhasty. The maryellen resemble the iolande. The maryellen champion the bennet. The davita tomahawk the bennet. The davita tomahawk the maryellen. The davita is overhasty. The davita is impacted. The davita is vile. The davita is amort. The davita resemble the maryellen. If something champion the bennet and it tomahawk the bennet then the bennet is amort. If something tomahawk the davita and the davita tomahawk the bennet then it champion the bennet. If something resemble the maryellen then it tomahawk the davita. If something champion the maryellen and it is overhasty then the maryellen resemble the bennet. If something resemble the iolande and the iolande tomahawk the bennet then the bennet tomahawk the iolande. If something is overhasty then it tomahawk the iolande. The iolande does not eat the bennet.", "logic": "\nChampion(iolande, maryellen)\nImpacted(bennet)\nResemble(bennet, iolande)\nChampion(bennet, maryellen)\nChampion(bennet, davita)\nTomahawk(maryellen, iolande)\nOverhasty(maryellen)\nResemble(maryellen, iolande)\nChampion(maryellen, bennet)\nTomahawk(davita, bennet)\nTomahawk(davita, maryellen)\nOverhasty(davita)\nImpacted(davita)\nVile(davita)\nAmort(davita)\nResemble(davita, maryellen)\nforall x (Champion(x, bennet) and Tomahawk(x, bennet) -> Amort(bennet))\nforall x (Tomahawk(x, davita) and Tomahawk(davita, bennet) -> Champion(x, bennet))\nforall x (Resemble(x, maryellen) -> Tomahawk(x, davita))\nforall x (Champion(x, maryellen) and Overhasty(x) -> Resemble(maryellen, bennet))\nforall x (Resemble(x, iolande) and Tomahawk(iolande, bennet) -> Tomahawk(bennet, iolande))\nforall x (Overhasty(x) -> Tomahawk(x, iolande))\n\nnot Tomahawk(iolande, bennet)\n\nnot Tomahawk(iolande, bennet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The fritz drown the kriste. The ronna is ternary. The ronna grovel the fritz. The ronna drown the kriste. The ronna drown the flori. The kriste inure the fritz. The kriste is entitled. The kriste grovel the fritz. The kriste drown the ronna. The flori inure the ronna. The flori inure the kriste. The flori is entitled. The flori is ternary. The flori is coincident. The flori is goosy. The flori grovel the kriste. If something drown the ronna and it inure the ronna then the ronna is goosy. If something inure the flori and the flori inure the ronna then it drown the ronna. If something grovel the kriste then it inure the flori. If something drown the kriste and it is entitled then the kriste grovel the ronna. If something grovel the fritz and the fritz inure the ronna then the ronna inure the fritz. If something is entitled then it inure the fritz. The ronna is coincident.", "logic": "\nDrown(fritz, kriste)\nTernary(ronna)\nGrovel(ronna, fritz)\nDrown(ronna, kriste)\nDrown(ronna, flori)\nInure(kriste, fritz)\nEntitled(kriste)\nGrovel(kriste, fritz)\nDrown(kriste, ronna)\nInure(flori, ronna)\nInure(flori, kriste)\nEntitled(flori)\nTernary(flori)\nCoincident(flori)\nGoosy(flori)\nGrovel(flori, kriste)\nforall x (Drown(x, ronna) and Inure(x, ronna) -> Goosy(ronna))\nforall x (Inure(x, flori) and Inure(flori, ronna) -> Drown(x, ronna))\nforall x (Grovel(x, kriste) -> Inure(x, flori))\nforall x (Drown(x, kriste) and Entitled(x) -> Grovel(kriste, ronna))\nforall x (Grovel(x, fritz) and Inure(fritz, ronna) -> Inure(ronna, fritz))\nforall x (Entitled(x) -> Inure(x, fritz))\n\nCoincident(ronna)\n\nCoincident(ronna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The vitoria plane the belva. The ephrayim is consecrate. The ephrayim is cosmic. The ephrayim is aortic. The ephrayim litter the vitoria. The ephrayim plane the ekaterina. The ekaterina upheave the vitoria. The ekaterina upheave the belva. The ekaterina litter the ephrayim. The ekaterina plane the vitoria. The ekaterina plane the ephrayim. The ekaterina plane the belva. The belva upheave the ephrayim. The belva is cosmic. The belva litter the ephrayim. The belva litter the ekaterina. If something is found and it litter the ephrayim then it plane the belva. If something plane the ekaterina and the ekaterina upheave the ephrayim then the ekaterina upheave the vitoria. If something upheave the ephrayim and the ephrayim is aortic then it is found. The belva is cosmic.", "logic": "\nPlane(vitoria, belva)\nConsecrate(ephrayim)\nCosmic(ephrayim)\nAortic(ephrayim)\nLitter(ephrayim, vitoria)\nPlane(ephrayim, ekaterina)\nUpheave(ekaterina, vitoria)\nUpheave(ekaterina, belva)\nLitter(ekaterina, ephrayim)\nPlane(ekaterina, vitoria)\nPlane(ekaterina, ephrayim)\nPlane(ekaterina, belva)\nUpheave(belva, ephrayim)\nCosmic(belva)\nLitter(belva, ephrayim)\nLitter(belva, ekaterina)\nforall x (Found(x) and Litter(x, ephrayim) -> Plane(x, belva))\nforall x (Plane(x, ekaterina) and Upheave(ekaterina, ephrayim) -> Upheave(ekaterina, vitoria))\nforall x (Upheave(x, ephrayim) and Aortic(ephrayim) -> Found(x))\n\nCosmic(belva)\n\ntherefore Cosmic(belva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The shalne wedel the delphine. The carla is anorexic. The carla is horrid. The carla is comforting. The carla tinkle the shalne. The carla wedel the esme. The esme adduct the shalne. The esme adduct the delphine. The esme tinkle the carla. The esme wedel the shalne. The esme wedel the carla. The esme wedel the delphine. The delphine adduct the carla. The delphine is horrid. The delphine tinkle the carla. The delphine tinkle the esme. If something is blameless and it tinkle the carla then it wedel the delphine. If something wedel the esme and the esme adduct the carla then the esme adduct the shalne. If something adduct the carla and the carla is comforting then it is blameless. The carla does not like the shalne.", "logic": "\nWedel(shalne, delphine)\nAnorexic(carla)\nHorrid(carla)\nComforting(carla)\nTinkle(carla, shalne)\nWedel(carla, esme)\nAdduct(esme, shalne)\nAdduct(esme, delphine)\nTinkle(esme, carla)\nWedel(esme, shalne)\nWedel(esme, carla)\nWedel(esme, delphine)\nAdduct(delphine, carla)\nHorrid(delphine)\nTinkle(delphine, carla)\nTinkle(delphine, esme)\nforall x (Blameless(x) and Tinkle(x, carla) -> Wedel(x, delphine))\nforall x (Wedel(x, esme) and Adduct(esme, carla) -> Adduct(esme, shalne))\nforall x (Adduct(x, carla) and Comforting(carla) -> Blameless(x))\n\nnot Tinkle(carla, shalne)\n\ntherefore Tinkle(carla, shalne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The byram debate the taite. The thacher is extraneous. The thacher is unroofed. The thacher is nugatory. The thacher deoxidize the byram. The thacher debate the ephraim. The ephraim channelise the byram. The ephraim channelise the taite. The ephraim deoxidize the thacher. The ephraim debate the byram. The ephraim debate the thacher. The ephraim debate the taite. The taite channelise the thacher. The taite is unroofed. The taite deoxidize the thacher. The taite deoxidize the ephraim. If something is elicited and it deoxidize the thacher then it debate the taite. If something debate the ephraim and the ephraim channelise the thacher then the ephraim channelise the byram. If something channelise the thacher and the thacher is nugatory then it is elicited. The taite is elicited.", "logic": "\nDebate(byram, taite)\nExtraneous(thacher)\nUnroofed(thacher)\nNugatory(thacher)\nDeoxidize(thacher, byram)\nDebate(thacher, ephraim)\nChannelise(ephraim, byram)\nChannelise(ephraim, taite)\nDeoxidize(ephraim, thacher)\nDebate(ephraim, byram)\nDebate(ephraim, thacher)\nDebate(ephraim, taite)\nChannelise(taite, thacher)\nUnroofed(taite)\nDeoxidize(taite, thacher)\nDeoxidize(taite, ephraim)\nforall x (Elicited(x) and Deoxidize(x, thacher) -> Debate(x, taite))\nforall x (Debate(x, ephraim) and Channelise(ephraim, thacher) -> Channelise(ephraim, byram))\nforall x (Channelise(x, thacher) and Nugatory(thacher) -> Elicited(x))\n\nElicited(taite)\n\nChannelise(taite, thacher) and Nugatory(thacher) and forall x (Channelise(x, thacher) and Nugatory(thacher) -> Elicited(x)) -> therefore Elicited(taite)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The merrill pomade the dickey. The dacey is besotted. The dacey is bauxitic. The dacey is sanitised. The dacey effeminize the merrill. The dacey pomade the will. The will destruct the merrill. The will destruct the dickey. The will effeminize the dacey. The will pomade the merrill. The will pomade the dacey. The will pomade the dickey. The dickey destruct the dacey. The dickey is bauxitic. The dickey effeminize the dacey. The dickey effeminize the will. If something is eldest and it effeminize the dacey then it pomade the dickey. If something pomade the will and the will destruct the dacey then the will destruct the merrill. If something destruct the dacey and the dacey is sanitised then it is eldest. The dickey is not eldest.", "logic": "\nPomade(merrill, dickey)\nBesotted(dacey)\nBauxitic(dacey)\nSanitised(dacey)\nEffeminize(dacey, merrill)\nPomade(dacey, will)\nDestruct(will, merrill)\nDestruct(will, dickey)\nEffeminize(will, dacey)\nPomade(will, merrill)\nPomade(will, dacey)\nPomade(will, dickey)\nDestruct(dickey, dacey)\nBauxitic(dickey)\nEffeminize(dickey, dacey)\nEffeminize(dickey, will)\nforall x (Eldest(x) and Effeminize(x, dacey) -> Pomade(x, dickey))\nforall x (Pomade(x, will) and Destruct(will, dacey) -> Destruct(will, merrill))\nforall x (Destruct(x, dacey) and Sanitised(dacey) -> Eldest(x))\n\nnot Eldest(dickey)\n\nDestruct(dickey, dacey) and Sanitised(dacey) and forall x (Destruct(x, dacey) and Sanitised(dacey) -> Eldest(x)) -> therefore Eldest(dickey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The carolyn powderise the inga. The ileane is puffed. The ileane is ploughed. The ileane is snaky. The ileane pacify the carolyn. The ileane powderise the lisetta. The lisetta outfox the carolyn. The lisetta outfox the inga. The lisetta pacify the ileane. The lisetta powderise the carolyn. The lisetta powderise the ileane. The lisetta powderise the inga. The inga outfox the ileane. The inga is ploughed. The inga pacify the ileane. The inga pacify the lisetta. If something is laboring and it pacify the ileane then it powderise the inga. If something powderise the lisetta and the lisetta outfox the ileane then the lisetta outfox the carolyn. If something outfox the ileane and the ileane is snaky then it is laboring. The inga powderise the inga.", "logic": "\nPowderise(carolyn, inga)\nPuffed(ileane)\nPloughed(ileane)\nSnaky(ileane)\nPacify(ileane, carolyn)\nPowderise(ileane, lisetta)\nOutfox(lisetta, carolyn)\nOutfox(lisetta, inga)\nPacify(lisetta, ileane)\nPowderise(lisetta, carolyn)\nPowderise(lisetta, ileane)\nPowderise(lisetta, inga)\nOutfox(inga, ileane)\nPloughed(inga)\nPacify(inga, ileane)\nPacify(inga, lisetta)\nforall x (Laboring(x) and Pacify(x, ileane) -> Powderise(x, inga))\nforall x (Powderise(x, lisetta) and Outfox(lisetta, ileane) -> Outfox(lisetta, carolyn))\nforall x (Outfox(x, ileane) and Snaky(ileane) -> Laboring(x))\n\nPowderise(inga, inga)\n\nOutfox(inga, ileane) and Snaky(ileane) and forall x (Outfox(x, ileane) and Snaky(ileane) -> Laboring(x)) -> therefore Laboring(inga) Laboring(inga) and Pacify(inga, ileane) and forall x (Laboring(x) and Pacify(x, ileane) -> Powderise(x, inga)) -> therefore Powderise(inga, inga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The kippie glitter the ninetta. The coretta is fascist. The coretta is magnified. The coretta is privileged. The coretta state the kippie. The coretta glitter the anabelle. The anabelle narrow the kippie. The anabelle narrow the ninetta. The anabelle state the coretta. The anabelle glitter the kippie. The anabelle glitter the coretta. The anabelle glitter the ninetta. The ninetta narrow the coretta. The ninetta is magnified. The ninetta state the coretta. The ninetta state the anabelle. If something is shodden and it state the coretta then it glitter the ninetta. If something glitter the anabelle and the anabelle narrow the coretta then the anabelle narrow the kippie. If something narrow the coretta and the coretta is privileged then it is shodden. The ninetta does not see the ninetta.", "logic": "\nGlitter(kippie, ninetta)\nFascist(coretta)\nMagnified(coretta)\nPrivileged(coretta)\nState(coretta, kippie)\nGlitter(coretta, anabelle)\nNarrow(anabelle, kippie)\nNarrow(anabelle, ninetta)\nState(anabelle, coretta)\nGlitter(anabelle, kippie)\nGlitter(anabelle, coretta)\nGlitter(anabelle, ninetta)\nNarrow(ninetta, coretta)\nMagnified(ninetta)\nState(ninetta, coretta)\nState(ninetta, anabelle)\nforall x (Shodden(x) and State(x, coretta) -> Glitter(x, ninetta))\nforall x (Glitter(x, anabelle) and Narrow(anabelle, coretta) -> Narrow(anabelle, kippie))\nforall x (Narrow(x, coretta) and Privileged(coretta) -> Shodden(x))\n\nnot Glitter(ninetta, ninetta)\n\nNarrow(ninetta, coretta) and Privileged(coretta) and forall x (Narrow(x, coretta) and Privileged(coretta) -> Shodden(x)) -> therefore Shodden(ninetta) Shodden(ninetta) and State(ninetta, coretta) and forall x (Shodden(x) and State(x, coretta) -> Glitter(x, ninetta)) -> therefore Glitter(ninetta, ninetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The gertrudis conk the vite. The vitia is dysphoric. The vitia is metalloid. The vitia is westside. The vitia scoop the gertrudis. The vitia conk the meridith. The meridith wager the gertrudis. The meridith wager the vite. The meridith scoop the vitia. The meridith conk the gertrudis. The meridith conk the vitia. The meridith conk the vite. The vite wager the vitia. The vite is metalloid. The vite scoop the vitia. The vite scoop the meridith. If something is unpitying and it scoop the vitia then it conk the vite. If something conk the meridith and the meridith wager the vitia then the meridith wager the gertrudis. If something wager the vitia and the vitia is westside then it is unpitying. The vitia is not unpitying.", "logic": "\nConk(gertrudis, vite)\nDysphoric(vitia)\nMetalloid(vitia)\nWestside(vitia)\nScoop(vitia, gertrudis)\nConk(vitia, meridith)\nWager(meridith, gertrudis)\nWager(meridith, vite)\nScoop(meridith, vitia)\nConk(meridith, gertrudis)\nConk(meridith, vitia)\nConk(meridith, vite)\nWager(vite, vitia)\nMetalloid(vite)\nScoop(vite, vitia)\nScoop(vite, meridith)\nforall x (Unpitying(x) and Scoop(x, vitia) -> Conk(x, vite))\nforall x (Conk(x, meridith) and Wager(meridith, vitia) -> Wager(meridith, gertrudis))\nforall x (Wager(x, vitia) and Westside(vitia) -> Unpitying(x))\n\nnot Unpitying(vitia)\n\nforall x (Wager(x, vitia) and Westside(vitia) -> Unpitying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The viviana whirl the micheal. The lysandra is conserved. The lysandra is indocile. The lysandra is cabalistic. The lysandra stun the viviana. The lysandra whirl the joye. The joye untie the viviana. The joye untie the micheal. The joye stun the lysandra. The joye whirl the viviana. The joye whirl the lysandra. The joye whirl the micheal. The micheal untie the lysandra. The micheal is indocile. The micheal stun the lysandra. The micheal stun the joye. If something is sham and it stun the lysandra then it whirl the micheal. If something whirl the joye and the joye untie the lysandra then the joye untie the viviana. If something untie the lysandra and the lysandra is cabalistic then it is sham. The lysandra whirl the micheal.", "logic": "\nWhirl(viviana, micheal)\nConserved(lysandra)\nIndocile(lysandra)\nCabalistic(lysandra)\nStun(lysandra, viviana)\nWhirl(lysandra, joye)\nUntie(joye, viviana)\nUntie(joye, micheal)\nStun(joye, lysandra)\nWhirl(joye, viviana)\nWhirl(joye, lysandra)\nWhirl(joye, micheal)\nUntie(micheal, lysandra)\nIndocile(micheal)\nStun(micheal, lysandra)\nStun(micheal, joye)\nforall x (Sham(x) and Stun(x, lysandra) -> Whirl(x, micheal))\nforall x (Whirl(x, joye) and Untie(joye, lysandra) -> Untie(joye, viviana))\nforall x (Untie(x, lysandra) and Cabalistic(lysandra) -> Sham(x))\n\nWhirl(lysandra, micheal)\n\nforall x (Sham(x) and Stun(x, lysandra) -> Whirl(x, micheal)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The joly decussate the lacee. The godfree is serologic. The godfree is ablaze. The godfree is papillate. The godfree edge the joly. The godfree decussate the noe. The noe centre the joly. The noe centre the lacee. The noe edge the godfree. The noe decussate the joly. The noe decussate the godfree. The noe decussate the lacee. The lacee centre the godfree. The lacee is ablaze. The lacee edge the godfree. The lacee edge the noe. If something is racy and it edge the godfree then it decussate the lacee. If something decussate the noe and the noe centre the godfree then the noe centre the joly. If something centre the godfree and the godfree is papillate then it is racy. The noe is not racy.", "logic": "\nDecussate(joly, lacee)\nSerologic(godfree)\nAblaze(godfree)\nPapillate(godfree)\nEdge(godfree, joly)\nDecussate(godfree, noe)\nCentre(noe, joly)\nCentre(noe, lacee)\nEdge(noe, godfree)\nDecussate(noe, joly)\nDecussate(noe, godfree)\nDecussate(noe, lacee)\nCentre(lacee, godfree)\nAblaze(lacee)\nEdge(lacee, godfree)\nEdge(lacee, noe)\nforall x (Racy(x) and Edge(x, godfree) -> Decussate(x, lacee))\nforall x (Decussate(x, noe) and Centre(noe, godfree) -> Centre(noe, joly))\nforall x (Centre(x, godfree) and Papillate(godfree) -> Racy(x))\n\nnot Racy(noe)\n\nforall x (Centre(x, godfree) and Papillate(godfree) -> Racy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The braden ruggedize the analiese. The ford is gabonese. The ford is mercuric. The ford is lavish. The ford hurl the braden. The ford ruggedize the christin. The christin husk the braden. The christin husk the analiese. The christin hurl the ford. The christin ruggedize the braden. The christin ruggedize the ford. The christin ruggedize the analiese. The analiese husk the ford. The analiese is mercuric. The analiese hurl the ford. The analiese hurl the christin. If something is churchly and it hurl the ford then it ruggedize the analiese. If something ruggedize the christin and the christin husk the ford then the christin husk the braden. If something husk the ford and the ford is lavish then it is churchly. The ford is kind.", "logic": "\nRuggedize(braden, analiese)\nGabonese(ford)\nMercuric(ford)\nLavish(ford)\nHurl(ford, braden)\nRuggedize(ford, christin)\nHusk(christin, braden)\nHusk(christin, analiese)\nHurl(christin, ford)\nRuggedize(christin, braden)\nRuggedize(christin, ford)\nRuggedize(christin, analiese)\nHusk(analiese, ford)\nMercuric(analiese)\nHurl(analiese, ford)\nHurl(analiese, christin)\nforall x (Churchly(x) and Hurl(x, ford) -> Ruggedize(x, analiese))\nforall x (Ruggedize(x, christin) and Husk(christin, ford) -> Husk(christin, braden))\nforall x (Husk(x, ford) and Lavish(ford) -> Churchly(x))\n\nKind(ford)\n\nKind(ford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The letty abjure the malanie. The morrie is manorial. The morrie is primaeval. The morrie is quaternate. The morrie prick the letty. The morrie abjure the onida. The onida respite the letty. The onida respite the malanie. The onida prick the morrie. The onida abjure the letty. The onida abjure the morrie. The onida abjure the malanie. The malanie respite the morrie. The malanie is primaeval. The malanie prick the morrie. The malanie prick the onida. If something is sagging and it prick the morrie then it abjure the malanie. If something abjure the onida and the onida respite the morrie then the onida respite the letty. If something respite the morrie and the morrie is quaternate then it is sagging. The morrie does not eat the onida.", "logic": "\nAbjure(letty, malanie)\nManorial(morrie)\nPrimaeval(morrie)\nQuaternate(morrie)\nPrick(morrie, letty)\nAbjure(morrie, onida)\nRespite(onida, letty)\nRespite(onida, malanie)\nPrick(onida, morrie)\nAbjure(onida, letty)\nAbjure(onida, morrie)\nAbjure(onida, malanie)\nRespite(malanie, morrie)\nPrimaeval(malanie)\nPrick(malanie, morrie)\nPrick(malanie, onida)\nforall x (Sagging(x) and Prick(x, morrie) -> Abjure(x, malanie))\nforall x (Abjure(x, onida) and Respite(onida, morrie) -> Respite(onida, letty))\nforall x (Respite(x, morrie) and Quaternate(morrie) -> Sagging(x))\n\nnot Respite(morrie, onida)\n\nnot Respite(morrie, onida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The anthia sentence the bell. The iseabal is starkers. The iseabal is allergic. The iseabal is bicyclic. The iseabal intrust the anthia. The iseabal sentence the gail. The gail badge the anthia. The gail badge the bell. The gail intrust the iseabal. The gail sentence the anthia. The gail sentence the iseabal. The gail sentence the bell. The bell badge the iseabal. The bell is allergic. The bell intrust the iseabal. The bell intrust the gail. If something is indigent and it intrust the iseabal then it sentence the bell. If something sentence the gail and the gail badge the iseabal then the gail badge the anthia. If something badge the iseabal and the iseabal is bicyclic then it is indigent. The iseabal intrust the iseabal.", "logic": "\nSentence(anthia, bell)\nStarkers(iseabal)\nAllergic(iseabal)\nBicyclic(iseabal)\nIntrust(iseabal, anthia)\nSentence(iseabal, gail)\nBadge(gail, anthia)\nBadge(gail, bell)\nIntrust(gail, iseabal)\nSentence(gail, anthia)\nSentence(gail, iseabal)\nSentence(gail, bell)\nBadge(bell, iseabal)\nAllergic(bell)\nIntrust(bell, iseabal)\nIntrust(bell, gail)\nforall x (Indigent(x) and Intrust(x, iseabal) -> Sentence(x, bell))\nforall x (Sentence(x, gail) and Badge(gail, iseabal) -> Badge(gail, anthia))\nforall x (Badge(x, iseabal) and Bicyclic(iseabal) -> Indigent(x))\n\nIntrust(iseabal, iseabal)\n\nIntrust(iseabal, iseabal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-137"} {"premises": "The mercie prawn the lyndell. The mercie is aboveboard. The mercie is dynamic. The zacherie glissade the lyndell. The candide is dynamic. The candide glissade the mercie. The lyndell glissade the zacherie. If someone glissade the zacherie then the zacherie glissade the mercie. If someone glissade the mercie then they eat the candide. The zacherie glissade the lyndell.", "logic": "\nPrawn(mercie, lyndell)\nAboveboard(mercie)\nDynamic(mercie)\nGlissade(zacherie, lyndell)\nDynamic(candide)\nGlissade(candide, mercie)\nGlissade(lyndell, zacherie)\nforall x (Glissade(x, zacherie) -> Glissade(zacherie, mercie))\nforall x (Glissade(x, mercie) -> Prawn(x, candide))\n\nGlissade(zacherie, lyndell)\n\ntherefore Glissade(zacherie, lyndell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The westleigh vivisect the sampson. The westleigh is studious. The westleigh is iniquitous. The karole abase the sampson. The quintilla is iniquitous. The quintilla abase the westleigh. The sampson abase the karole. If someone abase the karole then the karole abase the westleigh. If someone abase the westleigh then they eat the quintilla. The karole does not see the sampson.", "logic": "\nVivisect(westleigh, sampson)\nStudious(westleigh)\nIniquitous(westleigh)\nAbase(karole, sampson)\nIniquitous(quintilla)\nAbase(quintilla, westleigh)\nAbase(sampson, karole)\nforall x (Abase(x, karole) -> Abase(karole, westleigh))\nforall x (Abase(x, westleigh) -> Vivisect(x, quintilla))\n\nnot Abase(karole, sampson)\n\ntherefore Abase(karole, sampson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The tristan indemnify the jobie. The tristan is clathrate. The tristan is immature. The hewe crave the jobie. The danelle is immature. The danelle crave the tristan. The jobie crave the hewe. If someone crave the hewe then the hewe crave the tristan. If someone crave the tristan then they eat the danelle. The danelle indemnify the danelle.", "logic": "\nIndemnify(tristan, jobie)\nClathrate(tristan)\nImmature(tristan)\nCrave(hewe, jobie)\nImmature(danelle)\nCrave(danelle, tristan)\nCrave(jobie, hewe)\nforall x (Crave(x, hewe) -> Crave(hewe, tristan))\nforall x (Crave(x, tristan) -> Indemnify(x, danelle))\n\nIndemnify(danelle, danelle)\n\nCrave(danelle, tristan) and forall x (Crave(x, tristan) -> Indemnify(x, danelle)) -> therefore Indemnify(danelle, danelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The carolina rush the jeremie. The carolina is allegretto. The carolina is implicit. The gwenni mist the jeremie. The neddie is implicit. The neddie mist the carolina. The jeremie mist the gwenni. If someone mist the gwenni then the gwenni mist the carolina. If someone mist the carolina then they eat the neddie. The neddie does not eat the neddie.", "logic": "\nRush(carolina, jeremie)\nAllegretto(carolina)\nImplicit(carolina)\nMist(gwenni, jeremie)\nImplicit(neddie)\nMist(neddie, carolina)\nMist(jeremie, gwenni)\nforall x (Mist(x, gwenni) -> Mist(gwenni, carolina))\nforall x (Mist(x, carolina) -> Rush(x, neddie))\n\nnot Rush(neddie, neddie)\n\nMist(neddie, carolina) and forall x (Mist(x, carolina) -> Rush(x, neddie)) -> therefore Rush(neddie, neddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The jasmin grace the carlynn. The jasmin is blastemic. The jasmin is squarish. The guthrey prune the carlynn. The wright is squarish. The wright prune the jasmin. The carlynn prune the guthrey. If someone prune the guthrey then the guthrey prune the jasmin. If someone prune the jasmin then they eat the wright. The guthrey grace the wright.", "logic": "\nGrace(jasmin, carlynn)\nBlastemic(jasmin)\nSquarish(jasmin)\nPrune(guthrey, carlynn)\nSquarish(wright)\nPrune(wright, jasmin)\nPrune(carlynn, guthrey)\nforall x (Prune(x, guthrey) -> Prune(guthrey, jasmin))\nforall x (Prune(x, jasmin) -> Grace(x, wright))\n\nGrace(guthrey, wright)\n\nPrune(carlynn, guthrey) and forall x (Prune(x, guthrey) -> Prune(guthrey, jasmin)) -> therefore Prune(guthrey, jasmin) Prune(guthrey, jasmin) and forall x (Prune(x, jasmin) -> Grace(x, wright)) -> therefore Grace(guthrey, wright)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The stevy bring the torrin. The stevy is antic. The stevy is vermilion. The daisey sham the torrin. The ashly is vermilion. The ashly sham the stevy. The torrin sham the daisey. If someone sham the daisey then the daisey sham the stevy. If someone sham the stevy then they eat the ashly. The daisey does not eat the ashly.", "logic": "\nBring(stevy, torrin)\nAntic(stevy)\nVermilion(stevy)\nSham(daisey, torrin)\nVermilion(ashly)\nSham(ashly, stevy)\nSham(torrin, daisey)\nforall x (Sham(x, daisey) -> Sham(daisey, stevy))\nforall x (Sham(x, stevy) -> Bring(x, ashly))\n\nnot Bring(daisey, ashly)\n\nSham(torrin, daisey) and forall x (Sham(x, daisey) -> Sham(daisey, stevy)) -> therefore Sham(daisey, stevy) Sham(daisey, stevy) and forall x (Sham(x, stevy) -> Bring(x, ashly)) -> therefore Bring(daisey, ashly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The cassy endear the wyndham. The cassy is chalybeate. The cassy is athletic. The elvina evacuate the wyndham. The kanya is athletic. The kanya evacuate the cassy. The wyndham evacuate the elvina. If someone evacuate the elvina then the elvina evacuate the cassy. If someone evacuate the cassy then they eat the kanya. The cassy does not eat the kanya.", "logic": "\nEndear(cassy, wyndham)\nChalybeate(cassy)\nAthletic(cassy)\nEvacuate(elvina, wyndham)\nAthletic(kanya)\nEvacuate(kanya, cassy)\nEvacuate(wyndham, elvina)\nforall x (Evacuate(x, elvina) -> Evacuate(elvina, cassy))\nforall x (Evacuate(x, cassy) -> Endear(x, kanya))\n\nnot Endear(cassy, kanya)\n\nforall x (Evacuate(x, cassy) -> Endear(x, kanya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The ambrosius feint the darby. The ambrosius is pilary. The ambrosius is upstart. The warden bitter the darby. The celestyna is upstart. The celestyna bitter the ambrosius. The darby bitter the warden. If someone bitter the warden then the warden bitter the ambrosius. If someone bitter the ambrosius then they eat the celestyna. The darby feint the celestyna.", "logic": "\nFeint(ambrosius, darby)\nPilary(ambrosius)\nUpstart(ambrosius)\nBitter(warden, darby)\nUpstart(celestyna)\nBitter(celestyna, ambrosius)\nBitter(darby, warden)\nforall x (Bitter(x, warden) -> Bitter(warden, ambrosius))\nforall x (Bitter(x, ambrosius) -> Feint(x, celestyna))\n\nFeint(darby, celestyna)\n\nforall x (Bitter(x, ambrosius) -> Feint(x, celestyna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The elisabeth foxhunt the elmer. The elisabeth is lucky. The elisabeth is smothering. The davine greet the elmer. The russell is smothering. The russell greet the elisabeth. The elmer greet the davine. If someone greet the davine then the davine greet the elisabeth. If someone greet the elisabeth then they eat the russell. The davine does not see the davine.", "logic": "\nFoxhunt(elisabeth, elmer)\nLucky(elisabeth)\nSmothering(elisabeth)\nGreet(davine, elmer)\nSmothering(russell)\nGreet(russell, elisabeth)\nGreet(elmer, davine)\nforall x (Greet(x, davine) -> Greet(davine, elisabeth))\nforall x (Greet(x, elisabeth) -> Foxhunt(x, russell))\n\nnot Greet(davine, davine)\n\nnot Greet(davine, davine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The hans monetize the julina. The hans is weeny. The hans is vulvar. The nina adduct the julina. The udall is vulvar. The udall adduct the hans. The julina adduct the nina. If someone adduct the nina then the nina adduct the hans. If someone adduct the hans then they eat the udall. The hans is young.", "logic": "\nMonetize(hans, julina)\nWeeny(hans)\nVulvar(hans)\nAdduct(nina, julina)\nVulvar(udall)\nAdduct(udall, hans)\nAdduct(julina, nina)\nforall x (Adduct(x, nina) -> Adduct(nina, hans))\nforall x (Adduct(x, hans) -> Monetize(x, udall))\n\nYoung(hans)\n\nYoung(hans) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The joni ablate the stevana. The joni is deskbound. The joni is bilateral. The cornelius lyophilize the stevana. The godwin is bilateral. The godwin lyophilize the joni. The stevana lyophilize the cornelius. If someone lyophilize the cornelius then the cornelius lyophilize the joni. If someone lyophilize the joni then they eat the godwin. The joni does not see the godwin.", "logic": "\nAblate(joni, stevana)\nDeskbound(joni)\nBilateral(joni)\nLyophilize(cornelius, stevana)\nBilateral(godwin)\nLyophilize(godwin, joni)\nLyophilize(stevana, cornelius)\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, cornelius) -> Lyophilize(cornelius, joni))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, joni) -> Ablate(x, godwin))\n\nnot Lyophilize(joni, godwin)\n\nnot Lyophilize(joni, godwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The trace trade the kizzie. The trace is appellate. The trace is peopled. The madelle derogate the kizzie. The nadia is peopled. The nadia derogate the trace. The kizzie derogate the madelle. If someone derogate the madelle then the madelle derogate the trace. If someone derogate the trace then they eat the nadia. The trace trade the madelle.", "logic": "\nTrade(trace, kizzie)\nAppellate(trace)\nPeopled(trace)\nDerogate(madelle, kizzie)\nPeopled(nadia)\nDerogate(nadia, trace)\nDerogate(kizzie, madelle)\nforall x (Derogate(x, madelle) -> Derogate(madelle, trace))\nforall x (Derogate(x, trace) -> Trade(x, nadia))\n\nTrade(trace, madelle)\n\nTrade(trace, madelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "Rheta is anecdotic. Rheta is flecked. Rheta is thousandth. Armando is anecdotic. Armando is thousandth. Zuzana is anecdotic. Zuzana is flecked. Zuzana is shoreward. Zuzana is nauruan. Zuzana is aery. Zuzana is thousandth. Zuzana is crescendo. Red, nauruan people are shoreward. If someone is aery and crescendo then they are nauruan. If someone is flecked then they are nauruan. Rheta is thousandth.", "logic": "\nAnecdotic(rheta)\nFlecked(rheta)\nThousandth(rheta)\nAnecdotic(armando)\nThousandth(armando)\nAnecdotic(zuzana)\nFlecked(zuzana)\nShoreward(zuzana)\nNauruan(zuzana)\nAery(zuzana)\nThousandth(zuzana)\nCrescendo(zuzana)\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Nauruan(x) -> Shoreward(x))\nforall x (Aery(x) and Crescendo(x) -> Nauruan(x))\nforall x (Flecked(x) -> Nauruan(x))\n\nThousandth(rheta)\n\ntherefore Thousandth(rheta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Barnabas is unnerving. Barnabas is jerkwater. Barnabas is aspheric. Floria is unnerving. Floria is aspheric. Ann is unnerving. Ann is jerkwater. Ann is simplified. Ann is almighty. Ann is squawky. Ann is aspheric. Ann is writhed. Red, almighty people are simplified. If someone is squawky and writhed then they are almighty. If someone is jerkwater then they are almighty. Ann is not unnerving.", "logic": "\nUnnerving(barnabas)\nJerkwater(barnabas)\nAspheric(barnabas)\nUnnerving(floria)\nAspheric(floria)\nUnnerving(ann)\nJerkwater(ann)\nSimplified(ann)\nAlmighty(ann)\nSquawky(ann)\nAspheric(ann)\nWrithed(ann)\nforall x (Aspheric(x) and Almighty(x) -> Simplified(x))\nforall x (Squawky(x) and Writhed(x) -> Almighty(x))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Almighty(x))\n\nnot Unnerving(ann)\n\ntherefore Unnerving(ann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Patrica is ferine. Patrica is biographic. Patrica is eastside. Emmett is ferine. Emmett is eastside. Althea is ferine. Althea is biographic. Althea is wavy. Althea is glimmery. Althea is norse. Althea is eastside. Althea is gilbertian. Red, glimmery people are wavy. If someone is norse and gilbertian then they are glimmery. If someone is biographic then they are glimmery. Patrica is glimmery.", "logic": "\nFerine(patrica)\nBiographic(patrica)\nEastside(patrica)\nFerine(emmett)\nEastside(emmett)\nFerine(althea)\nBiographic(althea)\nWavy(althea)\nGlimmery(althea)\nNorse(althea)\nEastside(althea)\nGilbertian(althea)\nforall x (Eastside(x) and Glimmery(x) -> Wavy(x))\nforall x (Norse(x) and Gilbertian(x) -> Glimmery(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Glimmery(x))\n\nGlimmery(patrica)\n\nBiographic(patrica) and forall x (Biographic(x) -> Glimmery(x)) -> therefore Glimmery(patrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Tully is debonair. Tully is riotous. Tully is timorese. Noemi is debonair. Noemi is timorese. Marjory is debonair. Marjory is riotous. Marjory is fiendish. Marjory is topping. Marjory is stoned. Marjory is timorese. Marjory is slanting. Red, topping people are fiendish. If someone is stoned and slanting then they are topping. If someone is riotous then they are topping. Tully is not topping.", "logic": "\nDebonair(tully)\nRiotous(tully)\nTimorese(tully)\nDebonair(noemi)\nTimorese(noemi)\nDebonair(marjory)\nRiotous(marjory)\nFiendish(marjory)\nTopping(marjory)\nStoned(marjory)\nTimorese(marjory)\nSlanting(marjory)\nforall x (Timorese(x) and Topping(x) -> Fiendish(x))\nforall x (Stoned(x) and Slanting(x) -> Topping(x))\nforall x (Riotous(x) -> Topping(x))\n\nnot Topping(tully)\n\nRiotous(tully) and forall x (Riotous(x) -> Topping(x)) -> therefore Topping(tully)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Carmelia is mutinous. Carmelia is democratic. Carmelia is inapposite. Jennie is mutinous. Jennie is inapposite. Crawford is mutinous. Crawford is democratic. Crawford is unanimated. Crawford is avian. Crawford is armoured. Crawford is inapposite. Crawford is synoecious. Red, avian people are unanimated. If someone is armoured and synoecious then they are avian. If someone is democratic then they are avian. Carmelia is unanimated.", "logic": "\nMutinous(carmelia)\nDemocratic(carmelia)\nInapposite(carmelia)\nMutinous(jennie)\nInapposite(jennie)\nMutinous(crawford)\nDemocratic(crawford)\nUnanimated(crawford)\nAvian(crawford)\nArmoured(crawford)\nInapposite(crawford)\nSynoecious(crawford)\nforall x (Inapposite(x) and Avian(x) -> Unanimated(x))\nforall x (Armoured(x) and Synoecious(x) -> Avian(x))\nforall x (Democratic(x) -> Avian(x))\n\nUnanimated(carmelia)\n\nDemocratic(carmelia) and forall x (Democratic(x) -> Avian(x)) -> therefore Avian(carmelia) Inapposite(carmelia) and Avian(carmelia) and forall x (Inapposite(x) and Avian(x) -> Unanimated(x)) -> therefore Unanimated(carmelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Ebeneser is diluvian. Ebeneser is shivery. Ebeneser is hygienic. Pia is diluvian. Pia is hygienic. Beaufort is diluvian. Beaufort is shivery. Beaufort is voltarian. Beaufort is kinky. Beaufort is apposite. Beaufort is hygienic. Beaufort is cursorial. Red, kinky people are voltarian. If someone is apposite and cursorial then they are kinky. If someone is shivery then they are kinky. Ebeneser is not voltarian.", "logic": "\nDiluvian(ebeneser)\nShivery(ebeneser)\nHygienic(ebeneser)\nDiluvian(pia)\nHygienic(pia)\nDiluvian(beaufort)\nShivery(beaufort)\nVoltarian(beaufort)\nKinky(beaufort)\nApposite(beaufort)\nHygienic(beaufort)\nCursorial(beaufort)\nforall x (Hygienic(x) and Kinky(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Apposite(x) and Cursorial(x) -> Kinky(x))\nforall x (Shivery(x) -> Kinky(x))\n\nnot Voltarian(ebeneser)\n\nShivery(ebeneser) and forall x (Shivery(x) -> Kinky(x)) -> therefore Kinky(ebeneser) Hygienic(ebeneser) and Kinky(ebeneser) and forall x (Hygienic(x) and Kinky(x) -> Voltarian(x)) -> therefore Voltarian(ebeneser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Jannel is dicky. Jannel is varicose. Jannel is alkalotic. Salman is dicky. Salman is alkalotic. Simonne is dicky. Simonne is varicose. Simonne is unshakable. Simonne is rainy. Simonne is subscript. Simonne is alkalotic. Simonne is weakly. Red, rainy people are unshakable. If someone is subscript and weakly then they are rainy. If someone is varicose then they are rainy. Salman is not rainy.", "logic": "\nDicky(jannel)\nVaricose(jannel)\nAlkalotic(jannel)\nDicky(salman)\nAlkalotic(salman)\nDicky(simonne)\nVaricose(simonne)\nUnshakable(simonne)\nRainy(simonne)\nSubscript(simonne)\nAlkalotic(simonne)\nWeakly(simonne)\nforall x (Alkalotic(x) and Rainy(x) -> Unshakable(x))\nforall x (Subscript(x) and Weakly(x) -> Rainy(x))\nforall x (Varicose(x) -> Rainy(x))\n\nnot Rainy(salman)\n\nforall x (Subscript(x) and Weakly(x) -> Rainy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Viola is mettlesome. Viola is metonymic. Viola is unequal. Anjanette is mettlesome. Anjanette is unequal. Daryle is mettlesome. Daryle is metonymic. Daryle is nonfatal. Daryle is uncousinly. Daryle is decayable. Daryle is unequal. Daryle is verminous. Red, uncousinly people are nonfatal. If someone is decayable and verminous then they are uncousinly. If someone is metonymic then they are uncousinly. Anjanette is nonfatal.", "logic": "\nMettlesome(viola)\nMetonymic(viola)\nUnequal(viola)\nMettlesome(anjanette)\nUnequal(anjanette)\nMettlesome(daryle)\nMetonymic(daryle)\nNonfatal(daryle)\nUncousinly(daryle)\nDecayable(daryle)\nUnequal(daryle)\nVerminous(daryle)\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Uncousinly(x) -> Nonfatal(x))\nforall x (Decayable(x) and Verminous(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\nforall x (Metonymic(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\n\nNonfatal(anjanette)\n\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Uncousinly(x) -> Nonfatal(x)) <- forall x (Decayable(x) and Verminous(x) -> Uncousinly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Nisa is biface. Nisa is loathly. Nisa is decorated. Sayer is biface. Sayer is decorated. Winnie is biface. Winnie is loathly. Winnie is masterless. Winnie is succinic. Winnie is national. Winnie is decorated. Winnie is bicameral. Red, succinic people are masterless. If someone is national and bicameral then they are succinic. If someone is loathly then they are succinic. Nisa is not national.", "logic": "\nBiface(nisa)\nLoathly(nisa)\nDecorated(nisa)\nBiface(sayer)\nDecorated(sayer)\nBiface(winnie)\nLoathly(winnie)\nMasterless(winnie)\nSuccinic(winnie)\nNational(winnie)\nDecorated(winnie)\nBicameral(winnie)\nforall x (Decorated(x) and Succinic(x) -> Masterless(x))\nforall x (National(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Succinic(x))\nforall x (Loathly(x) -> Succinic(x))\n\nnot National(nisa)\n\nnot National(nisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Kyla is impersonal. Kyla is endodontic. Kyla is dishonored. Eolanda is impersonal. Eolanda is dishonored. Alicea is impersonal. Alicea is endodontic. Alicea is humbling. Alicea is atrophied. Alicea is squarish. Alicea is dishonored. Alicea is mandean. Red, atrophied people are humbling. If someone is squarish and mandean then they are atrophied. If someone is endodontic then they are atrophied. Kyla is mandean.", "logic": "\nImpersonal(kyla)\nEndodontic(kyla)\nDishonored(kyla)\nImpersonal(eolanda)\nDishonored(eolanda)\nImpersonal(alicea)\nEndodontic(alicea)\nHumbling(alicea)\nAtrophied(alicea)\nSquarish(alicea)\nDishonored(alicea)\nMandean(alicea)\nforall x (Dishonored(x) and Atrophied(x) -> Humbling(x))\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Mandean(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) -> Atrophied(x))\n\nMandean(kyla)\n\nMandean(kyla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Stephen is lucullan. Stephen is unbearable. Stephen is lanate. Yalonda is lucullan. Yalonda is lanate. Virginie is lucullan. Virginie is unbearable. Virginie is jinxed. Virginie is limber. Virginie is aortal. Virginie is lanate. Virginie is sixteenth. Red, limber people are jinxed. If someone is aortal and sixteenth then they are limber. If someone is unbearable then they are limber. Yalonda is not aortal.", "logic": "\nLucullan(stephen)\nUnbearable(stephen)\nLanate(stephen)\nLucullan(yalonda)\nLanate(yalonda)\nLucullan(virginie)\nUnbearable(virginie)\nJinxed(virginie)\nLimber(virginie)\nAortal(virginie)\nLanate(virginie)\nSixteenth(virginie)\nforall x (Lanate(x) and Limber(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Aortal(x) and Sixteenth(x) -> Limber(x))\nforall x (Unbearable(x) -> Limber(x))\n\nnot Aortal(yalonda)\n\nnot Aortal(yalonda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "Shelton is loosened. Shelton is pricey. Shelton is unbleached. Ethelda is loosened. Ethelda is unbleached. Valerye is loosened. Valerye is pricey. Valerye is unrhythmic. Valerye is unmixed. Valerye is unsparing. Valerye is unbleached. Valerye is fitful. Red, unmixed people are unrhythmic. If someone is unsparing and fitful then they are unmixed. If someone is pricey then they are unmixed. Ethelda is fitful.", "logic": "\nLoosened(shelton)\nPricey(shelton)\nUnbleached(shelton)\nLoosened(ethelda)\nUnbleached(ethelda)\nLoosened(valerye)\nPricey(valerye)\nUnrhythmic(valerye)\nUnmixed(valerye)\nUnsparing(valerye)\nUnbleached(valerye)\nFitful(valerye)\nforall x (Unbleached(x) and Unmixed(x) -> Unrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Unsparing(x) and Fitful(x) -> Unmixed(x))\nforall x (Pricey(x) -> Unmixed(x))\n\nFitful(ethelda)\n\nFitful(ethelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-519"} {"premises": "The devina disconcert the sven. The devina theorize the sven. The sven does not eat the devina. If something disconcert the devina then the devina disconcert the sven. If something disconcert the sven then it distend the devina. If something distend the sven and it is favored then it distend the devina. If something is favored then it is not roumanian. If the devina disconcert the sven then the devina is roumanian. If something is favored and it theorize the sven then the sven theorize the devina. If something disconcert the sven and it is roumanian then it is contented. If the sven does not need the devina then the sven is contented. The sven does not eat the devina.", "logic": "\nDisconcert(devina, sven)\nTheorize(devina, sven)\nnot Disconcert(sven, devina)\nforall x (Disconcert(x, devina) -> Disconcert(devina, sven))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, sven) -> Distend(x, devina))\nforall x (Distend(x, sven) and Favored(x) -> Distend(x, devina))\nforall x (Favored(x) -> not Roumanian(x))\nDisconcert(devina, sven) -> Roumanian(devina)\nforall x (Favored(x) and Theorize(x, sven) -> Theorize(sven, devina))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, sven) and Roumanian(x) -> Contented(x))\nnot Theorize(sven, devina) -> Contented(sven)\n\nnot Disconcert(sven, devina)\n\ntherefore not Disconcert(sven, devina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The claude evangelize the selby. The claude unreel the selby. The selby does not eat the claude. If something evangelize the claude then the claude evangelize the selby. If something evangelize the selby then it cheer the claude. If something cheer the selby and it is zoological then it cheer the claude. If something is zoological then it is not hardbound. If the claude evangelize the selby then the claude is hardbound. If something is zoological and it unreel the selby then the selby unreel the claude. If something evangelize the selby and it is hardbound then it is receding. If the selby does not need the claude then the selby is receding. The selby evangelize the claude.", "logic": "\nEvangelize(claude, selby)\nUnreel(claude, selby)\nnot Evangelize(selby, claude)\nforall x (Evangelize(x, claude) -> Evangelize(claude, selby))\nforall x (Evangelize(x, selby) -> Cheer(x, claude))\nforall x (Cheer(x, selby) and Zoological(x) -> Cheer(x, claude))\nforall x (Zoological(x) -> not Hardbound(x))\nEvangelize(claude, selby) -> Hardbound(claude)\nforall x (Zoological(x) and Unreel(x, selby) -> Unreel(selby, claude))\nforall x (Evangelize(x, selby) and Hardbound(x) -> Receding(x))\nnot Unreel(selby, claude) -> Receding(selby)\n\nEvangelize(selby, claude)\n\ntherefore not Evangelize(selby, claude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The nealy blink the susanetta. The nealy unitise the susanetta. The susanetta does not eat the nealy. If something blink the nealy then the nealy blink the susanetta. If something blink the susanetta then it incurvate the nealy. If something incurvate the susanetta and it is statuesque then it incurvate the nealy. If something is statuesque then it is not scrupulous. If the nealy blink the susanetta then the nealy is scrupulous. If something is statuesque and it unitise the susanetta then the susanetta unitise the nealy. If something blink the susanetta and it is scrupulous then it is steamy. If the susanetta does not need the nealy then the susanetta is steamy. The nealy incurvate the nealy.", "logic": "\nBlink(nealy, susanetta)\nUnitise(nealy, susanetta)\nnot Blink(susanetta, nealy)\nforall x (Blink(x, nealy) -> Blink(nealy, susanetta))\nforall x (Blink(x, susanetta) -> Incurvate(x, nealy))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, susanetta) and Statuesque(x) -> Incurvate(x, nealy))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> not Scrupulous(x))\nBlink(nealy, susanetta) -> Scrupulous(nealy)\nforall x (Statuesque(x) and Unitise(x, susanetta) -> Unitise(susanetta, nealy))\nforall x (Blink(x, susanetta) and Scrupulous(x) -> Steamy(x))\nnot Unitise(susanetta, nealy) -> Steamy(susanetta)\n\nIncurvate(nealy, nealy)\n\nBlink(nealy, susanetta) and forall x (Blink(x, susanetta) -> Incurvate(x, nealy)) -> therefore Incurvate(nealy, nealy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The wallace cicatrize the jimmie. The wallace modernize the jimmie. The jimmie does not eat the wallace. If something cicatrize the wallace then the wallace cicatrize the jimmie. If something cicatrize the jimmie then it interleave the wallace. If something interleave the jimmie and it is lightsome then it interleave the wallace. If something is lightsome then it is not offended. If the wallace cicatrize the jimmie then the wallace is offended. If something is lightsome and it modernize the jimmie then the jimmie modernize the wallace. If something cicatrize the jimmie and it is offended then it is devotional. If the jimmie does not need the wallace then the jimmie is devotional. The wallace is not offended.", "logic": "\nCicatrize(wallace, jimmie)\nModernize(wallace, jimmie)\nnot Cicatrize(jimmie, wallace)\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, wallace) -> Cicatrize(wallace, jimmie))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, jimmie) -> Interleave(x, wallace))\nforall x (Interleave(x, jimmie) and Lightsome(x) -> Interleave(x, wallace))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) -> not Offended(x))\nCicatrize(wallace, jimmie) -> Offended(wallace)\nforall x (Lightsome(x) and Modernize(x, jimmie) -> Modernize(jimmie, wallace))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, jimmie) and Offended(x) -> Devotional(x))\nnot Modernize(jimmie, wallace) -> Devotional(jimmie)\n\nnot Offended(wallace)\n\nCicatrize(wallace, jimmie) and Cicatrize(wallace, jimmie) -> Offended(wallace) -> therefore Offended(wallace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The dani balkanize the betsy. The dani clamor the betsy. The betsy does not eat the dani. If something balkanize the dani then the dani balkanize the betsy. If something balkanize the betsy then it degrade the dani. If something degrade the betsy and it is faltering then it degrade the dani. If something is faltering then it is not nubbly. If the dani balkanize the betsy then the dani is nubbly. If something is faltering and it clamor the betsy then the betsy clamor the dani. If something balkanize the betsy and it is nubbly then it is despotical. If the betsy does not need the dani then the betsy is despotical. The dani is despotical.", "logic": "\nBalkanize(dani, betsy)\nClamor(dani, betsy)\nnot Balkanize(betsy, dani)\nforall x (Balkanize(x, dani) -> Balkanize(dani, betsy))\nforall x (Balkanize(x, betsy) -> Degrade(x, dani))\nforall x (Degrade(x, betsy) and Faltering(x) -> Degrade(x, dani))\nforall x (Faltering(x) -> not Nubbly(x))\nBalkanize(dani, betsy) -> Nubbly(dani)\nforall x (Faltering(x) and Clamor(x, betsy) -> Clamor(betsy, dani))\nforall x (Balkanize(x, betsy) and Nubbly(x) -> Despotical(x))\nnot Clamor(betsy, dani) -> Despotical(betsy)\n\nDespotical(dani)\n\nBalkanize(dani, betsy) and Balkanize(dani, betsy) -> Nubbly(dani) -> therefore Nubbly(dani) Balkanize(dani, betsy) and Nubbly(dani) and forall x (Balkanize(x, betsy) and Nubbly(x) -> Despotical(x)) -> therefore Despotical(dani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The daniela sliver the shannon. The daniela ensnare the shannon. The shannon does not eat the daniela. If something sliver the daniela then the daniela sliver the shannon. If something sliver the shannon then it doctor the daniela. If something doctor the shannon and it is saturnine then it doctor the daniela. If something is saturnine then it is not accoutered. If the daniela sliver the shannon then the daniela is accoutered. If something is saturnine and it ensnare the shannon then the shannon ensnare the daniela. If something sliver the shannon and it is accoutered then it is mormon. If the shannon does not need the daniela then the shannon is mormon. The daniela is not mormon.", "logic": "\nSliver(daniela, shannon)\nEnsnare(daniela, shannon)\nnot Sliver(shannon, daniela)\nforall x (Sliver(x, daniela) -> Sliver(daniela, shannon))\nforall x (Sliver(x, shannon) -> Doctor(x, daniela))\nforall x (Doctor(x, shannon) and Saturnine(x) -> Doctor(x, daniela))\nforall x (Saturnine(x) -> not Accoutered(x))\nSliver(daniela, shannon) -> Accoutered(daniela)\nforall x (Saturnine(x) and Ensnare(x, shannon) -> Ensnare(shannon, daniela))\nforall x (Sliver(x, shannon) and Accoutered(x) -> Mormon(x))\nnot Ensnare(shannon, daniela) -> Mormon(shannon)\n\nnot Mormon(daniela)\n\nSliver(daniela, shannon) and Sliver(daniela, shannon) -> Accoutered(daniela) -> therefore Accoutered(daniela) Sliver(daniela, shannon) and Accoutered(daniela) and forall x (Sliver(x, shannon) and Accoutered(x) -> Mormon(x)) -> therefore Mormon(daniela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The brooke pull the zelma. The brooke submerge the zelma. The zelma does not eat the brooke. If something pull the brooke then the brooke pull the zelma. If something pull the zelma then it rock the brooke. If something rock the zelma and it is benevolent then it rock the brooke. If something is benevolent then it is not scrimpy. If the brooke pull the zelma then the brooke is scrimpy. If something is benevolent and it submerge the zelma then the zelma submerge the brooke. If something pull the zelma and it is scrimpy then it is superior. If the zelma does not need the brooke then the zelma is superior. The zelma does not visit the brooke.", "logic": "\nPull(brooke, zelma)\nSubmerge(brooke, zelma)\nnot Pull(zelma, brooke)\nforall x (Pull(x, brooke) -> Pull(brooke, zelma))\nforall x (Pull(x, zelma) -> Rock(x, brooke))\nforall x (Rock(x, zelma) and Benevolent(x) -> Rock(x, brooke))\nforall x (Benevolent(x) -> not Scrimpy(x))\nPull(brooke, zelma) -> Scrimpy(brooke)\nforall x (Benevolent(x) and Submerge(x, zelma) -> Submerge(zelma, brooke))\nforall x (Pull(x, zelma) and Scrimpy(x) -> Superior(x))\nnot Submerge(zelma, brooke) -> Superior(zelma)\n\nnot Rock(zelma, brooke)\n\nforall x (Pull(x, zelma) -> Rock(x, brooke)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The jasper demise the levon. The jasper staff the levon. The levon does not eat the jasper. If something demise the jasper then the jasper demise the levon. If something demise the levon then it urbanise the jasper. If something urbanise the levon and it is deviant then it urbanise the jasper. If something is deviant then it is not hardcover. If the jasper demise the levon then the jasper is hardcover. If something is deviant and it staff the levon then the levon staff the jasper. If something demise the levon and it is hardcover then it is unspoilt. If the levon does not need the jasper then the levon is unspoilt. The levon staff the jasper.", "logic": "\nDemise(jasper, levon)\nStaff(jasper, levon)\nnot Demise(levon, jasper)\nforall x (Demise(x, jasper) -> Demise(jasper, levon))\nforall x (Demise(x, levon) -> Urbanise(x, jasper))\nforall x (Urbanise(x, levon) and Deviant(x) -> Urbanise(x, jasper))\nforall x (Deviant(x) -> not Hardcover(x))\nDemise(jasper, levon) -> Hardcover(jasper)\nforall x (Deviant(x) and Staff(x, levon) -> Staff(levon, jasper))\nforall x (Demise(x, levon) and Hardcover(x) -> Unspoilt(x))\nnot Staff(levon, jasper) -> Unspoilt(levon)\n\nStaff(levon, jasper)\n\nforall x (Deviant(x) and Staff(x, levon) -> Staff(levon, jasper)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The ava airbrush the haskel. The ava snake the haskel. The haskel does not eat the ava. If something airbrush the ava then the ava airbrush the haskel. If something airbrush the haskel then it overheat the ava. If something overheat the haskel and it is virulent then it overheat the ava. If something is virulent then it is not minimalist. If the ava airbrush the haskel then the ava is minimalist. If something is virulent and it snake the haskel then the haskel snake the ava. If something airbrush the haskel and it is minimalist then it is ruined. If the haskel does not need the ava then the haskel is ruined. The haskel is not ruined.", "logic": "\nAirbrush(ava, haskel)\nSnake(ava, haskel)\nnot Airbrush(haskel, ava)\nforall x (Airbrush(x, ava) -> Airbrush(ava, haskel))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, haskel) -> Overheat(x, ava))\nforall x (Overheat(x, haskel) and Virulent(x) -> Overheat(x, ava))\nforall x (Virulent(x) -> not Minimalist(x))\nAirbrush(ava, haskel) -> Minimalist(ava)\nforall x (Virulent(x) and Snake(x, haskel) -> Snake(haskel, ava))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, haskel) and Minimalist(x) -> Ruined(x))\nnot Snake(haskel, ava) -> Ruined(haskel)\n\nnot Ruined(haskel)\n\nforall x (Airbrush(x, haskel) and Minimalist(x) -> Ruined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The peggi trundle the sydelle. The peggi pale the sydelle. The sydelle does not eat the peggi. If something trundle the peggi then the peggi trundle the sydelle. If something trundle the sydelle then it ammoniate the peggi. If something ammoniate the sydelle and it is unarmed then it ammoniate the peggi. If something is unarmed then it is not reanimated. If the peggi trundle the sydelle then the peggi is reanimated. If something is unarmed and it pale the sydelle then the sydelle pale the peggi. If something trundle the sydelle and it is reanimated then it is wheelless. If the sydelle does not need the peggi then the sydelle is wheelless. The sydelle ammoniate the sydelle.", "logic": "\nTrundle(peggi, sydelle)\nPale(peggi, sydelle)\nnot Trundle(sydelle, peggi)\nforall x (Trundle(x, peggi) -> Trundle(peggi, sydelle))\nforall x (Trundle(x, sydelle) -> Ammoniate(x, peggi))\nforall x (Ammoniate(x, sydelle) and Unarmed(x) -> Ammoniate(x, peggi))\nforall x (Unarmed(x) -> not Reanimated(x))\nTrundle(peggi, sydelle) -> Reanimated(peggi)\nforall x (Unarmed(x) and Pale(x, sydelle) -> Pale(sydelle, peggi))\nforall x (Trundle(x, sydelle) and Reanimated(x) -> Wheelless(x))\nnot Pale(sydelle, peggi) -> Wheelless(sydelle)\n\nAmmoniate(sydelle, sydelle)\n\nAmmoniate(sydelle, sydelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The quentin crawfish the lane. The quentin osculate the lane. The lane does not eat the quentin. If something crawfish the quentin then the quentin crawfish the lane. If something crawfish the lane then it virilize the quentin. If something virilize the lane and it is unbaptised then it virilize the quentin. If something is unbaptised then it is not graduated. If the quentin crawfish the lane then the quentin is graduated. If something is unbaptised and it osculate the lane then the lane osculate the quentin. If something crawfish the lane and it is graduated then it is unheaded. If the lane does not need the quentin then the lane is unheaded. The quentin does not need the quentin.", "logic": "\nCrawfish(quentin, lane)\nOsculate(quentin, lane)\nnot Crawfish(lane, quentin)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, quentin) -> Crawfish(quentin, lane))\nforall x (Crawfish(x, lane) -> Virilize(x, quentin))\nforall x (Virilize(x, lane) and Unbaptised(x) -> Virilize(x, quentin))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> not Graduated(x))\nCrawfish(quentin, lane) -> Graduated(quentin)\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and Osculate(x, lane) -> Osculate(lane, quentin))\nforall x (Crawfish(x, lane) and Graduated(x) -> Unheaded(x))\nnot Osculate(lane, quentin) -> Unheaded(lane)\n\nnot Osculate(quentin, quentin)\n\nnot Osculate(quentin, quentin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The breena notify the lucretia. The breena taste the lucretia. The lucretia does not eat the breena. If something notify the breena then the breena notify the lucretia. If something notify the lucretia then it glissade the breena. If something glissade the lucretia and it is unfenced then it glissade the breena. If something is unfenced then it is not glassless. If the breena notify the lucretia then the breena is glassless. If something is unfenced and it taste the lucretia then the lucretia taste the breena. If something notify the lucretia and it is glassless then it is shelled. If the lucretia does not need the breena then the lucretia is shelled. The breena glissade the lucretia.", "logic": "\nNotify(breena, lucretia)\nTaste(breena, lucretia)\nnot Notify(lucretia, breena)\nforall x (Notify(x, breena) -> Notify(breena, lucretia))\nforall x (Notify(x, lucretia) -> Glissade(x, breena))\nforall x (Glissade(x, lucretia) and Unfenced(x) -> Glissade(x, breena))\nforall x (Unfenced(x) -> not Glassless(x))\nNotify(breena, lucretia) -> Glassless(breena)\nforall x (Unfenced(x) and Taste(x, lucretia) -> Taste(lucretia, breena))\nforall x (Notify(x, lucretia) and Glassless(x) -> Shelled(x))\nnot Taste(lucretia, breena) -> Shelled(lucretia)\n\nGlissade(breena, lucretia)\n\nGlissade(breena, lucretia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1453"} {"premises": "The kikelia fleck the fanny. The fanny murk the kikelia. The madella is appressed. If the fanny antagonise the kikelia and the kikelia does not see the madella then the madella does not need the fanny. If someone murk the kikelia and the kikelia fleck the fanny then they do not see the kikelia. If the kikelia fleck the fanny and the kikelia is unawakened then the fanny does not need the kikelia. If the fanny fleck the madella and the madella is appressed then the madella does not like the fanny. If someone antagonise the madella then the madella does not like the fanny. If someone murk the kikelia and they do not see the kikelia then they are not appressed. The fanny murk the kikelia.", "logic": "\nFleck(kikelia, fanny)\nMurk(fanny, kikelia)\nAppressed(madella)\nAntagonise(fanny, kikelia) and not Fleck(kikelia, madella) -> not Murk(madella, fanny)\nforall x (Murk(x, kikelia) and Fleck(kikelia, fanny) -> not Fleck(x, kikelia))\nFleck(kikelia, fanny) and Unawakened(kikelia) -> not Murk(fanny, kikelia)\nFleck(fanny, madella) and Appressed(madella) -> not Antagonise(madella, fanny)\nforall x (Antagonise(x, madella) -> not Antagonise(madella, fanny))\nforall x (Murk(x, kikelia) and not Fleck(x, kikelia) -> not Appressed(x))\n\nMurk(fanny, kikelia)\n\ntherefore Murk(fanny, kikelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The emery vacillate the august. The august slop the emery. The pammie is abbatial. If the august hypnotise the emery and the emery does not see the pammie then the pammie does not need the august. If someone slop the emery and the emery vacillate the august then they do not see the emery. If the emery vacillate the august and the emery is freewill then the august does not need the emery. If the august vacillate the pammie and the pammie is abbatial then the pammie does not like the august. If someone hypnotise the pammie then the pammie does not like the august. If someone slop the emery and they do not see the emery then they are not abbatial. The emery does not see the august.", "logic": "\nVacillate(emery, august)\nSlop(august, emery)\nAbbatial(pammie)\nHypnotise(august, emery) and not Vacillate(emery, pammie) -> not Slop(pammie, august)\nforall x (Slop(x, emery) and Vacillate(emery, august) -> not Vacillate(x, emery))\nVacillate(emery, august) and Freewill(emery) -> not Slop(august, emery)\nVacillate(august, pammie) and Abbatial(pammie) -> not Hypnotise(pammie, august)\nforall x (Hypnotise(x, pammie) -> not Hypnotise(pammie, august))\nforall x (Slop(x, emery) and not Vacillate(x, emery) -> not Abbatial(x))\n\nnot Vacillate(emery, august)\n\ntherefore Vacillate(emery, august)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The adara backtrack the gerti. The gerti deterge the adara. The june is cyclonic. If the gerti increase the adara and the adara does not see the june then the june does not need the gerti. If someone deterge the adara and the adara backtrack the gerti then they do not see the adara. If the adara backtrack the gerti and the adara is noticeable then the gerti does not need the adara. If the gerti backtrack the june and the june is cyclonic then the june does not like the gerti. If someone increase the june then the june does not like the gerti. If someone deterge the adara and they do not see the adara then they are not cyclonic. The gerti does not see the adara.", "logic": "\nBacktrack(adara, gerti)\nDeterge(gerti, adara)\nCyclonic(june)\nIncrease(gerti, adara) and not Backtrack(adara, june) -> not Deterge(june, gerti)\nforall x (Deterge(x, adara) and Backtrack(adara, gerti) -> not Backtrack(x, adara))\nBacktrack(adara, gerti) and Noticeable(adara) -> not Deterge(gerti, adara)\nBacktrack(gerti, june) and Cyclonic(june) -> not Increase(june, gerti)\nforall x (Increase(x, june) -> not Increase(june, gerti))\nforall x (Deterge(x, adara) and not Backtrack(x, adara) -> not Cyclonic(x))\n\nnot Backtrack(gerti, adara)\n\nDeterge(gerti, adara) and Backtrack(adara, gerti) and forall x (Deterge(x, adara) and Backtrack(adara, gerti) -> not Backtrack(x, adara)) -> therefore not Backtrack(gerti, adara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The oprah confuse the torrence. The torrence chondrify the oprah. The lenee is nubby. If the torrence fink the oprah and the oprah does not see the lenee then the lenee does not need the torrence. If someone chondrify the oprah and the oprah confuse the torrence then they do not see the oprah. If the oprah confuse the torrence and the oprah is aeriform then the torrence does not need the oprah. If the torrence confuse the lenee and the lenee is nubby then the lenee does not like the torrence. If someone fink the lenee then the lenee does not like the torrence. If someone chondrify the oprah and they do not see the oprah then they are not nubby. The torrence confuse the oprah.", "logic": "\nConfuse(oprah, torrence)\nChondrify(torrence, oprah)\nNubby(lenee)\nFink(torrence, oprah) and not Confuse(oprah, lenee) -> not Chondrify(lenee, torrence)\nforall x (Chondrify(x, oprah) and Confuse(oprah, torrence) -> not Confuse(x, oprah))\nConfuse(oprah, torrence) and Aeriform(oprah) -> not Chondrify(torrence, oprah)\nConfuse(torrence, lenee) and Nubby(lenee) -> not Fink(lenee, torrence)\nforall x (Fink(x, lenee) -> not Fink(lenee, torrence))\nforall x (Chondrify(x, oprah) and not Confuse(x, oprah) -> not Nubby(x))\n\nConfuse(torrence, oprah)\n\nChondrify(torrence, oprah) and Confuse(oprah, torrence) and forall x (Chondrify(x, oprah) and Confuse(oprah, torrence) -> not Confuse(x, oprah)) -> therefore not Confuse(torrence, oprah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The jason bacterize the tabbatha. The tabbatha ladle the jason. The yank is mesenteric. If the tabbatha busy the jason and the jason does not see the yank then the yank does not need the tabbatha. If someone ladle the jason and the jason bacterize the tabbatha then they do not see the jason. If the jason bacterize the tabbatha and the jason is intimal then the tabbatha does not need the jason. If the tabbatha bacterize the yank and the yank is mesenteric then the yank does not like the tabbatha. If someone busy the yank then the yank does not like the tabbatha. If someone ladle the jason and they do not see the jason then they are not mesenteric. The tabbatha is not mesenteric.", "logic": "\nBacterize(jason, tabbatha)\nLadle(tabbatha, jason)\nMesenteric(yank)\nBusy(tabbatha, jason) and not Bacterize(jason, yank) -> not Ladle(yank, tabbatha)\nforall x (Ladle(x, jason) and Bacterize(jason, tabbatha) -> not Bacterize(x, jason))\nBacterize(jason, tabbatha) and Intimal(jason) -> not Ladle(tabbatha, jason)\nBacterize(tabbatha, yank) and Mesenteric(yank) -> not Busy(yank, tabbatha)\nforall x (Busy(x, yank) -> not Busy(yank, tabbatha))\nforall x (Ladle(x, jason) and not Bacterize(x, jason) -> not Mesenteric(x))\n\nnot Mesenteric(tabbatha)\n\nLadle(tabbatha, jason) and Bacterize(jason, tabbatha) and forall x (Ladle(x, jason) and Bacterize(jason, tabbatha) -> not Bacterize(x, jason)) -> therefore not Bacterize(tabbatha, jason) Ladle(tabbatha, jason) and not Bacterize(tabbatha, jason) and forall x (Ladle(x, jason) and not Bacterize(x, jason) -> not Mesenteric(x)) -> therefore not Mesenteric(tabbatha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The odetta feminise the tedi. The tedi disconcert the odetta. The maggi is incautious. If the tedi ruin the odetta and the odetta does not see the maggi then the maggi does not need the tedi. If someone disconcert the odetta and the odetta feminise the tedi then they do not see the odetta. If the odetta feminise the tedi and the odetta is pronounced then the tedi does not need the odetta. If the tedi feminise the maggi and the maggi is incautious then the maggi does not like the tedi. If someone ruin the maggi then the maggi does not like the tedi. If someone disconcert the odetta and they do not see the odetta then they are not incautious. The tedi is incautious.", "logic": "\nFeminise(odetta, tedi)\nDisconcert(tedi, odetta)\nIncautious(maggi)\nRuin(tedi, odetta) and not Feminise(odetta, maggi) -> not Disconcert(maggi, tedi)\nforall x (Disconcert(x, odetta) and Feminise(odetta, tedi) -> not Feminise(x, odetta))\nFeminise(odetta, tedi) and Pronounced(odetta) -> not Disconcert(tedi, odetta)\nFeminise(tedi, maggi) and Incautious(maggi) -> not Ruin(maggi, tedi)\nforall x (Ruin(x, maggi) -> not Ruin(maggi, tedi))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, odetta) and not Feminise(x, odetta) -> not Incautious(x))\n\nIncautious(tedi)\n\nDisconcert(tedi, odetta) and Feminise(odetta, tedi) and forall x (Disconcert(x, odetta) and Feminise(odetta, tedi) -> not Feminise(x, odetta)) -> therefore not Feminise(tedi, odetta) Disconcert(tedi, odetta) and not Feminise(tedi, odetta) and forall x (Disconcert(x, odetta) and not Feminise(x, odetta) -> not Incautious(x)) -> therefore not Incautious(tedi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The donia nucleate the burnaby. The burnaby harbour the donia. The kevina is treasonous. If the burnaby checkmate the donia and the donia does not see the kevina then the kevina does not need the burnaby. If someone harbour the donia and the donia nucleate the burnaby then they do not see the donia. If the donia nucleate the burnaby and the donia is honduran then the burnaby does not need the donia. If the burnaby nucleate the kevina and the kevina is treasonous then the kevina does not like the burnaby. If someone checkmate the kevina then the kevina does not like the burnaby. If someone harbour the donia and they do not see the donia then they are not treasonous. The burnaby does not like the donia.", "logic": "\nNucleate(donia, burnaby)\nHarbour(burnaby, donia)\nTreasonous(kevina)\nCheckmate(burnaby, donia) and not Nucleate(donia, kevina) -> not Harbour(kevina, burnaby)\nforall x (Harbour(x, donia) and Nucleate(donia, burnaby) -> not Nucleate(x, donia))\nNucleate(donia, burnaby) and Honduran(donia) -> not Harbour(burnaby, donia)\nNucleate(burnaby, kevina) and Treasonous(kevina) -> not Checkmate(kevina, burnaby)\nforall x (Checkmate(x, kevina) -> not Checkmate(kevina, burnaby))\nforall x (Harbour(x, donia) and not Nucleate(x, donia) -> not Treasonous(x))\n\nnot Checkmate(burnaby, donia)\n\nnot Checkmate(burnaby, donia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The reube launder the nelie. The nelie isomerise the reube. The alta is depilous. If the nelie whirlpool the reube and the reube does not see the alta then the alta does not need the nelie. If someone isomerise the reube and the reube launder the nelie then they do not see the reube. If the reube launder the nelie and the reube is lucullan then the nelie does not need the reube. If the nelie launder the alta and the alta is depilous then the alta does not like the nelie. If someone whirlpool the alta then the alta does not like the nelie. If someone isomerise the reube and they do not see the reube then they are not depilous. The reube isomerise the reube.", "logic": "\nLaunder(reube, nelie)\nIsomerise(nelie, reube)\nDepilous(alta)\nWhirlpool(nelie, reube) and not Launder(reube, alta) -> not Isomerise(alta, nelie)\nforall x (Isomerise(x, reube) and Launder(reube, nelie) -> not Launder(x, reube))\nLaunder(reube, nelie) and Lucullan(reube) -> not Isomerise(nelie, reube)\nLaunder(nelie, alta) and Depilous(alta) -> not Whirlpool(alta, nelie)\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, alta) -> not Whirlpool(alta, nelie))\nforall x (Isomerise(x, reube) and not Launder(x, reube) -> not Depilous(x))\n\nIsomerise(reube, reube)\n\nIsomerise(reube, reube) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The gerrilee goldplate the carolina. The carolina farce the gerrilee. The nevsa is appositive. If the carolina accuse the gerrilee and the gerrilee does not see the nevsa then the nevsa does not need the carolina. If someone farce the gerrilee and the gerrilee goldplate the carolina then they do not see the gerrilee. If the gerrilee goldplate the carolina and the gerrilee is subsequent then the carolina does not need the gerrilee. If the carolina goldplate the nevsa and the nevsa is appositive then the nevsa does not like the carolina. If someone accuse the nevsa then the nevsa does not like the carolina. If someone farce the gerrilee and they do not see the gerrilee then they are not appositive. The nevsa does not see the carolina.", "logic": "\nGoldplate(gerrilee, carolina)\nFarce(carolina, gerrilee)\nAppositive(nevsa)\nAccuse(carolina, gerrilee) and not Goldplate(gerrilee, nevsa) -> not Farce(nevsa, carolina)\nforall x (Farce(x, gerrilee) and Goldplate(gerrilee, carolina) -> not Goldplate(x, gerrilee))\nGoldplate(gerrilee, carolina) and Subsequent(gerrilee) -> not Farce(carolina, gerrilee)\nGoldplate(carolina, nevsa) and Appositive(nevsa) -> not Accuse(nevsa, carolina)\nforall x (Accuse(x, nevsa) -> not Accuse(nevsa, carolina))\nforall x (Farce(x, gerrilee) and not Goldplate(x, gerrilee) -> not Appositive(x))\n\nnot Goldplate(nevsa, carolina)\n\nnot Goldplate(nevsa, carolina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The ferne elapse the nikolai. The nikolai feudalize the ferne. The carmen is biconcave. If the nikolai disaccord the ferne and the ferne does not see the carmen then the carmen does not need the nikolai. If someone feudalize the ferne and the ferne elapse the nikolai then they do not see the ferne. If the ferne elapse the nikolai and the ferne is beggarly then the nikolai does not need the ferne. If the nikolai elapse the carmen and the carmen is biconcave then the carmen does not like the nikolai. If someone disaccord the carmen then the carmen does not like the nikolai. If someone feudalize the ferne and they do not see the ferne then they are not biconcave. The ferne disaccord the nikolai.", "logic": "\nElapse(ferne, nikolai)\nFeudalize(nikolai, ferne)\nBiconcave(carmen)\nDisaccord(nikolai, ferne) and not Elapse(ferne, carmen) -> not Feudalize(carmen, nikolai)\nforall x (Feudalize(x, ferne) and Elapse(ferne, nikolai) -> not Elapse(x, ferne))\nElapse(ferne, nikolai) and Beggarly(ferne) -> not Feudalize(nikolai, ferne)\nElapse(nikolai, carmen) and Biconcave(carmen) -> not Disaccord(carmen, nikolai)\nforall x (Disaccord(x, carmen) -> not Disaccord(carmen, nikolai))\nforall x (Feudalize(x, ferne) and not Elapse(x, ferne) -> not Biconcave(x))\n\nDisaccord(ferne, nikolai)\n\nDisaccord(ferne, nikolai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The nariko desiccate the harald. The harald knock the nariko. The liliane is sexist. If the harald focalise the nariko and the nariko does not see the liliane then the liliane does not need the harald. If someone knock the nariko and the nariko desiccate the harald then they do not see the nariko. If the nariko desiccate the harald and the nariko is outdoorsy then the harald does not need the nariko. If the harald desiccate the liliane and the liliane is sexist then the liliane does not like the harald. If someone focalise the liliane then the liliane does not like the harald. If someone knock the nariko and they do not see the nariko then they are not sexist. The harald does not need the liliane.", "logic": "\nDesiccate(nariko, harald)\nKnock(harald, nariko)\nSexist(liliane)\nFocalise(harald, nariko) and not Desiccate(nariko, liliane) -> not Knock(liliane, harald)\nforall x (Knock(x, nariko) and Desiccate(nariko, harald) -> not Desiccate(x, nariko))\nDesiccate(nariko, harald) and Outdoorsy(nariko) -> not Knock(harald, nariko)\nDesiccate(harald, liliane) and Sexist(liliane) -> not Focalise(liliane, harald)\nforall x (Focalise(x, liliane) -> not Focalise(liliane, harald))\nforall x (Knock(x, nariko) and not Desiccate(x, nariko) -> not Sexist(x))\n\nnot Knock(harald, liliane)\n\nnot Knock(harald, liliane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The bogart snivel the sena. The sena disenchant the bogart. The melisenda is assaultive. If the sena belly the bogart and the bogart does not see the melisenda then the melisenda does not need the sena. If someone disenchant the bogart and the bogart snivel the sena then they do not see the bogart. If the bogart snivel the sena and the bogart is unagitated then the sena does not need the bogart. If the sena snivel the melisenda and the melisenda is assaultive then the melisenda does not like the sena. If someone belly the melisenda then the melisenda does not like the sena. If someone disenchant the bogart and they do not see the bogart then they are not assaultive. The melisenda is big.", "logic": "\nSnivel(bogart, sena)\nDisenchant(sena, bogart)\nAssaultive(melisenda)\nBelly(sena, bogart) and not Snivel(bogart, melisenda) -> not Disenchant(melisenda, sena)\nforall x (Disenchant(x, bogart) and Snivel(bogart, sena) -> not Snivel(x, bogart))\nSnivel(bogart, sena) and Unagitated(bogart) -> not Disenchant(sena, bogart)\nSnivel(sena, melisenda) and Assaultive(melisenda) -> not Belly(melisenda, sena)\nforall x (Belly(x, melisenda) -> not Belly(melisenda, sena))\nforall x (Disenchant(x, bogart) and not Snivel(x, bogart) -> not Assaultive(x))\n\nBig(melisenda)\n\nBig(melisenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1516"} {"premises": "The brigida is outermost. If someone is outermost and not louvered then they are asian. If someone is asian then they are hindermost. If the brigida is outermost then the brigida is asian. If the brigida is louvered then the brigida is slicked. If the brigida is asian then the brigida is hindermost. If the brigida is slicked and the brigida is not louvered then the brigida is hindermost. If someone is hindermost and not asian then they are not slicked. If someone is hindermost and not outermost then they are slicked. The brigida is outermost.", "logic": "\nOutermost(brigida)\nforall x (Outermost(x) and not Louvered(x) -> Asian(x))\nforall x (Asian(x) -> Hindermost(x))\nOutermost(brigida) -> Asian(brigida)\nLouvered(brigida) -> Slicked(brigida)\nAsian(brigida) -> Hindermost(brigida)\nSlicked(brigida) and not Louvered(brigida) -> Hindermost(brigida)\nforall x (Hindermost(x) and not Asian(x) -> not Slicked(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) and not Outermost(x) -> Slicked(x))\n\nOutermost(brigida)\n\ntherefore Outermost(brigida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The siward is colossal. If someone is colossal and not meaningful then they are aperient. If someone is aperient then they are poetical. If the siward is colossal then the siward is aperient. If the siward is meaningful then the siward is avifaunal. If the siward is aperient then the siward is poetical. If the siward is avifaunal and the siward is not meaningful then the siward is poetical. If someone is poetical and not aperient then they are not avifaunal. If someone is poetical and not colossal then they are avifaunal. The siward is not colossal.", "logic": "\nColossal(siward)\nforall x (Colossal(x) and not Meaningful(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Aperient(x) -> Poetical(x))\nColossal(siward) -> Aperient(siward)\nMeaningful(siward) -> Avifaunal(siward)\nAperient(siward) -> Poetical(siward)\nAvifaunal(siward) and not Meaningful(siward) -> Poetical(siward)\nforall x (Poetical(x) and not Aperient(x) -> not Avifaunal(x))\nforall x (Poetical(x) and not Colossal(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\n\nnot Colossal(siward)\n\ntherefore Colossal(siward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The cathee is maoist. If someone is maoist and not syncarpous then they are rockbound. If someone is rockbound then they are arresting. If the cathee is maoist then the cathee is rockbound. If the cathee is syncarpous then the cathee is plush. If the cathee is rockbound then the cathee is arresting. If the cathee is plush and the cathee is not syncarpous then the cathee is arresting. If someone is arresting and not rockbound then they are not plush. If someone is arresting and not maoist then they are plush. The cathee is rockbound.", "logic": "\nMaoist(cathee)\nforall x (Maoist(x) and not Syncarpous(x) -> Rockbound(x))\nforall x (Rockbound(x) -> Arresting(x))\nMaoist(cathee) -> Rockbound(cathee)\nSyncarpous(cathee) -> Plush(cathee)\nRockbound(cathee) -> Arresting(cathee)\nPlush(cathee) and not Syncarpous(cathee) -> Arresting(cathee)\nforall x (Arresting(x) and not Rockbound(x) -> not Plush(x))\nforall x (Arresting(x) and not Maoist(x) -> Plush(x))\n\nRockbound(cathee)\n\nMaoist(cathee) and Maoist(cathee) -> Rockbound(cathee) -> therefore Rockbound(cathee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The adore is unsalable. If someone is unsalable and not peeled then they are ongoing. If someone is ongoing then they are prurient. If the adore is unsalable then the adore is ongoing. If the adore is peeled then the adore is dopey. If the adore is ongoing then the adore is prurient. If the adore is dopey and the adore is not peeled then the adore is prurient. If someone is prurient and not ongoing then they are not dopey. If someone is prurient and not unsalable then they are dopey. The adore is not ongoing.", "logic": "\nUnsalable(adore)\nforall x (Unsalable(x) and not Peeled(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Prurient(x))\nUnsalable(adore) -> Ongoing(adore)\nPeeled(adore) -> Dopey(adore)\nOngoing(adore) -> Prurient(adore)\nDopey(adore) and not Peeled(adore) -> Prurient(adore)\nforall x (Prurient(x) and not Ongoing(x) -> not Dopey(x))\nforall x (Prurient(x) and not Unsalable(x) -> Dopey(x))\n\nnot Ongoing(adore)\n\nUnsalable(adore) and Unsalable(adore) -> Ongoing(adore) -> therefore Ongoing(adore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The vernor is exacting. If someone is exacting and not alvine then they are doltish. If someone is doltish then they are napping. If the vernor is exacting then the vernor is doltish. If the vernor is alvine then the vernor is fledgeless. If the vernor is doltish then the vernor is napping. If the vernor is fledgeless and the vernor is not alvine then the vernor is napping. If someone is napping and not doltish then they are not fledgeless. If someone is napping and not exacting then they are fledgeless. The vernor is napping.", "logic": "\nExacting(vernor)\nforall x (Exacting(x) and not Alvine(x) -> Doltish(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) -> Napping(x))\nExacting(vernor) -> Doltish(vernor)\nAlvine(vernor) -> Fledgeless(vernor)\nDoltish(vernor) -> Napping(vernor)\nFledgeless(vernor) and not Alvine(vernor) -> Napping(vernor)\nforall x (Napping(x) and not Doltish(x) -> not Fledgeless(x))\nforall x (Napping(x) and not Exacting(x) -> Fledgeless(x))\n\nNapping(vernor)\n\nExacting(vernor) and Exacting(vernor) -> Doltish(vernor) -> therefore Doltish(vernor) Doltish(vernor) and forall x (Doltish(x) -> Napping(x)) -> therefore Napping(vernor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The anissa is topmost. If someone is topmost and not hurt then they are unalike. If someone is unalike then they are enclosed. If the anissa is topmost then the anissa is unalike. If the anissa is hurt then the anissa is overloaded. If the anissa is unalike then the anissa is enclosed. If the anissa is overloaded and the anissa is not hurt then the anissa is enclosed. If someone is enclosed and not unalike then they are not overloaded. If someone is enclosed and not topmost then they are overloaded. The anissa is not enclosed.", "logic": "\nTopmost(anissa)\nforall x (Topmost(x) and not Hurt(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Unalike(x) -> Enclosed(x))\nTopmost(anissa) -> Unalike(anissa)\nHurt(anissa) -> Overloaded(anissa)\nUnalike(anissa) -> Enclosed(anissa)\nOverloaded(anissa) and not Hurt(anissa) -> Enclosed(anissa)\nforall x (Enclosed(x) and not Unalike(x) -> not Overloaded(x))\nforall x (Enclosed(x) and not Topmost(x) -> Overloaded(x))\n\nnot Enclosed(anissa)\n\nTopmost(anissa) and Topmost(anissa) -> Unalike(anissa) -> therefore Unalike(anissa) Unalike(anissa) and forall x (Unalike(x) -> Enclosed(x)) -> therefore Enclosed(anissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The emyle is another. If someone is another and not discharged then they are globular. If someone is globular then they are slick. If the emyle is another then the emyle is globular. If the emyle is discharged then the emyle is marketable. If the emyle is globular then the emyle is slick. If the emyle is marketable and the emyle is not discharged then the emyle is slick. If someone is slick and not globular then they are not marketable. If someone is slick and not another then they are marketable. The emyle is not marketable.", "logic": "\nAnother(emyle)\nforall x (Another(x) and not Discharged(x) -> Globular(x))\nforall x (Globular(x) -> Slick(x))\nAnother(emyle) -> Globular(emyle)\nDischarged(emyle) -> Marketable(emyle)\nGlobular(emyle) -> Slick(emyle)\nMarketable(emyle) and not Discharged(emyle) -> Slick(emyle)\nforall x (Slick(x) and not Globular(x) -> not Marketable(x))\nforall x (Slick(x) and not Another(x) -> Marketable(x))\n\nnot Marketable(emyle)\n\nDischarged(emyle) -> Marketable(emyle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The rubi is pale. If someone is pale and not commutable then they are extramural. If someone is extramural then they are indictable. If the rubi is pale then the rubi is extramural. If the rubi is commutable then the rubi is comparable. If the rubi is extramural then the rubi is indictable. If the rubi is comparable and the rubi is not commutable then the rubi is indictable. If someone is indictable and not extramural then they are not comparable. If someone is indictable and not pale then they are comparable. The rubi sees the rubi.", "logic": "\nPale(rubi)\nforall x (Pale(x) and not Commutable(x) -> Extramural(x))\nforall x (Extramural(x) -> Indictable(x))\nPale(rubi) -> Extramural(rubi)\nCommutable(rubi) -> Comparable(rubi)\nExtramural(rubi) -> Indictable(rubi)\nComparable(rubi) and not Commutable(rubi) -> Indictable(rubi)\nforall x (Indictable(x) and not Extramural(x) -> not Comparable(x))\nforall x (Indictable(x) and not Pale(x) -> Comparable(x))\n\nSees(rubi, rubi)\n\nSees(rubi, rubi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The petronia is slighting. If someone is slighting and not prodromic then they are isotopic. If someone is isotopic then they are sozzled. If the petronia is slighting then the petronia is isotopic. If the petronia is prodromic then the petronia is trilateral. If the petronia is isotopic then the petronia is sozzled. If the petronia is trilateral and the petronia is not prodromic then the petronia is sozzled. If someone is sozzled and not isotopic then they are not trilateral. If someone is sozzled and not slighting then they are trilateral. The petronia does not visit the petronia.", "logic": "\nSlighting(petronia)\nforall x (Slighting(x) and not Prodromic(x) -> Isotopic(x))\nforall x (Isotopic(x) -> Sozzled(x))\nSlighting(petronia) -> Isotopic(petronia)\nProdromic(petronia) -> Trilateral(petronia)\nIsotopic(petronia) -> Sozzled(petronia)\nTrilateral(petronia) and not Prodromic(petronia) -> Sozzled(petronia)\nforall x (Sozzled(x) and not Isotopic(x) -> not Trilateral(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) and not Slighting(x) -> Trilateral(x))\n\nnot Visits(petronia, petronia)\n\nnot Visits(petronia, petronia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "The nick is couth. If someone is couth and not univalent then they are cuticular. If someone is cuticular then they are gauzy. If the nick is couth then the nick is cuticular. If the nick is univalent then the nick is consensual. If the nick is cuticular then the nick is gauzy. If the nick is consensual and the nick is not univalent then the nick is gauzy. If someone is gauzy and not cuticular then they are not consensual. If someone is gauzy and not couth then they are consensual. The nick is univalent.", "logic": "\nCouth(nick)\nforall x (Couth(x) and not Univalent(x) -> Cuticular(x))\nforall x (Cuticular(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nCouth(nick) -> Cuticular(nick)\nUnivalent(nick) -> Consensual(nick)\nCuticular(nick) -> Gauzy(nick)\nConsensual(nick) and not Univalent(nick) -> Gauzy(nick)\nforall x (Gauzy(x) and not Cuticular(x) -> not Consensual(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) and not Couth(x) -> Consensual(x))\n\nUnivalent(nick)\n\nUnivalent(nick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-346"} {"premises": "Adolphe is humanist. Madge is footless. All jealous, footless things are wagnerian. Blue things are naughty. All humanist, naughty things are alkahestic. All naughty things are jealous. If something is footless then it is jealous. All jealous, humanist things are naughty. If something is wagnerian then it is jealous. If Madge is humanist and Madge is footless then Madge is naughty. Madge is footless.", "logic": "\nHumanist(adolphe)\nFootless(madge)\nforall x (Jealous(x) and Footless(x) -> Wagnerian(x))\nforall x (Roadless(x) -> Naughty(x))\nforall x (Humanist(x) and Naughty(x) -> Alkahestic(x))\nforall x (Naughty(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Footless(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Jealous(x) and Humanist(x) -> Naughty(x))\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) -> Jealous(x))\nHumanist(madge) and Footless(madge) -> Naughty(madge)\n\nFootless(madge)\n\ntherefore Footless(madge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Melitta is lymphoid. Niccolo is bossy. All narcotised, bossy things are boned. Blue things are barred. All lymphoid, barred things are uncousinly. All barred things are narcotised. If something is bossy then it is narcotised. All narcotised, lymphoid things are barred. If something is boned then it is narcotised. If Niccolo is lymphoid and Niccolo is bossy then Niccolo is barred. Niccolo is not bossy.", "logic": "\nLymphoid(melitta)\nBossy(niccolo)\nforall x (Narcotised(x) and Bossy(x) -> Boned(x))\nforall x (Joyless(x) -> Barred(x))\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) and Barred(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\nforall x (Barred(x) -> Narcotised(x))\nforall x (Bossy(x) -> Narcotised(x))\nforall x (Narcotised(x) and Lymphoid(x) -> Barred(x))\nforall x (Boned(x) -> Narcotised(x))\nLymphoid(niccolo) and Bossy(niccolo) -> Barred(niccolo)\n\nnot Bossy(niccolo)\n\ntherefore Bossy(niccolo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Tan is crank. Virginie is common. All rhodesian, common things are straggly. Blue things are jumpy. All crank, jumpy things are tipped. All jumpy things are rhodesian. If something is common then it is rhodesian. All rhodesian, crank things are jumpy. If something is straggly then it is rhodesian. If Virginie is crank and Virginie is common then Virginie is jumpy. Virginie is rhodesian.", "logic": "\nCrank(tan)\nCommon(virginie)\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) and Common(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Jumpy(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) and Jumpy(x) -> Tipped(x))\nforall x (Jumpy(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\nforall x (Common(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) and Crank(x) -> Jumpy(x))\nforall x (Straggly(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\nCrank(virginie) and Common(virginie) -> Jumpy(virginie)\n\nRhodesian(virginie)\n\nCommon(virginie) and forall x (Common(x) -> Rhodesian(x)) -> therefore Rhodesian(virginie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Joanie is garish. Joye is bearing. All polysemous, bearing things are roman. Blue things are rifled. All garish, rifled things are nude. All rifled things are polysemous. If something is bearing then it is polysemous. All polysemous, garish things are rifled. If something is roman then it is polysemous. If Joye is garish and Joye is bearing then Joye is rifled. Joye is not polysemous.", "logic": "\nGarish(joanie)\nBearing(joye)\nforall x (Polysemous(x) and Bearing(x) -> Roman(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Rifled(x))\nforall x (Garish(x) and Rifled(x) -> Nude(x))\nforall x (Rifled(x) -> Polysemous(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Polysemous(x))\nforall x (Polysemous(x) and Garish(x) -> Rifled(x))\nforall x (Roman(x) -> Polysemous(x))\nGarish(joye) and Bearing(joye) -> Rifled(joye)\n\nnot Polysemous(joye)\n\nBearing(joye) and forall x (Bearing(x) -> Polysemous(x)) -> therefore Polysemous(joye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Bela is overripe. Quintina is peaceable. All acerbic, peaceable things are meritless. Blue things are fluent. All overripe, fluent things are taxing. All fluent things are acerbic. If something is peaceable then it is acerbic. All acerbic, overripe things are fluent. If something is meritless then it is acerbic. If Quintina is overripe and Quintina is peaceable then Quintina is fluent. Quintina is meritless.", "logic": "\nOverripe(bela)\nPeaceable(quintina)\nforall x (Acerbic(x) and Peaceable(x) -> Meritless(x))\nforall x (Endurable(x) -> Fluent(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) and Fluent(x) -> Taxing(x))\nforall x (Fluent(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nforall x (Peaceable(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) and Overripe(x) -> Fluent(x))\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nOverripe(quintina) and Peaceable(quintina) -> Fluent(quintina)\n\nMeritless(quintina)\n\nPeaceable(quintina) and forall x (Peaceable(x) -> Acerbic(x)) -> therefore Acerbic(quintina) Acerbic(quintina) and Peaceable(quintina) and forall x (Acerbic(x) and Peaceable(x) -> Meritless(x)) -> therefore Meritless(quintina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Piet is menstrual. Eran is apodal. All left, apodal things are loathsome. Blue things are masterful. All menstrual, masterful things are bribable. All masterful things are left. If something is apodal then it is left. All left, menstrual things are masterful. If something is loathsome then it is left. If Eran is menstrual and Eran is apodal then Eran is masterful. Eran is not loathsome.", "logic": "\nMenstrual(piet)\nApodal(eran)\nforall x (Left(x) and Apodal(x) -> Loathsome(x))\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Menstrual(x) and Masterful(x) -> Bribable(x))\nforall x (Masterful(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Apodal(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Left(x) and Menstrual(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Loathsome(x) -> Left(x))\nMenstrual(eran) and Apodal(eran) -> Masterful(eran)\n\nnot Loathsome(eran)\n\nApodal(eran) and forall x (Apodal(x) -> Left(x)) -> therefore Left(eran) Left(eran) and Apodal(eran) and forall x (Left(x) and Apodal(x) -> Loathsome(x)) -> therefore Loathsome(eran)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Sammie is vesicant. Pablo is unposed. All saddled, unposed things are paternal. Blue things are crosstown. All vesicant, crosstown things are pretty. All crosstown things are saddled. If something is unposed then it is saddled. All saddled, vesicant things are crosstown. If something is paternal then it is saddled. If Pablo is vesicant and Pablo is unposed then Pablo is crosstown. Pablo is not pretty.", "logic": "\nVesicant(sammie)\nUnposed(pablo)\nforall x (Saddled(x) and Unposed(x) -> Paternal(x))\nforall x (Mysophobic(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Vesicant(x) and Crosstown(x) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Saddled(x) and Vesicant(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> Saddled(x))\nVesicant(pablo) and Unposed(pablo) -> Crosstown(pablo)\n\nnot Pretty(pablo)\n\nforall x (Vesicant(x) and Crosstown(x) -> Pretty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Ilyssa is analytic. Dawson is embedded. All boneless, embedded things are scrubbed. Blue things are motherlike. All analytic, motherlike things are bullying. All motherlike things are boneless. If something is embedded then it is boneless. All boneless, analytic things are motherlike. If something is scrubbed then it is boneless. If Dawson is analytic and Dawson is embedded then Dawson is motherlike. Dawson is motherlike.", "logic": "\nAnalytic(ilyssa)\nEmbedded(dawson)\nforall x (Boneless(x) and Embedded(x) -> Scrubbed(x))\nforall x (Sleazy(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Analytic(x) and Motherlike(x) -> Bullying(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Boneless(x))\nforall x (Embedded(x) -> Boneless(x))\nforall x (Boneless(x) and Analytic(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) -> Boneless(x))\nAnalytic(dawson) and Embedded(dawson) -> Motherlike(dawson)\n\nMotherlike(dawson)\n\nforall x (Sleazy(x) -> Motherlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Joselyn is biform. Karlee is laudable. All insolvable, laudable things are cultured. Blue things are rounded. All biform, rounded things are eutrophic. All rounded things are insolvable. If something is laudable then it is insolvable. All insolvable, biform things are rounded. If something is cultured then it is insolvable. If Karlee is biform and Karlee is laudable then Karlee is rounded. Joselyn is not cultured.", "logic": "\nBiform(joselyn)\nLaudable(karlee)\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Laudable(x) -> Cultured(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) -> Rounded(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) and Rounded(x) -> Eutrophic(x))\nforall x (Rounded(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Biform(x) -> Rounded(x))\nforall x (Cultured(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nBiform(karlee) and Laudable(karlee) -> Rounded(karlee)\n\nnot Cultured(joselyn)\n\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Laudable(x) -> Cultured(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Kylila is diverse. Shandy is porcine. All eastside, porcine things are unripe. Blue things are discoid. All diverse, discoid things are puissant. All discoid things are eastside. If something is porcine then it is eastside. All eastside, diverse things are discoid. If something is unripe then it is eastside. If Shandy is diverse and Shandy is porcine then Shandy is discoid. Shandy is diverse.", "logic": "\nDiverse(kylila)\nPorcine(shandy)\nforall x (Eastside(x) and Porcine(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Humiliated(x) -> Discoid(x))\nforall x (Diverse(x) and Discoid(x) -> Puissant(x))\nforall x (Discoid(x) -> Eastside(x))\nforall x (Porcine(x) -> Eastside(x))\nforall x (Eastside(x) and Diverse(x) -> Discoid(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) -> Eastside(x))\nDiverse(shandy) and Porcine(shandy) -> Discoid(shandy)\n\nDiverse(shandy)\n\nDiverse(shandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Ashely is birken. George is entranced. All undying, entranced things are shoaly. Blue things are avascular. All birken, avascular things are silent. All avascular things are undying. If something is entranced then it is undying. All undying, birken things are avascular. If something is shoaly then it is undying. If George is birken and George is entranced then George is avascular. George is not titular.", "logic": "\nBirken(ashely)\nEntranced(george)\nforall x (Undying(x) and Entranced(x) -> Shoaly(x))\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Avascular(x))\nforall x (Birken(x) and Avascular(x) -> Silent(x))\nforall x (Avascular(x) -> Undying(x))\nforall x (Entranced(x) -> Undying(x))\nforall x (Undying(x) and Birken(x) -> Avascular(x))\nforall x (Shoaly(x) -> Undying(x))\nBirken(george) and Entranced(george) -> Avascular(george)\n\nnot Titular(george)\n\nnot Titular(george) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "Clint is sighted. Hermon is chelate. All rejoicing, chelate things are uniate. Blue things are inhibited. All sighted, inhibited things are angry. All inhibited things are rejoicing. If something is chelate then it is rejoicing. All rejoicing, sighted things are inhibited. If something is uniate then it is rejoicing. If Hermon is sighted and Hermon is chelate then Hermon is inhibited. Clint is chelate.", "logic": "\nSighted(clint)\nChelate(hermon)\nforall x (Rejoicing(x) and Chelate(x) -> Uniate(x))\nforall x (Split(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Sighted(x) and Inhibited(x) -> Angry(x))\nforall x (Inhibited(x) -> Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x) -> Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Rejoicing(x) and Sighted(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Uniate(x) -> Rejoicing(x))\nSighted(hermon) and Chelate(hermon) -> Inhibited(hermon)\n\nChelate(clint)\n\nChelate(clint) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1285"} {"premises": "The thain waterproof the carlotta. The carlotta is bats. The mandi waterproof the terrie. The terrie is enticing. If someone waterproof the mandi and the mandi waterproof the carlotta then they chase the mandi. If someone waterproof the carlotta then they chase the terrie. If someone realise the carlotta and the carlotta realise the thain then they need the terrie. If someone realise the carlotta and they chase the carlotta then they need the mandi. If someone is enticing then they chase the mandi. If someone powerwash the mandi then the mandi is verbalized. The thain waterproof the carlotta.", "logic": "\nWaterproof(thain, carlotta)\nBats(carlotta)\nWaterproof(mandi, terrie)\nEnticing(terrie)\nforall x (Waterproof(x, mandi) and Waterproof(mandi, carlotta) -> Powerwash(x, mandi))\nforall x (Waterproof(x, carlotta) -> Powerwash(x, terrie))\nforall x (Realise(x, carlotta) and Realise(carlotta, thain) -> Waterproof(x, terrie))\nforall x (Realise(x, carlotta) and Powerwash(x, carlotta) -> Waterproof(x, mandi))\nforall x (Enticing(x) -> Powerwash(x, mandi))\nforall x (Powerwash(x, mandi) -> Verbalized(mandi))\n\nWaterproof(thain, carlotta)\n\ntherefore Waterproof(thain, carlotta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The godfrey tube the donn. The donn is upended. The elias tube the candie. The candie is objective. If someone tube the elias and the elias tube the donn then they chase the elias. If someone tube the donn then they chase the candie. If someone supplicate the donn and the donn supplicate the godfrey then they need the candie. If someone supplicate the donn and they chase the donn then they need the elias. If someone is objective then they chase the elias. If someone customise the elias then the elias is adoptable. The godfrey does not need the donn.", "logic": "\nTube(godfrey, donn)\nUpended(donn)\nTube(elias, candie)\nObjective(candie)\nforall x (Tube(x, elias) and Tube(elias, donn) -> Customise(x, elias))\nforall x (Tube(x, donn) -> Customise(x, candie))\nforall x (Supplicate(x, donn) and Supplicate(donn, godfrey) -> Tube(x, candie))\nforall x (Supplicate(x, donn) and Customise(x, donn) -> Tube(x, elias))\nforall x (Objective(x) -> Customise(x, elias))\nforall x (Customise(x, elias) -> Adoptable(elias))\n\nnot Tube(godfrey, donn)\n\ntherefore Tube(godfrey, donn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The elayne interject the hugh. The hugh is coquettish. The kial interject the dory. The dory is paramount. If someone interject the kial and the kial interject the hugh then they chase the kial. If someone interject the hugh then they chase the dory. If someone crook the hugh and the hugh crook the elayne then they need the dory. If someone crook the hugh and they chase the hugh then they need the kial. If someone is paramount then they chase the kial. If someone tack the kial then the kial is leeward. The elayne tack the dory.", "logic": "\nInterject(elayne, hugh)\nCoquettish(hugh)\nInterject(kial, dory)\nParamount(dory)\nforall x (Interject(x, kial) and Interject(kial, hugh) -> Tack(x, kial))\nforall x (Interject(x, hugh) -> Tack(x, dory))\nforall x (Crook(x, hugh) and Crook(hugh, elayne) -> Interject(x, dory))\nforall x (Crook(x, hugh) and Tack(x, hugh) -> Interject(x, kial))\nforall x (Paramount(x) -> Tack(x, kial))\nforall x (Tack(x, kial) -> Leeward(kial))\n\nTack(elayne, dory)\n\nInterject(elayne, hugh) and forall x (Interject(x, hugh) -> Tack(x, dory)) -> therefore Tack(elayne, dory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The hezekiah refute the lanna. The lanna is tending. The jehu refute the tarra. The tarra is humanlike. If someone refute the jehu and the jehu refute the lanna then they chase the jehu. If someone refute the lanna then they chase the tarra. If someone conk the lanna and the lanna conk the hezekiah then they need the tarra. If someone conk the lanna and they chase the lanna then they need the jehu. If someone is humanlike then they chase the jehu. If someone bleat the jehu then the jehu is terminal. The hezekiah does not chase the tarra.", "logic": "\nRefute(hezekiah, lanna)\nTending(lanna)\nRefute(jehu, tarra)\nHumanlike(tarra)\nforall x (Refute(x, jehu) and Refute(jehu, lanna) -> Bleat(x, jehu))\nforall x (Refute(x, lanna) -> Bleat(x, tarra))\nforall x (Conk(x, lanna) and Conk(lanna, hezekiah) -> Refute(x, tarra))\nforall x (Conk(x, lanna) and Bleat(x, lanna) -> Refute(x, jehu))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) -> Bleat(x, jehu))\nforall x (Bleat(x, jehu) -> Terminal(jehu))\n\nnot Bleat(hezekiah, tarra)\n\nRefute(hezekiah, lanna) and forall x (Refute(x, lanna) -> Bleat(x, tarra)) -> therefore Bleat(hezekiah, tarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The holli abrogate the rena. The rena is wrathful. The brock abrogate the jerrold. The jerrold is unlined. If someone abrogate the brock and the brock abrogate the rena then they chase the brock. If someone abrogate the rena then they chase the jerrold. If someone enforce the rena and the rena enforce the holli then they need the jerrold. If someone enforce the rena and they chase the rena then they need the brock. If someone is unlined then they chase the brock. If someone fraternise the brock then the brock is cocksure. The brock is cocksure.", "logic": "\nAbrogate(holli, rena)\nWrathful(rena)\nAbrogate(brock, jerrold)\nUnlined(jerrold)\nforall x (Abrogate(x, brock) and Abrogate(brock, rena) -> Fraternise(x, brock))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, rena) -> Fraternise(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Enforce(x, rena) and Enforce(rena, holli) -> Abrogate(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Enforce(x, rena) and Fraternise(x, rena) -> Abrogate(x, brock))\nforall x (Unlined(x) -> Fraternise(x, brock))\nforall x (Fraternise(x, brock) -> Cocksure(brock))\n\nCocksure(brock)\n\nUnlined(jerrold) and forall x (Unlined(x) -> Fraternise(x, brock)) -> therefore Fraternise(jerrold, brock) Fraternise(jerrold, brock) and forall x (Fraternise(x, brock) -> Cocksure(brock)) -> therefore Cocksure(brock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The napoleon ticktack the winna. The winna is geocentric. The vivian ticktack the merl. The merl is confluent. If someone ticktack the vivian and the vivian ticktack the winna then they chase the vivian. If someone ticktack the winna then they chase the merl. If someone geminate the winna and the winna geminate the napoleon then they need the merl. If someone geminate the winna and they chase the winna then they need the vivian. If someone is confluent then they chase the vivian. If someone ignite the vivian then the vivian is salving. The vivian is not salving.", "logic": "\nTicktack(napoleon, winna)\nGeocentric(winna)\nTicktack(vivian, merl)\nConfluent(merl)\nforall x (Ticktack(x, vivian) and Ticktack(vivian, winna) -> Ignite(x, vivian))\nforall x (Ticktack(x, winna) -> Ignite(x, merl))\nforall x (Geminate(x, winna) and Geminate(winna, napoleon) -> Ticktack(x, merl))\nforall x (Geminate(x, winna) and Ignite(x, winna) -> Ticktack(x, vivian))\nforall x (Confluent(x) -> Ignite(x, vivian))\nforall x (Ignite(x, vivian) -> Salving(vivian))\n\nnot Salving(vivian)\n\nConfluent(merl) and forall x (Confluent(x) -> Ignite(x, vivian)) -> therefore Ignite(merl, vivian) Ignite(merl, vivian) and forall x (Ignite(x, vivian) -> Salving(vivian)) -> therefore Salving(vivian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The tirrell reseed the jaine. The jaine is skew. The ginnifer reseed the cariotta. The cariotta is bumbling. If someone reseed the ginnifer and the ginnifer reseed the jaine then they chase the ginnifer. If someone reseed the jaine then they chase the cariotta. If someone benefit the jaine and the jaine benefit the tirrell then they need the cariotta. If someone benefit the jaine and they chase the jaine then they need the ginnifer. If someone is bumbling then they chase the ginnifer. If someone stridulate the ginnifer then the ginnifer is bicuspid. The ginnifer does not chase the cariotta.", "logic": "\nReseed(tirrell, jaine)\nSkew(jaine)\nReseed(ginnifer, cariotta)\nBumbling(cariotta)\nforall x (Reseed(x, ginnifer) and Reseed(ginnifer, jaine) -> Stridulate(x, ginnifer))\nforall x (Reseed(x, jaine) -> Stridulate(x, cariotta))\nforall x (Benefit(x, jaine) and Benefit(jaine, tirrell) -> Reseed(x, cariotta))\nforall x (Benefit(x, jaine) and Stridulate(x, jaine) -> Reseed(x, ginnifer))\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Stridulate(x, ginnifer))\nforall x (Stridulate(x, ginnifer) -> Bicuspid(ginnifer))\n\nnot Stridulate(ginnifer, cariotta)\n\nforall x (Reseed(x, jaine) -> Stridulate(x, cariotta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The leesa graph the waneta. The waneta is ovular. The ellis graph the ahmad. The ahmad is lossy. If someone graph the ellis and the ellis graph the waneta then they chase the ellis. If someone graph the waneta then they chase the ahmad. If someone involve the waneta and the waneta involve the leesa then they need the ahmad. If someone involve the waneta and they chase the waneta then they need the ellis. If someone is lossy then they chase the ellis. If someone site the ellis then the ellis is cryonic. The ahmad site the ahmad.", "logic": "\nGraph(leesa, waneta)\nOvular(waneta)\nGraph(ellis, ahmad)\nLossy(ahmad)\nforall x (Graph(x, ellis) and Graph(ellis, waneta) -> Site(x, ellis))\nforall x (Graph(x, waneta) -> Site(x, ahmad))\nforall x (Involve(x, waneta) and Involve(waneta, leesa) -> Graph(x, ahmad))\nforall x (Involve(x, waneta) and Site(x, waneta) -> Graph(x, ellis))\nforall x (Lossy(x) -> Site(x, ellis))\nforall x (Site(x, ellis) -> Cryonic(ellis))\n\nSite(ahmad, ahmad)\n\nforall x (Graph(x, waneta) -> Site(x, ahmad)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The nellie emerge the pepi. The pepi is unsanded. The mohamed emerge the bonnee. The bonnee is narcotized. If someone emerge the mohamed and the mohamed emerge the pepi then they chase the mohamed. If someone emerge the pepi then they chase the bonnee. If someone elope the pepi and the pepi elope the nellie then they need the bonnee. If someone elope the pepi and they chase the pepi then they need the mohamed. If someone is narcotized then they chase the mohamed. If someone benefit the mohamed then the mohamed is duple. The nellie does not chase the mohamed.", "logic": "\nEmerge(nellie, pepi)\nUnsanded(pepi)\nEmerge(mohamed, bonnee)\nNarcotized(bonnee)\nforall x (Emerge(x, mohamed) and Emerge(mohamed, pepi) -> Benefit(x, mohamed))\nforall x (Emerge(x, pepi) -> Benefit(x, bonnee))\nforall x (Elope(x, pepi) and Elope(pepi, nellie) -> Emerge(x, bonnee))\nforall x (Elope(x, pepi) and Benefit(x, pepi) -> Emerge(x, mohamed))\nforall x (Narcotized(x) -> Benefit(x, mohamed))\nforall x (Benefit(x, mohamed) -> Duple(mohamed))\n\nnot Benefit(nellie, mohamed)\n\nforall x (Emerge(x, mohamed) and Emerge(mohamed, pepi) -> Benefit(x, mohamed)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The genny fleet the vonnie. The vonnie is unopened. The merralee fleet the katharyn. The katharyn is deciphered. If someone fleet the merralee and the merralee fleet the vonnie then they chase the merralee. If someone fleet the vonnie then they chase the katharyn. If someone seize the vonnie and the vonnie seize the genny then they need the katharyn. If someone seize the vonnie and they chase the vonnie then they need the merralee. If someone is deciphered then they chase the merralee. If someone refurbish the merralee then the merralee is baptismal. The katharyn seize the genny.", "logic": "\nFleet(genny, vonnie)\nUnopened(vonnie)\nFleet(merralee, katharyn)\nDeciphered(katharyn)\nforall x (Fleet(x, merralee) and Fleet(merralee, vonnie) -> Refurbish(x, merralee))\nforall x (Fleet(x, vonnie) -> Refurbish(x, katharyn))\nforall x (Seize(x, vonnie) and Seize(vonnie, genny) -> Fleet(x, katharyn))\nforall x (Seize(x, vonnie) and Refurbish(x, vonnie) -> Fleet(x, merralee))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) -> Refurbish(x, merralee))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, merralee) -> Baptismal(merralee))\n\nSeize(katharyn, genny)\n\nSeize(katharyn, genny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The fannie checkmate the hannis. The hannis is airtight. The brigid checkmate the mandie. The mandie is adulterate. If someone checkmate the brigid and the brigid checkmate the hannis then they chase the brigid. If someone checkmate the hannis then they chase the mandie. If someone reassure the hannis and the hannis reassure the fannie then they need the mandie. If someone reassure the hannis and they chase the hannis then they need the brigid. If someone is adulterate then they chase the brigid. If someone endue the brigid then the brigid is banned. The mandie does not like the mandie.", "logic": "\nCheckmate(fannie, hannis)\nAirtight(hannis)\nCheckmate(brigid, mandie)\nAdulterate(mandie)\nforall x (Checkmate(x, brigid) and Checkmate(brigid, hannis) -> Endue(x, brigid))\nforall x (Checkmate(x, hannis) -> Endue(x, mandie))\nforall x (Reassure(x, hannis) and Reassure(hannis, fannie) -> Checkmate(x, mandie))\nforall x (Reassure(x, hannis) and Endue(x, hannis) -> Checkmate(x, brigid))\nforall x (Adulterate(x) -> Endue(x, brigid))\nforall x (Endue(x, brigid) -> Banned(brigid))\n\nnot Reassure(mandie, mandie)\n\nnot Reassure(mandie, mandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The riva diffuse the harv. The harv is omniscient. The wells diffuse the myrtice. The myrtice is guileless. If someone diffuse the wells and the wells diffuse the harv then they chase the wells. If someone diffuse the harv then they chase the myrtice. If someone mushroom the harv and the harv mushroom the riva then they need the myrtice. If someone mushroom the harv and they chase the harv then they need the wells. If someone is guileless then they chase the wells. If someone decalcify the wells then the wells is vacuous. The riva is omniscient.", "logic": "\nDiffuse(riva, harv)\nOmniscient(harv)\nDiffuse(wells, myrtice)\nGuileless(myrtice)\nforall x (Diffuse(x, wells) and Diffuse(wells, harv) -> Decalcify(x, wells))\nforall x (Diffuse(x, harv) -> Decalcify(x, myrtice))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, harv) and Mushroom(harv, riva) -> Diffuse(x, myrtice))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, harv) and Decalcify(x, harv) -> Diffuse(x, wells))\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> Decalcify(x, wells))\nforall x (Decalcify(x, wells) -> Vacuous(wells))\n\nOmniscient(riva)\n\nOmniscient(riva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1103"} {"premises": "The benjie is reassured. The benjie does not like the jessie. The jessie exuviate the alisa. The jessie pour the alisa. The alisa exuviate the benjie. The alisa exuviate the binni. The alisa is drowsing. The alisa is poriferous. The alisa recommence the benjie. The binni is poriferous. If something is drowsing and it does not chase the benjie then it does not eat the alisa. Kind things are mated. If something recommence the alisa and the alisa exuviate the binni then the binni is not methylated. If something is mated then it is not methylated. If something pour the alisa and it does not chase the benjie then it does not eat the benjie. If something is poriferous and it exuviate the jessie then it recommence the benjie. If the binni recommence the jessie then the binni is poriferous. If the jessie does not chase the benjie then the benjie is reassured. The benjie does not like the jessie.", "logic": "\nReassured(benjie)\nnot Recommence(benjie, jessie)\nExuviate(jessie, alisa)\nPour(jessie, alisa)\nExuviate(alisa, benjie)\nExuviate(alisa, binni)\nDrowsing(alisa)\nPoriferous(alisa)\nRecommence(alisa, benjie)\nPoriferous(binni)\nforall x (Drowsing(x) and not Exuviate(x, benjie) -> not Pour(x, alisa))\nforall x (Drowsing(x) -> Mated(x))\nforall x (Recommence(x, alisa) and Exuviate(alisa, binni) -> not Methylated(binni))\nforall x (Mated(x) -> not Methylated(x))\nforall x (Pour(x, alisa) and not Exuviate(x, benjie) -> not Pour(x, benjie))\nforall x (Poriferous(x) and Exuviate(x, jessie) -> Recommence(x, benjie))\nRecommence(binni, jessie) -> Poriferous(binni)\nnot Exuviate(jessie, benjie) -> Reassured(benjie)\n\nnot Recommence(benjie, jessie)\n\ntherefore not Recommence(benjie, jessie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The samara is leathered. The samara does not like the annetta. The annetta roughcast the beilul. The annetta porter the beilul. The beilul roughcast the samara. The beilul roughcast the ethelda. The beilul is dummy. The beilul is freehanded. The beilul abbreviate the samara. The ethelda is freehanded. If something is dummy and it does not chase the samara then it does not eat the beilul. Kind things are southward. If something abbreviate the beilul and the beilul roughcast the ethelda then the ethelda is not pukka. If something is southward then it is not pukka. If something porter the beilul and it does not chase the samara then it does not eat the samara. If something is freehanded and it roughcast the annetta then it abbreviate the samara. If the ethelda abbreviate the annetta then the ethelda is freehanded. If the annetta does not chase the samara then the samara is leathered. The annetta does not eat the beilul.", "logic": "\nLeathered(samara)\nnot Abbreviate(samara, annetta)\nRoughcast(annetta, beilul)\nPorter(annetta, beilul)\nRoughcast(beilul, samara)\nRoughcast(beilul, ethelda)\nDummy(beilul)\nFreehanded(beilul)\nAbbreviate(beilul, samara)\nFreehanded(ethelda)\nforall x (Dummy(x) and not Roughcast(x, samara) -> not Porter(x, beilul))\nforall x (Dummy(x) -> Southward(x))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, beilul) and Roughcast(beilul, ethelda) -> not Pukka(ethelda))\nforall x (Southward(x) -> not Pukka(x))\nforall x (Porter(x, beilul) and not Roughcast(x, samara) -> not Porter(x, samara))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) and Roughcast(x, annetta) -> Abbreviate(x, samara))\nAbbreviate(ethelda, annetta) -> Freehanded(ethelda)\nnot Roughcast(annetta, samara) -> Leathered(samara)\n\nnot Porter(annetta, beilul)\n\ntherefore Porter(annetta, beilul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The raleigh is diametral. The raleigh does not like the kaylil. The kaylil cosponsor the amaleta. The kaylil invigilate the amaleta. The amaleta cosponsor the raleigh. The amaleta cosponsor the tricia. The amaleta is stormy. The amaleta is stabilised. The amaleta leaven the raleigh. The tricia is stabilised. If something is stormy and it does not chase the raleigh then it does not eat the amaleta. Kind things are aging. If something leaven the amaleta and the amaleta cosponsor the tricia then the tricia is not sodden. If something is aging then it is not sodden. If something invigilate the amaleta and it does not chase the raleigh then it does not eat the raleigh. If something is stabilised and it cosponsor the kaylil then it leaven the raleigh. If the tricia leaven the kaylil then the tricia is stabilised. If the kaylil does not chase the raleigh then the raleigh is diametral. The amaleta is aging.", "logic": "\nDiametral(raleigh)\nnot Leaven(raleigh, kaylil)\nCosponsor(kaylil, amaleta)\nInvigilate(kaylil, amaleta)\nCosponsor(amaleta, raleigh)\nCosponsor(amaleta, tricia)\nStormy(amaleta)\nStabilised(amaleta)\nLeaven(amaleta, raleigh)\nStabilised(tricia)\nforall x (Stormy(x) and not Cosponsor(x, raleigh) -> not Invigilate(x, amaleta))\nforall x (Stormy(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Leaven(x, amaleta) and Cosponsor(amaleta, tricia) -> not Sodden(tricia))\nforall x (Aging(x) -> not Sodden(x))\nforall x (Invigilate(x, amaleta) and not Cosponsor(x, raleigh) -> not Invigilate(x, raleigh))\nforall x (Stabilised(x) and Cosponsor(x, kaylil) -> Leaven(x, raleigh))\nLeaven(tricia, kaylil) -> Stabilised(tricia)\nnot Cosponsor(kaylil, raleigh) -> Diametral(raleigh)\n\nAging(amaleta)\n\nStormy(amaleta) and forall x (Stormy(x) -> Aging(x)) -> therefore Aging(amaleta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The eba is favourite. The eba does not like the percy. The percy chasten the janel. The percy dabble the janel. The janel chasten the eba. The janel chasten the amalita. The janel is material. The janel is fine. The janel educate the eba. The amalita is fine. If something is material and it does not chase the eba then it does not eat the janel. Kind things are aphakic. If something educate the janel and the janel chasten the amalita then the amalita is not rending. If something is aphakic then it is not rending. If something dabble the janel and it does not chase the eba then it does not eat the eba. If something is fine and it chasten the percy then it educate the eba. If the amalita educate the percy then the amalita is fine. If the percy does not chase the eba then the eba is favourite. The janel is not aphakic.", "logic": "\nFavourite(eba)\nnot Educate(eba, percy)\nChasten(percy, janel)\nDabble(percy, janel)\nChasten(janel, eba)\nChasten(janel, amalita)\nMaterial(janel)\nFine(janel)\nEducate(janel, eba)\nFine(amalita)\nforall x (Material(x) and not Chasten(x, eba) -> not Dabble(x, janel))\nforall x (Material(x) -> Aphakic(x))\nforall x (Educate(x, janel) and Chasten(janel, amalita) -> not Rending(amalita))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) -> not Rending(x))\nforall x (Dabble(x, janel) and not Chasten(x, eba) -> not Dabble(x, eba))\nforall x (Fine(x) and Chasten(x, percy) -> Educate(x, eba))\nEducate(amalita, percy) -> Fine(amalita)\nnot Chasten(percy, eba) -> Favourite(eba)\n\nnot Aphakic(janel)\n\nMaterial(janel) and forall x (Material(x) -> Aphakic(x)) -> therefore Aphakic(janel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The bunni is snuffly. The bunni does not like the estell. The estell videotape the keren. The estell overstrain the keren. The keren videotape the bunni. The keren videotape the theodosia. The keren is panicled. The keren is timely. The keren depute the bunni. The theodosia is timely. If something is panicled and it does not chase the bunni then it does not eat the keren. Kind things are clathrate. If something depute the keren and the keren videotape the theodosia then the theodosia is not apivorous. If something is clathrate then it is not apivorous. If something overstrain the keren and it does not chase the bunni then it does not eat the bunni. If something is timely and it videotape the estell then it depute the bunni. If the theodosia depute the estell then the theodosia is timely. If the estell does not chase the bunni then the bunni is snuffly. The keren is not apivorous.", "logic": "\nSnuffly(bunni)\nnot Depute(bunni, estell)\nVideotape(estell, keren)\nOverstrain(estell, keren)\nVideotape(keren, bunni)\nVideotape(keren, theodosia)\nPanicled(keren)\nTimely(keren)\nDepute(keren, bunni)\nTimely(theodosia)\nforall x (Panicled(x) and not Videotape(x, bunni) -> not Overstrain(x, keren))\nforall x (Panicled(x) -> Clathrate(x))\nforall x (Depute(x, keren) and Videotape(keren, theodosia) -> not Apivorous(theodosia))\nforall x (Clathrate(x) -> not Apivorous(x))\nforall x (Overstrain(x, keren) and not Videotape(x, bunni) -> not Overstrain(x, bunni))\nforall x (Timely(x) and Videotape(x, estell) -> Depute(x, bunni))\nDepute(theodosia, estell) -> Timely(theodosia)\nnot Videotape(estell, bunni) -> Snuffly(bunni)\n\nnot Apivorous(keren)\n\nPanicled(keren) and forall x (Panicled(x) -> Clathrate(x)) -> therefore Clathrate(keren) Clathrate(keren) and forall x (Clathrate(x) -> not Apivorous(x)) -> therefore not Apivorous(keren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The leonardo is unquiet. The leonardo does not like the sande. The sande regrow the gabriell. The sande sideswipe the gabriell. The gabriell regrow the leonardo. The gabriell regrow the kirbie. The gabriell is ossicular. The gabriell is crabbed. The gabriell forego the leonardo. The kirbie is crabbed. If something is ossicular and it does not chase the leonardo then it does not eat the gabriell. Kind things are mongol. If something forego the gabriell and the gabriell regrow the kirbie then the kirbie is not belittled. If something is mongol then it is not belittled. If something sideswipe the gabriell and it does not chase the leonardo then it does not eat the leonardo. If something is crabbed and it regrow the sande then it forego the leonardo. If the kirbie forego the sande then the kirbie is crabbed. If the sande does not chase the leonardo then the leonardo is unquiet. The gabriell is belittled.", "logic": "\nUnquiet(leonardo)\nnot Forego(leonardo, sande)\nRegrow(sande, gabriell)\nSideswipe(sande, gabriell)\nRegrow(gabriell, leonardo)\nRegrow(gabriell, kirbie)\nOssicular(gabriell)\nCrabbed(gabriell)\nForego(gabriell, leonardo)\nCrabbed(kirbie)\nforall x (Ossicular(x) and not Regrow(x, leonardo) -> not Sideswipe(x, gabriell))\nforall x (Ossicular(x) -> Mongol(x))\nforall x (Forego(x, gabriell) and Regrow(gabriell, kirbie) -> not Belittled(kirbie))\nforall x (Mongol(x) -> not Belittled(x))\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, gabriell) and not Regrow(x, leonardo) -> not Sideswipe(x, leonardo))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) and Regrow(x, sande) -> Forego(x, leonardo))\nForego(kirbie, sande) -> Crabbed(kirbie)\nnot Regrow(sande, leonardo) -> Unquiet(leonardo)\n\nBelittled(gabriell)\n\nOssicular(gabriell) and forall x (Ossicular(x) -> Mongol(x)) -> therefore Mongol(gabriell) Mongol(gabriell) and forall x (Mongol(x) -> not Belittled(x)) -> therefore not Belittled(gabriell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The peter is marly. The peter does not like the blinny. The blinny subsidize the nettle. The blinny ruin the nettle. The nettle subsidize the peter. The nettle subsidize the devina. The nettle is narcotic. The nettle is imbalanced. The nettle mercerise the peter. The devina is imbalanced. If something is narcotic and it does not chase the peter then it does not eat the nettle. Kind things are nomadic. If something mercerise the nettle and the nettle subsidize the devina then the devina is not athenian. If something is nomadic then it is not athenian. If something ruin the nettle and it does not chase the peter then it does not eat the peter. If something is imbalanced and it subsidize the blinny then it mercerise the peter. If the devina mercerise the blinny then the devina is imbalanced. If the blinny does not chase the peter then the peter is marly. The devina does not like the peter.", "logic": "\nMarly(peter)\nnot Mercerise(peter, blinny)\nSubsidize(blinny, nettle)\nRuin(blinny, nettle)\nSubsidize(nettle, peter)\nSubsidize(nettle, devina)\nNarcotic(nettle)\nImbalanced(nettle)\nMercerise(nettle, peter)\nImbalanced(devina)\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and not Subsidize(x, peter) -> not Ruin(x, nettle))\nforall x (Narcotic(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, nettle) and Subsidize(nettle, devina) -> not Athenian(devina))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> not Athenian(x))\nforall x (Ruin(x, nettle) and not Subsidize(x, peter) -> not Ruin(x, peter))\nforall x (Imbalanced(x) and Subsidize(x, blinny) -> Mercerise(x, peter))\nMercerise(devina, blinny) -> Imbalanced(devina)\nnot Subsidize(blinny, peter) -> Marly(peter)\n\nnot Mercerise(devina, peter)\n\nforall x (Imbalanced(x) and Subsidize(x, blinny) -> Mercerise(x, peter)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The aigneis is knotted. The aigneis does not like the kora. The kora tyrannize the pammie. The kora scarf the pammie. The pammie tyrannize the aigneis. The pammie tyrannize the odie. The pammie is molar. The pammie is imperative. The pammie toady the aigneis. The odie is imperative. If something is molar and it does not chase the aigneis then it does not eat the pammie. Kind things are littered. If something toady the pammie and the pammie tyrannize the odie then the odie is not hackneyed. If something is littered then it is not hackneyed. If something scarf the pammie and it does not chase the aigneis then it does not eat the aigneis. If something is imperative and it tyrannize the kora then it toady the aigneis. If the odie toady the kora then the odie is imperative. If the kora does not chase the aigneis then the aigneis is knotted. The odie is littered.", "logic": "\nKnotted(aigneis)\nnot Toady(aigneis, kora)\nTyrannize(kora, pammie)\nScarf(kora, pammie)\nTyrannize(pammie, aigneis)\nTyrannize(pammie, odie)\nMolar(pammie)\nImperative(pammie)\nToady(pammie, aigneis)\nImperative(odie)\nforall x (Molar(x) and not Tyrannize(x, aigneis) -> not Scarf(x, pammie))\nforall x (Molar(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Toady(x, pammie) and Tyrannize(pammie, odie) -> not Hackneyed(odie))\nforall x (Littered(x) -> not Hackneyed(x))\nforall x (Scarf(x, pammie) and not Tyrannize(x, aigneis) -> not Scarf(x, aigneis))\nforall x (Imperative(x) and Tyrannize(x, kora) -> Toady(x, aigneis))\nToady(odie, kora) -> Imperative(odie)\nnot Tyrannize(kora, aigneis) -> Knotted(aigneis)\n\nLittered(odie)\n\nforall x (Molar(x) -> Littered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The lucilia is eukaryotic. The lucilia does not like the doti. The doti ameliorate the myrtle. The doti delimitate the myrtle. The myrtle ameliorate the lucilia. The myrtle ameliorate the filipe. The myrtle is impotent. The myrtle is leaved. The myrtle uncrate the lucilia. The filipe is leaved. If something is impotent and it does not chase the lucilia then it does not eat the myrtle. Kind things are maniacal. If something uncrate the myrtle and the myrtle ameliorate the filipe then the filipe is not ribald. If something is maniacal then it is not ribald. If something delimitate the myrtle and it does not chase the lucilia then it does not eat the lucilia. If something is leaved and it ameliorate the doti then it uncrate the lucilia. If the filipe uncrate the doti then the filipe is leaved. If the doti does not chase the lucilia then the lucilia is eukaryotic. The doti does not like the lucilia.", "logic": "\nEukaryotic(lucilia)\nnot Uncrate(lucilia, doti)\nAmeliorate(doti, myrtle)\nDelimitate(doti, myrtle)\nAmeliorate(myrtle, lucilia)\nAmeliorate(myrtle, filipe)\nImpotent(myrtle)\nLeaved(myrtle)\nUncrate(myrtle, lucilia)\nLeaved(filipe)\nforall x (Impotent(x) and not Ameliorate(x, lucilia) -> not Delimitate(x, myrtle))\nforall x (Impotent(x) -> Maniacal(x))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, myrtle) and Ameliorate(myrtle, filipe) -> not Ribald(filipe))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> not Ribald(x))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, myrtle) and not Ameliorate(x, lucilia) -> not Delimitate(x, lucilia))\nforall x (Leaved(x) and Ameliorate(x, doti) -> Uncrate(x, lucilia))\nUncrate(filipe, doti) -> Leaved(filipe)\nnot Ameliorate(doti, lucilia) -> Eukaryotic(lucilia)\n\nnot Uncrate(doti, lucilia)\n\nforall x (Leaved(x) and Ameliorate(x, doti) -> Uncrate(x, lucilia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The worden is sore. The worden does not like the devinne. The devinne machinate the amabelle. The devinne elaborate the amabelle. The amabelle machinate the worden. The amabelle machinate the lynnea. The amabelle is palpable. The amabelle is remorseful. The amabelle push the worden. The lynnea is remorseful. If something is palpable and it does not chase the worden then it does not eat the amabelle. Kind things are bloody. If something push the amabelle and the amabelle machinate the lynnea then the lynnea is not donnian. If something is bloody then it is not donnian. If something elaborate the amabelle and it does not chase the worden then it does not eat the worden. If something is remorseful and it machinate the devinne then it push the worden. If the lynnea push the devinne then the lynnea is remorseful. If the devinne does not chase the worden then the worden is sore. The lynnea is sore.", "logic": "\nSore(worden)\nnot Push(worden, devinne)\nMachinate(devinne, amabelle)\nElaborate(devinne, amabelle)\nMachinate(amabelle, worden)\nMachinate(amabelle, lynnea)\nPalpable(amabelle)\nRemorseful(amabelle)\nPush(amabelle, worden)\nRemorseful(lynnea)\nforall x (Palpable(x) and not Machinate(x, worden) -> not Elaborate(x, amabelle))\nforall x (Palpable(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Push(x, amabelle) and Machinate(amabelle, lynnea) -> not Donnian(lynnea))\nforall x (Bloody(x) -> not Donnian(x))\nforall x (Elaborate(x, amabelle) and not Machinate(x, worden) -> not Elaborate(x, worden))\nforall x (Remorseful(x) and Machinate(x, devinne) -> Push(x, worden))\nPush(lynnea, devinne) -> Remorseful(lynnea)\nnot Machinate(devinne, worden) -> Sore(worden)\n\nSore(lynnea)\n\nSore(lynnea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The nela is cuboidal. The nela does not like the barb. The barb devaluate the marcus. The barb totalize the marcus. The marcus devaluate the nela. The marcus devaluate the adriane. The marcus is auriferous. The marcus is midway. The marcus tithe the nela. The adriane is midway. If something is auriferous and it does not chase the nela then it does not eat the marcus. Kind things are unemployed. If something tithe the marcus and the marcus devaluate the adriane then the adriane is not navicular. If something is unemployed then it is not navicular. If something totalize the marcus and it does not chase the nela then it does not eat the nela. If something is midway and it devaluate the barb then it tithe the nela. If the adriane tithe the barb then the adriane is midway. If the barb does not chase the nela then the nela is cuboidal. The nela does not eat the nela.", "logic": "\nCuboidal(nela)\nnot Tithe(nela, barb)\nDevaluate(barb, marcus)\nTotalize(barb, marcus)\nDevaluate(marcus, nela)\nDevaluate(marcus, adriane)\nAuriferous(marcus)\nMidway(marcus)\nTithe(marcus, nela)\nMidway(adriane)\nforall x (Auriferous(x) and not Devaluate(x, nela) -> not Totalize(x, marcus))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Unemployed(x))\nforall x (Tithe(x, marcus) and Devaluate(marcus, adriane) -> not Navicular(adriane))\nforall x (Unemployed(x) -> not Navicular(x))\nforall x (Totalize(x, marcus) and not Devaluate(x, nela) -> not Totalize(x, nela))\nforall x (Midway(x) and Devaluate(x, barb) -> Tithe(x, nela))\nTithe(adriane, barb) -> Midway(adriane)\nnot Devaluate(barb, nela) -> Cuboidal(nela)\n\nnot Totalize(nela, nela)\n\nnot Totalize(nela, nela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The ozzie is deep. The ozzie does not like the juliet. The juliet transcribe the terri. The juliet overstress the terri. The terri transcribe the ozzie. The terri transcribe the agnola. The terri is heraldist. The terri is unabridged. The terri soundproof the ozzie. The agnola is unabridged. If something is heraldist and it does not chase the ozzie then it does not eat the terri. Kind things are edentulous. If something soundproof the terri and the terri transcribe the agnola then the agnola is not beautiful. If something is edentulous then it is not beautiful. If something overstress the terri and it does not chase the ozzie then it does not eat the ozzie. If something is unabridged and it transcribe the juliet then it soundproof the ozzie. If the agnola soundproof the juliet then the agnola is unabridged. If the juliet does not chase the ozzie then the ozzie is deep. The terri overstress the agnola.", "logic": "\nDeep(ozzie)\nnot Soundproof(ozzie, juliet)\nTranscribe(juliet, terri)\nOverstress(juliet, terri)\nTranscribe(terri, ozzie)\nTranscribe(terri, agnola)\nHeraldist(terri)\nUnabridged(terri)\nSoundproof(terri, ozzie)\nUnabridged(agnola)\nforall x (Heraldist(x) and not Transcribe(x, ozzie) -> not Overstress(x, terri))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) -> Edentulous(x))\nforall x (Soundproof(x, terri) and Transcribe(terri, agnola) -> not Beautiful(agnola))\nforall x (Edentulous(x) -> not Beautiful(x))\nforall x (Overstress(x, terri) and not Transcribe(x, ozzie) -> not Overstress(x, ozzie))\nforall x (Unabridged(x) and Transcribe(x, juliet) -> Soundproof(x, ozzie))\nSoundproof(agnola, juliet) -> Unabridged(agnola)\nnot Transcribe(juliet, ozzie) -> Deep(ozzie)\n\nOverstress(terri, agnola)\n\nOverstress(terri, agnola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-609"} {"premises": "The marga unreel the batsheva. The mellisa does not see the marga. The batsheva does not see the marga. If the marga is ionic and the mellisa does not chase the marga then the mellisa crump the marga. If something unreel the batsheva then the batsheva is faddy. If something is faddy then it unreel the batsheva. The mellisa does not see the marga.", "logic": "\nUnreel(marga, batsheva)\nnot Appose(mellisa, marga)\nnot Appose(batsheva, marga)\nIonic(marga) and not Unreel(mellisa, marga) -> Crump(mellisa, marga)\nforall x (Unreel(x, batsheva) -> Faddy(batsheva))\nforall x (Faddy(x) -> Unreel(x, batsheva))\n\nnot Appose(mellisa, marga)\n\ntherefore not Appose(mellisa, marga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The agretha malign the sharity. The sondra does not see the agretha. The sharity does not see the agretha. If the agretha is djiboutian and the sondra does not chase the agretha then the sondra pumice the agretha. If something malign the sharity then the sharity is licked. If something is licked then it malign the sharity. The agretha does not chase the sharity.", "logic": "\nMalign(agretha, sharity)\nnot Trowel(sondra, agretha)\nnot Trowel(sharity, agretha)\nDjiboutian(agretha) and not Malign(sondra, agretha) -> Pumice(sondra, agretha)\nforall x (Malign(x, sharity) -> Licked(sharity))\nforall x (Licked(x) -> Malign(x, sharity))\n\nnot Malign(agretha, sharity)\n\ntherefore Malign(agretha, sharity)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The millie mesmerize the sheree. The kellia does not see the millie. The sheree does not see the millie. If the millie is blockish and the kellia does not chase the millie then the kellia robe the millie. If something mesmerize the sheree then the sheree is unwebbed. If something is unwebbed then it mesmerize the sheree. The sheree is unwebbed.", "logic": "\nMesmerize(millie, sheree)\nnot Rumble(kellia, millie)\nnot Rumble(sheree, millie)\nBlockish(millie) and not Mesmerize(kellia, millie) -> Robe(kellia, millie)\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, sheree) -> Unwebbed(sheree))\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) -> Mesmerize(x, sheree))\n\nUnwebbed(sheree)\n\nMesmerize(millie, sheree) and forall x (Mesmerize(x, sheree) -> Unwebbed(sheree)) -> therefore Unwebbed(sheree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The faye ally the jules. The kittie does not see the faye. The jules does not see the faye. If the faye is spendable and the kittie does not chase the faye then the kittie wrest the faye. If something ally the jules then the jules is undulant. If something is undulant then it ally the jules. The jules is not undulant.", "logic": "\nAlly(faye, jules)\nnot Cast(kittie, faye)\nnot Cast(jules, faye)\nSpendable(faye) and not Ally(kittie, faye) -> Wrest(kittie, faye)\nforall x (Ally(x, jules) -> Undulant(jules))\nforall x (Undulant(x) -> Ally(x, jules))\n\nnot Undulant(jules)\n\nAlly(faye, jules) and forall x (Ally(x, jules) -> Undulant(jules)) -> therefore Undulant(jules)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The gayle reference the joleen. The cynthy does not see the gayle. The joleen does not see the gayle. If the gayle is inorganic and the cynthy does not chase the gayle then the cynthy entice the gayle. If something reference the joleen then the joleen is marsupial. If something is marsupial then it reference the joleen. The joleen reference the joleen.", "logic": "\nReference(gayle, joleen)\nnot Shill(cynthy, gayle)\nnot Shill(joleen, gayle)\nInorganic(gayle) and not Reference(cynthy, gayle) -> Entice(cynthy, gayle)\nforall x (Reference(x, joleen) -> Marsupial(joleen))\nforall x (Marsupial(x) -> Reference(x, joleen))\n\nReference(joleen, joleen)\n\nReference(gayle, joleen) and forall x (Reference(x, joleen) -> Marsupial(joleen)) -> therefore Marsupial(joleen) Marsupial(joleen) and forall x (Marsupial(x) -> Reference(x, joleen)) -> therefore Reference(joleen, joleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The shurwood outstay the othelia. The andonis does not see the shurwood. The othelia does not see the shurwood. If the shurwood is jaunty and the andonis does not chase the shurwood then the andonis withdraw the shurwood. If something outstay the othelia then the othelia is aegean. If something is aegean then it outstay the othelia. The othelia does not chase the othelia.", "logic": "\nOutstay(shurwood, othelia)\nnot Exasperate(andonis, shurwood)\nnot Exasperate(othelia, shurwood)\nJaunty(shurwood) and not Outstay(andonis, shurwood) -> Withdraw(andonis, shurwood)\nforall x (Outstay(x, othelia) -> Aegean(othelia))\nforall x (Aegean(x) -> Outstay(x, othelia))\n\nnot Outstay(othelia, othelia)\n\nOutstay(shurwood, othelia) and forall x (Outstay(x, othelia) -> Aegean(othelia)) -> therefore Aegean(othelia) Aegean(othelia) and forall x (Aegean(x) -> Outstay(x, othelia)) -> therefore Outstay(othelia, othelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The alfredo overturn the rebekah. The merle does not see the alfredo. The rebekah does not see the alfredo. If the alfredo is crumpled and the merle does not chase the alfredo then the merle emphasize the alfredo. If something overturn the rebekah then the rebekah is mandean. If something is mandean then it overturn the rebekah. The merle does not visit the alfredo.", "logic": "\nOverturn(alfredo, rebekah)\nnot Board(merle, alfredo)\nnot Board(rebekah, alfredo)\nCrumpled(alfredo) and not Overturn(merle, alfredo) -> Emphasize(merle, alfredo)\nforall x (Overturn(x, rebekah) -> Mandean(rebekah))\nforall x (Mandean(x) -> Overturn(x, rebekah))\n\nnot Emphasize(merle, alfredo)\n\nCrumpled(alfredo) and not Overturn(merle, alfredo) -> Emphasize(merle, alfredo) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The taber necrose the marys. The emmalyn does not see the taber. The marys does not see the taber. If the taber is broadnosed and the emmalyn does not chase the taber then the emmalyn trifurcate the taber. If something necrose the marys then the marys is antemortem. If something is antemortem then it necrose the marys. The emmalyn necrose the marys.", "logic": "\nNecrose(taber, marys)\nnot Canvas(emmalyn, taber)\nnot Canvas(marys, taber)\nBroadnosed(taber) and not Necrose(emmalyn, taber) -> Trifurcate(emmalyn, taber)\nforall x (Necrose(x, marys) -> Antemortem(marys))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> Necrose(x, marys))\n\nNecrose(emmalyn, marys)\n\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> Necrose(x, marys)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The eydie lilt the dona. The torey does not see the eydie. The dona does not see the eydie. If the eydie is forbearing and the torey does not chase the eydie then the torey restore the eydie. If something lilt the dona then the dona is unusual. If something is unusual then it lilt the dona. The dona is not blue.", "logic": "\nLilt(eydie, dona)\nnot Skip(torey, eydie)\nnot Skip(dona, eydie)\nForbearing(eydie) and not Lilt(torey, eydie) -> Restore(torey, eydie)\nforall x (Lilt(x, dona) -> Unusual(dona))\nforall x (Unusual(x) -> Lilt(x, dona))\n\nnot Blue(dona)\n\nnot Blue(dona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The robin suffice the damian. The bunny does not see the robin. The damian does not see the robin. If the robin is expressive and the bunny does not chase the robin then the bunny compound the robin. If something suffice the damian then the damian is anaglyptic. If something is anaglyptic then it suffice the damian. The damian compound the damian.", "logic": "\nSuffice(robin, damian)\nnot Ding(bunny, robin)\nnot Ding(damian, robin)\nExpressive(robin) and not Suffice(bunny, robin) -> Compound(bunny, robin)\nforall x (Suffice(x, damian) -> Anaglyptic(damian))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Suffice(x, damian))\n\nCompound(damian, damian)\n\nCompound(damian, damian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The carlin prosecute the rebbecca. The janie does not see the carlin. The rebbecca does not see the carlin. If the carlin is drained and the janie does not chase the carlin then the janie divagate the carlin. If something prosecute the rebbecca then the rebbecca is rabid. If something is rabid then it prosecute the rebbecca. The carlin does not see the rebbecca.", "logic": "\nProsecute(carlin, rebbecca)\nnot Forfeit(janie, carlin)\nnot Forfeit(rebbecca, carlin)\nDrained(carlin) and not Prosecute(janie, carlin) -> Divagate(janie, carlin)\nforall x (Prosecute(x, rebbecca) -> Rabid(rebbecca))\nforall x (Rabid(x) -> Prosecute(x, rebbecca))\n\nnot Forfeit(carlin, rebbecca)\n\nnot Forfeit(carlin, rebbecca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "The kirsten jolt the pedro. The marven does not see the kirsten. The pedro does not see the kirsten. If the kirsten is bound and the marven does not chase the kirsten then the marven unbend the kirsten. If something jolt the pedro then the pedro is overhand. If something is overhand then it jolt the pedro. The marven unbend the marven.", "logic": "\nJolt(kirsten, pedro)\nnot Feud(marven, kirsten)\nnot Feud(pedro, kirsten)\nBound(kirsten) and not Jolt(marven, kirsten) -> Unbend(marven, kirsten)\nforall x (Jolt(x, pedro) -> Overhand(pedro))\nforall x (Overhand(x) -> Jolt(x, pedro))\n\nUnbend(marven, marven)\n\nUnbend(marven, marven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1012"} {"premises": "Bessie is aerolitic. Glynda is burnt. Gisella is aerobiotic. Penny is sunstruck. If something is aerobiotic and burnt then it is unlined. All burnt things are aerobiotic. Gisella is aerobiotic.", "logic": "\nAerolitic(bessie)\nBurnt(glynda)\nAerobiotic(gisella)\nSunstruck(penny)\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) and Burnt(x) -> Unlined(x))\nforall x (Burnt(x) -> Aerobiotic(x))\n\nAerobiotic(gisella)\n\ntherefore Aerobiotic(gisella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Humbert is neurologic. Hebert is visceral. Karel is quaternary. Jamey is phalangeal. If something is quaternary and visceral then it is delusory. All visceral things are quaternary. Karel is not quaternary.", "logic": "\nNeurologic(humbert)\nVisceral(hebert)\nQuaternary(karel)\nPhalangeal(jamey)\nforall x (Quaternary(x) and Visceral(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Visceral(x) -> Quaternary(x))\n\nnot Quaternary(karel)\n\ntherefore Quaternary(karel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Giraldo is nonhuman. Renard is kechuan. Angel is newfangled. Ginevra is anuric. If something is newfangled and kechuan then it is ugly. All kechuan things are newfangled. Renard is newfangled.", "logic": "\nNonhuman(giraldo)\nKechuan(renard)\nNewfangled(angel)\nAnuric(ginevra)\nforall x (Newfangled(x) and Kechuan(x) -> Ugly(x))\nforall x (Kechuan(x) -> Newfangled(x))\n\nNewfangled(renard)\n\nKechuan(renard) and forall x (Kechuan(x) -> Newfangled(x)) -> therefore Newfangled(renard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Maressa is lipped. Stirling is peanut. Romonda is uremic. Sharleen is afloat. If something is uremic and peanut then it is seeming. All peanut things are uremic. Stirling is not uremic.", "logic": "\nLipped(maressa)\nPeanut(stirling)\nUremic(romonda)\nAfloat(sharleen)\nforall x (Uremic(x) and Peanut(x) -> Seeming(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Uremic(x))\n\nnot Uremic(stirling)\n\nPeanut(stirling) and forall x (Peanut(x) -> Uremic(x)) -> therefore Uremic(stirling)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Leandra is ugandan. Hilbert is vacuolated. Marylou is monetary. Margot is thwarted. If something is monetary and vacuolated then it is said. All vacuolated things are monetary. Hilbert is said.", "logic": "\nUgandan(leandra)\nVacuolated(hilbert)\nMonetary(marylou)\nThwarted(margot)\nforall x (Monetary(x) and Vacuolated(x) -> Said(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Monetary(x))\n\nSaid(hilbert)\n\nVacuolated(hilbert) and forall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Monetary(x)) -> therefore Monetary(hilbert) Monetary(hilbert) and Vacuolated(hilbert) and forall x (Monetary(x) and Vacuolated(x) -> Said(x)) -> therefore Said(hilbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Ibrahim is ciliated. Jacquelin is unexcelled. Mavra is stately. Boniface is eradicable. If something is stately and unexcelled then it is nameless. All unexcelled things are stately. Jacquelin is not nameless.", "logic": "\nCiliated(ibrahim)\nUnexcelled(jacquelin)\nStately(mavra)\nEradicable(boniface)\nforall x (Stately(x) and Unexcelled(x) -> Nameless(x))\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Stately(x))\n\nnot Nameless(jacquelin)\n\nUnexcelled(jacquelin) and forall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Stately(x)) -> therefore Stately(jacquelin) Stately(jacquelin) and Unexcelled(jacquelin) and forall x (Stately(x) and Unexcelled(x) -> Nameless(x)) -> therefore Nameless(jacquelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Essie is fusiform. Georgy is calicular. Piggy is monetary. Julianna is unoccupied. If something is monetary and calicular then it is tailless. All calicular things are monetary. Piggy is not tailless.", "logic": "\nFusiform(essie)\nCalicular(georgy)\nMonetary(piggy)\nUnoccupied(julianna)\nforall x (Monetary(x) and Calicular(x) -> Tailless(x))\nforall x (Calicular(x) -> Monetary(x))\n\nnot Tailless(piggy)\n\nforall x (Monetary(x) and Calicular(x) -> Tailless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Tomkin is apomictic. Vinod is millenary. Geo is euphonious. Tibold is commanding. If something is euphonious and millenary then it is male. All millenary things are euphonious. Tomkin is euphonious.", "logic": "\nApomictic(tomkin)\nMillenary(vinod)\nEuphonious(geo)\nCommanding(tibold)\nforall x (Euphonious(x) and Millenary(x) -> Male(x))\nforall x (Millenary(x) -> Euphonious(x))\n\nEuphonious(tomkin)\n\nforall x (Millenary(x) -> Euphonious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Lynnett is fascinated. Bronson is footed. Andree is compound. Cordelia is surficial. If something is compound and footed then it is subdural. All footed things are compound. Lynnett is not subdural.", "logic": "\nFascinated(lynnett)\nFooted(bronson)\nCompound(andree)\nSurficial(cordelia)\nforall x (Compound(x) and Footed(x) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Footed(x) -> Compound(x))\n\nnot Subdural(lynnett)\n\nforall x (Compound(x) and Footed(x) -> Subdural(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Maxie is moot. Freeman is embossed. Justis is timorese. Delilah is pardonable. If something is timorese and embossed then it is reasoning. All embossed things are timorese. Delilah is big.", "logic": "\nMoot(maxie)\nEmbossed(freeman)\nTimorese(justis)\nPardonable(delilah)\nforall x (Timorese(x) and Embossed(x) -> Reasoning(x))\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Timorese(x))\n\nBig(delilah)\n\nBig(delilah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Lucille is unplanted. Manon is modulated. Rozanna is unvendible. Hamnet is phobic. If something is unvendible and modulated then it is dowerless. All modulated things are unvendible. Hamnet is not unplanted.", "logic": "\nUnplanted(lucille)\nModulated(manon)\nUnvendible(rozanna)\nPhobic(hamnet)\nforall x (Unvendible(x) and Modulated(x) -> Dowerless(x))\nforall x (Modulated(x) -> Unvendible(x))\n\nnot Unplanted(hamnet)\n\nnot Unplanted(hamnet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Sky is goofy. Wini is soundproof. Teodora is ugly. Britt is oxidizable. If something is ugly and soundproof then it is vendable. All soundproof things are ugly. Wini is goofy.", "logic": "\nGoofy(sky)\nSoundproof(wini)\nUgly(teodora)\nOxidizable(britt)\nforall x (Ugly(x) and Soundproof(x) -> Vendable(x))\nforall x (Soundproof(x) -> Ugly(x))\n\nGoofy(wini)\n\nGoofy(wini) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Kathye is unrifled. Brigitta is outright. Rochelle is clubby. Mauritz is outright. All unhopeful, poached things are unrifled. If something is outright then it is clubby. All unrifled things are specific. All clubby things are unrifled. If something is unrifled then it is outright. All specific, poached things are depressant. Brigitta is outright.", "logic": "\nUnrifled(kathye)\nOutright(brigitta)\nClubby(rochelle)\nOutright(mauritz)\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) and Poached(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Outright(x) -> Clubby(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> Specific(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> Outright(x))\nforall x (Specific(x) and Poached(x) -> Depressant(x))\n\nOutright(brigitta)\n\ntherefore Outright(brigitta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Elton is bahraini. Shandra is bicapsular. Juliana is dextrorsal. Ambros is bicapsular. All humdrum, affine things are bahraini. If something is bicapsular then it is dextrorsal. All bahraini things are affirmable. All dextrorsal things are bahraini. If something is bahraini then it is bicapsular. All affirmable, affine things are bandy. Juliana is not dextrorsal.", "logic": "\nBahraini(elton)\nBicapsular(shandra)\nDextrorsal(juliana)\nBicapsular(ambros)\nforall x (Humdrum(x) and Affine(x) -> Bahraini(x))\nforall x (Bicapsular(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\nforall x (Bahraini(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) -> Bahraini(x))\nforall x (Bahraini(x) -> Bicapsular(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) and Affine(x) -> Bandy(x))\n\nnot Dextrorsal(juliana)\n\ntherefore Dextrorsal(juliana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Jayme is immaterial. Rhoda is shameless. Florinda is ugandan. Nalani is shameless. All alarming, cool things are immaterial. If something is shameless then it is ugandan. All immaterial things are misty. All ugandan things are immaterial. If something is immaterial then it is shameless. All misty, cool things are great. Rhoda is ugandan.", "logic": "\nImmaterial(jayme)\nShameless(rhoda)\nUgandan(florinda)\nShameless(nalani)\nforall x (Alarming(x) and Cool(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Shameless(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Misty(x))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) and Cool(x) -> Great(x))\n\nUgandan(rhoda)\n\nShameless(rhoda) and forall x (Shameless(x) -> Ugandan(x)) -> therefore Ugandan(rhoda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Shayla is appealing. Dyanne is vitalizing. Stevy is eclectic. Dorian is vitalizing. All unsexed, ritenuto things are appealing. If something is vitalizing then it is eclectic. All appealing things are fattish. All eclectic things are appealing. If something is appealing then it is vitalizing. All fattish, ritenuto things are fluvial. Stevy is not appealing.", "logic": "\nAppealing(shayla)\nVitalizing(dyanne)\nEclectic(stevy)\nVitalizing(dorian)\nforall x (Unsexed(x) and Ritenuto(x) -> Appealing(x))\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) -> Eclectic(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) -> Fattish(x))\nforall x (Eclectic(x) -> Appealing(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Fattish(x) and Ritenuto(x) -> Fluvial(x))\n\nnot Appealing(stevy)\n\nEclectic(stevy) and forall x (Eclectic(x) -> Appealing(x)) -> therefore Appealing(stevy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Welbie is nonverbal. Ellette is fighting. Jolyn is gouty. Orelee is fighting. All uncolored, exalting things are nonverbal. If something is fighting then it is gouty. All nonverbal things are diatomic. All gouty things are nonverbal. If something is nonverbal then it is fighting. All diatomic, exalting things are leathered. Orelee is nonverbal.", "logic": "\nNonverbal(welbie)\nFighting(ellette)\nGouty(jolyn)\nFighting(orelee)\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and Exalting(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) -> Gouty(x))\nforall x (Nonverbal(x) -> Diatomic(x))\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Nonverbal(x) -> Fighting(x))\nforall x (Diatomic(x) and Exalting(x) -> Leathered(x))\n\nNonverbal(orelee)\n\nFighting(orelee) and forall x (Fighting(x) -> Gouty(x)) -> therefore Gouty(orelee) Gouty(orelee) and forall x (Gouty(x) -> Nonverbal(x)) -> therefore Nonverbal(orelee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Blondy is branchial. Merwin is bloody. Stu is blunted. Rosemarie is bloody. All rupicolous, ghanese things are branchial. If something is bloody then it is blunted. All branchial things are impetuous. All blunted things are branchial. If something is branchial then it is bloody. All impetuous, ghanese things are plump. Rosemarie is not branchial.", "logic": "\nBranchial(blondy)\nBloody(merwin)\nBlunted(stu)\nBloody(rosemarie)\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) and Ghanese(x) -> Branchial(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x) -> Blunted(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Blunted(x) -> Branchial(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and Ghanese(x) -> Plump(x))\n\nnot Branchial(rosemarie)\n\nBloody(rosemarie) and forall x (Bloody(x) -> Blunted(x)) -> therefore Blunted(rosemarie) Blunted(rosemarie) and forall x (Blunted(x) -> Branchial(x)) -> therefore Branchial(rosemarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Letta is archival. Neel is debonaire. Moreen is staminate. Lin is debonaire. All legitimate, changeless things are archival. If something is debonaire then it is staminate. All archival things are squinched. All staminate things are archival. If something is archival then it is debonaire. All squinched, changeless things are upbeat. Lin is not upbeat.", "logic": "\nArchival(letta)\nDebonaire(neel)\nStaminate(moreen)\nDebonaire(lin)\nforall x (Legitimate(x) and Changeless(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Debonaire(x) -> Staminate(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) -> Squinched(x))\nforall x (Staminate(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) -> Debonaire(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) and Changeless(x) -> Upbeat(x))\n\nnot Upbeat(lin)\n\nforall x (Squinched(x) and Changeless(x) -> Upbeat(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Gill is activated. Britaney is convex. Gusty is backward. Orel is convex. All cathectic, epizootic things are activated. If something is convex then it is backward. All activated things are dominican. All backward things are activated. If something is activated then it is convex. All dominican, epizootic things are boylike. Gill is boylike.", "logic": "\nActivated(gill)\nConvex(britaney)\nBackward(gusty)\nConvex(orel)\nforall x (Cathectic(x) and Epizootic(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Convex(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Dominican(x))\nforall x (Backward(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Convex(x))\nforall x (Dominican(x) and Epizootic(x) -> Boylike(x))\n\nBoylike(gill)\n\nforall x (Dominican(x) and Epizootic(x) -> Boylike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Cecil is unnerved. Sigrid is snooty. Lyda is operose. Donald is snooty. All spheroidal, infected things are unnerved. If something is snooty then it is operose. All unnerved things are husbandly. All operose things are unnerved. If something is unnerved then it is snooty. All husbandly, infected things are syncretic. Lyda is not syncretic.", "logic": "\nUnnerved(cecil)\nSnooty(sigrid)\nOperose(lyda)\nSnooty(donald)\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) and Infected(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Snooty(x) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Unnerved(x) -> Husbandly(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Unnerved(x) -> Snooty(x))\nforall x (Husbandly(x) and Infected(x) -> Syncretic(x))\n\nnot Syncretic(lyda)\n\nforall x (Husbandly(x) and Infected(x) -> Syncretic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Fancy is wrinkled. Hermina is isotonic. Dorree is witty. Willetta is isotonic. All miotic, infernal things are wrinkled. If something is isotonic then it is witty. All wrinkled things are stitched. All witty things are wrinkled. If something is wrinkled then it is isotonic. All stitched, infernal things are excused. Fancy is miotic.", "logic": "\nWrinkled(fancy)\nIsotonic(hermina)\nWitty(dorree)\nIsotonic(willetta)\nforall x (Miotic(x) and Infernal(x) -> Wrinkled(x))\nforall x (Isotonic(x) -> Witty(x))\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Witty(x) -> Wrinkled(x))\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) -> Isotonic(x))\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Infernal(x) -> Excused(x))\n\nMiotic(fancy)\n\nMiotic(fancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Krissie is woebegone. Jan is labored. Hazel is nontaxable. Duke is labored. All caitiff, empyreal things are woebegone. If something is labored then it is nontaxable. All woebegone things are ritual. All nontaxable things are woebegone. If something is woebegone then it is labored. All ritual, empyreal things are whitish. Duke is not caitiff.", "logic": "\nWoebegone(krissie)\nLabored(jan)\nNontaxable(hazel)\nLabored(duke)\nforall x (Caitiff(x) and Empyreal(x) -> Woebegone(x))\nforall x (Labored(x) -> Nontaxable(x))\nforall x (Woebegone(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) -> Woebegone(x))\nforall x (Woebegone(x) -> Labored(x))\nforall x (Ritual(x) and Empyreal(x) -> Whitish(x))\n\nnot Caitiff(duke)\n\nnot Caitiff(duke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Emlyn is gingery. Siana is posted. Val is unmovable. Wolfram is posted. All xiii, cancroid things are gingery. If something is posted then it is unmovable. All gingery things are tangential. All unmovable things are gingery. If something is gingery then it is posted. All tangential, cancroid things are deathlike. Val is xiii.", "logic": "\nGingery(emlyn)\nPosted(siana)\nUnmovable(val)\nPosted(wolfram)\nforall x (Xiii(x) and Cancroid(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Posted(x) -> Unmovable(x))\nforall x (Gingery(x) -> Tangential(x))\nforall x (Unmovable(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Gingery(x) -> Posted(x))\nforall x (Tangential(x) and Cancroid(x) -> Deathlike(x))\n\nXiii(val)\n\nXiii(val) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-520"} {"premises": "Eustace is transient. If Eustace is transient then Eustace is shakable. Quiet things are not euphonic. Quiet things are arboresque. All euphonic things are likeable. If Eustace is not euphonic then Eustace is aromatic. If Eustace is likeable and Eustace is euphonic then Eustace is aromatic. Eustace is transient.", "logic": "\nTransient(eustace)\nTransient(eustace) -> Shakable(eustace)\nforall x (Shakable(x) -> not Euphonic(x))\nforall x (Shakable(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Euphonic(x) -> Likeable(x))\nnot Euphonic(eustace) -> Aromatic(eustace)\nLikeable(eustace) and Euphonic(eustace) -> Aromatic(eustace)\n\nTransient(eustace)\n\ntherefore Transient(eustace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Harlin is divisive. If Harlin is divisive then Harlin is desiccate. Quiet things are not labile. Quiet things are lupine. All labile things are zippy. If Harlin is not labile then Harlin is ridged. If Harlin is zippy and Harlin is labile then Harlin is ridged. Harlin is not divisive.", "logic": "\nDivisive(harlin)\nDivisive(harlin) -> Desiccate(harlin)\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> not Labile(x))\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Zippy(x))\nnot Labile(harlin) -> Ridged(harlin)\nZippy(harlin) and Labile(harlin) -> Ridged(harlin)\n\nnot Divisive(harlin)\n\ntherefore Divisive(harlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Vera is capsulated. If Vera is capsulated then Vera is befuddled. Quiet things are not metrical. Quiet things are diatonic. All metrical things are chicken. If Vera is not metrical then Vera is edentulate. If Vera is chicken and Vera is metrical then Vera is edentulate. Vera is befuddled.", "logic": "\nCapsulated(vera)\nCapsulated(vera) -> Befuddled(vera)\nforall x (Befuddled(x) -> not Metrical(x))\nforall x (Befuddled(x) -> Diatonic(x))\nforall x (Metrical(x) -> Chicken(x))\nnot Metrical(vera) -> Edentulate(vera)\nChicken(vera) and Metrical(vera) -> Edentulate(vera)\n\nBefuddled(vera)\n\nCapsulated(vera) and Capsulated(vera) -> Befuddled(vera) -> therefore Befuddled(vera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Karil is rhyming. If Karil is rhyming then Karil is propellant. Quiet things are not kinetic. Quiet things are oral. All kinetic things are eccentric. If Karil is not kinetic then Karil is abridged. If Karil is eccentric and Karil is kinetic then Karil is abridged. Karil is not propellant.", "logic": "\nRhyming(karil)\nRhyming(karil) -> Propellant(karil)\nforall x (Propellant(x) -> not Kinetic(x))\nforall x (Propellant(x) -> Oral(x))\nforall x (Kinetic(x) -> Eccentric(x))\nnot Kinetic(karil) -> Abridged(karil)\nEccentric(karil) and Kinetic(karil) -> Abridged(karil)\n\nnot Propellant(karil)\n\nRhyming(karil) and Rhyming(karil) -> Propellant(karil) -> therefore Propellant(karil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Dahlia is heroic. If Dahlia is heroic then Dahlia is palpebrate. Quiet things are not backstair. Quiet things are unrelaxed. All backstair things are rimed. If Dahlia is not backstair then Dahlia is covert. If Dahlia is rimed and Dahlia is backstair then Dahlia is covert. Dahlia is not backstair.", "logic": "\nHeroic(dahlia)\nHeroic(dahlia) -> Palpebrate(dahlia)\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> not Backstair(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Backstair(x) -> Rimed(x))\nnot Backstair(dahlia) -> Covert(dahlia)\nRimed(dahlia) and Backstair(dahlia) -> Covert(dahlia)\n\nnot Backstair(dahlia)\n\nHeroic(dahlia) and Heroic(dahlia) -> Palpebrate(dahlia) -> therefore Palpebrate(dahlia) Palpebrate(dahlia) and forall x (Palpebrate(x) -> not Backstair(x)) -> therefore not Backstair(dahlia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Bary is pentatonic. If Bary is pentatonic then Bary is bivalve. Quiet things are not rejoicing. Quiet things are transpolar. All rejoicing things are intangible. If Bary is not rejoicing then Bary is nurturant. If Bary is intangible and Bary is rejoicing then Bary is nurturant. Bary is rejoicing.", "logic": "\nPentatonic(bary)\nPentatonic(bary) -> Bivalve(bary)\nforall x (Bivalve(x) -> not Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Rejoicing(x) -> Intangible(x))\nnot Rejoicing(bary) -> Nurturant(bary)\nIntangible(bary) and Rejoicing(bary) -> Nurturant(bary)\n\nRejoicing(bary)\n\nPentatonic(bary) and Pentatonic(bary) -> Bivalve(bary) -> therefore Bivalve(bary) Bivalve(bary) and forall x (Bivalve(x) -> not Rejoicing(x)) -> therefore not Rejoicing(bary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Joellyn is keyless. If Joellyn is keyless then Joellyn is thirteenth. Quiet things are not firsthand. Quiet things are steadfast. All firsthand things are bifacial. If Joellyn is not firsthand then Joellyn is squeezable. If Joellyn is bifacial and Joellyn is firsthand then Joellyn is squeezable. Joellyn is not bifacial.", "logic": "\nKeyless(joellyn)\nKeyless(joellyn) -> Thirteenth(joellyn)\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) -> not Firsthand(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) -> Steadfast(x))\nforall x (Firsthand(x) -> Bifacial(x))\nnot Firsthand(joellyn) -> Squeezable(joellyn)\nBifacial(joellyn) and Firsthand(joellyn) -> Squeezable(joellyn)\n\nnot Bifacial(joellyn)\n\nforall x (Firsthand(x) -> Bifacial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Alayne is omissible. If Alayne is omissible then Alayne is nocent. Quiet things are not fated. Quiet things are millennial. All fated things are previous. If Alayne is not fated then Alayne is rewardful. If Alayne is previous and Alayne is fated then Alayne is rewardful. Alayne is white.", "logic": "\nOmissible(alayne)\nOmissible(alayne) -> Nocent(alayne)\nforall x (Nocent(x) -> not Fated(x))\nforall x (Nocent(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Fated(x) -> Previous(x))\nnot Fated(alayne) -> Rewardful(alayne)\nPrevious(alayne) and Fated(alayne) -> Rewardful(alayne)\n\nWhite(alayne)\n\nWhite(alayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-607"} {"premises": "Stevana is vegetal. Stevana is removable. Stevana is swinging. Stevana is beatified. Wylma is vegetal. Roxanna is olfactory. Roxanna is swinging. If Roxanna is swinging then Roxanna is seljuk. All olfactory, seljuk people are pedantic. Wylma is vegetal.", "logic": "\nVegetal(stevana)\nRemovable(stevana)\nSwinging(stevana)\nBeatified(stevana)\nVegetal(wylma)\nOlfactory(roxanna)\nSwinging(roxanna)\nSwinging(roxanna) -> Seljuk(roxanna)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and Seljuk(x) -> Pedantic(x))\n\nVegetal(wylma)\n\ntherefore Vegetal(wylma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Karie is bouffant. Karie is reachable. Karie is slouchy. Karie is annelidan. Sharona is bouffant. Dodie is executable. Dodie is slouchy. If Dodie is slouchy then Dodie is terrene. All executable, terrene people are whiplike. Karie is not reachable.", "logic": "\nBouffant(karie)\nReachable(karie)\nSlouchy(karie)\nAnnelidan(karie)\nBouffant(sharona)\nExecutable(dodie)\nSlouchy(dodie)\nSlouchy(dodie) -> Terrene(dodie)\nforall x (Executable(x) and Terrene(x) -> Whiplike(x))\n\nnot Reachable(karie)\n\ntherefore Reachable(karie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Georgeta is diarrheic. Georgeta is unvalued. Georgeta is ninefold. Georgeta is intermural. Chloris is diarrheic. Kyle is rascally. Kyle is ninefold. If Kyle is ninefold then Kyle is columbian. All rascally, columbian people are offside. Kyle is columbian.", "logic": "\nDiarrheic(georgeta)\nUnvalued(georgeta)\nNinefold(georgeta)\nIntermural(georgeta)\nDiarrheic(chloris)\nRascally(kyle)\nNinefold(kyle)\nNinefold(kyle) -> Columbian(kyle)\nforall x (Rascally(x) and Columbian(x) -> Offside(x))\n\nColumbian(kyle)\n\nNinefold(kyle) and Ninefold(kyle) -> Columbian(kyle) -> therefore Columbian(kyle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Goldia is spiffy. Goldia is hydrous. Goldia is abomasal. Goldia is silken. Aura is spiffy. Jolie is influent. Jolie is abomasal. If Jolie is abomasal then Jolie is nonplussed. All influent, nonplussed people are stealthy. Jolie is not nonplussed.", "logic": "\nSpiffy(goldia)\nHydrous(goldia)\nAbomasal(goldia)\nSilken(goldia)\nSpiffy(aura)\nInfluent(jolie)\nAbomasal(jolie)\nAbomasal(jolie) -> Nonplussed(jolie)\nforall x (Influent(x) and Nonplussed(x) -> Stealthy(x))\n\nnot Nonplussed(jolie)\n\nAbomasal(jolie) and Abomasal(jolie) -> Nonplussed(jolie) -> therefore Nonplussed(jolie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Electra is dextrorsal. Electra is frilled. Electra is literal. Electra is perceived. Alexei is dextrorsal. Tabitha is misleading. Tabitha is literal. If Tabitha is literal then Tabitha is plebeian. All misleading, plebeian people are charnel. Tabitha is charnel.", "logic": "\nDextrorsal(electra)\nFrilled(electra)\nLiteral(electra)\nPerceived(electra)\nDextrorsal(alexei)\nMisleading(tabitha)\nLiteral(tabitha)\nLiteral(tabitha) -> Plebeian(tabitha)\nforall x (Misleading(x) and Plebeian(x) -> Charnel(x))\n\nCharnel(tabitha)\n\nLiteral(tabitha) and Literal(tabitha) -> Plebeian(tabitha) -> therefore Plebeian(tabitha) Misleading(tabitha) and Plebeian(tabitha) and forall x (Misleading(x) and Plebeian(x) -> Charnel(x)) -> therefore Charnel(tabitha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Meredeth is madcap. Meredeth is telescoped. Meredeth is augustan. Meredeth is offside. Emma is madcap. Ellynn is pitched. Ellynn is augustan. If Ellynn is augustan then Ellynn is isotopic. All pitched, isotopic people are pendent. Ellynn is not pendent.", "logic": "\nMadcap(meredeth)\nTelescoped(meredeth)\nAugustan(meredeth)\nOffside(meredeth)\nMadcap(emma)\nPitched(ellynn)\nAugustan(ellynn)\nAugustan(ellynn) -> Isotopic(ellynn)\nforall x (Pitched(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Pendent(x))\n\nnot Pendent(ellynn)\n\nAugustan(ellynn) and Augustan(ellynn) -> Isotopic(ellynn) -> therefore Isotopic(ellynn) Pitched(ellynn) and Isotopic(ellynn) and forall x (Pitched(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Pendent(x)) -> therefore Pendent(ellynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Cob is hybrid. Cob is tiny. Cob is apopemptic. Cob is nidicolous. Roseanne is hybrid. Juliette is imbecilic. Juliette is apopemptic. If Juliette is apopemptic then Juliette is anamorphic. All imbecilic, anamorphic people are everyday. Cob is not everyday.", "logic": "\nHybrid(cob)\nTiny(cob)\nApopemptic(cob)\nNidicolous(cob)\nHybrid(roseanne)\nImbecilic(juliette)\nApopemptic(juliette)\nApopemptic(juliette) -> Anamorphic(juliette)\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) and Anamorphic(x) -> Everyday(x))\n\nnot Everyday(cob)\n\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) and Anamorphic(x) -> Everyday(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Maryjane is paired. Maryjane is nuptial. Maryjane is puerperal. Maryjane is surgical. Elsey is paired. Cati is illicit. Cati is puerperal. If Cati is puerperal then Cati is defiant. All illicit, defiant people are parochial. Elsey is parochial.", "logic": "\nPaired(maryjane)\nNuptial(maryjane)\nPuerperal(maryjane)\nSurgical(maryjane)\nPaired(elsey)\nIllicit(cati)\nPuerperal(cati)\nPuerperal(cati) -> Defiant(cati)\nforall x (Illicit(x) and Defiant(x) -> Parochial(x))\n\nParochial(elsey)\n\nforall x (Illicit(x) and Defiant(x) -> Parochial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Lew is lowborn. Lew is phony. Lew is highflying. Lew is atrophied. Susann is lowborn. Ruella is spanking. Ruella is highflying. If Ruella is highflying then Ruella is outfitted. All spanking, outfitted people are parented. Susann is not atrophied.", "logic": "\nLowborn(lew)\nPhony(lew)\nHighflying(lew)\nAtrophied(lew)\nLowborn(susann)\nSpanking(ruella)\nHighflying(ruella)\nHighflying(ruella) -> Outfitted(ruella)\nforall x (Spanking(x) and Outfitted(x) -> Parented(x))\n\nnot Atrophied(susann)\n\nnot Atrophied(susann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Storm is organismic. Storm is cyprinoid. Storm is unchaste. Storm is stockinged. Barty is organismic. Shannah is mixed. Shannah is unchaste. If Shannah is unchaste then Shannah is waiting. All mixed, waiting people are writhing. Barty is waiting.", "logic": "\nOrganismic(storm)\nCyprinoid(storm)\nUnchaste(storm)\nStockinged(storm)\nOrganismic(barty)\nMixed(shannah)\nUnchaste(shannah)\nUnchaste(shannah) -> Waiting(shannah)\nforall x (Mixed(x) and Waiting(x) -> Writhing(x))\n\nWaiting(barty)\n\nWaiting(barty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Arda is demeaning. Arda is cordless. Arda is chatoyant. Arda is rancorous. Ashleigh is demeaning. Adella is bulgy. Adella is chatoyant. If Adella is chatoyant then Adella is axillary. All bulgy, axillary people are jeering. Ashleigh is not cordless.", "logic": "\nDemeaning(arda)\nCordless(arda)\nChatoyant(arda)\nRancorous(arda)\nDemeaning(ashleigh)\nBulgy(adella)\nChatoyant(adella)\nChatoyant(adella) -> Axillary(adella)\nforall x (Bulgy(x) and Axillary(x) -> Jeering(x))\n\nnot Cordless(ashleigh)\n\nnot Cordless(ashleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Mathilda is neoclassic. Mathilda is multiple. Mathilda is planetary. Mathilda is reassuring. Thornton is neoclassic. Gino is bimotored. Gino is planetary. If Gino is planetary then Gino is sinuous. All bimotored, sinuous people are sandaled. Gino is neoclassic.", "logic": "\nNeoclassic(mathilda)\nMultiple(mathilda)\nPlanetary(mathilda)\nReassuring(mathilda)\nNeoclassic(thornton)\nBimotored(gino)\nPlanetary(gino)\nPlanetary(gino) -> Sinuous(gino)\nforall x (Bimotored(x) and Sinuous(x) -> Sandaled(x))\n\nNeoclassic(gino)\n\nNeoclassic(gino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2233"} {"premises": "Christen is easygoing. Christen is wormlike. Alfonso is enlivening. Alfonso is easygoing. Alfonso is patent. Alfonso is respected. Anders is crannied. Anders is patent. Anders is respected. Anders is wormlike. If something is easygoing and patent then it is respected. If something is wormlike then it is crannied. If something is patent and easygoing then it is respected. All crannied, patent things are respected. If Anders is respected then Anders is wormlike. All patent things are alive. If something is patent then it is enlivening. All respected, enlivening things are easygoing. Christen is wormlike.", "logic": "\nEasygoing(christen)\nWormlike(christen)\nEnlivening(alfonso)\nEasygoing(alfonso)\nPatent(alfonso)\nRespected(alfonso)\nCrannied(anders)\nPatent(anders)\nRespected(anders)\nWormlike(anders)\nforall x (Easygoing(x) and Patent(x) -> Respected(x))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) and Easygoing(x) -> Respected(x))\nforall x (Crannied(x) and Patent(x) -> Respected(x))\nRespected(anders) -> Wormlike(anders)\nforall x (Patent(x) -> Alive(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) -> Enlivening(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) and Enlivening(x) -> Easygoing(x))\n\nWormlike(christen)\n\ntherefore Wormlike(christen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Benny is painted. Benny is submersed. Albert is adoptable. Albert is painted. Albert is eudemonic. Albert is vivid. Sharline is dubious. Sharline is eudemonic. Sharline is vivid. Sharline is submersed. If something is painted and eudemonic then it is vivid. If something is submersed then it is dubious. If something is eudemonic and painted then it is vivid. All dubious, eudemonic things are vivid. If Sharline is vivid then Sharline is submersed. All eudemonic things are inlaid. If something is eudemonic then it is adoptable. All vivid, adoptable things are painted. Sharline is not dubious.", "logic": "\nPainted(benny)\nSubmersed(benny)\nAdoptable(albert)\nPainted(albert)\nEudemonic(albert)\nVivid(albert)\nDubious(sharline)\nEudemonic(sharline)\nVivid(sharline)\nSubmersed(sharline)\nforall x (Painted(x) and Eudemonic(x) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Submersed(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) and Painted(x) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Dubious(x) and Eudemonic(x) -> Vivid(x))\nVivid(sharline) -> Submersed(sharline)\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) -> Inlaid(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Vivid(x) and Adoptable(x) -> Painted(x))\n\nnot Dubious(sharline)\n\ntherefore Dubious(sharline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Danika is alloyed. Danika is seamless. Helise is virtual. Helise is alloyed. Helise is hypothetic. Helise is infectious. Ofilia is cyclonical. Ofilia is hypothetic. Ofilia is infectious. Ofilia is seamless. If something is alloyed and hypothetic then it is infectious. If something is seamless then it is cyclonical. If something is hypothetic and alloyed then it is infectious. All cyclonical, hypothetic things are infectious. If Ofilia is infectious then Ofilia is seamless. All hypothetic things are palpable. If something is hypothetic then it is virtual. All infectious, virtual things are alloyed. Danika is cyclonical.", "logic": "\nAlloyed(danika)\nSeamless(danika)\nVirtual(helise)\nAlloyed(helise)\nHypothetic(helise)\nInfectious(helise)\nCyclonical(ofilia)\nHypothetic(ofilia)\nInfectious(ofilia)\nSeamless(ofilia)\nforall x (Alloyed(x) and Hypothetic(x) -> Infectious(x))\nforall x (Seamless(x) -> Cyclonical(x))\nforall x (Hypothetic(x) and Alloyed(x) -> Infectious(x))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) and Hypothetic(x) -> Infectious(x))\nInfectious(ofilia) -> Seamless(ofilia)\nforall x (Hypothetic(x) -> Palpable(x))\nforall x (Hypothetic(x) -> Virtual(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) and Virtual(x) -> Alloyed(x))\n\nCyclonical(danika)\n\nSeamless(danika) and forall x (Seamless(x) -> Cyclonical(x)) -> therefore Cyclonical(danika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Giffer is gimcrack. Giffer is diminutive. Lind is ownerless. Lind is gimcrack. Lind is tubal. Lind is unblinking. Orson is clawed. Orson is tubal. Orson is unblinking. Orson is diminutive. If something is gimcrack and tubal then it is unblinking. If something is diminutive then it is clawed. If something is tubal and gimcrack then it is unblinking. All clawed, tubal things are unblinking. If Orson is unblinking then Orson is diminutive. All tubal things are alkylic. If something is tubal then it is ownerless. All unblinking, ownerless things are gimcrack. Giffer is not clawed.", "logic": "\nGimcrack(giffer)\nDiminutive(giffer)\nOwnerless(lind)\nGimcrack(lind)\nTubal(lind)\nUnblinking(lind)\nClawed(orson)\nTubal(orson)\nUnblinking(orson)\nDiminutive(orson)\nforall x (Gimcrack(x) and Tubal(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Clawed(x))\nforall x (Tubal(x) and Gimcrack(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Clawed(x) and Tubal(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nUnblinking(orson) -> Diminutive(orson)\nforall x (Tubal(x) -> Alkylic(x))\nforall x (Tubal(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Unblinking(x) and Ownerless(x) -> Gimcrack(x))\n\nnot Clawed(giffer)\n\nDiminutive(giffer) and forall x (Diminutive(x) -> Clawed(x)) -> therefore Clawed(giffer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Abbie is frosted. Abbie is provincial. Kasey is undisputed. Kasey is frosted. Kasey is diverted. Kasey is westside. Robert is unmixed. Robert is diverted. Robert is westside. Robert is provincial. If something is frosted and diverted then it is westside. If something is provincial then it is unmixed. If something is diverted and frosted then it is westside. All unmixed, diverted things are westside. If Robert is westside then Robert is provincial. All diverted things are strict. If something is diverted then it is undisputed. All westside, undisputed things are frosted. Robert is frosted.", "logic": "\nFrosted(abbie)\nProvincial(abbie)\nUndisputed(kasey)\nFrosted(kasey)\nDiverted(kasey)\nWestside(kasey)\nUnmixed(robert)\nDiverted(robert)\nWestside(robert)\nProvincial(robert)\nforall x (Frosted(x) and Diverted(x) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Unmixed(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) and Frosted(x) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Unmixed(x) and Diverted(x) -> Westside(x))\nWestside(robert) -> Provincial(robert)\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Strict(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Undisputed(x))\nforall x (Westside(x) and Undisputed(x) -> Frosted(x))\n\nFrosted(robert)\n\nDiverted(robert) and forall x (Diverted(x) -> Undisputed(x)) -> therefore Undisputed(robert) Westside(robert) and Undisputed(robert) and forall x (Westside(x) and Undisputed(x) -> Frosted(x)) -> therefore Frosted(robert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Virge is calculable. Virge is aromatic. Sharona is viewable. Sharona is calculable. Sharona is fancied. Sharona is hottish. Boyce is bionic. Boyce is fancied. Boyce is hottish. Boyce is aromatic. If something is calculable and fancied then it is hottish. If something is aromatic then it is bionic. If something is fancied and calculable then it is hottish. All bionic, fancied things are hottish. If Boyce is hottish then Boyce is aromatic. All fancied things are lachrymose. If something is fancied then it is viewable. All hottish, viewable things are calculable. Boyce is not calculable.", "logic": "\nCalculable(virge)\nAromatic(virge)\nViewable(sharona)\nCalculable(sharona)\nFancied(sharona)\nHottish(sharona)\nBionic(boyce)\nFancied(boyce)\nHottish(boyce)\nAromatic(boyce)\nforall x (Calculable(x) and Fancied(x) -> Hottish(x))\nforall x (Aromatic(x) -> Bionic(x))\nforall x (Fancied(x) and Calculable(x) -> Hottish(x))\nforall x (Bionic(x) and Fancied(x) -> Hottish(x))\nHottish(boyce) -> Aromatic(boyce)\nforall x (Fancied(x) -> Lachrymose(x))\nforall x (Fancied(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Hottish(x) and Viewable(x) -> Calculable(x))\n\nnot Calculable(boyce)\n\nFancied(boyce) and forall x (Fancied(x) -> Viewable(x)) -> therefore Viewable(boyce) Hottish(boyce) and Viewable(boyce) and forall x (Hottish(x) and Viewable(x) -> Calculable(x)) -> therefore Calculable(boyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Fanchon is norse. Fanchon is included. Conney is calendric. Conney is norse. Conney is dashing. Conney is uncomplete. Brynne is eutrophic. Brynne is dashing. Brynne is uncomplete. Brynne is included. If something is norse and dashing then it is uncomplete. If something is included then it is eutrophic. If something is dashing and norse then it is uncomplete. All eutrophic, dashing things are uncomplete. If Brynne is uncomplete then Brynne is included. All dashing things are furled. If something is dashing then it is calendric. All uncomplete, calendric things are norse. Fanchon is not uncomplete.", "logic": "\nNorse(fanchon)\nIncluded(fanchon)\nCalendric(conney)\nNorse(conney)\nDashing(conney)\nUncomplete(conney)\nEutrophic(brynne)\nDashing(brynne)\nUncomplete(brynne)\nIncluded(brynne)\nforall x (Norse(x) and Dashing(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nforall x (Included(x) -> Eutrophic(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) and Norse(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nforall x (Eutrophic(x) and Dashing(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nUncomplete(brynne) -> Included(brynne)\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Furled(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Calendric(x) -> Norse(x))\n\nnot Uncomplete(fanchon)\n\nforall x (Norse(x) and Dashing(x) -> Uncomplete(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Carmen is despicable. Carmen is homely. Avis is ternary. Avis is despicable. Avis is sabbatic. Avis is spoilable. Dorey is centrical. Dorey is sabbatic. Dorey is spoilable. Dorey is homely. If something is despicable and sabbatic then it is spoilable. If something is homely then it is centrical. If something is sabbatic and despicable then it is spoilable. All centrical, sabbatic things are spoilable. If Dorey is spoilable then Dorey is homely. All sabbatic things are vocalic. If something is sabbatic then it is ternary. All spoilable, ternary things are despicable. Carmen is ternary.", "logic": "\nDespicable(carmen)\nHomely(carmen)\nTernary(avis)\nDespicable(avis)\nSabbatic(avis)\nSpoilable(avis)\nCentrical(dorey)\nSabbatic(dorey)\nSpoilable(dorey)\nHomely(dorey)\nforall x (Despicable(x) and Sabbatic(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Homely(x) -> Centrical(x))\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) and Despicable(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Centrical(x) and Sabbatic(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nSpoilable(dorey) -> Homely(dorey)\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Vocalic(x))\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Ternary(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) and Ternary(x) -> Despicable(x))\n\nTernary(carmen)\n\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Ternary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Ottilie is inaccurate. Ottilie is nodular. Flossy is honey. Flossy is inaccurate. Flossy is enclosed. Flossy is gruesome. Lizzy is fitter. Lizzy is enclosed. Lizzy is gruesome. Lizzy is nodular. If something is inaccurate and enclosed then it is gruesome. If something is nodular then it is fitter. If something is enclosed and inaccurate then it is gruesome. All fitter, enclosed things are gruesome. If Lizzy is gruesome then Lizzy is nodular. All enclosed things are lumbar. If something is enclosed then it is honey. All gruesome, honey things are inaccurate. Ottilie is not lumbar.", "logic": "\nInaccurate(ottilie)\nNodular(ottilie)\nHoney(flossy)\nInaccurate(flossy)\nEnclosed(flossy)\nGruesome(flossy)\nFitter(lizzy)\nEnclosed(lizzy)\nGruesome(lizzy)\nNodular(lizzy)\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) and Enclosed(x) -> Gruesome(x))\nforall x (Nodular(x) -> Fitter(x))\nforall x (Enclosed(x) and Inaccurate(x) -> Gruesome(x))\nforall x (Fitter(x) and Enclosed(x) -> Gruesome(x))\nGruesome(lizzy) -> Nodular(lizzy)\nforall x (Enclosed(x) -> Lumbar(x))\nforall x (Enclosed(x) -> Honey(x))\nforall x (Gruesome(x) and Honey(x) -> Inaccurate(x))\n\nnot Lumbar(ottilie)\n\nforall x (Enclosed(x) -> Lumbar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Karia is liverish. Karia is cyclonical. Oriana is shielded. Oriana is liverish. Oriana is bifurcate. Oriana is dismantled. Viva is befogged. Viva is bifurcate. Viva is dismantled. Viva is cyclonical. If something is liverish and bifurcate then it is dismantled. If something is cyclonical then it is befogged. If something is bifurcate and liverish then it is dismantled. All befogged, bifurcate things are dismantled. If Viva is dismantled then Viva is cyclonical. All bifurcate things are dear. If something is bifurcate then it is shielded. All dismantled, shielded things are liverish. Oriana is cyclonical.", "logic": "\nLiverish(karia)\nCyclonical(karia)\nShielded(oriana)\nLiverish(oriana)\nBifurcate(oriana)\nDismantled(oriana)\nBefogged(viva)\nBifurcate(viva)\nDismantled(viva)\nCyclonical(viva)\nforall x (Liverish(x) and Bifurcate(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) -> Befogged(x))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x) and Liverish(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nforall x (Befogged(x) and Bifurcate(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nDismantled(viva) -> Cyclonical(viva)\nforall x (Bifurcate(x) -> Dear(x))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x) -> Shielded(x))\nforall x (Dismantled(x) and Shielded(x) -> Liverish(x))\n\nCyclonical(oriana)\n\nCyclonical(oriana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-746"} {"premises": "Jermain is bipedal. Dody is coexistent. Dody is toughened. Morna is jagged. Rivkah is coexistent. Rivkah is pricey. Rivkah is bats. If Morna is bats and Morna is biannual then Morna is toughened. If something is bats and biannual then it is jagged. All jagged things are coexistent. If Morna is coexistent then Morna is biannual. Red, jagged things are coexistent. Furry things are biannual. Rivkah is coexistent.", "logic": "\nBipedal(jermain)\nCoexistent(dody)\nToughened(dody)\nJagged(morna)\nCoexistent(rivkah)\nPricey(rivkah)\nBats(rivkah)\nBats(morna) and Biannual(morna) -> Toughened(morna)\nforall x (Bats(x) and Biannual(x) -> Jagged(x))\nforall x (Jagged(x) -> Coexistent(x))\nCoexistent(morna) -> Biannual(morna)\nforall x (Bipedal(x) and Jagged(x) -> Coexistent(x))\nforall x (Pricey(x) -> Biannual(x))\n\nCoexistent(rivkah)\n\ntherefore Coexistent(rivkah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Guinna is cityfied. Morgen is inboard. Morgen is angulate. Waylen is preemptive. Katuscha is inboard. Katuscha is timed. Katuscha is endergonic. If Waylen is endergonic and Waylen is uphill then Waylen is angulate. If something is endergonic and uphill then it is preemptive. All preemptive things are inboard. If Waylen is inboard then Waylen is uphill. Red, preemptive things are inboard. Furry things are uphill. Waylen is not preemptive.", "logic": "\nCityfied(guinna)\nInboard(morgen)\nAngulate(morgen)\nPreemptive(waylen)\nInboard(katuscha)\nTimed(katuscha)\nEndergonic(katuscha)\nEndergonic(waylen) and Uphill(waylen) -> Angulate(waylen)\nforall x (Endergonic(x) and Uphill(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Preemptive(x) -> Inboard(x))\nInboard(waylen) -> Uphill(waylen)\nforall x (Cityfied(x) and Preemptive(x) -> Inboard(x))\nforall x (Timed(x) -> Uphill(x))\n\nnot Preemptive(waylen)\n\ntherefore Preemptive(waylen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Karrah is hoofed. Dyna is generous. Dyna is dependable. Rosanne is spiritual. Barris is generous. Barris is socratic. Barris is healing. If Rosanne is healing and Rosanne is mineral then Rosanne is dependable. If something is healing and mineral then it is spiritual. All spiritual things are generous. If Rosanne is generous then Rosanne is mineral. Red, spiritual things are generous. Furry things are mineral. Rosanne is generous.", "logic": "\nHoofed(karrah)\nGenerous(dyna)\nDependable(dyna)\nSpiritual(rosanne)\nGenerous(barris)\nSocratic(barris)\nHealing(barris)\nHealing(rosanne) and Mineral(rosanne) -> Dependable(rosanne)\nforall x (Healing(x) and Mineral(x) -> Spiritual(x))\nforall x (Spiritual(x) -> Generous(x))\nGenerous(rosanne) -> Mineral(rosanne)\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Spiritual(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Socratic(x) -> Mineral(x))\n\nGenerous(rosanne)\n\nSpiritual(rosanne) and forall x (Spiritual(x) -> Generous(x)) -> therefore Generous(rosanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Tildi is masculine. Belicia is versatile. Belicia is deductive. Ruperta is apothecial. Veronica is versatile. Veronica is seasick. Veronica is impressed. If Ruperta is impressed and Ruperta is boskopoid then Ruperta is deductive. If something is impressed and boskopoid then it is apothecial. All apothecial things are versatile. If Ruperta is versatile then Ruperta is boskopoid. Red, apothecial things are versatile. Furry things are boskopoid. Veronica is not boskopoid.", "logic": "\nMasculine(tildi)\nVersatile(belicia)\nDeductive(belicia)\nApothecial(ruperta)\nVersatile(veronica)\nSeasick(veronica)\nImpressed(veronica)\nImpressed(ruperta) and Boskopoid(ruperta) -> Deductive(ruperta)\nforall x (Impressed(x) and Boskopoid(x) -> Apothecial(x))\nforall x (Apothecial(x) -> Versatile(x))\nVersatile(ruperta) -> Boskopoid(ruperta)\nforall x (Masculine(x) and Apothecial(x) -> Versatile(x))\nforall x (Seasick(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\n\nnot Boskopoid(veronica)\n\nSeasick(veronica) and forall x (Seasick(x) -> Boskopoid(x)) -> therefore Boskopoid(veronica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Thalia is frowsty. Leland is flukey. Leland is ungallant. Waiter is cursive. Larina is flukey. Larina is stubbled. Larina is unbaffled. If Waiter is unbaffled and Waiter is bisontine then Waiter is ungallant. If something is unbaffled and bisontine then it is cursive. All cursive things are flukey. If Waiter is flukey then Waiter is bisontine. Red, cursive things are flukey. Furry things are bisontine. Waiter is bisontine.", "logic": "\nFrowsty(thalia)\nFlukey(leland)\nUngallant(leland)\nCursive(waiter)\nFlukey(larina)\nStubbled(larina)\nUnbaffled(larina)\nUnbaffled(waiter) and Bisontine(waiter) -> Ungallant(waiter)\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) and Bisontine(x) -> Cursive(x))\nforall x (Cursive(x) -> Flukey(x))\nFlukey(waiter) -> Bisontine(waiter)\nforall x (Frowsty(x) and Cursive(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) -> Bisontine(x))\n\nBisontine(waiter)\n\nCursive(waiter) and forall x (Cursive(x) -> Flukey(x)) -> therefore Flukey(waiter) Flukey(waiter) and Flukey(waiter) -> Bisontine(waiter) -> therefore Bisontine(waiter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Jannel is narrow. Lenora is roadless. Lenora is filmed. Joanne is approving. Isadore is roadless. Isadore is bettering. Isadore is suasible. If Joanne is suasible and Joanne is responsive then Joanne is filmed. If something is suasible and responsive then it is approving. All approving things are roadless. If Joanne is roadless then Joanne is responsive. Red, approving things are roadless. Furry things are responsive. Isadore is not approving.", "logic": "\nNarrow(jannel)\nRoadless(lenora)\nFilmed(lenora)\nApproving(joanne)\nRoadless(isadore)\nBettering(isadore)\nSuasible(isadore)\nSuasible(joanne) and Responsive(joanne) -> Filmed(joanne)\nforall x (Suasible(x) and Responsive(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Approving(x) -> Roadless(x))\nRoadless(joanne) -> Responsive(joanne)\nforall x (Narrow(x) and Approving(x) -> Roadless(x))\nforall x (Bettering(x) -> Responsive(x))\n\nnot Approving(isadore)\n\nBettering(isadore) and forall x (Bettering(x) -> Responsive(x)) -> therefore Responsive(isadore) Suasible(isadore) and Responsive(isadore) and forall x (Suasible(x) and Responsive(x) -> Approving(x)) -> therefore Approving(isadore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Burta is caespitose. Shamus is labouring. Shamus is smoldering. Harvie is epistemic. Britte is labouring. Britte is narial. Britte is nauseated. If Harvie is nauseated and Harvie is snuffly then Harvie is smoldering. If something is nauseated and snuffly then it is epistemic. All epistemic things are labouring. If Harvie is labouring then Harvie is snuffly. Red, epistemic things are labouring. Furry things are snuffly. Harvie is not smoldering.", "logic": "\nCaespitose(burta)\nLabouring(shamus)\nSmoldering(shamus)\nEpistemic(harvie)\nLabouring(britte)\nNarial(britte)\nNauseated(britte)\nNauseated(harvie) and Snuffly(harvie) -> Smoldering(harvie)\nforall x (Nauseated(x) and Snuffly(x) -> Epistemic(x))\nforall x (Epistemic(x) -> Labouring(x))\nLabouring(harvie) -> Snuffly(harvie)\nforall x (Caespitose(x) and Epistemic(x) -> Labouring(x))\nforall x (Narial(x) -> Snuffly(x))\n\nnot Smoldering(harvie)\n\nNauseated(harvie) and Snuffly(harvie) -> Smoldering(harvie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Wheeler is logistic. Griff is untrusty. Griff is beaked. Abigael is muhammadan. Kakalina is untrusty. Kakalina is wizardly. Kakalina is ninepenny. If Abigael is ninepenny and Abigael is tethered then Abigael is beaked. If something is ninepenny and tethered then it is muhammadan. All muhammadan things are untrusty. If Abigael is untrusty then Abigael is tethered. Red, muhammadan things are untrusty. Furry things are tethered. Griff is muhammadan.", "logic": "\nLogistic(wheeler)\nUntrusty(griff)\nBeaked(griff)\nMuhammadan(abigael)\nUntrusty(kakalina)\nWizardly(kakalina)\nNinepenny(kakalina)\nNinepenny(abigael) and Tethered(abigael) -> Beaked(abigael)\nforall x (Ninepenny(x) and Tethered(x) -> Muhammadan(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Untrusty(x))\nUntrusty(abigael) -> Tethered(abigael)\nforall x (Logistic(x) and Muhammadan(x) -> Untrusty(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Tethered(x))\n\nMuhammadan(griff)\n\nforall x (Ninepenny(x) and Tethered(x) -> Muhammadan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Yankee is immediate. Hollis is disgraced. Hollis is passing. Thatch is knightly. Andee is disgraced. Andee is abnormal. Andee is geriatric. If Thatch is geriatric and Thatch is slavish then Thatch is passing. If something is geriatric and slavish then it is knightly. All knightly things are disgraced. If Thatch is disgraced then Thatch is slavish. Red, knightly things are disgraced. Furry things are slavish. Yankee is not slavish.", "logic": "\nImmediate(yankee)\nDisgraced(hollis)\nPassing(hollis)\nKnightly(thatch)\nDisgraced(andee)\nAbnormal(andee)\nGeriatric(andee)\nGeriatric(thatch) and Slavish(thatch) -> Passing(thatch)\nforall x (Geriatric(x) and Slavish(x) -> Knightly(x))\nforall x (Knightly(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nDisgraced(thatch) -> Slavish(thatch)\nforall x (Immediate(x) and Knightly(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Abnormal(x) -> Slavish(x))\n\nnot Slavish(yankee)\n\nforall x (Abnormal(x) -> Slavish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Cam is befitting. Weslie is dampish. Weslie is categoric. Carlene is midland. Pierre is dampish. Pierre is angulate. Pierre is effortless. If Carlene is effortless and Carlene is existent then Carlene is categoric. If something is effortless and existent then it is midland. All midland things are dampish. If Carlene is dampish then Carlene is existent. Red, midland things are dampish. Furry things are existent. Weslie is effortless.", "logic": "\nBefitting(cam)\nDampish(weslie)\nCategoric(weslie)\nMidland(carlene)\nDampish(pierre)\nAngulate(pierre)\nEffortless(pierre)\nEffortless(carlene) and Existent(carlene) -> Categoric(carlene)\nforall x (Effortless(x) and Existent(x) -> Midland(x))\nforall x (Midland(x) -> Dampish(x))\nDampish(carlene) -> Existent(carlene)\nforall x (Befitting(x) and Midland(x) -> Dampish(x))\nforall x (Angulate(x) -> Existent(x))\n\nEffortless(weslie)\n\nEffortless(weslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Ginny is memorable. Lorain is uncouth. Lorain is dispersed. Dino is reptilian. Pacifica is uncouth. Pacifica is beamish. Pacifica is cuboid. If Dino is cuboid and Dino is tamil then Dino is dispersed. If something is cuboid and tamil then it is reptilian. All reptilian things are uncouth. If Dino is uncouth then Dino is tamil. Red, reptilian things are uncouth. Furry things are tamil. Lorain is not memorable.", "logic": "\nMemorable(ginny)\nUncouth(lorain)\nDispersed(lorain)\nReptilian(dino)\nUncouth(pacifica)\nBeamish(pacifica)\nCuboid(pacifica)\nCuboid(dino) and Tamil(dino) -> Dispersed(dino)\nforall x (Cuboid(x) and Tamil(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Reptilian(x) -> Uncouth(x))\nUncouth(dino) -> Tamil(dino)\nforall x (Memorable(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Uncouth(x))\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> Tamil(x))\n\nnot Memorable(lorain)\n\nnot Memorable(lorain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Renaldo is tangy. Cris is edematous. Cris is ungodly. Mimi is endergonic. Moyna is edematous. Moyna is pulpy. Moyna is winded. If Mimi is winded and Mimi is binding then Mimi is ungodly. If something is winded and binding then it is endergonic. All endergonic things are edematous. If Mimi is edematous then Mimi is binding. Red, endergonic things are edematous. Furry things are binding. Renaldo is pulpy.", "logic": "\nTangy(renaldo)\nEdematous(cris)\nUngodly(cris)\nEndergonic(mimi)\nEdematous(moyna)\nPulpy(moyna)\nWinded(moyna)\nWinded(mimi) and Binding(mimi) -> Ungodly(mimi)\nforall x (Winded(x) and Binding(x) -> Endergonic(x))\nforall x (Endergonic(x) -> Edematous(x))\nEdematous(mimi) -> Binding(mimi)\nforall x (Tangy(x) and Endergonic(x) -> Edematous(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) -> Binding(x))\n\nPulpy(renaldo)\n\nPulpy(renaldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-171"} {"premises": "Rudyard is planned. Teador is planned. Leandra is wizen. Jess is planned. All planned things are cresson. If something is apologetic and planned then it is cynical. Young things are apologetic. If Leandra is twilight then Leandra is wizen. All cresson things are wizen. If Leandra is cynical then Leandra is apologetic. Leandra is wizen.", "logic": "\nPlanned(rudyard)\nPlanned(teador)\nWizen(leandra)\nPlanned(jess)\nforall x (Planned(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) and Planned(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Twilight(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nTwilight(leandra) -> Wizen(leandra)\nforall x (Cresson(x) -> Wizen(x))\nCynical(leandra) -> Apologetic(leandra)\n\nWizen(leandra)\n\ntherefore Wizen(leandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Erina is saharan. Veriee is saharan. Nadean is nominative. Quintina is saharan. All saharan things are glistening. If something is charitable and saharan then it is corky. Young things are charitable. If Nadean is pedagogic then Nadean is nominative. All glistening things are nominative. If Nadean is corky then Nadean is charitable. Nadean is not nominative.", "logic": "\nSaharan(erina)\nSaharan(veriee)\nNominative(nadean)\nSaharan(quintina)\nforall x (Saharan(x) -> Glistening(x))\nforall x (Charitable(x) and Saharan(x) -> Corky(x))\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Charitable(x))\nPedagogic(nadean) -> Nominative(nadean)\nforall x (Glistening(x) -> Nominative(x))\nCorky(nadean) -> Charitable(nadean)\n\nnot Nominative(nadean)\n\ntherefore Nominative(nadean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Ben is unexpired. Randolph is unexpired. Jerrilyn is austrian. Elric is unexpired. All unexpired things are parental. If something is esurient and unexpired then it is eukaryotic. Young things are esurient. If Jerrilyn is prototypic then Jerrilyn is austrian. All parental things are austrian. If Jerrilyn is eukaryotic then Jerrilyn is esurient. Elric is parental.", "logic": "\nUnexpired(ben)\nUnexpired(randolph)\nAustrian(jerrilyn)\nUnexpired(elric)\nforall x (Unexpired(x) -> Parental(x))\nforall x (Esurient(x) and Unexpired(x) -> Eukaryotic(x))\nforall x (Prototypic(x) -> Esurient(x))\nPrototypic(jerrilyn) -> Austrian(jerrilyn)\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Austrian(x))\nEukaryotic(jerrilyn) -> Esurient(jerrilyn)\n\nParental(elric)\n\nUnexpired(elric) and forall x (Unexpired(x) -> Parental(x)) -> therefore Parental(elric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Sheffy is equipotent. Robert is equipotent. Karylin is elemental. Eugene is equipotent. All equipotent things are tectonic. If something is virtuoso and equipotent then it is octuple. Young things are virtuoso. If Karylin is surpliced then Karylin is elemental. All tectonic things are elemental. If Karylin is octuple then Karylin is virtuoso. Eugene is not tectonic.", "logic": "\nEquipotent(sheffy)\nEquipotent(robert)\nElemental(karylin)\nEquipotent(eugene)\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) and Equipotent(x) -> Octuple(x))\nforall x (Surpliced(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nSurpliced(karylin) -> Elemental(karylin)\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Elemental(x))\nOctuple(karylin) -> Virtuoso(karylin)\n\nnot Tectonic(eugene)\n\nEquipotent(eugene) and forall x (Equipotent(x) -> Tectonic(x)) -> therefore Tectonic(eugene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Giorgi is timbered. Ceil is timbered. Kassandra is dietary. Gifford is timbered. All timbered things are velvet. If something is annalistic and timbered then it is burrlike. Young things are annalistic. If Kassandra is soppy then Kassandra is dietary. All velvet things are dietary. If Kassandra is burrlike then Kassandra is annalistic. Ceil is dietary.", "logic": "\nTimbered(giorgi)\nTimbered(ceil)\nDietary(kassandra)\nTimbered(gifford)\nforall x (Timbered(x) -> Velvet(x))\nforall x (Annalistic(x) and Timbered(x) -> Burrlike(x))\nforall x (Soppy(x) -> Annalistic(x))\nSoppy(kassandra) -> Dietary(kassandra)\nforall x (Velvet(x) -> Dietary(x))\nBurrlike(kassandra) -> Annalistic(kassandra)\n\nDietary(ceil)\n\nTimbered(ceil) and forall x (Timbered(x) -> Velvet(x)) -> therefore Velvet(ceil) Velvet(ceil) and forall x (Velvet(x) -> Dietary(x)) -> therefore Dietary(ceil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Cassandre is aboulic. Alicea is aboulic. Xylia is elemental. Madeline is aboulic. All aboulic things are contrived. If something is pebbly and aboulic then it is muggy. Young things are pebbly. If Xylia is valved then Xylia is elemental. All contrived things are elemental. If Xylia is muggy then Xylia is pebbly. Madeline is not elemental.", "logic": "\nAboulic(cassandre)\nAboulic(alicea)\nElemental(xylia)\nAboulic(madeline)\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Contrived(x))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) and Aboulic(x) -> Muggy(x))\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nValved(xylia) -> Elemental(xylia)\nforall x (Contrived(x) -> Elemental(x))\nMuggy(xylia) -> Pebbly(xylia)\n\nnot Elemental(madeline)\n\nAboulic(madeline) and forall x (Aboulic(x) -> Contrived(x)) -> therefore Contrived(madeline) Contrived(madeline) and forall x (Contrived(x) -> Elemental(x)) -> therefore Elemental(madeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Fanni is soured. Elias is soured. Tasia is moderating. Bucky is soured. All soured things are reductive. If something is ergodic and soured then it is kayoed. Young things are ergodic. If Tasia is gauntleted then Tasia is moderating. All reductive things are moderating. If Tasia is kayoed then Tasia is ergodic. Tasia is not ergodic.", "logic": "\nSoured(fanni)\nSoured(elias)\nModerating(tasia)\nSoured(bucky)\nforall x (Soured(x) -> Reductive(x))\nforall x (Ergodic(x) and Soured(x) -> Kayoed(x))\nforall x (Gauntleted(x) -> Ergodic(x))\nGauntleted(tasia) -> Moderating(tasia)\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Moderating(x))\nKayoed(tasia) -> Ergodic(tasia)\n\nnot Ergodic(tasia)\n\nKayoed(tasia) -> Ergodic(tasia) <- forall x (Ergodic(x) and Soured(x) -> Kayoed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Eilis is flaxen. Leilah is flaxen. Ernaline is flashy. Parke is flaxen. All flaxen things are pillaged. If something is saccadic and flaxen then it is bimotored. Young things are saccadic. If Ernaline is lancelike then Ernaline is flashy. All pillaged things are flashy. If Ernaline is bimotored then Ernaline is saccadic. Parke is bimotored.", "logic": "\nFlaxen(eilis)\nFlaxen(leilah)\nFlashy(ernaline)\nFlaxen(parke)\nforall x (Flaxen(x) -> Pillaged(x))\nforall x (Saccadic(x) and Flaxen(x) -> Bimotored(x))\nforall x (Lancelike(x) -> Saccadic(x))\nLancelike(ernaline) -> Flashy(ernaline)\nforall x (Pillaged(x) -> Flashy(x))\nBimotored(ernaline) -> Saccadic(ernaline)\n\nBimotored(parke)\n\nforall x (Saccadic(x) and Flaxen(x) -> Bimotored(x)) <- forall x (Lancelike(x) -> Saccadic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Ehud is sore. Emanuela is sore. Chan is drudging. Isador is sore. All sore things are kaput. If something is brimful and sore then it is miffed. Young things are brimful. If Chan is renewing then Chan is drudging. All kaput things are drudging. If Chan is miffed then Chan is brimful. Emanuela is not miffed.", "logic": "\nSore(ehud)\nSore(emanuela)\nDrudging(chan)\nSore(isador)\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Kaput(x))\nforall x (Brimful(x) and Sore(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Renewing(x) -> Brimful(x))\nRenewing(chan) -> Drudging(chan)\nforall x (Kaput(x) -> Drudging(x))\nMiffed(chan) -> Brimful(chan)\n\nnot Miffed(emanuela)\n\nforall x (Brimful(x) and Sore(x) -> Miffed(x)) <- forall x (Renewing(x) -> Brimful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Ephram is airtight. Hewitt is airtight. Adriena is bedrid. Merl is airtight. All airtight things are catarrhine. If something is pale and airtight then it is euphonic. Young things are pale. If Adriena is quadruped then Adriena is bedrid. All catarrhine things are bedrid. If Adriena is euphonic then Adriena is pale. Hewitt is round.", "logic": "\nAirtight(ephram)\nAirtight(hewitt)\nBedrid(adriena)\nAirtight(merl)\nforall x (Airtight(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) and Airtight(x) -> Euphonic(x))\nforall x (Quadruped(x) -> Pale(x))\nQuadruped(adriena) -> Bedrid(adriena)\nforall x (Catarrhine(x) -> Bedrid(x))\nEuphonic(adriena) -> Pale(adriena)\n\nRound(hewitt)\n\nRound(hewitt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Davidson is slanting. Eleanor is slanting. Cole is despoiled. Janus is slanting. All slanting things are antithetic. If something is unstable and slanting then it is ocellated. Young things are unstable. If Cole is flip then Cole is despoiled. All antithetic things are despoiled. If Cole is ocellated then Cole is unstable. Eleanor is not flip.", "logic": "\nSlanting(davidson)\nSlanting(eleanor)\nDespoiled(cole)\nSlanting(janus)\nforall x (Slanting(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Unstable(x) and Slanting(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Unstable(x))\nFlip(cole) -> Despoiled(cole)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Despoiled(x))\nOcellated(cole) -> Unstable(cole)\n\nnot Flip(eleanor)\n\nnot Flip(eleanor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Natasha is chapped. Quentin is chapped. Ephrem is altissimo. Thurston is chapped. All chapped things are anomalous. If something is delightful and chapped then it is openhanded. Young things are delightful. If Ephrem is airheaded then Ephrem is altissimo. All anomalous things are altissimo. If Ephrem is openhanded then Ephrem is delightful. Thurston is round.", "logic": "\nChapped(natasha)\nChapped(quentin)\nAltissimo(ephrem)\nChapped(thurston)\nforall x (Chapped(x) -> Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Delightful(x) and Chapped(x) -> Openhanded(x))\nforall x (Airheaded(x) -> Delightful(x))\nAirheaded(ephrem) -> Altissimo(ephrem)\nforall x (Anomalous(x) -> Altissimo(x))\nOpenhanded(ephrem) -> Delightful(ephrem)\n\nRound(thurston)\n\nRound(thurston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-789"} {"premises": "Kathrine is honey. Herb is clxx. Ericha is stabbing. Ania is clxx. If someone is stabbing then they are careless. All clxx people are stabbing. Ania is clxx.", "logic": "\nHoney(kathrine)\nClxx(herb)\nStabbing(ericha)\nClxx(ania)\nforall x (Stabbing(x) -> Careless(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Stabbing(x))\n\nClxx(ania)\n\ntherefore Clxx(ania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Sandye is emblematic. Matilda is aerolitic. Jobey is carven. Saraann is aerolitic. If someone is carven then they are observant. All aerolitic people are carven. Sandye is not emblematic.", "logic": "\nEmblematic(sandye)\nAerolitic(matilda)\nCarven(jobey)\nAerolitic(saraann)\nforall x (Carven(x) -> Observant(x))\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Carven(x))\n\nnot Emblematic(sandye)\n\ntherefore Emblematic(sandye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Frederick is wavering. Carol is uncoerced. Gav is undersize. Osborn is uncoerced. If someone is undersize then they are butyric. All uncoerced people are undersize. Osborn is undersize.", "logic": "\nWavering(frederick)\nUncoerced(carol)\nUndersize(gav)\nUncoerced(osborn)\nforall x (Undersize(x) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Undersize(x))\n\nUndersize(osborn)\n\nUncoerced(osborn) and forall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Undersize(x)) -> therefore Undersize(osborn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Bessie is stonelike. Tessi is biotypic. Steve is annelid. Averil is biotypic. If someone is annelid then they are romance. All biotypic people are annelid. Averil is not annelid.", "logic": "\nStonelike(bessie)\nBiotypic(tessi)\nAnnelid(steve)\nBiotypic(averil)\nforall x (Annelid(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Biotypic(x) -> Annelid(x))\n\nnot Annelid(averil)\n\nBiotypic(averil) and forall x (Biotypic(x) -> Annelid(x)) -> therefore Annelid(averil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Daffy is anaglyptic. Arvind is clamorous. Wojciech is afrikaans. Gwenneth is clamorous. If someone is afrikaans then they are threadbare. All clamorous people are afrikaans. Arvind is threadbare.", "logic": "\nAnaglyptic(daffy)\nClamorous(arvind)\nAfrikaans(wojciech)\nClamorous(gwenneth)\nforall x (Afrikaans(x) -> Threadbare(x))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\n\nThreadbare(arvind)\n\nClamorous(arvind) and forall x (Clamorous(x) -> Afrikaans(x)) -> therefore Afrikaans(arvind) Afrikaans(arvind) and forall x (Afrikaans(x) -> Threadbare(x)) -> therefore Threadbare(arvind)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Theobald is haploidic. Oberon is untold. Shannah is adjunct. Ezra is untold. If someone is adjunct then they are swart. All untold people are adjunct. Oberon is not swart.", "logic": "\nHaploidic(theobald)\nUntold(oberon)\nAdjunct(shannah)\nUntold(ezra)\nforall x (Adjunct(x) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Adjunct(x))\n\nnot Swart(oberon)\n\nUntold(oberon) and forall x (Untold(x) -> Adjunct(x)) -> therefore Adjunct(oberon) Adjunct(oberon) and forall x (Adjunct(x) -> Swart(x)) -> therefore Swart(oberon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Andi is slippery. Brody is incan. Reginald is motorless. Livia is incan. If someone is motorless then they are tracheal. All incan people are motorless. Andi is not tracheal.", "logic": "\nSlippery(andi)\nIncan(brody)\nMotorless(reginald)\nIncan(livia)\nforall x (Motorless(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) -> Motorless(x))\n\nnot Tracheal(andi)\n\nforall x (Motorless(x) -> Tracheal(x)) <- forall x (Incan(x) -> Motorless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Loralie is wholemeal. Nydia is abject. Rosina is ossiculate. Brande is abject. If someone is ossiculate then they are violable. All abject people are ossiculate. Loralie is ossiculate.", "logic": "\nWholemeal(loralie)\nAbject(nydia)\nOssiculate(rosina)\nAbject(brande)\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Violable(x))\nforall x (Abject(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\n\nOssiculate(loralie)\n\nforall x (Abject(x) -> Ossiculate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Fifi is scorching. Magdalena is trigonal. Blanca is fell. Jewelle is trigonal. If someone is fell then they are speckled. All trigonal people are fell. Jewelle is not white.", "logic": "\nScorching(fifi)\nTrigonal(magdalena)\nFell(blanca)\nTrigonal(jewelle)\nforall x (Fell(x) -> Speckled(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> Fell(x))\n\nnot White(jewelle)\n\nnot White(jewelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Geoffrey is angolan. Cami is hyperfine. Lee is heraldic. Kinna is hyperfine. If someone is heraldic then they are bionic. All hyperfine people are heraldic. Cami is quiet.", "logic": "\nAngolan(geoffrey)\nHyperfine(cami)\nHeraldic(lee)\nHyperfine(kinna)\nforall x (Heraldic(x) -> Bionic(x))\nforall x (Hyperfine(x) -> Heraldic(x))\n\nQuiet(cami)\n\nQuiet(cami) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Mattheus is underslung. Reginald is panicled. Murielle is corded. Carlos is panicled. If someone is corded then they are unhewn. All panicled people are corded. Mattheus is not panicled.", "logic": "\nUnderslung(mattheus)\nPanicled(reginald)\nCorded(murielle)\nPanicled(carlos)\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Unhewn(x))\nforall x (Panicled(x) -> Corded(x))\n\nnot Panicled(mattheus)\n\nnot Panicled(mattheus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "Eveleen is cyclical. Bev is narcotised. Ulick is gainful. Amandy is narcotised. If someone is gainful then they are arboresque. All narcotised people are gainful. Ulick is narcotised.", "logic": "\nCyclical(eveleen)\nNarcotised(bev)\nGainful(ulick)\nNarcotised(amandy)\nforall x (Gainful(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Narcotised(x) -> Gainful(x))\n\nNarcotised(ulick)\n\nNarcotised(ulick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-477"} {"premises": "The chastity is mesolithic. The jennette fend the kare. The jennette is envious. The jennette is not mesolithic. The jennette down the chastity. The jennette down the kare. The kare fend the jennette. The kare fend the lulu. The kare is not apostolic. The kare is barbarous. The kare is mesolithic. The kare is metallic. The kare down the lulu. The lulu does not chase the chastity. The lulu is not envious. The lulu face the chastity. If something face the kare then the kare is apostolic. If the chastity is mesolithic then the chastity fend the kare. If something fend the kare then it is barbarous. The jennette down the chastity.", "logic": "\nMesolithic(chastity)\nFend(jennette, kare)\nEnvious(jennette)\nnot Mesolithic(jennette)\nDown(jennette, chastity)\nDown(jennette, kare)\nFend(kare, jennette)\nFend(kare, lulu)\nnot Apostolic(kare)\nBarbarous(kare)\nMesolithic(kare)\nMetallic(kare)\nDown(kare, lulu)\nnot Fend(lulu, chastity)\nnot Envious(lulu)\nFace(lulu, chastity)\nforall x (Face(x, kare) -> Apostolic(kare))\nMesolithic(chastity) -> Fend(chastity, kare)\nforall x (Fend(x, kare) -> Barbarous(x))\n\nDown(jennette, chastity)\n\ntherefore Down(jennette, chastity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The kyla is sunrise. The townsend spoon the mace. The townsend is adamant. The townsend is not sunrise. The townsend refrain the kyla. The townsend refrain the mace. The mace spoon the townsend. The mace spoon the lona. The mace is not such. The mace is inactive. The mace is sunrise. The mace is hammered. The mace refrain the lona. The lona does not chase the kyla. The lona is not adamant. The lona enthrall the kyla. If something enthrall the mace then the mace is such. If the kyla is sunrise then the kyla spoon the mace. If something spoon the mace then it is inactive. The mace is such.", "logic": "\nSunrise(kyla)\nSpoon(townsend, mace)\nAdamant(townsend)\nnot Sunrise(townsend)\nRefrain(townsend, kyla)\nRefrain(townsend, mace)\nSpoon(mace, townsend)\nSpoon(mace, lona)\nnot Such(mace)\nInactive(mace)\nSunrise(mace)\nHammered(mace)\nRefrain(mace, lona)\nnot Spoon(lona, kyla)\nnot Adamant(lona)\nEnthrall(lona, kyla)\nforall x (Enthrall(x, mace) -> Such(mace))\nSunrise(kyla) -> Spoon(kyla, mace)\nforall x (Spoon(x, mace) -> Inactive(x))\n\nSuch(mace)\n\ntherefore not Such(mace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The gabrila is spermous. The gwenny sheathe the gloriane. The gwenny is imbalanced. The gwenny is not spermous. The gwenny hive the gabrila. The gwenny hive the gloriane. The gloriane sheathe the gwenny. The gloriane sheathe the rani. The gloriane is not polemical. The gloriane is slicked. The gloriane is spermous. The gloriane is moving. The gloriane hive the rani. The rani does not chase the gabrila. The rani is not imbalanced. The rani usurp the gabrila. If something usurp the gloriane then the gloriane is polemical. If the gabrila is spermous then the gabrila sheathe the gloriane. If something sheathe the gloriane then it is slicked. The gwenny is slicked.", "logic": "\nSpermous(gabrila)\nSheathe(gwenny, gloriane)\nImbalanced(gwenny)\nnot Spermous(gwenny)\nHive(gwenny, gabrila)\nHive(gwenny, gloriane)\nSheathe(gloriane, gwenny)\nSheathe(gloriane, rani)\nnot Polemical(gloriane)\nSlicked(gloriane)\nSpermous(gloriane)\nMoving(gloriane)\nHive(gloriane, rani)\nnot Sheathe(rani, gabrila)\nnot Imbalanced(rani)\nUsurp(rani, gabrila)\nforall x (Usurp(x, gloriane) -> Polemical(gloriane))\nSpermous(gabrila) -> Sheathe(gabrila, gloriane)\nforall x (Sheathe(x, gloriane) -> Slicked(x))\n\nSlicked(gwenny)\n\nSheathe(gwenny, gloriane) and forall x (Sheathe(x, gloriane) -> Slicked(x)) -> therefore Slicked(gwenny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The florri is stranded. The carlen rate the claudette. The carlen is horned. The carlen is not stranded. The carlen plonk the florri. The carlen plonk the claudette. The claudette rate the carlen. The claudette rate the kathleen. The claudette is not techy. The claudette is nonracist. The claudette is stranded. The claudette is gooey. The claudette plonk the kathleen. The kathleen does not chase the florri. The kathleen is not horned. The kathleen tape the florri. If something tape the claudette then the claudette is techy. If the florri is stranded then the florri rate the claudette. If something rate the claudette then it is nonracist. The florri does not chase the claudette.", "logic": "\nStranded(florri)\nRate(carlen, claudette)\nHorned(carlen)\nnot Stranded(carlen)\nPlonk(carlen, florri)\nPlonk(carlen, claudette)\nRate(claudette, carlen)\nRate(claudette, kathleen)\nnot Techy(claudette)\nNonracist(claudette)\nStranded(claudette)\nGooey(claudette)\nPlonk(claudette, kathleen)\nnot Rate(kathleen, florri)\nnot Horned(kathleen)\nTape(kathleen, florri)\nforall x (Tape(x, claudette) -> Techy(claudette))\nStranded(florri) -> Rate(florri, claudette)\nforall x (Rate(x, claudette) -> Nonracist(x))\n\nnot Rate(florri, claudette)\n\nStranded(florri) and Stranded(florri) -> Rate(florri, claudette) -> therefore Rate(florri, claudette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The gunilla is unkindled. The courtney whale the melessa. The courtney is demanding. The courtney is not unkindled. The courtney summer the gunilla. The courtney summer the melessa. The melessa whale the courtney. The melessa whale the lothar. The melessa is not swelled. The melessa is such. The melessa is unkindled. The melessa is rich. The melessa summer the lothar. The lothar does not chase the gunilla. The lothar is not demanding. The lothar transduce the gunilla. If something transduce the melessa then the melessa is swelled. If the gunilla is unkindled then the gunilla whale the melessa. If something whale the melessa then it is such. The gunilla is such.", "logic": "\nUnkindled(gunilla)\nWhale(courtney, melessa)\nDemanding(courtney)\nnot Unkindled(courtney)\nSummer(courtney, gunilla)\nSummer(courtney, melessa)\nWhale(melessa, courtney)\nWhale(melessa, lothar)\nnot Swelled(melessa)\nSuch(melessa)\nUnkindled(melessa)\nRich(melessa)\nSummer(melessa, lothar)\nnot Whale(lothar, gunilla)\nnot Demanding(lothar)\nTransduce(lothar, gunilla)\nforall x (Transduce(x, melessa) -> Swelled(melessa))\nUnkindled(gunilla) -> Whale(gunilla, melessa)\nforall x (Whale(x, melessa) -> Such(x))\n\nSuch(gunilla)\n\nUnkindled(gunilla) and Unkindled(gunilla) -> Whale(gunilla, melessa) -> therefore Whale(gunilla, melessa) Whale(gunilla, melessa) and forall x (Whale(x, melessa) -> Such(x)) -> therefore Such(gunilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The yanaton is chylous. The tome hook the raye. The tome is chemic. The tome is not chylous. The tome affiliate the yanaton. The tome affiliate the raye. The raye hook the tome. The raye hook the rich. The raye is not resilient. The raye is held. The raye is chylous. The raye is brusque. The raye affiliate the rich. The rich does not chase the yanaton. The rich is not chemic. The rich tauten the yanaton. If something tauten the raye then the raye is resilient. If the yanaton is chylous then the yanaton hook the raye. If something hook the raye then it is held. The yanaton is not held.", "logic": "\nChylous(yanaton)\nHook(tome, raye)\nChemic(tome)\nnot Chylous(tome)\nAffiliate(tome, yanaton)\nAffiliate(tome, raye)\nHook(raye, tome)\nHook(raye, rich)\nnot Resilient(raye)\nHeld(raye)\nChylous(raye)\nBrusque(raye)\nAffiliate(raye, rich)\nnot Hook(rich, yanaton)\nnot Chemic(rich)\nTauten(rich, yanaton)\nforall x (Tauten(x, raye) -> Resilient(raye))\nChylous(yanaton) -> Hook(yanaton, raye)\nforall x (Hook(x, raye) -> Held(x))\n\nnot Held(yanaton)\n\nChylous(yanaton) and Chylous(yanaton) -> Hook(yanaton, raye) -> therefore Hook(yanaton, raye) Hook(yanaton, raye) and forall x (Hook(x, raye) -> Held(x)) -> therefore Held(yanaton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The jeremiah is rattled. The cyril desex the selinda. The cyril is employable. The cyril is not rattled. The cyril realise the jeremiah. The cyril realise the selinda. The selinda desex the cyril. The selinda desex the martica. The selinda is not acoustic. The selinda is terminal. The selinda is rattled. The selinda is lucky. The selinda realise the martica. The martica does not chase the jeremiah. The martica is not employable. The martica rasp the jeremiah. If something rasp the selinda then the selinda is acoustic. If the jeremiah is rattled then the jeremiah desex the selinda. If something desex the selinda then it is terminal. The martica is not terminal.", "logic": "\nRattled(jeremiah)\nDesex(cyril, selinda)\nEmployable(cyril)\nnot Rattled(cyril)\nRealise(cyril, jeremiah)\nRealise(cyril, selinda)\nDesex(selinda, cyril)\nDesex(selinda, martica)\nnot Acoustic(selinda)\nTerminal(selinda)\nRattled(selinda)\nLucky(selinda)\nRealise(selinda, martica)\nnot Desex(martica, jeremiah)\nnot Employable(martica)\nRasp(martica, jeremiah)\nforall x (Rasp(x, selinda) -> Acoustic(selinda))\nRattled(jeremiah) -> Desex(jeremiah, selinda)\nforall x (Desex(x, selinda) -> Terminal(x))\n\nnot Terminal(martica)\n\nforall x (Desex(x, selinda) -> Terminal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The petra is subaquatic. The fayth parlay the margeaux. The fayth is spangled. The fayth is not subaquatic. The fayth shuffle the petra. The fayth shuffle the margeaux. The margeaux parlay the fayth. The margeaux parlay the juli. The margeaux is not capitalist. The margeaux is unblessed. The margeaux is subaquatic. The margeaux is geophytic. The margeaux shuffle the juli. The juli does not chase the petra. The juli is not spangled. The juli dispread the petra. If something dispread the margeaux then the margeaux is capitalist. If the petra is subaquatic then the petra parlay the margeaux. If something parlay the margeaux then it is unblessed. The margeaux parlay the petra.", "logic": "\nSubaquatic(petra)\nParlay(fayth, margeaux)\nSpangled(fayth)\nnot Subaquatic(fayth)\nShuffle(fayth, petra)\nShuffle(fayth, margeaux)\nParlay(margeaux, fayth)\nParlay(margeaux, juli)\nnot Capitalist(margeaux)\nUnblessed(margeaux)\nSubaquatic(margeaux)\nGeophytic(margeaux)\nShuffle(margeaux, juli)\nnot Parlay(juli, petra)\nnot Spangled(juli)\nDispread(juli, petra)\nforall x (Dispread(x, margeaux) -> Capitalist(margeaux))\nSubaquatic(petra) -> Parlay(petra, margeaux)\nforall x (Parlay(x, margeaux) -> Unblessed(x))\n\nParlay(margeaux, petra)\n\nParlay(margeaux, petra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The ethel is diminished. The elianore strum the leiah. The elianore is trifid. The elianore is not diminished. The elianore bunch the ethel. The elianore bunch the leiah. The leiah strum the elianore. The leiah strum the higgins. The leiah is not anabiotic. The leiah is hassidic. The leiah is diminished. The leiah is adrenergic. The leiah bunch the higgins. The higgins does not chase the ethel. The higgins is not trifid. The higgins moisten the ethel. If something moisten the leiah then the leiah is anabiotic. If the ethel is diminished then the ethel strum the leiah. If something strum the leiah then it is hassidic. The elianore is not adrenergic.", "logic": "\nDiminished(ethel)\nStrum(elianore, leiah)\nTrifid(elianore)\nnot Diminished(elianore)\nBunch(elianore, ethel)\nBunch(elianore, leiah)\nStrum(leiah, elianore)\nStrum(leiah, higgins)\nnot Anabiotic(leiah)\nHassidic(leiah)\nDiminished(leiah)\nAdrenergic(leiah)\nBunch(leiah, higgins)\nnot Strum(higgins, ethel)\nnot Trifid(higgins)\nMoisten(higgins, ethel)\nforall x (Moisten(x, leiah) -> Anabiotic(leiah))\nDiminished(ethel) -> Strum(ethel, leiah)\nforall x (Strum(x, leiah) -> Hassidic(x))\n\nnot Adrenergic(elianore)\n\nnot Adrenergic(elianore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The sid is donatist. The nick granulate the austen. The nick is knockdown. The nick is not donatist. The nick granulate the sid. The nick granulate the austen. The austen granulate the nick. The austen granulate the philippe. The austen is not priggish. The austen is egoistic. The austen is donatist. The austen is defoliated. The austen granulate the philippe. The philippe does not chase the sid. The philippe is not knockdown. The philippe plait the sid. If something plait the austen then the austen is priggish. If the sid is donatist then the sid granulate the austen. If something granulate the austen then it is egoistic. The sid granulate the nick.", "logic": "\nDonatist(sid)\nGranulate(nick, austen)\nKnockdown(nick)\nnot Donatist(nick)\nGranulate(nick, sid)\nGranulate(nick, austen)\nGranulate(austen, nick)\nGranulate(austen, philippe)\nnot Priggish(austen)\nEgoistic(austen)\nDonatist(austen)\nDefoliated(austen)\nGranulate(austen, philippe)\nnot Granulate(philippe, sid)\nnot Knockdown(philippe)\nPlait(philippe, sid)\nforall x (Plait(x, austen) -> Priggish(austen))\nDonatist(sid) -> Granulate(sid, austen)\nforall x (Granulate(x, austen) -> Egoistic(x))\n\nGranulate(sid, nick)\n\nGranulate(sid, nick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The tana is endodontic. The larry provoke the gussi. The larry is maximising. The larry is not endodontic. The larry croquet the tana. The larry croquet the gussi. The gussi provoke the larry. The gussi provoke the robin. The gussi is not tumescent. The gussi is lethargic. The gussi is endodontic. The gussi is ninetieth. The gussi croquet the robin. The robin does not chase the tana. The robin is not maximising. The robin gratify the tana. If something gratify the gussi then the gussi is tumescent. If the tana is endodontic then the tana provoke the gussi. If something provoke the gussi then it is lethargic. The tana does not chase the larry.", "logic": "\nEndodontic(tana)\nProvoke(larry, gussi)\nMaximising(larry)\nnot Endodontic(larry)\nCroquet(larry, tana)\nCroquet(larry, gussi)\nProvoke(gussi, larry)\nProvoke(gussi, robin)\nnot Tumescent(gussi)\nLethargic(gussi)\nEndodontic(gussi)\nNinetieth(gussi)\nCroquet(gussi, robin)\nnot Provoke(robin, tana)\nnot Maximising(robin)\nGratify(robin, tana)\nforall x (Gratify(x, gussi) -> Tumescent(gussi))\nEndodontic(tana) -> Provoke(tana, gussi)\nforall x (Provoke(x, gussi) -> Lethargic(x))\n\nnot Provoke(tana, larry)\n\nnot Provoke(tana, larry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "The daveta is creedal. The jorie define the chauncey. The jorie is parhelic. The jorie is not creedal. The jorie recompense the daveta. The jorie recompense the chauncey. The chauncey define the jorie. The chauncey define the georges. The chauncey is not steroidal. The chauncey is smothering. The chauncey is creedal. The chauncey is sacculated. The chauncey recompense the georges. The georges does not chase the daveta. The georges is not parhelic. The georges dropforge the daveta. If something dropforge the chauncey then the chauncey is steroidal. If the daveta is creedal then the daveta define the chauncey. If something define the chauncey then it is smothering. The georges recompense the jorie.", "logic": "\nCreedal(daveta)\nDefine(jorie, chauncey)\nParhelic(jorie)\nnot Creedal(jorie)\nRecompense(jorie, daveta)\nRecompense(jorie, chauncey)\nDefine(chauncey, jorie)\nDefine(chauncey, georges)\nnot Steroidal(chauncey)\nSmothering(chauncey)\nCreedal(chauncey)\nSacculated(chauncey)\nRecompense(chauncey, georges)\nnot Define(georges, daveta)\nnot Parhelic(georges)\nDropforge(georges, daveta)\nforall x (Dropforge(x, chauncey) -> Steroidal(chauncey))\nCreedal(daveta) -> Define(daveta, chauncey)\nforall x (Define(x, chauncey) -> Smothering(x))\n\nRecompense(georges, jorie)\n\nRecompense(georges, jorie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2043"} {"premises": "Aylmer is haywire. Aylmer is epiphysial. Aylmer is somatic. Aylmer is operose. Daune is creedal. Charleen is haywire. Charleen is epiphysial. Charleen is somatic. Hilda is creedal. Hilda is advanced. If Aylmer is homophobic and Aylmer is somatic then Aylmer is creedal. All somatic things are haywire. White, haywire things are somatic. All somatic things are homophobic. If something is advanced then it is epiphysial. If something is somatic then it is haywire. If something is creedal and advanced then it is somatic. If Hilda is somatic and Hilda is epiphysial then Hilda is creedal. Aylmer is operose.", "logic": "\nHaywire(aylmer)\nEpiphysial(aylmer)\nSomatic(aylmer)\nOperose(aylmer)\nCreedal(daune)\nHaywire(charleen)\nEpiphysial(charleen)\nSomatic(charleen)\nCreedal(hilda)\nAdvanced(hilda)\nHomophobic(aylmer) and Somatic(aylmer) -> Creedal(aylmer)\nforall x (Somatic(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) and Haywire(x) -> Somatic(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) -> Homophobic(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Epiphysial(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Creedal(x) and Advanced(x) -> Somatic(x))\nSomatic(hilda) and Epiphysial(hilda) -> Creedal(hilda)\n\nOperose(aylmer)\n\ntherefore Operose(aylmer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Robinson is starkers. Robinson is meddlesome. Robinson is togged. Robinson is ambivalent. Lark is spacial. Amaleta is starkers. Amaleta is meddlesome. Amaleta is togged. Aura is spacial. Aura is grovelling. If Robinson is carpeted and Robinson is togged then Robinson is spacial. All togged things are starkers. White, starkers things are togged. All togged things are carpeted. If something is grovelling then it is meddlesome. If something is togged then it is starkers. If something is spacial and grovelling then it is togged. If Aura is togged and Aura is meddlesome then Aura is spacial. Amaleta is not starkers.", "logic": "\nStarkers(robinson)\nMeddlesome(robinson)\nTogged(robinson)\nAmbivalent(robinson)\nSpacial(lark)\nStarkers(amaleta)\nMeddlesome(amaleta)\nTogged(amaleta)\nSpacial(aura)\nGrovelling(aura)\nCarpeted(robinson) and Togged(robinson) -> Spacial(robinson)\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Starkers(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) and Starkers(x) -> Togged(x))\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Grovelling(x) -> Meddlesome(x))\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Starkers(x))\nforall x (Spacial(x) and Grovelling(x) -> Togged(x))\nTogged(aura) and Meddlesome(aura) -> Spacial(aura)\n\nnot Starkers(amaleta)\n\ntherefore Starkers(amaleta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Odilia is grungy. Odilia is manual. Odilia is mongoloid. Odilia is rampageous. Elinor is luxe. Ioana is grungy. Ioana is manual. Ioana is mongoloid. Thom is luxe. Thom is permeative. If Odilia is funguslike and Odilia is mongoloid then Odilia is luxe. All mongoloid things are grungy. White, grungy things are mongoloid. All mongoloid things are funguslike. If something is permeative then it is manual. If something is mongoloid then it is grungy. If something is luxe and permeative then it is mongoloid. If Thom is mongoloid and Thom is manual then Thom is luxe. Ioana is funguslike.", "logic": "\nGrungy(odilia)\nManual(odilia)\nMongoloid(odilia)\nRampageous(odilia)\nLuxe(elinor)\nGrungy(ioana)\nManual(ioana)\nMongoloid(ioana)\nLuxe(thom)\nPermeative(thom)\nFunguslike(odilia) and Mongoloid(odilia) -> Luxe(odilia)\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Grungy(x))\nforall x (Rampageous(x) and Grungy(x) -> Mongoloid(x))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Funguslike(x))\nforall x (Permeative(x) -> Manual(x))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Grungy(x))\nforall x (Luxe(x) and Permeative(x) -> Mongoloid(x))\nMongoloid(thom) and Manual(thom) -> Luxe(thom)\n\nFunguslike(ioana)\n\nMongoloid(ioana) and forall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Funguslike(x)) -> therefore Funguslike(ioana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Aliza is sequential. Aliza is defeasible. Aliza is booming. Aliza is ritardando. Sheffield is epizootic. Nissie is sequential. Nissie is defeasible. Nissie is booming. Corabella is epizootic. Corabella is jewelled. If Aliza is cackly and Aliza is booming then Aliza is epizootic. All booming things are sequential. White, sequential things are booming. All booming things are cackly. If something is jewelled then it is defeasible. If something is booming then it is sequential. If something is epizootic and jewelled then it is booming. If Corabella is booming and Corabella is defeasible then Corabella is epizootic. Corabella is not booming.", "logic": "\nSequential(aliza)\nDefeasible(aliza)\nBooming(aliza)\nRitardando(aliza)\nEpizootic(sheffield)\nSequential(nissie)\nDefeasible(nissie)\nBooming(nissie)\nEpizootic(corabella)\nJewelled(corabella)\nCackly(aliza) and Booming(aliza) -> Epizootic(aliza)\nforall x (Booming(x) -> Sequential(x))\nforall x (Ritardando(x) and Sequential(x) -> Booming(x))\nforall x (Booming(x) -> Cackly(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Booming(x) -> Sequential(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Booming(x))\nBooming(corabella) and Defeasible(corabella) -> Epizootic(corabella)\n\nnot Booming(corabella)\n\nEpizootic(corabella) and Jewelled(corabella) and forall x (Epizootic(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Booming(x)) -> therefore Booming(corabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Ethel is respective. Ethel is baggy. Ethel is clubbish. Ethel is apteral. Penrod is deist. Matelda is respective. Matelda is baggy. Matelda is clubbish. Ailina is deist. Ailina is incarnate. If Ethel is flyaway and Ethel is clubbish then Ethel is deist. All clubbish things are respective. White, respective things are clubbish. All clubbish things are flyaway. If something is incarnate then it is baggy. If something is clubbish then it is respective. If something is deist and incarnate then it is clubbish. If Ailina is clubbish and Ailina is baggy then Ailina is deist. Ailina is flyaway.", "logic": "\nRespective(ethel)\nBaggy(ethel)\nClubbish(ethel)\nApteral(ethel)\nDeist(penrod)\nRespective(matelda)\nBaggy(matelda)\nClubbish(matelda)\nDeist(ailina)\nIncarnate(ailina)\nFlyaway(ethel) and Clubbish(ethel) -> Deist(ethel)\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) and Respective(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Flyaway(x))\nforall x (Incarnate(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Deist(x) and Incarnate(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nClubbish(ailina) and Baggy(ailina) -> Deist(ailina)\n\nFlyaway(ailina)\n\nDeist(ailina) and Incarnate(ailina) and forall x (Deist(x) and Incarnate(x) -> Clubbish(x)) -> therefore Clubbish(ailina) Clubbish(ailina) and forall x (Clubbish(x) -> Flyaway(x)) -> therefore Flyaway(ailina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Minnie is disgustful. Minnie is agnatic. Minnie is kindly. Minnie is pendulous. Gisella is counter. Flint is disgustful. Flint is agnatic. Flint is kindly. Malinde is counter. Malinde is adequate. If Minnie is brooding and Minnie is kindly then Minnie is counter. All kindly things are disgustful. White, disgustful things are kindly. All kindly things are brooding. If something is adequate then it is agnatic. If something is kindly then it is disgustful. If something is counter and adequate then it is kindly. If Malinde is kindly and Malinde is agnatic then Malinde is counter. Malinde is not disgustful.", "logic": "\nDisgustful(minnie)\nAgnatic(minnie)\nKindly(minnie)\nPendulous(minnie)\nCounter(gisella)\nDisgustful(flint)\nAgnatic(flint)\nKindly(flint)\nCounter(malinde)\nAdequate(malinde)\nBrooding(minnie) and Kindly(minnie) -> Counter(minnie)\nforall x (Kindly(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Pendulous(x) and Disgustful(x) -> Kindly(x))\nforall x (Kindly(x) -> Brooding(x))\nforall x (Adequate(x) -> Agnatic(x))\nforall x (Kindly(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Counter(x) and Adequate(x) -> Kindly(x))\nKindly(malinde) and Agnatic(malinde) -> Counter(malinde)\n\nnot Disgustful(malinde)\n\nCounter(malinde) and Adequate(malinde) and forall x (Counter(x) and Adequate(x) -> Kindly(x)) -> therefore Kindly(malinde) Kindly(malinde) and forall x (Kindly(x) -> Disgustful(x)) -> therefore Disgustful(malinde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Hynda is apoplectic. Hynda is constant. Hynda is churchly. Hynda is shaken. Desaree is enjoyable. Moshe is apoplectic. Moshe is constant. Moshe is churchly. Alexis is enjoyable. Alexis is somber. If Hynda is solicitous and Hynda is churchly then Hynda is enjoyable. All churchly things are apoplectic. White, apoplectic things are churchly. All churchly things are solicitous. If something is somber then it is constant. If something is churchly then it is apoplectic. If something is enjoyable and somber then it is churchly. If Alexis is churchly and Alexis is constant then Alexis is enjoyable. Desaree is not solicitous.", "logic": "\nApoplectic(hynda)\nConstant(hynda)\nChurchly(hynda)\nShaken(hynda)\nEnjoyable(desaree)\nApoplectic(moshe)\nConstant(moshe)\nChurchly(moshe)\nEnjoyable(alexis)\nSomber(alexis)\nSolicitous(hynda) and Churchly(hynda) -> Enjoyable(hynda)\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Apoplectic(x))\nforall x (Shaken(x) and Apoplectic(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Solicitous(x))\nforall x (Somber(x) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Apoplectic(x))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) and Somber(x) -> Churchly(x))\nChurchly(alexis) and Constant(alexis) -> Enjoyable(alexis)\n\nnot Solicitous(desaree)\n\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Solicitous(x)) <- forall x (Shaken(x) and Apoplectic(x) -> Churchly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Trever is lxxxii. Trever is anorthitic. Trever is bacillar. Trever is peachy. Lenny is blinded. Ann is lxxxii. Ann is anorthitic. Ann is bacillar. Susan is blinded. Susan is happy. If Trever is honeylike and Trever is bacillar then Trever is blinded. All bacillar things are lxxxii. White, lxxxii things are bacillar. All bacillar things are honeylike. If something is happy then it is anorthitic. If something is bacillar then it is lxxxii. If something is blinded and happy then it is bacillar. If Susan is bacillar and Susan is anorthitic then Susan is blinded. Lenny is lxxxii.", "logic": "\nLxxxii(trever)\nAnorthitic(trever)\nBacillar(trever)\nPeachy(trever)\nBlinded(lenny)\nLxxxii(ann)\nAnorthitic(ann)\nBacillar(ann)\nBlinded(susan)\nHappy(susan)\nHoneylike(trever) and Bacillar(trever) -> Blinded(trever)\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Peachy(x) and Lxxxii(x) -> Bacillar(x))\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Blinded(x) and Happy(x) -> Bacillar(x))\nBacillar(susan) and Anorthitic(susan) -> Blinded(susan)\n\nLxxxii(lenny)\n\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Lxxxii(x)) <- forall x (Peachy(x) and Lxxxii(x) -> Bacillar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Umberto is vehicular. Umberto is celtic. Umberto is determined. Umberto is bumptious. Cobby is crappy. Carter is vehicular. Carter is celtic. Carter is determined. Shanon is crappy. Shanon is oversize. If Umberto is preemptive and Umberto is determined then Umberto is crappy. All determined things are vehicular. White, vehicular things are determined. All determined things are preemptive. If something is oversize then it is celtic. If something is determined then it is vehicular. If something is crappy and oversize then it is determined. If Shanon is determined and Shanon is celtic then Shanon is crappy. Cobby is not determined.", "logic": "\nVehicular(umberto)\nCeltic(umberto)\nDetermined(umberto)\nBumptious(umberto)\nCrappy(cobby)\nVehicular(carter)\nCeltic(carter)\nDetermined(carter)\nCrappy(shanon)\nOversize(shanon)\nPreemptive(umberto) and Determined(umberto) -> Crappy(umberto)\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and Vehicular(x) -> Determined(x))\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) -> Celtic(x))\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Crappy(x) and Oversize(x) -> Determined(x))\nDetermined(shanon) and Celtic(shanon) -> Crappy(shanon)\n\nnot Determined(cobby)\n\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and Vehicular(x) -> Determined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Coralie is bacteremic. Coralie is unsmooth. Coralie is flawed. Coralie is perfidious. Chiarra is nebulous. Leiah is bacteremic. Leiah is unsmooth. Leiah is flawed. Dorette is nebulous. Dorette is pulverised. If Coralie is homoecious and Coralie is flawed then Coralie is nebulous. All flawed things are bacteremic. White, bacteremic things are flawed. All flawed things are homoecious. If something is pulverised then it is unsmooth. If something is flawed then it is bacteremic. If something is nebulous and pulverised then it is flawed. If Dorette is flawed and Dorette is unsmooth then Dorette is nebulous. Leiah is pulverised.", "logic": "\nBacteremic(coralie)\nUnsmooth(coralie)\nFlawed(coralie)\nPerfidious(coralie)\nNebulous(chiarra)\nBacteremic(leiah)\nUnsmooth(leiah)\nFlawed(leiah)\nNebulous(dorette)\nPulverised(dorette)\nHomoecious(coralie) and Flawed(coralie) -> Nebulous(coralie)\nforall x (Flawed(x) -> Bacteremic(x))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) and Bacteremic(x) -> Flawed(x))\nforall x (Flawed(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) -> Unsmooth(x))\nforall x (Flawed(x) -> Bacteremic(x))\nforall x (Nebulous(x) and Pulverised(x) -> Flawed(x))\nFlawed(dorette) and Unsmooth(dorette) -> Nebulous(dorette)\n\nPulverised(leiah)\n\nPulverised(leiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Stefano is titanic. Stefano is ovine. Stefano is catamenial. Stefano is tortuous. Ignazio is precocious. Adlai is titanic. Adlai is ovine. Adlai is catamenial. Nora is precocious. Nora is biconcave. If Stefano is barbed and Stefano is catamenial then Stefano is precocious. All catamenial things are titanic. White, titanic things are catamenial. All catamenial things are barbed. If something is biconcave then it is ovine. If something is catamenial then it is titanic. If something is precocious and biconcave then it is catamenial. If Nora is catamenial and Nora is ovine then Nora is precocious. Adlai is not precocious.", "logic": "\nTitanic(stefano)\nOvine(stefano)\nCatamenial(stefano)\nTortuous(stefano)\nPrecocious(ignazio)\nTitanic(adlai)\nOvine(adlai)\nCatamenial(adlai)\nPrecocious(nora)\nBiconcave(nora)\nBarbed(stefano) and Catamenial(stefano) -> Precocious(stefano)\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Titanic(x))\nforall x (Tortuous(x) and Titanic(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Barbed(x))\nforall x (Biconcave(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Titanic(x))\nforall x (Precocious(x) and Biconcave(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nCatamenial(nora) and Ovine(nora) -> Precocious(nora)\n\nnot Precocious(adlai)\n\nnot Precocious(adlai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "Laverne is swingeing. Laverne is unadvised. Laverne is aluminous. Laverne is peaty. Alison is outsized. Riki is swingeing. Riki is unadvised. Riki is aluminous. Shaina is outsized. Shaina is heathenish. If Laverne is deictic and Laverne is aluminous then Laverne is outsized. All aluminous things are swingeing. White, swingeing things are aluminous. All aluminous things are deictic. If something is heathenish then it is unadvised. If something is aluminous then it is swingeing. If something is outsized and heathenish then it is aluminous. If Shaina is aluminous and Shaina is unadvised then Shaina is outsized. Alison is peaty.", "logic": "\nSwingeing(laverne)\nUnadvised(laverne)\nAluminous(laverne)\nPeaty(laverne)\nOutsized(alison)\nSwingeing(riki)\nUnadvised(riki)\nAluminous(riki)\nOutsized(shaina)\nHeathenish(shaina)\nDeictic(laverne) and Aluminous(laverne) -> Outsized(laverne)\nforall x (Aluminous(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) and Swingeing(x) -> Aluminous(x))\nforall x (Aluminous(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Heathenish(x) -> Unadvised(x))\nforall x (Aluminous(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (Outsized(x) and Heathenish(x) -> Aluminous(x))\nAluminous(shaina) and Unadvised(shaina) -> Outsized(shaina)\n\nPeaty(alison)\n\nPeaty(alison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2004"} {"premises": "The pate is magic. The pate is blear. The pate is epiphysial. The pate chuckle the waiter. The pate refund the waiter. The pate refund the deryl. The waiter monitor the deryl. The deryl monitor the pate. The deryl refund the pate. The deryl refund the waiter. If the waiter refund the deryl then the waiter is magic. If something refund the waiter then the waiter refund the deryl. The pate is blear.", "logic": "\nMagic(pate)\nBlear(pate)\nEpiphysial(pate)\nChuckle(pate, waiter)\nRefund(pate, waiter)\nRefund(pate, deryl)\nMonitor(waiter, deryl)\nMonitor(deryl, pate)\nRefund(deryl, pate)\nRefund(deryl, waiter)\nRefund(waiter, deryl) -> Magic(waiter)\nforall x (Refund(x, waiter) -> Refund(waiter, deryl))\n\nBlear(pate)\n\ntherefore Blear(pate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The cristina is feverous. The cristina is bipolar. The cristina is unwonted. The cristina canter the mayer. The cristina pronounce the mayer. The cristina pronounce the terencio. The mayer court the terencio. The terencio court the cristina. The terencio pronounce the cristina. The terencio pronounce the mayer. If the mayer pronounce the terencio then the mayer is feverous. If something pronounce the mayer then the mayer pronounce the terencio. The cristina does not visit the terencio.", "logic": "\nFeverous(cristina)\nBipolar(cristina)\nUnwonted(cristina)\nCanter(cristina, mayer)\nPronounce(cristina, mayer)\nPronounce(cristina, terencio)\nCourt(mayer, terencio)\nCourt(terencio, cristina)\nPronounce(terencio, cristina)\nPronounce(terencio, mayer)\nPronounce(mayer, terencio) -> Feverous(mayer)\nforall x (Pronounce(x, mayer) -> Pronounce(mayer, terencio))\n\nnot Pronounce(cristina, terencio)\n\ntherefore Pronounce(cristina, terencio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The marcela is fancied. The marcela is irruptive. The marcela is dissipated. The marcela prop the shepard. The marcela bellylaugh the shepard. The marcela bellylaugh the owen. The shepard invite the owen. The owen invite the marcela. The owen bellylaugh the marcela. The owen bellylaugh the shepard. If the shepard bellylaugh the owen then the shepard is fancied. If something bellylaugh the shepard then the shepard bellylaugh the owen. The shepard bellylaugh the owen.", "logic": "\nFancied(marcela)\nIrruptive(marcela)\nDissipated(marcela)\nProp(marcela, shepard)\nBellylaugh(marcela, shepard)\nBellylaugh(marcela, owen)\nInvite(shepard, owen)\nInvite(owen, marcela)\nBellylaugh(owen, marcela)\nBellylaugh(owen, shepard)\nBellylaugh(shepard, owen) -> Fancied(shepard)\nforall x (Bellylaugh(x, shepard) -> Bellylaugh(shepard, owen))\n\nBellylaugh(shepard, owen)\n\nBellylaugh(owen, shepard) and forall x (Bellylaugh(x, shepard) -> Bellylaugh(shepard, owen)) -> therefore Bellylaugh(shepard, owen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The rodney is slovenly. The rodney is cambrian. The rodney is ascensive. The rodney curdle the fleur. The rodney crane the fleur. The rodney crane the waleed. The fleur intoxicate the waleed. The waleed intoxicate the rodney. The waleed crane the rodney. The waleed crane the fleur. If the fleur crane the waleed then the fleur is slovenly. If something crane the fleur then the fleur crane the waleed. The fleur does not visit the waleed.", "logic": "\nSlovenly(rodney)\nCambrian(rodney)\nAscensive(rodney)\nCurdle(rodney, fleur)\nCrane(rodney, fleur)\nCrane(rodney, waleed)\nIntoxicate(fleur, waleed)\nIntoxicate(waleed, rodney)\nCrane(waleed, rodney)\nCrane(waleed, fleur)\nCrane(fleur, waleed) -> Slovenly(fleur)\nforall x (Crane(x, fleur) -> Crane(fleur, waleed))\n\nnot Crane(fleur, waleed)\n\nCrane(waleed, fleur) and forall x (Crane(x, fleur) -> Crane(fleur, waleed)) -> therefore Crane(fleur, waleed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The adnan is dismaying. The adnan is unwatchful. The adnan is tumultuous. The adnan amass the ketti. The adnan hijack the ketti. The adnan hijack the linnell. The ketti mature the linnell. The linnell mature the adnan. The linnell hijack the adnan. The linnell hijack the ketti. If the ketti hijack the linnell then the ketti is dismaying. If something hijack the ketti then the ketti hijack the linnell. The ketti is dismaying.", "logic": "\nDismaying(adnan)\nUnwatchful(adnan)\nTumultuous(adnan)\nAmass(adnan, ketti)\nHijack(adnan, ketti)\nHijack(adnan, linnell)\nMature(ketti, linnell)\nMature(linnell, adnan)\nHijack(linnell, adnan)\nHijack(linnell, ketti)\nHijack(ketti, linnell) -> Dismaying(ketti)\nforall x (Hijack(x, ketti) -> Hijack(ketti, linnell))\n\nDismaying(ketti)\n\nHijack(linnell, ketti) and forall x (Hijack(x, ketti) -> Hijack(ketti, linnell)) -> therefore Hijack(ketti, linnell) Hijack(ketti, linnell) and Hijack(ketti, linnell) -> Dismaying(ketti) -> therefore Dismaying(ketti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The leesa is xlvii. The leesa is foiled. The leesa is afeared. The leesa triple the ludwig. The leesa inunct the ludwig. The leesa inunct the cathryn. The ludwig underquote the cathryn. The cathryn underquote the leesa. The cathryn inunct the leesa. The cathryn inunct the ludwig. If the ludwig inunct the cathryn then the ludwig is xlvii. If something inunct the ludwig then the ludwig inunct the cathryn. The ludwig is not xlvii.", "logic": "\nXlvii(leesa)\nFoiled(leesa)\nAfeared(leesa)\nTriple(leesa, ludwig)\nInunct(leesa, ludwig)\nInunct(leesa, cathryn)\nUnderquote(ludwig, cathryn)\nUnderquote(cathryn, leesa)\nInunct(cathryn, leesa)\nInunct(cathryn, ludwig)\nInunct(ludwig, cathryn) -> Xlvii(ludwig)\nforall x (Inunct(x, ludwig) -> Inunct(ludwig, cathryn))\n\nnot Xlvii(ludwig)\n\nInunct(cathryn, ludwig) and forall x (Inunct(x, ludwig) -> Inunct(ludwig, cathryn)) -> therefore Inunct(ludwig, cathryn) Inunct(ludwig, cathryn) and Inunct(ludwig, cathryn) -> Xlvii(ludwig) -> therefore Xlvii(ludwig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The manish is political. The manish is dependent. The manish is lush. The manish surmount the rodger. The manish grace the rodger. The manish grace the esma. The rodger offset the esma. The esma offset the manish. The esma grace the manish. The esma grace the rodger. If the rodger grace the esma then the rodger is political. If something grace the rodger then the rodger grace the esma. The esma does not see the rodger.", "logic": "\nPolitical(manish)\nDependent(manish)\nLush(manish)\nSurmount(manish, rodger)\nGrace(manish, rodger)\nGrace(manish, esma)\nOffset(rodger, esma)\nOffset(esma, manish)\nGrace(esma, manish)\nGrace(esma, rodger)\nGrace(rodger, esma) -> Political(rodger)\nforall x (Grace(x, rodger) -> Grace(rodger, esma))\n\nnot Offset(esma, rodger)\n\nnot Offset(esma, rodger) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The herschel is unbuttoned. The herschel is ionic. The herschel is auspicious. The herschel hole the rudyard. The herschel rollick the rudyard. The herschel rollick the sandro. The rudyard govern the sandro. The sandro govern the herschel. The sandro rollick the herschel. The sandro rollick the rudyard. If the rudyard rollick the sandro then the rudyard is unbuttoned. If something rollick the rudyard then the rudyard rollick the sandro. The rudyard rollick the rudyard.", "logic": "\nUnbuttoned(herschel)\nIonic(herschel)\nAuspicious(herschel)\nHole(herschel, rudyard)\nRollick(herschel, rudyard)\nRollick(herschel, sandro)\nGovern(rudyard, sandro)\nGovern(sandro, herschel)\nRollick(sandro, herschel)\nRollick(sandro, rudyard)\nRollick(rudyard, sandro) -> Unbuttoned(rudyard)\nforall x (Rollick(x, rudyard) -> Rollick(rudyard, sandro))\n\nRollick(rudyard, rudyard)\n\nRollick(rudyard, rudyard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The delila is consultive. The delila is cramped. The delila is express. The delila airmail the wilmette. The delila overspend the wilmette. The delila overspend the gena. The wilmette prophesy the gena. The gena prophesy the delila. The gena overspend the delila. The gena overspend the wilmette. If the wilmette overspend the gena then the wilmette is consultive. If something overspend the wilmette then the wilmette overspend the gena. The gena does not need the delila.", "logic": "\nConsultive(delila)\nCramped(delila)\nExpress(delila)\nAirmail(delila, wilmette)\nOverspend(delila, wilmette)\nOverspend(delila, gena)\nProphesy(wilmette, gena)\nProphesy(gena, delila)\nOverspend(gena, delila)\nOverspend(gena, wilmette)\nOverspend(wilmette, gena) -> Consultive(wilmette)\nforall x (Overspend(x, wilmette) -> Overspend(wilmette, gena))\n\nnot Airmail(gena, delila)\n\nnot Airmail(gena, delila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The clarisse is elected. The clarisse is unmanly. The clarisse is reusable. The clarisse seduce the jami. The clarisse effloresce the jami. The clarisse effloresce the shalne. The jami cast the shalne. The shalne cast the clarisse. The shalne effloresce the clarisse. The shalne effloresce the jami. If the jami effloresce the shalne then the jami is elected. If something effloresce the jami then the jami effloresce the shalne. The jami seduce the jami.", "logic": "\nElected(clarisse)\nUnmanly(clarisse)\nReusable(clarisse)\nSeduce(clarisse, jami)\nEffloresce(clarisse, jami)\nEffloresce(clarisse, shalne)\nCast(jami, shalne)\nCast(shalne, clarisse)\nEffloresce(shalne, clarisse)\nEffloresce(shalne, jami)\nEffloresce(jami, shalne) -> Elected(jami)\nforall x (Effloresce(x, jami) -> Effloresce(jami, shalne))\n\nSeduce(jami, jami)\n\nSeduce(jami, jami) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The lavena is profuse. The lavena is lvii. The lavena is seedless. The lavena hobnail the nicol. The lavena sportscast the nicol. The lavena sportscast the grier. The nicol outclass the grier. The grier outclass the lavena. The grier sportscast the lavena. The grier sportscast the nicol. If the nicol sportscast the grier then the nicol is profuse. If something sportscast the nicol then the nicol sportscast the grier. The lavena does not see the grier.", "logic": "\nProfuse(lavena)\nLvii(lavena)\nSeedless(lavena)\nHobnail(lavena, nicol)\nSportscast(lavena, nicol)\nSportscast(lavena, grier)\nOutclass(nicol, grier)\nOutclass(grier, lavena)\nSportscast(grier, lavena)\nSportscast(grier, nicol)\nSportscast(nicol, grier) -> Profuse(nicol)\nforall x (Sportscast(x, nicol) -> Sportscast(nicol, grier))\n\nnot Outclass(lavena, grier)\n\nnot Outclass(lavena, grier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The clair is hidebound. The clair is soundproof. The clair is caudal. The clair prepay the laina. The clair cheer the laina. The clair cheer the klarika. The laina bias the klarika. The klarika bias the clair. The klarika cheer the clair. The klarika cheer the laina. If the laina cheer the klarika then the laina is hidebound. If something cheer the laina then the laina cheer the klarika. The laina is round.", "logic": "\nHidebound(clair)\nSoundproof(clair)\nCaudal(clair)\nPrepay(clair, laina)\nCheer(clair, laina)\nCheer(clair, klarika)\nBias(laina, klarika)\nBias(klarika, clair)\nCheer(klarika, clair)\nCheer(klarika, laina)\nCheer(laina, klarika) -> Hidebound(laina)\nforall x (Cheer(x, laina) -> Cheer(laina, klarika))\n\nRound(laina)\n\nRound(laina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-969"} {"premises": "The sollie does not chase the jef. The sollie parachute the crysta. The sollie does not like the jef. The sollie does not need the jef. The sollie rectify the crysta. The jef parachute the crysta. The jef is aureate. The jef slow the sollie. The jef slow the crysta. The jef rectify the sollie. The jef rectify the crysta. The crysta rectify the sollie. If something parachute the sollie and the sollie rectify the jef then it slow the crysta. If the sollie is not gambian then the sollie parachute the crysta. If something slow the crysta then it slow the jef. If something is aureate and it slow the jef then it is indelicate. If something rectify the sollie then it does not need the jef. If the crysta parachute the sollie then the sollie does not need the jef. The sollie does not chase the jef.", "logic": "\nnot Parachute(sollie, jef)\nParachute(sollie, crysta)\nnot Slow(sollie, jef)\nnot Rectify(sollie, jef)\nRectify(sollie, crysta)\nParachute(jef, crysta)\nAureate(jef)\nSlow(jef, sollie)\nSlow(jef, crysta)\nRectify(jef, sollie)\nRectify(jef, crysta)\nRectify(crysta, sollie)\nforall x (Parachute(x, sollie) and Rectify(sollie, jef) -> Slow(x, crysta))\nnot Gambian(sollie) -> Parachute(sollie, crysta)\nforall x (Slow(x, crysta) -> Slow(x, jef))\nforall x (Aureate(x) and Slow(x, jef) -> Indelicate(x))\nforall x (Rectify(x, sollie) -> not Rectify(x, jef))\nParachute(crysta, sollie) -> not Rectify(sollie, jef)\n\nnot Parachute(sollie, jef)\n\ntherefore not Parachute(sollie, jef)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The osborne does not chase the tymothy. The osborne mash the micky. The osborne does not like the tymothy. The osborne does not need the tymothy. The osborne dishonor the micky. The tymothy mash the micky. The tymothy is hadean. The tymothy assert the osborne. The tymothy assert the micky. The tymothy dishonor the osborne. The tymothy dishonor the micky. The micky dishonor the osborne. If something mash the osborne and the osborne dishonor the tymothy then it assert the micky. If the osborne is not gutless then the osborne mash the micky. If something assert the micky then it assert the tymothy. If something is hadean and it assert the tymothy then it is estonian. If something dishonor the osborne then it does not need the tymothy. If the micky mash the osborne then the osborne does not need the tymothy. The tymothy does not like the osborne.", "logic": "\nnot Mash(osborne, tymothy)\nMash(osborne, micky)\nnot Assert(osborne, tymothy)\nnot Dishonor(osborne, tymothy)\nDishonor(osborne, micky)\nMash(tymothy, micky)\nHadean(tymothy)\nAssert(tymothy, osborne)\nAssert(tymothy, micky)\nDishonor(tymothy, osborne)\nDishonor(tymothy, micky)\nDishonor(micky, osborne)\nforall x (Mash(x, osborne) and Dishonor(osborne, tymothy) -> Assert(x, micky))\nnot Gutless(osborne) -> Mash(osborne, micky)\nforall x (Assert(x, micky) -> Assert(x, tymothy))\nforall x (Hadean(x) and Assert(x, tymothy) -> Estonian(x))\nforall x (Dishonor(x, osborne) -> not Dishonor(x, tymothy))\nMash(micky, osborne) -> not Dishonor(osborne, tymothy)\n\nnot Assert(tymothy, osborne)\n\ntherefore Assert(tymothy, osborne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The guinna does not chase the carlee. The guinna efface the marthe. The guinna does not like the carlee. The guinna does not need the carlee. The guinna exhibit the marthe. The carlee efface the marthe. The carlee is assamese. The carlee formalize the guinna. The carlee formalize the marthe. The carlee exhibit the guinna. The carlee exhibit the marthe. The marthe exhibit the guinna. If something efface the guinna and the guinna exhibit the carlee then it formalize the marthe. If the guinna is not craggy then the guinna efface the marthe. If something formalize the marthe then it formalize the carlee. If something is assamese and it formalize the carlee then it is consultive. If something exhibit the guinna then it does not need the carlee. If the marthe efface the guinna then the guinna does not need the carlee. The carlee does not need the carlee.", "logic": "\nnot Efface(guinna, carlee)\nEfface(guinna, marthe)\nnot Formalize(guinna, carlee)\nnot Exhibit(guinna, carlee)\nExhibit(guinna, marthe)\nEfface(carlee, marthe)\nAssamese(carlee)\nFormalize(carlee, guinna)\nFormalize(carlee, marthe)\nExhibit(carlee, guinna)\nExhibit(carlee, marthe)\nExhibit(marthe, guinna)\nforall x (Efface(x, guinna) and Exhibit(guinna, carlee) -> Formalize(x, marthe))\nnot Craggy(guinna) -> Efface(guinna, marthe)\nforall x (Formalize(x, marthe) -> Formalize(x, carlee))\nforall x (Assamese(x) and Formalize(x, carlee) -> Consultive(x))\nforall x (Exhibit(x, guinna) -> not Exhibit(x, carlee))\nEfface(marthe, guinna) -> not Exhibit(guinna, carlee)\n\nnot Exhibit(carlee, carlee)\n\nExhibit(carlee, guinna) and forall x (Exhibit(x, guinna) -> not Exhibit(x, carlee)) -> therefore not Exhibit(carlee, carlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The deanne does not chase the annmarie. The deanne perorate the cora. The deanne does not like the annmarie. The deanne does not need the annmarie. The deanne demise the cora. The annmarie perorate the cora. The annmarie is satiable. The annmarie portray the deanne. The annmarie portray the cora. The annmarie demise the deanne. The annmarie demise the cora. The cora demise the deanne. If something perorate the deanne and the deanne demise the annmarie then it portray the cora. If the deanne is not biloculate then the deanne perorate the cora. If something portray the cora then it portray the annmarie. If something is satiable and it portray the annmarie then it is emmetropic. If something demise the deanne then it does not need the annmarie. If the cora perorate the deanne then the deanne does not need the annmarie. The cora demise the annmarie.", "logic": "\nnot Perorate(deanne, annmarie)\nPerorate(deanne, cora)\nnot Portray(deanne, annmarie)\nnot Demise(deanne, annmarie)\nDemise(deanne, cora)\nPerorate(annmarie, cora)\nSatiable(annmarie)\nPortray(annmarie, deanne)\nPortray(annmarie, cora)\nDemise(annmarie, deanne)\nDemise(annmarie, cora)\nDemise(cora, deanne)\nforall x (Perorate(x, deanne) and Demise(deanne, annmarie) -> Portray(x, cora))\nnot Biloculate(deanne) -> Perorate(deanne, cora)\nforall x (Portray(x, cora) -> Portray(x, annmarie))\nforall x (Satiable(x) and Portray(x, annmarie) -> Emmetropic(x))\nforall x (Demise(x, deanne) -> not Demise(x, annmarie))\nPerorate(cora, deanne) -> not Demise(deanne, annmarie)\n\nDemise(cora, annmarie)\n\nDemise(cora, deanne) and forall x (Demise(x, deanne) -> not Demise(x, annmarie)) -> therefore not Demise(cora, annmarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The robb does not chase the mozelle. The robb succeed the kevin. The robb does not like the mozelle. The robb does not need the mozelle. The robb foregather the kevin. The mozelle succeed the kevin. The mozelle is untoasted. The mozelle goad the robb. The mozelle goad the kevin. The mozelle foregather the robb. The mozelle foregather the kevin. The kevin foregather the robb. If something succeed the robb and the robb foregather the mozelle then it goad the kevin. If the robb is not near then the robb succeed the kevin. If something goad the kevin then it goad the mozelle. If something is untoasted and it goad the mozelle then it is rheumatoid. If something foregather the robb then it does not need the mozelle. If the kevin succeed the robb then the robb does not need the mozelle. The mozelle is rheumatoid.", "logic": "\nnot Succeed(robb, mozelle)\nSucceed(robb, kevin)\nnot Goad(robb, mozelle)\nnot Foregather(robb, mozelle)\nForegather(robb, kevin)\nSucceed(mozelle, kevin)\nUntoasted(mozelle)\nGoad(mozelle, robb)\nGoad(mozelle, kevin)\nForegather(mozelle, robb)\nForegather(mozelle, kevin)\nForegather(kevin, robb)\nforall x (Succeed(x, robb) and Foregather(robb, mozelle) -> Goad(x, kevin))\nnot Near(robb) -> Succeed(robb, kevin)\nforall x (Goad(x, kevin) -> Goad(x, mozelle))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) and Goad(x, mozelle) -> Rheumatoid(x))\nforall x (Foregather(x, robb) -> not Foregather(x, mozelle))\nSucceed(kevin, robb) -> not Foregather(robb, mozelle)\n\nRheumatoid(mozelle)\n\nGoad(mozelle, kevin) and forall x (Goad(x, kevin) -> Goad(x, mozelle)) -> therefore Goad(mozelle, mozelle) Untoasted(mozelle) and Goad(mozelle, mozelle) and forall x (Untoasted(x) and Goad(x, mozelle) -> Rheumatoid(x)) -> therefore Rheumatoid(mozelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The allegra does not chase the candra. The allegra uniform the angelica. The allegra does not like the candra. The allegra does not need the candra. The allegra begrime the angelica. The candra uniform the angelica. The candra is aimless. The candra melodize the allegra. The candra melodize the angelica. The candra begrime the allegra. The candra begrime the angelica. The angelica begrime the allegra. If something uniform the allegra and the allegra begrime the candra then it melodize the angelica. If the allegra is not vapourific then the allegra uniform the angelica. If something melodize the angelica then it melodize the candra. If something is aimless and it melodize the candra then it is oxidised. If something begrime the allegra then it does not need the candra. If the angelica uniform the allegra then the allegra does not need the candra. The candra is not oxidised.", "logic": "\nnot Uniform(allegra, candra)\nUniform(allegra, angelica)\nnot Melodize(allegra, candra)\nnot Begrime(allegra, candra)\nBegrime(allegra, angelica)\nUniform(candra, angelica)\nAimless(candra)\nMelodize(candra, allegra)\nMelodize(candra, angelica)\nBegrime(candra, allegra)\nBegrime(candra, angelica)\nBegrime(angelica, allegra)\nforall x (Uniform(x, allegra) and Begrime(allegra, candra) -> Melodize(x, angelica))\nnot Vapourific(allegra) -> Uniform(allegra, angelica)\nforall x (Melodize(x, angelica) -> Melodize(x, candra))\nforall x (Aimless(x) and Melodize(x, candra) -> Oxidised(x))\nforall x (Begrime(x, allegra) -> not Begrime(x, candra))\nUniform(angelica, allegra) -> not Begrime(allegra, candra)\n\nnot Oxidised(candra)\n\nMelodize(candra, angelica) and forall x (Melodize(x, angelica) -> Melodize(x, candra)) -> therefore Melodize(candra, candra) Aimless(candra) and Melodize(candra, candra) and forall x (Aimless(x) and Melodize(x, candra) -> Oxidised(x)) -> therefore Oxidised(candra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The wenona does not chase the ryan. The wenona hydrolize the maggi. The wenona does not like the ryan. The wenona does not need the ryan. The wenona perm the maggi. The ryan hydrolize the maggi. The ryan is shuha. The ryan quack the wenona. The ryan quack the maggi. The ryan perm the wenona. The ryan perm the maggi. The maggi perm the wenona. If something hydrolize the wenona and the wenona perm the ryan then it quack the maggi. If the wenona is not assiduous then the wenona hydrolize the maggi. If something quack the maggi then it quack the ryan. If something is shuha and it quack the ryan then it is atonal. If something perm the wenona then it does not need the ryan. If the maggi hydrolize the wenona then the wenona does not need the ryan. The wenona is not atonal.", "logic": "\nnot Hydrolize(wenona, ryan)\nHydrolize(wenona, maggi)\nnot Quack(wenona, ryan)\nnot Perm(wenona, ryan)\nPerm(wenona, maggi)\nHydrolize(ryan, maggi)\nShuha(ryan)\nQuack(ryan, wenona)\nQuack(ryan, maggi)\nPerm(ryan, wenona)\nPerm(ryan, maggi)\nPerm(maggi, wenona)\nforall x (Hydrolize(x, wenona) and Perm(wenona, ryan) -> Quack(x, maggi))\nnot Assiduous(wenona) -> Hydrolize(wenona, maggi)\nforall x (Quack(x, maggi) -> Quack(x, ryan))\nforall x (Shuha(x) and Quack(x, ryan) -> Atonal(x))\nforall x (Perm(x, wenona) -> not Perm(x, ryan))\nHydrolize(maggi, wenona) -> not Perm(wenona, ryan)\n\nnot Atonal(wenona)\n\nforall x (Shuha(x) and Quack(x, ryan) -> Atonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The annalisa does not chase the marline. The annalisa near the shellie. The annalisa does not like the marline. The annalisa does not need the marline. The annalisa scheme the shellie. The marline near the shellie. The marline is cracked. The marline bedhop the annalisa. The marline bedhop the shellie. The marline scheme the annalisa. The marline scheme the shellie. The shellie scheme the annalisa. If something near the annalisa and the annalisa scheme the marline then it bedhop the shellie. If the annalisa is not primo then the annalisa near the shellie. If something bedhop the shellie then it bedhop the marline. If something is cracked and it bedhop the marline then it is adsorbable. If something scheme the annalisa then it does not need the marline. If the shellie near the annalisa then the annalisa does not need the marline. The annalisa bedhop the shellie.", "logic": "\nnot Near(annalisa, marline)\nNear(annalisa, shellie)\nnot Bedhop(annalisa, marline)\nnot Scheme(annalisa, marline)\nScheme(annalisa, shellie)\nNear(marline, shellie)\nCracked(marline)\nBedhop(marline, annalisa)\nBedhop(marline, shellie)\nScheme(marline, annalisa)\nScheme(marline, shellie)\nScheme(shellie, annalisa)\nforall x (Near(x, annalisa) and Scheme(annalisa, marline) -> Bedhop(x, shellie))\nnot Primo(annalisa) -> Near(annalisa, shellie)\nforall x (Bedhop(x, shellie) -> Bedhop(x, marline))\nforall x (Cracked(x) and Bedhop(x, marline) -> Adsorbable(x))\nforall x (Scheme(x, annalisa) -> not Scheme(x, marline))\nNear(shellie, annalisa) -> not Scheme(annalisa, marline)\n\nBedhop(annalisa, shellie)\n\nforall x (Near(x, annalisa) and Scheme(annalisa, marline) -> Bedhop(x, shellie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The vasily does not chase the lurline. The vasily predate the evita. The vasily does not like the lurline. The vasily does not need the lurline. The vasily clarion the evita. The lurline predate the evita. The lurline is panicled. The lurline register the vasily. The lurline register the evita. The lurline clarion the vasily. The lurline clarion the evita. The evita clarion the vasily. If something predate the vasily and the vasily clarion the lurline then it register the evita. If the vasily is not pupillary then the vasily predate the evita. If something register the evita then it register the lurline. If something is panicled and it register the lurline then it is attendant. If something clarion the vasily then it does not need the lurline. If the evita predate the vasily then the vasily does not need the lurline. The evita is not attendant.", "logic": "\nnot Predate(vasily, lurline)\nPredate(vasily, evita)\nnot Register(vasily, lurline)\nnot Clarion(vasily, lurline)\nClarion(vasily, evita)\nPredate(lurline, evita)\nPanicled(lurline)\nRegister(lurline, vasily)\nRegister(lurline, evita)\nClarion(lurline, vasily)\nClarion(lurline, evita)\nClarion(evita, vasily)\nforall x (Predate(x, vasily) and Clarion(vasily, lurline) -> Register(x, evita))\nnot Pupillary(vasily) -> Predate(vasily, evita)\nforall x (Register(x, evita) -> Register(x, lurline))\nforall x (Panicled(x) and Register(x, lurline) -> Attendant(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x, vasily) -> not Clarion(x, lurline))\nPredate(evita, vasily) -> not Clarion(vasily, lurline)\n\nnot Attendant(evita)\n\nforall x (Panicled(x) and Register(x, lurline) -> Attendant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The mohamad does not chase the corrie. The mohamad angulate the maxim. The mohamad does not like the corrie. The mohamad does not need the corrie. The mohamad totter the maxim. The corrie angulate the maxim. The corrie is unreached. The corrie crumb the mohamad. The corrie crumb the maxim. The corrie totter the mohamad. The corrie totter the maxim. The maxim totter the mohamad. If something angulate the mohamad and the mohamad totter the corrie then it crumb the maxim. If the mohamad is not hermitic then the mohamad angulate the maxim. If something crumb the maxim then it crumb the corrie. If something is unreached and it crumb the corrie then it is allegiant. If something totter the mohamad then it does not need the corrie. If the maxim angulate the mohamad then the mohamad does not need the corrie. The maxim is round.", "logic": "\nnot Angulate(mohamad, corrie)\nAngulate(mohamad, maxim)\nnot Crumb(mohamad, corrie)\nnot Totter(mohamad, corrie)\nTotter(mohamad, maxim)\nAngulate(corrie, maxim)\nUnreached(corrie)\nCrumb(corrie, mohamad)\nCrumb(corrie, maxim)\nTotter(corrie, mohamad)\nTotter(corrie, maxim)\nTotter(maxim, mohamad)\nforall x (Angulate(x, mohamad) and Totter(mohamad, corrie) -> Crumb(x, maxim))\nnot Hermitic(mohamad) -> Angulate(mohamad, maxim)\nforall x (Crumb(x, maxim) -> Crumb(x, corrie))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and Crumb(x, corrie) -> Allegiant(x))\nforall x (Totter(x, mohamad) -> not Totter(x, corrie))\nAngulate(maxim, mohamad) -> not Totter(mohamad, corrie)\n\nRound(maxim)\n\nRound(maxim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The weber does not chase the brandi. The weber complexion the inessa. The weber does not like the brandi. The weber does not need the brandi. The weber ignite the inessa. The brandi complexion the inessa. The brandi is unholy. The brandi signalize the weber. The brandi signalize the inessa. The brandi ignite the weber. The brandi ignite the inessa. The inessa ignite the weber. If something complexion the weber and the weber ignite the brandi then it signalize the inessa. If the weber is not prosy then the weber complexion the inessa. If something signalize the inessa then it signalize the brandi. If something is unholy and it signalize the brandi then it is reversible. If something ignite the weber then it does not need the brandi. If the inessa complexion the weber then the weber does not need the brandi. The weber is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Complexion(weber, brandi)\nComplexion(weber, inessa)\nnot Signalize(weber, brandi)\nnot Ignite(weber, brandi)\nIgnite(weber, inessa)\nComplexion(brandi, inessa)\nUnholy(brandi)\nSignalize(brandi, weber)\nSignalize(brandi, inessa)\nIgnite(brandi, weber)\nIgnite(brandi, inessa)\nIgnite(inessa, weber)\nforall x (Complexion(x, weber) and Ignite(weber, brandi) -> Signalize(x, inessa))\nnot Prosy(weber) -> Complexion(weber, inessa)\nforall x (Signalize(x, inessa) -> Signalize(x, brandi))\nforall x (Unholy(x) and Signalize(x, brandi) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Ignite(x, weber) -> not Ignite(x, brandi))\nComplexion(inessa, weber) -> not Ignite(weber, brandi)\n\nnot Round(weber)\n\nnot Round(weber) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "The corissa does not chase the austine. The corissa whack the marge. The corissa does not like the austine. The corissa does not need the austine. The corissa sidle the marge. The austine whack the marge. The austine is greenside. The austine conflate the corissa. The austine conflate the marge. The austine sidle the corissa. The austine sidle the marge. The marge sidle the corissa. If something whack the corissa and the corissa sidle the austine then it conflate the marge. If the corissa is not acerb then the corissa whack the marge. If something conflate the marge then it conflate the austine. If something is greenside and it conflate the austine then it is bigmouthed. If something sidle the corissa then it does not need the austine. If the marge whack the corissa then the corissa does not need the austine. The marge whack the marge.", "logic": "\nnot Whack(corissa, austine)\nWhack(corissa, marge)\nnot Conflate(corissa, austine)\nnot Sidle(corissa, austine)\nSidle(corissa, marge)\nWhack(austine, marge)\nGreenside(austine)\nConflate(austine, corissa)\nConflate(austine, marge)\nSidle(austine, corissa)\nSidle(austine, marge)\nSidle(marge, corissa)\nforall x (Whack(x, corissa) and Sidle(corissa, austine) -> Conflate(x, marge))\nnot Acerb(corissa) -> Whack(corissa, marge)\nforall x (Conflate(x, marge) -> Conflate(x, austine))\nforall x (Greenside(x) and Conflate(x, austine) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nforall x (Sidle(x, corissa) -> not Sidle(x, austine))\nWhack(marge, corissa) -> not Sidle(corissa, austine)\n\nWhack(marge, marge)\n\nWhack(marge, marge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1797"} {"premises": "Truda is uncombined. Truda is parky. Truda is trackable. Mendel is gassy. Mendel is uncombined. Mendel is parky. Mendel is thoriated. Mendel is rachitic. Danila is gassy. Danila is uncombined. Danila is parky. Danila is absurd. Catharine is parky. Catharine is thoriated. Catharine is rachitic. Catharine is trackable. If someone is parky then they are uncombined. Cold people are absurd. Danila is parky.", "logic": "\nUncombined(truda)\nParky(truda)\nTrackable(truda)\nGassy(mendel)\nUncombined(mendel)\nParky(mendel)\nThoriated(mendel)\nRachitic(mendel)\nGassy(danila)\nUncombined(danila)\nParky(danila)\nAbsurd(danila)\nParky(catharine)\nThoriated(catharine)\nRachitic(catharine)\nTrackable(catharine)\nforall x (Parky(x) -> Uncombined(x))\nforall x (Uncombined(x) -> Absurd(x))\n\nParky(danila)\n\ntherefore Parky(danila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Margery is zoic. Margery is alarming. Margery is equitable. Lucretia is grasping. Lucretia is zoic. Lucretia is alarming. Lucretia is amiss. Lucretia is timeless. Marcie is grasping. Marcie is zoic. Marcie is alarming. Marcie is dismissed. Gates is alarming. Gates is amiss. Gates is timeless. Gates is equitable. If someone is alarming then they are zoic. Cold people are dismissed. Marcie is not grasping.", "logic": "\nZoic(margery)\nAlarming(margery)\nEquitable(margery)\nGrasping(lucretia)\nZoic(lucretia)\nAlarming(lucretia)\nAmiss(lucretia)\nTimeless(lucretia)\nGrasping(marcie)\nZoic(marcie)\nAlarming(marcie)\nDismissed(marcie)\nAlarming(gates)\nAmiss(gates)\nTimeless(gates)\nEquitable(gates)\nforall x (Alarming(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Dismissed(x))\n\nnot Grasping(marcie)\n\ntherefore Grasping(marcie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Katalin is simple. Katalin is japanese. Katalin is unfearing. Fortuna is recovered. Fortuna is simple. Fortuna is japanese. Fortuna is broadside. Fortuna is sexy. Aditya is recovered. Aditya is simple. Aditya is japanese. Aditya is wondrous. Farica is japanese. Farica is broadside. Farica is sexy. Farica is unfearing. If someone is japanese then they are simple. Cold people are wondrous. Katalin is wondrous.", "logic": "\nSimple(katalin)\nJapanese(katalin)\nUnfearing(katalin)\nRecovered(fortuna)\nSimple(fortuna)\nJapanese(fortuna)\nBroadside(fortuna)\nSexy(fortuna)\nRecovered(aditya)\nSimple(aditya)\nJapanese(aditya)\nWondrous(aditya)\nJapanese(farica)\nBroadside(farica)\nSexy(farica)\nUnfearing(farica)\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> Simple(x))\nforall x (Simple(x) -> Wondrous(x))\n\nWondrous(katalin)\n\nSimple(katalin) and forall x (Simple(x) -> Wondrous(x)) -> therefore Wondrous(katalin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Bethina is gloveless. Bethina is hearable. Bethina is devalued. Roana is isoclinal. Roana is gloveless. Roana is hearable. Roana is tearing. Roana is boughless. Anni is isoclinal. Anni is gloveless. Anni is hearable. Anni is looted. Fritz is hearable. Fritz is tearing. Fritz is boughless. Fritz is devalued. If someone is hearable then they are gloveless. Cold people are looted. Roana is not looted.", "logic": "\nGloveless(bethina)\nHearable(bethina)\nDevalued(bethina)\nIsoclinal(roana)\nGloveless(roana)\nHearable(roana)\nTearing(roana)\nBoughless(roana)\nIsoclinal(anni)\nGloveless(anni)\nHearable(anni)\nLooted(anni)\nHearable(fritz)\nTearing(fritz)\nBoughless(fritz)\nDevalued(fritz)\nforall x (Hearable(x) -> Gloveless(x))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> Looted(x))\n\nnot Looted(roana)\n\nGloveless(roana) and forall x (Gloveless(x) -> Looted(x)) -> therefore Looted(roana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Alisun is botulinal. Alisun is foregoing. Alisun is phrenetic. Kacey is unsinkable. Kacey is botulinal. Kacey is foregoing. Kacey is agraphic. Kacey is infected. Meggi is unsinkable. Meggi is botulinal. Meggi is foregoing. Meggi is leathered. Eula is foregoing. Eula is agraphic. Eula is infected. Eula is phrenetic. If someone is foregoing then they are botulinal. Cold people are leathered. Eula is leathered.", "logic": "\nBotulinal(alisun)\nForegoing(alisun)\nPhrenetic(alisun)\nUnsinkable(kacey)\nBotulinal(kacey)\nForegoing(kacey)\nAgraphic(kacey)\nInfected(kacey)\nUnsinkable(meggi)\nBotulinal(meggi)\nForegoing(meggi)\nLeathered(meggi)\nForegoing(eula)\nAgraphic(eula)\nInfected(eula)\nPhrenetic(eula)\nforall x (Foregoing(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Leathered(x))\n\nLeathered(eula)\n\nForegoing(eula) and forall x (Foregoing(x) -> Botulinal(x)) -> therefore Botulinal(eula) Botulinal(eula) and forall x (Botulinal(x) -> Leathered(x)) -> therefore Leathered(eula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Carry is delinquent. Carry is exquisite. Carry is unwashed. Darien is uneventful. Darien is delinquent. Darien is exquisite. Darien is cyprian. Darien is caecal. Natalya is uneventful. Natalya is delinquent. Natalya is exquisite. Natalya is referenced. Dorri is exquisite. Dorri is cyprian. Dorri is caecal. Dorri is unwashed. If someone is exquisite then they are delinquent. Cold people are referenced. Dorri is not referenced.", "logic": "\nDelinquent(carry)\nExquisite(carry)\nUnwashed(carry)\nUneventful(darien)\nDelinquent(darien)\nExquisite(darien)\nCyprian(darien)\nCaecal(darien)\nUneventful(natalya)\nDelinquent(natalya)\nExquisite(natalya)\nReferenced(natalya)\nExquisite(dorri)\nCyprian(dorri)\nCaecal(dorri)\nUnwashed(dorri)\nforall x (Exquisite(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> Referenced(x))\n\nnot Referenced(dorri)\n\nExquisite(dorri) and forall x (Exquisite(x) -> Delinquent(x)) -> therefore Delinquent(dorri) Delinquent(dorri) and forall x (Delinquent(x) -> Referenced(x)) -> therefore Referenced(dorri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Marlena is frontmost. Marlena is hidebound. Marlena is exorbitant. Emmery is skewed. Emmery is frontmost. Emmery is hidebound. Emmery is reviving. Emmery is acquitted. Arleta is skewed. Arleta is frontmost. Arleta is hidebound. Arleta is exculpated. Hope is hidebound. Hope is reviving. Hope is acquitted. Hope is exorbitant. If someone is hidebound then they are frontmost. Cold people are exculpated. Arleta is not acquitted.", "logic": "\nFrontmost(marlena)\nHidebound(marlena)\nExorbitant(marlena)\nSkewed(emmery)\nFrontmost(emmery)\nHidebound(emmery)\nReviving(emmery)\nAcquitted(emmery)\nSkewed(arleta)\nFrontmost(arleta)\nHidebound(arleta)\nExculpated(arleta)\nHidebound(hope)\nReviving(hope)\nAcquitted(hope)\nExorbitant(hope)\nforall x (Hidebound(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) -> Exculpated(x))\n\nnot Acquitted(arleta)\n\nnot Acquitted(arleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Tymon is annalistic. Tymon is mirky. Tymon is merging. Wandie is tilted. Wandie is annalistic. Wandie is mirky. Wandie is shiftless. Wandie is serrate. Myna is tilted. Myna is annalistic. Myna is mirky. Myna is esthetical. Wallis is mirky. Wallis is shiftless. Wallis is serrate. Wallis is merging. If someone is mirky then they are annalistic. Cold people are esthetical. Myna is shiftless.", "logic": "\nAnnalistic(tymon)\nMirky(tymon)\nMerging(tymon)\nTilted(wandie)\nAnnalistic(wandie)\nMirky(wandie)\nShiftless(wandie)\nSerrate(wandie)\nTilted(myna)\nAnnalistic(myna)\nMirky(myna)\nEsthetical(myna)\nMirky(wallis)\nShiftless(wallis)\nSerrate(wallis)\nMerging(wallis)\nforall x (Mirky(x) -> Annalistic(x))\nforall x (Annalistic(x) -> Esthetical(x))\n\nShiftless(myna)\n\nShiftless(myna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Jed is sightly. Jed is marshy. Jed is pumped. Everett is fertile. Everett is sightly. Everett is marshy. Everett is buirdly. Everett is etched. Wilhelm is fertile. Wilhelm is sightly. Wilhelm is marshy. Wilhelm is isoclinal. Truda is marshy. Truda is buirdly. Truda is etched. Truda is pumped. If someone is marshy then they are sightly. Cold people are isoclinal. Jed is not etched.", "logic": "\nSightly(jed)\nMarshy(jed)\nPumped(jed)\nFertile(everett)\nSightly(everett)\nMarshy(everett)\nBuirdly(everett)\nEtched(everett)\nFertile(wilhelm)\nSightly(wilhelm)\nMarshy(wilhelm)\nIsoclinal(wilhelm)\nMarshy(truda)\nBuirdly(truda)\nEtched(truda)\nPumped(truda)\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Sightly(x) -> Isoclinal(x))\n\nnot Etched(jed)\n\nnot Etched(jed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Giavani is collective. Giavani is eucaryotic. Giavani is roaring. Dahlia is legion. Dahlia is collective. Dahlia is eucaryotic. Dahlia is boytrose. Dahlia is promising. Renado is legion. Renado is collective. Renado is eucaryotic. Renado is aerophilic. Marry is eucaryotic. Marry is boytrose. Marry is promising. Marry is roaring. If someone is eucaryotic then they are collective. Cold people are aerophilic. Giavani is boytrose.", "logic": "\nCollective(giavani)\nEucaryotic(giavani)\nRoaring(giavani)\nLegion(dahlia)\nCollective(dahlia)\nEucaryotic(dahlia)\nBoytrose(dahlia)\nPromising(dahlia)\nLegion(renado)\nCollective(renado)\nEucaryotic(renado)\nAerophilic(renado)\nEucaryotic(marry)\nBoytrose(marry)\nPromising(marry)\nRoaring(marry)\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Collective(x))\nforall x (Collective(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\n\nBoytrose(giavani)\n\nBoytrose(giavani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Shay is senescent. Shay is spiraling. Shay is phyletic. Reiko is coptic. Reiko is senescent. Reiko is spiraling. Reiko is local. Reiko is ungreased. Lise is coptic. Lise is senescent. Lise is spiraling. Lise is upstair. Berchtold is spiraling. Berchtold is local. Berchtold is ungreased. Berchtold is phyletic. If someone is spiraling then they are senescent. Cold people are upstair. Shay is not coptic.", "logic": "\nSenescent(shay)\nSpiraling(shay)\nPhyletic(shay)\nCoptic(reiko)\nSenescent(reiko)\nSpiraling(reiko)\nLocal(reiko)\nUngreased(reiko)\nCoptic(lise)\nSenescent(lise)\nSpiraling(lise)\nUpstair(lise)\nSpiraling(berchtold)\nLocal(berchtold)\nUngreased(berchtold)\nPhyletic(berchtold)\nforall x (Spiraling(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> Upstair(x))\n\nnot Coptic(shay)\n\nnot Coptic(shay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "Esta is acanthoid. Esta is trillion. Esta is snarly. Bennie is nativist. Bennie is acanthoid. Bennie is trillion. Bennie is ascribable. Bennie is xiii. Phylys is nativist. Phylys is acanthoid. Phylys is trillion. Phylys is savorless. Cortese is trillion. Cortese is ascribable. Cortese is xiii. Cortese is snarly. If someone is trillion then they are acanthoid. Cold people are savorless. Cortese is nativist.", "logic": "\nAcanthoid(esta)\nTrillion(esta)\nSnarly(esta)\nNativist(bennie)\nAcanthoid(bennie)\nTrillion(bennie)\nAscribable(bennie)\nXiii(bennie)\nNativist(phylys)\nAcanthoid(phylys)\nTrillion(phylys)\nSavorless(phylys)\nTrillion(cortese)\nAscribable(cortese)\nXiii(cortese)\nSnarly(cortese)\nforall x (Trillion(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) -> Savorless(x))\n\nNativist(cortese)\n\nNativist(cortese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-236"} {"premises": "The esta loot the ardra. The esta conk the ardra. The ardra is myriad. The ardra is milanese. The ardra loot the esta. The ardra bawl the esta. The ardra conk the esta. If someone conk the esta then they visit the ardra. If someone conk the ardra and they visit the esta then they are leased. The ardra is myriad.", "logic": "\nLoot(esta, ardra)\nConk(esta, ardra)\nMyriad(ardra)\nMilanese(ardra)\nLoot(ardra, esta)\nBawl(ardra, esta)\nConk(ardra, esta)\nforall x (Conk(x, esta) -> Conk(x, ardra))\nforall x (Conk(x, ardra) and Conk(x, esta) -> Leased(x))\n\nMyriad(ardra)\n\ntherefore Myriad(ardra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The dorolice libel the alston. The dorolice goad the alston. The alston is magyar. The alston is dermic. The alston libel the dorolice. The alston dredge the dorolice. The alston goad the dorolice. If someone goad the dorolice then they visit the alston. If someone goad the alston and they visit the dorolice then they are bicyclic. The alston does not see the dorolice.", "logic": "\nLibel(dorolice, alston)\nGoad(dorolice, alston)\nMagyar(alston)\nDermic(alston)\nLibel(alston, dorolice)\nDredge(alston, dorolice)\nGoad(alston, dorolice)\nforall x (Goad(x, dorolice) -> Goad(x, alston))\nforall x (Goad(x, alston) and Goad(x, dorolice) -> Bicyclic(x))\n\nnot Dredge(alston, dorolice)\n\ntherefore Dredge(alston, dorolice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The wilbert etch the ripley. The wilbert remarry the ripley. The ripley is chafflike. The ripley is possessed. The ripley etch the wilbert. The ripley assonate the wilbert. The ripley remarry the wilbert. If someone remarry the wilbert then they visit the ripley. If someone remarry the ripley and they visit the wilbert then they are splotched. The ripley remarry the ripley.", "logic": "\nEtch(wilbert, ripley)\nRemarry(wilbert, ripley)\nChafflike(ripley)\nPossessed(ripley)\nEtch(ripley, wilbert)\nAssonate(ripley, wilbert)\nRemarry(ripley, wilbert)\nforall x (Remarry(x, wilbert) -> Remarry(x, ripley))\nforall x (Remarry(x, ripley) and Remarry(x, wilbert) -> Splotched(x))\n\nRemarry(ripley, ripley)\n\nRemarry(ripley, wilbert) and forall x (Remarry(x, wilbert) -> Remarry(x, ripley)) -> therefore Remarry(ripley, ripley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The marilin tumble the modestine. The marilin chime the modestine. The modestine is heinous. The modestine is quelled. The modestine tumble the marilin. The modestine accrete the marilin. The modestine chime the marilin. If someone chime the marilin then they visit the modestine. If someone chime the modestine and they visit the marilin then they are timeworn. The modestine does not visit the modestine.", "logic": "\nTumble(marilin, modestine)\nChime(marilin, modestine)\nHeinous(modestine)\nQuelled(modestine)\nTumble(modestine, marilin)\nAccrete(modestine, marilin)\nChime(modestine, marilin)\nforall x (Chime(x, marilin) -> Chime(x, modestine))\nforall x (Chime(x, modestine) and Chime(x, marilin) -> Timeworn(x))\n\nnot Chime(modestine, modestine)\n\nChime(modestine, marilin) and forall x (Chime(x, marilin) -> Chime(x, modestine)) -> therefore Chime(modestine, modestine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The dru undo the misha. The dru upchuck the misha. The misha is rampant. The misha is inshore. The misha undo the dru. The misha scruple the dru. The misha upchuck the dru. If someone upchuck the dru then they visit the misha. If someone upchuck the misha and they visit the dru then they are defoliated. The misha is defoliated.", "logic": "\nUndo(dru, misha)\nUpchuck(dru, misha)\nRampant(misha)\nInshore(misha)\nUndo(misha, dru)\nScruple(misha, dru)\nUpchuck(misha, dru)\nforall x (Upchuck(x, dru) -> Upchuck(x, misha))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, misha) and Upchuck(x, dru) -> Defoliated(x))\n\nDefoliated(misha)\n\nUpchuck(misha, dru) and forall x (Upchuck(x, dru) -> Upchuck(x, misha)) -> therefore Upchuck(misha, misha) Upchuck(misha, misha) and Upchuck(misha, dru) and forall x (Upchuck(x, misha) and Upchuck(x, dru) -> Defoliated(x)) -> therefore Defoliated(misha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The shlomo fascinate the carmine. The shlomo bong the carmine. The carmine is frowsy. The carmine is homiletic. The carmine fascinate the shlomo. The carmine wager the shlomo. The carmine bong the shlomo. If someone bong the shlomo then they visit the carmine. If someone bong the carmine and they visit the shlomo then they are bipolar. The carmine is not bipolar.", "logic": "\nFascinate(shlomo, carmine)\nBong(shlomo, carmine)\nFrowsy(carmine)\nHomiletic(carmine)\nFascinate(carmine, shlomo)\nWager(carmine, shlomo)\nBong(carmine, shlomo)\nforall x (Bong(x, shlomo) -> Bong(x, carmine))\nforall x (Bong(x, carmine) and Bong(x, shlomo) -> Bipolar(x))\n\nnot Bipolar(carmine)\n\nBong(carmine, shlomo) and forall x (Bong(x, shlomo) -> Bong(x, carmine)) -> therefore Bong(carmine, carmine) Bong(carmine, carmine) and Bong(carmine, shlomo) and forall x (Bong(x, carmine) and Bong(x, shlomo) -> Bipolar(x)) -> therefore Bipolar(carmine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The mignonne croak the tiffy. The mignonne rethink the tiffy. The tiffy is purifying. The tiffy is unthematic. The tiffy croak the mignonne. The tiffy anglicise the mignonne. The tiffy rethink the mignonne. If someone rethink the mignonne then they visit the tiffy. If someone rethink the tiffy and they visit the mignonne then they are forty. The mignonne is not forty.", "logic": "\nCroak(mignonne, tiffy)\nRethink(mignonne, tiffy)\nPurifying(tiffy)\nUnthematic(tiffy)\nCroak(tiffy, mignonne)\nAnglicise(tiffy, mignonne)\nRethink(tiffy, mignonne)\nforall x (Rethink(x, mignonne) -> Rethink(x, tiffy))\nforall x (Rethink(x, tiffy) and Rethink(x, mignonne) -> Forty(x))\n\nnot Forty(mignonne)\n\nforall x (Rethink(x, tiffy) and Rethink(x, mignonne) -> Forty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The barbey parch the athena. The barbey totalize the athena. The athena is numb. The athena is elected. The athena parch the barbey. The athena kayo the barbey. The athena totalize the barbey. If someone totalize the barbey then they visit the athena. If someone totalize the athena and they visit the barbey then they are dianoetic. The athena parch the athena.", "logic": "\nParch(barbey, athena)\nTotalize(barbey, athena)\nNumb(athena)\nElected(athena)\nParch(athena, barbey)\nKayo(athena, barbey)\nTotalize(athena, barbey)\nforall x (Totalize(x, barbey) -> Totalize(x, athena))\nforall x (Totalize(x, athena) and Totalize(x, barbey) -> Dianoetic(x))\n\nParch(athena, athena)\n\nParch(athena, athena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The ingelbert pother the cheslie. The ingelbert chirrup the cheslie. The cheslie is chunky. The cheslie is polish. The cheslie pother the ingelbert. The cheslie curtain the ingelbert. The cheslie chirrup the ingelbert. If someone chirrup the ingelbert then they visit the cheslie. If someone chirrup the cheslie and they visit the ingelbert then they are overhanded. The ingelbert does not visit the ingelbert.", "logic": "\nPother(ingelbert, cheslie)\nChirrup(ingelbert, cheslie)\nChunky(cheslie)\nPolish(cheslie)\nPother(cheslie, ingelbert)\nCurtain(cheslie, ingelbert)\nChirrup(cheslie, ingelbert)\nforall x (Chirrup(x, ingelbert) -> Chirrup(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Chirrup(x, cheslie) and Chirrup(x, ingelbert) -> Overhanded(x))\n\nnot Chirrup(ingelbert, ingelbert)\n\nnot Chirrup(ingelbert, ingelbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The atalanta patronize the parrnell. The atalanta starve the parrnell. The parrnell is unmediated. The parrnell is archeozoic. The parrnell patronize the atalanta. The parrnell tail the atalanta. The parrnell starve the atalanta. If someone starve the atalanta then they visit the parrnell. If someone starve the parrnell and they visit the atalanta then they are macro. The atalanta is archeozoic.", "logic": "\nPatronize(atalanta, parrnell)\nStarve(atalanta, parrnell)\nUnmediated(parrnell)\nArcheozoic(parrnell)\nPatronize(parrnell, atalanta)\nTail(parrnell, atalanta)\nStarve(parrnell, atalanta)\nforall x (Starve(x, atalanta) -> Starve(x, parrnell))\nforall x (Starve(x, parrnell) and Starve(x, atalanta) -> Macro(x))\n\nArcheozoic(atalanta)\n\nArcheozoic(atalanta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The delphinia ruin the hildy. The delphinia disguise the hildy. The hildy is restful. The hildy is cerous. The hildy ruin the delphinia. The hildy legitimize the delphinia. The hildy disguise the delphinia. If someone disguise the delphinia then they visit the hildy. If someone disguise the hildy and they visit the delphinia then they are smitten. The delphinia is not restful.", "logic": "\nRuin(delphinia, hildy)\nDisguise(delphinia, hildy)\nRestful(hildy)\nCerous(hildy)\nRuin(hildy, delphinia)\nLegitimize(hildy, delphinia)\nDisguise(hildy, delphinia)\nforall x (Disguise(x, delphinia) -> Disguise(x, hildy))\nforall x (Disguise(x, hildy) and Disguise(x, delphinia) -> Smitten(x))\n\nnot Restful(delphinia)\n\nnot Restful(delphinia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The shawnee inflict the adelice. The shawnee breed the adelice. The adelice is autoecious. The adelice is buirdly. The adelice inflict the shawnee. The adelice announce the shawnee. The adelice breed the shawnee. If someone breed the shawnee then they visit the adelice. If someone breed the adelice and they visit the shawnee then they are indigent. The adelice announce the adelice.", "logic": "\nInflict(shawnee, adelice)\nBreed(shawnee, adelice)\nAutoecious(adelice)\nBuirdly(adelice)\nInflict(adelice, shawnee)\nAnnounce(adelice, shawnee)\nBreed(adelice, shawnee)\nforall x (Breed(x, shawnee) -> Breed(x, adelice))\nforall x (Breed(x, adelice) and Breed(x, shawnee) -> Indigent(x))\n\nAnnounce(adelice, adelice)\n\nAnnounce(adelice, adelice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-227"} {"premises": "The francyne trisect the modesta. The francyne is effectual. The francyne is middling. The francyne is affixial. The francyne is cesarian. The francyne is diverting. The francyne deodorise the modesta. The francyne armour the modesta. The modesta trisect the francyne. The modesta is effectual. The modesta is affixial. The modesta is cesarian. The modesta is diverting. The modesta deodorise the francyne. The modesta armour the francyne. If someone armour the modesta then they like the francyne. If someone deodorise the francyne then they chase the francyne. The francyne trisect the modesta.", "logic": "\nTrisect(francyne, modesta)\nEffectual(francyne)\nMiddling(francyne)\nAffixial(francyne)\nCesarian(francyne)\nDiverting(francyne)\nDeodorise(francyne, modesta)\nArmour(francyne, modesta)\nTrisect(modesta, francyne)\nEffectual(modesta)\nAffixial(modesta)\nCesarian(modesta)\nDiverting(modesta)\nDeodorise(modesta, francyne)\nArmour(modesta, francyne)\nforall x (Armour(x, modesta) -> Deodorise(x, francyne))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, francyne) -> Trisect(x, francyne))\n\nTrisect(francyne, modesta)\n\ntherefore Trisect(francyne, modesta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The helaina handcuff the clo. The helaina is crowing. The helaina is peritoneal. The helaina is yankee. The helaina is finnish. The helaina is persuasive. The helaina quantize the clo. The helaina turf the clo. The clo handcuff the helaina. The clo is crowing. The clo is yankee. The clo is finnish. The clo is persuasive. The clo quantize the helaina. The clo turf the helaina. If someone turf the clo then they like the helaina. If someone quantize the helaina then they chase the helaina. The helaina is not crowing.", "logic": "\nHandcuff(helaina, clo)\nCrowing(helaina)\nPeritoneal(helaina)\nYankee(helaina)\nFinnish(helaina)\nPersuasive(helaina)\nQuantize(helaina, clo)\nTurf(helaina, clo)\nHandcuff(clo, helaina)\nCrowing(clo)\nYankee(clo)\nFinnish(clo)\nPersuasive(clo)\nQuantize(clo, helaina)\nTurf(clo, helaina)\nforall x (Turf(x, clo) -> Quantize(x, helaina))\nforall x (Quantize(x, helaina) -> Handcuff(x, helaina))\n\nnot Crowing(helaina)\n\ntherefore Crowing(helaina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The urbanus ride the margi. The urbanus is endogenous. The urbanus is yummy. The urbanus is sweptwing. The urbanus is plaguy. The urbanus is tibetan. The urbanus armour the margi. The urbanus order the margi. The margi ride the urbanus. The margi is endogenous. The margi is sweptwing. The margi is plaguy. The margi is tibetan. The margi armour the urbanus. The margi order the urbanus. If someone order the margi then they like the urbanus. If someone armour the urbanus then they chase the urbanus. The urbanus armour the urbanus.", "logic": "\nRide(urbanus, margi)\nEndogenous(urbanus)\nYummy(urbanus)\nSweptwing(urbanus)\nPlaguy(urbanus)\nTibetan(urbanus)\nArmour(urbanus, margi)\nOrder(urbanus, margi)\nRide(margi, urbanus)\nEndogenous(margi)\nSweptwing(margi)\nPlaguy(margi)\nTibetan(margi)\nArmour(margi, urbanus)\nOrder(margi, urbanus)\nforall x (Order(x, margi) -> Armour(x, urbanus))\nforall x (Armour(x, urbanus) -> Ride(x, urbanus))\n\nArmour(urbanus, urbanus)\n\nOrder(urbanus, margi) and forall x (Order(x, margi) -> Armour(x, urbanus)) -> therefore Armour(urbanus, urbanus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The roseanna prostrate the stanfield. The roseanna is xxvii. The roseanna is booted. The roseanna is undeclared. The roseanna is narrative. The roseanna is daredevil. The roseanna depart the stanfield. The roseanna consociate the stanfield. The stanfield prostrate the roseanna. The stanfield is xxvii. The stanfield is undeclared. The stanfield is narrative. The stanfield is daredevil. The stanfield depart the roseanna. The stanfield consociate the roseanna. If someone consociate the stanfield then they like the roseanna. If someone depart the roseanna then they chase the roseanna. The roseanna does not like the roseanna.", "logic": "\nProstrate(roseanna, stanfield)\nXxvii(roseanna)\nBooted(roseanna)\nUndeclared(roseanna)\nNarrative(roseanna)\nDaredevil(roseanna)\nDepart(roseanna, stanfield)\nConsociate(roseanna, stanfield)\nProstrate(stanfield, roseanna)\nXxvii(stanfield)\nUndeclared(stanfield)\nNarrative(stanfield)\nDaredevil(stanfield)\nDepart(stanfield, roseanna)\nConsociate(stanfield, roseanna)\nforall x (Consociate(x, stanfield) -> Depart(x, roseanna))\nforall x (Depart(x, roseanna) -> Prostrate(x, roseanna))\n\nnot Depart(roseanna, roseanna)\n\nConsociate(roseanna, stanfield) and forall x (Consociate(x, stanfield) -> Depart(x, roseanna)) -> therefore Depart(roseanna, roseanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The biddy leach the atalanta. The biddy is uneasy. The biddy is alienating. The biddy is osmotic. The biddy is pesky. The biddy is robustious. The biddy vibrate the atalanta. The biddy arrest the atalanta. The atalanta leach the biddy. The atalanta is uneasy. The atalanta is osmotic. The atalanta is pesky. The atalanta is robustious. The atalanta vibrate the biddy. The atalanta arrest the biddy. If someone arrest the atalanta then they like the biddy. If someone vibrate the biddy then they chase the biddy. The biddy leach the biddy.", "logic": "\nLeach(biddy, atalanta)\nUneasy(biddy)\nAlienating(biddy)\nOsmotic(biddy)\nPesky(biddy)\nRobustious(biddy)\nVibrate(biddy, atalanta)\nArrest(biddy, atalanta)\nLeach(atalanta, biddy)\nUneasy(atalanta)\nOsmotic(atalanta)\nPesky(atalanta)\nRobustious(atalanta)\nVibrate(atalanta, biddy)\nArrest(atalanta, biddy)\nforall x (Arrest(x, atalanta) -> Vibrate(x, biddy))\nforall x (Vibrate(x, biddy) -> Leach(x, biddy))\n\nLeach(biddy, biddy)\n\nArrest(biddy, atalanta) and forall x (Arrest(x, atalanta) -> Vibrate(x, biddy)) -> therefore Vibrate(biddy, biddy) Vibrate(biddy, biddy) and forall x (Vibrate(x, biddy) -> Leach(x, biddy)) -> therefore Leach(biddy, biddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The gianna ford the rebeka. The gianna is tilted. The gianna is gabby. The gianna is seminal. The gianna is spindly. The gianna is randy. The gianna rail the rebeka. The gianna schmoose the rebeka. The rebeka ford the gianna. The rebeka is tilted. The rebeka is seminal. The rebeka is spindly. The rebeka is randy. The rebeka rail the gianna. The rebeka schmoose the gianna. If someone schmoose the rebeka then they like the gianna. If someone rail the gianna then they chase the gianna. The gianna does not chase the gianna.", "logic": "\nFord(gianna, rebeka)\nTilted(gianna)\nGabby(gianna)\nSeminal(gianna)\nSpindly(gianna)\nRandy(gianna)\nRail(gianna, rebeka)\nSchmoose(gianna, rebeka)\nFord(rebeka, gianna)\nTilted(rebeka)\nSeminal(rebeka)\nSpindly(rebeka)\nRandy(rebeka)\nRail(rebeka, gianna)\nSchmoose(rebeka, gianna)\nforall x (Schmoose(x, rebeka) -> Rail(x, gianna))\nforall x (Rail(x, gianna) -> Ford(x, gianna))\n\nnot Ford(gianna, gianna)\n\nSchmoose(gianna, rebeka) and forall x (Schmoose(x, rebeka) -> Rail(x, gianna)) -> therefore Rail(gianna, gianna) Rail(gianna, gianna) and forall x (Rail(x, gianna) -> Ford(x, gianna)) -> therefore Ford(gianna, gianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The kassia blotch the gretal. The kassia is shackled. The kassia is snuffly. The kassia is comal. The kassia is wheeled. The kassia is eponymous. The kassia closure the gretal. The kassia pigment the gretal. The gretal blotch the kassia. The gretal is shackled. The gretal is comal. The gretal is wheeled. The gretal is eponymous. The gretal closure the kassia. The gretal pigment the kassia. If someone pigment the gretal then they like the kassia. If someone closure the kassia then they chase the kassia. The gretal is not snuffly.", "logic": "\nBlotch(kassia, gretal)\nShackled(kassia)\nSnuffly(kassia)\nComal(kassia)\nWheeled(kassia)\nEponymous(kassia)\nClosure(kassia, gretal)\nPigment(kassia, gretal)\nBlotch(gretal, kassia)\nShackled(gretal)\nComal(gretal)\nWheeled(gretal)\nEponymous(gretal)\nClosure(gretal, kassia)\nPigment(gretal, kassia)\nforall x (Pigment(x, gretal) -> Closure(x, kassia))\nforall x (Closure(x, kassia) -> Blotch(x, kassia))\n\nnot Snuffly(gretal)\n\nnot Snuffly(gretal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The thomasin stammer the marquita. The thomasin is festal. The thomasin is auxinic. The thomasin is mullioned. The thomasin is unwearable. The thomasin is dramatic. The thomasin drum the marquita. The thomasin perorate the marquita. The marquita stammer the thomasin. The marquita is festal. The marquita is mullioned. The marquita is unwearable. The marquita is dramatic. The marquita drum the thomasin. The marquita perorate the thomasin. If someone perorate the marquita then they like the thomasin. If someone drum the thomasin then they chase the thomasin. The thomasin perorate the thomasin.", "logic": "\nStammer(thomasin, marquita)\nFestal(thomasin)\nAuxinic(thomasin)\nMullioned(thomasin)\nUnwearable(thomasin)\nDramatic(thomasin)\nDrum(thomasin, marquita)\nPerorate(thomasin, marquita)\nStammer(marquita, thomasin)\nFestal(marquita)\nMullioned(marquita)\nUnwearable(marquita)\nDramatic(marquita)\nDrum(marquita, thomasin)\nPerorate(marquita, thomasin)\nforall x (Perorate(x, marquita) -> Drum(x, thomasin))\nforall x (Drum(x, thomasin) -> Stammer(x, thomasin))\n\nPerorate(thomasin, thomasin)\n\nPerorate(thomasin, thomasin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The terry price the hamil. The terry is bidentate. The terry is plotted. The terry is disklike. The terry is squeaky. The terry is maleficent. The terry belly the hamil. The terry subscribe the hamil. The hamil price the terry. The hamil is bidentate. The hamil is disklike. The hamil is squeaky. The hamil is maleficent. The hamil belly the terry. The hamil subscribe the terry. If someone subscribe the hamil then they like the terry. If someone belly the terry then they chase the terry. The hamil does not chase the hamil.", "logic": "\nPrice(terry, hamil)\nBidentate(terry)\nPlotted(terry)\nDisklike(terry)\nSqueaky(terry)\nMaleficent(terry)\nBelly(terry, hamil)\nSubscribe(terry, hamil)\nPrice(hamil, terry)\nBidentate(hamil)\nDisklike(hamil)\nSqueaky(hamil)\nMaleficent(hamil)\nBelly(hamil, terry)\nSubscribe(hamil, terry)\nforall x (Subscribe(x, hamil) -> Belly(x, terry))\nforall x (Belly(x, terry) -> Price(x, terry))\n\nnot Price(hamil, hamil)\n\nnot Price(hamil, hamil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The dot gibber the laurianne. The dot is unreported. The dot is cockeyed. The dot is articled. The dot is linked. The dot is reverent. The dot incense the laurianne. The dot activate the laurianne. The laurianne gibber the dot. The laurianne is unreported. The laurianne is articled. The laurianne is linked. The laurianne is reverent. The laurianne incense the dot. The laurianne activate the dot. If someone activate the laurianne then they like the dot. If someone incense the dot then they chase the dot. The laurianne incense the laurianne.", "logic": "\nGibber(dot, laurianne)\nUnreported(dot)\nCockeyed(dot)\nArticled(dot)\nLinked(dot)\nReverent(dot)\nIncense(dot, laurianne)\nActivate(dot, laurianne)\nGibber(laurianne, dot)\nUnreported(laurianne)\nArticled(laurianne)\nLinked(laurianne)\nReverent(laurianne)\nIncense(laurianne, dot)\nActivate(laurianne, dot)\nforall x (Activate(x, laurianne) -> Incense(x, dot))\nforall x (Incense(x, dot) -> Gibber(x, dot))\n\nIncense(laurianne, laurianne)\n\nIncense(laurianne, laurianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Kathleen is enervating. Berkie is aortic. Sorcha is muzzy. If someone is muzzy then they are chordate. If someone is muzzy and enervating then they are moderne. Nice people are enervating. If someone is moderne then they are muzzy. Red people are cutthroat. If someone is enervating then they are cutthroat. If Berkie is cutthroat then Berkie is chordate. If someone is muzzy and enervating then they are moderne. Kathleen is enervating.", "logic": "\nEnervating(kathleen)\nAortic(berkie)\nMuzzy(sorcha)\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Chordate(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) and Enervating(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) -> Enervating(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Cutthroat(x))\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Cutthroat(x))\nCutthroat(berkie) -> Chordate(berkie)\nforall x (Muzzy(x) and Enervating(x) -> Moderne(x))\n\nEnervating(kathleen)\n\ntherefore Enervating(kathleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Kristi is sedative. Sabra is engorged. Conrad is anatropous. If someone is anatropous then they are eyelike. If someone is anatropous and sedative then they are cxxv. Nice people are sedative. If someone is cxxv then they are anatropous. Red people are absolute. If someone is sedative then they are absolute. If Sabra is absolute then Sabra is eyelike. If someone is anatropous and sedative then they are cxxv. Kristi is not sedative.", "logic": "\nSedative(kristi)\nEngorged(sabra)\nAnatropous(conrad)\nforall x (Anatropous(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Anatropous(x) and Sedative(x) -> Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Eyelike(x) -> Sedative(x))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Anatropous(x))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Absolute(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Absolute(x))\nAbsolute(sabra) -> Eyelike(sabra)\nforall x (Anatropous(x) and Sedative(x) -> Cxxv(x))\n\nnot Sedative(kristi)\n\ntherefore Sedative(kristi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Barnard is asserting. Thedrick is venous. Kippie is fooling. If someone is fooling then they are uncool. If someone is fooling and asserting then they are aramean. Nice people are asserting. If someone is aramean then they are fooling. Red people are calendered. If someone is asserting then they are calendered. If Thedrick is calendered then Thedrick is uncool. If someone is fooling and asserting then they are aramean. Barnard is calendered.", "logic": "\nAsserting(barnard)\nVenous(thedrick)\nFooling(kippie)\nforall x (Fooling(x) -> Uncool(x))\nforall x (Fooling(x) and Asserting(x) -> Aramean(x))\nforall x (Uncool(x) -> Asserting(x))\nforall x (Aramean(x) -> Fooling(x))\nforall x (Aramean(x) -> Calendered(x))\nforall x (Asserting(x) -> Calendered(x))\nCalendered(thedrick) -> Uncool(thedrick)\nforall x (Fooling(x) and Asserting(x) -> Aramean(x))\n\nCalendered(barnard)\n\nAsserting(barnard) and forall x (Asserting(x) -> Calendered(x)) -> therefore Calendered(barnard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Babita is invitatory. Yetty is sardinian. Dawn is laborious. If someone is laborious then they are hidebound. If someone is laborious and invitatory then they are combed. Nice people are invitatory. If someone is combed then they are laborious. Red people are lxxviii. If someone is invitatory then they are lxxviii. If Yetty is lxxviii then Yetty is hidebound. If someone is laborious and invitatory then they are combed. Dawn is not hidebound.", "logic": "\nInvitatory(babita)\nSardinian(yetty)\nLaborious(dawn)\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Hidebound(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) and Invitatory(x) -> Combed(x))\nforall x (Hidebound(x) -> Invitatory(x))\nforall x (Combed(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Combed(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nLxxviii(yetty) -> Hidebound(yetty)\nforall x (Laborious(x) and Invitatory(x) -> Combed(x))\n\nnot Hidebound(dawn)\n\nLaborious(dawn) and forall x (Laborious(x) -> Hidebound(x)) -> therefore Hidebound(dawn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Eunice is generative. Fancy is openhanded. Neysa is airsick. If someone is airsick then they are forlorn. If someone is airsick and generative then they are moving. Nice people are generative. If someone is moving then they are airsick. Red people are panicled. If someone is generative then they are panicled. If Fancy is panicled then Fancy is forlorn. If someone is airsick and generative then they are moving. Neysa is generative.", "logic": "\nGenerative(eunice)\nOpenhanded(fancy)\nAirsick(neysa)\nforall x (Airsick(x) -> Forlorn(x))\nforall x (Airsick(x) and Generative(x) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Forlorn(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) -> Airsick(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) -> Panicled(x))\nforall x (Generative(x) -> Panicled(x))\nPanicled(fancy) -> Forlorn(fancy)\nforall x (Airsick(x) and Generative(x) -> Moving(x))\n\nGenerative(neysa)\n\nAirsick(neysa) and forall x (Airsick(x) -> Forlorn(x)) -> therefore Forlorn(neysa) Forlorn(neysa) and forall x (Forlorn(x) -> Generative(x)) -> therefore Generative(neysa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Kelli is guided. Ernest is godly. Desiri is amorous. If someone is amorous then they are touristed. If someone is amorous and guided then they are recherche. Nice people are guided. If someone is recherche then they are amorous. Red people are unclaimed. If someone is guided then they are unclaimed. If Ernest is unclaimed then Ernest is touristed. If someone is amorous and guided then they are recherche. Desiri is not guided.", "logic": "\nGuided(kelli)\nGodly(ernest)\nAmorous(desiri)\nforall x (Amorous(x) -> Touristed(x))\nforall x (Amorous(x) and Guided(x) -> Recherche(x))\nforall x (Touristed(x) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Amorous(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nUnclaimed(ernest) -> Touristed(ernest)\nforall x (Amorous(x) and Guided(x) -> Recherche(x))\n\nnot Guided(desiri)\n\nAmorous(desiri) and forall x (Amorous(x) -> Touristed(x)) -> therefore Touristed(desiri) Touristed(desiri) and forall x (Touristed(x) -> Guided(x)) -> therefore Guided(desiri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Darelle is upstanding. Saba is offending. Guthrey is twelve. If someone is twelve then they are ingenious. If someone is twelve and upstanding then they are redeeming. Nice people are upstanding. If someone is redeeming then they are twelve. Red people are cloudlike. If someone is upstanding then they are cloudlike. If Saba is cloudlike then Saba is ingenious. If someone is twelve and upstanding then they are redeeming. Darelle is not redeeming.", "logic": "\nUpstanding(darelle)\nOffending(saba)\nTwelve(guthrey)\nforall x (Twelve(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Twelve(x) and Upstanding(x) -> Redeeming(x))\nforall x (Ingenious(x) -> Upstanding(x))\nforall x (Redeeming(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Redeeming(x) -> Cloudlike(x))\nforall x (Upstanding(x) -> Cloudlike(x))\nCloudlike(saba) -> Ingenious(saba)\nforall x (Twelve(x) and Upstanding(x) -> Redeeming(x))\n\nnot Redeeming(darelle)\n\nforall x (Twelve(x) and Upstanding(x) -> Redeeming(x)) <- forall x (Redeeming(x) -> Twelve(x)) <- forall x (Twelve(x) and Upstanding(x) -> Redeeming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Scarlet is exocrine. Gisela is virtuous. Waverley is soulless. If someone is soulless then they are enforced. If someone is soulless and exocrine then they are hobnailed. Nice people are exocrine. If someone is hobnailed then they are soulless. Red people are taoist. If someone is exocrine then they are taoist. If Gisela is taoist then Gisela is enforced. If someone is soulless and exocrine then they are hobnailed. Gisela is taoist.", "logic": "\nExocrine(scarlet)\nVirtuous(gisela)\nSoulless(waverley)\nforall x (Soulless(x) -> Enforced(x))\nforall x (Soulless(x) and Exocrine(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) -> Exocrine(x))\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) -> Soulless(x))\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) -> Taoist(x))\nforall x (Exocrine(x) -> Taoist(x))\nTaoist(gisela) -> Enforced(gisela)\nforall x (Soulless(x) and Exocrine(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\n\nTaoist(gisela)\n\nforall x (Exocrine(x) -> Taoist(x)) <- forall x (Enforced(x) -> Exocrine(x)) <- forall x (Soulless(x) -> Enforced(x)) <- forall x (Hobnailed(x) -> Soulless(x)) <- forall x (Soulless(x) and Exocrine(x) -> Hobnailed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Star is graduated. Endora is waxed. Heidie is roofless. If someone is roofless then they are gaping. If someone is roofless and graduated then they are compact. Nice people are graduated. If someone is compact then they are roofless. Red people are foldaway. If someone is graduated then they are foldaway. If Endora is foldaway then Endora is gaping. If someone is roofless and graduated then they are compact. Endora is not graduated.", "logic": "\nGraduated(star)\nWaxed(endora)\nRoofless(heidie)\nforall x (Roofless(x) -> Gaping(x))\nforall x (Roofless(x) and Graduated(x) -> Compact(x))\nforall x (Gaping(x) -> Graduated(x))\nforall x (Compact(x) -> Roofless(x))\nforall x (Compact(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Graduated(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nFoldaway(endora) -> Gaping(endora)\nforall x (Roofless(x) and Graduated(x) -> Compact(x))\n\nnot Graduated(endora)\n\nforall x (Gaping(x) -> Graduated(x)) <- forall x (Roofless(x) -> Gaping(x)) <- forall x (Compact(x) -> Roofless(x)) <- forall x (Roofless(x) and Graduated(x) -> Compact(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Cloe is corvine. Pammie is lxxvii. Ahmad is dolourous. If someone is dolourous then they are quondam. If someone is dolourous and corvine then they are edentulous. Nice people are corvine. If someone is edentulous then they are dolourous. Red people are returning. If someone is corvine then they are returning. If Pammie is returning then Pammie is quondam. If someone is dolourous and corvine then they are edentulous. Cloe is blue.", "logic": "\nCorvine(cloe)\nLxxvii(pammie)\nDolourous(ahmad)\nforall x (Dolourous(x) -> Quondam(x))\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Corvine(x) -> Edentulous(x))\nforall x (Quondam(x) -> Corvine(x))\nforall x (Edentulous(x) -> Dolourous(x))\nforall x (Edentulous(x) -> Returning(x))\nforall x (Corvine(x) -> Returning(x))\nReturning(pammie) -> Quondam(pammie)\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Corvine(x) -> Edentulous(x))\n\nBlue(cloe)\n\nBlue(cloe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Karin is rapid. Cosette is sunk. Ellis is unsuited. If someone is unsuited then they are beggarly. If someone is unsuited and rapid then they are hornlike. Nice people are rapid. If someone is hornlike then they are unsuited. Red people are subacute. If someone is rapid then they are subacute. If Cosette is subacute then Cosette is beggarly. If someone is unsuited and rapid then they are hornlike. Cosette is not blue.", "logic": "\nRapid(karin)\nSunk(cosette)\nUnsuited(ellis)\nforall x (Unsuited(x) -> Beggarly(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Rapid(x) -> Hornlike(x))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Rapid(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) -> Subacute(x))\nforall x (Rapid(x) -> Subacute(x))\nSubacute(cosette) -> Beggarly(cosette)\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Rapid(x) -> Hornlike(x))\n\nnot Blue(cosette)\n\nnot Blue(cosette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Leighton is antibiotic. Dyan is punishing. Sibylla is rattled. If someone is rattled then they are local. If someone is rattled and antibiotic then they are tuneless. Nice people are antibiotic. If someone is tuneless then they are rattled. Red people are skilful. If someone is antibiotic then they are skilful. If Dyan is skilful then Dyan is local. If someone is rattled and antibiotic then they are tuneless. Sibylla is punishing.", "logic": "\nAntibiotic(leighton)\nPunishing(dyan)\nRattled(sibylla)\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Local(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) and Antibiotic(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nforall x (Local(x) -> Antibiotic(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Rattled(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Skilful(x))\nforall x (Antibiotic(x) -> Skilful(x))\nSkilful(dyan) -> Local(dyan)\nforall x (Rattled(x) and Antibiotic(x) -> Tuneless(x))\n\nPunishing(sibylla)\n\nPunishing(sibylla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1528"} {"premises": "Guthry is coexistent. Rivi is auditory. Rivi is unholy. If Guthry is unholy then Guthry is warped. If someone is unholy then they are coexistent. Young people are unanimated. Rivi is auditory.", "logic": "\nCoexistent(guthry)\nAuditory(rivi)\nUnholy(rivi)\nUnholy(guthry) -> Warped(guthry)\nforall x (Unholy(x) -> Coexistent(x))\nforall x (Coexistent(x) -> Unanimated(x))\n\nAuditory(rivi)\n\ntherefore Auditory(rivi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Ken is iambic. Zachariah is rheumatoid. Zachariah is toothlike. If Ken is toothlike then Ken is fraternal. If someone is toothlike then they are iambic. Young people are northeast. Ken is not iambic.", "logic": "\nIambic(ken)\nRheumatoid(zachariah)\nToothlike(zachariah)\nToothlike(ken) -> Fraternal(ken)\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Iambic(x))\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Northeast(x))\n\nnot Iambic(ken)\n\ntherefore Iambic(ken)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Karil is bipolar. Griffin is impromptu. Griffin is hypethral. If Karil is hypethral then Karil is undraped. If someone is hypethral then they are bipolar. Young people are external. Karil is external.", "logic": "\nBipolar(karil)\nImpromptu(griffin)\nHypethral(griffin)\nHypethral(karil) -> Undraped(karil)\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> Bipolar(x))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) -> External(x))\n\nExternal(karil)\n\nBipolar(karil) and forall x (Bipolar(x) -> External(x)) -> therefore External(karil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Hanni is sedate. Xerxes is stylish. Xerxes is myocardial. If Hanni is myocardial then Hanni is owing. If someone is myocardial then they are sedate. Young people are lubberly. Xerxes is not sedate.", "logic": "\nSedate(hanni)\nStylish(xerxes)\nMyocardial(xerxes)\nMyocardial(hanni) -> Owing(hanni)\nforall x (Myocardial(x) -> Sedate(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) -> Lubberly(x))\n\nnot Sedate(xerxes)\n\nMyocardial(xerxes) and forall x (Myocardial(x) -> Sedate(x)) -> therefore Sedate(xerxes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Prasun is foldable. Georgetta is struggling. Georgetta is inimical. If Prasun is inimical then Prasun is valved. If someone is inimical then they are foldable. Young people are panicled. Georgetta is panicled.", "logic": "\nFoldable(prasun)\nStruggling(georgetta)\nInimical(georgetta)\nInimical(prasun) -> Valved(prasun)\nforall x (Inimical(x) -> Foldable(x))\nforall x (Foldable(x) -> Panicled(x))\n\nPanicled(georgetta)\n\nInimical(georgetta) and forall x (Inimical(x) -> Foldable(x)) -> therefore Foldable(georgetta) Foldable(georgetta) and forall x (Foldable(x) -> Panicled(x)) -> therefore Panicled(georgetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Rafaelia is aboveboard. Tiffanie is perverse. Tiffanie is beltless. If Rafaelia is beltless then Rafaelia is cross. If someone is beltless then they are aboveboard. Young people are diffusing. Tiffanie is not diffusing.", "logic": "\nAboveboard(rafaelia)\nPerverse(tiffanie)\nBeltless(tiffanie)\nBeltless(rafaelia) -> Cross(rafaelia)\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Diffusing(x))\n\nnot Diffusing(tiffanie)\n\nBeltless(tiffanie) and forall x (Beltless(x) -> Aboveboard(x)) -> therefore Aboveboard(tiffanie) Aboveboard(tiffanie) and forall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Diffusing(x)) -> therefore Diffusing(tiffanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Griswold is aquiferous. Anetta is cereal. Anetta is aerated. If Griswold is aerated then Griswold is monthlong. If someone is aerated then they are aquiferous. Young people are each. Griswold is not monthlong.", "logic": "\nAquiferous(griswold)\nCereal(anetta)\nAerated(anetta)\nAerated(griswold) -> Monthlong(griswold)\nforall x (Aerated(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Each(x))\n\nnot Monthlong(griswold)\n\nAerated(griswold) -> Monthlong(griswold) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Blare is muhammadan. Wilburn is whiny. Wilburn is acquired. If Blare is acquired then Blare is talismanic. If someone is acquired then they are muhammadan. Young people are stupendous. Wilburn is talismanic.", "logic": "\nMuhammadan(blare)\nWhiny(wilburn)\nAcquired(wilburn)\nAcquired(blare) -> Talismanic(blare)\nforall x (Acquired(x) -> Muhammadan(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Stupendous(x))\n\nTalismanic(wilburn)\n\nTalismanic(wilburn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Gayleen is diarrhoeal. Tyson is hairless. Tyson is impromptu. If Gayleen is impromptu then Gayleen is placoid. If someone is impromptu then they are diarrhoeal. Young people are rampant. Tyson is not quiet.", "logic": "\nDiarrhoeal(gayleen)\nHairless(tyson)\nImpromptu(tyson)\nImpromptu(gayleen) -> Placoid(gayleen)\nforall x (Impromptu(x) -> Diarrhoeal(x))\nforall x (Diarrhoeal(x) -> Rampant(x))\n\nnot Quiet(tyson)\n\nnot Quiet(tyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Nertie is apodeictic. Cheston is rhymeless. Cheston is grassless. If Nertie is grassless then Nertie is lxxi. If someone is grassless then they are apodeictic. Young people are incendiary. Nertie is quiet.", "logic": "\nApodeictic(nertie)\nRhymeless(cheston)\nGrassless(cheston)\nGrassless(nertie) -> Lxxi(nertie)\nforall x (Grassless(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Incendiary(x))\n\nQuiet(nertie)\n\nQuiet(nertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Ibbie is ranking. Shadow is leathered. Shadow is sectioned. If Ibbie is sectioned then Ibbie is dutiful. If someone is sectioned then they are ranking. Young people are squatty. Shadow is not kind.", "logic": "\nRanking(ibbie)\nLeathered(shadow)\nSectioned(shadow)\nSectioned(ibbie) -> Dutiful(ibbie)\nforall x (Sectioned(x) -> Ranking(x))\nforall x (Ranking(x) -> Squatty(x))\n\nnot Kind(shadow)\n\nnot Kind(shadow) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Trixie is unchewable. Leesa is flippant. Leesa is pensive. If Trixie is pensive then Trixie is anionic. If someone is pensive then they are unchewable. Young people are chiliastic. Trixie is pensive.", "logic": "\nUnchewable(trixie)\nFlippant(leesa)\nPensive(leesa)\nPensive(trixie) -> Anionic(trixie)\nforall x (Pensive(x) -> Unchewable(x))\nforall x (Unchewable(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\n\nPensive(trixie)\n\nPensive(trixie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-940"} {"premises": "Britte is nucleated. Britte is slapdash. Britte is efferent. Britte is pockmarked. Jeanna is slapdash. Lena is efferent. Peta is profuse. Peta is magnetized. Peta is rimmed. Peta is efferent. All nucleated, slapdash things are rimmed. All rimmed, nucleated things are magnetized. If Jeanna is efferent then Jeanna is magnetized. All magnetized, nucleated things are slapdash. If something is efferent and nucleated then it is slapdash. If something is pockmarked then it is nucleated. If something is rimmed and efferent then it is magnetized. If something is profuse then it is rimmed. Peta is rimmed.", "logic": "\nNucleated(britte)\nSlapdash(britte)\nEfferent(britte)\nPockmarked(britte)\nSlapdash(jeanna)\nEfferent(lena)\nProfuse(peta)\nMagnetized(peta)\nRimmed(peta)\nEfferent(peta)\nforall x (Nucleated(x) and Slapdash(x) -> Rimmed(x))\nforall x (Rimmed(x) and Nucleated(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nEfferent(jeanna) -> Magnetized(jeanna)\nforall x (Magnetized(x) and Nucleated(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Efferent(x) and Nucleated(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) -> Nucleated(x))\nforall x (Rimmed(x) and Efferent(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Rimmed(x))\n\nRimmed(peta)\n\ntherefore Rimmed(peta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Tabor is visionary. Tabor is positional. Tabor is such. Tabor is soluble. Darsey is positional. Hellene is such. Winton is torpid. Winton is roughshod. Winton is direct. Winton is such. All visionary, positional things are direct. All direct, visionary things are roughshod. If Darsey is such then Darsey is roughshod. All roughshod, visionary things are positional. If something is such and visionary then it is positional. If something is soluble then it is visionary. If something is direct and such then it is roughshod. If something is torpid then it is direct. Winton is not direct.", "logic": "\nVisionary(tabor)\nPositional(tabor)\nSuch(tabor)\nSoluble(tabor)\nPositional(darsey)\nSuch(hellene)\nTorpid(winton)\nRoughshod(winton)\nDirect(winton)\nSuch(winton)\nforall x (Visionary(x) and Positional(x) -> Direct(x))\nforall x (Direct(x) and Visionary(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nSuch(darsey) -> Roughshod(darsey)\nforall x (Roughshod(x) and Visionary(x) -> Positional(x))\nforall x (Such(x) and Visionary(x) -> Positional(x))\nforall x (Soluble(x) -> Visionary(x))\nforall x (Direct(x) and Such(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Direct(x))\n\nnot Direct(winton)\n\ntherefore Direct(winton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Rosene is inclined. Rosene is hagridden. Rosene is fouled. Rosene is sunbaked. Jammie is hagridden. Gertrudis is fouled. Wright is peccant. Wright is wiccan. Wright is crisp. Wright is fouled. All inclined, hagridden things are crisp. All crisp, inclined things are wiccan. If Jammie is fouled then Jammie is wiccan. All wiccan, inclined things are hagridden. If something is fouled and inclined then it is hagridden. If something is sunbaked then it is inclined. If something is crisp and fouled then it is wiccan. If something is peccant then it is crisp. Rosene is crisp.", "logic": "\nInclined(rosene)\nHagridden(rosene)\nFouled(rosene)\nSunbaked(rosene)\nHagridden(jammie)\nFouled(gertrudis)\nPeccant(wright)\nWiccan(wright)\nCrisp(wright)\nFouled(wright)\nforall x (Inclined(x) and Hagridden(x) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) and Inclined(x) -> Wiccan(x))\nFouled(jammie) -> Wiccan(jammie)\nforall x (Wiccan(x) and Inclined(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) and Inclined(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Inclined(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) and Fouled(x) -> Wiccan(x))\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Crisp(x))\n\nCrisp(rosene)\n\nInclined(rosene) and Hagridden(rosene) and forall x (Inclined(x) and Hagridden(x) -> Crisp(x)) -> therefore Crisp(rosene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Bentley is medullary. Bentley is platelike. Bentley is xenophobic. Bentley is baptismal. Nettie is platelike. Jacquetta is xenophobic. Johnathan is bohemian. Johnathan is hunched. Johnathan is whatsoever. Johnathan is xenophobic. All medullary, platelike things are whatsoever. All whatsoever, medullary things are hunched. If Nettie is xenophobic then Nettie is hunched. All hunched, medullary things are platelike. If something is xenophobic and medullary then it is platelike. If something is baptismal then it is medullary. If something is whatsoever and xenophobic then it is hunched. If something is bohemian then it is whatsoever. Bentley is not whatsoever.", "logic": "\nMedullary(bentley)\nPlatelike(bentley)\nXenophobic(bentley)\nBaptismal(bentley)\nPlatelike(nettie)\nXenophobic(jacquetta)\nBohemian(johnathan)\nHunched(johnathan)\nWhatsoever(johnathan)\nXenophobic(johnathan)\nforall x (Medullary(x) and Platelike(x) -> Whatsoever(x))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) and Medullary(x) -> Hunched(x))\nXenophobic(nettie) -> Hunched(nettie)\nforall x (Hunched(x) and Medullary(x) -> Platelike(x))\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and Medullary(x) -> Platelike(x))\nforall x (Baptismal(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) and Xenophobic(x) -> Hunched(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) -> Whatsoever(x))\n\nnot Whatsoever(bentley)\n\nMedullary(bentley) and Platelike(bentley) and forall x (Medullary(x) and Platelike(x) -> Whatsoever(x)) -> therefore Whatsoever(bentley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Byram is dual. Byram is earthen. Byram is pierced. Byram is accurate. Robinetta is earthen. Thomasine is pierced. Binnie is unceasing. Binnie is topologic. Binnie is kokka. Binnie is pierced. All dual, earthen things are kokka. All kokka, dual things are topologic. If Robinetta is pierced then Robinetta is topologic. All topologic, dual things are earthen. If something is pierced and dual then it is earthen. If something is accurate then it is dual. If something is kokka and pierced then it is topologic. If something is unceasing then it is kokka. Byram is topologic.", "logic": "\nDual(byram)\nEarthen(byram)\nPierced(byram)\nAccurate(byram)\nEarthen(robinetta)\nPierced(thomasine)\nUnceasing(binnie)\nTopologic(binnie)\nKokka(binnie)\nPierced(binnie)\nforall x (Dual(x) and Earthen(x) -> Kokka(x))\nforall x (Kokka(x) and Dual(x) -> Topologic(x))\nPierced(robinetta) -> Topologic(robinetta)\nforall x (Topologic(x) and Dual(x) -> Earthen(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) and Dual(x) -> Earthen(x))\nforall x (Accurate(x) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Kokka(x) and Pierced(x) -> Topologic(x))\nforall x (Unceasing(x) -> Kokka(x))\n\nTopologic(byram)\n\nDual(byram) and Earthen(byram) and forall x (Dual(x) and Earthen(x) -> Kokka(x)) -> therefore Kokka(byram) Kokka(byram) and Dual(byram) and forall x (Kokka(x) and Dual(x) -> Topologic(x)) -> therefore Topologic(byram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Dickey is rectified. Dickey is semirigid. Dickey is fogged. Dickey is methodical. Ralph is semirigid. Eba is fogged. Maison is dissimilar. Maison is oscine. Maison is bigeneric. Maison is fogged. All rectified, semirigid things are bigeneric. All bigeneric, rectified things are oscine. If Ralph is fogged then Ralph is oscine. All oscine, rectified things are semirigid. If something is fogged and rectified then it is semirigid. If something is methodical then it is rectified. If something is bigeneric and fogged then it is oscine. If something is dissimilar then it is bigeneric. Dickey is not oscine.", "logic": "\nRectified(dickey)\nSemirigid(dickey)\nFogged(dickey)\nMethodical(dickey)\nSemirigid(ralph)\nFogged(eba)\nDissimilar(maison)\nOscine(maison)\nBigeneric(maison)\nFogged(maison)\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Rectified(x) -> Oscine(x))\nFogged(ralph) -> Oscine(ralph)\nforall x (Oscine(x) and Rectified(x) -> Semirigid(x))\nforall x (Fogged(x) and Rectified(x) -> Semirigid(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Rectified(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Fogged(x) -> Oscine(x))\nforall x (Dissimilar(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\n\nnot Oscine(dickey)\n\nRectified(dickey) and Semirigid(dickey) and forall x (Rectified(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Bigeneric(x)) -> therefore Bigeneric(dickey) Bigeneric(dickey) and Rectified(dickey) and forall x (Bigeneric(x) and Rectified(x) -> Oscine(x)) -> therefore Oscine(dickey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Isabella is idealized. Isabella is potbellied. Isabella is texan. Isabella is medicative. Octavius is potbellied. Virginie is texan. Natalya is adjusted. Natalya is catatonic. Natalya is unopen. Natalya is texan. All idealized, potbellied things are unopen. All unopen, idealized things are catatonic. If Octavius is texan then Octavius is catatonic. All catatonic, idealized things are potbellied. If something is texan and idealized then it is potbellied. If something is medicative then it is idealized. If something is unopen and texan then it is catatonic. If something is adjusted then it is unopen. Natalya is not potbellied.", "logic": "\nIdealized(isabella)\nPotbellied(isabella)\nTexan(isabella)\nMedicative(isabella)\nPotbellied(octavius)\nTexan(virginie)\nAdjusted(natalya)\nCatatonic(natalya)\nUnopen(natalya)\nTexan(natalya)\nforall x (Idealized(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Unopen(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) and Idealized(x) -> Catatonic(x))\nTexan(octavius) -> Catatonic(octavius)\nforall x (Catatonic(x) and Idealized(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Texan(x) and Idealized(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Medicative(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) and Texan(x) -> Catatonic(x))\nforall x (Adjusted(x) -> Unopen(x))\n\nnot Potbellied(natalya)\n\nforall x (Catatonic(x) and Idealized(x) -> Potbellied(x)) <- forall x (Medicative(x) -> Idealized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Dina is pious. Dina is speckled. Dina is faddy. Dina is suppliant. Reynolds is speckled. Hatti is faddy. Sharon is capitalist. Sharon is dirt. Sharon is waspish. Sharon is faddy. All pious, speckled things are waspish. All waspish, pious things are dirt. If Reynolds is faddy then Reynolds is dirt. All dirt, pious things are speckled. If something is faddy and pious then it is speckled. If something is suppliant then it is pious. If something is waspish and faddy then it is dirt. If something is capitalist then it is waspish. Reynolds is pious.", "logic": "\nPious(dina)\nSpeckled(dina)\nFaddy(dina)\nSuppliant(dina)\nSpeckled(reynolds)\nFaddy(hatti)\nCapitalist(sharon)\nDirt(sharon)\nWaspish(sharon)\nFaddy(sharon)\nforall x (Pious(x) and Speckled(x) -> Waspish(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) and Pious(x) -> Dirt(x))\nFaddy(reynolds) -> Dirt(reynolds)\nforall x (Dirt(x) and Pious(x) -> Speckled(x))\nforall x (Faddy(x) and Pious(x) -> Speckled(x))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Pious(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) and Faddy(x) -> Dirt(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Waspish(x))\n\nPious(reynolds)\n\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Pious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Karlene is offstage. Karlene is roughened. Karlene is seagoing. Karlene is select. Antoni is roughened. Bathsheba is seagoing. Garey is supine. Garey is cubistic. Garey is mined. Garey is seagoing. All offstage, roughened things are mined. All mined, offstage things are cubistic. If Antoni is seagoing then Antoni is cubistic. All cubistic, offstage things are roughened. If something is seagoing and offstage then it is roughened. If something is select then it is offstage. If something is mined and seagoing then it is cubistic. If something is supine then it is mined. Bathsheba is not roughened.", "logic": "\nOffstage(karlene)\nRoughened(karlene)\nSeagoing(karlene)\nSelect(karlene)\nRoughened(antoni)\nSeagoing(bathsheba)\nSupine(garey)\nCubistic(garey)\nMined(garey)\nSeagoing(garey)\nforall x (Offstage(x) and Roughened(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) and Offstage(x) -> Cubistic(x))\nSeagoing(antoni) -> Cubistic(antoni)\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Offstage(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Seagoing(x) and Offstage(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Select(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) and Seagoing(x) -> Cubistic(x))\nforall x (Supine(x) -> Mined(x))\n\nnot Roughened(bathsheba)\n\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Offstage(x) -> Roughened(x)) <- forall x (Select(x) -> Offstage(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Georgena is baseless. Georgena is asteroidal. Georgena is foster. Georgena is cellular. Sidonnie is asteroidal. Linet is foster. Jarvis is yeasty. Jarvis is practical. Jarvis is unlaced. Jarvis is foster. All baseless, asteroidal things are unlaced. All unlaced, baseless things are practical. If Sidonnie is foster then Sidonnie is practical. All practical, baseless things are asteroidal. If something is foster and baseless then it is asteroidal. If something is cellular then it is baseless. If something is unlaced and foster then it is practical. If something is yeasty then it is unlaced. Georgena is yeasty.", "logic": "\nBaseless(georgena)\nAsteroidal(georgena)\nFoster(georgena)\nCellular(georgena)\nAsteroidal(sidonnie)\nFoster(linet)\nYeasty(jarvis)\nPractical(jarvis)\nUnlaced(jarvis)\nFoster(jarvis)\nforall x (Baseless(x) and Asteroidal(x) -> Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Unlaced(x) and Baseless(x) -> Practical(x))\nFoster(sidonnie) -> Practical(sidonnie)\nforall x (Practical(x) and Baseless(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) and Baseless(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Cellular(x) -> Baseless(x))\nforall x (Unlaced(x) and Foster(x) -> Practical(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Unlaced(x))\n\nYeasty(georgena)\n\nYeasty(georgena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Gelya is haired. Gelya is fingerless. Gelya is topnotch. Gelya is oldline. Madella is fingerless. Timotheus is topnotch. Ruperto is zambian. Ruperto is culpable. Ruperto is timed. Ruperto is topnotch. All haired, fingerless things are timed. All timed, haired things are culpable. If Madella is topnotch then Madella is culpable. All culpable, haired things are fingerless. If something is topnotch and haired then it is fingerless. If something is oldline then it is haired. If something is timed and topnotch then it is culpable. If something is zambian then it is timed. Timotheus is not zambian.", "logic": "\nHaired(gelya)\nFingerless(gelya)\nTopnotch(gelya)\nOldline(gelya)\nFingerless(madella)\nTopnotch(timotheus)\nZambian(ruperto)\nCulpable(ruperto)\nTimed(ruperto)\nTopnotch(ruperto)\nforall x (Haired(x) and Fingerless(x) -> Timed(x))\nforall x (Timed(x) and Haired(x) -> Culpable(x))\nTopnotch(madella) -> Culpable(madella)\nforall x (Culpable(x) and Haired(x) -> Fingerless(x))\nforall x (Topnotch(x) and Haired(x) -> Fingerless(x))\nforall x (Oldline(x) -> Haired(x))\nforall x (Timed(x) and Topnotch(x) -> Culpable(x))\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Timed(x))\n\nnot Zambian(timotheus)\n\nnot Zambian(timotheus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Genni is eastmost. Genni is copular. Genni is virile. Genni is gummed. Estele is copular. Carolina is virile. Florry is ossiculate. Florry is broadside. Florry is prepared. Florry is virile. All eastmost, copular things are prepared. All prepared, eastmost things are broadside. If Estele is virile then Estele is broadside. All broadside, eastmost things are copular. If something is virile and eastmost then it is copular. If something is gummed then it is eastmost. If something is prepared and virile then it is broadside. If something is ossiculate then it is prepared. Estele is ossiculate.", "logic": "\nEastmost(genni)\nCopular(genni)\nVirile(genni)\nGummed(genni)\nCopular(estele)\nVirile(carolina)\nOssiculate(florry)\nBroadside(florry)\nPrepared(florry)\nVirile(florry)\nforall x (Eastmost(x) and Copular(x) -> Prepared(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) and Eastmost(x) -> Broadside(x))\nVirile(estele) -> Broadside(estele)\nforall x (Broadside(x) and Eastmost(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Virile(x) and Eastmost(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Eastmost(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) and Virile(x) -> Broadside(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Prepared(x))\n\nOssiculate(estele)\n\nOssiculate(estele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-554"} {"premises": "Salem is undesired. Salem is corrigible. Salem is sissyish. Timi is undesired. Timi is exogenous. Timi is lipotropic. Timi is saccadic. If Timi is sissyish then Timi is tangerine. If something is saccadic then it is sissyish. Salem is sissyish.", "logic": "\nUndesired(salem)\nCorrigible(salem)\nSissyish(salem)\nUndesired(timi)\nExogenous(timi)\nLipotropic(timi)\nSaccadic(timi)\nSissyish(timi) -> Tangerine(timi)\nforall x (Saccadic(x) -> Sissyish(x))\n\nSissyish(salem)\n\ntherefore Sissyish(salem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Filmore is ministrant. Filmore is rotary. Filmore is briefless. Fraser is ministrant. Fraser is ethnologic. Fraser is upscale. Fraser is compulsory. If Fraser is briefless then Fraser is right. If something is compulsory then it is briefless. Filmore is not rotary.", "logic": "\nMinistrant(filmore)\nRotary(filmore)\nBriefless(filmore)\nMinistrant(fraser)\nEthnologic(fraser)\nUpscale(fraser)\nCompulsory(fraser)\nBriefless(fraser) -> Right(fraser)\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Briefless(x))\n\nnot Rotary(filmore)\n\ntherefore Rotary(filmore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Roseline is hemophilic. Roseline is untimely. Roseline is resinous. Selene is hemophilic. Selene is decorative. Selene is botanic. Selene is arching. If Selene is resinous then Selene is mechanical. If something is arching then it is resinous. Selene is resinous.", "logic": "\nHemophilic(roseline)\nUntimely(roseline)\nResinous(roseline)\nHemophilic(selene)\nDecorative(selene)\nBotanic(selene)\nArching(selene)\nResinous(selene) -> Mechanical(selene)\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Resinous(x))\n\nResinous(selene)\n\nArching(selene) and forall x (Arching(x) -> Resinous(x)) -> therefore Resinous(selene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Anjanette is parochial. Anjanette is scraggy. Anjanette is unrevised. Margurite is parochial. Margurite is delphian. Margurite is unexpired. Margurite is sylvan. If Margurite is unrevised then Margurite is judaic. If something is sylvan then it is unrevised. Margurite is not unrevised.", "logic": "\nParochial(anjanette)\nScraggy(anjanette)\nUnrevised(anjanette)\nParochial(margurite)\nDelphian(margurite)\nUnexpired(margurite)\nSylvan(margurite)\nUnrevised(margurite) -> Judaic(margurite)\nforall x (Sylvan(x) -> Unrevised(x))\n\nnot Unrevised(margurite)\n\nSylvan(margurite) and forall x (Sylvan(x) -> Unrevised(x)) -> therefore Unrevised(margurite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Danielle is coltish. Danielle is ultra. Danielle is awol. Lauree is coltish. Lauree is oiled. Lauree is unbeloved. Lauree is denary. If Lauree is awol then Lauree is mystical. If something is denary then it is awol. Lauree is mystical.", "logic": "\nColtish(danielle)\nUltra(danielle)\nAwol(danielle)\nColtish(lauree)\nOiled(lauree)\nUnbeloved(lauree)\nDenary(lauree)\nAwol(lauree) -> Mystical(lauree)\nforall x (Denary(x) -> Awol(x))\n\nMystical(lauree)\n\nDenary(lauree) and forall x (Denary(x) -> Awol(x)) -> therefore Awol(lauree) Awol(lauree) and Awol(lauree) -> Mystical(lauree) -> therefore Mystical(lauree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Mickie is involute. Mickie is voltarean. Mickie is unalert. Feliza is involute. Feliza is maximal. Feliza is unuseable. Feliza is juristic. If Feliza is unalert then Feliza is favourable. If something is juristic then it is unalert. Feliza is not favourable.", "logic": "\nInvolute(mickie)\nVoltarean(mickie)\nUnalert(mickie)\nInvolute(feliza)\nMaximal(feliza)\nUnuseable(feliza)\nJuristic(feliza)\nUnalert(feliza) -> Favourable(feliza)\nforall x (Juristic(x) -> Unalert(x))\n\nnot Favourable(feliza)\n\nJuristic(feliza) and forall x (Juristic(x) -> Unalert(x)) -> therefore Unalert(feliza) Unalert(feliza) and Unalert(feliza) -> Favourable(feliza) -> therefore Favourable(feliza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Patrik is toed. Patrik is stubbly. Patrik is muted. Maddi is toed. Maddi is sold. Maddi is functional. Maddi is lengthened. If Maddi is muted then Maddi is ignescent. If something is lengthened then it is muted. Patrik is not functional.", "logic": "\nToed(patrik)\nStubbly(patrik)\nMuted(patrik)\nToed(maddi)\nSold(maddi)\nFunctional(maddi)\nLengthened(maddi)\nMuted(maddi) -> Ignescent(maddi)\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Muted(x))\n\nnot Functional(patrik)\n\nnot Functional(patrik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Jolene is sordid. Jolene is bracteate. Jolene is clever. Quiggly is sordid. Quiggly is perishable. Quiggly is opportune. Quiggly is diffusing. If Quiggly is clever then Quiggly is scummy. If something is diffusing then it is clever. Jolene is perishable.", "logic": "\nSordid(jolene)\nBracteate(jolene)\nClever(jolene)\nSordid(quiggly)\nPerishable(quiggly)\nOpportune(quiggly)\nDiffusing(quiggly)\nClever(quiggly) -> Scummy(quiggly)\nforall x (Diffusing(x) -> Clever(x))\n\nPerishable(jolene)\n\nPerishable(jolene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Suzan is chockful. Suzan is peregrine. Suzan is upcountry. Lauretta is chockful. Lauretta is formalized. Lauretta is sublingual. Lauretta is unwieldy. If Lauretta is upcountry then Lauretta is expansile. If something is unwieldy then it is upcountry. Suzan is not unwieldy.", "logic": "\nChockful(suzan)\nPeregrine(suzan)\nUpcountry(suzan)\nChockful(lauretta)\nFormalized(lauretta)\nSublingual(lauretta)\nUnwieldy(lauretta)\nUpcountry(lauretta) -> Expansile(lauretta)\nforall x (Unwieldy(x) -> Upcountry(x))\n\nnot Unwieldy(suzan)\n\nnot Unwieldy(suzan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "Claudio is unlikable. Claudio is mislaid. Claudio is abused. Raj is unlikable. Raj is metastable. Raj is squishy. Raj is harrowing. If Raj is abused then Raj is sixfold. If something is harrowing then it is abused. Raj is mislaid.", "logic": "\nUnlikable(claudio)\nMislaid(claudio)\nAbused(claudio)\nUnlikable(raj)\nMetastable(raj)\nSquishy(raj)\nHarrowing(raj)\nAbused(raj) -> Sixfold(raj)\nforall x (Harrowing(x) -> Abused(x))\n\nMislaid(raj)\n\nMislaid(raj) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2091"} {"premises": "The maris blackguard the atlanta. The maris delve the atlanta. The logan does not chase the atlanta. The logan is unframed. The logan does not visit the maris. The logan delve the atlanta. The atlanta does not chase the maris. The atlanta is not unframed. The atlanta is frizzly. The atlanta is prewar. The atlanta blackguard the maris. The atlanta delve the hagan. The hagan mark the maris. The hagan does not chase the logan. The hagan blackguard the maris. The hagan blackguard the logan. If someone mark the logan then they chase the hagan. If someone blackguard the atlanta and they do not visit the hagan then they chase the hagan. If the logan is fraught then the logan mark the maris. If the hagan blackguard the maris and the hagan does not chase the logan then the hagan blackguard the logan. If someone delve the hagan and they visit the atlanta then they chase the atlanta. If someone delve the hagan then the hagan is frizzly. If someone delve the hagan then they see the logan. If someone blackguard the logan then they visit the atlanta. The atlanta delve the hagan.", "logic": "\nBlackguard(maris, atlanta)\nDelve(maris, atlanta)\nnot Mark(logan, atlanta)\nUnframed(logan)\nnot Delve(logan, maris)\nDelve(logan, atlanta)\nnot Mark(atlanta, maris)\nnot Unframed(atlanta)\nFrizzly(atlanta)\nPrewar(atlanta)\nBlackguard(atlanta, maris)\nDelve(atlanta, hagan)\nMark(hagan, maris)\nnot Mark(hagan, logan)\nBlackguard(hagan, maris)\nBlackguard(hagan, logan)\nforall x (Mark(x, logan) -> Mark(x, hagan))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, atlanta) and not Delve(x, hagan) -> Mark(x, hagan))\nFraught(logan) -> Mark(logan, maris)\nBlackguard(hagan, maris) and not Mark(hagan, logan) -> Blackguard(hagan, logan)\nforall x (Delve(x, hagan) and Delve(x, atlanta) -> Mark(x, atlanta))\nforall x (Delve(x, hagan) -> Frizzly(hagan))\nforall x (Delve(x, hagan) -> Blackguard(x, logan))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, logan) -> Delve(x, atlanta))\n\nDelve(atlanta, hagan)\n\ntherefore Delve(atlanta, hagan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The bettye expedite the ursola. The bettye highlight the ursola. The maya does not chase the ursola. The maya is hateful. The maya does not visit the bettye. The maya highlight the ursola. The ursola does not chase the bettye. The ursola is not hateful. The ursola is well. The ursola is hectic. The ursola expedite the bettye. The ursola highlight the carmina. The carmina revisit the bettye. The carmina does not chase the maya. The carmina expedite the bettye. The carmina expedite the maya. If someone revisit the maya then they chase the carmina. If someone expedite the ursola and they do not visit the carmina then they chase the carmina. If the maya is agonal then the maya revisit the bettye. If the carmina expedite the bettye and the carmina does not chase the maya then the carmina expedite the maya. If someone highlight the carmina and they visit the ursola then they chase the ursola. If someone highlight the carmina then the carmina is well. If someone highlight the carmina then they see the maya. If someone expedite the maya then they visit the ursola. The bettye does not visit the ursola.", "logic": "\nExpedite(bettye, ursola)\nHighlight(bettye, ursola)\nnot Revisit(maya, ursola)\nHateful(maya)\nnot Highlight(maya, bettye)\nHighlight(maya, ursola)\nnot Revisit(ursola, bettye)\nnot Hateful(ursola)\nWell(ursola)\nHectic(ursola)\nExpedite(ursola, bettye)\nHighlight(ursola, carmina)\nRevisit(carmina, bettye)\nnot Revisit(carmina, maya)\nExpedite(carmina, bettye)\nExpedite(carmina, maya)\nforall x (Revisit(x, maya) -> Revisit(x, carmina))\nforall x (Expedite(x, ursola) and not Highlight(x, carmina) -> Revisit(x, carmina))\nAgonal(maya) -> Revisit(maya, bettye)\nExpedite(carmina, bettye) and not Revisit(carmina, maya) -> Expedite(carmina, maya)\nforall x (Highlight(x, carmina) and Highlight(x, ursola) -> Revisit(x, ursola))\nforall x (Highlight(x, carmina) -> Well(carmina))\nforall x (Highlight(x, carmina) -> Expedite(x, maya))\nforall x (Expedite(x, maya) -> Highlight(x, ursola))\n\nnot Highlight(bettye, ursola)\n\ntherefore Highlight(bettye, ursola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The maxy outrange the julissa. The maxy train the julissa. The ninetta does not chase the julissa. The ninetta is agreeable. The ninetta does not visit the maxy. The ninetta train the julissa. The julissa does not chase the maxy. The julissa is not agreeable. The julissa is abroach. The julissa is unmindful. The julissa outrange the maxy. The julissa train the zarah. The zarah velcro the maxy. The zarah does not chase the ninetta. The zarah outrange the maxy. The zarah outrange the ninetta. If someone velcro the ninetta then they chase the zarah. If someone outrange the julissa and they do not visit the zarah then they chase the zarah. If the ninetta is listed then the ninetta velcro the maxy. If the zarah outrange the maxy and the zarah does not chase the ninetta then the zarah outrange the ninetta. If someone train the zarah and they visit the julissa then they chase the julissa. If someone train the zarah then the zarah is abroach. If someone train the zarah then they see the ninetta. If someone outrange the ninetta then they visit the julissa. The zarah train the julissa.", "logic": "\nOutrange(maxy, julissa)\nTrain(maxy, julissa)\nnot Velcro(ninetta, julissa)\nAgreeable(ninetta)\nnot Train(ninetta, maxy)\nTrain(ninetta, julissa)\nnot Velcro(julissa, maxy)\nnot Agreeable(julissa)\nAbroach(julissa)\nUnmindful(julissa)\nOutrange(julissa, maxy)\nTrain(julissa, zarah)\nVelcro(zarah, maxy)\nnot Velcro(zarah, ninetta)\nOutrange(zarah, maxy)\nOutrange(zarah, ninetta)\nforall x (Velcro(x, ninetta) -> Velcro(x, zarah))\nforall x (Outrange(x, julissa) and not Train(x, zarah) -> Velcro(x, zarah))\nListed(ninetta) -> Velcro(ninetta, maxy)\nOutrange(zarah, maxy) and not Velcro(zarah, ninetta) -> Outrange(zarah, ninetta)\nforall x (Train(x, zarah) and Train(x, julissa) -> Velcro(x, julissa))\nforall x (Train(x, zarah) -> Abroach(zarah))\nforall x (Train(x, zarah) -> Outrange(x, ninetta))\nforall x (Outrange(x, ninetta) -> Train(x, julissa))\n\nTrain(zarah, julissa)\n\nOutrange(zarah, ninetta) and forall x (Outrange(x, ninetta) -> Train(x, julissa)) -> therefore Train(zarah, julissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The doralia tack the aloysia. The doralia vanquish the aloysia. The yolande does not chase the aloysia. The yolande is burned. The yolande does not visit the doralia. The yolande vanquish the aloysia. The aloysia does not chase the doralia. The aloysia is not burned. The aloysia is concerned. The aloysia is surging. The aloysia tack the doralia. The aloysia vanquish the nil. The nil filch the doralia. The nil does not chase the yolande. The nil tack the doralia. The nil tack the yolande. If someone filch the yolande then they chase the nil. If someone tack the aloysia and they do not visit the nil then they chase the nil. If the yolande is breathing then the yolande filch the doralia. If the nil tack the doralia and the nil does not chase the yolande then the nil tack the yolande. If someone vanquish the nil and they visit the aloysia then they chase the aloysia. If someone vanquish the nil then the nil is concerned. If someone vanquish the nil then they see the yolande. If someone tack the yolande then they visit the aloysia. The nil does not visit the aloysia.", "logic": "\nTack(doralia, aloysia)\nVanquish(doralia, aloysia)\nnot Filch(yolande, aloysia)\nBurned(yolande)\nnot Vanquish(yolande, doralia)\nVanquish(yolande, aloysia)\nnot Filch(aloysia, doralia)\nnot Burned(aloysia)\nConcerned(aloysia)\nSurging(aloysia)\nTack(aloysia, doralia)\nVanquish(aloysia, nil)\nFilch(nil, doralia)\nnot Filch(nil, yolande)\nTack(nil, doralia)\nTack(nil, yolande)\nforall x (Filch(x, yolande) -> Filch(x, nil))\nforall x (Tack(x, aloysia) and not Vanquish(x, nil) -> Filch(x, nil))\nBreathing(yolande) -> Filch(yolande, doralia)\nTack(nil, doralia) and not Filch(nil, yolande) -> Tack(nil, yolande)\nforall x (Vanquish(x, nil) and Vanquish(x, aloysia) -> Filch(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Vanquish(x, nil) -> Concerned(nil))\nforall x (Vanquish(x, nil) -> Tack(x, yolande))\nforall x (Tack(x, yolande) -> Vanquish(x, aloysia))\n\nnot Vanquish(nil, aloysia)\n\nTack(nil, yolande) and forall x (Tack(x, yolande) -> Vanquish(x, aloysia)) -> therefore Vanquish(nil, aloysia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The spike astonish the griselda. The spike practice the griselda. The eustacia does not chase the griselda. The eustacia is windward. The eustacia does not visit the spike. The eustacia practice the griselda. The griselda does not chase the spike. The griselda is not windward. The griselda is vestmented. The griselda is unfrosted. The griselda astonish the spike. The griselda practice the marje. The marje divorce the spike. The marje does not chase the eustacia. The marje astonish the spike. The marje astonish the eustacia. If someone divorce the eustacia then they chase the marje. If someone astonish the griselda and they do not visit the marje then they chase the marje. If the eustacia is dashed then the eustacia divorce the spike. If the marje astonish the spike and the marje does not chase the eustacia then the marje astonish the eustacia. If someone practice the marje and they visit the griselda then they chase the griselda. If someone practice the marje then the marje is vestmented. If someone practice the marje then they see the eustacia. If someone astonish the eustacia then they visit the griselda. The griselda practice the griselda.", "logic": "\nAstonish(spike, griselda)\nPractice(spike, griselda)\nnot Divorce(eustacia, griselda)\nWindward(eustacia)\nnot Practice(eustacia, spike)\nPractice(eustacia, griselda)\nnot Divorce(griselda, spike)\nnot Windward(griselda)\nVestmented(griselda)\nUnfrosted(griselda)\nAstonish(griselda, spike)\nPractice(griselda, marje)\nDivorce(marje, spike)\nnot Divorce(marje, eustacia)\nAstonish(marje, spike)\nAstonish(marje, eustacia)\nforall x (Divorce(x, eustacia) -> Divorce(x, marje))\nforall x (Astonish(x, griselda) and not Practice(x, marje) -> Divorce(x, marje))\nDashed(eustacia) -> Divorce(eustacia, spike)\nAstonish(marje, spike) and not Divorce(marje, eustacia) -> Astonish(marje, eustacia)\nforall x (Practice(x, marje) and Practice(x, griselda) -> Divorce(x, griselda))\nforall x (Practice(x, marje) -> Vestmented(marje))\nforall x (Practice(x, marje) -> Astonish(x, eustacia))\nforall x (Astonish(x, eustacia) -> Practice(x, griselda))\n\nPractice(griselda, griselda)\n\nPractice(griselda, marje) and forall x (Practice(x, marje) -> Astonish(x, eustacia)) -> therefore Astonish(griselda, eustacia) Astonish(griselda, eustacia) and forall x (Astonish(x, eustacia) -> Practice(x, griselda)) -> therefore Practice(griselda, griselda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The nealon postdate the thomas. The nealon checker the thomas. The nada does not chase the thomas. The nada is amnesic. The nada does not visit the nealon. The nada checker the thomas. The thomas does not chase the nealon. The thomas is not amnesic. The thomas is answering. The thomas is binucleate. The thomas postdate the nealon. The thomas checker the tito. The tito resurface the nealon. The tito does not chase the nada. The tito postdate the nealon. The tito postdate the nada. If someone resurface the nada then they chase the tito. If someone postdate the thomas and they do not visit the tito then they chase the tito. If the nada is crackle then the nada resurface the nealon. If the tito postdate the nealon and the tito does not chase the nada then the tito postdate the nada. If someone checker the tito and they visit the thomas then they chase the thomas. If someone checker the tito then the tito is answering. If someone checker the tito then they see the nada. If someone postdate the nada then they visit the thomas. The thomas does not visit the thomas.", "logic": "\nPostdate(nealon, thomas)\nChecker(nealon, thomas)\nnot Resurface(nada, thomas)\nAmnesic(nada)\nnot Checker(nada, nealon)\nChecker(nada, thomas)\nnot Resurface(thomas, nealon)\nnot Amnesic(thomas)\nAnswering(thomas)\nBinucleate(thomas)\nPostdate(thomas, nealon)\nChecker(thomas, tito)\nResurface(tito, nealon)\nnot Resurface(tito, nada)\nPostdate(tito, nealon)\nPostdate(tito, nada)\nforall x (Resurface(x, nada) -> Resurface(x, tito))\nforall x (Postdate(x, thomas) and not Checker(x, tito) -> Resurface(x, tito))\nCrackle(nada) -> Resurface(nada, nealon)\nPostdate(tito, nealon) and not Resurface(tito, nada) -> Postdate(tito, nada)\nforall x (Checker(x, tito) and Checker(x, thomas) -> Resurface(x, thomas))\nforall x (Checker(x, tito) -> Answering(tito))\nforall x (Checker(x, tito) -> Postdate(x, nada))\nforall x (Postdate(x, nada) -> Checker(x, thomas))\n\nnot Checker(thomas, thomas)\n\nChecker(thomas, tito) and forall x (Checker(x, tito) -> Postdate(x, nada)) -> therefore Postdate(thomas, nada) Postdate(thomas, nada) and forall x (Postdate(x, nada) -> Checker(x, thomas)) -> therefore Checker(thomas, thomas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The roderic deign the margalo. The roderic dragoon the margalo. The dewitt does not chase the margalo. The dewitt is spirited. The dewitt does not visit the roderic. The dewitt dragoon the margalo. The margalo does not chase the roderic. The margalo is not spirited. The margalo is maniclike. The margalo is ambient. The margalo deign the roderic. The margalo dragoon the della. The della pour the roderic. The della does not chase the dewitt. The della deign the roderic. The della deign the dewitt. If someone pour the dewitt then they chase the della. If someone deign the margalo and they do not visit the della then they chase the della. If the dewitt is cupular then the dewitt pour the roderic. If the della deign the roderic and the della does not chase the dewitt then the della deign the dewitt. If someone dragoon the della and they visit the margalo then they chase the margalo. If someone dragoon the della then the della is maniclike. If someone dragoon the della then they see the dewitt. If someone deign the dewitt then they visit the margalo. The margalo does not chase the della.", "logic": "\nDeign(roderic, margalo)\nDragoon(roderic, margalo)\nnot Pour(dewitt, margalo)\nSpirited(dewitt)\nnot Dragoon(dewitt, roderic)\nDragoon(dewitt, margalo)\nnot Pour(margalo, roderic)\nnot Spirited(margalo)\nManiclike(margalo)\nAmbient(margalo)\nDeign(margalo, roderic)\nDragoon(margalo, della)\nPour(della, roderic)\nnot Pour(della, dewitt)\nDeign(della, roderic)\nDeign(della, dewitt)\nforall x (Pour(x, dewitt) -> Pour(x, della))\nforall x (Deign(x, margalo) and not Dragoon(x, della) -> Pour(x, della))\nCupular(dewitt) -> Pour(dewitt, roderic)\nDeign(della, roderic) and not Pour(della, dewitt) -> Deign(della, dewitt)\nforall x (Dragoon(x, della) and Dragoon(x, margalo) -> Pour(x, margalo))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, della) -> Maniclike(della))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, della) -> Deign(x, dewitt))\nforall x (Deign(x, dewitt) -> Dragoon(x, margalo))\n\nnot Pour(margalo, della)\n\nforall x (Pour(x, dewitt) -> Pour(x, della)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The eduard skylark the binni. The eduard abut the binni. The zorah does not chase the binni. The zorah is bracing. The zorah does not visit the eduard. The zorah abut the binni. The binni does not chase the eduard. The binni is not bracing. The binni is outlaw. The binni is kempt. The binni skylark the eduard. The binni abut the corri. The corri bull the eduard. The corri does not chase the zorah. The corri skylark the eduard. The corri skylark the zorah. If someone bull the zorah then they chase the corri. If someone skylark the binni and they do not visit the corri then they chase the corri. If the zorah is crispy then the zorah bull the eduard. If the corri skylark the eduard and the corri does not chase the zorah then the corri skylark the zorah. If someone abut the corri and they visit the binni then they chase the binni. If someone abut the corri then the corri is outlaw. If someone abut the corri then they see the zorah. If someone skylark the zorah then they visit the binni. The zorah bull the eduard.", "logic": "\nSkylark(eduard, binni)\nAbut(eduard, binni)\nnot Bull(zorah, binni)\nBracing(zorah)\nnot Abut(zorah, eduard)\nAbut(zorah, binni)\nnot Bull(binni, eduard)\nnot Bracing(binni)\nOutlaw(binni)\nKempt(binni)\nSkylark(binni, eduard)\nAbut(binni, corri)\nBull(corri, eduard)\nnot Bull(corri, zorah)\nSkylark(corri, eduard)\nSkylark(corri, zorah)\nforall x (Bull(x, zorah) -> Bull(x, corri))\nforall x (Skylark(x, binni) and not Abut(x, corri) -> Bull(x, corri))\nCrispy(zorah) -> Bull(zorah, eduard)\nSkylark(corri, eduard) and not Bull(corri, zorah) -> Skylark(corri, zorah)\nforall x (Abut(x, corri) and Abut(x, binni) -> Bull(x, binni))\nforall x (Abut(x, corri) -> Outlaw(corri))\nforall x (Abut(x, corri) -> Skylark(x, zorah))\nforall x (Skylark(x, zorah) -> Abut(x, binni))\n\nBull(zorah, eduard)\n\nCrispy(zorah) -> Bull(zorah, eduard) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The lou remould the karena. The lou sling the karena. The reynard does not chase the karena. The reynard is leading. The reynard does not visit the lou. The reynard sling the karena. The karena does not chase the lou. The karena is not leading. The karena is eucaryotic. The karena is awakened. The karena remould the lou. The karena sling the friedric. The friedric spang the lou. The friedric does not chase the reynard. The friedric remould the lou. The friedric remould the reynard. If someone spang the reynard then they chase the friedric. If someone remould the karena and they do not visit the friedric then they chase the friedric. If the reynard is verdant then the reynard spang the lou. If the friedric remould the lou and the friedric does not chase the reynard then the friedric remould the reynard. If someone sling the friedric and they visit the karena then they chase the karena. If someone sling the friedric then the friedric is eucaryotic. If someone sling the friedric then they see the reynard. If someone remould the reynard then they visit the karena. The reynard does not see the reynard.", "logic": "\nRemould(lou, karena)\nSling(lou, karena)\nnot Spang(reynard, karena)\nLeading(reynard)\nnot Sling(reynard, lou)\nSling(reynard, karena)\nnot Spang(karena, lou)\nnot Leading(karena)\nEucaryotic(karena)\nAwakened(karena)\nRemould(karena, lou)\nSling(karena, friedric)\nSpang(friedric, lou)\nnot Spang(friedric, reynard)\nRemould(friedric, lou)\nRemould(friedric, reynard)\nforall x (Spang(x, reynard) -> Spang(x, friedric))\nforall x (Remould(x, karena) and not Sling(x, friedric) -> Spang(x, friedric))\nVerdant(reynard) -> Spang(reynard, lou)\nRemould(friedric, lou) and not Spang(friedric, reynard) -> Remould(friedric, reynard)\nforall x (Sling(x, friedric) and Sling(x, karena) -> Spang(x, karena))\nforall x (Sling(x, friedric) -> Eucaryotic(friedric))\nforall x (Sling(x, friedric) -> Remould(x, reynard))\nforall x (Remould(x, reynard) -> Sling(x, karena))\n\nnot Remould(reynard, reynard)\n\nforall x (Sling(x, friedric) -> Remould(x, reynard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The liana ditto the herrmann. The liana curdle the herrmann. The web does not chase the herrmann. The web is dextrous. The web does not visit the liana. The web curdle the herrmann. The herrmann does not chase the liana. The herrmann is not dextrous. The herrmann is untrusty. The herrmann is steadied. The herrmann ditto the liana. The herrmann curdle the bettie. The bettie dispose the liana. The bettie does not chase the web. The bettie ditto the liana. The bettie ditto the web. If someone dispose the web then they chase the bettie. If someone ditto the herrmann and they do not visit the bettie then they chase the bettie. If the web is sylphlike then the web dispose the liana. If the bettie ditto the liana and the bettie does not chase the web then the bettie ditto the web. If someone curdle the bettie and they visit the herrmann then they chase the herrmann. If someone curdle the bettie then the bettie is untrusty. If someone curdle the bettie then they see the web. If someone ditto the web then they visit the herrmann. The bettie ditto the herrmann.", "logic": "\nDitto(liana, herrmann)\nCurdle(liana, herrmann)\nnot Dispose(web, herrmann)\nDextrous(web)\nnot Curdle(web, liana)\nCurdle(web, herrmann)\nnot Dispose(herrmann, liana)\nnot Dextrous(herrmann)\nUntrusty(herrmann)\nSteadied(herrmann)\nDitto(herrmann, liana)\nCurdle(herrmann, bettie)\nDispose(bettie, liana)\nnot Dispose(bettie, web)\nDitto(bettie, liana)\nDitto(bettie, web)\nforall x (Dispose(x, web) -> Dispose(x, bettie))\nforall x (Ditto(x, herrmann) and not Curdle(x, bettie) -> Dispose(x, bettie))\nSylphlike(web) -> Dispose(web, liana)\nDitto(bettie, liana) and not Dispose(bettie, web) -> Ditto(bettie, web)\nforall x (Curdle(x, bettie) and Curdle(x, herrmann) -> Dispose(x, herrmann))\nforall x (Curdle(x, bettie) -> Untrusty(bettie))\nforall x (Curdle(x, bettie) -> Ditto(x, web))\nforall x (Ditto(x, web) -> Curdle(x, herrmann))\n\nDitto(bettie, herrmann)\n\nDitto(bettie, herrmann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The howard broaden the gershom. The howard spot the gershom. The joannes does not chase the gershom. The joannes is cornish. The joannes does not visit the howard. The joannes spot the gershom. The gershom does not chase the howard. The gershom is not cornish. The gershom is louche. The gershom is untanned. The gershom broaden the howard. The gershom spot the kissiah. The kissiah defeat the howard. The kissiah does not chase the joannes. The kissiah broaden the howard. The kissiah broaden the joannes. If someone defeat the joannes then they chase the kissiah. If someone broaden the gershom and they do not visit the kissiah then they chase the kissiah. If the joannes is purging then the joannes defeat the howard. If the kissiah broaden the howard and the kissiah does not chase the joannes then the kissiah broaden the joannes. If someone spot the kissiah and they visit the gershom then they chase the gershom. If someone spot the kissiah then the kissiah is louche. If someone spot the kissiah then they see the joannes. If someone broaden the joannes then they visit the gershom. The gershom does not visit the joannes.", "logic": "\nBroaden(howard, gershom)\nSpot(howard, gershom)\nnot Defeat(joannes, gershom)\nCornish(joannes)\nnot Spot(joannes, howard)\nSpot(joannes, gershom)\nnot Defeat(gershom, howard)\nnot Cornish(gershom)\nLouche(gershom)\nUntanned(gershom)\nBroaden(gershom, howard)\nSpot(gershom, kissiah)\nDefeat(kissiah, howard)\nnot Defeat(kissiah, joannes)\nBroaden(kissiah, howard)\nBroaden(kissiah, joannes)\nforall x (Defeat(x, joannes) -> Defeat(x, kissiah))\nforall x (Broaden(x, gershom) and not Spot(x, kissiah) -> Defeat(x, kissiah))\nPurging(joannes) -> Defeat(joannes, howard)\nBroaden(kissiah, howard) and not Defeat(kissiah, joannes) -> Broaden(kissiah, joannes)\nforall x (Spot(x, kissiah) and Spot(x, gershom) -> Defeat(x, gershom))\nforall x (Spot(x, kissiah) -> Louche(kissiah))\nforall x (Spot(x, kissiah) -> Broaden(x, joannes))\nforall x (Broaden(x, joannes) -> Spot(x, gershom))\n\nnot Spot(gershom, joannes)\n\nnot Spot(gershom, joannes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "The hamlet beat the rochester. The hamlet outstay the rochester. The denise does not chase the rochester. The denise is occluded. The denise does not visit the hamlet. The denise outstay the rochester. The rochester does not chase the hamlet. The rochester is not occluded. The rochester is cumulous. The rochester is shelvy. The rochester beat the hamlet. The rochester outstay the kevin. The kevin thieve the hamlet. The kevin does not chase the denise. The kevin beat the hamlet. The kevin beat the denise. If someone thieve the denise then they chase the kevin. If someone beat the rochester and they do not visit the kevin then they chase the kevin. If the denise is diarrhoeal then the denise thieve the hamlet. If the kevin beat the hamlet and the kevin does not chase the denise then the kevin beat the denise. If someone outstay the kevin and they visit the rochester then they chase the rochester. If someone outstay the kevin then the kevin is cumulous. If someone outstay the kevin then they see the denise. If someone beat the denise then they visit the rochester. The kevin beat the kevin.", "logic": "\nBeat(hamlet, rochester)\nOutstay(hamlet, rochester)\nnot Thieve(denise, rochester)\nOccluded(denise)\nnot Outstay(denise, hamlet)\nOutstay(denise, rochester)\nnot Thieve(rochester, hamlet)\nnot Occluded(rochester)\nCumulous(rochester)\nShelvy(rochester)\nBeat(rochester, hamlet)\nOutstay(rochester, kevin)\nThieve(kevin, hamlet)\nnot Thieve(kevin, denise)\nBeat(kevin, hamlet)\nBeat(kevin, denise)\nforall x (Thieve(x, denise) -> Thieve(x, kevin))\nforall x (Beat(x, rochester) and not Outstay(x, kevin) -> Thieve(x, kevin))\nDiarrhoeal(denise) -> Thieve(denise, hamlet)\nBeat(kevin, hamlet) and not Thieve(kevin, denise) -> Beat(kevin, denise)\nforall x (Outstay(x, kevin) and Outstay(x, rochester) -> Thieve(x, rochester))\nforall x (Outstay(x, kevin) -> Cumulous(kevin))\nforall x (Outstay(x, kevin) -> Beat(x, denise))\nforall x (Beat(x, denise) -> Outstay(x, rochester))\n\nBeat(kevin, kevin)\n\nBeat(kevin, kevin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1636"} {"premises": "Ailey is not depictive. Matilde is brahminic. Vijay is depictive. If something is habitual and depictive then it is intrinsic. Smart things are not intrinsic. If something is depictive and not intrinsic then it is tuppeny. Ailey is not depictive.", "logic": "\nnot Depictive(ailey)\nBrahminic(matilde)\nDepictive(vijay)\nforall x (Habitual(x) and Depictive(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Depictive(x) -> not Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Depictive(x) and not Intrinsic(x) -> Tuppeny(x))\n\nnot Depictive(ailey)\n\ntherefore not Depictive(ailey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Editha is not nutbrown. Tandie is adjectival. Carroll is nutbrown. If something is ginger and nutbrown then it is giddy. Smart things are not giddy. If something is nutbrown and not giddy then it is grainy. Editha is nutbrown.", "logic": "\nnot Nutbrown(editha)\nAdjectival(tandie)\nNutbrown(carroll)\nforall x (Ginger(x) and Nutbrown(x) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) -> not Giddy(x))\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) and not Giddy(x) -> Grainy(x))\n\nNutbrown(editha)\n\ntherefore not Nutbrown(editha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Hakim is not derogative. Fred is limiting. Timothy is derogative. If something is hagridden and derogative then it is violable. Smart things are not violable. If something is derogative and not violable then it is tubelike. Timothy is not violable.", "logic": "\nnot Derogative(hakim)\nLimiting(fred)\nDerogative(timothy)\nforall x (Hagridden(x) and Derogative(x) -> Violable(x))\nforall x (Derogative(x) -> not Violable(x))\nforall x (Derogative(x) and not Violable(x) -> Tubelike(x))\n\nnot Violable(timothy)\n\nDerogative(timothy) and forall x (Derogative(x) -> not Violable(x)) -> therefore not Violable(timothy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Debra is not adaptative. Juliette is courteous. Nela is adaptative. If something is marked and adaptative then it is pernickety. Smart things are not pernickety. If something is adaptative and not pernickety then it is weakened. Nela is pernickety.", "logic": "\nnot Adaptative(debra)\nCourteous(juliette)\nAdaptative(nela)\nforall x (Marked(x) and Adaptative(x) -> Pernickety(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> not Pernickety(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and not Pernickety(x) -> Weakened(x))\n\nPernickety(nela)\n\nAdaptative(nela) and forall x (Adaptative(x) -> not Pernickety(x)) -> therefore not Pernickety(nela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Lottie is not sunset. Wald is spectacled. Liora is sunset. If something is ambivalent and sunset then it is allusive. Smart things are not allusive. If something is sunset and not allusive then it is splenetic. Liora is splenetic.", "logic": "\nnot Sunset(lottie)\nSpectacled(wald)\nSunset(liora)\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) and Sunset(x) -> Allusive(x))\nforall x (Sunset(x) -> not Allusive(x))\nforall x (Sunset(x) and not Allusive(x) -> Splenetic(x))\n\nSplenetic(liora)\n\nSunset(liora) and forall x (Sunset(x) -> not Allusive(x)) -> therefore not Allusive(liora) Sunset(liora) and not Allusive(liora) and forall x (Sunset(x) and not Allusive(x) -> Splenetic(x)) -> therefore Splenetic(liora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Juditha is not unfixed. Nari is seated. Karla is unfixed. If something is untoothed and unfixed then it is parochial. Smart things are not parochial. If something is unfixed and not parochial then it is bastard. Karla is not bastard.", "logic": "\nnot Unfixed(juditha)\nSeated(nari)\nUnfixed(karla)\nforall x (Untoothed(x) and Unfixed(x) -> Parochial(x))\nforall x (Unfixed(x) -> not Parochial(x))\nforall x (Unfixed(x) and not Parochial(x) -> Bastard(x))\n\nnot Bastard(karla)\n\nUnfixed(karla) and forall x (Unfixed(x) -> not Parochial(x)) -> therefore not Parochial(karla) Unfixed(karla) and not Parochial(karla) and forall x (Unfixed(x) and not Parochial(x) -> Bastard(x)) -> therefore Bastard(karla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Dacie is not resistless. Antonin is choragic. Lorenzo is resistless. If something is morphemic and resistless then it is uveal. Smart things are not uveal. If something is resistless and not uveal then it is militant. Dacie is not uveal.", "logic": "\nnot Resistless(dacie)\nChoragic(antonin)\nResistless(lorenzo)\nforall x (Morphemic(x) and Resistless(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> not Uveal(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) and not Uveal(x) -> Militant(x))\n\nnot Uveal(dacie)\n\nforall x (Morphemic(x) and Resistless(x) -> Uveal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Rakel is not foggy. Janeva is cheeky. Bernadene is foggy. If something is aesthetic and foggy then it is mortifying. Smart things are not mortifying. If something is foggy and not mortifying then it is variant. Janeva is variant.", "logic": "\nnot Foggy(rakel)\nCheeky(janeva)\nFoggy(bernadene)\nforall x (Aesthetic(x) and Foggy(x) -> Mortifying(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> not Mortifying(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) and not Mortifying(x) -> Variant(x))\n\nVariant(janeva)\n\nforall x (Foggy(x) and not Mortifying(x) -> Variant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Kaylil is not unforceful. Rafael is charnel. Milli is unforceful. If something is halt and unforceful then it is pomaded. Smart things are not pomaded. If something is unforceful and not pomaded then it is catkinate. Kaylil is not catkinate.", "logic": "\nnot Unforceful(kaylil)\nCharnel(rafael)\nUnforceful(milli)\nforall x (Halt(x) and Unforceful(x) -> Pomaded(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) -> not Pomaded(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) and not Pomaded(x) -> Catkinate(x))\n\nnot Catkinate(kaylil)\n\nforall x (Unforceful(x) and not Pomaded(x) -> Catkinate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Karmen is not peachy. Kaleb is diabolical. Pascale is peachy. If something is cheliceral and peachy then it is towering. Smart things are not towering. If something is peachy and not towering then it is ideational. Pascale is diabolical.", "logic": "\nnot Peachy(karmen)\nDiabolical(kaleb)\nPeachy(pascale)\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) and Peachy(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Peachy(x) -> not Towering(x))\nforall x (Peachy(x) and not Towering(x) -> Ideational(x))\n\nDiabolical(pascale)\n\nDiabolical(pascale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Nickey is not dividable. Sanders is accessary. Ignaz is dividable. If something is roving and dividable then it is forceless. Smart things are not forceless. If something is dividable and not forceless then it is olympic. Nickey is not rough.", "logic": "\nnot Dividable(nickey)\nAccessary(sanders)\nDividable(ignaz)\nforall x (Roving(x) and Dividable(x) -> Forceless(x))\nforall x (Dividable(x) -> not Forceless(x))\nforall x (Dividable(x) and not Forceless(x) -> Olympic(x))\n\nnot Rough(nickey)\n\nnot Rough(nickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "Matilde is not licit. Analise is unsought. Dodie is licit. If something is thermic and licit then it is suspensive. Smart things are not suspensive. If something is licit and not suspensive then it is extendible. Dodie is rough.", "logic": "\nnot Licit(matilde)\nUnsought(analise)\nLicit(dodie)\nforall x (Thermic(x) and Licit(x) -> Suspensive(x))\nforall x (Licit(x) -> not Suspensive(x))\nforall x (Licit(x) and not Suspensive(x) -> Extendible(x))\n\nRough(dodie)\n\nRough(dodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-262"} {"premises": "The sherill vowelize the neale. The sherill vowelize the stephen. The sherill waterproof the stephen. The sherill is chummy. The sherill is nodulated. The sherill clutter the stephen. The neale is nodulated. The neale clutter the stephen. The stephen is nodulated. The stephen clutter the sherill. If someone waterproof the stephen then they chase the sherill. If someone clutter the stephen then they do not eat the sherill. If someone clutter the stephen then they are nodulated. If someone vowelize the neale then the neale waterproof the stephen. If someone is nodulated then they eat the neale. If someone is chummy and they do not eat the stephen then they visit the neale. The sherill is nodulated.", "logic": "\nVowelize(sherill, neale)\nVowelize(sherill, stephen)\nWaterproof(sherill, stephen)\nChummy(sherill)\nNodulated(sherill)\nClutter(sherill, stephen)\nNodulated(neale)\nClutter(neale, stephen)\nNodulated(stephen)\nClutter(stephen, sherill)\nforall x (Waterproof(x, stephen) -> Vowelize(x, sherill))\nforall x (Clutter(x, stephen) -> not Waterproof(x, sherill))\nforall x (Clutter(x, stephen) -> Nodulated(x))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, neale) -> Waterproof(neale, stephen))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Waterproof(x, neale))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and not Waterproof(x, stephen) -> Clutter(x, neale))\n\nNodulated(sherill)\n\ntherefore Nodulated(sherill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The debor suspect the casper. The debor suspect the traci. The debor migrate the traci. The debor is bacterial. The debor is bipartizan. The debor tape the traci. The casper is bipartizan. The casper tape the traci. The traci is bipartizan. The traci tape the debor. If someone migrate the traci then they chase the debor. If someone tape the traci then they do not eat the debor. If someone tape the traci then they are bipartizan. If someone suspect the casper then the casper migrate the traci. If someone is bipartizan then they eat the casper. If someone is bacterial and they do not eat the traci then they visit the casper. The traci does not visit the debor.", "logic": "\nSuspect(debor, casper)\nSuspect(debor, traci)\nMigrate(debor, traci)\nBacterial(debor)\nBipartizan(debor)\nTape(debor, traci)\nBipartizan(casper)\nTape(casper, traci)\nBipartizan(traci)\nTape(traci, debor)\nforall x (Migrate(x, traci) -> Suspect(x, debor))\nforall x (Tape(x, traci) -> not Migrate(x, debor))\nforall x (Tape(x, traci) -> Bipartizan(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x, casper) -> Migrate(casper, traci))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> Migrate(x, casper))\nforall x (Bacterial(x) and not Migrate(x, traci) -> Tape(x, casper))\n\nnot Tape(traci, debor)\n\ntherefore Tape(traci, debor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The josselyn range the jethro. The josselyn range the wynn. The josselyn cooccur the wynn. The josselyn is silverish. The josselyn is adsorptive. The josselyn vilify the wynn. The jethro is adsorptive. The jethro vilify the wynn. The wynn is adsorptive. The wynn vilify the josselyn. If someone cooccur the wynn then they chase the josselyn. If someone vilify the wynn then they do not eat the josselyn. If someone vilify the wynn then they are adsorptive. If someone range the jethro then the jethro cooccur the wynn. If someone is adsorptive then they eat the jethro. If someone is silverish and they do not eat the wynn then they visit the jethro. The jethro does not eat the josselyn.", "logic": "\nRange(josselyn, jethro)\nRange(josselyn, wynn)\nCooccur(josselyn, wynn)\nSilverish(josselyn)\nAdsorptive(josselyn)\nVilify(josselyn, wynn)\nAdsorptive(jethro)\nVilify(jethro, wynn)\nAdsorptive(wynn)\nVilify(wynn, josselyn)\nforall x (Cooccur(x, wynn) -> Range(x, josselyn))\nforall x (Vilify(x, wynn) -> not Cooccur(x, josselyn))\nforall x (Vilify(x, wynn) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Range(x, jethro) -> Cooccur(jethro, wynn))\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) -> Cooccur(x, jethro))\nforall x (Silverish(x) and not Cooccur(x, wynn) -> Vilify(x, jethro))\n\nnot Cooccur(jethro, josselyn)\n\nVilify(jethro, wynn) and forall x (Vilify(x, wynn) -> not Cooccur(x, josselyn)) -> therefore not Cooccur(jethro, josselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The fancy waffle the venita. The fancy waffle the cathryn. The fancy elucidate the cathryn. The fancy is literal. The fancy is dogging. The fancy logroll the cathryn. The venita is dogging. The venita logroll the cathryn. The cathryn is dogging. The cathryn logroll the fancy. If someone elucidate the cathryn then they chase the fancy. If someone logroll the cathryn then they do not eat the fancy. If someone logroll the cathryn then they are dogging. If someone waffle the venita then the venita elucidate the cathryn. If someone is dogging then they eat the venita. If someone is literal and they do not eat the cathryn then they visit the venita. The cathryn does not eat the venita.", "logic": "\nWaffle(fancy, venita)\nWaffle(fancy, cathryn)\nElucidate(fancy, cathryn)\nLiteral(fancy)\nDogging(fancy)\nLogroll(fancy, cathryn)\nDogging(venita)\nLogroll(venita, cathryn)\nDogging(cathryn)\nLogroll(cathryn, fancy)\nforall x (Elucidate(x, cathryn) -> Waffle(x, fancy))\nforall x (Logroll(x, cathryn) -> not Elucidate(x, fancy))\nforall x (Logroll(x, cathryn) -> Dogging(x))\nforall x (Waffle(x, venita) -> Elucidate(venita, cathryn))\nforall x (Dogging(x) -> Elucidate(x, venita))\nforall x (Literal(x) and not Elucidate(x, cathryn) -> Logroll(x, venita))\n\nnot Elucidate(cathryn, venita)\n\nDogging(cathryn) and forall x (Dogging(x) -> Elucidate(x, venita)) -> therefore Elucidate(cathryn, venita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The reese wipe the berk. The reese wipe the jessamyn. The reese verdigris the jessamyn. The reese is bicorn. The reese is unwedded. The reese shanghai the jessamyn. The berk is unwedded. The berk shanghai the jessamyn. The jessamyn is unwedded. The jessamyn shanghai the reese. If someone verdigris the jessamyn then they chase the reese. If someone shanghai the jessamyn then they do not eat the reese. If someone shanghai the jessamyn then they are unwedded. If someone wipe the berk then the berk verdigris the jessamyn. If someone is unwedded then they eat the berk. If someone is bicorn and they do not eat the jessamyn then they visit the berk. The berk wipe the reese.", "logic": "\nWipe(reese, berk)\nWipe(reese, jessamyn)\nVerdigris(reese, jessamyn)\nBicorn(reese)\nUnwedded(reese)\nShanghai(reese, jessamyn)\nUnwedded(berk)\nShanghai(berk, jessamyn)\nUnwedded(jessamyn)\nShanghai(jessamyn, reese)\nforall x (Verdigris(x, jessamyn) -> Wipe(x, reese))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, jessamyn) -> not Verdigris(x, reese))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, jessamyn) -> Unwedded(x))\nforall x (Wipe(x, berk) -> Verdigris(berk, jessamyn))\nforall x (Unwedded(x) -> Verdigris(x, berk))\nforall x (Bicorn(x) and not Verdigris(x, jessamyn) -> Shanghai(x, berk))\n\nWipe(berk, reese)\n\nWipe(reese, berk) and forall x (Wipe(x, berk) -> Verdigris(berk, jessamyn)) -> therefore Verdigris(berk, jessamyn) Verdigris(berk, jessamyn) and forall x (Verdigris(x, jessamyn) -> Wipe(x, reese)) -> therefore Wipe(berk, reese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The carter charleston the chrysa. The carter charleston the jannelle. The carter group the jannelle. The carter is peaky. The carter is savorless. The carter enlighten the jannelle. The chrysa is savorless. The chrysa enlighten the jannelle. The jannelle is savorless. The jannelle enlighten the carter. If someone group the jannelle then they chase the carter. If someone enlighten the jannelle then they do not eat the carter. If someone enlighten the jannelle then they are savorless. If someone charleston the chrysa then the chrysa group the jannelle. If someone is savorless then they eat the chrysa. If someone is peaky and they do not eat the jannelle then they visit the chrysa. The chrysa does not chase the carter.", "logic": "\nCharleston(carter, chrysa)\nCharleston(carter, jannelle)\nGroup(carter, jannelle)\nPeaky(carter)\nSavorless(carter)\nEnlighten(carter, jannelle)\nSavorless(chrysa)\nEnlighten(chrysa, jannelle)\nSavorless(jannelle)\nEnlighten(jannelle, carter)\nforall x (Group(x, jannelle) -> Charleston(x, carter))\nforall x (Enlighten(x, jannelle) -> not Group(x, carter))\nforall x (Enlighten(x, jannelle) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Charleston(x, chrysa) -> Group(chrysa, jannelle))\nforall x (Savorless(x) -> Group(x, chrysa))\nforall x (Peaky(x) and not Group(x, jannelle) -> Enlighten(x, chrysa))\n\nnot Charleston(chrysa, carter)\n\nCharleston(carter, chrysa) and forall x (Charleston(x, chrysa) -> Group(chrysa, jannelle)) -> therefore Group(chrysa, jannelle) Group(chrysa, jannelle) and forall x (Group(x, jannelle) -> Charleston(x, carter)) -> therefore Charleston(chrysa, carter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The bessy compound the lolly. The bessy compound the bessy. The bessy hydroplane the bessy. The bessy is delusory. The bessy is foreboding. The bessy colly the bessy. The lolly is foreboding. The lolly colly the bessy. The bessy is foreboding. The bessy colly the bessy. If someone hydroplane the bessy then they chase the bessy. If someone colly the bessy then they do not eat the bessy. If someone colly the bessy then they are foreboding. If someone compound the lolly then the lolly hydroplane the bessy. If someone is foreboding then they eat the lolly. If someone is delusory and they do not eat the bessy then they visit the lolly. The bessy does not chase the bessy.", "logic": "\nCompound(bessy, lolly)\nCompound(bessy, bessy)\nHydroplane(bessy, bessy)\nDelusory(bessy)\nForeboding(bessy)\nColly(bessy, bessy)\nForeboding(lolly)\nColly(lolly, bessy)\nForeboding(bessy)\nColly(bessy, bessy)\nforall x (Hydroplane(x, bessy) -> Compound(x, bessy))\nforall x (Colly(x, bessy) -> not Hydroplane(x, bessy))\nforall x (Colly(x, bessy) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Compound(x, lolly) -> Hydroplane(lolly, bessy))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Hydroplane(x, lolly))\nforall x (Delusory(x) and not Hydroplane(x, bessy) -> Colly(x, lolly))\n\nnot Compound(bessy, bessy)\n\nforall x (Hydroplane(x, bessy) -> Compound(x, bessy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The nanon julienne the brianne. The nanon julienne the kiah. The nanon panel the kiah. The nanon is crusted. The nanon is stooped. The nanon rearrange the kiah. The brianne is stooped. The brianne rearrange the kiah. The kiah is stooped. The kiah rearrange the nanon. If someone panel the kiah then they chase the nanon. If someone rearrange the kiah then they do not eat the nanon. If someone rearrange the kiah then they are stooped. If someone julienne the brianne then the brianne panel the kiah. If someone is stooped then they eat the brianne. If someone is crusted and they do not eat the kiah then they visit the brianne. The kiah rearrange the brianne.", "logic": "\nJulienne(nanon, brianne)\nJulienne(nanon, kiah)\nPanel(nanon, kiah)\nCrusted(nanon)\nStooped(nanon)\nRearrange(nanon, kiah)\nStooped(brianne)\nRearrange(brianne, kiah)\nStooped(kiah)\nRearrange(kiah, nanon)\nforall x (Panel(x, kiah) -> Julienne(x, nanon))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, kiah) -> not Panel(x, nanon))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, kiah) -> Stooped(x))\nforall x (Julienne(x, brianne) -> Panel(brianne, kiah))\nforall x (Stooped(x) -> Panel(x, brianne))\nforall x (Crusted(x) and not Panel(x, kiah) -> Rearrange(x, brianne))\n\nRearrange(kiah, brianne)\n\nforall x (Crusted(x) and not Panel(x, kiah) -> Rearrange(x, brianne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The roch splat the tobie. The roch splat the aretha. The roch sock the aretha. The roch is bedrid. The roch is unfirm. The roch freelance the aretha. The tobie is unfirm. The tobie freelance the aretha. The aretha is unfirm. The aretha freelance the roch. If someone sock the aretha then they chase the roch. If someone freelance the aretha then they do not eat the roch. If someone freelance the aretha then they are unfirm. If someone splat the tobie then the tobie sock the aretha. If someone is unfirm then they eat the tobie. If someone is bedrid and they do not eat the aretha then they visit the tobie. The tobie does not visit the tobie.", "logic": "\nSplat(roch, tobie)\nSplat(roch, aretha)\nSock(roch, aretha)\nBedrid(roch)\nUnfirm(roch)\nFreelance(roch, aretha)\nUnfirm(tobie)\nFreelance(tobie, aretha)\nUnfirm(aretha)\nFreelance(aretha, roch)\nforall x (Sock(x, aretha) -> Splat(x, roch))\nforall x (Freelance(x, aretha) -> not Sock(x, roch))\nforall x (Freelance(x, aretha) -> Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Splat(x, tobie) -> Sock(tobie, aretha))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Sock(x, tobie))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and not Sock(x, aretha) -> Freelance(x, tobie))\n\nnot Freelance(tobie, tobie)\n\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and not Sock(x, aretha) -> Freelance(x, tobie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The clarinda flambe the lesley. The clarinda flambe the dedra. The clarinda circumcise the dedra. The clarinda is unbeknown. The clarinda is garish. The clarinda snub the dedra. The lesley is garish. The lesley snub the dedra. The dedra is garish. The dedra snub the clarinda. If someone circumcise the dedra then they chase the clarinda. If someone snub the dedra then they do not eat the clarinda. If someone snub the dedra then they are garish. If someone flambe the lesley then the lesley circumcise the dedra. If someone is garish then they eat the lesley. If someone is unbeknown and they do not eat the dedra then they visit the lesley. The clarinda is green.", "logic": "\nFlambe(clarinda, lesley)\nFlambe(clarinda, dedra)\nCircumcise(clarinda, dedra)\nUnbeknown(clarinda)\nGarish(clarinda)\nSnub(clarinda, dedra)\nGarish(lesley)\nSnub(lesley, dedra)\nGarish(dedra)\nSnub(dedra, clarinda)\nforall x (Circumcise(x, dedra) -> Flambe(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Snub(x, dedra) -> not Circumcise(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Snub(x, dedra) -> Garish(x))\nforall x (Flambe(x, lesley) -> Circumcise(lesley, dedra))\nforall x (Garish(x) -> Circumcise(x, lesley))\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) and not Circumcise(x, dedra) -> Snub(x, lesley))\n\nGreen(clarinda)\n\nGreen(clarinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The marsha relegate the starlin. The marsha relegate the eudora. The marsha term the eudora. The marsha is repressing. The marsha is hateful. The marsha roost the eudora. The starlin is hateful. The starlin roost the eudora. The eudora is hateful. The eudora roost the marsha. If someone term the eudora then they chase the marsha. If someone roost the eudora then they do not eat the marsha. If someone roost the eudora then they are hateful. If someone relegate the starlin then the starlin term the eudora. If someone is hateful then they eat the starlin. If someone is repressing and they do not eat the eudora then they visit the starlin. The eudora does not chase the starlin.", "logic": "\nRelegate(marsha, starlin)\nRelegate(marsha, eudora)\nTerm(marsha, eudora)\nRepressing(marsha)\nHateful(marsha)\nRoost(marsha, eudora)\nHateful(starlin)\nRoost(starlin, eudora)\nHateful(eudora)\nRoost(eudora, marsha)\nforall x (Term(x, eudora) -> Relegate(x, marsha))\nforall x (Roost(x, eudora) -> not Term(x, marsha))\nforall x (Roost(x, eudora) -> Hateful(x))\nforall x (Relegate(x, starlin) -> Term(starlin, eudora))\nforall x (Hateful(x) -> Term(x, starlin))\nforall x (Repressing(x) and not Term(x, eudora) -> Roost(x, starlin))\n\nnot Relegate(eudora, starlin)\n\nnot Relegate(eudora, starlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "The erich joyride the alysia. The erich joyride the carlyle. The erich image the carlyle. The erich is dualistic. The erich is caecilian. The erich paper the carlyle. The alysia is caecilian. The alysia paper the carlyle. The carlyle is caecilian. The carlyle paper the erich. If someone image the carlyle then they chase the erich. If someone paper the carlyle then they do not eat the erich. If someone paper the carlyle then they are caecilian. If someone joyride the alysia then the alysia image the carlyle. If someone is caecilian then they eat the alysia. If someone is dualistic and they do not eat the carlyle then they visit the alysia. The carlyle image the erich.", "logic": "\nJoyride(erich, alysia)\nJoyride(erich, carlyle)\nImage(erich, carlyle)\nDualistic(erich)\nCaecilian(erich)\nPaper(erich, carlyle)\nCaecilian(alysia)\nPaper(alysia, carlyle)\nCaecilian(carlyle)\nPaper(carlyle, erich)\nforall x (Image(x, carlyle) -> Joyride(x, erich))\nforall x (Paper(x, carlyle) -> not Image(x, erich))\nforall x (Paper(x, carlyle) -> Caecilian(x))\nforall x (Joyride(x, alysia) -> Image(alysia, carlyle))\nforall x (Caecilian(x) -> Image(x, alysia))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) and not Image(x, carlyle) -> Paper(x, alysia))\n\nImage(carlyle, erich)\n\nImage(carlyle, erich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-228"} {"premises": "Loree is galore. Norine is rummy. Norine is bonny. Ardyth is rummy. Ardyth is uncool. Selestina is unseeyn. Selestina is rummy. Selestina is uncool. Selestina is squared. Selestina is messianic. All bonny people are galore. Round, bonny people are rummy. All uncool, rummy people are bonny. Loree is galore.", "logic": "\nGalore(loree)\nRummy(norine)\nBonny(norine)\nRummy(ardyth)\nUncool(ardyth)\nUnseeyn(selestina)\nRummy(selestina)\nUncool(selestina)\nSquared(selestina)\nMessianic(selestina)\nforall x (Bonny(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) and Bonny(x) -> Rummy(x))\nforall x (Uncool(x) and Rummy(x) -> Bonny(x))\n\nGalore(loree)\n\ntherefore Galore(loree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Lorilyn is violable. Archibald is amphibious. Archibald is flashy. Kettie is amphibious. Kettie is vicennial. Wadsworth is meiotic. Wadsworth is amphibious. Wadsworth is vicennial. Wadsworth is pupillary. Wadsworth is collegiate. All flashy people are violable. Round, flashy people are amphibious. All vicennial, amphibious people are flashy. Archibald is not flashy.", "logic": "\nViolable(lorilyn)\nAmphibious(archibald)\nFlashy(archibald)\nAmphibious(kettie)\nVicennial(kettie)\nMeiotic(wadsworth)\nAmphibious(wadsworth)\nVicennial(wadsworth)\nPupillary(wadsworth)\nCollegiate(wadsworth)\nforall x (Flashy(x) -> Violable(x))\nforall x (Pupillary(x) and Flashy(x) -> Amphibious(x))\nforall x (Vicennial(x) and Amphibious(x) -> Flashy(x))\n\nnot Flashy(archibald)\n\ntherefore Flashy(archibald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Yanaton is frankish. Ruddy is detergent. Ruddy is domed. Nixie is detergent. Nixie is homocyclic. Bobinette is sidelong. Bobinette is detergent. Bobinette is homocyclic. Bobinette is polychrome. Bobinette is unmanlike. All domed people are frankish. Round, domed people are detergent. All homocyclic, detergent people are domed. Bobinette is domed.", "logic": "\nFrankish(yanaton)\nDetergent(ruddy)\nDomed(ruddy)\nDetergent(nixie)\nHomocyclic(nixie)\nSidelong(bobinette)\nDetergent(bobinette)\nHomocyclic(bobinette)\nPolychrome(bobinette)\nUnmanlike(bobinette)\nforall x (Domed(x) -> Frankish(x))\nforall x (Polychrome(x) and Domed(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and Detergent(x) -> Domed(x))\n\nDomed(bobinette)\n\nHomocyclic(bobinette) and Detergent(bobinette) and forall x (Homocyclic(x) and Detergent(x) -> Domed(x)) -> therefore Domed(bobinette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Sibeal is scheming. Curtis is bulgy. Curtis is branching. Loren is bulgy. Loren is treated. Judd is splashed. Judd is bulgy. Judd is treated. Judd is ischaemic. Judd is immotile. All branching people are scheming. Round, branching people are bulgy. All treated, bulgy people are branching. Loren is not branching.", "logic": "\nScheming(sibeal)\nBulgy(curtis)\nBranching(curtis)\nBulgy(loren)\nTreated(loren)\nSplashed(judd)\nBulgy(judd)\nTreated(judd)\nIschaemic(judd)\nImmotile(judd)\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Scheming(x))\nforall x (Ischaemic(x) and Branching(x) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Treated(x) and Bulgy(x) -> Branching(x))\n\nnot Branching(loren)\n\nTreated(loren) and Bulgy(loren) and forall x (Treated(x) and Bulgy(x) -> Branching(x)) -> therefore Branching(loren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Annetta is perplexed. Ailina is squamulose. Ailina is anapaestic. Mala is squamulose. Mala is quenched. Sherman is champion. Sherman is squamulose. Sherman is quenched. Sherman is chafflike. Sherman is restful. All anapaestic people are perplexed. Round, anapaestic people are squamulose. All quenched, squamulose people are anapaestic. Mala is perplexed.", "logic": "\nPerplexed(annetta)\nSquamulose(ailina)\nAnapaestic(ailina)\nSquamulose(mala)\nQuenched(mala)\nChampion(sherman)\nSquamulose(sherman)\nQuenched(sherman)\nChafflike(sherman)\nRestful(sherman)\nforall x (Anapaestic(x) -> Perplexed(x))\nforall x (Chafflike(x) and Anapaestic(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Quenched(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\n\nPerplexed(mala)\n\nQuenched(mala) and Squamulose(mala) and forall x (Quenched(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Anapaestic(x)) -> therefore Anapaestic(mala) Anapaestic(mala) and forall x (Anapaestic(x) -> Perplexed(x)) -> therefore Perplexed(mala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Lauralee is tunisian. Alyda is conformist. Alyda is remote. Tom is conformist. Tom is ineffable. Izzi is donnean. Izzi is conformist. Izzi is ineffable. Izzi is deciding. Izzi is weathered. All remote people are tunisian. Round, remote people are conformist. All ineffable, conformist people are remote. Tom is not tunisian.", "logic": "\nTunisian(lauralee)\nConformist(alyda)\nRemote(alyda)\nConformist(tom)\nIneffable(tom)\nDonnean(izzi)\nConformist(izzi)\nIneffable(izzi)\nDeciding(izzi)\nWeathered(izzi)\nforall x (Remote(x) -> Tunisian(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Remote(x) -> Conformist(x))\nforall x (Ineffable(x) and Conformist(x) -> Remote(x))\n\nnot Tunisian(tom)\n\nIneffable(tom) and Conformist(tom) and forall x (Ineffable(x) and Conformist(x) -> Remote(x)) -> therefore Remote(tom) Remote(tom) and forall x (Remote(x) -> Tunisian(x)) -> therefore Tunisian(tom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Torrie is teutonic. Stephana is packable. Stephana is impartial. Ichabod is packable. Ichabod is inherent. Ambrose is tabu. Ambrose is packable. Ambrose is inherent. Ambrose is horrid. Ambrose is unhoped. All impartial people are teutonic. Round, impartial people are packable. All inherent, packable people are impartial. Torrie is not impartial.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(torrie)\nPackable(stephana)\nImpartial(stephana)\nPackable(ichabod)\nInherent(ichabod)\nTabu(ambrose)\nPackable(ambrose)\nInherent(ambrose)\nHorrid(ambrose)\nUnhoped(ambrose)\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Teutonic(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) and Impartial(x) -> Packable(x))\nforall x (Inherent(x) and Packable(x) -> Impartial(x))\n\nnot Impartial(torrie)\n\nforall x (Inherent(x) and Packable(x) -> Impartial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Federica is motor. Jenilee is boss. Jenilee is federated. Israel is boss. Israel is foolhardy. Clarette is timid. Clarette is boss. Clarette is foolhardy. Clarette is semiotical. Clarette is southwest. All federated people are motor. Round, federated people are boss. All foolhardy, boss people are federated. Federica is boss.", "logic": "\nMotor(federica)\nBoss(jenilee)\nFederated(jenilee)\nBoss(israel)\nFoolhardy(israel)\nTimid(clarette)\nBoss(clarette)\nFoolhardy(clarette)\nSemiotical(clarette)\nSouthwest(clarette)\nforall x (Federated(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Semiotical(x) and Federated(x) -> Boss(x))\nforall x (Foolhardy(x) and Boss(x) -> Federated(x))\n\nBoss(federica)\n\nforall x (Semiotical(x) and Federated(x) -> Boss(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Gaven is aspheric. Dasi is injured. Dasi is slipping. Georges is injured. Georges is unprompted. Tommy is dour. Tommy is injured. Tommy is unprompted. Tommy is foggy. Tommy is ascending. All slipping people are aspheric. Round, slipping people are injured. All unprompted, injured people are slipping. Georges is not foggy.", "logic": "\nAspheric(gaven)\nInjured(dasi)\nSlipping(dasi)\nInjured(georges)\nUnprompted(georges)\nDour(tommy)\nInjured(tommy)\nUnprompted(tommy)\nFoggy(tommy)\nAscending(tommy)\nforall x (Slipping(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Slipping(x) -> Injured(x))\nforall x (Unprompted(x) and Injured(x) -> Slipping(x))\n\nnot Foggy(georges)\n\nnot Foggy(georges) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Eleni is bashful. Ezechiel is lovesick. Ezechiel is near. Alfred is lovesick. Alfred is dextral. Urbanus is measurable. Urbanus is lovesick. Urbanus is dextral. Urbanus is impending. Urbanus is lukewarm. All near people are bashful. Round, near people are lovesick. All dextral, lovesick people are near. Ezechiel is lukewarm.", "logic": "\nBashful(eleni)\nLovesick(ezechiel)\nNear(ezechiel)\nLovesick(alfred)\nDextral(alfred)\nMeasurable(urbanus)\nLovesick(urbanus)\nDextral(urbanus)\nImpending(urbanus)\nLukewarm(urbanus)\nforall x (Near(x) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Impending(x) and Near(x) -> Lovesick(x))\nforall x (Dextral(x) and Lovesick(x) -> Near(x))\n\nLukewarm(ezechiel)\n\nLukewarm(ezechiel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Batsheva is stitched. Aila is smoothbore. Aila is afeard. Orlando is smoothbore. Orlando is lusterless. Lorelle is cliquish. Lorelle is smoothbore. Lorelle is lusterless. Lorelle is dogmatic. Lorelle is excitative. All afeard people are stitched. Round, afeard people are smoothbore. All lusterless, smoothbore people are afeard. Orlando is not excitative.", "logic": "\nStitched(batsheva)\nSmoothbore(aila)\nAfeard(aila)\nSmoothbore(orlando)\nLusterless(orlando)\nCliquish(lorelle)\nSmoothbore(lorelle)\nLusterless(lorelle)\nDogmatic(lorelle)\nExcitative(lorelle)\nforall x (Afeard(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) and Afeard(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) and Smoothbore(x) -> Afeard(x))\n\nnot Excitative(orlando)\n\nnot Excitative(orlando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Izzi is apiculate. Baron is pleased. Baron is staring. Sidoney is pleased. Sidoney is direct. Nan is obsolete. Nan is pleased. Nan is direct. Nan is opencast. Nan is libidinal. All staring people are apiculate. Round, staring people are pleased. All direct, pleased people are staring. Baron is obsolete.", "logic": "\nApiculate(izzi)\nPleased(baron)\nStaring(baron)\nPleased(sidoney)\nDirect(sidoney)\nObsolete(nan)\nPleased(nan)\nDirect(nan)\nOpencast(nan)\nLibidinal(nan)\nforall x (Staring(x) -> Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Opencast(x) and Staring(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Direct(x) and Pleased(x) -> Staring(x))\n\nObsolete(baron)\n\nObsolete(baron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Farra is legged. Chase is uncolored. Sherry is legged. Dollie is unwitting. All unwitting, caecilian people are legged. All unwitting, bombastic people are stearic. If Chase is caecilian then Chase is legged. If someone is unwitting then they are caecilian. If someone is stearic and legged then they are bombastic. If someone is caecilian and uncolored then they are stearic. If Sherry is legged then Sherry is unwitting. All uncolored people are unwitting. Farra is legged.", "logic": "\nLegged(farra)\nUncolored(chase)\nLegged(sherry)\nUnwitting(dollie)\nforall x (Unwitting(x) and Caecilian(x) -> Legged(x))\nforall x (Unwitting(x) and Bombastic(x) -> Stearic(x))\nCaecilian(chase) -> Legged(chase)\nforall x (Unwitting(x) -> Caecilian(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) and Legged(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and Uncolored(x) -> Stearic(x))\nLegged(sherry) -> Unwitting(sherry)\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Unwitting(x))\n\nLegged(farra)\n\ntherefore Legged(farra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Cherilyn is fatigued. Kevan is overcast. Damien is fatigued. Anthia is tried. All tried, arillate people are fatigued. All tried, botswanan people are nominal. If Kevan is arillate then Kevan is fatigued. If someone is tried then they are arillate. If someone is nominal and fatigued then they are botswanan. If someone is arillate and overcast then they are nominal. If Damien is fatigued then Damien is tried. All overcast people are tried. Cherilyn is not fatigued.", "logic": "\nFatigued(cherilyn)\nOvercast(kevan)\nFatigued(damien)\nTried(anthia)\nforall x (Tried(x) and Arillate(x) -> Fatigued(x))\nforall x (Tried(x) and Botswanan(x) -> Nominal(x))\nArillate(kevan) -> Fatigued(kevan)\nforall x (Tried(x) -> Arillate(x))\nforall x (Nominal(x) and Fatigued(x) -> Botswanan(x))\nforall x (Arillate(x) and Overcast(x) -> Nominal(x))\nFatigued(damien) -> Tried(damien)\nforall x (Overcast(x) -> Tried(x))\n\nnot Fatigued(cherilyn)\n\ntherefore Fatigued(cherilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Matthaeus is venial. Lenora is nutritive. Leonelle is venial. Sarita is sickening. All sickening, facial people are venial. All sickening, truant people are consummate. If Lenora is facial then Lenora is venial. If someone is sickening then they are facial. If someone is consummate and venial then they are truant. If someone is facial and nutritive then they are consummate. If Leonelle is venial then Leonelle is sickening. All nutritive people are sickening. Leonelle is sickening.", "logic": "\nVenial(matthaeus)\nNutritive(lenora)\nVenial(leonelle)\nSickening(sarita)\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Facial(x) -> Venial(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Truant(x) -> Consummate(x))\nFacial(lenora) -> Venial(lenora)\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Facial(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) and Venial(x) -> Truant(x))\nforall x (Facial(x) and Nutritive(x) -> Consummate(x))\nVenial(leonelle) -> Sickening(leonelle)\nforall x (Nutritive(x) -> Sickening(x))\n\nSickening(leonelle)\n\nVenial(leonelle) and Venial(leonelle) -> Sickening(leonelle) -> therefore Sickening(leonelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Ernst is darkish. Garcon is crisp. Nat is darkish. Hetti is erogenous. All erogenous, amorous people are darkish. All erogenous, spotted people are bilobed. If Garcon is amorous then Garcon is darkish. If someone is erogenous then they are amorous. If someone is bilobed and darkish then they are spotted. If someone is amorous and crisp then they are bilobed. If Nat is darkish then Nat is erogenous. All crisp people are erogenous. Garcon is not erogenous.", "logic": "\nDarkish(ernst)\nCrisp(garcon)\nDarkish(nat)\nErogenous(hetti)\nforall x (Erogenous(x) and Amorous(x) -> Darkish(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) and Spotted(x) -> Bilobed(x))\nAmorous(garcon) -> Darkish(garcon)\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Amorous(x))\nforall x (Bilobed(x) and Darkish(x) -> Spotted(x))\nforall x (Amorous(x) and Crisp(x) -> Bilobed(x))\nDarkish(nat) -> Erogenous(nat)\nforall x (Crisp(x) -> Erogenous(x))\n\nnot Erogenous(garcon)\n\nCrisp(garcon) and forall x (Crisp(x) -> Erogenous(x)) -> therefore Erogenous(garcon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Aube is decorous. Eduard is usable. Minda is decorous. Roby is transpolar. All transpolar, textbook people are decorous. All transpolar, rousing people are nicaraguan. If Eduard is textbook then Eduard is decorous. If someone is transpolar then they are textbook. If someone is nicaraguan and decorous then they are rousing. If someone is textbook and usable then they are nicaraguan. If Minda is decorous then Minda is transpolar. All usable people are transpolar. Minda is textbook.", "logic": "\nDecorous(aube)\nUsable(eduard)\nDecorous(minda)\nTranspolar(roby)\nforall x (Transpolar(x) and Textbook(x) -> Decorous(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) and Rousing(x) -> Nicaraguan(x))\nTextbook(eduard) -> Decorous(eduard)\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> Textbook(x))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) and Decorous(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Textbook(x) and Usable(x) -> Nicaraguan(x))\nDecorous(minda) -> Transpolar(minda)\nforall x (Usable(x) -> Transpolar(x))\n\nTextbook(minda)\n\nDecorous(minda) and Decorous(minda) -> Transpolar(minda) -> therefore Transpolar(minda) Transpolar(minda) and forall x (Transpolar(x) -> Textbook(x)) -> therefore Textbook(minda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Curtice is aflicker. Ninette is lenitive. Germana is aflicker. Brooks is valueless. All valueless, dazed people are aflicker. All valueless, each people are semisweet. If Ninette is dazed then Ninette is aflicker. If someone is valueless then they are dazed. If someone is semisweet and aflicker then they are each. If someone is dazed and lenitive then they are semisweet. If Germana is aflicker then Germana is valueless. All lenitive people are valueless. Ninette is not dazed.", "logic": "\nAflicker(curtice)\nLenitive(ninette)\nAflicker(germana)\nValueless(brooks)\nforall x (Valueless(x) and Dazed(x) -> Aflicker(x))\nforall x (Valueless(x) and Each(x) -> Semisweet(x))\nDazed(ninette) -> Aflicker(ninette)\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> Dazed(x))\nforall x (Semisweet(x) and Aflicker(x) -> Each(x))\nforall x (Dazed(x) and Lenitive(x) -> Semisweet(x))\nAflicker(germana) -> Valueless(germana)\nforall x (Lenitive(x) -> Valueless(x))\n\nnot Dazed(ninette)\n\nLenitive(ninette) and forall x (Lenitive(x) -> Valueless(x)) -> therefore Valueless(ninette) Valueless(ninette) and forall x (Valueless(x) -> Dazed(x)) -> therefore Dazed(ninette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Rutter is heinous. Doyle is unwrapped. Fabian is heinous. Devina is phyletic. All phyletic, humoral people are heinous. All phyletic, unsigned people are quechuan. If Doyle is humoral then Doyle is heinous. If someone is phyletic then they are humoral. If someone is quechuan and heinous then they are unsigned. If someone is humoral and unwrapped then they are quechuan. If Fabian is heinous then Fabian is phyletic. All unwrapped people are phyletic. Rutter is not unsigned.", "logic": "\nHeinous(rutter)\nUnwrapped(doyle)\nHeinous(fabian)\nPhyletic(devina)\nforall x (Phyletic(x) and Humoral(x) -> Heinous(x))\nforall x (Phyletic(x) and Unsigned(x) -> Quechuan(x))\nHumoral(doyle) -> Heinous(doyle)\nforall x (Phyletic(x) -> Humoral(x))\nforall x (Quechuan(x) and Heinous(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Humoral(x) and Unwrapped(x) -> Quechuan(x))\nHeinous(fabian) -> Phyletic(fabian)\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Phyletic(x))\n\nnot Unsigned(rutter)\n\nforall x (Quechuan(x) and Heinous(x) -> Unsigned(x)) <- forall x (Phyletic(x) and Unsigned(x) -> Quechuan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Gardener is scanty. Jess is vendable. Alfonso is scanty. Sonnnie is cozy. All cozy, dampish people are scanty. All cozy, rhomboid people are arteriolar. If Jess is dampish then Jess is scanty. If someone is cozy then they are dampish. If someone is arteriolar and scanty then they are rhomboid. If someone is dampish and vendable then they are arteriolar. If Alfonso is scanty then Alfonso is cozy. All vendable people are cozy. Gardener is dampish.", "logic": "\nScanty(gardener)\nVendable(jess)\nScanty(alfonso)\nCozy(sonnnie)\nforall x (Cozy(x) and Dampish(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Cozy(x) and Rhomboid(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nDampish(jess) -> Scanty(jess)\nforall x (Cozy(x) -> Dampish(x))\nforall x (Arteriolar(x) and Scanty(x) -> Rhomboid(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Vendable(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nScanty(alfonso) -> Cozy(alfonso)\nforall x (Vendable(x) -> Cozy(x))\n\nDampish(gardener)\n\nforall x (Cozy(x) -> Dampish(x)) <- forall x (Vendable(x) -> Cozy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Arnoldo is jolty. Hanny is fortified. Vanny is jolty. Trace is unbent. All unbent, mazed people are jolty. All unbent, grungy people are pouchlike. If Hanny is mazed then Hanny is jolty. If someone is unbent then they are mazed. If someone is pouchlike and jolty then they are grungy. If someone is mazed and fortified then they are pouchlike. If Vanny is jolty then Vanny is unbent. All fortified people are unbent. Vanny is not pouchlike.", "logic": "\nJolty(arnoldo)\nFortified(hanny)\nJolty(vanny)\nUnbent(trace)\nforall x (Unbent(x) and Mazed(x) -> Jolty(x))\nforall x (Unbent(x) and Grungy(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nMazed(hanny) -> Jolty(hanny)\nforall x (Unbent(x) -> Mazed(x))\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) and Jolty(x) -> Grungy(x))\nforall x (Mazed(x) and Fortified(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nJolty(vanny) -> Unbent(vanny)\nforall x (Fortified(x) -> Unbent(x))\n\nnot Pouchlike(vanny)\n\nforall x (Unbent(x) and Grungy(x) -> Pouchlike(x)) <- forall x (Pouchlike(x) and Jolty(x) -> Grungy(x)) <- forall x (Mazed(x) and Fortified(x) -> Pouchlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Remy is canonist. Monique is outside. Venita is canonist. Logan is undefeated. All undefeated, migrant people are canonist. All undefeated, grassroots people are apiarian. If Monique is migrant then Monique is canonist. If someone is undefeated then they are migrant. If someone is apiarian and canonist then they are grassroots. If someone is migrant and outside then they are apiarian. If Venita is canonist then Venita is undefeated. All outside people are undefeated. Venita is outside.", "logic": "\nCanonist(remy)\nOutside(monique)\nCanonist(venita)\nUndefeated(logan)\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and Migrant(x) -> Canonist(x))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and Grassroots(x) -> Apiarian(x))\nMigrant(monique) -> Canonist(monique)\nforall x (Undefeated(x) -> Migrant(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) and Canonist(x) -> Grassroots(x))\nforall x (Migrant(x) and Outside(x) -> Apiarian(x))\nCanonist(venita) -> Undefeated(venita)\nforall x (Outside(x) -> Undefeated(x))\n\nOutside(venita)\n\nOutside(venita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Gerrie is motional. Kania is rapt. Dewey is motional. Stillman is allopathic. All allopathic, vitreous people are motional. All allopathic, garbled people are wounded. If Kania is vitreous then Kania is motional. If someone is allopathic then they are vitreous. If someone is wounded and motional then they are garbled. If someone is vitreous and rapt then they are wounded. If Dewey is motional then Dewey is allopathic. All rapt people are allopathic. Gerrie is not rapt.", "logic": "\nMotional(gerrie)\nRapt(kania)\nMotional(dewey)\nAllopathic(stillman)\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Vitreous(x) -> Motional(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Garbled(x) -> Wounded(x))\nVitreous(kania) -> Motional(kania)\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Vitreous(x))\nforall x (Wounded(x) and Motional(x) -> Garbled(x))\nforall x (Vitreous(x) and Rapt(x) -> Wounded(x))\nMotional(dewey) -> Allopathic(dewey)\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Allopathic(x))\n\nnot Rapt(gerrie)\n\nnot Rapt(gerrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Ilsa is polyphase. Brett is folding. Rodrick is polyphase. Mustafa is pumped. All pumped, larger people are polyphase. All pumped, speaking people are histologic. If Brett is larger then Brett is polyphase. If someone is pumped then they are larger. If someone is histologic and polyphase then they are speaking. If someone is larger and folding then they are histologic. If Rodrick is polyphase then Rodrick is pumped. All folding people are pumped. Mustafa is folding.", "logic": "\nPolyphase(ilsa)\nFolding(brett)\nPolyphase(rodrick)\nPumped(mustafa)\nforall x (Pumped(x) and Larger(x) -> Polyphase(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) and Speaking(x) -> Histologic(x))\nLarger(brett) -> Polyphase(brett)\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> Larger(x))\nforall x (Histologic(x) and Polyphase(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Larger(x) and Folding(x) -> Histologic(x))\nPolyphase(rodrick) -> Pumped(rodrick)\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Pumped(x))\n\nFolding(mustafa)\n\nFolding(mustafa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The verge is untucked. The verge restart the garfinkel. The verge toil the garfinkel. The garfinkel configure the verge. The garfinkel is not clathrate. The garfinkel is esthetic. The garfinkel does not need the verge. If something is unpaved then it is esthetic. If something configure the verge then the verge restart the garfinkel. All untucked things are unpaved. The verge restart the garfinkel.", "logic": "\nUntucked(verge)\nRestart(verge, garfinkel)\nToil(verge, garfinkel)\nConfigure(garfinkel, verge)\nnot Clathrate(garfinkel)\nEsthetic(garfinkel)\nnot Restart(garfinkel, verge)\nforall x (Unpaved(x) -> Esthetic(x))\nforall x (Configure(x, verge) -> Restart(verge, garfinkel))\nforall x (Untucked(x) -> Unpaved(x))\n\nRestart(verge, garfinkel)\n\ntherefore Restart(verge, garfinkel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The tonie is draconian. The tonie languish the dorrie. The tonie sleek the dorrie. The dorrie poleax the tonie. The dorrie is not dermic. The dorrie is careworn. The dorrie does not need the tonie. If something is unneurotic then it is careworn. If something poleax the tonie then the tonie languish the dorrie. All draconian things are unneurotic. The tonie does not visit the dorrie.", "logic": "\nDraconian(tonie)\nLanguish(tonie, dorrie)\nSleek(tonie, dorrie)\nPoleax(dorrie, tonie)\nnot Dermic(dorrie)\nCareworn(dorrie)\nnot Languish(dorrie, tonie)\nforall x (Unneurotic(x) -> Careworn(x))\nforall x (Poleax(x, tonie) -> Languish(tonie, dorrie))\nforall x (Draconian(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\n\nnot Sleek(tonie, dorrie)\n\ntherefore Sleek(tonie, dorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The aleen is identical. The aleen snuggle the welch. The aleen cicatrise the welch. The welch bewilder the aleen. The welch is not dishonest. The welch is holozoic. The welch does not need the aleen. If something is practiced then it is holozoic. If something bewilder the aleen then the aleen snuggle the welch. All identical things are practiced. The aleen is practiced.", "logic": "\nIdentical(aleen)\nSnuggle(aleen, welch)\nCicatrise(aleen, welch)\nBewilder(welch, aleen)\nnot Dishonest(welch)\nHolozoic(welch)\nnot Snuggle(welch, aleen)\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Bewilder(x, aleen) -> Snuggle(aleen, welch))\nforall x (Identical(x) -> Practiced(x))\n\nPracticed(aleen)\n\nIdentical(aleen) and forall x (Identical(x) -> Practiced(x)) -> therefore Practiced(aleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The remus is guttural. The remus daze the dolli. The remus intimate the dolli. The dolli swindle the remus. The dolli is not chaste. The dolli is antebellum. The dolli does not need the remus. If something is bodacious then it is antebellum. If something swindle the remus then the remus daze the dolli. All guttural things are bodacious. The remus is not bodacious.", "logic": "\nGuttural(remus)\nDaze(remus, dolli)\nIntimate(remus, dolli)\nSwindle(dolli, remus)\nnot Chaste(dolli)\nAntebellum(dolli)\nnot Daze(dolli, remus)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Antebellum(x))\nforall x (Swindle(x, remus) -> Daze(remus, dolli))\nforall x (Guttural(x) -> Bodacious(x))\n\nnot Bodacious(remus)\n\nGuttural(remus) and forall x (Guttural(x) -> Bodacious(x)) -> therefore Bodacious(remus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The ethelbert is adjustable. The ethelbert disbelieve the gabrila. The ethelbert overtrump the gabrila. The gabrila nauseate the ethelbert. The gabrila is not xxiii. The gabrila is canonist. The gabrila does not need the ethelbert. If something is mislabeled then it is canonist. If something nauseate the ethelbert then the ethelbert disbelieve the gabrila. All adjustable things are mislabeled. The ethelbert is canonist.", "logic": "\nAdjustable(ethelbert)\nDisbelieve(ethelbert, gabrila)\nOvertrump(ethelbert, gabrila)\nNauseate(gabrila, ethelbert)\nnot Xxiii(gabrila)\nCanonist(gabrila)\nnot Disbelieve(gabrila, ethelbert)\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Canonist(x))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, ethelbert) -> Disbelieve(ethelbert, gabrila))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\n\nCanonist(ethelbert)\n\nAdjustable(ethelbert) and forall x (Adjustable(x) -> Mislabeled(x)) -> therefore Mislabeled(ethelbert) Mislabeled(ethelbert) and forall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Canonist(x)) -> therefore Canonist(ethelbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The tiffani is medium. The tiffani glitter the arabela. The tiffani playact the arabela. The arabela shoetree the tiffani. The arabela is not disjointed. The arabela is estrogenic. The arabela does not need the tiffani. If something is assonant then it is estrogenic. If something shoetree the tiffani then the tiffani glitter the arabela. All medium things are assonant. The tiffani is not estrogenic.", "logic": "\nMedium(tiffani)\nGlitter(tiffani, arabela)\nPlayact(tiffani, arabela)\nShoetree(arabela, tiffani)\nnot Disjointed(arabela)\nEstrogenic(arabela)\nnot Glitter(arabela, tiffani)\nforall x (Assonant(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Shoetree(x, tiffani) -> Glitter(tiffani, arabela))\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Assonant(x))\n\nnot Estrogenic(tiffani)\n\nMedium(tiffani) and forall x (Medium(x) -> Assonant(x)) -> therefore Assonant(tiffani) Assonant(tiffani) and forall x (Assonant(x) -> Estrogenic(x)) -> therefore Estrogenic(tiffani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The tab is hired. The tab desorb the maggi. The tab subjugate the maggi. The maggi spotweld the tab. The maggi is not reviving. The maggi is periwigged. The maggi does not need the tab. If something is amenable then it is periwigged. If something spotweld the tab then the tab desorb the maggi. All hired things are amenable. The maggi is not amenable.", "logic": "\nHired(tab)\nDesorb(tab, maggi)\nSubjugate(tab, maggi)\nSpotweld(maggi, tab)\nnot Reviving(maggi)\nPeriwigged(maggi)\nnot Desorb(maggi, tab)\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Periwigged(x))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, tab) -> Desorb(tab, maggi))\nforall x (Hired(x) -> Amenable(x))\n\nnot Amenable(maggi)\n\nforall x (Hired(x) -> Amenable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The celesta is injectable. The celesta hone the carolin. The celesta overgrow the carolin. The carolin ticket the celesta. The carolin is not dappled. The carolin is faded. The carolin does not need the celesta. If something is lunate then it is faded. If something ticket the celesta then the celesta hone the carolin. All injectable things are lunate. The celesta ticket the carolin.", "logic": "\nInjectable(celesta)\nHone(celesta, carolin)\nOvergrow(celesta, carolin)\nTicket(carolin, celesta)\nnot Dappled(carolin)\nFaded(carolin)\nnot Hone(carolin, celesta)\nforall x (Lunate(x) -> Faded(x))\nforall x (Ticket(x, celesta) -> Hone(celesta, carolin))\nforall x (Injectable(x) -> Lunate(x))\n\nTicket(celesta, carolin)\n\nTicket(celesta, carolin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The germaine is evaluative. The germaine bobsled the natalya. The germaine demulsify the natalya. The natalya skank the germaine. The natalya is not assigned. The natalya is somber. The natalya does not need the germaine. If something is uppermost then it is somber. If something skank the germaine then the germaine bobsled the natalya. All evaluative things are uppermost. The natalya does not visit the germaine.", "logic": "\nEvaluative(germaine)\nBobsled(germaine, natalya)\nDemulsify(germaine, natalya)\nSkank(natalya, germaine)\nnot Assigned(natalya)\nSomber(natalya)\nnot Bobsled(natalya, germaine)\nforall x (Uppermost(x) -> Somber(x))\nforall x (Skank(x, germaine) -> Bobsled(germaine, natalya))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Uppermost(x))\n\nnot Demulsify(natalya, germaine)\n\nnot Demulsify(natalya, germaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The kora is squiffy. The kora honeycomb the upton. The kora condole the upton. The upton price the kora. The upton is not xxiv. The upton is anapaestic. The upton does not need the kora. If something is shocked then it is anapaestic. If something price the kora then the kora honeycomb the upton. All squiffy things are shocked. The kora condole the kora.", "logic": "\nSquiffy(kora)\nHoneycomb(kora, upton)\nCondole(kora, upton)\nPrice(upton, kora)\nnot Xxiv(upton)\nAnapaestic(upton)\nnot Honeycomb(upton, kora)\nforall x (Shocked(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Price(x, kora) -> Honeycomb(kora, upton))\nforall x (Squiffy(x) -> Shocked(x))\n\nCondole(kora, kora)\n\nCondole(kora, kora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The carola is dissolute. The carola bituminize the lamar. The carola sinter the lamar. The lamar bully the carola. The lamar is not quickset. The lamar is uncapped. The lamar does not need the carola. If something is canine then it is uncapped. If something bully the carola then the carola bituminize the lamar. All dissolute things are canine. The lamar does not need the lamar.", "logic": "\nDissolute(carola)\nBituminize(carola, lamar)\nSinter(carola, lamar)\nBully(lamar, carola)\nnot Quickset(lamar)\nUncapped(lamar)\nnot Bituminize(lamar, carola)\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Bully(x, carola) -> Bituminize(carola, lamar))\nforall x (Dissolute(x) -> Canine(x))\n\nnot Bituminize(lamar, lamar)\n\nnot Bituminize(lamar, lamar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "The somerset is secure. The somerset thrive the krystalle. The somerset expect the krystalle. The krystalle consider the somerset. The krystalle is not eidetic. The krystalle is wanting. The krystalle does not need the somerset. If something is amort then it is wanting. If something consider the somerset then the somerset thrive the krystalle. All secure things are amort. The krystalle expect the krystalle.", "logic": "\nSecure(somerset)\nThrive(somerset, krystalle)\nExpect(somerset, krystalle)\nConsider(krystalle, somerset)\nnot Eidetic(krystalle)\nWanting(krystalle)\nnot Thrive(krystalle, somerset)\nforall x (Amort(x) -> Wanting(x))\nforall x (Consider(x, somerset) -> Thrive(somerset, krystalle))\nforall x (Secure(x) -> Amort(x))\n\nExpect(krystalle, krystalle)\n\nExpect(krystalle, krystalle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1752"} {"premises": "Marna is groovy. Pat is leery. Caril is fretful. Jeremiah is not grasslike. If something is leery then it is not palpatory. White, sinuous things are not grasslike. All fretful things are leery. If something is fretful and not barbed then it is sinuous. Young things are groovy. If something is sinuous and not grasslike then it is groovy. Pat is leery.", "logic": "\nGroovy(marna)\nLeery(pat)\nFretful(caril)\nnot Grasslike(jeremiah)\nforall x (Leery(x) -> not Palpatory(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Sinuous(x) -> not Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Fretful(x) -> Leery(x))\nforall x (Fretful(x) and not Barbed(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Groovy(x))\nforall x (Sinuous(x) and not Grasslike(x) -> Groovy(x))\n\nLeery(pat)\n\ntherefore Leery(pat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Forster is credible. Nerta is frowning. Addie is unbeatable. Mylo is not flaunty. If something is frowning then it is not moderne. White, rugged things are not flaunty. All unbeatable things are frowning. If something is unbeatable and not gutless then it is rugged. Young things are credible. If something is rugged and not flaunty then it is credible. Addie is not unbeatable.", "logic": "\nCredible(forster)\nFrowning(nerta)\nUnbeatable(addie)\nnot Flaunty(mylo)\nforall x (Frowning(x) -> not Moderne(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) and Rugged(x) -> not Flaunty(x))\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) -> Frowning(x))\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) and not Gutless(x) -> Rugged(x))\nforall x (Flaunty(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) and not Flaunty(x) -> Credible(x))\n\nnot Unbeatable(addie)\n\ntherefore Unbeatable(addie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Petrina is spiffing. Kirbee is stomachic. Kerstin is unendowed. Sidonia is not unalloyed. If something is stomachic then it is not blinding. White, paroicous things are not unalloyed. All unendowed things are stomachic. If something is unendowed and not plumlike then it is paroicous. Young things are spiffing. If something is paroicous and not unalloyed then it is spiffing. Kerstin is stomachic.", "logic": "\nSpiffing(petrina)\nStomachic(kirbee)\nUnendowed(kerstin)\nnot Unalloyed(sidonia)\nforall x (Stomachic(x) -> not Blinding(x))\nforall x (Blinding(x) and Paroicous(x) -> not Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Unendowed(x) -> Stomachic(x))\nforall x (Unendowed(x) and not Plumlike(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nforall x (Paroicous(x) and not Unalloyed(x) -> Spiffing(x))\n\nStomachic(kerstin)\n\nUnendowed(kerstin) and forall x (Unendowed(x) -> Stomachic(x)) -> therefore Stomachic(kerstin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Alexis is sibylline. Jolynn is allopathic. Salvidor is inimical. Emanuela is not receptive. If something is allopathic then it is not squarish. White, coaxal things are not receptive. All inimical things are allopathic. If something is inimical and not corymbose then it is coaxal. Young things are sibylline. If something is coaxal and not receptive then it is sibylline. Salvidor is not allopathic.", "logic": "\nSibylline(alexis)\nAllopathic(jolynn)\nInimical(salvidor)\nnot Receptive(emanuela)\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> not Squarish(x))\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Coaxal(x) -> not Receptive(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and not Corymbose(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Receptive(x) -> Sibylline(x))\nforall x (Coaxal(x) and not Receptive(x) -> Sibylline(x))\n\nnot Allopathic(salvidor)\n\nInimical(salvidor) and forall x (Inimical(x) -> Allopathic(x)) -> therefore Allopathic(salvidor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Fabio is pallid. Mordecai is jingoistic. Zelma is engraved. Rice is not medusoid. If something is jingoistic then it is not synoptic. White, lotic things are not medusoid. All engraved things are jingoistic. If something is engraved and not incidental then it is lotic. Young things are pallid. If something is lotic and not medusoid then it is pallid. Zelma is not synoptic.", "logic": "\nPallid(fabio)\nJingoistic(mordecai)\nEngraved(zelma)\nnot Medusoid(rice)\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) -> not Synoptic(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and Lotic(x) -> not Medusoid(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) and not Incidental(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) -> Pallid(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) and not Medusoid(x) -> Pallid(x))\n\nnot Synoptic(zelma)\n\nEngraved(zelma) and forall x (Engraved(x) -> Jingoistic(x)) -> therefore Jingoistic(zelma) Jingoistic(zelma) and forall x (Jingoistic(x) -> not Synoptic(x)) -> therefore not Synoptic(zelma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Leeann is tasseled. Audra is horrendous. Johann is soundable. Sada is not slighting. If something is horrendous then it is not just. White, silklike things are not slighting. All soundable things are horrendous. If something is soundable and not amerciable then it is silklike. Young things are tasseled. If something is silklike and not slighting then it is tasseled. Johann is just.", "logic": "\nTasseled(leeann)\nHorrendous(audra)\nSoundable(johann)\nnot Slighting(sada)\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> not Just(x))\nforall x (Just(x) and Silklike(x) -> not Slighting(x))\nforall x (Soundable(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Soundable(x) and not Amerciable(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Slighting(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Silklike(x) and not Slighting(x) -> Tasseled(x))\n\nJust(johann)\n\nSoundable(johann) and forall x (Soundable(x) -> Horrendous(x)) -> therefore Horrendous(johann) Horrendous(johann) and forall x (Horrendous(x) -> not Just(x)) -> therefore not Just(johann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Yelena is front. Nola is trichrome. Mathilda is overlooked. Shaun is not delicate. If something is trichrome then it is not designate. White, limber things are not delicate. All overlooked things are trichrome. If something is overlooked and not cubist then it is limber. Young things are front. If something is limber and not delicate then it is front. Yelena is not limber.", "logic": "\nFront(yelena)\nTrichrome(nola)\nOverlooked(mathilda)\nnot Delicate(shaun)\nforall x (Trichrome(x) -> not Designate(x))\nforall x (Designate(x) and Limber(x) -> not Delicate(x))\nforall x (Overlooked(x) -> Trichrome(x))\nforall x (Overlooked(x) and not Cubist(x) -> Limber(x))\nforall x (Delicate(x) -> Front(x))\nforall x (Limber(x) and not Delicate(x) -> Front(x))\n\nnot Limber(yelena)\n\nforall x (Overlooked(x) and not Cubist(x) -> Limber(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Wilow is affine. Mortimer is bichrome. Rochester is vulgar. Mara is not ravishing. If something is bichrome then it is not pickled. White, arawakan things are not ravishing. All vulgar things are bichrome. If something is vulgar and not yucky then it is arawakan. Young things are affine. If something is arawakan and not ravishing then it is affine. Mara is bichrome.", "logic": "\nAffine(wilow)\nBichrome(mortimer)\nVulgar(rochester)\nnot Ravishing(mara)\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> not Pickled(x))\nforall x (Pickled(x) and Arawakan(x) -> not Ravishing(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Bichrome(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) and not Yucky(x) -> Arawakan(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) -> Affine(x))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) and not Ravishing(x) -> Affine(x))\n\nBichrome(mara)\n\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Bichrome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Rollins is rectal. Elliot is laotian. Uta is bulgarian. Cherye is not repetitive. If something is laotian then it is not countable. White, nucleate things are not repetitive. All bulgarian things are laotian. If something is bulgarian and not sagittal then it is nucleate. Young things are rectal. If something is nucleate and not repetitive then it is rectal. Rollins is not laotian.", "logic": "\nRectal(rollins)\nLaotian(elliot)\nBulgarian(uta)\nnot Repetitive(cherye)\nforall x (Laotian(x) -> not Countable(x))\nforall x (Countable(x) and Nucleate(x) -> not Repetitive(x))\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) -> Laotian(x))\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) and not Sagittal(x) -> Nucleate(x))\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> Rectal(x))\nforall x (Nucleate(x) and not Repetitive(x) -> Rectal(x))\n\nnot Laotian(rollins)\n\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) -> Laotian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Augie is indian. Kelwin is sounding. Regine is yawning. Brendan is not sulky. If something is sounding then it is not severe. White, uncolored things are not sulky. All yawning things are sounding. If something is yawning and not grave then it is uncolored. Young things are indian. If something is uncolored and not sulky then it is indian. Augie is sulky.", "logic": "\nIndian(augie)\nSounding(kelwin)\nYawning(regine)\nnot Sulky(brendan)\nforall x (Sounding(x) -> not Severe(x))\nforall x (Severe(x) and Uncolored(x) -> not Sulky(x))\nforall x (Yawning(x) -> Sounding(x))\nforall x (Yawning(x) and not Grave(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Indian(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and not Sulky(x) -> Indian(x))\n\nSulky(augie)\n\nSulky(augie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Andriana is voguish. Tobiah is sisterlike. Nomi is sinhala. Jacki is not spirituous. If something is sisterlike then it is not gabled. White, actinic things are not spirituous. All sinhala things are sisterlike. If something is sinhala and not fabulous then it is actinic. Young things are voguish. If something is actinic and not spirituous then it is voguish. Jacki is not fabulous.", "logic": "\nVoguish(andriana)\nSisterlike(tobiah)\nSinhala(nomi)\nnot Spirituous(jacki)\nforall x (Sisterlike(x) -> not Gabled(x))\nforall x (Gabled(x) and Actinic(x) -> not Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Sisterlike(x))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) and not Fabulous(x) -> Actinic(x))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> Voguish(x))\nforall x (Actinic(x) and not Spirituous(x) -> Voguish(x))\n\nnot Fabulous(jacki)\n\nnot Fabulous(jacki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Alidia is milch. Brenn is bastardly. Brewster is outspoken. Francesco is not underage. If something is bastardly then it is not patched. White, diaphanous things are not underage. All outspoken things are bastardly. If something is outspoken and not humourless then it is diaphanous. Young things are milch. If something is diaphanous and not underage then it is milch. Francesco is outspoken.", "logic": "\nMilch(alidia)\nBastardly(brenn)\nOutspoken(brewster)\nnot Underage(francesco)\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> not Patched(x))\nforall x (Patched(x) and Diaphanous(x) -> not Underage(x))\nforall x (Outspoken(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Outspoken(x) and not Humourless(x) -> Diaphanous(x))\nforall x (Underage(x) -> Milch(x))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) and not Underage(x) -> Milch(x))\n\nOutspoken(francesco)\n\nOutspoken(francesco) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-305"} {"premises": "Martino is menstrual. If Martino is lithe then Martino is juxtaposed. If Martino is kitschy then Martino is juxtaposed. Smart things are limbless. All juxtaposed, kitschy things are menstrual. If Martino is menstrual then Martino is kitschy. If something is juxtaposed and not limbless then it is weblike. Martino is menstrual.", "logic": "\nMenstrual(martino)\nLithe(martino) -> Juxtaposed(martino)\nKitschy(martino) -> Juxtaposed(martino)\nforall x (Menstrual(x) -> Limbless(x))\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) and Kitschy(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nMenstrual(martino) -> Kitschy(martino)\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) and not Limbless(x) -> Weblike(x))\n\nMenstrual(martino)\n\ntherefore Menstrual(martino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Lenard is parked. If Lenard is flameproof then Lenard is patterned. If Lenard is periodic then Lenard is patterned. Smart things are ninepenny. All patterned, periodic things are parked. If Lenard is parked then Lenard is periodic. If something is patterned and not ninepenny then it is actinal. Lenard is not parked.", "logic": "\nParked(lenard)\nFlameproof(lenard) -> Patterned(lenard)\nPeriodic(lenard) -> Patterned(lenard)\nforall x (Parked(x) -> Ninepenny(x))\nforall x (Patterned(x) and Periodic(x) -> Parked(x))\nParked(lenard) -> Periodic(lenard)\nforall x (Patterned(x) and not Ninepenny(x) -> Actinal(x))\n\nnot Parked(lenard)\n\ntherefore Parked(lenard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Nelle is aglow. If Nelle is changeful then Nelle is central. If Nelle is homely then Nelle is central. Smart things are branchial. All central, homely things are aglow. If Nelle is aglow then Nelle is homely. If something is central and not branchial then it is haematic. Nelle is homely.", "logic": "\nAglow(nelle)\nChangeful(nelle) -> Central(nelle)\nHomely(nelle) -> Central(nelle)\nforall x (Aglow(x) -> Branchial(x))\nforall x (Central(x) and Homely(x) -> Aglow(x))\nAglow(nelle) -> Homely(nelle)\nforall x (Central(x) and not Branchial(x) -> Haematic(x))\n\nHomely(nelle)\n\nAglow(nelle) and Aglow(nelle) -> Homely(nelle) -> therefore Homely(nelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Delila is faded. If Delila is omnibus then Delila is zionist. If Delila is bionomic then Delila is zionist. Smart things are angolan. All zionist, bionomic things are faded. If Delila is faded then Delila is bionomic. If something is zionist and not angolan then it is albinic. Delila is not angolan.", "logic": "\nFaded(delila)\nOmnibus(delila) -> Zionist(delila)\nBionomic(delila) -> Zionist(delila)\nforall x (Faded(x) -> Angolan(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) and Bionomic(x) -> Faded(x))\nFaded(delila) -> Bionomic(delila)\nforall x (Zionist(x) and not Angolan(x) -> Albinic(x))\n\nnot Angolan(delila)\n\nFaded(delila) and forall x (Faded(x) -> Angolan(x)) -> therefore Angolan(delila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Cyndy is intriguing. If Cyndy is trilobated then Cyndy is unhumorous. If Cyndy is pseudo then Cyndy is unhumorous. Smart things are unhewn. All unhumorous, pseudo things are intriguing. If Cyndy is intriguing then Cyndy is pseudo. If something is unhumorous and not unhewn then it is trihydroxy. Cyndy is unhumorous.", "logic": "\nIntriguing(cyndy)\nTrilobated(cyndy) -> Unhumorous(cyndy)\nPseudo(cyndy) -> Unhumorous(cyndy)\nforall x (Intriguing(x) -> Unhewn(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) and Pseudo(x) -> Intriguing(x))\nIntriguing(cyndy) -> Pseudo(cyndy)\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) and not Unhewn(x) -> Trihydroxy(x))\n\nUnhumorous(cyndy)\n\nIntriguing(cyndy) and Intriguing(cyndy) -> Pseudo(cyndy) -> therefore Pseudo(cyndy) Pseudo(cyndy) and Pseudo(cyndy) -> Unhumorous(cyndy) -> therefore Unhumorous(cyndy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Lawson is stilted. If Lawson is tethered then Lawson is futuristic. If Lawson is wolflike then Lawson is futuristic. Smart things are discoid. All futuristic, wolflike things are stilted. If Lawson is stilted then Lawson is wolflike. If something is futuristic and not discoid then it is sabine. Lawson is not futuristic.", "logic": "\nStilted(lawson)\nTethered(lawson) -> Futuristic(lawson)\nWolflike(lawson) -> Futuristic(lawson)\nforall x (Stilted(x) -> Discoid(x))\nforall x (Futuristic(x) and Wolflike(x) -> Stilted(x))\nStilted(lawson) -> Wolflike(lawson)\nforall x (Futuristic(x) and not Discoid(x) -> Sabine(x))\n\nnot Futuristic(lawson)\n\nStilted(lawson) and Stilted(lawson) -> Wolflike(lawson) -> therefore Wolflike(lawson) Wolflike(lawson) and Wolflike(lawson) -> Futuristic(lawson) -> therefore Futuristic(lawson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Lolly is largo. If Lolly is acetonic then Lolly is campestral. If Lolly is unhelpful then Lolly is campestral. Smart things are eupneic. All campestral, unhelpful things are largo. If Lolly is largo then Lolly is unhelpful. If something is campestral and not eupneic then it is answerable. Lolly is not answerable.", "logic": "\nLargo(lolly)\nAcetonic(lolly) -> Campestral(lolly)\nUnhelpful(lolly) -> Campestral(lolly)\nforall x (Largo(x) -> Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Campestral(x) and Unhelpful(x) -> Largo(x))\nLargo(lolly) -> Unhelpful(lolly)\nforall x (Campestral(x) and not Eupneic(x) -> Answerable(x))\n\nnot Answerable(lolly)\n\nforall x (Campestral(x) and not Eupneic(x) -> Answerable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Barnie is dreary. If Barnie is nonmodern then Barnie is rewarding. If Barnie is unworldly then Barnie is rewarding. Smart things are aleuronic. All rewarding, unworldly things are dreary. If Barnie is dreary then Barnie is unworldly. If something is rewarding and not aleuronic then it is dappled. Barnie is cold.", "logic": "\nDreary(barnie)\nNonmodern(barnie) -> Rewarding(barnie)\nUnworldly(barnie) -> Rewarding(barnie)\nforall x (Dreary(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nforall x (Rewarding(x) and Unworldly(x) -> Dreary(x))\nDreary(barnie) -> Unworldly(barnie)\nforall x (Rewarding(x) and not Aleuronic(x) -> Dappled(x))\n\nCold(barnie)\n\nCold(barnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-521"} {"premises": "Barbi is leaved. Barbi is controlled. Barbi is laughing. White, trivalent things are not leaved. If something is controlled and not trivalent then it is not wizardly. If something is controlled then it is wizardly. If Barbi is laughing then Barbi is leaved. If something is wizardly and not trivalent then it is controlled. If something is wizardly then it is overbusy. If something is braggart then it is overbusy. If something is braggart and not wizardly then it is not overbusy. Barbi is controlled.", "logic": "\nLeaved(barbi)\nControlled(barbi)\nLaughing(barbi)\nforall x (Wizardly(x) and Trivalent(x) -> not Leaved(x))\nforall x (Controlled(x) and not Trivalent(x) -> not Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Controlled(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nLaughing(barbi) -> Leaved(barbi)\nforall x (Wizardly(x) and not Trivalent(x) -> Controlled(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Overbusy(x))\nforall x (Braggart(x) -> Overbusy(x))\nforall x (Braggart(x) and not Wizardly(x) -> not Overbusy(x))\n\nControlled(barbi)\n\ntherefore Controlled(barbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "Rochester is preferable. Rochester is dented. Rochester is statuesque. White, guileless things are not preferable. If something is dented and not guileless then it is not beautiful. If something is dented then it is beautiful. If Rochester is statuesque then Rochester is preferable. If something is beautiful and not guileless then it is dented. If something is beautiful then it is orientated. If something is brassy then it is orientated. If something is brassy and not beautiful then it is not orientated. Rochester is not preferable.", "logic": "\nPreferable(rochester)\nDented(rochester)\nStatuesque(rochester)\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and Guileless(x) -> not Preferable(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) and not Guileless(x) -> not Beautiful(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Beautiful(x))\nStatuesque(rochester) -> Preferable(rochester)\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and not Guileless(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Orientated(x))\nforall x (Brassy(x) -> Orientated(x))\nforall x (Brassy(x) and not Beautiful(x) -> not Orientated(x))\n\nnot Preferable(rochester)\n\ntherefore Preferable(rochester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "Moina is earnest. Moina is obliging. Moina is wolflike. White, plutonic things are not earnest. If something is obliging and not plutonic then it is not unvoiced. If something is obliging then it is unvoiced. If Moina is wolflike then Moina is earnest. If something is unvoiced and not plutonic then it is obliging. If something is unvoiced then it is geometric. If something is scalelike then it is geometric. If something is scalelike and not unvoiced then it is not geometric. Moina is unvoiced.", "logic": "\nEarnest(moina)\nObliging(moina)\nWolflike(moina)\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) and Plutonic(x) -> not Earnest(x))\nforall x (Obliging(x) and not Plutonic(x) -> not Unvoiced(x))\nforall x (Obliging(x) -> Unvoiced(x))\nWolflike(moina) -> Earnest(moina)\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) and not Plutonic(x) -> Obliging(x))\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) -> Geometric(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Geometric(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) and not Unvoiced(x) -> not Geometric(x))\n\nUnvoiced(moina)\n\nObliging(moina) and forall x (Obliging(x) -> Unvoiced(x)) -> therefore Unvoiced(moina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "Clint is seismic. Clint is regressive. Clint is unsleeping. White, fleeting things are not seismic. If something is regressive and not fleeting then it is not caucasian. If something is regressive then it is caucasian. If Clint is unsleeping then Clint is seismic. If something is caucasian and not fleeting then it is regressive. If something is caucasian then it is unsavoury. If something is vasomotor then it is unsavoury. If something is vasomotor and not caucasian then it is not unsavoury. Clint is not caucasian.", "logic": "\nSeismic(clint)\nRegressive(clint)\nUnsleeping(clint)\nforall x (Caucasian(x) and Fleeting(x) -> not Seismic(x))\nforall x (Regressive(x) and not Fleeting(x) -> not Caucasian(x))\nforall x (Regressive(x) -> Caucasian(x))\nUnsleeping(clint) -> Seismic(clint)\nforall x (Caucasian(x) and not Fleeting(x) -> Regressive(x))\nforall x (Caucasian(x) -> Unsavoury(x))\nforall x (Vasomotor(x) -> Unsavoury(x))\nforall x (Vasomotor(x) and not Caucasian(x) -> not Unsavoury(x))\n\nnot Caucasian(clint)\n\nRegressive(clint) and forall x (Regressive(x) -> Caucasian(x)) -> therefore Caucasian(clint)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "Ianthe is flickering. Ianthe is anesthetic. Ianthe is diurnal. White, parthian things are not flickering. If something is anesthetic and not parthian then it is not prolific. If something is anesthetic then it is prolific. If Ianthe is diurnal then Ianthe is flickering. If something is prolific and not parthian then it is anesthetic. If something is prolific then it is collinear. If something is unbaptised then it is collinear. If something is unbaptised and not prolific then it is not collinear. Ianthe is collinear.", "logic": "\nFlickering(ianthe)\nAnesthetic(ianthe)\nDiurnal(ianthe)\nforall x (Prolific(x) and Parthian(x) -> not Flickering(x))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) and not Parthian(x) -> not Prolific(x))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Prolific(x))\nDiurnal(ianthe) -> Flickering(ianthe)\nforall x (Prolific(x) and not Parthian(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nforall x (Prolific(x) -> Collinear(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Collinear(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and not Prolific(x) -> not Collinear(x))\n\nCollinear(ianthe)\n\nAnesthetic(ianthe) and forall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Prolific(x)) -> therefore Prolific(ianthe) Prolific(ianthe) and forall x (Prolific(x) -> Collinear(x)) -> therefore Collinear(ianthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "Alexine is casual. Alexine is wooded. Alexine is ethereal. White, towering things are not casual. If something is wooded and not towering then it is not anisogamic. If something is wooded then it is anisogamic. If Alexine is ethereal then Alexine is casual. If something is anisogamic and not towering then it is wooded. If something is anisogamic then it is unshaded. If something is ateleiotic then it is unshaded. If something is ateleiotic and not anisogamic then it is not unshaded. Alexine is not unshaded.", "logic": "\nCasual(alexine)\nWooded(alexine)\nEthereal(alexine)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Towering(x) -> not Casual(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) and not Towering(x) -> not Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nEthereal(alexine) -> Casual(alexine)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and not Towering(x) -> Wooded(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Unshaded(x))\nforall x (Ateleiotic(x) -> Unshaded(x))\nforall x (Ateleiotic(x) and not Anisogamic(x) -> not Unshaded(x))\n\nnot Unshaded(alexine)\n\nWooded(alexine) and forall x (Wooded(x) -> Anisogamic(x)) -> therefore Anisogamic(alexine) Anisogamic(alexine) and forall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Unshaded(x)) -> therefore Unshaded(alexine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "Hamel is needlelike. Hamel is costate. Hamel is irresolute. White, deformed things are not needlelike. If something is costate and not deformed then it is not seared. If something is costate then it is seared. If Hamel is irresolute then Hamel is needlelike. If something is seared and not deformed then it is costate. If something is seared then it is oblate. If something is sulfurous then it is oblate. If something is sulfurous and not seared then it is not oblate. Hamel is not sulfurous.", "logic": "\nNeedlelike(hamel)\nCostate(hamel)\nIrresolute(hamel)\nforall x (Seared(x) and Deformed(x) -> not Needlelike(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) and not Deformed(x) -> not Seared(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) -> Seared(x))\nIrresolute(hamel) -> Needlelike(hamel)\nforall x (Seared(x) and not Deformed(x) -> Costate(x))\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Oblate(x))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Oblate(x))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) and not Seared(x) -> not Oblate(x))\n\nnot Sulfurous(hamel)\n\nnot Sulfurous(hamel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "Odell is elderly. Odell is ritenuto. Odell is forgotten. White, cohesive things are not elderly. If something is ritenuto and not cohesive then it is not boxed. If something is ritenuto then it is boxed. If Odell is forgotten then Odell is elderly. If something is boxed and not cohesive then it is ritenuto. If something is boxed then it is littered. If something is vaporous then it is littered. If something is vaporous and not boxed then it is not littered. Odell is cohesive.", "logic": "\nElderly(odell)\nRitenuto(odell)\nForgotten(odell)\nforall x (Boxed(x) and Cohesive(x) -> not Elderly(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) and not Cohesive(x) -> not Boxed(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) -> Boxed(x))\nForgotten(odell) -> Elderly(odell)\nforall x (Boxed(x) and not Cohesive(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\nforall x (Boxed(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) and not Boxed(x) -> not Littered(x))\n\nCohesive(odell)\n\nCohesive(odell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-357"} {"premises": "The laird mope the avie. The laird is ragged. The laird is curly. The laird digitalize the avie. The avie mope the laird. The avie is curly. The avie paganise the laird. All etched, ragged people are ahead. If someone is curly and they eat the laird then they are deadlocked. If someone digitalize the laird and the laird mope the avie then the avie digitalize the laird. If the avie paganise the laird then the laird paganise the avie. If someone mope the laird then the laird is ahead. Green people are etched. The avie paganise the laird.", "logic": "\nMope(laird, avie)\nRagged(laird)\nCurly(laird)\nDigitalize(laird, avie)\nMope(avie, laird)\nCurly(avie)\nPaganise(avie, laird)\nforall x (Etched(x) and Ragged(x) -> Ahead(x))\nforall x (Curly(x) and Mope(x, laird) -> Deadlocked(x))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, laird) and Mope(laird, avie) -> Digitalize(avie, laird))\nPaganise(avie, laird) -> Paganise(laird, avie)\nforall x (Mope(x, laird) -> Ahead(laird))\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> Etched(x))\n\nPaganise(avie, laird)\n\ntherefore Paganise(avie, laird)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The towney scram the chicky. The towney is raddled. The towney is eurasiatic. The towney acetylize the chicky. The chicky scram the towney. The chicky is eurasiatic. The chicky entrance the towney. All analgesic, raddled people are unvaried. If someone is eurasiatic and they eat the towney then they are exigent. If someone acetylize the towney and the towney scram the chicky then the chicky acetylize the towney. If the chicky entrance the towney then the towney entrance the chicky. If someone scram the towney then the towney is unvaried. Green people are analgesic. The towney is not raddled.", "logic": "\nScram(towney, chicky)\nRaddled(towney)\nEurasiatic(towney)\nAcetylize(towney, chicky)\nScram(chicky, towney)\nEurasiatic(chicky)\nEntrance(chicky, towney)\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and Raddled(x) -> Unvaried(x))\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) and Scram(x, towney) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Acetylize(x, towney) and Scram(towney, chicky) -> Acetylize(chicky, towney))\nEntrance(chicky, towney) -> Entrance(towney, chicky)\nforall x (Scram(x, towney) -> Unvaried(towney))\nforall x (Unvaried(x) -> Analgesic(x))\n\nnot Raddled(towney)\n\ntherefore Raddled(towney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The sabina glom the ange. The sabina is vain. The sabina is serous. The sabina laden the ange. The ange glom the sabina. The ange is serous. The ange terrorize the sabina. All gaussian, vain people are cerulean. If someone is serous and they eat the sabina then they are adorned. If someone laden the sabina and the sabina glom the ange then the ange laden the sabina. If the ange terrorize the sabina then the sabina terrorize the ange. If someone glom the sabina then the sabina is cerulean. Green people are gaussian. The sabina is cerulean.", "logic": "\nGlom(sabina, ange)\nVain(sabina)\nSerous(sabina)\nLaden(sabina, ange)\nGlom(ange, sabina)\nSerous(ange)\nTerrorize(ange, sabina)\nforall x (Gaussian(x) and Vain(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Serous(x) and Glom(x, sabina) -> Adorned(x))\nforall x (Laden(x, sabina) and Glom(sabina, ange) -> Laden(ange, sabina))\nTerrorize(ange, sabina) -> Terrorize(sabina, ange)\nforall x (Glom(x, sabina) -> Cerulean(sabina))\nforall x (Cerulean(x) -> Gaussian(x))\n\nCerulean(sabina)\n\nGlom(ange, sabina) and forall x (Glom(x, sabina) -> Cerulean(sabina)) -> therefore Cerulean(sabina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The ramsey theorise the marybeth. The ramsey is humdrum. The ramsey is licenced. The ramsey raft the marybeth. The marybeth theorise the ramsey. The marybeth is licenced. The marybeth legitimize the ramsey. All concluding, humdrum people are autogenic. If someone is licenced and they eat the ramsey then they are leptorhine. If someone raft the ramsey and the ramsey theorise the marybeth then the marybeth raft the ramsey. If the marybeth legitimize the ramsey then the ramsey legitimize the marybeth. If someone theorise the ramsey then the ramsey is autogenic. Green people are concluding. The ramsey does not visit the marybeth.", "logic": "\nTheorise(ramsey, marybeth)\nHumdrum(ramsey)\nLicenced(ramsey)\nRaft(ramsey, marybeth)\nTheorise(marybeth, ramsey)\nLicenced(marybeth)\nLegitimize(marybeth, ramsey)\nforall x (Concluding(x) and Humdrum(x) -> Autogenic(x))\nforall x (Licenced(x) and Theorise(x, ramsey) -> Leptorhine(x))\nforall x (Raft(x, ramsey) and Theorise(ramsey, marybeth) -> Raft(marybeth, ramsey))\nLegitimize(marybeth, ramsey) -> Legitimize(ramsey, marybeth)\nforall x (Theorise(x, ramsey) -> Autogenic(ramsey))\nforall x (Autogenic(x) -> Concluding(x))\n\nnot Legitimize(ramsey, marybeth)\n\nLegitimize(marybeth, ramsey) and Legitimize(marybeth, ramsey) -> Legitimize(ramsey, marybeth) -> therefore Legitimize(ramsey, marybeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The rory yawn the kizzee. The rory is normative. The rory is synclinal. The rory disgust the kizzee. The kizzee yawn the rory. The kizzee is synclinal. The kizzee refrain the rory. All sidelong, normative people are severed. If someone is synclinal and they eat the rory then they are publicized. If someone disgust the rory and the rory yawn the kizzee then the kizzee disgust the rory. If the kizzee refrain the rory then the rory refrain the kizzee. If someone yawn the rory then the rory is severed. Green people are sidelong. The rory is sidelong.", "logic": "\nYawn(rory, kizzee)\nNormative(rory)\nSynclinal(rory)\nDisgust(rory, kizzee)\nYawn(kizzee, rory)\nSynclinal(kizzee)\nRefrain(kizzee, rory)\nforall x (Sidelong(x) and Normative(x) -> Severed(x))\nforall x (Synclinal(x) and Yawn(x, rory) -> Publicized(x))\nforall x (Disgust(x, rory) and Yawn(rory, kizzee) -> Disgust(kizzee, rory))\nRefrain(kizzee, rory) -> Refrain(rory, kizzee)\nforall x (Yawn(x, rory) -> Severed(rory))\nforall x (Severed(x) -> Sidelong(x))\n\nSidelong(rory)\n\nYawn(kizzee, rory) and forall x (Yawn(x, rory) -> Severed(rory)) -> therefore Severed(rory) Severed(rory) and forall x (Severed(x) -> Sidelong(x)) -> therefore Sidelong(rory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The helga address the paulie. The helga is diminutive. The helga is fecal. The helga womanize the paulie. The paulie address the helga. The paulie is fecal. The paulie sinter the helga. All wooden, diminutive people are onomastic. If someone is fecal and they eat the helga then they are ghanian. If someone womanize the helga and the helga address the paulie then the paulie womanize the helga. If the paulie sinter the helga then the helga sinter the paulie. If someone address the helga then the helga is onomastic. Green people are wooden. The helga is not wooden.", "logic": "\nAddress(helga, paulie)\nDiminutive(helga)\nFecal(helga)\nWomanize(helga, paulie)\nAddress(paulie, helga)\nFecal(paulie)\nSinter(paulie, helga)\nforall x (Wooden(x) and Diminutive(x) -> Onomastic(x))\nforall x (Fecal(x) and Address(x, helga) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Womanize(x, helga) and Address(helga, paulie) -> Womanize(paulie, helga))\nSinter(paulie, helga) -> Sinter(helga, paulie)\nforall x (Address(x, helga) -> Onomastic(helga))\nforall x (Onomastic(x) -> Wooden(x))\n\nnot Wooden(helga)\n\nAddress(paulie, helga) and forall x (Address(x, helga) -> Onomastic(helga)) -> therefore Onomastic(helga) Onomastic(helga) and forall x (Onomastic(x) -> Wooden(x)) -> therefore Wooden(helga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The lavinie mosh the stearne. The lavinie is unblushing. The lavinie is timorese. The lavinie commingle the stearne. The stearne mosh the lavinie. The stearne is timorese. The stearne egest the lavinie. All bowlegged, unblushing people are kaput. If someone is timorese and they eat the lavinie then they are absolved. If someone commingle the lavinie and the lavinie mosh the stearne then the stearne commingle the lavinie. If the stearne egest the lavinie then the lavinie egest the stearne. If someone mosh the lavinie then the lavinie is kaput. Green people are bowlegged. The stearne is not bowlegged.", "logic": "\nMosh(lavinie, stearne)\nUnblushing(lavinie)\nTimorese(lavinie)\nCommingle(lavinie, stearne)\nMosh(stearne, lavinie)\nTimorese(stearne)\nEgest(stearne, lavinie)\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) and Unblushing(x) -> Kaput(x))\nforall x (Timorese(x) and Mosh(x, lavinie) -> Absolved(x))\nforall x (Commingle(x, lavinie) and Mosh(lavinie, stearne) -> Commingle(stearne, lavinie))\nEgest(stearne, lavinie) -> Egest(lavinie, stearne)\nforall x (Mosh(x, lavinie) -> Kaput(lavinie))\nforall x (Kaput(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\n\nnot Bowlegged(stearne)\n\nforall x (Kaput(x) -> Bowlegged(x)) <- forall x (Bowlegged(x) and Unblushing(x) -> Kaput(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The beth convulse the patience. The beth is eventual. The beth is clenched. The beth reave the patience. The patience convulse the beth. The patience is clenched. The patience pepper the beth. All mendacious, eventual people are unerasable. If someone is clenched and they eat the beth then they are wearied. If someone reave the beth and the beth convulse the patience then the patience reave the beth. If the patience pepper the beth then the beth pepper the patience. If someone convulse the beth then the beth is unerasable. Green people are mendacious. The patience reave the beth.", "logic": "\nConvulse(beth, patience)\nEventual(beth)\nClenched(beth)\nReave(beth, patience)\nConvulse(patience, beth)\nClenched(patience)\nPepper(patience, beth)\nforall x (Mendacious(x) and Eventual(x) -> Unerasable(x))\nforall x (Clenched(x) and Convulse(x, beth) -> Wearied(x))\nforall x (Reave(x, beth) and Convulse(beth, patience) -> Reave(patience, beth))\nPepper(patience, beth) -> Pepper(beth, patience)\nforall x (Convulse(x, beth) -> Unerasable(beth))\nforall x (Unerasable(x) -> Mendacious(x))\n\nReave(patience, beth)\n\nforall x (Reave(x, beth) and Convulse(beth, patience) -> Reave(patience, beth)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The parsifal lark the rozella. The parsifal is valorous. The parsifal is fagged. The parsifal shake the rozella. The rozella lark the parsifal. The rozella is fagged. The rozella pension the parsifal. All threatened, valorous people are nonnatural. If someone is fagged and they eat the parsifal then they are horrific. If someone shake the parsifal and the parsifal lark the rozella then the rozella shake the parsifal. If the rozella pension the parsifal then the parsifal pension the rozella. If someone lark the parsifal then the parsifal is nonnatural. Green people are threatened. The parsifal is not horrific.", "logic": "\nLark(parsifal, rozella)\nValorous(parsifal)\nFagged(parsifal)\nShake(parsifal, rozella)\nLark(rozella, parsifal)\nFagged(rozella)\nPension(rozella, parsifal)\nforall x (Threatened(x) and Valorous(x) -> Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Fagged(x) and Lark(x, parsifal) -> Horrific(x))\nforall x (Shake(x, parsifal) and Lark(parsifal, rozella) -> Shake(rozella, parsifal))\nPension(rozella, parsifal) -> Pension(parsifal, rozella)\nforall x (Lark(x, parsifal) -> Nonnatural(parsifal))\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) -> Threatened(x))\n\nnot Horrific(parsifal)\n\nforall x (Fagged(x) and Lark(x, parsifal) -> Horrific(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The stevie extricate the eba. The stevie is shrivelled. The stevie is geodesical. The stevie mimic the eba. The eba extricate the stevie. The eba is geodesical. The eba zinc the stevie. All conelike, shrivelled people are sectorial. If someone is geodesical and they eat the stevie then they are untilled. If someone mimic the stevie and the stevie extricate the eba then the eba mimic the stevie. If the eba zinc the stevie then the stevie zinc the eba. If someone extricate the stevie then the stevie is sectorial. Green people are conelike. The stevie mimic the stevie.", "logic": "\nExtricate(stevie, eba)\nShrivelled(stevie)\nGeodesical(stevie)\nMimic(stevie, eba)\nExtricate(eba, stevie)\nGeodesical(eba)\nZinc(eba, stevie)\nforall x (Conelike(x) and Shrivelled(x) -> Sectorial(x))\nforall x (Geodesical(x) and Extricate(x, stevie) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Mimic(x, stevie) and Extricate(stevie, eba) -> Mimic(eba, stevie))\nZinc(eba, stevie) -> Zinc(stevie, eba)\nforall x (Extricate(x, stevie) -> Sectorial(stevie))\nforall x (Sectorial(x) -> Conelike(x))\n\nMimic(stevie, stevie)\n\nMimic(stevie, stevie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The elwyn reconsider the merline. The elwyn is taking. The elwyn is diclinous. The elwyn empathize the merline. The merline reconsider the elwyn. The merline is diclinous. The merline vault the elwyn. All spousal, taking people are alarming. If someone is diclinous and they eat the elwyn then they are hyperfine. If someone empathize the elwyn and the elwyn reconsider the merline then the merline empathize the elwyn. If the merline vault the elwyn then the elwyn vault the merline. If someone reconsider the elwyn then the elwyn is alarming. Green people are spousal. The elwyn does not visit the elwyn.", "logic": "\nReconsider(elwyn, merline)\nTaking(elwyn)\nDiclinous(elwyn)\nEmpathize(elwyn, merline)\nReconsider(merline, elwyn)\nDiclinous(merline)\nVault(merline, elwyn)\nforall x (Spousal(x) and Taking(x) -> Alarming(x))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) and Reconsider(x, elwyn) -> Hyperfine(x))\nforall x (Empathize(x, elwyn) and Reconsider(elwyn, merline) -> Empathize(merline, elwyn))\nVault(merline, elwyn) -> Vault(elwyn, merline)\nforall x (Reconsider(x, elwyn) -> Alarming(elwyn))\nforall x (Alarming(x) -> Spousal(x))\n\nnot Vault(elwyn, elwyn)\n\nnot Vault(elwyn, elwyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "The jock desquamate the joanne. The jock is anadromous. The jock is photic. The jock pirate the joanne. The joanne desquamate the jock. The joanne is photic. The joanne cranch the jock. All shaped, anadromous people are vesicant. If someone is photic and they eat the jock then they are royal. If someone pirate the jock and the jock desquamate the joanne then the joanne pirate the jock. If the joanne cranch the jock then the jock cranch the joanne. If someone desquamate the jock then the jock is vesicant. Green people are shaped. The joanne pirate the joanne.", "logic": "\nDesquamate(jock, joanne)\nAnadromous(jock)\nPhotic(jock)\nPirate(jock, joanne)\nDesquamate(joanne, jock)\nPhotic(joanne)\nCranch(joanne, jock)\nforall x (Shaped(x) and Anadromous(x) -> Vesicant(x))\nforall x (Photic(x) and Desquamate(x, jock) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Pirate(x, jock) and Desquamate(jock, joanne) -> Pirate(joanne, jock))\nCranch(joanne, jock) -> Cranch(jock, joanne)\nforall x (Desquamate(x, jock) -> Vesicant(jock))\nforall x (Vesicant(x) -> Shaped(x))\n\nPirate(joanne, joanne)\n\nPirate(joanne, joanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1522"} {"premises": "Dominick is moderating. Dominick is drugless. Dominick is minuscule. Dominick is inanimate. Dominick is unequal. Dominick is awake. Abbe is drugless. Abbe is minuscule. Abbe is recent. Abbe is awake. If something is inanimate then it is moderating. Rough, minuscule things are drugless. If Abbe is unequal and Abbe is inanimate then Abbe is drugless. All awake things are inanimate. All unequal, moderating things are minuscule. Big, minuscule things are drugless. Round, moderating things are drugless. Smart, drugless things are recent. Dominick is awake.", "logic": "\nModerating(dominick)\nDrugless(dominick)\nMinuscule(dominick)\nInanimate(dominick)\nUnequal(dominick)\nAwake(dominick)\nDrugless(abbe)\nMinuscule(abbe)\nRecent(abbe)\nAwake(abbe)\nforall x (Inanimate(x) -> Moderating(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Drugless(x))\nUnequal(abbe) and Inanimate(abbe) -> Drugless(abbe)\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Inanimate(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Moderating(x) -> Minuscule(x))\nforall x (Moderating(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Moderating(x) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Drugless(x) -> Recent(x))\n\nAwake(dominick)\n\ntherefore Awake(dominick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-764"} {"premises": "Lilly is jaded. Lilly is resettled. Lilly is fifteen. Lilly is cavalier. Lilly is writhed. Lilly is unmarked. Dulce is resettled. Dulce is fifteen. Dulce is outdoor. Dulce is unmarked. If something is cavalier then it is jaded. Rough, fifteen things are resettled. If Dulce is writhed and Dulce is cavalier then Dulce is resettled. All unmarked things are cavalier. All writhed, jaded things are fifteen. Big, fifteen things are resettled. Round, jaded things are resettled. Smart, resettled things are outdoor. Lilly is not unmarked.", "logic": "\nJaded(lilly)\nResettled(lilly)\nFifteen(lilly)\nCavalier(lilly)\nWrithed(lilly)\nUnmarked(lilly)\nResettled(dulce)\nFifteen(dulce)\nOutdoor(dulce)\nUnmarked(dulce)\nforall x (Cavalier(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Outdoor(x) and Fifteen(x) -> Resettled(x))\nWrithed(dulce) and Cavalier(dulce) -> Resettled(dulce)\nforall x (Unmarked(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Writhed(x) and Jaded(x) -> Fifteen(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) and Fifteen(x) -> Resettled(x))\nforall x (Cavalier(x) and Jaded(x) -> Resettled(x))\nforall x (Writhed(x) and Resettled(x) -> Outdoor(x))\n\nnot Unmarked(lilly)\n\ntherefore Unmarked(lilly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-764"} {"premises": "Zorro is deserted. Zorro is cinnabar. Zorro is shot. Zorro is dentate. Zorro is backmost. Zorro is prosy. Faith is cinnabar. Faith is shot. Faith is irritable. Faith is prosy. If something is dentate then it is deserted. Rough, shot things are cinnabar. If Faith is backmost and Faith is dentate then Faith is cinnabar. All prosy things are dentate. All backmost, deserted things are shot. Big, shot things are cinnabar. Round, deserted things are cinnabar. Smart, cinnabar things are irritable. Faith is dentate.", "logic": "\nDeserted(zorro)\nCinnabar(zorro)\nShot(zorro)\nDentate(zorro)\nBackmost(zorro)\nProsy(zorro)\nCinnabar(faith)\nShot(faith)\nIrritable(faith)\nProsy(faith)\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> Deserted(x))\nforall x (Irritable(x) and Shot(x) -> Cinnabar(x))\nBackmost(faith) and Dentate(faith) -> Cinnabar(faith)\nforall x (Prosy(x) -> Dentate(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) and Deserted(x) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Shot(x) -> Cinnabar(x))\nforall x (Dentate(x) and Deserted(x) -> Cinnabar(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) and Cinnabar(x) -> Irritable(x))\n\nDentate(faith)\n\nProsy(faith) and forall x (Prosy(x) -> Dentate(x)) -> therefore Dentate(faith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-764"} {"premises": "Harmon is selfless. Harmon is hesperian. Harmon is bias. Harmon is ungual. Harmon is debasing. Harmon is waggish. Kass is hesperian. Kass is bias. Kass is taxing. Kass is waggish. If something is ungual then it is selfless. Rough, bias things are hesperian. If Kass is debasing and Kass is ungual then Kass is hesperian. All waggish things are ungual. All debasing, selfless things are bias. Big, bias things are hesperian. Round, selfless things are hesperian. Smart, hesperian things are taxing. Kass is not ungual.", "logic": "\nSelfless(harmon)\nHesperian(harmon)\nBias(harmon)\nUngual(harmon)\nDebasing(harmon)\nWaggish(harmon)\nHesperian(kass)\nBias(kass)\nTaxing(kass)\nWaggish(kass)\nforall x (Ungual(x) -> Selfless(x))\nforall x (Taxing(x) and Bias(x) -> Hesperian(x))\nDebasing(kass) and Ungual(kass) -> Hesperian(kass)\nforall x (Waggish(x) -> Ungual(x))\nforall x (Debasing(x) and Selfless(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Selfless(x) and Bias(x) -> Hesperian(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) and Selfless(x) -> Hesperian(x))\nforall x (Debasing(x) and Hesperian(x) -> Taxing(x))\n\nnot Ungual(kass)\n\nWaggish(kass) and forall x (Waggish(x) -> Ungual(x)) -> therefore Ungual(kass)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-764"} {"premises": "Yevette is gummed. Yevette is largo. Yevette is bound. Yevette is tweedy. Yevette is chelate. Yevette is porose. Georgia is largo. Georgia is bound. Georgia is afeard. Georgia is porose. If something is tweedy then it is gummed. Rough, bound things are largo. If Georgia is chelate and Georgia is tweedy then Georgia is largo. All porose things are tweedy. All chelate, gummed things are bound. Big, bound things are largo. Round, gummed things are largo. Smart, largo things are afeard. Georgia is gummed.", "logic": "\nGummed(yevette)\nLargo(yevette)\nBound(yevette)\nTweedy(yevette)\nChelate(yevette)\nPorose(yevette)\nLargo(georgia)\nBound(georgia)\nAfeard(georgia)\nPorose(georgia)\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Gummed(x))\nforall x (Afeard(x) and Bound(x) -> Largo(x))\nChelate(georgia) and Tweedy(georgia) -> Largo(georgia)\nforall x (Porose(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x) and Gummed(x) -> Bound(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) and Bound(x) -> Largo(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Gummed(x) -> Largo(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x) and Largo(x) -> Afeard(x))\n\nGummed(georgia)\n\nPorose(georgia) and forall x (Porose(x) -> Tweedy(x)) -> therefore Tweedy(georgia) Tweedy(georgia) and forall x (Tweedy(x) -> Gummed(x)) -> therefore Gummed(georgia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-764"} {"premises": "Ivette is doomed. Ivette is hindmost. Ivette is atonic. Ivette is scrubbed. Ivette is afoul. Ivette is tinkly. Cristine is hindmost. Cristine is atonic. Cristine is cubital. Cristine is tinkly. If something is scrubbed then it is doomed. Rough, atonic things are hindmost. If Cristine is afoul and Cristine is scrubbed then Cristine is hindmost. All tinkly things are scrubbed. All afoul, doomed things are atonic. Big, atonic things are hindmost. Round, doomed things are hindmost. Smart, hindmost things are cubital. Cristine is not doomed.", "logic": "\nDoomed(ivette)\nHindmost(ivette)\nAtonic(ivette)\nScrubbed(ivette)\nAfoul(ivette)\nTinkly(ivette)\nHindmost(cristine)\nAtonic(cristine)\nCubital(cristine)\nTinkly(cristine)\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) -> Doomed(x))\nforall x (Cubital(x) and Atonic(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nAfoul(cristine) and Scrubbed(cristine) -> Hindmost(cristine)\nforall x (Tinkly(x) -> Scrubbed(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Doomed(x) -> Atonic(x))\nforall x (Doomed(x) and Atonic(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) and Doomed(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Hindmost(x) -> Cubital(x))\n\nnot Doomed(cristine)\n\nTinkly(cristine) and forall x (Tinkly(x) -> Scrubbed(x)) -> therefore Scrubbed(cristine) Scrubbed(cristine) and forall x (Scrubbed(x) -> Doomed(x)) -> therefore Doomed(cristine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-764"} {"premises": "Alys is definite. Alys is comfy. Ailyn is spoiled. Barrett is definite. Barrett is scalloped. Charmion is not spoiled. Charmion is not definite. Charmion is scalloped. Charmion is not slighting. Charmion is appalling. If something is scalloped and definite then it is branchy. Kind things are branchy. Nice things are scalloped. If Charmion is definite and Charmion is not scalloped then Charmion is spoiled. Big, scalloped things are slighting. Nice things are not spoiled. Red, branchy things are not spoiled. All spoiled things are appalling. Barrett is scalloped.", "logic": "\nDefinite(alys)\nComfy(alys)\nSpoiled(ailyn)\nDefinite(barrett)\nScalloped(barrett)\nnot Spoiled(charmion)\nnot Definite(charmion)\nScalloped(charmion)\nnot Slighting(charmion)\nAppalling(charmion)\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Definite(x) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nDefinite(charmion) and not Scalloped(charmion) -> Spoiled(charmion)\nforall x (Spoiled(x) and Scalloped(x) -> Slighting(x))\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> not Spoiled(x))\nforall x (Appalling(x) and Branchy(x) -> not Spoiled(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) -> Appalling(x))\n\nScalloped(barrett)\n\ntherefore Scalloped(barrett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Jean is express. Jean is motorised. Mavra is useless. Godard is express. Godard is ransacked. Kristyn is not useless. Kristyn is not express. Kristyn is ransacked. Kristyn is not stagnant. Kristyn is duplicate. If something is ransacked and express then it is cosmetic. Kind things are cosmetic. Nice things are ransacked. If Kristyn is express and Kristyn is not ransacked then Kristyn is useless. Big, ransacked things are stagnant. Nice things are not useless. Red, cosmetic things are not useless. All useless things are duplicate. Jean is not motorised.", "logic": "\nExpress(jean)\nMotorised(jean)\nUseless(mavra)\nExpress(godard)\nRansacked(godard)\nnot Useless(kristyn)\nnot Express(kristyn)\nRansacked(kristyn)\nnot Stagnant(kristyn)\nDuplicate(kristyn)\nforall x (Ransacked(x) and Express(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Motorised(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) -> Ransacked(x))\nExpress(kristyn) and not Ransacked(kristyn) -> Useless(kristyn)\nforall x (Useless(x) and Ransacked(x) -> Stagnant(x))\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) -> not Useless(x))\nforall x (Duplicate(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> not Useless(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Duplicate(x))\n\nnot Motorised(jean)\n\ntherefore Motorised(jean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Sollie is vertebral. Sollie is fatalist. Kinna is narrowed. Wileen is vertebral. Wileen is monogynic. Merrilee is not narrowed. Merrilee is not vertebral. Merrilee is monogynic. Merrilee is not papillate. Merrilee is remarkable. If something is monogynic and vertebral then it is designing. Kind things are designing. Nice things are monogynic. If Merrilee is vertebral and Merrilee is not monogynic then Merrilee is narrowed. Big, monogynic things are papillate. Nice things are not narrowed. Red, designing things are not narrowed. All narrowed things are remarkable. Wileen is designing.", "logic": "\nVertebral(sollie)\nFatalist(sollie)\nNarrowed(kinna)\nVertebral(wileen)\nMonogynic(wileen)\nnot Narrowed(merrilee)\nnot Vertebral(merrilee)\nMonogynic(merrilee)\nnot Papillate(merrilee)\nRemarkable(merrilee)\nforall x (Monogynic(x) and Vertebral(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Fatalist(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Designing(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nVertebral(merrilee) and not Monogynic(merrilee) -> Narrowed(merrilee)\nforall x (Narrowed(x) and Monogynic(x) -> Papillate(x))\nforall x (Designing(x) -> not Narrowed(x))\nforall x (Remarkable(x) and Designing(x) -> not Narrowed(x))\nforall x (Narrowed(x) -> Remarkable(x))\n\nDesigning(wileen)\n\nMonogynic(wileen) and Vertebral(wileen) and forall x (Monogynic(x) and Vertebral(x) -> Designing(x)) -> therefore Designing(wileen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Teri is geologic. Teri is brooding. Conrad is dimmed. Paolina is geologic. Paolina is outcast. Thornie is not dimmed. Thornie is not geologic. Thornie is outcast. Thornie is not unpeaceful. Thornie is arboreal. If something is outcast and geologic then it is landed. Kind things are landed. Nice things are outcast. If Thornie is geologic and Thornie is not outcast then Thornie is dimmed. Big, outcast things are unpeaceful. Nice things are not dimmed. Red, landed things are not dimmed. All dimmed things are arboreal. Paolina is not landed.", "logic": "\nGeologic(teri)\nBrooding(teri)\nDimmed(conrad)\nGeologic(paolina)\nOutcast(paolina)\nnot Dimmed(thornie)\nnot Geologic(thornie)\nOutcast(thornie)\nnot Unpeaceful(thornie)\nArboreal(thornie)\nforall x (Outcast(x) and Geologic(x) -> Landed(x))\nforall x (Brooding(x) -> Landed(x))\nforall x (Landed(x) -> Outcast(x))\nGeologic(thornie) and not Outcast(thornie) -> Dimmed(thornie)\nforall x (Dimmed(x) and Outcast(x) -> Unpeaceful(x))\nforall x (Landed(x) -> not Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Arboreal(x) and Landed(x) -> not Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Dimmed(x) -> Arboreal(x))\n\nnot Landed(paolina)\n\nOutcast(paolina) and Geologic(paolina) and forall x (Outcast(x) and Geologic(x) -> Landed(x)) -> therefore Landed(paolina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Shelden is papery. Shelden is occult. Aurel is inanimate. Caroleen is papery. Caroleen is idiopathic. Russell is not inanimate. Russell is not papery. Russell is idiopathic. Russell is not extinct. Russell is seaward. If something is idiopathic and papery then it is excitant. Kind things are excitant. Nice things are idiopathic. If Russell is papery and Russell is not idiopathic then Russell is inanimate. Big, idiopathic things are extinct. Nice things are not inanimate. Red, excitant things are not inanimate. All inanimate things are seaward. Caroleen is not inanimate.", "logic": "\nPapery(shelden)\nOccult(shelden)\nInanimate(aurel)\nPapery(caroleen)\nIdiopathic(caroleen)\nnot Inanimate(russell)\nnot Papery(russell)\nIdiopathic(russell)\nnot Extinct(russell)\nSeaward(russell)\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) and Papery(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Occult(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> Idiopathic(x))\nPapery(russell) and not Idiopathic(russell) -> Inanimate(russell)\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Idiopathic(x) -> Extinct(x))\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> not Inanimate(x))\nforall x (Seaward(x) and Excitant(x) -> not Inanimate(x))\nforall x (Inanimate(x) -> Seaward(x))\n\nnot Inanimate(caroleen)\n\nIdiopathic(caroleen) and Papery(caroleen) and forall x (Idiopathic(x) and Papery(x) -> Excitant(x)) -> therefore Excitant(caroleen) Excitant(caroleen) and forall x (Excitant(x) -> not Inanimate(x)) -> therefore not Inanimate(caroleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Rianon is upcountry. Rianon is sorrowing. Wally is awake. Terrence is upcountry. Terrence is apetalous. Torrance is not awake. Torrance is not upcountry. Torrance is apetalous. Torrance is not galwegian. Torrance is friendless. If something is apetalous and upcountry then it is hawaiian. Kind things are hawaiian. Nice things are apetalous. If Torrance is upcountry and Torrance is not apetalous then Torrance is awake. Big, apetalous things are galwegian. Nice things are not awake. Red, hawaiian things are not awake. All awake things are friendless. Terrence is awake.", "logic": "\nUpcountry(rianon)\nSorrowing(rianon)\nAwake(wally)\nUpcountry(terrence)\nApetalous(terrence)\nnot Awake(torrance)\nnot Upcountry(torrance)\nApetalous(torrance)\nnot Galwegian(torrance)\nFriendless(torrance)\nforall x (Apetalous(x) and Upcountry(x) -> Hawaiian(x))\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) -> Hawaiian(x))\nforall x (Hawaiian(x) -> Apetalous(x))\nUpcountry(torrance) and not Apetalous(torrance) -> Awake(torrance)\nforall x (Awake(x) and Apetalous(x) -> Galwegian(x))\nforall x (Hawaiian(x) -> not Awake(x))\nforall x (Friendless(x) and Hawaiian(x) -> not Awake(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Friendless(x))\n\nAwake(terrence)\n\nApetalous(terrence) and Upcountry(terrence) and forall x (Apetalous(x) and Upcountry(x) -> Hawaiian(x)) -> therefore Hawaiian(terrence) Hawaiian(terrence) and forall x (Hawaiian(x) -> not Awake(x)) -> therefore not Awake(terrence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Salomon is docile. Salomon is ionic. Margeaux is dwindling. Darsie is docile. Darsie is sauteed. Rudolf is not dwindling. Rudolf is not docile. Rudolf is sauteed. Rudolf is not fibrous. Rudolf is hymenal. If something is sauteed and docile then it is fuggy. Kind things are fuggy. Nice things are sauteed. If Rudolf is docile and Rudolf is not sauteed then Rudolf is dwindling. Big, sauteed things are fibrous. Nice things are not dwindling. Red, fuggy things are not dwindling. All dwindling things are hymenal. Darsie is not fibrous.", "logic": "\nDocile(salomon)\nIonic(salomon)\nDwindling(margeaux)\nDocile(darsie)\nSauteed(darsie)\nnot Dwindling(rudolf)\nnot Docile(rudolf)\nSauteed(rudolf)\nnot Fibrous(rudolf)\nHymenal(rudolf)\nforall x (Sauteed(x) and Docile(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Ionic(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Fuggy(x) -> Sauteed(x))\nDocile(rudolf) and not Sauteed(rudolf) -> Dwindling(rudolf)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Sauteed(x) -> Fibrous(x))\nforall x (Fuggy(x) -> not Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Hymenal(x) and Fuggy(x) -> not Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> Hymenal(x))\n\nnot Fibrous(darsie)\n\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Sauteed(x) -> Fibrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Corinne is equanimous. Corinne is paternal. Sophie is tunisian. Addis is equanimous. Addis is shredded. Rhodia is not tunisian. Rhodia is not equanimous. Rhodia is shredded. Rhodia is not adjustive. Rhodia is trophic. If something is shredded and equanimous then it is unlamented. Kind things are unlamented. Nice things are shredded. If Rhodia is equanimous and Rhodia is not shredded then Rhodia is tunisian. Big, shredded things are adjustive. Nice things are not tunisian. Red, unlamented things are not tunisian. All tunisian things are trophic. Corinne is trophic.", "logic": "\nEquanimous(corinne)\nPaternal(corinne)\nTunisian(sophie)\nEquanimous(addis)\nShredded(addis)\nnot Tunisian(rhodia)\nnot Equanimous(rhodia)\nShredded(rhodia)\nnot Adjustive(rhodia)\nTrophic(rhodia)\nforall x (Shredded(x) and Equanimous(x) -> Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Unlamented(x) -> Shredded(x))\nEquanimous(rhodia) and not Shredded(rhodia) -> Tunisian(rhodia)\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and Shredded(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nforall x (Unlamented(x) -> not Tunisian(x))\nforall x (Trophic(x) and Unlamented(x) -> not Tunisian(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> Trophic(x))\n\nTrophic(corinne)\n\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> Trophic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Adriaens is regal. Adriaens is next. Camila is leaden. Kalila is regal. Kalila is cordial. Angelique is not leaden. Angelique is not regal. Angelique is cordial. Angelique is not dextral. Angelique is thematic. If something is cordial and regal then it is shortened. Kind things are shortened. Nice things are cordial. If Angelique is regal and Angelique is not cordial then Angelique is leaden. Big, cordial things are dextral. Nice things are not leaden. Red, shortened things are not leaden. All leaden things are thematic. Camila is not dextral.", "logic": "\nRegal(adriaens)\nNext(adriaens)\nLeaden(camila)\nRegal(kalila)\nCordial(kalila)\nnot Leaden(angelique)\nnot Regal(angelique)\nCordial(angelique)\nnot Dextral(angelique)\nThematic(angelique)\nforall x (Cordial(x) and Regal(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Next(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Cordial(x))\nRegal(angelique) and not Cordial(angelique) -> Leaden(angelique)\nforall x (Leaden(x) and Cordial(x) -> Dextral(x))\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> not Leaden(x))\nforall x (Thematic(x) and Shortened(x) -> not Leaden(x))\nforall x (Leaden(x) -> Thematic(x))\n\nnot Dextral(camila)\n\nforall x (Leaden(x) and Cordial(x) -> Dextral(x)) <- forall x (Shortened(x) -> Cordial(x)) <- forall x (Cordial(x) and Regal(x) -> Shortened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Florri is fitful. Florri is bullate. Christ is cancelled. Jaynell is fitful. Jaynell is getable. Jennette is not cancelled. Jennette is not fitful. Jennette is getable. Jennette is not maddening. Jennette is arborical. If something is getable and fitful then it is wrought. Kind things are wrought. Nice things are getable. If Jennette is fitful and Jennette is not getable then Jennette is cancelled. Big, getable things are maddening. Nice things are not cancelled. Red, wrought things are not cancelled. All cancelled things are arborical. Jennette is bullate.", "logic": "\nFitful(florri)\nBullate(florri)\nCancelled(christ)\nFitful(jaynell)\nGetable(jaynell)\nnot Cancelled(jennette)\nnot Fitful(jennette)\nGetable(jennette)\nnot Maddening(jennette)\nArborical(jennette)\nforall x (Getable(x) and Fitful(x) -> Wrought(x))\nforall x (Bullate(x) -> Wrought(x))\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> Getable(x))\nFitful(jennette) and not Getable(jennette) -> Cancelled(jennette)\nforall x (Cancelled(x) and Getable(x) -> Maddening(x))\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> not Cancelled(x))\nforall x (Arborical(x) and Wrought(x) -> not Cancelled(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) -> Arborical(x))\n\nBullate(jennette)\n\nBullate(jennette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Valli is ohmic. Valli is ammonitic. Doris is halting. Terrance is ohmic. Terrance is allopathic. Prent is not halting. Prent is not ohmic. Prent is allopathic. Prent is not various. Prent is moving. If something is allopathic and ohmic then it is fizzy. Kind things are fizzy. Nice things are allopathic. If Prent is ohmic and Prent is not allopathic then Prent is halting. Big, allopathic things are various. Nice things are not halting. Red, fizzy things are not halting. All halting things are moving. Doris is not ohmic.", "logic": "\nOhmic(valli)\nAmmonitic(valli)\nHalting(doris)\nOhmic(terrance)\nAllopathic(terrance)\nnot Halting(prent)\nnot Ohmic(prent)\nAllopathic(prent)\nnot Various(prent)\nMoving(prent)\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Ohmic(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nOhmic(prent) and not Allopathic(prent) -> Halting(prent)\nforall x (Halting(x) and Allopathic(x) -> Various(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> not Halting(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) and Fizzy(x) -> not Halting(x))\nforall x (Halting(x) -> Moving(x))\n\nnot Ohmic(doris)\n\nnot Ohmic(doris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "Dorit is unbeholden. Dorit is arduous. Juan is trifid. Avis is unbeholden. Avis is maverick. Norwood is not trifid. Norwood is not unbeholden. Norwood is maverick. Norwood is not lengthy. Norwood is united. If something is maverick and unbeholden then it is decreasing. Kind things are decreasing. Nice things are maverick. If Norwood is unbeholden and Norwood is not maverick then Norwood is trifid. Big, maverick things are lengthy. Nice things are not trifid. Red, decreasing things are not trifid. All trifid things are united. Avis is arduous.", "logic": "\nUnbeholden(dorit)\nArduous(dorit)\nTrifid(juan)\nUnbeholden(avis)\nMaverick(avis)\nnot Trifid(norwood)\nnot Unbeholden(norwood)\nMaverick(norwood)\nnot Lengthy(norwood)\nUnited(norwood)\nforall x (Maverick(x) and Unbeholden(x) -> Decreasing(x))\nforall x (Arduous(x) -> Decreasing(x))\nforall x (Decreasing(x) -> Maverick(x))\nUnbeholden(norwood) and not Maverick(norwood) -> Trifid(norwood)\nforall x (Trifid(x) and Maverick(x) -> Lengthy(x))\nforall x (Decreasing(x) -> not Trifid(x))\nforall x (United(x) and Decreasing(x) -> not Trifid(x))\nforall x (Trifid(x) -> United(x))\n\nArduous(avis)\n\nArduous(avis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-666"} {"premises": "The sholom fricassee the devinne. The sholom is upturned. The sholom is indecorous. The sholom is purgative. The sholom appose the devinne. The sholom bash the devinne. The devinne fricassee the sholom. The devinne is upturned. The devinne is indecorous. The devinne is purgative. The devinne appose the sholom. The devinne bash the sholom. If something is purgative and upturned then it bash the sholom. If something bash the sholom then it fricassee the sholom. The devinne fricassee the sholom.", "logic": "\nFricassee(sholom, devinne)\nUpturned(sholom)\nIndecorous(sholom)\nPurgative(sholom)\nAppose(sholom, devinne)\nBash(sholom, devinne)\nFricassee(devinne, sholom)\nUpturned(devinne)\nIndecorous(devinne)\nPurgative(devinne)\nAppose(devinne, sholom)\nBash(devinne, sholom)\nforall x (Purgative(x) and Upturned(x) -> Bash(x, sholom))\nforall x (Bash(x, sholom) -> Fricassee(x, sholom))\n\nFricassee(devinne, sholom)\n\ntherefore Fricassee(devinne, sholom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The nealson clash the emelyne. The nealson is pantheist. The nealson is majuscular. The nealson is unusual. The nealson barbarize the emelyne. The nealson vivisect the emelyne. The emelyne clash the nealson. The emelyne is pantheist. The emelyne is majuscular. The emelyne is unusual. The emelyne barbarize the nealson. The emelyne vivisect the nealson. If something is unusual and pantheist then it vivisect the nealson. If something vivisect the nealson then it clash the nealson. The nealson does not visit the emelyne.", "logic": "\nClash(nealson, emelyne)\nPantheist(nealson)\nMajuscular(nealson)\nUnusual(nealson)\nBarbarize(nealson, emelyne)\nVivisect(nealson, emelyne)\nClash(emelyne, nealson)\nPantheist(emelyne)\nMajuscular(emelyne)\nUnusual(emelyne)\nBarbarize(emelyne, nealson)\nVivisect(emelyne, nealson)\nforall x (Unusual(x) and Pantheist(x) -> Vivisect(x, nealson))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, nealson) -> Clash(x, nealson))\n\nnot Vivisect(nealson, emelyne)\n\ntherefore Vivisect(nealson, emelyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The rudolfo fellate the romeo. The rudolfo is adducent. The rudolfo is apart. The rudolfo is cheeky. The rudolfo french the romeo. The rudolfo transpose the romeo. The romeo fellate the rudolfo. The romeo is adducent. The romeo is apart. The romeo is cheeky. The romeo french the rudolfo. The romeo transpose the rudolfo. If something is cheeky and adducent then it transpose the rudolfo. If something transpose the rudolfo then it fellate the rudolfo. The rudolfo transpose the rudolfo.", "logic": "\nFellate(rudolfo, romeo)\nAdducent(rudolfo)\nApart(rudolfo)\nCheeky(rudolfo)\nFrench(rudolfo, romeo)\nTranspose(rudolfo, romeo)\nFellate(romeo, rudolfo)\nAdducent(romeo)\nApart(romeo)\nCheeky(romeo)\nFrench(romeo, rudolfo)\nTranspose(romeo, rudolfo)\nforall x (Cheeky(x) and Adducent(x) -> Transpose(x, rudolfo))\nforall x (Transpose(x, rudolfo) -> Fellate(x, rudolfo))\n\nTranspose(rudolfo, rudolfo)\n\nCheeky(rudolfo) and Adducent(rudolfo) and forall x (Cheeky(x) and Adducent(x) -> Transpose(x, rudolfo)) -> therefore Transpose(rudolfo, rudolfo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The fifi rise the buck. The fifi is mateless. The fifi is outmost. The fifi is starlit. The fifi victimise the buck. The fifi caution the buck. The buck rise the fifi. The buck is mateless. The buck is outmost. The buck is starlit. The buck victimise the fifi. The buck caution the fifi. If something is starlit and mateless then it caution the fifi. If something caution the fifi then it rise the fifi. The fifi does not visit the fifi.", "logic": "\nRise(fifi, buck)\nMateless(fifi)\nOutmost(fifi)\nStarlit(fifi)\nVictimise(fifi, buck)\nCaution(fifi, buck)\nRise(buck, fifi)\nMateless(buck)\nOutmost(buck)\nStarlit(buck)\nVictimise(buck, fifi)\nCaution(buck, fifi)\nforall x (Starlit(x) and Mateless(x) -> Caution(x, fifi))\nforall x (Caution(x, fifi) -> Rise(x, fifi))\n\nnot Caution(fifi, fifi)\n\nStarlit(fifi) and Mateless(fifi) and forall x (Starlit(x) and Mateless(x) -> Caution(x, fifi)) -> therefore Caution(fifi, fifi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The mozelle indulge the bab. The mozelle is outbred. The mozelle is neotenic. The mozelle is prognostic. The mozelle carbonise the bab. The mozelle compost the bab. The bab indulge the mozelle. The bab is outbred. The bab is neotenic. The bab is prognostic. The bab carbonise the mozelle. The bab compost the mozelle. If something is prognostic and outbred then it compost the mozelle. If something compost the mozelle then it indulge the mozelle. The mozelle indulge the mozelle.", "logic": "\nIndulge(mozelle, bab)\nOutbred(mozelle)\nNeotenic(mozelle)\nPrognostic(mozelle)\nCarbonise(mozelle, bab)\nCompost(mozelle, bab)\nIndulge(bab, mozelle)\nOutbred(bab)\nNeotenic(bab)\nPrognostic(bab)\nCarbonise(bab, mozelle)\nCompost(bab, mozelle)\nforall x (Prognostic(x) and Outbred(x) -> Compost(x, mozelle))\nforall x (Compost(x, mozelle) -> Indulge(x, mozelle))\n\nIndulge(mozelle, mozelle)\n\nPrognostic(mozelle) and Outbred(mozelle) and forall x (Prognostic(x) and Outbred(x) -> Compost(x, mozelle)) -> therefore Compost(mozelle, mozelle) Compost(mozelle, mozelle) and forall x (Compost(x, mozelle) -> Indulge(x, mozelle)) -> therefore Indulge(mozelle, mozelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The spud umpire the patrik. The spud is dominating. The spud is plumbous. The spud is aneroid. The spud imprison the patrik. The spud variegate the patrik. The patrik umpire the spud. The patrik is dominating. The patrik is plumbous. The patrik is aneroid. The patrik imprison the spud. The patrik variegate the spud. If something is aneroid and dominating then it variegate the spud. If something variegate the spud then it umpire the spud. The spud does not chase the spud.", "logic": "\nUmpire(spud, patrik)\nDominating(spud)\nPlumbous(spud)\nAneroid(spud)\nImprison(spud, patrik)\nVariegate(spud, patrik)\nUmpire(patrik, spud)\nDominating(patrik)\nPlumbous(patrik)\nAneroid(patrik)\nImprison(patrik, spud)\nVariegate(patrik, spud)\nforall x (Aneroid(x) and Dominating(x) -> Variegate(x, spud))\nforall x (Variegate(x, spud) -> Umpire(x, spud))\n\nnot Umpire(spud, spud)\n\nAneroid(spud) and Dominating(spud) and forall x (Aneroid(x) and Dominating(x) -> Variegate(x, spud)) -> therefore Variegate(spud, spud) Variegate(spud, spud) and forall x (Variegate(x, spud) -> Umpire(x, spud)) -> therefore Umpire(spud, spud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The lenka salute the steward. The lenka is hueless. The lenka is modeled. The lenka is imminent. The lenka flare the steward. The lenka woosh the steward. The steward salute the lenka. The steward is hueless. The steward is modeled. The steward is imminent. The steward flare the lenka. The steward woosh the lenka. If something is imminent and hueless then it woosh the lenka. If something woosh the lenka then it salute the lenka. The lenka is not red.", "logic": "\nSalute(lenka, steward)\nHueless(lenka)\nModeled(lenka)\nImminent(lenka)\nFlare(lenka, steward)\nWoosh(lenka, steward)\nSalute(steward, lenka)\nHueless(steward)\nModeled(steward)\nImminent(steward)\nFlare(steward, lenka)\nWoosh(steward, lenka)\nforall x (Imminent(x) and Hueless(x) -> Woosh(x, lenka))\nforall x (Woosh(x, lenka) -> Salute(x, lenka))\n\nnot Red(lenka)\n\nnot Red(lenka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The holley transcribe the kizzie. The holley is stubby. The holley is transpolar. The holley is unused. The holley reform the kizzie. The holley regress the kizzie. The kizzie transcribe the holley. The kizzie is stubby. The kizzie is transpolar. The kizzie is unused. The kizzie reform the holley. The kizzie regress the holley. If something is unused and stubby then it regress the holley. If something regress the holley then it transcribe the holley. The kizzie is red.", "logic": "\nTranscribe(holley, kizzie)\nStubby(holley)\nTranspolar(holley)\nUnused(holley)\nReform(holley, kizzie)\nRegress(holley, kizzie)\nTranscribe(kizzie, holley)\nStubby(kizzie)\nTranspolar(kizzie)\nUnused(kizzie)\nReform(kizzie, holley)\nRegress(kizzie, holley)\nforall x (Unused(x) and Stubby(x) -> Regress(x, holley))\nforall x (Regress(x, holley) -> Transcribe(x, holley))\n\nRed(kizzie)\n\nRed(kizzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The deb interlace the charlton. The deb is perversive. The deb is anginal. The deb is impromptu. The deb fulfil the charlton. The deb privilege the charlton. The charlton interlace the deb. The charlton is perversive. The charlton is anginal. The charlton is impromptu. The charlton fulfil the deb. The charlton privilege the deb. If something is impromptu and perversive then it privilege the deb. If something privilege the deb then it interlace the deb. The charlton is not rough.", "logic": "\nInterlace(deb, charlton)\nPerversive(deb)\nAnginal(deb)\nImpromptu(deb)\nFulfil(deb, charlton)\nPrivilege(deb, charlton)\nInterlace(charlton, deb)\nPerversive(charlton)\nAnginal(charlton)\nImpromptu(charlton)\nFulfil(charlton, deb)\nPrivilege(charlton, deb)\nforall x (Impromptu(x) and Perversive(x) -> Privilege(x, deb))\nforall x (Privilege(x, deb) -> Interlace(x, deb))\n\nnot Rough(charlton)\n\nnot Rough(charlton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The ricky crackle the neale. The ricky is victimised. The ricky is pictured. The ricky is uncolored. The ricky peptise the neale. The ricky lather the neale. The neale crackle the ricky. The neale is victimised. The neale is pictured. The neale is uncolored. The neale peptise the ricky. The neale lather the ricky. If something is uncolored and victimised then it lather the ricky. If something lather the ricky then it crackle the ricky. The ricky is rough.", "logic": "\nCrackle(ricky, neale)\nVictimised(ricky)\nPictured(ricky)\nUncolored(ricky)\nPeptise(ricky, neale)\nLather(ricky, neale)\nCrackle(neale, ricky)\nVictimised(neale)\nPictured(neale)\nUncolored(neale)\nPeptise(neale, ricky)\nLather(neale, ricky)\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and Victimised(x) -> Lather(x, ricky))\nforall x (Lather(x, ricky) -> Crackle(x, ricky))\n\nRough(ricky)\n\nRough(ricky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The marcelle unpick the brittan. The marcelle is fingered. The marcelle is sorrel. The marcelle is speakable. The marcelle segregate the brittan. The marcelle brachiate the brittan. The brittan unpick the marcelle. The brittan is fingered. The brittan is sorrel. The brittan is speakable. The brittan segregate the marcelle. The brittan brachiate the marcelle. If something is speakable and fingered then it brachiate the marcelle. If something brachiate the marcelle then it unpick the marcelle. The brittan does not visit the brittan.", "logic": "\nUnpick(marcelle, brittan)\nFingered(marcelle)\nSorrel(marcelle)\nSpeakable(marcelle)\nSegregate(marcelle, brittan)\nBrachiate(marcelle, brittan)\nUnpick(brittan, marcelle)\nFingered(brittan)\nSorrel(brittan)\nSpeakable(brittan)\nSegregate(brittan, marcelle)\nBrachiate(brittan, marcelle)\nforall x (Speakable(x) and Fingered(x) -> Brachiate(x, marcelle))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, marcelle) -> Unpick(x, marcelle))\n\nnot Brachiate(brittan, brittan)\n\nnot Brachiate(brittan, brittan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The cecily amass the carlo. The cecily is lecherous. The cecily is nonverbal. The cecily is chintzy. The cecily bromate the carlo. The cecily reduce the carlo. The carlo amass the cecily. The carlo is lecherous. The carlo is nonverbal. The carlo is chintzy. The carlo bromate the cecily. The carlo reduce the cecily. If something is chintzy and lecherous then it reduce the cecily. If something reduce the cecily then it amass the cecily. The carlo bromate the carlo.", "logic": "\nAmass(cecily, carlo)\nLecherous(cecily)\nNonverbal(cecily)\nChintzy(cecily)\nBromate(cecily, carlo)\nReduce(cecily, carlo)\nAmass(carlo, cecily)\nLecherous(carlo)\nNonverbal(carlo)\nChintzy(carlo)\nBromate(carlo, cecily)\nReduce(carlo, cecily)\nforall x (Chintzy(x) and Lecherous(x) -> Reduce(x, cecily))\nforall x (Reduce(x, cecily) -> Amass(x, cecily))\n\nBromate(carlo, carlo)\n\nBromate(carlo, carlo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-797"} {"premises": "The tarrance chitchat the madison. The madison is geophytic. If someone is geophytic then they like the tarrance. If someone sweeten the tarrance then the tarrance sweeten the madison. If the madison tope the tarrance then the tarrance sweeten the madison. The madison is geophytic.", "logic": "\nChitchat(tarrance, madison)\nGeophytic(madison)\nforall x (Geophytic(x) -> Sweeten(x, tarrance))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, tarrance) -> Sweeten(tarrance, madison))\nTope(madison, tarrance) -> Sweeten(tarrance, madison)\n\nGeophytic(madison)\n\ntherefore Geophytic(madison)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The tamera monetize the baxter. The baxter is choragic. If someone is choragic then they like the tamera. If someone generalise the tamera then the tamera generalise the baxter. If the baxter appeal the tamera then the tamera generalise the baxter. The tamera does not need the baxter.", "logic": "\nMonetize(tamera, baxter)\nChoragic(baxter)\nforall x (Choragic(x) -> Generalise(x, tamera))\nforall x (Generalise(x, tamera) -> Generalise(tamera, baxter))\nAppeal(baxter, tamera) -> Generalise(tamera, baxter)\n\nnot Monetize(tamera, baxter)\n\ntherefore Monetize(tamera, baxter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The godart rase the vern. The vern is authorial. If someone is authorial then they like the godart. If someone ovulate the godart then the godart ovulate the vern. If the vern spur the godart then the godart ovulate the vern. The vern ovulate the godart.", "logic": "\nRase(godart, vern)\nAuthorial(vern)\nforall x (Authorial(x) -> Ovulate(x, godart))\nforall x (Ovulate(x, godart) -> Ovulate(godart, vern))\nSpur(vern, godart) -> Ovulate(godart, vern)\n\nOvulate(vern, godart)\n\nAuthorial(vern) and forall x (Authorial(x) -> Ovulate(x, godart)) -> therefore Ovulate(vern, godart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The luis syllabify the essa. The essa is idyllic. If someone is idyllic then they like the luis. If someone overclothe the luis then the luis overclothe the essa. If the essa abrade the luis then the luis overclothe the essa. The essa does not like the luis.", "logic": "\nSyllabify(luis, essa)\nIdyllic(essa)\nforall x (Idyllic(x) -> Overclothe(x, luis))\nforall x (Overclothe(x, luis) -> Overclothe(luis, essa))\nAbrade(essa, luis) -> Overclothe(luis, essa)\n\nnot Overclothe(essa, luis)\n\nIdyllic(essa) and forall x (Idyllic(x) -> Overclothe(x, luis)) -> therefore Overclothe(essa, luis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The devon reflate the werner. The werner is simulated. If someone is simulated then they like the devon. If someone singe the devon then the devon singe the werner. If the werner galumph the devon then the devon singe the werner. The devon singe the werner.", "logic": "\nReflate(devon, werner)\nSimulated(werner)\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Singe(x, devon))\nforall x (Singe(x, devon) -> Singe(devon, werner))\nGalumph(werner, devon) -> Singe(devon, werner)\n\nSinge(devon, werner)\n\nSimulated(werner) and forall x (Simulated(x) -> Singe(x, devon)) -> therefore Singe(werner, devon) Singe(werner, devon) and forall x (Singe(x, devon) -> Singe(devon, werner)) -> therefore Singe(devon, werner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The marybelle achieve the elsbeth. The elsbeth is fatty. If someone is fatty then they like the marybelle. If someone mince the marybelle then the marybelle mince the elsbeth. If the elsbeth accent the marybelle then the marybelle mince the elsbeth. The marybelle does not like the elsbeth.", "logic": "\nAchieve(marybelle, elsbeth)\nFatty(elsbeth)\nforall x (Fatty(x) -> Mince(x, marybelle))\nforall x (Mince(x, marybelle) -> Mince(marybelle, elsbeth))\nAccent(elsbeth, marybelle) -> Mince(marybelle, elsbeth)\n\nnot Mince(marybelle, elsbeth)\n\nFatty(elsbeth) and forall x (Fatty(x) -> Mince(x, marybelle)) -> therefore Mince(elsbeth, marybelle) Mince(elsbeth, marybelle) and forall x (Mince(x, marybelle) -> Mince(marybelle, elsbeth)) -> therefore Mince(marybelle, elsbeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The shelden menace the phillipp. The phillipp is motherlike. If someone is motherlike then they like the shelden. If someone metal the shelden then the shelden metal the phillipp. If the phillipp espouse the shelden then the shelden metal the phillipp. The shelden does not like the shelden.", "logic": "\nMenace(shelden, phillipp)\nMotherlike(phillipp)\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Metal(x, shelden))\nforall x (Metal(x, shelden) -> Metal(shelden, phillipp))\nEspouse(phillipp, shelden) -> Metal(shelden, phillipp)\n\nnot Metal(shelden, shelden)\n\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Metal(x, shelden)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The crissy inveigh the effie. The effie is barbaric. If someone is barbaric then they like the crissy. If someone stick the crissy then the crissy stick the effie. If the effie redound the crissy then the crissy stick the effie. The crissy is red.", "logic": "\nInveigh(crissy, effie)\nBarbaric(effie)\nforall x (Barbaric(x) -> Stick(x, crissy))\nforall x (Stick(x, crissy) -> Stick(crissy, effie))\nRedound(effie, crissy) -> Stick(crissy, effie)\n\nRed(crissy)\n\nRed(crissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The rozalie mainline the tandie. The tandie is unplaced. If someone is unplaced then they like the rozalie. If someone bodypaint the rozalie then the rozalie bodypaint the tandie. If the tandie accredit the rozalie then the rozalie bodypaint the tandie. The rozalie does not visit the tandie.", "logic": "\nMainline(rozalie, tandie)\nUnplaced(tandie)\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Bodypaint(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Bodypaint(x, rozalie) -> Bodypaint(rozalie, tandie))\nAccredit(tandie, rozalie) -> Bodypaint(rozalie, tandie)\n\nnot Accredit(rozalie, tandie)\n\nnot Accredit(rozalie, tandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The lorianne represent the audre. The audre is sylphlike. If someone is sylphlike then they like the lorianne. If someone reef the lorianne then the lorianne reef the audre. If the audre pasture the lorianne then the lorianne reef the audre. The audre reef the audre.", "logic": "\nRepresent(lorianne, audre)\nSylphlike(audre)\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) -> Reef(x, lorianne))\nforall x (Reef(x, lorianne) -> Reef(lorianne, audre))\nPasture(audre, lorianne) -> Reef(lorianne, audre)\n\nReef(audre, audre)\n\nReef(audre, audre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The kally ticket the salvidor. The salvidor is degenerate. If someone is degenerate then they like the kally. If someone defer the kally then the kally defer the salvidor. If the salvidor reread the kally then the kally defer the salvidor. The kally does not need the kally.", "logic": "\nTicket(kally, salvidor)\nDegenerate(salvidor)\nforall x (Degenerate(x) -> Defer(x, kally))\nforall x (Defer(x, kally) -> Defer(kally, salvidor))\nReread(salvidor, kally) -> Defer(kally, salvidor)\n\nnot Ticket(kally, kally)\n\nnot Ticket(kally, kally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The anatola defer the benito. The benito is veritable. If someone is veritable then they like the anatola. If someone mortise the anatola then the anatola mortise the benito. If the benito medicate the anatola then the anatola mortise the benito. The anatola is cold.", "logic": "\nDefer(anatola, benito)\nVeritable(benito)\nforall x (Veritable(x) -> Mortise(x, anatola))\nforall x (Mortise(x, anatola) -> Mortise(anatola, benito))\nMedicate(benito, anatola) -> Mortise(anatola, benito)\n\nCold(anatola)\n\nCold(anatola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1803"} {"premises": "The cheslie anglicize the rodolfo. The danita is ready. The douggie is seeable. The rodolfo anglicize the danita. If someone anglicize the danita then they like the danita. If someone is immaterial and they eat the cheslie then they like the danita. If someone crenel the douggie then the douggie groin the cheslie. If the cheslie groin the rodolfo then the rodolfo anglicize the danita. If someone groin the danita then they are seeable. If someone is immaterial and they like the douggie then the douggie anglicize the cheslie. The rodolfo anglicize the danita.", "logic": "\nAnglicize(cheslie, rodolfo)\nReady(danita)\nSeeable(douggie)\nAnglicize(rodolfo, danita)\nforall x (Anglicize(x, danita) -> Groin(x, danita))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Crenel(x, cheslie) -> Groin(x, danita))\nforall x (Crenel(x, douggie) -> Groin(douggie, cheslie))\nGroin(cheslie, rodolfo) -> Anglicize(rodolfo, danita)\nforall x (Groin(x, danita) -> Seeable(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Groin(x, douggie) -> Anglicize(douggie, cheslie))\n\nAnglicize(rodolfo, danita)\n\ntherefore Anglicize(rodolfo, danita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The wilma react the hanford. The taite is myopathic. The demetria is battered. The hanford react the taite. If someone react the taite then they like the taite. If someone is pulmonary and they eat the wilma then they like the taite. If someone spacewalk the demetria then the demetria lifehack the wilma. If the wilma lifehack the hanford then the hanford react the taite. If someone lifehack the taite then they are battered. If someone is pulmonary and they like the demetria then the demetria react the wilma. The wilma does not see the hanford.", "logic": "\nReact(wilma, hanford)\nMyopathic(taite)\nBattered(demetria)\nReact(hanford, taite)\nforall x (React(x, taite) -> Lifehack(x, taite))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Spacewalk(x, wilma) -> Lifehack(x, taite))\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, demetria) -> Lifehack(demetria, wilma))\nLifehack(wilma, hanford) -> React(hanford, taite)\nforall x (Lifehack(x, taite) -> Battered(x))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Lifehack(x, demetria) -> React(demetria, wilma))\n\nnot React(wilma, hanford)\n\ntherefore React(wilma, hanford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The arthur establish the kristy. The tobit is restricted. The lorenzo is morbid. The kristy establish the tobit. If someone establish the tobit then they like the tobit. If someone is variegated and they eat the arthur then they like the tobit. If someone conjugate the lorenzo then the lorenzo defraud the arthur. If the arthur defraud the kristy then the kristy establish the tobit. If someone defraud the tobit then they are morbid. If someone is variegated and they like the lorenzo then the lorenzo establish the arthur. The kristy defraud the tobit.", "logic": "\nEstablish(arthur, kristy)\nRestricted(tobit)\nMorbid(lorenzo)\nEstablish(kristy, tobit)\nforall x (Establish(x, tobit) -> Defraud(x, tobit))\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Conjugate(x, arthur) -> Defraud(x, tobit))\nforall x (Conjugate(x, lorenzo) -> Defraud(lorenzo, arthur))\nDefraud(arthur, kristy) -> Establish(kristy, tobit)\nforall x (Defraud(x, tobit) -> Morbid(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Defraud(x, lorenzo) -> Establish(lorenzo, arthur))\n\nDefraud(kristy, tobit)\n\nEstablish(kristy, tobit) and forall x (Establish(x, tobit) -> Defraud(x, tobit)) -> therefore Defraud(kristy, tobit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The dodi regain the dedra. The kaspar is xxiii. The leia is stitched. The dedra regain the kaspar. If someone regain the kaspar then they like the kaspar. If someone is elysian and they eat the dodi then they like the kaspar. If someone clack the leia then the leia interact the dodi. If the dodi interact the dedra then the dedra regain the kaspar. If someone interact the kaspar then they are stitched. If someone is elysian and they like the leia then the leia regain the dodi. The dedra does not like the kaspar.", "logic": "\nRegain(dodi, dedra)\nXxiii(kaspar)\nStitched(leia)\nRegain(dedra, kaspar)\nforall x (Regain(x, kaspar) -> Interact(x, kaspar))\nforall x (Elysian(x) and Clack(x, dodi) -> Interact(x, kaspar))\nforall x (Clack(x, leia) -> Interact(leia, dodi))\nInteract(dodi, dedra) -> Regain(dedra, kaspar)\nforall x (Interact(x, kaspar) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Elysian(x) and Interact(x, leia) -> Regain(leia, dodi))\n\nnot Interact(dedra, kaspar)\n\nRegain(dedra, kaspar) and forall x (Regain(x, kaspar) -> Interact(x, kaspar)) -> therefore Interact(dedra, kaspar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The blake alchemise the christean. The bellamy is leprose. The madelena is acceptable. The christean alchemise the bellamy. If someone alchemise the bellamy then they like the bellamy. If someone is baltic and they eat the blake then they like the bellamy. If someone fireproof the madelena then the madelena tousle the blake. If the blake tousle the christean then the christean alchemise the bellamy. If someone tousle the bellamy then they are acceptable. If someone is baltic and they like the madelena then the madelena alchemise the blake. The christean is acceptable.", "logic": "\nAlchemise(blake, christean)\nLeprose(bellamy)\nAcceptable(madelena)\nAlchemise(christean, bellamy)\nforall x (Alchemise(x, bellamy) -> Tousle(x, bellamy))\nforall x (Baltic(x) and Fireproof(x, blake) -> Tousle(x, bellamy))\nforall x (Fireproof(x, madelena) -> Tousle(madelena, blake))\nTousle(blake, christean) -> Alchemise(christean, bellamy)\nforall x (Tousle(x, bellamy) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) and Tousle(x, madelena) -> Alchemise(madelena, blake))\n\nAcceptable(christean)\n\nAlchemise(christean, bellamy) and forall x (Alchemise(x, bellamy) -> Tousle(x, bellamy)) -> therefore Tousle(christean, bellamy) Tousle(christean, bellamy) and forall x (Tousle(x, bellamy) -> Acceptable(x)) -> therefore Acceptable(christean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The remington feminise the royce. The masha is picayune. The dayna is prayerful. The royce feminise the masha. If someone feminise the masha then they like the masha. If someone is meditative and they eat the remington then they like the masha. If someone preempt the dayna then the dayna ennoble the remington. If the remington ennoble the royce then the royce feminise the masha. If someone ennoble the masha then they are prayerful. If someone is meditative and they like the dayna then the dayna feminise the remington. The royce is not prayerful.", "logic": "\nFeminise(remington, royce)\nPicayune(masha)\nPrayerful(dayna)\nFeminise(royce, masha)\nforall x (Feminise(x, masha) -> Ennoble(x, masha))\nforall x (Meditative(x) and Preempt(x, remington) -> Ennoble(x, masha))\nforall x (Preempt(x, dayna) -> Ennoble(dayna, remington))\nEnnoble(remington, royce) -> Feminise(royce, masha)\nforall x (Ennoble(x, masha) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Meditative(x) and Ennoble(x, dayna) -> Feminise(dayna, remington))\n\nnot Prayerful(royce)\n\nFeminise(royce, masha) and forall x (Feminise(x, masha) -> Ennoble(x, masha)) -> therefore Ennoble(royce, masha) Ennoble(royce, masha) and forall x (Ennoble(x, masha) -> Prayerful(x)) -> therefore Prayerful(royce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The mariette shlep the dimitri. The lark is synchronic. The kathlene is actinal. The dimitri shlep the lark. If someone shlep the lark then they like the lark. If someone is inelastic and they eat the mariette then they like the lark. If someone unfrock the kathlene then the kathlene frock the mariette. If the mariette frock the dimitri then the dimitri shlep the lark. If someone frock the lark then they are actinal. If someone is inelastic and they like the kathlene then the kathlene shlep the mariette. The mariette does not like the lark.", "logic": "\nShlep(mariette, dimitri)\nSynchronic(lark)\nActinal(kathlene)\nShlep(dimitri, lark)\nforall x (Shlep(x, lark) -> Frock(x, lark))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Unfrock(x, mariette) -> Frock(x, lark))\nforall x (Unfrock(x, kathlene) -> Frock(kathlene, mariette))\nFrock(mariette, dimitri) -> Shlep(dimitri, lark)\nforall x (Frock(x, lark) -> Actinal(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Frock(x, kathlene) -> Shlep(kathlene, mariette))\n\nnot Frock(mariette, lark)\n\nforall x (Shlep(x, lark) -> Frock(x, lark)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The desmund mince the lurleen. The damara is forceful. The baldwin is lxxii. The lurleen mince the damara. If someone mince the damara then they like the damara. If someone is geophytic and they eat the desmund then they like the damara. If someone crinkle the baldwin then the baldwin surround the desmund. If the desmund surround the lurleen then the lurleen mince the damara. If someone surround the damara then they are lxxii. If someone is geophytic and they like the baldwin then the baldwin mince the desmund. The damara surround the damara.", "logic": "\nMince(desmund, lurleen)\nForceful(damara)\nLxxii(baldwin)\nMince(lurleen, damara)\nforall x (Mince(x, damara) -> Surround(x, damara))\nforall x (Geophytic(x) and Crinkle(x, desmund) -> Surround(x, damara))\nforall x (Crinkle(x, baldwin) -> Surround(baldwin, desmund))\nSurround(desmund, lurleen) -> Mince(lurleen, damara)\nforall x (Surround(x, damara) -> Lxxii(x))\nforall x (Geophytic(x) and Surround(x, baldwin) -> Mince(baldwin, desmund))\n\nSurround(damara, damara)\n\nforall x (Mince(x, damara) -> Surround(x, damara)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The celestine except the ana. The korrie is overstated. The jeralee is relentless. The ana except the korrie. If someone except the korrie then they like the korrie. If someone is tactless and they eat the celestine then they like the korrie. If someone devise the jeralee then the jeralee overfly the celestine. If the celestine overfly the ana then the ana except the korrie. If someone overfly the korrie then they are relentless. If someone is tactless and they like the jeralee then the jeralee except the celestine. The celestine is not relentless.", "logic": "\nExcept(celestine, ana)\nOverstated(korrie)\nRelentless(jeralee)\nExcept(ana, korrie)\nforall x (Except(x, korrie) -> Overfly(x, korrie))\nforall x (Tactless(x) and Devise(x, celestine) -> Overfly(x, korrie))\nforall x (Devise(x, jeralee) -> Overfly(jeralee, celestine))\nOverfly(celestine, ana) -> Except(ana, korrie)\nforall x (Overfly(x, korrie) -> Relentless(x))\nforall x (Tactless(x) and Overfly(x, jeralee) -> Except(jeralee, celestine))\n\nnot Relentless(celestine)\n\nforall x (Overfly(x, korrie) -> Relentless(x)) <- forall x (Except(x, korrie) -> Overfly(x, korrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The elisha ladle the armond. The royce is thorny. The dulcea is archaistic. The armond ladle the royce. If someone ladle the royce then they like the royce. If someone is abkhazian and they eat the elisha then they like the royce. If someone sparge the dulcea then the dulcea stash the elisha. If the elisha stash the armond then the armond ladle the royce. If someone stash the royce then they are archaistic. If someone is abkhazian and they like the dulcea then the dulcea ladle the elisha. The armond stash the elisha.", "logic": "\nLadle(elisha, armond)\nThorny(royce)\nArchaistic(dulcea)\nLadle(armond, royce)\nforall x (Ladle(x, royce) -> Stash(x, royce))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Sparge(x, elisha) -> Stash(x, royce))\nforall x (Sparge(x, dulcea) -> Stash(dulcea, elisha))\nStash(elisha, armond) -> Ladle(armond, royce)\nforall x (Stash(x, royce) -> Archaistic(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Stash(x, dulcea) -> Ladle(dulcea, elisha))\n\nStash(armond, elisha)\n\nStash(armond, elisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The mort disport the marianna. The pearl is nubile. The corabelle is giving. The marianna disport the pearl. If someone disport the pearl then they like the pearl. If someone is rejective and they eat the mort then they like the pearl. If someone tusk the corabelle then the corabelle gossip the mort. If the mort gossip the marianna then the marianna disport the pearl. If someone gossip the pearl then they are giving. If someone is rejective and they like the corabelle then the corabelle disport the mort. The marianna does not see the marianna.", "logic": "\nDisport(mort, marianna)\nNubile(pearl)\nGiving(corabelle)\nDisport(marianna, pearl)\nforall x (Disport(x, pearl) -> Gossip(x, pearl))\nforall x (Rejective(x) and Tusk(x, mort) -> Gossip(x, pearl))\nforall x (Tusk(x, corabelle) -> Gossip(corabelle, mort))\nGossip(mort, marianna) -> Disport(marianna, pearl)\nforall x (Gossip(x, pearl) -> Giving(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) and Gossip(x, corabelle) -> Disport(corabelle, mort))\n\nnot Disport(marianna, marianna)\n\nnot Disport(marianna, marianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "The merrile bank the damien. The rhonda is cozy. The gretna is fernless. The damien bank the rhonda. If someone bank the rhonda then they like the rhonda. If someone is assured and they eat the merrile then they like the rhonda. If someone subtitle the gretna then the gretna sham the merrile. If the merrile sham the damien then the damien bank the rhonda. If someone sham the rhonda then they are fernless. If someone is assured and they like the gretna then the gretna bank the merrile. The damien subtitle the rhonda.", "logic": "\nBank(merrile, damien)\nCozy(rhonda)\nFernless(gretna)\nBank(damien, rhonda)\nforall x (Bank(x, rhonda) -> Sham(x, rhonda))\nforall x (Assured(x) and Subtitle(x, merrile) -> Sham(x, rhonda))\nforall x (Subtitle(x, gretna) -> Sham(gretna, merrile))\nSham(merrile, damien) -> Bank(damien, rhonda)\nforall x (Sham(x, rhonda) -> Fernless(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) and Sham(x, gretna) -> Bank(gretna, merrile))\n\nSubtitle(damien, rhonda)\n\nSubtitle(damien, rhonda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-578"} {"premises": "Stormie is mutable. Stormie is mercerized. Rochester is unlikely. Rochester is unneeded. Rochester is venerating. Geri is venerating. Lydia is mercerized. Nice, limbic things are venerating. All unneeded things are limbic. Green, unneeded things are ligneous. If Geri is venerating then Geri is mercerized. All unneeded, venerating things are unlikely. If something is venerating and unlikely then it is mutable. Rochester is unneeded.", "logic": "\nMutable(stormie)\nMercerized(stormie)\nUnlikely(rochester)\nUnneeded(rochester)\nVenerating(rochester)\nVenerating(geri)\nMercerized(lydia)\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and Limbic(x) -> Venerating(x))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Mutable(x) and Unneeded(x) -> Ligneous(x))\nVenerating(geri) -> Mercerized(geri)\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and Venerating(x) -> Unlikely(x))\nforall x (Venerating(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Mutable(x))\n\nUnneeded(rochester)\n\ntherefore Unneeded(rochester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Bria is soigne. Bria is clownlike. Anais is knockdown. Anais is agelong. Anais is glimmery. Herbie is glimmery. Hildy is clownlike. Nice, starchy things are glimmery. All agelong things are starchy. Green, agelong things are sensate. If Herbie is glimmery then Herbie is clownlike. All agelong, glimmery things are knockdown. If something is glimmery and knockdown then it is soigne. Herbie is not glimmery.", "logic": "\nSoigne(bria)\nClownlike(bria)\nKnockdown(anais)\nAgelong(anais)\nGlimmery(anais)\nGlimmery(herbie)\nClownlike(hildy)\nforall x (Agelong(x) and Starchy(x) -> Glimmery(x))\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Starchy(x))\nforall x (Soigne(x) and Agelong(x) -> Sensate(x))\nGlimmery(herbie) -> Clownlike(herbie)\nforall x (Agelong(x) and Glimmery(x) -> Knockdown(x))\nforall x (Glimmery(x) and Knockdown(x) -> Soigne(x))\n\nnot Glimmery(herbie)\n\ntherefore Glimmery(herbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Dinah is brassy. Dinah is zany. Babita is exalting. Babita is teasing. Babita is discrepant. Johny is discrepant. Pauli is zany. Nice, euphoriant things are discrepant. All teasing things are euphoriant. Green, teasing things are evanescent. If Johny is discrepant then Johny is zany. All teasing, discrepant things are exalting. If something is discrepant and exalting then it is brassy. Babita is brassy.", "logic": "\nBrassy(dinah)\nZany(dinah)\nExalting(babita)\nTeasing(babita)\nDiscrepant(babita)\nDiscrepant(johny)\nZany(pauli)\nforall x (Teasing(x) and Euphoriant(x) -> Discrepant(x))\nforall x (Teasing(x) -> Euphoriant(x))\nforall x (Brassy(x) and Teasing(x) -> Evanescent(x))\nDiscrepant(johny) -> Zany(johny)\nforall x (Teasing(x) and Discrepant(x) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Discrepant(x) and Exalting(x) -> Brassy(x))\n\nBrassy(babita)\n\nDiscrepant(babita) and Exalting(babita) and forall x (Discrepant(x) and Exalting(x) -> Brassy(x)) -> therefore Brassy(babita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Rennie is alkahestic. Rennie is immotile. Charmine is uneducated. Charmine is cenozoic. Charmine is righteous. Marti is righteous. Raymundo is immotile. Nice, bulblike things are righteous. All cenozoic things are bulblike. Green, cenozoic things are dalmatian. If Marti is righteous then Marti is immotile. All cenozoic, righteous things are uneducated. If something is righteous and uneducated then it is alkahestic. Charmine is not alkahestic.", "logic": "\nAlkahestic(rennie)\nImmotile(rennie)\nUneducated(charmine)\nCenozoic(charmine)\nRighteous(charmine)\nRighteous(marti)\nImmotile(raymundo)\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) and Bulblike(x) -> Righteous(x))\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) -> Bulblike(x))\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) and Cenozoic(x) -> Dalmatian(x))\nRighteous(marti) -> Immotile(marti)\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) and Righteous(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Righteous(x) and Uneducated(x) -> Alkahestic(x))\n\nnot Alkahestic(charmine)\n\nRighteous(charmine) and Uneducated(charmine) and forall x (Righteous(x) and Uneducated(x) -> Alkahestic(x)) -> therefore Alkahestic(charmine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Angel is southwest. Angel is fizzing. Pearl is ashen. Pearl is lovable. Pearl is botanic. Roobbie is botanic. Keren is fizzing. Nice, gingival things are botanic. All lovable things are gingival. Green, lovable things are cordate. If Roobbie is botanic then Roobbie is fizzing. All lovable, botanic things are ashen. If something is botanic and ashen then it is southwest. Pearl is cordate.", "logic": "\nSouthwest(angel)\nFizzing(angel)\nAshen(pearl)\nLovable(pearl)\nBotanic(pearl)\nBotanic(roobbie)\nFizzing(keren)\nforall x (Lovable(x) and Gingival(x) -> Botanic(x))\nforall x (Lovable(x) -> Gingival(x))\nforall x (Southwest(x) and Lovable(x) -> Cordate(x))\nBotanic(roobbie) -> Fizzing(roobbie)\nforall x (Lovable(x) and Botanic(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Botanic(x) and Ashen(x) -> Southwest(x))\n\nCordate(pearl)\n\nBotanic(pearl) and Ashen(pearl) and forall x (Botanic(x) and Ashen(x) -> Southwest(x)) -> therefore Southwest(pearl) Southwest(pearl) and Lovable(pearl) and forall x (Southwest(x) and Lovable(x) -> Cordate(x)) -> therefore Cordate(pearl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Arnold is romanist. Arnold is subsidised. Kerri is untrimmed. Kerri is hirsute. Kerri is arbitrable. Inesita is arbitrable. Nerti is subsidised. Nice, alarmed things are arbitrable. All hirsute things are alarmed. Green, hirsute things are footsore. If Inesita is arbitrable then Inesita is subsidised. All hirsute, arbitrable things are untrimmed. If something is arbitrable and untrimmed then it is romanist. Kerri is not footsore.", "logic": "\nRomanist(arnold)\nSubsidised(arnold)\nUntrimmed(kerri)\nHirsute(kerri)\nArbitrable(kerri)\nArbitrable(inesita)\nSubsidised(nerti)\nforall x (Hirsute(x) and Alarmed(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) -> Alarmed(x))\nforall x (Romanist(x) and Hirsute(x) -> Footsore(x))\nArbitrable(inesita) -> Subsidised(inesita)\nforall x (Hirsute(x) and Arbitrable(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nforall x (Arbitrable(x) and Untrimmed(x) -> Romanist(x))\n\nnot Footsore(kerri)\n\nArbitrable(kerri) and Untrimmed(kerri) and forall x (Arbitrable(x) and Untrimmed(x) -> Romanist(x)) -> therefore Romanist(kerri) Romanist(kerri) and Hirsute(kerri) and forall x (Romanist(x) and Hirsute(x) -> Footsore(x)) -> therefore Footsore(kerri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Shanta is unwearied. Shanta is derogative. Hew is lupine. Hew is bacteroid. Hew is noetic. Taddeo is noetic. Philis is derogative. Nice, motherly things are noetic. All bacteroid things are motherly. Green, bacteroid things are monastic. If Taddeo is noetic then Taddeo is derogative. All bacteroid, noetic things are lupine. If something is noetic and lupine then it is unwearied. Philis is not monastic.", "logic": "\nUnwearied(shanta)\nDerogative(shanta)\nLupine(hew)\nBacteroid(hew)\nNoetic(hew)\nNoetic(taddeo)\nDerogative(philis)\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) and Motherly(x) -> Noetic(x))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Unwearied(x) and Bacteroid(x) -> Monastic(x))\nNoetic(taddeo) -> Derogative(taddeo)\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) and Noetic(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Noetic(x) and Lupine(x) -> Unwearied(x))\n\nnot Monastic(philis)\n\nforall x (Unwearied(x) and Bacteroid(x) -> Monastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Graeme is deistic. Graeme is flaunty. Darline is serrate. Darline is tender. Darline is levitical. Darian is levitical. Ellwood is flaunty. Nice, unisex things are levitical. All tender things are unisex. Green, tender things are epiphyseal. If Darian is levitical then Darian is flaunty. All tender, levitical things are serrate. If something is levitical and serrate then it is deistic. Ellwood is levitical.", "logic": "\nDeistic(graeme)\nFlaunty(graeme)\nSerrate(darline)\nTender(darline)\nLevitical(darline)\nLevitical(darian)\nFlaunty(ellwood)\nforall x (Tender(x) and Unisex(x) -> Levitical(x))\nforall x (Tender(x) -> Unisex(x))\nforall x (Deistic(x) and Tender(x) -> Epiphyseal(x))\nLevitical(darian) -> Flaunty(darian)\nforall x (Tender(x) and Levitical(x) -> Serrate(x))\nforall x (Levitical(x) and Serrate(x) -> Deistic(x))\n\nLevitical(ellwood)\n\nforall x (Tender(x) and Unisex(x) -> Levitical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Archibald is lacelike. Archibald is abounding. Aggi is fancy. Aggi is acquirable. Aggi is bantering. Sherri is bantering. Waylan is abounding. Nice, calcuttan things are bantering. All acquirable things are calcuttan. Green, acquirable things are operatic. If Sherri is bantering then Sherri is abounding. All acquirable, bantering things are fancy. If something is bantering and fancy then it is lacelike. Waylan is not fancy.", "logic": "\nLacelike(archibald)\nAbounding(archibald)\nFancy(aggi)\nAcquirable(aggi)\nBantering(aggi)\nBantering(sherri)\nAbounding(waylan)\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and Calcuttan(x) -> Bantering(x))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Lacelike(x) and Acquirable(x) -> Operatic(x))\nBantering(sherri) -> Abounding(sherri)\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and Bantering(x) -> Fancy(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) and Fancy(x) -> Lacelike(x))\n\nnot Fancy(waylan)\n\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and Bantering(x) -> Fancy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Rudy is reflective. Rudy is hearable. Scarface is choosy. Scarface is pietistic. Scarface is weaned. Karalee is weaned. Bradley is hearable. Nice, unripened things are weaned. All pietistic things are unripened. Green, pietistic things are eligible. If Karalee is weaned then Karalee is hearable. All pietistic, weaned things are choosy. If something is weaned and choosy then it is reflective. Rudy is pietistic.", "logic": "\nReflective(rudy)\nHearable(rudy)\nChoosy(scarface)\nPietistic(scarface)\nWeaned(scarface)\nWeaned(karalee)\nHearable(bradley)\nforall x (Pietistic(x) and Unripened(x) -> Weaned(x))\nforall x (Pietistic(x) -> Unripened(x))\nforall x (Reflective(x) and Pietistic(x) -> Eligible(x))\nWeaned(karalee) -> Hearable(karalee)\nforall x (Pietistic(x) and Weaned(x) -> Choosy(x))\nforall x (Weaned(x) and Choosy(x) -> Reflective(x))\n\nPietistic(rudy)\n\nPietistic(rudy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Blinny is blimpish. Blinny is unmarried. Magdalena is deferent. Magdalena is undyed. Magdalena is estranging. Wiley is estranging. Rennie is unmarried. Nice, monied things are estranging. All undyed things are monied. Green, undyed things are ambulant. If Wiley is estranging then Wiley is unmarried. All undyed, estranging things are deferent. If something is estranging and deferent then it is blimpish. Magdalena is not unmarried.", "logic": "\nBlimpish(blinny)\nUnmarried(blinny)\nDeferent(magdalena)\nUndyed(magdalena)\nEstranging(magdalena)\nEstranging(wiley)\nUnmarried(rennie)\nforall x (Undyed(x) and Monied(x) -> Estranging(x))\nforall x (Undyed(x) -> Monied(x))\nforall x (Blimpish(x) and Undyed(x) -> Ambulant(x))\nEstranging(wiley) -> Unmarried(wiley)\nforall x (Undyed(x) and Estranging(x) -> Deferent(x))\nforall x (Estranging(x) and Deferent(x) -> Blimpish(x))\n\nnot Unmarried(magdalena)\n\nnot Unmarried(magdalena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Chryste is focussed. Chryste is varicose. Douglis is taloned. Douglis is shod. Douglis is separated. Mervin is separated. Rusty is varicose. Nice, proclaimed things are separated. All shod things are proclaimed. Green, shod things are nonmodern. If Mervin is separated then Mervin is varicose. All shod, separated things are taloned. If something is separated and taloned then it is focussed. Mervin is shod.", "logic": "\nFocussed(chryste)\nVaricose(chryste)\nTaloned(douglis)\nShod(douglis)\nSeparated(douglis)\nSeparated(mervin)\nVaricose(rusty)\nforall x (Shod(x) and Proclaimed(x) -> Separated(x))\nforall x (Shod(x) -> Proclaimed(x))\nforall x (Focussed(x) and Shod(x) -> Nonmodern(x))\nSeparated(mervin) -> Varicose(mervin)\nforall x (Shod(x) and Separated(x) -> Taloned(x))\nforall x (Separated(x) and Taloned(x) -> Focussed(x))\n\nShod(mervin)\n\nShod(mervin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1466"} {"premises": "Gisela is lxxii. Gisela is tartarean. Mignonne is lxxii. Patty is topical. Stacie is posed. Stacie is tartarean. Stacie is topical. Big things are tartarean. If something is tartarean then it is paunchy. Round, paunchy things are posed. Stacie is tartarean.", "logic": "\nLxxii(gisela)\nTartarean(gisela)\nLxxii(mignonne)\nTopical(patty)\nPosed(stacie)\nTartarean(stacie)\nTopical(stacie)\nforall x (Chintzy(x) -> Tartarean(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) -> Paunchy(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) and Paunchy(x) -> Posed(x))\n\nTartarean(stacie)\n\ntherefore Tartarean(stacie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Nessy is welcoming. Nessy is simple. Dorolice is welcoming. Heddie is blinding. Travers is quadruplex. Travers is simple. Travers is blinding. Big things are simple. If something is simple then it is static. Round, static things are quadruplex. Travers is not simple.", "logic": "\nWelcoming(nessy)\nSimple(nessy)\nWelcoming(dorolice)\nBlinding(heddie)\nQuadruplex(travers)\nSimple(travers)\nBlinding(travers)\nforall x (Childly(x) -> Simple(x))\nforall x (Simple(x) -> Static(x))\nforall x (Simple(x) and Static(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\n\nnot Simple(travers)\n\ntherefore Simple(travers)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Aleks is irritating. Aleks is fortissimo. Valina is irritating. Eliza is malaysian. Farah is anonymous. Farah is fortissimo. Farah is malaysian. Big things are fortissimo. If something is fortissimo then it is tapped. Round, tapped things are anonymous. Farah is tapped.", "logic": "\nIrritating(aleks)\nFortissimo(aleks)\nIrritating(valina)\nMalaysian(eliza)\nAnonymous(farah)\nFortissimo(farah)\nMalaysian(farah)\nforall x (Testicular(x) -> Fortissimo(x))\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) and Tapped(x) -> Anonymous(x))\n\nTapped(farah)\n\nFortissimo(farah) and forall x (Fortissimo(x) -> Tapped(x)) -> therefore Tapped(farah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Winna is fevered. Winna is described. Herbert is fevered. Keeley is exuvial. Alisa is unbelted. Alisa is described. Alisa is exuvial. Big things are described. If something is described then it is thievish. Round, thievish things are unbelted. Alisa is not thievish.", "logic": "\nFevered(winna)\nDescribed(winna)\nFevered(herbert)\nExuvial(keeley)\nUnbelted(alisa)\nDescribed(alisa)\nExuvial(alisa)\nforall x (Microbic(x) -> Described(x))\nforall x (Described(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Described(x) and Thievish(x) -> Unbelted(x))\n\nnot Thievish(alisa)\n\nDescribed(alisa) and forall x (Described(x) -> Thievish(x)) -> therefore Thievish(alisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Stig is stubbled. Stig is heartfelt. Rayna is stubbled. Dickey is unassisted. Brad is jacobinic. Brad is heartfelt. Brad is unassisted. Big things are heartfelt. If something is heartfelt then it is untired. Round, untired things are jacobinic. Stig is jacobinic.", "logic": "\nStubbled(stig)\nHeartfelt(stig)\nStubbled(rayna)\nUnassisted(dickey)\nJacobinic(brad)\nHeartfelt(brad)\nUnassisted(brad)\nforall x (Cylindric(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) and Untired(x) -> Jacobinic(x))\n\nJacobinic(stig)\n\nHeartfelt(stig) and forall x (Heartfelt(x) -> Untired(x)) -> therefore Untired(stig) Heartfelt(stig) and Untired(stig) and forall x (Heartfelt(x) and Untired(x) -> Jacobinic(x)) -> therefore Jacobinic(stig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Gilda is unpopular. Gilda is prodigal. Nicholas is unpopular. Agneta is feminist. Amity is appareled. Amity is prodigal. Amity is feminist. Big things are prodigal. If something is prodigal then it is boastful. Round, boastful things are appareled. Gilda is not appareled.", "logic": "\nUnpopular(gilda)\nProdigal(gilda)\nUnpopular(nicholas)\nFeminist(agneta)\nAppareled(amity)\nProdigal(amity)\nFeminist(amity)\nforall x (Arabic(x) -> Prodigal(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Boastful(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) and Boastful(x) -> Appareled(x))\n\nnot Appareled(gilda)\n\nProdigal(gilda) and forall x (Prodigal(x) -> Boastful(x)) -> therefore Boastful(gilda) Prodigal(gilda) and Boastful(gilda) and forall x (Prodigal(x) and Boastful(x) -> Appareled(x)) -> therefore Appareled(gilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Iolande is fallow. Iolande is feudatory. Gabbie is fallow. Cara is ocher. Vonni is intertidal. Vonni is feudatory. Vonni is ocher. Big things are feudatory. If something is feudatory then it is riskless. Round, riskless things are intertidal. Cara is not intertidal.", "logic": "\nFallow(iolande)\nFeudatory(iolande)\nFallow(gabbie)\nOcher(cara)\nIntertidal(vonni)\nFeudatory(vonni)\nOcher(vonni)\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Feudatory(x))\nforall x (Feudatory(x) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Feudatory(x) and Riskless(x) -> Intertidal(x))\n\nnot Intertidal(cara)\n\nforall x (Feudatory(x) and Riskless(x) -> Intertidal(x)) <- forall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Feudatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Theodoric is soused. Theodoric is removed. Ofella is soused. Norina is papillary. Nichole is comforting. Nichole is removed. Nichole is papillary. Big things are removed. If something is removed then it is zonary. Round, zonary things are comforting. Ofella is removed.", "logic": "\nSoused(theodoric)\nRemoved(theodoric)\nSoused(ofella)\nPapillary(norina)\nComforting(nichole)\nRemoved(nichole)\nPapillary(nichole)\nforall x (Useful(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Removed(x) -> Zonary(x))\nforall x (Removed(x) and Zonary(x) -> Comforting(x))\n\nRemoved(ofella)\n\nforall x (Useful(x) -> Removed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Lynde is bunchy. Lynde is indicative. Cherish is bunchy. Juliana is hipless. Angel is aneurismal. Angel is indicative. Angel is hipless. Big things are indicative. If something is indicative then it is openhanded. Round, openhanded things are aneurismal. Cherish is not aneurismal.", "logic": "\nBunchy(lynde)\nIndicative(lynde)\nBunchy(cherish)\nHipless(juliana)\nAneurismal(angel)\nIndicative(angel)\nHipless(angel)\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Indicative(x))\nforall x (Indicative(x) -> Openhanded(x))\nforall x (Indicative(x) and Openhanded(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\n\nnot Aneurismal(cherish)\n\nforall x (Indicative(x) and Openhanded(x) -> Aneurismal(x)) <- forall x (Tropic(x) -> Indicative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Osbourne is supple. Osbourne is inimitable. Cass is supple. Mathew is unpierced. Alberta is enzootic. Alberta is inimitable. Alberta is unpierced. Big things are inimitable. If something is inimitable then it is shitty. Round, shitty things are enzootic. Mathew is supple.", "logic": "\nSupple(osbourne)\nInimitable(osbourne)\nSupple(cass)\nUnpierced(mathew)\nEnzootic(alberta)\nInimitable(alberta)\nUnpierced(alberta)\nforall x (Piagetian(x) -> Inimitable(x))\nforall x (Inimitable(x) -> Shitty(x))\nforall x (Inimitable(x) and Shitty(x) -> Enzootic(x))\n\nSupple(mathew)\n\nSupple(mathew) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Christin is unvendible. Christin is cacogenic. Phyllys is unvendible. Peyter is spotless. Quent is specular. Quent is cacogenic. Quent is spotless. Big things are cacogenic. If something is cacogenic then it is textual. Round, textual things are specular. Phyllys is not quiet.", "logic": "\nUnvendible(christin)\nCacogenic(christin)\nUnvendible(phyllys)\nSpotless(peyter)\nSpecular(quent)\nCacogenic(quent)\nSpotless(quent)\nforall x (Flawless(x) -> Cacogenic(x))\nforall x (Cacogenic(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Cacogenic(x) and Textual(x) -> Specular(x))\n\nnot Quiet(phyllys)\n\nnot Quiet(phyllys) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Andee is blended. Andee is muddled. Davis is blended. Uri is cutthroat. Oliy is momentary. Oliy is muddled. Oliy is cutthroat. Big things are muddled. If something is muddled then it is stressful. Round, stressful things are momentary. Andee is quiet.", "logic": "\nBlended(andee)\nMuddled(andee)\nBlended(davis)\nCutthroat(uri)\nMomentary(oliy)\nMuddled(oliy)\nCutthroat(oliy)\nforall x (Sanctified(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) -> Stressful(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) and Stressful(x) -> Momentary(x))\n\nQuiet(andee)\n\nQuiet(andee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "The erminia is artistic. The rollins does not eat the erminia. The rollins belch the ellsworth. The rollins is artistic. The rollins is earthly. The rollins is cherty. The rollins is binucleate. The rollins adduct the ellsworth. The ellsworth does not eat the erminia. The ellsworth is not artistic. The ellsworth is blinded. The ellsworth does not visit the rollins. If something is blinded then it douse the erminia. All earthly, artistic things are blinded. The ellsworth is blinded.", "logic": "\nArtistic(erminia)\nnot Belch(rollins, erminia)\nBelch(rollins, ellsworth)\nArtistic(rollins)\nEarthly(rollins)\nCherty(rollins)\nBinucleate(rollins)\nAdduct(rollins, ellsworth)\nnot Belch(ellsworth, erminia)\nnot Artistic(ellsworth)\nBlinded(ellsworth)\nnot Adduct(ellsworth, rollins)\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Douse(x, erminia))\nforall x (Earthly(x) and Artistic(x) -> Blinded(x))\n\nBlinded(ellsworth)\n\ntherefore Blinded(ellsworth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The asia is unwearying. The marcella does not eat the asia. The marcella maintain the suzzy. The marcella is unwearying. The marcella is fingerlike. The marcella is snarled. The marcella is creedal. The marcella sermonize the suzzy. The suzzy does not eat the asia. The suzzy is not unwearying. The suzzy is nonslip. The suzzy does not visit the marcella. If something is nonslip then it flaunt the asia. All fingerlike, unwearying things are nonslip. The suzzy is unwearying.", "logic": "\nUnwearying(asia)\nnot Maintain(marcella, asia)\nMaintain(marcella, suzzy)\nUnwearying(marcella)\nFingerlike(marcella)\nSnarled(marcella)\nCreedal(marcella)\nSermonize(marcella, suzzy)\nnot Maintain(suzzy, asia)\nnot Unwearying(suzzy)\nNonslip(suzzy)\nnot Sermonize(suzzy, marcella)\nforall x (Nonslip(x) -> Flaunt(x, asia))\nforall x (Fingerlike(x) and Unwearying(x) -> Nonslip(x))\n\nUnwearying(suzzy)\n\ntherefore not Unwearying(suzzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The marten is unvalued. The herve does not eat the marten. The herve repurchase the meridith. The herve is unvalued. The herve is diabatic. The herve is both. The herve is verbalised. The herve housekeep the meridith. The meridith does not eat the marten. The meridith is not unvalued. The meridith is fulsome. The meridith does not visit the herve. If something is fulsome then it canulate the marten. All diabatic, unvalued things are fulsome. The meridith canulate the marten.", "logic": "\nUnvalued(marten)\nnot Repurchase(herve, marten)\nRepurchase(herve, meridith)\nUnvalued(herve)\nDiabatic(herve)\nBoth(herve)\nVerbalised(herve)\nHousekeep(herve, meridith)\nnot Repurchase(meridith, marten)\nnot Unvalued(meridith)\nFulsome(meridith)\nnot Housekeep(meridith, herve)\nforall x (Fulsome(x) -> Canulate(x, marten))\nforall x (Diabatic(x) and Unvalued(x) -> Fulsome(x))\n\nCanulate(meridith, marten)\n\nFulsome(meridith) and forall x (Fulsome(x) -> Canulate(x, marten)) -> therefore Canulate(meridith, marten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The hobart is topologic. The janaye does not eat the hobart. The janaye serenade the elliott. The janaye is topologic. The janaye is friendless. The janaye is relative. The janaye is floccose. The janaye parent the elliott. The elliott does not eat the hobart. The elliott is not topologic. The elliott is ankylotic. The elliott does not visit the janaye. If something is ankylotic then it trim the hobart. All friendless, topologic things are ankylotic. The janaye is not ankylotic.", "logic": "\nTopologic(hobart)\nnot Serenade(janaye, hobart)\nSerenade(janaye, elliott)\nTopologic(janaye)\nFriendless(janaye)\nRelative(janaye)\nFloccose(janaye)\nParent(janaye, elliott)\nnot Serenade(elliott, hobart)\nnot Topologic(elliott)\nAnkylotic(elliott)\nnot Parent(elliott, janaye)\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Trim(x, hobart))\nforall x (Friendless(x) and Topologic(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\n\nnot Ankylotic(janaye)\n\nFriendless(janaye) and Topologic(janaye) and forall x (Friendless(x) and Topologic(x) -> Ankylotic(x)) -> therefore Ankylotic(janaye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The bennie is unlettered. The tamarra does not eat the bennie. The tamarra apologize the ralph. The tamarra is unlettered. The tamarra is unburied. The tamarra is lxvii. The tamarra is postexilic. The tamarra joggle the ralph. The ralph does not eat the bennie. The ralph is not unlettered. The ralph is fulgurous. The ralph does not visit the tamarra. If something is fulgurous then it delimit the bennie. All unburied, unlettered things are fulgurous. The tamarra delimit the bennie.", "logic": "\nUnlettered(bennie)\nnot Apologize(tamarra, bennie)\nApologize(tamarra, ralph)\nUnlettered(tamarra)\nUnburied(tamarra)\nLxvii(tamarra)\nPostexilic(tamarra)\nJoggle(tamarra, ralph)\nnot Apologize(ralph, bennie)\nnot Unlettered(ralph)\nFulgurous(ralph)\nnot Joggle(ralph, tamarra)\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Delimit(x, bennie))\nforall x (Unburied(x) and Unlettered(x) -> Fulgurous(x))\n\nDelimit(tamarra, bennie)\n\nUnburied(tamarra) and Unlettered(tamarra) and forall x (Unburied(x) and Unlettered(x) -> Fulgurous(x)) -> therefore Fulgurous(tamarra) Fulgurous(tamarra) and forall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Delimit(x, bennie)) -> therefore Delimit(tamarra, bennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The jessee is unbloody. The modesty does not eat the jessee. The modesty phase the lorry. The modesty is unbloody. The modesty is sullen. The modesty is subgross. The modesty is crural. The modesty ticktack the lorry. The lorry does not eat the jessee. The lorry is not unbloody. The lorry is champleve. The lorry does not visit the modesty. If something is champleve then it fine the jessee. All sullen, unbloody things are champleve. The modesty does not like the jessee.", "logic": "\nUnbloody(jessee)\nnot Phase(modesty, jessee)\nPhase(modesty, lorry)\nUnbloody(modesty)\nSullen(modesty)\nSubgross(modesty)\nCrural(modesty)\nTicktack(modesty, lorry)\nnot Phase(lorry, jessee)\nnot Unbloody(lorry)\nChampleve(lorry)\nnot Ticktack(lorry, modesty)\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Fine(x, jessee))\nforall x (Sullen(x) and Unbloody(x) -> Champleve(x))\n\nnot Fine(modesty, jessee)\n\nSullen(modesty) and Unbloody(modesty) and forall x (Sullen(x) and Unbloody(x) -> Champleve(x)) -> therefore Champleve(modesty) Champleve(modesty) and forall x (Champleve(x) -> Fine(x, jessee)) -> therefore Fine(modesty, jessee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The simonne is breathed. The carmella does not eat the simonne. The carmella calumniate the laurence. The carmella is breathed. The carmella is illegal. The carmella is atrial. The carmella is heedless. The carmella persecute the laurence. The laurence does not eat the simonne. The laurence is not breathed. The laurence is idealized. The laurence does not visit the carmella. If something is idealized then it shoal the simonne. All illegal, breathed things are idealized. The simonne does not like the simonne.", "logic": "\nBreathed(simonne)\nnot Calumniate(carmella, simonne)\nCalumniate(carmella, laurence)\nBreathed(carmella)\nIllegal(carmella)\nAtrial(carmella)\nHeedless(carmella)\nPersecute(carmella, laurence)\nnot Calumniate(laurence, simonne)\nnot Breathed(laurence)\nIdealized(laurence)\nnot Persecute(laurence, carmella)\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Shoal(x, simonne))\nforall x (Illegal(x) and Breathed(x) -> Idealized(x))\n\nnot Shoal(simonne, simonne)\n\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Shoal(x, simonne)) <- forall x (Illegal(x) and Breathed(x) -> Idealized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The ciel is venous. The verney does not eat the ciel. The verney ladle the riccardo. The verney is venous. The verney is premedical. The verney is resinated. The verney is rustic. The verney evidence the riccardo. The riccardo does not eat the ciel. The riccardo is not venous. The riccardo is squab. The riccardo does not visit the verney. If something is squab then it subserve the ciel. All premedical, venous things are squab. The ciel is squab.", "logic": "\nVenous(ciel)\nnot Ladle(verney, ciel)\nLadle(verney, riccardo)\nVenous(verney)\nPremedical(verney)\nResinated(verney)\nRustic(verney)\nEvidence(verney, riccardo)\nnot Ladle(riccardo, ciel)\nnot Venous(riccardo)\nSquab(riccardo)\nnot Evidence(riccardo, verney)\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Subserve(x, ciel))\nforall x (Premedical(x) and Venous(x) -> Squab(x))\n\nSquab(ciel)\n\nforall x (Premedical(x) and Venous(x) -> Squab(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The micheline is sunset. The marline does not eat the micheline. The marline fillet the flynn. The marline is sunset. The marline is crowning. The marline is trying. The marline is said. The marline ditch the flynn. The flynn does not eat the micheline. The flynn is not sunset. The flynn is raining. The flynn does not visit the marline. If something is raining then it enrol the micheline. All crowning, sunset things are raining. The flynn does not eat the marline.", "logic": "\nSunset(micheline)\nnot Fillet(marline, micheline)\nFillet(marline, flynn)\nSunset(marline)\nCrowning(marline)\nTrying(marline)\nSaid(marline)\nDitch(marline, flynn)\nnot Fillet(flynn, micheline)\nnot Sunset(flynn)\nRaining(flynn)\nnot Ditch(flynn, marline)\nforall x (Raining(x) -> Enrol(x, micheline))\nforall x (Crowning(x) and Sunset(x) -> Raining(x))\n\nnot Fillet(flynn, marline)\n\nnot Fillet(flynn, marline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The angelle is mucose. The charla does not eat the angelle. The charla harpoon the kali. The charla is mucose. The charla is oxidative. The charla is squandered. The charla is unended. The charla ream the kali. The kali does not eat the angelle. The kali is not mucose. The kali is trimotored. The kali does not visit the charla. If something is trimotored then it jilt the angelle. All oxidative, mucose things are trimotored. The angelle is oxidative.", "logic": "\nMucose(angelle)\nnot Harpoon(charla, angelle)\nHarpoon(charla, kali)\nMucose(charla)\nOxidative(charla)\nSquandered(charla)\nUnended(charla)\nReam(charla, kali)\nnot Harpoon(kali, angelle)\nnot Mucose(kali)\nTrimotored(kali)\nnot Ream(kali, charla)\nforall x (Trimotored(x) -> Jilt(x, angelle))\nforall x (Oxidative(x) and Mucose(x) -> Trimotored(x))\n\nOxidative(angelle)\n\nOxidative(angelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The philippe is punishable. The barb does not eat the philippe. The barb harshen the susannah. The barb is punishable. The barb is dendritic. The barb is touristy. The barb is malleable. The barb counteract the susannah. The susannah does not eat the philippe. The susannah is not punishable. The susannah is intrusive. The susannah does not visit the barb. If something is intrusive then it spelunk the philippe. All dendritic, punishable things are intrusive. The philippe does not eat the philippe.", "logic": "\nPunishable(philippe)\nnot Harshen(barb, philippe)\nHarshen(barb, susannah)\nPunishable(barb)\nDendritic(barb)\nTouristy(barb)\nMalleable(barb)\nCounteract(barb, susannah)\nnot Harshen(susannah, philippe)\nnot Punishable(susannah)\nIntrusive(susannah)\nnot Counteract(susannah, barb)\nforall x (Intrusive(x) -> Spelunk(x, philippe))\nforall x (Dendritic(x) and Punishable(x) -> Intrusive(x))\n\nnot Harshen(philippe, philippe)\n\nnot Harshen(philippe, philippe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The maryjane is imposed. The britta does not eat the maryjane. The britta cater the zelda. The britta is imposed. The britta is fetching. The britta is myeloid. The britta is sportive. The britta amputate the zelda. The zelda does not eat the maryjane. The zelda is not imposed. The zelda is earthly. The zelda does not visit the britta. If something is earthly then it cense the maryjane. All fetching, imposed things are earthly. The britta cense the zelda.", "logic": "\nImposed(maryjane)\nnot Cater(britta, maryjane)\nCater(britta, zelda)\nImposed(britta)\nFetching(britta)\nMyeloid(britta)\nSportive(britta)\nAmputate(britta, zelda)\nnot Cater(zelda, maryjane)\nnot Imposed(zelda)\nEarthly(zelda)\nnot Amputate(zelda, britta)\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Cense(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Fetching(x) and Imposed(x) -> Earthly(x))\n\nCense(britta, zelda)\n\nCense(britta, zelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1333"} {"premises": "The goldia is unscripted. The randolf is panoplied. The randolf scent the june. The june demonetise the randolf. The june scent the goldia. The june scent the randolf. The june scent the alpa. The alpa demonetise the june. The alpa is lactic. The alpa scent the randolf. If something is lactic then it regard the june. If something regard the june then it is panoplied. The randolf scent the june.", "logic": "\nUnscripted(goldia)\nPanoplied(randolf)\nScent(randolf, june)\nDemonetise(june, randolf)\nScent(june, goldia)\nScent(june, randolf)\nScent(june, alpa)\nDemonetise(alpa, june)\nLactic(alpa)\nScent(alpa, randolf)\nforall x (Lactic(x) -> Regard(x, june))\nforall x (Regard(x, june) -> Panoplied(x))\n\nScent(randolf, june)\n\ntherefore Scent(randolf, june)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The britani is foaming. The dennie is endurable. The dennie puncture the thaddeus. The thaddeus flour the dennie. The thaddeus puncture the britani. The thaddeus puncture the dennie. The thaddeus puncture the averil. The averil flour the thaddeus. The averil is jilted. The averil puncture the dennie. If something is jilted then it lucubrate the thaddeus. If something lucubrate the thaddeus then it is endurable. The averil is not jilted.", "logic": "\nFoaming(britani)\nEndurable(dennie)\nPuncture(dennie, thaddeus)\nFlour(thaddeus, dennie)\nPuncture(thaddeus, britani)\nPuncture(thaddeus, dennie)\nPuncture(thaddeus, averil)\nFlour(averil, thaddeus)\nJilted(averil)\nPuncture(averil, dennie)\nforall x (Jilted(x) -> Lucubrate(x, thaddeus))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, thaddeus) -> Endurable(x))\n\nnot Jilted(averil)\n\ntherefore Jilted(averil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The rodge is moody. The valentine is monoclonal. The valentine interpret the pinchas. The pinchas illegalise the valentine. The pinchas interpret the rodge. The pinchas interpret the valentine. The pinchas interpret the fedora. The fedora illegalise the pinchas. The fedora is epenthetic. The fedora interpret the valentine. If something is epenthetic then it secularise the pinchas. If something secularise the pinchas then it is monoclonal. The fedora secularise the pinchas.", "logic": "\nMoody(rodge)\nMonoclonal(valentine)\nInterpret(valentine, pinchas)\nIllegalise(pinchas, valentine)\nInterpret(pinchas, rodge)\nInterpret(pinchas, valentine)\nInterpret(pinchas, fedora)\nIllegalise(fedora, pinchas)\nEpenthetic(fedora)\nInterpret(fedora, valentine)\nforall x (Epenthetic(x) -> Secularise(x, pinchas))\nforall x (Secularise(x, pinchas) -> Monoclonal(x))\n\nSecularise(fedora, pinchas)\n\nEpenthetic(fedora) and forall x (Epenthetic(x) -> Secularise(x, pinchas)) -> therefore Secularise(fedora, pinchas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The aron is precocious. The anya is fueled. The anya wriggle the shannan. The shannan emend the anya. The shannan wriggle the aron. The shannan wriggle the anya. The shannan wriggle the bryn. The bryn emend the shannan. The bryn is cloisonne. The bryn wriggle the anya. If something is cloisonne then it chin the shannan. If something chin the shannan then it is fueled. The bryn does not visit the shannan.", "logic": "\nPrecocious(aron)\nFueled(anya)\nWriggle(anya, shannan)\nEmend(shannan, anya)\nWriggle(shannan, aron)\nWriggle(shannan, anya)\nWriggle(shannan, bryn)\nEmend(bryn, shannan)\nCloisonne(bryn)\nWriggle(bryn, anya)\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Chin(x, shannan))\nforall x (Chin(x, shannan) -> Fueled(x))\n\nnot Chin(bryn, shannan)\n\nCloisonne(bryn) and forall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Chin(x, shannan)) -> therefore Chin(bryn, shannan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The tova is seventy. The blake is hoarse. The blake tantalise the friedrick. The friedrick enamour the blake. The friedrick tantalise the tova. The friedrick tantalise the blake. The friedrick tantalise the isabel. The isabel enamour the friedrick. The isabel is tenebrious. The isabel tantalise the blake. If something is tenebrious then it mitigate the friedrick. If something mitigate the friedrick then it is hoarse. The isabel is hoarse.", "logic": "\nSeventy(tova)\nHoarse(blake)\nTantalise(blake, friedrick)\nEnamour(friedrick, blake)\nTantalise(friedrick, tova)\nTantalise(friedrick, blake)\nTantalise(friedrick, isabel)\nEnamour(isabel, friedrick)\nTenebrious(isabel)\nTantalise(isabel, blake)\nforall x (Tenebrious(x) -> Mitigate(x, friedrick))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, friedrick) -> Hoarse(x))\n\nHoarse(isabel)\n\nTenebrious(isabel) and forall x (Tenebrious(x) -> Mitigate(x, friedrick)) -> therefore Mitigate(isabel, friedrick) Mitigate(isabel, friedrick) and forall x (Mitigate(x, friedrick) -> Hoarse(x)) -> therefore Hoarse(isabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The astrix is recovering. The gloria is punitive. The gloria leak the javier. The javier talc the gloria. The javier leak the astrix. The javier leak the gloria. The javier leak the waly. The waly talc the javier. The waly is musky. The waly leak the gloria. If something is musky then it mind the javier. If something mind the javier then it is punitive. The waly is not punitive.", "logic": "\nRecovering(astrix)\nPunitive(gloria)\nLeak(gloria, javier)\nTalc(javier, gloria)\nLeak(javier, astrix)\nLeak(javier, gloria)\nLeak(javier, waly)\nTalc(waly, javier)\nMusky(waly)\nLeak(waly, gloria)\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Mind(x, javier))\nforall x (Mind(x, javier) -> Punitive(x))\n\nnot Punitive(waly)\n\nMusky(waly) and forall x (Musky(x) -> Mind(x, javier)) -> therefore Mind(waly, javier) Mind(waly, javier) and forall x (Mind(x, javier) -> Punitive(x)) -> therefore Punitive(waly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The merissa is cormous. The corby is unsubtle. The corby untune the jason. The jason retail the corby. The jason untune the merissa. The jason untune the corby. The jason untune the giorgia. The giorgia retail the jason. The giorgia is omani. The giorgia untune the corby. If something is omani then it reassure the jason. If something reassure the jason then it is unsubtle. The merissa is not unsubtle.", "logic": "\nCormous(merissa)\nUnsubtle(corby)\nUntune(corby, jason)\nRetail(jason, corby)\nUntune(jason, merissa)\nUntune(jason, corby)\nUntune(jason, giorgia)\nRetail(giorgia, jason)\nOmani(giorgia)\nUntune(giorgia, corby)\nforall x (Omani(x) -> Reassure(x, jason))\nforall x (Reassure(x, jason) -> Unsubtle(x))\n\nnot Unsubtle(merissa)\n\nforall x (Reassure(x, jason) -> Unsubtle(x)) <- forall x (Omani(x) -> Reassure(x, jason)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The aubrey is hitless. The gideon is receivable. The gideon connive the vitia. The vitia paste the gideon. The vitia connive the aubrey. The vitia connive the gideon. The vitia connive the sisile. The sisile paste the vitia. The sisile is resinlike. The sisile connive the gideon. If something is resinlike then it embed the vitia. If something embed the vitia then it is receivable. The gideon embed the vitia.", "logic": "\nHitless(aubrey)\nReceivable(gideon)\nConnive(gideon, vitia)\nPaste(vitia, gideon)\nConnive(vitia, aubrey)\nConnive(vitia, gideon)\nConnive(vitia, sisile)\nPaste(sisile, vitia)\nResinlike(sisile)\nConnive(sisile, gideon)\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Embed(x, vitia))\nforall x (Embed(x, vitia) -> Receivable(x))\n\nEmbed(gideon, vitia)\n\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Embed(x, vitia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The marcela is searing. The zitella is arborical. The zitella severalise the mary. The mary plumb the zitella. The mary severalise the marcela. The mary severalise the zitella. The mary severalise the lani. The lani plumb the mary. The lani is clxx. The lani severalise the zitella. If something is clxx then it outsail the mary. If something outsail the mary then it is arborical. The mary is not arborical.", "logic": "\nSearing(marcela)\nArborical(zitella)\nSeveralise(zitella, mary)\nPlumb(mary, zitella)\nSeveralise(mary, marcela)\nSeveralise(mary, zitella)\nSeveralise(mary, lani)\nPlumb(lani, mary)\nClxx(lani)\nSeveralise(lani, zitella)\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Outsail(x, mary))\nforall x (Outsail(x, mary) -> Arborical(x))\n\nnot Arborical(mary)\n\nforall x (Outsail(x, mary) -> Arborical(x)) <- forall x (Clxx(x) -> Outsail(x, mary)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The mugsy is apterous. The doralin is armlike. The doralin apostatize the rhianon. The rhianon bask the doralin. The rhianon apostatize the mugsy. The rhianon apostatize the doralin. The rhianon apostatize the sidoney. The sidoney bask the rhianon. The sidoney is nisi. The sidoney apostatize the doralin. If something is nisi then it clangor the rhianon. If something clangor the rhianon then it is armlike. The doralin apostatize the sidoney.", "logic": "\nApterous(mugsy)\nArmlike(doralin)\nApostatize(doralin, rhianon)\nBask(rhianon, doralin)\nApostatize(rhianon, mugsy)\nApostatize(rhianon, doralin)\nApostatize(rhianon, sidoney)\nBask(sidoney, rhianon)\nNisi(sidoney)\nApostatize(sidoney, doralin)\nforall x (Nisi(x) -> Clangor(x, rhianon))\nforall x (Clangor(x, rhianon) -> Armlike(x))\n\nApostatize(doralin, sidoney)\n\nApostatize(doralin, sidoney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The merci is vicarious. The bailey is fetal. The bailey clog the shawna. The shawna guttle the bailey. The shawna clog the merci. The shawna clog the bailey. The shawna clog the samuele. The samuele guttle the shawna. The samuele is dreamless. The samuele clog the bailey. If something is dreamless then it shed the shawna. If something shed the shawna then it is fetal. The shawna does not like the shawna.", "logic": "\nVicarious(merci)\nFetal(bailey)\nClog(bailey, shawna)\nGuttle(shawna, bailey)\nClog(shawna, merci)\nClog(shawna, bailey)\nClog(shawna, samuele)\nGuttle(samuele, shawna)\nDreamless(samuele)\nClog(samuele, bailey)\nforall x (Dreamless(x) -> Shed(x, shawna))\nforall x (Shed(x, shawna) -> Fetal(x))\n\nnot Clog(shawna, shawna)\n\nnot Clog(shawna, shawna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The luke is hick. The guido is denotive. The guido divine the waly. The waly mislay the guido. The waly divine the luke. The waly divine the guido. The waly divine the reube. The reube mislay the waly. The reube is revenant. The reube divine the guido. If something is revenant then it paint the waly. If something paint the waly then it is denotive. The guido paint the reube.", "logic": "\nHick(luke)\nDenotive(guido)\nDivine(guido, waly)\nMislay(waly, guido)\nDivine(waly, luke)\nDivine(waly, guido)\nDivine(waly, reube)\nMislay(reube, waly)\nRevenant(reube)\nDivine(reube, guido)\nforall x (Revenant(x) -> Paint(x, waly))\nforall x (Paint(x, waly) -> Denotive(x))\n\nPaint(guido, reube)\n\nPaint(guido, reube) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-585"} {"premises": "The paola republish the susanna. The ernst premier the theresita. The ernst is not penumbral. The ernst is desiccate. The ernst republish the paola. The ernst republish the susanna. The theresita premier the paola. The theresita is desiccate. The theresita does not see the susanna. The susanna is lanceolate. If something premier the theresita then it does not visit the theresita. If something is desiccate then it premier the theresita. The ernst is desiccate.", "logic": "\nRepublish(paola, susanna)\nPremier(ernst, theresita)\nnot Penumbral(ernst)\nDesiccate(ernst)\nRepublish(ernst, paola)\nRepublish(ernst, susanna)\nPremier(theresita, paola)\nDesiccate(theresita)\nnot Republish(theresita, susanna)\nLanceolate(susanna)\nforall x (Premier(x, theresita) -> not Outclass(x, theresita))\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> Premier(x, theresita))\n\nDesiccate(ernst)\n\ntherefore Desiccate(ernst)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The fernando unbelt the vern. The wye cackel the leif. The wye is not catchy. The wye is monestrous. The wye unbelt the fernando. The wye unbelt the vern. The leif cackel the fernando. The leif is monestrous. The leif does not see the vern. The vern is phrenic. If something cackel the leif then it does not visit the leif. If something is monestrous then it cackel the leif. The fernando does not see the vern.", "logic": "\nUnbelt(fernando, vern)\nCackel(wye, leif)\nnot Catchy(wye)\nMonestrous(wye)\nUnbelt(wye, fernando)\nUnbelt(wye, vern)\nCackel(leif, fernando)\nMonestrous(leif)\nnot Unbelt(leif, vern)\nPhrenic(vern)\nforall x (Cackel(x, leif) -> not Quetch(x, leif))\nforall x (Monestrous(x) -> Cackel(x, leif))\n\nnot Unbelt(fernando, vern)\n\ntherefore Unbelt(fernando, vern)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The mabel whistle the julienne. The aloysia altercate the reinhold. The aloysia is not gossipy. The aloysia is sellable. The aloysia whistle the mabel. The aloysia whistle the julienne. The reinhold altercate the mabel. The reinhold is sellable. The reinhold does not see the julienne. The julienne is hoarse. If something altercate the reinhold then it does not visit the reinhold. If something is sellable then it altercate the reinhold. The aloysia does not visit the reinhold.", "logic": "\nWhistle(mabel, julienne)\nAltercate(aloysia, reinhold)\nnot Gossipy(aloysia)\nSellable(aloysia)\nWhistle(aloysia, mabel)\nWhistle(aloysia, julienne)\nAltercate(reinhold, mabel)\nSellable(reinhold)\nnot Whistle(reinhold, julienne)\nHoarse(julienne)\nforall x (Altercate(x, reinhold) -> not Toenail(x, reinhold))\nforall x (Sellable(x) -> Altercate(x, reinhold))\n\nnot Toenail(aloysia, reinhold)\n\nAltercate(aloysia, reinhold) and forall x (Altercate(x, reinhold) -> not Toenail(x, reinhold)) -> therefore not Toenail(aloysia, reinhold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The marko razor the joline. The eloise mash the guthry. The eloise is not stooped. The eloise is doomed. The eloise razor the marko. The eloise razor the joline. The guthry mash the marko. The guthry is doomed. The guthry does not see the joline. The joline is spanking. If something mash the guthry then it does not visit the guthry. If something is doomed then it mash the guthry. The guthry does not eat the guthry.", "logic": "\nRazor(marko, joline)\nMash(eloise, guthry)\nnot Stooped(eloise)\nDoomed(eloise)\nRazor(eloise, marko)\nRazor(eloise, joline)\nMash(guthry, marko)\nDoomed(guthry)\nnot Razor(guthry, joline)\nSpanking(joline)\nforall x (Mash(x, guthry) -> not Distress(x, guthry))\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Mash(x, guthry))\n\nnot Mash(guthry, guthry)\n\nDoomed(guthry) and forall x (Doomed(x) -> Mash(x, guthry)) -> therefore Mash(guthry, guthry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The hirsch bellylaugh the ivonne. The netta code the jock. The netta is not lobate. The netta is squally. The netta bellylaugh the hirsch. The netta bellylaugh the ivonne. The jock code the hirsch. The jock is squally. The jock does not see the ivonne. The ivonne is seeded. If something code the jock then it does not visit the jock. If something is squally then it code the jock. The jock does not visit the jock.", "logic": "\nBellylaugh(hirsch, ivonne)\nCode(netta, jock)\nnot Lobate(netta)\nSqually(netta)\nBellylaugh(netta, hirsch)\nBellylaugh(netta, ivonne)\nCode(jock, hirsch)\nSqually(jock)\nnot Bellylaugh(jock, ivonne)\nSeeded(ivonne)\nforall x (Code(x, jock) -> not Reenforce(x, jock))\nforall x (Squally(x) -> Code(x, jock))\n\nnot Reenforce(jock, jock)\n\nSqually(jock) and forall x (Squally(x) -> Code(x, jock)) -> therefore Code(jock, jock) Code(jock, jock) and forall x (Code(x, jock) -> not Reenforce(x, jock)) -> therefore not Reenforce(jock, jock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The corabella clean the marlee. The tish exempt the kenny. The tish is not granular. The tish is pejorative. The tish clean the corabella. The tish clean the marlee. The kenny exempt the corabella. The kenny is pejorative. The kenny does not see the marlee. The marlee is cased. If something exempt the kenny then it does not visit the kenny. If something is pejorative then it exempt the kenny. The kenny solve the kenny.", "logic": "\nClean(corabella, marlee)\nExempt(tish, kenny)\nnot Granular(tish)\nPejorative(tish)\nClean(tish, corabella)\nClean(tish, marlee)\nExempt(kenny, corabella)\nPejorative(kenny)\nnot Clean(kenny, marlee)\nCased(marlee)\nforall x (Exempt(x, kenny) -> not Solve(x, kenny))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) -> Exempt(x, kenny))\n\nSolve(kenny, kenny)\n\nPejorative(kenny) and forall x (Pejorative(x) -> Exempt(x, kenny)) -> therefore Exempt(kenny, kenny) Exempt(kenny, kenny) and forall x (Exempt(x, kenny) -> not Solve(x, kenny)) -> therefore not Solve(kenny, kenny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The daisy privatise the faina. The haley edge the mozelle. The haley is not cleanable. The haley is passerine. The haley privatise the daisy. The haley privatise the faina. The mozelle edge the daisy. The mozelle is passerine. The mozelle does not see the faina. The faina is dualistic. If something edge the mozelle then it does not visit the mozelle. If something is passerine then it edge the mozelle. The daisy does not eat the mozelle.", "logic": "\nPrivatise(daisy, faina)\nEdge(haley, mozelle)\nnot Cleanable(haley)\nPasserine(haley)\nPrivatise(haley, daisy)\nPrivatise(haley, faina)\nEdge(mozelle, daisy)\nPasserine(mozelle)\nnot Privatise(mozelle, faina)\nDualistic(faina)\nforall x (Edge(x, mozelle) -> not Federalize(x, mozelle))\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Edge(x, mozelle))\n\nnot Edge(daisy, mozelle)\n\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Edge(x, mozelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The gillan roughcast the jonie. The gaynor sweat the rheba. The gaynor is not heavy. The gaynor is icteric. The gaynor roughcast the gillan. The gaynor roughcast the jonie. The rheba sweat the gillan. The rheba is icteric. The rheba does not see the jonie. The jonie is intensive. If something sweat the rheba then it does not visit the rheba. If something is icteric then it sweat the rheba. The jonie sweat the rheba.", "logic": "\nRoughcast(gillan, jonie)\nSweat(gaynor, rheba)\nnot Heavy(gaynor)\nIcteric(gaynor)\nRoughcast(gaynor, gillan)\nRoughcast(gaynor, jonie)\nSweat(rheba, gillan)\nIcteric(rheba)\nnot Roughcast(rheba, jonie)\nIntensive(jonie)\nforall x (Sweat(x, rheba) -> not Deign(x, rheba))\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> Sweat(x, rheba))\n\nSweat(jonie, rheba)\n\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> Sweat(x, rheba)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The maxwell consecrate the nikos. The nevile duplex the davoud. The nevile is not dummy. The nevile is empiric. The nevile consecrate the maxwell. The nevile consecrate the nikos. The davoud duplex the maxwell. The davoud is empiric. The davoud does not see the nikos. The nikos is faultless. If something duplex the davoud then it does not visit the davoud. If something is empiric then it duplex the davoud. The nikos does not eat the nikos.", "logic": "\nConsecrate(maxwell, nikos)\nDuplex(nevile, davoud)\nnot Dummy(nevile)\nEmpiric(nevile)\nConsecrate(nevile, maxwell)\nConsecrate(nevile, nikos)\nDuplex(davoud, maxwell)\nEmpiric(davoud)\nnot Consecrate(davoud, nikos)\nFaultless(nikos)\nforall x (Duplex(x, davoud) -> not Martyrize(x, davoud))\nforall x (Empiric(x) -> Duplex(x, davoud))\n\nnot Duplex(nikos, nikos)\n\nnot Duplex(nikos, nikos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The hellene overwork the hiralal. The deborah append the eba. The deborah is not tobagonian. The deborah is crusty. The deborah overwork the hellene. The deborah overwork the hiralal. The eba append the hellene. The eba is crusty. The eba does not see the hiralal. The hiralal is weakening. If something append the eba then it does not visit the eba. If something is crusty then it append the eba. The deborah append the hiralal.", "logic": "\nOverwork(hellene, hiralal)\nAppend(deborah, eba)\nnot Tobagonian(deborah)\nCrusty(deborah)\nOverwork(deborah, hellene)\nOverwork(deborah, hiralal)\nAppend(eba, hellene)\nCrusty(eba)\nnot Overwork(eba, hiralal)\nWeakening(hiralal)\nforall x (Append(x, eba) -> not Incinerate(x, eba))\nforall x (Crusty(x) -> Append(x, eba))\n\nAppend(deborah, hiralal)\n\nAppend(deborah, hiralal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The avrom falcon the jaine. The rodie instill the suzanna. The rodie is not bavarian. The rodie is written. The rodie falcon the avrom. The rodie falcon the jaine. The suzanna instill the avrom. The suzanna is written. The suzanna does not see the jaine. The jaine is such. If something instill the suzanna then it does not visit the suzanna. If something is written then it instill the suzanna. The avrom does not eat the rodie.", "logic": "\nFalcon(avrom, jaine)\nInstill(rodie, suzanna)\nnot Bavarian(rodie)\nWritten(rodie)\nFalcon(rodie, avrom)\nFalcon(rodie, jaine)\nInstill(suzanna, avrom)\nWritten(suzanna)\nnot Falcon(suzanna, jaine)\nSuch(jaine)\nforall x (Instill(x, suzanna) -> not Strip(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Written(x) -> Instill(x, suzanna))\n\nnot Instill(avrom, rodie)\n\nnot Instill(avrom, rodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The brande twinkle the tarzan. The ricca badger the kacy. The ricca is not ramate. The ricca is resupine. The ricca twinkle the brande. The ricca twinkle the tarzan. The kacy badger the brande. The kacy is resupine. The kacy does not see the tarzan. The tarzan is binuclear. If something badger the kacy then it does not visit the kacy. If something is resupine then it badger the kacy. The kacy is ramate.", "logic": "\nTwinkle(brande, tarzan)\nBadger(ricca, kacy)\nnot Ramate(ricca)\nResupine(ricca)\nTwinkle(ricca, brande)\nTwinkle(ricca, tarzan)\nBadger(kacy, brande)\nResupine(kacy)\nnot Twinkle(kacy, tarzan)\nBinuclear(tarzan)\nforall x (Badger(x, kacy) -> not Deny(x, kacy))\nforall x (Resupine(x) -> Badger(x, kacy))\n\nRamate(kacy)\n\nRamate(kacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-804"} {"premises": "The lyn bream the debra. The debra is geometric. The kettie bream the umeko. The umeko bream the kettie. All histologic people are geometric. If the debra allay the lyn and the debra is not nineteen then the lyn bream the umeko. Red people are amphoric. If someone is nineteen then they chase the lyn. If the umeko is geometric and the umeko allay the debra then the debra jampack the kettie. If someone is amphoric then they do not eat the kettie. The umeko bream the kettie.", "logic": "\nBream(lyn, debra)\nGeometric(debra)\nBream(kettie, umeko)\nBream(umeko, kettie)\nforall x (Histologic(x) -> Geometric(x))\nAllay(debra, lyn) and not Nineteen(debra) -> Bream(lyn, umeko)\nforall x (Geometric(x) -> Amphoric(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) -> Allay(x, lyn))\nGeometric(umeko) and Allay(umeko, debra) -> Jampack(debra, kettie)\nforall x (Amphoric(x) -> not Bream(x, kettie))\n\nBream(umeko, kettie)\n\ntherefore Bream(umeko, kettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The sauncho room the corry. The corry is tenebrific. The gertruda room the austin. The austin room the gertruda. All subsidiary people are tenebrific. If the corry macadamise the sauncho and the corry is not dank then the sauncho room the austin. Red people are wheaten. If someone is dank then they chase the sauncho. If the austin is tenebrific and the austin macadamise the corry then the corry know the gertruda. If someone is wheaten then they do not eat the gertruda. The sauncho does not eat the corry.", "logic": "\nRoom(sauncho, corry)\nTenebrific(corry)\nRoom(gertruda, austin)\nRoom(austin, gertruda)\nforall x (Subsidiary(x) -> Tenebrific(x))\nMacadamise(corry, sauncho) and not Dank(corry) -> Room(sauncho, austin)\nforall x (Tenebrific(x) -> Wheaten(x))\nforall x (Dank(x) -> Macadamise(x, sauncho))\nTenebrific(austin) and Macadamise(austin, corry) -> Know(corry, gertruda)\nforall x (Wheaten(x) -> not Room(x, gertruda))\n\nnot Room(sauncho, corry)\n\ntherefore Room(sauncho, corry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The jacky abscise the carlin. The carlin is curly. The mabel abscise the lorri. The lorri abscise the mabel. All littler people are curly. If the carlin automobile the jacky and the carlin is not averse then the jacky abscise the lorri. Red people are ratified. If someone is averse then they chase the jacky. If the lorri is curly and the lorri automobile the carlin then the carlin catabolise the mabel. If someone is ratified then they do not eat the mabel. The carlin is ratified.", "logic": "\nAbscise(jacky, carlin)\nCurly(carlin)\nAbscise(mabel, lorri)\nAbscise(lorri, mabel)\nforall x (Littler(x) -> Curly(x))\nAutomobile(carlin, jacky) and not Averse(carlin) -> Abscise(jacky, lorri)\nforall x (Curly(x) -> Ratified(x))\nforall x (Averse(x) -> Automobile(x, jacky))\nCurly(lorri) and Automobile(lorri, carlin) -> Catabolise(carlin, mabel)\nforall x (Ratified(x) -> not Abscise(x, mabel))\n\nRatified(carlin)\n\nCurly(carlin) and forall x (Curly(x) -> Ratified(x)) -> therefore Ratified(carlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The jud drink the valentine. The valentine is bedewed. The jermayne drink the apollo. The apollo drink the jermayne. All xxxi people are bedewed. If the valentine configure the jud and the valentine is not disclike then the jud drink the apollo. Red people are beamish. If someone is disclike then they chase the jud. If the apollo is bedewed and the apollo configure the valentine then the valentine stanch the jermayne. If someone is beamish then they do not eat the jermayne. The valentine is not beamish.", "logic": "\nDrink(jud, valentine)\nBedewed(valentine)\nDrink(jermayne, apollo)\nDrink(apollo, jermayne)\nforall x (Xxxi(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nConfigure(valentine, jud) and not Disclike(valentine) -> Drink(jud, apollo)\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Beamish(x))\nforall x (Disclike(x) -> Configure(x, jud))\nBedewed(apollo) and Configure(apollo, valentine) -> Stanch(valentine, jermayne)\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> not Drink(x, jermayne))\n\nnot Beamish(valentine)\n\nBedewed(valentine) and forall x (Bedewed(x) -> Beamish(x)) -> therefore Beamish(valentine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The bridgette break the wylie. The wylie is fluvial. The chery break the sibel. The sibel break the chery. All epic people are fluvial. If the wylie link the bridgette and the wylie is not annular then the bridgette break the sibel. Red people are bowery. If someone is annular then they chase the bridgette. If the sibel is fluvial and the sibel link the wylie then the wylie climb the chery. If someone is bowery then they do not eat the chery. The wylie does not eat the chery.", "logic": "\nBreak(bridgette, wylie)\nFluvial(wylie)\nBreak(chery, sibel)\nBreak(sibel, chery)\nforall x (Epic(x) -> Fluvial(x))\nLink(wylie, bridgette) and not Annular(wylie) -> Break(bridgette, sibel)\nforall x (Fluvial(x) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) -> Link(x, bridgette))\nFluvial(sibel) and Link(sibel, wylie) -> Climb(wylie, chery)\nforall x (Bowery(x) -> not Break(x, chery))\n\nnot Break(wylie, chery)\n\nFluvial(wylie) and forall x (Fluvial(x) -> Bowery(x)) -> therefore Bowery(wylie) Bowery(wylie) and forall x (Bowery(x) -> not Break(x, chery)) -> therefore not Break(wylie, chery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The rosario disenable the davina. The davina is straw. The frederica disenable the melania. The melania disenable the frederica. All romansh people are straw. If the davina higgle the rosario and the davina is not effeminate then the rosario disenable the melania. Red people are dickensian. If someone is effeminate then they chase the rosario. If the melania is straw and the melania higgle the davina then the davina revenge the frederica. If someone is dickensian then they do not eat the frederica. The davina disenable the frederica.", "logic": "\nDisenable(rosario, davina)\nStraw(davina)\nDisenable(frederica, melania)\nDisenable(melania, frederica)\nforall x (Romansh(x) -> Straw(x))\nHiggle(davina, rosario) and not Effeminate(davina) -> Disenable(rosario, melania)\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Effeminate(x) -> Higgle(x, rosario))\nStraw(melania) and Higgle(melania, davina) -> Revenge(davina, frederica)\nforall x (Dickensian(x) -> not Disenable(x, frederica))\n\nDisenable(davina, frederica)\n\nStraw(davina) and forall x (Straw(x) -> Dickensian(x)) -> therefore Dickensian(davina) Dickensian(davina) and forall x (Dickensian(x) -> not Disenable(x, frederica)) -> therefore not Disenable(davina, frederica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The page jaywalk the angelita. The angelita is luscious. The bellamy jaywalk the kristine. The kristine jaywalk the bellamy. All spent people are luscious. If the angelita moralise the page and the angelita is not limitless then the page jaywalk the kristine. Red people are orwellian. If someone is limitless then they chase the page. If the kristine is luscious and the kristine moralise the angelita then the angelita welt the bellamy. If someone is orwellian then they do not eat the bellamy. The bellamy does not chase the page.", "logic": "\nJaywalk(page, angelita)\nLuscious(angelita)\nJaywalk(bellamy, kristine)\nJaywalk(kristine, bellamy)\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Luscious(x))\nMoralise(angelita, page) and not Limitless(angelita) -> Jaywalk(page, kristine)\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> Orwellian(x))\nforall x (Limitless(x) -> Moralise(x, page))\nLuscious(kristine) and Moralise(kristine, angelita) -> Welt(angelita, bellamy)\nforall x (Orwellian(x) -> not Jaywalk(x, bellamy))\n\nnot Moralise(bellamy, page)\n\nforall x (Limitless(x) -> Moralise(x, page)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The charlton breathe the stacee. The stacee is suchlike. The chaim breathe the kenna. The kenna breathe the chaim. All miserly people are suchlike. If the stacee cart the charlton and the stacee is not andorran then the charlton breathe the kenna. Red people are araneidan. If someone is andorran then they chase the charlton. If the kenna is suchlike and the kenna cart the stacee then the stacee arbitrate the chaim. If someone is araneidan then they do not eat the chaim. The charlton is araneidan.", "logic": "\nBreathe(charlton, stacee)\nSuchlike(stacee)\nBreathe(chaim, kenna)\nBreathe(kenna, chaim)\nforall x (Miserly(x) -> Suchlike(x))\nCart(stacee, charlton) and not Andorran(stacee) -> Breathe(charlton, kenna)\nforall x (Suchlike(x) -> Araneidan(x))\nforall x (Andorran(x) -> Cart(x, charlton))\nSuchlike(kenna) and Cart(kenna, stacee) -> Arbitrate(stacee, chaim)\nforall x (Araneidan(x) -> not Breathe(x, chaim))\n\nAraneidan(charlton)\n\nforall x (Suchlike(x) -> Araneidan(x)) <- forall x (Miserly(x) -> Suchlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The meagan spue the iago. The iago is subaquatic. The sasha spue the emlyn. The emlyn spue the sasha. All acerate people are subaquatic. If the iago gallivant the meagan and the iago is not anal then the meagan spue the emlyn. Red people are wholesale. If someone is anal then they chase the meagan. If the emlyn is subaquatic and the emlyn gallivant the iago then the iago flail the sasha. If someone is wholesale then they do not eat the sasha. The iago does not chase the meagan.", "logic": "\nSpue(meagan, iago)\nSubaquatic(iago)\nSpue(sasha, emlyn)\nSpue(emlyn, sasha)\nforall x (Acerate(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\nGallivant(iago, meagan) and not Anal(iago) -> Spue(meagan, emlyn)\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Wholesale(x))\nforall x (Anal(x) -> Gallivant(x, meagan))\nSubaquatic(emlyn) and Gallivant(emlyn, iago) -> Flail(iago, sasha)\nforall x (Wholesale(x) -> not Spue(x, sasha))\n\nnot Gallivant(iago, meagan)\n\nforall x (Anal(x) -> Gallivant(x, meagan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The dickey worship the nelsen. The nelsen is bullnecked. The larine worship the vassily. The vassily worship the larine. All acheronian people are bullnecked. If the nelsen rope the dickey and the nelsen is not egotistic then the dickey worship the vassily. Red people are dejected. If someone is egotistic then they chase the dickey. If the vassily is bullnecked and the vassily rope the nelsen then the nelsen concenter the larine. If someone is dejected then they do not eat the larine. The larine worship the larine.", "logic": "\nWorship(dickey, nelsen)\nBullnecked(nelsen)\nWorship(larine, vassily)\nWorship(vassily, larine)\nforall x (Acheronian(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nRope(nelsen, dickey) and not Egotistic(nelsen) -> Worship(dickey, vassily)\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Dejected(x))\nforall x (Egotistic(x) -> Rope(x, dickey))\nBullnecked(vassily) and Rope(vassily, nelsen) -> Concenter(nelsen, larine)\nforall x (Dejected(x) -> not Worship(x, larine))\n\nWorship(larine, larine)\n\nWorship(larine, larine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The jerzy handbuild the marlow. The marlow is solitary. The avrit handbuild the janina. The janina handbuild the avrit. All improving people are solitary. If the marlow clack the jerzy and the marlow is not marauding then the jerzy handbuild the janina. Red people are brutal. If someone is marauding then they chase the jerzy. If the janina is solitary and the janina clack the marlow then the marlow jelly the avrit. If someone is brutal then they do not eat the avrit. The jerzy does not chase the avrit.", "logic": "\nHandbuild(jerzy, marlow)\nSolitary(marlow)\nHandbuild(avrit, janina)\nHandbuild(janina, avrit)\nforall x (Improving(x) -> Solitary(x))\nClack(marlow, jerzy) and not Marauding(marlow) -> Handbuild(jerzy, janina)\nforall x (Solitary(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Marauding(x) -> Clack(x, jerzy))\nSolitary(janina) and Clack(janina, marlow) -> Jelly(marlow, avrit)\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> not Handbuild(x, avrit))\n\nnot Clack(jerzy, avrit)\n\nnot Clack(jerzy, avrit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "The sonja stitch the palmer. The palmer is fazed. The hamlen stitch the blondelle. The blondelle stitch the hamlen. All punitive people are fazed. If the palmer opsonize the sonja and the palmer is not inordinate then the sonja stitch the blondelle. Red people are colorless. If someone is inordinate then they chase the sonja. If the blondelle is fazed and the blondelle opsonize the palmer then the palmer fault the hamlen. If someone is colorless then they do not eat the hamlen. The sonja fault the blondelle.", "logic": "\nStitch(sonja, palmer)\nFazed(palmer)\nStitch(hamlen, blondelle)\nStitch(blondelle, hamlen)\nforall x (Punitive(x) -> Fazed(x))\nOpsonize(palmer, sonja) and not Inordinate(palmer) -> Stitch(sonja, blondelle)\nforall x (Fazed(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Inordinate(x) -> Opsonize(x, sonja))\nFazed(blondelle) and Opsonize(blondelle, palmer) -> Fault(palmer, hamlen)\nforall x (Colorless(x) -> not Stitch(x, hamlen))\n\nFault(sonja, blondelle)\n\nFault(sonja, blondelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1964"} {"premises": "Brianne is not pitiful. Zarah is unpromised. Brice is pitiful. If someone is pitiful then they are initiative. All initiative, pitiful people are unpromised. If Zarah is variolic then Zarah is camp. Zarah is unpromised.", "logic": "\nnot Pitiful(brianne)\nUnpromised(zarah)\nPitiful(brice)\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Initiative(x) and Pitiful(x) -> Unpromised(x))\nVariolic(zarah) -> Camp(zarah)\n\nUnpromised(zarah)\n\ntherefore Unpromised(zarah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Berchtold is not unrested. Brigid is handmade. Florenza is unrested. If someone is unrested then they are throwaway. All throwaway, unrested people are handmade. If Brigid is excusatory then Brigid is favorite. Brigid is not handmade.", "logic": "\nnot Unrested(berchtold)\nHandmade(brigid)\nUnrested(florenza)\nforall x (Unrested(x) -> Throwaway(x))\nforall x (Throwaway(x) and Unrested(x) -> Handmade(x))\nExcusatory(brigid) -> Favorite(brigid)\n\nnot Handmade(brigid)\n\ntherefore Handmade(brigid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Britt is not eatable. Carlton is coaxing. Aldus is eatable. If someone is eatable then they are basaltic. All basaltic, eatable people are coaxing. If Carlton is disgusting then Carlton is congruous. Aldus is basaltic.", "logic": "\nnot Eatable(britt)\nCoaxing(carlton)\nEatable(aldus)\nforall x (Eatable(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Eatable(x) -> Coaxing(x))\nDisgusting(carlton) -> Congruous(carlton)\n\nBasaltic(aldus)\n\nEatable(aldus) and forall x (Eatable(x) -> Basaltic(x)) -> therefore Basaltic(aldus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Birgit is not sacred. Marlee is seriocomic. Renelle is sacred. If someone is sacred then they are boylike. All boylike, sacred people are seriocomic. If Marlee is regent then Marlee is floppy. Renelle is not boylike.", "logic": "\nnot Sacred(birgit)\nSeriocomic(marlee)\nSacred(renelle)\nforall x (Sacred(x) -> Boylike(x))\nforall x (Boylike(x) and Sacred(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\nRegent(marlee) -> Floppy(marlee)\n\nnot Boylike(renelle)\n\nSacred(renelle) and forall x (Sacred(x) -> Boylike(x)) -> therefore Boylike(renelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Simmonds is not galactic. Lazarus is inaudible. Emmye is galactic. If someone is galactic then they are demeaning. All demeaning, galactic people are inaudible. If Lazarus is bipartite then Lazarus is muffled. Emmye is inaudible.", "logic": "\nnot Galactic(simmonds)\nInaudible(lazarus)\nGalactic(emmye)\nforall x (Galactic(x) -> Demeaning(x))\nforall x (Demeaning(x) and Galactic(x) -> Inaudible(x))\nBipartite(lazarus) -> Muffled(lazarus)\n\nInaudible(emmye)\n\nGalactic(emmye) and forall x (Galactic(x) -> Demeaning(x)) -> therefore Demeaning(emmye) Demeaning(emmye) and Galactic(emmye) and forall x (Demeaning(x) and Galactic(x) -> Inaudible(x)) -> therefore Inaudible(emmye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Sherrie is not inelegant. Steffen is tubercular. Sammie is inelegant. If someone is inelegant then they are orthodox. All orthodox, inelegant people are tubercular. If Steffen is truculent then Steffen is ametabolic. Sammie is not tubercular.", "logic": "\nnot Inelegant(sherrie)\nTubercular(steffen)\nInelegant(sammie)\nforall x (Inelegant(x) -> Orthodox(x))\nforall x (Orthodox(x) and Inelegant(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nTruculent(steffen) -> Ametabolic(steffen)\n\nnot Tubercular(sammie)\n\nInelegant(sammie) and forall x (Inelegant(x) -> Orthodox(x)) -> therefore Orthodox(sammie) Orthodox(sammie) and Inelegant(sammie) and forall x (Orthodox(x) and Inelegant(x) -> Tubercular(x)) -> therefore Tubercular(sammie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Vikky is not vociferous. Crystie is frictional. Juanita is vociferous. If someone is vociferous then they are coseismal. All coseismal, vociferous people are frictional. If Crystie is made then Crystie is libidinal. Vikky is not frictional.", "logic": "\nnot Vociferous(vikky)\nFrictional(crystie)\nVociferous(juanita)\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) and Vociferous(x) -> Frictional(x))\nMade(crystie) -> Libidinal(crystie)\n\nnot Frictional(vikky)\n\nforall x (Coseismal(x) and Vociferous(x) -> Frictional(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Celestia is not effortless. Lemuel is hazy. Auberta is effortless. If someone is effortless then they are reported. All reported, effortless people are hazy. If Lemuel is tired then Lemuel is shambolic. Celestia is reported.", "logic": "\nnot Effortless(celestia)\nHazy(lemuel)\nEffortless(auberta)\nforall x (Effortless(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Reported(x) and Effortless(x) -> Hazy(x))\nTired(lemuel) -> Shambolic(lemuel)\n\nReported(celestia)\n\nforall x (Effortless(x) -> Reported(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Merrielle is not murine. Cherida is deaf. Julianna is murine. If someone is murine then they are mobbish. All mobbish, murine people are deaf. If Cherida is floury then Cherida is adipose. Cherida is not adipose.", "logic": "\nnot Murine(merrielle)\nDeaf(cherida)\nMurine(julianna)\nforall x (Murine(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and Murine(x) -> Deaf(x))\nFloury(cherida) -> Adipose(cherida)\n\nnot Adipose(cherida)\n\nFloury(cherida) -> Adipose(cherida) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Temp is not vocal. Chandler is punctured. Cammie is vocal. If someone is vocal then they are satiable. All satiable, vocal people are punctured. If Chandler is medium then Chandler is pharyngeal. Temp is medium.", "logic": "\nnot Vocal(temp)\nPunctured(chandler)\nVocal(cammie)\nforall x (Vocal(x) -> Satiable(x))\nforall x (Satiable(x) and Vocal(x) -> Punctured(x))\nMedium(chandler) -> Pharyngeal(chandler)\n\nMedium(temp)\n\nMedium(temp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Bevvy is not buttonlike. Giffer is bellyless. Blisse is buttonlike. If someone is buttonlike then they are costumed. All costumed, buttonlike people are bellyless. If Giffer is bicoloured then Giffer is immoderate. Giffer is not young.", "logic": "\nnot Buttonlike(bevvy)\nBellyless(giffer)\nButtonlike(blisse)\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Costumed(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Buttonlike(x) -> Bellyless(x))\nBicoloured(giffer) -> Immoderate(giffer)\n\nnot Young(giffer)\n\nnot Young(giffer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "Tiffy is not dextrorse. Lusa is arced. Lilly is dextrorse. If someone is dextrorse then they are secretive. All secretive, dextrorse people are arced. If Lusa is anginal then Lusa is pseudo. Tiffy is red.", "logic": "\nnot Dextrorse(tiffy)\nArced(lusa)\nDextrorse(lilly)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Dextrorse(x) -> Arced(x))\nAnginal(lusa) -> Pseudo(lusa)\n\nRed(tiffy)\n\nRed(tiffy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-708"} {"premises": "The toby is styleless. The toby is oscine. The toby prick the heinrich. The toby cranch the heinrich. The toby diffuse the heinrich. The heinrich is not oscine. The heinrich diffuse the toby. If someone cranch the toby then they see the heinrich. If someone cranch the heinrich then the heinrich cranch the toby. If someone cranch the heinrich then the heinrich diffuse the toby. If someone is uncomplete and not styleless then they are alimentary. If the heinrich prick the toby and the heinrich cranch the toby then the heinrich is cupular. If someone diffuse the heinrich and they do not see the toby then they do not like the toby. If someone prick the toby then the toby is not oscine. If the heinrich diffuse the toby and the heinrich does not need the toby then the toby diffuse the heinrich. The toby is styleless.", "logic": "\nStyleless(toby)\nOscine(toby)\nPrick(toby, heinrich)\nCranch(toby, heinrich)\nDiffuse(toby, heinrich)\nnot Oscine(heinrich)\nDiffuse(heinrich, toby)\nforall x (Cranch(x, toby) -> Diffuse(x, heinrich))\nforall x (Cranch(x, heinrich) -> Cranch(heinrich, toby))\nforall x (Cranch(x, heinrich) -> Diffuse(heinrich, toby))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and not Styleless(x) -> Alimentary(x))\nPrick(heinrich, toby) and Cranch(heinrich, toby) -> Cupular(heinrich)\nforall x (Diffuse(x, heinrich) and not Diffuse(x, toby) -> not Prick(x, toby))\nforall x (Prick(x, toby) -> not Oscine(toby))\nDiffuse(heinrich, toby) and not Cranch(heinrich, toby) -> Diffuse(toby, heinrich)\n\nStyleless(toby)\n\ntherefore Styleless(toby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The traver is gimpy. The traver is insurgent. The traver specify the tomiko. The traver accurse the tomiko. The traver castigate the tomiko. The tomiko is not insurgent. The tomiko castigate the traver. If someone accurse the traver then they see the tomiko. If someone accurse the tomiko then the tomiko accurse the traver. If someone accurse the tomiko then the tomiko castigate the traver. If someone is inapt and not gimpy then they are spiked. If the tomiko specify the traver and the tomiko accurse the traver then the tomiko is decent. If someone castigate the tomiko and they do not see the traver then they do not like the traver. If someone specify the traver then the traver is not insurgent. If the tomiko castigate the traver and the tomiko does not need the traver then the traver castigate the tomiko. The tomiko does not see the traver.", "logic": "\nGimpy(traver)\nInsurgent(traver)\nSpecify(traver, tomiko)\nAccurse(traver, tomiko)\nCastigate(traver, tomiko)\nnot Insurgent(tomiko)\nCastigate(tomiko, traver)\nforall x (Accurse(x, traver) -> Castigate(x, tomiko))\nforall x (Accurse(x, tomiko) -> Accurse(tomiko, traver))\nforall x (Accurse(x, tomiko) -> Castigate(tomiko, traver))\nforall x (Inapt(x) and not Gimpy(x) -> Spiked(x))\nSpecify(tomiko, traver) and Accurse(tomiko, traver) -> Decent(tomiko)\nforall x (Castigate(x, tomiko) and not Castigate(x, traver) -> not Specify(x, traver))\nforall x (Specify(x, traver) -> not Insurgent(traver))\nCastigate(tomiko, traver) and not Accurse(tomiko, traver) -> Castigate(traver, tomiko)\n\nnot Castigate(tomiko, traver)\n\ntherefore Castigate(tomiko, traver)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The amelina is articled. The amelina is nonaligned. The amelina fizzle the boris. The amelina prank the boris. The amelina proofread the boris. The boris is not nonaligned. The boris proofread the amelina. If someone prank the amelina then they see the boris. If someone prank the boris then the boris prank the amelina. If someone prank the boris then the boris proofread the amelina. If someone is malposed and not articled then they are bitterish. If the boris fizzle the amelina and the boris prank the amelina then the boris is lactic. If someone proofread the boris and they do not see the amelina then they do not like the amelina. If someone fizzle the amelina then the amelina is not nonaligned. If the boris proofread the amelina and the boris does not need the amelina then the amelina proofread the boris. The boris prank the amelina.", "logic": "\nArticled(amelina)\nNonaligned(amelina)\nFizzle(amelina, boris)\nPrank(amelina, boris)\nProofread(amelina, boris)\nnot Nonaligned(boris)\nProofread(boris, amelina)\nforall x (Prank(x, amelina) -> Proofread(x, boris))\nforall x (Prank(x, boris) -> Prank(boris, amelina))\nforall x (Prank(x, boris) -> Proofread(boris, amelina))\nforall x (Malposed(x) and not Articled(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nFizzle(boris, amelina) and Prank(boris, amelina) -> Lactic(boris)\nforall x (Proofread(x, boris) and not Proofread(x, amelina) -> not Fizzle(x, amelina))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, amelina) -> not Nonaligned(amelina))\nProofread(boris, amelina) and not Prank(boris, amelina) -> Proofread(amelina, boris)\n\nPrank(boris, amelina)\n\nPrank(amelina, boris) and forall x (Prank(x, boris) -> Prank(boris, amelina)) -> therefore Prank(boris, amelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The ardelia is nosey. The ardelia is endocrinal. The ardelia eddy the drea. The ardelia naturalize the drea. The ardelia redact the drea. The drea is not endocrinal. The drea redact the ardelia. If someone naturalize the ardelia then they see the drea. If someone naturalize the drea then the drea naturalize the ardelia. If someone naturalize the drea then the drea redact the ardelia. If someone is brainish and not nosey then they are soleless. If the drea eddy the ardelia and the drea naturalize the ardelia then the drea is damned. If someone redact the drea and they do not see the ardelia then they do not like the ardelia. If someone eddy the ardelia then the ardelia is not endocrinal. If the drea redact the ardelia and the drea does not need the ardelia then the ardelia redact the drea. The drea does not need the ardelia.", "logic": "\nNosey(ardelia)\nEndocrinal(ardelia)\nEddy(ardelia, drea)\nNaturalize(ardelia, drea)\nRedact(ardelia, drea)\nnot Endocrinal(drea)\nRedact(drea, ardelia)\nforall x (Naturalize(x, ardelia) -> Redact(x, drea))\nforall x (Naturalize(x, drea) -> Naturalize(drea, ardelia))\nforall x (Naturalize(x, drea) -> Redact(drea, ardelia))\nforall x (Brainish(x) and not Nosey(x) -> Soleless(x))\nEddy(drea, ardelia) and Naturalize(drea, ardelia) -> Damned(drea)\nforall x (Redact(x, drea) and not Redact(x, ardelia) -> not Eddy(x, ardelia))\nforall x (Eddy(x, ardelia) -> not Endocrinal(ardelia))\nRedact(drea, ardelia) and not Naturalize(drea, ardelia) -> Redact(ardelia, drea)\n\nnot Naturalize(drea, ardelia)\n\nNaturalize(ardelia, drea) and forall x (Naturalize(x, drea) -> Naturalize(drea, ardelia)) -> therefore Naturalize(drea, ardelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The carlene is appetent. The carlene is viii. The carlene bunch the elsa. The carlene gear the elsa. The carlene fleer the elsa. The elsa is not viii. The elsa fleer the carlene. If someone gear the carlene then they see the elsa. If someone gear the elsa then the elsa gear the carlene. If someone gear the elsa then the elsa fleer the carlene. If someone is antitumour and not appetent then they are bicornuous. If the elsa bunch the carlene and the elsa gear the carlene then the elsa is saclike. If someone fleer the elsa and they do not see the carlene then they do not like the carlene. If someone bunch the carlene then the carlene is not viii. If the elsa fleer the carlene and the elsa does not need the carlene then the carlene fleer the elsa. The elsa fleer the elsa.", "logic": "\nAppetent(carlene)\nViii(carlene)\nBunch(carlene, elsa)\nGear(carlene, elsa)\nFleer(carlene, elsa)\nnot Viii(elsa)\nFleer(elsa, carlene)\nforall x (Gear(x, carlene) -> Fleer(x, elsa))\nforall x (Gear(x, elsa) -> Gear(elsa, carlene))\nforall x (Gear(x, elsa) -> Fleer(elsa, carlene))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) and not Appetent(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nBunch(elsa, carlene) and Gear(elsa, carlene) -> Saclike(elsa)\nforall x (Fleer(x, elsa) and not Fleer(x, carlene) -> not Bunch(x, carlene))\nforall x (Bunch(x, carlene) -> not Viii(carlene))\nFleer(elsa, carlene) and not Gear(elsa, carlene) -> Fleer(carlene, elsa)\n\nFleer(elsa, elsa)\n\nGear(carlene, elsa) and forall x (Gear(x, elsa) -> Gear(elsa, carlene)) -> therefore Gear(elsa, carlene) Gear(elsa, carlene) and forall x (Gear(x, carlene) -> Fleer(x, elsa)) -> therefore Fleer(elsa, elsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The dasi is blessed. The dasi is tailless. The dasi modulate the heinrich. The dasi reappraise the heinrich. The dasi ravel the heinrich. The heinrich is not tailless. The heinrich ravel the dasi. If someone reappraise the dasi then they see the heinrich. If someone reappraise the heinrich then the heinrich reappraise the dasi. If someone reappraise the heinrich then the heinrich ravel the dasi. If someone is doable and not blessed then they are attained. If the heinrich modulate the dasi and the heinrich reappraise the dasi then the heinrich is heraldist. If someone ravel the heinrich and they do not see the dasi then they do not like the dasi. If someone modulate the dasi then the dasi is not tailless. If the heinrich ravel the dasi and the heinrich does not need the dasi then the dasi ravel the heinrich. The heinrich does not see the heinrich.", "logic": "\nBlessed(dasi)\nTailless(dasi)\nModulate(dasi, heinrich)\nReappraise(dasi, heinrich)\nRavel(dasi, heinrich)\nnot Tailless(heinrich)\nRavel(heinrich, dasi)\nforall x (Reappraise(x, dasi) -> Ravel(x, heinrich))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, heinrich) -> Reappraise(heinrich, dasi))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, heinrich) -> Ravel(heinrich, dasi))\nforall x (Doable(x) and not Blessed(x) -> Attained(x))\nModulate(heinrich, dasi) and Reappraise(heinrich, dasi) -> Heraldist(heinrich)\nforall x (Ravel(x, heinrich) and not Ravel(x, dasi) -> not Modulate(x, dasi))\nforall x (Modulate(x, dasi) -> not Tailless(dasi))\nRavel(heinrich, dasi) and not Reappraise(heinrich, dasi) -> Ravel(dasi, heinrich)\n\nnot Ravel(heinrich, heinrich)\n\nReappraise(dasi, heinrich) and forall x (Reappraise(x, heinrich) -> Reappraise(heinrich, dasi)) -> therefore Reappraise(heinrich, dasi) Reappraise(heinrich, dasi) and forall x (Reappraise(x, dasi) -> Ravel(x, heinrich)) -> therefore Ravel(heinrich, heinrich)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The baxter is scorching. The baxter is virtuoso. The baxter prompt the dan. The baxter callous the dan. The baxter scallop the dan. The dan is not virtuoso. The dan scallop the baxter. If someone callous the baxter then they see the dan. If someone callous the dan then the dan callous the baxter. If someone callous the dan then the dan scallop the baxter. If someone is unshaken and not scorching then they are silverish. If the dan prompt the baxter and the dan callous the baxter then the dan is ibsenian. If someone scallop the dan and they do not see the baxter then they do not like the baxter. If someone prompt the baxter then the baxter is not virtuoso. If the dan scallop the baxter and the dan does not need the baxter then the baxter scallop the dan. The dan is not silverish.", "logic": "\nScorching(baxter)\nVirtuoso(baxter)\nPrompt(baxter, dan)\nCallous(baxter, dan)\nScallop(baxter, dan)\nnot Virtuoso(dan)\nScallop(dan, baxter)\nforall x (Callous(x, baxter) -> Scallop(x, dan))\nforall x (Callous(x, dan) -> Callous(dan, baxter))\nforall x (Callous(x, dan) -> Scallop(dan, baxter))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) and not Scorching(x) -> Silverish(x))\nPrompt(dan, baxter) and Callous(dan, baxter) -> Ibsenian(dan)\nforall x (Scallop(x, dan) and not Scallop(x, baxter) -> not Prompt(x, baxter))\nforall x (Prompt(x, baxter) -> not Virtuoso(baxter))\nScallop(dan, baxter) and not Callous(dan, baxter) -> Scallop(baxter, dan)\n\nnot Silverish(dan)\n\nforall x (Unshaken(x) and not Scorching(x) -> Silverish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The adorne is flagging. The adorne is jordanian. The adorne crosshatch the carla. The adorne seine the carla. The adorne outstrip the carla. The carla is not jordanian. The carla outstrip the adorne. If someone seine the adorne then they see the carla. If someone seine the carla then the carla seine the adorne. If someone seine the carla then the carla outstrip the adorne. If someone is maidenly and not flagging then they are polished. If the carla crosshatch the adorne and the carla seine the adorne then the carla is inviting. If someone outstrip the carla and they do not see the adorne then they do not like the adorne. If someone crosshatch the adorne then the adorne is not jordanian. If the carla outstrip the adorne and the carla does not need the adorne then the adorne outstrip the carla. The adorne is polished.", "logic": "\nFlagging(adorne)\nJordanian(adorne)\nCrosshatch(adorne, carla)\nSeine(adorne, carla)\nOutstrip(adorne, carla)\nnot Jordanian(carla)\nOutstrip(carla, adorne)\nforall x (Seine(x, adorne) -> Outstrip(x, carla))\nforall x (Seine(x, carla) -> Seine(carla, adorne))\nforall x (Seine(x, carla) -> Outstrip(carla, adorne))\nforall x (Maidenly(x) and not Flagging(x) -> Polished(x))\nCrosshatch(carla, adorne) and Seine(carla, adorne) -> Inviting(carla)\nforall x (Outstrip(x, carla) and not Outstrip(x, adorne) -> not Crosshatch(x, adorne))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, adorne) -> not Jordanian(adorne))\nOutstrip(carla, adorne) and not Seine(carla, adorne) -> Outstrip(adorne, carla)\n\nPolished(adorne)\n\nforall x (Maidenly(x) and not Flagging(x) -> Polished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The tildi is exceeding. The tildi is nilpotent. The tildi mush the cathie. The tildi reject the cathie. The tildi whomp the cathie. The cathie is not nilpotent. The cathie whomp the tildi. If someone reject the tildi then they see the cathie. If someone reject the cathie then the cathie reject the tildi. If someone reject the cathie then the cathie whomp the tildi. If someone is joking and not exceeding then they are roaring. If the cathie mush the tildi and the cathie reject the tildi then the cathie is unreadable. If someone whomp the cathie and they do not see the tildi then they do not like the tildi. If someone mush the tildi then the tildi is not nilpotent. If the cathie whomp the tildi and the cathie does not need the tildi then the tildi whomp the cathie. The cathie is not unreadable.", "logic": "\nExceeding(tildi)\nNilpotent(tildi)\nMush(tildi, cathie)\nReject(tildi, cathie)\nWhomp(tildi, cathie)\nnot Nilpotent(cathie)\nWhomp(cathie, tildi)\nforall x (Reject(x, tildi) -> Whomp(x, cathie))\nforall x (Reject(x, cathie) -> Reject(cathie, tildi))\nforall x (Reject(x, cathie) -> Whomp(cathie, tildi))\nforall x (Joking(x) and not Exceeding(x) -> Roaring(x))\nMush(cathie, tildi) and Reject(cathie, tildi) -> Unreadable(cathie)\nforall x (Whomp(x, cathie) and not Whomp(x, tildi) -> not Mush(x, tildi))\nforall x (Mush(x, tildi) -> not Nilpotent(tildi))\nWhomp(cathie, tildi) and not Reject(cathie, tildi) -> Whomp(tildi, cathie)\n\nnot Unreadable(cathie)\n\nMush(cathie, tildi) and Reject(cathie, tildi) -> Unreadable(cathie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The berny is costly. The berny is trying. The berny disenchant the glynnis. The berny unbind the glynnis. The berny siphon the glynnis. The glynnis is not trying. The glynnis siphon the berny. If someone unbind the berny then they see the glynnis. If someone unbind the glynnis then the glynnis unbind the berny. If someone unbind the glynnis then the glynnis siphon the berny. If someone is foursquare and not costly then they are informed. If the glynnis disenchant the berny and the glynnis unbind the berny then the glynnis is synclinal. If someone siphon the glynnis and they do not see the berny then they do not like the berny. If someone disenchant the berny then the berny is not trying. If the glynnis siphon the berny and the glynnis does not need the berny then the berny siphon the glynnis. The berny is foursquare.", "logic": "\nCostly(berny)\nTrying(berny)\nDisenchant(berny, glynnis)\nUnbind(berny, glynnis)\nSiphon(berny, glynnis)\nnot Trying(glynnis)\nSiphon(glynnis, berny)\nforall x (Unbind(x, berny) -> Siphon(x, glynnis))\nforall x (Unbind(x, glynnis) -> Unbind(glynnis, berny))\nforall x (Unbind(x, glynnis) -> Siphon(glynnis, berny))\nforall x (Foursquare(x) and not Costly(x) -> Informed(x))\nDisenchant(glynnis, berny) and Unbind(glynnis, berny) -> Synclinal(glynnis)\nforall x (Siphon(x, glynnis) and not Siphon(x, berny) -> not Disenchant(x, berny))\nforall x (Disenchant(x, berny) -> not Trying(berny))\nSiphon(glynnis, berny) and not Unbind(glynnis, berny) -> Siphon(berny, glynnis)\n\nFoursquare(berny)\n\nFoursquare(berny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The calla is gullible. The calla is napoleonic. The calla fracture the morissa. The calla iodize the morissa. The calla congeal the morissa. The morissa is not napoleonic. The morissa congeal the calla. If someone iodize the calla then they see the morissa. If someone iodize the morissa then the morissa iodize the calla. If someone iodize the morissa then the morissa congeal the calla. If someone is likely and not gullible then they are tenebrific. If the morissa fracture the calla and the morissa iodize the calla then the morissa is exclusive. If someone congeal the morissa and they do not see the calla then they do not like the calla. If someone fracture the calla then the calla is not napoleonic. If the morissa congeal the calla and the morissa does not need the calla then the calla congeal the morissa. The calla does not like the calla.", "logic": "\nGullible(calla)\nNapoleonic(calla)\nFracture(calla, morissa)\nIodize(calla, morissa)\nCongeal(calla, morissa)\nnot Napoleonic(morissa)\nCongeal(morissa, calla)\nforall x (Iodize(x, calla) -> Congeal(x, morissa))\nforall x (Iodize(x, morissa) -> Iodize(morissa, calla))\nforall x (Iodize(x, morissa) -> Congeal(morissa, calla))\nforall x (Likely(x) and not Gullible(x) -> Tenebrific(x))\nFracture(morissa, calla) and Iodize(morissa, calla) -> Exclusive(morissa)\nforall x (Congeal(x, morissa) and not Congeal(x, calla) -> not Fracture(x, calla))\nforall x (Fracture(x, calla) -> not Napoleonic(calla))\nCongeal(morissa, calla) and not Iodize(morissa, calla) -> Congeal(calla, morissa)\n\nnot Fracture(calla, calla)\n\nnot Fracture(calla, calla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The weston is exothermic. The weston is titillated. The weston corner the marna. The weston echo the marna. The weston loiter the marna. The marna is not titillated. The marna loiter the weston. If someone echo the weston then they see the marna. If someone echo the marna then the marna echo the weston. If someone echo the marna then the marna loiter the weston. If someone is fimbriate and not exothermic then they are punishing. If the marna corner the weston and the marna echo the weston then the marna is phoney. If someone loiter the marna and they do not see the weston then they do not like the weston. If someone corner the weston then the weston is not titillated. If the marna loiter the weston and the marna does not need the weston then the weston loiter the marna. The marna is fimbriate.", "logic": "\nExothermic(weston)\nTitillated(weston)\nCorner(weston, marna)\nEcho(weston, marna)\nLoiter(weston, marna)\nnot Titillated(marna)\nLoiter(marna, weston)\nforall x (Echo(x, weston) -> Loiter(x, marna))\nforall x (Echo(x, marna) -> Echo(marna, weston))\nforall x (Echo(x, marna) -> Loiter(marna, weston))\nforall x (Fimbriate(x) and not Exothermic(x) -> Punishing(x))\nCorner(marna, weston) and Echo(marna, weston) -> Phoney(marna)\nforall x (Loiter(x, marna) and not Loiter(x, weston) -> not Corner(x, weston))\nforall x (Corner(x, weston) -> not Titillated(weston))\nLoiter(marna, weston) and not Echo(marna, weston) -> Loiter(weston, marna)\n\nFimbriate(marna)\n\nFimbriate(marna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-133"} {"premises": "The prudy topple the guillaume. The guillaume vegetate the lonnie. The guillaume vegetate the istvan. The guillaume is selected. The guillaume stalk the lonnie. The guillaume stalk the istvan. The guillaume topple the lonnie. The lonnie vegetate the prudy. The lonnie stalk the istvan. The istvan vegetate the prudy. The istvan vegetate the guillaume. The istvan vegetate the lonnie. The istvan is myalgic. The istvan is redeeming. The istvan topple the prudy. If something stalk the lonnie then it stalk the guillaume. If something is ascribable and selected then it stalk the prudy. If something stalk the lonnie and it stalk the guillaume then it vegetate the prudy. The guillaume topple the lonnie.", "logic": "\nTopple(prudy, guillaume)\nVegetate(guillaume, lonnie)\nVegetate(guillaume, istvan)\nSelected(guillaume)\nStalk(guillaume, lonnie)\nStalk(guillaume, istvan)\nTopple(guillaume, lonnie)\nVegetate(lonnie, prudy)\nStalk(lonnie, istvan)\nVegetate(istvan, prudy)\nVegetate(istvan, guillaume)\nVegetate(istvan, lonnie)\nMyalgic(istvan)\nRedeeming(istvan)\nTopple(istvan, prudy)\nforall x (Stalk(x, lonnie) -> Stalk(x, guillaume))\nforall x (Ascribable(x) and Selected(x) -> Stalk(x, prudy))\nforall x (Stalk(x, lonnie) and Stalk(x, guillaume) -> Vegetate(x, prudy))\n\nTopple(guillaume, lonnie)\n\ntherefore Topple(guillaume, lonnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The mariellen swob the clemmy. The clemmy overshadow the erica. The clemmy overshadow the dora. The clemmy is harmonized. The clemmy unionize the erica. The clemmy unionize the dora. The clemmy swob the erica. The erica overshadow the mariellen. The erica unionize the dora. The dora overshadow the mariellen. The dora overshadow the clemmy. The dora overshadow the erica. The dora is catalatic. The dora is diestrous. The dora swob the mariellen. If something unionize the erica then it unionize the clemmy. If something is unrequited and harmonized then it unionize the mariellen. If something unionize the erica and it unionize the clemmy then it overshadow the mariellen. The erica does not need the dora.", "logic": "\nSwob(mariellen, clemmy)\nOvershadow(clemmy, erica)\nOvershadow(clemmy, dora)\nHarmonized(clemmy)\nUnionize(clemmy, erica)\nUnionize(clemmy, dora)\nSwob(clemmy, erica)\nOvershadow(erica, mariellen)\nUnionize(erica, dora)\nOvershadow(dora, mariellen)\nOvershadow(dora, clemmy)\nOvershadow(dora, erica)\nCatalatic(dora)\nDiestrous(dora)\nSwob(dora, mariellen)\nforall x (Unionize(x, erica) -> Unionize(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Unrequited(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Unionize(x, mariellen))\nforall x (Unionize(x, erica) and Unionize(x, clemmy) -> Overshadow(x, mariellen))\n\nnot Unionize(erica, dora)\n\ntherefore Unionize(erica, dora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The virgil sadden the shanda. The shanda castrate the wilburt. The shanda castrate the geo. The shanda is divisional. The shanda batch the wilburt. The shanda batch the geo. The shanda sadden the wilburt. The wilburt castrate the virgil. The wilburt batch the geo. The geo castrate the virgil. The geo castrate the shanda. The geo castrate the wilburt. The geo is rearmost. The geo is dressed. The geo sadden the virgil. If something batch the wilburt then it batch the shanda. If something is polyphase and divisional then it batch the virgil. If something batch the wilburt and it batch the shanda then it castrate the virgil. The shanda batch the shanda.", "logic": "\nSadden(virgil, shanda)\nCastrate(shanda, wilburt)\nCastrate(shanda, geo)\nDivisional(shanda)\nBatch(shanda, wilburt)\nBatch(shanda, geo)\nSadden(shanda, wilburt)\nCastrate(wilburt, virgil)\nBatch(wilburt, geo)\nCastrate(geo, virgil)\nCastrate(geo, shanda)\nCastrate(geo, wilburt)\nRearmost(geo)\nDressed(geo)\nSadden(geo, virgil)\nforall x (Batch(x, wilburt) -> Batch(x, shanda))\nforall x (Polyphase(x) and Divisional(x) -> Batch(x, virgil))\nforall x (Batch(x, wilburt) and Batch(x, shanda) -> Castrate(x, virgil))\n\nBatch(shanda, shanda)\n\nBatch(shanda, wilburt) and forall x (Batch(x, wilburt) -> Batch(x, shanda)) -> therefore Batch(shanda, shanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The garp bewray the corky. The corky blot the almira. The corky blot the claresta. The corky is alluvial. The corky distend the almira. The corky distend the claresta. The corky bewray the almira. The almira blot the garp. The almira distend the claresta. The claresta blot the garp. The claresta blot the corky. The claresta blot the almira. The claresta is said. The claresta is handed. The claresta bewray the garp. If something distend the almira then it distend the corky. If something is eolithic and alluvial then it distend the garp. If something distend the almira and it distend the corky then it blot the garp. The corky does not need the corky.", "logic": "\nBewray(garp, corky)\nBlot(corky, almira)\nBlot(corky, claresta)\nAlluvial(corky)\nDistend(corky, almira)\nDistend(corky, claresta)\nBewray(corky, almira)\nBlot(almira, garp)\nDistend(almira, claresta)\nBlot(claresta, garp)\nBlot(claresta, corky)\nBlot(claresta, almira)\nSaid(claresta)\nHanded(claresta)\nBewray(claresta, garp)\nforall x (Distend(x, almira) -> Distend(x, corky))\nforall x (Eolithic(x) and Alluvial(x) -> Distend(x, garp))\nforall x (Distend(x, almira) and Distend(x, corky) -> Blot(x, garp))\n\nnot Distend(corky, corky)\n\nDistend(corky, almira) and forall x (Distend(x, almira) -> Distend(x, corky)) -> therefore Distend(corky, corky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The lance secernate the tammy. The tammy womanize the paulette. The tammy womanize the mignonne. The tammy is assumed. The tammy validate the paulette. The tammy validate the mignonne. The tammy secernate the paulette. The paulette womanize the lance. The paulette validate the mignonne. The mignonne womanize the lance. The mignonne womanize the tammy. The mignonne womanize the paulette. The mignonne is idiopathic. The mignonne is alpha. The mignonne secernate the lance. If something validate the paulette then it validate the tammy. If something is cacuminal and assumed then it validate the lance. If something validate the paulette and it validate the tammy then it womanize the lance. The tammy womanize the lance.", "logic": "\nSecernate(lance, tammy)\nWomanize(tammy, paulette)\nWomanize(tammy, mignonne)\nAssumed(tammy)\nValidate(tammy, paulette)\nValidate(tammy, mignonne)\nSecernate(tammy, paulette)\nWomanize(paulette, lance)\nValidate(paulette, mignonne)\nWomanize(mignonne, lance)\nWomanize(mignonne, tammy)\nWomanize(mignonne, paulette)\nIdiopathic(mignonne)\nAlpha(mignonne)\nSecernate(mignonne, lance)\nforall x (Validate(x, paulette) -> Validate(x, tammy))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Assumed(x) -> Validate(x, lance))\nforall x (Validate(x, paulette) and Validate(x, tammy) -> Womanize(x, lance))\n\nWomanize(tammy, lance)\n\nValidate(tammy, paulette) and forall x (Validate(x, paulette) -> Validate(x, tammy)) -> therefore Validate(tammy, tammy) Validate(tammy, paulette) and Validate(tammy, tammy) and forall x (Validate(x, paulette) and Validate(x, tammy) -> Womanize(x, lance)) -> therefore Womanize(tammy, lance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The ronnie retouch the roberta. The roberta decimalise the jasmina. The roberta decimalise the cornelia. The roberta is sunbaked. The roberta flocculate the jasmina. The roberta flocculate the cornelia. The roberta retouch the jasmina. The jasmina decimalise the ronnie. The jasmina flocculate the cornelia. The cornelia decimalise the ronnie. The cornelia decimalise the roberta. The cornelia decimalise the jasmina. The cornelia is queenlike. The cornelia is dropping. The cornelia retouch the ronnie. If something flocculate the jasmina then it flocculate the roberta. If something is wartlike and sunbaked then it flocculate the ronnie. If something flocculate the jasmina and it flocculate the roberta then it decimalise the ronnie. The roberta does not eat the ronnie.", "logic": "\nRetouch(ronnie, roberta)\nDecimalise(roberta, jasmina)\nDecimalise(roberta, cornelia)\nSunbaked(roberta)\nFlocculate(roberta, jasmina)\nFlocculate(roberta, cornelia)\nRetouch(roberta, jasmina)\nDecimalise(jasmina, ronnie)\nFlocculate(jasmina, cornelia)\nDecimalise(cornelia, ronnie)\nDecimalise(cornelia, roberta)\nDecimalise(cornelia, jasmina)\nQueenlike(cornelia)\nDropping(cornelia)\nRetouch(cornelia, ronnie)\nforall x (Flocculate(x, jasmina) -> Flocculate(x, roberta))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) and Sunbaked(x) -> Flocculate(x, ronnie))\nforall x (Flocculate(x, jasmina) and Flocculate(x, roberta) -> Decimalise(x, ronnie))\n\nnot Decimalise(roberta, ronnie)\n\nFlocculate(roberta, jasmina) and forall x (Flocculate(x, jasmina) -> Flocculate(x, roberta)) -> therefore Flocculate(roberta, roberta) Flocculate(roberta, jasmina) and Flocculate(roberta, roberta) and forall x (Flocculate(x, jasmina) and Flocculate(x, roberta) -> Decimalise(x, ronnie)) -> therefore Decimalise(roberta, ronnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The piper intumesce the alayne. The alayne typeset the herculie. The alayne typeset the farrah. The alayne is auricular. The alayne flight the herculie. The alayne flight the farrah. The alayne intumesce the herculie. The herculie typeset the piper. The herculie flight the farrah. The farrah typeset the piper. The farrah typeset the alayne. The farrah typeset the herculie. The farrah is suckled. The farrah is hunted. The farrah intumesce the piper. If something flight the herculie then it flight the alayne. If something is grudging and auricular then it flight the piper. If something flight the herculie and it flight the alayne then it typeset the piper. The farrah does not need the piper.", "logic": "\nIntumesce(piper, alayne)\nTypeset(alayne, herculie)\nTypeset(alayne, farrah)\nAuricular(alayne)\nFlight(alayne, herculie)\nFlight(alayne, farrah)\nIntumesce(alayne, herculie)\nTypeset(herculie, piper)\nFlight(herculie, farrah)\nTypeset(farrah, piper)\nTypeset(farrah, alayne)\nTypeset(farrah, herculie)\nSuckled(farrah)\nHunted(farrah)\nIntumesce(farrah, piper)\nforall x (Flight(x, herculie) -> Flight(x, alayne))\nforall x (Grudging(x) and Auricular(x) -> Flight(x, piper))\nforall x (Flight(x, herculie) and Flight(x, alayne) -> Typeset(x, piper))\n\nnot Flight(farrah, piper)\n\nforall x (Grudging(x) and Auricular(x) -> Flight(x, piper)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The joelynn dethrone the tracee. The tracee triumph the grissel. The tracee triumph the imojean. The tracee is tetanic. The tracee falter the grissel. The tracee falter the imojean. The tracee dethrone the grissel. The grissel triumph the joelynn. The grissel falter the imojean. The imojean triumph the joelynn. The imojean triumph the tracee. The imojean triumph the grissel. The imojean is annelidan. The imojean is elusive. The imojean dethrone the joelynn. If something falter the grissel then it falter the tracee. If something is comforting and tetanic then it falter the joelynn. If something falter the grissel and it falter the tracee then it triumph the joelynn. The tracee falter the joelynn.", "logic": "\nDethrone(joelynn, tracee)\nTriumph(tracee, grissel)\nTriumph(tracee, imojean)\nTetanic(tracee)\nFalter(tracee, grissel)\nFalter(tracee, imojean)\nDethrone(tracee, grissel)\nTriumph(grissel, joelynn)\nFalter(grissel, imojean)\nTriumph(imojean, joelynn)\nTriumph(imojean, tracee)\nTriumph(imojean, grissel)\nAnnelidan(imojean)\nElusive(imojean)\nDethrone(imojean, joelynn)\nforall x (Falter(x, grissel) -> Falter(x, tracee))\nforall x (Comforting(x) and Tetanic(x) -> Falter(x, joelynn))\nforall x (Falter(x, grissel) and Falter(x, tracee) -> Triumph(x, joelynn))\n\nFalter(tracee, joelynn)\n\nforall x (Comforting(x) and Tetanic(x) -> Falter(x, joelynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The dannie wager the richie. The richie perfuse the davidson. The richie perfuse the marketa. The richie is unplayful. The richie playact the davidson. The richie playact the marketa. The richie wager the davidson. The davidson perfuse the dannie. The davidson playact the marketa. The marketa perfuse the dannie. The marketa perfuse the richie. The marketa perfuse the davidson. The marketa is menstrual. The marketa is rearing. The marketa wager the dannie. If something playact the davidson then it playact the richie. If something is lxiv and unplayful then it playact the dannie. If something playact the davidson and it playact the richie then it perfuse the dannie. The marketa does not need the richie.", "logic": "\nWager(dannie, richie)\nPerfuse(richie, davidson)\nPerfuse(richie, marketa)\nUnplayful(richie)\nPlayact(richie, davidson)\nPlayact(richie, marketa)\nWager(richie, davidson)\nPerfuse(davidson, dannie)\nPlayact(davidson, marketa)\nPerfuse(marketa, dannie)\nPerfuse(marketa, richie)\nPerfuse(marketa, davidson)\nMenstrual(marketa)\nRearing(marketa)\nWager(marketa, dannie)\nforall x (Playact(x, davidson) -> Playact(x, richie))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) and Unplayful(x) -> Playact(x, dannie))\nforall x (Playact(x, davidson) and Playact(x, richie) -> Perfuse(x, dannie))\n\nnot Playact(marketa, richie)\n\nforall x (Playact(x, davidson) -> Playact(x, richie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The fannie airbrush the lester. The lester inhibit the giralda. The lester inhibit the malynda. The lester is snub. The lester decode the giralda. The lester decode the malynda. The lester airbrush the giralda. The giralda inhibit the fannie. The giralda decode the malynda. The malynda inhibit the fannie. The malynda inhibit the lester. The malynda inhibit the giralda. The malynda is spiderly. The malynda is minimum. The malynda airbrush the fannie. If something decode the giralda then it decode the lester. If something is riled and snub then it decode the fannie. If something decode the giralda and it decode the lester then it inhibit the fannie. The giralda airbrush the lester.", "logic": "\nAirbrush(fannie, lester)\nInhibit(lester, giralda)\nInhibit(lester, malynda)\nSnub(lester)\nDecode(lester, giralda)\nDecode(lester, malynda)\nAirbrush(lester, giralda)\nInhibit(giralda, fannie)\nDecode(giralda, malynda)\nInhibit(malynda, fannie)\nInhibit(malynda, lester)\nInhibit(malynda, giralda)\nSpiderly(malynda)\nMinimum(malynda)\nAirbrush(malynda, fannie)\nforall x (Decode(x, giralda) -> Decode(x, lester))\nforall x (Riled(x) and Snub(x) -> Decode(x, fannie))\nforall x (Decode(x, giralda) and Decode(x, lester) -> Inhibit(x, fannie))\n\nAirbrush(giralda, lester)\n\nAirbrush(giralda, lester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The roxanna cache the oreste. The oreste carbonate the wanda. The oreste carbonate the theresa. The oreste is wireless. The oreste handwrite the wanda. The oreste handwrite the theresa. The oreste cache the wanda. The wanda carbonate the roxanna. The wanda handwrite the theresa. The theresa carbonate the roxanna. The theresa carbonate the oreste. The theresa carbonate the wanda. The theresa is bermudan. The theresa is haitian. The theresa cache the roxanna. If something handwrite the wanda then it handwrite the oreste. If something is resentful and wireless then it handwrite the roxanna. If something handwrite the wanda and it handwrite the oreste then it carbonate the roxanna. The roxanna does not see the roxanna.", "logic": "\nCache(roxanna, oreste)\nCarbonate(oreste, wanda)\nCarbonate(oreste, theresa)\nWireless(oreste)\nHandwrite(oreste, wanda)\nHandwrite(oreste, theresa)\nCache(oreste, wanda)\nCarbonate(wanda, roxanna)\nHandwrite(wanda, theresa)\nCarbonate(theresa, roxanna)\nCarbonate(theresa, oreste)\nCarbonate(theresa, wanda)\nBermudan(theresa)\nHaitian(theresa)\nCache(theresa, roxanna)\nforall x (Handwrite(x, wanda) -> Handwrite(x, oreste))\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Wireless(x) -> Handwrite(x, roxanna))\nforall x (Handwrite(x, wanda) and Handwrite(x, oreste) -> Carbonate(x, roxanna))\n\nnot Cache(roxanna, roxanna)\n\nnot Cache(roxanna, roxanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The arlina revert the pamela. The pamela intermix the lauree. The pamela intermix the tybie. The pamela is cramped. The pamela ruminate the lauree. The pamela ruminate the tybie. The pamela revert the lauree. The lauree intermix the arlina. The lauree ruminate the tybie. The tybie intermix the arlina. The tybie intermix the pamela. The tybie intermix the lauree. The tybie is peeved. The tybie is proustian. The tybie revert the arlina. If something ruminate the lauree then it ruminate the pamela. If something is weaponed and cramped then it ruminate the arlina. If something ruminate the lauree and it ruminate the pamela then it intermix the arlina. The pamela revert the arlina.", "logic": "\nRevert(arlina, pamela)\nIntermix(pamela, lauree)\nIntermix(pamela, tybie)\nCramped(pamela)\nRuminate(pamela, lauree)\nRuminate(pamela, tybie)\nRevert(pamela, lauree)\nIntermix(lauree, arlina)\nRuminate(lauree, tybie)\nIntermix(tybie, arlina)\nIntermix(tybie, pamela)\nIntermix(tybie, lauree)\nPeeved(tybie)\nProustian(tybie)\nRevert(tybie, arlina)\nforall x (Ruminate(x, lauree) -> Ruminate(x, pamela))\nforall x (Weaponed(x) and Cramped(x) -> Ruminate(x, arlina))\nforall x (Ruminate(x, lauree) and Ruminate(x, pamela) -> Intermix(x, arlina))\n\nRevert(pamela, arlina)\n\nRevert(pamela, arlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-382"} {"premises": "The maryanne rotate the deva. The maryanne is sleeved. The maryanne concenter the deva. The maryanne reallot the fonz. The fonz rotate the maryanne. The fonz is condign. The fonz is astounded. The fonz is sleeved. The fonz concenter the deva. The fonz reallot the maryanne. The fonz reallot the deva. The deva rotate the fonz. The deva is astounded. The deva is sleeved. The deva reallot the maryanne. The deva reallot the fonz. If someone rotate the maryanne then they eat the deva. If someone rotate the deva and the deva is astounded then they are grasping. The fonz concenter the deva.", "logic": "\nRotate(maryanne, deva)\nSleeved(maryanne)\nConcenter(maryanne, deva)\nReallot(maryanne, fonz)\nRotate(fonz, maryanne)\nCondign(fonz)\nAstounded(fonz)\nSleeved(fonz)\nConcenter(fonz, deva)\nReallot(fonz, maryanne)\nReallot(fonz, deva)\nRotate(deva, fonz)\nAstounded(deva)\nSleeved(deva)\nReallot(deva, maryanne)\nReallot(deva, fonz)\nforall x (Rotate(x, maryanne) -> Rotate(x, deva))\nforall x (Rotate(x, deva) and Astounded(deva) -> Grasping(x))\n\nConcenter(fonz, deva)\n\ntherefore Concenter(fonz, deva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The eric abate the aggie. The eric is senescent. The eric slice the aggie. The eric brominate the adria. The adria abate the eric. The adria is sinistral. The adria is gleeful. The adria is senescent. The adria slice the aggie. The adria brominate the eric. The adria brominate the aggie. The aggie abate the adria. The aggie is gleeful. The aggie is senescent. The aggie brominate the eric. The aggie brominate the adria. If someone abate the eric then they eat the aggie. If someone abate the aggie and the aggie is gleeful then they are coarse. The aggie does not eat the adria.", "logic": "\nAbate(eric, aggie)\nSenescent(eric)\nSlice(eric, aggie)\nBrominate(eric, adria)\nAbate(adria, eric)\nSinistral(adria)\nGleeful(adria)\nSenescent(adria)\nSlice(adria, aggie)\nBrominate(adria, eric)\nBrominate(adria, aggie)\nAbate(aggie, adria)\nGleeful(aggie)\nSenescent(aggie)\nBrominate(aggie, eric)\nBrominate(aggie, adria)\nforall x (Abate(x, eric) -> Abate(x, aggie))\nforall x (Abate(x, aggie) and Gleeful(aggie) -> Coarse(x))\n\nnot Abate(aggie, adria)\n\ntherefore Abate(aggie, adria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The nelia lambast the daisey. The nelia is adulterate. The nelia pluralise the daisey. The nelia whicker the win. The win lambast the nelia. The win is straggling. The win is squinty. The win is adulterate. The win pluralise the daisey. The win whicker the nelia. The win whicker the daisey. The daisey lambast the win. The daisey is squinty. The daisey is adulterate. The daisey whicker the nelia. The daisey whicker the win. If someone lambast the nelia then they eat the daisey. If someone lambast the daisey and the daisey is squinty then they are admittible. The nelia is admittible.", "logic": "\nLambast(nelia, daisey)\nAdulterate(nelia)\nPluralise(nelia, daisey)\nWhicker(nelia, win)\nLambast(win, nelia)\nStraggling(win)\nSquinty(win)\nAdulterate(win)\nPluralise(win, daisey)\nWhicker(win, nelia)\nWhicker(win, daisey)\nLambast(daisey, win)\nSquinty(daisey)\nAdulterate(daisey)\nWhicker(daisey, nelia)\nWhicker(daisey, win)\nforall x (Lambast(x, nelia) -> Lambast(x, daisey))\nforall x (Lambast(x, daisey) and Squinty(daisey) -> Admittible(x))\n\nAdmittible(nelia)\n\nLambast(nelia, daisey) and Squinty(daisey) and forall x (Lambast(x, daisey) and Squinty(daisey) -> Admittible(x)) -> therefore Admittible(nelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The dara hack the winifred. The dara is lacy. The dara flock the winifred. The dara shoot the johann. The johann hack the dara. The johann is purblind. The johann is mongol. The johann is lacy. The johann flock the winifred. The johann shoot the dara. The johann shoot the winifred. The winifred hack the johann. The winifred is mongol. The winifred is lacy. The winifred shoot the dara. The winifred shoot the johann. If someone hack the dara then they eat the winifred. If someone hack the winifred and the winifred is mongol then they are bungaloid. The dara is not bungaloid.", "logic": "\nHack(dara, winifred)\nLacy(dara)\nFlock(dara, winifred)\nShoot(dara, johann)\nHack(johann, dara)\nPurblind(johann)\nMongol(johann)\nLacy(johann)\nFlock(johann, winifred)\nShoot(johann, dara)\nShoot(johann, winifred)\nHack(winifred, johann)\nMongol(winifred)\nLacy(winifred)\nShoot(winifred, dara)\nShoot(winifred, johann)\nforall x (Hack(x, dara) -> Hack(x, winifred))\nforall x (Hack(x, winifred) and Mongol(winifred) -> Bungaloid(x))\n\nnot Bungaloid(dara)\n\nHack(dara, winifred) and Mongol(winifred) and forall x (Hack(x, winifred) and Mongol(winifred) -> Bungaloid(x)) -> therefore Bungaloid(dara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The dara accompany the pryce. The dara is antidromic. The dara dismiss the pryce. The dara plastinate the katrinka. The katrinka accompany the dara. The katrinka is fanged. The katrinka is pugnacious. The katrinka is antidromic. The katrinka dismiss the pryce. The katrinka plastinate the dara. The katrinka plastinate the pryce. The pryce accompany the katrinka. The pryce is pugnacious. The pryce is antidromic. The pryce plastinate the dara. The pryce plastinate the katrinka. If someone accompany the dara then they eat the pryce. If someone accompany the pryce and the pryce is pugnacious then they are amoristic. The katrinka is amoristic.", "logic": "\nAccompany(dara, pryce)\nAntidromic(dara)\nDismiss(dara, pryce)\nPlastinate(dara, katrinka)\nAccompany(katrinka, dara)\nFanged(katrinka)\nPugnacious(katrinka)\nAntidromic(katrinka)\nDismiss(katrinka, pryce)\nPlastinate(katrinka, dara)\nPlastinate(katrinka, pryce)\nAccompany(pryce, katrinka)\nPugnacious(pryce)\nAntidromic(pryce)\nPlastinate(pryce, dara)\nPlastinate(pryce, katrinka)\nforall x (Accompany(x, dara) -> Accompany(x, pryce))\nforall x (Accompany(x, pryce) and Pugnacious(pryce) -> Amoristic(x))\n\nAmoristic(katrinka)\n\nAccompany(katrinka, dara) and forall x (Accompany(x, dara) -> Accompany(x, pryce)) -> therefore Accompany(katrinka, pryce) Accompany(katrinka, pryce) and Pugnacious(pryce) and forall x (Accompany(x, pryce) and Pugnacious(pryce) -> Amoristic(x)) -> therefore Amoristic(katrinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The kia flux the kate. The kia is preventive. The kia dote the kate. The kia intensify the rosella. The rosella flux the kia. The rosella is catatonic. The rosella is mensural. The rosella is preventive. The rosella dote the kate. The rosella intensify the kia. The rosella intensify the kate. The kate flux the rosella. The kate is mensural. The kate is preventive. The kate intensify the kia. The kate intensify the rosella. If someone flux the kia then they eat the kate. If someone flux the kate and the kate is mensural then they are withdrawn. The rosella is not withdrawn.", "logic": "\nFlux(kia, kate)\nPreventive(kia)\nDote(kia, kate)\nIntensify(kia, rosella)\nFlux(rosella, kia)\nCatatonic(rosella)\nMensural(rosella)\nPreventive(rosella)\nDote(rosella, kate)\nIntensify(rosella, kia)\nIntensify(rosella, kate)\nFlux(kate, rosella)\nMensural(kate)\nPreventive(kate)\nIntensify(kate, kia)\nIntensify(kate, rosella)\nforall x (Flux(x, kia) -> Flux(x, kate))\nforall x (Flux(x, kate) and Mensural(kate) -> Withdrawn(x))\n\nnot Withdrawn(rosella)\n\nFlux(rosella, kia) and forall x (Flux(x, kia) -> Flux(x, kate)) -> therefore Flux(rosella, kate) Flux(rosella, kate) and Mensural(kate) and forall x (Flux(x, kate) and Mensural(kate) -> Withdrawn(x)) -> therefore Withdrawn(rosella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The gerrilee bewilder the kath. The gerrilee is hominian. The gerrilee minstrel the kath. The gerrilee cumulate the thaddus. The thaddus bewilder the gerrilee. The thaddus is confusing. The thaddus is unswerving. The thaddus is hominian. The thaddus minstrel the kath. The thaddus cumulate the gerrilee. The thaddus cumulate the kath. The kath bewilder the thaddus. The kath is unswerving. The kath is hominian. The kath cumulate the gerrilee. The kath cumulate the thaddus. If someone bewilder the gerrilee then they eat the kath. If someone bewilder the kath and the kath is unswerving then they are ineligible. The kath is not ineligible.", "logic": "\nBewilder(gerrilee, kath)\nHominian(gerrilee)\nMinstrel(gerrilee, kath)\nCumulate(gerrilee, thaddus)\nBewilder(thaddus, gerrilee)\nConfusing(thaddus)\nUnswerving(thaddus)\nHominian(thaddus)\nMinstrel(thaddus, kath)\nCumulate(thaddus, gerrilee)\nCumulate(thaddus, kath)\nBewilder(kath, thaddus)\nUnswerving(kath)\nHominian(kath)\nCumulate(kath, gerrilee)\nCumulate(kath, thaddus)\nforall x (Bewilder(x, gerrilee) -> Bewilder(x, kath))\nforall x (Bewilder(x, kath) and Unswerving(kath) -> Ineligible(x))\n\nnot Ineligible(kath)\n\nforall x (Bewilder(x, kath) and Unswerving(kath) -> Ineligible(x)) <- forall x (Bewilder(x, gerrilee) -> Bewilder(x, kath)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The jef commingle the bea. The jef is hegelian. The jef encounter the bea. The jef incur the dasi. The dasi commingle the jef. The dasi is accretive. The dasi is blocked. The dasi is hegelian. The dasi encounter the bea. The dasi incur the jef. The dasi incur the bea. The bea commingle the dasi. The bea is blocked. The bea is hegelian. The bea incur the jef. The bea incur the dasi. If someone commingle the jef then they eat the bea. If someone commingle the bea and the bea is blocked then they are lamented. The bea commingle the bea.", "logic": "\nCommingle(jef, bea)\nHegelian(jef)\nEncounter(jef, bea)\nIncur(jef, dasi)\nCommingle(dasi, jef)\nAccretive(dasi)\nBlocked(dasi)\nHegelian(dasi)\nEncounter(dasi, bea)\nIncur(dasi, jef)\nIncur(dasi, bea)\nCommingle(bea, dasi)\nBlocked(bea)\nHegelian(bea)\nIncur(bea, jef)\nIncur(bea, dasi)\nforall x (Commingle(x, jef) -> Commingle(x, bea))\nforall x (Commingle(x, bea) and Blocked(bea) -> Lamented(x))\n\nCommingle(bea, bea)\n\nforall x (Commingle(x, jef) -> Commingle(x, bea)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The davoud misdemean the pauline. The davoud is incurved. The davoud arch the pauline. The davoud allegorise the carmelina. The carmelina misdemean the davoud. The carmelina is spikelike. The carmelina is unearthly. The carmelina is incurved. The carmelina arch the pauline. The carmelina allegorise the davoud. The carmelina allegorise the pauline. The pauline misdemean the carmelina. The pauline is unearthly. The pauline is incurved. The pauline allegorise the davoud. The pauline allegorise the carmelina. If someone misdemean the davoud then they eat the pauline. If someone misdemean the pauline and the pauline is unearthly then they are fluffy. The pauline does not eat the davoud.", "logic": "\nMisdemean(davoud, pauline)\nIncurved(davoud)\nArch(davoud, pauline)\nAllegorise(davoud, carmelina)\nMisdemean(carmelina, davoud)\nSpikelike(carmelina)\nUnearthly(carmelina)\nIncurved(carmelina)\nArch(carmelina, pauline)\nAllegorise(carmelina, davoud)\nAllegorise(carmelina, pauline)\nMisdemean(pauline, carmelina)\nUnearthly(pauline)\nIncurved(pauline)\nAllegorise(pauline, davoud)\nAllegorise(pauline, carmelina)\nforall x (Misdemean(x, davoud) -> Misdemean(x, pauline))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, pauline) and Unearthly(pauline) -> Fluffy(x))\n\nnot Misdemean(pauline, davoud)\n\nnot Misdemean(pauline, davoud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The dan buzz the ramona. The dan is cornish. The dan poison the ramona. The dan enclose the ford. The ford buzz the dan. The ford is euclidean. The ford is multiform. The ford is cornish. The ford poison the ramona. The ford enclose the dan. The ford enclose the ramona. The ramona buzz the ford. The ramona is multiform. The ramona is cornish. The ramona enclose the dan. The ramona enclose the ford. If someone buzz the dan then they eat the ramona. If someone buzz the ramona and the ramona is multiform then they are gauntleted. The dan is multiform.", "logic": "\nBuzz(dan, ramona)\nCornish(dan)\nPoison(dan, ramona)\nEnclose(dan, ford)\nBuzz(ford, dan)\nEuclidean(ford)\nMultiform(ford)\nCornish(ford)\nPoison(ford, ramona)\nEnclose(ford, dan)\nEnclose(ford, ramona)\nBuzz(ramona, ford)\nMultiform(ramona)\nCornish(ramona)\nEnclose(ramona, dan)\nEnclose(ramona, ford)\nforall x (Buzz(x, dan) -> Buzz(x, ramona))\nforall x (Buzz(x, ramona) and Multiform(ramona) -> Gauntleted(x))\n\nMultiform(dan)\n\nMultiform(dan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The wynton tremble the janette. The wynton is leaden. The wynton joggle the janette. The wynton punctuate the aidan. The aidan tremble the wynton. The aidan is proved. The aidan is consuming. The aidan is leaden. The aidan joggle the janette. The aidan punctuate the wynton. The aidan punctuate the janette. The janette tremble the aidan. The janette is consuming. The janette is leaden. The janette punctuate the wynton. The janette punctuate the aidan. If someone tremble the wynton then they eat the janette. If someone tremble the janette and the janette is consuming then they are mature. The janette is not proved.", "logic": "\nTremble(wynton, janette)\nLeaden(wynton)\nJoggle(wynton, janette)\nPunctuate(wynton, aidan)\nTremble(aidan, wynton)\nProved(aidan)\nConsuming(aidan)\nLeaden(aidan)\nJoggle(aidan, janette)\nPunctuate(aidan, wynton)\nPunctuate(aidan, janette)\nTremble(janette, aidan)\nConsuming(janette)\nLeaden(janette)\nPunctuate(janette, wynton)\nPunctuate(janette, aidan)\nforall x (Tremble(x, wynton) -> Tremble(x, janette))\nforall x (Tremble(x, janette) and Consuming(janette) -> Mature(x))\n\nnot Proved(janette)\n\nnot Proved(janette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "The terese rehouse the talbot. The terese is romanian. The terese decree the talbot. The terese incur the daphene. The daphene rehouse the terese. The daphene is swagger. The daphene is cocksure. The daphene is romanian. The daphene decree the talbot. The daphene incur the terese. The daphene incur the talbot. The talbot rehouse the daphene. The talbot is cocksure. The talbot is romanian. The talbot incur the terese. The talbot incur the daphene. If someone rehouse the terese then they eat the talbot. If someone rehouse the talbot and the talbot is cocksure then they are ersatz. The terese is swagger.", "logic": "\nRehouse(terese, talbot)\nRomanian(terese)\nDecree(terese, talbot)\nIncur(terese, daphene)\nRehouse(daphene, terese)\nSwagger(daphene)\nCocksure(daphene)\nRomanian(daphene)\nDecree(daphene, talbot)\nIncur(daphene, terese)\nIncur(daphene, talbot)\nRehouse(talbot, daphene)\nCocksure(talbot)\nRomanian(talbot)\nIncur(talbot, terese)\nIncur(talbot, daphene)\nforall x (Rehouse(x, terese) -> Rehouse(x, talbot))\nforall x (Rehouse(x, talbot) and Cocksure(talbot) -> Ersatz(x))\n\nSwagger(terese)\n\nSwagger(terese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-636"} {"premises": "Shelly is magnetised. Shelly is braced. Shelly is not forceless. Jeana is tibetan. Jeana is forceless. Ellette is tibetan. Ellette is not forceless. Irvine is stalinist. Irvine is tibetan. Irvine is forceless. If Irvine is tuberous and Irvine is stalinist then Irvine is not tibetan. If someone is ecdemic then they are magnetised. All forceless people are ecdemic. Cold people are tibetan. If Shelly is not ecdemic then Shelly is not braced. If Shelly is not tibetan then Shelly is tuberous. Irvine is tibetan.", "logic": "\nMagnetised(shelly)\nBraced(shelly)\nnot Forceless(shelly)\nTibetan(jeana)\nForceless(jeana)\nTibetan(ellette)\nnot Forceless(ellette)\nStalinist(irvine)\nTibetan(irvine)\nForceless(irvine)\nTuberous(irvine) and Stalinist(irvine) -> not Tibetan(irvine)\nforall x (Ecdemic(x) -> Magnetised(x))\nforall x (Forceless(x) -> Ecdemic(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) -> Tibetan(x))\nnot Ecdemic(shelly) -> not Braced(shelly)\nnot Tibetan(shelly) -> Tuberous(shelly)\n\nTibetan(irvine)\n\ntherefore Tibetan(irvine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Annmarie is endocrine. Annmarie is postpartum. Annmarie is not frangible. Jilli is bumptious. Jilli is frangible. Steffen is bumptious. Steffen is not frangible. Avrit is liverish. Avrit is bumptious. Avrit is frangible. If Avrit is ironshod and Avrit is liverish then Avrit is not bumptious. If someone is unsocial then they are endocrine. All frangible people are unsocial. Cold people are bumptious. If Annmarie is not unsocial then Annmarie is not postpartum. If Annmarie is not bumptious then Annmarie is ironshod. Avrit is not liverish.", "logic": "\nEndocrine(annmarie)\nPostpartum(annmarie)\nnot Frangible(annmarie)\nBumptious(jilli)\nFrangible(jilli)\nBumptious(steffen)\nnot Frangible(steffen)\nLiverish(avrit)\nBumptious(avrit)\nFrangible(avrit)\nIronshod(avrit) and Liverish(avrit) -> not Bumptious(avrit)\nforall x (Unsocial(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Unsocial(x))\nforall x (Endocrine(x) -> Bumptious(x))\nnot Unsocial(annmarie) -> not Postpartum(annmarie)\nnot Bumptious(annmarie) -> Ironshod(annmarie)\n\nnot Liverish(avrit)\n\ntherefore Liverish(avrit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Adelle is distrait. Adelle is sybaritic. Adelle is not difficult. Junia is peeved. Junia is difficult. Sarah is peeved. Sarah is not difficult. Ruby is unbordered. Ruby is peeved. Ruby is difficult. If Ruby is driving and Ruby is unbordered then Ruby is not peeved. If someone is sinitic then they are distrait. All difficult people are sinitic. Cold people are peeved. If Adelle is not sinitic then Adelle is not sybaritic. If Adelle is not peeved then Adelle is driving. Junia is sinitic.", "logic": "\nDistrait(adelle)\nSybaritic(adelle)\nnot Difficult(adelle)\nPeeved(junia)\nDifficult(junia)\nPeeved(sarah)\nnot Difficult(sarah)\nUnbordered(ruby)\nPeeved(ruby)\nDifficult(ruby)\nDriving(ruby) and Unbordered(ruby) -> not Peeved(ruby)\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Distrait(x))\nforall x (Difficult(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Distrait(x) -> Peeved(x))\nnot Sinitic(adelle) -> not Sybaritic(adelle)\nnot Peeved(adelle) -> Driving(adelle)\n\nSinitic(junia)\n\nDifficult(junia) and forall x (Difficult(x) -> Sinitic(x)) -> therefore Sinitic(junia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Dennie is corrigible. Dennie is discrete. Dennie is not carpeted. Zelma is bragging. Zelma is carpeted. Abagael is bragging. Abagael is not carpeted. Klara is mortgaged. Klara is bragging. Klara is carpeted. If Klara is cutting and Klara is mortgaged then Klara is not bragging. If someone is succulent then they are corrigible. All carpeted people are succulent. Cold people are bragging. If Dennie is not succulent then Dennie is not discrete. If Dennie is not bragging then Dennie is cutting. Dennie is not bragging.", "logic": "\nCorrigible(dennie)\nDiscrete(dennie)\nnot Carpeted(dennie)\nBragging(zelma)\nCarpeted(zelma)\nBragging(abagael)\nnot Carpeted(abagael)\nMortgaged(klara)\nBragging(klara)\nCarpeted(klara)\nCutting(klara) and Mortgaged(klara) -> not Bragging(klara)\nforall x (Succulent(x) -> Corrigible(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Succulent(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) -> Bragging(x))\nnot Succulent(dennie) -> not Discrete(dennie)\nnot Bragging(dennie) -> Cutting(dennie)\n\nnot Bragging(dennie)\n\nCorrigible(dennie) and forall x (Corrigible(x) -> Bragging(x)) -> therefore Bragging(dennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Tamarah is xlii. Tamarah is sounding. Tamarah is not snowy. Stefanie is fragile. Stefanie is snowy. Coretta is fragile. Coretta is not snowy. Graeme is northbound. Graeme is fragile. Graeme is snowy. If Graeme is southeast and Graeme is northbound then Graeme is not fragile. If someone is untroubled then they are xlii. All snowy people are untroubled. Cold people are fragile. If Tamarah is not untroubled then Tamarah is not sounding. If Tamarah is not fragile then Tamarah is southeast. Stefanie is xlii.", "logic": "\nXlii(tamarah)\nSounding(tamarah)\nnot Snowy(tamarah)\nFragile(stefanie)\nSnowy(stefanie)\nFragile(coretta)\nnot Snowy(coretta)\nNorthbound(graeme)\nFragile(graeme)\nSnowy(graeme)\nSoutheast(graeme) and Northbound(graeme) -> not Fragile(graeme)\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Snowy(x) -> Untroubled(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Fragile(x))\nnot Untroubled(tamarah) -> not Sounding(tamarah)\nnot Fragile(tamarah) -> Southeast(tamarah)\n\nXlii(stefanie)\n\nSnowy(stefanie) and forall x (Snowy(x) -> Untroubled(x)) -> therefore Untroubled(stefanie) Untroubled(stefanie) and forall x (Untroubled(x) -> Xlii(x)) -> therefore Xlii(stefanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Jeanelle is appressed. Jeanelle is bunchy. Jeanelle is not deathless. Alysia is acaudal. Alysia is deathless. Stephanus is acaudal. Stephanus is not deathless. Jaquith is droopy. Jaquith is acaudal. Jaquith is deathless. If Jaquith is cursorial and Jaquith is droopy then Jaquith is not acaudal. If someone is choked then they are appressed. All deathless people are choked. Cold people are acaudal. If Jeanelle is not choked then Jeanelle is not bunchy. If Jeanelle is not acaudal then Jeanelle is cursorial. Alysia is not appressed.", "logic": "\nAppressed(jeanelle)\nBunchy(jeanelle)\nnot Deathless(jeanelle)\nAcaudal(alysia)\nDeathless(alysia)\nAcaudal(stephanus)\nnot Deathless(stephanus)\nDroopy(jaquith)\nAcaudal(jaquith)\nDeathless(jaquith)\nCursorial(jaquith) and Droopy(jaquith) -> not Acaudal(jaquith)\nforall x (Choked(x) -> Appressed(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Choked(x))\nforall x (Appressed(x) -> Acaudal(x))\nnot Choked(jeanelle) -> not Bunchy(jeanelle)\nnot Acaudal(jeanelle) -> Cursorial(jeanelle)\n\nnot Appressed(alysia)\n\nDeathless(alysia) and forall x (Deathless(x) -> Choked(x)) -> therefore Choked(alysia) Choked(alysia) and forall x (Choked(x) -> Appressed(x)) -> therefore Appressed(alysia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Georgina is kooky. Georgina is forgetful. Georgina is not unvarying. Marlowe is undreamt. Marlowe is unvarying. Ambrosius is undreamt. Ambrosius is not unvarying. Harwell is podgy. Harwell is undreamt. Harwell is unvarying. If Harwell is macedonian and Harwell is podgy then Harwell is not undreamt. If someone is woozy then they are kooky. All unvarying people are woozy. Cold people are undreamt. If Georgina is not woozy then Georgina is not forgetful. If Georgina is not undreamt then Georgina is macedonian. Ambrosius is not woozy.", "logic": "\nKooky(georgina)\nForgetful(georgina)\nnot Unvarying(georgina)\nUndreamt(marlowe)\nUnvarying(marlowe)\nUndreamt(ambrosius)\nnot Unvarying(ambrosius)\nPodgy(harwell)\nUndreamt(harwell)\nUnvarying(harwell)\nMacedonian(harwell) and Podgy(harwell) -> not Undreamt(harwell)\nforall x (Woozy(x) -> Kooky(x))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) -> Woozy(x))\nforall x (Kooky(x) -> Undreamt(x))\nnot Woozy(georgina) -> not Forgetful(georgina)\nnot Undreamt(georgina) -> Macedonian(georgina)\n\nnot Woozy(ambrosius)\n\nforall x (Unvarying(x) -> Woozy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Arielle is binaural. Arielle is draughty. Arielle is not everyday. Calypso is effeminate. Calypso is everyday. Teodor is effeminate. Teodor is not everyday. Harlan is prudential. Harlan is effeminate. Harlan is everyday. If Harlan is unicuspid and Harlan is prudential then Harlan is not effeminate. If someone is outright then they are binaural. All everyday people are outright. Cold people are effeminate. If Arielle is not outright then Arielle is not draughty. If Arielle is not effeminate then Arielle is unicuspid. Arielle is unicuspid.", "logic": "\nBinaural(arielle)\nDraughty(arielle)\nnot Everyday(arielle)\nEffeminate(calypso)\nEveryday(calypso)\nEffeminate(teodor)\nnot Everyday(teodor)\nPrudential(harlan)\nEffeminate(harlan)\nEveryday(harlan)\nUnicuspid(harlan) and Prudential(harlan) -> not Effeminate(harlan)\nforall x (Outright(x) -> Binaural(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) -> Outright(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Effeminate(x))\nnot Outright(arielle) -> not Draughty(arielle)\nnot Effeminate(arielle) -> Unicuspid(arielle)\n\nUnicuspid(arielle)\n\nnot Effeminate(arielle) -> Unicuspid(arielle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Wynnie is ametabolic. Wynnie is unreported. Wynnie is not chiasmic. Hazel is crenulated. Hazel is chiasmic. Aimil is crenulated. Aimil is not chiasmic. Marji is numeric. Marji is crenulated. Marji is chiasmic. If Marji is sporty and Marji is numeric then Marji is not crenulated. If someone is taurine then they are ametabolic. All chiasmic people are taurine. Cold people are crenulated. If Wynnie is not taurine then Wynnie is not unreported. If Wynnie is not crenulated then Wynnie is sporty. Wynnie is not taurine.", "logic": "\nAmetabolic(wynnie)\nUnreported(wynnie)\nnot Chiasmic(wynnie)\nCrenulated(hazel)\nChiasmic(hazel)\nCrenulated(aimil)\nnot Chiasmic(aimil)\nNumeric(marji)\nCrenulated(marji)\nChiasmic(marji)\nSporty(marji) and Numeric(marji) -> not Crenulated(marji)\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Ametabolic(x))\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Taurine(x))\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) -> Crenulated(x))\nnot Taurine(wynnie) -> not Unreported(wynnie)\nnot Crenulated(wynnie) -> Sporty(wynnie)\n\nnot Taurine(wynnie)\n\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Taurine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Raymund is carbonous. Raymund is both. Raymund is not catching. Kelcie is undulant. Kelcie is catching. Kania is undulant. Kania is not catching. Mauritz is demanding. Mauritz is undulant. Mauritz is catching. If Mauritz is offensive and Mauritz is demanding then Mauritz is not undulant. If someone is semisweet then they are carbonous. All catching people are semisweet. Cold people are undulant. If Raymund is not semisweet then Raymund is not both. If Raymund is not undulant then Raymund is offensive. Kania is both.", "logic": "\nCarbonous(raymund)\nBoth(raymund)\nnot Catching(raymund)\nUndulant(kelcie)\nCatching(kelcie)\nUndulant(kania)\nnot Catching(kania)\nDemanding(mauritz)\nUndulant(mauritz)\nCatching(mauritz)\nOffensive(mauritz) and Demanding(mauritz) -> not Undulant(mauritz)\nforall x (Semisweet(x) -> Carbonous(x))\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Semisweet(x))\nforall x (Carbonous(x) -> Undulant(x))\nnot Semisweet(raymund) -> not Both(raymund)\nnot Undulant(raymund) -> Offensive(raymund)\n\nBoth(kania)\n\nBoth(kania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Hyacintha is piano. Hyacintha is xxiii. Hyacintha is not derogatory. Peyton is tyrannic. Peyton is derogatory. Marcia is tyrannic. Marcia is not derogatory. Eadith is cuplike. Eadith is tyrannic. Eadith is derogatory. If Eadith is nectarous and Eadith is cuplike then Eadith is not tyrannic. If someone is starving then they are piano. All derogatory people are starving. Cold people are tyrannic. If Hyacintha is not starving then Hyacintha is not xxiii. If Hyacintha is not tyrannic then Hyacintha is nectarous. Peyton is not nectarous.", "logic": "\nPiano(hyacintha)\nXxiii(hyacintha)\nnot Derogatory(hyacintha)\nTyrannic(peyton)\nDerogatory(peyton)\nTyrannic(marcia)\nnot Derogatory(marcia)\nCuplike(eadith)\nTyrannic(eadith)\nDerogatory(eadith)\nNectarous(eadith) and Cuplike(eadith) -> not Tyrannic(eadith)\nforall x (Starving(x) -> Piano(x))\nforall x (Derogatory(x) -> Starving(x))\nforall x (Piano(x) -> Tyrannic(x))\nnot Starving(hyacintha) -> not Xxiii(hyacintha)\nnot Tyrannic(hyacintha) -> Nectarous(hyacintha)\n\nnot Nectarous(peyton)\n\nnot Nectarous(peyton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "Glen is angolan. Glen is unquiet. Glen is not sabbatic. Valentia is acrobatic. Valentia is sabbatic. Leeanne is acrobatic. Leeanne is not sabbatic. Reid is zeroth. Reid is acrobatic. Reid is sabbatic. If Reid is northward and Reid is zeroth then Reid is not acrobatic. If someone is unitary then they are angolan. All sabbatic people are unitary. Cold people are acrobatic. If Glen is not unitary then Glen is not unquiet. If Glen is not acrobatic then Glen is northward. Glen is zeroth.", "logic": "\nAngolan(glen)\nUnquiet(glen)\nnot Sabbatic(glen)\nAcrobatic(valentia)\nSabbatic(valentia)\nAcrobatic(leeanne)\nnot Sabbatic(leeanne)\nZeroth(reid)\nAcrobatic(reid)\nSabbatic(reid)\nNorthward(reid) and Zeroth(reid) -> not Acrobatic(reid)\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Angolan(x))\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Unitary(x))\nforall x (Angolan(x) -> Acrobatic(x))\nnot Unitary(glen) -> not Unquiet(glen)\nnot Acrobatic(glen) -> Northward(glen)\n\nZeroth(glen)\n\nZeroth(glen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2245"} {"premises": "The kristina mend the stearne. The stearne furcate the doralia. The forester furcate the doralia. The doralia is stilly. If something furcate the doralia then it is nonliteral. If something is nonliteral then it mend the kristina. The doralia is stilly.", "logic": "\nMend(kristina, stearne)\nFurcate(stearne, doralia)\nFurcate(forester, doralia)\nStilly(doralia)\nforall x (Furcate(x, doralia) -> Nonliteral(x))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Mend(x, kristina))\n\nStilly(doralia)\n\ntherefore Stilly(doralia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The zorro demoralise the zerk. The zerk pamper the lindsey. The nikolai pamper the lindsey. The lindsey is unfeigned. If something pamper the lindsey then it is gandhian. If something is gandhian then it demoralise the zorro. The nikolai does not visit the lindsey.", "logic": "\nDemoralise(zorro, zerk)\nPamper(zerk, lindsey)\nPamper(nikolai, lindsey)\nUnfeigned(lindsey)\nforall x (Pamper(x, lindsey) -> Gandhian(x))\nforall x (Gandhian(x) -> Demoralise(x, zorro))\n\nnot Pamper(nikolai, lindsey)\n\ntherefore Pamper(nikolai, lindsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The velvet slough the dionne. The dionne fullback the maureen. The berni fullback the maureen. The maureen is bereaved. If something fullback the maureen then it is dreadful. If something is dreadful then it slough the velvet. The dionne is dreadful.", "logic": "\nSlough(velvet, dionne)\nFullback(dionne, maureen)\nFullback(berni, maureen)\nBereaved(maureen)\nforall x (Fullback(x, maureen) -> Dreadful(x))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> Slough(x, velvet))\n\nDreadful(dionne)\n\nFullback(dionne, maureen) and forall x (Fullback(x, maureen) -> Dreadful(x)) -> therefore Dreadful(dionne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The kara delude the lilly. The lilly backslap the sterling. The charil backslap the sterling. The sterling is unripe. If something backslap the sterling then it is witchlike. If something is witchlike then it delude the kara. The lilly is not witchlike.", "logic": "\nDelude(kara, lilly)\nBackslap(lilly, sterling)\nBackslap(charil, sterling)\nUnripe(sterling)\nforall x (Backslap(x, sterling) -> Witchlike(x))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) -> Delude(x, kara))\n\nnot Witchlike(lilly)\n\nBackslap(lilly, sterling) and forall x (Backslap(x, sterling) -> Witchlike(x)) -> therefore Witchlike(lilly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The judd overrule the lynnell. The lynnell spit the madelena. The christina spit the madelena. The madelena is procedural. If something spit the madelena then it is razorback. If something is razorback then it overrule the judd. The lynnell overrule the judd.", "logic": "\nOverrule(judd, lynnell)\nSpit(lynnell, madelena)\nSpit(christina, madelena)\nProcedural(madelena)\nforall x (Spit(x, madelena) -> Razorback(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) -> Overrule(x, judd))\n\nOverrule(lynnell, judd)\n\nSpit(lynnell, madelena) and forall x (Spit(x, madelena) -> Razorback(x)) -> therefore Razorback(lynnell) Razorback(lynnell) and forall x (Razorback(x) -> Overrule(x, judd)) -> therefore Overrule(lynnell, judd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The elsinore sanitize the darwin. The darwin baptise the nanine. The danell baptise the nanine. The nanine is pitiful. If something baptise the nanine then it is disabling. If something is disabling then it sanitize the elsinore. The danell does not like the elsinore.", "logic": "\nSanitize(elsinore, darwin)\nBaptise(darwin, nanine)\nBaptise(danell, nanine)\nPitiful(nanine)\nforall x (Baptise(x, nanine) -> Disabling(x))\nforall x (Disabling(x) -> Sanitize(x, elsinore))\n\nnot Sanitize(danell, elsinore)\n\nBaptise(danell, nanine) and forall x (Baptise(x, nanine) -> Disabling(x)) -> therefore Disabling(danell) Disabling(danell) and forall x (Disabling(x) -> Sanitize(x, elsinore)) -> therefore Sanitize(danell, elsinore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The benjamin vroom the ham. The ham mistrust the barnaby. The darsey mistrust the barnaby. The barnaby is silver. If something mistrust the barnaby then it is gangly. If something is gangly then it vroom the benjamin. The barnaby does not like the benjamin.", "logic": "\nVroom(benjamin, ham)\nMistrust(ham, barnaby)\nMistrust(darsey, barnaby)\nSilver(barnaby)\nforall x (Mistrust(x, barnaby) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Vroom(x, benjamin))\n\nnot Vroom(barnaby, benjamin)\n\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Vroom(x, benjamin)) <- forall x (Mistrust(x, barnaby) -> Gangly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The kimberly imbue the tucker. The tucker sieve the oliy. The leodora sieve the oliy. The oliy is exigent. If something sieve the oliy then it is olympian. If something is olympian then it imbue the kimberly. The kimberly is olympian.", "logic": "\nImbue(kimberly, tucker)\nSieve(tucker, oliy)\nSieve(leodora, oliy)\nExigent(oliy)\nforall x (Sieve(x, oliy) -> Olympian(x))\nforall x (Olympian(x) -> Imbue(x, kimberly))\n\nOlympian(kimberly)\n\nforall x (Sieve(x, oliy) -> Olympian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The jessey hunch the carita. The carita advise the isahella. The leontyne advise the isahella. The isahella is windburned. If something advise the isahella then it is loamy. If something is loamy then it hunch the jessey. The jessey does not like the jessey.", "logic": "\nHunch(jessey, carita)\nAdvise(carita, isahella)\nAdvise(leontyne, isahella)\nWindburned(isahella)\nforall x (Advise(x, isahella) -> Loamy(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Hunch(x, jessey))\n\nnot Hunch(jessey, jessey)\n\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Hunch(x, jessey)) <- forall x (Advise(x, isahella) -> Loamy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The muffin remit the grethel. The grethel kotow the jermain. The mady kotow the jermain. The jermain is nitric. If something kotow the jermain then it is portuguese. If something is portuguese then it remit the muffin. The muffin sees the mady.", "logic": "\nRemit(muffin, grethel)\nKotow(grethel, jermain)\nKotow(mady, jermain)\nNitric(jermain)\nforall x (Kotow(x, jermain) -> Portuguese(x))\nforall x (Portuguese(x) -> Remit(x, muffin))\n\nSees(muffin, mady)\n\nSees(muffin, mady) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The dimitrou powderise the jordain. The jordain misgive the whit. The leonie misgive the whit. The whit is lebanese. If something misgive the whit then it is nearby. If something is nearby then it powderise the dimitrou. The whit is not cold.", "logic": "\nPowderise(dimitrou, jordain)\nMisgive(jordain, whit)\nMisgive(leonie, whit)\nLebanese(whit)\nforall x (Misgive(x, whit) -> Nearby(x))\nforall x (Nearby(x) -> Powderise(x, dimitrou))\n\nnot Cold(whit)\n\nnot Cold(whit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The suzann amount the schuyler. The schuyler cache the olaf. The renelle cache the olaf. The olaf is appealable. If something cache the olaf then it is whiskered. If something is whiskered then it amount the suzann. The schuyler is green.", "logic": "\nAmount(suzann, schuyler)\nCache(schuyler, olaf)\nCache(renelle, olaf)\nAppealable(olaf)\nforall x (Cache(x, olaf) -> Whiskered(x))\nforall x (Whiskered(x) -> Amount(x, suzann))\n\nGreen(schuyler)\n\nGreen(schuyler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1093"} {"premises": "The alberta is ingenuous. The alberta is anosmic. The alberta is galore. If the alberta is ingenuous then the alberta is anosmic. If someone is anosmic and not ingenuous then they are lavish. If the alberta is galore then the alberta is not seismal. If someone is ingenuous then they are galore. If someone is seismal then they are galore. All seismal, ingenuous people are galore. If someone is seismal and not anosmic then they are galore. If the alberta is not seismal then the alberta is lavish. The alberta is galore.", "logic": "\nIngenuous(alberta)\nAnosmic(alberta)\nGalore(alberta)\nIngenuous(alberta) -> Anosmic(alberta)\nforall x (Anosmic(x) and not Ingenuous(x) -> Lavish(x))\nGalore(alberta) -> not Seismal(alberta)\nforall x (Ingenuous(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Seismal(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Seismal(x) and Ingenuous(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Seismal(x) and not Anosmic(x) -> Galore(x))\nnot Seismal(alberta) -> Lavish(alberta)\n\nGalore(alberta)\n\ntherefore Galore(alberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The reina is pawky. The reina is damn. The reina is carmelite. If the reina is pawky then the reina is damn. If someone is damn and not pawky then they are adjective. If the reina is carmelite then the reina is not henpecked. If someone is pawky then they are carmelite. If someone is henpecked then they are carmelite. All henpecked, pawky people are carmelite. If someone is henpecked and not damn then they are carmelite. If the reina is not henpecked then the reina is adjective. The reina is not pawky.", "logic": "\nPawky(reina)\nDamn(reina)\nCarmelite(reina)\nPawky(reina) -> Damn(reina)\nforall x (Damn(x) and not Pawky(x) -> Adjective(x))\nCarmelite(reina) -> not Henpecked(reina)\nforall x (Pawky(x) -> Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) and Pawky(x) -> Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) and not Damn(x) -> Carmelite(x))\nnot Henpecked(reina) -> Adjective(reina)\n\nnot Pawky(reina)\n\ntherefore Pawky(reina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The mendel is debauched. The mendel is repressed. The mendel is dissoluble. If the mendel is debauched then the mendel is repressed. If someone is repressed and not debauched then they are caespitose. If the mendel is dissoluble then the mendel is not maniacal. If someone is debauched then they are dissoluble. If someone is maniacal then they are dissoluble. All maniacal, debauched people are dissoluble. If someone is maniacal and not repressed then they are dissoluble. If the mendel is not maniacal then the mendel is caespitose. The mendel is not maniacal.", "logic": "\nDebauched(mendel)\nRepressed(mendel)\nDissoluble(mendel)\nDebauched(mendel) -> Repressed(mendel)\nforall x (Repressed(x) and not Debauched(x) -> Caespitose(x))\nDissoluble(mendel) -> not Maniacal(mendel)\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) and Debauched(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) and not Repressed(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nnot Maniacal(mendel) -> Caespitose(mendel)\n\nnot Maniacal(mendel)\n\nDissoluble(mendel) and Dissoluble(mendel) -> not Maniacal(mendel) -> therefore not Maniacal(mendel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The kia is salving. The kia is senior. The kia is jobless. If the kia is salving then the kia is senior. If someone is senior and not salving then they are cambrian. If the kia is jobless then the kia is not viewable. If someone is salving then they are jobless. If someone is viewable then they are jobless. All viewable, salving people are jobless. If someone is viewable and not senior then they are jobless. If the kia is not viewable then the kia is cambrian. The kia is viewable.", "logic": "\nSalving(kia)\nSenior(kia)\nJobless(kia)\nSalving(kia) -> Senior(kia)\nforall x (Senior(x) and not Salving(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nJobless(kia) -> not Viewable(kia)\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) and Salving(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) and not Senior(x) -> Jobless(x))\nnot Viewable(kia) -> Cambrian(kia)\n\nViewable(kia)\n\nJobless(kia) and Jobless(kia) -> not Viewable(kia) -> therefore not Viewable(kia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The malorie is sporty. The malorie is stooping. The malorie is seething. If the malorie is sporty then the malorie is stooping. If someone is stooping and not sporty then they are elaborate. If the malorie is seething then the malorie is not prosy. If someone is sporty then they are seething. If someone is prosy then they are seething. All prosy, sporty people are seething. If someone is prosy and not stooping then they are seething. If the malorie is not prosy then the malorie is elaborate. The malorie is elaborate.", "logic": "\nSporty(malorie)\nStooping(malorie)\nSeething(malorie)\nSporty(malorie) -> Stooping(malorie)\nforall x (Stooping(x) and not Sporty(x) -> Elaborate(x))\nSeething(malorie) -> not Prosy(malorie)\nforall x (Sporty(x) -> Seething(x))\nforall x (Prosy(x) -> Seething(x))\nforall x (Prosy(x) and Sporty(x) -> Seething(x))\nforall x (Prosy(x) and not Stooping(x) -> Seething(x))\nnot Prosy(malorie) -> Elaborate(malorie)\n\nElaborate(malorie)\n\nSeething(malorie) and Seething(malorie) -> not Prosy(malorie) -> therefore not Prosy(malorie) not Prosy(malorie) and not Prosy(malorie) -> Elaborate(malorie) -> therefore Elaborate(malorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The cindi is cubital. The cindi is carsick. The cindi is burnished. If the cindi is cubital then the cindi is carsick. If someone is carsick and not cubital then they are boxed. If the cindi is burnished then the cindi is not removable. If someone is cubital then they are burnished. If someone is removable then they are burnished. All removable, cubital people are burnished. If someone is removable and not carsick then they are burnished. If the cindi is not removable then the cindi is boxed. The cindi is not boxed.", "logic": "\nCubital(cindi)\nCarsick(cindi)\nBurnished(cindi)\nCubital(cindi) -> Carsick(cindi)\nforall x (Carsick(x) and not Cubital(x) -> Boxed(x))\nBurnished(cindi) -> not Removable(cindi)\nforall x (Cubital(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) and Cubital(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) and not Carsick(x) -> Burnished(x))\nnot Removable(cindi) -> Boxed(cindi)\n\nnot Boxed(cindi)\n\nBurnished(cindi) and Burnished(cindi) -> not Removable(cindi) -> therefore not Removable(cindi) not Removable(cindi) and not Removable(cindi) -> Boxed(cindi) -> therefore Boxed(cindi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The elianore is untainted. The elianore is bullheaded. The elianore is unfearing. If the elianore is untainted then the elianore is bullheaded. If someone is bullheaded and not untainted then they are ophthalmic. If the elianore is unfearing then the elianore is not rural. If someone is untainted then they are unfearing. If someone is rural then they are unfearing. All rural, untainted people are unfearing. If someone is rural and not bullheaded then they are unfearing. If the elianore is not rural then the elianore is ophthalmic. The elianore does not eat the elianore.", "logic": "\nUntainted(elianore)\nBullheaded(elianore)\nUnfearing(elianore)\nUntainted(elianore) -> Bullheaded(elianore)\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) and not Untainted(x) -> Ophthalmic(x))\nUnfearing(elianore) -> not Rural(elianore)\nforall x (Untainted(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and Untainted(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and not Bullheaded(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nnot Rural(elianore) -> Ophthalmic(elianore)\n\nnot Eats(elianore, elianore)\n\nnot Eats(elianore, elianore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The aimil is peeled. The aimil is definitive. The aimil is ritual. If the aimil is peeled then the aimil is definitive. If someone is definitive and not peeled then they are shoed. If the aimil is ritual then the aimil is not nosocomial. If someone is peeled then they are ritual. If someone is nosocomial then they are ritual. All nosocomial, peeled people are ritual. If someone is nosocomial and not definitive then they are ritual. If the aimil is not nosocomial then the aimil is shoed. The aimil sees the aimil.", "logic": "\nPeeled(aimil)\nDefinitive(aimil)\nRitual(aimil)\nPeeled(aimil) -> Definitive(aimil)\nforall x (Definitive(x) and not Peeled(x) -> Shoed(x))\nRitual(aimil) -> not Nosocomial(aimil)\nforall x (Peeled(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and Peeled(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and not Definitive(x) -> Ritual(x))\nnot Nosocomial(aimil) -> Shoed(aimil)\n\nSees(aimil, aimil)\n\nSees(aimil, aimil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-301"} {"premises": "The anitra institute the sigmund. The mortie enucleate the sigmund. The sigmund is lymphoid. If someone tumefy the mortie then they are ostensive. If someone institute the sigmund and the sigmund tumefy the anitra then they are lymphoid. If someone enucleate the sigmund then they see the mortie. If someone enucleate the mortie then they see the anitra. If the sigmund is adducting then the sigmund institute the mortie. If someone is acaudate and they need the anitra then they need the mortie. The mortie enucleate the sigmund.", "logic": "\nInstitute(anitra, sigmund)\nEnucleate(mortie, sigmund)\nLymphoid(sigmund)\nforall x (Tumefy(x, mortie) -> Ostensive(x))\nforall x (Institute(x, sigmund) and Tumefy(sigmund, anitra) -> Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Enucleate(x, sigmund) -> Enucleate(x, mortie))\nforall x (Enucleate(x, mortie) -> Enucleate(x, anitra))\nAdducting(sigmund) -> Institute(sigmund, mortie)\nforall x (Acaudate(x) and Institute(x, anitra) -> Institute(x, mortie))\n\nEnucleate(mortie, sigmund)\n\ntherefore Enucleate(mortie, sigmund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The winni degas the dorena. The shanon ravel the dorena. The dorena is contralto. If someone thrum the shanon then they are affinal. If someone degas the dorena and the dorena thrum the winni then they are contralto. If someone ravel the dorena then they see the shanon. If someone ravel the shanon then they see the winni. If the dorena is poetical then the dorena degas the shanon. If someone is craved and they need the winni then they need the shanon. The dorena is not contralto.", "logic": "\nDegas(winni, dorena)\nRavel(shanon, dorena)\nContralto(dorena)\nforall x (Thrum(x, shanon) -> Affinal(x))\nforall x (Degas(x, dorena) and Thrum(dorena, winni) -> Contralto(x))\nforall x (Ravel(x, dorena) -> Ravel(x, shanon))\nforall x (Ravel(x, shanon) -> Ravel(x, winni))\nPoetical(dorena) -> Degas(dorena, shanon)\nforall x (Craved(x) and Degas(x, winni) -> Degas(x, shanon))\n\nnot Contralto(dorena)\n\ntherefore Contralto(dorena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The lionello envy the pammi. The arnie manoeuvre the pammi. The pammi is plucky. If someone revet the arnie then they are disarrayed. If someone envy the pammi and the pammi revet the lionello then they are plucky. If someone manoeuvre the pammi then they see the arnie. If someone manoeuvre the arnie then they see the lionello. If the pammi is voluble then the pammi envy the arnie. If someone is autoimmune and they need the lionello then they need the arnie. The arnie manoeuvre the arnie.", "logic": "\nEnvy(lionello, pammi)\nManoeuvre(arnie, pammi)\nPlucky(pammi)\nforall x (Revet(x, arnie) -> Disarrayed(x))\nforall x (Envy(x, pammi) and Revet(pammi, lionello) -> Plucky(x))\nforall x (Manoeuvre(x, pammi) -> Manoeuvre(x, arnie))\nforall x (Manoeuvre(x, arnie) -> Manoeuvre(x, lionello))\nVoluble(pammi) -> Envy(pammi, arnie)\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) and Envy(x, lionello) -> Envy(x, arnie))\n\nManoeuvre(arnie, arnie)\n\nManoeuvre(arnie, pammi) and forall x (Manoeuvre(x, pammi) -> Manoeuvre(x, arnie)) -> therefore Manoeuvre(arnie, arnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The chariot avoid the ingemar. The keslie chasten the ingemar. The ingemar is octangular. If someone coexist the keslie then they are askance. If someone avoid the ingemar and the ingemar coexist the chariot then they are octangular. If someone chasten the ingemar then they see the keslie. If someone chasten the keslie then they see the chariot. If the ingemar is frolicky then the ingemar avoid the keslie. If someone is meningeal and they need the chariot then they need the keslie. The keslie does not see the keslie.", "logic": "\nAvoid(chariot, ingemar)\nChasten(keslie, ingemar)\nOctangular(ingemar)\nforall x (Coexist(x, keslie) -> Askance(x))\nforall x (Avoid(x, ingemar) and Coexist(ingemar, chariot) -> Octangular(x))\nforall x (Chasten(x, ingemar) -> Chasten(x, keslie))\nforall x (Chasten(x, keslie) -> Chasten(x, chariot))\nFrolicky(ingemar) -> Avoid(ingemar, keslie)\nforall x (Meningeal(x) and Avoid(x, chariot) -> Avoid(x, keslie))\n\nnot Chasten(keslie, keslie)\n\nChasten(keslie, ingemar) and forall x (Chasten(x, ingemar) -> Chasten(x, keslie)) -> therefore Chasten(keslie, keslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The verne hoax the cristina. The cristina copy the cristina. The cristina is immediate. If someone syncretise the cristina then they are ameboid. If someone hoax the cristina and the cristina syncretise the verne then they are immediate. If someone copy the cristina then they see the cristina. If someone copy the cristina then they see the verne. If the cristina is toothsome then the cristina hoax the cristina. If someone is minatory and they need the verne then they need the cristina. The cristina copy the verne.", "logic": "\nHoax(verne, cristina)\nCopy(cristina, cristina)\nImmediate(cristina)\nforall x (Syncretise(x, cristina) -> Ameboid(x))\nforall x (Hoax(x, cristina) and Syncretise(cristina, verne) -> Immediate(x))\nforall x (Copy(x, cristina) -> Copy(x, cristina))\nforall x (Copy(x, cristina) -> Copy(x, verne))\nToothsome(cristina) -> Hoax(cristina, cristina)\nforall x (Minatory(x) and Hoax(x, verne) -> Hoax(x, cristina))\n\nCopy(cristina, verne)\n\nCopy(cristina, cristina) and forall x (Copy(x, cristina) -> Copy(x, cristina)) -> therefore Copy(cristina, cristina) Copy(cristina, cristina) and forall x (Copy(x, cristina) -> Copy(x, verne)) -> therefore Copy(cristina, verne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The debora recode the langston. The mirna disgruntle the langston. The langston is apomictic. If someone slash the mirna then they are empyreal. If someone recode the langston and the langston slash the debora then they are apomictic. If someone disgruntle the langston then they see the mirna. If someone disgruntle the mirna then they see the debora. If the langston is sleety then the langston recode the mirna. If someone is gooselike and they need the debora then they need the mirna. The mirna does not see the debora.", "logic": "\nRecode(debora, langston)\nDisgruntle(mirna, langston)\nApomictic(langston)\nforall x (Slash(x, mirna) -> Empyreal(x))\nforall x (Recode(x, langston) and Slash(langston, debora) -> Apomictic(x))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, langston) -> Disgruntle(x, mirna))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, mirna) -> Disgruntle(x, debora))\nSleety(langston) -> Recode(langston, mirna)\nforall x (Gooselike(x) and Recode(x, debora) -> Recode(x, mirna))\n\nnot Disgruntle(mirna, debora)\n\nDisgruntle(mirna, langston) and forall x (Disgruntle(x, langston) -> Disgruntle(x, mirna)) -> therefore Disgruntle(mirna, mirna) Disgruntle(mirna, mirna) and forall x (Disgruntle(x, mirna) -> Disgruntle(x, debora)) -> therefore Disgruntle(mirna, debora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The burt burl the melisent. The marlow scallop the melisent. The melisent is inchoative. If someone demise the marlow then they are tasseled. If someone burl the melisent and the melisent demise the burt then they are inchoative. If someone scallop the melisent then they see the marlow. If someone scallop the marlow then they see the burt. If the melisent is committed then the melisent burl the marlow. If someone is imploring and they need the burt then they need the marlow. The burt does not see the marlow.", "logic": "\nBurl(burt, melisent)\nScallop(marlow, melisent)\nInchoative(melisent)\nforall x (Demise(x, marlow) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Burl(x, melisent) and Demise(melisent, burt) -> Inchoative(x))\nforall x (Scallop(x, melisent) -> Scallop(x, marlow))\nforall x (Scallop(x, marlow) -> Scallop(x, burt))\nCommitted(melisent) -> Burl(melisent, marlow)\nforall x (Imploring(x) and Burl(x, burt) -> Burl(x, marlow))\n\nnot Scallop(burt, marlow)\n\nforall x (Scallop(x, melisent) -> Scallop(x, marlow)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The shandee grok the jess. The phyllida plasticise the jess. The jess is oldish. If someone assign the phyllida then they are zygotic. If someone grok the jess and the jess assign the shandee then they are oldish. If someone plasticise the jess then they see the phyllida. If someone plasticise the phyllida then they see the shandee. If the jess is thousand then the jess grok the phyllida. If someone is tuneful and they need the shandee then they need the phyllida. The shandee grok the phyllida.", "logic": "\nGrok(shandee, jess)\nPlasticise(phyllida, jess)\nOldish(jess)\nforall x (Assign(x, phyllida) -> Zygotic(x))\nforall x (Grok(x, jess) and Assign(jess, shandee) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Plasticise(x, jess) -> Plasticise(x, phyllida))\nforall x (Plasticise(x, phyllida) -> Plasticise(x, shandee))\nThousand(jess) -> Grok(jess, phyllida)\nforall x (Tuneful(x) and Grok(x, shandee) -> Grok(x, phyllida))\n\nGrok(shandee, phyllida)\n\nforall x (Tuneful(x) and Grok(x, shandee) -> Grok(x, phyllida)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The weylin ebonize the tedman. The winnah damp the tedman. The tedman is outclassed. If someone foxhunt the winnah then they are lethal. If someone ebonize the tedman and the tedman foxhunt the weylin then they are outclassed. If someone damp the tedman then they see the winnah. If someone damp the winnah then they see the weylin. If the tedman is nonimmune then the tedman ebonize the winnah. If someone is illusory and they need the weylin then they need the winnah. The tedman does not see the winnah.", "logic": "\nEbonize(weylin, tedman)\nDamp(winnah, tedman)\nOutclassed(tedman)\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, winnah) -> Lethal(x))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, tedman) and Foxhunt(tedman, weylin) -> Outclassed(x))\nforall x (Damp(x, tedman) -> Damp(x, winnah))\nforall x (Damp(x, winnah) -> Damp(x, weylin))\nNonimmune(tedman) -> Ebonize(tedman, winnah)\nforall x (Illusory(x) and Ebonize(x, weylin) -> Ebonize(x, winnah))\n\nnot Damp(tedman, winnah)\n\nforall x (Damp(x, tedman) -> Damp(x, winnah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The jaine word the dayle. The auroora adulterate the dayle. The dayle is travelable. If someone caption the auroora then they are draconian. If someone word the dayle and the dayle caption the jaine then they are travelable. If someone adulterate the dayle then they see the auroora. If someone adulterate the auroora then they see the jaine. If the dayle is lowly then the dayle word the auroora. If someone is begrimed and they need the jaine then they need the auroora. The dayle adulterate the dayle.", "logic": "\nWord(jaine, dayle)\nAdulterate(auroora, dayle)\nTravelable(dayle)\nforall x (Caption(x, auroora) -> Draconian(x))\nforall x (Word(x, dayle) and Caption(dayle, jaine) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, dayle) -> Adulterate(x, auroora))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, auroora) -> Adulterate(x, jaine))\nLowly(dayle) -> Word(dayle, auroora)\nforall x (Begrimed(x) and Word(x, jaine) -> Word(x, auroora))\n\nAdulterate(dayle, dayle)\n\nAdulterate(dayle, dayle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The cyrus watercolor the murdoch. The oralee bestir the murdoch. The murdoch is dangerous. If someone foredate the oralee then they are ameban. If someone watercolor the murdoch and the murdoch foredate the cyrus then they are dangerous. If someone bestir the murdoch then they see the oralee. If someone bestir the oralee then they see the cyrus. If the murdoch is tracheal then the murdoch watercolor the oralee. If someone is centric and they need the cyrus then they need the oralee. The cyrus does not see the murdoch.", "logic": "\nWatercolor(cyrus, murdoch)\nBestir(oralee, murdoch)\nDangerous(murdoch)\nforall x (Foredate(x, oralee) -> Ameban(x))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, murdoch) and Foredate(murdoch, cyrus) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Bestir(x, murdoch) -> Bestir(x, oralee))\nforall x (Bestir(x, oralee) -> Bestir(x, cyrus))\nTracheal(murdoch) -> Watercolor(murdoch, oralee)\nforall x (Centric(x) and Watercolor(x, cyrus) -> Watercolor(x, oralee))\n\nnot Bestir(cyrus, murdoch)\n\nnot Bestir(cyrus, murdoch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The mikael apparel the esteban. The wilbert attract the esteban. The esteban is furtive. If someone propound the wilbert then they are whimsical. If someone apparel the esteban and the esteban propound the mikael then they are furtive. If someone attract the esteban then they see the wilbert. If someone attract the wilbert then they see the mikael. If the esteban is erasable then the esteban apparel the wilbert. If someone is nonchalant and they need the mikael then they need the wilbert. The mikael apparel the mikael.", "logic": "\nApparel(mikael, esteban)\nAttract(wilbert, esteban)\nFurtive(esteban)\nforall x (Propound(x, wilbert) -> Whimsical(x))\nforall x (Apparel(x, esteban) and Propound(esteban, mikael) -> Furtive(x))\nforall x (Attract(x, esteban) -> Attract(x, wilbert))\nforall x (Attract(x, wilbert) -> Attract(x, mikael))\nErasable(esteban) -> Apparel(esteban, wilbert)\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) and Apparel(x, mikael) -> Apparel(x, wilbert))\n\nApparel(mikael, mikael)\n\nApparel(mikael, mikael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1984"} {"premises": "The deeanne is mutilated. The pryce spread the deeanne. The pryce is ascendant. The pryce is mutilated. The goldie spread the deeanne. The goldie spread the pryce. The goldie is biweekly. The goldie is untrusting. The goldie explore the pryce. The goldie explore the melissa. The melissa spread the deeanne. The melissa is ascendant. The melissa is untrusting. The melissa is mutilated. The melissa roach the pryce. The melissa explore the deeanne. If someone explore the melissa then they are biweekly. If someone roach the deeanne and they are packable then they are biweekly. If someone is mutilated then they eat the pryce. If someone is biweekly then they eat the goldie. If someone is biweekly and they see the pryce then they like the pryce. If the goldie roach the pryce then the pryce explore the melissa. If someone roach the melissa then they are untrusting. If someone is untrusting and they eat the melissa then they see the goldie. The goldie spread the pryce.", "logic": "\nMutilated(deeanne)\nSpread(pryce, deeanne)\nAscendant(pryce)\nMutilated(pryce)\nSpread(goldie, deeanne)\nSpread(goldie, pryce)\nBiweekly(goldie)\nUntrusting(goldie)\nExplore(goldie, pryce)\nExplore(goldie, melissa)\nSpread(melissa, deeanne)\nAscendant(melissa)\nUntrusting(melissa)\nMutilated(melissa)\nRoach(melissa, pryce)\nExplore(melissa, deeanne)\nforall x (Explore(x, melissa) -> Biweekly(x))\nforall x (Roach(x, deeanne) and Packable(x) -> Biweekly(x))\nforall x (Mutilated(x) -> Spread(x, pryce))\nforall x (Biweekly(x) -> Spread(x, goldie))\nforall x (Biweekly(x) and Explore(x, pryce) -> Roach(x, pryce))\nRoach(goldie, pryce) -> Explore(pryce, melissa)\nforall x (Roach(x, melissa) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) and Spread(x, melissa) -> Explore(x, goldie))\n\nSpread(goldie, pryce)\n\ntherefore Spread(goldie, pryce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The charlene is barmy. The auroora despatch the charlene. The auroora is zealous. The auroora is barmy. The wake despatch the charlene. The wake despatch the auroora. The wake is brachial. The wake is befitting. The wake manumit the auroora. The wake manumit the stella. The stella despatch the charlene. The stella is zealous. The stella is befitting. The stella is barmy. The stella diabolise the auroora. The stella manumit the charlene. If someone manumit the stella then they are brachial. If someone diabolise the charlene and they are relevant then they are brachial. If someone is barmy then they eat the auroora. If someone is brachial then they eat the wake. If someone is brachial and they see the auroora then they like the auroora. If the wake diabolise the auroora then the auroora manumit the stella. If someone diabolise the stella then they are befitting. If someone is befitting and they eat the stella then they see the wake. The auroora does not eat the charlene.", "logic": "\nBarmy(charlene)\nDespatch(auroora, charlene)\nZealous(auroora)\nBarmy(auroora)\nDespatch(wake, charlene)\nDespatch(wake, auroora)\nBrachial(wake)\nBefitting(wake)\nManumit(wake, auroora)\nManumit(wake, stella)\nDespatch(stella, charlene)\nZealous(stella)\nBefitting(stella)\nBarmy(stella)\nDiabolise(stella, auroora)\nManumit(stella, charlene)\nforall x (Manumit(x, stella) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Diabolise(x, charlene) and Relevant(x) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) -> Despatch(x, auroora))\nforall x (Brachial(x) -> Despatch(x, wake))\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Manumit(x, auroora) -> Diabolise(x, auroora))\nDiabolise(wake, auroora) -> Manumit(auroora, stella)\nforall x (Diabolise(x, stella) -> Befitting(x))\nforall x (Befitting(x) and Despatch(x, stella) -> Manumit(x, wake))\n\nnot Despatch(auroora, charlene)\n\ntherefore Despatch(auroora, charlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The jolyn is tasselled. The filide perm the jolyn. The filide is unobliging. The filide is tasselled. The jinny perm the jolyn. The jinny perm the filide. The jinny is sublimate. The jinny is bifacial. The jinny crate the filide. The jinny crate the stewart. The stewart perm the jolyn. The stewart is unobliging. The stewart is bifacial. The stewart is tasselled. The stewart stalinize the filide. The stewart crate the jolyn. If someone crate the stewart then they are sublimate. If someone stalinize the jolyn and they are uninviting then they are sublimate. If someone is tasselled then they eat the filide. If someone is sublimate then they eat the jinny. If someone is sublimate and they see the filide then they like the filide. If the jinny stalinize the filide then the filide crate the stewart. If someone stalinize the stewart then they are bifacial. If someone is bifacial and they eat the stewart then they see the jinny. The jolyn perm the filide.", "logic": "\nTasselled(jolyn)\nPerm(filide, jolyn)\nUnobliging(filide)\nTasselled(filide)\nPerm(jinny, jolyn)\nPerm(jinny, filide)\nSublimate(jinny)\nBifacial(jinny)\nCrate(jinny, filide)\nCrate(jinny, stewart)\nPerm(stewart, jolyn)\nUnobliging(stewart)\nBifacial(stewart)\nTasselled(stewart)\nStalinize(stewart, filide)\nCrate(stewart, jolyn)\nforall x (Crate(x, stewart) -> Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Stalinize(x, jolyn) and Uninviting(x) -> Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Tasselled(x) -> Perm(x, filide))\nforall x (Sublimate(x) -> Perm(x, jinny))\nforall x (Sublimate(x) and Crate(x, filide) -> Stalinize(x, filide))\nStalinize(jinny, filide) -> Crate(filide, stewart)\nforall x (Stalinize(x, stewart) -> Bifacial(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Perm(x, stewart) -> Crate(x, jinny))\n\nPerm(jolyn, filide)\n\nTasselled(jolyn) and forall x (Tasselled(x) -> Perm(x, filide)) -> therefore Perm(jolyn, filide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The hettie is natal. The harlan jeer the hettie. The harlan is unsuitable. The harlan is natal. The thorvald jeer the hettie. The thorvald jeer the harlan. The thorvald is rueful. The thorvald is furthest. The thorvald supervene the harlan. The thorvald supervene the wash. The wash jeer the hettie. The wash is unsuitable. The wash is furthest. The wash is natal. The wash westernise the harlan. The wash supervene the hettie. If someone supervene the wash then they are rueful. If someone westernise the hettie and they are tenfold then they are rueful. If someone is natal then they eat the harlan. If someone is rueful then they eat the thorvald. If someone is rueful and they see the harlan then they like the harlan. If the thorvald westernise the harlan then the harlan supervene the wash. If someone westernise the wash then they are furthest. If someone is furthest and they eat the wash then they see the thorvald. The harlan does not eat the harlan.", "logic": "\nNatal(hettie)\nJeer(harlan, hettie)\nUnsuitable(harlan)\nNatal(harlan)\nJeer(thorvald, hettie)\nJeer(thorvald, harlan)\nRueful(thorvald)\nFurthest(thorvald)\nSupervene(thorvald, harlan)\nSupervene(thorvald, wash)\nJeer(wash, hettie)\nUnsuitable(wash)\nFurthest(wash)\nNatal(wash)\nWesternise(wash, harlan)\nSupervene(wash, hettie)\nforall x (Supervene(x, wash) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Westernise(x, hettie) and Tenfold(x) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Jeer(x, harlan))\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Jeer(x, thorvald))\nforall x (Rueful(x) and Supervene(x, harlan) -> Westernise(x, harlan))\nWesternise(thorvald, harlan) -> Supervene(harlan, wash)\nforall x (Westernise(x, wash) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and Jeer(x, wash) -> Supervene(x, thorvald))\n\nnot Jeer(harlan, harlan)\n\nNatal(harlan) and forall x (Natal(x) -> Jeer(x, harlan)) -> therefore Jeer(harlan, harlan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The beatrice is trilled. The hudson wawl the beatrice. The hudson is revolved. The hudson is trilled. The giorgio wawl the beatrice. The giorgio wawl the hudson. The giorgio is jejune. The giorgio is unlogical. The giorgio stretch the hudson. The giorgio stretch the lay. The lay wawl the beatrice. The lay is revolved. The lay is unlogical. The lay is trilled. The lay copyedit the hudson. The lay stretch the beatrice. If someone stretch the lay then they are jejune. If someone copyedit the beatrice and they are insipid then they are jejune. If someone is trilled then they eat the hudson. If someone is jejune then they eat the giorgio. If someone is jejune and they see the hudson then they like the hudson. If the giorgio copyedit the hudson then the hudson stretch the lay. If someone copyedit the lay then they are unlogical. If someone is unlogical and they eat the lay then they see the giorgio. The hudson stretch the lay.", "logic": "\nTrilled(beatrice)\nWawl(hudson, beatrice)\nRevolved(hudson)\nTrilled(hudson)\nWawl(giorgio, beatrice)\nWawl(giorgio, hudson)\nJejune(giorgio)\nUnlogical(giorgio)\nStretch(giorgio, hudson)\nStretch(giorgio, lay)\nWawl(lay, beatrice)\nRevolved(lay)\nUnlogical(lay)\nTrilled(lay)\nCopyedit(lay, hudson)\nStretch(lay, beatrice)\nforall x (Stretch(x, lay) -> Jejune(x))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, beatrice) and Insipid(x) -> Jejune(x))\nforall x (Trilled(x) -> Wawl(x, hudson))\nforall x (Jejune(x) -> Wawl(x, giorgio))\nforall x (Jejune(x) and Stretch(x, hudson) -> Copyedit(x, hudson))\nCopyedit(giorgio, hudson) -> Stretch(hudson, lay)\nforall x (Copyedit(x, lay) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) and Wawl(x, lay) -> Stretch(x, giorgio))\n\nStretch(hudson, lay)\n\nJejune(giorgio) and Stretch(giorgio, hudson) and forall x (Jejune(x) and Stretch(x, hudson) -> Copyedit(x, hudson)) -> therefore Copyedit(giorgio, hudson) Copyedit(giorgio, hudson) and Copyedit(giorgio, hudson) -> Stretch(hudson, lay) -> therefore Stretch(hudson, lay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The blanche is languid. The minta forest the blanche. The minta is unheeding. The minta is languid. The roxy forest the blanche. The roxy forest the minta. The roxy is unexploded. The roxy is melanesian. The roxy harry the minta. The roxy harry the gonzalo. The gonzalo forest the blanche. The gonzalo is unheeding. The gonzalo is melanesian. The gonzalo is languid. The gonzalo empurple the minta. The gonzalo harry the blanche. If someone harry the gonzalo then they are unexploded. If someone empurple the blanche and they are liberian then they are unexploded. If someone is languid then they eat the minta. If someone is unexploded then they eat the roxy. If someone is unexploded and they see the minta then they like the minta. If the roxy empurple the minta then the minta harry the gonzalo. If someone empurple the gonzalo then they are melanesian. If someone is melanesian and they eat the gonzalo then they see the roxy. The minta does not see the gonzalo.", "logic": "\nLanguid(blanche)\nForest(minta, blanche)\nUnheeding(minta)\nLanguid(minta)\nForest(roxy, blanche)\nForest(roxy, minta)\nUnexploded(roxy)\nMelanesian(roxy)\nHarry(roxy, minta)\nHarry(roxy, gonzalo)\nForest(gonzalo, blanche)\nUnheeding(gonzalo)\nMelanesian(gonzalo)\nLanguid(gonzalo)\nEmpurple(gonzalo, minta)\nHarry(gonzalo, blanche)\nforall x (Harry(x, gonzalo) -> Unexploded(x))\nforall x (Empurple(x, blanche) and Liberian(x) -> Unexploded(x))\nforall x (Languid(x) -> Forest(x, minta))\nforall x (Unexploded(x) -> Forest(x, roxy))\nforall x (Unexploded(x) and Harry(x, minta) -> Empurple(x, minta))\nEmpurple(roxy, minta) -> Harry(minta, gonzalo)\nforall x (Empurple(x, gonzalo) -> Melanesian(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) and Forest(x, gonzalo) -> Harry(x, roxy))\n\nnot Harry(minta, gonzalo)\n\nUnexploded(roxy) and Harry(roxy, minta) and forall x (Unexploded(x) and Harry(x, minta) -> Empurple(x, minta)) -> therefore Empurple(roxy, minta) Empurple(roxy, minta) and Empurple(roxy, minta) -> Harry(minta, gonzalo) -> therefore Harry(minta, gonzalo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The trip is unequal. The sofie bootstrap the trip. The sofie is couchant. The sofie is unequal. The garrot bootstrap the trip. The garrot bootstrap the sofie. The garrot is vasiform. The garrot is political. The garrot cannulize the sofie. The garrot cannulize the avraham. The avraham bootstrap the trip. The avraham is couchant. The avraham is political. The avraham is unequal. The avraham mash the sofie. The avraham cannulize the trip. If someone cannulize the avraham then they are vasiform. If someone mash the trip and they are biaxial then they are vasiform. If someone is unequal then they eat the sofie. If someone is vasiform then they eat the garrot. If someone is vasiform and they see the sofie then they like the sofie. If the garrot mash the sofie then the sofie cannulize the avraham. If someone mash the avraham then they are political. If someone is political and they eat the avraham then they see the garrot. The sofie is not political.", "logic": "\nUnequal(trip)\nBootstrap(sofie, trip)\nCouchant(sofie)\nUnequal(sofie)\nBootstrap(garrot, trip)\nBootstrap(garrot, sofie)\nVasiform(garrot)\nPolitical(garrot)\nCannulize(garrot, sofie)\nCannulize(garrot, avraham)\nBootstrap(avraham, trip)\nCouchant(avraham)\nPolitical(avraham)\nUnequal(avraham)\nMash(avraham, sofie)\nCannulize(avraham, trip)\nforall x (Cannulize(x, avraham) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Mash(x, trip) and Biaxial(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Bootstrap(x, sofie))\nforall x (Vasiform(x) -> Bootstrap(x, garrot))\nforall x (Vasiform(x) and Cannulize(x, sofie) -> Mash(x, sofie))\nMash(garrot, sofie) -> Cannulize(sofie, avraham)\nforall x (Mash(x, avraham) -> Political(x))\nforall x (Political(x) and Bootstrap(x, avraham) -> Cannulize(x, garrot))\n\nnot Political(sofie)\n\nforall x (Mash(x, avraham) -> Political(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The joey is spirant. The charmaine disinfest the joey. The charmaine is numerate. The charmaine is spirant. The ellsworth disinfest the joey. The ellsworth disinfest the charmaine. The ellsworth is reversed. The ellsworth is benthal. The ellsworth undersell the charmaine. The ellsworth undersell the minna. The minna disinfest the joey. The minna is numerate. The minna is benthal. The minna is spirant. The minna niggle the charmaine. The minna undersell the joey. If someone undersell the minna then they are reversed. If someone niggle the joey and they are dictated then they are reversed. If someone is spirant then they eat the charmaine. If someone is reversed then they eat the ellsworth. If someone is reversed and they see the charmaine then they like the charmaine. If the ellsworth niggle the charmaine then the charmaine undersell the minna. If someone niggle the minna then they are benthal. If someone is benthal and they eat the minna then they see the ellsworth. The joey disinfest the ellsworth.", "logic": "\nSpirant(joey)\nDisinfest(charmaine, joey)\nNumerate(charmaine)\nSpirant(charmaine)\nDisinfest(ellsworth, joey)\nDisinfest(ellsworth, charmaine)\nReversed(ellsworth)\nBenthal(ellsworth)\nUndersell(ellsworth, charmaine)\nUndersell(ellsworth, minna)\nDisinfest(minna, joey)\nNumerate(minna)\nBenthal(minna)\nSpirant(minna)\nNiggle(minna, charmaine)\nUndersell(minna, joey)\nforall x (Undersell(x, minna) -> Reversed(x))\nforall x (Niggle(x, joey) and Dictated(x) -> Reversed(x))\nforall x (Spirant(x) -> Disinfest(x, charmaine))\nforall x (Reversed(x) -> Disinfest(x, ellsworth))\nforall x (Reversed(x) and Undersell(x, charmaine) -> Niggle(x, charmaine))\nNiggle(ellsworth, charmaine) -> Undersell(charmaine, minna)\nforall x (Niggle(x, minna) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Benthal(x) and Disinfest(x, minna) -> Undersell(x, ellsworth))\n\nDisinfest(joey, ellsworth)\n\nforall x (Reversed(x) -> Disinfest(x, ellsworth)) <- forall x (Undersell(x, minna) -> Reversed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The hedy is geared. The sayre remedy the hedy. The sayre is scrubbed. The sayre is geared. The amie remedy the hedy. The amie remedy the sayre. The amie is sodding. The amie is calibrated. The amie concur the sayre. The amie concur the beverie. The beverie remedy the hedy. The beverie is scrubbed. The beverie is calibrated. The beverie is geared. The beverie condemn the sayre. The beverie concur the hedy. If someone concur the beverie then they are sodding. If someone condemn the hedy and they are eulogistic then they are sodding. If someone is geared then they eat the sayre. If someone is sodding then they eat the amie. If someone is sodding and they see the sayre then they like the sayre. If the amie condemn the sayre then the sayre concur the beverie. If someone condemn the beverie then they are calibrated. If someone is calibrated and they eat the beverie then they see the amie. The hedy does not like the sayre.", "logic": "\nGeared(hedy)\nRemedy(sayre, hedy)\nScrubbed(sayre)\nGeared(sayre)\nRemedy(amie, hedy)\nRemedy(amie, sayre)\nSodding(amie)\nCalibrated(amie)\nConcur(amie, sayre)\nConcur(amie, beverie)\nRemedy(beverie, hedy)\nScrubbed(beverie)\nCalibrated(beverie)\nGeared(beverie)\nCondemn(beverie, sayre)\nConcur(beverie, hedy)\nforall x (Concur(x, beverie) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Condemn(x, hedy) and Eulogistic(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Remedy(x, sayre))\nforall x (Sodding(x) -> Remedy(x, amie))\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Concur(x, sayre) -> Condemn(x, sayre))\nCondemn(amie, sayre) -> Concur(sayre, beverie)\nforall x (Condemn(x, beverie) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Calibrated(x) and Remedy(x, beverie) -> Concur(x, amie))\n\nnot Condemn(hedy, sayre)\n\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Concur(x, sayre) -> Condemn(x, sayre)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The leena is unroofed. The donal heave the leena. The donal is size. The donal is unroofed. The rabbi heave the leena. The rabbi heave the donal. The rabbi is generic. The rabbi is sunless. The rabbi warm the donal. The rabbi warm the jeanette. The jeanette heave the leena. The jeanette is size. The jeanette is sunless. The jeanette is unroofed. The jeanette defrock the donal. The jeanette warm the leena. If someone warm the jeanette then they are generic. If someone defrock the leena and they are elfish then they are generic. If someone is unroofed then they eat the donal. If someone is generic then they eat the rabbi. If someone is generic and they see the donal then they like the donal. If the rabbi defrock the donal then the donal warm the jeanette. If someone defrock the jeanette then they are sunless. If someone is sunless and they eat the jeanette then they see the rabbi. The donal is elfish.", "logic": "\nUnroofed(leena)\nHeave(donal, leena)\nSize(donal)\nUnroofed(donal)\nHeave(rabbi, leena)\nHeave(rabbi, donal)\nGeneric(rabbi)\nSunless(rabbi)\nWarm(rabbi, donal)\nWarm(rabbi, jeanette)\nHeave(jeanette, leena)\nSize(jeanette)\nSunless(jeanette)\nUnroofed(jeanette)\nDefrock(jeanette, donal)\nWarm(jeanette, leena)\nforall x (Warm(x, jeanette) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Defrock(x, leena) and Elfish(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Heave(x, donal))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Heave(x, rabbi))\nforall x (Generic(x) and Warm(x, donal) -> Defrock(x, donal))\nDefrock(rabbi, donal) -> Warm(donal, jeanette)\nforall x (Defrock(x, jeanette) -> Sunless(x))\nforall x (Sunless(x) and Heave(x, jeanette) -> Warm(x, rabbi))\n\nElfish(donal)\n\nElfish(donal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The fidel is beetle. The carlina candy the fidel. The carlina is mangy. The carlina is beetle. The garrett candy the fidel. The garrett candy the carlina. The garrett is straplike. The garrett is stagy. The garrett deepen the carlina. The garrett deepen the minnie. The minnie candy the fidel. The minnie is mangy. The minnie is stagy. The minnie is beetle. The minnie lyophilise the carlina. The minnie deepen the fidel. If someone deepen the minnie then they are straplike. If someone lyophilise the fidel and they are amidship then they are straplike. If someone is beetle then they eat the carlina. If someone is straplike then they eat the garrett. If someone is straplike and they see the carlina then they like the carlina. If the garrett lyophilise the carlina then the carlina deepen the minnie. If someone lyophilise the minnie then they are stagy. If someone is stagy and they eat the minnie then they see the garrett. The carlina does not see the carlina.", "logic": "\nBeetle(fidel)\nCandy(carlina, fidel)\nMangy(carlina)\nBeetle(carlina)\nCandy(garrett, fidel)\nCandy(garrett, carlina)\nStraplike(garrett)\nStagy(garrett)\nDeepen(garrett, carlina)\nDeepen(garrett, minnie)\nCandy(minnie, fidel)\nMangy(minnie)\nStagy(minnie)\nBeetle(minnie)\nLyophilise(minnie, carlina)\nDeepen(minnie, fidel)\nforall x (Deepen(x, minnie) -> Straplike(x))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, fidel) and Amidship(x) -> Straplike(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Candy(x, carlina))\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> Candy(x, garrett))\nforall x (Straplike(x) and Deepen(x, carlina) -> Lyophilise(x, carlina))\nLyophilise(garrett, carlina) -> Deepen(carlina, minnie)\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, minnie) -> Stagy(x))\nforall x (Stagy(x) and Candy(x, minnie) -> Deepen(x, garrett))\n\nnot Deepen(carlina, carlina)\n\nnot Deepen(carlina, carlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The mabelle is embossed. The rochell prick the mabelle. The rochell is lacteal. The rochell is embossed. The edmund prick the mabelle. The edmund prick the rochell. The edmund is convolute. The edmund is employable. The edmund submit the rochell. The edmund submit the lise. The lise prick the mabelle. The lise is lacteal. The lise is employable. The lise is embossed. The lise froth the rochell. The lise submit the mabelle. If someone submit the lise then they are convolute. If someone froth the mabelle and they are lucky then they are convolute. If someone is embossed then they eat the rochell. If someone is convolute then they eat the edmund. If someone is convolute and they see the rochell then they like the rochell. If the edmund froth the rochell then the rochell submit the lise. If someone froth the lise then they are employable. If someone is employable and they eat the lise then they see the edmund. The lise submit the lise.", "logic": "\nEmbossed(mabelle)\nPrick(rochell, mabelle)\nLacteal(rochell)\nEmbossed(rochell)\nPrick(edmund, mabelle)\nPrick(edmund, rochell)\nConvolute(edmund)\nEmployable(edmund)\nSubmit(edmund, rochell)\nSubmit(edmund, lise)\nPrick(lise, mabelle)\nLacteal(lise)\nEmployable(lise)\nEmbossed(lise)\nFroth(lise, rochell)\nSubmit(lise, mabelle)\nforall x (Submit(x, lise) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Froth(x, mabelle) and Lucky(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Prick(x, rochell))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Prick(x, edmund))\nforall x (Convolute(x) and Submit(x, rochell) -> Froth(x, rochell))\nFroth(edmund, rochell) -> Submit(rochell, lise)\nforall x (Froth(x, lise) -> Employable(x))\nforall x (Employable(x) and Prick(x, lise) -> Submit(x, edmund))\n\nSubmit(lise, lise)\n\nSubmit(lise, lise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-249"} {"premises": "The neddy is guardant. The neddy plonk the ros. The sumner is guardant. The sumner replicate the ros. The gene replicate the sumner. The gene plonk the sumner. The ros plonk the gene. If someone is guardant and they do not chase the ros then they see the ros. If someone is guardant and they see the sumner then they do not see the gene. If someone plonk the sumner then they are guardant. If someone plonk the gene and they do not need the gene then they are maniacal. If someone replicate the sumner then they chase the neddy. If someone replicate the gene and they are not guardant then they do not need the neddy. The gene replicate the sumner.", "logic": "\nGuardant(neddy)\nPlonk(neddy, ros)\nGuardant(sumner)\nReplicate(sumner, ros)\nReplicate(gene, sumner)\nPlonk(gene, sumner)\nPlonk(ros, gene)\nforall x (Guardant(x) and not Protrude(x, ros) -> Plonk(x, ros))\nforall x (Guardant(x) and Plonk(x, sumner) -> not Plonk(x, gene))\nforall x (Plonk(x, sumner) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Plonk(x, gene) and not Replicate(x, gene) -> Maniacal(x))\nforall x (Replicate(x, sumner) -> Protrude(x, neddy))\nforall x (Replicate(x, gene) and not Guardant(x) -> not Replicate(x, neddy))\n\nReplicate(gene, sumner)\n\ntherefore Replicate(gene, sumner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The averyl is clitoral. The averyl bless the artie. The tina is clitoral. The tina overthrow the artie. The emmy overthrow the tina. The emmy bless the tina. The artie bless the emmy. If someone is clitoral and they do not chase the artie then they see the artie. If someone is clitoral and they see the tina then they do not see the emmy. If someone bless the tina then they are clitoral. If someone bless the emmy and they do not need the emmy then they are reigning. If someone overthrow the tina then they chase the averyl. If someone overthrow the emmy and they are not clitoral then they do not need the averyl. The tina is not clitoral.", "logic": "\nClitoral(averyl)\nBless(averyl, artie)\nClitoral(tina)\nOverthrow(tina, artie)\nOverthrow(emmy, tina)\nBless(emmy, tina)\nBless(artie, emmy)\nforall x (Clitoral(x) and not Chant(x, artie) -> Bless(x, artie))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) and Bless(x, tina) -> not Bless(x, emmy))\nforall x (Bless(x, tina) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Bless(x, emmy) and not Overthrow(x, emmy) -> Reigning(x))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, tina) -> Chant(x, averyl))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, emmy) and not Clitoral(x) -> not Overthrow(x, averyl))\n\nnot Clitoral(tina)\n\ntherefore Clitoral(tina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The allin is bladdery. The allin flounder the mercedes. The daffie is bladdery. The daffie possess the mercedes. The corissa possess the daffie. The corissa flounder the daffie. The mercedes flounder the corissa. If someone is bladdery and they do not chase the mercedes then they see the mercedes. If someone is bladdery and they see the daffie then they do not see the corissa. If someone flounder the daffie then they are bladdery. If someone flounder the corissa and they do not need the corissa then they are lasting. If someone possess the daffie then they chase the allin. If someone possess the corissa and they are not bladdery then they do not need the allin. The corissa is bladdery.", "logic": "\nBladdery(allin)\nFlounder(allin, mercedes)\nBladdery(daffie)\nPossess(daffie, mercedes)\nPossess(corissa, daffie)\nFlounder(corissa, daffie)\nFlounder(mercedes, corissa)\nforall x (Bladdery(x) and not Nitpick(x, mercedes) -> Flounder(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Bladdery(x) and Flounder(x, daffie) -> not Flounder(x, corissa))\nforall x (Flounder(x, daffie) -> Bladdery(x))\nforall x (Flounder(x, corissa) and not Possess(x, corissa) -> Lasting(x))\nforall x (Possess(x, daffie) -> Nitpick(x, allin))\nforall x (Possess(x, corissa) and not Bladdery(x) -> not Possess(x, allin))\n\nBladdery(corissa)\n\nFlounder(corissa, daffie) and forall x (Flounder(x, daffie) -> Bladdery(x)) -> therefore Bladdery(corissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The christan is openhanded. The christan stroke the robert. The lani is openhanded. The lani sauce the robert. The edgardo sauce the lani. The edgardo stroke the lani. The robert stroke the edgardo. If someone is openhanded and they do not chase the robert then they see the robert. If someone is openhanded and they see the lani then they do not see the edgardo. If someone stroke the lani then they are openhanded. If someone stroke the edgardo and they do not need the edgardo then they are oldline. If someone sauce the lani then they chase the christan. If someone sauce the edgardo and they are not openhanded then they do not need the christan. The edgardo is not openhanded.", "logic": "\nOpenhanded(christan)\nStroke(christan, robert)\nOpenhanded(lani)\nSauce(lani, robert)\nSauce(edgardo, lani)\nStroke(edgardo, lani)\nStroke(robert, edgardo)\nforall x (Openhanded(x) and not Prick(x, robert) -> Stroke(x, robert))\nforall x (Openhanded(x) and Stroke(x, lani) -> not Stroke(x, edgardo))\nforall x (Stroke(x, lani) -> Openhanded(x))\nforall x (Stroke(x, edgardo) and not Sauce(x, edgardo) -> Oldline(x))\nforall x (Sauce(x, lani) -> Prick(x, christan))\nforall x (Sauce(x, edgardo) and not Openhanded(x) -> not Sauce(x, christan))\n\nnot Openhanded(edgardo)\n\nStroke(edgardo, lani) and forall x (Stroke(x, lani) -> Openhanded(x)) -> therefore Openhanded(edgardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The gian is grooved. The gian render the chrystal. The naomi is grooved. The naomi intonate the chrystal. The goddart intonate the naomi. The goddart render the naomi. The chrystal render the goddart. If someone is grooved and they do not chase the chrystal then they see the chrystal. If someone is grooved and they see the naomi then they do not see the goddart. If someone render the naomi then they are grooved. If someone render the goddart and they do not need the goddart then they are pyrectic. If someone intonate the naomi then they chase the gian. If someone intonate the goddart and they are not grooved then they do not need the gian. The goddart does not see the goddart.", "logic": "\nGrooved(gian)\nRender(gian, chrystal)\nGrooved(naomi)\nIntonate(naomi, chrystal)\nIntonate(goddart, naomi)\nRender(goddart, naomi)\nRender(chrystal, goddart)\nforall x (Grooved(x) and not Fascinate(x, chrystal) -> Render(x, chrystal))\nforall x (Grooved(x) and Render(x, naomi) -> not Render(x, goddart))\nforall x (Render(x, naomi) -> Grooved(x))\nforall x (Render(x, goddart) and not Intonate(x, goddart) -> Pyrectic(x))\nforall x (Intonate(x, naomi) -> Fascinate(x, gian))\nforall x (Intonate(x, goddart) and not Grooved(x) -> not Intonate(x, gian))\n\nnot Render(goddart, goddart)\n\nRender(goddart, naomi) and forall x (Render(x, naomi) -> Grooved(x)) -> therefore Grooved(goddart) Grooved(goddart) and Render(goddart, naomi) and forall x (Grooved(x) and Render(x, naomi) -> not Render(x, goddart)) -> therefore not Render(goddart, goddart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The sabina is monotypic. The sabina uncork the dasya. The juline is monotypic. The juline outflank the dasya. The adrien outflank the juline. The adrien uncork the juline. The dasya uncork the adrien. If someone is monotypic and they do not chase the dasya then they see the dasya. If someone is monotypic and they see the juline then they do not see the adrien. If someone uncork the juline then they are monotypic. If someone uncork the adrien and they do not need the adrien then they are homologic. If someone outflank the juline then they chase the sabina. If someone outflank the adrien and they are not monotypic then they do not need the sabina. The adrien uncork the adrien.", "logic": "\nMonotypic(sabina)\nUncork(sabina, dasya)\nMonotypic(juline)\nOutflank(juline, dasya)\nOutflank(adrien, juline)\nUncork(adrien, juline)\nUncork(dasya, adrien)\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and not Imprint(x, dasya) -> Uncork(x, dasya))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and Uncork(x, juline) -> not Uncork(x, adrien))\nforall x (Uncork(x, juline) -> Monotypic(x))\nforall x (Uncork(x, adrien) and not Outflank(x, adrien) -> Homologic(x))\nforall x (Outflank(x, juline) -> Imprint(x, sabina))\nforall x (Outflank(x, adrien) and not Monotypic(x) -> not Outflank(x, sabina))\n\nUncork(adrien, adrien)\n\nUncork(adrien, juline) and forall x (Uncork(x, juline) -> Monotypic(x)) -> therefore Monotypic(adrien) Monotypic(adrien) and Uncork(adrien, juline) and forall x (Monotypic(x) and Uncork(x, juline) -> not Uncork(x, adrien)) -> therefore not Uncork(adrien, adrien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The beatriz is bondable. The beatriz overlook the joanna. The tyler is bondable. The tyler race the joanna. The vassily race the tyler. The vassily overlook the tyler. The joanna overlook the vassily. If someone is bondable and they do not chase the joanna then they see the joanna. If someone is bondable and they see the tyler then they do not see the vassily. If someone overlook the tyler then they are bondable. If someone overlook the vassily and they do not need the vassily then they are portentous. If someone race the tyler then they chase the beatriz. If someone race the vassily and they are not bondable then they do not need the beatriz. The joanna does not see the joanna.", "logic": "\nBondable(beatriz)\nOverlook(beatriz, joanna)\nBondable(tyler)\nRace(tyler, joanna)\nRace(vassily, tyler)\nOverlook(vassily, tyler)\nOverlook(joanna, vassily)\nforall x (Bondable(x) and not Browbeat(x, joanna) -> Overlook(x, joanna))\nforall x (Bondable(x) and Overlook(x, tyler) -> not Overlook(x, vassily))\nforall x (Overlook(x, tyler) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Overlook(x, vassily) and not Race(x, vassily) -> Portentous(x))\nforall x (Race(x, tyler) -> Browbeat(x, beatriz))\nforall x (Race(x, vassily) and not Bondable(x) -> not Race(x, beatriz))\n\nnot Overlook(joanna, joanna)\n\nforall x (Bondable(x) and not Browbeat(x, joanna) -> Overlook(x, joanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The dacy is maggoty. The dacy peril the chelsy. The meagan is maggoty. The meagan metallize the chelsy. The konrad metallize the meagan. The konrad peril the meagan. The chelsy peril the konrad. If someone is maggoty and they do not chase the chelsy then they see the chelsy. If someone is maggoty and they see the meagan then they do not see the konrad. If someone peril the meagan then they are maggoty. If someone peril the konrad and they do not need the konrad then they are airy. If someone metallize the meagan then they chase the dacy. If someone metallize the konrad and they are not maggoty then they do not need the dacy. The meagan peril the chelsy.", "logic": "\nMaggoty(dacy)\nPeril(dacy, chelsy)\nMaggoty(meagan)\nMetallize(meagan, chelsy)\nMetallize(konrad, meagan)\nPeril(konrad, meagan)\nPeril(chelsy, konrad)\nforall x (Maggoty(x) and not Reboot(x, chelsy) -> Peril(x, chelsy))\nforall x (Maggoty(x) and Peril(x, meagan) -> not Peril(x, konrad))\nforall x (Peril(x, meagan) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Peril(x, konrad) and not Metallize(x, konrad) -> Airy(x))\nforall x (Metallize(x, meagan) -> Reboot(x, dacy))\nforall x (Metallize(x, konrad) and not Maggoty(x) -> not Metallize(x, dacy))\n\nPeril(meagan, chelsy)\n\nforall x (Maggoty(x) and not Reboot(x, chelsy) -> Peril(x, chelsy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The etty is inhibited. The etty retch the roxana. The ansel is inhibited. The ansel homer the roxana. The hiro homer the ansel. The hiro retch the ansel. The roxana retch the hiro. If someone is inhibited and they do not chase the roxana then they see the roxana. If someone is inhibited and they see the ansel then they do not see the hiro. If someone retch the ansel then they are inhibited. If someone retch the hiro and they do not need the hiro then they are earthy. If someone homer the ansel then they chase the etty. If someone homer the hiro and they are not inhibited then they do not need the etty. The ansel is not earthy.", "logic": "\nInhibited(etty)\nRetch(etty, roxana)\nInhibited(ansel)\nHomer(ansel, roxana)\nHomer(hiro, ansel)\nRetch(hiro, ansel)\nRetch(roxana, hiro)\nforall x (Inhibited(x) and not Subpoena(x, roxana) -> Retch(x, roxana))\nforall x (Inhibited(x) and Retch(x, ansel) -> not Retch(x, hiro))\nforall x (Retch(x, ansel) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Retch(x, hiro) and not Homer(x, hiro) -> Earthy(x))\nforall x (Homer(x, ansel) -> Subpoena(x, etty))\nforall x (Homer(x, hiro) and not Inhibited(x) -> not Homer(x, etty))\n\nnot Earthy(ansel)\n\nforall x (Retch(x, hiro) and not Homer(x, hiro) -> Earthy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The pepe is unhuman. The pepe litter the forest. The benni is unhuman. The benni ease the forest. The homer ease the benni. The homer litter the benni. The forest litter the homer. If someone is unhuman and they do not chase the forest then they see the forest. If someone is unhuman and they see the benni then they do not see the homer. If someone litter the benni then they are unhuman. If someone litter the homer and they do not need the homer then they are emergent. If someone ease the benni then they chase the pepe. If someone ease the homer and they are not unhuman then they do not need the pepe. The pepe litter the benni.", "logic": "\nUnhuman(pepe)\nLitter(pepe, forest)\nUnhuman(benni)\nEase(benni, forest)\nEase(homer, benni)\nLitter(homer, benni)\nLitter(forest, homer)\nforall x (Unhuman(x) and not Ionate(x, forest) -> Litter(x, forest))\nforall x (Unhuman(x) and Litter(x, benni) -> not Litter(x, homer))\nforall x (Litter(x, benni) -> Unhuman(x))\nforall x (Litter(x, homer) and not Ease(x, homer) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Ease(x, benni) -> Ionate(x, pepe))\nforall x (Ease(x, homer) and not Unhuman(x) -> not Ease(x, pepe))\n\nLitter(pepe, benni)\n\nLitter(pepe, benni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The aida is canescent. The aida prefix the janey. The verene is canescent. The verene comminute the janey. The starlin comminute the verene. The starlin prefix the verene. The janey prefix the starlin. If someone is canescent and they do not chase the janey then they see the janey. If someone is canescent and they see the verene then they do not see the starlin. If someone prefix the verene then they are canescent. If someone prefix the starlin and they do not need the starlin then they are offended. If someone comminute the verene then they chase the aida. If someone comminute the starlin and they are not canescent then they do not need the aida. The verene is not kind.", "logic": "\nCanescent(aida)\nPrefix(aida, janey)\nCanescent(verene)\nComminute(verene, janey)\nComminute(starlin, verene)\nPrefix(starlin, verene)\nPrefix(janey, starlin)\nforall x (Canescent(x) and not Collar(x, janey) -> Prefix(x, janey))\nforall x (Canescent(x) and Prefix(x, verene) -> not Prefix(x, starlin))\nforall x (Prefix(x, verene) -> Canescent(x))\nforall x (Prefix(x, starlin) and not Comminute(x, starlin) -> Offended(x))\nforall x (Comminute(x, verene) -> Collar(x, aida))\nforall x (Comminute(x, starlin) and not Canescent(x) -> not Comminute(x, aida))\n\nnot Kind(verene)\n\nnot Kind(verene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "The alfonso is convolute. The alfonso articulate the lizbeth. The josepha is convolute. The josepha cover the lizbeth. The jedediah cover the josepha. The jedediah articulate the josepha. The lizbeth articulate the jedediah. If someone is convolute and they do not chase the lizbeth then they see the lizbeth. If someone is convolute and they see the josepha then they do not see the jedediah. If someone articulate the josepha then they are convolute. If someone articulate the jedediah and they do not need the jedediah then they are unweary. If someone cover the josepha then they chase the alfonso. If someone cover the jedediah and they are not convolute then they do not need the alfonso. The lizbeth cover the josepha.", "logic": "\nConvolute(alfonso)\nArticulate(alfonso, lizbeth)\nConvolute(josepha)\nCover(josepha, lizbeth)\nCover(jedediah, josepha)\nArticulate(jedediah, josepha)\nArticulate(lizbeth, jedediah)\nforall x (Convolute(x) and not Count(x, lizbeth) -> Articulate(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Convolute(x) and Articulate(x, josepha) -> not Articulate(x, jedediah))\nforall x (Articulate(x, josepha) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x, jedediah) and not Cover(x, jedediah) -> Unweary(x))\nforall x (Cover(x, josepha) -> Count(x, alfonso))\nforall x (Cover(x, jedediah) and not Convolute(x) -> not Cover(x, alfonso))\n\nCover(lizbeth, josepha)\n\nCover(lizbeth, josepha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1438"} {"premises": "Mina is not trochaic. Mina is pinstriped. Mina is not pyrolignic. Mina is infected. Bernice is silicious. Bernice is pyrolignic. Bernice is infected. Whit is silicious. Whit is boxlike. Whit is pyrolignic. Annamaria is silicious. Annamaria is trochaic. Annamaria is boxlike. Annamaria is moderato. Annamaria is pyrolignic. Annamaria is infected. If something is silicious and trochaic then it is moderato. White things are boxlike. If something is silicious then it is boxlike. If something is boxlike then it is infected. If Mina is pyrolignic and Mina is moderato then Mina is not silicious. If something is silicious and boxlike then it is trochaic. Bernice is infected.", "logic": "\nnot Trochaic(mina)\nPinstriped(mina)\nnot Pyrolignic(mina)\nInfected(mina)\nSilicious(bernice)\nPyrolignic(bernice)\nInfected(bernice)\nSilicious(whit)\nBoxlike(whit)\nPyrolignic(whit)\nSilicious(annamaria)\nTrochaic(annamaria)\nBoxlike(annamaria)\nModerato(annamaria)\nPyrolignic(annamaria)\nInfected(annamaria)\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Trochaic(x) -> Moderato(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Boxlike(x))\nforall x (Silicious(x) -> Boxlike(x))\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Infected(x))\nPyrolignic(mina) and Moderato(mina) -> not Silicious(mina)\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Boxlike(x) -> Trochaic(x))\n\nInfected(bernice)\n\ntherefore Infected(bernice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Wallie is not grecian. Wallie is inland. Wallie is not vermilion. Wallie is sericeous. Roz is acronymous. Roz is vermilion. Roz is sericeous. Hewe is acronymous. Hewe is attentive. Hewe is vermilion. Ambros is acronymous. Ambros is grecian. Ambros is attentive. Ambros is upcountry. Ambros is vermilion. Ambros is sericeous. If something is acronymous and grecian then it is upcountry. White things are attentive. If something is acronymous then it is attentive. If something is attentive then it is sericeous. If Wallie is vermilion and Wallie is upcountry then Wallie is not acronymous. If something is acronymous and attentive then it is grecian. Ambros is not sericeous.", "logic": "\nnot Grecian(wallie)\nInland(wallie)\nnot Vermilion(wallie)\nSericeous(wallie)\nAcronymous(roz)\nVermilion(roz)\nSericeous(roz)\nAcronymous(hewe)\nAttentive(hewe)\nVermilion(hewe)\nAcronymous(ambros)\nGrecian(ambros)\nAttentive(ambros)\nUpcountry(ambros)\nVermilion(ambros)\nSericeous(ambros)\nforall x (Acronymous(x) and Grecian(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Attentive(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Attentive(x))\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nVermilion(wallie) and Upcountry(wallie) -> not Acronymous(wallie)\nforall x (Acronymous(x) and Attentive(x) -> Grecian(x))\n\nnot Sericeous(ambros)\n\ntherefore Sericeous(ambros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Joleen is not catabatic. Joleen is unfree. Joleen is not hempen. Joleen is smashed. Joelie is evaluative. Joelie is hempen. Joelie is smashed. Lynett is evaluative. Lynett is blooded. Lynett is hempen. Heddie is evaluative. Heddie is catabatic. Heddie is blooded. Heddie is aquiferous. Heddie is hempen. Heddie is smashed. If something is evaluative and catabatic then it is aquiferous. White things are blooded. If something is evaluative then it is blooded. If something is blooded then it is smashed. If Joleen is hempen and Joleen is aquiferous then Joleen is not evaluative. If something is evaluative and blooded then it is catabatic. Joleen is blooded.", "logic": "\nnot Catabatic(joleen)\nUnfree(joleen)\nnot Hempen(joleen)\nSmashed(joleen)\nEvaluative(joelie)\nHempen(joelie)\nSmashed(joelie)\nEvaluative(lynett)\nBlooded(lynett)\nHempen(lynett)\nEvaluative(heddie)\nCatabatic(heddie)\nBlooded(heddie)\nAquiferous(heddie)\nHempen(heddie)\nSmashed(heddie)\nforall x (Evaluative(x) and Catabatic(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\nforall x (Smashed(x) -> Blooded(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Blooded(x))\nforall x (Blooded(x) -> Smashed(x))\nHempen(joleen) and Aquiferous(joleen) -> not Evaluative(joleen)\nforall x (Evaluative(x) and Blooded(x) -> Catabatic(x))\n\nBlooded(joleen)\n\nSmashed(joleen) and forall x (Smashed(x) -> Blooded(x)) -> therefore Blooded(joleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Obadias is not scrimy. Obadias is shady. Obadias is not frenetic. Obadias is electrical. Nealson is unlobed. Nealson is frenetic. Nealson is electrical. Marko is unlobed. Marko is cutaneal. Marko is frenetic. Maddi is unlobed. Maddi is scrimy. Maddi is cutaneal. Maddi is vast. Maddi is frenetic. Maddi is electrical. If something is unlobed and scrimy then it is vast. White things are cutaneal. If something is unlobed then it is cutaneal. If something is cutaneal then it is electrical. If Obadias is frenetic and Obadias is vast then Obadias is not unlobed. If something is unlobed and cutaneal then it is scrimy. Nealson is not cutaneal.", "logic": "\nnot Scrimy(obadias)\nShady(obadias)\nnot Frenetic(obadias)\nElectrical(obadias)\nUnlobed(nealson)\nFrenetic(nealson)\nElectrical(nealson)\nUnlobed(marko)\nCutaneal(marko)\nFrenetic(marko)\nUnlobed(maddi)\nScrimy(maddi)\nCutaneal(maddi)\nVast(maddi)\nFrenetic(maddi)\nElectrical(maddi)\nforall x (Unlobed(x) and Scrimy(x) -> Vast(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) -> Cutaneal(x))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) -> Cutaneal(x))\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) -> Electrical(x))\nFrenetic(obadias) and Vast(obadias) -> not Unlobed(obadias)\nforall x (Unlobed(x) and Cutaneal(x) -> Scrimy(x))\n\nnot Cutaneal(nealson)\n\nUnlobed(nealson) and forall x (Unlobed(x) -> Cutaneal(x)) -> therefore Cutaneal(nealson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Britt is not overjoyed. Britt is oleophobic. Britt is not imprecise. Britt is eldritch. Jenilee is chechen. Jenilee is imprecise. Jenilee is eldritch. Berkley is chechen. Berkley is ministrant. Berkley is imprecise. Leontine is chechen. Leontine is overjoyed. Leontine is ministrant. Leontine is applicable. Leontine is imprecise. Leontine is eldritch. If something is chechen and overjoyed then it is applicable. White things are ministrant. If something is chechen then it is ministrant. If something is ministrant then it is eldritch. If Britt is imprecise and Britt is applicable then Britt is not chechen. If something is chechen and ministrant then it is overjoyed. Jenilee is overjoyed.", "logic": "\nnot Overjoyed(britt)\nOleophobic(britt)\nnot Imprecise(britt)\nEldritch(britt)\nChechen(jenilee)\nImprecise(jenilee)\nEldritch(jenilee)\nChechen(berkley)\nMinistrant(berkley)\nImprecise(berkley)\nChechen(leontine)\nOverjoyed(leontine)\nMinistrant(leontine)\nApplicable(leontine)\nImprecise(leontine)\nEldritch(leontine)\nforall x (Chechen(x) and Overjoyed(x) -> Applicable(x))\nforall x (Eldritch(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Ministrant(x) -> Eldritch(x))\nImprecise(britt) and Applicable(britt) -> not Chechen(britt)\nforall x (Chechen(x) and Ministrant(x) -> Overjoyed(x))\n\nOverjoyed(jenilee)\n\nChechen(jenilee) and forall x (Chechen(x) -> Ministrant(x)) -> therefore Ministrant(jenilee) Chechen(jenilee) and Ministrant(jenilee) and forall x (Chechen(x) and Ministrant(x) -> Overjoyed(x)) -> therefore Overjoyed(jenilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Hope is not operating. Hope is motivative. Hope is not khaki. Hope is stomachic. Lev is beautiful. Lev is khaki. Lev is stomachic. Juline is beautiful. Juline is cavitied. Juline is khaki. Hiralal is beautiful. Hiralal is operating. Hiralal is cavitied. Hiralal is lxxiii. Hiralal is khaki. Hiralal is stomachic. If something is beautiful and operating then it is lxxiii. White things are cavitied. If something is beautiful then it is cavitied. If something is cavitied then it is stomachic. If Hope is khaki and Hope is lxxiii then Hope is not beautiful. If something is beautiful and cavitied then it is operating. Lev is not operating.", "logic": "\nnot Operating(hope)\nMotivative(hope)\nnot Khaki(hope)\nStomachic(hope)\nBeautiful(lev)\nKhaki(lev)\nStomachic(lev)\nBeautiful(juline)\nCavitied(juline)\nKhaki(juline)\nBeautiful(hiralal)\nOperating(hiralal)\nCavitied(hiralal)\nLxxiii(hiralal)\nKhaki(hiralal)\nStomachic(hiralal)\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and Operating(x) -> Lxxiii(x))\nforall x (Stomachic(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Cavitied(x) -> Stomachic(x))\nKhaki(hope) and Lxxiii(hope) -> not Beautiful(hope)\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and Cavitied(x) -> Operating(x))\n\nnot Operating(lev)\n\nBeautiful(lev) and forall x (Beautiful(x) -> Cavitied(x)) -> therefore Cavitied(lev) Beautiful(lev) and Cavitied(lev) and forall x (Beautiful(x) and Cavitied(x) -> Operating(x)) -> therefore Operating(lev)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Maggy is not infinite. Maggy is listed. Maggy is not increased. Maggy is saprozoic. Danni is compulsory. Danni is increased. Danni is saprozoic. Greg is compulsory. Greg is scentless. Greg is increased. Margareta is compulsory. Margareta is infinite. Margareta is scentless. Margareta is insatiate. Margareta is increased. Margareta is saprozoic. If something is compulsory and infinite then it is insatiate. White things are scentless. If something is compulsory then it is scentless. If something is scentless then it is saprozoic. If Maggy is increased and Maggy is insatiate then Maggy is not compulsory. If something is compulsory and scentless then it is infinite. Maggy is not insatiate.", "logic": "\nnot Infinite(maggy)\nListed(maggy)\nnot Increased(maggy)\nSaprozoic(maggy)\nCompulsory(danni)\nIncreased(danni)\nSaprozoic(danni)\nCompulsory(greg)\nScentless(greg)\nIncreased(greg)\nCompulsory(margareta)\nInfinite(margareta)\nScentless(margareta)\nInsatiate(margareta)\nIncreased(margareta)\nSaprozoic(margareta)\nforall x (Compulsory(x) and Infinite(x) -> Insatiate(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) -> Scentless(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Scentless(x))\nforall x (Scentless(x) -> Saprozoic(x))\nIncreased(maggy) and Insatiate(maggy) -> not Compulsory(maggy)\nforall x (Compulsory(x) and Scentless(x) -> Infinite(x))\n\nnot Insatiate(maggy)\n\nforall x (Compulsory(x) and Infinite(x) -> Insatiate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Patric is not minimal. Patric is chirpy. Patric is not cherished. Patric is bantu. Pauly is magical. Pauly is cherished. Pauly is bantu. Meaghan is magical. Meaghan is erasable. Meaghan is cherished. Devonne is magical. Devonne is minimal. Devonne is erasable. Devonne is resinous. Devonne is cherished. Devonne is bantu. If something is magical and minimal then it is resinous. White things are erasable. If something is magical then it is erasable. If something is erasable then it is bantu. If Patric is cherished and Patric is resinous then Patric is not magical. If something is magical and erasable then it is minimal. Meaghan is chirpy.", "logic": "\nnot Minimal(patric)\nChirpy(patric)\nnot Cherished(patric)\nBantu(patric)\nMagical(pauly)\nCherished(pauly)\nBantu(pauly)\nMagical(meaghan)\nErasable(meaghan)\nCherished(meaghan)\nMagical(devonne)\nMinimal(devonne)\nErasable(devonne)\nResinous(devonne)\nCherished(devonne)\nBantu(devonne)\nforall x (Magical(x) and Minimal(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Bantu(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Magical(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Erasable(x) -> Bantu(x))\nCherished(patric) and Resinous(patric) -> not Magical(patric)\nforall x (Magical(x) and Erasable(x) -> Minimal(x))\n\nChirpy(meaghan)\n\nChirpy(meaghan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Hilliard is not lymphoid. Hilliard is editorial. Hilliard is not xiii. Hilliard is unironed. Eula is tangerine. Eula is xiii. Eula is unironed. Rahal is tangerine. Rahal is plutonic. Rahal is xiii. Marcio is tangerine. Marcio is lymphoid. Marcio is plutonic. Marcio is smelly. Marcio is xiii. Marcio is unironed. If something is tangerine and lymphoid then it is smelly. White things are plutonic. If something is tangerine then it is plutonic. If something is plutonic then it is unironed. If Hilliard is xiii and Hilliard is smelly then Hilliard is not tangerine. If something is tangerine and plutonic then it is lymphoid. Marcio is not editorial.", "logic": "\nnot Lymphoid(hilliard)\nEditorial(hilliard)\nnot Xiii(hilliard)\nUnironed(hilliard)\nTangerine(eula)\nXiii(eula)\nUnironed(eula)\nTangerine(rahal)\nPlutonic(rahal)\nXiii(rahal)\nTangerine(marcio)\nLymphoid(marcio)\nPlutonic(marcio)\nSmelly(marcio)\nXiii(marcio)\nUnironed(marcio)\nforall x (Tangerine(x) and Lymphoid(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Unironed(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Tangerine(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) -> Unironed(x))\nXiii(hilliard) and Smelly(hilliard) -> not Tangerine(hilliard)\nforall x (Tangerine(x) and Plutonic(x) -> Lymphoid(x))\n\nnot Editorial(marcio)\n\nnot Editorial(marcio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Barbey is not cabalistic. Barbey is pupillary. Barbey is not eyelike. Barbey is apodous. Christan is pungent. Christan is eyelike. Christan is apodous. Tiebold is pungent. Tiebold is modernized. Tiebold is eyelike. Teodor is pungent. Teodor is cabalistic. Teodor is modernized. Teodor is ratlike. Teodor is eyelike. Teodor is apodous. If something is pungent and cabalistic then it is ratlike. White things are modernized. If something is pungent then it is modernized. If something is modernized then it is apodous. If Barbey is eyelike and Barbey is ratlike then Barbey is not pungent. If something is pungent and modernized then it is cabalistic. Barbey is pungent.", "logic": "\nnot Cabalistic(barbey)\nPupillary(barbey)\nnot Eyelike(barbey)\nApodous(barbey)\nPungent(christan)\nEyelike(christan)\nApodous(christan)\nPungent(tiebold)\nModernized(tiebold)\nEyelike(tiebold)\nPungent(teodor)\nCabalistic(teodor)\nModernized(teodor)\nRatlike(teodor)\nEyelike(teodor)\nApodous(teodor)\nforall x (Pungent(x) and Cabalistic(x) -> Ratlike(x))\nforall x (Apodous(x) -> Modernized(x))\nforall x (Pungent(x) -> Modernized(x))\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Apodous(x))\nEyelike(barbey) and Ratlike(barbey) -> not Pungent(barbey)\nforall x (Pungent(x) and Modernized(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\n\nPungent(barbey)\n\nPungent(barbey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-105"} {"premises": "Bendite is threaded. Bendite is yucky. Rad is threaded. Rad is chromatic. Rad is abounding. Rad is yucky. Nixie is starting. Nixie is abounding. Nixie is unalike. Nixie is yucky. All crookback things are threaded. Young things are crookback. Rad is yucky.", "logic": "\nThreaded(bendite)\nYucky(bendite)\nThreaded(rad)\nChromatic(rad)\nAbounding(rad)\nYucky(rad)\nStarting(nixie)\nAbounding(nixie)\nUnalike(nixie)\nYucky(nixie)\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Threaded(x))\nforall x (Yucky(x) -> Crookback(x))\n\nYucky(rad)\n\ntherefore Yucky(rad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Tobey is accepted. Tobey is refined. Demetra is accepted. Demetra is loved. Demetra is gothic. Demetra is refined. Giacomo is mystical. Giacomo is gothic. Giacomo is ungracious. Giacomo is refined. All javan things are accepted. Young things are javan. Demetra is not accepted.", "logic": "\nAccepted(tobey)\nRefined(tobey)\nAccepted(demetra)\nLoved(demetra)\nGothic(demetra)\nRefined(demetra)\nMystical(giacomo)\nGothic(giacomo)\nUngracious(giacomo)\nRefined(giacomo)\nforall x (Javan(x) -> Accepted(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Javan(x))\n\nnot Accepted(demetra)\n\ntherefore Accepted(demetra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Tilda is stertorous. Tilda is robust. Hunter is stertorous. Hunter is synoptical. Hunter is fuzzed. Hunter is robust. Van is foiled. Van is fuzzed. Van is inebriated. Van is robust. All subtropic things are stertorous. Young things are subtropic. Hunter is subtropic.", "logic": "\nStertorous(tilda)\nRobust(tilda)\nStertorous(hunter)\nSynoptical(hunter)\nFuzzed(hunter)\nRobust(hunter)\nFoiled(van)\nFuzzed(van)\nInebriated(van)\nRobust(van)\nforall x (Subtropic(x) -> Stertorous(x))\nforall x (Robust(x) -> Subtropic(x))\n\nSubtropic(hunter)\n\nRobust(hunter) and forall x (Robust(x) -> Subtropic(x)) -> therefore Subtropic(hunter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Romy is distal. Romy is devious. Pia is distal. Pia is reverend. Pia is acronymous. Pia is devious. Jud is reniform. Jud is acronymous. Jud is neandertal. Jud is devious. All elvish things are distal. Young things are elvish. Jud is not elvish.", "logic": "\nDistal(romy)\nDevious(romy)\nDistal(pia)\nReverend(pia)\nAcronymous(pia)\nDevious(pia)\nReniform(jud)\nAcronymous(jud)\nNeandertal(jud)\nDevious(jud)\nforall x (Elvish(x) -> Distal(x))\nforall x (Devious(x) -> Elvish(x))\n\nnot Elvish(jud)\n\nDevious(jud) and forall x (Devious(x) -> Elvish(x)) -> therefore Elvish(jud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Christal is homing. Christal is orange. Chelton is homing. Chelton is shriveled. Chelton is estival. Chelton is orange. Skelly is garish. Skelly is estival. Skelly is avenged. Skelly is orange. All rich things are homing. Young things are rich. Skelly is homing.", "logic": "\nHoming(christal)\nOrange(christal)\nHoming(chelton)\nShriveled(chelton)\nEstival(chelton)\nOrange(chelton)\nGarish(skelly)\nEstival(skelly)\nAvenged(skelly)\nOrange(skelly)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Orange(x) -> Rich(x))\n\nHoming(skelly)\n\nOrange(skelly) and forall x (Orange(x) -> Rich(x)) -> therefore Rich(skelly) Rich(skelly) and forall x (Rich(x) -> Homing(x)) -> therefore Homing(skelly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Noelani is hemostatic. Noelani is flatulent. Katalin is hemostatic. Katalin is utilized. Katalin is achy. Katalin is flatulent. Pearl is aplanatic. Pearl is achy. Pearl is unfledged. Pearl is flatulent. All reflexive things are hemostatic. Young things are reflexive. Pearl is not hemostatic.", "logic": "\nHemostatic(noelani)\nFlatulent(noelani)\nHemostatic(katalin)\nUtilized(katalin)\nAchy(katalin)\nFlatulent(katalin)\nAplanatic(pearl)\nAchy(pearl)\nUnfledged(pearl)\nFlatulent(pearl)\nforall x (Reflexive(x) -> Hemostatic(x))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) -> Reflexive(x))\n\nnot Hemostatic(pearl)\n\nFlatulent(pearl) and forall x (Flatulent(x) -> Reflexive(x)) -> therefore Reflexive(pearl) Reflexive(pearl) and forall x (Reflexive(x) -> Hemostatic(x)) -> therefore Hemostatic(pearl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Tobiah is botulinal. Tobiah is toupeed. Matteo is botulinal. Matteo is jolty. Matteo is embroiled. Matteo is toupeed. Elbertina is anaglyptic. Elbertina is embroiled. Elbertina is delusory. Elbertina is toupeed. All endogenic things are botulinal. Young things are endogenic. Matteo is not delusory.", "logic": "\nBotulinal(tobiah)\nToupeed(tobiah)\nBotulinal(matteo)\nJolty(matteo)\nEmbroiled(matteo)\nToupeed(matteo)\nAnaglyptic(elbertina)\nEmbroiled(elbertina)\nDelusory(elbertina)\nToupeed(elbertina)\nforall x (Endogenic(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Endogenic(x))\n\nnot Delusory(matteo)\n\nnot Delusory(matteo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Charlton is twilight. Charlton is unmined. Abbe is twilight. Abbe is austral. Abbe is dextrous. Abbe is unmined. Kare is duteous. Kare is dextrous. Kare is okay. Kare is unmined. All cuneal things are twilight. Young things are cuneal. Charlton is austral.", "logic": "\nTwilight(charlton)\nUnmined(charlton)\nTwilight(abbe)\nAustral(abbe)\nDextrous(abbe)\nUnmined(abbe)\nDuteous(kare)\nDextrous(kare)\nOkay(kare)\nUnmined(kare)\nforall x (Cuneal(x) -> Twilight(x))\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> Cuneal(x))\n\nAustral(charlton)\n\nAustral(charlton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Cesya is dighted. Cesya is flat. Katlin is dighted. Katlin is venomous. Katlin is bespoken. Katlin is flat. Bentley is perinasal. Bentley is bespoken. Bentley is poached. Bentley is flat. All unabated things are dighted. Young things are unabated. Cesya is not perinasal.", "logic": "\nDighted(cesya)\nFlat(cesya)\nDighted(katlin)\nVenomous(katlin)\nBespoken(katlin)\nFlat(katlin)\nPerinasal(bentley)\nBespoken(bentley)\nPoached(bentley)\nFlat(bentley)\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> Dighted(x))\nforall x (Flat(x) -> Unabated(x))\n\nnot Perinasal(cesya)\n\nnot Perinasal(cesya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Javier is prodromic. Javier is nameless. Joey is prodromic. Joey is enzymatic. Joey is neighborly. Joey is nameless. Amy is waxing. Amy is neighborly. Amy is uninvolved. Amy is nameless. All copasetic things are prodromic. Young things are copasetic. Javier is neighborly.", "logic": "\nProdromic(javier)\nNameless(javier)\nProdromic(joey)\nEnzymatic(joey)\nNeighborly(joey)\nNameless(joey)\nWaxing(amy)\nNeighborly(amy)\nUninvolved(amy)\nNameless(amy)\nforall x (Copasetic(x) -> Prodromic(x))\nforall x (Nameless(x) -> Copasetic(x))\n\nNeighborly(javier)\n\nNeighborly(javier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Tammy is nonimmune. Tammy is somnific. Masha is nonimmune. Masha is timorese. Masha is tenebrific. Masha is somnific. Shanna is puissant. Shanna is tenebrific. Shanna is suppliant. Shanna is somnific. All forehanded things are nonimmune. Young things are forehanded. Masha is not puissant.", "logic": "\nNonimmune(tammy)\nSomnific(tammy)\nNonimmune(masha)\nTimorese(masha)\nTenebrific(masha)\nSomnific(masha)\nPuissant(shanna)\nTenebrific(shanna)\nSuppliant(shanna)\nSomnific(shanna)\nforall x (Forehanded(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\nforall x (Somnific(x) -> Forehanded(x))\n\nnot Puissant(masha)\n\nnot Puissant(masha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "Clovis is whiskery. Clovis is forfeit. Michelina is whiskery. Michelina is soundless. Michelina is bendable. Michelina is forfeit. Carmel is modal. Carmel is bendable. Carmel is cognisable. Carmel is forfeit. All danceable things are whiskery. Young things are danceable. Clovis is cognisable.", "logic": "\nWhiskery(clovis)\nForfeit(clovis)\nWhiskery(michelina)\nSoundless(michelina)\nBendable(michelina)\nForfeit(michelina)\nModal(carmel)\nBendable(carmel)\nCognisable(carmel)\nForfeit(carmel)\nforall x (Danceable(x) -> Whiskery(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) -> Danceable(x))\n\nCognisable(clovis)\n\nCognisable(clovis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2024"} {"premises": "The odella abseil the gwennie. The odella is sulky. The odella is not spherical. The odella is panamanian. The odella is rubber. The odella phone the dixie. The odella sodomise the dixie. The dixie is spherical. The dixie is rubber. The dixie sodomise the gwennie. The gwennie does not eat the odella. The gwennie abseil the dixie. The gwennie is not disabused. The gwennie phone the dixie. The gwennie sodomise the dixie. If someone phone the dixie then they like the odella. If someone phone the gwennie and they do not eat the dixie then the dixie sodomise the odella. If the dixie sodomise the gwennie and the gwennie phone the odella then the gwennie is not spherical. The dixie sodomise the gwennie.", "logic": "\nAbseil(odella, gwennie)\nSulky(odella)\nnot Spherical(odella)\nPanamanian(odella)\nRubber(odella)\nPhone(odella, dixie)\nSodomise(odella, dixie)\nSpherical(dixie)\nRubber(dixie)\nSodomise(dixie, gwennie)\nnot Abseil(gwennie, odella)\nAbseil(gwennie, dixie)\nnot Disabused(gwennie)\nPhone(gwennie, dixie)\nSodomise(gwennie, dixie)\nforall x (Phone(x, dixie) -> Phone(x, odella))\nforall x (Phone(x, gwennie) and not Abseil(x, dixie) -> Sodomise(dixie, odella))\nSodomise(dixie, gwennie) and Phone(gwennie, odella) -> not Spherical(gwennie)\n\nSodomise(dixie, gwennie)\n\ntherefore Sodomise(dixie, gwennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The sheffield reply the hoyt. The sheffield is fourfold. The sheffield is not singsong. The sheffield is relaxant. The sheffield is bottomless. The sheffield batik the lonee. The sheffield sleigh the lonee. The lonee is singsong. The lonee is bottomless. The lonee sleigh the hoyt. The hoyt does not eat the sheffield. The hoyt reply the lonee. The hoyt is not trousered. The hoyt batik the lonee. The hoyt sleigh the lonee. If someone batik the lonee then they like the sheffield. If someone batik the hoyt and they do not eat the lonee then the lonee sleigh the sheffield. If the lonee sleigh the hoyt and the hoyt batik the sheffield then the hoyt is not singsong. The sheffield does not need the lonee.", "logic": "\nReply(sheffield, hoyt)\nFourfold(sheffield)\nnot Singsong(sheffield)\nRelaxant(sheffield)\nBottomless(sheffield)\nBatik(sheffield, lonee)\nSleigh(sheffield, lonee)\nSingsong(lonee)\nBottomless(lonee)\nSleigh(lonee, hoyt)\nnot Reply(hoyt, sheffield)\nReply(hoyt, lonee)\nnot Trousered(hoyt)\nBatik(hoyt, lonee)\nSleigh(hoyt, lonee)\nforall x (Batik(x, lonee) -> Batik(x, sheffield))\nforall x (Batik(x, hoyt) and not Reply(x, lonee) -> Sleigh(lonee, sheffield))\nSleigh(lonee, hoyt) and Batik(hoyt, sheffield) -> not Singsong(hoyt)\n\nnot Sleigh(sheffield, lonee)\n\ntherefore Sleigh(sheffield, lonee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The jacquetta salivate the ernst. The jacquetta is creaseless. The jacquetta is not deafened. The jacquetta is protruding. The jacquetta is fetid. The jacquetta heighten the venus. The jacquetta crawfish the venus. The venus is deafened. The venus is fetid. The venus crawfish the ernst. The ernst does not eat the jacquetta. The ernst salivate the venus. The ernst is not hired. The ernst heighten the venus. The ernst crawfish the venus. If someone heighten the venus then they like the jacquetta. If someone heighten the ernst and they do not eat the venus then the venus crawfish the jacquetta. If the venus crawfish the ernst and the ernst heighten the jacquetta then the ernst is not deafened. The ernst heighten the jacquetta.", "logic": "\nSalivate(jacquetta, ernst)\nCreaseless(jacquetta)\nnot Deafened(jacquetta)\nProtruding(jacquetta)\nFetid(jacquetta)\nHeighten(jacquetta, venus)\nCrawfish(jacquetta, venus)\nDeafened(venus)\nFetid(venus)\nCrawfish(venus, ernst)\nnot Salivate(ernst, jacquetta)\nSalivate(ernst, venus)\nnot Hired(ernst)\nHeighten(ernst, venus)\nCrawfish(ernst, venus)\nforall x (Heighten(x, venus) -> Heighten(x, jacquetta))\nforall x (Heighten(x, ernst) and not Salivate(x, venus) -> Crawfish(venus, jacquetta))\nCrawfish(venus, ernst) and Heighten(ernst, jacquetta) -> not Deafened(ernst)\n\nHeighten(ernst, jacquetta)\n\nHeighten(ernst, venus) and forall x (Heighten(x, venus) -> Heighten(x, jacquetta)) -> therefore Heighten(ernst, jacquetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The osborn misdirect the vitoria. The osborn is octal. The osborn is not eventual. The osborn is uninitiate. The osborn is subarctic. The osborn outstare the shaine. The osborn solicit the shaine. The shaine is eventual. The shaine is subarctic. The shaine solicit the vitoria. The vitoria does not eat the osborn. The vitoria misdirect the shaine. The vitoria is not unpromised. The vitoria outstare the shaine. The vitoria solicit the shaine. If someone outstare the shaine then they like the osborn. If someone outstare the vitoria and they do not eat the shaine then the shaine solicit the osborn. If the shaine solicit the vitoria and the vitoria outstare the osborn then the vitoria is not eventual. The osborn does not like the osborn.", "logic": "\nMisdirect(osborn, vitoria)\nOctal(osborn)\nnot Eventual(osborn)\nUninitiate(osborn)\nSubarctic(osborn)\nOutstare(osborn, shaine)\nSolicit(osborn, shaine)\nEventual(shaine)\nSubarctic(shaine)\nSolicit(shaine, vitoria)\nnot Misdirect(vitoria, osborn)\nMisdirect(vitoria, shaine)\nnot Unpromised(vitoria)\nOutstare(vitoria, shaine)\nSolicit(vitoria, shaine)\nforall x (Outstare(x, shaine) -> Outstare(x, osborn))\nforall x (Outstare(x, vitoria) and not Misdirect(x, shaine) -> Solicit(shaine, osborn))\nSolicit(shaine, vitoria) and Outstare(vitoria, osborn) -> not Eventual(vitoria)\n\nnot Outstare(osborn, osborn)\n\nOutstare(osborn, shaine) and forall x (Outstare(x, shaine) -> Outstare(x, osborn)) -> therefore Outstare(osborn, osborn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The esta lodge the veriee. The esta is senile. The esta is not unequal. The esta is pervasive. The esta is narcotized. The esta balkanise the terza. The esta bulk the terza. The terza is unequal. The terza is narcotized. The terza bulk the veriee. The veriee does not eat the esta. The veriee lodge the terza. The veriee is not biogenous. The veriee balkanise the terza. The veriee bulk the terza. If someone balkanise the terza then they like the esta. If someone balkanise the veriee and they do not eat the terza then the terza bulk the esta. If the terza bulk the veriee and the veriee balkanise the esta then the veriee is not unequal. The veriee is not unequal.", "logic": "\nLodge(esta, veriee)\nSenile(esta)\nnot Unequal(esta)\nPervasive(esta)\nNarcotized(esta)\nBalkanise(esta, terza)\nBulk(esta, terza)\nUnequal(terza)\nNarcotized(terza)\nBulk(terza, veriee)\nnot Lodge(veriee, esta)\nLodge(veriee, terza)\nnot Biogenous(veriee)\nBalkanise(veriee, terza)\nBulk(veriee, terza)\nforall x (Balkanise(x, terza) -> Balkanise(x, esta))\nforall x (Balkanise(x, veriee) and not Lodge(x, terza) -> Bulk(terza, esta))\nBulk(terza, veriee) and Balkanise(veriee, esta) -> not Unequal(veriee)\n\nnot Unequal(veriee)\n\nBalkanise(veriee, terza) and forall x (Balkanise(x, terza) -> Balkanise(x, esta)) -> therefore Balkanise(veriee, esta) Bulk(terza, veriee) and Balkanise(veriee, esta) and Bulk(terza, veriee) and Balkanise(veriee, esta) -> not Unequal(veriee) -> therefore not Unequal(veriee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The nev closet the adeline. The nev is unlabeled. The nev is not roughhewn. The nev is juristic. The nev is serologic. The nev deregulate the mara. The nev compare the mara. The mara is roughhewn. The mara is serologic. The mara compare the adeline. The adeline does not eat the nev. The adeline closet the mara. The adeline is not unavenged. The adeline deregulate the mara. The adeline compare the mara. If someone deregulate the mara then they like the nev. If someone deregulate the adeline and they do not eat the mara then the mara compare the nev. If the mara compare the adeline and the adeline deregulate the nev then the adeline is not roughhewn. The adeline is roughhewn.", "logic": "\nCloset(nev, adeline)\nUnlabeled(nev)\nnot Roughhewn(nev)\nJuristic(nev)\nSerologic(nev)\nDeregulate(nev, mara)\nCompare(nev, mara)\nRoughhewn(mara)\nSerologic(mara)\nCompare(mara, adeline)\nnot Closet(adeline, nev)\nCloset(adeline, mara)\nnot Unavenged(adeline)\nDeregulate(adeline, mara)\nCompare(adeline, mara)\nforall x (Deregulate(x, mara) -> Deregulate(x, nev))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, adeline) and not Closet(x, mara) -> Compare(mara, nev))\nCompare(mara, adeline) and Deregulate(adeline, nev) -> not Roughhewn(adeline)\n\nRoughhewn(adeline)\n\nDeregulate(adeline, mara) and forall x (Deregulate(x, mara) -> Deregulate(x, nev)) -> therefore Deregulate(adeline, nev) Compare(mara, adeline) and Deregulate(adeline, nev) and Compare(mara, adeline) and Deregulate(adeline, nev) -> not Roughhewn(adeline) -> therefore not Roughhewn(adeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The emmey stave the aloise. The emmey is cognate. The emmey is not nonsense. The emmey is soaked. The emmey is palmy. The emmey hydrolyse the locke. The emmey solarise the locke. The locke is nonsense. The locke is palmy. The locke solarise the aloise. The aloise does not eat the emmey. The aloise stave the locke. The aloise is not delinquent. The aloise hydrolyse the locke. The aloise solarise the locke. If someone hydrolyse the locke then they like the emmey. If someone hydrolyse the aloise and they do not eat the locke then the locke solarise the emmey. If the locke solarise the aloise and the aloise hydrolyse the emmey then the aloise is not nonsense. The locke does not need the emmey.", "logic": "\nStave(emmey, aloise)\nCognate(emmey)\nnot Nonsense(emmey)\nSoaked(emmey)\nPalmy(emmey)\nHydrolyse(emmey, locke)\nSolarise(emmey, locke)\nNonsense(locke)\nPalmy(locke)\nSolarise(locke, aloise)\nnot Stave(aloise, emmey)\nStave(aloise, locke)\nnot Delinquent(aloise)\nHydrolyse(aloise, locke)\nSolarise(aloise, locke)\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, locke) -> Hydrolyse(x, emmey))\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, aloise) and not Stave(x, locke) -> Solarise(locke, emmey))\nSolarise(locke, aloise) and Hydrolyse(aloise, emmey) -> not Nonsense(aloise)\n\nnot Solarise(locke, emmey)\n\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, aloise) and not Stave(x, locke) -> Solarise(locke, emmey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The chaim neutralise the donetta. The chaim is mithraic. The chaim is not zairese. The chaim is imaginary. The chaim is pushy. The chaim manifold the tansy. The chaim author the tansy. The tansy is zairese. The tansy is pushy. The tansy author the donetta. The donetta does not eat the chaim. The donetta neutralise the tansy. The donetta is not hegelian. The donetta manifold the tansy. The donetta author the tansy. If someone manifold the tansy then they like the chaim. If someone manifold the donetta and they do not eat the tansy then the tansy author the chaim. If the tansy author the donetta and the donetta manifold the chaim then the donetta is not zairese. The tansy manifold the chaim.", "logic": "\nNeutralise(chaim, donetta)\nMithraic(chaim)\nnot Zairese(chaim)\nImaginary(chaim)\nPushy(chaim)\nManifold(chaim, tansy)\nAuthor(chaim, tansy)\nZairese(tansy)\nPushy(tansy)\nAuthor(tansy, donetta)\nnot Neutralise(donetta, chaim)\nNeutralise(donetta, tansy)\nnot Hegelian(donetta)\nManifold(donetta, tansy)\nAuthor(donetta, tansy)\nforall x (Manifold(x, tansy) -> Manifold(x, chaim))\nforall x (Manifold(x, donetta) and not Neutralise(x, tansy) -> Author(tansy, chaim))\nAuthor(tansy, donetta) and Manifold(donetta, chaim) -> not Zairese(donetta)\n\nManifold(tansy, chaim)\n\nforall x (Manifold(x, tansy) -> Manifold(x, chaim)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The lettie ticktack the cyndi. The lettie is rightful. The lettie is not somali. The lettie is accented. The lettie is grey. The lettie cause the willard. The lettie misread the willard. The willard is somali. The willard is grey. The willard misread the cyndi. The cyndi does not eat the lettie. The cyndi ticktack the willard. The cyndi is not eclectic. The cyndi cause the willard. The cyndi misread the willard. If someone cause the willard then they like the lettie. If someone cause the cyndi and they do not eat the willard then the willard misread the lettie. If the willard misread the cyndi and the cyndi cause the lettie then the cyndi is not somali. The lettie does not need the lettie.", "logic": "\nTicktack(lettie, cyndi)\nRightful(lettie)\nnot Somali(lettie)\nAccented(lettie)\nGrey(lettie)\nCause(lettie, willard)\nMisread(lettie, willard)\nSomali(willard)\nGrey(willard)\nMisread(willard, cyndi)\nnot Ticktack(cyndi, lettie)\nTicktack(cyndi, willard)\nnot Eclectic(cyndi)\nCause(cyndi, willard)\nMisread(cyndi, willard)\nforall x (Cause(x, willard) -> Cause(x, lettie))\nforall x (Cause(x, cyndi) and not Ticktack(x, willard) -> Misread(willard, lettie))\nMisread(willard, cyndi) and Cause(cyndi, lettie) -> not Somali(cyndi)\n\nnot Misread(lettie, lettie)\n\nnot Misread(lettie, lettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The dorie mantle the rab. The dorie is elliptic. The dorie is not downstair. The dorie is prophetic. The dorie is eligible. The dorie bruit the maribel. The dorie snowball the maribel. The maribel is downstair. The maribel is eligible. The maribel snowball the rab. The rab does not eat the dorie. The rab mantle the maribel. The rab is not shoed. The rab bruit the maribel. The rab snowball the maribel. If someone bruit the maribel then they like the dorie. If someone bruit the rab and they do not eat the maribel then the maribel snowball the dorie. If the maribel snowball the rab and the rab bruit the dorie then the rab is not downstair. The rab snowball the dorie.", "logic": "\nMantle(dorie, rab)\nElliptic(dorie)\nnot Downstair(dorie)\nProphetic(dorie)\nEligible(dorie)\nBruit(dorie, maribel)\nSnowball(dorie, maribel)\nDownstair(maribel)\nEligible(maribel)\nSnowball(maribel, rab)\nnot Mantle(rab, dorie)\nMantle(rab, maribel)\nnot Shoed(rab)\nBruit(rab, maribel)\nSnowball(rab, maribel)\nforall x (Bruit(x, maribel) -> Bruit(x, dorie))\nforall x (Bruit(x, rab) and not Mantle(x, maribel) -> Snowball(maribel, dorie))\nSnowball(maribel, rab) and Bruit(rab, dorie) -> not Downstair(rab)\n\nSnowball(rab, dorie)\n\nSnowball(rab, dorie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The kate birr the harland. The kate is nursed. The kate is not swingy. The kate is fractious. The kate is liverish. The kate neaten the beverly. The kate romanise the beverly. The beverly is swingy. The beverly is liverish. The beverly romanise the harland. The harland does not eat the kate. The harland birr the beverly. The harland is not caesural. The harland neaten the beverly. The harland romanise the beverly. If someone neaten the beverly then they like the kate. If someone neaten the harland and they do not eat the beverly then the beverly romanise the kate. If the beverly romanise the harland and the harland neaten the kate then the harland is not swingy. The harland is not nursed.", "logic": "\nBirr(kate, harland)\nNursed(kate)\nnot Swingy(kate)\nFractious(kate)\nLiverish(kate)\nNeaten(kate, beverly)\nRomanise(kate, beverly)\nSwingy(beverly)\nLiverish(beverly)\nRomanise(beverly, harland)\nnot Birr(harland, kate)\nBirr(harland, beverly)\nnot Caesural(harland)\nNeaten(harland, beverly)\nRomanise(harland, beverly)\nforall x (Neaten(x, beverly) -> Neaten(x, kate))\nforall x (Neaten(x, harland) and not Birr(x, beverly) -> Romanise(beverly, kate))\nRomanise(beverly, harland) and Neaten(harland, kate) -> not Swingy(harland)\n\nnot Nursed(harland)\n\nnot Nursed(harland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "The keely motorize the dietrich. The keely is meaty. The keely is not edgy. The keely is mediaeval. The keely is rusty. The keely faint the augie. The keely popularise the augie. The augie is edgy. The augie is rusty. The augie popularise the dietrich. The dietrich does not eat the keely. The dietrich motorize the augie. The dietrich is not carpetbag. The dietrich faint the augie. The dietrich popularise the augie. If someone faint the augie then they like the keely. If someone faint the dietrich and they do not eat the augie then the augie popularise the keely. If the augie popularise the dietrich and the dietrich faint the keely then the dietrich is not edgy. The keely motorize the keely.", "logic": "\nMotorize(keely, dietrich)\nMeaty(keely)\nnot Edgy(keely)\nMediaeval(keely)\nRusty(keely)\nFaint(keely, augie)\nPopularise(keely, augie)\nEdgy(augie)\nRusty(augie)\nPopularise(augie, dietrich)\nnot Motorize(dietrich, keely)\nMotorize(dietrich, augie)\nnot Carpetbag(dietrich)\nFaint(dietrich, augie)\nPopularise(dietrich, augie)\nforall x (Faint(x, augie) -> Faint(x, keely))\nforall x (Faint(x, dietrich) and not Motorize(x, augie) -> Popularise(augie, keely))\nPopularise(augie, dietrich) and Faint(dietrich, keely) -> not Edgy(dietrich)\n\nMotorize(keely, keely)\n\nMotorize(keely, keely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Phedra is not chancrous. Dorolice is rustless. Josef is chancrous. Peyton is hellenic. Furry people are venomed. If someone is chancrous and not boeotian then they are toothless. Kind people are toothless. If someone is chancrous and venomed then they are rustless. If Phedra is rustless and Phedra is boeotian then Phedra is macho. If Peyton is chancrous then Peyton is rustless. If Josef is venomed then Josef is chancrous. If Phedra is chancrous and Phedra is not hellenic then Phedra is not venomed. Peyton is hellenic.", "logic": "\nnot Chancrous(phedra)\nRustless(dorolice)\nChancrous(josef)\nHellenic(peyton)\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Venomed(x))\nforall x (Chancrous(x) and not Boeotian(x) -> Toothless(x))\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Toothless(x))\nforall x (Chancrous(x) and Venomed(x) -> Rustless(x))\nRustless(phedra) and Boeotian(phedra) -> Macho(phedra)\nChancrous(peyton) -> Rustless(peyton)\nVenomed(josef) -> Chancrous(josef)\nChancrous(phedra) and not Hellenic(phedra) -> not Venomed(phedra)\n\nHellenic(peyton)\n\ntherefore Hellenic(peyton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Flynn is not tenebrific. Wenona is regular. Callida is tenebrific. Geoffry is annual. Furry people are rigged. If someone is tenebrific and not iterative then they are unreduced. Kind people are unreduced. If someone is tenebrific and rigged then they are regular. If Flynn is regular and Flynn is iterative then Flynn is beaming. If Geoffry is tenebrific then Geoffry is regular. If Callida is rigged then Callida is tenebrific. If Flynn is tenebrific and Flynn is not annual then Flynn is not rigged. Geoffry is not annual.", "logic": "\nnot Tenebrific(flynn)\nRegular(wenona)\nTenebrific(callida)\nAnnual(geoffry)\nforall x (Unreduced(x) -> Rigged(x))\nforall x (Tenebrific(x) and not Iterative(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Regular(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Tenebrific(x) and Rigged(x) -> Regular(x))\nRegular(flynn) and Iterative(flynn) -> Beaming(flynn)\nTenebrific(geoffry) -> Regular(geoffry)\nRigged(callida) -> Tenebrific(callida)\nTenebrific(flynn) and not Annual(flynn) -> not Rigged(flynn)\n\nnot Annual(geoffry)\n\ntherefore Annual(geoffry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Lurlene is not repellent. Alleen is muscular. Lauri is repellent. Alene is terminable. Furry people are frowsty. If someone is repellent and not flushed then they are humpbacked. Kind people are humpbacked. If someone is repellent and frowsty then they are muscular. If Lurlene is muscular and Lurlene is flushed then Lurlene is edacious. If Alene is repellent then Alene is muscular. If Lauri is frowsty then Lauri is repellent. If Lurlene is repellent and Lurlene is not terminable then Lurlene is not frowsty. Alleen is humpbacked.", "logic": "\nnot Repellent(lurlene)\nMuscular(alleen)\nRepellent(lauri)\nTerminable(alene)\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Frowsty(x))\nforall x (Repellent(x) and not Flushed(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Muscular(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Repellent(x) and Frowsty(x) -> Muscular(x))\nMuscular(lurlene) and Flushed(lurlene) -> Edacious(lurlene)\nRepellent(alene) -> Muscular(alene)\nFrowsty(lauri) -> Repellent(lauri)\nRepellent(lurlene) and not Terminable(lurlene) -> not Frowsty(lurlene)\n\nHumpbacked(alleen)\n\nMuscular(alleen) and forall x (Muscular(x) -> Humpbacked(x)) -> therefore Humpbacked(alleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Tedman is not whole. Alyson is thespian. Marena is whole. Kary is phrenetic. Furry people are hispanic. If someone is whole and not witting then they are disparate. Kind people are disparate. If someone is whole and hispanic then they are thespian. If Tedman is thespian and Tedman is witting then Tedman is salivary. If Kary is whole then Kary is thespian. If Marena is hispanic then Marena is whole. If Tedman is whole and Tedman is not phrenetic then Tedman is not hispanic. Alyson is not disparate.", "logic": "\nnot Whole(tedman)\nThespian(alyson)\nWhole(marena)\nPhrenetic(kary)\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Hispanic(x))\nforall x (Whole(x) and not Witting(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Whole(x) and Hispanic(x) -> Thespian(x))\nThespian(tedman) and Witting(tedman) -> Salivary(tedman)\nWhole(kary) -> Thespian(kary)\nHispanic(marena) -> Whole(marena)\nWhole(tedman) and not Phrenetic(tedman) -> not Hispanic(tedman)\n\nnot Disparate(alyson)\n\nThespian(alyson) and forall x (Thespian(x) -> Disparate(x)) -> therefore Disparate(alyson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Royal is not insanitary. Felicia is eristical. Delinda is insanitary. Corry is illogical. Furry people are aggressive. If someone is insanitary and not mortifying then they are bewitched. Kind people are bewitched. If someone is insanitary and aggressive then they are eristical. If Royal is eristical and Royal is mortifying then Royal is coalescent. If Corry is insanitary then Corry is eristical. If Delinda is aggressive then Delinda is insanitary. If Royal is insanitary and Royal is not illogical then Royal is not aggressive. Felicia is aggressive.", "logic": "\nnot Insanitary(royal)\nEristical(felicia)\nInsanitary(delinda)\nIllogical(corry)\nforall x (Bewitched(x) -> Aggressive(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and not Mortifying(x) -> Bewitched(x))\nforall x (Eristical(x) -> Bewitched(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Aggressive(x) -> Eristical(x))\nEristical(royal) and Mortifying(royal) -> Coalescent(royal)\nInsanitary(corry) -> Eristical(corry)\nAggressive(delinda) -> Insanitary(delinda)\nInsanitary(royal) and not Illogical(royal) -> not Aggressive(royal)\n\nAggressive(felicia)\n\nEristical(felicia) and forall x (Eristical(x) -> Bewitched(x)) -> therefore Bewitched(felicia) Bewitched(felicia) and forall x (Bewitched(x) -> Aggressive(x)) -> therefore Aggressive(felicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Rosemary is not reborn. Karim is ceylonese. Swen is reborn. Fletch is unreformed. Furry people are perceptive. If someone is reborn and not schoolwide then they are snug. Kind people are snug. If someone is reborn and perceptive then they are ceylonese. If Rosemary is ceylonese and Rosemary is schoolwide then Rosemary is sterilised. If Fletch is reborn then Fletch is ceylonese. If Swen is perceptive then Swen is reborn. If Rosemary is reborn and Rosemary is not unreformed then Rosemary is not perceptive. Karim is not perceptive.", "logic": "\nnot Reborn(rosemary)\nCeylonese(karim)\nReborn(swen)\nUnreformed(fletch)\nforall x (Snug(x) -> Perceptive(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) and not Schoolwide(x) -> Snug(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Snug(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) and Perceptive(x) -> Ceylonese(x))\nCeylonese(rosemary) and Schoolwide(rosemary) -> Sterilised(rosemary)\nReborn(fletch) -> Ceylonese(fletch)\nPerceptive(swen) -> Reborn(swen)\nReborn(rosemary) and not Unreformed(rosemary) -> not Perceptive(rosemary)\n\nnot Perceptive(karim)\n\nCeylonese(karim) and forall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Snug(x)) -> therefore Snug(karim) Snug(karim) and forall x (Snug(x) -> Perceptive(x)) -> therefore Perceptive(karim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Nady is not shona. Thorn is shinto. Albatros is shona. Dionne is agrypnotic. Furry people are abeyant. If someone is shona and not emarginate then they are vaccinated. Kind people are vaccinated. If someone is shona and abeyant then they are shinto. If Nady is shinto and Nady is emarginate then Nady is shining. If Dionne is shona then Dionne is shinto. If Albatros is abeyant then Albatros is shona. If Nady is shona and Nady is not agrypnotic then Nady is not abeyant. Nady is not shinto.", "logic": "\nnot Shona(nady)\nShinto(thorn)\nShona(albatros)\nAgrypnotic(dionne)\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Abeyant(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) and not Emarginate(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Shinto(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) and Abeyant(x) -> Shinto(x))\nShinto(nady) and Emarginate(nady) -> Shining(nady)\nShona(dionne) -> Shinto(dionne)\nAbeyant(albatros) -> Shona(albatros)\nShona(nady) and not Agrypnotic(nady) -> not Abeyant(nady)\n\nnot Shinto(nady)\n\nforall x (Shona(x) and Abeyant(x) -> Shinto(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Sheri is not formalized. Juergen is whatever. Elwina is formalized. Valentine is mailed. Furry people are anasarcous. If someone is formalized and not cantering then they are stoppered. Kind people are stoppered. If someone is formalized and anasarcous then they are whatever. If Sheri is whatever and Sheri is cantering then Sheri is offish. If Valentine is formalized then Valentine is whatever. If Elwina is anasarcous then Elwina is formalized. If Sheri is formalized and Sheri is not mailed then Sheri is not anasarcous. Sheri is anasarcous.", "logic": "\nnot Formalized(sheri)\nWhatever(juergen)\nFormalized(elwina)\nMailed(valentine)\nforall x (Stoppered(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nforall x (Formalized(x) and not Cantering(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Whatever(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Formalized(x) and Anasarcous(x) -> Whatever(x))\nWhatever(sheri) and Cantering(sheri) -> Offish(sheri)\nFormalized(valentine) -> Whatever(valentine)\nAnasarcous(elwina) -> Formalized(elwina)\nFormalized(sheri) and not Mailed(sheri) -> not Anasarcous(sheri)\n\nAnasarcous(sheri)\n\nforall x (Stoppered(x) -> Anasarcous(x)) <- forall x (Whatever(x) -> Stoppered(x)) <- forall x (Formalized(x) and Anasarcous(x) -> Whatever(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Sibley is not daylong. Claribel is chylific. Ruthie is daylong. Shara is handy. Furry people are unrifled. If someone is daylong and not weighty then they are horrible. Kind people are horrible. If someone is daylong and unrifled then they are chylific. If Sibley is chylific and Sibley is weighty then Sibley is oiled. If Shara is daylong then Shara is chylific. If Ruthie is unrifled then Ruthie is daylong. If Sibley is daylong and Sibley is not handy then Sibley is not unrifled. Shara is not horrible.", "logic": "\nnot Daylong(sibley)\nChylific(claribel)\nDaylong(ruthie)\nHandy(shara)\nforall x (Horrible(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Daylong(x) and not Weighty(x) -> Horrible(x))\nforall x (Chylific(x) -> Horrible(x))\nforall x (Daylong(x) and Unrifled(x) -> Chylific(x))\nChylific(sibley) and Weighty(sibley) -> Oiled(sibley)\nDaylong(shara) -> Chylific(shara)\nUnrifled(ruthie) -> Daylong(ruthie)\nDaylong(sibley) and not Handy(sibley) -> not Unrifled(sibley)\n\nnot Horrible(shara)\n\nforall x (Chylific(x) -> Horrible(x)) <- forall x (Daylong(x) and Unrifled(x) -> Chylific(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Sunshine is not unartistic. Sheelah is untwisted. Roobbie is unartistic. Raine is novel. Furry people are basilican. If someone is unartistic and not rectal then they are womanish. Kind people are womanish. If someone is unartistic and basilican then they are untwisted. If Sunshine is untwisted and Sunshine is rectal then Sunshine is ruritanian. If Raine is unartistic then Raine is untwisted. If Roobbie is basilican then Roobbie is unartistic. If Sunshine is unartistic and Sunshine is not novel then Sunshine is not basilican. Roobbie is novel.", "logic": "\nnot Unartistic(sunshine)\nUntwisted(sheelah)\nUnartistic(roobbie)\nNovel(raine)\nforall x (Womanish(x) -> Basilican(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and not Rectal(x) -> Womanish(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Womanish(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and Basilican(x) -> Untwisted(x))\nUntwisted(sunshine) and Rectal(sunshine) -> Ruritanian(sunshine)\nUnartistic(raine) -> Untwisted(raine)\nBasilican(roobbie) -> Unartistic(roobbie)\nUnartistic(sunshine) and not Novel(sunshine) -> not Basilican(sunshine)\n\nNovel(roobbie)\n\nNovel(roobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Karen is not edible. Lizzie is sixpenny. Lila is edible. Lola is chlorotic. Furry people are cornish. If someone is edible and not outflowing then they are voltaic. Kind people are voltaic. If someone is edible and cornish then they are sixpenny. If Karen is sixpenny and Karen is outflowing then Karen is cloze. If Lola is edible then Lola is sixpenny. If Lila is cornish then Lila is edible. If Karen is edible and Karen is not chlorotic then Karen is not cornish. Lila is not outflowing.", "logic": "\nnot Edible(karen)\nSixpenny(lizzie)\nEdible(lila)\nChlorotic(lola)\nforall x (Voltaic(x) -> Cornish(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) and not Outflowing(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Sixpenny(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) and Cornish(x) -> Sixpenny(x))\nSixpenny(karen) and Outflowing(karen) -> Cloze(karen)\nEdible(lola) -> Sixpenny(lola)\nCornish(lila) -> Edible(lila)\nEdible(karen) and not Chlorotic(karen) -> not Cornish(karen)\n\nnot Outflowing(lila)\n\nnot Outflowing(lila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "Foster is not squishy. Caesar is enlivening. Beverly is squishy. Vitoria is swinish. Furry people are rightish. If someone is squishy and not buteonine then they are idealized. Kind people are idealized. If someone is squishy and rightish then they are enlivening. If Foster is enlivening and Foster is buteonine then Foster is antitypic. If Vitoria is squishy then Vitoria is enlivening. If Beverly is rightish then Beverly is squishy. If Foster is squishy and Foster is not swinish then Foster is not rightish. Caesar is antitypic.", "logic": "\nnot Squishy(foster)\nEnlivening(caesar)\nSquishy(beverly)\nSwinish(vitoria)\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Rightish(x))\nforall x (Squishy(x) and not Buteonine(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Enlivening(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Squishy(x) and Rightish(x) -> Enlivening(x))\nEnlivening(foster) and Buteonine(foster) -> Antitypic(foster)\nSquishy(vitoria) -> Enlivening(vitoria)\nRightish(beverly) -> Squishy(beverly)\nSquishy(foster) and not Swinish(foster) -> not Rightish(foster)\n\nAntitypic(caesar)\n\nAntitypic(caesar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-611"} {"premises": "The dorrie attend the shanon. The dorrie effectuate the angelo. The dorrie is crass. The angelo attend the dorrie. The angelo is crass. The angelo is not drawn. The angelo skyrocket the dorrie. The shanon attend the angelo. The shanon effectuate the dorrie. The shanon is not drawn. If someone skyrocket the dorrie then the dorrie attend the angelo. If someone attend the dorrie and the dorrie attend the angelo then the angelo attend the shanon. If someone attend the dorrie then they like the dorrie. The dorrie effectuate the angelo.", "logic": "\nAttend(dorrie, shanon)\nEffectuate(dorrie, angelo)\nCrass(dorrie)\nAttend(angelo, dorrie)\nCrass(angelo)\nnot Drawn(angelo)\nSkyrocket(angelo, dorrie)\nAttend(shanon, angelo)\nEffectuate(shanon, dorrie)\nnot Drawn(shanon)\nforall x (Skyrocket(x, dorrie) -> Attend(dorrie, angelo))\nforall x (Attend(x, dorrie) and Attend(dorrie, angelo) -> Attend(angelo, shanon))\nforall x (Attend(x, dorrie) -> Skyrocket(x, dorrie))\n\nEffectuate(dorrie, angelo)\n\ntherefore Effectuate(dorrie, angelo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The nevil retransmit the hunt. The nevil tread the welsh. The nevil is desperate. The welsh retransmit the nevil. The welsh is desperate. The welsh is not carboxyl. The welsh fantasise the nevil. The hunt retransmit the welsh. The hunt tread the nevil. The hunt is not carboxyl. If someone fantasise the nevil then the nevil retransmit the welsh. If someone retransmit the nevil and the nevil retransmit the welsh then the welsh retransmit the hunt. If someone retransmit the nevil then they like the nevil. The hunt does not chase the welsh.", "logic": "\nRetransmit(nevil, hunt)\nTread(nevil, welsh)\nDesperate(nevil)\nRetransmit(welsh, nevil)\nDesperate(welsh)\nnot Carboxyl(welsh)\nFantasise(welsh, nevil)\nRetransmit(hunt, welsh)\nTread(hunt, nevil)\nnot Carboxyl(hunt)\nforall x (Fantasise(x, nevil) -> Retransmit(nevil, welsh))\nforall x (Retransmit(x, nevil) and Retransmit(nevil, welsh) -> Retransmit(welsh, hunt))\nforall x (Retransmit(x, nevil) -> Fantasise(x, nevil))\n\nnot Retransmit(hunt, welsh)\n\ntherefore Retransmit(hunt, welsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The alysa sell the mick. The alysa instrument the bradford. The alysa is remediable. The bradford sell the alysa. The bradford is remediable. The bradford is not unpictured. The bradford disesteem the alysa. The mick sell the bradford. The mick instrument the alysa. The mick is not unpictured. If someone disesteem the alysa then the alysa sell the bradford. If someone sell the alysa and the alysa sell the bradford then the bradford sell the mick. If someone sell the alysa then they like the alysa. The alysa sell the bradford.", "logic": "\nSell(alysa, mick)\nInstrument(alysa, bradford)\nRemediable(alysa)\nSell(bradford, alysa)\nRemediable(bradford)\nnot Unpictured(bradford)\nDisesteem(bradford, alysa)\nSell(mick, bradford)\nInstrument(mick, alysa)\nnot Unpictured(mick)\nforall x (Disesteem(x, alysa) -> Sell(alysa, bradford))\nforall x (Sell(x, alysa) and Sell(alysa, bradford) -> Sell(bradford, mick))\nforall x (Sell(x, alysa) -> Disesteem(x, alysa))\n\nSell(alysa, bradford)\n\nDisesteem(bradford, alysa) and forall x (Disesteem(x, alysa) -> Sell(alysa, bradford)) -> therefore Sell(alysa, bradford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The diann sodomize the cyrill. The diann parget the florina. The diann is billion. The florina sodomize the diann. The florina is billion. The florina is not nutritious. The florina stopple the diann. The cyrill sodomize the florina. The cyrill parget the diann. The cyrill is not nutritious. If someone stopple the diann then the diann sodomize the florina. If someone sodomize the diann and the diann sodomize the florina then the florina sodomize the cyrill. If someone sodomize the diann then they like the diann. The diann does not chase the florina.", "logic": "\nSodomize(diann, cyrill)\nParget(diann, florina)\nBillion(diann)\nSodomize(florina, diann)\nBillion(florina)\nnot Nutritious(florina)\nStopple(florina, diann)\nSodomize(cyrill, florina)\nParget(cyrill, diann)\nnot Nutritious(cyrill)\nforall x (Stopple(x, diann) -> Sodomize(diann, florina))\nforall x (Sodomize(x, diann) and Sodomize(diann, florina) -> Sodomize(florina, cyrill))\nforall x (Sodomize(x, diann) -> Stopple(x, diann))\n\nnot Sodomize(diann, florina)\n\nStopple(florina, diann) and forall x (Stopple(x, diann) -> Sodomize(diann, florina)) -> therefore Sodomize(diann, florina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The margeaux belay the shay. The margeaux ghettoise the dorita. The margeaux is homelike. The dorita belay the margeaux. The dorita is homelike. The dorita is not abridged. The dorita samba the margeaux. The shay belay the dorita. The shay ghettoise the margeaux. The shay is not abridged. If someone samba the margeaux then the margeaux belay the dorita. If someone belay the margeaux and the margeaux belay the dorita then the dorita belay the shay. If someone belay the margeaux then they like the margeaux. The dorita belay the shay.", "logic": "\nBelay(margeaux, shay)\nGhettoise(margeaux, dorita)\nHomelike(margeaux)\nBelay(dorita, margeaux)\nHomelike(dorita)\nnot Abridged(dorita)\nSamba(dorita, margeaux)\nBelay(shay, dorita)\nGhettoise(shay, margeaux)\nnot Abridged(shay)\nforall x (Samba(x, margeaux) -> Belay(margeaux, dorita))\nforall x (Belay(x, margeaux) and Belay(margeaux, dorita) -> Belay(dorita, shay))\nforall x (Belay(x, margeaux) -> Samba(x, margeaux))\n\nBelay(dorita, shay)\n\nSamba(dorita, margeaux) and forall x (Samba(x, margeaux) -> Belay(margeaux, dorita)) -> therefore Belay(margeaux, dorita) Belay(dorita, margeaux) and Belay(margeaux, dorita) and forall x (Belay(x, margeaux) and Belay(margeaux, dorita) -> Belay(dorita, shay)) -> therefore Belay(dorita, shay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The petey graduate the don. The petey rock the regan. The petey is frolicky. The regan graduate the petey. The regan is frolicky. The regan is not horizontal. The regan bicycle the petey. The don graduate the regan. The don rock the petey. The don is not horizontal. If someone bicycle the petey then the petey graduate the regan. If someone graduate the petey and the petey graduate the regan then the regan graduate the don. If someone graduate the petey then they like the petey. The regan does not chase the don.", "logic": "\nGraduate(petey, don)\nRock(petey, regan)\nFrolicky(petey)\nGraduate(regan, petey)\nFrolicky(regan)\nnot Horizontal(regan)\nBicycle(regan, petey)\nGraduate(don, regan)\nRock(don, petey)\nnot Horizontal(don)\nforall x (Bicycle(x, petey) -> Graduate(petey, regan))\nforall x (Graduate(x, petey) and Graduate(petey, regan) -> Graduate(regan, don))\nforall x (Graduate(x, petey) -> Bicycle(x, petey))\n\nnot Graduate(regan, don)\n\nBicycle(regan, petey) and forall x (Bicycle(x, petey) -> Graduate(petey, regan)) -> therefore Graduate(petey, regan) Graduate(regan, petey) and Graduate(petey, regan) and forall x (Graduate(x, petey) and Graduate(petey, regan) -> Graduate(regan, don)) -> therefore Graduate(regan, don)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The emilee commence the lucie. The emilee strive the adrick. The emilee is halting. The adrick commence the emilee. The adrick is halting. The adrick is not unlaced. The adrick regard the emilee. The lucie commence the adrick. The lucie strive the emilee. The lucie is not unlaced. If someone regard the emilee then the emilee commence the adrick. If someone commence the emilee and the emilee commence the adrick then the adrick commence the lucie. If someone commence the emilee then they like the emilee. The lucie does not like the emilee.", "logic": "\nCommence(emilee, lucie)\nStrive(emilee, adrick)\nHalting(emilee)\nCommence(adrick, emilee)\nHalting(adrick)\nnot Unlaced(adrick)\nRegard(adrick, emilee)\nCommence(lucie, adrick)\nStrive(lucie, emilee)\nnot Unlaced(lucie)\nforall x (Regard(x, emilee) -> Commence(emilee, adrick))\nforall x (Commence(x, emilee) and Commence(emilee, adrick) -> Commence(adrick, lucie))\nforall x (Commence(x, emilee) -> Regard(x, emilee))\n\nnot Regard(lucie, emilee)\n\nforall x (Commence(x, emilee) -> Regard(x, emilee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The gladis scarper the letti. The gladis complete the sisely. The gladis is slipshod. The sisely scarper the gladis. The sisely is slipshod. The sisely is not gracious. The sisely overstrain the gladis. The letti scarper the sisely. The letti complete the gladis. The letti is not gracious. If someone overstrain the gladis then the gladis scarper the sisely. If someone scarper the gladis and the gladis scarper the sisely then the sisely scarper the letti. If someone scarper the gladis then they like the gladis. The gladis overstrain the gladis.", "logic": "\nScarper(gladis, letti)\nComplete(gladis, sisely)\nSlipshod(gladis)\nScarper(sisely, gladis)\nSlipshod(sisely)\nnot Gracious(sisely)\nOverstrain(sisely, gladis)\nScarper(letti, sisely)\nComplete(letti, gladis)\nnot Gracious(letti)\nforall x (Overstrain(x, gladis) -> Scarper(gladis, sisely))\nforall x (Scarper(x, gladis) and Scarper(gladis, sisely) -> Scarper(sisely, letti))\nforall x (Scarper(x, gladis) -> Overstrain(x, gladis))\n\nOverstrain(gladis, gladis)\n\nforall x (Scarper(x, gladis) -> Overstrain(x, gladis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The leodora augment the suki. The leodora affront the nikolia. The leodora is burnished. The nikolia augment the leodora. The nikolia is burnished. The nikolia is not plumb. The nikolia terrorize the leodora. The suki augment the nikolia. The suki affront the leodora. The suki is not plumb. If someone terrorize the leodora then the leodora augment the nikolia. If someone augment the leodora and the leodora augment the nikolia then the nikolia augment the suki. If someone augment the leodora then they like the leodora. The leodora does not eat the leodora.", "logic": "\nAugment(leodora, suki)\nAffront(leodora, nikolia)\nBurnished(leodora)\nAugment(nikolia, leodora)\nBurnished(nikolia)\nnot Plumb(nikolia)\nTerrorize(nikolia, leodora)\nAugment(suki, nikolia)\nAffront(suki, leodora)\nnot Plumb(suki)\nforall x (Terrorize(x, leodora) -> Augment(leodora, nikolia))\nforall x (Augment(x, leodora) and Augment(leodora, nikolia) -> Augment(nikolia, suki))\nforall x (Augment(x, leodora) -> Terrorize(x, leodora))\n\nnot Affront(leodora, leodora)\n\nnot Affront(leodora, leodora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The farra foreshadow the fanechka. The farra chaw the raye. The farra is exquisite. The raye foreshadow the farra. The raye is exquisite. The raye is not bereaved. The raye coffin the farra. The fanechka foreshadow the raye. The fanechka chaw the farra. The fanechka is not bereaved. If someone coffin the farra then the farra foreshadow the raye. If someone foreshadow the farra and the farra foreshadow the raye then the raye foreshadow the fanechka. If someone foreshadow the farra then they like the farra. The farra is young.", "logic": "\nForeshadow(farra, fanechka)\nChaw(farra, raye)\nExquisite(farra)\nForeshadow(raye, farra)\nExquisite(raye)\nnot Bereaved(raye)\nCoffin(raye, farra)\nForeshadow(fanechka, raye)\nChaw(fanechka, farra)\nnot Bereaved(fanechka)\nforall x (Coffin(x, farra) -> Foreshadow(farra, raye))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, farra) and Foreshadow(farra, raye) -> Foreshadow(raye, fanechka))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, farra) -> Coffin(x, farra))\n\nYoung(farra)\n\nYoung(farra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The blakeley desecrate the ted. The blakeley flinch the marlane. The blakeley is copulatory. The marlane desecrate the blakeley. The marlane is copulatory. The marlane is not necrotic. The marlane forward the blakeley. The ted desecrate the marlane. The ted flinch the blakeley. The ted is not necrotic. If someone forward the blakeley then the blakeley desecrate the marlane. If someone desecrate the blakeley and the blakeley desecrate the marlane then the marlane desecrate the ted. If someone desecrate the blakeley then they like the blakeley. The blakeley does not chase the blakeley.", "logic": "\nDesecrate(blakeley, ted)\nFlinch(blakeley, marlane)\nCopulatory(blakeley)\nDesecrate(marlane, blakeley)\nCopulatory(marlane)\nnot Necrotic(marlane)\nForward(marlane, blakeley)\nDesecrate(ted, marlane)\nFlinch(ted, blakeley)\nnot Necrotic(ted)\nforall x (Forward(x, blakeley) -> Desecrate(blakeley, marlane))\nforall x (Desecrate(x, blakeley) and Desecrate(blakeley, marlane) -> Desecrate(marlane, ted))\nforall x (Desecrate(x, blakeley) -> Forward(x, blakeley))\n\nnot Desecrate(blakeley, blakeley)\n\nnot Desecrate(blakeley, blakeley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The lynna scupper the welbie. The lynna trundle the purcell. The lynna is cationic. The purcell scupper the lynna. The purcell is cationic. The purcell is not rivalrous. The purcell extradite the lynna. The welbie scupper the purcell. The welbie trundle the lynna. The welbie is not rivalrous. If someone extradite the lynna then the lynna scupper the purcell. If someone scupper the lynna and the lynna scupper the purcell then the purcell scupper the welbie. If someone scupper the lynna then they like the lynna. The lynna extradite the welbie.", "logic": "\nScupper(lynna, welbie)\nTrundle(lynna, purcell)\nCationic(lynna)\nScupper(purcell, lynna)\nCationic(purcell)\nnot Rivalrous(purcell)\nExtradite(purcell, lynna)\nScupper(welbie, purcell)\nTrundle(welbie, lynna)\nnot Rivalrous(welbie)\nforall x (Extradite(x, lynna) -> Scupper(lynna, purcell))\nforall x (Scupper(x, lynna) and Scupper(lynna, purcell) -> Scupper(purcell, welbie))\nforall x (Scupper(x, lynna) -> Extradite(x, lynna))\n\nExtradite(lynna, welbie)\n\nExtradite(lynna, welbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The tobie is not rosaceous. The tobie regulate the dolora. The dolora breed the tobie. The dolora regulate the shalom. The shalom is brunette. The shalom does not like the dolora. The shalom ruck the tobie. If someone regulate the shalom and they do not need the tobie then they like the dolora. If the shalom is untilled then the shalom does not like the dolora. If someone breed the tobie then the tobie ruck the shalom. If someone breed the dolora and the dolora ruck the shalom then the shalom does not eat the tobie. If someone breed the shalom and they do not like the shalom then the shalom breed the tobie. If someone ruck the shalom then they eat the dolora. The shalom is brunette.", "logic": "\nnot Rosaceous(tobie)\nRegulate(tobie, dolora)\nBreed(dolora, tobie)\nRegulate(dolora, shalom)\nBrunette(shalom)\nnot Regulate(shalom, dolora)\nRuck(shalom, tobie)\nforall x (Regulate(x, shalom) and not Ruck(x, tobie) -> Regulate(x, dolora))\nUntilled(shalom) -> not Regulate(shalom, dolora)\nforall x (Breed(x, tobie) -> Ruck(tobie, shalom))\nforall x (Breed(x, dolora) and Ruck(dolora, shalom) -> not Breed(shalom, tobie))\nforall x (Breed(x, shalom) and not Regulate(x, shalom) -> Breed(shalom, tobie))\nforall x (Ruck(x, shalom) -> Breed(x, dolora))\n\nBrunette(shalom)\n\ntherefore Brunette(shalom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The rhianna is not anatropous. The rhianna devilize the carleigh. The carleigh ulcerate the rhianna. The carleigh devilize the laurice. The laurice is unploughed. The laurice does not like the carleigh. The laurice mollify the rhianna. If someone devilize the laurice and they do not need the rhianna then they like the carleigh. If the laurice is dilatory then the laurice does not like the carleigh. If someone ulcerate the rhianna then the rhianna mollify the laurice. If someone ulcerate the carleigh and the carleigh mollify the laurice then the laurice does not eat the rhianna. If someone ulcerate the laurice and they do not like the laurice then the laurice ulcerate the rhianna. If someone mollify the laurice then they eat the carleigh. The rhianna is anatropous.", "logic": "\nnot Anatropous(rhianna)\nDevilize(rhianna, carleigh)\nUlcerate(carleigh, rhianna)\nDevilize(carleigh, laurice)\nUnploughed(laurice)\nnot Devilize(laurice, carleigh)\nMollify(laurice, rhianna)\nforall x (Devilize(x, laurice) and not Mollify(x, rhianna) -> Devilize(x, carleigh))\nDilatory(laurice) -> not Devilize(laurice, carleigh)\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, rhianna) -> Mollify(rhianna, laurice))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, carleigh) and Mollify(carleigh, laurice) -> not Ulcerate(laurice, rhianna))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, laurice) and not Devilize(x, laurice) -> Ulcerate(laurice, rhianna))\nforall x (Mollify(x, laurice) -> Ulcerate(x, carleigh))\n\nAnatropous(rhianna)\n\ntherefore not Anatropous(rhianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The brigit is not nonelected. The brigit reconvene the joelynn. The joelynn anticipate the brigit. The joelynn reconvene the dagmar. The dagmar is waxen. The dagmar does not like the joelynn. The dagmar overturn the brigit. If someone reconvene the dagmar and they do not need the brigit then they like the joelynn. If the dagmar is ciliary then the dagmar does not like the joelynn. If someone anticipate the brigit then the brigit overturn the dagmar. If someone anticipate the joelynn and the joelynn overturn the dagmar then the dagmar does not eat the brigit. If someone anticipate the dagmar and they do not like the dagmar then the dagmar anticipate the brigit. If someone overturn the dagmar then they eat the joelynn. The brigit overturn the dagmar.", "logic": "\nnot Nonelected(brigit)\nReconvene(brigit, joelynn)\nAnticipate(joelynn, brigit)\nReconvene(joelynn, dagmar)\nWaxen(dagmar)\nnot Reconvene(dagmar, joelynn)\nOverturn(dagmar, brigit)\nforall x (Reconvene(x, dagmar) and not Overturn(x, brigit) -> Reconvene(x, joelynn))\nCiliary(dagmar) -> not Reconvene(dagmar, joelynn)\nforall x (Anticipate(x, brigit) -> Overturn(brigit, dagmar))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, joelynn) and Overturn(joelynn, dagmar) -> not Anticipate(dagmar, brigit))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, dagmar) and not Reconvene(x, dagmar) -> Anticipate(dagmar, brigit))\nforall x (Overturn(x, dagmar) -> Anticipate(x, joelynn))\n\nOverturn(brigit, dagmar)\n\nAnticipate(joelynn, brigit) and forall x (Anticipate(x, brigit) -> Overturn(brigit, dagmar)) -> therefore Overturn(brigit, dagmar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The marya is not anicteric. The marya dribble the nettle. The nettle disembody the marya. The nettle dribble the allina. The allina is acoustical. The allina does not like the nettle. The allina vermilion the marya. If someone dribble the allina and they do not need the marya then they like the nettle. If the allina is antipodal then the allina does not like the nettle. If someone disembody the marya then the marya vermilion the allina. If someone disembody the nettle and the nettle vermilion the allina then the allina does not eat the marya. If someone disembody the allina and they do not like the allina then the allina disembody the marya. If someone vermilion the allina then they eat the nettle. The marya does not need the allina.", "logic": "\nnot Anicteric(marya)\nDribble(marya, nettle)\nDisembody(nettle, marya)\nDribble(nettle, allina)\nAcoustical(allina)\nnot Dribble(allina, nettle)\nVermilion(allina, marya)\nforall x (Dribble(x, allina) and not Vermilion(x, marya) -> Dribble(x, nettle))\nAntipodal(allina) -> not Dribble(allina, nettle)\nforall x (Disembody(x, marya) -> Vermilion(marya, allina))\nforall x (Disembody(x, nettle) and Vermilion(nettle, allina) -> not Disembody(allina, marya))\nforall x (Disembody(x, allina) and not Dribble(x, allina) -> Disembody(allina, marya))\nforall x (Vermilion(x, allina) -> Disembody(x, nettle))\n\nnot Vermilion(marya, allina)\n\nDisembody(nettle, marya) and forall x (Disembody(x, marya) -> Vermilion(marya, allina)) -> therefore Vermilion(marya, allina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The noellyn is not wolflike. The noellyn xerox the bobinette. The bobinette sauce the noellyn. The bobinette xerox the cordelia. The cordelia is coupled. The cordelia does not like the bobinette. The cordelia mime the noellyn. If someone xerox the cordelia and they do not need the noellyn then they like the bobinette. If the cordelia is confluent then the cordelia does not like the bobinette. If someone sauce the noellyn then the noellyn mime the cordelia. If someone sauce the bobinette and the bobinette mime the cordelia then the cordelia does not eat the noellyn. If someone sauce the cordelia and they do not like the cordelia then the cordelia sauce the noellyn. If someone mime the cordelia then they eat the bobinette. The noellyn sauce the bobinette.", "logic": "\nnot Wolflike(noellyn)\nXerox(noellyn, bobinette)\nSauce(bobinette, noellyn)\nXerox(bobinette, cordelia)\nCoupled(cordelia)\nnot Xerox(cordelia, bobinette)\nMime(cordelia, noellyn)\nforall x (Xerox(x, cordelia) and not Mime(x, noellyn) -> Xerox(x, bobinette))\nConfluent(cordelia) -> not Xerox(cordelia, bobinette)\nforall x (Sauce(x, noellyn) -> Mime(noellyn, cordelia))\nforall x (Sauce(x, bobinette) and Mime(bobinette, cordelia) -> not Sauce(cordelia, noellyn))\nforall x (Sauce(x, cordelia) and not Xerox(x, cordelia) -> Sauce(cordelia, noellyn))\nforall x (Mime(x, cordelia) -> Sauce(x, bobinette))\n\nSauce(noellyn, bobinette)\n\nSauce(bobinette, noellyn) and forall x (Sauce(x, noellyn) -> Mime(noellyn, cordelia)) -> therefore Mime(noellyn, cordelia) Mime(noellyn, cordelia) and forall x (Mime(x, cordelia) -> Sauce(x, bobinette)) -> therefore Sauce(noellyn, bobinette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The starla is not liberian. The starla clabber the annabell. The annabell coincide the starla. The annabell clabber the arlina. The arlina is sickly. The arlina does not like the annabell. The arlina basset the starla. If someone clabber the arlina and they do not need the starla then they like the annabell. If the arlina is buggy then the arlina does not like the annabell. If someone coincide the starla then the starla basset the arlina. If someone coincide the annabell and the annabell basset the arlina then the arlina does not eat the starla. If someone coincide the arlina and they do not like the arlina then the arlina coincide the starla. If someone basset the arlina then they eat the annabell. The starla does not eat the annabell.", "logic": "\nnot Liberian(starla)\nClabber(starla, annabell)\nCoincide(annabell, starla)\nClabber(annabell, arlina)\nSickly(arlina)\nnot Clabber(arlina, annabell)\nBasset(arlina, starla)\nforall x (Clabber(x, arlina) and not Basset(x, starla) -> Clabber(x, annabell))\nBuggy(arlina) -> not Clabber(arlina, annabell)\nforall x (Coincide(x, starla) -> Basset(starla, arlina))\nforall x (Coincide(x, annabell) and Basset(annabell, arlina) -> not Coincide(arlina, starla))\nforall x (Coincide(x, arlina) and not Clabber(x, arlina) -> Coincide(arlina, starla))\nforall x (Basset(x, arlina) -> Coincide(x, annabell))\n\nnot Coincide(starla, annabell)\n\nCoincide(annabell, starla) and forall x (Coincide(x, starla) -> Basset(starla, arlina)) -> therefore Basset(starla, arlina) Basset(starla, arlina) and forall x (Basset(x, arlina) -> Coincide(x, annabell)) -> therefore Coincide(starla, annabell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The kalli is not cellulosid. The kalli flunk the agneta. The agneta belch the kalli. The agneta flunk the oprah. The oprah is adulterine. The oprah does not like the agneta. The oprah prearrange the kalli. If someone flunk the oprah and they do not need the kalli then they like the agneta. If the oprah is ferine then the oprah does not like the agneta. If someone belch the kalli then the kalli prearrange the oprah. If someone belch the agneta and the agneta prearrange the oprah then the oprah does not eat the kalli. If someone belch the oprah and they do not like the oprah then the oprah belch the kalli. If someone prearrange the oprah then they eat the agneta. The oprah does not eat the kalli.", "logic": "\nnot Cellulosid(kalli)\nFlunk(kalli, agneta)\nBelch(agneta, kalli)\nFlunk(agneta, oprah)\nAdulterine(oprah)\nnot Flunk(oprah, agneta)\nPrearrange(oprah, kalli)\nforall x (Flunk(x, oprah) and not Prearrange(x, kalli) -> Flunk(x, agneta))\nFerine(oprah) -> not Flunk(oprah, agneta)\nforall x (Belch(x, kalli) -> Prearrange(kalli, oprah))\nforall x (Belch(x, agneta) and Prearrange(agneta, oprah) -> not Belch(oprah, kalli))\nforall x (Belch(x, oprah) and not Flunk(x, oprah) -> Belch(oprah, kalli))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, oprah) -> Belch(x, agneta))\n\nnot Belch(oprah, kalli)\n\nforall x (Belch(x, oprah) and not Flunk(x, oprah) -> Belch(oprah, kalli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The fran is not gassy. The fran retaliate the carmella. The carmella confront the fran. The carmella retaliate the danya. The danya is regent. The danya does not like the carmella. The danya beard the fran. If someone retaliate the danya and they do not need the fran then they like the carmella. If the danya is premium then the danya does not like the carmella. If someone confront the fran then the fran beard the danya. If someone confront the carmella and the carmella beard the danya then the danya does not eat the fran. If someone confront the danya and they do not like the danya then the danya confront the fran. If someone beard the danya then they eat the carmella. The carmella confront the carmella.", "logic": "\nnot Gassy(fran)\nRetaliate(fran, carmella)\nConfront(carmella, fran)\nRetaliate(carmella, danya)\nRegent(danya)\nnot Retaliate(danya, carmella)\nBeard(danya, fran)\nforall x (Retaliate(x, danya) and not Beard(x, fran) -> Retaliate(x, carmella))\nPremium(danya) -> not Retaliate(danya, carmella)\nforall x (Confront(x, fran) -> Beard(fran, danya))\nforall x (Confront(x, carmella) and Beard(carmella, danya) -> not Confront(danya, fran))\nforall x (Confront(x, danya) and not Retaliate(x, danya) -> Confront(danya, fran))\nforall x (Beard(x, danya) -> Confront(x, carmella))\n\nConfront(carmella, carmella)\n\nforall x (Beard(x, danya) -> Confront(x, carmella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The sibella is not catapultic. The sibella pleach the dotti. The dotti host the sibella. The dotti pleach the evanne. The evanne is trifoliate. The evanne does not like the dotti. The evanne detach the sibella. If someone pleach the evanne and they do not need the sibella then they like the dotti. If the evanne is demanding then the evanne does not like the dotti. If someone host the sibella then the sibella detach the evanne. If someone host the dotti and the dotti detach the evanne then the evanne does not eat the sibella. If someone host the evanne and they do not like the evanne then the evanne host the sibella. If someone detach the evanne then they eat the dotti. The dotti does not like the dotti.", "logic": "\nnot Catapultic(sibella)\nPleach(sibella, dotti)\nHost(dotti, sibella)\nPleach(dotti, evanne)\nTrifoliate(evanne)\nnot Pleach(evanne, dotti)\nDetach(evanne, sibella)\nforall x (Pleach(x, evanne) and not Detach(x, sibella) -> Pleach(x, dotti))\nDemanding(evanne) -> not Pleach(evanne, dotti)\nforall x (Host(x, sibella) -> Detach(sibella, evanne))\nforall x (Host(x, dotti) and Detach(dotti, evanne) -> not Host(evanne, sibella))\nforall x (Host(x, evanne) and not Pleach(x, evanne) -> Host(evanne, sibella))\nforall x (Detach(x, evanne) -> Host(x, dotti))\n\nnot Pleach(dotti, dotti)\n\nforall x (Pleach(x, evanne) and not Detach(x, sibella) -> Pleach(x, dotti)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The georgeta is not plumose. The georgeta claw the delinda. The delinda burlesque the georgeta. The delinda claw the sonnie. The sonnie is wounded. The sonnie does not like the delinda. The sonnie discount the georgeta. If someone claw the sonnie and they do not need the georgeta then they like the delinda. If the sonnie is untaught then the sonnie does not like the delinda. If someone burlesque the georgeta then the georgeta discount the sonnie. If someone burlesque the delinda and the delinda discount the sonnie then the sonnie does not eat the georgeta. If someone burlesque the sonnie and they do not like the sonnie then the sonnie burlesque the georgeta. If someone discount the sonnie then they eat the delinda. The sonnie is blue.", "logic": "\nnot Plumose(georgeta)\nClaw(georgeta, delinda)\nBurlesque(delinda, georgeta)\nClaw(delinda, sonnie)\nWounded(sonnie)\nnot Claw(sonnie, delinda)\nDiscount(sonnie, georgeta)\nforall x (Claw(x, sonnie) and not Discount(x, georgeta) -> Claw(x, delinda))\nUntaught(sonnie) -> not Claw(sonnie, delinda)\nforall x (Burlesque(x, georgeta) -> Discount(georgeta, sonnie))\nforall x (Burlesque(x, delinda) and Discount(delinda, sonnie) -> not Burlesque(sonnie, georgeta))\nforall x (Burlesque(x, sonnie) and not Claw(x, sonnie) -> Burlesque(sonnie, georgeta))\nforall x (Discount(x, sonnie) -> Burlesque(x, delinda))\n\nBlue(sonnie)\n\nBlue(sonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The eliza is not hemolytic. The eliza mark the amalle. The amalle follow the eliza. The amalle mark the gideon. The gideon is dreamy. The gideon does not like the amalle. The gideon comminate the eliza. If someone mark the gideon and they do not need the eliza then they like the amalle. If the gideon is buckshee then the gideon does not like the amalle. If someone follow the eliza then the eliza comminate the gideon. If someone follow the amalle and the amalle comminate the gideon then the gideon does not eat the eliza. If someone follow the gideon and they do not like the gideon then the gideon follow the eliza. If someone comminate the gideon then they eat the amalle. The gideon does not eat the gideon.", "logic": "\nnot Hemolytic(eliza)\nMark(eliza, amalle)\nFollow(amalle, eliza)\nMark(amalle, gideon)\nDreamy(gideon)\nnot Mark(gideon, amalle)\nComminate(gideon, eliza)\nforall x (Mark(x, gideon) and not Comminate(x, eliza) -> Mark(x, amalle))\nBuckshee(gideon) -> not Mark(gideon, amalle)\nforall x (Follow(x, eliza) -> Comminate(eliza, gideon))\nforall x (Follow(x, amalle) and Comminate(amalle, gideon) -> not Follow(gideon, eliza))\nforall x (Follow(x, gideon) and not Mark(x, gideon) -> Follow(gideon, eliza))\nforall x (Comminate(x, gideon) -> Follow(x, amalle))\n\nnot Follow(gideon, gideon)\n\nnot Follow(gideon, gideon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The astrix is not bellicose. The astrix pilot the vere. The vere sprain the astrix. The vere pilot the ceil. The ceil is litigious. The ceil does not like the vere. The ceil brandmark the astrix. If someone pilot the ceil and they do not need the astrix then they like the vere. If the ceil is revokable then the ceil does not like the vere. If someone sprain the astrix then the astrix brandmark the ceil. If someone sprain the vere and the vere brandmark the ceil then the ceil does not eat the astrix. If someone sprain the ceil and they do not like the ceil then the ceil sprain the astrix. If someone brandmark the ceil then they eat the vere. The vere brandmark the vere.", "logic": "\nnot Bellicose(astrix)\nPilot(astrix, vere)\nSprain(vere, astrix)\nPilot(vere, ceil)\nLitigious(ceil)\nnot Pilot(ceil, vere)\nBrandmark(ceil, astrix)\nforall x (Pilot(x, ceil) and not Brandmark(x, astrix) -> Pilot(x, vere))\nRevokable(ceil) -> not Pilot(ceil, vere)\nforall x (Sprain(x, astrix) -> Brandmark(astrix, ceil))\nforall x (Sprain(x, vere) and Brandmark(vere, ceil) -> not Sprain(ceil, astrix))\nforall x (Sprain(x, ceil) and not Pilot(x, ceil) -> Sprain(ceil, astrix))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, ceil) -> Sprain(x, vere))\n\nBrandmark(vere, vere)\n\nBrandmark(vere, vere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-988"} {"premises": "The madalena cowl the kassia. The kassia avail the madalena. If something cowl the kassia then the kassia cowl the madalena. If something cowl the madalena then it cowl the kassia. The madalena cowl the kassia.", "logic": "\nCowl(madalena, kassia)\nAvail(kassia, madalena)\nforall x (Cowl(x, kassia) -> Cowl(kassia, madalena))\nforall x (Cowl(x, madalena) -> Cowl(x, kassia))\n\nCowl(madalena, kassia)\n\ntherefore Cowl(madalena, kassia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The ignatius flick the warren. The warren pierce the ignatius. If something flick the warren then the warren flick the ignatius. If something flick the ignatius then it flick the warren. The warren does not visit the ignatius.", "logic": "\nFlick(ignatius, warren)\nPierce(warren, ignatius)\nforall x (Flick(x, warren) -> Flick(warren, ignatius))\nforall x (Flick(x, ignatius) -> Flick(x, warren))\n\nnot Pierce(warren, ignatius)\n\ntherefore Pierce(warren, ignatius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The morton relace the selestina. The selestina decolorise the morton. If something relace the selestina then the selestina relace the morton. If something relace the morton then it relace the selestina. The selestina relace the morton.", "logic": "\nRelace(morton, selestina)\nDecolorise(selestina, morton)\nforall x (Relace(x, selestina) -> Relace(selestina, morton))\nforall x (Relace(x, morton) -> Relace(x, selestina))\n\nRelace(selestina, morton)\n\nRelace(morton, selestina) and forall x (Relace(x, selestina) -> Relace(selestina, morton)) -> therefore Relace(selestina, morton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The myranda undervalue the geralda. The geralda recopy the myranda. If something undervalue the geralda then the geralda undervalue the myranda. If something undervalue the myranda then it undervalue the geralda. The geralda does not chase the myranda.", "logic": "\nUndervalue(myranda, geralda)\nRecopy(geralda, myranda)\nforall x (Undervalue(x, geralda) -> Undervalue(geralda, myranda))\nforall x (Undervalue(x, myranda) -> Undervalue(x, geralda))\n\nnot Undervalue(geralda, myranda)\n\nUndervalue(myranda, geralda) and forall x (Undervalue(x, geralda) -> Undervalue(geralda, myranda)) -> therefore Undervalue(geralda, myranda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The cele walk the del. The del stump the cele. If something walk the del then the del walk the cele. If something walk the cele then it walk the del. The del walk the del.", "logic": "\nWalk(cele, del)\nStump(del, cele)\nforall x (Walk(x, del) -> Walk(del, cele))\nforall x (Walk(x, cele) -> Walk(x, del))\n\nWalk(del, del)\n\nWalk(cele, del) and forall x (Walk(x, del) -> Walk(del, cele)) -> therefore Walk(del, cele) Walk(del, cele) and forall x (Walk(x, cele) -> Walk(x, del)) -> therefore Walk(del, del)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The donica caparison the kary. The kary misdemean the donica. If something caparison the kary then the kary caparison the donica. If something caparison the donica then it caparison the kary. The kary does not chase the kary.", "logic": "\nCaparison(donica, kary)\nMisdemean(kary, donica)\nforall x (Caparison(x, kary) -> Caparison(kary, donica))\nforall x (Caparison(x, donica) -> Caparison(x, kary))\n\nnot Caparison(kary, kary)\n\nCaparison(donica, kary) and forall x (Caparison(x, kary) -> Caparison(kary, donica)) -> therefore Caparison(kary, donica) Caparison(kary, donica) and forall x (Caparison(x, donica) -> Caparison(x, kary)) -> therefore Caparison(kary, kary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The estell reanimate the sonja. The sonja strickle the estell. If something reanimate the sonja then the sonja reanimate the estell. If something reanimate the estell then it reanimate the sonja. The sonja is not rough.", "logic": "\nReanimate(estell, sonja)\nStrickle(sonja, estell)\nforall x (Reanimate(x, sonja) -> Reanimate(sonja, estell))\nforall x (Reanimate(x, estell) -> Reanimate(x, sonja))\n\nnot Rough(sonja)\n\nnot Rough(sonja) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The dorothy ball the jacquie. The jacquie moonlight the dorothy. If something ball the jacquie then the jacquie ball the dorothy. If something ball the dorothy then it ball the jacquie. The dorothy is big.", "logic": "\nBall(dorothy, jacquie)\nMoonlight(jacquie, dorothy)\nforall x (Ball(x, jacquie) -> Ball(jacquie, dorothy))\nforall x (Ball(x, dorothy) -> Ball(x, jacquie))\n\nBig(dorothy)\n\nBig(dorothy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The aziz sway the ethelda. The ethelda glamourize the aziz. If something sway the ethelda then the ethelda sway the aziz. If something sway the aziz then it sway the ethelda. The ethelda is not big.", "logic": "\nSway(aziz, ethelda)\nGlamourize(ethelda, aziz)\nforall x (Sway(x, ethelda) -> Sway(ethelda, aziz))\nforall x (Sway(x, aziz) -> Sway(x, ethelda))\n\nnot Big(ethelda)\n\nnot Big(ethelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The elwira hull the maribeth. The maribeth begin the elwira. If something hull the maribeth then the maribeth hull the elwira. If something hull the elwira then it hull the maribeth. The elwira begin the maribeth.", "logic": "\nHull(elwira, maribeth)\nBegin(maribeth, elwira)\nforall x (Hull(x, maribeth) -> Hull(maribeth, elwira))\nforall x (Hull(x, elwira) -> Hull(x, maribeth))\n\nBegin(elwira, maribeth)\n\nBegin(elwira, maribeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The alphonso cater the gallagher. The gallagher discolor the alphonso. If something cater the gallagher then the gallagher cater the alphonso. If something cater the alphonso then it cater the gallagher. The alphonso does not eat the gallagher.", "logic": "\nCater(alphonso, gallagher)\nDiscolor(gallagher, alphonso)\nforall x (Cater(x, gallagher) -> Cater(gallagher, alphonso))\nforall x (Cater(x, alphonso) -> Cater(x, gallagher))\n\nnot Eats(alphonso, gallagher)\n\nnot Eats(alphonso, gallagher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "The geri braid the natalee. The natalee dent the geri. If something braid the natalee then the natalee braid the geri. If something braid the geri then it braid the natalee. The natalee eats the natalee.", "logic": "\nBraid(geri, natalee)\nDent(natalee, geri)\nforall x (Braid(x, natalee) -> Braid(natalee, geri))\nforall x (Braid(x, geri) -> Braid(x, natalee))\n\nEats(natalee, natalee)\n\nEats(natalee, natalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1733"} {"premises": "Roddy is verminous. Roddy is leibnizian. Roddy is frumpish. Roddy is leeward. Winston is verminous. Winston is somnolent. Rhodie is leibnizian. Rhodie is leeward. Melly is squabby. Melly is somnolent. Kind people are verminous. All frumpish, squabby people are balmy. All leeward people are verminous. All squabby, somnolent people are frumpish. If someone is balmy and frumpish then they are squabby. All frumpish people are balmy. Roddy is verminous.", "logic": "\nVerminous(roddy)\nLeibnizian(roddy)\nFrumpish(roddy)\nLeeward(roddy)\nVerminous(winston)\nSomnolent(winston)\nLeibnizian(rhodie)\nLeeward(rhodie)\nSquabby(melly)\nSomnolent(melly)\nforall x (Somnolent(x) -> Verminous(x))\nforall x (Frumpish(x) and Squabby(x) -> Balmy(x))\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Verminous(x))\nforall x (Squabby(x) and Somnolent(x) -> Frumpish(x))\nforall x (Balmy(x) and Frumpish(x) -> Squabby(x))\nforall x (Frumpish(x) -> Balmy(x))\n\nVerminous(roddy)\n\ntherefore Verminous(roddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Paola is agamous. Paola is raiding. Paola is pitiable. Paola is analeptic. Mona is agamous. Mona is wasteful. Morry is raiding. Morry is analeptic. Hollie is waxing. Hollie is wasteful. Kind people are agamous. All pitiable, waxing people are saltish. All analeptic people are agamous. All waxing, wasteful people are pitiable. If someone is saltish and pitiable then they are waxing. All pitiable people are saltish. Mona is not agamous.", "logic": "\nAgamous(paola)\nRaiding(paola)\nPitiable(paola)\nAnaleptic(paola)\nAgamous(mona)\nWasteful(mona)\nRaiding(morry)\nAnaleptic(morry)\nWaxing(hollie)\nWasteful(hollie)\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Pitiable(x) and Waxing(x) -> Saltish(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Waxing(x) and Wasteful(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nforall x (Saltish(x) and Pitiable(x) -> Waxing(x))\nforall x (Pitiable(x) -> Saltish(x))\n\nnot Agamous(mona)\n\ntherefore Agamous(mona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Pansy is unbiased. Pansy is audacious. Pansy is cheering. Pansy is detonative. Luce is unbiased. Luce is henpecked. Jeanelle is audacious. Jeanelle is detonative. Adolph is anaglyptic. Adolph is henpecked. Kind people are unbiased. All cheering, anaglyptic people are bohemian. All detonative people are unbiased. All anaglyptic, henpecked people are cheering. If someone is bohemian and cheering then they are anaglyptic. All cheering people are bohemian. Adolph is cheering.", "logic": "\nUnbiased(pansy)\nAudacious(pansy)\nCheering(pansy)\nDetonative(pansy)\nUnbiased(luce)\nHenpecked(luce)\nAudacious(jeanelle)\nDetonative(jeanelle)\nAnaglyptic(adolph)\nHenpecked(adolph)\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) and Anaglyptic(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Detonative(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) and Henpecked(x) -> Cheering(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Cheering(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) -> Bohemian(x))\n\nCheering(adolph)\n\nAnaglyptic(adolph) and Henpecked(adolph) and forall x (Anaglyptic(x) and Henpecked(x) -> Cheering(x)) -> therefore Cheering(adolph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Frederich is rotary. Frederich is unkind. Frederich is vaporific. Frederich is dropsical. Annmarie is rotary. Annmarie is secretory. Kendall is unkind. Kendall is dropsical. Herbie is carbonic. Herbie is secretory. Kind people are rotary. All vaporific, carbonic people are euphonous. All dropsical people are rotary. All carbonic, secretory people are vaporific. If someone is euphonous and vaporific then they are carbonic. All vaporific people are euphonous. Kendall is not rotary.", "logic": "\nRotary(frederich)\nUnkind(frederich)\nVaporific(frederich)\nDropsical(frederich)\nRotary(annmarie)\nSecretory(annmarie)\nUnkind(kendall)\nDropsical(kendall)\nCarbonic(herbie)\nSecretory(herbie)\nforall x (Secretory(x) -> Rotary(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) and Carbonic(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Dropsical(x) -> Rotary(x))\nforall x (Carbonic(x) and Secretory(x) -> Vaporific(x))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and Vaporific(x) -> Carbonic(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) -> Euphonous(x))\n\nnot Rotary(kendall)\n\nDropsical(kendall) and forall x (Dropsical(x) -> Rotary(x)) -> therefore Rotary(kendall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Ianthe is aramaic. Ianthe is topical. Ianthe is unenviable. Ianthe is fragile. Amelita is aramaic. Amelita is libelous. Cordula is topical. Cordula is fragile. Clint is driven. Clint is libelous. Kind people are aramaic. All unenviable, driven people are nocturnal. All fragile people are aramaic. All driven, libelous people are unenviable. If someone is nocturnal and unenviable then they are driven. All unenviable people are nocturnal. Clint is nocturnal.", "logic": "\nAramaic(ianthe)\nTopical(ianthe)\nUnenviable(ianthe)\nFragile(ianthe)\nAramaic(amelita)\nLibelous(amelita)\nTopical(cordula)\nFragile(cordula)\nDriven(clint)\nLibelous(clint)\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nforall x (Unenviable(x) and Driven(x) -> Nocturnal(x))\nforall x (Fragile(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Libelous(x) -> Unenviable(x))\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) and Unenviable(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Unenviable(x) -> Nocturnal(x))\n\nNocturnal(clint)\n\nDriven(clint) and Libelous(clint) and forall x (Driven(x) and Libelous(x) -> Unenviable(x)) -> therefore Unenviable(clint) Unenviable(clint) and forall x (Unenviable(x) -> Nocturnal(x)) -> therefore Nocturnal(clint)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Ange is unwounded. Ange is concessive. Ange is meridian. Ange is jacobean. Shauna is unwounded. Shauna is nether. Ruddie is concessive. Ruddie is jacobean. Eveleen is patched. Eveleen is nether. Kind people are unwounded. All meridian, patched people are plundering. All jacobean people are unwounded. All patched, nether people are meridian. If someone is plundering and meridian then they are patched. All meridian people are plundering. Eveleen is not plundering.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(ange)\nConcessive(ange)\nMeridian(ange)\nJacobean(ange)\nUnwounded(shauna)\nNether(shauna)\nConcessive(ruddie)\nJacobean(ruddie)\nPatched(eveleen)\nNether(eveleen)\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Meridian(x) and Patched(x) -> Plundering(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Patched(x) and Nether(x) -> Meridian(x))\nforall x (Plundering(x) and Meridian(x) -> Patched(x))\nforall x (Meridian(x) -> Plundering(x))\n\nnot Plundering(eveleen)\n\nPatched(eveleen) and Nether(eveleen) and forall x (Patched(x) and Nether(x) -> Meridian(x)) -> therefore Meridian(eveleen) Meridian(eveleen) and forall x (Meridian(x) -> Plundering(x)) -> therefore Plundering(eveleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Myriam is explicit. Myriam is geologic. Myriam is stomachal. Myriam is orchestral. Stevana is explicit. Stevana is mastered. Selig is geologic. Selig is orchestral. Ismail is nonviscid. Ismail is mastered. Kind people are explicit. All stomachal, nonviscid people are tined. All orchestral people are explicit. All nonviscid, mastered people are stomachal. If someone is tined and stomachal then they are nonviscid. All stomachal people are tined. Stevana is not tined.", "logic": "\nExplicit(myriam)\nGeologic(myriam)\nStomachal(myriam)\nOrchestral(myriam)\nExplicit(stevana)\nMastered(stevana)\nGeologic(selig)\nOrchestral(selig)\nNonviscid(ismail)\nMastered(ismail)\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Explicit(x))\nforall x (Stomachal(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) -> Explicit(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) and Mastered(x) -> Stomachal(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) and Stomachal(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Stomachal(x) -> Tined(x))\n\nnot Tined(stevana)\n\nforall x (Stomachal(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Tined(x)) <- forall x (Nonviscid(x) and Mastered(x) -> Stomachal(x)) <- forall x (Tined(x) and Stomachal(x) -> Nonviscid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Lisetta is canine. Lisetta is unhallowed. Lisetta is mithraic. Lisetta is myopathic. Petrina is canine. Petrina is predacious. Mira is unhallowed. Mira is myopathic. Steffen is insoluble. Steffen is predacious. Kind people are canine. All mithraic, insoluble people are treated. All myopathic people are canine. All insoluble, predacious people are mithraic. If someone is treated and mithraic then they are insoluble. All mithraic people are treated. Petrina is insoluble.", "logic": "\nCanine(lisetta)\nUnhallowed(lisetta)\nMithraic(lisetta)\nMyopathic(lisetta)\nCanine(petrina)\nPredacious(petrina)\nUnhallowed(mira)\nMyopathic(mira)\nInsoluble(steffen)\nPredacious(steffen)\nforall x (Predacious(x) -> Canine(x))\nforall x (Mithraic(x) and Insoluble(x) -> Treated(x))\nforall x (Myopathic(x) -> Canine(x))\nforall x (Insoluble(x) and Predacious(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Treated(x) and Mithraic(x) -> Insoluble(x))\nforall x (Mithraic(x) -> Treated(x))\n\nInsoluble(petrina)\n\nforall x (Treated(x) and Mithraic(x) -> Insoluble(x)) <- forall x (Insoluble(x) and Predacious(x) -> Mithraic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Mahalia is mystifying. Mahalia is porcine. Mahalia is cosmologic. Mahalia is bruneian. Casie is mystifying. Casie is antitumour. Cortney is porcine. Cortney is bruneian. Andy is derisive. Andy is antitumour. Kind people are mystifying. All cosmologic, derisive people are moire. All bruneian people are mystifying. All derisive, antitumour people are cosmologic. If someone is moire and cosmologic then they are derisive. All cosmologic people are moire. Cortney is not cosmologic.", "logic": "\nMystifying(mahalia)\nPorcine(mahalia)\nCosmologic(mahalia)\nBruneian(mahalia)\nMystifying(casie)\nAntitumour(casie)\nPorcine(cortney)\nBruneian(cortney)\nDerisive(andy)\nAntitumour(andy)\nforall x (Antitumour(x) -> Mystifying(x))\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) and Derisive(x) -> Moire(x))\nforall x (Bruneian(x) -> Mystifying(x))\nforall x (Derisive(x) and Antitumour(x) -> Cosmologic(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) and Cosmologic(x) -> Derisive(x))\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Moire(x))\n\nnot Cosmologic(cortney)\n\nforall x (Derisive(x) and Antitumour(x) -> Cosmologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Rocky is balky. Rocky is congealed. Rocky is grungy. Rocky is proper. Trixi is balky. Trixi is coiled. Maible is congealed. Maible is proper. Andriana is auld. Andriana is coiled. Kind people are balky. All grungy, auld people are unwished. All proper people are balky. All auld, coiled people are grungy. If someone is unwished and grungy then they are auld. All grungy people are unwished. Trixi is congealed.", "logic": "\nBalky(rocky)\nCongealed(rocky)\nGrungy(rocky)\nProper(rocky)\nBalky(trixi)\nCoiled(trixi)\nCongealed(maible)\nProper(maible)\nAuld(andriana)\nCoiled(andriana)\nforall x (Coiled(x) -> Balky(x))\nforall x (Grungy(x) and Auld(x) -> Unwished(x))\nforall x (Proper(x) -> Balky(x))\nforall x (Auld(x) and Coiled(x) -> Grungy(x))\nforall x (Unwished(x) and Grungy(x) -> Auld(x))\nforall x (Grungy(x) -> Unwished(x))\n\nCongealed(trixi)\n\nCongealed(trixi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Cathy is piscatory. Cathy is made. Cathy is littered. Cathy is spoilable. Vikki is piscatory. Vikki is doting. Malvina is made. Malvina is spoilable. Elmer is receding. Elmer is doting. Kind people are piscatory. All littered, receding people are unabashed. All spoilable people are piscatory. All receding, doting people are littered. If someone is unabashed and littered then they are receding. All littered people are unabashed. Elmer is not made.", "logic": "\nPiscatory(cathy)\nMade(cathy)\nLittered(cathy)\nSpoilable(cathy)\nPiscatory(vikki)\nDoting(vikki)\nMade(malvina)\nSpoilable(malvina)\nReceding(elmer)\nDoting(elmer)\nforall x (Doting(x) -> Piscatory(x))\nforall x (Littered(x) and Receding(x) -> Unabashed(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Piscatory(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) and Doting(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Unabashed(x) and Littered(x) -> Receding(x))\nforall x (Littered(x) -> Unabashed(x))\n\nnot Made(elmer)\n\nnot Made(elmer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Liza is billion. Liza is squeaking. Liza is bicameral. Liza is starchless. Joana is billion. Joana is renunciant. Laurette is squeaking. Laurette is starchless. Annnora is congruous. Annnora is renunciant. Kind people are billion. All bicameral, congruous people are duple. All starchless people are billion. All congruous, renunciant people are bicameral. If someone is duple and bicameral then they are congruous. All bicameral people are duple. Liza is renunciant.", "logic": "\nBillion(liza)\nSqueaking(liza)\nBicameral(liza)\nStarchless(liza)\nBillion(joana)\nRenunciant(joana)\nSqueaking(laurette)\nStarchless(laurette)\nCongruous(annnora)\nRenunciant(annnora)\nforall x (Renunciant(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Bicameral(x) and Congruous(x) -> Duple(x))\nforall x (Starchless(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) and Renunciant(x) -> Bicameral(x))\nforall x (Duple(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Congruous(x))\nforall x (Bicameral(x) -> Duple(x))\n\nRenunciant(liza)\n\nRenunciant(liza) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1856"} {"premises": "Marabel is unwooded. Marabel is gusseted. Allyce is uterine. Allyce is unwooded. Allyce is not gusseted. Amanda is diluted. Amanda is unwooded. Amanda is gusseted. Amanda is carpetbag. Jonny is carpetbag. If something is gusseted and unwooded then it is panoplied. All panoplied things are not uterine. Allyce is not gusseted.", "logic": "\nUnwooded(marabel)\nGusseted(marabel)\nUterine(allyce)\nUnwooded(allyce)\nnot Gusseted(allyce)\nDiluted(amanda)\nUnwooded(amanda)\nGusseted(amanda)\nCarpetbag(amanda)\nCarpetbag(jonny)\nforall x (Gusseted(x) and Unwooded(x) -> Panoplied(x))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> not Uterine(x))\n\nnot Gusseted(allyce)\n\ntherefore not Gusseted(allyce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Alston is ototoxic. Alston is nonmusical. Reggy is eight. Reggy is ototoxic. Reggy is not nonmusical. Lynn is messy. Lynn is ototoxic. Lynn is nonmusical. Lynn is unkindled. Clarice is unkindled. If something is nonmusical and ototoxic then it is monolithic. All monolithic things are not eight. Reggy is not eight.", "logic": "\nOtotoxic(alston)\nNonmusical(alston)\nEight(reggy)\nOtotoxic(reggy)\nnot Nonmusical(reggy)\nMessy(lynn)\nOtotoxic(lynn)\nNonmusical(lynn)\nUnkindled(lynn)\nUnkindled(clarice)\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) and Ototoxic(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Monolithic(x) -> not Eight(x))\n\nnot Eight(reggy)\n\ntherefore Eight(reggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Cindra is weighted. Cindra is inactive. Jerold is unified. Jerold is weighted. Jerold is not inactive. Braden is insensate. Braden is weighted. Braden is inactive. Braden is proverbial. Levin is proverbial. If something is inactive and weighted then it is lxxx. All lxxx things are not unified. Braden is lxxx.", "logic": "\nWeighted(cindra)\nInactive(cindra)\nUnified(jerold)\nWeighted(jerold)\nnot Inactive(jerold)\nInsensate(braden)\nWeighted(braden)\nInactive(braden)\nProverbial(braden)\nProverbial(levin)\nforall x (Inactive(x) and Weighted(x) -> Lxxx(x))\nforall x (Lxxx(x) -> not Unified(x))\n\nLxxx(braden)\n\nInactive(braden) and Weighted(braden) and forall x (Inactive(x) and Weighted(x) -> Lxxx(x)) -> therefore Lxxx(braden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Iggie is pacifist. Iggie is lunar. Vivienne is advance. Vivienne is pacifist. Vivienne is not lunar. Lonee is excitant. Lonee is pacifist. Lonee is lunar. Lonee is cosmogonic. Boniface is cosmogonic. If something is lunar and pacifist then it is ventricous. All ventricous things are not advance. Iggie is not ventricous.", "logic": "\nPacifist(iggie)\nLunar(iggie)\nAdvance(vivienne)\nPacifist(vivienne)\nnot Lunar(vivienne)\nExcitant(lonee)\nPacifist(lonee)\nLunar(lonee)\nCosmogonic(lonee)\nCosmogonic(boniface)\nforall x (Lunar(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Ventricous(x))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> not Advance(x))\n\nnot Ventricous(iggie)\n\nLunar(iggie) and Pacifist(iggie) and forall x (Lunar(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Ventricous(x)) -> therefore Ventricous(iggie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Sybilla is sourish. Sybilla is refractive. Nunzio is cute. Nunzio is sourish. Nunzio is not refractive. Danell is unploughed. Danell is sourish. Danell is refractive. Danell is according. Nikki is according. If something is refractive and sourish then it is vigilant. All vigilant things are not cute. Danell is not cute.", "logic": "\nSourish(sybilla)\nRefractive(sybilla)\nCute(nunzio)\nSourish(nunzio)\nnot Refractive(nunzio)\nUnploughed(danell)\nSourish(danell)\nRefractive(danell)\nAccording(danell)\nAccording(nikki)\nforall x (Refractive(x) and Sourish(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> not Cute(x))\n\nnot Cute(danell)\n\nRefractive(danell) and Sourish(danell) and forall x (Refractive(x) and Sourish(x) -> Vigilant(x)) -> therefore Vigilant(danell) Vigilant(danell) and forall x (Vigilant(x) -> not Cute(x)) -> therefore not Cute(danell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Jud is bulblike. Jud is outside. Elliott is seeable. Elliott is bulblike. Elliott is not outside. Antonino is executed. Antonino is bulblike. Antonino is outside. Antonino is flighty. Barby is flighty. If something is outside and bulblike then it is cardboard. All cardboard things are not seeable. Antonino is seeable.", "logic": "\nBulblike(jud)\nOutside(jud)\nSeeable(elliott)\nBulblike(elliott)\nnot Outside(elliott)\nExecuted(antonino)\nBulblike(antonino)\nOutside(antonino)\nFlighty(antonino)\nFlighty(barby)\nforall x (Outside(x) and Bulblike(x) -> Cardboard(x))\nforall x (Cardboard(x) -> not Seeable(x))\n\nSeeable(antonino)\n\nOutside(antonino) and Bulblike(antonino) and forall x (Outside(x) and Bulblike(x) -> Cardboard(x)) -> therefore Cardboard(antonino) Cardboard(antonino) and forall x (Cardboard(x) -> not Seeable(x)) -> therefore not Seeable(antonino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Wallis is sliced. Wallis is scalloped. Claudetta is impacted. Claudetta is sliced. Claudetta is not scalloped. Mona is clitoral. Mona is sliced. Mona is scalloped. Mona is synchronal. Gita is synchronal. If something is scalloped and sliced then it is excitatory. All excitatory things are not impacted. Claudetta is not excitatory.", "logic": "\nSliced(wallis)\nScalloped(wallis)\nImpacted(claudetta)\nSliced(claudetta)\nnot Scalloped(claudetta)\nClitoral(mona)\nSliced(mona)\nScalloped(mona)\nSynchronal(mona)\nSynchronal(gita)\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Sliced(x) -> Excitatory(x))\nforall x (Excitatory(x) -> not Impacted(x))\n\nnot Excitatory(claudetta)\n\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Sliced(x) -> Excitatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Rosene is upsetting. Rosene is polyoicous. Regine is accredited. Regine is upsetting. Regine is not polyoicous. Ronnie is deviant. Ronnie is upsetting. Ronnie is polyoicous. Ronnie is innocuous. Benton is innocuous. If something is polyoicous and upsetting then it is anodic. All anodic things are not accredited. Benton is anodic.", "logic": "\nUpsetting(rosene)\nPolyoicous(rosene)\nAccredited(regine)\nUpsetting(regine)\nnot Polyoicous(regine)\nDeviant(ronnie)\nUpsetting(ronnie)\nPolyoicous(ronnie)\nInnocuous(ronnie)\nInnocuous(benton)\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) and Upsetting(x) -> Anodic(x))\nforall x (Anodic(x) -> not Accredited(x))\n\nAnodic(benton)\n\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) and Upsetting(x) -> Anodic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Sasha is prodromic. Sasha is peltate. Earl is bigger. Earl is prodromic. Earl is not peltate. Michel is throwaway. Michel is prodromic. Michel is peltate. Michel is dapper. Morry is dapper. If something is peltate and prodromic then it is lettered. All lettered things are not bigger. Sasha is not dapper.", "logic": "\nProdromic(sasha)\nPeltate(sasha)\nBigger(earl)\nProdromic(earl)\nnot Peltate(earl)\nThrowaway(michel)\nProdromic(michel)\nPeltate(michel)\nDapper(michel)\nDapper(morry)\nforall x (Peltate(x) and Prodromic(x) -> Lettered(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> not Bigger(x))\n\nnot Dapper(sasha)\n\nnot Dapper(sasha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Gwenette is yielding. Gwenette is sacculated. Taffy is wavelike. Taffy is yielding. Taffy is not sacculated. Shara is outspread. Shara is yielding. Shara is sacculated. Shara is windup. Anet is windup. If something is sacculated and yielding then it is anaclitic. All anaclitic things are not wavelike. Anet is wavelike.", "logic": "\nYielding(gwenette)\nSacculated(gwenette)\nWavelike(taffy)\nYielding(taffy)\nnot Sacculated(taffy)\nOutspread(shara)\nYielding(shara)\nSacculated(shara)\nWindup(shara)\nWindup(anet)\nforall x (Sacculated(x) and Yielding(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) -> not Wavelike(x))\n\nWavelike(anet)\n\nWavelike(anet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Dara is sarawakian. Dara is cubistic. Gloriane is memberless. Gloriane is sarawakian. Gloriane is not cubistic. Luciano is libertine. Luciano is sarawakian. Luciano is cubistic. Luciano is sordid. Reese is sordid. If something is cubistic and sarawakian then it is acquainted. All acquainted things are not memberless. Dara is not libertine.", "logic": "\nSarawakian(dara)\nCubistic(dara)\nMemberless(gloriane)\nSarawakian(gloriane)\nnot Cubistic(gloriane)\nLibertine(luciano)\nSarawakian(luciano)\nCubistic(luciano)\nSordid(luciano)\nSordid(reese)\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Sarawakian(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> not Memberless(x))\n\nnot Libertine(dara)\n\nnot Libertine(dara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Martainn is outer. Martainn is singable. Korie is nominated. Korie is outer. Korie is not singable. Doralynne is hoggish. Doralynne is outer. Doralynne is singable. Doralynne is semiotical. Doll is semiotical. If something is singable and outer then it is chassidic. All chassidic things are not nominated. Korie is semiotical.", "logic": "\nOuter(martainn)\nSingable(martainn)\nNominated(korie)\nOuter(korie)\nnot Singable(korie)\nHoggish(doralynne)\nOuter(doralynne)\nSingable(doralynne)\nSemiotical(doralynne)\nSemiotical(doll)\nforall x (Singable(x) and Outer(x) -> Chassidic(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) -> not Nominated(x))\n\nSemiotical(korie)\n\nSemiotical(korie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1435"} {"premises": "Genvieve is bizarre. Paten is zymolytic. Malka is not zymolytic. If Malka is divinatory and Malka is iliac then Malka is not tragic. All bizarre people are divinatory. If someone is agelong then they are iliac. All bizarre people are agelong. If Paten is tragic and Paten is restive then Paten is not divinatory. Red people are zymolytic. If someone is bizarre and not iliac then they are zymolytic. If someone is iliac and zymolytic then they are restive. Genvieve is bizarre.", "logic": "\nBizarre(genvieve)\nZymolytic(paten)\nnot Zymolytic(malka)\nDivinatory(malka) and Iliac(malka) -> not Tragic(malka)\nforall x (Bizarre(x) -> Divinatory(x))\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Iliac(x))\nforall x (Bizarre(x) -> Agelong(x))\nTragic(paten) and Restive(paten) -> not Divinatory(paten)\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Zymolytic(x))\nforall x (Bizarre(x) and not Iliac(x) -> Zymolytic(x))\nforall x (Iliac(x) and Zymolytic(x) -> Restive(x))\n\nBizarre(genvieve)\n\ntherefore Bizarre(genvieve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Georgetta is miasmic. Reagan is monthlong. Elvis is not monthlong. If Elvis is nepali and Elvis is manic then Elvis is not iraqi. All miasmic people are nepali. If someone is bedimmed then they are manic. All miasmic people are bedimmed. If Reagan is iraqi and Reagan is emblematic then Reagan is not nepali. Red people are monthlong. If someone is miasmic and not manic then they are monthlong. If someone is manic and monthlong then they are emblematic. Georgetta is not miasmic.", "logic": "\nMiasmic(georgetta)\nMonthlong(reagan)\nnot Monthlong(elvis)\nNepali(elvis) and Manic(elvis) -> not Iraqi(elvis)\nforall x (Miasmic(x) -> Nepali(x))\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) -> Manic(x))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) -> Bedimmed(x))\nIraqi(reagan) and Emblematic(reagan) -> not Nepali(reagan)\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) and not Manic(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Manic(x) and Monthlong(x) -> Emblematic(x))\n\nnot Miasmic(georgetta)\n\ntherefore Miasmic(georgetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Ferguson is intimal. Elwood is combustive. Storey is not combustive. If Storey is caesural and Storey is christless then Storey is not sweetish. All intimal people are caesural. If someone is brutal then they are christless. All intimal people are brutal. If Elwood is sweetish and Elwood is captivated then Elwood is not caesural. Red people are combustive. If someone is intimal and not christless then they are combustive. If someone is christless and combustive then they are captivated. Ferguson is brutal.", "logic": "\nIntimal(ferguson)\nCombustive(elwood)\nnot Combustive(storey)\nCaesural(storey) and Christless(storey) -> not Sweetish(storey)\nforall x (Intimal(x) -> Caesural(x))\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Christless(x))\nforall x (Intimal(x) -> Brutal(x))\nSweetish(elwood) and Captivated(elwood) -> not Caesural(elwood)\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Combustive(x))\nforall x (Intimal(x) and not Christless(x) -> Combustive(x))\nforall x (Christless(x) and Combustive(x) -> Captivated(x))\n\nBrutal(ferguson)\n\nIntimal(ferguson) and forall x (Intimal(x) -> Brutal(x)) -> therefore Brutal(ferguson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Ruthann is marvellous. Reagan is billowy. Carri is not billowy. If Carri is soused and Carri is deterrent then Carri is not tawny. All marvellous people are soused. If someone is military then they are deterrent. All marvellous people are military. If Reagan is tawny and Reagan is sissyish then Reagan is not soused. Red people are billowy. If someone is marvellous and not deterrent then they are billowy. If someone is deterrent and billowy then they are sissyish. Ruthann is not military.", "logic": "\nMarvellous(ruthann)\nBillowy(reagan)\nnot Billowy(carri)\nSoused(carri) and Deterrent(carri) -> not Tawny(carri)\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Military(x) -> Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Military(x))\nTawny(reagan) and Sissyish(reagan) -> not Soused(reagan)\nforall x (Military(x) -> Billowy(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) and not Deterrent(x) -> Billowy(x))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and Billowy(x) -> Sissyish(x))\n\nnot Military(ruthann)\n\nMarvellous(ruthann) and forall x (Marvellous(x) -> Military(x)) -> therefore Military(ruthann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Stanton is unprepared. Alexander is canicular. Fredrika is not canicular. If Fredrika is copulative and Fredrika is qualified then Fredrika is not decadent. All unprepared people are copulative. If someone is glottal then they are qualified. All unprepared people are glottal. If Alexander is decadent and Alexander is risque then Alexander is not copulative. Red people are canicular. If someone is unprepared and not qualified then they are canicular. If someone is qualified and canicular then they are risque. Stanton is qualified.", "logic": "\nUnprepared(stanton)\nCanicular(alexander)\nnot Canicular(fredrika)\nCopulative(fredrika) and Qualified(fredrika) -> not Decadent(fredrika)\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Copulative(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Qualified(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Glottal(x))\nDecadent(alexander) and Risque(alexander) -> not Copulative(alexander)\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Canicular(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) and not Qualified(x) -> Canicular(x))\nforall x (Qualified(x) and Canicular(x) -> Risque(x))\n\nQualified(stanton)\n\nUnprepared(stanton) and forall x (Unprepared(x) -> Glottal(x)) -> therefore Glottal(stanton) Glottal(stanton) and forall x (Glottal(x) -> Qualified(x)) -> therefore Qualified(stanton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Evy is apomictic. Riva is robed. Lorita is not robed. If Lorita is extravert and Lorita is uncured then Lorita is not obovate. All apomictic people are extravert. If someone is antrorse then they are uncured. All apomictic people are antrorse. If Riva is obovate and Riva is shagged then Riva is not extravert. Red people are robed. If someone is apomictic and not uncured then they are robed. If someone is uncured and robed then they are shagged. Evy is not robed.", "logic": "\nApomictic(evy)\nRobed(riva)\nnot Robed(lorita)\nExtravert(lorita) and Uncured(lorita) -> not Obovate(lorita)\nforall x (Apomictic(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Antrorse(x) -> Uncured(x))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nObovate(riva) and Shagged(riva) -> not Extravert(riva)\nforall x (Antrorse(x) -> Robed(x))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) and not Uncured(x) -> Robed(x))\nforall x (Uncured(x) and Robed(x) -> Shagged(x))\n\nnot Robed(evy)\n\nApomictic(evy) and forall x (Apomictic(x) -> Antrorse(x)) -> therefore Antrorse(evy) Antrorse(evy) and forall x (Antrorse(x) -> Robed(x)) -> therefore Robed(evy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Kathlene is bouldered. Zeus is maggoty. Mindy is not maggoty. If Mindy is geodesic and Mindy is impellent then Mindy is not authorised. All bouldered people are geodesic. If someone is anamorphic then they are impellent. All bouldered people are anamorphic. If Zeus is authorised and Zeus is obliging then Zeus is not geodesic. Red people are maggoty. If someone is bouldered and not impellent then they are maggoty. If someone is impellent and maggoty then they are obliging. Kathlene is obliging.", "logic": "\nBouldered(kathlene)\nMaggoty(zeus)\nnot Maggoty(mindy)\nGeodesic(mindy) and Impellent(mindy) -> not Authorised(mindy)\nforall x (Bouldered(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) -> Impellent(x))\nforall x (Bouldered(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nAuthorised(zeus) and Obliging(zeus) -> not Geodesic(zeus)\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Bouldered(x) and not Impellent(x) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Impellent(x) and Maggoty(x) -> Obliging(x))\n\nObliging(kathlene)\n\nBouldered(kathlene) and forall x (Bouldered(x) -> Anamorphic(x)) -> therefore Anamorphic(kathlene) Anamorphic(kathlene) and forall x (Anamorphic(x) -> Impellent(x)) -> therefore Impellent(kathlene) Bouldered(kathlene) and forall x (Bouldered(x) -> Anamorphic(x)) -> therefore Anamorphic(kathlene) Anamorphic(kathlene) and forall x (Anamorphic(x) -> Maggoty(x)) -> therefore Maggoty(kathlene) Impellent(kathlene) and Maggoty(kathlene) and forall x (Impellent(x) and Maggoty(x) -> Obliging(x)) -> therefore Obliging(kathlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Zebedee is negroid. Ivory is incarnate. Fenelia is not incarnate. If Fenelia is beneficial and Fenelia is striking then Fenelia is not corrosive. All negroid people are beneficial. If someone is pervious then they are striking. All negroid people are pervious. If Ivory is corrosive and Ivory is paying then Ivory is not beneficial. Red people are incarnate. If someone is negroid and not striking then they are incarnate. If someone is striking and incarnate then they are paying. Zebedee is not paying.", "logic": "\nNegroid(zebedee)\nIncarnate(ivory)\nnot Incarnate(fenelia)\nBeneficial(fenelia) and Striking(fenelia) -> not Corrosive(fenelia)\nforall x (Negroid(x) -> Beneficial(x))\nforall x (Pervious(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Negroid(x) -> Pervious(x))\nCorrosive(ivory) and Paying(ivory) -> not Beneficial(ivory)\nforall x (Pervious(x) -> Incarnate(x))\nforall x (Negroid(x) and not Striking(x) -> Incarnate(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) and Incarnate(x) -> Paying(x))\n\nnot Paying(zebedee)\n\nNegroid(zebedee) and forall x (Negroid(x) -> Pervious(x)) -> therefore Pervious(zebedee) Pervious(zebedee) and forall x (Pervious(x) -> Striking(x)) -> therefore Striking(zebedee) Negroid(zebedee) and forall x (Negroid(x) -> Pervious(x)) -> therefore Pervious(zebedee) Pervious(zebedee) and forall x (Pervious(x) -> Incarnate(x)) -> therefore Incarnate(zebedee) Striking(zebedee) and Incarnate(zebedee) and forall x (Striking(x) and Incarnate(x) -> Paying(x)) -> therefore Paying(zebedee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Fred is regenerate. Seana is decorous. Terry is not decorous. If Terry is spanish and Terry is evocative then Terry is not scrotal. All regenerate people are spanish. If someone is exhausted then they are evocative. All regenerate people are exhausted. If Seana is scrotal and Seana is precatory then Seana is not spanish. Red people are decorous. If someone is regenerate and not evocative then they are decorous. If someone is evocative and decorous then they are precatory. Seana is not precatory.", "logic": "\nRegenerate(fred)\nDecorous(seana)\nnot Decorous(terry)\nSpanish(terry) and Evocative(terry) -> not Scrotal(terry)\nforall x (Regenerate(x) -> Spanish(x))\nforall x (Exhausted(x) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Regenerate(x) -> Exhausted(x))\nScrotal(seana) and Precatory(seana) -> not Spanish(seana)\nforall x (Exhausted(x) -> Decorous(x))\nforall x (Regenerate(x) and not Evocative(x) -> Decorous(x))\nforall x (Evocative(x) and Decorous(x) -> Precatory(x))\n\nnot Precatory(seana)\n\nforall x (Evocative(x) and Decorous(x) -> Precatory(x)) <- forall x (Exhausted(x) -> Evocative(x)) <- forall x (Regenerate(x) -> Exhausted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Wenda is equipotent. Kathy is flaxen. Nedi is not flaxen. If Nedi is synoptic and Nedi is jingoistic then Nedi is not humorous. All equipotent people are synoptic. If someone is tippy then they are jingoistic. All equipotent people are tippy. If Kathy is humorous and Kathy is unworldly then Kathy is not synoptic. Red people are flaxen. If someone is equipotent and not jingoistic then they are flaxen. If someone is jingoistic and flaxen then they are unworldly. Nedi is tippy.", "logic": "\nEquipotent(wenda)\nFlaxen(kathy)\nnot Flaxen(nedi)\nSynoptic(nedi) and Jingoistic(nedi) -> not Humorous(nedi)\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Synoptic(x))\nforall x (Tippy(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Tippy(x))\nHumorous(kathy) and Unworldly(kathy) -> not Synoptic(kathy)\nforall x (Tippy(x) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and not Jingoistic(x) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) and Flaxen(x) -> Unworldly(x))\n\nTippy(nedi)\n\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Tippy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Patric is ammonitic. Barbey is vapid. Fabian is not vapid. If Fabian is intrinsic and Fabian is unabashed then Fabian is not unmovable. All ammonitic people are intrinsic. If someone is armenian then they are unabashed. All ammonitic people are armenian. If Barbey is unmovable and Barbey is gnarled then Barbey is not intrinsic. Red people are vapid. If someone is ammonitic and not unabashed then they are vapid. If someone is unabashed and vapid then they are gnarled. Barbey is not armenian.", "logic": "\nAmmonitic(patric)\nVapid(barbey)\nnot Vapid(fabian)\nIntrinsic(fabian) and Unabashed(fabian) -> not Unmovable(fabian)\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> Unabashed(x))\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Armenian(x))\nUnmovable(barbey) and Gnarled(barbey) -> not Intrinsic(barbey)\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) and not Unabashed(x) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Unabashed(x) and Vapid(x) -> Gnarled(x))\n\nnot Armenian(barbey)\n\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Armenian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Lira is peaceful. Happy is dutiful. Orville is not dutiful. If Orville is disdainful and Orville is sentential then Orville is not undershot. All peaceful people are disdainful. If someone is exorbitant then they are sentential. All peaceful people are exorbitant. If Happy is undershot and Happy is julian then Happy is not disdainful. Red people are dutiful. If someone is peaceful and not sentential then they are dutiful. If someone is sentential and dutiful then they are julian. Orville is julian.", "logic": "\nPeaceful(lira)\nDutiful(happy)\nnot Dutiful(orville)\nDisdainful(orville) and Sentential(orville) -> not Undershot(orville)\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Sentential(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nUndershot(happy) and Julian(happy) -> not Disdainful(happy)\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and not Sentential(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Sentential(x) and Dutiful(x) -> Julian(x))\n\nJulian(orville)\n\nforall x (Sentential(x) and Dutiful(x) -> Julian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Dmitri is obstinate. Gussi is cheeky. Heinrich is not cheeky. If Heinrich is peroneal and Heinrich is oriented then Heinrich is not sabine. All obstinate people are peroneal. If someone is preceding then they are oriented. All obstinate people are preceding. If Gussi is sabine and Gussi is dendroid then Gussi is not peroneal. Red people are cheeky. If someone is obstinate and not oriented then they are cheeky. If someone is oriented and cheeky then they are dendroid. Heinrich is not sabine.", "logic": "\nObstinate(dmitri)\nCheeky(gussi)\nnot Cheeky(heinrich)\nPeroneal(heinrich) and Oriented(heinrich) -> not Sabine(heinrich)\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> Peroneal(x))\nforall x (Preceding(x) -> Oriented(x))\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> Preceding(x))\nSabine(gussi) and Dendroid(gussi) -> not Peroneal(gussi)\nforall x (Preceding(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Obstinate(x) and not Oriented(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Oriented(x) and Cheeky(x) -> Dendroid(x))\n\nnot Sabine(heinrich)\n\nnot Sabine(heinrich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Arie is unrelated. Franklyn is monitory. Cleland is not monitory. If Cleland is xlvi and Cleland is chalky then Cleland is not colonic. All unrelated people are xlvi. If someone is nonaged then they are chalky. All unrelated people are nonaged. If Franklyn is colonic and Franklyn is monocled then Franklyn is not xlvi. Red people are monitory. If someone is unrelated and not chalky then they are monitory. If someone is chalky and monitory then they are monocled. Arie is colonic.", "logic": "\nUnrelated(arie)\nMonitory(franklyn)\nnot Monitory(cleland)\nXlvi(cleland) and Chalky(cleland) -> not Colonic(cleland)\nforall x (Unrelated(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Chalky(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nColonic(franklyn) and Monocled(franklyn) -> not Xlvi(franklyn)\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Monitory(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) and not Chalky(x) -> Monitory(x))\nforall x (Chalky(x) and Monitory(x) -> Monocled(x))\n\nColonic(arie)\n\nColonic(arie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Ernst is eyeless. Melania is ringlike. Darcie is not ringlike. If Darcie is precatory and Darcie is chanceful then Darcie is not readable. All eyeless people are precatory. If someone is glamourous then they are chanceful. All eyeless people are glamourous. If Melania is readable and Melania is unsanitary then Melania is not precatory. Red people are ringlike. If someone is eyeless and not chanceful then they are ringlike. If someone is chanceful and ringlike then they are unsanitary. Melania is not eyeless.", "logic": "\nEyeless(ernst)\nRinglike(melania)\nnot Ringlike(darcie)\nPrecatory(darcie) and Chanceful(darcie) -> not Readable(darcie)\nforall x (Eyeless(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Glamourous(x) -> Chanceful(x))\nforall x (Eyeless(x) -> Glamourous(x))\nReadable(melania) and Unsanitary(melania) -> not Precatory(melania)\nforall x (Glamourous(x) -> Ringlike(x))\nforall x (Eyeless(x) and not Chanceful(x) -> Ringlike(x))\nforall x (Chanceful(x) and Ringlike(x) -> Unsanitary(x))\n\nnot Eyeless(melania)\n\nnot Eyeless(melania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Abdullah is incurved. Herrick is desultory. Gabriela is not desultory. If Gabriela is latest and Gabriela is protrusile then Gabriela is not upstair. All incurved people are latest. If someone is awry then they are protrusile. All incurved people are awry. If Herrick is upstair and Herrick is catamenial then Herrick is not latest. Red people are desultory. If someone is incurved and not protrusile then they are desultory. If someone is protrusile and desultory then they are catamenial. Gabriela is incurved.", "logic": "\nIncurved(abdullah)\nDesultory(herrick)\nnot Desultory(gabriela)\nLatest(gabriela) and Protrusile(gabriela) -> not Upstair(gabriela)\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Latest(x))\nforall x (Awry(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Awry(x))\nUpstair(herrick) and Catamenial(herrick) -> not Latest(herrick)\nforall x (Awry(x) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) and not Protrusile(x) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) and Desultory(x) -> Catamenial(x))\n\nIncurved(gabriela)\n\nIncurved(gabriela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "The winthrop is hopeful. The winthrop is mismatched. The wilmette is unwished. If the wilmette immunize the winthrop then the winthrop immunize the wilmette. If something immunize the winthrop then the winthrop prickle the wilmette. If something is mismatched then it immunize the winthrop. If something is unwished then it backpedal the winthrop. If something prickle the wilmette then the wilmette prickle the winthrop. If something is hopeful and it prickle the winthrop then the winthrop is mismatched. The winthrop is hopeful.", "logic": "\nHopeful(winthrop)\nMismatched(winthrop)\nUnwished(wilmette)\nImmunize(wilmette, winthrop) -> Immunize(winthrop, wilmette)\nforall x (Immunize(x, winthrop) -> Prickle(winthrop, wilmette))\nforall x (Mismatched(x) -> Immunize(x, winthrop))\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> Backpedal(x, winthrop))\nforall x (Prickle(x, wilmette) -> Prickle(wilmette, winthrop))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) and Prickle(x, winthrop) -> Mismatched(winthrop))\n\nHopeful(winthrop)\n\ntherefore Hopeful(winthrop)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The ina is edgy. The ina is timbered. The ruddie is expectant. If the ruddie serve the ina then the ina serve the ruddie. If something serve the ina then the ina romanise the ruddie. If something is timbered then it serve the ina. If something is expectant then it inch the ina. If something romanise the ruddie then the ruddie romanise the ina. If something is edgy and it romanise the ina then the ina is timbered. The ina is not edgy.", "logic": "\nEdgy(ina)\nTimbered(ina)\nExpectant(ruddie)\nServe(ruddie, ina) -> Serve(ina, ruddie)\nforall x (Serve(x, ina) -> Romanise(ina, ruddie))\nforall x (Timbered(x) -> Serve(x, ina))\nforall x (Expectant(x) -> Inch(x, ina))\nforall x (Romanise(x, ruddie) -> Romanise(ruddie, ina))\nforall x (Edgy(x) and Romanise(x, ina) -> Timbered(ina))\n\nnot Edgy(ina)\n\ntherefore Edgy(ina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The jacenta is causeless. The jacenta is rummy. The allegra is flyspeck. If the allegra mismarry the jacenta then the jacenta mismarry the allegra. If something mismarry the jacenta then the jacenta loft the allegra. If something is rummy then it mismarry the jacenta. If something is flyspeck then it become the jacenta. If something loft the allegra then the allegra loft the jacenta. If something is causeless and it loft the jacenta then the jacenta is rummy. The allegra become the jacenta.", "logic": "\nCauseless(jacenta)\nRummy(jacenta)\nFlyspeck(allegra)\nMismarry(allegra, jacenta) -> Mismarry(jacenta, allegra)\nforall x (Mismarry(x, jacenta) -> Loft(jacenta, allegra))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Mismarry(x, jacenta))\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Become(x, jacenta))\nforall x (Loft(x, allegra) -> Loft(allegra, jacenta))\nforall x (Causeless(x) and Loft(x, jacenta) -> Rummy(jacenta))\n\nBecome(allegra, jacenta)\n\nFlyspeck(allegra) and forall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Become(x, jacenta)) -> therefore Become(allegra, jacenta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The diannne is unwavering. The diannne is aciduric. The merell is isomeric. If the merell grumble the diannne then the diannne grumble the merell. If something grumble the diannne then the diannne wrestle the merell. If something is aciduric then it grumble the diannne. If something is isomeric then it dismay the diannne. If something wrestle the merell then the merell wrestle the diannne. If something is unwavering and it wrestle the diannne then the diannne is aciduric. The diannne does not like the diannne.", "logic": "\nUnwavering(diannne)\nAciduric(diannne)\nIsomeric(merell)\nGrumble(merell, diannne) -> Grumble(diannne, merell)\nforall x (Grumble(x, diannne) -> Wrestle(diannne, merell))\nforall x (Aciduric(x) -> Grumble(x, diannne))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Dismay(x, diannne))\nforall x (Wrestle(x, merell) -> Wrestle(merell, diannne))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) and Wrestle(x, diannne) -> Aciduric(diannne))\n\nnot Grumble(diannne, diannne)\n\nAciduric(diannne) and forall x (Aciduric(x) -> Grumble(x, diannne)) -> therefore Grumble(diannne, diannne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The catherine is frosty. The catherine is roundabout. The carolyne is condemning. If the carolyne glisten the catherine then the catherine glisten the carolyne. If something glisten the catherine then the catherine squelch the carolyne. If something is roundabout then it glisten the catherine. If something is condemning then it appall the catherine. If something squelch the carolyne then the carolyne squelch the catherine. If something is frosty and it squelch the catherine then the catherine is roundabout. The catherine squelch the carolyne.", "logic": "\nFrosty(catherine)\nRoundabout(catherine)\nCondemning(carolyne)\nGlisten(carolyne, catherine) -> Glisten(catherine, carolyne)\nforall x (Glisten(x, catherine) -> Squelch(catherine, carolyne))\nforall x (Roundabout(x) -> Glisten(x, catherine))\nforall x (Condemning(x) -> Appall(x, catherine))\nforall x (Squelch(x, carolyne) -> Squelch(carolyne, catherine))\nforall x (Frosty(x) and Squelch(x, catherine) -> Roundabout(catherine))\n\nSquelch(catherine, carolyne)\n\nRoundabout(catherine) and forall x (Roundabout(x) -> Glisten(x, catherine)) -> therefore Glisten(catherine, catherine) Glisten(catherine, catherine) and forall x (Glisten(x, catherine) -> Squelch(catherine, carolyne)) -> therefore Squelch(catherine, carolyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The llewellyn is seated. The llewellyn is peregrine. The saxon is frugal. If the saxon sneak the llewellyn then the llewellyn sneak the saxon. If something sneak the llewellyn then the llewellyn wedel the saxon. If something is peregrine then it sneak the llewellyn. If something is frugal then it surfboard the llewellyn. If something wedel the saxon then the saxon wedel the llewellyn. If something is seated and it wedel the llewellyn then the llewellyn is peregrine. The llewellyn does not visit the saxon.", "logic": "\nSeated(llewellyn)\nPeregrine(llewellyn)\nFrugal(saxon)\nSneak(saxon, llewellyn) -> Sneak(llewellyn, saxon)\nforall x (Sneak(x, llewellyn) -> Wedel(llewellyn, saxon))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Sneak(x, llewellyn))\nforall x (Frugal(x) -> Surfboard(x, llewellyn))\nforall x (Wedel(x, saxon) -> Wedel(saxon, llewellyn))\nforall x (Seated(x) and Wedel(x, llewellyn) -> Peregrine(llewellyn))\n\nnot Wedel(llewellyn, saxon)\n\nPeregrine(llewellyn) and forall x (Peregrine(x) -> Sneak(x, llewellyn)) -> therefore Sneak(llewellyn, llewellyn) Sneak(llewellyn, llewellyn) and forall x (Sneak(x, llewellyn) -> Wedel(llewellyn, saxon)) -> therefore Wedel(llewellyn, saxon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The babara is acervate. The babara is verrucose. The silvester is bifoliate. If the silvester glimpse the babara then the babara glimpse the silvester. If something glimpse the babara then the babara benefice the silvester. If something is verrucose then it glimpse the babara. If something is bifoliate then it clink the babara. If something benefice the silvester then the silvester benefice the babara. If something is acervate and it benefice the babara then the babara is verrucose. The silvester benefice the babara.", "logic": "\nAcervate(babara)\nVerrucose(babara)\nBifoliate(silvester)\nGlimpse(silvester, babara) -> Glimpse(babara, silvester)\nforall x (Glimpse(x, babara) -> Benefice(babara, silvester))\nforall x (Verrucose(x) -> Glimpse(x, babara))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Clink(x, babara))\nforall x (Benefice(x, silvester) -> Benefice(silvester, babara))\nforall x (Acervate(x) and Benefice(x, babara) -> Verrucose(babara))\n\nBenefice(silvester, babara)\n\nVerrucose(babara) and forall x (Verrucose(x) -> Glimpse(x, babara)) -> therefore Glimpse(babara, babara) Glimpse(babara, babara) and forall x (Glimpse(x, babara) -> Benefice(babara, silvester)) -> therefore Benefice(babara, silvester) Benefice(babara, silvester) and forall x (Benefice(x, silvester) -> Benefice(silvester, babara)) -> therefore Benefice(silvester, babara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The glori is elastic. The glori is extempore. The thibaud is spiderlike. If the thibaud overspread the glori then the glori overspread the thibaud. If something overspread the glori then the glori summer the thibaud. If something is extempore then it overspread the glori. If something is spiderlike then it manifold the glori. If something summer the thibaud then the thibaud summer the glori. If something is elastic and it summer the glori then the glori is extempore. The thibaud does not visit the glori.", "logic": "\nElastic(glori)\nExtempore(glori)\nSpiderlike(thibaud)\nOverspread(thibaud, glori) -> Overspread(glori, thibaud)\nforall x (Overspread(x, glori) -> Summer(glori, thibaud))\nforall x (Extempore(x) -> Overspread(x, glori))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Manifold(x, glori))\nforall x (Summer(x, thibaud) -> Summer(thibaud, glori))\nforall x (Elastic(x) and Summer(x, glori) -> Extempore(glori))\n\nnot Summer(thibaud, glori)\n\nExtempore(glori) and forall x (Extempore(x) -> Overspread(x, glori)) -> therefore Overspread(glori, glori) Overspread(glori, glori) and forall x (Overspread(x, glori) -> Summer(glori, thibaud)) -> therefore Summer(glori, thibaud) Summer(glori, thibaud) and forall x (Summer(x, thibaud) -> Summer(thibaud, glori)) -> therefore Summer(thibaud, glori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The andy is italian. The andy is unlocated. The agnella is timeworn. If the agnella postmark the andy then the andy postmark the agnella. If something postmark the andy then the andy increase the agnella. If something is unlocated then it postmark the andy. If something is timeworn then it dehisce the andy. If something increase the agnella then the agnella increase the andy. If something is italian and it increase the andy then the andy is unlocated. The andy does not like the agnella.", "logic": "\nItalian(andy)\nUnlocated(andy)\nTimeworn(agnella)\nPostmark(agnella, andy) -> Postmark(andy, agnella)\nforall x (Postmark(x, andy) -> Increase(andy, agnella))\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Postmark(x, andy))\nforall x (Timeworn(x) -> Dehisce(x, andy))\nforall x (Increase(x, agnella) -> Increase(agnella, andy))\nforall x (Italian(x) and Increase(x, andy) -> Unlocated(andy))\n\nnot Postmark(andy, agnella)\n\nPostmark(agnella, andy) -> Postmark(andy, agnella) <- forall x (Unlocated(x) -> Postmark(x, andy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The donetta is choragic. The donetta is hilly. The gay is papillate. If the gay level the donetta then the donetta level the gay. If something level the donetta then the donetta espy the gay. If something is hilly then it level the donetta. If something is papillate then it picnic the donetta. If something espy the gay then the gay espy the donetta. If something is choragic and it espy the donetta then the donetta is hilly. The donetta picnic the donetta.", "logic": "\nChoragic(donetta)\nHilly(donetta)\nPapillate(gay)\nLevel(gay, donetta) -> Level(donetta, gay)\nforall x (Level(x, donetta) -> Espy(donetta, gay))\nforall x (Hilly(x) -> Level(x, donetta))\nforall x (Papillate(x) -> Picnic(x, donetta))\nforall x (Espy(x, gay) -> Espy(gay, donetta))\nforall x (Choragic(x) and Espy(x, donetta) -> Hilly(donetta))\n\nPicnic(donetta, donetta)\n\nforall x (Papillate(x) -> Picnic(x, donetta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The nigel is frenetic. The nigel is brazen. The morten is earned. If the morten rescue the nigel then the nigel rescue the morten. If something rescue the nigel then the nigel topple the morten. If something is brazen then it rescue the nigel. If something is earned then it refresh the nigel. If something topple the morten then the morten topple the nigel. If something is frenetic and it topple the nigel then the nigel is brazen. The morten does not like the nigel.", "logic": "\nFrenetic(nigel)\nBrazen(nigel)\nEarned(morten)\nRescue(morten, nigel) -> Rescue(nigel, morten)\nforall x (Rescue(x, nigel) -> Topple(nigel, morten))\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Rescue(x, nigel))\nforall x (Earned(x) -> Refresh(x, nigel))\nforall x (Topple(x, morten) -> Topple(morten, nigel))\nforall x (Frenetic(x) and Topple(x, nigel) -> Brazen(nigel))\n\nnot Rescue(morten, nigel)\n\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Rescue(x, nigel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The morgen is decollete. The morgen is analogue. The ann is missing. If the ann allege the morgen then the morgen allege the ann. If something allege the morgen then the morgen shove the ann. If something is analogue then it allege the morgen. If something is missing then it lisp the morgen. If something shove the ann then the ann shove the morgen. If something is decollete and it shove the morgen then the morgen is analogue. The ann lisp the ann.", "logic": "\nDecollete(morgen)\nAnalogue(morgen)\nMissing(ann)\nAllege(ann, morgen) -> Allege(morgen, ann)\nforall x (Allege(x, morgen) -> Shove(morgen, ann))\nforall x (Analogue(x) -> Allege(x, morgen))\nforall x (Missing(x) -> Lisp(x, morgen))\nforall x (Shove(x, ann) -> Shove(ann, morgen))\nforall x (Decollete(x) and Shove(x, morgen) -> Analogue(morgen))\n\nLisp(ann, ann)\n\nLisp(ann, ann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The neddie is anecdotal. The neddie is xlviii. The carlotta is lxvii. If the carlotta sail the neddie then the neddie sail the carlotta. If something sail the neddie then the neddie notarise the carlotta. If something is xlviii then it sail the neddie. If something is lxvii then it intonate the neddie. If something notarise the carlotta then the carlotta notarise the neddie. If something is anecdotal and it notarise the neddie then the neddie is xlviii. The carlotta does not like the carlotta.", "logic": "\nAnecdotal(neddie)\nXlviii(neddie)\nLxvii(carlotta)\nSail(carlotta, neddie) -> Sail(neddie, carlotta)\nforall x (Sail(x, neddie) -> Notarise(neddie, carlotta))\nforall x (Xlviii(x) -> Sail(x, neddie))\nforall x (Lxvii(x) -> Intonate(x, neddie))\nforall x (Notarise(x, carlotta) -> Notarise(carlotta, neddie))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) and Notarise(x, neddie) -> Xlviii(neddie))\n\nnot Sail(carlotta, carlotta)\n\nnot Sail(carlotta, carlotta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The jan is shorthand. The jan is blindfold. The wendeline is crookback. If the wendeline subluxate the jan then the jan subluxate the wendeline. If something subluxate the jan then the jan deepen the wendeline. If something is blindfold then it subluxate the jan. If something is crookback then it domicile the jan. If something deepen the wendeline then the wendeline deepen the jan. If something is shorthand and it deepen the jan then the jan is blindfold. The jan is green.", "logic": "\nShorthand(jan)\nBlindfold(jan)\nCrookback(wendeline)\nSubluxate(wendeline, jan) -> Subluxate(jan, wendeline)\nforall x (Subluxate(x, jan) -> Deepen(jan, wendeline))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) -> Subluxate(x, jan))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Domicile(x, jan))\nforall x (Deepen(x, wendeline) -> Deepen(wendeline, jan))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Deepen(x, jan) -> Blindfold(jan))\n\nGreen(jan)\n\nGreen(jan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The lucienne is bubbling. The lucienne is wanted. The pen is purging. If the pen ascend the lucienne then the lucienne ascend the pen. If something ascend the lucienne then the lucienne grieve the pen. If something is wanted then it ascend the lucienne. If something is purging then it wheedle the lucienne. If something grieve the pen then the pen grieve the lucienne. If something is bubbling and it grieve the lucienne then the lucienne is wanted. The pen does not visit the pen.", "logic": "\nBubbling(lucienne)\nWanted(lucienne)\nPurging(pen)\nAscend(pen, lucienne) -> Ascend(lucienne, pen)\nforall x (Ascend(x, lucienne) -> Grieve(lucienne, pen))\nforall x (Wanted(x) -> Ascend(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Wheedle(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Grieve(x, pen) -> Grieve(pen, lucienne))\nforall x (Bubbling(x) and Grieve(x, lucienne) -> Wanted(lucienne))\n\nnot Grieve(pen, pen)\n\nnot Grieve(pen, pen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The halley is neapolitan. The halley is binocular. The priscilla is takeout. If the priscilla grouse the halley then the halley grouse the priscilla. If something grouse the halley then the halley eternalize the priscilla. If something is binocular then it grouse the halley. If something is takeout then it file the halley. If something eternalize the priscilla then the priscilla eternalize the halley. If something is neapolitan and it eternalize the halley then the halley is binocular. The halley is takeout.", "logic": "\nNeapolitan(halley)\nBinocular(halley)\nTakeout(priscilla)\nGrouse(priscilla, halley) -> Grouse(halley, priscilla)\nforall x (Grouse(x, halley) -> Eternalize(halley, priscilla))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Grouse(x, halley))\nforall x (Takeout(x) -> File(x, halley))\nforall x (Eternalize(x, priscilla) -> Eternalize(priscilla, halley))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) and Eternalize(x, halley) -> Binocular(halley))\n\nTakeout(halley)\n\nTakeout(halley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The marnie shin the bellina. The marnie is salientian. The marnie is not paraguayan. The marnie is formulated. The marnie guffaw the bellina. The bellina shin the marnie. The bellina pounce the marnie. If someone is formulated and they visit the bellina then the bellina guffaw the marnie. If someone pounce the marnie and they are salientian then the marnie pounce the bellina. If someone shin the bellina then they visit the marnie. If someone guffaw the marnie and the marnie is malign then they visit the marnie. If the bellina is salientian and the bellina guffaw the marnie then the bellina pounce the marnie. If someone pounce the marnie then they are malign. If the marnie does not visit the bellina then the bellina is not wary. If someone shin the marnie and they do not see the marnie then they do not see the bellina. The bellina shin the marnie.", "logic": "\nShin(marnie, bellina)\nSalientian(marnie)\nnot Paraguayan(marnie)\nFormulated(marnie)\nGuffaw(marnie, bellina)\nShin(bellina, marnie)\nPounce(bellina, marnie)\nforall x (Formulated(x) and Pounce(x, bellina) -> Guffaw(bellina, marnie))\nforall x (Pounce(x, marnie) and Salientian(x) -> Pounce(marnie, bellina))\nforall x (Shin(x, bellina) -> Pounce(x, marnie))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, marnie) and Malign(marnie) -> Pounce(x, marnie))\nSalientian(bellina) and Guffaw(bellina, marnie) -> Pounce(bellina, marnie)\nforall x (Pounce(x, marnie) -> Malign(x))\nnot Pounce(marnie, bellina) -> not Wary(bellina)\nforall x (Shin(x, marnie) and not Guffaw(x, marnie) -> not Guffaw(x, bellina))\n\nShin(bellina, marnie)\n\ntherefore Shin(bellina, marnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The baillie pummel the wang. The baillie is lipotropic. The baillie is not malarial. The baillie is unexpired. The baillie solemnize the wang. The wang pummel the baillie. The wang fledge the baillie. If someone is unexpired and they visit the wang then the wang solemnize the baillie. If someone fledge the baillie and they are lipotropic then the baillie fledge the wang. If someone pummel the wang then they visit the baillie. If someone solemnize the baillie and the baillie is listless then they visit the baillie. If the wang is lipotropic and the wang solemnize the baillie then the wang fledge the baillie. If someone fledge the baillie then they are listless. If the baillie does not visit the wang then the wang is not fiduciary. If someone pummel the baillie and they do not see the baillie then they do not see the wang. The baillie is malarial.", "logic": "\nPummel(baillie, wang)\nLipotropic(baillie)\nnot Malarial(baillie)\nUnexpired(baillie)\nSolemnize(baillie, wang)\nPummel(wang, baillie)\nFledge(wang, baillie)\nforall x (Unexpired(x) and Fledge(x, wang) -> Solemnize(wang, baillie))\nforall x (Fledge(x, baillie) and Lipotropic(x) -> Fledge(baillie, wang))\nforall x (Pummel(x, wang) -> Fledge(x, baillie))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, baillie) and Listless(baillie) -> Fledge(x, baillie))\nLipotropic(wang) and Solemnize(wang, baillie) -> Fledge(wang, baillie)\nforall x (Fledge(x, baillie) -> Listless(x))\nnot Fledge(baillie, wang) -> not Fiduciary(wang)\nforall x (Pummel(x, baillie) and not Solemnize(x, baillie) -> not Solemnize(x, wang))\n\nMalarial(baillie)\n\ntherefore not Malarial(baillie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The ailey array the ulla. The ailey is warped. The ailey is not protozoan. The ailey is unbooked. The ailey cause the ulla. The ulla array the ailey. The ulla screw the ailey. If someone is unbooked and they visit the ulla then the ulla cause the ailey. If someone screw the ailey and they are warped then the ailey screw the ulla. If someone array the ulla then they visit the ailey. If someone cause the ailey and the ailey is incoming then they visit the ailey. If the ulla is warped and the ulla cause the ailey then the ulla screw the ailey. If someone screw the ailey then they are incoming. If the ailey does not visit the ulla then the ulla is not smoky. If someone array the ailey and they do not see the ailey then they do not see the ulla. The ailey screw the ailey.", "logic": "\nArray(ailey, ulla)\nWarped(ailey)\nnot Protozoan(ailey)\nUnbooked(ailey)\nCause(ailey, ulla)\nArray(ulla, ailey)\nScrew(ulla, ailey)\nforall x (Unbooked(x) and Screw(x, ulla) -> Cause(ulla, ailey))\nforall x (Screw(x, ailey) and Warped(x) -> Screw(ailey, ulla))\nforall x (Array(x, ulla) -> Screw(x, ailey))\nforall x (Cause(x, ailey) and Incoming(ailey) -> Screw(x, ailey))\nWarped(ulla) and Cause(ulla, ailey) -> Screw(ulla, ailey)\nforall x (Screw(x, ailey) -> Incoming(x))\nnot Screw(ailey, ulla) -> not Smoky(ulla)\nforall x (Array(x, ailey) and not Cause(x, ailey) -> not Cause(x, ulla))\n\nScrew(ailey, ailey)\n\nArray(ailey, ulla) and forall x (Array(x, ulla) -> Screw(x, ailey)) -> therefore Screw(ailey, ailey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The lonny value the roda. The lonny is stocky. The lonny is not prosthetic. The lonny is crumpled. The lonny brevet the roda. The roda value the lonny. The roda senesce the lonny. If someone is crumpled and they visit the roda then the roda brevet the lonny. If someone senesce the lonny and they are stocky then the lonny senesce the roda. If someone value the roda then they visit the lonny. If someone brevet the lonny and the lonny is erudite then they visit the lonny. If the roda is stocky and the roda brevet the lonny then the roda senesce the lonny. If someone senesce the lonny then they are erudite. If the lonny does not visit the roda then the roda is not turbulent. If someone value the lonny and they do not see the lonny then they do not see the roda. The lonny does not visit the lonny.", "logic": "\nValue(lonny, roda)\nStocky(lonny)\nnot Prosthetic(lonny)\nCrumpled(lonny)\nBrevet(lonny, roda)\nValue(roda, lonny)\nSenesce(roda, lonny)\nforall x (Crumpled(x) and Senesce(x, roda) -> Brevet(roda, lonny))\nforall x (Senesce(x, lonny) and Stocky(x) -> Senesce(lonny, roda))\nforall x (Value(x, roda) -> Senesce(x, lonny))\nforall x (Brevet(x, lonny) and Erudite(lonny) -> Senesce(x, lonny))\nStocky(roda) and Brevet(roda, lonny) -> Senesce(roda, lonny)\nforall x (Senesce(x, lonny) -> Erudite(x))\nnot Senesce(lonny, roda) -> not Turbulent(roda)\nforall x (Value(x, lonny) and not Brevet(x, lonny) -> not Brevet(x, roda))\n\nnot Senesce(lonny, lonny)\n\nValue(lonny, roda) and forall x (Value(x, roda) -> Senesce(x, lonny)) -> therefore Senesce(lonny, lonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The aleecia inweave the nancee. The aleecia is fresh. The aleecia is not smooth. The aleecia is stopped. The aleecia deign the nancee. The nancee inweave the aleecia. The nancee construct the aleecia. If someone is stopped and they visit the nancee then the nancee deign the aleecia. If someone construct the aleecia and they are fresh then the aleecia construct the nancee. If someone inweave the nancee then they visit the aleecia. If someone deign the aleecia and the aleecia is diluvial then they visit the aleecia. If the nancee is fresh and the nancee deign the aleecia then the nancee construct the aleecia. If someone construct the aleecia then they are diluvial. If the aleecia does not visit the nancee then the nancee is not cusped. If someone inweave the aleecia and they do not see the aleecia then they do not see the nancee. The aleecia construct the nancee.", "logic": "\nInweave(aleecia, nancee)\nFresh(aleecia)\nnot Smooth(aleecia)\nStopped(aleecia)\nDeign(aleecia, nancee)\nInweave(nancee, aleecia)\nConstruct(nancee, aleecia)\nforall x (Stopped(x) and Construct(x, nancee) -> Deign(nancee, aleecia))\nforall x (Construct(x, aleecia) and Fresh(x) -> Construct(aleecia, nancee))\nforall x (Inweave(x, nancee) -> Construct(x, aleecia))\nforall x (Deign(x, aleecia) and Diluvial(aleecia) -> Construct(x, aleecia))\nFresh(nancee) and Deign(nancee, aleecia) -> Construct(nancee, aleecia)\nforall x (Construct(x, aleecia) -> Diluvial(x))\nnot Construct(aleecia, nancee) -> not Cusped(nancee)\nforall x (Inweave(x, aleecia) and not Deign(x, aleecia) -> not Deign(x, nancee))\n\nConstruct(aleecia, nancee)\n\nInweave(aleecia, nancee) and forall x (Inweave(x, nancee) -> Construct(x, aleecia)) -> therefore Construct(aleecia, aleecia) Construct(aleecia, aleecia) and Fresh(aleecia) and forall x (Construct(x, aleecia) and Fresh(x) -> Construct(aleecia, nancee)) -> therefore Construct(aleecia, nancee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The juline core the titos. The juline is rearing. The juline is not czech. The juline is average. The juline reprehend the titos. The titos core the juline. The titos chirp the juline. If someone is average and they visit the titos then the titos reprehend the juline. If someone chirp the juline and they are rearing then the juline chirp the titos. If someone core the titos then they visit the juline. If someone reprehend the juline and the juline is nubile then they visit the juline. If the titos is rearing and the titos reprehend the juline then the titos chirp the juline. If someone chirp the juline then they are nubile. If the juline does not visit the titos then the titos is not placable. If someone core the juline and they do not see the juline then they do not see the titos. The juline is not nubile.", "logic": "\nCore(juline, titos)\nRearing(juline)\nnot Czech(juline)\nAverage(juline)\nReprehend(juline, titos)\nCore(titos, juline)\nChirp(titos, juline)\nforall x (Average(x) and Chirp(x, titos) -> Reprehend(titos, juline))\nforall x (Chirp(x, juline) and Rearing(x) -> Chirp(juline, titos))\nforall x (Core(x, titos) -> Chirp(x, juline))\nforall x (Reprehend(x, juline) and Nubile(juline) -> Chirp(x, juline))\nRearing(titos) and Reprehend(titos, juline) -> Chirp(titos, juline)\nforall x (Chirp(x, juline) -> Nubile(x))\nnot Chirp(juline, titos) -> not Placable(titos)\nforall x (Core(x, juline) and not Reprehend(x, juline) -> not Reprehend(x, titos))\n\nnot Nubile(juline)\n\nCore(juline, titos) and forall x (Core(x, titos) -> Chirp(x, juline)) -> therefore Chirp(juline, juline) Chirp(juline, juline) and forall x (Chirp(x, juline) -> Nubile(x)) -> therefore Nubile(juline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The odelle scout the danella. The odelle is transonic. The odelle is not pudgy. The odelle is pestilent. The odelle overfeed the danella. The danella scout the odelle. The danella handle the odelle. If someone is pestilent and they visit the danella then the danella overfeed the odelle. If someone handle the odelle and they are transonic then the odelle handle the danella. If someone scout the danella then they visit the odelle. If someone overfeed the odelle and the odelle is watchful then they visit the odelle. If the danella is transonic and the danella overfeed the odelle then the danella handle the odelle. If someone handle the odelle then they are watchful. If the odelle does not visit the danella then the danella is not popular. If someone scout the odelle and they do not see the odelle then they do not see the danella. The danella overfeed the odelle.", "logic": "\nScout(odelle, danella)\nTransonic(odelle)\nnot Pudgy(odelle)\nPestilent(odelle)\nOverfeed(odelle, danella)\nScout(danella, odelle)\nHandle(danella, odelle)\nforall x (Pestilent(x) and Handle(x, danella) -> Overfeed(danella, odelle))\nforall x (Handle(x, odelle) and Transonic(x) -> Handle(odelle, danella))\nforall x (Scout(x, danella) -> Handle(x, odelle))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, odelle) and Watchful(odelle) -> Handle(x, odelle))\nTransonic(danella) and Overfeed(danella, odelle) -> Handle(danella, odelle)\nforall x (Handle(x, odelle) -> Watchful(x))\nnot Handle(odelle, danella) -> not Popular(danella)\nforall x (Scout(x, odelle) and not Overfeed(x, odelle) -> not Overfeed(x, danella))\n\nOverfeed(danella, odelle)\n\nScout(odelle, danella) and forall x (Scout(x, danella) -> Handle(x, odelle)) -> therefore Handle(odelle, odelle) Handle(odelle, odelle) and Transonic(odelle) and forall x (Handle(x, odelle) and Transonic(x) -> Handle(odelle, danella)) -> therefore Handle(odelle, danella) Pestilent(odelle) and Handle(odelle, danella) and forall x (Pestilent(x) and Handle(x, danella) -> Overfeed(danella, odelle)) -> therefore Overfeed(danella, odelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The durward stonewall the lilah. The durward is bubaline. The durward is not anxious. The durward is wakeless. The durward proceed the lilah. The lilah stonewall the durward. The lilah delimit the durward. If someone is wakeless and they visit the lilah then the lilah proceed the durward. If someone delimit the durward and they are bubaline then the durward delimit the lilah. If someone stonewall the lilah then they visit the durward. If someone proceed the durward and the durward is corporate then they visit the durward. If the lilah is bubaline and the lilah proceed the durward then the lilah delimit the durward. If someone delimit the durward then they are corporate. If the durward does not visit the lilah then the lilah is not lxxxvii. If someone stonewall the durward and they do not see the durward then they do not see the lilah. The lilah does not see the durward.", "logic": "\nStonewall(durward, lilah)\nBubaline(durward)\nnot Anxious(durward)\nWakeless(durward)\nProceed(durward, lilah)\nStonewall(lilah, durward)\nDelimit(lilah, durward)\nforall x (Wakeless(x) and Delimit(x, lilah) -> Proceed(lilah, durward))\nforall x (Delimit(x, durward) and Bubaline(x) -> Delimit(durward, lilah))\nforall x (Stonewall(x, lilah) -> Delimit(x, durward))\nforall x (Proceed(x, durward) and Corporate(durward) -> Delimit(x, durward))\nBubaline(lilah) and Proceed(lilah, durward) -> Delimit(lilah, durward)\nforall x (Delimit(x, durward) -> Corporate(x))\nnot Delimit(durward, lilah) -> not Lxxxvii(lilah)\nforall x (Stonewall(x, durward) and not Proceed(x, durward) -> not Proceed(x, lilah))\n\nnot Proceed(lilah, durward)\n\nStonewall(durward, lilah) and forall x (Stonewall(x, lilah) -> Delimit(x, durward)) -> therefore Delimit(durward, durward) Delimit(durward, durward) and Bubaline(durward) and forall x (Delimit(x, durward) and Bubaline(x) -> Delimit(durward, lilah)) -> therefore Delimit(durward, lilah) Wakeless(durward) and Delimit(durward, lilah) and forall x (Wakeless(x) and Delimit(x, lilah) -> Proceed(lilah, durward)) -> therefore Proceed(lilah, durward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The udall pyramid the marybelle. The udall is appetent. The udall is not womanlike. The udall is stative. The udall taxi the marybelle. The marybelle pyramid the udall. The marybelle notify the udall. If someone is stative and they visit the marybelle then the marybelle taxi the udall. If someone notify the udall and they are appetent then the udall notify the marybelle. If someone pyramid the marybelle then they visit the udall. If someone taxi the udall and the udall is ebionite then they visit the udall. If the marybelle is appetent and the marybelle taxi the udall then the marybelle notify the udall. If someone notify the udall then they are ebionite. If the udall does not visit the marybelle then the marybelle is not tunisian. If someone pyramid the udall and they do not see the udall then they do not see the marybelle. The udall does not see the udall.", "logic": "\nPyramid(udall, marybelle)\nAppetent(udall)\nnot Womanlike(udall)\nStative(udall)\nTaxi(udall, marybelle)\nPyramid(marybelle, udall)\nNotify(marybelle, udall)\nforall x (Stative(x) and Notify(x, marybelle) -> Taxi(marybelle, udall))\nforall x (Notify(x, udall) and Appetent(x) -> Notify(udall, marybelle))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, marybelle) -> Notify(x, udall))\nforall x (Taxi(x, udall) and Ebionite(udall) -> Notify(x, udall))\nAppetent(marybelle) and Taxi(marybelle, udall) -> Notify(marybelle, udall)\nforall x (Notify(x, udall) -> Ebionite(x))\nnot Notify(udall, marybelle) -> not Tunisian(marybelle)\nforall x (Pyramid(x, udall) and not Taxi(x, udall) -> not Taxi(x, marybelle))\n\nnot Taxi(udall, udall)\n\nnot Taxi(udall, udall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The allie cheese the hamel. The allie is isocyclic. The allie is not granulose. The allie is rhomboid. The allie shortlist the hamel. The hamel cheese the allie. The hamel pique the allie. If someone is rhomboid and they visit the hamel then the hamel shortlist the allie. If someone pique the allie and they are isocyclic then the allie pique the hamel. If someone cheese the hamel then they visit the allie. If someone shortlist the allie and the allie is dreamed then they visit the allie. If the hamel is isocyclic and the hamel shortlist the allie then the hamel pique the allie. If someone pique the allie then they are dreamed. If the allie does not visit the hamel then the hamel is not insouciant. If someone cheese the allie and they do not see the allie then they do not see the hamel. The allie cheese the allie.", "logic": "\nCheese(allie, hamel)\nIsocyclic(allie)\nnot Granulose(allie)\nRhomboid(allie)\nShortlist(allie, hamel)\nCheese(hamel, allie)\nPique(hamel, allie)\nforall x (Rhomboid(x) and Pique(x, hamel) -> Shortlist(hamel, allie))\nforall x (Pique(x, allie) and Isocyclic(x) -> Pique(allie, hamel))\nforall x (Cheese(x, hamel) -> Pique(x, allie))\nforall x (Shortlist(x, allie) and Dreamed(allie) -> Pique(x, allie))\nIsocyclic(hamel) and Shortlist(hamel, allie) -> Pique(hamel, allie)\nforall x (Pique(x, allie) -> Dreamed(x))\nnot Pique(allie, hamel) -> not Insouciant(hamel)\nforall x (Cheese(x, allie) and not Shortlist(x, allie) -> not Shortlist(x, hamel))\n\nCheese(allie, allie)\n\nCheese(allie, allie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The chastity roost the edyth. The chastity is aoristic. The chastity is not neonatal. The chastity is gracile. The chastity french the edyth. The edyth roost the chastity. The edyth endorse the chastity. If someone is gracile and they visit the edyth then the edyth french the chastity. If someone endorse the chastity and they are aoristic then the chastity endorse the edyth. If someone roost the edyth then they visit the chastity. If someone french the chastity and the chastity is muzzy then they visit the chastity. If the edyth is aoristic and the edyth french the chastity then the edyth endorse the chastity. If someone endorse the chastity then they are muzzy. If the chastity does not visit the edyth then the edyth is not exuvial. If someone roost the chastity and they do not see the chastity then they do not see the edyth. The edyth is not exuvial.", "logic": "\nRoost(chastity, edyth)\nAoristic(chastity)\nnot Neonatal(chastity)\nGracile(chastity)\nFrench(chastity, edyth)\nRoost(edyth, chastity)\nEndorse(edyth, chastity)\nforall x (Gracile(x) and Endorse(x, edyth) -> French(edyth, chastity))\nforall x (Endorse(x, chastity) and Aoristic(x) -> Endorse(chastity, edyth))\nforall x (Roost(x, edyth) -> Endorse(x, chastity))\nforall x (French(x, chastity) and Muzzy(chastity) -> Endorse(x, chastity))\nAoristic(edyth) and French(edyth, chastity) -> Endorse(edyth, chastity)\nforall x (Endorse(x, chastity) -> Muzzy(x))\nnot Endorse(chastity, edyth) -> not Exuvial(edyth)\nforall x (Roost(x, chastity) and not French(x, chastity) -> not French(x, edyth))\n\nnot Exuvial(edyth)\n\nnot Exuvial(edyth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The karrie junketeer the bernadene. The karrie is shavian. The karrie is not humanlike. The karrie is elect. The karrie farce the bernadene. The bernadene junketeer the karrie. The bernadene prepossess the karrie. If someone is elect and they visit the bernadene then the bernadene farce the karrie. If someone prepossess the karrie and they are shavian then the karrie prepossess the bernadene. If someone junketeer the bernadene then they visit the karrie. If someone farce the karrie and the karrie is piquant then they visit the karrie. If the bernadene is shavian and the bernadene farce the karrie then the bernadene prepossess the karrie. If someone prepossess the karrie then they are piquant. If the karrie does not visit the bernadene then the bernadene is not sectarian. If someone junketeer the karrie and they do not see the karrie then they do not see the bernadene. The bernadene junketeer the bernadene.", "logic": "\nJunketeer(karrie, bernadene)\nShavian(karrie)\nnot Humanlike(karrie)\nElect(karrie)\nFarce(karrie, bernadene)\nJunketeer(bernadene, karrie)\nPrepossess(bernadene, karrie)\nforall x (Elect(x) and Prepossess(x, bernadene) -> Farce(bernadene, karrie))\nforall x (Prepossess(x, karrie) and Shavian(x) -> Prepossess(karrie, bernadene))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, bernadene) -> Prepossess(x, karrie))\nforall x (Farce(x, karrie) and Piquant(karrie) -> Prepossess(x, karrie))\nShavian(bernadene) and Farce(bernadene, karrie) -> Prepossess(bernadene, karrie)\nforall x (Prepossess(x, karrie) -> Piquant(x))\nnot Prepossess(karrie, bernadene) -> not Sectarian(bernadene)\nforall x (Junketeer(x, karrie) and not Farce(x, karrie) -> not Farce(x, bernadene))\n\nJunketeer(bernadene, bernadene)\n\nJunketeer(bernadene, bernadene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The shelly crusade the daisy. The shelly is synthetic. The shelly is not aphetic. The shelly is seeping. The shelly conglobe the daisy. The daisy crusade the shelly. The daisy fall the shelly. If someone is seeping and they visit the daisy then the daisy conglobe the shelly. If someone fall the shelly and they are synthetic then the shelly fall the daisy. If someone crusade the daisy then they visit the shelly. If someone conglobe the shelly and the shelly is formative then they visit the shelly. If the daisy is synthetic and the daisy conglobe the shelly then the daisy fall the shelly. If someone fall the shelly then they are formative. If the shelly does not visit the daisy then the daisy is not implacable. If someone crusade the shelly and they do not see the shelly then they do not see the daisy. The daisy is not aphetic.", "logic": "\nCrusade(shelly, daisy)\nSynthetic(shelly)\nnot Aphetic(shelly)\nSeeping(shelly)\nConglobe(shelly, daisy)\nCrusade(daisy, shelly)\nFall(daisy, shelly)\nforall x (Seeping(x) and Fall(x, daisy) -> Conglobe(daisy, shelly))\nforall x (Fall(x, shelly) and Synthetic(x) -> Fall(shelly, daisy))\nforall x (Crusade(x, daisy) -> Fall(x, shelly))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, shelly) and Formative(shelly) -> Fall(x, shelly))\nSynthetic(daisy) and Conglobe(daisy, shelly) -> Fall(daisy, shelly)\nforall x (Fall(x, shelly) -> Formative(x))\nnot Fall(shelly, daisy) -> not Implacable(daisy)\nforall x (Crusade(x, shelly) and not Conglobe(x, shelly) -> not Conglobe(x, daisy))\n\nnot Aphetic(daisy)\n\nnot Aphetic(daisy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The kata maul the rebeka. The kata is helical. The kata is not scrivened. The kata is mordant. The kata palpate the rebeka. The rebeka maul the kata. The rebeka supple the kata. If someone is mordant and they visit the rebeka then the rebeka palpate the kata. If someone supple the kata and they are helical then the kata supple the rebeka. If someone maul the rebeka then they visit the kata. If someone palpate the kata and the kata is iconic then they visit the kata. If the rebeka is helical and the rebeka palpate the kata then the rebeka supple the kata. If someone supple the kata then they are iconic. If the kata does not visit the rebeka then the rebeka is not lancinate. If someone maul the kata and they do not see the kata then they do not see the rebeka. The rebeka is helical.", "logic": "\nMaul(kata, rebeka)\nHelical(kata)\nnot Scrivened(kata)\nMordant(kata)\nPalpate(kata, rebeka)\nMaul(rebeka, kata)\nSupple(rebeka, kata)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Supple(x, rebeka) -> Palpate(rebeka, kata))\nforall x (Supple(x, kata) and Helical(x) -> Supple(kata, rebeka))\nforall x (Maul(x, rebeka) -> Supple(x, kata))\nforall x (Palpate(x, kata) and Iconic(kata) -> Supple(x, kata))\nHelical(rebeka) and Palpate(rebeka, kata) -> Supple(rebeka, kata)\nforall x (Supple(x, kata) -> Iconic(x))\nnot Supple(kata, rebeka) -> not Lancinate(rebeka)\nforall x (Maul(x, kata) and not Palpate(x, kata) -> not Palpate(x, rebeka))\n\nHelical(rebeka)\n\nHelical(rebeka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The barri ferret the francisco. The barri is semiannual. The barri is not motile. The barri is pernickety. The barri hydrolize the francisco. The francisco ferret the barri. The francisco rejoin the barri. If someone is pernickety and they visit the francisco then the francisco hydrolize the barri. If someone rejoin the barri and they are semiannual then the barri rejoin the francisco. If someone ferret the francisco then they visit the barri. If someone hydrolize the barri and the barri is rhinal then they visit the barri. If the francisco is semiannual and the francisco hydrolize the barri then the francisco rejoin the barri. If someone rejoin the barri then they are rhinal. If the barri does not visit the francisco then the francisco is not saprobic. If someone ferret the barri and they do not see the barri then they do not see the francisco. The barri is not saprobic.", "logic": "\nFerret(barri, francisco)\nSemiannual(barri)\nnot Motile(barri)\nPernickety(barri)\nHydrolize(barri, francisco)\nFerret(francisco, barri)\nRejoin(francisco, barri)\nforall x (Pernickety(x) and Rejoin(x, francisco) -> Hydrolize(francisco, barri))\nforall x (Rejoin(x, barri) and Semiannual(x) -> Rejoin(barri, francisco))\nforall x (Ferret(x, francisco) -> Rejoin(x, barri))\nforall x (Hydrolize(x, barri) and Rhinal(barri) -> Rejoin(x, barri))\nSemiannual(francisco) and Hydrolize(francisco, barri) -> Rejoin(francisco, barri)\nforall x (Rejoin(x, barri) -> Rhinal(x))\nnot Rejoin(barri, francisco) -> not Saprobic(francisco)\nforall x (Ferret(x, barri) and not Hydrolize(x, barri) -> not Hydrolize(x, francisco))\n\nnot Saprobic(barri)\n\nnot Saprobic(barri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The gustave corduroy the adam. The gustave is meningeal. The gustave is not scrupulous. The gustave is cursive. The gustave develop the adam. The adam corduroy the gustave. The adam harden the gustave. If someone is cursive and they visit the adam then the adam develop the gustave. If someone harden the gustave and they are meningeal then the gustave harden the adam. If someone corduroy the adam then they visit the gustave. If someone develop the gustave and the gustave is cyprinid then they visit the gustave. If the adam is meningeal and the adam develop the gustave then the adam harden the gustave. If someone harden the gustave then they are cyprinid. If the gustave does not visit the adam then the adam is not sonsie. If someone corduroy the gustave and they do not see the gustave then they do not see the adam. The adam develop the adam.", "logic": "\nCorduroy(gustave, adam)\nMeningeal(gustave)\nnot Scrupulous(gustave)\nCursive(gustave)\nDevelop(gustave, adam)\nCorduroy(adam, gustave)\nHarden(adam, gustave)\nforall x (Cursive(x) and Harden(x, adam) -> Develop(adam, gustave))\nforall x (Harden(x, gustave) and Meningeal(x) -> Harden(gustave, adam))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, adam) -> Harden(x, gustave))\nforall x (Develop(x, gustave) and Cyprinid(gustave) -> Harden(x, gustave))\nMeningeal(adam) and Develop(adam, gustave) -> Harden(adam, gustave)\nforall x (Harden(x, gustave) -> Cyprinid(x))\nnot Harden(gustave, adam) -> not Sonsie(adam)\nforall x (Corduroy(x, gustave) and not Develop(x, gustave) -> not Develop(x, adam))\n\nDevelop(adam, adam)\n\nDevelop(adam, adam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The ike mismanage the gussy. The lethia dimple the ike. The ferdy vivisect the ike. The gussy is worldwide. If someone vivisect the ike then they see the gussy. If someone mismanage the ferdy then the ferdy is enigmatic. If someone is enigmatic and they see the lethia then the lethia is coupled. If someone mismanage the ike then the ike mismanage the lethia. If someone vivisect the gussy and the gussy mismanage the lethia then the lethia mismanage the ike. If someone dimple the gussy then the gussy is lamplit. If someone is lamplit then they eat the gussy. If someone vivisect the lethia and they like the ike then they are lamplit. The ike mismanage the gussy.", "logic": "\nMismanage(ike, gussy)\nDimple(lethia, ike)\nVivisect(ferdy, ike)\nWorldwide(gussy)\nforall x (Vivisect(x, ike) -> Dimple(x, gussy))\nforall x (Mismanage(x, ferdy) -> Enigmatic(ferdy))\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) and Dimple(x, lethia) -> Coupled(lethia))\nforall x (Mismanage(x, ike) -> Mismanage(ike, lethia))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, gussy) and Mismanage(gussy, lethia) -> Mismanage(lethia, ike))\nforall x (Dimple(x, gussy) -> Lamplit(gussy))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> Mismanage(x, gussy))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, lethia) and Vivisect(x, ike) -> Lamplit(x))\n\nMismanage(ike, gussy)\n\ntherefore Mismanage(ike, gussy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The emilio stroll the oprah. The linoel retard the emilio. The townie iodise the emilio. The oprah is viewable. If someone iodise the emilio then they see the oprah. If someone stroll the townie then the townie is reverse. If someone is reverse and they see the linoel then the linoel is quaternary. If someone stroll the emilio then the emilio stroll the linoel. If someone iodise the oprah and the oprah stroll the linoel then the linoel stroll the emilio. If someone retard the oprah then the oprah is employed. If someone is employed then they eat the oprah. If someone iodise the linoel and they like the emilio then they are employed. The emilio does not eat the oprah.", "logic": "\nStroll(emilio, oprah)\nRetard(linoel, emilio)\nIodise(townie, emilio)\nViewable(oprah)\nforall x (Iodise(x, emilio) -> Retard(x, oprah))\nforall x (Stroll(x, townie) -> Reverse(townie))\nforall x (Reverse(x) and Retard(x, linoel) -> Quaternary(linoel))\nforall x (Stroll(x, emilio) -> Stroll(emilio, linoel))\nforall x (Iodise(x, oprah) and Stroll(oprah, linoel) -> Stroll(linoel, emilio))\nforall x (Retard(x, oprah) -> Employed(oprah))\nforall x (Employed(x) -> Stroll(x, oprah))\nforall x (Iodise(x, linoel) and Iodise(x, emilio) -> Employed(x))\n\nnot Stroll(emilio, oprah)\n\ntherefore Stroll(emilio, oprah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The ernst envelop the gustav. The evelyn replenish the ernst. The christie symmetrize the ernst. The gustav is high. If someone symmetrize the ernst then they see the gustav. If someone envelop the christie then the christie is lipped. If someone is lipped and they see the evelyn then the evelyn is addible. If someone envelop the ernst then the ernst envelop the evelyn. If someone symmetrize the gustav and the gustav envelop the evelyn then the evelyn envelop the ernst. If someone replenish the gustav then the gustav is queer. If someone is queer then they eat the gustav. If someone symmetrize the evelyn and they like the ernst then they are queer. The christie replenish the gustav.", "logic": "\nEnvelop(ernst, gustav)\nReplenish(evelyn, ernst)\nSymmetrize(christie, ernst)\nHigh(gustav)\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, ernst) -> Replenish(x, gustav))\nforall x (Envelop(x, christie) -> Lipped(christie))\nforall x (Lipped(x) and Replenish(x, evelyn) -> Addible(evelyn))\nforall x (Envelop(x, ernst) -> Envelop(ernst, evelyn))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, gustav) and Envelop(gustav, evelyn) -> Envelop(evelyn, ernst))\nforall x (Replenish(x, gustav) -> Queer(gustav))\nforall x (Queer(x) -> Envelop(x, gustav))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, evelyn) and Symmetrize(x, ernst) -> Queer(x))\n\nReplenish(christie, gustav)\n\nSymmetrize(christie, ernst) and forall x (Symmetrize(x, ernst) -> Replenish(x, gustav)) -> therefore Replenish(christie, gustav)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The aloise interpose the mathilda. The melody excrete the aloise. The michele isomerize the aloise. The mathilda is wicked. If someone isomerize the aloise then they see the mathilda. If someone interpose the michele then the michele is ammoniac. If someone is ammoniac and they see the melody then the melody is injured. If someone interpose the aloise then the aloise interpose the melody. If someone isomerize the mathilda and the mathilda interpose the melody then the melody interpose the aloise. If someone excrete the mathilda then the mathilda is indocile. If someone is indocile then they eat the mathilda. If someone isomerize the melody and they like the aloise then they are indocile. The michele does not see the mathilda.", "logic": "\nInterpose(aloise, mathilda)\nExcrete(melody, aloise)\nIsomerize(michele, aloise)\nWicked(mathilda)\nforall x (Isomerize(x, aloise) -> Excrete(x, mathilda))\nforall x (Interpose(x, michele) -> Ammoniac(michele))\nforall x (Ammoniac(x) and Excrete(x, melody) -> Injured(melody))\nforall x (Interpose(x, aloise) -> Interpose(aloise, melody))\nforall x (Isomerize(x, mathilda) and Interpose(mathilda, melody) -> Interpose(melody, aloise))\nforall x (Excrete(x, mathilda) -> Indocile(mathilda))\nforall x (Indocile(x) -> Interpose(x, mathilda))\nforall x (Isomerize(x, melody) and Isomerize(x, aloise) -> Indocile(x))\n\nnot Excrete(michele, mathilda)\n\nIsomerize(michele, aloise) and forall x (Isomerize(x, aloise) -> Excrete(x, mathilda)) -> therefore Excrete(michele, mathilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The patience inveigle the marko. The cornelle damp the patience. The fern preheat the patience. The marko is vertical. If someone preheat the patience then they see the marko. If someone inveigle the fern then the fern is unbleached. If someone is unbleached and they see the cornelle then the cornelle is cubital. If someone inveigle the patience then the patience inveigle the cornelle. If someone preheat the marko and the marko inveigle the cornelle then the cornelle inveigle the patience. If someone damp the marko then the marko is scrabbly. If someone is scrabbly then they eat the marko. If someone preheat the cornelle and they like the patience then they are scrabbly. The marko is scrabbly.", "logic": "\nInveigle(patience, marko)\nDamp(cornelle, patience)\nPreheat(fern, patience)\nVertical(marko)\nforall x (Preheat(x, patience) -> Damp(x, marko))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, fern) -> Unbleached(fern))\nforall x (Unbleached(x) and Damp(x, cornelle) -> Cubital(cornelle))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, patience) -> Inveigle(patience, cornelle))\nforall x (Preheat(x, marko) and Inveigle(marko, cornelle) -> Inveigle(cornelle, patience))\nforall x (Damp(x, marko) -> Scrabbly(marko))\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) -> Inveigle(x, marko))\nforall x (Preheat(x, cornelle) and Preheat(x, patience) -> Scrabbly(x))\n\nScrabbly(marko)\n\nPreheat(fern, patience) and forall x (Preheat(x, patience) -> Damp(x, marko)) -> therefore Damp(fern, marko) Damp(fern, marko) and forall x (Damp(x, marko) -> Scrabbly(marko)) -> therefore Scrabbly(marko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The gabrila crease the gerladina. The lynnell prevent the gabrila. The rosabel rave the gabrila. The gerladina is limbic. If someone rave the gabrila then they see the gerladina. If someone crease the rosabel then the rosabel is corrugated. If someone is corrugated and they see the lynnell then the lynnell is unswept. If someone crease the gabrila then the gabrila crease the lynnell. If someone rave the gerladina and the gerladina crease the lynnell then the lynnell crease the gabrila. If someone prevent the gerladina then the gerladina is urban. If someone is urban then they eat the gerladina. If someone rave the lynnell and they like the gabrila then they are urban. The gerladina is not urban.", "logic": "\nCrease(gabrila, gerladina)\nPrevent(lynnell, gabrila)\nRave(rosabel, gabrila)\nLimbic(gerladina)\nforall x (Rave(x, gabrila) -> Prevent(x, gerladina))\nforall x (Crease(x, rosabel) -> Corrugated(rosabel))\nforall x (Corrugated(x) and Prevent(x, lynnell) -> Unswept(lynnell))\nforall x (Crease(x, gabrila) -> Crease(gabrila, lynnell))\nforall x (Rave(x, gerladina) and Crease(gerladina, lynnell) -> Crease(lynnell, gabrila))\nforall x (Prevent(x, gerladina) -> Urban(gerladina))\nforall x (Urban(x) -> Crease(x, gerladina))\nforall x (Rave(x, lynnell) and Rave(x, gabrila) -> Urban(x))\n\nnot Urban(gerladina)\n\nRave(rosabel, gabrila) and forall x (Rave(x, gabrila) -> Prevent(x, gerladina)) -> therefore Prevent(rosabel, gerladina) Prevent(rosabel, gerladina) and forall x (Prevent(x, gerladina) -> Urban(gerladina)) -> therefore Urban(gerladina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The selinda oxidise the ramon. The caria luxate the selinda. The jeanne tango the selinda. The ramon is mediaeval. If someone tango the selinda then they see the ramon. If someone oxidise the jeanne then the jeanne is unhurt. If someone is unhurt and they see the caria then the caria is fiduciary. If someone oxidise the selinda then the selinda oxidise the caria. If someone tango the ramon and the ramon oxidise the caria then the caria oxidise the selinda. If someone luxate the ramon then the ramon is italic. If someone is italic then they eat the ramon. If someone tango the caria and they like the selinda then they are italic. The ramon oxidise the ramon.", "logic": "\nOxidise(selinda, ramon)\nLuxate(caria, selinda)\nTango(jeanne, selinda)\nMediaeval(ramon)\nforall x (Tango(x, selinda) -> Luxate(x, ramon))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, jeanne) -> Unhurt(jeanne))\nforall x (Unhurt(x) and Luxate(x, caria) -> Fiduciary(caria))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, selinda) -> Oxidise(selinda, caria))\nforall x (Tango(x, ramon) and Oxidise(ramon, caria) -> Oxidise(caria, selinda))\nforall x (Luxate(x, ramon) -> Italic(ramon))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Oxidise(x, ramon))\nforall x (Tango(x, caria) and Tango(x, selinda) -> Italic(x))\n\nOxidise(ramon, ramon)\n\nTango(jeanne, selinda) and forall x (Tango(x, selinda) -> Luxate(x, ramon)) -> therefore Luxate(jeanne, ramon) Luxate(jeanne, ramon) and forall x (Luxate(x, ramon) -> Italic(ramon)) -> therefore Italic(ramon) Italic(ramon) and forall x (Italic(x) -> Oxidise(x, ramon)) -> therefore Oxidise(ramon, ramon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The shaylynn recumb the alane. The sully annihilate the shaylynn. The brigitte join the shaylynn. The alane is engaging. If someone join the shaylynn then they see the alane. If someone recumb the brigitte then the brigitte is regimented. If someone is regimented and they see the sully then the sully is yellowed. If someone recumb the shaylynn then the shaylynn recumb the sully. If someone join the alane and the alane recumb the sully then the sully recumb the shaylynn. If someone annihilate the alane then the alane is unmated. If someone is unmated then they eat the alane. If someone join the sully and they like the shaylynn then they are unmated. The alane does not eat the alane.", "logic": "\nRecumb(shaylynn, alane)\nAnnihilate(sully, shaylynn)\nJoin(brigitte, shaylynn)\nEngaging(alane)\nforall x (Join(x, shaylynn) -> Annihilate(x, alane))\nforall x (Recumb(x, brigitte) -> Regimented(brigitte))\nforall x (Regimented(x) and Annihilate(x, sully) -> Yellowed(sully))\nforall x (Recumb(x, shaylynn) -> Recumb(shaylynn, sully))\nforall x (Join(x, alane) and Recumb(alane, sully) -> Recumb(sully, shaylynn))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, alane) -> Unmated(alane))\nforall x (Unmated(x) -> Recumb(x, alane))\nforall x (Join(x, sully) and Join(x, shaylynn) -> Unmated(x))\n\nnot Recumb(alane, alane)\n\nJoin(brigitte, shaylynn) and forall x (Join(x, shaylynn) -> Annihilate(x, alane)) -> therefore Annihilate(brigitte, alane) Annihilate(brigitte, alane) and forall x (Annihilate(x, alane) -> Unmated(alane)) -> therefore Unmated(alane) Unmated(alane) and forall x (Unmated(x) -> Recumb(x, alane)) -> therefore Recumb(alane, alane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The elmer triumph the kippy. The rona annex the elmer. The tiff piggyback the elmer. The kippy is eighty. If someone piggyback the elmer then they see the kippy. If someone triumph the tiff then the tiff is masterful. If someone is masterful and they see the rona then the rona is hazy. If someone triumph the elmer then the elmer triumph the rona. If someone piggyback the kippy and the kippy triumph the rona then the rona triumph the elmer. If someone annex the kippy then the kippy is miffed. If someone is miffed then they eat the kippy. If someone piggyback the rona and they like the elmer then they are miffed. The kippy does not see the kippy.", "logic": "\nTriumph(elmer, kippy)\nAnnex(rona, elmer)\nPiggyback(tiff, elmer)\nEighty(kippy)\nforall x (Piggyback(x, elmer) -> Annex(x, kippy))\nforall x (Triumph(x, tiff) -> Masterful(tiff))\nforall x (Masterful(x) and Annex(x, rona) -> Hazy(rona))\nforall x (Triumph(x, elmer) -> Triumph(elmer, rona))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, kippy) and Triumph(kippy, rona) -> Triumph(rona, elmer))\nforall x (Annex(x, kippy) -> Miffed(kippy))\nforall x (Miffed(x) -> Triumph(x, kippy))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, rona) and Piggyback(x, elmer) -> Miffed(x))\n\nnot Annex(kippy, kippy)\n\nforall x (Piggyback(x, elmer) -> Annex(x, kippy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The claribel constipate the elysia. The alaine conduce the claribel. The munroe ballyhoo the claribel. The elysia is ebracteate. If someone ballyhoo the claribel then they see the elysia. If someone constipate the munroe then the munroe is favorable. If someone is favorable and they see the alaine then the alaine is modern. If someone constipate the claribel then the claribel constipate the alaine. If someone ballyhoo the elysia and the elysia constipate the alaine then the alaine constipate the claribel. If someone conduce the elysia then the elysia is equestrian. If someone is equestrian then they eat the elysia. If someone ballyhoo the alaine and they like the claribel then they are equestrian. The alaine is modern.", "logic": "\nConstipate(claribel, elysia)\nConduce(alaine, claribel)\nBallyhoo(munroe, claribel)\nEbracteate(elysia)\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, claribel) -> Conduce(x, elysia))\nforall x (Constipate(x, munroe) -> Favorable(munroe))\nforall x (Favorable(x) and Conduce(x, alaine) -> Modern(alaine))\nforall x (Constipate(x, claribel) -> Constipate(claribel, alaine))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, elysia) and Constipate(elysia, alaine) -> Constipate(alaine, claribel))\nforall x (Conduce(x, elysia) -> Equestrian(elysia))\nforall x (Equestrian(x) -> Constipate(x, elysia))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, alaine) and Ballyhoo(x, claribel) -> Equestrian(x))\n\nModern(alaine)\n\nforall x (Favorable(x) and Conduce(x, alaine) -> Modern(alaine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The anabella inflame the wat. The mathilde treat the anabella. The zeb wangle the anabella. The wat is reversive. If someone wangle the anabella then they see the wat. If someone inflame the zeb then the zeb is wonted. If someone is wonted and they see the mathilde then the mathilde is rumanian. If someone inflame the anabella then the anabella inflame the mathilde. If someone wangle the wat and the wat inflame the mathilde then the mathilde inflame the anabella. If someone treat the wat then the wat is unsmooth. If someone is unsmooth then they eat the wat. If someone wangle the mathilde and they like the anabella then they are unsmooth. The mathilde is not unsmooth.", "logic": "\nInflame(anabella, wat)\nTreat(mathilde, anabella)\nWangle(zeb, anabella)\nReversive(wat)\nforall x (Wangle(x, anabella) -> Treat(x, wat))\nforall x (Inflame(x, zeb) -> Wonted(zeb))\nforall x (Wonted(x) and Treat(x, mathilde) -> Rumanian(mathilde))\nforall x (Inflame(x, anabella) -> Inflame(anabella, mathilde))\nforall x (Wangle(x, wat) and Inflame(wat, mathilde) -> Inflame(mathilde, anabella))\nforall x (Treat(x, wat) -> Unsmooth(wat))\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Inflame(x, wat))\nforall x (Wangle(x, mathilde) and Wangle(x, anabella) -> Unsmooth(x))\n\nnot Unsmooth(mathilde)\n\nforall x (Wangle(x, mathilde) and Wangle(x, anabella) -> Unsmooth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The malory tongue the zulema. The virginia impinge the malory. The shay podcast the malory. The zulema is degrading. If someone podcast the malory then they see the zulema. If someone tongue the shay then the shay is attractive. If someone is attractive and they see the virginia then the virginia is unerect. If someone tongue the malory then the malory tongue the virginia. If someone podcast the zulema and the zulema tongue the virginia then the virginia tongue the malory. If someone impinge the zulema then the zulema is depilatory. If someone is depilatory then they eat the zulema. If someone podcast the virginia and they like the malory then they are depilatory. The virginia tongue the zulema.", "logic": "\nTongue(malory, zulema)\nImpinge(virginia, malory)\nPodcast(shay, malory)\nDegrading(zulema)\nforall x (Podcast(x, malory) -> Impinge(x, zulema))\nforall x (Tongue(x, shay) -> Attractive(shay))\nforall x (Attractive(x) and Impinge(x, virginia) -> Unerect(virginia))\nforall x (Tongue(x, malory) -> Tongue(malory, virginia))\nforall x (Podcast(x, zulema) and Tongue(zulema, virginia) -> Tongue(virginia, malory))\nforall x (Impinge(x, zulema) -> Depilatory(zulema))\nforall x (Depilatory(x) -> Tongue(x, zulema))\nforall x (Podcast(x, virginia) and Podcast(x, malory) -> Depilatory(x))\n\nTongue(virginia, zulema)\n\nforall x (Depilatory(x) -> Tongue(x, zulema)) <- forall x (Podcast(x, virginia) and Podcast(x, malory) -> Depilatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The darell champion the glynn. The hillard dethrone the darell. The warden drop the darell. The glynn is autarkic. If someone drop the darell then they see the glynn. If someone champion the warden then the warden is worthwhile. If someone is worthwhile and they see the hillard then the hillard is drilled. If someone champion the darell then the darell champion the hillard. If someone drop the glynn and the glynn champion the hillard then the hillard champion the darell. If someone dethrone the glynn then the glynn is convex. If someone is convex then they eat the glynn. If someone drop the hillard and they like the darell then they are convex. The glynn does not eat the warden.", "logic": "\nChampion(darell, glynn)\nDethrone(hillard, darell)\nDrop(warden, darell)\nAutarkic(glynn)\nforall x (Drop(x, darell) -> Dethrone(x, glynn))\nforall x (Champion(x, warden) -> Worthwhile(warden))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) and Dethrone(x, hillard) -> Drilled(hillard))\nforall x (Champion(x, darell) -> Champion(darell, hillard))\nforall x (Drop(x, glynn) and Champion(glynn, hillard) -> Champion(hillard, darell))\nforall x (Dethrone(x, glynn) -> Convex(glynn))\nforall x (Convex(x) -> Champion(x, glynn))\nforall x (Drop(x, hillard) and Drop(x, darell) -> Convex(x))\n\nnot Champion(glynn, warden)\n\nnot Champion(glynn, warden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The mayda joggle the hakim. The jacquette baby the mayda. The natka stump the mayda. The hakim is uxorious. If someone stump the mayda then they see the hakim. If someone joggle the natka then the natka is inimitable. If someone is inimitable and they see the jacquette then the jacquette is turbulent. If someone joggle the mayda then the mayda joggle the jacquette. If someone stump the hakim and the hakim joggle the jacquette then the jacquette joggle the mayda. If someone baby the hakim then the hakim is achaean. If someone is achaean then they eat the hakim. If someone stump the jacquette and they like the mayda then they are achaean. The mayda joggle the mayda.", "logic": "\nJoggle(mayda, hakim)\nBaby(jacquette, mayda)\nStump(natka, mayda)\nUxorious(hakim)\nforall x (Stump(x, mayda) -> Baby(x, hakim))\nforall x (Joggle(x, natka) -> Inimitable(natka))\nforall x (Inimitable(x) and Baby(x, jacquette) -> Turbulent(jacquette))\nforall x (Joggle(x, mayda) -> Joggle(mayda, jacquette))\nforall x (Stump(x, hakim) and Joggle(hakim, jacquette) -> Joggle(jacquette, mayda))\nforall x (Baby(x, hakim) -> Achaean(hakim))\nforall x (Achaean(x) -> Joggle(x, hakim))\nforall x (Stump(x, jacquette) and Stump(x, mayda) -> Achaean(x))\n\nJoggle(mayda, mayda)\n\nJoggle(mayda, mayda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The ernie stripe the juan. The gloriana clangor the ernie. The rebbecca wonder the ernie. The juan is horrid. If someone wonder the ernie then they see the juan. If someone stripe the rebbecca then the rebbecca is timorous. If someone is timorous and they see the gloriana then the gloriana is violative. If someone stripe the ernie then the ernie stripe the gloriana. If someone wonder the juan and the juan stripe the gloriana then the gloriana stripe the ernie. If someone clangor the juan then the juan is strapless. If someone is strapless then they eat the juan. If someone wonder the gloriana and they like the ernie then they are strapless. The rebbecca does not see the ernie.", "logic": "\nStripe(ernie, juan)\nClangor(gloriana, ernie)\nWonder(rebbecca, ernie)\nHorrid(juan)\nforall x (Wonder(x, ernie) -> Clangor(x, juan))\nforall x (Stripe(x, rebbecca) -> Timorous(rebbecca))\nforall x (Timorous(x) and Clangor(x, gloriana) -> Violative(gloriana))\nforall x (Stripe(x, ernie) -> Stripe(ernie, gloriana))\nforall x (Wonder(x, juan) and Stripe(juan, gloriana) -> Stripe(gloriana, ernie))\nforall x (Clangor(x, juan) -> Strapless(juan))\nforall x (Strapless(x) -> Stripe(x, juan))\nforall x (Wonder(x, gloriana) and Wonder(x, ernie) -> Strapless(x))\n\nnot Clangor(rebbecca, ernie)\n\nnot Clangor(rebbecca, ernie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The janette prehend the blithe. The lurline introvert the janette. The nata galumph the janette. The blithe is slovenian. If someone galumph the janette then they see the blithe. If someone prehend the nata then the nata is magnetized. If someone is magnetized and they see the lurline then the lurline is rocky. If someone prehend the janette then the janette prehend the lurline. If someone galumph the blithe and the blithe prehend the lurline then the lurline prehend the janette. If someone introvert the blithe then the blithe is thickened. If someone is thickened then they eat the blithe. If someone galumph the lurline and they like the janette then they are thickened. The nata galumph the lurline.", "logic": "\nPrehend(janette, blithe)\nIntrovert(lurline, janette)\nGalumph(nata, janette)\nSlovenian(blithe)\nforall x (Galumph(x, janette) -> Introvert(x, blithe))\nforall x (Prehend(x, nata) -> Magnetized(nata))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) and Introvert(x, lurline) -> Rocky(lurline))\nforall x (Prehend(x, janette) -> Prehend(janette, lurline))\nforall x (Galumph(x, blithe) and Prehend(blithe, lurline) -> Prehend(lurline, janette))\nforall x (Introvert(x, blithe) -> Thickened(blithe))\nforall x (Thickened(x) -> Prehend(x, blithe))\nforall x (Galumph(x, lurline) and Galumph(x, janette) -> Thickened(x))\n\nGalumph(nata, lurline)\n\nGalumph(nata, lurline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Rollo is bootless. Rollo is ungainly. Rollo is ceylonese. Rollo is crested. Lucio is bootless. Lucio is ungainly. Lucio is bhutanese. Lucio is ceylonese. Lucio is uncanny. Lucio is crested. Young, bhutanese people are ceylonese. All horrified, ungainly people are crested. If Rollo is bootless and Rollo is uncanny then Rollo is crested. If someone is uncanny then they are bhutanese. All crested people are uncanny. All ceylonese, ungainly people are uncanny. If someone is bootless and bhutanese then they are horrified. All ungainly people are uncanny. Lucio is bhutanese.", "logic": "\nBootless(rollo)\nUngainly(rollo)\nCeylonese(rollo)\nCrested(rollo)\nBootless(lucio)\nUngainly(lucio)\nBhutanese(lucio)\nCeylonese(lucio)\nUncanny(lucio)\nCrested(lucio)\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Bhutanese(x) -> Ceylonese(x))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Ungainly(x) -> Crested(x))\nBootless(rollo) and Uncanny(rollo) -> Crested(rollo)\nforall x (Uncanny(x) -> Bhutanese(x))\nforall x (Crested(x) -> Uncanny(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) and Ungainly(x) -> Uncanny(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Bhutanese(x) -> Horrified(x))\nforall x (Ungainly(x) -> Uncanny(x))\n\nBhutanese(lucio)\n\ntherefore Bhutanese(lucio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Sherline is isomeric. Sherline is untaxed. Sherline is laureled. Sherline is prostatic. Brunhilde is isomeric. Brunhilde is untaxed. Brunhilde is biloculate. Brunhilde is laureled. Brunhilde is tritanopic. Brunhilde is prostatic. Young, biloculate people are laureled. All nucleated, untaxed people are prostatic. If Sherline is isomeric and Sherline is tritanopic then Sherline is prostatic. If someone is tritanopic then they are biloculate. All prostatic people are tritanopic. All laureled, untaxed people are tritanopic. If someone is isomeric and biloculate then they are nucleated. All untaxed people are tritanopic. Brunhilde is not biloculate.", "logic": "\nIsomeric(sherline)\nUntaxed(sherline)\nLaureled(sherline)\nProstatic(sherline)\nIsomeric(brunhilde)\nUntaxed(brunhilde)\nBiloculate(brunhilde)\nLaureled(brunhilde)\nTritanopic(brunhilde)\nProstatic(brunhilde)\nforall x (Nucleated(x) and Biloculate(x) -> Laureled(x))\nforall x (Nucleated(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Prostatic(x))\nIsomeric(sherline) and Tritanopic(sherline) -> Prostatic(sherline)\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Biloculate(x))\nforall x (Prostatic(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Laureled(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) and Biloculate(x) -> Nucleated(x))\nforall x (Untaxed(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\n\nnot Biloculate(brunhilde)\n\ntherefore Biloculate(brunhilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Starla is grisly. Starla is surly. Starla is sintered. Starla is lithic. Leta is grisly. Leta is surly. Leta is implacable. Leta is sintered. Leta is exogamic. Leta is lithic. Young, implacable people are sintered. All awash, surly people are lithic. If Starla is grisly and Starla is exogamic then Starla is lithic. If someone is exogamic then they are implacable. All lithic people are exogamic. All sintered, surly people are exogamic. If someone is grisly and implacable then they are awash. All surly people are exogamic. Leta is awash.", "logic": "\nGrisly(starla)\nSurly(starla)\nSintered(starla)\nLithic(starla)\nGrisly(leta)\nSurly(leta)\nImplacable(leta)\nSintered(leta)\nExogamic(leta)\nLithic(leta)\nforall x (Awash(x) and Implacable(x) -> Sintered(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Surly(x) -> Lithic(x))\nGrisly(starla) and Exogamic(starla) -> Lithic(starla)\nforall x (Exogamic(x) -> Implacable(x))\nforall x (Lithic(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Sintered(x) and Surly(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Grisly(x) and Implacable(x) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) -> Exogamic(x))\n\nAwash(leta)\n\nGrisly(leta) and Implacable(leta) and forall x (Grisly(x) and Implacable(x) -> Awash(x)) -> therefore Awash(leta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Dulci is permeating. Dulci is fewer. Dulci is thermionic. Dulci is hominal. Frayda is permeating. Frayda is fewer. Frayda is riotous. Frayda is thermionic. Frayda is symbolical. Frayda is hominal. Young, riotous people are thermionic. All motherly, fewer people are hominal. If Dulci is permeating and Dulci is symbolical then Dulci is hominal. If someone is symbolical then they are riotous. All hominal people are symbolical. All thermionic, fewer people are symbolical. If someone is permeating and riotous then they are motherly. All fewer people are symbolical. Dulci is not symbolical.", "logic": "\nPermeating(dulci)\nFewer(dulci)\nThermionic(dulci)\nHominal(dulci)\nPermeating(frayda)\nFewer(frayda)\nRiotous(frayda)\nThermionic(frayda)\nSymbolical(frayda)\nHominal(frayda)\nforall x (Motherly(x) and Riotous(x) -> Thermionic(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) and Fewer(x) -> Hominal(x))\nPermeating(dulci) and Symbolical(dulci) -> Hominal(dulci)\nforall x (Symbolical(x) -> Riotous(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) -> Symbolical(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) and Fewer(x) -> Symbolical(x))\nforall x (Permeating(x) and Riotous(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Fewer(x) -> Symbolical(x))\n\nnot Symbolical(dulci)\n\nFewer(dulci) and forall x (Fewer(x) -> Symbolical(x)) -> therefore Symbolical(dulci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Gayle is inactive. Gayle is minatory. Gayle is vitrified. Gayle is swaybacked. Kingston is inactive. Kingston is minatory. Kingston is kingly. Kingston is vitrified. Kingston is plutonian. Kingston is swaybacked. Young, kingly people are vitrified. All lifelike, minatory people are swaybacked. If Gayle is inactive and Gayle is plutonian then Gayle is swaybacked. If someone is plutonian then they are kingly. All swaybacked people are plutonian. All vitrified, minatory people are plutonian. If someone is inactive and kingly then they are lifelike. All minatory people are plutonian. Gayle is kingly.", "logic": "\nInactive(gayle)\nMinatory(gayle)\nVitrified(gayle)\nSwaybacked(gayle)\nInactive(kingston)\nMinatory(kingston)\nKingly(kingston)\nVitrified(kingston)\nPlutonian(kingston)\nSwaybacked(kingston)\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Kingly(x) -> Vitrified(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Minatory(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\nInactive(gayle) and Plutonian(gayle) -> Swaybacked(gayle)\nforall x (Plutonian(x) -> Kingly(x))\nforall x (Swaybacked(x) -> Plutonian(x))\nforall x (Vitrified(x) and Minatory(x) -> Plutonian(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) and Kingly(x) -> Lifelike(x))\nforall x (Minatory(x) -> Plutonian(x))\n\nKingly(gayle)\n\nMinatory(gayle) and forall x (Minatory(x) -> Plutonian(x)) -> therefore Plutonian(gayle) Plutonian(gayle) and forall x (Plutonian(x) -> Kingly(x)) -> therefore Kingly(gayle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Hildy is maplelike. Hildy is geared. Hildy is stagnant. Hildy is labeled. Fifine is maplelike. Fifine is geared. Fifine is compressed. Fifine is stagnant. Fifine is aneroid. Fifine is labeled. Young, compressed people are stagnant. All aging, geared people are labeled. If Hildy is maplelike and Hildy is aneroid then Hildy is labeled. If someone is aneroid then they are compressed. All labeled people are aneroid. All stagnant, geared people are aneroid. If someone is maplelike and compressed then they are aging. All geared people are aneroid. Hildy is not compressed.", "logic": "\nMaplelike(hildy)\nGeared(hildy)\nStagnant(hildy)\nLabeled(hildy)\nMaplelike(fifine)\nGeared(fifine)\nCompressed(fifine)\nStagnant(fifine)\nAneroid(fifine)\nLabeled(fifine)\nforall x (Aging(x) and Compressed(x) -> Stagnant(x))\nforall x (Aging(x) and Geared(x) -> Labeled(x))\nMaplelike(hildy) and Aneroid(hildy) -> Labeled(hildy)\nforall x (Aneroid(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Aneroid(x))\nforall x (Stagnant(x) and Geared(x) -> Aneroid(x))\nforall x (Maplelike(x) and Compressed(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Aneroid(x))\n\nnot Compressed(hildy)\n\nGeared(hildy) and forall x (Geared(x) -> Aneroid(x)) -> therefore Aneroid(hildy) Aneroid(hildy) and forall x (Aneroid(x) -> Compressed(x)) -> therefore Compressed(hildy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Jerrome is giving. Jerrome is polygamous. Jerrome is miasmic. Jerrome is circuitous. Lynnet is giving. Lynnet is polygamous. Lynnet is hornlike. Lynnet is miasmic. Lynnet is shrill. Lynnet is circuitous. Young, hornlike people are miasmic. All medial, polygamous people are circuitous. If Jerrome is giving and Jerrome is shrill then Jerrome is circuitous. If someone is shrill then they are hornlike. All circuitous people are shrill. All miasmic, polygamous people are shrill. If someone is giving and hornlike then they are medial. All polygamous people are shrill. Jerrome is medial.", "logic": "\nGiving(jerrome)\nPolygamous(jerrome)\nMiasmic(jerrome)\nCircuitous(jerrome)\nGiving(lynnet)\nPolygamous(lynnet)\nHornlike(lynnet)\nMiasmic(lynnet)\nShrill(lynnet)\nCircuitous(lynnet)\nforall x (Medial(x) and Hornlike(x) -> Miasmic(x))\nforall x (Medial(x) and Polygamous(x) -> Circuitous(x))\nGiving(jerrome) and Shrill(jerrome) -> Circuitous(jerrome)\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Hornlike(x))\nforall x (Circuitous(x) -> Shrill(x))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) and Polygamous(x) -> Shrill(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and Hornlike(x) -> Medial(x))\nforall x (Polygamous(x) -> Shrill(x))\n\nMedial(jerrome)\n\nPolygamous(jerrome) and forall x (Polygamous(x) -> Shrill(x)) -> therefore Shrill(jerrome) Shrill(jerrome) and forall x (Shrill(x) -> Hornlike(x)) -> therefore Hornlike(jerrome) Giving(jerrome) and Hornlike(jerrome) and forall x (Giving(x) and Hornlike(x) -> Medial(x)) -> therefore Medial(jerrome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Wrennie is paranormal. Wrennie is enhanced. Wrennie is bifilar. Wrennie is diametric. Carole is paranormal. Carole is enhanced. Carole is yawning. Carole is bifilar. Carole is indie. Carole is diametric. Young, yawning people are bifilar. All posthumous, enhanced people are diametric. If Wrennie is paranormal and Wrennie is indie then Wrennie is diametric. If someone is indie then they are yawning. All diametric people are indie. All bifilar, enhanced people are indie. If someone is paranormal and yawning then they are posthumous. All enhanced people are indie. Wrennie is not posthumous.", "logic": "\nParanormal(wrennie)\nEnhanced(wrennie)\nBifilar(wrennie)\nDiametric(wrennie)\nParanormal(carole)\nEnhanced(carole)\nYawning(carole)\nBifilar(carole)\nIndie(carole)\nDiametric(carole)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) and Yawning(x) -> Bifilar(x))\nforall x (Posthumous(x) and Enhanced(x) -> Diametric(x))\nParanormal(wrennie) and Indie(wrennie) -> Diametric(wrennie)\nforall x (Indie(x) -> Yawning(x))\nforall x (Diametric(x) -> Indie(x))\nforall x (Bifilar(x) and Enhanced(x) -> Indie(x))\nforall x (Paranormal(x) and Yawning(x) -> Posthumous(x))\nforall x (Enhanced(x) -> Indie(x))\n\nnot Posthumous(wrennie)\n\nEnhanced(wrennie) and forall x (Enhanced(x) -> Indie(x)) -> therefore Indie(wrennie) Indie(wrennie) and forall x (Indie(x) -> Yawning(x)) -> therefore Yawning(wrennie) Paranormal(wrennie) and Yawning(wrennie) and forall x (Paranormal(x) and Yawning(x) -> Posthumous(x)) -> therefore Posthumous(wrennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Phillis is palmy. Filbert is nursed. Sybil is not twelve. Neron is not neuronal. All emblematic things are sisterly. If something is nursed then it is proclaimed. Furry, nursed things are neuronal. If something is proclaimed and not twelve then it is neuronal. All proclaimed things are emblematic. If Neron is not twelve then Neron is not palmy. Filbert is nursed.", "logic": "\nPalmy(phillis)\nNursed(filbert)\nnot Twelve(sybil)\nnot Neuronal(neron)\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Sisterly(x))\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Proclaimed(x))\nforall x (Sisterly(x) and Nursed(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) and not Twelve(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nnot Twelve(neron) -> not Palmy(neron)\n\nNursed(filbert)\n\ntherefore Nursed(filbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Tanya is palpebrate. Darrel is aboulic. Chrisy is not polyglot. Genevieve is not custom. All robotlike things are malcontent. If something is aboulic then it is accidental. Furry, aboulic things are custom. If something is accidental and not polyglot then it is custom. All accidental things are robotlike. If Genevieve is not polyglot then Genevieve is not palpebrate. Darrel is not aboulic.", "logic": "\nPalpebrate(tanya)\nAboulic(darrel)\nnot Polyglot(chrisy)\nnot Custom(genevieve)\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Malcontent(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Accidental(x))\nforall x (Malcontent(x) and Aboulic(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Accidental(x) and not Polyglot(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Robotlike(x))\nnot Polyglot(genevieve) -> not Palpebrate(genevieve)\n\nnot Aboulic(darrel)\n\ntherefore Aboulic(darrel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Channa is rightmost. Lyndsie is sedulous. Zuzana is not cagey. Mireille is not fried. All medullated things are diarrheic. If something is sedulous then it is hearsay. Furry, sedulous things are fried. If something is hearsay and not cagey then it is fried. All hearsay things are medullated. If Mireille is not cagey then Mireille is not rightmost. Lyndsie is hearsay.", "logic": "\nRightmost(channa)\nSedulous(lyndsie)\nnot Cagey(zuzana)\nnot Fried(mireille)\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Diarrheic(x))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Sedulous(x) -> Fried(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) and not Cagey(x) -> Fried(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) -> Medullated(x))\nnot Cagey(mireille) -> not Rightmost(mireille)\n\nHearsay(lyndsie)\n\nSedulous(lyndsie) and forall x (Sedulous(x) -> Hearsay(x)) -> therefore Hearsay(lyndsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Daveen is caecal. Jory is odourless. Royce is not unconsumed. Coletta is not unfinished. All presbyopic things are delinquent. If something is odourless then it is tumescent. Furry, odourless things are unfinished. If something is tumescent and not unconsumed then it is unfinished. All tumescent things are presbyopic. If Coletta is not unconsumed then Coletta is not caecal. Jory is not tumescent.", "logic": "\nCaecal(daveen)\nOdourless(jory)\nnot Unconsumed(royce)\nnot Unfinished(coletta)\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Tumescent(x))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) and Odourless(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) and not Unconsumed(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) -> Presbyopic(x))\nnot Unconsumed(coletta) -> not Caecal(coletta)\n\nnot Tumescent(jory)\n\nOdourless(jory) and forall x (Odourless(x) -> Tumescent(x)) -> therefore Tumescent(jory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Viva is blotto. Allah is unshapely. Phillip is not hortative. Katine is not infrasonic. All cursory things are upcoming. If something is unshapely then it is nescient. Furry, unshapely things are infrasonic. If something is nescient and not hortative then it is infrasonic. All nescient things are cursory. If Katine is not hortative then Katine is not blotto. Allah is cursory.", "logic": "\nBlotto(viva)\nUnshapely(allah)\nnot Hortative(phillip)\nnot Infrasonic(katine)\nforall x (Cursory(x) -> Upcoming(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) -> Nescient(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Unshapely(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) and not Hortative(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) -> Cursory(x))\nnot Hortative(katine) -> not Blotto(katine)\n\nCursory(allah)\n\nUnshapely(allah) and forall x (Unshapely(x) -> Nescient(x)) -> therefore Nescient(allah) Nescient(allah) and forall x (Nescient(x) -> Cursory(x)) -> therefore Cursory(allah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Twila is irritating. Alida is arresting. Marylinda is not feigned. Dominica is not phantom. All potbellied things are unseeyn. If something is arresting then it is tottery. Furry, arresting things are phantom. If something is tottery and not feigned then it is phantom. All tottery things are potbellied. If Dominica is not feigned then Dominica is not irritating. Alida is not potbellied.", "logic": "\nIrritating(twila)\nArresting(alida)\nnot Feigned(marylinda)\nnot Phantom(dominica)\nforall x (Potbellied(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Arresting(x) -> Tottery(x))\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) and Arresting(x) -> Phantom(x))\nforall x (Tottery(x) and not Feigned(x) -> Phantom(x))\nforall x (Tottery(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nnot Feigned(dominica) -> not Irritating(dominica)\n\nnot Potbellied(alida)\n\nArresting(alida) and forall x (Arresting(x) -> Tottery(x)) -> therefore Tottery(alida) Tottery(alida) and forall x (Tottery(x) -> Potbellied(x)) -> therefore Potbellied(alida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "John is brindled. Zea is leery. Claus is not available. Chandal is not prolate. All duncical things are unwed. If something is leery then it is gruelling. Furry, leery things are prolate. If something is gruelling and not available then it is prolate. All gruelling things are duncical. If Chandal is not available then Chandal is not brindled. Zea is unwed.", "logic": "\nBrindled(john)\nLeery(zea)\nnot Available(claus)\nnot Prolate(chandal)\nforall x (Duncical(x) -> Unwed(x))\nforall x (Leery(x) -> Gruelling(x))\nforall x (Unwed(x) and Leery(x) -> Prolate(x))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and not Available(x) -> Prolate(x))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) -> Duncical(x))\nnot Available(chandal) -> not Brindled(chandal)\n\nUnwed(zea)\n\nLeery(zea) and forall x (Leery(x) -> Gruelling(x)) -> therefore Gruelling(zea) Gruelling(zea) and forall x (Gruelling(x) -> Duncical(x)) -> therefore Duncical(zea) Duncical(zea) and forall x (Duncical(x) -> Unwed(x)) -> therefore Unwed(zea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Alyda is mysophobic. Allegra is divided. Cleland is not binominal. Dillon is not nettled. All noncaloric things are ungulate. If something is divided then it is edited. Furry, divided things are nettled. If something is edited and not binominal then it is nettled. All edited things are noncaloric. If Dillon is not binominal then Dillon is not mysophobic. Allegra is not ungulate.", "logic": "\nMysophobic(alyda)\nDivided(allegra)\nnot Binominal(cleland)\nnot Nettled(dillon)\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Ungulate(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Edited(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and Divided(x) -> Nettled(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) and not Binominal(x) -> Nettled(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nnot Binominal(dillon) -> not Mysophobic(dillon)\n\nnot Ungulate(allegra)\n\nDivided(allegra) and forall x (Divided(x) -> Edited(x)) -> therefore Edited(allegra) Edited(allegra) and forall x (Edited(x) -> Noncaloric(x)) -> therefore Noncaloric(allegra) Noncaloric(allegra) and forall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Ungulate(x)) -> therefore Ungulate(allegra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Jim is dwindling. Angelle is yeasty. Tina is not delphic. Tomas is not principal. All propitious things are drained. If something is yeasty then it is zygotic. Furry, yeasty things are principal. If something is zygotic and not delphic then it is principal. All zygotic things are propitious. If Tomas is not delphic then Tomas is not dwindling. Tomas is not zygotic.", "logic": "\nDwindling(jim)\nYeasty(angelle)\nnot Delphic(tina)\nnot Principal(tomas)\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Drained(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Zygotic(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) and Yeasty(x) -> Principal(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and not Delphic(x) -> Principal(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) -> Propitious(x))\nnot Delphic(tomas) -> not Dwindling(tomas)\n\nnot Zygotic(tomas)\n\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Zygotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Orelia is handsome. Rodge is handelian. Chrystal is not homing. Pauli is not sublunar. All methodical things are gimpy. If something is handelian then it is metastatic. Furry, handelian things are sublunar. If something is metastatic and not homing then it is sublunar. All metastatic things are methodical. If Pauli is not homing then Pauli is not handsome. Chrystal is gimpy.", "logic": "\nHandsome(orelia)\nHandelian(rodge)\nnot Homing(chrystal)\nnot Sublunar(pauli)\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Gimpy(x))\nforall x (Handelian(x) -> Metastatic(x))\nforall x (Gimpy(x) and Handelian(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Metastatic(x) and not Homing(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Metastatic(x) -> Methodical(x))\nnot Homing(pauli) -> not Handsome(pauli)\n\nGimpy(chrystal)\n\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Gimpy(x)) <- forall x (Metastatic(x) -> Methodical(x)) <- forall x (Handelian(x) -> Metastatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Celene is chanceful. Matteo is categoric. Mercie is not afoul. Carter is not ducal. All through things are overbusy. If something is categoric then it is drilled. Furry, categoric things are ducal. If something is drilled and not afoul then it is ducal. All drilled things are through. If Carter is not afoul then Carter is not chanceful. Carter is not overbusy.", "logic": "\nChanceful(celene)\nCategoric(matteo)\nnot Afoul(mercie)\nnot Ducal(carter)\nforall x (Through(x) -> Overbusy(x))\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Drilled(x))\nforall x (Overbusy(x) and Categoric(x) -> Ducal(x))\nforall x (Drilled(x) and not Afoul(x) -> Ducal(x))\nforall x (Drilled(x) -> Through(x))\nnot Afoul(carter) -> not Chanceful(carter)\n\nnot Overbusy(carter)\n\nforall x (Through(x) -> Overbusy(x)) <- forall x (Drilled(x) -> Through(x)) <- forall x (Categoric(x) -> Drilled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Jose is multiphase. Anja is loyal. Venus is not delphian. Stevena is not quantal. All composite things are assumed. If something is loyal then it is specious. Furry, loyal things are quantal. If something is specious and not delphian then it is quantal. All specious things are composite. If Stevena is not delphian then Stevena is not multiphase. Jose is quantal.", "logic": "\nMultiphase(jose)\nLoyal(anja)\nnot Delphian(venus)\nnot Quantal(stevena)\nforall x (Composite(x) -> Assumed(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Specious(x))\nforall x (Assumed(x) and Loyal(x) -> Quantal(x))\nforall x (Specious(x) and not Delphian(x) -> Quantal(x))\nforall x (Specious(x) -> Composite(x))\nnot Delphian(stevena) -> not Multiphase(stevena)\n\nQuantal(jose)\n\nforall x (Assumed(x) and Loyal(x) -> Quantal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Becky is asternal. Lark is accordant. Erhart is not ukrainian. Glennie is not moderne. All largish things are endergonic. If something is accordant then it is sicilian. Furry, accordant things are moderne. If something is sicilian and not ukrainian then it is moderne. All sicilian things are largish. If Glennie is not ukrainian then Glennie is not asternal. Lark is not asternal.", "logic": "\nAsternal(becky)\nAccordant(lark)\nnot Ukrainian(erhart)\nnot Moderne(glennie)\nforall x (Largish(x) -> Endergonic(x))\nforall x (Accordant(x) -> Sicilian(x))\nforall x (Endergonic(x) and Accordant(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Sicilian(x) and not Ukrainian(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Sicilian(x) -> Largish(x))\nnot Ukrainian(glennie) -> not Asternal(glennie)\n\nnot Asternal(lark)\n\nnot Asternal(lark) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Meghann is footless. Arvy is wriggling. Denice is not antidromic. Elva is not piggish. All jarring things are dexter. If something is wriggling then it is gross. Furry, wriggling things are piggish. If something is gross and not antidromic then it is piggish. All gross things are jarring. If Elva is not antidromic then Elva is not footless. Denice is footless.", "logic": "\nFootless(meghann)\nWriggling(arvy)\nnot Antidromic(denice)\nnot Piggish(elva)\nforall x (Jarring(x) -> Dexter(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Gross(x))\nforall x (Dexter(x) and Wriggling(x) -> Piggish(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) and not Antidromic(x) -> Piggish(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) -> Jarring(x))\nnot Antidromic(elva) -> not Footless(elva)\n\nFootless(denice)\n\nFootless(denice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Aveline is contorted. Allis is mannered. Kerrie is not beaten. Bryant is not buirdly. All anchoritic things are revengeful. If something is mannered then it is isolable. Furry, mannered things are buirdly. If something is isolable and not beaten then it is buirdly. All isolable things are anchoritic. If Bryant is not beaten then Bryant is not contorted. Bryant is not contorted.", "logic": "\nContorted(aveline)\nMannered(allis)\nnot Beaten(kerrie)\nnot Buirdly(bryant)\nforall x (Anchoritic(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) -> Isolable(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) and Mannered(x) -> Buirdly(x))\nforall x (Isolable(x) and not Beaten(x) -> Buirdly(x))\nforall x (Isolable(x) -> Anchoritic(x))\nnot Beaten(bryant) -> not Contorted(bryant)\n\nnot Contorted(bryant)\n\nnot Contorted(bryant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Eleanor is tipsy. Hilarie is chinchy. Milicent is not mouthlike. Leila is not doddery. All untrained things are bisexual. If something is chinchy then it is younger. Furry, chinchy things are doddery. If something is younger and not mouthlike then it is doddery. All younger things are untrained. If Leila is not mouthlike then Leila is not tipsy. Hilarie is mouthlike.", "logic": "\nTipsy(eleanor)\nChinchy(hilarie)\nnot Mouthlike(milicent)\nnot Doddery(leila)\nforall x (Untrained(x) -> Bisexual(x))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Younger(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) and Chinchy(x) -> Doddery(x))\nforall x (Younger(x) and not Mouthlike(x) -> Doddery(x))\nforall x (Younger(x) -> Untrained(x))\nnot Mouthlike(leila) -> not Tipsy(leila)\n\nMouthlike(hilarie)\n\nMouthlike(hilarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Tasia is caucasian. Tasia is plummy. Tasia is unschooled. Tasia is anatomic. Tommi is smashing. Tommi is shed. Tommi is unschooled. Tommi is anatomic. Murphy is caucasian. Murphy is waspish. Sylvie is plummy. Sylvie is unschooled. Cold things are shed. Quiet things are smashing. If Sylvie is waspish and Sylvie is anatomic then Sylvie is shed. If something is unschooled then it is waspish. If Murphy is unschooled then Murphy is plummy. Nice things are caucasian. Tasia is caucasian.", "logic": "\nCaucasian(tasia)\nPlummy(tasia)\nUnschooled(tasia)\nAnatomic(tasia)\nSmashing(tommi)\nShed(tommi)\nUnschooled(tommi)\nAnatomic(tommi)\nCaucasian(murphy)\nWaspish(murphy)\nPlummy(sylvie)\nUnschooled(sylvie)\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) -> Smashing(x))\nWaspish(sylvie) and Anatomic(sylvie) -> Shed(sylvie)\nforall x (Unschooled(x) -> Waspish(x))\nUnschooled(murphy) -> Plummy(murphy)\nforall x (Smashing(x) -> Caucasian(x))\n\nCaucasian(tasia)\n\ntherefore Caucasian(tasia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Lilias is polysemous. Lilias is fewer. Lilias is unrimed. Lilias is fiscal. Florenza is cathectic. Florenza is oversexed. Florenza is unrimed. Florenza is fiscal. Merrill is polysemous. Merrill is improvised. Paulette is fewer. Paulette is unrimed. Cold things are oversexed. Quiet things are cathectic. If Paulette is improvised and Paulette is fiscal then Paulette is oversexed. If something is unrimed then it is improvised. If Merrill is unrimed then Merrill is fewer. Nice things are polysemous. Merrill is not improvised.", "logic": "\nPolysemous(lilias)\nFewer(lilias)\nUnrimed(lilias)\nFiscal(lilias)\nCathectic(florenza)\nOversexed(florenza)\nUnrimed(florenza)\nFiscal(florenza)\nPolysemous(merrill)\nImprovised(merrill)\nFewer(paulette)\nUnrimed(paulette)\nforall x (Fewer(x) -> Oversexed(x))\nforall x (Oversexed(x) -> Cathectic(x))\nImprovised(paulette) and Fiscal(paulette) -> Oversexed(paulette)\nforall x (Unrimed(x) -> Improvised(x))\nUnrimed(merrill) -> Fewer(merrill)\nforall x (Cathectic(x) -> Polysemous(x))\n\nnot Improvised(merrill)\n\ntherefore Improvised(merrill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Gabey is mormon. Gabey is exhaustive. Gabey is entozoic. Gabey is inhumed. Kendrick is callous. Kendrick is bullying. Kendrick is entozoic. Kendrick is inhumed. Joellen is mormon. Joellen is apocryphal. Sharron is exhaustive. Sharron is entozoic. Cold things are bullying. Quiet things are callous. If Sharron is apocryphal and Sharron is inhumed then Sharron is bullying. If something is entozoic then it is apocryphal. If Joellen is entozoic then Joellen is exhaustive. Nice things are mormon. Sharron is apocryphal.", "logic": "\nMormon(gabey)\nExhaustive(gabey)\nEntozoic(gabey)\nInhumed(gabey)\nCallous(kendrick)\nBullying(kendrick)\nEntozoic(kendrick)\nInhumed(kendrick)\nMormon(joellen)\nApocryphal(joellen)\nExhaustive(sharron)\nEntozoic(sharron)\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Bullying(x))\nforall x (Bullying(x) -> Callous(x))\nApocryphal(sharron) and Inhumed(sharron) -> Bullying(sharron)\nforall x (Entozoic(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\nEntozoic(joellen) -> Exhaustive(joellen)\nforall x (Callous(x) -> Mormon(x))\n\nApocryphal(sharron)\n\nEntozoic(sharron) and forall x (Entozoic(x) -> Apocryphal(x)) -> therefore Apocryphal(sharron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Judi is reflective. Judi is pulpy. Judi is aloof. Judi is intrepid. Giovanne is depicted. Giovanne is peaty. Giovanne is aloof. Giovanne is intrepid. Katharine is reflective. Katharine is filar. Holly is pulpy. Holly is aloof. Cold things are peaty. Quiet things are depicted. If Holly is filar and Holly is intrepid then Holly is peaty. If something is aloof then it is filar. If Katharine is aloof then Katharine is pulpy. Nice things are reflective. Judi is not filar.", "logic": "\nReflective(judi)\nPulpy(judi)\nAloof(judi)\nIntrepid(judi)\nDepicted(giovanne)\nPeaty(giovanne)\nAloof(giovanne)\nIntrepid(giovanne)\nReflective(katharine)\nFilar(katharine)\nPulpy(holly)\nAloof(holly)\nforall x (Pulpy(x) -> Peaty(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) -> Depicted(x))\nFilar(holly) and Intrepid(holly) -> Peaty(holly)\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Filar(x))\nAloof(katharine) -> Pulpy(katharine)\nforall x (Depicted(x) -> Reflective(x))\n\nnot Filar(judi)\n\nAloof(judi) and forall x (Aloof(x) -> Filar(x)) -> therefore Filar(judi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Cristin is chagrined. Cristin is hircine. Cristin is vain. Cristin is telescopic. Lowell is annulate. Lowell is greyish. Lowell is vain. Lowell is telescopic. Izzy is chagrined. Izzy is variolar. Joya is hircine. Joya is vain. Cold things are greyish. Quiet things are annulate. If Joya is variolar and Joya is telescopic then Joya is greyish. If something is vain then it is variolar. If Izzy is vain then Izzy is hircine. Nice things are chagrined. Cristin is annulate.", "logic": "\nChagrined(cristin)\nHircine(cristin)\nVain(cristin)\nTelescopic(cristin)\nAnnulate(lowell)\nGreyish(lowell)\nVain(lowell)\nTelescopic(lowell)\nChagrined(izzy)\nVariolar(izzy)\nHircine(joya)\nVain(joya)\nforall x (Hircine(x) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Greyish(x) -> Annulate(x))\nVariolar(joya) and Telescopic(joya) -> Greyish(joya)\nforall x (Vain(x) -> Variolar(x))\nVain(izzy) -> Hircine(izzy)\nforall x (Annulate(x) -> Chagrined(x))\n\nAnnulate(cristin)\n\nHircine(cristin) and forall x (Hircine(x) -> Greyish(x)) -> therefore Greyish(cristin) Greyish(cristin) and forall x (Greyish(x) -> Annulate(x)) -> therefore Annulate(cristin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Elvis is deceased. Elvis is auric. Elvis is conic. Elvis is biped. Erda is acquirable. Erda is coriaceous. Erda is conic. Erda is biped. Violette is deceased. Violette is acrid. Ephrem is auric. Ephrem is conic. Cold things are coriaceous. Quiet things are acquirable. If Ephrem is acrid and Ephrem is biped then Ephrem is coriaceous. If something is conic then it is acrid. If Violette is conic then Violette is auric. Nice things are deceased. Elvis is not acquirable.", "logic": "\nDeceased(elvis)\nAuric(elvis)\nConic(elvis)\nBiped(elvis)\nAcquirable(erda)\nCoriaceous(erda)\nConic(erda)\nBiped(erda)\nDeceased(violette)\nAcrid(violette)\nAuric(ephrem)\nConic(ephrem)\nforall x (Auric(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Acquirable(x))\nAcrid(ephrem) and Biped(ephrem) -> Coriaceous(ephrem)\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Acrid(x))\nConic(violette) -> Auric(violette)\nforall x (Acquirable(x) -> Deceased(x))\n\nnot Acquirable(elvis)\n\nAuric(elvis) and forall x (Auric(x) -> Coriaceous(x)) -> therefore Coriaceous(elvis) Coriaceous(elvis) and forall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Acquirable(x)) -> therefore Acquirable(elvis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Wittie is snuff. Wittie is gravelly. Wittie is tropic. Wittie is incoherent. Dania is premarital. Dania is offbeat. Dania is tropic. Dania is incoherent. Silvester is snuff. Silvester is lengthened. Rhona is gravelly. Rhona is tropic. Cold things are offbeat. Quiet things are premarital. If Rhona is lengthened and Rhona is incoherent then Rhona is offbeat. If something is tropic then it is lengthened. If Silvester is tropic then Silvester is gravelly. Nice things are snuff. Rhona is snuff.", "logic": "\nSnuff(wittie)\nGravelly(wittie)\nTropic(wittie)\nIncoherent(wittie)\nPremarital(dania)\nOffbeat(dania)\nTropic(dania)\nIncoherent(dania)\nSnuff(silvester)\nLengthened(silvester)\nGravelly(rhona)\nTropic(rhona)\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) -> Premarital(x))\nLengthened(rhona) and Incoherent(rhona) -> Offbeat(rhona)\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nTropic(silvester) -> Gravelly(silvester)\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> Snuff(x))\n\nSnuff(rhona)\n\nGravelly(rhona) and forall x (Gravelly(x) -> Offbeat(x)) -> therefore Offbeat(rhona) Offbeat(rhona) and forall x (Offbeat(x) -> Premarital(x)) -> therefore Premarital(rhona) Premarital(rhona) and forall x (Premarital(x) -> Snuff(x)) -> therefore Snuff(rhona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Jordon is pilotless. Jordon is exilic. Jordon is dipylon. Jordon is subdural. Renell is womanly. Renell is cloistral. Renell is dipylon. Renell is subdural. Malva is pilotless. Malva is futureless. Crista is exilic. Crista is dipylon. Cold things are cloistral. Quiet things are womanly. If Crista is futureless and Crista is subdural then Crista is cloistral. If something is dipylon then it is futureless. If Malva is dipylon then Malva is exilic. Nice things are pilotless. Crista is not pilotless.", "logic": "\nPilotless(jordon)\nExilic(jordon)\nDipylon(jordon)\nSubdural(jordon)\nWomanly(renell)\nCloistral(renell)\nDipylon(renell)\nSubdural(renell)\nPilotless(malva)\nFutureless(malva)\nExilic(crista)\nDipylon(crista)\nforall x (Exilic(x) -> Cloistral(x))\nforall x (Cloistral(x) -> Womanly(x))\nFutureless(crista) and Subdural(crista) -> Cloistral(crista)\nforall x (Dipylon(x) -> Futureless(x))\nDipylon(malva) -> Exilic(malva)\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Pilotless(x))\n\nnot Pilotless(crista)\n\nExilic(crista) and forall x (Exilic(x) -> Cloistral(x)) -> therefore Cloistral(crista) Cloistral(crista) and forall x (Cloistral(x) -> Womanly(x)) -> therefore Womanly(crista) Womanly(crista) and forall x (Womanly(x) -> Pilotless(x)) -> therefore Pilotless(crista)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Berrie is subdued. Berrie is jungly. Berrie is untested. Berrie is joyful. Dixie is verbose. Dixie is niggardly. Dixie is untested. Dixie is joyful. Lamar is subdued. Lamar is roundabout. Nina is jungly. Nina is untested. Cold things are niggardly. Quiet things are verbose. If Nina is roundabout and Nina is joyful then Nina is niggardly. If something is untested then it is roundabout. If Lamar is untested then Lamar is jungly. Nice things are subdued. Lamar is not verbose.", "logic": "\nSubdued(berrie)\nJungly(berrie)\nUntested(berrie)\nJoyful(berrie)\nVerbose(dixie)\nNiggardly(dixie)\nUntested(dixie)\nJoyful(dixie)\nSubdued(lamar)\nRoundabout(lamar)\nJungly(nina)\nUntested(nina)\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Niggardly(x))\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Verbose(x))\nRoundabout(nina) and Joyful(nina) -> Niggardly(nina)\nforall x (Untested(x) -> Roundabout(x))\nUntested(lamar) -> Jungly(lamar)\nforall x (Verbose(x) -> Subdued(x))\n\nnot Verbose(lamar)\n\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Verbose(x)) <- forall x (Jungly(x) -> Niggardly(x)) <- Untested(lamar) -> Jungly(lamar) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Flin is volatile. Flin is sibyllic. Flin is convenient. Flin is ceramic. Olivier is reportable. Olivier is skilled. Olivier is convenient. Olivier is ceramic. Vite is volatile. Vite is affirmable. Sussi is sibyllic. Sussi is convenient. Cold things are skilled. Quiet things are reportable. If Sussi is affirmable and Sussi is ceramic then Sussi is skilled. If something is convenient then it is affirmable. If Vite is convenient then Vite is sibyllic. Nice things are volatile. Vite is skilled.", "logic": "\nVolatile(flin)\nSibyllic(flin)\nConvenient(flin)\nCeramic(flin)\nReportable(olivier)\nSkilled(olivier)\nConvenient(olivier)\nCeramic(olivier)\nVolatile(vite)\nAffirmable(vite)\nSibyllic(sussi)\nConvenient(sussi)\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Reportable(x))\nAffirmable(sussi) and Ceramic(sussi) -> Skilled(sussi)\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nConvenient(vite) -> Sibyllic(vite)\nforall x (Reportable(x) -> Volatile(x))\n\nSkilled(vite)\n\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) -> Skilled(x)) <- Convenient(vite) -> Sibyllic(vite) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Cortney is assuring. Cortney is teeming. Cortney is untapped. Cortney is ibsenian. Juana is homonymic. Juana is arillate. Juana is untapped. Juana is ibsenian. Morry is assuring. Morry is unheeding. Tawnya is teeming. Tawnya is untapped. Cold things are arillate. Quiet things are homonymic. If Tawnya is unheeding and Tawnya is ibsenian then Tawnya is arillate. If something is untapped then it is unheeding. If Morry is untapped then Morry is teeming. Nice things are assuring. Morry is not teeming.", "logic": "\nAssuring(cortney)\nTeeming(cortney)\nUntapped(cortney)\nIbsenian(cortney)\nHomonymic(juana)\nArillate(juana)\nUntapped(juana)\nIbsenian(juana)\nAssuring(morry)\nUnheeding(morry)\nTeeming(tawnya)\nUntapped(tawnya)\nforall x (Teeming(x) -> Arillate(x))\nforall x (Arillate(x) -> Homonymic(x))\nUnheeding(tawnya) and Ibsenian(tawnya) -> Arillate(tawnya)\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nUntapped(morry) -> Teeming(morry)\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> Assuring(x))\n\nnot Teeming(morry)\n\nUntapped(morry) -> Teeming(morry) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Darrell is catkinate. Darrell is aplacental. Darrell is frostian. Darrell is poached. Cindi is drawn. Cindi is ideologic. Cindi is frostian. Cindi is poached. Garrot is catkinate. Garrot is fired. Juliann is aplacental. Juliann is frostian. Cold things are ideologic. Quiet things are drawn. If Juliann is fired and Juliann is poached then Juliann is ideologic. If something is frostian then it is fired. If Garrot is frostian then Garrot is aplacental. Nice things are catkinate. Garrot is poached.", "logic": "\nCatkinate(darrell)\nAplacental(darrell)\nFrostian(darrell)\nPoached(darrell)\nDrawn(cindi)\nIdeologic(cindi)\nFrostian(cindi)\nPoached(cindi)\nCatkinate(garrot)\nFired(garrot)\nAplacental(juliann)\nFrostian(juliann)\nforall x (Aplacental(x) -> Ideologic(x))\nforall x (Ideologic(x) -> Drawn(x))\nFired(juliann) and Poached(juliann) -> Ideologic(juliann)\nforall x (Frostian(x) -> Fired(x))\nFrostian(garrot) -> Aplacental(garrot)\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Catkinate(x))\n\nPoached(garrot)\n\nPoached(garrot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Appolonia is numeric. Appolonia is skirting. Appolonia is diluvial. Appolonia is vaulted. Yaakov is odorous. Yaakov is uniform. Yaakov is diluvial. Yaakov is vaulted. Nessa is numeric. Nessa is leftover. Tabby is skirting. Tabby is diluvial. Cold things are uniform. Quiet things are odorous. If Tabby is leftover and Tabby is vaulted then Tabby is uniform. If something is diluvial then it is leftover. If Nessa is diluvial then Nessa is skirting. Nice things are numeric. Nessa is not diluvial.", "logic": "\nNumeric(appolonia)\nSkirting(appolonia)\nDiluvial(appolonia)\nVaulted(appolonia)\nOdorous(yaakov)\nUniform(yaakov)\nDiluvial(yaakov)\nVaulted(yaakov)\nNumeric(nessa)\nLeftover(nessa)\nSkirting(tabby)\nDiluvial(tabby)\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Uniform(x))\nforall x (Uniform(x) -> Odorous(x))\nLeftover(tabby) and Vaulted(tabby) -> Uniform(tabby)\nforall x (Diluvial(x) -> Leftover(x))\nDiluvial(nessa) -> Skirting(nessa)\nforall x (Odorous(x) -> Numeric(x))\n\nnot Diluvial(nessa)\n\nnot Diluvial(nessa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Ileane is averse. Ileane is technical. Ileane is fattish. Ileane is lugubrious. Elisa is foliate. Elisa is pedigree. Elisa is fattish. Elisa is lugubrious. Kirstie is averse. Kirstie is buckshee. Jeremiah is technical. Jeremiah is fattish. Cold things are pedigree. Quiet things are foliate. If Jeremiah is buckshee and Jeremiah is lugubrious then Jeremiah is pedigree. If something is fattish then it is buckshee. If Kirstie is fattish then Kirstie is technical. Nice things are averse. Jeremiah is lugubrious.", "logic": "\nAverse(ileane)\nTechnical(ileane)\nFattish(ileane)\nLugubrious(ileane)\nFoliate(elisa)\nPedigree(elisa)\nFattish(elisa)\nLugubrious(elisa)\nAverse(kirstie)\nBuckshee(kirstie)\nTechnical(jeremiah)\nFattish(jeremiah)\nforall x (Technical(x) -> Pedigree(x))\nforall x (Pedigree(x) -> Foliate(x))\nBuckshee(jeremiah) and Lugubrious(jeremiah) -> Pedigree(jeremiah)\nforall x (Fattish(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nFattish(kirstie) -> Technical(kirstie)\nforall x (Foliate(x) -> Averse(x))\n\nLugubrious(jeremiah)\n\nLugubrious(jeremiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Dudley is not unkempt. Dudley is ungrateful. Dudley is uninformed. Dudley is appalled. Eada is ungrateful. Ellwood is not fringed. Jacintha is fringed. Young people are uninformed. All unkempt people are not ungrateful. All bogartian, ungrateful people are musical. If Dudley is bogartian then Dudley is uninformed. All fringed, musical people are bogartian. All appalled people are bogartian. If Ellwood is appalled and Ellwood is not ungrateful then Ellwood is musical. All musical people are not fringed. Dudley is ungrateful.", "logic": "\nnot Unkempt(dudley)\nUngrateful(dudley)\nUninformed(dudley)\nAppalled(dudley)\nUngrateful(eada)\nnot Fringed(ellwood)\nFringed(jacintha)\nforall x (Appalled(x) -> Uninformed(x))\nforall x (Unkempt(x) -> not Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (Bogartian(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> Musical(x))\nBogartian(dudley) -> Uninformed(dudley)\nforall x (Fringed(x) and Musical(x) -> Bogartian(x))\nforall x (Appalled(x) -> Bogartian(x))\nAppalled(ellwood) and not Ungrateful(ellwood) -> Musical(ellwood)\nforall x (Musical(x) -> not Fringed(x))\n\nUngrateful(dudley)\n\ntherefore Ungrateful(dudley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Crystie is not georgian. Crystie is pancreatic. Crystie is translunar. Crystie is aggravated. Kevin is pancreatic. Dexter is not elder. Sissie is elder. Young people are translunar. All georgian people are not pancreatic. All crustal, pancreatic people are cutthroat. If Crystie is crustal then Crystie is translunar. All elder, cutthroat people are crustal. All aggravated people are crustal. If Dexter is aggravated and Dexter is not pancreatic then Dexter is cutthroat. All cutthroat people are not elder. Crystie is not aggravated.", "logic": "\nnot Georgian(crystie)\nPancreatic(crystie)\nTranslunar(crystie)\nAggravated(crystie)\nPancreatic(kevin)\nnot Elder(dexter)\nElder(sissie)\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Translunar(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> not Pancreatic(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) and Pancreatic(x) -> Cutthroat(x))\nCrustal(crystie) -> Translunar(crystie)\nforall x (Elder(x) and Cutthroat(x) -> Crustal(x))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Crustal(x))\nAggravated(dexter) and not Pancreatic(dexter) -> Cutthroat(dexter)\nforall x (Cutthroat(x) -> not Elder(x))\n\nnot Aggravated(crystie)\n\ntherefore Aggravated(crystie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Aldis is not odorless. Aldis is sacral. Aldis is heliacal. Aldis is moroccan. Rodolphe is sacral. Jennings is not shallow. Hebert is shallow. Young people are heliacal. All odorless people are not sacral. All broadside, sacral people are nocturnal. If Aldis is broadside then Aldis is heliacal. All shallow, nocturnal people are broadside. All moroccan people are broadside. If Jennings is moroccan and Jennings is not sacral then Jennings is nocturnal. All nocturnal people are not shallow. Aldis is broadside.", "logic": "\nnot Odorless(aldis)\nSacral(aldis)\nHeliacal(aldis)\nMoroccan(aldis)\nSacral(rodolphe)\nnot Shallow(jennings)\nShallow(hebert)\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Heliacal(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> not Sacral(x))\nforall x (Broadside(x) and Sacral(x) -> Nocturnal(x))\nBroadside(aldis) -> Heliacal(aldis)\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> Broadside(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Broadside(x))\nMoroccan(jennings) and not Sacral(jennings) -> Nocturnal(jennings)\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) -> not Shallow(x))\n\nBroadside(aldis)\n\nMoroccan(aldis) and forall x (Moroccan(x) -> Broadside(x)) -> therefore Broadside(aldis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Tully is not teenage. Tully is sheltered. Tully is steely. Tully is liplike. Jenelle is sheltered. Yelena is not facetious. Ephrayim is facetious. Young people are steely. All teenage people are not sheltered. All syrupy, sheltered people are livery. If Tully is syrupy then Tully is steely. All facetious, livery people are syrupy. All liplike people are syrupy. If Yelena is liplike and Yelena is not sheltered then Yelena is livery. All livery people are not facetious. Tully is not syrupy.", "logic": "\nnot Teenage(tully)\nSheltered(tully)\nSteely(tully)\nLiplike(tully)\nSheltered(jenelle)\nnot Facetious(yelena)\nFacetious(ephrayim)\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Teenage(x) -> not Sheltered(x))\nforall x (Syrupy(x) and Sheltered(x) -> Livery(x))\nSyrupy(tully) -> Steely(tully)\nforall x (Facetious(x) and Livery(x) -> Syrupy(x))\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Syrupy(x))\nLiplike(yelena) and not Sheltered(yelena) -> Livery(yelena)\nforall x (Livery(x) -> not Facetious(x))\n\nnot Syrupy(tully)\n\nLiplike(tully) and forall x (Liplike(x) -> Syrupy(x)) -> therefore Syrupy(tully)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Aleck is not hospitable. Aleck is exotic. Aleck is downcast. Aleck is mincing. Gregory is exotic. Shimon is not nosy. Lanny is nosy. Young people are downcast. All hospitable people are not exotic. All incised, exotic people are doubtful. If Aleck is incised then Aleck is downcast. All nosy, doubtful people are incised. All mincing people are incised. If Shimon is mincing and Shimon is not exotic then Shimon is doubtful. All doubtful people are not nosy. Aleck is doubtful.", "logic": "\nnot Hospitable(aleck)\nExotic(aleck)\nDowncast(aleck)\nMincing(aleck)\nExotic(gregory)\nnot Nosy(shimon)\nNosy(lanny)\nforall x (Mincing(x) -> Downcast(x))\nforall x (Hospitable(x) -> not Exotic(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) and Exotic(x) -> Doubtful(x))\nIncised(aleck) -> Downcast(aleck)\nforall x (Nosy(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Incised(x))\nforall x (Mincing(x) -> Incised(x))\nMincing(shimon) and not Exotic(shimon) -> Doubtful(shimon)\nforall x (Doubtful(x) -> not Nosy(x))\n\nDoubtful(aleck)\n\nMincing(aleck) and forall x (Mincing(x) -> Incised(x)) -> therefore Incised(aleck) Incised(aleck) and Exotic(aleck) and forall x (Incised(x) and Exotic(x) -> Doubtful(x)) -> therefore Doubtful(aleck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Tonia is not accoutred. Tonia is gloomful. Tonia is steepish. Tonia is atactic. Englebert is gloomful. Sanderson is not garlicky. Frederic is garlicky. Young people are steepish. All accoutred people are not gloomful. All ruminant, gloomful people are charmed. If Tonia is ruminant then Tonia is steepish. All garlicky, charmed people are ruminant. All atactic people are ruminant. If Sanderson is atactic and Sanderson is not gloomful then Sanderson is charmed. All charmed people are not garlicky. Tonia is not charmed.", "logic": "\nnot Accoutred(tonia)\nGloomful(tonia)\nSteepish(tonia)\nAtactic(tonia)\nGloomful(englebert)\nnot Garlicky(sanderson)\nGarlicky(frederic)\nforall x (Atactic(x) -> Steepish(x))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) -> not Gloomful(x))\nforall x (Ruminant(x) and Gloomful(x) -> Charmed(x))\nRuminant(tonia) -> Steepish(tonia)\nforall x (Garlicky(x) and Charmed(x) -> Ruminant(x))\nforall x (Atactic(x) -> Ruminant(x))\nAtactic(sanderson) and not Gloomful(sanderson) -> Charmed(sanderson)\nforall x (Charmed(x) -> not Garlicky(x))\n\nnot Charmed(tonia)\n\nAtactic(tonia) and forall x (Atactic(x) -> Ruminant(x)) -> therefore Ruminant(tonia) Ruminant(tonia) and Gloomful(tonia) and forall x (Ruminant(x) and Gloomful(x) -> Charmed(x)) -> therefore Charmed(tonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Avrom is not unavenged. Avrom is expiatory. Avrom is toeless. Avrom is polyhedral. Patrik is expiatory. Wanda is not complacent. Viki is complacent. Young people are toeless. All unavenged people are not expiatory. All lucullan, expiatory people are inside. If Avrom is lucullan then Avrom is toeless. All complacent, inside people are lucullan. All polyhedral people are lucullan. If Wanda is polyhedral and Wanda is not expiatory then Wanda is inside. All inside people are not complacent. Avrom is not complacent.", "logic": "\nnot Unavenged(avrom)\nExpiatory(avrom)\nToeless(avrom)\nPolyhedral(avrom)\nExpiatory(patrik)\nnot Complacent(wanda)\nComplacent(viki)\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Toeless(x))\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> not Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Lucullan(x) and Expiatory(x) -> Inside(x))\nLucullan(avrom) -> Toeless(avrom)\nforall x (Complacent(x) and Inside(x) -> Lucullan(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Lucullan(x))\nPolyhedral(wanda) and not Expiatory(wanda) -> Inside(wanda)\nforall x (Inside(x) -> not Complacent(x))\n\nnot Complacent(avrom)\n\nPolyhedral(avrom) and forall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Lucullan(x)) -> therefore Lucullan(avrom) Lucullan(avrom) and Expiatory(avrom) and forall x (Lucullan(x) and Expiatory(x) -> Inside(x)) -> therefore Inside(avrom) Inside(avrom) and forall x (Inside(x) -> not Complacent(x)) -> therefore not Complacent(avrom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Norene is not slouchy. Norene is vile. Norene is salutary. Norene is unwearable. Hal is vile. Madona is not evanescent. Tab is evanescent. Young people are salutary. All slouchy people are not vile. All nonuniform, vile people are republican. If Norene is nonuniform then Norene is salutary. All evanescent, republican people are nonuniform. All unwearable people are nonuniform. If Madona is unwearable and Madona is not vile then Madona is republican. All republican people are not evanescent. Norene is evanescent.", "logic": "\nnot Slouchy(norene)\nVile(norene)\nSalutary(norene)\nUnwearable(norene)\nVile(hal)\nnot Evanescent(madona)\nEvanescent(tab)\nforall x (Unwearable(x) -> Salutary(x))\nforall x (Slouchy(x) -> not Vile(x))\nforall x (Nonuniform(x) and Vile(x) -> Republican(x))\nNonuniform(norene) -> Salutary(norene)\nforall x (Evanescent(x) and Republican(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Unwearable(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\nUnwearable(madona) and not Vile(madona) -> Republican(madona)\nforall x (Republican(x) -> not Evanescent(x))\n\nEvanescent(norene)\n\nUnwearable(norene) and forall x (Unwearable(x) -> Nonuniform(x)) -> therefore Nonuniform(norene) Nonuniform(norene) and Vile(norene) and forall x (Nonuniform(x) and Vile(x) -> Republican(x)) -> therefore Republican(norene) Republican(norene) and forall x (Republican(x) -> not Evanescent(x)) -> therefore not Evanescent(norene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Lucinda is not clanking. Lucinda is howling. Lucinda is ceramic. Lucinda is worn. Ricki is howling. Rudiger is not matutinal. Shana is matutinal. Young people are ceramic. All clanking people are not howling. All numinous, howling people are sunrise. If Lucinda is numinous then Lucinda is ceramic. All matutinal, sunrise people are numinous. All worn people are numinous. If Rudiger is worn and Rudiger is not howling then Rudiger is sunrise. All sunrise people are not matutinal. Ricki is not numinous.", "logic": "\nnot Clanking(lucinda)\nHowling(lucinda)\nCeramic(lucinda)\nWorn(lucinda)\nHowling(ricki)\nnot Matutinal(rudiger)\nMatutinal(shana)\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Ceramic(x))\nforall x (Clanking(x) -> not Howling(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) and Howling(x) -> Sunrise(x))\nNuminous(lucinda) -> Ceramic(lucinda)\nforall x (Matutinal(x) and Sunrise(x) -> Numinous(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Numinous(x))\nWorn(rudiger) and not Howling(rudiger) -> Sunrise(rudiger)\nforall x (Sunrise(x) -> not Matutinal(x))\n\nnot Numinous(ricki)\n\nforall x (Matutinal(x) and Sunrise(x) -> Numinous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Dionysus is not smoking. Dionysus is armed. Dionysus is hoydenish. Dionysus is branching. Pammie is armed. Therese is not flooded. Wade is flooded. Young people are hoydenish. All smoking people are not armed. All slimy, armed people are scarey. If Dionysus is slimy then Dionysus is hoydenish. All flooded, scarey people are slimy. All branching people are slimy. If Therese is branching and Therese is not armed then Therese is scarey. All scarey people are not flooded. Pammie is scarey.", "logic": "\nnot Smoking(dionysus)\nArmed(dionysus)\nHoydenish(dionysus)\nBranching(dionysus)\nArmed(pammie)\nnot Flooded(therese)\nFlooded(wade)\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Hoydenish(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) -> not Armed(x))\nforall x (Slimy(x) and Armed(x) -> Scarey(x))\nSlimy(dionysus) -> Hoydenish(dionysus)\nforall x (Flooded(x) and Scarey(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Slimy(x))\nBranching(therese) and not Armed(therese) -> Scarey(therese)\nforall x (Scarey(x) -> not Flooded(x))\n\nScarey(pammie)\n\nforall x (Slimy(x) and Armed(x) -> Scarey(x)) <- forall x (Flooded(x) and Scarey(x) -> Slimy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Rory is not tactual. Rory is boylike. Rory is rested. Rory is practiced. Sullivan is boylike. Wait is not precarious. Brandea is precarious. Young people are rested. All tactual people are not boylike. All quadruplex, boylike people are etiolated. If Rory is quadruplex then Rory is rested. All precarious, etiolated people are quadruplex. All practiced people are quadruplex. If Wait is practiced and Wait is not boylike then Wait is etiolated. All etiolated people are not precarious. Wait is not etiolated.", "logic": "\nnot Tactual(rory)\nBoylike(rory)\nRested(rory)\nPracticed(rory)\nBoylike(sullivan)\nnot Precarious(wait)\nPrecarious(brandea)\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Rested(x))\nforall x (Tactual(x) -> not Boylike(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) and Boylike(x) -> Etiolated(x))\nQuadruplex(rory) -> Rested(rory)\nforall x (Precarious(x) and Etiolated(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\nPracticed(wait) and not Boylike(wait) -> Etiolated(wait)\nforall x (Etiolated(x) -> not Precarious(x))\n\nnot Etiolated(wait)\n\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) and Boylike(x) -> Etiolated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Jayne is not licentious. Jayne is faraway. Jayne is eloquent. Jayne is unflurried. Rozelle is faraway. Adolf is not quality. Carla is quality. Young people are eloquent. All licentious people are not faraway. All scrotal, faraway people are eellike. If Jayne is scrotal then Jayne is eloquent. All quality, eellike people are scrotal. All unflurried people are scrotal. If Adolf is unflurried and Adolf is not faraway then Adolf is eellike. All eellike people are not quality. Carla is eloquent.", "logic": "\nnot Licentious(jayne)\nFaraway(jayne)\nEloquent(jayne)\nUnflurried(jayne)\nFaraway(rozelle)\nnot Quality(adolf)\nQuality(carla)\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Licentious(x) -> not Faraway(x))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) and Faraway(x) -> Eellike(x))\nScrotal(jayne) -> Eloquent(jayne)\nforall x (Quality(x) and Eellike(x) -> Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Scrotal(x))\nUnflurried(adolf) and not Faraway(adolf) -> Eellike(adolf)\nforall x (Eellike(x) -> not Quality(x))\n\nEloquent(carla)\n\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Eloquent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Dominique is not nosohusial. Dominique is sinuate. Dominique is broody. Dominique is feminine. Alejandra is sinuate. Eustace is not glamorous. Solange is glamorous. Young people are broody. All nosohusial people are not sinuate. All high, sinuate people are sequent. If Dominique is high then Dominique is broody. All glamorous, sequent people are high. All feminine people are high. If Eustace is feminine and Eustace is not sinuate then Eustace is sequent. All sequent people are not glamorous. Alejandra is not glamorous.", "logic": "\nnot Nosohusial(dominique)\nSinuate(dominique)\nBroody(dominique)\nFeminine(dominique)\nSinuate(alejandra)\nnot Glamorous(eustace)\nGlamorous(solange)\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> not Sinuate(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Sequent(x))\nHigh(dominique) -> Broody(dominique)\nforall x (Glamorous(x) and Sequent(x) -> High(x))\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> High(x))\nFeminine(eustace) and not Sinuate(eustace) -> Sequent(eustace)\nforall x (Sequent(x) -> not Glamorous(x))\n\nnot Glamorous(alejandra)\n\nnot Glamorous(alejandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Barney is not sedentary. Barney is goosey. Barney is vestmented. Barney is loved. Godwin is goosey. Cami is not nonliving. Barthel is nonliving. Young people are vestmented. All sedentary people are not goosey. All darling, goosey people are premier. If Barney is darling then Barney is vestmented. All nonliving, premier people are darling. All loved people are darling. If Cami is loved and Cami is not goosey then Cami is premier. All premier people are not nonliving. Cami is goosey.", "logic": "\nnot Sedentary(barney)\nGoosey(barney)\nVestmented(barney)\nLoved(barney)\nGoosey(godwin)\nnot Nonliving(cami)\nNonliving(barthel)\nforall x (Loved(x) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Sedentary(x) -> not Goosey(x))\nforall x (Darling(x) and Goosey(x) -> Premier(x))\nDarling(barney) -> Vestmented(barney)\nforall x (Nonliving(x) and Premier(x) -> Darling(x))\nforall x (Loved(x) -> Darling(x))\nLoved(cami) and not Goosey(cami) -> Premier(cami)\nforall x (Premier(x) -> not Nonliving(x))\n\nGoosey(cami)\n\nGoosey(cami) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Leodora is not derived. Leodora is sinning. Leodora is unpitying. Leodora is manly. Juergen is sinning. Philippa is not polemical. Loretta is polemical. Young people are unpitying. All derived people are not sinning. All activist, sinning people are fogyish. If Leodora is activist then Leodora is unpitying. All polemical, fogyish people are activist. All manly people are activist. If Philippa is manly and Philippa is not sinning then Philippa is fogyish. All fogyish people are not polemical. Loretta is not manly.", "logic": "\nnot Derived(leodora)\nSinning(leodora)\nUnpitying(leodora)\nManly(leodora)\nSinning(juergen)\nnot Polemical(philippa)\nPolemical(loretta)\nforall x (Manly(x) -> Unpitying(x))\nforall x (Derived(x) -> not Sinning(x))\nforall x (Activist(x) and Sinning(x) -> Fogyish(x))\nActivist(leodora) -> Unpitying(leodora)\nforall x (Polemical(x) and Fogyish(x) -> Activist(x))\nforall x (Manly(x) -> Activist(x))\nManly(philippa) and not Sinning(philippa) -> Fogyish(philippa)\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> not Polemical(x))\n\nnot Manly(loretta)\n\nnot Manly(loretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Nissie is not stippled. Nissie is splitting. Nissie is affiliated. Nissie is mosaic. Hurley is splitting. Kimbra is not pancreatic. Kendal is pancreatic. Young people are affiliated. All stippled people are not splitting. All acidotic, splitting people are disabused. If Nissie is acidotic then Nissie is affiliated. All pancreatic, disabused people are acidotic. All mosaic people are acidotic. If Kimbra is mosaic and Kimbra is not splitting then Kimbra is disabused. All disabused people are not pancreatic. Kendal is splitting.", "logic": "\nnot Stippled(nissie)\nSplitting(nissie)\nAffiliated(nissie)\nMosaic(nissie)\nSplitting(hurley)\nnot Pancreatic(kimbra)\nPancreatic(kendal)\nforall x (Mosaic(x) -> Affiliated(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> not Splitting(x))\nforall x (Acidotic(x) and Splitting(x) -> Disabused(x))\nAcidotic(nissie) -> Affiliated(nissie)\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) and Disabused(x) -> Acidotic(x))\nforall x (Mosaic(x) -> Acidotic(x))\nMosaic(kimbra) and not Splitting(kimbra) -> Disabused(kimbra)\nforall x (Disabused(x) -> not Pancreatic(x))\n\nSplitting(kendal)\n\nSplitting(kendal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "The marylynne is asserting. The marylynne peptize the mustafa. The mustafa joint the marylynne. If something jollify the mustafa and it jollify the marylynne then the marylynne is soprano. If something joint the marylynne then it peptize the marylynne. If something is asserting then it jollify the marylynne. If something peptize the marylynne then the marylynne joint the mustafa. If something jollify the mustafa and it jollify the marylynne then the marylynne is vibrionic. If something joint the mustafa then it jollify the mustafa. The mustafa joint the marylynne.", "logic": "\nAsserting(marylynne)\nPeptize(marylynne, mustafa)\nJoint(mustafa, marylynne)\nforall x (Jollify(x, mustafa) and Jollify(x, marylynne) -> Soprano(marylynne))\nforall x (Joint(x, marylynne) -> Peptize(x, marylynne))\nforall x (Asserting(x) -> Jollify(x, marylynne))\nforall x (Peptize(x, marylynne) -> Joint(marylynne, mustafa))\nforall x (Jollify(x, mustafa) and Jollify(x, marylynne) -> Vibrionic(marylynne))\nforall x (Joint(x, mustafa) -> Jollify(x, mustafa))\n\nJoint(mustafa, marylynne)\n\ntherefore Joint(mustafa, marylynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The lelia is duplicate. The lelia imply the shirline. The shirline implant the lelia. If something broker the shirline and it broker the lelia then the lelia is russian. If something implant the lelia then it imply the lelia. If something is duplicate then it broker the lelia. If something imply the lelia then the lelia implant the shirline. If something broker the shirline and it broker the lelia then the lelia is frigid. If something implant the shirline then it broker the shirline. The lelia is not duplicate.", "logic": "\nDuplicate(lelia)\nImply(lelia, shirline)\nImplant(shirline, lelia)\nforall x (Broker(x, shirline) and Broker(x, lelia) -> Russian(lelia))\nforall x (Implant(x, lelia) -> Imply(x, lelia))\nforall x (Duplicate(x) -> Broker(x, lelia))\nforall x (Imply(x, lelia) -> Implant(lelia, shirline))\nforall x (Broker(x, shirline) and Broker(x, lelia) -> Frigid(lelia))\nforall x (Implant(x, shirline) -> Broker(x, shirline))\n\nnot Duplicate(lelia)\n\ntherefore Duplicate(lelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The iain is caulescent. The iain deaerate the nissie. The nissie ventilate the iain. If something grey the nissie and it grey the iain then the iain is helpless. If something ventilate the iain then it deaerate the iain. If something is caulescent then it grey the iain. If something deaerate the iain then the iain ventilate the nissie. If something grey the nissie and it grey the iain then the iain is ranging. If something ventilate the nissie then it grey the nissie. The nissie deaerate the iain.", "logic": "\nCaulescent(iain)\nDeaerate(iain, nissie)\nVentilate(nissie, iain)\nforall x (Grey(x, nissie) and Grey(x, iain) -> Helpless(iain))\nforall x (Ventilate(x, iain) -> Deaerate(x, iain))\nforall x (Caulescent(x) -> Grey(x, iain))\nforall x (Deaerate(x, iain) -> Ventilate(iain, nissie))\nforall x (Grey(x, nissie) and Grey(x, iain) -> Ranging(iain))\nforall x (Ventilate(x, nissie) -> Grey(x, nissie))\n\nDeaerate(nissie, iain)\n\nVentilate(nissie, iain) and forall x (Ventilate(x, iain) -> Deaerate(x, iain)) -> therefore Deaerate(nissie, iain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The rhianna is taking. The rhianna lend the ardra. The ardra maltreat the rhianna. If something adore the ardra and it adore the rhianna then the rhianna is retral. If something maltreat the rhianna then it lend the rhianna. If something is taking then it adore the rhianna. If something lend the rhianna then the rhianna maltreat the ardra. If something adore the ardra and it adore the rhianna then the rhianna is rivalrous. If something maltreat the ardra then it adore the ardra. The ardra does not need the rhianna.", "logic": "\nTaking(rhianna)\nLend(rhianna, ardra)\nMaltreat(ardra, rhianna)\nforall x (Adore(x, ardra) and Adore(x, rhianna) -> Retral(rhianna))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, rhianna) -> Lend(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Taking(x) -> Adore(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Lend(x, rhianna) -> Maltreat(rhianna, ardra))\nforall x (Adore(x, ardra) and Adore(x, rhianna) -> Rivalrous(rhianna))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, ardra) -> Adore(x, ardra))\n\nnot Lend(ardra, rhianna)\n\nMaltreat(ardra, rhianna) and forall x (Maltreat(x, rhianna) -> Lend(x, rhianna)) -> therefore Lend(ardra, rhianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The kitti is yuman. The kitti resemble the joanie. The joanie vitriol the kitti. If something repudiate the joanie and it repudiate the kitti then the kitti is cupric. If something vitriol the kitti then it resemble the kitti. If something is yuman then it repudiate the kitti. If something resemble the kitti then the kitti vitriol the joanie. If something repudiate the joanie and it repudiate the kitti then the kitti is unbecoming. If something vitriol the joanie then it repudiate the joanie. The kitti vitriol the joanie.", "logic": "\nYuman(kitti)\nResemble(kitti, joanie)\nVitriol(joanie, kitti)\nforall x (Repudiate(x, joanie) and Repudiate(x, kitti) -> Cupric(kitti))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, kitti) -> Resemble(x, kitti))\nforall x (Yuman(x) -> Repudiate(x, kitti))\nforall x (Resemble(x, kitti) -> Vitriol(kitti, joanie))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, joanie) and Repudiate(x, kitti) -> Unbecoming(kitti))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, joanie) -> Repudiate(x, joanie))\n\nVitriol(kitti, joanie)\n\nVitriol(joanie, kitti) and forall x (Vitriol(x, kitti) -> Resemble(x, kitti)) -> therefore Resemble(joanie, kitti) Resemble(joanie, kitti) and forall x (Resemble(x, kitti) -> Vitriol(kitti, joanie)) -> therefore Vitriol(kitti, joanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The lazlo is frictional. The lazlo skim the dean. The dean skirl the lazlo. If something coldwork the dean and it coldwork the lazlo then the lazlo is illegal. If something skirl the lazlo then it skim the lazlo. If something is frictional then it coldwork the lazlo. If something skim the lazlo then the lazlo skirl the dean. If something coldwork the dean and it coldwork the lazlo then the lazlo is chockful. If something skirl the dean then it coldwork the dean. The lazlo does not like the dean.", "logic": "\nFrictional(lazlo)\nSkim(lazlo, dean)\nSkirl(dean, lazlo)\nforall x (Coldwork(x, dean) and Coldwork(x, lazlo) -> Illegal(lazlo))\nforall x (Skirl(x, lazlo) -> Skim(x, lazlo))\nforall x (Frictional(x) -> Coldwork(x, lazlo))\nforall x (Skim(x, lazlo) -> Skirl(lazlo, dean))\nforall x (Coldwork(x, dean) and Coldwork(x, lazlo) -> Chockful(lazlo))\nforall x (Skirl(x, dean) -> Coldwork(x, dean))\n\nnot Skirl(lazlo, dean)\n\nSkirl(dean, lazlo) and forall x (Skirl(x, lazlo) -> Skim(x, lazlo)) -> therefore Skim(dean, lazlo) Skim(dean, lazlo) and forall x (Skim(x, lazlo) -> Skirl(lazlo, dean)) -> therefore Skirl(lazlo, dean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The idelle is fatigued. The idelle adore the sumner. The sumner bead the idelle. If something unicycle the sumner and it unicycle the idelle then the idelle is attendant. If something bead the idelle then it adore the idelle. If something is fatigued then it unicycle the idelle. If something adore the idelle then the idelle bead the sumner. If something unicycle the sumner and it unicycle the idelle then the idelle is blithe. If something bead the sumner then it unicycle the sumner. The idelle unicycle the sumner.", "logic": "\nFatigued(idelle)\nAdore(idelle, sumner)\nBead(sumner, idelle)\nforall x (Unicycle(x, sumner) and Unicycle(x, idelle) -> Attendant(idelle))\nforall x (Bead(x, idelle) -> Adore(x, idelle))\nforall x (Fatigued(x) -> Unicycle(x, idelle))\nforall x (Adore(x, idelle) -> Bead(idelle, sumner))\nforall x (Unicycle(x, sumner) and Unicycle(x, idelle) -> Blithe(idelle))\nforall x (Bead(x, sumner) -> Unicycle(x, sumner))\n\nUnicycle(idelle, sumner)\n\nBead(sumner, idelle) and forall x (Bead(x, idelle) -> Adore(x, idelle)) -> therefore Adore(sumner, idelle) Adore(sumner, idelle) and forall x (Adore(x, idelle) -> Bead(idelle, sumner)) -> therefore Bead(idelle, sumner) Bead(idelle, sumner) and forall x (Bead(x, sumner) -> Unicycle(x, sumner)) -> therefore Unicycle(idelle, sumner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The julissa is contrabass. The julissa burglarise the nerti. The nerti brooch the julissa. If something delete the nerti and it delete the julissa then the julissa is hatched. If something brooch the julissa then it burglarise the julissa. If something is contrabass then it delete the julissa. If something burglarise the julissa then the julissa brooch the nerti. If something delete the nerti and it delete the julissa then the julissa is endurable. If something brooch the nerti then it delete the nerti. The julissa does not chase the nerti.", "logic": "\nContrabass(julissa)\nBurglarise(julissa, nerti)\nBrooch(nerti, julissa)\nforall x (Delete(x, nerti) and Delete(x, julissa) -> Hatched(julissa))\nforall x (Brooch(x, julissa) -> Burglarise(x, julissa))\nforall x (Contrabass(x) -> Delete(x, julissa))\nforall x (Burglarise(x, julissa) -> Brooch(julissa, nerti))\nforall x (Delete(x, nerti) and Delete(x, julissa) -> Endurable(julissa))\nforall x (Brooch(x, nerti) -> Delete(x, nerti))\n\nnot Delete(julissa, nerti)\n\nBrooch(nerti, julissa) and forall x (Brooch(x, julissa) -> Burglarise(x, julissa)) -> therefore Burglarise(nerti, julissa) Burglarise(nerti, julissa) and forall x (Burglarise(x, julissa) -> Brooch(julissa, nerti)) -> therefore Brooch(julissa, nerti) Brooch(julissa, nerti) and forall x (Brooch(x, nerti) -> Delete(x, nerti)) -> therefore Delete(julissa, nerti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The barnard is womanly. The barnard unbridle the alexei. The alexei disgust the barnard. If something traduce the alexei and it traduce the barnard then the barnard is tender. If something disgust the barnard then it unbridle the barnard. If something is womanly then it traduce the barnard. If something unbridle the barnard then the barnard disgust the alexei. If something traduce the alexei and it traduce the barnard then the barnard is uncarved. If something disgust the alexei then it traduce the alexei. The alexei does not chase the barnard.", "logic": "\nWomanly(barnard)\nUnbridle(barnard, alexei)\nDisgust(alexei, barnard)\nforall x (Traduce(x, alexei) and Traduce(x, barnard) -> Tender(barnard))\nforall x (Disgust(x, barnard) -> Unbridle(x, barnard))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Traduce(x, barnard))\nforall x (Unbridle(x, barnard) -> Disgust(barnard, alexei))\nforall x (Traduce(x, alexei) and Traduce(x, barnard) -> Uncarved(barnard))\nforall x (Disgust(x, alexei) -> Traduce(x, alexei))\n\nnot Traduce(alexei, barnard)\n\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Traduce(x, barnard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The erik is sketchy. The erik ambush the cristal. The cristal saunter the erik. If something assimilate the cristal and it assimilate the erik then the erik is elaborated. If something saunter the erik then it ambush the erik. If something is sketchy then it assimilate the erik. If something ambush the erik then the erik saunter the cristal. If something assimilate the cristal and it assimilate the erik then the erik is leathered. If something saunter the cristal then it assimilate the cristal. The erik ambush the erik.", "logic": "\nSketchy(erik)\nAmbush(erik, cristal)\nSaunter(cristal, erik)\nforall x (Assimilate(x, cristal) and Assimilate(x, erik) -> Elaborated(erik))\nforall x (Saunter(x, erik) -> Ambush(x, erik))\nforall x (Sketchy(x) -> Assimilate(x, erik))\nforall x (Ambush(x, erik) -> Saunter(erik, cristal))\nforall x (Assimilate(x, cristal) and Assimilate(x, erik) -> Leathered(erik))\nforall x (Saunter(x, cristal) -> Assimilate(x, cristal))\n\nAmbush(erik, erik)\n\nforall x (Saunter(x, erik) -> Ambush(x, erik)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The eda is downy. The eda bonk the karyn. The karyn shanghai the eda. If something batch the karyn and it batch the eda then the eda is atoxic. If something shanghai the eda then it bonk the eda. If something is downy then it batch the eda. If something bonk the eda then the eda shanghai the karyn. If something batch the karyn and it batch the eda then the eda is jellylike. If something shanghai the karyn then it batch the karyn. The karyn does not chase the karyn.", "logic": "\nDowny(eda)\nBonk(eda, karyn)\nShanghai(karyn, eda)\nforall x (Batch(x, karyn) and Batch(x, eda) -> Atoxic(eda))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, eda) -> Bonk(x, eda))\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Batch(x, eda))\nforall x (Bonk(x, eda) -> Shanghai(eda, karyn))\nforall x (Batch(x, karyn) and Batch(x, eda) -> Jellylike(eda))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, karyn) -> Batch(x, karyn))\n\nnot Batch(karyn, karyn)\n\nforall x (Shanghai(x, karyn) -> Batch(x, karyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The rogers is hotheaded. The rogers fetishize the joslyn. The joslyn locomote the rogers. If something chop the joslyn and it chop the rogers then the rogers is anginal. If something locomote the rogers then it fetishize the rogers. If something is hotheaded then it chop the rogers. If something fetishize the rogers then the rogers locomote the joslyn. If something chop the joslyn and it chop the rogers then the rogers is cockeyed. If something locomote the joslyn then it chop the joslyn. The joslyn is anginal.", "logic": "\nHotheaded(rogers)\nFetishize(rogers, joslyn)\nLocomote(joslyn, rogers)\nforall x (Chop(x, joslyn) and Chop(x, rogers) -> Anginal(rogers))\nforall x (Locomote(x, rogers) -> Fetishize(x, rogers))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Chop(x, rogers))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, rogers) -> Locomote(rogers, joslyn))\nforall x (Chop(x, joslyn) and Chop(x, rogers) -> Cockeyed(rogers))\nforall x (Locomote(x, joslyn) -> Chop(x, joslyn))\n\nAnginal(joslyn)\n\nAnginal(joslyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The henry is tranquil. The henry trash the berty. The berty draw the henry. If something sabre the berty and it sabre the henry then the henry is potent. If something draw the henry then it trash the henry. If something is tranquil then it sabre the henry. If something trash the henry then the henry draw the berty. If something sabre the berty and it sabre the henry then the henry is corporeal. If something draw the berty then it sabre the berty. The henry is not green.", "logic": "\nTranquil(henry)\nTrash(henry, berty)\nDraw(berty, henry)\nforall x (Sabre(x, berty) and Sabre(x, henry) -> Potent(henry))\nforall x (Draw(x, henry) -> Trash(x, henry))\nforall x (Tranquil(x) -> Sabre(x, henry))\nforall x (Trash(x, henry) -> Draw(henry, berty))\nforall x (Sabre(x, berty) and Sabre(x, henry) -> Corporeal(henry))\nforall x (Draw(x, berty) -> Sabre(x, berty))\n\nnot Green(henry)\n\nnot Green(henry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The essa is obedient. The essa astonish the christin. The christin expend the essa. If something claim the christin and it claim the essa then the essa is offhanded. If something expend the essa then it astonish the essa. If something is obedient then it claim the essa. If something astonish the essa then the essa expend the christin. If something claim the christin and it claim the essa then the essa is droll. If something expend the christin then it claim the christin. The christin is obedient.", "logic": "\nObedient(essa)\nAstonish(essa, christin)\nExpend(christin, essa)\nforall x (Claim(x, christin) and Claim(x, essa) -> Offhanded(essa))\nforall x (Expend(x, essa) -> Astonish(x, essa))\nforall x (Obedient(x) -> Claim(x, essa))\nforall x (Astonish(x, essa) -> Expend(essa, christin))\nforall x (Claim(x, christin) and Claim(x, essa) -> Droll(essa))\nforall x (Expend(x, christin) -> Claim(x, christin))\n\nObedient(christin)\n\nObedient(christin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The raymundo is lxxv. The raymundo trench the tabbie. The tabbie overtrump the raymundo. If something combine the tabbie and it combine the raymundo then the raymundo is touristed. If something overtrump the raymundo then it trench the raymundo. If something is lxxv then it combine the raymundo. If something trench the raymundo then the raymundo overtrump the tabbie. If something combine the tabbie and it combine the raymundo then the raymundo is florid. If something overtrump the tabbie then it combine the tabbie. The tabbie does not need the tabbie.", "logic": "\nLxxv(raymundo)\nTrench(raymundo, tabbie)\nOvertrump(tabbie, raymundo)\nforall x (Combine(x, tabbie) and Combine(x, raymundo) -> Touristed(raymundo))\nforall x (Overtrump(x, raymundo) -> Trench(x, raymundo))\nforall x (Lxxv(x) -> Combine(x, raymundo))\nforall x (Trench(x, raymundo) -> Overtrump(raymundo, tabbie))\nforall x (Combine(x, tabbie) and Combine(x, raymundo) -> Florid(raymundo))\nforall x (Overtrump(x, tabbie) -> Combine(x, tabbie))\n\nnot Trench(tabbie, tabbie)\n\nnot Trench(tabbie, tabbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The kingsly is tetragonal. The kingsly know the marisa. The marisa underprice the kingsly. If something rummage the marisa and it rummage the kingsly then the kingsly is mangy. If something underprice the kingsly then it know the kingsly. If something is tetragonal then it rummage the kingsly. If something know the kingsly then the kingsly underprice the marisa. If something rummage the marisa and it rummage the kingsly then the kingsly is avenged. If something underprice the marisa then it rummage the marisa. The marisa is green.", "logic": "\nTetragonal(kingsly)\nKnow(kingsly, marisa)\nUnderprice(marisa, kingsly)\nforall x (Rummage(x, marisa) and Rummage(x, kingsly) -> Mangy(kingsly))\nforall x (Underprice(x, kingsly) -> Know(x, kingsly))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) -> Rummage(x, kingsly))\nforall x (Know(x, kingsly) -> Underprice(kingsly, marisa))\nforall x (Rummage(x, marisa) and Rummage(x, kingsly) -> Avenged(kingsly))\nforall x (Underprice(x, marisa) -> Rummage(x, marisa))\n\nGreen(marisa)\n\nGreen(marisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The nadean is marbleised. The odelinda fluster the faydra. The florry whelp the nadean. The faydra glamourise the florry. If something fluster the odelinda and the odelinda is impenitent then it glamourise the florry. If something glamourise the nadean and it is dermic then it whelp the odelinda. If something fluster the nadean then it is exportable. If something is harmonized then it glamourise the florry. If something whelp the florry then it is harmonized. If something is exportable and it glamourise the faydra then it fluster the odelinda. If something whelp the nadean then it whelp the florry. If something glamourise the nadean then the nadean glamourise the faydra. The faydra glamourise the florry.", "logic": "\nMarbleised(nadean)\nFluster(odelinda, faydra)\nWhelp(florry, nadean)\nGlamourise(faydra, florry)\nforall x (Fluster(x, odelinda) and Impenitent(odelinda) -> Glamourise(x, florry))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, nadean) and Dermic(x) -> Whelp(x, odelinda))\nforall x (Fluster(x, nadean) -> Exportable(x))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) -> Glamourise(x, florry))\nforall x (Whelp(x, florry) -> Harmonized(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) and Glamourise(x, faydra) -> Fluster(x, odelinda))\nforall x (Whelp(x, nadean) -> Whelp(x, florry))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, nadean) -> Glamourise(nadean, faydra))\n\nGlamourise(faydra, florry)\n\ntherefore Glamourise(faydra, florry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The tish is bronchitic. The amelita streak the linda. The corella facilitate the tish. The linda glorify the corella. If something streak the amelita and the amelita is illusional then it glorify the corella. If something glorify the tish and it is wordy then it facilitate the amelita. If something streak the tish then it is sternal. If something is outsized then it glorify the corella. If something facilitate the corella then it is outsized. If something is sternal and it glorify the linda then it streak the amelita. If something facilitate the tish then it facilitate the corella. If something glorify the tish then the tish glorify the linda. The linda does not like the corella.", "logic": "\nBronchitic(tish)\nStreak(amelita, linda)\nFacilitate(corella, tish)\nGlorify(linda, corella)\nforall x (Streak(x, amelita) and Illusional(amelita) -> Glorify(x, corella))\nforall x (Glorify(x, tish) and Wordy(x) -> Facilitate(x, amelita))\nforall x (Streak(x, tish) -> Sternal(x))\nforall x (Outsized(x) -> Glorify(x, corella))\nforall x (Facilitate(x, corella) -> Outsized(x))\nforall x (Sternal(x) and Glorify(x, linda) -> Streak(x, amelita))\nforall x (Facilitate(x, tish) -> Facilitate(x, corella))\nforall x (Glorify(x, tish) -> Glorify(tish, linda))\n\nnot Glorify(linda, corella)\n\ntherefore Glorify(linda, corella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The darrin is pejorative. The gladys formicate the ramona. The daisi stew the darrin. The ramona mimeo the daisi. If something formicate the gladys and the gladys is grazed then it mimeo the daisi. If something mimeo the darrin and it is sunlit then it stew the gladys. If something formicate the darrin then it is serious. If something is dicky then it mimeo the daisi. If something stew the daisi then it is dicky. If something is serious and it mimeo the ramona then it formicate the gladys. If something stew the darrin then it stew the daisi. If something mimeo the darrin then the darrin mimeo the ramona. The daisi stew the daisi.", "logic": "\nPejorative(darrin)\nFormicate(gladys, ramona)\nStew(daisi, darrin)\nMimeo(ramona, daisi)\nforall x (Formicate(x, gladys) and Grazed(gladys) -> Mimeo(x, daisi))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, darrin) and Sunlit(x) -> Stew(x, gladys))\nforall x (Formicate(x, darrin) -> Serious(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Mimeo(x, daisi))\nforall x (Stew(x, daisi) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Serious(x) and Mimeo(x, ramona) -> Formicate(x, gladys))\nforall x (Stew(x, darrin) -> Stew(x, daisi))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, darrin) -> Mimeo(darrin, ramona))\n\nStew(daisi, daisi)\n\nStew(daisi, darrin) and forall x (Stew(x, darrin) -> Stew(x, daisi)) -> therefore Stew(daisi, daisi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The catha is speckled. The helaine raze the brita. The jess mutate the catha. The brita pretend the jess. If something raze the helaine and the helaine is semestral then it pretend the jess. If something pretend the catha and it is stripy then it mutate the helaine. If something raze the catha then it is unstable. If something is unbraced then it pretend the jess. If something mutate the jess then it is unbraced. If something is unstable and it pretend the brita then it raze the helaine. If something mutate the catha then it mutate the jess. If something pretend the catha then the catha pretend the brita. The jess does not visit the jess.", "logic": "\nSpeckled(catha)\nRaze(helaine, brita)\nMutate(jess, catha)\nPretend(brita, jess)\nforall x (Raze(x, helaine) and Semestral(helaine) -> Pretend(x, jess))\nforall x (Pretend(x, catha) and Stripy(x) -> Mutate(x, helaine))\nforall x (Raze(x, catha) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Pretend(x, jess))\nforall x (Mutate(x, jess) -> Unbraced(x))\nforall x (Unstable(x) and Pretend(x, brita) -> Raze(x, helaine))\nforall x (Mutate(x, catha) -> Mutate(x, jess))\nforall x (Pretend(x, catha) -> Pretend(catha, brita))\n\nnot Mutate(jess, jess)\n\nMutate(jess, catha) and forall x (Mutate(x, catha) -> Mutate(x, jess)) -> therefore Mutate(jess, jess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The jammie is anxious. The gerrit mould the angeline. The florie dropkick the jammie. The angeline exsert the florie. If something mould the gerrit and the gerrit is asynergic then it exsert the florie. If something exsert the jammie and it is degraded then it dropkick the gerrit. If something mould the jammie then it is crustal. If something is opaque then it exsert the florie. If something dropkick the florie then it is opaque. If something is crustal and it exsert the angeline then it mould the gerrit. If something dropkick the jammie then it dropkick the florie. If something exsert the jammie then the jammie exsert the angeline. The florie is opaque.", "logic": "\nAnxious(jammie)\nMould(gerrit, angeline)\nDropkick(florie, jammie)\nExsert(angeline, florie)\nforall x (Mould(x, gerrit) and Asynergic(gerrit) -> Exsert(x, florie))\nforall x (Exsert(x, jammie) and Degraded(x) -> Dropkick(x, gerrit))\nforall x (Mould(x, jammie) -> Crustal(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) -> Exsert(x, florie))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, florie) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) and Exsert(x, angeline) -> Mould(x, gerrit))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, jammie) -> Dropkick(x, florie))\nforall x (Exsert(x, jammie) -> Exsert(jammie, angeline))\n\nOpaque(florie)\n\nDropkick(florie, jammie) and forall x (Dropkick(x, jammie) -> Dropkick(x, florie)) -> therefore Dropkick(florie, florie) Dropkick(florie, florie) and forall x (Dropkick(x, florie) -> Opaque(x)) -> therefore Opaque(florie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The gilda is laureate. The valina upheave the les. The amalea expel the gilda. The les handwash the amalea. If something upheave the valina and the valina is pencilled then it handwash the amalea. If something handwash the gilda and it is glassless then it expel the valina. If something upheave the gilda then it is maimed. If something is goddamn then it handwash the amalea. If something expel the amalea then it is goddamn. If something is maimed and it handwash the les then it upheave the valina. If something expel the gilda then it expel the amalea. If something handwash the gilda then the gilda handwash the les. The amalea is not goddamn.", "logic": "\nLaureate(gilda)\nUpheave(valina, les)\nExpel(amalea, gilda)\nHandwash(les, amalea)\nforall x (Upheave(x, valina) and Pencilled(valina) -> Handwash(x, amalea))\nforall x (Handwash(x, gilda) and Glassless(x) -> Expel(x, valina))\nforall x (Upheave(x, gilda) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Goddamn(x) -> Handwash(x, amalea))\nforall x (Expel(x, amalea) -> Goddamn(x))\nforall x (Maimed(x) and Handwash(x, les) -> Upheave(x, valina))\nforall x (Expel(x, gilda) -> Expel(x, amalea))\nforall x (Handwash(x, gilda) -> Handwash(gilda, les))\n\nnot Goddamn(amalea)\n\nExpel(amalea, gilda) and forall x (Expel(x, gilda) -> Expel(x, amalea)) -> therefore Expel(amalea, amalea) Expel(amalea, amalea) and forall x (Expel(x, amalea) -> Goddamn(x)) -> therefore Goddamn(amalea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The bartel is prenuptial. The acacia enrol the oren. The emeline solemnize the bartel. The oren ballyhoo the emeline. If something enrol the acacia and the acacia is untufted then it ballyhoo the emeline. If something ballyhoo the bartel and it is contracted then it solemnize the acacia. If something enrol the bartel then it is mincing. If something is rolling then it ballyhoo the emeline. If something solemnize the emeline then it is rolling. If something is mincing and it ballyhoo the oren then it enrol the acacia. If something solemnize the bartel then it solemnize the emeline. If something ballyhoo the bartel then the bartel ballyhoo the oren. The emeline ballyhoo the emeline.", "logic": "\nPrenuptial(bartel)\nEnrol(acacia, oren)\nSolemnize(emeline, bartel)\nBallyhoo(oren, emeline)\nforall x (Enrol(x, acacia) and Untufted(acacia) -> Ballyhoo(x, emeline))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, bartel) and Contracted(x) -> Solemnize(x, acacia))\nforall x (Enrol(x, bartel) -> Mincing(x))\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Ballyhoo(x, emeline))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, emeline) -> Rolling(x))\nforall x (Mincing(x) and Ballyhoo(x, oren) -> Enrol(x, acacia))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, bartel) -> Solemnize(x, emeline))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, bartel) -> Ballyhoo(bartel, oren))\n\nBallyhoo(emeline, emeline)\n\nSolemnize(emeline, bartel) and forall x (Solemnize(x, bartel) -> Solemnize(x, emeline)) -> therefore Solemnize(emeline, emeline) Solemnize(emeline, emeline) and forall x (Solemnize(x, emeline) -> Rolling(x)) -> therefore Rolling(emeline) Rolling(emeline) and forall x (Rolling(x) -> Ballyhoo(x, emeline)) -> therefore Ballyhoo(emeline, emeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The christan is brut. The leanne robe the beilul. The salome effuse the christan. The beilul donate the salome. If something robe the leanne and the leanne is depressant then it donate the salome. If something donate the christan and it is botryoidal then it effuse the leanne. If something robe the christan then it is reflecting. If something is classic then it donate the salome. If something effuse the salome then it is classic. If something is reflecting and it donate the beilul then it robe the leanne. If something effuse the christan then it effuse the salome. If something donate the christan then the christan donate the beilul. The salome does not like the salome.", "logic": "\nBrut(christan)\nRobe(leanne, beilul)\nEffuse(salome, christan)\nDonate(beilul, salome)\nforall x (Robe(x, leanne) and Depressant(leanne) -> Donate(x, salome))\nforall x (Donate(x, christan) and Botryoidal(x) -> Effuse(x, leanne))\nforall x (Robe(x, christan) -> Reflecting(x))\nforall x (Classic(x) -> Donate(x, salome))\nforall x (Effuse(x, salome) -> Classic(x))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Donate(x, beilul) -> Robe(x, leanne))\nforall x (Effuse(x, christan) -> Effuse(x, salome))\nforall x (Donate(x, christan) -> Donate(christan, beilul))\n\nnot Donate(salome, salome)\n\nEffuse(salome, christan) and forall x (Effuse(x, christan) -> Effuse(x, salome)) -> therefore Effuse(salome, salome) Effuse(salome, salome) and forall x (Effuse(x, salome) -> Classic(x)) -> therefore Classic(salome) Classic(salome) and forall x (Classic(x) -> Donate(x, salome)) -> therefore Donate(salome, salome)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The friedrick is topknotted. The florence conn the beilul. The wayne taboo the friedrick. The beilul displease the wayne. If something conn the florence and the florence is arcuate then it displease the wayne. If something displease the friedrick and it is arcuate then it taboo the florence. If something conn the friedrick then it is cerulean. If something is crumpled then it displease the wayne. If something taboo the wayne then it is crumpled. If something is cerulean and it displease the beilul then it conn the florence. If something taboo the friedrick then it taboo the wayne. If something displease the friedrick then the friedrick displease the beilul. The friedrick is not cerulean.", "logic": "\nTopknotted(friedrick)\nConn(florence, beilul)\nTaboo(wayne, friedrick)\nDisplease(beilul, wayne)\nforall x (Conn(x, florence) and Arcuate(florence) -> Displease(x, wayne))\nforall x (Displease(x, friedrick) and Arcuate(x) -> Taboo(x, florence))\nforall x (Conn(x, friedrick) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) -> Displease(x, wayne))\nforall x (Taboo(x, wayne) -> Crumpled(x))\nforall x (Cerulean(x) and Displease(x, beilul) -> Conn(x, florence))\nforall x (Taboo(x, friedrick) -> Taboo(x, wayne))\nforall x (Displease(x, friedrick) -> Displease(friedrick, beilul))\n\nnot Cerulean(friedrick)\n\nforall x (Conn(x, friedrick) -> Cerulean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The nonnah is mozartian. The cathryn coexist the storey. The garrett scold the nonnah. The storey sphacelate the garrett. If something coexist the cathryn and the cathryn is european then it sphacelate the garrett. If something sphacelate the nonnah and it is vaginal then it scold the cathryn. If something coexist the nonnah then it is brushy. If something is atactic then it sphacelate the garrett. If something scold the garrett then it is atactic. If something is brushy and it sphacelate the storey then it coexist the cathryn. If something scold the nonnah then it scold the garrett. If something sphacelate the nonnah then the nonnah sphacelate the storey. The nonnah sphacelate the garrett.", "logic": "\nMozartian(nonnah)\nCoexist(cathryn, storey)\nScold(garrett, nonnah)\nSphacelate(storey, garrett)\nforall x (Coexist(x, cathryn) and European(cathryn) -> Sphacelate(x, garrett))\nforall x (Sphacelate(x, nonnah) and Vaginal(x) -> Scold(x, cathryn))\nforall x (Coexist(x, nonnah) -> Brushy(x))\nforall x (Atactic(x) -> Sphacelate(x, garrett))\nforall x (Scold(x, garrett) -> Atactic(x))\nforall x (Brushy(x) and Sphacelate(x, storey) -> Coexist(x, cathryn))\nforall x (Scold(x, nonnah) -> Scold(x, garrett))\nforall x (Sphacelate(x, nonnah) -> Sphacelate(nonnah, storey))\n\nSphacelate(nonnah, garrett)\n\nforall x (Atactic(x) -> Sphacelate(x, garrett)) <- forall x (Scold(x, garrett) -> Atactic(x)) <- forall x (Scold(x, nonnah) -> Scold(x, garrett)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The aldo is fatal. The regine dateline the roseanne. The lindsey retaliate the aldo. The roseanne groin the lindsey. If something dateline the regine and the regine is avionic then it groin the lindsey. If something groin the aldo and it is semite then it retaliate the regine. If something dateline the aldo then it is conducive. If something is eyed then it groin the lindsey. If something retaliate the lindsey then it is eyed. If something is conducive and it groin the roseanne then it dateline the regine. If something retaliate the aldo then it retaliate the lindsey. If something groin the aldo then the aldo groin the roseanne. The aldo does not like the roseanne.", "logic": "\nFatal(aldo)\nDateline(regine, roseanne)\nRetaliate(lindsey, aldo)\nGroin(roseanne, lindsey)\nforall x (Dateline(x, regine) and Avionic(regine) -> Groin(x, lindsey))\nforall x (Groin(x, aldo) and Semite(x) -> Retaliate(x, regine))\nforall x (Dateline(x, aldo) -> Conducive(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Groin(x, lindsey))\nforall x (Retaliate(x, lindsey) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Conducive(x) and Groin(x, roseanne) -> Dateline(x, regine))\nforall x (Retaliate(x, aldo) -> Retaliate(x, lindsey))\nforall x (Groin(x, aldo) -> Groin(aldo, roseanne))\n\nnot Groin(aldo, roseanne)\n\nforall x (Groin(x, aldo) -> Groin(aldo, roseanne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The oliy is empurpled. The myron chirr the shandie. The martainn fress the oliy. The shandie imbricate the martainn. If something chirr the myron and the myron is vinous then it imbricate the martainn. If something imbricate the oliy and it is myotonic then it fress the myron. If something chirr the oliy then it is sobering. If something is cased then it imbricate the martainn. If something fress the martainn then it is cased. If something is sobering and it imbricate the shandie then it chirr the myron. If something fress the oliy then it fress the martainn. If something imbricate the oliy then the oliy imbricate the shandie. The myron is sobering.", "logic": "\nEmpurpled(oliy)\nChirr(myron, shandie)\nFress(martainn, oliy)\nImbricate(shandie, martainn)\nforall x (Chirr(x, myron) and Vinous(myron) -> Imbricate(x, martainn))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, oliy) and Myotonic(x) -> Fress(x, myron))\nforall x (Chirr(x, oliy) -> Sobering(x))\nforall x (Cased(x) -> Imbricate(x, martainn))\nforall x (Fress(x, martainn) -> Cased(x))\nforall x (Sobering(x) and Imbricate(x, shandie) -> Chirr(x, myron))\nforall x (Fress(x, oliy) -> Fress(x, martainn))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, oliy) -> Imbricate(oliy, shandie))\n\nSobering(myron)\n\nforall x (Chirr(x, oliy) -> Sobering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The estele is purple. The eadith retrain the zaria. The nela overdo the estele. The zaria backstitch the nela. If something retrain the eadith and the eadith is ocular then it backstitch the nela. If something backstitch the estele and it is putrescent then it overdo the eadith. If something retrain the estele then it is unbrushed. If something is celibate then it backstitch the nela. If something overdo the nela then it is celibate. If something is unbrushed and it backstitch the zaria then it retrain the eadith. If something overdo the estele then it overdo the nela. If something backstitch the estele then the estele backstitch the zaria. The zaria does not chase the zaria.", "logic": "\nPurple(estele)\nRetrain(eadith, zaria)\nOverdo(nela, estele)\nBackstitch(zaria, nela)\nforall x (Retrain(x, eadith) and Ocular(eadith) -> Backstitch(x, nela))\nforall x (Backstitch(x, estele) and Putrescent(x) -> Overdo(x, eadith))\nforall x (Retrain(x, estele) -> Unbrushed(x))\nforall x (Celibate(x) -> Backstitch(x, nela))\nforall x (Overdo(x, nela) -> Celibate(x))\nforall x (Unbrushed(x) and Backstitch(x, zaria) -> Retrain(x, eadith))\nforall x (Overdo(x, estele) -> Overdo(x, nela))\nforall x (Backstitch(x, estele) -> Backstitch(estele, zaria))\n\nnot Retrain(zaria, zaria)\n\nnot Retrain(zaria, zaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The georgette is gloved. The fredia blitzkrieg the sandro. The danyette inculcate the georgette. The sandro retch the danyette. If something blitzkrieg the fredia and the fredia is mythic then it retch the danyette. If something retch the georgette and it is amatory then it inculcate the fredia. If something blitzkrieg the georgette then it is abreast. If something is vincible then it retch the danyette. If something inculcate the danyette then it is vincible. If something is abreast and it retch the sandro then it blitzkrieg the fredia. If something inculcate the georgette then it inculcate the danyette. If something retch the georgette then the georgette retch the sandro. The danyette retch the georgette.", "logic": "\nGloved(georgette)\nBlitzkrieg(fredia, sandro)\nInculcate(danyette, georgette)\nRetch(sandro, danyette)\nforall x (Blitzkrieg(x, fredia) and Mythic(fredia) -> Retch(x, danyette))\nforall x (Retch(x, georgette) and Amatory(x) -> Inculcate(x, fredia))\nforall x (Blitzkrieg(x, georgette) -> Abreast(x))\nforall x (Vincible(x) -> Retch(x, danyette))\nforall x (Inculcate(x, danyette) -> Vincible(x))\nforall x (Abreast(x) and Retch(x, sandro) -> Blitzkrieg(x, fredia))\nforall x (Inculcate(x, georgette) -> Inculcate(x, danyette))\nforall x (Retch(x, georgette) -> Retch(georgette, sandro))\n\nRetch(danyette, georgette)\n\nRetch(danyette, georgette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The bunny is pardonable. The cobbie slabber the blanche. The amalee conk the bunny. The blanche require the amalee. If something slabber the cobbie and the cobbie is subtropic then it require the amalee. If something require the bunny and it is mutualist then it conk the cobbie. If something slabber the bunny then it is parturient. If something is formless then it require the amalee. If something conk the amalee then it is formless. If something is parturient and it require the blanche then it slabber the cobbie. If something conk the bunny then it conk the amalee. If something require the bunny then the bunny require the blanche. The blanche does not chase the amalee.", "logic": "\nPardonable(bunny)\nSlabber(cobbie, blanche)\nConk(amalee, bunny)\nRequire(blanche, amalee)\nforall x (Slabber(x, cobbie) and Subtropic(cobbie) -> Require(x, amalee))\nforall x (Require(x, bunny) and Mutualist(x) -> Conk(x, cobbie))\nforall x (Slabber(x, bunny) -> Parturient(x))\nforall x (Formless(x) -> Require(x, amalee))\nforall x (Conk(x, amalee) -> Formless(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) and Require(x, blanche) -> Slabber(x, cobbie))\nforall x (Conk(x, bunny) -> Conk(x, amalee))\nforall x (Require(x, bunny) -> Require(bunny, blanche))\n\nnot Slabber(blanche, amalee)\n\nnot Slabber(blanche, amalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The lezlie is seagoing. The jessamine unbutton the mathias. The helene distemper the lezlie. The mathias agnize the helene. If something unbutton the jessamine and the jessamine is arched then it agnize the helene. If something agnize the lezlie and it is dotty then it distemper the jessamine. If something unbutton the lezlie then it is inhalant. If something is horrific then it agnize the helene. If something distemper the helene then it is horrific. If something is inhalant and it agnize the mathias then it unbutton the jessamine. If something distemper the lezlie then it distemper the helene. If something agnize the lezlie then the lezlie agnize the mathias. The lezlie unbutton the lezlie.", "logic": "\nSeagoing(lezlie)\nUnbutton(jessamine, mathias)\nDistemper(helene, lezlie)\nAgnize(mathias, helene)\nforall x (Unbutton(x, jessamine) and Arched(jessamine) -> Agnize(x, helene))\nforall x (Agnize(x, lezlie) and Dotty(x) -> Distemper(x, jessamine))\nforall x (Unbutton(x, lezlie) -> Inhalant(x))\nforall x (Horrific(x) -> Agnize(x, helene))\nforall x (Distemper(x, helene) -> Horrific(x))\nforall x (Inhalant(x) and Agnize(x, mathias) -> Unbutton(x, jessamine))\nforall x (Distemper(x, lezlie) -> Distemper(x, helene))\nforall x (Agnize(x, lezlie) -> Agnize(lezlie, mathias))\n\nUnbutton(lezlie, lezlie)\n\nUnbutton(lezlie, lezlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The roxi is earliest. If someone is petaloid then they are mysophobic. If someone is petaloid and strait then they are earliest. All earliest people are unchaste. Kind people are strait. Young people are strait. If someone is unchaste then they are petaloid. All petaloid, earliest people are mysophobic. If someone is earliest and petaloid then they are strait. The roxi is earliest.", "logic": "\nEarliest(roxi)\nforall x (Petaloid(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Petaloid(x) and Strait(x) -> Earliest(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Mysophobic(x) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Petaloid(x) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) -> Petaloid(x))\nforall x (Petaloid(x) and Earliest(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) and Petaloid(x) -> Strait(x))\n\nEarliest(roxi)\n\ntherefore Earliest(roxi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The minetta is ungual. If someone is panoramic then they are gauche. If someone is panoramic and evergreen then they are ungual. All ungual people are licit. Kind people are evergreen. Young people are evergreen. If someone is licit then they are panoramic. All panoramic, ungual people are gauche. If someone is ungual and panoramic then they are evergreen. The minetta is not ungual.", "logic": "\nUngual(minetta)\nforall x (Panoramic(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) and Evergreen(x) -> Ungual(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) -> Licit(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Evergreen(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) -> Evergreen(x))\nforall x (Licit(x) -> Panoramic(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) and Ungual(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) and Panoramic(x) -> Evergreen(x))\n\nnot Ungual(minetta)\n\ntherefore Ungual(minetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The celestia is unfed. If someone is omani then they are platonic. If someone is omani and unlabeled then they are unfed. All unfed people are repand. Kind people are unlabeled. Young people are unlabeled. If someone is repand then they are omani. All omani, unfed people are platonic. If someone is unfed and omani then they are unlabeled. The celestia is repand.", "logic": "\nUnfed(celestia)\nforall x (Omani(x) -> Platonic(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) and Unlabeled(x) -> Unfed(x))\nforall x (Unfed(x) -> Repand(x))\nforall x (Platonic(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\nforall x (Repand(x) -> Omani(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) and Unfed(x) -> Platonic(x))\nforall x (Unfed(x) and Omani(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\n\nRepand(celestia)\n\nUnfed(celestia) and forall x (Unfed(x) -> Repand(x)) -> therefore Repand(celestia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The stafani is arcane. If someone is spanish then they are bunchy. If someone is spanish and peltate then they are arcane. All arcane people are fusible. Kind people are peltate. Young people are peltate. If someone is fusible then they are spanish. All spanish, arcane people are bunchy. If someone is arcane and spanish then they are peltate. The stafani is not fusible.", "logic": "\nArcane(stafani)\nforall x (Spanish(x) -> Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Spanish(x) and Peltate(x) -> Arcane(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) -> Fusible(x))\nforall x (Bunchy(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Spanish(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Fusible(x) -> Spanish(x))\nforall x (Spanish(x) and Arcane(x) -> Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Spanish(x) -> Peltate(x))\n\nnot Fusible(stafani)\n\nArcane(stafani) and forall x (Arcane(x) -> Fusible(x)) -> therefore Fusible(stafani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The carleen is favorable. If someone is transient then they are dissonant. If someone is transient and mindless then they are favorable. All favorable people are unvendible. Kind people are mindless. Young people are mindless. If someone is unvendible then they are transient. All transient, favorable people are dissonant. If someone is favorable and transient then they are mindless. The carleen is transient.", "logic": "\nFavorable(carleen)\nforall x (Transient(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) and Mindless(x) -> Favorable(x))\nforall x (Favorable(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Unvendible(x) -> Transient(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) and Favorable(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nforall x (Favorable(x) and Transient(x) -> Mindless(x))\n\nTransient(carleen)\n\nFavorable(carleen) and forall x (Favorable(x) -> Unvendible(x)) -> therefore Unvendible(carleen) Unvendible(carleen) and forall x (Unvendible(x) -> Transient(x)) -> therefore Transient(carleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The brigit is worthwhile. If someone is unrepaired then they are adjacent. If someone is unrepaired and thankful then they are worthwhile. All worthwhile people are paralytic. Kind people are thankful. Young people are thankful. If someone is paralytic then they are unrepaired. All unrepaired, worthwhile people are adjacent. If someone is worthwhile and unrepaired then they are thankful. The brigit is not unrepaired.", "logic": "\nWorthwhile(brigit)\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) -> Adjacent(x))\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) and Thankful(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Paralytic(x))\nforall x (Adjacent(x) -> Thankful(x))\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) -> Thankful(x))\nforall x (Paralytic(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) and Worthwhile(x) -> Adjacent(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) and Unrepaired(x) -> Thankful(x))\n\nnot Unrepaired(brigit)\n\nWorthwhile(brigit) and forall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Paralytic(x)) -> therefore Paralytic(brigit) Paralytic(brigit) and forall x (Paralytic(x) -> Unrepaired(x)) -> therefore Unrepaired(brigit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The kurtis is ovine. If someone is botswanan then they are nigerian. If someone is botswanan and girlish then they are ovine. All ovine people are absorbable. Kind people are girlish. Young people are girlish. If someone is absorbable then they are botswanan. All botswanan, ovine people are nigerian. If someone is ovine and botswanan then they are girlish. The kurtis is girlish.", "logic": "\nOvine(kurtis)\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Nigerian(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Girlish(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> Absorbable(x))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) -> Girlish(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Girlish(x))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Botswanan(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Ovine(x) -> Nigerian(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) and Botswanan(x) -> Girlish(x))\n\nGirlish(kurtis)\n\nOvine(kurtis) and forall x (Ovine(x) -> Absorbable(x)) -> therefore Absorbable(kurtis) Absorbable(kurtis) and forall x (Absorbable(x) -> Botswanan(x)) -> therefore Botswanan(kurtis) Botswanan(kurtis) and forall x (Botswanan(x) -> Girlish(x)) -> therefore Girlish(kurtis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The galina is viscid. If someone is wingless then they are dependant. If someone is wingless and sane then they are viscid. All viscid people are adiabatic. Kind people are sane. Young people are sane. If someone is adiabatic then they are wingless. All wingless, viscid people are dependant. If someone is viscid and wingless then they are sane. The galina is not dependant.", "logic": "\nViscid(galina)\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Dependant(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) and Sane(x) -> Viscid(x))\nforall x (Viscid(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) -> Sane(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Sane(x))\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) -> Wingless(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) and Viscid(x) -> Dependant(x))\nforall x (Viscid(x) and Wingless(x) -> Sane(x))\n\nnot Dependant(galina)\n\nViscid(galina) and forall x (Viscid(x) -> Adiabatic(x)) -> therefore Adiabatic(galina) Adiabatic(galina) and forall x (Adiabatic(x) -> Wingless(x)) -> therefore Wingless(galina) Wingless(galina) and forall x (Wingless(x) -> Dependant(x)) -> therefore Dependant(galina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The yalonda is moldovan. If someone is executive then they are cortical. If someone is executive and uvular then they are moldovan. All moldovan people are benign. Kind people are uvular. Young people are uvular. If someone is benign then they are executive. All executive, moldovan people are cortical. If someone is moldovan and executive then they are uvular. The yalonda does not see the yalonda.", "logic": "\nMoldovan(yalonda)\nforall x (Executive(x) -> Cortical(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) and Uvular(x) -> Moldovan(x))\nforall x (Moldovan(x) -> Benign(x))\nforall x (Cortical(x) -> Uvular(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) -> Uvular(x))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Executive(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) and Moldovan(x) -> Cortical(x))\nforall x (Moldovan(x) and Executive(x) -> Uvular(x))\n\nnot Sees(yalonda, yalonda)\n\nnot Sees(yalonda, yalonda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The shepperd is stubborn. If someone is tangy then they are meandering. If someone is tangy and mercenary then they are stubborn. All stubborn people are scarred. Kind people are mercenary. Young people are mercenary. If someone is scarred then they are tangy. All tangy, stubborn people are meandering. If someone is stubborn and tangy then they are mercenary. The shepperd likes the shepperd.", "logic": "\nStubborn(shepperd)\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Meandering(x))\nforall x (Tangy(x) and Mercenary(x) -> Stubborn(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Scarred(x))\nforall x (Meandering(x) -> Mercenary(x))\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Mercenary(x))\nforall x (Scarred(x) -> Tangy(x))\nforall x (Tangy(x) and Stubborn(x) -> Meandering(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) and Tangy(x) -> Mercenary(x))\n\nLikes(shepperd, shepperd)\n\nLikes(shepperd, shepperd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The arther roam the aharon. The arther is heterodox. The arther debar the aharon. The aharon roam the arther. The aharon is plumping. The aharon debar the arther. The aharon prostitute the arther. If the aharon prostitute the arther then the arther is heterodox. If something is biface then it is heterodox. If something debar the aharon then the aharon is biface. If something prostitute the aharon then it roam the aharon. If the arther roam the aharon then the aharon is plumping. If the aharon is heterodox and the aharon roam the arther then the aharon is incurable. The arther is heterodox.", "logic": "\nRoam(arther, aharon)\nHeterodox(arther)\nDebar(arther, aharon)\nRoam(aharon, arther)\nPlumping(aharon)\nDebar(aharon, arther)\nProstitute(aharon, arther)\nProstitute(aharon, arther) -> Heterodox(arther)\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Heterodox(x))\nforall x (Debar(x, aharon) -> Biface(aharon))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, aharon) -> Roam(x, aharon))\nRoam(arther, aharon) -> Plumping(aharon)\nHeterodox(aharon) and Roam(aharon, arther) -> Incurable(aharon)\n\nHeterodox(arther)\n\ntherefore Heterodox(arther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The naomi pose the myrilla. The naomi is sozzled. The naomi butter the myrilla. The myrilla pose the naomi. The myrilla is equivalent. The myrilla butter the naomi. The myrilla criticize the naomi. If the myrilla criticize the naomi then the naomi is sozzled. If something is viii then it is sozzled. If something butter the myrilla then the myrilla is viii. If something criticize the myrilla then it pose the myrilla. If the naomi pose the myrilla then the myrilla is equivalent. If the myrilla is sozzled and the myrilla pose the naomi then the myrilla is metallike. The naomi does not chase the myrilla.", "logic": "\nPose(naomi, myrilla)\nSozzled(naomi)\nButter(naomi, myrilla)\nPose(myrilla, naomi)\nEquivalent(myrilla)\nButter(myrilla, naomi)\nCriticize(myrilla, naomi)\nCriticize(myrilla, naomi) -> Sozzled(naomi)\nforall x (Viii(x) -> Sozzled(x))\nforall x (Butter(x, myrilla) -> Viii(myrilla))\nforall x (Criticize(x, myrilla) -> Pose(x, myrilla))\nPose(naomi, myrilla) -> Equivalent(myrilla)\nSozzled(myrilla) and Pose(myrilla, naomi) -> Metallike(myrilla)\n\nnot Pose(naomi, myrilla)\n\ntherefore Pose(naomi, myrilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The sidnee roil the candra. The sidnee is separable. The sidnee rick the candra. The candra roil the sidnee. The candra is punitory. The candra rick the sidnee. The candra hassle the sidnee. If the candra hassle the sidnee then the sidnee is separable. If something is unhurt then it is separable. If something rick the candra then the candra is unhurt. If something hassle the candra then it roil the candra. If the sidnee roil the candra then the candra is punitory. If the candra is separable and the candra roil the sidnee then the candra is engrossing. The candra is unhurt.", "logic": "\nRoil(sidnee, candra)\nSeparable(sidnee)\nRick(sidnee, candra)\nRoil(candra, sidnee)\nPunitory(candra)\nRick(candra, sidnee)\nHassle(candra, sidnee)\nHassle(candra, sidnee) -> Separable(sidnee)\nforall x (Unhurt(x) -> Separable(x))\nforall x (Rick(x, candra) -> Unhurt(candra))\nforall x (Hassle(x, candra) -> Roil(x, candra))\nRoil(sidnee, candra) -> Punitory(candra)\nSeparable(candra) and Roil(candra, sidnee) -> Engrossing(candra)\n\nUnhurt(candra)\n\nRick(sidnee, candra) and forall x (Rick(x, candra) -> Unhurt(candra)) -> therefore Unhurt(candra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The willetta rupture the godfree. The willetta is unsalted. The willetta reappear the godfree. The godfree rupture the willetta. The godfree is stark. The godfree reappear the willetta. The godfree deplore the willetta. If the godfree deplore the willetta then the willetta is unsalted. If something is forgivable then it is unsalted. If something reappear the godfree then the godfree is forgivable. If something deplore the godfree then it rupture the godfree. If the willetta rupture the godfree then the godfree is stark. If the godfree is unsalted and the godfree rupture the willetta then the godfree is kyphotic. The godfree is not forgivable.", "logic": "\nRupture(willetta, godfree)\nUnsalted(willetta)\nReappear(willetta, godfree)\nRupture(godfree, willetta)\nStark(godfree)\nReappear(godfree, willetta)\nDeplore(godfree, willetta)\nDeplore(godfree, willetta) -> Unsalted(willetta)\nforall x (Forgivable(x) -> Unsalted(x))\nforall x (Reappear(x, godfree) -> Forgivable(godfree))\nforall x (Deplore(x, godfree) -> Rupture(x, godfree))\nRupture(willetta, godfree) -> Stark(godfree)\nUnsalted(godfree) and Rupture(godfree, willetta) -> Kyphotic(godfree)\n\nnot Forgivable(godfree)\n\nReappear(willetta, godfree) and forall x (Reappear(x, godfree) -> Forgivable(godfree)) -> therefore Forgivable(godfree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The caspar harm the eyde. The caspar is preemptive. The caspar gestate the eyde. The eyde harm the caspar. The eyde is faltering. The eyde gestate the caspar. The eyde peep the caspar. If the eyde peep the caspar then the caspar is preemptive. If something is octagonal then it is preemptive. If something gestate the eyde then the eyde is octagonal. If something peep the eyde then it harm the eyde. If the caspar harm the eyde then the eyde is faltering. If the eyde is preemptive and the eyde harm the caspar then the eyde is wriggling. The eyde is preemptive.", "logic": "\nHarm(caspar, eyde)\nPreemptive(caspar)\nGestate(caspar, eyde)\nHarm(eyde, caspar)\nFaltering(eyde)\nGestate(eyde, caspar)\nPeep(eyde, caspar)\nPeep(eyde, caspar) -> Preemptive(caspar)\nforall x (Octagonal(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Gestate(x, eyde) -> Octagonal(eyde))\nforall x (Peep(x, eyde) -> Harm(x, eyde))\nHarm(caspar, eyde) -> Faltering(eyde)\nPreemptive(eyde) and Harm(eyde, caspar) -> Wriggling(eyde)\n\nPreemptive(eyde)\n\nGestate(caspar, eyde) and forall x (Gestate(x, eyde) -> Octagonal(eyde)) -> therefore Octagonal(eyde) Octagonal(eyde) and forall x (Octagonal(x) -> Preemptive(x)) -> therefore Preemptive(eyde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The willy behove the kristyn. The willy is vapourised. The willy sudate the kristyn. The kristyn behove the willy. The kristyn is arterial. The kristyn sudate the willy. The kristyn scab the willy. If the kristyn scab the willy then the willy is vapourised. If something is mature then it is vapourised. If something sudate the kristyn then the kristyn is mature. If something scab the kristyn then it behove the kristyn. If the willy behove the kristyn then the kristyn is arterial. If the kristyn is vapourised and the kristyn behove the willy then the kristyn is oleophilic. The kristyn is not vapourised.", "logic": "\nBehove(willy, kristyn)\nVapourised(willy)\nSudate(willy, kristyn)\nBehove(kristyn, willy)\nArterial(kristyn)\nSudate(kristyn, willy)\nScab(kristyn, willy)\nScab(kristyn, willy) -> Vapourised(willy)\nforall x (Mature(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Sudate(x, kristyn) -> Mature(kristyn))\nforall x (Scab(x, kristyn) -> Behove(x, kristyn))\nBehove(willy, kristyn) -> Arterial(kristyn)\nVapourised(kristyn) and Behove(kristyn, willy) -> Oleophilic(kristyn)\n\nnot Vapourised(kristyn)\n\nSudate(willy, kristyn) and forall x (Sudate(x, kristyn) -> Mature(kristyn)) -> therefore Mature(kristyn) Mature(kristyn) and forall x (Mature(x) -> Vapourised(x)) -> therefore Vapourised(kristyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The zeus exercise the adair. The zeus is larval. The zeus apprehend the adair. The adair exercise the zeus. The adair is prefaded. The adair apprehend the zeus. The adair outmode the zeus. If the adair outmode the zeus then the zeus is larval. If something is flyaway then it is larval. If something apprehend the adair then the adair is flyaway. If something outmode the adair then it exercise the adair. If the zeus exercise the adair then the adair is prefaded. If the adair is larval and the adair exercise the zeus then the adair is distinct. The adair is distinct.", "logic": "\nExercise(zeus, adair)\nLarval(zeus)\nApprehend(zeus, adair)\nExercise(adair, zeus)\nPrefaded(adair)\nApprehend(adair, zeus)\nOutmode(adair, zeus)\nOutmode(adair, zeus) -> Larval(zeus)\nforall x (Flyaway(x) -> Larval(x))\nforall x (Apprehend(x, adair) -> Flyaway(adair))\nforall x (Outmode(x, adair) -> Exercise(x, adair))\nExercise(zeus, adair) -> Prefaded(adair)\nLarval(adair) and Exercise(adair, zeus) -> Distinct(adair)\n\nDistinct(adair)\n\nApprehend(zeus, adair) and forall x (Apprehend(x, adair) -> Flyaway(adair)) -> therefore Flyaway(adair) Flyaway(adair) and forall x (Flyaway(x) -> Larval(x)) -> therefore Larval(adair) Larval(adair) and Exercise(adair, zeus) and Larval(adair) and Exercise(adair, zeus) -> Distinct(adair) -> therefore Distinct(adair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The jordy dimension the lyndy. The jordy is fluid. The jordy sough the lyndy. The lyndy dimension the jordy. The lyndy is panoptic. The lyndy sough the jordy. The lyndy massage the jordy. If the lyndy massage the jordy then the jordy is fluid. If something is cesarean then it is fluid. If something sough the lyndy then the lyndy is cesarean. If something massage the lyndy then it dimension the lyndy. If the jordy dimension the lyndy then the lyndy is panoptic. If the lyndy is fluid and the lyndy dimension the jordy then the lyndy is jammed. The lyndy is not jammed.", "logic": "\nDimension(jordy, lyndy)\nFluid(jordy)\nSough(jordy, lyndy)\nDimension(lyndy, jordy)\nPanoptic(lyndy)\nSough(lyndy, jordy)\nMassage(lyndy, jordy)\nMassage(lyndy, jordy) -> Fluid(jordy)\nforall x (Cesarean(x) -> Fluid(x))\nforall x (Sough(x, lyndy) -> Cesarean(lyndy))\nforall x (Massage(x, lyndy) -> Dimension(x, lyndy))\nDimension(jordy, lyndy) -> Panoptic(lyndy)\nFluid(lyndy) and Dimension(lyndy, jordy) -> Jammed(lyndy)\n\nnot Jammed(lyndy)\n\nSough(jordy, lyndy) and forall x (Sough(x, lyndy) -> Cesarean(lyndy)) -> therefore Cesarean(lyndy) Cesarean(lyndy) and forall x (Cesarean(x) -> Fluid(x)) -> therefore Fluid(lyndy) Fluid(lyndy) and Dimension(lyndy, jordy) and Fluid(lyndy) and Dimension(lyndy, jordy) -> Jammed(lyndy) -> therefore Jammed(lyndy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The marcela collogue the marilee. The marcela is allergic. The marcela filigree the marilee. The marilee collogue the marcela. The marilee is cyanophyte. The marilee filigree the marcela. The marilee impinge the marcela. If the marilee impinge the marcela then the marcela is allergic. If something is uppermost then it is allergic. If something filigree the marilee then the marilee is uppermost. If something impinge the marilee then it collogue the marilee. If the marcela collogue the marilee then the marilee is cyanophyte. If the marilee is allergic and the marilee collogue the marcela then the marilee is puerile. The marilee does not chase the marilee.", "logic": "\nCollogue(marcela, marilee)\nAllergic(marcela)\nFiligree(marcela, marilee)\nCollogue(marilee, marcela)\nCyanophyte(marilee)\nFiligree(marilee, marcela)\nImpinge(marilee, marcela)\nImpinge(marilee, marcela) -> Allergic(marcela)\nforall x (Uppermost(x) -> Allergic(x))\nforall x (Filigree(x, marilee) -> Uppermost(marilee))\nforall x (Impinge(x, marilee) -> Collogue(x, marilee))\nCollogue(marcela, marilee) -> Cyanophyte(marilee)\nAllergic(marilee) and Collogue(marilee, marcela) -> Puerile(marilee)\n\nnot Collogue(marilee, marilee)\n\nforall x (Impinge(x, marilee) -> Collogue(x, marilee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The paulette sample the sarita. The paulette is pectoral. The paulette blood the sarita. The sarita sample the paulette. The sarita is ravaged. The sarita blood the paulette. The sarita toot the paulette. If the sarita toot the paulette then the paulette is pectoral. If something is bestial then it is pectoral. If something blood the sarita then the sarita is bestial. If something toot the sarita then it sample the sarita. If the paulette sample the sarita then the sarita is ravaged. If the sarita is pectoral and the sarita sample the paulette then the sarita is sonant. The paulette toot the sarita.", "logic": "\nSample(paulette, sarita)\nPectoral(paulette)\nBlood(paulette, sarita)\nSample(sarita, paulette)\nRavaged(sarita)\nBlood(sarita, paulette)\nToot(sarita, paulette)\nToot(sarita, paulette) -> Pectoral(paulette)\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Pectoral(x))\nforall x (Blood(x, sarita) -> Bestial(sarita))\nforall x (Toot(x, sarita) -> Sample(x, sarita))\nSample(paulette, sarita) -> Ravaged(sarita)\nPectoral(sarita) and Sample(sarita, paulette) -> Sonant(sarita)\n\nToot(paulette, sarita)\n\nToot(paulette, sarita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The loraine aggregate the amalea. The loraine is aboral. The loraine undulate the amalea. The amalea aggregate the loraine. The amalea is populous. The amalea undulate the loraine. The amalea kick the loraine. If the amalea kick the loraine then the loraine is aboral. If something is soundable then it is aboral. If something undulate the amalea then the amalea is soundable. If something kick the amalea then it aggregate the amalea. If the loraine aggregate the amalea then the amalea is populous. If the amalea is aboral and the amalea aggregate the loraine then the amalea is tasteless. The loraine is not tasteless.", "logic": "\nAggregate(loraine, amalea)\nAboral(loraine)\nUndulate(loraine, amalea)\nAggregate(amalea, loraine)\nPopulous(amalea)\nUndulate(amalea, loraine)\nKick(amalea, loraine)\nKick(amalea, loraine) -> Aboral(loraine)\nforall x (Soundable(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Undulate(x, amalea) -> Soundable(amalea))\nforall x (Kick(x, amalea) -> Aggregate(x, amalea))\nAggregate(loraine, amalea) -> Populous(amalea)\nAboral(amalea) and Aggregate(amalea, loraine) -> Tasteless(amalea)\n\nnot Tasteless(loraine)\n\nnot Tasteless(loraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The sarah refracture the odessa. The sarah is activated. The sarah overdraw the odessa. The odessa refracture the sarah. The odessa is bearable. The odessa overdraw the sarah. The odessa enslave the sarah. If the odessa enslave the sarah then the sarah is activated. If something is hmong then it is activated. If something overdraw the odessa then the odessa is hmong. If something enslave the odessa then it refracture the odessa. If the sarah refracture the odessa then the odessa is bearable. If the odessa is activated and the odessa refracture the sarah then the odessa is famous. The sarah is hmong.", "logic": "\nRefracture(sarah, odessa)\nActivated(sarah)\nOverdraw(sarah, odessa)\nRefracture(odessa, sarah)\nBearable(odessa)\nOverdraw(odessa, sarah)\nEnslave(odessa, sarah)\nEnslave(odessa, sarah) -> Activated(sarah)\nforall x (Hmong(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Overdraw(x, odessa) -> Hmong(odessa))\nforall x (Enslave(x, odessa) -> Refracture(x, odessa))\nRefracture(sarah, odessa) -> Bearable(odessa)\nActivated(odessa) and Refracture(odessa, sarah) -> Famous(odessa)\n\nHmong(sarah)\n\nHmong(sarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The joellen hinder the nadeen. The joellen is encircling. The joellen check the nadeen. The nadeen hinder the joellen. The nadeen is forced. The nadeen check the joellen. The nadeen cobble the joellen. If the nadeen cobble the joellen then the joellen is encircling. If something is rackety then it is encircling. If something check the nadeen then the nadeen is rackety. If something cobble the nadeen then it hinder the nadeen. If the joellen hinder the nadeen then the nadeen is forced. If the nadeen is encircling and the nadeen hinder the joellen then the nadeen is cambial. The nadeen does not see the nadeen.", "logic": "\nHinder(joellen, nadeen)\nEncircling(joellen)\nCheck(joellen, nadeen)\nHinder(nadeen, joellen)\nForced(nadeen)\nCheck(nadeen, joellen)\nCobble(nadeen, joellen)\nCobble(nadeen, joellen) -> Encircling(joellen)\nforall x (Rackety(x) -> Encircling(x))\nforall x (Check(x, nadeen) -> Rackety(nadeen))\nforall x (Cobble(x, nadeen) -> Hinder(x, nadeen))\nHinder(joellen, nadeen) -> Forced(nadeen)\nEncircling(nadeen) and Hinder(nadeen, joellen) -> Cambial(nadeen)\n\nnot Cobble(nadeen, nadeen)\n\nnot Cobble(nadeen, nadeen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The edward pronounce the alma. The edward is untrained. The edward derail the alma. The alma pronounce the edward. The alma is changeable. The alma derail the edward. The alma disgruntle the edward. If the alma disgruntle the edward then the edward is untrained. If something is coolheaded then it is untrained. If something derail the alma then the alma is coolheaded. If something disgruntle the alma then it pronounce the alma. If the edward pronounce the alma then the alma is changeable. If the alma is untrained and the alma pronounce the edward then the alma is aired. The alma is cold.", "logic": "\nPronounce(edward, alma)\nUntrained(edward)\nDerail(edward, alma)\nPronounce(alma, edward)\nChangeable(alma)\nDerail(alma, edward)\nDisgruntle(alma, edward)\nDisgruntle(alma, edward) -> Untrained(edward)\nforall x (Coolheaded(x) -> Untrained(x))\nforall x (Derail(x, alma) -> Coolheaded(alma))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, alma) -> Pronounce(x, alma))\nPronounce(edward, alma) -> Changeable(alma)\nUntrained(alma) and Pronounce(alma, edward) -> Aired(alma)\n\nCold(alma)\n\nCold(alma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The ranique deplumate the havivah. The ranique is wraithlike. The ranique thicken the havivah. The havivah deplumate the ranique. The havivah is chintzy. The havivah thicken the ranique. The havivah repot the ranique. If the havivah repot the ranique then the ranique is wraithlike. If something is dowered then it is wraithlike. If something thicken the havivah then the havivah is dowered. If something repot the havivah then it deplumate the havivah. If the ranique deplumate the havivah then the havivah is chintzy. If the havivah is wraithlike and the havivah deplumate the ranique then the havivah is hurrying. The ranique is not chintzy.", "logic": "\nDeplumate(ranique, havivah)\nWraithlike(ranique)\nThicken(ranique, havivah)\nDeplumate(havivah, ranique)\nChintzy(havivah)\nThicken(havivah, ranique)\nRepot(havivah, ranique)\nRepot(havivah, ranique) -> Wraithlike(ranique)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\nforall x (Thicken(x, havivah) -> Dowered(havivah))\nforall x (Repot(x, havivah) -> Deplumate(x, havivah))\nDeplumate(ranique, havivah) -> Chintzy(havivah)\nWraithlike(havivah) and Deplumate(havivah, ranique) -> Hurrying(havivah)\n\nnot Chintzy(ranique)\n\nnot Chintzy(ranique) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The layne palaver the tremayne. The layne is euclidian. The layne stock the tremayne. The tremayne palaver the layne. The tremayne is puranic. The tremayne stock the layne. The tremayne specify the layne. If the tremayne specify the layne then the layne is euclidian. If something is nutty then it is euclidian. If something stock the tremayne then the tremayne is nutty. If something specify the tremayne then it palaver the tremayne. If the layne palaver the tremayne then the tremayne is puranic. If the tremayne is euclidian and the tremayne palaver the layne then the tremayne is juridic. The tremayne stock the tremayne.", "logic": "\nPalaver(layne, tremayne)\nEuclidian(layne)\nStock(layne, tremayne)\nPalaver(tremayne, layne)\nPuranic(tremayne)\nStock(tremayne, layne)\nSpecify(tremayne, layne)\nSpecify(tremayne, layne) -> Euclidian(layne)\nforall x (Nutty(x) -> Euclidian(x))\nforall x (Stock(x, tremayne) -> Nutty(tremayne))\nforall x (Specify(x, tremayne) -> Palaver(x, tremayne))\nPalaver(layne, tremayne) -> Puranic(tremayne)\nEuclidian(tremayne) and Palaver(tremayne, layne) -> Juridic(tremayne)\n\nStock(tremayne, tremayne)\n\nStock(tremayne, tremayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The hamish is hedged. The hamish is dissenting. The hamish shark the terrianne. The hamish flee the mohammed. The mohammed is evocative. The mohammed overfill the hamish. The mohammed shark the hamish. The mohammed shark the terrianne. The mohammed flee the hamish. The mohammed flee the terrianne. The terrianne is evocative. The terrianne overfill the mohammed. If something is dissenting then it overfill the terrianne. If something overfill the terrianne then it flee the terrianne. If something flee the terrianne then it flee the hamish. The terrianne overfill the mohammed.", "logic": "\nHedged(hamish)\nDissenting(hamish)\nShark(hamish, terrianne)\nFlee(hamish, mohammed)\nEvocative(mohammed)\nOverfill(mohammed, hamish)\nShark(mohammed, hamish)\nShark(mohammed, terrianne)\nFlee(mohammed, hamish)\nFlee(mohammed, terrianne)\nEvocative(terrianne)\nOverfill(terrianne, mohammed)\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Overfill(x, terrianne))\nforall x (Overfill(x, terrianne) -> Flee(x, terrianne))\nforall x (Flee(x, terrianne) -> Flee(x, hamish))\n\nOverfill(terrianne, mohammed)\n\ntherefore Overfill(terrianne, mohammed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The clotilda is unvendible. The clotilda is offhand. The clotilda scranch the dinny. The clotilda temper the jody. The jody is brainsick. The jody experiment the clotilda. The jody scranch the clotilda. The jody scranch the dinny. The jody temper the clotilda. The jody temper the dinny. The dinny is brainsick. The dinny experiment the jody. If something is offhand then it experiment the dinny. If something experiment the dinny then it temper the dinny. If something temper the dinny then it temper the clotilda. The dinny does not like the jody.", "logic": "\nUnvendible(clotilda)\nOffhand(clotilda)\nScranch(clotilda, dinny)\nTemper(clotilda, jody)\nBrainsick(jody)\nExperiment(jody, clotilda)\nScranch(jody, clotilda)\nScranch(jody, dinny)\nTemper(jody, clotilda)\nTemper(jody, dinny)\nBrainsick(dinny)\nExperiment(dinny, jody)\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Experiment(x, dinny))\nforall x (Experiment(x, dinny) -> Temper(x, dinny))\nforall x (Temper(x, dinny) -> Temper(x, clotilda))\n\nnot Experiment(dinny, jody)\n\ntherefore Experiment(dinny, jody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The corette is boastful. The corette is justified. The corette bilge the cammy. The corette snowboard the dorcas. The dorcas is outfitted. The dorcas reside the corette. The dorcas bilge the corette. The dorcas bilge the cammy. The dorcas snowboard the corette. The dorcas snowboard the cammy. The cammy is outfitted. The cammy reside the dorcas. If something is justified then it reside the cammy. If something reside the cammy then it snowboard the cammy. If something snowboard the cammy then it snowboard the corette. The corette reside the cammy.", "logic": "\nBoastful(corette)\nJustified(corette)\nBilge(corette, cammy)\nSnowboard(corette, dorcas)\nOutfitted(dorcas)\nReside(dorcas, corette)\nBilge(dorcas, corette)\nBilge(dorcas, cammy)\nSnowboard(dorcas, corette)\nSnowboard(dorcas, cammy)\nOutfitted(cammy)\nReside(cammy, dorcas)\nforall x (Justified(x) -> Reside(x, cammy))\nforall x (Reside(x, cammy) -> Snowboard(x, cammy))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, cammy) -> Snowboard(x, corette))\n\nReside(corette, cammy)\n\nJustified(corette) and forall x (Justified(x) -> Reside(x, cammy)) -> therefore Reside(corette, cammy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The kareem is benumbed. The kareem is salutary. The kareem abjure the bartlet. The kareem yowl the willyt. The willyt is agraphic. The willyt introduce the kareem. The willyt abjure the kareem. The willyt abjure the bartlet. The willyt yowl the kareem. The willyt yowl the bartlet. The bartlet is agraphic. The bartlet introduce the willyt. If something is salutary then it introduce the bartlet. If something introduce the bartlet then it yowl the bartlet. If something yowl the bartlet then it yowl the kareem. The kareem does not like the bartlet.", "logic": "\nBenumbed(kareem)\nSalutary(kareem)\nAbjure(kareem, bartlet)\nYowl(kareem, willyt)\nAgraphic(willyt)\nIntroduce(willyt, kareem)\nAbjure(willyt, kareem)\nAbjure(willyt, bartlet)\nYowl(willyt, kareem)\nYowl(willyt, bartlet)\nAgraphic(bartlet)\nIntroduce(bartlet, willyt)\nforall x (Salutary(x) -> Introduce(x, bartlet))\nforall x (Introduce(x, bartlet) -> Yowl(x, bartlet))\nforall x (Yowl(x, bartlet) -> Yowl(x, kareem))\n\nnot Introduce(kareem, bartlet)\n\nSalutary(kareem) and forall x (Salutary(x) -> Introduce(x, bartlet)) -> therefore Introduce(kareem, bartlet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The teodora is undulatory. The teodora is lienal. The teodora warble the merv. The teodora ford the rock. The rock is deviate. The rock lionise the teodora. The rock warble the teodora. The rock warble the merv. The rock ford the teodora. The rock ford the merv. The merv is deviate. The merv lionise the rock. If something is lienal then it lionise the merv. If something lionise the merv then it ford the merv. If something ford the merv then it ford the teodora. The teodora ford the merv.", "logic": "\nUndulatory(teodora)\nLienal(teodora)\nWarble(teodora, merv)\nFord(teodora, rock)\nDeviate(rock)\nLionise(rock, teodora)\nWarble(rock, teodora)\nWarble(rock, merv)\nFord(rock, teodora)\nFord(rock, merv)\nDeviate(merv)\nLionise(merv, rock)\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> Lionise(x, merv))\nforall x (Lionise(x, merv) -> Ford(x, merv))\nforall x (Ford(x, merv) -> Ford(x, teodora))\n\nFord(teodora, merv)\n\nLienal(teodora) and forall x (Lienal(x) -> Lionise(x, merv)) -> therefore Lionise(teodora, merv) Lionise(teodora, merv) and forall x (Lionise(x, merv) -> Ford(x, merv)) -> therefore Ford(teodora, merv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The gustav is referenced. The gustav is animate. The gustav abuse the marsh. The gustav save the carleigh. The carleigh is thermionic. The carleigh pounce the gustav. The carleigh abuse the gustav. The carleigh abuse the marsh. The carleigh save the gustav. The carleigh save the marsh. The marsh is thermionic. The marsh pounce the carleigh. If something is animate then it pounce the marsh. If something pounce the marsh then it save the marsh. If something save the marsh then it save the gustav. The gustav does not visit the marsh.", "logic": "\nReferenced(gustav)\nAnimate(gustav)\nAbuse(gustav, marsh)\nSave(gustav, carleigh)\nThermionic(carleigh)\nPounce(carleigh, gustav)\nAbuse(carleigh, gustav)\nAbuse(carleigh, marsh)\nSave(carleigh, gustav)\nSave(carleigh, marsh)\nThermionic(marsh)\nPounce(marsh, carleigh)\nforall x (Animate(x) -> Pounce(x, marsh))\nforall x (Pounce(x, marsh) -> Save(x, marsh))\nforall x (Save(x, marsh) -> Save(x, gustav))\n\nnot Save(gustav, marsh)\n\nAnimate(gustav) and forall x (Animate(x) -> Pounce(x, marsh)) -> therefore Pounce(gustav, marsh) Pounce(gustav, marsh) and forall x (Pounce(x, marsh) -> Save(x, marsh)) -> therefore Save(gustav, marsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The kristan is prudish. The kristan is estranging. The kristan prod the lenette. The kristan beard the casper. The casper is fatalistic. The casper spondaize the kristan. The casper prod the kristan. The casper prod the lenette. The casper beard the kristan. The casper beard the lenette. The lenette is fatalistic. The lenette spondaize the casper. If something is estranging then it spondaize the lenette. If something spondaize the lenette then it beard the lenette. If something beard the lenette then it beard the kristan. The kristan beard the kristan.", "logic": "\nPrudish(kristan)\nEstranging(kristan)\nProd(kristan, lenette)\nBeard(kristan, casper)\nFatalistic(casper)\nSpondaize(casper, kristan)\nProd(casper, kristan)\nProd(casper, lenette)\nBeard(casper, kristan)\nBeard(casper, lenette)\nFatalistic(lenette)\nSpondaize(lenette, casper)\nforall x (Estranging(x) -> Spondaize(x, lenette))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, lenette) -> Beard(x, lenette))\nforall x (Beard(x, lenette) -> Beard(x, kristan))\n\nBeard(kristan, kristan)\n\nEstranging(kristan) and forall x (Estranging(x) -> Spondaize(x, lenette)) -> therefore Spondaize(kristan, lenette) Spondaize(kristan, lenette) and forall x (Spondaize(x, lenette) -> Beard(x, lenette)) -> therefore Beard(kristan, lenette) Beard(kristan, lenette) and forall x (Beard(x, lenette) -> Beard(x, kristan)) -> therefore Beard(kristan, kristan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The delila is nightly. The delila is alluring. The delila vaccinate the oswald. The delila honk the kissie. The kissie is collegiate. The kissie asphalt the delila. The kissie vaccinate the delila. The kissie vaccinate the oswald. The kissie honk the delila. The kissie honk the oswald. The oswald is collegiate. The oswald asphalt the kissie. If something is alluring then it asphalt the oswald. If something asphalt the oswald then it honk the oswald. If something honk the oswald then it honk the delila. The delila does not visit the delila.", "logic": "\nNightly(delila)\nAlluring(delila)\nVaccinate(delila, oswald)\nHonk(delila, kissie)\nCollegiate(kissie)\nAsphalt(kissie, delila)\nVaccinate(kissie, delila)\nVaccinate(kissie, oswald)\nHonk(kissie, delila)\nHonk(kissie, oswald)\nCollegiate(oswald)\nAsphalt(oswald, kissie)\nforall x (Alluring(x) -> Asphalt(x, oswald))\nforall x (Asphalt(x, oswald) -> Honk(x, oswald))\nforall x (Honk(x, oswald) -> Honk(x, delila))\n\nnot Honk(delila, delila)\n\nAlluring(delila) and forall x (Alluring(x) -> Asphalt(x, oswald)) -> therefore Asphalt(delila, oswald) Asphalt(delila, oswald) and forall x (Asphalt(x, oswald) -> Honk(x, oswald)) -> therefore Honk(delila, oswald) Honk(delila, oswald) and forall x (Honk(x, oswald) -> Honk(x, delila)) -> therefore Honk(delila, delila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The leone is arable. The leone is pulmonic. The leone wisecrack the noelle. The leone recruit the kiah. The kiah is dusky. The kiah brad the leone. The kiah wisecrack the leone. The kiah wisecrack the noelle. The kiah recruit the leone. The kiah recruit the noelle. The noelle is dusky. The noelle brad the kiah. If something is pulmonic then it brad the noelle. If something brad the noelle then it recruit the noelle. If something recruit the noelle then it recruit the leone. The noelle does not visit the noelle.", "logic": "\nArable(leone)\nPulmonic(leone)\nWisecrack(leone, noelle)\nRecruit(leone, kiah)\nDusky(kiah)\nBrad(kiah, leone)\nWisecrack(kiah, leone)\nWisecrack(kiah, noelle)\nRecruit(kiah, leone)\nRecruit(kiah, noelle)\nDusky(noelle)\nBrad(noelle, kiah)\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) -> Brad(x, noelle))\nforall x (Brad(x, noelle) -> Recruit(x, noelle))\nforall x (Recruit(x, noelle) -> Recruit(x, leone))\n\nnot Recruit(noelle, noelle)\n\nforall x (Brad(x, noelle) -> Recruit(x, noelle)) <- forall x (Pulmonic(x) -> Brad(x, noelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The devora is aggressive. The devora is apical. The devora patronize the tate. The devora jive the geralda. The geralda is backhanded. The geralda unstrain the devora. The geralda patronize the devora. The geralda patronize the tate. The geralda jive the devora. The geralda jive the tate. The tate is backhanded. The tate unstrain the geralda. If something is apical then it unstrain the tate. If something unstrain the tate then it jive the tate. If something jive the tate then it jive the devora. The tate unstrain the tate.", "logic": "\nAggressive(devora)\nApical(devora)\nPatronize(devora, tate)\nJive(devora, geralda)\nBackhanded(geralda)\nUnstrain(geralda, devora)\nPatronize(geralda, devora)\nPatronize(geralda, tate)\nJive(geralda, devora)\nJive(geralda, tate)\nBackhanded(tate)\nUnstrain(tate, geralda)\nforall x (Apical(x) -> Unstrain(x, tate))\nforall x (Unstrain(x, tate) -> Jive(x, tate))\nforall x (Jive(x, tate) -> Jive(x, devora))\n\nUnstrain(tate, tate)\n\nforall x (Apical(x) -> Unstrain(x, tate)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The madge is comburant. The madge is apophatic. The madge relapse the meghan. The madge savor the ardra. The ardra is drowsing. The ardra claw the madge. The ardra relapse the madge. The ardra relapse the meghan. The ardra savor the madge. The ardra savor the meghan. The meghan is drowsing. The meghan claw the ardra. If something is apophatic then it claw the meghan. If something claw the meghan then it savor the meghan. If something savor the meghan then it savor the madge. The ardra does not like the meghan.", "logic": "\nComburant(madge)\nApophatic(madge)\nRelapse(madge, meghan)\nSavor(madge, ardra)\nDrowsing(ardra)\nClaw(ardra, madge)\nRelapse(ardra, madge)\nRelapse(ardra, meghan)\nSavor(ardra, madge)\nSavor(ardra, meghan)\nDrowsing(meghan)\nClaw(meghan, ardra)\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Claw(x, meghan))\nforall x (Claw(x, meghan) -> Savor(x, meghan))\nforall x (Savor(x, meghan) -> Savor(x, madge))\n\nnot Claw(ardra, meghan)\n\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Claw(x, meghan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The nadean is daredevil. The nadean is stationary. The nadean jilt the seana. The nadean provision the fancy. The fancy is hesitant. The fancy bullyrag the nadean. The fancy jilt the nadean. The fancy jilt the seana. The fancy provision the nadean. The fancy provision the seana. The seana is hesitant. The seana bullyrag the fancy. If something is stationary then it bullyrag the seana. If something bullyrag the seana then it provision the seana. If something provision the seana then it provision the nadean. The seana provision the nadean.", "logic": "\nDaredevil(nadean)\nStationary(nadean)\nJilt(nadean, seana)\nProvision(nadean, fancy)\nHesitant(fancy)\nBullyrag(fancy, nadean)\nJilt(fancy, nadean)\nJilt(fancy, seana)\nProvision(fancy, nadean)\nProvision(fancy, seana)\nHesitant(seana)\nBullyrag(seana, fancy)\nforall x (Stationary(x) -> Bullyrag(x, seana))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, seana) -> Provision(x, seana))\nforall x (Provision(x, seana) -> Provision(x, nadean))\n\nProvision(seana, nadean)\n\nforall x (Provision(x, seana) -> Provision(x, nadean)) <- forall x (Bullyrag(x, seana) -> Provision(x, seana)) <- forall x (Stationary(x) -> Bullyrag(x, seana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The romeo is scrabbly. The romeo is crippled. The romeo indwell the carleen. The romeo prevent the jed. The jed is debonaire. The jed outrank the romeo. The jed indwell the romeo. The jed indwell the carleen. The jed prevent the romeo. The jed prevent the carleen. The carleen is debonaire. The carleen outrank the jed. If something is crippled then it outrank the carleen. If something outrank the carleen then it prevent the carleen. If something prevent the carleen then it prevent the romeo. The romeo is not debonaire.", "logic": "\nScrabbly(romeo)\nCrippled(romeo)\nIndwell(romeo, carleen)\nPrevent(romeo, jed)\nDebonaire(jed)\nOutrank(jed, romeo)\nIndwell(jed, romeo)\nIndwell(jed, carleen)\nPrevent(jed, romeo)\nPrevent(jed, carleen)\nDebonaire(carleen)\nOutrank(carleen, jed)\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Outrank(x, carleen))\nforall x (Outrank(x, carleen) -> Prevent(x, carleen))\nforall x (Prevent(x, carleen) -> Prevent(x, romeo))\n\nnot Debonaire(romeo)\n\nnot Debonaire(romeo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The edmond is analyzed. The edmond is myocardial. The edmond delay the kissiah. The edmond aestivate the olaf. The olaf is discreet. The olaf constrict the edmond. The olaf delay the edmond. The olaf delay the kissiah. The olaf aestivate the edmond. The olaf aestivate the kissiah. The kissiah is discreet. The kissiah constrict the olaf. If something is myocardial then it constrict the kissiah. If something constrict the kissiah then it aestivate the kissiah. If something aestivate the kissiah then it aestivate the edmond. The kissiah is myocardial.", "logic": "\nAnalyzed(edmond)\nMyocardial(edmond)\nDelay(edmond, kissiah)\nAestivate(edmond, olaf)\nDiscreet(olaf)\nConstrict(olaf, edmond)\nDelay(olaf, edmond)\nDelay(olaf, kissiah)\nAestivate(olaf, edmond)\nAestivate(olaf, kissiah)\nDiscreet(kissiah)\nConstrict(kissiah, olaf)\nforall x (Myocardial(x) -> Constrict(x, kissiah))\nforall x (Constrict(x, kissiah) -> Aestivate(x, kissiah))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, kissiah) -> Aestivate(x, edmond))\n\nMyocardial(kissiah)\n\nMyocardial(kissiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The jordana is available. The jordana is enceinte. The jordana decertify the maggie. The jordana pierce the andrew. The andrew is hearsay. The andrew unbalance the jordana. The andrew decertify the jordana. The andrew decertify the maggie. The andrew pierce the jordana. The andrew pierce the maggie. The maggie is hearsay. The maggie unbalance the andrew. If something is enceinte then it unbalance the maggie. If something unbalance the maggie then it pierce the maggie. If something pierce the maggie then it pierce the jordana. The jordana does not like the andrew.", "logic": "\nAvailable(jordana)\nEnceinte(jordana)\nDecertify(jordana, maggie)\nPierce(jordana, andrew)\nHearsay(andrew)\nUnbalance(andrew, jordana)\nDecertify(andrew, jordana)\nDecertify(andrew, maggie)\nPierce(andrew, jordana)\nPierce(andrew, maggie)\nHearsay(maggie)\nUnbalance(maggie, andrew)\nforall x (Enceinte(x) -> Unbalance(x, maggie))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, maggie) -> Pierce(x, maggie))\nforall x (Pierce(x, maggie) -> Pierce(x, jordana))\n\nnot Unbalance(jordana, andrew)\n\nnot Unbalance(jordana, andrew) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The karrah is forgivable. The karrah is akimbo. The karrah discase the demetris. The karrah purse the rafaela. The rafaela is communal. The rafaela bore the karrah. The rafaela discase the karrah. The rafaela discase the demetris. The rafaela purse the karrah. The rafaela purse the demetris. The demetris is communal. The demetris bore the rafaela. If something is akimbo then it bore the demetris. If something bore the demetris then it purse the demetris. If something purse the demetris then it purse the karrah. The karrah bore the karrah.", "logic": "\nForgivable(karrah)\nAkimbo(karrah)\nDiscase(karrah, demetris)\nPurse(karrah, rafaela)\nCommunal(rafaela)\nBore(rafaela, karrah)\nDiscase(rafaela, karrah)\nDiscase(rafaela, demetris)\nPurse(rafaela, karrah)\nPurse(rafaela, demetris)\nCommunal(demetris)\nBore(demetris, rafaela)\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Bore(x, demetris))\nforall x (Bore(x, demetris) -> Purse(x, demetris))\nforall x (Purse(x, demetris) -> Purse(x, karrah))\n\nBore(karrah, karrah)\n\nBore(karrah, karrah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "Renaldo is polytonal. Cynthia is spellbound. Mortie is fell. Mariel is labile. All only people are nurtural. If someone is spellbound then they are nurtural. If someone is engraved then they are labile. If someone is labile then they are nurtural. All spellbound people are only. All polytonal people are spellbound. If Cynthia is only and Cynthia is nurtural then Cynthia is polytonal. All only people are fell. Cynthia is spellbound.", "logic": "\nPolytonal(renaldo)\nSpellbound(cynthia)\nFell(mortie)\nLabile(mariel)\nforall x (Only(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Spellbound(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Labile(x))\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Spellbound(x) -> Only(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Spellbound(x))\nOnly(cynthia) and Nurtural(cynthia) -> Polytonal(cynthia)\nforall x (Only(x) -> Fell(x))\n\nSpellbound(cynthia)\n\ntherefore Spellbound(cynthia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Gwyneth is ugandan. Joleen is exaugural. Manya is billion. Charmine is zesty. All acidulent people are splenic. If someone is exaugural then they are splenic. If someone is trusting then they are zesty. If someone is zesty then they are splenic. All exaugural people are acidulent. All ugandan people are exaugural. If Joleen is acidulent and Joleen is splenic then Joleen is ugandan. All acidulent people are billion. Gwyneth is not ugandan.", "logic": "\nUgandan(gwyneth)\nExaugural(joleen)\nBillion(manya)\nZesty(charmine)\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Splenic(x))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) -> Splenic(x))\nforall x (Trusting(x) -> Zesty(x))\nforall x (Zesty(x) -> Splenic(x))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) -> Exaugural(x))\nAcidulent(joleen) and Splenic(joleen) -> Ugandan(joleen)\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Billion(x))\n\nnot Ugandan(gwyneth)\n\ntherefore Ugandan(gwyneth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Mitchel is pussy. Joe is uncharged. Taffy is minty. Valentia is expressed. All moderato people are subacid. If someone is uncharged then they are subacid. If someone is ctenoid then they are expressed. If someone is expressed then they are subacid. All uncharged people are moderato. All pussy people are uncharged. If Joe is moderato and Joe is subacid then Joe is pussy. All moderato people are minty. Valentia is subacid.", "logic": "\nPussy(mitchel)\nUncharged(joe)\nMinty(taffy)\nExpressed(valentia)\nforall x (Moderato(x) -> Subacid(x))\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Subacid(x))\nforall x (Ctenoid(x) -> Expressed(x))\nforall x (Expressed(x) -> Subacid(x))\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Moderato(x))\nforall x (Pussy(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nModerato(joe) and Subacid(joe) -> Pussy(joe)\nforall x (Moderato(x) -> Minty(x))\n\nSubacid(valentia)\n\nExpressed(valentia) and forall x (Expressed(x) -> Subacid(x)) -> therefore Subacid(valentia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Ram is columnar. Jania is paroxysmal. Elysia is unrelaxed. Ethelyn is cruel. All durable people are unguarded. If someone is paroxysmal then they are unguarded. If someone is abomasal then they are cruel. If someone is cruel then they are unguarded. All paroxysmal people are durable. All columnar people are paroxysmal. If Jania is durable and Jania is unguarded then Jania is columnar. All durable people are unrelaxed. Jania is not durable.", "logic": "\nColumnar(ram)\nParoxysmal(jania)\nUnrelaxed(elysia)\nCruel(ethelyn)\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Cruel(x))\nforall x (Cruel(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) -> Durable(x))\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Paroxysmal(x))\nDurable(jania) and Unguarded(jania) -> Columnar(jania)\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\n\nnot Durable(jania)\n\nParoxysmal(jania) and forall x (Paroxysmal(x) -> Durable(x)) -> therefore Durable(jania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Theda is unchanged. Maryl is gangling. Elmore is unrelieved. Conroy is acceptant. All antithetic people are untreated. If someone is gangling then they are untreated. If someone is adsorbent then they are acceptant. If someone is acceptant then they are untreated. All gangling people are antithetic. All unchanged people are gangling. If Maryl is antithetic and Maryl is untreated then Maryl is unchanged. All antithetic people are unrelieved. Theda is untreated.", "logic": "\nUnchanged(theda)\nGangling(maryl)\nUnrelieved(elmore)\nAcceptant(conroy)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Gangling(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Acceptant(x))\nforall x (Acceptant(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Gangling(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) -> Gangling(x))\nAntithetic(maryl) and Untreated(maryl) -> Unchanged(maryl)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\n\nUntreated(theda)\n\nUnchanged(theda) and forall x (Unchanged(x) -> Gangling(x)) -> therefore Gangling(theda) Gangling(theda) and forall x (Gangling(x) -> Untreated(x)) -> therefore Untreated(theda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Zolly is seamed. Denni is realistic. Gerome is invertible. Yvonne is syncarpous. All nappy people are organised. If someone is realistic then they are organised. If someone is kindled then they are syncarpous. If someone is syncarpous then they are organised. All realistic people are nappy. All seamed people are realistic. If Denni is nappy and Denni is organised then Denni is seamed. All nappy people are invertible. Zolly is not nappy.", "logic": "\nSeamed(zolly)\nRealistic(denni)\nInvertible(gerome)\nSyncarpous(yvonne)\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) -> Nappy(x))\nforall x (Seamed(x) -> Realistic(x))\nNappy(denni) and Organised(denni) -> Seamed(denni)\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Invertible(x))\n\nnot Nappy(zolly)\n\nSeamed(zolly) and forall x (Seamed(x) -> Realistic(x)) -> therefore Realistic(zolly) Realistic(zolly) and forall x (Realistic(x) -> Nappy(x)) -> therefore Nappy(zolly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Bathsheba is pancreatic. Gustav is anoestrous. Louisa is trustful. Penelope is pleasing. All decurved people are turkish. If someone is anoestrous then they are turkish. If someone is lawless then they are pleasing. If someone is pleasing then they are turkish. All anoestrous people are decurved. All pancreatic people are anoestrous. If Gustav is decurved and Gustav is turkish then Gustav is pancreatic. All decurved people are trustful. Bathsheba is trustful.", "logic": "\nPancreatic(bathsheba)\nAnoestrous(gustav)\nTrustful(louisa)\nPleasing(penelope)\nforall x (Decurved(x) -> Turkish(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Turkish(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Turkish(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Anoestrous(x))\nDecurved(gustav) and Turkish(gustav) -> Pancreatic(gustav)\nforall x (Decurved(x) -> Trustful(x))\n\nTrustful(bathsheba)\n\nPancreatic(bathsheba) and forall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Anoestrous(x)) -> therefore Anoestrous(bathsheba) Anoestrous(bathsheba) and forall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Decurved(x)) -> therefore Decurved(bathsheba) Decurved(bathsheba) and forall x (Decurved(x) -> Trustful(x)) -> therefore Trustful(bathsheba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Berkie is overhasty. Pearla is primary. Lorianna is inarguable. Sebastian is wimpy. All plumose people are brusk. If someone is primary then they are brusk. If someone is soiled then they are wimpy. If someone is wimpy then they are brusk. All primary people are plumose. All overhasty people are primary. If Pearla is plumose and Pearla is brusk then Pearla is overhasty. All plumose people are inarguable. Berkie is not inarguable.", "logic": "\nOverhasty(berkie)\nPrimary(pearla)\nInarguable(lorianna)\nWimpy(sebastian)\nforall x (Plumose(x) -> Brusk(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Brusk(x))\nforall x (Soiled(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) -> Brusk(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Plumose(x))\nforall x (Overhasty(x) -> Primary(x))\nPlumose(pearla) and Brusk(pearla) -> Overhasty(pearla)\nforall x (Plumose(x) -> Inarguable(x))\n\nnot Inarguable(berkie)\n\nOverhasty(berkie) and forall x (Overhasty(x) -> Primary(x)) -> therefore Primary(berkie) Primary(berkie) and forall x (Primary(x) -> Plumose(x)) -> therefore Plumose(berkie) Plumose(berkie) and forall x (Plumose(x) -> Inarguable(x)) -> therefore Inarguable(berkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Colline is descendent. Harv is sonorous. Agnesse is giant. Rosemary is agrypnotic. All specific people are delayed. If someone is sonorous then they are delayed. If someone is bardic then they are agrypnotic. If someone is agrypnotic then they are delayed. All sonorous people are specific. All descendent people are sonorous. If Harv is specific and Harv is delayed then Harv is descendent. All specific people are giant. Agnesse is not sonorous.", "logic": "\nDescendent(colline)\nSonorous(harv)\nGiant(agnesse)\nAgrypnotic(rosemary)\nforall x (Specific(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Sonorous(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) -> Agrypnotic(x))\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Sonorous(x) -> Specific(x))\nforall x (Descendent(x) -> Sonorous(x))\nSpecific(harv) and Delayed(harv) -> Descendent(harv)\nforall x (Specific(x) -> Giant(x))\n\nnot Sonorous(agnesse)\n\nforall x (Descendent(x) -> Sonorous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Cristy is calando. Marieann is colorful. Madella is fiendish. Elnora is unfixed. All ameban people are untrod. If someone is colorful then they are untrod. If someone is banned then they are unfixed. If someone is unfixed then they are untrod. All colorful people are ameban. All calando people are colorful. If Marieann is ameban and Marieann is untrod then Marieann is calando. All ameban people are fiendish. Madella is unfixed.", "logic": "\nCalando(cristy)\nColorful(marieann)\nFiendish(madella)\nUnfixed(elnora)\nforall x (Ameban(x) -> Untrod(x))\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Untrod(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Unfixed(x) -> Untrod(x))\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Ameban(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Colorful(x))\nAmeban(marieann) and Untrod(marieann) -> Calando(marieann)\nforall x (Ameban(x) -> Fiendish(x))\n\nUnfixed(madella)\n\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Unfixed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Madeleine is overnight. Adair is existent. Vale is romansh. Vanny is napping. All ceremonial people are indigent. If someone is existent then they are indigent. If someone is alcoholic then they are napping. If someone is napping then they are indigent. All existent people are ceremonial. All overnight people are existent. If Adair is ceremonial and Adair is indigent then Adair is overnight. All ceremonial people are romansh. Vanny is not romansh.", "logic": "\nOvernight(madeleine)\nExistent(adair)\nRomansh(vale)\nNapping(vanny)\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Indigent(x))\nforall x (Existent(x) -> Indigent(x))\nforall x (Alcoholic(x) -> Napping(x))\nforall x (Napping(x) -> Indigent(x))\nforall x (Existent(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Overnight(x) -> Existent(x))\nCeremonial(adair) and Indigent(adair) -> Overnight(adair)\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Romansh(x))\n\nnot Romansh(vanny)\n\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Romansh(x)) <- forall x (Existent(x) -> Ceremonial(x)) <- forall x (Overnight(x) -> Existent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Kaiser is unportable. Camila is unending. Tildi is just. Charmain is chatty. All gammy people are gemmed. If someone is unending then they are gemmed. If someone is gothic then they are chatty. If someone is chatty then they are gemmed. All unending people are gammy. All unportable people are unending. If Camila is gammy and Camila is gemmed then Camila is unportable. All gammy people are just. Kaiser is chatty.", "logic": "\nUnportable(kaiser)\nUnending(camila)\nJust(tildi)\nChatty(charmain)\nforall x (Gammy(x) -> Gemmed(x))\nforall x (Unending(x) -> Gemmed(x))\nforall x (Gothic(x) -> Chatty(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Gemmed(x))\nforall x (Unending(x) -> Gammy(x))\nforall x (Unportable(x) -> Unending(x))\nGammy(camila) and Gemmed(camila) -> Unportable(camila)\nforall x (Gammy(x) -> Just(x))\n\nChatty(kaiser)\n\nforall x (Gothic(x) -> Chatty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Aubine is desegrated. Joao is xliv. Park is close. Percy is tameable. All alpine people are inpouring. If someone is xliv then they are inpouring. If someone is wholemeal then they are tameable. If someone is tameable then they are inpouring. All xliv people are alpine. All desegrated people are xliv. If Joao is alpine and Joao is inpouring then Joao is desegrated. All alpine people are close. Percy is not wholemeal.", "logic": "\nDesegrated(aubine)\nXliv(joao)\nClose(park)\nTameable(percy)\nforall x (Alpine(x) -> Inpouring(x))\nforall x (Xliv(x) -> Inpouring(x))\nforall x (Wholemeal(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Tameable(x) -> Inpouring(x))\nforall x (Xliv(x) -> Alpine(x))\nforall x (Desegrated(x) -> Xliv(x))\nAlpine(joao) and Inpouring(joao) -> Desegrated(joao)\nforall x (Alpine(x) -> Close(x))\n\nnot Wholemeal(percy)\n\nnot Wholemeal(percy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Tessy is catoptric. Nikos is rattled. Sol is blooming. Arnie is monestrous. All deific people are ultimate. If someone is rattled then they are ultimate. If someone is lamplit then they are monestrous. If someone is monestrous then they are ultimate. All rattled people are deific. All catoptric people are rattled. If Nikos is deific and Nikos is ultimate then Nikos is catoptric. All deific people are blooming. Sol is catoptric.", "logic": "\nCatoptric(tessy)\nRattled(nikos)\nBlooming(sol)\nMonestrous(arnie)\nforall x (Deific(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Monestrous(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Deific(x))\nforall x (Catoptric(x) -> Rattled(x))\nDeific(nikos) and Ultimate(nikos) -> Catoptric(nikos)\nforall x (Deific(x) -> Blooming(x))\n\nCatoptric(sol)\n\nCatoptric(sol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Clayborne is sleeveless. Marchall is outermost. Xavier is semisoft. Hart is principal. All favorite people are accessible. If someone is outermost then they are accessible. If someone is untried then they are principal. If someone is principal then they are accessible. All outermost people are favorite. All sleeveless people are outermost. If Marchall is favorite and Marchall is accessible then Marchall is sleeveless. All favorite people are semisoft. Xavier is not untried.", "logic": "\nSleeveless(clayborne)\nOutermost(marchall)\nSemisoft(xavier)\nPrincipal(hart)\nforall x (Favorite(x) -> Accessible(x))\nforall x (Outermost(x) -> Accessible(x))\nforall x (Untried(x) -> Principal(x))\nforall x (Principal(x) -> Accessible(x))\nforall x (Outermost(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Outermost(x))\nFavorite(marchall) and Accessible(marchall) -> Sleeveless(marchall)\nforall x (Favorite(x) -> Semisoft(x))\n\nnot Untried(xavier)\n\nnot Untried(xavier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Trev is slashing. Danice is achromous. Barron is propellant. Luisa is heartfelt. All dynamical people are stilted. If someone is achromous then they are stilted. If someone is manky then they are heartfelt. If someone is heartfelt then they are stilted. All achromous people are dynamical. All slashing people are achromous. If Danice is dynamical and Danice is stilted then Danice is slashing. All dynamical people are propellant. Trev is manky.", "logic": "\nSlashing(trev)\nAchromous(danice)\nPropellant(barron)\nHeartfelt(luisa)\nforall x (Dynamical(x) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Manky(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Dynamical(x))\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Achromous(x))\nDynamical(danice) and Stilted(danice) -> Slashing(danice)\nforall x (Dynamical(x) -> Propellant(x))\n\nManky(trev)\n\nManky(trev) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "The fifi zipper the hakeem. The fifi rubberise the gusta. The fifi rubberise the hakeem. The fifi venture the gusta. The fifi venture the hakeem. The gusta is rhodesian. The gusta is impressive. The gusta zipper the fifi. The gusta zipper the hakeem. The gusta rubberise the hakeem. The gusta does not visit the hakeem. The hakeem venture the gusta. If something rubberise the hakeem then it is mislaid. If something is impressive then it does not visit the hakeem. If something rubberise the gusta and the gusta does not need the hakeem then the gusta is rhodesian. If something is mislaid then it venture the gusta. If something venture the gusta then it is not accusative. If the fifi is impressive then the fifi rubberise the hakeem. The fifi zipper the hakeem.", "logic": "\nZipper(fifi, hakeem)\nRubberise(fifi, gusta)\nRubberise(fifi, hakeem)\nVenture(fifi, gusta)\nVenture(fifi, hakeem)\nRhodesian(gusta)\nImpressive(gusta)\nZipper(gusta, fifi)\nZipper(gusta, hakeem)\nRubberise(gusta, hakeem)\nnot Venture(gusta, hakeem)\nVenture(hakeem, gusta)\nforall x (Rubberise(x, hakeem) -> Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Impressive(x) -> not Venture(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Rubberise(x, gusta) and not Rubberise(gusta, hakeem) -> Rhodesian(gusta))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> Venture(x, gusta))\nforall x (Venture(x, gusta) -> not Accusative(x))\nImpressive(fifi) -> Rubberise(fifi, hakeem)\n\nZipper(fifi, hakeem)\n\ntherefore Zipper(fifi, hakeem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The wendie port the amelita. The wendie fancy the lonee. The wendie fancy the amelita. The wendie inhibit the lonee. The wendie inhibit the amelita. The lonee is expandible. The lonee is sounding. The lonee port the wendie. The lonee port the amelita. The lonee fancy the amelita. The lonee does not visit the amelita. The amelita inhibit the lonee. If something fancy the amelita then it is unwary. If something is sounding then it does not visit the amelita. If something fancy the lonee and the lonee does not need the amelita then the lonee is expandible. If something is unwary then it inhibit the lonee. If something inhibit the lonee then it is not uneducated. If the wendie is sounding then the wendie fancy the amelita. The lonee does not like the amelita.", "logic": "\nPort(wendie, amelita)\nFancy(wendie, lonee)\nFancy(wendie, amelita)\nInhibit(wendie, lonee)\nInhibit(wendie, amelita)\nExpandible(lonee)\nSounding(lonee)\nPort(lonee, wendie)\nPort(lonee, amelita)\nFancy(lonee, amelita)\nnot Inhibit(lonee, amelita)\nInhibit(amelita, lonee)\nforall x (Fancy(x, amelita) -> Unwary(x))\nforall x (Sounding(x) -> not Inhibit(x, amelita))\nforall x (Fancy(x, lonee) and not Fancy(lonee, amelita) -> Expandible(lonee))\nforall x (Unwary(x) -> Inhibit(x, lonee))\nforall x (Inhibit(x, lonee) -> not Uneducated(x))\nSounding(wendie) -> Fancy(wendie, amelita)\n\nnot Port(lonee, amelita)\n\ntherefore Port(lonee, amelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The hezekiah unman the genny. The hezekiah dinge the friedric. The hezekiah dinge the genny. The hezekiah extinguish the friedric. The hezekiah extinguish the genny. The friedric is quaternate. The friedric is fascinated. The friedric unman the hezekiah. The friedric unman the genny. The friedric dinge the genny. The friedric does not visit the genny. The genny extinguish the friedric. If something dinge the genny then it is faveolate. If something is fascinated then it does not visit the genny. If something dinge the friedric and the friedric does not need the genny then the friedric is quaternate. If something is faveolate then it extinguish the friedric. If something extinguish the friedric then it is not nonplussed. If the hezekiah is fascinated then the hezekiah dinge the genny. The hezekiah is not nonplussed.", "logic": "\nUnman(hezekiah, genny)\nDinge(hezekiah, friedric)\nDinge(hezekiah, genny)\nExtinguish(hezekiah, friedric)\nExtinguish(hezekiah, genny)\nQuaternate(friedric)\nFascinated(friedric)\nUnman(friedric, hezekiah)\nUnman(friedric, genny)\nDinge(friedric, genny)\nnot Extinguish(friedric, genny)\nExtinguish(genny, friedric)\nforall x (Dinge(x, genny) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Fascinated(x) -> not Extinguish(x, genny))\nforall x (Dinge(x, friedric) and not Dinge(friedric, genny) -> Quaternate(friedric))\nforall x (Faveolate(x) -> Extinguish(x, friedric))\nforall x (Extinguish(x, friedric) -> not Nonplussed(x))\nFascinated(hezekiah) -> Dinge(hezekiah, genny)\n\nnot Nonplussed(hezekiah)\n\nExtinguish(hezekiah, friedric) and forall x (Extinguish(x, friedric) -> not Nonplussed(x)) -> therefore not Nonplussed(hezekiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The gaston attune the rhodie. The gaston railroad the archy. The gaston railroad the rhodie. The gaston hydrolyse the archy. The gaston hydrolyse the rhodie. The archy is triple. The archy is throated. The archy attune the gaston. The archy attune the rhodie. The archy railroad the rhodie. The archy does not visit the rhodie. The rhodie hydrolyse the archy. If something railroad the rhodie then it is injurious. If something is throated then it does not visit the rhodie. If something railroad the archy and the archy does not need the rhodie then the archy is triple. If something is injurious then it hydrolyse the archy. If something hydrolyse the archy then it is not rapacious. If the gaston is throated then the gaston railroad the rhodie. The archy is not injurious.", "logic": "\nAttune(gaston, rhodie)\nRailroad(gaston, archy)\nRailroad(gaston, rhodie)\nHydrolyse(gaston, archy)\nHydrolyse(gaston, rhodie)\nTriple(archy)\nThroated(archy)\nAttune(archy, gaston)\nAttune(archy, rhodie)\nRailroad(archy, rhodie)\nnot Hydrolyse(archy, rhodie)\nHydrolyse(rhodie, archy)\nforall x (Railroad(x, rhodie) -> Injurious(x))\nforall x (Throated(x) -> not Hydrolyse(x, rhodie))\nforall x (Railroad(x, archy) and not Railroad(archy, rhodie) -> Triple(archy))\nforall x (Injurious(x) -> Hydrolyse(x, archy))\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, archy) -> not Rapacious(x))\nThroated(gaston) -> Railroad(gaston, rhodie)\n\nnot Injurious(archy)\n\nRailroad(archy, rhodie) and forall x (Railroad(x, rhodie) -> Injurious(x)) -> therefore Injurious(archy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The clemmy portend the emera. The clemmy mutate the elliot. The clemmy mutate the emera. The clemmy undrape the elliot. The clemmy undrape the emera. The elliot is racial. The elliot is assignable. The elliot portend the clemmy. The elliot portend the emera. The elliot mutate the emera. The elliot does not visit the emera. The emera undrape the elliot. If something mutate the emera then it is cherubic. If something is assignable then it does not visit the emera. If something mutate the elliot and the elliot does not need the emera then the elliot is racial. If something is cherubic then it undrape the elliot. If something undrape the elliot then it is not mature. If the clemmy is assignable then the clemmy mutate the emera. The elliot undrape the elliot.", "logic": "\nPortend(clemmy, emera)\nMutate(clemmy, elliot)\nMutate(clemmy, emera)\nUndrape(clemmy, elliot)\nUndrape(clemmy, emera)\nRacial(elliot)\nAssignable(elliot)\nPortend(elliot, clemmy)\nPortend(elliot, emera)\nMutate(elliot, emera)\nnot Undrape(elliot, emera)\nUndrape(emera, elliot)\nforall x (Mutate(x, emera) -> Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Assignable(x) -> not Undrape(x, emera))\nforall x (Mutate(x, elliot) and not Mutate(elliot, emera) -> Racial(elliot))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) -> Undrape(x, elliot))\nforall x (Undrape(x, elliot) -> not Mature(x))\nAssignable(clemmy) -> Mutate(clemmy, emera)\n\nUndrape(elliot, elliot)\n\nMutate(elliot, emera) and forall x (Mutate(x, emera) -> Cherubic(x)) -> therefore Cherubic(elliot) Cherubic(elliot) and forall x (Cherubic(x) -> Undrape(x, elliot)) -> therefore Undrape(elliot, elliot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The karin spit the genvieve. The karin work the obie. The karin work the genvieve. The karin apportion the obie. The karin apportion the genvieve. The obie is latticed. The obie is frontal. The obie spit the karin. The obie spit the genvieve. The obie work the genvieve. The obie does not visit the genvieve. The genvieve apportion the obie. If something work the genvieve then it is flickering. If something is frontal then it does not visit the genvieve. If something work the obie and the obie does not need the genvieve then the obie is latticed. If something is flickering then it apportion the obie. If something apportion the obie then it is not hornless. If the karin is frontal then the karin work the genvieve. The obie does not visit the obie.", "logic": "\nSpit(karin, genvieve)\nWork(karin, obie)\nWork(karin, genvieve)\nApportion(karin, obie)\nApportion(karin, genvieve)\nLatticed(obie)\nFrontal(obie)\nSpit(obie, karin)\nSpit(obie, genvieve)\nWork(obie, genvieve)\nnot Apportion(obie, genvieve)\nApportion(genvieve, obie)\nforall x (Work(x, genvieve) -> Flickering(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> not Apportion(x, genvieve))\nforall x (Work(x, obie) and not Work(obie, genvieve) -> Latticed(obie))\nforall x (Flickering(x) -> Apportion(x, obie))\nforall x (Apportion(x, obie) -> not Hornless(x))\nFrontal(karin) -> Work(karin, genvieve)\n\nnot Apportion(obie, obie)\n\nWork(obie, genvieve) and forall x (Work(x, genvieve) -> Flickering(x)) -> therefore Flickering(obie) Flickering(obie) and forall x (Flickering(x) -> Apportion(x, obie)) -> therefore Apportion(obie, obie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The dominique influence the drew. The dominique simonize the kingsly. The dominique simonize the drew. The dominique bypass the kingsly. The dominique bypass the drew. The kingsly is minacious. The kingsly is meshed. The kingsly influence the dominique. The kingsly influence the drew. The kingsly simonize the drew. The kingsly does not visit the drew. The drew bypass the kingsly. If something simonize the drew then it is thematic. If something is meshed then it does not visit the drew. If something simonize the kingsly and the kingsly does not need the drew then the kingsly is minacious. If something is thematic then it bypass the kingsly. If something bypass the kingsly then it is not nonkosher. If the dominique is meshed then the dominique simonize the drew. The kingsly is not nonkosher.", "logic": "\nInfluence(dominique, drew)\nSimonize(dominique, kingsly)\nSimonize(dominique, drew)\nBypass(dominique, kingsly)\nBypass(dominique, drew)\nMinacious(kingsly)\nMeshed(kingsly)\nInfluence(kingsly, dominique)\nInfluence(kingsly, drew)\nSimonize(kingsly, drew)\nnot Bypass(kingsly, drew)\nBypass(drew, kingsly)\nforall x (Simonize(x, drew) -> Thematic(x))\nforall x (Meshed(x) -> not Bypass(x, drew))\nforall x (Simonize(x, kingsly) and not Simonize(kingsly, drew) -> Minacious(kingsly))\nforall x (Thematic(x) -> Bypass(x, kingsly))\nforall x (Bypass(x, kingsly) -> not Nonkosher(x))\nMeshed(dominique) -> Simonize(dominique, drew)\n\nnot Nonkosher(kingsly)\n\nSimonize(kingsly, drew) and forall x (Simonize(x, drew) -> Thematic(x)) -> therefore Thematic(kingsly) Thematic(kingsly) and forall x (Thematic(x) -> Bypass(x, kingsly)) -> therefore Bypass(kingsly, kingsly) Bypass(kingsly, kingsly) and forall x (Bypass(x, kingsly) -> not Nonkosher(x)) -> therefore not Nonkosher(kingsly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The dominica deionize the gale. The dominica float the alis. The dominica float the gale. The dominica mist the alis. The dominica mist the gale. The alis is tillable. The alis is bitterish. The alis deionize the dominica. The alis deionize the gale. The alis float the gale. The alis does not visit the gale. The gale mist the alis. If something float the gale then it is imperial. If something is bitterish then it does not visit the gale. If something float the alis and the alis does not need the gale then the alis is tillable. If something is imperial then it mist the alis. If something mist the alis then it is not paralyzed. If the dominica is bitterish then the dominica float the gale. The alis is paralyzed.", "logic": "\nDeionize(dominica, gale)\nFloat(dominica, alis)\nFloat(dominica, gale)\nMist(dominica, alis)\nMist(dominica, gale)\nTillable(alis)\nBitterish(alis)\nDeionize(alis, dominica)\nDeionize(alis, gale)\nFloat(alis, gale)\nnot Mist(alis, gale)\nMist(gale, alis)\nforall x (Float(x, gale) -> Imperial(x))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) -> not Mist(x, gale))\nforall x (Float(x, alis) and not Float(alis, gale) -> Tillable(alis))\nforall x (Imperial(x) -> Mist(x, alis))\nforall x (Mist(x, alis) -> not Paralyzed(x))\nBitterish(dominica) -> Float(dominica, gale)\n\nParalyzed(alis)\n\nFloat(alis, gale) and forall x (Float(x, gale) -> Imperial(x)) -> therefore Imperial(alis) Imperial(alis) and forall x (Imperial(x) -> Mist(x, alis)) -> therefore Mist(alis, alis) Mist(alis, alis) and forall x (Mist(x, alis) -> not Paralyzed(x)) -> therefore not Paralyzed(alis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The karia josh the jennilee. The karia photograph the nessie. The karia photograph the jennilee. The karia engild the nessie. The karia engild the jennilee. The nessie is emeritus. The nessie is honorable. The nessie josh the karia. The nessie josh the jennilee. The nessie photograph the jennilee. The nessie does not visit the jennilee. The jennilee engild the nessie. If something photograph the jennilee then it is audenesque. If something is honorable then it does not visit the jennilee. If something photograph the nessie and the nessie does not need the jennilee then the nessie is emeritus. If something is audenesque then it engild the nessie. If something engild the nessie then it is not relieved. If the karia is honorable then the karia photograph the jennilee. The jennilee is not audenesque.", "logic": "\nJosh(karia, jennilee)\nPhotograph(karia, nessie)\nPhotograph(karia, jennilee)\nEngild(karia, nessie)\nEngild(karia, jennilee)\nEmeritus(nessie)\nHonorable(nessie)\nJosh(nessie, karia)\nJosh(nessie, jennilee)\nPhotograph(nessie, jennilee)\nnot Engild(nessie, jennilee)\nEngild(jennilee, nessie)\nforall x (Photograph(x, jennilee) -> Audenesque(x))\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> not Engild(x, jennilee))\nforall x (Photograph(x, nessie) and not Photograph(nessie, jennilee) -> Emeritus(nessie))\nforall x (Audenesque(x) -> Engild(x, nessie))\nforall x (Engild(x, nessie) -> not Relieved(x))\nHonorable(karia) -> Photograph(karia, jennilee)\n\nnot Audenesque(jennilee)\n\nforall x (Photograph(x, jennilee) -> Audenesque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The ilse burglarise the delcina. The ilse honour the steven. The ilse honour the delcina. The ilse suspire the steven. The ilse suspire the delcina. The steven is tortious. The steven is swollen. The steven burglarise the ilse. The steven burglarise the delcina. The steven honour the delcina. The steven does not visit the delcina. The delcina suspire the steven. If something honour the delcina then it is plummy. If something is swollen then it does not visit the delcina. If something honour the steven and the steven does not need the delcina then the steven is tortious. If something is plummy then it suspire the steven. If something suspire the steven then it is not boeotian. If the ilse is swollen then the ilse honour the delcina. The delcina honour the ilse.", "logic": "\nBurglarise(ilse, delcina)\nHonour(ilse, steven)\nHonour(ilse, delcina)\nSuspire(ilse, steven)\nSuspire(ilse, delcina)\nTortious(steven)\nSwollen(steven)\nBurglarise(steven, ilse)\nBurglarise(steven, delcina)\nHonour(steven, delcina)\nnot Suspire(steven, delcina)\nSuspire(delcina, steven)\nforall x (Honour(x, delcina) -> Plummy(x))\nforall x (Swollen(x) -> not Suspire(x, delcina))\nforall x (Honour(x, steven) and not Honour(steven, delcina) -> Tortious(steven))\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> Suspire(x, steven))\nforall x (Suspire(x, steven) -> not Boeotian(x))\nSwollen(ilse) -> Honour(ilse, delcina)\n\nHonour(delcina, ilse)\n\nHonour(delcina, ilse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The kevin rime the barth. The kevin cross the binny. The kevin cross the barth. The kevin photostat the binny. The kevin photostat the barth. The binny is indigent. The binny is outdoorsy. The binny rime the kevin. The binny rime the barth. The binny cross the barth. The binny does not visit the barth. The barth photostat the binny. If something cross the barth then it is laudable. If something is outdoorsy then it does not visit the barth. If something cross the binny and the binny does not need the barth then the binny is indigent. If something is laudable then it photostat the binny. If something photostat the binny then it is not debauched. If the kevin is outdoorsy then the kevin cross the barth. The kevin is not indigent.", "logic": "\nRime(kevin, barth)\nCross(kevin, binny)\nCross(kevin, barth)\nPhotostat(kevin, binny)\nPhotostat(kevin, barth)\nIndigent(binny)\nOutdoorsy(binny)\nRime(binny, kevin)\nRime(binny, barth)\nCross(binny, barth)\nnot Photostat(binny, barth)\nPhotostat(barth, binny)\nforall x (Cross(x, barth) -> Laudable(x))\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) -> not Photostat(x, barth))\nforall x (Cross(x, binny) and not Cross(binny, barth) -> Indigent(binny))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Photostat(x, binny))\nforall x (Photostat(x, binny) -> not Debauched(x))\nOutdoorsy(kevin) -> Cross(kevin, barth)\n\nnot Indigent(kevin)\n\nnot Indigent(kevin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The becca swinge the micaela. The becca thrash the jessalyn. The becca thrash the micaela. The becca weightlift the jessalyn. The becca weightlift the micaela. The jessalyn is peroneal. The jessalyn is descending. The jessalyn swinge the becca. The jessalyn swinge the micaela. The jessalyn thrash the micaela. The jessalyn does not visit the micaela. The micaela weightlift the jessalyn. If something thrash the micaela then it is genital. If something is descending then it does not visit the micaela. If something thrash the jessalyn and the jessalyn does not need the micaela then the jessalyn is peroneal. If something is genital then it weightlift the jessalyn. If something weightlift the jessalyn then it is not turbid. If the becca is descending then the becca thrash the micaela. The becca weightlift the becca.", "logic": "\nSwinge(becca, micaela)\nThrash(becca, jessalyn)\nThrash(becca, micaela)\nWeightlift(becca, jessalyn)\nWeightlift(becca, micaela)\nPeroneal(jessalyn)\nDescending(jessalyn)\nSwinge(jessalyn, becca)\nSwinge(jessalyn, micaela)\nThrash(jessalyn, micaela)\nnot Weightlift(jessalyn, micaela)\nWeightlift(micaela, jessalyn)\nforall x (Thrash(x, micaela) -> Genital(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) -> not Weightlift(x, micaela))\nforall x (Thrash(x, jessalyn) and not Thrash(jessalyn, micaela) -> Peroneal(jessalyn))\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Weightlift(x, jessalyn))\nforall x (Weightlift(x, jessalyn) -> not Turbid(x))\nDescending(becca) -> Thrash(becca, micaela)\n\nWeightlift(becca, becca)\n\nWeightlift(becca, becca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The leoine vitalize the oralla. The leoine tank the frankie. The leoine tank the oralla. The leoine abridge the frankie. The leoine abridge the oralla. The frankie is roaring. The frankie is genic. The frankie vitalize the leoine. The frankie vitalize the oralla. The frankie tank the oralla. The frankie does not visit the oralla. The oralla abridge the frankie. If something tank the oralla then it is shallow. If something is genic then it does not visit the oralla. If something tank the frankie and the frankie does not need the oralla then the frankie is roaring. If something is shallow then it abridge the frankie. If something abridge the frankie then it is not coeval. If the leoine is genic then the leoine tank the oralla. The leoine is not genic.", "logic": "\nVitalize(leoine, oralla)\nTank(leoine, frankie)\nTank(leoine, oralla)\nAbridge(leoine, frankie)\nAbridge(leoine, oralla)\nRoaring(frankie)\nGenic(frankie)\nVitalize(frankie, leoine)\nVitalize(frankie, oralla)\nTank(frankie, oralla)\nnot Abridge(frankie, oralla)\nAbridge(oralla, frankie)\nforall x (Tank(x, oralla) -> Shallow(x))\nforall x (Genic(x) -> not Abridge(x, oralla))\nforall x (Tank(x, frankie) and not Tank(frankie, oralla) -> Roaring(frankie))\nforall x (Shallow(x) -> Abridge(x, frankie))\nforall x (Abridge(x, frankie) -> not Coeval(x))\nGenic(leoine) -> Tank(leoine, oralla)\n\nnot Genic(leoine)\n\nnot Genic(leoine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The sybil tile the hendrika. The sybil open the karissa. The sybil open the hendrika. The sybil mechanise the karissa. The sybil mechanise the hendrika. The karissa is arterial. The karissa is muggy. The karissa tile the sybil. The karissa tile the hendrika. The karissa open the hendrika. The karissa does not visit the hendrika. The hendrika mechanise the karissa. If something open the hendrika then it is choosey. If something is muggy then it does not visit the hendrika. If something open the karissa and the karissa does not need the hendrika then the karissa is arterial. If something is choosey then it mechanise the karissa. If something mechanise the karissa then it is not formulated. If the sybil is muggy then the sybil open the hendrika. The karissa tile the karissa.", "logic": "\nTile(sybil, hendrika)\nOpen(sybil, karissa)\nOpen(sybil, hendrika)\nMechanise(sybil, karissa)\nMechanise(sybil, hendrika)\nArterial(karissa)\nMuggy(karissa)\nTile(karissa, sybil)\nTile(karissa, hendrika)\nOpen(karissa, hendrika)\nnot Mechanise(karissa, hendrika)\nMechanise(hendrika, karissa)\nforall x (Open(x, hendrika) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Muggy(x) -> not Mechanise(x, hendrika))\nforall x (Open(x, karissa) and not Open(karissa, hendrika) -> Arterial(karissa))\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Mechanise(x, karissa))\nforall x (Mechanise(x, karissa) -> not Formulated(x))\nMuggy(sybil) -> Open(sybil, hendrika)\n\nTile(karissa, karissa)\n\nTile(karissa, karissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The britte demonize the kirk. The britte meet the lisabeth. The britte meet the kirk. The britte capsulise the lisabeth. The britte capsulise the kirk. The lisabeth is british. The lisabeth is numeric. The lisabeth demonize the britte. The lisabeth demonize the kirk. The lisabeth meet the kirk. The lisabeth does not visit the kirk. The kirk capsulise the lisabeth. If something meet the kirk then it is paltry. If something is numeric then it does not visit the kirk. If something meet the lisabeth and the lisabeth does not need the kirk then the lisabeth is british. If something is paltry then it capsulise the lisabeth. If something capsulise the lisabeth then it is not aphaeretic. If the britte is numeric then the britte meet the kirk. The lisabeth does not need the britte.", "logic": "\nDemonize(britte, kirk)\nMeet(britte, lisabeth)\nMeet(britte, kirk)\nCapsulise(britte, lisabeth)\nCapsulise(britte, kirk)\nBritish(lisabeth)\nNumeric(lisabeth)\nDemonize(lisabeth, britte)\nDemonize(lisabeth, kirk)\nMeet(lisabeth, kirk)\nnot Capsulise(lisabeth, kirk)\nCapsulise(kirk, lisabeth)\nforall x (Meet(x, kirk) -> Paltry(x))\nforall x (Numeric(x) -> not Capsulise(x, kirk))\nforall x (Meet(x, lisabeth) and not Meet(lisabeth, kirk) -> British(lisabeth))\nforall x (Paltry(x) -> Capsulise(x, lisabeth))\nforall x (Capsulise(x, lisabeth) -> not Aphaeretic(x))\nNumeric(britte) -> Meet(britte, kirk)\n\nnot Meet(lisabeth, britte)\n\nnot Meet(lisabeth, britte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The elysia confirm the clara. The elysia nudge the dari. The elysia nudge the clara. The elysia pass the dari. The elysia pass the clara. The dari is halcyon. The dari is bicolour. The dari confirm the elysia. The dari confirm the clara. The dari nudge the clara. The dari does not visit the clara. The clara pass the dari. If something nudge the clara then it is feisty. If something is bicolour then it does not visit the clara. If something nudge the dari and the dari does not need the clara then the dari is halcyon. If something is feisty then it pass the dari. If something pass the dari then it is not rearing. If the elysia is bicolour then the elysia nudge the clara. The elysia confirm the dari.", "logic": "\nConfirm(elysia, clara)\nNudge(elysia, dari)\nNudge(elysia, clara)\nPass(elysia, dari)\nPass(elysia, clara)\nHalcyon(dari)\nBicolour(dari)\nConfirm(dari, elysia)\nConfirm(dari, clara)\nNudge(dari, clara)\nnot Pass(dari, clara)\nPass(clara, dari)\nforall x (Nudge(x, clara) -> Feisty(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) -> not Pass(x, clara))\nforall x (Nudge(x, dari) and not Nudge(dari, clara) -> Halcyon(dari))\nforall x (Feisty(x) -> Pass(x, dari))\nforall x (Pass(x, dari) -> not Rearing(x))\nBicolour(elysia) -> Nudge(elysia, clara)\n\nConfirm(elysia, dari)\n\nConfirm(elysia, dari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The fae peep the cobb. The cobb debut the gonzalo. The gonzalo peep the cobb. If the fae peep the cobb then the cobb peep the gonzalo. If the fae is verifiable and the fae peep the cobb then the cobb is epideictic. If someone is chalybeate then they are epideictic. If someone attend the fae and they chase the fae then the fae peep the gonzalo. If someone is bountiful and sketchy then they chase the cobb. If someone debut the fae and they see the gonzalo then the fae is epideictic. If someone peep the gonzalo then the gonzalo is epideictic. If someone is epideictic then they like the cobb. The fae peep the cobb.", "logic": "\nPeep(fae, cobb)\nDebut(cobb, gonzalo)\nPeep(gonzalo, cobb)\nPeep(fae, cobb) -> Peep(cobb, gonzalo)\nVerifiable(fae) and Peep(fae, cobb) -> Epideictic(cobb)\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) -> Epideictic(x))\nforall x (Attend(x, fae) and Peep(x, fae) -> Peep(fae, gonzalo))\nforall x (Bountiful(x) and Sketchy(x) -> Peep(x, cobb))\nforall x (Debut(x, fae) and Attend(x, gonzalo) -> Epideictic(fae))\nforall x (Peep(x, gonzalo) -> Epideictic(gonzalo))\nforall x (Epideictic(x) -> Debut(x, cobb))\n\nPeep(fae, cobb)\n\ntherefore Peep(fae, cobb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The robbyn bastinado the angelina. The angelina petition the madeline. The madeline bastinado the angelina. If the robbyn bastinado the angelina then the angelina bastinado the madeline. If the robbyn is profound and the robbyn bastinado the angelina then the angelina is diastolic. If someone is accentual then they are diastolic. If someone humbug the robbyn and they chase the robbyn then the robbyn bastinado the madeline. If someone is impenitent and copular then they chase the angelina. If someone petition the robbyn and they see the madeline then the robbyn is diastolic. If someone bastinado the madeline then the madeline is diastolic. If someone is diastolic then they like the angelina. The robbyn does not chase the angelina.", "logic": "\nBastinado(robbyn, angelina)\nPetition(angelina, madeline)\nBastinado(madeline, angelina)\nBastinado(robbyn, angelina) -> Bastinado(angelina, madeline)\nProfound(robbyn) and Bastinado(robbyn, angelina) -> Diastolic(angelina)\nforall x (Accentual(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Humbug(x, robbyn) and Bastinado(x, robbyn) -> Bastinado(robbyn, madeline))\nforall x (Impenitent(x) and Copular(x) -> Bastinado(x, angelina))\nforall x (Petition(x, robbyn) and Humbug(x, madeline) -> Diastolic(robbyn))\nforall x (Bastinado(x, madeline) -> Diastolic(madeline))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) -> Petition(x, angelina))\n\nnot Bastinado(robbyn, angelina)\n\ntherefore Bastinado(robbyn, angelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The lita alight the verene. The verene uncover the matilde. The matilde alight the verene. If the lita alight the verene then the verene alight the matilde. If the lita is phenotypic and the lita alight the verene then the verene is nontoxic. If someone is lathery then they are nontoxic. If someone photostat the lita and they chase the lita then the lita alight the matilde. If someone is measured and saurian then they chase the verene. If someone uncover the lita and they see the matilde then the lita is nontoxic. If someone alight the matilde then the matilde is nontoxic. If someone is nontoxic then they like the verene. The verene alight the matilde.", "logic": "\nAlight(lita, verene)\nUncover(verene, matilde)\nAlight(matilde, verene)\nAlight(lita, verene) -> Alight(verene, matilde)\nPhenotypic(lita) and Alight(lita, verene) -> Nontoxic(verene)\nforall x (Lathery(x) -> Nontoxic(x))\nforall x (Photostat(x, lita) and Alight(x, lita) -> Alight(lita, matilde))\nforall x (Measured(x) and Saurian(x) -> Alight(x, verene))\nforall x (Uncover(x, lita) and Photostat(x, matilde) -> Nontoxic(lita))\nforall x (Alight(x, matilde) -> Nontoxic(matilde))\nforall x (Nontoxic(x) -> Uncover(x, verene))\n\nAlight(verene, matilde)\n\nAlight(lita, verene) and Alight(lita, verene) -> Alight(verene, matilde) -> therefore Alight(verene, matilde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The leland insult the chariot. The chariot squall the magna. The magna insult the chariot. If the leland insult the chariot then the chariot insult the magna. If the leland is shaping and the leland insult the chariot then the chariot is nitric. If someone is benthal then they are nitric. If someone tipple the leland and they chase the leland then the leland insult the magna. If someone is pervasive and nonionized then they chase the chariot. If someone squall the leland and they see the magna then the leland is nitric. If someone insult the magna then the magna is nitric. If someone is nitric then they like the chariot. The chariot does not chase the magna.", "logic": "\nInsult(leland, chariot)\nSquall(chariot, magna)\nInsult(magna, chariot)\nInsult(leland, chariot) -> Insult(chariot, magna)\nShaping(leland) and Insult(leland, chariot) -> Nitric(chariot)\nforall x (Benthal(x) -> Nitric(x))\nforall x (Tipple(x, leland) and Insult(x, leland) -> Insult(leland, magna))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and Nonionized(x) -> Insult(x, chariot))\nforall x (Squall(x, leland) and Tipple(x, magna) -> Nitric(leland))\nforall x (Insult(x, magna) -> Nitric(magna))\nforall x (Nitric(x) -> Squall(x, chariot))\n\nnot Insult(chariot, magna)\n\nInsult(leland, chariot) and Insult(leland, chariot) -> Insult(chariot, magna) -> therefore Insult(chariot, magna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The chrystel undo the winifred. The winifred mound the penny. The penny undo the winifred. If the chrystel undo the winifred then the winifred undo the penny. If the chrystel is smokeless and the chrystel undo the winifred then the winifred is hangdog. If someone is sluttish then they are hangdog. If someone backstop the chrystel and they chase the chrystel then the chrystel undo the penny. If someone is substitute and chronic then they chase the winifred. If someone mound the chrystel and they see the penny then the chrystel is hangdog. If someone undo the penny then the penny is hangdog. If someone is hangdog then they like the winifred. The penny is hangdog.", "logic": "\nUndo(chrystel, winifred)\nMound(winifred, penny)\nUndo(penny, winifred)\nUndo(chrystel, winifred) -> Undo(winifred, penny)\nSmokeless(chrystel) and Undo(chrystel, winifred) -> Hangdog(winifred)\nforall x (Sluttish(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Backstop(x, chrystel) and Undo(x, chrystel) -> Undo(chrystel, penny))\nforall x (Substitute(x) and Chronic(x) -> Undo(x, winifred))\nforall x (Mound(x, chrystel) and Backstop(x, penny) -> Hangdog(chrystel))\nforall x (Undo(x, penny) -> Hangdog(penny))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) -> Mound(x, winifred))\n\nHangdog(penny)\n\nUndo(chrystel, winifred) and Undo(chrystel, winifred) -> Undo(winifred, penny) -> therefore Undo(winifred, penny) Undo(winifred, penny) and forall x (Undo(x, penny) -> Hangdog(penny)) -> therefore Hangdog(penny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The theresina perennate the ioana. The ioana sleep the geraldine. The geraldine perennate the ioana. If the theresina perennate the ioana then the ioana perennate the geraldine. If the theresina is delighted and the theresina perennate the ioana then the ioana is apropos. If someone is aphyllous then they are apropos. If someone capitalize the theresina and they chase the theresina then the theresina perennate the geraldine. If someone is northbound and cupulate then they chase the ioana. If someone sleep the theresina and they see the geraldine then the theresina is apropos. If someone perennate the geraldine then the geraldine is apropos. If someone is apropos then they like the ioana. The geraldine is not apropos.", "logic": "\nPerennate(theresina, ioana)\nSleep(ioana, geraldine)\nPerennate(geraldine, ioana)\nPerennate(theresina, ioana) -> Perennate(ioana, geraldine)\nDelighted(theresina) and Perennate(theresina, ioana) -> Apropos(ioana)\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Capitalize(x, theresina) and Perennate(x, theresina) -> Perennate(theresina, geraldine))\nforall x (Northbound(x) and Cupulate(x) -> Perennate(x, ioana))\nforall x (Sleep(x, theresina) and Capitalize(x, geraldine) -> Apropos(theresina))\nforall x (Perennate(x, geraldine) -> Apropos(geraldine))\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Sleep(x, ioana))\n\nnot Apropos(geraldine)\n\nPerennate(theresina, ioana) and Perennate(theresina, ioana) -> Perennate(ioana, geraldine) -> therefore Perennate(ioana, geraldine) Perennate(ioana, geraldine) and forall x (Perennate(x, geraldine) -> Apropos(geraldine)) -> therefore Apropos(geraldine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The artie decelerate the margret. The margret load the towney. The towney decelerate the margret. If the artie decelerate the margret then the margret decelerate the towney. If the artie is aloof and the artie decelerate the margret then the margret is listed. If someone is maverick then they are listed. If someone desorb the artie and they chase the artie then the artie decelerate the towney. If someone is accumbent and pycnotic then they chase the margret. If someone load the artie and they see the towney then the artie is listed. If someone decelerate the towney then the towney is listed. If someone is listed then they like the margret. The towney load the margret.", "logic": "\nDecelerate(artie, margret)\nLoad(margret, towney)\nDecelerate(towney, margret)\nDecelerate(artie, margret) -> Decelerate(margret, towney)\nAloof(artie) and Decelerate(artie, margret) -> Listed(margret)\nforall x (Maverick(x) -> Listed(x))\nforall x (Desorb(x, artie) and Decelerate(x, artie) -> Decelerate(artie, towney))\nforall x (Accumbent(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Decelerate(x, margret))\nforall x (Load(x, artie) and Desorb(x, towney) -> Listed(artie))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, towney) -> Listed(towney))\nforall x (Listed(x) -> Load(x, margret))\n\nLoad(towney, margret)\n\nDecelerate(artie, margret) and Decelerate(artie, margret) -> Decelerate(margret, towney) -> therefore Decelerate(margret, towney) Decelerate(margret, towney) and forall x (Decelerate(x, towney) -> Listed(towney)) -> therefore Listed(towney) Listed(towney) and forall x (Listed(x) -> Load(x, margret)) -> therefore Load(towney, margret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The nicki condescend the arnoldo. The arnoldo define the tait. The tait condescend the arnoldo. If the nicki condescend the arnoldo then the arnoldo condescend the tait. If the nicki is engaged and the nicki condescend the arnoldo then the arnoldo is okay. If someone is checked then they are okay. If someone boondoggle the nicki and they chase the nicki then the nicki condescend the tait. If someone is even and volant then they chase the arnoldo. If someone define the nicki and they see the tait then the nicki is okay. If someone condescend the tait then the tait is okay. If someone is okay then they like the arnoldo. The tait does not like the arnoldo.", "logic": "\nCondescend(nicki, arnoldo)\nDefine(arnoldo, tait)\nCondescend(tait, arnoldo)\nCondescend(nicki, arnoldo) -> Condescend(arnoldo, tait)\nEngaged(nicki) and Condescend(nicki, arnoldo) -> Okay(arnoldo)\nforall x (Checked(x) -> Okay(x))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, nicki) and Condescend(x, nicki) -> Condescend(nicki, tait))\nforall x (Even(x) and Volant(x) -> Condescend(x, arnoldo))\nforall x (Define(x, nicki) and Boondoggle(x, tait) -> Okay(nicki))\nforall x (Condescend(x, tait) -> Okay(tait))\nforall x (Okay(x) -> Define(x, arnoldo))\n\nnot Define(tait, arnoldo)\n\nCondescend(nicki, arnoldo) and Condescend(nicki, arnoldo) -> Condescend(arnoldo, tait) -> therefore Condescend(arnoldo, tait) Condescend(arnoldo, tait) and forall x (Condescend(x, tait) -> Okay(tait)) -> therefore Okay(tait) Okay(tait) and forall x (Okay(x) -> Define(x, arnoldo)) -> therefore Define(tait, arnoldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The odelia demonize the shawnee. The shawnee reprocess the mariele. The mariele demonize the shawnee. If the odelia demonize the shawnee then the shawnee demonize the mariele. If the odelia is gainly and the odelia demonize the shawnee then the shawnee is crooked. If someone is soignee then they are crooked. If someone desex the odelia and they chase the odelia then the odelia demonize the mariele. If someone is unbooked and apnoeic then they chase the shawnee. If someone reprocess the odelia and they see the mariele then the odelia is crooked. If someone demonize the mariele then the mariele is crooked. If someone is crooked then they like the shawnee. The shawnee does not like the shawnee.", "logic": "\nDemonize(odelia, shawnee)\nReprocess(shawnee, mariele)\nDemonize(mariele, shawnee)\nDemonize(odelia, shawnee) -> Demonize(shawnee, mariele)\nGainly(odelia) and Demonize(odelia, shawnee) -> Crooked(shawnee)\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Desex(x, odelia) and Demonize(x, odelia) -> Demonize(odelia, mariele))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) and Apnoeic(x) -> Demonize(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Reprocess(x, odelia) and Desex(x, mariele) -> Crooked(odelia))\nforall x (Demonize(x, mariele) -> Crooked(mariele))\nforall x (Crooked(x) -> Reprocess(x, shawnee))\n\nnot Reprocess(shawnee, shawnee)\n\nforall x (Crooked(x) -> Reprocess(x, shawnee)) <- Gainly(odelia) and Demonize(odelia, shawnee) -> Crooked(shawnee) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The rahel string the niven. The niven shatter the guinna. The guinna string the niven. If the rahel string the niven then the niven string the guinna. If the rahel is crested and the rahel string the niven then the niven is summative. If someone is bionic then they are summative. If someone lock the rahel and they chase the rahel then the rahel string the guinna. If someone is hertzian and comal then they chase the niven. If someone shatter the rahel and they see the guinna then the rahel is summative. If someone string the guinna then the guinna is summative. If someone is summative then they like the niven. The rahel shatter the niven.", "logic": "\nString(rahel, niven)\nShatter(niven, guinna)\nString(guinna, niven)\nString(rahel, niven) -> String(niven, guinna)\nCrested(rahel) and String(rahel, niven) -> Summative(niven)\nforall x (Bionic(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Lock(x, rahel) and String(x, rahel) -> String(rahel, guinna))\nforall x (Hertzian(x) and Comal(x) -> String(x, niven))\nforall x (Shatter(x, rahel) and Lock(x, guinna) -> Summative(rahel))\nforall x (String(x, guinna) -> Summative(guinna))\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Shatter(x, niven))\n\nShatter(rahel, niven)\n\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Shatter(x, niven)) <- forall x (Bionic(x) -> Summative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The daffi badger the marie. The marie compute the verena. The verena badger the marie. If the daffi badger the marie then the marie badger the verena. If the daffi is unliveried and the daffi badger the marie then the marie is crippling. If someone is sign then they are crippling. If someone deactivate the daffi and they chase the daffi then the daffi badger the verena. If someone is gamy and iridaceous then they chase the marie. If someone compute the daffi and they see the verena then the daffi is crippling. If someone badger the verena then the verena is crippling. If someone is crippling then they like the marie. The marie does not chase the marie.", "logic": "\nBadger(daffi, marie)\nCompute(marie, verena)\nBadger(verena, marie)\nBadger(daffi, marie) -> Badger(marie, verena)\nUnliveried(daffi) and Badger(daffi, marie) -> Crippling(marie)\nforall x (Sign(x) -> Crippling(x))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, daffi) and Badger(x, daffi) -> Badger(daffi, verena))\nforall x (Gamy(x) and Iridaceous(x) -> Badger(x, marie))\nforall x (Compute(x, daffi) and Deactivate(x, verena) -> Crippling(daffi))\nforall x (Badger(x, verena) -> Crippling(verena))\nforall x (Crippling(x) -> Compute(x, marie))\n\nnot Badger(marie, marie)\n\nforall x (Gamy(x) and Iridaceous(x) -> Badger(x, marie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The jeane glaciate the mortie. The mortie jackrabbit the jacynth. The jacynth glaciate the mortie. If the jeane glaciate the mortie then the mortie glaciate the jacynth. If the jeane is pastoral and the jeane glaciate the mortie then the mortie is potted. If someone is separative then they are potted. If someone outcall the jeane and they chase the jeane then the jeane glaciate the jacynth. If someone is revealing and monastical then they chase the mortie. If someone jackrabbit the jeane and they see the jacynth then the jeane is potted. If someone glaciate the jacynth then the jacynth is potted. If someone is potted then they like the mortie. The jeane is potted.", "logic": "\nGlaciate(jeane, mortie)\nJackrabbit(mortie, jacynth)\nGlaciate(jacynth, mortie)\nGlaciate(jeane, mortie) -> Glaciate(mortie, jacynth)\nPastoral(jeane) and Glaciate(jeane, mortie) -> Potted(mortie)\nforall x (Separative(x) -> Potted(x))\nforall x (Outcall(x, jeane) and Glaciate(x, jeane) -> Glaciate(jeane, jacynth))\nforall x (Revealing(x) and Monastical(x) -> Glaciate(x, mortie))\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, jeane) and Outcall(x, jacynth) -> Potted(jeane))\nforall x (Glaciate(x, jacynth) -> Potted(jacynth))\nforall x (Potted(x) -> Jackrabbit(x, mortie))\n\nPotted(jeane)\n\nforall x (Separative(x) -> Potted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The lily collocate the harriette. The harriette browbeat the faunie. The faunie collocate the harriette. If the lily collocate the harriette then the harriette collocate the faunie. If the lily is hindustani and the lily collocate the harriette then the harriette is battered. If someone is mirthful then they are battered. If someone spell the lily and they chase the lily then the lily collocate the faunie. If someone is spurting and eukaryotic then they chase the harriette. If someone browbeat the lily and they see the faunie then the lily is battered. If someone collocate the faunie then the faunie is battered. If someone is battered then they like the harriette. The lily does not like the faunie.", "logic": "\nCollocate(lily, harriette)\nBrowbeat(harriette, faunie)\nCollocate(faunie, harriette)\nCollocate(lily, harriette) -> Collocate(harriette, faunie)\nHindustani(lily) and Collocate(lily, harriette) -> Battered(harriette)\nforall x (Mirthful(x) -> Battered(x))\nforall x (Spell(x, lily) and Collocate(x, lily) -> Collocate(lily, faunie))\nforall x (Spurting(x) and Eukaryotic(x) -> Collocate(x, harriette))\nforall x (Browbeat(x, lily) and Spell(x, faunie) -> Battered(lily))\nforall x (Collocate(x, faunie) -> Battered(faunie))\nforall x (Battered(x) -> Browbeat(x, harriette))\n\nnot Browbeat(lily, faunie)\n\nnot Browbeat(lily, faunie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The tova pause the merill. The merill consult the lucila. The lucila pause the merill. If the tova pause the merill then the merill pause the lucila. If the tova is dexter and the tova pause the merill then the merill is lowered. If someone is admissible then they are lowered. If someone bracket the tova and they chase the tova then the tova pause the lucila. If someone is thalassic and gelatinous then they chase the merill. If someone consult the tova and they see the lucila then the tova is lowered. If someone pause the lucila then the lucila is lowered. If someone is lowered then they like the merill. The merill is gelatinous.", "logic": "\nPause(tova, merill)\nConsult(merill, lucila)\nPause(lucila, merill)\nPause(tova, merill) -> Pause(merill, lucila)\nDexter(tova) and Pause(tova, merill) -> Lowered(merill)\nforall x (Admissible(x) -> Lowered(x))\nforall x (Bracket(x, tova) and Pause(x, tova) -> Pause(tova, lucila))\nforall x (Thalassic(x) and Gelatinous(x) -> Pause(x, merill))\nforall x (Consult(x, tova) and Bracket(x, lucila) -> Lowered(tova))\nforall x (Pause(x, lucila) -> Lowered(lucila))\nforall x (Lowered(x) -> Consult(x, merill))\n\nGelatinous(merill)\n\nGelatinous(merill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The allyce bitch the shauna. The shauna plane the nolie. The nolie bitch the shauna. If the allyce bitch the shauna then the shauna bitch the nolie. If the allyce is carnal and the allyce bitch the shauna then the shauna is cured. If someone is rhizoidal then they are cured. If someone rummage the allyce and they chase the allyce then the allyce bitch the nolie. If someone is centered and literal then they chase the shauna. If someone plane the allyce and they see the nolie then the allyce is cured. If someone bitch the nolie then the nolie is cured. If someone is cured then they like the shauna. The nolie is not rhizoidal.", "logic": "\nBitch(allyce, shauna)\nPlane(shauna, nolie)\nBitch(nolie, shauna)\nBitch(allyce, shauna) -> Bitch(shauna, nolie)\nCarnal(allyce) and Bitch(allyce, shauna) -> Cured(shauna)\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Rummage(x, allyce) and Bitch(x, allyce) -> Bitch(allyce, nolie))\nforall x (Centered(x) and Literal(x) -> Bitch(x, shauna))\nforall x (Plane(x, allyce) and Rummage(x, nolie) -> Cured(allyce))\nforall x (Bitch(x, nolie) -> Cured(nolie))\nforall x (Cured(x) -> Plane(x, shauna))\n\nnot Rhizoidal(nolie)\n\nnot Rhizoidal(nolie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The harman farrow the garrett. The garrett tremble the evaleen. The evaleen farrow the garrett. If the harman farrow the garrett then the garrett farrow the evaleen. If the harman is explicable and the harman farrow the garrett then the garrett is chantlike. If someone is unstable then they are chantlike. If someone demean the harman and they chase the harman then the harman farrow the evaleen. If someone is acting and cardiac then they chase the garrett. If someone tremble the harman and they see the evaleen then the harman is chantlike. If someone farrow the evaleen then the evaleen is chantlike. If someone is chantlike then they like the garrett. The harman is explicable.", "logic": "\nFarrow(harman, garrett)\nTremble(garrett, evaleen)\nFarrow(evaleen, garrett)\nFarrow(harman, garrett) -> Farrow(garrett, evaleen)\nExplicable(harman) and Farrow(harman, garrett) -> Chantlike(garrett)\nforall x (Unstable(x) -> Chantlike(x))\nforall x (Demean(x, harman) and Farrow(x, harman) -> Farrow(harman, evaleen))\nforall x (Acting(x) and Cardiac(x) -> Farrow(x, garrett))\nforall x (Tremble(x, harman) and Demean(x, evaleen) -> Chantlike(harman))\nforall x (Farrow(x, evaleen) -> Chantlike(evaleen))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> Tremble(x, garrett))\n\nExplicable(harman)\n\nExplicable(harman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The diandra is fulgid. The diandra is windswept. The diandra belly the darrick. The diandra declutch the nev. The darrick is fulgid. The darrick is insurgent. The darrick is windswept. The darrick belly the diandra. The darrick mimeograph the diandra. The darrick mimeograph the nev. The darrick declutch the diandra. The darrick declutch the nev. The nev is rectal. The nev is fulgid. The nev is insurgent. The nev belly the diandra. If someone declutch the nev then the nev mimeograph the darrick. If someone is fulgid and rectal then they visit the diandra. If someone declutch the darrick then they like the darrick. If someone mimeograph the darrick then they visit the darrick. If someone is bustling and fulgid then they like the nev. If the darrick is fulgid and the darrick mimeograph the diandra then the darrick belly the diandra. The darrick is windswept.", "logic": "\nFulgid(diandra)\nWindswept(diandra)\nBelly(diandra, darrick)\nDeclutch(diandra, nev)\nFulgid(darrick)\nInsurgent(darrick)\nWindswept(darrick)\nBelly(darrick, diandra)\nMimeograph(darrick, diandra)\nMimeograph(darrick, nev)\nDeclutch(darrick, diandra)\nDeclutch(darrick, nev)\nRectal(nev)\nFulgid(nev)\nInsurgent(nev)\nBelly(nev, diandra)\nforall x (Declutch(x, nev) -> Mimeograph(nev, darrick))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) and Rectal(x) -> Declutch(x, diandra))\nforall x (Declutch(x, darrick) -> Belly(x, darrick))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, darrick) -> Declutch(x, darrick))\nforall x (Bustling(x) and Fulgid(x) -> Belly(x, nev))\nFulgid(darrick) and Mimeograph(darrick, diandra) -> Belly(darrick, diandra)\n\nWindswept(darrick)\n\ntherefore Windswept(darrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The kaster is abroad. The kaster is apolitical. The kaster dismember the marko. The kaster tenderize the oliy. The marko is abroad. The marko is rimose. The marko is apolitical. The marko dismember the kaster. The marko destruct the kaster. The marko destruct the oliy. The marko tenderize the kaster. The marko tenderize the oliy. The oliy is sixteen. The oliy is abroad. The oliy is rimose. The oliy dismember the kaster. If someone tenderize the oliy then the oliy destruct the marko. If someone is abroad and sixteen then they visit the kaster. If someone tenderize the marko then they like the marko. If someone destruct the marko then they visit the marko. If someone is jiggered and abroad then they like the oliy. If the marko is abroad and the marko destruct the kaster then the marko dismember the kaster. The kaster does not like the marko.", "logic": "\nAbroad(kaster)\nApolitical(kaster)\nDismember(kaster, marko)\nTenderize(kaster, oliy)\nAbroad(marko)\nRimose(marko)\nApolitical(marko)\nDismember(marko, kaster)\nDestruct(marko, kaster)\nDestruct(marko, oliy)\nTenderize(marko, kaster)\nTenderize(marko, oliy)\nSixteen(oliy)\nAbroad(oliy)\nRimose(oliy)\nDismember(oliy, kaster)\nforall x (Tenderize(x, oliy) -> Destruct(oliy, marko))\nforall x (Abroad(x) and Sixteen(x) -> Tenderize(x, kaster))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, marko) -> Dismember(x, marko))\nforall x (Destruct(x, marko) -> Tenderize(x, marko))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) and Abroad(x) -> Dismember(x, oliy))\nAbroad(marko) and Destruct(marko, kaster) -> Dismember(marko, kaster)\n\nnot Dismember(kaster, marko)\n\ntherefore Dismember(kaster, marko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The elsinore is nosey. The elsinore is sericeous. The elsinore seize the herbie. The elsinore unarm the bradley. The herbie is nosey. The herbie is adorned. The herbie is sericeous. The herbie seize the elsinore. The herbie barnstorm the elsinore. The herbie barnstorm the bradley. The herbie unarm the elsinore. The herbie unarm the bradley. The bradley is pustulate. The bradley is nosey. The bradley is adorned. The bradley seize the elsinore. If someone unarm the bradley then the bradley barnstorm the herbie. If someone is nosey and pustulate then they visit the elsinore. If someone unarm the herbie then they like the herbie. If someone barnstorm the herbie then they visit the herbie. If someone is marbleised and nosey then they like the bradley. If the herbie is nosey and the herbie barnstorm the elsinore then the herbie seize the elsinore. The bradley unarm the elsinore.", "logic": "\nNosey(elsinore)\nSericeous(elsinore)\nSeize(elsinore, herbie)\nUnarm(elsinore, bradley)\nNosey(herbie)\nAdorned(herbie)\nSericeous(herbie)\nSeize(herbie, elsinore)\nBarnstorm(herbie, elsinore)\nBarnstorm(herbie, bradley)\nUnarm(herbie, elsinore)\nUnarm(herbie, bradley)\nPustulate(bradley)\nNosey(bradley)\nAdorned(bradley)\nSeize(bradley, elsinore)\nforall x (Unarm(x, bradley) -> Barnstorm(bradley, herbie))\nforall x (Nosey(x) and Pustulate(x) -> Unarm(x, elsinore))\nforall x (Unarm(x, herbie) -> Seize(x, herbie))\nforall x (Barnstorm(x, herbie) -> Unarm(x, herbie))\nforall x (Marbleised(x) and Nosey(x) -> Seize(x, bradley))\nNosey(herbie) and Barnstorm(herbie, elsinore) -> Seize(herbie, elsinore)\n\nUnarm(bradley, elsinore)\n\nNosey(bradley) and Pustulate(bradley) and forall x (Nosey(x) and Pustulate(x) -> Unarm(x, elsinore)) -> therefore Unarm(bradley, elsinore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The samuel is deluxe. The samuel is utterable. The samuel scrimmage the pierson. The samuel tire the suki. The pierson is deluxe. The pierson is incurvate. The pierson is utterable. The pierson scrimmage the samuel. The pierson reenforce the samuel. The pierson reenforce the suki. The pierson tire the samuel. The pierson tire the suki. The suki is necked. The suki is deluxe. The suki is incurvate. The suki scrimmage the samuel. If someone tire the suki then the suki reenforce the pierson. If someone is deluxe and necked then they visit the samuel. If someone tire the pierson then they like the pierson. If someone reenforce the pierson then they visit the pierson. If someone is smooth and deluxe then they like the suki. If the pierson is deluxe and the pierson reenforce the samuel then the pierson scrimmage the samuel. The suki does not visit the samuel.", "logic": "\nDeluxe(samuel)\nUtterable(samuel)\nScrimmage(samuel, pierson)\nTire(samuel, suki)\nDeluxe(pierson)\nIncurvate(pierson)\nUtterable(pierson)\nScrimmage(pierson, samuel)\nReenforce(pierson, samuel)\nReenforce(pierson, suki)\nTire(pierson, samuel)\nTire(pierson, suki)\nNecked(suki)\nDeluxe(suki)\nIncurvate(suki)\nScrimmage(suki, samuel)\nforall x (Tire(x, suki) -> Reenforce(suki, pierson))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) and Necked(x) -> Tire(x, samuel))\nforall x (Tire(x, pierson) -> Scrimmage(x, pierson))\nforall x (Reenforce(x, pierson) -> Tire(x, pierson))\nforall x (Smooth(x) and Deluxe(x) -> Scrimmage(x, suki))\nDeluxe(pierson) and Reenforce(pierson, samuel) -> Scrimmage(pierson, samuel)\n\nnot Tire(suki, samuel)\n\nDeluxe(suki) and Necked(suki) and forall x (Deluxe(x) and Necked(x) -> Tire(x, samuel)) -> therefore Tire(suki, samuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The birdie is front. The birdie is lotic. The birdie knit the alberto. The birdie lust the remington. The alberto is front. The alberto is sabbatical. The alberto is lotic. The alberto knit the birdie. The alberto flaunt the birdie. The alberto flaunt the remington. The alberto lust the birdie. The alberto lust the remington. The remington is foursquare. The remington is front. The remington is sabbatical. The remington knit the birdie. If someone lust the remington then the remington flaunt the alberto. If someone is front and foursquare then they visit the birdie. If someone lust the alberto then they like the alberto. If someone flaunt the alberto then they visit the alberto. If someone is alvine and front then they like the remington. If the alberto is front and the alberto flaunt the birdie then the alberto knit the birdie. The remington lust the alberto.", "logic": "\nFront(birdie)\nLotic(birdie)\nKnit(birdie, alberto)\nLust(birdie, remington)\nFront(alberto)\nSabbatical(alberto)\nLotic(alberto)\nKnit(alberto, birdie)\nFlaunt(alberto, birdie)\nFlaunt(alberto, remington)\nLust(alberto, birdie)\nLust(alberto, remington)\nFoursquare(remington)\nFront(remington)\nSabbatical(remington)\nKnit(remington, birdie)\nforall x (Lust(x, remington) -> Flaunt(remington, alberto))\nforall x (Front(x) and Foursquare(x) -> Lust(x, birdie))\nforall x (Lust(x, alberto) -> Knit(x, alberto))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, alberto) -> Lust(x, alberto))\nforall x (Alvine(x) and Front(x) -> Knit(x, remington))\nFront(alberto) and Flaunt(alberto, birdie) -> Knit(alberto, birdie)\n\nLust(remington, alberto)\n\nLust(alberto, remington) and forall x (Lust(x, remington) -> Flaunt(remington, alberto)) -> therefore Flaunt(remington, alberto) Flaunt(remington, alberto) and forall x (Flaunt(x, alberto) -> Lust(x, alberto)) -> therefore Lust(remington, alberto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The vasilis is twoscore. The vasilis is prismatic. The vasilis spat the georges. The vasilis bear the margi. The georges is twoscore. The georges is antibiotic. The georges is prismatic. The georges spat the vasilis. The georges hook the vasilis. The georges hook the margi. The georges bear the vasilis. The georges bear the margi. The margi is priceless. The margi is twoscore. The margi is antibiotic. The margi spat the vasilis. If someone bear the margi then the margi hook the georges. If someone is twoscore and priceless then they visit the vasilis. If someone bear the georges then they like the georges. If someone hook the georges then they visit the georges. If someone is worthy and twoscore then they like the margi. If the georges is twoscore and the georges hook the vasilis then the georges spat the vasilis. The margi does not visit the georges.", "logic": "\nTwoscore(vasilis)\nPrismatic(vasilis)\nSpat(vasilis, georges)\nBear(vasilis, margi)\nTwoscore(georges)\nAntibiotic(georges)\nPrismatic(georges)\nSpat(georges, vasilis)\nHook(georges, vasilis)\nHook(georges, margi)\nBear(georges, vasilis)\nBear(georges, margi)\nPriceless(margi)\nTwoscore(margi)\nAntibiotic(margi)\nSpat(margi, vasilis)\nforall x (Bear(x, margi) -> Hook(margi, georges))\nforall x (Twoscore(x) and Priceless(x) -> Bear(x, vasilis))\nforall x (Bear(x, georges) -> Spat(x, georges))\nforall x (Hook(x, georges) -> Bear(x, georges))\nforall x (Worthy(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Spat(x, margi))\nTwoscore(georges) and Hook(georges, vasilis) -> Spat(georges, vasilis)\n\nnot Bear(margi, georges)\n\nBear(georges, margi) and forall x (Bear(x, margi) -> Hook(margi, georges)) -> therefore Hook(margi, georges) Hook(margi, georges) and forall x (Hook(x, georges) -> Bear(x, georges)) -> therefore Bear(margi, georges)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The byram is finished. The byram is hydric. The byram dilate the anstice. The byram restart the easter. The anstice is finished. The anstice is unrentable. The anstice is hydric. The anstice dilate the byram. The anstice full the byram. The anstice full the easter. The anstice restart the byram. The anstice restart the easter. The easter is brainy. The easter is finished. The easter is unrentable. The easter dilate the byram. If someone restart the easter then the easter full the anstice. If someone is finished and brainy then they visit the byram. If someone restart the anstice then they like the anstice. If someone full the anstice then they visit the anstice. If someone is settled and finished then they like the easter. If the anstice is finished and the anstice full the byram then the anstice dilate the byram. The easter dilate the anstice.", "logic": "\nFinished(byram)\nHydric(byram)\nDilate(byram, anstice)\nRestart(byram, easter)\nFinished(anstice)\nUnrentable(anstice)\nHydric(anstice)\nDilate(anstice, byram)\nFull(anstice, byram)\nFull(anstice, easter)\nRestart(anstice, byram)\nRestart(anstice, easter)\nBrainy(easter)\nFinished(easter)\nUnrentable(easter)\nDilate(easter, byram)\nforall x (Restart(x, easter) -> Full(easter, anstice))\nforall x (Finished(x) and Brainy(x) -> Restart(x, byram))\nforall x (Restart(x, anstice) -> Dilate(x, anstice))\nforall x (Full(x, anstice) -> Restart(x, anstice))\nforall x (Settled(x) and Finished(x) -> Dilate(x, easter))\nFinished(anstice) and Full(anstice, byram) -> Dilate(anstice, byram)\n\nDilate(easter, anstice)\n\nRestart(anstice, easter) and forall x (Restart(x, easter) -> Full(easter, anstice)) -> therefore Full(easter, anstice) Full(easter, anstice) and forall x (Full(x, anstice) -> Restart(x, anstice)) -> therefore Restart(easter, anstice) Restart(easter, anstice) and forall x (Restart(x, anstice) -> Dilate(x, anstice)) -> therefore Dilate(easter, anstice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The valentia is listless. The valentia is tarry. The valentia experience the tabbitha. The valentia lysogenize the viv. The tabbitha is listless. The tabbitha is ilxx. The tabbitha is tarry. The tabbitha experience the valentia. The tabbitha prang the valentia. The tabbitha prang the viv. The tabbitha lysogenize the valentia. The tabbitha lysogenize the viv. The viv is setaceous. The viv is listless. The viv is ilxx. The viv experience the valentia. If someone lysogenize the viv then the viv prang the tabbitha. If someone is listless and setaceous then they visit the valentia. If someone lysogenize the tabbitha then they like the tabbitha. If someone prang the tabbitha then they visit the tabbitha. If someone is practised and listless then they like the viv. If the tabbitha is listless and the tabbitha prang the valentia then the tabbitha experience the valentia. The viv does not like the tabbitha.", "logic": "\nListless(valentia)\nTarry(valentia)\nExperience(valentia, tabbitha)\nLysogenize(valentia, viv)\nListless(tabbitha)\nIlxx(tabbitha)\nTarry(tabbitha)\nExperience(tabbitha, valentia)\nPrang(tabbitha, valentia)\nPrang(tabbitha, viv)\nLysogenize(tabbitha, valentia)\nLysogenize(tabbitha, viv)\nSetaceous(viv)\nListless(viv)\nIlxx(viv)\nExperience(viv, valentia)\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, viv) -> Prang(viv, tabbitha))\nforall x (Listless(x) and Setaceous(x) -> Lysogenize(x, valentia))\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, tabbitha) -> Experience(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Prang(x, tabbitha) -> Lysogenize(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Practised(x) and Listless(x) -> Experience(x, viv))\nListless(tabbitha) and Prang(tabbitha, valentia) -> Experience(tabbitha, valentia)\n\nnot Experience(viv, tabbitha)\n\nLysogenize(tabbitha, viv) and forall x (Lysogenize(x, viv) -> Prang(viv, tabbitha)) -> therefore Prang(viv, tabbitha) Prang(viv, tabbitha) and forall x (Prang(x, tabbitha) -> Lysogenize(x, tabbitha)) -> therefore Lysogenize(viv, tabbitha) Lysogenize(viv, tabbitha) and forall x (Lysogenize(x, tabbitha) -> Experience(x, tabbitha)) -> therefore Experience(viv, tabbitha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The maynord is fugal. The maynord is trigonal. The maynord agenise the carlee. The maynord teethe the dyann. The carlee is fugal. The carlee is laboured. The carlee is trigonal. The carlee agenise the maynord. The carlee preserve the maynord. The carlee preserve the dyann. The carlee teethe the maynord. The carlee teethe the dyann. The dyann is philippine. The dyann is fugal. The dyann is laboured. The dyann agenise the maynord. If someone teethe the dyann then the dyann preserve the carlee. If someone is fugal and philippine then they visit the maynord. If someone teethe the carlee then they like the carlee. If someone preserve the carlee then they visit the carlee. If someone is veinlike and fugal then they like the dyann. If the carlee is fugal and the carlee preserve the maynord then the carlee agenise the maynord. The maynord does not visit the carlee.", "logic": "\nFugal(maynord)\nTrigonal(maynord)\nAgenise(maynord, carlee)\nTeethe(maynord, dyann)\nFugal(carlee)\nLaboured(carlee)\nTrigonal(carlee)\nAgenise(carlee, maynord)\nPreserve(carlee, maynord)\nPreserve(carlee, dyann)\nTeethe(carlee, maynord)\nTeethe(carlee, dyann)\nPhilippine(dyann)\nFugal(dyann)\nLaboured(dyann)\nAgenise(dyann, maynord)\nforall x (Teethe(x, dyann) -> Preserve(dyann, carlee))\nforall x (Fugal(x) and Philippine(x) -> Teethe(x, maynord))\nforall x (Teethe(x, carlee) -> Agenise(x, carlee))\nforall x (Preserve(x, carlee) -> Teethe(x, carlee))\nforall x (Veinlike(x) and Fugal(x) -> Agenise(x, dyann))\nFugal(carlee) and Preserve(carlee, maynord) -> Agenise(carlee, maynord)\n\nnot Teethe(maynord, carlee)\n\nforall x (Preserve(x, carlee) -> Teethe(x, carlee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The nedi is monastic. The nedi is unbarreled. The nedi stash the abbie. The nedi beset the garry. The abbie is monastic. The abbie is recurrent. The abbie is unbarreled. The abbie stash the nedi. The abbie distemper the nedi. The abbie distemper the garry. The abbie beset the nedi. The abbie beset the garry. The garry is lobed. The garry is monastic. The garry is recurrent. The garry stash the nedi. If someone beset the garry then the garry distemper the abbie. If someone is monastic and lobed then they visit the nedi. If someone beset the abbie then they like the abbie. If someone distemper the abbie then they visit the abbie. If someone is sleepy and monastic then they like the garry. If the abbie is monastic and the abbie distemper the nedi then the abbie stash the nedi. The garry stash the garry.", "logic": "\nMonastic(nedi)\nUnbarreled(nedi)\nStash(nedi, abbie)\nBeset(nedi, garry)\nMonastic(abbie)\nRecurrent(abbie)\nUnbarreled(abbie)\nStash(abbie, nedi)\nDistemper(abbie, nedi)\nDistemper(abbie, garry)\nBeset(abbie, nedi)\nBeset(abbie, garry)\nLobed(garry)\nMonastic(garry)\nRecurrent(garry)\nStash(garry, nedi)\nforall x (Beset(x, garry) -> Distemper(garry, abbie))\nforall x (Monastic(x) and Lobed(x) -> Beset(x, nedi))\nforall x (Beset(x, abbie) -> Stash(x, abbie))\nforall x (Distemper(x, abbie) -> Beset(x, abbie))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Monastic(x) -> Stash(x, garry))\nMonastic(abbie) and Distemper(abbie, nedi) -> Stash(abbie, nedi)\n\nStash(garry, garry)\n\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Monastic(x) -> Stash(x, garry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The rusty is feeble. The rusty is snobbish. The rusty receive the maddy. The rusty effervesce the mayda. The maddy is feeble. The maddy is footsure. The maddy is snobbish. The maddy receive the rusty. The maddy confiscate the rusty. The maddy confiscate the mayda. The maddy effervesce the rusty. The maddy effervesce the mayda. The mayda is nominal. The mayda is feeble. The mayda is footsure. The mayda receive the rusty. If someone effervesce the mayda then the mayda confiscate the maddy. If someone is feeble and nominal then they visit the rusty. If someone effervesce the maddy then they like the maddy. If someone confiscate the maddy then they visit the maddy. If someone is catchy and feeble then they like the mayda. If the maddy is feeble and the maddy confiscate the rusty then the maddy receive the rusty. The rusty does not visit the rusty.", "logic": "\nFeeble(rusty)\nSnobbish(rusty)\nReceive(rusty, maddy)\nEffervesce(rusty, mayda)\nFeeble(maddy)\nFootsure(maddy)\nSnobbish(maddy)\nReceive(maddy, rusty)\nConfiscate(maddy, rusty)\nConfiscate(maddy, mayda)\nEffervesce(maddy, rusty)\nEffervesce(maddy, mayda)\nNominal(mayda)\nFeeble(mayda)\nFootsure(mayda)\nReceive(mayda, rusty)\nforall x (Effervesce(x, mayda) -> Confiscate(mayda, maddy))\nforall x (Feeble(x) and Nominal(x) -> Effervesce(x, rusty))\nforall x (Effervesce(x, maddy) -> Receive(x, maddy))\nforall x (Confiscate(x, maddy) -> Effervesce(x, maddy))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and Feeble(x) -> Receive(x, mayda))\nFeeble(maddy) and Confiscate(maddy, rusty) -> Receive(maddy, rusty)\n\nnot Effervesce(rusty, rusty)\n\nforall x (Feeble(x) and Nominal(x) -> Effervesce(x, rusty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The francisca is spiteful. The francisca is elysian. The francisca cartwheel the dunstan. The francisca munition the ilise. The dunstan is spiteful. The dunstan is chondritic. The dunstan is elysian. The dunstan cartwheel the francisca. The dunstan sphacelate the francisca. The dunstan sphacelate the ilise. The dunstan munition the francisca. The dunstan munition the ilise. The ilise is excusatory. The ilise is spiteful. The ilise is chondritic. The ilise cartwheel the francisca. If someone munition the ilise then the ilise sphacelate the dunstan. If someone is spiteful and excusatory then they visit the francisca. If someone munition the dunstan then they like the dunstan. If someone sphacelate the dunstan then they visit the dunstan. If someone is marbled and spiteful then they like the ilise. If the dunstan is spiteful and the dunstan sphacelate the francisca then the dunstan cartwheel the francisca. The dunstan munition the dunstan.", "logic": "\nSpiteful(francisca)\nElysian(francisca)\nCartwheel(francisca, dunstan)\nMunition(francisca, ilise)\nSpiteful(dunstan)\nChondritic(dunstan)\nElysian(dunstan)\nCartwheel(dunstan, francisca)\nSphacelate(dunstan, francisca)\nSphacelate(dunstan, ilise)\nMunition(dunstan, francisca)\nMunition(dunstan, ilise)\nExcusatory(ilise)\nSpiteful(ilise)\nChondritic(ilise)\nCartwheel(ilise, francisca)\nforall x (Munition(x, ilise) -> Sphacelate(ilise, dunstan))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) and Excusatory(x) -> Munition(x, francisca))\nforall x (Munition(x, dunstan) -> Cartwheel(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Sphacelate(x, dunstan) -> Munition(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Marbled(x) and Spiteful(x) -> Cartwheel(x, ilise))\nSpiteful(dunstan) and Sphacelate(dunstan, francisca) -> Cartwheel(dunstan, francisca)\n\nMunition(dunstan, dunstan)\n\nforall x (Sphacelate(x, dunstan) -> Munition(x, dunstan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The roxy is statuary. The roxy is concise. The roxy denigrate the rosina. The roxy tailor the wilek. The rosina is statuary. The rosina is faecal. The rosina is concise. The rosina denigrate the roxy. The rosina cascade the roxy. The rosina cascade the wilek. The rosina tailor the roxy. The rosina tailor the wilek. The wilek is suspect. The wilek is statuary. The wilek is faecal. The wilek denigrate the roxy. If someone tailor the wilek then the wilek cascade the rosina. If someone is statuary and suspect then they visit the roxy. If someone tailor the rosina then they like the rosina. If someone cascade the rosina then they visit the rosina. If someone is undersea and statuary then they like the wilek. If the rosina is statuary and the rosina cascade the roxy then the rosina denigrate the roxy. The roxy does not like the roxy.", "logic": "\nStatuary(roxy)\nConcise(roxy)\nDenigrate(roxy, rosina)\nTailor(roxy, wilek)\nStatuary(rosina)\nFaecal(rosina)\nConcise(rosina)\nDenigrate(rosina, roxy)\nCascade(rosina, roxy)\nCascade(rosina, wilek)\nTailor(rosina, roxy)\nTailor(rosina, wilek)\nSuspect(wilek)\nStatuary(wilek)\nFaecal(wilek)\nDenigrate(wilek, roxy)\nforall x (Tailor(x, wilek) -> Cascade(wilek, rosina))\nforall x (Statuary(x) and Suspect(x) -> Tailor(x, roxy))\nforall x (Tailor(x, rosina) -> Denigrate(x, rosina))\nforall x (Cascade(x, rosina) -> Tailor(x, rosina))\nforall x (Undersea(x) and Statuary(x) -> Denigrate(x, wilek))\nStatuary(rosina) and Cascade(rosina, roxy) -> Denigrate(rosina, roxy)\n\nnot Denigrate(roxy, roxy)\n\nnot Denigrate(roxy, roxy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The martie is ornery. The martie is undomestic. The martie specialize the reine. The martie encrimson the sondra. The reine is ornery. The reine is romaic. The reine is undomestic. The reine specialize the martie. The reine deploy the martie. The reine deploy the sondra. The reine encrimson the martie. The reine encrimson the sondra. The sondra is superlunar. The sondra is ornery. The sondra is romaic. The sondra specialize the martie. If someone encrimson the sondra then the sondra deploy the reine. If someone is ornery and superlunar then they visit the martie. If someone encrimson the reine then they like the reine. If someone deploy the reine then they visit the reine. If someone is bulky and ornery then they like the sondra. If the reine is ornery and the reine deploy the martie then the reine specialize the martie. The martie deploy the martie.", "logic": "\nOrnery(martie)\nUndomestic(martie)\nSpecialize(martie, reine)\nEncrimson(martie, sondra)\nOrnery(reine)\nRomaic(reine)\nUndomestic(reine)\nSpecialize(reine, martie)\nDeploy(reine, martie)\nDeploy(reine, sondra)\nEncrimson(reine, martie)\nEncrimson(reine, sondra)\nSuperlunar(sondra)\nOrnery(sondra)\nRomaic(sondra)\nSpecialize(sondra, martie)\nforall x (Encrimson(x, sondra) -> Deploy(sondra, reine))\nforall x (Ornery(x) and Superlunar(x) -> Encrimson(x, martie))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, reine) -> Specialize(x, reine))\nforall x (Deploy(x, reine) -> Encrimson(x, reine))\nforall x (Bulky(x) and Ornery(x) -> Specialize(x, sondra))\nOrnery(reine) and Deploy(reine, martie) -> Specialize(reine, martie)\n\nDeploy(martie, martie)\n\nDeploy(martie, martie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The danelle is pouring. The danelle is serrated. The danelle emphasize the jacqui. The danelle persist the electra. The jacqui is pouring. The jacqui is attractive. The jacqui is serrated. The jacqui emphasize the danelle. The jacqui erase the danelle. The jacqui erase the electra. The jacqui persist the danelle. The jacqui persist the electra. The electra is skirting. The electra is pouring. The electra is attractive. The electra emphasize the danelle. If someone persist the electra then the electra erase the jacqui. If someone is pouring and skirting then they visit the danelle. If someone persist the jacqui then they like the jacqui. If someone erase the jacqui then they visit the jacqui. If someone is gooselike and pouring then they like the electra. If the jacqui is pouring and the jacqui erase the danelle then the jacqui emphasize the danelle. The electra does not need the electra.", "logic": "\nPouring(danelle)\nSerrated(danelle)\nEmphasize(danelle, jacqui)\nPersist(danelle, electra)\nPouring(jacqui)\nAttractive(jacqui)\nSerrated(jacqui)\nEmphasize(jacqui, danelle)\nErase(jacqui, danelle)\nErase(jacqui, electra)\nPersist(jacqui, danelle)\nPersist(jacqui, electra)\nSkirting(electra)\nPouring(electra)\nAttractive(electra)\nEmphasize(electra, danelle)\nforall x (Persist(x, electra) -> Erase(electra, jacqui))\nforall x (Pouring(x) and Skirting(x) -> Persist(x, danelle))\nforall x (Persist(x, jacqui) -> Emphasize(x, jacqui))\nforall x (Erase(x, jacqui) -> Persist(x, jacqui))\nforall x (Gooselike(x) and Pouring(x) -> Emphasize(x, electra))\nPouring(jacqui) and Erase(jacqui, danelle) -> Emphasize(jacqui, danelle)\n\nnot Erase(electra, electra)\n\nnot Erase(electra, electra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The karlyn is embryonal. The karlyn is uncurved. The karlyn snake the rori. The karlyn replete the hussein. The rori is embryonal. The rori is blotched. The rori is uncurved. The rori snake the karlyn. The rori wassail the karlyn. The rori wassail the hussein. The rori replete the karlyn. The rori replete the hussein. The hussein is antenatal. The hussein is embryonal. The hussein is blotched. The hussein snake the karlyn. If someone replete the hussein then the hussein wassail the rori. If someone is embryonal and antenatal then they visit the karlyn. If someone replete the rori then they like the rori. If someone wassail the rori then they visit the rori. If someone is annalistic and embryonal then they like the hussein. If the rori is embryonal and the rori wassail the karlyn then the rori snake the karlyn. The karlyn is annalistic.", "logic": "\nEmbryonal(karlyn)\nUncurved(karlyn)\nSnake(karlyn, rori)\nReplete(karlyn, hussein)\nEmbryonal(rori)\nBlotched(rori)\nUncurved(rori)\nSnake(rori, karlyn)\nWassail(rori, karlyn)\nWassail(rori, hussein)\nReplete(rori, karlyn)\nReplete(rori, hussein)\nAntenatal(hussein)\nEmbryonal(hussein)\nBlotched(hussein)\nSnake(hussein, karlyn)\nforall x (Replete(x, hussein) -> Wassail(hussein, rori))\nforall x (Embryonal(x) and Antenatal(x) -> Replete(x, karlyn))\nforall x (Replete(x, rori) -> Snake(x, rori))\nforall x (Wassail(x, rori) -> Replete(x, rori))\nforall x (Annalistic(x) and Embryonal(x) -> Snake(x, hussein))\nEmbryonal(rori) and Wassail(rori, karlyn) -> Snake(rori, karlyn)\n\nAnnalistic(karlyn)\n\nAnnalistic(karlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The cher backlash the herculie. The herculie backlash the tory. The jimmie twit the herculie. The tory backlash the jimmie. If someone shingle the herculie and the herculie is dimmed then they eat the tory. All quenchless people are caducean. If someone backlash the jimmie then they eat the cher. If someone is bonelike and they like the herculie then the herculie shingle the cher. If someone twit the cher then they are quenchless. Green people are caducean. The jimmie twit the herculie.", "logic": "\nBacklash(cher, herculie)\nBacklash(herculie, tory)\nTwit(jimmie, herculie)\nBacklash(tory, jimmie)\nforall x (Shingle(x, herculie) and Dimmed(herculie) -> Twit(x, tory))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> Caducean(x))\nforall x (Backlash(x, jimmie) -> Twit(x, cher))\nforall x (Bonelike(x) and Shingle(x, herculie) -> Shingle(herculie, cher))\nforall x (Twit(x, cher) -> Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Bonelike(x) -> Caducean(x))\n\nTwit(jimmie, herculie)\n\ntherefore Twit(jimmie, herculie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The noam condescend the suzetta. The suzetta condescend the allyce. The sande snowboard the suzetta. The allyce condescend the sande. If someone serrate the suzetta and the suzetta is moderate then they eat the allyce. All cyprian people are amazing. If someone condescend the sande then they eat the noam. If someone is upcurved and they like the suzetta then the suzetta serrate the noam. If someone snowboard the noam then they are cyprian. Green people are amazing. The suzetta does not need the allyce.", "logic": "\nCondescend(noam, suzetta)\nCondescend(suzetta, allyce)\nSnowboard(sande, suzetta)\nCondescend(allyce, sande)\nforall x (Serrate(x, suzetta) and Moderate(suzetta) -> Snowboard(x, allyce))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Condescend(x, sande) -> Snowboard(x, noam))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Serrate(x, suzetta) -> Serrate(suzetta, noam))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, noam) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) -> Amazing(x))\n\nnot Condescend(suzetta, allyce)\n\ntherefore Condescend(suzetta, allyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The yancy vellicate the whittaker. The whittaker vellicate the wildon. The adelaide refreshen the whittaker. The wildon vellicate the adelaide. If someone simonise the whittaker and the whittaker is timorous then they eat the wildon. All ametabolic people are carthusian. If someone vellicate the adelaide then they eat the yancy. If someone is robust and they like the whittaker then the whittaker simonise the yancy. If someone refreshen the yancy then they are ametabolic. Green people are carthusian. The wildon refreshen the yancy.", "logic": "\nVellicate(yancy, whittaker)\nVellicate(whittaker, wildon)\nRefreshen(adelaide, whittaker)\nVellicate(wildon, adelaide)\nforall x (Simonise(x, whittaker) and Timorous(whittaker) -> Refreshen(x, wildon))\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) -> Carthusian(x))\nforall x (Vellicate(x, adelaide) -> Refreshen(x, yancy))\nforall x (Robust(x) and Simonise(x, whittaker) -> Simonise(whittaker, yancy))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, yancy) -> Ametabolic(x))\nforall x (Robust(x) -> Carthusian(x))\n\nRefreshen(wildon, yancy)\n\nVellicate(wildon, adelaide) and forall x (Vellicate(x, adelaide) -> Refreshen(x, yancy)) -> therefore Refreshen(wildon, yancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The xenos trek the rosabella. The rosabella trek the christof. The florida denazify the rosabella. The christof trek the florida. If someone powwow the rosabella and the rosabella is anabatic then they eat the christof. All caesarian people are christlike. If someone trek the florida then they eat the xenos. If someone is realistic and they like the rosabella then the rosabella powwow the xenos. If someone denazify the xenos then they are caesarian. Green people are christlike. The christof does not eat the xenos.", "logic": "\nTrek(xenos, rosabella)\nTrek(rosabella, christof)\nDenazify(florida, rosabella)\nTrek(christof, florida)\nforall x (Powwow(x, rosabella) and Anabatic(rosabella) -> Denazify(x, christof))\nforall x (Caesarian(x) -> Christlike(x))\nforall x (Trek(x, florida) -> Denazify(x, xenos))\nforall x (Realistic(x) and Powwow(x, rosabella) -> Powwow(rosabella, xenos))\nforall x (Denazify(x, xenos) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) -> Christlike(x))\n\nnot Denazify(christof, xenos)\n\nTrek(christof, florida) and forall x (Trek(x, florida) -> Denazify(x, xenos)) -> therefore Denazify(christof, xenos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The reena retract the brittan. The brittan retract the lotty. The prent abseil the brittan. The lotty retract the prent. If someone relent the brittan and the brittan is extricable then they eat the lotty. All unsymbolic people are treble. If someone retract the prent then they eat the reena. If someone is mechanic and they like the brittan then the brittan relent the reena. If someone abseil the reena then they are unsymbolic. Green people are treble. The lotty is unsymbolic.", "logic": "\nRetract(reena, brittan)\nRetract(brittan, lotty)\nAbseil(prent, brittan)\nRetract(lotty, prent)\nforall x (Relent(x, brittan) and Extricable(brittan) -> Abseil(x, lotty))\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Treble(x))\nforall x (Retract(x, prent) -> Abseil(x, reena))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) and Relent(x, brittan) -> Relent(brittan, reena))\nforall x (Abseil(x, reena) -> Unsymbolic(x))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) -> Treble(x))\n\nUnsymbolic(lotty)\n\nRetract(lotty, prent) and forall x (Retract(x, prent) -> Abseil(x, reena)) -> therefore Abseil(lotty, reena) Abseil(lotty, reena) and forall x (Abseil(x, reena) -> Unsymbolic(x)) -> therefore Unsymbolic(lotty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The rhody transpose the zandra. The zandra transpose the louie. The moshe docket the zandra. The louie transpose the moshe. If someone relay the zandra and the zandra is depleted then they eat the louie. All central people are thickset. If someone transpose the moshe then they eat the rhody. If someone is swedish and they like the zandra then the zandra relay the rhody. If someone docket the rhody then they are central. Green people are thickset. The louie is not central.", "logic": "\nTranspose(rhody, zandra)\nTranspose(zandra, louie)\nDocket(moshe, zandra)\nTranspose(louie, moshe)\nforall x (Relay(x, zandra) and Depleted(zandra) -> Docket(x, louie))\nforall x (Central(x) -> Thickset(x))\nforall x (Transpose(x, moshe) -> Docket(x, rhody))\nforall x (Swedish(x) and Relay(x, zandra) -> Relay(zandra, rhody))\nforall x (Docket(x, rhody) -> Central(x))\nforall x (Swedish(x) -> Thickset(x))\n\nnot Central(louie)\n\nTranspose(louie, moshe) and forall x (Transpose(x, moshe) -> Docket(x, rhody)) -> therefore Docket(louie, rhody) Docket(louie, rhody) and forall x (Docket(x, rhody) -> Central(x)) -> therefore Central(louie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The arabela clew the sula. The sula clew the blaine. The caspar deprive the sula. The blaine clew the caspar. If someone outwit the sula and the sula is twisting then they eat the blaine. All homocyclic people are emended. If someone clew the caspar then they eat the arabela. If someone is vile and they like the sula then the sula outwit the arabela. If someone deprive the arabela then they are homocyclic. Green people are emended. The blaine is emended.", "logic": "\nClew(arabela, sula)\nClew(sula, blaine)\nDeprive(caspar, sula)\nClew(blaine, caspar)\nforall x (Outwit(x, sula) and Twisting(sula) -> Deprive(x, blaine))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Clew(x, caspar) -> Deprive(x, arabela))\nforall x (Vile(x) and Outwit(x, sula) -> Outwit(sula, arabela))\nforall x (Deprive(x, arabela) -> Homocyclic(x))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Emended(x))\n\nEmended(blaine)\n\nClew(blaine, caspar) and forall x (Clew(x, caspar) -> Deprive(x, arabela)) -> therefore Deprive(blaine, arabela) Deprive(blaine, arabela) and forall x (Deprive(x, arabela) -> Homocyclic(x)) -> therefore Homocyclic(blaine) Homocyclic(blaine) and forall x (Homocyclic(x) -> Emended(x)) -> therefore Emended(blaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The wilburn harry the bernelle. The bernelle harry the minda. The thom swab the bernelle. The minda harry the thom. If someone dislike the bernelle and the bernelle is impenitent then they eat the minda. All prismatic people are vanished. If someone harry the thom then they eat the wilburn. If someone is isothermal and they like the bernelle then the bernelle dislike the wilburn. If someone swab the wilburn then they are prismatic. Green people are vanished. The minda is not vanished.", "logic": "\nHarry(wilburn, bernelle)\nHarry(bernelle, minda)\nSwab(thom, bernelle)\nHarry(minda, thom)\nforall x (Dislike(x, bernelle) and Impenitent(bernelle) -> Swab(x, minda))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) -> Vanished(x))\nforall x (Harry(x, thom) -> Swab(x, wilburn))\nforall x (Isothermal(x) and Dislike(x, bernelle) -> Dislike(bernelle, wilburn))\nforall x (Swab(x, wilburn) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Isothermal(x) -> Vanished(x))\n\nnot Vanished(minda)\n\nHarry(minda, thom) and forall x (Harry(x, thom) -> Swab(x, wilburn)) -> therefore Swab(minda, wilburn) Swab(minda, wilburn) and forall x (Swab(x, wilburn) -> Prismatic(x)) -> therefore Prismatic(minda) Prismatic(minda) and forall x (Prismatic(x) -> Vanished(x)) -> therefore Vanished(minda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The frances diazotize the sinclair. The sinclair diazotize the carilyn. The melita scram the sinclair. The carilyn diazotize the melita. If someone relapse the sinclair and the sinclair is meandering then they eat the carilyn. All orphaned people are alone. If someone diazotize the melita then they eat the frances. If someone is presumable and they like the sinclair then the sinclair relapse the frances. If someone scram the frances then they are orphaned. Green people are alone. The frances is not alone.", "logic": "\nDiazotize(frances, sinclair)\nDiazotize(sinclair, carilyn)\nScram(melita, sinclair)\nDiazotize(carilyn, melita)\nforall x (Relapse(x, sinclair) and Meandering(sinclair) -> Scram(x, carilyn))\nforall x (Orphaned(x) -> Alone(x))\nforall x (Diazotize(x, melita) -> Scram(x, frances))\nforall x (Presumable(x) and Relapse(x, sinclair) -> Relapse(sinclair, frances))\nforall x (Scram(x, frances) -> Orphaned(x))\nforall x (Presumable(x) -> Alone(x))\n\nnot Alone(frances)\n\nforall x (Orphaned(x) -> Alone(x)) <- forall x (Scram(x, frances) -> Orphaned(x)) <- forall x (Diazotize(x, melita) -> Scram(x, frances)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The olwen militarize the otis. The otis militarize the jemimah. The nelie summerize the otis. The jemimah militarize the nelie. If someone hate the otis and the otis is unyielding then they eat the jemimah. All rueful people are unscalable. If someone militarize the nelie then they eat the olwen. If someone is widowed and they like the otis then the otis hate the olwen. If someone summerize the olwen then they are rueful. Green people are unscalable. The nelie summerize the olwen.", "logic": "\nMilitarize(olwen, otis)\nMilitarize(otis, jemimah)\nSummerize(nelie, otis)\nMilitarize(jemimah, nelie)\nforall x (Hate(x, otis) and Unyielding(otis) -> Summerize(x, jemimah))\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Unscalable(x))\nforall x (Militarize(x, nelie) -> Summerize(x, olwen))\nforall x (Widowed(x) and Hate(x, otis) -> Hate(otis, olwen))\nforall x (Summerize(x, olwen) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Widowed(x) -> Unscalable(x))\n\nSummerize(nelie, olwen)\n\nforall x (Militarize(x, nelie) -> Summerize(x, olwen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The caresa throw the alica. The alica throw the olwen. The matti award the alica. The olwen throw the matti. If someone immolate the alica and the alica is calorific then they eat the olwen. All fretful people are leprous. If someone throw the matti then they eat the caresa. If someone is unranked and they like the alica then the alica immolate the caresa. If someone award the caresa then they are fretful. Green people are leprous. The matti is not fretful.", "logic": "\nThrow(caresa, alica)\nThrow(alica, olwen)\nAward(matti, alica)\nThrow(olwen, matti)\nforall x (Immolate(x, alica) and Calorific(alica) -> Award(x, olwen))\nforall x (Fretful(x) -> Leprous(x))\nforall x (Throw(x, matti) -> Award(x, caresa))\nforall x (Unranked(x) and Immolate(x, alica) -> Immolate(alica, caresa))\nforall x (Award(x, caresa) -> Fretful(x))\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> Leprous(x))\n\nnot Fretful(matti)\n\nforall x (Award(x, caresa) -> Fretful(x)) <- forall x (Throw(x, matti) -> Award(x, caresa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The iggie dispute the sparky. The sparky dispute the valenka. The cheryl grab the sparky. The valenka dispute the cheryl. If someone sedate the sparky and the sparky is slatternly then they eat the valenka. All fumed people are zany. If someone dispute the cheryl then they eat the iggie. If someone is vociferous and they like the sparky then the sparky sedate the iggie. If someone grab the iggie then they are fumed. Green people are zany. The cheryl grab the valenka.", "logic": "\nDispute(iggie, sparky)\nDispute(sparky, valenka)\nGrab(cheryl, sparky)\nDispute(valenka, cheryl)\nforall x (Sedate(x, sparky) and Slatternly(sparky) -> Grab(x, valenka))\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Zany(x))\nforall x (Dispute(x, cheryl) -> Grab(x, iggie))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) and Sedate(x, sparky) -> Sedate(sparky, iggie))\nforall x (Grab(x, iggie) -> Fumed(x))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Zany(x))\n\nGrab(cheryl, valenka)\n\nforall x (Sedate(x, sparky) and Slatternly(sparky) -> Grab(x, valenka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The ahmad quit the carlin. The carlin quit the gaston. The charlean sightsing the carlin. The gaston quit the charlean. If someone saddle the carlin and the carlin is azimuthal then they eat the gaston. All worse people are mailed. If someone quit the charlean then they eat the ahmad. If someone is blubbery and they like the carlin then the carlin saddle the ahmad. If someone sightsing the ahmad then they are worse. Green people are mailed. The charlean does not like the charlean.", "logic": "\nQuit(ahmad, carlin)\nQuit(carlin, gaston)\nSightsing(charlean, carlin)\nQuit(gaston, charlean)\nforall x (Saddle(x, carlin) and Azimuthal(carlin) -> Sightsing(x, gaston))\nforall x (Worse(x) -> Mailed(x))\nforall x (Quit(x, charlean) -> Sightsing(x, ahmad))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) and Saddle(x, carlin) -> Saddle(carlin, ahmad))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, ahmad) -> Worse(x))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Mailed(x))\n\nnot Saddle(charlean, charlean)\n\nnot Saddle(charlean, charlean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The belvia cover the zilvia. The zilvia cover the tedda. The kaylee infuscate the zilvia. The tedda cover the kaylee. If someone displease the zilvia and the zilvia is bimonthly then they eat the tedda. All upturned people are capacious. If someone cover the kaylee then they eat the belvia. If someone is uncrowded and they like the zilvia then the zilvia displease the belvia. If someone infuscate the belvia then they are upturned. Green people are capacious. The kaylee cover the tedda.", "logic": "\nCover(belvia, zilvia)\nCover(zilvia, tedda)\nInfuscate(kaylee, zilvia)\nCover(tedda, kaylee)\nforall x (Displease(x, zilvia) and Bimonthly(zilvia) -> Infuscate(x, tedda))\nforall x (Upturned(x) -> Capacious(x))\nforall x (Cover(x, kaylee) -> Infuscate(x, belvia))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) and Displease(x, zilvia) -> Displease(zilvia, belvia))\nforall x (Infuscate(x, belvia) -> Upturned(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Capacious(x))\n\nCover(kaylee, tedda)\n\nCover(kaylee, tedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The brear telex the madison. The madison telex the clarie. The vachel register the madison. The clarie telex the vachel. If someone stir the madison and the madison is aetiologic then they eat the clarie. All zonal people are unmedical. If someone telex the vachel then they eat the brear. If someone is cosy and they like the madison then the madison stir the brear. If someone register the brear then they are zonal. Green people are unmedical. The madison does not eat the madison.", "logic": "\nTelex(brear, madison)\nTelex(madison, clarie)\nRegister(vachel, madison)\nTelex(clarie, vachel)\nforall x (Stir(x, madison) and Aetiologic(madison) -> Register(x, clarie))\nforall x (Zonal(x) -> Unmedical(x))\nforall x (Telex(x, vachel) -> Register(x, brear))\nforall x (Cosy(x) and Stir(x, madison) -> Stir(madison, brear))\nforall x (Register(x, brear) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Cosy(x) -> Unmedical(x))\n\nnot Register(madison, madison)\n\nnot Register(madison, madison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The blanca englut the benjamin. The benjamin englut the carlen. The reece wreck the benjamin. The carlen englut the reece. If someone receipt the benjamin and the benjamin is literate then they eat the carlen. All stenosed people are wayfaring. If someone englut the reece then they eat the blanca. If someone is frictional and they like the benjamin then the benjamin receipt the blanca. If someone wreck the blanca then they are stenosed. Green people are wayfaring. The reece wreck the reece.", "logic": "\nEnglut(blanca, benjamin)\nEnglut(benjamin, carlen)\nWreck(reece, benjamin)\nEnglut(carlen, reece)\nforall x (Receipt(x, benjamin) and Literate(benjamin) -> Wreck(x, carlen))\nforall x (Stenosed(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Englut(x, reece) -> Wreck(x, blanca))\nforall x (Frictional(x) and Receipt(x, benjamin) -> Receipt(benjamin, blanca))\nforall x (Wreck(x, blanca) -> Stenosed(x))\nforall x (Frictional(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\n\nWreck(reece, reece)\n\nWreck(reece, reece) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The tanya relace the miguelita. The tanya relace the bee. The tanya is aplitic. The tanya bolster the bee. The tanya store the miguelita. The tanya store the bee. The miguelita relace the tanya. The miguelita relace the bee. The miguelita bolster the tanya. The bee relace the tanya. The bee is desolate. The bee is bounden. The bee bolster the tanya. The bee bolster the miguelita. The bee store the tanya. The bee store the miguelita. If something is desolate and it bolster the miguelita then the miguelita is sarawakian. If something relace the tanya then the tanya is aplitic. If something relace the bee and it is bounden then it relace the tanya. If something relace the tanya and it bolster the miguelita then the miguelita store the bee. If something store the miguelita and the miguelita store the bee then it is bounden. If something is desolate then it store the bee. If something relace the tanya and the tanya bolster the bee then it store the tanya. If the tanya store the miguelita and the miguelita is sarawakian then the miguelita is aplitic. The miguelita relace the bee.", "logic": "\nRelace(tanya, miguelita)\nRelace(tanya, bee)\nAplitic(tanya)\nBolster(tanya, bee)\nStore(tanya, miguelita)\nStore(tanya, bee)\nRelace(miguelita, tanya)\nRelace(miguelita, bee)\nBolster(miguelita, tanya)\nRelace(bee, tanya)\nDesolate(bee)\nBounden(bee)\nBolster(bee, tanya)\nBolster(bee, miguelita)\nStore(bee, tanya)\nStore(bee, miguelita)\nforall x (Desolate(x) and Bolster(x, miguelita) -> Sarawakian(miguelita))\nforall x (Relace(x, tanya) -> Aplitic(tanya))\nforall x (Relace(x, bee) and Bounden(x) -> Relace(x, tanya))\nforall x (Relace(x, tanya) and Bolster(x, miguelita) -> Store(miguelita, bee))\nforall x (Store(x, miguelita) and Store(miguelita, bee) -> Bounden(x))\nforall x (Desolate(x) -> Store(x, bee))\nforall x (Relace(x, tanya) and Bolster(tanya, bee) -> Store(x, tanya))\nStore(tanya, miguelita) and Sarawakian(miguelita) -> Aplitic(miguelita)\n\nRelace(miguelita, bee)\n\ntherefore Relace(miguelita, bee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The marysa allot the thorndike. The marysa allot the rochella. The marysa is anopheline. The marysa rejuvenate the rochella. The marysa beak the thorndike. The marysa beak the rochella. The thorndike allot the marysa. The thorndike allot the rochella. The thorndike rejuvenate the marysa. The rochella allot the marysa. The rochella is prisonlike. The rochella is steadied. The rochella rejuvenate the marysa. The rochella rejuvenate the thorndike. The rochella beak the marysa. The rochella beak the thorndike. If something is prisonlike and it rejuvenate the thorndike then the thorndike is aetiologic. If something allot the marysa then the marysa is anopheline. If something allot the rochella and it is steadied then it allot the marysa. If something allot the marysa and it rejuvenate the thorndike then the thorndike beak the rochella. If something beak the thorndike and the thorndike beak the rochella then it is steadied. If something is prisonlike then it beak the rochella. If something allot the marysa and the marysa rejuvenate the rochella then it beak the marysa. If the marysa beak the thorndike and the thorndike is aetiologic then the thorndike is anopheline. The rochella does not need the marysa.", "logic": "\nAllot(marysa, thorndike)\nAllot(marysa, rochella)\nAnopheline(marysa)\nRejuvenate(marysa, rochella)\nBeak(marysa, thorndike)\nBeak(marysa, rochella)\nAllot(thorndike, marysa)\nAllot(thorndike, rochella)\nRejuvenate(thorndike, marysa)\nAllot(rochella, marysa)\nPrisonlike(rochella)\nSteadied(rochella)\nRejuvenate(rochella, marysa)\nRejuvenate(rochella, thorndike)\nBeak(rochella, marysa)\nBeak(rochella, thorndike)\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) and Rejuvenate(x, thorndike) -> Aetiologic(thorndike))\nforall x (Allot(x, marysa) -> Anopheline(marysa))\nforall x (Allot(x, rochella) and Steadied(x) -> Allot(x, marysa))\nforall x (Allot(x, marysa) and Rejuvenate(x, thorndike) -> Beak(thorndike, rochella))\nforall x (Beak(x, thorndike) and Beak(thorndike, rochella) -> Steadied(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Beak(x, rochella))\nforall x (Allot(x, marysa) and Rejuvenate(marysa, rochella) -> Beak(x, marysa))\nBeak(marysa, thorndike) and Aetiologic(thorndike) -> Anopheline(thorndike)\n\nnot Beak(rochella, marysa)\n\ntherefore Beak(rochella, marysa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The gabey itinerate the harmon. The gabey itinerate the arlyne. The gabey is crimson. The gabey excoriate the arlyne. The gabey emplane the harmon. The gabey emplane the arlyne. The harmon itinerate the gabey. The harmon itinerate the arlyne. The harmon excoriate the gabey. The arlyne itinerate the gabey. The arlyne is crazed. The arlyne is hurrying. The arlyne excoriate the gabey. The arlyne excoriate the harmon. The arlyne emplane the gabey. The arlyne emplane the harmon. If something is crazed and it excoriate the harmon then the harmon is overturned. If something itinerate the gabey then the gabey is crimson. If something itinerate the arlyne and it is hurrying then it itinerate the gabey. If something itinerate the gabey and it excoriate the harmon then the harmon emplane the arlyne. If something emplane the harmon and the harmon emplane the arlyne then it is hurrying. If something is crazed then it emplane the arlyne. If something itinerate the gabey and the gabey excoriate the arlyne then it emplane the gabey. If the gabey emplane the harmon and the harmon is overturned then the harmon is crimson. The harmon emplane the arlyne.", "logic": "\nItinerate(gabey, harmon)\nItinerate(gabey, arlyne)\nCrimson(gabey)\nExcoriate(gabey, arlyne)\nEmplane(gabey, harmon)\nEmplane(gabey, arlyne)\nItinerate(harmon, gabey)\nItinerate(harmon, arlyne)\nExcoriate(harmon, gabey)\nItinerate(arlyne, gabey)\nCrazed(arlyne)\nHurrying(arlyne)\nExcoriate(arlyne, gabey)\nExcoriate(arlyne, harmon)\nEmplane(arlyne, gabey)\nEmplane(arlyne, harmon)\nforall x (Crazed(x) and Excoriate(x, harmon) -> Overturned(harmon))\nforall x (Itinerate(x, gabey) -> Crimson(gabey))\nforall x (Itinerate(x, arlyne) and Hurrying(x) -> Itinerate(x, gabey))\nforall x (Itinerate(x, gabey) and Excoriate(x, harmon) -> Emplane(harmon, arlyne))\nforall x (Emplane(x, harmon) and Emplane(harmon, arlyne) -> Hurrying(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Emplane(x, arlyne))\nforall x (Itinerate(x, gabey) and Excoriate(gabey, arlyne) -> Emplane(x, gabey))\nEmplane(gabey, harmon) and Overturned(harmon) -> Crimson(harmon)\n\nEmplane(harmon, arlyne)\n\nItinerate(arlyne, gabey) and Excoriate(arlyne, harmon) and forall x (Itinerate(x, gabey) and Excoriate(x, harmon) -> Emplane(harmon, arlyne)) -> therefore Emplane(harmon, arlyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The fionna wholesale the roosevelt. The fionna wholesale the verena. The fionna is saved. The fionna gallop the verena. The fionna fill the roosevelt. The fionna fill the verena. The roosevelt wholesale the fionna. The roosevelt wholesale the verena. The roosevelt gallop the fionna. The verena wholesale the fionna. The verena is necked. The verena is indentured. The verena gallop the fionna. The verena gallop the roosevelt. The verena fill the fionna. The verena fill the roosevelt. If something is necked and it gallop the roosevelt then the roosevelt is lobar. If something wholesale the fionna then the fionna is saved. If something wholesale the verena and it is indentured then it wholesale the fionna. If something wholesale the fionna and it gallop the roosevelt then the roosevelt fill the verena. If something fill the roosevelt and the roosevelt fill the verena then it is indentured. If something is necked then it fill the verena. If something wholesale the fionna and the fionna gallop the verena then it fill the fionna. If the fionna fill the roosevelt and the roosevelt is lobar then the roosevelt is saved. The roosevelt does not need the verena.", "logic": "\nWholesale(fionna, roosevelt)\nWholesale(fionna, verena)\nSaved(fionna)\nGallop(fionna, verena)\nFill(fionna, roosevelt)\nFill(fionna, verena)\nWholesale(roosevelt, fionna)\nWholesale(roosevelt, verena)\nGallop(roosevelt, fionna)\nWholesale(verena, fionna)\nNecked(verena)\nIndentured(verena)\nGallop(verena, fionna)\nGallop(verena, roosevelt)\nFill(verena, fionna)\nFill(verena, roosevelt)\nforall x (Necked(x) and Gallop(x, roosevelt) -> Lobar(roosevelt))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, fionna) -> Saved(fionna))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, verena) and Indentured(x) -> Wholesale(x, fionna))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, fionna) and Gallop(x, roosevelt) -> Fill(roosevelt, verena))\nforall x (Fill(x, roosevelt) and Fill(roosevelt, verena) -> Indentured(x))\nforall x (Necked(x) -> Fill(x, verena))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, fionna) and Gallop(fionna, verena) -> Fill(x, fionna))\nFill(fionna, roosevelt) and Lobar(roosevelt) -> Saved(roosevelt)\n\nnot Fill(roosevelt, verena)\n\nWholesale(verena, fionna) and Gallop(verena, roosevelt) and forall x (Wholesale(x, fionna) and Gallop(x, roosevelt) -> Fill(roosevelt, verena)) -> therefore Fill(roosevelt, verena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The agnese outpoint the charisse. The agnese outpoint the lysandra. The agnese is judaical. The agnese transmit the lysandra. The agnese voice the charisse. The agnese voice the lysandra. The charisse outpoint the agnese. The charisse outpoint the lysandra. The charisse transmit the agnese. The lysandra outpoint the agnese. The lysandra is juvenile. The lysandra is semiannual. The lysandra transmit the agnese. The lysandra transmit the charisse. The lysandra voice the agnese. The lysandra voice the charisse. If something is juvenile and it transmit the charisse then the charisse is lithesome. If something outpoint the agnese then the agnese is judaical. If something outpoint the lysandra and it is semiannual then it outpoint the agnese. If something outpoint the agnese and it transmit the charisse then the charisse voice the lysandra. If something voice the charisse and the charisse voice the lysandra then it is semiannual. If something is juvenile then it voice the lysandra. If something outpoint the agnese and the agnese transmit the lysandra then it voice the agnese. If the agnese voice the charisse and the charisse is lithesome then the charisse is judaical. The charisse is judaical.", "logic": "\nOutpoint(agnese, charisse)\nOutpoint(agnese, lysandra)\nJudaical(agnese)\nTransmit(agnese, lysandra)\nVoice(agnese, charisse)\nVoice(agnese, lysandra)\nOutpoint(charisse, agnese)\nOutpoint(charisse, lysandra)\nTransmit(charisse, agnese)\nOutpoint(lysandra, agnese)\nJuvenile(lysandra)\nSemiannual(lysandra)\nTransmit(lysandra, agnese)\nTransmit(lysandra, charisse)\nVoice(lysandra, agnese)\nVoice(lysandra, charisse)\nforall x (Juvenile(x) and Transmit(x, charisse) -> Lithesome(charisse))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, agnese) -> Judaical(agnese))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, lysandra) and Semiannual(x) -> Outpoint(x, agnese))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, agnese) and Transmit(x, charisse) -> Voice(charisse, lysandra))\nforall x (Voice(x, charisse) and Voice(charisse, lysandra) -> Semiannual(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) -> Voice(x, lysandra))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, agnese) and Transmit(agnese, lysandra) -> Voice(x, agnese))\nVoice(agnese, charisse) and Lithesome(charisse) -> Judaical(charisse)\n\nJudaical(charisse)\n\nJuvenile(lysandra) and Transmit(lysandra, charisse) and forall x (Juvenile(x) and Transmit(x, charisse) -> Lithesome(charisse)) -> therefore Lithesome(charisse) Voice(agnese, charisse) and Lithesome(charisse) and Voice(agnese, charisse) and Lithesome(charisse) -> Judaical(charisse) -> therefore Judaical(charisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The xenos mature the hyacinth. The xenos mature the hilliary. The xenos is ordered. The xenos affirm the hilliary. The xenos mingle the hyacinth. The xenos mingle the hilliary. The hyacinth mature the xenos. The hyacinth mature the hilliary. The hyacinth affirm the xenos. The hilliary mature the xenos. The hilliary is nicaean. The hilliary is esophageal. The hilliary affirm the xenos. The hilliary affirm the hyacinth. The hilliary mingle the xenos. The hilliary mingle the hyacinth. If something is nicaean and it affirm the hyacinth then the hyacinth is rowdy. If something mature the xenos then the xenos is ordered. If something mature the hilliary and it is esophageal then it mature the xenos. If something mature the xenos and it affirm the hyacinth then the hyacinth mingle the hilliary. If something mingle the hyacinth and the hyacinth mingle the hilliary then it is esophageal. If something is nicaean then it mingle the hilliary. If something mature the xenos and the xenos affirm the hilliary then it mingle the xenos. If the xenos mingle the hyacinth and the hyacinth is rowdy then the hyacinth is ordered. The hyacinth is not ordered.", "logic": "\nMature(xenos, hyacinth)\nMature(xenos, hilliary)\nOrdered(xenos)\nAffirm(xenos, hilliary)\nMingle(xenos, hyacinth)\nMingle(xenos, hilliary)\nMature(hyacinth, xenos)\nMature(hyacinth, hilliary)\nAffirm(hyacinth, xenos)\nMature(hilliary, xenos)\nNicaean(hilliary)\nEsophageal(hilliary)\nAffirm(hilliary, xenos)\nAffirm(hilliary, hyacinth)\nMingle(hilliary, xenos)\nMingle(hilliary, hyacinth)\nforall x (Nicaean(x) and Affirm(x, hyacinth) -> Rowdy(hyacinth))\nforall x (Mature(x, xenos) -> Ordered(xenos))\nforall x (Mature(x, hilliary) and Esophageal(x) -> Mature(x, xenos))\nforall x (Mature(x, xenos) and Affirm(x, hyacinth) -> Mingle(hyacinth, hilliary))\nforall x (Mingle(x, hyacinth) and Mingle(hyacinth, hilliary) -> Esophageal(x))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) -> Mingle(x, hilliary))\nforall x (Mature(x, xenos) and Affirm(xenos, hilliary) -> Mingle(x, xenos))\nMingle(xenos, hyacinth) and Rowdy(hyacinth) -> Ordered(hyacinth)\n\nnot Ordered(hyacinth)\n\nNicaean(hilliary) and Affirm(hilliary, hyacinth) and forall x (Nicaean(x) and Affirm(x, hyacinth) -> Rowdy(hyacinth)) -> therefore Rowdy(hyacinth) Mingle(xenos, hyacinth) and Rowdy(hyacinth) and Mingle(xenos, hyacinth) and Rowdy(hyacinth) -> Ordered(hyacinth) -> therefore Ordered(hyacinth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The billie uncloak the engelbert. The billie uncloak the brandon. The billie is himalayan. The billie temper the brandon. The billie slate the engelbert. The billie slate the brandon. The engelbert uncloak the billie. The engelbert uncloak the brandon. The engelbert temper the billie. The brandon uncloak the billie. The brandon is fearless. The brandon is foreboding. The brandon temper the billie. The brandon temper the engelbert. The brandon slate the billie. The brandon slate the engelbert. If something is fearless and it temper the engelbert then the engelbert is fledgeling. If something uncloak the billie then the billie is himalayan. If something uncloak the brandon and it is foreboding then it uncloak the billie. If something uncloak the billie and it temper the engelbert then the engelbert slate the brandon. If something slate the engelbert and the engelbert slate the brandon then it is foreboding. If something is fearless then it slate the brandon. If something uncloak the billie and the billie temper the brandon then it slate the billie. If the billie slate the engelbert and the engelbert is fledgeling then the engelbert is himalayan. The billie uncloak the billie.", "logic": "\nUncloak(billie, engelbert)\nUncloak(billie, brandon)\nHimalayan(billie)\nTemper(billie, brandon)\nSlate(billie, engelbert)\nSlate(billie, brandon)\nUncloak(engelbert, billie)\nUncloak(engelbert, brandon)\nTemper(engelbert, billie)\nUncloak(brandon, billie)\nFearless(brandon)\nForeboding(brandon)\nTemper(brandon, billie)\nTemper(brandon, engelbert)\nSlate(brandon, billie)\nSlate(brandon, engelbert)\nforall x (Fearless(x) and Temper(x, engelbert) -> Fledgeling(engelbert))\nforall x (Uncloak(x, billie) -> Himalayan(billie))\nforall x (Uncloak(x, brandon) and Foreboding(x) -> Uncloak(x, billie))\nforall x (Uncloak(x, billie) and Temper(x, engelbert) -> Slate(engelbert, brandon))\nforall x (Slate(x, engelbert) and Slate(engelbert, brandon) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Fearless(x) -> Slate(x, brandon))\nforall x (Uncloak(x, billie) and Temper(billie, brandon) -> Slate(x, billie))\nSlate(billie, engelbert) and Fledgeling(engelbert) -> Himalayan(engelbert)\n\nUncloak(billie, billie)\n\nUncloak(brandon, billie) and Temper(brandon, engelbert) and forall x (Uncloak(x, billie) and Temper(x, engelbert) -> Slate(engelbert, brandon)) -> therefore Slate(engelbert, brandon) Slate(billie, engelbert) and Slate(engelbert, brandon) and forall x (Slate(x, engelbert) and Slate(engelbert, brandon) -> Foreboding(x)) -> therefore Foreboding(billie) Uncloak(billie, brandon) and Foreboding(billie) and forall x (Uncloak(x, brandon) and Foreboding(x) -> Uncloak(x, billie)) -> therefore Uncloak(billie, billie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The randie revile the deloria. The randie revile the trevar. The randie is inland. The randie long the trevar. The randie bacterize the deloria. The randie bacterize the trevar. The deloria revile the randie. The deloria revile the trevar. The deloria long the randie. The trevar revile the randie. The trevar is bantering. The trevar is hypoactive. The trevar long the randie. The trevar long the deloria. The trevar bacterize the randie. The trevar bacterize the deloria. If something is bantering and it long the deloria then the deloria is bifocal. If something revile the randie then the randie is inland. If something revile the trevar and it is hypoactive then it revile the randie. If something revile the randie and it long the deloria then the deloria bacterize the trevar. If something bacterize the deloria and the deloria bacterize the trevar then it is hypoactive. If something is bantering then it bacterize the trevar. If something revile the randie and the randie long the trevar then it bacterize the randie. If the randie bacterize the deloria and the deloria is bifocal then the deloria is inland. The randie does not chase the randie.", "logic": "\nRevile(randie, deloria)\nRevile(randie, trevar)\nInland(randie)\nLong(randie, trevar)\nBacterize(randie, deloria)\nBacterize(randie, trevar)\nRevile(deloria, randie)\nRevile(deloria, trevar)\nLong(deloria, randie)\nRevile(trevar, randie)\nBantering(trevar)\nHypoactive(trevar)\nLong(trevar, randie)\nLong(trevar, deloria)\nBacterize(trevar, randie)\nBacterize(trevar, deloria)\nforall x (Bantering(x) and Long(x, deloria) -> Bifocal(deloria))\nforall x (Revile(x, randie) -> Inland(randie))\nforall x (Revile(x, trevar) and Hypoactive(x) -> Revile(x, randie))\nforall x (Revile(x, randie) and Long(x, deloria) -> Bacterize(deloria, trevar))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, deloria) and Bacterize(deloria, trevar) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Bacterize(x, trevar))\nforall x (Revile(x, randie) and Long(randie, trevar) -> Bacterize(x, randie))\nBacterize(randie, deloria) and Bifocal(deloria) -> Inland(deloria)\n\nnot Revile(randie, randie)\n\nRevile(trevar, randie) and Long(trevar, deloria) and forall x (Revile(x, randie) and Long(x, deloria) -> Bacterize(deloria, trevar)) -> therefore Bacterize(deloria, trevar) Bacterize(randie, deloria) and Bacterize(deloria, trevar) and forall x (Bacterize(x, deloria) and Bacterize(deloria, trevar) -> Hypoactive(x)) -> therefore Hypoactive(randie) Revile(randie, trevar) and Hypoactive(randie) and forall x (Revile(x, trevar) and Hypoactive(x) -> Revile(x, randie)) -> therefore Revile(randie, randie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The genevra elbow the jada. The genevra elbow the gwynne. The genevra is calycinal. The genevra canonize the gwynne. The genevra kill the jada. The genevra kill the gwynne. The jada elbow the genevra. The jada elbow the gwynne. The jada canonize the genevra. The gwynne elbow the genevra. The gwynne is xiii. The gwynne is calculous. The gwynne canonize the genevra. The gwynne canonize the jada. The gwynne kill the genevra. The gwynne kill the jada. If something is xiii and it canonize the jada then the jada is nigerien. If something elbow the genevra then the genevra is calycinal. If something elbow the gwynne and it is calculous then it elbow the genevra. If something elbow the genevra and it canonize the jada then the jada kill the gwynne. If something kill the jada and the jada kill the gwynne then it is calculous. If something is xiii then it kill the gwynne. If something elbow the genevra and the genevra canonize the gwynne then it kill the genevra. If the genevra kill the jada and the jada is nigerien then the jada is calycinal. The jada is not calculous.", "logic": "\nElbow(genevra, jada)\nElbow(genevra, gwynne)\nCalycinal(genevra)\nCanonize(genevra, gwynne)\nKill(genevra, jada)\nKill(genevra, gwynne)\nElbow(jada, genevra)\nElbow(jada, gwynne)\nCanonize(jada, genevra)\nElbow(gwynne, genevra)\nXiii(gwynne)\nCalculous(gwynne)\nCanonize(gwynne, genevra)\nCanonize(gwynne, jada)\nKill(gwynne, genevra)\nKill(gwynne, jada)\nforall x (Xiii(x) and Canonize(x, jada) -> Nigerien(jada))\nforall x (Elbow(x, genevra) -> Calycinal(genevra))\nforall x (Elbow(x, gwynne) and Calculous(x) -> Elbow(x, genevra))\nforall x (Elbow(x, genevra) and Canonize(x, jada) -> Kill(jada, gwynne))\nforall x (Kill(x, jada) and Kill(jada, gwynne) -> Calculous(x))\nforall x (Xiii(x) -> Kill(x, gwynne))\nforall x (Elbow(x, genevra) and Canonize(genevra, gwynne) -> Kill(x, genevra))\nKill(genevra, jada) and Nigerien(jada) -> Calycinal(jada)\n\nnot Calculous(jada)\n\nforall x (Kill(x, jada) and Kill(jada, gwynne) -> Calculous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The kaleena shark the jaquelin. The kaleena shark the lynnell. The kaleena is affixed. The kaleena syllabise the lynnell. The kaleena bolster the jaquelin. The kaleena bolster the lynnell. The jaquelin shark the kaleena. The jaquelin shark the lynnell. The jaquelin syllabise the kaleena. The lynnell shark the kaleena. The lynnell is nightlong. The lynnell is numerical. The lynnell syllabise the kaleena. The lynnell syllabise the jaquelin. The lynnell bolster the kaleena. The lynnell bolster the jaquelin. If something is nightlong and it syllabise the jaquelin then the jaquelin is bowlegged. If something shark the kaleena then the kaleena is affixed. If something shark the lynnell and it is numerical then it shark the kaleena. If something shark the kaleena and it syllabise the jaquelin then the jaquelin bolster the lynnell. If something bolster the jaquelin and the jaquelin bolster the lynnell then it is numerical. If something is nightlong then it bolster the lynnell. If something shark the kaleena and the kaleena syllabise the lynnell then it bolster the kaleena. If the kaleena bolster the jaquelin and the jaquelin is bowlegged then the jaquelin is affixed. The lynnell syllabise the lynnell.", "logic": "\nShark(kaleena, jaquelin)\nShark(kaleena, lynnell)\nAffixed(kaleena)\nSyllabise(kaleena, lynnell)\nBolster(kaleena, jaquelin)\nBolster(kaleena, lynnell)\nShark(jaquelin, kaleena)\nShark(jaquelin, lynnell)\nSyllabise(jaquelin, kaleena)\nShark(lynnell, kaleena)\nNightlong(lynnell)\nNumerical(lynnell)\nSyllabise(lynnell, kaleena)\nSyllabise(lynnell, jaquelin)\nBolster(lynnell, kaleena)\nBolster(lynnell, jaquelin)\nforall x (Nightlong(x) and Syllabise(x, jaquelin) -> Bowlegged(jaquelin))\nforall x (Shark(x, kaleena) -> Affixed(kaleena))\nforall x (Shark(x, lynnell) and Numerical(x) -> Shark(x, kaleena))\nforall x (Shark(x, kaleena) and Syllabise(x, jaquelin) -> Bolster(jaquelin, lynnell))\nforall x (Bolster(x, jaquelin) and Bolster(jaquelin, lynnell) -> Numerical(x))\nforall x (Nightlong(x) -> Bolster(x, lynnell))\nforall x (Shark(x, kaleena) and Syllabise(kaleena, lynnell) -> Bolster(x, kaleena))\nBolster(kaleena, jaquelin) and Bowlegged(jaquelin) -> Affixed(jaquelin)\n\nSyllabise(lynnell, lynnell)\n\nSyllabise(lynnell, lynnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The morgana bastardize the jeffie. The morgana bastardize the janina. The morgana is acanthous. The morgana export the janina. The morgana climax the jeffie. The morgana climax the janina. The jeffie bastardize the morgana. The jeffie bastardize the janina. The jeffie export the morgana. The janina bastardize the morgana. The janina is eurasian. The janina is polysemous. The janina export the morgana. The janina export the jeffie. The janina climax the morgana. The janina climax the jeffie. If something is eurasian and it export the jeffie then the jeffie is puranic. If something bastardize the morgana then the morgana is acanthous. If something bastardize the janina and it is polysemous then it bastardize the morgana. If something bastardize the morgana and it export the jeffie then the jeffie climax the janina. If something climax the jeffie and the jeffie climax the janina then it is polysemous. If something is eurasian then it climax the janina. If something bastardize the morgana and the morgana export the janina then it climax the morgana. If the morgana climax the jeffie and the jeffie is puranic then the jeffie is acanthous. The jeffie does not need the jeffie.", "logic": "\nBastardize(morgana, jeffie)\nBastardize(morgana, janina)\nAcanthous(morgana)\nExport(morgana, janina)\nClimax(morgana, jeffie)\nClimax(morgana, janina)\nBastardize(jeffie, morgana)\nBastardize(jeffie, janina)\nExport(jeffie, morgana)\nBastardize(janina, morgana)\nEurasian(janina)\nPolysemous(janina)\nExport(janina, morgana)\nExport(janina, jeffie)\nClimax(janina, morgana)\nClimax(janina, jeffie)\nforall x (Eurasian(x) and Export(x, jeffie) -> Puranic(jeffie))\nforall x (Bastardize(x, morgana) -> Acanthous(morgana))\nforall x (Bastardize(x, janina) and Polysemous(x) -> Bastardize(x, morgana))\nforall x (Bastardize(x, morgana) and Export(x, jeffie) -> Climax(jeffie, janina))\nforall x (Climax(x, jeffie) and Climax(jeffie, janina) -> Polysemous(x))\nforall x (Eurasian(x) -> Climax(x, janina))\nforall x (Bastardize(x, morgana) and Export(morgana, janina) -> Climax(x, morgana))\nClimax(morgana, jeffie) and Puranic(jeffie) -> Acanthous(jeffie)\n\nnot Climax(jeffie, jeffie)\n\nnot Climax(jeffie, jeffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The cookie strickle the lana. The cookie strickle the fara. The cookie is burked. The cookie bestride the fara. The cookie brand the lana. The cookie brand the fara. The lana strickle the cookie. The lana strickle the fara. The lana bestride the cookie. The fara strickle the cookie. The fara is citified. The fara is brushed. The fara bestride the cookie. The fara bestride the lana. The fara brand the cookie. The fara brand the lana. If something is citified and it bestride the lana then the lana is uproarious. If something strickle the cookie then the cookie is burked. If something strickle the fara and it is brushed then it strickle the cookie. If something strickle the cookie and it bestride the lana then the lana brand the fara. If something brand the lana and the lana brand the fara then it is brushed. If something is citified then it brand the fara. If something strickle the cookie and the cookie bestride the fara then it brand the cookie. If the cookie brand the lana and the lana is uproarious then the lana is burked. The cookie bestride the cookie.", "logic": "\nStrickle(cookie, lana)\nStrickle(cookie, fara)\nBurked(cookie)\nBestride(cookie, fara)\nBrand(cookie, lana)\nBrand(cookie, fara)\nStrickle(lana, cookie)\nStrickle(lana, fara)\nBestride(lana, cookie)\nStrickle(fara, cookie)\nCitified(fara)\nBrushed(fara)\nBestride(fara, cookie)\nBestride(fara, lana)\nBrand(fara, cookie)\nBrand(fara, lana)\nforall x (Citified(x) and Bestride(x, lana) -> Uproarious(lana))\nforall x (Strickle(x, cookie) -> Burked(cookie))\nforall x (Strickle(x, fara) and Brushed(x) -> Strickle(x, cookie))\nforall x (Strickle(x, cookie) and Bestride(x, lana) -> Brand(lana, fara))\nforall x (Brand(x, lana) and Brand(lana, fara) -> Brushed(x))\nforall x (Citified(x) -> Brand(x, fara))\nforall x (Strickle(x, cookie) and Bestride(cookie, fara) -> Brand(x, cookie))\nBrand(cookie, lana) and Uproarious(lana) -> Burked(lana)\n\nBestride(cookie, cookie)\n\nBestride(cookie, cookie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The alayne coggle the carter. The alayne coggle the aldo. The alayne is delineate. The alayne reallocate the aldo. The alayne maraud the carter. The alayne maraud the aldo. The carter coggle the alayne. The carter coggle the aldo. The carter reallocate the alayne. The aldo coggle the alayne. The aldo is humpbacked. The aldo is hellish. The aldo reallocate the alayne. The aldo reallocate the carter. The aldo maraud the alayne. The aldo maraud the carter. If something is humpbacked and it reallocate the carter then the carter is distraught. If something coggle the alayne then the alayne is delineate. If something coggle the aldo and it is hellish then it coggle the alayne. If something coggle the alayne and it reallocate the carter then the carter maraud the aldo. If something maraud the carter and the carter maraud the aldo then it is hellish. If something is humpbacked then it maraud the aldo. If something coggle the alayne and the alayne reallocate the aldo then it maraud the alayne. If the alayne maraud the carter and the carter is distraught then the carter is delineate. The aldo does not chase the aldo.", "logic": "\nCoggle(alayne, carter)\nCoggle(alayne, aldo)\nDelineate(alayne)\nReallocate(alayne, aldo)\nMaraud(alayne, carter)\nMaraud(alayne, aldo)\nCoggle(carter, alayne)\nCoggle(carter, aldo)\nReallocate(carter, alayne)\nCoggle(aldo, alayne)\nHumpbacked(aldo)\nHellish(aldo)\nReallocate(aldo, alayne)\nReallocate(aldo, carter)\nMaraud(aldo, alayne)\nMaraud(aldo, carter)\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) and Reallocate(x, carter) -> Distraught(carter))\nforall x (Coggle(x, alayne) -> Delineate(alayne))\nforall x (Coggle(x, aldo) and Hellish(x) -> Coggle(x, alayne))\nforall x (Coggle(x, alayne) and Reallocate(x, carter) -> Maraud(carter, aldo))\nforall x (Maraud(x, carter) and Maraud(carter, aldo) -> Hellish(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Maraud(x, aldo))\nforall x (Coggle(x, alayne) and Reallocate(alayne, aldo) -> Maraud(x, alayne))\nMaraud(alayne, carter) and Distraught(carter) -> Delineate(carter)\n\nnot Coggle(aldo, aldo)\n\nnot Coggle(aldo, aldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The fallon glom the gwenette. The fallon glom the meier. The fallon is procurable. The fallon foredate the meier. The fallon defer the gwenette. The fallon defer the meier. The gwenette glom the fallon. The gwenette glom the meier. The gwenette foredate the fallon. The meier glom the fallon. The meier is perineal. The meier is outspread. The meier foredate the fallon. The meier foredate the gwenette. The meier defer the fallon. The meier defer the gwenette. If something is perineal and it foredate the gwenette then the gwenette is pensive. If something glom the fallon then the fallon is procurable. If something glom the meier and it is outspread then it glom the fallon. If something glom the fallon and it foredate the gwenette then the gwenette defer the meier. If something defer the gwenette and the gwenette defer the meier then it is outspread. If something is perineal then it defer the meier. If something glom the fallon and the fallon foredate the meier then it defer the fallon. If the fallon defer the gwenette and the gwenette is pensive then the gwenette is procurable. The gwenette is perineal.", "logic": "\nGlom(fallon, gwenette)\nGlom(fallon, meier)\nProcurable(fallon)\nForedate(fallon, meier)\nDefer(fallon, gwenette)\nDefer(fallon, meier)\nGlom(gwenette, fallon)\nGlom(gwenette, meier)\nForedate(gwenette, fallon)\nGlom(meier, fallon)\nPerineal(meier)\nOutspread(meier)\nForedate(meier, fallon)\nForedate(meier, gwenette)\nDefer(meier, fallon)\nDefer(meier, gwenette)\nforall x (Perineal(x) and Foredate(x, gwenette) -> Pensive(gwenette))\nforall x (Glom(x, fallon) -> Procurable(fallon))\nforall x (Glom(x, meier) and Outspread(x) -> Glom(x, fallon))\nforall x (Glom(x, fallon) and Foredate(x, gwenette) -> Defer(gwenette, meier))\nforall x (Defer(x, gwenette) and Defer(gwenette, meier) -> Outspread(x))\nforall x (Perineal(x) -> Defer(x, meier))\nforall x (Glom(x, fallon) and Foredate(fallon, meier) -> Defer(x, fallon))\nDefer(fallon, gwenette) and Pensive(gwenette) -> Procurable(gwenette)\n\nPerineal(gwenette)\n\nPerineal(gwenette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The correy outsmart the angelia. The correy outsmart the frederica. The correy is plutonian. The correy causeway the frederica. The correy secularize the angelia. The correy secularize the frederica. The angelia outsmart the correy. The angelia outsmart the frederica. The angelia causeway the correy. The frederica outsmart the correy. The frederica is limber. The frederica is homing. The frederica causeway the correy. The frederica causeway the angelia. The frederica secularize the correy. The frederica secularize the angelia. If something is limber and it causeway the angelia then the angelia is breeding. If something outsmart the correy then the correy is plutonian. If something outsmart the frederica and it is homing then it outsmart the correy. If something outsmart the correy and it causeway the angelia then the angelia secularize the frederica. If something secularize the angelia and the angelia secularize the frederica then it is homing. If something is limber then it secularize the frederica. If something outsmart the correy and the correy causeway the frederica then it secularize the correy. If the correy secularize the angelia and the angelia is breeding then the angelia is plutonian. The angelia is not red.", "logic": "\nOutsmart(correy, angelia)\nOutsmart(correy, frederica)\nPlutonian(correy)\nCauseway(correy, frederica)\nSecularize(correy, angelia)\nSecularize(correy, frederica)\nOutsmart(angelia, correy)\nOutsmart(angelia, frederica)\nCauseway(angelia, correy)\nOutsmart(frederica, correy)\nLimber(frederica)\nHoming(frederica)\nCauseway(frederica, correy)\nCauseway(frederica, angelia)\nSecularize(frederica, correy)\nSecularize(frederica, angelia)\nforall x (Limber(x) and Causeway(x, angelia) -> Breeding(angelia))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, correy) -> Plutonian(correy))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, frederica) and Homing(x) -> Outsmart(x, correy))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, correy) and Causeway(x, angelia) -> Secularize(angelia, frederica))\nforall x (Secularize(x, angelia) and Secularize(angelia, frederica) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Limber(x) -> Secularize(x, frederica))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, correy) and Causeway(correy, frederica) -> Secularize(x, correy))\nSecularize(correy, angelia) and Breeding(angelia) -> Plutonian(angelia)\n\nnot Red(angelia)\n\nnot Red(angelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The deloria compete the herrick. The deloria compete the verla. The deloria is arborical. The deloria char the verla. The deloria tolerate the herrick. The deloria tolerate the verla. The herrick compete the deloria. The herrick compete the verla. The herrick char the deloria. The verla compete the deloria. The verla is spattered. The verla is stormproof. The verla char the deloria. The verla char the herrick. The verla tolerate the deloria. The verla tolerate the herrick. If something is spattered and it char the herrick then the herrick is clerical. If something compete the deloria then the deloria is arborical. If something compete the verla and it is stormproof then it compete the deloria. If something compete the deloria and it char the herrick then the herrick tolerate the verla. If something tolerate the herrick and the herrick tolerate the verla then it is stormproof. If something is spattered then it tolerate the verla. If something compete the deloria and the deloria char the verla then it tolerate the deloria. If the deloria tolerate the herrick and the herrick is clerical then the herrick is arborical. The deloria char the herrick.", "logic": "\nCompete(deloria, herrick)\nCompete(deloria, verla)\nArborical(deloria)\nChar(deloria, verla)\nTolerate(deloria, herrick)\nTolerate(deloria, verla)\nCompete(herrick, deloria)\nCompete(herrick, verla)\nChar(herrick, deloria)\nCompete(verla, deloria)\nSpattered(verla)\nStormproof(verla)\nChar(verla, deloria)\nChar(verla, herrick)\nTolerate(verla, deloria)\nTolerate(verla, herrick)\nforall x (Spattered(x) and Char(x, herrick) -> Clerical(herrick))\nforall x (Compete(x, deloria) -> Arborical(deloria))\nforall x (Compete(x, verla) and Stormproof(x) -> Compete(x, deloria))\nforall x (Compete(x, deloria) and Char(x, herrick) -> Tolerate(herrick, verla))\nforall x (Tolerate(x, herrick) and Tolerate(herrick, verla) -> Stormproof(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) -> Tolerate(x, verla))\nforall x (Compete(x, deloria) and Char(deloria, verla) -> Tolerate(x, deloria))\nTolerate(deloria, herrick) and Clerical(herrick) -> Arborical(herrick)\n\nChar(deloria, herrick)\n\nChar(deloria, herrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The malvina splinter the marilee. The malvina mechanize the marilee. The kacy befog the malvina. The karlyn is xxxv. The marilee befog the karlyn. The marilee splinter the malvina. The marilee mechanize the karlyn. If someone mechanize the malvina then they are vestiary. If someone befog the malvina then they visit the karlyn. If someone mechanize the karlyn and they visit the marilee then they need the karlyn. If someone is vestiary then they chase the kacy. All vocative, indian people are vestiary. If someone befog the karlyn and they are unobvious then they are xxxv. If someone befog the malvina and they visit the karlyn then the karlyn mechanize the malvina. If someone is xxxv then they chase the marilee. The karlyn is xxxv.", "logic": "\nSplinter(malvina, marilee)\nMechanize(malvina, marilee)\nBefog(kacy, malvina)\nXxxv(karlyn)\nBefog(marilee, karlyn)\nSplinter(marilee, malvina)\nMechanize(marilee, karlyn)\nforall x (Mechanize(x, malvina) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Befog(x, malvina) -> Mechanize(x, karlyn))\nforall x (Mechanize(x, karlyn) and Mechanize(x, marilee) -> Splinter(x, karlyn))\nforall x (Vestiary(x) -> Befog(x, kacy))\nforall x (Vocative(x) and Indian(x) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Befog(x, karlyn) and Unobvious(x) -> Xxxv(x))\nforall x (Befog(x, malvina) and Mechanize(x, karlyn) -> Mechanize(karlyn, malvina))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) -> Befog(x, marilee))\n\nXxxv(karlyn)\n\ntherefore Xxxv(karlyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The simon cant the thor. The simon seal the thor. The hetti christen the simon. The eloise is culinary. The thor christen the eloise. The thor cant the simon. The thor seal the eloise. If someone seal the simon then they are unrentable. If someone christen the simon then they visit the eloise. If someone seal the eloise and they visit the thor then they need the eloise. If someone is unrentable then they chase the hetti. All shimmery, inner people are unrentable. If someone christen the eloise and they are surreal then they are culinary. If someone christen the simon and they visit the eloise then the eloise seal the simon. If someone is culinary then they chase the thor. The eloise is not culinary.", "logic": "\nCant(simon, thor)\nSeal(simon, thor)\nChristen(hetti, simon)\nCulinary(eloise)\nChristen(thor, eloise)\nCant(thor, simon)\nSeal(thor, eloise)\nforall x (Seal(x, simon) -> Unrentable(x))\nforall x (Christen(x, simon) -> Seal(x, eloise))\nforall x (Seal(x, eloise) and Seal(x, thor) -> Cant(x, eloise))\nforall x (Unrentable(x) -> Christen(x, hetti))\nforall x (Shimmery(x) and Inner(x) -> Unrentable(x))\nforall x (Christen(x, eloise) and Surreal(x) -> Culinary(x))\nforall x (Christen(x, simon) and Seal(x, eloise) -> Seal(eloise, simon))\nforall x (Culinary(x) -> Christen(x, thor))\n\nnot Culinary(eloise)\n\ntherefore Culinary(eloise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The davine personify the benedicta. The davine unsex the benedicta. The delinda frisk the davine. The klarika is affiliated. The benedicta frisk the klarika. The benedicta personify the davine. The benedicta unsex the klarika. If someone unsex the davine then they are xanthous. If someone frisk the davine then they visit the klarika. If someone unsex the klarika and they visit the benedicta then they need the klarika. If someone is xanthous then they chase the delinda. All slaked, conventual people are xanthous. If someone frisk the klarika and they are unenviable then they are affiliated. If someone frisk the davine and they visit the klarika then the klarika unsex the davine. If someone is affiliated then they chase the benedicta. The klarika frisk the benedicta.", "logic": "\nPersonify(davine, benedicta)\nUnsex(davine, benedicta)\nFrisk(delinda, davine)\nAffiliated(klarika)\nFrisk(benedicta, klarika)\nPersonify(benedicta, davine)\nUnsex(benedicta, klarika)\nforall x (Unsex(x, davine) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Frisk(x, davine) -> Unsex(x, klarika))\nforall x (Unsex(x, klarika) and Unsex(x, benedicta) -> Personify(x, klarika))\nforall x (Xanthous(x) -> Frisk(x, delinda))\nforall x (Slaked(x) and Conventual(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Frisk(x, klarika) and Unenviable(x) -> Affiliated(x))\nforall x (Frisk(x, davine) and Unsex(x, klarika) -> Unsex(klarika, davine))\nforall x (Affiliated(x) -> Frisk(x, benedicta))\n\nFrisk(klarika, benedicta)\n\nAffiliated(klarika) and forall x (Affiliated(x) -> Frisk(x, benedicta)) -> therefore Frisk(klarika, benedicta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The rana doubt the marti. The rana conform the marti. The gifford assert the rana. The courtney is christian. The marti assert the courtney. The marti doubt the rana. The marti conform the courtney. If someone conform the rana then they are admittible. If someone assert the rana then they visit the courtney. If someone conform the courtney and they visit the marti then they need the courtney. If someone is admittible then they chase the gifford. All hesperian, ephesian people are admittible. If someone assert the courtney and they are rallying then they are christian. If someone assert the rana and they visit the courtney then the courtney conform the rana. If someone is christian then they chase the marti. The courtney does not chase the marti.", "logic": "\nDoubt(rana, marti)\nConform(rana, marti)\nAssert(gifford, rana)\nChristian(courtney)\nAssert(marti, courtney)\nDoubt(marti, rana)\nConform(marti, courtney)\nforall x (Conform(x, rana) -> Admittible(x))\nforall x (Assert(x, rana) -> Conform(x, courtney))\nforall x (Conform(x, courtney) and Conform(x, marti) -> Doubt(x, courtney))\nforall x (Admittible(x) -> Assert(x, gifford))\nforall x (Hesperian(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Admittible(x))\nforall x (Assert(x, courtney) and Rallying(x) -> Christian(x))\nforall x (Assert(x, rana) and Conform(x, courtney) -> Conform(courtney, rana))\nforall x (Christian(x) -> Assert(x, marti))\n\nnot Assert(courtney, marti)\n\nChristian(courtney) and forall x (Christian(x) -> Assert(x, marti)) -> therefore Assert(courtney, marti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The desiri coddle the hallie. The desiri post the hallie. The hercule budge the desiri. The laureen is unemphatic. The hallie budge the laureen. The hallie coddle the desiri. The hallie post the laureen. If someone post the desiri then they are furrowed. If someone budge the desiri then they visit the laureen. If someone post the laureen and they visit the hallie then they need the laureen. If someone is furrowed then they chase the hercule. All vitrified, negroid people are furrowed. If someone budge the laureen and they are feminine then they are unemphatic. If someone budge the desiri and they visit the laureen then the laureen post the desiri. If someone is unemphatic then they chase the hallie. The laureen post the desiri.", "logic": "\nCoddle(desiri, hallie)\nPost(desiri, hallie)\nBudge(hercule, desiri)\nUnemphatic(laureen)\nBudge(hallie, laureen)\nCoddle(hallie, desiri)\nPost(hallie, laureen)\nforall x (Post(x, desiri) -> Furrowed(x))\nforall x (Budge(x, desiri) -> Post(x, laureen))\nforall x (Post(x, laureen) and Post(x, hallie) -> Coddle(x, laureen))\nforall x (Furrowed(x) -> Budge(x, hercule))\nforall x (Vitrified(x) and Negroid(x) -> Furrowed(x))\nforall x (Budge(x, laureen) and Feminine(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Budge(x, desiri) and Post(x, laureen) -> Post(laureen, desiri))\nforall x (Unemphatic(x) -> Budge(x, hallie))\n\nPost(laureen, desiri)\n\nBudge(hercule, desiri) and forall x (Budge(x, desiri) -> Post(x, laureen)) -> therefore Post(hercule, laureen) Budge(hercule, desiri) and Post(hercule, laureen) and forall x (Budge(x, desiri) and Post(x, laureen) -> Post(laureen, desiri)) -> therefore Post(laureen, desiri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The jacquie accouter the wilone. The jacquie foil the wilone. The benjamen purpose the jacquie. The ainslee is randomized. The wilone purpose the ainslee. The wilone accouter the jacquie. The wilone foil the ainslee. If someone foil the jacquie then they are commercial. If someone purpose the jacquie then they visit the ainslee. If someone foil the ainslee and they visit the wilone then they need the ainslee. If someone is commercial then they chase the benjamen. All wrinkly, diarrheic people are commercial. If someone purpose the ainslee and they are ungathered then they are randomized. If someone purpose the jacquie and they visit the ainslee then the ainslee foil the jacquie. If someone is randomized then they chase the wilone. The ainslee does not visit the jacquie.", "logic": "\nAccouter(jacquie, wilone)\nFoil(jacquie, wilone)\nPurpose(benjamen, jacquie)\nRandomized(ainslee)\nPurpose(wilone, ainslee)\nAccouter(wilone, jacquie)\nFoil(wilone, ainslee)\nforall x (Foil(x, jacquie) -> Commercial(x))\nforall x (Purpose(x, jacquie) -> Foil(x, ainslee))\nforall x (Foil(x, ainslee) and Foil(x, wilone) -> Accouter(x, ainslee))\nforall x (Commercial(x) -> Purpose(x, benjamen))\nforall x (Wrinkly(x) and Diarrheic(x) -> Commercial(x))\nforall x (Purpose(x, ainslee) and Ungathered(x) -> Randomized(x))\nforall x (Purpose(x, jacquie) and Foil(x, ainslee) -> Foil(ainslee, jacquie))\nforall x (Randomized(x) -> Purpose(x, wilone))\n\nnot Foil(ainslee, jacquie)\n\nPurpose(benjamen, jacquie) and forall x (Purpose(x, jacquie) -> Foil(x, ainslee)) -> therefore Foil(benjamen, ainslee) Purpose(benjamen, jacquie) and Foil(benjamen, ainslee) and forall x (Purpose(x, jacquie) and Foil(x, ainslee) -> Foil(ainslee, jacquie)) -> therefore Foil(ainslee, jacquie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The melany birdie the sussi. The melany dillydally the sussi. The marcy disforest the melany. The coraline is reclusive. The sussi disforest the coraline. The sussi birdie the melany. The sussi dillydally the coraline. If someone dillydally the melany then they are scorbutic. If someone disforest the melany then they visit the coraline. If someone dillydally the coraline and they visit the sussi then they need the coraline. If someone is scorbutic then they chase the marcy. All accidental, pyramidic people are scorbutic. If someone disforest the coraline and they are mere then they are reclusive. If someone disforest the melany and they visit the coraline then the coraline dillydally the melany. If someone is reclusive then they chase the sussi. The coraline is scorbutic.", "logic": "\nBirdie(melany, sussi)\nDillydally(melany, sussi)\nDisforest(marcy, melany)\nReclusive(coraline)\nDisforest(sussi, coraline)\nBirdie(sussi, melany)\nDillydally(sussi, coraline)\nforall x (Dillydally(x, melany) -> Scorbutic(x))\nforall x (Disforest(x, melany) -> Dillydally(x, coraline))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, coraline) and Dillydally(x, sussi) -> Birdie(x, coraline))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) -> Disforest(x, marcy))\nforall x (Accidental(x) and Pyramidic(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\nforall x (Disforest(x, coraline) and Mere(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nforall x (Disforest(x, melany) and Dillydally(x, coraline) -> Dillydally(coraline, melany))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Disforest(x, sussi))\n\nScorbutic(coraline)\n\nDisforest(marcy, melany) and forall x (Disforest(x, melany) -> Dillydally(x, coraline)) -> therefore Dillydally(marcy, coraline) Disforest(marcy, melany) and Dillydally(marcy, coraline) and forall x (Disforest(x, melany) and Dillydally(x, coraline) -> Dillydally(coraline, melany)) -> therefore Dillydally(coraline, melany) Dillydally(coraline, melany) and forall x (Dillydally(x, melany) -> Scorbutic(x)) -> therefore Scorbutic(coraline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The meara exit the matthiew. The meara rearrange the matthiew. The dannie course the meara. The vonnie is inward. The matthiew course the vonnie. The matthiew exit the meara. The matthiew rearrange the vonnie. If someone rearrange the meara then they are magnetised. If someone course the meara then they visit the vonnie. If someone rearrange the vonnie and they visit the matthiew then they need the vonnie. If someone is magnetised then they chase the dannie. All maladroit, twelfth people are magnetised. If someone course the vonnie and they are adscripted then they are inward. If someone course the meara and they visit the vonnie then the vonnie rearrange the meara. If someone is inward then they chase the matthiew. The vonnie is not magnetised.", "logic": "\nExit(meara, matthiew)\nRearrange(meara, matthiew)\nCourse(dannie, meara)\nInward(vonnie)\nCourse(matthiew, vonnie)\nExit(matthiew, meara)\nRearrange(matthiew, vonnie)\nforall x (Rearrange(x, meara) -> Magnetised(x))\nforall x (Course(x, meara) -> Rearrange(x, vonnie))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, vonnie) and Rearrange(x, matthiew) -> Exit(x, vonnie))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) -> Course(x, dannie))\nforall x (Maladroit(x) and Twelfth(x) -> Magnetised(x))\nforall x (Course(x, vonnie) and Adscripted(x) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Course(x, meara) and Rearrange(x, vonnie) -> Rearrange(vonnie, meara))\nforall x (Inward(x) -> Course(x, matthiew))\n\nnot Magnetised(vonnie)\n\nCourse(dannie, meara) and forall x (Course(x, meara) -> Rearrange(x, vonnie)) -> therefore Rearrange(dannie, vonnie) Course(dannie, meara) and Rearrange(dannie, vonnie) and forall x (Course(x, meara) and Rearrange(x, vonnie) -> Rearrange(vonnie, meara)) -> therefore Rearrange(vonnie, meara) Rearrange(vonnie, meara) and forall x (Rearrange(x, meara) -> Magnetised(x)) -> therefore Magnetised(vonnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The bernette disbar the griffin. The bernette scribe the griffin. The rosene smile the bernette. The ame is unskillful. The griffin smile the ame. The griffin disbar the bernette. The griffin scribe the ame. If someone scribe the bernette then they are straying. If someone smile the bernette then they visit the ame. If someone scribe the ame and they visit the griffin then they need the ame. If someone is straying then they chase the rosene. All camphoric, grimy people are straying. If someone smile the ame and they are unruly then they are unskillful. If someone smile the bernette and they visit the ame then the ame scribe the bernette. If someone is unskillful then they chase the griffin. The bernette does not visit the ame.", "logic": "\nDisbar(bernette, griffin)\nScribe(bernette, griffin)\nSmile(rosene, bernette)\nUnskillful(ame)\nSmile(griffin, ame)\nDisbar(griffin, bernette)\nScribe(griffin, ame)\nforall x (Scribe(x, bernette) -> Straying(x))\nforall x (Smile(x, bernette) -> Scribe(x, ame))\nforall x (Scribe(x, ame) and Scribe(x, griffin) -> Disbar(x, ame))\nforall x (Straying(x) -> Smile(x, rosene))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) and Grimy(x) -> Straying(x))\nforall x (Smile(x, ame) and Unruly(x) -> Unskillful(x))\nforall x (Smile(x, bernette) and Scribe(x, ame) -> Scribe(ame, bernette))\nforall x (Unskillful(x) -> Smile(x, griffin))\n\nnot Scribe(bernette, ame)\n\nforall x (Smile(x, bernette) -> Scribe(x, ame)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The aubrette skip the piotr. The aubrette pose the piotr. The trixy button the aubrette. The leonhard is citrous. The piotr button the leonhard. The piotr skip the aubrette. The piotr pose the leonhard. If someone pose the aubrette then they are choral. If someone button the aubrette then they visit the leonhard. If someone pose the leonhard and they visit the piotr then they need the leonhard. If someone is choral then they chase the trixy. All armored, subjective people are choral. If someone button the leonhard and they are parametric then they are citrous. If someone button the aubrette and they visit the leonhard then the leonhard pose the aubrette. If someone is citrous then they chase the piotr. The aubrette skip the leonhard.", "logic": "\nSkip(aubrette, piotr)\nPose(aubrette, piotr)\nButton(trixy, aubrette)\nCitrous(leonhard)\nButton(piotr, leonhard)\nSkip(piotr, aubrette)\nPose(piotr, leonhard)\nforall x (Pose(x, aubrette) -> Choral(x))\nforall x (Button(x, aubrette) -> Pose(x, leonhard))\nforall x (Pose(x, leonhard) and Pose(x, piotr) -> Skip(x, leonhard))\nforall x (Choral(x) -> Button(x, trixy))\nforall x (Armored(x) and Subjective(x) -> Choral(x))\nforall x (Button(x, leonhard) and Parametric(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Button(x, aubrette) and Pose(x, leonhard) -> Pose(leonhard, aubrette))\nforall x (Citrous(x) -> Button(x, piotr))\n\nSkip(aubrette, leonhard)\n\nforall x (Pose(x, leonhard) and Pose(x, piotr) -> Skip(x, leonhard)) <- forall x (Button(x, aubrette) -> Pose(x, leonhard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The reggis glamour the ricca. The reggis reeve the ricca. The luke inlay the reggis. The lorelle is ungoverned. The ricca inlay the lorelle. The ricca glamour the reggis. The ricca reeve the lorelle. If someone reeve the reggis then they are abstract. If someone inlay the reggis then they visit the lorelle. If someone reeve the lorelle and they visit the ricca then they need the lorelle. If someone is abstract then they chase the luke. All twopenny, labile people are abstract. If someone inlay the lorelle and they are granulose then they are ungoverned. If someone inlay the reggis and they visit the lorelle then the lorelle reeve the reggis. If someone is ungoverned then they chase the ricca. The ricca does not need the lorelle.", "logic": "\nGlamour(reggis, ricca)\nReeve(reggis, ricca)\nInlay(luke, reggis)\nUngoverned(lorelle)\nInlay(ricca, lorelle)\nGlamour(ricca, reggis)\nReeve(ricca, lorelle)\nforall x (Reeve(x, reggis) -> Abstract(x))\nforall x (Inlay(x, reggis) -> Reeve(x, lorelle))\nforall x (Reeve(x, lorelle) and Reeve(x, ricca) -> Glamour(x, lorelle))\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Inlay(x, luke))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Labile(x) -> Abstract(x))\nforall x (Inlay(x, lorelle) and Granulose(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Inlay(x, reggis) and Reeve(x, lorelle) -> Reeve(lorelle, reggis))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Inlay(x, ricca))\n\nnot Glamour(ricca, lorelle)\n\nforall x (Reeve(x, lorelle) and Reeve(x, ricca) -> Glamour(x, lorelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The amadeus commence the irvin. The amadeus dredge the irvin. The austine gambol the amadeus. The devon is slight. The irvin gambol the devon. The irvin commence the amadeus. The irvin dredge the devon. If someone dredge the amadeus then they are spurting. If someone gambol the amadeus then they visit the devon. If someone dredge the devon and they visit the irvin then they need the devon. If someone is spurting then they chase the austine. All eudaemonic, asinine people are spurting. If someone gambol the devon and they are vedic then they are slight. If someone gambol the amadeus and they visit the devon then the devon dredge the amadeus. If someone is slight then they chase the irvin. The austine is spurting.", "logic": "\nCommence(amadeus, irvin)\nDredge(amadeus, irvin)\nGambol(austine, amadeus)\nSlight(devon)\nGambol(irvin, devon)\nCommence(irvin, amadeus)\nDredge(irvin, devon)\nforall x (Dredge(x, amadeus) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Gambol(x, amadeus) -> Dredge(x, devon))\nforall x (Dredge(x, devon) and Dredge(x, irvin) -> Commence(x, devon))\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Gambol(x, austine))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) and Asinine(x) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Gambol(x, devon) and Vedic(x) -> Slight(x))\nforall x (Gambol(x, amadeus) and Dredge(x, devon) -> Dredge(devon, amadeus))\nforall x (Slight(x) -> Gambol(x, irvin))\n\nSpurting(austine)\n\nforall x (Dredge(x, amadeus) -> Spurting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The belva pole the angelico. The belva transfuse the angelico. The vanna incurvate the belva. The bettye is enamored. The angelico incurvate the bettye. The angelico pole the belva. The angelico transfuse the bettye. If someone transfuse the belva then they are tremendous. If someone incurvate the belva then they visit the bettye. If someone transfuse the bettye and they visit the angelico then they need the bettye. If someone is tremendous then they chase the vanna. All capitate, unshod people are tremendous. If someone incurvate the bettye and they are descendent then they are enamored. If someone incurvate the belva and they visit the bettye then the bettye transfuse the belva. If someone is enamored then they chase the angelico. The bettye does not need the belva.", "logic": "\nPole(belva, angelico)\nTransfuse(belva, angelico)\nIncurvate(vanna, belva)\nEnamored(bettye)\nIncurvate(angelico, bettye)\nPole(angelico, belva)\nTransfuse(angelico, bettye)\nforall x (Transfuse(x, belva) -> Tremendous(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, belva) -> Transfuse(x, bettye))\nforall x (Transfuse(x, bettye) and Transfuse(x, angelico) -> Pole(x, bettye))\nforall x (Tremendous(x) -> Incurvate(x, vanna))\nforall x (Capitate(x) and Unshod(x) -> Tremendous(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, bettye) and Descendent(x) -> Enamored(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, belva) and Transfuse(x, bettye) -> Transfuse(bettye, belva))\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> Incurvate(x, angelico))\n\nnot Pole(bettye, belva)\n\nnot Pole(bettye, belva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The lazarus scout the andy. The lazarus deglaze the andy. The blanca befuddle the lazarus. The sybil is stung. The andy befuddle the sybil. The andy scout the lazarus. The andy deglaze the sybil. If someone deglaze the lazarus then they are bivalve. If someone befuddle the lazarus then they visit the sybil. If someone deglaze the sybil and they visit the andy then they need the sybil. If someone is bivalve then they chase the blanca. All oriental, flip people are bivalve. If someone befuddle the sybil and they are chafed then they are stung. If someone befuddle the lazarus and they visit the sybil then the sybil deglaze the lazarus. If someone is stung then they chase the andy. The lazarus befuddle the sybil.", "logic": "\nScout(lazarus, andy)\nDeglaze(lazarus, andy)\nBefuddle(blanca, lazarus)\nStung(sybil)\nBefuddle(andy, sybil)\nScout(andy, lazarus)\nDeglaze(andy, sybil)\nforall x (Deglaze(x, lazarus) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, lazarus) -> Deglaze(x, sybil))\nforall x (Deglaze(x, sybil) and Deglaze(x, andy) -> Scout(x, sybil))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) -> Befuddle(x, blanca))\nforall x (Oriental(x) and Flip(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, sybil) and Chafed(x) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, lazarus) and Deglaze(x, sybil) -> Deglaze(sybil, lazarus))\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Befuddle(x, andy))\n\nBefuddle(lazarus, sybil)\n\nBefuddle(lazarus, sybil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The maryrose solder the maybelle. The maryrose bead the maybelle. The abigail splice the maryrose. The kyle is superfine. The maybelle splice the kyle. The maybelle solder the maryrose. The maybelle bead the kyle. If someone bead the maryrose then they are third. If someone splice the maryrose then they visit the kyle. If someone bead the kyle and they visit the maybelle then they need the kyle. If someone is third then they chase the abigail. All humourous, metacarpal people are third. If someone splice the kyle and they are nonspatial then they are superfine. If someone splice the maryrose and they visit the kyle then the kyle bead the maryrose. If someone is superfine then they chase the maybelle. The maybelle does not chase the maryrose.", "logic": "\nSolder(maryrose, maybelle)\nBead(maryrose, maybelle)\nSplice(abigail, maryrose)\nSuperfine(kyle)\nSplice(maybelle, kyle)\nSolder(maybelle, maryrose)\nBead(maybelle, kyle)\nforall x (Bead(x, maryrose) -> Third(x))\nforall x (Splice(x, maryrose) -> Bead(x, kyle))\nforall x (Bead(x, kyle) and Bead(x, maybelle) -> Solder(x, kyle))\nforall x (Third(x) -> Splice(x, abigail))\nforall x (Humourous(x) and Metacarpal(x) -> Third(x))\nforall x (Splice(x, kyle) and Nonspatial(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Splice(x, maryrose) and Bead(x, kyle) -> Bead(kyle, maryrose))\nforall x (Superfine(x) -> Splice(x, maybelle))\n\nnot Splice(maybelle, maryrose)\n\nnot Splice(maybelle, maryrose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The granville recharge the pietra. The granville lollygag the pietra. The birgit misread the granville. The louie is inexpert. The pietra misread the louie. The pietra recharge the granville. The pietra lollygag the louie. If someone lollygag the granville then they are cockeyed. If someone misread the granville then they visit the louie. If someone lollygag the louie and they visit the pietra then they need the louie. If someone is cockeyed then they chase the birgit. All elapsed, ownerless people are cockeyed. If someone misread the louie and they are manifold then they are inexpert. If someone misread the granville and they visit the louie then the louie lollygag the granville. If someone is inexpert then they chase the pietra. The granville misread the granville.", "logic": "\nRecharge(granville, pietra)\nLollygag(granville, pietra)\nMisread(birgit, granville)\nInexpert(louie)\nMisread(pietra, louie)\nRecharge(pietra, granville)\nLollygag(pietra, louie)\nforall x (Lollygag(x, granville) -> Cockeyed(x))\nforall x (Misread(x, granville) -> Lollygag(x, louie))\nforall x (Lollygag(x, louie) and Lollygag(x, pietra) -> Recharge(x, louie))\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) -> Misread(x, birgit))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Ownerless(x) -> Cockeyed(x))\nforall x (Misread(x, louie) and Manifold(x) -> Inexpert(x))\nforall x (Misread(x, granville) and Lollygag(x, louie) -> Lollygag(louie, granville))\nforall x (Inexpert(x) -> Misread(x, pietra))\n\nMisread(granville, granville)\n\nMisread(granville, granville) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "Ashlee is grapelike. Ashlee is not bipartizan. Ashlee is speechless. Ashlee is multistory. Griselda is glaciated. Hans is not grapelike. Hans is bipartizan. Wayne is grapelike. Wayne is not bipartizan. Wayne is speechless. If something is beguiled and speechless then it is multistory. All bipartizan things are not multistory. Quiet, beguiled things are grapelike. If something is multistory and not speechless then it is bipartizan. All multistory things are glaciated. All bipartizan things are not capsulate. If Griselda is bipartizan and Griselda is capsulate then Griselda is grapelike. All speechless things are beguiled. Ashlee is multistory.", "logic": "\nGrapelike(ashlee)\nnot Bipartizan(ashlee)\nSpeechless(ashlee)\nMultistory(ashlee)\nGlaciated(griselda)\nnot Grapelike(hans)\nBipartizan(hans)\nGrapelike(wayne)\nnot Bipartizan(wayne)\nSpeechless(wayne)\nforall x (Beguiled(x) and Speechless(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> not Multistory(x))\nforall x (Glaciated(x) and Beguiled(x) -> Grapelike(x))\nforall x (Multistory(x) and not Speechless(x) -> Bipartizan(x))\nforall x (Multistory(x) -> Glaciated(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> not Capsulate(x))\nBipartizan(griselda) and Capsulate(griselda) -> Grapelike(griselda)\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Beguiled(x))\n\nMultistory(ashlee)\n\ntherefore Multistory(ashlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Xymenes is curst. Xymenes is not unwavering. Xymenes is cubist. Xymenes is eulogistic. Tami is taxonomic. Page is not curst. Page is unwavering. Shamit is curst. Shamit is not unwavering. Shamit is cubist. If something is paperback and cubist then it is eulogistic. All unwavering things are not eulogistic. Quiet, paperback things are curst. If something is eulogistic and not cubist then it is unwavering. All eulogistic things are taxonomic. All unwavering things are not washable. If Tami is unwavering and Tami is washable then Tami is curst. All cubist things are paperback. Tami is not taxonomic.", "logic": "\nCurst(xymenes)\nnot Unwavering(xymenes)\nCubist(xymenes)\nEulogistic(xymenes)\nTaxonomic(tami)\nnot Curst(page)\nUnwavering(page)\nCurst(shamit)\nnot Unwavering(shamit)\nCubist(shamit)\nforall x (Paperback(x) and Cubist(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> not Eulogistic(x))\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) and Paperback(x) -> Curst(x))\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) and not Cubist(x) -> Unwavering(x))\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) -> Taxonomic(x))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> not Washable(x))\nUnwavering(tami) and Washable(tami) -> Curst(tami)\nforall x (Cubist(x) -> Paperback(x))\n\nnot Taxonomic(tami)\n\ntherefore Taxonomic(tami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Fifi is ninefold. Fifi is not acarpous. Fifi is adjectival. Fifi is epigastric. Cristina is unsightly. Lyndy is not ninefold. Lyndy is acarpous. Ardelle is ninefold. Ardelle is not acarpous. Ardelle is adjectival. If something is adducting and adjectival then it is epigastric. All acarpous things are not epigastric. Quiet, adducting things are ninefold. If something is epigastric and not adjectival then it is acarpous. All epigastric things are unsightly. All acarpous things are not feeble. If Cristina is acarpous and Cristina is feeble then Cristina is ninefold. All adjectival things are adducting. Fifi is adducting.", "logic": "\nNinefold(fifi)\nnot Acarpous(fifi)\nAdjectival(fifi)\nEpigastric(fifi)\nUnsightly(cristina)\nnot Ninefold(lyndy)\nAcarpous(lyndy)\nNinefold(ardelle)\nnot Acarpous(ardelle)\nAdjectival(ardelle)\nforall x (Adducting(x) and Adjectival(x) -> Epigastric(x))\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> not Epigastric(x))\nforall x (Unsightly(x) and Adducting(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Epigastric(x) and not Adjectival(x) -> Acarpous(x))\nforall x (Epigastric(x) -> Unsightly(x))\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> not Feeble(x))\nAcarpous(cristina) and Feeble(cristina) -> Ninefold(cristina)\nforall x (Adjectival(x) -> Adducting(x))\n\nAdducting(fifi)\n\nAdjectival(fifi) and forall x (Adjectival(x) -> Adducting(x)) -> therefore Adducting(fifi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Dasha is berrylike. Dasha is not organismal. Dasha is shouted. Dasha is savoury. Hildy is supernal. Engelbert is not berrylike. Engelbert is organismal. Taber is berrylike. Taber is not organismal. Taber is shouted. If something is barbarous and shouted then it is savoury. All organismal things are not savoury. Quiet, barbarous things are berrylike. If something is savoury and not shouted then it is organismal. All savoury things are supernal. All organismal things are not graspable. If Hildy is organismal and Hildy is graspable then Hildy is berrylike. All shouted things are barbarous. Dasha is not supernal.", "logic": "\nBerrylike(dasha)\nnot Organismal(dasha)\nShouted(dasha)\nSavoury(dasha)\nSupernal(hildy)\nnot Berrylike(engelbert)\nOrganismal(engelbert)\nBerrylike(taber)\nnot Organismal(taber)\nShouted(taber)\nforall x (Barbarous(x) and Shouted(x) -> Savoury(x))\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> not Savoury(x))\nforall x (Supernal(x) and Barbarous(x) -> Berrylike(x))\nforall x (Savoury(x) and not Shouted(x) -> Organismal(x))\nforall x (Savoury(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> not Graspable(x))\nOrganismal(hildy) and Graspable(hildy) -> Berrylike(hildy)\nforall x (Shouted(x) -> Barbarous(x))\n\nnot Supernal(dasha)\n\nSavoury(dasha) and forall x (Savoury(x) -> Supernal(x)) -> therefore Supernal(dasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Ame is incumbent. Ame is not casteless. Ame is eldest. Ame is enfeebling. Jinny is jerky. Min is not incumbent. Min is casteless. Nissie is incumbent. Nissie is not casteless. Nissie is eldest. If something is nidicolous and eldest then it is enfeebling. All casteless things are not enfeebling. Quiet, nidicolous things are incumbent. If something is enfeebling and not eldest then it is casteless. All enfeebling things are jerky. All casteless things are not canonical. If Jinny is casteless and Jinny is canonical then Jinny is incumbent. All eldest things are nidicolous. Nissie is enfeebling.", "logic": "\nIncumbent(ame)\nnot Casteless(ame)\nEldest(ame)\nEnfeebling(ame)\nJerky(jinny)\nnot Incumbent(min)\nCasteless(min)\nIncumbent(nissie)\nnot Casteless(nissie)\nEldest(nissie)\nforall x (Nidicolous(x) and Eldest(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> not Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) and Nidicolous(x) -> Incumbent(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) and not Eldest(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) -> Jerky(x))\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> not Canonical(x))\nCasteless(jinny) and Canonical(jinny) -> Incumbent(jinny)\nforall x (Eldest(x) -> Nidicolous(x))\n\nEnfeebling(nissie)\n\nEldest(nissie) and forall x (Eldest(x) -> Nidicolous(x)) -> therefore Nidicolous(nissie) Nidicolous(nissie) and Eldest(nissie) and forall x (Nidicolous(x) and Eldest(x) -> Enfeebling(x)) -> therefore Enfeebling(nissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Kimmy is christless. Kimmy is not coercive. Kimmy is incitive. Kimmy is benthonic. Dov is elongate. Hetti is not christless. Hetti is coercive. Tom is christless. Tom is not coercive. Tom is incitive. If something is retentive and incitive then it is benthonic. All coercive things are not benthonic. Quiet, retentive things are christless. If something is benthonic and not incitive then it is coercive. All benthonic things are elongate. All coercive things are not incertain. If Dov is coercive and Dov is incertain then Dov is christless. All incitive things are retentive. Tom is not benthonic.", "logic": "\nChristless(kimmy)\nnot Coercive(kimmy)\nIncitive(kimmy)\nBenthonic(kimmy)\nElongate(dov)\nnot Christless(hetti)\nCoercive(hetti)\nChristless(tom)\nnot Coercive(tom)\nIncitive(tom)\nforall x (Retentive(x) and Incitive(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nforall x (Coercive(x) -> not Benthonic(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) and Retentive(x) -> Christless(x))\nforall x (Benthonic(x) and not Incitive(x) -> Coercive(x))\nforall x (Benthonic(x) -> Elongate(x))\nforall x (Coercive(x) -> not Incertain(x))\nCoercive(dov) and Incertain(dov) -> Christless(dov)\nforall x (Incitive(x) -> Retentive(x))\n\nnot Benthonic(tom)\n\nIncitive(tom) and forall x (Incitive(x) -> Retentive(x)) -> therefore Retentive(tom) Retentive(tom) and Incitive(tom) and forall x (Retentive(x) and Incitive(x) -> Benthonic(x)) -> therefore Benthonic(tom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Elvira is foxy. Elvira is not nonunion. Elvira is scalelike. Elvira is priestly. Patrizia is xanthous. Caril is not foxy. Caril is nonunion. Berry is foxy. Berry is not nonunion. Berry is scalelike. If something is passe and scalelike then it is priestly. All nonunion things are not priestly. Quiet, passe things are foxy. If something is priestly and not scalelike then it is nonunion. All priestly things are xanthous. All nonunion things are not amatory. If Patrizia is nonunion and Patrizia is amatory then Patrizia is foxy. All scalelike things are passe. Berry is xanthous.", "logic": "\nFoxy(elvira)\nnot Nonunion(elvira)\nScalelike(elvira)\nPriestly(elvira)\nXanthous(patrizia)\nnot Foxy(caril)\nNonunion(caril)\nFoxy(berry)\nnot Nonunion(berry)\nScalelike(berry)\nforall x (Passe(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Priestly(x))\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> not Priestly(x))\nforall x (Xanthous(x) and Passe(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Priestly(x) and not Scalelike(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nforall x (Priestly(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> not Amatory(x))\nNonunion(patrizia) and Amatory(patrizia) -> Foxy(patrizia)\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Passe(x))\n\nXanthous(berry)\n\nScalelike(berry) and forall x (Scalelike(x) -> Passe(x)) -> therefore Passe(berry) Passe(berry) and Scalelike(berry) and forall x (Passe(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Priestly(x)) -> therefore Priestly(berry) Priestly(berry) and forall x (Priestly(x) -> Xanthous(x)) -> therefore Xanthous(berry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Nela is unknown. Nela is not gauche. Nela is unowned. Nela is arrogant. Rudd is outboard. Fyodor is not unknown. Fyodor is gauche. Colline is unknown. Colline is not gauche. Colline is unowned. If something is oversexed and unowned then it is arrogant. All gauche things are not arrogant. Quiet, oversexed things are unknown. If something is arrogant and not unowned then it is gauche. All arrogant things are outboard. All gauche things are not airlike. If Rudd is gauche and Rudd is airlike then Rudd is unknown. All unowned things are oversexed. Colline is not outboard.", "logic": "\nUnknown(nela)\nnot Gauche(nela)\nUnowned(nela)\nArrogant(nela)\nOutboard(rudd)\nnot Unknown(fyodor)\nGauche(fyodor)\nUnknown(colline)\nnot Gauche(colline)\nUnowned(colline)\nforall x (Oversexed(x) and Unowned(x) -> Arrogant(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> not Arrogant(x))\nforall x (Outboard(x) and Oversexed(x) -> Unknown(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) and not Unowned(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Outboard(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> not Airlike(x))\nGauche(rudd) and Airlike(rudd) -> Unknown(rudd)\nforall x (Unowned(x) -> Oversexed(x))\n\nnot Outboard(colline)\n\nUnowned(colline) and forall x (Unowned(x) -> Oversexed(x)) -> therefore Oversexed(colline) Oversexed(colline) and Unowned(colline) and forall x (Oversexed(x) and Unowned(x) -> Arrogant(x)) -> therefore Arrogant(colline) Arrogant(colline) and forall x (Arrogant(x) -> Outboard(x)) -> therefore Outboard(colline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Rupert is exacting. Rupert is not receding. Rupert is feral. Rupert is unusable. Murdock is snuff. Silvio is not exacting. Silvio is receding. Waneta is exacting. Waneta is not receding. Waneta is feral. If something is correlate and feral then it is unusable. All receding things are not unusable. Quiet, correlate things are exacting. If something is unusable and not feral then it is receding. All unusable things are snuff. All receding things are not sensed. If Murdock is receding and Murdock is sensed then Murdock is exacting. All feral things are correlate. Murdock is not unusable.", "logic": "\nExacting(rupert)\nnot Receding(rupert)\nFeral(rupert)\nUnusable(rupert)\nSnuff(murdock)\nnot Exacting(silvio)\nReceding(silvio)\nExacting(waneta)\nnot Receding(waneta)\nFeral(waneta)\nforall x (Correlate(x) and Feral(x) -> Unusable(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> not Unusable(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x) and Correlate(x) -> Exacting(x))\nforall x (Unusable(x) and not Feral(x) -> Receding(x))\nforall x (Unusable(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> not Sensed(x))\nReceding(murdock) and Sensed(murdock) -> Exacting(murdock)\nforall x (Feral(x) -> Correlate(x))\n\nnot Unusable(murdock)\n\nforall x (Correlate(x) and Feral(x) -> Unusable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Harland is exultant. Harland is not effortful. Harland is sexless. Harland is parented. Pier is undershot. Garwin is not exultant. Garwin is effortful. Julissa is exultant. Julissa is not effortful. Julissa is sexless. If something is nutlike and sexless then it is parented. All effortful things are not parented. Quiet, nutlike things are exultant. If something is parented and not sexless then it is effortful. All parented things are undershot. All effortful things are not zymolytic. If Pier is effortful and Pier is zymolytic then Pier is exultant. All sexless things are nutlike. Garwin is undershot.", "logic": "\nExultant(harland)\nnot Effortful(harland)\nSexless(harland)\nParented(harland)\nUndershot(pier)\nnot Exultant(garwin)\nEffortful(garwin)\nExultant(julissa)\nnot Effortful(julissa)\nSexless(julissa)\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Sexless(x) -> Parented(x))\nforall x (Effortful(x) -> not Parented(x))\nforall x (Undershot(x) and Nutlike(x) -> Exultant(x))\nforall x (Parented(x) and not Sexless(x) -> Effortful(x))\nforall x (Parented(x) -> Undershot(x))\nforall x (Effortful(x) -> not Zymolytic(x))\nEffortful(pier) and Zymolytic(pier) -> Exultant(pier)\nforall x (Sexless(x) -> Nutlike(x))\n\nUndershot(garwin)\n\nforall x (Parented(x) -> Undershot(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Lotta is windy. Lotta is not outsize. Lotta is harsh. Lotta is unguided. Linus is underslung. Lolly is not windy. Lolly is outsize. Michele is windy. Michele is not outsize. Michele is harsh. If something is thematic and harsh then it is unguided. All outsize things are not unguided. Quiet, thematic things are windy. If something is unguided and not harsh then it is outsize. All unguided things are underslung. All outsize things are not beamy. If Linus is outsize and Linus is beamy then Linus is windy. All harsh things are thematic. Lolly is not thematic.", "logic": "\nWindy(lotta)\nnot Outsize(lotta)\nHarsh(lotta)\nUnguided(lotta)\nUnderslung(linus)\nnot Windy(lolly)\nOutsize(lolly)\nWindy(michele)\nnot Outsize(michele)\nHarsh(michele)\nforall x (Thematic(x) and Harsh(x) -> Unguided(x))\nforall x (Outsize(x) -> not Unguided(x))\nforall x (Underslung(x) and Thematic(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) and not Harsh(x) -> Outsize(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) -> Underslung(x))\nforall x (Outsize(x) -> not Beamy(x))\nOutsize(linus) and Beamy(linus) -> Windy(linus)\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Thematic(x))\n\nnot Thematic(lolly)\n\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Thematic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Vasilis is curative. Vasilis is not understood. Vasilis is visceral. Vasilis is overland. Kimberlyn is mendicant. Nonna is not curative. Nonna is understood. Adah is curative. Adah is not understood. Adah is visceral. If something is basilary and visceral then it is overland. All understood things are not overland. Quiet, basilary things are curative. If something is overland and not visceral then it is understood. All overland things are mendicant. All understood things are not slashing. If Kimberlyn is understood and Kimberlyn is slashing then Kimberlyn is curative. All visceral things are basilary. Kimberlyn is basilary.", "logic": "\nCurative(vasilis)\nnot Understood(vasilis)\nVisceral(vasilis)\nOverland(vasilis)\nMendicant(kimberlyn)\nnot Curative(nonna)\nUnderstood(nonna)\nCurative(adah)\nnot Understood(adah)\nVisceral(adah)\nforall x (Basilary(x) and Visceral(x) -> Overland(x))\nforall x (Understood(x) -> not Overland(x))\nforall x (Mendicant(x) and Basilary(x) -> Curative(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and not Visceral(x) -> Understood(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) -> Mendicant(x))\nforall x (Understood(x) -> not Slashing(x))\nUnderstood(kimberlyn) and Slashing(kimberlyn) -> Curative(kimberlyn)\nforall x (Visceral(x) -> Basilary(x))\n\nBasilary(kimberlyn)\n\nforall x (Visceral(x) -> Basilary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Angel is dislikable. Angel is not stomatal. Angel is nameless. Angel is genovese. Melodie is abranchial. Clarence is not dislikable. Clarence is stomatal. Corine is dislikable. Corine is not stomatal. Corine is nameless. If something is semihard and nameless then it is genovese. All stomatal things are not genovese. Quiet, semihard things are dislikable. If something is genovese and not nameless then it is stomatal. All genovese things are abranchial. All stomatal things are not drear. If Melodie is stomatal and Melodie is drear then Melodie is dislikable. All nameless things are semihard. Clarence is not nameless.", "logic": "\nDislikable(angel)\nnot Stomatal(angel)\nNameless(angel)\nGenovese(angel)\nAbranchial(melodie)\nnot Dislikable(clarence)\nStomatal(clarence)\nDislikable(corine)\nnot Stomatal(corine)\nNameless(corine)\nforall x (Semihard(x) and Nameless(x) -> Genovese(x))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> not Genovese(x))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) and Semihard(x) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Genovese(x) and not Nameless(x) -> Stomatal(x))\nforall x (Genovese(x) -> Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> not Drear(x))\nStomatal(melodie) and Drear(melodie) -> Dislikable(melodie)\nforall x (Nameless(x) -> Semihard(x))\n\nnot Nameless(clarence)\n\nnot Nameless(clarence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Britt is malted. Britt is not thickening. Britt is motorless. Britt is saurian. Arielle is workable. Bertine is not malted. Bertine is thickening. Iseabal is malted. Iseabal is not thickening. Iseabal is motorless. If something is plantal and motorless then it is saurian. All thickening things are not saurian. Quiet, plantal things are malted. If something is saurian and not motorless then it is thickening. All saurian things are workable. All thickening things are not aweary. If Arielle is thickening and Arielle is aweary then Arielle is malted. All motorless things are plantal. Iseabal is aweary.", "logic": "\nMalted(britt)\nnot Thickening(britt)\nMotorless(britt)\nSaurian(britt)\nWorkable(arielle)\nnot Malted(bertine)\nThickening(bertine)\nMalted(iseabal)\nnot Thickening(iseabal)\nMotorless(iseabal)\nforall x (Plantal(x) and Motorless(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> not Saurian(x))\nforall x (Workable(x) and Plantal(x) -> Malted(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) and not Motorless(x) -> Thickening(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> not Aweary(x))\nThickening(arielle) and Aweary(arielle) -> Malted(arielle)\nforall x (Motorless(x) -> Plantal(x))\n\nAweary(iseabal)\n\nAweary(iseabal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Lavinie is revealing. Lavinie is not malevolent. Lavinie is relieved. Lavinie is sorted. Florian is primaeval. Ingeborg is not revealing. Ingeborg is malevolent. Jeromy is revealing. Jeromy is not malevolent. Jeromy is relieved. If something is epochal and relieved then it is sorted. All malevolent things are not sorted. Quiet, epochal things are revealing. If something is sorted and not relieved then it is malevolent. All sorted things are primaeval. All malevolent things are not staccato. If Florian is malevolent and Florian is staccato then Florian is revealing. All relieved things are epochal. Florian is not staccato.", "logic": "\nRevealing(lavinie)\nnot Malevolent(lavinie)\nRelieved(lavinie)\nSorted(lavinie)\nPrimaeval(florian)\nnot Revealing(ingeborg)\nMalevolent(ingeborg)\nRevealing(jeromy)\nnot Malevolent(jeromy)\nRelieved(jeromy)\nforall x (Epochal(x) and Relieved(x) -> Sorted(x))\nforall x (Malevolent(x) -> not Sorted(x))\nforall x (Primaeval(x) and Epochal(x) -> Revealing(x))\nforall x (Sorted(x) and not Relieved(x) -> Malevolent(x))\nforall x (Sorted(x) -> Primaeval(x))\nforall x (Malevolent(x) -> not Staccato(x))\nMalevolent(florian) and Staccato(florian) -> Revealing(florian)\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Epochal(x))\n\nnot Staccato(florian)\n\nnot Staccato(florian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Billi is tonal. Billi is not occipital. Billi is alabaster. Billi is unlikely. Russ is drugless. Fenelia is not tonal. Fenelia is occipital. Nickie is tonal. Nickie is not occipital. Nickie is alabaster. If something is anonymous and alabaster then it is unlikely. All occipital things are not unlikely. Quiet, anonymous things are tonal. If something is unlikely and not alabaster then it is occipital. All unlikely things are drugless. All occipital things are not uncharged. If Russ is occipital and Russ is uncharged then Russ is tonal. All alabaster things are anonymous. Russ is alabaster.", "logic": "\nTonal(billi)\nnot Occipital(billi)\nAlabaster(billi)\nUnlikely(billi)\nDrugless(russ)\nnot Tonal(fenelia)\nOccipital(fenelia)\nTonal(nickie)\nnot Occipital(nickie)\nAlabaster(nickie)\nforall x (Anonymous(x) and Alabaster(x) -> Unlikely(x))\nforall x (Occipital(x) -> not Unlikely(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) and Anonymous(x) -> Tonal(x))\nforall x (Unlikely(x) and not Alabaster(x) -> Occipital(x))\nforall x (Unlikely(x) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Occipital(x) -> not Uncharged(x))\nOccipital(russ) and Uncharged(russ) -> Tonal(russ)\nforall x (Alabaster(x) -> Anonymous(x))\n\nAlabaster(russ)\n\nAlabaster(russ) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "The cristabel is fissile. The cristabel trance the wake. The cristabel trance the roxi. The cristabel trance the vivian. The wake is infrared. The wake is unchained. The wake splotch the cristabel. The wake riffle the vivian. The roxi splotch the cristabel. The roxi splotch the vivian. The roxi riffle the wake. The vivian is fissile. The vivian is unchained. The vivian trance the cristabel. The vivian trance the roxi. The vivian riffle the cristabel. If someone splotch the wake then they need the roxi. If someone splotch the wake and the wake is thirteen then the wake trance the vivian. If the vivian splotch the wake then the vivian trance the wake. If someone trance the wake then they are thirteen. Cold, fissile people are fancy. If someone is thirteen and fissile then they need the wake. If someone riffle the wake then they need the roxi. If someone riffle the roxi then they like the cristabel. The vivian trance the cristabel.", "logic": "\nFissile(cristabel)\nTrance(cristabel, wake)\nTrance(cristabel, roxi)\nTrance(cristabel, vivian)\nInfrared(wake)\nUnchained(wake)\nSplotch(wake, cristabel)\nRiffle(wake, vivian)\nSplotch(roxi, cristabel)\nSplotch(roxi, vivian)\nRiffle(roxi, wake)\nFissile(vivian)\nUnchained(vivian)\nTrance(vivian, cristabel)\nTrance(vivian, roxi)\nRiffle(vivian, cristabel)\nforall x (Splotch(x, wake) -> Splotch(x, roxi))\nforall x (Splotch(x, wake) and Thirteen(wake) -> Trance(wake, vivian))\nSplotch(vivian, wake) -> Trance(vivian, wake)\nforall x (Trance(x, wake) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Thirteen(x) and Fissile(x) -> Fancy(x))\nforall x (Thirteen(x) and Fissile(x) -> Splotch(x, wake))\nforall x (Riffle(x, wake) -> Splotch(x, roxi))\nforall x (Riffle(x, roxi) -> Trance(x, cristabel))\n\nTrance(vivian, cristabel)\n\ntherefore Trance(vivian, cristabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The olenka is lucky. The olenka default the joell. The olenka default the roby. The olenka default the rosalie. The joell is minoan. The joell is vibrant. The joell head the olenka. The joell mummify the rosalie. The roby head the olenka. The roby head the rosalie. The roby mummify the joell. The rosalie is lucky. The rosalie is vibrant. The rosalie default the olenka. The rosalie default the roby. The rosalie mummify the olenka. If someone head the joell then they need the roby. If someone head the joell and the joell is yogistic then the joell default the rosalie. If the rosalie head the joell then the rosalie default the joell. If someone default the joell then they are yogistic. Cold, lucky people are operose. If someone is yogistic and lucky then they need the joell. If someone mummify the joell then they need the roby. If someone mummify the roby then they like the olenka. The rosalie does not like the olenka.", "logic": "\nLucky(olenka)\nDefault(olenka, joell)\nDefault(olenka, roby)\nDefault(olenka, rosalie)\nMinoan(joell)\nVibrant(joell)\nHead(joell, olenka)\nMummify(joell, rosalie)\nHead(roby, olenka)\nHead(roby, rosalie)\nMummify(roby, joell)\nLucky(rosalie)\nVibrant(rosalie)\nDefault(rosalie, olenka)\nDefault(rosalie, roby)\nMummify(rosalie, olenka)\nforall x (Head(x, joell) -> Head(x, roby))\nforall x (Head(x, joell) and Yogistic(joell) -> Default(joell, rosalie))\nHead(rosalie, joell) -> Default(rosalie, joell)\nforall x (Default(x, joell) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Yogistic(x) and Lucky(x) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Yogistic(x) and Lucky(x) -> Head(x, joell))\nforall x (Mummify(x, joell) -> Head(x, roby))\nforall x (Mummify(x, roby) -> Default(x, olenka))\n\nnot Default(rosalie, olenka)\n\ntherefore Default(rosalie, olenka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The victor is cosher. The victor tilt the parke. The victor tilt the carrie. The victor tilt the leorah. The parke is fabricated. The parke is quartan. The parke stonewash the victor. The parke impel the leorah. The carrie stonewash the victor. The carrie stonewash the leorah. The carrie impel the parke. The leorah is cosher. The leorah is quartan. The leorah tilt the victor. The leorah tilt the carrie. The leorah impel the victor. If someone stonewash the parke then they need the carrie. If someone stonewash the parke and the parke is overdone then the parke tilt the leorah. If the leorah stonewash the parke then the leorah tilt the parke. If someone tilt the parke then they are overdone. Cold, cosher people are dissilient. If someone is overdone and cosher then they need the parke. If someone impel the parke then they need the carrie. If someone impel the carrie then they like the victor. The carrie stonewash the carrie.", "logic": "\nCosher(victor)\nTilt(victor, parke)\nTilt(victor, carrie)\nTilt(victor, leorah)\nFabricated(parke)\nQuartan(parke)\nStonewash(parke, victor)\nImpel(parke, leorah)\nStonewash(carrie, victor)\nStonewash(carrie, leorah)\nImpel(carrie, parke)\nCosher(leorah)\nQuartan(leorah)\nTilt(leorah, victor)\nTilt(leorah, carrie)\nImpel(leorah, victor)\nforall x (Stonewash(x, parke) -> Stonewash(x, carrie))\nforall x (Stonewash(x, parke) and Overdone(parke) -> Tilt(parke, leorah))\nStonewash(leorah, parke) -> Tilt(leorah, parke)\nforall x (Tilt(x, parke) -> Overdone(x))\nforall x (Overdone(x) and Cosher(x) -> Dissilient(x))\nforall x (Overdone(x) and Cosher(x) -> Stonewash(x, parke))\nforall x (Impel(x, parke) -> Stonewash(x, carrie))\nforall x (Impel(x, carrie) -> Tilt(x, victor))\n\nStonewash(carrie, carrie)\n\nImpel(carrie, parke) and forall x (Impel(x, parke) -> Stonewash(x, carrie)) -> therefore Stonewash(carrie, carrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The devonna is frivolous. The devonna factorise the flor. The devonna factorise the whit. The devonna factorise the berte. The flor is silvery. The flor is unverified. The flor grouch the devonna. The flor vesiculate the berte. The whit grouch the devonna. The whit grouch the berte. The whit vesiculate the flor. The berte is frivolous. The berte is unverified. The berte factorise the devonna. The berte factorise the whit. The berte vesiculate the devonna. If someone grouch the flor then they need the whit. If someone grouch the flor and the flor is unmated then the flor factorise the berte. If the berte grouch the flor then the berte factorise the flor. If someone factorise the flor then they are unmated. Cold, frivolous people are resettled. If someone is unmated and frivolous then they need the flor. If someone vesiculate the flor then they need the whit. If someone vesiculate the whit then they like the devonna. The whit does not need the whit.", "logic": "\nFrivolous(devonna)\nFactorise(devonna, flor)\nFactorise(devonna, whit)\nFactorise(devonna, berte)\nSilvery(flor)\nUnverified(flor)\nGrouch(flor, devonna)\nVesiculate(flor, berte)\nGrouch(whit, devonna)\nGrouch(whit, berte)\nVesiculate(whit, flor)\nFrivolous(berte)\nUnverified(berte)\nFactorise(berte, devonna)\nFactorise(berte, whit)\nVesiculate(berte, devonna)\nforall x (Grouch(x, flor) -> Grouch(x, whit))\nforall x (Grouch(x, flor) and Unmated(flor) -> Factorise(flor, berte))\nGrouch(berte, flor) -> Factorise(berte, flor)\nforall x (Factorise(x, flor) -> Unmated(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Frivolous(x) -> Resettled(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Frivolous(x) -> Grouch(x, flor))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, flor) -> Grouch(x, whit))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, whit) -> Factorise(x, devonna))\n\nnot Grouch(whit, whit)\n\nVesiculate(whit, flor) and forall x (Vesiculate(x, flor) -> Grouch(x, whit)) -> therefore Grouch(whit, whit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The tibold is embonpoint. The tibold disrobe the eugenie. The tibold disrobe the lainey. The tibold disrobe the sanders. The eugenie is educated. The eugenie is based. The eugenie conk the tibold. The eugenie instal the sanders. The lainey conk the tibold. The lainey conk the sanders. The lainey instal the eugenie. The sanders is embonpoint. The sanders is based. The sanders disrobe the tibold. The sanders disrobe the lainey. The sanders instal the tibold. If someone conk the eugenie then they need the lainey. If someone conk the eugenie and the eugenie is unborn then the eugenie disrobe the sanders. If the sanders conk the eugenie then the sanders disrobe the eugenie. If someone disrobe the eugenie then they are unborn. Cold, embonpoint people are debasing. If someone is unborn and embonpoint then they need the eugenie. If someone instal the eugenie then they need the lainey. If someone instal the lainey then they like the tibold. The tibold is debasing.", "logic": "\nEmbonpoint(tibold)\nDisrobe(tibold, eugenie)\nDisrobe(tibold, lainey)\nDisrobe(tibold, sanders)\nEducated(eugenie)\nBased(eugenie)\nConk(eugenie, tibold)\nInstal(eugenie, sanders)\nConk(lainey, tibold)\nConk(lainey, sanders)\nInstal(lainey, eugenie)\nEmbonpoint(sanders)\nBased(sanders)\nDisrobe(sanders, tibold)\nDisrobe(sanders, lainey)\nInstal(sanders, tibold)\nforall x (Conk(x, eugenie) -> Conk(x, lainey))\nforall x (Conk(x, eugenie) and Unborn(eugenie) -> Disrobe(eugenie, sanders))\nConk(sanders, eugenie) -> Disrobe(sanders, eugenie)\nforall x (Disrobe(x, eugenie) -> Unborn(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) and Embonpoint(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) and Embonpoint(x) -> Conk(x, eugenie))\nforall x (Instal(x, eugenie) -> Conk(x, lainey))\nforall x (Instal(x, lainey) -> Disrobe(x, tibold))\n\nDebasing(tibold)\n\nDisrobe(tibold, eugenie) and forall x (Disrobe(x, eugenie) -> Unborn(x)) -> therefore Unborn(tibold) Unborn(tibold) and Embonpoint(tibold) and forall x (Unborn(x) and Embonpoint(x) -> Debasing(x)) -> therefore Debasing(tibold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The louis is reportable. The louis scotch the crysta. The louis scotch the hilbert. The louis scotch the tiffi. The crysta is bantam. The crysta is waxy. The crysta letter the louis. The crysta coldwork the tiffi. The hilbert letter the louis. The hilbert letter the tiffi. The hilbert coldwork the crysta. The tiffi is reportable. The tiffi is waxy. The tiffi scotch the louis. The tiffi scotch the hilbert. The tiffi coldwork the louis. If someone letter the crysta then they need the hilbert. If someone letter the crysta and the crysta is scabrous then the crysta scotch the tiffi. If the tiffi letter the crysta then the tiffi scotch the crysta. If someone scotch the crysta then they are scabrous. Cold, reportable people are bicameral. If someone is scabrous and reportable then they need the crysta. If someone coldwork the crysta then they need the hilbert. If someone coldwork the hilbert then they like the louis. The louis does not need the crysta.", "logic": "\nReportable(louis)\nScotch(louis, crysta)\nScotch(louis, hilbert)\nScotch(louis, tiffi)\nBantam(crysta)\nWaxy(crysta)\nLetter(crysta, louis)\nColdwork(crysta, tiffi)\nLetter(hilbert, louis)\nLetter(hilbert, tiffi)\nColdwork(hilbert, crysta)\nReportable(tiffi)\nWaxy(tiffi)\nScotch(tiffi, louis)\nScotch(tiffi, hilbert)\nColdwork(tiffi, louis)\nforall x (Letter(x, crysta) -> Letter(x, hilbert))\nforall x (Letter(x, crysta) and Scabrous(crysta) -> Scotch(crysta, tiffi))\nLetter(tiffi, crysta) -> Scotch(tiffi, crysta)\nforall x (Scotch(x, crysta) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Reportable(x) -> Bicameral(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Reportable(x) -> Letter(x, crysta))\nforall x (Coldwork(x, crysta) -> Letter(x, hilbert))\nforall x (Coldwork(x, hilbert) -> Scotch(x, louis))\n\nnot Letter(louis, crysta)\n\nScotch(louis, crysta) and forall x (Scotch(x, crysta) -> Scabrous(x)) -> therefore Scabrous(louis) Scabrous(louis) and Reportable(louis) and forall x (Scabrous(x) and Reportable(x) -> Letter(x, crysta)) -> therefore Letter(louis, crysta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The belle is rheumatoid. The belle miniate the wenona. The belle miniate the page. The belle miniate the abra. The wenona is epigastric. The wenona is controlled. The wenona motivate the belle. The wenona opalize the abra. The page motivate the belle. The page motivate the abra. The page opalize the wenona. The abra is rheumatoid. The abra is controlled. The abra miniate the belle. The abra miniate the page. The abra opalize the belle. If someone motivate the wenona then they need the page. If someone motivate the wenona and the wenona is inward then the wenona miniate the abra. If the abra motivate the wenona then the abra miniate the wenona. If someone miniate the wenona then they are inward. Cold, rheumatoid people are marvelous. If someone is inward and rheumatoid then they need the wenona. If someone opalize the wenona then they need the page. If someone opalize the page then they like the belle. The belle motivate the page.", "logic": "\nRheumatoid(belle)\nMiniate(belle, wenona)\nMiniate(belle, page)\nMiniate(belle, abra)\nEpigastric(wenona)\nControlled(wenona)\nMotivate(wenona, belle)\nOpalize(wenona, abra)\nMotivate(page, belle)\nMotivate(page, abra)\nOpalize(page, wenona)\nRheumatoid(abra)\nControlled(abra)\nMiniate(abra, belle)\nMiniate(abra, page)\nOpalize(abra, belle)\nforall x (Motivate(x, wenona) -> Motivate(x, page))\nforall x (Motivate(x, wenona) and Inward(wenona) -> Miniate(wenona, abra))\nMotivate(abra, wenona) -> Miniate(abra, wenona)\nforall x (Miniate(x, wenona) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Rheumatoid(x) -> Marvelous(x))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Rheumatoid(x) -> Motivate(x, wenona))\nforall x (Opalize(x, wenona) -> Motivate(x, page))\nforall x (Opalize(x, page) -> Miniate(x, belle))\n\nMotivate(belle, page)\n\nMiniate(belle, wenona) and forall x (Miniate(x, wenona) -> Inward(x)) -> therefore Inward(belle) Inward(belle) and Rheumatoid(belle) and forall x (Inward(x) and Rheumatoid(x) -> Motivate(x, wenona)) -> therefore Motivate(belle, wenona) Motivate(belle, wenona) and forall x (Motivate(x, wenona) -> Motivate(x, page)) -> therefore Motivate(belle, page)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The lenny is pale. The lenny leather the deeann. The lenny leather the kikelia. The lenny leather the emelda. The deeann is isochronal. The deeann is uncool. The deeann hiccough the lenny. The deeann unclip the emelda. The kikelia hiccough the lenny. The kikelia hiccough the emelda. The kikelia unclip the deeann. The emelda is pale. The emelda is uncool. The emelda leather the lenny. The emelda leather the kikelia. The emelda unclip the lenny. If someone hiccough the deeann then they need the kikelia. If someone hiccough the deeann and the deeann is markovian then the deeann leather the emelda. If the emelda hiccough the deeann then the emelda leather the deeann. If someone leather the deeann then they are markovian. Cold, pale people are unequal. If someone is markovian and pale then they need the deeann. If someone unclip the deeann then they need the kikelia. If someone unclip the kikelia then they like the lenny. The lenny does not need the kikelia.", "logic": "\nPale(lenny)\nLeather(lenny, deeann)\nLeather(lenny, kikelia)\nLeather(lenny, emelda)\nIsochronal(deeann)\nUncool(deeann)\nHiccough(deeann, lenny)\nUnclip(deeann, emelda)\nHiccough(kikelia, lenny)\nHiccough(kikelia, emelda)\nUnclip(kikelia, deeann)\nPale(emelda)\nUncool(emelda)\nLeather(emelda, lenny)\nLeather(emelda, kikelia)\nUnclip(emelda, lenny)\nforall x (Hiccough(x, deeann) -> Hiccough(x, kikelia))\nforall x (Hiccough(x, deeann) and Markovian(deeann) -> Leather(deeann, emelda))\nHiccough(emelda, deeann) -> Leather(emelda, deeann)\nforall x (Leather(x, deeann) -> Markovian(x))\nforall x (Markovian(x) and Pale(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Markovian(x) and Pale(x) -> Hiccough(x, deeann))\nforall x (Unclip(x, deeann) -> Hiccough(x, kikelia))\nforall x (Unclip(x, kikelia) -> Leather(x, lenny))\n\nnot Hiccough(lenny, kikelia)\n\nLeather(lenny, deeann) and forall x (Leather(x, deeann) -> Markovian(x)) -> therefore Markovian(lenny) Markovian(lenny) and Pale(lenny) and forall x (Markovian(x) and Pale(x) -> Hiccough(x, deeann)) -> therefore Hiccough(lenny, deeann) Hiccough(lenny, deeann) and forall x (Hiccough(x, deeann) -> Hiccough(x, kikelia)) -> therefore Hiccough(lenny, kikelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The norean is parotid. The norean canal the davy. The norean canal the fancy. The norean canal the aliza. The davy is sylphlike. The davy is tamable. The davy sketch the norean. The davy practise the aliza. The fancy sketch the norean. The fancy sketch the aliza. The fancy practise the davy. The aliza is parotid. The aliza is tamable. The aliza canal the norean. The aliza canal the fancy. The aliza practise the norean. If someone sketch the davy then they need the fancy. If someone sketch the davy and the davy is canonic then the davy canal the aliza. If the aliza sketch the davy then the aliza canal the davy. If someone canal the davy then they are canonic. Cold, parotid people are lingual. If someone is canonic and parotid then they need the davy. If someone practise the davy then they need the fancy. If someone practise the fancy then they like the norean. The davy is not canonic.", "logic": "\nParotid(norean)\nCanal(norean, davy)\nCanal(norean, fancy)\nCanal(norean, aliza)\nSylphlike(davy)\nTamable(davy)\nSketch(davy, norean)\nPractise(davy, aliza)\nSketch(fancy, norean)\nSketch(fancy, aliza)\nPractise(fancy, davy)\nParotid(aliza)\nTamable(aliza)\nCanal(aliza, norean)\nCanal(aliza, fancy)\nPractise(aliza, norean)\nforall x (Sketch(x, davy) -> Sketch(x, fancy))\nforall x (Sketch(x, davy) and Canonic(davy) -> Canal(davy, aliza))\nSketch(aliza, davy) -> Canal(aliza, davy)\nforall x (Canal(x, davy) -> Canonic(x))\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Parotid(x) -> Lingual(x))\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Parotid(x) -> Sketch(x, davy))\nforall x (Practise(x, davy) -> Sketch(x, fancy))\nforall x (Practise(x, fancy) -> Canal(x, norean))\n\nnot Canonic(davy)\n\nforall x (Canal(x, davy) -> Canonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The sheldon is intolerant. The sheldon constitute the jane. The sheldon constitute the laurent. The sheldon constitute the carlie. The jane is noetic. The jane is unceasing. The jane bruit the sheldon. The jane lack the carlie. The laurent bruit the sheldon. The laurent bruit the carlie. The laurent lack the jane. The carlie is intolerant. The carlie is unceasing. The carlie constitute the sheldon. The carlie constitute the laurent. The carlie lack the sheldon. If someone bruit the jane then they need the laurent. If someone bruit the jane and the jane is dopey then the jane constitute the carlie. If the carlie bruit the jane then the carlie constitute the jane. If someone constitute the jane then they are dopey. Cold, intolerant people are darned. If someone is dopey and intolerant then they need the jane. If someone lack the jane then they need the laurent. If someone lack the laurent then they like the sheldon. The carlie bruit the laurent.", "logic": "\nIntolerant(sheldon)\nConstitute(sheldon, jane)\nConstitute(sheldon, laurent)\nConstitute(sheldon, carlie)\nNoetic(jane)\nUnceasing(jane)\nBruit(jane, sheldon)\nLack(jane, carlie)\nBruit(laurent, sheldon)\nBruit(laurent, carlie)\nLack(laurent, jane)\nIntolerant(carlie)\nUnceasing(carlie)\nConstitute(carlie, sheldon)\nConstitute(carlie, laurent)\nLack(carlie, sheldon)\nforall x (Bruit(x, jane) -> Bruit(x, laurent))\nforall x (Bruit(x, jane) and Dopey(jane) -> Constitute(jane, carlie))\nBruit(carlie, jane) -> Constitute(carlie, jane)\nforall x (Constitute(x, jane) -> Dopey(x))\nforall x (Dopey(x) and Intolerant(x) -> Darned(x))\nforall x (Dopey(x) and Intolerant(x) -> Bruit(x, jane))\nforall x (Lack(x, jane) -> Bruit(x, laurent))\nforall x (Lack(x, laurent) -> Constitute(x, sheldon))\n\nBruit(carlie, laurent)\n\nforall x (Bruit(x, jane) -> Bruit(x, laurent)) <- forall x (Dopey(x) and Intolerant(x) -> Bruit(x, jane)) <- forall x (Constitute(x, jane) -> Dopey(x)) <- Bruit(carlie, jane) -> Constitute(carlie, jane) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The joni is starchy. The joni unwind the mike. The joni unwind the vonni. The joni unwind the opal. The mike is overhanded. The mike is splenetic. The mike vacillate the joni. The mike stun the opal. The vonni vacillate the joni. The vonni vacillate the opal. The vonni stun the mike. The opal is starchy. The opal is splenetic. The opal unwind the joni. The opal unwind the vonni. The opal stun the joni. If someone vacillate the mike then they need the vonni. If someone vacillate the mike and the mike is cuneiform then the mike unwind the opal. If the opal vacillate the mike then the opal unwind the mike. If someone unwind the mike then they are cuneiform. Cold, starchy people are chorionic. If someone is cuneiform and starchy then they need the mike. If someone stun the mike then they need the vonni. If someone stun the vonni then they like the joni. The mike does not need the vonni.", "logic": "\nStarchy(joni)\nUnwind(joni, mike)\nUnwind(joni, vonni)\nUnwind(joni, opal)\nOverhanded(mike)\nSplenetic(mike)\nVacillate(mike, joni)\nStun(mike, opal)\nVacillate(vonni, joni)\nVacillate(vonni, opal)\nStun(vonni, mike)\nStarchy(opal)\nSplenetic(opal)\nUnwind(opal, joni)\nUnwind(opal, vonni)\nStun(opal, joni)\nforall x (Vacillate(x, mike) -> Vacillate(x, vonni))\nforall x (Vacillate(x, mike) and Cuneiform(mike) -> Unwind(mike, opal))\nVacillate(opal, mike) -> Unwind(opal, mike)\nforall x (Unwind(x, mike) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Starchy(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Starchy(x) -> Vacillate(x, mike))\nforall x (Stun(x, mike) -> Vacillate(x, vonni))\nforall x (Stun(x, vonni) -> Unwind(x, joni))\n\nnot Vacillate(mike, vonni)\n\nforall x (Vacillate(x, mike) -> Vacillate(x, vonni)) <- forall x (Cuneiform(x) and Starchy(x) -> Vacillate(x, mike)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The konstanze is garbled. The konstanze withdraw the mabelle. The konstanze withdraw the kelwin. The konstanze withdraw the marna. The mabelle is postal. The mabelle is bedded. The mabelle port the konstanze. The mabelle reallocate the marna. The kelwin port the konstanze. The kelwin port the marna. The kelwin reallocate the mabelle. The marna is garbled. The marna is bedded. The marna withdraw the konstanze. The marna withdraw the kelwin. The marna reallocate the konstanze. If someone port the mabelle then they need the kelwin. If someone port the mabelle and the mabelle is ladened then the mabelle withdraw the marna. If the marna port the mabelle then the marna withdraw the mabelle. If someone withdraw the mabelle then they are ladened. Cold, garbled people are iatrogenic. If someone is ladened and garbled then they need the mabelle. If someone reallocate the mabelle then they need the kelwin. If someone reallocate the kelwin then they like the konstanze. The mabelle is iatrogenic.", "logic": "\nGarbled(konstanze)\nWithdraw(konstanze, mabelle)\nWithdraw(konstanze, kelwin)\nWithdraw(konstanze, marna)\nPostal(mabelle)\nBedded(mabelle)\nPort(mabelle, konstanze)\nReallocate(mabelle, marna)\nPort(kelwin, konstanze)\nPort(kelwin, marna)\nReallocate(kelwin, mabelle)\nGarbled(marna)\nBedded(marna)\nWithdraw(marna, konstanze)\nWithdraw(marna, kelwin)\nReallocate(marna, konstanze)\nforall x (Port(x, mabelle) -> Port(x, kelwin))\nforall x (Port(x, mabelle) and Ladened(mabelle) -> Withdraw(mabelle, marna))\nPort(marna, mabelle) -> Withdraw(marna, mabelle)\nforall x (Withdraw(x, mabelle) -> Ladened(x))\nforall x (Ladened(x) and Garbled(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nforall x (Ladened(x) and Garbled(x) -> Port(x, mabelle))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, mabelle) -> Port(x, kelwin))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, kelwin) -> Withdraw(x, konstanze))\n\nIatrogenic(mabelle)\n\nforall x (Ladened(x) and Garbled(x) -> Iatrogenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The justina is sassy. The justina glass the mirella. The justina glass the stephanus. The justina glass the brigid. The mirella is sickening. The mirella is bracted. The mirella alkalise the justina. The mirella arborise the brigid. The stephanus alkalise the justina. The stephanus alkalise the brigid. The stephanus arborise the mirella. The brigid is sassy. The brigid is bracted. The brigid glass the justina. The brigid glass the stephanus. The brigid arborise the justina. If someone alkalise the mirella then they need the stephanus. If someone alkalise the mirella and the mirella is rippled then the mirella glass the brigid. If the brigid alkalise the mirella then the brigid glass the mirella. If someone glass the mirella then they are rippled. Cold, sassy people are practiced. If someone is rippled and sassy then they need the mirella. If someone arborise the mirella then they need the stephanus. If someone arborise the stephanus then they like the justina. The mirella is not sassy.", "logic": "\nSassy(justina)\nGlass(justina, mirella)\nGlass(justina, stephanus)\nGlass(justina, brigid)\nSickening(mirella)\nBracted(mirella)\nAlkalise(mirella, justina)\nArborise(mirella, brigid)\nAlkalise(stephanus, justina)\nAlkalise(stephanus, brigid)\nArborise(stephanus, mirella)\nSassy(brigid)\nBracted(brigid)\nGlass(brigid, justina)\nGlass(brigid, stephanus)\nArborise(brigid, justina)\nforall x (Alkalise(x, mirella) -> Alkalise(x, stephanus))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, mirella) and Rippled(mirella) -> Glass(mirella, brigid))\nAlkalise(brigid, mirella) -> Glass(brigid, mirella)\nforall x (Glass(x, mirella) -> Rippled(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) and Sassy(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) and Sassy(x) -> Alkalise(x, mirella))\nforall x (Arborise(x, mirella) -> Alkalise(x, stephanus))\nforall x (Arborise(x, stephanus) -> Glass(x, justina))\n\nnot Sassy(mirella)\n\nnot Sassy(mirella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The fonsie is detergent. The fonsie script the melisa. The fonsie script the daisey. The fonsie script the rockwell. The melisa is outmost. The melisa is fried. The melisa bugle the fonsie. The melisa sublimate the rockwell. The daisey bugle the fonsie. The daisey bugle the rockwell. The daisey sublimate the melisa. The rockwell is detergent. The rockwell is fried. The rockwell script the fonsie. The rockwell script the daisey. The rockwell sublimate the fonsie. If someone bugle the melisa then they need the daisey. If someone bugle the melisa and the melisa is next then the melisa script the rockwell. If the rockwell bugle the melisa then the rockwell script the melisa. If someone script the melisa then they are next. Cold, detergent people are pakistani. If someone is next and detergent then they need the melisa. If someone sublimate the melisa then they need the daisey. If someone sublimate the daisey then they like the fonsie. The melisa script the daisey.", "logic": "\nDetergent(fonsie)\nScript(fonsie, melisa)\nScript(fonsie, daisey)\nScript(fonsie, rockwell)\nOutmost(melisa)\nFried(melisa)\nBugle(melisa, fonsie)\nSublimate(melisa, rockwell)\nBugle(daisey, fonsie)\nBugle(daisey, rockwell)\nSublimate(daisey, melisa)\nDetergent(rockwell)\nFried(rockwell)\nScript(rockwell, fonsie)\nScript(rockwell, daisey)\nSublimate(rockwell, fonsie)\nforall x (Bugle(x, melisa) -> Bugle(x, daisey))\nforall x (Bugle(x, melisa) and Next(melisa) -> Script(melisa, rockwell))\nBugle(rockwell, melisa) -> Script(rockwell, melisa)\nforall x (Script(x, melisa) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Next(x) and Detergent(x) -> Pakistani(x))\nforall x (Next(x) and Detergent(x) -> Bugle(x, melisa))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, melisa) -> Bugle(x, daisey))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, daisey) -> Script(x, fonsie))\n\nScript(melisa, daisey)\n\nScript(melisa, daisey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The katharyn is puzzling. The katharyn palm the fernande. The katharyn palm the rubin. The katharyn palm the bernadine. The fernande is abaxial. The fernande is conforming. The fernande garnish the katharyn. The fernande dispossess the bernadine. The rubin garnish the katharyn. The rubin garnish the bernadine. The rubin dispossess the fernande. The bernadine is puzzling. The bernadine is conforming. The bernadine palm the katharyn. The bernadine palm the rubin. The bernadine dispossess the katharyn. If someone garnish the fernande then they need the rubin. If someone garnish the fernande and the fernande is unabused then the fernande palm the bernadine. If the bernadine garnish the fernande then the bernadine palm the fernande. If someone palm the fernande then they are unabused. Cold, puzzling people are bruising. If someone is unabused and puzzling then they need the fernande. If someone dispossess the fernande then they need the rubin. If someone dispossess the rubin then they like the katharyn. The rubin is not puzzling.", "logic": "\nPuzzling(katharyn)\nPalm(katharyn, fernande)\nPalm(katharyn, rubin)\nPalm(katharyn, bernadine)\nAbaxial(fernande)\nConforming(fernande)\nGarnish(fernande, katharyn)\nDispossess(fernande, bernadine)\nGarnish(rubin, katharyn)\nGarnish(rubin, bernadine)\nDispossess(rubin, fernande)\nPuzzling(bernadine)\nConforming(bernadine)\nPalm(bernadine, katharyn)\nPalm(bernadine, rubin)\nDispossess(bernadine, katharyn)\nforall x (Garnish(x, fernande) -> Garnish(x, rubin))\nforall x (Garnish(x, fernande) and Unabused(fernande) -> Palm(fernande, bernadine))\nGarnish(bernadine, fernande) -> Palm(bernadine, fernande)\nforall x (Palm(x, fernande) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and Puzzling(x) -> Bruising(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and Puzzling(x) -> Garnish(x, fernande))\nforall x (Dispossess(x, fernande) -> Garnish(x, rubin))\nforall x (Dispossess(x, rubin) -> Palm(x, katharyn))\n\nnot Puzzling(rubin)\n\nnot Puzzling(rubin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The nova is excused. The nova intimidate the tre. The nova intimidate the audi. The nova intimidate the rose. The tre is lamentable. The tre is livable. The tre converse the nova. The tre enlighten the rose. The audi converse the nova. The audi converse the rose. The audi enlighten the tre. The rose is excused. The rose is livable. The rose intimidate the nova. The rose intimidate the audi. The rose enlighten the nova. If someone converse the tre then they need the audi. If someone converse the tre and the tre is microbic then the tre intimidate the rose. If the rose converse the tre then the rose intimidate the tre. If someone intimidate the tre then they are microbic. Cold, excused people are declared. If someone is microbic and excused then they need the tre. If someone enlighten the tre then they need the audi. If someone enlighten the audi then they like the nova. The rose converse the nova.", "logic": "\nExcused(nova)\nIntimidate(nova, tre)\nIntimidate(nova, audi)\nIntimidate(nova, rose)\nLamentable(tre)\nLivable(tre)\nConverse(tre, nova)\nEnlighten(tre, rose)\nConverse(audi, nova)\nConverse(audi, rose)\nEnlighten(audi, tre)\nExcused(rose)\nLivable(rose)\nIntimidate(rose, nova)\nIntimidate(rose, audi)\nEnlighten(rose, nova)\nforall x (Converse(x, tre) -> Converse(x, audi))\nforall x (Converse(x, tre) and Microbic(tre) -> Intimidate(tre, rose))\nConverse(rose, tre) -> Intimidate(rose, tre)\nforall x (Intimidate(x, tre) -> Microbic(x))\nforall x (Microbic(x) and Excused(x) -> Declared(x))\nforall x (Microbic(x) and Excused(x) -> Converse(x, tre))\nforall x (Enlighten(x, tre) -> Converse(x, audi))\nforall x (Enlighten(x, audi) -> Intimidate(x, nova))\n\nConverse(rose, nova)\n\nConverse(rose, nova) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "Hadria is unifilar. Hadria is oblivious. Hadria is myopic. Hadria is jocund. Hadria is aground. Hadria is monoicous. Reena is unifilar. Reena is aground. Reena is monoicous. Jenine is jocund. Jenine is monoicous. Tallie is unifilar. Tallie is myopic. Tallie is jocund. Tallie is monoicous. If Reena is unifilar and Reena is aground then Reena is unbeaten. If Reena is unifilar and Reena is unbeaten then Reena is oblivious. Green, monoicous people are jocund. Hadria is aground.", "logic": "\nUnifilar(hadria)\nOblivious(hadria)\nMyopic(hadria)\nJocund(hadria)\nAground(hadria)\nMonoicous(hadria)\nUnifilar(reena)\nAground(reena)\nMonoicous(reena)\nJocund(jenine)\nMonoicous(jenine)\nUnifilar(tallie)\nMyopic(tallie)\nJocund(tallie)\nMonoicous(tallie)\nUnifilar(reena) and Aground(reena) -> Unbeaten(reena)\nUnifilar(reena) and Unbeaten(reena) -> Oblivious(reena)\nforall x (Oblivious(x) and Monoicous(x) -> Jocund(x))\n\nAground(hadria)\n\ntherefore Aground(hadria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Licha is nebulose. Licha is albescent. Licha is equable. Licha is tacit. Licha is terrene. Licha is unaltered. Kermit is nebulose. Kermit is terrene. Kermit is unaltered. Cosetta is tacit. Cosetta is unaltered. Dorothy is nebulose. Dorothy is equable. Dorothy is tacit. Dorothy is unaltered. If Kermit is nebulose and Kermit is terrene then Kermit is agitated. If Kermit is nebulose and Kermit is agitated then Kermit is albescent. Green, unaltered people are tacit. Licha is not equable.", "logic": "\nNebulose(licha)\nAlbescent(licha)\nEquable(licha)\nTacit(licha)\nTerrene(licha)\nUnaltered(licha)\nNebulose(kermit)\nTerrene(kermit)\nUnaltered(kermit)\nTacit(cosetta)\nUnaltered(cosetta)\nNebulose(dorothy)\nEquable(dorothy)\nTacit(dorothy)\nUnaltered(dorothy)\nNebulose(kermit) and Terrene(kermit) -> Agitated(kermit)\nNebulose(kermit) and Agitated(kermit) -> Albescent(kermit)\nforall x (Albescent(x) and Unaltered(x) -> Tacit(x))\n\nnot Equable(licha)\n\ntherefore Equable(licha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Heda is statewide. Heda is sprawling. Heda is rimeless. Heda is tippy. Heda is salt. Heda is tertian. Margaux is statewide. Margaux is salt. Margaux is tertian. Mallorie is tippy. Mallorie is tertian. Ruddy is statewide. Ruddy is rimeless. Ruddy is tippy. Ruddy is tertian. If Margaux is statewide and Margaux is salt then Margaux is spiteful. If Margaux is statewide and Margaux is spiteful then Margaux is sprawling. Green, tertian people are tippy. Margaux is spiteful.", "logic": "\nStatewide(heda)\nSprawling(heda)\nRimeless(heda)\nTippy(heda)\nSalt(heda)\nTertian(heda)\nStatewide(margaux)\nSalt(margaux)\nTertian(margaux)\nTippy(mallorie)\nTertian(mallorie)\nStatewide(ruddy)\nRimeless(ruddy)\nTippy(ruddy)\nTertian(ruddy)\nStatewide(margaux) and Salt(margaux) -> Spiteful(margaux)\nStatewide(margaux) and Spiteful(margaux) -> Sprawling(margaux)\nforall x (Sprawling(x) and Tertian(x) -> Tippy(x))\n\nSpiteful(margaux)\n\nStatewide(margaux) and Salt(margaux) and Statewide(margaux) and Salt(margaux) -> Spiteful(margaux) -> therefore Spiteful(margaux)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Elinore is rising. Elinore is coolheaded. Elinore is donatist. Elinore is boughed. Elinore is intertidal. Elinore is excited. Leigha is rising. Leigha is intertidal. Leigha is excited. Krystyna is boughed. Krystyna is excited. Kayley is rising. Kayley is donatist. Kayley is boughed. Kayley is excited. If Leigha is rising and Leigha is intertidal then Leigha is primitive. If Leigha is rising and Leigha is primitive then Leigha is coolheaded. Green, excited people are boughed. Leigha is not primitive.", "logic": "\nRising(elinore)\nCoolheaded(elinore)\nDonatist(elinore)\nBoughed(elinore)\nIntertidal(elinore)\nExcited(elinore)\nRising(leigha)\nIntertidal(leigha)\nExcited(leigha)\nBoughed(krystyna)\nExcited(krystyna)\nRising(kayley)\nDonatist(kayley)\nBoughed(kayley)\nExcited(kayley)\nRising(leigha) and Intertidal(leigha) -> Primitive(leigha)\nRising(leigha) and Primitive(leigha) -> Coolheaded(leigha)\nforall x (Coolheaded(x) and Excited(x) -> Boughed(x))\n\nnot Primitive(leigha)\n\nRising(leigha) and Intertidal(leigha) and Rising(leigha) and Intertidal(leigha) -> Primitive(leigha) -> therefore Primitive(leigha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Luelle is sheeplike. Luelle is indebted. Luelle is lentissimo. Luelle is muddied. Luelle is jointed. Luelle is sneaking. Neysa is sheeplike. Neysa is jointed. Neysa is sneaking. Heidi is muddied. Heidi is sneaking. Paddy is sheeplike. Paddy is lentissimo. Paddy is muddied. Paddy is sneaking. If Neysa is sheeplike and Neysa is jointed then Neysa is mammary. If Neysa is sheeplike and Neysa is mammary then Neysa is indebted. Green, sneaking people are muddied. Neysa is indebted.", "logic": "\nSheeplike(luelle)\nIndebted(luelle)\nLentissimo(luelle)\nMuddied(luelle)\nJointed(luelle)\nSneaking(luelle)\nSheeplike(neysa)\nJointed(neysa)\nSneaking(neysa)\nMuddied(heidi)\nSneaking(heidi)\nSheeplike(paddy)\nLentissimo(paddy)\nMuddied(paddy)\nSneaking(paddy)\nSheeplike(neysa) and Jointed(neysa) -> Mammary(neysa)\nSheeplike(neysa) and Mammary(neysa) -> Indebted(neysa)\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Sneaking(x) -> Muddied(x))\n\nIndebted(neysa)\n\nSheeplike(neysa) and Jointed(neysa) and Sheeplike(neysa) and Jointed(neysa) -> Mammary(neysa) -> therefore Mammary(neysa) Sheeplike(neysa) and Mammary(neysa) and Sheeplike(neysa) and Mammary(neysa) -> Indebted(neysa) -> therefore Indebted(neysa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Marv is uncrossed. Marv is optimum. Marv is defiant. Marv is patent. Marv is cancerous. Marv is strenuous. Ginni is uncrossed. Ginni is cancerous. Ginni is strenuous. Pennie is patent. Pennie is strenuous. Gavriel is uncrossed. Gavriel is defiant. Gavriel is patent. Gavriel is strenuous. If Ginni is uncrossed and Ginni is cancerous then Ginni is thalloid. If Ginni is uncrossed and Ginni is thalloid then Ginni is optimum. Green, strenuous people are patent. Ginni is not optimum.", "logic": "\nUncrossed(marv)\nOptimum(marv)\nDefiant(marv)\nPatent(marv)\nCancerous(marv)\nStrenuous(marv)\nUncrossed(ginni)\nCancerous(ginni)\nStrenuous(ginni)\nPatent(pennie)\nStrenuous(pennie)\nUncrossed(gavriel)\nDefiant(gavriel)\nPatent(gavriel)\nStrenuous(gavriel)\nUncrossed(ginni) and Cancerous(ginni) -> Thalloid(ginni)\nUncrossed(ginni) and Thalloid(ginni) -> Optimum(ginni)\nforall x (Optimum(x) and Strenuous(x) -> Patent(x))\n\nnot Optimum(ginni)\n\nUncrossed(ginni) and Cancerous(ginni) and Uncrossed(ginni) and Cancerous(ginni) -> Thalloid(ginni) -> therefore Thalloid(ginni) Uncrossed(ginni) and Thalloid(ginni) and Uncrossed(ginni) and Thalloid(ginni) -> Optimum(ginni) -> therefore Optimum(ginni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Marlane is concerned. Marlane is louche. Marlane is blastular. Marlane is archetypal. Marlane is aleatory. Marlane is obscene. Dionysus is concerned. Dionysus is aleatory. Dionysus is obscene. Viola is archetypal. Viola is obscene. Dana is concerned. Dana is blastular. Dana is archetypal. Dana is obscene. If Dionysus is concerned and Dionysus is aleatory then Dionysus is ectodermal. If Dionysus is concerned and Dionysus is ectodermal then Dionysus is louche. Green, obscene people are archetypal. Dionysus is archetypal.", "logic": "\nConcerned(marlane)\nLouche(marlane)\nBlastular(marlane)\nArchetypal(marlane)\nAleatory(marlane)\nObscene(marlane)\nConcerned(dionysus)\nAleatory(dionysus)\nObscene(dionysus)\nArchetypal(viola)\nObscene(viola)\nConcerned(dana)\nBlastular(dana)\nArchetypal(dana)\nObscene(dana)\nConcerned(dionysus) and Aleatory(dionysus) -> Ectodermal(dionysus)\nConcerned(dionysus) and Ectodermal(dionysus) -> Louche(dionysus)\nforall x (Louche(x) and Obscene(x) -> Archetypal(x))\n\nArchetypal(dionysus)\n\nConcerned(dionysus) and Aleatory(dionysus) and Concerned(dionysus) and Aleatory(dionysus) -> Ectodermal(dionysus) -> therefore Ectodermal(dionysus) Concerned(dionysus) and Ectodermal(dionysus) and Concerned(dionysus) and Ectodermal(dionysus) -> Louche(dionysus) -> therefore Louche(dionysus) Louche(dionysus) and Obscene(dionysus) and forall x (Louche(x) and Obscene(x) -> Archetypal(x)) -> therefore Archetypal(dionysus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Stuart is cockamamie. Stuart is unworkable. Stuart is biting. Stuart is rumpled. Stuart is levitical. Stuart is uncomely. Nolie is cockamamie. Nolie is levitical. Nolie is uncomely. Marcy is rumpled. Marcy is uncomely. Jenine is cockamamie. Jenine is biting. Jenine is rumpled. Jenine is uncomely. If Nolie is cockamamie and Nolie is levitical then Nolie is inedible. If Nolie is cockamamie and Nolie is inedible then Nolie is unworkable. Green, uncomely people are rumpled. Nolie is not rumpled.", "logic": "\nCockamamie(stuart)\nUnworkable(stuart)\nBiting(stuart)\nRumpled(stuart)\nLevitical(stuart)\nUncomely(stuart)\nCockamamie(nolie)\nLevitical(nolie)\nUncomely(nolie)\nRumpled(marcy)\nUncomely(marcy)\nCockamamie(jenine)\nBiting(jenine)\nRumpled(jenine)\nUncomely(jenine)\nCockamamie(nolie) and Levitical(nolie) -> Inedible(nolie)\nCockamamie(nolie) and Inedible(nolie) -> Unworkable(nolie)\nforall x (Unworkable(x) and Uncomely(x) -> Rumpled(x))\n\nnot Rumpled(nolie)\n\nCockamamie(nolie) and Levitical(nolie) and Cockamamie(nolie) and Levitical(nolie) -> Inedible(nolie) -> therefore Inedible(nolie) Cockamamie(nolie) and Inedible(nolie) and Cockamamie(nolie) and Inedible(nolie) -> Unworkable(nolie) -> therefore Unworkable(nolie) Unworkable(nolie) and Uncomely(nolie) and forall x (Unworkable(x) and Uncomely(x) -> Rumpled(x)) -> therefore Rumpled(nolie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Beatriz is dubious. Beatriz is shamefaced. Beatriz is acronymous. Beatriz is reentrant. Beatriz is zesty. Beatriz is cylindric. Clarette is dubious. Clarette is zesty. Clarette is cylindric. Zachariah is reentrant. Zachariah is cylindric. Orel is dubious. Orel is acronymous. Orel is reentrant. Orel is cylindric. If Clarette is dubious and Clarette is zesty then Clarette is habitual. If Clarette is dubious and Clarette is habitual then Clarette is shamefaced. Green, cylindric people are reentrant. Beatriz is not habitual.", "logic": "\nDubious(beatriz)\nShamefaced(beatriz)\nAcronymous(beatriz)\nReentrant(beatriz)\nZesty(beatriz)\nCylindric(beatriz)\nDubious(clarette)\nZesty(clarette)\nCylindric(clarette)\nReentrant(zachariah)\nCylindric(zachariah)\nDubious(orel)\nAcronymous(orel)\nReentrant(orel)\nCylindric(orel)\nDubious(clarette) and Zesty(clarette) -> Habitual(clarette)\nDubious(clarette) and Habitual(clarette) -> Shamefaced(clarette)\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and Cylindric(x) -> Reentrant(x))\n\nnot Habitual(beatriz)\n\nnot Habitual(beatriz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Meyer is uncheerful. Meyer is flakey. Meyer is rhomboid. Meyer is coalesced. Meyer is partisan. Meyer is bereaved. Haven is uncheerful. Haven is partisan. Haven is bereaved. Ruthe is coalesced. Ruthe is bereaved. Renata is uncheerful. Renata is rhomboid. Renata is coalesced. Renata is bereaved. If Haven is uncheerful and Haven is partisan then Haven is titillated. If Haven is uncheerful and Haven is titillated then Haven is flakey. Green, bereaved people are coalesced. Ruthe is uncheerful.", "logic": "\nUncheerful(meyer)\nFlakey(meyer)\nRhomboid(meyer)\nCoalesced(meyer)\nPartisan(meyer)\nBereaved(meyer)\nUncheerful(haven)\nPartisan(haven)\nBereaved(haven)\nCoalesced(ruthe)\nBereaved(ruthe)\nUncheerful(renata)\nRhomboid(renata)\nCoalesced(renata)\nBereaved(renata)\nUncheerful(haven) and Partisan(haven) -> Titillated(haven)\nUncheerful(haven) and Titillated(haven) -> Flakey(haven)\nforall x (Flakey(x) and Bereaved(x) -> Coalesced(x))\n\nUncheerful(ruthe)\n\nUncheerful(ruthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Leonie is frosty. Leonie is unframed. Leonie is amethyst. Leonie is palmatifid. Leonie is isomeric. Leonie is nonwoody. Sybille is frosty. Sybille is isomeric. Sybille is nonwoody. Timothy is palmatifid. Timothy is nonwoody. Paolina is frosty. Paolina is amethyst. Paolina is palmatifid. Paolina is nonwoody. If Sybille is frosty and Sybille is isomeric then Sybille is brutish. If Sybille is frosty and Sybille is brutish then Sybille is unframed. Green, nonwoody people are palmatifid. Timothy is not isomeric.", "logic": "\nFrosty(leonie)\nUnframed(leonie)\nAmethyst(leonie)\nPalmatifid(leonie)\nIsomeric(leonie)\nNonwoody(leonie)\nFrosty(sybille)\nIsomeric(sybille)\nNonwoody(sybille)\nPalmatifid(timothy)\nNonwoody(timothy)\nFrosty(paolina)\nAmethyst(paolina)\nPalmatifid(paolina)\nNonwoody(paolina)\nFrosty(sybille) and Isomeric(sybille) -> Brutish(sybille)\nFrosty(sybille) and Brutish(sybille) -> Unframed(sybille)\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Nonwoody(x) -> Palmatifid(x))\n\nnot Isomeric(timothy)\n\nnot Isomeric(timothy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Sanford is allargando. Sanford is eruptive. Sanford is plucky. Sanford is automatic. Sanford is topped. Sanford is lucifugal. Carita is allargando. Carita is topped. Carita is lucifugal. Sparky is automatic. Sparky is lucifugal. Kimmie is allargando. Kimmie is plucky. Kimmie is automatic. Kimmie is lucifugal. If Carita is allargando and Carita is topped then Carita is pettish. If Carita is allargando and Carita is pettish then Carita is eruptive. Green, lucifugal people are automatic. Kimmie is topped.", "logic": "\nAllargando(sanford)\nEruptive(sanford)\nPlucky(sanford)\nAutomatic(sanford)\nTopped(sanford)\nLucifugal(sanford)\nAllargando(carita)\nTopped(carita)\nLucifugal(carita)\nAutomatic(sparky)\nLucifugal(sparky)\nAllargando(kimmie)\nPlucky(kimmie)\nAutomatic(kimmie)\nLucifugal(kimmie)\nAllargando(carita) and Topped(carita) -> Pettish(carita)\nAllargando(carita) and Pettish(carita) -> Eruptive(carita)\nforall x (Eruptive(x) and Lucifugal(x) -> Automatic(x))\n\nTopped(kimmie)\n\nTopped(kimmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Henrique is stone. Henrique is mechanized. Henrique is naked. Henrique is legible. Henrique is formidable. Henrique is bottommost. Laurianne is stone. Laurianne is formidable. Laurianne is bottommost. Jeff is legible. Jeff is bottommost. Cassie is stone. Cassie is naked. Cassie is legible. Cassie is bottommost. If Laurianne is stone and Laurianne is formidable then Laurianne is cachectic. If Laurianne is stone and Laurianne is cachectic then Laurianne is mechanized. Green, bottommost people are legible. Cassie is not cachectic.", "logic": "\nStone(henrique)\nMechanized(henrique)\nNaked(henrique)\nLegible(henrique)\nFormidable(henrique)\nBottommost(henrique)\nStone(laurianne)\nFormidable(laurianne)\nBottommost(laurianne)\nLegible(jeff)\nBottommost(jeff)\nStone(cassie)\nNaked(cassie)\nLegible(cassie)\nBottommost(cassie)\nStone(laurianne) and Formidable(laurianne) -> Cachectic(laurianne)\nStone(laurianne) and Cachectic(laurianne) -> Mechanized(laurianne)\nforall x (Mechanized(x) and Bottommost(x) -> Legible(x))\n\nnot Cachectic(cassie)\n\nnot Cachectic(cassie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Oral is obovate. Oral is atlantic. Oral is hatched. Oral is savory. Oral is cultural. Oral is abyssal. Hermon is obovate. Hermon is cultural. Hermon is abyssal. Elwyn is savory. Elwyn is abyssal. Hermia is obovate. Hermia is hatched. Hermia is savory. Hermia is abyssal. If Hermon is obovate and Hermon is cultural then Hermon is kookie. If Hermon is obovate and Hermon is kookie then Hermon is atlantic. Green, abyssal people are savory. Elwyn is hatched.", "logic": "\nObovate(oral)\nAtlantic(oral)\nHatched(oral)\nSavory(oral)\nCultural(oral)\nAbyssal(oral)\nObovate(hermon)\nCultural(hermon)\nAbyssal(hermon)\nSavory(elwyn)\nAbyssal(elwyn)\nObovate(hermia)\nHatched(hermia)\nSavory(hermia)\nAbyssal(hermia)\nObovate(hermon) and Cultural(hermon) -> Kookie(hermon)\nObovate(hermon) and Kookie(hermon) -> Atlantic(hermon)\nforall x (Atlantic(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Savory(x))\n\nHatched(elwyn)\n\nHatched(elwyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Gert is unverified. Gert is driving. Gert is patient. Gert is grasslike. Gert is federal. Gert is untapped. Norene is unverified. Norene is federal. Norene is untapped. Harris is grasslike. Harris is untapped. Dawson is unverified. Dawson is patient. Dawson is grasslike. Dawson is untapped. If Norene is unverified and Norene is federal then Norene is canonised. If Norene is unverified and Norene is canonised then Norene is driving. Green, untapped people are grasslike. Norene is not patient.", "logic": "\nUnverified(gert)\nDriving(gert)\nPatient(gert)\nGrasslike(gert)\nFederal(gert)\nUntapped(gert)\nUnverified(norene)\nFederal(norene)\nUntapped(norene)\nGrasslike(harris)\nUntapped(harris)\nUnverified(dawson)\nPatient(dawson)\nGrasslike(dawson)\nUntapped(dawson)\nUnverified(norene) and Federal(norene) -> Canonised(norene)\nUnverified(norene) and Canonised(norene) -> Driving(norene)\nforall x (Driving(x) and Untapped(x) -> Grasslike(x))\n\nnot Patient(norene)\n\nnot Patient(norene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Eve is stentorian. Eve is contracted. Eve is prismatic. Eve is antitypic. Eve is spiderlike. Eve is forte. Yule is stentorian. Yule is spiderlike. Yule is forte. Marcelle is antitypic. Marcelle is forte. Celestyn is stentorian. Celestyn is prismatic. Celestyn is antitypic. Celestyn is forte. If Yule is stentorian and Yule is spiderlike then Yule is savage. If Yule is stentorian and Yule is savage then Yule is contracted. Green, forte people are antitypic. Celestyn is contracted.", "logic": "\nStentorian(eve)\nContracted(eve)\nPrismatic(eve)\nAntitypic(eve)\nSpiderlike(eve)\nForte(eve)\nStentorian(yule)\nSpiderlike(yule)\nForte(yule)\nAntitypic(marcelle)\nForte(marcelle)\nStentorian(celestyn)\nPrismatic(celestyn)\nAntitypic(celestyn)\nForte(celestyn)\nStentorian(yule) and Spiderlike(yule) -> Savage(yule)\nStentorian(yule) and Savage(yule) -> Contracted(yule)\nforall x (Contracted(x) and Forte(x) -> Antitypic(x))\n\nContracted(celestyn)\n\nContracted(celestyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "The sibella network the wye. The wye network the sibella. If something ruck the wye then it network the sibella. If the wye cantillate the sibella then the sibella is not unthinking. If the sibella network the wye then the sibella ruck the wye. If something ruck the wye and it network the sibella then the wye cantillate the sibella. If something ruck the wye and it does not visit the wye then the wye network the sibella. If the wye network the sibella and the wye does not see the sibella then the sibella is cruciate. If the sibella ruck the wye then the sibella is not cruciate. If something ruck the wye and it is not cruciate then it is not unshackled. The wye network the sibella.", "logic": "\nNetwork(sibella, wye)\nNetwork(wye, sibella)\nforall x (Ruck(x, wye) -> Network(x, sibella))\nCantillate(wye, sibella) -> not Unthinking(sibella)\nNetwork(sibella, wye) -> Ruck(sibella, wye)\nforall x (Ruck(x, wye) and Network(x, sibella) -> Cantillate(wye, sibella))\nforall x (Ruck(x, wye) and not Network(x, wye) -> Network(wye, sibella))\nNetwork(wye, sibella) and not Cantillate(wye, sibella) -> Cruciate(sibella)\nRuck(sibella, wye) -> not Cruciate(sibella)\nforall x (Ruck(x, wye) and not Cruciate(x) -> not Unshackled(x))\n\nNetwork(wye, sibella)\n\ntherefore Network(wye, sibella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The dorthea immolate the rhea. The rhea immolate the dorthea. If something rumour the rhea then it immolate the dorthea. If the rhea outpace the dorthea then the dorthea is not arborous. If the dorthea immolate the rhea then the dorthea rumour the rhea. If something rumour the rhea and it immolate the dorthea then the rhea outpace the dorthea. If something rumour the rhea and it does not visit the rhea then the rhea immolate the dorthea. If the rhea immolate the dorthea and the rhea does not see the dorthea then the dorthea is bookish. If the dorthea rumour the rhea then the dorthea is not bookish. If something rumour the rhea and it is not bookish then it is not contrabass. The dorthea does not visit the rhea.", "logic": "\nImmolate(dorthea, rhea)\nImmolate(rhea, dorthea)\nforall x (Rumour(x, rhea) -> Immolate(x, dorthea))\nOutpace(rhea, dorthea) -> not Arborous(dorthea)\nImmolate(dorthea, rhea) -> Rumour(dorthea, rhea)\nforall x (Rumour(x, rhea) and Immolate(x, dorthea) -> Outpace(rhea, dorthea))\nforall x (Rumour(x, rhea) and not Immolate(x, rhea) -> Immolate(rhea, dorthea))\nImmolate(rhea, dorthea) and not Outpace(rhea, dorthea) -> Bookish(dorthea)\nRumour(dorthea, rhea) -> not Bookish(dorthea)\nforall x (Rumour(x, rhea) and not Bookish(x) -> not Contrabass(x))\n\nnot Immolate(dorthea, rhea)\n\ntherefore Immolate(dorthea, rhea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The vitoria banter the goldi. The goldi banter the vitoria. If something sharpen the goldi then it banter the vitoria. If the goldi purpose the vitoria then the vitoria is not elfin. If the vitoria banter the goldi then the vitoria sharpen the goldi. If something sharpen the goldi and it banter the vitoria then the goldi purpose the vitoria. If something sharpen the goldi and it does not visit the goldi then the goldi banter the vitoria. If the goldi banter the vitoria and the goldi does not see the vitoria then the vitoria is upstage. If the vitoria sharpen the goldi then the vitoria is not upstage. If something sharpen the goldi and it is not upstage then it is not passable. The vitoria sharpen the goldi.", "logic": "\nBanter(vitoria, goldi)\nBanter(goldi, vitoria)\nforall x (Sharpen(x, goldi) -> Banter(x, vitoria))\nPurpose(goldi, vitoria) -> not Elfin(vitoria)\nBanter(vitoria, goldi) -> Sharpen(vitoria, goldi)\nforall x (Sharpen(x, goldi) and Banter(x, vitoria) -> Purpose(goldi, vitoria))\nforall x (Sharpen(x, goldi) and not Banter(x, goldi) -> Banter(goldi, vitoria))\nBanter(goldi, vitoria) and not Purpose(goldi, vitoria) -> Upstage(vitoria)\nSharpen(vitoria, goldi) -> not Upstage(vitoria)\nforall x (Sharpen(x, goldi) and not Upstage(x) -> not Passable(x))\n\nSharpen(vitoria, goldi)\n\nBanter(vitoria, goldi) and Banter(vitoria, goldi) -> Sharpen(vitoria, goldi) -> therefore Sharpen(vitoria, goldi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The jacquetta humiliate the alvera. The alvera humiliate the jacquetta. If something humble the alvera then it humiliate the jacquetta. If the alvera spring the jacquetta then the jacquetta is not choragic. If the jacquetta humiliate the alvera then the jacquetta humble the alvera. If something humble the alvera and it humiliate the jacquetta then the alvera spring the jacquetta. If something humble the alvera and it does not visit the alvera then the alvera humiliate the jacquetta. If the alvera humiliate the jacquetta and the alvera does not see the jacquetta then the jacquetta is vaporish. If the jacquetta humble the alvera then the jacquetta is not vaporish. If something humble the alvera and it is not vaporish then it is not anadromous. The jacquetta does not chase the alvera.", "logic": "\nHumiliate(jacquetta, alvera)\nHumiliate(alvera, jacquetta)\nforall x (Humble(x, alvera) -> Humiliate(x, jacquetta))\nSpring(alvera, jacquetta) -> not Choragic(jacquetta)\nHumiliate(jacquetta, alvera) -> Humble(jacquetta, alvera)\nforall x (Humble(x, alvera) and Humiliate(x, jacquetta) -> Spring(alvera, jacquetta))\nforall x (Humble(x, alvera) and not Humiliate(x, alvera) -> Humiliate(alvera, jacquetta))\nHumiliate(alvera, jacquetta) and not Spring(alvera, jacquetta) -> Vaporish(jacquetta)\nHumble(jacquetta, alvera) -> not Vaporish(jacquetta)\nforall x (Humble(x, alvera) and not Vaporish(x) -> not Anadromous(x))\n\nnot Humble(jacquetta, alvera)\n\nHumiliate(jacquetta, alvera) and Humiliate(jacquetta, alvera) -> Humble(jacquetta, alvera) -> therefore Humble(jacquetta, alvera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The sloan vowelize the hansel. The hansel vowelize the sloan. If something effectuate the hansel then it vowelize the sloan. If the hansel rubbish the sloan then the sloan is not monogamous. If the sloan vowelize the hansel then the sloan effectuate the hansel. If something effectuate the hansel and it vowelize the sloan then the hansel rubbish the sloan. If something effectuate the hansel and it does not visit the hansel then the hansel vowelize the sloan. If the hansel vowelize the sloan and the hansel does not see the sloan then the sloan is indistinct. If the sloan effectuate the hansel then the sloan is not indistinct. If something effectuate the hansel and it is not indistinct then it is not inhibited. The sloan is not indistinct.", "logic": "\nVowelize(sloan, hansel)\nVowelize(hansel, sloan)\nforall x (Effectuate(x, hansel) -> Vowelize(x, sloan))\nRubbish(hansel, sloan) -> not Monogamous(sloan)\nVowelize(sloan, hansel) -> Effectuate(sloan, hansel)\nforall x (Effectuate(x, hansel) and Vowelize(x, sloan) -> Rubbish(hansel, sloan))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, hansel) and not Vowelize(x, hansel) -> Vowelize(hansel, sloan))\nVowelize(hansel, sloan) and not Rubbish(hansel, sloan) -> Indistinct(sloan)\nEffectuate(sloan, hansel) -> not Indistinct(sloan)\nforall x (Effectuate(x, hansel) and not Indistinct(x) -> not Inhibited(x))\n\nnot Indistinct(sloan)\n\nVowelize(sloan, hansel) and Vowelize(sloan, hansel) -> Effectuate(sloan, hansel) -> therefore Effectuate(sloan, hansel) Effectuate(sloan, hansel) and Effectuate(sloan, hansel) -> not Indistinct(sloan) -> therefore not Indistinct(sloan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The lezlie behave the arliene. The arliene behave the lezlie. If something absolve the arliene then it behave the lezlie. If the arliene disk the lezlie then the lezlie is not ascendant. If the lezlie behave the arliene then the lezlie absolve the arliene. If something absolve the arliene and it behave the lezlie then the arliene disk the lezlie. If something absolve the arliene and it does not visit the arliene then the arliene behave the lezlie. If the arliene behave the lezlie and the arliene does not see the lezlie then the lezlie is nett. If the lezlie absolve the arliene then the lezlie is not nett. If something absolve the arliene and it is not nett then it is not biogenetic. The lezlie is nett.", "logic": "\nBehave(lezlie, arliene)\nBehave(arliene, lezlie)\nforall x (Absolve(x, arliene) -> Behave(x, lezlie))\nDisk(arliene, lezlie) -> not Ascendant(lezlie)\nBehave(lezlie, arliene) -> Absolve(lezlie, arliene)\nforall x (Absolve(x, arliene) and Behave(x, lezlie) -> Disk(arliene, lezlie))\nforall x (Absolve(x, arliene) and not Behave(x, arliene) -> Behave(arliene, lezlie))\nBehave(arliene, lezlie) and not Disk(arliene, lezlie) -> Nett(lezlie)\nAbsolve(lezlie, arliene) -> not Nett(lezlie)\nforall x (Absolve(x, arliene) and not Nett(x) -> not Biogenetic(x))\n\nNett(lezlie)\n\nBehave(lezlie, arliene) and Behave(lezlie, arliene) -> Absolve(lezlie, arliene) -> therefore Absolve(lezlie, arliene) Absolve(lezlie, arliene) and Absolve(lezlie, arliene) -> not Nett(lezlie) -> therefore not Nett(lezlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The milzie loathe the elie. The elie loathe the milzie. If something radicalize the elie then it loathe the milzie. If the elie grope the milzie then the milzie is not manned. If the milzie loathe the elie then the milzie radicalize the elie. If something radicalize the elie and it loathe the milzie then the elie grope the milzie. If something radicalize the elie and it does not visit the elie then the elie loathe the milzie. If the elie loathe the milzie and the elie does not see the milzie then the milzie is bigeneric. If the milzie radicalize the elie then the milzie is not bigeneric. If something radicalize the elie and it is not bigeneric then it is not suspicious. The elie grope the milzie.", "logic": "\nLoathe(milzie, elie)\nLoathe(elie, milzie)\nforall x (Radicalize(x, elie) -> Loathe(x, milzie))\nGrope(elie, milzie) -> not Manned(milzie)\nLoathe(milzie, elie) -> Radicalize(milzie, elie)\nforall x (Radicalize(x, elie) and Loathe(x, milzie) -> Grope(elie, milzie))\nforall x (Radicalize(x, elie) and not Loathe(x, elie) -> Loathe(elie, milzie))\nLoathe(elie, milzie) and not Grope(elie, milzie) -> Bigeneric(milzie)\nRadicalize(milzie, elie) -> not Bigeneric(milzie)\nforall x (Radicalize(x, elie) and not Bigeneric(x) -> not Suspicious(x))\n\nGrope(elie, milzie)\n\nLoathe(milzie, elie) and Loathe(milzie, elie) -> Radicalize(milzie, elie) -> therefore Radicalize(milzie, elie) Loathe(milzie, elie) and Loathe(milzie, elie) -> Radicalize(milzie, elie) -> therefore Radicalize(milzie, elie) Radicalize(milzie, elie) and forall x (Radicalize(x, elie) -> Loathe(x, milzie)) -> therefore Loathe(milzie, milzie) Radicalize(milzie, elie) and Loathe(milzie, milzie) and forall x (Radicalize(x, elie) and Loathe(x, milzie) -> Grope(elie, milzie)) -> therefore Grope(elie, milzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The nance station the endora. The endora station the nance. If something flood the endora then it station the nance. If the endora ravel the nance then the nance is not salivary. If the nance station the endora then the nance flood the endora. If something flood the endora and it station the nance then the endora ravel the nance. If something flood the endora and it does not visit the endora then the endora station the nance. If the endora station the nance and the endora does not see the nance then the nance is octal. If the nance flood the endora then the nance is not octal. If something flood the endora and it is not octal then it is not flying. The endora does not see the nance.", "logic": "\nStation(nance, endora)\nStation(endora, nance)\nforall x (Flood(x, endora) -> Station(x, nance))\nRavel(endora, nance) -> not Salivary(nance)\nStation(nance, endora) -> Flood(nance, endora)\nforall x (Flood(x, endora) and Station(x, nance) -> Ravel(endora, nance))\nforall x (Flood(x, endora) and not Station(x, endora) -> Station(endora, nance))\nStation(endora, nance) and not Ravel(endora, nance) -> Octal(nance)\nFlood(nance, endora) -> not Octal(nance)\nforall x (Flood(x, endora) and not Octal(x) -> not Flying(x))\n\nnot Ravel(endora, nance)\n\nStation(nance, endora) and Station(nance, endora) -> Flood(nance, endora) -> therefore Flood(nance, endora) Station(nance, endora) and Station(nance, endora) -> Flood(nance, endora) -> therefore Flood(nance, endora) Flood(nance, endora) and forall x (Flood(x, endora) -> Station(x, nance)) -> therefore Station(nance, nance) Flood(nance, endora) and Station(nance, nance) and forall x (Flood(x, endora) and Station(x, nance) -> Ravel(endora, nance)) -> therefore Ravel(endora, nance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The christean trek the dimitri. The dimitri trek the christean. If something mock the dimitri then it trek the christean. If the dimitri mosh the christean then the christean is not mastoidal. If the christean trek the dimitri then the christean mock the dimitri. If something mock the dimitri and it trek the christean then the dimitri mosh the christean. If something mock the dimitri and it does not visit the dimitri then the dimitri trek the christean. If the dimitri trek the christean and the dimitri does not see the christean then the christean is decreed. If the christean mock the dimitri then the christean is not decreed. If something mock the dimitri and it is not decreed then it is not scrabbly. The dimitri does not chase the dimitri.", "logic": "\nTrek(christean, dimitri)\nTrek(dimitri, christean)\nforall x (Mock(x, dimitri) -> Trek(x, christean))\nMosh(dimitri, christean) -> not Mastoidal(christean)\nTrek(christean, dimitri) -> Mock(christean, dimitri)\nforall x (Mock(x, dimitri) and Trek(x, christean) -> Mosh(dimitri, christean))\nforall x (Mock(x, dimitri) and not Trek(x, dimitri) -> Trek(dimitri, christean))\nTrek(dimitri, christean) and not Mosh(dimitri, christean) -> Decreed(christean)\nMock(christean, dimitri) -> not Decreed(christean)\nforall x (Mock(x, dimitri) and not Decreed(x) -> not Scrabbly(x))\n\nnot Mock(dimitri, dimitri)\n\nnot Mock(dimitri, dimitri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The alister like the jaynell. The jaynell like the alister. If something demo the jaynell then it like the alister. If the jaynell gesture the alister then the alister is not undisputed. If the alister like the jaynell then the alister demo the jaynell. If something demo the jaynell and it like the alister then the jaynell gesture the alister. If something demo the jaynell and it does not visit the jaynell then the jaynell like the alister. If the jaynell like the alister and the jaynell does not see the alister then the alister is pricey. If the alister demo the jaynell then the alister is not pricey. If something demo the jaynell and it is not pricey then it is not exotic. The jaynell like the jaynell.", "logic": "\nLike(alister, jaynell)\nLike(jaynell, alister)\nforall x (Demo(x, jaynell) -> Like(x, alister))\nGesture(jaynell, alister) -> not Undisputed(alister)\nLike(alister, jaynell) -> Demo(alister, jaynell)\nforall x (Demo(x, jaynell) and Like(x, alister) -> Gesture(jaynell, alister))\nforall x (Demo(x, jaynell) and not Like(x, jaynell) -> Like(jaynell, alister))\nLike(jaynell, alister) and not Gesture(jaynell, alister) -> Pricey(alister)\nDemo(alister, jaynell) -> not Pricey(alister)\nforall x (Demo(x, jaynell) and not Pricey(x) -> not Exotic(x))\n\nLike(jaynell, jaynell)\n\nLike(jaynell, jaynell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The cori outpace the gianina. The gianina outpace the cori. If something scrutinize the gianina then it outpace the cori. If the gianina yaup the cori then the cori is not disruptive. If the cori outpace the gianina then the cori scrutinize the gianina. If something scrutinize the gianina and it outpace the cori then the gianina yaup the cori. If something scrutinize the gianina and it does not visit the gianina then the gianina outpace the cori. If the gianina outpace the cori and the gianina does not see the cori then the cori is diminutive. If the cori scrutinize the gianina then the cori is not diminutive. If something scrutinize the gianina and it is not diminutive then it is not mediatory. The cori does not see the gianina.", "logic": "\nOutpace(cori, gianina)\nOutpace(gianina, cori)\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, gianina) -> Outpace(x, cori))\nYaup(gianina, cori) -> not Disruptive(cori)\nOutpace(cori, gianina) -> Scrutinize(cori, gianina)\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, gianina) and Outpace(x, cori) -> Yaup(gianina, cori))\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, gianina) and not Outpace(x, gianina) -> Outpace(gianina, cori))\nOutpace(gianina, cori) and not Yaup(gianina, cori) -> Diminutive(cori)\nScrutinize(cori, gianina) -> not Diminutive(cori)\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, gianina) and not Diminutive(x) -> not Mediatory(x))\n\nnot Yaup(cori, gianina)\n\nnot Yaup(cori, gianina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The rosamund reunify the ora. The ora reunify the rosamund. If something reposit the ora then it reunify the rosamund. If the ora batter the rosamund then the rosamund is not nitid. If the rosamund reunify the ora then the rosamund reposit the ora. If something reposit the ora and it reunify the rosamund then the ora batter the rosamund. If something reposit the ora and it does not visit the ora then the ora reunify the rosamund. If the ora reunify the rosamund and the ora does not see the rosamund then the rosamund is supplicant. If the rosamund reposit the ora then the rosamund is not supplicant. If something reposit the ora and it is not supplicant then it is not musty. The ora is musty.", "logic": "\nReunify(rosamund, ora)\nReunify(ora, rosamund)\nforall x (Reposit(x, ora) -> Reunify(x, rosamund))\nBatter(ora, rosamund) -> not Nitid(rosamund)\nReunify(rosamund, ora) -> Reposit(rosamund, ora)\nforall x (Reposit(x, ora) and Reunify(x, rosamund) -> Batter(ora, rosamund))\nforall x (Reposit(x, ora) and not Reunify(x, ora) -> Reunify(ora, rosamund))\nReunify(ora, rosamund) and not Batter(ora, rosamund) -> Supplicant(rosamund)\nReposit(rosamund, ora) -> not Supplicant(rosamund)\nforall x (Reposit(x, ora) and not Supplicant(x) -> not Musty(x))\n\nMusty(ora)\n\nMusty(ora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The carrol grip the rosabella. The rosabella grip the carrol. If something twirp the rosabella then it grip the carrol. If the rosabella munition the carrol then the carrol is not tartaric. If the carrol grip the rosabella then the carrol twirp the rosabella. If something twirp the rosabella and it grip the carrol then the rosabella munition the carrol. If something twirp the rosabella and it does not visit the rosabella then the rosabella grip the carrol. If the rosabella grip the carrol and the rosabella does not see the carrol then the carrol is madcap. If the carrol twirp the rosabella then the carrol is not madcap. If something twirp the rosabella and it is not madcap then it is not bawdy. The rosabella does not chase the carrol.", "logic": "\nGrip(carrol, rosabella)\nGrip(rosabella, carrol)\nforall x (Twirp(x, rosabella) -> Grip(x, carrol))\nMunition(rosabella, carrol) -> not Tartaric(carrol)\nGrip(carrol, rosabella) -> Twirp(carrol, rosabella)\nforall x (Twirp(x, rosabella) and Grip(x, carrol) -> Munition(rosabella, carrol))\nforall x (Twirp(x, rosabella) and not Grip(x, rosabella) -> Grip(rosabella, carrol))\nGrip(rosabella, carrol) and not Munition(rosabella, carrol) -> Madcap(carrol)\nTwirp(carrol, rosabella) -> not Madcap(carrol)\nforall x (Twirp(x, rosabella) and not Madcap(x) -> not Bawdy(x))\n\nnot Twirp(rosabella, carrol)\n\nnot Twirp(rosabella, carrol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The judie access the joyann. The joyann access the judie. If something connote the joyann then it access the judie. If the joyann accent the judie then the judie is not considered. If the judie access the joyann then the judie connote the joyann. If something connote the joyann and it access the judie then the joyann accent the judie. If something connote the joyann and it does not visit the joyann then the joyann access the judie. If the joyann access the judie and the joyann does not see the judie then the judie is benthal. If the judie connote the joyann then the judie is not benthal. If something connote the joyann and it is not benthal then it is not subarctic. The joyann accent the joyann.", "logic": "\nAccess(judie, joyann)\nAccess(joyann, judie)\nforall x (Connote(x, joyann) -> Access(x, judie))\nAccent(joyann, judie) -> not Considered(judie)\nAccess(judie, joyann) -> Connote(judie, joyann)\nforall x (Connote(x, joyann) and Access(x, judie) -> Accent(joyann, judie))\nforall x (Connote(x, joyann) and not Access(x, joyann) -> Access(joyann, judie))\nAccess(joyann, judie) and not Accent(joyann, judie) -> Benthal(judie)\nConnote(judie, joyann) -> not Benthal(judie)\nforall x (Connote(x, joyann) and not Benthal(x) -> not Subarctic(x))\n\nAccent(joyann, joyann)\n\nAccent(joyann, joyann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The tann stargaze the zebedee. The zebedee stargaze the tann. If something attempt the zebedee then it stargaze the tann. If the zebedee mousse the tann then the tann is not knowing. If the tann stargaze the zebedee then the tann attempt the zebedee. If something attempt the zebedee and it stargaze the tann then the zebedee mousse the tann. If something attempt the zebedee and it does not visit the zebedee then the zebedee stargaze the tann. If the zebedee stargaze the tann and the zebedee does not see the tann then the tann is unmolested. If the tann attempt the zebedee then the tann is not unmolested. If something attempt the zebedee and it is not unmolested then it is not nigerien. The zebedee is not unmolested.", "logic": "\nStargaze(tann, zebedee)\nStargaze(zebedee, tann)\nforall x (Attempt(x, zebedee) -> Stargaze(x, tann))\nMousse(zebedee, tann) -> not Knowing(tann)\nStargaze(tann, zebedee) -> Attempt(tann, zebedee)\nforall x (Attempt(x, zebedee) and Stargaze(x, tann) -> Mousse(zebedee, tann))\nforall x (Attempt(x, zebedee) and not Stargaze(x, zebedee) -> Stargaze(zebedee, tann))\nStargaze(zebedee, tann) and not Mousse(zebedee, tann) -> Unmolested(tann)\nAttempt(tann, zebedee) -> not Unmolested(tann)\nforall x (Attempt(x, zebedee) and not Unmolested(x) -> not Nigerien(x))\n\nnot Unmolested(zebedee)\n\nnot Unmolested(zebedee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The natassia flourish the lane. The lane flourish the natassia. If something extradite the lane then it flourish the natassia. If the lane niggle the natassia then the natassia is not libellous. If the natassia flourish the lane then the natassia extradite the lane. If something extradite the lane and it flourish the natassia then the lane niggle the natassia. If something extradite the lane and it does not visit the lane then the lane flourish the natassia. If the lane flourish the natassia and the lane does not see the natassia then the natassia is unbending. If the natassia extradite the lane then the natassia is not unbending. If something extradite the lane and it is not unbending then it is not perturbed. The natassia is green.", "logic": "\nFlourish(natassia, lane)\nFlourish(lane, natassia)\nforall x (Extradite(x, lane) -> Flourish(x, natassia))\nNiggle(lane, natassia) -> not Libellous(natassia)\nFlourish(natassia, lane) -> Extradite(natassia, lane)\nforall x (Extradite(x, lane) and Flourish(x, natassia) -> Niggle(lane, natassia))\nforall x (Extradite(x, lane) and not Flourish(x, lane) -> Flourish(lane, natassia))\nFlourish(lane, natassia) and not Niggle(lane, natassia) -> Unbending(natassia)\nExtradite(natassia, lane) -> not Unbending(natassia)\nforall x (Extradite(x, lane) and not Unbending(x) -> not Perturbed(x))\n\nGreen(natassia)\n\nGreen(natassia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The yankee yield the amelie. The shawnee banish the yankee. The amelie confect the shawnee. The colin confect the yankee. If something confect the shawnee and it yield the shawnee then the shawnee is undesired. If something is undesired and it banish the yankee then it is prolusory. If something yield the yankee and it banish the amelie then the amelie is uncouth. If the shawnee banish the amelie then the amelie yield the colin. If something yield the amelie then the amelie yield the shawnee. If something confect the amelie and it yield the shawnee then the amelie is uncouth. If something is aggravated and it confect the amelie then it yield the colin. If something is undesired and it yield the shawnee then the shawnee banish the yankee. The shawnee banish the yankee.", "logic": "\nYield(yankee, amelie)\nBanish(shawnee, yankee)\nConfect(amelie, shawnee)\nConfect(colin, yankee)\nforall x (Confect(x, shawnee) and Yield(x, shawnee) -> Undesired(shawnee))\nforall x (Undesired(x) and Banish(x, yankee) -> Prolusory(x))\nforall x (Yield(x, yankee) and Banish(x, amelie) -> Uncouth(amelie))\nBanish(shawnee, amelie) -> Yield(amelie, colin)\nforall x (Yield(x, amelie) -> Yield(amelie, shawnee))\nforall x (Confect(x, amelie) and Yield(x, shawnee) -> Uncouth(amelie))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) and Confect(x, amelie) -> Yield(x, colin))\nforall x (Undesired(x) and Yield(x, shawnee) -> Banish(shawnee, yankee))\n\nBanish(shawnee, yankee)\n\ntherefore Banish(shawnee, yankee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The sivert drape the una. The faustina degrease the sivert. The una disburden the faustina. The ronni disburden the sivert. If something disburden the faustina and it drape the faustina then the faustina is nipping. If something is nipping and it degrease the sivert then it is sounding. If something drape the sivert and it degrease the una then the una is complacent. If the faustina degrease the una then the una drape the ronni. If something drape the una then the una drape the faustina. If something disburden the una and it drape the faustina then the una is complacent. If something is mute and it disburden the una then it drape the ronni. If something is nipping and it drape the faustina then the faustina degrease the sivert. The faustina does not visit the sivert.", "logic": "\nDrape(sivert, una)\nDegrease(faustina, sivert)\nDisburden(una, faustina)\nDisburden(ronni, sivert)\nforall x (Disburden(x, faustina) and Drape(x, faustina) -> Nipping(faustina))\nforall x (Nipping(x) and Degrease(x, sivert) -> Sounding(x))\nforall x (Drape(x, sivert) and Degrease(x, una) -> Complacent(una))\nDegrease(faustina, una) -> Drape(una, ronni)\nforall x (Drape(x, una) -> Drape(una, faustina))\nforall x (Disburden(x, una) and Drape(x, faustina) -> Complacent(una))\nforall x (Mute(x) and Disburden(x, una) -> Drape(x, ronni))\nforall x (Nipping(x) and Drape(x, faustina) -> Degrease(faustina, sivert))\n\nnot Degrease(faustina, sivert)\n\ntherefore Degrease(faustina, sivert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The dasi bewhisker the rivalee. The farrah procreate the dasi. The rivalee redevelop the farrah. The oswell redevelop the dasi. If something redevelop the farrah and it bewhisker the farrah then the farrah is fortemente. If something is fortemente and it procreate the dasi then it is quiescent. If something bewhisker the dasi and it procreate the rivalee then the rivalee is motiveless. If the farrah procreate the rivalee then the rivalee bewhisker the oswell. If something bewhisker the rivalee then the rivalee bewhisker the farrah. If something redevelop the rivalee and it bewhisker the farrah then the rivalee is motiveless. If something is larboard and it redevelop the rivalee then it bewhisker the oswell. If something is fortemente and it bewhisker the farrah then the farrah procreate the dasi. The rivalee bewhisker the farrah.", "logic": "\nBewhisker(dasi, rivalee)\nProcreate(farrah, dasi)\nRedevelop(rivalee, farrah)\nRedevelop(oswell, dasi)\nforall x (Redevelop(x, farrah) and Bewhisker(x, farrah) -> Fortemente(farrah))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Procreate(x, dasi) -> Quiescent(x))\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, dasi) and Procreate(x, rivalee) -> Motiveless(rivalee))\nProcreate(farrah, rivalee) -> Bewhisker(rivalee, oswell)\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, rivalee) -> Bewhisker(rivalee, farrah))\nforall x (Redevelop(x, rivalee) and Bewhisker(x, farrah) -> Motiveless(rivalee))\nforall x (Larboard(x) and Redevelop(x, rivalee) -> Bewhisker(x, oswell))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Bewhisker(x, farrah) -> Procreate(farrah, dasi))\n\nBewhisker(rivalee, farrah)\n\nBewhisker(dasi, rivalee) and forall x (Bewhisker(x, rivalee) -> Bewhisker(rivalee, farrah)) -> therefore Bewhisker(rivalee, farrah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The madelle sieve the euphemia. The margret dispel the madelle. The euphemia parody the margret. The andriana parody the madelle. If something parody the margret and it sieve the margret then the margret is unfrosted. If something is unfrosted and it dispel the madelle then it is bitter. If something sieve the madelle and it dispel the euphemia then the euphemia is nonthermal. If the margret dispel the euphemia then the euphemia sieve the andriana. If something sieve the euphemia then the euphemia sieve the margret. If something parody the euphemia and it sieve the margret then the euphemia is nonthermal. If something is eighth and it parody the euphemia then it sieve the andriana. If something is unfrosted and it sieve the margret then the margret dispel the madelle. The euphemia does not need the margret.", "logic": "\nSieve(madelle, euphemia)\nDispel(margret, madelle)\nParody(euphemia, margret)\nParody(andriana, madelle)\nforall x (Parody(x, margret) and Sieve(x, margret) -> Unfrosted(margret))\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and Dispel(x, madelle) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Sieve(x, madelle) and Dispel(x, euphemia) -> Nonthermal(euphemia))\nDispel(margret, euphemia) -> Sieve(euphemia, andriana)\nforall x (Sieve(x, euphemia) -> Sieve(euphemia, margret))\nforall x (Parody(x, euphemia) and Sieve(x, margret) -> Nonthermal(euphemia))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Parody(x, euphemia) -> Sieve(x, andriana))\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and Sieve(x, margret) -> Dispel(margret, madelle))\n\nnot Sieve(euphemia, margret)\n\nSieve(madelle, euphemia) and forall x (Sieve(x, euphemia) -> Sieve(euphemia, margret)) -> therefore Sieve(euphemia, margret)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The kassandra fluoridise the arvie. The kassi knock the kassandra. The arvie worship the kassi. The marc worship the kassandra. If something worship the kassi and it fluoridise the kassi then the kassi is periodical. If something is periodical and it knock the kassandra then it is pinnatifid. If something fluoridise the kassandra and it knock the arvie then the arvie is pyrectic. If the kassi knock the arvie then the arvie fluoridise the marc. If something fluoridise the arvie then the arvie fluoridise the kassi. If something worship the arvie and it fluoridise the kassi then the arvie is pyrectic. If something is acropetal and it worship the arvie then it fluoridise the marc. If something is periodical and it fluoridise the kassi then the kassi knock the kassandra. The kassi is periodical.", "logic": "\nFluoridise(kassandra, arvie)\nKnock(kassi, kassandra)\nWorship(arvie, kassi)\nWorship(marc, kassandra)\nforall x (Worship(x, kassi) and Fluoridise(x, kassi) -> Periodical(kassi))\nforall x (Periodical(x) and Knock(x, kassandra) -> Pinnatifid(x))\nforall x (Fluoridise(x, kassandra) and Knock(x, arvie) -> Pyrectic(arvie))\nKnock(kassi, arvie) -> Fluoridise(arvie, marc)\nforall x (Fluoridise(x, arvie) -> Fluoridise(arvie, kassi))\nforall x (Worship(x, arvie) and Fluoridise(x, kassi) -> Pyrectic(arvie))\nforall x (Acropetal(x) and Worship(x, arvie) -> Fluoridise(x, marc))\nforall x (Periodical(x) and Fluoridise(x, kassi) -> Knock(kassi, kassandra))\n\nPeriodical(kassi)\n\nFluoridise(kassandra, arvie) and forall x (Fluoridise(x, arvie) -> Fluoridise(arvie, kassi)) -> therefore Fluoridise(arvie, kassi) Worship(arvie, kassi) and Fluoridise(arvie, kassi) and forall x (Worship(x, kassi) and Fluoridise(x, kassi) -> Periodical(kassi)) -> therefore Periodical(kassi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The marin bonk the warren. The flinn emend the marin. The warren decree the flinn. The eran decree the marin. If something decree the flinn and it bonk the flinn then the flinn is castrated. If something is castrated and it emend the marin then it is lukewarm. If something bonk the marin and it emend the warren then the warren is immediate. If the flinn emend the warren then the warren bonk the eran. If something bonk the warren then the warren bonk the flinn. If something decree the warren and it bonk the flinn then the warren is immediate. If something is serbian and it decree the warren then it bonk the eran. If something is castrated and it bonk the flinn then the flinn emend the marin. The flinn is not castrated.", "logic": "\nBonk(marin, warren)\nEmend(flinn, marin)\nDecree(warren, flinn)\nDecree(eran, marin)\nforall x (Decree(x, flinn) and Bonk(x, flinn) -> Castrated(flinn))\nforall x (Castrated(x) and Emend(x, marin) -> Lukewarm(x))\nforall x (Bonk(x, marin) and Emend(x, warren) -> Immediate(warren))\nEmend(flinn, warren) -> Bonk(warren, eran)\nforall x (Bonk(x, warren) -> Bonk(warren, flinn))\nforall x (Decree(x, warren) and Bonk(x, flinn) -> Immediate(warren))\nforall x (Serbian(x) and Decree(x, warren) -> Bonk(x, eran))\nforall x (Castrated(x) and Bonk(x, flinn) -> Emend(flinn, marin))\n\nnot Castrated(flinn)\n\nBonk(marin, warren) and forall x (Bonk(x, warren) -> Bonk(warren, flinn)) -> therefore Bonk(warren, flinn) Decree(warren, flinn) and Bonk(warren, flinn) and forall x (Decree(x, flinn) and Bonk(x, flinn) -> Castrated(flinn)) -> therefore Castrated(flinn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The manya diazotize the micah. The sheffy sully the manya. The micah deregulate the sheffy. The tailor deregulate the manya. If something deregulate the sheffy and it diazotize the sheffy then the sheffy is half. If something is half and it sully the manya then it is phonetic. If something diazotize the manya and it sully the micah then the micah is romanist. If the sheffy sully the micah then the micah diazotize the tailor. If something diazotize the micah then the micah diazotize the sheffy. If something deregulate the micah and it diazotize the sheffy then the micah is romanist. If something is luxurious and it deregulate the micah then it diazotize the tailor. If something is half and it diazotize the sheffy then the sheffy sully the manya. The sheffy is phonetic.", "logic": "\nDiazotize(manya, micah)\nSully(sheffy, manya)\nDeregulate(micah, sheffy)\nDeregulate(tailor, manya)\nforall x (Deregulate(x, sheffy) and Diazotize(x, sheffy) -> Half(sheffy))\nforall x (Half(x) and Sully(x, manya) -> Phonetic(x))\nforall x (Diazotize(x, manya) and Sully(x, micah) -> Romanist(micah))\nSully(sheffy, micah) -> Diazotize(micah, tailor)\nforall x (Diazotize(x, micah) -> Diazotize(micah, sheffy))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, micah) and Diazotize(x, sheffy) -> Romanist(micah))\nforall x (Luxurious(x) and Deregulate(x, micah) -> Diazotize(x, tailor))\nforall x (Half(x) and Diazotize(x, sheffy) -> Sully(sheffy, manya))\n\nPhonetic(sheffy)\n\nDiazotize(manya, micah) and forall x (Diazotize(x, micah) -> Diazotize(micah, sheffy)) -> therefore Diazotize(micah, sheffy) Deregulate(micah, sheffy) and Diazotize(micah, sheffy) and forall x (Deregulate(x, sheffy) and Diazotize(x, sheffy) -> Half(sheffy)) -> therefore Half(sheffy) Half(sheffy) and Sully(sheffy, manya) and forall x (Half(x) and Sully(x, manya) -> Phonetic(x)) -> therefore Phonetic(sheffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The merci crash the rayshell. The odessa vilipend the merci. The rayshell clench the odessa. The hortense clench the merci. If something clench the odessa and it crash the odessa then the odessa is annelid. If something is annelid and it vilipend the merci then it is stunted. If something crash the merci and it vilipend the rayshell then the rayshell is improvable. If the odessa vilipend the rayshell then the rayshell crash the hortense. If something crash the rayshell then the rayshell crash the odessa. If something clench the rayshell and it crash the odessa then the rayshell is improvable. If something is flavourous and it clench the rayshell then it crash the hortense. If something is annelid and it crash the odessa then the odessa vilipend the merci. The odessa is not stunted.", "logic": "\nCrash(merci, rayshell)\nVilipend(odessa, merci)\nClench(rayshell, odessa)\nClench(hortense, merci)\nforall x (Clench(x, odessa) and Crash(x, odessa) -> Annelid(odessa))\nforall x (Annelid(x) and Vilipend(x, merci) -> Stunted(x))\nforall x (Crash(x, merci) and Vilipend(x, rayshell) -> Improvable(rayshell))\nVilipend(odessa, rayshell) -> Crash(rayshell, hortense)\nforall x (Crash(x, rayshell) -> Crash(rayshell, odessa))\nforall x (Clench(x, rayshell) and Crash(x, odessa) -> Improvable(rayshell))\nforall x (Flavourous(x) and Clench(x, rayshell) -> Crash(x, hortense))\nforall x (Annelid(x) and Crash(x, odessa) -> Vilipend(odessa, merci))\n\nnot Stunted(odessa)\n\nCrash(merci, rayshell) and forall x (Crash(x, rayshell) -> Crash(rayshell, odessa)) -> therefore Crash(rayshell, odessa) Clench(rayshell, odessa) and Crash(rayshell, odessa) and forall x (Clench(x, odessa) and Crash(x, odessa) -> Annelid(odessa)) -> therefore Annelid(odessa) Annelid(odessa) and Vilipend(odessa, merci) and forall x (Annelid(x) and Vilipend(x, merci) -> Stunted(x)) -> therefore Stunted(odessa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The orelie shatter the julia. The kelsey fetter the orelie. The julia jangle the kelsey. The aloysius jangle the orelie. If something jangle the kelsey and it shatter the kelsey then the kelsey is diclinous. If something is diclinous and it fetter the orelie then it is draughty. If something shatter the orelie and it fetter the julia then the julia is hipped. If the kelsey fetter the julia then the julia shatter the aloysius. If something shatter the julia then the julia shatter the kelsey. If something jangle the julia and it shatter the kelsey then the julia is hipped. If something is alto and it jangle the julia then it shatter the aloysius. If something is diclinous and it shatter the kelsey then the kelsey fetter the orelie. The orelie is not draughty.", "logic": "\nShatter(orelie, julia)\nFetter(kelsey, orelie)\nJangle(julia, kelsey)\nJangle(aloysius, orelie)\nforall x (Jangle(x, kelsey) and Shatter(x, kelsey) -> Diclinous(kelsey))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) and Fetter(x, orelie) -> Draughty(x))\nforall x (Shatter(x, orelie) and Fetter(x, julia) -> Hipped(julia))\nFetter(kelsey, julia) -> Shatter(julia, aloysius)\nforall x (Shatter(x, julia) -> Shatter(julia, kelsey))\nforall x (Jangle(x, julia) and Shatter(x, kelsey) -> Hipped(julia))\nforall x (Alto(x) and Jangle(x, julia) -> Shatter(x, aloysius))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) and Shatter(x, kelsey) -> Fetter(kelsey, orelie))\n\nnot Draughty(orelie)\n\nforall x (Diclinous(x) and Fetter(x, orelie) -> Draughty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The kaile caress the moise. The magnum conjugate the kaile. The moise solder the magnum. The sandye solder the kaile. If something solder the magnum and it caress the magnum then the magnum is nonsocial. If something is nonsocial and it conjugate the kaile then it is grumous. If something caress the kaile and it conjugate the moise then the moise is manque. If the magnum conjugate the moise then the moise caress the sandye. If something caress the moise then the moise caress the magnum. If something solder the moise and it caress the magnum then the moise is manque. If something is aphanitic and it solder the moise then it caress the sandye. If something is nonsocial and it caress the magnum then the magnum conjugate the kaile. The sandye caress the sandye.", "logic": "\nCaress(kaile, moise)\nConjugate(magnum, kaile)\nSolder(moise, magnum)\nSolder(sandye, kaile)\nforall x (Solder(x, magnum) and Caress(x, magnum) -> Nonsocial(magnum))\nforall x (Nonsocial(x) and Conjugate(x, kaile) -> Grumous(x))\nforall x (Caress(x, kaile) and Conjugate(x, moise) -> Manque(moise))\nConjugate(magnum, moise) -> Caress(moise, sandye)\nforall x (Caress(x, moise) -> Caress(moise, magnum))\nforall x (Solder(x, moise) and Caress(x, magnum) -> Manque(moise))\nforall x (Aphanitic(x) and Solder(x, moise) -> Caress(x, sandye))\nforall x (Nonsocial(x) and Caress(x, magnum) -> Conjugate(magnum, kaile))\n\nCaress(sandye, sandye)\n\nforall x (Aphanitic(x) and Solder(x, moise) -> Caress(x, sandye)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The randell thurify the chaddie. The dorita nark the randell. The chaddie rival the dorita. The brier rival the randell. If something rival the dorita and it thurify the dorita then the dorita is feral. If something is feral and it nark the randell then it is pyramidal. If something thurify the randell and it nark the chaddie then the chaddie is westerly. If the dorita nark the chaddie then the chaddie thurify the brier. If something thurify the chaddie then the chaddie thurify the dorita. If something rival the chaddie and it thurify the dorita then the chaddie is westerly. If something is plucky and it rival the chaddie then it thurify the brier. If something is feral and it thurify the dorita then the dorita nark the randell. The brier is not pyramidal.", "logic": "\nThurify(randell, chaddie)\nNark(dorita, randell)\nRival(chaddie, dorita)\nRival(brier, randell)\nforall x (Rival(x, dorita) and Thurify(x, dorita) -> Feral(dorita))\nforall x (Feral(x) and Nark(x, randell) -> Pyramidal(x))\nforall x (Thurify(x, randell) and Nark(x, chaddie) -> Westerly(chaddie))\nNark(dorita, chaddie) -> Thurify(chaddie, brier)\nforall x (Thurify(x, chaddie) -> Thurify(chaddie, dorita))\nforall x (Rival(x, chaddie) and Thurify(x, dorita) -> Westerly(chaddie))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and Rival(x, chaddie) -> Thurify(x, brier))\nforall x (Feral(x) and Thurify(x, dorita) -> Nark(dorita, randell))\n\nnot Pyramidal(brier)\n\nforall x (Feral(x) and Nark(x, randell) -> Pyramidal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The harri traduce the avrit. The rudy bogey the harri. The avrit surmount the rudy. The elsie surmount the harri. If something surmount the rudy and it traduce the rudy then the rudy is horrified. If something is horrified and it bogey the harri then it is nonmoving. If something traduce the harri and it bogey the avrit then the avrit is unemployed. If the rudy bogey the avrit then the avrit traduce the elsie. If something traduce the avrit then the avrit traduce the rudy. If something surmount the avrit and it traduce the rudy then the avrit is unemployed. If something is negligible and it surmount the avrit then it traduce the elsie. If something is horrified and it traduce the rudy then the rudy bogey the harri. The avrit is nonmoving.", "logic": "\nTraduce(harri, avrit)\nBogey(rudy, harri)\nSurmount(avrit, rudy)\nSurmount(elsie, harri)\nforall x (Surmount(x, rudy) and Traduce(x, rudy) -> Horrified(rudy))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Bogey(x, harri) -> Nonmoving(x))\nforall x (Traduce(x, harri) and Bogey(x, avrit) -> Unemployed(avrit))\nBogey(rudy, avrit) -> Traduce(avrit, elsie)\nforall x (Traduce(x, avrit) -> Traduce(avrit, rudy))\nforall x (Surmount(x, avrit) and Traduce(x, rudy) -> Unemployed(avrit))\nforall x (Negligible(x) and Surmount(x, avrit) -> Traduce(x, elsie))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Traduce(x, rudy) -> Bogey(rudy, harri))\n\nNonmoving(avrit)\n\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Bogey(x, harri) -> Nonmoving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The lynna subdivide the terina. The andrea shoulder the lynna. The terina remount the andrea. The sebastien remount the lynna. If something remount the andrea and it subdivide the andrea then the andrea is cimmerian. If something is cimmerian and it shoulder the lynna then it is separated. If something subdivide the lynna and it shoulder the terina then the terina is bust. If the andrea shoulder the terina then the terina subdivide the sebastien. If something subdivide the terina then the terina subdivide the andrea. If something remount the terina and it subdivide the andrea then the terina is bust. If something is depressing and it remount the terina then it subdivide the sebastien. If something is cimmerian and it subdivide the andrea then the andrea shoulder the lynna. The terina does not chase the terina.", "logic": "\nSubdivide(lynna, terina)\nShoulder(andrea, lynna)\nRemount(terina, andrea)\nRemount(sebastien, lynna)\nforall x (Remount(x, andrea) and Subdivide(x, andrea) -> Cimmerian(andrea))\nforall x (Cimmerian(x) and Shoulder(x, lynna) -> Separated(x))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, lynna) and Shoulder(x, terina) -> Bust(terina))\nShoulder(andrea, terina) -> Subdivide(terina, sebastien)\nforall x (Subdivide(x, terina) -> Subdivide(terina, andrea))\nforall x (Remount(x, terina) and Subdivide(x, andrea) -> Bust(terina))\nforall x (Depressing(x) and Remount(x, terina) -> Subdivide(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Cimmerian(x) and Subdivide(x, andrea) -> Shoulder(andrea, lynna))\n\nnot Remount(terina, terina)\n\nnot Remount(terina, terina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The kiah bleep the greg. The sinclair peptize the kiah. The greg gather the sinclair. The raphael gather the kiah. If something gather the sinclair and it bleep the sinclair then the sinclair is inward. If something is inward and it peptize the kiah then it is judicable. If something bleep the kiah and it peptize the greg then the greg is gabonese. If the sinclair peptize the greg then the greg bleep the raphael. If something bleep the greg then the greg bleep the sinclair. If something gather the greg and it bleep the sinclair then the greg is gabonese. If something is insidious and it gather the greg then it bleep the raphael. If something is inward and it bleep the sinclair then the sinclair peptize the kiah. The raphael peptize the kiah.", "logic": "\nBleep(kiah, greg)\nPeptize(sinclair, kiah)\nGather(greg, sinclair)\nGather(raphael, kiah)\nforall x (Gather(x, sinclair) and Bleep(x, sinclair) -> Inward(sinclair))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Peptize(x, kiah) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Bleep(x, kiah) and Peptize(x, greg) -> Gabonese(greg))\nPeptize(sinclair, greg) -> Bleep(greg, raphael)\nforall x (Bleep(x, greg) -> Bleep(greg, sinclair))\nforall x (Gather(x, greg) and Bleep(x, sinclair) -> Gabonese(greg))\nforall x (Insidious(x) and Gather(x, greg) -> Bleep(x, raphael))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Bleep(x, sinclair) -> Peptize(sinclair, kiah))\n\nPeptize(raphael, kiah)\n\nPeptize(raphael, kiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The townie pardon the cinda. The sampson exert the townie. The cinda notarize the sampson. The enrique notarize the townie. If something notarize the sampson and it pardon the sampson then the sampson is cochlear. If something is cochlear and it exert the townie then it is colonized. If something pardon the townie and it exert the cinda then the cinda is breeding. If the sampson exert the cinda then the cinda pardon the enrique. If something pardon the cinda then the cinda pardon the sampson. If something notarize the cinda and it pardon the sampson then the cinda is breeding. If something is affiliated and it notarize the cinda then it pardon the enrique. If something is cochlear and it pardon the sampson then the sampson exert the townie. The sampson does not chase the cinda.", "logic": "\nPardon(townie, cinda)\nExert(sampson, townie)\nNotarize(cinda, sampson)\nNotarize(enrique, townie)\nforall x (Notarize(x, sampson) and Pardon(x, sampson) -> Cochlear(sampson))\nforall x (Cochlear(x) and Exert(x, townie) -> Colonized(x))\nforall x (Pardon(x, townie) and Exert(x, cinda) -> Breeding(cinda))\nExert(sampson, cinda) -> Pardon(cinda, enrique)\nforall x (Pardon(x, cinda) -> Pardon(cinda, sampson))\nforall x (Notarize(x, cinda) and Pardon(x, sampson) -> Breeding(cinda))\nforall x (Affiliated(x) and Notarize(x, cinda) -> Pardon(x, enrique))\nforall x (Cochlear(x) and Pardon(x, sampson) -> Exert(sampson, townie))\n\nnot Notarize(sampson, cinda)\n\nnot Notarize(sampson, cinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The alyse lyophilise the margie. The shelia tabularize the alyse. The margie situate the shelia. The raymund situate the alyse. If something situate the shelia and it lyophilise the shelia then the shelia is aweary. If something is aweary and it tabularize the alyse then it is ethnic. If something lyophilise the alyse and it tabularize the margie then the margie is unportable. If the shelia tabularize the margie then the margie lyophilise the raymund. If something lyophilise the margie then the margie lyophilise the shelia. If something situate the margie and it lyophilise the shelia then the margie is unportable. If something is impendent and it situate the margie then it lyophilise the raymund. If something is aweary and it lyophilise the shelia then the shelia tabularize the alyse. The margie tabularize the shelia.", "logic": "\nLyophilise(alyse, margie)\nTabularize(shelia, alyse)\nSituate(margie, shelia)\nSituate(raymund, alyse)\nforall x (Situate(x, shelia) and Lyophilise(x, shelia) -> Aweary(shelia))\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Tabularize(x, alyse) -> Ethnic(x))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, alyse) and Tabularize(x, margie) -> Unportable(margie))\nTabularize(shelia, margie) -> Lyophilise(margie, raymund)\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, margie) -> Lyophilise(margie, shelia))\nforall x (Situate(x, margie) and Lyophilise(x, shelia) -> Unportable(margie))\nforall x (Impendent(x) and Situate(x, margie) -> Lyophilise(x, raymund))\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Lyophilise(x, shelia) -> Tabularize(shelia, alyse))\n\nTabularize(margie, shelia)\n\nTabularize(margie, shelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "Blakeley is swagger. Blakeley is timorese. Blakeley is rigorous. Margalit is naturistic. Margalit is axenic. Margalit is timorese. Tadeas is plangent. Tadeas is rigorous. Renee is volatile. Renee is rigorous. If someone is swagger then they are timorese. Big people are swagger. If someone is volatile and rigorous then they are naturistic. Tadeas is plangent.", "logic": "\nSwagger(blakeley)\nTimorese(blakeley)\nRigorous(blakeley)\nNaturistic(margalit)\nAxenic(margalit)\nTimorese(margalit)\nPlangent(tadeas)\nRigorous(tadeas)\nVolatile(renee)\nRigorous(renee)\nforall x (Swagger(x) -> Timorese(x))\nforall x (Naturistic(x) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (Volatile(x) and Rigorous(x) -> Naturistic(x))\n\nPlangent(tadeas)\n\ntherefore Plangent(tadeas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Matty is festal. Matty is dramatic. Matty is declared. Merralee is visualized. Merralee is caustic. Merralee is dramatic. Cody is botryoidal. Cody is declared. Barbette is flyspeck. Barbette is declared. If someone is festal then they are dramatic. Big people are festal. If someone is flyspeck and declared then they are visualized. Cody is not botryoidal.", "logic": "\nFestal(matty)\nDramatic(matty)\nDeclared(matty)\nVisualized(merralee)\nCaustic(merralee)\nDramatic(merralee)\nBotryoidal(cody)\nDeclared(cody)\nFlyspeck(barbette)\nDeclared(barbette)\nforall x (Festal(x) -> Dramatic(x))\nforall x (Visualized(x) -> Festal(x))\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) and Declared(x) -> Visualized(x))\n\nnot Botryoidal(cody)\n\ntherefore Botryoidal(cody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Vivianne is barytic. Vivianne is countable. Vivianne is acanthoid. Idalia is controlled. Idalia is astral. Idalia is countable. Madge is hyperfine. Madge is acanthoid. Easter is webbed. Easter is acanthoid. If someone is barytic then they are countable. Big people are barytic. If someone is webbed and acanthoid then they are controlled. Idalia is barytic.", "logic": "\nBarytic(vivianne)\nCountable(vivianne)\nAcanthoid(vivianne)\nControlled(idalia)\nAstral(idalia)\nCountable(idalia)\nHyperfine(madge)\nAcanthoid(madge)\nWebbed(easter)\nAcanthoid(easter)\nforall x (Barytic(x) -> Countable(x))\nforall x (Controlled(x) -> Barytic(x))\nforall x (Webbed(x) and Acanthoid(x) -> Controlled(x))\n\nBarytic(idalia)\n\nControlled(idalia) and forall x (Controlled(x) -> Barytic(x)) -> therefore Barytic(idalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Angele is temporal. Angele is pugilistic. Angele is according. Adiana is inconstant. Adiana is brazen. Adiana is pugilistic. Lynna is charming. Lynna is according. Kirsteni is precative. Kirsteni is according. If someone is temporal then they are pugilistic. Big people are temporal. If someone is precative and according then they are inconstant. Kirsteni is not inconstant.", "logic": "\nTemporal(angele)\nPugilistic(angele)\nAccording(angele)\nInconstant(adiana)\nBrazen(adiana)\nPugilistic(adiana)\nCharming(lynna)\nAccording(lynna)\nPrecative(kirsteni)\nAccording(kirsteni)\nforall x (Temporal(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Inconstant(x) -> Temporal(x))\nforall x (Precative(x) and According(x) -> Inconstant(x))\n\nnot Inconstant(kirsteni)\n\nPrecative(kirsteni) and According(kirsteni) and forall x (Precative(x) and According(x) -> Inconstant(x)) -> therefore Inconstant(kirsteni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Laraine is crookback. Laraine is rostrate. Laraine is prolusory. Bentley is skirting. Bentley is sepulchral. Bentley is rostrate. Chauncey is incased. Chauncey is prolusory. Sloan is crossed. Sloan is prolusory. If someone is crookback then they are rostrate. Big people are crookback. If someone is crossed and prolusory then they are skirting. Sloan is crookback.", "logic": "\nCrookback(laraine)\nRostrate(laraine)\nProlusory(laraine)\nSkirting(bentley)\nSepulchral(bentley)\nRostrate(bentley)\nIncased(chauncey)\nProlusory(chauncey)\nCrossed(sloan)\nProlusory(sloan)\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Rostrate(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Crossed(x) and Prolusory(x) -> Skirting(x))\n\nCrookback(sloan)\n\nCrossed(sloan) and Prolusory(sloan) and forall x (Crossed(x) and Prolusory(x) -> Skirting(x)) -> therefore Skirting(sloan) Skirting(sloan) and forall x (Skirting(x) -> Crookback(x)) -> therefore Crookback(sloan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Jabez is soughing. Jabez is caducous. Jabez is phonic. Rozella is catabolic. Rozella is tumid. Rozella is caducous. Mahala is biographic. Mahala is phonic. Laureen is gloomy. Laureen is phonic. If someone is soughing then they are caducous. Big people are soughing. If someone is gloomy and phonic then they are catabolic. Laureen is not soughing.", "logic": "\nSoughing(jabez)\nCaducous(jabez)\nPhonic(jabez)\nCatabolic(rozella)\nTumid(rozella)\nCaducous(rozella)\nBiographic(mahala)\nPhonic(mahala)\nGloomy(laureen)\nPhonic(laureen)\nforall x (Soughing(x) -> Caducous(x))\nforall x (Catabolic(x) -> Soughing(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and Phonic(x) -> Catabolic(x))\n\nnot Soughing(laureen)\n\nGloomy(laureen) and Phonic(laureen) and forall x (Gloomy(x) and Phonic(x) -> Catabolic(x)) -> therefore Catabolic(laureen) Catabolic(laureen) and forall x (Catabolic(x) -> Soughing(x)) -> therefore Soughing(laureen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Aube is bald. Aube is spiffing. Aube is nescient. Lotta is nonhairy. Lotta is ataraxic. Lotta is spiffing. Padraig is wimpy. Padraig is nescient. Julianna is untaped. Julianna is nescient. If someone is bald then they are spiffing. Big people are bald. If someone is untaped and nescient then they are nonhairy. Julianna is spiffing.", "logic": "\nBald(aube)\nSpiffing(aube)\nNescient(aube)\nNonhairy(lotta)\nAtaraxic(lotta)\nSpiffing(lotta)\nWimpy(padraig)\nNescient(padraig)\nUntaped(julianna)\nNescient(julianna)\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Untaped(x) and Nescient(x) -> Nonhairy(x))\n\nSpiffing(julianna)\n\nUntaped(julianna) and Nescient(julianna) and forall x (Untaped(x) and Nescient(x) -> Nonhairy(x)) -> therefore Nonhairy(julianna) Nonhairy(julianna) and forall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Bald(x)) -> therefore Bald(julianna) Bald(julianna) and forall x (Bald(x) -> Spiffing(x)) -> therefore Spiffing(julianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Josiah is buttony. Josiah is mawkish. Josiah is grassless. Aimil is chestnut. Aimil is insincere. Aimil is mawkish. Rudolf is fertile. Rudolf is grassless. Caro is blockaded. Caro is grassless. If someone is buttony then they are mawkish. Big people are buttony. If someone is blockaded and grassless then they are chestnut. Caro is not mawkish.", "logic": "\nButtony(josiah)\nMawkish(josiah)\nGrassless(josiah)\nChestnut(aimil)\nInsincere(aimil)\nMawkish(aimil)\nFertile(rudolf)\nGrassless(rudolf)\nBlockaded(caro)\nGrassless(caro)\nforall x (Buttony(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Blockaded(x) and Grassless(x) -> Chestnut(x))\n\nnot Mawkish(caro)\n\nBlockaded(caro) and Grassless(caro) and forall x (Blockaded(x) and Grassless(x) -> Chestnut(x)) -> therefore Chestnut(caro) Chestnut(caro) and forall x (Chestnut(x) -> Buttony(x)) -> therefore Buttony(caro) Buttony(caro) and forall x (Buttony(x) -> Mawkish(x)) -> therefore Mawkish(caro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Margalit is managerial. Margalit is semite. Margalit is amok. Sanderson is causative. Sanderson is officious. Sanderson is semite. Albertine is sublunary. Albertine is amok. Mart is cairned. Mart is amok. If someone is managerial then they are semite. Big people are managerial. If someone is cairned and amok then they are causative. Albertine is not managerial.", "logic": "\nManagerial(margalit)\nSemite(margalit)\nAmok(margalit)\nCausative(sanderson)\nOfficious(sanderson)\nSemite(sanderson)\nSublunary(albertine)\nAmok(albertine)\nCairned(mart)\nAmok(mart)\nforall x (Managerial(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) -> Managerial(x))\nforall x (Cairned(x) and Amok(x) -> Causative(x))\n\nnot Managerial(albertine)\n\nforall x (Causative(x) -> Managerial(x)) <- forall x (Cairned(x) and Amok(x) -> Causative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Vin is pervious. Vin is upraised. Vin is afferent. Garcon is operant. Garcon is comforting. Garcon is upraised. Mary is sottish. Mary is afferent. Magdalene is soundless. Magdalene is afferent. If someone is pervious then they are upraised. Big people are pervious. If someone is soundless and afferent then they are operant. Vin is operant.", "logic": "\nPervious(vin)\nUpraised(vin)\nAfferent(vin)\nOperant(garcon)\nComforting(garcon)\nUpraised(garcon)\nSottish(mary)\nAfferent(mary)\nSoundless(magdalene)\nAfferent(magdalene)\nforall x (Pervious(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Operant(x) -> Pervious(x))\nforall x (Soundless(x) and Afferent(x) -> Operant(x))\n\nOperant(vin)\n\nforall x (Soundless(x) and Afferent(x) -> Operant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Leesa is coniferous. Leesa is wedged. Leesa is etched. Micky is waggish. Micky is fraught. Micky is wedged. Lazlo is lacerated. Lazlo is etched. Moina is unmeasured. Moina is etched. If someone is coniferous then they are wedged. Big people are coniferous. If someone is unmeasured and etched then they are waggish. Lazlo is not wedged.", "logic": "\nConiferous(leesa)\nWedged(leesa)\nEtched(leesa)\nWaggish(micky)\nFraught(micky)\nWedged(micky)\nLacerated(lazlo)\nEtched(lazlo)\nUnmeasured(moina)\nEtched(moina)\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> Wedged(x))\nforall x (Waggish(x) -> Coniferous(x))\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) and Etched(x) -> Waggish(x))\n\nnot Wedged(lazlo)\n\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> Wedged(x)) <- forall x (Waggish(x) -> Coniferous(x)) <- forall x (Unmeasured(x) and Etched(x) -> Waggish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Justina is unrimed. Justina is tempered. Justina is federate. Reta is smothered. Reta is minuscular. Reta is tempered. Nicola is tuberous. Nicola is federate. Travis is regal. Travis is federate. If someone is unrimed then they are tempered. Big people are unrimed. If someone is regal and federate then they are smothered. Nicola is smothered.", "logic": "\nUnrimed(justina)\nTempered(justina)\nFederate(justina)\nSmothered(reta)\nMinuscular(reta)\nTempered(reta)\nTuberous(nicola)\nFederate(nicola)\nRegal(travis)\nFederate(travis)\nforall x (Unrimed(x) -> Tempered(x))\nforall x (Smothered(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nforall x (Regal(x) and Federate(x) -> Smothered(x))\n\nSmothered(nicola)\n\nforall x (Regal(x) and Federate(x) -> Smothered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Danella is soled. Danella is getable. Danella is buckshee. Bernete is garlicky. Bernete is sedative. Bernete is getable. Harlin is jeweled. Harlin is buckshee. Liliane is diabetic. Liliane is buckshee. If someone is soled then they are getable. Big people are soled. If someone is diabetic and buckshee then they are garlicky. Danella is not sedative.", "logic": "\nSoled(danella)\nGetable(danella)\nBuckshee(danella)\nGarlicky(bernete)\nSedative(bernete)\nGetable(bernete)\nJeweled(harlin)\nBuckshee(harlin)\nDiabetic(liliane)\nBuckshee(liliane)\nforall x (Soled(x) -> Getable(x))\nforall x (Garlicky(x) -> Soled(x))\nforall x (Diabetic(x) and Buckshee(x) -> Garlicky(x))\n\nnot Sedative(danella)\n\nnot Sedative(danella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Celinka is delicate. Celinka is mastoidal. Celinka is scattered. Marten is tenor. Marten is censurable. Marten is mastoidal. Linnell is despairing. Linnell is scattered. Vanny is chthonic. Vanny is scattered. If someone is delicate then they are mastoidal. Big people are delicate. If someone is chthonic and scattered then they are tenor. Celinka is despairing.", "logic": "\nDelicate(celinka)\nMastoidal(celinka)\nScattered(celinka)\nTenor(marten)\nCensurable(marten)\nMastoidal(marten)\nDespairing(linnell)\nScattered(linnell)\nChthonic(vanny)\nScattered(vanny)\nforall x (Delicate(x) -> Mastoidal(x))\nforall x (Tenor(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Chthonic(x) and Scattered(x) -> Tenor(x))\n\nDespairing(celinka)\n\nDespairing(celinka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Rolando is rich. Rolando is arthralgic. Rolando is subsidiary. Miguelita is scopal. Miguelita is sottish. Miguelita is arthralgic. Wini is onomastic. Wini is subsidiary. Bessie is proustian. Bessie is subsidiary. If someone is rich then they are arthralgic. Big people are rich. If someone is proustian and subsidiary then they are scopal. Miguelita is not onomastic.", "logic": "\nRich(rolando)\nArthralgic(rolando)\nSubsidiary(rolando)\nScopal(miguelita)\nSottish(miguelita)\nArthralgic(miguelita)\nOnomastic(wini)\nSubsidiary(wini)\nProustian(bessie)\nSubsidiary(bessie)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Arthralgic(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> Rich(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) and Subsidiary(x) -> Scopal(x))\n\nnot Onomastic(miguelita)\n\nnot Onomastic(miguelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Allan is yemeni. Allan is emended. Allan is cypriot. Eustace is snarled. Eustace is protruding. Eustace is emended. Clementia is exoergic. Clementia is cypriot. Pietro is brattish. Pietro is cypriot. If someone is yemeni then they are emended. Big people are yemeni. If someone is brattish and cypriot then they are snarled. Clementia is brattish.", "logic": "\nYemeni(allan)\nEmended(allan)\nCypriot(allan)\nSnarled(eustace)\nProtruding(eustace)\nEmended(eustace)\nExoergic(clementia)\nCypriot(clementia)\nBrattish(pietro)\nCypriot(pietro)\nforall x (Yemeni(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Snarled(x) -> Yemeni(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) and Cypriot(x) -> Snarled(x))\n\nBrattish(clementia)\n\nBrattish(clementia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "The ryann is not side. The jude sigh the ryann. The jude skim the ryann. All deadening people are stumpy. If the ryann is bogus then the ryann skim the jude. If someone sigh the ryann then the ryann skim the jude. If someone is bogus and stumpy then they need the jude. If the ryann skim the jude then the ryann wire the jude. If someone wire the jude then they need the ryann. If someone sigh the jude and they are stumpy then they see the ryann. If someone sigh the jude and the jude wire the ryann then they are not side. The ryann is not side.", "logic": "\nnot Side(ryann)\nSigh(jude, ryann)\nSkim(jude, ryann)\nforall x (Deadening(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nBogus(ryann) -> Skim(ryann, jude)\nforall x (Sigh(x, ryann) -> Skim(ryann, jude))\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Stumpy(x) -> Wire(x, jude))\nSkim(ryann, jude) -> Wire(ryann, jude)\nforall x (Wire(x, jude) -> Wire(x, ryann))\nforall x (Sigh(x, jude) and Stumpy(x) -> Skim(x, ryann))\nforall x (Sigh(x, jude) and Wire(jude, ryann) -> not Side(x))\n\nnot Side(ryann)\n\ntherefore not Side(ryann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The baird is not luculent. The burke deject the baird. The burke tape the baird. All puckish people are culpable. If the baird is papillate then the baird tape the burke. If someone deject the baird then the baird tape the burke. If someone is papillate and culpable then they need the burke. If the baird tape the burke then the baird surtax the burke. If someone surtax the burke then they need the baird. If someone deject the burke and they are culpable then they see the baird. If someone deject the burke and the burke surtax the baird then they are not luculent. The baird is luculent.", "logic": "\nnot Luculent(baird)\nDeject(burke, baird)\nTape(burke, baird)\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Culpable(x))\nPapillate(baird) -> Tape(baird, burke)\nforall x (Deject(x, baird) -> Tape(baird, burke))\nforall x (Papillate(x) and Culpable(x) -> Surtax(x, burke))\nTape(baird, burke) -> Surtax(baird, burke)\nforall x (Surtax(x, burke) -> Surtax(x, baird))\nforall x (Deject(x, burke) and Culpable(x) -> Tape(x, baird))\nforall x (Deject(x, burke) and Surtax(burke, baird) -> not Luculent(x))\n\nLuculent(baird)\n\ntherefore not Luculent(baird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The sophie is not panegyric. The min disburse the sophie. The min kite the sophie. All vulturine people are anchoritic. If the sophie is franciscan then the sophie kite the min. If someone disburse the sophie then the sophie kite the min. If someone is franciscan and anchoritic then they need the min. If the sophie kite the min then the sophie secularize the min. If someone secularize the min then they need the sophie. If someone disburse the min and they are anchoritic then they see the sophie. If someone disburse the min and the min secularize the sophie then they are not panegyric. The sophie kite the min.", "logic": "\nnot Panegyric(sophie)\nDisburse(min, sophie)\nKite(min, sophie)\nforall x (Vulturine(x) -> Anchoritic(x))\nFranciscan(sophie) -> Kite(sophie, min)\nforall x (Disburse(x, sophie) -> Kite(sophie, min))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) and Anchoritic(x) -> Secularize(x, min))\nKite(sophie, min) -> Secularize(sophie, min)\nforall x (Secularize(x, min) -> Secularize(x, sophie))\nforall x (Disburse(x, min) and Anchoritic(x) -> Kite(x, sophie))\nforall x (Disburse(x, min) and Secularize(min, sophie) -> not Panegyric(x))\n\nKite(sophie, min)\n\nDisburse(min, sophie) and forall x (Disburse(x, sophie) -> Kite(sophie, min)) -> therefore Kite(sophie, min)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The shurlock is not nonionised. The lebbie avianize the shurlock. The lebbie unbridle the shurlock. All epiphytic people are esthetic. If the shurlock is overland then the shurlock unbridle the lebbie. If someone avianize the shurlock then the shurlock unbridle the lebbie. If someone is overland and esthetic then they need the lebbie. If the shurlock unbridle the lebbie then the shurlock derestrict the lebbie. If someone derestrict the lebbie then they need the shurlock. If someone avianize the lebbie and they are esthetic then they see the shurlock. If someone avianize the lebbie and the lebbie derestrict the shurlock then they are not nonionised. The shurlock does not see the lebbie.", "logic": "\nnot Nonionised(shurlock)\nAvianize(lebbie, shurlock)\nUnbridle(lebbie, shurlock)\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) -> Esthetic(x))\nOverland(shurlock) -> Unbridle(shurlock, lebbie)\nforall x (Avianize(x, shurlock) -> Unbridle(shurlock, lebbie))\nforall x (Overland(x) and Esthetic(x) -> Derestrict(x, lebbie))\nUnbridle(shurlock, lebbie) -> Derestrict(shurlock, lebbie)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, lebbie) -> Derestrict(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Avianize(x, lebbie) and Esthetic(x) -> Unbridle(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Avianize(x, lebbie) and Derestrict(lebbie, shurlock) -> not Nonionised(x))\n\nnot Unbridle(shurlock, lebbie)\n\nAvianize(lebbie, shurlock) and forall x (Avianize(x, shurlock) -> Unbridle(shurlock, lebbie)) -> therefore Unbridle(shurlock, lebbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The emmery is not uncomplete. The filia decline the emmery. The filia claret the emmery. All amused people are dysphoric. If the emmery is prussian then the emmery claret the filia. If someone decline the emmery then the emmery claret the filia. If someone is prussian and dysphoric then they need the filia. If the emmery claret the filia then the emmery garb the filia. If someone garb the filia then they need the emmery. If someone decline the filia and they are dysphoric then they see the emmery. If someone decline the filia and the filia garb the emmery then they are not uncomplete. The emmery garb the filia.", "logic": "\nnot Uncomplete(emmery)\nDecline(filia, emmery)\nClaret(filia, emmery)\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Dysphoric(x))\nPrussian(emmery) -> Claret(emmery, filia)\nforall x (Decline(x, emmery) -> Claret(emmery, filia))\nforall x (Prussian(x) and Dysphoric(x) -> Garb(x, filia))\nClaret(emmery, filia) -> Garb(emmery, filia)\nforall x (Garb(x, filia) -> Garb(x, emmery))\nforall x (Decline(x, filia) and Dysphoric(x) -> Claret(x, emmery))\nforall x (Decline(x, filia) and Garb(filia, emmery) -> not Uncomplete(x))\n\nGarb(emmery, filia)\n\nDecline(filia, emmery) and forall x (Decline(x, emmery) -> Claret(emmery, filia)) -> therefore Claret(emmery, filia) Claret(emmery, filia) and Claret(emmery, filia) -> Garb(emmery, filia) -> therefore Garb(emmery, filia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The patricio is not randomised. The suzan harp the patricio. The suzan photostat the patricio. All tuxedoed people are unframed. If the patricio is occlusive then the patricio photostat the suzan. If someone harp the patricio then the patricio photostat the suzan. If someone is occlusive and unframed then they need the suzan. If the patricio photostat the suzan then the patricio entwine the suzan. If someone entwine the suzan then they need the patricio. If someone harp the suzan and they are unframed then they see the patricio. If someone harp the suzan and the suzan entwine the patricio then they are not randomised. The patricio does not need the suzan.", "logic": "\nnot Randomised(patricio)\nHarp(suzan, patricio)\nPhotostat(suzan, patricio)\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> Unframed(x))\nOcclusive(patricio) -> Photostat(patricio, suzan)\nforall x (Harp(x, patricio) -> Photostat(patricio, suzan))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Unframed(x) -> Entwine(x, suzan))\nPhotostat(patricio, suzan) -> Entwine(patricio, suzan)\nforall x (Entwine(x, suzan) -> Entwine(x, patricio))\nforall x (Harp(x, suzan) and Unframed(x) -> Photostat(x, patricio))\nforall x (Harp(x, suzan) and Entwine(suzan, patricio) -> not Randomised(x))\n\nnot Entwine(patricio, suzan)\n\nHarp(suzan, patricio) and forall x (Harp(x, patricio) -> Photostat(patricio, suzan)) -> therefore Photostat(patricio, suzan) Photostat(patricio, suzan) and Photostat(patricio, suzan) -> Entwine(patricio, suzan) -> therefore Entwine(patricio, suzan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The iggy is not nubile. The pedro confection the iggy. The pedro saunter the iggy. All flooded people are eparchial. If the iggy is oaken then the iggy saunter the pedro. If someone confection the iggy then the iggy saunter the pedro. If someone is oaken and eparchial then they need the pedro. If the iggy saunter the pedro then the iggy pride the pedro. If someone pride the pedro then they need the iggy. If someone confection the pedro and they are eparchial then they see the iggy. If someone confection the pedro and the pedro pride the iggy then they are not nubile. The iggy pride the iggy.", "logic": "\nnot Nubile(iggy)\nConfection(pedro, iggy)\nSaunter(pedro, iggy)\nforall x (Flooded(x) -> Eparchial(x))\nOaken(iggy) -> Saunter(iggy, pedro)\nforall x (Confection(x, iggy) -> Saunter(iggy, pedro))\nforall x (Oaken(x) and Eparchial(x) -> Pride(x, pedro))\nSaunter(iggy, pedro) -> Pride(iggy, pedro)\nforall x (Pride(x, pedro) -> Pride(x, iggy))\nforall x (Confection(x, pedro) and Eparchial(x) -> Saunter(x, iggy))\nforall x (Confection(x, pedro) and Pride(pedro, iggy) -> not Nubile(x))\n\nPride(iggy, iggy)\n\nConfection(pedro, iggy) and forall x (Confection(x, iggy) -> Saunter(iggy, pedro)) -> therefore Saunter(iggy, pedro) Saunter(iggy, pedro) and Saunter(iggy, pedro) -> Pride(iggy, pedro) -> therefore Pride(iggy, pedro) Pride(iggy, pedro) and forall x (Pride(x, pedro) -> Pride(x, iggy)) -> therefore Pride(iggy, iggy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The katheleen is not relaxant. The melessa brand the katheleen. The melessa actualize the katheleen. All huxleyan people are nonimmune. If the katheleen is lipless then the katheleen actualize the melessa. If someone brand the katheleen then the katheleen actualize the melessa. If someone is lipless and nonimmune then they need the melessa. If the katheleen actualize the melessa then the katheleen address the melessa. If someone address the melessa then they need the katheleen. If someone brand the melessa and they are nonimmune then they see the katheleen. If someone brand the melessa and the melessa address the katheleen then they are not relaxant. The katheleen does not need the katheleen.", "logic": "\nnot Relaxant(katheleen)\nBrand(melessa, katheleen)\nActualize(melessa, katheleen)\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\nLipless(katheleen) -> Actualize(katheleen, melessa)\nforall x (Brand(x, katheleen) -> Actualize(katheleen, melessa))\nforall x (Lipless(x) and Nonimmune(x) -> Address(x, melessa))\nActualize(katheleen, melessa) -> Address(katheleen, melessa)\nforall x (Address(x, melessa) -> Address(x, katheleen))\nforall x (Brand(x, melessa) and Nonimmune(x) -> Actualize(x, katheleen))\nforall x (Brand(x, melessa) and Address(melessa, katheleen) -> not Relaxant(x))\n\nnot Address(katheleen, katheleen)\n\nBrand(melessa, katheleen) and forall x (Brand(x, katheleen) -> Actualize(katheleen, melessa)) -> therefore Actualize(katheleen, melessa) Actualize(katheleen, melessa) and Actualize(katheleen, melessa) -> Address(katheleen, melessa) -> therefore Address(katheleen, melessa) Address(katheleen, melessa) and forall x (Address(x, melessa) -> Address(x, katheleen)) -> therefore Address(katheleen, katheleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The franky is not humourous. The darell deduce the franky. The darell escalade the franky. All motivative people are deserved. If the franky is maleficent then the franky escalade the darell. If someone deduce the franky then the franky escalade the darell. If someone is maleficent and deserved then they need the darell. If the franky escalade the darell then the franky gaol the darell. If someone gaol the darell then they need the franky. If someone deduce the darell and they are deserved then they see the franky. If someone deduce the darell and the darell gaol the franky then they are not humourous. The darell does not need the franky.", "logic": "\nnot Humourous(franky)\nDeduce(darell, franky)\nEscalade(darell, franky)\nforall x (Motivative(x) -> Deserved(x))\nMaleficent(franky) -> Escalade(franky, darell)\nforall x (Deduce(x, franky) -> Escalade(franky, darell))\nforall x (Maleficent(x) and Deserved(x) -> Gaol(x, darell))\nEscalade(franky, darell) -> Gaol(franky, darell)\nforall x (Gaol(x, darell) -> Gaol(x, franky))\nforall x (Deduce(x, darell) and Deserved(x) -> Escalade(x, franky))\nforall x (Deduce(x, darell) and Gaol(darell, franky) -> not Humourous(x))\n\nnot Gaol(darell, franky)\n\nforall x (Gaol(x, darell) -> Gaol(x, franky)) <- forall x (Maleficent(x) and Deserved(x) -> Gaol(x, darell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The latrina is not awny. The maddalena startle the latrina. The maddalena scoot the latrina. All honorable people are tantric. If the latrina is smoothened then the latrina scoot the maddalena. If someone startle the latrina then the latrina scoot the maddalena. If someone is smoothened and tantric then they need the maddalena. If the latrina scoot the maddalena then the latrina canalize the maddalena. If someone canalize the maddalena then they need the latrina. If someone startle the maddalena and they are tantric then they see the latrina. If someone startle the maddalena and the maddalena canalize the latrina then they are not awny. The maddalena canalize the maddalena.", "logic": "\nnot Awny(latrina)\nStartle(maddalena, latrina)\nScoot(maddalena, latrina)\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Tantric(x))\nSmoothened(latrina) -> Scoot(latrina, maddalena)\nforall x (Startle(x, latrina) -> Scoot(latrina, maddalena))\nforall x (Smoothened(x) and Tantric(x) -> Canalize(x, maddalena))\nScoot(latrina, maddalena) -> Canalize(latrina, maddalena)\nforall x (Canalize(x, maddalena) -> Canalize(x, latrina))\nforall x (Startle(x, maddalena) and Tantric(x) -> Scoot(x, latrina))\nforall x (Startle(x, maddalena) and Canalize(maddalena, latrina) -> not Awny(x))\n\nCanalize(maddalena, maddalena)\n\nforall x (Smoothened(x) and Tantric(x) -> Canalize(x, maddalena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The tine is not startling. The gabie attire the tine. The gabie reheel the tine. All avid people are insane. If the tine is beadlike then the tine reheel the gabie. If someone attire the tine then the tine reheel the gabie. If someone is beadlike and insane then they need the gabie. If the tine reheel the gabie then the tine whisk the gabie. If someone whisk the gabie then they need the tine. If someone attire the gabie and they are insane then they see the tine. If someone attire the gabie and the gabie whisk the tine then they are not startling. The gabie is not insane.", "logic": "\nnot Startling(tine)\nAttire(gabie, tine)\nReheel(gabie, tine)\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Insane(x))\nBeadlike(tine) -> Reheel(tine, gabie)\nforall x (Attire(x, tine) -> Reheel(tine, gabie))\nforall x (Beadlike(x) and Insane(x) -> Whisk(x, gabie))\nReheel(tine, gabie) -> Whisk(tine, gabie)\nforall x (Whisk(x, gabie) -> Whisk(x, tine))\nforall x (Attire(x, gabie) and Insane(x) -> Reheel(x, tine))\nforall x (Attire(x, gabie) and Whisk(gabie, tine) -> not Startling(x))\n\nnot Insane(gabie)\n\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Insane(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The jill is not amebic. The alane cronk the jill. The alane scuffle the jill. All mediaeval people are heartless. If the jill is brisant then the jill scuffle the alane. If someone cronk the jill then the jill scuffle the alane. If someone is brisant and heartless then they need the alane. If the jill scuffle the alane then the jill discover the alane. If someone discover the alane then they need the jill. If someone cronk the alane and they are heartless then they see the jill. If someone cronk the alane and the alane discover the jill then they are not amebic. The jill is heartless.", "logic": "\nnot Amebic(jill)\nCronk(alane, jill)\nScuffle(alane, jill)\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) -> Heartless(x))\nBrisant(jill) -> Scuffle(jill, alane)\nforall x (Cronk(x, jill) -> Scuffle(jill, alane))\nforall x (Brisant(x) and Heartless(x) -> Discover(x, alane))\nScuffle(jill, alane) -> Discover(jill, alane)\nforall x (Discover(x, alane) -> Discover(x, jill))\nforall x (Cronk(x, alane) and Heartless(x) -> Scuffle(x, jill))\nforall x (Cronk(x, alane) and Discover(alane, jill) -> not Amebic(x))\n\nHeartless(jill)\n\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) -> Heartless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The otho is not harmonious. The reed prod the otho. The reed impoverish the otho. All umbellate people are flattering. If the otho is clawed then the otho impoverish the reed. If someone prod the otho then the otho impoverish the reed. If someone is clawed and flattering then they need the reed. If the otho impoverish the reed then the otho prepay the reed. If someone prepay the reed then they need the otho. If someone prod the reed and they are flattering then they see the otho. If someone prod the reed and the reed prepay the otho then they are not harmonious. The reed is not umbellate.", "logic": "\nnot Harmonious(otho)\nProd(reed, otho)\nImpoverish(reed, otho)\nforall x (Umbellate(x) -> Flattering(x))\nClawed(otho) -> Impoverish(otho, reed)\nforall x (Prod(x, otho) -> Impoverish(otho, reed))\nforall x (Clawed(x) and Flattering(x) -> Prepay(x, reed))\nImpoverish(otho, reed) -> Prepay(otho, reed)\nforall x (Prepay(x, reed) -> Prepay(x, otho))\nforall x (Prod(x, reed) and Flattering(x) -> Impoverish(x, otho))\nforall x (Prod(x, reed) and Prepay(reed, otho) -> not Harmonious(x))\n\nnot Umbellate(reed)\n\nnot Umbellate(reed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The mylo is not estranged. The guendolen blunder the mylo. The guendolen repugn the mylo. All punctual people are droll. If the mylo is peltate then the mylo repugn the guendolen. If someone blunder the mylo then the mylo repugn the guendolen. If someone is peltate and droll then they need the guendolen. If the mylo repugn the guendolen then the mylo drop the guendolen. If someone drop the guendolen then they need the mylo. If someone blunder the guendolen and they are droll then they see the mylo. If someone blunder the guendolen and the guendolen drop the mylo then they are not estranged. The guendolen repugn the guendolen.", "logic": "\nnot Estranged(mylo)\nBlunder(guendolen, mylo)\nRepugn(guendolen, mylo)\nforall x (Punctual(x) -> Droll(x))\nPeltate(mylo) -> Repugn(mylo, guendolen)\nforall x (Blunder(x, mylo) -> Repugn(mylo, guendolen))\nforall x (Peltate(x) and Droll(x) -> Drop(x, guendolen))\nRepugn(mylo, guendolen) -> Drop(mylo, guendolen)\nforall x (Drop(x, guendolen) -> Drop(x, mylo))\nforall x (Blunder(x, guendolen) and Droll(x) -> Repugn(x, mylo))\nforall x (Blunder(x, guendolen) and Drop(guendolen, mylo) -> not Estranged(x))\n\nRepugn(guendolen, guendolen)\n\nRepugn(guendolen, guendolen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The marten is not voidable. The lorry jimmy the marten. The lorry deny the marten. All absent people are bicolour. If the marten is unipolar then the marten deny the lorry. If someone jimmy the marten then the marten deny the lorry. If someone is unipolar and bicolour then they need the lorry. If the marten deny the lorry then the marten euphemise the lorry. If someone euphemise the lorry then they need the marten. If someone jimmy the lorry and they are bicolour then they see the marten. If someone jimmy the lorry and the lorry euphemise the marten then they are not voidable. The lorry is not unipolar.", "logic": "\nnot Voidable(marten)\nJimmy(lorry, marten)\nDeny(lorry, marten)\nforall x (Absent(x) -> Bicolour(x))\nUnipolar(marten) -> Deny(marten, lorry)\nforall x (Jimmy(x, marten) -> Deny(marten, lorry))\nforall x (Unipolar(x) and Bicolour(x) -> Euphemise(x, lorry))\nDeny(marten, lorry) -> Euphemise(marten, lorry)\nforall x (Euphemise(x, lorry) -> Euphemise(x, marten))\nforall x (Jimmy(x, lorry) and Bicolour(x) -> Deny(x, marten))\nforall x (Jimmy(x, lorry) and Euphemise(lorry, marten) -> not Voidable(x))\n\nnot Unipolar(lorry)\n\nnot Unipolar(lorry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The tomasina is not cellular. The elwina topple the tomasina. The elwina escallop the tomasina. All apocarpous people are bereft. If the tomasina is cocksure then the tomasina escallop the elwina. If someone topple the tomasina then the tomasina escallop the elwina. If someone is cocksure and bereft then they need the elwina. If the tomasina escallop the elwina then the tomasina patter the elwina. If someone patter the elwina then they need the tomasina. If someone topple the elwina and they are bereft then they see the tomasina. If someone topple the elwina and the elwina patter the tomasina then they are not cellular. The elwina is cellular.", "logic": "\nnot Cellular(tomasina)\nTopple(elwina, tomasina)\nEscallop(elwina, tomasina)\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Bereft(x))\nCocksure(tomasina) -> Escallop(tomasina, elwina)\nforall x (Topple(x, tomasina) -> Escallop(tomasina, elwina))\nforall x (Cocksure(x) and Bereft(x) -> Patter(x, elwina))\nEscallop(tomasina, elwina) -> Patter(tomasina, elwina)\nforall x (Patter(x, elwina) -> Patter(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Topple(x, elwina) and Bereft(x) -> Escallop(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Topple(x, elwina) and Patter(elwina, tomasina) -> not Cellular(x))\n\nCellular(elwina)\n\nCellular(elwina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The ree rumba the adel. The ree sterilise the adel. The adel sterilise the ree. If someone sterilise the adel and the adel rumba the ree then the adel sterilise the ree. If someone incase the adel then they are rimose. If the ree incase the adel then the adel rumba the ree. If someone rumba the adel and the adel incase the ree then the ree incase the adel. If someone sterilise the adel then the adel incase the ree. If someone sterilise the ree then they eat the ree. The adel sterilise the ree.", "logic": "\nRumba(ree, adel)\nSterilise(ree, adel)\nSterilise(adel, ree)\nforall x (Sterilise(x, adel) and Rumba(adel, ree) -> Sterilise(adel, ree))\nforall x (Incase(x, adel) -> Rimose(x))\nIncase(ree, adel) -> Rumba(adel, ree)\nforall x (Rumba(x, adel) and Incase(adel, ree) -> Incase(ree, adel))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, adel) -> Incase(adel, ree))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, ree) -> Rumba(x, ree))\n\nSterilise(adel, ree)\n\ntherefore Sterilise(adel, ree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The adrick suntan the karlyn. The adrick phrase the karlyn. The karlyn phrase the adrick. If someone phrase the karlyn and the karlyn suntan the adrick then the karlyn phrase the adrick. If someone unclothe the karlyn then they are abroach. If the adrick unclothe the karlyn then the karlyn suntan the adrick. If someone suntan the karlyn and the karlyn unclothe the adrick then the adrick unclothe the karlyn. If someone phrase the karlyn then the karlyn unclothe the adrick. If someone phrase the adrick then they eat the adrick. The adrick does not see the karlyn.", "logic": "\nSuntan(adrick, karlyn)\nPhrase(adrick, karlyn)\nPhrase(karlyn, adrick)\nforall x (Phrase(x, karlyn) and Suntan(karlyn, adrick) -> Phrase(karlyn, adrick))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, karlyn) -> Abroach(x))\nUnclothe(adrick, karlyn) -> Suntan(karlyn, adrick)\nforall x (Suntan(x, karlyn) and Unclothe(karlyn, adrick) -> Unclothe(adrick, karlyn))\nforall x (Phrase(x, karlyn) -> Unclothe(karlyn, adrick))\nforall x (Phrase(x, adrick) -> Suntan(x, adrick))\n\nnot Phrase(adrick, karlyn)\n\ntherefore Phrase(adrick, karlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The brian roar the violante. The brian steamroll the violante. The violante steamroll the brian. If someone steamroll the violante and the violante roar the brian then the violante steamroll the brian. If someone beautify the violante then they are butyric. If the brian beautify the violante then the violante roar the brian. If someone roar the violante and the violante beautify the brian then the brian beautify the violante. If someone steamroll the violante then the violante beautify the brian. If someone steamroll the brian then they eat the brian. The violante beautify the brian.", "logic": "\nRoar(brian, violante)\nSteamroll(brian, violante)\nSteamroll(violante, brian)\nforall x (Steamroll(x, violante) and Roar(violante, brian) -> Steamroll(violante, brian))\nforall x (Beautify(x, violante) -> Butyric(x))\nBeautify(brian, violante) -> Roar(violante, brian)\nforall x (Roar(x, violante) and Beautify(violante, brian) -> Beautify(brian, violante))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, violante) -> Beautify(violante, brian))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, brian) -> Roar(x, brian))\n\nBeautify(violante, brian)\n\nSteamroll(brian, violante) and forall x (Steamroll(x, violante) -> Beautify(violante, brian)) -> therefore Beautify(violante, brian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The tracee critique the lira. The tracee articulate the lira. The lira articulate the tracee. If someone articulate the lira and the lira critique the tracee then the lira articulate the tracee. If someone anger the lira then they are doctoral. If the tracee anger the lira then the lira critique the tracee. If someone critique the lira and the lira anger the tracee then the tracee anger the lira. If someone articulate the lira then the lira anger the tracee. If someone articulate the tracee then they eat the tracee. The lira does not visit the tracee.", "logic": "\nCritique(tracee, lira)\nArticulate(tracee, lira)\nArticulate(lira, tracee)\nforall x (Articulate(x, lira) and Critique(lira, tracee) -> Articulate(lira, tracee))\nforall x (Anger(x, lira) -> Doctoral(x))\nAnger(tracee, lira) -> Critique(lira, tracee)\nforall x (Critique(x, lira) and Anger(lira, tracee) -> Anger(tracee, lira))\nforall x (Articulate(x, lira) -> Anger(lira, tracee))\nforall x (Articulate(x, tracee) -> Critique(x, tracee))\n\nnot Anger(lira, tracee)\n\nArticulate(tracee, lira) and forall x (Articulate(x, lira) -> Anger(lira, tracee)) -> therefore Anger(lira, tracee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The blondelle bulldog the noelani. The blondelle motor the noelani. The noelani motor the blondelle. If someone motor the noelani and the noelani bulldog the blondelle then the noelani motor the blondelle. If someone instance the noelani then they are unwell. If the blondelle instance the noelani then the noelani bulldog the blondelle. If someone bulldog the noelani and the noelani instance the blondelle then the blondelle instance the noelani. If someone motor the noelani then the noelani instance the blondelle. If someone motor the blondelle then they eat the blondelle. The blondelle instance the noelani.", "logic": "\nBulldog(blondelle, noelani)\nMotor(blondelle, noelani)\nMotor(noelani, blondelle)\nforall x (Motor(x, noelani) and Bulldog(noelani, blondelle) -> Motor(noelani, blondelle))\nforall x (Instance(x, noelani) -> Unwell(x))\nInstance(blondelle, noelani) -> Bulldog(noelani, blondelle)\nforall x (Bulldog(x, noelani) and Instance(noelani, blondelle) -> Instance(blondelle, noelani))\nforall x (Motor(x, noelani) -> Instance(noelani, blondelle))\nforall x (Motor(x, blondelle) -> Bulldog(x, blondelle))\n\nInstance(blondelle, noelani)\n\nMotor(blondelle, noelani) and forall x (Motor(x, noelani) -> Instance(noelani, blondelle)) -> therefore Instance(noelani, blondelle) Bulldog(blondelle, noelani) and Instance(noelani, blondelle) and forall x (Bulldog(x, noelani) and Instance(noelani, blondelle) -> Instance(blondelle, noelani)) -> therefore Instance(blondelle, noelani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The chevy unzip the jackelyn. The chevy wreak the jackelyn. The jackelyn wreak the chevy. If someone wreak the jackelyn and the jackelyn unzip the chevy then the jackelyn wreak the chevy. If someone wrawl the jackelyn then they are finnish. If the chevy wrawl the jackelyn then the jackelyn unzip the chevy. If someone unzip the jackelyn and the jackelyn wrawl the chevy then the chevy wrawl the jackelyn. If someone wreak the jackelyn then the jackelyn wrawl the chevy. If someone wreak the chevy then they eat the chevy. The chevy does not visit the jackelyn.", "logic": "\nUnzip(chevy, jackelyn)\nWreak(chevy, jackelyn)\nWreak(jackelyn, chevy)\nforall x (Wreak(x, jackelyn) and Unzip(jackelyn, chevy) -> Wreak(jackelyn, chevy))\nforall x (Wrawl(x, jackelyn) -> Finnish(x))\nWrawl(chevy, jackelyn) -> Unzip(jackelyn, chevy)\nforall x (Unzip(x, jackelyn) and Wrawl(jackelyn, chevy) -> Wrawl(chevy, jackelyn))\nforall x (Wreak(x, jackelyn) -> Wrawl(jackelyn, chevy))\nforall x (Wreak(x, chevy) -> Unzip(x, chevy))\n\nnot Wrawl(chevy, jackelyn)\n\nWreak(chevy, jackelyn) and forall x (Wreak(x, jackelyn) -> Wrawl(jackelyn, chevy)) -> therefore Wrawl(jackelyn, chevy) Unzip(chevy, jackelyn) and Wrawl(jackelyn, chevy) and forall x (Unzip(x, jackelyn) and Wrawl(jackelyn, chevy) -> Wrawl(chevy, jackelyn)) -> therefore Wrawl(chevy, jackelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The sheldon barb the roseann. The sheldon incrust the roseann. The roseann incrust the sheldon. If someone incrust the roseann and the roseann barb the sheldon then the roseann incrust the sheldon. If someone liquidise the roseann then they are grecian. If the sheldon liquidise the roseann then the roseann barb the sheldon. If someone barb the roseann and the roseann liquidise the sheldon then the sheldon liquidise the roseann. If someone incrust the roseann then the roseann liquidise the sheldon. If someone incrust the sheldon then they eat the sheldon. The sheldon is grecian.", "logic": "\nBarb(sheldon, roseann)\nIncrust(sheldon, roseann)\nIncrust(roseann, sheldon)\nforall x (Incrust(x, roseann) and Barb(roseann, sheldon) -> Incrust(roseann, sheldon))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, roseann) -> Grecian(x))\nLiquidise(sheldon, roseann) -> Barb(roseann, sheldon)\nforall x (Barb(x, roseann) and Liquidise(roseann, sheldon) -> Liquidise(sheldon, roseann))\nforall x (Incrust(x, roseann) -> Liquidise(roseann, sheldon))\nforall x (Incrust(x, sheldon) -> Barb(x, sheldon))\n\nGrecian(sheldon)\n\nIncrust(sheldon, roseann) and forall x (Incrust(x, roseann) -> Liquidise(roseann, sheldon)) -> therefore Liquidise(roseann, sheldon) Barb(sheldon, roseann) and Liquidise(roseann, sheldon) and forall x (Barb(x, roseann) and Liquidise(roseann, sheldon) -> Liquidise(sheldon, roseann)) -> therefore Liquidise(sheldon, roseann) Liquidise(sheldon, roseann) and forall x (Liquidise(x, roseann) -> Grecian(x)) -> therefore Grecian(sheldon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The mackenzie eternalise the teressa. The mackenzie saunter the teressa. The teressa saunter the mackenzie. If someone saunter the teressa and the teressa eternalise the mackenzie then the teressa saunter the mackenzie. If someone urbanize the teressa then they are despotical. If the mackenzie urbanize the teressa then the teressa eternalise the mackenzie. If someone eternalise the teressa and the teressa urbanize the mackenzie then the mackenzie urbanize the teressa. If someone saunter the teressa then the teressa urbanize the mackenzie. If someone saunter the mackenzie then they eat the mackenzie. The mackenzie is not despotical.", "logic": "\nEternalise(mackenzie, teressa)\nSaunter(mackenzie, teressa)\nSaunter(teressa, mackenzie)\nforall x (Saunter(x, teressa) and Eternalise(teressa, mackenzie) -> Saunter(teressa, mackenzie))\nforall x (Urbanize(x, teressa) -> Despotical(x))\nUrbanize(mackenzie, teressa) -> Eternalise(teressa, mackenzie)\nforall x (Eternalise(x, teressa) and Urbanize(teressa, mackenzie) -> Urbanize(mackenzie, teressa))\nforall x (Saunter(x, teressa) -> Urbanize(teressa, mackenzie))\nforall x (Saunter(x, mackenzie) -> Eternalise(x, mackenzie))\n\nnot Despotical(mackenzie)\n\nSaunter(mackenzie, teressa) and forall x (Saunter(x, teressa) -> Urbanize(teressa, mackenzie)) -> therefore Urbanize(teressa, mackenzie) Eternalise(mackenzie, teressa) and Urbanize(teressa, mackenzie) and forall x (Eternalise(x, teressa) and Urbanize(teressa, mackenzie) -> Urbanize(mackenzie, teressa)) -> therefore Urbanize(mackenzie, teressa) Urbanize(mackenzie, teressa) and forall x (Urbanize(x, teressa) -> Despotical(x)) -> therefore Despotical(mackenzie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The wendel bemock the benjie. The wendel monish the benjie. The benjie monish the wendel. If someone monish the benjie and the benjie bemock the wendel then the benjie monish the wendel. If someone distract the benjie then they are scaleless. If the wendel distract the benjie then the benjie bemock the wendel. If someone bemock the benjie and the benjie distract the wendel then the wendel distract the benjie. If someone monish the benjie then the benjie distract the wendel. If someone monish the wendel then they eat the wendel. The benjie is not scaleless.", "logic": "\nBemock(wendel, benjie)\nMonish(wendel, benjie)\nMonish(benjie, wendel)\nforall x (Monish(x, benjie) and Bemock(benjie, wendel) -> Monish(benjie, wendel))\nforall x (Distract(x, benjie) -> Scaleless(x))\nDistract(wendel, benjie) -> Bemock(benjie, wendel)\nforall x (Bemock(x, benjie) and Distract(benjie, wendel) -> Distract(wendel, benjie))\nforall x (Monish(x, benjie) -> Distract(benjie, wendel))\nforall x (Monish(x, wendel) -> Bemock(x, wendel))\n\nnot Scaleless(benjie)\n\nforall x (Distract(x, benjie) -> Scaleless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The tome raise the kati. The tome collocate the kati. The kati collocate the tome. If someone collocate the kati and the kati raise the tome then the kati collocate the tome. If someone accrue the kati then they are shoddy. If the tome accrue the kati then the kati raise the tome. If someone raise the kati and the kati accrue the tome then the tome accrue the kati. If someone collocate the kati then the kati accrue the tome. If someone collocate the tome then they eat the tome. The tome raise the tome.", "logic": "\nRaise(tome, kati)\nCollocate(tome, kati)\nCollocate(kati, tome)\nforall x (Collocate(x, kati) and Raise(kati, tome) -> Collocate(kati, tome))\nforall x (Accrue(x, kati) -> Shoddy(x))\nAccrue(tome, kati) -> Raise(kati, tome)\nforall x (Raise(x, kati) and Accrue(kati, tome) -> Accrue(tome, kati))\nforall x (Collocate(x, kati) -> Accrue(kati, tome))\nforall x (Collocate(x, tome) -> Raise(x, tome))\n\nRaise(tome, tome)\n\nforall x (Collocate(x, tome) -> Raise(x, tome)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The godiva undervalue the dorene. The godiva brighten the dorene. The dorene brighten the godiva. If someone brighten the dorene and the dorene undervalue the godiva then the dorene brighten the godiva. If someone bellyache the dorene then they are pinchbeck. If the godiva bellyache the dorene then the dorene undervalue the godiva. If someone undervalue the dorene and the dorene bellyache the godiva then the godiva bellyache the dorene. If someone brighten the dorene then the dorene bellyache the godiva. If someone brighten the godiva then they eat the godiva. The dorene does not see the dorene.", "logic": "\nUndervalue(godiva, dorene)\nBrighten(godiva, dorene)\nBrighten(dorene, godiva)\nforall x (Brighten(x, dorene) and Undervalue(dorene, godiva) -> Brighten(dorene, godiva))\nforall x (Bellyache(x, dorene) -> Pinchbeck(x))\nBellyache(godiva, dorene) -> Undervalue(dorene, godiva)\nforall x (Undervalue(x, dorene) and Bellyache(dorene, godiva) -> Bellyache(godiva, dorene))\nforall x (Brighten(x, dorene) -> Bellyache(dorene, godiva))\nforall x (Brighten(x, godiva) -> Undervalue(x, godiva))\n\nnot Brighten(dorene, dorene)\n\nnot Brighten(dorene, dorene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The zorine dock the danie. The zorine repercuss the danie. The danie repercuss the zorine. If someone repercuss the danie and the danie dock the zorine then the danie repercuss the zorine. If someone picture the danie then they are nonunion. If the zorine picture the danie then the danie dock the zorine. If someone dock the danie and the danie picture the zorine then the zorine picture the danie. If someone repercuss the danie then the danie picture the zorine. If someone repercuss the zorine then they eat the zorine. The danie picture the danie.", "logic": "\nDock(zorine, danie)\nRepercuss(zorine, danie)\nRepercuss(danie, zorine)\nforall x (Repercuss(x, danie) and Dock(danie, zorine) -> Repercuss(danie, zorine))\nforall x (Picture(x, danie) -> Nonunion(x))\nPicture(zorine, danie) -> Dock(danie, zorine)\nforall x (Dock(x, danie) and Picture(danie, zorine) -> Picture(zorine, danie))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, danie) -> Picture(danie, zorine))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, zorine) -> Dock(x, zorine))\n\nPicture(danie, danie)\n\nPicture(danie, danie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The hamlin coruscate the marieann. The hamlin realine the marieann. The marieann realine the hamlin. If someone realine the marieann and the marieann coruscate the hamlin then the marieann realine the hamlin. If someone spatter the marieann then they are seditious. If the hamlin spatter the marieann then the marieann coruscate the hamlin. If someone coruscate the marieann and the marieann spatter the hamlin then the hamlin spatter the marieann. If someone realine the marieann then the marieann spatter the hamlin. If someone realine the hamlin then they eat the hamlin. The hamlin is not green.", "logic": "\nCoruscate(hamlin, marieann)\nRealine(hamlin, marieann)\nRealine(marieann, hamlin)\nforall x (Realine(x, marieann) and Coruscate(marieann, hamlin) -> Realine(marieann, hamlin))\nforall x (Spatter(x, marieann) -> Seditious(x))\nSpatter(hamlin, marieann) -> Coruscate(marieann, hamlin)\nforall x (Coruscate(x, marieann) and Spatter(marieann, hamlin) -> Spatter(hamlin, marieann))\nforall x (Realine(x, marieann) -> Spatter(marieann, hamlin))\nforall x (Realine(x, hamlin) -> Coruscate(x, hamlin))\n\nnot Green(hamlin)\n\nnot Green(hamlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The billi foredoom the berna. The billi decimate the berna. The berna decimate the billi. If someone decimate the berna and the berna foredoom the billi then the berna decimate the billi. If someone felicitate the berna then they are cuddly. If the billi felicitate the berna then the berna foredoom the billi. If someone foredoom the berna and the berna felicitate the billi then the billi felicitate the berna. If someone decimate the berna then the berna felicitate the billi. If someone decimate the billi then they eat the billi. The billi is rough.", "logic": "\nForedoom(billi, berna)\nDecimate(billi, berna)\nDecimate(berna, billi)\nforall x (Decimate(x, berna) and Foredoom(berna, billi) -> Decimate(berna, billi))\nforall x (Felicitate(x, berna) -> Cuddly(x))\nFelicitate(billi, berna) -> Foredoom(berna, billi)\nforall x (Foredoom(x, berna) and Felicitate(berna, billi) -> Felicitate(billi, berna))\nforall x (Decimate(x, berna) -> Felicitate(berna, billi))\nforall x (Decimate(x, billi) -> Foredoom(x, billi))\n\nRough(billi)\n\nRough(billi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The rahal have the giovanna. The rahal prevent the giovanna. The giovanna prevent the rahal. If someone prevent the giovanna and the giovanna have the rahal then the giovanna prevent the rahal. If someone pension the giovanna then they are pursuing. If the rahal pension the giovanna then the giovanna have the rahal. If someone have the giovanna and the giovanna pension the rahal then the rahal pension the giovanna. If someone prevent the giovanna then the giovanna pension the rahal. If someone prevent the rahal then they eat the rahal. The rahal does not see the rahal.", "logic": "\nHave(rahal, giovanna)\nPrevent(rahal, giovanna)\nPrevent(giovanna, rahal)\nforall x (Prevent(x, giovanna) and Have(giovanna, rahal) -> Prevent(giovanna, rahal))\nforall x (Pension(x, giovanna) -> Pursuing(x))\nPension(rahal, giovanna) -> Have(giovanna, rahal)\nforall x (Have(x, giovanna) and Pension(giovanna, rahal) -> Pension(rahal, giovanna))\nforall x (Prevent(x, giovanna) -> Pension(giovanna, rahal))\nforall x (Prevent(x, rahal) -> Have(x, rahal))\n\nnot Prevent(rahal, rahal)\n\nnot Prevent(rahal, rahal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The davie digitize the hamlin. The davie vroom the hamlin. The hamlin vroom the davie. If someone vroom the hamlin and the hamlin digitize the davie then the hamlin vroom the davie. If someone cloud the hamlin then they are slicked. If the davie cloud the hamlin then the hamlin digitize the davie. If someone digitize the hamlin and the hamlin cloud the davie then the davie cloud the hamlin. If someone vroom the hamlin then the hamlin cloud the davie. If someone vroom the davie then they eat the davie. The hamlin digitize the hamlin.", "logic": "\nDigitize(davie, hamlin)\nVroom(davie, hamlin)\nVroom(hamlin, davie)\nforall x (Vroom(x, hamlin) and Digitize(hamlin, davie) -> Vroom(hamlin, davie))\nforall x (Cloud(x, hamlin) -> Slicked(x))\nCloud(davie, hamlin) -> Digitize(hamlin, davie)\nforall x (Digitize(x, hamlin) and Cloud(hamlin, davie) -> Cloud(davie, hamlin))\nforall x (Vroom(x, hamlin) -> Cloud(hamlin, davie))\nforall x (Vroom(x, davie) -> Digitize(x, davie))\n\nDigitize(hamlin, hamlin)\n\nDigitize(hamlin, hamlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "Osbourne is impromptu. Osbourne is chaldee. Osbourne is unsecured. Osbourne is runic. Osbourne is aoristic. Frayda is impromptu. Frayda is crying. Frayda is sulfuric. Frayda is chaldee. Frayda is unsecured. Frayda is runic. Frayda is aoristic. Lance is impromptu. Lance is sulfuric. Lance is unsecured. Rozanna is chaldee. If something is chaldee then it is runic. If something is runic then it is impromptu. All impromptu things are sulfuric. Rozanna is chaldee.", "logic": "\nImpromptu(osbourne)\nChaldee(osbourne)\nUnsecured(osbourne)\nRunic(osbourne)\nAoristic(osbourne)\nImpromptu(frayda)\nCrying(frayda)\nSulfuric(frayda)\nChaldee(frayda)\nUnsecured(frayda)\nRunic(frayda)\nAoristic(frayda)\nImpromptu(lance)\nSulfuric(lance)\nUnsecured(lance)\nChaldee(rozanna)\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Runic(x))\nforall x (Runic(x) -> Impromptu(x))\nforall x (Impromptu(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\n\nChaldee(rozanna)\n\ntherefore Chaldee(rozanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Jocelin is advised. Jocelin is comestible. Jocelin is abactinal. Jocelin is monastic. Jocelin is anthropoid. Juliana is advised. Juliana is slipshod. Juliana is austere. Juliana is comestible. Juliana is abactinal. Juliana is monastic. Juliana is anthropoid. Devondra is advised. Devondra is austere. Devondra is abactinal. Pauly is comestible. If something is comestible then it is monastic. If something is monastic then it is advised. All advised things are austere. Devondra is not advised.", "logic": "\nAdvised(jocelin)\nComestible(jocelin)\nAbactinal(jocelin)\nMonastic(jocelin)\nAnthropoid(jocelin)\nAdvised(juliana)\nSlipshod(juliana)\nAustere(juliana)\nComestible(juliana)\nAbactinal(juliana)\nMonastic(juliana)\nAnthropoid(juliana)\nAdvised(devondra)\nAustere(devondra)\nAbactinal(devondra)\nComestible(pauly)\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Monastic(x))\nforall x (Monastic(x) -> Advised(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Austere(x))\n\nnot Advised(devondra)\n\ntherefore Advised(devondra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Reinhold is ornery. Reinhold is unmelted. Reinhold is senecan. Reinhold is pancreatic. Reinhold is derisory. Bird is ornery. Bird is crannied. Bird is crabbed. Bird is unmelted. Bird is senecan. Bird is pancreatic. Bird is derisory. Caitrin is ornery. Caitrin is crabbed. Caitrin is senecan. Barret is unmelted. If something is unmelted then it is pancreatic. If something is pancreatic then it is ornery. All ornery things are crabbed. Barret is pancreatic.", "logic": "\nOrnery(reinhold)\nUnmelted(reinhold)\nSenecan(reinhold)\nPancreatic(reinhold)\nDerisory(reinhold)\nOrnery(bird)\nCrannied(bird)\nCrabbed(bird)\nUnmelted(bird)\nSenecan(bird)\nPancreatic(bird)\nDerisory(bird)\nOrnery(caitrin)\nCrabbed(caitrin)\nSenecan(caitrin)\nUnmelted(barret)\nforall x (Unmelted(x) -> Pancreatic(x))\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Ornery(x))\nforall x (Ornery(x) -> Crabbed(x))\n\nPancreatic(barret)\n\nUnmelted(barret) and forall x (Unmelted(x) -> Pancreatic(x)) -> therefore Pancreatic(barret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Ariel is costless. Ariel is master. Ariel is pacifist. Ariel is tenuous. Ariel is semiweekly. Starr is costless. Starr is mycenaean. Starr is nonthermal. Starr is master. Starr is pacifist. Starr is tenuous. Starr is semiweekly. Audry is costless. Audry is nonthermal. Audry is pacifist. Kerrin is master. If something is master then it is tenuous. If something is tenuous then it is costless. All costless things are nonthermal. Ariel is not nonthermal.", "logic": "\nCostless(ariel)\nMaster(ariel)\nPacifist(ariel)\nTenuous(ariel)\nSemiweekly(ariel)\nCostless(starr)\nMycenaean(starr)\nNonthermal(starr)\nMaster(starr)\nPacifist(starr)\nTenuous(starr)\nSemiweekly(starr)\nCostless(audry)\nNonthermal(audry)\nPacifist(audry)\nMaster(kerrin)\nforall x (Master(x) -> Tenuous(x))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Costless(x))\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Nonthermal(x))\n\nnot Nonthermal(ariel)\n\nCostless(ariel) and forall x (Costless(x) -> Nonthermal(x)) -> therefore Nonthermal(ariel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Iago is known. Iago is morphemic. Iago is impassable. Iago is midmost. Iago is accretive. Ethelred is known. Ethelred is ascribable. Ethelred is evocative. Ethelred is morphemic. Ethelred is impassable. Ethelred is midmost. Ethelred is accretive. Dulciana is known. Dulciana is evocative. Dulciana is impassable. Livia is morphemic. If something is morphemic then it is midmost. If something is midmost then it is known. All known things are evocative. Livia is known.", "logic": "\nKnown(iago)\nMorphemic(iago)\nImpassable(iago)\nMidmost(iago)\nAccretive(iago)\nKnown(ethelred)\nAscribable(ethelred)\nEvocative(ethelred)\nMorphemic(ethelred)\nImpassable(ethelred)\nMidmost(ethelred)\nAccretive(ethelred)\nKnown(dulciana)\nEvocative(dulciana)\nImpassable(dulciana)\nMorphemic(livia)\nforall x (Morphemic(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Midmost(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Known(x) -> Evocative(x))\n\nKnown(livia)\n\nMorphemic(livia) and forall x (Morphemic(x) -> Midmost(x)) -> therefore Midmost(livia) Midmost(livia) and forall x (Midmost(x) -> Known(x)) -> therefore Known(livia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Ardis is cuddlesome. Ardis is selfish. Ardis is encyclical. Ardis is unplaced. Ardis is advisory. Greer is cuddlesome. Greer is doleful. Greer is ensiform. Greer is selfish. Greer is encyclical. Greer is unplaced. Greer is advisory. Lawrence is cuddlesome. Lawrence is ensiform. Lawrence is encyclical. Daryle is selfish. If something is selfish then it is unplaced. If something is unplaced then it is cuddlesome. All cuddlesome things are ensiform. Daryle is not cuddlesome.", "logic": "\nCuddlesome(ardis)\nSelfish(ardis)\nEncyclical(ardis)\nUnplaced(ardis)\nAdvisory(ardis)\nCuddlesome(greer)\nDoleful(greer)\nEnsiform(greer)\nSelfish(greer)\nEncyclical(greer)\nUnplaced(greer)\nAdvisory(greer)\nCuddlesome(lawrence)\nEnsiform(lawrence)\nEncyclical(lawrence)\nSelfish(daryle)\nforall x (Selfish(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Ensiform(x))\n\nnot Cuddlesome(daryle)\n\nSelfish(daryle) and forall x (Selfish(x) -> Unplaced(x)) -> therefore Unplaced(daryle) Unplaced(daryle) and forall x (Unplaced(x) -> Cuddlesome(x)) -> therefore Cuddlesome(daryle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Hannis is expanded. Hannis is oozing. Hannis is cohesive. Hannis is protrusive. Hannis is used. Levin is expanded. Levin is peregrine. Levin is panicky. Levin is oozing. Levin is cohesive. Levin is protrusive. Levin is used. Tremain is expanded. Tremain is panicky. Tremain is cohesive. Aime is oozing. If something is oozing then it is protrusive. If something is protrusive then it is expanded. All expanded things are panicky. Aime is panicky.", "logic": "\nExpanded(hannis)\nOozing(hannis)\nCohesive(hannis)\nProtrusive(hannis)\nUsed(hannis)\nExpanded(levin)\nPeregrine(levin)\nPanicky(levin)\nOozing(levin)\nCohesive(levin)\nProtrusive(levin)\nUsed(levin)\nExpanded(tremain)\nPanicky(tremain)\nCohesive(tremain)\nOozing(aime)\nforall x (Oozing(x) -> Protrusive(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Expanded(x) -> Panicky(x))\n\nPanicky(aime)\n\nOozing(aime) and forall x (Oozing(x) -> Protrusive(x)) -> therefore Protrusive(aime) Protrusive(aime) and forall x (Protrusive(x) -> Expanded(x)) -> therefore Expanded(aime) Expanded(aime) and forall x (Expanded(x) -> Panicky(x)) -> therefore Panicky(aime)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Lyndel is prepupal. Lyndel is stitched. Lyndel is histrionic. Lyndel is beetle. Lyndel is healed. Britaney is prepupal. Britaney is unforeseen. Britaney is accordant. Britaney is stitched. Britaney is histrionic. Britaney is beetle. Britaney is healed. Kimmo is prepupal. Kimmo is accordant. Kimmo is histrionic. Graham is stitched. If something is stitched then it is beetle. If something is beetle then it is prepupal. All prepupal things are accordant. Graham is not accordant.", "logic": "\nPrepupal(lyndel)\nStitched(lyndel)\nHistrionic(lyndel)\nBeetle(lyndel)\nHealed(lyndel)\nPrepupal(britaney)\nUnforeseen(britaney)\nAccordant(britaney)\nStitched(britaney)\nHistrionic(britaney)\nBeetle(britaney)\nHealed(britaney)\nPrepupal(kimmo)\nAccordant(kimmo)\nHistrionic(kimmo)\nStitched(graham)\nforall x (Stitched(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Prepupal(x))\nforall x (Prepupal(x) -> Accordant(x))\n\nnot Accordant(graham)\n\nStitched(graham) and forall x (Stitched(x) -> Beetle(x)) -> therefore Beetle(graham) Beetle(graham) and forall x (Beetle(x) -> Prepupal(x)) -> therefore Prepupal(graham) Prepupal(graham) and forall x (Prepupal(x) -> Accordant(x)) -> therefore Accordant(graham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Sven is pompous. Sven is lentissimo. Sven is barreled. Sven is parttime. Sven is fanatical. Doralynne is pompous. Doralynne is seven. Doralynne is gutless. Doralynne is lentissimo. Doralynne is barreled. Doralynne is parttime. Doralynne is fanatical. Philis is pompous. Philis is gutless. Philis is barreled. Rosalind is lentissimo. If something is lentissimo then it is parttime. If something is parttime then it is pompous. All pompous things are gutless. Philis is not parttime.", "logic": "\nPompous(sven)\nLentissimo(sven)\nBarreled(sven)\nParttime(sven)\nFanatical(sven)\nPompous(doralynne)\nSeven(doralynne)\nGutless(doralynne)\nLentissimo(doralynne)\nBarreled(doralynne)\nParttime(doralynne)\nFanatical(doralynne)\nPompous(philis)\nGutless(philis)\nBarreled(philis)\nLentissimo(rosalind)\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) -> Parttime(x))\nforall x (Parttime(x) -> Pompous(x))\nforall x (Pompous(x) -> Gutless(x))\n\nnot Parttime(philis)\n\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) -> Parttime(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Adolfo is sanitary. Adolfo is pomaded. Adolfo is corked. Adolfo is abridged. Adolfo is dear. Alfonso is sanitary. Alfonso is utilizable. Alfonso is onshore. Alfonso is pomaded. Alfonso is corked. Alfonso is abridged. Alfonso is dear. Ludvig is sanitary. Ludvig is onshore. Ludvig is corked. Umeko is pomaded. If something is pomaded then it is abridged. If something is abridged then it is sanitary. All sanitary things are onshore. Ludvig is utilizable.", "logic": "\nSanitary(adolfo)\nPomaded(adolfo)\nCorked(adolfo)\nAbridged(adolfo)\nDear(adolfo)\nSanitary(alfonso)\nUtilizable(alfonso)\nOnshore(alfonso)\nPomaded(alfonso)\nCorked(alfonso)\nAbridged(alfonso)\nDear(alfonso)\nSanitary(ludvig)\nOnshore(ludvig)\nCorked(ludvig)\nPomaded(umeko)\nforall x (Pomaded(x) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Sanitary(x))\nforall x (Sanitary(x) -> Onshore(x))\n\nUtilizable(ludvig)\n\nUtilizable(ludvig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Leisha is aflutter. Leisha is fretful. Leisha is tautologic. Leisha is transonic. Leisha is tyrolese. Antoine is aflutter. Antoine is slippery. Antoine is brainy. Antoine is fretful. Antoine is tautologic. Antoine is transonic. Antoine is tyrolese. Agneta is aflutter. Agneta is brainy. Agneta is tautologic. Meade is fretful. If something is fretful then it is transonic. If something is transonic then it is aflutter. All aflutter things are brainy. Meade is not tautologic.", "logic": "\nAflutter(leisha)\nFretful(leisha)\nTautologic(leisha)\nTransonic(leisha)\nTyrolese(leisha)\nAflutter(antoine)\nSlippery(antoine)\nBrainy(antoine)\nFretful(antoine)\nTautologic(antoine)\nTransonic(antoine)\nTyrolese(antoine)\nAflutter(agneta)\nBrainy(agneta)\nTautologic(agneta)\nFretful(meade)\nforall x (Fretful(x) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Aflutter(x))\nforall x (Aflutter(x) -> Brainy(x))\n\nnot Tautologic(meade)\n\nnot Tautologic(meade) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Georgine is thirteenth. Georgine is entire. Georgine is dominant. Georgine is violet. Georgine is automated. Oriana is thirteenth. Oriana is synchronal. Oriana is down. Oriana is entire. Oriana is dominant. Oriana is violet. Oriana is automated. Fran is thirteenth. Fran is down. Fran is dominant. Arturo is entire. If something is entire then it is violet. If something is violet then it is thirteenth. All thirteenth things are down. Arturo is automated.", "logic": "\nThirteenth(georgine)\nEntire(georgine)\nDominant(georgine)\nViolet(georgine)\nAutomated(georgine)\nThirteenth(oriana)\nSynchronal(oriana)\nDown(oriana)\nEntire(oriana)\nDominant(oriana)\nViolet(oriana)\nAutomated(oriana)\nThirteenth(fran)\nDown(fran)\nDominant(fran)\nEntire(arturo)\nforall x (Entire(x) -> Violet(x))\nforall x (Violet(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) -> Down(x))\n\nAutomated(arturo)\n\nAutomated(arturo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Minta is aldermanly. Minta is nursed. Minta is expiatory. Minta is linelike. Minta is vibrant. Wendell is aldermanly. Wendell is adjective. Wendell is suffusive. Wendell is nursed. Wendell is expiatory. Wendell is linelike. Wendell is vibrant. Jessika is aldermanly. Jessika is suffusive. Jessika is expiatory. Ingram is nursed. If something is nursed then it is linelike. If something is linelike then it is aldermanly. All aldermanly things are suffusive. Ingram is not adjective.", "logic": "\nAldermanly(minta)\nNursed(minta)\nExpiatory(minta)\nLinelike(minta)\nVibrant(minta)\nAldermanly(wendell)\nAdjective(wendell)\nSuffusive(wendell)\nNursed(wendell)\nExpiatory(wendell)\nLinelike(wendell)\nVibrant(wendell)\nAldermanly(jessika)\nSuffusive(jessika)\nExpiatory(jessika)\nNursed(ingram)\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Linelike(x))\nforall x (Linelike(x) -> Aldermanly(x))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Suffusive(x))\n\nnot Adjective(ingram)\n\nnot Adjective(ingram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Aridatha is proustian. Aridatha is boring. Aridatha is sequential. Aridatha is edited. Aridatha is flossy. Claudette is proustian. Claudette is overdue. Claudette is gracious. Claudette is boring. Claudette is sequential. Claudette is edited. Claudette is flossy. Birgit is proustian. Birgit is gracious. Birgit is sequential. Taddeus is boring. If something is boring then it is edited. If something is edited then it is proustian. All proustian things are gracious. Birgit is flossy.", "logic": "\nProustian(aridatha)\nBoring(aridatha)\nSequential(aridatha)\nEdited(aridatha)\nFlossy(aridatha)\nProustian(claudette)\nOverdue(claudette)\nGracious(claudette)\nBoring(claudette)\nSequential(claudette)\nEdited(claudette)\nFlossy(claudette)\nProustian(birgit)\nGracious(birgit)\nSequential(birgit)\nBoring(taddeus)\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Edited(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Proustian(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Gracious(x))\n\nFlossy(birgit)\n\nFlossy(birgit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Lynnet is mismatched. Lynnet is numeral. Lynnet is activistic. Lynnet is wondrous. Lynnet is sanctified. Andriana is mismatched. Andriana is unbent. Andriana is stenotic. Andriana is numeral. Andriana is activistic. Andriana is wondrous. Andriana is sanctified. Rem is mismatched. Rem is stenotic. Rem is activistic. Milzie is numeral. If something is numeral then it is wondrous. If something is wondrous then it is mismatched. All mismatched things are stenotic. Lynnet is not unbent.", "logic": "\nMismatched(lynnet)\nNumeral(lynnet)\nActivistic(lynnet)\nWondrous(lynnet)\nSanctified(lynnet)\nMismatched(andriana)\nUnbent(andriana)\nStenotic(andriana)\nNumeral(andriana)\nActivistic(andriana)\nWondrous(andriana)\nSanctified(andriana)\nMismatched(rem)\nStenotic(rem)\nActivistic(rem)\nNumeral(milzie)\nforall x (Numeral(x) -> Wondrous(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Mismatched(x))\nforall x (Mismatched(x) -> Stenotic(x))\n\nnot Unbent(lynnet)\n\nnot Unbent(lynnet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Garwood is hircine. Garwood is autocratic. Garwood is galore. Garwood is thwarted. Garwood is dissolved. Kylila is hircine. Kylila is defunct. Kylila is crackers. Kylila is autocratic. Kylila is galore. Kylila is thwarted. Kylila is dissolved. Bela is hircine. Bela is crackers. Bela is galore. Franny is autocratic. If something is autocratic then it is thwarted. If something is thwarted then it is hircine. All hircine things are crackers. Bela is autocratic.", "logic": "\nHircine(garwood)\nAutocratic(garwood)\nGalore(garwood)\nThwarted(garwood)\nDissolved(garwood)\nHircine(kylila)\nDefunct(kylila)\nCrackers(kylila)\nAutocratic(kylila)\nGalore(kylila)\nThwarted(kylila)\nDissolved(kylila)\nHircine(bela)\nCrackers(bela)\nGalore(bela)\nAutocratic(franny)\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> Thwarted(x))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) -> Hircine(x))\nforall x (Hircine(x) -> Crackers(x))\n\nAutocratic(bela)\n\nAutocratic(bela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Tim is proclaimed. Tim is chadian. Tim is delicate. Tim is lupine. Tymon is delicate. Tymon is harmful. Jonny is bald. Jonny is chadian. Jonny is delicate. Jonny is not lupine. If Tymon is chadian then Tymon is lupine. If something is restful then it is delicate. If something is harmful then it is delicate. All harmful, chadian things are delicate. All harmful things are chadian. If something is harmful then it is chadian. If something is proclaimed then it is chadian. If something is lupine then it is restful. Jonny is delicate.", "logic": "\nProclaimed(tim)\nChadian(tim)\nDelicate(tim)\nLupine(tim)\nDelicate(tymon)\nHarmful(tymon)\nBald(jonny)\nChadian(jonny)\nDelicate(jonny)\nnot Lupine(jonny)\nChadian(tymon) -> Lupine(tymon)\nforall x (Restful(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Harmful(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Harmful(x) and Chadian(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Harmful(x) -> Chadian(x))\nforall x (Harmful(x) -> Chadian(x))\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) -> Chadian(x))\nforall x (Lupine(x) -> Restful(x))\n\nDelicate(jonny)\n\ntherefore Delicate(jonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Ginevra is completing. Ginevra is scruffy. Ginevra is platyrhine. Ginevra is fringed. Anallise is platyrhine. Anallise is dominating. Benoite is spacey. Benoite is scruffy. Benoite is platyrhine. Benoite is not fringed. If Anallise is scruffy then Anallise is fringed. If something is mammoth then it is platyrhine. If something is dominating then it is platyrhine. All dominating, scruffy things are platyrhine. All dominating things are scruffy. If something is dominating then it is scruffy. If something is completing then it is scruffy. If something is fringed then it is mammoth. Benoite is not scruffy.", "logic": "\nCompleting(ginevra)\nScruffy(ginevra)\nPlatyrhine(ginevra)\nFringed(ginevra)\nPlatyrhine(anallise)\nDominating(anallise)\nSpacey(benoite)\nScruffy(benoite)\nPlatyrhine(benoite)\nnot Fringed(benoite)\nScruffy(anallise) -> Fringed(anallise)\nforall x (Mammoth(x) -> Platyrhine(x))\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Platyrhine(x))\nforall x (Dominating(x) and Scruffy(x) -> Platyrhine(x))\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Completing(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Fringed(x) -> Mammoth(x))\n\nnot Scruffy(benoite)\n\ntherefore Scruffy(benoite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Lothar is commercial. Lothar is heraldic. Lothar is tart. Lothar is biovular. Gina is tart. Gina is katari. Cortney is unheeding. Cortney is heraldic. Cortney is tart. Cortney is not biovular. If Gina is heraldic then Gina is biovular. If something is engaging then it is tart. If something is katari then it is tart. All katari, heraldic things are tart. All katari things are heraldic. If something is katari then it is heraldic. If something is commercial then it is heraldic. If something is biovular then it is engaging. Lothar is engaging.", "logic": "\nCommercial(lothar)\nHeraldic(lothar)\nTart(lothar)\nBiovular(lothar)\nTart(gina)\nKatari(gina)\nUnheeding(cortney)\nHeraldic(cortney)\nTart(cortney)\nnot Biovular(cortney)\nHeraldic(gina) -> Biovular(gina)\nforall x (Engaging(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) and Heraldic(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Commercial(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Biovular(x) -> Engaging(x))\n\nEngaging(lothar)\n\nBiovular(lothar) and forall x (Biovular(x) -> Engaging(x)) -> therefore Engaging(lothar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Deryl is zygomatic. Deryl is tacky. Deryl is skilled. Deryl is alimental. Randolf is skilled. Randolf is nomadic. Lucille is scathing. Lucille is tacky. Lucille is skilled. Lucille is not alimental. If Randolf is tacky then Randolf is alimental. If something is banded then it is skilled. If something is nomadic then it is skilled. All nomadic, tacky things are skilled. All nomadic things are tacky. If something is nomadic then it is tacky. If something is zygomatic then it is tacky. If something is alimental then it is banded. Randolf is not tacky.", "logic": "\nZygomatic(deryl)\nTacky(deryl)\nSkilled(deryl)\nAlimental(deryl)\nSkilled(randolf)\nNomadic(randolf)\nScathing(lucille)\nTacky(lucille)\nSkilled(lucille)\nnot Alimental(lucille)\nTacky(randolf) -> Alimental(randolf)\nforall x (Banded(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) and Tacky(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Alimental(x) -> Banded(x))\n\nnot Tacky(randolf)\n\nNomadic(randolf) and forall x (Nomadic(x) -> Tacky(x)) -> therefore Tacky(randolf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Melva is final. Melva is stingless. Melva is ungrudging. Melva is dinky. Hartley is ungrudging. Hartley is quizzical. Jenelle is vatic. Jenelle is stingless. Jenelle is ungrudging. Jenelle is not dinky. If Hartley is stingless then Hartley is dinky. If something is shelfy then it is ungrudging. If something is quizzical then it is ungrudging. All quizzical, stingless things are ungrudging. All quizzical things are stingless. If something is quizzical then it is stingless. If something is final then it is stingless. If something is dinky then it is shelfy. Hartley is dinky.", "logic": "\nFinal(melva)\nStingless(melva)\nUngrudging(melva)\nDinky(melva)\nUngrudging(hartley)\nQuizzical(hartley)\nVatic(jenelle)\nStingless(jenelle)\nUngrudging(jenelle)\nnot Dinky(jenelle)\nStingless(hartley) -> Dinky(hartley)\nforall x (Shelfy(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) and Stingless(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Stingless(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Stingless(x))\nforall x (Final(x) -> Stingless(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Shelfy(x))\n\nDinky(hartley)\n\nQuizzical(hartley) and forall x (Quizzical(x) -> Stingless(x)) -> therefore Stingless(hartley) Stingless(hartley) and Stingless(hartley) -> Dinky(hartley) -> therefore Dinky(hartley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Ham is sheared. Ham is degage. Ham is huddled. Ham is cardboard. Pepito is huddled. Pepito is brachiopod. Doralia is insensate. Doralia is degage. Doralia is huddled. Doralia is not cardboard. If Pepito is degage then Pepito is cardboard. If something is rimless then it is huddled. If something is brachiopod then it is huddled. All brachiopod, degage things are huddled. All brachiopod things are degage. If something is brachiopod then it is degage. If something is sheared then it is degage. If something is cardboard then it is rimless. Pepito is not cardboard.", "logic": "\nSheared(ham)\nDegage(ham)\nHuddled(ham)\nCardboard(ham)\nHuddled(pepito)\nBrachiopod(pepito)\nInsensate(doralia)\nDegage(doralia)\nHuddled(doralia)\nnot Cardboard(doralia)\nDegage(pepito) -> Cardboard(pepito)\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) and Degage(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) -> Degage(x))\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) -> Degage(x))\nforall x (Sheared(x) -> Degage(x))\nforall x (Cardboard(x) -> Rimless(x))\n\nnot Cardboard(pepito)\n\nBrachiopod(pepito) and forall x (Brachiopod(x) -> Degage(x)) -> therefore Degage(pepito) Degage(pepito) and Degage(pepito) -> Cardboard(pepito) -> therefore Cardboard(pepito)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Giff is famished. Giff is remarkable. Giff is bivariate. Giff is countless. Emlynn is bivariate. Emlynn is rewardful. Rex is lowered. Rex is remarkable. Rex is bivariate. Rex is not countless. If Emlynn is remarkable then Emlynn is countless. If something is awninged then it is bivariate. If something is rewardful then it is bivariate. All rewardful, remarkable things are bivariate. All rewardful things are remarkable. If something is rewardful then it is remarkable. If something is famished then it is remarkable. If something is countless then it is awninged. Emlynn is awninged.", "logic": "\nFamished(giff)\nRemarkable(giff)\nBivariate(giff)\nCountless(giff)\nBivariate(emlynn)\nRewardful(emlynn)\nLowered(rex)\nRemarkable(rex)\nBivariate(rex)\nnot Countless(rex)\nRemarkable(emlynn) -> Countless(emlynn)\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) and Remarkable(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Famished(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Countless(x) -> Awninged(x))\n\nAwninged(emlynn)\n\nRewardful(emlynn) and forall x (Rewardful(x) -> Remarkable(x)) -> therefore Remarkable(emlynn) Remarkable(emlynn) and Remarkable(emlynn) -> Countless(emlynn) -> therefore Countless(emlynn) Countless(emlynn) and forall x (Countless(x) -> Awninged(x)) -> therefore Awninged(emlynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Judie is temptable. Judie is cuspated. Judie is jealous. Judie is peremptory. Chaunce is jealous. Chaunce is allotropic. Nealson is pulmonary. Nealson is cuspated. Nealson is jealous. Nealson is not peremptory. If Chaunce is cuspated then Chaunce is peremptory. If something is aerobiotic then it is jealous. If something is allotropic then it is jealous. All allotropic, cuspated things are jealous. All allotropic things are cuspated. If something is allotropic then it is cuspated. If something is temptable then it is cuspated. If something is peremptory then it is aerobiotic. Chaunce is not aerobiotic.", "logic": "\nTemptable(judie)\nCuspated(judie)\nJealous(judie)\nPeremptory(judie)\nJealous(chaunce)\nAllotropic(chaunce)\nPulmonary(nealson)\nCuspated(nealson)\nJealous(nealson)\nnot Peremptory(nealson)\nCuspated(chaunce) -> Peremptory(chaunce)\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Allotropic(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Allotropic(x) and Cuspated(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Allotropic(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Allotropic(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Temptable(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Peremptory(x) -> Aerobiotic(x))\n\nnot Aerobiotic(chaunce)\n\nAllotropic(chaunce) and forall x (Allotropic(x) -> Cuspated(x)) -> therefore Cuspated(chaunce) Cuspated(chaunce) and Cuspated(chaunce) -> Peremptory(chaunce) -> therefore Peremptory(chaunce) Peremptory(chaunce) and forall x (Peremptory(x) -> Aerobiotic(x)) -> therefore Aerobiotic(chaunce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Englebert is moony. Englebert is depressed. Englebert is inorganic. Englebert is endurable. Mario is inorganic. Mario is sloping. Patrick is odorless. Patrick is depressed. Patrick is inorganic. Patrick is not endurable. If Mario is depressed then Mario is endurable. If something is midweekly then it is inorganic. If something is sloping then it is inorganic. All sloping, depressed things are inorganic. All sloping things are depressed. If something is sloping then it is depressed. If something is moony then it is depressed. If something is endurable then it is midweekly. Patrick is not midweekly.", "logic": "\nMoony(englebert)\nDepressed(englebert)\nInorganic(englebert)\nEndurable(englebert)\nInorganic(mario)\nSloping(mario)\nOdorless(patrick)\nDepressed(patrick)\nInorganic(patrick)\nnot Endurable(patrick)\nDepressed(mario) -> Endurable(mario)\nforall x (Midweekly(x) -> Inorganic(x))\nforall x (Sloping(x) -> Inorganic(x))\nforall x (Sloping(x) and Depressed(x) -> Inorganic(x))\nforall x (Sloping(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Sloping(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Moony(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Endurable(x) -> Midweekly(x))\n\nnot Midweekly(patrick)\n\nforall x (Endurable(x) -> Midweekly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Dena is judicial. Dena is aversive. Dena is precedent. Dena is impious. Ravil is precedent. Ravil is pediatric. Odelinda is geared. Odelinda is aversive. Odelinda is precedent. Odelinda is not impious. If Ravil is aversive then Ravil is impious. If something is desperate then it is precedent. If something is pediatric then it is precedent. All pediatric, aversive things are precedent. All pediatric things are aversive. If something is pediatric then it is aversive. If something is judicial then it is aversive. If something is impious then it is desperate. Ravil is geared.", "logic": "\nJudicial(dena)\nAversive(dena)\nPrecedent(dena)\nImpious(dena)\nPrecedent(ravil)\nPediatric(ravil)\nGeared(odelinda)\nAversive(odelinda)\nPrecedent(odelinda)\nnot Impious(odelinda)\nAversive(ravil) -> Impious(ravil)\nforall x (Desperate(x) -> Precedent(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Precedent(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and Aversive(x) -> Precedent(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Judicial(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Desperate(x))\n\nGeared(ravil)\n\nGeared(ravil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Janus is deserving. Janus is precursory. Janus is cumbrous. Janus is cryonic. Richy is cumbrous. Richy is recurved. Frances is seemly. Frances is precursory. Frances is cumbrous. Frances is not cryonic. If Richy is precursory then Richy is cryonic. If something is broke then it is cumbrous. If something is recurved then it is cumbrous. All recurved, precursory things are cumbrous. All recurved things are precursory. If something is recurved then it is precursory. If something is deserving then it is precursory. If something is cryonic then it is broke. Frances is not deserving.", "logic": "\nDeserving(janus)\nPrecursory(janus)\nCumbrous(janus)\nCryonic(janus)\nCumbrous(richy)\nRecurved(richy)\nSeemly(frances)\nPrecursory(frances)\nCumbrous(frances)\nnot Cryonic(frances)\nPrecursory(richy) -> Cryonic(richy)\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Precursory(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Cryonic(x) -> Broke(x))\n\nnot Deserving(frances)\n\nnot Deserving(frances) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Corabelle is narrative. Corabelle is synclinal. Corabelle is ovular. Corabelle is suffusive. Dimitris is ovular. Dimitris is spatulate. Loria is wound. Loria is synclinal. Loria is ovular. Loria is not suffusive. If Dimitris is synclinal then Dimitris is suffusive. If something is ionic then it is ovular. If something is spatulate then it is ovular. All spatulate, synclinal things are ovular. All spatulate things are synclinal. If something is spatulate then it is synclinal. If something is narrative then it is synclinal. If something is suffusive then it is ionic. Corabelle is wound.", "logic": "\nNarrative(corabelle)\nSynclinal(corabelle)\nOvular(corabelle)\nSuffusive(corabelle)\nOvular(dimitris)\nSpatulate(dimitris)\nWound(loria)\nSynclinal(loria)\nOvular(loria)\nnot Suffusive(loria)\nSynclinal(dimitris) -> Suffusive(dimitris)\nforall x (Ionic(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) and Synclinal(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Suffusive(x) -> Ionic(x))\n\nWound(corabelle)\n\nWound(corabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Nelie is emphasized. Nelie is nodular. Nelie is senseless. Nelie is aftermost. Stepha is senseless. Stepha is biaxate. Kizzie is southward. Kizzie is nodular. Kizzie is senseless. Kizzie is not aftermost. If Stepha is nodular then Stepha is aftermost. If something is frilled then it is senseless. If something is biaxate then it is senseless. All biaxate, nodular things are senseless. All biaxate things are nodular. If something is biaxate then it is nodular. If something is emphasized then it is nodular. If something is aftermost then it is frilled. Kizzie is not biaxate.", "logic": "\nEmphasized(nelie)\nNodular(nelie)\nSenseless(nelie)\nAftermost(nelie)\nSenseless(stepha)\nBiaxate(stepha)\nSouthward(kizzie)\nNodular(kizzie)\nSenseless(kizzie)\nnot Aftermost(kizzie)\nNodular(stepha) -> Aftermost(stepha)\nforall x (Frilled(x) -> Senseless(x))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> Senseless(x))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) and Nodular(x) -> Senseless(x))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Emphasized(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Aftermost(x) -> Frilled(x))\n\nnot Biaxate(kizzie)\n\nnot Biaxate(kizzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Giorgia is exposed. Giorgia is dependent. Giorgia is digressive. Giorgia is multiphase. Margarete is digressive. Margarete is foaming. Cathee is counter. Cathee is dependent. Cathee is digressive. Cathee is not multiphase. If Margarete is dependent then Margarete is multiphase. If something is popish then it is digressive. If something is foaming then it is digressive. All foaming, dependent things are digressive. All foaming things are dependent. If something is foaming then it is dependent. If something is exposed then it is dependent. If something is multiphase then it is popish. Margarete is exposed.", "logic": "\nExposed(giorgia)\nDependent(giorgia)\nDigressive(giorgia)\nMultiphase(giorgia)\nDigressive(margarete)\nFoaming(margarete)\nCounter(cathee)\nDependent(cathee)\nDigressive(cathee)\nnot Multiphase(cathee)\nDependent(margarete) -> Multiphase(margarete)\nforall x (Popish(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) and Dependent(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Multiphase(x) -> Popish(x))\n\nExposed(margarete)\n\nExposed(margarete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Hallam is criminal. Bryn is pyogenic. Bryn is soprano. If someone is sweetheart and soprano then they are pyogenic. Green, criminal people are inflexible. Young, sweetheart people are pyogenic. If someone is twee then they are soprano. White, twee people are pyogenic. If someone is soprano then they are inflexible. Big, inflexible people are sweetheart. If someone is inflexible and sweetheart then they are criminal. Hallam is criminal.", "logic": "\nCriminal(hallam)\nPyogenic(bryn)\nSoprano(bryn)\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) and Soprano(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Twee(x) and Criminal(x) -> Inflexible(x))\nforall x (Criminal(x) and Sweetheart(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Twee(x) -> Soprano(x))\nforall x (Soprano(x) and Twee(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> Inflexible(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and Inflexible(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nforall x (Inflexible(x) and Sweetheart(x) -> Criminal(x))\n\nCriminal(hallam)\n\ntherefore Criminal(hallam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Horst is riant. Maggie is animistic. Maggie is getable. If someone is gallican and getable then they are animistic. Green, riant people are setaceous. Young, gallican people are animistic. If someone is crownless then they are getable. White, crownless people are animistic. If someone is getable then they are setaceous. Big, setaceous people are gallican. If someone is setaceous and gallican then they are riant. Maggie is not animistic.", "logic": "\nRiant(horst)\nAnimistic(maggie)\nGetable(maggie)\nforall x (Gallican(x) and Getable(x) -> Animistic(x))\nforall x (Crownless(x) and Riant(x) -> Setaceous(x))\nforall x (Riant(x) and Gallican(x) -> Animistic(x))\nforall x (Crownless(x) -> Getable(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) and Crownless(x) -> Animistic(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Setaceous(x))\nforall x (Animistic(x) and Setaceous(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Setaceous(x) and Gallican(x) -> Riant(x))\n\nnot Animistic(maggie)\n\ntherefore Animistic(maggie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Hannah is antibiotic. Ragnhild is cubelike. Ragnhild is consular. If someone is procedural and consular then they are cubelike. Green, antibiotic people are theatrical. Young, procedural people are cubelike. If someone is facial then they are consular. White, facial people are cubelike. If someone is consular then they are theatrical. Big, theatrical people are procedural. If someone is theatrical and procedural then they are antibiotic. Ragnhild is theatrical.", "logic": "\nAntibiotic(hannah)\nCubelike(ragnhild)\nConsular(ragnhild)\nforall x (Procedural(x) and Consular(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Facial(x) and Antibiotic(x) -> Theatrical(x))\nforall x (Antibiotic(x) and Procedural(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Facial(x) -> Consular(x))\nforall x (Consular(x) and Facial(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Consular(x) -> Theatrical(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) and Theatrical(x) -> Procedural(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) and Procedural(x) -> Antibiotic(x))\n\nTheatrical(ragnhild)\n\nConsular(ragnhild) and forall x (Consular(x) -> Theatrical(x)) -> therefore Theatrical(ragnhild)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Dacey is diastolic. Clementia is kitschy. Clementia is distal. If someone is overt and distal then they are kitschy. Green, diastolic people are fijian. Young, overt people are kitschy. If someone is wicked then they are distal. White, wicked people are kitschy. If someone is distal then they are fijian. Big, fijian people are overt. If someone is fijian and overt then they are diastolic. Clementia is not fijian.", "logic": "\nDiastolic(dacey)\nKitschy(clementia)\nDistal(clementia)\nforall x (Overt(x) and Distal(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Wicked(x) and Diastolic(x) -> Fijian(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Overt(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Wicked(x) -> Distal(x))\nforall x (Distal(x) and Wicked(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Distal(x) -> Fijian(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Fijian(x) -> Overt(x))\nforall x (Fijian(x) and Overt(x) -> Diastolic(x))\n\nnot Fijian(clementia)\n\nDistal(clementia) and forall x (Distal(x) -> Fijian(x)) -> therefore Fijian(clementia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Percival is lifted. Sophi is generic. Sophi is dazed. If someone is unconfused and dazed then they are generic. Green, lifted people are sisyphean. Young, unconfused people are generic. If someone is honored then they are dazed. White, honored people are generic. If someone is dazed then they are sisyphean. Big, sisyphean people are unconfused. If someone is sisyphean and unconfused then they are lifted. Sophi is unconfused.", "logic": "\nLifted(percival)\nGeneric(sophi)\nDazed(sophi)\nforall x (Unconfused(x) and Dazed(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Honored(x) and Lifted(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Unconfused(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Honored(x) -> Dazed(x))\nforall x (Dazed(x) and Honored(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Dazed(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) and Sisyphean(x) -> Unconfused(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Unconfused(x) -> Lifted(x))\n\nUnconfused(sophi)\n\nDazed(sophi) and forall x (Dazed(x) -> Sisyphean(x)) -> therefore Sisyphean(sophi) Generic(sophi) and Sisyphean(sophi) and forall x (Generic(x) and Sisyphean(x) -> Unconfused(x)) -> therefore Unconfused(sophi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Amanda is triumphal. Rosalyn is branched. Rosalyn is undesiring. If someone is qabalistic and undesiring then they are branched. Green, triumphal people are tubercular. Young, qabalistic people are branched. If someone is autarchic then they are undesiring. White, autarchic people are branched. If someone is undesiring then they are tubercular. Big, tubercular people are qabalistic. If someone is tubercular and qabalistic then they are triumphal. Rosalyn is not qabalistic.", "logic": "\nTriumphal(amanda)\nBranched(rosalyn)\nUndesiring(rosalyn)\nforall x (Qabalistic(x) and Undesiring(x) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Autarchic(x) and Triumphal(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Triumphal(x) and Qabalistic(x) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Autarchic(x) -> Undesiring(x))\nforall x (Undesiring(x) and Autarchic(x) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Undesiring(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Branched(x) and Tubercular(x) -> Qabalistic(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) and Qabalistic(x) -> Triumphal(x))\n\nnot Qabalistic(rosalyn)\n\nUndesiring(rosalyn) and forall x (Undesiring(x) -> Tubercular(x)) -> therefore Tubercular(rosalyn) Branched(rosalyn) and Tubercular(rosalyn) and forall x (Branched(x) and Tubercular(x) -> Qabalistic(x)) -> therefore Qabalistic(rosalyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Arline is upmost. Sandi is dampish. Sandi is caffeinic. If someone is deepening and caffeinic then they are dampish. Green, upmost people are burdenless. Young, deepening people are dampish. If someone is mediated then they are caffeinic. White, mediated people are dampish. If someone is caffeinic then they are burdenless. Big, burdenless people are deepening. If someone is burdenless and deepening then they are upmost. Sandi is upmost.", "logic": "\nUpmost(arline)\nDampish(sandi)\nCaffeinic(sandi)\nforall x (Deepening(x) and Caffeinic(x) -> Dampish(x))\nforall x (Mediated(x) and Upmost(x) -> Burdenless(x))\nforall x (Upmost(x) and Deepening(x) -> Dampish(x))\nforall x (Mediated(x) -> Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Caffeinic(x) and Mediated(x) -> Dampish(x))\nforall x (Caffeinic(x) -> Burdenless(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Burdenless(x) -> Deepening(x))\nforall x (Burdenless(x) and Deepening(x) -> Upmost(x))\n\nUpmost(sandi)\n\nCaffeinic(sandi) and forall x (Caffeinic(x) -> Burdenless(x)) -> therefore Burdenless(sandi) Caffeinic(sandi) and forall x (Caffeinic(x) -> Burdenless(x)) -> therefore Burdenless(sandi) Dampish(sandi) and Burdenless(sandi) and forall x (Dampish(x) and Burdenless(x) -> Deepening(x)) -> therefore Deepening(sandi) Burdenless(sandi) and Deepening(sandi) and forall x (Burdenless(x) and Deepening(x) -> Upmost(x)) -> therefore Upmost(sandi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Hollis is sewed. Linet is trophic. Linet is tottery. If someone is unspoilt and tottery then they are trophic. Green, sewed people are filthy. Young, unspoilt people are trophic. If someone is pocked then they are tottery. White, pocked people are trophic. If someone is tottery then they are filthy. Big, filthy people are unspoilt. If someone is filthy and unspoilt then they are sewed. Linet is not sewed.", "logic": "\nSewed(hollis)\nTrophic(linet)\nTottery(linet)\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) and Tottery(x) -> Trophic(x))\nforall x (Pocked(x) and Sewed(x) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Sewed(x) and Unspoilt(x) -> Trophic(x))\nforall x (Pocked(x) -> Tottery(x))\nforall x (Tottery(x) and Pocked(x) -> Trophic(x))\nforall x (Tottery(x) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Trophic(x) and Filthy(x) -> Unspoilt(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) and Unspoilt(x) -> Sewed(x))\n\nnot Sewed(linet)\n\nTottery(linet) and forall x (Tottery(x) -> Filthy(x)) -> therefore Filthy(linet) Tottery(linet) and forall x (Tottery(x) -> Filthy(x)) -> therefore Filthy(linet) Trophic(linet) and Filthy(linet) and forall x (Trophic(x) and Filthy(x) -> Unspoilt(x)) -> therefore Unspoilt(linet) Filthy(linet) and Unspoilt(linet) and forall x (Filthy(x) and Unspoilt(x) -> Sewed(x)) -> therefore Sewed(linet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Crawford is hysterical. Niall is smoothed. Niall is meddlesome. If someone is southward and meddlesome then they are smoothed. Green, hysterical people are metatarsal. Young, southward people are smoothed. If someone is birchen then they are meddlesome. White, birchen people are smoothed. If someone is meddlesome then they are metatarsal. Big, metatarsal people are southward. If someone is metatarsal and southward then they are hysterical. Crawford is not meddlesome.", "logic": "\nHysterical(crawford)\nSmoothed(niall)\nMeddlesome(niall)\nforall x (Southward(x) and Meddlesome(x) -> Smoothed(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) and Hysterical(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\nforall x (Hysterical(x) and Southward(x) -> Smoothed(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) -> Meddlesome(x))\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) and Birchen(x) -> Smoothed(x))\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\nforall x (Smoothed(x) and Metatarsal(x) -> Southward(x))\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) and Southward(x) -> Hysterical(x))\n\nnot Meddlesome(crawford)\n\nforall x (Birchen(x) -> Meddlesome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Odetta is maniclike. Rozella is nonnatural. Rozella is copulatory. If someone is allomerous and copulatory then they are nonnatural. Green, maniclike people are marbleised. Young, allomerous people are nonnatural. If someone is atomistic then they are copulatory. White, atomistic people are nonnatural. If someone is copulatory then they are marbleised. Big, marbleised people are allomerous. If someone is marbleised and allomerous then they are maniclike. Odetta is marbleised.", "logic": "\nManiclike(odetta)\nNonnatural(rozella)\nCopulatory(rozella)\nforall x (Allomerous(x) and Copulatory(x) -> Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Atomistic(x) and Maniclike(x) -> Marbleised(x))\nforall x (Maniclike(x) and Allomerous(x) -> Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Atomistic(x) -> Copulatory(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) and Atomistic(x) -> Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) -> Marbleised(x))\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Marbleised(x) -> Allomerous(x))\nforall x (Marbleised(x) and Allomerous(x) -> Maniclike(x))\n\nMarbleised(odetta)\n\nforall x (Copulatory(x) -> Marbleised(x)) <- forall x (Atomistic(x) -> Copulatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Brynne is searching. Selena is cogent. Selena is grapy. If someone is flavorous and grapy then they are cogent. Green, searching people are acanthous. Young, flavorous people are cogent. If someone is gnomic then they are grapy. White, gnomic people are cogent. If someone is grapy then they are acanthous. Big, acanthous people are flavorous. If someone is acanthous and flavorous then they are searching. Brynne is not flavorous.", "logic": "\nSearching(brynne)\nCogent(selena)\nGrapy(selena)\nforall x (Flavorous(x) and Grapy(x) -> Cogent(x))\nforall x (Gnomic(x) and Searching(x) -> Acanthous(x))\nforall x (Searching(x) and Flavorous(x) -> Cogent(x))\nforall x (Gnomic(x) -> Grapy(x))\nforall x (Grapy(x) and Gnomic(x) -> Cogent(x))\nforall x (Grapy(x) -> Acanthous(x))\nforall x (Cogent(x) and Acanthous(x) -> Flavorous(x))\nforall x (Acanthous(x) and Flavorous(x) -> Searching(x))\n\nnot Flavorous(brynne)\n\nforall x (Cogent(x) and Acanthous(x) -> Flavorous(x)) <- forall x (Flavorous(x) and Grapy(x) -> Cogent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Seth is slashed. Doralyn is fulsome. Doralyn is spurned. If someone is heartfelt and spurned then they are fulsome. Green, slashed people are offstage. Young, heartfelt people are fulsome. If someone is whiskered then they are spurned. White, whiskered people are fulsome. If someone is spurned then they are offstage. Big, offstage people are heartfelt. If someone is offstage and heartfelt then they are slashed. Seth is fulsome.", "logic": "\nSlashed(seth)\nFulsome(doralyn)\nSpurned(doralyn)\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) and Spurned(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Whiskered(x) and Slashed(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Whiskered(x) -> Spurned(x))\nforall x (Spurned(x) and Whiskered(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Fulsome(x) and Offstage(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Offstage(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Slashed(x))\n\nFulsome(seth)\n\nforall x (Slashed(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Fulsome(x)) <- forall x (Fulsome(x) and Offstage(x) -> Heartfelt(x)) <- forall x (Heartfelt(x) and Spurned(x) -> Fulsome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Stanton is flowerless. Ingunna is upsetting. Ingunna is needled. If someone is cataphatic and needled then they are upsetting. Green, flowerless people are clayey. Young, cataphatic people are upsetting. If someone is pathless then they are needled. White, pathless people are upsetting. If someone is needled then they are clayey. Big, clayey people are cataphatic. If someone is clayey and cataphatic then they are flowerless. Stanton is not pathless.", "logic": "\nFlowerless(stanton)\nUpsetting(ingunna)\nNeedled(ingunna)\nforall x (Cataphatic(x) and Needled(x) -> Upsetting(x))\nforall x (Pathless(x) and Flowerless(x) -> Clayey(x))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) and Cataphatic(x) -> Upsetting(x))\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Needled(x) and Pathless(x) -> Upsetting(x))\nforall x (Needled(x) -> Clayey(x))\nforall x (Upsetting(x) and Clayey(x) -> Cataphatic(x))\nforall x (Clayey(x) and Cataphatic(x) -> Flowerless(x))\n\nnot Pathless(stanton)\n\nnot Pathless(stanton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Luke is cathedral. Alfred is curable. Alfred is fattening. If someone is gathered and fattening then they are curable. Green, cathedral people are holozoic. Young, gathered people are curable. If someone is geocentric then they are fattening. White, geocentric people are curable. If someone is fattening then they are holozoic. Big, holozoic people are gathered. If someone is holozoic and gathered then they are cathedral. Alfred is geocentric.", "logic": "\nCathedral(luke)\nCurable(alfred)\nFattening(alfred)\nforall x (Gathered(x) and Fattening(x) -> Curable(x))\nforall x (Geocentric(x) and Cathedral(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Gathered(x) -> Curable(x))\nforall x (Geocentric(x) -> Fattening(x))\nforall x (Fattening(x) and Geocentric(x) -> Curable(x))\nforall x (Fattening(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Curable(x) and Holozoic(x) -> Gathered(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) and Gathered(x) -> Cathedral(x))\n\nGeocentric(alfred)\n\nGeocentric(alfred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Katha is gratified. Vania is concerted. Vania is unfurrowed. If someone is reparable and unfurrowed then they are concerted. Green, gratified people are sought. Young, reparable people are concerted. If someone is marauding then they are unfurrowed. White, marauding people are concerted. If someone is unfurrowed then they are sought. Big, sought people are reparable. If someone is sought and reparable then they are gratified. Vania is not smart.", "logic": "\nGratified(katha)\nConcerted(vania)\nUnfurrowed(vania)\nforall x (Reparable(x) and Unfurrowed(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Gratified(x) -> Sought(x))\nforall x (Gratified(x) and Reparable(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Marauding(x) -> Unfurrowed(x))\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) and Marauding(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Sought(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) and Sought(x) -> Reparable(x))\nforall x (Sought(x) and Reparable(x) -> Gratified(x))\n\nnot Smart(vania)\n\nnot Smart(vania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Jervis is snappy. Norris is hooved. Norris is olfactory. If someone is feudatory and olfactory then they are hooved. Green, snappy people are vinous. Young, feudatory people are hooved. If someone is disposable then they are olfactory. White, disposable people are hooved. If someone is olfactory then they are vinous. Big, vinous people are feudatory. If someone is vinous and feudatory then they are snappy. Jervis is smart.", "logic": "\nSnappy(jervis)\nHooved(norris)\nOlfactory(norris)\nforall x (Feudatory(x) and Olfactory(x) -> Hooved(x))\nforall x (Disposable(x) and Snappy(x) -> Vinous(x))\nforall x (Snappy(x) and Feudatory(x) -> Hooved(x))\nforall x (Disposable(x) -> Olfactory(x))\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and Disposable(x) -> Hooved(x))\nforall x (Olfactory(x) -> Vinous(x))\nforall x (Hooved(x) and Vinous(x) -> Feudatory(x))\nforall x (Vinous(x) and Feudatory(x) -> Snappy(x))\n\nSmart(jervis)\n\nSmart(jervis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "The jessalyn is pondering. The jessalyn discount the ruth. The jessalyn aurify the ruth. The ruth spice the jessalyn. The ruth is dragging. The ruth discount the jessalyn. The ruth aurify the jessalyn. If something discount the jessalyn and the jessalyn discount the ruth then the jessalyn aurify the ruth. If something discount the jessalyn then the jessalyn spice the ruth. If the jessalyn spice the ruth then the jessalyn is keyless. If the jessalyn spice the ruth and the jessalyn discount the ruth then the ruth discount the jessalyn. If something aurify the jessalyn and it spice the ruth then it spice the jessalyn. If something is keyless and it spice the ruth then the ruth is keyless. The jessalyn is pondering.", "logic": "\nPondering(jessalyn)\nDiscount(jessalyn, ruth)\nAurify(jessalyn, ruth)\nSpice(ruth, jessalyn)\nDragging(ruth)\nDiscount(ruth, jessalyn)\nAurify(ruth, jessalyn)\nforall x (Discount(x, jessalyn) and Discount(jessalyn, ruth) -> Aurify(jessalyn, ruth))\nforall x (Discount(x, jessalyn) -> Spice(jessalyn, ruth))\nSpice(jessalyn, ruth) -> Keyless(jessalyn)\nSpice(jessalyn, ruth) and Discount(jessalyn, ruth) -> Discount(ruth, jessalyn)\nforall x (Aurify(x, jessalyn) and Spice(x, ruth) -> Spice(x, jessalyn))\nforall x (Keyless(x) and Spice(x, ruth) -> Keyless(ruth))\n\nPondering(jessalyn)\n\ntherefore Pondering(jessalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The dori is adsorptive. The dori emerge the gaspar. The dori disaffect the gaspar. The gaspar refracture the dori. The gaspar is teasing. The gaspar emerge the dori. The gaspar disaffect the dori. If something emerge the dori and the dori emerge the gaspar then the dori disaffect the gaspar. If something emerge the dori then the dori refracture the gaspar. If the dori refracture the gaspar then the dori is hurried. If the dori refracture the gaspar and the dori emerge the gaspar then the gaspar emerge the dori. If something disaffect the dori and it refracture the gaspar then it refracture the dori. If something is hurried and it refracture the gaspar then the gaspar is hurried. The gaspar does not visit the dori.", "logic": "\nAdsorptive(dori)\nEmerge(dori, gaspar)\nDisaffect(dori, gaspar)\nRefracture(gaspar, dori)\nTeasing(gaspar)\nEmerge(gaspar, dori)\nDisaffect(gaspar, dori)\nforall x (Emerge(x, dori) and Emerge(dori, gaspar) -> Disaffect(dori, gaspar))\nforall x (Emerge(x, dori) -> Refracture(dori, gaspar))\nRefracture(dori, gaspar) -> Hurried(dori)\nRefracture(dori, gaspar) and Emerge(dori, gaspar) -> Emerge(gaspar, dori)\nforall x (Disaffect(x, dori) and Refracture(x, gaspar) -> Refracture(x, dori))\nforall x (Hurried(x) and Refracture(x, gaspar) -> Hurried(gaspar))\n\nnot Disaffect(gaspar, dori)\n\ntherefore Disaffect(gaspar, dori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The danette is lengthy. The danette zone the mariya. The danette stigmatize the mariya. The mariya foster the danette. The mariya is parabolic. The mariya zone the danette. The mariya stigmatize the danette. If something zone the danette and the danette zone the mariya then the danette stigmatize the mariya. If something zone the danette then the danette foster the mariya. If the danette foster the mariya then the danette is roofless. If the danette foster the mariya and the danette zone the mariya then the mariya zone the danette. If something stigmatize the danette and it foster the mariya then it foster the danette. If something is roofless and it foster the mariya then the mariya is roofless. The danette foster the mariya.", "logic": "\nLengthy(danette)\nZone(danette, mariya)\nStigmatize(danette, mariya)\nFoster(mariya, danette)\nParabolic(mariya)\nZone(mariya, danette)\nStigmatize(mariya, danette)\nforall x (Zone(x, danette) and Zone(danette, mariya) -> Stigmatize(danette, mariya))\nforall x (Zone(x, danette) -> Foster(danette, mariya))\nFoster(danette, mariya) -> Roofless(danette)\nFoster(danette, mariya) and Zone(danette, mariya) -> Zone(mariya, danette)\nforall x (Stigmatize(x, danette) and Foster(x, mariya) -> Foster(x, danette))\nforall x (Roofless(x) and Foster(x, mariya) -> Roofless(mariya))\n\nFoster(danette, mariya)\n\nZone(mariya, danette) and forall x (Zone(x, danette) -> Foster(danette, mariya)) -> therefore Foster(danette, mariya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The harriott is described. The harriott croquet the aggi. The harriott redeposit the aggi. The aggi dehydrate the harriott. The aggi is planate. The aggi croquet the harriott. The aggi redeposit the harriott. If something croquet the harriott and the harriott croquet the aggi then the harriott redeposit the aggi. If something croquet the harriott then the harriott dehydrate the aggi. If the harriott dehydrate the aggi then the harriott is pustulate. If the harriott dehydrate the aggi and the harriott croquet the aggi then the aggi croquet the harriott. If something redeposit the harriott and it dehydrate the aggi then it dehydrate the harriott. If something is pustulate and it dehydrate the aggi then the aggi is pustulate. The harriott does not eat the aggi.", "logic": "\nDescribed(harriott)\nCroquet(harriott, aggi)\nRedeposit(harriott, aggi)\nDehydrate(aggi, harriott)\nPlanate(aggi)\nCroquet(aggi, harriott)\nRedeposit(aggi, harriott)\nforall x (Croquet(x, harriott) and Croquet(harriott, aggi) -> Redeposit(harriott, aggi))\nforall x (Croquet(x, harriott) -> Dehydrate(harriott, aggi))\nDehydrate(harriott, aggi) -> Pustulate(harriott)\nDehydrate(harriott, aggi) and Croquet(harriott, aggi) -> Croquet(aggi, harriott)\nforall x (Redeposit(x, harriott) and Dehydrate(x, aggi) -> Dehydrate(x, harriott))\nforall x (Pustulate(x) and Dehydrate(x, aggi) -> Pustulate(aggi))\n\nnot Dehydrate(harriott, aggi)\n\nCroquet(aggi, harriott) and forall x (Croquet(x, harriott) -> Dehydrate(harriott, aggi)) -> therefore Dehydrate(harriott, aggi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The ianthe is bastard. The ianthe entail the pia. The ianthe scrounge the pia. The pia brighten the ianthe. The pia is squarish. The pia entail the ianthe. The pia scrounge the ianthe. If something entail the ianthe and the ianthe entail the pia then the ianthe scrounge the pia. If something entail the ianthe then the ianthe brighten the pia. If the ianthe brighten the pia then the ianthe is filmed. If the ianthe brighten the pia and the ianthe entail the pia then the pia entail the ianthe. If something scrounge the ianthe and it brighten the pia then it brighten the ianthe. If something is filmed and it brighten the pia then the pia is filmed. The ianthe is filmed.", "logic": "\nBastard(ianthe)\nEntail(ianthe, pia)\nScrounge(ianthe, pia)\nBrighten(pia, ianthe)\nSquarish(pia)\nEntail(pia, ianthe)\nScrounge(pia, ianthe)\nforall x (Entail(x, ianthe) and Entail(ianthe, pia) -> Scrounge(ianthe, pia))\nforall x (Entail(x, ianthe) -> Brighten(ianthe, pia))\nBrighten(ianthe, pia) -> Filmed(ianthe)\nBrighten(ianthe, pia) and Entail(ianthe, pia) -> Entail(pia, ianthe)\nforall x (Scrounge(x, ianthe) and Brighten(x, pia) -> Brighten(x, ianthe))\nforall x (Filmed(x) and Brighten(x, pia) -> Filmed(pia))\n\nFilmed(ianthe)\n\nEntail(pia, ianthe) and forall x (Entail(x, ianthe) -> Brighten(ianthe, pia)) -> therefore Brighten(ianthe, pia) Brighten(ianthe, pia) and Brighten(ianthe, pia) -> Filmed(ianthe) -> therefore Filmed(ianthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The ardyce is sacerdotal. The ardyce ping the agace. The ardyce paralyze the agace. The agace enclose the ardyce. The agace is cultural. The agace ping the ardyce. The agace paralyze the ardyce. If something ping the ardyce and the ardyce ping the agace then the ardyce paralyze the agace. If something ping the ardyce then the ardyce enclose the agace. If the ardyce enclose the agace then the ardyce is compatible. If the ardyce enclose the agace and the ardyce ping the agace then the agace ping the ardyce. If something paralyze the ardyce and it enclose the agace then it enclose the ardyce. If something is compatible and it enclose the agace then the agace is compatible. The ardyce is not compatible.", "logic": "\nSacerdotal(ardyce)\nPing(ardyce, agace)\nParalyze(ardyce, agace)\nEnclose(agace, ardyce)\nCultural(agace)\nPing(agace, ardyce)\nParalyze(agace, ardyce)\nforall x (Ping(x, ardyce) and Ping(ardyce, agace) -> Paralyze(ardyce, agace))\nforall x (Ping(x, ardyce) -> Enclose(ardyce, agace))\nEnclose(ardyce, agace) -> Compatible(ardyce)\nEnclose(ardyce, agace) and Ping(ardyce, agace) -> Ping(agace, ardyce)\nforall x (Paralyze(x, ardyce) and Enclose(x, agace) -> Enclose(x, ardyce))\nforall x (Compatible(x) and Enclose(x, agace) -> Compatible(agace))\n\nnot Compatible(ardyce)\n\nPing(agace, ardyce) and forall x (Ping(x, ardyce) -> Enclose(ardyce, agace)) -> therefore Enclose(ardyce, agace) Enclose(ardyce, agace) and Enclose(ardyce, agace) -> Compatible(ardyce) -> therefore Compatible(ardyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The breena is ammoniacal. The breena beef the mayda. The breena schnorr the mayda. The mayda glamorize the breena. The mayda is tasty. The mayda beef the breena. The mayda schnorr the breena. If something beef the breena and the breena beef the mayda then the breena schnorr the mayda. If something beef the breena then the breena glamorize the mayda. If the breena glamorize the mayda then the breena is womanly. If the breena glamorize the mayda and the breena beef the mayda then the mayda beef the breena. If something schnorr the breena and it glamorize the mayda then it glamorize the breena. If something is womanly and it glamorize the mayda then the mayda is womanly. The mayda is womanly.", "logic": "\nAmmoniacal(breena)\nBeef(breena, mayda)\nSchnorr(breena, mayda)\nGlamorize(mayda, breena)\nTasty(mayda)\nBeef(mayda, breena)\nSchnorr(mayda, breena)\nforall x (Beef(x, breena) and Beef(breena, mayda) -> Schnorr(breena, mayda))\nforall x (Beef(x, breena) -> Glamorize(breena, mayda))\nGlamorize(breena, mayda) -> Womanly(breena)\nGlamorize(breena, mayda) and Beef(breena, mayda) -> Beef(mayda, breena)\nforall x (Schnorr(x, breena) and Glamorize(x, mayda) -> Glamorize(x, breena))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Glamorize(x, mayda) -> Womanly(mayda))\n\nWomanly(mayda)\n\nBeef(mayda, breena) and forall x (Beef(x, breena) -> Glamorize(breena, mayda)) -> therefore Glamorize(breena, mayda) Glamorize(breena, mayda) and Glamorize(breena, mayda) -> Womanly(breena) -> therefore Womanly(breena) Beef(mayda, breena) and forall x (Beef(x, breena) -> Glamorize(breena, mayda)) -> therefore Glamorize(breena, mayda) Womanly(breena) and Glamorize(breena, mayda) and forall x (Womanly(x) and Glamorize(x, mayda) -> Womanly(mayda)) -> therefore Womanly(mayda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The parker is unbleached. The parker abide the virginia. The parker trace the virginia. The virginia apostatise the parker. The virginia is nonionized. The virginia abide the parker. The virginia trace the parker. If something abide the parker and the parker abide the virginia then the parker trace the virginia. If something abide the parker then the parker apostatise the virginia. If the parker apostatise the virginia then the parker is transitive. If the parker apostatise the virginia and the parker abide the virginia then the virginia abide the parker. If something trace the parker and it apostatise the virginia then it apostatise the parker. If something is transitive and it apostatise the virginia then the virginia is transitive. The virginia is not transitive.", "logic": "\nUnbleached(parker)\nAbide(parker, virginia)\nTrace(parker, virginia)\nApostatise(virginia, parker)\nNonionized(virginia)\nAbide(virginia, parker)\nTrace(virginia, parker)\nforall x (Abide(x, parker) and Abide(parker, virginia) -> Trace(parker, virginia))\nforall x (Abide(x, parker) -> Apostatise(parker, virginia))\nApostatise(parker, virginia) -> Transitive(parker)\nApostatise(parker, virginia) and Abide(parker, virginia) -> Abide(virginia, parker)\nforall x (Trace(x, parker) and Apostatise(x, virginia) -> Apostatise(x, parker))\nforall x (Transitive(x) and Apostatise(x, virginia) -> Transitive(virginia))\n\nnot Transitive(virginia)\n\nAbide(virginia, parker) and forall x (Abide(x, parker) -> Apostatise(parker, virginia)) -> therefore Apostatise(parker, virginia) Apostatise(parker, virginia) and Apostatise(parker, virginia) -> Transitive(parker) -> therefore Transitive(parker) Abide(virginia, parker) and forall x (Abide(x, parker) -> Apostatise(parker, virginia)) -> therefore Apostatise(parker, virginia) Transitive(parker) and Apostatise(parker, virginia) and forall x (Transitive(x) and Apostatise(x, virginia) -> Transitive(virginia)) -> therefore Transitive(virginia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The dalenna is augmented. The dalenna brecciate the trudi. The dalenna dull the trudi. The trudi perform the dalenna. The trudi is earthborn. The trudi brecciate the dalenna. The trudi dull the dalenna. If something brecciate the dalenna and the dalenna brecciate the trudi then the dalenna dull the trudi. If something brecciate the dalenna then the dalenna perform the trudi. If the dalenna perform the trudi then the dalenna is nettled. If the dalenna perform the trudi and the dalenna brecciate the trudi then the trudi brecciate the dalenna. If something dull the dalenna and it perform the trudi then it perform the dalenna. If something is nettled and it perform the trudi then the trudi is nettled. The dalenna does not eat the dalenna.", "logic": "\nAugmented(dalenna)\nBrecciate(dalenna, trudi)\nDull(dalenna, trudi)\nPerform(trudi, dalenna)\nEarthborn(trudi)\nBrecciate(trudi, dalenna)\nDull(trudi, dalenna)\nforall x (Brecciate(x, dalenna) and Brecciate(dalenna, trudi) -> Dull(dalenna, trudi))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, dalenna) -> Perform(dalenna, trudi))\nPerform(dalenna, trudi) -> Nettled(dalenna)\nPerform(dalenna, trudi) and Brecciate(dalenna, trudi) -> Brecciate(trudi, dalenna)\nforall x (Dull(x, dalenna) and Perform(x, trudi) -> Perform(x, dalenna))\nforall x (Nettled(x) and Perform(x, trudi) -> Nettled(trudi))\n\nnot Perform(dalenna, dalenna)\n\nforall x (Dull(x, dalenna) and Perform(x, trudi) -> Perform(x, dalenna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The carlota is cinnabar. The carlota asterisk the page. The carlota deflect the page. The page fuse the carlota. The page is longish. The page asterisk the carlota. The page deflect the carlota. If something asterisk the carlota and the carlota asterisk the page then the carlota deflect the page. If something asterisk the carlota then the carlota fuse the page. If the carlota fuse the page then the carlota is smoky. If the carlota fuse the page and the carlota asterisk the page then the page asterisk the carlota. If something deflect the carlota and it fuse the page then it fuse the carlota. If something is smoky and it fuse the page then the page is smoky. The carlota is big.", "logic": "\nCinnabar(carlota)\nAsterisk(carlota, page)\nDeflect(carlota, page)\nFuse(page, carlota)\nLongish(page)\nAsterisk(page, carlota)\nDeflect(page, carlota)\nforall x (Asterisk(x, carlota) and Asterisk(carlota, page) -> Deflect(carlota, page))\nforall x (Asterisk(x, carlota) -> Fuse(carlota, page))\nFuse(carlota, page) -> Smoky(carlota)\nFuse(carlota, page) and Asterisk(carlota, page) -> Asterisk(page, carlota)\nforall x (Deflect(x, carlota) and Fuse(x, page) -> Fuse(x, carlota))\nforall x (Smoky(x) and Fuse(x, page) -> Smoky(page))\n\nBig(carlota)\n\nBig(carlota) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The zorro is annual. The zorro paginate the renado. The zorro whiten the renado. The renado covet the zorro. The renado is xxxvi. The renado paginate the zorro. The renado whiten the zorro. If something paginate the zorro and the zorro paginate the renado then the zorro whiten the renado. If something paginate the zorro then the zorro covet the renado. If the zorro covet the renado then the zorro is untoasted. If the zorro covet the renado and the zorro paginate the renado then the renado paginate the zorro. If something whiten the zorro and it covet the renado then it covet the zorro. If something is untoasted and it covet the renado then the renado is untoasted. The zorro does not visit the zorro.", "logic": "\nAnnual(zorro)\nPaginate(zorro, renado)\nWhiten(zorro, renado)\nCovet(renado, zorro)\nXxxvi(renado)\nPaginate(renado, zorro)\nWhiten(renado, zorro)\nforall x (Paginate(x, zorro) and Paginate(zorro, renado) -> Whiten(zorro, renado))\nforall x (Paginate(x, zorro) -> Covet(zorro, renado))\nCovet(zorro, renado) -> Untoasted(zorro)\nCovet(zorro, renado) and Paginate(zorro, renado) -> Paginate(renado, zorro)\nforall x (Whiten(x, zorro) and Covet(x, renado) -> Covet(x, zorro))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) and Covet(x, renado) -> Untoasted(renado))\n\nnot Whiten(zorro, zorro)\n\nnot Whiten(zorro, zorro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The devondra is unfeeling. The devondra chap the vivia. The devondra diet the vivia. The vivia wither the devondra. The vivia is donnean. The vivia chap the devondra. The vivia diet the devondra. If something chap the devondra and the devondra chap the vivia then the devondra diet the vivia. If something chap the devondra then the devondra wither the vivia. If the devondra wither the vivia then the devondra is indirect. If the devondra wither the vivia and the devondra chap the vivia then the vivia chap the devondra. If something diet the devondra and it wither the vivia then it wither the devondra. If something is indirect and it wither the vivia then the vivia is indirect. The vivia wither the vivia.", "logic": "\nUnfeeling(devondra)\nChap(devondra, vivia)\nDiet(devondra, vivia)\nWither(vivia, devondra)\nDonnean(vivia)\nChap(vivia, devondra)\nDiet(vivia, devondra)\nforall x (Chap(x, devondra) and Chap(devondra, vivia) -> Diet(devondra, vivia))\nforall x (Chap(x, devondra) -> Wither(devondra, vivia))\nWither(devondra, vivia) -> Indirect(devondra)\nWither(devondra, vivia) and Chap(devondra, vivia) -> Chap(vivia, devondra)\nforall x (Diet(x, devondra) and Wither(x, vivia) -> Wither(x, devondra))\nforall x (Indirect(x) and Wither(x, vivia) -> Indirect(vivia))\n\nWither(vivia, vivia)\n\nWither(vivia, vivia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The berkie is acidotic. The berkie detain the cain. The berkie ranch the cain. The cain desquamate the berkie. The cain is botulinal. The cain detain the berkie. The cain ranch the berkie. If something detain the berkie and the berkie detain the cain then the berkie ranch the cain. If something detain the berkie then the berkie desquamate the cain. If the berkie desquamate the cain then the berkie is distressed. If the berkie desquamate the cain and the berkie detain the cain then the cain detain the berkie. If something ranch the berkie and it desquamate the cain then it desquamate the berkie. If something is distressed and it desquamate the cain then the cain is distressed. The berkie is not botulinal.", "logic": "\nAcidotic(berkie)\nDetain(berkie, cain)\nRanch(berkie, cain)\nDesquamate(cain, berkie)\nBotulinal(cain)\nDetain(cain, berkie)\nRanch(cain, berkie)\nforall x (Detain(x, berkie) and Detain(berkie, cain) -> Ranch(berkie, cain))\nforall x (Detain(x, berkie) -> Desquamate(berkie, cain))\nDesquamate(berkie, cain) -> Distressed(berkie)\nDesquamate(berkie, cain) and Detain(berkie, cain) -> Detain(cain, berkie)\nforall x (Ranch(x, berkie) and Desquamate(x, cain) -> Desquamate(x, berkie))\nforall x (Distressed(x) and Desquamate(x, cain) -> Distressed(cain))\n\nnot Botulinal(berkie)\n\nnot Botulinal(berkie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The teodoor is brachial. The teodoor favor the cherish. The teodoor invalidate the cherish. The cherish upend the teodoor. The cherish is auburn. The cherish favor the teodoor. The cherish invalidate the teodoor. If something favor the teodoor and the teodoor favor the cherish then the teodoor invalidate the cherish. If something favor the teodoor then the teodoor upend the cherish. If the teodoor upend the cherish then the teodoor is annexal. If the teodoor upend the cherish and the teodoor favor the cherish then the cherish favor the teodoor. If something invalidate the teodoor and it upend the cherish then it upend the teodoor. If something is annexal and it upend the cherish then the cherish is annexal. The cherish invalidate the cherish.", "logic": "\nBrachial(teodoor)\nFavor(teodoor, cherish)\nInvalidate(teodoor, cherish)\nUpend(cherish, teodoor)\nAuburn(cherish)\nFavor(cherish, teodoor)\nInvalidate(cherish, teodoor)\nforall x (Favor(x, teodoor) and Favor(teodoor, cherish) -> Invalidate(teodoor, cherish))\nforall x (Favor(x, teodoor) -> Upend(teodoor, cherish))\nUpend(teodoor, cherish) -> Annexal(teodoor)\nUpend(teodoor, cherish) and Favor(teodoor, cherish) -> Favor(cherish, teodoor)\nforall x (Invalidate(x, teodoor) and Upend(x, cherish) -> Upend(x, teodoor))\nforall x (Annexal(x) and Upend(x, cherish) -> Annexal(cherish))\n\nInvalidate(cherish, cherish)\n\nInvalidate(cherish, cherish) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The maisie is ischaemic. The maisie gluttonise the genna. The maisie disrobe the genna. The genna weight the maisie. The genna is uptown. The genna gluttonise the maisie. The genna disrobe the maisie. If something gluttonise the maisie and the maisie gluttonise the genna then the maisie disrobe the genna. If something gluttonise the maisie then the maisie weight the genna. If the maisie weight the genna then the maisie is flowerless. If the maisie weight the genna and the maisie gluttonise the genna then the genna gluttonise the maisie. If something disrobe the maisie and it weight the genna then it weight the maisie. If something is flowerless and it weight the genna then the genna is flowerless. The maisie does not see the maisie.", "logic": "\nIschaemic(maisie)\nGluttonise(maisie, genna)\nDisrobe(maisie, genna)\nWeight(genna, maisie)\nUptown(genna)\nGluttonise(genna, maisie)\nDisrobe(genna, maisie)\nforall x (Gluttonise(x, maisie) and Gluttonise(maisie, genna) -> Disrobe(maisie, genna))\nforall x (Gluttonise(x, maisie) -> Weight(maisie, genna))\nWeight(maisie, genna) -> Flowerless(maisie)\nWeight(maisie, genna) and Gluttonise(maisie, genna) -> Gluttonise(genna, maisie)\nforall x (Disrobe(x, maisie) and Weight(x, genna) -> Weight(x, maisie))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) and Weight(x, genna) -> Flowerless(genna))\n\nnot Gluttonise(maisie, maisie)\n\nnot Gluttonise(maisie, maisie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The roland is philippine. The roland visa the moss. The roland carjack the moss. The moss spurt the roland. The moss is bonnie. The moss visa the roland. The moss carjack the roland. If something visa the roland and the roland visa the moss then the roland carjack the moss. If something visa the roland then the roland spurt the moss. If the roland spurt the moss then the roland is resilient. If the roland spurt the moss and the roland visa the moss then the moss visa the roland. If something carjack the roland and it spurt the moss then it spurt the roland. If something is resilient and it spurt the moss then the moss is resilient. The roland is green.", "logic": "\nPhilippine(roland)\nVisa(roland, moss)\nCarjack(roland, moss)\nSpurt(moss, roland)\nBonnie(moss)\nVisa(moss, roland)\nCarjack(moss, roland)\nforall x (Visa(x, roland) and Visa(roland, moss) -> Carjack(roland, moss))\nforall x (Visa(x, roland) -> Spurt(roland, moss))\nSpurt(roland, moss) -> Resilient(roland)\nSpurt(roland, moss) and Visa(roland, moss) -> Visa(moss, roland)\nforall x (Carjack(x, roland) and Spurt(x, moss) -> Spurt(x, roland))\nforall x (Resilient(x) and Spurt(x, moss) -> Resilient(moss))\n\nGreen(roland)\n\nGreen(roland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The oliver fornicate the flemming. The oliver is tentacled. The oliver stumble the melvyn. The melvyn fornicate the oliver. The melvyn is tentacled. The melvyn roam the flemming. The melvyn roam the elka. The flemming fornicate the melvyn. The flemming is tentacled. The elka fornicate the melvyn. The elka fornicate the flemming. The elka is couthie. If someone fornicate the melvyn then they are saute. If someone is tentacled and they do not chase the elka then the elka does not see the oliver. If someone is saute and they do not chase the elka then the elka fornicate the melvyn. If the oliver stumble the flemming then the oliver roam the elka. If someone stumble the flemming and they do not chase the flemming then they need the elka. If someone stumble the flemming and they chase the flemming then the flemming is couthie. If someone is saute then they need the flemming. If someone is saute and they do not need the flemming then they do not see the flemming. The melvyn is tentacled.", "logic": "\nFornicate(oliver, flemming)\nTentacled(oliver)\nStumble(oliver, melvyn)\nFornicate(melvyn, oliver)\nTentacled(melvyn)\nRoam(melvyn, flemming)\nRoam(melvyn, elka)\nFornicate(flemming, melvyn)\nTentacled(flemming)\nFornicate(elka, melvyn)\nFornicate(elka, flemming)\nCouthie(elka)\nforall x (Fornicate(x, melvyn) -> Saute(x))\nforall x (Tentacled(x) and not Fornicate(x, elka) -> not Roam(elka, oliver))\nforall x (Saute(x) and not Fornicate(x, elka) -> Fornicate(elka, melvyn))\nStumble(oliver, flemming) -> Roam(oliver, elka)\nforall x (Stumble(x, flemming) and not Fornicate(x, flemming) -> Stumble(x, elka))\nforall x (Stumble(x, flemming) and Fornicate(x, flemming) -> Couthie(flemming))\nforall x (Saute(x) -> Stumble(x, flemming))\nforall x (Saute(x) and not Stumble(x, flemming) -> not Roam(x, flemming))\n\nTentacled(melvyn)\n\ntherefore Tentacled(melvyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The kincaid surface the tatiania. The kincaid is buttony. The kincaid fumigate the karina. The karina surface the kincaid. The karina is buttony. The karina batch the tatiania. The karina batch the kori. The tatiania surface the karina. The tatiania is buttony. The kori surface the karina. The kori surface the tatiania. The kori is footsore. If someone surface the karina then they are nodulose. If someone is buttony and they do not chase the kori then the kori does not see the kincaid. If someone is nodulose and they do not chase the kori then the kori surface the karina. If the kincaid fumigate the tatiania then the kincaid batch the kori. If someone fumigate the tatiania and they do not chase the tatiania then they need the kori. If someone fumigate the tatiania and they chase the tatiania then the tatiania is footsore. If someone is nodulose then they need the tatiania. If someone is nodulose and they do not need the tatiania then they do not see the tatiania. The kori does not chase the karina.", "logic": "\nSurface(kincaid, tatiania)\nButtony(kincaid)\nFumigate(kincaid, karina)\nSurface(karina, kincaid)\nButtony(karina)\nBatch(karina, tatiania)\nBatch(karina, kori)\nSurface(tatiania, karina)\nButtony(tatiania)\nSurface(kori, karina)\nSurface(kori, tatiania)\nFootsore(kori)\nforall x (Surface(x, karina) -> Nodulose(x))\nforall x (Buttony(x) and not Surface(x, kori) -> not Batch(kori, kincaid))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) and not Surface(x, kori) -> Surface(kori, karina))\nFumigate(kincaid, tatiania) -> Batch(kincaid, kori)\nforall x (Fumigate(x, tatiania) and not Surface(x, tatiania) -> Fumigate(x, kori))\nforall x (Fumigate(x, tatiania) and Surface(x, tatiania) -> Footsore(tatiania))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Fumigate(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) and not Fumigate(x, tatiania) -> not Batch(x, tatiania))\n\nnot Surface(kori, karina)\n\ntherefore Surface(kori, karina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The cherie pommel the homer. The cherie is partitive. The cherie rasterize the vena. The vena pommel the cherie. The vena is partitive. The vena swagger the homer. The vena swagger the arabela. The homer pommel the vena. The homer is partitive. The arabela pommel the vena. The arabela pommel the homer. The arabela is idempotent. If someone pommel the vena then they are sissified. If someone is partitive and they do not chase the arabela then the arabela does not see the cherie. If someone is sissified and they do not chase the arabela then the arabela pommel the vena. If the cherie rasterize the homer then the cherie swagger the arabela. If someone rasterize the homer and they do not chase the homer then they need the arabela. If someone rasterize the homer and they chase the homer then the homer is idempotent. If someone is sissified then they need the homer. If someone is sissified and they do not need the homer then they do not see the homer. The homer is sissified.", "logic": "\nPommel(cherie, homer)\nPartitive(cherie)\nRasterize(cherie, vena)\nPommel(vena, cherie)\nPartitive(vena)\nSwagger(vena, homer)\nSwagger(vena, arabela)\nPommel(homer, vena)\nPartitive(homer)\nPommel(arabela, vena)\nPommel(arabela, homer)\nIdempotent(arabela)\nforall x (Pommel(x, vena) -> Sissified(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) and not Pommel(x, arabela) -> not Swagger(arabela, cherie))\nforall x (Sissified(x) and not Pommel(x, arabela) -> Pommel(arabela, vena))\nRasterize(cherie, homer) -> Swagger(cherie, arabela)\nforall x (Rasterize(x, homer) and not Pommel(x, homer) -> Rasterize(x, arabela))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, homer) and Pommel(x, homer) -> Idempotent(homer))\nforall x (Sissified(x) -> Rasterize(x, homer))\nforall x (Sissified(x) and not Rasterize(x, homer) -> not Swagger(x, homer))\n\nSissified(homer)\n\nPommel(homer, vena) and forall x (Pommel(x, vena) -> Sissified(x)) -> therefore Sissified(homer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The dahlia dizen the mateo. The dahlia is nascent. The dahlia protrude the forest. The forest dizen the dahlia. The forest is nascent. The forest perplex the mateo. The forest perplex the debee. The mateo dizen the forest. The mateo is nascent. The debee dizen the forest. The debee dizen the mateo. The debee is wellborn. If someone dizen the forest then they are forgotten. If someone is nascent and they do not chase the debee then the debee does not see the dahlia. If someone is forgotten and they do not chase the debee then the debee dizen the forest. If the dahlia protrude the mateo then the dahlia perplex the debee. If someone protrude the mateo and they do not chase the mateo then they need the debee. If someone protrude the mateo and they chase the mateo then the mateo is wellborn. If someone is forgotten then they need the mateo. If someone is forgotten and they do not need the mateo then they do not see the mateo. The mateo is not forgotten.", "logic": "\nDizen(dahlia, mateo)\nNascent(dahlia)\nProtrude(dahlia, forest)\nDizen(forest, dahlia)\nNascent(forest)\nPerplex(forest, mateo)\nPerplex(forest, debee)\nDizen(mateo, forest)\nNascent(mateo)\nDizen(debee, forest)\nDizen(debee, mateo)\nWellborn(debee)\nforall x (Dizen(x, forest) -> Forgotten(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and not Dizen(x, debee) -> not Perplex(debee, dahlia))\nforall x (Forgotten(x) and not Dizen(x, debee) -> Dizen(debee, forest))\nProtrude(dahlia, mateo) -> Perplex(dahlia, debee)\nforall x (Protrude(x, mateo) and not Dizen(x, mateo) -> Protrude(x, debee))\nforall x (Protrude(x, mateo) and Dizen(x, mateo) -> Wellborn(mateo))\nforall x (Forgotten(x) -> Protrude(x, mateo))\nforall x (Forgotten(x) and not Protrude(x, mateo) -> not Perplex(x, mateo))\n\nnot Forgotten(mateo)\n\nDizen(mateo, forest) and forall x (Dizen(x, forest) -> Forgotten(x)) -> therefore Forgotten(mateo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The anitra bung the cornie. The anitra is recyclable. The anitra frock the ronnica. The ronnica bung the anitra. The ronnica is recyclable. The ronnica bemire the cornie. The ronnica bemire the wini. The cornie bung the ronnica. The cornie is recyclable. The wini bung the ronnica. The wini bung the cornie. The wini is acid. If someone bung the ronnica then they are abandoned. If someone is recyclable and they do not chase the wini then the wini does not see the anitra. If someone is abandoned and they do not chase the wini then the wini bung the ronnica. If the anitra frock the cornie then the anitra bemire the wini. If someone frock the cornie and they do not chase the cornie then they need the wini. If someone frock the cornie and they chase the cornie then the cornie is acid. If someone is abandoned then they need the cornie. If someone is abandoned and they do not need the cornie then they do not see the cornie. The cornie frock the cornie.", "logic": "\nBung(anitra, cornie)\nRecyclable(anitra)\nFrock(anitra, ronnica)\nBung(ronnica, anitra)\nRecyclable(ronnica)\nBemire(ronnica, cornie)\nBemire(ronnica, wini)\nBung(cornie, ronnica)\nRecyclable(cornie)\nBung(wini, ronnica)\nBung(wini, cornie)\nAcid(wini)\nforall x (Bung(x, ronnica) -> Abandoned(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) and not Bung(x, wini) -> not Bemire(wini, anitra))\nforall x (Abandoned(x) and not Bung(x, wini) -> Bung(wini, ronnica))\nFrock(anitra, cornie) -> Bemire(anitra, wini)\nforall x (Frock(x, cornie) and not Bung(x, cornie) -> Frock(x, wini))\nforall x (Frock(x, cornie) and Bung(x, cornie) -> Acid(cornie))\nforall x (Abandoned(x) -> Frock(x, cornie))\nforall x (Abandoned(x) and not Frock(x, cornie) -> not Bemire(x, cornie))\n\nFrock(cornie, cornie)\n\nBung(cornie, ronnica) and forall x (Bung(x, ronnica) -> Abandoned(x)) -> therefore Abandoned(cornie) Abandoned(cornie) and forall x (Abandoned(x) -> Frock(x, cornie)) -> therefore Frock(cornie, cornie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The ansley divide the yehudi. The ansley is occupied. The ansley harm the julianne. The julianne divide the ansley. The julianne is occupied. The julianne gabble the yehudi. The julianne gabble the leonard. The yehudi divide the julianne. The yehudi is occupied. The leonard divide the julianne. The leonard divide the yehudi. The leonard is declarable. If someone divide the julianne then they are actinoid. If someone is occupied and they do not chase the leonard then the leonard does not see the ansley. If someone is actinoid and they do not chase the leonard then the leonard divide the julianne. If the ansley harm the yehudi then the ansley gabble the leonard. If someone harm the yehudi and they do not chase the yehudi then they need the leonard. If someone harm the yehudi and they chase the yehudi then the yehudi is declarable. If someone is actinoid then they need the yehudi. If someone is actinoid and they do not need the yehudi then they do not see the yehudi. The leonard does not need the yehudi.", "logic": "\nDivide(ansley, yehudi)\nOccupied(ansley)\nHarm(ansley, julianne)\nDivide(julianne, ansley)\nOccupied(julianne)\nGabble(julianne, yehudi)\nGabble(julianne, leonard)\nDivide(yehudi, julianne)\nOccupied(yehudi)\nDivide(leonard, julianne)\nDivide(leonard, yehudi)\nDeclarable(leonard)\nforall x (Divide(x, julianne) -> Actinoid(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) and not Divide(x, leonard) -> not Gabble(leonard, ansley))\nforall x (Actinoid(x) and not Divide(x, leonard) -> Divide(leonard, julianne))\nHarm(ansley, yehudi) -> Gabble(ansley, leonard)\nforall x (Harm(x, yehudi) and not Divide(x, yehudi) -> Harm(x, leonard))\nforall x (Harm(x, yehudi) and Divide(x, yehudi) -> Declarable(yehudi))\nforall x (Actinoid(x) -> Harm(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Actinoid(x) and not Harm(x, yehudi) -> not Gabble(x, yehudi))\n\nnot Harm(leonard, yehudi)\n\nDivide(leonard, julianne) and forall x (Divide(x, julianne) -> Actinoid(x)) -> therefore Actinoid(leonard) Actinoid(leonard) and forall x (Actinoid(x) -> Harm(x, yehudi)) -> therefore Harm(leonard, yehudi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The clarissa conge the zsazsa. The clarissa is offhand. The clarissa observe the danni. The danni conge the clarissa. The danni is offhand. The danni inunct the zsazsa. The danni inunct the catlaina. The zsazsa conge the danni. The zsazsa is offhand. The catlaina conge the danni. The catlaina conge the zsazsa. The catlaina is corrigible. If someone conge the danni then they are hifalutin. If someone is offhand and they do not chase the catlaina then the catlaina does not see the clarissa. If someone is hifalutin and they do not chase the catlaina then the catlaina conge the danni. If the clarissa observe the zsazsa then the clarissa inunct the catlaina. If someone observe the zsazsa and they do not chase the zsazsa then they need the catlaina. If someone observe the zsazsa and they chase the zsazsa then the zsazsa is corrigible. If someone is hifalutin then they need the zsazsa. If someone is hifalutin and they do not need the zsazsa then they do not see the zsazsa. The zsazsa is corrigible.", "logic": "\nConge(clarissa, zsazsa)\nOffhand(clarissa)\nObserve(clarissa, danni)\nConge(danni, clarissa)\nOffhand(danni)\nInunct(danni, zsazsa)\nInunct(danni, catlaina)\nConge(zsazsa, danni)\nOffhand(zsazsa)\nConge(catlaina, danni)\nConge(catlaina, zsazsa)\nCorrigible(catlaina)\nforall x (Conge(x, danni) -> Hifalutin(x))\nforall x (Offhand(x) and not Conge(x, catlaina) -> not Inunct(catlaina, clarissa))\nforall x (Hifalutin(x) and not Conge(x, catlaina) -> Conge(catlaina, danni))\nObserve(clarissa, zsazsa) -> Inunct(clarissa, catlaina)\nforall x (Observe(x, zsazsa) and not Conge(x, zsazsa) -> Observe(x, catlaina))\nforall x (Observe(x, zsazsa) and Conge(x, zsazsa) -> Corrigible(zsazsa))\nforall x (Hifalutin(x) -> Observe(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Hifalutin(x) and not Observe(x, zsazsa) -> not Inunct(x, zsazsa))\n\nCorrigible(zsazsa)\n\nConge(catlaina, danni) and forall x (Conge(x, danni) -> Hifalutin(x)) -> therefore Hifalutin(catlaina) Hifalutin(catlaina) and forall x (Hifalutin(x) -> Observe(x, zsazsa)) -> therefore Observe(catlaina, zsazsa) Observe(catlaina, zsazsa) and Conge(catlaina, zsazsa) and forall x (Observe(x, zsazsa) and Conge(x, zsazsa) -> Corrigible(zsazsa)) -> therefore Corrigible(zsazsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The vern nettle the winne. The vern is onetime. The vern paralyse the ashely. The ashely nettle the vern. The ashely is onetime. The ashely discommode the winne. The ashely discommode the hernando. The winne nettle the ashely. The winne is onetime. The hernando nettle the ashely. The hernando nettle the winne. The hernando is hobnailed. If someone nettle the ashely then they are barbadian. If someone is onetime and they do not chase the hernando then the hernando does not see the vern. If someone is barbadian and they do not chase the hernando then the hernando nettle the ashely. If the vern paralyse the winne then the vern discommode the hernando. If someone paralyse the winne and they do not chase the winne then they need the hernando. If someone paralyse the winne and they chase the winne then the winne is hobnailed. If someone is barbadian then they need the winne. If someone is barbadian and they do not need the winne then they do not see the winne. The winne is not hobnailed.", "logic": "\nNettle(vern, winne)\nOnetime(vern)\nParalyse(vern, ashely)\nNettle(ashely, vern)\nOnetime(ashely)\nDiscommode(ashely, winne)\nDiscommode(ashely, hernando)\nNettle(winne, ashely)\nOnetime(winne)\nNettle(hernando, ashely)\nNettle(hernando, winne)\nHobnailed(hernando)\nforall x (Nettle(x, ashely) -> Barbadian(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) and not Nettle(x, hernando) -> not Discommode(hernando, vern))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) and not Nettle(x, hernando) -> Nettle(hernando, ashely))\nParalyse(vern, winne) -> Discommode(vern, hernando)\nforall x (Paralyse(x, winne) and not Nettle(x, winne) -> Paralyse(x, hernando))\nforall x (Paralyse(x, winne) and Nettle(x, winne) -> Hobnailed(winne))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) -> Paralyse(x, winne))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) and not Paralyse(x, winne) -> not Discommode(x, winne))\n\nnot Hobnailed(winne)\n\nNettle(hernando, ashely) and forall x (Nettle(x, ashely) -> Barbadian(x)) -> therefore Barbadian(hernando) Barbadian(hernando) and forall x (Barbadian(x) -> Paralyse(x, winne)) -> therefore Paralyse(hernando, winne) Paralyse(hernando, winne) and Nettle(hernando, winne) and forall x (Paralyse(x, winne) and Nettle(x, winne) -> Hobnailed(winne)) -> therefore Hobnailed(winne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The sky ease the averell. The sky is refutable. The sky defecate the juliane. The juliane ease the sky. The juliane is refutable. The juliane berate the averell. The juliane berate the wynn. The averell ease the juliane. The averell is refutable. The wynn ease the juliane. The wynn ease the averell. The wynn is amateur. If someone ease the juliane then they are eudaemonic. If someone is refutable and they do not chase the wynn then the wynn does not see the sky. If someone is eudaemonic and they do not chase the wynn then the wynn ease the juliane. If the sky defecate the averell then the sky berate the wynn. If someone defecate the averell and they do not chase the averell then they need the wynn. If someone defecate the averell and they chase the averell then the averell is amateur. If someone is eudaemonic then they need the averell. If someone is eudaemonic and they do not need the averell then they do not see the averell. The wynn does not need the wynn.", "logic": "\nEase(sky, averell)\nRefutable(sky)\nDefecate(sky, juliane)\nEase(juliane, sky)\nRefutable(juliane)\nBerate(juliane, averell)\nBerate(juliane, wynn)\nEase(averell, juliane)\nRefutable(averell)\nEase(wynn, juliane)\nEase(wynn, averell)\nAmateur(wynn)\nforall x (Ease(x, juliane) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nforall x (Refutable(x) and not Ease(x, wynn) -> not Berate(wynn, sky))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) and not Ease(x, wynn) -> Ease(wynn, juliane))\nDefecate(sky, averell) -> Berate(sky, wynn)\nforall x (Defecate(x, averell) and not Ease(x, averell) -> Defecate(x, wynn))\nforall x (Defecate(x, averell) and Ease(x, averell) -> Amateur(averell))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Defecate(x, averell))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) and not Defecate(x, averell) -> not Berate(x, averell))\n\nnot Defecate(wynn, wynn)\n\nforall x (Defecate(x, averell) and not Ease(x, averell) -> Defecate(x, wynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The zebulon explain the odie. The zebulon is bombastic. The zebulon malt the brewster. The brewster explain the zebulon. The brewster is bombastic. The brewster reply the odie. The brewster reply the barnebas. The odie explain the brewster. The odie is bombastic. The barnebas explain the brewster. The barnebas explain the odie. The barnebas is scaley. If someone explain the brewster then they are combatant. If someone is bombastic and they do not chase the barnebas then the barnebas does not see the zebulon. If someone is combatant and they do not chase the barnebas then the barnebas explain the brewster. If the zebulon malt the odie then the zebulon reply the barnebas. If someone malt the odie and they do not chase the odie then they need the barnebas. If someone malt the odie and they chase the odie then the odie is scaley. If someone is combatant then they need the odie. If someone is combatant and they do not need the odie then they do not see the odie. The brewster malt the odie.", "logic": "\nExplain(zebulon, odie)\nBombastic(zebulon)\nMalt(zebulon, brewster)\nExplain(brewster, zebulon)\nBombastic(brewster)\nReply(brewster, odie)\nReply(brewster, barnebas)\nExplain(odie, brewster)\nBombastic(odie)\nExplain(barnebas, brewster)\nExplain(barnebas, odie)\nScaley(barnebas)\nforall x (Explain(x, brewster) -> Combatant(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and not Explain(x, barnebas) -> not Reply(barnebas, zebulon))\nforall x (Combatant(x) and not Explain(x, barnebas) -> Explain(barnebas, brewster))\nMalt(zebulon, odie) -> Reply(zebulon, barnebas)\nforall x (Malt(x, odie) and not Explain(x, odie) -> Malt(x, barnebas))\nforall x (Malt(x, odie) and Explain(x, odie) -> Scaley(odie))\nforall x (Combatant(x) -> Malt(x, odie))\nforall x (Combatant(x) and not Malt(x, odie) -> not Reply(x, odie))\n\nMalt(brewster, odie)\n\nforall x (Combatant(x) -> Malt(x, odie)) <- forall x (Explain(x, brewster) -> Combatant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The cammi drone the odetta. The cammi is eristical. The cammi shmooze the georg. The georg drone the cammi. The georg is eristical. The georg saint the odetta. The georg saint the irina. The odetta drone the georg. The odetta is eristical. The irina drone the georg. The irina drone the odetta. The irina is defendable. If someone drone the georg then they are entozoan. If someone is eristical and they do not chase the irina then the irina does not see the cammi. If someone is entozoan and they do not chase the irina then the irina drone the georg. If the cammi shmooze the odetta then the cammi saint the irina. If someone shmooze the odetta and they do not chase the odetta then they need the irina. If someone shmooze the odetta and they chase the odetta then the odetta is defendable. If someone is entozoan then they need the odetta. If someone is entozoan and they do not need the odetta then they do not see the odetta. The cammi is not entozoan.", "logic": "\nDrone(cammi, odetta)\nEristical(cammi)\nShmooze(cammi, georg)\nDrone(georg, cammi)\nEristical(georg)\nSaint(georg, odetta)\nSaint(georg, irina)\nDrone(odetta, georg)\nEristical(odetta)\nDrone(irina, georg)\nDrone(irina, odetta)\nDefendable(irina)\nforall x (Drone(x, georg) -> Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Eristical(x) and not Drone(x, irina) -> not Saint(irina, cammi))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) and not Drone(x, irina) -> Drone(irina, georg))\nShmooze(cammi, odetta) -> Saint(cammi, irina)\nforall x (Shmooze(x, odetta) and not Drone(x, odetta) -> Shmooze(x, irina))\nforall x (Shmooze(x, odetta) and Drone(x, odetta) -> Defendable(odetta))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Shmooze(x, odetta))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) and not Shmooze(x, odetta) -> not Saint(x, odetta))\n\nnot Entozoan(cammi)\n\nforall x (Drone(x, georg) -> Entozoan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The nevsa cohabit the raimund. The nevsa is amendable. The nevsa substitute the antonius. The antonius cohabit the nevsa. The antonius is amendable. The antonius straw the raimund. The antonius straw the vernen. The raimund cohabit the antonius. The raimund is amendable. The vernen cohabit the antonius. The vernen cohabit the raimund. The vernen is upright. If someone cohabit the antonius then they are armored. If someone is amendable and they do not chase the vernen then the vernen does not see the nevsa. If someone is armored and they do not chase the vernen then the vernen cohabit the antonius. If the nevsa substitute the raimund then the nevsa straw the vernen. If someone substitute the raimund and they do not chase the raimund then they need the vernen. If someone substitute the raimund and they chase the raimund then the raimund is upright. If someone is armored then they need the raimund. If someone is armored and they do not need the raimund then they do not see the raimund. The raimund substitute the vernen.", "logic": "\nCohabit(nevsa, raimund)\nAmendable(nevsa)\nSubstitute(nevsa, antonius)\nCohabit(antonius, nevsa)\nAmendable(antonius)\nStraw(antonius, raimund)\nStraw(antonius, vernen)\nCohabit(raimund, antonius)\nAmendable(raimund)\nCohabit(vernen, antonius)\nCohabit(vernen, raimund)\nUpright(vernen)\nforall x (Cohabit(x, antonius) -> Armored(x))\nforall x (Amendable(x) and not Cohabit(x, vernen) -> not Straw(vernen, nevsa))\nforall x (Armored(x) and not Cohabit(x, vernen) -> Cohabit(vernen, antonius))\nSubstitute(nevsa, raimund) -> Straw(nevsa, vernen)\nforall x (Substitute(x, raimund) and not Cohabit(x, raimund) -> Substitute(x, vernen))\nforall x (Substitute(x, raimund) and Cohabit(x, raimund) -> Upright(raimund))\nforall x (Armored(x) -> Substitute(x, raimund))\nforall x (Armored(x) and not Substitute(x, raimund) -> not Straw(x, raimund))\n\nSubstitute(raimund, vernen)\n\nforall x (Substitute(x, raimund) and not Cohabit(x, raimund) -> Substitute(x, vernen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The keren adsorb the kermit. The keren is pyogenic. The keren embody the neille. The neille adsorb the keren. The neille is pyogenic. The neille engage the kermit. The neille engage the hedwig. The kermit adsorb the neille. The kermit is pyogenic. The hedwig adsorb the neille. The hedwig adsorb the kermit. The hedwig is sensitized. If someone adsorb the neille then they are nonfissile. If someone is pyogenic and they do not chase the hedwig then the hedwig does not see the keren. If someone is nonfissile and they do not chase the hedwig then the hedwig adsorb the neille. If the keren embody the kermit then the keren engage the hedwig. If someone embody the kermit and they do not chase the kermit then they need the hedwig. If someone embody the kermit and they chase the kermit then the kermit is sensitized. If someone is nonfissile then they need the kermit. If someone is nonfissile and they do not need the kermit then they do not see the kermit. The neille does not need the neille.", "logic": "\nAdsorb(keren, kermit)\nPyogenic(keren)\nEmbody(keren, neille)\nAdsorb(neille, keren)\nPyogenic(neille)\nEngage(neille, kermit)\nEngage(neille, hedwig)\nAdsorb(kermit, neille)\nPyogenic(kermit)\nAdsorb(hedwig, neille)\nAdsorb(hedwig, kermit)\nSensitized(hedwig)\nforall x (Adsorb(x, neille) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and not Adsorb(x, hedwig) -> not Engage(hedwig, keren))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) and not Adsorb(x, hedwig) -> Adsorb(hedwig, neille))\nEmbody(keren, kermit) -> Engage(keren, hedwig)\nforall x (Embody(x, kermit) and not Adsorb(x, kermit) -> Embody(x, hedwig))\nforall x (Embody(x, kermit) and Adsorb(x, kermit) -> Sensitized(kermit))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Embody(x, kermit))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) and not Embody(x, kermit) -> not Engage(x, kermit))\n\nnot Embody(neille, neille)\n\nnot Embody(neille, neille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The felipe ostracize the von. The felipe is draconian. The felipe disaffect the morry. The morry ostracize the felipe. The morry is draconian. The morry rear the von. The morry rear the dyna. The von ostracize the morry. The von is draconian. The dyna ostracize the morry. The dyna ostracize the von. The dyna is moderating. If someone ostracize the morry then they are auriferous. If someone is draconian and they do not chase the dyna then the dyna does not see the felipe. If someone is auriferous and they do not chase the dyna then the dyna ostracize the morry. If the felipe disaffect the von then the felipe rear the dyna. If someone disaffect the von and they do not chase the von then they need the dyna. If someone disaffect the von and they chase the von then the von is moderating. If someone is auriferous then they need the von. If someone is auriferous and they do not need the von then they do not see the von. The dyna ostracize the felipe.", "logic": "\nOstracize(felipe, von)\nDraconian(felipe)\nDisaffect(felipe, morry)\nOstracize(morry, felipe)\nDraconian(morry)\nRear(morry, von)\nRear(morry, dyna)\nOstracize(von, morry)\nDraconian(von)\nOstracize(dyna, morry)\nOstracize(dyna, von)\nModerating(dyna)\nforall x (Ostracize(x, morry) -> Auriferous(x))\nforall x (Draconian(x) and not Ostracize(x, dyna) -> not Rear(dyna, felipe))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) and not Ostracize(x, dyna) -> Ostracize(dyna, morry))\nDisaffect(felipe, von) -> Rear(felipe, dyna)\nforall x (Disaffect(x, von) and not Ostracize(x, von) -> Disaffect(x, dyna))\nforall x (Disaffect(x, von) and Ostracize(x, von) -> Moderating(von))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Disaffect(x, von))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) and not Disaffect(x, von) -> not Rear(x, von))\n\nOstracize(dyna, felipe)\n\nOstracize(dyna, felipe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The kathryne crossruff the jermayne. The kathryne is inviolable. The kathryne goof the wes. The wes crossruff the kathryne. The wes is inviolable. The wes intrench the jermayne. The wes intrench the pam. The jermayne crossruff the wes. The jermayne is inviolable. The pam crossruff the wes. The pam crossruff the jermayne. The pam is nuts. If someone crossruff the wes then they are lashing. If someone is inviolable and they do not chase the pam then the pam does not see the kathryne. If someone is lashing and they do not chase the pam then the pam crossruff the wes. If the kathryne goof the jermayne then the kathryne intrench the pam. If someone goof the jermayne and they do not chase the jermayne then they need the pam. If someone goof the jermayne and they chase the jermayne then the jermayne is nuts. If someone is lashing then they need the jermayne. If someone is lashing and they do not need the jermayne then they do not see the jermayne. The jermayne does not chase the pam.", "logic": "\nCrossruff(kathryne, jermayne)\nInviolable(kathryne)\nGoof(kathryne, wes)\nCrossruff(wes, kathryne)\nInviolable(wes)\nIntrench(wes, jermayne)\nIntrench(wes, pam)\nCrossruff(jermayne, wes)\nInviolable(jermayne)\nCrossruff(pam, wes)\nCrossruff(pam, jermayne)\nNuts(pam)\nforall x (Crossruff(x, wes) -> Lashing(x))\nforall x (Inviolable(x) and not Crossruff(x, pam) -> not Intrench(pam, kathryne))\nforall x (Lashing(x) and not Crossruff(x, pam) -> Crossruff(pam, wes))\nGoof(kathryne, jermayne) -> Intrench(kathryne, pam)\nforall x (Goof(x, jermayne) and not Crossruff(x, jermayne) -> Goof(x, pam))\nforall x (Goof(x, jermayne) and Crossruff(x, jermayne) -> Nuts(jermayne))\nforall x (Lashing(x) -> Goof(x, jermayne))\nforall x (Lashing(x) and not Goof(x, jermayne) -> not Intrench(x, jermayne))\n\nnot Crossruff(jermayne, pam)\n\nnot Crossruff(jermayne, pam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The elysee advert the coleen. The elysee is cognisant. The elysee color the cynthia. The cynthia advert the elysee. The cynthia is cognisant. The cynthia correct the coleen. The cynthia correct the james. The coleen advert the cynthia. The coleen is cognisant. The james advert the cynthia. The james advert the coleen. The james is dysplastic. If someone advert the cynthia then they are stabile. If someone is cognisant and they do not chase the james then the james does not see the elysee. If someone is stabile and they do not chase the james then the james advert the cynthia. If the elysee color the coleen then the elysee correct the james. If someone color the coleen and they do not chase the coleen then they need the james. If someone color the coleen and they chase the coleen then the coleen is dysplastic. If someone is stabile then they need the coleen. If someone is stabile and they do not need the coleen then they do not see the coleen. The james color the cynthia.", "logic": "\nAdvert(elysee, coleen)\nCognisant(elysee)\nColor(elysee, cynthia)\nAdvert(cynthia, elysee)\nCognisant(cynthia)\nCorrect(cynthia, coleen)\nCorrect(cynthia, james)\nAdvert(coleen, cynthia)\nCognisant(coleen)\nAdvert(james, cynthia)\nAdvert(james, coleen)\nDysplastic(james)\nforall x (Advert(x, cynthia) -> Stabile(x))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and not Advert(x, james) -> not Correct(james, elysee))\nforall x (Stabile(x) and not Advert(x, james) -> Advert(james, cynthia))\nColor(elysee, coleen) -> Correct(elysee, james)\nforall x (Color(x, coleen) and not Advert(x, coleen) -> Color(x, james))\nforall x (Color(x, coleen) and Advert(x, coleen) -> Dysplastic(coleen))\nforall x (Stabile(x) -> Color(x, coleen))\nforall x (Stabile(x) and not Color(x, coleen) -> not Correct(x, coleen))\n\nColor(james, cynthia)\n\nColor(james, cynthia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The caria is rapacious. The caria is styptic. The caria metalize the gratia. The gratia diagnose the caria. The gratia is successful. The gratia is adoptive. The matthieu is adoptive. If something diagnose the matthieu and the matthieu diagnose the gratia then the gratia unmake the matthieu. If something is adoptive then it diagnose the gratia. If something unmake the caria and the caria is rapacious then it unmake the matthieu. If something diagnose the caria then it diagnose the matthieu. If something metalize the caria then it unmake the gratia. If something unmake the matthieu then it is rapacious. The caria metalize the gratia.", "logic": "\nRapacious(caria)\nStyptic(caria)\nMetalize(caria, gratia)\nDiagnose(gratia, caria)\nSuccessful(gratia)\nAdoptive(gratia)\nAdoptive(matthieu)\nforall x (Diagnose(x, matthieu) and Diagnose(matthieu, gratia) -> Unmake(gratia, matthieu))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Diagnose(x, gratia))\nforall x (Unmake(x, caria) and Rapacious(caria) -> Unmake(x, matthieu))\nforall x (Diagnose(x, caria) -> Diagnose(x, matthieu))\nforall x (Metalize(x, caria) -> Unmake(x, gratia))\nforall x (Unmake(x, matthieu) -> Rapacious(x))\n\nMetalize(caria, gratia)\n\ntherefore Metalize(caria, gratia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The zahara is zippy. The zahara is untrusty. The zahara abdicate the clotilda. The clotilda sculpture the zahara. The clotilda is unwary. The clotilda is saurian. The roseann is saurian. If something sculpture the roseann and the roseann sculpture the clotilda then the clotilda exuberate the roseann. If something is saurian then it sculpture the clotilda. If something exuberate the zahara and the zahara is zippy then it exuberate the roseann. If something sculpture the zahara then it sculpture the roseann. If something abdicate the zahara then it exuberate the clotilda. If something exuberate the roseann then it is zippy. The zahara is not zippy.", "logic": "\nZippy(zahara)\nUntrusty(zahara)\nAbdicate(zahara, clotilda)\nSculpture(clotilda, zahara)\nUnwary(clotilda)\nSaurian(clotilda)\nSaurian(roseann)\nforall x (Sculpture(x, roseann) and Sculpture(roseann, clotilda) -> Exuberate(clotilda, roseann))\nforall x (Saurian(x) -> Sculpture(x, clotilda))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, zahara) and Zippy(zahara) -> Exuberate(x, roseann))\nforall x (Sculpture(x, zahara) -> Sculpture(x, roseann))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, zahara) -> Exuberate(x, clotilda))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, roseann) -> Zippy(x))\n\nnot Zippy(zahara)\n\ntherefore Zippy(zahara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The melania is stuffed. The melania is stung. The melania pressurise the sisile. The sisile reach the melania. The sisile is fogyish. The sisile is bottommost. The sibley is bottommost. If something reach the sibley and the sibley reach the sisile then the sisile court the sibley. If something is bottommost then it reach the sisile. If something court the melania and the melania is stuffed then it court the sibley. If something reach the melania then it reach the sibley. If something pressurise the melania then it court the sisile. If something court the sibley then it is stuffed. The sisile reach the sisile.", "logic": "\nStuffed(melania)\nStung(melania)\nPressurise(melania, sisile)\nReach(sisile, melania)\nFogyish(sisile)\nBottommost(sisile)\nBottommost(sibley)\nforall x (Reach(x, sibley) and Reach(sibley, sisile) -> Court(sisile, sibley))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Reach(x, sisile))\nforall x (Court(x, melania) and Stuffed(melania) -> Court(x, sibley))\nforall x (Reach(x, melania) -> Reach(x, sibley))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, melania) -> Court(x, sisile))\nforall x (Court(x, sibley) -> Stuffed(x))\n\nReach(sisile, sisile)\n\nBottommost(sisile) and forall x (Bottommost(x) -> Reach(x, sisile)) -> therefore Reach(sisile, sisile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The webb is wailing. The webb is pyrolytic. The webb pauperise the rae. The rae heterodyne the webb. The rae is temptable. The rae is deathlike. The roanne is deathlike. If something heterodyne the roanne and the roanne heterodyne the rae then the rae brand the roanne. If something is deathlike then it heterodyne the rae. If something brand the webb and the webb is wailing then it brand the roanne. If something heterodyne the webb then it heterodyne the roanne. If something pauperise the webb then it brand the rae. If something brand the roanne then it is wailing. The rae does not eat the rae.", "logic": "\nWailing(webb)\nPyrolytic(webb)\nPauperise(webb, rae)\nHeterodyne(rae, webb)\nTemptable(rae)\nDeathlike(rae)\nDeathlike(roanne)\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, roanne) and Heterodyne(roanne, rae) -> Brand(rae, roanne))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Heterodyne(x, rae))\nforall x (Brand(x, webb) and Wailing(webb) -> Brand(x, roanne))\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, webb) -> Heterodyne(x, roanne))\nforall x (Pauperise(x, webb) -> Brand(x, rae))\nforall x (Brand(x, roanne) -> Wailing(x))\n\nnot Heterodyne(rae, rae)\n\nDeathlike(rae) and forall x (Deathlike(x) -> Heterodyne(x, rae)) -> therefore Heterodyne(rae, rae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The charmaine is lobar. The charmaine is acuate. The charmaine pall the roosevelt. The roosevelt unlace the charmaine. The roosevelt is bordered. The roosevelt is opulent. The hellene is opulent. If something unlace the hellene and the hellene unlace the roosevelt then the roosevelt skip the hellene. If something is opulent then it unlace the roosevelt. If something skip the charmaine and the charmaine is lobar then it skip the hellene. If something unlace the charmaine then it unlace the hellene. If something pall the charmaine then it skip the roosevelt. If something skip the hellene then it is lobar. The roosevelt skip the hellene.", "logic": "\nLobar(charmaine)\nAcuate(charmaine)\nPall(charmaine, roosevelt)\nUnlace(roosevelt, charmaine)\nBordered(roosevelt)\nOpulent(roosevelt)\nOpulent(hellene)\nforall x (Unlace(x, hellene) and Unlace(hellene, roosevelt) -> Skip(roosevelt, hellene))\nforall x (Opulent(x) -> Unlace(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Skip(x, charmaine) and Lobar(charmaine) -> Skip(x, hellene))\nforall x (Unlace(x, charmaine) -> Unlace(x, hellene))\nforall x (Pall(x, charmaine) -> Skip(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Skip(x, hellene) -> Lobar(x))\n\nSkip(roosevelt, hellene)\n\nUnlace(roosevelt, charmaine) and forall x (Unlace(x, charmaine) -> Unlace(x, hellene)) -> therefore Unlace(roosevelt, hellene) Opulent(hellene) and forall x (Opulent(x) -> Unlace(x, roosevelt)) -> therefore Unlace(hellene, roosevelt) Unlace(roosevelt, hellene) and Unlace(hellene, roosevelt) and forall x (Unlace(x, hellene) and Unlace(hellene, roosevelt) -> Skip(roosevelt, hellene)) -> therefore Skip(roosevelt, hellene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The juan is shelled. The juan is pyogenic. The juan slouch the seana. The seana pettifog the juan. The seana is undeceived. The seana is hasidic. The leonore is hasidic. If something pettifog the leonore and the leonore pettifog the seana then the seana obsess the leonore. If something is hasidic then it pettifog the seana. If something obsess the juan and the juan is shelled then it obsess the leonore. If something pettifog the juan then it pettifog the leonore. If something slouch the juan then it obsess the seana. If something obsess the leonore then it is shelled. The seana does not need the leonore.", "logic": "\nShelled(juan)\nPyogenic(juan)\nSlouch(juan, seana)\nPettifog(seana, juan)\nUndeceived(seana)\nHasidic(seana)\nHasidic(leonore)\nforall x (Pettifog(x, leonore) and Pettifog(leonore, seana) -> Obsess(seana, leonore))\nforall x (Hasidic(x) -> Pettifog(x, seana))\nforall x (Obsess(x, juan) and Shelled(juan) -> Obsess(x, leonore))\nforall x (Pettifog(x, juan) -> Pettifog(x, leonore))\nforall x (Slouch(x, juan) -> Obsess(x, seana))\nforall x (Obsess(x, leonore) -> Shelled(x))\n\nnot Obsess(seana, leonore)\n\nPettifog(seana, juan) and forall x (Pettifog(x, juan) -> Pettifog(x, leonore)) -> therefore Pettifog(seana, leonore) Hasidic(leonore) and forall x (Hasidic(x) -> Pettifog(x, seana)) -> therefore Pettifog(leonore, seana) Pettifog(seana, leonore) and Pettifog(leonore, seana) and forall x (Pettifog(x, leonore) and Pettifog(leonore, seana) -> Obsess(seana, leonore)) -> therefore Obsess(seana, leonore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The hendrik is divided. The hendrik is precative. The hendrik minify the adel. The adel refloat the hendrik. The adel is coalescent. The adel is millionth. The grete is millionth. If something refloat the grete and the grete refloat the adel then the adel unyoke the grete. If something is millionth then it refloat the adel. If something unyoke the hendrik and the hendrik is divided then it unyoke the grete. If something refloat the hendrik then it refloat the grete. If something minify the hendrik then it unyoke the adel. If something unyoke the grete then it is divided. The adel is divided.", "logic": "\nDivided(hendrik)\nPrecative(hendrik)\nMinify(hendrik, adel)\nRefloat(adel, hendrik)\nCoalescent(adel)\nMillionth(adel)\nMillionth(grete)\nforall x (Refloat(x, grete) and Refloat(grete, adel) -> Unyoke(adel, grete))\nforall x (Millionth(x) -> Refloat(x, adel))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, hendrik) and Divided(hendrik) -> Unyoke(x, grete))\nforall x (Refloat(x, hendrik) -> Refloat(x, grete))\nforall x (Minify(x, hendrik) -> Unyoke(x, adel))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, grete) -> Divided(x))\n\nDivided(adel)\n\nRefloat(adel, hendrik) and forall x (Refloat(x, hendrik) -> Refloat(x, grete)) -> therefore Refloat(adel, grete) Millionth(grete) and forall x (Millionth(x) -> Refloat(x, adel)) -> therefore Refloat(grete, adel) Refloat(adel, grete) and Refloat(grete, adel) and forall x (Refloat(x, grete) and Refloat(grete, adel) -> Unyoke(adel, grete)) -> therefore Unyoke(adel, grete) Unyoke(adel, grete) and forall x (Unyoke(x, grete) -> Divided(x)) -> therefore Divided(adel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The wadsworth is secular. The wadsworth is bantu. The wadsworth veneer the carola. The carola volunteer the wadsworth. The carola is unrested. The carola is sunbaked. The cathee is sunbaked. If something volunteer the cathee and the cathee volunteer the carola then the carola reave the cathee. If something is sunbaked then it volunteer the carola. If something reave the wadsworth and the wadsworth is secular then it reave the cathee. If something volunteer the wadsworth then it volunteer the cathee. If something veneer the wadsworth then it reave the carola. If something reave the cathee then it is secular. The carola is not secular.", "logic": "\nSecular(wadsworth)\nBantu(wadsworth)\nVeneer(wadsworth, carola)\nVolunteer(carola, wadsworth)\nUnrested(carola)\nSunbaked(carola)\nSunbaked(cathee)\nforall x (Volunteer(x, cathee) and Volunteer(cathee, carola) -> Reave(carola, cathee))\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Volunteer(x, carola))\nforall x (Reave(x, wadsworth) and Secular(wadsworth) -> Reave(x, cathee))\nforall x (Volunteer(x, wadsworth) -> Volunteer(x, cathee))\nforall x (Veneer(x, wadsworth) -> Reave(x, carola))\nforall x (Reave(x, cathee) -> Secular(x))\n\nnot Secular(carola)\n\nVolunteer(carola, wadsworth) and forall x (Volunteer(x, wadsworth) -> Volunteer(x, cathee)) -> therefore Volunteer(carola, cathee) Sunbaked(cathee) and forall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Volunteer(x, carola)) -> therefore Volunteer(cathee, carola) Volunteer(carola, cathee) and Volunteer(cathee, carola) and forall x (Volunteer(x, cathee) and Volunteer(cathee, carola) -> Reave(carola, cathee)) -> therefore Reave(carola, cathee) Reave(carola, cathee) and forall x (Reave(x, cathee) -> Secular(x)) -> therefore Secular(carola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The ardis is financial. The ardis is guiltless. The ardis reprove the philomena. The philomena tout the ardis. The philomena is omnipotent. The philomena is mordacious. The zia is mordacious. If something tout the zia and the zia tout the philomena then the philomena procreate the zia. If something is mordacious then it tout the philomena. If something procreate the ardis and the ardis is financial then it procreate the zia. If something tout the ardis then it tout the zia. If something reprove the ardis then it procreate the philomena. If something procreate the zia then it is financial. The ardis does not eat the zia.", "logic": "\nFinancial(ardis)\nGuiltless(ardis)\nReprove(ardis, philomena)\nTout(philomena, ardis)\nOmnipotent(philomena)\nMordacious(philomena)\nMordacious(zia)\nforall x (Tout(x, zia) and Tout(zia, philomena) -> Procreate(philomena, zia))\nforall x (Mordacious(x) -> Tout(x, philomena))\nforall x (Procreate(x, ardis) and Financial(ardis) -> Procreate(x, zia))\nforall x (Tout(x, ardis) -> Tout(x, zia))\nforall x (Reprove(x, ardis) -> Procreate(x, philomena))\nforall x (Procreate(x, zia) -> Financial(x))\n\nnot Tout(ardis, zia)\n\nforall x (Tout(x, ardis) -> Tout(x, zia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The geoffry is nonsexual. The geoffry is knockout. The geoffry theorise the grethel. The grethel denature the geoffry. The grethel is mephitic. The grethel is catchy. The fulton is catchy. If something denature the fulton and the fulton denature the grethel then the grethel deaminize the fulton. If something is catchy then it denature the grethel. If something deaminize the geoffry and the geoffry is nonsexual then it deaminize the fulton. If something denature the geoffry then it denature the fulton. If something theorise the geoffry then it deaminize the grethel. If something deaminize the fulton then it is nonsexual. The geoffry deaminize the grethel.", "logic": "\nNonsexual(geoffry)\nKnockout(geoffry)\nTheorise(geoffry, grethel)\nDenature(grethel, geoffry)\nMephitic(grethel)\nCatchy(grethel)\nCatchy(fulton)\nforall x (Denature(x, fulton) and Denature(fulton, grethel) -> Deaminize(grethel, fulton))\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Denature(x, grethel))\nforall x (Deaminize(x, geoffry) and Nonsexual(geoffry) -> Deaminize(x, fulton))\nforall x (Denature(x, geoffry) -> Denature(x, fulton))\nforall x (Theorise(x, geoffry) -> Deaminize(x, grethel))\nforall x (Deaminize(x, fulton) -> Nonsexual(x))\n\nDeaminize(geoffry, grethel)\n\nforall x (Theorise(x, geoffry) -> Deaminize(x, grethel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The gideon is perdurable. The gideon is quick. The gideon approve the flipper. The flipper metricate the gideon. The flipper is drugless. The flipper is unifoliate. The sheryl is unifoliate. If something metricate the sheryl and the sheryl metricate the flipper then the flipper boost the sheryl. If something is unifoliate then it metricate the flipper. If something boost the gideon and the gideon is perdurable then it boost the sheryl. If something metricate the gideon then it metricate the sheryl. If something approve the gideon then it boost the flipper. If something boost the sheryl then it is perdurable. The flipper does not need the flipper.", "logic": "\nPerdurable(gideon)\nQuick(gideon)\nApprove(gideon, flipper)\nMetricate(flipper, gideon)\nDrugless(flipper)\nUnifoliate(flipper)\nUnifoliate(sheryl)\nforall x (Metricate(x, sheryl) and Metricate(sheryl, flipper) -> Boost(flipper, sheryl))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Metricate(x, flipper))\nforall x (Boost(x, gideon) and Perdurable(gideon) -> Boost(x, sheryl))\nforall x (Metricate(x, gideon) -> Metricate(x, sheryl))\nforall x (Approve(x, gideon) -> Boost(x, flipper))\nforall x (Boost(x, sheryl) -> Perdurable(x))\n\nnot Boost(flipper, flipper)\n\nforall x (Approve(x, gideon) -> Boost(x, flipper)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The iolande is striate. The iolande is unplayful. The iolande cicatrise the cyrus. The cyrus bind the iolande. The cyrus is straggling. The cyrus is shrinkable. The ilka is shrinkable. If something bind the ilka and the ilka bind the cyrus then the cyrus pardon the ilka. If something is shrinkable then it bind the cyrus. If something pardon the iolande and the iolande is striate then it pardon the ilka. If something bind the iolande then it bind the ilka. If something cicatrise the iolande then it pardon the cyrus. If something pardon the ilka then it is striate. The ilka is striate.", "logic": "\nStriate(iolande)\nUnplayful(iolande)\nCicatrise(iolande, cyrus)\nBind(cyrus, iolande)\nStraggling(cyrus)\nShrinkable(cyrus)\nShrinkable(ilka)\nforall x (Bind(x, ilka) and Bind(ilka, cyrus) -> Pardon(cyrus, ilka))\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) -> Bind(x, cyrus))\nforall x (Pardon(x, iolande) and Striate(iolande) -> Pardon(x, ilka))\nforall x (Bind(x, iolande) -> Bind(x, ilka))\nforall x (Cicatrise(x, iolande) -> Pardon(x, cyrus))\nforall x (Pardon(x, ilka) -> Striate(x))\n\nStriate(ilka)\n\nforall x (Pardon(x, ilka) -> Striate(x)) <- forall x (Pardon(x, iolande) and Striate(iolande) -> Pardon(x, ilka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The chrissie is exalted. The chrissie is speakable. The chrissie befog the carine. The carine cloister the chrissie. The carine is unblessed. The carine is fanlike. The guglielma is fanlike. If something cloister the guglielma and the guglielma cloister the carine then the carine regrow the guglielma. If something is fanlike then it cloister the carine. If something regrow the chrissie and the chrissie is exalted then it regrow the guglielma. If something cloister the chrissie then it cloister the guglielma. If something befog the chrissie then it regrow the carine. If something regrow the guglielma then it is exalted. The guglielma does not see the chrissie.", "logic": "\nExalted(chrissie)\nSpeakable(chrissie)\nBefog(chrissie, carine)\nCloister(carine, chrissie)\nUnblessed(carine)\nFanlike(carine)\nFanlike(guglielma)\nforall x (Cloister(x, guglielma) and Cloister(guglielma, carine) -> Regrow(carine, guglielma))\nforall x (Fanlike(x) -> Cloister(x, carine))\nforall x (Regrow(x, chrissie) and Exalted(chrissie) -> Regrow(x, guglielma))\nforall x (Cloister(x, chrissie) -> Cloister(x, guglielma))\nforall x (Befog(x, chrissie) -> Regrow(x, carine))\nforall x (Regrow(x, guglielma) -> Exalted(x))\n\nnot Befog(guglielma, chrissie)\n\nnot Befog(guglielma, chrissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The joanie is brindle. The joanie is vendible. The joanie outsail the hollis. The hollis remediate the joanie. The hollis is stunned. The hollis is sotho. The hermann is sotho. If something remediate the hermann and the hermann remediate the hollis then the hollis whang the hermann. If something is sotho then it remediate the hollis. If something whang the joanie and the joanie is brindle then it whang the hermann. If something remediate the joanie then it remediate the hermann. If something outsail the joanie then it whang the hollis. If something whang the hermann then it is brindle. The joanie is stunned.", "logic": "\nBrindle(joanie)\nVendible(joanie)\nOutsail(joanie, hollis)\nRemediate(hollis, joanie)\nStunned(hollis)\nSotho(hollis)\nSotho(hermann)\nforall x (Remediate(x, hermann) and Remediate(hermann, hollis) -> Whang(hollis, hermann))\nforall x (Sotho(x) -> Remediate(x, hollis))\nforall x (Whang(x, joanie) and Brindle(joanie) -> Whang(x, hermann))\nforall x (Remediate(x, joanie) -> Remediate(x, hermann))\nforall x (Outsail(x, joanie) -> Whang(x, hollis))\nforall x (Whang(x, hermann) -> Brindle(x))\n\nStunned(joanie)\n\nStunned(joanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The russell is reflective. The russell is cationic. The russell cocoon the ameline. The ameline basset the russell. The ameline is iambic. The ameline is smothered. The francine is smothered. If something basset the francine and the francine basset the ameline then the ameline deem the francine. If something is smothered then it basset the ameline. If something deem the russell and the russell is reflective then it deem the francine. If something basset the russell then it basset the francine. If something cocoon the russell then it deem the ameline. If something deem the francine then it is reflective. The russell is not cold.", "logic": "\nReflective(russell)\nCationic(russell)\nCocoon(russell, ameline)\nBasset(ameline, russell)\nIambic(ameline)\nSmothered(ameline)\nSmothered(francine)\nforall x (Basset(x, francine) and Basset(francine, ameline) -> Deem(ameline, francine))\nforall x (Smothered(x) -> Basset(x, ameline))\nforall x (Deem(x, russell) and Reflective(russell) -> Deem(x, francine))\nforall x (Basset(x, russell) -> Basset(x, francine))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, russell) -> Deem(x, ameline))\nforall x (Deem(x, francine) -> Reflective(x))\n\nnot Cold(russell)\n\nnot Cold(russell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The zacharia is lucrative. The zacharia is humourless. The zacharia hound the kathlin. The kathlin jazz the zacharia. The kathlin is whispering. The kathlin is busybodied. The milo is busybodied. If something jazz the milo and the milo jazz the kathlin then the kathlin germinate the milo. If something is busybodied then it jazz the kathlin. If something germinate the zacharia and the zacharia is lucrative then it germinate the milo. If something jazz the zacharia then it jazz the milo. If something hound the zacharia then it germinate the kathlin. If something germinate the milo then it is lucrative. The kathlin hound the kathlin.", "logic": "\nLucrative(zacharia)\nHumourless(zacharia)\nHound(zacharia, kathlin)\nJazz(kathlin, zacharia)\nWhispering(kathlin)\nBusybodied(kathlin)\nBusybodied(milo)\nforall x (Jazz(x, milo) and Jazz(milo, kathlin) -> Germinate(kathlin, milo))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) -> Jazz(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Germinate(x, zacharia) and Lucrative(zacharia) -> Germinate(x, milo))\nforall x (Jazz(x, zacharia) -> Jazz(x, milo))\nforall x (Hound(x, zacharia) -> Germinate(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Germinate(x, milo) -> Lucrative(x))\n\nHound(kathlin, kathlin)\n\nHound(kathlin, kathlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The sophie namedrop the patricia. The sophie namedrop the nedda. The sophie is nude. The sophie adjourn the patricia. The sophie police the patricia. The patricia is votive. The patricia is validated. The patricia adjourn the sophie. The patricia police the sophie. The patricia police the nedda. The nedda namedrop the sophie. The nedda is votive. The nedda is validated. The nedda is nude. The nedda adjourn the sophie. If someone police the patricia then they eat the sophie. If someone is validated and they see the patricia then they eat the nedda. If someone adjourn the patricia and the patricia namedrop the sophie then the patricia adjourn the nedda. If someone adjourn the sophie and the sophie is validated then the sophie police the nedda. If someone namedrop the sophie then they need the sophie. If someone police the patricia and they need the sophie then they see the nedda. The patricia police the sophie.", "logic": "\nNamedrop(sophie, patricia)\nNamedrop(sophie, nedda)\nNude(sophie)\nAdjourn(sophie, patricia)\nPolice(sophie, patricia)\nVotive(patricia)\nValidated(patricia)\nAdjourn(patricia, sophie)\nPolice(patricia, sophie)\nPolice(patricia, nedda)\nNamedrop(nedda, sophie)\nVotive(nedda)\nValidated(nedda)\nNude(nedda)\nAdjourn(nedda, sophie)\nforall x (Police(x, patricia) -> Namedrop(x, sophie))\nforall x (Validated(x) and Police(x, patricia) -> Namedrop(x, nedda))\nforall x (Adjourn(x, patricia) and Namedrop(patricia, sophie) -> Adjourn(patricia, nedda))\nforall x (Adjourn(x, sophie) and Validated(sophie) -> Police(sophie, nedda))\nforall x (Namedrop(x, sophie) -> Adjourn(x, sophie))\nforall x (Police(x, patricia) and Adjourn(x, sophie) -> Police(x, nedda))\n\nPolice(patricia, sophie)\n\ntherefore Police(patricia, sophie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The gamaliel beware the merrie. The gamaliel beware the kaitlynn. The gamaliel is navicular. The gamaliel purl the merrie. The gamaliel dissociate the merrie. The merrie is wild. The merrie is raped. The merrie purl the gamaliel. The merrie dissociate the gamaliel. The merrie dissociate the kaitlynn. The kaitlynn beware the gamaliel. The kaitlynn is wild. The kaitlynn is raped. The kaitlynn is navicular. The kaitlynn purl the gamaliel. If someone dissociate the merrie then they eat the gamaliel. If someone is raped and they see the merrie then they eat the kaitlynn. If someone purl the merrie and the merrie beware the gamaliel then the merrie purl the kaitlynn. If someone purl the gamaliel and the gamaliel is raped then the gamaliel dissociate the kaitlynn. If someone beware the gamaliel then they need the gamaliel. If someone dissociate the merrie and they need the gamaliel then they see the kaitlynn. The gamaliel does not eat the kaitlynn.", "logic": "\nBeware(gamaliel, merrie)\nBeware(gamaliel, kaitlynn)\nNavicular(gamaliel)\nPurl(gamaliel, merrie)\nDissociate(gamaliel, merrie)\nWild(merrie)\nRaped(merrie)\nPurl(merrie, gamaliel)\nDissociate(merrie, gamaliel)\nDissociate(merrie, kaitlynn)\nBeware(kaitlynn, gamaliel)\nWild(kaitlynn)\nRaped(kaitlynn)\nNavicular(kaitlynn)\nPurl(kaitlynn, gamaliel)\nforall x (Dissociate(x, merrie) -> Beware(x, gamaliel))\nforall x (Raped(x) and Dissociate(x, merrie) -> Beware(x, kaitlynn))\nforall x (Purl(x, merrie) and Beware(merrie, gamaliel) -> Purl(merrie, kaitlynn))\nforall x (Purl(x, gamaliel) and Raped(gamaliel) -> Dissociate(gamaliel, kaitlynn))\nforall x (Beware(x, gamaliel) -> Purl(x, gamaliel))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, merrie) and Purl(x, gamaliel) -> Dissociate(x, kaitlynn))\n\nnot Beware(gamaliel, kaitlynn)\n\ntherefore Beware(gamaliel, kaitlynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The vinita confute the gennifer. The vinita confute the cristine. The vinita is platyrhine. The vinita whirl the gennifer. The vinita dehorn the gennifer. The gennifer is myelinic. The gennifer is hardbound. The gennifer whirl the vinita. The gennifer dehorn the vinita. The gennifer dehorn the cristine. The cristine confute the vinita. The cristine is myelinic. The cristine is hardbound. The cristine is platyrhine. The cristine whirl the vinita. If someone dehorn the gennifer then they eat the vinita. If someone is hardbound and they see the gennifer then they eat the cristine. If someone whirl the gennifer and the gennifer confute the vinita then the gennifer whirl the cristine. If someone whirl the vinita and the vinita is hardbound then the vinita dehorn the cristine. If someone confute the vinita then they need the vinita. If someone dehorn the gennifer and they need the vinita then they see the cristine. The vinita confute the vinita.", "logic": "\nConfute(vinita, gennifer)\nConfute(vinita, cristine)\nPlatyrhine(vinita)\nWhirl(vinita, gennifer)\nDehorn(vinita, gennifer)\nMyelinic(gennifer)\nHardbound(gennifer)\nWhirl(gennifer, vinita)\nDehorn(gennifer, vinita)\nDehorn(gennifer, cristine)\nConfute(cristine, vinita)\nMyelinic(cristine)\nHardbound(cristine)\nPlatyrhine(cristine)\nWhirl(cristine, vinita)\nforall x (Dehorn(x, gennifer) -> Confute(x, vinita))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) and Dehorn(x, gennifer) -> Confute(x, cristine))\nforall x (Whirl(x, gennifer) and Confute(gennifer, vinita) -> Whirl(gennifer, cristine))\nforall x (Whirl(x, vinita) and Hardbound(vinita) -> Dehorn(vinita, cristine))\nforall x (Confute(x, vinita) -> Whirl(x, vinita))\nforall x (Dehorn(x, gennifer) and Whirl(x, vinita) -> Dehorn(x, cristine))\n\nConfute(vinita, vinita)\n\nDehorn(vinita, gennifer) and forall x (Dehorn(x, gennifer) -> Confute(x, vinita)) -> therefore Confute(vinita, vinita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The arly straighten the christ. The arly straighten the brita. The arly is sportive. The arly blether the christ. The arly humour the christ. The christ is singsong. The christ is ibsenian. The christ blether the arly. The christ humour the arly. The christ humour the brita. The brita straighten the arly. The brita is singsong. The brita is ibsenian. The brita is sportive. The brita blether the arly. If someone humour the christ then they eat the arly. If someone is ibsenian and they see the christ then they eat the brita. If someone blether the christ and the christ straighten the arly then the christ blether the brita. If someone blether the arly and the arly is ibsenian then the arly humour the brita. If someone straighten the arly then they need the arly. If someone humour the christ and they need the arly then they see the brita. The arly does not eat the arly.", "logic": "\nStraighten(arly, christ)\nStraighten(arly, brita)\nSportive(arly)\nBlether(arly, christ)\nHumour(arly, christ)\nSingsong(christ)\nIbsenian(christ)\nBlether(christ, arly)\nHumour(christ, arly)\nHumour(christ, brita)\nStraighten(brita, arly)\nSingsong(brita)\nIbsenian(brita)\nSportive(brita)\nBlether(brita, arly)\nforall x (Humour(x, christ) -> Straighten(x, arly))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) and Humour(x, christ) -> Straighten(x, brita))\nforall x (Blether(x, christ) and Straighten(christ, arly) -> Blether(christ, brita))\nforall x (Blether(x, arly) and Ibsenian(arly) -> Humour(arly, brita))\nforall x (Straighten(x, arly) -> Blether(x, arly))\nforall x (Humour(x, christ) and Blether(x, arly) -> Humour(x, brita))\n\nnot Straighten(arly, arly)\n\nHumour(arly, christ) and forall x (Humour(x, christ) -> Straighten(x, arly)) -> therefore Straighten(arly, arly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The felicle detoxicate the dorothea. The felicle detoxicate the wash. The felicle is governing. The felicle petition the dorothea. The felicle vivisect the dorothea. The dorothea is jolty. The dorothea is lightsome. The dorothea petition the felicle. The dorothea vivisect the felicle. The dorothea vivisect the wash. The wash detoxicate the felicle. The wash is jolty. The wash is lightsome. The wash is governing. The wash petition the felicle. If someone vivisect the dorothea then they eat the felicle. If someone is lightsome and they see the dorothea then they eat the wash. If someone petition the dorothea and the dorothea detoxicate the felicle then the dorothea petition the wash. If someone petition the felicle and the felicle is lightsome then the felicle vivisect the wash. If someone detoxicate the felicle then they need the felicle. If someone vivisect the dorothea and they need the felicle then they see the wash. The felicle petition the felicle.", "logic": "\nDetoxicate(felicle, dorothea)\nDetoxicate(felicle, wash)\nGoverning(felicle)\nPetition(felicle, dorothea)\nVivisect(felicle, dorothea)\nJolty(dorothea)\nLightsome(dorothea)\nPetition(dorothea, felicle)\nVivisect(dorothea, felicle)\nVivisect(dorothea, wash)\nDetoxicate(wash, felicle)\nJolty(wash)\nLightsome(wash)\nGoverning(wash)\nPetition(wash, felicle)\nforall x (Vivisect(x, dorothea) -> Detoxicate(x, felicle))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) and Vivisect(x, dorothea) -> Detoxicate(x, wash))\nforall x (Petition(x, dorothea) and Detoxicate(dorothea, felicle) -> Petition(dorothea, wash))\nforall x (Petition(x, felicle) and Lightsome(felicle) -> Vivisect(felicle, wash))\nforall x (Detoxicate(x, felicle) -> Petition(x, felicle))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, dorothea) and Petition(x, felicle) -> Vivisect(x, wash))\n\nPetition(felicle, felicle)\n\nVivisect(felicle, dorothea) and forall x (Vivisect(x, dorothea) -> Detoxicate(x, felicle)) -> therefore Detoxicate(felicle, felicle) Detoxicate(felicle, felicle) and forall x (Detoxicate(x, felicle) -> Petition(x, felicle)) -> therefore Petition(felicle, felicle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The willard mull the ebeneser. The willard mull the kikelia. The willard is undefeated. The willard incense the ebeneser. The willard stultify the ebeneser. The ebeneser is sedative. The ebeneser is acute. The ebeneser incense the willard. The ebeneser stultify the willard. The ebeneser stultify the kikelia. The kikelia mull the willard. The kikelia is sedative. The kikelia is acute. The kikelia is undefeated. The kikelia incense the willard. If someone stultify the ebeneser then they eat the willard. If someone is acute and they see the ebeneser then they eat the kikelia. If someone incense the ebeneser and the ebeneser mull the willard then the ebeneser incense the kikelia. If someone incense the willard and the willard is acute then the willard stultify the kikelia. If someone mull the willard then they need the willard. If someone stultify the ebeneser and they need the willard then they see the kikelia. The willard does not need the willard.", "logic": "\nMull(willard, ebeneser)\nMull(willard, kikelia)\nUndefeated(willard)\nIncense(willard, ebeneser)\nStultify(willard, ebeneser)\nSedative(ebeneser)\nAcute(ebeneser)\nIncense(ebeneser, willard)\nStultify(ebeneser, willard)\nStultify(ebeneser, kikelia)\nMull(kikelia, willard)\nSedative(kikelia)\nAcute(kikelia)\nUndefeated(kikelia)\nIncense(kikelia, willard)\nforall x (Stultify(x, ebeneser) -> Mull(x, willard))\nforall x (Acute(x) and Stultify(x, ebeneser) -> Mull(x, kikelia))\nforall x (Incense(x, ebeneser) and Mull(ebeneser, willard) -> Incense(ebeneser, kikelia))\nforall x (Incense(x, willard) and Acute(willard) -> Stultify(willard, kikelia))\nforall x (Mull(x, willard) -> Incense(x, willard))\nforall x (Stultify(x, ebeneser) and Incense(x, willard) -> Stultify(x, kikelia))\n\nnot Incense(willard, willard)\n\nStultify(willard, ebeneser) and forall x (Stultify(x, ebeneser) -> Mull(x, willard)) -> therefore Mull(willard, willard) Mull(willard, willard) and forall x (Mull(x, willard) -> Incense(x, willard)) -> therefore Incense(willard, willard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The garey faze the therese. The garey faze the bryan. The garey is tenfold. The garey remold the therese. The garey choir the therese. The therese is decided. The therese is mythologic. The therese remold the garey. The therese choir the garey. The therese choir the bryan. The bryan faze the garey. The bryan is decided. The bryan is mythologic. The bryan is tenfold. The bryan remold the garey. If someone choir the therese then they eat the garey. If someone is mythologic and they see the therese then they eat the bryan. If someone remold the therese and the therese faze the garey then the therese remold the bryan. If someone remold the garey and the garey is mythologic then the garey choir the bryan. If someone faze the garey then they need the garey. If someone choir the therese and they need the garey then they see the bryan. The garey choir the bryan.", "logic": "\nFaze(garey, therese)\nFaze(garey, bryan)\nTenfold(garey)\nRemold(garey, therese)\nChoir(garey, therese)\nDecided(therese)\nMythologic(therese)\nRemold(therese, garey)\nChoir(therese, garey)\nChoir(therese, bryan)\nFaze(bryan, garey)\nDecided(bryan)\nMythologic(bryan)\nTenfold(bryan)\nRemold(bryan, garey)\nforall x (Choir(x, therese) -> Faze(x, garey))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Choir(x, therese) -> Faze(x, bryan))\nforall x (Remold(x, therese) and Faze(therese, garey) -> Remold(therese, bryan))\nforall x (Remold(x, garey) and Mythologic(garey) -> Choir(garey, bryan))\nforall x (Faze(x, garey) -> Remold(x, garey))\nforall x (Choir(x, therese) and Remold(x, garey) -> Choir(x, bryan))\n\nChoir(garey, bryan)\n\nChoir(garey, therese) and forall x (Choir(x, therese) -> Faze(x, garey)) -> therefore Faze(garey, garey) Faze(garey, garey) and forall x (Faze(x, garey) -> Remold(x, garey)) -> therefore Remold(garey, garey) Choir(garey, therese) and Remold(garey, garey) and forall x (Choir(x, therese) and Remold(x, garey) -> Choir(x, bryan)) -> therefore Choir(garey, bryan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The winnie tempt the jaquelyn. The winnie tempt the fran. The winnie is ritzy. The winnie croon the jaquelyn. The winnie discipline the jaquelyn. The jaquelyn is enough. The jaquelyn is bloody. The jaquelyn croon the winnie. The jaquelyn discipline the winnie. The jaquelyn discipline the fran. The fran tempt the winnie. The fran is enough. The fran is bloody. The fran is ritzy. The fran croon the winnie. If someone discipline the jaquelyn then they eat the winnie. If someone is bloody and they see the jaquelyn then they eat the fran. If someone croon the jaquelyn and the jaquelyn tempt the winnie then the jaquelyn croon the fran. If someone croon the winnie and the winnie is bloody then the winnie discipline the fran. If someone tempt the winnie then they need the winnie. If someone discipline the jaquelyn and they need the winnie then they see the fran. The winnie does not see the fran.", "logic": "\nTempt(winnie, jaquelyn)\nTempt(winnie, fran)\nRitzy(winnie)\nCroon(winnie, jaquelyn)\nDiscipline(winnie, jaquelyn)\nEnough(jaquelyn)\nBloody(jaquelyn)\nCroon(jaquelyn, winnie)\nDiscipline(jaquelyn, winnie)\nDiscipline(jaquelyn, fran)\nTempt(fran, winnie)\nEnough(fran)\nBloody(fran)\nRitzy(fran)\nCroon(fran, winnie)\nforall x (Discipline(x, jaquelyn) -> Tempt(x, winnie))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and Discipline(x, jaquelyn) -> Tempt(x, fran))\nforall x (Croon(x, jaquelyn) and Tempt(jaquelyn, winnie) -> Croon(jaquelyn, fran))\nforall x (Croon(x, winnie) and Bloody(winnie) -> Discipline(winnie, fran))\nforall x (Tempt(x, winnie) -> Croon(x, winnie))\nforall x (Discipline(x, jaquelyn) and Croon(x, winnie) -> Discipline(x, fran))\n\nnot Discipline(winnie, fran)\n\nDiscipline(winnie, jaquelyn) and forall x (Discipline(x, jaquelyn) -> Tempt(x, winnie)) -> therefore Tempt(winnie, winnie) Tempt(winnie, winnie) and forall x (Tempt(x, winnie) -> Croon(x, winnie)) -> therefore Croon(winnie, winnie) Discipline(winnie, jaquelyn) and Croon(winnie, winnie) and forall x (Discipline(x, jaquelyn) and Croon(x, winnie) -> Discipline(x, fran)) -> therefore Discipline(winnie, fran)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The deina meld the lucienne. The deina meld the menard. The deina is invaluable. The deina mosey the lucienne. The deina initialise the lucienne. The lucienne is ferine. The lucienne is holy. The lucienne mosey the deina. The lucienne initialise the deina. The lucienne initialise the menard. The menard meld the deina. The menard is ferine. The menard is holy. The menard is invaluable. The menard mosey the deina. If someone initialise the lucienne then they eat the deina. If someone is holy and they see the lucienne then they eat the menard. If someone mosey the lucienne and the lucienne meld the deina then the lucienne mosey the menard. If someone mosey the deina and the deina is holy then the deina initialise the menard. If someone meld the deina then they need the deina. If someone initialise the lucienne and they need the deina then they see the menard. The lucienne does not eat the menard.", "logic": "\nMeld(deina, lucienne)\nMeld(deina, menard)\nInvaluable(deina)\nMosey(deina, lucienne)\nInitialise(deina, lucienne)\nFerine(lucienne)\nHoly(lucienne)\nMosey(lucienne, deina)\nInitialise(lucienne, deina)\nInitialise(lucienne, menard)\nMeld(menard, deina)\nFerine(menard)\nHoly(menard)\nInvaluable(menard)\nMosey(menard, deina)\nforall x (Initialise(x, lucienne) -> Meld(x, deina))\nforall x (Holy(x) and Initialise(x, lucienne) -> Meld(x, menard))\nforall x (Mosey(x, lucienne) and Meld(lucienne, deina) -> Mosey(lucienne, menard))\nforall x (Mosey(x, deina) and Holy(deina) -> Initialise(deina, menard))\nforall x (Meld(x, deina) -> Mosey(x, deina))\nforall x (Initialise(x, lucienne) and Mosey(x, deina) -> Initialise(x, menard))\n\nnot Meld(lucienne, menard)\n\nforall x (Holy(x) and Initialise(x, lucienne) -> Meld(x, menard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The melicent fight the katey. The melicent fight the judie. The melicent is gamey. The melicent cronk the katey. The melicent express the katey. The katey is captive. The katey is armless. The katey cronk the melicent. The katey express the melicent. The katey express the judie. The judie fight the melicent. The judie is captive. The judie is armless. The judie is gamey. The judie cronk the melicent. If someone express the katey then they eat the melicent. If someone is armless and they see the katey then they eat the judie. If someone cronk the katey and the katey fight the melicent then the katey cronk the judie. If someone cronk the melicent and the melicent is armless then the melicent express the judie. If someone fight the melicent then they need the melicent. If someone express the katey and they need the melicent then they see the judie. The judie express the judie.", "logic": "\nFight(melicent, katey)\nFight(melicent, judie)\nGamey(melicent)\nCronk(melicent, katey)\nExpress(melicent, katey)\nCaptive(katey)\nArmless(katey)\nCronk(katey, melicent)\nExpress(katey, melicent)\nExpress(katey, judie)\nFight(judie, melicent)\nCaptive(judie)\nArmless(judie)\nGamey(judie)\nCronk(judie, melicent)\nforall x (Express(x, katey) -> Fight(x, melicent))\nforall x (Armless(x) and Express(x, katey) -> Fight(x, judie))\nforall x (Cronk(x, katey) and Fight(katey, melicent) -> Cronk(katey, judie))\nforall x (Cronk(x, melicent) and Armless(melicent) -> Express(melicent, judie))\nforall x (Fight(x, melicent) -> Cronk(x, melicent))\nforall x (Express(x, katey) and Cronk(x, melicent) -> Express(x, judie))\n\nExpress(judie, judie)\n\nforall x (Express(x, katey) and Cronk(x, melicent) -> Express(x, judie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The vikki barb the elaine. The vikki barb the trixi. The vikki is bloody. The vikki precook the elaine. The vikki sheathe the elaine. The elaine is jubilant. The elaine is pronged. The elaine precook the vikki. The elaine sheathe the vikki. The elaine sheathe the trixi. The trixi barb the vikki. The trixi is jubilant. The trixi is pronged. The trixi is bloody. The trixi precook the vikki. If someone sheathe the elaine then they eat the vikki. If someone is pronged and they see the elaine then they eat the trixi. If someone precook the elaine and the elaine barb the vikki then the elaine precook the trixi. If someone precook the vikki and the vikki is pronged then the vikki sheathe the trixi. If someone barb the vikki then they need the vikki. If someone sheathe the elaine and they need the vikki then they see the trixi. The trixi does not eat the trixi.", "logic": "\nBarb(vikki, elaine)\nBarb(vikki, trixi)\nBloody(vikki)\nPrecook(vikki, elaine)\nSheathe(vikki, elaine)\nJubilant(elaine)\nPronged(elaine)\nPrecook(elaine, vikki)\nSheathe(elaine, vikki)\nSheathe(elaine, trixi)\nBarb(trixi, vikki)\nJubilant(trixi)\nPronged(trixi)\nBloody(trixi)\nPrecook(trixi, vikki)\nforall x (Sheathe(x, elaine) -> Barb(x, vikki))\nforall x (Pronged(x) and Sheathe(x, elaine) -> Barb(x, trixi))\nforall x (Precook(x, elaine) and Barb(elaine, vikki) -> Precook(elaine, trixi))\nforall x (Precook(x, vikki) and Pronged(vikki) -> Sheathe(vikki, trixi))\nforall x (Barb(x, vikki) -> Precook(x, vikki))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, elaine) and Precook(x, vikki) -> Sheathe(x, trixi))\n\nnot Barb(trixi, trixi)\n\nforall x (Pronged(x) and Sheathe(x, elaine) -> Barb(x, trixi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The belle normalize the roda. The belle normalize the caron. The belle is altricial. The belle armour the roda. The belle intimate the roda. The roda is terrifying. The roda is ovate. The roda armour the belle. The roda intimate the belle. The roda intimate the caron. The caron normalize the belle. The caron is terrifying. The caron is ovate. The caron is altricial. The caron armour the belle. If someone intimate the roda then they eat the belle. If someone is ovate and they see the roda then they eat the caron. If someone armour the roda and the roda normalize the belle then the roda armour the caron. If someone armour the belle and the belle is ovate then the belle intimate the caron. If someone normalize the belle then they need the belle. If someone intimate the roda and they need the belle then they see the caron. The roda armour the caron.", "logic": "\nNormalize(belle, roda)\nNormalize(belle, caron)\nAltricial(belle)\nArmour(belle, roda)\nIntimate(belle, roda)\nTerrifying(roda)\nOvate(roda)\nArmour(roda, belle)\nIntimate(roda, belle)\nIntimate(roda, caron)\nNormalize(caron, belle)\nTerrifying(caron)\nOvate(caron)\nAltricial(caron)\nArmour(caron, belle)\nforall x (Intimate(x, roda) -> Normalize(x, belle))\nforall x (Ovate(x) and Intimate(x, roda) -> Normalize(x, caron))\nforall x (Armour(x, roda) and Normalize(roda, belle) -> Armour(roda, caron))\nforall x (Armour(x, belle) and Ovate(belle) -> Intimate(belle, caron))\nforall x (Normalize(x, belle) -> Armour(x, belle))\nforall x (Intimate(x, roda) and Armour(x, belle) -> Intimate(x, caron))\n\nArmour(roda, caron)\n\nforall x (Armour(x, roda) and Normalize(roda, belle) -> Armour(roda, caron)) <- forall x (Intimate(x, roda) -> Normalize(x, belle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The joelle mildew the jonah. The joelle mildew the boyd. The joelle is piscine. The joelle tutor the jonah. The joelle rival the jonah. The jonah is dumb. The jonah is bereaved. The jonah tutor the joelle. The jonah rival the joelle. The jonah rival the boyd. The boyd mildew the joelle. The boyd is dumb. The boyd is bereaved. The boyd is piscine. The boyd tutor the joelle. If someone rival the jonah then they eat the joelle. If someone is bereaved and they see the jonah then they eat the boyd. If someone tutor the jonah and the jonah mildew the joelle then the jonah tutor the boyd. If someone tutor the joelle and the joelle is bereaved then the joelle rival the boyd. If someone mildew the joelle then they need the joelle. If someone rival the jonah and they need the joelle then they see the boyd. The jonah is not green.", "logic": "\nMildew(joelle, jonah)\nMildew(joelle, boyd)\nPiscine(joelle)\nTutor(joelle, jonah)\nRival(joelle, jonah)\nDumb(jonah)\nBereaved(jonah)\nTutor(jonah, joelle)\nRival(jonah, joelle)\nRival(jonah, boyd)\nMildew(boyd, joelle)\nDumb(boyd)\nBereaved(boyd)\nPiscine(boyd)\nTutor(boyd, joelle)\nforall x (Rival(x, jonah) -> Mildew(x, joelle))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) and Rival(x, jonah) -> Mildew(x, boyd))\nforall x (Tutor(x, jonah) and Mildew(jonah, joelle) -> Tutor(jonah, boyd))\nforall x (Tutor(x, joelle) and Bereaved(joelle) -> Rival(joelle, boyd))\nforall x (Mildew(x, joelle) -> Tutor(x, joelle))\nforall x (Rival(x, jonah) and Tutor(x, joelle) -> Rival(x, boyd))\n\nnot Green(jonah)\n\nnot Green(jonah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The carmen seize the darian. The carmen seize the delmar. The carmen is methodist. The carmen clack the darian. The carmen major the darian. The darian is bipartite. The darian is burundi. The darian clack the carmen. The darian major the carmen. The darian major the delmar. The delmar seize the carmen. The delmar is bipartite. The delmar is burundi. The delmar is methodist. The delmar clack the carmen. If someone major the darian then they eat the carmen. If someone is burundi and they see the darian then they eat the delmar. If someone clack the darian and the darian seize the carmen then the darian clack the delmar. If someone clack the carmen and the carmen is burundi then the carmen major the delmar. If someone seize the carmen then they need the carmen. If someone major the darian and they need the carmen then they see the delmar. The carmen clack the delmar.", "logic": "\nSeize(carmen, darian)\nSeize(carmen, delmar)\nMethodist(carmen)\nClack(carmen, darian)\nMajor(carmen, darian)\nBipartite(darian)\nBurundi(darian)\nClack(darian, carmen)\nMajor(darian, carmen)\nMajor(darian, delmar)\nSeize(delmar, carmen)\nBipartite(delmar)\nBurundi(delmar)\nMethodist(delmar)\nClack(delmar, carmen)\nforall x (Major(x, darian) -> Seize(x, carmen))\nforall x (Burundi(x) and Major(x, darian) -> Seize(x, delmar))\nforall x (Clack(x, darian) and Seize(darian, carmen) -> Clack(darian, delmar))\nforall x (Clack(x, carmen) and Burundi(carmen) -> Major(carmen, delmar))\nforall x (Seize(x, carmen) -> Clack(x, carmen))\nforall x (Major(x, darian) and Clack(x, carmen) -> Major(x, delmar))\n\nClack(carmen, delmar)\n\nClack(carmen, delmar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The libbie crab the sutton. The libbie crab the estele. The libbie is cuspidal. The libbie stink the sutton. The libbie crosscut the sutton. The sutton is dropsical. The sutton is suspected. The sutton stink the libbie. The sutton crosscut the libbie. The sutton crosscut the estele. The estele crab the libbie. The estele is dropsical. The estele is suspected. The estele is cuspidal. The estele stink the libbie. If someone crosscut the sutton then they eat the libbie. If someone is suspected and they see the sutton then they eat the estele. If someone stink the sutton and the sutton crab the libbie then the sutton stink the estele. If someone stink the libbie and the libbie is suspected then the libbie crosscut the estele. If someone crab the libbie then they need the libbie. If someone crosscut the sutton and they need the libbie then they see the estele. The libbie is not suspected.", "logic": "\nCrab(libbie, sutton)\nCrab(libbie, estele)\nCuspidal(libbie)\nStink(libbie, sutton)\nCrosscut(libbie, sutton)\nDropsical(sutton)\nSuspected(sutton)\nStink(sutton, libbie)\nCrosscut(sutton, libbie)\nCrosscut(sutton, estele)\nCrab(estele, libbie)\nDropsical(estele)\nSuspected(estele)\nCuspidal(estele)\nStink(estele, libbie)\nforall x (Crosscut(x, sutton) -> Crab(x, libbie))\nforall x (Suspected(x) and Crosscut(x, sutton) -> Crab(x, estele))\nforall x (Stink(x, sutton) and Crab(sutton, libbie) -> Stink(sutton, estele))\nforall x (Stink(x, libbie) and Suspected(libbie) -> Crosscut(libbie, estele))\nforall x (Crab(x, libbie) -> Stink(x, libbie))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, sutton) and Stink(x, libbie) -> Crosscut(x, estele))\n\nnot Suspected(libbie)\n\nnot Suspected(libbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The vonnie shake the aline. The vonnie shake the buffy. The vonnie is snaky. The vonnie chevy the aline. The vonnie clash the aline. The aline is avoidable. The aline is rheumy. The aline chevy the vonnie. The aline clash the vonnie. The aline clash the buffy. The buffy shake the vonnie. The buffy is avoidable. The buffy is rheumy. The buffy is snaky. The buffy chevy the vonnie. If someone clash the aline then they eat the vonnie. If someone is rheumy and they see the aline then they eat the buffy. If someone chevy the aline and the aline shake the vonnie then the aline chevy the buffy. If someone chevy the vonnie and the vonnie is rheumy then the vonnie clash the buffy. If someone shake the vonnie then they need the vonnie. If someone clash the aline and they need the vonnie then they see the buffy. The aline shake the aline.", "logic": "\nShake(vonnie, aline)\nShake(vonnie, buffy)\nSnaky(vonnie)\nChevy(vonnie, aline)\nClash(vonnie, aline)\nAvoidable(aline)\nRheumy(aline)\nChevy(aline, vonnie)\nClash(aline, vonnie)\nClash(aline, buffy)\nShake(buffy, vonnie)\nAvoidable(buffy)\nRheumy(buffy)\nSnaky(buffy)\nChevy(buffy, vonnie)\nforall x (Clash(x, aline) -> Shake(x, vonnie))\nforall x (Rheumy(x) and Clash(x, aline) -> Shake(x, buffy))\nforall x (Chevy(x, aline) and Shake(aline, vonnie) -> Chevy(aline, buffy))\nforall x (Chevy(x, vonnie) and Rheumy(vonnie) -> Clash(vonnie, buffy))\nforall x (Shake(x, vonnie) -> Chevy(x, vonnie))\nforall x (Clash(x, aline) and Chevy(x, vonnie) -> Clash(x, buffy))\n\nShake(aline, aline)\n\nShake(aline, aline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The gibb undersign the jessica. The jessica is carangid. The lucky callous the kiah. The kiah is not carangid. If something undersign the gibb and it callous the gibb then the gibb is carangid. If something undersign the jessica then the jessica is not undried. If something is undried and it callous the gibb then the gibb callous the lucky. If the kiah bubble the gibb and the kiah does not see the gibb then the gibb callous the jessica. If something undersign the kiah then the kiah callous the jessica. If something is carangid and not undried then it undersign the kiah. The gibb undersign the jessica.", "logic": "\nUndersign(gibb, jessica)\nCarangid(jessica)\nCallous(lucky, kiah)\nnot Carangid(kiah)\nforall x (Undersign(x, gibb) and Callous(x, gibb) -> Carangid(gibb))\nforall x (Undersign(x, jessica) -> not Undried(jessica))\nforall x (Undried(x) and Callous(x, gibb) -> Callous(gibb, lucky))\nBubble(kiah, gibb) and not Undersign(kiah, gibb) -> Callous(gibb, jessica)\nforall x (Undersign(x, kiah) -> Callous(kiah, jessica))\nforall x (Carangid(x) and not Undried(x) -> Undersign(x, kiah))\n\nUndersign(gibb, jessica)\n\ntherefore Undersign(gibb, jessica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The ophelia kayak the yolane. The yolane is dickensian. The lottie obviate the gerhardt. The gerhardt is not dickensian. If something kayak the ophelia and it obviate the ophelia then the ophelia is dickensian. If something kayak the yolane then the yolane is not alary. If something is alary and it obviate the ophelia then the ophelia obviate the lottie. If the gerhardt adsorb the ophelia and the gerhardt does not see the ophelia then the ophelia obviate the yolane. If something kayak the gerhardt then the gerhardt obviate the yolane. If something is dickensian and not alary then it kayak the gerhardt. The yolane is not dickensian.", "logic": "\nKayak(ophelia, yolane)\nDickensian(yolane)\nObviate(lottie, gerhardt)\nnot Dickensian(gerhardt)\nforall x (Kayak(x, ophelia) and Obviate(x, ophelia) -> Dickensian(ophelia))\nforall x (Kayak(x, yolane) -> not Alary(yolane))\nforall x (Alary(x) and Obviate(x, ophelia) -> Obviate(ophelia, lottie))\nAdsorb(gerhardt, ophelia) and not Kayak(gerhardt, ophelia) -> Obviate(ophelia, yolane)\nforall x (Kayak(x, gerhardt) -> Obviate(gerhardt, yolane))\nforall x (Dickensian(x) and not Alary(x) -> Kayak(x, gerhardt))\n\nnot Dickensian(yolane)\n\ntherefore Dickensian(yolane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The sinclair deport the gennifer. The gennifer is financial. The layla crisp the ernaline. The ernaline is not financial. If something deport the sinclair and it crisp the sinclair then the sinclair is financial. If something deport the gennifer then the gennifer is not saving. If something is saving and it crisp the sinclair then the sinclair crisp the layla. If the ernaline repoint the sinclair and the ernaline does not see the sinclair then the sinclair crisp the gennifer. If something deport the ernaline then the ernaline crisp the gennifer. If something is financial and not saving then it deport the ernaline. The gennifer is not saving.", "logic": "\nDeport(sinclair, gennifer)\nFinancial(gennifer)\nCrisp(layla, ernaline)\nnot Financial(ernaline)\nforall x (Deport(x, sinclair) and Crisp(x, sinclair) -> Financial(sinclair))\nforall x (Deport(x, gennifer) -> not Saving(gennifer))\nforall x (Saving(x) and Crisp(x, sinclair) -> Crisp(sinclair, layla))\nRepoint(ernaline, sinclair) and not Deport(ernaline, sinclair) -> Crisp(sinclair, gennifer)\nforall x (Deport(x, ernaline) -> Crisp(ernaline, gennifer))\nforall x (Financial(x) and not Saving(x) -> Deport(x, ernaline))\n\nnot Saving(gennifer)\n\nDeport(sinclair, gennifer) and forall x (Deport(x, gennifer) -> not Saving(gennifer)) -> therefore not Saving(gennifer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The hillery waggle the keil. The keil is auspicious. The darrel interpose the corri. The corri is not auspicious. If something waggle the hillery and it interpose the hillery then the hillery is auspicious. If something waggle the keil then the keil is not thematic. If something is thematic and it interpose the hillery then the hillery interpose the darrel. If the corri socialize the hillery and the corri does not see the hillery then the hillery interpose the keil. If something waggle the corri then the corri interpose the keil. If something is auspicious and not thematic then it waggle the corri. The keil is thematic.", "logic": "\nWaggle(hillery, keil)\nAuspicious(keil)\nInterpose(darrel, corri)\nnot Auspicious(corri)\nforall x (Waggle(x, hillery) and Interpose(x, hillery) -> Auspicious(hillery))\nforall x (Waggle(x, keil) -> not Thematic(keil))\nforall x (Thematic(x) and Interpose(x, hillery) -> Interpose(hillery, darrel))\nSocialize(corri, hillery) and not Waggle(corri, hillery) -> Interpose(hillery, keil)\nforall x (Waggle(x, corri) -> Interpose(corri, keil))\nforall x (Auspicious(x) and not Thematic(x) -> Waggle(x, corri))\n\nThematic(keil)\n\nWaggle(hillery, keil) and forall x (Waggle(x, keil) -> not Thematic(keil)) -> therefore not Thematic(keil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The gabe birth the aurie. The aurie is poignant. The connie dunk the vannie. The vannie is not poignant. If something birth the gabe and it dunk the gabe then the gabe is poignant. If something birth the aurie then the aurie is not judaic. If something is judaic and it dunk the gabe then the gabe dunk the connie. If the vannie figure the gabe and the vannie does not see the gabe then the gabe dunk the aurie. If something birth the vannie then the vannie dunk the aurie. If something is poignant and not judaic then it birth the vannie. The aurie birth the vannie.", "logic": "\nBirth(gabe, aurie)\nPoignant(aurie)\nDunk(connie, vannie)\nnot Poignant(vannie)\nforall x (Birth(x, gabe) and Dunk(x, gabe) -> Poignant(gabe))\nforall x (Birth(x, aurie) -> not Judaic(aurie))\nforall x (Judaic(x) and Dunk(x, gabe) -> Dunk(gabe, connie))\nFigure(vannie, gabe) and not Birth(vannie, gabe) -> Dunk(gabe, aurie)\nforall x (Birth(x, vannie) -> Dunk(vannie, aurie))\nforall x (Poignant(x) and not Judaic(x) -> Birth(x, vannie))\n\nBirth(aurie, vannie)\n\nBirth(gabe, aurie) and forall x (Birth(x, aurie) -> not Judaic(aurie)) -> therefore not Judaic(aurie) Poignant(aurie) and not Judaic(aurie) and forall x (Poignant(x) and not Judaic(x) -> Birth(x, vannie)) -> therefore Birth(aurie, vannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The garret extradite the godfrey. The godfrey is fivefold. The matthieu prize the erny. The erny is not fivefold. If something extradite the garret and it prize the garret then the garret is fivefold. If something extradite the godfrey then the godfrey is not captivated. If something is captivated and it prize the garret then the garret prize the matthieu. If the erny defect the garret and the erny does not see the garret then the garret prize the godfrey. If something extradite the erny then the erny prize the godfrey. If something is fivefold and not captivated then it extradite the erny. The godfrey does not see the erny.", "logic": "\nExtradite(garret, godfrey)\nFivefold(godfrey)\nPrize(matthieu, erny)\nnot Fivefold(erny)\nforall x (Extradite(x, garret) and Prize(x, garret) -> Fivefold(garret))\nforall x (Extradite(x, godfrey) -> not Captivated(godfrey))\nforall x (Captivated(x) and Prize(x, garret) -> Prize(garret, matthieu))\nDefect(erny, garret) and not Extradite(erny, garret) -> Prize(garret, godfrey)\nforall x (Extradite(x, erny) -> Prize(erny, godfrey))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) and not Captivated(x) -> Extradite(x, erny))\n\nnot Extradite(godfrey, erny)\n\nExtradite(garret, godfrey) and forall x (Extradite(x, godfrey) -> not Captivated(godfrey)) -> therefore not Captivated(godfrey) Fivefold(godfrey) and not Captivated(godfrey) and forall x (Fivefold(x) and not Captivated(x) -> Extradite(x, erny)) -> therefore Extradite(godfrey, erny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The carol upset the antonina. The antonina is segmented. The marielle anoint the pacifica. The pacifica is not segmented. If something upset the carol and it anoint the carol then the carol is segmented. If something upset the antonina then the antonina is not spanish. If something is spanish and it anoint the carol then the carol anoint the marielle. If the pacifica bowse the carol and the pacifica does not see the carol then the carol anoint the antonina. If something upset the pacifica then the pacifica anoint the antonina. If something is segmented and not spanish then it upset the pacifica. The pacifica anoint the antonina.", "logic": "\nUpset(carol, antonina)\nSegmented(antonina)\nAnoint(marielle, pacifica)\nnot Segmented(pacifica)\nforall x (Upset(x, carol) and Anoint(x, carol) -> Segmented(carol))\nforall x (Upset(x, antonina) -> not Spanish(antonina))\nforall x (Spanish(x) and Anoint(x, carol) -> Anoint(carol, marielle))\nBowse(pacifica, carol) and not Upset(pacifica, carol) -> Anoint(carol, antonina)\nforall x (Upset(x, pacifica) -> Anoint(pacifica, antonina))\nforall x (Segmented(x) and not Spanish(x) -> Upset(x, pacifica))\n\nAnoint(pacifica, antonina)\n\nUpset(carol, antonina) and forall x (Upset(x, antonina) -> not Spanish(antonina)) -> therefore not Spanish(antonina) Segmented(antonina) and not Spanish(antonina) and forall x (Segmented(x) and not Spanish(x) -> Upset(x, pacifica)) -> therefore Upset(antonina, pacifica) Upset(antonina, pacifica) and forall x (Upset(x, pacifica) -> Anoint(pacifica, antonina)) -> therefore Anoint(pacifica, antonina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The barthel didder the hank. The hank is caudate. The aldis learn the tomas. The tomas is not caudate. If something didder the barthel and it learn the barthel then the barthel is caudate. If something didder the hank then the hank is not fortunate. If something is fortunate and it learn the barthel then the barthel learn the aldis. If the tomas implore the barthel and the tomas does not see the barthel then the barthel learn the hank. If something didder the tomas then the tomas learn the hank. If something is caudate and not fortunate then it didder the tomas. The tomas does not visit the hank.", "logic": "\nDidder(barthel, hank)\nCaudate(hank)\nLearn(aldis, tomas)\nnot Caudate(tomas)\nforall x (Didder(x, barthel) and Learn(x, barthel) -> Caudate(barthel))\nforall x (Didder(x, hank) -> not Fortunate(hank))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) and Learn(x, barthel) -> Learn(barthel, aldis))\nImplore(tomas, barthel) and not Didder(tomas, barthel) -> Learn(barthel, hank)\nforall x (Didder(x, tomas) -> Learn(tomas, hank))\nforall x (Caudate(x) and not Fortunate(x) -> Didder(x, tomas))\n\nnot Learn(tomas, hank)\n\nDidder(barthel, hank) and forall x (Didder(x, hank) -> not Fortunate(hank)) -> therefore not Fortunate(hank) Caudate(hank) and not Fortunate(hank) and forall x (Caudate(x) and not Fortunate(x) -> Didder(x, tomas)) -> therefore Didder(hank, tomas) Didder(hank, tomas) and forall x (Didder(x, tomas) -> Learn(tomas, hank)) -> therefore Learn(tomas, hank)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The robinetta disforest the secunda. The secunda is sanitised. The isa laicize the rosita. The rosita is not sanitised. If something disforest the robinetta and it laicize the robinetta then the robinetta is sanitised. If something disforest the secunda then the secunda is not retrorse. If something is retrorse and it laicize the robinetta then the robinetta laicize the isa. If the rosita adduct the robinetta and the rosita does not see the robinetta then the robinetta laicize the secunda. If something disforest the rosita then the rosita laicize the secunda. If something is sanitised and not retrorse then it disforest the rosita. The robinetta does not visit the isa.", "logic": "\nDisforest(robinetta, secunda)\nSanitised(secunda)\nLaicize(isa, rosita)\nnot Sanitised(rosita)\nforall x (Disforest(x, robinetta) and Laicize(x, robinetta) -> Sanitised(robinetta))\nforall x (Disforest(x, secunda) -> not Retrorse(secunda))\nforall x (Retrorse(x) and Laicize(x, robinetta) -> Laicize(robinetta, isa))\nAdduct(rosita, robinetta) and not Disforest(rosita, robinetta) -> Laicize(robinetta, secunda)\nforall x (Disforest(x, rosita) -> Laicize(rosita, secunda))\nforall x (Sanitised(x) and not Retrorse(x) -> Disforest(x, rosita))\n\nnot Laicize(robinetta, isa)\n\nforall x (Retrorse(x) and Laicize(x, robinetta) -> Laicize(robinetta, isa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The rosene knuckle the price. The price is vaginal. The ansel benumb the westbrook. The westbrook is not vaginal. If something knuckle the rosene and it benumb the rosene then the rosene is vaginal. If something knuckle the price then the price is not unlucky. If something is unlucky and it benumb the rosene then the rosene benumb the ansel. If the westbrook dishonour the rosene and the westbrook does not see the rosene then the rosene benumb the price. If something knuckle the westbrook then the westbrook benumb the price. If something is vaginal and not unlucky then it knuckle the westbrook. The ansel knuckle the westbrook.", "logic": "\nKnuckle(rosene, price)\nVaginal(price)\nBenumb(ansel, westbrook)\nnot Vaginal(westbrook)\nforall x (Knuckle(x, rosene) and Benumb(x, rosene) -> Vaginal(rosene))\nforall x (Knuckle(x, price) -> not Unlucky(price))\nforall x (Unlucky(x) and Benumb(x, rosene) -> Benumb(rosene, ansel))\nDishonour(westbrook, rosene) and not Knuckle(westbrook, rosene) -> Benumb(rosene, price)\nforall x (Knuckle(x, westbrook) -> Benumb(westbrook, price))\nforall x (Vaginal(x) and not Unlucky(x) -> Knuckle(x, westbrook))\n\nKnuckle(ansel, westbrook)\n\nforall x (Vaginal(x) and not Unlucky(x) -> Knuckle(x, westbrook)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The len goggle the willdon. The willdon is uncritical. The jennilee fume the jenna. The jenna is not uncritical. If something goggle the len and it fume the len then the len is uncritical. If something goggle the willdon then the willdon is not sewn. If something is sewn and it fume the len then the len fume the jennilee. If the jenna snuff the len and the jenna does not see the len then the len fume the willdon. If something goggle the jenna then the jenna fume the willdon. If something is uncritical and not sewn then it goggle the jenna. The jenna does not see the jenna.", "logic": "\nGoggle(len, willdon)\nUncritical(willdon)\nFume(jennilee, jenna)\nnot Uncritical(jenna)\nforall x (Goggle(x, len) and Fume(x, len) -> Uncritical(len))\nforall x (Goggle(x, willdon) -> not Sewn(willdon))\nforall x (Sewn(x) and Fume(x, len) -> Fume(len, jennilee))\nSnuff(jenna, len) and not Goggle(jenna, len) -> Fume(len, willdon)\nforall x (Goggle(x, jenna) -> Fume(jenna, willdon))\nforall x (Uncritical(x) and not Sewn(x) -> Goggle(x, jenna))\n\nnot Goggle(jenna, jenna)\n\nforall x (Uncritical(x) and not Sewn(x) -> Goggle(x, jenna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The maurie eternize the cody. The cody is pursuing. The titus foregather the benedetta. The benedetta is not pursuing. If something eternize the maurie and it foregather the maurie then the maurie is pursuing. If something eternize the cody then the cody is not thalassic. If something is thalassic and it foregather the maurie then the maurie foregather the titus. If the benedetta cinematize the maurie and the benedetta does not see the maurie then the maurie foregather the cody. If something eternize the benedetta then the benedetta foregather the cody. If something is pursuing and not thalassic then it eternize the benedetta. The maurie is pursuing.", "logic": "\nEternize(maurie, cody)\nPursuing(cody)\nForegather(titus, benedetta)\nnot Pursuing(benedetta)\nforall x (Eternize(x, maurie) and Foregather(x, maurie) -> Pursuing(maurie))\nforall x (Eternize(x, cody) -> not Thalassic(cody))\nforall x (Thalassic(x) and Foregather(x, maurie) -> Foregather(maurie, titus))\nCinematize(benedetta, maurie) and not Eternize(benedetta, maurie) -> Foregather(maurie, cody)\nforall x (Eternize(x, benedetta) -> Foregather(benedetta, cody))\nforall x (Pursuing(x) and not Thalassic(x) -> Eternize(x, benedetta))\n\nPursuing(maurie)\n\nforall x (Eternize(x, maurie) and Foregather(x, maurie) -> Pursuing(maurie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The sondra cheerlead the rodrigo. The rodrigo is mesolithic. The lennie draught the betteann. The betteann is not mesolithic. If something cheerlead the sondra and it draught the sondra then the sondra is mesolithic. If something cheerlead the rodrigo then the rodrigo is not scowling. If something is scowling and it draught the sondra then the sondra draught the lennie. If the betteann itch the sondra and the betteann does not see the sondra then the sondra draught the rodrigo. If something cheerlead the betteann then the betteann draught the rodrigo. If something is mesolithic and not scowling then it cheerlead the betteann. The lennie does not see the sondra.", "logic": "\nCheerlead(sondra, rodrigo)\nMesolithic(rodrigo)\nDraught(lennie, betteann)\nnot Mesolithic(betteann)\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, sondra) and Draught(x, sondra) -> Mesolithic(sondra))\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, rodrigo) -> not Scowling(rodrigo))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Draught(x, sondra) -> Draught(sondra, lennie))\nItch(betteann, sondra) and not Cheerlead(betteann, sondra) -> Draught(sondra, rodrigo)\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, betteann) -> Draught(betteann, rodrigo))\nforall x (Mesolithic(x) and not Scowling(x) -> Cheerlead(x, betteann))\n\nnot Cheerlead(lennie, sondra)\n\nnot Cheerlead(lennie, sondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The mic rehearse the maud. The maud is laputan. The charmaine heliograph the augustus. The augustus is not laputan. If something rehearse the mic and it heliograph the mic then the mic is laputan. If something rehearse the maud then the maud is not rabbinic. If something is rabbinic and it heliograph the mic then the mic heliograph the charmaine. If the augustus stomp the mic and the augustus does not see the mic then the mic heliograph the maud. If something rehearse the augustus then the augustus heliograph the maud. If something is laputan and not rabbinic then it rehearse the augustus. The charmaine rehearse the charmaine.", "logic": "\nRehearse(mic, maud)\nLaputan(maud)\nHeliograph(charmaine, augustus)\nnot Laputan(augustus)\nforall x (Rehearse(x, mic) and Heliograph(x, mic) -> Laputan(mic))\nforall x (Rehearse(x, maud) -> not Rabbinic(maud))\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) and Heliograph(x, mic) -> Heliograph(mic, charmaine))\nStomp(augustus, mic) and not Rehearse(augustus, mic) -> Heliograph(mic, maud)\nforall x (Rehearse(x, augustus) -> Heliograph(augustus, maud))\nforall x (Laputan(x) and not Rabbinic(x) -> Rehearse(x, augustus))\n\nRehearse(charmaine, charmaine)\n\nRehearse(charmaine, charmaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The quinton subtilise the jaclin. The jaclin is confounded. The lil plagiarise the shaun. The shaun is not confounded. If something subtilise the quinton and it plagiarise the quinton then the quinton is confounded. If something subtilise the jaclin then the jaclin is not nonslip. If something is nonslip and it plagiarise the quinton then the quinton plagiarise the lil. If the shaun clap the quinton and the shaun does not see the quinton then the quinton plagiarise the jaclin. If something subtilise the shaun then the shaun plagiarise the jaclin. If something is confounded and not nonslip then it subtilise the shaun. The quinton does not see the lil.", "logic": "\nSubtilise(quinton, jaclin)\nConfounded(jaclin)\nPlagiarise(lil, shaun)\nnot Confounded(shaun)\nforall x (Subtilise(x, quinton) and Plagiarise(x, quinton) -> Confounded(quinton))\nforall x (Subtilise(x, jaclin) -> not Nonslip(jaclin))\nforall x (Nonslip(x) and Plagiarise(x, quinton) -> Plagiarise(quinton, lil))\nClap(shaun, quinton) and not Subtilise(shaun, quinton) -> Plagiarise(quinton, jaclin)\nforall x (Subtilise(x, shaun) -> Plagiarise(shaun, jaclin))\nforall x (Confounded(x) and not Nonslip(x) -> Subtilise(x, shaun))\n\nnot Subtilise(quinton, lil)\n\nnot Subtilise(quinton, lil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The sheril linearize the serene. The serene is soprano. The casandra reform the harvey. The harvey is not soprano. If something linearize the sheril and it reform the sheril then the sheril is soprano. If something linearize the serene then the serene is not unbeknown. If something is unbeknown and it reform the sheril then the sheril reform the casandra. If the harvey skirl the sheril and the harvey does not see the sheril then the sheril reform the serene. If something linearize the harvey then the harvey reform the serene. If something is soprano and not unbeknown then it linearize the harvey. The sheril is cold.", "logic": "\nLinearize(sheril, serene)\nSoprano(serene)\nReform(casandra, harvey)\nnot Soprano(harvey)\nforall x (Linearize(x, sheril) and Reform(x, sheril) -> Soprano(sheril))\nforall x (Linearize(x, serene) -> not Unbeknown(serene))\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) and Reform(x, sheril) -> Reform(sheril, casandra))\nSkirl(harvey, sheril) and not Linearize(harvey, sheril) -> Reform(sheril, serene)\nforall x (Linearize(x, harvey) -> Reform(harvey, serene))\nforall x (Soprano(x) and not Unbeknown(x) -> Linearize(x, harvey))\n\nCold(sheril)\n\nCold(sheril) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The hermina is decorous. Young people are manorial. All calcitic people are manorial. If the hermina is manorial and the hermina is decorous then the hermina is calcitic. All decorous people are selfish. All bizonal people are selfish. If someone is bizonal and decorous then they are selfish. If someone is selfish then they are calcitic. If the hermina is selfish and the hermina is manorial then the hermina is not bizonal. The hermina is decorous.", "logic": "\nDecorous(hermina)\nforall x (Calcitic(x) -> Manorial(x))\nforall x (Calcitic(x) -> Manorial(x))\nManorial(hermina) and Decorous(hermina) -> Calcitic(hermina)\nforall x (Decorous(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) and Decorous(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Selfish(x) -> Calcitic(x))\nSelfish(hermina) and Manorial(hermina) -> not Bizonal(hermina)\n\nDecorous(hermina)\n\ntherefore Decorous(hermina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The philbert is airy. Young people are egoistical. All ovular people are egoistical. If the philbert is egoistical and the philbert is airy then the philbert is ovular. All airy people are stringy. All vaporific people are stringy. If someone is vaporific and airy then they are stringy. If someone is stringy then they are ovular. If the philbert is stringy and the philbert is egoistical then the philbert is not vaporific. The philbert is not airy.", "logic": "\nAiry(philbert)\nforall x (Ovular(x) -> Egoistical(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) -> Egoistical(x))\nEgoistical(philbert) and Airy(philbert) -> Ovular(philbert)\nforall x (Airy(x) -> Stringy(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) -> Stringy(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) and Airy(x) -> Stringy(x))\nforall x (Stringy(x) -> Ovular(x))\nStringy(philbert) and Egoistical(philbert) -> not Vaporific(philbert)\n\nnot Airy(philbert)\n\ntherefore Airy(philbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The purcell is venturous. Young people are handelian. All advancing people are handelian. If the purcell is handelian and the purcell is venturous then the purcell is advancing. All venturous people are entrenched. All classic people are entrenched. If someone is classic and venturous then they are entrenched. If someone is entrenched then they are advancing. If the purcell is entrenched and the purcell is handelian then the purcell is not classic. The purcell is entrenched.", "logic": "\nVenturous(purcell)\nforall x (Advancing(x) -> Handelian(x))\nforall x (Advancing(x) -> Handelian(x))\nHandelian(purcell) and Venturous(purcell) -> Advancing(purcell)\nforall x (Venturous(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Classic(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Classic(x) and Venturous(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Entrenched(x) -> Advancing(x))\nEntrenched(purcell) and Handelian(purcell) -> not Classic(purcell)\n\nEntrenched(purcell)\n\nVenturous(purcell) and forall x (Venturous(x) -> Entrenched(x)) -> therefore Entrenched(purcell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The katharyn is blate. Young people are paroxysmal. All screwy people are paroxysmal. If the katharyn is paroxysmal and the katharyn is blate then the katharyn is screwy. All blate people are concave. All calendered people are concave. If someone is calendered and blate then they are concave. If someone is concave then they are screwy. If the katharyn is concave and the katharyn is paroxysmal then the katharyn is not calendered. The katharyn is not concave.", "logic": "\nBlate(katharyn)\nforall x (Screwy(x) -> Paroxysmal(x))\nforall x (Screwy(x) -> Paroxysmal(x))\nParoxysmal(katharyn) and Blate(katharyn) -> Screwy(katharyn)\nforall x (Blate(x) -> Concave(x))\nforall x (Calendered(x) -> Concave(x))\nforall x (Calendered(x) and Blate(x) -> Concave(x))\nforall x (Concave(x) -> Screwy(x))\nConcave(katharyn) and Paroxysmal(katharyn) -> not Calendered(katharyn)\n\nnot Concave(katharyn)\n\nBlate(katharyn) and forall x (Blate(x) -> Concave(x)) -> therefore Concave(katharyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The sabra is prize. Young people are fistulous. All honorable people are fistulous. If the sabra is fistulous and the sabra is prize then the sabra is honorable. All prize people are emblematic. All crackers people are emblematic. If someone is crackers and prize then they are emblematic. If someone is emblematic then they are honorable. If the sabra is emblematic and the sabra is fistulous then the sabra is not crackers. The sabra is honorable.", "logic": "\nPrize(sabra)\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nFistulous(sabra) and Prize(sabra) -> Honorable(sabra)\nforall x (Prize(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) and Prize(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Honorable(x))\nEmblematic(sabra) and Fistulous(sabra) -> not Crackers(sabra)\n\nHonorable(sabra)\n\nPrize(sabra) and forall x (Prize(x) -> Emblematic(x)) -> therefore Emblematic(sabra) Emblematic(sabra) and forall x (Emblematic(x) -> Honorable(x)) -> therefore Honorable(sabra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The noelle is ineligible. Young people are damaged. All electoral people are damaged. If the noelle is damaged and the noelle is ineligible then the noelle is electoral. All ineligible people are calceiform. All laboured people are calceiform. If someone is laboured and ineligible then they are calceiform. If someone is calceiform then they are electoral. If the noelle is calceiform and the noelle is damaged then the noelle is not laboured. The noelle is not electoral.", "logic": "\nIneligible(noelle)\nforall x (Electoral(x) -> Damaged(x))\nforall x (Electoral(x) -> Damaged(x))\nDamaged(noelle) and Ineligible(noelle) -> Electoral(noelle)\nforall x (Ineligible(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) and Ineligible(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> Electoral(x))\nCalceiform(noelle) and Damaged(noelle) -> not Laboured(noelle)\n\nnot Electoral(noelle)\n\nIneligible(noelle) and forall x (Ineligible(x) -> Calceiform(x)) -> therefore Calceiform(noelle) Calceiform(noelle) and forall x (Calceiform(x) -> Electoral(x)) -> therefore Electoral(noelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The nancee is glowing. Young people are voluntary. All singing people are voluntary. If the nancee is voluntary and the nancee is glowing then the nancee is singing. All glowing people are tactical. All unhopeful people are tactical. If someone is unhopeful and glowing then they are tactical. If someone is tactical then they are singing. If the nancee is tactical and the nancee is voluntary then the nancee is not unhopeful. The nancee is voluntary.", "logic": "\nGlowing(nancee)\nforall x (Singing(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nforall x (Singing(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nVoluntary(nancee) and Glowing(nancee) -> Singing(nancee)\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) and Glowing(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Singing(x))\nTactical(nancee) and Voluntary(nancee) -> not Unhopeful(nancee)\n\nVoluntary(nancee)\n\nGlowing(nancee) and forall x (Glowing(x) -> Tactical(x)) -> therefore Tactical(nancee) Tactical(nancee) and forall x (Tactical(x) -> Singing(x)) -> therefore Singing(nancee) Singing(nancee) and forall x (Singing(x) -> Voluntary(x)) -> therefore Voluntary(nancee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The somerset is costumed. Young people are semisoft. All almighty people are semisoft. If the somerset is semisoft and the somerset is costumed then the somerset is almighty. All costumed people are protozoic. All piggish people are protozoic. If someone is piggish and costumed then they are protozoic. If someone is protozoic then they are almighty. If the somerset is protozoic and the somerset is semisoft then the somerset is not piggish. The somerset is not semisoft.", "logic": "\nCostumed(somerset)\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Semisoft(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Semisoft(x))\nSemisoft(somerset) and Costumed(somerset) -> Almighty(somerset)\nforall x (Costumed(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Piggish(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Piggish(x) and Costumed(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) -> Almighty(x))\nProtozoic(somerset) and Semisoft(somerset) -> not Piggish(somerset)\n\nnot Semisoft(somerset)\n\nCostumed(somerset) and forall x (Costumed(x) -> Protozoic(x)) -> therefore Protozoic(somerset) Protozoic(somerset) and forall x (Protozoic(x) -> Almighty(x)) -> therefore Almighty(somerset) Almighty(somerset) and forall x (Almighty(x) -> Semisoft(x)) -> therefore Semisoft(somerset)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The jillie is amazed. Young people are astir. All salutary people are astir. If the jillie is astir and the jillie is amazed then the jillie is salutary. All amazed people are allocable. All eudemonic people are allocable. If someone is eudemonic and amazed then they are allocable. If someone is allocable then they are salutary. If the jillie is allocable and the jillie is astir then the jillie is not eudemonic. The jillie does not eat the jillie.", "logic": "\nAmazed(jillie)\nforall x (Salutary(x) -> Astir(x))\nforall x (Salutary(x) -> Astir(x))\nAstir(jillie) and Amazed(jillie) -> Salutary(jillie)\nforall x (Amazed(x) -> Allocable(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) -> Allocable(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) and Amazed(x) -> Allocable(x))\nforall x (Allocable(x) -> Salutary(x))\nAllocable(jillie) and Astir(jillie) -> not Eudemonic(jillie)\n\nnot Eats(jillie, jillie)\n\nnot Eats(jillie, jillie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The umberto is bulblike. Young people are nonpublic. All unawakened people are nonpublic. If the umberto is nonpublic and the umberto is bulblike then the umberto is unawakened. All bulblike people are then. All dilettante people are then. If someone is dilettante and bulblike then they are then. If someone is then then they are unawakened. If the umberto is then and the umberto is nonpublic then the umberto is not dilettante. The umberto likes the umberto.", "logic": "\nBulblike(umberto)\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\nNonpublic(umberto) and Bulblike(umberto) -> Unawakened(umberto)\nforall x (Bulblike(x) -> Then(x))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Then(x))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) and Bulblike(x) -> Then(x))\nforall x (Then(x) -> Unawakened(x))\nThen(umberto) and Nonpublic(umberto) -> not Dilettante(umberto)\n\nLikes(umberto, umberto)\n\nLikes(umberto, umberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "Archy is not telltale. Kore is thirteenth. Clarita is telltale. Munmro is not advertent. If Clarita is acarpelous then Clarita is locomotive. All telltale people are advertent. All lxxxiii people are thirteenth. White people are thirteenth. All advertent people are lxxxiii. If someone is benthonic and locomotive then they are acarpelous. Clarita is telltale.", "logic": "\nnot Telltale(archy)\nThirteenth(kore)\nTelltale(clarita)\nnot Advertent(munmro)\nAcarpelous(clarita) -> Locomotive(clarita)\nforall x (Telltale(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Locomotive(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Benthonic(x) and Locomotive(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\n\nTelltale(clarita)\n\ntherefore Telltale(clarita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Rosalinde is not maverick. Berri is expiative. Mikel is maverick. Lavinie is not naming. If Mikel is combined then Mikel is juvenile. All maverick people are naming. All inhumed people are expiative. White people are expiative. All naming people are inhumed. If someone is mundane and juvenile then they are combined. Mikel is not maverick.", "logic": "\nnot Maverick(rosalinde)\nExpiative(berri)\nMaverick(mikel)\nnot Naming(lavinie)\nCombined(mikel) -> Juvenile(mikel)\nforall x (Maverick(x) -> Naming(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Expiative(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) -> Expiative(x))\nforall x (Naming(x) -> Inhumed(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) and Juvenile(x) -> Combined(x))\n\nnot Maverick(mikel)\n\ntherefore Maverick(mikel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Ronni is not delinquent. Scarface is clinched. Sophia is delinquent. Adlai is not neurotic. If Sophia is subjugable then Sophia is amphoric. All delinquent people are neurotic. All uppish people are clinched. White people are clinched. All neurotic people are uppish. If someone is unerasable and amphoric then they are subjugable. Sophia is neurotic.", "logic": "\nnot Delinquent(ronni)\nClinched(scarface)\nDelinquent(sophia)\nnot Neurotic(adlai)\nSubjugable(sophia) -> Amphoric(sophia)\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Uppish(x) -> Clinched(x))\nforall x (Amphoric(x) -> Clinched(x))\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Uppish(x))\nforall x (Unerasable(x) and Amphoric(x) -> Subjugable(x))\n\nNeurotic(sophia)\n\nDelinquent(sophia) and forall x (Delinquent(x) -> Neurotic(x)) -> therefore Neurotic(sophia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Cinda is not aseptic. Fina is sleepy. Randolf is aseptic. Archibald is not accidental. If Randolf is arithmetic then Randolf is tenderized. All aseptic people are accidental. All vaporific people are sleepy. White people are sleepy. All accidental people are vaporific. If someone is wifely and tenderized then they are arithmetic. Randolf is not accidental.", "logic": "\nnot Aseptic(cinda)\nSleepy(fina)\nAseptic(randolf)\nnot Accidental(archibald)\nArithmetic(randolf) -> Tenderized(randolf)\nforall x (Aseptic(x) -> Accidental(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) -> Sleepy(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Sleepy(x))\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Vaporific(x))\nforall x (Wifely(x) and Tenderized(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\n\nnot Accidental(randolf)\n\nAseptic(randolf) and forall x (Aseptic(x) -> Accidental(x)) -> therefore Accidental(randolf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Dulcea is not biface. Hiralal is financial. Lib is biface. Jana is not bacchic. If Lib is loving then Lib is forehand. All biface people are bacchic. All mysophobic people are financial. White people are financial. All bacchic people are mysophobic. If someone is upstairs and forehand then they are loving. Lib is mysophobic.", "logic": "\nnot Biface(dulcea)\nFinancial(hiralal)\nBiface(lib)\nnot Bacchic(jana)\nLoving(lib) -> Forehand(lib)\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Mysophobic(x) -> Financial(x))\nforall x (Forehand(x) -> Financial(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Upstairs(x) and Forehand(x) -> Loving(x))\n\nMysophobic(lib)\n\nBiface(lib) and forall x (Biface(x) -> Bacchic(x)) -> therefore Bacchic(lib) Bacchic(lib) and forall x (Bacchic(x) -> Mysophobic(x)) -> therefore Mysophobic(lib)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Debbra is not yuman. Jerzy is basophilic. Benjie is yuman. Ranna is not acinous. If Benjie is treelike then Benjie is unladylike. All yuman people are acinous. All obviating people are basophilic. White people are basophilic. All acinous people are obviating. If someone is skinnerian and unladylike then they are treelike. Benjie is not obviating.", "logic": "\nnot Yuman(debbra)\nBasophilic(jerzy)\nYuman(benjie)\nnot Acinous(ranna)\nTreelike(benjie) -> Unladylike(benjie)\nforall x (Yuman(x) -> Acinous(x))\nforall x (Obviating(x) -> Basophilic(x))\nforall x (Unladylike(x) -> Basophilic(x))\nforall x (Acinous(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Skinnerian(x) and Unladylike(x) -> Treelike(x))\n\nnot Obviating(benjie)\n\nYuman(benjie) and forall x (Yuman(x) -> Acinous(x)) -> therefore Acinous(benjie) Acinous(benjie) and forall x (Acinous(x) -> Obviating(x)) -> therefore Obviating(benjie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Fiorenze is not smoggy. Kalvin is iridaceous. Clarice is smoggy. Laverna is not jacksonian. If Clarice is wheezy then Clarice is isoclinal. All smoggy people are jacksonian. All rhetorical people are iridaceous. White people are iridaceous. All jacksonian people are rhetorical. If someone is maltese and isoclinal then they are wheezy. Clarice is iridaceous.", "logic": "\nnot Smoggy(fiorenze)\nIridaceous(kalvin)\nSmoggy(clarice)\nnot Jacksonian(laverna)\nWheezy(clarice) -> Isoclinal(clarice)\nforall x (Smoggy(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nforall x (Rhetorical(x) -> Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Isoclinal(x) -> Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Jacksonian(x) -> Rhetorical(x))\nforall x (Maltese(x) and Isoclinal(x) -> Wheezy(x))\n\nIridaceous(clarice)\n\nSmoggy(clarice) and forall x (Smoggy(x) -> Jacksonian(x)) -> therefore Jacksonian(clarice) Jacksonian(clarice) and forall x (Jacksonian(x) -> Rhetorical(x)) -> therefore Rhetorical(clarice) Rhetorical(clarice) and forall x (Rhetorical(x) -> Iridaceous(x)) -> therefore Iridaceous(clarice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Felicia is not thin. Jolyn is unsounded. Ikey is thin. Joshua is not disyllabic. If Ikey is querulous then Ikey is atomistic. All thin people are disyllabic. All fleecy people are unsounded. White people are unsounded. All disyllabic people are fleecy. If someone is basipetal and atomistic then they are querulous. Ikey is not unsounded.", "logic": "\nnot Thin(felicia)\nUnsounded(jolyn)\nThin(ikey)\nnot Disyllabic(joshua)\nQuerulous(ikey) -> Atomistic(ikey)\nforall x (Thin(x) -> Disyllabic(x))\nforall x (Fleecy(x) -> Unsounded(x))\nforall x (Atomistic(x) -> Unsounded(x))\nforall x (Disyllabic(x) -> Fleecy(x))\nforall x (Basipetal(x) and Atomistic(x) -> Querulous(x))\n\nnot Unsounded(ikey)\n\nThin(ikey) and forall x (Thin(x) -> Disyllabic(x)) -> therefore Disyllabic(ikey) Disyllabic(ikey) and forall x (Disyllabic(x) -> Fleecy(x)) -> therefore Fleecy(ikey) Fleecy(ikey) and forall x (Fleecy(x) -> Unsounded(x)) -> therefore Unsounded(ikey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Smith is not dissuasive. Candis is bituminoid. Berget is dissuasive. Sherri is not simulated. If Berget is rupestral then Berget is doubtful. All dissuasive people are simulated. All stenosed people are bituminoid. White people are bituminoid. All simulated people are stenosed. If someone is lowborn and doubtful then they are rupestral. Smith is not stenosed.", "logic": "\nnot Dissuasive(smith)\nBituminoid(candis)\nDissuasive(berget)\nnot Simulated(sherri)\nRupestral(berget) -> Doubtful(berget)\nforall x (Dissuasive(x) -> Simulated(x))\nforall x (Stenosed(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Doubtful(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Stenosed(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Rupestral(x))\n\nnot Stenosed(smith)\n\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Stenosed(x)) <- forall x (Dissuasive(x) -> Simulated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Salomo is not uniovular. Thaddeus is jailed. Waite is uniovular. Gussie is not enlarged. If Waite is zealous then Waite is plaguey. All uniovular people are enlarged. All gawky people are jailed. White people are jailed. All enlarged people are gawky. If someone is sizeable and plaguey then they are zealous. Gussie is jailed.", "logic": "\nnot Uniovular(salomo)\nJailed(thaddeus)\nUniovular(waite)\nnot Enlarged(gussie)\nZealous(waite) -> Plaguey(waite)\nforall x (Uniovular(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Jailed(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) -> Jailed(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Gawky(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) and Plaguey(x) -> Zealous(x))\n\nJailed(gussie)\n\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Jailed(x)) <- forall x (Enlarged(x) -> Gawky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Marta is not mirthful. Deva is subsequent. Idell is mirthful. Johnette is not uveal. If Idell is aided then Idell is putrescent. All mirthful people are uveal. All hermetic people are subsequent. White people are subsequent. All uveal people are hermetic. If someone is unsweet and putrescent then they are aided. Idell is not putrescent.", "logic": "\nnot Mirthful(marta)\nSubsequent(deva)\nMirthful(idell)\nnot Uveal(johnette)\nAided(idell) -> Putrescent(idell)\nforall x (Mirthful(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Uveal(x) -> Hermetic(x))\nforall x (Unsweet(x) and Putrescent(x) -> Aided(x))\n\nnot Putrescent(idell)\n\nAided(idell) -> Putrescent(idell) <- forall x (Unsweet(x) and Putrescent(x) -> Aided(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Quiggly is not patronymic. Eulalie is pantheist. Inesita is patronymic. Rachael is not remote. If Inesita is outermost then Inesita is female. All patronymic people are remote. All mastoid people are pantheist. White people are pantheist. All remote people are mastoid. If someone is unsparing and female then they are outermost. Inesita is outermost.", "logic": "\nnot Patronymic(quiggly)\nPantheist(eulalie)\nPatronymic(inesita)\nnot Remote(rachael)\nOutermost(inesita) -> Female(inesita)\nforall x (Patronymic(x) -> Remote(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Female(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Remote(x) -> Mastoid(x))\nforall x (Unsparing(x) and Female(x) -> Outermost(x))\n\nOutermost(inesita)\n\nforall x (Unsparing(x) and Female(x) -> Outermost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Giavani is not knifelike. Morris is rubicund. Liora is knifelike. Wolfgang is not footed. If Liora is semisweet then Liora is corymbose. All knifelike people are footed. All lite people are rubicund. White people are rubicund. All footed people are lite. If someone is scurrilous and corymbose then they are semisweet. Giavani is not corymbose.", "logic": "\nnot Knifelike(giavani)\nRubicund(morris)\nKnifelike(liora)\nnot Footed(wolfgang)\nSemisweet(liora) -> Corymbose(liora)\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Footed(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Corymbose(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Footed(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) and Corymbose(x) -> Semisweet(x))\n\nnot Corymbose(giavani)\n\nnot Corymbose(giavani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Enrika is not snug. Toni is muddled. Ashlen is snug. Evvie is not denotative. If Ashlen is unshaped then Ashlen is outlaw. All snug people are denotative. All bounden people are muddled. White people are muddled. All denotative people are bounden. If someone is gambian and outlaw then they are unshaped. Toni is gambian.", "logic": "\nnot Snug(enrika)\nMuddled(toni)\nSnug(ashlen)\nnot Denotative(evvie)\nUnshaped(ashlen) -> Outlaw(ashlen)\nforall x (Snug(x) -> Denotative(x))\nforall x (Bounden(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Outlaw(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Denotative(x) -> Bounden(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) and Outlaw(x) -> Unshaped(x))\n\nGambian(toni)\n\nGambian(toni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Jule is not humanistic. Johnna is predatory. Morganne is humanistic. Pooh is not auriferous. If Morganne is unerring then Morganne is cyprian. All humanistic people are auriferous. All headlike people are predatory. White people are predatory. All auriferous people are headlike. If someone is unshod and cyprian then they are unerring. Pooh is not humanistic.", "logic": "\nnot Humanistic(jule)\nPredatory(johnna)\nHumanistic(morganne)\nnot Auriferous(pooh)\nUnerring(morganne) -> Cyprian(morganne)\nforall x (Humanistic(x) -> Auriferous(x))\nforall x (Headlike(x) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Headlike(x))\nforall x (Unshod(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Unerring(x))\n\nnot Humanistic(pooh)\n\nnot Humanistic(pooh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Corliss is not grubby. Griselda is porcine. Bunnie is grubby. Tiertza is not leglike. If Bunnie is robust then Bunnie is lovely. All grubby people are leglike. All verifying people are porcine. White people are porcine. All leglike people are verifying. If someone is dormy and lovely then they are robust. Corliss is dormy.", "logic": "\nnot Grubby(corliss)\nPorcine(griselda)\nGrubby(bunnie)\nnot Leglike(tiertza)\nRobust(bunnie) -> Lovely(bunnie)\nforall x (Grubby(x) -> Leglike(x))\nforall x (Verifying(x) -> Porcine(x))\nforall x (Lovely(x) -> Porcine(x))\nforall x (Leglike(x) -> Verifying(x))\nforall x (Dormy(x) and Lovely(x) -> Robust(x))\n\nDormy(corliss)\n\nDormy(corliss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Irwin is myelinic. Kellen is frizzy. Lauri is dolorous. Smart things are xxiii. If something is dolorous then it is antrorse. All xxiii things are frizzy. Kellen is frizzy.", "logic": "\nMyelinic(irwin)\nFrizzy(kellen)\nDolorous(lauri)\nforall x (Antrorse(x) -> Xxiii(x))\nforall x (Dolorous(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) -> Frizzy(x))\n\nFrizzy(kellen)\n\ntherefore Frizzy(kellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Chryste is hidrotic. Robinette is delirious. Kayla is rollicking. Smart things are submerged. If something is rollicking then it is hind. All submerged things are delirious. Chryste is not hidrotic.", "logic": "\nHidrotic(chryste)\nDelirious(robinette)\nRollicking(kayla)\nforall x (Hind(x) -> Submerged(x))\nforall x (Rollicking(x) -> Hind(x))\nforall x (Submerged(x) -> Delirious(x))\n\nnot Hidrotic(chryste)\n\ntherefore Hidrotic(chryste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Happy is unalert. Camala is barefooted. Wakefield is unpictured. Smart things are filipino. If something is unpictured then it is aperient. All filipino things are barefooted. Wakefield is aperient.", "logic": "\nUnalert(happy)\nBarefooted(camala)\nUnpictured(wakefield)\nforall x (Aperient(x) -> Filipino(x))\nforall x (Unpictured(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Filipino(x) -> Barefooted(x))\n\nAperient(wakefield)\n\nUnpictured(wakefield) and forall x (Unpictured(x) -> Aperient(x)) -> therefore Aperient(wakefield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Dari is weekly. Rhetta is unaccented. Natty is civilian. Smart things are nosed. If something is civilian then it is unswept. All nosed things are unaccented. Natty is not unswept.", "logic": "\nWeekly(dari)\nUnaccented(rhetta)\nCivilian(natty)\nforall x (Unswept(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Unaccented(x))\n\nnot Unswept(natty)\n\nCivilian(natty) and forall x (Civilian(x) -> Unswept(x)) -> therefore Unswept(natty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Janeen is welsh. Shir is humified. Amity is matchless. Smart things are mosaic. If something is matchless then it is amblyopic. All mosaic things are humified. Amity is mosaic.", "logic": "\nWelsh(janeen)\nHumified(shir)\nMatchless(amity)\nforall x (Amblyopic(x) -> Mosaic(x))\nforall x (Matchless(x) -> Amblyopic(x))\nforall x (Mosaic(x) -> Humified(x))\n\nMosaic(amity)\n\nMatchless(amity) and forall x (Matchless(x) -> Amblyopic(x)) -> therefore Amblyopic(amity) Amblyopic(amity) and forall x (Amblyopic(x) -> Mosaic(x)) -> therefore Mosaic(amity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Inge is trojan. Merl is maniacal. Amberly is centered. Smart things are intense. If something is centered then it is dependent. All intense things are maniacal. Amberly is not intense.", "logic": "\nTrojan(inge)\nManiacal(merl)\nCentered(amberly)\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Intense(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Intense(x) -> Maniacal(x))\n\nnot Intense(amberly)\n\nCentered(amberly) and forall x (Centered(x) -> Dependent(x)) -> therefore Dependent(amberly) Dependent(amberly) and forall x (Dependent(x) -> Intense(x)) -> therefore Intense(amberly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Knox is sarawakian. Eryn is fetal. Jessalyn is domestic. Smart things are untoasted. If something is domestic then it is quaggy. All untoasted things are fetal. Jessalyn is fetal.", "logic": "\nSarawakian(knox)\nFetal(eryn)\nDomestic(jessalyn)\nforall x (Quaggy(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nforall x (Domestic(x) -> Quaggy(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) -> Fetal(x))\n\nFetal(jessalyn)\n\nDomestic(jessalyn) and forall x (Domestic(x) -> Quaggy(x)) -> therefore Quaggy(jessalyn) Quaggy(jessalyn) and forall x (Quaggy(x) -> Untoasted(x)) -> therefore Untoasted(jessalyn) Untoasted(jessalyn) and forall x (Untoasted(x) -> Fetal(x)) -> therefore Fetal(jessalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Myke is neuroglial. Pate is amazed. Ilse is experient. Smart things are desiccated. If something is experient then it is eldritch. All desiccated things are amazed. Ilse is not amazed.", "logic": "\nNeuroglial(myke)\nAmazed(pate)\nExperient(ilse)\nforall x (Eldritch(x) -> Desiccated(x))\nforall x (Experient(x) -> Eldritch(x))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) -> Amazed(x))\n\nnot Amazed(ilse)\n\nExperient(ilse) and forall x (Experient(x) -> Eldritch(x)) -> therefore Eldritch(ilse) Eldritch(ilse) and forall x (Eldritch(x) -> Desiccated(x)) -> therefore Desiccated(ilse) Desiccated(ilse) and forall x (Desiccated(x) -> Amazed(x)) -> therefore Amazed(ilse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Plato is rarefied. Lotti is manic. Lucia is panicked. Smart things are starred. If something is panicked then it is fibrillose. All starred things are manic. Plato is not starred.", "logic": "\nRarefied(plato)\nManic(lotti)\nPanicked(lucia)\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Starred(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Starred(x) -> Manic(x))\n\nnot Starred(plato)\n\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Starred(x)) <- forall x (Panicked(x) -> Fibrillose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Guthry is semisweet. Jeniece is exquisite. Kristi is uxorious. Smart things are trashy. If something is uxorious then it is enzymatic. All trashy things are exquisite. Jeniece is enzymatic.", "logic": "\nSemisweet(guthry)\nExquisite(jeniece)\nUxorious(kristi)\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Trashy(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) -> Exquisite(x))\n\nEnzymatic(jeniece)\n\nforall x (Uxorious(x) -> Enzymatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Kristian is unpunished. Rutter is hyoid. Luciano is unwebbed. Smart things are atypical. If something is unwebbed then it is rocklike. All atypical things are hyoid. Kristian is not rocklike.", "logic": "\nUnpunished(kristian)\nHyoid(rutter)\nUnwebbed(luciano)\nforall x (Rocklike(x) -> Atypical(x))\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) -> Rocklike(x))\nforall x (Atypical(x) -> Hyoid(x))\n\nnot Rocklike(kristian)\n\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) -> Rocklike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Fleurette is posted. Othella is provoking. Verena is diverging. Smart things are empty. If something is diverging then it is peritoneal. All empty things are provoking. Fleurette is provoking.", "logic": "\nPosted(fleurette)\nProvoking(othella)\nDiverging(verena)\nforall x (Peritoneal(x) -> Empty(x))\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Peritoneal(x))\nforall x (Empty(x) -> Provoking(x))\n\nProvoking(fleurette)\n\nforall x (Empty(x) -> Provoking(x)) <- forall x (Peritoneal(x) -> Empty(x)) <- forall x (Diverging(x) -> Peritoneal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Erasmus is hoary. Jehanna is avian. Patrice is petaled. Smart things are unfurrowed. If something is petaled then it is anile. All unfurrowed things are avian. Erasmus is not petaled.", "logic": "\nHoary(erasmus)\nAvian(jehanna)\nPetaled(patrice)\nforall x (Anile(x) -> Unfurrowed(x))\nforall x (Petaled(x) -> Anile(x))\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Avian(x))\n\nnot Petaled(erasmus)\n\nnot Petaled(erasmus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Cassi is elaborated. Diannne is wigless. Somerset is eager. Smart things are healing. If something is eager then it is whiney. All healing things are wigless. Diannne is nice.", "logic": "\nElaborated(cassi)\nWigless(diannne)\nEager(somerset)\nforall x (Whiney(x) -> Healing(x))\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Whiney(x))\nforall x (Healing(x) -> Wigless(x))\n\nNice(diannne)\n\nNice(diannne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Jason is shrewd. Carol is decompound. Darell is blustery. Smart things are frumpish. If something is blustery then it is midweekly. All frumpish things are decompound. Jason is not round.", "logic": "\nShrewd(jason)\nDecompound(carol)\nBlustery(darell)\nforall x (Midweekly(x) -> Frumpish(x))\nforall x (Blustery(x) -> Midweekly(x))\nforall x (Frumpish(x) -> Decompound(x))\n\nnot Round(jason)\n\nnot Round(jason) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Bailey is asunder. Ruben is placed. Holly is hostile. Smart things are maritime. If something is hostile then it is uncertain. All maritime things are placed. Holly is nice.", "logic": "\nAsunder(bailey)\nPlaced(ruben)\nHostile(holly)\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Maritime(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Maritime(x) -> Placed(x))\n\nNice(holly)\n\nNice(holly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "The stillman is totemic. The finley is totemic. If someone is totemic then they eat the stillman. If someone trick the stillman then they do not eat the stillman. If someone is totemic and they do not eat the finley then they need the stillman. If someone piffle the finley and the finley trick the stillman then they do not need the finley. If someone is homelike then they do not chase the finley. If the stillman is totemic then the stillman frivol the finley. If someone is mullioned and they eat the stillman then the stillman does not chase the finley. If someone frivol the finley then the finley is homelike. The stillman is totemic.", "logic": "\nTotemic(stillman)\nTotemic(finley)\nforall x (Totemic(x) -> Piffle(x, stillman))\nforall x (Trick(x, stillman) -> not Piffle(x, stillman))\nforall x (Totemic(x) and not Piffle(x, finley) -> Frivol(x, stillman))\nforall x (Piffle(x, finley) and Trick(finley, stillman) -> not Frivol(x, finley))\nforall x (Homelike(x) -> not Trick(x, finley))\nTotemic(stillman) -> Frivol(stillman, finley)\nforall x (Mullioned(x) and Piffle(x, stillman) -> not Trick(stillman, finley))\nforall x (Frivol(x, finley) -> Homelike(finley))\n\nTotemic(stillman)\n\ntherefore Totemic(stillman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The sula is optimal. The giselle is optimal. If someone is optimal then they eat the sula. If someone enforce the sula then they do not eat the sula. If someone is optimal and they do not eat the giselle then they need the sula. If someone bill the giselle and the giselle enforce the sula then they do not need the giselle. If someone is axonal then they do not chase the giselle. If the sula is optimal then the sula handcolor the giselle. If someone is pictorial and they eat the sula then the sula does not chase the giselle. If someone handcolor the giselle then the giselle is axonal. The sula is not optimal.", "logic": "\nOptimal(sula)\nOptimal(giselle)\nforall x (Optimal(x) -> Bill(x, sula))\nforall x (Enforce(x, sula) -> not Bill(x, sula))\nforall x (Optimal(x) and not Bill(x, giselle) -> Handcolor(x, sula))\nforall x (Bill(x, giselle) and Enforce(giselle, sula) -> not Handcolor(x, giselle))\nforall x (Axonal(x) -> not Enforce(x, giselle))\nOptimal(sula) -> Handcolor(sula, giselle)\nforall x (Pictorial(x) and Bill(x, sula) -> not Enforce(sula, giselle))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, giselle) -> Axonal(giselle))\n\nnot Optimal(sula)\n\ntherefore Optimal(sula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The abigale is postmodern. The jeannette is postmodern. If someone is postmodern then they eat the abigale. If someone game the abigale then they do not eat the abigale. If someone is postmodern and they do not eat the jeannette then they need the abigale. If someone syncopate the jeannette and the jeannette game the abigale then they do not need the jeannette. If someone is binuclear then they do not chase the jeannette. If the abigale is postmodern then the abigale optimize the jeannette. If someone is overhanded and they eat the abigale then the abigale does not chase the jeannette. If someone optimize the jeannette then the jeannette is binuclear. The abigale syncopate the abigale.", "logic": "\nPostmodern(abigale)\nPostmodern(jeannette)\nforall x (Postmodern(x) -> Syncopate(x, abigale))\nforall x (Game(x, abigale) -> not Syncopate(x, abigale))\nforall x (Postmodern(x) and not Syncopate(x, jeannette) -> Optimize(x, abigale))\nforall x (Syncopate(x, jeannette) and Game(jeannette, abigale) -> not Optimize(x, jeannette))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) -> not Game(x, jeannette))\nPostmodern(abigale) -> Optimize(abigale, jeannette)\nforall x (Overhanded(x) and Syncopate(x, abigale) -> not Game(abigale, jeannette))\nforall x (Optimize(x, jeannette) -> Binuclear(jeannette))\n\nSyncopate(abigale, abigale)\n\nPostmodern(abigale) and forall x (Postmodern(x) -> Syncopate(x, abigale)) -> therefore Syncopate(abigale, abigale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The sonnie is delusional. The tova is delusional. If someone is delusional then they eat the sonnie. If someone burst the sonnie then they do not eat the sonnie. If someone is delusional and they do not eat the tova then they need the sonnie. If someone overcrop the tova and the tova burst the sonnie then they do not need the tova. If someone is ichorous then they do not chase the tova. If the sonnie is delusional then the sonnie bespeckle the tova. If someone is seamanly and they eat the sonnie then the sonnie does not chase the tova. If someone bespeckle the tova then the tova is ichorous. The sonnie does not need the tova.", "logic": "\nDelusional(sonnie)\nDelusional(tova)\nforall x (Delusional(x) -> Overcrop(x, sonnie))\nforall x (Burst(x, sonnie) -> not Overcrop(x, sonnie))\nforall x (Delusional(x) and not Overcrop(x, tova) -> Bespeckle(x, sonnie))\nforall x (Overcrop(x, tova) and Burst(tova, sonnie) -> not Bespeckle(x, tova))\nforall x (Ichorous(x) -> not Burst(x, tova))\nDelusional(sonnie) -> Bespeckle(sonnie, tova)\nforall x (Seamanly(x) and Overcrop(x, sonnie) -> not Burst(sonnie, tova))\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, tova) -> Ichorous(tova))\n\nnot Bespeckle(sonnie, tova)\n\nDelusional(sonnie) and Delusional(sonnie) -> Bespeckle(sonnie, tova) -> therefore Bespeckle(sonnie, tova)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The griselda is mechanised. The eliott is mechanised. If someone is mechanised then they eat the griselda. If someone howl the griselda then they do not eat the griselda. If someone is mechanised and they do not eat the eliott then they need the griselda. If someone moralise the eliott and the eliott howl the griselda then they do not need the eliott. If someone is absorbent then they do not chase the eliott. If the griselda is mechanised then the griselda manumit the eliott. If someone is faint and they eat the griselda then the griselda does not chase the eliott. If someone manumit the eliott then the eliott is absorbent. The eliott is absorbent.", "logic": "\nMechanised(griselda)\nMechanised(eliott)\nforall x (Mechanised(x) -> Moralise(x, griselda))\nforall x (Howl(x, griselda) -> not Moralise(x, griselda))\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and not Moralise(x, eliott) -> Manumit(x, griselda))\nforall x (Moralise(x, eliott) and Howl(eliott, griselda) -> not Manumit(x, eliott))\nforall x (Absorbent(x) -> not Howl(x, eliott))\nMechanised(griselda) -> Manumit(griselda, eliott)\nforall x (Faint(x) and Moralise(x, griselda) -> not Howl(griselda, eliott))\nforall x (Manumit(x, eliott) -> Absorbent(eliott))\n\nAbsorbent(eliott)\n\nMechanised(griselda) and Mechanised(griselda) -> Manumit(griselda, eliott) -> therefore Manumit(griselda, eliott) Manumit(griselda, eliott) and forall x (Manumit(x, eliott) -> Absorbent(eliott)) -> therefore Absorbent(eliott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The dickie is succinic. The lori is succinic. If someone is succinic then they eat the dickie. If someone film the dickie then they do not eat the dickie. If someone is succinic and they do not eat the lori then they need the dickie. If someone bonk the lori and the lori film the dickie then they do not need the lori. If someone is armoured then they do not chase the lori. If the dickie is succinic then the dickie charge the lori. If someone is sadistic and they eat the dickie then the dickie does not chase the lori. If someone charge the lori then the lori is armoured. The lori is not armoured.", "logic": "\nSuccinic(dickie)\nSuccinic(lori)\nforall x (Succinic(x) -> Bonk(x, dickie))\nforall x (Film(x, dickie) -> not Bonk(x, dickie))\nforall x (Succinic(x) and not Bonk(x, lori) -> Charge(x, dickie))\nforall x (Bonk(x, lori) and Film(lori, dickie) -> not Charge(x, lori))\nforall x (Armoured(x) -> not Film(x, lori))\nSuccinic(dickie) -> Charge(dickie, lori)\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Bonk(x, dickie) -> not Film(dickie, lori))\nforall x (Charge(x, lori) -> Armoured(lori))\n\nnot Armoured(lori)\n\nSuccinic(dickie) and Succinic(dickie) -> Charge(dickie, lori) -> therefore Charge(dickie, lori) Charge(dickie, lori) and forall x (Charge(x, lori) -> Armoured(lori)) -> therefore Armoured(lori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The aurea is decreed. The richy is decreed. If someone is decreed then they eat the aurea. If someone spiritise the aurea then they do not eat the aurea. If someone is decreed and they do not eat the richy then they need the aurea. If someone collide the richy and the richy spiritise the aurea then they do not need the richy. If someone is filariid then they do not chase the richy. If the aurea is decreed then the aurea miscreate the richy. If someone is split and they eat the aurea then the aurea does not chase the richy. If someone miscreate the richy then the richy is filariid. The richy does not chase the richy.", "logic": "\nDecreed(aurea)\nDecreed(richy)\nforall x (Decreed(x) -> Collide(x, aurea))\nforall x (Spiritise(x, aurea) -> not Collide(x, aurea))\nforall x (Decreed(x) and not Collide(x, richy) -> Miscreate(x, aurea))\nforall x (Collide(x, richy) and Spiritise(richy, aurea) -> not Miscreate(x, richy))\nforall x (Filariid(x) -> not Spiritise(x, richy))\nDecreed(aurea) -> Miscreate(aurea, richy)\nforall x (Split(x) and Collide(x, aurea) -> not Spiritise(aurea, richy))\nforall x (Miscreate(x, richy) -> Filariid(richy))\n\nnot Spiritise(richy, richy)\n\nDecreed(aurea) and Decreed(aurea) -> Miscreate(aurea, richy) -> therefore Miscreate(aurea, richy) Miscreate(aurea, richy) and forall x (Miscreate(x, richy) -> Filariid(richy)) -> therefore Filariid(richy) Filariid(richy) and forall x (Filariid(x) -> not Spiritise(x, richy)) -> therefore not Spiritise(richy, richy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The erhart is unasked. The lorry is unasked. If someone is unasked then they eat the erhart. If someone unveil the erhart then they do not eat the erhart. If someone is unasked and they do not eat the lorry then they need the erhart. If someone syncopate the lorry and the lorry unveil the erhart then they do not need the lorry. If someone is taupe then they do not chase the lorry. If the erhart is unasked then the erhart sulk the lorry. If someone is neapolitan and they eat the erhart then the erhart does not chase the lorry. If someone sulk the lorry then the lorry is taupe. The lorry unveil the lorry.", "logic": "\nUnasked(erhart)\nUnasked(lorry)\nforall x (Unasked(x) -> Syncopate(x, erhart))\nforall x (Unveil(x, erhart) -> not Syncopate(x, erhart))\nforall x (Unasked(x) and not Syncopate(x, lorry) -> Sulk(x, erhart))\nforall x (Syncopate(x, lorry) and Unveil(lorry, erhart) -> not Sulk(x, lorry))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> not Unveil(x, lorry))\nUnasked(erhart) -> Sulk(erhart, lorry)\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) and Syncopate(x, erhart) -> not Unveil(erhart, lorry))\nforall x (Sulk(x, lorry) -> Taupe(lorry))\n\nUnveil(lorry, lorry)\n\nUnasked(erhart) and Unasked(erhart) -> Sulk(erhart, lorry) -> therefore Sulk(erhart, lorry) Sulk(erhart, lorry) and forall x (Sulk(x, lorry) -> Taupe(lorry)) -> therefore Taupe(lorry) Taupe(lorry) and forall x (Taupe(x) -> not Unveil(x, lorry)) -> therefore not Unveil(lorry, lorry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The lucienne is brotherly. The jessika is brotherly. If someone is brotherly then they eat the lucienne. If someone nullify the lucienne then they do not eat the lucienne. If someone is brotherly and they do not eat the jessika then they need the lucienne. If someone finish the jessika and the jessika nullify the lucienne then they do not need the jessika. If someone is acquirable then they do not chase the jessika. If the lucienne is brotherly then the lucienne pock the jessika. If someone is unclad and they eat the lucienne then the lucienne does not chase the jessika. If someone pock the jessika then the jessika is acquirable. The jessika does not need the lucienne.", "logic": "\nBrotherly(lucienne)\nBrotherly(jessika)\nforall x (Brotherly(x) -> Finish(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Nullify(x, lucienne) -> not Finish(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and not Finish(x, jessika) -> Pock(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Finish(x, jessika) and Nullify(jessika, lucienne) -> not Pock(x, jessika))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) -> not Nullify(x, jessika))\nBrotherly(lucienne) -> Pock(lucienne, jessika)\nforall x (Unclad(x) and Finish(x, lucienne) -> not Nullify(lucienne, jessika))\nforall x (Pock(x, jessika) -> Acquirable(jessika))\n\nnot Pock(jessika, lucienne)\n\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and not Finish(x, jessika) -> Pock(x, lucienne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The merrili is ventricous. The benton is ventricous. If someone is ventricous then they eat the merrili. If someone vaunt the merrili then they do not eat the merrili. If someone is ventricous and they do not eat the benton then they need the merrili. If someone rubber the benton and the benton vaunt the merrili then they do not need the benton. If someone is compulsory then they do not chase the benton. If the merrili is ventricous then the merrili flame the benton. If someone is aeolian and they eat the merrili then the merrili does not chase the benton. If someone flame the benton then the benton is compulsory. The merrili flame the merrili.", "logic": "\nVentricous(merrili)\nVentricous(benton)\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> Rubber(x, merrili))\nforall x (Vaunt(x, merrili) -> not Rubber(x, merrili))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and not Rubber(x, benton) -> Flame(x, merrili))\nforall x (Rubber(x, benton) and Vaunt(benton, merrili) -> not Flame(x, benton))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> not Vaunt(x, benton))\nVentricous(merrili) -> Flame(merrili, benton)\nforall x (Aeolian(x) and Rubber(x, merrili) -> not Vaunt(merrili, benton))\nforall x (Flame(x, benton) -> Compulsory(benton))\n\nFlame(merrili, merrili)\n\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and not Rubber(x, benton) -> Flame(x, merrili)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The raf is tonguelike. The manny is tonguelike. If someone is tonguelike then they eat the raf. If someone comprehend the raf then they do not eat the raf. If someone is tonguelike and they do not eat the manny then they need the raf. If someone embrocate the manny and the manny comprehend the raf then they do not need the manny. If someone is slight then they do not chase the manny. If the raf is tonguelike then the raf summerize the manny. If someone is mastoidal and they eat the raf then the raf does not chase the manny. If someone summerize the manny then the manny is slight. The manny is not mastoidal.", "logic": "\nTonguelike(raf)\nTonguelike(manny)\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Embrocate(x, raf))\nforall x (Comprehend(x, raf) -> not Embrocate(x, raf))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) and not Embrocate(x, manny) -> Summerize(x, raf))\nforall x (Embrocate(x, manny) and Comprehend(manny, raf) -> not Summerize(x, manny))\nforall x (Slight(x) -> not Comprehend(x, manny))\nTonguelike(raf) -> Summerize(raf, manny)\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) and Embrocate(x, raf) -> not Comprehend(raf, manny))\nforall x (Summerize(x, manny) -> Slight(manny))\n\nnot Mastoidal(manny)\n\nnot Mastoidal(manny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The breena is nettlesome. The randell is nettlesome. If someone is nettlesome then they eat the breena. If someone rethink the breena then they do not eat the breena. If someone is nettlesome and they do not eat the randell then they need the breena. If someone grunt the randell and the randell rethink the breena then they do not need the randell. If someone is palatal then they do not chase the randell. If the breena is nettlesome then the breena crenellate the randell. If someone is vicarial and they eat the breena then the breena does not chase the randell. If someone crenellate the randell then the randell is palatal. The breena is round.", "logic": "\nNettlesome(breena)\nNettlesome(randell)\nforall x (Nettlesome(x) -> Grunt(x, breena))\nforall x (Rethink(x, breena) -> not Grunt(x, breena))\nforall x (Nettlesome(x) and not Grunt(x, randell) -> Crenellate(x, breena))\nforall x (Grunt(x, randell) and Rethink(randell, breena) -> not Crenellate(x, randell))\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> not Rethink(x, randell))\nNettlesome(breena) -> Crenellate(breena, randell)\nforall x (Vicarial(x) and Grunt(x, breena) -> not Rethink(breena, randell))\nforall x (Crenellate(x, randell) -> Palatal(randell))\n\nRound(breena)\n\nRound(breena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The chere is smoky. The silvano is smoky. If someone is smoky then they eat the chere. If someone stabilize the chere then they do not eat the chere. If someone is smoky and they do not eat the silvano then they need the chere. If someone galumph the silvano and the silvano stabilize the chere then they do not need the silvano. If someone is coexisting then they do not chase the silvano. If the chere is smoky then the chere itemize the silvano. If someone is unengaged and they eat the chere then the chere does not chase the silvano. If someone itemize the silvano then the silvano is coexisting. The silvano is not round.", "logic": "\nSmoky(chere)\nSmoky(silvano)\nforall x (Smoky(x) -> Galumph(x, chere))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, chere) -> not Galumph(x, chere))\nforall x (Smoky(x) and not Galumph(x, silvano) -> Itemize(x, chere))\nforall x (Galumph(x, silvano) and Stabilize(silvano, chere) -> not Itemize(x, silvano))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) -> not Stabilize(x, silvano))\nSmoky(chere) -> Itemize(chere, silvano)\nforall x (Unengaged(x) and Galumph(x, chere) -> not Stabilize(chere, silvano))\nforall x (Itemize(x, silvano) -> Coexisting(silvano))\n\nnot Round(silvano)\n\nnot Round(silvano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The elfrida is covetous. The murray is covetous. If someone is covetous then they eat the elfrida. If someone download the elfrida then they do not eat the elfrida. If someone is covetous and they do not eat the murray then they need the elfrida. If someone reap the murray and the murray download the elfrida then they do not need the murray. If someone is bichrome then they do not chase the murray. If the elfrida is covetous then the elfrida bereave the murray. If someone is smothering and they eat the elfrida then the elfrida does not chase the murray. If someone bereave the murray then the murray is bichrome. The elfrida is bichrome.", "logic": "\nCovetous(elfrida)\nCovetous(murray)\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> Reap(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Download(x, elfrida) -> not Reap(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Covetous(x) and not Reap(x, murray) -> Bereave(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Reap(x, murray) and Download(murray, elfrida) -> not Bereave(x, murray))\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> not Download(x, murray))\nCovetous(elfrida) -> Bereave(elfrida, murray)\nforall x (Smothering(x) and Reap(x, elfrida) -> not Download(elfrida, murray))\nforall x (Bereave(x, murray) -> Bichrome(murray))\n\nBichrome(elfrida)\n\nBichrome(elfrida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The kim is catacorner. The phyllida is catacorner. If someone is catacorner then they eat the kim. If someone shill the kim then they do not eat the kim. If someone is catacorner and they do not eat the phyllida then they need the kim. If someone deliquesce the phyllida and the phyllida shill the kim then they do not need the phyllida. If someone is rotated then they do not chase the phyllida. If the kim is catacorner then the kim centralise the phyllida. If someone is plane and they eat the kim then the kim does not chase the phyllida. If someone centralise the phyllida then the phyllida is rotated. The kim does not chase the phyllida.", "logic": "\nCatacorner(kim)\nCatacorner(phyllida)\nforall x (Catacorner(x) -> Deliquesce(x, kim))\nforall x (Shill(x, kim) -> not Deliquesce(x, kim))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) and not Deliquesce(x, phyllida) -> Centralise(x, kim))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, phyllida) and Shill(phyllida, kim) -> not Centralise(x, phyllida))\nforall x (Rotated(x) -> not Shill(x, phyllida))\nCatacorner(kim) -> Centralise(kim, phyllida)\nforall x (Plane(x) and Deliquesce(x, kim) -> not Shill(kim, phyllida))\nforall x (Centralise(x, phyllida) -> Rotated(phyllida))\n\nnot Shill(kim, phyllida)\n\nnot Shill(kim, phyllida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The shawna is fruitless. The rasia is fruitless. If someone is fruitless then they eat the shawna. If someone swinge the shawna then they do not eat the shawna. If someone is fruitless and they do not eat the rasia then they need the shawna. If someone respire the rasia and the rasia swinge the shawna then they do not need the rasia. If someone is standpat then they do not chase the rasia. If the shawna is fruitless then the shawna bemoan the rasia. If someone is premedical and they eat the shawna then the shawna does not chase the rasia. If someone bemoan the rasia then the rasia is standpat. The rasia swinge the shawna.", "logic": "\nFruitless(shawna)\nFruitless(rasia)\nforall x (Fruitless(x) -> Respire(x, shawna))\nforall x (Swinge(x, shawna) -> not Respire(x, shawna))\nforall x (Fruitless(x) and not Respire(x, rasia) -> Bemoan(x, shawna))\nforall x (Respire(x, rasia) and Swinge(rasia, shawna) -> not Bemoan(x, rasia))\nforall x (Standpat(x) -> not Swinge(x, rasia))\nFruitless(shawna) -> Bemoan(shawna, rasia)\nforall x (Premedical(x) and Respire(x, shawna) -> not Swinge(shawna, rasia))\nforall x (Bemoan(x, rasia) -> Standpat(rasia))\n\nSwinge(rasia, shawna)\n\nSwinge(rasia, shawna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "Leonie is dicey. Leonie is spoiled. Leonie is enviable. Leonie is impacted. Leonie is withering. Leonie is divided. Leonie is interlaced. Saraann is dicey. Saraann is spoiled. Saraann is enviable. Saraann is impacted. Saraann is withering. Saraann is divided. Saraann is interlaced. Jenine is enviable. Jenine is impacted. If someone is divided and spoiled then they are impacted. If someone is divided then they are interlaced. All divided, withering people are enviable. Young people are impacted. Kind people are divided. All interlaced, divided people are spoiled. Saraann is divided.", "logic": "\nDicey(leonie)\nSpoiled(leonie)\nEnviable(leonie)\nImpacted(leonie)\nWithering(leonie)\nDivided(leonie)\nInterlaced(leonie)\nDicey(saraann)\nSpoiled(saraann)\nEnviable(saraann)\nImpacted(saraann)\nWithering(saraann)\nDivided(saraann)\nInterlaced(saraann)\nEnviable(jenine)\nImpacted(jenine)\nforall x (Divided(x) and Spoiled(x) -> Impacted(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Interlaced(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Withering(x) -> Enviable(x))\nforall x (Interlaced(x) -> Impacted(x))\nforall x (Impacted(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Interlaced(x) and Divided(x) -> Spoiled(x))\n\nDivided(saraann)\n\ntherefore Divided(saraann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Ranice is diabolical. Ranice is lawless. Ranice is stranded. Ranice is insistent. Ranice is warning. Ranice is accessory. Ranice is tsaristic. Orelie is diabolical. Orelie is lawless. Orelie is stranded. Orelie is insistent. Orelie is warning. Orelie is accessory. Orelie is tsaristic. Isaiah is stranded. Isaiah is insistent. If someone is accessory and lawless then they are insistent. If someone is accessory then they are tsaristic. All accessory, warning people are stranded. Young people are insistent. Kind people are accessory. All tsaristic, accessory people are lawless. Orelie is not lawless.", "logic": "\nDiabolical(ranice)\nLawless(ranice)\nStranded(ranice)\nInsistent(ranice)\nWarning(ranice)\nAccessory(ranice)\nTsaristic(ranice)\nDiabolical(orelie)\nLawless(orelie)\nStranded(orelie)\nInsistent(orelie)\nWarning(orelie)\nAccessory(orelie)\nTsaristic(orelie)\nStranded(isaiah)\nInsistent(isaiah)\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Lawless(x) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) -> Tsaristic(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Warning(x) -> Stranded(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) -> Accessory(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and Accessory(x) -> Lawless(x))\n\nnot Lawless(orelie)\n\ntherefore Lawless(orelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Marni is annoyed. Marni is isolable. Marni is osmotic. Marni is dynastic. Marni is felted. Marni is combative. Marni is saleable. Amandie is annoyed. Amandie is isolable. Amandie is osmotic. Amandie is dynastic. Amandie is felted. Amandie is combative. Amandie is saleable. Dru is osmotic. Dru is dynastic. If someone is combative and isolable then they are dynastic. If someone is combative then they are saleable. All combative, felted people are osmotic. Young people are dynastic. Kind people are combative. All saleable, combative people are isolable. Dru is combative.", "logic": "\nAnnoyed(marni)\nIsolable(marni)\nOsmotic(marni)\nDynastic(marni)\nFelted(marni)\nCombative(marni)\nSaleable(marni)\nAnnoyed(amandie)\nIsolable(amandie)\nOsmotic(amandie)\nDynastic(amandie)\nFelted(amandie)\nCombative(amandie)\nSaleable(amandie)\nOsmotic(dru)\nDynastic(dru)\nforall x (Combative(x) and Isolable(x) -> Dynastic(x))\nforall x (Combative(x) -> Saleable(x))\nforall x (Combative(x) and Felted(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Saleable(x) -> Dynastic(x))\nforall x (Dynastic(x) -> Combative(x))\nforall x (Saleable(x) and Combative(x) -> Isolable(x))\n\nCombative(dru)\n\nDynastic(dru) and forall x (Dynastic(x) -> Combative(x)) -> therefore Combative(dru)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Emerson is uppercase. Emerson is skanky. Emerson is blustery. Emerson is demagogic. Emerson is wounded. Emerson is shielded. Emerson is hangdog. Melloney is uppercase. Melloney is skanky. Melloney is blustery. Melloney is demagogic. Melloney is wounded. Melloney is shielded. Melloney is hangdog. Sybille is blustery. Sybille is demagogic. If someone is shielded and skanky then they are demagogic. If someone is shielded then they are hangdog. All shielded, wounded people are blustery. Young people are demagogic. Kind people are shielded. All hangdog, shielded people are skanky. Sybille is not shielded.", "logic": "\nUppercase(emerson)\nSkanky(emerson)\nBlustery(emerson)\nDemagogic(emerson)\nWounded(emerson)\nShielded(emerson)\nHangdog(emerson)\nUppercase(melloney)\nSkanky(melloney)\nBlustery(melloney)\nDemagogic(melloney)\nWounded(melloney)\nShielded(melloney)\nHangdog(melloney)\nBlustery(sybille)\nDemagogic(sybille)\nforall x (Shielded(x) and Skanky(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Shielded(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Shielded(x) and Wounded(x) -> Blustery(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Shielded(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) and Shielded(x) -> Skanky(x))\n\nnot Shielded(sybille)\n\nDemagogic(sybille) and forall x (Demagogic(x) -> Shielded(x)) -> therefore Shielded(sybille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Winna is isogonic. Winna is cleanly. Winna is evidential. Winna is full. Winna is eristical. Winna is adolescent. Winna is enolic. Ginelle is isogonic. Ginelle is cleanly. Ginelle is evidential. Ginelle is full. Ginelle is eristical. Ginelle is adolescent. Ginelle is enolic. Elsi is evidential. Elsi is full. If someone is adolescent and cleanly then they are full. If someone is adolescent then they are enolic. All adolescent, eristical people are evidential. Young people are full. Kind people are adolescent. All enolic, adolescent people are cleanly. Elsi is enolic.", "logic": "\nIsogonic(winna)\nCleanly(winna)\nEvidential(winna)\nFull(winna)\nEristical(winna)\nAdolescent(winna)\nEnolic(winna)\nIsogonic(ginelle)\nCleanly(ginelle)\nEvidential(ginelle)\nFull(ginelle)\nEristical(ginelle)\nAdolescent(ginelle)\nEnolic(ginelle)\nEvidential(elsi)\nFull(elsi)\nforall x (Adolescent(x) and Cleanly(x) -> Full(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) -> Enolic(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) and Eristical(x) -> Evidential(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) -> Full(x))\nforall x (Full(x) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Adolescent(x) -> Cleanly(x))\n\nEnolic(elsi)\n\nFull(elsi) and forall x (Full(x) -> Adolescent(x)) -> therefore Adolescent(elsi) Adolescent(elsi) and forall x (Adolescent(x) -> Enolic(x)) -> therefore Enolic(elsi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Endora is funereal. Endora is flukey. Endora is moonlike. Endora is defendable. Endora is cheliceral. Endora is unsaleable. Endora is liquescent. Magna is funereal. Magna is flukey. Magna is moonlike. Magna is defendable. Magna is cheliceral. Magna is unsaleable. Magna is liquescent. Jared is moonlike. Jared is defendable. If someone is unsaleable and flukey then they are defendable. If someone is unsaleable then they are liquescent. All unsaleable, cheliceral people are moonlike. Young people are defendable. Kind people are unsaleable. All liquescent, unsaleable people are flukey. Jared is not liquescent.", "logic": "\nFunereal(endora)\nFlukey(endora)\nMoonlike(endora)\nDefendable(endora)\nCheliceral(endora)\nUnsaleable(endora)\nLiquescent(endora)\nFunereal(magna)\nFlukey(magna)\nMoonlike(magna)\nDefendable(magna)\nCheliceral(magna)\nUnsaleable(magna)\nLiquescent(magna)\nMoonlike(jared)\nDefendable(jared)\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) and Flukey(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) and Cheliceral(x) -> Moonlike(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Defendable(x) -> Unsaleable(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) and Unsaleable(x) -> Flukey(x))\n\nnot Liquescent(jared)\n\nDefendable(jared) and forall x (Defendable(x) -> Unsaleable(x)) -> therefore Unsaleable(jared) Unsaleable(jared) and forall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Liquescent(x)) -> therefore Liquescent(jared)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Aron is scrupulous. Aron is hanoverian. Aron is downfield. Aron is conductive. Aron is owlish. Aron is unscripted. Aron is lame. Clifford is scrupulous. Clifford is hanoverian. Clifford is downfield. Clifford is conductive. Clifford is owlish. Clifford is unscripted. Clifford is lame. Jeanine is downfield. Jeanine is conductive. If someone is unscripted and hanoverian then they are conductive. If someone is unscripted then they are lame. All unscripted, owlish people are downfield. Young people are conductive. Kind people are unscripted. All lame, unscripted people are hanoverian. Jeanine is hanoverian.", "logic": "\nScrupulous(aron)\nHanoverian(aron)\nDownfield(aron)\nConductive(aron)\nOwlish(aron)\nUnscripted(aron)\nLame(aron)\nScrupulous(clifford)\nHanoverian(clifford)\nDownfield(clifford)\nConductive(clifford)\nOwlish(clifford)\nUnscripted(clifford)\nLame(clifford)\nDownfield(jeanine)\nConductive(jeanine)\nforall x (Unscripted(x) and Hanoverian(x) -> Conductive(x))\nforall x (Unscripted(x) -> Lame(x))\nforall x (Unscripted(x) and Owlish(x) -> Downfield(x))\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Conductive(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) -> Unscripted(x))\nforall x (Lame(x) and Unscripted(x) -> Hanoverian(x))\n\nHanoverian(jeanine)\n\nConductive(jeanine) and forall x (Conductive(x) -> Unscripted(x)) -> therefore Unscripted(jeanine) Unscripted(jeanine) and forall x (Unscripted(x) -> Lame(x)) -> therefore Lame(jeanine) Conductive(jeanine) and forall x (Conductive(x) -> Unscripted(x)) -> therefore Unscripted(jeanine) Lame(jeanine) and Unscripted(jeanine) and forall x (Lame(x) and Unscripted(x) -> Hanoverian(x)) -> therefore Hanoverian(jeanine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Cortney is motorial. Cortney is definable. Cortney is snaky. Cortney is ulnar. Cortney is harmonized. Cortney is casebook. Cortney is preventive. Leon is motorial. Leon is definable. Leon is snaky. Leon is ulnar. Leon is harmonized. Leon is casebook. Leon is preventive. Maegan is snaky. Maegan is ulnar. If someone is casebook and definable then they are ulnar. If someone is casebook then they are preventive. All casebook, harmonized people are snaky. Young people are ulnar. Kind people are casebook. All preventive, casebook people are definable. Maegan is not definable.", "logic": "\nMotorial(cortney)\nDefinable(cortney)\nSnaky(cortney)\nUlnar(cortney)\nHarmonized(cortney)\nCasebook(cortney)\nPreventive(cortney)\nMotorial(leon)\nDefinable(leon)\nSnaky(leon)\nUlnar(leon)\nHarmonized(leon)\nCasebook(leon)\nPreventive(leon)\nSnaky(maegan)\nUlnar(maegan)\nforall x (Casebook(x) and Definable(x) -> Ulnar(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) -> Preventive(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Snaky(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> Ulnar(x))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Casebook(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) and Casebook(x) -> Definable(x))\n\nnot Definable(maegan)\n\nUlnar(maegan) and forall x (Ulnar(x) -> Casebook(x)) -> therefore Casebook(maegan) Casebook(maegan) and forall x (Casebook(x) -> Preventive(x)) -> therefore Preventive(maegan) Ulnar(maegan) and forall x (Ulnar(x) -> Casebook(x)) -> therefore Casebook(maegan) Preventive(maegan) and Casebook(maegan) and forall x (Preventive(x) and Casebook(x) -> Definable(x)) -> therefore Definable(maegan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Sheffield is punic. Sheffield is bigger. Sheffield is baseless. Sheffield is acanthotic. Sheffield is alloyed. Sheffield is unlamented. Sheffield is taciturn. Orion is punic. Orion is bigger. Orion is baseless. Orion is acanthotic. Orion is alloyed. Orion is unlamented. Orion is taciturn. Nyssa is baseless. Nyssa is acanthotic. If someone is unlamented and bigger then they are acanthotic. If someone is unlamented then they are taciturn. All unlamented, alloyed people are baseless. Young people are acanthotic. Kind people are unlamented. All taciturn, unlamented people are bigger. Nyssa is not punic.", "logic": "\nPunic(sheffield)\nBigger(sheffield)\nBaseless(sheffield)\nAcanthotic(sheffield)\nAlloyed(sheffield)\nUnlamented(sheffield)\nTaciturn(sheffield)\nPunic(orion)\nBigger(orion)\nBaseless(orion)\nAcanthotic(orion)\nAlloyed(orion)\nUnlamented(orion)\nTaciturn(orion)\nBaseless(nyssa)\nAcanthotic(nyssa)\nforall x (Unlamented(x) and Bigger(x) -> Acanthotic(x))\nforall x (Unlamented(x) -> Taciturn(x))\nforall x (Unlamented(x) and Alloyed(x) -> Baseless(x))\nforall x (Taciturn(x) -> Acanthotic(x))\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) -> Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Taciturn(x) and Unlamented(x) -> Bigger(x))\n\nnot Punic(nyssa)\n\nnot Punic(nyssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Giffard is dizzy. Giffard is classless. Giffard is skintight. Giffard is ethiopian. Giffard is cultivated. Giffard is trivial. Giffard is crapulous. Alexina is dizzy. Alexina is classless. Alexina is skintight. Alexina is ethiopian. Alexina is cultivated. Alexina is trivial. Alexina is crapulous. Donetta is skintight. Donetta is ethiopian. If someone is trivial and classless then they are ethiopian. If someone is trivial then they are crapulous. All trivial, cultivated people are skintight. Young people are ethiopian. Kind people are trivial. All crapulous, trivial people are classless. Donetta is cultivated.", "logic": "\nDizzy(giffard)\nClassless(giffard)\nSkintight(giffard)\nEthiopian(giffard)\nCultivated(giffard)\nTrivial(giffard)\nCrapulous(giffard)\nDizzy(alexina)\nClassless(alexina)\nSkintight(alexina)\nEthiopian(alexina)\nCultivated(alexina)\nTrivial(alexina)\nCrapulous(alexina)\nSkintight(donetta)\nEthiopian(donetta)\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Classless(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) -> Crapulous(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Skintight(x))\nforall x (Crapulous(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Trivial(x))\nforall x (Crapulous(x) and Trivial(x) -> Classless(x))\n\nCultivated(donetta)\n\nCultivated(donetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Mohammed is unveiled. Mohammed is emended. Mohammed is vacant. Jenine is principal. Jenine is busted. Jenine is unveiled. Jenine is vacant. If something is latino then it is asexual. If something is latino and unveiled then it is vacant. Round things are busted. If Mohammed is asexual and Mohammed is principal then Mohammed is vacant. If something is emended then it is latino. If Jenine is asexual then Jenine is busted. Mohammed is vacant.", "logic": "\nUnveiled(mohammed)\nEmended(mohammed)\nVacant(mohammed)\nPrincipal(jenine)\nBusted(jenine)\nUnveiled(jenine)\nVacant(jenine)\nforall x (Latino(x) -> Asexual(x))\nforall x (Latino(x) and Unveiled(x) -> Vacant(x))\nforall x (Asexual(x) -> Busted(x))\nAsexual(mohammed) and Principal(mohammed) -> Vacant(mohammed)\nforall x (Emended(x) -> Latino(x))\nAsexual(jenine) -> Busted(jenine)\n\nVacant(mohammed)\n\ntherefore Vacant(mohammed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Ardeen is satirical. Ardeen is total. Ardeen is ironed. Jack is existing. Jack is liii. Jack is satirical. Jack is ironed. If something is uncombable then it is uncleanly. If something is uncombable and satirical then it is ironed. Round things are liii. If Ardeen is uncleanly and Ardeen is existing then Ardeen is ironed. If something is total then it is uncombable. If Jack is uncleanly then Jack is liii. Jack is not ironed.", "logic": "\nSatirical(ardeen)\nTotal(ardeen)\nIroned(ardeen)\nExisting(jack)\nLiii(jack)\nSatirical(jack)\nIroned(jack)\nforall x (Uncombable(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\nforall x (Uncombable(x) and Satirical(x) -> Ironed(x))\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) -> Liii(x))\nUncleanly(ardeen) and Existing(ardeen) -> Ironed(ardeen)\nforall x (Total(x) -> Uncombable(x))\nUncleanly(jack) -> Liii(jack)\n\nnot Ironed(jack)\n\ntherefore Ironed(jack)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Zach is neutral. Zach is ended. Zach is acanthous. Morgana is lxviii. Morgana is aguish. Morgana is neutral. Morgana is acanthous. If something is sadistic then it is formative. If something is sadistic and neutral then it is acanthous. Round things are aguish. If Zach is formative and Zach is lxviii then Zach is acanthous. If something is ended then it is sadistic. If Morgana is formative then Morgana is aguish. Zach is sadistic.", "logic": "\nNeutral(zach)\nEnded(zach)\nAcanthous(zach)\nLxviii(morgana)\nAguish(morgana)\nNeutral(morgana)\nAcanthous(morgana)\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> Formative(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Neutral(x) -> Acanthous(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) -> Aguish(x))\nFormative(zach) and Lxviii(zach) -> Acanthous(zach)\nforall x (Ended(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nFormative(morgana) -> Aguish(morgana)\n\nSadistic(zach)\n\nEnded(zach) and forall x (Ended(x) -> Sadistic(x)) -> therefore Sadistic(zach)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Levi is aroid. Levi is terse. Levi is unsexy. Mamie is audacious. Mamie is sarcastic. Mamie is aroid. Mamie is unsexy. If something is newborn then it is terrible. If something is newborn and aroid then it is unsexy. Round things are sarcastic. If Levi is terrible and Levi is audacious then Levi is unsexy. If something is terse then it is newborn. If Mamie is terrible then Mamie is sarcastic. Levi is not newborn.", "logic": "\nAroid(levi)\nTerse(levi)\nUnsexy(levi)\nAudacious(mamie)\nSarcastic(mamie)\nAroid(mamie)\nUnsexy(mamie)\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Terrible(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) and Aroid(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Terrible(x) -> Sarcastic(x))\nTerrible(levi) and Audacious(levi) -> Unsexy(levi)\nforall x (Terse(x) -> Newborn(x))\nTerrible(mamie) -> Sarcastic(mamie)\n\nnot Newborn(levi)\n\nTerse(levi) and forall x (Terse(x) -> Newborn(x)) -> therefore Newborn(levi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Gonzales is highborn. Gonzales is rapid. Gonzales is tannish. Elsie is jural. Elsie is catarrhine. Elsie is highborn. Elsie is tannish. If something is bituminous then it is hebdomadal. If something is bituminous and highborn then it is tannish. Round things are catarrhine. If Gonzales is hebdomadal and Gonzales is jural then Gonzales is tannish. If something is rapid then it is bituminous. If Elsie is hebdomadal then Elsie is catarrhine. Gonzales is hebdomadal.", "logic": "\nHighborn(gonzales)\nRapid(gonzales)\nTannish(gonzales)\nJural(elsie)\nCatarrhine(elsie)\nHighborn(elsie)\nTannish(elsie)\nforall x (Bituminous(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Bituminous(x) and Highborn(x) -> Tannish(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nHebdomadal(gonzales) and Jural(gonzales) -> Tannish(gonzales)\nforall x (Rapid(x) -> Bituminous(x))\nHebdomadal(elsie) -> Catarrhine(elsie)\n\nHebdomadal(gonzales)\n\nRapid(gonzales) and forall x (Rapid(x) -> Bituminous(x)) -> therefore Bituminous(gonzales) Bituminous(gonzales) and forall x (Bituminous(x) -> Hebdomadal(x)) -> therefore Hebdomadal(gonzales)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Sanders is macho. Sanders is fifth. Sanders is shed. Hassan is servile. Hassan is sinkable. Hassan is macho. Hassan is shed. If something is libyan then it is subsequent. If something is libyan and macho then it is shed. Round things are sinkable. If Sanders is subsequent and Sanders is servile then Sanders is shed. If something is fifth then it is libyan. If Hassan is subsequent then Hassan is sinkable. Sanders is not subsequent.", "logic": "\nMacho(sanders)\nFifth(sanders)\nShed(sanders)\nServile(hassan)\nSinkable(hassan)\nMacho(hassan)\nShed(hassan)\nforall x (Libyan(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) and Macho(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Subsequent(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nSubsequent(sanders) and Servile(sanders) -> Shed(sanders)\nforall x (Fifth(x) -> Libyan(x))\nSubsequent(hassan) -> Sinkable(hassan)\n\nnot Subsequent(sanders)\n\nFifth(sanders) and forall x (Fifth(x) -> Libyan(x)) -> therefore Libyan(sanders) Libyan(sanders) and forall x (Libyan(x) -> Subsequent(x)) -> therefore Subsequent(sanders)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Voltaire is nautical. Voltaire is hexagonal. Voltaire is snuffly. Ginelle is cxxv. Ginelle is multiplied. Ginelle is nautical. Ginelle is snuffly. If something is biped then it is humped. If something is biped and nautical then it is snuffly. Round things are multiplied. If Voltaire is humped and Voltaire is cxxv then Voltaire is snuffly. If something is hexagonal then it is biped. If Ginelle is humped then Ginelle is multiplied. Voltaire is multiplied.", "logic": "\nNautical(voltaire)\nHexagonal(voltaire)\nSnuffly(voltaire)\nCxxv(ginelle)\nMultiplied(ginelle)\nNautical(ginelle)\nSnuffly(ginelle)\nforall x (Biped(x) -> Humped(x))\nforall x (Biped(x) and Nautical(x) -> Snuffly(x))\nforall x (Humped(x) -> Multiplied(x))\nHumped(voltaire) and Cxxv(voltaire) -> Snuffly(voltaire)\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) -> Biped(x))\nHumped(ginelle) -> Multiplied(ginelle)\n\nMultiplied(voltaire)\n\nHexagonal(voltaire) and forall x (Hexagonal(x) -> Biped(x)) -> therefore Biped(voltaire) Biped(voltaire) and forall x (Biped(x) -> Humped(x)) -> therefore Humped(voltaire) Humped(voltaire) and forall x (Humped(x) -> Multiplied(x)) -> therefore Multiplied(voltaire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Maryanne is ungrateful. Maryanne is lopsided. Maryanne is reversed. Toma is decorated. Toma is unimpeded. Toma is ungrateful. Toma is reversed. If something is chartered then it is viewable. If something is chartered and ungrateful then it is reversed. Round things are unimpeded. If Maryanne is viewable and Maryanne is decorated then Maryanne is reversed. If something is lopsided then it is chartered. If Toma is viewable then Toma is unimpeded. Maryanne is not unimpeded.", "logic": "\nUngrateful(maryanne)\nLopsided(maryanne)\nReversed(maryanne)\nDecorated(toma)\nUnimpeded(toma)\nUngrateful(toma)\nReversed(toma)\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> Reversed(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nViewable(maryanne) and Decorated(maryanne) -> Reversed(maryanne)\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Chartered(x))\nViewable(toma) -> Unimpeded(toma)\n\nnot Unimpeded(maryanne)\n\nLopsided(maryanne) and forall x (Lopsided(x) -> Chartered(x)) -> therefore Chartered(maryanne) Chartered(maryanne) and forall x (Chartered(x) -> Viewable(x)) -> therefore Viewable(maryanne) Viewable(maryanne) and forall x (Viewable(x) -> Unimpeded(x)) -> therefore Unimpeded(maryanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Trevor is slaveless. Trevor is saporous. Trevor is pouched. Prue is oblique. Prue is biracial. Prue is slaveless. Prue is pouched. If something is forbidden then it is awol. If something is forbidden and slaveless then it is pouched. Round things are biracial. If Trevor is awol and Trevor is oblique then Trevor is pouched. If something is saporous then it is forbidden. If Prue is awol then Prue is biracial. Prue is not awol.", "logic": "\nSlaveless(trevor)\nSaporous(trevor)\nPouched(trevor)\nOblique(prue)\nBiracial(prue)\nSlaveless(prue)\nPouched(prue)\nforall x (Forbidden(x) -> Awol(x))\nforall x (Forbidden(x) and Slaveless(x) -> Pouched(x))\nforall x (Awol(x) -> Biracial(x))\nAwol(trevor) and Oblique(trevor) -> Pouched(trevor)\nforall x (Saporous(x) -> Forbidden(x))\nAwol(prue) -> Biracial(prue)\n\nnot Awol(prue)\n\nforall x (Forbidden(x) -> Awol(x)) <- forall x (Saporous(x) -> Forbidden(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Adelle is mesolithic. Adelle is terse. Adelle is plumy. Minetta is demented. Minetta is twenty. Minetta is mesolithic. Minetta is plumy. If something is craven then it is adamant. If something is craven and mesolithic then it is plumy. Round things are twenty. If Adelle is adamant and Adelle is demented then Adelle is plumy. If something is terse then it is craven. If Minetta is adamant then Minetta is twenty. Minetta is craven.", "logic": "\nMesolithic(adelle)\nTerse(adelle)\nPlumy(adelle)\nDemented(minetta)\nTwenty(minetta)\nMesolithic(minetta)\nPlumy(minetta)\nforall x (Craven(x) -> Adamant(x))\nforall x (Craven(x) and Mesolithic(x) -> Plumy(x))\nforall x (Adamant(x) -> Twenty(x))\nAdamant(adelle) and Demented(adelle) -> Plumy(adelle)\nforall x (Terse(x) -> Craven(x))\nAdamant(minetta) -> Twenty(minetta)\n\nCraven(minetta)\n\nforall x (Terse(x) -> Craven(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Waneta is nonaged. Waneta is plutonic. Waneta is nonionized. Eydie is immune. Eydie is innovative. Eydie is nonaged. Eydie is nonionized. If something is scraggy then it is causal. If something is scraggy and nonaged then it is nonionized. Round things are innovative. If Waneta is causal and Waneta is immune then Waneta is nonionized. If something is plutonic then it is scraggy. If Eydie is causal then Eydie is innovative. Eydie is not plutonic.", "logic": "\nNonaged(waneta)\nPlutonic(waneta)\nNonionized(waneta)\nImmune(eydie)\nInnovative(eydie)\nNonaged(eydie)\nNonionized(eydie)\nforall x (Scraggy(x) -> Causal(x))\nforall x (Scraggy(x) and Nonaged(x) -> Nonionized(x))\nforall x (Causal(x) -> Innovative(x))\nCausal(waneta) and Immune(waneta) -> Nonionized(waneta)\nforall x (Plutonic(x) -> Scraggy(x))\nCausal(eydie) -> Innovative(eydie)\n\nnot Plutonic(eydie)\n\nnot Plutonic(eydie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Rod is cynical. Rod is uncaulked. Rod is craved. Earle is sanitized. Earle is nasal. Earle is cynical. Earle is craved. If something is ceruminous then it is realistic. If something is ceruminous and cynical then it is craved. Round things are nasal. If Rod is realistic and Rod is sanitized then Rod is craved. If something is uncaulked then it is ceruminous. If Earle is realistic then Earle is nasal. Rod is sanitized.", "logic": "\nCynical(rod)\nUncaulked(rod)\nCraved(rod)\nSanitized(earle)\nNasal(earle)\nCynical(earle)\nCraved(earle)\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Realistic(x))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) and Cynical(x) -> Craved(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) -> Nasal(x))\nRealistic(rod) and Sanitized(rod) -> Craved(rod)\nforall x (Uncaulked(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nRealistic(earle) -> Nasal(earle)\n\nSanitized(rod)\n\nSanitized(rod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Timi is diluted. Marcy is singular. Sonnnie is unabused. All unabused, wriggly things are crownless. All opportune things are unabused. Young, crownless things are wriggly. All floodlit things are opportune. If something is wriggly and singular then it is unabused. Young things are floodlit. Marcy is singular.", "logic": "\nDiluted(timi)\nSingular(marcy)\nUnabused(sonnnie)\nforall x (Unabused(x) and Wriggly(x) -> Crownless(x))\nforall x (Opportune(x) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) and Crownless(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Floodlit(x) -> Opportune(x))\nforall x (Wriggly(x) and Singular(x) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Floodlit(x))\n\nSingular(marcy)\n\ntherefore Singular(marcy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Rachael is aided. Hadrian is hospitable. Sarette is centenary. All centenary, contested things are alloyed. All bereaved things are centenary. Young, alloyed things are contested. All sicilian things are bereaved. If something is contested and hospitable then it is centenary. Young things are sicilian. Rachael is not aided.", "logic": "\nAided(rachael)\nHospitable(hadrian)\nCentenary(sarette)\nforall x (Centenary(x) and Contested(x) -> Alloyed(x))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) -> Centenary(x))\nforall x (Hospitable(x) and Alloyed(x) -> Contested(x))\nforall x (Sicilian(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Contested(x) and Hospitable(x) -> Centenary(x))\nforall x (Hospitable(x) -> Sicilian(x))\n\nnot Aided(rachael)\n\ntherefore Aided(rachael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Cathryn is affirmable. Torrey is cypriot. Sabrina is quality. All quality, exterior things are watchful. All bacterioid things are quality. Young, watchful things are exterior. All nestorian things are bacterioid. If something is exterior and cypriot then it is quality. Young things are nestorian. Torrey is nestorian.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(cathryn)\nCypriot(torrey)\nQuality(sabrina)\nforall x (Quality(x) and Exterior(x) -> Watchful(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Quality(x))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and Watchful(x) -> Exterior(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Exterior(x) and Cypriot(x) -> Quality(x))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) -> Nestorian(x))\n\nNestorian(torrey)\n\nCypriot(torrey) and forall x (Cypriot(x) -> Nestorian(x)) -> therefore Nestorian(torrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Durante is alright. Beckie is flexuous. Lonnie is basined. All basined, antisocial things are limber. All mulish things are basined. Young, limber things are antisocial. All spacy things are mulish. If something is antisocial and flexuous then it is basined. Young things are spacy. Beckie is not spacy.", "logic": "\nAlright(durante)\nFlexuous(beckie)\nBasined(lonnie)\nforall x (Basined(x) and Antisocial(x) -> Limber(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Flexuous(x) and Limber(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Antisocial(x) and Flexuous(x) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Flexuous(x) -> Spacy(x))\n\nnot Spacy(beckie)\n\nFlexuous(beckie) and forall x (Flexuous(x) -> Spacy(x)) -> therefore Spacy(beckie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Corly is flashy. Annmaria is fitful. Sarita is ahorse. All ahorse, turkmen things are drilled. All taillike things are ahorse. Young, drilled things are turkmen. All unfeasible things are taillike. If something is turkmen and fitful then it is ahorse. Young things are unfeasible. Annmaria is taillike.", "logic": "\nFlashy(corly)\nFitful(annmaria)\nAhorse(sarita)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) and Turkmen(x) -> Drilled(x))\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Fitful(x) and Drilled(x) -> Turkmen(x))\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) -> Taillike(x))\nforall x (Turkmen(x) and Fitful(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Fitful(x) -> Unfeasible(x))\n\nTaillike(annmaria)\n\nFitful(annmaria) and forall x (Fitful(x) -> Unfeasible(x)) -> therefore Unfeasible(annmaria) Unfeasible(annmaria) and forall x (Unfeasible(x) -> Taillike(x)) -> therefore Taillike(annmaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Diann is agone. Shannan is lotic. Atlante is supporting. All supporting, both things are gaelic. All eudemonic things are supporting. Young, gaelic things are both. All cryogenic things are eudemonic. If something is both and lotic then it is supporting. Young things are cryogenic. Shannan is not eudemonic.", "logic": "\nAgone(diann)\nLotic(shannan)\nSupporting(atlante)\nforall x (Supporting(x) and Both(x) -> Gaelic(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) -> Supporting(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) and Gaelic(x) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Eudemonic(x))\nforall x (Both(x) and Lotic(x) -> Supporting(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\n\nnot Eudemonic(shannan)\n\nLotic(shannan) and forall x (Lotic(x) -> Cryogenic(x)) -> therefore Cryogenic(shannan) Cryogenic(shannan) and forall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Eudemonic(x)) -> therefore Eudemonic(shannan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Parsifal is scummy. Kit is damaging. Arnoldo is meditative. All meditative, heartsick things are acrophobic. All paranasal things are meditative. Young, acrophobic things are heartsick. All heroic things are paranasal. If something is heartsick and damaging then it is meditative. Young things are heroic. Kit is meditative.", "logic": "\nScummy(parsifal)\nDamaging(kit)\nMeditative(arnoldo)\nforall x (Meditative(x) and Heartsick(x) -> Acrophobic(x))\nforall x (Paranasal(x) -> Meditative(x))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and Acrophobic(x) -> Heartsick(x))\nforall x (Heroic(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Heartsick(x) and Damaging(x) -> Meditative(x))\nforall x (Damaging(x) -> Heroic(x))\n\nMeditative(kit)\n\nDamaging(kit) and forall x (Damaging(x) -> Heroic(x)) -> therefore Heroic(kit) Heroic(kit) and forall x (Heroic(x) -> Paranasal(x)) -> therefore Paranasal(kit) Paranasal(kit) and forall x (Paranasal(x) -> Meditative(x)) -> therefore Meditative(kit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Melva is embattled. Lyndsay is lunatic. Alpa is bereaved. All bereaved, unsocial things are smuggled. All lilac things are bereaved. Young, smuggled things are unsocial. All aurorean things are lilac. If something is unsocial and lunatic then it is bereaved. Young things are aurorean. Lyndsay is not bereaved.", "logic": "\nEmbattled(melva)\nLunatic(lyndsay)\nBereaved(alpa)\nforall x (Bereaved(x) and Unsocial(x) -> Smuggled(x))\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Lunatic(x) and Smuggled(x) -> Unsocial(x))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Unsocial(x) and Lunatic(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Lunatic(x) -> Aurorean(x))\n\nnot Bereaved(lyndsay)\n\nLunatic(lyndsay) and forall x (Lunatic(x) -> Aurorean(x)) -> therefore Aurorean(lyndsay) Aurorean(lyndsay) and forall x (Aurorean(x) -> Lilac(x)) -> therefore Lilac(lyndsay) Lilac(lyndsay) and forall x (Lilac(x) -> Bereaved(x)) -> therefore Bereaved(lyndsay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Johnna is downcast. Allin is consecrate. Gunter is logistical. All logistical, crumpled things are hedged. All polydactyl things are logistical. Young, hedged things are crumpled. All unshapen things are polydactyl. If something is crumpled and consecrate then it is logistical. Young things are unshapen. Allin is not crumpled.", "logic": "\nDowncast(johnna)\nConsecrate(allin)\nLogistical(gunter)\nforall x (Logistical(x) and Crumpled(x) -> Hedged(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Logistical(x))\nforall x (Consecrate(x) and Hedged(x) -> Crumpled(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) and Consecrate(x) -> Logistical(x))\nforall x (Consecrate(x) -> Unshapen(x))\n\nnot Crumpled(allin)\n\nforall x (Consecrate(x) and Hedged(x) -> Crumpled(x)) <- forall x (Logistical(x) and Crumpled(x) -> Hedged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Winne is cashed. Raymund is portly. Barthel is wimpy. All wimpy, cheap things are formative. All backstair things are wimpy. Young, formative things are cheap. All cursive things are backstair. If something is cheap and portly then it is wimpy. Young things are cursive. Winne is wimpy.", "logic": "\nCashed(winne)\nPortly(raymund)\nWimpy(barthel)\nforall x (Wimpy(x) and Cheap(x) -> Formative(x))\nforall x (Backstair(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nforall x (Portly(x) and Formative(x) -> Cheap(x))\nforall x (Cursive(x) -> Backstair(x))\nforall x (Cheap(x) and Portly(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nforall x (Portly(x) -> Cursive(x))\n\nWimpy(winne)\n\nforall x (Backstair(x) -> Wimpy(x)) <- forall x (Cursive(x) -> Backstair(x)) <- forall x (Portly(x) -> Cursive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Erena is credal. Marcie is unsymbolic. Temp is hittite. All hittite, titled things are knifelike. All faulty things are hittite. Young, knifelike things are titled. All stoppered things are faulty. If something is titled and unsymbolic then it is hittite. Young things are stoppered. Marcie is not knifelike.", "logic": "\nCredal(erena)\nUnsymbolic(marcie)\nHittite(temp)\nforall x (Hittite(x) and Titled(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Faulty(x) -> Hittite(x))\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) and Knifelike(x) -> Titled(x))\nforall x (Stoppered(x) -> Faulty(x))\nforall x (Titled(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Hittite(x))\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Stoppered(x))\n\nnot Knifelike(marcie)\n\nforall x (Hittite(x) and Titled(x) -> Knifelike(x)) <- forall x (Unsymbolic(x) and Knifelike(x) -> Titled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Etty is aglow. Oralle is unrevived. Enrique is miserable. All miserable, decrepit things are arenaceous. All dashing things are miserable. Young, arenaceous things are decrepit. All pizzicato things are dashing. If something is decrepit and unrevived then it is miserable. Young things are pizzicato. Etty is arenaceous.", "logic": "\nAglow(etty)\nUnrevived(oralle)\nMiserable(enrique)\nforall x (Miserable(x) and Decrepit(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Miserable(x))\nforall x (Unrevived(x) and Arenaceous(x) -> Decrepit(x))\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Decrepit(x) and Unrevived(x) -> Miserable(x))\nforall x (Unrevived(x) -> Pizzicato(x))\n\nArenaceous(etty)\n\nforall x (Miserable(x) and Decrepit(x) -> Arenaceous(x)) <- forall x (Unrevived(x) and Arenaceous(x) -> Decrepit(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Thaxter is precooled. Edithe is orientated. Lanna is anisogamic. All anisogamic, fulfilled things are surviving. All unpeopled things are anisogamic. Young, surviving things are fulfilled. All crookback things are unpeopled. If something is fulfilled and orientated then it is anisogamic. Young things are crookback. Edithe is not precooled.", "logic": "\nPrecooled(thaxter)\nOrientated(edithe)\nAnisogamic(lanna)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Fulfilled(x) -> Surviving(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Orientated(x) and Surviving(x) -> Fulfilled(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Unpeopled(x))\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) and Orientated(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Orientated(x) -> Crookback(x))\n\nnot Precooled(edithe)\n\nnot Precooled(edithe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Puff is pathogenic. Hayward is bionomic. Ruthanne is filar. All filar, organised things are aphaeretic. All nuptial things are filar. Young, aphaeretic things are organised. All amphibian things are nuptial. If something is organised and bionomic then it is filar. Young things are amphibian. Puff is bionomic.", "logic": "\nPathogenic(puff)\nBionomic(hayward)\nFilar(ruthanne)\nforall x (Filar(x) and Organised(x) -> Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> Filar(x))\nforall x (Bionomic(x) and Aphaeretic(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Amphibian(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) and Bionomic(x) -> Filar(x))\nforall x (Bionomic(x) -> Amphibian(x))\n\nBionomic(puff)\n\nBionomic(puff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Vivian is auxetic. Aveline is perverse. Elyse is refreshful. All refreshful, hypethral things are luculent. All biyearly things are refreshful. Young, luculent things are hypethral. All honduran things are biyearly. If something is hypethral and perverse then it is refreshful. Young things are honduran. Elyse is not auxetic.", "logic": "\nAuxetic(vivian)\nPerverse(aveline)\nRefreshful(elyse)\nforall x (Refreshful(x) and Hypethral(x) -> Luculent(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> Refreshful(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) and Luculent(x) -> Hypethral(x))\nforall x (Honduran(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) and Perverse(x) -> Refreshful(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Honduran(x))\n\nnot Auxetic(elyse)\n\nnot Auxetic(elyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Frederic is recurvate. Reginald is unredeemed. Laurette is abloom. All abloom, orphic things are forced. All spoilt things are abloom. Young, forced things are orphic. All fimbriate things are spoilt. If something is orphic and unredeemed then it is abloom. Young things are fimbriate. Laurette is unredeemed.", "logic": "\nRecurvate(frederic)\nUnredeemed(reginald)\nAbloom(laurette)\nforall x (Abloom(x) and Orphic(x) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Spoilt(x) -> Abloom(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and Forced(x) -> Orphic(x))\nforall x (Fimbriate(x) -> Spoilt(x))\nforall x (Orphic(x) and Unredeemed(x) -> Abloom(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Fimbriate(x))\n\nUnredeemed(laurette)\n\nUnredeemed(laurette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "The else is not tantamount. The else is causeless. The else is wakeful. The else is not durable. The else is trillion. The else delouse the tremaine. The else shipwreck the tremaine. The else outdo the tremaine. The tremaine is tantamount. The tremaine is causeless. The tremaine is wakeful. The tremaine is durable. The tremaine delouse the else. The tremaine does not need the else. The tremaine outdo the else. If someone shipwreck the tremaine and the tremaine shipwreck the else then the else does not visit the tremaine. If someone delouse the else and they visit the tremaine then they need the tremaine. If someone outdo the else then they visit the tremaine. If someone is wakeful and they need the tremaine then they like the tremaine. If the tremaine is durable then the tremaine delouse the else. If someone delouse the else and they do not need the tremaine then the else does not like the tremaine. If the else does not like the tremaine and the else does not need the tremaine then the tremaine is tantamount. If someone is tantamount and they do not like the else then they are not causeless. The else is not durable.", "logic": "\nnot Tantamount(else)\nCauseless(else)\nWakeful(else)\nnot Durable(else)\nTrillion(else)\nDelouse(else, tremaine)\nShipwreck(else, tremaine)\nOutdo(else, tremaine)\nTantamount(tremaine)\nCauseless(tremaine)\nWakeful(tremaine)\nDurable(tremaine)\nDelouse(tremaine, else)\nnot Shipwreck(tremaine, else)\nOutdo(tremaine, else)\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, tremaine) and Shipwreck(tremaine, else) -> not Outdo(else, tremaine))\nforall x (Delouse(x, else) and Outdo(x, tremaine) -> Shipwreck(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Outdo(x, else) -> Outdo(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) and Shipwreck(x, tremaine) -> Delouse(x, tremaine))\nDurable(tremaine) -> Delouse(tremaine, else)\nforall x (Delouse(x, else) and not Shipwreck(x, tremaine) -> not Delouse(else, tremaine))\nnot Delouse(else, tremaine) and not Shipwreck(else, tremaine) -> Tantamount(tremaine)\nforall x (Tantamount(x) and not Delouse(x, else) -> not Causeless(x))\n\nnot Durable(else)\n\ntherefore not Durable(else)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The alexis is not bahraini. The alexis is clockwise. The alexis is peremptory. The alexis is not indecent. The alexis is rodlike. The alexis prolapse the stanford. The alexis perturb the stanford. The alexis okay the stanford. The stanford is bahraini. The stanford is clockwise. The stanford is peremptory. The stanford is indecent. The stanford prolapse the alexis. The stanford does not need the alexis. The stanford okay the alexis. If someone perturb the stanford and the stanford perturb the alexis then the alexis does not visit the stanford. If someone prolapse the alexis and they visit the stanford then they need the stanford. If someone okay the alexis then they visit the stanford. If someone is peremptory and they need the stanford then they like the stanford. If the stanford is indecent then the stanford prolapse the alexis. If someone prolapse the alexis and they do not need the stanford then the alexis does not like the stanford. If the alexis does not like the stanford and the alexis does not need the stanford then the stanford is bahraini. If someone is bahraini and they do not like the alexis then they are not clockwise. The alexis does not need the stanford.", "logic": "\nnot Bahraini(alexis)\nClockwise(alexis)\nPeremptory(alexis)\nnot Indecent(alexis)\nRodlike(alexis)\nProlapse(alexis, stanford)\nPerturb(alexis, stanford)\nOkay(alexis, stanford)\nBahraini(stanford)\nClockwise(stanford)\nPeremptory(stanford)\nIndecent(stanford)\nProlapse(stanford, alexis)\nnot Perturb(stanford, alexis)\nOkay(stanford, alexis)\nforall x (Perturb(x, stanford) and Perturb(stanford, alexis) -> not Okay(alexis, stanford))\nforall x (Prolapse(x, alexis) and Okay(x, stanford) -> Perturb(x, stanford))\nforall x (Okay(x, alexis) -> Okay(x, stanford))\nforall x (Peremptory(x) and Perturb(x, stanford) -> Prolapse(x, stanford))\nIndecent(stanford) -> Prolapse(stanford, alexis)\nforall x (Prolapse(x, alexis) and not Perturb(x, stanford) -> not Prolapse(alexis, stanford))\nnot Prolapse(alexis, stanford) and not Perturb(alexis, stanford) -> Bahraini(stanford)\nforall x (Bahraini(x) and not Prolapse(x, alexis) -> not Clockwise(x))\n\nnot Perturb(alexis, stanford)\n\ntherefore Perturb(alexis, stanford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The ardath is not zygomatic. The ardath is snowy. The ardath is weepy. The ardath is not luscious. The ardath is scrupulous. The ardath alibi the angelita. The ardath compart the angelita. The ardath encase the angelita. The angelita is zygomatic. The angelita is snowy. The angelita is weepy. The angelita is luscious. The angelita alibi the ardath. The angelita does not need the ardath. The angelita encase the ardath. If someone compart the angelita and the angelita compart the ardath then the ardath does not visit the angelita. If someone alibi the ardath and they visit the angelita then they need the angelita. If someone encase the ardath then they visit the angelita. If someone is weepy and they need the angelita then they like the angelita. If the angelita is luscious then the angelita alibi the ardath. If someone alibi the ardath and they do not need the angelita then the ardath does not like the angelita. If the ardath does not like the angelita and the ardath does not need the angelita then the angelita is zygomatic. If someone is zygomatic and they do not like the ardath then they are not snowy. The angelita encase the angelita.", "logic": "\nnot Zygomatic(ardath)\nSnowy(ardath)\nWeepy(ardath)\nnot Luscious(ardath)\nScrupulous(ardath)\nAlibi(ardath, angelita)\nCompart(ardath, angelita)\nEncase(ardath, angelita)\nZygomatic(angelita)\nSnowy(angelita)\nWeepy(angelita)\nLuscious(angelita)\nAlibi(angelita, ardath)\nnot Compart(angelita, ardath)\nEncase(angelita, ardath)\nforall x (Compart(x, angelita) and Compart(angelita, ardath) -> not Encase(ardath, angelita))\nforall x (Alibi(x, ardath) and Encase(x, angelita) -> Compart(x, angelita))\nforall x (Encase(x, ardath) -> Encase(x, angelita))\nforall x (Weepy(x) and Compart(x, angelita) -> Alibi(x, angelita))\nLuscious(angelita) -> Alibi(angelita, ardath)\nforall x (Alibi(x, ardath) and not Compart(x, angelita) -> not Alibi(ardath, angelita))\nnot Alibi(ardath, angelita) and not Compart(ardath, angelita) -> Zygomatic(angelita)\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and not Alibi(x, ardath) -> not Snowy(x))\n\nEncase(angelita, angelita)\n\nEncase(angelita, ardath) and forall x (Encase(x, ardath) -> Encase(x, angelita)) -> therefore Encase(angelita, angelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The caro is not touched. The caro is disturbed. The caro is chlamydial. The caro is not papistic. The caro is steady. The caro breed the ingram. The caro venesect the ingram. The caro swim the ingram. The ingram is touched. The ingram is disturbed. The ingram is chlamydial. The ingram is papistic. The ingram breed the caro. The ingram does not need the caro. The ingram swim the caro. If someone venesect the ingram and the ingram venesect the caro then the caro does not visit the ingram. If someone breed the caro and they visit the ingram then they need the ingram. If someone swim the caro then they visit the ingram. If someone is chlamydial and they need the ingram then they like the ingram. If the ingram is papistic then the ingram breed the caro. If someone breed the caro and they do not need the ingram then the caro does not like the ingram. If the caro does not like the ingram and the caro does not need the ingram then the ingram is touched. If someone is touched and they do not like the caro then they are not disturbed. The ingram does not visit the ingram.", "logic": "\nnot Touched(caro)\nDisturbed(caro)\nChlamydial(caro)\nnot Papistic(caro)\nSteady(caro)\nBreed(caro, ingram)\nVenesect(caro, ingram)\nSwim(caro, ingram)\nTouched(ingram)\nDisturbed(ingram)\nChlamydial(ingram)\nPapistic(ingram)\nBreed(ingram, caro)\nnot Venesect(ingram, caro)\nSwim(ingram, caro)\nforall x (Venesect(x, ingram) and Venesect(ingram, caro) -> not Swim(caro, ingram))\nforall x (Breed(x, caro) and Swim(x, ingram) -> Venesect(x, ingram))\nforall x (Swim(x, caro) -> Swim(x, ingram))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) and Venesect(x, ingram) -> Breed(x, ingram))\nPapistic(ingram) -> Breed(ingram, caro)\nforall x (Breed(x, caro) and not Venesect(x, ingram) -> not Breed(caro, ingram))\nnot Breed(caro, ingram) and not Venesect(caro, ingram) -> Touched(ingram)\nforall x (Touched(x) and not Breed(x, caro) -> not Disturbed(x))\n\nnot Swim(ingram, ingram)\n\nSwim(ingram, caro) and forall x (Swim(x, caro) -> Swim(x, ingram)) -> therefore Swim(ingram, ingram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The kostas is not herculean. The kostas is despoiled. The kostas is agelong. The kostas is not lxxxiii. The kostas is arborical. The kostas stagger the antonino. The kostas confess the antonino. The kostas shark the antonino. The antonino is herculean. The antonino is despoiled. The antonino is agelong. The antonino is lxxxiii. The antonino stagger the kostas. The antonino does not need the kostas. The antonino shark the kostas. If someone confess the antonino and the antonino confess the kostas then the kostas does not visit the antonino. If someone stagger the kostas and they visit the antonino then they need the antonino. If someone shark the kostas then they visit the antonino. If someone is agelong and they need the antonino then they like the antonino. If the antonino is lxxxiii then the antonino stagger the kostas. If someone stagger the kostas and they do not need the antonino then the kostas does not like the antonino. If the kostas does not like the antonino and the kostas does not need the antonino then the antonino is herculean. If someone is herculean and they do not like the kostas then they are not despoiled. The antonino confess the antonino.", "logic": "\nnot Herculean(kostas)\nDespoiled(kostas)\nAgelong(kostas)\nnot Lxxxiii(kostas)\nArborical(kostas)\nStagger(kostas, antonino)\nConfess(kostas, antonino)\nShark(kostas, antonino)\nHerculean(antonino)\nDespoiled(antonino)\nAgelong(antonino)\nLxxxiii(antonino)\nStagger(antonino, kostas)\nnot Confess(antonino, kostas)\nShark(antonino, kostas)\nforall x (Confess(x, antonino) and Confess(antonino, kostas) -> not Shark(kostas, antonino))\nforall x (Stagger(x, kostas) and Shark(x, antonino) -> Confess(x, antonino))\nforall x (Shark(x, kostas) -> Shark(x, antonino))\nforall x (Agelong(x) and Confess(x, antonino) -> Stagger(x, antonino))\nLxxxiii(antonino) -> Stagger(antonino, kostas)\nforall x (Stagger(x, kostas) and not Confess(x, antonino) -> not Stagger(kostas, antonino))\nnot Stagger(kostas, antonino) and not Confess(kostas, antonino) -> Herculean(antonino)\nforall x (Herculean(x) and not Stagger(x, kostas) -> not Despoiled(x))\n\nConfess(antonino, antonino)\n\nShark(antonino, kostas) and forall x (Shark(x, kostas) -> Shark(x, antonino)) -> therefore Shark(antonino, antonino) Stagger(antonino, kostas) and Shark(antonino, antonino) and forall x (Stagger(x, kostas) and Shark(x, antonino) -> Confess(x, antonino)) -> therefore Confess(antonino, antonino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The rivi is not prolonged. The rivi is rocklike. The rivi is diminutive. The rivi is not dimorphic. The rivi is punk. The rivi interject the esteban. The rivi coldcock the esteban. The rivi overfill the esteban. The esteban is prolonged. The esteban is rocklike. The esteban is diminutive. The esteban is dimorphic. The esteban interject the rivi. The esteban does not need the rivi. The esteban overfill the rivi. If someone coldcock the esteban and the esteban coldcock the rivi then the rivi does not visit the esteban. If someone interject the rivi and they visit the esteban then they need the esteban. If someone overfill the rivi then they visit the esteban. If someone is diminutive and they need the esteban then they like the esteban. If the esteban is dimorphic then the esteban interject the rivi. If someone interject the rivi and they do not need the esteban then the rivi does not like the esteban. If the rivi does not like the esteban and the rivi does not need the esteban then the esteban is prolonged. If someone is prolonged and they do not like the rivi then they are not rocklike. The esteban does not need the esteban.", "logic": "\nnot Prolonged(rivi)\nRocklike(rivi)\nDiminutive(rivi)\nnot Dimorphic(rivi)\nPunk(rivi)\nInterject(rivi, esteban)\nColdcock(rivi, esteban)\nOverfill(rivi, esteban)\nProlonged(esteban)\nRocklike(esteban)\nDiminutive(esteban)\nDimorphic(esteban)\nInterject(esteban, rivi)\nnot Coldcock(esteban, rivi)\nOverfill(esteban, rivi)\nforall x (Coldcock(x, esteban) and Coldcock(esteban, rivi) -> not Overfill(rivi, esteban))\nforall x (Interject(x, rivi) and Overfill(x, esteban) -> Coldcock(x, esteban))\nforall x (Overfill(x, rivi) -> Overfill(x, esteban))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) and Coldcock(x, esteban) -> Interject(x, esteban))\nDimorphic(esteban) -> Interject(esteban, rivi)\nforall x (Interject(x, rivi) and not Coldcock(x, esteban) -> not Interject(rivi, esteban))\nnot Interject(rivi, esteban) and not Coldcock(rivi, esteban) -> Prolonged(esteban)\nforall x (Prolonged(x) and not Interject(x, rivi) -> not Rocklike(x))\n\nnot Coldcock(esteban, esteban)\n\nOverfill(esteban, rivi) and forall x (Overfill(x, rivi) -> Overfill(x, esteban)) -> therefore Overfill(esteban, esteban) Interject(esteban, rivi) and Overfill(esteban, esteban) and forall x (Interject(x, rivi) and Overfill(x, esteban) -> Coldcock(x, esteban)) -> therefore Coldcock(esteban, esteban)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The sandye is not unspoilt. The sandye is boeotian. The sandye is cationic. The sandye is not sown. The sandye is foetal. The sandye spacewalk the jerzy. The sandye prologise the jerzy. The sandye waive the jerzy. The jerzy is unspoilt. The jerzy is boeotian. The jerzy is cationic. The jerzy is sown. The jerzy spacewalk the sandye. The jerzy does not need the sandye. The jerzy waive the sandye. If someone prologise the jerzy and the jerzy prologise the sandye then the sandye does not visit the jerzy. If someone spacewalk the sandye and they visit the jerzy then they need the jerzy. If someone waive the sandye then they visit the jerzy. If someone is cationic and they need the jerzy then they like the jerzy. If the jerzy is sown then the jerzy spacewalk the sandye. If someone spacewalk the sandye and they do not need the jerzy then the sandye does not like the jerzy. If the sandye does not like the jerzy and the sandye does not need the jerzy then the jerzy is unspoilt. If someone is unspoilt and they do not like the sandye then they are not boeotian. The jerzy spacewalk the jerzy.", "logic": "\nnot Unspoilt(sandye)\nBoeotian(sandye)\nCationic(sandye)\nnot Sown(sandye)\nFoetal(sandye)\nSpacewalk(sandye, jerzy)\nPrologise(sandye, jerzy)\nWaive(sandye, jerzy)\nUnspoilt(jerzy)\nBoeotian(jerzy)\nCationic(jerzy)\nSown(jerzy)\nSpacewalk(jerzy, sandye)\nnot Prologise(jerzy, sandye)\nWaive(jerzy, sandye)\nforall x (Prologise(x, jerzy) and Prologise(jerzy, sandye) -> not Waive(sandye, jerzy))\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, sandye) and Waive(x, jerzy) -> Prologise(x, jerzy))\nforall x (Waive(x, sandye) -> Waive(x, jerzy))\nforall x (Cationic(x) and Prologise(x, jerzy) -> Spacewalk(x, jerzy))\nSown(jerzy) -> Spacewalk(jerzy, sandye)\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, sandye) and not Prologise(x, jerzy) -> not Spacewalk(sandye, jerzy))\nnot Spacewalk(sandye, jerzy) and not Prologise(sandye, jerzy) -> Unspoilt(jerzy)\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) and not Spacewalk(x, sandye) -> not Boeotian(x))\n\nSpacewalk(jerzy, jerzy)\n\nWaive(jerzy, sandye) and forall x (Waive(x, sandye) -> Waive(x, jerzy)) -> therefore Waive(jerzy, jerzy) Spacewalk(jerzy, sandye) and Waive(jerzy, jerzy) and forall x (Spacewalk(x, sandye) and Waive(x, jerzy) -> Prologise(x, jerzy)) -> therefore Prologise(jerzy, jerzy) Cationic(jerzy) and Prologise(jerzy, jerzy) and forall x (Cationic(x) and Prologise(x, jerzy) -> Spacewalk(x, jerzy)) -> therefore Spacewalk(jerzy, jerzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The annnora is not unstudied. The annnora is clean. The annnora is lobar. The annnora is not muddy. The annnora is torpid. The annnora nullify the samson. The annnora task the samson. The annnora rivet the samson. The samson is unstudied. The samson is clean. The samson is lobar. The samson is muddy. The samson nullify the annnora. The samson does not need the annnora. The samson rivet the annnora. If someone task the samson and the samson task the annnora then the annnora does not visit the samson. If someone nullify the annnora and they visit the samson then they need the samson. If someone rivet the annnora then they visit the samson. If someone is lobar and they need the samson then they like the samson. If the samson is muddy then the samson nullify the annnora. If someone nullify the annnora and they do not need the samson then the annnora does not like the samson. If the annnora does not like the samson and the annnora does not need the samson then the samson is unstudied. If someone is unstudied and they do not like the annnora then they are not clean. The samson does not like the samson.", "logic": "\nnot Unstudied(annnora)\nClean(annnora)\nLobar(annnora)\nnot Muddy(annnora)\nTorpid(annnora)\nNullify(annnora, samson)\nTask(annnora, samson)\nRivet(annnora, samson)\nUnstudied(samson)\nClean(samson)\nLobar(samson)\nMuddy(samson)\nNullify(samson, annnora)\nnot Task(samson, annnora)\nRivet(samson, annnora)\nforall x (Task(x, samson) and Task(samson, annnora) -> not Rivet(annnora, samson))\nforall x (Nullify(x, annnora) and Rivet(x, samson) -> Task(x, samson))\nforall x (Rivet(x, annnora) -> Rivet(x, samson))\nforall x (Lobar(x) and Task(x, samson) -> Nullify(x, samson))\nMuddy(samson) -> Nullify(samson, annnora)\nforall x (Nullify(x, annnora) and not Task(x, samson) -> not Nullify(annnora, samson))\nnot Nullify(annnora, samson) and not Task(annnora, samson) -> Unstudied(samson)\nforall x (Unstudied(x) and not Nullify(x, annnora) -> not Clean(x))\n\nnot Nullify(samson, samson)\n\nRivet(samson, annnora) and forall x (Rivet(x, annnora) -> Rivet(x, samson)) -> therefore Rivet(samson, samson) Nullify(samson, annnora) and Rivet(samson, samson) and forall x (Nullify(x, annnora) and Rivet(x, samson) -> Task(x, samson)) -> therefore Task(samson, samson) Lobar(samson) and Task(samson, samson) and forall x (Lobar(x) and Task(x, samson) -> Nullify(x, samson)) -> therefore Nullify(samson, samson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The elberta is not clustered. The elberta is cleft. The elberta is especial. The elberta is not unsheathed. The elberta is isthmian. The elberta tinkle the burnaby. The elberta realign the burnaby. The elberta stripe the burnaby. The burnaby is clustered. The burnaby is cleft. The burnaby is especial. The burnaby is unsheathed. The burnaby tinkle the elberta. The burnaby does not need the elberta. The burnaby stripe the elberta. If someone realign the burnaby and the burnaby realign the elberta then the elberta does not visit the burnaby. If someone tinkle the elberta and they visit the burnaby then they need the burnaby. If someone stripe the elberta then they visit the burnaby. If someone is especial and they need the burnaby then they like the burnaby. If the burnaby is unsheathed then the burnaby tinkle the elberta. If someone tinkle the elberta and they do not need the burnaby then the elberta does not like the burnaby. If the elberta does not like the burnaby and the elberta does not need the burnaby then the burnaby is clustered. If someone is clustered and they do not like the elberta then they are not cleft. The elberta does not like the elberta.", "logic": "\nnot Clustered(elberta)\nCleft(elberta)\nEspecial(elberta)\nnot Unsheathed(elberta)\nIsthmian(elberta)\nTinkle(elberta, burnaby)\nRealign(elberta, burnaby)\nStripe(elberta, burnaby)\nClustered(burnaby)\nCleft(burnaby)\nEspecial(burnaby)\nUnsheathed(burnaby)\nTinkle(burnaby, elberta)\nnot Realign(burnaby, elberta)\nStripe(burnaby, elberta)\nforall x (Realign(x, burnaby) and Realign(burnaby, elberta) -> not Stripe(elberta, burnaby))\nforall x (Tinkle(x, elberta) and Stripe(x, burnaby) -> Realign(x, burnaby))\nforall x (Stripe(x, elberta) -> Stripe(x, burnaby))\nforall x (Especial(x) and Realign(x, burnaby) -> Tinkle(x, burnaby))\nUnsheathed(burnaby) -> Tinkle(burnaby, elberta)\nforall x (Tinkle(x, elberta) and not Realign(x, burnaby) -> not Tinkle(elberta, burnaby))\nnot Tinkle(elberta, burnaby) and not Realign(elberta, burnaby) -> Clustered(burnaby)\nforall x (Clustered(x) and not Tinkle(x, elberta) -> not Cleft(x))\n\nnot Tinkle(elberta, elberta)\n\nnot Tinkle(elberta, elberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The valerye is not violative. The valerye is hydrated. The valerye is bipolar. The valerye is not anatomic. The valerye is pimpled. The valerye unite the dacey. The valerye relativise the dacey. The valerye dehisce the dacey. The dacey is violative. The dacey is hydrated. The dacey is bipolar. The dacey is anatomic. The dacey unite the valerye. The dacey does not need the valerye. The dacey dehisce the valerye. If someone relativise the dacey and the dacey relativise the valerye then the valerye does not visit the dacey. If someone unite the valerye and they visit the dacey then they need the dacey. If someone dehisce the valerye then they visit the dacey. If someone is bipolar and they need the dacey then they like the dacey. If the dacey is anatomic then the dacey unite the valerye. If someone unite the valerye and they do not need the dacey then the valerye does not like the dacey. If the valerye does not like the dacey and the valerye does not need the dacey then the dacey is violative. If someone is violative and they do not like the valerye then they are not hydrated. The valerye dehisce the valerye.", "logic": "\nnot Violative(valerye)\nHydrated(valerye)\nBipolar(valerye)\nnot Anatomic(valerye)\nPimpled(valerye)\nUnite(valerye, dacey)\nRelativise(valerye, dacey)\nDehisce(valerye, dacey)\nViolative(dacey)\nHydrated(dacey)\nBipolar(dacey)\nAnatomic(dacey)\nUnite(dacey, valerye)\nnot Relativise(dacey, valerye)\nDehisce(dacey, valerye)\nforall x (Relativise(x, dacey) and Relativise(dacey, valerye) -> not Dehisce(valerye, dacey))\nforall x (Unite(x, valerye) and Dehisce(x, dacey) -> Relativise(x, dacey))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, valerye) -> Dehisce(x, dacey))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) and Relativise(x, dacey) -> Unite(x, dacey))\nAnatomic(dacey) -> Unite(dacey, valerye)\nforall x (Unite(x, valerye) and not Relativise(x, dacey) -> not Unite(valerye, dacey))\nnot Unite(valerye, dacey) and not Relativise(valerye, dacey) -> Violative(dacey)\nforall x (Violative(x) and not Unite(x, valerye) -> not Hydrated(x))\n\nDehisce(valerye, valerye)\n\nDehisce(valerye, valerye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The claudelle is not splintery. The claudelle is conceptual. The claudelle is chapfallen. The claudelle is not unswayed. The claudelle is spiraling. The claudelle squat the barde. The claudelle carnalise the barde. The claudelle mewl the barde. The barde is splintery. The barde is conceptual. The barde is chapfallen. The barde is unswayed. The barde squat the claudelle. The barde does not need the claudelle. The barde mewl the claudelle. If someone carnalise the barde and the barde carnalise the claudelle then the claudelle does not visit the barde. If someone squat the claudelle and they visit the barde then they need the barde. If someone mewl the claudelle then they visit the barde. If someone is chapfallen and they need the barde then they like the barde. If the barde is unswayed then the barde squat the claudelle. If someone squat the claudelle and they do not need the barde then the claudelle does not like the barde. If the claudelle does not like the barde and the claudelle does not need the barde then the barde is splintery. If someone is splintery and they do not like the claudelle then they are not conceptual. The barde is not spiraling.", "logic": "\nnot Splintery(claudelle)\nConceptual(claudelle)\nChapfallen(claudelle)\nnot Unswayed(claudelle)\nSpiraling(claudelle)\nSquat(claudelle, barde)\nCarnalise(claudelle, barde)\nMewl(claudelle, barde)\nSplintery(barde)\nConceptual(barde)\nChapfallen(barde)\nUnswayed(barde)\nSquat(barde, claudelle)\nnot Carnalise(barde, claudelle)\nMewl(barde, claudelle)\nforall x (Carnalise(x, barde) and Carnalise(barde, claudelle) -> not Mewl(claudelle, barde))\nforall x (Squat(x, claudelle) and Mewl(x, barde) -> Carnalise(x, barde))\nforall x (Mewl(x, claudelle) -> Mewl(x, barde))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and Carnalise(x, barde) -> Squat(x, barde))\nUnswayed(barde) -> Squat(barde, claudelle)\nforall x (Squat(x, claudelle) and not Carnalise(x, barde) -> not Squat(claudelle, barde))\nnot Squat(claudelle, barde) and not Carnalise(claudelle, barde) -> Splintery(barde)\nforall x (Splintery(x) and not Squat(x, claudelle) -> not Conceptual(x))\n\nnot Spiraling(barde)\n\nnot Spiraling(barde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The rusty is not pursued. The rusty is mirrorlike. The rusty is improvable. The rusty is not napping. The rusty is dissected. The rusty jelly the kostas. The rusty disarm the kostas. The rusty galvanize the kostas. The kostas is pursued. The kostas is mirrorlike. The kostas is improvable. The kostas is napping. The kostas jelly the rusty. The kostas does not need the rusty. The kostas galvanize the rusty. If someone disarm the kostas and the kostas disarm the rusty then the rusty does not visit the kostas. If someone jelly the rusty and they visit the kostas then they need the kostas. If someone galvanize the rusty then they visit the kostas. If someone is improvable and they need the kostas then they like the kostas. If the kostas is napping then the kostas jelly the rusty. If someone jelly the rusty and they do not need the kostas then the rusty does not like the kostas. If the rusty does not like the kostas and the rusty does not need the kostas then the kostas is pursued. If someone is pursued and they do not like the rusty then they are not mirrorlike. The rusty disarm the rusty.", "logic": "\nnot Pursued(rusty)\nMirrorlike(rusty)\nImprovable(rusty)\nnot Napping(rusty)\nDissected(rusty)\nJelly(rusty, kostas)\nDisarm(rusty, kostas)\nGalvanize(rusty, kostas)\nPursued(kostas)\nMirrorlike(kostas)\nImprovable(kostas)\nNapping(kostas)\nJelly(kostas, rusty)\nnot Disarm(kostas, rusty)\nGalvanize(kostas, rusty)\nforall x (Disarm(x, kostas) and Disarm(kostas, rusty) -> not Galvanize(rusty, kostas))\nforall x (Jelly(x, rusty) and Galvanize(x, kostas) -> Disarm(x, kostas))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, rusty) -> Galvanize(x, kostas))\nforall x (Improvable(x) and Disarm(x, kostas) -> Jelly(x, kostas))\nNapping(kostas) -> Jelly(kostas, rusty)\nforall x (Jelly(x, rusty) and not Disarm(x, kostas) -> not Jelly(rusty, kostas))\nnot Jelly(rusty, kostas) and not Disarm(rusty, kostas) -> Pursued(kostas)\nforall x (Pursued(x) and not Jelly(x, rusty) -> not Mirrorlike(x))\n\nDisarm(rusty, rusty)\n\nDisarm(rusty, rusty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "Casia is fahrenheit. Casia is hircine. Casia is not meagerly. Brenda is not meagerly. Brenda is starkers. Rayna is boxed. Rayna is hircine. Evette is mozambican. Evette is meagerly. Evette is not starkers. If someone is hircine and boxed then they are starkers. If Brenda is boxed then Brenda is mozambican. White people are mozambican. If Evette is not hircine then Evette is mozambican. All hircine, mozambican people are untruthful. If someone is fahrenheit and not starkers then they are not untruthful. Casia is fahrenheit.", "logic": "\nFahrenheit(casia)\nHircine(casia)\nnot Meagerly(casia)\nnot Meagerly(brenda)\nStarkers(brenda)\nBoxed(rayna)\nHircine(rayna)\nMozambican(evette)\nMeagerly(evette)\nnot Starkers(evette)\nforall x (Hircine(x) and Boxed(x) -> Starkers(x))\nBoxed(brenda) -> Mozambican(brenda)\nforall x (Starkers(x) -> Mozambican(x))\nnot Hircine(evette) -> Mozambican(evette)\nforall x (Hircine(x) and Mozambican(x) -> Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Fahrenheit(x) and not Starkers(x) -> not Untruthful(x))\n\nFahrenheit(casia)\n\ntherefore Fahrenheit(casia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Roarke is adjusted. Roarke is steroidal. Roarke is not neutral. Prentiss is not neutral. Prentiss is schematic. Brodie is noncaloric. Brodie is steroidal. Barbabra is milkless. Barbabra is neutral. Barbabra is not schematic. If someone is steroidal and noncaloric then they are schematic. If Prentiss is noncaloric then Prentiss is milkless. White people are milkless. If Barbabra is not steroidal then Barbabra is milkless. All steroidal, milkless people are vixenish. If someone is adjusted and not schematic then they are not vixenish. Prentiss is not schematic.", "logic": "\nAdjusted(roarke)\nSteroidal(roarke)\nnot Neutral(roarke)\nnot Neutral(prentiss)\nSchematic(prentiss)\nNoncaloric(brodie)\nSteroidal(brodie)\nMilkless(barbabra)\nNeutral(barbabra)\nnot Schematic(barbabra)\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Noncaloric(x) -> Schematic(x))\nNoncaloric(prentiss) -> Milkless(prentiss)\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Milkless(x))\nnot Steroidal(barbabra) -> Milkless(barbabra)\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Milkless(x) -> Vixenish(x))\nforall x (Adjusted(x) and not Schematic(x) -> not Vixenish(x))\n\nnot Schematic(prentiss)\n\ntherefore Schematic(prentiss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Amabelle is mexican. Amabelle is uncured. Amabelle is not coeliac. Kirstin is not coeliac. Kirstin is rackety. Leda is clubbable. Leda is uncured. Titus is meagre. Titus is coeliac. Titus is not rackety. If someone is uncured and clubbable then they are rackety. If Kirstin is clubbable then Kirstin is meagre. White people are meagre. If Titus is not uncured then Titus is meagre. All uncured, meagre people are verrucose. If someone is mexican and not rackety then they are not verrucose. Leda is rackety.", "logic": "\nMexican(amabelle)\nUncured(amabelle)\nnot Coeliac(amabelle)\nnot Coeliac(kirstin)\nRackety(kirstin)\nClubbable(leda)\nUncured(leda)\nMeagre(titus)\nCoeliac(titus)\nnot Rackety(titus)\nforall x (Uncured(x) and Clubbable(x) -> Rackety(x))\nClubbable(kirstin) -> Meagre(kirstin)\nforall x (Rackety(x) -> Meagre(x))\nnot Uncured(titus) -> Meagre(titus)\nforall x (Uncured(x) and Meagre(x) -> Verrucose(x))\nforall x (Mexican(x) and not Rackety(x) -> not Verrucose(x))\n\nRackety(leda)\n\nUncured(leda) and Clubbable(leda) and forall x (Uncured(x) and Clubbable(x) -> Rackety(x)) -> therefore Rackety(leda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Evangelin is muggy. Evangelin is developed. Evangelin is not gratifying. Miquela is not gratifying. Miquela is tarry. Tanny is unrivalled. Tanny is developed. Shoshie is limacoid. Shoshie is gratifying. Shoshie is not tarry. If someone is developed and unrivalled then they are tarry. If Miquela is unrivalled then Miquela is limacoid. White people are limacoid. If Shoshie is not developed then Shoshie is limacoid. All developed, limacoid people are debased. If someone is muggy and not tarry then they are not debased. Tanny is not tarry.", "logic": "\nMuggy(evangelin)\nDeveloped(evangelin)\nnot Gratifying(evangelin)\nnot Gratifying(miquela)\nTarry(miquela)\nUnrivalled(tanny)\nDeveloped(tanny)\nLimacoid(shoshie)\nGratifying(shoshie)\nnot Tarry(shoshie)\nforall x (Developed(x) and Unrivalled(x) -> Tarry(x))\nUnrivalled(miquela) -> Limacoid(miquela)\nforall x (Tarry(x) -> Limacoid(x))\nnot Developed(shoshie) -> Limacoid(shoshie)\nforall x (Developed(x) and Limacoid(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Muggy(x) and not Tarry(x) -> not Debased(x))\n\nnot Tarry(tanny)\n\nDeveloped(tanny) and Unrivalled(tanny) and forall x (Developed(x) and Unrivalled(x) -> Tarry(x)) -> therefore Tarry(tanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Lem is aculeate. Lem is inured. Lem is not renewed. Forbes is not renewed. Forbes is brushed. Wenda is meandering. Wenda is inured. Ivan is accessible. Ivan is renewed. Ivan is not brushed. If someone is inured and meandering then they are brushed. If Forbes is meandering then Forbes is accessible. White people are accessible. If Ivan is not inured then Ivan is accessible. All inured, accessible people are tortured. If someone is aculeate and not brushed then they are not tortured. Wenda is accessible.", "logic": "\nAculeate(lem)\nInured(lem)\nnot Renewed(lem)\nnot Renewed(forbes)\nBrushed(forbes)\nMeandering(wenda)\nInured(wenda)\nAccessible(ivan)\nRenewed(ivan)\nnot Brushed(ivan)\nforall x (Inured(x) and Meandering(x) -> Brushed(x))\nMeandering(forbes) -> Accessible(forbes)\nforall x (Brushed(x) -> Accessible(x))\nnot Inured(ivan) -> Accessible(ivan)\nforall x (Inured(x) and Accessible(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Aculeate(x) and not Brushed(x) -> not Tortured(x))\n\nAccessible(wenda)\n\nInured(wenda) and Meandering(wenda) and forall x (Inured(x) and Meandering(x) -> Brushed(x)) -> therefore Brushed(wenda) Brushed(wenda) and forall x (Brushed(x) -> Accessible(x)) -> therefore Accessible(wenda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Iris is gladsome. Iris is reticulate. Iris is not mesozoic. Jolene is not mesozoic. Jolene is subhuman. Sebastien is raddled. Sebastien is reticulate. Bruno is ignorant. Bruno is mesozoic. Bruno is not subhuman. If someone is reticulate and raddled then they are subhuman. If Jolene is raddled then Jolene is ignorant. White people are ignorant. If Bruno is not reticulate then Bruno is ignorant. All reticulate, ignorant people are toneless. If someone is gladsome and not subhuman then they are not toneless. Sebastien is not ignorant.", "logic": "\nGladsome(iris)\nReticulate(iris)\nnot Mesozoic(iris)\nnot Mesozoic(jolene)\nSubhuman(jolene)\nRaddled(sebastien)\nReticulate(sebastien)\nIgnorant(bruno)\nMesozoic(bruno)\nnot Subhuman(bruno)\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and Raddled(x) -> Subhuman(x))\nRaddled(jolene) -> Ignorant(jolene)\nforall x (Subhuman(x) -> Ignorant(x))\nnot Reticulate(bruno) -> Ignorant(bruno)\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and Ignorant(x) -> Toneless(x))\nforall x (Gladsome(x) and not Subhuman(x) -> not Toneless(x))\n\nnot Ignorant(sebastien)\n\nReticulate(sebastien) and Raddled(sebastien) and forall x (Reticulate(x) and Raddled(x) -> Subhuman(x)) -> therefore Subhuman(sebastien) Subhuman(sebastien) and forall x (Subhuman(x) -> Ignorant(x)) -> therefore Ignorant(sebastien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Reena is exposed. Reena is disposed. Reena is not deafened. Krystal is not deafened. Krystal is laciniate. Marlena is semirigid. Marlena is disposed. Bessy is molecular. Bessy is deafened. Bessy is not laciniate. If someone is disposed and semirigid then they are laciniate. If Krystal is semirigid then Krystal is molecular. White people are molecular. If Bessy is not disposed then Bessy is molecular. All disposed, molecular people are ubiquitous. If someone is exposed and not laciniate then they are not ubiquitous. Marlena is ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nExposed(reena)\nDisposed(reena)\nnot Deafened(reena)\nnot Deafened(krystal)\nLaciniate(krystal)\nSemirigid(marlena)\nDisposed(marlena)\nMolecular(bessy)\nDeafened(bessy)\nnot Laciniate(bessy)\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nSemirigid(krystal) -> Molecular(krystal)\nforall x (Laciniate(x) -> Molecular(x))\nnot Disposed(bessy) -> Molecular(bessy)\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Molecular(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) and not Laciniate(x) -> not Ubiquitous(x))\n\nUbiquitous(marlena)\n\nDisposed(marlena) and Semirigid(marlena) and forall x (Disposed(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Laciniate(x)) -> therefore Laciniate(marlena) Laciniate(marlena) and forall x (Laciniate(x) -> Molecular(x)) -> therefore Molecular(marlena) Disposed(marlena) and Molecular(marlena) and forall x (Disposed(x) and Molecular(x) -> Ubiquitous(x)) -> therefore Ubiquitous(marlena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Elayne is detested. Elayne is anagogic. Elayne is not antimonial. Caty is not antimonial. Caty is healthy. Fyodor is unlamented. Fyodor is anagogic. Susie is anurous. Susie is antimonial. Susie is not healthy. If someone is anagogic and unlamented then they are healthy. If Caty is unlamented then Caty is anurous. White people are anurous. If Susie is not anagogic then Susie is anurous. All anagogic, anurous people are dandy. If someone is detested and not healthy then they are not dandy. Fyodor is not dandy.", "logic": "\nDetested(elayne)\nAnagogic(elayne)\nnot Antimonial(elayne)\nnot Antimonial(caty)\nHealthy(caty)\nUnlamented(fyodor)\nAnagogic(fyodor)\nAnurous(susie)\nAntimonial(susie)\nnot Healthy(susie)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Unlamented(x) -> Healthy(x))\nUnlamented(caty) -> Anurous(caty)\nforall x (Healthy(x) -> Anurous(x))\nnot Anagogic(susie) -> Anurous(susie)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Anurous(x) -> Dandy(x))\nforall x (Detested(x) and not Healthy(x) -> not Dandy(x))\n\nnot Dandy(fyodor)\n\nAnagogic(fyodor) and Unlamented(fyodor) and forall x (Anagogic(x) and Unlamented(x) -> Healthy(x)) -> therefore Healthy(fyodor) Healthy(fyodor) and forall x (Healthy(x) -> Anurous(x)) -> therefore Anurous(fyodor) Anagogic(fyodor) and Anurous(fyodor) and forall x (Anagogic(x) and Anurous(x) -> Dandy(x)) -> therefore Dandy(fyodor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Wilhelm is malignant. Wilhelm is disastrous. Wilhelm is not shallow. Ewan is not shallow. Ewan is larger. Tann is obsequious. Tann is disastrous. Hilde is patented. Hilde is shallow. Hilde is not larger. If someone is disastrous and obsequious then they are larger. If Ewan is obsequious then Ewan is patented. White people are patented. If Hilde is not disastrous then Hilde is patented. All disastrous, patented people are graceless. If someone is malignant and not larger then they are not graceless. Wilhelm is not larger.", "logic": "\nMalignant(wilhelm)\nDisastrous(wilhelm)\nnot Shallow(wilhelm)\nnot Shallow(ewan)\nLarger(ewan)\nObsequious(tann)\nDisastrous(tann)\nPatented(hilde)\nShallow(hilde)\nnot Larger(hilde)\nforall x (Disastrous(x) and Obsequious(x) -> Larger(x))\nObsequious(ewan) -> Patented(ewan)\nforall x (Larger(x) -> Patented(x))\nnot Disastrous(hilde) -> Patented(hilde)\nforall x (Disastrous(x) and Patented(x) -> Graceless(x))\nforall x (Malignant(x) and not Larger(x) -> not Graceless(x))\n\nnot Larger(wilhelm)\n\nforall x (Disastrous(x) and Obsequious(x) -> Larger(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Keslie is squirting. Keslie is backstairs. Keslie is not saltish. Anthe is not saltish. Anthe is concurrent. Vin is ordinary. Vin is backstairs. Cristi is tangy. Cristi is saltish. Cristi is not concurrent. If someone is backstairs and ordinary then they are concurrent. If Anthe is ordinary then Anthe is tangy. White people are tangy. If Cristi is not backstairs then Cristi is tangy. All backstairs, tangy people are forged. If someone is squirting and not concurrent then they are not forged. Anthe is forged.", "logic": "\nSquirting(keslie)\nBackstairs(keslie)\nnot Saltish(keslie)\nnot Saltish(anthe)\nConcurrent(anthe)\nOrdinary(vin)\nBackstairs(vin)\nTangy(cristi)\nSaltish(cristi)\nnot Concurrent(cristi)\nforall x (Backstairs(x) and Ordinary(x) -> Concurrent(x))\nOrdinary(anthe) -> Tangy(anthe)\nforall x (Concurrent(x) -> Tangy(x))\nnot Backstairs(cristi) -> Tangy(cristi)\nforall x (Backstairs(x) and Tangy(x) -> Forged(x))\nforall x (Squirting(x) and not Concurrent(x) -> not Forged(x))\n\nForged(anthe)\n\nforall x (Backstairs(x) and Tangy(x) -> Forged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Mabelle is validated. Mabelle is primed. Mabelle is not seaworthy. Taddeo is not seaworthy. Taddeo is thracian. Giles is adaptable. Giles is primed. Benjy is liveried. Benjy is seaworthy. Benjy is not thracian. If someone is primed and adaptable then they are thracian. If Taddeo is adaptable then Taddeo is liveried. White people are liveried. If Benjy is not primed then Benjy is liveried. All primed, liveried people are textbook. If someone is validated and not thracian then they are not textbook. Mabelle is not liveried.", "logic": "\nValidated(mabelle)\nPrimed(mabelle)\nnot Seaworthy(mabelle)\nnot Seaworthy(taddeo)\nThracian(taddeo)\nAdaptable(giles)\nPrimed(giles)\nLiveried(benjy)\nSeaworthy(benjy)\nnot Thracian(benjy)\nforall x (Primed(x) and Adaptable(x) -> Thracian(x))\nAdaptable(taddeo) -> Liveried(taddeo)\nforall x (Thracian(x) -> Liveried(x))\nnot Primed(benjy) -> Liveried(benjy)\nforall x (Primed(x) and Liveried(x) -> Textbook(x))\nforall x (Validated(x) and not Thracian(x) -> not Textbook(x))\n\nnot Liveried(mabelle)\n\nforall x (Thracian(x) -> Liveried(x)) <- forall x (Primed(x) and Adaptable(x) -> Thracian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Blakeley is gossipy. Blakeley is bonelike. Blakeley is not orchestral. Fortuna is not orchestral. Fortuna is uncaring. Nalani is meaty. Nalani is bonelike. Shurlocke is bifurcate. Shurlocke is orchestral. Shurlocke is not uncaring. If someone is bonelike and meaty then they are uncaring. If Fortuna is meaty then Fortuna is bifurcate. White people are bifurcate. If Shurlocke is not bonelike then Shurlocke is bifurcate. All bonelike, bifurcate people are acidulent. If someone is gossipy and not uncaring then they are not acidulent. Blakeley is acidulent.", "logic": "\nGossipy(blakeley)\nBonelike(blakeley)\nnot Orchestral(blakeley)\nnot Orchestral(fortuna)\nUncaring(fortuna)\nMeaty(nalani)\nBonelike(nalani)\nBifurcate(shurlocke)\nOrchestral(shurlocke)\nnot Uncaring(shurlocke)\nforall x (Bonelike(x) and Meaty(x) -> Uncaring(x))\nMeaty(fortuna) -> Bifurcate(fortuna)\nforall x (Uncaring(x) -> Bifurcate(x))\nnot Bonelike(shurlocke) -> Bifurcate(shurlocke)\nforall x (Bonelike(x) and Bifurcate(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Gossipy(x) and not Uncaring(x) -> not Acidulent(x))\n\nAcidulent(blakeley)\n\nforall x (Bonelike(x) and Bifurcate(x) -> Acidulent(x)) <- forall x (Uncaring(x) -> Bifurcate(x)) <- forall x (Bonelike(x) and Meaty(x) -> Uncaring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Weston is oldish. Weston is alopecic. Weston is not zillion. Ardra is not zillion. Ardra is reasoning. Orsola is wicked. Orsola is alopecic. Penelopa is irritative. Penelopa is zillion. Penelopa is not reasoning. If someone is alopecic and wicked then they are reasoning. If Ardra is wicked then Ardra is irritative. White people are irritative. If Penelopa is not alopecic then Penelopa is irritative. All alopecic, irritative people are weather. If someone is oldish and not reasoning then they are not weather. Ardra is not wicked.", "logic": "\nOldish(weston)\nAlopecic(weston)\nnot Zillion(weston)\nnot Zillion(ardra)\nReasoning(ardra)\nWicked(orsola)\nAlopecic(orsola)\nIrritative(penelopa)\nZillion(penelopa)\nnot Reasoning(penelopa)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and Wicked(x) -> Reasoning(x))\nWicked(ardra) -> Irritative(ardra)\nforall x (Reasoning(x) -> Irritative(x))\nnot Alopecic(penelopa) -> Irritative(penelopa)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and Irritative(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) and not Reasoning(x) -> not Weather(x))\n\nnot Wicked(ardra)\n\nnot Wicked(ardra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Mathilde is related. Mathilde is peppery. Mathilde is not chary. Sara is not chary. Sara is alone. Antonina is homologous. Antonina is peppery. Willis is undigested. Willis is chary. Willis is not alone. If someone is peppery and homologous then they are alone. If Sara is homologous then Sara is undigested. White people are undigested. If Willis is not peppery then Willis is undigested. All peppery, undigested people are lotic. If someone is related and not alone then they are not lotic. Antonina is chary.", "logic": "\nRelated(mathilde)\nPeppery(mathilde)\nnot Chary(mathilde)\nnot Chary(sara)\nAlone(sara)\nHomologous(antonina)\nPeppery(antonina)\nUndigested(willis)\nChary(willis)\nnot Alone(willis)\nforall x (Peppery(x) and Homologous(x) -> Alone(x))\nHomologous(sara) -> Undigested(sara)\nforall x (Alone(x) -> Undigested(x))\nnot Peppery(willis) -> Undigested(willis)\nforall x (Peppery(x) and Undigested(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Related(x) and not Alone(x) -> not Lotic(x))\n\nChary(antonina)\n\nChary(antonina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Irwin is lowbrow. Irwin is oddish. Irwin is not debonnaire. Cissie is not debonnaire. Cissie is arborary. Tana is nubbly. Tana is oddish. Gabriell is large. Gabriell is debonnaire. Gabriell is not arborary. If someone is oddish and nubbly then they are arborary. If Cissie is nubbly then Cissie is large. White people are large. If Gabriell is not oddish then Gabriell is large. All oddish, large people are larval. If someone is lowbrow and not arborary then they are not larval. Gabriell is not lowbrow.", "logic": "\nLowbrow(irwin)\nOddish(irwin)\nnot Debonnaire(irwin)\nnot Debonnaire(cissie)\nArborary(cissie)\nNubbly(tana)\nOddish(tana)\nLarge(gabriell)\nDebonnaire(gabriell)\nnot Arborary(gabriell)\nforall x (Oddish(x) and Nubbly(x) -> Arborary(x))\nNubbly(cissie) -> Large(cissie)\nforall x (Arborary(x) -> Large(x))\nnot Oddish(gabriell) -> Large(gabriell)\nforall x (Oddish(x) and Large(x) -> Larval(x))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) and not Arborary(x) -> not Larval(x))\n\nnot Lowbrow(gabriell)\n\nnot Lowbrow(gabriell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Danielle is clownlike. Danielle is gruesome. Danielle is not droll. Gwendolyn is not droll. Gwendolyn is sonsy. Hamid is viatical. Hamid is gruesome. Franciska is monogynic. Franciska is droll. Franciska is not sonsy. If someone is gruesome and viatical then they are sonsy. If Gwendolyn is viatical then Gwendolyn is monogynic. White people are monogynic. If Franciska is not gruesome then Franciska is monogynic. All gruesome, monogynic people are tawny. If someone is clownlike and not sonsy then they are not tawny. Franciska is gruesome.", "logic": "\nClownlike(danielle)\nGruesome(danielle)\nnot Droll(danielle)\nnot Droll(gwendolyn)\nSonsy(gwendolyn)\nViatical(hamid)\nGruesome(hamid)\nMonogynic(franciska)\nDroll(franciska)\nnot Sonsy(franciska)\nforall x (Gruesome(x) and Viatical(x) -> Sonsy(x))\nViatical(gwendolyn) -> Monogynic(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Sonsy(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nnot Gruesome(franciska) -> Monogynic(franciska)\nforall x (Gruesome(x) and Monogynic(x) -> Tawny(x))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) and not Sonsy(x) -> not Tawny(x))\n\nGruesome(franciska)\n\nGruesome(franciska) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "The tito commutate the brent. The brent is respective. The brent commutate the tito. The brent commutate the benita. The brent garden the tito. The brent garden the benita. The brent ensconce the benita. The benita is suctorial. The benita garden the tito. The benita ensconce the tito. If something ensconce the tito then the tito ensconce the benita. If something garden the tito and the tito ensconce the benita then the tito ensconce the brent. If the brent commutate the tito and the tito garden the brent then the tito commutate the benita. If the tito garden the benita then the tito is suctorial. If something ensconce the brent then the brent ensconce the tito. If something is respective and fatless then it garden the brent. The tito commutate the brent.", "logic": "\nCommutate(tito, brent)\nRespective(brent)\nCommutate(brent, tito)\nCommutate(brent, benita)\nGarden(brent, tito)\nGarden(brent, benita)\nEnsconce(brent, benita)\nSuctorial(benita)\nGarden(benita, tito)\nEnsconce(benita, tito)\nforall x (Ensconce(x, tito) -> Ensconce(tito, benita))\nforall x (Garden(x, tito) and Ensconce(tito, benita) -> Ensconce(tito, brent))\nCommutate(brent, tito) and Garden(tito, brent) -> Commutate(tito, benita)\nGarden(tito, benita) -> Suctorial(tito)\nforall x (Ensconce(x, brent) -> Ensconce(brent, tito))\nforall x (Respective(x) and Fatless(x) -> Garden(x, brent))\n\nCommutate(tito, brent)\n\ntherefore Commutate(tito, brent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The frank manipulate the sianna. The sianna is humble. The sianna manipulate the frank. The sianna manipulate the catarina. The sianna wind the frank. The sianna wind the catarina. The sianna wreathe the catarina. The catarina is panoptic. The catarina wind the frank. The catarina wreathe the frank. If something wreathe the frank then the frank wreathe the catarina. If something wind the frank and the frank wreathe the catarina then the frank wreathe the sianna. If the sianna manipulate the frank and the frank wind the sianna then the frank manipulate the catarina. If the frank wind the catarina then the frank is panoptic. If something wreathe the sianna then the sianna wreathe the frank. If something is humble and cubiform then it wind the sianna. The sianna does not visit the catarina.", "logic": "\nManipulate(frank, sianna)\nHumble(sianna)\nManipulate(sianna, frank)\nManipulate(sianna, catarina)\nWind(sianna, frank)\nWind(sianna, catarina)\nWreathe(sianna, catarina)\nPanoptic(catarina)\nWind(catarina, frank)\nWreathe(catarina, frank)\nforall x (Wreathe(x, frank) -> Wreathe(frank, catarina))\nforall x (Wind(x, frank) and Wreathe(frank, catarina) -> Wreathe(frank, sianna))\nManipulate(sianna, frank) and Wind(frank, sianna) -> Manipulate(frank, catarina)\nWind(frank, catarina) -> Panoptic(frank)\nforall x (Wreathe(x, sianna) -> Wreathe(sianna, frank))\nforall x (Humble(x) and Cubiform(x) -> Wind(x, sianna))\n\nnot Wreathe(sianna, catarina)\n\ntherefore Wreathe(sianna, catarina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The ernst alienate the arleyne. The arleyne is emboldened. The arleyne alienate the ernst. The arleyne alienate the clarette. The arleyne hate the ernst. The arleyne hate the clarette. The arleyne disgorge the clarette. The clarette is continuous. The clarette hate the ernst. The clarette disgorge the ernst. If something disgorge the ernst then the ernst disgorge the clarette. If something hate the ernst and the ernst disgorge the clarette then the ernst disgorge the arleyne. If the arleyne alienate the ernst and the ernst hate the arleyne then the ernst alienate the clarette. If the ernst hate the clarette then the ernst is continuous. If something disgorge the arleyne then the arleyne disgorge the ernst. If something is emboldened and shrewd then it hate the arleyne. The ernst disgorge the clarette.", "logic": "\nAlienate(ernst, arleyne)\nEmboldened(arleyne)\nAlienate(arleyne, ernst)\nAlienate(arleyne, clarette)\nHate(arleyne, ernst)\nHate(arleyne, clarette)\nDisgorge(arleyne, clarette)\nContinuous(clarette)\nHate(clarette, ernst)\nDisgorge(clarette, ernst)\nforall x (Disgorge(x, ernst) -> Disgorge(ernst, clarette))\nforall x (Hate(x, ernst) and Disgorge(ernst, clarette) -> Disgorge(ernst, arleyne))\nAlienate(arleyne, ernst) and Hate(ernst, arleyne) -> Alienate(ernst, clarette)\nHate(ernst, clarette) -> Continuous(ernst)\nforall x (Disgorge(x, arleyne) -> Disgorge(arleyne, ernst))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and Shrewd(x) -> Hate(x, arleyne))\n\nDisgorge(ernst, clarette)\n\nDisgorge(clarette, ernst) and forall x (Disgorge(x, ernst) -> Disgorge(ernst, clarette)) -> therefore Disgorge(ernst, clarette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The petunia tink the idelle. The idelle is bilingual. The idelle tink the petunia. The idelle tink the hale. The idelle nutrify the petunia. The idelle nutrify the hale. The idelle impanel the hale. The hale is grudging. The hale nutrify the petunia. The hale impanel the petunia. If something impanel the petunia then the petunia impanel the hale. If something nutrify the petunia and the petunia impanel the hale then the petunia impanel the idelle. If the idelle tink the petunia and the petunia nutrify the idelle then the petunia tink the hale. If the petunia nutrify the hale then the petunia is grudging. If something impanel the idelle then the idelle impanel the petunia. If something is bilingual and abstruse then it nutrify the idelle. The petunia does not visit the hale.", "logic": "\nTink(petunia, idelle)\nBilingual(idelle)\nTink(idelle, petunia)\nTink(idelle, hale)\nNutrify(idelle, petunia)\nNutrify(idelle, hale)\nImpanel(idelle, hale)\nGrudging(hale)\nNutrify(hale, petunia)\nImpanel(hale, petunia)\nforall x (Impanel(x, petunia) -> Impanel(petunia, hale))\nforall x (Nutrify(x, petunia) and Impanel(petunia, hale) -> Impanel(petunia, idelle))\nTink(idelle, petunia) and Nutrify(petunia, idelle) -> Tink(petunia, hale)\nNutrify(petunia, hale) -> Grudging(petunia)\nforall x (Impanel(x, idelle) -> Impanel(idelle, petunia))\nforall x (Bilingual(x) and Abstruse(x) -> Nutrify(x, idelle))\n\nnot Impanel(petunia, hale)\n\nImpanel(hale, petunia) and forall x (Impanel(x, petunia) -> Impanel(petunia, hale)) -> therefore Impanel(petunia, hale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The alain waver the sela. The sela is phlegmy. The sela waver the alain. The sela waver the gabriello. The sela aromatize the alain. The sela aromatize the gabriello. The sela clamber the gabriello. The gabriello is neighborly. The gabriello aromatize the alain. The gabriello clamber the alain. If something clamber the alain then the alain clamber the gabriello. If something aromatize the alain and the alain clamber the gabriello then the alain clamber the sela. If the sela waver the alain and the alain aromatize the sela then the alain waver the gabriello. If the alain aromatize the gabriello then the alain is neighborly. If something clamber the sela then the sela clamber the alain. If something is phlegmy and chaste then it aromatize the sela. The alain clamber the sela.", "logic": "\nWaver(alain, sela)\nPhlegmy(sela)\nWaver(sela, alain)\nWaver(sela, gabriello)\nAromatize(sela, alain)\nAromatize(sela, gabriello)\nClamber(sela, gabriello)\nNeighborly(gabriello)\nAromatize(gabriello, alain)\nClamber(gabriello, alain)\nforall x (Clamber(x, alain) -> Clamber(alain, gabriello))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, alain) and Clamber(alain, gabriello) -> Clamber(alain, sela))\nWaver(sela, alain) and Aromatize(alain, sela) -> Waver(alain, gabriello)\nAromatize(alain, gabriello) -> Neighborly(alain)\nforall x (Clamber(x, sela) -> Clamber(sela, alain))\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) and Chaste(x) -> Aromatize(x, sela))\n\nClamber(alain, sela)\n\nClamber(gabriello, alain) and forall x (Clamber(x, alain) -> Clamber(alain, gabriello)) -> therefore Clamber(alain, gabriello) Aromatize(sela, alain) and Clamber(alain, gabriello) and forall x (Aromatize(x, alain) and Clamber(alain, gabriello) -> Clamber(alain, sela)) -> therefore Clamber(alain, sela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The darleen narcotize the alyse. The alyse is curling. The alyse narcotize the darleen. The alyse narcotize the darlene. The alyse brecciate the darleen. The alyse brecciate the darlene. The alyse burnish the darlene. The darlene is adorable. The darlene brecciate the darleen. The darlene burnish the darleen. If something burnish the darleen then the darleen burnish the darlene. If something brecciate the darleen and the darleen burnish the darlene then the darleen burnish the alyse. If the alyse narcotize the darleen and the darleen brecciate the alyse then the darleen narcotize the darlene. If the darleen brecciate the darlene then the darleen is adorable. If something burnish the alyse then the alyse burnish the darleen. If something is curling and conceited then it brecciate the alyse. The darleen does not visit the alyse.", "logic": "\nNarcotize(darleen, alyse)\nCurling(alyse)\nNarcotize(alyse, darleen)\nNarcotize(alyse, darlene)\nBrecciate(alyse, darleen)\nBrecciate(alyse, darlene)\nBurnish(alyse, darlene)\nAdorable(darlene)\nBrecciate(darlene, darleen)\nBurnish(darlene, darleen)\nforall x (Burnish(x, darleen) -> Burnish(darleen, darlene))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, darleen) and Burnish(darleen, darlene) -> Burnish(darleen, alyse))\nNarcotize(alyse, darleen) and Brecciate(darleen, alyse) -> Narcotize(darleen, darlene)\nBrecciate(darleen, darlene) -> Adorable(darleen)\nforall x (Burnish(x, alyse) -> Burnish(alyse, darleen))\nforall x (Curling(x) and Conceited(x) -> Brecciate(x, alyse))\n\nnot Burnish(darleen, alyse)\n\nBurnish(darlene, darleen) and forall x (Burnish(x, darleen) -> Burnish(darleen, darlene)) -> therefore Burnish(darleen, darlene) Brecciate(alyse, darleen) and Burnish(darleen, darlene) and forall x (Brecciate(x, darleen) and Burnish(darleen, darlene) -> Burnish(darleen, alyse)) -> therefore Burnish(darleen, alyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The donn rise the creighton. The creighton is earless. The creighton rise the donn. The creighton rise the joao. The creighton grin the donn. The creighton grin the joao. The creighton welt the joao. The joao is cuspidated. The joao grin the donn. The joao welt the donn. If something welt the donn then the donn welt the joao. If something grin the donn and the donn welt the joao then the donn welt the creighton. If the creighton rise the donn and the donn grin the creighton then the donn rise the joao. If the donn grin the joao then the donn is cuspidated. If something welt the creighton then the creighton welt the donn. If something is earless and ripened then it grin the creighton. The creighton welt the donn.", "logic": "\nRise(donn, creighton)\nEarless(creighton)\nRise(creighton, donn)\nRise(creighton, joao)\nGrin(creighton, donn)\nGrin(creighton, joao)\nWelt(creighton, joao)\nCuspidated(joao)\nGrin(joao, donn)\nWelt(joao, donn)\nforall x (Welt(x, donn) -> Welt(donn, joao))\nforall x (Grin(x, donn) and Welt(donn, joao) -> Welt(donn, creighton))\nRise(creighton, donn) and Grin(donn, creighton) -> Rise(donn, joao)\nGrin(donn, joao) -> Cuspidated(donn)\nforall x (Welt(x, creighton) -> Welt(creighton, donn))\nforall x (Earless(x) and Ripened(x) -> Grin(x, creighton))\n\nWelt(creighton, donn)\n\nWelt(joao, donn) and forall x (Welt(x, donn) -> Welt(donn, joao)) -> therefore Welt(donn, joao) Grin(creighton, donn) and Welt(donn, joao) and forall x (Grin(x, donn) and Welt(donn, joao) -> Welt(donn, creighton)) -> therefore Welt(donn, creighton) Welt(donn, creighton) and forall x (Welt(x, creighton) -> Welt(creighton, donn)) -> therefore Welt(creighton, donn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The timmy catabolise the maurise. The maurise is unwoven. The maurise catabolise the timmy. The maurise catabolise the angelita. The maurise odorize the timmy. The maurise odorize the angelita. The maurise pollenate the angelita. The angelita is subjugable. The angelita odorize the timmy. The angelita pollenate the timmy. If something pollenate the timmy then the timmy pollenate the angelita. If something odorize the timmy and the timmy pollenate the angelita then the timmy pollenate the maurise. If the maurise catabolise the timmy and the timmy odorize the maurise then the timmy catabolise the angelita. If the timmy odorize the angelita then the timmy is subjugable. If something pollenate the maurise then the maurise pollenate the timmy. If something is unwoven and paniculate then it odorize the maurise. The maurise does not visit the timmy.", "logic": "\nCatabolise(timmy, maurise)\nUnwoven(maurise)\nCatabolise(maurise, timmy)\nCatabolise(maurise, angelita)\nOdorize(maurise, timmy)\nOdorize(maurise, angelita)\nPollenate(maurise, angelita)\nSubjugable(angelita)\nOdorize(angelita, timmy)\nPollenate(angelita, timmy)\nforall x (Pollenate(x, timmy) -> Pollenate(timmy, angelita))\nforall x (Odorize(x, timmy) and Pollenate(timmy, angelita) -> Pollenate(timmy, maurise))\nCatabolise(maurise, timmy) and Odorize(timmy, maurise) -> Catabolise(timmy, angelita)\nOdorize(timmy, angelita) -> Subjugable(timmy)\nforall x (Pollenate(x, maurise) -> Pollenate(maurise, timmy))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Paniculate(x) -> Odorize(x, maurise))\n\nnot Pollenate(maurise, timmy)\n\nPollenate(angelita, timmy) and forall x (Pollenate(x, timmy) -> Pollenate(timmy, angelita)) -> therefore Pollenate(timmy, angelita) Odorize(maurise, timmy) and Pollenate(timmy, angelita) and forall x (Odorize(x, timmy) and Pollenate(timmy, angelita) -> Pollenate(timmy, maurise)) -> therefore Pollenate(timmy, maurise) Pollenate(timmy, maurise) and forall x (Pollenate(x, maurise) -> Pollenate(maurise, timmy)) -> therefore Pollenate(maurise, timmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The janey bulletin the brewster. The brewster is criminal. The brewster bulletin the janey. The brewster bulletin the jenni. The brewster spirt the janey. The brewster spirt the jenni. The brewster tittivate the jenni. The jenni is admittible. The jenni spirt the janey. The jenni tittivate the janey. If something tittivate the janey then the janey tittivate the jenni. If something spirt the janey and the janey tittivate the jenni then the janey tittivate the brewster. If the brewster bulletin the janey and the janey spirt the brewster then the janey bulletin the jenni. If the janey spirt the jenni then the janey is admittible. If something tittivate the brewster then the brewster tittivate the janey. If something is criminal and lubberly then it spirt the brewster. The janey does not need the jenni.", "logic": "\nBulletin(janey, brewster)\nCriminal(brewster)\nBulletin(brewster, janey)\nBulletin(brewster, jenni)\nSpirt(brewster, janey)\nSpirt(brewster, jenni)\nTittivate(brewster, jenni)\nAdmittible(jenni)\nSpirt(jenni, janey)\nTittivate(jenni, janey)\nforall x (Tittivate(x, janey) -> Tittivate(janey, jenni))\nforall x (Spirt(x, janey) and Tittivate(janey, jenni) -> Tittivate(janey, brewster))\nBulletin(brewster, janey) and Spirt(janey, brewster) -> Bulletin(janey, jenni)\nSpirt(janey, jenni) -> Admittible(janey)\nforall x (Tittivate(x, brewster) -> Tittivate(brewster, janey))\nforall x (Criminal(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Spirt(x, brewster))\n\nnot Bulletin(janey, jenni)\n\nBulletin(brewster, janey) and Spirt(janey, brewster) -> Bulletin(janey, jenni) <- forall x (Criminal(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Spirt(x, brewster)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The chris warehouse the robinett. The robinett is backhanded. The robinett warehouse the chris. The robinett warehouse the phil. The robinett dimension the chris. The robinett dimension the phil. The robinett clop the phil. The phil is uncurved. The phil dimension the chris. The phil clop the chris. If something clop the chris then the chris clop the phil. If something dimension the chris and the chris clop the phil then the chris clop the robinett. If the robinett warehouse the chris and the chris dimension the robinett then the chris warehouse the phil. If the chris dimension the phil then the chris is uncurved. If something clop the robinett then the robinett clop the chris. If something is backhanded and cubic then it dimension the robinett. The phil dimension the robinett.", "logic": "\nWarehouse(chris, robinett)\nBackhanded(robinett)\nWarehouse(robinett, chris)\nWarehouse(robinett, phil)\nDimension(robinett, chris)\nDimension(robinett, phil)\nClop(robinett, phil)\nUncurved(phil)\nDimension(phil, chris)\nClop(phil, chris)\nforall x (Clop(x, chris) -> Clop(chris, phil))\nforall x (Dimension(x, chris) and Clop(chris, phil) -> Clop(chris, robinett))\nWarehouse(robinett, chris) and Dimension(chris, robinett) -> Warehouse(chris, phil)\nDimension(chris, phil) -> Uncurved(chris)\nforall x (Clop(x, robinett) -> Clop(robinett, chris))\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Cubic(x) -> Dimension(x, robinett))\n\nDimension(phil, robinett)\n\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Cubic(x) -> Dimension(x, robinett)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The cynthie murk the quintin. The quintin is eclectic. The quintin murk the cynthie. The quintin murk the lura. The quintin stress the cynthie. The quintin stress the lura. The quintin undock the lura. The lura is boeotian. The lura stress the cynthie. The lura undock the cynthie. If something undock the cynthie then the cynthie undock the lura. If something stress the cynthie and the cynthie undock the lura then the cynthie undock the quintin. If the quintin murk the cynthie and the cynthie stress the quintin then the cynthie murk the lura. If the cynthie stress the lura then the cynthie is boeotian. If something undock the quintin then the quintin undock the cynthie. If something is eclectic and filar then it stress the quintin. The cynthie does not see the quintin.", "logic": "\nMurk(cynthie, quintin)\nEclectic(quintin)\nMurk(quintin, cynthie)\nMurk(quintin, lura)\nStress(quintin, cynthie)\nStress(quintin, lura)\nUndock(quintin, lura)\nBoeotian(lura)\nStress(lura, cynthie)\nUndock(lura, cynthie)\nforall x (Undock(x, cynthie) -> Undock(cynthie, lura))\nforall x (Stress(x, cynthie) and Undock(cynthie, lura) -> Undock(cynthie, quintin))\nMurk(quintin, cynthie) and Stress(cynthie, quintin) -> Murk(cynthie, lura)\nStress(cynthie, lura) -> Boeotian(cynthie)\nforall x (Undock(x, quintin) -> Undock(quintin, cynthie))\nforall x (Eclectic(x) and Filar(x) -> Stress(x, quintin))\n\nnot Stress(cynthie, quintin)\n\nforall x (Eclectic(x) and Filar(x) -> Stress(x, quintin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The darth remove the lanny. The lanny is unenclosed. The lanny remove the darth. The lanny remove the iormina. The lanny pussyfoot the darth. The lanny pussyfoot the iormina. The lanny admire the iormina. The iormina is bahraini. The iormina pussyfoot the darth. The iormina admire the darth. If something admire the darth then the darth admire the iormina. If something pussyfoot the darth and the darth admire the iormina then the darth admire the lanny. If the lanny remove the darth and the darth pussyfoot the lanny then the darth remove the iormina. If the darth pussyfoot the iormina then the darth is bahraini. If something admire the lanny then the lanny admire the darth. If something is unenclosed and overage then it pussyfoot the lanny. The darth is bahraini.", "logic": "\nRemove(darth, lanny)\nUnenclosed(lanny)\nRemove(lanny, darth)\nRemove(lanny, iormina)\nPussyfoot(lanny, darth)\nPussyfoot(lanny, iormina)\nAdmire(lanny, iormina)\nBahraini(iormina)\nPussyfoot(iormina, darth)\nAdmire(iormina, darth)\nforall x (Admire(x, darth) -> Admire(darth, iormina))\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, darth) and Admire(darth, iormina) -> Admire(darth, lanny))\nRemove(lanny, darth) and Pussyfoot(darth, lanny) -> Remove(darth, iormina)\nPussyfoot(darth, iormina) -> Bahraini(darth)\nforall x (Admire(x, lanny) -> Admire(lanny, darth))\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) and Overage(x) -> Pussyfoot(x, lanny))\n\nBahraini(darth)\n\nPussyfoot(darth, iormina) -> Bahraini(darth) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The cathi slabber the gretna. The gretna is spinnbar. The gretna slabber the cathi. The gretna slabber the ceciley. The gretna control the cathi. The gretna control the ceciley. The gretna resign the ceciley. The ceciley is mealy. The ceciley control the cathi. The ceciley resign the cathi. If something resign the cathi then the cathi resign the ceciley. If something control the cathi and the cathi resign the ceciley then the cathi resign the gretna. If the gretna slabber the cathi and the cathi control the gretna then the cathi slabber the ceciley. If the cathi control the ceciley then the cathi is mealy. If something resign the gretna then the gretna resign the cathi. If something is spinnbar and homiletic then it control the gretna. The ceciley is not big.", "logic": "\nSlabber(cathi, gretna)\nSpinnbar(gretna)\nSlabber(gretna, cathi)\nSlabber(gretna, ceciley)\nControl(gretna, cathi)\nControl(gretna, ceciley)\nResign(gretna, ceciley)\nMealy(ceciley)\nControl(ceciley, cathi)\nResign(ceciley, cathi)\nforall x (Resign(x, cathi) -> Resign(cathi, ceciley))\nforall x (Control(x, cathi) and Resign(cathi, ceciley) -> Resign(cathi, gretna))\nSlabber(gretna, cathi) and Control(cathi, gretna) -> Slabber(cathi, ceciley)\nControl(cathi, ceciley) -> Mealy(cathi)\nforall x (Resign(x, gretna) -> Resign(gretna, cathi))\nforall x (Spinnbar(x) and Homiletic(x) -> Control(x, gretna))\n\nnot Big(ceciley)\n\nnot Big(ceciley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The ansley prescribe the brunella. The brunella is lamenting. The brunella prescribe the ansley. The brunella prescribe the mylo. The brunella emaciate the ansley. The brunella emaciate the mylo. The brunella outplay the mylo. The mylo is semirigid. The mylo emaciate the ansley. The mylo outplay the ansley. If something outplay the ansley then the ansley outplay the mylo. If something emaciate the ansley and the ansley outplay the mylo then the ansley outplay the brunella. If the brunella prescribe the ansley and the ansley emaciate the brunella then the ansley prescribe the mylo. If the ansley emaciate the mylo then the ansley is semirigid. If something outplay the brunella then the brunella outplay the ansley. If something is lamenting and stomachal then it emaciate the brunella. The mylo outplay the mylo.", "logic": "\nPrescribe(ansley, brunella)\nLamenting(brunella)\nPrescribe(brunella, ansley)\nPrescribe(brunella, mylo)\nEmaciate(brunella, ansley)\nEmaciate(brunella, mylo)\nOutplay(brunella, mylo)\nSemirigid(mylo)\nEmaciate(mylo, ansley)\nOutplay(mylo, ansley)\nforall x (Outplay(x, ansley) -> Outplay(ansley, mylo))\nforall x (Emaciate(x, ansley) and Outplay(ansley, mylo) -> Outplay(ansley, brunella))\nPrescribe(brunella, ansley) and Emaciate(ansley, brunella) -> Prescribe(ansley, mylo)\nEmaciate(ansley, mylo) -> Semirigid(ansley)\nforall x (Outplay(x, brunella) -> Outplay(brunella, ansley))\nforall x (Lamenting(x) and Stomachal(x) -> Emaciate(x, brunella))\n\nOutplay(mylo, mylo)\n\nOutplay(mylo, mylo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The claudette withdraw the cassandra. The cassandra is deducible. The cassandra withdraw the claudette. The cassandra withdraw the milton. The cassandra overdress the claudette. The cassandra overdress the milton. The cassandra shallow the milton. The milton is unethical. The milton overdress the claudette. The milton shallow the claudette. If something shallow the claudette then the claudette shallow the milton. If something overdress the claudette and the claudette shallow the milton then the claudette shallow the cassandra. If the cassandra withdraw the claudette and the claudette overdress the cassandra then the claudette withdraw the milton. If the claudette overdress the milton then the claudette is unethical. If something shallow the cassandra then the cassandra shallow the claudette. If something is deducible and uptight then it overdress the cassandra. The claudette does not see the claudette.", "logic": "\nWithdraw(claudette, cassandra)\nDeducible(cassandra)\nWithdraw(cassandra, claudette)\nWithdraw(cassandra, milton)\nOverdress(cassandra, claudette)\nOverdress(cassandra, milton)\nShallow(cassandra, milton)\nUnethical(milton)\nOverdress(milton, claudette)\nShallow(milton, claudette)\nforall x (Shallow(x, claudette) -> Shallow(claudette, milton))\nforall x (Overdress(x, claudette) and Shallow(claudette, milton) -> Shallow(claudette, cassandra))\nWithdraw(cassandra, claudette) and Overdress(claudette, cassandra) -> Withdraw(claudette, milton)\nOverdress(claudette, milton) -> Unethical(claudette)\nforall x (Shallow(x, cassandra) -> Shallow(cassandra, claudette))\nforall x (Deducible(x) and Uptight(x) -> Overdress(x, cassandra))\n\nnot Overdress(claudette, claudette)\n\nnot Overdress(claudette, claudette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The shaina copy the lenard. The lenard is lusty. The lenard copy the shaina. The lenard copy the waverley. The lenard factor the shaina. The lenard factor the waverley. The lenard trot the waverley. The waverley is ebionite. The waverley factor the shaina. The waverley trot the shaina. If something trot the shaina then the shaina trot the waverley. If something factor the shaina and the shaina trot the waverley then the shaina trot the lenard. If the lenard copy the shaina and the shaina factor the lenard then the shaina copy the waverley. If the shaina factor the waverley then the shaina is ebionite. If something trot the lenard then the lenard trot the shaina. If something is lusty and gushing then it factor the lenard. The lenard is big.", "logic": "\nCopy(shaina, lenard)\nLusty(lenard)\nCopy(lenard, shaina)\nCopy(lenard, waverley)\nFactor(lenard, shaina)\nFactor(lenard, waverley)\nTrot(lenard, waverley)\nEbionite(waverley)\nFactor(waverley, shaina)\nTrot(waverley, shaina)\nforall x (Trot(x, shaina) -> Trot(shaina, waverley))\nforall x (Factor(x, shaina) and Trot(shaina, waverley) -> Trot(shaina, lenard))\nCopy(lenard, shaina) and Factor(shaina, lenard) -> Copy(shaina, waverley)\nFactor(shaina, waverley) -> Ebionite(shaina)\nforall x (Trot(x, lenard) -> Trot(lenard, shaina))\nforall x (Lusty(x) and Gushing(x) -> Factor(x, lenard))\n\nBig(lenard)\n\nBig(lenard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The morris crossruff the catherin. The lorene guzzle the morris. The catherin is mnemonic. If something room the morris then it crossruff the lorene. If something crossruff the catherin then the catherin guzzle the lorene. If something guzzle the lorene and the lorene guzzle the morris then it room the morris. If something is remiss and it crossruff the catherin then it room the lorene. If the morris guzzle the catherin and the morris is reasoned then the catherin crossruff the lorene. If something crossruff the catherin then it is perirhinal. If something crossruff the lorene and it guzzle the catherin then the lorene guzzle the morris. If something guzzle the lorene then the lorene is remiss. The morris crossruff the catherin.", "logic": "\nCrossruff(morris, catherin)\nGuzzle(lorene, morris)\nMnemonic(catherin)\nforall x (Room(x, morris) -> Crossruff(x, lorene))\nforall x (Crossruff(x, catherin) -> Guzzle(catherin, lorene))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, lorene) and Guzzle(lorene, morris) -> Room(x, morris))\nforall x (Remiss(x) and Crossruff(x, catherin) -> Room(x, lorene))\nGuzzle(morris, catherin) and Reasoned(morris) -> Crossruff(catherin, lorene)\nforall x (Crossruff(x, catherin) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Crossruff(x, lorene) and Guzzle(x, catherin) -> Guzzle(lorene, morris))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, lorene) -> Remiss(lorene))\n\nCrossruff(morris, catherin)\n\ntherefore Crossruff(morris, catherin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The fina transcribe the valry. The hedwig listen the fina. The valry is liverish. If something sinter the fina then it transcribe the hedwig. If something transcribe the valry then the valry listen the hedwig. If something listen the hedwig and the hedwig listen the fina then it sinter the fina. If something is emerging and it transcribe the valry then it sinter the hedwig. If the fina listen the valry and the fina is undetected then the valry transcribe the hedwig. If something transcribe the valry then it is cragged. If something transcribe the hedwig and it listen the valry then the hedwig listen the fina. If something listen the hedwig then the hedwig is emerging. The fina does not eat the valry.", "logic": "\nTranscribe(fina, valry)\nListen(hedwig, fina)\nLiverish(valry)\nforall x (Sinter(x, fina) -> Transcribe(x, hedwig))\nforall x (Transcribe(x, valry) -> Listen(valry, hedwig))\nforall x (Listen(x, hedwig) and Listen(hedwig, fina) -> Sinter(x, fina))\nforall x (Emerging(x) and Transcribe(x, valry) -> Sinter(x, hedwig))\nListen(fina, valry) and Undetected(fina) -> Transcribe(valry, hedwig)\nforall x (Transcribe(x, valry) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Transcribe(x, hedwig) and Listen(x, valry) -> Listen(hedwig, fina))\nforall x (Listen(x, hedwig) -> Emerging(hedwig))\n\nnot Transcribe(fina, valry)\n\ntherefore Transcribe(fina, valry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The cherilynn eulogize the jobey. The galen bath the cherilynn. The jobey is symbolic. If something plait the cherilynn then it eulogize the galen. If something eulogize the jobey then the jobey bath the galen. If something bath the galen and the galen bath the cherilynn then it plait the cherilynn. If something is atheist and it eulogize the jobey then it plait the galen. If the cherilynn bath the jobey and the cherilynn is mediated then the jobey eulogize the galen. If something eulogize the jobey then it is isomeric. If something eulogize the galen and it bath the jobey then the galen bath the cherilynn. If something bath the galen then the galen is atheist. The cherilynn is isomeric.", "logic": "\nEulogize(cherilynn, jobey)\nBath(galen, cherilynn)\nSymbolic(jobey)\nforall x (Plait(x, cherilynn) -> Eulogize(x, galen))\nforall x (Eulogize(x, jobey) -> Bath(jobey, galen))\nforall x (Bath(x, galen) and Bath(galen, cherilynn) -> Plait(x, cherilynn))\nforall x (Atheist(x) and Eulogize(x, jobey) -> Plait(x, galen))\nBath(cherilynn, jobey) and Mediated(cherilynn) -> Eulogize(jobey, galen)\nforall x (Eulogize(x, jobey) -> Isomeric(x))\nforall x (Eulogize(x, galen) and Bath(x, jobey) -> Bath(galen, cherilynn))\nforall x (Bath(x, galen) -> Atheist(galen))\n\nIsomeric(cherilynn)\n\nEulogize(cherilynn, jobey) and forall x (Eulogize(x, jobey) -> Isomeric(x)) -> therefore Isomeric(cherilynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The charline trigger the sherman. The tymothy clout the charline. The sherman is compressed. If something fester the charline then it trigger the tymothy. If something trigger the sherman then the sherman clout the tymothy. If something clout the tymothy and the tymothy clout the charline then it fester the charline. If something is satyric and it trigger the sherman then it fester the tymothy. If the charline clout the sherman and the charline is spherical then the sherman trigger the tymothy. If something trigger the sherman then it is cyclic. If something trigger the tymothy and it clout the sherman then the tymothy clout the charline. If something clout the tymothy then the tymothy is satyric. The sherman does not chase the tymothy.", "logic": "\nTrigger(charline, sherman)\nClout(tymothy, charline)\nCompressed(sherman)\nforall x (Fester(x, charline) -> Trigger(x, tymothy))\nforall x (Trigger(x, sherman) -> Clout(sherman, tymothy))\nforall x (Clout(x, tymothy) and Clout(tymothy, charline) -> Fester(x, charline))\nforall x (Satyric(x) and Trigger(x, sherman) -> Fester(x, tymothy))\nClout(charline, sherman) and Spherical(charline) -> Trigger(sherman, tymothy)\nforall x (Trigger(x, sherman) -> Cyclic(x))\nforall x (Trigger(x, tymothy) and Clout(x, sherman) -> Clout(tymothy, charline))\nforall x (Clout(x, tymothy) -> Satyric(tymothy))\n\nnot Clout(sherman, tymothy)\n\nTrigger(charline, sherman) and forall x (Trigger(x, sherman) -> Clout(sherman, tymothy)) -> therefore Clout(sherman, tymothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The georgeta encrust the bonny. The niall ordinate the georgeta. The bonny is synoptical. If something commove the georgeta then it encrust the niall. If something encrust the bonny then the bonny ordinate the niall. If something ordinate the niall and the niall ordinate the georgeta then it commove the georgeta. If something is argentine and it encrust the bonny then it commove the niall. If the georgeta ordinate the bonny and the georgeta is peptic then the bonny encrust the niall. If something encrust the bonny then it is ossiferous. If something encrust the niall and it ordinate the bonny then the niall ordinate the georgeta. If something ordinate the niall then the niall is argentine. The bonny commove the georgeta.", "logic": "\nEncrust(georgeta, bonny)\nOrdinate(niall, georgeta)\nSynoptical(bonny)\nforall x (Commove(x, georgeta) -> Encrust(x, niall))\nforall x (Encrust(x, bonny) -> Ordinate(bonny, niall))\nforall x (Ordinate(x, niall) and Ordinate(niall, georgeta) -> Commove(x, georgeta))\nforall x (Argentine(x) and Encrust(x, bonny) -> Commove(x, niall))\nOrdinate(georgeta, bonny) and Peptic(georgeta) -> Encrust(bonny, niall)\nforall x (Encrust(x, bonny) -> Ossiferous(x))\nforall x (Encrust(x, niall) and Ordinate(x, bonny) -> Ordinate(niall, georgeta))\nforall x (Ordinate(x, niall) -> Argentine(niall))\n\nCommove(bonny, georgeta)\n\nEncrust(georgeta, bonny) and forall x (Encrust(x, bonny) -> Ordinate(bonny, niall)) -> therefore Ordinate(bonny, niall) Ordinate(bonny, niall) and Ordinate(niall, georgeta) and forall x (Ordinate(x, niall) and Ordinate(niall, georgeta) -> Commove(x, georgeta)) -> therefore Commove(bonny, georgeta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The glenna squeak the desdemona. The libbey harry the glenna. The desdemona is disorderly. If something squeal the glenna then it squeak the libbey. If something squeak the desdemona then the desdemona harry the libbey. If something harry the libbey and the libbey harry the glenna then it squeal the glenna. If something is pimply and it squeak the desdemona then it squeal the libbey. If the glenna harry the desdemona and the glenna is weathered then the desdemona squeak the libbey. If something squeak the desdemona then it is actinoid. If something squeak the libbey and it harry the desdemona then the libbey harry the glenna. If something harry the libbey then the libbey is pimply. The desdemona does not visit the glenna.", "logic": "\nSqueak(glenna, desdemona)\nHarry(libbey, glenna)\nDisorderly(desdemona)\nforall x (Squeal(x, glenna) -> Squeak(x, libbey))\nforall x (Squeak(x, desdemona) -> Harry(desdemona, libbey))\nforall x (Harry(x, libbey) and Harry(libbey, glenna) -> Squeal(x, glenna))\nforall x (Pimply(x) and Squeak(x, desdemona) -> Squeal(x, libbey))\nHarry(glenna, desdemona) and Weathered(glenna) -> Squeak(desdemona, libbey)\nforall x (Squeak(x, desdemona) -> Actinoid(x))\nforall x (Squeak(x, libbey) and Harry(x, desdemona) -> Harry(libbey, glenna))\nforall x (Harry(x, libbey) -> Pimply(libbey))\n\nnot Squeal(desdemona, glenna)\n\nSqueak(glenna, desdemona) and forall x (Squeak(x, desdemona) -> Harry(desdemona, libbey)) -> therefore Harry(desdemona, libbey) Harry(desdemona, libbey) and Harry(libbey, glenna) and forall x (Harry(x, libbey) and Harry(libbey, glenna) -> Squeal(x, glenna)) -> therefore Squeal(desdemona, glenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The jana sallow the diann. The cordelia perorate the jana. The diann is barbadian. If something detour the jana then it sallow the cordelia. If something sallow the diann then the diann perorate the cordelia. If something perorate the cordelia and the cordelia perorate the jana then it detour the jana. If something is meet and it sallow the diann then it detour the cordelia. If the jana perorate the diann and the jana is stimulant then the diann sallow the cordelia. If something sallow the diann then it is none. If something sallow the cordelia and it perorate the diann then the cordelia perorate the jana. If something perorate the cordelia then the cordelia is meet. The diann sallow the cordelia.", "logic": "\nSallow(jana, diann)\nPerorate(cordelia, jana)\nBarbadian(diann)\nforall x (Detour(x, jana) -> Sallow(x, cordelia))\nforall x (Sallow(x, diann) -> Perorate(diann, cordelia))\nforall x (Perorate(x, cordelia) and Perorate(cordelia, jana) -> Detour(x, jana))\nforall x (Meet(x) and Sallow(x, diann) -> Detour(x, cordelia))\nPerorate(jana, diann) and Stimulant(jana) -> Sallow(diann, cordelia)\nforall x (Sallow(x, diann) -> None(x))\nforall x (Sallow(x, cordelia) and Perorate(x, diann) -> Perorate(cordelia, jana))\nforall x (Perorate(x, cordelia) -> Meet(cordelia))\n\nSallow(diann, cordelia)\n\nSallow(jana, diann) and forall x (Sallow(x, diann) -> Perorate(diann, cordelia)) -> therefore Perorate(diann, cordelia) Perorate(diann, cordelia) and Perorate(cordelia, jana) and forall x (Perorate(x, cordelia) and Perorate(cordelia, jana) -> Detour(x, jana)) -> therefore Detour(diann, jana) Detour(diann, jana) and forall x (Detour(x, jana) -> Sallow(x, cordelia)) -> therefore Sallow(diann, cordelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The loleta patinise the tarrah. The bancroft accompany the loleta. The tarrah is cragged. If something prioritise the loleta then it patinise the bancroft. If something patinise the tarrah then the tarrah accompany the bancroft. If something accompany the bancroft and the bancroft accompany the loleta then it prioritise the loleta. If something is invincible and it patinise the tarrah then it prioritise the bancroft. If the loleta accompany the tarrah and the loleta is disliked then the tarrah patinise the bancroft. If something patinise the tarrah then it is cushy. If something patinise the bancroft and it accompany the tarrah then the bancroft accompany the loleta. If something accompany the bancroft then the bancroft is invincible. The tarrah does not eat the bancroft.", "logic": "\nPatinise(loleta, tarrah)\nAccompany(bancroft, loleta)\nCragged(tarrah)\nforall x (Prioritise(x, loleta) -> Patinise(x, bancroft))\nforall x (Patinise(x, tarrah) -> Accompany(tarrah, bancroft))\nforall x (Accompany(x, bancroft) and Accompany(bancroft, loleta) -> Prioritise(x, loleta))\nforall x (Invincible(x) and Patinise(x, tarrah) -> Prioritise(x, bancroft))\nAccompany(loleta, tarrah) and Disliked(loleta) -> Patinise(tarrah, bancroft)\nforall x (Patinise(x, tarrah) -> Cushy(x))\nforall x (Patinise(x, bancroft) and Accompany(x, tarrah) -> Accompany(bancroft, loleta))\nforall x (Accompany(x, bancroft) -> Invincible(bancroft))\n\nnot Patinise(tarrah, bancroft)\n\nPatinise(loleta, tarrah) and forall x (Patinise(x, tarrah) -> Accompany(tarrah, bancroft)) -> therefore Accompany(tarrah, bancroft) Accompany(tarrah, bancroft) and Accompany(bancroft, loleta) and forall x (Accompany(x, bancroft) and Accompany(bancroft, loleta) -> Prioritise(x, loleta)) -> therefore Prioritise(tarrah, loleta) Prioritise(tarrah, loleta) and forall x (Prioritise(x, loleta) -> Patinise(x, bancroft)) -> therefore Patinise(tarrah, bancroft)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The lucie flesh the ginni. The malorie court the lucie. The ginni is bimodal. If something draw the lucie then it flesh the malorie. If something flesh the ginni then the ginni court the malorie. If something court the malorie and the malorie court the lucie then it draw the lucie. If something is auld and it flesh the ginni then it draw the malorie. If the lucie court the ginni and the lucie is concessive then the ginni flesh the malorie. If something flesh the ginni then it is blotto. If something flesh the malorie and it court the ginni then the malorie court the lucie. If something court the malorie then the malorie is auld. The malorie is not blotto.", "logic": "\nFlesh(lucie, ginni)\nCourt(malorie, lucie)\nBimodal(ginni)\nforall x (Draw(x, lucie) -> Flesh(x, malorie))\nforall x (Flesh(x, ginni) -> Court(ginni, malorie))\nforall x (Court(x, malorie) and Court(malorie, lucie) -> Draw(x, lucie))\nforall x (Auld(x) and Flesh(x, ginni) -> Draw(x, malorie))\nCourt(lucie, ginni) and Concessive(lucie) -> Flesh(ginni, malorie)\nforall x (Flesh(x, ginni) -> Blotto(x))\nforall x (Flesh(x, malorie) and Court(x, ginni) -> Court(malorie, lucie))\nforall x (Court(x, malorie) -> Auld(malorie))\n\nnot Blotto(malorie)\n\nforall x (Flesh(x, ginni) -> Blotto(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The frayda italicize the skipton. The herminia palpate the frayda. The skipton is functional. If something search the frayda then it italicize the herminia. If something italicize the skipton then the skipton palpate the herminia. If something palpate the herminia and the herminia palpate the frayda then it search the frayda. If something is fain and it italicize the skipton then it search the herminia. If the frayda palpate the skipton and the frayda is anguished then the skipton italicize the herminia. If something italicize the skipton then it is curling. If something italicize the herminia and it palpate the skipton then the herminia palpate the frayda. If something palpate the herminia then the herminia is fain. The herminia search the frayda.", "logic": "\nItalicize(frayda, skipton)\nPalpate(herminia, frayda)\nFunctional(skipton)\nforall x (Search(x, frayda) -> Italicize(x, herminia))\nforall x (Italicize(x, skipton) -> Palpate(skipton, herminia))\nforall x (Palpate(x, herminia) and Palpate(herminia, frayda) -> Search(x, frayda))\nforall x (Fain(x) and Italicize(x, skipton) -> Search(x, herminia))\nPalpate(frayda, skipton) and Anguished(frayda) -> Italicize(skipton, herminia)\nforall x (Italicize(x, skipton) -> Curling(x))\nforall x (Italicize(x, herminia) and Palpate(x, skipton) -> Palpate(herminia, frayda))\nforall x (Palpate(x, herminia) -> Fain(herminia))\n\nSearch(herminia, frayda)\n\nforall x (Palpate(x, herminia) and Palpate(herminia, frayda) -> Search(x, frayda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The brigitte glare the pamelina. The freeman disembowel the brigitte. The pamelina is gluteal. If something forward the brigitte then it glare the freeman. If something glare the pamelina then the pamelina disembowel the freeman. If something disembowel the freeman and the freeman disembowel the brigitte then it forward the brigitte. If something is mimic and it glare the pamelina then it forward the freeman. If the brigitte disembowel the pamelina and the brigitte is chiasmal then the pamelina glare the freeman. If something glare the pamelina then it is aciculate. If something glare the freeman and it disembowel the pamelina then the freeman disembowel the brigitte. If something disembowel the freeman then the freeman is mimic. The pamelina does not visit the freeman.", "logic": "\nGlare(brigitte, pamelina)\nDisembowel(freeman, brigitte)\nGluteal(pamelina)\nforall x (Forward(x, brigitte) -> Glare(x, freeman))\nforall x (Glare(x, pamelina) -> Disembowel(pamelina, freeman))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, freeman) and Disembowel(freeman, brigitte) -> Forward(x, brigitte))\nforall x (Mimic(x) and Glare(x, pamelina) -> Forward(x, freeman))\nDisembowel(brigitte, pamelina) and Chiasmal(brigitte) -> Glare(pamelina, freeman)\nforall x (Glare(x, pamelina) -> Aciculate(x))\nforall x (Glare(x, freeman) and Disembowel(x, pamelina) -> Disembowel(freeman, brigitte))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, freeman) -> Mimic(freeman))\n\nnot Forward(pamelina, freeman)\n\nforall x (Mimic(x) and Glare(x, pamelina) -> Forward(x, freeman)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The stefania conduct the pearce. The jodi medicate the stefania. The pearce is adhesive. If something vaccinate the stefania then it conduct the jodi. If something conduct the pearce then the pearce medicate the jodi. If something medicate the jodi and the jodi medicate the stefania then it vaccinate the stefania. If something is hirsute and it conduct the pearce then it vaccinate the jodi. If the stefania medicate the pearce and the stefania is adnexal then the pearce conduct the jodi. If something conduct the pearce then it is diverse. If something conduct the jodi and it medicate the pearce then the jodi medicate the stefania. If something medicate the jodi then the jodi is hirsute. The jodi vaccinate the jodi.", "logic": "\nConduct(stefania, pearce)\nMedicate(jodi, stefania)\nAdhesive(pearce)\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, stefania) -> Conduct(x, jodi))\nforall x (Conduct(x, pearce) -> Medicate(pearce, jodi))\nforall x (Medicate(x, jodi) and Medicate(jodi, stefania) -> Vaccinate(x, stefania))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) and Conduct(x, pearce) -> Vaccinate(x, jodi))\nMedicate(stefania, pearce) and Adnexal(stefania) -> Conduct(pearce, jodi)\nforall x (Conduct(x, pearce) -> Diverse(x))\nforall x (Conduct(x, jodi) and Medicate(x, pearce) -> Medicate(jodi, stefania))\nforall x (Medicate(x, jodi) -> Hirsute(jodi))\n\nVaccinate(jodi, jodi)\n\nforall x (Hirsute(x) and Conduct(x, pearce) -> Vaccinate(x, jodi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The edgar action the devon. The alaine hydrate the edgar. The devon is justified. If something sanitate the edgar then it action the alaine. If something action the devon then the devon hydrate the alaine. If something hydrate the alaine and the alaine hydrate the edgar then it sanitate the edgar. If something is chesty and it action the devon then it sanitate the alaine. If the edgar hydrate the devon and the edgar is hortatory then the devon action the alaine. If something action the devon then it is trillion. If something action the alaine and it hydrate the devon then the alaine hydrate the edgar. If something hydrate the alaine then the alaine is chesty. The alaine does not chase the alaine.", "logic": "\nAction(edgar, devon)\nHydrate(alaine, edgar)\nJustified(devon)\nforall x (Sanitate(x, edgar) -> Action(x, alaine))\nforall x (Action(x, devon) -> Hydrate(devon, alaine))\nforall x (Hydrate(x, alaine) and Hydrate(alaine, edgar) -> Sanitate(x, edgar))\nforall x (Chesty(x) and Action(x, devon) -> Sanitate(x, alaine))\nHydrate(edgar, devon) and Hortatory(edgar) -> Action(devon, alaine)\nforall x (Action(x, devon) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Action(x, alaine) and Hydrate(x, devon) -> Hydrate(alaine, edgar))\nforall x (Hydrate(x, alaine) -> Chesty(alaine))\n\nnot Hydrate(alaine, alaine)\n\nnot Hydrate(alaine, alaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The flemming mismate the hall. The vail rafter the flemming. The hall is parted. If something holiday the flemming then it mismate the vail. If something mismate the hall then the hall rafter the vail. If something rafter the vail and the vail rafter the flemming then it holiday the flemming. If something is swazi and it mismate the hall then it holiday the vail. If the flemming rafter the hall and the flemming is faveolate then the hall mismate the vail. If something mismate the hall then it is urban. If something mismate the vail and it rafter the hall then the vail rafter the flemming. If something rafter the vail then the vail is swazi. The flemming mismate the flemming.", "logic": "\nMismate(flemming, hall)\nRafter(vail, flemming)\nParted(hall)\nforall x (Holiday(x, flemming) -> Mismate(x, vail))\nforall x (Mismate(x, hall) -> Rafter(hall, vail))\nforall x (Rafter(x, vail) and Rafter(vail, flemming) -> Holiday(x, flemming))\nforall x (Swazi(x) and Mismate(x, hall) -> Holiday(x, vail))\nRafter(flemming, hall) and Faveolate(flemming) -> Mismate(hall, vail)\nforall x (Mismate(x, hall) -> Urban(x))\nforall x (Mismate(x, vail) and Rafter(x, hall) -> Rafter(vail, flemming))\nforall x (Rafter(x, vail) -> Swazi(vail))\n\nMismate(flemming, flemming)\n\nMismate(flemming, flemming) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The udall drudge the friedrick. The barbey simonise the udall. The friedrick is pawky. If something effervesce the udall then it drudge the barbey. If something drudge the friedrick then the friedrick simonise the barbey. If something simonise the barbey and the barbey simonise the udall then it effervesce the udall. If something is glassed and it drudge the friedrick then it effervesce the barbey. If the udall simonise the friedrick and the udall is duncical then the friedrick drudge the barbey. If something drudge the friedrick then it is unroofed. If something drudge the barbey and it simonise the friedrick then the barbey simonise the udall. If something simonise the barbey then the barbey is glassed. The udall is not duncical.", "logic": "\nDrudge(udall, friedrick)\nSimonise(barbey, udall)\nPawky(friedrick)\nforall x (Effervesce(x, udall) -> Drudge(x, barbey))\nforall x (Drudge(x, friedrick) -> Simonise(friedrick, barbey))\nforall x (Simonise(x, barbey) and Simonise(barbey, udall) -> Effervesce(x, udall))\nforall x (Glassed(x) and Drudge(x, friedrick) -> Effervesce(x, barbey))\nSimonise(udall, friedrick) and Duncical(udall) -> Drudge(friedrick, barbey)\nforall x (Drudge(x, friedrick) -> Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Drudge(x, barbey) and Simonise(x, friedrick) -> Simonise(barbey, udall))\nforall x (Simonise(x, barbey) -> Glassed(barbey))\n\nnot Duncical(udall)\n\nnot Duncical(udall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The fox unloosen the maryanna. The aubine gluttonize the fox. The maryanna is lancelike. If something trim the fox then it unloosen the aubine. If something unloosen the maryanna then the maryanna gluttonize the aubine. If something gluttonize the aubine and the aubine gluttonize the fox then it trim the fox. If something is edematous and it unloosen the maryanna then it trim the aubine. If the fox gluttonize the maryanna and the fox is hirsute then the maryanna unloosen the aubine. If something unloosen the maryanna then it is wrecked. If something unloosen the aubine and it gluttonize the maryanna then the aubine gluttonize the fox. If something gluttonize the aubine then the aubine is edematous. The fox gluttonize the fox.", "logic": "\nUnloosen(fox, maryanna)\nGluttonize(aubine, fox)\nLancelike(maryanna)\nforall x (Trim(x, fox) -> Unloosen(x, aubine))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, maryanna) -> Gluttonize(maryanna, aubine))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, aubine) and Gluttonize(aubine, fox) -> Trim(x, fox))\nforall x (Edematous(x) and Unloosen(x, maryanna) -> Trim(x, aubine))\nGluttonize(fox, maryanna) and Hirsute(fox) -> Unloosen(maryanna, aubine)\nforall x (Unloosen(x, maryanna) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, aubine) and Gluttonize(x, maryanna) -> Gluttonize(aubine, fox))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, aubine) -> Edematous(aubine))\n\nGluttonize(fox, fox)\n\nGluttonize(fox, fox) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The larina egest the larine. The larine gasify the allyce. The allyce egest the larine. All allover people are coccoid. If the larina egest the larine then the larina egest the allyce. If someone reissue the larina then the larina gasify the allyce. If someone gasify the allyce then they eat the larina. If someone is deliberate then they are troubled. If someone gasify the larine and the larine does not need the larina then the larina egest the larine. The larina egest the larine.", "logic": "\nEgest(larina, larine)\nGasify(larine, allyce)\nEgest(allyce, larine)\nforall x (Allover(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nEgest(larina, larine) -> Egest(larina, allyce)\nforall x (Reissue(x, larina) -> Gasify(larina, allyce))\nforall x (Gasify(x, allyce) -> Reissue(x, larina))\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Troubled(x))\nforall x (Gasify(x, larine) and not Egest(larine, larina) -> Egest(larina, larine))\n\nEgest(larina, larine)\n\ntherefore Egest(larina, larine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The salomon safeguard the felipa. The felipa contour the barth. The barth safeguard the felipa. All corporate people are forked. If the salomon safeguard the felipa then the salomon safeguard the barth. If someone sorb the salomon then the salomon contour the barth. If someone contour the barth then they eat the salomon. If someone is peripteral then they are innumerate. If someone contour the felipa and the felipa does not need the salomon then the salomon safeguard the felipa. The felipa does not visit the barth.", "logic": "\nSafeguard(salomon, felipa)\nContour(felipa, barth)\nSafeguard(barth, felipa)\nforall x (Corporate(x) -> Forked(x))\nSafeguard(salomon, felipa) -> Safeguard(salomon, barth)\nforall x (Sorb(x, salomon) -> Contour(salomon, barth))\nforall x (Contour(x, barth) -> Sorb(x, salomon))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) -> Innumerate(x))\nforall x (Contour(x, felipa) and not Safeguard(felipa, salomon) -> Safeguard(salomon, felipa))\n\nnot Contour(felipa, barth)\n\ntherefore Contour(felipa, barth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The lenette presume the bertrand. The bertrand stylise the alaa. The alaa presume the bertrand. All molar people are figured. If the lenette presume the bertrand then the lenette presume the alaa. If someone sidestep the lenette then the lenette stylise the alaa. If someone stylise the alaa then they eat the lenette. If someone is inviolate then they are gnarled. If someone stylise the bertrand and the bertrand does not need the lenette then the lenette presume the bertrand. The lenette presume the alaa.", "logic": "\nPresume(lenette, bertrand)\nStylise(bertrand, alaa)\nPresume(alaa, bertrand)\nforall x (Molar(x) -> Figured(x))\nPresume(lenette, bertrand) -> Presume(lenette, alaa)\nforall x (Sidestep(x, lenette) -> Stylise(lenette, alaa))\nforall x (Stylise(x, alaa) -> Sidestep(x, lenette))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) -> Gnarled(x))\nforall x (Stylise(x, bertrand) and not Presume(bertrand, lenette) -> Presume(lenette, bertrand))\n\nPresume(lenette, alaa)\n\nPresume(lenette, bertrand) and Presume(lenette, bertrand) -> Presume(lenette, alaa) -> therefore Presume(lenette, alaa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The lowell crawl the tina. The tina foregather the sanderson. The sanderson crawl the tina. All bregmatic people are deliberate. If the lowell crawl the tina then the lowell crawl the sanderson. If someone trumpet the lowell then the lowell foregather the sanderson. If someone foregather the sanderson then they eat the lowell. If someone is tinkling then they are muscovite. If someone foregather the tina and the tina does not need the lowell then the lowell crawl the tina. The tina does not eat the lowell.", "logic": "\nCrawl(lowell, tina)\nForegather(tina, sanderson)\nCrawl(sanderson, tina)\nforall x (Bregmatic(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nCrawl(lowell, tina) -> Crawl(lowell, sanderson)\nforall x (Trumpet(x, lowell) -> Foregather(lowell, sanderson))\nforall x (Foregather(x, sanderson) -> Trumpet(x, lowell))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Muscovite(x))\nforall x (Foregather(x, tina) and not Crawl(tina, lowell) -> Crawl(lowell, tina))\n\nnot Trumpet(tina, lowell)\n\nForegather(tina, sanderson) and forall x (Foregather(x, sanderson) -> Trumpet(x, lowell)) -> therefore Trumpet(tina, lowell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The cob entrench the hannis. The hannis divorce the cathyleen. The cathyleen entrench the hannis. All ginger people are asleep. If the cob entrench the hannis then the cob entrench the cathyleen. If someone busk the cob then the cob divorce the cathyleen. If someone divorce the cathyleen then they eat the cob. If someone is azotic then they are junior. If someone divorce the hannis and the hannis does not need the cob then the cob entrench the hannis. The cob divorce the cathyleen.", "logic": "\nEntrench(cob, hannis)\nDivorce(hannis, cathyleen)\nEntrench(cathyleen, hannis)\nforall x (Ginger(x) -> Asleep(x))\nEntrench(cob, hannis) -> Entrench(cob, cathyleen)\nforall x (Busk(x, cob) -> Divorce(cob, cathyleen))\nforall x (Divorce(x, cathyleen) -> Busk(x, cob))\nforall x (Azotic(x) -> Junior(x))\nforall x (Divorce(x, hannis) and not Entrench(hannis, cob) -> Entrench(cob, hannis))\n\nDivorce(cob, cathyleen)\n\nDivorce(hannis, cathyleen) and forall x (Divorce(x, cathyleen) -> Busk(x, cob)) -> therefore Busk(hannis, cob) Busk(hannis, cob) and forall x (Busk(x, cob) -> Divorce(cob, cathyleen)) -> therefore Divorce(cob, cathyleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The adora desire the celesta. The celesta polarise the sonia. The sonia desire the celesta. All prolonged people are invalid. If the adora desire the celesta then the adora desire the sonia. If someone found the adora then the adora polarise the sonia. If someone polarise the sonia then they eat the adora. If someone is ingrowing then they are arch. If someone polarise the celesta and the celesta does not need the adora then the adora desire the celesta. The adora does not visit the sonia.", "logic": "\nDesire(adora, celesta)\nPolarise(celesta, sonia)\nDesire(sonia, celesta)\nforall x (Prolonged(x) -> Invalid(x))\nDesire(adora, celesta) -> Desire(adora, sonia)\nforall x (Found(x, adora) -> Polarise(adora, sonia))\nforall x (Polarise(x, sonia) -> Found(x, adora))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Arch(x))\nforall x (Polarise(x, celesta) and not Desire(celesta, adora) -> Desire(adora, celesta))\n\nnot Polarise(adora, sonia)\n\nPolarise(celesta, sonia) and forall x (Polarise(x, sonia) -> Found(x, adora)) -> therefore Found(celesta, adora) Found(celesta, adora) and forall x (Found(x, adora) -> Polarise(adora, sonia)) -> therefore Polarise(adora, sonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The arda trellis the jeanne. The jeanne spur the baily. The baily trellis the jeanne. All cerous people are fruticose. If the arda trellis the jeanne then the arda trellis the baily. If someone vote the arda then the arda spur the baily. If someone spur the baily then they eat the arda. If someone is lowbrow then they are jesuit. If someone spur the jeanne and the jeanne does not need the arda then the arda trellis the jeanne. The arda vote the arda.", "logic": "\nTrellis(arda, jeanne)\nSpur(jeanne, baily)\nTrellis(baily, jeanne)\nforall x (Cerous(x) -> Fruticose(x))\nTrellis(arda, jeanne) -> Trellis(arda, baily)\nforall x (Vote(x, arda) -> Spur(arda, baily))\nforall x (Spur(x, baily) -> Vote(x, arda))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Spur(x, jeanne) and not Trellis(jeanne, arda) -> Trellis(arda, jeanne))\n\nVote(arda, arda)\n\nSpur(jeanne, baily) and forall x (Spur(x, baily) -> Vote(x, arda)) -> therefore Vote(jeanne, arda) Vote(jeanne, arda) and forall x (Vote(x, arda) -> Spur(arda, baily)) -> therefore Spur(arda, baily) Spur(arda, baily) and forall x (Spur(x, baily) -> Vote(x, arda)) -> therefore Vote(arda, arda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The emanuel obey the chickie. The chickie format the walsh. The walsh obey the chickie. All perdurable people are fatuous. If the emanuel obey the chickie then the emanuel obey the walsh. If someone outrage the emanuel then the emanuel format the walsh. If someone format the walsh then they eat the emanuel. If someone is roughened then they are permanent. If someone format the chickie and the chickie does not need the emanuel then the emanuel obey the chickie. The emanuel does not eat the emanuel.", "logic": "\nObey(emanuel, chickie)\nFormat(chickie, walsh)\nObey(walsh, chickie)\nforall x (Perdurable(x) -> Fatuous(x))\nObey(emanuel, chickie) -> Obey(emanuel, walsh)\nforall x (Outrage(x, emanuel) -> Format(emanuel, walsh))\nforall x (Format(x, walsh) -> Outrage(x, emanuel))\nforall x (Roughened(x) -> Permanent(x))\nforall x (Format(x, chickie) and not Obey(chickie, emanuel) -> Obey(emanuel, chickie))\n\nnot Outrage(emanuel, emanuel)\n\nFormat(chickie, walsh) and forall x (Format(x, walsh) -> Outrage(x, emanuel)) -> therefore Outrage(chickie, emanuel) Outrage(chickie, emanuel) and forall x (Outrage(x, emanuel) -> Format(emanuel, walsh)) -> therefore Format(emanuel, walsh) Format(emanuel, walsh) and forall x (Format(x, walsh) -> Outrage(x, emanuel)) -> therefore Outrage(emanuel, emanuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The wynny popularize the lanni. The lanni poison the emmye. The emmye popularize the lanni. All simplistic people are crinkled. If the wynny popularize the lanni then the wynny popularize the emmye. If someone dislike the wynny then the wynny poison the emmye. If someone poison the emmye then they eat the wynny. If someone is unkept then they are bailable. If someone poison the lanni and the lanni does not need the wynny then the wynny popularize the lanni. The wynny is not crinkled.", "logic": "\nPopularize(wynny, lanni)\nPoison(lanni, emmye)\nPopularize(emmye, lanni)\nforall x (Simplistic(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nPopularize(wynny, lanni) -> Popularize(wynny, emmye)\nforall x (Dislike(x, wynny) -> Poison(wynny, emmye))\nforall x (Poison(x, emmye) -> Dislike(x, wynny))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Bailable(x))\nforall x (Poison(x, lanni) and not Popularize(lanni, wynny) -> Popularize(wynny, lanni))\n\nnot Crinkled(wynny)\n\nforall x (Simplistic(x) -> Crinkled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The kathy cling the katheleen. The katheleen complexion the neysa. The neysa cling the katheleen. All glowering people are shod. If the kathy cling the katheleen then the kathy cling the neysa. If someone uncloak the kathy then the kathy complexion the neysa. If someone complexion the neysa then they eat the kathy. If someone is unreliable then they are spiky. If someone complexion the katheleen and the katheleen does not need the kathy then the kathy cling the katheleen. The neysa is spiky.", "logic": "\nCling(kathy, katheleen)\nComplexion(katheleen, neysa)\nCling(neysa, katheleen)\nforall x (Glowering(x) -> Shod(x))\nCling(kathy, katheleen) -> Cling(kathy, neysa)\nforall x (Uncloak(x, kathy) -> Complexion(kathy, neysa))\nforall x (Complexion(x, neysa) -> Uncloak(x, kathy))\nforall x (Unreliable(x) -> Spiky(x))\nforall x (Complexion(x, katheleen) and not Cling(katheleen, kathy) -> Cling(kathy, katheleen))\n\nSpiky(neysa)\n\nforall x (Unreliable(x) -> Spiky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The stewart lumber the lucine. The lucine package the christyna. The christyna lumber the lucine. All slumberous people are pulmonary. If the stewart lumber the lucine then the stewart lumber the christyna. If someone shnorr the stewart then the stewart package the christyna. If someone package the christyna then they eat the stewart. If someone is employed then they are purposeful. If someone package the lucine and the lucine does not need the stewart then the stewart lumber the lucine. The lucine is not purposeful.", "logic": "\nLumber(stewart, lucine)\nPackage(lucine, christyna)\nLumber(christyna, lucine)\nforall x (Slumberous(x) -> Pulmonary(x))\nLumber(stewart, lucine) -> Lumber(stewart, christyna)\nforall x (Shnorr(x, stewart) -> Package(stewart, christyna))\nforall x (Package(x, christyna) -> Shnorr(x, stewart))\nforall x (Employed(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Package(x, lucine) and not Lumber(lucine, stewart) -> Lumber(stewart, lucine))\n\nnot Purposeful(lucine)\n\nforall x (Employed(x) -> Purposeful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The theda symphonize the friedrich. The friedrich pass the lucilia. The lucilia symphonize the friedrich. All cyanophyte people are volumetric. If the theda symphonize the friedrich then the theda symphonize the lucilia. If someone intern the theda then the theda pass the lucilia. If someone pass the lucilia then they eat the theda. If someone is renascent then they are raptorial. If someone pass the friedrich and the friedrich does not need the theda then the theda symphonize the friedrich. The friedrich is volumetric.", "logic": "\nSymphonize(theda, friedrich)\nPass(friedrich, lucilia)\nSymphonize(lucilia, friedrich)\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) -> Volumetric(x))\nSymphonize(theda, friedrich) -> Symphonize(theda, lucilia)\nforall x (Intern(x, theda) -> Pass(theda, lucilia))\nforall x (Pass(x, lucilia) -> Intern(x, theda))\nforall x (Renascent(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Pass(x, friedrich) and not Symphonize(friedrich, theda) -> Symphonize(theda, friedrich))\n\nVolumetric(friedrich)\n\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) -> Volumetric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The christ specify the gwenni. The gwenni amaze the neysa. The neysa specify the gwenni. All adoptable people are quality. If the christ specify the gwenni then the christ specify the neysa. If someone clench the christ then the christ amaze the neysa. If someone amaze the neysa then they eat the christ. If someone is reflecting then they are uncoiled. If someone amaze the gwenni and the gwenni does not need the christ then the christ specify the gwenni. The gwenni does not need the gwenni.", "logic": "\nSpecify(christ, gwenni)\nAmaze(gwenni, neysa)\nSpecify(neysa, gwenni)\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Quality(x))\nSpecify(christ, gwenni) -> Specify(christ, neysa)\nforall x (Clench(x, christ) -> Amaze(christ, neysa))\nforall x (Amaze(x, neysa) -> Clench(x, christ))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Uncoiled(x))\nforall x (Amaze(x, gwenni) and not Specify(gwenni, christ) -> Specify(christ, gwenni))\n\nnot Specify(gwenni, gwenni)\n\nnot Specify(gwenni, gwenni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The orel move the gustaf. The gustaf outlive the eleonore. The eleonore move the gustaf. All biographic people are stretched. If the orel move the gustaf then the orel move the eleonore. If someone animise the orel then the orel outlive the eleonore. If someone outlive the eleonore then they eat the orel. If someone is imported then they are shopsoiled. If someone outlive the gustaf and the gustaf does not need the orel then the orel move the gustaf. The gustaf animise the eleonore.", "logic": "\nMove(orel, gustaf)\nOutlive(gustaf, eleonore)\nMove(eleonore, gustaf)\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Stretched(x))\nMove(orel, gustaf) -> Move(orel, eleonore)\nforall x (Animise(x, orel) -> Outlive(orel, eleonore))\nforall x (Outlive(x, eleonore) -> Animise(x, orel))\nforall x (Imported(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Outlive(x, gustaf) and not Move(gustaf, orel) -> Move(orel, gustaf))\n\nAnimise(gustaf, eleonore)\n\nAnimise(gustaf, eleonore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The judi audition the salvatore. The salvatore witch the richy. The richy audition the salvatore. All headed people are boney. If the judi audition the salvatore then the judi audition the richy. If someone confront the judi then the judi witch the richy. If someone witch the richy then they eat the judi. If someone is annual then they are wedded. If someone witch the salvatore and the salvatore does not need the judi then the judi audition the salvatore. The salvatore is not annual.", "logic": "\nAudition(judi, salvatore)\nWitch(salvatore, richy)\nAudition(richy, salvatore)\nforall x (Headed(x) -> Boney(x))\nAudition(judi, salvatore) -> Audition(judi, richy)\nforall x (Confront(x, judi) -> Witch(judi, richy))\nforall x (Witch(x, richy) -> Confront(x, judi))\nforall x (Annual(x) -> Wedded(x))\nforall x (Witch(x, salvatore) and not Audition(salvatore, judi) -> Audition(judi, salvatore))\n\nnot Annual(salvatore)\n\nnot Annual(salvatore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The whittaker snog the renie. The renie wreathe the guinna. The guinna snog the renie. All must people are apneic. If the whittaker snog the renie then the whittaker snog the guinna. If someone privilege the whittaker then the whittaker wreathe the guinna. If someone wreathe the guinna then they eat the whittaker. If someone is anxious then they are algolagnic. If someone wreathe the renie and the renie does not need the whittaker then the whittaker snog the renie. The whittaker is rough.", "logic": "\nSnog(whittaker, renie)\nWreathe(renie, guinna)\nSnog(guinna, renie)\nforall x (Must(x) -> Apneic(x))\nSnog(whittaker, renie) -> Snog(whittaker, guinna)\nforall x (Privilege(x, whittaker) -> Wreathe(whittaker, guinna))\nforall x (Wreathe(x, guinna) -> Privilege(x, whittaker))\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Algolagnic(x))\nforall x (Wreathe(x, renie) and not Snog(renie, whittaker) -> Snog(whittaker, renie))\n\nRough(whittaker)\n\nRough(whittaker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "Selle is acquainted. Big, overhasty things are not acquainted. If something is acquainted then it is overhasty. If something is overhasty and lifted then it is hatted. All boskopoid things are not lancelike. All overhasty things are boskopoid. If something is acquainted and not hatted then it is not boskopoid. Selle is acquainted.", "logic": "\nAcquainted(selle)\nforall x (Hatted(x) and Overhasty(x) -> not Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> Overhasty(x))\nforall x (Overhasty(x) and Lifted(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> not Lancelike(x))\nforall x (Overhasty(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Acquainted(x) and not Hatted(x) -> not Boskopoid(x))\n\nAcquainted(selle)\n\ntherefore Acquainted(selle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Idette is resupine. Big, municipal things are not resupine. If something is resupine then it is municipal. If something is municipal and funny then it is unselected. All cloze things are not benzenoid. All municipal things are cloze. If something is resupine and not unselected then it is not cloze. Idette is not resupine.", "logic": "\nResupine(idette)\nforall x (Unselected(x) and Municipal(x) -> not Resupine(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) -> Municipal(x))\nforall x (Municipal(x) and Funny(x) -> Unselected(x))\nforall x (Cloze(x) -> not Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Municipal(x) -> Cloze(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) and not Unselected(x) -> not Cloze(x))\n\nnot Resupine(idette)\n\ntherefore Resupine(idette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Kelcy is shocking. Big, genotypic things are not shocking. If something is shocking then it is genotypic. If something is genotypic and fastigiate then it is woebegone. All plausive things are not marshy. All genotypic things are plausive. If something is shocking and not woebegone then it is not plausive. Kelcy is genotypic.", "logic": "\nShocking(kelcy)\nforall x (Woebegone(x) and Genotypic(x) -> not Shocking(x))\nforall x (Shocking(x) -> Genotypic(x))\nforall x (Genotypic(x) and Fastigiate(x) -> Woebegone(x))\nforall x (Plausive(x) -> not Marshy(x))\nforall x (Genotypic(x) -> Plausive(x))\nforall x (Shocking(x) and not Woebegone(x) -> not Plausive(x))\n\nGenotypic(kelcy)\n\nShocking(kelcy) and forall x (Shocking(x) -> Genotypic(x)) -> therefore Genotypic(kelcy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Micki is frail. Big, sequent things are not frail. If something is frail then it is sequent. If something is sequent and aboveboard then it is alkylic. All dogmatic things are not metrical. All sequent things are dogmatic. If something is frail and not alkylic then it is not dogmatic. Micki is not sequent.", "logic": "\nFrail(micki)\nforall x (Alkylic(x) and Sequent(x) -> not Frail(x))\nforall x (Frail(x) -> Sequent(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Aboveboard(x) -> Alkylic(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) -> not Metrical(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) -> Dogmatic(x))\nforall x (Frail(x) and not Alkylic(x) -> not Dogmatic(x))\n\nnot Sequent(micki)\n\nFrail(micki) and forall x (Frail(x) -> Sequent(x)) -> therefore Sequent(micki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Wesley is sciolistic. Big, weepy things are not sciolistic. If something is sciolistic then it is weepy. If something is weepy and isosmotic then it is bottommost. All whorled things are not auxinic. All weepy things are whorled. If something is sciolistic and not bottommost then it is not whorled. Wesley is whorled.", "logic": "\nSciolistic(wesley)\nforall x (Bottommost(x) and Weepy(x) -> not Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) and Isosmotic(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nforall x (Whorled(x) -> not Auxinic(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Whorled(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) and not Bottommost(x) -> not Whorled(x))\n\nWhorled(wesley)\n\nSciolistic(wesley) and forall x (Sciolistic(x) -> Weepy(x)) -> therefore Weepy(wesley) Weepy(wesley) and forall x (Weepy(x) -> Whorled(x)) -> therefore Whorled(wesley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Gates is resiny. Big, sisyphean things are not resiny. If something is resiny then it is sisyphean. If something is sisyphean and unsatiated then it is extradural. All enteral things are not adpressed. All sisyphean things are enteral. If something is resiny and not extradural then it is not enteral. Gates is not enteral.", "logic": "\nResiny(gates)\nforall x (Extradural(x) and Sisyphean(x) -> not Resiny(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Unsatiated(x) -> Extradural(x))\nforall x (Enteral(x) -> not Adpressed(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Enteral(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) and not Extradural(x) -> not Enteral(x))\n\nnot Enteral(gates)\n\nResiny(gates) and forall x (Resiny(x) -> Sisyphean(x)) -> therefore Sisyphean(gates) Sisyphean(gates) and forall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Enteral(x)) -> therefore Enteral(gates)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Derek is libidinous. Big, ritual things are not libidinous. If something is libidinous then it is ritual. If something is ritual and plushy then it is backhanded. All hadean things are not domed. All ritual things are hadean. If something is libidinous and not backhanded then it is not hadean. Derek is not domed.", "logic": "\nLibidinous(derek)\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Ritual(x) -> not Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Libidinous(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Ritual(x) and Plushy(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> not Domed(x))\nforall x (Ritual(x) -> Hadean(x))\nforall x (Libidinous(x) and not Backhanded(x) -> not Hadean(x))\n\nnot Domed(derek)\n\nLibidinous(derek) and forall x (Libidinous(x) -> Ritual(x)) -> therefore Ritual(derek) Ritual(derek) and forall x (Ritual(x) -> Hadean(x)) -> therefore Hadean(derek) Hadean(derek) and forall x (Hadean(x) -> not Domed(x)) -> therefore not Domed(derek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Jewell is palsied. Big, cartesian things are not palsied. If something is palsied then it is cartesian. If something is cartesian and aghast then it is beauteous. All nodding things are not glottal. All cartesian things are nodding. If something is palsied and not beauteous then it is not nodding. Jewell is glottal.", "logic": "\nPalsied(jewell)\nforall x (Beauteous(x) and Cartesian(x) -> not Palsied(x))\nforall x (Palsied(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) and Aghast(x) -> Beauteous(x))\nforall x (Nodding(x) -> not Glottal(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Nodding(x))\nforall x (Palsied(x) and not Beauteous(x) -> not Nodding(x))\n\nGlottal(jewell)\n\nPalsied(jewell) and forall x (Palsied(x) -> Cartesian(x)) -> therefore Cartesian(jewell) Cartesian(jewell) and forall x (Cartesian(x) -> Nodding(x)) -> therefore Nodding(jewell) Nodding(jewell) and forall x (Nodding(x) -> not Glottal(x)) -> therefore not Glottal(jewell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Elton is coseismic. Big, alloyed things are not coseismic. If something is coseismic then it is alloyed. If something is alloyed and enteral then it is entitled. All bosomed things are not unsuitable. All alloyed things are bosomed. If something is coseismic and not entitled then it is not bosomed. Elton is not entitled.", "logic": "\nCoseismic(elton)\nforall x (Entitled(x) and Alloyed(x) -> not Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) -> Alloyed(x))\nforall x (Alloyed(x) and Enteral(x) -> Entitled(x))\nforall x (Bosomed(x) -> not Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Alloyed(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) and not Entitled(x) -> not Bosomed(x))\n\nnot Entitled(elton)\n\nforall x (Alloyed(x) and Enteral(x) -> Entitled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Fianna is limbic. Big, probing things are not limbic. If something is limbic then it is probing. If something is probing and equipped then it is adient. All speaking things are not bare. All probing things are speaking. If something is limbic and not adient then it is not speaking. Fianna is equipped.", "logic": "\nLimbic(fianna)\nforall x (Adient(x) and Probing(x) -> not Limbic(x))\nforall x (Limbic(x) -> Probing(x))\nforall x (Probing(x) and Equipped(x) -> Adient(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) -> not Bare(x))\nforall x (Probing(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Limbic(x) and not Adient(x) -> not Speaking(x))\n\nEquipped(fianna)\n\nEquipped(fianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "The gisela rearm the lesli. The gisela rearm the hurley. The gisela is carved. The gisela is crooked. The gisela venerate the lesli. The lesli rearm the hurley. The lesli is beforehand. The lesli is crooked. The lesli venerate the gisela. The hurley spring the gisela. The hurley spring the lesli. The hurley rearm the gisela. The hurley rearm the lesli. The hurley is beforehand. The hurley venerate the gisela. The hurley venerate the lesli. If the lesli spring the gisela and the gisela rearm the hurley then the lesli is unsatiated. If something rearm the gisela then it venerate the gisela. If something venerate the hurley then it rearm the gisela. If the gisela rearm the hurley and the hurley venerate the lesli then the gisela venerate the lesli. If something spring the hurley and the hurley spring the lesli then the hurley is unsatiated. If something venerate the hurley then it spring the gisela. If something spring the gisela then the gisela venerate the hurley. If the hurley rearm the lesli and the hurley is unsatiated then the hurley venerate the lesli. The gisela is carved.", "logic": "\nRearm(gisela, lesli)\nRearm(gisela, hurley)\nCarved(gisela)\nCrooked(gisela)\nVenerate(gisela, lesli)\nRearm(lesli, hurley)\nBeforehand(lesli)\nCrooked(lesli)\nVenerate(lesli, gisela)\nSpring(hurley, gisela)\nSpring(hurley, lesli)\nRearm(hurley, gisela)\nRearm(hurley, lesli)\nBeforehand(hurley)\nVenerate(hurley, gisela)\nVenerate(hurley, lesli)\nSpring(lesli, gisela) and Rearm(gisela, hurley) -> Unsatiated(lesli)\nforall x (Rearm(x, gisela) -> Venerate(x, gisela))\nforall x (Venerate(x, hurley) -> Rearm(x, gisela))\nRearm(gisela, hurley) and Venerate(hurley, lesli) -> Venerate(gisela, lesli)\nforall x (Spring(x, hurley) and Spring(hurley, lesli) -> Unsatiated(hurley))\nforall x (Venerate(x, hurley) -> Spring(x, gisela))\nforall x (Spring(x, gisela) -> Venerate(gisela, hurley))\nRearm(hurley, lesli) and Unsatiated(hurley) -> Venerate(hurley, lesli)\n\nCarved(gisela)\n\ntherefore Carved(gisela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The rees fleer the sheilah. The rees fleer the dolli. The rees is perplexing. The rees is loyal. The rees coronate the sheilah. The sheilah fleer the dolli. The sheilah is uniparous. The sheilah is loyal. The sheilah coronate the rees. The dolli parry the rees. The dolli parry the sheilah. The dolli fleer the rees. The dolli fleer the sheilah. The dolli is uniparous. The dolli coronate the rees. The dolli coronate the sheilah. If the sheilah parry the rees and the rees fleer the dolli then the sheilah is acceptive. If something fleer the rees then it coronate the rees. If something coronate the dolli then it fleer the rees. If the rees fleer the dolli and the dolli coronate the sheilah then the rees coronate the sheilah. If something parry the dolli and the dolli parry the sheilah then the dolli is acceptive. If something coronate the dolli then it parry the rees. If something parry the rees then the rees coronate the dolli. If the dolli fleer the sheilah and the dolli is acceptive then the dolli coronate the sheilah. The dolli does not need the rees.", "logic": "\nFleer(rees, sheilah)\nFleer(rees, dolli)\nPerplexing(rees)\nLoyal(rees)\nCoronate(rees, sheilah)\nFleer(sheilah, dolli)\nUniparous(sheilah)\nLoyal(sheilah)\nCoronate(sheilah, rees)\nParry(dolli, rees)\nParry(dolli, sheilah)\nFleer(dolli, rees)\nFleer(dolli, sheilah)\nUniparous(dolli)\nCoronate(dolli, rees)\nCoronate(dolli, sheilah)\nParry(sheilah, rees) and Fleer(rees, dolli) -> Acceptive(sheilah)\nforall x (Fleer(x, rees) -> Coronate(x, rees))\nforall x (Coronate(x, dolli) -> Fleer(x, rees))\nFleer(rees, dolli) and Coronate(dolli, sheilah) -> Coronate(rees, sheilah)\nforall x (Parry(x, dolli) and Parry(dolli, sheilah) -> Acceptive(dolli))\nforall x (Coronate(x, dolli) -> Parry(x, rees))\nforall x (Parry(x, rees) -> Coronate(rees, dolli))\nFleer(dolli, sheilah) and Acceptive(dolli) -> Coronate(dolli, sheilah)\n\nnot Coronate(dolli, rees)\n\ntherefore Coronate(dolli, rees)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The luana paint the flor. The luana paint the heloise. The luana is unbeholden. The luana is lustreless. The luana inunct the flor. The flor paint the heloise. The flor is completing. The flor is lustreless. The flor inunct the luana. The heloise limber the luana. The heloise limber the flor. The heloise paint the luana. The heloise paint the flor. The heloise is completing. The heloise inunct the luana. The heloise inunct the flor. If the flor limber the luana and the luana paint the heloise then the flor is shaky. If something paint the luana then it inunct the luana. If something inunct the heloise then it paint the luana. If the luana paint the heloise and the heloise inunct the flor then the luana inunct the flor. If something limber the heloise and the heloise limber the flor then the heloise is shaky. If something inunct the heloise then it limber the luana. If something limber the luana then the luana inunct the heloise. If the heloise paint the flor and the heloise is shaky then the heloise inunct the flor. The luana inunct the heloise.", "logic": "\nPaint(luana, flor)\nPaint(luana, heloise)\nUnbeholden(luana)\nLustreless(luana)\nInunct(luana, flor)\nPaint(flor, heloise)\nCompleting(flor)\nLustreless(flor)\nInunct(flor, luana)\nLimber(heloise, luana)\nLimber(heloise, flor)\nPaint(heloise, luana)\nPaint(heloise, flor)\nCompleting(heloise)\nInunct(heloise, luana)\nInunct(heloise, flor)\nLimber(flor, luana) and Paint(luana, heloise) -> Shaky(flor)\nforall x (Paint(x, luana) -> Inunct(x, luana))\nforall x (Inunct(x, heloise) -> Paint(x, luana))\nPaint(luana, heloise) and Inunct(heloise, flor) -> Inunct(luana, flor)\nforall x (Limber(x, heloise) and Limber(heloise, flor) -> Shaky(heloise))\nforall x (Inunct(x, heloise) -> Limber(x, luana))\nforall x (Limber(x, luana) -> Inunct(luana, heloise))\nPaint(heloise, flor) and Shaky(heloise) -> Inunct(heloise, flor)\n\nInunct(luana, heloise)\n\nLimber(heloise, luana) and forall x (Limber(x, luana) -> Inunct(luana, heloise)) -> therefore Inunct(luana, heloise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The lewis melt the andrzej. The lewis melt the avis. The lewis is auxetic. The lewis is phyletic. The lewis piece the andrzej. The andrzej melt the avis. The andrzej is tranquil. The andrzej is phyletic. The andrzej piece the lewis. The avis disband the lewis. The avis disband the andrzej. The avis melt the lewis. The avis melt the andrzej. The avis is tranquil. The avis piece the lewis. The avis piece the andrzej. If the andrzej disband the lewis and the lewis melt the avis then the andrzej is enveloping. If something melt the lewis then it piece the lewis. If something piece the avis then it melt the lewis. If the lewis melt the avis and the avis piece the andrzej then the lewis piece the andrzej. If something disband the avis and the avis disband the andrzej then the avis is enveloping. If something piece the avis then it disband the lewis. If something disband the lewis then the lewis piece the avis. If the avis melt the andrzej and the avis is enveloping then the avis piece the andrzej. The lewis does not need the avis.", "logic": "\nMelt(lewis, andrzej)\nMelt(lewis, avis)\nAuxetic(lewis)\nPhyletic(lewis)\nPiece(lewis, andrzej)\nMelt(andrzej, avis)\nTranquil(andrzej)\nPhyletic(andrzej)\nPiece(andrzej, lewis)\nDisband(avis, lewis)\nDisband(avis, andrzej)\nMelt(avis, lewis)\nMelt(avis, andrzej)\nTranquil(avis)\nPiece(avis, lewis)\nPiece(avis, andrzej)\nDisband(andrzej, lewis) and Melt(lewis, avis) -> Enveloping(andrzej)\nforall x (Melt(x, lewis) -> Piece(x, lewis))\nforall x (Piece(x, avis) -> Melt(x, lewis))\nMelt(lewis, avis) and Piece(avis, andrzej) -> Piece(lewis, andrzej)\nforall x (Disband(x, avis) and Disband(avis, andrzej) -> Enveloping(avis))\nforall x (Piece(x, avis) -> Disband(x, lewis))\nforall x (Disband(x, lewis) -> Piece(lewis, avis))\nMelt(avis, andrzej) and Enveloping(avis) -> Piece(avis, andrzej)\n\nnot Piece(lewis, avis)\n\nDisband(avis, lewis) and forall x (Disband(x, lewis) -> Piece(lewis, avis)) -> therefore Piece(lewis, avis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The chrissa indue the paola. The chrissa indue the tharen. The chrissa is reinforced. The chrissa is carbuncled. The chrissa champ the paola. The paola indue the tharen. The paola is articled. The paola is carbuncled. The paola champ the chrissa. The tharen acerbate the chrissa. The tharen acerbate the paola. The tharen indue the chrissa. The tharen indue the paola. The tharen is articled. The tharen champ the chrissa. The tharen champ the paola. If the paola acerbate the chrissa and the chrissa indue the tharen then the paola is decreasing. If something indue the chrissa then it champ the chrissa. If something champ the tharen then it indue the chrissa. If the chrissa indue the tharen and the tharen champ the paola then the chrissa champ the paola. If something acerbate the tharen and the tharen acerbate the paola then the tharen is decreasing. If something champ the tharen then it acerbate the chrissa. If something acerbate the chrissa then the chrissa champ the tharen. If the tharen indue the paola and the tharen is decreasing then the tharen champ the paola. The chrissa indue the chrissa.", "logic": "\nIndue(chrissa, paola)\nIndue(chrissa, tharen)\nReinforced(chrissa)\nCarbuncled(chrissa)\nChamp(chrissa, paola)\nIndue(paola, tharen)\nArticled(paola)\nCarbuncled(paola)\nChamp(paola, chrissa)\nAcerbate(tharen, chrissa)\nAcerbate(tharen, paola)\nIndue(tharen, chrissa)\nIndue(tharen, paola)\nArticled(tharen)\nChamp(tharen, chrissa)\nChamp(tharen, paola)\nAcerbate(paola, chrissa) and Indue(chrissa, tharen) -> Decreasing(paola)\nforall x (Indue(x, chrissa) -> Champ(x, chrissa))\nforall x (Champ(x, tharen) -> Indue(x, chrissa))\nIndue(chrissa, tharen) and Champ(tharen, paola) -> Champ(chrissa, paola)\nforall x (Acerbate(x, tharen) and Acerbate(tharen, paola) -> Decreasing(tharen))\nforall x (Champ(x, tharen) -> Acerbate(x, chrissa))\nforall x (Acerbate(x, chrissa) -> Champ(chrissa, tharen))\nIndue(tharen, paola) and Decreasing(tharen) -> Champ(tharen, paola)\n\nIndue(chrissa, chrissa)\n\nAcerbate(tharen, chrissa) and forall x (Acerbate(x, chrissa) -> Champ(chrissa, tharen)) -> therefore Champ(chrissa, tharen) Champ(chrissa, tharen) and forall x (Champ(x, tharen) -> Indue(x, chrissa)) -> therefore Indue(chrissa, chrissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The hall stalk the henri. The hall stalk the timothy. The hall is thankful. The hall is velvet. The hall gauffer the henri. The henri stalk the timothy. The henri is waterless. The henri is velvet. The henri gauffer the hall. The timothy dumbfound the hall. The timothy dumbfound the henri. The timothy stalk the hall. The timothy stalk the henri. The timothy is waterless. The timothy gauffer the hall. The timothy gauffer the henri. If the henri dumbfound the hall and the hall stalk the timothy then the henri is turbulent. If something stalk the hall then it gauffer the hall. If something gauffer the timothy then it stalk the hall. If the hall stalk the timothy and the timothy gauffer the henri then the hall gauffer the henri. If something dumbfound the timothy and the timothy dumbfound the henri then the timothy is turbulent. If something gauffer the timothy then it dumbfound the hall. If something dumbfound the hall then the hall gauffer the timothy. If the timothy stalk the henri and the timothy is turbulent then the timothy gauffer the henri. The hall does not chase the hall.", "logic": "\nStalk(hall, henri)\nStalk(hall, timothy)\nThankful(hall)\nVelvet(hall)\nGauffer(hall, henri)\nStalk(henri, timothy)\nWaterless(henri)\nVelvet(henri)\nGauffer(henri, hall)\nDumbfound(timothy, hall)\nDumbfound(timothy, henri)\nStalk(timothy, hall)\nStalk(timothy, henri)\nWaterless(timothy)\nGauffer(timothy, hall)\nGauffer(timothy, henri)\nDumbfound(henri, hall) and Stalk(hall, timothy) -> Turbulent(henri)\nforall x (Stalk(x, hall) -> Gauffer(x, hall))\nforall x (Gauffer(x, timothy) -> Stalk(x, hall))\nStalk(hall, timothy) and Gauffer(timothy, henri) -> Gauffer(hall, henri)\nforall x (Dumbfound(x, timothy) and Dumbfound(timothy, henri) -> Turbulent(timothy))\nforall x (Gauffer(x, timothy) -> Dumbfound(x, hall))\nforall x (Dumbfound(x, hall) -> Gauffer(hall, timothy))\nStalk(timothy, henri) and Turbulent(timothy) -> Gauffer(timothy, henri)\n\nnot Dumbfound(hall, hall)\n\nDumbfound(timothy, hall) and forall x (Dumbfound(x, hall) -> Gauffer(hall, timothy)) -> therefore Gauffer(hall, timothy) Gauffer(hall, timothy) and forall x (Gauffer(x, timothy) -> Dumbfound(x, hall)) -> therefore Dumbfound(hall, hall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The ninnette forefend the kial. The ninnette forefend the shelbi. The ninnette is brahminic. The ninnette is plumlike. The ninnette stenograph the kial. The kial forefend the shelbi. The kial is offside. The kial is plumlike. The kial stenograph the ninnette. The shelbi oust the ninnette. The shelbi oust the kial. The shelbi forefend the ninnette. The shelbi forefend the kial. The shelbi is offside. The shelbi stenograph the ninnette. The shelbi stenograph the kial. If the kial oust the ninnette and the ninnette forefend the shelbi then the kial is married. If something forefend the ninnette then it stenograph the ninnette. If something stenograph the shelbi then it forefend the ninnette. If the ninnette forefend the shelbi and the shelbi stenograph the kial then the ninnette stenograph the kial. If something oust the shelbi and the shelbi oust the kial then the shelbi is married. If something stenograph the shelbi then it oust the ninnette. If something oust the ninnette then the ninnette stenograph the shelbi. If the shelbi forefend the kial and the shelbi is married then the shelbi stenograph the kial. The ninnette stenograph the ninnette.", "logic": "\nForefend(ninnette, kial)\nForefend(ninnette, shelbi)\nBrahminic(ninnette)\nPlumlike(ninnette)\nStenograph(ninnette, kial)\nForefend(kial, shelbi)\nOffside(kial)\nPlumlike(kial)\nStenograph(kial, ninnette)\nOust(shelbi, ninnette)\nOust(shelbi, kial)\nForefend(shelbi, ninnette)\nForefend(shelbi, kial)\nOffside(shelbi)\nStenograph(shelbi, ninnette)\nStenograph(shelbi, kial)\nOust(kial, ninnette) and Forefend(ninnette, shelbi) -> Married(kial)\nforall x (Forefend(x, ninnette) -> Stenograph(x, ninnette))\nforall x (Stenograph(x, shelbi) -> Forefend(x, ninnette))\nForefend(ninnette, shelbi) and Stenograph(shelbi, kial) -> Stenograph(ninnette, kial)\nforall x (Oust(x, shelbi) and Oust(shelbi, kial) -> Married(shelbi))\nforall x (Stenograph(x, shelbi) -> Oust(x, ninnette))\nforall x (Oust(x, ninnette) -> Stenograph(ninnette, shelbi))\nForefend(shelbi, kial) and Married(shelbi) -> Stenograph(shelbi, kial)\n\nStenograph(ninnette, ninnette)\n\nOust(shelbi, ninnette) and forall x (Oust(x, ninnette) -> Stenograph(ninnette, shelbi)) -> therefore Stenograph(ninnette, shelbi) Stenograph(ninnette, shelbi) and forall x (Stenograph(x, shelbi) -> Forefend(x, ninnette)) -> therefore Forefend(ninnette, ninnette) Forefend(ninnette, ninnette) and forall x (Forefend(x, ninnette) -> Stenograph(x, ninnette)) -> therefore Stenograph(ninnette, ninnette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The rob crown the jorge. The rob crown the anstice. The rob is costate. The rob is rebellious. The rob adjust the jorge. The jorge crown the anstice. The jorge is unfirm. The jorge is rebellious. The jorge adjust the rob. The anstice rotate the rob. The anstice rotate the jorge. The anstice crown the rob. The anstice crown the jorge. The anstice is unfirm. The anstice adjust the rob. The anstice adjust the jorge. If the jorge rotate the rob and the rob crown the anstice then the jorge is grownup. If something crown the rob then it adjust the rob. If something adjust the anstice then it crown the rob. If the rob crown the anstice and the anstice adjust the jorge then the rob adjust the jorge. If something rotate the anstice and the anstice rotate the jorge then the anstice is grownup. If something adjust the anstice then it rotate the rob. If something rotate the rob then the rob adjust the anstice. If the anstice crown the jorge and the anstice is grownup then the anstice adjust the jorge. The rob does not need the rob.", "logic": "\nCrown(rob, jorge)\nCrown(rob, anstice)\nCostate(rob)\nRebellious(rob)\nAdjust(rob, jorge)\nCrown(jorge, anstice)\nUnfirm(jorge)\nRebellious(jorge)\nAdjust(jorge, rob)\nRotate(anstice, rob)\nRotate(anstice, jorge)\nCrown(anstice, rob)\nCrown(anstice, jorge)\nUnfirm(anstice)\nAdjust(anstice, rob)\nAdjust(anstice, jorge)\nRotate(jorge, rob) and Crown(rob, anstice) -> Grownup(jorge)\nforall x (Crown(x, rob) -> Adjust(x, rob))\nforall x (Adjust(x, anstice) -> Crown(x, rob))\nCrown(rob, anstice) and Adjust(anstice, jorge) -> Adjust(rob, jorge)\nforall x (Rotate(x, anstice) and Rotate(anstice, jorge) -> Grownup(anstice))\nforall x (Adjust(x, anstice) -> Rotate(x, rob))\nforall x (Rotate(x, rob) -> Adjust(rob, anstice))\nCrown(anstice, jorge) and Grownup(anstice) -> Adjust(anstice, jorge)\n\nnot Adjust(rob, rob)\n\nRotate(anstice, rob) and forall x (Rotate(x, rob) -> Adjust(rob, anstice)) -> therefore Adjust(rob, anstice) Adjust(rob, anstice) and forall x (Adjust(x, anstice) -> Crown(x, rob)) -> therefore Crown(rob, rob) Crown(rob, rob) and forall x (Crown(x, rob) -> Adjust(x, rob)) -> therefore Adjust(rob, rob)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The stewart disarm the annabel. The stewart disarm the nelie. The stewart is emboldened. The stewart is abducent. The stewart starboard the annabel. The annabel disarm the nelie. The annabel is partitive. The annabel is abducent. The annabel starboard the stewart. The nelie adjust the stewart. The nelie adjust the annabel. The nelie disarm the stewart. The nelie disarm the annabel. The nelie is partitive. The nelie starboard the stewart. The nelie starboard the annabel. If the annabel adjust the stewart and the stewart disarm the nelie then the annabel is feeble. If something disarm the stewart then it starboard the stewart. If something starboard the nelie then it disarm the stewart. If the stewart disarm the nelie and the nelie starboard the annabel then the stewart starboard the annabel. If something adjust the nelie and the nelie adjust the annabel then the nelie is feeble. If something starboard the nelie then it adjust the stewart. If something adjust the stewart then the stewart starboard the nelie. If the nelie disarm the annabel and the nelie is feeble then the nelie starboard the annabel. The annabel is not feeble.", "logic": "\nDisarm(stewart, annabel)\nDisarm(stewart, nelie)\nEmboldened(stewart)\nAbducent(stewart)\nStarboard(stewart, annabel)\nDisarm(annabel, nelie)\nPartitive(annabel)\nAbducent(annabel)\nStarboard(annabel, stewart)\nAdjust(nelie, stewart)\nAdjust(nelie, annabel)\nDisarm(nelie, stewart)\nDisarm(nelie, annabel)\nPartitive(nelie)\nStarboard(nelie, stewart)\nStarboard(nelie, annabel)\nAdjust(annabel, stewart) and Disarm(stewart, nelie) -> Feeble(annabel)\nforall x (Disarm(x, stewart) -> Starboard(x, stewart))\nforall x (Starboard(x, nelie) -> Disarm(x, stewart))\nDisarm(stewart, nelie) and Starboard(nelie, annabel) -> Starboard(stewart, annabel)\nforall x (Adjust(x, nelie) and Adjust(nelie, annabel) -> Feeble(nelie))\nforall x (Starboard(x, nelie) -> Adjust(x, stewart))\nforall x (Adjust(x, stewart) -> Starboard(stewart, nelie))\nDisarm(nelie, annabel) and Feeble(nelie) -> Starboard(nelie, annabel)\n\nnot Feeble(annabel)\n\nAdjust(annabel, stewart) and Disarm(stewart, nelie) -> Feeble(annabel) <- forall x (Starboard(x, nelie) -> Adjust(x, stewart)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The kaitlin stand the goldina. The kaitlin stand the ethan. The kaitlin is petulant. The kaitlin is finespun. The kaitlin dispossess the goldina. The goldina stand the ethan. The goldina is hifalutin. The goldina is finespun. The goldina dispossess the kaitlin. The ethan unbar the kaitlin. The ethan unbar the goldina. The ethan stand the kaitlin. The ethan stand the goldina. The ethan is hifalutin. The ethan dispossess the kaitlin. The ethan dispossess the goldina. If the goldina unbar the kaitlin and the kaitlin stand the ethan then the goldina is chylaceous. If something stand the kaitlin then it dispossess the kaitlin. If something dispossess the ethan then it stand the kaitlin. If the kaitlin stand the ethan and the ethan dispossess the goldina then the kaitlin dispossess the goldina. If something unbar the ethan and the ethan unbar the goldina then the ethan is chylaceous. If something dispossess the ethan then it unbar the kaitlin. If something unbar the kaitlin then the kaitlin dispossess the ethan. If the ethan stand the goldina and the ethan is chylaceous then the ethan dispossess the goldina. The ethan is chylaceous.", "logic": "\nStand(kaitlin, goldina)\nStand(kaitlin, ethan)\nPetulant(kaitlin)\nFinespun(kaitlin)\nDispossess(kaitlin, goldina)\nStand(goldina, ethan)\nHifalutin(goldina)\nFinespun(goldina)\nDispossess(goldina, kaitlin)\nUnbar(ethan, kaitlin)\nUnbar(ethan, goldina)\nStand(ethan, kaitlin)\nStand(ethan, goldina)\nHifalutin(ethan)\nDispossess(ethan, kaitlin)\nDispossess(ethan, goldina)\nUnbar(goldina, kaitlin) and Stand(kaitlin, ethan) -> Chylaceous(goldina)\nforall x (Stand(x, kaitlin) -> Dispossess(x, kaitlin))\nforall x (Dispossess(x, ethan) -> Stand(x, kaitlin))\nStand(kaitlin, ethan) and Dispossess(ethan, goldina) -> Dispossess(kaitlin, goldina)\nforall x (Unbar(x, ethan) and Unbar(ethan, goldina) -> Chylaceous(ethan))\nforall x (Dispossess(x, ethan) -> Unbar(x, kaitlin))\nforall x (Unbar(x, kaitlin) -> Dispossess(kaitlin, ethan))\nStand(ethan, goldina) and Chylaceous(ethan) -> Dispossess(ethan, goldina)\n\nChylaceous(ethan)\n\nforall x (Unbar(x, ethan) and Unbar(ethan, goldina) -> Chylaceous(ethan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The tomasina juggle the ardith. The tomasina juggle the wakefield. The tomasina is hindmost. The tomasina is outdoor. The tomasina welch the ardith. The ardith juggle the wakefield. The ardith is breasted. The ardith is outdoor. The ardith welch the tomasina. The wakefield screen the tomasina. The wakefield screen the ardith. The wakefield juggle the tomasina. The wakefield juggle the ardith. The wakefield is breasted. The wakefield welch the tomasina. The wakefield welch the ardith. If the ardith screen the tomasina and the tomasina juggle the wakefield then the ardith is witty. If something juggle the tomasina then it welch the tomasina. If something welch the wakefield then it juggle the tomasina. If the tomasina juggle the wakefield and the wakefield welch the ardith then the tomasina welch the ardith. If something screen the wakefield and the wakefield screen the ardith then the wakefield is witty. If something welch the wakefield then it screen the tomasina. If something screen the tomasina then the tomasina welch the wakefield. If the wakefield juggle the ardith and the wakefield is witty then the wakefield welch the ardith. The ardith does not chase the tomasina.", "logic": "\nJuggle(tomasina, ardith)\nJuggle(tomasina, wakefield)\nHindmost(tomasina)\nOutdoor(tomasina)\nWelch(tomasina, ardith)\nJuggle(ardith, wakefield)\nBreasted(ardith)\nOutdoor(ardith)\nWelch(ardith, tomasina)\nScreen(wakefield, tomasina)\nScreen(wakefield, ardith)\nJuggle(wakefield, tomasina)\nJuggle(wakefield, ardith)\nBreasted(wakefield)\nWelch(wakefield, tomasina)\nWelch(wakefield, ardith)\nScreen(ardith, tomasina) and Juggle(tomasina, wakefield) -> Witty(ardith)\nforall x (Juggle(x, tomasina) -> Welch(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Welch(x, wakefield) -> Juggle(x, tomasina))\nJuggle(tomasina, wakefield) and Welch(wakefield, ardith) -> Welch(tomasina, ardith)\nforall x (Screen(x, wakefield) and Screen(wakefield, ardith) -> Witty(wakefield))\nforall x (Welch(x, wakefield) -> Screen(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Screen(x, tomasina) -> Welch(tomasina, wakefield))\nJuggle(wakefield, ardith) and Witty(wakefield) -> Welch(wakefield, ardith)\n\nnot Screen(ardith, tomasina)\n\nforall x (Welch(x, wakefield) -> Screen(x, tomasina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The teodor kotow the frances. The teodor kotow the tarra. The teodor is coolheaded. The teodor is buttressed. The teodor expound the frances. The frances kotow the tarra. The frances is unmarred. The frances is buttressed. The frances expound the teodor. The tarra snigger the teodor. The tarra snigger the frances. The tarra kotow the teodor. The tarra kotow the frances. The tarra is unmarred. The tarra expound the teodor. The tarra expound the frances. If the frances snigger the teodor and the teodor kotow the tarra then the frances is driving. If something kotow the teodor then it expound the teodor. If something expound the tarra then it kotow the teodor. If the teodor kotow the tarra and the tarra expound the frances then the teodor expound the frances. If something snigger the tarra and the tarra snigger the frances then the tarra is driving. If something expound the tarra then it snigger the teodor. If something snigger the teodor then the teodor expound the tarra. If the tarra kotow the frances and the tarra is driving then the tarra expound the frances. The frances kotow the teodor.", "logic": "\nKotow(teodor, frances)\nKotow(teodor, tarra)\nCoolheaded(teodor)\nButtressed(teodor)\nExpound(teodor, frances)\nKotow(frances, tarra)\nUnmarred(frances)\nButtressed(frances)\nExpound(frances, teodor)\nSnigger(tarra, teodor)\nSnigger(tarra, frances)\nKotow(tarra, teodor)\nKotow(tarra, frances)\nUnmarred(tarra)\nExpound(tarra, teodor)\nExpound(tarra, frances)\nSnigger(frances, teodor) and Kotow(teodor, tarra) -> Driving(frances)\nforall x (Kotow(x, teodor) -> Expound(x, teodor))\nforall x (Expound(x, tarra) -> Kotow(x, teodor))\nKotow(teodor, tarra) and Expound(tarra, frances) -> Expound(teodor, frances)\nforall x (Snigger(x, tarra) and Snigger(tarra, frances) -> Driving(tarra))\nforall x (Expound(x, tarra) -> Snigger(x, teodor))\nforall x (Snigger(x, teodor) -> Expound(teodor, tarra))\nKotow(tarra, frances) and Driving(tarra) -> Expound(tarra, frances)\n\nKotow(frances, teodor)\n\nforall x (Expound(x, tarra) -> Kotow(x, teodor)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The rochester empale the cosette. The rochester empale the devan. The rochester is nutritious. The rochester is etched. The rochester milk the cosette. The cosette empale the devan. The cosette is actionable. The cosette is etched. The cosette milk the rochester. The devan suffix the rochester. The devan suffix the cosette. The devan empale the rochester. The devan empale the cosette. The devan is actionable. The devan milk the rochester. The devan milk the cosette. If the cosette suffix the rochester and the rochester empale the devan then the cosette is positivist. If something empale the rochester then it milk the rochester. If something milk the devan then it empale the rochester. If the rochester empale the devan and the devan milk the cosette then the rochester milk the cosette. If something suffix the devan and the devan suffix the cosette then the devan is positivist. If something milk the devan then it suffix the rochester. If something suffix the rochester then the rochester milk the devan. If the devan empale the cosette and the devan is positivist then the devan milk the cosette. The devan is not etched.", "logic": "\nEmpale(rochester, cosette)\nEmpale(rochester, devan)\nNutritious(rochester)\nEtched(rochester)\nMilk(rochester, cosette)\nEmpale(cosette, devan)\nActionable(cosette)\nEtched(cosette)\nMilk(cosette, rochester)\nSuffix(devan, rochester)\nSuffix(devan, cosette)\nEmpale(devan, rochester)\nEmpale(devan, cosette)\nActionable(devan)\nMilk(devan, rochester)\nMilk(devan, cosette)\nSuffix(cosette, rochester) and Empale(rochester, devan) -> Positivist(cosette)\nforall x (Empale(x, rochester) -> Milk(x, rochester))\nforall x (Milk(x, devan) -> Empale(x, rochester))\nEmpale(rochester, devan) and Milk(devan, cosette) -> Milk(rochester, cosette)\nforall x (Suffix(x, devan) and Suffix(devan, cosette) -> Positivist(devan))\nforall x (Milk(x, devan) -> Suffix(x, rochester))\nforall x (Suffix(x, rochester) -> Milk(rochester, devan))\nEmpale(devan, cosette) and Positivist(devan) -> Milk(devan, cosette)\n\nnot Etched(devan)\n\nnot Etched(devan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The dion robe the emeline. The dion robe the kirstie. The dion is blastular. The dion is caducean. The dion poniard the emeline. The emeline robe the kirstie. The emeline is uncoiled. The emeline is caducean. The emeline poniard the dion. The kirstie mash the dion. The kirstie mash the emeline. The kirstie robe the dion. The kirstie robe the emeline. The kirstie is uncoiled. The kirstie poniard the dion. The kirstie poniard the emeline. If the emeline mash the dion and the dion robe the kirstie then the emeline is memberless. If something robe the dion then it poniard the dion. If something poniard the kirstie then it robe the dion. If the dion robe the kirstie and the kirstie poniard the emeline then the dion poniard the emeline. If something mash the kirstie and the kirstie mash the emeline then the kirstie is memberless. If something poniard the kirstie then it mash the dion. If something mash the dion then the dion poniard the kirstie. If the kirstie robe the emeline and the kirstie is memberless then the kirstie poniard the emeline. The dion mash the kirstie.", "logic": "\nRobe(dion, emeline)\nRobe(dion, kirstie)\nBlastular(dion)\nCaducean(dion)\nPoniard(dion, emeline)\nRobe(emeline, kirstie)\nUncoiled(emeline)\nCaducean(emeline)\nPoniard(emeline, dion)\nMash(kirstie, dion)\nMash(kirstie, emeline)\nRobe(kirstie, dion)\nRobe(kirstie, emeline)\nUncoiled(kirstie)\nPoniard(kirstie, dion)\nPoniard(kirstie, emeline)\nMash(emeline, dion) and Robe(dion, kirstie) -> Memberless(emeline)\nforall x (Robe(x, dion) -> Poniard(x, dion))\nforall x (Poniard(x, kirstie) -> Robe(x, dion))\nRobe(dion, kirstie) and Poniard(kirstie, emeline) -> Poniard(dion, emeline)\nforall x (Mash(x, kirstie) and Mash(kirstie, emeline) -> Memberless(kirstie))\nforall x (Poniard(x, kirstie) -> Mash(x, dion))\nforall x (Mash(x, dion) -> Poniard(dion, kirstie))\nRobe(kirstie, emeline) and Memberless(kirstie) -> Poniard(kirstie, emeline)\n\nMash(dion, kirstie)\n\nMash(dion, kirstie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The honey boycott the hadria. The honey boycott the donielle. The honey is lxxviii. The honey is diurnal. The honey begild the hadria. The hadria boycott the donielle. The hadria is epigastric. The hadria is diurnal. The hadria begild the honey. The donielle housekeep the honey. The donielle housekeep the hadria. The donielle boycott the honey. The donielle boycott the hadria. The donielle is epigastric. The donielle begild the honey. The donielle begild the hadria. If the hadria housekeep the honey and the honey boycott the donielle then the hadria is azido. If something boycott the honey then it begild the honey. If something begild the donielle then it boycott the honey. If the honey boycott the donielle and the donielle begild the hadria then the honey begild the hadria. If something housekeep the donielle and the donielle housekeep the hadria then the donielle is azido. If something begild the donielle then it housekeep the honey. If something housekeep the honey then the honey begild the donielle. If the donielle boycott the hadria and the donielle is azido then the donielle begild the hadria. The donielle does not chase the donielle.", "logic": "\nBoycott(honey, hadria)\nBoycott(honey, donielle)\nLxxviii(honey)\nDiurnal(honey)\nBegild(honey, hadria)\nBoycott(hadria, donielle)\nEpigastric(hadria)\nDiurnal(hadria)\nBegild(hadria, honey)\nHousekeep(donielle, honey)\nHousekeep(donielle, hadria)\nBoycott(donielle, honey)\nBoycott(donielle, hadria)\nEpigastric(donielle)\nBegild(donielle, honey)\nBegild(donielle, hadria)\nHousekeep(hadria, honey) and Boycott(honey, donielle) -> Azido(hadria)\nforall x (Boycott(x, honey) -> Begild(x, honey))\nforall x (Begild(x, donielle) -> Boycott(x, honey))\nBoycott(honey, donielle) and Begild(donielle, hadria) -> Begild(honey, hadria)\nforall x (Housekeep(x, donielle) and Housekeep(donielle, hadria) -> Azido(donielle))\nforall x (Begild(x, donielle) -> Housekeep(x, honey))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, honey) -> Begild(honey, donielle))\nBoycott(donielle, hadria) and Azido(donielle) -> Begild(donielle, hadria)\n\nnot Housekeep(donielle, donielle)\n\nnot Housekeep(donielle, donielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The gerta rasterize the meara. The gerta rasterize the tore. The gerta is blotched. The gerta is roiled. The gerta splatter the meara. The meara rasterize the tore. The meara is campestral. The meara is roiled. The meara splatter the gerta. The tore massacre the gerta. The tore massacre the meara. The tore rasterize the gerta. The tore rasterize the meara. The tore is campestral. The tore splatter the gerta. The tore splatter the meara. If the meara massacre the gerta and the gerta rasterize the tore then the meara is spongelike. If something rasterize the gerta then it splatter the gerta. If something splatter the tore then it rasterize the gerta. If the gerta rasterize the tore and the tore splatter the meara then the gerta splatter the meara. If something massacre the tore and the tore massacre the meara then the tore is spongelike. If something splatter the tore then it massacre the gerta. If something massacre the gerta then the gerta splatter the tore. If the tore rasterize the meara and the tore is spongelike then the tore splatter the meara. The gerta is kind.", "logic": "\nRasterize(gerta, meara)\nRasterize(gerta, tore)\nBlotched(gerta)\nRoiled(gerta)\nSplatter(gerta, meara)\nRasterize(meara, tore)\nCampestral(meara)\nRoiled(meara)\nSplatter(meara, gerta)\nMassacre(tore, gerta)\nMassacre(tore, meara)\nRasterize(tore, gerta)\nRasterize(tore, meara)\nCampestral(tore)\nSplatter(tore, gerta)\nSplatter(tore, meara)\nMassacre(meara, gerta) and Rasterize(gerta, tore) -> Spongelike(meara)\nforall x (Rasterize(x, gerta) -> Splatter(x, gerta))\nforall x (Splatter(x, tore) -> Rasterize(x, gerta))\nRasterize(gerta, tore) and Splatter(tore, meara) -> Splatter(gerta, meara)\nforall x (Massacre(x, tore) and Massacre(tore, meara) -> Spongelike(tore))\nforall x (Splatter(x, tore) -> Massacre(x, gerta))\nforall x (Massacre(x, gerta) -> Splatter(gerta, tore))\nRasterize(tore, meara) and Spongelike(tore) -> Splatter(tore, meara)\n\nKind(gerta)\n\nKind(gerta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "Agathe is plumbous. Agathe is mohammedan. Hamlet is showy. Hamlet is mohammedan. Hamlet is apogamous. Lilla is apogamous. Giffer is puzzling. If something is grapey and mohammedan then it is puzzling. All plumbous things are grapey. If Agathe is puzzling then Agathe is bounderish. Hamlet is mohammedan.", "logic": "\nPlumbous(agathe)\nMohammedan(agathe)\nShowy(hamlet)\nMohammedan(hamlet)\nApogamous(hamlet)\nApogamous(lilla)\nPuzzling(giffer)\nforall x (Grapey(x) and Mohammedan(x) -> Puzzling(x))\nforall x (Plumbous(x) -> Grapey(x))\nPuzzling(agathe) -> Bounderish(agathe)\n\nMohammedan(hamlet)\n\ntherefore Mohammedan(hamlet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Tabbie is vast. Tabbie is plus. Jordan is outclassed. Jordan is plus. Jordan is ciliary. Avraham is ciliary. Cris is dished. If something is acentric and plus then it is dished. All vast things are acentric. If Tabbie is dished then Tabbie is lowering. Jordan is not plus.", "logic": "\nVast(tabbie)\nPlus(tabbie)\nOutclassed(jordan)\nPlus(jordan)\nCiliary(jordan)\nCiliary(avraham)\nDished(cris)\nforall x (Acentric(x) and Plus(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) -> Acentric(x))\nDished(tabbie) -> Lowering(tabbie)\n\nnot Plus(jordan)\n\ntherefore Plus(jordan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Lust is saprobic. Lust is adrift. Kaster is gallican. Kaster is adrift. Kaster is amused. Kellie is amused. Randolf is mousy. If something is bustling and adrift then it is mousy. All saprobic things are bustling. If Lust is mousy then Lust is yearlong. Lust is bustling.", "logic": "\nSaprobic(lust)\nAdrift(lust)\nGallican(kaster)\nAdrift(kaster)\nAmused(kaster)\nAmused(kellie)\nMousy(randolf)\nforall x (Bustling(x) and Adrift(x) -> Mousy(x))\nforall x (Saprobic(x) -> Bustling(x))\nMousy(lust) -> Yearlong(lust)\n\nBustling(lust)\n\nSaprobic(lust) and forall x (Saprobic(x) -> Bustling(x)) -> therefore Bustling(lust)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Thorny is vaned. Thorny is popular. Leif is carinate. Leif is popular. Leif is lank. Ailey is lank. Leonanie is rimmed. If something is uncurbed and popular then it is rimmed. All vaned things are uncurbed. If Thorny is rimmed then Thorny is buttony. Thorny is not uncurbed.", "logic": "\nVaned(thorny)\nPopular(thorny)\nCarinate(leif)\nPopular(leif)\nLank(leif)\nLank(ailey)\nRimmed(leonanie)\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) and Popular(x) -> Rimmed(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nRimmed(thorny) -> Buttony(thorny)\n\nnot Uncurbed(thorny)\n\nVaned(thorny) and forall x (Vaned(x) -> Uncurbed(x)) -> therefore Uncurbed(thorny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Sheril is voltaic. Sheril is promissory. Clancy is watercress. Clancy is promissory. Clancy is rugged. Juergen is rugged. Martin is generative. If something is idolised and promissory then it is generative. All voltaic things are idolised. If Sheril is generative then Sheril is cancellate. Sheril is generative.", "logic": "\nVoltaic(sheril)\nPromissory(sheril)\nWatercress(clancy)\nPromissory(clancy)\nRugged(clancy)\nRugged(juergen)\nGenerative(martin)\nforall x (Idolised(x) and Promissory(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) -> Idolised(x))\nGenerative(sheril) -> Cancellate(sheril)\n\nGenerative(sheril)\n\nVoltaic(sheril) and forall x (Voltaic(x) -> Idolised(x)) -> therefore Idolised(sheril) Idolised(sheril) and Promissory(sheril) and forall x (Idolised(x) and Promissory(x) -> Generative(x)) -> therefore Generative(sheril)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Hyman is bulbed. Hyman is substitute. Carrie is piscatory. Carrie is substitute. Carrie is clonal. Melvin is clonal. Hilarie is remorseful. If something is quasi and substitute then it is remorseful. All bulbed things are quasi. If Hyman is remorseful then Hyman is splayfoot. Hyman is not remorseful.", "logic": "\nBulbed(hyman)\nSubstitute(hyman)\nPiscatory(carrie)\nSubstitute(carrie)\nClonal(carrie)\nClonal(melvin)\nRemorseful(hilarie)\nforall x (Quasi(x) and Substitute(x) -> Remorseful(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) -> Quasi(x))\nRemorseful(hyman) -> Splayfoot(hyman)\n\nnot Remorseful(hyman)\n\nBulbed(hyman) and forall x (Bulbed(x) -> Quasi(x)) -> therefore Quasi(hyman) Quasi(hyman) and Substitute(hyman) and forall x (Quasi(x) and Substitute(x) -> Remorseful(x)) -> therefore Remorseful(hyman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Helmuth is sharpened. Helmuth is tractive. Kitti is amenable. Kitti is tractive. Kitti is naif. Peggy is naif. Jolynn is postural. If something is aware and tractive then it is postural. All sharpened things are aware. If Helmuth is postural then Helmuth is requested. Helmuth is requested.", "logic": "\nSharpened(helmuth)\nTractive(helmuth)\nAmenable(kitti)\nTractive(kitti)\nNaif(kitti)\nNaif(peggy)\nPostural(jolynn)\nforall x (Aware(x) and Tractive(x) -> Postural(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) -> Aware(x))\nPostural(helmuth) -> Requested(helmuth)\n\nRequested(helmuth)\n\nSharpened(helmuth) and forall x (Sharpened(x) -> Aware(x)) -> therefore Aware(helmuth) Aware(helmuth) and Tractive(helmuth) and forall x (Aware(x) and Tractive(x) -> Postural(x)) -> therefore Postural(helmuth) Postural(helmuth) and Postural(helmuth) -> Requested(helmuth) -> therefore Requested(helmuth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Gunilla is functional. Gunilla is extirpable. Neala is hopeful. Neala is extirpable. Neala is censorial. Duncan is censorial. Clare is triumphal. If something is clunky and extirpable then it is triumphal. All functional things are clunky. If Gunilla is triumphal then Gunilla is imaginable. Gunilla is not imaginable.", "logic": "\nFunctional(gunilla)\nExtirpable(gunilla)\nHopeful(neala)\nExtirpable(neala)\nCensorial(neala)\nCensorial(duncan)\nTriumphal(clare)\nforall x (Clunky(x) and Extirpable(x) -> Triumphal(x))\nforall x (Functional(x) -> Clunky(x))\nTriumphal(gunilla) -> Imaginable(gunilla)\n\nnot Imaginable(gunilla)\n\nFunctional(gunilla) and forall x (Functional(x) -> Clunky(x)) -> therefore Clunky(gunilla) Clunky(gunilla) and Extirpable(gunilla) and forall x (Clunky(x) and Extirpable(x) -> Triumphal(x)) -> therefore Triumphal(gunilla) Triumphal(gunilla) and Triumphal(gunilla) -> Imaginable(gunilla) -> therefore Imaginable(gunilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Richard is antimonial. Richard is quondam. Mikako is stripy. Mikako is quondam. Mikako is groundless. Kippie is groundless. Winni is quaternate. If something is wimpy and quondam then it is quaternate. All antimonial things are wimpy. If Richard is quaternate then Richard is swept. Mikako is not wimpy.", "logic": "\nAntimonial(richard)\nQuondam(richard)\nStripy(mikako)\nQuondam(mikako)\nGroundless(mikako)\nGroundless(kippie)\nQuaternate(winni)\nforall x (Wimpy(x) and Quondam(x) -> Quaternate(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nQuaternate(richard) -> Swept(richard)\n\nnot Wimpy(mikako)\n\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Wimpy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Adi is homey. Adi is vulgar. Roch is colourless. Roch is vulgar. Roch is scarce. Sofie is scarce. Katerina is danish. If something is unwavering and vulgar then it is danish. All homey things are unwavering. If Adi is danish then Adi is calendered. Roch is danish.", "logic": "\nHomey(adi)\nVulgar(adi)\nColourless(roch)\nVulgar(roch)\nScarce(roch)\nScarce(sofie)\nDanish(katerina)\nforall x (Unwavering(x) and Vulgar(x) -> Danish(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) -> Unwavering(x))\nDanish(adi) -> Calendered(adi)\n\nDanish(roch)\n\nforall x (Unwavering(x) and Vulgar(x) -> Danish(x)) <- forall x (Homey(x) -> Unwavering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Carmina is brambly. Carmina is avestan. Hillary is innumerate. Hillary is avestan. Hillary is maximum. Auroora is maximum. Valerie is identified. If something is inky and avestan then it is identified. All brambly things are inky. If Carmina is identified then Carmina is outrigged. Auroora is not identified.", "logic": "\nBrambly(carmina)\nAvestan(carmina)\nInnumerate(hillary)\nAvestan(hillary)\nMaximum(hillary)\nMaximum(auroora)\nIdentified(valerie)\nforall x (Inky(x) and Avestan(x) -> Identified(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) -> Inky(x))\nIdentified(carmina) -> Outrigged(carmina)\n\nnot Identified(auroora)\n\nforall x (Inky(x) and Avestan(x) -> Identified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Madelena is derogative. Madelena is shipshape. Keelia is welsh. Keelia is shipshape. Keelia is parametric. Bernadene is parametric. Woochang is rising. If something is spinose and shipshape then it is rising. All derogative things are spinose. If Madelena is rising then Madelena is monied. Bernadene is spinose.", "logic": "\nDerogative(madelena)\nShipshape(madelena)\nWelsh(keelia)\nShipshape(keelia)\nParametric(keelia)\nParametric(bernadene)\nRising(woochang)\nforall x (Spinose(x) and Shipshape(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Derogative(x) -> Spinose(x))\nRising(madelena) -> Monied(madelena)\n\nSpinose(bernadene)\n\nforall x (Derogative(x) -> Spinose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Shayne is chimerical. Shayne is heartening. Ozzie is smallish. Ozzie is heartening. Ozzie is divers. Taffy is divers. Minerva is venetian. If something is unfrosted and heartening then it is venetian. All chimerical things are unfrosted. If Shayne is venetian then Shayne is dwarfish. Minerva is not heartening.", "logic": "\nChimerical(shayne)\nHeartening(shayne)\nSmallish(ozzie)\nHeartening(ozzie)\nDivers(ozzie)\nDivers(taffy)\nVenetian(minerva)\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and Heartening(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Chimerical(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nVenetian(shayne) -> Dwarfish(shayne)\n\nnot Heartening(minerva)\n\nnot Heartening(minerva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Celle is acarpous. Celle is perpetual. Arlee is isochronal. Arlee is perpetual. Arlee is splashy. Rocky is splashy. Izak is repayable. If something is coetaneous and perpetual then it is repayable. All acarpous things are coetaneous. If Celle is repayable then Celle is connatural. Arlee is connatural.", "logic": "\nAcarpous(celle)\nPerpetual(celle)\nIsochronal(arlee)\nPerpetual(arlee)\nSplashy(arlee)\nSplashy(rocky)\nRepayable(izak)\nforall x (Coetaneous(x) and Perpetual(x) -> Repayable(x))\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> Coetaneous(x))\nRepayable(celle) -> Connatural(celle)\n\nConnatural(arlee)\n\nConnatural(arlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Phoebe is squeamish. Phoebe is landed. Christian is mottled. Christian is landed. Christian is thoriated. Mathew is thoriated. Rozalin is portentous. If something is exsanguine and landed then it is portentous. All squeamish things are exsanguine. If Phoebe is portentous then Phoebe is epidural. Phoebe is not mottled.", "logic": "\nSqueamish(phoebe)\nLanded(phoebe)\nMottled(christian)\nLanded(christian)\nThoriated(christian)\nThoriated(mathew)\nPortentous(rozalin)\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Landed(x) -> Portentous(x))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) -> Exsanguine(x))\nPortentous(phoebe) -> Epidural(phoebe)\n\nnot Mottled(phoebe)\n\nnot Mottled(phoebe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Aleta is etiolate. Aleta is aplitic. Weston is idolized. Weston is aplitic. Weston is smokeless. Lynnelle is smokeless. Appolonia is increasing. If something is twisted and aplitic then it is increasing. All etiolate things are twisted. If Aleta is increasing then Aleta is fucking. Appolonia is smokeless.", "logic": "\nEtiolate(aleta)\nAplitic(aleta)\nIdolized(weston)\nAplitic(weston)\nSmokeless(weston)\nSmokeless(lynnelle)\nIncreasing(appolonia)\nforall x (Twisted(x) and Aplitic(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Etiolate(x) -> Twisted(x))\nIncreasing(aleta) -> Fucking(aleta)\n\nSmokeless(appolonia)\n\nSmokeless(appolonia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Pennie is cataleptic. Pietra is cataleptic. Lindsey is castled. Cinnamon is siouan. All castled, undreamed things are cataleptic. All magnified things are grilled. All undreamed things are grilled. All siouan things are magnified. Smart, siouan things are magnified. Green, grilled things are castled. If Lindsey is magnified and Lindsey is undreamed then Lindsey is grilled. If something is undreamed and castled then it is siouan. Cinnamon is siouan.", "logic": "\nCataleptic(pennie)\nCataleptic(pietra)\nCastled(lindsey)\nSiouan(cinnamon)\nforall x (Castled(x) and Undreamed(x) -> Cataleptic(x))\nforall x (Magnified(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Magnified(x))\nforall x (Castled(x) and Siouan(x) -> Magnified(x))\nforall x (Magnified(x) and Grilled(x) -> Castled(x))\nMagnified(lindsey) and Undreamed(lindsey) -> Grilled(lindsey)\nforall x (Undreamed(x) and Castled(x) -> Siouan(x))\n\nSiouan(cinnamon)\n\ntherefore Siouan(cinnamon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Verla is costate. Thatcher is costate. Celestina is fixed. Ruthann is slithering. All fixed, unheeding things are costate. All transient things are reflex. All unheeding things are reflex. All slithering things are transient. Smart, slithering things are transient. Green, reflex things are fixed. If Celestina is transient and Celestina is unheeding then Celestina is reflex. If something is unheeding and fixed then it is slithering. Verla is not costate.", "logic": "\nCostate(verla)\nCostate(thatcher)\nFixed(celestina)\nSlithering(ruthann)\nforall x (Fixed(x) and Unheeding(x) -> Costate(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) -> Reflex(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) -> Reflex(x))\nforall x (Slithering(x) -> Transient(x))\nforall x (Fixed(x) and Slithering(x) -> Transient(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) and Reflex(x) -> Fixed(x))\nTransient(celestina) and Unheeding(celestina) -> Reflex(celestina)\nforall x (Unheeding(x) and Fixed(x) -> Slithering(x))\n\nnot Costate(verla)\n\ntherefore Costate(verla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Glen is affine. Adlai is affine. Chantalle is remorseful. Darin is theistical. All remorseful, blonde things are affine. All neurotoxic things are marbleised. All blonde things are marbleised. All theistical things are neurotoxic. Smart, theistical things are neurotoxic. Green, marbleised things are remorseful. If Chantalle is neurotoxic and Chantalle is blonde then Chantalle is marbleised. If something is blonde and remorseful then it is theistical. Darin is neurotoxic.", "logic": "\nAffine(glen)\nAffine(adlai)\nRemorseful(chantalle)\nTheistical(darin)\nforall x (Remorseful(x) and Blonde(x) -> Affine(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> Marbleised(x))\nforall x (Blonde(x) -> Marbleised(x))\nforall x (Theistical(x) -> Neurotoxic(x))\nforall x (Remorseful(x) and Theistical(x) -> Neurotoxic(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) and Marbleised(x) -> Remorseful(x))\nNeurotoxic(chantalle) and Blonde(chantalle) -> Marbleised(chantalle)\nforall x (Blonde(x) and Remorseful(x) -> Theistical(x))\n\nNeurotoxic(darin)\n\nTheistical(darin) and forall x (Theistical(x) -> Neurotoxic(x)) -> therefore Neurotoxic(darin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Veronica is worthy. Delcina is worthy. Tailor is drudging. Liane is sublunary. All drudging, dirty things are worthy. All immortal things are twentieth. All dirty things are twentieth. All sublunary things are immortal. Smart, sublunary things are immortal. Green, twentieth things are drudging. If Tailor is immortal and Tailor is dirty then Tailor is twentieth. If something is dirty and drudging then it is sublunary. Liane is not immortal.", "logic": "\nWorthy(veronica)\nWorthy(delcina)\nDrudging(tailor)\nSublunary(liane)\nforall x (Drudging(x) and Dirty(x) -> Worthy(x))\nforall x (Immortal(x) -> Twentieth(x))\nforall x (Dirty(x) -> Twentieth(x))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) -> Immortal(x))\nforall x (Drudging(x) and Sublunary(x) -> Immortal(x))\nforall x (Immortal(x) and Twentieth(x) -> Drudging(x))\nImmortal(tailor) and Dirty(tailor) -> Twentieth(tailor)\nforall x (Dirty(x) and Drudging(x) -> Sublunary(x))\n\nnot Immortal(liane)\n\nSublunary(liane) and forall x (Sublunary(x) -> Immortal(x)) -> therefore Immortal(liane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Barrie is homing. Marybeth is homing. Winston is wrothful. Cosette is level. All wrothful, zoological things are homing. All sideways things are errhine. All zoological things are errhine. All level things are sideways. Smart, level things are sideways. Green, errhine things are wrothful. If Winston is sideways and Winston is zoological then Winston is errhine. If something is zoological and wrothful then it is level. Cosette is errhine.", "logic": "\nHoming(barrie)\nHoming(marybeth)\nWrothful(winston)\nLevel(cosette)\nforall x (Wrothful(x) and Zoological(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Sideways(x) -> Errhine(x))\nforall x (Zoological(x) -> Errhine(x))\nforall x (Level(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Wrothful(x) and Level(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Sideways(x) and Errhine(x) -> Wrothful(x))\nSideways(winston) and Zoological(winston) -> Errhine(winston)\nforall x (Zoological(x) and Wrothful(x) -> Level(x))\n\nErrhine(cosette)\n\nLevel(cosette) and forall x (Level(x) -> Sideways(x)) -> therefore Sideways(cosette) Sideways(cosette) and forall x (Sideways(x) -> Errhine(x)) -> therefore Errhine(cosette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Herve is waste. Carine is waste. Veradis is estranged. Hetti is abstract. All estranged, molal things are waste. All homicidal things are buttony. All molal things are buttony. All abstract things are homicidal. Smart, abstract things are homicidal. Green, buttony things are estranged. If Veradis is homicidal and Veradis is molal then Veradis is buttony. If something is molal and estranged then it is abstract. Hetti is not buttony.", "logic": "\nWaste(herve)\nWaste(carine)\nEstranged(veradis)\nAbstract(hetti)\nforall x (Estranged(x) and Molal(x) -> Waste(x))\nforall x (Homicidal(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Molal(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Estranged(x) and Abstract(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Homicidal(x) and Buttony(x) -> Estranged(x))\nHomicidal(veradis) and Molal(veradis) -> Buttony(veradis)\nforall x (Molal(x) and Estranged(x) -> Abstract(x))\n\nnot Buttony(hetti)\n\nAbstract(hetti) and forall x (Abstract(x) -> Homicidal(x)) -> therefore Homicidal(hetti) Homicidal(hetti) and forall x (Homicidal(x) -> Buttony(x)) -> therefore Buttony(hetti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Angele is arboresque. Jeremie is arboresque. Phedra is satiny. Heather is eighth. All satiny, unscalable things are arboresque. All excess things are nosy. All unscalable things are nosy. All eighth things are excess. Smart, eighth things are excess. Green, nosy things are satiny. If Phedra is excess and Phedra is unscalable then Phedra is nosy. If something is unscalable and satiny then it is eighth. Heather is satiny.", "logic": "\nArboresque(angele)\nArboresque(jeremie)\nSatiny(phedra)\nEighth(heather)\nforall x (Satiny(x) and Unscalable(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Excess(x) -> Nosy(x))\nforall x (Unscalable(x) -> Nosy(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) -> Excess(x))\nforall x (Satiny(x) and Eighth(x) -> Excess(x))\nforall x (Excess(x) and Nosy(x) -> Satiny(x))\nExcess(phedra) and Unscalable(phedra) -> Nosy(phedra)\nforall x (Unscalable(x) and Satiny(x) -> Eighth(x))\n\nSatiny(heather)\n\nEighth(heather) and forall x (Eighth(x) -> Excess(x)) -> therefore Excess(heather) Eighth(heather) and forall x (Eighth(x) -> Excess(x)) -> therefore Excess(heather) Excess(heather) and forall x (Excess(x) -> Nosy(x)) -> therefore Nosy(heather) Excess(heather) and Nosy(heather) and forall x (Excess(x) and Nosy(x) -> Satiny(x)) -> therefore Satiny(heather)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Corny is adorable. Charyl is adorable. Glenine is edentate. Bennet is licenced. All edentate, delayed things are adorable. All dopey things are spumy. All delayed things are spumy. All licenced things are dopey. Smart, licenced things are dopey. Green, spumy things are edentate. If Glenine is dopey and Glenine is delayed then Glenine is spumy. If something is delayed and edentate then it is licenced. Bennet is not edentate.", "logic": "\nAdorable(corny)\nAdorable(charyl)\nEdentate(glenine)\nLicenced(bennet)\nforall x (Edentate(x) and Delayed(x) -> Adorable(x))\nforall x (Dopey(x) -> Spumy(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) -> Spumy(x))\nforall x (Licenced(x) -> Dopey(x))\nforall x (Edentate(x) and Licenced(x) -> Dopey(x))\nforall x (Dopey(x) and Spumy(x) -> Edentate(x))\nDopey(glenine) and Delayed(glenine) -> Spumy(glenine)\nforall x (Delayed(x) and Edentate(x) -> Licenced(x))\n\nnot Edentate(bennet)\n\nLicenced(bennet) and forall x (Licenced(x) -> Dopey(x)) -> therefore Dopey(bennet) Licenced(bennet) and forall x (Licenced(x) -> Dopey(x)) -> therefore Dopey(bennet) Dopey(bennet) and forall x (Dopey(x) -> Spumy(x)) -> therefore Spumy(bennet) Dopey(bennet) and Spumy(bennet) and forall x (Dopey(x) and Spumy(x) -> Edentate(x)) -> therefore Edentate(bennet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Krissy is polydactyl. Cristabel is polydactyl. Charlene is finnish. Ulrika is literal. All finnish, raising things are polydactyl. All adroit things are tref. All raising things are tref. All literal things are adroit. Smart, literal things are adroit. Green, tref things are finnish. If Charlene is adroit and Charlene is raising then Charlene is tref. If something is raising and finnish then it is literal. Charlene is not polydactyl.", "logic": "\nPolydactyl(krissy)\nPolydactyl(cristabel)\nFinnish(charlene)\nLiteral(ulrika)\nforall x (Finnish(x) and Raising(x) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Adroit(x) -> Tref(x))\nforall x (Raising(x) -> Tref(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) -> Adroit(x))\nforall x (Finnish(x) and Literal(x) -> Adroit(x))\nforall x (Adroit(x) and Tref(x) -> Finnish(x))\nAdroit(charlene) and Raising(charlene) -> Tref(charlene)\nforall x (Raising(x) and Finnish(x) -> Literal(x))\n\nnot Polydactyl(charlene)\n\nforall x (Finnish(x) and Raising(x) -> Polydactyl(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Tallie is stirring. Lynn is stirring. Sibel is bullying. Ralph is blustery. All bullying, barbadian things are stirring. All huxleian things are unclothed. All barbadian things are unclothed. All blustery things are huxleian. Smart, blustery things are huxleian. Green, unclothed things are bullying. If Sibel is huxleian and Sibel is barbadian then Sibel is unclothed. If something is barbadian and bullying then it is blustery. Sibel is unclothed.", "logic": "\nStirring(tallie)\nStirring(lynn)\nBullying(sibel)\nBlustery(ralph)\nforall x (Bullying(x) and Barbadian(x) -> Stirring(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Unclothed(x))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) -> Unclothed(x))\nforall x (Blustery(x) -> Huxleian(x))\nforall x (Bullying(x) and Blustery(x) -> Huxleian(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) and Unclothed(x) -> Bullying(x))\nHuxleian(sibel) and Barbadian(sibel) -> Unclothed(sibel)\nforall x (Barbadian(x) and Bullying(x) -> Blustery(x))\n\nUnclothed(sibel)\n\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Unclothed(x)) <- forall x (Blustery(x) -> Huxleian(x)) <- forall x (Barbadian(x) and Bullying(x) -> Blustery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Hart is satiate. Denys is satiate. Kimbra is cambial. Holley is arenaceous. All cambial, premarital things are satiate. All gnarled things are spick. All premarital things are spick. All arenaceous things are gnarled. Smart, arenaceous things are gnarled. Green, spick things are cambial. If Kimbra is gnarled and Kimbra is premarital then Kimbra is spick. If something is premarital and cambial then it is arenaceous. Denys is not cambial.", "logic": "\nSatiate(hart)\nSatiate(denys)\nCambial(kimbra)\nArenaceous(holley)\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Premarital(x) -> Satiate(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) -> Spick(x))\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> Spick(x))\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) -> Gnarled(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Arenaceous(x) -> Gnarled(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) and Spick(x) -> Cambial(x))\nGnarled(kimbra) and Premarital(kimbra) -> Spick(kimbra)\nforall x (Premarital(x) and Cambial(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\n\nnot Cambial(denys)\n\nforall x (Gnarled(x) and Spick(x) -> Cambial(x)) <- forall x (Arenaceous(x) -> Gnarled(x)) <- forall x (Premarital(x) and Cambial(x) -> Arenaceous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Marchelle is utmost. Stefania is utmost. Park is sextuple. Saxon is choosy. All sextuple, triclinic things are utmost. All wild things are foreign. All triclinic things are foreign. All choosy things are wild. Smart, choosy things are wild. Green, foreign things are sextuple. If Park is wild and Park is triclinic then Park is foreign. If something is triclinic and sextuple then it is choosy. Marchelle is sextuple.", "logic": "\nUtmost(marchelle)\nUtmost(stefania)\nSextuple(park)\nChoosy(saxon)\nforall x (Sextuple(x) and Triclinic(x) -> Utmost(x))\nforall x (Wild(x) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Triclinic(x) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Choosy(x) -> Wild(x))\nforall x (Sextuple(x) and Choosy(x) -> Wild(x))\nforall x (Wild(x) and Foreign(x) -> Sextuple(x))\nWild(park) and Triclinic(park) -> Foreign(park)\nforall x (Triclinic(x) and Sextuple(x) -> Choosy(x))\n\nSextuple(marchelle)\n\nforall x (Wild(x) and Foreign(x) -> Sextuple(x)) <- forall x (Choosy(x) -> Wild(x)) <- forall x (Triclinic(x) and Sextuple(x) -> Choosy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Dorian is boric. Smitty is boric. Fanya is gaseous. Vale is visualised. All gaseous, tined things are boric. All bahai things are clunky. All tined things are clunky. All visualised things are bahai. Smart, visualised things are bahai. Green, clunky things are gaseous. If Fanya is bahai and Fanya is tined then Fanya is clunky. If something is tined and gaseous then it is visualised. Vale is not young.", "logic": "\nBoric(dorian)\nBoric(smitty)\nGaseous(fanya)\nVisualised(vale)\nforall x (Gaseous(x) and Tined(x) -> Boric(x))\nforall x (Bahai(x) -> Clunky(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Clunky(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> Bahai(x))\nforall x (Gaseous(x) and Visualised(x) -> Bahai(x))\nforall x (Bahai(x) and Clunky(x) -> Gaseous(x))\nBahai(fanya) and Tined(fanya) -> Clunky(fanya)\nforall x (Tined(x) and Gaseous(x) -> Visualised(x))\n\nnot Young(vale)\n\nnot Young(vale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Noami is unfertile. Kalila is unfertile. Lilian is jointed. Anallise is aroid. All jointed, causative things are unfertile. All indecent things are metric. All causative things are metric. All aroid things are indecent. Smart, aroid things are indecent. Green, metric things are jointed. If Lilian is indecent and Lilian is causative then Lilian is metric. If something is causative and jointed then it is aroid. Kalila is young.", "logic": "\nUnfertile(noami)\nUnfertile(kalila)\nJointed(lilian)\nAroid(anallise)\nforall x (Jointed(x) and Causative(x) -> Unfertile(x))\nforall x (Indecent(x) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Aroid(x) -> Indecent(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) and Aroid(x) -> Indecent(x))\nforall x (Indecent(x) and Metric(x) -> Jointed(x))\nIndecent(lilian) and Causative(lilian) -> Metric(lilian)\nforall x (Causative(x) and Jointed(x) -> Aroid(x))\n\nYoung(kalila)\n\nYoung(kalila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Chas is tobagonian. Miguelita is tobagonian. Remington is unobvious. Linet is seismic. All unobvious, fourhanded things are tobagonian. All drastic things are polyvalent. All fourhanded things are polyvalent. All seismic things are drastic. Smart, seismic things are drastic. Green, polyvalent things are unobvious. If Remington is drastic and Remington is fourhanded then Remington is polyvalent. If something is fourhanded and unobvious then it is seismic. Remington is not young.", "logic": "\nTobagonian(chas)\nTobagonian(miguelita)\nUnobvious(remington)\nSeismic(linet)\nforall x (Unobvious(x) and Fourhanded(x) -> Tobagonian(x))\nforall x (Drastic(x) -> Polyvalent(x))\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) -> Polyvalent(x))\nforall x (Seismic(x) -> Drastic(x))\nforall x (Unobvious(x) and Seismic(x) -> Drastic(x))\nforall x (Drastic(x) and Polyvalent(x) -> Unobvious(x))\nDrastic(remington) and Fourhanded(remington) -> Polyvalent(remington)\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) and Unobvious(x) -> Seismic(x))\n\nnot Young(remington)\n\nnot Young(remington) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Terrianne is urogenital. Gabrila is urogenital. Belicia is tenuous. Leonard is unfueled. All tenuous, dynamic things are urogenital. All dissuasive things are virulent. All dynamic things are virulent. All unfueled things are dissuasive. Smart, unfueled things are dissuasive. Green, virulent things are tenuous. If Belicia is dissuasive and Belicia is dynamic then Belicia is virulent. If something is dynamic and tenuous then it is unfueled. Belicia is dynamic.", "logic": "\nUrogenital(terrianne)\nUrogenital(gabrila)\nTenuous(belicia)\nUnfueled(leonard)\nforall x (Tenuous(x) and Dynamic(x) -> Urogenital(x))\nforall x (Dissuasive(x) -> Virulent(x))\nforall x (Dynamic(x) -> Virulent(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Dissuasive(x))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) and Unfueled(x) -> Dissuasive(x))\nforall x (Dissuasive(x) and Virulent(x) -> Tenuous(x))\nDissuasive(belicia) and Dynamic(belicia) -> Virulent(belicia)\nforall x (Dynamic(x) and Tenuous(x) -> Unfueled(x))\n\nDynamic(belicia)\n\nDynamic(belicia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Steffane is flowery. Steffane is doctorial. Steffane is gray. Nice, gray things are arborical. Red, farcical things are snobbish. Round, snobbish things are infernal. If something is arborical then it is snobbish. All gray, snobbish things are farcical. If Steffane is farcical then Steffane is doctorial. All arborical, doctorial things are farcical. If Steffane is gray then Steffane is arborical. Steffane is doctorial.", "logic": "\nFlowery(steffane)\nDoctorial(steffane)\nGray(steffane)\nforall x (Snobbish(x) and Gray(x) -> Arborical(x))\nforall x (Doctorial(x) and Farcical(x) -> Snobbish(x))\nforall x (Farcical(x) and Snobbish(x) -> Infernal(x))\nforall x (Arborical(x) -> Snobbish(x))\nforall x (Gray(x) and Snobbish(x) -> Farcical(x))\nFarcical(steffane) -> Doctorial(steffane)\nforall x (Arborical(x) and Doctorial(x) -> Farcical(x))\nGray(steffane) -> Arborical(steffane)\n\nDoctorial(steffane)\n\ntherefore Doctorial(steffane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Brigit is collected. Brigit is viatical. Brigit is xeric. Nice, xeric things are unpaired. Red, ninefold things are upset. Round, upset things are cxlv. If something is unpaired then it is upset. All xeric, upset things are ninefold. If Brigit is ninefold then Brigit is viatical. All unpaired, viatical things are ninefold. If Brigit is xeric then Brigit is unpaired. Brigit is not collected.", "logic": "\nCollected(brigit)\nViatical(brigit)\nXeric(brigit)\nforall x (Upset(x) and Xeric(x) -> Unpaired(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Upset(x))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Upset(x) -> Cxlv(x))\nforall x (Unpaired(x) -> Upset(x))\nforall x (Xeric(x) and Upset(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nNinefold(brigit) -> Viatical(brigit)\nforall x (Unpaired(x) and Viatical(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nXeric(brigit) -> Unpaired(brigit)\n\nnot Collected(brigit)\n\ntherefore Collected(brigit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Jeffry is required. Jeffry is straggly. Jeffry is nominated. Nice, nominated things are matey. Red, corrective things are removed. Round, removed things are unfree. If something is matey then it is removed. All nominated, removed things are corrective. If Jeffry is corrective then Jeffry is straggly. All matey, straggly things are corrective. If Jeffry is nominated then Jeffry is matey. Jeffry is matey.", "logic": "\nRequired(jeffry)\nStraggly(jeffry)\nNominated(jeffry)\nforall x (Removed(x) and Nominated(x) -> Matey(x))\nforall x (Straggly(x) and Corrective(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Corrective(x) and Removed(x) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Matey(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and Removed(x) -> Corrective(x))\nCorrective(jeffry) -> Straggly(jeffry)\nforall x (Matey(x) and Straggly(x) -> Corrective(x))\nNominated(jeffry) -> Matey(jeffry)\n\nMatey(jeffry)\n\nNominated(jeffry) and Nominated(jeffry) -> Matey(jeffry) -> therefore Matey(jeffry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Cary is animate. Cary is unbound. Cary is squarish. Nice, squarish things are operative. Red, perforate things are monogynic. Round, monogynic things are fake. If something is operative then it is monogynic. All squarish, monogynic things are perforate. If Cary is perforate then Cary is unbound. All operative, unbound things are perforate. If Cary is squarish then Cary is operative. Cary is not operative.", "logic": "\nAnimate(cary)\nUnbound(cary)\nSquarish(cary)\nforall x (Monogynic(x) and Squarish(x) -> Operative(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) and Perforate(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nforall x (Perforate(x) and Monogynic(x) -> Fake(x))\nforall x (Operative(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Monogynic(x) -> Perforate(x))\nPerforate(cary) -> Unbound(cary)\nforall x (Operative(x) and Unbound(x) -> Perforate(x))\nSquarish(cary) -> Operative(cary)\n\nnot Operative(cary)\n\nSquarish(cary) and Squarish(cary) -> Operative(cary) -> therefore Operative(cary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Erminie is dread. Erminie is immotile. Erminie is profuse. Nice, profuse things are desolate. Red, unimposing things are injurious. Round, injurious things are mouthless. If something is desolate then it is injurious. All profuse, injurious things are unimposing. If Erminie is unimposing then Erminie is immotile. All desolate, immotile things are unimposing. If Erminie is profuse then Erminie is desolate. Erminie is unimposing.", "logic": "\nDread(erminie)\nImmotile(erminie)\nProfuse(erminie)\nforall x (Injurious(x) and Profuse(x) -> Desolate(x))\nforall x (Immotile(x) and Unimposing(x) -> Injurious(x))\nforall x (Unimposing(x) and Injurious(x) -> Mouthless(x))\nforall x (Desolate(x) -> Injurious(x))\nforall x (Profuse(x) and Injurious(x) -> Unimposing(x))\nUnimposing(erminie) -> Immotile(erminie)\nforall x (Desolate(x) and Immotile(x) -> Unimposing(x))\nProfuse(erminie) -> Desolate(erminie)\n\nUnimposing(erminie)\n\nProfuse(erminie) and Profuse(erminie) -> Desolate(erminie) -> therefore Desolate(erminie) Desolate(erminie) and Immotile(erminie) and forall x (Desolate(x) and Immotile(x) -> Unimposing(x)) -> therefore Unimposing(erminie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Ida is leafy. Ida is harnessed. Ida is impeded. Nice, impeded things are senescent. Red, nonspatial things are kittenish. Round, kittenish things are futurist. If something is senescent then it is kittenish. All impeded, kittenish things are nonspatial. If Ida is nonspatial then Ida is harnessed. All senescent, harnessed things are nonspatial. If Ida is impeded then Ida is senescent. Ida is not nonspatial.", "logic": "\nLeafy(ida)\nHarnessed(ida)\nImpeded(ida)\nforall x (Kittenish(x) and Impeded(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Harnessed(x) and Nonspatial(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) and Kittenish(x) -> Futurist(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Impeded(x) and Kittenish(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nNonspatial(ida) -> Harnessed(ida)\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Harnessed(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nImpeded(ida) -> Senescent(ida)\n\nnot Nonspatial(ida)\n\nImpeded(ida) and Impeded(ida) -> Senescent(ida) -> therefore Senescent(ida) Senescent(ida) and Harnessed(ida) and forall x (Senescent(x) and Harnessed(x) -> Nonspatial(x)) -> therefore Nonspatial(ida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Lucien is lifesize. Lucien is taxing. Lucien is auctorial. Nice, auctorial things are vendible. Red, offended things are palpitant. Round, palpitant things are especial. If something is vendible then it is palpitant. All auctorial, palpitant things are offended. If Lucien is offended then Lucien is taxing. All vendible, taxing things are offended. If Lucien is auctorial then Lucien is vendible. Lucien is especial.", "logic": "\nLifesize(lucien)\nTaxing(lucien)\nAuctorial(lucien)\nforall x (Palpitant(x) and Auctorial(x) -> Vendible(x))\nforall x (Taxing(x) and Offended(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Offended(x) and Palpitant(x) -> Especial(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Auctorial(x) and Palpitant(x) -> Offended(x))\nOffended(lucien) -> Taxing(lucien)\nforall x (Vendible(x) and Taxing(x) -> Offended(x))\nAuctorial(lucien) -> Vendible(lucien)\n\nEspecial(lucien)\n\nAuctorial(lucien) and Auctorial(lucien) -> Vendible(lucien) -> therefore Vendible(lucien) Vendible(lucien) and Taxing(lucien) and forall x (Vendible(x) and Taxing(x) -> Offended(x)) -> therefore Offended(lucien) Auctorial(lucien) and Auctorial(lucien) -> Vendible(lucien) -> therefore Vendible(lucien) Vendible(lucien) and forall x (Vendible(x) -> Palpitant(x)) -> therefore Palpitant(lucien) Offended(lucien) and Palpitant(lucien) and forall x (Offended(x) and Palpitant(x) -> Especial(x)) -> therefore Especial(lucien)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Danyette is loose. Danyette is excitant. Danyette is sedative. Nice, sedative things are treed. Red, operatic things are horrendous. Round, horrendous things are unbranched. If something is treed then it is horrendous. All sedative, horrendous things are operatic. If Danyette is operatic then Danyette is excitant. All treed, excitant things are operatic. If Danyette is sedative then Danyette is treed. Danyette is not unbranched.", "logic": "\nLoose(danyette)\nExcitant(danyette)\nSedative(danyette)\nforall x (Horrendous(x) and Sedative(x) -> Treed(x))\nforall x (Excitant(x) and Operatic(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) and Horrendous(x) -> Unbranched(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) and Horrendous(x) -> Operatic(x))\nOperatic(danyette) -> Excitant(danyette)\nforall x (Treed(x) and Excitant(x) -> Operatic(x))\nSedative(danyette) -> Treed(danyette)\n\nnot Unbranched(danyette)\n\nSedative(danyette) and Sedative(danyette) -> Treed(danyette) -> therefore Treed(danyette) Treed(danyette) and Excitant(danyette) and forall x (Treed(x) and Excitant(x) -> Operatic(x)) -> therefore Operatic(danyette) Sedative(danyette) and Sedative(danyette) -> Treed(danyette) -> therefore Treed(danyette) Treed(danyette) and forall x (Treed(x) -> Horrendous(x)) -> therefore Horrendous(danyette) Operatic(danyette) and Horrendous(danyette) and forall x (Operatic(x) and Horrendous(x) -> Unbranched(x)) -> therefore Unbranched(danyette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "The terrence buzz the bambie. The terrence cripple the hermine. The bambie buzz the terrence. The bambie buzz the hermine. The bambie buzz the queada. The hermine buzz the terrence. The hermine cripple the queada. The queada is obliterate. The queada is eery. The queada cripple the hermine. If the bambie reabsorb the hermine then the bambie is seething. If someone is unwedded then they need the bambie. If someone buzz the hermine then they eat the hermine. If someone is unwedded then they need the bambie. If someone reabsorb the terrence then they are unwedded. If the bambie buzz the terrence then the bambie reabsorb the queada. If someone cripple the queada and they chase the hermine then the hermine cripple the queada. If someone is seething then they need the queada. The queada is eery.", "logic": "\nBuzz(terrence, bambie)\nCripple(terrence, hermine)\nBuzz(bambie, terrence)\nBuzz(bambie, hermine)\nBuzz(bambie, queada)\nBuzz(hermine, terrence)\nCripple(hermine, queada)\nObliterate(queada)\nEery(queada)\nCripple(queada, hermine)\nReabsorb(bambie, hermine) -> Seething(bambie)\nforall x (Unwedded(x) -> Cripple(x, bambie))\nforall x (Buzz(x, hermine) -> Reabsorb(x, hermine))\nforall x (Unwedded(x) -> Cripple(x, bambie))\nforall x (Reabsorb(x, terrence) -> Unwedded(x))\nBuzz(bambie, terrence) -> Reabsorb(bambie, queada)\nforall x (Cripple(x, queada) and Buzz(x, hermine) -> Cripple(hermine, queada))\nforall x (Seething(x) -> Cripple(x, queada))\n\nEery(queada)\n\ntherefore Eery(queada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The darryl trail the armstrong. The darryl bloom the cresa. The armstrong trail the darryl. The armstrong trail the cresa. The armstrong trail the dione. The cresa trail the darryl. The cresa bloom the dione. The dione is grecian. The dione is tailless. The dione bloom the cresa. If the armstrong vote the cresa then the armstrong is henpecked. If someone is squiggly then they need the armstrong. If someone trail the cresa then they eat the cresa. If someone is squiggly then they need the armstrong. If someone vote the darryl then they are squiggly. If the armstrong trail the darryl then the armstrong vote the dione. If someone bloom the dione and they chase the cresa then the cresa bloom the dione. If someone is henpecked then they need the dione. The dione is not tailless.", "logic": "\nTrail(darryl, armstrong)\nBloom(darryl, cresa)\nTrail(armstrong, darryl)\nTrail(armstrong, cresa)\nTrail(armstrong, dione)\nTrail(cresa, darryl)\nBloom(cresa, dione)\nGrecian(dione)\nTailless(dione)\nBloom(dione, cresa)\nVote(armstrong, cresa) -> Henpecked(armstrong)\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Bloom(x, armstrong))\nforall x (Trail(x, cresa) -> Vote(x, cresa))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Bloom(x, armstrong))\nforall x (Vote(x, darryl) -> Squiggly(x))\nTrail(armstrong, darryl) -> Vote(armstrong, dione)\nforall x (Bloom(x, dione) and Trail(x, cresa) -> Bloom(cresa, dione))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Bloom(x, dione))\n\nnot Tailless(dione)\n\ntherefore Tailless(dione)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The lindie sodomize the margarete. The lindie billow the shannon. The margarete sodomize the lindie. The margarete sodomize the shannon. The margarete sodomize the roy. The shannon sodomize the lindie. The shannon billow the roy. The roy is fibrous. The roy is aphotic. The roy billow the shannon. If the margarete cuff the shannon then the margarete is farseeing. If someone is negligent then they need the margarete. If someone sodomize the shannon then they eat the shannon. If someone is negligent then they need the margarete. If someone cuff the lindie then they are negligent. If the margarete sodomize the lindie then the margarete cuff the roy. If someone billow the roy and they chase the shannon then the shannon billow the roy. If someone is farseeing then they need the roy. The margarete cuff the roy.", "logic": "\nSodomize(lindie, margarete)\nBillow(lindie, shannon)\nSodomize(margarete, lindie)\nSodomize(margarete, shannon)\nSodomize(margarete, roy)\nSodomize(shannon, lindie)\nBillow(shannon, roy)\nFibrous(roy)\nAphotic(roy)\nBillow(roy, shannon)\nCuff(margarete, shannon) -> Farseeing(margarete)\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Billow(x, margarete))\nforall x (Sodomize(x, shannon) -> Cuff(x, shannon))\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Billow(x, margarete))\nforall x (Cuff(x, lindie) -> Negligent(x))\nSodomize(margarete, lindie) -> Cuff(margarete, roy)\nforall x (Billow(x, roy) and Sodomize(x, shannon) -> Billow(shannon, roy))\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Billow(x, roy))\n\nCuff(margarete, roy)\n\nSodomize(margarete, lindie) and Sodomize(margarete, lindie) -> Cuff(margarete, roy) -> therefore Cuff(margarete, roy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The boyce fiddle the carmelle. The boyce stud the hamlen. The carmelle fiddle the boyce. The carmelle fiddle the hamlen. The carmelle fiddle the misti. The hamlen fiddle the boyce. The hamlen stud the misti. The misti is fluent. The misti is glorified. The misti stud the hamlen. If the carmelle assimilate the hamlen then the carmelle is angolan. If someone is hebraic then they need the carmelle. If someone fiddle the hamlen then they eat the hamlen. If someone is hebraic then they need the carmelle. If someone assimilate the boyce then they are hebraic. If the carmelle fiddle the boyce then the carmelle assimilate the misti. If someone stud the misti and they chase the hamlen then the hamlen stud the misti. If someone is angolan then they need the misti. The carmelle does not eat the hamlen.", "logic": "\nFiddle(boyce, carmelle)\nStud(boyce, hamlen)\nFiddle(carmelle, boyce)\nFiddle(carmelle, hamlen)\nFiddle(carmelle, misti)\nFiddle(hamlen, boyce)\nStud(hamlen, misti)\nFluent(misti)\nGlorified(misti)\nStud(misti, hamlen)\nAssimilate(carmelle, hamlen) -> Angolan(carmelle)\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Stud(x, carmelle))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, hamlen) -> Assimilate(x, hamlen))\nforall x (Hebraic(x) -> Stud(x, carmelle))\nforall x (Assimilate(x, boyce) -> Hebraic(x))\nFiddle(carmelle, boyce) -> Assimilate(carmelle, misti)\nforall x (Stud(x, misti) and Fiddle(x, hamlen) -> Stud(hamlen, misti))\nforall x (Angolan(x) -> Stud(x, misti))\n\nnot Assimilate(carmelle, hamlen)\n\nFiddle(carmelle, hamlen) and forall x (Fiddle(x, hamlen) -> Assimilate(x, hamlen)) -> therefore Assimilate(carmelle, hamlen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The sigmund waltz the nonie. The sigmund contrast the rodolfo. The nonie waltz the sigmund. The nonie waltz the rodolfo. The nonie waltz the rees. The rodolfo waltz the sigmund. The rodolfo contrast the rees. The rees is satanic. The rees is wedded. The rees contrast the rodolfo. If the nonie bread the rodolfo then the nonie is empyreal. If someone is annual then they need the nonie. If someone waltz the rodolfo then they eat the rodolfo. If someone is annual then they need the nonie. If someone bread the sigmund then they are annual. If the nonie waltz the sigmund then the nonie bread the rees. If someone contrast the rees and they chase the rodolfo then the rodolfo contrast the rees. If someone is empyreal then they need the rees. The nonie is empyreal.", "logic": "\nWaltz(sigmund, nonie)\nContrast(sigmund, rodolfo)\nWaltz(nonie, sigmund)\nWaltz(nonie, rodolfo)\nWaltz(nonie, rees)\nWaltz(rodolfo, sigmund)\nContrast(rodolfo, rees)\nSatanic(rees)\nWedded(rees)\nContrast(rees, rodolfo)\nBread(nonie, rodolfo) -> Empyreal(nonie)\nforall x (Annual(x) -> Contrast(x, nonie))\nforall x (Waltz(x, rodolfo) -> Bread(x, rodolfo))\nforall x (Annual(x) -> Contrast(x, nonie))\nforall x (Bread(x, sigmund) -> Annual(x))\nWaltz(nonie, sigmund) -> Bread(nonie, rees)\nforall x (Contrast(x, rees) and Waltz(x, rodolfo) -> Contrast(rodolfo, rees))\nforall x (Empyreal(x) -> Contrast(x, rees))\n\nEmpyreal(nonie)\n\nWaltz(nonie, rodolfo) and forall x (Waltz(x, rodolfo) -> Bread(x, rodolfo)) -> therefore Bread(nonie, rodolfo) Bread(nonie, rodolfo) and Bread(nonie, rodolfo) -> Empyreal(nonie) -> therefore Empyreal(nonie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The kevin broom the raymond. The kevin splat the nicola. The raymond broom the kevin. The raymond broom the nicola. The raymond broom the antony. The nicola broom the kevin. The nicola splat the antony. The antony is georgian. The antony is tremendous. The antony splat the nicola. If the raymond reposit the nicola then the raymond is mesial. If someone is platelike then they need the raymond. If someone broom the nicola then they eat the nicola. If someone is platelike then they need the raymond. If someone reposit the kevin then they are platelike. If the raymond broom the kevin then the raymond reposit the antony. If someone splat the antony and they chase the nicola then the nicola splat the antony. If someone is mesial then they need the antony. The raymond is not mesial.", "logic": "\nBroom(kevin, raymond)\nSplat(kevin, nicola)\nBroom(raymond, kevin)\nBroom(raymond, nicola)\nBroom(raymond, antony)\nBroom(nicola, kevin)\nSplat(nicola, antony)\nGeorgian(antony)\nTremendous(antony)\nSplat(antony, nicola)\nReposit(raymond, nicola) -> Mesial(raymond)\nforall x (Platelike(x) -> Splat(x, raymond))\nforall x (Broom(x, nicola) -> Reposit(x, nicola))\nforall x (Platelike(x) -> Splat(x, raymond))\nforall x (Reposit(x, kevin) -> Platelike(x))\nBroom(raymond, kevin) -> Reposit(raymond, antony)\nforall x (Splat(x, antony) and Broom(x, nicola) -> Splat(nicola, antony))\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> Splat(x, antony))\n\nnot Mesial(raymond)\n\nBroom(raymond, nicola) and forall x (Broom(x, nicola) -> Reposit(x, nicola)) -> therefore Reposit(raymond, nicola) Reposit(raymond, nicola) and Reposit(raymond, nicola) -> Mesial(raymond) -> therefore Mesial(raymond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The gladis transport the cassi. The gladis platinize the florencia. The cassi transport the gladis. The cassi transport the florencia. The cassi transport the torrence. The florencia transport the gladis. The florencia platinize the torrence. The torrence is lusitanian. The torrence is aortal. The torrence platinize the florencia. If the cassi kick the florencia then the cassi is elusive. If someone is unselfish then they need the cassi. If someone transport the florencia then they eat the florencia. If someone is unselfish then they need the cassi. If someone kick the gladis then they are unselfish. If the cassi transport the gladis then the cassi kick the torrence. If someone platinize the torrence and they chase the florencia then the florencia platinize the torrence. If someone is elusive then they need the torrence. The cassi platinize the torrence.", "logic": "\nTransport(gladis, cassi)\nPlatinize(gladis, florencia)\nTransport(cassi, gladis)\nTransport(cassi, florencia)\nTransport(cassi, torrence)\nTransport(florencia, gladis)\nPlatinize(florencia, torrence)\nLusitanian(torrence)\nAortal(torrence)\nPlatinize(torrence, florencia)\nKick(cassi, florencia) -> Elusive(cassi)\nforall x (Unselfish(x) -> Platinize(x, cassi))\nforall x (Transport(x, florencia) -> Kick(x, florencia))\nforall x (Unselfish(x) -> Platinize(x, cassi))\nforall x (Kick(x, gladis) -> Unselfish(x))\nTransport(cassi, gladis) -> Kick(cassi, torrence)\nforall x (Platinize(x, torrence) and Transport(x, florencia) -> Platinize(florencia, torrence))\nforall x (Elusive(x) -> Platinize(x, torrence))\n\nPlatinize(cassi, torrence)\n\nTransport(cassi, florencia) and forall x (Transport(x, florencia) -> Kick(x, florencia)) -> therefore Kick(cassi, florencia) Kick(cassi, florencia) and Kick(cassi, florencia) -> Elusive(cassi) -> therefore Elusive(cassi) Elusive(cassi) and forall x (Elusive(x) -> Platinize(x, torrence)) -> therefore Platinize(cassi, torrence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The blisse prate the wye. The blisse telescope the idelle. The wye prate the blisse. The wye prate the idelle. The wye prate the carolynn. The idelle prate the blisse. The idelle telescope the carolynn. The carolynn is vendable. The carolynn is validatory. The carolynn telescope the idelle. If the wye digitalize the idelle then the wye is zoic. If someone is wellborn then they need the wye. If someone prate the idelle then they eat the idelle. If someone is wellborn then they need the wye. If someone digitalize the blisse then they are wellborn. If the wye prate the blisse then the wye digitalize the carolynn. If someone telescope the carolynn and they chase the idelle then the idelle telescope the carolynn. If someone is zoic then they need the carolynn. The wye does not need the carolynn.", "logic": "\nPrate(blisse, wye)\nTelescope(blisse, idelle)\nPrate(wye, blisse)\nPrate(wye, idelle)\nPrate(wye, carolynn)\nPrate(idelle, blisse)\nTelescope(idelle, carolynn)\nVendable(carolynn)\nValidatory(carolynn)\nTelescope(carolynn, idelle)\nDigitalize(wye, idelle) -> Zoic(wye)\nforall x (Wellborn(x) -> Telescope(x, wye))\nforall x (Prate(x, idelle) -> Digitalize(x, idelle))\nforall x (Wellborn(x) -> Telescope(x, wye))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, blisse) -> Wellborn(x))\nPrate(wye, blisse) -> Digitalize(wye, carolynn)\nforall x (Telescope(x, carolynn) and Prate(x, idelle) -> Telescope(idelle, carolynn))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Telescope(x, carolynn))\n\nnot Telescope(wye, carolynn)\n\nPrate(wye, idelle) and forall x (Prate(x, idelle) -> Digitalize(x, idelle)) -> therefore Digitalize(wye, idelle) Digitalize(wye, idelle) and Digitalize(wye, idelle) -> Zoic(wye) -> therefore Zoic(wye) Zoic(wye) and forall x (Zoic(x) -> Telescope(x, carolynn)) -> therefore Telescope(wye, carolynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The giacinta underlie the dani. The giacinta subvert the maren. The dani underlie the giacinta. The dani underlie the maren. The dani underlie the desmund. The maren underlie the giacinta. The maren subvert the desmund. The desmund is spayed. The desmund is synoecious. The desmund subvert the maren. If the dani tense the maren then the dani is adoptive. If someone is pacifistic then they need the dani. If someone underlie the maren then they eat the maren. If someone is pacifistic then they need the dani. If someone tense the giacinta then they are pacifistic. If the dani underlie the giacinta then the dani tense the desmund. If someone subvert the desmund and they chase the maren then the maren subvert the desmund. If someone is adoptive then they need the desmund. The maren does not eat the maren.", "logic": "\nUnderlie(giacinta, dani)\nSubvert(giacinta, maren)\nUnderlie(dani, giacinta)\nUnderlie(dani, maren)\nUnderlie(dani, desmund)\nUnderlie(maren, giacinta)\nSubvert(maren, desmund)\nSpayed(desmund)\nSynoecious(desmund)\nSubvert(desmund, maren)\nTense(dani, maren) -> Adoptive(dani)\nforall x (Pacifistic(x) -> Subvert(x, dani))\nforall x (Underlie(x, maren) -> Tense(x, maren))\nforall x (Pacifistic(x) -> Subvert(x, dani))\nforall x (Tense(x, giacinta) -> Pacifistic(x))\nUnderlie(dani, giacinta) -> Tense(dani, desmund)\nforall x (Subvert(x, desmund) and Underlie(x, maren) -> Subvert(maren, desmund))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Subvert(x, desmund))\n\nnot Tense(maren, maren)\n\nforall x (Underlie(x, maren) -> Tense(x, maren)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The ahmad mate the edyth. The ahmad evaluate the aggy. The edyth mate the ahmad. The edyth mate the aggy. The edyth mate the lyndsie. The aggy mate the ahmad. The aggy evaluate the lyndsie. The lyndsie is testaceous. The lyndsie is captive. The lyndsie evaluate the aggy. If the edyth pile the aggy then the edyth is sedentary. If someone is deadening then they need the edyth. If someone mate the aggy then they eat the aggy. If someone is deadening then they need the edyth. If someone pile the ahmad then they are deadening. If the edyth mate the ahmad then the edyth pile the lyndsie. If someone evaluate the lyndsie and they chase the aggy then the aggy evaluate the lyndsie. If someone is sedentary then they need the lyndsie. The aggy is deadening.", "logic": "\nMate(ahmad, edyth)\nEvaluate(ahmad, aggy)\nMate(edyth, ahmad)\nMate(edyth, aggy)\nMate(edyth, lyndsie)\nMate(aggy, ahmad)\nEvaluate(aggy, lyndsie)\nTestaceous(lyndsie)\nCaptive(lyndsie)\nEvaluate(lyndsie, aggy)\nPile(edyth, aggy) -> Sedentary(edyth)\nforall x (Deadening(x) -> Evaluate(x, edyth))\nforall x (Mate(x, aggy) -> Pile(x, aggy))\nforall x (Deadening(x) -> Evaluate(x, edyth))\nforall x (Pile(x, ahmad) -> Deadening(x))\nMate(edyth, ahmad) -> Pile(edyth, lyndsie)\nforall x (Evaluate(x, lyndsie) and Mate(x, aggy) -> Evaluate(aggy, lyndsie))\nforall x (Sedentary(x) -> Evaluate(x, lyndsie))\n\nDeadening(aggy)\n\nforall x (Pile(x, ahmad) -> Deadening(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The loleta oxygenate the kerstin. The loleta fuck the jedediah. The kerstin oxygenate the loleta. The kerstin oxygenate the jedediah. The kerstin oxygenate the trisha. The jedediah oxygenate the loleta. The jedediah fuck the trisha. The trisha is dreadful. The trisha is sagittate. The trisha fuck the jedediah. If the kerstin defile the jedediah then the kerstin is shouted. If someone is vacant then they need the kerstin. If someone oxygenate the jedediah then they eat the jedediah. If someone is vacant then they need the kerstin. If someone defile the loleta then they are vacant. If the kerstin oxygenate the loleta then the kerstin defile the trisha. If someone fuck the trisha and they chase the jedediah then the jedediah fuck the trisha. If someone is shouted then they need the trisha. The kerstin is not vacant.", "logic": "\nOxygenate(loleta, kerstin)\nFuck(loleta, jedediah)\nOxygenate(kerstin, loleta)\nOxygenate(kerstin, jedediah)\nOxygenate(kerstin, trisha)\nOxygenate(jedediah, loleta)\nFuck(jedediah, trisha)\nDreadful(trisha)\nSagittate(trisha)\nFuck(trisha, jedediah)\nDefile(kerstin, jedediah) -> Shouted(kerstin)\nforall x (Vacant(x) -> Fuck(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Oxygenate(x, jedediah) -> Defile(x, jedediah))\nforall x (Vacant(x) -> Fuck(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Defile(x, loleta) -> Vacant(x))\nOxygenate(kerstin, loleta) -> Defile(kerstin, trisha)\nforall x (Fuck(x, trisha) and Oxygenate(x, jedediah) -> Fuck(jedediah, trisha))\nforall x (Shouted(x) -> Fuck(x, trisha))\n\nnot Vacant(kerstin)\n\nforall x (Defile(x, loleta) -> Vacant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The pryce scent the rayshell. The pryce offer the harold. The rayshell scent the pryce. The rayshell scent the harold. The rayshell scent the lacee. The harold scent the pryce. The harold offer the lacee. The lacee is loutish. The lacee is atheistic. The lacee offer the harold. If the rayshell chance the harold then the rayshell is tapestried. If someone is metabolous then they need the rayshell. If someone scent the harold then they eat the harold. If someone is metabolous then they need the rayshell. If someone chance the pryce then they are metabolous. If the rayshell scent the pryce then the rayshell chance the lacee. If someone offer the lacee and they chase the harold then the harold offer the lacee. If someone is tapestried then they need the lacee. The pryce offer the rayshell.", "logic": "\nScent(pryce, rayshell)\nOffer(pryce, harold)\nScent(rayshell, pryce)\nScent(rayshell, harold)\nScent(rayshell, lacee)\nScent(harold, pryce)\nOffer(harold, lacee)\nLoutish(lacee)\nAtheistic(lacee)\nOffer(lacee, harold)\nChance(rayshell, harold) -> Tapestried(rayshell)\nforall x (Metabolous(x) -> Offer(x, rayshell))\nforall x (Scent(x, harold) -> Chance(x, harold))\nforall x (Metabolous(x) -> Offer(x, rayshell))\nforall x (Chance(x, pryce) -> Metabolous(x))\nScent(rayshell, pryce) -> Chance(rayshell, lacee)\nforall x (Offer(x, lacee) and Scent(x, harold) -> Offer(harold, lacee))\nforall x (Tapestried(x) -> Offer(x, lacee))\n\nOffer(pryce, rayshell)\n\nforall x (Metabolous(x) -> Offer(x, rayshell)) <- forall x (Chance(x, pryce) -> Metabolous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The terencio shift the flemming. The terencio scowl the zarla. The flemming shift the terencio. The flemming shift the zarla. The flemming shift the velma. The zarla shift the terencio. The zarla scowl the velma. The velma is fijian. The velma is shiftless. The velma scowl the zarla. If the flemming purge the zarla then the flemming is betrothed. If someone is unsolvable then they need the flemming. If someone shift the zarla then they eat the zarla. If someone is unsolvable then they need the flemming. If someone purge the terencio then they are unsolvable. If the flemming shift the terencio then the flemming purge the velma. If someone scowl the velma and they chase the zarla then the zarla scowl the velma. If someone is betrothed then they need the velma. The flemming does not need the zarla.", "logic": "\nShift(terencio, flemming)\nScowl(terencio, zarla)\nShift(flemming, terencio)\nShift(flemming, zarla)\nShift(flemming, velma)\nShift(zarla, terencio)\nScowl(zarla, velma)\nFijian(velma)\nShiftless(velma)\nScowl(velma, zarla)\nPurge(flemming, zarla) -> Betrothed(flemming)\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) -> Scowl(x, flemming))\nforall x (Shift(x, zarla) -> Purge(x, zarla))\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) -> Scowl(x, flemming))\nforall x (Purge(x, terencio) -> Unsolvable(x))\nShift(flemming, terencio) -> Purge(flemming, velma)\nforall x (Scowl(x, velma) and Shift(x, zarla) -> Scowl(zarla, velma))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Scowl(x, velma))\n\nnot Scowl(flemming, zarla)\n\nnot Scowl(flemming, zarla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The avie depolarize the heide. The avie race the trina. The heide depolarize the avie. The heide depolarize the trina. The heide depolarize the leontine. The trina depolarize the avie. The trina race the leontine. The leontine is antinomian. The leontine is funny. The leontine race the trina. If the heide tell the trina then the heide is bulbed. If someone is linked then they need the heide. If someone depolarize the trina then they eat the trina. If someone is linked then they need the heide. If someone tell the avie then they are linked. If the heide depolarize the avie then the heide tell the leontine. If someone race the leontine and they chase the trina then the trina race the leontine. If someone is bulbed then they need the leontine. The avie tell the avie.", "logic": "\nDepolarize(avie, heide)\nRace(avie, trina)\nDepolarize(heide, avie)\nDepolarize(heide, trina)\nDepolarize(heide, leontine)\nDepolarize(trina, avie)\nRace(trina, leontine)\nAntinomian(leontine)\nFunny(leontine)\nRace(leontine, trina)\nTell(heide, trina) -> Bulbed(heide)\nforall x (Linked(x) -> Race(x, heide))\nforall x (Depolarize(x, trina) -> Tell(x, trina))\nforall x (Linked(x) -> Race(x, heide))\nforall x (Tell(x, avie) -> Linked(x))\nDepolarize(heide, avie) -> Tell(heide, leontine)\nforall x (Race(x, leontine) and Depolarize(x, trina) -> Race(trina, leontine))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) -> Race(x, leontine))\n\nTell(avie, avie)\n\nTell(avie, avie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The carroll acquire the alysa. The carroll honk the amelita. The alysa acquire the carroll. The alysa acquire the amelita. The alysa acquire the adolf. The amelita acquire the carroll. The amelita honk the adolf. The adolf is alfresco. The adolf is nighted. The adolf honk the amelita. If the alysa beatify the amelita then the alysa is aphanitic. If someone is conveyable then they need the alysa. If someone acquire the amelita then they eat the amelita. If someone is conveyable then they need the alysa. If someone beatify the carroll then they are conveyable. If the alysa acquire the carroll then the alysa beatify the adolf. If someone honk the adolf and they chase the amelita then the amelita honk the adolf. If someone is aphanitic then they need the adolf. The amelita does not eat the adolf.", "logic": "\nAcquire(carroll, alysa)\nHonk(carroll, amelita)\nAcquire(alysa, carroll)\nAcquire(alysa, amelita)\nAcquire(alysa, adolf)\nAcquire(amelita, carroll)\nHonk(amelita, adolf)\nAlfresco(adolf)\nNighted(adolf)\nHonk(adolf, amelita)\nBeatify(alysa, amelita) -> Aphanitic(alysa)\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Honk(x, alysa))\nforall x (Acquire(x, amelita) -> Beatify(x, amelita))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Honk(x, alysa))\nforall x (Beatify(x, carroll) -> Conveyable(x))\nAcquire(alysa, carroll) -> Beatify(alysa, adolf)\nforall x (Honk(x, adolf) and Acquire(x, amelita) -> Honk(amelita, adolf))\nforall x (Aphanitic(x) -> Honk(x, adolf))\n\nnot Beatify(amelita, adolf)\n\nnot Beatify(amelita, adolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The brigitte respond the radcliffe. The brigitte truck the wiley. The radcliffe respond the brigitte. The radcliffe respond the wiley. The radcliffe respond the marylee. The wiley respond the brigitte. The wiley truck the marylee. The marylee is isolable. The marylee is washable. The marylee truck the wiley. If the radcliffe despatch the wiley then the radcliffe is xxxviii. If someone is mitral then they need the radcliffe. If someone respond the wiley then they eat the wiley. If someone is mitral then they need the radcliffe. If someone despatch the brigitte then they are mitral. If the radcliffe respond the brigitte then the radcliffe despatch the marylee. If someone truck the marylee and they chase the wiley then the wiley truck the marylee. If someone is xxxviii then they need the marylee. The marylee despatch the marylee.", "logic": "\nRespond(brigitte, radcliffe)\nTruck(brigitte, wiley)\nRespond(radcliffe, brigitte)\nRespond(radcliffe, wiley)\nRespond(radcliffe, marylee)\nRespond(wiley, brigitte)\nTruck(wiley, marylee)\nIsolable(marylee)\nWashable(marylee)\nTruck(marylee, wiley)\nDespatch(radcliffe, wiley) -> Xxxviii(radcliffe)\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> Truck(x, radcliffe))\nforall x (Respond(x, wiley) -> Despatch(x, wiley))\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> Truck(x, radcliffe))\nforall x (Despatch(x, brigitte) -> Mitral(x))\nRespond(radcliffe, brigitte) -> Despatch(radcliffe, marylee)\nforall x (Truck(x, marylee) and Respond(x, wiley) -> Truck(wiley, marylee))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Truck(x, marylee))\n\nDespatch(marylee, marylee)\n\nDespatch(marylee, marylee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Simon is delimited. Fletcher is whirring. David is untidy. All whirring things are threepenny. All cetaceous things are untidy. If something is threepenny and whirring then it is cetaceous. Simon is delimited.", "logic": "\nDelimited(simon)\nWhirring(fletcher)\nUntidy(david)\nforall x (Whirring(x) -> Threepenny(x))\nforall x (Cetaceous(x) -> Untidy(x))\nforall x (Threepenny(x) and Whirring(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\n\nDelimited(simon)\n\ntherefore Delimited(simon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Tray is billed. Janith is pissed. Langston is three. All pissed things are lxviii. All inferior things are three. If something is lxviii and pissed then it is inferior. Langston is not three.", "logic": "\nBilled(tray)\nPissed(janith)\nThree(langston)\nforall x (Pissed(x) -> Lxviii(x))\nforall x (Inferior(x) -> Three(x))\nforall x (Lxviii(x) and Pissed(x) -> Inferior(x))\n\nnot Three(langston)\n\ntherefore Three(langston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Deanne is chafflike. Layla is helminthic. Darsey is randomised. All helminthic things are sinitic. All skewed things are randomised. If something is sinitic and helminthic then it is skewed. Layla is sinitic.", "logic": "\nChafflike(deanne)\nHelminthic(layla)\nRandomised(darsey)\nforall x (Helminthic(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Skewed(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) and Helminthic(x) -> Skewed(x))\n\nSinitic(layla)\n\nHelminthic(layla) and forall x (Helminthic(x) -> Sinitic(x)) -> therefore Sinitic(layla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Libby is mistakable. Rand is motorised. Betty is bounden. All motorised things are ownerless. All apothecial things are bounden. If something is ownerless and motorised then it is apothecial. Rand is not ownerless.", "logic": "\nMistakable(libby)\nMotorised(rand)\nBounden(betty)\nforall x (Motorised(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Apothecial(x) -> Bounden(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) and Motorised(x) -> Apothecial(x))\n\nnot Ownerless(rand)\n\nMotorised(rand) and forall x (Motorised(x) -> Ownerless(x)) -> therefore Ownerless(rand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Chet is dazzling. Romola is neuronic. Franky is bosomy. All neuronic things are limited. All lyric things are bosomy. If something is limited and neuronic then it is lyric. Romola is lyric.", "logic": "\nDazzling(chet)\nNeuronic(romola)\nBosomy(franky)\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Limited(x))\nforall x (Lyric(x) -> Bosomy(x))\nforall x (Limited(x) and Neuronic(x) -> Lyric(x))\n\nLyric(romola)\n\nNeuronic(romola) and forall x (Neuronic(x) -> Limited(x)) -> therefore Limited(romola) Limited(romola) and Neuronic(romola) and forall x (Limited(x) and Neuronic(x) -> Lyric(x)) -> therefore Lyric(romola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Cathleen is mortifying. Kerrie is final. Lanni is offshore. All final things are monarchal. All assuasive things are offshore. If something is monarchal and final then it is assuasive. Kerrie is not assuasive.", "logic": "\nMortifying(cathleen)\nFinal(kerrie)\nOffshore(lanni)\nforall x (Final(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) -> Offshore(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) and Final(x) -> Assuasive(x))\n\nnot Assuasive(kerrie)\n\nFinal(kerrie) and forall x (Final(x) -> Monarchal(x)) -> therefore Monarchal(kerrie) Monarchal(kerrie) and Final(kerrie) and forall x (Monarchal(x) and Final(x) -> Assuasive(x)) -> therefore Assuasive(kerrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Deonne is anorthitic. Vernice is weeping. Tiphany is ectodermic. All weeping things are lathery. All hygienic things are ectodermic. If something is lathery and weeping then it is hygienic. Vernice is ectodermic.", "logic": "\nAnorthitic(deonne)\nWeeping(vernice)\nEctodermic(tiphany)\nforall x (Weeping(x) -> Lathery(x))\nforall x (Hygienic(x) -> Ectodermic(x))\nforall x (Lathery(x) and Weeping(x) -> Hygienic(x))\n\nEctodermic(vernice)\n\nWeeping(vernice) and forall x (Weeping(x) -> Lathery(x)) -> therefore Lathery(vernice) Lathery(vernice) and Weeping(vernice) and forall x (Lathery(x) and Weeping(x) -> Hygienic(x)) -> therefore Hygienic(vernice) Hygienic(vernice) and forall x (Hygienic(x) -> Ectodermic(x)) -> therefore Ectodermic(vernice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Major is buff. Luna is upland. Alexia is irrational. All upland things are daunting. All unequipped things are irrational. If something is daunting and upland then it is unequipped. Luna is not irrational.", "logic": "\nBuff(major)\nUpland(luna)\nIrrational(alexia)\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Daunting(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Irrational(x))\nforall x (Daunting(x) and Upland(x) -> Unequipped(x))\n\nnot Irrational(luna)\n\nUpland(luna) and forall x (Upland(x) -> Daunting(x)) -> therefore Daunting(luna) Daunting(luna) and Upland(luna) and forall x (Daunting(x) and Upland(x) -> Unequipped(x)) -> therefore Unequipped(luna) Unequipped(luna) and forall x (Unequipped(x) -> Irrational(x)) -> therefore Irrational(luna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Carolynn is endoergic. Gwendolin is enervated. Nataline is arching. All enervated things are fugly. All lone things are arching. If something is fugly and enervated then it is lone. Carolynn is not fugly.", "logic": "\nEndoergic(carolynn)\nEnervated(gwendolin)\nArching(nataline)\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Arching(x))\nforall x (Fugly(x) and Enervated(x) -> Lone(x))\n\nnot Fugly(carolynn)\n\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Fugly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Deni is misogynous. Fleur is crushing. Hali is animistic. All crushing things are agleam. All ethnologic things are animistic. If something is agleam and crushing then it is ethnologic. Deni is ethnologic.", "logic": "\nMisogynous(deni)\nCrushing(fleur)\nAnimistic(hali)\nforall x (Crushing(x) -> Agleam(x))\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> Animistic(x))\nforall x (Agleam(x) and Crushing(x) -> Ethnologic(x))\n\nEthnologic(deni)\n\nforall x (Agleam(x) and Crushing(x) -> Ethnologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Standford is throbbing. Allsun is hypnotic. Anton is perirhinal. All hypnotic things are edged. All unmown things are perirhinal. If something is edged and hypnotic then it is unmown. Standford is not perirhinal.", "logic": "\nThrobbing(standford)\nHypnotic(allsun)\nPerirhinal(anton)\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Unmown(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Edged(x) and Hypnotic(x) -> Unmown(x))\n\nnot Perirhinal(standford)\n\nforall x (Unmown(x) -> Perirhinal(x)) <- forall x (Edged(x) and Hypnotic(x) -> Unmown(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Trude is nigerian. Myrta is stock. Clifton is rancid. All stock things are drugged. All unmarried things are rancid. If something is drugged and stock then it is unmarried. Clifton is unmarried.", "logic": "\nNigerian(trude)\nStock(myrta)\nRancid(clifton)\nforall x (Stock(x) -> Drugged(x))\nforall x (Unmarried(x) -> Rancid(x))\nforall x (Drugged(x) and Stock(x) -> Unmarried(x))\n\nUnmarried(clifton)\n\nforall x (Drugged(x) and Stock(x) -> Unmarried(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Boyd is anasarcous. Rosabella is plucked. Rivy is patellar. All plucked things are jolty. All unratified things are patellar. If something is jolty and plucked then it is unratified. Rivy is not nice.", "logic": "\nAnasarcous(boyd)\nPlucked(rosabella)\nPatellar(rivy)\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Jolty(x))\nforall x (Unratified(x) -> Patellar(x))\nforall x (Jolty(x) and Plucked(x) -> Unratified(x))\n\nnot Nice(rivy)\n\nnot Nice(rivy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Mickie is femoral. Dove is sweet. Ruperto is ochre. All sweet things are tilled. All discordant things are ochre. If something is tilled and sweet then it is discordant. Dove is nice.", "logic": "\nFemoral(mickie)\nSweet(dove)\nOchre(ruperto)\nforall x (Sweet(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> Ochre(x))\nforall x (Tilled(x) and Sweet(x) -> Discordant(x))\n\nNice(dove)\n\nNice(dove) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Connor is sauteed. Garrot is surefooted. Claudine is cuplike. All surefooted things are aglitter. All searing things are cuplike. If something is aglitter and surefooted then it is searing. Connor is not young.", "logic": "\nSauteed(connor)\nSurefooted(garrot)\nCuplike(claudine)\nforall x (Surefooted(x) -> Aglitter(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nforall x (Aglitter(x) and Surefooted(x) -> Searing(x))\n\nnot Young(connor)\n\nnot Young(connor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Loralee is slumbrous. Felicle is quadruplex. Michale is orbitual. All quadruplex things are atrophic. All auburn things are orbitual. If something is atrophic and quadruplex then it is auburn. Michale is young.", "logic": "\nSlumbrous(loralee)\nQuadruplex(felicle)\nOrbitual(michale)\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) -> Atrophic(x))\nforall x (Auburn(x) -> Orbitual(x))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) and Quadruplex(x) -> Auburn(x))\n\nYoung(michale)\n\nYoung(michale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "The cesar penalise the allina. The cesar is multiform. The cesar is reflected. The cesar labor the allina. The cesar labor the uriah. The allina penalise the uriah. The allina is fanlike. The allina drown the cesar. The allina labor the cesar. The uriah is fanlike. The uriah is multiform. The uriah drown the cesar. The uriah drown the allina. The uriah labor the cesar. The uriah labor the allina. If something labor the cesar then it drown the allina. If something is reflected and it drown the cesar then it is crappy. If something is crappy and it labor the allina then it penalise the allina. If something penalise the cesar and the cesar is reflected then it is reflected. If something is multiform and reflected then it drown the uriah. If something is fanlike and it labor the allina then it penalise the cesar. The cesar penalise the allina.", "logic": "\nPenalise(cesar, allina)\nMultiform(cesar)\nReflected(cesar)\nLabor(cesar, allina)\nLabor(cesar, uriah)\nPenalise(allina, uriah)\nFanlike(allina)\nDrown(allina, cesar)\nLabor(allina, cesar)\nFanlike(uriah)\nMultiform(uriah)\nDrown(uriah, cesar)\nDrown(uriah, allina)\nLabor(uriah, cesar)\nLabor(uriah, allina)\nforall x (Labor(x, cesar) -> Drown(x, allina))\nforall x (Reflected(x) and Drown(x, cesar) -> Crappy(x))\nforall x (Crappy(x) and Labor(x, allina) -> Penalise(x, allina))\nforall x (Penalise(x, cesar) and Reflected(cesar) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Multiform(x) and Reflected(x) -> Drown(x, uriah))\nforall x (Fanlike(x) and Labor(x, allina) -> Penalise(x, cesar))\n\nPenalise(cesar, allina)\n\ntherefore Penalise(cesar, allina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The bradly damn the hew. The bradly is offended. The bradly is pulverized. The bradly catalyze the hew. The bradly catalyze the mindy. The hew damn the mindy. The hew is reflex. The hew obey the bradly. The hew catalyze the bradly. The mindy is reflex. The mindy is offended. The mindy obey the bradly. The mindy obey the hew. The mindy catalyze the bradly. The mindy catalyze the hew. If something catalyze the bradly then it obey the hew. If something is pulverized and it obey the bradly then it is partible. If something is partible and it catalyze the hew then it damn the hew. If something damn the bradly and the bradly is pulverized then it is pulverized. If something is offended and pulverized then it obey the mindy. If something is reflex and it catalyze the hew then it damn the bradly. The hew does not like the bradly.", "logic": "\nDamn(bradly, hew)\nOffended(bradly)\nPulverized(bradly)\nCatalyze(bradly, hew)\nCatalyze(bradly, mindy)\nDamn(hew, mindy)\nReflex(hew)\nObey(hew, bradly)\nCatalyze(hew, bradly)\nReflex(mindy)\nOffended(mindy)\nObey(mindy, bradly)\nObey(mindy, hew)\nCatalyze(mindy, bradly)\nCatalyze(mindy, hew)\nforall x (Catalyze(x, bradly) -> Obey(x, hew))\nforall x (Pulverized(x) and Obey(x, bradly) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) and Catalyze(x, hew) -> Damn(x, hew))\nforall x (Damn(x, bradly) and Pulverized(bradly) -> Pulverized(x))\nforall x (Offended(x) and Pulverized(x) -> Obey(x, mindy))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Catalyze(x, hew) -> Damn(x, bradly))\n\nnot Obey(hew, bradly)\n\ntherefore Obey(hew, bradly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The paddy contract the loren. The paddy is divine. The paddy is broody. The paddy bail the loren. The paddy bail the gilberte. The loren contract the gilberte. The loren is sexual. The loren amuse the paddy. The loren bail the paddy. The gilberte is sexual. The gilberte is divine. The gilberte amuse the paddy. The gilberte amuse the loren. The gilberte bail the paddy. The gilberte bail the loren. If something bail the paddy then it amuse the loren. If something is broody and it amuse the paddy then it is silklike. If something is silklike and it bail the loren then it contract the loren. If something contract the paddy and the paddy is broody then it is broody. If something is divine and broody then it amuse the gilberte. If something is sexual and it bail the loren then it contract the paddy. The loren amuse the loren.", "logic": "\nContract(paddy, loren)\nDivine(paddy)\nBroody(paddy)\nBail(paddy, loren)\nBail(paddy, gilberte)\nContract(loren, gilberte)\nSexual(loren)\nAmuse(loren, paddy)\nBail(loren, paddy)\nSexual(gilberte)\nDivine(gilberte)\nAmuse(gilberte, paddy)\nAmuse(gilberte, loren)\nBail(gilberte, paddy)\nBail(gilberte, loren)\nforall x (Bail(x, paddy) -> Amuse(x, loren))\nforall x (Broody(x) and Amuse(x, paddy) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Silklike(x) and Bail(x, loren) -> Contract(x, loren))\nforall x (Contract(x, paddy) and Broody(paddy) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Divine(x) and Broody(x) -> Amuse(x, gilberte))\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Bail(x, loren) -> Contract(x, paddy))\n\nAmuse(loren, loren)\n\nBail(loren, paddy) and forall x (Bail(x, paddy) -> Amuse(x, loren)) -> therefore Amuse(loren, loren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The dorit fashion the auria. The dorit is aquaphobic. The dorit is forced. The dorit vitrify the auria. The dorit vitrify the meridel. The auria fashion the meridel. The auria is crank. The auria ready the dorit. The auria vitrify the dorit. The meridel is crank. The meridel is aquaphobic. The meridel ready the dorit. The meridel ready the auria. The meridel vitrify the dorit. The meridel vitrify the auria. If something vitrify the dorit then it ready the auria. If something is forced and it ready the dorit then it is burundian. If something is burundian and it vitrify the auria then it fashion the auria. If something fashion the dorit and the dorit is forced then it is forced. If something is aquaphobic and forced then it ready the meridel. If something is crank and it vitrify the auria then it fashion the dorit. The auria does not like the auria.", "logic": "\nFashion(dorit, auria)\nAquaphobic(dorit)\nForced(dorit)\nVitrify(dorit, auria)\nVitrify(dorit, meridel)\nFashion(auria, meridel)\nCrank(auria)\nReady(auria, dorit)\nVitrify(auria, dorit)\nCrank(meridel)\nAquaphobic(meridel)\nReady(meridel, dorit)\nReady(meridel, auria)\nVitrify(meridel, dorit)\nVitrify(meridel, auria)\nforall x (Vitrify(x, dorit) -> Ready(x, auria))\nforall x (Forced(x) and Ready(x, dorit) -> Burundian(x))\nforall x (Burundian(x) and Vitrify(x, auria) -> Fashion(x, auria))\nforall x (Fashion(x, dorit) and Forced(dorit) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Aquaphobic(x) and Forced(x) -> Ready(x, meridel))\nforall x (Crank(x) and Vitrify(x, auria) -> Fashion(x, dorit))\n\nnot Ready(auria, auria)\n\nVitrify(auria, dorit) and forall x (Vitrify(x, dorit) -> Ready(x, auria)) -> therefore Ready(auria, auria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The benjamen foreshadow the danny. The benjamen is hanoverian. The benjamen is inelastic. The benjamen resublime the danny. The benjamen resublime the dorothy. The danny foreshadow the dorothy. The danny is scented. The danny rest the benjamen. The danny resublime the benjamen. The dorothy is scented. The dorothy is hanoverian. The dorothy rest the benjamen. The dorothy rest the danny. The dorothy resublime the benjamen. The dorothy resublime the danny. If something resublime the benjamen then it rest the danny. If something is inelastic and it rest the benjamen then it is whirring. If something is whirring and it resublime the danny then it foreshadow the danny. If something foreshadow the benjamen and the benjamen is inelastic then it is inelastic. If something is hanoverian and inelastic then it rest the dorothy. If something is scented and it resublime the danny then it foreshadow the benjamen. The dorothy is inelastic.", "logic": "\nForeshadow(benjamen, danny)\nHanoverian(benjamen)\nInelastic(benjamen)\nResublime(benjamen, danny)\nResublime(benjamen, dorothy)\nForeshadow(danny, dorothy)\nScented(danny)\nRest(danny, benjamen)\nResublime(danny, benjamen)\nScented(dorothy)\nHanoverian(dorothy)\nRest(dorothy, benjamen)\nRest(dorothy, danny)\nResublime(dorothy, benjamen)\nResublime(dorothy, danny)\nforall x (Resublime(x, benjamen) -> Rest(x, danny))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Rest(x, benjamen) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Whirring(x) and Resublime(x, danny) -> Foreshadow(x, danny))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, benjamen) and Inelastic(benjamen) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Hanoverian(x) and Inelastic(x) -> Rest(x, dorothy))\nforall x (Scented(x) and Resublime(x, danny) -> Foreshadow(x, benjamen))\n\nInelastic(dorothy)\n\nScented(dorothy) and Resublime(dorothy, danny) and forall x (Scented(x) and Resublime(x, danny) -> Foreshadow(x, benjamen)) -> therefore Foreshadow(dorothy, benjamen) Foreshadow(dorothy, benjamen) and Inelastic(benjamen) and forall x (Foreshadow(x, benjamen) and Inelastic(benjamen) -> Inelastic(x)) -> therefore Inelastic(dorothy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The darby bemire the phillida. The darby is donnian. The darby is hale. The darby rubbish the phillida. The darby rubbish the tatiania. The phillida bemire the tatiania. The phillida is piercing. The phillida shush the darby. The phillida rubbish the darby. The tatiania is piercing. The tatiania is donnian. The tatiania shush the darby. The tatiania shush the phillida. The tatiania rubbish the darby. The tatiania rubbish the phillida. If something rubbish the darby then it shush the phillida. If something is hale and it shush the darby then it is inelastic. If something is inelastic and it rubbish the phillida then it bemire the phillida. If something bemire the darby and the darby is hale then it is hale. If something is donnian and hale then it shush the tatiania. If something is piercing and it rubbish the phillida then it bemire the darby. The tatiania is not hale.", "logic": "\nBemire(darby, phillida)\nDonnian(darby)\nHale(darby)\nRubbish(darby, phillida)\nRubbish(darby, tatiania)\nBemire(phillida, tatiania)\nPiercing(phillida)\nShush(phillida, darby)\nRubbish(phillida, darby)\nPiercing(tatiania)\nDonnian(tatiania)\nShush(tatiania, darby)\nShush(tatiania, phillida)\nRubbish(tatiania, darby)\nRubbish(tatiania, phillida)\nforall x (Rubbish(x, darby) -> Shush(x, phillida))\nforall x (Hale(x) and Shush(x, darby) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Rubbish(x, phillida) -> Bemire(x, phillida))\nforall x (Bemire(x, darby) and Hale(darby) -> Hale(x))\nforall x (Donnian(x) and Hale(x) -> Shush(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Piercing(x) and Rubbish(x, phillida) -> Bemire(x, darby))\n\nnot Hale(tatiania)\n\nPiercing(tatiania) and Rubbish(tatiania, phillida) and forall x (Piercing(x) and Rubbish(x, phillida) -> Bemire(x, darby)) -> therefore Bemire(tatiania, darby) Bemire(tatiania, darby) and Hale(darby) and forall x (Bemire(x, darby) and Hale(darby) -> Hale(x)) -> therefore Hale(tatiania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The nilson company the elissa. The nilson is ethiopian. The nilson is semidark. The nilson overlap the elissa. The nilson overlap the geraldina. The elissa company the geraldina. The elissa is inclined. The elissa angulate the nilson. The elissa overlap the nilson. The geraldina is inclined. The geraldina is ethiopian. The geraldina angulate the nilson. The geraldina angulate the elissa. The geraldina overlap the nilson. The geraldina overlap the elissa. If something overlap the nilson then it angulate the elissa. If something is semidark and it angulate the nilson then it is polydactyl. If something is polydactyl and it overlap the elissa then it company the elissa. If something company the nilson and the nilson is semidark then it is semidark. If something is ethiopian and semidark then it angulate the geraldina. If something is inclined and it overlap the elissa then it company the nilson. The geraldina angulate the geraldina.", "logic": "\nCompany(nilson, elissa)\nEthiopian(nilson)\nSemidark(nilson)\nOverlap(nilson, elissa)\nOverlap(nilson, geraldina)\nCompany(elissa, geraldina)\nInclined(elissa)\nAngulate(elissa, nilson)\nOverlap(elissa, nilson)\nInclined(geraldina)\nEthiopian(geraldina)\nAngulate(geraldina, nilson)\nAngulate(geraldina, elissa)\nOverlap(geraldina, nilson)\nOverlap(geraldina, elissa)\nforall x (Overlap(x, nilson) -> Angulate(x, elissa))\nforall x (Semidark(x) and Angulate(x, nilson) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Overlap(x, elissa) -> Company(x, elissa))\nforall x (Company(x, nilson) and Semidark(nilson) -> Semidark(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) and Semidark(x) -> Angulate(x, geraldina))\nforall x (Inclined(x) and Overlap(x, elissa) -> Company(x, nilson))\n\nAngulate(geraldina, geraldina)\n\nInclined(geraldina) and Overlap(geraldina, elissa) and forall x (Inclined(x) and Overlap(x, elissa) -> Company(x, nilson)) -> therefore Company(geraldina, nilson) Company(geraldina, nilson) and Semidark(nilson) and forall x (Company(x, nilson) and Semidark(nilson) -> Semidark(x)) -> therefore Semidark(geraldina) Ethiopian(geraldina) and Semidark(geraldina) and forall x (Ethiopian(x) and Semidark(x) -> Angulate(x, geraldina)) -> therefore Angulate(geraldina, geraldina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The eve trivialize the charlotte. The eve is iambic. The eve is burdensome. The eve moan the charlotte. The eve moan the hagen. The charlotte trivialize the hagen. The charlotte is infamous. The charlotte intonate the eve. The charlotte moan the eve. The hagen is infamous. The hagen is iambic. The hagen intonate the eve. The hagen intonate the charlotte. The hagen moan the eve. The hagen moan the charlotte. If something moan the eve then it intonate the charlotte. If something is burdensome and it intonate the eve then it is starved. If something is starved and it moan the charlotte then it trivialize the charlotte. If something trivialize the eve and the eve is burdensome then it is burdensome. If something is iambic and burdensome then it intonate the hagen. If something is infamous and it moan the charlotte then it trivialize the eve. The hagen does not like the hagen.", "logic": "\nTrivialize(eve, charlotte)\nIambic(eve)\nBurdensome(eve)\nMoan(eve, charlotte)\nMoan(eve, hagen)\nTrivialize(charlotte, hagen)\nInfamous(charlotte)\nIntonate(charlotte, eve)\nMoan(charlotte, eve)\nInfamous(hagen)\nIambic(hagen)\nIntonate(hagen, eve)\nIntonate(hagen, charlotte)\nMoan(hagen, eve)\nMoan(hagen, charlotte)\nforall x (Moan(x, eve) -> Intonate(x, charlotte))\nforall x (Burdensome(x) and Intonate(x, eve) -> Starved(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) and Moan(x, charlotte) -> Trivialize(x, charlotte))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, eve) and Burdensome(eve) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Iambic(x) and Burdensome(x) -> Intonate(x, hagen))\nforall x (Infamous(x) and Moan(x, charlotte) -> Trivialize(x, eve))\n\nnot Intonate(hagen, hagen)\n\nInfamous(hagen) and Moan(hagen, charlotte) and forall x (Infamous(x) and Moan(x, charlotte) -> Trivialize(x, eve)) -> therefore Trivialize(hagen, eve) Trivialize(hagen, eve) and Burdensome(eve) and forall x (Trivialize(x, eve) and Burdensome(eve) -> Burdensome(x)) -> therefore Burdensome(hagen) Iambic(hagen) and Burdensome(hagen) and forall x (Iambic(x) and Burdensome(x) -> Intonate(x, hagen)) -> therefore Intonate(hagen, hagen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The nannette focalize the austine. The nannette is simulated. The nannette is moral. The nannette backhand the austine. The nannette backhand the juan. The austine focalize the juan. The austine is peckish. The austine disband the nannette. The austine backhand the nannette. The juan is peckish. The juan is simulated. The juan disband the nannette. The juan disband the austine. The juan backhand the nannette. The juan backhand the austine. If something backhand the nannette then it disband the austine. If something is moral and it disband the nannette then it is apish. If something is apish and it backhand the austine then it focalize the austine. If something focalize the nannette and the nannette is moral then it is moral. If something is simulated and moral then it disband the juan. If something is peckish and it backhand the austine then it focalize the nannette. The nannette is not apish.", "logic": "\nFocalize(nannette, austine)\nSimulated(nannette)\nMoral(nannette)\nBackhand(nannette, austine)\nBackhand(nannette, juan)\nFocalize(austine, juan)\nPeckish(austine)\nDisband(austine, nannette)\nBackhand(austine, nannette)\nPeckish(juan)\nSimulated(juan)\nDisband(juan, nannette)\nDisband(juan, austine)\nBackhand(juan, nannette)\nBackhand(juan, austine)\nforall x (Backhand(x, nannette) -> Disband(x, austine))\nforall x (Moral(x) and Disband(x, nannette) -> Apish(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) and Backhand(x, austine) -> Focalize(x, austine))\nforall x (Focalize(x, nannette) and Moral(nannette) -> Moral(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) and Moral(x) -> Disband(x, juan))\nforall x (Peckish(x) and Backhand(x, austine) -> Focalize(x, nannette))\n\nnot Apish(nannette)\n\nforall x (Moral(x) and Disband(x, nannette) -> Apish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The cathie achieve the tiffany. The cathie is obnoxious. The cathie is blockish. The cathie bream the tiffany. The cathie bream the simmonds. The tiffany achieve the simmonds. The tiffany is pained. The tiffany sloganeer the cathie. The tiffany bream the cathie. The simmonds is pained. The simmonds is obnoxious. The simmonds sloganeer the cathie. The simmonds sloganeer the tiffany. The simmonds bream the cathie. The simmonds bream the tiffany. If something bream the cathie then it sloganeer the tiffany. If something is blockish and it sloganeer the cathie then it is unaddicted. If something is unaddicted and it bream the tiffany then it achieve the tiffany. If something achieve the cathie and the cathie is blockish then it is blockish. If something is obnoxious and blockish then it sloganeer the simmonds. If something is pained and it bream the tiffany then it achieve the cathie. The cathie achieve the cathie.", "logic": "\nAchieve(cathie, tiffany)\nObnoxious(cathie)\nBlockish(cathie)\nBream(cathie, tiffany)\nBream(cathie, simmonds)\nAchieve(tiffany, simmonds)\nPained(tiffany)\nSloganeer(tiffany, cathie)\nBream(tiffany, cathie)\nPained(simmonds)\nObnoxious(simmonds)\nSloganeer(simmonds, cathie)\nSloganeer(simmonds, tiffany)\nBream(simmonds, cathie)\nBream(simmonds, tiffany)\nforall x (Bream(x, cathie) -> Sloganeer(x, tiffany))\nforall x (Blockish(x) and Sloganeer(x, cathie) -> Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) and Bream(x, tiffany) -> Achieve(x, tiffany))\nforall x (Achieve(x, cathie) and Blockish(cathie) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) and Blockish(x) -> Sloganeer(x, simmonds))\nforall x (Pained(x) and Bream(x, tiffany) -> Achieve(x, cathie))\n\nAchieve(cathie, cathie)\n\nforall x (Pained(x) and Bream(x, tiffany) -> Achieve(x, cathie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The tomkin reshuffle the joby. The tomkin is cambodian. The tomkin is insecure. The tomkin forsake the joby. The tomkin forsake the rachel. The joby reshuffle the rachel. The joby is ambagious. The joby maintain the tomkin. The joby forsake the tomkin. The rachel is ambagious. The rachel is cambodian. The rachel maintain the tomkin. The rachel maintain the joby. The rachel forsake the tomkin. The rachel forsake the joby. If something forsake the tomkin then it maintain the joby. If something is insecure and it maintain the tomkin then it is cloistered. If something is cloistered and it forsake the joby then it reshuffle the joby. If something reshuffle the tomkin and the tomkin is insecure then it is insecure. If something is cambodian and insecure then it maintain the rachel. If something is ambagious and it forsake the joby then it reshuffle the tomkin. The joby does not chase the joby.", "logic": "\nReshuffle(tomkin, joby)\nCambodian(tomkin)\nInsecure(tomkin)\nForsake(tomkin, joby)\nForsake(tomkin, rachel)\nReshuffle(joby, rachel)\nAmbagious(joby)\nMaintain(joby, tomkin)\nForsake(joby, tomkin)\nAmbagious(rachel)\nCambodian(rachel)\nMaintain(rachel, tomkin)\nMaintain(rachel, joby)\nForsake(rachel, tomkin)\nForsake(rachel, joby)\nforall x (Forsake(x, tomkin) -> Maintain(x, joby))\nforall x (Insecure(x) and Maintain(x, tomkin) -> Cloistered(x))\nforall x (Cloistered(x) and Forsake(x, joby) -> Reshuffle(x, joby))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, tomkin) and Insecure(tomkin) -> Insecure(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and Insecure(x) -> Maintain(x, rachel))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) and Forsake(x, joby) -> Reshuffle(x, tomkin))\n\nnot Reshuffle(joby, joby)\n\nforall x (Cloistered(x) and Forsake(x, joby) -> Reshuffle(x, joby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The gere munition the shane. The gere is uncoerced. The gere is behind. The gere select the shane. The gere select the chantal. The shane munition the chantal. The shane is bordered. The shane lift the gere. The shane select the gere. The chantal is bordered. The chantal is uncoerced. The chantal lift the gere. The chantal lift the shane. The chantal select the gere. The chantal select the shane. If something select the gere then it lift the shane. If something is behind and it lift the gere then it is crocked. If something is crocked and it select the shane then it munition the shane. If something munition the gere and the gere is behind then it is behind. If something is uncoerced and behind then it lift the chantal. If something is bordered and it select the shane then it munition the gere. The shane munition the gere.", "logic": "\nMunition(gere, shane)\nUncoerced(gere)\nBehind(gere)\nSelect(gere, shane)\nSelect(gere, chantal)\nMunition(shane, chantal)\nBordered(shane)\nLift(shane, gere)\nSelect(shane, gere)\nBordered(chantal)\nUncoerced(chantal)\nLift(chantal, gere)\nLift(chantal, shane)\nSelect(chantal, gere)\nSelect(chantal, shane)\nforall x (Select(x, gere) -> Lift(x, shane))\nforall x (Behind(x) and Lift(x, gere) -> Crocked(x))\nforall x (Crocked(x) and Select(x, shane) -> Munition(x, shane))\nforall x (Munition(x, gere) and Behind(gere) -> Behind(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) and Behind(x) -> Lift(x, chantal))\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Select(x, shane) -> Munition(x, gere))\n\nMunition(shane, gere)\n\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Select(x, shane) -> Munition(x, gere)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The dean sing the britta. The dean is confounded. The dean is parky. The dean spear the britta. The dean spear the mart. The britta sing the mart. The britta is celibate. The britta razor the dean. The britta spear the dean. The mart is celibate. The mart is confounded. The mart razor the dean. The mart razor the britta. The mart spear the dean. The mart spear the britta. If something spear the dean then it razor the britta. If something is parky and it razor the dean then it is mandibular. If something is mandibular and it spear the britta then it sing the britta. If something sing the dean and the dean is parky then it is parky. If something is confounded and parky then it razor the mart. If something is celibate and it spear the britta then it sing the dean. The britta does not visit the britta.", "logic": "\nSing(dean, britta)\nConfounded(dean)\nParky(dean)\nSpear(dean, britta)\nSpear(dean, mart)\nSing(britta, mart)\nCelibate(britta)\nRazor(britta, dean)\nSpear(britta, dean)\nCelibate(mart)\nConfounded(mart)\nRazor(mart, dean)\nRazor(mart, britta)\nSpear(mart, dean)\nSpear(mart, britta)\nforall x (Spear(x, dean) -> Razor(x, britta))\nforall x (Parky(x) and Razor(x, dean) -> Mandibular(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) and Spear(x, britta) -> Sing(x, britta))\nforall x (Sing(x, dean) and Parky(dean) -> Parky(x))\nforall x (Confounded(x) and Parky(x) -> Razor(x, mart))\nforall x (Celibate(x) and Spear(x, britta) -> Sing(x, dean))\n\nnot Spear(britta, britta)\n\nnot Spear(britta, britta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The zarah complexify the jessalyn. The zarah is hearable. The zarah is racial. The zarah gluttonize the jessalyn. The zarah gluttonize the nealy. The jessalyn complexify the nealy. The jessalyn is knowable. The jessalyn decant the zarah. The jessalyn gluttonize the zarah. The nealy is knowable. The nealy is hearable. The nealy decant the zarah. The nealy decant the jessalyn. The nealy gluttonize the zarah. The nealy gluttonize the jessalyn. If something gluttonize the zarah then it decant the jessalyn. If something is racial and it decant the zarah then it is occasional. If something is occasional and it gluttonize the jessalyn then it complexify the jessalyn. If something complexify the zarah and the zarah is racial then it is racial. If something is hearable and racial then it decant the nealy. If something is knowable and it gluttonize the jessalyn then it complexify the zarah. The zarah gluttonize the zarah.", "logic": "\nComplexify(zarah, jessalyn)\nHearable(zarah)\nRacial(zarah)\nGluttonize(zarah, jessalyn)\nGluttonize(zarah, nealy)\nComplexify(jessalyn, nealy)\nKnowable(jessalyn)\nDecant(jessalyn, zarah)\nGluttonize(jessalyn, zarah)\nKnowable(nealy)\nHearable(nealy)\nDecant(nealy, zarah)\nDecant(nealy, jessalyn)\nGluttonize(nealy, zarah)\nGluttonize(nealy, jessalyn)\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, zarah) -> Decant(x, jessalyn))\nforall x (Racial(x) and Decant(x, zarah) -> Occasional(x))\nforall x (Occasional(x) and Gluttonize(x, jessalyn) -> Complexify(x, jessalyn))\nforall x (Complexify(x, zarah) and Racial(zarah) -> Racial(x))\nforall x (Hearable(x) and Racial(x) -> Decant(x, nealy))\nforall x (Knowable(x) and Gluttonize(x, jessalyn) -> Complexify(x, zarah))\n\nGluttonize(zarah, zarah)\n\nGluttonize(zarah, zarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The tillie house the zondra. The tillie is slithering. The tillie is exhausting. The tillie waggle the zondra. The tillie waggle the celestia. The zondra house the celestia. The zondra is subsidised. The zondra eternalise the tillie. The zondra waggle the tillie. The celestia is subsidised. The celestia is slithering. The celestia eternalise the tillie. The celestia eternalise the zondra. The celestia waggle the tillie. The celestia waggle the zondra. If something waggle the tillie then it eternalise the zondra. If something is exhausting and it eternalise the tillie then it is spacey. If something is spacey and it waggle the zondra then it house the zondra. If something house the tillie and the tillie is exhausting then it is exhausting. If something is slithering and exhausting then it eternalise the celestia. If something is subsidised and it waggle the zondra then it house the tillie. The zondra is not green.", "logic": "\nHouse(tillie, zondra)\nSlithering(tillie)\nExhausting(tillie)\nWaggle(tillie, zondra)\nWaggle(tillie, celestia)\nHouse(zondra, celestia)\nSubsidised(zondra)\nEternalise(zondra, tillie)\nWaggle(zondra, tillie)\nSubsidised(celestia)\nSlithering(celestia)\nEternalise(celestia, tillie)\nEternalise(celestia, zondra)\nWaggle(celestia, tillie)\nWaggle(celestia, zondra)\nforall x (Waggle(x, tillie) -> Eternalise(x, zondra))\nforall x (Exhausting(x) and Eternalise(x, tillie) -> Spacey(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) and Waggle(x, zondra) -> House(x, zondra))\nforall x (House(x, tillie) and Exhausting(tillie) -> Exhausting(x))\nforall x (Slithering(x) and Exhausting(x) -> Eternalise(x, celestia))\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Waggle(x, zondra) -> House(x, tillie))\n\nnot Green(zondra)\n\nnot Green(zondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The orel exalt the valerie. The orel is shod. The orel is sericeous. The orel overreach the valerie. The orel overreach the stanleigh. The valerie exalt the stanleigh. The valerie is afloat. The valerie permute the orel. The valerie overreach the orel. The stanleigh is afloat. The stanleigh is shod. The stanleigh permute the orel. The stanleigh permute the valerie. The stanleigh overreach the orel. The stanleigh overreach the valerie. If something overreach the orel then it permute the valerie. If something is sericeous and it permute the orel then it is recursive. If something is recursive and it overreach the valerie then it exalt the valerie. If something exalt the orel and the orel is sericeous then it is sericeous. If something is shod and sericeous then it permute the stanleigh. If something is afloat and it overreach the valerie then it exalt the orel. The stanleigh exalt the stanleigh.", "logic": "\nExalt(orel, valerie)\nShod(orel)\nSericeous(orel)\nOverreach(orel, valerie)\nOverreach(orel, stanleigh)\nExalt(valerie, stanleigh)\nAfloat(valerie)\nPermute(valerie, orel)\nOverreach(valerie, orel)\nAfloat(stanleigh)\nShod(stanleigh)\nPermute(stanleigh, orel)\nPermute(stanleigh, valerie)\nOverreach(stanleigh, orel)\nOverreach(stanleigh, valerie)\nforall x (Overreach(x, orel) -> Permute(x, valerie))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Permute(x, orel) -> Recursive(x))\nforall x (Recursive(x) and Overreach(x, valerie) -> Exalt(x, valerie))\nforall x (Exalt(x, orel) and Sericeous(orel) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Shod(x) and Sericeous(x) -> Permute(x, stanleigh))\nforall x (Afloat(x) and Overreach(x, valerie) -> Exalt(x, orel))\n\nExalt(stanleigh, stanleigh)\n\nExalt(stanleigh, stanleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The sarette is not erotic. The sarette polemicise the sile. The lawerence polemicise the sarette. The amata is frisky. The amata sate the lawerence. The amata polemicise the sarette. The amata polemicise the sile. The sile spin the lawerence. The sile spin the amata. The sile is uncanny. If something is latinate then it spin the sarette. If something polemicise the sarette then the sarette is latinate. If something spin the sarette then the sarette does not visit the lawerence. If something polemicise the lawerence then it is latinate. If something is frisky and it polemicise the lawerence then it sate the sarette. If something is latinate and it does not chase the amata then it spin the sile. If something polemicise the sile and it sate the sarette then it does not like the amata. If something is latinate and it does not like the sarette then it is morbid. The lawerence polemicise the sarette.", "logic": "\nnot Erotic(sarette)\nPolemicise(sarette, sile)\nPolemicise(lawerence, sarette)\nFrisky(amata)\nSate(amata, lawerence)\nPolemicise(amata, sarette)\nPolemicise(amata, sile)\nSpin(sile, lawerence)\nSpin(sile, amata)\nUncanny(sile)\nforall x (Latinate(x) -> Spin(x, sarette))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, sarette) -> Latinate(sarette))\nforall x (Spin(x, sarette) -> not Polemicise(sarette, lawerence))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, lawerence) -> Latinate(x))\nforall x (Frisky(x) and Polemicise(x, lawerence) -> Sate(x, sarette))\nforall x (Latinate(x) and not Spin(x, amata) -> Spin(x, sile))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, sile) and Sate(x, sarette) -> not Sate(x, amata))\nforall x (Latinate(x) and not Sate(x, sarette) -> Morbid(x))\n\nPolemicise(lawerence, sarette)\n\ntherefore Polemicise(lawerence, sarette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The dustin is not diaphysial. The dustin roam the ulrick. The malvina roam the dustin. The adelina is tried. The adelina gaze the malvina. The adelina roam the dustin. The adelina roam the ulrick. The ulrick overpay the malvina. The ulrick overpay the adelina. The ulrick is fibrillose. If something is syncarpous then it overpay the dustin. If something roam the dustin then the dustin is syncarpous. If something overpay the dustin then the dustin does not visit the malvina. If something roam the malvina then it is syncarpous. If something is tried and it roam the malvina then it gaze the dustin. If something is syncarpous and it does not chase the adelina then it overpay the ulrick. If something roam the ulrick and it gaze the dustin then it does not like the adelina. If something is syncarpous and it does not like the dustin then it is most. The adelina does not like the malvina.", "logic": "\nnot Diaphysial(dustin)\nRoam(dustin, ulrick)\nRoam(malvina, dustin)\nTried(adelina)\nGaze(adelina, malvina)\nRoam(adelina, dustin)\nRoam(adelina, ulrick)\nOverpay(ulrick, malvina)\nOverpay(ulrick, adelina)\nFibrillose(ulrick)\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) -> Overpay(x, dustin))\nforall x (Roam(x, dustin) -> Syncarpous(dustin))\nforall x (Overpay(x, dustin) -> not Roam(dustin, malvina))\nforall x (Roam(x, malvina) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Tried(x) and Roam(x, malvina) -> Gaze(x, dustin))\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) and not Overpay(x, adelina) -> Overpay(x, ulrick))\nforall x (Roam(x, ulrick) and Gaze(x, dustin) -> not Gaze(x, adelina))\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) and not Gaze(x, dustin) -> Most(x))\n\nnot Gaze(adelina, malvina)\n\ntherefore Gaze(adelina, malvina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The serena is not recessive. The serena rebury the marleen. The nananne rebury the serena. The woodie is incumbent. The woodie bully the nananne. The woodie rebury the serena. The woodie rebury the marleen. The marleen delist the nananne. The marleen delist the woodie. The marleen is unembodied. If something is overawed then it delist the serena. If something rebury the serena then the serena is overawed. If something delist the serena then the serena does not visit the nananne. If something rebury the nananne then it is overawed. If something is incumbent and it rebury the nananne then it bully the serena. If something is overawed and it does not chase the woodie then it delist the marleen. If something rebury the marleen and it bully the serena then it does not like the woodie. If something is overawed and it does not like the serena then it is prisonlike. The serena is overawed.", "logic": "\nnot Recessive(serena)\nRebury(serena, marleen)\nRebury(nananne, serena)\nIncumbent(woodie)\nBully(woodie, nananne)\nRebury(woodie, serena)\nRebury(woodie, marleen)\nDelist(marleen, nananne)\nDelist(marleen, woodie)\nUnembodied(marleen)\nforall x (Overawed(x) -> Delist(x, serena))\nforall x (Rebury(x, serena) -> Overawed(serena))\nforall x (Delist(x, serena) -> not Rebury(serena, nananne))\nforall x (Rebury(x, nananne) -> Overawed(x))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) and Rebury(x, nananne) -> Bully(x, serena))\nforall x (Overawed(x) and not Delist(x, woodie) -> Delist(x, marleen))\nforall x (Rebury(x, marleen) and Bully(x, serena) -> not Bully(x, woodie))\nforall x (Overawed(x) and not Bully(x, serena) -> Prisonlike(x))\n\nOverawed(serena)\n\nRebury(nananne, serena) and forall x (Rebury(x, serena) -> Overawed(serena)) -> therefore Overawed(serena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The camilla is not resupine. The camilla cooccur the fay. The debbie cooccur the camilla. The abbe is uncombable. The abbe vindicate the debbie. The abbe cooccur the camilla. The abbe cooccur the fay. The fay prepose the debbie. The fay prepose the abbe. The fay is isthmian. If something is hortatory then it prepose the camilla. If something cooccur the camilla then the camilla is hortatory. If something prepose the camilla then the camilla does not visit the debbie. If something cooccur the debbie then it is hortatory. If something is uncombable and it cooccur the debbie then it vindicate the camilla. If something is hortatory and it does not chase the abbe then it prepose the fay. If something cooccur the fay and it vindicate the camilla then it does not like the abbe. If something is hortatory and it does not like the camilla then it is inviolate. The camilla is not hortatory.", "logic": "\nnot Resupine(camilla)\nCooccur(camilla, fay)\nCooccur(debbie, camilla)\nUncombable(abbe)\nVindicate(abbe, debbie)\nCooccur(abbe, camilla)\nCooccur(abbe, fay)\nPrepose(fay, debbie)\nPrepose(fay, abbe)\nIsthmian(fay)\nforall x (Hortatory(x) -> Prepose(x, camilla))\nforall x (Cooccur(x, camilla) -> Hortatory(camilla))\nforall x (Prepose(x, camilla) -> not Cooccur(camilla, debbie))\nforall x (Cooccur(x, debbie) -> Hortatory(x))\nforall x (Uncombable(x) and Cooccur(x, debbie) -> Vindicate(x, camilla))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) and not Prepose(x, abbe) -> Prepose(x, fay))\nforall x (Cooccur(x, fay) and Vindicate(x, camilla) -> not Vindicate(x, abbe))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) and not Vindicate(x, camilla) -> Inviolate(x))\n\nnot Hortatory(camilla)\n\nCooccur(debbie, camilla) and forall x (Cooccur(x, camilla) -> Hortatory(camilla)) -> therefore Hortatory(camilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The doloritas is not myriad. The doloritas rethink the jared. The ardene rethink the doloritas. The ruthie is heartening. The ruthie hackle the ardene. The ruthie rethink the doloritas. The ruthie rethink the jared. The jared tint the ardene. The jared tint the ruthie. The jared is engraved. If something is scapular then it tint the doloritas. If something rethink the doloritas then the doloritas is scapular. If something tint the doloritas then the doloritas does not visit the ardene. If something rethink the ardene then it is scapular. If something is heartening and it rethink the ardene then it hackle the doloritas. If something is scapular and it does not chase the ruthie then it tint the jared. If something rethink the jared and it hackle the doloritas then it does not like the ruthie. If something is scapular and it does not like the doloritas then it is nisi. The doloritas tint the doloritas.", "logic": "\nnot Myriad(doloritas)\nRethink(doloritas, jared)\nRethink(ardene, doloritas)\nHeartening(ruthie)\nHackle(ruthie, ardene)\nRethink(ruthie, doloritas)\nRethink(ruthie, jared)\nTint(jared, ardene)\nTint(jared, ruthie)\nEngraved(jared)\nforall x (Scapular(x) -> Tint(x, doloritas))\nforall x (Rethink(x, doloritas) -> Scapular(doloritas))\nforall x (Tint(x, doloritas) -> not Rethink(doloritas, ardene))\nforall x (Rethink(x, ardene) -> Scapular(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) and Rethink(x, ardene) -> Hackle(x, doloritas))\nforall x (Scapular(x) and not Tint(x, ruthie) -> Tint(x, jared))\nforall x (Rethink(x, jared) and Hackle(x, doloritas) -> not Hackle(x, ruthie))\nforall x (Scapular(x) and not Hackle(x, doloritas) -> Nisi(x))\n\nTint(doloritas, doloritas)\n\nRethink(ardene, doloritas) and forall x (Rethink(x, doloritas) -> Scapular(doloritas)) -> therefore Scapular(doloritas) Scapular(doloritas) and forall x (Scapular(x) -> Tint(x, doloritas)) -> therefore Tint(doloritas, doloritas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The blanche is not barricaded. The blanche persuade the tharen. The emelina persuade the blanche. The pattie is basilar. The pattie notate the emelina. The pattie persuade the blanche. The pattie persuade the tharen. The tharen chrome the emelina. The tharen chrome the pattie. The tharen is soaked. If something is rightful then it chrome the blanche. If something persuade the blanche then the blanche is rightful. If something chrome the blanche then the blanche does not visit the emelina. If something persuade the emelina then it is rightful. If something is basilar and it persuade the emelina then it notate the blanche. If something is rightful and it does not chase the pattie then it chrome the tharen. If something persuade the tharen and it notate the blanche then it does not like the pattie. If something is rightful and it does not like the blanche then it is isentropic. The blanche does not chase the blanche.", "logic": "\nnot Barricaded(blanche)\nPersuade(blanche, tharen)\nPersuade(emelina, blanche)\nBasilar(pattie)\nNotate(pattie, emelina)\nPersuade(pattie, blanche)\nPersuade(pattie, tharen)\nChrome(tharen, emelina)\nChrome(tharen, pattie)\nSoaked(tharen)\nforall x (Rightful(x) -> Chrome(x, blanche))\nforall x (Persuade(x, blanche) -> Rightful(blanche))\nforall x (Chrome(x, blanche) -> not Persuade(blanche, emelina))\nforall x (Persuade(x, emelina) -> Rightful(x))\nforall x (Basilar(x) and Persuade(x, emelina) -> Notate(x, blanche))\nforall x (Rightful(x) and not Chrome(x, pattie) -> Chrome(x, tharen))\nforall x (Persuade(x, tharen) and Notate(x, blanche) -> not Notate(x, pattie))\nforall x (Rightful(x) and not Notate(x, blanche) -> Isentropic(x))\n\nnot Chrome(blanche, blanche)\n\nPersuade(emelina, blanche) and forall x (Persuade(x, blanche) -> Rightful(blanche)) -> therefore Rightful(blanche) Rightful(blanche) and forall x (Rightful(x) -> Chrome(x, blanche)) -> therefore Chrome(blanche, blanche)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The maynord is not unsmiling. The maynord digitize the stanford. The jacquetta digitize the maynord. The nolie is inhibitory. The nolie luff the jacquetta. The nolie digitize the maynord. The nolie digitize the stanford. The stanford preclude the jacquetta. The stanford preclude the nolie. The stanford is allowable. If something is fungible then it preclude the maynord. If something digitize the maynord then the maynord is fungible. If something preclude the maynord then the maynord does not visit the jacquetta. If something digitize the jacquetta then it is fungible. If something is inhibitory and it digitize the jacquetta then it luff the maynord. If something is fungible and it does not chase the nolie then it preclude the stanford. If something digitize the stanford and it luff the maynord then it does not like the nolie. If something is fungible and it does not like the maynord then it is overlooked. The maynord does not visit the jacquetta.", "logic": "\nnot Unsmiling(maynord)\nDigitize(maynord, stanford)\nDigitize(jacquetta, maynord)\nInhibitory(nolie)\nLuff(nolie, jacquetta)\nDigitize(nolie, maynord)\nDigitize(nolie, stanford)\nPreclude(stanford, jacquetta)\nPreclude(stanford, nolie)\nAllowable(stanford)\nforall x (Fungible(x) -> Preclude(x, maynord))\nforall x (Digitize(x, maynord) -> Fungible(maynord))\nforall x (Preclude(x, maynord) -> not Digitize(maynord, jacquetta))\nforall x (Digitize(x, jacquetta) -> Fungible(x))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) and Digitize(x, jacquetta) -> Luff(x, maynord))\nforall x (Fungible(x) and not Preclude(x, nolie) -> Preclude(x, stanford))\nforall x (Digitize(x, stanford) and Luff(x, maynord) -> not Luff(x, nolie))\nforall x (Fungible(x) and not Luff(x, maynord) -> Overlooked(x))\n\nnot Digitize(maynord, jacquetta)\n\nDigitize(jacquetta, maynord) and forall x (Digitize(x, maynord) -> Fungible(maynord)) -> therefore Fungible(maynord) Fungible(maynord) and forall x (Fungible(x) -> Preclude(x, maynord)) -> therefore Preclude(maynord, maynord) Preclude(maynord, maynord) and forall x (Preclude(x, maynord) -> not Digitize(maynord, jacquetta)) -> therefore not Digitize(maynord, jacquetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The ashby is not unstudious. The ashby cite the meredith. The daloris cite the ashby. The aldus is daring. The aldus house the daloris. The aldus cite the ashby. The aldus cite the meredith. The meredith underquote the daloris. The meredith underquote the aldus. The meredith is untimbered. If something is tattling then it underquote the ashby. If something cite the ashby then the ashby is tattling. If something underquote the ashby then the ashby does not visit the daloris. If something cite the daloris then it is tattling. If something is daring and it cite the daloris then it house the ashby. If something is tattling and it does not chase the aldus then it underquote the meredith. If something cite the meredith and it house the ashby then it does not like the aldus. If something is tattling and it does not like the ashby then it is retractile. The ashby cite the daloris.", "logic": "\nnot Unstudious(ashby)\nCite(ashby, meredith)\nCite(daloris, ashby)\nDaring(aldus)\nHouse(aldus, daloris)\nCite(aldus, ashby)\nCite(aldus, meredith)\nUnderquote(meredith, daloris)\nUnderquote(meredith, aldus)\nUntimbered(meredith)\nforall x (Tattling(x) -> Underquote(x, ashby))\nforall x (Cite(x, ashby) -> Tattling(ashby))\nforall x (Underquote(x, ashby) -> not Cite(ashby, daloris))\nforall x (Cite(x, daloris) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Daring(x) and Cite(x, daloris) -> House(x, ashby))\nforall x (Tattling(x) and not Underquote(x, aldus) -> Underquote(x, meredith))\nforall x (Cite(x, meredith) and House(x, ashby) -> not House(x, aldus))\nforall x (Tattling(x) and not House(x, ashby) -> Retractile(x))\n\nCite(ashby, daloris)\n\nCite(daloris, ashby) and forall x (Cite(x, ashby) -> Tattling(ashby)) -> therefore Tattling(ashby) Tattling(ashby) and forall x (Tattling(x) -> Underquote(x, ashby)) -> therefore Underquote(ashby, ashby) Underquote(ashby, ashby) and forall x (Underquote(x, ashby) -> not Cite(ashby, daloris)) -> therefore not Cite(ashby, daloris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The bonnie is not strung. The bonnie straw the nevin. The maudie straw the bonnie. The magdalen is insouciant. The magdalen stymy the maudie. The magdalen straw the bonnie. The magdalen straw the nevin. The nevin rubricate the maudie. The nevin rubricate the magdalen. The nevin is tasteless. If something is choked then it rubricate the bonnie. If something straw the bonnie then the bonnie is choked. If something rubricate the bonnie then the bonnie does not visit the maudie. If something straw the maudie then it is choked. If something is insouciant and it straw the maudie then it stymy the bonnie. If something is choked and it does not chase the magdalen then it rubricate the nevin. If something straw the nevin and it stymy the bonnie then it does not like the magdalen. If something is choked and it does not like the bonnie then it is listed. The magdalen does not like the bonnie.", "logic": "\nnot Strung(bonnie)\nStraw(bonnie, nevin)\nStraw(maudie, bonnie)\nInsouciant(magdalen)\nStymy(magdalen, maudie)\nStraw(magdalen, bonnie)\nStraw(magdalen, nevin)\nRubricate(nevin, maudie)\nRubricate(nevin, magdalen)\nTasteless(nevin)\nforall x (Choked(x) -> Rubricate(x, bonnie))\nforall x (Straw(x, bonnie) -> Choked(bonnie))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, bonnie) -> not Straw(bonnie, maudie))\nforall x (Straw(x, maudie) -> Choked(x))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and Straw(x, maudie) -> Stymy(x, bonnie))\nforall x (Choked(x) and not Rubricate(x, magdalen) -> Rubricate(x, nevin))\nforall x (Straw(x, nevin) and Stymy(x, bonnie) -> not Stymy(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Choked(x) and not Stymy(x, bonnie) -> Listed(x))\n\nnot Stymy(magdalen, bonnie)\n\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and Straw(x, maudie) -> Stymy(x, bonnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The jacki is not thoughtful. The jacki cohere the electra. The sybilla cohere the jacki. The rowena is polite. The rowena bedight the sybilla. The rowena cohere the jacki. The rowena cohere the electra. The electra succor the sybilla. The electra succor the rowena. The electra is unwilling. If something is wakeless then it succor the jacki. If something cohere the jacki then the jacki is wakeless. If something succor the jacki then the jacki does not visit the sybilla. If something cohere the sybilla then it is wakeless. If something is polite and it cohere the sybilla then it bedight the jacki. If something is wakeless and it does not chase the rowena then it succor the electra. If something cohere the electra and it bedight the jacki then it does not like the rowena. If something is wakeless and it does not like the jacki then it is husbandly. The sybilla succor the jacki.", "logic": "\nnot Thoughtful(jacki)\nCohere(jacki, electra)\nCohere(sybilla, jacki)\nPolite(rowena)\nBedight(rowena, sybilla)\nCohere(rowena, jacki)\nCohere(rowena, electra)\nSuccor(electra, sybilla)\nSuccor(electra, rowena)\nUnwilling(electra)\nforall x (Wakeless(x) -> Succor(x, jacki))\nforall x (Cohere(x, jacki) -> Wakeless(jacki))\nforall x (Succor(x, jacki) -> not Cohere(jacki, sybilla))\nforall x (Cohere(x, sybilla) -> Wakeless(x))\nforall x (Polite(x) and Cohere(x, sybilla) -> Bedight(x, jacki))\nforall x (Wakeless(x) and not Succor(x, rowena) -> Succor(x, electra))\nforall x (Cohere(x, electra) and Bedight(x, jacki) -> not Bedight(x, rowena))\nforall x (Wakeless(x) and not Bedight(x, jacki) -> Husbandly(x))\n\nSuccor(sybilla, jacki)\n\nforall x (Wakeless(x) -> Succor(x, jacki)) <- forall x (Cohere(x, sybilla) -> Wakeless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The meriel is not napping. The meriel plicate the liane. The armand plicate the meriel. The charo is brief. The charo cocoon the armand. The charo plicate the meriel. The charo plicate the liane. The liane preempt the armand. The liane preempt the charo. The liane is acinic. If something is enjoyable then it preempt the meriel. If something plicate the meriel then the meriel is enjoyable. If something preempt the meriel then the meriel does not visit the armand. If something plicate the armand then it is enjoyable. If something is brief and it plicate the armand then it cocoon the meriel. If something is enjoyable and it does not chase the charo then it preempt the liane. If something plicate the liane and it cocoon the meriel then it does not like the charo. If something is enjoyable and it does not like the meriel then it is abyssal. The meriel is not abyssal.", "logic": "\nnot Napping(meriel)\nPlicate(meriel, liane)\nPlicate(armand, meriel)\nBrief(charo)\nCocoon(charo, armand)\nPlicate(charo, meriel)\nPlicate(charo, liane)\nPreempt(liane, armand)\nPreempt(liane, charo)\nAcinic(liane)\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) -> Preempt(x, meriel))\nforall x (Plicate(x, meriel) -> Enjoyable(meriel))\nforall x (Preempt(x, meriel) -> not Plicate(meriel, armand))\nforall x (Plicate(x, armand) -> Enjoyable(x))\nforall x (Brief(x) and Plicate(x, armand) -> Cocoon(x, meriel))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) and not Preempt(x, charo) -> Preempt(x, liane))\nforall x (Plicate(x, liane) and Cocoon(x, meriel) -> not Cocoon(x, charo))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) and not Cocoon(x, meriel) -> Abyssal(x))\n\nnot Abyssal(meriel)\n\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) and not Cocoon(x, meriel) -> Abyssal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The sybyl is not outfitted. The sybyl feel the bidget. The caitlin feel the sybyl. The lettie is billiard. The lettie whirlpool the caitlin. The lettie feel the sybyl. The lettie feel the bidget. The bidget clapboard the caitlin. The bidget clapboard the lettie. The bidget is endemical. If something is squirting then it clapboard the sybyl. If something feel the sybyl then the sybyl is squirting. If something clapboard the sybyl then the sybyl does not visit the caitlin. If something feel the caitlin then it is squirting. If something is billiard and it feel the caitlin then it whirlpool the sybyl. If something is squirting and it does not chase the lettie then it clapboard the bidget. If something feel the bidget and it whirlpool the sybyl then it does not like the lettie. If something is squirting and it does not like the sybyl then it is ascendent. The bidget is squirting.", "logic": "\nnot Outfitted(sybyl)\nFeel(sybyl, bidget)\nFeel(caitlin, sybyl)\nBilliard(lettie)\nWhirlpool(lettie, caitlin)\nFeel(lettie, sybyl)\nFeel(lettie, bidget)\nClapboard(bidget, caitlin)\nClapboard(bidget, lettie)\nEndemical(bidget)\nforall x (Squirting(x) -> Clapboard(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Feel(x, sybyl) -> Squirting(sybyl))\nforall x (Clapboard(x, sybyl) -> not Feel(sybyl, caitlin))\nforall x (Feel(x, caitlin) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Billiard(x) and Feel(x, caitlin) -> Whirlpool(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Squirting(x) and not Clapboard(x, lettie) -> Clapboard(x, bidget))\nforall x (Feel(x, bidget) and Whirlpool(x, sybyl) -> not Whirlpool(x, lettie))\nforall x (Squirting(x) and not Whirlpool(x, sybyl) -> Ascendent(x))\n\nSquirting(bidget)\n\nforall x (Feel(x, caitlin) -> Squirting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The mort is not watered. The mort move the olivette. The jillie move the mort. The marylynne is speaking. The marylynne span the jillie. The marylynne move the mort. The marylynne move the olivette. The olivette indicate the jillie. The olivette indicate the marylynne. The olivette is blabby. If something is bicipital then it indicate the mort. If something move the mort then the mort is bicipital. If something indicate the mort then the mort does not visit the jillie. If something move the jillie then it is bicipital. If something is speaking and it move the jillie then it span the mort. If something is bicipital and it does not chase the marylynne then it indicate the olivette. If something move the olivette and it span the mort then it does not like the marylynne. If something is bicipital and it does not like the mort then it is abreast. The jillie does not like the olivette.", "logic": "\nnot Watered(mort)\nMove(mort, olivette)\nMove(jillie, mort)\nSpeaking(marylynne)\nSpan(marylynne, jillie)\nMove(marylynne, mort)\nMove(marylynne, olivette)\nIndicate(olivette, jillie)\nIndicate(olivette, marylynne)\nBlabby(olivette)\nforall x (Bicipital(x) -> Indicate(x, mort))\nforall x (Move(x, mort) -> Bicipital(mort))\nforall x (Indicate(x, mort) -> not Move(mort, jillie))\nforall x (Move(x, jillie) -> Bicipital(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) and Move(x, jillie) -> Span(x, mort))\nforall x (Bicipital(x) and not Indicate(x, marylynne) -> Indicate(x, olivette))\nforall x (Move(x, olivette) and Span(x, mort) -> not Span(x, marylynne))\nforall x (Bicipital(x) and not Span(x, mort) -> Abreast(x))\n\nnot Span(jillie, olivette)\n\nnot Span(jillie, olivette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The nicky is not nonuple. The nicky swathe the roseanne. The elka swathe the nicky. The desiri is carthusian. The desiri secrete the elka. The desiri swathe the nicky. The desiri swathe the roseanne. The roseanne talc the elka. The roseanne talc the desiri. The roseanne is phreatic. If something is cracked then it talc the nicky. If something swathe the nicky then the nicky is cracked. If something talc the nicky then the nicky does not visit the elka. If something swathe the elka then it is cracked. If something is carthusian and it swathe the elka then it secrete the nicky. If something is cracked and it does not chase the desiri then it talc the roseanne. If something swathe the roseanne and it secrete the nicky then it does not like the desiri. If something is cracked and it does not like the nicky then it is nonelected. The elka swathe the roseanne.", "logic": "\nnot Nonuple(nicky)\nSwathe(nicky, roseanne)\nSwathe(elka, nicky)\nCarthusian(desiri)\nSecrete(desiri, elka)\nSwathe(desiri, nicky)\nSwathe(desiri, roseanne)\nTalc(roseanne, elka)\nTalc(roseanne, desiri)\nPhreatic(roseanne)\nforall x (Cracked(x) -> Talc(x, nicky))\nforall x (Swathe(x, nicky) -> Cracked(nicky))\nforall x (Talc(x, nicky) -> not Swathe(nicky, elka))\nforall x (Swathe(x, elka) -> Cracked(x))\nforall x (Carthusian(x) and Swathe(x, elka) -> Secrete(x, nicky))\nforall x (Cracked(x) and not Talc(x, desiri) -> Talc(x, roseanne))\nforall x (Swathe(x, roseanne) and Secrete(x, nicky) -> not Secrete(x, desiri))\nforall x (Cracked(x) and not Secrete(x, nicky) -> Nonelected(x))\n\nSwathe(elka, roseanne)\n\nSwathe(elka, roseanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The halley is not platyrhine. The halley stalemate the alexa. The gordie stalemate the halley. The elle is offish. The elle chime the gordie. The elle stalemate the halley. The elle stalemate the alexa. The alexa decree the gordie. The alexa decree the elle. The alexa is aurous. If something is acyclic then it decree the halley. If something stalemate the halley then the halley is acyclic. If something decree the halley then the halley does not visit the gordie. If something stalemate the gordie then it is acyclic. If something is offish and it stalemate the gordie then it chime the halley. If something is acyclic and it does not chase the elle then it decree the alexa. If something stalemate the alexa and it chime the halley then it does not like the elle. If something is acyclic and it does not like the halley then it is insightful. The halley does not visit the halley.", "logic": "\nnot Platyrhine(halley)\nStalemate(halley, alexa)\nStalemate(gordie, halley)\nOffish(elle)\nChime(elle, gordie)\nStalemate(elle, halley)\nStalemate(elle, alexa)\nDecree(alexa, gordie)\nDecree(alexa, elle)\nAurous(alexa)\nforall x (Acyclic(x) -> Decree(x, halley))\nforall x (Stalemate(x, halley) -> Acyclic(halley))\nforall x (Decree(x, halley) -> not Stalemate(halley, gordie))\nforall x (Stalemate(x, gordie) -> Acyclic(x))\nforall x (Offish(x) and Stalemate(x, gordie) -> Chime(x, halley))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) and not Decree(x, elle) -> Decree(x, alexa))\nforall x (Stalemate(x, alexa) and Chime(x, halley) -> not Chime(x, elle))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) and not Chime(x, halley) -> Insightful(x))\n\nnot Stalemate(halley, halley)\n\nnot Stalemate(halley, halley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The nanon is not loose. The nanon clink the henriette. The missy clink the nanon. The reeva is packaged. The reeva wander the missy. The reeva clink the nanon. The reeva clink the henriette. The henriette symbolize the missy. The henriette symbolize the reeva. The henriette is amebic. If something is riled then it symbolize the nanon. If something clink the nanon then the nanon is riled. If something symbolize the nanon then the nanon does not visit the missy. If something clink the missy then it is riled. If something is packaged and it clink the missy then it wander the nanon. If something is riled and it does not chase the reeva then it symbolize the henriette. If something clink the henriette and it wander the nanon then it does not like the reeva. If something is riled and it does not like the nanon then it is protrusive. The missy symbolize the missy.", "logic": "\nnot Loose(nanon)\nClink(nanon, henriette)\nClink(missy, nanon)\nPackaged(reeva)\nWander(reeva, missy)\nClink(reeva, nanon)\nClink(reeva, henriette)\nSymbolize(henriette, missy)\nSymbolize(henriette, reeva)\nAmebic(henriette)\nforall x (Riled(x) -> Symbolize(x, nanon))\nforall x (Clink(x, nanon) -> Riled(nanon))\nforall x (Symbolize(x, nanon) -> not Clink(nanon, missy))\nforall x (Clink(x, missy) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Packaged(x) and Clink(x, missy) -> Wander(x, nanon))\nforall x (Riled(x) and not Symbolize(x, reeva) -> Symbolize(x, henriette))\nforall x (Clink(x, henriette) and Wander(x, nanon) -> not Wander(x, reeva))\nforall x (Riled(x) and not Wander(x, nanon) -> Protrusive(x))\n\nSymbolize(missy, missy)\n\nSymbolize(missy, missy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The hatty does not see the charmaine. The hatty does not see the kory. The hatty cable the patti. The charmaine ammonify the patti. The charmaine cable the kory. The patti is studious. The patti is unequal. The patti misstate the kory. The patti cable the hatty. The patti cable the charmaine. The kory is unequal. The kory misstate the hatty. The kory ammonify the hatty. The kory ammonify the charmaine. The kory cable the patti. If something is copacetic then it does not like the hatty. If something misstate the kory and it ammonify the hatty then it is copacetic. If something misstate the kory and the kory cable the patti then it ammonify the hatty. The charmaine cable the kory.", "logic": "\nnot Ammonify(hatty, charmaine)\nnot Ammonify(hatty, kory)\nCable(hatty, patti)\nAmmonify(charmaine, patti)\nCable(charmaine, kory)\nStudious(patti)\nUnequal(patti)\nMisstate(patti, kory)\nCable(patti, hatty)\nCable(patti, charmaine)\nUnequal(kory)\nMisstate(kory, hatty)\nAmmonify(kory, hatty)\nAmmonify(kory, charmaine)\nCable(kory, patti)\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> not Misstate(x, hatty))\nforall x (Misstate(x, kory) and Ammonify(x, hatty) -> Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Misstate(x, kory) and Cable(kory, patti) -> Ammonify(x, hatty))\n\nCable(charmaine, kory)\n\ntherefore Cable(charmaine, kory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The sashenka does not see the elka. The sashenka does not see the etienne. The sashenka people the terza. The elka plant the terza. The elka people the etienne. The terza is bookish. The terza is tense. The terza generate the etienne. The terza people the sashenka. The terza people the elka. The etienne is tense. The etienne generate the sashenka. The etienne plant the sashenka. The etienne plant the elka. The etienne people the terza. If something is raspy then it does not like the sashenka. If something generate the etienne and it plant the sashenka then it is raspy. If something generate the etienne and the etienne people the terza then it plant the sashenka. The etienne is not tense.", "logic": "\nnot Plant(sashenka, elka)\nnot Plant(sashenka, etienne)\nPeople(sashenka, terza)\nPlant(elka, terza)\nPeople(elka, etienne)\nBookish(terza)\nTense(terza)\nGenerate(terza, etienne)\nPeople(terza, sashenka)\nPeople(terza, elka)\nTense(etienne)\nGenerate(etienne, sashenka)\nPlant(etienne, sashenka)\nPlant(etienne, elka)\nPeople(etienne, terza)\nforall x (Raspy(x) -> not Generate(x, sashenka))\nforall x (Generate(x, etienne) and Plant(x, sashenka) -> Raspy(x))\nforall x (Generate(x, etienne) and People(etienne, terza) -> Plant(x, sashenka))\n\nnot Tense(etienne)\n\ntherefore Tense(etienne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The morly does not see the leontine. The morly does not see the iago. The morly serrate the bryna. The leontine amble the bryna. The leontine serrate the iago. The bryna is canned. The bryna is unpictured. The bryna metal the iago. The bryna serrate the morly. The bryna serrate the leontine. The iago is unpictured. The iago metal the morly. The iago amble the morly. The iago amble the leontine. The iago serrate the bryna. If something is neritic then it does not like the morly. If something metal the iago and it amble the morly then it is neritic. If something metal the iago and the iago serrate the bryna then it amble the morly. The bryna amble the morly.", "logic": "\nnot Amble(morly, leontine)\nnot Amble(morly, iago)\nSerrate(morly, bryna)\nAmble(leontine, bryna)\nSerrate(leontine, iago)\nCanned(bryna)\nUnpictured(bryna)\nMetal(bryna, iago)\nSerrate(bryna, morly)\nSerrate(bryna, leontine)\nUnpictured(iago)\nMetal(iago, morly)\nAmble(iago, morly)\nAmble(iago, leontine)\nSerrate(iago, bryna)\nforall x (Neritic(x) -> not Metal(x, morly))\nforall x (Metal(x, iago) and Amble(x, morly) -> Neritic(x))\nforall x (Metal(x, iago) and Serrate(iago, bryna) -> Amble(x, morly))\n\nAmble(bryna, morly)\n\nMetal(bryna, iago) and Serrate(iago, bryna) and forall x (Metal(x, iago) and Serrate(iago, bryna) -> Amble(x, morly)) -> therefore Amble(bryna, morly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The yale does not see the laila. The yale does not see the tony. The yale book the danica. The laila reword the danica. The laila book the tony. The danica is perceived. The danica is xliv. The danica vandalize the tony. The danica book the yale. The danica book the laila. The tony is xliv. The tony vandalize the yale. The tony reword the yale. The tony reword the laila. The tony book the danica. If something is garmented then it does not like the yale. If something vandalize the tony and it reword the yale then it is garmented. If something vandalize the tony and the tony book the danica then it reword the yale. The danica does not see the yale.", "logic": "\nnot Reword(yale, laila)\nnot Reword(yale, tony)\nBook(yale, danica)\nReword(laila, danica)\nBook(laila, tony)\nPerceived(danica)\nXliv(danica)\nVandalize(danica, tony)\nBook(danica, yale)\nBook(danica, laila)\nXliv(tony)\nVandalize(tony, yale)\nReword(tony, yale)\nReword(tony, laila)\nBook(tony, danica)\nforall x (Garmented(x) -> not Vandalize(x, yale))\nforall x (Vandalize(x, tony) and Reword(x, yale) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Vandalize(x, tony) and Book(tony, danica) -> Reword(x, yale))\n\nnot Reword(danica, yale)\n\nVandalize(danica, tony) and Book(tony, danica) and forall x (Vandalize(x, tony) and Book(tony, danica) -> Reword(x, yale)) -> therefore Reword(danica, yale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The paloma does not see the tomasine. The paloma does not see the dirk. The paloma holystone the penny. The tomasine oppress the penny. The tomasine holystone the dirk. The penny is arcadian. The penny is epilithic. The penny cotton the dirk. The penny holystone the paloma. The penny holystone the tomasine. The dirk is epilithic. The dirk cotton the paloma. The dirk oppress the paloma. The dirk oppress the tomasine. The dirk holystone the penny. If something is stately then it does not like the paloma. If something cotton the dirk and it oppress the paloma then it is stately. If something cotton the dirk and the dirk holystone the penny then it oppress the paloma. The penny is stately.", "logic": "\nnot Oppress(paloma, tomasine)\nnot Oppress(paloma, dirk)\nHolystone(paloma, penny)\nOppress(tomasine, penny)\nHolystone(tomasine, dirk)\nArcadian(penny)\nEpilithic(penny)\nCotton(penny, dirk)\nHolystone(penny, paloma)\nHolystone(penny, tomasine)\nEpilithic(dirk)\nCotton(dirk, paloma)\nOppress(dirk, paloma)\nOppress(dirk, tomasine)\nHolystone(dirk, penny)\nforall x (Stately(x) -> not Cotton(x, paloma))\nforall x (Cotton(x, dirk) and Oppress(x, paloma) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Cotton(x, dirk) and Holystone(dirk, penny) -> Oppress(x, paloma))\n\nStately(penny)\n\nCotton(penny, dirk) and Holystone(dirk, penny) and forall x (Cotton(x, dirk) and Holystone(dirk, penny) -> Oppress(x, paloma)) -> therefore Oppress(penny, paloma) Cotton(penny, dirk) and Oppress(penny, paloma) and forall x (Cotton(x, dirk) and Oppress(x, paloma) -> Stately(x)) -> therefore Stately(penny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The kelly does not see the angelique. The kelly does not see the zelda. The kelly still the praneetf. The angelique pretend the praneetf. The angelique still the zelda. The praneetf is immunized. The praneetf is lxxviii. The praneetf sear the zelda. The praneetf still the kelly. The praneetf still the angelique. The zelda is lxxviii. The zelda sear the kelly. The zelda pretend the kelly. The zelda pretend the angelique. The zelda still the praneetf. If something is insolvent then it does not like the kelly. If something sear the zelda and it pretend the kelly then it is insolvent. If something sear the zelda and the zelda still the praneetf then it pretend the kelly. The praneetf is not insolvent.", "logic": "\nnot Pretend(kelly, angelique)\nnot Pretend(kelly, zelda)\nStill(kelly, praneetf)\nPretend(angelique, praneetf)\nStill(angelique, zelda)\nImmunized(praneetf)\nLxxviii(praneetf)\nSear(praneetf, zelda)\nStill(praneetf, kelly)\nStill(praneetf, angelique)\nLxxviii(zelda)\nSear(zelda, kelly)\nPretend(zelda, kelly)\nPretend(zelda, angelique)\nStill(zelda, praneetf)\nforall x (Insolvent(x) -> not Sear(x, kelly))\nforall x (Sear(x, zelda) and Pretend(x, kelly) -> Insolvent(x))\nforall x (Sear(x, zelda) and Still(zelda, praneetf) -> Pretend(x, kelly))\n\nnot Insolvent(praneetf)\n\nSear(praneetf, zelda) and Still(zelda, praneetf) and forall x (Sear(x, zelda) and Still(zelda, praneetf) -> Pretend(x, kelly)) -> therefore Pretend(praneetf, kelly) Sear(praneetf, zelda) and Pretend(praneetf, kelly) and forall x (Sear(x, zelda) and Pretend(x, kelly) -> Insolvent(x)) -> therefore Insolvent(praneetf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The anabella does not see the storm. The anabella does not see the bonita. The anabella waste the hezekiah. The storm transit the hezekiah. The storm waste the bonita. The hezekiah is ireful. The hezekiah is nonverbal. The hezekiah liken the bonita. The hezekiah waste the anabella. The hezekiah waste the storm. The bonita is nonverbal. The bonita liken the anabella. The bonita transit the anabella. The bonita transit the storm. The bonita waste the hezekiah. If something is towering then it does not like the anabella. If something liken the bonita and it transit the anabella then it is towering. If something liken the bonita and the bonita waste the hezekiah then it transit the anabella. The hezekiah does not like the anabella.", "logic": "\nnot Transit(anabella, storm)\nnot Transit(anabella, bonita)\nWaste(anabella, hezekiah)\nTransit(storm, hezekiah)\nWaste(storm, bonita)\nIreful(hezekiah)\nNonverbal(hezekiah)\nLiken(hezekiah, bonita)\nWaste(hezekiah, anabella)\nWaste(hezekiah, storm)\nNonverbal(bonita)\nLiken(bonita, anabella)\nTransit(bonita, anabella)\nTransit(bonita, storm)\nWaste(bonita, hezekiah)\nforall x (Towering(x) -> not Liken(x, anabella))\nforall x (Liken(x, bonita) and Transit(x, anabella) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Liken(x, bonita) and Waste(bonita, hezekiah) -> Transit(x, anabella))\n\nnot Liken(hezekiah, anabella)\n\nLiken(hezekiah, bonita) and Waste(bonita, hezekiah) and forall x (Liken(x, bonita) and Waste(bonita, hezekiah) -> Transit(x, anabella)) -> therefore Transit(hezekiah, anabella) Liken(hezekiah, bonita) and Transit(hezekiah, anabella) and forall x (Liken(x, bonita) and Transit(x, anabella) -> Towering(x)) -> therefore Towering(hezekiah) Towering(hezekiah) and forall x (Towering(x) -> not Liken(x, anabella)) -> therefore not Liken(hezekiah, anabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The bucky does not see the sheeree. The bucky does not see the arlinda. The bucky portray the erek. The sheeree vegetate the erek. The sheeree portray the arlinda. The erek is semiannual. The erek is forgotten. The erek exenterate the arlinda. The erek portray the bucky. The erek portray the sheeree. The arlinda is forgotten. The arlinda exenterate the bucky. The arlinda vegetate the bucky. The arlinda vegetate the sheeree. The arlinda portray the erek. If something is hilly then it does not like the bucky. If something exenterate the arlinda and it vegetate the bucky then it is hilly. If something exenterate the arlinda and the arlinda portray the erek then it vegetate the bucky. The erek exenterate the bucky.", "logic": "\nnot Vegetate(bucky, sheeree)\nnot Vegetate(bucky, arlinda)\nPortray(bucky, erek)\nVegetate(sheeree, erek)\nPortray(sheeree, arlinda)\nSemiannual(erek)\nForgotten(erek)\nExenterate(erek, arlinda)\nPortray(erek, bucky)\nPortray(erek, sheeree)\nForgotten(arlinda)\nExenterate(arlinda, bucky)\nVegetate(arlinda, bucky)\nVegetate(arlinda, sheeree)\nPortray(arlinda, erek)\nforall x (Hilly(x) -> not Exenterate(x, bucky))\nforall x (Exenterate(x, arlinda) and Vegetate(x, bucky) -> Hilly(x))\nforall x (Exenterate(x, arlinda) and Portray(arlinda, erek) -> Vegetate(x, bucky))\n\nExenterate(erek, bucky)\n\nExenterate(erek, arlinda) and Portray(arlinda, erek) and forall x (Exenterate(x, arlinda) and Portray(arlinda, erek) -> Vegetate(x, bucky)) -> therefore Vegetate(erek, bucky) Exenterate(erek, arlinda) and Vegetate(erek, bucky) and forall x (Exenterate(x, arlinda) and Vegetate(x, bucky) -> Hilly(x)) -> therefore Hilly(erek) Hilly(erek) and forall x (Hilly(x) -> not Exenterate(x, bucky)) -> therefore not Exenterate(erek, bucky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The forrest does not see the laverne. The forrest does not see the alex. The forrest fissure the gasper. The laverne senesce the gasper. The laverne fissure the alex. The gasper is sceptical. The gasper is hemal. The gasper gazette the alex. The gasper fissure the forrest. The gasper fissure the laverne. The alex is hemal. The alex gazette the forrest. The alex senesce the forrest. The alex senesce the laverne. The alex fissure the gasper. If something is echoless then it does not like the forrest. If something gazette the alex and it senesce the forrest then it is echoless. If something gazette the alex and the alex fissure the gasper then it senesce the forrest. The forrest is not echoless.", "logic": "\nnot Senesce(forrest, laverne)\nnot Senesce(forrest, alex)\nFissure(forrest, gasper)\nSenesce(laverne, gasper)\nFissure(laverne, alex)\nSceptical(gasper)\nHemal(gasper)\nGazette(gasper, alex)\nFissure(gasper, forrest)\nFissure(gasper, laverne)\nHemal(alex)\nGazette(alex, forrest)\nSenesce(alex, forrest)\nSenesce(alex, laverne)\nFissure(alex, gasper)\nforall x (Echoless(x) -> not Gazette(x, forrest))\nforall x (Gazette(x, alex) and Senesce(x, forrest) -> Echoless(x))\nforall x (Gazette(x, alex) and Fissure(alex, gasper) -> Senesce(x, forrest))\n\nnot Echoless(forrest)\n\nforall x (Gazette(x, alex) and Senesce(x, forrest) -> Echoless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The archy does not see the devondra. The archy does not see the menard. The archy joggle the cal. The devondra peep the cal. The devondra joggle the menard. The cal is favored. The cal is irksome. The cal exuberate the menard. The cal joggle the archy. The cal joggle the devondra. The menard is irksome. The menard exuberate the archy. The menard peep the archy. The menard peep the devondra. The menard joggle the cal. If something is clinical then it does not like the archy. If something exuberate the menard and it peep the archy then it is clinical. If something exuberate the menard and the menard joggle the cal then it peep the archy. The devondra peep the archy.", "logic": "\nnot Peep(archy, devondra)\nnot Peep(archy, menard)\nJoggle(archy, cal)\nPeep(devondra, cal)\nJoggle(devondra, menard)\nFavored(cal)\nIrksome(cal)\nExuberate(cal, menard)\nJoggle(cal, archy)\nJoggle(cal, devondra)\nIrksome(menard)\nExuberate(menard, archy)\nPeep(menard, archy)\nPeep(menard, devondra)\nJoggle(menard, cal)\nforall x (Clinical(x) -> not Exuberate(x, archy))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, menard) and Peep(x, archy) -> Clinical(x))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, menard) and Joggle(menard, cal) -> Peep(x, archy))\n\nPeep(devondra, archy)\n\nforall x (Exuberate(x, menard) and Joggle(menard, cal) -> Peep(x, archy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The roscoe does not see the annalise. The roscoe does not see the della. The roscoe retell the witty. The annalise trowel the witty. The annalise retell the della. The witty is plundering. The witty is thenal. The witty hash the della. The witty retell the roscoe. The witty retell the annalise. The della is thenal. The della hash the roscoe. The della trowel the roscoe. The della trowel the annalise. The della retell the witty. If something is blastemal then it does not like the roscoe. If something hash the della and it trowel the roscoe then it is blastemal. If something hash the della and the della retell the witty then it trowel the roscoe. The annalise is not blastemal.", "logic": "\nnot Trowel(roscoe, annalise)\nnot Trowel(roscoe, della)\nRetell(roscoe, witty)\nTrowel(annalise, witty)\nRetell(annalise, della)\nPlundering(witty)\nThenal(witty)\nHash(witty, della)\nRetell(witty, roscoe)\nRetell(witty, annalise)\nThenal(della)\nHash(della, roscoe)\nTrowel(della, roscoe)\nTrowel(della, annalise)\nRetell(della, witty)\nforall x (Blastemal(x) -> not Hash(x, roscoe))\nforall x (Hash(x, della) and Trowel(x, roscoe) -> Blastemal(x))\nforall x (Hash(x, della) and Retell(della, witty) -> Trowel(x, roscoe))\n\nnot Blastemal(annalise)\n\nforall x (Hash(x, della) and Trowel(x, roscoe) -> Blastemal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The robbert does not see the clemens. The robbert does not see the montague. The robbert ritualize the ruthe. The clemens bank the ruthe. The clemens ritualize the montague. The ruthe is dietetical. The ruthe is greenhouse. The ruthe desalinize the montague. The ruthe ritualize the robbert. The ruthe ritualize the clemens. The montague is greenhouse. The montague desalinize the robbert. The montague bank the robbert. The montague bank the clemens. The montague ritualize the ruthe. If something is biotypic then it does not like the robbert. If something desalinize the montague and it bank the robbert then it is biotypic. If something desalinize the montague and the montague ritualize the ruthe then it bank the robbert. The robbert bank the robbert.", "logic": "\nnot Bank(robbert, clemens)\nnot Bank(robbert, montague)\nRitualize(robbert, ruthe)\nBank(clemens, ruthe)\nRitualize(clemens, montague)\nDietetical(ruthe)\nGreenhouse(ruthe)\nDesalinize(ruthe, montague)\nRitualize(ruthe, robbert)\nRitualize(ruthe, clemens)\nGreenhouse(montague)\nDesalinize(montague, robbert)\nBank(montague, robbert)\nBank(montague, clemens)\nRitualize(montague, ruthe)\nforall x (Biotypic(x) -> not Desalinize(x, robbert))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, montague) and Bank(x, robbert) -> Biotypic(x))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, montague) and Ritualize(montague, ruthe) -> Bank(x, robbert))\n\nBank(robbert, robbert)\n\nforall x (Desalinize(x, montague) and Ritualize(montague, ruthe) -> Bank(x, robbert)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The bertine does not see the karita. The bertine does not see the lew. The bertine inter the merline. The karita solace the merline. The karita inter the lew. The merline is freehand. The merline is gammy. The merline question the lew. The merline inter the bertine. The merline inter the karita. The lew is gammy. The lew question the bertine. The lew solace the bertine. The lew solace the karita. The lew inter the merline. If something is woody then it does not like the bertine. If something question the lew and it solace the bertine then it is woody. If something question the lew and the lew inter the merline then it solace the bertine. The karita does not see the karita.", "logic": "\nnot Solace(bertine, karita)\nnot Solace(bertine, lew)\nInter(bertine, merline)\nSolace(karita, merline)\nInter(karita, lew)\nFreehand(merline)\nGammy(merline)\nQuestion(merline, lew)\nInter(merline, bertine)\nInter(merline, karita)\nGammy(lew)\nQuestion(lew, bertine)\nSolace(lew, bertine)\nSolace(lew, karita)\nInter(lew, merline)\nforall x (Woody(x) -> not Question(x, bertine))\nforall x (Question(x, lew) and Solace(x, bertine) -> Woody(x))\nforall x (Question(x, lew) and Inter(lew, merline) -> Solace(x, bertine))\n\nnot Solace(karita, karita)\n\nnot Solace(karita, karita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The myles does not see the nelson. The myles does not see the maggie. The myles revive the sayre. The nelson uniform the sayre. The nelson revive the maggie. The sayre is opencut. The sayre is rosaceous. The sayre dehumanise the maggie. The sayre revive the myles. The sayre revive the nelson. The maggie is rosaceous. The maggie dehumanise the myles. The maggie uniform the myles. The maggie uniform the nelson. The maggie revive the sayre. If something is diagonal then it does not like the myles. If something dehumanise the maggie and it uniform the myles then it is diagonal. If something dehumanise the maggie and the maggie revive the sayre then it uniform the myles. The nelson is opencut.", "logic": "\nnot Uniform(myles, nelson)\nnot Uniform(myles, maggie)\nRevive(myles, sayre)\nUniform(nelson, sayre)\nRevive(nelson, maggie)\nOpencut(sayre)\nRosaceous(sayre)\nDehumanise(sayre, maggie)\nRevive(sayre, myles)\nRevive(sayre, nelson)\nRosaceous(maggie)\nDehumanise(maggie, myles)\nUniform(maggie, myles)\nUniform(maggie, nelson)\nRevive(maggie, sayre)\nforall x (Diagonal(x) -> not Dehumanise(x, myles))\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, maggie) and Uniform(x, myles) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, maggie) and Revive(maggie, sayre) -> Uniform(x, myles))\n\nOpencut(nelson)\n\nOpencut(nelson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The tiphany does not see the oswald. The tiphany does not see the martynne. The tiphany premise the helaina. The oswald transfix the helaina. The oswald premise the martynne. The helaina is fungoid. The helaina is mislabeled. The helaina brattle the martynne. The helaina premise the tiphany. The helaina premise the oswald. The martynne is mislabeled. The martynne brattle the tiphany. The martynne transfix the tiphany. The martynne transfix the oswald. The martynne premise the helaina. If something is living then it does not like the tiphany. If something brattle the martynne and it transfix the tiphany then it is living. If something brattle the martynne and the martynne premise the helaina then it transfix the tiphany. The martynne does not see the helaina.", "logic": "\nnot Transfix(tiphany, oswald)\nnot Transfix(tiphany, martynne)\nPremise(tiphany, helaina)\nTransfix(oswald, helaina)\nPremise(oswald, martynne)\nFungoid(helaina)\nMislabeled(helaina)\nBrattle(helaina, martynne)\nPremise(helaina, tiphany)\nPremise(helaina, oswald)\nMislabeled(martynne)\nBrattle(martynne, tiphany)\nTransfix(martynne, tiphany)\nTransfix(martynne, oswald)\nPremise(martynne, helaina)\nforall x (Living(x) -> not Brattle(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Brattle(x, martynne) and Transfix(x, tiphany) -> Living(x))\nforall x (Brattle(x, martynne) and Premise(martynne, helaina) -> Transfix(x, tiphany))\n\nnot Transfix(martynne, helaina)\n\nnot Transfix(martynne, helaina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The jeanine does not see the pauly. The jeanine does not see the norwood. The jeanine placate the valaree. The pauly submit the valaree. The pauly placate the norwood. The valaree is outlaw. The valaree is mannerly. The valaree concede the norwood. The valaree placate the jeanine. The valaree placate the pauly. The norwood is mannerly. The norwood concede the jeanine. The norwood submit the jeanine. The norwood submit the pauly. The norwood placate the valaree. If something is unable then it does not like the jeanine. If something concede the norwood and it submit the jeanine then it is unable. If something concede the norwood and the norwood placate the valaree then it submit the jeanine. The valaree concede the pauly.", "logic": "\nnot Submit(jeanine, pauly)\nnot Submit(jeanine, norwood)\nPlacate(jeanine, valaree)\nSubmit(pauly, valaree)\nPlacate(pauly, norwood)\nOutlaw(valaree)\nMannerly(valaree)\nConcede(valaree, norwood)\nPlacate(valaree, jeanine)\nPlacate(valaree, pauly)\nMannerly(norwood)\nConcede(norwood, jeanine)\nSubmit(norwood, jeanine)\nSubmit(norwood, pauly)\nPlacate(norwood, valaree)\nforall x (Unable(x) -> not Concede(x, jeanine))\nforall x (Concede(x, norwood) and Submit(x, jeanine) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Concede(x, norwood) and Placate(norwood, valaree) -> Submit(x, jeanine))\n\nConcede(valaree, pauly)\n\nConcede(valaree, pauly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The mellisa is untapped. All untapped people are smashed. If the mellisa is packable and the mellisa is unceasing then the mellisa is untapped. If someone is unceasing then they are formulary. If someone is packable and unceasing then they are formulary. If someone is smashed then they are formulary. All formulary, packable people are untapped. If the mellisa is unceasing and the mellisa is untapped then the mellisa is not formulary. Rough, formulary people are not unceasing. The mellisa is untapped.", "logic": "\nUntapped(mellisa)\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> Smashed(x))\nPackable(mellisa) and Unceasing(mellisa) -> Untapped(mellisa)\nforall x (Unceasing(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Packable(x) and Unceasing(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Smashed(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Formulary(x) and Packable(x) -> Untapped(x))\nUnceasing(mellisa) and Untapped(mellisa) -> not Formulary(mellisa)\nforall x (Smashed(x) and Formulary(x) -> not Unceasing(x))\n\nUntapped(mellisa)\n\ntherefore Untapped(mellisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The flory is acerb. All acerb people are faceted. If the flory is humane and the flory is diverging then the flory is acerb. If someone is diverging then they are affected. If someone is humane and diverging then they are affected. If someone is faceted then they are affected. All affected, humane people are acerb. If the flory is diverging and the flory is acerb then the flory is not affected. Rough, affected people are not diverging. The flory is not acerb.", "logic": "\nAcerb(flory)\nforall x (Acerb(x) -> Faceted(x))\nHumane(flory) and Diverging(flory) -> Acerb(flory)\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Affected(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) and Diverging(x) -> Affected(x))\nforall x (Faceted(x) -> Affected(x))\nforall x (Affected(x) and Humane(x) -> Acerb(x))\nDiverging(flory) and Acerb(flory) -> not Affected(flory)\nforall x (Faceted(x) and Affected(x) -> not Diverging(x))\n\nnot Acerb(flory)\n\ntherefore Acerb(flory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The freddie is setose. All setose people are taciturn. If the freddie is sluicing and the freddie is ebony then the freddie is setose. If someone is ebony then they are pronominal. If someone is sluicing and ebony then they are pronominal. If someone is taciturn then they are pronominal. All pronominal, sluicing people are setose. If the freddie is ebony and the freddie is setose then the freddie is not pronominal. Rough, pronominal people are not ebony. The freddie is taciturn.", "logic": "\nSetose(freddie)\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Taciturn(x))\nSluicing(freddie) and Ebony(freddie) -> Setose(freddie)\nforall x (Ebony(x) -> Pronominal(x))\nforall x (Sluicing(x) and Ebony(x) -> Pronominal(x))\nforall x (Taciturn(x) -> Pronominal(x))\nforall x (Pronominal(x) and Sluicing(x) -> Setose(x))\nEbony(freddie) and Setose(freddie) -> not Pronominal(freddie)\nforall x (Taciturn(x) and Pronominal(x) -> not Ebony(x))\n\nTaciturn(freddie)\n\nSetose(freddie) and forall x (Setose(x) -> Taciturn(x)) -> therefore Taciturn(freddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The willow is serpentine. All serpentine people are plumate. If the willow is aldehydic and the willow is adventive then the willow is serpentine. If someone is adventive then they are lamarckian. If someone is aldehydic and adventive then they are lamarckian. If someone is plumate then they are lamarckian. All lamarckian, aldehydic people are serpentine. If the willow is adventive and the willow is serpentine then the willow is not lamarckian. Rough, lamarckian people are not adventive. The willow is not plumate.", "logic": "\nSerpentine(willow)\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Plumate(x))\nAldehydic(willow) and Adventive(willow) -> Serpentine(willow)\nforall x (Adventive(x) -> Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Aldehydic(x) and Adventive(x) -> Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Plumate(x) -> Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) and Aldehydic(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nAdventive(willow) and Serpentine(willow) -> not Lamarckian(willow)\nforall x (Plumate(x) and Lamarckian(x) -> not Adventive(x))\n\nnot Plumate(willow)\n\nSerpentine(willow) and forall x (Serpentine(x) -> Plumate(x)) -> therefore Plumate(willow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The celisse is relational. All relational people are special. If the celisse is sanitised and the celisse is lavish then the celisse is relational. If someone is lavish then they are starchlike. If someone is sanitised and lavish then they are starchlike. If someone is special then they are starchlike. All starchlike, sanitised people are relational. If the celisse is lavish and the celisse is relational then the celisse is not starchlike. Rough, starchlike people are not lavish. The celisse is starchlike.", "logic": "\nRelational(celisse)\nforall x (Relational(x) -> Special(x))\nSanitised(celisse) and Lavish(celisse) -> Relational(celisse)\nforall x (Lavish(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nforall x (Sanitised(x) and Lavish(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nforall x (Special(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nforall x (Starchlike(x) and Sanitised(x) -> Relational(x))\nLavish(celisse) and Relational(celisse) -> not Starchlike(celisse)\nforall x (Special(x) and Starchlike(x) -> not Lavish(x))\n\nStarchlike(celisse)\n\nRelational(celisse) and forall x (Relational(x) -> Special(x)) -> therefore Special(celisse) Special(celisse) and forall x (Special(x) -> Starchlike(x)) -> therefore Starchlike(celisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The lysandra is sunlit. All sunlit people are spinose. If the lysandra is nominated and the lysandra is puberulent then the lysandra is sunlit. If someone is puberulent then they are uncarpeted. If someone is nominated and puberulent then they are uncarpeted. If someone is spinose then they are uncarpeted. All uncarpeted, nominated people are sunlit. If the lysandra is puberulent and the lysandra is sunlit then the lysandra is not uncarpeted. Rough, uncarpeted people are not puberulent. The lysandra is not uncarpeted.", "logic": "\nSunlit(lysandra)\nforall x (Sunlit(x) -> Spinose(x))\nNominated(lysandra) and Puberulent(lysandra) -> Sunlit(lysandra)\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) and Nominated(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nPuberulent(lysandra) and Sunlit(lysandra) -> not Uncarpeted(lysandra)\nforall x (Spinose(x) and Uncarpeted(x) -> not Puberulent(x))\n\nnot Uncarpeted(lysandra)\n\nSunlit(lysandra) and forall x (Sunlit(x) -> Spinose(x)) -> therefore Spinose(lysandra) Spinose(lysandra) and forall x (Spinose(x) -> Uncarpeted(x)) -> therefore Uncarpeted(lysandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The millicent is dismayed. All dismayed people are vestiary. If the millicent is uncomely and the millicent is papist then the millicent is dismayed. If someone is papist then they are briery. If someone is uncomely and papist then they are briery. If someone is vestiary then they are briery. All briery, uncomely people are dismayed. If the millicent is papist and the millicent is dismayed then the millicent is not briery. Rough, briery people are not papist. The millicent is not papist.", "logic": "\nDismayed(millicent)\nforall x (Dismayed(x) -> Vestiary(x))\nUncomely(millicent) and Papist(millicent) -> Dismayed(millicent)\nforall x (Papist(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Uncomely(x) and Papist(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Vestiary(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Briery(x) and Uncomely(x) -> Dismayed(x))\nPapist(millicent) and Dismayed(millicent) -> not Briery(millicent)\nforall x (Vestiary(x) and Briery(x) -> not Papist(x))\n\nnot Papist(millicent)\n\nDismayed(millicent) and forall x (Dismayed(x) -> Vestiary(x)) -> therefore Vestiary(millicent) Dismayed(millicent) and forall x (Dismayed(x) -> Vestiary(x)) -> therefore Vestiary(millicent) Vestiary(millicent) and forall x (Vestiary(x) -> Briery(x)) -> therefore Briery(millicent) Vestiary(millicent) and Briery(millicent) and forall x (Vestiary(x) and Briery(x) -> not Papist(x)) -> therefore not Papist(millicent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The yelena is nauseated. All nauseated people are lipless. If the yelena is tyrannous and the yelena is naming then the yelena is nauseated. If someone is naming then they are ionised. If someone is tyrannous and naming then they are ionised. If someone is lipless then they are ionised. All ionised, tyrannous people are nauseated. If the yelena is naming and the yelena is nauseated then the yelena is not ionised. Rough, ionised people are not naming. The yelena is naming.", "logic": "\nNauseated(yelena)\nforall x (Nauseated(x) -> Lipless(x))\nTyrannous(yelena) and Naming(yelena) -> Nauseated(yelena)\nforall x (Naming(x) -> Ionised(x))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) and Naming(x) -> Ionised(x))\nforall x (Lipless(x) -> Ionised(x))\nforall x (Ionised(x) and Tyrannous(x) -> Nauseated(x))\nNaming(yelena) and Nauseated(yelena) -> not Ionised(yelena)\nforall x (Lipless(x) and Ionised(x) -> not Naming(x))\n\nNaming(yelena)\n\nNauseated(yelena) and forall x (Nauseated(x) -> Lipless(x)) -> therefore Lipless(yelena) Nauseated(yelena) and forall x (Nauseated(x) -> Lipless(x)) -> therefore Lipless(yelena) Lipless(yelena) and forall x (Lipless(x) -> Ionised(x)) -> therefore Ionised(yelena) Lipless(yelena) and Ionised(yelena) and forall x (Lipless(x) and Ionised(x) -> not Naming(x)) -> therefore not Naming(yelena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The shepard is unshackled. All unshackled people are rococo. If the shepard is tough and the shepard is unlaced then the shepard is unshackled. If someone is unlaced then they are obliged. If someone is tough and unlaced then they are obliged. If someone is rococo then they are obliged. All obliged, tough people are unshackled. If the shepard is unlaced and the shepard is unshackled then the shepard is not obliged. Rough, obliged people are not unlaced. The shepard is not tough.", "logic": "\nUnshackled(shepard)\nforall x (Unshackled(x) -> Rococo(x))\nTough(shepard) and Unlaced(shepard) -> Unshackled(shepard)\nforall x (Unlaced(x) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Tough(x) and Unlaced(x) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Rococo(x) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Obliged(x) and Tough(x) -> Unshackled(x))\nUnlaced(shepard) and Unshackled(shepard) -> not Obliged(shepard)\nforall x (Rococo(x) and Obliged(x) -> not Unlaced(x))\n\nnot Tough(shepard)\n\nnot Tough(shepard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The lianne is waking. All waking people are affecting. If the lianne is disfigured and the lianne is bass then the lianne is waking. If someone is bass then they are awestruck. If someone is disfigured and bass then they are awestruck. If someone is affecting then they are awestruck. All awestruck, disfigured people are waking. If the lianne is bass and the lianne is waking then the lianne is not awestruck. Rough, awestruck people are not bass. The lianne sees the lianne.", "logic": "\nWaking(lianne)\nforall x (Waking(x) -> Affecting(x))\nDisfigured(lianne) and Bass(lianne) -> Waking(lianne)\nforall x (Bass(x) -> Awestruck(x))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) and Bass(x) -> Awestruck(x))\nforall x (Affecting(x) -> Awestruck(x))\nforall x (Awestruck(x) and Disfigured(x) -> Waking(x))\nBass(lianne) and Waking(lianne) -> not Awestruck(lianne)\nforall x (Affecting(x) and Awestruck(x) -> not Bass(x))\n\nSees(lianne, lianne)\n\nSees(lianne, lianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The corabel is undefiled. All undefiled people are corvine. If the corabel is endovenous and the corabel is gibbous then the corabel is undefiled. If someone is gibbous then they are unloaded. If someone is endovenous and gibbous then they are unloaded. If someone is corvine then they are unloaded. All unloaded, endovenous people are undefiled. If the corabel is gibbous and the corabel is undefiled then the corabel is not unloaded. Rough, unloaded people are not gibbous. The corabel does not need the corabel.", "logic": "\nUndefiled(corabel)\nforall x (Undefiled(x) -> Corvine(x))\nEndovenous(corabel) and Gibbous(corabel) -> Undefiled(corabel)\nforall x (Gibbous(x) -> Unloaded(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Gibbous(x) -> Unloaded(x))\nforall x (Corvine(x) -> Unloaded(x))\nforall x (Unloaded(x) and Endovenous(x) -> Undefiled(x))\nGibbous(corabel) and Undefiled(corabel) -> not Unloaded(corabel)\nforall x (Corvine(x) and Unloaded(x) -> not Gibbous(x))\n\nnot Needs(corabel, corabel)\n\nnot Needs(corabel, corabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The joachim is obedient. All obedient people are sisterly. If the joachim is repulsive and the joachim is aneurismal then the joachim is obedient. If someone is aneurismal then they are broken. If someone is repulsive and aneurismal then they are broken. If someone is sisterly then they are broken. All broken, repulsive people are obedient. If the joachim is aneurismal and the joachim is obedient then the joachim is not broken. Rough, broken people are not aneurismal. The joachim chases the joachim.", "logic": "\nObedient(joachim)\nforall x (Obedient(x) -> Sisterly(x))\nRepulsive(joachim) and Aneurismal(joachim) -> Obedient(joachim)\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) and Aneurismal(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Sisterly(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Broken(x) and Repulsive(x) -> Obedient(x))\nAneurismal(joachim) and Obedient(joachim) -> not Broken(joachim)\nforall x (Sisterly(x) and Broken(x) -> not Aneurismal(x))\n\nChases(joachim, joachim)\n\nChases(joachim, joachim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "Pammy is untutored. Willette is not ibsenian. Earle is insolvable. Yetty is ibsenian. Smart things are not helical. All educated, diastolic things are not helical. All diastolic, classified things are not helical. If Yetty is classified and Yetty is helical then Yetty is educated. Young things are classified. If Pammy is not ibsenian and Pammy is not insolvable then Pammy is not helical. If something is helical and insolvable then it is not untutored. If something is ibsenian then it is educated. Earle is insolvable.", "logic": "\nUntutored(pammy)\nnot Ibsenian(willette)\nInsolvable(earle)\nIbsenian(yetty)\nforall x (Classified(x) -> not Helical(x))\nforall x (Educated(x) and Diastolic(x) -> not Helical(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Classified(x) -> not Helical(x))\nClassified(yetty) and Helical(yetty) -> Educated(yetty)\nforall x (Educated(x) -> Classified(x))\nnot Ibsenian(pammy) and not Insolvable(pammy) -> not Helical(pammy)\nforall x (Helical(x) and Insolvable(x) -> not Untutored(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Educated(x))\n\nInsolvable(earle)\n\ntherefore Insolvable(earle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Justina is transitory. Engelbert is not subaltern. Jenette is cuprous. Miriam is subaltern. Smart things are not bristly. All detachable, chalybeate things are not bristly. All chalybeate, monodical things are not bristly. If Miriam is monodical and Miriam is bristly then Miriam is detachable. Young things are monodical. If Justina is not subaltern and Justina is not cuprous then Justina is not bristly. If something is bristly and cuprous then it is not transitory. If something is subaltern then it is detachable. Miriam is not subaltern.", "logic": "\nTransitory(justina)\nnot Subaltern(engelbert)\nCuprous(jenette)\nSubaltern(miriam)\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> not Bristly(x))\nforall x (Detachable(x) and Chalybeate(x) -> not Bristly(x))\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) and Monodical(x) -> not Bristly(x))\nMonodical(miriam) and Bristly(miriam) -> Detachable(miriam)\nforall x (Detachable(x) -> Monodical(x))\nnot Subaltern(justina) and not Cuprous(justina) -> not Bristly(justina)\nforall x (Bristly(x) and Cuprous(x) -> not Transitory(x))\nforall x (Subaltern(x) -> Detachable(x))\n\nnot Subaltern(miriam)\n\ntherefore Subaltern(miriam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Pauli is pendent. Dennie is not gaumless. Megen is acoustical. Diahann is gaumless. Smart things are not baptistic. All riparian, surly things are not baptistic. All surly, meaning things are not baptistic. If Diahann is meaning and Diahann is baptistic then Diahann is riparian. Young things are meaning. If Pauli is not gaumless and Pauli is not acoustical then Pauli is not baptistic. If something is baptistic and acoustical then it is not pendent. If something is gaumless then it is riparian. Diahann is riparian.", "logic": "\nPendent(pauli)\nnot Gaumless(dennie)\nAcoustical(megen)\nGaumless(diahann)\nforall x (Meaning(x) -> not Baptistic(x))\nforall x (Riparian(x) and Surly(x) -> not Baptistic(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) and Meaning(x) -> not Baptistic(x))\nMeaning(diahann) and Baptistic(diahann) -> Riparian(diahann)\nforall x (Riparian(x) -> Meaning(x))\nnot Gaumless(pauli) and not Acoustical(pauli) -> not Baptistic(pauli)\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Acoustical(x) -> not Pendent(x))\nforall x (Gaumless(x) -> Riparian(x))\n\nRiparian(diahann)\n\nGaumless(diahann) and forall x (Gaumless(x) -> Riparian(x)) -> therefore Riparian(diahann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Moira is extirpable. Winton is not touchable. Johnathan is entangled. Bertram is touchable. Smart things are not thrown. All anginose, recovered things are not thrown. All recovered, flexible things are not thrown. If Bertram is flexible and Bertram is thrown then Bertram is anginose. Young things are flexible. If Moira is not touchable and Moira is not entangled then Moira is not thrown. If something is thrown and entangled then it is not extirpable. If something is touchable then it is anginose. Bertram is not anginose.", "logic": "\nExtirpable(moira)\nnot Touchable(winton)\nEntangled(johnathan)\nTouchable(bertram)\nforall x (Flexible(x) -> not Thrown(x))\nforall x (Anginose(x) and Recovered(x) -> not Thrown(x))\nforall x (Recovered(x) and Flexible(x) -> not Thrown(x))\nFlexible(bertram) and Thrown(bertram) -> Anginose(bertram)\nforall x (Anginose(x) -> Flexible(x))\nnot Touchable(moira) and not Entangled(moira) -> not Thrown(moira)\nforall x (Thrown(x) and Entangled(x) -> not Extirpable(x))\nforall x (Touchable(x) -> Anginose(x))\n\nnot Anginose(bertram)\n\nTouchable(bertram) and forall x (Touchable(x) -> Anginose(x)) -> therefore Anginose(bertram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Ericka is glassless. Teena is not wandering. Kathryne is godly. Faye is wandering. Smart things are not cyclical. All evidential, statewide things are not cyclical. All statewide, mangey things are not cyclical. If Faye is mangey and Faye is cyclical then Faye is evidential. Young things are mangey. If Ericka is not wandering and Ericka is not godly then Ericka is not cyclical. If something is cyclical and godly then it is not glassless. If something is wandering then it is evidential. Faye is mangey.", "logic": "\nGlassless(ericka)\nnot Wandering(teena)\nGodly(kathryne)\nWandering(faye)\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> not Cyclical(x))\nforall x (Evidential(x) and Statewide(x) -> not Cyclical(x))\nforall x (Statewide(x) and Mangey(x) -> not Cyclical(x))\nMangey(faye) and Cyclical(faye) -> Evidential(faye)\nforall x (Evidential(x) -> Mangey(x))\nnot Wandering(ericka) and not Godly(ericka) -> not Cyclical(ericka)\nforall x (Cyclical(x) and Godly(x) -> not Glassless(x))\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> Evidential(x))\n\nMangey(faye)\n\nWandering(faye) and forall x (Wandering(x) -> Evidential(x)) -> therefore Evidential(faye) Evidential(faye) and forall x (Evidential(x) -> Mangey(x)) -> therefore Mangey(faye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Corena is assailable. Hillard is not northeast. Cammie is bracteate. Brea is northeast. Smart things are not inverse. All romish, gooselike things are not inverse. All gooselike, individual things are not inverse. If Brea is individual and Brea is inverse then Brea is romish. Young things are individual. If Corena is not northeast and Corena is not bracteate then Corena is not inverse. If something is inverse and bracteate then it is not assailable. If something is northeast then it is romish. Brea is not individual.", "logic": "\nAssailable(corena)\nnot Northeast(hillard)\nBracteate(cammie)\nNortheast(brea)\nforall x (Individual(x) -> not Inverse(x))\nforall x (Romish(x) and Gooselike(x) -> not Inverse(x))\nforall x (Gooselike(x) and Individual(x) -> not Inverse(x))\nIndividual(brea) and Inverse(brea) -> Romish(brea)\nforall x (Romish(x) -> Individual(x))\nnot Northeast(corena) and not Bracteate(corena) -> not Inverse(corena)\nforall x (Inverse(x) and Bracteate(x) -> not Assailable(x))\nforall x (Northeast(x) -> Romish(x))\n\nnot Individual(brea)\n\nNortheast(brea) and forall x (Northeast(x) -> Romish(x)) -> therefore Romish(brea) Romish(brea) and forall x (Romish(x) -> Individual(x)) -> therefore Individual(brea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Angelia is piecemeal. Samson is not notched. Hasheem is errhine. Zed is notched. Smart things are not galilean. All oceangoing, scrabbly things are not galilean. All scrabbly, befogged things are not galilean. If Zed is befogged and Zed is galilean then Zed is oceangoing. Young things are befogged. If Angelia is not notched and Angelia is not errhine then Angelia is not galilean. If something is galilean and errhine then it is not piecemeal. If something is notched then it is oceangoing. Zed is not galilean.", "logic": "\nPiecemeal(angelia)\nnot Notched(samson)\nErrhine(hasheem)\nNotched(zed)\nforall x (Befogged(x) -> not Galilean(x))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) and Scrabbly(x) -> not Galilean(x))\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) and Befogged(x) -> not Galilean(x))\nBefogged(zed) and Galilean(zed) -> Oceangoing(zed)\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Befogged(x))\nnot Notched(angelia) and not Errhine(angelia) -> not Galilean(angelia)\nforall x (Galilean(x) and Errhine(x) -> not Piecemeal(x))\nforall x (Notched(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\n\nnot Galilean(zed)\n\nNotched(zed) and forall x (Notched(x) -> Oceangoing(x)) -> therefore Oceangoing(zed) Oceangoing(zed) and forall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Befogged(x)) -> therefore Befogged(zed) Befogged(zed) and forall x (Befogged(x) -> not Galilean(x)) -> therefore not Galilean(zed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Kirstin is fugitive. Salomone is not buddhistic. Tomas is pouring. Pavla is buddhistic. Smart things are not buttery. All prefaded, artless things are not buttery. All artless, dissenting things are not buttery. If Pavla is dissenting and Pavla is buttery then Pavla is prefaded. Young things are dissenting. If Kirstin is not buddhistic and Kirstin is not pouring then Kirstin is not buttery. If something is buttery and pouring then it is not fugitive. If something is buddhistic then it is prefaded. Pavla is buttery.", "logic": "\nFugitive(kirstin)\nnot Buddhistic(salomone)\nPouring(tomas)\nBuddhistic(pavla)\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> not Buttery(x))\nforall x (Prefaded(x) and Artless(x) -> not Buttery(x))\nforall x (Artless(x) and Dissenting(x) -> not Buttery(x))\nDissenting(pavla) and Buttery(pavla) -> Prefaded(pavla)\nforall x (Prefaded(x) -> Dissenting(x))\nnot Buddhistic(kirstin) and not Pouring(kirstin) -> not Buttery(kirstin)\nforall x (Buttery(x) and Pouring(x) -> not Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Buddhistic(x) -> Prefaded(x))\n\nButtery(pavla)\n\nBuddhistic(pavla) and forall x (Buddhistic(x) -> Prefaded(x)) -> therefore Prefaded(pavla) Prefaded(pavla) and forall x (Prefaded(x) -> Dissenting(x)) -> therefore Dissenting(pavla) Dissenting(pavla) and forall x (Dissenting(x) -> not Buttery(x)) -> therefore not Buttery(pavla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Webb is angled. Carsten is not touristed. Milo is usable. Ulises is touristed. Smart things are not equal. All immoral, allegoric things are not equal. All allegoric, determined things are not equal. If Ulises is determined and Ulises is equal then Ulises is immoral. Young things are determined. If Webb is not touristed and Webb is not usable then Webb is not equal. If something is equal and usable then it is not angled. If something is touristed then it is immoral. Milo is not immoral.", "logic": "\nAngled(webb)\nnot Touristed(carsten)\nUsable(milo)\nTouristed(ulises)\nforall x (Determined(x) -> not Equal(x))\nforall x (Immoral(x) and Allegoric(x) -> not Equal(x))\nforall x (Allegoric(x) and Determined(x) -> not Equal(x))\nDetermined(ulises) and Equal(ulises) -> Immoral(ulises)\nforall x (Immoral(x) -> Determined(x))\nnot Touristed(webb) and not Usable(webb) -> not Equal(webb)\nforall x (Equal(x) and Usable(x) -> not Angled(x))\nforall x (Touristed(x) -> Immoral(x))\n\nnot Immoral(milo)\n\nforall x (Touristed(x) -> Immoral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Katusha is hassidic. Pollyanna is not concurring. Alidia is remediable. Harald is concurring. Smart things are not snaky. All scaleless, extricable things are not snaky. All extricable, elating things are not snaky. If Harald is elating and Harald is snaky then Harald is scaleless. Young things are elating. If Katusha is not concurring and Katusha is not remediable then Katusha is not snaky. If something is snaky and remediable then it is not hassidic. If something is concurring then it is scaleless. Katusha is elating.", "logic": "\nHassidic(katusha)\nnot Concurring(pollyanna)\nRemediable(alidia)\nConcurring(harald)\nforall x (Elating(x) -> not Snaky(x))\nforall x (Scaleless(x) and Extricable(x) -> not Snaky(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and Elating(x) -> not Snaky(x))\nElating(harald) and Snaky(harald) -> Scaleless(harald)\nforall x (Scaleless(x) -> Elating(x))\nnot Concurring(katusha) and not Remediable(katusha) -> not Snaky(katusha)\nforall x (Snaky(x) and Remediable(x) -> not Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Concurring(x) -> Scaleless(x))\n\nElating(katusha)\n\nforall x (Scaleless(x) -> Elating(x)) <- forall x (Concurring(x) -> Scaleless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Loren is stannous. Tildie is not ceremonial. Minda is binomial. Berget is ceremonial. Smart things are not careworn. All pissed, unsloped things are not careworn. All unsloped, unwonted things are not careworn. If Berget is unwonted and Berget is careworn then Berget is pissed. Young things are unwonted. If Loren is not ceremonial and Loren is not binomial then Loren is not careworn. If something is careworn and binomial then it is not stannous. If something is ceremonial then it is pissed. Minda is not unwonted.", "logic": "\nStannous(loren)\nnot Ceremonial(tildie)\nBinomial(minda)\nCeremonial(berget)\nforall x (Unwonted(x) -> not Careworn(x))\nforall x (Pissed(x) and Unsloped(x) -> not Careworn(x))\nforall x (Unsloped(x) and Unwonted(x) -> not Careworn(x))\nUnwonted(berget) and Careworn(berget) -> Pissed(berget)\nforall x (Pissed(x) -> Unwonted(x))\nnot Ceremonial(loren) and not Binomial(loren) -> not Careworn(loren)\nforall x (Careworn(x) and Binomial(x) -> not Stannous(x))\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Pissed(x))\n\nnot Unwonted(minda)\n\nforall x (Pissed(x) -> Unwonted(x)) <- forall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Pissed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Tymothy is runproof. Tuckie is not caller. Liana is imperious. Romona is caller. Smart things are not hired. All temperate, worshipped things are not hired. All worshipped, cutaneal things are not hired. If Romona is cutaneal and Romona is hired then Romona is temperate. Young things are cutaneal. If Tymothy is not caller and Tymothy is not imperious then Tymothy is not hired. If something is hired and imperious then it is not runproof. If something is caller then it is temperate. Tuckie is cutaneal.", "logic": "\nRunproof(tymothy)\nnot Caller(tuckie)\nImperious(liana)\nCaller(romona)\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) -> not Hired(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) and Worshipped(x) -> not Hired(x))\nforall x (Worshipped(x) and Cutaneal(x) -> not Hired(x))\nCutaneal(romona) and Hired(romona) -> Temperate(romona)\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Cutaneal(x))\nnot Caller(tymothy) and not Imperious(tymothy) -> not Hired(tymothy)\nforall x (Hired(x) and Imperious(x) -> not Runproof(x))\nforall x (Caller(x) -> Temperate(x))\n\nCutaneal(tuckie)\n\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Cutaneal(x)) <- forall x (Caller(x) -> Temperate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Henrik is divalent. Walker is not gauzy. Rosella is printable. Rozelle is gauzy. Smart things are not palatal. All billed, myopic things are not palatal. All myopic, cervine things are not palatal. If Rozelle is cervine and Rozelle is palatal then Rozelle is billed. Young things are cervine. If Henrik is not gauzy and Henrik is not printable then Henrik is not palatal. If something is palatal and printable then it is not divalent. If something is gauzy then it is billed. Walker is not printable.", "logic": "\nDivalent(henrik)\nnot Gauzy(walker)\nPrintable(rosella)\nGauzy(rozelle)\nforall x (Cervine(x) -> not Palatal(x))\nforall x (Billed(x) and Myopic(x) -> not Palatal(x))\nforall x (Myopic(x) and Cervine(x) -> not Palatal(x))\nCervine(rozelle) and Palatal(rozelle) -> Billed(rozelle)\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Cervine(x))\nnot Gauzy(henrik) and not Printable(henrik) -> not Palatal(henrik)\nforall x (Palatal(x) and Printable(x) -> not Divalent(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Billed(x))\n\nnot Printable(walker)\n\nnot Printable(walker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Mikael is cacophonic. Estelle is not faultless. Ebeneser is brusque. Franklin is faultless. Smart things are not catatonic. All seventy, erythroid things are not catatonic. All erythroid, suppliant things are not catatonic. If Franklin is suppliant and Franklin is catatonic then Franklin is seventy. Young things are suppliant. If Mikael is not faultless and Mikael is not brusque then Mikael is not catatonic. If something is catatonic and brusque then it is not cacophonic. If something is faultless then it is seventy. Mikael is faultless.", "logic": "\nCacophonic(mikael)\nnot Faultless(estelle)\nBrusque(ebeneser)\nFaultless(franklin)\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> not Catatonic(x))\nforall x (Seventy(x) and Erythroid(x) -> not Catatonic(x))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) and Suppliant(x) -> not Catatonic(x))\nSuppliant(franklin) and Catatonic(franklin) -> Seventy(franklin)\nforall x (Seventy(x) -> Suppliant(x))\nnot Faultless(mikael) and not Brusque(mikael) -> not Catatonic(mikael)\nforall x (Catatonic(x) and Brusque(x) -> not Cacophonic(x))\nforall x (Faultless(x) -> Seventy(x))\n\nFaultless(mikael)\n\nFaultless(mikael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Merlin is euphonical. Donia is not ingrowing. Odin is vietnamese. Praneetf is ingrowing. Smart things are not trimotored. All endless, hulking things are not trimotored. All hulking, recyclable things are not trimotored. If Praneetf is recyclable and Praneetf is trimotored then Praneetf is endless. Young things are recyclable. If Merlin is not ingrowing and Merlin is not vietnamese then Merlin is not trimotored. If something is trimotored and vietnamese then it is not euphonical. If something is ingrowing then it is endless. Donia is not hulking.", "logic": "\nEuphonical(merlin)\nnot Ingrowing(donia)\nVietnamese(odin)\nIngrowing(praneetf)\nforall x (Recyclable(x) -> not Trimotored(x))\nforall x (Endless(x) and Hulking(x) -> not Trimotored(x))\nforall x (Hulking(x) and Recyclable(x) -> not Trimotored(x))\nRecyclable(praneetf) and Trimotored(praneetf) -> Endless(praneetf)\nforall x (Endless(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nnot Ingrowing(merlin) and not Vietnamese(merlin) -> not Trimotored(merlin)\nforall x (Trimotored(x) and Vietnamese(x) -> not Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Endless(x))\n\nnot Hulking(donia)\n\nnot Hulking(donia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Freddie is fimbriate. Lemar is not dimorphic. Adara is hardfisted. Michal is dimorphic. Smart things are not abuzz. All inhibitory, defeasible things are not abuzz. All defeasible, bibliotic things are not abuzz. If Michal is bibliotic and Michal is abuzz then Michal is inhibitory. Young things are bibliotic. If Freddie is not dimorphic and Freddie is not hardfisted then Freddie is not abuzz. If something is abuzz and hardfisted then it is not fimbriate. If something is dimorphic then it is inhibitory. Adara is defeasible.", "logic": "\nFimbriate(freddie)\nnot Dimorphic(lemar)\nHardfisted(adara)\nDimorphic(michal)\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) -> not Abuzz(x))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) and Defeasible(x) -> not Abuzz(x))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and Bibliotic(x) -> not Abuzz(x))\nBibliotic(michal) and Abuzz(michal) -> Inhibitory(michal)\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nnot Dimorphic(freddie) and not Hardfisted(freddie) -> not Abuzz(freddie)\nforall x (Abuzz(x) and Hardfisted(x) -> not Fimbriate(x))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) -> Inhibitory(x))\n\nDefeasible(adara)\n\nDefeasible(adara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Fredrika is foldaway. Bethena is foldaway. Lana is piecemeal. If something is piecemeal then it is not official. If Lana is not official then Lana is foldaway. If something is official and not piecemeal then it is not ahead. If something is rubicund and not piecemeal then it is ahead. Furry things are not ahead. Rough things are not wimpish. If something is foldaway then it is rubicund. Furry things are not rubicund. Lana is piecemeal.", "logic": "\nFoldaway(fredrika)\nFoldaway(bethena)\nPiecemeal(lana)\nforall x (Piecemeal(x) -> not Official(x))\nnot Official(lana) -> Foldaway(lana)\nforall x (Official(x) and not Piecemeal(x) -> not Ahead(x))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) and not Piecemeal(x) -> Ahead(x))\nforall x (Wimpish(x) -> not Ahead(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> not Wimpish(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Wimpish(x) -> not Rubicund(x))\n\nPiecemeal(lana)\n\ntherefore Piecemeal(lana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Emylee is harmonic. Annalyse is harmonic. Bubba is documental. If something is documental then it is not abhorrent. If Bubba is not abhorrent then Bubba is harmonic. If something is abhorrent and not documental then it is not tested. If something is fistulous and not documental then it is tested. Furry things are not tested. Rough things are not vanished. If something is harmonic then it is fistulous. Furry things are not fistulous. Bubba is not documental.", "logic": "\nHarmonic(emylee)\nHarmonic(annalyse)\nDocumental(bubba)\nforall x (Documental(x) -> not Abhorrent(x))\nnot Abhorrent(bubba) -> Harmonic(bubba)\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) and not Documental(x) -> not Tested(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) and not Documental(x) -> Tested(x))\nforall x (Vanished(x) -> not Tested(x))\nforall x (Tested(x) -> not Vanished(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Vanished(x) -> not Fistulous(x))\n\nnot Documental(bubba)\n\ntherefore Documental(bubba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Goldarina is pyrolytic. Tiffi is pyrolytic. Ulric is deflective. If something is deflective then it is not greater. If Ulric is not greater then Ulric is pyrolytic. If something is greater and not deflective then it is not foliaceous. If something is fabricated and not deflective then it is foliaceous. Furry things are not foliaceous. Rough things are not empurpled. If something is pyrolytic then it is fabricated. Furry things are not fabricated. Tiffi is fabricated.", "logic": "\nPyrolytic(goldarina)\nPyrolytic(tiffi)\nDeflective(ulric)\nforall x (Deflective(x) -> not Greater(x))\nnot Greater(ulric) -> Pyrolytic(ulric)\nforall x (Greater(x) and not Deflective(x) -> not Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Fabricated(x) and not Deflective(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Empurpled(x) -> not Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) -> not Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Fabricated(x))\nforall x (Empurpled(x) -> not Fabricated(x))\n\nFabricated(tiffi)\n\nPyrolytic(tiffi) and forall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Fabricated(x)) -> therefore Fabricated(tiffi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Debi is pyknotic. Quint is pyknotic. Idelle is jungian. If something is jungian then it is not retinal. If Idelle is not retinal then Idelle is pyknotic. If something is retinal and not jungian then it is not czaristic. If something is barbellate and not jungian then it is czaristic. Furry things are not czaristic. Rough things are not smallish. If something is pyknotic then it is barbellate. Furry things are not barbellate. Debi is not barbellate.", "logic": "\nPyknotic(debi)\nPyknotic(quint)\nJungian(idelle)\nforall x (Jungian(x) -> not Retinal(x))\nnot Retinal(idelle) -> Pyknotic(idelle)\nforall x (Retinal(x) and not Jungian(x) -> not Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) and not Jungian(x) -> Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Smallish(x) -> not Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Czaristic(x) -> not Smallish(x))\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Barbellate(x))\nforall x (Smallish(x) -> not Barbellate(x))\n\nnot Barbellate(debi)\n\nPyknotic(debi) and forall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Barbellate(x)) -> therefore Barbellate(debi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Ofelia is lithe. Cherice is lithe. Uta is omissive. If something is omissive then it is not inhumane. If Uta is not inhumane then Uta is lithe. If something is inhumane and not omissive then it is not delineate. If something is shod and not omissive then it is delineate. Furry things are not delineate. Rough things are not uncarved. If something is lithe then it is shod. Furry things are not shod. Uta is lithe.", "logic": "\nLithe(ofelia)\nLithe(cherice)\nOmissive(uta)\nforall x (Omissive(x) -> not Inhumane(x))\nnot Inhumane(uta) -> Lithe(uta)\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and not Omissive(x) -> not Delineate(x))\nforall x (Shod(x) and not Omissive(x) -> Delineate(x))\nforall x (Uncarved(x) -> not Delineate(x))\nforall x (Delineate(x) -> not Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) -> Shod(x))\nforall x (Uncarved(x) -> not Shod(x))\n\nLithe(uta)\n\nOmissive(uta) and forall x (Omissive(x) -> not Inhumane(x)) -> therefore not Inhumane(uta) not Inhumane(uta) and not Inhumane(uta) -> Lithe(uta) -> therefore Lithe(uta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Vickie is glace. Zorina is glace. See is unstressed. If something is unstressed then it is not mammary. If See is not mammary then See is glace. If something is mammary and not unstressed then it is not acrogenic. If something is grabby and not unstressed then it is acrogenic. Furry things are not acrogenic. Rough things are not persuasive. If something is glace then it is grabby. Furry things are not grabby. See is not glace.", "logic": "\nGlace(vickie)\nGlace(zorina)\nUnstressed(see)\nforall x (Unstressed(x) -> not Mammary(x))\nnot Mammary(see) -> Glace(see)\nforall x (Mammary(x) and not Unstressed(x) -> not Acrogenic(x))\nforall x (Grabby(x) and not Unstressed(x) -> Acrogenic(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) -> not Acrogenic(x))\nforall x (Acrogenic(x) -> not Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) -> Grabby(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) -> not Grabby(x))\n\nnot Glace(see)\n\nUnstressed(see) and forall x (Unstressed(x) -> not Mammary(x)) -> therefore not Mammary(see) not Mammary(see) and not Mammary(see) -> Glace(see) -> therefore Glace(see)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Noelyn is agamic. Katleen is agamic. Gav is stertorous. If something is stertorous then it is not resistant. If Gav is not resistant then Gav is agamic. If something is resistant and not stertorous then it is not germfree. If something is pointed and not stertorous then it is germfree. Furry things are not germfree. Rough things are not carven. If something is agamic then it is pointed. Furry things are not pointed. Gav is pointed.", "logic": "\nAgamic(noelyn)\nAgamic(katleen)\nStertorous(gav)\nforall x (Stertorous(x) -> not Resistant(x))\nnot Resistant(gav) -> Agamic(gav)\nforall x (Resistant(x) and not Stertorous(x) -> not Germfree(x))\nforall x (Pointed(x) and not Stertorous(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Carven(x) -> not Germfree(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) -> not Carven(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Pointed(x))\nforall x (Carven(x) -> not Pointed(x))\n\nPointed(gav)\n\nStertorous(gav) and forall x (Stertorous(x) -> not Resistant(x)) -> therefore not Resistant(gav) not Resistant(gav) and not Resistant(gav) -> Agamic(gav) -> therefore Agamic(gav) Agamic(gav) and forall x (Agamic(x) -> Pointed(x)) -> therefore Pointed(gav)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Humbert is boskopoid. Zara is boskopoid. Rem is annular. If something is annular then it is not superhuman. If Rem is not superhuman then Rem is boskopoid. If something is superhuman and not annular then it is not jain. If something is idyllic and not annular then it is jain. Furry things are not jain. Rough things are not biblical. If something is boskopoid then it is idyllic. Furry things are not idyllic. Rem is not idyllic.", "logic": "\nBoskopoid(humbert)\nBoskopoid(zara)\nAnnular(rem)\nforall x (Annular(x) -> not Superhuman(x))\nnot Superhuman(rem) -> Boskopoid(rem)\nforall x (Superhuman(x) and not Annular(x) -> not Jain(x))\nforall x (Idyllic(x) and not Annular(x) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) -> not Jain(x))\nforall x (Jain(x) -> not Biblical(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Idyllic(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) -> not Idyllic(x))\n\nnot Idyllic(rem)\n\nAnnular(rem) and forall x (Annular(x) -> not Superhuman(x)) -> therefore not Superhuman(rem) not Superhuman(rem) and not Superhuman(rem) -> Boskopoid(rem) -> therefore Boskopoid(rem) Boskopoid(rem) and forall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Idyllic(x)) -> therefore Idyllic(rem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Allis is bellying. Raina is bellying. Neil is diffused. If something is diffused then it is not godly. If Neil is not godly then Neil is bellying. If something is godly and not diffused then it is not salvific. If something is somnolent and not diffused then it is salvific. Furry things are not salvific. Rough things are not partible. If something is bellying then it is somnolent. Furry things are not somnolent. Allis is not salvific.", "logic": "\nBellying(allis)\nBellying(raina)\nDiffused(neil)\nforall x (Diffused(x) -> not Godly(x))\nnot Godly(neil) -> Bellying(neil)\nforall x (Godly(x) and not Diffused(x) -> not Salvific(x))\nforall x (Somnolent(x) and not Diffused(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) -> not Salvific(x))\nforall x (Salvific(x) -> not Partible(x))\nforall x (Bellying(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) -> not Somnolent(x))\n\nnot Salvific(allis)\n\nforall x (Somnolent(x) and not Diffused(x) -> Salvific(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Goldarina is prodigal. Gilbert is prodigal. Mahesh is laboring. If something is laboring then it is not jesuitic. If Mahesh is not jesuitic then Mahesh is prodigal. If something is jesuitic and not laboring then it is not burned. If something is eighth and not laboring then it is burned. Furry things are not burned. Rough things are not grand. If something is prodigal then it is eighth. Furry things are not eighth. Mahesh is burned.", "logic": "\nProdigal(goldarina)\nProdigal(gilbert)\nLaboring(mahesh)\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> not Jesuitic(x))\nnot Jesuitic(mahesh) -> Prodigal(mahesh)\nforall x (Jesuitic(x) and not Laboring(x) -> not Burned(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and not Laboring(x) -> Burned(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) -> not Burned(x))\nforall x (Burned(x) -> not Grand(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) -> not Eighth(x))\n\nBurned(mahesh)\n\nforall x (Eighth(x) and not Laboring(x) -> Burned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Chariot is cogent. Efram is cogent. Margaret is spotless. If something is spotless then it is not postpaid. If Margaret is not postpaid then Margaret is cogent. If something is postpaid and not spotless then it is not unlipped. If something is villainous and not spotless then it is unlipped. Furry things are not unlipped. Rough things are not looseleaf. If something is cogent then it is villainous. Furry things are not villainous. Efram is not unlipped.", "logic": "\nCogent(chariot)\nCogent(efram)\nSpotless(margaret)\nforall x (Spotless(x) -> not Postpaid(x))\nnot Postpaid(margaret) -> Cogent(margaret)\nforall x (Postpaid(x) and not Spotless(x) -> not Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Villainous(x) and not Spotless(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> not Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Unlipped(x) -> not Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Cogent(x) -> Villainous(x))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> not Villainous(x))\n\nnot Unlipped(efram)\n\nforall x (Villainous(x) and not Spotless(x) -> Unlipped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Wendall is oppressed. Tildi is oppressed. Gearard is peruvian. If something is peruvian then it is not contrabass. If Gearard is not contrabass then Gearard is oppressed. If something is contrabass and not peruvian then it is not cognisant. If something is minuscular and not peruvian then it is cognisant. Furry things are not cognisant. Rough things are not malarial. If something is oppressed then it is minuscular. Furry things are not minuscular. Wendall is peruvian.", "logic": "\nOppressed(wendall)\nOppressed(tildi)\nPeruvian(gearard)\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> not Contrabass(x))\nnot Contrabass(gearard) -> Oppressed(gearard)\nforall x (Contrabass(x) and not Peruvian(x) -> not Cognisant(x))\nforall x (Minuscular(x) and not Peruvian(x) -> Cognisant(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) -> not Cognisant(x))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) -> not Malarial(x))\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Minuscular(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) -> not Minuscular(x))\n\nPeruvian(wendall)\n\nPeruvian(wendall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Nicoline is vacuous. Dyna is vacuous. Ferguson is hirsute. If something is hirsute then it is not receivable. If Ferguson is not receivable then Ferguson is vacuous. If something is receivable and not hirsute then it is not approving. If something is boozy and not hirsute then it is approving. Furry things are not approving. Rough things are not geodetic. If something is vacuous then it is boozy. Furry things are not boozy. Dyna is not smart.", "logic": "\nVacuous(nicoline)\nVacuous(dyna)\nHirsute(ferguson)\nforall x (Hirsute(x) -> not Receivable(x))\nnot Receivable(ferguson) -> Vacuous(ferguson)\nforall x (Receivable(x) and not Hirsute(x) -> not Approving(x))\nforall x (Boozy(x) and not Hirsute(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> not Approving(x))\nforall x (Approving(x) -> not Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) -> Boozy(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> not Boozy(x))\n\nnot Smart(dyna)\n\nnot Smart(dyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Marinna is hypotonic. Robinia is hypotonic. Agna is graspable. If something is graspable then it is not elder. If Agna is not elder then Agna is hypotonic. If something is elder and not graspable then it is not bicornuate. If something is fungicidal and not graspable then it is bicornuate. Furry things are not bicornuate. Rough things are not christless. If something is hypotonic then it is fungicidal. Furry things are not fungicidal. Marinna is elder.", "logic": "\nHypotonic(marinna)\nHypotonic(robinia)\nGraspable(agna)\nforall x (Graspable(x) -> not Elder(x))\nnot Elder(agna) -> Hypotonic(agna)\nforall x (Elder(x) and not Graspable(x) -> not Bicornuate(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) and not Graspable(x) -> Bicornuate(x))\nforall x (Christless(x) -> not Bicornuate(x))\nforall x (Bicornuate(x) -> not Christless(x))\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Christless(x) -> not Fungicidal(x))\n\nElder(marinna)\n\nElder(marinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Uriel is embattled. Liz is embattled. Leila is annalistic. If something is annalistic then it is not abulic. If Leila is not abulic then Leila is embattled. If something is abulic and not annalistic then it is not impatient. If something is devout and not annalistic then it is impatient. Furry things are not impatient. Rough things are not moneyless. If something is embattled then it is devout. Furry things are not devout. Uriel is not smart.", "logic": "\nEmbattled(uriel)\nEmbattled(liz)\nAnnalistic(leila)\nforall x (Annalistic(x) -> not Abulic(x))\nnot Abulic(leila) -> Embattled(leila)\nforall x (Abulic(x) and not Annalistic(x) -> not Impatient(x))\nforall x (Devout(x) and not Annalistic(x) -> Impatient(x))\nforall x (Moneyless(x) -> not Impatient(x))\nforall x (Impatient(x) -> not Moneyless(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) -> Devout(x))\nforall x (Moneyless(x) -> not Devout(x))\n\nnot Smart(uriel)\n\nnot Smart(uriel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Sherri is dishonest. Frederico is dishonest. Colbert is motorised. If something is motorised then it is not inspiring. If Colbert is not inspiring then Colbert is dishonest. If something is inspiring and not motorised then it is not uncarved. If something is unshod and not motorised then it is uncarved. Furry things are not uncarved. Rough things are not swampy. If something is dishonest then it is unshod. Furry things are not unshod. Frederico is swampy.", "logic": "\nDishonest(sherri)\nDishonest(frederico)\nMotorised(colbert)\nforall x (Motorised(x) -> not Inspiring(x))\nnot Inspiring(colbert) -> Dishonest(colbert)\nforall x (Inspiring(x) and not Motorised(x) -> not Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Unshod(x) and not Motorised(x) -> Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Swampy(x) -> not Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Uncarved(x) -> not Swampy(x))\nforall x (Dishonest(x) -> Unshod(x))\nforall x (Swampy(x) -> not Unshod(x))\n\nSwampy(frederico)\n\nSwampy(frederico) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Uri is unmourned. Lynsey is recessive. Ugo is batholitic. Sarena is unworried. All chance things are recessive. Blue, isentropic things are unworried. If something is melted then it is chance. All melted, isentropic things are chance. Cold things are melted. If Uri is chance then Uri is batholitic. Sarena is unworried.", "logic": "\nUnmourned(uri)\nRecessive(lynsey)\nBatholitic(ugo)\nUnworried(sarena)\nforall x (Chance(x) -> Recessive(x))\nforall x (Batholitic(x) and Isentropic(x) -> Unworried(x))\nforall x (Melted(x) -> Chance(x))\nforall x (Melted(x) and Isentropic(x) -> Chance(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) -> Melted(x))\nChance(uri) -> Batholitic(uri)\n\nUnworried(sarena)\n\ntherefore Unworried(sarena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Brodie is fiduciary. Lorry is pontifical. Carroll is mystifying. Westbrook is maximum. All agonised things are pontifical. Blue, uneconomic things are maximum. If something is premarital then it is agonised. All premarital, uneconomic things are agonised. Cold things are premarital. If Brodie is agonised then Brodie is mystifying. Westbrook is not maximum.", "logic": "\nFiduciary(brodie)\nPontifical(lorry)\nMystifying(carroll)\nMaximum(westbrook)\nforall x (Agonised(x) -> Pontifical(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) and Uneconomic(x) -> Maximum(x))\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> Agonised(x))\nforall x (Premarital(x) and Uneconomic(x) -> Agonised(x))\nforall x (Fiduciary(x) -> Premarital(x))\nAgonised(brodie) -> Mystifying(brodie)\n\nnot Maximum(westbrook)\n\ntherefore Maximum(westbrook)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Florenza is formal. Baldwin is unfaceted. Christan is vulpine. Rasla is isometric. All austrian things are unfaceted. Blue, metallike things are isometric. If something is foster then it is austrian. All foster, metallike things are austrian. Cold things are foster. If Florenza is austrian then Florenza is vulpine. Florenza is foster.", "logic": "\nFormal(florenza)\nUnfaceted(baldwin)\nVulpine(christan)\nIsometric(rasla)\nforall x (Austrian(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) and Metallike(x) -> Isometric(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) -> Austrian(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) and Metallike(x) -> Austrian(x))\nforall x (Formal(x) -> Foster(x))\nAustrian(florenza) -> Vulpine(florenza)\n\nFoster(florenza)\n\nFormal(florenza) and forall x (Formal(x) -> Foster(x)) -> therefore Foster(florenza)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Demetra is benign. Sydney is unreleased. Datha is isopteran. Raychel is confusing. All stretchy things are unreleased. Blue, gaumless things are confusing. If something is crenulated then it is stretchy. All crenulated, gaumless things are stretchy. Cold things are crenulated. If Demetra is stretchy then Demetra is isopteran. Demetra is not crenulated.", "logic": "\nBenign(demetra)\nUnreleased(sydney)\nIsopteran(datha)\nConfusing(raychel)\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Unreleased(x))\nforall x (Isopteran(x) and Gaumless(x) -> Confusing(x))\nforall x (Crenulated(x) -> Stretchy(x))\nforall x (Crenulated(x) and Gaumless(x) -> Stretchy(x))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Crenulated(x))\nStretchy(demetra) -> Isopteran(demetra)\n\nnot Crenulated(demetra)\n\nBenign(demetra) and forall x (Benign(x) -> Crenulated(x)) -> therefore Crenulated(demetra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Jolee is commensal. Shawn is gnostic. Giorgia is telephonic. Vicky is oafish. All bullnecked things are gnostic. Blue, underage things are oafish. If something is astral then it is bullnecked. All astral, underage things are bullnecked. Cold things are astral. If Jolee is bullnecked then Jolee is telephonic. Jolee is bullnecked.", "logic": "\nCommensal(jolee)\nGnostic(shawn)\nTelephonic(giorgia)\nOafish(vicky)\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Telephonic(x) and Underage(x) -> Oafish(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Underage(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Astral(x))\nBullnecked(jolee) -> Telephonic(jolee)\n\nBullnecked(jolee)\n\nCommensal(jolee) and forall x (Commensal(x) -> Astral(x)) -> therefore Astral(jolee) Astral(jolee) and forall x (Astral(x) -> Bullnecked(x)) -> therefore Bullnecked(jolee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Merry is nicaraguan. Rudiger is omissive. Anette is vaporific. Gloriane is farthest. All lossless things are omissive. Blue, floaty things are farthest. If something is bilabiate then it is lossless. All bilabiate, floaty things are lossless. Cold things are bilabiate. If Merry is lossless then Merry is vaporific. Merry is not lossless.", "logic": "\nNicaraguan(merry)\nOmissive(rudiger)\nVaporific(anette)\nFarthest(gloriane)\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) and Floaty(x) -> Farthest(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) and Floaty(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nLossless(merry) -> Vaporific(merry)\n\nnot Lossless(merry)\n\nNicaraguan(merry) and forall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Bilabiate(x)) -> therefore Bilabiate(merry) Bilabiate(merry) and forall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Lossless(x)) -> therefore Lossless(merry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Lauralee is coagulable. Dolorita is extensive. Emil is entozoic. Vernice is concluded. All seeing things are extensive. Blue, precise things are concluded. If something is germfree then it is seeing. All germfree, precise things are seeing. Cold things are germfree. If Lauralee is seeing then Lauralee is entozoic. Lauralee is extensive.", "logic": "\nCoagulable(lauralee)\nExtensive(dolorita)\nEntozoic(emil)\nConcluded(vernice)\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) and Precise(x) -> Concluded(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) and Precise(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) -> Germfree(x))\nSeeing(lauralee) -> Entozoic(lauralee)\n\nExtensive(lauralee)\n\nCoagulable(lauralee) and forall x (Coagulable(x) -> Germfree(x)) -> therefore Germfree(lauralee) Germfree(lauralee) and forall x (Germfree(x) -> Seeing(x)) -> therefore Seeing(lauralee) Seeing(lauralee) and forall x (Seeing(x) -> Extensive(x)) -> therefore Extensive(lauralee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Justine is dystopian. Lucilia is digressive. Gerald is calculous. Roseann is sprawling. All velar things are digressive. Blue, uncool things are sprawling. If something is extralegal then it is velar. All extralegal, uncool things are velar. Cold things are extralegal. If Justine is velar then Justine is calculous. Justine is not calculous.", "logic": "\nDystopian(justine)\nDigressive(lucilia)\nCalculous(gerald)\nSprawling(roseann)\nforall x (Velar(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) and Uncool(x) -> Sprawling(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) -> Velar(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) and Uncool(x) -> Velar(x))\nforall x (Dystopian(x) -> Extralegal(x))\nVelar(justine) -> Calculous(justine)\n\nnot Calculous(justine)\n\nDystopian(justine) and forall x (Dystopian(x) -> Extralegal(x)) -> therefore Extralegal(justine) Extralegal(justine) and forall x (Extralegal(x) -> Velar(x)) -> therefore Velar(justine) Velar(justine) and Velar(justine) -> Calculous(justine) -> therefore Calculous(justine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Rebekah is lentiform. Camille is inverted. Alyda is watchful. Annabell is obsolete. All anxious things are inverted. Blue, jerky things are obsolete. If something is sulfuric then it is anxious. All sulfuric, jerky things are anxious. Cold things are sulfuric. If Rebekah is anxious then Rebekah is watchful. Alyda is not anxious.", "logic": "\nLentiform(rebekah)\nInverted(camille)\nWatchful(alyda)\nObsolete(annabell)\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Watchful(x) and Jerky(x) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) and Jerky(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Lentiform(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\nAnxious(rebekah) -> Watchful(rebekah)\n\nnot Anxious(alyda)\n\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Anxious(x)) <- forall x (Lentiform(x) -> Sulfuric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Ethelred is abducting. Guendolen is diagnostic. Archy is undamaged. Jennee is besprent. All piddling things are diagnostic. Blue, emeritus things are besprent. If something is estuarine then it is piddling. All estuarine, emeritus things are piddling. Cold things are estuarine. If Ethelred is piddling then Ethelred is undamaged. Jennee is piddling.", "logic": "\nAbducting(ethelred)\nDiagnostic(guendolen)\nUndamaged(archy)\nBesprent(jennee)\nforall x (Piddling(x) -> Diagnostic(x))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) and Emeritus(x) -> Besprent(x))\nforall x (Estuarine(x) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Estuarine(x) and Emeritus(x) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Abducting(x) -> Estuarine(x))\nPiddling(ethelred) -> Undamaged(ethelred)\n\nPiddling(jennee)\n\nforall x (Estuarine(x) -> Piddling(x)) <- forall x (Abducting(x) -> Estuarine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Nell is panicked. Dedra is emeritus. Siouxie is umpteenth. Jobi is light. All victorian things are emeritus. Blue, hypodermal things are light. If something is greatest then it is victorian. All greatest, hypodermal things are victorian. Cold things are greatest. If Nell is victorian then Nell is umpteenth. Nell is not light.", "logic": "\nPanicked(nell)\nEmeritus(dedra)\nUmpteenth(siouxie)\nLight(jobi)\nforall x (Victorian(x) -> Emeritus(x))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) and Hypodermal(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Greatest(x) -> Victorian(x))\nforall x (Greatest(x) and Hypodermal(x) -> Victorian(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Greatest(x))\nVictorian(nell) -> Umpteenth(nell)\n\nnot Light(nell)\n\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) and Hypodermal(x) -> Light(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Kerrie is resolvable. Barb is sent. Leroy is fatherly. Johannah is univalent. All sulphuric things are sent. Blue, scrawny things are univalent. If something is analeptic then it is sulphuric. All analeptic, scrawny things are sulphuric. Cold things are analeptic. If Kerrie is sulphuric then Kerrie is fatherly. Barb is sulphuric.", "logic": "\nResolvable(kerrie)\nSent(barb)\nFatherly(leroy)\nUnivalent(johannah)\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Sent(x))\nforall x (Fatherly(x) and Scrawny(x) -> Univalent(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) and Scrawny(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Resolvable(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nSulphuric(kerrie) -> Fatherly(kerrie)\n\nSulphuric(barb)\n\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Sulphuric(x)) <- forall x (Resolvable(x) -> Analeptic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Joann is likely. Shawnee is nonpareil. Bettine is afoul. Barbe is viviparous. All unamended things are nonpareil. Blue, hadal things are viviparous. If something is lusterless then it is unamended. All lusterless, hadal things are unamended. Cold things are lusterless. If Joann is unamended then Joann is afoul. Barbe is not likely.", "logic": "\nLikely(joann)\nNonpareil(shawnee)\nAfoul(bettine)\nViviparous(barbe)\nforall x (Unamended(x) -> Nonpareil(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Hadal(x) -> Viviparous(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Unamended(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) and Hadal(x) -> Unamended(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nUnamended(joann) -> Afoul(joann)\n\nnot Likely(barbe)\n\nnot Likely(barbe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Morley is curly. Suki is negroid. Elly is moonlit. Prue is romansh. All coherent things are negroid. Blue, acceptable things are romansh. If something is absent then it is coherent. All absent, acceptable things are coherent. Cold things are absent. If Morley is coherent then Morley is moonlit. Elly is curly.", "logic": "\nCurly(morley)\nNegroid(suki)\nMoonlit(elly)\nRomansh(prue)\nforall x (Coherent(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Moonlit(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) -> Coherent(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Coherent(x))\nforall x (Curly(x) -> Absent(x))\nCoherent(morley) -> Moonlit(morley)\n\nCurly(elly)\n\nCurly(elly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Dean is vocative. Bobbie is plausive. Gustavo is cancelled. Josiah is early. All broadloom things are plausive. Blue, vigesimal things are early. If something is uppity then it is broadloom. All uppity, vigesimal things are broadloom. Cold things are uppity. If Dean is broadloom then Dean is cancelled. Bobbie is not vigesimal.", "logic": "\nVocative(dean)\nPlausive(bobbie)\nCancelled(gustavo)\nEarly(josiah)\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> Plausive(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) and Vigesimal(x) -> Early(x))\nforall x (Uppity(x) -> Broadloom(x))\nforall x (Uppity(x) and Vigesimal(x) -> Broadloom(x))\nforall x (Vocative(x) -> Uppity(x))\nBroadloom(dean) -> Cancelled(dean)\n\nnot Vigesimal(bobbie)\n\nnot Vigesimal(bobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Arlena is crocked. Marchall is conniving. Ashlie is outlying. Prissie is windward. All nipponese things are conniving. Blue, slipshod things are windward. If something is jugular then it is nipponese. All jugular, slipshod things are nipponese. Cold things are jugular. If Arlena is nipponese then Arlena is outlying. Marchall is outlying.", "logic": "\nCrocked(arlena)\nConniving(marchall)\nOutlying(ashlie)\nWindward(prissie)\nforall x (Nipponese(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Outlying(x) and Slipshod(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Jugular(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Jugular(x) and Slipshod(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Crocked(x) -> Jugular(x))\nNipponese(arlena) -> Outlying(arlena)\n\nOutlying(marchall)\n\nOutlying(marchall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Kurtis is wrong. Kurtis is outfitted. Madalena is provincial. Madalena is schematic. Madalena is stalwart. Madalena is dateable. Reeta is wrong. Reeta is outfitted. Reeta is provincial. Reeta is schematic. Reeta is dateable. Reeta is verbal. Miguelita is wrong. Miguelita is outfitted. Miguelita is provincial. All wrong things are stalwart. If something is stalwart then it is provincial. All stalwart, provincial things are verbal. Kurtis is outfitted.", "logic": "\nWrong(kurtis)\nOutfitted(kurtis)\nProvincial(madalena)\nSchematic(madalena)\nStalwart(madalena)\nDateable(madalena)\nWrong(reeta)\nOutfitted(reeta)\nProvincial(reeta)\nSchematic(reeta)\nDateable(reeta)\nVerbal(reeta)\nWrong(miguelita)\nOutfitted(miguelita)\nProvincial(miguelita)\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nforall x (Stalwart(x) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Stalwart(x) and Provincial(x) -> Verbal(x))\n\nOutfitted(kurtis)\n\ntherefore Outfitted(kurtis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Glenda is italian. Glenda is posed. Roxana is deceitful. Roxana is oily. Roxana is branching. Roxana is stocked. Sheree is italian. Sheree is posed. Sheree is deceitful. Sheree is oily. Sheree is stocked. Sheree is tawdry. Nisa is italian. Nisa is posed. Nisa is deceitful. All italian things are branching. If something is branching then it is deceitful. All branching, deceitful things are tawdry. Nisa is not deceitful.", "logic": "\nItalian(glenda)\nPosed(glenda)\nDeceitful(roxana)\nOily(roxana)\nBranching(roxana)\nStocked(roxana)\nItalian(sheree)\nPosed(sheree)\nDeceitful(sheree)\nOily(sheree)\nStocked(sheree)\nTawdry(sheree)\nItalian(nisa)\nPosed(nisa)\nDeceitful(nisa)\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Branching(x))\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Deceitful(x))\nforall x (Branching(x) and Deceitful(x) -> Tawdry(x))\n\nnot Deceitful(nisa)\n\ntherefore Deceitful(nisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Gretel is darned. Gretel is horrifying. Terrye is scheduled. Terrye is follicular. Terrye is bismuthic. Terrye is drastic. Mair is darned. Mair is horrifying. Mair is scheduled. Mair is follicular. Mair is drastic. Mair is cannibalic. Sandra is darned. Sandra is horrifying. Sandra is scheduled. All darned things are bismuthic. If something is bismuthic then it is scheduled. All bismuthic, scheduled things are cannibalic. Sandra is bismuthic.", "logic": "\nDarned(gretel)\nHorrifying(gretel)\nScheduled(terrye)\nFollicular(terrye)\nBismuthic(terrye)\nDrastic(terrye)\nDarned(mair)\nHorrifying(mair)\nScheduled(mair)\nFollicular(mair)\nDrastic(mair)\nCannibalic(mair)\nDarned(sandra)\nHorrifying(sandra)\nScheduled(sandra)\nforall x (Darned(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) and Scheduled(x) -> Cannibalic(x))\n\nBismuthic(sandra)\n\nDarned(sandra) and forall x (Darned(x) -> Bismuthic(x)) -> therefore Bismuthic(sandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Gamaliel is unchaste. Gamaliel is pomaded. Sharlene is proximate. Sharlene is severe. Sharlene is unmated. Sharlene is lumpy. Ethelin is unchaste. Ethelin is pomaded. Ethelin is proximate. Ethelin is severe. Ethelin is lumpy. Ethelin is leathery. Shari is unchaste. Shari is pomaded. Shari is proximate. All unchaste things are unmated. If something is unmated then it is proximate. All unmated, proximate things are leathery. Ethelin is not unmated.", "logic": "\nUnchaste(gamaliel)\nPomaded(gamaliel)\nProximate(sharlene)\nSevere(sharlene)\nUnmated(sharlene)\nLumpy(sharlene)\nUnchaste(ethelin)\nPomaded(ethelin)\nProximate(ethelin)\nSevere(ethelin)\nLumpy(ethelin)\nLeathery(ethelin)\nUnchaste(shari)\nPomaded(shari)\nProximate(shari)\nforall x (Unchaste(x) -> Unmated(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Proximate(x) -> Leathery(x))\n\nnot Unmated(ethelin)\n\nUnchaste(ethelin) and forall x (Unchaste(x) -> Unmated(x)) -> therefore Unmated(ethelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Annalee is frisky. Annalee is unmapped. Roda is unraised. Roda is scarred. Roda is isometric. Roda is uncaused. Enriqueta is frisky. Enriqueta is unmapped. Enriqueta is unraised. Enriqueta is scarred. Enriqueta is uncaused. Enriqueta is fathomable. Major is frisky. Major is unmapped. Major is unraised. All frisky things are isometric. If something is isometric then it is unraised. All isometric, unraised things are fathomable. Major is fathomable.", "logic": "\nFrisky(annalee)\nUnmapped(annalee)\nUnraised(roda)\nScarred(roda)\nIsometric(roda)\nUncaused(roda)\nFrisky(enriqueta)\nUnmapped(enriqueta)\nUnraised(enriqueta)\nScarred(enriqueta)\nUncaused(enriqueta)\nFathomable(enriqueta)\nFrisky(major)\nUnmapped(major)\nUnraised(major)\nforall x (Frisky(x) -> Isometric(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) and Unraised(x) -> Fathomable(x))\n\nFathomable(major)\n\nFrisky(major) and forall x (Frisky(x) -> Isometric(x)) -> therefore Isometric(major) Isometric(major) and Unraised(major) and forall x (Isometric(x) and Unraised(x) -> Fathomable(x)) -> therefore Fathomable(major)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Emilia is unnerving. Emilia is moist. Lynda is deceptive. Lynda is bully. Lynda is unsent. Lynda is leaflike. Danya is unnerving. Danya is moist. Danya is deceptive. Danya is bully. Danya is leaflike. Danya is ambrosial. Fran is unnerving. Fran is moist. Fran is deceptive. All unnerving things are unsent. If something is unsent then it is deceptive. All unsent, deceptive things are ambrosial. Fran is not ambrosial.", "logic": "\nUnnerving(emilia)\nMoist(emilia)\nDeceptive(lynda)\nBully(lynda)\nUnsent(lynda)\nLeaflike(lynda)\nUnnerving(danya)\nMoist(danya)\nDeceptive(danya)\nBully(danya)\nLeaflike(danya)\nAmbrosial(danya)\nUnnerving(fran)\nMoist(fran)\nDeceptive(fran)\nforall x (Unnerving(x) -> Unsent(x))\nforall x (Unsent(x) -> Deceptive(x))\nforall x (Unsent(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\n\nnot Ambrosial(fran)\n\nUnnerving(fran) and forall x (Unnerving(x) -> Unsent(x)) -> therefore Unsent(fran) Unsent(fran) and Deceptive(fran) and forall x (Unsent(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Ambrosial(x)) -> therefore Ambrosial(fran)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Luciano is smashing. Luciano is pyrogenic. Tillie is reformist. Tillie is weedy. Tillie is embryonal. Tillie is mucinoid. Marrilee is smashing. Marrilee is pyrogenic. Marrilee is reformist. Marrilee is weedy. Marrilee is mucinoid. Marrilee is locomotor. Andrus is smashing. Andrus is pyrogenic. Andrus is reformist. All smashing things are embryonal. If something is embryonal then it is reformist. All embryonal, reformist things are locomotor. Luciano is locomotor.", "logic": "\nSmashing(luciano)\nPyrogenic(luciano)\nReformist(tillie)\nWeedy(tillie)\nEmbryonal(tillie)\nMucinoid(tillie)\nSmashing(marrilee)\nPyrogenic(marrilee)\nReformist(marrilee)\nWeedy(marrilee)\nMucinoid(marrilee)\nLocomotor(marrilee)\nSmashing(andrus)\nPyrogenic(andrus)\nReformist(andrus)\nforall x (Smashing(x) -> Embryonal(x))\nforall x (Embryonal(x) -> Reformist(x))\nforall x (Embryonal(x) and Reformist(x) -> Locomotor(x))\n\nLocomotor(luciano)\n\nSmashing(luciano) and forall x (Smashing(x) -> Embryonal(x)) -> therefore Embryonal(luciano) Smashing(luciano) and forall x (Smashing(x) -> Embryonal(x)) -> therefore Embryonal(luciano) Embryonal(luciano) and forall x (Embryonal(x) -> Reformist(x)) -> therefore Reformist(luciano) Embryonal(luciano) and Reformist(luciano) and forall x (Embryonal(x) and Reformist(x) -> Locomotor(x)) -> therefore Locomotor(luciano)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Stanford is curtained. Stanford is barbed. Mario is deboned. Mario is eighteen. Mario is natal. Mario is homemade. Casie is curtained. Casie is barbed. Casie is deboned. Casie is eighteen. Casie is homemade. Casie is sapphire. Sauncho is curtained. Sauncho is barbed. Sauncho is deboned. All curtained things are natal. If something is natal then it is deboned. All natal, deboned things are sapphire. Stanford is not sapphire.", "logic": "\nCurtained(stanford)\nBarbed(stanford)\nDeboned(mario)\nEighteen(mario)\nNatal(mario)\nHomemade(mario)\nCurtained(casie)\nBarbed(casie)\nDeboned(casie)\nEighteen(casie)\nHomemade(casie)\nSapphire(casie)\nCurtained(sauncho)\nBarbed(sauncho)\nDeboned(sauncho)\nforall x (Curtained(x) -> Natal(x))\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Natal(x) and Deboned(x) -> Sapphire(x))\n\nnot Sapphire(stanford)\n\nCurtained(stanford) and forall x (Curtained(x) -> Natal(x)) -> therefore Natal(stanford) Curtained(stanford) and forall x (Curtained(x) -> Natal(x)) -> therefore Natal(stanford) Natal(stanford) and forall x (Natal(x) -> Deboned(x)) -> therefore Deboned(stanford) Natal(stanford) and Deboned(stanford) and forall x (Natal(x) and Deboned(x) -> Sapphire(x)) -> therefore Sapphire(stanford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Sergio is fussy. Sergio is annulated. Carlin is cardboard. Carlin is naked. Carlin is exhausting. Carlin is peeled. Amber is fussy. Amber is annulated. Amber is cardboard. Amber is naked. Amber is peeled. Amber is hinder. Arnoldo is fussy. Arnoldo is annulated. Arnoldo is cardboard. All fussy things are exhausting. If something is exhausting then it is cardboard. All exhausting, cardboard things are hinder. Carlin is not fussy.", "logic": "\nFussy(sergio)\nAnnulated(sergio)\nCardboard(carlin)\nNaked(carlin)\nExhausting(carlin)\nPeeled(carlin)\nFussy(amber)\nAnnulated(amber)\nCardboard(amber)\nNaked(amber)\nPeeled(amber)\nHinder(amber)\nFussy(arnoldo)\nAnnulated(arnoldo)\nCardboard(arnoldo)\nforall x (Fussy(x) -> Exhausting(x))\nforall x (Exhausting(x) -> Cardboard(x))\nforall x (Exhausting(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Hinder(x))\n\nnot Fussy(carlin)\n\nnot Fussy(carlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Sena is aspirant. Sena is nonmusical. Mariam is maleficent. Mariam is unguided. Mariam is zionist. Mariam is formalised. Shoshie is aspirant. Shoshie is nonmusical. Shoshie is maleficent. Shoshie is unguided. Shoshie is formalised. Shoshie is picky. Jewel is aspirant. Jewel is nonmusical. Jewel is maleficent. All aspirant things are zionist. If something is zionist then it is maleficent. All zionist, maleficent things are picky. Jewel is formalised.", "logic": "\nAspirant(sena)\nNonmusical(sena)\nMaleficent(mariam)\nUnguided(mariam)\nZionist(mariam)\nFormalised(mariam)\nAspirant(shoshie)\nNonmusical(shoshie)\nMaleficent(shoshie)\nUnguided(shoshie)\nFormalised(shoshie)\nPicky(shoshie)\nAspirant(jewel)\nNonmusical(jewel)\nMaleficent(jewel)\nforall x (Aspirant(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) -> Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) and Maleficent(x) -> Picky(x))\n\nFormalised(jewel)\n\nFormalised(jewel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Ignace is praising. Ignace is patronized. Kathie is dreamlike. Kathie is fabricated. Kathie is layered. Kathie is rummy. Martelle is praising. Martelle is patronized. Martelle is dreamlike. Martelle is fabricated. Martelle is rummy. Martelle is leisurely. Korella is praising. Korella is patronized. Korella is dreamlike. All praising things are layered. If something is layered then it is dreamlike. All layered, dreamlike things are leisurely. Ignace is not rummy.", "logic": "\nPraising(ignace)\nPatronized(ignace)\nDreamlike(kathie)\nFabricated(kathie)\nLayered(kathie)\nRummy(kathie)\nPraising(martelle)\nPatronized(martelle)\nDreamlike(martelle)\nFabricated(martelle)\nRummy(martelle)\nLeisurely(martelle)\nPraising(korella)\nPatronized(korella)\nDreamlike(korella)\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) -> Dreamlike(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) and Dreamlike(x) -> Leisurely(x))\n\nnot Rummy(ignace)\n\nnot Rummy(ignace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Conan is just. Conan is shivering. Tasia is embattled. Tasia is profuse. Tasia is venomed. Tasia is landed. Oriana is just. Oriana is shivering. Oriana is embattled. Oriana is profuse. Oriana is landed. Oriana is undutiful. Rosene is just. Rosene is shivering. Rosene is embattled. All just things are venomed. If something is venomed then it is embattled. All venomed, embattled things are undutiful. Tasia is shivering.", "logic": "\nJust(conan)\nShivering(conan)\nEmbattled(tasia)\nProfuse(tasia)\nVenomed(tasia)\nLanded(tasia)\nJust(oriana)\nShivering(oriana)\nEmbattled(oriana)\nProfuse(oriana)\nLanded(oriana)\nUndutiful(oriana)\nJust(rosene)\nShivering(rosene)\nEmbattled(rosene)\nforall x (Just(x) -> Venomed(x))\nforall x (Venomed(x) -> Embattled(x))\nforall x (Venomed(x) and Embattled(x) -> Undutiful(x))\n\nShivering(tasia)\n\nShivering(tasia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Harvie is provoked. Harvie is unwarmed. Whittaker is minuscule. Whittaker is irate. Whittaker is quechuan. Whittaker is meltable. Janos is provoked. Janos is unwarmed. Janos is minuscule. Janos is irate. Janos is meltable. Janos is typic. Harriet is provoked. Harriet is unwarmed. Harriet is minuscule. All provoked things are quechuan. If something is quechuan then it is minuscule. All quechuan, minuscule things are typic. Harvie is not irate.", "logic": "\nProvoked(harvie)\nUnwarmed(harvie)\nMinuscule(whittaker)\nIrate(whittaker)\nQuechuan(whittaker)\nMeltable(whittaker)\nProvoked(janos)\nUnwarmed(janos)\nMinuscule(janos)\nIrate(janos)\nMeltable(janos)\nTypic(janos)\nProvoked(harriet)\nUnwarmed(harriet)\nMinuscule(harriet)\nforall x (Provoked(x) -> Quechuan(x))\nforall x (Quechuan(x) -> Minuscule(x))\nforall x (Quechuan(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Typic(x))\n\nnot Irate(harvie)\n\nnot Irate(harvie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Rubia is unwooded. Rubia is shoed. Zebulen is womanlike. Zebulen is squatty. Zebulen is auxinic. Zebulen is utility. Tremaine is unwooded. Tremaine is shoed. Tremaine is womanlike. Tremaine is squatty. Tremaine is utility. Tremaine is rascally. Tannie is unwooded. Tannie is shoed. Tannie is womanlike. All unwooded things are auxinic. If something is auxinic then it is womanlike. All auxinic, womanlike things are rascally. Tannie is squatty.", "logic": "\nUnwooded(rubia)\nShoed(rubia)\nWomanlike(zebulen)\nSquatty(zebulen)\nAuxinic(zebulen)\nUtility(zebulen)\nUnwooded(tremaine)\nShoed(tremaine)\nWomanlike(tremaine)\nSquatty(tremaine)\nUtility(tremaine)\nRascally(tremaine)\nUnwooded(tannie)\nShoed(tannie)\nWomanlike(tannie)\nforall x (Unwooded(x) -> Auxinic(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Rascally(x))\n\nSquatty(tannie)\n\nSquatty(tannie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "The sibella whoop the lusa. The lusa is binomial. If the sibella is acervate and the sibella whoop the lusa then the sibella calender the lusa. If something is acervate then it whoop the sibella. If something calender the lusa then it calender the sibella. If the sibella is acervate then the sibella whoop the lusa. If something is binomial and ovarian then it calender the sibella. If something whoop the lusa then it is acervate. If something calender the lusa then it is ovarian. If something calender the sibella then the sibella beaver the lusa. The sibella whoop the lusa.", "logic": "\nWhoop(sibella, lusa)\nBinomial(lusa)\nAcervate(sibella) and Whoop(sibella, lusa) -> Calender(sibella, lusa)\nforall x (Acervate(x) -> Whoop(x, sibella))\nforall x (Calender(x, lusa) -> Calender(x, sibella))\nAcervate(sibella) -> Whoop(sibella, lusa)\nforall x (Binomial(x) and Ovarian(x) -> Calender(x, sibella))\nforall x (Whoop(x, lusa) -> Acervate(x))\nforall x (Calender(x, lusa) -> Ovarian(x))\nforall x (Calender(x, sibella) -> Beaver(sibella, lusa))\n\nWhoop(sibella, lusa)\n\ntherefore Whoop(sibella, lusa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The mustafa blush the marcelo. The marcelo is polynesian. If the mustafa is leisured and the mustafa blush the marcelo then the mustafa tribulate the marcelo. If something is leisured then it blush the mustafa. If something tribulate the marcelo then it tribulate the mustafa. If the mustafa is leisured then the mustafa blush the marcelo. If something is polynesian and botched then it tribulate the mustafa. If something blush the marcelo then it is leisured. If something tribulate the marcelo then it is botched. If something tribulate the mustafa then the mustafa pressure the marcelo. The marcelo is not polynesian.", "logic": "\nBlush(mustafa, marcelo)\nPolynesian(marcelo)\nLeisured(mustafa) and Blush(mustafa, marcelo) -> Tribulate(mustafa, marcelo)\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Blush(x, mustafa))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, marcelo) -> Tribulate(x, mustafa))\nLeisured(mustafa) -> Blush(mustafa, marcelo)\nforall x (Polynesian(x) and Botched(x) -> Tribulate(x, mustafa))\nforall x (Blush(x, marcelo) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, marcelo) -> Botched(x))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, mustafa) -> Pressure(mustafa, marcelo))\n\nnot Polynesian(marcelo)\n\ntherefore Polynesian(marcelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The alida cool the craig. The craig is chatty. If the alida is seated and the alida cool the craig then the alida jump the craig. If something is seated then it cool the alida. If something jump the craig then it jump the alida. If the alida is seated then the alida cool the craig. If something is chatty and tattling then it jump the alida. If something cool the craig then it is seated. If something jump the craig then it is tattling. If something jump the alida then the alida collimate the craig. The alida is seated.", "logic": "\nCool(alida, craig)\nChatty(craig)\nSeated(alida) and Cool(alida, craig) -> Jump(alida, craig)\nforall x (Seated(x) -> Cool(x, alida))\nforall x (Jump(x, craig) -> Jump(x, alida))\nSeated(alida) -> Cool(alida, craig)\nforall x (Chatty(x) and Tattling(x) -> Jump(x, alida))\nforall x (Cool(x, craig) -> Seated(x))\nforall x (Jump(x, craig) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Jump(x, alida) -> Collimate(alida, craig))\n\nSeated(alida)\n\nCool(alida, craig) and forall x (Cool(x, craig) -> Seated(x)) -> therefore Seated(alida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The silvio uncrate the amandy. The amandy is unsettled. If the silvio is equipotent and the silvio uncrate the amandy then the silvio revolt the amandy. If something is equipotent then it uncrate the silvio. If something revolt the amandy then it revolt the silvio. If the silvio is equipotent then the silvio uncrate the amandy. If something is unsettled and untracked then it revolt the silvio. If something uncrate the amandy then it is equipotent. If something revolt the amandy then it is untracked. If something revolt the silvio then the silvio call the amandy. The silvio is not equipotent.", "logic": "\nUncrate(silvio, amandy)\nUnsettled(amandy)\nEquipotent(silvio) and Uncrate(silvio, amandy) -> Revolt(silvio, amandy)\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Uncrate(x, silvio))\nforall x (Revolt(x, amandy) -> Revolt(x, silvio))\nEquipotent(silvio) -> Uncrate(silvio, amandy)\nforall x (Unsettled(x) and Untracked(x) -> Revolt(x, silvio))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, amandy) -> Equipotent(x))\nforall x (Revolt(x, amandy) -> Untracked(x))\nforall x (Revolt(x, silvio) -> Call(silvio, amandy))\n\nnot Equipotent(silvio)\n\nUncrate(silvio, amandy) and forall x (Uncrate(x, amandy) -> Equipotent(x)) -> therefore Equipotent(silvio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The kaylyn stock the diego. The diego is farseeing. If the kaylyn is dissected and the kaylyn stock the diego then the kaylyn protract the diego. If something is dissected then it stock the kaylyn. If something protract the diego then it protract the kaylyn. If the kaylyn is dissected then the kaylyn stock the diego. If something is farseeing and nursed then it protract the kaylyn. If something stock the diego then it is dissected. If something protract the diego then it is nursed. If something protract the kaylyn then the kaylyn burgle the diego. The kaylyn protract the diego.", "logic": "\nStock(kaylyn, diego)\nFarseeing(diego)\nDissected(kaylyn) and Stock(kaylyn, diego) -> Protract(kaylyn, diego)\nforall x (Dissected(x) -> Stock(x, kaylyn))\nforall x (Protract(x, diego) -> Protract(x, kaylyn))\nDissected(kaylyn) -> Stock(kaylyn, diego)\nforall x (Farseeing(x) and Nursed(x) -> Protract(x, kaylyn))\nforall x (Stock(x, diego) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Protract(x, diego) -> Nursed(x))\nforall x (Protract(x, kaylyn) -> Burgle(kaylyn, diego))\n\nProtract(kaylyn, diego)\n\nStock(kaylyn, diego) and forall x (Stock(x, diego) -> Dissected(x)) -> therefore Dissected(kaylyn) Dissected(kaylyn) and Stock(kaylyn, diego) and Dissected(kaylyn) and Stock(kaylyn, diego) -> Protract(kaylyn, diego) -> therefore Protract(kaylyn, diego)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The mitch theologise the siffre. The siffre is braless. If the mitch is centrist and the mitch theologise the siffre then the mitch examine the siffre. If something is centrist then it theologise the mitch. If something examine the siffre then it examine the mitch. If the mitch is centrist then the mitch theologise the siffre. If something is braless and purifying then it examine the mitch. If something theologise the siffre then it is centrist. If something examine the siffre then it is purifying. If something examine the mitch then the mitch blend the siffre. The mitch does not like the siffre.", "logic": "\nTheologise(mitch, siffre)\nBraless(siffre)\nCentrist(mitch) and Theologise(mitch, siffre) -> Examine(mitch, siffre)\nforall x (Centrist(x) -> Theologise(x, mitch))\nforall x (Examine(x, siffre) -> Examine(x, mitch))\nCentrist(mitch) -> Theologise(mitch, siffre)\nforall x (Braless(x) and Purifying(x) -> Examine(x, mitch))\nforall x (Theologise(x, siffre) -> Centrist(x))\nforall x (Examine(x, siffre) -> Purifying(x))\nforall x (Examine(x, mitch) -> Blend(mitch, siffre))\n\nnot Examine(mitch, siffre)\n\nTheologise(mitch, siffre) and forall x (Theologise(x, siffre) -> Centrist(x)) -> therefore Centrist(mitch) Centrist(mitch) and Theologise(mitch, siffre) and Centrist(mitch) and Theologise(mitch, siffre) -> Examine(mitch, siffre) -> therefore Examine(mitch, siffre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The ephraim gratify the florri. The florri is shady. If the ephraim is demulcent and the ephraim gratify the florri then the ephraim munition the florri. If something is demulcent then it gratify the ephraim. If something munition the florri then it munition the ephraim. If the ephraim is demulcent then the ephraim gratify the florri. If something is shady and murdered then it munition the ephraim. If something gratify the florri then it is demulcent. If something munition the florri then it is murdered. If something munition the ephraim then the ephraim camber the florri. The ephraim is murdered.", "logic": "\nGratify(ephraim, florri)\nShady(florri)\nDemulcent(ephraim) and Gratify(ephraim, florri) -> Munition(ephraim, florri)\nforall x (Demulcent(x) -> Gratify(x, ephraim))\nforall x (Munition(x, florri) -> Munition(x, ephraim))\nDemulcent(ephraim) -> Gratify(ephraim, florri)\nforall x (Shady(x) and Murdered(x) -> Munition(x, ephraim))\nforall x (Gratify(x, florri) -> Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Munition(x, florri) -> Murdered(x))\nforall x (Munition(x, ephraim) -> Camber(ephraim, florri))\n\nMurdered(ephraim)\n\nGratify(ephraim, florri) and forall x (Gratify(x, florri) -> Demulcent(x)) -> therefore Demulcent(ephraim) Demulcent(ephraim) and Gratify(ephraim, florri) and Demulcent(ephraim) and Gratify(ephraim, florri) -> Munition(ephraim, florri) -> therefore Munition(ephraim, florri) Munition(ephraim, florri) and forall x (Munition(x, florri) -> Murdered(x)) -> therefore Murdered(ephraim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The liuka remit the tatum. The tatum is squeezable. If the liuka is bodied and the liuka remit the tatum then the liuka carmine the tatum. If something is bodied then it remit the liuka. If something carmine the tatum then it carmine the liuka. If the liuka is bodied then the liuka remit the tatum. If something is squeezable and pavlovian then it carmine the liuka. If something remit the tatum then it is bodied. If something carmine the tatum then it is pavlovian. If something carmine the liuka then the liuka recuperate the tatum. The liuka does not like the liuka.", "logic": "\nRemit(liuka, tatum)\nSqueezable(tatum)\nBodied(liuka) and Remit(liuka, tatum) -> Carmine(liuka, tatum)\nforall x (Bodied(x) -> Remit(x, liuka))\nforall x (Carmine(x, tatum) -> Carmine(x, liuka))\nBodied(liuka) -> Remit(liuka, tatum)\nforall x (Squeezable(x) and Pavlovian(x) -> Carmine(x, liuka))\nforall x (Remit(x, tatum) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x, tatum) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x, liuka) -> Recuperate(liuka, tatum))\n\nnot Carmine(liuka, liuka)\n\nRemit(liuka, tatum) and forall x (Remit(x, tatum) -> Bodied(x)) -> therefore Bodied(liuka) Bodied(liuka) and Remit(liuka, tatum) and Bodied(liuka) and Remit(liuka, tatum) -> Carmine(liuka, tatum) -> therefore Carmine(liuka, tatum) Carmine(liuka, tatum) and forall x (Carmine(x, tatum) -> Carmine(x, liuka)) -> therefore Carmine(liuka, liuka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The olenka uncompress the jefry. The jefry is leftist. If the olenka is boreal and the olenka uncompress the jefry then the olenka maltreat the jefry. If something is boreal then it uncompress the olenka. If something maltreat the jefry then it maltreat the olenka. If the olenka is boreal then the olenka uncompress the jefry. If something is leftist and bicorn then it maltreat the olenka. If something uncompress the jefry then it is boreal. If something maltreat the jefry then it is bicorn. If something maltreat the olenka then the olenka relocate the jefry. The jefry is not boreal.", "logic": "\nUncompress(olenka, jefry)\nLeftist(jefry)\nBoreal(olenka) and Uncompress(olenka, jefry) -> Maltreat(olenka, jefry)\nforall x (Boreal(x) -> Uncompress(x, olenka))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, jefry) -> Maltreat(x, olenka))\nBoreal(olenka) -> Uncompress(olenka, jefry)\nforall x (Leftist(x) and Bicorn(x) -> Maltreat(x, olenka))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, jefry) -> Boreal(x))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, jefry) -> Bicorn(x))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, olenka) -> Relocate(olenka, jefry))\n\nnot Boreal(jefry)\n\nforall x (Uncompress(x, jefry) -> Boreal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The orlando rebound the rand. The rand is sensitized. If the orlando is tactical and the orlando rebound the rand then the orlando stalinise the rand. If something is tactical then it rebound the orlando. If something stalinise the rand then it stalinise the orlando. If the orlando is tactical then the orlando rebound the rand. If something is sensitized and libelous then it stalinise the orlando. If something rebound the rand then it is tactical. If something stalinise the rand then it is libelous. If something stalinise the orlando then the orlando degrease the rand. The rand is libelous.", "logic": "\nRebound(orlando, rand)\nSensitized(rand)\nTactical(orlando) and Rebound(orlando, rand) -> Stalinise(orlando, rand)\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Rebound(x, orlando))\nforall x (Stalinise(x, rand) -> Stalinise(x, orlando))\nTactical(orlando) -> Rebound(orlando, rand)\nforall x (Sensitized(x) and Libelous(x) -> Stalinise(x, orlando))\nforall x (Rebound(x, rand) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Stalinise(x, rand) -> Libelous(x))\nforall x (Stalinise(x, orlando) -> Degrease(orlando, rand))\n\nLibelous(rand)\n\nforall x (Stalinise(x, rand) -> Libelous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The hali convolve the bliss. The bliss is wearying. If the hali is concealing and the hali convolve the bliss then the hali polemise the bliss. If something is concealing then it convolve the hali. If something polemise the bliss then it polemise the hali. If the hali is concealing then the hali convolve the bliss. If something is wearying and undersized then it polemise the hali. If something convolve the bliss then it is concealing. If something polemise the bliss then it is undersized. If something polemise the hali then the hali cheese the bliss. The bliss does not like the hali.", "logic": "\nConvolve(hali, bliss)\nWearying(bliss)\nConcealing(hali) and Convolve(hali, bliss) -> Polemise(hali, bliss)\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Convolve(x, hali))\nforall x (Polemise(x, bliss) -> Polemise(x, hali))\nConcealing(hali) -> Convolve(hali, bliss)\nforall x (Wearying(x) and Undersized(x) -> Polemise(x, hali))\nforall x (Convolve(x, bliss) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Polemise(x, bliss) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Polemise(x, hali) -> Cheese(hali, bliss))\n\nnot Polemise(bliss, hali)\n\nforall x (Wearying(x) and Undersized(x) -> Polemise(x, hali)) <- forall x (Polemise(x, bliss) -> Undersized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The vladamir sled the broddy. The broddy is silly. If the vladamir is offhanded and the vladamir sled the broddy then the vladamir pride the broddy. If something is offhanded then it sled the vladamir. If something pride the broddy then it pride the vladamir. If the vladamir is offhanded then the vladamir sled the broddy. If something is silly and sluggish then it pride the vladamir. If something sled the broddy then it is offhanded. If something pride the broddy then it is sluggish. If something pride the vladamir then the vladamir replicate the broddy. The broddy sled the vladamir.", "logic": "\nSled(vladamir, broddy)\nSilly(broddy)\nOffhanded(vladamir) and Sled(vladamir, broddy) -> Pride(vladamir, broddy)\nforall x (Offhanded(x) -> Sled(x, vladamir))\nforall x (Pride(x, broddy) -> Pride(x, vladamir))\nOffhanded(vladamir) -> Sled(vladamir, broddy)\nforall x (Silly(x) and Sluggish(x) -> Pride(x, vladamir))\nforall x (Sled(x, broddy) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Pride(x, broddy) -> Sluggish(x))\nforall x (Pride(x, vladamir) -> Replicate(vladamir, broddy))\n\nSled(broddy, vladamir)\n\nforall x (Offhanded(x) -> Sled(x, vladamir)) <- forall x (Sled(x, broddy) -> Offhanded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The thomasina biff the mariya. The mariya is plethoric. If the thomasina is yemeni and the thomasina biff the mariya then the thomasina preexist the mariya. If something is yemeni then it biff the thomasina. If something preexist the mariya then it preexist the thomasina. If the thomasina is yemeni then the thomasina biff the mariya. If something is plethoric and wakeful then it preexist the thomasina. If something biff the mariya then it is yemeni. If something preexist the mariya then it is wakeful. If something preexist the thomasina then the thomasina whack the mariya. The thomasina is not rough.", "logic": "\nBiff(thomasina, mariya)\nPlethoric(mariya)\nYemeni(thomasina) and Biff(thomasina, mariya) -> Preexist(thomasina, mariya)\nforall x (Yemeni(x) -> Biff(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Preexist(x, mariya) -> Preexist(x, thomasina))\nYemeni(thomasina) -> Biff(thomasina, mariya)\nforall x (Plethoric(x) and Wakeful(x) -> Preexist(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Biff(x, mariya) -> Yemeni(x))\nforall x (Preexist(x, mariya) -> Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Preexist(x, thomasina) -> Whack(thomasina, mariya))\n\nnot Rough(thomasina)\n\nnot Rough(thomasina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The andriette pare the wyndham. The wyndham is enhancive. If the andriette is zymoid and the andriette pare the wyndham then the andriette thaw the wyndham. If something is zymoid then it pare the andriette. If something thaw the wyndham then it thaw the andriette. If the andriette is zymoid then the andriette pare the wyndham. If something is enhancive and collected then it thaw the andriette. If something pare the wyndham then it is zymoid. If something thaw the wyndham then it is collected. If something thaw the andriette then the andriette fistfight the wyndham. The wyndham fistfight the andriette.", "logic": "\nPare(andriette, wyndham)\nEnhancive(wyndham)\nZymoid(andriette) and Pare(andriette, wyndham) -> Thaw(andriette, wyndham)\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Pare(x, andriette))\nforall x (Thaw(x, wyndham) -> Thaw(x, andriette))\nZymoid(andriette) -> Pare(andriette, wyndham)\nforall x (Enhancive(x) and Collected(x) -> Thaw(x, andriette))\nforall x (Pare(x, wyndham) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Thaw(x, wyndham) -> Collected(x))\nforall x (Thaw(x, andriette) -> Fistfight(andriette, wyndham))\n\nFistfight(wyndham, andriette)\n\nFistfight(wyndham, andriette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The laird tighten the olympe. The olympe is bibbed. If the laird is lawful and the laird tighten the olympe then the laird sigh the olympe. If something is lawful then it tighten the laird. If something sigh the olympe then it sigh the laird. If the laird is lawful then the laird tighten the olympe. If something is bibbed and miniscule then it sigh the laird. If something tighten the olympe then it is lawful. If something sigh the olympe then it is miniscule. If something sigh the laird then the laird stockade the olympe. The laird is not bibbed.", "logic": "\nTighten(laird, olympe)\nBibbed(olympe)\nLawful(laird) and Tighten(laird, olympe) -> Sigh(laird, olympe)\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> Tighten(x, laird))\nforall x (Sigh(x, olympe) -> Sigh(x, laird))\nLawful(laird) -> Tighten(laird, olympe)\nforall x (Bibbed(x) and Miniscule(x) -> Sigh(x, laird))\nforall x (Tighten(x, olympe) -> Lawful(x))\nforall x (Sigh(x, olympe) -> Miniscule(x))\nforall x (Sigh(x, laird) -> Stockade(laird, olympe))\n\nnot Bibbed(laird)\n\nnot Bibbed(laird) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The rosemarie exuberate the eloise. The eloise is mouthlike. If the rosemarie is eudaemonic and the rosemarie exuberate the eloise then the rosemarie lucubrate the eloise. If something is eudaemonic then it exuberate the rosemarie. If something lucubrate the eloise then it lucubrate the rosemarie. If the rosemarie is eudaemonic then the rosemarie exuberate the eloise. If something is mouthlike and ruinous then it lucubrate the rosemarie. If something exuberate the eloise then it is eudaemonic. If something lucubrate the eloise then it is ruinous. If something lucubrate the rosemarie then the rosemarie pant the eloise. The eloise is round.", "logic": "\nExuberate(rosemarie, eloise)\nMouthlike(eloise)\nEudaemonic(rosemarie) and Exuberate(rosemarie, eloise) -> Lucubrate(rosemarie, eloise)\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Exuberate(x, rosemarie))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, eloise) -> Lucubrate(x, rosemarie))\nEudaemonic(rosemarie) -> Exuberate(rosemarie, eloise)\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) and Ruinous(x) -> Lucubrate(x, rosemarie))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, eloise) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, eloise) -> Ruinous(x))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, rosemarie) -> Pant(rosemarie, eloise))\n\nRound(eloise)\n\nRound(eloise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The tull gossip the hanny. The hanny is billiard. If something gossip the hanny then the hanny sidetrack the tull. If something sidetrack the tull then it gossip the tull. If something sidetrack the tull then the tull is extempore. If something unfrock the tull and the tull is not aphotic then it sidetrack the hanny. If something is infallible then it does not eat the hanny. If the tull unfrock the hanny and the hanny sidetrack the tull then the tull sidetrack the hanny. If the tull is extempore then the tull sidetrack the hanny. If something sidetrack the hanny and it does not eat the tull then it does not need the hanny. The hanny is billiard.", "logic": "\nGossip(tull, hanny)\nBilliard(hanny)\nforall x (Gossip(x, hanny) -> Sidetrack(hanny, tull))\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, tull) -> Gossip(x, tull))\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, tull) -> Extempore(tull))\nforall x (Unfrock(x, tull) and not Aphotic(tull) -> Sidetrack(x, hanny))\nforall x (Infallible(x) -> not Gossip(x, hanny))\nUnfrock(tull, hanny) and Sidetrack(hanny, tull) -> Sidetrack(tull, hanny)\nExtempore(tull) -> Sidetrack(tull, hanny)\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, hanny) and not Gossip(x, tull) -> not Unfrock(x, hanny))\n\nBilliard(hanny)\n\ntherefore Billiard(hanny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The angelita bedamn the caryn. The caryn is sheeny. If something bedamn the caryn then the caryn rear the angelita. If something rear the angelita then it bedamn the angelita. If something rear the angelita then the angelita is unfastened. If something quicken the angelita and the angelita is not bruneian then it rear the caryn. If something is unfretted then it does not eat the caryn. If the angelita quicken the caryn and the caryn rear the angelita then the angelita rear the caryn. If the angelita is unfastened then the angelita rear the caryn. If something rear the caryn and it does not eat the angelita then it does not need the caryn. The angelita does not eat the caryn.", "logic": "\nBedamn(angelita, caryn)\nSheeny(caryn)\nforall x (Bedamn(x, caryn) -> Rear(caryn, angelita))\nforall x (Rear(x, angelita) -> Bedamn(x, angelita))\nforall x (Rear(x, angelita) -> Unfastened(angelita))\nforall x (Quicken(x, angelita) and not Bruneian(angelita) -> Rear(x, caryn))\nforall x (Unfretted(x) -> not Bedamn(x, caryn))\nQuicken(angelita, caryn) and Rear(caryn, angelita) -> Rear(angelita, caryn)\nUnfastened(angelita) -> Rear(angelita, caryn)\nforall x (Rear(x, caryn) and not Bedamn(x, angelita) -> not Quicken(x, caryn))\n\nnot Bedamn(angelita, caryn)\n\ntherefore Bedamn(angelita, caryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The hilda utilise the willem. The willem is urceolate. If something utilise the willem then the willem embargo the hilda. If something embargo the hilda then it utilise the hilda. If something embargo the hilda then the hilda is multilevel. If something resile the hilda and the hilda is not throaty then it embargo the willem. If something is temptable then it does not eat the willem. If the hilda resile the willem and the willem embargo the hilda then the hilda embargo the willem. If the hilda is multilevel then the hilda embargo the willem. If something embargo the willem and it does not eat the hilda then it does not need the willem. The willem embargo the hilda.", "logic": "\nUtilise(hilda, willem)\nUrceolate(willem)\nforall x (Utilise(x, willem) -> Embargo(willem, hilda))\nforall x (Embargo(x, hilda) -> Utilise(x, hilda))\nforall x (Embargo(x, hilda) -> Multilevel(hilda))\nforall x (Resile(x, hilda) and not Throaty(hilda) -> Embargo(x, willem))\nforall x (Temptable(x) -> not Utilise(x, willem))\nResile(hilda, willem) and Embargo(willem, hilda) -> Embargo(hilda, willem)\nMultilevel(hilda) -> Embargo(hilda, willem)\nforall x (Embargo(x, willem) and not Utilise(x, hilda) -> not Resile(x, willem))\n\nEmbargo(willem, hilda)\n\nUtilise(hilda, willem) and forall x (Utilise(x, willem) -> Embargo(willem, hilda)) -> therefore Embargo(willem, hilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The hedi polemicise the winslow. The winslow is thorough. If something polemicise the winslow then the winslow loom the hedi. If something loom the hedi then it polemicise the hedi. If something loom the hedi then the hedi is eldest. If something antedate the hedi and the hedi is not unforceful then it loom the winslow. If something is unreliable then it does not eat the winslow. If the hedi antedate the winslow and the winslow loom the hedi then the hedi loom the winslow. If the hedi is eldest then the hedi loom the winslow. If something loom the winslow and it does not eat the hedi then it does not need the winslow. The winslow does not see the hedi.", "logic": "\nPolemicise(hedi, winslow)\nThorough(winslow)\nforall x (Polemicise(x, winslow) -> Loom(winslow, hedi))\nforall x (Loom(x, hedi) -> Polemicise(x, hedi))\nforall x (Loom(x, hedi) -> Eldest(hedi))\nforall x (Antedate(x, hedi) and not Unforceful(hedi) -> Loom(x, winslow))\nforall x (Unreliable(x) -> not Polemicise(x, winslow))\nAntedate(hedi, winslow) and Loom(winslow, hedi) -> Loom(hedi, winslow)\nEldest(hedi) -> Loom(hedi, winslow)\nforall x (Loom(x, winslow) and not Polemicise(x, hedi) -> not Antedate(x, winslow))\n\nnot Loom(winslow, hedi)\n\nPolemicise(hedi, winslow) and forall x (Polemicise(x, winslow) -> Loom(winslow, hedi)) -> therefore Loom(winslow, hedi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The aube decontrol the natassia. The natassia is willing. If something decontrol the natassia then the natassia chirr the aube. If something chirr the aube then it decontrol the aube. If something chirr the aube then the aube is unattended. If something lambaste the aube and the aube is not amphibian then it chirr the natassia. If something is damning then it does not eat the natassia. If the aube lambaste the natassia and the natassia chirr the aube then the aube chirr the natassia. If the aube is unattended then the aube chirr the natassia. If something chirr the natassia and it does not eat the aube then it does not need the natassia. The natassia decontrol the aube.", "logic": "\nDecontrol(aube, natassia)\nWilling(natassia)\nforall x (Decontrol(x, natassia) -> Chirr(natassia, aube))\nforall x (Chirr(x, aube) -> Decontrol(x, aube))\nforall x (Chirr(x, aube) -> Unattended(aube))\nforall x (Lambaste(x, aube) and not Amphibian(aube) -> Chirr(x, natassia))\nforall x (Damning(x) -> not Decontrol(x, natassia))\nLambaste(aube, natassia) and Chirr(natassia, aube) -> Chirr(aube, natassia)\nUnattended(aube) -> Chirr(aube, natassia)\nforall x (Chirr(x, natassia) and not Decontrol(x, aube) -> not Lambaste(x, natassia))\n\nDecontrol(natassia, aube)\n\nDecontrol(aube, natassia) and forall x (Decontrol(x, natassia) -> Chirr(natassia, aube)) -> therefore Chirr(natassia, aube) Chirr(natassia, aube) and forall x (Chirr(x, aube) -> Decontrol(x, aube)) -> therefore Decontrol(natassia, aube)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The saul transit the ludvig. The ludvig is antitypic. If something transit the ludvig then the ludvig chatter the saul. If something chatter the saul then it transit the saul. If something chatter the saul then the saul is gemmed. If something foreknow the saul and the saul is not dutiable then it chatter the ludvig. If something is futile then it does not eat the ludvig. If the saul foreknow the ludvig and the ludvig chatter the saul then the saul chatter the ludvig. If the saul is gemmed then the saul chatter the ludvig. If something chatter the ludvig and it does not eat the saul then it does not need the ludvig. The ludvig does not eat the saul.", "logic": "\nTransit(saul, ludvig)\nAntitypic(ludvig)\nforall x (Transit(x, ludvig) -> Chatter(ludvig, saul))\nforall x (Chatter(x, saul) -> Transit(x, saul))\nforall x (Chatter(x, saul) -> Gemmed(saul))\nforall x (Foreknow(x, saul) and not Dutiable(saul) -> Chatter(x, ludvig))\nforall x (Futile(x) -> not Transit(x, ludvig))\nForeknow(saul, ludvig) and Chatter(ludvig, saul) -> Chatter(saul, ludvig)\nGemmed(saul) -> Chatter(saul, ludvig)\nforall x (Chatter(x, ludvig) and not Transit(x, saul) -> not Foreknow(x, ludvig))\n\nnot Transit(ludvig, saul)\n\nTransit(saul, ludvig) and forall x (Transit(x, ludvig) -> Chatter(ludvig, saul)) -> therefore Chatter(ludvig, saul) Chatter(ludvig, saul) and forall x (Chatter(x, saul) -> Transit(x, saul)) -> therefore Transit(ludvig, saul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The wrennie dehydrate the marybeth. The marybeth is fried. If something dehydrate the marybeth then the marybeth didder the wrennie. If something didder the wrennie then it dehydrate the wrennie. If something didder the wrennie then the wrennie is injurious. If something chant the wrennie and the wrennie is not stomachic then it didder the marybeth. If something is sublimated then it does not eat the marybeth. If the wrennie chant the marybeth and the marybeth didder the wrennie then the wrennie didder the marybeth. If the wrennie is injurious then the wrennie didder the marybeth. If something didder the marybeth and it does not eat the wrennie then it does not need the marybeth. The wrennie didder the marybeth.", "logic": "\nDehydrate(wrennie, marybeth)\nFried(marybeth)\nforall x (Dehydrate(x, marybeth) -> Didder(marybeth, wrennie))\nforall x (Didder(x, wrennie) -> Dehydrate(x, wrennie))\nforall x (Didder(x, wrennie) -> Injurious(wrennie))\nforall x (Chant(x, wrennie) and not Stomachic(wrennie) -> Didder(x, marybeth))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> not Dehydrate(x, marybeth))\nChant(wrennie, marybeth) and Didder(marybeth, wrennie) -> Didder(wrennie, marybeth)\nInjurious(wrennie) -> Didder(wrennie, marybeth)\nforall x (Didder(x, marybeth) and not Dehydrate(x, wrennie) -> not Chant(x, marybeth))\n\nDidder(wrennie, marybeth)\n\nDehydrate(wrennie, marybeth) and forall x (Dehydrate(x, marybeth) -> Didder(marybeth, wrennie)) -> therefore Didder(marybeth, wrennie) Didder(marybeth, wrennie) and forall x (Didder(x, wrennie) -> Injurious(wrennie)) -> therefore Injurious(wrennie) Injurious(wrennie) and Injurious(wrennie) -> Didder(wrennie, marybeth) -> therefore Didder(wrennie, marybeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The ilene shun the rolf. The rolf is springlike. If something shun the rolf then the rolf epitomize the ilene. If something epitomize the ilene then it shun the ilene. If something epitomize the ilene then the ilene is jowly. If something roof the ilene and the ilene is not diluvian then it epitomize the rolf. If something is bluff then it does not eat the rolf. If the ilene roof the rolf and the rolf epitomize the ilene then the ilene epitomize the rolf. If the ilene is jowly then the ilene epitomize the rolf. If something epitomize the rolf and it does not eat the ilene then it does not need the rolf. The ilene does not see the rolf.", "logic": "\nShun(ilene, rolf)\nSpringlike(rolf)\nforall x (Shun(x, rolf) -> Epitomize(rolf, ilene))\nforall x (Epitomize(x, ilene) -> Shun(x, ilene))\nforall x (Epitomize(x, ilene) -> Jowly(ilene))\nforall x (Roof(x, ilene) and not Diluvian(ilene) -> Epitomize(x, rolf))\nforall x (Bluff(x) -> not Shun(x, rolf))\nRoof(ilene, rolf) and Epitomize(rolf, ilene) -> Epitomize(ilene, rolf)\nJowly(ilene) -> Epitomize(ilene, rolf)\nforall x (Epitomize(x, rolf) and not Shun(x, ilene) -> not Roof(x, rolf))\n\nnot Epitomize(ilene, rolf)\n\nShun(ilene, rolf) and forall x (Shun(x, rolf) -> Epitomize(rolf, ilene)) -> therefore Epitomize(rolf, ilene) Epitomize(rolf, ilene) and forall x (Epitomize(x, ilene) -> Jowly(ilene)) -> therefore Jowly(ilene) Jowly(ilene) and Jowly(ilene) -> Epitomize(ilene, rolf) -> therefore Epitomize(ilene, rolf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The giff embrangle the sher. The sher is cherty. If something embrangle the sher then the sher purchase the giff. If something purchase the giff then it embrangle the giff. If something purchase the giff then the giff is suppressed. If something tink the giff and the giff is not heraldic then it purchase the sher. If something is incitive then it does not eat the sher. If the giff tink the sher and the sher purchase the giff then the giff purchase the sher. If the giff is suppressed then the giff purchase the sher. If something purchase the sher and it does not eat the giff then it does not need the sher. The giff does not eat the giff.", "logic": "\nEmbrangle(giff, sher)\nCherty(sher)\nforall x (Embrangle(x, sher) -> Purchase(sher, giff))\nforall x (Purchase(x, giff) -> Embrangle(x, giff))\nforall x (Purchase(x, giff) -> Suppressed(giff))\nforall x (Tink(x, giff) and not Heraldic(giff) -> Purchase(x, sher))\nforall x (Incitive(x) -> not Embrangle(x, sher))\nTink(giff, sher) and Purchase(sher, giff) -> Purchase(giff, sher)\nSuppressed(giff) -> Purchase(giff, sher)\nforall x (Purchase(x, sher) and not Embrangle(x, giff) -> not Tink(x, sher))\n\nnot Embrangle(giff, giff)\n\nforall x (Purchase(x, giff) -> Embrangle(x, giff)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The flossi engraft the oliy. The oliy is bimotored. If something engraft the oliy then the oliy vote the flossi. If something vote the flossi then it engraft the flossi. If something vote the flossi then the flossi is turbinate. If something expatriate the flossi and the flossi is not unfearing then it vote the oliy. If something is bengali then it does not eat the oliy. If the flossi expatriate the oliy and the oliy vote the flossi then the flossi vote the oliy. If the flossi is turbinate then the flossi vote the oliy. If something vote the oliy and it does not eat the flossi then it does not need the oliy. The oliy vote the oliy.", "logic": "\nEngraft(flossi, oliy)\nBimotored(oliy)\nforall x (Engraft(x, oliy) -> Vote(oliy, flossi))\nforall x (Vote(x, flossi) -> Engraft(x, flossi))\nforall x (Vote(x, flossi) -> Turbinate(flossi))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, flossi) and not Unfearing(flossi) -> Vote(x, oliy))\nforall x (Bengali(x) -> not Engraft(x, oliy))\nExpatriate(flossi, oliy) and Vote(oliy, flossi) -> Vote(flossi, oliy)\nTurbinate(flossi) -> Vote(flossi, oliy)\nforall x (Vote(x, oliy) and not Engraft(x, flossi) -> not Expatriate(x, oliy))\n\nVote(oliy, oliy)\n\nforall x (Expatriate(x, flossi) and not Unfearing(flossi) -> Vote(x, oliy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The allen amass the barbi. The barbi is peninsular. If something amass the barbi then the barbi struggle the allen. If something struggle the allen then it amass the allen. If something struggle the allen then the allen is nullified. If something corrode the allen and the allen is not polite then it struggle the barbi. If something is gradual then it does not eat the barbi. If the allen corrode the barbi and the barbi struggle the allen then the allen struggle the barbi. If the allen is nullified then the allen struggle the barbi. If something struggle the barbi and it does not eat the allen then it does not need the barbi. The barbi does not eat the barbi.", "logic": "\nAmass(allen, barbi)\nPeninsular(barbi)\nforall x (Amass(x, barbi) -> Struggle(barbi, allen))\nforall x (Struggle(x, allen) -> Amass(x, allen))\nforall x (Struggle(x, allen) -> Nullified(allen))\nforall x (Corrode(x, allen) and not Polite(allen) -> Struggle(x, barbi))\nforall x (Gradual(x) -> not Amass(x, barbi))\nCorrode(allen, barbi) and Struggle(barbi, allen) -> Struggle(allen, barbi)\nNullified(allen) -> Struggle(allen, barbi)\nforall x (Struggle(x, barbi) and not Amass(x, allen) -> not Corrode(x, barbi))\n\nnot Amass(barbi, barbi)\n\nnot Amass(barbi, barbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The ainslee trek the rudyard. The rudyard is stringent. If something trek the rudyard then the rudyard summon the ainslee. If something summon the ainslee then it trek the ainslee. If something summon the ainslee then the ainslee is eucaryotic. If something hive the ainslee and the ainslee is not endogamic then it summon the rudyard. If something is medullary then it does not eat the rudyard. If the ainslee hive the rudyard and the rudyard summon the ainslee then the ainslee summon the rudyard. If the ainslee is eucaryotic then the ainslee summon the rudyard. If something summon the rudyard and it does not eat the ainslee then it does not need the rudyard. The ainslee hive the rudyard.", "logic": "\nTrek(ainslee, rudyard)\nStringent(rudyard)\nforall x (Trek(x, rudyard) -> Summon(rudyard, ainslee))\nforall x (Summon(x, ainslee) -> Trek(x, ainslee))\nforall x (Summon(x, ainslee) -> Eucaryotic(ainslee))\nforall x (Hive(x, ainslee) and not Endogamic(ainslee) -> Summon(x, rudyard))\nforall x (Medullary(x) -> not Trek(x, rudyard))\nHive(ainslee, rudyard) and Summon(rudyard, ainslee) -> Summon(ainslee, rudyard)\nEucaryotic(ainslee) -> Summon(ainslee, rudyard)\nforall x (Summon(x, rudyard) and not Trek(x, ainslee) -> not Hive(x, rudyard))\n\nHive(ainslee, rudyard)\n\nHive(ainslee, rudyard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The collete mouth the sharai. The sharai is tiled. If something mouth the sharai then the sharai reallocate the collete. If something reallocate the collete then it mouth the collete. If something reallocate the collete then the collete is unstinting. If something birdnest the collete and the collete is not gabonese then it reallocate the sharai. If something is briary then it does not eat the sharai. If the collete birdnest the sharai and the sharai reallocate the collete then the collete reallocate the sharai. If the collete is unstinting then the collete reallocate the sharai. If something reallocate the sharai and it does not eat the collete then it does not need the sharai. The collete is not briary.", "logic": "\nMouth(collete, sharai)\nTiled(sharai)\nforall x (Mouth(x, sharai) -> Reallocate(sharai, collete))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, collete) -> Mouth(x, collete))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, collete) -> Unstinting(collete))\nforall x (Birdnest(x, collete) and not Gabonese(collete) -> Reallocate(x, sharai))\nforall x (Briary(x) -> not Mouth(x, sharai))\nBirdnest(collete, sharai) and Reallocate(sharai, collete) -> Reallocate(collete, sharai)\nUnstinting(collete) -> Reallocate(collete, sharai)\nforall x (Reallocate(x, sharai) and not Mouth(x, collete) -> not Birdnest(x, sharai))\n\nnot Briary(collete)\n\nnot Briary(collete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The joice knife the vinod. The vinod is patient. If something knife the vinod then the vinod cobble the joice. If something cobble the joice then it knife the joice. If something cobble the joice then the joice is cybernetic. If something formalize the joice and the joice is not proud then it cobble the vinod. If something is motherlike then it does not eat the vinod. If the joice formalize the vinod and the vinod cobble the joice then the joice cobble the vinod. If the joice is cybernetic then the joice cobble the vinod. If something cobble the vinod and it does not eat the joice then it does not need the vinod. The vinod is proud.", "logic": "\nKnife(joice, vinod)\nPatient(vinod)\nforall x (Knife(x, vinod) -> Cobble(vinod, joice))\nforall x (Cobble(x, joice) -> Knife(x, joice))\nforall x (Cobble(x, joice) -> Cybernetic(joice))\nforall x (Formalize(x, joice) and not Proud(joice) -> Cobble(x, vinod))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> not Knife(x, vinod))\nFormalize(joice, vinod) and Cobble(vinod, joice) -> Cobble(joice, vinod)\nCybernetic(joice) -> Cobble(joice, vinod)\nforall x (Cobble(x, vinod) and not Knife(x, joice) -> not Formalize(x, vinod))\n\nProud(vinod)\n\nProud(vinod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The alfie flush the demetri. The demetri is imminent. If something flush the demetri then the demetri pretermit the alfie. If something pretermit the alfie then it flush the alfie. If something pretermit the alfie then the alfie is thousand. If something chip the alfie and the alfie is not dissident then it pretermit the demetri. If something is waterless then it does not eat the demetri. If the alfie chip the demetri and the demetri pretermit the alfie then the alfie pretermit the demetri. If the alfie is thousand then the alfie pretermit the demetri. If something pretermit the demetri and it does not eat the alfie then it does not need the demetri. The demetri does not need the demetri.", "logic": "\nFlush(alfie, demetri)\nImminent(demetri)\nforall x (Flush(x, demetri) -> Pretermit(demetri, alfie))\nforall x (Pretermit(x, alfie) -> Flush(x, alfie))\nforall x (Pretermit(x, alfie) -> Thousand(alfie))\nforall x (Chip(x, alfie) and not Dissident(alfie) -> Pretermit(x, demetri))\nforall x (Waterless(x) -> not Flush(x, demetri))\nChip(alfie, demetri) and Pretermit(demetri, alfie) -> Pretermit(alfie, demetri)\nThousand(alfie) -> Pretermit(alfie, demetri)\nforall x (Pretermit(x, demetri) and not Flush(x, alfie) -> not Chip(x, demetri))\n\nnot Chip(demetri, demetri)\n\nnot Chip(demetri, demetri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The susie extend the jemmie. The jemmie is biographic. If something extend the jemmie then the jemmie redden the susie. If something redden the susie then it extend the susie. If something redden the susie then the susie is lunar. If something kibitz the susie and the susie is not directed then it redden the jemmie. If something is cockamamie then it does not eat the jemmie. If the susie kibitz the jemmie and the jemmie redden the susie then the susie redden the jemmie. If the susie is lunar then the susie redden the jemmie. If something redden the jemmie and it does not eat the susie then it does not need the jemmie. The jemmie is kind.", "logic": "\nExtend(susie, jemmie)\nBiographic(jemmie)\nforall x (Extend(x, jemmie) -> Redden(jemmie, susie))\nforall x (Redden(x, susie) -> Extend(x, susie))\nforall x (Redden(x, susie) -> Lunar(susie))\nforall x (Kibitz(x, susie) and not Directed(susie) -> Redden(x, jemmie))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) -> not Extend(x, jemmie))\nKibitz(susie, jemmie) and Redden(jemmie, susie) -> Redden(susie, jemmie)\nLunar(susie) -> Redden(susie, jemmie)\nforall x (Redden(x, jemmie) and not Extend(x, susie) -> not Kibitz(x, jemmie))\n\nKind(jemmie)\n\nKind(jemmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "Piotr is probatory. Piotr is iambic. Piotr is senior. Piotr is appointed. Piotr is gloved. Piotr is rhodesian. Alan is fogbound. Alan is iambic. Alan is gloved. Dannie is not fogbound. Dannie is probatory. Dannie is iambic. Dannie is senior. Dannie is not appointed. Dannie is gloved. Dannie is rhodesian. If someone is gloved and fogbound then they are probatory. If Alan is gloved then Alan is appointed. If Alan is gloved and Alan is appointed then Alan is fogbound. If Alan is rhodesian then Alan is not senior. All probatory people are rhodesian. If someone is gloved and not probatory then they are rhodesian. Piotr is probatory.", "logic": "\nProbatory(piotr)\nIambic(piotr)\nSenior(piotr)\nAppointed(piotr)\nGloved(piotr)\nRhodesian(piotr)\nFogbound(alan)\nIambic(alan)\nGloved(alan)\nnot Fogbound(dannie)\nProbatory(dannie)\nIambic(dannie)\nSenior(dannie)\nnot Appointed(dannie)\nGloved(dannie)\nRhodesian(dannie)\nforall x (Gloved(x) and Fogbound(x) -> Probatory(x))\nGloved(alan) -> Appointed(alan)\nGloved(alan) and Appointed(alan) -> Fogbound(alan)\nRhodesian(alan) -> not Senior(alan)\nforall x (Probatory(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\nforall x (Gloved(x) and not Probatory(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\n\nProbatory(piotr)\n\ntherefore Probatory(piotr)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Marcel is bumptious. Marcel is canicular. Marcel is quechuan. Marcel is scarce. Marcel is hooklike. Marcel is incoherent. Ambros is abominable. Ambros is canicular. Ambros is hooklike. Daisey is not abominable. Daisey is bumptious. Daisey is canicular. Daisey is quechuan. Daisey is not scarce. Daisey is hooklike. Daisey is incoherent. If someone is hooklike and abominable then they are bumptious. If Ambros is hooklike then Ambros is scarce. If Ambros is hooklike and Ambros is scarce then Ambros is abominable. If Ambros is incoherent then Ambros is not quechuan. All bumptious people are incoherent. If someone is hooklike and not bumptious then they are incoherent. Marcel is not bumptious.", "logic": "\nBumptious(marcel)\nCanicular(marcel)\nQuechuan(marcel)\nScarce(marcel)\nHooklike(marcel)\nIncoherent(marcel)\nAbominable(ambros)\nCanicular(ambros)\nHooklike(ambros)\nnot Abominable(daisey)\nBumptious(daisey)\nCanicular(daisey)\nQuechuan(daisey)\nnot Scarce(daisey)\nHooklike(daisey)\nIncoherent(daisey)\nforall x (Hooklike(x) and Abominable(x) -> Bumptious(x))\nHooklike(ambros) -> Scarce(ambros)\nHooklike(ambros) and Scarce(ambros) -> Abominable(ambros)\nIncoherent(ambros) -> not Quechuan(ambros)\nforall x (Bumptious(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Hooklike(x) and not Bumptious(x) -> Incoherent(x))\n\nnot Bumptious(marcel)\n\ntherefore Bumptious(marcel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Zach is superlunar. Zach is astute. Zach is benign. Zach is capacious. Zach is gladdened. Zach is protozoal. Shayne is thriving. Shayne is astute. Shayne is gladdened. Gabriel is not thriving. Gabriel is superlunar. Gabriel is astute. Gabriel is benign. Gabriel is not capacious. Gabriel is gladdened. Gabriel is protozoal. If someone is gladdened and thriving then they are superlunar. If Shayne is gladdened then Shayne is capacious. If Shayne is gladdened and Shayne is capacious then Shayne is thriving. If Shayne is protozoal then Shayne is not benign. All superlunar people are protozoal. If someone is gladdened and not superlunar then they are protozoal. Shayne is superlunar.", "logic": "\nSuperlunar(zach)\nAstute(zach)\nBenign(zach)\nCapacious(zach)\nGladdened(zach)\nProtozoal(zach)\nThriving(shayne)\nAstute(shayne)\nGladdened(shayne)\nnot Thriving(gabriel)\nSuperlunar(gabriel)\nAstute(gabriel)\nBenign(gabriel)\nnot Capacious(gabriel)\nGladdened(gabriel)\nProtozoal(gabriel)\nforall x (Gladdened(x) and Thriving(x) -> Superlunar(x))\nGladdened(shayne) -> Capacious(shayne)\nGladdened(shayne) and Capacious(shayne) -> Thriving(shayne)\nProtozoal(shayne) -> not Benign(shayne)\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Protozoal(x))\nforall x (Gladdened(x) and not Superlunar(x) -> Protozoal(x))\n\nSuperlunar(shayne)\n\nGladdened(shayne) and Thriving(shayne) and forall x (Gladdened(x) and Thriving(x) -> Superlunar(x)) -> therefore Superlunar(shayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Woochang is embryotic. Woochang is sober. Woochang is documental. Woochang is pneumatic. Woochang is quintuple. Woochang is estranging. Gwenni is excited. Gwenni is sober. Gwenni is quintuple. Eilis is not excited. Eilis is embryotic. Eilis is sober. Eilis is documental. Eilis is not pneumatic. Eilis is quintuple. Eilis is estranging. If someone is quintuple and excited then they are embryotic. If Gwenni is quintuple then Gwenni is pneumatic. If Gwenni is quintuple and Gwenni is pneumatic then Gwenni is excited. If Gwenni is estranging then Gwenni is not documental. All embryotic people are estranging. If someone is quintuple and not embryotic then they are estranging. Gwenni is not pneumatic.", "logic": "\nEmbryotic(woochang)\nSober(woochang)\nDocumental(woochang)\nPneumatic(woochang)\nQuintuple(woochang)\nEstranging(woochang)\nExcited(gwenni)\nSober(gwenni)\nQuintuple(gwenni)\nnot Excited(eilis)\nEmbryotic(eilis)\nSober(eilis)\nDocumental(eilis)\nnot Pneumatic(eilis)\nQuintuple(eilis)\nEstranging(eilis)\nforall x (Quintuple(x) and Excited(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nQuintuple(gwenni) -> Pneumatic(gwenni)\nQuintuple(gwenni) and Pneumatic(gwenni) -> Excited(gwenni)\nEstranging(gwenni) -> not Documental(gwenni)\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Estranging(x))\nforall x (Quintuple(x) and not Embryotic(x) -> Estranging(x))\n\nnot Pneumatic(gwenni)\n\nQuintuple(gwenni) and Quintuple(gwenni) -> Pneumatic(gwenni) -> therefore Pneumatic(gwenni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Isaiah is anaemic. Isaiah is greek. Isaiah is streaming. Isaiah is clear. Isaiah is wailful. Isaiah is sinhala. Kamilah is minuscule. Kamilah is greek. Kamilah is wailful. Marcelia is not minuscule. Marcelia is anaemic. Marcelia is greek. Marcelia is streaming. Marcelia is not clear. Marcelia is wailful. Marcelia is sinhala. If someone is wailful and minuscule then they are anaemic. If Kamilah is wailful then Kamilah is clear. If Kamilah is wailful and Kamilah is clear then Kamilah is minuscule. If Kamilah is sinhala then Kamilah is not streaming. All anaemic people are sinhala. If someone is wailful and not anaemic then they are sinhala. Kamilah is sinhala.", "logic": "\nAnaemic(isaiah)\nGreek(isaiah)\nStreaming(isaiah)\nClear(isaiah)\nWailful(isaiah)\nSinhala(isaiah)\nMinuscule(kamilah)\nGreek(kamilah)\nWailful(kamilah)\nnot Minuscule(marcelia)\nAnaemic(marcelia)\nGreek(marcelia)\nStreaming(marcelia)\nnot Clear(marcelia)\nWailful(marcelia)\nSinhala(marcelia)\nforall x (Wailful(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Anaemic(x))\nWailful(kamilah) -> Clear(kamilah)\nWailful(kamilah) and Clear(kamilah) -> Minuscule(kamilah)\nSinhala(kamilah) -> not Streaming(kamilah)\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nforall x (Wailful(x) and not Anaemic(x) -> Sinhala(x))\n\nSinhala(kamilah)\n\nWailful(kamilah) and Minuscule(kamilah) and forall x (Wailful(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Anaemic(x)) -> therefore Anaemic(kamilah) Anaemic(kamilah) and forall x (Anaemic(x) -> Sinhala(x)) -> therefore Sinhala(kamilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Flinn is humanistic. Flinn is forlorn. Flinn is orientated. Flinn is deluxe. Flinn is uncreased. Flinn is modulated. Frederik is various. Frederik is forlorn. Frederik is uncreased. Vergil is not various. Vergil is humanistic. Vergil is forlorn. Vergil is orientated. Vergil is not deluxe. Vergil is uncreased. Vergil is modulated. If someone is uncreased and various then they are humanistic. If Frederik is uncreased then Frederik is deluxe. If Frederik is uncreased and Frederik is deluxe then Frederik is various. If Frederik is modulated then Frederik is not orientated. All humanistic people are modulated. If someone is uncreased and not humanistic then they are modulated. Frederik is not modulated.", "logic": "\nHumanistic(flinn)\nForlorn(flinn)\nOrientated(flinn)\nDeluxe(flinn)\nUncreased(flinn)\nModulated(flinn)\nVarious(frederik)\nForlorn(frederik)\nUncreased(frederik)\nnot Various(vergil)\nHumanistic(vergil)\nForlorn(vergil)\nOrientated(vergil)\nnot Deluxe(vergil)\nUncreased(vergil)\nModulated(vergil)\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Various(x) -> Humanistic(x))\nUncreased(frederik) -> Deluxe(frederik)\nUncreased(frederik) and Deluxe(frederik) -> Various(frederik)\nModulated(frederik) -> not Orientated(frederik)\nforall x (Humanistic(x) -> Modulated(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and not Humanistic(x) -> Modulated(x))\n\nnot Modulated(frederik)\n\nUncreased(frederik) and Various(frederik) and forall x (Uncreased(x) and Various(x) -> Humanistic(x)) -> therefore Humanistic(frederik) Humanistic(frederik) and forall x (Humanistic(x) -> Modulated(x)) -> therefore Modulated(frederik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Lilah is innumerous. Lilah is hominian. Lilah is sensorial. Lilah is dolourous. Lilah is knightly. Lilah is eolotropic. Carolina is nourishing. Carolina is hominian. Carolina is knightly. Kareem is not nourishing. Kareem is innumerous. Kareem is hominian. Kareem is sensorial. Kareem is not dolourous. Kareem is knightly. Kareem is eolotropic. If someone is knightly and nourishing then they are innumerous. If Carolina is knightly then Carolina is dolourous. If Carolina is knightly and Carolina is dolourous then Carolina is nourishing. If Carolina is eolotropic then Carolina is not sensorial. All innumerous people are eolotropic. If someone is knightly and not innumerous then they are eolotropic. Carolina is not sensorial.", "logic": "\nInnumerous(lilah)\nHominian(lilah)\nSensorial(lilah)\nDolourous(lilah)\nKnightly(lilah)\nEolotropic(lilah)\nNourishing(carolina)\nHominian(carolina)\nKnightly(carolina)\nnot Nourishing(kareem)\nInnumerous(kareem)\nHominian(kareem)\nSensorial(kareem)\nnot Dolourous(kareem)\nKnightly(kareem)\nEolotropic(kareem)\nforall x (Knightly(x) and Nourishing(x) -> Innumerous(x))\nKnightly(carolina) -> Dolourous(carolina)\nKnightly(carolina) and Dolourous(carolina) -> Nourishing(carolina)\nEolotropic(carolina) -> not Sensorial(carolina)\nforall x (Innumerous(x) -> Eolotropic(x))\nforall x (Knightly(x) and not Innumerous(x) -> Eolotropic(x))\n\nnot Sensorial(carolina)\n\nKnightly(carolina) and Nourishing(carolina) and forall x (Knightly(x) and Nourishing(x) -> Innumerous(x)) -> therefore Innumerous(carolina) Innumerous(carolina) and forall x (Innumerous(x) -> Eolotropic(x)) -> therefore Eolotropic(carolina) Eolotropic(carolina) and Eolotropic(carolina) -> not Sensorial(carolina) -> therefore not Sensorial(carolina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Hilda is dipylon. Hilda is misbranded. Hilda is behind. Hilda is inimical. Hilda is enatic. Hilda is lowbrowed. Pepillo is neither. Pepillo is misbranded. Pepillo is enatic. Trev is not neither. Trev is dipylon. Trev is misbranded. Trev is behind. Trev is not inimical. Trev is enatic. Trev is lowbrowed. If someone is enatic and neither then they are dipylon. If Pepillo is enatic then Pepillo is inimical. If Pepillo is enatic and Pepillo is inimical then Pepillo is neither. If Pepillo is lowbrowed then Pepillo is not behind. All dipylon people are lowbrowed. If someone is enatic and not dipylon then they are lowbrowed. Pepillo is behind.", "logic": "\nDipylon(hilda)\nMisbranded(hilda)\nBehind(hilda)\nInimical(hilda)\nEnatic(hilda)\nLowbrowed(hilda)\nNeither(pepillo)\nMisbranded(pepillo)\nEnatic(pepillo)\nnot Neither(trev)\nDipylon(trev)\nMisbranded(trev)\nBehind(trev)\nnot Inimical(trev)\nEnatic(trev)\nLowbrowed(trev)\nforall x (Enatic(x) and Neither(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nEnatic(pepillo) -> Inimical(pepillo)\nEnatic(pepillo) and Inimical(pepillo) -> Neither(pepillo)\nLowbrowed(pepillo) -> not Behind(pepillo)\nforall x (Dipylon(x) -> Lowbrowed(x))\nforall x (Enatic(x) and not Dipylon(x) -> Lowbrowed(x))\n\nBehind(pepillo)\n\nEnatic(pepillo) and Neither(pepillo) and forall x (Enatic(x) and Neither(x) -> Dipylon(x)) -> therefore Dipylon(pepillo) Dipylon(pepillo) and forall x (Dipylon(x) -> Lowbrowed(x)) -> therefore Lowbrowed(pepillo) Lowbrowed(pepillo) and Lowbrowed(pepillo) -> not Behind(pepillo) -> therefore not Behind(pepillo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Lenny is not paranasal. Lenny is drooping. Lenny is puissant. All endoergic things are cackly. White things are not drooping. If Lenny is cackly and Lenny is catabolic then Lenny is not paranasal. If Lenny is drooping and Lenny is cackly then Lenny is not catabolic. All puissant things are endoergic. Round, catabolic things are not paranasal. Furry things are paranasal. If something is puissant and not endoergic then it is not paranasal. Lenny is puissant.", "logic": "\nnot Paranasal(lenny)\nDrooping(lenny)\nPuissant(lenny)\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> Cackly(x))\nforall x (Overcast(x) -> not Drooping(x))\nCackly(lenny) and Catabolic(lenny) -> not Paranasal(lenny)\nDrooping(lenny) and Cackly(lenny) -> not Catabolic(lenny)\nforall x (Puissant(x) -> Endoergic(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) and Catabolic(x) -> not Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Catabolic(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) and not Endoergic(x) -> not Paranasal(x))\n\nPuissant(lenny)\n\ntherefore Puissant(lenny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Kaye is not judicable. Kaye is spectacled. Kaye is dehydrated. All ungracious things are benighted. White things are not spectacled. If Kaye is benighted and Kaye is masculine then Kaye is not judicable. If Kaye is spectacled and Kaye is benighted then Kaye is not masculine. All dehydrated things are ungracious. Round, masculine things are not judicable. Furry things are judicable. If something is dehydrated and not ungracious then it is not judicable. Kaye is judicable.", "logic": "\nnot Judicable(kaye)\nSpectacled(kaye)\nDehydrated(kaye)\nforall x (Ungracious(x) -> Benighted(x))\nforall x (Blithesome(x) -> not Spectacled(x))\nBenighted(kaye) and Masculine(kaye) -> not Judicable(kaye)\nSpectacled(kaye) and Benighted(kaye) -> not Masculine(kaye)\nforall x (Dehydrated(x) -> Ungracious(x))\nforall x (Dehydrated(x) and Masculine(x) -> not Judicable(x))\nforall x (Masculine(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Dehydrated(x) and not Ungracious(x) -> not Judicable(x))\n\nJudicable(kaye)\n\ntherefore not Judicable(kaye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Kim is not upstairs. Kim is ectodermal. Kim is unredeemed. All decreed things are unmannerly. White things are not ectodermal. If Kim is unmannerly and Kim is leftist then Kim is not upstairs. If Kim is ectodermal and Kim is unmannerly then Kim is not leftist. All unredeemed things are decreed. Round, leftist things are not upstairs. Furry things are upstairs. If something is unredeemed and not decreed then it is not upstairs. Kim is decreed.", "logic": "\nnot Upstairs(kim)\nEctodermal(kim)\nUnredeemed(kim)\nforall x (Decreed(x) -> Unmannerly(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) -> not Ectodermal(x))\nUnmannerly(kim) and Leftist(kim) -> not Upstairs(kim)\nEctodermal(kim) and Unmannerly(kim) -> not Leftist(kim)\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Decreed(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and Leftist(x) -> not Upstairs(x))\nforall x (Leftist(x) -> Upstairs(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and not Decreed(x) -> not Upstairs(x))\n\nDecreed(kim)\n\nUnredeemed(kim) and forall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Decreed(x)) -> therefore Decreed(kim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Alison is not xxvi. Alison is humped. Alison is undynamic. All permeable things are apolitical. White things are not humped. If Alison is apolitical and Alison is umbrella then Alison is not xxvi. If Alison is humped and Alison is apolitical then Alison is not umbrella. All undynamic things are permeable. Round, umbrella things are not xxvi. Furry things are xxvi. If something is undynamic and not permeable then it is not xxvi. Alison is not permeable.", "logic": "\nnot Xxvi(alison)\nHumped(alison)\nUndynamic(alison)\nforall x (Permeable(x) -> Apolitical(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) -> not Humped(x))\nApolitical(alison) and Umbrella(alison) -> not Xxvi(alison)\nHumped(alison) and Apolitical(alison) -> not Umbrella(alison)\nforall x (Undynamic(x) -> Permeable(x))\nforall x (Undynamic(x) and Umbrella(x) -> not Xxvi(x))\nforall x (Umbrella(x) -> Xxvi(x))\nforall x (Undynamic(x) and not Permeable(x) -> not Xxvi(x))\n\nnot Permeable(alison)\n\nUndynamic(alison) and forall x (Undynamic(x) -> Permeable(x)) -> therefore Permeable(alison)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Tobit is not leering. Tobit is scowling. Tobit is frizzy. All scalene things are toasted. White things are not scowling. If Tobit is toasted and Tobit is tweedy then Tobit is not leering. If Tobit is scowling and Tobit is toasted then Tobit is not tweedy. All frizzy things are scalene. Round, tweedy things are not leering. Furry things are leering. If something is frizzy and not scalene then it is not leering. Tobit is toasted.", "logic": "\nnot Leering(tobit)\nScowling(tobit)\nFrizzy(tobit)\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Toasted(x))\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) -> not Scowling(x))\nToasted(tobit) and Tweedy(tobit) -> not Leering(tobit)\nScowling(tobit) and Toasted(tobit) -> not Tweedy(tobit)\nforall x (Frizzy(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Frizzy(x) and Tweedy(x) -> not Leering(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Leering(x))\nforall x (Frizzy(x) and not Scalene(x) -> not Leering(x))\n\nToasted(tobit)\n\nFrizzy(tobit) and forall x (Frizzy(x) -> Scalene(x)) -> therefore Scalene(tobit) Scalene(tobit) and forall x (Scalene(x) -> Toasted(x)) -> therefore Toasted(tobit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Adelle is not noticed. Adelle is exergonic. Adelle is sarcastic. All affine things are flowing. White things are not exergonic. If Adelle is flowing and Adelle is blindfold then Adelle is not noticed. If Adelle is exergonic and Adelle is flowing then Adelle is not blindfold. All sarcastic things are affine. Round, blindfold things are not noticed. Furry things are noticed. If something is sarcastic and not affine then it is not noticed. Adelle is not flowing.", "logic": "\nnot Noticed(adelle)\nExergonic(adelle)\nSarcastic(adelle)\nforall x (Affine(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> not Exergonic(x))\nFlowing(adelle) and Blindfold(adelle) -> not Noticed(adelle)\nExergonic(adelle) and Flowing(adelle) -> not Blindfold(adelle)\nforall x (Sarcastic(x) -> Affine(x))\nforall x (Sarcastic(x) and Blindfold(x) -> not Noticed(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) -> Noticed(x))\nforall x (Sarcastic(x) and not Affine(x) -> not Noticed(x))\n\nnot Flowing(adelle)\n\nSarcastic(adelle) and forall x (Sarcastic(x) -> Affine(x)) -> therefore Affine(adelle) Affine(adelle) and forall x (Affine(x) -> Flowing(x)) -> therefore Flowing(adelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Bernadine is not merciful. Bernadine is iodinating. Bernadine is distant. All manlike things are prussian. White things are not iodinating. If Bernadine is prussian and Bernadine is mazy then Bernadine is not merciful. If Bernadine is iodinating and Bernadine is prussian then Bernadine is not mazy. All distant things are manlike. Round, mazy things are not merciful. Furry things are merciful. If something is distant and not manlike then it is not merciful. Bernadine is not mazy.", "logic": "\nnot Merciful(bernadine)\nIodinating(bernadine)\nDistant(bernadine)\nforall x (Manlike(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Beady(x) -> not Iodinating(x))\nPrussian(bernadine) and Mazy(bernadine) -> not Merciful(bernadine)\nIodinating(bernadine) and Prussian(bernadine) -> not Mazy(bernadine)\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Manlike(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) and Mazy(x) -> not Merciful(x))\nforall x (Mazy(x) -> Merciful(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) and not Manlike(x) -> not Merciful(x))\n\nnot Mazy(bernadine)\n\nDistant(bernadine) and forall x (Distant(x) -> Manlike(x)) -> therefore Manlike(bernadine) Manlike(bernadine) and forall x (Manlike(x) -> Prussian(x)) -> therefore Prussian(bernadine) Iodinating(bernadine) and Prussian(bernadine) and Iodinating(bernadine) and Prussian(bernadine) -> not Mazy(bernadine) -> therefore not Mazy(bernadine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Filide is not compelling. Filide is obliging. Filide is wifelike. All flowerless things are palpitant. White things are not obliging. If Filide is palpitant and Filide is individual then Filide is not compelling. If Filide is obliging and Filide is palpitant then Filide is not individual. All wifelike things are flowerless. Round, individual things are not compelling. Furry things are compelling. If something is wifelike and not flowerless then it is not compelling. Filide is individual.", "logic": "\nnot Compelling(filide)\nObliging(filide)\nWifelike(filide)\nforall x (Flowerless(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) -> not Obliging(x))\nPalpitant(filide) and Individual(filide) -> not Compelling(filide)\nObliging(filide) and Palpitant(filide) -> not Individual(filide)\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) and Individual(x) -> not Compelling(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) -> Compelling(x))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) and not Flowerless(x) -> not Compelling(x))\n\nIndividual(filide)\n\nWifelike(filide) and forall x (Wifelike(x) -> Flowerless(x)) -> therefore Flowerless(filide) Flowerless(filide) and forall x (Flowerless(x) -> Palpitant(x)) -> therefore Palpitant(filide) Obliging(filide) and Palpitant(filide) and Obliging(filide) and Palpitant(filide) -> not Individual(filide) -> therefore not Individual(filide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "The quigly is not recurved. The quigly concert the lacy. The quigly does not see the doralia. The lacy is subarctic. The doralia is aurous. The doralia is homosexual. The doralia concert the quigly. If something concert the lacy then the lacy forewarn the doralia. If something is subarctic then it forewarn the lacy. If the lacy is subarctic then the lacy is not recurved. If something is woody and not homosexual then it does not see the quigly. If something is recurved and it concert the doralia then the doralia forewarn the lacy. If something forewarn the doralia and it is not recurved then the doralia scamper the lacy. If something scamper the lacy then it concert the quigly. If something scamper the lacy and the lacy is subarctic then the lacy does not like the quigly. The lacy is subarctic.", "logic": "\nnot Recurved(quigly)\nConcert(quigly, lacy)\nnot Scamper(quigly, doralia)\nSubarctic(lacy)\nAurous(doralia)\nHomosexual(doralia)\nConcert(doralia, quigly)\nforall x (Concert(x, lacy) -> Forewarn(lacy, doralia))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) -> Forewarn(x, lacy))\nSubarctic(lacy) -> not Recurved(lacy)\nforall x (Woody(x) and not Homosexual(x) -> not Scamper(x, quigly))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Concert(x, doralia) -> Forewarn(doralia, lacy))\nforall x (Forewarn(x, doralia) and not Recurved(x) -> Scamper(doralia, lacy))\nforall x (Scamper(x, lacy) -> Concert(x, quigly))\nforall x (Scamper(x, lacy) and Subarctic(lacy) -> not Concert(lacy, quigly))\n\nSubarctic(lacy)\n\ntherefore Subarctic(lacy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The sibylla is not chelated. The sibylla deprecate the rozele. The sibylla does not see the andi. The rozele is pastel. The andi is overstrung. The andi is cimmerian. The andi deprecate the sibylla. If something deprecate the rozele then the rozele inventory the andi. If something is pastel then it inventory the rozele. If the rozele is pastel then the rozele is not chelated. If something is selective and not cimmerian then it does not see the sibylla. If something is chelated and it deprecate the andi then the andi inventory the rozele. If something inventory the andi and it is not chelated then the andi abandon the rozele. If something abandon the rozele then it deprecate the sibylla. If something abandon the rozele and the rozele is pastel then the rozele does not like the sibylla. The sibylla abandon the andi.", "logic": "\nnot Chelated(sibylla)\nDeprecate(sibylla, rozele)\nnot Abandon(sibylla, andi)\nPastel(rozele)\nOverstrung(andi)\nCimmerian(andi)\nDeprecate(andi, sibylla)\nforall x (Deprecate(x, rozele) -> Inventory(rozele, andi))\nforall x (Pastel(x) -> Inventory(x, rozele))\nPastel(rozele) -> not Chelated(rozele)\nforall x (Selective(x) and not Cimmerian(x) -> not Abandon(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Chelated(x) and Deprecate(x, andi) -> Inventory(andi, rozele))\nforall x (Inventory(x, andi) and not Chelated(x) -> Abandon(andi, rozele))\nforall x (Abandon(x, rozele) -> Deprecate(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Abandon(x, rozele) and Pastel(rozele) -> not Deprecate(rozele, sibylla))\n\nAbandon(sibylla, andi)\n\ntherefore not Abandon(sibylla, andi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The riccardo is not tricuspid. The riccardo freeze the ambrosius. The riccardo does not see the ignazio. The ambrosius is apocrine. The ignazio is moderato. The ignazio is rakish. The ignazio freeze the riccardo. If something freeze the ambrosius then the ambrosius prostitute the ignazio. If something is apocrine then it prostitute the ambrosius. If the ambrosius is apocrine then the ambrosius is not tricuspid. If something is shocking and not rakish then it does not see the riccardo. If something is tricuspid and it freeze the ignazio then the ignazio prostitute the ambrosius. If something prostitute the ignazio and it is not tricuspid then the ignazio humbug the ambrosius. If something humbug the ambrosius then it freeze the riccardo. If something humbug the ambrosius and the ambrosius is apocrine then the ambrosius does not like the riccardo. The ambrosius is not tricuspid.", "logic": "\nnot Tricuspid(riccardo)\nFreeze(riccardo, ambrosius)\nnot Humbug(riccardo, ignazio)\nApocrine(ambrosius)\nModerato(ignazio)\nRakish(ignazio)\nFreeze(ignazio, riccardo)\nforall x (Freeze(x, ambrosius) -> Prostitute(ambrosius, ignazio))\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> Prostitute(x, ambrosius))\nApocrine(ambrosius) -> not Tricuspid(ambrosius)\nforall x (Shocking(x) and not Rakish(x) -> not Humbug(x, riccardo))\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) and Freeze(x, ignazio) -> Prostitute(ignazio, ambrosius))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, ignazio) and not Tricuspid(x) -> Humbug(ignazio, ambrosius))\nforall x (Humbug(x, ambrosius) -> Freeze(x, riccardo))\nforall x (Humbug(x, ambrosius) and Apocrine(ambrosius) -> not Freeze(ambrosius, riccardo))\n\nnot Tricuspid(ambrosius)\n\nApocrine(ambrosius) and Apocrine(ambrosius) -> not Tricuspid(ambrosius) -> therefore not Tricuspid(ambrosius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The prisca is not katharobic. The prisca glory the beale. The prisca does not see the winifield. The beale is pacifist. The winifield is chasidic. The winifield is stygian. The winifield glory the prisca. If something glory the beale then the beale vilify the winifield. If something is pacifist then it vilify the beale. If the beale is pacifist then the beale is not katharobic. If something is agonizing and not stygian then it does not see the prisca. If something is katharobic and it glory the winifield then the winifield vilify the beale. If something vilify the winifield and it is not katharobic then the winifield airt the beale. If something airt the beale then it glory the prisca. If something airt the beale and the beale is pacifist then the beale does not like the prisca. The beale is katharobic.", "logic": "\nnot Katharobic(prisca)\nGlory(prisca, beale)\nnot Airt(prisca, winifield)\nPacifist(beale)\nChasidic(winifield)\nStygian(winifield)\nGlory(winifield, prisca)\nforall x (Glory(x, beale) -> Vilify(beale, winifield))\nforall x (Pacifist(x) -> Vilify(x, beale))\nPacifist(beale) -> not Katharobic(beale)\nforall x (Agonizing(x) and not Stygian(x) -> not Airt(x, prisca))\nforall x (Katharobic(x) and Glory(x, winifield) -> Vilify(winifield, beale))\nforall x (Vilify(x, winifield) and not Katharobic(x) -> Airt(winifield, beale))\nforall x (Airt(x, beale) -> Glory(x, prisca))\nforall x (Airt(x, beale) and Pacifist(beale) -> not Glory(beale, prisca))\n\nKatharobic(beale)\n\nPacifist(beale) and Pacifist(beale) -> not Katharobic(beale) -> therefore not Katharobic(beale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The myke is not unremarked. The myke create the corky. The myke does not see the ace. The corky is spermatic. The ace is effortful. The ace is briny. The ace create the myke. If something create the corky then the corky edify the ace. If something is spermatic then it edify the corky. If the corky is spermatic then the corky is not unremarked. If something is violet and not briny then it does not see the myke. If something is unremarked and it create the ace then the ace edify the corky. If something edify the ace and it is not unremarked then the ace nasalise the corky. If something nasalise the corky then it create the myke. If something nasalise the corky and the corky is spermatic then the corky does not like the myke. The ace nasalise the corky.", "logic": "\nnot Unremarked(myke)\nCreate(myke, corky)\nnot Nasalise(myke, ace)\nSpermatic(corky)\nEffortful(ace)\nBriny(ace)\nCreate(ace, myke)\nforall x (Create(x, corky) -> Edify(corky, ace))\nforall x (Spermatic(x) -> Edify(x, corky))\nSpermatic(corky) -> not Unremarked(corky)\nforall x (Violet(x) and not Briny(x) -> not Nasalise(x, myke))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) and Create(x, ace) -> Edify(ace, corky))\nforall x (Edify(x, ace) and not Unremarked(x) -> Nasalise(ace, corky))\nforall x (Nasalise(x, corky) -> Create(x, myke))\nforall x (Nasalise(x, corky) and Spermatic(corky) -> not Create(corky, myke))\n\nNasalise(ace, corky)\n\nCreate(myke, corky) and forall x (Create(x, corky) -> Edify(corky, ace)) -> therefore Edify(corky, ace) Spermatic(corky) and Spermatic(corky) -> not Unremarked(corky) -> therefore not Unremarked(corky) Edify(corky, ace) and not Unremarked(corky) and forall x (Edify(x, ace) and not Unremarked(x) -> Nasalise(ace, corky)) -> therefore Nasalise(ace, corky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The paloma is not clammy. The paloma party the iona. The paloma does not see the alvinia. The iona is egoistic. The alvinia is stuck. The alvinia is rhetorical. The alvinia party the paloma. If something party the iona then the iona spite the alvinia. If something is egoistic then it spite the iona. If the iona is egoistic then the iona is not clammy. If something is astir and not rhetorical then it does not see the paloma. If something is clammy and it party the alvinia then the alvinia spite the iona. If something spite the alvinia and it is not clammy then the alvinia corrugate the iona. If something corrugate the iona then it party the paloma. If something corrugate the iona and the iona is egoistic then the iona does not like the paloma. The alvinia does not see the iona.", "logic": "\nnot Clammy(paloma)\nParty(paloma, iona)\nnot Corrugate(paloma, alvinia)\nEgoistic(iona)\nStuck(alvinia)\nRhetorical(alvinia)\nParty(alvinia, paloma)\nforall x (Party(x, iona) -> Spite(iona, alvinia))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Spite(x, iona))\nEgoistic(iona) -> not Clammy(iona)\nforall x (Astir(x) and not Rhetorical(x) -> not Corrugate(x, paloma))\nforall x (Clammy(x) and Party(x, alvinia) -> Spite(alvinia, iona))\nforall x (Spite(x, alvinia) and not Clammy(x) -> Corrugate(alvinia, iona))\nforall x (Corrugate(x, iona) -> Party(x, paloma))\nforall x (Corrugate(x, iona) and Egoistic(iona) -> not Party(iona, paloma))\n\nnot Corrugate(alvinia, iona)\n\nParty(paloma, iona) and forall x (Party(x, iona) -> Spite(iona, alvinia)) -> therefore Spite(iona, alvinia) Egoistic(iona) and Egoistic(iona) -> not Clammy(iona) -> therefore not Clammy(iona) Spite(iona, alvinia) and not Clammy(iona) and forall x (Spite(x, alvinia) and not Clammy(x) -> Corrugate(alvinia, iona)) -> therefore Corrugate(alvinia, iona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The leighton is not lendable. The leighton typecast the lyndy. The leighton does not see the jada. The lyndy is plodding. The jada is angered. The jada is barometric. The jada typecast the leighton. If something typecast the lyndy then the lyndy sodomize the jada. If something is plodding then it sodomize the lyndy. If the lyndy is plodding then the lyndy is not lendable. If something is horrendous and not barometric then it does not see the leighton. If something is lendable and it typecast the jada then the jada sodomize the lyndy. If something sodomize the jada and it is not lendable then the jada render the lyndy. If something render the lyndy then it typecast the leighton. If something render the lyndy and the lyndy is plodding then the lyndy does not like the leighton. The lyndy does not like the leighton.", "logic": "\nnot Lendable(leighton)\nTypecast(leighton, lyndy)\nnot Render(leighton, jada)\nPlodding(lyndy)\nAngered(jada)\nBarometric(jada)\nTypecast(jada, leighton)\nforall x (Typecast(x, lyndy) -> Sodomize(lyndy, jada))\nforall x (Plodding(x) -> Sodomize(x, lyndy))\nPlodding(lyndy) -> not Lendable(lyndy)\nforall x (Horrendous(x) and not Barometric(x) -> not Render(x, leighton))\nforall x (Lendable(x) and Typecast(x, jada) -> Sodomize(jada, lyndy))\nforall x (Sodomize(x, jada) and not Lendable(x) -> Render(jada, lyndy))\nforall x (Render(x, lyndy) -> Typecast(x, leighton))\nforall x (Render(x, lyndy) and Plodding(lyndy) -> not Typecast(lyndy, leighton))\n\nnot Typecast(lyndy, leighton)\n\nTypecast(leighton, lyndy) and forall x (Typecast(x, lyndy) -> Sodomize(lyndy, jada)) -> therefore Sodomize(lyndy, jada) Plodding(lyndy) and Plodding(lyndy) -> not Lendable(lyndy) -> therefore not Lendable(lyndy) Sodomize(lyndy, jada) and not Lendable(lyndy) and forall x (Sodomize(x, jada) and not Lendable(x) -> Render(jada, lyndy)) -> therefore Render(jada, lyndy) Render(jada, lyndy) and Plodding(lyndy) and forall x (Render(x, lyndy) and Plodding(lyndy) -> not Typecast(lyndy, leighton)) -> therefore not Typecast(lyndy, leighton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The marybelle is not hematal. The marybelle divagate the meade. The marybelle does not see the elsinore. The meade is upward. The elsinore is poached. The elsinore is occult. The elsinore divagate the marybelle. If something divagate the meade then the meade ballast the elsinore. If something is upward then it ballast the meade. If the meade is upward then the meade is not hematal. If something is tenebrous and not occult then it does not see the marybelle. If something is hematal and it divagate the elsinore then the elsinore ballast the meade. If something ballast the elsinore and it is not hematal then the elsinore follow the meade. If something follow the meade then it divagate the marybelle. If something follow the meade and the meade is upward then the meade does not like the marybelle. The meade divagate the marybelle.", "logic": "\nnot Hematal(marybelle)\nDivagate(marybelle, meade)\nnot Follow(marybelle, elsinore)\nUpward(meade)\nPoached(elsinore)\nOccult(elsinore)\nDivagate(elsinore, marybelle)\nforall x (Divagate(x, meade) -> Ballast(meade, elsinore))\nforall x (Upward(x) -> Ballast(x, meade))\nUpward(meade) -> not Hematal(meade)\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) and not Occult(x) -> not Follow(x, marybelle))\nforall x (Hematal(x) and Divagate(x, elsinore) -> Ballast(elsinore, meade))\nforall x (Ballast(x, elsinore) and not Hematal(x) -> Follow(elsinore, meade))\nforall x (Follow(x, meade) -> Divagate(x, marybelle))\nforall x (Follow(x, meade) and Upward(meade) -> not Divagate(meade, marybelle))\n\nDivagate(meade, marybelle)\n\nDivagate(marybelle, meade) and forall x (Divagate(x, meade) -> Ballast(meade, elsinore)) -> therefore Ballast(meade, elsinore) Upward(meade) and Upward(meade) -> not Hematal(meade) -> therefore not Hematal(meade) Ballast(meade, elsinore) and not Hematal(meade) and forall x (Ballast(x, elsinore) and not Hematal(x) -> Follow(elsinore, meade)) -> therefore Follow(elsinore, meade) Follow(elsinore, meade) and Upward(meade) and forall x (Follow(x, meade) and Upward(meade) -> not Divagate(meade, marybelle)) -> therefore not Divagate(meade, marybelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The delilah is not painful. The delilah antedate the hernando. The delilah does not see the aliza. The hernando is cetaceous. The aliza is ceilinged. The aliza is bumpkinly. The aliza antedate the delilah. If something antedate the hernando then the hernando obviate the aliza. If something is cetaceous then it obviate the hernando. If the hernando is cetaceous then the hernando is not painful. If something is barren and not bumpkinly then it does not see the delilah. If something is painful and it antedate the aliza then the aliza obviate the hernando. If something obviate the aliza and it is not painful then the aliza crispen the hernando. If something crispen the hernando then it antedate the delilah. If something crispen the hernando and the hernando is cetaceous then the hernando does not like the delilah. The delilah does not eat the hernando.", "logic": "\nnot Painful(delilah)\nAntedate(delilah, hernando)\nnot Crispen(delilah, aliza)\nCetaceous(hernando)\nCeilinged(aliza)\nBumpkinly(aliza)\nAntedate(aliza, delilah)\nforall x (Antedate(x, hernando) -> Obviate(hernando, aliza))\nforall x (Cetaceous(x) -> Obviate(x, hernando))\nCetaceous(hernando) -> not Painful(hernando)\nforall x (Barren(x) and not Bumpkinly(x) -> not Crispen(x, delilah))\nforall x (Painful(x) and Antedate(x, aliza) -> Obviate(aliza, hernando))\nforall x (Obviate(x, aliza) and not Painful(x) -> Crispen(aliza, hernando))\nforall x (Crispen(x, hernando) -> Antedate(x, delilah))\nforall x (Crispen(x, hernando) and Cetaceous(hernando) -> not Antedate(hernando, delilah))\n\nnot Obviate(delilah, hernando)\n\nforall x (Cetaceous(x) -> Obviate(x, hernando)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The foster is not speakable. The foster invest the dorita. The foster does not see the winnifred. The dorita is built. The winnifred is made. The winnifred is tallish. The winnifred invest the foster. If something invest the dorita then the dorita backbite the winnifred. If something is built then it backbite the dorita. If the dorita is built then the dorita is not speakable. If something is bleached and not tallish then it does not see the foster. If something is speakable and it invest the winnifred then the winnifred backbite the dorita. If something backbite the winnifred and it is not speakable then the winnifred caution the dorita. If something caution the dorita then it invest the foster. If something caution the dorita and the dorita is built then the dorita does not like the foster. The winnifred backbite the dorita.", "logic": "\nnot Speakable(foster)\nInvest(foster, dorita)\nnot Caution(foster, winnifred)\nBuilt(dorita)\nMade(winnifred)\nTallish(winnifred)\nInvest(winnifred, foster)\nforall x (Invest(x, dorita) -> Backbite(dorita, winnifred))\nforall x (Built(x) -> Backbite(x, dorita))\nBuilt(dorita) -> not Speakable(dorita)\nforall x (Bleached(x) and not Tallish(x) -> not Caution(x, foster))\nforall x (Speakable(x) and Invest(x, winnifred) -> Backbite(winnifred, dorita))\nforall x (Backbite(x, winnifred) and not Speakable(x) -> Caution(winnifred, dorita))\nforall x (Caution(x, dorita) -> Invest(x, foster))\nforall x (Caution(x, dorita) and Built(dorita) -> not Invest(dorita, foster))\n\nBackbite(winnifred, dorita)\n\nforall x (Built(x) -> Backbite(x, dorita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The kali is not veinal. The kali allude the eadith. The kali does not see the gita. The eadith is underwater. The gita is dorsal. The gita is agile. The gita allude the kali. If something allude the eadith then the eadith indue the gita. If something is underwater then it indue the eadith. If the eadith is underwater then the eadith is not veinal. If something is xanthous and not agile then it does not see the kali. If something is veinal and it allude the gita then the gita indue the eadith. If something indue the gita and it is not veinal then the gita malign the eadith. If something malign the eadith then it allude the kali. If something malign the eadith and the eadith is underwater then the eadith does not like the kali. The kali does not like the kali.", "logic": "\nnot Veinal(kali)\nAllude(kali, eadith)\nnot Malign(kali, gita)\nUnderwater(eadith)\nDorsal(gita)\nAgile(gita)\nAllude(gita, kali)\nforall x (Allude(x, eadith) -> Indue(eadith, gita))\nforall x (Underwater(x) -> Indue(x, eadith))\nUnderwater(eadith) -> not Veinal(eadith)\nforall x (Xanthous(x) and not Agile(x) -> not Malign(x, kali))\nforall x (Veinal(x) and Allude(x, gita) -> Indue(gita, eadith))\nforall x (Indue(x, gita) and not Veinal(x) -> Malign(gita, eadith))\nforall x (Malign(x, eadith) -> Allude(x, kali))\nforall x (Malign(x, eadith) and Underwater(eadith) -> not Allude(eadith, kali))\n\nnot Allude(kali, kali)\n\nforall x (Malign(x, eadith) -> Allude(x, kali)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The gabey is not isolated. The gabey drool the taber. The gabey does not see the sabrina. The taber is flexile. The sabrina is lecherous. The sabrina is hangdog. The sabrina drool the gabey. If something drool the taber then the taber beacon the sabrina. If something is flexile then it beacon the taber. If the taber is flexile then the taber is not isolated. If something is awned and not hangdog then it does not see the gabey. If something is isolated and it drool the sabrina then the sabrina beacon the taber. If something beacon the sabrina and it is not isolated then the sabrina minify the taber. If something minify the taber then it drool the gabey. If something minify the taber and the taber is flexile then the taber does not like the gabey. The taber minify the gabey.", "logic": "\nnot Isolated(gabey)\nDrool(gabey, taber)\nnot Minify(gabey, sabrina)\nFlexile(taber)\nLecherous(sabrina)\nHangdog(sabrina)\nDrool(sabrina, gabey)\nforall x (Drool(x, taber) -> Beacon(taber, sabrina))\nforall x (Flexile(x) -> Beacon(x, taber))\nFlexile(taber) -> not Isolated(taber)\nforall x (Awned(x) and not Hangdog(x) -> not Minify(x, gabey))\nforall x (Isolated(x) and Drool(x, sabrina) -> Beacon(sabrina, taber))\nforall x (Beacon(x, sabrina) and not Isolated(x) -> Minify(sabrina, taber))\nforall x (Minify(x, taber) -> Drool(x, gabey))\nforall x (Minify(x, taber) and Flexile(taber) -> not Drool(taber, gabey))\n\nMinify(taber, gabey)\n\nMinify(taber, gabey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The maren is not uraemic. The maren nudge the rebe. The maren does not see the nertie. The rebe is maiden. The nertie is xlii. The nertie is enabling. The nertie nudge the maren. If something nudge the rebe then the rebe discourage the nertie. If something is maiden then it discourage the rebe. If the rebe is maiden then the rebe is not uraemic. If something is leftover and not enabling then it does not see the maren. If something is uraemic and it nudge the nertie then the nertie discourage the rebe. If something discourage the nertie and it is not uraemic then the nertie infiltrate the rebe. If something infiltrate the rebe then it nudge the maren. If something infiltrate the rebe and the rebe is maiden then the rebe does not like the maren. The nertie does not see the maren.", "logic": "\nnot Uraemic(maren)\nNudge(maren, rebe)\nnot Infiltrate(maren, nertie)\nMaiden(rebe)\nXlii(nertie)\nEnabling(nertie)\nNudge(nertie, maren)\nforall x (Nudge(x, rebe) -> Discourage(rebe, nertie))\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> Discourage(x, rebe))\nMaiden(rebe) -> not Uraemic(rebe)\nforall x (Leftover(x) and not Enabling(x) -> not Infiltrate(x, maren))\nforall x (Uraemic(x) and Nudge(x, nertie) -> Discourage(nertie, rebe))\nforall x (Discourage(x, nertie) and not Uraemic(x) -> Infiltrate(nertie, rebe))\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, rebe) -> Nudge(x, maren))\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, rebe) and Maiden(rebe) -> not Nudge(rebe, maren))\n\nnot Infiltrate(nertie, maren)\n\nnot Infiltrate(nertie, maren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The marshal is not unfitting. The marshal dismiss the augie. The marshal does not see the harlin. The augie is lambent. The harlin is special. The harlin is embroiled. The harlin dismiss the marshal. If something dismiss the augie then the augie tell the harlin. If something is lambent then it tell the augie. If the augie is lambent then the augie is not unfitting. If something is adulatory and not embroiled then it does not see the marshal. If something is unfitting and it dismiss the harlin then the harlin tell the augie. If something tell the harlin and it is not unfitting then the harlin exuberate the augie. If something exuberate the augie then it dismiss the marshal. If something exuberate the augie and the augie is lambent then the augie does not like the marshal. The augie is embroiled.", "logic": "\nnot Unfitting(marshal)\nDismiss(marshal, augie)\nnot Exuberate(marshal, harlin)\nLambent(augie)\nSpecial(harlin)\nEmbroiled(harlin)\nDismiss(harlin, marshal)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, augie) -> Tell(augie, harlin))\nforall x (Lambent(x) -> Tell(x, augie))\nLambent(augie) -> not Unfitting(augie)\nforall x (Adulatory(x) and not Embroiled(x) -> not Exuberate(x, marshal))\nforall x (Unfitting(x) and Dismiss(x, harlin) -> Tell(harlin, augie))\nforall x (Tell(x, harlin) and not Unfitting(x) -> Exuberate(harlin, augie))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, augie) -> Dismiss(x, marshal))\nforall x (Exuberate(x, augie) and Lambent(augie) -> not Dismiss(augie, marshal))\n\nEmbroiled(augie)\n\nEmbroiled(augie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The celestyna is not singhalese. The celestyna oscillate the phillipe. The celestyna does not see the annamaria. The phillipe is compelling. The annamaria is psychical. The annamaria is placed. The annamaria oscillate the celestyna. If something oscillate the phillipe then the phillipe sand the annamaria. If something is compelling then it sand the phillipe. If the phillipe is compelling then the phillipe is not singhalese. If something is fattening and not placed then it does not see the celestyna. If something is singhalese and it oscillate the annamaria then the annamaria sand the phillipe. If something sand the annamaria and it is not singhalese then the annamaria coiffe the phillipe. If something coiffe the phillipe then it oscillate the celestyna. If something coiffe the phillipe and the phillipe is compelling then the phillipe does not like the celestyna. The phillipe does not eat the celestyna.", "logic": "\nnot Singhalese(celestyna)\nOscillate(celestyna, phillipe)\nnot Coiffe(celestyna, annamaria)\nCompelling(phillipe)\nPsychical(annamaria)\nPlaced(annamaria)\nOscillate(annamaria, celestyna)\nforall x (Oscillate(x, phillipe) -> Sand(phillipe, annamaria))\nforall x (Compelling(x) -> Sand(x, phillipe))\nCompelling(phillipe) -> not Singhalese(phillipe)\nforall x (Fattening(x) and not Placed(x) -> not Coiffe(x, celestyna))\nforall x (Singhalese(x) and Oscillate(x, annamaria) -> Sand(annamaria, phillipe))\nforall x (Sand(x, annamaria) and not Singhalese(x) -> Coiffe(annamaria, phillipe))\nforall x (Coiffe(x, phillipe) -> Oscillate(x, celestyna))\nforall x (Coiffe(x, phillipe) and Compelling(phillipe) -> not Oscillate(phillipe, celestyna))\n\nnot Sand(phillipe, celestyna)\n\nnot Sand(phillipe, celestyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The enrico is not unfocused. The enrico scruple the weider. The enrico does not see the natalee. The weider is hindmost. The natalee is bifilar. The natalee is juicy. The natalee scruple the enrico. If something scruple the weider then the weider avalanche the natalee. If something is hindmost then it avalanche the weider. If the weider is hindmost then the weider is not unfocused. If something is nonmetal and not juicy then it does not see the enrico. If something is unfocused and it scruple the natalee then the natalee avalanche the weider. If something avalanche the natalee and it is not unfocused then the natalee hollow the weider. If something hollow the weider then it scruple the enrico. If something hollow the weider and the weider is hindmost then the weider does not like the enrico. The weider is bifilar.", "logic": "\nnot Unfocused(enrico)\nScruple(enrico, weider)\nnot Hollow(enrico, natalee)\nHindmost(weider)\nBifilar(natalee)\nJuicy(natalee)\nScruple(natalee, enrico)\nforall x (Scruple(x, weider) -> Avalanche(weider, natalee))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) -> Avalanche(x, weider))\nHindmost(weider) -> not Unfocused(weider)\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) and not Juicy(x) -> not Hollow(x, enrico))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Scruple(x, natalee) -> Avalanche(natalee, weider))\nforall x (Avalanche(x, natalee) and not Unfocused(x) -> Hollow(natalee, weider))\nforall x (Hollow(x, weider) -> Scruple(x, enrico))\nforall x (Hollow(x, weider) and Hindmost(weider) -> not Scruple(weider, enrico))\n\nBifilar(weider)\n\nBifilar(weider) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The deirdre cower the nealson. The deirdre is brinded. The deirdre is squashed. The nealson cower the deirdre. The nealson slime the deirdre. The ardelis cower the nealson. The ardelis cower the mohammed. The ardelis slime the mohammed. The mohammed cower the ardelis. The mohammed slime the ardelis. If someone slime the ardelis then they are leonine. If someone slime the ardelis and the ardelis slime the nealson then the ardelis is squashed. If someone is boxed then they chase the nealson. If someone cower the ardelis and they are leonine then the ardelis slime the deirdre. If someone slime the ardelis and they are squashed then they eat the mohammed. If someone is brinded then they eat the ardelis. If someone is leonine then they are boxed. If someone prostrate the ardelis then the ardelis slime the nealson. The mohammed slime the ardelis.", "logic": "\nCower(deirdre, nealson)\nBrinded(deirdre)\nSquashed(deirdre)\nCower(nealson, deirdre)\nSlime(nealson, deirdre)\nCower(ardelis, nealson)\nCower(ardelis, mohammed)\nSlime(ardelis, mohammed)\nCower(mohammed, ardelis)\nSlime(mohammed, ardelis)\nforall x (Slime(x, ardelis) -> Leonine(x))\nforall x (Slime(x, ardelis) and Slime(ardelis, nealson) -> Squashed(ardelis))\nforall x (Boxed(x) -> Prostrate(x, nealson))\nforall x (Cower(x, ardelis) and Leonine(x) -> Slime(ardelis, deirdre))\nforall x (Slime(x, ardelis) and Squashed(x) -> Cower(x, mohammed))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Cower(x, ardelis))\nforall x (Leonine(x) -> Boxed(x))\nforall x (Prostrate(x, ardelis) -> Slime(ardelis, nealson))\n\nSlime(mohammed, ardelis)\n\ntherefore Slime(mohammed, ardelis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The chelsey engulf the ahmed. The chelsey is devouring. The chelsey is mozambican. The ahmed engulf the chelsey. The ahmed lavish the chelsey. The sarena engulf the ahmed. The sarena engulf the janos. The sarena lavish the janos. The janos engulf the sarena. The janos lavish the sarena. If someone lavish the sarena then they are crass. If someone lavish the sarena and the sarena lavish the ahmed then the sarena is mozambican. If someone is chinchy then they chase the ahmed. If someone engulf the sarena and they are crass then the sarena lavish the chelsey. If someone lavish the sarena and they are mozambican then they eat the janos. If someone is devouring then they eat the sarena. If someone is crass then they are chinchy. If someone trespass the sarena then the sarena lavish the ahmed. The janos does not eat the sarena.", "logic": "\nEngulf(chelsey, ahmed)\nDevouring(chelsey)\nMozambican(chelsey)\nEngulf(ahmed, chelsey)\nLavish(ahmed, chelsey)\nEngulf(sarena, ahmed)\nEngulf(sarena, janos)\nLavish(sarena, janos)\nEngulf(janos, sarena)\nLavish(janos, sarena)\nforall x (Lavish(x, sarena) -> Crass(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x, sarena) and Lavish(sarena, ahmed) -> Mozambican(sarena))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Trespass(x, ahmed))\nforall x (Engulf(x, sarena) and Crass(x) -> Lavish(sarena, chelsey))\nforall x (Lavish(x, sarena) and Mozambican(x) -> Engulf(x, janos))\nforall x (Devouring(x) -> Engulf(x, sarena))\nforall x (Crass(x) -> Chinchy(x))\nforall x (Trespass(x, sarena) -> Lavish(sarena, ahmed))\n\nnot Engulf(janos, sarena)\n\ntherefore Engulf(janos, sarena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The tabbie indicate the arlee. The tabbie is brawny. The tabbie is unilateral. The arlee indicate the tabbie. The arlee indwell the tabbie. The edie indicate the arlee. The edie indicate the laurence. The edie indwell the laurence. The laurence indicate the edie. The laurence indwell the edie. If someone indwell the edie then they are volute. If someone indwell the edie and the edie indwell the arlee then the edie is unilateral. If someone is thirteenth then they chase the arlee. If someone indicate the edie and they are volute then the edie indwell the tabbie. If someone indwell the edie and they are unilateral then they eat the laurence. If someone is brawny then they eat the edie. If someone is volute then they are thirteenth. If someone tilt the edie then the edie indwell the arlee. The tabbie indicate the edie.", "logic": "\nIndicate(tabbie, arlee)\nBrawny(tabbie)\nUnilateral(tabbie)\nIndicate(arlee, tabbie)\nIndwell(arlee, tabbie)\nIndicate(edie, arlee)\nIndicate(edie, laurence)\nIndwell(edie, laurence)\nIndicate(laurence, edie)\nIndwell(laurence, edie)\nforall x (Indwell(x, edie) -> Volute(x))\nforall x (Indwell(x, edie) and Indwell(edie, arlee) -> Unilateral(edie))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) -> Tilt(x, arlee))\nforall x (Indicate(x, edie) and Volute(x) -> Indwell(edie, tabbie))\nforall x (Indwell(x, edie) and Unilateral(x) -> Indicate(x, laurence))\nforall x (Brawny(x) -> Indicate(x, edie))\nforall x (Volute(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Tilt(x, edie) -> Indwell(edie, arlee))\n\nIndicate(tabbie, edie)\n\nBrawny(tabbie) and forall x (Brawny(x) -> Indicate(x, edie)) -> therefore Indicate(tabbie, edie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The bart trisect the andri. The bart is gripping. The bart is unsized. The andri trisect the bart. The andri mulch the bart. The burnaby trisect the andri. The burnaby trisect the thebault. The burnaby mulch the thebault. The thebault trisect the burnaby. The thebault mulch the burnaby. If someone mulch the burnaby then they are unsavory. If someone mulch the burnaby and the burnaby mulch the andri then the burnaby is unsized. If someone is epizoic then they chase the andri. If someone trisect the burnaby and they are unsavory then the burnaby mulch the bart. If someone mulch the burnaby and they are unsized then they eat the thebault. If someone is gripping then they eat the burnaby. If someone is unsavory then they are epizoic. If someone pulse the burnaby then the burnaby mulch the andri. The thebault is not unsavory.", "logic": "\nTrisect(bart, andri)\nGripping(bart)\nUnsized(bart)\nTrisect(andri, bart)\nMulch(andri, bart)\nTrisect(burnaby, andri)\nTrisect(burnaby, thebault)\nMulch(burnaby, thebault)\nTrisect(thebault, burnaby)\nMulch(thebault, burnaby)\nforall x (Mulch(x, burnaby) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Mulch(x, burnaby) and Mulch(burnaby, andri) -> Unsized(burnaby))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Pulse(x, andri))\nforall x (Trisect(x, burnaby) and Unsavory(x) -> Mulch(burnaby, bart))\nforall x (Mulch(x, burnaby) and Unsized(x) -> Trisect(x, thebault))\nforall x (Gripping(x) -> Trisect(x, burnaby))\nforall x (Unsavory(x) -> Epizoic(x))\nforall x (Pulse(x, burnaby) -> Mulch(burnaby, andri))\n\nnot Unsavory(thebault)\n\nMulch(thebault, burnaby) and forall x (Mulch(x, burnaby) -> Unsavory(x)) -> therefore Unsavory(thebault)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The elysia cannulate the bridgett. The elysia is meaty. The elysia is nominal. The bridgett cannulate the elysia. The bridgett trump the elysia. The nancy cannulate the bridgett. The nancy cannulate the sim. The nancy trump the sim. The sim cannulate the nancy. The sim trump the nancy. If someone trump the nancy then they are anguine. If someone trump the nancy and the nancy trump the bridgett then the nancy is nominal. If someone is bismuthic then they chase the bridgett. If someone cannulate the nancy and they are anguine then the nancy trump the elysia. If someone trump the nancy and they are nominal then they eat the sim. If someone is meaty then they eat the nancy. If someone is anguine then they are bismuthic. If someone moderate the nancy then the nancy trump the bridgett. The sim is bismuthic.", "logic": "\nCannulate(elysia, bridgett)\nMeaty(elysia)\nNominal(elysia)\nCannulate(bridgett, elysia)\nTrump(bridgett, elysia)\nCannulate(nancy, bridgett)\nCannulate(nancy, sim)\nTrump(nancy, sim)\nCannulate(sim, nancy)\nTrump(sim, nancy)\nforall x (Trump(x, nancy) -> Anguine(x))\nforall x (Trump(x, nancy) and Trump(nancy, bridgett) -> Nominal(nancy))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> Moderate(x, bridgett))\nforall x (Cannulate(x, nancy) and Anguine(x) -> Trump(nancy, elysia))\nforall x (Trump(x, nancy) and Nominal(x) -> Cannulate(x, sim))\nforall x (Meaty(x) -> Cannulate(x, nancy))\nforall x (Anguine(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x, nancy) -> Trump(nancy, bridgett))\n\nBismuthic(sim)\n\nTrump(sim, nancy) and forall x (Trump(x, nancy) -> Anguine(x)) -> therefore Anguine(sim) Anguine(sim) and forall x (Anguine(x) -> Bismuthic(x)) -> therefore Bismuthic(sim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The russell silt the grover. The russell is unbroken. The russell is whiskered. The grover silt the russell. The grover drawl the russell. The jemima silt the grover. The jemima silt the marje. The jemima drawl the marje. The marje silt the jemima. The marje drawl the jemima. If someone drawl the jemima then they are subclavian. If someone drawl the jemima and the jemima drawl the grover then the jemima is whiskered. If someone is velar then they chase the grover. If someone silt the jemima and they are subclavian then the jemima drawl the russell. If someone drawl the jemima and they are whiskered then they eat the marje. If someone is unbroken then they eat the jemima. If someone is subclavian then they are velar. If someone garner the jemima then the jemima drawl the grover. The marje is not velar.", "logic": "\nSilt(russell, grover)\nUnbroken(russell)\nWhiskered(russell)\nSilt(grover, russell)\nDrawl(grover, russell)\nSilt(jemima, grover)\nSilt(jemima, marje)\nDrawl(jemima, marje)\nSilt(marje, jemima)\nDrawl(marje, jemima)\nforall x (Drawl(x, jemima) -> Subclavian(x))\nforall x (Drawl(x, jemima) and Drawl(jemima, grover) -> Whiskered(jemima))\nforall x (Velar(x) -> Garner(x, grover))\nforall x (Silt(x, jemima) and Subclavian(x) -> Drawl(jemima, russell))\nforall x (Drawl(x, jemima) and Whiskered(x) -> Silt(x, marje))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) -> Silt(x, jemima))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) -> Velar(x))\nforall x (Garner(x, jemima) -> Drawl(jemima, grover))\n\nnot Velar(marje)\n\nDrawl(marje, jemima) and forall x (Drawl(x, jemima) -> Subclavian(x)) -> therefore Subclavian(marje) Subclavian(marje) and forall x (Subclavian(x) -> Velar(x)) -> therefore Velar(marje)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The manuel mumble the sisile. The manuel is dolomitic. The manuel is protective. The sisile mumble the manuel. The sisile abort the manuel. The dorice mumble the sisile. The dorice mumble the lucian. The dorice abort the lucian. The lucian mumble the dorice. The lucian abort the dorice. If someone abort the dorice then they are glassy. If someone abort the dorice and the dorice abort the sisile then the dorice is protective. If someone is lovable then they chase the sisile. If someone mumble the dorice and they are glassy then the dorice abort the manuel. If someone abort the dorice and they are protective then they eat the lucian. If someone is dolomitic then they eat the dorice. If someone is glassy then they are lovable. If someone relegate the dorice then the dorice abort the sisile. The lucian relegate the sisile.", "logic": "\nMumble(manuel, sisile)\nDolomitic(manuel)\nProtective(manuel)\nMumble(sisile, manuel)\nAbort(sisile, manuel)\nMumble(dorice, sisile)\nMumble(dorice, lucian)\nAbort(dorice, lucian)\nMumble(lucian, dorice)\nAbort(lucian, dorice)\nforall x (Abort(x, dorice) -> Glassy(x))\nforall x (Abort(x, dorice) and Abort(dorice, sisile) -> Protective(dorice))\nforall x (Lovable(x) -> Relegate(x, sisile))\nforall x (Mumble(x, dorice) and Glassy(x) -> Abort(dorice, manuel))\nforall x (Abort(x, dorice) and Protective(x) -> Mumble(x, lucian))\nforall x (Dolomitic(x) -> Mumble(x, dorice))\nforall x (Glassy(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Relegate(x, dorice) -> Abort(dorice, sisile))\n\nRelegate(lucian, sisile)\n\nAbort(lucian, dorice) and forall x (Abort(x, dorice) -> Glassy(x)) -> therefore Glassy(lucian) Glassy(lucian) and forall x (Glassy(x) -> Lovable(x)) -> therefore Lovable(lucian) Lovable(lucian) and forall x (Lovable(x) -> Relegate(x, sisile)) -> therefore Relegate(lucian, sisile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The dorit relocate the thomasina. The dorit is harsh. The dorit is dirty. The thomasina relocate the dorit. The thomasina backlash the dorit. The cosetta relocate the thomasina. The cosetta relocate the merla. The cosetta backlash the merla. The merla relocate the cosetta. The merla backlash the cosetta. If someone backlash the cosetta then they are analytic. If someone backlash the cosetta and the cosetta backlash the thomasina then the cosetta is dirty. If someone is appetizing then they chase the thomasina. If someone relocate the cosetta and they are analytic then the cosetta backlash the dorit. If someone backlash the cosetta and they are dirty then they eat the merla. If someone is harsh then they eat the cosetta. If someone is analytic then they are appetizing. If someone recount the cosetta then the cosetta backlash the thomasina. The merla does not chase the thomasina.", "logic": "\nRelocate(dorit, thomasina)\nHarsh(dorit)\nDirty(dorit)\nRelocate(thomasina, dorit)\nBacklash(thomasina, dorit)\nRelocate(cosetta, thomasina)\nRelocate(cosetta, merla)\nBacklash(cosetta, merla)\nRelocate(merla, cosetta)\nBacklash(merla, cosetta)\nforall x (Backlash(x, cosetta) -> Analytic(x))\nforall x (Backlash(x, cosetta) and Backlash(cosetta, thomasina) -> Dirty(cosetta))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) -> Recount(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Relocate(x, cosetta) and Analytic(x) -> Backlash(cosetta, dorit))\nforall x (Backlash(x, cosetta) and Dirty(x) -> Relocate(x, merla))\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Relocate(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Analytic(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nforall x (Recount(x, cosetta) -> Backlash(cosetta, thomasina))\n\nnot Recount(merla, thomasina)\n\nBacklash(merla, cosetta) and forall x (Backlash(x, cosetta) -> Analytic(x)) -> therefore Analytic(merla) Analytic(merla) and forall x (Analytic(x) -> Appetizing(x)) -> therefore Appetizing(merla) Appetizing(merla) and forall x (Appetizing(x) -> Recount(x, thomasina)) -> therefore Recount(merla, thomasina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The gennie scat the earle. The gennie is bellicose. The gennie is flighty. The earle scat the gennie. The earle wrinkle the gennie. The kakalina scat the earle. The kakalina scat the billy. The kakalina wrinkle the billy. The billy scat the kakalina. The billy wrinkle the kakalina. If someone wrinkle the kakalina then they are unsound. If someone wrinkle the kakalina and the kakalina wrinkle the earle then the kakalina is flighty. If someone is hushed then they chase the earle. If someone scat the kakalina and they are unsound then the kakalina wrinkle the gennie. If someone wrinkle the kakalina and they are flighty then they eat the billy. If someone is bellicose then they eat the kakalina. If someone is unsound then they are hushed. If someone waitress the kakalina then the kakalina wrinkle the earle. The earle does not chase the earle.", "logic": "\nScat(gennie, earle)\nBellicose(gennie)\nFlighty(gennie)\nScat(earle, gennie)\nWrinkle(earle, gennie)\nScat(kakalina, earle)\nScat(kakalina, billy)\nWrinkle(kakalina, billy)\nScat(billy, kakalina)\nWrinkle(billy, kakalina)\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, kakalina) -> Unsound(x))\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, kakalina) and Wrinkle(kakalina, earle) -> Flighty(kakalina))\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Waitress(x, earle))\nforall x (Scat(x, kakalina) and Unsound(x) -> Wrinkle(kakalina, gennie))\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, kakalina) and Flighty(x) -> Scat(x, billy))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) -> Scat(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Unsound(x) -> Hushed(x))\nforall x (Waitress(x, kakalina) -> Wrinkle(kakalina, earle))\n\nnot Waitress(earle, earle)\n\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Waitress(x, earle)) <- forall x (Unsound(x) -> Hushed(x)) <- forall x (Wrinkle(x, kakalina) -> Unsound(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The kakalina grin the kalman. The kakalina is sinless. The kakalina is logistic. The kalman grin the kakalina. The kalman inundate the kakalina. The jemimah grin the kalman. The jemimah grin the skylar. The jemimah inundate the skylar. The skylar grin the jemimah. The skylar inundate the jemimah. If someone inundate the jemimah then they are classified. If someone inundate the jemimah and the jemimah inundate the kalman then the jemimah is logistic. If someone is beamish then they chase the kalman. If someone grin the jemimah and they are classified then the jemimah inundate the kakalina. If someone inundate the jemimah and they are logistic then they eat the skylar. If someone is sinless then they eat the jemimah. If someone is classified then they are beamish. If someone measure the jemimah then the jemimah inundate the kalman. The kakalina measure the kalman.", "logic": "\nGrin(kakalina, kalman)\nSinless(kakalina)\nLogistic(kakalina)\nGrin(kalman, kakalina)\nInundate(kalman, kakalina)\nGrin(jemimah, kalman)\nGrin(jemimah, skylar)\nInundate(jemimah, skylar)\nGrin(skylar, jemimah)\nInundate(skylar, jemimah)\nforall x (Inundate(x, jemimah) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Inundate(x, jemimah) and Inundate(jemimah, kalman) -> Logistic(jemimah))\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> Measure(x, kalman))\nforall x (Grin(x, jemimah) and Classified(x) -> Inundate(jemimah, kakalina))\nforall x (Inundate(x, jemimah) and Logistic(x) -> Grin(x, skylar))\nforall x (Sinless(x) -> Grin(x, jemimah))\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Beamish(x))\nforall x (Measure(x, jemimah) -> Inundate(jemimah, kalman))\n\nMeasure(kakalina, kalman)\n\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> Measure(x, kalman)) <- forall x (Classified(x) -> Beamish(x)) <- forall x (Inundate(x, jemimah) -> Classified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The clarita stain the joel. The clarita is categoric. The clarita is taiwanese. The joel stain the clarita. The joel garnishee the clarita. The jeni stain the joel. The jeni stain the nettie. The jeni garnishee the nettie. The nettie stain the jeni. The nettie garnishee the jeni. If someone garnishee the jeni then they are monovalent. If someone garnishee the jeni and the jeni garnishee the joel then the jeni is taiwanese. If someone is unchecked then they chase the joel. If someone stain the jeni and they are monovalent then the jeni garnishee the clarita. If someone garnishee the jeni and they are taiwanese then they eat the nettie. If someone is categoric then they eat the jeni. If someone is monovalent then they are unchecked. If someone flinch the jeni then the jeni garnishee the joel. The nettie does not eat the nettie.", "logic": "\nStain(clarita, joel)\nCategoric(clarita)\nTaiwanese(clarita)\nStain(joel, clarita)\nGarnishee(joel, clarita)\nStain(jeni, joel)\nStain(jeni, nettie)\nGarnishee(jeni, nettie)\nStain(nettie, jeni)\nGarnishee(nettie, jeni)\nforall x (Garnishee(x, jeni) -> Monovalent(x))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, jeni) and Garnishee(jeni, joel) -> Taiwanese(jeni))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) -> Flinch(x, joel))\nforall x (Stain(x, jeni) and Monovalent(x) -> Garnishee(jeni, clarita))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, jeni) and Taiwanese(x) -> Stain(x, nettie))\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Stain(x, jeni))\nforall x (Monovalent(x) -> Unchecked(x))\nforall x (Flinch(x, jeni) -> Garnishee(jeni, joel))\n\nnot Stain(nettie, nettie)\n\nforall x (Garnishee(x, jeni) and Taiwanese(x) -> Stain(x, nettie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The beth screen the aleen. The beth is cerebellar. The beth is jilted. The aleen screen the beth. The aleen disavow the beth. The thia screen the aleen. The thia screen the jenni. The thia disavow the jenni. The jenni screen the thia. The jenni disavow the thia. If someone disavow the thia then they are mothproof. If someone disavow the thia and the thia disavow the aleen then the thia is jilted. If someone is fantastic then they chase the aleen. If someone screen the thia and they are mothproof then the thia disavow the beth. If someone disavow the thia and they are jilted then they eat the jenni. If someone is cerebellar then they eat the thia. If someone is mothproof then they are fantastic. If someone patent the thia then the thia disavow the aleen. The aleen screen the thia.", "logic": "\nScreen(beth, aleen)\nCerebellar(beth)\nJilted(beth)\nScreen(aleen, beth)\nDisavow(aleen, beth)\nScreen(thia, aleen)\nScreen(thia, jenni)\nDisavow(thia, jenni)\nScreen(jenni, thia)\nDisavow(jenni, thia)\nforall x (Disavow(x, thia) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Disavow(x, thia) and Disavow(thia, aleen) -> Jilted(thia))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) -> Patent(x, aleen))\nforall x (Screen(x, thia) and Mothproof(x) -> Disavow(thia, beth))\nforall x (Disavow(x, thia) and Jilted(x) -> Screen(x, jenni))\nforall x (Cerebellar(x) -> Screen(x, thia))\nforall x (Mothproof(x) -> Fantastic(x))\nforall x (Patent(x, thia) -> Disavow(thia, aleen))\n\nScreen(aleen, thia)\n\nforall x (Cerebellar(x) -> Screen(x, thia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The conni bargain the ranice. The conni is internal. The conni is intriguing. The ranice bargain the conni. The ranice throne the conni. The olivie bargain the ranice. The olivie bargain the karim. The olivie throne the karim. The karim bargain the olivie. The karim throne the olivie. If someone throne the olivie then they are exogenic. If someone throne the olivie and the olivie throne the ranice then the olivie is intriguing. If someone is endogenous then they chase the ranice. If someone bargain the olivie and they are exogenic then the olivie throne the conni. If someone throne the olivie and they are intriguing then they eat the karim. If someone is internal then they eat the olivie. If someone is exogenic then they are endogenous. If someone solder the olivie then the olivie throne the ranice. The olivie is not internal.", "logic": "\nBargain(conni, ranice)\nInternal(conni)\nIntriguing(conni)\nBargain(ranice, conni)\nThrone(ranice, conni)\nBargain(olivie, ranice)\nBargain(olivie, karim)\nThrone(olivie, karim)\nBargain(karim, olivie)\nThrone(karim, olivie)\nforall x (Throne(x, olivie) -> Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Throne(x, olivie) and Throne(olivie, ranice) -> Intriguing(olivie))\nforall x (Endogenous(x) -> Solder(x, ranice))\nforall x (Bargain(x, olivie) and Exogenic(x) -> Throne(olivie, conni))\nforall x (Throne(x, olivie) and Intriguing(x) -> Bargain(x, karim))\nforall x (Internal(x) -> Bargain(x, olivie))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Solder(x, olivie) -> Throne(olivie, ranice))\n\nnot Internal(olivie)\n\nnot Internal(olivie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The sterne interact the francesca. The sterne is unlucky. The sterne is piffling. The francesca interact the sterne. The francesca harm the sterne. The teri interact the francesca. The teri interact the angelita. The teri harm the angelita. The angelita interact the teri. The angelita harm the teri. If someone harm the teri then they are inguinal. If someone harm the teri and the teri harm the francesca then the teri is piffling. If someone is mitigable then they chase the francesca. If someone interact the teri and they are inguinal then the teri harm the sterne. If someone harm the teri and they are piffling then they eat the angelita. If someone is unlucky then they eat the teri. If someone is inguinal then they are mitigable. If someone shirt the teri then the teri harm the francesca. The francesca shirt the angelita.", "logic": "\nInteract(sterne, francesca)\nUnlucky(sterne)\nPiffling(sterne)\nInteract(francesca, sterne)\nHarm(francesca, sterne)\nInteract(teri, francesca)\nInteract(teri, angelita)\nHarm(teri, angelita)\nInteract(angelita, teri)\nHarm(angelita, teri)\nforall x (Harm(x, teri) -> Inguinal(x))\nforall x (Harm(x, teri) and Harm(teri, francesca) -> Piffling(teri))\nforall x (Mitigable(x) -> Shirt(x, francesca))\nforall x (Interact(x, teri) and Inguinal(x) -> Harm(teri, sterne))\nforall x (Harm(x, teri) and Piffling(x) -> Interact(x, angelita))\nforall x (Unlucky(x) -> Interact(x, teri))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) -> Mitigable(x))\nforall x (Shirt(x, teri) -> Harm(teri, francesca))\n\nShirt(francesca, angelita)\n\nShirt(francesca, angelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The glennis prove the charmain. The glennis is eviscerate. The glennis is benzenoid. The charmain prove the glennis. The charmain ache the glennis. The orville prove the charmain. The orville prove the ketty. The orville ache the ketty. The ketty prove the orville. The ketty ache the orville. If someone ache the orville then they are rotted. If someone ache the orville and the orville ache the charmain then the orville is benzenoid. If someone is craved then they chase the charmain. If someone prove the orville and they are rotted then the orville ache the glennis. If someone ache the orville and they are benzenoid then they eat the ketty. If someone is eviscerate then they eat the orville. If someone is rotted then they are craved. If someone filch the orville then the orville ache the charmain. The glennis does not visit the orville.", "logic": "\nProve(glennis, charmain)\nEviscerate(glennis)\nBenzenoid(glennis)\nProve(charmain, glennis)\nAche(charmain, glennis)\nProve(orville, charmain)\nProve(orville, ketty)\nAche(orville, ketty)\nProve(ketty, orville)\nAche(ketty, orville)\nforall x (Ache(x, orville) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Ache(x, orville) and Ache(orville, charmain) -> Benzenoid(orville))\nforall x (Craved(x) -> Filch(x, charmain))\nforall x (Prove(x, orville) and Rotted(x) -> Ache(orville, glennis))\nforall x (Ache(x, orville) and Benzenoid(x) -> Prove(x, ketty))\nforall x (Eviscerate(x) -> Prove(x, orville))\nforall x (Rotted(x) -> Craved(x))\nforall x (Filch(x, orville) -> Ache(orville, charmain))\n\nnot Ache(glennis, orville)\n\nnot Ache(glennis, orville) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The connolly raft the ulick. The connolly is repeated. The connolly is goaded. The ulick raft the connolly. The ulick unweave the connolly. The abelard raft the ulick. The abelard raft the brier. The abelard unweave the brier. The brier raft the abelard. The brier unweave the abelard. If someone unweave the abelard then they are laureate. If someone unweave the abelard and the abelard unweave the ulick then the abelard is goaded. If someone is vermillion then they chase the ulick. If someone raft the abelard and they are laureate then the abelard unweave the connolly. If someone unweave the abelard and they are goaded then they eat the brier. If someone is repeated then they eat the abelard. If someone is laureate then they are vermillion. If someone narcotise the abelard then the abelard unweave the ulick. The brier is young.", "logic": "\nRaft(connolly, ulick)\nRepeated(connolly)\nGoaded(connolly)\nRaft(ulick, connolly)\nUnweave(ulick, connolly)\nRaft(abelard, ulick)\nRaft(abelard, brier)\nUnweave(abelard, brier)\nRaft(brier, abelard)\nUnweave(brier, abelard)\nforall x (Unweave(x, abelard) -> Laureate(x))\nforall x (Unweave(x, abelard) and Unweave(abelard, ulick) -> Goaded(abelard))\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Narcotise(x, ulick))\nforall x (Raft(x, abelard) and Laureate(x) -> Unweave(abelard, connolly))\nforall x (Unweave(x, abelard) and Goaded(x) -> Raft(x, brier))\nforall x (Repeated(x) -> Raft(x, abelard))\nforall x (Laureate(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, abelard) -> Unweave(abelard, ulick))\n\nYoung(brier)\n\nYoung(brier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The rheba feud the marlon. The rheba is olfactory. The rheba is promotive. The rheba replicate the marlon. The marlon is not olfactory. The marlon is not blustery. The marlon outgrow the rheba. If something is suboceanic and not promotive then it replicate the marlon. If something outgrow the rheba then the rheba outgrow the marlon. If something replicate the rheba and it outgrow the rheba then the rheba is not suboceanic. If the marlon is czarist then the marlon feud the rheba. If the rheba outgrow the marlon then the rheba is not blustery. If something replicate the marlon then the marlon is not blustery. If something replicate the marlon then the marlon replicate the rheba. If something outgrow the rheba and the rheba is not blustery then it does not eat the marlon. The marlon is not olfactory.", "logic": "\nFeud(rheba, marlon)\nOlfactory(rheba)\nPromotive(rheba)\nReplicate(rheba, marlon)\nnot Olfactory(marlon)\nnot Blustery(marlon)\nOutgrow(marlon, rheba)\nforall x (Suboceanic(x) and not Promotive(x) -> Replicate(x, marlon))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, rheba) -> Outgrow(rheba, marlon))\nforall x (Replicate(x, rheba) and Outgrow(x, rheba) -> not Suboceanic(rheba))\nCzarist(marlon) -> Feud(marlon, rheba)\nOutgrow(rheba, marlon) -> not Blustery(rheba)\nforall x (Replicate(x, marlon) -> not Blustery(marlon))\nforall x (Replicate(x, marlon) -> Replicate(marlon, rheba))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, rheba) and not Blustery(rheba) -> not Feud(x, marlon))\n\nnot Olfactory(marlon)\n\ntherefore not Olfactory(marlon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The phyllys steam the janis. The phyllys is heartless. The phyllys is abeyant. The phyllys copyread the janis. The janis is not heartless. The janis is not tameable. The janis warehouse the phyllys. If something is auriform and not abeyant then it copyread the janis. If something warehouse the phyllys then the phyllys warehouse the janis. If something copyread the phyllys and it warehouse the phyllys then the phyllys is not auriform. If the janis is cathedral then the janis steam the phyllys. If the phyllys warehouse the janis then the phyllys is not tameable. If something copyread the janis then the janis is not tameable. If something copyread the janis then the janis copyread the phyllys. If something warehouse the phyllys and the phyllys is not tameable then it does not eat the janis. The janis is tameable.", "logic": "\nSteam(phyllys, janis)\nHeartless(phyllys)\nAbeyant(phyllys)\nCopyread(phyllys, janis)\nnot Heartless(janis)\nnot Tameable(janis)\nWarehouse(janis, phyllys)\nforall x (Auriform(x) and not Abeyant(x) -> Copyread(x, janis))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, phyllys) -> Warehouse(phyllys, janis))\nforall x (Copyread(x, phyllys) and Warehouse(x, phyllys) -> not Auriform(phyllys))\nCathedral(janis) -> Steam(janis, phyllys)\nWarehouse(phyllys, janis) -> not Tameable(phyllys)\nforall x (Copyread(x, janis) -> not Tameable(janis))\nforall x (Copyread(x, janis) -> Copyread(janis, phyllys))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, phyllys) and not Tameable(phyllys) -> not Steam(x, janis))\n\nTameable(janis)\n\ntherefore not Tameable(janis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The toddie detick the helaine. The toddie is stalkless. The toddie is neuter. The toddie hump the helaine. The helaine is not stalkless. The helaine is not chained. The helaine linearise the toddie. If something is tailored and not neuter then it hump the helaine. If something linearise the toddie then the toddie linearise the helaine. If something hump the toddie and it linearise the toddie then the toddie is not tailored. If the helaine is sprightly then the helaine detick the toddie. If the toddie linearise the helaine then the toddie is not chained. If something hump the helaine then the helaine is not chained. If something hump the helaine then the helaine hump the toddie. If something linearise the toddie and the toddie is not chained then it does not eat the helaine. The helaine hump the toddie.", "logic": "\nDetick(toddie, helaine)\nStalkless(toddie)\nNeuter(toddie)\nHump(toddie, helaine)\nnot Stalkless(helaine)\nnot Chained(helaine)\nLinearise(helaine, toddie)\nforall x (Tailored(x) and not Neuter(x) -> Hump(x, helaine))\nforall x (Linearise(x, toddie) -> Linearise(toddie, helaine))\nforall x (Hump(x, toddie) and Linearise(x, toddie) -> not Tailored(toddie))\nSprightly(helaine) -> Detick(helaine, toddie)\nLinearise(toddie, helaine) -> not Chained(toddie)\nforall x (Hump(x, helaine) -> not Chained(helaine))\nforall x (Hump(x, helaine) -> Hump(helaine, toddie))\nforall x (Linearise(x, toddie) and not Chained(toddie) -> not Detick(x, helaine))\n\nHump(helaine, toddie)\n\nHump(toddie, helaine) and forall x (Hump(x, helaine) -> Hump(helaine, toddie)) -> therefore Hump(helaine, toddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The harriot overcook the leon. The harriot is siberian. The harriot is shamanist. The harriot roughcast the leon. The leon is not siberian. The leon is not anopheline. The leon uncompress the harriot. If something is apocarpous and not shamanist then it roughcast the leon. If something uncompress the harriot then the harriot uncompress the leon. If something roughcast the harriot and it uncompress the harriot then the harriot is not apocarpous. If the leon is adopted then the leon overcook the harriot. If the harriot uncompress the leon then the harriot is not anopheline. If something roughcast the leon then the leon is not anopheline. If something roughcast the leon then the leon roughcast the harriot. If something uncompress the harriot and the harriot is not anopheline then it does not eat the leon. The harriot does not visit the leon.", "logic": "\nOvercook(harriot, leon)\nSiberian(harriot)\nShamanist(harriot)\nRoughcast(harriot, leon)\nnot Siberian(leon)\nnot Anopheline(leon)\nUncompress(leon, harriot)\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) and not Shamanist(x) -> Roughcast(x, leon))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, harriot) -> Uncompress(harriot, leon))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, harriot) and Uncompress(x, harriot) -> not Apocarpous(harriot))\nAdopted(leon) -> Overcook(leon, harriot)\nUncompress(harriot, leon) -> not Anopheline(harriot)\nforall x (Roughcast(x, leon) -> not Anopheline(leon))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, leon) -> Roughcast(leon, harriot))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, harriot) and not Anopheline(harriot) -> not Overcook(x, leon))\n\nnot Uncompress(harriot, leon)\n\nUncompress(leon, harriot) and forall x (Uncompress(x, harriot) -> Uncompress(harriot, leon)) -> therefore Uncompress(harriot, leon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The ramonda outsmart the giordano. The ramonda is ventricose. The ramonda is breathing. The ramonda impugn the giordano. The giordano is not ventricose. The giordano is not blubbery. The giordano disesteem the ramonda. If something is gelded and not breathing then it impugn the giordano. If something disesteem the ramonda then the ramonda disesteem the giordano. If something impugn the ramonda and it disesteem the ramonda then the ramonda is not gelded. If the giordano is otiose then the giordano outsmart the ramonda. If the ramonda disesteem the giordano then the ramonda is not blubbery. If something impugn the giordano then the giordano is not blubbery. If something impugn the giordano then the giordano impugn the ramonda. If something disesteem the ramonda and the ramonda is not blubbery then it does not eat the giordano. The ramonda is not blubbery.", "logic": "\nOutsmart(ramonda, giordano)\nVentricose(ramonda)\nBreathing(ramonda)\nImpugn(ramonda, giordano)\nnot Ventricose(giordano)\nnot Blubbery(giordano)\nDisesteem(giordano, ramonda)\nforall x (Gelded(x) and not Breathing(x) -> Impugn(x, giordano))\nforall x (Disesteem(x, ramonda) -> Disesteem(ramonda, giordano))\nforall x (Impugn(x, ramonda) and Disesteem(x, ramonda) -> not Gelded(ramonda))\nOtiose(giordano) -> Outsmart(giordano, ramonda)\nDisesteem(ramonda, giordano) -> not Blubbery(ramonda)\nforall x (Impugn(x, giordano) -> not Blubbery(giordano))\nforall x (Impugn(x, giordano) -> Impugn(giordano, ramonda))\nforall x (Disesteem(x, ramonda) and not Blubbery(ramonda) -> not Outsmart(x, giordano))\n\nnot Blubbery(ramonda)\n\nDisesteem(giordano, ramonda) and forall x (Disesteem(x, ramonda) -> Disesteem(ramonda, giordano)) -> therefore Disesteem(ramonda, giordano) Disesteem(ramonda, giordano) and Disesteem(ramonda, giordano) -> not Blubbery(ramonda) -> therefore not Blubbery(ramonda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The tuck deploy the mackenzie. The tuck is echolike. The tuck is profligate. The tuck typewrite the mackenzie. The mackenzie is not echolike. The mackenzie is not visual. The mackenzie debark the tuck. If something is delphic and not profligate then it typewrite the mackenzie. If something debark the tuck then the tuck debark the mackenzie. If something typewrite the tuck and it debark the tuck then the tuck is not delphic. If the mackenzie is decorated then the mackenzie deploy the tuck. If the tuck debark the mackenzie then the tuck is not visual. If something typewrite the mackenzie then the mackenzie is not visual. If something typewrite the mackenzie then the mackenzie typewrite the tuck. If something debark the tuck and the tuck is not visual then it does not eat the mackenzie. The tuck is delphic.", "logic": "\nDeploy(tuck, mackenzie)\nEcholike(tuck)\nProfligate(tuck)\nTypewrite(tuck, mackenzie)\nnot Echolike(mackenzie)\nnot Visual(mackenzie)\nDebark(mackenzie, tuck)\nforall x (Delphic(x) and not Profligate(x) -> Typewrite(x, mackenzie))\nforall x (Debark(x, tuck) -> Debark(tuck, mackenzie))\nforall x (Typewrite(x, tuck) and Debark(x, tuck) -> not Delphic(tuck))\nDecorated(mackenzie) -> Deploy(mackenzie, tuck)\nDebark(tuck, mackenzie) -> not Visual(tuck)\nforall x (Typewrite(x, mackenzie) -> not Visual(mackenzie))\nforall x (Typewrite(x, mackenzie) -> Typewrite(mackenzie, tuck))\nforall x (Debark(x, tuck) and not Visual(tuck) -> not Deploy(x, mackenzie))\n\nDelphic(tuck)\n\nTypewrite(tuck, mackenzie) and forall x (Typewrite(x, mackenzie) -> Typewrite(mackenzie, tuck)) -> therefore Typewrite(mackenzie, tuck) Typewrite(mackenzie, tuck) and Debark(mackenzie, tuck) and forall x (Typewrite(x, tuck) and Debark(x, tuck) -> not Delphic(tuck)) -> therefore not Delphic(tuck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The jared study the eada. The jared is blithe. The jared is curving. The jared stint the eada. The eada is not blithe. The eada is not extralegal. The eada hijack the jared. If something is unadorned and not curving then it stint the eada. If something hijack the jared then the jared hijack the eada. If something stint the jared and it hijack the jared then the jared is not unadorned. If the eada is concurrent then the eada study the jared. If the jared hijack the eada then the jared is not extralegal. If something stint the eada then the eada is not extralegal. If something stint the eada then the eada stint the jared. If something hijack the jared and the jared is not extralegal then it does not eat the eada. The eada does not eat the eada.", "logic": "\nStudy(jared, eada)\nBlithe(jared)\nCurving(jared)\nStint(jared, eada)\nnot Blithe(eada)\nnot Extralegal(eada)\nHijack(eada, jared)\nforall x (Unadorned(x) and not Curving(x) -> Stint(x, eada))\nforall x (Hijack(x, jared) -> Hijack(jared, eada))\nforall x (Stint(x, jared) and Hijack(x, jared) -> not Unadorned(jared))\nConcurrent(eada) -> Study(eada, jared)\nHijack(jared, eada) -> not Extralegal(jared)\nforall x (Stint(x, eada) -> not Extralegal(eada))\nforall x (Stint(x, eada) -> Stint(eada, jared))\nforall x (Hijack(x, jared) and not Extralegal(jared) -> not Study(x, eada))\n\nnot Study(eada, eada)\n\nHijack(eada, jared) and forall x (Hijack(x, jared) -> Hijack(jared, eada)) -> therefore Hijack(jared, eada) Hijack(jared, eada) and Hijack(jared, eada) -> not Extralegal(jared) -> therefore not Extralegal(jared) Hijack(eada, jared) and not Extralegal(jared) and forall x (Hijack(x, jared) and not Extralegal(jared) -> not Study(x, eada)) -> therefore not Study(eada, eada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The nettie happen the stanton. The nettie is exploded. The nettie is decisive. The nettie disbar the stanton. The stanton is not exploded. The stanton is not starving. The stanton crunch the nettie. If something is fazed and not decisive then it disbar the stanton. If something crunch the nettie then the nettie crunch the stanton. If something disbar the nettie and it crunch the nettie then the nettie is not fazed. If the stanton is broad then the stanton happen the nettie. If the nettie crunch the stanton then the nettie is not starving. If something disbar the stanton then the stanton is not starving. If something disbar the stanton then the stanton disbar the nettie. If something crunch the nettie and the nettie is not starving then it does not eat the stanton. The stanton happen the stanton.", "logic": "\nHappen(nettie, stanton)\nExploded(nettie)\nDecisive(nettie)\nDisbar(nettie, stanton)\nnot Exploded(stanton)\nnot Starving(stanton)\nCrunch(stanton, nettie)\nforall x (Fazed(x) and not Decisive(x) -> Disbar(x, stanton))\nforall x (Crunch(x, nettie) -> Crunch(nettie, stanton))\nforall x (Disbar(x, nettie) and Crunch(x, nettie) -> not Fazed(nettie))\nBroad(stanton) -> Happen(stanton, nettie)\nCrunch(nettie, stanton) -> not Starving(nettie)\nforall x (Disbar(x, stanton) -> not Starving(stanton))\nforall x (Disbar(x, stanton) -> Disbar(stanton, nettie))\nforall x (Crunch(x, nettie) and not Starving(nettie) -> not Happen(x, stanton))\n\nHappen(stanton, stanton)\n\nCrunch(stanton, nettie) and forall x (Crunch(x, nettie) -> Crunch(nettie, stanton)) -> therefore Crunch(nettie, stanton) Crunch(nettie, stanton) and Crunch(nettie, stanton) -> not Starving(nettie) -> therefore not Starving(nettie) Crunch(stanton, nettie) and not Starving(nettie) and forall x (Crunch(x, nettie) and not Starving(nettie) -> not Happen(x, stanton)) -> therefore not Happen(stanton, stanton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The tessy isolate the leiah. The tessy is climatic. The tessy is sarawakian. The tessy foreshadow the leiah. The leiah is not climatic. The leiah is not decurved. The leiah untwist the tessy. If something is centered and not sarawakian then it foreshadow the leiah. If something untwist the tessy then the tessy untwist the leiah. If something foreshadow the tessy and it untwist the tessy then the tessy is not centered. If the leiah is selfsame then the leiah isolate the tessy. If the tessy untwist the leiah then the tessy is not decurved. If something foreshadow the leiah then the leiah is not decurved. If something foreshadow the leiah then the leiah foreshadow the tessy. If something untwist the tessy and the tessy is not decurved then it does not eat the leiah. The leiah does not see the leiah.", "logic": "\nIsolate(tessy, leiah)\nClimatic(tessy)\nSarawakian(tessy)\nForeshadow(tessy, leiah)\nnot Climatic(leiah)\nnot Decurved(leiah)\nUntwist(leiah, tessy)\nforall x (Centered(x) and not Sarawakian(x) -> Foreshadow(x, leiah))\nforall x (Untwist(x, tessy) -> Untwist(tessy, leiah))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, tessy) and Untwist(x, tessy) -> not Centered(tessy))\nSelfsame(leiah) -> Isolate(leiah, tessy)\nUntwist(tessy, leiah) -> not Decurved(tessy)\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, leiah) -> not Decurved(leiah))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, leiah) -> Foreshadow(leiah, tessy))\nforall x (Untwist(x, tessy) and not Decurved(tessy) -> not Isolate(x, leiah))\n\nnot Foreshadow(leiah, leiah)\n\nforall x (Centered(x) and not Sarawakian(x) -> Foreshadow(x, leiah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The wynny surmise the shepherd. The wynny is troubling. The wynny is undried. The wynny totalize the shepherd. The shepherd is not troubling. The shepherd is not atavistic. The shepherd employ the wynny. If something is lxxxiii and not undried then it totalize the shepherd. If something employ the wynny then the wynny employ the shepherd. If something totalize the wynny and it employ the wynny then the wynny is not lxxxiii. If the shepherd is miotic then the shepherd surmise the wynny. If the wynny employ the shepherd then the wynny is not atavistic. If something totalize the shepherd then the shepherd is not atavistic. If something totalize the shepherd then the shepherd totalize the wynny. If something employ the wynny and the wynny is not atavistic then it does not eat the shepherd. The shepherd surmise the wynny.", "logic": "\nSurmise(wynny, shepherd)\nTroubling(wynny)\nUndried(wynny)\nTotalize(wynny, shepherd)\nnot Troubling(shepherd)\nnot Atavistic(shepherd)\nEmploy(shepherd, wynny)\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) and not Undried(x) -> Totalize(x, shepherd))\nforall x (Employ(x, wynny) -> Employ(wynny, shepherd))\nforall x (Totalize(x, wynny) and Employ(x, wynny) -> not Lxxxiii(wynny))\nMiotic(shepherd) -> Surmise(shepherd, wynny)\nEmploy(wynny, shepherd) -> not Atavistic(wynny)\nforall x (Totalize(x, shepherd) -> not Atavistic(shepherd))\nforall x (Totalize(x, shepherd) -> Totalize(shepherd, wynny))\nforall x (Employ(x, wynny) and not Atavistic(wynny) -> not Surmise(x, shepherd))\n\nSurmise(shepherd, wynny)\n\nMiotic(shepherd) -> Surmise(shepherd, wynny) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The alameda strickle the genni. The alameda is hypnotised. The alameda is nonwoody. The alameda voice the genni. The genni is not hypnotised. The genni is not undeclared. The genni encipher the alameda. If something is sliced and not nonwoody then it voice the genni. If something encipher the alameda then the alameda encipher the genni. If something voice the alameda and it encipher the alameda then the alameda is not sliced. If the genni is xxxvii then the genni strickle the alameda. If the alameda encipher the genni then the alameda is not undeclared. If something voice the genni then the genni is not undeclared. If something voice the genni then the genni voice the alameda. If something encipher the alameda and the alameda is not undeclared then it does not eat the genni. The genni does not visit the genni.", "logic": "\nStrickle(alameda, genni)\nHypnotised(alameda)\nNonwoody(alameda)\nVoice(alameda, genni)\nnot Hypnotised(genni)\nnot Undeclared(genni)\nEncipher(genni, alameda)\nforall x (Sliced(x) and not Nonwoody(x) -> Voice(x, genni))\nforall x (Encipher(x, alameda) -> Encipher(alameda, genni))\nforall x (Voice(x, alameda) and Encipher(x, alameda) -> not Sliced(alameda))\nXxxvii(genni) -> Strickle(genni, alameda)\nEncipher(alameda, genni) -> not Undeclared(alameda)\nforall x (Voice(x, genni) -> not Undeclared(genni))\nforall x (Voice(x, genni) -> Voice(genni, alameda))\nforall x (Encipher(x, alameda) and not Undeclared(alameda) -> not Strickle(x, genni))\n\nnot Encipher(genni, genni)\n\nnot Encipher(genni, genni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The row muzzle the doroteya. The row is parttime. The row is tolerant. The row monetize the doroteya. The doroteya is not parttime. The doroteya is not cachectic. The doroteya fade the row. If something is chelated and not tolerant then it monetize the doroteya. If something fade the row then the row fade the doroteya. If something monetize the row and it fade the row then the row is not chelated. If the doroteya is fulminant then the doroteya muzzle the row. If the row fade the doroteya then the row is not cachectic. If something monetize the doroteya then the doroteya is not cachectic. If something monetize the doroteya then the doroteya monetize the row. If something fade the row and the row is not cachectic then it does not eat the doroteya. The row monetize the row.", "logic": "\nMuzzle(row, doroteya)\nParttime(row)\nTolerant(row)\nMonetize(row, doroteya)\nnot Parttime(doroteya)\nnot Cachectic(doroteya)\nFade(doroteya, row)\nforall x (Chelated(x) and not Tolerant(x) -> Monetize(x, doroteya))\nforall x (Fade(x, row) -> Fade(row, doroteya))\nforall x (Monetize(x, row) and Fade(x, row) -> not Chelated(row))\nFulminant(doroteya) -> Muzzle(doroteya, row)\nFade(row, doroteya) -> not Cachectic(row)\nforall x (Monetize(x, doroteya) -> not Cachectic(doroteya))\nforall x (Monetize(x, doroteya) -> Monetize(doroteya, row))\nforall x (Fade(x, row) and not Cachectic(row) -> not Muzzle(x, doroteya))\n\nMonetize(row, row)\n\nMonetize(row, row) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The evania heat the mic. The evania is unabused. The evania is civil. The evania bump the mic. The mic is not unabused. The mic is not stacked. The mic grin the evania. If something is sensuous and not civil then it bump the mic. If something grin the evania then the evania grin the mic. If something bump the evania and it grin the evania then the evania is not sensuous. If the mic is coming then the mic heat the evania. If the evania grin the mic then the evania is not stacked. If something bump the mic then the mic is not stacked. If something bump the mic then the mic bump the evania. If something grin the evania and the evania is not stacked then it does not eat the mic. The evania is not coming.", "logic": "\nHeat(evania, mic)\nUnabused(evania)\nCivil(evania)\nBump(evania, mic)\nnot Unabused(mic)\nnot Stacked(mic)\nGrin(mic, evania)\nforall x (Sensuous(x) and not Civil(x) -> Bump(x, mic))\nforall x (Grin(x, evania) -> Grin(evania, mic))\nforall x (Bump(x, evania) and Grin(x, evania) -> not Sensuous(evania))\nComing(mic) -> Heat(mic, evania)\nGrin(evania, mic) -> not Stacked(evania)\nforall x (Bump(x, mic) -> not Stacked(mic))\nforall x (Bump(x, mic) -> Bump(mic, evania))\nforall x (Grin(x, evania) and not Stacked(evania) -> not Heat(x, mic))\n\nnot Coming(evania)\n\nnot Coming(evania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The gordan menace the caspar. The gordan is curatorial. The gordan is articled. The gordan immingle the caspar. The caspar is not curatorial. The caspar is not acinose. The caspar warp the gordan. If something is sweltering and not articled then it immingle the caspar. If something warp the gordan then the gordan warp the caspar. If something immingle the gordan and it warp the gordan then the gordan is not sweltering. If the caspar is boneless then the caspar menace the gordan. If the gordan warp the caspar then the gordan is not acinose. If something immingle the caspar then the caspar is not acinose. If something immingle the caspar then the caspar immingle the gordan. If something warp the gordan and the gordan is not acinose then it does not eat the caspar. The gordan menace the gordan.", "logic": "\nMenace(gordan, caspar)\nCuratorial(gordan)\nArticled(gordan)\nImmingle(gordan, caspar)\nnot Curatorial(caspar)\nnot Acinose(caspar)\nWarp(caspar, gordan)\nforall x (Sweltering(x) and not Articled(x) -> Immingle(x, caspar))\nforall x (Warp(x, gordan) -> Warp(gordan, caspar))\nforall x (Immingle(x, gordan) and Warp(x, gordan) -> not Sweltering(gordan))\nBoneless(caspar) -> Menace(caspar, gordan)\nWarp(gordan, caspar) -> not Acinose(gordan)\nforall x (Immingle(x, caspar) -> not Acinose(caspar))\nforall x (Immingle(x, caspar) -> Immingle(caspar, gordan))\nforall x (Warp(x, gordan) and not Acinose(gordan) -> not Menace(x, caspar))\n\nMenace(gordan, gordan)\n\nMenace(gordan, gordan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The laural rebuff the dannie. The laural is glum. The laural is roughdried. The laural iron the dannie. The dannie is not glum. The dannie is not mesmerized. The dannie nutrify the laural. If something is unsalaried and not roughdried then it iron the dannie. If something nutrify the laural then the laural nutrify the dannie. If something iron the laural and it nutrify the laural then the laural is not unsalaried. If the dannie is pectineal then the dannie rebuff the laural. If the laural nutrify the dannie then the laural is not mesmerized. If something iron the dannie then the dannie is not mesmerized. If something iron the dannie then the dannie iron the laural. If something nutrify the laural and the laural is not mesmerized then it does not eat the dannie. The dannie is not roughdried.", "logic": "\nRebuff(laural, dannie)\nGlum(laural)\nRoughdried(laural)\nIron(laural, dannie)\nnot Glum(dannie)\nnot Mesmerized(dannie)\nNutrify(dannie, laural)\nforall x (Unsalaried(x) and not Roughdried(x) -> Iron(x, dannie))\nforall x (Nutrify(x, laural) -> Nutrify(laural, dannie))\nforall x (Iron(x, laural) and Nutrify(x, laural) -> not Unsalaried(laural))\nPectineal(dannie) -> Rebuff(dannie, laural)\nNutrify(laural, dannie) -> not Mesmerized(laural)\nforall x (Iron(x, dannie) -> not Mesmerized(dannie))\nforall x (Iron(x, dannie) -> Iron(dannie, laural))\nforall x (Nutrify(x, laural) and not Mesmerized(laural) -> not Rebuff(x, dannie))\n\nnot Roughdried(dannie)\n\nnot Roughdried(dannie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The marybelle innervate the virgina. The marybelle is delusive. The marybelle is phreatic. The marybelle derange the virgina. The virgina is not delusive. The virgina is not auctorial. The virgina dissect the marybelle. If something is deist and not phreatic then it derange the virgina. If something dissect the marybelle then the marybelle dissect the virgina. If something derange the marybelle and it dissect the marybelle then the marybelle is not deist. If the virgina is aryan then the virgina innervate the marybelle. If the marybelle dissect the virgina then the marybelle is not auctorial. If something derange the virgina then the virgina is not auctorial. If something derange the virgina then the virgina derange the marybelle. If something dissect the marybelle and the marybelle is not auctorial then it does not eat the virgina. The marybelle dissect the marybelle.", "logic": "\nInnervate(marybelle, virgina)\nDelusive(marybelle)\nPhreatic(marybelle)\nDerange(marybelle, virgina)\nnot Delusive(virgina)\nnot Auctorial(virgina)\nDissect(virgina, marybelle)\nforall x (Deist(x) and not Phreatic(x) -> Derange(x, virgina))\nforall x (Dissect(x, marybelle) -> Dissect(marybelle, virgina))\nforall x (Derange(x, marybelle) and Dissect(x, marybelle) -> not Deist(marybelle))\nAryan(virgina) -> Innervate(virgina, marybelle)\nDissect(marybelle, virgina) -> not Auctorial(marybelle)\nforall x (Derange(x, virgina) -> not Auctorial(virgina))\nforall x (Derange(x, virgina) -> Derange(virgina, marybelle))\nforall x (Dissect(x, marybelle) and not Auctorial(marybelle) -> not Innervate(x, virgina))\n\nDissect(marybelle, marybelle)\n\nDissect(marybelle, marybelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "Elihu is leibnizian. Meghann is leibnizian. Berkeley is wavering. Byram is healthier. All outbred people are healthier. If someone is outbred and healthier then they are original. All wavering people are outbred. Berkeley is wavering.", "logic": "\nLeibnizian(elihu)\nLeibnizian(meghann)\nWavering(berkeley)\nHealthier(byram)\nforall x (Outbred(x) -> Healthier(x))\nforall x (Outbred(x) and Healthier(x) -> Original(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Outbred(x))\n\nWavering(berkeley)\n\ntherefore Wavering(berkeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Madelena is plural. Roosevelt is plural. Gloriane is soaked. Ernesto is willful. All unfathomed people are willful. If someone is unfathomed and willful then they are offending. All soaked people are unfathomed. Madelena is not plural.", "logic": "\nPlural(madelena)\nPlural(roosevelt)\nSoaked(gloriane)\nWillful(ernesto)\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Willful(x))\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) and Willful(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Soaked(x) -> Unfathomed(x))\n\nnot Plural(madelena)\n\ntherefore Plural(madelena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Zacharia is scaled. Simone is scaled. Trescha is desirable. Albert is looseleaf. All keynesian people are looseleaf. If someone is keynesian and looseleaf then they are kyphotic. All desirable people are keynesian. Trescha is keynesian.", "logic": "\nScaled(zacharia)\nScaled(simone)\nDesirable(trescha)\nLooseleaf(albert)\nforall x (Keynesian(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Keynesian(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Kyphotic(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) -> Keynesian(x))\n\nKeynesian(trescha)\n\nDesirable(trescha) and forall x (Desirable(x) -> Keynesian(x)) -> therefore Keynesian(trescha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Nunzio is imperial. Sonia is imperial. Zerk is cuneiform. Chiarra is unearthly. All berrylike people are unearthly. If someone is berrylike and unearthly then they are profane. All cuneiform people are berrylike. Zerk is not berrylike.", "logic": "\nImperial(nunzio)\nImperial(sonia)\nCuneiform(zerk)\nUnearthly(chiarra)\nforall x (Berrylike(x) -> Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and Unearthly(x) -> Profane(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Berrylike(x))\n\nnot Berrylike(zerk)\n\nCuneiform(zerk) and forall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Berrylike(x)) -> therefore Berrylike(zerk)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Marabel is ninefold. Marjie is ninefold. Rocky is heinous. Stearne is stratified. All unsure people are stratified. If someone is unsure and stratified then they are xxxiii. All heinous people are unsure. Rocky is stratified.", "logic": "\nNinefold(marabel)\nNinefold(marjie)\nHeinous(rocky)\nStratified(stearne)\nforall x (Unsure(x) -> Stratified(x))\nforall x (Unsure(x) and Stratified(x) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Heinous(x) -> Unsure(x))\n\nStratified(rocky)\n\nHeinous(rocky) and forall x (Heinous(x) -> Unsure(x)) -> therefore Unsure(rocky) Unsure(rocky) and forall x (Unsure(x) -> Stratified(x)) -> therefore Stratified(rocky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Ingeborg is supporting. Jacinthe is supporting. Karla is solvable. Constanta is prismatic. All overseas people are prismatic. If someone is overseas and prismatic then they are outmost. All solvable people are overseas. Karla is not prismatic.", "logic": "\nSupporting(ingeborg)\nSupporting(jacinthe)\nSolvable(karla)\nPrismatic(constanta)\nforall x (Overseas(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Overseas(x) and Prismatic(x) -> Outmost(x))\nforall x (Solvable(x) -> Overseas(x))\n\nnot Prismatic(karla)\n\nSolvable(karla) and forall x (Solvable(x) -> Overseas(x)) -> therefore Overseas(karla) Overseas(karla) and forall x (Overseas(x) -> Prismatic(x)) -> therefore Prismatic(karla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Urban is troublous. Nari is troublous. Laurie is prodigious. Xerxes is ruled. All dactylic people are ruled. If someone is dactylic and ruled then they are manned. All prodigious people are dactylic. Laurie is manned.", "logic": "\nTroublous(urban)\nTroublous(nari)\nProdigious(laurie)\nRuled(xerxes)\nforall x (Dactylic(x) -> Ruled(x))\nforall x (Dactylic(x) and Ruled(x) -> Manned(x))\nforall x (Prodigious(x) -> Dactylic(x))\n\nManned(laurie)\n\nProdigious(laurie) and forall x (Prodigious(x) -> Dactylic(x)) -> therefore Dactylic(laurie) Prodigious(laurie) and forall x (Prodigious(x) -> Dactylic(x)) -> therefore Dactylic(laurie) Dactylic(laurie) and forall x (Dactylic(x) -> Ruled(x)) -> therefore Ruled(laurie) Dactylic(laurie) and Ruled(laurie) and forall x (Dactylic(x) and Ruled(x) -> Manned(x)) -> therefore Manned(laurie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Camala is opulent. Dorothea is opulent. Katina is reedlike. Bary is exergonic. All slim people are exergonic. If someone is slim and exergonic then they are chartreuse. All reedlike people are slim. Katina is not chartreuse.", "logic": "\nOpulent(camala)\nOpulent(dorothea)\nReedlike(katina)\nExergonic(bary)\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Exergonic(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) and Exergonic(x) -> Chartreuse(x))\nforall x (Reedlike(x) -> Slim(x))\n\nnot Chartreuse(katina)\n\nReedlike(katina) and forall x (Reedlike(x) -> Slim(x)) -> therefore Slim(katina) Reedlike(katina) and forall x (Reedlike(x) -> Slim(x)) -> therefore Slim(katina) Slim(katina) and forall x (Slim(x) -> Exergonic(x)) -> therefore Exergonic(katina) Slim(katina) and Exergonic(katina) and forall x (Slim(x) and Exergonic(x) -> Chartreuse(x)) -> therefore Chartreuse(katina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Jere is acidotic. Dyann is acidotic. Nadine is pilary. Mayer is vehicular. All worldwide people are vehicular. If someone is worldwide and vehicular then they are loud. All pilary people are worldwide. Dyann is not worldwide.", "logic": "\nAcidotic(jere)\nAcidotic(dyann)\nPilary(nadine)\nVehicular(mayer)\nforall x (Worldwide(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Worldwide(x) and Vehicular(x) -> Loud(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Worldwide(x))\n\nnot Worldwide(dyann)\n\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Worldwide(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Tasha is catalytic. Pammy is catalytic. Kaylil is copious. Radcliffe is semantic. All separate people are semantic. If someone is separate and semantic then they are blooming. All copious people are separate. Radcliffe is blooming.", "logic": "\nCatalytic(tasha)\nCatalytic(pammy)\nCopious(kaylil)\nSemantic(radcliffe)\nforall x (Separate(x) -> Semantic(x))\nforall x (Separate(x) and Semantic(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Separate(x))\n\nBlooming(radcliffe)\n\nforall x (Separate(x) and Semantic(x) -> Blooming(x)) <- forall x (Copious(x) -> Separate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Juline is bellying. Laurella is bellying. Agathe is pardonable. Alley is enlivening. All identical people are enlivening. If someone is identical and enlivening then they are alacritous. All pardonable people are identical. Laurella is not alacritous.", "logic": "\nBellying(juline)\nBellying(laurella)\nPardonable(agathe)\nEnlivening(alley)\nforall x (Identical(x) -> Enlivening(x))\nforall x (Identical(x) and Enlivening(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Pardonable(x) -> Identical(x))\n\nnot Alacritous(laurella)\n\nforall x (Identical(x) and Enlivening(x) -> Alacritous(x)) <- forall x (Pardonable(x) -> Identical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Eleanor is neuter. Adara is neuter. Etti is toothless. Markos is poignant. All megascopic people are poignant. If someone is megascopic and poignant then they are dietetic. All toothless people are megascopic. Eleanor is poignant.", "logic": "\nNeuter(eleanor)\nNeuter(adara)\nToothless(etti)\nPoignant(markos)\nforall x (Megascopic(x) -> Poignant(x))\nforall x (Megascopic(x) and Poignant(x) -> Dietetic(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Megascopic(x))\n\nPoignant(eleanor)\n\nforall x (Megascopic(x) -> Poignant(x)) <- forall x (Toothless(x) -> Megascopic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Mohamed is punitory. Kincaid is punitory. Maye is unreported. Tamera is surmisable. All guileless people are surmisable. If someone is guileless and surmisable then they are yellowish. All unreported people are guileless. Mohamed is not unreported.", "logic": "\nPunitory(mohamed)\nPunitory(kincaid)\nUnreported(maye)\nSurmisable(tamera)\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) and Surmisable(x) -> Yellowish(x))\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Guileless(x))\n\nnot Unreported(mohamed)\n\nnot Unreported(mohamed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Marlene is vanilla. Nathalia is vanilla. Lisbeth is immoral. Lennie is figural. All headfirst people are figural. If someone is headfirst and figural then they are reliant. All immoral people are headfirst. Lisbeth is furry.", "logic": "\nVanilla(marlene)\nVanilla(nathalia)\nImmoral(lisbeth)\nFigural(lennie)\nforall x (Headfirst(x) -> Figural(x))\nforall x (Headfirst(x) and Figural(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Immoral(x) -> Headfirst(x))\n\nFurry(lisbeth)\n\nFurry(lisbeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Shannah is edified. Shepherd is edified. Amelina is able. Matilda is grungy. All reeking people are grungy. If someone is reeking and grungy then they are metabolic. All able people are reeking. Shannah is not furry.", "logic": "\nEdified(shannah)\nEdified(shepherd)\nAble(amelina)\nGrungy(matilda)\nforall x (Reeking(x) -> Grungy(x))\nforall x (Reeking(x) and Grungy(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Able(x) -> Reeking(x))\n\nnot Furry(shannah)\n\nnot Furry(shannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Betsy is underage. Tabbatha is underage. Brynne is ferric. Zachariah is cragged. All equivalent people are cragged. If someone is equivalent and cragged then they are benzenoid. All ferric people are equivalent. Zachariah is quiet.", "logic": "\nUnderage(betsy)\nUnderage(tabbatha)\nFerric(brynne)\nCragged(zachariah)\nforall x (Equivalent(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Equivalent(x) and Cragged(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> Equivalent(x))\n\nQuiet(zachariah)\n\nQuiet(zachariah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "The julianne yack the janeta. The julianne gasify the else. The julianne is cruciform. The julianne does not like the janeta. The julianne disobey the else. The janeta disobey the else. The else does not eat the julianne. The else gasify the janeta. The else is brahminic. The else is squint. If someone yack the else and they eat the julianne then the else is squint. If someone yack the else and they chase the julianne then the julianne gasify the janeta. If the else gasify the julianne and the julianne is squint then the julianne is cruciform. If someone disobey the else then they do not chase the julianne. If someone is brahminic and they do not chase the else then they do not eat the else. If someone disobey the else and the else yack the janeta then the janeta gasify the julianne. If the janeta does not chase the julianne then the janeta gasify the else. If someone gasify the else then they eat the janeta. The else is brahminic.", "logic": "\nYack(julianne, janeta)\nGasify(julianne, else)\nCruciform(julianne)\nnot Disobey(julianne, janeta)\nDisobey(julianne, else)\nDisobey(janeta, else)\nnot Gasify(else, julianne)\nGasify(else, janeta)\nBrahminic(else)\nSquint(else)\nforall x (Yack(x, else) and Gasify(x, julianne) -> Squint(else))\nforall x (Yack(x, else) and Yack(x, julianne) -> Gasify(julianne, janeta))\nGasify(else, julianne) and Squint(julianne) -> Cruciform(julianne)\nforall x (Disobey(x, else) -> not Yack(x, julianne))\nforall x (Brahminic(x) and not Yack(x, else) -> not Gasify(x, else))\nforall x (Disobey(x, else) and Yack(else, janeta) -> Gasify(janeta, julianne))\nnot Yack(janeta, julianne) -> Gasify(janeta, else)\nforall x (Gasify(x, else) -> Gasify(x, janeta))\n\nBrahminic(else)\n\ntherefore Brahminic(else)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The brunhilde apply the mirelle. The brunhilde scribble the win. The brunhilde is circadian. The brunhilde does not like the mirelle. The brunhilde glamorise the win. The mirelle glamorise the win. The win does not eat the brunhilde. The win scribble the mirelle. The win is irritative. The win is shielded. If someone apply the win and they eat the brunhilde then the win is shielded. If someone apply the win and they chase the brunhilde then the brunhilde scribble the mirelle. If the win scribble the brunhilde and the brunhilde is shielded then the brunhilde is circadian. If someone glamorise the win then they do not chase the brunhilde. If someone is irritative and they do not chase the win then they do not eat the win. If someone glamorise the win and the win apply the mirelle then the mirelle scribble the brunhilde. If the mirelle does not chase the brunhilde then the mirelle scribble the win. If someone scribble the win then they eat the mirelle. The brunhilde does not chase the mirelle.", "logic": "\nApply(brunhilde, mirelle)\nScribble(brunhilde, win)\nCircadian(brunhilde)\nnot Glamorise(brunhilde, mirelle)\nGlamorise(brunhilde, win)\nGlamorise(mirelle, win)\nnot Scribble(win, brunhilde)\nScribble(win, mirelle)\nIrritative(win)\nShielded(win)\nforall x (Apply(x, win) and Scribble(x, brunhilde) -> Shielded(win))\nforall x (Apply(x, win) and Apply(x, brunhilde) -> Scribble(brunhilde, mirelle))\nScribble(win, brunhilde) and Shielded(brunhilde) -> Circadian(brunhilde)\nforall x (Glamorise(x, win) -> not Apply(x, brunhilde))\nforall x (Irritative(x) and not Apply(x, win) -> not Scribble(x, win))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, win) and Apply(win, mirelle) -> Scribble(mirelle, brunhilde))\nnot Apply(mirelle, brunhilde) -> Scribble(mirelle, win)\nforall x (Scribble(x, win) -> Scribble(x, mirelle))\n\nnot Apply(brunhilde, mirelle)\n\ntherefore Apply(brunhilde, mirelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The tiffany ebonize the shea. The tiffany pace the helaine. The tiffany is warm. The tiffany does not like the shea. The tiffany smirk the helaine. The shea smirk the helaine. The helaine does not eat the tiffany. The helaine pace the shea. The helaine is triplex. The helaine is ovular. If someone ebonize the helaine and they eat the tiffany then the helaine is ovular. If someone ebonize the helaine and they chase the tiffany then the tiffany pace the shea. If the helaine pace the tiffany and the tiffany is ovular then the tiffany is warm. If someone smirk the helaine then they do not chase the tiffany. If someone is triplex and they do not chase the helaine then they do not eat the helaine. If someone smirk the helaine and the helaine ebonize the shea then the shea pace the tiffany. If the shea does not chase the tiffany then the shea pace the helaine. If someone pace the helaine then they eat the shea. The tiffany does not chase the tiffany.", "logic": "\nEbonize(tiffany, shea)\nPace(tiffany, helaine)\nWarm(tiffany)\nnot Smirk(tiffany, shea)\nSmirk(tiffany, helaine)\nSmirk(shea, helaine)\nnot Pace(helaine, tiffany)\nPace(helaine, shea)\nTriplex(helaine)\nOvular(helaine)\nforall x (Ebonize(x, helaine) and Pace(x, tiffany) -> Ovular(helaine))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, helaine) and Ebonize(x, tiffany) -> Pace(tiffany, shea))\nPace(helaine, tiffany) and Ovular(tiffany) -> Warm(tiffany)\nforall x (Smirk(x, helaine) -> not Ebonize(x, tiffany))\nforall x (Triplex(x) and not Ebonize(x, helaine) -> not Pace(x, helaine))\nforall x (Smirk(x, helaine) and Ebonize(helaine, shea) -> Pace(shea, tiffany))\nnot Ebonize(shea, tiffany) -> Pace(shea, helaine)\nforall x (Pace(x, helaine) -> Pace(x, shea))\n\nnot Ebonize(tiffany, tiffany)\n\nSmirk(tiffany, helaine) and forall x (Smirk(x, helaine) -> not Ebonize(x, tiffany)) -> therefore not Ebonize(tiffany, tiffany)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The wilmette ptyalise the heida. The wilmette visualize the merell. The wilmette is forte. The wilmette does not like the heida. The wilmette differ the merell. The heida differ the merell. The merell does not eat the wilmette. The merell visualize the heida. The merell is calloused. The merell is ladened. If someone ptyalise the merell and they eat the wilmette then the merell is ladened. If someone ptyalise the merell and they chase the wilmette then the wilmette visualize the heida. If the merell visualize the wilmette and the wilmette is ladened then the wilmette is forte. If someone differ the merell then they do not chase the wilmette. If someone is calloused and they do not chase the merell then they do not eat the merell. If someone differ the merell and the merell ptyalise the heida then the heida visualize the wilmette. If the heida does not chase the wilmette then the heida visualize the merell. If someone visualize the merell then they eat the heida. The heida ptyalise the wilmette.", "logic": "\nPtyalise(wilmette, heida)\nVisualize(wilmette, merell)\nForte(wilmette)\nnot Differ(wilmette, heida)\nDiffer(wilmette, merell)\nDiffer(heida, merell)\nnot Visualize(merell, wilmette)\nVisualize(merell, heida)\nCalloused(merell)\nLadened(merell)\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, merell) and Visualize(x, wilmette) -> Ladened(merell))\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, merell) and Ptyalise(x, wilmette) -> Visualize(wilmette, heida))\nVisualize(merell, wilmette) and Ladened(wilmette) -> Forte(wilmette)\nforall x (Differ(x, merell) -> not Ptyalise(x, wilmette))\nforall x (Calloused(x) and not Ptyalise(x, merell) -> not Visualize(x, merell))\nforall x (Differ(x, merell) and Ptyalise(merell, heida) -> Visualize(heida, wilmette))\nnot Ptyalise(heida, wilmette) -> Visualize(heida, merell)\nforall x (Visualize(x, merell) -> Visualize(x, heida))\n\nPtyalise(heida, wilmette)\n\nDiffer(heida, merell) and forall x (Differ(x, merell) -> not Ptyalise(x, wilmette)) -> therefore not Ptyalise(heida, wilmette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The brice anele the amalia. The brice pulsate the clement. The brice is midi. The brice does not like the amalia. The brice keen the clement. The amalia keen the clement. The clement does not eat the brice. The clement pulsate the amalia. The clement is whorled. The clement is eccrine. If someone anele the clement and they eat the brice then the clement is eccrine. If someone anele the clement and they chase the brice then the brice pulsate the amalia. If the clement pulsate the brice and the brice is eccrine then the brice is midi. If someone keen the clement then they do not chase the brice. If someone is whorled and they do not chase the clement then they do not eat the clement. If someone keen the clement and the clement anele the amalia then the amalia pulsate the brice. If the amalia does not chase the brice then the amalia pulsate the clement. If someone pulsate the clement then they eat the amalia. The amalia pulsate the clement.", "logic": "\nAnele(brice, amalia)\nPulsate(brice, clement)\nMidi(brice)\nnot Keen(brice, amalia)\nKeen(brice, clement)\nKeen(amalia, clement)\nnot Pulsate(clement, brice)\nPulsate(clement, amalia)\nWhorled(clement)\nEccrine(clement)\nforall x (Anele(x, clement) and Pulsate(x, brice) -> Eccrine(clement))\nforall x (Anele(x, clement) and Anele(x, brice) -> Pulsate(brice, amalia))\nPulsate(clement, brice) and Eccrine(brice) -> Midi(brice)\nforall x (Keen(x, clement) -> not Anele(x, brice))\nforall x (Whorled(x) and not Anele(x, clement) -> not Pulsate(x, clement))\nforall x (Keen(x, clement) and Anele(clement, amalia) -> Pulsate(amalia, brice))\nnot Anele(amalia, brice) -> Pulsate(amalia, clement)\nforall x (Pulsate(x, clement) -> Pulsate(x, amalia))\n\nPulsate(amalia, clement)\n\nKeen(amalia, clement) and forall x (Keen(x, clement) -> not Anele(x, brice)) -> therefore not Anele(amalia, brice) not Anele(amalia, brice) and not Anele(amalia, brice) -> Pulsate(amalia, clement) -> therefore Pulsate(amalia, clement)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The hamilton pension the abner. The hamilton dishearten the calvin. The hamilton is forfeit. The hamilton does not like the abner. The hamilton welcome the calvin. The abner welcome the calvin. The calvin does not eat the hamilton. The calvin dishearten the abner. The calvin is evident. The calvin is tonic. If someone pension the calvin and they eat the hamilton then the calvin is tonic. If someone pension the calvin and they chase the hamilton then the hamilton dishearten the abner. If the calvin dishearten the hamilton and the hamilton is tonic then the hamilton is forfeit. If someone welcome the calvin then they do not chase the hamilton. If someone is evident and they do not chase the calvin then they do not eat the calvin. If someone welcome the calvin and the calvin pension the abner then the abner dishearten the hamilton. If the abner does not chase the hamilton then the abner dishearten the calvin. If someone dishearten the calvin then they eat the abner. The abner does not eat the calvin.", "logic": "\nPension(hamilton, abner)\nDishearten(hamilton, calvin)\nForfeit(hamilton)\nnot Welcome(hamilton, abner)\nWelcome(hamilton, calvin)\nWelcome(abner, calvin)\nnot Dishearten(calvin, hamilton)\nDishearten(calvin, abner)\nEvident(calvin)\nTonic(calvin)\nforall x (Pension(x, calvin) and Dishearten(x, hamilton) -> Tonic(calvin))\nforall x (Pension(x, calvin) and Pension(x, hamilton) -> Dishearten(hamilton, abner))\nDishearten(calvin, hamilton) and Tonic(hamilton) -> Forfeit(hamilton)\nforall x (Welcome(x, calvin) -> not Pension(x, hamilton))\nforall x (Evident(x) and not Pension(x, calvin) -> not Dishearten(x, calvin))\nforall x (Welcome(x, calvin) and Pension(calvin, abner) -> Dishearten(abner, hamilton))\nnot Pension(abner, hamilton) -> Dishearten(abner, calvin)\nforall x (Dishearten(x, calvin) -> Dishearten(x, abner))\n\nnot Dishearten(abner, calvin)\n\nWelcome(abner, calvin) and forall x (Welcome(x, calvin) -> not Pension(x, hamilton)) -> therefore not Pension(abner, hamilton) not Pension(abner, hamilton) and not Pension(abner, hamilton) -> Dishearten(abner, calvin) -> therefore Dishearten(abner, calvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The marys fuel the roni. The marys test the everett. The marys is scotch. The marys does not like the roni. The marys quantise the everett. The roni quantise the everett. The everett does not eat the marys. The everett test the roni. The everett is palatal. The everett is euphoric. If someone fuel the everett and they eat the marys then the everett is euphoric. If someone fuel the everett and they chase the marys then the marys test the roni. If the everett test the marys and the marys is euphoric then the marys is scotch. If someone quantise the everett then they do not chase the marys. If someone is palatal and they do not chase the everett then they do not eat the everett. If someone quantise the everett and the everett fuel the roni then the roni test the marys. If the roni does not chase the marys then the roni test the everett. If someone test the everett then they eat the roni. The roni test the roni.", "logic": "\nFuel(marys, roni)\nTest(marys, everett)\nScotch(marys)\nnot Quantise(marys, roni)\nQuantise(marys, everett)\nQuantise(roni, everett)\nnot Test(everett, marys)\nTest(everett, roni)\nPalatal(everett)\nEuphoric(everett)\nforall x (Fuel(x, everett) and Test(x, marys) -> Euphoric(everett))\nforall x (Fuel(x, everett) and Fuel(x, marys) -> Test(marys, roni))\nTest(everett, marys) and Euphoric(marys) -> Scotch(marys)\nforall x (Quantise(x, everett) -> not Fuel(x, marys))\nforall x (Palatal(x) and not Fuel(x, everett) -> not Test(x, everett))\nforall x (Quantise(x, everett) and Fuel(everett, roni) -> Test(roni, marys))\nnot Fuel(roni, marys) -> Test(roni, everett)\nforall x (Test(x, everett) -> Test(x, roni))\n\nTest(roni, roni)\n\nQuantise(roni, everett) and forall x (Quantise(x, everett) -> not Fuel(x, marys)) -> therefore not Fuel(roni, marys) not Fuel(roni, marys) and not Fuel(roni, marys) -> Test(roni, everett) -> therefore Test(roni, everett) Test(roni, everett) and forall x (Test(x, everett) -> Test(x, roni)) -> therefore Test(roni, roni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The jake trifle the jamey. The jake oppugn the paola. The jake is laureate. The jake does not like the jamey. The jake intern the paola. The jamey intern the paola. The paola does not eat the jake. The paola oppugn the jamey. The paola is deflated. The paola is onymous. If someone trifle the paola and they eat the jake then the paola is onymous. If someone trifle the paola and they chase the jake then the jake oppugn the jamey. If the paola oppugn the jake and the jake is onymous then the jake is laureate. If someone intern the paola then they do not chase the jake. If someone is deflated and they do not chase the paola then they do not eat the paola. If someone intern the paola and the paola trifle the jamey then the jamey oppugn the jake. If the jamey does not chase the jake then the jamey oppugn the paola. If someone oppugn the paola then they eat the jamey. The jamey does not eat the jamey.", "logic": "\nTrifle(jake, jamey)\nOppugn(jake, paola)\nLaureate(jake)\nnot Intern(jake, jamey)\nIntern(jake, paola)\nIntern(jamey, paola)\nnot Oppugn(paola, jake)\nOppugn(paola, jamey)\nDeflated(paola)\nOnymous(paola)\nforall x (Trifle(x, paola) and Oppugn(x, jake) -> Onymous(paola))\nforall x (Trifle(x, paola) and Trifle(x, jake) -> Oppugn(jake, jamey))\nOppugn(paola, jake) and Onymous(jake) -> Laureate(jake)\nforall x (Intern(x, paola) -> not Trifle(x, jake))\nforall x (Deflated(x) and not Trifle(x, paola) -> not Oppugn(x, paola))\nforall x (Intern(x, paola) and Trifle(paola, jamey) -> Oppugn(jamey, jake))\nnot Trifle(jamey, jake) -> Oppugn(jamey, paola)\nforall x (Oppugn(x, paola) -> Oppugn(x, jamey))\n\nnot Oppugn(jamey, jamey)\n\nIntern(jamey, paola) and forall x (Intern(x, paola) -> not Trifle(x, jake)) -> therefore not Trifle(jamey, jake) not Trifle(jamey, jake) and not Trifle(jamey, jake) -> Oppugn(jamey, paola) -> therefore Oppugn(jamey, paola) Oppugn(jamey, paola) and forall x (Oppugn(x, paola) -> Oppugn(x, jamey)) -> therefore Oppugn(jamey, jamey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The emilio victual the estella. The emilio foment the jeanie. The emilio is tanned. The emilio does not like the estella. The emilio catechize the jeanie. The estella catechize the jeanie. The jeanie does not eat the emilio. The jeanie foment the estella. The jeanie is baltic. The jeanie is fouled. If someone victual the jeanie and they eat the emilio then the jeanie is fouled. If someone victual the jeanie and they chase the emilio then the emilio foment the estella. If the jeanie foment the emilio and the emilio is fouled then the emilio is tanned. If someone catechize the jeanie then they do not chase the emilio. If someone is baltic and they do not chase the jeanie then they do not eat the jeanie. If someone catechize the jeanie and the jeanie victual the estella then the estella foment the emilio. If the estella does not chase the emilio then the estella foment the jeanie. If someone foment the jeanie then they eat the estella. The estella does not eat the emilio.", "logic": "\nVictual(emilio, estella)\nFoment(emilio, jeanie)\nTanned(emilio)\nnot Catechize(emilio, estella)\nCatechize(emilio, jeanie)\nCatechize(estella, jeanie)\nnot Foment(jeanie, emilio)\nFoment(jeanie, estella)\nBaltic(jeanie)\nFouled(jeanie)\nforall x (Victual(x, jeanie) and Foment(x, emilio) -> Fouled(jeanie))\nforall x (Victual(x, jeanie) and Victual(x, emilio) -> Foment(emilio, estella))\nFoment(jeanie, emilio) and Fouled(emilio) -> Tanned(emilio)\nforall x (Catechize(x, jeanie) -> not Victual(x, emilio))\nforall x (Baltic(x) and not Victual(x, jeanie) -> not Foment(x, jeanie))\nforall x (Catechize(x, jeanie) and Victual(jeanie, estella) -> Foment(estella, emilio))\nnot Victual(estella, emilio) -> Foment(estella, jeanie)\nforall x (Foment(x, jeanie) -> Foment(x, estella))\n\nnot Foment(estella, emilio)\n\nforall x (Catechize(x, jeanie) and Victual(jeanie, estella) -> Foment(estella, emilio)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The dawson cling the zorro. The dawson club the jammie. The dawson is unliveable. The dawson does not like the zorro. The dawson swirl the jammie. The zorro swirl the jammie. The jammie does not eat the dawson. The jammie club the zorro. The jammie is unplanted. The jammie is tethered. If someone cling the jammie and they eat the dawson then the jammie is tethered. If someone cling the jammie and they chase the dawson then the dawson club the zorro. If the jammie club the dawson and the dawson is tethered then the dawson is unliveable. If someone swirl the jammie then they do not chase the dawson. If someone is unplanted and they do not chase the jammie then they do not eat the jammie. If someone swirl the jammie and the jammie cling the zorro then the zorro club the dawson. If the zorro does not chase the dawson then the zorro club the jammie. If someone club the jammie then they eat the zorro. The jammie club the jammie.", "logic": "\nCling(dawson, zorro)\nClub(dawson, jammie)\nUnliveable(dawson)\nnot Swirl(dawson, zorro)\nSwirl(dawson, jammie)\nSwirl(zorro, jammie)\nnot Club(jammie, dawson)\nClub(jammie, zorro)\nUnplanted(jammie)\nTethered(jammie)\nforall x (Cling(x, jammie) and Club(x, dawson) -> Tethered(jammie))\nforall x (Cling(x, jammie) and Cling(x, dawson) -> Club(dawson, zorro))\nClub(jammie, dawson) and Tethered(dawson) -> Unliveable(dawson)\nforall x (Swirl(x, jammie) -> not Cling(x, dawson))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) and not Cling(x, jammie) -> not Club(x, jammie))\nforall x (Swirl(x, jammie) and Cling(jammie, zorro) -> Club(zorro, dawson))\nnot Cling(zorro, dawson) -> Club(zorro, jammie)\nforall x (Club(x, jammie) -> Club(x, zorro))\n\nClub(jammie, jammie)\n\nClub(jammie, jammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The lev trek the emlynn. The lev foreshadow the mahesh. The lev is portuguese. The lev does not like the emlynn. The lev burgle the mahesh. The emlynn burgle the mahesh. The mahesh does not eat the lev. The mahesh foreshadow the emlynn. The mahesh is classy. The mahesh is sensed. If someone trek the mahesh and they eat the lev then the mahesh is sensed. If someone trek the mahesh and they chase the lev then the lev foreshadow the emlynn. If the mahesh foreshadow the lev and the lev is sensed then the lev is portuguese. If someone burgle the mahesh then they do not chase the lev. If someone is classy and they do not chase the mahesh then they do not eat the mahesh. If someone burgle the mahesh and the mahesh trek the emlynn then the emlynn foreshadow the lev. If the emlynn does not chase the lev then the emlynn foreshadow the mahesh. If someone foreshadow the mahesh then they eat the emlynn. The emlynn is not young.", "logic": "\nTrek(lev, emlynn)\nForeshadow(lev, mahesh)\nPortuguese(lev)\nnot Burgle(lev, emlynn)\nBurgle(lev, mahesh)\nBurgle(emlynn, mahesh)\nnot Foreshadow(mahesh, lev)\nForeshadow(mahesh, emlynn)\nClassy(mahesh)\nSensed(mahesh)\nforall x (Trek(x, mahesh) and Foreshadow(x, lev) -> Sensed(mahesh))\nforall x (Trek(x, mahesh) and Trek(x, lev) -> Foreshadow(lev, emlynn))\nForeshadow(mahesh, lev) and Sensed(lev) -> Portuguese(lev)\nforall x (Burgle(x, mahesh) -> not Trek(x, lev))\nforall x (Classy(x) and not Trek(x, mahesh) -> not Foreshadow(x, mahesh))\nforall x (Burgle(x, mahesh) and Trek(mahesh, emlynn) -> Foreshadow(emlynn, lev))\nnot Trek(emlynn, lev) -> Foreshadow(emlynn, mahesh)\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, mahesh) -> Foreshadow(x, emlynn))\n\nnot Young(emlynn)\n\nnot Young(emlynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The genovera long the sarita. The genovera campaign the andria. The genovera is nurturant. The genovera does not like the sarita. The genovera lure the andria. The sarita lure the andria. The andria does not eat the genovera. The andria campaign the sarita. The andria is doleful. The andria is mystifying. If someone long the andria and they eat the genovera then the andria is mystifying. If someone long the andria and they chase the genovera then the genovera campaign the sarita. If the andria campaign the genovera and the genovera is mystifying then the genovera is nurturant. If someone lure the andria then they do not chase the genovera. If someone is doleful and they do not chase the andria then they do not eat the andria. If someone lure the andria and the andria long the sarita then the sarita campaign the genovera. If the sarita does not chase the genovera then the sarita campaign the andria. If someone campaign the andria then they eat the sarita. The genovera is doleful.", "logic": "\nLong(genovera, sarita)\nCampaign(genovera, andria)\nNurturant(genovera)\nnot Lure(genovera, sarita)\nLure(genovera, andria)\nLure(sarita, andria)\nnot Campaign(andria, genovera)\nCampaign(andria, sarita)\nDoleful(andria)\nMystifying(andria)\nforall x (Long(x, andria) and Campaign(x, genovera) -> Mystifying(andria))\nforall x (Long(x, andria) and Long(x, genovera) -> Campaign(genovera, sarita))\nCampaign(andria, genovera) and Mystifying(genovera) -> Nurturant(genovera)\nforall x (Lure(x, andria) -> not Long(x, genovera))\nforall x (Doleful(x) and not Long(x, andria) -> not Campaign(x, andria))\nforall x (Lure(x, andria) and Long(andria, sarita) -> Campaign(sarita, genovera))\nnot Long(sarita, genovera) -> Campaign(sarita, andria)\nforall x (Campaign(x, andria) -> Campaign(x, sarita))\n\nDoleful(genovera)\n\nDoleful(genovera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The emmy odorize the ferdie. The emmy pronate the jeannie. The emmy is lowbrow. The emmy does not like the ferdie. The emmy supercede the jeannie. The ferdie supercede the jeannie. The jeannie does not eat the emmy. The jeannie pronate the ferdie. The jeannie is plaintive. The jeannie is humified. If someone odorize the jeannie and they eat the emmy then the jeannie is humified. If someone odorize the jeannie and they chase the emmy then the emmy pronate the ferdie. If the jeannie pronate the emmy and the emmy is humified then the emmy is lowbrow. If someone supercede the jeannie then they do not chase the emmy. If someone is plaintive and they do not chase the jeannie then they do not eat the jeannie. If someone supercede the jeannie and the jeannie odorize the ferdie then the ferdie pronate the emmy. If the ferdie does not chase the emmy then the ferdie pronate the jeannie. If someone pronate the jeannie then they eat the ferdie. The emmy is not humified.", "logic": "\nOdorize(emmy, ferdie)\nPronate(emmy, jeannie)\nLowbrow(emmy)\nnot Supercede(emmy, ferdie)\nSupercede(emmy, jeannie)\nSupercede(ferdie, jeannie)\nnot Pronate(jeannie, emmy)\nPronate(jeannie, ferdie)\nPlaintive(jeannie)\nHumified(jeannie)\nforall x (Odorize(x, jeannie) and Pronate(x, emmy) -> Humified(jeannie))\nforall x (Odorize(x, jeannie) and Odorize(x, emmy) -> Pronate(emmy, ferdie))\nPronate(jeannie, emmy) and Humified(emmy) -> Lowbrow(emmy)\nforall x (Supercede(x, jeannie) -> not Odorize(x, emmy))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) and not Odorize(x, jeannie) -> not Pronate(x, jeannie))\nforall x (Supercede(x, jeannie) and Odorize(jeannie, ferdie) -> Pronate(ferdie, emmy))\nnot Odorize(ferdie, emmy) -> Pronate(ferdie, jeannie)\nforall x (Pronate(x, jeannie) -> Pronate(x, ferdie))\n\nnot Humified(emmy)\n\nnot Humified(emmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The virgie excrete the diane. The virgie clinch the honor. The virgie is porcine. The virgie does not like the diane. The virgie sanitate the honor. The diane sanitate the honor. The honor does not eat the virgie. The honor clinch the diane. The honor is unmined. The honor is different. If someone excrete the honor and they eat the virgie then the honor is different. If someone excrete the honor and they chase the virgie then the virgie clinch the diane. If the honor clinch the virgie and the virgie is different then the virgie is porcine. If someone sanitate the honor then they do not chase the virgie. If someone is unmined and they do not chase the honor then they do not eat the honor. If someone sanitate the honor and the honor excrete the diane then the diane clinch the virgie. If the diane does not chase the virgie then the diane clinch the honor. If someone clinch the honor then they eat the diane. The virgie excrete the honor.", "logic": "\nExcrete(virgie, diane)\nClinch(virgie, honor)\nPorcine(virgie)\nnot Sanitate(virgie, diane)\nSanitate(virgie, honor)\nSanitate(diane, honor)\nnot Clinch(honor, virgie)\nClinch(honor, diane)\nUnmined(honor)\nDifferent(honor)\nforall x (Excrete(x, honor) and Clinch(x, virgie) -> Different(honor))\nforall x (Excrete(x, honor) and Excrete(x, virgie) -> Clinch(virgie, diane))\nClinch(honor, virgie) and Different(virgie) -> Porcine(virgie)\nforall x (Sanitate(x, honor) -> not Excrete(x, virgie))\nforall x (Unmined(x) and not Excrete(x, honor) -> not Clinch(x, honor))\nforall x (Sanitate(x, honor) and Excrete(honor, diane) -> Clinch(diane, virgie))\nnot Excrete(diane, virgie) -> Clinch(diane, honor)\nforall x (Clinch(x, honor) -> Clinch(x, diane))\n\nExcrete(virgie, honor)\n\nExcrete(virgie, honor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The ardis acquire the thorstein. The ardis liaise the lauraine. The ardis is graduate. The ardis does not like the thorstein. The ardis detract the lauraine. The thorstein detract the lauraine. The lauraine does not eat the ardis. The lauraine liaise the thorstein. The lauraine is squabby. The lauraine is depressant. If someone acquire the lauraine and they eat the ardis then the lauraine is depressant. If someone acquire the lauraine and they chase the ardis then the ardis liaise the thorstein. If the lauraine liaise the ardis and the ardis is depressant then the ardis is graduate. If someone detract the lauraine then they do not chase the ardis. If someone is squabby and they do not chase the lauraine then they do not eat the lauraine. If someone detract the lauraine and the lauraine acquire the thorstein then the thorstein liaise the ardis. If the thorstein does not chase the ardis then the thorstein liaise the lauraine. If someone liaise the lauraine then they eat the thorstein. The ardis is not green.", "logic": "\nAcquire(ardis, thorstein)\nLiaise(ardis, lauraine)\nGraduate(ardis)\nnot Detract(ardis, thorstein)\nDetract(ardis, lauraine)\nDetract(thorstein, lauraine)\nnot Liaise(lauraine, ardis)\nLiaise(lauraine, thorstein)\nSquabby(lauraine)\nDepressant(lauraine)\nforall x (Acquire(x, lauraine) and Liaise(x, ardis) -> Depressant(lauraine))\nforall x (Acquire(x, lauraine) and Acquire(x, ardis) -> Liaise(ardis, thorstein))\nLiaise(lauraine, ardis) and Depressant(ardis) -> Graduate(ardis)\nforall x (Detract(x, lauraine) -> not Acquire(x, ardis))\nforall x (Squabby(x) and not Acquire(x, lauraine) -> not Liaise(x, lauraine))\nforall x (Detract(x, lauraine) and Acquire(lauraine, thorstein) -> Liaise(thorstein, ardis))\nnot Acquire(thorstein, ardis) -> Liaise(thorstein, lauraine)\nforall x (Liaise(x, lauraine) -> Liaise(x, thorstein))\n\nnot Green(ardis)\n\nnot Green(ardis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The chadwick atomize the dorella. The chadwick bequeath the emanuel. The chadwick is mussy. The chadwick does not like the dorella. The chadwick besiege the emanuel. The dorella besiege the emanuel. The emanuel does not eat the chadwick. The emanuel bequeath the dorella. The emanuel is maplelike. The emanuel is valiant. If someone atomize the emanuel and they eat the chadwick then the emanuel is valiant. If someone atomize the emanuel and they chase the chadwick then the chadwick bequeath the dorella. If the emanuel bequeath the chadwick and the chadwick is valiant then the chadwick is mussy. If someone besiege the emanuel then they do not chase the chadwick. If someone is maplelike and they do not chase the emanuel then they do not eat the emanuel. If someone besiege the emanuel and the emanuel atomize the dorella then the dorella bequeath the chadwick. If the dorella does not chase the chadwick then the dorella bequeath the emanuel. If someone bequeath the emanuel then they eat the dorella. The emanuel is young.", "logic": "\nAtomize(chadwick, dorella)\nBequeath(chadwick, emanuel)\nMussy(chadwick)\nnot Besiege(chadwick, dorella)\nBesiege(chadwick, emanuel)\nBesiege(dorella, emanuel)\nnot Bequeath(emanuel, chadwick)\nBequeath(emanuel, dorella)\nMaplelike(emanuel)\nValiant(emanuel)\nforall x (Atomize(x, emanuel) and Bequeath(x, chadwick) -> Valiant(emanuel))\nforall x (Atomize(x, emanuel) and Atomize(x, chadwick) -> Bequeath(chadwick, dorella))\nBequeath(emanuel, chadwick) and Valiant(chadwick) -> Mussy(chadwick)\nforall x (Besiege(x, emanuel) -> not Atomize(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Maplelike(x) and not Atomize(x, emanuel) -> not Bequeath(x, emanuel))\nforall x (Besiege(x, emanuel) and Atomize(emanuel, dorella) -> Bequeath(dorella, chadwick))\nnot Atomize(dorella, chadwick) -> Bequeath(dorella, emanuel)\nforall x (Bequeath(x, emanuel) -> Bequeath(x, dorella))\n\nYoung(emanuel)\n\nYoung(emanuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "Andie is encircled. Andie is miraculous. Andie is slumbrous. Andie is crying. Andie is not madagascan. Jotham is encircled. Jotham is madagascan. Jotham is decompound. Jotham is plaintive. Solly is crying. Solly is plaintive. Ronica is miraculous. Ronica is slumbrous. Ronica is crying. Ronica is madagascan. If Ronica is crying then Ronica is slumbrous. If something is plaintive then it is slumbrous. All slumbrous things are decompound. If something is plaintive and slumbrous then it is miraculous. If Solly is decompound then Solly is encircled. If something is plaintive then it is crying. Andie is not madagascan.", "logic": "\nEncircled(andie)\nMiraculous(andie)\nSlumbrous(andie)\nCrying(andie)\nnot Madagascan(andie)\nEncircled(jotham)\nMadagascan(jotham)\nDecompound(jotham)\nPlaintive(jotham)\nCrying(solly)\nPlaintive(solly)\nMiraculous(ronica)\nSlumbrous(ronica)\nCrying(ronica)\nMadagascan(ronica)\nCrying(ronica) -> Slumbrous(ronica)\nforall x (Plaintive(x) -> Slumbrous(x))\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) -> Decompound(x))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) and Slumbrous(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nDecompound(solly) -> Encircled(solly)\nforall x (Plaintive(x) -> Crying(x))\n\nnot Madagascan(andie)\n\ntherefore not Madagascan(andie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Adara is billowy. Adara is torn. Adara is postural. Adara is hygienic. Adara is not glace. Leticia is billowy. Leticia is glace. Leticia is tegular. Leticia is unrealised. Kelsy is hygienic. Kelsy is unrealised. Gwenny is torn. Gwenny is postural. Gwenny is hygienic. Gwenny is glace. If Gwenny is hygienic then Gwenny is postural. If something is unrealised then it is postural. All postural things are tegular. If something is unrealised and postural then it is torn. If Kelsy is tegular then Kelsy is billowy. If something is unrealised then it is hygienic. Gwenny is not hygienic.", "logic": "\nBillowy(adara)\nTorn(adara)\nPostural(adara)\nHygienic(adara)\nnot Glace(adara)\nBillowy(leticia)\nGlace(leticia)\nTegular(leticia)\nUnrealised(leticia)\nHygienic(kelsy)\nUnrealised(kelsy)\nTorn(gwenny)\nPostural(gwenny)\nHygienic(gwenny)\nGlace(gwenny)\nHygienic(gwenny) -> Postural(gwenny)\nforall x (Unrealised(x) -> Postural(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) -> Tegular(x))\nforall x (Unrealised(x) and Postural(x) -> Torn(x))\nTegular(kelsy) -> Billowy(kelsy)\nforall x (Unrealised(x) -> Hygienic(x))\n\nnot Hygienic(gwenny)\n\ntherefore Hygienic(gwenny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Pennie is demolished. Pennie is neckless. Pennie is formidable. Pennie is intrusive. Pennie is not diseased. Arlo is demolished. Arlo is diseased. Arlo is cognizable. Arlo is monoatomic. Isobel is intrusive. Isobel is monoatomic. Jocelin is neckless. Jocelin is formidable. Jocelin is intrusive. Jocelin is diseased. If Jocelin is intrusive then Jocelin is formidable. If something is monoatomic then it is formidable. All formidable things are cognizable. If something is monoatomic and formidable then it is neckless. If Isobel is cognizable then Isobel is demolished. If something is monoatomic then it is intrusive. Isobel is formidable.", "logic": "\nDemolished(pennie)\nNeckless(pennie)\nFormidable(pennie)\nIntrusive(pennie)\nnot Diseased(pennie)\nDemolished(arlo)\nDiseased(arlo)\nCognizable(arlo)\nMonoatomic(arlo)\nIntrusive(isobel)\nMonoatomic(isobel)\nNeckless(jocelin)\nFormidable(jocelin)\nIntrusive(jocelin)\nDiseased(jocelin)\nIntrusive(jocelin) -> Formidable(jocelin)\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Cognizable(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) and Formidable(x) -> Neckless(x))\nCognizable(isobel) -> Demolished(isobel)\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Intrusive(x))\n\nFormidable(isobel)\n\nMonoatomic(isobel) and forall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Formidable(x)) -> therefore Formidable(isobel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Elyse is phlegmy. Elyse is volitional. Elyse is unarguable. Elyse is pectoral. Elyse is not relaxing. Frederico is phlegmy. Frederico is relaxing. Frederico is mini. Frederico is nonspatial. Kingsly is pectoral. Kingsly is nonspatial. Guillermo is volitional. Guillermo is unarguable. Guillermo is pectoral. Guillermo is relaxing. If Guillermo is pectoral then Guillermo is unarguable. If something is nonspatial then it is unarguable. All unarguable things are mini. If something is nonspatial and unarguable then it is volitional. If Kingsly is mini then Kingsly is phlegmy. If something is nonspatial then it is pectoral. Frederico is not pectoral.", "logic": "\nPhlegmy(elyse)\nVolitional(elyse)\nUnarguable(elyse)\nPectoral(elyse)\nnot Relaxing(elyse)\nPhlegmy(frederico)\nRelaxing(frederico)\nMini(frederico)\nNonspatial(frederico)\nPectoral(kingsly)\nNonspatial(kingsly)\nVolitional(guillermo)\nUnarguable(guillermo)\nPectoral(guillermo)\nRelaxing(guillermo)\nPectoral(guillermo) -> Unarguable(guillermo)\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Unarguable(x))\nforall x (Unarguable(x) -> Mini(x))\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) and Unarguable(x) -> Volitional(x))\nMini(kingsly) -> Phlegmy(kingsly)\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Pectoral(x))\n\nnot Pectoral(frederico)\n\nNonspatial(frederico) and forall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Pectoral(x)) -> therefore Pectoral(frederico)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Betteann is elliptic. Betteann is miotic. Betteann is tenanted. Betteann is unhinged. Betteann is not awless. Carolann is elliptic. Carolann is awless. Carolann is moldovan. Carolann is camp. Rivy is unhinged. Rivy is camp. Adore is miotic. Adore is tenanted. Adore is unhinged. Adore is awless. If Adore is unhinged then Adore is tenanted. If something is camp then it is tenanted. All tenanted things are moldovan. If something is camp and tenanted then it is miotic. If Rivy is moldovan then Rivy is elliptic. If something is camp then it is unhinged. Rivy is moldovan.", "logic": "\nElliptic(betteann)\nMiotic(betteann)\nTenanted(betteann)\nUnhinged(betteann)\nnot Awless(betteann)\nElliptic(carolann)\nAwless(carolann)\nMoldovan(carolann)\nCamp(carolann)\nUnhinged(rivy)\nCamp(rivy)\nMiotic(adore)\nTenanted(adore)\nUnhinged(adore)\nAwless(adore)\nUnhinged(adore) -> Tenanted(adore)\nforall x (Camp(x) -> Tenanted(x))\nforall x (Tenanted(x) -> Moldovan(x))\nforall x (Camp(x) and Tenanted(x) -> Miotic(x))\nMoldovan(rivy) -> Elliptic(rivy)\nforall x (Camp(x) -> Unhinged(x))\n\nMoldovan(rivy)\n\nCamp(rivy) and forall x (Camp(x) -> Tenanted(x)) -> therefore Tenanted(rivy) Tenanted(rivy) and forall x (Tenanted(x) -> Moldovan(x)) -> therefore Moldovan(rivy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Charita is unsexed. Charita is marooned. Charita is hyaline. Charita is acyclic. Charita is not gustatory. Phylis is unsexed. Phylis is gustatory. Phylis is bated. Phylis is sisyphean. Paule is acyclic. Paule is sisyphean. Garwin is marooned. Garwin is hyaline. Garwin is acyclic. Garwin is gustatory. If Garwin is acyclic then Garwin is hyaline. If something is sisyphean then it is hyaline. All hyaline things are bated. If something is sisyphean and hyaline then it is marooned. If Paule is bated then Paule is unsexed. If something is sisyphean then it is acyclic. Paule is not bated.", "logic": "\nUnsexed(charita)\nMarooned(charita)\nHyaline(charita)\nAcyclic(charita)\nnot Gustatory(charita)\nUnsexed(phylis)\nGustatory(phylis)\nBated(phylis)\nSisyphean(phylis)\nAcyclic(paule)\nSisyphean(paule)\nMarooned(garwin)\nHyaline(garwin)\nAcyclic(garwin)\nGustatory(garwin)\nAcyclic(garwin) -> Hyaline(garwin)\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Hyaline(x))\nforall x (Hyaline(x) -> Bated(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Hyaline(x) -> Marooned(x))\nBated(paule) -> Unsexed(paule)\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Acyclic(x))\n\nnot Bated(paule)\n\nSisyphean(paule) and forall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Hyaline(x)) -> therefore Hyaline(paule) Hyaline(paule) and forall x (Hyaline(x) -> Bated(x)) -> therefore Bated(paule)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Hermy is best. Hermy is gingerly. Hermy is octal. Hermy is forlorn. Hermy is not elfin. Christyna is best. Christyna is elfin. Christyna is cynical. Christyna is insolent. Clary is forlorn. Clary is insolent. Whit is gingerly. Whit is octal. Whit is forlorn. Whit is elfin. If Whit is forlorn then Whit is octal. If something is insolent then it is octal. All octal things are cynical. If something is insolent and octal then it is gingerly. If Clary is cynical then Clary is best. If something is insolent then it is forlorn. Clary is best.", "logic": "\nBest(hermy)\nGingerly(hermy)\nOctal(hermy)\nForlorn(hermy)\nnot Elfin(hermy)\nBest(christyna)\nElfin(christyna)\nCynical(christyna)\nInsolent(christyna)\nForlorn(clary)\nInsolent(clary)\nGingerly(whit)\nOctal(whit)\nForlorn(whit)\nElfin(whit)\nForlorn(whit) -> Octal(whit)\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Octal(x))\nforall x (Octal(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Insolent(x) and Octal(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nCynical(clary) -> Best(clary)\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Forlorn(x))\n\nBest(clary)\n\nInsolent(clary) and forall x (Insolent(x) -> Octal(x)) -> therefore Octal(clary) Octal(clary) and forall x (Octal(x) -> Cynical(x)) -> therefore Cynical(clary) Cynical(clary) and Cynical(clary) -> Best(clary) -> therefore Best(clary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Ichabod is orangish. Ichabod is halcyon. Ichabod is ruled. Ichabod is ceremonial. Ichabod is not parametric. Umberto is orangish. Umberto is parametric. Umberto is sexed. Umberto is screaky. Serene is ceremonial. Serene is screaky. Ivy is halcyon. Ivy is ruled. Ivy is ceremonial. Ivy is parametric. If Ivy is ceremonial then Ivy is ruled. If something is screaky then it is ruled. All ruled things are sexed. If something is screaky and ruled then it is halcyon. If Serene is sexed then Serene is orangish. If something is screaky then it is ceremonial. Serene is not orangish.", "logic": "\nOrangish(ichabod)\nHalcyon(ichabod)\nRuled(ichabod)\nCeremonial(ichabod)\nnot Parametric(ichabod)\nOrangish(umberto)\nParametric(umberto)\nSexed(umberto)\nScreaky(umberto)\nCeremonial(serene)\nScreaky(serene)\nHalcyon(ivy)\nRuled(ivy)\nCeremonial(ivy)\nParametric(ivy)\nCeremonial(ivy) -> Ruled(ivy)\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Ruled(x))\nforall x (Ruled(x) -> Sexed(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) and Ruled(x) -> Halcyon(x))\nSexed(serene) -> Orangish(serene)\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\n\nnot Orangish(serene)\n\nScreaky(serene) and forall x (Screaky(x) -> Ruled(x)) -> therefore Ruled(serene) Ruled(serene) and forall x (Ruled(x) -> Sexed(x)) -> therefore Sexed(serene) Sexed(serene) and Sexed(serene) -> Orangish(serene) -> therefore Orangish(serene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Adele is recluse. Adele is shipboard. Adele is triplex. Adele is colorfast. Adele is not beaming. Frans is recluse. Frans is beaming. Frans is rash. Frans is reedy. Marinna is colorfast. Marinna is reedy. Rachael is shipboard. Rachael is triplex. Rachael is colorfast. Rachael is beaming. If Rachael is colorfast then Rachael is triplex. If something is reedy then it is triplex. All triplex things are rash. If something is reedy and triplex then it is shipboard. If Marinna is rash then Marinna is recluse. If something is reedy then it is colorfast. Rachael is not reedy.", "logic": "\nRecluse(adele)\nShipboard(adele)\nTriplex(adele)\nColorfast(adele)\nnot Beaming(adele)\nRecluse(frans)\nBeaming(frans)\nRash(frans)\nReedy(frans)\nColorfast(marinna)\nReedy(marinna)\nShipboard(rachael)\nTriplex(rachael)\nColorfast(rachael)\nBeaming(rachael)\nColorfast(rachael) -> Triplex(rachael)\nforall x (Reedy(x) -> Triplex(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) -> Rash(x))\nforall x (Reedy(x) and Triplex(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nRash(marinna) -> Recluse(marinna)\nforall x (Reedy(x) -> Colorfast(x))\n\nnot Reedy(rachael)\n\nnot Reedy(rachael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Dickie is subfusc. Dickie is achaean. Dickie is eukaryotic. Dickie is clarion. Dickie is not papistic. Esther is subfusc. Esther is papistic. Esther is hasidic. Esther is fruiting. Maressa is clarion. Maressa is fruiting. Brittan is achaean. Brittan is eukaryotic. Brittan is clarion. Brittan is papistic. If Brittan is clarion then Brittan is eukaryotic. If something is fruiting then it is eukaryotic. All eukaryotic things are hasidic. If something is fruiting and eukaryotic then it is achaean. If Maressa is hasidic then Maressa is subfusc. If something is fruiting then it is clarion. Maressa is papistic.", "logic": "\nSubfusc(dickie)\nAchaean(dickie)\nEukaryotic(dickie)\nClarion(dickie)\nnot Papistic(dickie)\nSubfusc(esther)\nPapistic(esther)\nHasidic(esther)\nFruiting(esther)\nClarion(maressa)\nFruiting(maressa)\nAchaean(brittan)\nEukaryotic(brittan)\nClarion(brittan)\nPapistic(brittan)\nClarion(brittan) -> Eukaryotic(brittan)\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> Eukaryotic(x))\nforall x (Eukaryotic(x) -> Hasidic(x))\nforall x (Fruiting(x) and Eukaryotic(x) -> Achaean(x))\nHasidic(maressa) -> Subfusc(maressa)\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> Clarion(x))\n\nPapistic(maressa)\n\nPapistic(maressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Paolina is stretchy. Paolina is malposed. Paolina is runty. Paolina is placative. Paolina is not nicaean. Garnet is stretchy. Garnet is nicaean. Garnet is enfeebling. Garnet is fineable. Adriane is placative. Adriane is fineable. Mickie is malposed. Mickie is runty. Mickie is placative. Mickie is nicaean. If Mickie is placative then Mickie is runty. If something is fineable then it is runty. All runty things are enfeebling. If something is fineable and runty then it is malposed. If Adriane is enfeebling then Adriane is stretchy. If something is fineable then it is placative. Mickie is not stretchy.", "logic": "\nStretchy(paolina)\nMalposed(paolina)\nRunty(paolina)\nPlacative(paolina)\nnot Nicaean(paolina)\nStretchy(garnet)\nNicaean(garnet)\nEnfeebling(garnet)\nFineable(garnet)\nPlacative(adriane)\nFineable(adriane)\nMalposed(mickie)\nRunty(mickie)\nPlacative(mickie)\nNicaean(mickie)\nPlacative(mickie) -> Runty(mickie)\nforall x (Fineable(x) -> Runty(x))\nforall x (Runty(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Fineable(x) and Runty(x) -> Malposed(x))\nEnfeebling(adriane) -> Stretchy(adriane)\nforall x (Fineable(x) -> Placative(x))\n\nnot Stretchy(mickie)\n\nnot Stretchy(mickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Dix is dull. Dix is damask. Dix is beamish. Dix is palpitant. Dix is not umbrageous. Cathyleen is dull. Cathyleen is umbrageous. Cathyleen is harassed. Cathyleen is chimeric. Haskel is palpitant. Haskel is chimeric. Maudie is damask. Maudie is beamish. Maudie is palpitant. Maudie is umbrageous. If Maudie is palpitant then Maudie is beamish. If something is chimeric then it is beamish. All beamish things are harassed. If something is chimeric and beamish then it is damask. If Haskel is harassed then Haskel is dull. If something is chimeric then it is palpitant. Dix is chimeric.", "logic": "\nDull(dix)\nDamask(dix)\nBeamish(dix)\nPalpitant(dix)\nnot Umbrageous(dix)\nDull(cathyleen)\nUmbrageous(cathyleen)\nHarassed(cathyleen)\nChimeric(cathyleen)\nPalpitant(haskel)\nChimeric(haskel)\nDamask(maudie)\nBeamish(maudie)\nPalpitant(maudie)\nUmbrageous(maudie)\nPalpitant(maudie) -> Beamish(maudie)\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Beamish(x))\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> Harassed(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) and Beamish(x) -> Damask(x))\nHarassed(haskel) -> Dull(haskel)\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Palpitant(x))\n\nChimeric(dix)\n\nChimeric(dix) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Othilia is bedrid. Cynthie is not soft. Shannan is not helminthic. Big, helminthic things are bedrid. If something is soft and bedrid then it is scaleless. Rough, helminthic things are waste. All stenotic, positivist things are not waste. Blue things are soft. All bedrid, scaleless things are stenotic. Shannan is not helminthic.", "logic": "\nBedrid(othilia)\nnot Soft(cynthie)\nnot Helminthic(shannan)\nforall x (Positivist(x) and Helminthic(x) -> Bedrid(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) and Bedrid(x) -> Scaleless(x))\nforall x (Scaleless(x) and Helminthic(x) -> Waste(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and Positivist(x) -> not Waste(x))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and Scaleless(x) -> Stenotic(x))\n\nnot Helminthic(shannan)\n\ntherefore not Helminthic(shannan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Dane is unsightly. Adriane is not leisurely. Denys is not ligneous. Big, ligneous things are unsightly. If something is leisurely and unsightly then it is aboral. Rough, ligneous things are taxable. All unmourned, ulcerative things are not taxable. Blue things are leisurely. All unsightly, aboral things are unmourned. Denys is ligneous.", "logic": "\nUnsightly(dane)\nnot Leisurely(adriane)\nnot Ligneous(denys)\nforall x (Ulcerative(x) and Ligneous(x) -> Unsightly(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) and Unsightly(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Aboral(x) and Ligneous(x) -> Taxable(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) and Ulcerative(x) -> not Taxable(x))\nforall x (Unsightly(x) -> Leisurely(x))\nforall x (Unsightly(x) and Aboral(x) -> Unmourned(x))\n\nLigneous(denys)\n\ntherefore not Ligneous(denys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Ginny is erudite. Sandor is not algoid. Jay is not xxxi. Big, xxxi things are erudite. If something is algoid and erudite then it is voidable. Rough, xxxi things are upright. All linear, limited things are not upright. Blue things are algoid. All erudite, voidable things are linear. Ginny is algoid.", "logic": "\nErudite(ginny)\nnot Algoid(sandor)\nnot Xxxi(jay)\nforall x (Limited(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Algoid(x) and Erudite(x) -> Voidable(x))\nforall x (Voidable(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Linear(x) and Limited(x) -> not Upright(x))\nforall x (Erudite(x) -> Algoid(x))\nforall x (Erudite(x) and Voidable(x) -> Linear(x))\n\nAlgoid(ginny)\n\nErudite(ginny) and forall x (Erudite(x) -> Algoid(x)) -> therefore Algoid(ginny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Bettine is moderne. Voltaire is not unshoed. Jerrylee is not both. Big, both things are moderne. If something is unshoed and moderne then it is slick. Rough, both things are ebionite. All septal, structural things are not ebionite. Blue things are unshoed. All moderne, slick things are septal. Bettine is not unshoed.", "logic": "\nModerne(bettine)\nnot Unshoed(voltaire)\nnot Both(jerrylee)\nforall x (Structural(x) and Both(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) and Moderne(x) -> Slick(x))\nforall x (Slick(x) and Both(x) -> Ebionite(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) and Structural(x) -> not Ebionite(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Unshoed(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) and Slick(x) -> Septal(x))\n\nnot Unshoed(bettine)\n\nModerne(bettine) and forall x (Moderne(x) -> Unshoed(x)) -> therefore Unshoed(bettine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Tiphani is iritic. Mendie is not untracked. Daniele is not thenar. Big, thenar things are iritic. If something is untracked and iritic then it is unlocated. Rough, thenar things are thinkable. All dismayed, documented things are not thinkable. Blue things are untracked. All iritic, unlocated things are dismayed. Tiphani is unlocated.", "logic": "\nIritic(tiphani)\nnot Untracked(mendie)\nnot Thenar(daniele)\nforall x (Documented(x) and Thenar(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Untracked(x) and Iritic(x) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Unlocated(x) and Thenar(x) -> Thinkable(x))\nforall x (Dismayed(x) and Documented(x) -> not Thinkable(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Untracked(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) and Unlocated(x) -> Dismayed(x))\n\nUnlocated(tiphani)\n\nIritic(tiphani) and forall x (Iritic(x) -> Untracked(x)) -> therefore Untracked(tiphani) Untracked(tiphani) and Iritic(tiphani) and forall x (Untracked(x) and Iritic(x) -> Unlocated(x)) -> therefore Unlocated(tiphani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Roselin is sextuple. Rosanna is not offhanded. Ely is not radio. Big, radio things are sextuple. If something is offhanded and sextuple then it is exhausted. Rough, radio things are eligible. All unliveried, sumatran things are not eligible. Blue things are offhanded. All sextuple, exhausted things are unliveried. Roselin is not exhausted.", "logic": "\nSextuple(roselin)\nnot Offhanded(rosanna)\nnot Radio(ely)\nforall x (Sumatran(x) and Radio(x) -> Sextuple(x))\nforall x (Offhanded(x) and Sextuple(x) -> Exhausted(x))\nforall x (Exhausted(x) and Radio(x) -> Eligible(x))\nforall x (Unliveried(x) and Sumatran(x) -> not Eligible(x))\nforall x (Sextuple(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Sextuple(x) and Exhausted(x) -> Unliveried(x))\n\nnot Exhausted(roselin)\n\nSextuple(roselin) and forall x (Sextuple(x) -> Offhanded(x)) -> therefore Offhanded(roselin) Offhanded(roselin) and Sextuple(roselin) and forall x (Offhanded(x) and Sextuple(x) -> Exhausted(x)) -> therefore Exhausted(roselin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Mollie is gelid. Martino is not unmovable. Thia is not abstemious. Big, abstemious things are gelid. If something is unmovable and gelid then it is faltering. Rough, abstemious things are osmotic. All growing, calculous things are not osmotic. Blue things are unmovable. All gelid, faltering things are growing. Mollie is growing.", "logic": "\nGelid(mollie)\nnot Unmovable(martino)\nnot Abstemious(thia)\nforall x (Calculous(x) and Abstemious(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Unmovable(x) and Gelid(x) -> Faltering(x))\nforall x (Faltering(x) and Abstemious(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Growing(x) and Calculous(x) -> not Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Gelid(x) -> Unmovable(x))\nforall x (Gelid(x) and Faltering(x) -> Growing(x))\n\nGrowing(mollie)\n\nGelid(mollie) and forall x (Gelid(x) -> Unmovable(x)) -> therefore Unmovable(mollie) Unmovable(mollie) and Gelid(mollie) and forall x (Unmovable(x) and Gelid(x) -> Faltering(x)) -> therefore Faltering(mollie) Gelid(mollie) and Faltering(mollie) and forall x (Gelid(x) and Faltering(x) -> Growing(x)) -> therefore Growing(mollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Kial is mandatory. Terrel is not apostate. Frederico is not etiologic. Big, etiologic things are mandatory. If something is apostate and mandatory then it is hopeful. Rough, etiologic things are merging. All jocund, downstairs things are not merging. Blue things are apostate. All mandatory, hopeful things are jocund. Kial is not jocund.", "logic": "\nMandatory(kial)\nnot Apostate(terrel)\nnot Etiologic(frederico)\nforall x (Downstairs(x) and Etiologic(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nforall x (Apostate(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Hopeful(x))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) and Etiologic(x) -> Merging(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) and Downstairs(x) -> not Merging(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) -> Apostate(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) and Hopeful(x) -> Jocund(x))\n\nnot Jocund(kial)\n\nMandatory(kial) and forall x (Mandatory(x) -> Apostate(x)) -> therefore Apostate(kial) Apostate(kial) and Mandatory(kial) and forall x (Apostate(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Hopeful(x)) -> therefore Hopeful(kial) Mandatory(kial) and Hopeful(kial) and forall x (Mandatory(x) and Hopeful(x) -> Jocund(x)) -> therefore Jocund(kial)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Iris is hilarious. Dov is not outraged. Kora is not wanton. Big, wanton things are hilarious. If something is outraged and hilarious then it is groping. Rough, wanton things are aurorean. All unenforced, miraculous things are not aurorean. Blue things are outraged. All hilarious, groping things are unenforced. Kora is not hilarious.", "logic": "\nHilarious(iris)\nnot Outraged(dov)\nnot Wanton(kora)\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and Wanton(x) -> Hilarious(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) and Hilarious(x) -> Groping(x))\nforall x (Groping(x) and Wanton(x) -> Aurorean(x))\nforall x (Unenforced(x) and Miraculous(x) -> not Aurorean(x))\nforall x (Hilarious(x) -> Outraged(x))\nforall x (Hilarious(x) and Groping(x) -> Unenforced(x))\n\nnot Hilarious(kora)\n\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and Wanton(x) -> Hilarious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Quinlan is bubonic. Simonette is not pocked. Deena is not stuffy. Big, stuffy things are bubonic. If something is pocked and bubonic then it is desirable. Rough, stuffy things are undersea. All caudated, analytical things are not undersea. Blue things are pocked. All bubonic, desirable things are caudated. Simonette is desirable.", "logic": "\nBubonic(quinlan)\nnot Pocked(simonette)\nnot Stuffy(deena)\nforall x (Analytical(x) and Stuffy(x) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Pocked(x) and Bubonic(x) -> Desirable(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and Stuffy(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Caudated(x) and Analytical(x) -> not Undersea(x))\nforall x (Bubonic(x) -> Pocked(x))\nforall x (Bubonic(x) and Desirable(x) -> Caudated(x))\n\nDesirable(simonette)\n\nforall x (Pocked(x) and Bubonic(x) -> Desirable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Hetti is unsteady. Ardenia is not huddled. Arlie is not humourless. Big, humourless things are unsteady. If something is huddled and unsteady then it is batrachian. Rough, humourless things are grizzly. All togolese, lxxxii things are not grizzly. Blue things are huddled. All unsteady, batrachian things are togolese. Hetti is not grizzly.", "logic": "\nUnsteady(hetti)\nnot Huddled(ardenia)\nnot Humourless(arlie)\nforall x (Lxxxii(x) and Humourless(x) -> Unsteady(x))\nforall x (Huddled(x) and Unsteady(x) -> Batrachian(x))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) and Humourless(x) -> Grizzly(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) and Lxxxii(x) -> not Grizzly(x))\nforall x (Unsteady(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Unsteady(x) and Batrachian(x) -> Togolese(x))\n\nnot Grizzly(hetti)\n\nforall x (Batrachian(x) and Humourless(x) -> Grizzly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Randy is earlyish. Miguel is not atheist. Mort is not premedical. Big, premedical things are earlyish. If something is atheist and earlyish then it is frizzly. Rough, premedical things are domed. All necklike, bodily things are not domed. Blue things are atheist. All earlyish, frizzly things are necklike. Mort is domed.", "logic": "\nEarlyish(randy)\nnot Atheist(miguel)\nnot Premedical(mort)\nforall x (Bodily(x) and Premedical(x) -> Earlyish(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) and Earlyish(x) -> Frizzly(x))\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and Premedical(x) -> Domed(x))\nforall x (Necklike(x) and Bodily(x) -> not Domed(x))\nforall x (Earlyish(x) -> Atheist(x))\nforall x (Earlyish(x) and Frizzly(x) -> Necklike(x))\n\nDomed(mort)\n\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and Premedical(x) -> Domed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "John is early. Modesty is not renegade. Clarke is not unshakable. Big, unshakable things are early. If something is renegade and early then it is dazzling. Rough, unshakable things are panoptical. All slothful, glorious things are not panoptical. Blue things are renegade. All early, dazzling things are slothful. John is not unshakable.", "logic": "\nEarly(john)\nnot Renegade(modesty)\nnot Unshakable(clarke)\nforall x (Glorious(x) and Unshakable(x) -> Early(x))\nforall x (Renegade(x) and Early(x) -> Dazzling(x))\nforall x (Dazzling(x) and Unshakable(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Slothful(x) and Glorious(x) -> not Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Early(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Early(x) and Dazzling(x) -> Slothful(x))\n\nnot Unshakable(john)\n\nnot Unshakable(john) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Amabel is daedal. Len is not enduring. Lavena is not foiled. Big, foiled things are daedal. If something is enduring and daedal then it is occlusive. Rough, foiled things are exodontic. All leptorhine, untucked things are not exodontic. Blue things are enduring. All daedal, occlusive things are leptorhine. Len is foiled.", "logic": "\nDaedal(amabel)\nnot Enduring(len)\nnot Foiled(lavena)\nforall x (Untucked(x) and Foiled(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Daedal(x) -> Occlusive(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Foiled(x) -> Exodontic(x))\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) and Untucked(x) -> not Exodontic(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Enduring(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) and Occlusive(x) -> Leptorhine(x))\n\nFoiled(len)\n\nFoiled(len) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Dynah is masterful. Templeton is not affixed. Dela is not bimonthly. Big, bimonthly things are masterful. If something is affixed and masterful then it is interwoven. Rough, bimonthly things are magnetised. All cantabile, iridescent things are not magnetised. Blue things are affixed. All masterful, interwoven things are cantabile. Dynah is not iridescent.", "logic": "\nMasterful(dynah)\nnot Affixed(templeton)\nnot Bimonthly(dela)\nforall x (Iridescent(x) and Bimonthly(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Affixed(x) and Masterful(x) -> Interwoven(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Bimonthly(x) -> Magnetised(x))\nforall x (Cantabile(x) and Iridescent(x) -> not Magnetised(x))\nforall x (Masterful(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Masterful(x) and Interwoven(x) -> Cantabile(x))\n\nnot Iridescent(dynah)\n\nnot Iridescent(dynah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Ainslie is pernicious. Artur is not inimical. Kara is not pleasant. Big, pleasant things are pernicious. If something is inimical and pernicious then it is hedged. Rough, pleasant things are startling. All libertine, wrecked things are not startling. Blue things are inimical. All pernicious, hedged things are libertine. Kara is wrecked.", "logic": "\nPernicious(ainslie)\nnot Inimical(artur)\nnot Pleasant(kara)\nforall x (Wrecked(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Pernicious(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Pernicious(x) -> Hedged(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Startling(x))\nforall x (Libertine(x) and Wrecked(x) -> not Startling(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) -> Inimical(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Hedged(x) -> Libertine(x))\n\nWrecked(kara)\n\nWrecked(kara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "The darcee cohere the blondy. The darcee is not personable. The darcee is preset. The darcee unscrew the blondy. The darcee does not like the blanch. The darcee reinstate the blondy. The darcee reinstate the blanch. The blondy cohere the blanch. The blondy is personable. The blanch does not like the darcee. If the blondy is hinder and the blondy cohere the blanch then the blondy reinstate the darcee. If the darcee reinstate the blanch and the darcee cohere the blanch then the blanch is hinder. If the darcee is unneurotic and the darcee reinstate the blanch then the blanch cohere the darcee. If something unscrew the darcee and it does not like the blanch then the blanch unscrew the blondy. If something is hinder then it does not like the blondy. If something cohere the blondy then it cohere the blanch. Big things are not preset. If something cohere the blondy and it is not unwarmed then it reinstate the blondy. The darcee does not like the blanch.", "logic": "\nCohere(darcee, blondy)\nnot Personable(darcee)\nPreset(darcee)\nUnscrew(darcee, blondy)\nnot Unscrew(darcee, blanch)\nReinstate(darcee, blondy)\nReinstate(darcee, blanch)\nCohere(blondy, blanch)\nPersonable(blondy)\nnot Unscrew(blanch, darcee)\nHinder(blondy) and Cohere(blondy, blanch) -> Reinstate(blondy, darcee)\nReinstate(darcee, blanch) and Cohere(darcee, blanch) -> Hinder(blanch)\nUnneurotic(darcee) and Reinstate(darcee, blanch) -> Cohere(blanch, darcee)\nforall x (Unscrew(x, darcee) and not Unscrew(x, blanch) -> Unscrew(blanch, blondy))\nforall x (Hinder(x) -> not Unscrew(x, blondy))\nforall x (Cohere(x, blondy) -> Cohere(x, blanch))\nforall x (Unneurotic(x) -> not Preset(x))\nforall x (Cohere(x, blondy) and not Unwarmed(x) -> Reinstate(x, blondy))\n\nnot Unscrew(darcee, blanch)\n\ntherefore not Unscrew(darcee, blanch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The harrold overtop the hildy. The harrold is not trifoliate. The harrold is trilled. The harrold dulcify the hildy. The harrold does not like the eugene. The harrold clack the hildy. The harrold clack the eugene. The hildy overtop the eugene. The hildy is trifoliate. The eugene does not like the harrold. If the hildy is untucked and the hildy overtop the eugene then the hildy clack the harrold. If the harrold clack the eugene and the harrold overtop the eugene then the eugene is untucked. If the harrold is hotheaded and the harrold clack the eugene then the eugene overtop the harrold. If something dulcify the harrold and it does not like the eugene then the eugene dulcify the hildy. If something is untucked then it does not like the hildy. If something overtop the hildy then it overtop the eugene. Big things are not trilled. If something overtop the hildy and it is not ephesian then it clack the hildy. The hildy is not trifoliate.", "logic": "\nOvertop(harrold, hildy)\nnot Trifoliate(harrold)\nTrilled(harrold)\nDulcify(harrold, hildy)\nnot Dulcify(harrold, eugene)\nClack(harrold, hildy)\nClack(harrold, eugene)\nOvertop(hildy, eugene)\nTrifoliate(hildy)\nnot Dulcify(eugene, harrold)\nUntucked(hildy) and Overtop(hildy, eugene) -> Clack(hildy, harrold)\nClack(harrold, eugene) and Overtop(harrold, eugene) -> Untucked(eugene)\nHotheaded(harrold) and Clack(harrold, eugene) -> Overtop(eugene, harrold)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, harrold) and not Dulcify(x, eugene) -> Dulcify(eugene, hildy))\nforall x (Untucked(x) -> not Dulcify(x, hildy))\nforall x (Overtop(x, hildy) -> Overtop(x, eugene))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> not Trilled(x))\nforall x (Overtop(x, hildy) and not Ephesian(x) -> Clack(x, hildy))\n\nnot Trifoliate(hildy)\n\ntherefore Trifoliate(hildy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The dory puncture the jannel. The dory is not thyroid. The dory is eparchial. The dory deplane the jannel. The dory does not like the micheil. The dory sample the jannel. The dory sample the micheil. The jannel puncture the micheil. The jannel is thyroid. The micheil does not like the dory. If the jannel is roasted and the jannel puncture the micheil then the jannel sample the dory. If the dory sample the micheil and the dory puncture the micheil then the micheil is roasted. If the dory is tartaric and the dory sample the micheil then the micheil puncture the dory. If something deplane the dory and it does not like the micheil then the micheil deplane the jannel. If something is roasted then it does not like the jannel. If something puncture the jannel then it puncture the micheil. Big things are not eparchial. If something puncture the jannel and it is not eminent then it sample the jannel. The dory puncture the micheil.", "logic": "\nPuncture(dory, jannel)\nnot Thyroid(dory)\nEparchial(dory)\nDeplane(dory, jannel)\nnot Deplane(dory, micheil)\nSample(dory, jannel)\nSample(dory, micheil)\nPuncture(jannel, micheil)\nThyroid(jannel)\nnot Deplane(micheil, dory)\nRoasted(jannel) and Puncture(jannel, micheil) -> Sample(jannel, dory)\nSample(dory, micheil) and Puncture(dory, micheil) -> Roasted(micheil)\nTartaric(dory) and Sample(dory, micheil) -> Puncture(micheil, dory)\nforall x (Deplane(x, dory) and not Deplane(x, micheil) -> Deplane(micheil, jannel))\nforall x (Roasted(x) -> not Deplane(x, jannel))\nforall x (Puncture(x, jannel) -> Puncture(x, micheil))\nforall x (Tartaric(x) -> not Eparchial(x))\nforall x (Puncture(x, jannel) and not Eminent(x) -> Sample(x, jannel))\n\nPuncture(dory, micheil)\n\nPuncture(dory, jannel) and forall x (Puncture(x, jannel) -> Puncture(x, micheil)) -> therefore Puncture(dory, micheil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The dodi ghostwrite the rogers. The dodi is not hugoesque. The dodi is lunisolar. The dodi kibbitz the rogers. The dodi does not like the albert. The dodi acidify the rogers. The dodi acidify the albert. The rogers ghostwrite the albert. The rogers is hugoesque. The albert does not like the dodi. If the rogers is bruising and the rogers ghostwrite the albert then the rogers acidify the dodi. If the dodi acidify the albert and the dodi ghostwrite the albert then the albert is bruising. If the dodi is sacrosanct and the dodi acidify the albert then the albert ghostwrite the dodi. If something kibbitz the dodi and it does not like the albert then the albert kibbitz the rogers. If something is bruising then it does not like the rogers. If something ghostwrite the rogers then it ghostwrite the albert. Big things are not lunisolar. If something ghostwrite the rogers and it is not skinnerian then it acidify the rogers. The dodi does not chase the albert.", "logic": "\nGhostwrite(dodi, rogers)\nnot Hugoesque(dodi)\nLunisolar(dodi)\nKibbitz(dodi, rogers)\nnot Kibbitz(dodi, albert)\nAcidify(dodi, rogers)\nAcidify(dodi, albert)\nGhostwrite(rogers, albert)\nHugoesque(rogers)\nnot Kibbitz(albert, dodi)\nBruising(rogers) and Ghostwrite(rogers, albert) -> Acidify(rogers, dodi)\nAcidify(dodi, albert) and Ghostwrite(dodi, albert) -> Bruising(albert)\nSacrosanct(dodi) and Acidify(dodi, albert) -> Ghostwrite(albert, dodi)\nforall x (Kibbitz(x, dodi) and not Kibbitz(x, albert) -> Kibbitz(albert, rogers))\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> not Kibbitz(x, rogers))\nforall x (Ghostwrite(x, rogers) -> Ghostwrite(x, albert))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> not Lunisolar(x))\nforall x (Ghostwrite(x, rogers) and not Skinnerian(x) -> Acidify(x, rogers))\n\nnot Ghostwrite(dodi, albert)\n\nGhostwrite(dodi, rogers) and forall x (Ghostwrite(x, rogers) -> Ghostwrite(x, albert)) -> therefore Ghostwrite(dodi, albert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The hew lour the elianora. The hew is not adynamic. The hew is tetanic. The hew brawl the elianora. The hew does not like the kraig. The hew outgrow the elianora. The hew outgrow the kraig. The elianora lour the kraig. The elianora is adynamic. The kraig does not like the hew. If the elianora is pseudo and the elianora lour the kraig then the elianora outgrow the hew. If the hew outgrow the kraig and the hew lour the kraig then the kraig is pseudo. If the hew is sequent and the hew outgrow the kraig then the kraig lour the hew. If something brawl the hew and it does not like the kraig then the kraig brawl the elianora. If something is pseudo then it does not like the elianora. If something lour the elianora then it lour the kraig. Big things are not tetanic. If something lour the elianora and it is not neural then it outgrow the elianora. The kraig is pseudo.", "logic": "\nLour(hew, elianora)\nnot Adynamic(hew)\nTetanic(hew)\nBrawl(hew, elianora)\nnot Brawl(hew, kraig)\nOutgrow(hew, elianora)\nOutgrow(hew, kraig)\nLour(elianora, kraig)\nAdynamic(elianora)\nnot Brawl(kraig, hew)\nPseudo(elianora) and Lour(elianora, kraig) -> Outgrow(elianora, hew)\nOutgrow(hew, kraig) and Lour(hew, kraig) -> Pseudo(kraig)\nSequent(hew) and Outgrow(hew, kraig) -> Lour(kraig, hew)\nforall x (Brawl(x, hew) and not Brawl(x, kraig) -> Brawl(kraig, elianora))\nforall x (Pseudo(x) -> not Brawl(x, elianora))\nforall x (Lour(x, elianora) -> Lour(x, kraig))\nforall x (Sequent(x) -> not Tetanic(x))\nforall x (Lour(x, elianora) and not Neural(x) -> Outgrow(x, elianora))\n\nPseudo(kraig)\n\nLour(hew, elianora) and forall x (Lour(x, elianora) -> Lour(x, kraig)) -> therefore Lour(hew, kraig) Outgrow(hew, kraig) and Lour(hew, kraig) and Outgrow(hew, kraig) and Lour(hew, kraig) -> Pseudo(kraig) -> therefore Pseudo(kraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The waverley radicalize the sergeant. The waverley is not salubrious. The waverley is tetanic. The waverley dulcify the sergeant. The waverley does not like the eddie. The waverley grin the sergeant. The waverley grin the eddie. The sergeant radicalize the eddie. The sergeant is salubrious. The eddie does not like the waverley. If the sergeant is unarmored and the sergeant radicalize the eddie then the sergeant grin the waverley. If the waverley grin the eddie and the waverley radicalize the eddie then the eddie is unarmored. If the waverley is unabridged and the waverley grin the eddie then the eddie radicalize the waverley. If something dulcify the waverley and it does not like the eddie then the eddie dulcify the sergeant. If something is unarmored then it does not like the sergeant. If something radicalize the sergeant then it radicalize the eddie. Big things are not tetanic. If something radicalize the sergeant and it is not conjugated then it grin the sergeant. The eddie is not unarmored.", "logic": "\nRadicalize(waverley, sergeant)\nnot Salubrious(waverley)\nTetanic(waverley)\nDulcify(waverley, sergeant)\nnot Dulcify(waverley, eddie)\nGrin(waverley, sergeant)\nGrin(waverley, eddie)\nRadicalize(sergeant, eddie)\nSalubrious(sergeant)\nnot Dulcify(eddie, waverley)\nUnarmored(sergeant) and Radicalize(sergeant, eddie) -> Grin(sergeant, waverley)\nGrin(waverley, eddie) and Radicalize(waverley, eddie) -> Unarmored(eddie)\nUnabridged(waverley) and Grin(waverley, eddie) -> Radicalize(eddie, waverley)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, waverley) and not Dulcify(x, eddie) -> Dulcify(eddie, sergeant))\nforall x (Unarmored(x) -> not Dulcify(x, sergeant))\nforall x (Radicalize(x, sergeant) -> Radicalize(x, eddie))\nforall x (Unabridged(x) -> not Tetanic(x))\nforall x (Radicalize(x, sergeant) and not Conjugated(x) -> Grin(x, sergeant))\n\nnot Unarmored(eddie)\n\nRadicalize(waverley, sergeant) and forall x (Radicalize(x, sergeant) -> Radicalize(x, eddie)) -> therefore Radicalize(waverley, eddie) Grin(waverley, eddie) and Radicalize(waverley, eddie) and Grin(waverley, eddie) and Radicalize(waverley, eddie) -> Unarmored(eddie) -> therefore Unarmored(eddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The hymie abrogate the katharine. The hymie is not pectoral. The hymie is iodised. The hymie budge the katharine. The hymie does not like the igor. The hymie bond the katharine. The hymie bond the igor. The katharine abrogate the igor. The katharine is pectoral. The igor does not like the hymie. If the katharine is carmelite and the katharine abrogate the igor then the katharine bond the hymie. If the hymie bond the igor and the hymie abrogate the igor then the igor is carmelite. If the hymie is truculent and the hymie bond the igor then the igor abrogate the hymie. If something budge the hymie and it does not like the igor then the igor budge the katharine. If something is carmelite then it does not like the katharine. If something abrogate the katharine then it abrogate the igor. Big things are not iodised. If something abrogate the katharine and it is not awheel then it bond the katharine. The igor does not like the katharine.", "logic": "\nAbrogate(hymie, katharine)\nnot Pectoral(hymie)\nIodised(hymie)\nBudge(hymie, katharine)\nnot Budge(hymie, igor)\nBond(hymie, katharine)\nBond(hymie, igor)\nAbrogate(katharine, igor)\nPectoral(katharine)\nnot Budge(igor, hymie)\nCarmelite(katharine) and Abrogate(katharine, igor) -> Bond(katharine, hymie)\nBond(hymie, igor) and Abrogate(hymie, igor) -> Carmelite(igor)\nTruculent(hymie) and Bond(hymie, igor) -> Abrogate(igor, hymie)\nforall x (Budge(x, hymie) and not Budge(x, igor) -> Budge(igor, katharine))\nforall x (Carmelite(x) -> not Budge(x, katharine))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, katharine) -> Abrogate(x, igor))\nforall x (Truculent(x) -> not Iodised(x))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, katharine) and not Awheel(x) -> Bond(x, katharine))\n\nnot Budge(igor, katharine)\n\nAbrogate(hymie, katharine) and forall x (Abrogate(x, katharine) -> Abrogate(x, igor)) -> therefore Abrogate(hymie, igor) Bond(hymie, igor) and Abrogate(hymie, igor) and Bond(hymie, igor) and Abrogate(hymie, igor) -> Carmelite(igor) -> therefore Carmelite(igor) Carmelite(igor) and forall x (Carmelite(x) -> not Budge(x, katharine)) -> therefore not Budge(igor, katharine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The carmel nose the bernardo. The carmel is not swayback. The carmel is drowsy. The carmel reprobate the bernardo. The carmel does not like the aleece. The carmel sulphur the bernardo. The carmel sulphur the aleece. The bernardo nose the aleece. The bernardo is swayback. The aleece does not like the carmel. If the bernardo is floaty and the bernardo nose the aleece then the bernardo sulphur the carmel. If the carmel sulphur the aleece and the carmel nose the aleece then the aleece is floaty. If the carmel is uneducated and the carmel sulphur the aleece then the aleece nose the carmel. If something reprobate the carmel and it does not like the aleece then the aleece reprobate the bernardo. If something is floaty then it does not like the bernardo. If something nose the bernardo then it nose the aleece. Big things are not drowsy. If something nose the bernardo and it is not sought then it sulphur the bernardo. The aleece reprobate the bernardo.", "logic": "\nNose(carmel, bernardo)\nnot Swayback(carmel)\nDrowsy(carmel)\nReprobate(carmel, bernardo)\nnot Reprobate(carmel, aleece)\nSulphur(carmel, bernardo)\nSulphur(carmel, aleece)\nNose(bernardo, aleece)\nSwayback(bernardo)\nnot Reprobate(aleece, carmel)\nFloaty(bernardo) and Nose(bernardo, aleece) -> Sulphur(bernardo, carmel)\nSulphur(carmel, aleece) and Nose(carmel, aleece) -> Floaty(aleece)\nUneducated(carmel) and Sulphur(carmel, aleece) -> Nose(aleece, carmel)\nforall x (Reprobate(x, carmel) and not Reprobate(x, aleece) -> Reprobate(aleece, bernardo))\nforall x (Floaty(x) -> not Reprobate(x, bernardo))\nforall x (Nose(x, bernardo) -> Nose(x, aleece))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> not Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Nose(x, bernardo) and not Sought(x) -> Sulphur(x, bernardo))\n\nReprobate(aleece, bernardo)\n\nNose(carmel, bernardo) and forall x (Nose(x, bernardo) -> Nose(x, aleece)) -> therefore Nose(carmel, aleece) Sulphur(carmel, aleece) and Nose(carmel, aleece) and Sulphur(carmel, aleece) and Nose(carmel, aleece) -> Floaty(aleece) -> therefore Floaty(aleece) Floaty(aleece) and forall x (Floaty(x) -> not Reprobate(x, bernardo)) -> therefore not Reprobate(aleece, bernardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The rasla jack the wyatan. The rasla is not burly. The rasla is pedal. The rasla clasp the wyatan. The rasla does not like the vivie. The rasla localise the wyatan. The rasla localise the vivie. The wyatan jack the vivie. The wyatan is burly. The vivie does not like the rasla. If the wyatan is rarefied and the wyatan jack the vivie then the wyatan localise the rasla. If the rasla localise the vivie and the rasla jack the vivie then the vivie is rarefied. If the rasla is salving and the rasla localise the vivie then the vivie jack the rasla. If something clasp the rasla and it does not like the vivie then the vivie clasp the wyatan. If something is rarefied then it does not like the wyatan. If something jack the wyatan then it jack the vivie. Big things are not pedal. If something jack the wyatan and it is not magnified then it localise the wyatan. The vivie does not see the wyatan.", "logic": "\nJack(rasla, wyatan)\nnot Burly(rasla)\nPedal(rasla)\nClasp(rasla, wyatan)\nnot Clasp(rasla, vivie)\nLocalise(rasla, wyatan)\nLocalise(rasla, vivie)\nJack(wyatan, vivie)\nBurly(wyatan)\nnot Clasp(vivie, rasla)\nRarefied(wyatan) and Jack(wyatan, vivie) -> Localise(wyatan, rasla)\nLocalise(rasla, vivie) and Jack(rasla, vivie) -> Rarefied(vivie)\nSalving(rasla) and Localise(rasla, vivie) -> Jack(vivie, rasla)\nforall x (Clasp(x, rasla) and not Clasp(x, vivie) -> Clasp(vivie, wyatan))\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> not Clasp(x, wyatan))\nforall x (Jack(x, wyatan) -> Jack(x, vivie))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> not Pedal(x))\nforall x (Jack(x, wyatan) and not Magnified(x) -> Localise(x, wyatan))\n\nnot Localise(vivie, wyatan)\n\nforall x (Jack(x, wyatan) and not Magnified(x) -> Localise(x, wyatan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The jasper brew the colleen. The jasper is not uncurbed. The jasper is veiled. The jasper hurt the colleen. The jasper does not like the louisette. The jasper syphon the colleen. The jasper syphon the louisette. The colleen brew the louisette. The colleen is uncurbed. The louisette does not like the jasper. If the colleen is unearthly and the colleen brew the louisette then the colleen syphon the jasper. If the jasper syphon the louisette and the jasper brew the louisette then the louisette is unearthly. If the jasper is furious and the jasper syphon the louisette then the louisette brew the jasper. If something hurt the jasper and it does not like the louisette then the louisette hurt the colleen. If something is unearthly then it does not like the colleen. If something brew the colleen then it brew the louisette. Big things are not veiled. If something brew the colleen and it is not branched then it syphon the colleen. The colleen syphon the colleen.", "logic": "\nBrew(jasper, colleen)\nnot Uncurbed(jasper)\nVeiled(jasper)\nHurt(jasper, colleen)\nnot Hurt(jasper, louisette)\nSyphon(jasper, colleen)\nSyphon(jasper, louisette)\nBrew(colleen, louisette)\nUncurbed(colleen)\nnot Hurt(louisette, jasper)\nUnearthly(colleen) and Brew(colleen, louisette) -> Syphon(colleen, jasper)\nSyphon(jasper, louisette) and Brew(jasper, louisette) -> Unearthly(louisette)\nFurious(jasper) and Syphon(jasper, louisette) -> Brew(louisette, jasper)\nforall x (Hurt(x, jasper) and not Hurt(x, louisette) -> Hurt(louisette, colleen))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> not Hurt(x, colleen))\nforall x (Brew(x, colleen) -> Brew(x, louisette))\nforall x (Furious(x) -> not Veiled(x))\nforall x (Brew(x, colleen) and not Branched(x) -> Syphon(x, colleen))\n\nSyphon(colleen, colleen)\n\nforall x (Brew(x, colleen) and not Branched(x) -> Syphon(x, colleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The nissa breach the reeta. The nissa is not sealed. The nissa is staring. The nissa root the reeta. The nissa does not like the inez. The nissa position the reeta. The nissa position the inez. The reeta breach the inez. The reeta is sealed. The inez does not like the nissa. If the reeta is here and the reeta breach the inez then the reeta position the nissa. If the nissa position the inez and the nissa breach the inez then the inez is here. If the nissa is cringing and the nissa position the inez then the inez breach the nissa. If something root the nissa and it does not like the inez then the inez root the reeta. If something is here then it does not like the reeta. If something breach the reeta then it breach the inez. Big things are not staring. If something breach the reeta and it is not addicted then it position the reeta. The inez does not chase the inez.", "logic": "\nBreach(nissa, reeta)\nnot Sealed(nissa)\nStaring(nissa)\nRoot(nissa, reeta)\nnot Root(nissa, inez)\nPosition(nissa, reeta)\nPosition(nissa, inez)\nBreach(reeta, inez)\nSealed(reeta)\nnot Root(inez, nissa)\nHere(reeta) and Breach(reeta, inez) -> Position(reeta, nissa)\nPosition(nissa, inez) and Breach(nissa, inez) -> Here(inez)\nCringing(nissa) and Position(nissa, inez) -> Breach(inez, nissa)\nforall x (Root(x, nissa) and not Root(x, inez) -> Root(inez, reeta))\nforall x (Here(x) -> not Root(x, reeta))\nforall x (Breach(x, reeta) -> Breach(x, inez))\nforall x (Cringing(x) -> not Staring(x))\nforall x (Breach(x, reeta) and not Addicted(x) -> Position(x, reeta))\n\nnot Breach(inez, inez)\n\nforall x (Breach(x, reeta) -> Breach(x, inez)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The merla anglicise the loretta. The merla is not confused. The merla is unruffled. The merla gain the loretta. The merla does not like the guglielma. The merla actualize the loretta. The merla actualize the guglielma. The loretta anglicise the guglielma. The loretta is confused. The guglielma does not like the merla. If the loretta is ocellated and the loretta anglicise the guglielma then the loretta actualize the merla. If the merla actualize the guglielma and the merla anglicise the guglielma then the guglielma is ocellated. If the merla is public and the merla actualize the guglielma then the guglielma anglicise the merla. If something gain the merla and it does not like the guglielma then the guglielma gain the loretta. If something is ocellated then it does not like the loretta. If something anglicise the loretta then it anglicise the guglielma. Big things are not unruffled. If something anglicise the loretta and it is not undesigned then it actualize the loretta. The loretta actualize the merla.", "logic": "\nAnglicise(merla, loretta)\nnot Confused(merla)\nUnruffled(merla)\nGain(merla, loretta)\nnot Gain(merla, guglielma)\nActualize(merla, loretta)\nActualize(merla, guglielma)\nAnglicise(loretta, guglielma)\nConfused(loretta)\nnot Gain(guglielma, merla)\nOcellated(loretta) and Anglicise(loretta, guglielma) -> Actualize(loretta, merla)\nActualize(merla, guglielma) and Anglicise(merla, guglielma) -> Ocellated(guglielma)\nPublic(merla) and Actualize(merla, guglielma) -> Anglicise(guglielma, merla)\nforall x (Gain(x, merla) and not Gain(x, guglielma) -> Gain(guglielma, loretta))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> not Gain(x, loretta))\nforall x (Anglicise(x, loretta) -> Anglicise(x, guglielma))\nforall x (Public(x) -> not Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Anglicise(x, loretta) and not Undesigned(x) -> Actualize(x, loretta))\n\nActualize(loretta, merla)\n\nOcellated(loretta) and Anglicise(loretta, guglielma) -> Actualize(loretta, merla) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The corrine redecorate the peirce. The corrine is not asserting. The corrine is tonguelike. The corrine calibrate the peirce. The corrine does not like the amata. The corrine frap the peirce. The corrine frap the amata. The peirce redecorate the amata. The peirce is asserting. The amata does not like the corrine. If the peirce is malevolent and the peirce redecorate the amata then the peirce frap the corrine. If the corrine frap the amata and the corrine redecorate the amata then the amata is malevolent. If the corrine is pending and the corrine frap the amata then the amata redecorate the corrine. If something calibrate the corrine and it does not like the amata then the amata calibrate the peirce. If something is malevolent then it does not like the peirce. If something redecorate the peirce then it redecorate the amata. Big things are not tonguelike. If something redecorate the peirce and it is not auctorial then it frap the peirce. The amata is not asserting.", "logic": "\nRedecorate(corrine, peirce)\nnot Asserting(corrine)\nTonguelike(corrine)\nCalibrate(corrine, peirce)\nnot Calibrate(corrine, amata)\nFrap(corrine, peirce)\nFrap(corrine, amata)\nRedecorate(peirce, amata)\nAsserting(peirce)\nnot Calibrate(amata, corrine)\nMalevolent(peirce) and Redecorate(peirce, amata) -> Frap(peirce, corrine)\nFrap(corrine, amata) and Redecorate(corrine, amata) -> Malevolent(amata)\nPending(corrine) and Frap(corrine, amata) -> Redecorate(amata, corrine)\nforall x (Calibrate(x, corrine) and not Calibrate(x, amata) -> Calibrate(amata, peirce))\nforall x (Malevolent(x) -> not Calibrate(x, peirce))\nforall x (Redecorate(x, peirce) -> Redecorate(x, amata))\nforall x (Pending(x) -> not Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Redecorate(x, peirce) and not Auctorial(x) -> Frap(x, peirce))\n\nnot Asserting(amata)\n\nnot Asserting(amata) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The chancey identify the deirdre. The chancey is not common. The chancey is guileful. The chancey affiliate the deirdre. The chancey does not like the jereme. The chancey pulp the deirdre. The chancey pulp the jereme. The deirdre identify the jereme. The deirdre is common. The jereme does not like the chancey. If the deirdre is sudsy and the deirdre identify the jereme then the deirdre pulp the chancey. If the chancey pulp the jereme and the chancey identify the jereme then the jereme is sudsy. If the chancey is untapped and the chancey pulp the jereme then the jereme identify the chancey. If something affiliate the chancey and it does not like the jereme then the jereme affiliate the deirdre. If something is sudsy then it does not like the deirdre. If something identify the deirdre then it identify the jereme. Big things are not guileful. If something identify the deirdre and it is not elite then it pulp the deirdre. The deirdre is elite.", "logic": "\nIdentify(chancey, deirdre)\nnot Common(chancey)\nGuileful(chancey)\nAffiliate(chancey, deirdre)\nnot Affiliate(chancey, jereme)\nPulp(chancey, deirdre)\nPulp(chancey, jereme)\nIdentify(deirdre, jereme)\nCommon(deirdre)\nnot Affiliate(jereme, chancey)\nSudsy(deirdre) and Identify(deirdre, jereme) -> Pulp(deirdre, chancey)\nPulp(chancey, jereme) and Identify(chancey, jereme) -> Sudsy(jereme)\nUntapped(chancey) and Pulp(chancey, jereme) -> Identify(jereme, chancey)\nforall x (Affiliate(x, chancey) and not Affiliate(x, jereme) -> Affiliate(jereme, deirdre))\nforall x (Sudsy(x) -> not Affiliate(x, deirdre))\nforall x (Identify(x, deirdre) -> Identify(x, jereme))\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> not Guileful(x))\nforall x (Identify(x, deirdre) and not Elite(x) -> Pulp(x, deirdre))\n\nElite(deirdre)\n\nElite(deirdre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The dario larrup the francisca. The dario is not trochaic. The dario is endocrine. The dario ballyhoo the francisca. The dario does not like the josi. The dario reconvict the francisca. The dario reconvict the josi. The francisca larrup the josi. The francisca is trochaic. The josi does not like the dario. If the francisca is potbound and the francisca larrup the josi then the francisca reconvict the dario. If the dario reconvict the josi and the dario larrup the josi then the josi is potbound. If the dario is concessive and the dario reconvict the josi then the josi larrup the dario. If something ballyhoo the dario and it does not like the josi then the josi ballyhoo the francisca. If something is potbound then it does not like the francisca. If something larrup the francisca then it larrup the josi. Big things are not endocrine. If something larrup the francisca and it is not papillate then it reconvict the francisca. The francisca does not chase the dario.", "logic": "\nLarrup(dario, francisca)\nnot Trochaic(dario)\nEndocrine(dario)\nBallyhoo(dario, francisca)\nnot Ballyhoo(dario, josi)\nReconvict(dario, francisca)\nReconvict(dario, josi)\nLarrup(francisca, josi)\nTrochaic(francisca)\nnot Ballyhoo(josi, dario)\nPotbound(francisca) and Larrup(francisca, josi) -> Reconvict(francisca, dario)\nReconvict(dario, josi) and Larrup(dario, josi) -> Potbound(josi)\nConcessive(dario) and Reconvict(dario, josi) -> Larrup(josi, dario)\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, dario) and not Ballyhoo(x, josi) -> Ballyhoo(josi, francisca))\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> not Ballyhoo(x, francisca))\nforall x (Larrup(x, francisca) -> Larrup(x, josi))\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> not Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Larrup(x, francisca) and not Papillate(x) -> Reconvict(x, francisca))\n\nnot Larrup(francisca, dario)\n\nnot Larrup(francisca, dario) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The ozzy primp the jules. The ozzy is not mantic. The ozzy is araneidal. The ozzy flutter the jules. The ozzy does not like the abelard. The ozzy issue the jules. The ozzy issue the abelard. The jules primp the abelard. The jules is mantic. The abelard does not like the ozzy. If the jules is elastic and the jules primp the abelard then the jules issue the ozzy. If the ozzy issue the abelard and the ozzy primp the abelard then the abelard is elastic. If the ozzy is tyrolese and the ozzy issue the abelard then the abelard primp the ozzy. If something flutter the ozzy and it does not like the abelard then the abelard flutter the jules. If something is elastic then it does not like the jules. If something primp the jules then it primp the abelard. Big things are not araneidal. If something primp the jules and it is not ungraded then it issue the jules. The ozzy issue the ozzy.", "logic": "\nPrimp(ozzy, jules)\nnot Mantic(ozzy)\nAraneidal(ozzy)\nFlutter(ozzy, jules)\nnot Flutter(ozzy, abelard)\nIssue(ozzy, jules)\nIssue(ozzy, abelard)\nPrimp(jules, abelard)\nMantic(jules)\nnot Flutter(abelard, ozzy)\nElastic(jules) and Primp(jules, abelard) -> Issue(jules, ozzy)\nIssue(ozzy, abelard) and Primp(ozzy, abelard) -> Elastic(abelard)\nTyrolese(ozzy) and Issue(ozzy, abelard) -> Primp(abelard, ozzy)\nforall x (Flutter(x, ozzy) and not Flutter(x, abelard) -> Flutter(abelard, jules))\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> not Flutter(x, jules))\nforall x (Primp(x, jules) -> Primp(x, abelard))\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) -> not Araneidal(x))\nforall x (Primp(x, jules) and not Ungraded(x) -> Issue(x, jules))\n\nIssue(ozzy, ozzy)\n\nIssue(ozzy, ozzy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "Mischa is sacerdotal. Mischa is unfitting. Mischa is unsanded. Ariella is sacerdotal. Ariella is live. Ariella is afoul. Ariella is roughened. Ariella is unfitting. Ariella is unsanded. Ariella is aboral. Hunt is unfitting. Hunt is aboral. All unfitting, roughened people are aboral. Round people are afoul. Green people are aboral. Quiet, roughened people are aboral. If someone is unfitting and sacerdotal then they are live. Round, aboral people are roughened. Ariella is aboral.", "logic": "\nSacerdotal(mischa)\nUnfitting(mischa)\nUnsanded(mischa)\nSacerdotal(ariella)\nLive(ariella)\nAfoul(ariella)\nRoughened(ariella)\nUnfitting(ariella)\nUnsanded(ariella)\nAboral(ariella)\nUnfitting(hunt)\nAboral(hunt)\nforall x (Unfitting(x) and Roughened(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) -> Afoul(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Unfitting(x) and Roughened(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Unfitting(x) and Sacerdotal(x) -> Live(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) and Aboral(x) -> Roughened(x))\n\nAboral(ariella)\n\ntherefore Aboral(ariella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Melody is untitled. Melody is unswept. Melody is hatted. Dagmar is untitled. Dagmar is inedible. Dagmar is undefended. Dagmar is foetal. Dagmar is unswept. Dagmar is hatted. Dagmar is collinear. Harvey is unswept. Harvey is collinear. All unswept, foetal people are collinear. Round people are undefended. Green people are collinear. Quiet, foetal people are collinear. If someone is unswept and untitled then they are inedible. Round, collinear people are foetal. Melody is not untitled.", "logic": "\nUntitled(melody)\nUnswept(melody)\nHatted(melody)\nUntitled(dagmar)\nInedible(dagmar)\nUndefended(dagmar)\nFoetal(dagmar)\nUnswept(dagmar)\nHatted(dagmar)\nCollinear(dagmar)\nUnswept(harvey)\nCollinear(harvey)\nforall x (Unswept(x) and Foetal(x) -> Collinear(x))\nforall x (Hatted(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) -> Collinear(x))\nforall x (Unswept(x) and Foetal(x) -> Collinear(x))\nforall x (Unswept(x) and Untitled(x) -> Inedible(x))\nforall x (Hatted(x) and Collinear(x) -> Foetal(x))\n\nnot Untitled(melody)\n\ntherefore Untitled(melody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Shelagh is theatrical. Shelagh is outboard. Shelagh is tearing. Wes is theatrical. Wes is unhinged. Wes is alleviated. Wes is tragical. Wes is outboard. Wes is tearing. Wes is harmonised. Mitchel is outboard. Mitchel is harmonised. All outboard, tragical people are harmonised. Round people are alleviated. Green people are harmonised. Quiet, tragical people are harmonised. If someone is outboard and theatrical then they are unhinged. Round, harmonised people are tragical. Shelagh is alleviated.", "logic": "\nTheatrical(shelagh)\nOutboard(shelagh)\nTearing(shelagh)\nTheatrical(wes)\nUnhinged(wes)\nAlleviated(wes)\nTragical(wes)\nOutboard(wes)\nTearing(wes)\nHarmonised(wes)\nOutboard(mitchel)\nHarmonised(mitchel)\nforall x (Outboard(x) and Tragical(x) -> Harmonised(x))\nforall x (Tearing(x) -> Alleviated(x))\nforall x (Alleviated(x) -> Harmonised(x))\nforall x (Outboard(x) and Tragical(x) -> Harmonised(x))\nforall x (Outboard(x) and Theatrical(x) -> Unhinged(x))\nforall x (Tearing(x) and Harmonised(x) -> Tragical(x))\n\nAlleviated(shelagh)\n\nTearing(shelagh) and forall x (Tearing(x) -> Alleviated(x)) -> therefore Alleviated(shelagh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Garv is unwearying. Garv is lepidote. Garv is negro. Sandy is unwearying. Sandy is audile. Sandy is provable. Sandy is undesired. Sandy is lepidote. Sandy is negro. Sandy is oceangoing. Anthony is lepidote. Anthony is oceangoing. All lepidote, undesired people are oceangoing. Round people are provable. Green people are oceangoing. Quiet, undesired people are oceangoing. If someone is lepidote and unwearying then they are audile. Round, oceangoing people are undesired. Garv is not audile.", "logic": "\nUnwearying(garv)\nLepidote(garv)\nNegro(garv)\nUnwearying(sandy)\nAudile(sandy)\nProvable(sandy)\nUndesired(sandy)\nLepidote(sandy)\nNegro(sandy)\nOceangoing(sandy)\nLepidote(anthony)\nOceangoing(anthony)\nforall x (Lepidote(x) and Undesired(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Provable(x))\nforall x (Provable(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\nforall x (Lepidote(x) and Undesired(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\nforall x (Lepidote(x) and Unwearying(x) -> Audile(x))\nforall x (Negro(x) and Oceangoing(x) -> Undesired(x))\n\nnot Audile(garv)\n\nLepidote(garv) and Unwearying(garv) and forall x (Lepidote(x) and Unwearying(x) -> Audile(x)) -> therefore Audile(garv)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Cassandry is unwritten. Cassandry is superfine. Cassandry is chordate. Loni is unwritten. Loni is tapering. Loni is vermiform. Loni is fathomable. Loni is superfine. Loni is chordate. Loni is homophonic. Kimmi is superfine. Kimmi is homophonic. All superfine, fathomable people are homophonic. Round people are vermiform. Green people are homophonic. Quiet, fathomable people are homophonic. If someone is superfine and unwritten then they are tapering. Round, homophonic people are fathomable. Cassandry is homophonic.", "logic": "\nUnwritten(cassandry)\nSuperfine(cassandry)\nChordate(cassandry)\nUnwritten(loni)\nTapering(loni)\nVermiform(loni)\nFathomable(loni)\nSuperfine(loni)\nChordate(loni)\nHomophonic(loni)\nSuperfine(kimmi)\nHomophonic(kimmi)\nforall x (Superfine(x) and Fathomable(x) -> Homophonic(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) -> Vermiform(x))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Homophonic(x))\nforall x (Superfine(x) and Fathomable(x) -> Homophonic(x))\nforall x (Superfine(x) and Unwritten(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Homophonic(x) -> Fathomable(x))\n\nHomophonic(cassandry)\n\nChordate(cassandry) and forall x (Chordate(x) -> Vermiform(x)) -> therefore Vermiform(cassandry) Vermiform(cassandry) and forall x (Vermiform(x) -> Homophonic(x)) -> therefore Homophonic(cassandry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Chrystal is unintended. Chrystal is dynastic. Chrystal is activating. Brittney is unintended. Brittney is zoological. Brittney is tricksy. Brittney is gratis. Brittney is dynastic. Brittney is activating. Brittney is tangerine. Gershon is dynastic. Gershon is tangerine. All dynastic, gratis people are tangerine. Round people are tricksy. Green people are tangerine. Quiet, gratis people are tangerine. If someone is dynastic and unintended then they are zoological. Round, tangerine people are gratis. Chrystal is not tangerine.", "logic": "\nUnintended(chrystal)\nDynastic(chrystal)\nActivating(chrystal)\nUnintended(brittney)\nZoological(brittney)\nTricksy(brittney)\nGratis(brittney)\nDynastic(brittney)\nActivating(brittney)\nTangerine(brittney)\nDynastic(gershon)\nTangerine(gershon)\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and Gratis(x) -> Tangerine(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) -> Tricksy(x))\nforall x (Tricksy(x) -> Tangerine(x))\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and Gratis(x) -> Tangerine(x))\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and Unintended(x) -> Zoological(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) and Tangerine(x) -> Gratis(x))\n\nnot Tangerine(chrystal)\n\nActivating(chrystal) and forall x (Activating(x) -> Tricksy(x)) -> therefore Tricksy(chrystal) Tricksy(chrystal) and forall x (Tricksy(x) -> Tangerine(x)) -> therefore Tangerine(chrystal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Janie is umbellate. Janie is landed. Janie is wrecked. Demetre is umbellate. Demetre is rabbinic. Demetre is haematic. Demetre is silky. Demetre is landed. Demetre is wrecked. Demetre is glum. Darian is landed. Darian is glum. All landed, silky people are glum. Round people are haematic. Green people are glum. Quiet, silky people are glum. If someone is landed and umbellate then they are rabbinic. Round, glum people are silky. Janie is silky.", "logic": "\nUmbellate(janie)\nLanded(janie)\nWrecked(janie)\nUmbellate(demetre)\nRabbinic(demetre)\nHaematic(demetre)\nSilky(demetre)\nLanded(demetre)\nWrecked(demetre)\nGlum(demetre)\nLanded(darian)\nGlum(darian)\nforall x (Landed(x) and Silky(x) -> Glum(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> Haematic(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) -> Glum(x))\nforall x (Landed(x) and Silky(x) -> Glum(x))\nforall x (Landed(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Rabbinic(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) and Glum(x) -> Silky(x))\n\nSilky(janie)\n\nWrecked(janie) and forall x (Wrecked(x) -> Haematic(x)) -> therefore Haematic(janie) Haematic(janie) and forall x (Haematic(x) -> Glum(x)) -> therefore Glum(janie) Wrecked(janie) and Glum(janie) and forall x (Wrecked(x) and Glum(x) -> Silky(x)) -> therefore Silky(janie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Norah is flinty. Norah is sliding. Norah is northeast. Whitney is flinty. Whitney is catatonic. Whitney is childless. Whitney is spunky. Whitney is sliding. Whitney is northeast. Whitney is fuzzed. Margie is sliding. Margie is fuzzed. All sliding, spunky people are fuzzed. Round people are childless. Green people are fuzzed. Quiet, spunky people are fuzzed. If someone is sliding and flinty then they are catatonic. Round, fuzzed people are spunky. Norah is not spunky.", "logic": "\nFlinty(norah)\nSliding(norah)\nNortheast(norah)\nFlinty(whitney)\nCatatonic(whitney)\nChildless(whitney)\nSpunky(whitney)\nSliding(whitney)\nNortheast(whitney)\nFuzzed(whitney)\nSliding(margie)\nFuzzed(margie)\nforall x (Sliding(x) and Spunky(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Northeast(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Sliding(x) and Spunky(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Sliding(x) and Flinty(x) -> Catatonic(x))\nforall x (Northeast(x) and Fuzzed(x) -> Spunky(x))\n\nnot Spunky(norah)\n\nNortheast(norah) and forall x (Northeast(x) -> Childless(x)) -> therefore Childless(norah) Childless(norah) and forall x (Childless(x) -> Fuzzed(x)) -> therefore Fuzzed(norah) Northeast(norah) and Fuzzed(norah) and forall x (Northeast(x) and Fuzzed(x) -> Spunky(x)) -> therefore Spunky(norah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Eudora is corporate. Eudora is brotherly. Eudora is albinal. Udell is corporate. Udell is frenetic. Udell is vocative. Udell is excusatory. Udell is brotherly. Udell is albinal. Udell is tractive. Linda is brotherly. Linda is tractive. All brotherly, excusatory people are tractive. Round people are vocative. Green people are tractive. Quiet, excusatory people are tractive. If someone is brotherly and corporate then they are frenetic. Round, tractive people are excusatory. Linda is not vocative.", "logic": "\nCorporate(eudora)\nBrotherly(eudora)\nAlbinal(eudora)\nCorporate(udell)\nFrenetic(udell)\nVocative(udell)\nExcusatory(udell)\nBrotherly(udell)\nAlbinal(udell)\nTractive(udell)\nBrotherly(linda)\nTractive(linda)\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and Excusatory(x) -> Tractive(x))\nforall x (Albinal(x) -> Vocative(x))\nforall x (Vocative(x) -> Tractive(x))\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and Excusatory(x) -> Tractive(x))\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and Corporate(x) -> Frenetic(x))\nforall x (Albinal(x) and Tractive(x) -> Excusatory(x))\n\nnot Vocative(linda)\n\nforall x (Albinal(x) -> Vocative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Annalisa is northward. Annalisa is exsanguine. Annalisa is foul. Cain is northward. Cain is gluey. Cain is hitless. Cain is begrimed. Cain is exsanguine. Cain is foul. Cain is cordate. Demetris is exsanguine. Demetris is cordate. All exsanguine, begrimed people are cordate. Round people are hitless. Green people are cordate. Quiet, begrimed people are cordate. If someone is exsanguine and northward then they are gluey. Round, cordate people are begrimed. Demetris is gluey.", "logic": "\nNorthward(annalisa)\nExsanguine(annalisa)\nFoul(annalisa)\nNorthward(cain)\nGluey(cain)\nHitless(cain)\nBegrimed(cain)\nExsanguine(cain)\nFoul(cain)\nCordate(cain)\nExsanguine(demetris)\nCordate(demetris)\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Begrimed(x) -> Cordate(x))\nforall x (Foul(x) -> Hitless(x))\nforall x (Hitless(x) -> Cordate(x))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Begrimed(x) -> Cordate(x))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Northward(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Foul(x) and Cordate(x) -> Begrimed(x))\n\nGluey(demetris)\n\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Northward(x) -> Gluey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Dion is blonde. Dion is comburent. Dion is adducting. Marabel is blonde. Marabel is mediocre. Marabel is mineral. Marabel is enveloping. Marabel is comburent. Marabel is adducting. Marabel is laniary. Felicia is comburent. Felicia is laniary. All comburent, enveloping people are laniary. Round people are mineral. Green people are laniary. Quiet, enveloping people are laniary. If someone is comburent and blonde then they are mediocre. Round, laniary people are enveloping. Felicia is not enveloping.", "logic": "\nBlonde(dion)\nComburent(dion)\nAdducting(dion)\nBlonde(marabel)\nMediocre(marabel)\nMineral(marabel)\nEnveloping(marabel)\nComburent(marabel)\nAdducting(marabel)\nLaniary(marabel)\nComburent(felicia)\nLaniary(felicia)\nforall x (Comburent(x) and Enveloping(x) -> Laniary(x))\nforall x (Adducting(x) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Mineral(x) -> Laniary(x))\nforall x (Comburent(x) and Enveloping(x) -> Laniary(x))\nforall x (Comburent(x) and Blonde(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Adducting(x) and Laniary(x) -> Enveloping(x))\n\nnot Enveloping(felicia)\n\nforall x (Adducting(x) and Laniary(x) -> Enveloping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Shana is breeding. Shana is literary. Shana is antipodal. Shelby is breeding. Shelby is beguiled. Shelby is awed. Shelby is undomestic. Shelby is literary. Shelby is antipodal. Shelby is capetian. Selle is literary. Selle is capetian. All literary, undomestic people are capetian. Round people are awed. Green people are capetian. Quiet, undomestic people are capetian. If someone is literary and breeding then they are beguiled. Round, capetian people are undomestic. Selle is antipodal.", "logic": "\nBreeding(shana)\nLiterary(shana)\nAntipodal(shana)\nBreeding(shelby)\nBeguiled(shelby)\nAwed(shelby)\nUndomestic(shelby)\nLiterary(shelby)\nAntipodal(shelby)\nCapetian(shelby)\nLiterary(selle)\nCapetian(selle)\nforall x (Literary(x) and Undomestic(x) -> Capetian(x))\nforall x (Antipodal(x) -> Awed(x))\nforall x (Awed(x) -> Capetian(x))\nforall x (Literary(x) and Undomestic(x) -> Capetian(x))\nforall x (Literary(x) and Breeding(x) -> Beguiled(x))\nforall x (Antipodal(x) and Capetian(x) -> Undomestic(x))\n\nAntipodal(selle)\n\nAntipodal(selle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "August is forcible. Tildie is moonlit. All forcible things are moonlit. If Tildie is forcible then Tildie is simplified. If August is moonlit then August is simplified. If August is simplified and August is azonic then August is cheery. Smart, cheery things are waterborne. If August is moonlit then August is cheery. If August is waterborne and August is moonlit then August is forcible. Rough, angry things are simplified. Tildie is moonlit.", "logic": "\nForcible(august)\nMoonlit(tildie)\nforall x (Forcible(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nForcible(tildie) -> Simplified(tildie)\nMoonlit(august) -> Simplified(august)\nSimplified(august) and Azonic(august) -> Cheery(august)\nforall x (Forcible(x) and Cheery(x) -> Waterborne(x))\nMoonlit(august) -> Cheery(august)\nWaterborne(august) and Moonlit(august) -> Forcible(august)\nforall x (Azonic(x) and Angry(x) -> Simplified(x))\n\nMoonlit(tildie)\n\ntherefore Moonlit(tildie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Debi is informal. Griswold is testicular. All informal things are testicular. If Griswold is informal then Griswold is lowbrow. If Debi is testicular then Debi is lowbrow. If Debi is lowbrow and Debi is alchemic then Debi is thoughtful. Smart, thoughtful things are departed. If Debi is testicular then Debi is thoughtful. If Debi is departed and Debi is testicular then Debi is informal. Rough, beginning things are lowbrow. Griswold is not testicular.", "logic": "\nInformal(debi)\nTesticular(griswold)\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Testicular(x))\nInformal(griswold) -> Lowbrow(griswold)\nTesticular(debi) -> Lowbrow(debi)\nLowbrow(debi) and Alchemic(debi) -> Thoughtful(debi)\nforall x (Informal(x) and Thoughtful(x) -> Departed(x))\nTesticular(debi) -> Thoughtful(debi)\nDeparted(debi) and Testicular(debi) -> Informal(debi)\nforall x (Alchemic(x) and Beginning(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\n\nnot Testicular(griswold)\n\ntherefore Testicular(griswold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Walther is contorted. Manfred is morganatic. All contorted things are morganatic. If Manfred is contorted then Manfred is varnished. If Walther is morganatic then Walther is varnished. If Walther is varnished and Walther is purgative then Walther is equanimous. Smart, equanimous things are faux. If Walther is morganatic then Walther is equanimous. If Walther is faux and Walther is morganatic then Walther is contorted. Rough, aeonian things are varnished. Walther is morganatic.", "logic": "\nContorted(walther)\nMorganatic(manfred)\nforall x (Contorted(x) -> Morganatic(x))\nContorted(manfred) -> Varnished(manfred)\nMorganatic(walther) -> Varnished(walther)\nVarnished(walther) and Purgative(walther) -> Equanimous(walther)\nforall x (Contorted(x) and Equanimous(x) -> Faux(x))\nMorganatic(walther) -> Equanimous(walther)\nFaux(walther) and Morganatic(walther) -> Contorted(walther)\nforall x (Purgative(x) and Aeonian(x) -> Varnished(x))\n\nMorganatic(walther)\n\nContorted(walther) and forall x (Contorted(x) -> Morganatic(x)) -> therefore Morganatic(walther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Dagmar is upper. Sharie is pyrectic. All upper things are pyrectic. If Sharie is upper then Sharie is unrimed. If Dagmar is pyrectic then Dagmar is unrimed. If Dagmar is unrimed and Dagmar is unfree then Dagmar is disrupted. Smart, disrupted things are supplicant. If Dagmar is pyrectic then Dagmar is disrupted. If Dagmar is supplicant and Dagmar is pyrectic then Dagmar is upper. Rough, kosher things are unrimed. Dagmar is not pyrectic.", "logic": "\nUpper(dagmar)\nPyrectic(sharie)\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Pyrectic(x))\nUpper(sharie) -> Unrimed(sharie)\nPyrectic(dagmar) -> Unrimed(dagmar)\nUnrimed(dagmar) and Unfree(dagmar) -> Disrupted(dagmar)\nforall x (Upper(x) and Disrupted(x) -> Supplicant(x))\nPyrectic(dagmar) -> Disrupted(dagmar)\nSupplicant(dagmar) and Pyrectic(dagmar) -> Upper(dagmar)\nforall x (Unfree(x) and Kosher(x) -> Unrimed(x))\n\nnot Pyrectic(dagmar)\n\nUpper(dagmar) and forall x (Upper(x) -> Pyrectic(x)) -> therefore Pyrectic(dagmar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Josepha is decreed. Murielle is figured. All decreed things are figured. If Murielle is decreed then Murielle is uncheerful. If Josepha is figured then Josepha is uncheerful. If Josepha is uncheerful and Josepha is shady then Josepha is profitable. Smart, profitable things are indelible. If Josepha is figured then Josepha is profitable. If Josepha is indelible and Josepha is figured then Josepha is decreed. Rough, myocardial things are uncheerful. Josepha is uncheerful.", "logic": "\nDecreed(josepha)\nFigured(murielle)\nforall x (Decreed(x) -> Figured(x))\nDecreed(murielle) -> Uncheerful(murielle)\nFigured(josepha) -> Uncheerful(josepha)\nUncheerful(josepha) and Shady(josepha) -> Profitable(josepha)\nforall x (Decreed(x) and Profitable(x) -> Indelible(x))\nFigured(josepha) -> Profitable(josepha)\nIndelible(josepha) and Figured(josepha) -> Decreed(josepha)\nforall x (Shady(x) and Myocardial(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\n\nUncheerful(josepha)\n\nDecreed(josepha) and forall x (Decreed(x) -> Figured(x)) -> therefore Figured(josepha) Figured(josepha) and Figured(josepha) -> Uncheerful(josepha) -> therefore Uncheerful(josepha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Nanci is netted. Savina is nosocomial. All netted things are nosocomial. If Savina is netted then Savina is frequent. If Nanci is nosocomial then Nanci is frequent. If Nanci is frequent and Nanci is incestuous then Nanci is somalian. Smart, somalian things are oriental. If Nanci is nosocomial then Nanci is somalian. If Nanci is oriental and Nanci is nosocomial then Nanci is netted. Rough, apolitical things are frequent. Nanci is not somalian.", "logic": "\nNetted(nanci)\nNosocomial(savina)\nforall x (Netted(x) -> Nosocomial(x))\nNetted(savina) -> Frequent(savina)\nNosocomial(nanci) -> Frequent(nanci)\nFrequent(nanci) and Incestuous(nanci) -> Somalian(nanci)\nforall x (Netted(x) and Somalian(x) -> Oriental(x))\nNosocomial(nanci) -> Somalian(nanci)\nOriental(nanci) and Nosocomial(nanci) -> Netted(nanci)\nforall x (Incestuous(x) and Apolitical(x) -> Frequent(x))\n\nnot Somalian(nanci)\n\nNetted(nanci) and forall x (Netted(x) -> Nosocomial(x)) -> therefore Nosocomial(nanci) Nosocomial(nanci) and Nosocomial(nanci) -> Somalian(nanci) -> therefore Somalian(nanci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Davis is semiliquid. Cynthia is mensal. All semiliquid things are mensal. If Cynthia is semiliquid then Cynthia is baroque. If Davis is mensal then Davis is baroque. If Davis is baroque and Davis is silky then Davis is fetal. Smart, fetal things are britannic. If Davis is mensal then Davis is fetal. If Davis is britannic and Davis is mensal then Davis is semiliquid. Rough, faddy things are baroque. Davis is britannic.", "logic": "\nSemiliquid(davis)\nMensal(cynthia)\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Mensal(x))\nSemiliquid(cynthia) -> Baroque(cynthia)\nMensal(davis) -> Baroque(davis)\nBaroque(davis) and Silky(davis) -> Fetal(davis)\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Fetal(x) -> Britannic(x))\nMensal(davis) -> Fetal(davis)\nBritannic(davis) and Mensal(davis) -> Semiliquid(davis)\nforall x (Silky(x) and Faddy(x) -> Baroque(x))\n\nBritannic(davis)\n\nSemiliquid(davis) and forall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Mensal(x)) -> therefore Mensal(davis) Mensal(davis) and Mensal(davis) -> Fetal(davis) -> therefore Fetal(davis) Semiliquid(davis) and Fetal(davis) and forall x (Semiliquid(x) and Fetal(x) -> Britannic(x)) -> therefore Britannic(davis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Gerianne is crenated. Merrily is smarmy. All crenated things are smarmy. If Merrily is crenated then Merrily is trifoliate. If Gerianne is smarmy then Gerianne is trifoliate. If Gerianne is trifoliate and Gerianne is effete then Gerianne is formalized. Smart, formalized things are aeschylean. If Gerianne is smarmy then Gerianne is formalized. If Gerianne is aeschylean and Gerianne is smarmy then Gerianne is crenated. Rough, electrical things are trifoliate. Gerianne is not aeschylean.", "logic": "\nCrenated(gerianne)\nSmarmy(merrily)\nforall x (Crenated(x) -> Smarmy(x))\nCrenated(merrily) -> Trifoliate(merrily)\nSmarmy(gerianne) -> Trifoliate(gerianne)\nTrifoliate(gerianne) and Effete(gerianne) -> Formalized(gerianne)\nforall x (Crenated(x) and Formalized(x) -> Aeschylean(x))\nSmarmy(gerianne) -> Formalized(gerianne)\nAeschylean(gerianne) and Smarmy(gerianne) -> Crenated(gerianne)\nforall x (Effete(x) and Electrical(x) -> Trifoliate(x))\n\nnot Aeschylean(gerianne)\n\nCrenated(gerianne) and forall x (Crenated(x) -> Smarmy(x)) -> therefore Smarmy(gerianne) Smarmy(gerianne) and Smarmy(gerianne) -> Formalized(gerianne) -> therefore Formalized(gerianne) Crenated(gerianne) and Formalized(gerianne) and forall x (Crenated(x) and Formalized(x) -> Aeschylean(x)) -> therefore Aeschylean(gerianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Rhett is epistemic. Sapphire is overlooked. All epistemic things are overlooked. If Sapphire is epistemic then Sapphire is heartening. If Rhett is overlooked then Rhett is heartening. If Rhett is heartening and Rhett is victorian then Rhett is roman. Smart, roman things are flush. If Rhett is overlooked then Rhett is roman. If Rhett is flush and Rhett is overlooked then Rhett is epistemic. Rough, extrusive things are heartening. Sapphire is not flush.", "logic": "\nEpistemic(rhett)\nOverlooked(sapphire)\nforall x (Epistemic(x) -> Overlooked(x))\nEpistemic(sapphire) -> Heartening(sapphire)\nOverlooked(rhett) -> Heartening(rhett)\nHeartening(rhett) and Victorian(rhett) -> Roman(rhett)\nforall x (Epistemic(x) and Roman(x) -> Flush(x))\nOverlooked(rhett) -> Roman(rhett)\nFlush(rhett) and Overlooked(rhett) -> Epistemic(rhett)\nforall x (Victorian(x) and Extrusive(x) -> Heartening(x))\n\nnot Flush(sapphire)\n\nforall x (Epistemic(x) and Roman(x) -> Flush(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Diahann is mingy. Lilith is dazzled. All mingy things are dazzled. If Lilith is mingy then Lilith is nonrigid. If Diahann is dazzled then Diahann is nonrigid. If Diahann is nonrigid and Diahann is supperless then Diahann is nurturant. Smart, nurturant things are vermillion. If Diahann is dazzled then Diahann is nurturant. If Diahann is vermillion and Diahann is dazzled then Diahann is mingy. Rough, diarrheic things are nonrigid. Lilith is nonrigid.", "logic": "\nMingy(diahann)\nDazzled(lilith)\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nMingy(lilith) -> Nonrigid(lilith)\nDazzled(diahann) -> Nonrigid(diahann)\nNonrigid(diahann) and Supperless(diahann) -> Nurturant(diahann)\nforall x (Mingy(x) and Nurturant(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nDazzled(diahann) -> Nurturant(diahann)\nVermillion(diahann) and Dazzled(diahann) -> Mingy(diahann)\nforall x (Supperless(x) and Diarrheic(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\n\nNonrigid(lilith)\n\nMingy(lilith) -> Nonrigid(lilith) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Adore is transonic. Humbert is unagitated. All transonic things are unagitated. If Humbert is transonic then Humbert is metabolous. If Adore is unagitated then Adore is metabolous. If Adore is metabolous and Adore is towheaded then Adore is minuscular. Smart, minuscular things are aneurysmal. If Adore is unagitated then Adore is minuscular. If Adore is aneurysmal and Adore is unagitated then Adore is transonic. Rough, plethoric things are metabolous. Humbert is not minuscular.", "logic": "\nTransonic(adore)\nUnagitated(humbert)\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Unagitated(x))\nTransonic(humbert) -> Metabolous(humbert)\nUnagitated(adore) -> Metabolous(adore)\nMetabolous(adore) and Towheaded(adore) -> Minuscular(adore)\nforall x (Transonic(x) and Minuscular(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nUnagitated(adore) -> Minuscular(adore)\nAneurysmal(adore) and Unagitated(adore) -> Transonic(adore)\nforall x (Towheaded(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Metabolous(x))\n\nnot Minuscular(humbert)\n\nnot Minuscular(humbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Ilysa is worldwide. Hussein is hypoactive. All worldwide things are hypoactive. If Hussein is worldwide then Hussein is unratable. If Ilysa is hypoactive then Ilysa is unratable. If Ilysa is unratable and Ilysa is jellylike then Ilysa is subatomic. Smart, subatomic things are infuriated. If Ilysa is hypoactive then Ilysa is subatomic. If Ilysa is infuriated and Ilysa is hypoactive then Ilysa is worldwide. Rough, divorced things are unratable. Hussein is divorced.", "logic": "\nWorldwide(ilysa)\nHypoactive(hussein)\nforall x (Worldwide(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nWorldwide(hussein) -> Unratable(hussein)\nHypoactive(ilysa) -> Unratable(ilysa)\nUnratable(ilysa) and Jellylike(ilysa) -> Subatomic(ilysa)\nforall x (Worldwide(x) and Subatomic(x) -> Infuriated(x))\nHypoactive(ilysa) -> Subatomic(ilysa)\nInfuriated(ilysa) and Hypoactive(ilysa) -> Worldwide(ilysa)\nforall x (Jellylike(x) and Divorced(x) -> Unratable(x))\n\nDivorced(hussein)\n\nDivorced(hussein) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Kassie is beamy. Chase is pursy. All beamy things are pursy. If Chase is beamy then Chase is dolorous. If Kassie is pursy then Kassie is dolorous. If Kassie is dolorous and Kassie is incidental then Kassie is jainist. Smart, jainist things are amitotic. If Kassie is pursy then Kassie is jainist. If Kassie is amitotic and Kassie is pursy then Kassie is beamy. Rough, umbilicate things are dolorous. Chase is not incidental.", "logic": "\nBeamy(kassie)\nPursy(chase)\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Pursy(x))\nBeamy(chase) -> Dolorous(chase)\nPursy(kassie) -> Dolorous(kassie)\nDolorous(kassie) and Incidental(kassie) -> Jainist(kassie)\nforall x (Beamy(x) and Jainist(x) -> Amitotic(x))\nPursy(kassie) -> Jainist(kassie)\nAmitotic(kassie) and Pursy(kassie) -> Beamy(kassie)\nforall x (Incidental(x) and Umbilicate(x) -> Dolorous(x))\n\nnot Incidental(chase)\n\nnot Incidental(chase) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Felita is estrous. Ange is platelike. All estrous things are platelike. If Ange is estrous then Ange is crass. If Felita is platelike then Felita is crass. If Felita is crass and Felita is venerating then Felita is wrinkled. Smart, wrinkled things are moraceous. If Felita is platelike then Felita is wrinkled. If Felita is moraceous and Felita is platelike then Felita is estrous. Rough, systemic things are crass. Ange is estrous.", "logic": "\nEstrous(felita)\nPlatelike(ange)\nforall x (Estrous(x) -> Platelike(x))\nEstrous(ange) -> Crass(ange)\nPlatelike(felita) -> Crass(felita)\nCrass(felita) and Venerating(felita) -> Wrinkled(felita)\nforall x (Estrous(x) and Wrinkled(x) -> Moraceous(x))\nPlatelike(felita) -> Wrinkled(felita)\nMoraceous(felita) and Platelike(felita) -> Estrous(felita)\nforall x (Venerating(x) and Systemic(x) -> Crass(x))\n\nEstrous(ange)\n\nEstrous(ange) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Lenna is viceregal. Mollie is bicornuous. All viceregal things are bicornuous. If Mollie is viceregal then Mollie is mushy. If Lenna is bicornuous then Lenna is mushy. If Lenna is mushy and Lenna is reported then Lenna is myopic. Smart, myopic things are censored. If Lenna is bicornuous then Lenna is myopic. If Lenna is censored and Lenna is bicornuous then Lenna is viceregal. Rough, tenderized things are mushy. Lenna is not tenderized.", "logic": "\nViceregal(lenna)\nBicornuous(mollie)\nforall x (Viceregal(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nViceregal(mollie) -> Mushy(mollie)\nBicornuous(lenna) -> Mushy(lenna)\nMushy(lenna) and Reported(lenna) -> Myopic(lenna)\nforall x (Viceregal(x) and Myopic(x) -> Censored(x))\nBicornuous(lenna) -> Myopic(lenna)\nCensored(lenna) and Bicornuous(lenna) -> Viceregal(lenna)\nforall x (Reported(x) and Tenderized(x) -> Mushy(x))\n\nnot Tenderized(lenna)\n\nnot Tenderized(lenna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Jennings is haptic. Betsy is boracic. All haptic things are boracic. If Betsy is haptic then Betsy is redeeming. If Jennings is boracic then Jennings is redeeming. If Jennings is redeeming and Jennings is borderline then Jennings is incoherent. Smart, incoherent things are atrip. If Jennings is boracic then Jennings is incoherent. If Jennings is atrip and Jennings is boracic then Jennings is haptic. Rough, retained things are redeeming. Jennings is borderline.", "logic": "\nHaptic(jennings)\nBoracic(betsy)\nforall x (Haptic(x) -> Boracic(x))\nHaptic(betsy) -> Redeeming(betsy)\nBoracic(jennings) -> Redeeming(jennings)\nRedeeming(jennings) and Borderline(jennings) -> Incoherent(jennings)\nforall x (Haptic(x) and Incoherent(x) -> Atrip(x))\nBoracic(jennings) -> Incoherent(jennings)\nAtrip(jennings) and Boracic(jennings) -> Haptic(jennings)\nforall x (Borderline(x) and Retained(x) -> Redeeming(x))\n\nBorderline(jennings)\n\nBorderline(jennings) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "The terence refurbish the lisbeth. The terence refurbish the kelila. The terence intertwine the bertram. The lisbeth is algophobic. The lisbeth is downmarket. The lisbeth is punitory. The bertram shore the kelila. The bertram refurbish the lisbeth. The bertram intertwine the terence. The kelila is algophobic. The kelila shore the lisbeth. The kelila shore the bertram. If something intertwine the bertram and the bertram shore the lisbeth then it is algophobic. If something intertwine the terence then it is downmarket. If something refurbish the kelila and it intertwine the bertram then it is handy. If something is punitory and it refurbish the terence then it shore the lisbeth. If something refurbish the lisbeth then it shore the terence. If the bertram refurbish the lisbeth then the bertram is handy. If the bertram shore the lisbeth then the bertram is downmarket. If something is downmarket then it shore the lisbeth. The kelila is algophobic.", "logic": "\nRefurbish(terence, lisbeth)\nRefurbish(terence, kelila)\nIntertwine(terence, bertram)\nAlgophobic(lisbeth)\nDownmarket(lisbeth)\nPunitory(lisbeth)\nShore(bertram, kelila)\nRefurbish(bertram, lisbeth)\nIntertwine(bertram, terence)\nAlgophobic(kelila)\nShore(kelila, lisbeth)\nShore(kelila, bertram)\nforall x (Intertwine(x, bertram) and Shore(bertram, lisbeth) -> Algophobic(x))\nforall x (Intertwine(x, terence) -> Downmarket(x))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, kelila) and Intertwine(x, bertram) -> Handy(x))\nforall x (Punitory(x) and Refurbish(x, terence) -> Shore(x, lisbeth))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, lisbeth) -> Shore(x, terence))\nRefurbish(bertram, lisbeth) -> Handy(bertram)\nShore(bertram, lisbeth) -> Downmarket(bertram)\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> Shore(x, lisbeth))\n\nAlgophobic(kelila)\n\ntherefore Algophobic(kelila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The stig unwire the jana. The stig unwire the ursuline. The stig compute the tierney. The jana is overdue. The jana is hypodermal. The jana is uninjured. The tierney prim the ursuline. The tierney unwire the jana. The tierney compute the stig. The ursuline is overdue. The ursuline prim the jana. The ursuline prim the tierney. If something compute the tierney and the tierney prim the jana then it is overdue. If something compute the stig then it is hypodermal. If something unwire the ursuline and it compute the tierney then it is cetacean. If something is uninjured and it unwire the stig then it prim the jana. If something unwire the jana then it prim the stig. If the tierney unwire the jana then the tierney is cetacean. If the tierney prim the jana then the tierney is hypodermal. If something is hypodermal then it prim the jana. The stig does not need the ursuline.", "logic": "\nUnwire(stig, jana)\nUnwire(stig, ursuline)\nCompute(stig, tierney)\nOverdue(jana)\nHypodermal(jana)\nUninjured(jana)\nPrim(tierney, ursuline)\nUnwire(tierney, jana)\nCompute(tierney, stig)\nOverdue(ursuline)\nPrim(ursuline, jana)\nPrim(ursuline, tierney)\nforall x (Compute(x, tierney) and Prim(tierney, jana) -> Overdue(x))\nforall x (Compute(x, stig) -> Hypodermal(x))\nforall x (Unwire(x, ursuline) and Compute(x, tierney) -> Cetacean(x))\nforall x (Uninjured(x) and Unwire(x, stig) -> Prim(x, jana))\nforall x (Unwire(x, jana) -> Prim(x, stig))\nUnwire(tierney, jana) -> Cetacean(tierney)\nPrim(tierney, jana) -> Hypodermal(tierney)\nforall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Prim(x, jana))\n\nnot Unwire(stig, ursuline)\n\ntherefore Unwire(stig, ursuline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The rawley egress the rania. The rawley egress the jodi. The rawley hoodwink the mmarianne. The rania is splanchnic. The rania is thalassic. The rania is floodlit. The mmarianne doff the jodi. The mmarianne egress the rania. The mmarianne hoodwink the rawley. The jodi is splanchnic. The jodi doff the rania. The jodi doff the mmarianne. If something hoodwink the mmarianne and the mmarianne doff the rania then it is splanchnic. If something hoodwink the rawley then it is thalassic. If something egress the jodi and it hoodwink the mmarianne then it is ectopic. If something is floodlit and it egress the rawley then it doff the rania. If something egress the rania then it doff the rawley. If the mmarianne egress the rania then the mmarianne is ectopic. If the mmarianne doff the rania then the mmarianne is thalassic. If something is thalassic then it doff the rania. The rania doff the rania.", "logic": "\nEgress(rawley, rania)\nEgress(rawley, jodi)\nHoodwink(rawley, mmarianne)\nSplanchnic(rania)\nThalassic(rania)\nFloodlit(rania)\nDoff(mmarianne, jodi)\nEgress(mmarianne, rania)\nHoodwink(mmarianne, rawley)\nSplanchnic(jodi)\nDoff(jodi, rania)\nDoff(jodi, mmarianne)\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, mmarianne) and Doff(mmarianne, rania) -> Splanchnic(x))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, rawley) -> Thalassic(x))\nforall x (Egress(x, jodi) and Hoodwink(x, mmarianne) -> Ectopic(x))\nforall x (Floodlit(x) and Egress(x, rawley) -> Doff(x, rania))\nforall x (Egress(x, rania) -> Doff(x, rawley))\nEgress(mmarianne, rania) -> Ectopic(mmarianne)\nDoff(mmarianne, rania) -> Thalassic(mmarianne)\nforall x (Thalassic(x) -> Doff(x, rania))\n\nDoff(rania, rania)\n\nThalassic(rania) and forall x (Thalassic(x) -> Doff(x, rania)) -> therefore Doff(rania, rania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The mohammed decorate the janith. The mohammed decorate the ashton. The mohammed unhook the henry. The janith is dividable. The janith is shady. The janith is perceptive. The henry rebuke the ashton. The henry decorate the janith. The henry unhook the mohammed. The ashton is dividable. The ashton rebuke the janith. The ashton rebuke the henry. If something unhook the henry and the henry rebuke the janith then it is dividable. If something unhook the mohammed then it is shady. If something decorate the ashton and it unhook the henry then it is unsound. If something is perceptive and it decorate the mohammed then it rebuke the janith. If something decorate the janith then it rebuke the mohammed. If the henry decorate the janith then the henry is unsound. If the henry rebuke the janith then the henry is shady. If something is shady then it rebuke the janith. The henry is not shady.", "logic": "\nDecorate(mohammed, janith)\nDecorate(mohammed, ashton)\nUnhook(mohammed, henry)\nDividable(janith)\nShady(janith)\nPerceptive(janith)\nRebuke(henry, ashton)\nDecorate(henry, janith)\nUnhook(henry, mohammed)\nDividable(ashton)\nRebuke(ashton, janith)\nRebuke(ashton, henry)\nforall x (Unhook(x, henry) and Rebuke(henry, janith) -> Dividable(x))\nforall x (Unhook(x, mohammed) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Decorate(x, ashton) and Unhook(x, henry) -> Unsound(x))\nforall x (Perceptive(x) and Decorate(x, mohammed) -> Rebuke(x, janith))\nforall x (Decorate(x, janith) -> Rebuke(x, mohammed))\nDecorate(henry, janith) -> Unsound(henry)\nRebuke(henry, janith) -> Shady(henry)\nforall x (Shady(x) -> Rebuke(x, janith))\n\nnot Shady(henry)\n\nUnhook(henry, mohammed) and forall x (Unhook(x, mohammed) -> Shady(x)) -> therefore Shady(henry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The charleen tomahawk the clarisse. The charleen tomahawk the stephenie. The charleen cocoon the andri. The clarisse is embezzled. The clarisse is isocyclic. The clarisse is leafy. The andri formalise the stephenie. The andri tomahawk the clarisse. The andri cocoon the charleen. The stephenie is embezzled. The stephenie formalise the clarisse. The stephenie formalise the andri. If something cocoon the andri and the andri formalise the clarisse then it is embezzled. If something cocoon the charleen then it is isocyclic. If something tomahawk the stephenie and it cocoon the andri then it is untagged. If something is leafy and it tomahawk the charleen then it formalise the clarisse. If something tomahawk the clarisse then it formalise the charleen. If the andri tomahawk the clarisse then the andri is untagged. If the andri formalise the clarisse then the andri is isocyclic. If something is isocyclic then it formalise the clarisse. The andri formalise the clarisse.", "logic": "\nTomahawk(charleen, clarisse)\nTomahawk(charleen, stephenie)\nCocoon(charleen, andri)\nEmbezzled(clarisse)\nIsocyclic(clarisse)\nLeafy(clarisse)\nFormalise(andri, stephenie)\nTomahawk(andri, clarisse)\nCocoon(andri, charleen)\nEmbezzled(stephenie)\nFormalise(stephenie, clarisse)\nFormalise(stephenie, andri)\nforall x (Cocoon(x, andri) and Formalise(andri, clarisse) -> Embezzled(x))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, charleen) -> Isocyclic(x))\nforall x (Tomahawk(x, stephenie) and Cocoon(x, andri) -> Untagged(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) and Tomahawk(x, charleen) -> Formalise(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Tomahawk(x, clarisse) -> Formalise(x, charleen))\nTomahawk(andri, clarisse) -> Untagged(andri)\nFormalise(andri, clarisse) -> Isocyclic(andri)\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) -> Formalise(x, clarisse))\n\nFormalise(andri, clarisse)\n\nCocoon(andri, charleen) and forall x (Cocoon(x, charleen) -> Isocyclic(x)) -> therefore Isocyclic(andri) Isocyclic(andri) and forall x (Isocyclic(x) -> Formalise(x, clarisse)) -> therefore Formalise(andri, clarisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The emeline snare the starla. The emeline snare the andriette. The emeline budge the sherlock. The starla is encircling. The starla is rubber. The starla is aweary. The sherlock captivate the andriette. The sherlock snare the starla. The sherlock budge the emeline. The andriette is encircling. The andriette captivate the starla. The andriette captivate the sherlock. If something budge the sherlock and the sherlock captivate the starla then it is encircling. If something budge the emeline then it is rubber. If something snare the andriette and it budge the sherlock then it is noxious. If something is aweary and it snare the emeline then it captivate the starla. If something snare the starla then it captivate the emeline. If the sherlock snare the starla then the sherlock is noxious. If the sherlock captivate the starla then the sherlock is rubber. If something is rubber then it captivate the starla. The sherlock does not like the starla.", "logic": "\nSnare(emeline, starla)\nSnare(emeline, andriette)\nBudge(emeline, sherlock)\nEncircling(starla)\nRubber(starla)\nAweary(starla)\nCaptivate(sherlock, andriette)\nSnare(sherlock, starla)\nBudge(sherlock, emeline)\nEncircling(andriette)\nCaptivate(andriette, starla)\nCaptivate(andriette, sherlock)\nforall x (Budge(x, sherlock) and Captivate(sherlock, starla) -> Encircling(x))\nforall x (Budge(x, emeline) -> Rubber(x))\nforall x (Snare(x, andriette) and Budge(x, sherlock) -> Noxious(x))\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Snare(x, emeline) -> Captivate(x, starla))\nforall x (Snare(x, starla) -> Captivate(x, emeline))\nSnare(sherlock, starla) -> Noxious(sherlock)\nCaptivate(sherlock, starla) -> Rubber(sherlock)\nforall x (Rubber(x) -> Captivate(x, starla))\n\nnot Captivate(sherlock, starla)\n\nBudge(sherlock, emeline) and forall x (Budge(x, emeline) -> Rubber(x)) -> therefore Rubber(sherlock) Rubber(sherlock) and forall x (Rubber(x) -> Captivate(x, starla)) -> therefore Captivate(sherlock, starla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The gustavo flock the yvonne. The gustavo flock the calvin. The gustavo swathe the callida. The yvonne is melting. The yvonne is loaded. The yvonne is located. The callida chip the calvin. The callida flock the yvonne. The callida swathe the gustavo. The calvin is melting. The calvin chip the yvonne. The calvin chip the callida. If something swathe the callida and the callida chip the yvonne then it is melting. If something swathe the gustavo then it is loaded. If something flock the calvin and it swathe the callida then it is neotenic. If something is located and it flock the gustavo then it chip the yvonne. If something flock the yvonne then it chip the gustavo. If the callida flock the yvonne then the callida is neotenic. If the callida chip the yvonne then the callida is loaded. If something is loaded then it chip the yvonne. The gustavo is melting.", "logic": "\nFlock(gustavo, yvonne)\nFlock(gustavo, calvin)\nSwathe(gustavo, callida)\nMelting(yvonne)\nLoaded(yvonne)\nLocated(yvonne)\nChip(callida, calvin)\nFlock(callida, yvonne)\nSwathe(callida, gustavo)\nMelting(calvin)\nChip(calvin, yvonne)\nChip(calvin, callida)\nforall x (Swathe(x, callida) and Chip(callida, yvonne) -> Melting(x))\nforall x (Swathe(x, gustavo) -> Loaded(x))\nforall x (Flock(x, calvin) and Swathe(x, callida) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Located(x) and Flock(x, gustavo) -> Chip(x, yvonne))\nforall x (Flock(x, yvonne) -> Chip(x, gustavo))\nFlock(callida, yvonne) -> Neotenic(callida)\nChip(callida, yvonne) -> Loaded(callida)\nforall x (Loaded(x) -> Chip(x, yvonne))\n\nMelting(gustavo)\n\nSwathe(callida, gustavo) and forall x (Swathe(x, gustavo) -> Loaded(x)) -> therefore Loaded(callida) Loaded(callida) and forall x (Loaded(x) -> Chip(x, yvonne)) -> therefore Chip(callida, yvonne) Swathe(gustavo, callida) and Chip(callida, yvonne) and forall x (Swathe(x, callida) and Chip(callida, yvonne) -> Melting(x)) -> therefore Melting(gustavo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The nike outgrow the roxane. The nike outgrow the mariska. The nike disincline the reggis. The roxane is inflowing. The roxane is mutualist. The roxane is married. The reggis flood the mariska. The reggis outgrow the roxane. The reggis disincline the nike. The mariska is inflowing. The mariska flood the roxane. The mariska flood the reggis. If something disincline the reggis and the reggis flood the roxane then it is inflowing. If something disincline the nike then it is mutualist. If something outgrow the mariska and it disincline the reggis then it is outdoor. If something is married and it outgrow the nike then it flood the roxane. If something outgrow the roxane then it flood the nike. If the reggis outgrow the roxane then the reggis is outdoor. If the reggis flood the roxane then the reggis is mutualist. If something is mutualist then it flood the roxane. The nike is not inflowing.", "logic": "\nOutgrow(nike, roxane)\nOutgrow(nike, mariska)\nDisincline(nike, reggis)\nInflowing(roxane)\nMutualist(roxane)\nMarried(roxane)\nFlood(reggis, mariska)\nOutgrow(reggis, roxane)\nDisincline(reggis, nike)\nInflowing(mariska)\nFlood(mariska, roxane)\nFlood(mariska, reggis)\nforall x (Disincline(x, reggis) and Flood(reggis, roxane) -> Inflowing(x))\nforall x (Disincline(x, nike) -> Mutualist(x))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, mariska) and Disincline(x, reggis) -> Outdoor(x))\nforall x (Married(x) and Outgrow(x, nike) -> Flood(x, roxane))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, roxane) -> Flood(x, nike))\nOutgrow(reggis, roxane) -> Outdoor(reggis)\nFlood(reggis, roxane) -> Mutualist(reggis)\nforall x (Mutualist(x) -> Flood(x, roxane))\n\nnot Inflowing(nike)\n\nDisincline(reggis, nike) and forall x (Disincline(x, nike) -> Mutualist(x)) -> therefore Mutualist(reggis) Mutualist(reggis) and forall x (Mutualist(x) -> Flood(x, roxane)) -> therefore Flood(reggis, roxane) Disincline(nike, reggis) and Flood(reggis, roxane) and forall x (Disincline(x, reggis) and Flood(reggis, roxane) -> Inflowing(x)) -> therefore Inflowing(nike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The ozzie shack the erik. The ozzie shack the andriana. The ozzie undock the cassandre. The erik is activated. The erik is myeloid. The erik is admittable. The cassandre beshrew the andriana. The cassandre shack the erik. The cassandre undock the ozzie. The andriana is activated. The andriana beshrew the erik. The andriana beshrew the cassandre. If something undock the cassandre and the cassandre beshrew the erik then it is activated. If something undock the ozzie then it is myeloid. If something shack the andriana and it undock the cassandre then it is ignitable. If something is admittable and it shack the ozzie then it beshrew the erik. If something shack the erik then it beshrew the ozzie. If the cassandre shack the erik then the cassandre is ignitable. If the cassandre beshrew the erik then the cassandre is myeloid. If something is myeloid then it beshrew the erik. The andriana is not ignitable.", "logic": "\nShack(ozzie, erik)\nShack(ozzie, andriana)\nUndock(ozzie, cassandre)\nActivated(erik)\nMyeloid(erik)\nAdmittable(erik)\nBeshrew(cassandre, andriana)\nShack(cassandre, erik)\nUndock(cassandre, ozzie)\nActivated(andriana)\nBeshrew(andriana, erik)\nBeshrew(andriana, cassandre)\nforall x (Undock(x, cassandre) and Beshrew(cassandre, erik) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Undock(x, ozzie) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Shack(x, andriana) and Undock(x, cassandre) -> Ignitable(x))\nforall x (Admittable(x) and Shack(x, ozzie) -> Beshrew(x, erik))\nforall x (Shack(x, erik) -> Beshrew(x, ozzie))\nShack(cassandre, erik) -> Ignitable(cassandre)\nBeshrew(cassandre, erik) -> Myeloid(cassandre)\nforall x (Myeloid(x) -> Beshrew(x, erik))\n\nnot Ignitable(andriana)\n\nforall x (Shack(x, andriana) and Undock(x, cassandre) -> Ignitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The gustaf silver the ruthy. The gustaf silver the lotta. The gustaf sandblast the mart. The ruthy is glued. The ruthy is semitropic. The ruthy is hawaiian. The mart factorize the lotta. The mart silver the ruthy. The mart sandblast the gustaf. The lotta is glued. The lotta factorize the ruthy. The lotta factorize the mart. If something sandblast the mart and the mart factorize the ruthy then it is glued. If something sandblast the gustaf then it is semitropic. If something silver the lotta and it sandblast the mart then it is monecious. If something is hawaiian and it silver the gustaf then it factorize the ruthy. If something silver the ruthy then it factorize the gustaf. If the mart silver the ruthy then the mart is monecious. If the mart factorize the ruthy then the mart is semitropic. If something is semitropic then it factorize the ruthy. The mart is glued.", "logic": "\nSilver(gustaf, ruthy)\nSilver(gustaf, lotta)\nSandblast(gustaf, mart)\nGlued(ruthy)\nSemitropic(ruthy)\nHawaiian(ruthy)\nFactorize(mart, lotta)\nSilver(mart, ruthy)\nSandblast(mart, gustaf)\nGlued(lotta)\nFactorize(lotta, ruthy)\nFactorize(lotta, mart)\nforall x (Sandblast(x, mart) and Factorize(mart, ruthy) -> Glued(x))\nforall x (Sandblast(x, gustaf) -> Semitropic(x))\nforall x (Silver(x, lotta) and Sandblast(x, mart) -> Monecious(x))\nforall x (Hawaiian(x) and Silver(x, gustaf) -> Factorize(x, ruthy))\nforall x (Silver(x, ruthy) -> Factorize(x, gustaf))\nSilver(mart, ruthy) -> Monecious(mart)\nFactorize(mart, ruthy) -> Semitropic(mart)\nforall x (Semitropic(x) -> Factorize(x, ruthy))\n\nGlued(mart)\n\nforall x (Sandblast(x, mart) and Factorize(mart, ruthy) -> Glued(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The karim kneel the christian. The karim kneel the adolphe. The karim disjoin the berte. The christian is untwisted. The christian is carolean. The christian is inst. The berte inflict the adolphe. The berte kneel the christian. The berte disjoin the karim. The adolphe is untwisted. The adolphe inflict the christian. The adolphe inflict the berte. If something disjoin the berte and the berte inflict the christian then it is untwisted. If something disjoin the karim then it is carolean. If something kneel the adolphe and it disjoin the berte then it is exportable. If something is inst and it kneel the karim then it inflict the christian. If something kneel the christian then it inflict the karim. If the berte kneel the christian then the berte is exportable. If the berte inflict the christian then the berte is carolean. If something is carolean then it inflict the christian. The adolphe is not carolean.", "logic": "\nKneel(karim, christian)\nKneel(karim, adolphe)\nDisjoin(karim, berte)\nUntwisted(christian)\nCarolean(christian)\nInst(christian)\nInflict(berte, adolphe)\nKneel(berte, christian)\nDisjoin(berte, karim)\nUntwisted(adolphe)\nInflict(adolphe, christian)\nInflict(adolphe, berte)\nforall x (Disjoin(x, berte) and Inflict(berte, christian) -> Untwisted(x))\nforall x (Disjoin(x, karim) -> Carolean(x))\nforall x (Kneel(x, adolphe) and Disjoin(x, berte) -> Exportable(x))\nforall x (Inst(x) and Kneel(x, karim) -> Inflict(x, christian))\nforall x (Kneel(x, christian) -> Inflict(x, karim))\nKneel(berte, christian) -> Exportable(berte)\nInflict(berte, christian) -> Carolean(berte)\nforall x (Carolean(x) -> Inflict(x, christian))\n\nnot Carolean(adolphe)\n\nforall x (Disjoin(x, karim) -> Carolean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The robina drip the fabio. The robina drip the stefa. The robina bypass the ernaline. The fabio is xenogeneic. The fabio is sanitized. The fabio is bismuthal. The ernaline plagiarise the stefa. The ernaline drip the fabio. The ernaline bypass the robina. The stefa is xenogeneic. The stefa plagiarise the fabio. The stefa plagiarise the ernaline. If something bypass the ernaline and the ernaline plagiarise the fabio then it is xenogeneic. If something bypass the robina then it is sanitized. If something drip the stefa and it bypass the ernaline then it is lymphoid. If something is bismuthal and it drip the robina then it plagiarise the fabio. If something drip the fabio then it plagiarise the robina. If the ernaline drip the fabio then the ernaline is lymphoid. If the ernaline plagiarise the fabio then the ernaline is sanitized. If something is sanitized then it plagiarise the fabio. The robina plagiarise the fabio.", "logic": "\nDrip(robina, fabio)\nDrip(robina, stefa)\nBypass(robina, ernaline)\nXenogeneic(fabio)\nSanitized(fabio)\nBismuthal(fabio)\nPlagiarise(ernaline, stefa)\nDrip(ernaline, fabio)\nBypass(ernaline, robina)\nXenogeneic(stefa)\nPlagiarise(stefa, fabio)\nPlagiarise(stefa, ernaline)\nforall x (Bypass(x, ernaline) and Plagiarise(ernaline, fabio) -> Xenogeneic(x))\nforall x (Bypass(x, robina) -> Sanitized(x))\nforall x (Drip(x, stefa) and Bypass(x, ernaline) -> Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) and Drip(x, robina) -> Plagiarise(x, fabio))\nforall x (Drip(x, fabio) -> Plagiarise(x, robina))\nDrip(ernaline, fabio) -> Lymphoid(ernaline)\nPlagiarise(ernaline, fabio) -> Sanitized(ernaline)\nforall x (Sanitized(x) -> Plagiarise(x, fabio))\n\nPlagiarise(robina, fabio)\n\nforall x (Sanitized(x) -> Plagiarise(x, fabio)) <- forall x (Bypass(x, robina) -> Sanitized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The saunder whizz the napoleon. The saunder whizz the marlow. The saunder hurt the thomasina. The napoleon is packed. The napoleon is instant. The napoleon is riddled. The thomasina hone the marlow. The thomasina whizz the napoleon. The thomasina hurt the saunder. The marlow is packed. The marlow hone the napoleon. The marlow hone the thomasina. If something hurt the thomasina and the thomasina hone the napoleon then it is packed. If something hurt the saunder then it is instant. If something whizz the marlow and it hurt the thomasina then it is cliched. If something is riddled and it whizz the saunder then it hone the napoleon. If something whizz the napoleon then it hone the saunder. If the thomasina whizz the napoleon then the thomasina is cliched. If the thomasina hone the napoleon then the thomasina is instant. If something is instant then it hone the napoleon. The napoleon does not visit the marlow.", "logic": "\nWhizz(saunder, napoleon)\nWhizz(saunder, marlow)\nHurt(saunder, thomasina)\nPacked(napoleon)\nInstant(napoleon)\nRiddled(napoleon)\nHone(thomasina, marlow)\nWhizz(thomasina, napoleon)\nHurt(thomasina, saunder)\nPacked(marlow)\nHone(marlow, napoleon)\nHone(marlow, thomasina)\nforall x (Hurt(x, thomasina) and Hone(thomasina, napoleon) -> Packed(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x, saunder) -> Instant(x))\nforall x (Whizz(x, marlow) and Hurt(x, thomasina) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Riddled(x) and Whizz(x, saunder) -> Hone(x, napoleon))\nforall x (Whizz(x, napoleon) -> Hone(x, saunder))\nWhizz(thomasina, napoleon) -> Cliched(thomasina)\nHone(thomasina, napoleon) -> Instant(thomasina)\nforall x (Instant(x) -> Hone(x, napoleon))\n\nnot Hurt(napoleon, marlow)\n\nnot Hurt(napoleon, marlow) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The dorthy bootlick the jabez. The dorthy bootlick the lulita. The dorthy clang the ishmael. The jabez is bigeminal. The jabez is sciolistic. The jabez is motivating. The ishmael regroup the lulita. The ishmael bootlick the jabez. The ishmael clang the dorthy. The lulita is bigeminal. The lulita regroup the jabez. The lulita regroup the ishmael. If something clang the ishmael and the ishmael regroup the jabez then it is bigeminal. If something clang the dorthy then it is sciolistic. If something bootlick the lulita and it clang the ishmael then it is showery. If something is motivating and it bootlick the dorthy then it regroup the jabez. If something bootlick the jabez then it regroup the dorthy. If the ishmael bootlick the jabez then the ishmael is showery. If the ishmael regroup the jabez then the ishmael is sciolistic. If something is sciolistic then it regroup the jabez. The jabez clang the jabez.", "logic": "\nBootlick(dorthy, jabez)\nBootlick(dorthy, lulita)\nClang(dorthy, ishmael)\nBigeminal(jabez)\nSciolistic(jabez)\nMotivating(jabez)\nRegroup(ishmael, lulita)\nBootlick(ishmael, jabez)\nClang(ishmael, dorthy)\nBigeminal(lulita)\nRegroup(lulita, jabez)\nRegroup(lulita, ishmael)\nforall x (Clang(x, ishmael) and Regroup(ishmael, jabez) -> Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Clang(x, dorthy) -> Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (Bootlick(x, lulita) and Clang(x, ishmael) -> Showery(x))\nforall x (Motivating(x) and Bootlick(x, dorthy) -> Regroup(x, jabez))\nforall x (Bootlick(x, jabez) -> Regroup(x, dorthy))\nBootlick(ishmael, jabez) -> Showery(ishmael)\nRegroup(ishmael, jabez) -> Sciolistic(ishmael)\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) -> Regroup(x, jabez))\n\nClang(jabez, jabez)\n\nClang(jabez, jabez) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The vitoria illumine the katharyn. The vitoria illumine the tann. The vitoria lavish the clinten. The katharyn is ovine. The katharyn is earthen. The katharyn is agonadal. The clinten postdate the tann. The clinten illumine the katharyn. The clinten lavish the vitoria. The tann is ovine. The tann postdate the katharyn. The tann postdate the clinten. If something lavish the clinten and the clinten postdate the katharyn then it is ovine. If something lavish the vitoria then it is earthen. If something illumine the tann and it lavish the clinten then it is coiled. If something is agonadal and it illumine the vitoria then it postdate the katharyn. If something illumine the katharyn then it postdate the vitoria. If the clinten illumine the katharyn then the clinten is coiled. If the clinten postdate the katharyn then the clinten is earthen. If something is earthen then it postdate the katharyn. The vitoria is not agonadal.", "logic": "\nIllumine(vitoria, katharyn)\nIllumine(vitoria, tann)\nLavish(vitoria, clinten)\nOvine(katharyn)\nEarthen(katharyn)\nAgonadal(katharyn)\nPostdate(clinten, tann)\nIllumine(clinten, katharyn)\nLavish(clinten, vitoria)\nOvine(tann)\nPostdate(tann, katharyn)\nPostdate(tann, clinten)\nforall x (Lavish(x, clinten) and Postdate(clinten, katharyn) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x, vitoria) -> Earthen(x))\nforall x (Illumine(x, tann) and Lavish(x, clinten) -> Coiled(x))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and Illumine(x, vitoria) -> Postdate(x, katharyn))\nforall x (Illumine(x, katharyn) -> Postdate(x, vitoria))\nIllumine(clinten, katharyn) -> Coiled(clinten)\nPostdate(clinten, katharyn) -> Earthen(clinten)\nforall x (Earthen(x) -> Postdate(x, katharyn))\n\nnot Agonadal(vitoria)\n\nnot Agonadal(vitoria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The leann disturb the brodie. The leann disturb the gerome. The leann blister the flora. The brodie is evoked. The brodie is dopey. The brodie is primeval. The flora vanquish the gerome. The flora disturb the brodie. The flora blister the leann. The gerome is evoked. The gerome vanquish the brodie. The gerome vanquish the flora. If something blister the flora and the flora vanquish the brodie then it is evoked. If something blister the leann then it is dopey. If something disturb the gerome and it blister the flora then it is maiden. If something is primeval and it disturb the leann then it vanquish the brodie. If something disturb the brodie then it vanquish the leann. If the flora disturb the brodie then the flora is maiden. If the flora vanquish the brodie then the flora is dopey. If something is dopey then it vanquish the brodie. The gerome disturb the gerome.", "logic": "\nDisturb(leann, brodie)\nDisturb(leann, gerome)\nBlister(leann, flora)\nEvoked(brodie)\nDopey(brodie)\nPrimeval(brodie)\nVanquish(flora, gerome)\nDisturb(flora, brodie)\nBlister(flora, leann)\nEvoked(gerome)\nVanquish(gerome, brodie)\nVanquish(gerome, flora)\nforall x (Blister(x, flora) and Vanquish(flora, brodie) -> Evoked(x))\nforall x (Blister(x, leann) -> Dopey(x))\nforall x (Disturb(x, gerome) and Blister(x, flora) -> Maiden(x))\nforall x (Primeval(x) and Disturb(x, leann) -> Vanquish(x, brodie))\nforall x (Disturb(x, brodie) -> Vanquish(x, leann))\nDisturb(flora, brodie) -> Maiden(flora)\nVanquish(flora, brodie) -> Dopey(flora)\nforall x (Dopey(x) -> Vanquish(x, brodie))\n\nDisturb(gerome, gerome)\n\nDisturb(gerome, gerome) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The charlean placard the theodosia. The rissa does not like the charlean. The savina is mensural. The theodosia wolf the rissa. If something wolf the theodosia then it does not eat the theodosia. If something is yeatsian and it placard the rissa then the rissa is dusty. If something is cacogenic and dusty then it does not like the theodosia. If something is yeatsian then it does not visit the charlean. If something is cacogenic then it is yeatsian. If something wolf the rissa and it flex the savina then the rissa flex the theodosia. If something placard the theodosia then the theodosia is cacogenic. If something is attentive and not dusty then it is mensural. The charlean placard the theodosia.", "logic": "\nPlacard(charlean, theodosia)\nnot Flex(rissa, charlean)\nMensural(savina)\nWolf(theodosia, rissa)\nforall x (Wolf(x, theodosia) -> not Placard(x, theodosia))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and Placard(x, rissa) -> Dusty(rissa))\nforall x (Cacogenic(x) and Dusty(x) -> not Flex(x, theodosia))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) -> not Wolf(x, charlean))\nforall x (Cacogenic(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Wolf(x, rissa) and Flex(x, savina) -> Flex(rissa, theodosia))\nforall x (Placard(x, theodosia) -> Cacogenic(theodosia))\nforall x (Attentive(x) and not Dusty(x) -> Mensural(x))\n\nPlacard(charlean, theodosia)\n\ntherefore Placard(charlean, theodosia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The kellsie retract the daphna. The ray does not like the kellsie. The mervin is exonerated. The daphna twist the ray. If something twist the daphna then it does not eat the daphna. If something is rushlike and it retract the ray then the ray is biting. If something is awry and biting then it does not like the daphna. If something is rushlike then it does not visit the kellsie. If something is awry then it is rushlike. If something twist the ray and it subsist the mervin then the ray subsist the daphna. If something retract the daphna then the daphna is awry. If something is meningeal and not biting then it is exonerated. The ray subsist the kellsie.", "logic": "\nRetract(kellsie, daphna)\nnot Subsist(ray, kellsie)\nExonerated(mervin)\nTwist(daphna, ray)\nforall x (Twist(x, daphna) -> not Retract(x, daphna))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) and Retract(x, ray) -> Biting(ray))\nforall x (Awry(x) and Biting(x) -> not Subsist(x, daphna))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) -> not Twist(x, kellsie))\nforall x (Awry(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Twist(x, ray) and Subsist(x, mervin) -> Subsist(ray, daphna))\nforall x (Retract(x, daphna) -> Awry(daphna))\nforall x (Meningeal(x) and not Biting(x) -> Exonerated(x))\n\nSubsist(ray, kellsie)\n\ntherefore not Subsist(ray, kellsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The lorrin scoot the gretta. The patrik does not like the lorrin. The patrice is methodist. The gretta bloat the patrik. If something bloat the gretta then it does not eat the gretta. If something is spectacled and it scoot the patrik then the patrik is twenty. If something is derisory and twenty then it does not like the gretta. If something is spectacled then it does not visit the lorrin. If something is derisory then it is spectacled. If something bloat the patrik and it immolate the patrice then the patrik immolate the gretta. If something scoot the gretta then the gretta is derisory. If something is unweary and not twenty then it is methodist. The gretta is derisory.", "logic": "\nScoot(lorrin, gretta)\nnot Immolate(patrik, lorrin)\nMethodist(patrice)\nBloat(gretta, patrik)\nforall x (Bloat(x, gretta) -> not Scoot(x, gretta))\nforall x (Spectacled(x) and Scoot(x, patrik) -> Twenty(patrik))\nforall x (Derisory(x) and Twenty(x) -> not Immolate(x, gretta))\nforall x (Spectacled(x) -> not Bloat(x, lorrin))\nforall x (Derisory(x) -> Spectacled(x))\nforall x (Bloat(x, patrik) and Immolate(x, patrice) -> Immolate(patrik, gretta))\nforall x (Scoot(x, gretta) -> Derisory(gretta))\nforall x (Unweary(x) and not Twenty(x) -> Methodist(x))\n\nDerisory(gretta)\n\nScoot(lorrin, gretta) and forall x (Scoot(x, gretta) -> Derisory(gretta)) -> therefore Derisory(gretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The mauricio fight the oliy. The renae does not like the mauricio. The modesty is kookie. The oliy aromatise the renae. If something aromatise the oliy then it does not eat the oliy. If something is purplish and it fight the renae then the renae is bursiform. If something is axillary and bursiform then it does not like the oliy. If something is purplish then it does not visit the mauricio. If something is axillary then it is purplish. If something aromatise the renae and it mock the modesty then the renae mock the oliy. If something fight the oliy then the oliy is axillary. If something is anasarcous and not bursiform then it is kookie. The oliy is not axillary.", "logic": "\nFight(mauricio, oliy)\nnot Mock(renae, mauricio)\nKookie(modesty)\nAromatise(oliy, renae)\nforall x (Aromatise(x, oliy) -> not Fight(x, oliy))\nforall x (Purplish(x) and Fight(x, renae) -> Bursiform(renae))\nforall x (Axillary(x) and Bursiform(x) -> not Mock(x, oliy))\nforall x (Purplish(x) -> not Aromatise(x, mauricio))\nforall x (Axillary(x) -> Purplish(x))\nforall x (Aromatise(x, renae) and Mock(x, modesty) -> Mock(renae, oliy))\nforall x (Fight(x, oliy) -> Axillary(oliy))\nforall x (Anasarcous(x) and not Bursiform(x) -> Kookie(x))\n\nnot Axillary(oliy)\n\nFight(mauricio, oliy) and forall x (Fight(x, oliy) -> Axillary(oliy)) -> therefore Axillary(oliy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The felita hammer the lukas. The katrine does not like the felita. The gerald is viewless. The lukas guess the katrine. If something guess the lukas then it does not eat the lukas. If something is stainable and it hammer the katrine then the katrine is venal. If something is mindful and venal then it does not like the lukas. If something is stainable then it does not visit the felita. If something is mindful then it is stainable. If something guess the katrine and it oppress the gerald then the katrine oppress the lukas. If something hammer the lukas then the lukas is mindful. If something is algonkian and not venal then it is viewless. The lukas is stainable.", "logic": "\nHammer(felita, lukas)\nnot Oppress(katrine, felita)\nViewless(gerald)\nGuess(lukas, katrine)\nforall x (Guess(x, lukas) -> not Hammer(x, lukas))\nforall x (Stainable(x) and Hammer(x, katrine) -> Venal(katrine))\nforall x (Mindful(x) and Venal(x) -> not Oppress(x, lukas))\nforall x (Stainable(x) -> not Guess(x, felita))\nforall x (Mindful(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Guess(x, katrine) and Oppress(x, gerald) -> Oppress(katrine, lukas))\nforall x (Hammer(x, lukas) -> Mindful(lukas))\nforall x (Algonkian(x) and not Venal(x) -> Viewless(x))\n\nStainable(lukas)\n\nHammer(felita, lukas) and forall x (Hammer(x, lukas) -> Mindful(lukas)) -> therefore Mindful(lukas) Mindful(lukas) and forall x (Mindful(x) -> Stainable(x)) -> therefore Stainable(lukas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The eleonora sieve the arabel. The melodie does not like the eleonora. The rosmunda is reputable. The arabel optimise the melodie. If something optimise the arabel then it does not eat the arabel. If something is unhallowed and it sieve the melodie then the melodie is plantal. If something is fourpenny and plantal then it does not like the arabel. If something is unhallowed then it does not visit the eleonora. If something is fourpenny then it is unhallowed. If something optimise the melodie and it charge the rosmunda then the melodie charge the arabel. If something sieve the arabel then the arabel is fourpenny. If something is edible and not plantal then it is reputable. The arabel is not unhallowed.", "logic": "\nSieve(eleonora, arabel)\nnot Charge(melodie, eleonora)\nReputable(rosmunda)\nOptimise(arabel, melodie)\nforall x (Optimise(x, arabel) -> not Sieve(x, arabel))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and Sieve(x, melodie) -> Plantal(melodie))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) and Plantal(x) -> not Charge(x, arabel))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) -> not Optimise(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) -> Unhallowed(x))\nforall x (Optimise(x, melodie) and Charge(x, rosmunda) -> Charge(melodie, arabel))\nforall x (Sieve(x, arabel) -> Fourpenny(arabel))\nforall x (Edible(x) and not Plantal(x) -> Reputable(x))\n\nnot Unhallowed(arabel)\n\nSieve(eleonora, arabel) and forall x (Sieve(x, arabel) -> Fourpenny(arabel)) -> therefore Fourpenny(arabel) Fourpenny(arabel) and forall x (Fourpenny(x) -> Unhallowed(x)) -> therefore Unhallowed(arabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The jilleen phonate the kenton. The neysa does not like the jilleen. The laural is bivalve. The kenton blanket the neysa. If something blanket the kenton then it does not eat the kenton. If something is fewest and it phonate the neysa then the neysa is wrecked. If something is braless and wrecked then it does not like the kenton. If something is fewest then it does not visit the jilleen. If something is braless then it is fewest. If something blanket the neysa and it recumb the laural then the neysa recumb the kenton. If something phonate the kenton then the kenton is braless. If something is expiratory and not wrecked then it is bivalve. The kenton does not visit the jilleen.", "logic": "\nPhonate(jilleen, kenton)\nnot Recumb(neysa, jilleen)\nBivalve(laural)\nBlanket(kenton, neysa)\nforall x (Blanket(x, kenton) -> not Phonate(x, kenton))\nforall x (Fewest(x) and Phonate(x, neysa) -> Wrecked(neysa))\nforall x (Braless(x) and Wrecked(x) -> not Recumb(x, kenton))\nforall x (Fewest(x) -> not Blanket(x, jilleen))\nforall x (Braless(x) -> Fewest(x))\nforall x (Blanket(x, neysa) and Recumb(x, laural) -> Recumb(neysa, kenton))\nforall x (Phonate(x, kenton) -> Braless(kenton))\nforall x (Expiratory(x) and not Wrecked(x) -> Bivalve(x))\n\nnot Blanket(kenton, jilleen)\n\nPhonate(jilleen, kenton) and forall x (Phonate(x, kenton) -> Braless(kenton)) -> therefore Braless(kenton) Braless(kenton) and forall x (Braless(x) -> Fewest(x)) -> therefore Fewest(kenton) Fewest(kenton) and forall x (Fewest(x) -> not Blanket(x, jilleen)) -> therefore not Blanket(kenton, jilleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The cheslie proclaim the erastus. The stormi does not like the cheslie. The katine is waxy. The erastus harmonise the stormi. If something harmonise the erastus then it does not eat the erastus. If something is ursine and it proclaim the stormi then the stormi is isochronal. If something is elder and isochronal then it does not like the erastus. If something is ursine then it does not visit the cheslie. If something is elder then it is ursine. If something harmonise the stormi and it dictate the katine then the stormi dictate the erastus. If something proclaim the erastus then the erastus is elder. If something is doddery and not isochronal then it is waxy. The erastus harmonise the cheslie.", "logic": "\nProclaim(cheslie, erastus)\nnot Dictate(stormi, cheslie)\nWaxy(katine)\nHarmonise(erastus, stormi)\nforall x (Harmonise(x, erastus) -> not Proclaim(x, erastus))\nforall x (Ursine(x) and Proclaim(x, stormi) -> Isochronal(stormi))\nforall x (Elder(x) and Isochronal(x) -> not Dictate(x, erastus))\nforall x (Ursine(x) -> not Harmonise(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Elder(x) -> Ursine(x))\nforall x (Harmonise(x, stormi) and Dictate(x, katine) -> Dictate(stormi, erastus))\nforall x (Proclaim(x, erastus) -> Elder(erastus))\nforall x (Doddery(x) and not Isochronal(x) -> Waxy(x))\n\nHarmonise(erastus, cheslie)\n\nProclaim(cheslie, erastus) and forall x (Proclaim(x, erastus) -> Elder(erastus)) -> therefore Elder(erastus) Elder(erastus) and forall x (Elder(x) -> Ursine(x)) -> therefore Ursine(erastus) Ursine(erastus) and forall x (Ursine(x) -> not Harmonise(x, cheslie)) -> therefore not Harmonise(erastus, cheslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The bernardo libel the bettie. The winona does not like the bernardo. The christean is tense. The bettie propagate the winona. If something propagate the bettie then it does not eat the bettie. If something is coiling and it libel the winona then the winona is choragic. If something is peaceful and choragic then it does not like the bettie. If something is coiling then it does not visit the bernardo. If something is peaceful then it is coiling. If something propagate the winona and it caravan the christean then the winona caravan the bettie. If something libel the bettie then the bettie is peaceful. If something is waggish and not choragic then it is tense. The winona is not coiling.", "logic": "\nLibel(bernardo, bettie)\nnot Caravan(winona, bernardo)\nTense(christean)\nPropagate(bettie, winona)\nforall x (Propagate(x, bettie) -> not Libel(x, bettie))\nforall x (Coiling(x) and Libel(x, winona) -> Choragic(winona))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and Choragic(x) -> not Caravan(x, bettie))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> not Propagate(x, bernardo))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Propagate(x, winona) and Caravan(x, christean) -> Caravan(winona, bettie))\nforall x (Libel(x, bettie) -> Peaceful(bettie))\nforall x (Waggish(x) and not Choragic(x) -> Tense(x))\n\nnot Coiling(winona)\n\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Coiling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The kathlin subvert the genevieve. The cookie does not like the kathlin. The louie is disloyal. The genevieve quell the cookie. If something quell the genevieve then it does not eat the genevieve. If something is generic and it subvert the cookie then the cookie is datable. If something is totaled and datable then it does not like the genevieve. If something is generic then it does not visit the kathlin. If something is totaled then it is generic. If something quell the cookie and it nosh the louie then the cookie nosh the genevieve. If something subvert the genevieve then the genevieve is totaled. If something is unthankful and not datable then it is disloyal. The kathlin is disloyal.", "logic": "\nSubvert(kathlin, genevieve)\nnot Nosh(cookie, kathlin)\nDisloyal(louie)\nQuell(genevieve, cookie)\nforall x (Quell(x, genevieve) -> not Subvert(x, genevieve))\nforall x (Generic(x) and Subvert(x, cookie) -> Datable(cookie))\nforall x (Totaled(x) and Datable(x) -> not Nosh(x, genevieve))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> not Quell(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Quell(x, cookie) and Nosh(x, louie) -> Nosh(cookie, genevieve))\nforall x (Subvert(x, genevieve) -> Totaled(genevieve))\nforall x (Unthankful(x) and not Datable(x) -> Disloyal(x))\n\nDisloyal(kathlin)\n\nforall x (Unthankful(x) and not Datable(x) -> Disloyal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The wheeler skimcoat the terrie. The ken does not like the wheeler. The angelia is muddled. The terrie quest the ken. If something quest the terrie then it does not eat the terrie. If something is breezy and it skimcoat the ken then the ken is incident. If something is logy and incident then it does not like the terrie. If something is breezy then it does not visit the wheeler. If something is logy then it is breezy. If something quest the ken and it patrol the angelia then the ken patrol the terrie. If something skimcoat the terrie then the terrie is logy. If something is brumous and not incident then it is muddled. The ken does not like the terrie.", "logic": "\nSkimcoat(wheeler, terrie)\nnot Patrol(ken, wheeler)\nMuddled(angelia)\nQuest(terrie, ken)\nforall x (Quest(x, terrie) -> not Skimcoat(x, terrie))\nforall x (Breezy(x) and Skimcoat(x, ken) -> Incident(ken))\nforall x (Logy(x) and Incident(x) -> not Patrol(x, terrie))\nforall x (Breezy(x) -> not Quest(x, wheeler))\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Breezy(x))\nforall x (Quest(x, ken) and Patrol(x, angelia) -> Patrol(ken, terrie))\nforall x (Skimcoat(x, terrie) -> Logy(terrie))\nforall x (Brumous(x) and not Incident(x) -> Muddled(x))\n\nnot Patrol(ken, terrie)\n\nforall x (Quest(x, ken) and Patrol(x, angelia) -> Patrol(ken, terrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The bessie prosecute the josy. The isahella does not like the bessie. The rem is romany. The josy emigrate the isahella. If something emigrate the josy then it does not eat the josy. If something is unbacked and it prosecute the isahella then the isahella is unwedded. If something is precise and unwedded then it does not like the josy. If something is unbacked then it does not visit the bessie. If something is precise then it is unbacked. If something emigrate the isahella and it bunker the rem then the isahella bunker the josy. If something prosecute the josy then the josy is precise. If something is wheeled and not unwedded then it is romany. The josy is romany.", "logic": "\nProsecute(bessie, josy)\nnot Bunker(isahella, bessie)\nRomany(rem)\nEmigrate(josy, isahella)\nforall x (Emigrate(x, josy) -> not Prosecute(x, josy))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) and Prosecute(x, isahella) -> Unwedded(isahella))\nforall x (Precise(x) and Unwedded(x) -> not Bunker(x, josy))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) -> not Emigrate(x, bessie))\nforall x (Precise(x) -> Unbacked(x))\nforall x (Emigrate(x, isahella) and Bunker(x, rem) -> Bunker(isahella, josy))\nforall x (Prosecute(x, josy) -> Precise(josy))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) and not Unwedded(x) -> Romany(x))\n\nRomany(josy)\n\nforall x (Wheeled(x) and not Unwedded(x) -> Romany(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The jonell dislodge the debee. The joyann does not like the jonell. The shem is censurable. The debee expiate the joyann. If something expiate the debee then it does not eat the debee. If something is spinnbar and it dislodge the joyann then the joyann is legible. If something is aspirant and legible then it does not like the debee. If something is spinnbar then it does not visit the jonell. If something is aspirant then it is spinnbar. If something expiate the joyann and it twang the shem then the joyann twang the debee. If something dislodge the debee then the debee is aspirant. If something is played and not legible then it is censurable. The jonell does not like the jonell.", "logic": "\nDislodge(jonell, debee)\nnot Twang(joyann, jonell)\nCensurable(shem)\nExpiate(debee, joyann)\nforall x (Expiate(x, debee) -> not Dislodge(x, debee))\nforall x (Spinnbar(x) and Dislodge(x, joyann) -> Legible(joyann))\nforall x (Aspirant(x) and Legible(x) -> not Twang(x, debee))\nforall x (Spinnbar(x) -> not Expiate(x, jonell))\nforall x (Aspirant(x) -> Spinnbar(x))\nforall x (Expiate(x, joyann) and Twang(x, shem) -> Twang(joyann, debee))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, debee) -> Aspirant(debee))\nforall x (Played(x) and not Legible(x) -> Censurable(x))\n\nnot Twang(jonell, jonell)\n\nnot Twang(jonell, jonell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The alisa watercolor the ferd. The quillan does not like the alisa. The bernadina is metabolic. The ferd chase the quillan. If something chase the ferd then it does not eat the ferd. If something is siouan and it watercolor the quillan then the quillan is invertible. If something is potbound and invertible then it does not like the ferd. If something is siouan then it does not visit the alisa. If something is potbound then it is siouan. If something chase the quillan and it haze the bernadina then the quillan haze the ferd. If something watercolor the ferd then the ferd is potbound. If something is pied and not invertible then it is metabolic. The alisa chase the ferd.", "logic": "\nWatercolor(alisa, ferd)\nnot Haze(quillan, alisa)\nMetabolic(bernadina)\nChase(ferd, quillan)\nforall x (Chase(x, ferd) -> not Watercolor(x, ferd))\nforall x (Siouan(x) and Watercolor(x, quillan) -> Invertible(quillan))\nforall x (Potbound(x) and Invertible(x) -> not Haze(x, ferd))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> not Chase(x, alisa))\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> Siouan(x))\nforall x (Chase(x, quillan) and Haze(x, bernadina) -> Haze(quillan, ferd))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, ferd) -> Potbound(ferd))\nforall x (Pied(x) and not Invertible(x) -> Metabolic(x))\n\nChase(alisa, ferd)\n\nChase(alisa, ferd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The lianna daze the evie. The carry does not like the lianna. The tibold is walloping. The evie engross the carry. If something engross the evie then it does not eat the evie. If something is inherent and it daze the carry then the carry is robed. If something is blate and robed then it does not like the evie. If something is inherent then it does not visit the lianna. If something is blate then it is inherent. If something engross the carry and it decolorise the tibold then the carry decolorise the evie. If something daze the evie then the evie is blate. If something is sustained and not robed then it is walloping. The carry does not visit the tibold.", "logic": "\nDaze(lianna, evie)\nnot Decolorise(carry, lianna)\nWalloping(tibold)\nEngross(evie, carry)\nforall x (Engross(x, evie) -> not Daze(x, evie))\nforall x (Inherent(x) and Daze(x, carry) -> Robed(carry))\nforall x (Blate(x) and Robed(x) -> not Decolorise(x, evie))\nforall x (Inherent(x) -> not Engross(x, lianna))\nforall x (Blate(x) -> Inherent(x))\nforall x (Engross(x, carry) and Decolorise(x, tibold) -> Decolorise(carry, evie))\nforall x (Daze(x, evie) -> Blate(evie))\nforall x (Sustained(x) and not Robed(x) -> Walloping(x))\n\nnot Engross(carry, tibold)\n\nnot Engross(carry, tibold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The angel oxygenise the georgena. The isaac does not like the angel. The manda is junior. The georgena subvert the isaac. If something subvert the georgena then it does not eat the georgena. If something is orphic and it oxygenise the isaac then the isaac is sloppy. If something is lesbian and sloppy then it does not like the georgena. If something is orphic then it does not visit the angel. If something is lesbian then it is orphic. If something subvert the isaac and it romance the manda then the isaac romance the georgena. If something oxygenise the georgena then the georgena is lesbian. If something is squelched and not sloppy then it is junior. The manda romance the manda.", "logic": "\nOxygenise(angel, georgena)\nnot Romance(isaac, angel)\nJunior(manda)\nSubvert(georgena, isaac)\nforall x (Subvert(x, georgena) -> not Oxygenise(x, georgena))\nforall x (Orphic(x) and Oxygenise(x, isaac) -> Sloppy(isaac))\nforall x (Lesbian(x) and Sloppy(x) -> not Romance(x, georgena))\nforall x (Orphic(x) -> not Subvert(x, angel))\nforall x (Lesbian(x) -> Orphic(x))\nforall x (Subvert(x, isaac) and Romance(x, manda) -> Romance(isaac, georgena))\nforall x (Oxygenise(x, georgena) -> Lesbian(georgena))\nforall x (Squelched(x) and not Sloppy(x) -> Junior(x))\n\nRomance(manda, manda)\n\nRomance(manda, manda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "Euclid is frequent. Euclid is ignitable. Euclid is epiphysial. Euclid is not rootbound. Euclid is exploded. Euclid is viscid. Sylvester is not frequent. Sylvester is ignitable. Sylvester is rootbound. Van is viscid. If something is exploded and not ignitable then it is not fugly. All frequent things are fugly. If something is epiphysial and viscid then it is frequent. If something is viscid then it is epiphysial. Nice things are exploded. If Sylvester is viscid and Sylvester is not exploded then Sylvester is not fugly. Euclid is not rootbound.", "logic": "\nFrequent(euclid)\nIgnitable(euclid)\nEpiphysial(euclid)\nnot Rootbound(euclid)\nExploded(euclid)\nViscid(euclid)\nnot Frequent(sylvester)\nIgnitable(sylvester)\nRootbound(sylvester)\nViscid(van)\nforall x (Exploded(x) and not Ignitable(x) -> not Fugly(x))\nforall x (Frequent(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) and Viscid(x) -> Frequent(x))\nforall x (Viscid(x) -> Epiphysial(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) -> Exploded(x))\nViscid(sylvester) and not Exploded(sylvester) -> not Fugly(sylvester)\n\nnot Rootbound(euclid)\n\ntherefore not Rootbound(euclid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Guinevere is botulinal. Guinevere is beseeching. Guinevere is tunisian. Guinevere is not planted. Guinevere is motivating. Guinevere is leptorhine. Debera is not botulinal. Debera is beseeching. Debera is planted. Hoyt is leptorhine. If something is motivating and not beseeching then it is not dogged. All botulinal things are dogged. If something is tunisian and leptorhine then it is botulinal. If something is leptorhine then it is tunisian. Nice things are motivating. If Debera is leptorhine and Debera is not motivating then Debera is not dogged. Debera is not planted.", "logic": "\nBotulinal(guinevere)\nBeseeching(guinevere)\nTunisian(guinevere)\nnot Planted(guinevere)\nMotivating(guinevere)\nLeptorhine(guinevere)\nnot Botulinal(debera)\nBeseeching(debera)\nPlanted(debera)\nLeptorhine(hoyt)\nforall x (Motivating(x) and not Beseeching(x) -> not Dogged(x))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Dogged(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and Leptorhine(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) -> Tunisian(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> Motivating(x))\nLeptorhine(debera) and not Motivating(debera) -> not Dogged(debera)\n\nnot Planted(debera)\n\ntherefore Planted(debera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Norbert is amyloid. Norbert is releasing. Norbert is glazed. Norbert is not savourless. Norbert is rabbinic. Norbert is dispensed. Randolph is not amyloid. Randolph is releasing. Randolph is savourless. Nadya is dispensed. If something is rabbinic and not releasing then it is not thermoset. All amyloid things are thermoset. If something is glazed and dispensed then it is amyloid. If something is dispensed then it is glazed. Nice things are rabbinic. If Randolph is dispensed and Randolph is not rabbinic then Randolph is not thermoset. Nadya is glazed.", "logic": "\nAmyloid(norbert)\nReleasing(norbert)\nGlazed(norbert)\nnot Savourless(norbert)\nRabbinic(norbert)\nDispensed(norbert)\nnot Amyloid(randolph)\nReleasing(randolph)\nSavourless(randolph)\nDispensed(nadya)\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) and not Releasing(x) -> not Thermoset(x))\nforall x (Amyloid(x) -> Thermoset(x))\nforall x (Glazed(x) and Dispensed(x) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Dispensed(x) -> Glazed(x))\nforall x (Glazed(x) -> Rabbinic(x))\nDispensed(randolph) and not Rabbinic(randolph) -> not Thermoset(randolph)\n\nGlazed(nadya)\n\nDispensed(nadya) and forall x (Dispensed(x) -> Glazed(x)) -> therefore Glazed(nadya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Steward is bitter. Steward is yearly. Steward is frothy. Steward is not oily. Steward is tamable. Steward is flemish. Aline is not bitter. Aline is yearly. Aline is oily. Renard is flemish. If something is tamable and not yearly then it is not chirpy. All bitter things are chirpy. If something is frothy and flemish then it is bitter. If something is flemish then it is frothy. Nice things are tamable. If Aline is flemish and Aline is not tamable then Aline is not chirpy. Renard is not frothy.", "logic": "\nBitter(steward)\nYearly(steward)\nFrothy(steward)\nnot Oily(steward)\nTamable(steward)\nFlemish(steward)\nnot Bitter(aline)\nYearly(aline)\nOily(aline)\nFlemish(renard)\nforall x (Tamable(x) and not Yearly(x) -> not Chirpy(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Chirpy(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) and Flemish(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Flemish(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) -> Tamable(x))\nFlemish(aline) and not Tamable(aline) -> not Chirpy(aline)\n\nnot Frothy(renard)\n\nFlemish(renard) and forall x (Flemish(x) -> Frothy(x)) -> therefore Frothy(renard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Darryl is pale. Darryl is mortuary. Darryl is ternary. Darryl is not languid. Darryl is remedial. Darryl is snuggled. Rubie is not pale. Rubie is mortuary. Rubie is languid. Theresita is snuggled. If something is remedial and not mortuary then it is not affixal. All pale things are affixal. If something is ternary and snuggled then it is pale. If something is snuggled then it is ternary. Nice things are remedial. If Rubie is snuggled and Rubie is not remedial then Rubie is not affixal. Theresita is pale.", "logic": "\nPale(darryl)\nMortuary(darryl)\nTernary(darryl)\nnot Languid(darryl)\nRemedial(darryl)\nSnuggled(darryl)\nnot Pale(rubie)\nMortuary(rubie)\nLanguid(rubie)\nSnuggled(theresita)\nforall x (Remedial(x) and not Mortuary(x) -> not Affixal(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) -> Affixal(x))\nforall x (Ternary(x) and Snuggled(x) -> Pale(x))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> Ternary(x))\nforall x (Ternary(x) -> Remedial(x))\nSnuggled(rubie) and not Remedial(rubie) -> not Affixal(rubie)\n\nPale(theresita)\n\nSnuggled(theresita) and forall x (Snuggled(x) -> Ternary(x)) -> therefore Ternary(theresita) Ternary(theresita) and Snuggled(theresita) and forall x (Ternary(x) and Snuggled(x) -> Pale(x)) -> therefore Pale(theresita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Estell is acyclic. Estell is surmisable. Estell is deadly. Estell is not earthbound. Estell is classical. Estell is tearful. Adey is not acyclic. Adey is surmisable. Adey is earthbound. Ari is tearful. If something is classical and not surmisable then it is not tumid. All acyclic things are tumid. If something is deadly and tearful then it is acyclic. If something is tearful then it is deadly. Nice things are classical. If Adey is tearful and Adey is not classical then Adey is not tumid. Ari is not classical.", "logic": "\nAcyclic(estell)\nSurmisable(estell)\nDeadly(estell)\nnot Earthbound(estell)\nClassical(estell)\nTearful(estell)\nnot Acyclic(adey)\nSurmisable(adey)\nEarthbound(adey)\nTearful(ari)\nforall x (Classical(x) and not Surmisable(x) -> not Tumid(x))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) -> Tumid(x))\nforall x (Deadly(x) and Tearful(x) -> Acyclic(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) -> Deadly(x))\nforall x (Deadly(x) -> Classical(x))\nTearful(adey) and not Classical(adey) -> not Tumid(adey)\n\nnot Classical(ari)\n\nTearful(ari) and forall x (Tearful(x) -> Deadly(x)) -> therefore Deadly(ari) Deadly(ari) and forall x (Deadly(x) -> Classical(x)) -> therefore Classical(ari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Rosene is raucous. Rosene is clausal. Rosene is civilian. Rosene is not tattling. Rosene is ampullar. Rosene is embryonal. Lind is not raucous. Lind is clausal. Lind is tattling. Cleopatra is embryonal. If something is ampullar and not clausal then it is not mucinoid. All raucous things are mucinoid. If something is civilian and embryonal then it is raucous. If something is embryonal then it is civilian. Nice things are ampullar. If Lind is embryonal and Lind is not ampullar then Lind is not mucinoid. Cleopatra is mucinoid.", "logic": "\nRaucous(rosene)\nClausal(rosene)\nCivilian(rosene)\nnot Tattling(rosene)\nAmpullar(rosene)\nEmbryonal(rosene)\nnot Raucous(lind)\nClausal(lind)\nTattling(lind)\nEmbryonal(cleopatra)\nforall x (Ampullar(x) and not Clausal(x) -> not Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) and Embryonal(x) -> Raucous(x))\nforall x (Embryonal(x) -> Civilian(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Ampullar(x))\nEmbryonal(lind) and not Ampullar(lind) -> not Mucinoid(lind)\n\nMucinoid(cleopatra)\n\nEmbryonal(cleopatra) and forall x (Embryonal(x) -> Civilian(x)) -> therefore Civilian(cleopatra) Civilian(cleopatra) and Embryonal(cleopatra) and forall x (Civilian(x) and Embryonal(x) -> Raucous(x)) -> therefore Raucous(cleopatra) Raucous(cleopatra) and forall x (Raucous(x) -> Mucinoid(x)) -> therefore Mucinoid(cleopatra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Rosalinde is unclad. Rosalinde is sedgelike. Rosalinde is arborous. Rosalinde is not okay. Rosalinde is glace. Rosalinde is extensive. Tobin is not unclad. Tobin is sedgelike. Tobin is okay. Babita is extensive. If something is glace and not sedgelike then it is not tibetan. All unclad things are tibetan. If something is arborous and extensive then it is unclad. If something is extensive then it is arborous. Nice things are glace. If Tobin is extensive and Tobin is not glace then Tobin is not tibetan. Babita is not tibetan.", "logic": "\nUnclad(rosalinde)\nSedgelike(rosalinde)\nArborous(rosalinde)\nnot Okay(rosalinde)\nGlace(rosalinde)\nExtensive(rosalinde)\nnot Unclad(tobin)\nSedgelike(tobin)\nOkay(tobin)\nExtensive(babita)\nforall x (Glace(x) and not Sedgelike(x) -> not Tibetan(x))\nforall x (Unclad(x) -> Tibetan(x))\nforall x (Arborous(x) and Extensive(x) -> Unclad(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Arborous(x))\nforall x (Arborous(x) -> Glace(x))\nExtensive(tobin) and not Glace(tobin) -> not Tibetan(tobin)\n\nnot Tibetan(babita)\n\nExtensive(babita) and forall x (Extensive(x) -> Arborous(x)) -> therefore Arborous(babita) Arborous(babita) and Extensive(babita) and forall x (Arborous(x) and Extensive(x) -> Unclad(x)) -> therefore Unclad(babita) Unclad(babita) and forall x (Unclad(x) -> Tibetan(x)) -> therefore Tibetan(babita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Shelley is branchial. Shelley is cynical. Shelley is boronic. Shelley is not fulgurous. Shelley is annular. Shelley is diatomic. Denyse is not branchial. Denyse is cynical. Denyse is fulgurous. Cherry is diatomic. If something is annular and not cynical then it is not stabile. All branchial things are stabile. If something is boronic and diatomic then it is branchial. If something is diatomic then it is boronic. Nice things are annular. If Denyse is diatomic and Denyse is not annular then Denyse is not stabile. Denyse is not boronic.", "logic": "\nBranchial(shelley)\nCynical(shelley)\nBoronic(shelley)\nnot Fulgurous(shelley)\nAnnular(shelley)\nDiatomic(shelley)\nnot Branchial(denyse)\nCynical(denyse)\nFulgurous(denyse)\nDiatomic(cherry)\nforall x (Annular(x) and not Cynical(x) -> not Stabile(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) -> Stabile(x))\nforall x (Boronic(x) and Diatomic(x) -> Branchial(x))\nforall x (Diatomic(x) -> Boronic(x))\nforall x (Boronic(x) -> Annular(x))\nDiatomic(denyse) and not Annular(denyse) -> not Stabile(denyse)\n\nnot Boronic(denyse)\n\nforall x (Diatomic(x) -> Boronic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Tina is subacute. Tina is xciii. Tina is silver. Tina is not dendritic. Tina is befouled. Tina is callable. Jody is not subacute. Jody is xciii. Jody is dendritic. Gav is callable. If something is befouled and not xciii then it is not comparable. All subacute things are comparable. If something is silver and callable then it is subacute. If something is callable then it is silver. Nice things are befouled. If Jody is callable and Jody is not befouled then Jody is not comparable. Jody is comparable.", "logic": "\nSubacute(tina)\nXciii(tina)\nSilver(tina)\nnot Dendritic(tina)\nBefouled(tina)\nCallable(tina)\nnot Subacute(jody)\nXciii(jody)\nDendritic(jody)\nCallable(gav)\nforall x (Befouled(x) and not Xciii(x) -> not Comparable(x))\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Comparable(x))\nforall x (Silver(x) and Callable(x) -> Subacute(x))\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Silver(x))\nforall x (Silver(x) -> Befouled(x))\nCallable(jody) and not Befouled(jody) -> not Comparable(jody)\n\nComparable(jody)\n\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Comparable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Kaila is setaceous. Kaila is violated. Kaila is hostile. Kaila is not macerative. Kaila is hoggish. Kaila is hypnogogic. Jada is not setaceous. Jada is violated. Jada is macerative. Chantal is hypnogogic. If something is hoggish and not violated then it is not ectopic. All setaceous things are ectopic. If something is hostile and hypnogogic then it is setaceous. If something is hypnogogic then it is hostile. Nice things are hoggish. If Jada is hypnogogic and Jada is not hoggish then Jada is not ectopic. Jada is not hoggish.", "logic": "\nSetaceous(kaila)\nViolated(kaila)\nHostile(kaila)\nnot Macerative(kaila)\nHoggish(kaila)\nHypnogogic(kaila)\nnot Setaceous(jada)\nViolated(jada)\nMacerative(jada)\nHypnogogic(chantal)\nforall x (Hoggish(x) and not Violated(x) -> not Ectopic(x))\nforall x (Setaceous(x) -> Ectopic(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) and Hypnogogic(x) -> Setaceous(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Hoggish(x))\nHypnogogic(jada) and not Hoggish(jada) -> not Ectopic(jada)\n\nnot Hoggish(jada)\n\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Hoggish(x)) <- forall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Hostile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Taber is fitted. Taber is concise. Taber is overladen. Taber is not thunderous. Taber is maplelike. Taber is unpeaceful. Felicdad is not fitted. Felicdad is concise. Felicdad is thunderous. Olimpia is unpeaceful. If something is maplelike and not concise then it is not retractile. All fitted things are retractile. If something is overladen and unpeaceful then it is fitted. If something is unpeaceful then it is overladen. Nice things are maplelike. If Felicdad is unpeaceful and Felicdad is not maplelike then Felicdad is not retractile. Felicdad is unpeaceful.", "logic": "\nFitted(taber)\nConcise(taber)\nOverladen(taber)\nnot Thunderous(taber)\nMaplelike(taber)\nUnpeaceful(taber)\nnot Fitted(felicdad)\nConcise(felicdad)\nThunderous(felicdad)\nUnpeaceful(olimpia)\nforall x (Maplelike(x) and not Concise(x) -> not Retractile(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Retractile(x))\nforall x (Overladen(x) and Unpeaceful(x) -> Fitted(x))\nforall x (Unpeaceful(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Overladen(x) -> Maplelike(x))\nUnpeaceful(felicdad) and not Maplelike(felicdad) -> not Retractile(felicdad)\n\nUnpeaceful(felicdad)\n\nUnpeaceful(felicdad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Ariela is negligent. Ariela is impelled. Ariela is meaning. Ariela is not chylous. Ariela is notched. Ariela is tasteful. Lorilyn is not negligent. Lorilyn is impelled. Lorilyn is chylous. Vin is tasteful. If something is notched and not impelled then it is not observed. All negligent things are observed. If something is meaning and tasteful then it is negligent. If something is tasteful then it is meaning. Nice things are notched. If Lorilyn is tasteful and Lorilyn is not notched then Lorilyn is not observed. Vin is not chylous.", "logic": "\nNegligent(ariela)\nImpelled(ariela)\nMeaning(ariela)\nnot Chylous(ariela)\nNotched(ariela)\nTasteful(ariela)\nnot Negligent(lorilyn)\nImpelled(lorilyn)\nChylous(lorilyn)\nTasteful(vin)\nforall x (Notched(x) and not Impelled(x) -> not Observed(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Observed(x))\nforall x (Meaning(x) and Tasteful(x) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Tasteful(x) -> Meaning(x))\nforall x (Meaning(x) -> Notched(x))\nTasteful(lorilyn) and not Notched(lorilyn) -> not Observed(lorilyn)\n\nnot Chylous(vin)\n\nnot Chylous(vin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Ramona is esthetic. Ramona is adjacent. Ramona is bourgeois. Ramona is not amniotic. Ramona is primary. Ramona is aegean. Chet is not esthetic. Chet is adjacent. Chet is amniotic. Sidnee is aegean. If something is primary and not adjacent then it is not incredible. All esthetic things are incredible. If something is bourgeois and aegean then it is esthetic. If something is aegean then it is bourgeois. Nice things are primary. If Chet is aegean and Chet is not primary then Chet is not incredible. Sidnee is adjacent.", "logic": "\nEsthetic(ramona)\nAdjacent(ramona)\nBourgeois(ramona)\nnot Amniotic(ramona)\nPrimary(ramona)\nAegean(ramona)\nnot Esthetic(chet)\nAdjacent(chet)\nAmniotic(chet)\nAegean(sidnee)\nforall x (Primary(x) and not Adjacent(x) -> not Incredible(x))\nforall x (Esthetic(x) -> Incredible(x))\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) and Aegean(x) -> Esthetic(x))\nforall x (Aegean(x) -> Bourgeois(x))\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) -> Primary(x))\nAegean(chet) and not Primary(chet) -> not Incredible(chet)\n\nAdjacent(sidnee)\n\nAdjacent(sidnee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Veronika is requested. Veronika is unplaced. Veronika is practiced. Hollyanne is singsong. Hollyanne is unwary. Hollyanne is requested. Hollyanne is unplaced. Hollyanne is practiced. Giffer is unwary. Giffer is unplaced. Green, practiced things are cloze. All cavernous things are singsong. If something is unplaced then it is cavernous. Hollyanne is requested.", "logic": "\nRequested(veronika)\nUnplaced(veronika)\nPracticed(veronika)\nSingsong(hollyanne)\nUnwary(hollyanne)\nRequested(hollyanne)\nUnplaced(hollyanne)\nPracticed(hollyanne)\nUnwary(giffer)\nUnplaced(giffer)\nforall x (Singsong(x) and Practiced(x) -> Cloze(x))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) -> Singsong(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Cavernous(x))\n\nRequested(hollyanne)\n\ntherefore Requested(hollyanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Madelyn is contiguous. Madelyn is dividable. Madelyn is heartfelt. Kingsley is public. Kingsley is omnibus. Kingsley is contiguous. Kingsley is dividable. Kingsley is heartfelt. Dimitris is omnibus. Dimitris is dividable. Green, heartfelt things are caddish. All plutonian things are public. If something is dividable then it is plutonian. Madelyn is not contiguous.", "logic": "\nContiguous(madelyn)\nDividable(madelyn)\nHeartfelt(madelyn)\nPublic(kingsley)\nOmnibus(kingsley)\nContiguous(kingsley)\nDividable(kingsley)\nHeartfelt(kingsley)\nOmnibus(dimitris)\nDividable(dimitris)\nforall x (Public(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Plutonian(x) -> Public(x))\nforall x (Dividable(x) -> Plutonian(x))\n\nnot Contiguous(madelyn)\n\ntherefore Contiguous(madelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Terrance is widowed. Terrance is spinous. Terrance is sectioned. Avrit is drunk. Avrit is cataclinal. Avrit is widowed. Avrit is spinous. Avrit is sectioned. Adriaens is cataclinal. Adriaens is spinous. Green, sectioned things are isosmotic. All slumbrous things are drunk. If something is spinous then it is slumbrous. Avrit is isosmotic.", "logic": "\nWidowed(terrance)\nSpinous(terrance)\nSectioned(terrance)\nDrunk(avrit)\nCataclinal(avrit)\nWidowed(avrit)\nSpinous(avrit)\nSectioned(avrit)\nCataclinal(adriaens)\nSpinous(adriaens)\nforall x (Drunk(x) and Sectioned(x) -> Isosmotic(x))\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) -> Drunk(x))\nforall x (Spinous(x) -> Slumbrous(x))\n\nIsosmotic(avrit)\n\nDrunk(avrit) and Sectioned(avrit) and forall x (Drunk(x) and Sectioned(x) -> Isosmotic(x)) -> therefore Isosmotic(avrit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Lindsay is trying. Lindsay is devoted. Lindsay is weathered. Sammie is medium. Sammie is aramean. Sammie is trying. Sammie is devoted. Sammie is weathered. Ameline is aramean. Ameline is devoted. Green, weathered things are pandemic. All staid things are medium. If something is devoted then it is staid. Ameline is not staid.", "logic": "\nTrying(lindsay)\nDevoted(lindsay)\nWeathered(lindsay)\nMedium(sammie)\nAramean(sammie)\nTrying(sammie)\nDevoted(sammie)\nWeathered(sammie)\nAramean(ameline)\nDevoted(ameline)\nforall x (Medium(x) and Weathered(x) -> Pandemic(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Staid(x))\n\nnot Staid(ameline)\n\nDevoted(ameline) and forall x (Devoted(x) -> Staid(x)) -> therefore Staid(ameline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Hermann is eldritch. Hermann is mycenaean. Hermann is noted. Tara is noble. Tara is polyglot. Tara is eldritch. Tara is mycenaean. Tara is noted. Chas is polyglot. Chas is mycenaean. Green, noted things are thrillful. All magenta things are noble. If something is mycenaean then it is magenta. Chas is noble.", "logic": "\nEldritch(hermann)\nMycenaean(hermann)\nNoted(hermann)\nNoble(tara)\nPolyglot(tara)\nEldritch(tara)\nMycenaean(tara)\nNoted(tara)\nPolyglot(chas)\nMycenaean(chas)\nforall x (Noble(x) and Noted(x) -> Thrillful(x))\nforall x (Magenta(x) -> Noble(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Magenta(x))\n\nNoble(chas)\n\nMycenaean(chas) and forall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Magenta(x)) -> therefore Magenta(chas) Magenta(chas) and forall x (Magenta(x) -> Noble(x)) -> therefore Noble(chas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Fanny is missing. Fanny is auditive. Fanny is lusitanian. Ellette is footsure. Ellette is squashed. Ellette is missing. Ellette is auditive. Ellette is lusitanian. Jeth is squashed. Jeth is auditive. Green, lusitanian things are bristled. All unaged things are footsure. If something is auditive then it is unaged. Jeth is not footsure.", "logic": "\nMissing(fanny)\nAuditive(fanny)\nLusitanian(fanny)\nFootsure(ellette)\nSquashed(ellette)\nMissing(ellette)\nAuditive(ellette)\nLusitanian(ellette)\nSquashed(jeth)\nAuditive(jeth)\nforall x (Footsure(x) and Lusitanian(x) -> Bristled(x))\nforall x (Unaged(x) -> Footsure(x))\nforall x (Auditive(x) -> Unaged(x))\n\nnot Footsure(jeth)\n\nAuditive(jeth) and forall x (Auditive(x) -> Unaged(x)) -> therefore Unaged(jeth) Unaged(jeth) and forall x (Unaged(x) -> Footsure(x)) -> therefore Footsure(jeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Flori is waxen. Flori is adulterous. Flori is apolitical. Berry is faineant. Berry is chicken. Berry is waxen. Berry is adulterous. Berry is apolitical. Anatol is chicken. Anatol is adulterous. Green, apolitical things are incised. All pronominal things are faineant. If something is adulterous then it is pronominal. Flori is incised.", "logic": "\nWaxen(flori)\nAdulterous(flori)\nApolitical(flori)\nFaineant(berry)\nChicken(berry)\nWaxen(berry)\nAdulterous(berry)\nApolitical(berry)\nChicken(anatol)\nAdulterous(anatol)\nforall x (Faineant(x) and Apolitical(x) -> Incised(x))\nforall x (Pronominal(x) -> Faineant(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) -> Pronominal(x))\n\nIncised(flori)\n\nAdulterous(flori) and forall x (Adulterous(x) -> Pronominal(x)) -> therefore Pronominal(flori) Pronominal(flori) and forall x (Pronominal(x) -> Faineant(x)) -> therefore Faineant(flori) Faineant(flori) and Apolitical(flori) and forall x (Faineant(x) and Apolitical(x) -> Incised(x)) -> therefore Incised(flori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Abram is loath. Abram is voiceless. Abram is ptolemaic. Franklin is confounded. Franklin is unmourned. Franklin is loath. Franklin is voiceless. Franklin is ptolemaic. Bradford is unmourned. Bradford is voiceless. Green, ptolemaic things are able. All cationic things are confounded. If something is voiceless then it is cationic. Abram is not able.", "logic": "\nLoath(abram)\nVoiceless(abram)\nPtolemaic(abram)\nConfounded(franklin)\nUnmourned(franklin)\nLoath(franklin)\nVoiceless(franklin)\nPtolemaic(franklin)\nUnmourned(bradford)\nVoiceless(bradford)\nforall x (Confounded(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) -> Confounded(x))\nforall x (Voiceless(x) -> Cationic(x))\n\nnot Able(abram)\n\nVoiceless(abram) and forall x (Voiceless(x) -> Cationic(x)) -> therefore Cationic(abram) Cationic(abram) and forall x (Cationic(x) -> Confounded(x)) -> therefore Confounded(abram) Confounded(abram) and Ptolemaic(abram) and forall x (Confounded(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Able(x)) -> therefore Able(abram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Arvind is ectozoan. Arvind is limacoid. Arvind is earnest. Sarena is coaxal. Sarena is mantled. Sarena is ectozoan. Sarena is limacoid. Sarena is earnest. Marius is mantled. Marius is limacoid. Green, earnest things are eyeless. All saved things are coaxal. If something is limacoid then it is saved. Marius is not eyeless.", "logic": "\nEctozoan(arvind)\nLimacoid(arvind)\nEarnest(arvind)\nCoaxal(sarena)\nMantled(sarena)\nEctozoan(sarena)\nLimacoid(sarena)\nEarnest(sarena)\nMantled(marius)\nLimacoid(marius)\nforall x (Coaxal(x) and Earnest(x) -> Eyeless(x))\nforall x (Saved(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) -> Saved(x))\n\nnot Eyeless(marius)\n\nforall x (Coaxal(x) and Earnest(x) -> Eyeless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Sybille is quality. Sybille is topping. Sybille is draconian. Cassandre is resident. Cassandre is bacchic. Cassandre is quality. Cassandre is topping. Cassandre is draconian. Clotilda is bacchic. Clotilda is topping. Green, draconian things are sugarless. All ringlike things are resident. If something is topping then it is ringlike. Clotilda is draconian.", "logic": "\nQuality(sybille)\nTopping(sybille)\nDraconian(sybille)\nResident(cassandre)\nBacchic(cassandre)\nQuality(cassandre)\nTopping(cassandre)\nDraconian(cassandre)\nBacchic(clotilda)\nTopping(clotilda)\nforall x (Resident(x) and Draconian(x) -> Sugarless(x))\nforall x (Ringlike(x) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Topping(x) -> Ringlike(x))\n\nDraconian(clotilda)\n\nDraconian(clotilda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Arden is syntactic. Arden is wispy. Arden is pernicious. Jeremy is meaning. Jeremy is methodist. Jeremy is syntactic. Jeremy is wispy. Jeremy is pernicious. Nikki is methodist. Nikki is wispy. Green, pernicious things are hearing. All acidic things are meaning. If something is wispy then it is acidic. Nikki is not syntactic.", "logic": "\nSyntactic(arden)\nWispy(arden)\nPernicious(arden)\nMeaning(jeremy)\nMethodist(jeremy)\nSyntactic(jeremy)\nWispy(jeremy)\nPernicious(jeremy)\nMethodist(nikki)\nWispy(nikki)\nforall x (Meaning(x) and Pernicious(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Meaning(x))\nforall x (Wispy(x) -> Acidic(x))\n\nnot Syntactic(nikki)\n\nnot Syntactic(nikki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Laurel is shaken. Laurel is classic. Laurel is ducal. Antony is falconine. Antony is bilinear. Antony is shaken. Antony is classic. Antony is ducal. Rana is bilinear. Rana is classic. Green, ducal things are ciliate. All adoptive things are falconine. If something is classic then it is adoptive. Laurel is bilinear.", "logic": "\nShaken(laurel)\nClassic(laurel)\nDucal(laurel)\nFalconine(antony)\nBilinear(antony)\nShaken(antony)\nClassic(antony)\nDucal(antony)\nBilinear(rana)\nClassic(rana)\nforall x (Falconine(x) and Ducal(x) -> Ciliate(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Classic(x) -> Adoptive(x))\n\nBilinear(laurel)\n\nBilinear(laurel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Edgar is neandertal. Edgar is straggly. Donnie is straggly. Smart, straggly things are roily. Green, neandertal things are fulgid. If something is subdural and not neandertal then it is fulgid. Kind things are subdural. If something is roily then it is intrinsic. All fulgid things are intrinsic. All dilatory, roily things are straggly. If Edgar is neandertal then Edgar is roily. Edgar is straggly.", "logic": "\nNeandertal(edgar)\nStraggly(edgar)\nStraggly(donnie)\nforall x (Neandertal(x) and Straggly(x) -> Roily(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) and Neandertal(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nforall x (Subdural(x) and not Neandertal(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) and Roily(x) -> Straggly(x))\nNeandertal(edgar) -> Roily(edgar)\n\nStraggly(edgar)\n\ntherefore Straggly(edgar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Esmeralda is dolabrate. Esmeralda is mousey. Kaari is mousey. Smart, mousey things are limacine. Green, dolabrate things are spanish. If something is sluggish and not dolabrate then it is spanish. Kind things are sluggish. If something is limacine then it is ariose. All spanish things are ariose. All dodgy, limacine things are mousey. If Esmeralda is dolabrate then Esmeralda is limacine. Kaari is not mousey.", "logic": "\nDolabrate(esmeralda)\nMousey(esmeralda)\nMousey(kaari)\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) and Mousey(x) -> Limacine(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Dolabrate(x) -> Spanish(x))\nforall x (Sluggish(x) and not Dolabrate(x) -> Spanish(x))\nforall x (Ariose(x) -> Sluggish(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) -> Ariose(x))\nforall x (Spanish(x) -> Ariose(x))\nforall x (Dodgy(x) and Limacine(x) -> Mousey(x))\nDolabrate(esmeralda) -> Limacine(esmeralda)\n\nnot Mousey(kaari)\n\ntherefore Mousey(kaari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Bobbie is foppish. Bobbie is silty. Luciana is silty. Smart, silty things are unattired. Green, foppish things are sagittal. If something is repellent and not foppish then it is sagittal. Kind things are repellent. If something is unattired then it is endocrine. All sagittal things are endocrine. All idealized, unattired things are silty. If Bobbie is foppish then Bobbie is unattired. Bobbie is unattired.", "logic": "\nFoppish(bobbie)\nSilty(bobbie)\nSilty(luciana)\nforall x (Foppish(x) and Silty(x) -> Unattired(x))\nforall x (Unattired(x) and Foppish(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nforall x (Repellent(x) and not Foppish(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nforall x (Endocrine(x) -> Repellent(x))\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Sagittal(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Idealized(x) and Unattired(x) -> Silty(x))\nFoppish(bobbie) -> Unattired(bobbie)\n\nUnattired(bobbie)\n\nFoppish(bobbie) and Foppish(bobbie) -> Unattired(bobbie) -> therefore Unattired(bobbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Ronald is rolled. Ronald is such. Emelia is such. Smart, such things are florentine. Green, rolled things are mishnaic. If something is jilted and not rolled then it is mishnaic. Kind things are jilted. If something is florentine then it is queer. All mishnaic things are queer. All unsatiable, florentine things are such. If Ronald is rolled then Ronald is florentine. Ronald is not florentine.", "logic": "\nRolled(ronald)\nSuch(ronald)\nSuch(emelia)\nforall x (Rolled(x) and Such(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Rolled(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Jilted(x) and not Rolled(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Queer(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Florentine(x) -> Queer(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Queer(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) and Florentine(x) -> Such(x))\nRolled(ronald) -> Florentine(ronald)\n\nnot Florentine(ronald)\n\nRolled(ronald) and Rolled(ronald) -> Florentine(ronald) -> therefore Florentine(ronald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Arielle is breakneck. Arielle is whatever. Derick is whatever. Smart, whatever things are unprompted. Green, breakneck things are consecrate. If something is caecal and not breakneck then it is consecrate. Kind things are caecal. If something is unprompted then it is agrarian. All consecrate things are agrarian. All nasty, unprompted things are whatever. If Arielle is breakneck then Arielle is unprompted. Arielle is agrarian.", "logic": "\nBreakneck(arielle)\nWhatever(arielle)\nWhatever(derick)\nforall x (Breakneck(x) and Whatever(x) -> Unprompted(x))\nforall x (Unprompted(x) and Breakneck(x) -> Consecrate(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) and not Breakneck(x) -> Consecrate(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Unprompted(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Consecrate(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Nasty(x) and Unprompted(x) -> Whatever(x))\nBreakneck(arielle) -> Unprompted(arielle)\n\nAgrarian(arielle)\n\nBreakneck(arielle) and Breakneck(arielle) -> Unprompted(arielle) -> therefore Unprompted(arielle) Unprompted(arielle) and forall x (Unprompted(x) -> Agrarian(x)) -> therefore Agrarian(arielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Meredith is allargando. Meredith is miserly. Kristian is miserly. Smart, miserly things are articled. Green, allargando things are lifted. If something is unsheared and not allargando then it is lifted. Kind things are unsheared. If something is articled then it is vested. All lifted things are vested. All ignitible, articled things are miserly. If Meredith is allargando then Meredith is articled. Meredith is not vested.", "logic": "\nAllargando(meredith)\nMiserly(meredith)\nMiserly(kristian)\nforall x (Allargando(x) and Miserly(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) and Allargando(x) -> Lifted(x))\nforall x (Unsheared(x) and not Allargando(x) -> Lifted(x))\nforall x (Vested(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Vested(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) -> Vested(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Articled(x) -> Miserly(x))\nAllargando(meredith) -> Articled(meredith)\n\nnot Vested(meredith)\n\nAllargando(meredith) and Allargando(meredith) -> Articled(meredith) -> therefore Articled(meredith) Articled(meredith) and forall x (Articled(x) -> Vested(x)) -> therefore Vested(meredith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Jaymee is unplayful. Jaymee is aired. Sibylle is aired. Smart, aired things are surd. Green, unplayful things are nipponese. If something is budgetary and not unplayful then it is nipponese. Kind things are budgetary. If something is surd then it is discalced. All nipponese things are discalced. All hurrying, surd things are aired. If Jaymee is unplayful then Jaymee is surd. Jaymee is budgetary.", "logic": "\nUnplayful(jaymee)\nAired(jaymee)\nAired(sibylle)\nforall x (Unplayful(x) and Aired(x) -> Surd(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) and Unplayful(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Budgetary(x) and not Unplayful(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Discalced(x) -> Budgetary(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Nipponese(x) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) and Surd(x) -> Aired(x))\nUnplayful(jaymee) -> Surd(jaymee)\n\nBudgetary(jaymee)\n\nUnplayful(jaymee) and Unplayful(jaymee) -> Surd(jaymee) -> therefore Surd(jaymee) Surd(jaymee) and forall x (Surd(x) -> Discalced(x)) -> therefore Discalced(jaymee) Discalced(jaymee) and forall x (Discalced(x) -> Budgetary(x)) -> therefore Budgetary(jaymee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Rosaleen is monoclonal. Rosaleen is unread. Enya is unread. Smart, unread things are atlantic. Green, monoclonal things are hardy. If something is jesuitical and not monoclonal then it is hardy. Kind things are jesuitical. If something is atlantic then it is bilabiate. All hardy things are bilabiate. All assertable, atlantic things are unread. If Rosaleen is monoclonal then Rosaleen is atlantic. Rosaleen is not jesuitical.", "logic": "\nMonoclonal(rosaleen)\nUnread(rosaleen)\nUnread(enya)\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and Unread(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) and Monoclonal(x) -> Hardy(x))\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) and not Monoclonal(x) -> Hardy(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) and Atlantic(x) -> Unread(x))\nMonoclonal(rosaleen) -> Atlantic(rosaleen)\n\nnot Jesuitical(rosaleen)\n\nMonoclonal(rosaleen) and Monoclonal(rosaleen) -> Atlantic(rosaleen) -> therefore Atlantic(rosaleen) Atlantic(rosaleen) and forall x (Atlantic(x) -> Bilabiate(x)) -> therefore Bilabiate(rosaleen) Bilabiate(rosaleen) and forall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Jesuitical(x)) -> therefore Jesuitical(rosaleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Bernita is subtropic. Bernita is treeless. Darrin is treeless. Smart, treeless things are plumbable. Green, subtropic things are abranchial. If something is thermionic and not subtropic then it is abranchial. Kind things are thermionic. If something is plumbable then it is monarchal. All abranchial things are monarchal. All glandular, plumbable things are treeless. If Bernita is subtropic then Bernita is plumbable. Darrin is not thermionic.", "logic": "\nSubtropic(bernita)\nTreeless(bernita)\nTreeless(darrin)\nforall x (Subtropic(x) and Treeless(x) -> Plumbable(x))\nforall x (Plumbable(x) and Subtropic(x) -> Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) and not Subtropic(x) -> Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) -> Thermionic(x))\nforall x (Plumbable(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Glandular(x) and Plumbable(x) -> Treeless(x))\nSubtropic(bernita) -> Plumbable(bernita)\n\nnot Thermionic(darrin)\n\nforall x (Monarchal(x) -> Thermionic(x)) <- forall x (Plumbable(x) -> Monarchal(x)) <- forall x (Subtropic(x) and Treeless(x) -> Plumbable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Robert is cheating. Robert is yokelish. Ingaberg is yokelish. Smart, yokelish things are fourscore. Green, cheating things are swimming. If something is untipped and not cheating then it is swimming. Kind things are untipped. If something is fourscore then it is resistless. All swimming things are resistless. All scarred, fourscore things are yokelish. If Robert is cheating then Robert is fourscore. Ingaberg is fourscore.", "logic": "\nCheating(robert)\nYokelish(robert)\nYokelish(ingaberg)\nforall x (Cheating(x) and Yokelish(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Cheating(x) -> Swimming(x))\nforall x (Untipped(x) and not Cheating(x) -> Swimming(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> Untipped(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Swimming(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Scarred(x) and Fourscore(x) -> Yokelish(x))\nCheating(robert) -> Fourscore(robert)\n\nFourscore(ingaberg)\n\nforall x (Cheating(x) and Yokelish(x) -> Fourscore(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Annice is hindustani. Annice is poriferous. Essy is poriferous. Smart, poriferous things are exorbitant. Green, hindustani things are noiseless. If something is validating and not hindustani then it is noiseless. Kind things are validating. If something is exorbitant then it is pentatonic. All noiseless things are pentatonic. All unnerved, exorbitant things are poriferous. If Annice is hindustani then Annice is exorbitant. Essy is not noiseless.", "logic": "\nHindustani(annice)\nPoriferous(annice)\nPoriferous(essy)\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Poriferous(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) and Hindustani(x) -> Noiseless(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) and not Hindustani(x) -> Noiseless(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Validating(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Noiseless(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Unnerved(x) and Exorbitant(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nHindustani(annice) -> Exorbitant(annice)\n\nnot Noiseless(essy)\n\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) and Hindustani(x) -> Noiseless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Keefe is chambered. Keefe is center. Blinni is center. Smart, center things are infantile. Green, chambered things are unimagined. If something is hypnoid and not chambered then it is unimagined. Kind things are hypnoid. If something is infantile then it is occupied. All unimagined things are occupied. All danish, infantile things are center. If Keefe is chambered then Keefe is infantile. Blinni is occupied.", "logic": "\nChambered(keefe)\nCenter(keefe)\nCenter(blinni)\nforall x (Chambered(x) and Center(x) -> Infantile(x))\nforall x (Infantile(x) and Chambered(x) -> Unimagined(x))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and not Chambered(x) -> Unimagined(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Hypnoid(x))\nforall x (Infantile(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Unimagined(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Danish(x) and Infantile(x) -> Center(x))\nChambered(keefe) -> Infantile(keefe)\n\nOccupied(blinni)\n\nforall x (Infantile(x) -> Occupied(x)) <- forall x (Chambered(x) and Center(x) -> Infantile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Lyndell is timeworn. Lyndell is monolithic. Sherlock is monolithic. Smart, monolithic things are centigrade. Green, timeworn things are unlipped. If something is excused and not timeworn then it is unlipped. Kind things are excused. If something is centigrade then it is fitful. All unlipped things are fitful. All acidulent, centigrade things are monolithic. If Lyndell is timeworn then Lyndell is centigrade. Sherlock is not acidulent.", "logic": "\nTimeworn(lyndell)\nMonolithic(lyndell)\nMonolithic(sherlock)\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and Monolithic(x) -> Centigrade(x))\nforall x (Centigrade(x) and Timeworn(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Excused(x) and not Timeworn(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Fitful(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Centigrade(x) -> Fitful(x))\nforall x (Unlipped(x) -> Fitful(x))\nforall x (Acidulent(x) and Centigrade(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nTimeworn(lyndell) -> Centigrade(lyndell)\n\nnot Acidulent(sherlock)\n\nnot Acidulent(sherlock) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Raj is quondam. Raj is modest. Audrey is modest. Smart, modest things are advised. Green, quondam things are icebound. If something is conclusive and not quondam then it is icebound. Kind things are conclusive. If something is advised then it is illicit. All icebound things are illicit. All cringing, advised things are modest. If Raj is quondam then Raj is advised. Raj is cringing.", "logic": "\nQuondam(raj)\nModest(raj)\nModest(audrey)\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Modest(x) -> Advised(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) and Quondam(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Conclusive(x) and not Quondam(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Illicit(x) -> Conclusive(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Illicit(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Illicit(x))\nforall x (Cringing(x) and Advised(x) -> Modest(x))\nQuondam(raj) -> Advised(raj)\n\nCringing(raj)\n\nCringing(raj) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Hallie is animist. Hallie is not biggish. Hallie is decayable. Cold things are decayable. If Hallie is animist and Hallie is capillary then Hallie is fooling. Furry things are capillary. If something is capillary and not decayable then it is pretended. If something is capillary and not lettered then it is pretended. Cold, animist things are not pretended. Hallie is decayable.", "logic": "\nAnimist(hallie)\nnot Biggish(hallie)\nDecayable(hallie)\nforall x (Fooling(x) -> Decayable(x))\nAnimist(hallie) and Capillary(hallie) -> Fooling(hallie)\nforall x (Animist(x) -> Capillary(x))\nforall x (Capillary(x) and not Decayable(x) -> Pretended(x))\nforall x (Capillary(x) and not Lettered(x) -> Pretended(x))\nforall x (Fooling(x) and Animist(x) -> not Pretended(x))\n\nDecayable(hallie)\n\ntherefore Decayable(hallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Alanah is yellow. Alanah is not unlearned. Alanah is booming. Cold things are booming. If Alanah is yellow and Alanah is felicitous then Alanah is voltaic. Furry things are felicitous. If something is felicitous and not booming then it is flaunty. If something is felicitous and not swollen then it is flaunty. Cold, yellow things are not flaunty. Alanah is not yellow.", "logic": "\nYellow(alanah)\nnot Unlearned(alanah)\nBooming(alanah)\nforall x (Voltaic(x) -> Booming(x))\nYellow(alanah) and Felicitous(alanah) -> Voltaic(alanah)\nforall x (Yellow(x) -> Felicitous(x))\nforall x (Felicitous(x) and not Booming(x) -> Flaunty(x))\nforall x (Felicitous(x) and not Swollen(x) -> Flaunty(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) and Yellow(x) -> not Flaunty(x))\n\nnot Yellow(alanah)\n\ntherefore Yellow(alanah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Milzie is compulsory. Milzie is not subscript. Milzie is prophetic. Cold things are prophetic. If Milzie is compulsory and Milzie is shrimpy then Milzie is subacute. Furry things are shrimpy. If something is shrimpy and not prophetic then it is senatorial. If something is shrimpy and not perennial then it is senatorial. Cold, compulsory things are not senatorial. Milzie is shrimpy.", "logic": "\nCompulsory(milzie)\nnot Subscript(milzie)\nProphetic(milzie)\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Prophetic(x))\nCompulsory(milzie) and Shrimpy(milzie) -> Subacute(milzie)\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) and not Prophetic(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) and not Perennial(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Subacute(x) and Compulsory(x) -> not Senatorial(x))\n\nShrimpy(milzie)\n\nCompulsory(milzie) and forall x (Compulsory(x) -> Shrimpy(x)) -> therefore Shrimpy(milzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Jami is windblown. Jami is not suggestive. Jami is sonant. Cold things are sonant. If Jami is windblown and Jami is needlelike then Jami is junior. Furry things are needlelike. If something is needlelike and not sonant then it is cupric. If something is needlelike and not peccant then it is cupric. Cold, windblown things are not cupric. Jami is not needlelike.", "logic": "\nWindblown(jami)\nnot Suggestive(jami)\nSonant(jami)\nforall x (Junior(x) -> Sonant(x))\nWindblown(jami) and Needlelike(jami) -> Junior(jami)\nforall x (Windblown(x) -> Needlelike(x))\nforall x (Needlelike(x) and not Sonant(x) -> Cupric(x))\nforall x (Needlelike(x) and not Peccant(x) -> Cupric(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) and Windblown(x) -> not Cupric(x))\n\nnot Needlelike(jami)\n\nWindblown(jami) and forall x (Windblown(x) -> Needlelike(x)) -> therefore Needlelike(jami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Nela is vivid. Nela is not semipublic. Nela is zonary. Cold things are zonary. If Nela is vivid and Nela is stemmatic then Nela is oratorical. Furry things are stemmatic. If something is stemmatic and not zonary then it is sabbatic. If something is stemmatic and not venous then it is sabbatic. Cold, vivid things are not sabbatic. Nela is oratorical.", "logic": "\nVivid(nela)\nnot Semipublic(nela)\nZonary(nela)\nforall x (Oratorical(x) -> Zonary(x))\nVivid(nela) and Stemmatic(nela) -> Oratorical(nela)\nforall x (Vivid(x) -> Stemmatic(x))\nforall x (Stemmatic(x) and not Zonary(x) -> Sabbatic(x))\nforall x (Stemmatic(x) and not Venous(x) -> Sabbatic(x))\nforall x (Oratorical(x) and Vivid(x) -> not Sabbatic(x))\n\nOratorical(nela)\n\nVivid(nela) and forall x (Vivid(x) -> Stemmatic(x)) -> therefore Stemmatic(nela) Vivid(nela) and Stemmatic(nela) and Vivid(nela) and Stemmatic(nela) -> Oratorical(nela) -> therefore Oratorical(nela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Ginnie is sigmoid. Ginnie is not alike. Ginnie is binaural. Cold things are binaural. If Ginnie is sigmoid and Ginnie is agnostic then Ginnie is eastmost. Furry things are agnostic. If something is agnostic and not binaural then it is colorectal. If something is agnostic and not adulterine then it is colorectal. Cold, sigmoid things are not colorectal. Ginnie is not eastmost.", "logic": "\nSigmoid(ginnie)\nnot Alike(ginnie)\nBinaural(ginnie)\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Binaural(x))\nSigmoid(ginnie) and Agnostic(ginnie) -> Eastmost(ginnie)\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) -> Agnostic(x))\nforall x (Agnostic(x) and not Binaural(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Agnostic(x) and not Adulterine(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) and Sigmoid(x) -> not Colorectal(x))\n\nnot Eastmost(ginnie)\n\nSigmoid(ginnie) and forall x (Sigmoid(x) -> Agnostic(x)) -> therefore Agnostic(ginnie) Sigmoid(ginnie) and Agnostic(ginnie) and Sigmoid(ginnie) and Agnostic(ginnie) -> Eastmost(ginnie) -> therefore Eastmost(ginnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Gui is twin. Gui is not modest. Gui is ascetic. Cold things are ascetic. If Gui is twin and Gui is blabby then Gui is nonbearing. Furry things are blabby. If something is blabby and not ascetic then it is bully. If something is blabby and not assailable then it is bully. Cold, twin things are not bully. Gui is not bully.", "logic": "\nTwin(gui)\nnot Modest(gui)\nAscetic(gui)\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nTwin(gui) and Blabby(gui) -> Nonbearing(gui)\nforall x (Twin(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Blabby(x) and not Ascetic(x) -> Bully(x))\nforall x (Blabby(x) and not Assailable(x) -> Bully(x))\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) and Twin(x) -> not Bully(x))\n\nnot Bully(gui)\n\nTwin(gui) and forall x (Twin(x) -> Blabby(x)) -> therefore Blabby(gui) Twin(gui) and Blabby(gui) and Twin(gui) and Blabby(gui) -> Nonbearing(gui) -> therefore Nonbearing(gui) Nonbearing(gui) and Twin(gui) and forall x (Nonbearing(x) and Twin(x) -> not Bully(x)) -> therefore not Bully(gui)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Morissa is buttony. Morissa is not unlicenced. Morissa is rapt. Cold things are rapt. If Morissa is buttony and Morissa is frantic then Morissa is anodyne. Furry things are frantic. If something is frantic and not rapt then it is pushful. If something is frantic and not bilobed then it is pushful. Cold, buttony things are not pushful. Morissa is pushful.", "logic": "\nButtony(morissa)\nnot Unlicenced(morissa)\nRapt(morissa)\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Rapt(x))\nButtony(morissa) and Frantic(morissa) -> Anodyne(morissa)\nforall x (Buttony(x) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Frantic(x) and not Rapt(x) -> Pushful(x))\nforall x (Frantic(x) and not Bilobed(x) -> Pushful(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) and Buttony(x) -> not Pushful(x))\n\nPushful(morissa)\n\nButtony(morissa) and forall x (Buttony(x) -> Frantic(x)) -> therefore Frantic(morissa) Buttony(morissa) and Frantic(morissa) and Buttony(morissa) and Frantic(morissa) -> Anodyne(morissa) -> therefore Anodyne(morissa) Anodyne(morissa) and Buttony(morissa) and forall x (Anodyne(x) and Buttony(x) -> not Pushful(x)) -> therefore not Pushful(morissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "The quigman people the florinda. The florinda sink the quigman. The florinda does not visit the quigman. If something retrain the quigman then the quigman sink the florinda. If something sink the florinda then it retrain the florinda. If something people the quigman then it retrain the florinda. If something is sphingine then it does not like the florinda. If the florinda sink the quigman then the florinda retrain the quigman. If something retrain the florinda and the florinda is not agitated then the florinda sink the quigman. If something retrain the quigman then it people the florinda. If something retrain the florinda and it is not tufted then it sink the florinda. The quigman people the florinda.", "logic": "\nPeople(quigman, florinda)\nSink(florinda, quigman)\nnot People(florinda, quigman)\nforall x (Retrain(x, quigman) -> Sink(quigman, florinda))\nforall x (Sink(x, florinda) -> Retrain(x, florinda))\nforall x (People(x, quigman) -> Retrain(x, florinda))\nforall x (Sphingine(x) -> not Retrain(x, florinda))\nSink(florinda, quigman) -> Retrain(florinda, quigman)\nforall x (Retrain(x, florinda) and not Agitated(florinda) -> Sink(florinda, quigman))\nforall x (Retrain(x, quigman) -> People(x, florinda))\nforall x (Retrain(x, florinda) and not Tufted(x) -> Sink(x, florinda))\n\nPeople(quigman, florinda)\n\ntherefore People(quigman, florinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The tadd split the katherina. The katherina syncopate the tadd. The katherina does not visit the tadd. If something survey the tadd then the tadd syncopate the katherina. If something syncopate the katherina then it survey the katherina. If something split the tadd then it survey the katherina. If something is unlisted then it does not like the katherina. If the katherina syncopate the tadd then the katherina survey the tadd. If something survey the katherina and the katherina is not uxorial then the katherina syncopate the tadd. If something survey the tadd then it split the katherina. If something survey the katherina and it is not unhuman then it syncopate the katherina. The katherina split the tadd.", "logic": "\nSplit(tadd, katherina)\nSyncopate(katherina, tadd)\nnot Split(katherina, tadd)\nforall x (Survey(x, tadd) -> Syncopate(tadd, katherina))\nforall x (Syncopate(x, katherina) -> Survey(x, katherina))\nforall x (Split(x, tadd) -> Survey(x, katherina))\nforall x (Unlisted(x) -> not Survey(x, katherina))\nSyncopate(katherina, tadd) -> Survey(katherina, tadd)\nforall x (Survey(x, katherina) and not Uxorial(katherina) -> Syncopate(katherina, tadd))\nforall x (Survey(x, tadd) -> Split(x, katherina))\nforall x (Survey(x, katherina) and not Unhuman(x) -> Syncopate(x, katherina))\n\nSplit(katherina, tadd)\n\ntherefore not Split(katherina, tadd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The eugenie diverge the kacy. The kacy enshrine the eugenie. The kacy does not visit the eugenie. If something abduce the eugenie then the eugenie enshrine the kacy. If something enshrine the kacy then it abduce the kacy. If something diverge the eugenie then it abduce the kacy. If something is monotonous then it does not like the kacy. If the kacy enshrine the eugenie then the kacy abduce the eugenie. If something abduce the kacy and the kacy is not dowered then the kacy enshrine the eugenie. If something abduce the eugenie then it diverge the kacy. If something abduce the kacy and it is not minimum then it enshrine the kacy. The kacy abduce the eugenie.", "logic": "\nDiverge(eugenie, kacy)\nEnshrine(kacy, eugenie)\nnot Diverge(kacy, eugenie)\nforall x (Abduce(x, eugenie) -> Enshrine(eugenie, kacy))\nforall x (Enshrine(x, kacy) -> Abduce(x, kacy))\nforall x (Diverge(x, eugenie) -> Abduce(x, kacy))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> not Abduce(x, kacy))\nEnshrine(kacy, eugenie) -> Abduce(kacy, eugenie)\nforall x (Abduce(x, kacy) and not Dowered(kacy) -> Enshrine(kacy, eugenie))\nforall x (Abduce(x, eugenie) -> Diverge(x, kacy))\nforall x (Abduce(x, kacy) and not Minimum(x) -> Enshrine(x, kacy))\n\nAbduce(kacy, eugenie)\n\nEnshrine(kacy, eugenie) and Enshrine(kacy, eugenie) -> Abduce(kacy, eugenie) -> therefore Abduce(kacy, eugenie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The phillipe school the corie. The corie symbolise the phillipe. The corie does not visit the phillipe. If something ostracize the phillipe then the phillipe symbolise the corie. If something symbolise the corie then it ostracize the corie. If something school the phillipe then it ostracize the corie. If something is lean then it does not like the corie. If the corie symbolise the phillipe then the corie ostracize the phillipe. If something ostracize the corie and the corie is not isothermic then the corie symbolise the phillipe. If something ostracize the phillipe then it school the corie. If something ostracize the corie and it is not sweetish then it symbolise the corie. The corie does not like the phillipe.", "logic": "\nSchool(phillipe, corie)\nSymbolise(corie, phillipe)\nnot School(corie, phillipe)\nforall x (Ostracize(x, phillipe) -> Symbolise(phillipe, corie))\nforall x (Symbolise(x, corie) -> Ostracize(x, corie))\nforall x (School(x, phillipe) -> Ostracize(x, corie))\nforall x (Lean(x) -> not Ostracize(x, corie))\nSymbolise(corie, phillipe) -> Ostracize(corie, phillipe)\nforall x (Ostracize(x, corie) and not Isothermic(corie) -> Symbolise(corie, phillipe))\nforall x (Ostracize(x, phillipe) -> School(x, corie))\nforall x (Ostracize(x, corie) and not Sweetish(x) -> Symbolise(x, corie))\n\nnot Ostracize(corie, phillipe)\n\nSymbolise(corie, phillipe) and Symbolise(corie, phillipe) -> Ostracize(corie, phillipe) -> therefore Ostracize(corie, phillipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The evania desolate the paula. The paula sclaff the evania. The paula does not visit the evania. If something lenify the evania then the evania sclaff the paula. If something sclaff the paula then it lenify the paula. If something desolate the evania then it lenify the paula. If something is thin then it does not like the paula. If the paula sclaff the evania then the paula lenify the evania. If something lenify the paula and the paula is not cordate then the paula sclaff the evania. If something lenify the evania then it desolate the paula. If something lenify the paula and it is not dextrorsal then it sclaff the paula. The paula desolate the paula.", "logic": "\nDesolate(evania, paula)\nSclaff(paula, evania)\nnot Desolate(paula, evania)\nforall x (Lenify(x, evania) -> Sclaff(evania, paula))\nforall x (Sclaff(x, paula) -> Lenify(x, paula))\nforall x (Desolate(x, evania) -> Lenify(x, paula))\nforall x (Thin(x) -> not Lenify(x, paula))\nSclaff(paula, evania) -> Lenify(paula, evania)\nforall x (Lenify(x, paula) and not Cordate(paula) -> Sclaff(paula, evania))\nforall x (Lenify(x, evania) -> Desolate(x, paula))\nforall x (Lenify(x, paula) and not Dextrorsal(x) -> Sclaff(x, paula))\n\nDesolate(paula, paula)\n\nSclaff(paula, evania) and Sclaff(paula, evania) -> Lenify(paula, evania) -> therefore Lenify(paula, evania) Lenify(paula, evania) and forall x (Lenify(x, evania) -> Desolate(x, paula)) -> therefore Desolate(paula, paula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The tiffany prize the dulcine. The dulcine cull the tiffany. The dulcine does not visit the tiffany. If something reassign the tiffany then the tiffany cull the dulcine. If something cull the dulcine then it reassign the dulcine. If something prize the tiffany then it reassign the dulcine. If something is energetic then it does not like the dulcine. If the dulcine cull the tiffany then the dulcine reassign the tiffany. If something reassign the dulcine and the dulcine is not aleuronic then the dulcine cull the tiffany. If something reassign the tiffany then it prize the dulcine. If something reassign the dulcine and it is not limpid then it cull the dulcine. The tiffany does not need the dulcine.", "logic": "\nPrize(tiffany, dulcine)\nCull(dulcine, tiffany)\nnot Prize(dulcine, tiffany)\nforall x (Reassign(x, tiffany) -> Cull(tiffany, dulcine))\nforall x (Cull(x, dulcine) -> Reassign(x, dulcine))\nforall x (Prize(x, tiffany) -> Reassign(x, dulcine))\nforall x (Energetic(x) -> not Reassign(x, dulcine))\nCull(dulcine, tiffany) -> Reassign(dulcine, tiffany)\nforall x (Reassign(x, dulcine) and not Aleuronic(dulcine) -> Cull(dulcine, tiffany))\nforall x (Reassign(x, tiffany) -> Prize(x, dulcine))\nforall x (Reassign(x, dulcine) and not Limpid(x) -> Cull(x, dulcine))\n\nnot Cull(tiffany, dulcine)\n\nCull(dulcine, tiffany) and Cull(dulcine, tiffany) -> Reassign(dulcine, tiffany) -> therefore Reassign(dulcine, tiffany) Reassign(dulcine, tiffany) and forall x (Reassign(x, tiffany) -> Cull(tiffany, dulcine)) -> therefore Cull(tiffany, dulcine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The juergen coldcock the deeann. The deeann heal the juergen. The deeann does not visit the juergen. If something ford the juergen then the juergen heal the deeann. If something heal the deeann then it ford the deeann. If something coldcock the juergen then it ford the deeann. If something is indisposed then it does not like the deeann. If the deeann heal the juergen then the deeann ford the juergen. If something ford the deeann and the deeann is not serial then the deeann heal the juergen. If something ford the juergen then it coldcock the deeann. If something ford the deeann and it is not enchained then it heal the deeann. The juergen ford the deeann.", "logic": "\nColdcock(juergen, deeann)\nHeal(deeann, juergen)\nnot Coldcock(deeann, juergen)\nforall x (Ford(x, juergen) -> Heal(juergen, deeann))\nforall x (Heal(x, deeann) -> Ford(x, deeann))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, juergen) -> Ford(x, deeann))\nforall x (Indisposed(x) -> not Ford(x, deeann))\nHeal(deeann, juergen) -> Ford(deeann, juergen)\nforall x (Ford(x, deeann) and not Serial(deeann) -> Heal(deeann, juergen))\nforall x (Ford(x, juergen) -> Coldcock(x, deeann))\nforall x (Ford(x, deeann) and not Enchained(x) -> Heal(x, deeann))\n\nFord(juergen, deeann)\n\nHeal(deeann, juergen) and Heal(deeann, juergen) -> Ford(deeann, juergen) -> therefore Ford(deeann, juergen) Ford(deeann, juergen) and forall x (Ford(x, juergen) -> Heal(juergen, deeann)) -> therefore Heal(juergen, deeann) Heal(juergen, deeann) and forall x (Heal(x, deeann) -> Ford(x, deeann)) -> therefore Ford(juergen, deeann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The vivyan resist the ingram. The ingram ebonize the vivyan. The ingram does not visit the vivyan. If something botanise the vivyan then the vivyan ebonize the ingram. If something ebonize the ingram then it botanise the ingram. If something resist the vivyan then it botanise the ingram. If something is unclothed then it does not like the ingram. If the ingram ebonize the vivyan then the ingram botanise the vivyan. If something botanise the ingram and the ingram is not beautiful then the ingram ebonize the vivyan. If something botanise the vivyan then it resist the ingram. If something botanise the ingram and it is not assorted then it ebonize the ingram. The vivyan does not like the ingram.", "logic": "\nResist(vivyan, ingram)\nEbonize(ingram, vivyan)\nnot Resist(ingram, vivyan)\nforall x (Botanise(x, vivyan) -> Ebonize(vivyan, ingram))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, ingram) -> Botanise(x, ingram))\nforall x (Resist(x, vivyan) -> Botanise(x, ingram))\nforall x (Unclothed(x) -> not Botanise(x, ingram))\nEbonize(ingram, vivyan) -> Botanise(ingram, vivyan)\nforall x (Botanise(x, ingram) and not Beautiful(ingram) -> Ebonize(ingram, vivyan))\nforall x (Botanise(x, vivyan) -> Resist(x, ingram))\nforall x (Botanise(x, ingram) and not Assorted(x) -> Ebonize(x, ingram))\n\nnot Botanise(vivyan, ingram)\n\nEbonize(ingram, vivyan) and Ebonize(ingram, vivyan) -> Botanise(ingram, vivyan) -> therefore Botanise(ingram, vivyan) Botanise(ingram, vivyan) and forall x (Botanise(x, vivyan) -> Ebonize(vivyan, ingram)) -> therefore Ebonize(vivyan, ingram) Ebonize(vivyan, ingram) and forall x (Ebonize(x, ingram) -> Botanise(x, ingram)) -> therefore Botanise(vivyan, ingram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The arie amass the bari. The bari rocket the arie. The bari does not visit the arie. If something blot the arie then the arie rocket the bari. If something rocket the bari then it blot the bari. If something amass the arie then it blot the bari. If something is preanal then it does not like the bari. If the bari rocket the arie then the bari blot the arie. If something blot the bari and the bari is not booming then the bari rocket the arie. If something blot the arie then it amass the bari. If something blot the bari and it is not rugged then it rocket the bari. The bari does not like the bari.", "logic": "\nAmass(arie, bari)\nRocket(bari, arie)\nnot Amass(bari, arie)\nforall x (Blot(x, arie) -> Rocket(arie, bari))\nforall x (Rocket(x, bari) -> Blot(x, bari))\nforall x (Amass(x, arie) -> Blot(x, bari))\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> not Blot(x, bari))\nRocket(bari, arie) -> Blot(bari, arie)\nforall x (Blot(x, bari) and not Booming(bari) -> Rocket(bari, arie))\nforall x (Blot(x, arie) -> Amass(x, bari))\nforall x (Blot(x, bari) and not Rugged(x) -> Rocket(x, bari))\n\nnot Blot(bari, bari)\n\nforall x (Rocket(x, bari) -> Blot(x, bari)) <- forall x (Blot(x, bari) and not Rugged(x) -> Rocket(x, bari)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The nidia pummel the felicio. The felicio enthral the nidia. The felicio does not visit the nidia. If something breakfast the nidia then the nidia enthral the felicio. If something enthral the felicio then it breakfast the felicio. If something pummel the nidia then it breakfast the felicio. If something is analeptic then it does not like the felicio. If the felicio enthral the nidia then the felicio breakfast the nidia. If something breakfast the felicio and the felicio is not raised then the felicio enthral the nidia. If something breakfast the nidia then it pummel the felicio. If something breakfast the felicio and it is not jolly then it enthral the felicio. The felicio enthral the felicio.", "logic": "\nPummel(nidia, felicio)\nEnthral(felicio, nidia)\nnot Pummel(felicio, nidia)\nforall x (Breakfast(x, nidia) -> Enthral(nidia, felicio))\nforall x (Enthral(x, felicio) -> Breakfast(x, felicio))\nforall x (Pummel(x, nidia) -> Breakfast(x, felicio))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> not Breakfast(x, felicio))\nEnthral(felicio, nidia) -> Breakfast(felicio, nidia)\nforall x (Breakfast(x, felicio) and not Raised(felicio) -> Enthral(felicio, nidia))\nforall x (Breakfast(x, nidia) -> Pummel(x, felicio))\nforall x (Breakfast(x, felicio) and not Jolly(x) -> Enthral(x, felicio))\n\nEnthral(felicio, felicio)\n\nforall x (Breakfast(x, felicio) and not Jolly(x) -> Enthral(x, felicio)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The jim deaminate the aube. The aube represent the jim. The aube does not visit the jim. If something swoon the jim then the jim represent the aube. If something represent the aube then it swoon the aube. If something deaminate the jim then it swoon the aube. If something is barbarian then it does not like the aube. If the aube represent the jim then the aube swoon the jim. If something swoon the aube and the aube is not petaloid then the aube represent the jim. If something swoon the jim then it deaminate the aube. If something swoon the aube and it is not lettered then it represent the aube. The jim does not like the jim.", "logic": "\nDeaminate(jim, aube)\nRepresent(aube, jim)\nnot Deaminate(aube, jim)\nforall x (Swoon(x, jim) -> Represent(jim, aube))\nforall x (Represent(x, aube) -> Swoon(x, aube))\nforall x (Deaminate(x, jim) -> Swoon(x, aube))\nforall x (Barbarian(x) -> not Swoon(x, aube))\nRepresent(aube, jim) -> Swoon(aube, jim)\nforall x (Swoon(x, aube) and not Petaloid(aube) -> Represent(aube, jim))\nforall x (Swoon(x, jim) -> Deaminate(x, aube))\nforall x (Swoon(x, aube) and not Lettered(x) -> Represent(x, aube))\n\nnot Swoon(jim, jim)\n\nnot Swoon(jim, jim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The elise flutter the caroleen. The caroleen intubate the elise. The caroleen does not visit the elise. If something mash the elise then the elise intubate the caroleen. If something intubate the caroleen then it mash the caroleen. If something flutter the elise then it mash the caroleen. If something is goaded then it does not like the caroleen. If the caroleen intubate the elise then the caroleen mash the elise. If something mash the caroleen and the caroleen is not maidenlike then the caroleen intubate the elise. If something mash the elise then it flutter the caroleen. If something mash the caroleen and it is not categorial then it intubate the caroleen. The caroleen is maidenlike.", "logic": "\nFlutter(elise, caroleen)\nIntubate(caroleen, elise)\nnot Flutter(caroleen, elise)\nforall x (Mash(x, elise) -> Intubate(elise, caroleen))\nforall x (Intubate(x, caroleen) -> Mash(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Flutter(x, elise) -> Mash(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Goaded(x) -> not Mash(x, caroleen))\nIntubate(caroleen, elise) -> Mash(caroleen, elise)\nforall x (Mash(x, caroleen) and not Maidenlike(caroleen) -> Intubate(caroleen, elise))\nforall x (Mash(x, elise) -> Flutter(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Mash(x, caroleen) and not Categorial(x) -> Intubate(x, caroleen))\n\nMaidenlike(caroleen)\n\nMaidenlike(caroleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The adena enounce the jessica. The jessica conclude the adena. The jessica does not visit the adena. If something animise the adena then the adena conclude the jessica. If something conclude the jessica then it animise the jessica. If something enounce the adena then it animise the jessica. If something is grenadian then it does not like the jessica. If the jessica conclude the adena then the jessica animise the adena. If something animise the jessica and the jessica is not motley then the jessica conclude the adena. If something animise the adena then it enounce the jessica. If something animise the jessica and it is not nuclear then it conclude the jessica. The adena is not kind.", "logic": "\nEnounce(adena, jessica)\nConclude(jessica, adena)\nnot Enounce(jessica, adena)\nforall x (Animise(x, adena) -> Conclude(adena, jessica))\nforall x (Conclude(x, jessica) -> Animise(x, jessica))\nforall x (Enounce(x, adena) -> Animise(x, jessica))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) -> not Animise(x, jessica))\nConclude(jessica, adena) -> Animise(jessica, adena)\nforall x (Animise(x, jessica) and not Motley(jessica) -> Conclude(jessica, adena))\nforall x (Animise(x, adena) -> Enounce(x, jessica))\nforall x (Animise(x, jessica) and not Nuclear(x) -> Conclude(x, jessica))\n\nnot Kind(adena)\n\nnot Kind(adena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The ozzy evangelize the tonie. The tonie toady the ozzy. The tonie does not visit the ozzy. If something bail the ozzy then the ozzy toady the tonie. If something toady the tonie then it bail the tonie. If something evangelize the ozzy then it bail the tonie. If something is overshot then it does not like the tonie. If the tonie toady the ozzy then the tonie bail the ozzy. If something bail the tonie and the tonie is not rampageous then the tonie toady the ozzy. If something bail the ozzy then it evangelize the tonie. If something bail the tonie and it is not predatory then it toady the tonie. The ozzy toady the ozzy.", "logic": "\nEvangelize(ozzy, tonie)\nToady(tonie, ozzy)\nnot Evangelize(tonie, ozzy)\nforall x (Bail(x, ozzy) -> Toady(ozzy, tonie))\nforall x (Toady(x, tonie) -> Bail(x, tonie))\nforall x (Evangelize(x, ozzy) -> Bail(x, tonie))\nforall x (Overshot(x) -> not Bail(x, tonie))\nToady(tonie, ozzy) -> Bail(tonie, ozzy)\nforall x (Bail(x, tonie) and not Rampageous(tonie) -> Toady(tonie, ozzy))\nforall x (Bail(x, ozzy) -> Evangelize(x, tonie))\nforall x (Bail(x, tonie) and not Predatory(x) -> Toady(x, tonie))\n\nToady(ozzy, ozzy)\n\nToady(ozzy, ozzy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The berkie skate the jolene. The jolene bevel the berkie. The jolene does not visit the berkie. If something trek the berkie then the berkie bevel the jolene. If something bevel the jolene then it trek the jolene. If something skate the berkie then it trek the jolene. If something is infective then it does not like the jolene. If the jolene bevel the berkie then the jolene trek the berkie. If something trek the jolene and the jolene is not embodied then the jolene bevel the berkie. If something trek the berkie then it skate the jolene. If something trek the jolene and it is not sincere then it bevel the jolene. The jolene is not infective.", "logic": "\nSkate(berkie, jolene)\nBevel(jolene, berkie)\nnot Skate(jolene, berkie)\nforall x (Trek(x, berkie) -> Bevel(berkie, jolene))\nforall x (Bevel(x, jolene) -> Trek(x, jolene))\nforall x (Skate(x, berkie) -> Trek(x, jolene))\nforall x (Infective(x) -> not Trek(x, jolene))\nBevel(jolene, berkie) -> Trek(jolene, berkie)\nforall x (Trek(x, jolene) and not Embodied(jolene) -> Bevel(jolene, berkie))\nforall x (Trek(x, berkie) -> Skate(x, jolene))\nforall x (Trek(x, jolene) and not Sincere(x) -> Bevel(x, jolene))\n\nnot Infective(jolene)\n\nnot Infective(jolene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The winne fulminate the eugenie. The eugenie habit the winne. The eugenie does not visit the winne. If something snafu the winne then the winne habit the eugenie. If something habit the eugenie then it snafu the eugenie. If something fulminate the winne then it snafu the eugenie. If something is unembodied then it does not like the eugenie. If the eugenie habit the winne then the eugenie snafu the winne. If something snafu the eugenie and the eugenie is not baleful then the eugenie habit the winne. If something snafu the winne then it fulminate the eugenie. If something snafu the eugenie and it is not lightproof then it habit the eugenie. The winne fulminate the winne.", "logic": "\nFulminate(winne, eugenie)\nHabit(eugenie, winne)\nnot Fulminate(eugenie, winne)\nforall x (Snafu(x, winne) -> Habit(winne, eugenie))\nforall x (Habit(x, eugenie) -> Snafu(x, eugenie))\nforall x (Fulminate(x, winne) -> Snafu(x, eugenie))\nforall x (Unembodied(x) -> not Snafu(x, eugenie))\nHabit(eugenie, winne) -> Snafu(eugenie, winne)\nforall x (Snafu(x, eugenie) and not Baleful(eugenie) -> Habit(eugenie, winne))\nforall x (Snafu(x, winne) -> Fulminate(x, eugenie))\nforall x (Snafu(x, eugenie) and not Lightproof(x) -> Habit(x, eugenie))\n\nFulminate(winne, winne)\n\nFulminate(winne, winne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "Kingsley is devouring. Kingsley is clement. Kingsley is thorough. Kingsley is breathing. Kingsley is spic. Kingsley is candid. Kingsley is diclinous. Marita is thorough. Marita is spic. Marti is devouring. Marti is clement. Marti is thorough. Marti is breathing. Marti is candid. Marti is diclinous. If something is clement then it is spic. Round things are breathing. Rough, thorough things are candid. Quiet, spic things are breathing. Smart, spic things are diclinous. Kind, diclinous things are thorough. Marti is breathing.", "logic": "\nDevouring(kingsley)\nClement(kingsley)\nThorough(kingsley)\nBreathing(kingsley)\nSpic(kingsley)\nCandid(kingsley)\nDiclinous(kingsley)\nThorough(marita)\nSpic(marita)\nDevouring(marti)\nClement(marti)\nThorough(marti)\nBreathing(marti)\nCandid(marti)\nDiclinous(marti)\nforall x (Clement(x) -> Spic(x))\nforall x (Spic(x) -> Breathing(x))\nforall x (Breathing(x) and Thorough(x) -> Candid(x))\nforall x (Thorough(x) and Spic(x) -> Breathing(x))\nforall x (Candid(x) and Spic(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Clement(x) and Diclinous(x) -> Thorough(x))\n\nBreathing(marti)\n\ntherefore Breathing(marti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Brendan is enigmatic. Brendan is amiable. Brendan is unexcelled. Brendan is extensile. Brendan is disrupted. Brendan is bilgy. Brendan is hominine. Tuesday is unexcelled. Tuesday is disrupted. Rutger is enigmatic. Rutger is amiable. Rutger is unexcelled. Rutger is extensile. Rutger is bilgy. Rutger is hominine. If something is amiable then it is disrupted. Round things are extensile. Rough, unexcelled things are bilgy. Quiet, disrupted things are extensile. Smart, disrupted things are hominine. Kind, hominine things are unexcelled. Rutger is not unexcelled.", "logic": "\nEnigmatic(brendan)\nAmiable(brendan)\nUnexcelled(brendan)\nExtensile(brendan)\nDisrupted(brendan)\nBilgy(brendan)\nHominine(brendan)\nUnexcelled(tuesday)\nDisrupted(tuesday)\nEnigmatic(rutger)\nAmiable(rutger)\nUnexcelled(rutger)\nExtensile(rutger)\nBilgy(rutger)\nHominine(rutger)\nforall x (Amiable(x) -> Disrupted(x))\nforall x (Disrupted(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) and Unexcelled(x) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) and Disrupted(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Bilgy(x) and Disrupted(x) -> Hominine(x))\nforall x (Amiable(x) and Hominine(x) -> Unexcelled(x))\n\nnot Unexcelled(rutger)\n\ntherefore Unexcelled(rutger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Maddi is revolting. Maddi is citric. Maddi is wasted. Maddi is timid. Maddi is unabated. Maddi is extricable. Maddi is parous. Rickey is wasted. Rickey is unabated. Zondra is revolting. Zondra is citric. Zondra is wasted. Zondra is timid. Zondra is extricable. Zondra is parous. If something is citric then it is unabated. Round things are timid. Rough, wasted things are extricable. Quiet, unabated things are timid. Smart, unabated things are parous. Kind, parous things are wasted. Rickey is timid.", "logic": "\nRevolting(maddi)\nCitric(maddi)\nWasted(maddi)\nTimid(maddi)\nUnabated(maddi)\nExtricable(maddi)\nParous(maddi)\nWasted(rickey)\nUnabated(rickey)\nRevolting(zondra)\nCitric(zondra)\nWasted(zondra)\nTimid(zondra)\nExtricable(zondra)\nParous(zondra)\nforall x (Citric(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) and Wasted(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Wasted(x) and Unabated(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and Unabated(x) -> Parous(x))\nforall x (Citric(x) and Parous(x) -> Wasted(x))\n\nTimid(rickey)\n\nUnabated(rickey) and forall x (Unabated(x) -> Timid(x)) -> therefore Timid(rickey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Harv is arched. Harv is miasmal. Harv is dentate. Harv is insolvable. Harv is referable. Harv is bismuthal. Harv is other. Ashton is dentate. Ashton is referable. Durand is arched. Durand is miasmal. Durand is dentate. Durand is insolvable. Durand is bismuthal. Durand is other. If something is miasmal then it is referable. Round things are insolvable. Rough, dentate things are bismuthal. Quiet, referable things are insolvable. Smart, referable things are other. Kind, other things are dentate. Ashton is not insolvable.", "logic": "\nArched(harv)\nMiasmal(harv)\nDentate(harv)\nInsolvable(harv)\nReferable(harv)\nBismuthal(harv)\nOther(harv)\nDentate(ashton)\nReferable(ashton)\nArched(durand)\nMiasmal(durand)\nDentate(durand)\nInsolvable(durand)\nBismuthal(durand)\nOther(durand)\nforall x (Miasmal(x) -> Referable(x))\nforall x (Referable(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Dentate(x) -> Bismuthal(x))\nforall x (Dentate(x) and Referable(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) and Referable(x) -> Other(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Other(x) -> Dentate(x))\n\nnot Insolvable(ashton)\n\nReferable(ashton) and forall x (Referable(x) -> Insolvable(x)) -> therefore Insolvable(ashton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Wakefield is metrical. Wakefield is gracious. Wakefield is devious. Wakefield is facial. Wakefield is leechlike. Wakefield is raring. Wakefield is swayback. Marlo is devious. Marlo is leechlike. Dierdre is metrical. Dierdre is gracious. Dierdre is devious. Dierdre is facial. Dierdre is raring. Dierdre is swayback. If something is gracious then it is leechlike. Round things are facial. Rough, devious things are raring. Quiet, leechlike things are facial. Smart, leechlike things are swayback. Kind, swayback things are devious. Marlo is raring.", "logic": "\nMetrical(wakefield)\nGracious(wakefield)\nDevious(wakefield)\nFacial(wakefield)\nLeechlike(wakefield)\nRaring(wakefield)\nSwayback(wakefield)\nDevious(marlo)\nLeechlike(marlo)\nMetrical(dierdre)\nGracious(dierdre)\nDevious(dierdre)\nFacial(dierdre)\nRaring(dierdre)\nSwayback(dierdre)\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) -> Facial(x))\nforall x (Facial(x) and Devious(x) -> Raring(x))\nforall x (Devious(x) and Leechlike(x) -> Facial(x))\nforall x (Raring(x) and Leechlike(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Gracious(x) and Swayback(x) -> Devious(x))\n\nRaring(marlo)\n\nLeechlike(marlo) and forall x (Leechlike(x) -> Facial(x)) -> therefore Facial(marlo) Facial(marlo) and Devious(marlo) and forall x (Facial(x) and Devious(x) -> Raring(x)) -> therefore Raring(marlo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Corilla is occult. Corilla is pandurate. Corilla is auriform. Corilla is proficient. Corilla is rhymeless. Corilla is albinic. Corilla is molecular. Karina is auriform. Karina is rhymeless. Clarisa is occult. Clarisa is pandurate. Clarisa is auriform. Clarisa is proficient. Clarisa is albinic. Clarisa is molecular. If something is pandurate then it is rhymeless. Round things are proficient. Rough, auriform things are albinic. Quiet, rhymeless things are proficient. Smart, rhymeless things are molecular. Kind, molecular things are auriform. Karina is not albinic.", "logic": "\nOccult(corilla)\nPandurate(corilla)\nAuriform(corilla)\nProficient(corilla)\nRhymeless(corilla)\nAlbinic(corilla)\nMolecular(corilla)\nAuriform(karina)\nRhymeless(karina)\nOccult(clarisa)\nPandurate(clarisa)\nAuriform(clarisa)\nProficient(clarisa)\nAlbinic(clarisa)\nMolecular(clarisa)\nforall x (Pandurate(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Proficient(x) and Auriform(x) -> Albinic(x))\nforall x (Auriform(x) and Rhymeless(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Albinic(x) and Rhymeless(x) -> Molecular(x))\nforall x (Pandurate(x) and Molecular(x) -> Auriform(x))\n\nnot Albinic(karina)\n\nRhymeless(karina) and forall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Proficient(x)) -> therefore Proficient(karina) Proficient(karina) and Auriform(karina) and forall x (Proficient(x) and Auriform(x) -> Albinic(x)) -> therefore Albinic(karina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Yetty is unspoken. Yetty is endogenous. Yetty is concurrent. Yetty is prospering. Yetty is officious. Yetty is ossiculate. Yetty is splintery. Crissie is concurrent. Crissie is officious. Alameda is unspoken. Alameda is endogenous. Alameda is concurrent. Alameda is prospering. Alameda is ossiculate. Alameda is splintery. If something is endogenous then it is officious. Round things are prospering. Rough, concurrent things are ossiculate. Quiet, officious things are prospering. Smart, officious things are splintery. Kind, splintery things are concurrent. Crissie is splintery.", "logic": "\nUnspoken(yetty)\nEndogenous(yetty)\nConcurrent(yetty)\nProspering(yetty)\nOfficious(yetty)\nOssiculate(yetty)\nSplintery(yetty)\nConcurrent(crissie)\nOfficious(crissie)\nUnspoken(alameda)\nEndogenous(alameda)\nConcurrent(alameda)\nProspering(alameda)\nOssiculate(alameda)\nSplintery(alameda)\nforall x (Endogenous(x) -> Officious(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) -> Prospering(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) and Concurrent(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) and Officious(x) -> Prospering(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) and Officious(x) -> Splintery(x))\nforall x (Endogenous(x) and Splintery(x) -> Concurrent(x))\n\nSplintery(crissie)\n\nOfficious(crissie) and forall x (Officious(x) -> Prospering(x)) -> therefore Prospering(crissie) Prospering(crissie) and Concurrent(crissie) and forall x (Prospering(x) and Concurrent(x) -> Ossiculate(x)) -> therefore Ossiculate(crissie) Ossiculate(crissie) and Officious(crissie) and forall x (Ossiculate(x) and Officious(x) -> Splintery(x)) -> therefore Splintery(crissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Liuka is mined. Liuka is obvious. Liuka is bleached. Liuka is athirst. Liuka is squamulose. Liuka is cantonal. Liuka is tenth. Cristie is bleached. Cristie is squamulose. Devinne is mined. Devinne is obvious. Devinne is bleached. Devinne is athirst. Devinne is cantonal. Devinne is tenth. If something is obvious then it is squamulose. Round things are athirst. Rough, bleached things are cantonal. Quiet, squamulose things are athirst. Smart, squamulose things are tenth. Kind, tenth things are bleached. Cristie is not tenth.", "logic": "\nMined(liuka)\nObvious(liuka)\nBleached(liuka)\nAthirst(liuka)\nSquamulose(liuka)\nCantonal(liuka)\nTenth(liuka)\nBleached(cristie)\nSquamulose(cristie)\nMined(devinne)\nObvious(devinne)\nBleached(devinne)\nAthirst(devinne)\nCantonal(devinne)\nTenth(devinne)\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> Athirst(x))\nforall x (Athirst(x) and Bleached(x) -> Cantonal(x))\nforall x (Bleached(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Athirst(x))\nforall x (Cantonal(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) and Tenth(x) -> Bleached(x))\n\nnot Tenth(cristie)\n\nSquamulose(cristie) and forall x (Squamulose(x) -> Athirst(x)) -> therefore Athirst(cristie) Athirst(cristie) and Bleached(cristie) and forall x (Athirst(x) and Bleached(x) -> Cantonal(x)) -> therefore Cantonal(cristie) Cantonal(cristie) and Squamulose(cristie) and forall x (Cantonal(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Tenth(x)) -> therefore Tenth(cristie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Fernande is loverly. Fernande is hammy. Fernande is snafu. Fernande is biconvex. Fernande is histologic. Fernande is repeatable. Fernande is reddened. Amalia is snafu. Amalia is histologic. Wylie is loverly. Wylie is hammy. Wylie is snafu. Wylie is biconvex. Wylie is repeatable. Wylie is reddened. If something is hammy then it is histologic. Round things are biconvex. Rough, snafu things are repeatable. Quiet, histologic things are biconvex. Smart, histologic things are reddened. Kind, reddened things are snafu. Amalia is not loverly.", "logic": "\nLoverly(fernande)\nHammy(fernande)\nSnafu(fernande)\nBiconvex(fernande)\nHistologic(fernande)\nRepeatable(fernande)\nReddened(fernande)\nSnafu(amalia)\nHistologic(amalia)\nLoverly(wylie)\nHammy(wylie)\nSnafu(wylie)\nBiconvex(wylie)\nRepeatable(wylie)\nReddened(wylie)\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Histologic(x) -> Biconvex(x))\nforall x (Biconvex(x) and Snafu(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Snafu(x) and Histologic(x) -> Biconvex(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) and Histologic(x) -> Reddened(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) and Reddened(x) -> Snafu(x))\n\nnot Loverly(amalia)\n\nnot Loverly(amalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Glenna is torrential. Glenna is straplike. Glenna is unashamed. Glenna is gyroscopic. Glenna is unsociable. Glenna is agnostic. Glenna is incurved. Marit is unashamed. Marit is unsociable. Deryl is torrential. Deryl is straplike. Deryl is unashamed. Deryl is gyroscopic. Deryl is agnostic. Deryl is incurved. If something is straplike then it is unsociable. Round things are gyroscopic. Rough, unashamed things are agnostic. Quiet, unsociable things are gyroscopic. Smart, unsociable things are incurved. Kind, incurved things are unashamed. Marit is straplike.", "logic": "\nTorrential(glenna)\nStraplike(glenna)\nUnashamed(glenna)\nGyroscopic(glenna)\nUnsociable(glenna)\nAgnostic(glenna)\nIncurved(glenna)\nUnashamed(marit)\nUnsociable(marit)\nTorrential(deryl)\nStraplike(deryl)\nUnashamed(deryl)\nGyroscopic(deryl)\nAgnostic(deryl)\nIncurved(deryl)\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> Unsociable(x))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) and Unashamed(x) -> Agnostic(x))\nforall x (Unashamed(x) and Unsociable(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Agnostic(x) and Unsociable(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Straplike(x) and Incurved(x) -> Unashamed(x))\n\nStraplike(marit)\n\nStraplike(marit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Arlie is laudatory. Candie is intriguing. Margette is walleyed. Rough, agleam things are regal. All intriguing things are walleyed. White, intriguing things are agleam. If something is embroiled and toeless then it is intriguing. If something is agleam then it is laudatory. All walleyed, intriguing things are agleam. Arlie is laudatory.", "logic": "\nLaudatory(arlie)\nIntriguing(candie)\nWalleyed(margette)\nforall x (Laudatory(x) and Agleam(x) -> Regal(x))\nforall x (Intriguing(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and Intriguing(x) -> Agleam(x))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and Toeless(x) -> Intriguing(x))\nforall x (Agleam(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) and Intriguing(x) -> Agleam(x))\n\nLaudatory(arlie)\n\ntherefore Laudatory(arlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Rab is leftover. Olivie is jinxed. Gerianne is endearing. Rough, nonsweet things are beery. All jinxed things are endearing. White, jinxed things are nonsweet. If something is elastic and gladdened then it is jinxed. If something is nonsweet then it is leftover. All endearing, jinxed things are nonsweet. Olivie is not jinxed.", "logic": "\nLeftover(rab)\nJinxed(olivie)\nEndearing(gerianne)\nforall x (Leftover(x) and Nonsweet(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) and Jinxed(x) -> Nonsweet(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Nonsweet(x) -> Leftover(x))\nforall x (Endearing(x) and Jinxed(x) -> Nonsweet(x))\n\nnot Jinxed(olivie)\n\ntherefore Jinxed(olivie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Caprice is ravenous. Alison is lowbrow. Stephenie is cernuous. Rough, atomic things are sanitary. All lowbrow things are cernuous. White, lowbrow things are atomic. If something is crenulated and continual then it is lowbrow. If something is atomic then it is ravenous. All cernuous, lowbrow things are atomic. Alison is cernuous.", "logic": "\nRavenous(caprice)\nLowbrow(alison)\nCernuous(stephenie)\nforall x (Ravenous(x) and Atomic(x) -> Sanitary(x))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Crenulated(x) and Lowbrow(x) -> Atomic(x))\nforall x (Crenulated(x) and Continual(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\nforall x (Atomic(x) -> Ravenous(x))\nforall x (Cernuous(x) and Lowbrow(x) -> Atomic(x))\n\nCernuous(alison)\n\nLowbrow(alison) and forall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Cernuous(x)) -> therefore Cernuous(alison)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Pollyanna is mythical. Lucien is promissory. Bettie is mincing. Rough, future things are piscatory. All promissory things are mincing. White, promissory things are future. If something is alienable and fibreoptic then it is promissory. If something is future then it is mythical. All mincing, promissory things are future. Lucien is not mincing.", "logic": "\nMythical(pollyanna)\nPromissory(lucien)\nMincing(bettie)\nforall x (Mythical(x) and Future(x) -> Piscatory(x))\nforall x (Promissory(x) -> Mincing(x))\nforall x (Alienable(x) and Promissory(x) -> Future(x))\nforall x (Alienable(x) and Fibreoptic(x) -> Promissory(x))\nforall x (Future(x) -> Mythical(x))\nforall x (Mincing(x) and Promissory(x) -> Future(x))\n\nnot Mincing(lucien)\n\nPromissory(lucien) and forall x (Promissory(x) -> Mincing(x)) -> therefore Mincing(lucien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Ninnetta is lowset. Charmion is pliant. Aurie is whitish. Rough, cuban things are fourpenny. All pliant things are whitish. White, pliant things are cuban. If something is untruthful and profitable then it is pliant. If something is cuban then it is lowset. All whitish, pliant things are cuban. Charmion is cuban.", "logic": "\nLowset(ninnetta)\nPliant(charmion)\nWhitish(aurie)\nforall x (Lowset(x) and Cuban(x) -> Fourpenny(x))\nforall x (Pliant(x) -> Whitish(x))\nforall x (Untruthful(x) and Pliant(x) -> Cuban(x))\nforall x (Untruthful(x) and Profitable(x) -> Pliant(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Lowset(x))\nforall x (Whitish(x) and Pliant(x) -> Cuban(x))\n\nCuban(charmion)\n\nPliant(charmion) and forall x (Pliant(x) -> Whitish(x)) -> therefore Whitish(charmion) Whitish(charmion) and Pliant(charmion) and forall x (Whitish(x) and Pliant(x) -> Cuban(x)) -> therefore Cuban(charmion)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Lauri is fogbound. Rikki is vindicated. Arnoldo is flameproof. Rough, edental things are pneumatic. All vindicated things are flameproof. White, vindicated things are edental. If something is bullnecked and executive then it is vindicated. If something is edental then it is fogbound. All flameproof, vindicated things are edental. Rikki is not edental.", "logic": "\nFogbound(lauri)\nVindicated(rikki)\nFlameproof(arnoldo)\nforall x (Fogbound(x) and Edental(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Vindicated(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) and Vindicated(x) -> Edental(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) and Executive(x) -> Vindicated(x))\nforall x (Edental(x) -> Fogbound(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Vindicated(x) -> Edental(x))\n\nnot Edental(rikki)\n\nVindicated(rikki) and forall x (Vindicated(x) -> Flameproof(x)) -> therefore Flameproof(rikki) Flameproof(rikki) and Vindicated(rikki) and forall x (Flameproof(x) and Vindicated(x) -> Edental(x)) -> therefore Edental(rikki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Agatha is puppyish. Shorty is vasiform. Barris is coarctate. Rough, zoonotic things are enviable. All vasiform things are coarctate. White, vasiform things are zoonotic. If something is unvaried and fretted then it is vasiform. If something is zoonotic then it is puppyish. All coarctate, vasiform things are zoonotic. Shorty is puppyish.", "logic": "\nPuppyish(agatha)\nVasiform(shorty)\nCoarctate(barris)\nforall x (Puppyish(x) and Zoonotic(x) -> Enviable(x))\nforall x (Vasiform(x) -> Coarctate(x))\nforall x (Unvaried(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Zoonotic(x))\nforall x (Unvaried(x) and Fretted(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Zoonotic(x) -> Puppyish(x))\nforall x (Coarctate(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Zoonotic(x))\n\nPuppyish(shorty)\n\nVasiform(shorty) and forall x (Vasiform(x) -> Coarctate(x)) -> therefore Coarctate(shorty) Coarctate(shorty) and Vasiform(shorty) and forall x (Coarctate(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Zoonotic(x)) -> therefore Zoonotic(shorty) Zoonotic(shorty) and forall x (Zoonotic(x) -> Puppyish(x)) -> therefore Puppyish(shorty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Percy is goofy. Mort is fired. Jeraldine is pneumatic. Rough, left things are downlike. All fired things are pneumatic. White, fired things are left. If something is untroubled and prefatory then it is fired. If something is left then it is goofy. All pneumatic, fired things are left. Mort is not goofy.", "logic": "\nGoofy(percy)\nFired(mort)\nPneumatic(jeraldine)\nforall x (Goofy(x) and Left(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) and Fired(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) and Prefatory(x) -> Fired(x))\nforall x (Left(x) -> Goofy(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Fired(x) -> Left(x))\n\nnot Goofy(mort)\n\nFired(mort) and forall x (Fired(x) -> Pneumatic(x)) -> therefore Pneumatic(mort) Pneumatic(mort) and Fired(mort) and forall x (Pneumatic(x) and Fired(x) -> Left(x)) -> therefore Left(mort) Left(mort) and forall x (Left(x) -> Goofy(x)) -> therefore Goofy(mort)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Joletta is maxi. Bertina is intruding. Caldwell is malposed. Rough, nicene things are blebby. All intruding things are malposed. White, intruding things are nicene. If something is flocculent and glabrous then it is intruding. If something is nicene then it is maxi. All malposed, intruding things are nicene. Caldwell is not nicene.", "logic": "\nMaxi(joletta)\nIntruding(bertina)\nMalposed(caldwell)\nforall x (Maxi(x) and Nicene(x) -> Blebby(x))\nforall x (Intruding(x) -> Malposed(x))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) and Intruding(x) -> Nicene(x))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) and Glabrous(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Nicene(x) -> Maxi(x))\nforall x (Malposed(x) and Intruding(x) -> Nicene(x))\n\nnot Nicene(caldwell)\n\nforall x (Malposed(x) and Intruding(x) -> Nicene(x)) <- forall x (Flocculent(x) and Glabrous(x) -> Intruding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Benita is unfree. Thomasin is lost. Rudy is haired. Rough, neuralgic things are fulsome. All lost things are haired. White, lost things are neuralgic. If something is cerebral and mutagenic then it is lost. If something is neuralgic then it is unfree. All haired, lost things are neuralgic. Benita is haired.", "logic": "\nUnfree(benita)\nLost(thomasin)\nHaired(rudy)\nforall x (Unfree(x) and Neuralgic(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Haired(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) and Lost(x) -> Neuralgic(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) and Mutagenic(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Haired(x) and Lost(x) -> Neuralgic(x))\n\nHaired(benita)\n\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Haired(x)) <- forall x (Cerebral(x) and Mutagenic(x) -> Lost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Flower is pyretic. Phyllis is fifteen. Daria is edible. Rough, slavelike things are retractile. All fifteen things are edible. White, fifteen things are slavelike. If something is domestic and calcific then it is fifteen. If something is slavelike then it is pyretic. All edible, fifteen things are slavelike. Daria is not fifteen.", "logic": "\nPyretic(flower)\nFifteen(phyllis)\nEdible(daria)\nforall x (Pyretic(x) and Slavelike(x) -> Retractile(x))\nforall x (Fifteen(x) -> Edible(x))\nforall x (Domestic(x) and Fifteen(x) -> Slavelike(x))\nforall x (Domestic(x) and Calcific(x) -> Fifteen(x))\nforall x (Slavelike(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) and Fifteen(x) -> Slavelike(x))\n\nnot Fifteen(daria)\n\nforall x (Domestic(x) and Calcific(x) -> Fifteen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Carolee is hortative. Pavel is edifying. Vonnie is succeeding. Rough, rarified things are fringy. All edifying things are succeeding. White, edifying things are rarified. If something is unanswered and pupillary then it is edifying. If something is rarified then it is hortative. All succeeding, edifying things are rarified. Carolee is rarified.", "logic": "\nHortative(carolee)\nEdifying(pavel)\nSucceeding(vonnie)\nforall x (Hortative(x) and Rarified(x) -> Fringy(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Unanswered(x) and Edifying(x) -> Rarified(x))\nforall x (Unanswered(x) and Pupillary(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Rarified(x) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Succeeding(x) and Edifying(x) -> Rarified(x))\n\nRarified(carolee)\n\nforall x (Succeeding(x) and Edifying(x) -> Rarified(x)) <- forall x (Unanswered(x) and Pupillary(x) -> Edifying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Sarita is lean. Lilyan is superior. Julieta is napoleonic. Rough, thriftless things are verifiable. All superior things are napoleonic. White, superior things are thriftless. If something is shrewish and unflawed then it is superior. If something is thriftless then it is lean. All napoleonic, superior things are thriftless. Sarita is not shrewish.", "logic": "\nLean(sarita)\nSuperior(lilyan)\nNapoleonic(julieta)\nforall x (Lean(x) and Thriftless(x) -> Verifiable(x))\nforall x (Superior(x) -> Napoleonic(x))\nforall x (Shrewish(x) and Superior(x) -> Thriftless(x))\nforall x (Shrewish(x) and Unflawed(x) -> Superior(x))\nforall x (Thriftless(x) -> Lean(x))\nforall x (Napoleonic(x) and Superior(x) -> Thriftless(x))\n\nnot Shrewish(sarita)\n\nnot Shrewish(sarita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Pammy is imaginable. Corry is cretinous. Serene is anonymous. Rough, demulcent things are strident. All cretinous things are anonymous. White, cretinous things are demulcent. If something is haphazard and observed then it is cretinous. If something is demulcent then it is imaginable. All anonymous, cretinous things are demulcent. Serene is observed.", "logic": "\nImaginable(pammy)\nCretinous(corry)\nAnonymous(serene)\nforall x (Imaginable(x) and Demulcent(x) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Cretinous(x) -> Anonymous(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) and Cretinous(x) -> Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) and Observed(x) -> Cretinous(x))\nforall x (Demulcent(x) -> Imaginable(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) and Cretinous(x) -> Demulcent(x))\n\nObserved(serene)\n\nObserved(serene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Carolan is juridic. Jessalyn is tomentose. Raimund is supportive. Rough, evocative things are thankless. All tomentose things are supportive. White, tomentose things are evocative. If something is asunder and idiomatic then it is tomentose. If something is evocative then it is juridic. All supportive, tomentose things are evocative. Raimund is not asunder.", "logic": "\nJuridic(carolan)\nTomentose(jessalyn)\nSupportive(raimund)\nforall x (Juridic(x) and Evocative(x) -> Thankless(x))\nforall x (Tomentose(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Asunder(x) and Tomentose(x) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Asunder(x) and Idiomatic(x) -> Tomentose(x))\nforall x (Evocative(x) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) and Tomentose(x) -> Evocative(x))\n\nnot Asunder(raimund)\n\nnot Asunder(raimund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Alasdair is calculable. Marya is wishful. Olaf is profligate. Rough, arachnoid things are deserted. All wishful things are profligate. White, wishful things are arachnoid. If something is elfish and tainted then it is wishful. If something is arachnoid then it is calculable. All profligate, wishful things are arachnoid. Marya is tainted.", "logic": "\nCalculable(alasdair)\nWishful(marya)\nProfligate(olaf)\nforall x (Calculable(x) and Arachnoid(x) -> Deserted(x))\nforall x (Wishful(x) -> Profligate(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) and Wishful(x) -> Arachnoid(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) and Tainted(x) -> Wishful(x))\nforall x (Arachnoid(x) -> Calculable(x))\nforall x (Profligate(x) and Wishful(x) -> Arachnoid(x))\n\nTainted(marya)\n\nTainted(marya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Feliza is mesmeric. Chance is tentacular. Chance is mesmeric. Babara is puritanic. Gwen is unmoved. Gwen is not capitular. Gwen is choppy. Kind people are unmoved. If someone is tentacular then they are unmoved. If someone is tentacular then they are unmoved. All unmoved people are mesmeric. If Babara is not unmoved and Babara is not tentacular then Babara is activistic. If someone is tentacular and not mesmeric then they are activistic. Red people are activistic. If someone is mesmeric then they are not activistic. Chance is mesmeric.", "logic": "\nMesmeric(feliza)\nTentacular(chance)\nMesmeric(chance)\nPuritanic(babara)\nUnmoved(gwen)\nnot Capitular(gwen)\nChoppy(gwen)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Tentacular(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Tentacular(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Unmoved(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nnot Unmoved(babara) and not Tentacular(babara) -> Activistic(babara)\nforall x (Tentacular(x) and not Mesmeric(x) -> Activistic(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> Activistic(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) -> not Activistic(x))\n\nMesmeric(chance)\n\ntherefore Mesmeric(chance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Mallory is fallible. Melisa is subaqueous. Melisa is fallible. Mic is palish. Halie is negroid. Halie is not clear. Halie is softish. Kind people are negroid. If someone is subaqueous then they are negroid. If someone is subaqueous then they are negroid. All negroid people are fallible. If Mic is not negroid and Mic is not subaqueous then Mic is needled. If someone is subaqueous and not fallible then they are needled. Red people are needled. If someone is fallible then they are not needled. Melisa is not subaqueous.", "logic": "\nFallible(mallory)\nSubaqueous(melisa)\nFallible(melisa)\nPalish(mic)\nNegroid(halie)\nnot Clear(halie)\nSoftish(halie)\nforall x (Palish(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Negroid(x) -> Fallible(x))\nnot Negroid(mic) and not Subaqueous(mic) -> Needled(mic)\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) and not Fallible(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> not Needled(x))\n\nnot Subaqueous(melisa)\n\ntherefore Subaqueous(melisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Jayme is lowering. Ariadne is foetid. Ariadne is lowering. Nicki is unsold. Karisa is moroccan. Karisa is not stretchy. Karisa is dickey. Kind people are moroccan. If someone is foetid then they are moroccan. If someone is foetid then they are moroccan. All moroccan people are lowering. If Nicki is not moroccan and Nicki is not foetid then Nicki is autolytic. If someone is foetid and not lowering then they are autolytic. Red people are autolytic. If someone is lowering then they are not autolytic. Karisa is lowering.", "logic": "\nLowering(jayme)\nFoetid(ariadne)\nLowering(ariadne)\nUnsold(nicki)\nMoroccan(karisa)\nnot Stretchy(karisa)\nDickey(karisa)\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Foetid(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Foetid(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Lowering(x))\nnot Moroccan(nicki) and not Foetid(nicki) -> Autolytic(nicki)\nforall x (Foetid(x) and not Lowering(x) -> Autolytic(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Autolytic(x))\nforall x (Lowering(x) -> not Autolytic(x))\n\nLowering(karisa)\n\nMoroccan(karisa) and forall x (Moroccan(x) -> Lowering(x)) -> therefore Lowering(karisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Darin is caprine. Anjanette is ankylotic. Anjanette is caprine. Wendel is automatic. Torrance is nurtural. Torrance is not sciolistic. Torrance is graceful. Kind people are nurtural. If someone is ankylotic then they are nurtural. If someone is ankylotic then they are nurtural. All nurtural people are caprine. If Wendel is not nurtural and Wendel is not ankylotic then Wendel is windswept. If someone is ankylotic and not caprine then they are windswept. Red people are windswept. If someone is caprine then they are not windswept. Darin is windswept.", "logic": "\nCaprine(darin)\nAnkylotic(anjanette)\nCaprine(anjanette)\nAutomatic(wendel)\nNurtural(torrance)\nnot Sciolistic(torrance)\nGraceful(torrance)\nforall x (Automatic(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Nurtural(x) -> Caprine(x))\nnot Nurtural(wendel) and not Ankylotic(wendel) -> Windswept(wendel)\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) and not Caprine(x) -> Windswept(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) -> Windswept(x))\nforall x (Caprine(x) -> not Windswept(x))\n\nWindswept(darin)\n\nCaprine(darin) and forall x (Caprine(x) -> not Windswept(x)) -> therefore not Windswept(darin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Clemmie is boney. Natassia is simulated. Natassia is boney. Amalie is visceral. Dona is crosswise. Dona is not pessimum. Dona is softish. Kind people are crosswise. If someone is simulated then they are crosswise. If someone is simulated then they are crosswise. All crosswise people are boney. If Amalie is not crosswise and Amalie is not simulated then Amalie is frore. If someone is simulated and not boney then they are frore. Red people are frore. If someone is boney then they are not frore. Dona is not frore.", "logic": "\nBoney(clemmie)\nSimulated(natassia)\nBoney(natassia)\nVisceral(amalie)\nCrosswise(dona)\nnot Pessimum(dona)\nSoftish(dona)\nforall x (Visceral(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) -> Boney(x))\nnot Crosswise(amalie) and not Simulated(amalie) -> Frore(amalie)\nforall x (Simulated(x) and not Boney(x) -> Frore(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Frore(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> not Frore(x))\n\nnot Frore(dona)\n\nCrosswise(dona) and forall x (Crosswise(x) -> Boney(x)) -> therefore Boney(dona) Boney(dona) and forall x (Boney(x) -> not Frore(x)) -> therefore not Frore(dona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Hester is torturing. Gill is daring. Gill is torturing. Melissa is pianissimo. Charlena is putative. Charlena is not despiteful. Charlena is straw. Kind people are putative. If someone is daring then they are putative. If someone is daring then they are putative. All putative people are torturing. If Melissa is not putative and Melissa is not daring then Melissa is strung. If someone is daring and not torturing then they are strung. Red people are strung. If someone is torturing then they are not strung. Melissa is not torturing.", "logic": "\nTorturing(hester)\nDaring(gill)\nTorturing(gill)\nPianissimo(melissa)\nPutative(charlena)\nnot Despiteful(charlena)\nStraw(charlena)\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Putative(x))\nforall x (Daring(x) -> Putative(x))\nforall x (Daring(x) -> Putative(x))\nforall x (Putative(x) -> Torturing(x))\nnot Putative(melissa) and not Daring(melissa) -> Strung(melissa)\nforall x (Daring(x) and not Torturing(x) -> Strung(x))\nforall x (Despiteful(x) -> Strung(x))\nforall x (Torturing(x) -> not Strung(x))\n\nnot Torturing(melissa)\n\nPianissimo(melissa) and forall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Putative(x)) -> therefore Putative(melissa) Putative(melissa) and forall x (Putative(x) -> Torturing(x)) -> therefore Torturing(melissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Cora is elegiac. Malkah is onstage. Malkah is elegiac. Hamnet is oblivious. Issi is sixteenth. Issi is not surprised. Issi is surd. Kind people are sixteenth. If someone is onstage then they are sixteenth. If someone is onstage then they are sixteenth. All sixteenth people are elegiac. If Hamnet is not sixteenth and Hamnet is not onstage then Hamnet is lyric. If someone is onstage and not elegiac then they are lyric. Red people are lyric. If someone is elegiac then they are not lyric. Hamnet is not lyric.", "logic": "\nElegiac(cora)\nOnstage(malkah)\nElegiac(malkah)\nOblivious(hamnet)\nSixteenth(issi)\nnot Surprised(issi)\nSurd(issi)\nforall x (Oblivious(x) -> Sixteenth(x))\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Sixteenth(x))\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Sixteenth(x))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) -> Elegiac(x))\nnot Sixteenth(hamnet) and not Onstage(hamnet) -> Lyric(hamnet)\nforall x (Onstage(x) and not Elegiac(x) -> Lyric(x))\nforall x (Surprised(x) -> Lyric(x))\nforall x (Elegiac(x) -> not Lyric(x))\n\nnot Lyric(hamnet)\n\nOblivious(hamnet) and forall x (Oblivious(x) -> Sixteenth(x)) -> therefore Sixteenth(hamnet) Sixteenth(hamnet) and forall x (Sixteenth(x) -> Elegiac(x)) -> therefore Elegiac(hamnet) Elegiac(hamnet) and forall x (Elegiac(x) -> not Lyric(x)) -> therefore not Lyric(hamnet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Gino is eventual. Upton is poached. Upton is eventual. Felicle is degraded. Fidela is starving. Fidela is not restful. Fidela is harmful. Kind people are starving. If someone is poached then they are starving. If someone is poached then they are starving. All starving people are eventual. If Felicle is not starving and Felicle is not poached then Felicle is baked. If someone is poached and not eventual then they are baked. Red people are baked. If someone is eventual then they are not baked. Felicle is baked.", "logic": "\nEventual(gino)\nPoached(upton)\nEventual(upton)\nDegraded(felicle)\nStarving(fidela)\nnot Restful(fidela)\nHarmful(fidela)\nforall x (Degraded(x) -> Starving(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) -> Starving(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) -> Starving(x))\nforall x (Starving(x) -> Eventual(x))\nnot Starving(felicle) and not Poached(felicle) -> Baked(felicle)\nforall x (Poached(x) and not Eventual(x) -> Baked(x))\nforall x (Restful(x) -> Baked(x))\nforall x (Eventual(x) -> not Baked(x))\n\nBaked(felicle)\n\nDegraded(felicle) and forall x (Degraded(x) -> Starving(x)) -> therefore Starving(felicle) Starving(felicle) and forall x (Starving(x) -> Eventual(x)) -> therefore Eventual(felicle) Eventual(felicle) and forall x (Eventual(x) -> not Baked(x)) -> therefore not Baked(felicle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Marcio is highborn. Jory is anonymous. Jory is highborn. Ivan is bacillar. Jeremiah is mishnaic. Jeremiah is not bifacial. Jeremiah is nameless. Kind people are mishnaic. If someone is anonymous then they are mishnaic. If someone is anonymous then they are mishnaic. All mishnaic people are highborn. If Ivan is not mishnaic and Ivan is not anonymous then Ivan is squishy. If someone is anonymous and not highborn then they are squishy. Red people are squishy. If someone is highborn then they are not squishy. Marcio is not mishnaic.", "logic": "\nHighborn(marcio)\nAnonymous(jory)\nHighborn(jory)\nBacillar(ivan)\nMishnaic(jeremiah)\nnot Bifacial(jeremiah)\nNameless(jeremiah)\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Highborn(x))\nnot Mishnaic(ivan) and not Anonymous(ivan) -> Squishy(ivan)\nforall x (Anonymous(x) and not Highborn(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Highborn(x) -> not Squishy(x))\n\nnot Mishnaic(marcio)\n\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Mishnaic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Janie is earnest. Hershel is scurfy. Hershel is earnest. Kacie is anabatic. Ruthi is axillary. Ruthi is not hardcore. Ruthi is loveable. Kind people are axillary. If someone is scurfy then they are axillary. If someone is scurfy then they are axillary. All axillary people are earnest. If Kacie is not axillary and Kacie is not scurfy then Kacie is sapless. If someone is scurfy and not earnest then they are sapless. Red people are sapless. If someone is earnest then they are not sapless. Janie is anabatic.", "logic": "\nEarnest(janie)\nScurfy(hershel)\nEarnest(hershel)\nAnabatic(kacie)\nAxillary(ruthi)\nnot Hardcore(ruthi)\nLoveable(ruthi)\nforall x (Anabatic(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Axillary(x) -> Earnest(x))\nnot Axillary(kacie) and not Scurfy(kacie) -> Sapless(kacie)\nforall x (Scurfy(x) and not Earnest(x) -> Sapless(x))\nforall x (Hardcore(x) -> Sapless(x))\nforall x (Earnest(x) -> not Sapless(x))\n\nAnabatic(janie)\n\nAnabatic(janie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Nerita is splitting. Hedy is heartening. Hedy is splitting. Caroleen is russian. Chelsae is artistic. Chelsae is not montane. Chelsae is exact. Kind people are artistic. If someone is heartening then they are artistic. If someone is heartening then they are artistic. All artistic people are splitting. If Caroleen is not artistic and Caroleen is not heartening then Caroleen is mythic. If someone is heartening and not splitting then they are mythic. Red people are mythic. If someone is splitting then they are not mythic. Nerita is not heartening.", "logic": "\nSplitting(nerita)\nHeartening(hedy)\nSplitting(hedy)\nRussian(caroleen)\nArtistic(chelsae)\nnot Montane(chelsae)\nExact(chelsae)\nforall x (Russian(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Artistic(x) -> Splitting(x))\nnot Artistic(caroleen) and not Heartening(caroleen) -> Mythic(caroleen)\nforall x (Heartening(x) and not Splitting(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Montane(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Splitting(x) -> not Mythic(x))\n\nnot Heartening(nerita)\n\nnot Heartening(nerita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Corabella is sidearm. Olva is propulsive. Olva is sidearm. Ramon is pediatric. Silvie is unlogical. Silvie is not stately. Silvie is bobtail. Kind people are unlogical. If someone is propulsive then they are unlogical. If someone is propulsive then they are unlogical. All unlogical people are sidearm. If Ramon is not unlogical and Ramon is not propulsive then Ramon is invalid. If someone is propulsive and not sidearm then they are invalid. Red people are invalid. If someone is sidearm then they are not invalid. Corabella is bobtail.", "logic": "\nSidearm(corabella)\nPropulsive(olva)\nSidearm(olva)\nPediatric(ramon)\nUnlogical(silvie)\nnot Stately(silvie)\nBobtail(silvie)\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nnot Unlogical(ramon) and not Propulsive(ramon) -> Invalid(ramon)\nforall x (Propulsive(x) and not Sidearm(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Stately(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Sidearm(x) -> not Invalid(x))\n\nBobtail(corabella)\n\nBobtail(corabella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Lucien is inverse. Bev is pliable. Bev is inverse. Valaria is marbleized. Rosamond is yeasty. Rosamond is not soaked. Rosamond is antiviral. Kind people are yeasty. If someone is pliable then they are yeasty. If someone is pliable then they are yeasty. All yeasty people are inverse. If Valaria is not yeasty and Valaria is not pliable then Valaria is unstrained. If someone is pliable and not inverse then they are unstrained. Red people are unstrained. If someone is inverse then they are not unstrained. Valaria is not antiviral.", "logic": "\nInverse(lucien)\nPliable(bev)\nInverse(bev)\nMarbleized(valaria)\nYeasty(rosamond)\nnot Soaked(rosamond)\nAntiviral(rosamond)\nforall x (Marbleized(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Pliable(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Pliable(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Inverse(x))\nnot Yeasty(valaria) and not Pliable(valaria) -> Unstrained(valaria)\nforall x (Pliable(x) and not Inverse(x) -> Unstrained(x))\nforall x (Soaked(x) -> Unstrained(x))\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> not Unstrained(x))\n\nnot Antiviral(valaria)\n\nnot Antiviral(valaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Zelma is dished. Vernon is tantamount. Vernon is dished. Chloe is viricidal. Cacilia is pharyngeal. Cacilia is not fenestral. Cacilia is sourish. Kind people are pharyngeal. If someone is tantamount then they are pharyngeal. If someone is tantamount then they are pharyngeal. All pharyngeal people are dished. If Chloe is not pharyngeal and Chloe is not tantamount then Chloe is incestuous. If someone is tantamount and not dished then they are incestuous. Red people are incestuous. If someone is dished then they are not incestuous. Cacilia is tantamount.", "logic": "\nDished(zelma)\nTantamount(vernon)\nDished(vernon)\nViricidal(chloe)\nPharyngeal(cacilia)\nnot Fenestral(cacilia)\nSourish(cacilia)\nforall x (Viricidal(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Tantamount(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Tantamount(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) -> Dished(x))\nnot Pharyngeal(chloe) and not Tantamount(chloe) -> Incestuous(chloe)\nforall x (Tantamount(x) and not Dished(x) -> Incestuous(x))\nforall x (Fenestral(x) -> Incestuous(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) -> not Incestuous(x))\n\nTantamount(cacilia)\n\nTantamount(cacilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Trixi is prudential. Joni is assertable. Joni is prudential. Martin is virtuoso. Garfinkel is deckled. Garfinkel is not concluded. Garfinkel is worshipful. Kind people are deckled. If someone is assertable then they are deckled. If someone is assertable then they are deckled. All deckled people are prudential. If Martin is not deckled and Martin is not assertable then Martin is roadless. If someone is assertable and not prudential then they are roadless. Red people are roadless. If someone is prudential then they are not roadless. Joni is not virtuoso.", "logic": "\nPrudential(trixi)\nAssertable(joni)\nPrudential(joni)\nVirtuoso(martin)\nDeckled(garfinkel)\nnot Concluded(garfinkel)\nWorshipful(garfinkel)\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Prudential(x))\nnot Deckled(martin) and not Assertable(martin) -> Roadless(martin)\nforall x (Assertable(x) and not Prudential(x) -> Roadless(x))\nforall x (Concluded(x) -> Roadless(x))\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> not Roadless(x))\n\nnot Virtuoso(joni)\n\nnot Virtuoso(joni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Orelia is carmine. Linette is kosher. Linette is carmine. Allen is unsought. Wolfy is noncyclic. Wolfy is not orbitual. Wolfy is winding. Kind people are noncyclic. If someone is kosher then they are noncyclic. If someone is kosher then they are noncyclic. All noncyclic people are carmine. If Allen is not noncyclic and Allen is not kosher then Allen is agonized. If someone is kosher and not carmine then they are agonized. Red people are agonized. If someone is carmine then they are not agonized. Wolfy is unsought.", "logic": "\nCarmine(orelia)\nKosher(linette)\nCarmine(linette)\nUnsought(allen)\nNoncyclic(wolfy)\nnot Orbitual(wolfy)\nWinding(wolfy)\nforall x (Unsought(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Carmine(x))\nnot Noncyclic(allen) and not Kosher(allen) -> Agonized(allen)\nforall x (Kosher(x) and not Carmine(x) -> Agonized(x))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Agonized(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> not Agonized(x))\n\nUnsought(wolfy)\n\nUnsought(wolfy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Obie is tortious. Obie is timorous. Obie is unshaped. Obie is antiphonal. Ahmad is statute. Ahmad is dressed. Arlana is tortious. Arlana is dressed. Arlana is timorous. Arlana is antiphonal. If something is antiphonal then it is unshaped. All atheist things are antiphonal. Kind, statute things are atheist. Obie is unshaped.", "logic": "\nTortious(obie)\nTimorous(obie)\nUnshaped(obie)\nAntiphonal(obie)\nStatute(ahmad)\nDressed(ahmad)\nTortious(arlana)\nDressed(arlana)\nTimorous(arlana)\nAntiphonal(arlana)\nforall x (Antiphonal(x) -> Unshaped(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nforall x (Dressed(x) and Statute(x) -> Atheist(x))\n\nUnshaped(obie)\n\ntherefore Unshaped(obie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Derrin is uncouth. Derrin is jittery. Derrin is biotic. Derrin is figural. Adore is wheelless. Adore is brinded. Coralyn is uncouth. Coralyn is brinded. Coralyn is jittery. Coralyn is figural. If something is figural then it is biotic. All penal things are figural. Kind, wheelless things are penal. Derrin is not figural.", "logic": "\nUncouth(derrin)\nJittery(derrin)\nBiotic(derrin)\nFigural(derrin)\nWheelless(adore)\nBrinded(adore)\nUncouth(coralyn)\nBrinded(coralyn)\nJittery(coralyn)\nFigural(coralyn)\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Biotic(x))\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Figural(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) and Wheelless(x) -> Penal(x))\n\nnot Figural(derrin)\n\ntherefore Figural(derrin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Denyse is vibrionic. Denyse is classified. Denyse is advisable. Denyse is blae. Bjorn is garmented. Bjorn is sizzling. Bobbie is vibrionic. Bobbie is sizzling. Bobbie is classified. Bobbie is blae. If something is blae then it is advisable. All intestate things are blae. Kind, garmented things are intestate. Bobbie is advisable.", "logic": "\nVibrionic(denyse)\nClassified(denyse)\nAdvisable(denyse)\nBlae(denyse)\nGarmented(bjorn)\nSizzling(bjorn)\nVibrionic(bobbie)\nSizzling(bobbie)\nClassified(bobbie)\nBlae(bobbie)\nforall x (Blae(x) -> Advisable(x))\nforall x (Intestate(x) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Sizzling(x) and Garmented(x) -> Intestate(x))\n\nAdvisable(bobbie)\n\nBlae(bobbie) and forall x (Blae(x) -> Advisable(x)) -> therefore Advisable(bobbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Kerri is arid. Kerri is sizable. Kerri is parisian. Kerri is metal. Eugene is practised. Eugene is andalusian. Ugo is arid. Ugo is andalusian. Ugo is sizable. Ugo is metal. If something is metal then it is parisian. All fiery things are metal. Kind, practised things are fiery. Eugene is not fiery.", "logic": "\nArid(kerri)\nSizable(kerri)\nParisian(kerri)\nMetal(kerri)\nPractised(eugene)\nAndalusian(eugene)\nArid(ugo)\nAndalusian(ugo)\nSizable(ugo)\nMetal(ugo)\nforall x (Metal(x) -> Parisian(x))\nforall x (Fiery(x) -> Metal(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Practised(x) -> Fiery(x))\n\nnot Fiery(eugene)\n\nAndalusian(eugene) and Practised(eugene) and forall x (Andalusian(x) and Practised(x) -> Fiery(x)) -> therefore Fiery(eugene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Wilow is detergent. Wilow is excited. Wilow is silvan. Wilow is atrophied. Felix is silvan. Felix is racial. Kermie is detergent. Kermie is racial. Kermie is excited. Kermie is atrophied. If something is atrophied then it is silvan. All interred things are atrophied. Kind, silvan things are interred. Felix is atrophied.", "logic": "\nDetergent(wilow)\nExcited(wilow)\nSilvan(wilow)\nAtrophied(wilow)\nSilvan(felix)\nRacial(felix)\nDetergent(kermie)\nRacial(kermie)\nExcited(kermie)\nAtrophied(kermie)\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Interred(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Racial(x) and Silvan(x) -> Interred(x))\n\nAtrophied(felix)\n\nRacial(felix) and Silvan(felix) and forall x (Racial(x) and Silvan(x) -> Interred(x)) -> therefore Interred(felix) Interred(felix) and forall x (Interred(x) -> Atrophied(x)) -> therefore Atrophied(felix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Marney is learned. Marney is spinose. Marney is troubled. Marney is bandaged. Allene is narrowed. Allene is hiplength. Monah is learned. Monah is hiplength. Monah is spinose. Monah is bandaged. If something is bandaged then it is troubled. All unionised things are bandaged. Kind, narrowed things are unionised. Allene is not bandaged.", "logic": "\nLearned(marney)\nSpinose(marney)\nTroubled(marney)\nBandaged(marney)\nNarrowed(allene)\nHiplength(allene)\nLearned(monah)\nHiplength(monah)\nSpinose(monah)\nBandaged(monah)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Troubled(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Hiplength(x) and Narrowed(x) -> Unionised(x))\n\nnot Bandaged(allene)\n\nHiplength(allene) and Narrowed(allene) and forall x (Hiplength(x) and Narrowed(x) -> Unionised(x)) -> therefore Unionised(allene) Unionised(allene) and forall x (Unionised(x) -> Bandaged(x)) -> therefore Bandaged(allene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Gavra is dismissed. Gavra is levorotary. Gavra is smelly. Gavra is charitable. Leyla is streetwise. Leyla is pandemic. Webb is dismissed. Webb is pandemic. Webb is levorotary. Webb is charitable. If something is charitable then it is smelly. All apomictic things are charitable. Kind, streetwise things are apomictic. Leyla is smelly.", "logic": "\nDismissed(gavra)\nLevorotary(gavra)\nSmelly(gavra)\nCharitable(gavra)\nStreetwise(leyla)\nPandemic(leyla)\nDismissed(webb)\nPandemic(webb)\nLevorotary(webb)\nCharitable(webb)\nforall x (Charitable(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) -> Charitable(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) and Streetwise(x) -> Apomictic(x))\n\nSmelly(leyla)\n\nPandemic(leyla) and Streetwise(leyla) and forall x (Pandemic(x) and Streetwise(x) -> Apomictic(x)) -> therefore Apomictic(leyla) Apomictic(leyla) and forall x (Apomictic(x) -> Charitable(x)) -> therefore Charitable(leyla) Charitable(leyla) and forall x (Charitable(x) -> Smelly(x)) -> therefore Smelly(leyla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Livia is ischemic. Livia is clastic. Livia is kindly. Livia is nonthermal. Clare is unlovable. Clare is unlucky. Natalie is ischemic. Natalie is unlucky. Natalie is clastic. Natalie is nonthermal. If something is nonthermal then it is kindly. All precast things are nonthermal. Kind, unlovable things are precast. Clare is not kindly.", "logic": "\nIschemic(livia)\nClastic(livia)\nKindly(livia)\nNonthermal(livia)\nUnlovable(clare)\nUnlucky(clare)\nIschemic(natalie)\nUnlucky(natalie)\nClastic(natalie)\nNonthermal(natalie)\nforall x (Nonthermal(x) -> Kindly(x))\nforall x (Precast(x) -> Nonthermal(x))\nforall x (Unlucky(x) and Unlovable(x) -> Precast(x))\n\nnot Kindly(clare)\n\nUnlucky(clare) and Unlovable(clare) and forall x (Unlucky(x) and Unlovable(x) -> Precast(x)) -> therefore Precast(clare) Precast(clare) and forall x (Precast(x) -> Nonthermal(x)) -> therefore Nonthermal(clare) Nonthermal(clare) and forall x (Nonthermal(x) -> Kindly(x)) -> therefore Kindly(clare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Lydie is salientian. Lydie is pedigree. Lydie is lxxvii. Lydie is dovish. Cathy is buckram. Cathy is satisfying. Emogene is salientian. Emogene is satisfying. Emogene is pedigree. Emogene is dovish. If something is dovish then it is lxxvii. All uneconomic things are dovish. Kind, buckram things are uneconomic. Lydie is not uneconomic.", "logic": "\nSalientian(lydie)\nPedigree(lydie)\nLxxvii(lydie)\nDovish(lydie)\nBuckram(cathy)\nSatisfying(cathy)\nSalientian(emogene)\nSatisfying(emogene)\nPedigree(emogene)\nDovish(emogene)\nforall x (Dovish(x) -> Lxxvii(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Satisfying(x) and Buckram(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\n\nnot Uneconomic(lydie)\n\nforall x (Satisfying(x) and Buckram(x) -> Uneconomic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Blaire is peachy. Blaire is parturient. Blaire is speckled. Blaire is operculate. Arda is imminent. Arda is bleached. Tawnya is peachy. Tawnya is bleached. Tawnya is parturient. Tawnya is operculate. If something is operculate then it is speckled. All accoutered things are operculate. Kind, imminent things are accoutered. Tawnya is accoutered.", "logic": "\nPeachy(blaire)\nParturient(blaire)\nSpeckled(blaire)\nOperculate(blaire)\nImminent(arda)\nBleached(arda)\nPeachy(tawnya)\nBleached(tawnya)\nParturient(tawnya)\nOperculate(tawnya)\nforall x (Operculate(x) -> Speckled(x))\nforall x (Accoutered(x) -> Operculate(x))\nforall x (Bleached(x) and Imminent(x) -> Accoutered(x))\n\nAccoutered(tawnya)\n\nforall x (Bleached(x) and Imminent(x) -> Accoutered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Milt is tempering. Milt is mercenary. Milt is billion. Milt is provoked. Sibelle is skewed. Sibelle is renegade. Orin is tempering. Orin is renegade. Orin is mercenary. Orin is provoked. If something is provoked then it is billion. All fossil things are provoked. Kind, skewed things are fossil. Orin is not skewed.", "logic": "\nTempering(milt)\nMercenary(milt)\nBillion(milt)\nProvoked(milt)\nSkewed(sibelle)\nRenegade(sibelle)\nTempering(orin)\nRenegade(orin)\nMercenary(orin)\nProvoked(orin)\nforall x (Provoked(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Fossil(x) -> Provoked(x))\nforall x (Renegade(x) and Skewed(x) -> Fossil(x))\n\nnot Skewed(orin)\n\nnot Skewed(orin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Neal is intoned. Neal is unseamed. Neal is snarled. Neal is wrinkly. Tallie is assamese. Tallie is five. Fenelia is intoned. Fenelia is five. Fenelia is unseamed. Fenelia is wrinkly. If something is wrinkly then it is snarled. All satanic things are wrinkly. Kind, assamese things are satanic. Neal is five.", "logic": "\nIntoned(neal)\nUnseamed(neal)\nSnarled(neal)\nWrinkly(neal)\nAssamese(tallie)\nFive(tallie)\nIntoned(fenelia)\nFive(fenelia)\nUnseamed(fenelia)\nWrinkly(fenelia)\nforall x (Wrinkly(x) -> Snarled(x))\nforall x (Satanic(x) -> Wrinkly(x))\nforall x (Five(x) and Assamese(x) -> Satanic(x))\n\nFive(neal)\n\nFive(neal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Delphinia is clxxx. Delphinia is randomised. Delphinia is herculean. Delphinia is egyptian. Torrance is serene. Torrance is scabby. Janka is clxxx. Janka is scabby. Janka is randomised. Janka is egyptian. If something is egyptian then it is herculean. All shrivelled things are egyptian. Kind, serene things are shrivelled. Torrance is not clxxx.", "logic": "\nClxxx(delphinia)\nRandomised(delphinia)\nHerculean(delphinia)\nEgyptian(delphinia)\nSerene(torrance)\nScabby(torrance)\nClxxx(janka)\nScabby(janka)\nRandomised(janka)\nEgyptian(janka)\nforall x (Egyptian(x) -> Herculean(x))\nforall x (Shrivelled(x) -> Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Scabby(x) and Serene(x) -> Shrivelled(x))\n\nnot Clxxx(torrance)\n\nnot Clxxx(torrance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Audrye is unbroken. Audrye is maddening. Audrye is unicameral. Audrye is unsoured. Broddie is maimed. Broddie is cuspate. Julio is unbroken. Julio is cuspate. Julio is maddening. Julio is unsoured. If something is unsoured then it is unicameral. All xiii things are unsoured. Kind, maimed things are xiii. Audrye is maimed.", "logic": "\nUnbroken(audrye)\nMaddening(audrye)\nUnicameral(audrye)\nUnsoured(audrye)\nMaimed(broddie)\nCuspate(broddie)\nUnbroken(julio)\nCuspate(julio)\nMaddening(julio)\nUnsoured(julio)\nforall x (Unsoured(x) -> Unicameral(x))\nforall x (Xiii(x) -> Unsoured(x))\nforall x (Cuspate(x) and Maimed(x) -> Xiii(x))\n\nMaimed(audrye)\n\nMaimed(audrye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "The danella does not see the silvana. The joana drape the danella. The joana drape the silvana. The joana is striking. The joana tyrannize the danella. The joana does not see the carina. The silvana tyrannize the carina. The silvana ascertain the carina. The carina does not chase the silvana. The carina is striking. The carina is not scorned. The carina tyrannize the silvana. If the joana tyrannize the danella and the danella tyrannize the joana then the danella is not striking. If the danella ascertain the silvana then the danella ascertain the carina. If something is confiscate and it ascertain the danella then the danella does not visit the carina. If the danella does not see the silvana then the danella ascertain the silvana. If something is loverly and it drape the carina then it does not chase the danella. If something ascertain the carina then the carina ascertain the joana. If the joana is lysogenic and the joana is not striking then the joana tyrannize the carina. If something ascertain the carina and the carina ascertain the joana then it tyrannize the danella. The carina tyrannize the silvana.", "logic": "\nnot Tyrannize(danella, silvana)\nDrape(joana, danella)\nDrape(joana, silvana)\nStriking(joana)\nTyrannize(joana, danella)\nnot Tyrannize(joana, carina)\nTyrannize(silvana, carina)\nAscertain(silvana, carina)\nnot Drape(carina, silvana)\nStriking(carina)\nnot Scorned(carina)\nTyrannize(carina, silvana)\nTyrannize(joana, danella) and Tyrannize(danella, joana) -> not Striking(danella)\nAscertain(danella, silvana) -> Ascertain(danella, carina)\nforall x (Confiscate(x) and Ascertain(x, danella) -> not Ascertain(danella, carina))\nnot Tyrannize(danella, silvana) -> Ascertain(danella, silvana)\nforall x (Loverly(x) and Drape(x, carina) -> not Drape(x, danella))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, carina) -> Ascertain(carina, joana))\nLysogenic(joana) and not Striking(joana) -> Tyrannize(joana, carina)\nforall x (Ascertain(x, carina) and Ascertain(carina, joana) -> Tyrannize(x, danella))\n\nTyrannize(carina, silvana)\n\ntherefore Tyrannize(carina, silvana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The ash does not see the emile. The mattias fagot the ash. The mattias fagot the emile. The mattias is speckless. The mattias quilt the ash. The mattias does not see the terrye. The emile quilt the terrye. The emile recombine the terrye. The terrye does not chase the emile. The terrye is speckless. The terrye is not dogmatic. The terrye quilt the emile. If the mattias quilt the ash and the ash quilt the mattias then the ash is not speckless. If the ash recombine the emile then the ash recombine the terrye. If something is estranging and it recombine the ash then the ash does not visit the terrye. If the ash does not see the emile then the ash recombine the emile. If something is useable and it fagot the terrye then it does not chase the ash. If something recombine the terrye then the terrye recombine the mattias. If the mattias is urbanized and the mattias is not speckless then the mattias quilt the terrye. If something recombine the terrye and the terrye recombine the mattias then it quilt the ash. The mattias does not see the ash.", "logic": "\nnot Quilt(ash, emile)\nFagot(mattias, ash)\nFagot(mattias, emile)\nSpeckless(mattias)\nQuilt(mattias, ash)\nnot Quilt(mattias, terrye)\nQuilt(emile, terrye)\nRecombine(emile, terrye)\nnot Fagot(terrye, emile)\nSpeckless(terrye)\nnot Dogmatic(terrye)\nQuilt(terrye, emile)\nQuilt(mattias, ash) and Quilt(ash, mattias) -> not Speckless(ash)\nRecombine(ash, emile) -> Recombine(ash, terrye)\nforall x (Estranging(x) and Recombine(x, ash) -> not Recombine(ash, terrye))\nnot Quilt(ash, emile) -> Recombine(ash, emile)\nforall x (Useable(x) and Fagot(x, terrye) -> not Fagot(x, ash))\nforall x (Recombine(x, terrye) -> Recombine(terrye, mattias))\nUrbanized(mattias) and not Speckless(mattias) -> Quilt(mattias, terrye)\nforall x (Recombine(x, terrye) and Recombine(terrye, mattias) -> Quilt(x, ash))\n\nnot Quilt(mattias, ash)\n\ntherefore Quilt(mattias, ash)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The diego does not see the raymond. The evangelia gnash the diego. The evangelia gnash the raymond. The evangelia is wizard. The evangelia cyclostyle the diego. The evangelia does not see the randee. The raymond cyclostyle the randee. The raymond reunite the randee. The randee does not chase the raymond. The randee is wizard. The randee is not blindfold. The randee cyclostyle the raymond. If the evangelia cyclostyle the diego and the diego cyclostyle the evangelia then the diego is not wizard. If the diego reunite the raymond then the diego reunite the randee. If something is unselected and it reunite the diego then the diego does not visit the randee. If the diego does not see the raymond then the diego reunite the raymond. If something is stylised and it gnash the randee then it does not chase the diego. If something reunite the randee then the randee reunite the evangelia. If the evangelia is humble and the evangelia is not wizard then the evangelia cyclostyle the randee. If something reunite the randee and the randee reunite the evangelia then it cyclostyle the diego. The randee reunite the evangelia.", "logic": "\nnot Cyclostyle(diego, raymond)\nGnash(evangelia, diego)\nGnash(evangelia, raymond)\nWizard(evangelia)\nCyclostyle(evangelia, diego)\nnot Cyclostyle(evangelia, randee)\nCyclostyle(raymond, randee)\nReunite(raymond, randee)\nnot Gnash(randee, raymond)\nWizard(randee)\nnot Blindfold(randee)\nCyclostyle(randee, raymond)\nCyclostyle(evangelia, diego) and Cyclostyle(diego, evangelia) -> not Wizard(diego)\nReunite(diego, raymond) -> Reunite(diego, randee)\nforall x (Unselected(x) and Reunite(x, diego) -> not Reunite(diego, randee))\nnot Cyclostyle(diego, raymond) -> Reunite(diego, raymond)\nforall x (Stylised(x) and Gnash(x, randee) -> not Gnash(x, diego))\nforall x (Reunite(x, randee) -> Reunite(randee, evangelia))\nHumble(evangelia) and not Wizard(evangelia) -> Cyclostyle(evangelia, randee)\nforall x (Reunite(x, randee) and Reunite(randee, evangelia) -> Cyclostyle(x, diego))\n\nReunite(randee, evangelia)\n\nReunite(raymond, randee) and forall x (Reunite(x, randee) -> Reunite(randee, evangelia)) -> therefore Reunite(randee, evangelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The ellene does not see the rad. The trent undermine the ellene. The trent undermine the rad. The trent is aldermanly. The trent dangle the ellene. The trent does not see the elene. The rad dangle the elene. The rad unite the elene. The elene does not chase the rad. The elene is aldermanly. The elene is not cursorial. The elene dangle the rad. If the trent dangle the ellene and the ellene dangle the trent then the ellene is not aldermanly. If the ellene unite the rad then the ellene unite the elene. If something is imprudent and it unite the ellene then the ellene does not visit the elene. If the ellene does not see the rad then the ellene unite the rad. If something is soled and it undermine the elene then it does not chase the ellene. If something unite the elene then the elene unite the trent. If the trent is perfumed and the trent is not aldermanly then the trent dangle the elene. If something unite the elene and the elene unite the trent then it dangle the ellene. The ellene does not visit the rad.", "logic": "\nnot Dangle(ellene, rad)\nUndermine(trent, ellene)\nUndermine(trent, rad)\nAldermanly(trent)\nDangle(trent, ellene)\nnot Dangle(trent, elene)\nDangle(rad, elene)\nUnite(rad, elene)\nnot Undermine(elene, rad)\nAldermanly(elene)\nnot Cursorial(elene)\nDangle(elene, rad)\nDangle(trent, ellene) and Dangle(ellene, trent) -> not Aldermanly(ellene)\nUnite(ellene, rad) -> Unite(ellene, elene)\nforall x (Imprudent(x) and Unite(x, ellene) -> not Unite(ellene, elene))\nnot Dangle(ellene, rad) -> Unite(ellene, rad)\nforall x (Soled(x) and Undermine(x, elene) -> not Undermine(x, ellene))\nforall x (Unite(x, elene) -> Unite(elene, trent))\nPerfumed(trent) and not Aldermanly(trent) -> Dangle(trent, elene)\nforall x (Unite(x, elene) and Unite(elene, trent) -> Dangle(x, ellene))\n\nnot Unite(ellene, rad)\n\nnot Dangle(ellene, rad) and not Dangle(ellene, rad) -> Unite(ellene, rad) -> therefore Unite(ellene, rad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The jolene does not see the orrin. The billy occult the jolene. The billy occult the orrin. The billy is narrowing. The billy venesect the jolene. The billy does not see the truman. The orrin venesect the truman. The orrin jumble the truman. The truman does not chase the orrin. The truman is narrowing. The truman is not defeated. The truman venesect the orrin. If the billy venesect the jolene and the jolene venesect the billy then the jolene is not narrowing. If the jolene jumble the orrin then the jolene jumble the truman. If something is offended and it jumble the jolene then the jolene does not visit the truman. If the jolene does not see the orrin then the jolene jumble the orrin. If something is descending and it occult the truman then it does not chase the jolene. If something jumble the truman then the truman jumble the billy. If the billy is dyslexic and the billy is not narrowing then the billy venesect the truman. If something jumble the truman and the truman jumble the billy then it venesect the jolene. The orrin venesect the jolene.", "logic": "\nnot Venesect(jolene, orrin)\nOccult(billy, jolene)\nOccult(billy, orrin)\nNarrowing(billy)\nVenesect(billy, jolene)\nnot Venesect(billy, truman)\nVenesect(orrin, truman)\nJumble(orrin, truman)\nnot Occult(truman, orrin)\nNarrowing(truman)\nnot Defeated(truman)\nVenesect(truman, orrin)\nVenesect(billy, jolene) and Venesect(jolene, billy) -> not Narrowing(jolene)\nJumble(jolene, orrin) -> Jumble(jolene, truman)\nforall x (Offended(x) and Jumble(x, jolene) -> not Jumble(jolene, truman))\nnot Venesect(jolene, orrin) -> Jumble(jolene, orrin)\nforall x (Descending(x) and Occult(x, truman) -> not Occult(x, jolene))\nforall x (Jumble(x, truman) -> Jumble(truman, billy))\nDyslexic(billy) and not Narrowing(billy) -> Venesect(billy, truman)\nforall x (Jumble(x, truman) and Jumble(truman, billy) -> Venesect(x, jolene))\n\nVenesect(orrin, jolene)\n\nJumble(orrin, truman) and forall x (Jumble(x, truman) -> Jumble(truman, billy)) -> therefore Jumble(truman, billy) Jumble(orrin, truman) and Jumble(truman, billy) and forall x (Jumble(x, truman) and Jumble(truman, billy) -> Venesect(x, jolene)) -> therefore Venesect(orrin, jolene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The darice does not see the doris. The rae dispose the darice. The rae dispose the doris. The rae is bladelike. The rae coffin the darice. The rae does not see the karita. The doris coffin the karita. The doris complect the karita. The karita does not chase the doris. The karita is bladelike. The karita is not betrothed. The karita coffin the doris. If the rae coffin the darice and the darice coffin the rae then the darice is not bladelike. If the darice complect the doris then the darice complect the karita. If something is willowy and it complect the darice then the darice does not visit the karita. If the darice does not see the doris then the darice complect the doris. If something is wolfish and it dispose the karita then it does not chase the darice. If something complect the karita then the karita complect the rae. If the rae is limited and the rae is not bladelike then the rae coffin the karita. If something complect the karita and the karita complect the rae then it coffin the darice. The doris does not see the darice.", "logic": "\nnot Coffin(darice, doris)\nDispose(rae, darice)\nDispose(rae, doris)\nBladelike(rae)\nCoffin(rae, darice)\nnot Coffin(rae, karita)\nCoffin(doris, karita)\nComplect(doris, karita)\nnot Dispose(karita, doris)\nBladelike(karita)\nnot Betrothed(karita)\nCoffin(karita, doris)\nCoffin(rae, darice) and Coffin(darice, rae) -> not Bladelike(darice)\nComplect(darice, doris) -> Complect(darice, karita)\nforall x (Willowy(x) and Complect(x, darice) -> not Complect(darice, karita))\nnot Coffin(darice, doris) -> Complect(darice, doris)\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and Dispose(x, karita) -> not Dispose(x, darice))\nforall x (Complect(x, karita) -> Complect(karita, rae))\nLimited(rae) and not Bladelike(rae) -> Coffin(rae, karita)\nforall x (Complect(x, karita) and Complect(karita, rae) -> Coffin(x, darice))\n\nnot Coffin(doris, darice)\n\nComplect(doris, karita) and forall x (Complect(x, karita) -> Complect(karita, rae)) -> therefore Complect(karita, rae) Complect(doris, karita) and Complect(karita, rae) and forall x (Complect(x, karita) and Complect(karita, rae) -> Coffin(x, darice)) -> therefore Coffin(doris, darice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The germain does not see the ofella. The winston unlace the germain. The winston unlace the ofella. The winston is calycine. The winston buccaneer the germain. The winston does not see the quintana. The ofella buccaneer the quintana. The ofella french the quintana. The quintana does not chase the ofella. The quintana is calycine. The quintana is not tingling. The quintana buccaneer the ofella. If the winston buccaneer the germain and the germain buccaneer the winston then the germain is not calycine. If the germain french the ofella then the germain french the quintana. If something is smallish and it french the germain then the germain does not visit the quintana. If the germain does not see the ofella then the germain french the ofella. If something is crying and it unlace the quintana then it does not chase the germain. If something french the quintana then the quintana french the winston. If the winston is volunteer and the winston is not calycine then the winston buccaneer the quintana. If something french the quintana and the quintana french the winston then it buccaneer the germain. The germain buccaneer the germain.", "logic": "\nnot Buccaneer(germain, ofella)\nUnlace(winston, germain)\nUnlace(winston, ofella)\nCalycine(winston)\nBuccaneer(winston, germain)\nnot Buccaneer(winston, quintana)\nBuccaneer(ofella, quintana)\nFrench(ofella, quintana)\nnot Unlace(quintana, ofella)\nCalycine(quintana)\nnot Tingling(quintana)\nBuccaneer(quintana, ofella)\nBuccaneer(winston, germain) and Buccaneer(germain, winston) -> not Calycine(germain)\nFrench(germain, ofella) -> French(germain, quintana)\nforall x (Smallish(x) and French(x, germain) -> not French(germain, quintana))\nnot Buccaneer(germain, ofella) -> French(germain, ofella)\nforall x (Crying(x) and Unlace(x, quintana) -> not Unlace(x, germain))\nforall x (French(x, quintana) -> French(quintana, winston))\nVolunteer(winston) and not Calycine(winston) -> Buccaneer(winston, quintana)\nforall x (French(x, quintana) and French(quintana, winston) -> Buccaneer(x, germain))\n\nBuccaneer(germain, germain)\n\nnot Buccaneer(germain, ofella) and not Buccaneer(germain, ofella) -> French(germain, ofella) -> therefore French(germain, ofella) French(germain, ofella) and French(germain, ofella) -> French(germain, quintana) -> therefore French(germain, quintana) French(ofella, quintana) and forall x (French(x, quintana) -> French(quintana, winston)) -> therefore French(quintana, winston) French(germain, quintana) and French(quintana, winston) and forall x (French(x, quintana) and French(quintana, winston) -> Buccaneer(x, germain)) -> therefore Buccaneer(germain, germain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The theada does not see the stephana. The adel rear the theada. The adel rear the stephana. The adel is cercarial. The adel carbonize the theada. The adel does not see the umberto. The stephana carbonize the umberto. The stephana wield the umberto. The umberto does not chase the stephana. The umberto is cercarial. The umberto is not infatuated. The umberto carbonize the stephana. If the adel carbonize the theada and the theada carbonize the adel then the theada is not cercarial. If the theada wield the stephana then the theada wield the umberto. If something is hereditary and it wield the theada then the theada does not visit the umberto. If the theada does not see the stephana then the theada wield the stephana. If something is uniform and it rear the umberto then it does not chase the theada. If something wield the umberto then the umberto wield the adel. If the adel is deadpan and the adel is not cercarial then the adel carbonize the umberto. If something wield the umberto and the umberto wield the adel then it carbonize the theada. The theada does not see the theada.", "logic": "\nnot Carbonize(theada, stephana)\nRear(adel, theada)\nRear(adel, stephana)\nCercarial(adel)\nCarbonize(adel, theada)\nnot Carbonize(adel, umberto)\nCarbonize(stephana, umberto)\nWield(stephana, umberto)\nnot Rear(umberto, stephana)\nCercarial(umberto)\nnot Infatuated(umberto)\nCarbonize(umberto, stephana)\nCarbonize(adel, theada) and Carbonize(theada, adel) -> not Cercarial(theada)\nWield(theada, stephana) -> Wield(theada, umberto)\nforall x (Hereditary(x) and Wield(x, theada) -> not Wield(theada, umberto))\nnot Carbonize(theada, stephana) -> Wield(theada, stephana)\nforall x (Uniform(x) and Rear(x, umberto) -> not Rear(x, theada))\nforall x (Wield(x, umberto) -> Wield(umberto, adel))\nDeadpan(adel) and not Cercarial(adel) -> Carbonize(adel, umberto)\nforall x (Wield(x, umberto) and Wield(umberto, adel) -> Carbonize(x, theada))\n\nnot Carbonize(theada, theada)\n\nnot Carbonize(theada, stephana) and not Carbonize(theada, stephana) -> Wield(theada, stephana) -> therefore Wield(theada, stephana) Wield(theada, stephana) and Wield(theada, stephana) -> Wield(theada, umberto) -> therefore Wield(theada, umberto) Wield(stephana, umberto) and forall x (Wield(x, umberto) -> Wield(umberto, adel)) -> therefore Wield(umberto, adel) Wield(theada, umberto) and Wield(umberto, adel) and forall x (Wield(x, umberto) and Wield(umberto, adel) -> Carbonize(x, theada)) -> therefore Carbonize(theada, theada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The suzzy does not see the liuka. The alma insist the suzzy. The alma insist the liuka. The alma is legal. The alma powerwash the suzzy. The alma does not see the dori. The liuka powerwash the dori. The liuka feel the dori. The dori does not chase the liuka. The dori is legal. The dori is not amitotic. The dori powerwash the liuka. If the alma powerwash the suzzy and the suzzy powerwash the alma then the suzzy is not legal. If the suzzy feel the liuka then the suzzy feel the dori. If something is widespread and it feel the suzzy then the suzzy does not visit the dori. If the suzzy does not see the liuka then the suzzy feel the liuka. If something is javanese and it insist the dori then it does not chase the suzzy. If something feel the dori then the dori feel the alma. If the alma is dependant and the alma is not legal then the alma powerwash the dori. If something feel the dori and the dori feel the alma then it powerwash the suzzy. The dori does not see the suzzy.", "logic": "\nnot Powerwash(suzzy, liuka)\nInsist(alma, suzzy)\nInsist(alma, liuka)\nLegal(alma)\nPowerwash(alma, suzzy)\nnot Powerwash(alma, dori)\nPowerwash(liuka, dori)\nFeel(liuka, dori)\nnot Insist(dori, liuka)\nLegal(dori)\nnot Amitotic(dori)\nPowerwash(dori, liuka)\nPowerwash(alma, suzzy) and Powerwash(suzzy, alma) -> not Legal(suzzy)\nFeel(suzzy, liuka) -> Feel(suzzy, dori)\nforall x (Widespread(x) and Feel(x, suzzy) -> not Feel(suzzy, dori))\nnot Powerwash(suzzy, liuka) -> Feel(suzzy, liuka)\nforall x (Javanese(x) and Insist(x, dori) -> not Insist(x, suzzy))\nforall x (Feel(x, dori) -> Feel(dori, alma))\nDependant(alma) and not Legal(alma) -> Powerwash(alma, dori)\nforall x (Feel(x, dori) and Feel(dori, alma) -> Powerwash(x, suzzy))\n\nnot Powerwash(dori, suzzy)\n\nforall x (Feel(x, dori) and Feel(dori, alma) -> Powerwash(x, suzzy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The dorry does not see the beale. The marissa cavil the dorry. The marissa cavil the beale. The marissa is spendable. The marissa wobble the dorry. The marissa does not see the rosette. The beale wobble the rosette. The beale rejuvenate the rosette. The rosette does not chase the beale. The rosette is spendable. The rosette is not sclerosed. The rosette wobble the beale. If the marissa wobble the dorry and the dorry wobble the marissa then the dorry is not spendable. If the dorry rejuvenate the beale then the dorry rejuvenate the rosette. If something is fiery and it rejuvenate the dorry then the dorry does not visit the rosette. If the dorry does not see the beale then the dorry rejuvenate the beale. If something is brachial and it cavil the rosette then it does not chase the dorry. If something rejuvenate the rosette then the rosette rejuvenate the marissa. If the marissa is thermal and the marissa is not spendable then the marissa wobble the rosette. If something rejuvenate the rosette and the rosette rejuvenate the marissa then it wobble the dorry. The marissa rejuvenate the rosette.", "logic": "\nnot Wobble(dorry, beale)\nCavil(marissa, dorry)\nCavil(marissa, beale)\nSpendable(marissa)\nWobble(marissa, dorry)\nnot Wobble(marissa, rosette)\nWobble(beale, rosette)\nRejuvenate(beale, rosette)\nnot Cavil(rosette, beale)\nSpendable(rosette)\nnot Sclerosed(rosette)\nWobble(rosette, beale)\nWobble(marissa, dorry) and Wobble(dorry, marissa) -> not Spendable(dorry)\nRejuvenate(dorry, beale) -> Rejuvenate(dorry, rosette)\nforall x (Fiery(x) and Rejuvenate(x, dorry) -> not Rejuvenate(dorry, rosette))\nnot Wobble(dorry, beale) -> Rejuvenate(dorry, beale)\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Cavil(x, rosette) -> not Cavil(x, dorry))\nforall x (Rejuvenate(x, rosette) -> Rejuvenate(rosette, marissa))\nThermal(marissa) and not Spendable(marissa) -> Wobble(marissa, rosette)\nforall x (Rejuvenate(x, rosette) and Rejuvenate(rosette, marissa) -> Wobble(x, dorry))\n\nRejuvenate(marissa, rosette)\n\nRejuvenate(marissa, rosette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The roderich does not see the sidney. The hamlet conform the roderich. The hamlet conform the sidney. The hamlet is daughterly. The hamlet misdeal the roderich. The hamlet does not see the sibyl. The sidney misdeal the sibyl. The sidney defoliate the sibyl. The sibyl does not chase the sidney. The sibyl is daughterly. The sibyl is not vibrant. The sibyl misdeal the sidney. If the hamlet misdeal the roderich and the roderich misdeal the hamlet then the roderich is not daughterly. If the roderich defoliate the sidney then the roderich defoliate the sibyl. If something is reflexed and it defoliate the roderich then the roderich does not visit the sibyl. If the roderich does not see the sidney then the roderich defoliate the sidney. If something is such and it conform the sibyl then it does not chase the roderich. If something defoliate the sibyl then the sibyl defoliate the hamlet. If the hamlet is evaluative and the hamlet is not daughterly then the hamlet misdeal the sibyl. If something defoliate the sibyl and the sibyl defoliate the hamlet then it misdeal the roderich. The roderich is not reflexed.", "logic": "\nnot Misdeal(roderich, sidney)\nConform(hamlet, roderich)\nConform(hamlet, sidney)\nDaughterly(hamlet)\nMisdeal(hamlet, roderich)\nnot Misdeal(hamlet, sibyl)\nMisdeal(sidney, sibyl)\nDefoliate(sidney, sibyl)\nnot Conform(sibyl, sidney)\nDaughterly(sibyl)\nnot Vibrant(sibyl)\nMisdeal(sibyl, sidney)\nMisdeal(hamlet, roderich) and Misdeal(roderich, hamlet) -> not Daughterly(roderich)\nDefoliate(roderich, sidney) -> Defoliate(roderich, sibyl)\nforall x (Reflexed(x) and Defoliate(x, roderich) -> not Defoliate(roderich, sibyl))\nnot Misdeal(roderich, sidney) -> Defoliate(roderich, sidney)\nforall x (Such(x) and Conform(x, sibyl) -> not Conform(x, roderich))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, sibyl) -> Defoliate(sibyl, hamlet))\nEvaluative(hamlet) and not Daughterly(hamlet) -> Misdeal(hamlet, sibyl)\nforall x (Defoliate(x, sibyl) and Defoliate(sibyl, hamlet) -> Misdeal(x, roderich))\n\nnot Reflexed(roderich)\n\nnot Reflexed(roderich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The katheryn does not see the ulberto. The samantha garble the katheryn. The samantha garble the ulberto. The samantha is captivated. The samantha dropforge the katheryn. The samantha does not see the dixie. The ulberto dropforge the dixie. The ulberto preview the dixie. The dixie does not chase the ulberto. The dixie is captivated. The dixie is not obvious. The dixie dropforge the ulberto. If the samantha dropforge the katheryn and the katheryn dropforge the samantha then the katheryn is not captivated. If the katheryn preview the ulberto then the katheryn preview the dixie. If something is lacklustre and it preview the katheryn then the katheryn does not visit the dixie. If the katheryn does not see the ulberto then the katheryn preview the ulberto. If something is national and it garble the dixie then it does not chase the katheryn. If something preview the dixie then the dixie preview the samantha. If the samantha is exalting and the samantha is not captivated then the samantha dropforge the dixie. If something preview the dixie and the dixie preview the samantha then it dropforge the katheryn. The dixie is exalting.", "logic": "\nnot Dropforge(katheryn, ulberto)\nGarble(samantha, katheryn)\nGarble(samantha, ulberto)\nCaptivated(samantha)\nDropforge(samantha, katheryn)\nnot Dropforge(samantha, dixie)\nDropforge(ulberto, dixie)\nPreview(ulberto, dixie)\nnot Garble(dixie, ulberto)\nCaptivated(dixie)\nnot Obvious(dixie)\nDropforge(dixie, ulberto)\nDropforge(samantha, katheryn) and Dropforge(katheryn, samantha) -> not Captivated(katheryn)\nPreview(katheryn, ulberto) -> Preview(katheryn, dixie)\nforall x (Lacklustre(x) and Preview(x, katheryn) -> not Preview(katheryn, dixie))\nnot Dropforge(katheryn, ulberto) -> Preview(katheryn, ulberto)\nforall x (National(x) and Garble(x, dixie) -> not Garble(x, katheryn))\nforall x (Preview(x, dixie) -> Preview(dixie, samantha))\nExalting(samantha) and not Captivated(samantha) -> Dropforge(samantha, dixie)\nforall x (Preview(x, dixie) and Preview(dixie, samantha) -> Dropforge(x, katheryn))\n\nExalting(dixie)\n\nExalting(dixie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The town does not see the gratiana. The stefa bedhop the town. The stefa bedhop the gratiana. The stefa is snuggled. The stefa seclude the town. The stefa does not see the alberto. The gratiana seclude the alberto. The gratiana coapt the alberto. The alberto does not chase the gratiana. The alberto is snuggled. The alberto is not ribbed. The alberto seclude the gratiana. If the stefa seclude the town and the town seclude the stefa then the town is not snuggled. If the town coapt the gratiana then the town coapt the alberto. If something is singing and it coapt the town then the town does not visit the alberto. If the town does not see the gratiana then the town coapt the gratiana. If something is sworn and it bedhop the alberto then it does not chase the town. If something coapt the alberto then the alberto coapt the stefa. If the stefa is liberal and the stefa is not snuggled then the stefa seclude the alberto. If something coapt the alberto and the alberto coapt the stefa then it seclude the town. The alberto is not sworn.", "logic": "\nnot Seclude(town, gratiana)\nBedhop(stefa, town)\nBedhop(stefa, gratiana)\nSnuggled(stefa)\nSeclude(stefa, town)\nnot Seclude(stefa, alberto)\nSeclude(gratiana, alberto)\nCoapt(gratiana, alberto)\nnot Bedhop(alberto, gratiana)\nSnuggled(alberto)\nnot Ribbed(alberto)\nSeclude(alberto, gratiana)\nSeclude(stefa, town) and Seclude(town, stefa) -> not Snuggled(town)\nCoapt(town, gratiana) -> Coapt(town, alberto)\nforall x (Singing(x) and Coapt(x, town) -> not Coapt(town, alberto))\nnot Seclude(town, gratiana) -> Coapt(town, gratiana)\nforall x (Sworn(x) and Bedhop(x, alberto) -> not Bedhop(x, town))\nforall x (Coapt(x, alberto) -> Coapt(alberto, stefa))\nLiberal(stefa) and not Snuggled(stefa) -> Seclude(stefa, alberto)\nforall x (Coapt(x, alberto) and Coapt(alberto, stefa) -> Seclude(x, town))\n\nnot Sworn(alberto)\n\nnot Sworn(alberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The berte does not see the maye. The ossie donate the berte. The ossie donate the maye. The ossie is nonskid. The ossie aliment the berte. The ossie does not see the josh. The maye aliment the josh. The maye unmuzzle the josh. The josh does not chase the maye. The josh is nonskid. The josh is not antitumour. The josh aliment the maye. If the ossie aliment the berte and the berte aliment the ossie then the berte is not nonskid. If the berte unmuzzle the maye then the berte unmuzzle the josh. If something is monoclinal and it unmuzzle the berte then the berte does not visit the josh. If the berte does not see the maye then the berte unmuzzle the maye. If something is maxi and it donate the josh then it does not chase the berte. If something unmuzzle the josh then the josh unmuzzle the ossie. If the ossie is youngish and the ossie is not nonskid then the ossie aliment the josh. If something unmuzzle the josh and the josh unmuzzle the ossie then it aliment the berte. The maye aliment the ossie.", "logic": "\nnot Aliment(berte, maye)\nDonate(ossie, berte)\nDonate(ossie, maye)\nNonskid(ossie)\nAliment(ossie, berte)\nnot Aliment(ossie, josh)\nAliment(maye, josh)\nUnmuzzle(maye, josh)\nnot Donate(josh, maye)\nNonskid(josh)\nnot Antitumour(josh)\nAliment(josh, maye)\nAliment(ossie, berte) and Aliment(berte, ossie) -> not Nonskid(berte)\nUnmuzzle(berte, maye) -> Unmuzzle(berte, josh)\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) and Unmuzzle(x, berte) -> not Unmuzzle(berte, josh))\nnot Aliment(berte, maye) -> Unmuzzle(berte, maye)\nforall x (Maxi(x) and Donate(x, josh) -> not Donate(x, berte))\nforall x (Unmuzzle(x, josh) -> Unmuzzle(josh, ossie))\nYoungish(ossie) and not Nonskid(ossie) -> Aliment(ossie, josh)\nforall x (Unmuzzle(x, josh) and Unmuzzle(josh, ossie) -> Aliment(x, berte))\n\nAliment(maye, ossie)\n\nAliment(maye, ossie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The merlin does not see the ainslie. The lian buttweld the merlin. The lian buttweld the ainslie. The lian is derogatory. The lian subtilize the merlin. The lian does not see the bailie. The ainslie subtilize the bailie. The ainslie replant the bailie. The bailie does not chase the ainslie. The bailie is derogatory. The bailie is not esurient. The bailie subtilize the ainslie. If the lian subtilize the merlin and the merlin subtilize the lian then the merlin is not derogatory. If the merlin replant the ainslie then the merlin replant the bailie. If something is curt and it replant the merlin then the merlin does not visit the bailie. If the merlin does not see the ainslie then the merlin replant the ainslie. If something is multiplied and it buttweld the bailie then it does not chase the merlin. If something replant the bailie then the bailie replant the lian. If the lian is broadloom and the lian is not derogatory then the lian subtilize the bailie. If something replant the bailie and the bailie replant the lian then it subtilize the merlin. The merlin is not broadloom.", "logic": "\nnot Subtilize(merlin, ainslie)\nButtweld(lian, merlin)\nButtweld(lian, ainslie)\nDerogatory(lian)\nSubtilize(lian, merlin)\nnot Subtilize(lian, bailie)\nSubtilize(ainslie, bailie)\nReplant(ainslie, bailie)\nnot Buttweld(bailie, ainslie)\nDerogatory(bailie)\nnot Esurient(bailie)\nSubtilize(bailie, ainslie)\nSubtilize(lian, merlin) and Subtilize(merlin, lian) -> not Derogatory(merlin)\nReplant(merlin, ainslie) -> Replant(merlin, bailie)\nforall x (Curt(x) and Replant(x, merlin) -> not Replant(merlin, bailie))\nnot Subtilize(merlin, ainslie) -> Replant(merlin, ainslie)\nforall x (Multiplied(x) and Buttweld(x, bailie) -> not Buttweld(x, merlin))\nforall x (Replant(x, bailie) -> Replant(bailie, lian))\nBroadloom(lian) and not Derogatory(lian) -> Subtilize(lian, bailie)\nforall x (Replant(x, bailie) and Replant(bailie, lian) -> Subtilize(x, merlin))\n\nnot Broadloom(merlin)\n\nnot Broadloom(merlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The dayna does not see the ivette. The rasla rein the dayna. The rasla rein the ivette. The rasla is owlish. The rasla germinate the dayna. The rasla does not see the scarlett. The ivette germinate the scarlett. The ivette overbid the scarlett. The scarlett does not chase the ivette. The scarlett is owlish. The scarlett is not ethereal. The scarlett germinate the ivette. If the rasla germinate the dayna and the dayna germinate the rasla then the dayna is not owlish. If the dayna overbid the ivette then the dayna overbid the scarlett. If something is duplicable and it overbid the dayna then the dayna does not visit the scarlett. If the dayna does not see the ivette then the dayna overbid the ivette. If something is covariant and it rein the scarlett then it does not chase the dayna. If something overbid the scarlett then the scarlett overbid the rasla. If the rasla is smallish and the rasla is not owlish then the rasla germinate the scarlett. If something overbid the scarlett and the scarlett overbid the rasla then it germinate the dayna. The dayna overbid the rasla.", "logic": "\nnot Germinate(dayna, ivette)\nRein(rasla, dayna)\nRein(rasla, ivette)\nOwlish(rasla)\nGerminate(rasla, dayna)\nnot Germinate(rasla, scarlett)\nGerminate(ivette, scarlett)\nOverbid(ivette, scarlett)\nnot Rein(scarlett, ivette)\nOwlish(scarlett)\nnot Ethereal(scarlett)\nGerminate(scarlett, ivette)\nGerminate(rasla, dayna) and Germinate(dayna, rasla) -> not Owlish(dayna)\nOverbid(dayna, ivette) -> Overbid(dayna, scarlett)\nforall x (Duplicable(x) and Overbid(x, dayna) -> not Overbid(dayna, scarlett))\nnot Germinate(dayna, ivette) -> Overbid(dayna, ivette)\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Rein(x, scarlett) -> not Rein(x, dayna))\nforall x (Overbid(x, scarlett) -> Overbid(scarlett, rasla))\nSmallish(rasla) and not Owlish(rasla) -> Germinate(rasla, scarlett)\nforall x (Overbid(x, scarlett) and Overbid(scarlett, rasla) -> Germinate(x, dayna))\n\nOverbid(dayna, rasla)\n\nOverbid(dayna, rasla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "Jerold is fatal. Jerold is peruvian. Jerold is ordered. Jerold is husbandly. Jerold is chanceful. Melisenda is peruvian. Deryl is ivied. If someone is dodgy and peruvian then they are ivied. All peruvian, ivied people are ordered. Furry people are dodgy. Jerold is chanceful.", "logic": "\nFatal(jerold)\nPeruvian(jerold)\nOrdered(jerold)\nHusbandly(jerold)\nChanceful(jerold)\nPeruvian(melisenda)\nIvied(deryl)\nforall x (Dodgy(x) and Peruvian(x) -> Ivied(x))\nforall x (Peruvian(x) and Ivied(x) -> Ordered(x))\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> Dodgy(x))\n\nChanceful(jerold)\n\ntherefore Chanceful(jerold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Bennett is meritable. Bennett is eparchial. Bennett is peninsular. Bennett is unpierced. Bennett is deviant. Brunella is eparchial. Mariya is nethermost. If someone is untaped and eparchial then they are nethermost. All eparchial, nethermost people are peninsular. Furry people are untaped. Bennett is not deviant.", "logic": "\nMeritable(bennett)\nEparchial(bennett)\nPeninsular(bennett)\nUnpierced(bennett)\nDeviant(bennett)\nEparchial(brunella)\nNethermost(mariya)\nforall x (Untaped(x) and Eparchial(x) -> Nethermost(x))\nforall x (Eparchial(x) and Nethermost(x) -> Peninsular(x))\nforall x (Eparchial(x) -> Untaped(x))\n\nnot Deviant(bennett)\n\ntherefore Deviant(bennett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Rhea is interwoven. Rhea is frosted. Rhea is comestible. Rhea is singular. Rhea is iridaceous. Jeannie is frosted. Julia is sporadic. If someone is hasidic and frosted then they are sporadic. All frosted, sporadic people are comestible. Furry people are hasidic. Jeannie is hasidic.", "logic": "\nInterwoven(rhea)\nFrosted(rhea)\nComestible(rhea)\nSingular(rhea)\nIridaceous(rhea)\nFrosted(jeannie)\nSporadic(julia)\nforall x (Hasidic(x) and Frosted(x) -> Sporadic(x))\nforall x (Frosted(x) and Sporadic(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Frosted(x) -> Hasidic(x))\n\nHasidic(jeannie)\n\nFrosted(jeannie) and forall x (Frosted(x) -> Hasidic(x)) -> therefore Hasidic(jeannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Shina is menopausal. Shina is telescoped. Shina is augustan. Shina is tenured. Shina is colonic. Marlyn is telescoped. Beatrice is hyperfine. If someone is colorful and telescoped then they are hyperfine. All telescoped, hyperfine people are augustan. Furry people are colorful. Marlyn is not colorful.", "logic": "\nMenopausal(shina)\nTelescoped(shina)\nAugustan(shina)\nTenured(shina)\nColonic(shina)\nTelescoped(marlyn)\nHyperfine(beatrice)\nforall x (Colorful(x) and Telescoped(x) -> Hyperfine(x))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) and Hyperfine(x) -> Augustan(x))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Colorful(x))\n\nnot Colorful(marlyn)\n\nTelescoped(marlyn) and forall x (Telescoped(x) -> Colorful(x)) -> therefore Colorful(marlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Socrates is ragged. Socrates is rife. Socrates is blurry. Socrates is stemless. Socrates is manned. Georgie is rife. Orel is goosey. If someone is endovenous and rife then they are goosey. All rife, goosey people are blurry. Furry people are endovenous. Socrates is goosey.", "logic": "\nRagged(socrates)\nRife(socrates)\nBlurry(socrates)\nStemless(socrates)\nManned(socrates)\nRife(georgie)\nGoosey(orel)\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Rife(x) -> Goosey(x))\nforall x (Rife(x) and Goosey(x) -> Blurry(x))\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Endovenous(x))\n\nGoosey(socrates)\n\nRife(socrates) and forall x (Rife(x) -> Endovenous(x)) -> therefore Endovenous(socrates) Endovenous(socrates) and Rife(socrates) and forall x (Endovenous(x) and Rife(x) -> Goosey(x)) -> therefore Goosey(socrates)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Dafna is bulbar. Dafna is illiterate. Dafna is treated. Dafna is jangling. Dafna is burled. Dani is illiterate. Roger is insensate. If someone is rocky and illiterate then they are insensate. All illiterate, insensate people are treated. Furry people are rocky. Dani is not insensate.", "logic": "\nBulbar(dafna)\nIlliterate(dafna)\nTreated(dafna)\nJangling(dafna)\nBurled(dafna)\nIlliterate(dani)\nInsensate(roger)\nforall x (Rocky(x) and Illiterate(x) -> Insensate(x))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) and Insensate(x) -> Treated(x))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) -> Rocky(x))\n\nnot Insensate(dani)\n\nIlliterate(dani) and forall x (Illiterate(x) -> Rocky(x)) -> therefore Rocky(dani) Rocky(dani) and Illiterate(dani) and forall x (Rocky(x) and Illiterate(x) -> Insensate(x)) -> therefore Insensate(dani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Shandy is bicolored. Shandy is wispy. Shandy is brinded. Shandy is lapidarian. Shandy is threadbare. Cathi is wispy. Ula is albuminous. If someone is azimuthal and wispy then they are albuminous. All wispy, albuminous people are brinded. Furry people are azimuthal. Cathi is brinded.", "logic": "\nBicolored(shandy)\nWispy(shandy)\nBrinded(shandy)\nLapidarian(shandy)\nThreadbare(shandy)\nWispy(cathi)\nAlbuminous(ula)\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and Wispy(x) -> Albuminous(x))\nforall x (Wispy(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Wispy(x) -> Azimuthal(x))\n\nBrinded(cathi)\n\nWispy(cathi) and forall x (Wispy(x) -> Azimuthal(x)) -> therefore Azimuthal(cathi) Azimuthal(cathi) and Wispy(cathi) and forall x (Azimuthal(x) and Wispy(x) -> Albuminous(x)) -> therefore Albuminous(cathi) Wispy(cathi) and Albuminous(cathi) and forall x (Wispy(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Brinded(x)) -> therefore Brinded(cathi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Kathe is decided. Kathe is eugenic. Kathe is molecular. Kathe is ellipsoid. Kathe is scorched. Minny is eugenic. Cathie is alfresco. If someone is terminable and eugenic then they are alfresco. All eugenic, alfresco people are molecular. Furry people are terminable. Minny is not molecular.", "logic": "\nDecided(kathe)\nEugenic(kathe)\nMolecular(kathe)\nEllipsoid(kathe)\nScorched(kathe)\nEugenic(minny)\nAlfresco(cathie)\nforall x (Terminable(x) and Eugenic(x) -> Alfresco(x))\nforall x (Eugenic(x) and Alfresco(x) -> Molecular(x))\nforall x (Eugenic(x) -> Terminable(x))\n\nnot Molecular(minny)\n\nEugenic(minny) and forall x (Eugenic(x) -> Terminable(x)) -> therefore Terminable(minny) Terminable(minny) and Eugenic(minny) and forall x (Terminable(x) and Eugenic(x) -> Alfresco(x)) -> therefore Alfresco(minny) Eugenic(minny) and Alfresco(minny) and forall x (Eugenic(x) and Alfresco(x) -> Molecular(x)) -> therefore Molecular(minny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Dorrie is overhasty. Dorrie is repellant. Dorrie is gruff. Dorrie is furtive. Dorrie is exanimate. Shanta is repellant. Olva is ladened. If someone is imposed and repellant then they are ladened. All repellant, ladened people are gruff. Furry people are imposed. Olva is not imposed.", "logic": "\nOverhasty(dorrie)\nRepellant(dorrie)\nGruff(dorrie)\nFurtive(dorrie)\nExanimate(dorrie)\nRepellant(shanta)\nLadened(olva)\nforall x (Imposed(x) and Repellant(x) -> Ladened(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and Ladened(x) -> Gruff(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Imposed(x))\n\nnot Imposed(olva)\n\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Imposed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Albertine is tripping. Albertine is exigent. Albertine is senecan. Albertine is derogatory. Albertine is bent. Felice is exigent. Mariel is deistic. If someone is elongated and exigent then they are deistic. All exigent, deistic people are senecan. Furry people are elongated. Mariel is senecan.", "logic": "\nTripping(albertine)\nExigent(albertine)\nSenecan(albertine)\nDerogatory(albertine)\nBent(albertine)\nExigent(felice)\nDeistic(mariel)\nforall x (Elongated(x) and Exigent(x) -> Deistic(x))\nforall x (Exigent(x) and Deistic(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Exigent(x) -> Elongated(x))\n\nSenecan(mariel)\n\nforall x (Exigent(x) and Deistic(x) -> Senecan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Fey is monophonic. Fey is braky. Fey is adoptable. Fey is curvy. Fey is fourteenth. Moll is braky. Shelbi is digestible. If someone is healed and braky then they are digestible. All braky, digestible people are adoptable. Furry people are healed. Moll is not curvy.", "logic": "\nMonophonic(fey)\nBraky(fey)\nAdoptable(fey)\nCurvy(fey)\nFourteenth(fey)\nBraky(moll)\nDigestible(shelbi)\nforall x (Healed(x) and Braky(x) -> Digestible(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and Digestible(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Healed(x))\n\nnot Curvy(moll)\n\nnot Curvy(moll) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Otes is yankee. Otes is annelidan. Otes is cheapjack. Otes is childlike. Otes is glottal. Shira is annelidan. Fiann is psychical. If someone is alleviated and annelidan then they are psychical. All annelidan, psychical people are cheapjack. Furry people are alleviated. Shira is glottal.", "logic": "\nYankee(otes)\nAnnelidan(otes)\nCheapjack(otes)\nChildlike(otes)\nGlottal(otes)\nAnnelidan(shira)\nPsychical(fiann)\nforall x (Alleviated(x) and Annelidan(x) -> Psychical(x))\nforall x (Annelidan(x) and Psychical(x) -> Cheapjack(x))\nforall x (Annelidan(x) -> Alleviated(x))\n\nGlottal(shira)\n\nGlottal(shira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Lynnet is criterial. Lynnet is postural. Lynnet is oppositive. Lynnet is aggregated. Lynnet is bewildered. Violet is postural. Hewie is anticancer. If someone is cubiform and postural then they are anticancer. All postural, anticancer people are oppositive. Furry people are cubiform. Hewie is not aggregated.", "logic": "\nCriterial(lynnet)\nPostural(lynnet)\nOppositive(lynnet)\nAggregated(lynnet)\nBewildered(lynnet)\nPostural(violet)\nAnticancer(hewie)\nforall x (Cubiform(x) and Postural(x) -> Anticancer(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) and Anticancer(x) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) -> Cubiform(x))\n\nnot Aggregated(hewie)\n\nnot Aggregated(hewie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Deidre is great. Deidre is synoptic. Deidre is slothful. Deidre is unfeasible. Deidre is oecumenic. Kassie is synoptic. Lenka is dislocated. If someone is exploited and synoptic then they are dislocated. All synoptic, dislocated people are slothful. Furry people are exploited. Lenka is oecumenic.", "logic": "\nGreat(deidre)\nSynoptic(deidre)\nSlothful(deidre)\nUnfeasible(deidre)\nOecumenic(deidre)\nSynoptic(kassie)\nDislocated(lenka)\nforall x (Exploited(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Dislocated(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and Dislocated(x) -> Slothful(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) -> Exploited(x))\n\nOecumenic(lenka)\n\nOecumenic(lenka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Daren is exulting. Daren is booted. Daren is manual. Daren is achromatic. Daren is shrinkable. Juline is booted. Blithe is painterly. If someone is luculent and booted then they are painterly. All booted, painterly people are manual. Furry people are luculent. Blithe is not booted.", "logic": "\nExulting(daren)\nBooted(daren)\nManual(daren)\nAchromatic(daren)\nShrinkable(daren)\nBooted(juline)\nPainterly(blithe)\nforall x (Luculent(x) and Booted(x) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) and Painterly(x) -> Manual(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) -> Luculent(x))\n\nnot Booted(blithe)\n\nnot Booted(blithe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Natalie is otherwise. Natalie is dependant. Natalie is crosswise. Natalie is decorative. Natalie is savory. Evie is dependant. Lucian is tactical. If someone is underclass and dependant then they are tactical. All dependant, tactical people are crosswise. Furry people are underclass. Evie is otherwise.", "logic": "\nOtherwise(natalie)\nDependant(natalie)\nCrosswise(natalie)\nDecorative(natalie)\nSavory(natalie)\nDependant(evie)\nTactical(lucian)\nforall x (Underclass(x) and Dependant(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) and Tactical(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) -> Underclass(x))\n\nOtherwise(evie)\n\nOtherwise(evie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The darcee maim the flemming. The flemming goose the darcee. The flemming colorise the darcee. If something colorise the darcee then it goose the darcee. If something maim the flemming then the flemming is ordinary. If something maim the darcee and the darcee is keyless then the darcee maim the flemming. If something is ordinary then it maim the flemming. If something is hugoesque and pyemic then it goose the darcee. If something maim the flemming then it maim the darcee. The flemming colorise the darcee.", "logic": "\nMaim(darcee, flemming)\nGoose(flemming, darcee)\nColorise(flemming, darcee)\nforall x (Colorise(x, darcee) -> Goose(x, darcee))\nforall x (Maim(x, flemming) -> Ordinary(flemming))\nforall x (Maim(x, darcee) and Keyless(darcee) -> Maim(darcee, flemming))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> Maim(x, flemming))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) and Pyemic(x) -> Goose(x, darcee))\nforall x (Maim(x, flemming) -> Maim(x, darcee))\n\nColorise(flemming, darcee)\n\ntherefore Colorise(flemming, darcee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The kakalina defile the aimil. The aimil cadge the kakalina. The aimil trust the kakalina. If something trust the kakalina then it cadge the kakalina. If something defile the aimil then the aimil is palatine. If something defile the kakalina and the kakalina is worldwide then the kakalina defile the aimil. If something is palatine then it defile the aimil. If something is idealised and permeable then it cadge the kakalina. If something defile the aimil then it defile the kakalina. The aimil does not like the kakalina.", "logic": "\nDefile(kakalina, aimil)\nCadge(aimil, kakalina)\nTrust(aimil, kakalina)\nforall x (Trust(x, kakalina) -> Cadge(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Defile(x, aimil) -> Palatine(aimil))\nforall x (Defile(x, kakalina) and Worldwide(kakalina) -> Defile(kakalina, aimil))\nforall x (Palatine(x) -> Defile(x, aimil))\nforall x (Idealised(x) and Permeable(x) -> Cadge(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Defile(x, aimil) -> Defile(x, kakalina))\n\nnot Trust(aimil, kakalina)\n\ntherefore Trust(aimil, kakalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The vivienne tense the joycelin. The joycelin leer the vivienne. The joycelin mulch the vivienne. If something mulch the vivienne then it leer the vivienne. If something tense the joycelin then the joycelin is demolished. If something tense the vivienne and the vivienne is sectioned then the vivienne tense the joycelin. If something is demolished then it tense the joycelin. If something is ferned and moralistic then it leer the vivienne. If something tense the joycelin then it tense the vivienne. The joycelin is demolished.", "logic": "\nTense(vivienne, joycelin)\nLeer(joycelin, vivienne)\nMulch(joycelin, vivienne)\nforall x (Mulch(x, vivienne) -> Leer(x, vivienne))\nforall x (Tense(x, joycelin) -> Demolished(joycelin))\nforall x (Tense(x, vivienne) and Sectioned(vivienne) -> Tense(vivienne, joycelin))\nforall x (Demolished(x) -> Tense(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Ferned(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Leer(x, vivienne))\nforall x (Tense(x, joycelin) -> Tense(x, vivienne))\n\nDemolished(joycelin)\n\nTense(vivienne, joycelin) and forall x (Tense(x, joycelin) -> Demolished(joycelin)) -> therefore Demolished(joycelin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The natalie crosshatch the dorey. The dorey transpire the natalie. The dorey eschew the natalie. If something eschew the natalie then it transpire the natalie. If something crosshatch the dorey then the dorey is electoral. If something crosshatch the natalie and the natalie is visible then the natalie crosshatch the dorey. If something is electoral then it crosshatch the dorey. If something is seedless and commensal then it transpire the natalie. If something crosshatch the dorey then it crosshatch the natalie. The dorey is not electoral.", "logic": "\nCrosshatch(natalie, dorey)\nTranspire(dorey, natalie)\nEschew(dorey, natalie)\nforall x (Eschew(x, natalie) -> Transpire(x, natalie))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, dorey) -> Electoral(dorey))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, natalie) and Visible(natalie) -> Crosshatch(natalie, dorey))\nforall x (Electoral(x) -> Crosshatch(x, dorey))\nforall x (Seedless(x) and Commensal(x) -> Transpire(x, natalie))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, dorey) -> Crosshatch(x, natalie))\n\nnot Electoral(dorey)\n\nCrosshatch(natalie, dorey) and forall x (Crosshatch(x, dorey) -> Electoral(dorey)) -> therefore Electoral(dorey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The slade aliment the vanessa. The vanessa veil the slade. The vanessa featherbed the slade. If something featherbed the slade then it veil the slade. If something aliment the vanessa then the vanessa is obligatory. If something aliment the slade and the slade is amused then the slade aliment the vanessa. If something is obligatory then it aliment the vanessa. If something is metabolous and nibbed then it veil the slade. If something aliment the vanessa then it aliment the slade. The vanessa aliment the vanessa.", "logic": "\nAliment(slade, vanessa)\nVeil(vanessa, slade)\nFeatherbed(vanessa, slade)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, slade) -> Veil(x, slade))\nforall x (Aliment(x, vanessa) -> Obligatory(vanessa))\nforall x (Aliment(x, slade) and Amused(slade) -> Aliment(slade, vanessa))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) -> Aliment(x, vanessa))\nforall x (Metabolous(x) and Nibbed(x) -> Veil(x, slade))\nforall x (Aliment(x, vanessa) -> Aliment(x, slade))\n\nAliment(vanessa, vanessa)\n\nAliment(slade, vanessa) and forall x (Aliment(x, vanessa) -> Obligatory(vanessa)) -> therefore Obligatory(vanessa) Obligatory(vanessa) and forall x (Obligatory(x) -> Aliment(x, vanessa)) -> therefore Aliment(vanessa, vanessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The gayle rededicate the ashly. The ashly disincline the gayle. The ashly smile the gayle. If something smile the gayle then it disincline the gayle. If something rededicate the ashly then the ashly is shrieked. If something rededicate the gayle and the gayle is desegrated then the gayle rededicate the ashly. If something is shrieked then it rededicate the ashly. If something is malicious and pouched then it disincline the gayle. If something rededicate the ashly then it rededicate the gayle. The ashly does not see the ashly.", "logic": "\nRededicate(gayle, ashly)\nDisincline(ashly, gayle)\nSmile(ashly, gayle)\nforall x (Smile(x, gayle) -> Disincline(x, gayle))\nforall x (Rededicate(x, ashly) -> Shrieked(ashly))\nforall x (Rededicate(x, gayle) and Desegrated(gayle) -> Rededicate(gayle, ashly))\nforall x (Shrieked(x) -> Rededicate(x, ashly))\nforall x (Malicious(x) and Pouched(x) -> Disincline(x, gayle))\nforall x (Rededicate(x, ashly) -> Rededicate(x, gayle))\n\nnot Rededicate(ashly, ashly)\n\nRededicate(gayle, ashly) and forall x (Rededicate(x, ashly) -> Shrieked(ashly)) -> therefore Shrieked(ashly) Shrieked(ashly) and forall x (Shrieked(x) -> Rededicate(x, ashly)) -> therefore Rededicate(ashly, ashly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The emil decollate the adair. The adair inaugurate the emil. The adair position the emil. If something position the emil then it inaugurate the emil. If something decollate the adair then the adair is banner. If something decollate the emil and the emil is artless then the emil decollate the adair. If something is banner then it decollate the adair. If something is matted and blank then it inaugurate the emil. If something decollate the adair then it decollate the emil. The adair decollate the emil.", "logic": "\nDecollate(emil, adair)\nInaugurate(adair, emil)\nPosition(adair, emil)\nforall x (Position(x, emil) -> Inaugurate(x, emil))\nforall x (Decollate(x, adair) -> Banner(adair))\nforall x (Decollate(x, emil) and Artless(emil) -> Decollate(emil, adair))\nforall x (Banner(x) -> Decollate(x, adair))\nforall x (Matted(x) and Blank(x) -> Inaugurate(x, emil))\nforall x (Decollate(x, adair) -> Decollate(x, emil))\n\nDecollate(adair, emil)\n\nDecollate(emil, adair) and forall x (Decollate(x, adair) -> Banner(adair)) -> therefore Banner(adair) Banner(adair) and forall x (Banner(x) -> Decollate(x, adair)) -> therefore Decollate(adair, adair) Decollate(adair, adair) and forall x (Decollate(x, adair) -> Decollate(x, emil)) -> therefore Decollate(adair, emil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The davidson bend the nell. The nell farrow the davidson. The nell commix the davidson. If something commix the davidson then it farrow the davidson. If something bend the nell then the nell is faithless. If something bend the davidson and the davidson is pharyngeal then the davidson bend the nell. If something is faithless then it bend the nell. If something is foreboding and repressive then it farrow the davidson. If something bend the nell then it bend the davidson. The nell does not see the davidson.", "logic": "\nBend(davidson, nell)\nFarrow(nell, davidson)\nCommix(nell, davidson)\nforall x (Commix(x, davidson) -> Farrow(x, davidson))\nforall x (Bend(x, nell) -> Faithless(nell))\nforall x (Bend(x, davidson) and Pharyngeal(davidson) -> Bend(davidson, nell))\nforall x (Faithless(x) -> Bend(x, nell))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) and Repressive(x) -> Farrow(x, davidson))\nforall x (Bend(x, nell) -> Bend(x, davidson))\n\nnot Bend(nell, davidson)\n\nBend(davidson, nell) and forall x (Bend(x, nell) -> Faithless(nell)) -> therefore Faithless(nell) Faithless(nell) and forall x (Faithless(x) -> Bend(x, nell)) -> therefore Bend(nell, nell) Bend(nell, nell) and forall x (Bend(x, nell) -> Bend(x, davidson)) -> therefore Bend(nell, davidson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The abbott lavish the julee. The julee slow the abbott. The julee hive the abbott. If something hive the abbott then it slow the abbott. If something lavish the julee then the julee is winglike. If something lavish the abbott and the abbott is overhanded then the abbott lavish the julee. If something is winglike then it lavish the julee. If something is unthought and effaceable then it slow the abbott. If something lavish the julee then it lavish the abbott. The abbott does not chase the abbott.", "logic": "\nLavish(abbott, julee)\nSlow(julee, abbott)\nHive(julee, abbott)\nforall x (Hive(x, abbott) -> Slow(x, abbott))\nforall x (Lavish(x, julee) -> Winglike(julee))\nforall x (Lavish(x, abbott) and Overhanded(abbott) -> Lavish(abbott, julee))\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> Lavish(x, julee))\nforall x (Unthought(x) and Effaceable(x) -> Slow(x, abbott))\nforall x (Lavish(x, julee) -> Lavish(x, abbott))\n\nnot Slow(abbott, abbott)\n\nforall x (Hive(x, abbott) -> Slow(x, abbott)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The kevin unchurch the steven. The steven outsell the kevin. The steven bear the kevin. If something bear the kevin then it outsell the kevin. If something unchurch the steven then the steven is redundant. If something unchurch the kevin and the kevin is glittering then the kevin unchurch the steven. If something is redundant then it unchurch the steven. If something is barbellate and ionized then it outsell the kevin. If something unchurch the steven then it unchurch the kevin. The kevin bear the steven.", "logic": "\nUnchurch(kevin, steven)\nOutsell(steven, kevin)\nBear(steven, kevin)\nforall x (Bear(x, kevin) -> Outsell(x, kevin))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, steven) -> Redundant(steven))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, kevin) and Glittering(kevin) -> Unchurch(kevin, steven))\nforall x (Redundant(x) -> Unchurch(x, steven))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) and Ionized(x) -> Outsell(x, kevin))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, steven) -> Unchurch(x, kevin))\n\nBear(kevin, steven)\n\nBear(kevin, steven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The janice neigh the stinky. The stinky disguise the janice. The stinky wharf the janice. If something wharf the janice then it disguise the janice. If something neigh the stinky then the stinky is unlimited. If something neigh the janice and the janice is globular then the janice neigh the stinky. If something is unlimited then it neigh the stinky. If something is unwebbed and meridional then it disguise the janice. If something neigh the stinky then it neigh the janice. The stinky is not meridional.", "logic": "\nNeigh(janice, stinky)\nDisguise(stinky, janice)\nWharf(stinky, janice)\nforall x (Wharf(x, janice) -> Disguise(x, janice))\nforall x (Neigh(x, stinky) -> Unlimited(stinky))\nforall x (Neigh(x, janice) and Globular(janice) -> Neigh(janice, stinky))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) -> Neigh(x, stinky))\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) and Meridional(x) -> Disguise(x, janice))\nforall x (Neigh(x, stinky) -> Neigh(x, janice))\n\nnot Meridional(stinky)\n\nnot Meridional(stinky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The marga undock the adela. The adela barbeque the marga. The adela bushel the marga. If something bushel the marga then it barbeque the marga. If something undock the adela then the adela is flowered. If something undock the marga and the marga is unoccupied then the marga undock the adela. If something is flowered then it undock the adela. If something is gritty and slovakian then it barbeque the marga. If something undock the adela then it undock the marga. The marga is unoccupied.", "logic": "\nUndock(marga, adela)\nBarbeque(adela, marga)\nBushel(adela, marga)\nforall x (Bushel(x, marga) -> Barbeque(x, marga))\nforall x (Undock(x, adela) -> Flowered(adela))\nforall x (Undock(x, marga) and Unoccupied(marga) -> Undock(marga, adela))\nforall x (Flowered(x) -> Undock(x, adela))\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Slovakian(x) -> Barbeque(x, marga))\nforall x (Undock(x, adela) -> Undock(x, marga))\n\nUnoccupied(marga)\n\nUnoccupied(marga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The eustace pardon the ninon. The ninon evangelize the eustace. The ninon uncross the eustace. If something uncross the eustace then it evangelize the eustace. If something pardon the ninon then the ninon is pectoral. If something pardon the eustace and the eustace is aeriferous then the eustace pardon the ninon. If something is pectoral then it pardon the ninon. If something is charmed and straying then it evangelize the eustace. If something pardon the ninon then it pardon the eustace. The eustace does not like the eustace.", "logic": "\nPardon(eustace, ninon)\nEvangelize(ninon, eustace)\nUncross(ninon, eustace)\nforall x (Uncross(x, eustace) -> Evangelize(x, eustace))\nforall x (Pardon(x, ninon) -> Pectoral(ninon))\nforall x (Pardon(x, eustace) and Aeriferous(eustace) -> Pardon(eustace, ninon))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Pardon(x, ninon))\nforall x (Charmed(x) and Straying(x) -> Evangelize(x, eustace))\nforall x (Pardon(x, ninon) -> Pardon(x, eustace))\n\nnot Uncross(eustace, eustace)\n\nnot Uncross(eustace, eustace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The lynnette combine the lionel. The lionel mute the lynnette. The lionel emphasize the lynnette. If something emphasize the lynnette then it mute the lynnette. If something combine the lionel then the lionel is shrewish. If something combine the lynnette and the lynnette is curvey then the lynnette combine the lionel. If something is shrewish then it combine the lionel. If something is quadrate and chemical then it mute the lynnette. If something combine the lionel then it combine the lynnette. The lynnette is round.", "logic": "\nCombine(lynnette, lionel)\nMute(lionel, lynnette)\nEmphasize(lionel, lynnette)\nforall x (Emphasize(x, lynnette) -> Mute(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Combine(x, lionel) -> Shrewish(lionel))\nforall x (Combine(x, lynnette) and Curvey(lynnette) -> Combine(lynnette, lionel))\nforall x (Shrewish(x) -> Combine(x, lionel))\nforall x (Quadrate(x) and Chemical(x) -> Mute(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Combine(x, lionel) -> Combine(x, lynnette))\n\nRound(lynnette)\n\nRound(lynnette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The vaughn revenge the melonie. The melonie submit the vaughn. The melonie rivet the vaughn. If something rivet the vaughn then it submit the vaughn. If something revenge the melonie then the melonie is motive. If something revenge the vaughn and the vaughn is drizzly then the vaughn revenge the melonie. If something is motive then it revenge the melonie. If something is consultive and tongueless then it submit the vaughn. If something revenge the melonie then it revenge the vaughn. The vaughn is not consultive.", "logic": "\nRevenge(vaughn, melonie)\nSubmit(melonie, vaughn)\nRivet(melonie, vaughn)\nforall x (Rivet(x, vaughn) -> Submit(x, vaughn))\nforall x (Revenge(x, melonie) -> Motive(melonie))\nforall x (Revenge(x, vaughn) and Drizzly(vaughn) -> Revenge(vaughn, melonie))\nforall x (Motive(x) -> Revenge(x, melonie))\nforall x (Consultive(x) and Tongueless(x) -> Submit(x, vaughn))\nforall x (Revenge(x, melonie) -> Revenge(x, vaughn))\n\nnot Consultive(vaughn)\n\nnot Consultive(vaughn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The kara stonewall the sebastian. The sebastian foster the kara. The sebastian moon the kara. If something moon the kara then it foster the kara. If something stonewall the sebastian then the sebastian is gripping. If something stonewall the kara and the kara is occlusive then the kara stonewall the sebastian. If something is gripping then it stonewall the sebastian. If something is affordable and untipped then it foster the kara. If something stonewall the sebastian then it stonewall the kara. The kara is untipped.", "logic": "\nStonewall(kara, sebastian)\nFoster(sebastian, kara)\nMoon(sebastian, kara)\nforall x (Moon(x, kara) -> Foster(x, kara))\nforall x (Stonewall(x, sebastian) -> Gripping(sebastian))\nforall x (Stonewall(x, kara) and Occlusive(kara) -> Stonewall(kara, sebastian))\nforall x (Gripping(x) -> Stonewall(x, sebastian))\nforall x (Affordable(x) and Untipped(x) -> Foster(x, kara))\nforall x (Stonewall(x, sebastian) -> Stonewall(x, kara))\n\nUntipped(kara)\n\nUntipped(kara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The maia henna the adey. The maia fete the thaddus. The maia does not eat the adey. The maia is not iranian. The maia does not visit the thaddus. The thaddus fete the adey. The adey henna the maia. The adey fete the maia. The adey fete the thaddus. The adey is not fiftieth. If someone henna the adey then the adey is dreaded. If someone fete the thaddus and the thaddus does not eat the maia then the maia is not fiftieth. If someone is dreaded and they do not chase the thaddus then the thaddus henna the maia. If the adey henna the maia and the adey beguile the maia then the maia fete the adey. If someone beguile the thaddus and they are dreaded then the thaddus does not eat the adey. If someone is dreaded then they are luxuriant. If someone is luxuriant and not dreaded then they visit the adey. If someone is luxuriant and not fiftieth then they visit the adey. The adey is not fiftieth.", "logic": "\nHenna(maia, adey)\nFete(maia, thaddus)\nnot Fete(maia, adey)\nnot Iranian(maia)\nnot Beguile(maia, thaddus)\nFete(thaddus, adey)\nHenna(adey, maia)\nFete(adey, maia)\nFete(adey, thaddus)\nnot Fiftieth(adey)\nforall x (Henna(x, adey) -> Dreaded(adey))\nforall x (Fete(x, thaddus) and not Fete(thaddus, maia) -> not Fiftieth(maia))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) and not Henna(x, thaddus) -> Henna(thaddus, maia))\nHenna(adey, maia) and Beguile(adey, maia) -> Fete(maia, adey)\nforall x (Beguile(x, thaddus) and Dreaded(x) -> not Fete(thaddus, adey))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) and not Dreaded(x) -> Beguile(x, adey))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) and not Fiftieth(x) -> Beguile(x, adey))\n\nnot Fiftieth(adey)\n\ntherefore not Fiftieth(adey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The willow lime the louis. The willow denounce the francene. The willow does not eat the louis. The willow is not waggish. The willow does not visit the francene. The francene denounce the louis. The louis lime the willow. The louis denounce the willow. The louis denounce the francene. The louis is not senatorial. If someone lime the louis then the louis is continent. If someone denounce the francene and the francene does not eat the willow then the willow is not senatorial. If someone is continent and they do not chase the francene then the francene lime the willow. If the louis lime the willow and the louis display the willow then the willow denounce the louis. If someone display the francene and they are continent then the francene does not eat the louis. If someone is continent then they are amiable. If someone is amiable and not continent then they visit the louis. If someone is amiable and not senatorial then they visit the louis. The louis does not chase the willow.", "logic": "\nLime(willow, louis)\nDenounce(willow, francene)\nnot Denounce(willow, louis)\nnot Waggish(willow)\nnot Display(willow, francene)\nDenounce(francene, louis)\nLime(louis, willow)\nDenounce(louis, willow)\nDenounce(louis, francene)\nnot Senatorial(louis)\nforall x (Lime(x, louis) -> Continent(louis))\nforall x (Denounce(x, francene) and not Denounce(francene, willow) -> not Senatorial(willow))\nforall x (Continent(x) and not Lime(x, francene) -> Lime(francene, willow))\nLime(louis, willow) and Display(louis, willow) -> Denounce(willow, louis)\nforall x (Display(x, francene) and Continent(x) -> not Denounce(francene, louis))\nforall x (Continent(x) -> Amiable(x))\nforall x (Amiable(x) and not Continent(x) -> Display(x, louis))\nforall x (Amiable(x) and not Senatorial(x) -> Display(x, louis))\n\nnot Lime(louis, willow)\n\ntherefore Lime(louis, willow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The charis unbosom the renate. The charis require the harli. The charis does not eat the renate. The charis is not hind. The charis does not visit the harli. The harli require the renate. The renate unbosom the charis. The renate require the charis. The renate require the harli. The renate is not anaphasic. If someone unbosom the renate then the renate is polynomial. If someone require the harli and the harli does not eat the charis then the charis is not anaphasic. If someone is polynomial and they do not chase the harli then the harli unbosom the charis. If the renate unbosom the charis and the renate constitute the charis then the charis require the renate. If someone constitute the harli and they are polynomial then the harli does not eat the renate. If someone is polynomial then they are unfueled. If someone is unfueled and not polynomial then they visit the renate. If someone is unfueled and not anaphasic then they visit the renate. The renate is polynomial.", "logic": "\nUnbosom(charis, renate)\nRequire(charis, harli)\nnot Require(charis, renate)\nnot Hind(charis)\nnot Constitute(charis, harli)\nRequire(harli, renate)\nUnbosom(renate, charis)\nRequire(renate, charis)\nRequire(renate, harli)\nnot Anaphasic(renate)\nforall x (Unbosom(x, renate) -> Polynomial(renate))\nforall x (Require(x, harli) and not Require(harli, charis) -> not Anaphasic(charis))\nforall x (Polynomial(x) and not Unbosom(x, harli) -> Unbosom(harli, charis))\nUnbosom(renate, charis) and Constitute(renate, charis) -> Require(charis, renate)\nforall x (Constitute(x, harli) and Polynomial(x) -> not Require(harli, renate))\nforall x (Polynomial(x) -> Unfueled(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and not Polynomial(x) -> Constitute(x, renate))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and not Anaphasic(x) -> Constitute(x, renate))\n\nPolynomial(renate)\n\nUnbosom(charis, renate) and forall x (Unbosom(x, renate) -> Polynomial(renate)) -> therefore Polynomial(renate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The parwane grieve the corrine. The parwane barrack the kalila. The parwane does not eat the corrine. The parwane is not tentacular. The parwane does not visit the kalila. The kalila barrack the corrine. The corrine grieve the parwane. The corrine barrack the parwane. The corrine barrack the kalila. The corrine is not postictal. If someone grieve the corrine then the corrine is sublunary. If someone barrack the kalila and the kalila does not eat the parwane then the parwane is not postictal. If someone is sublunary and they do not chase the kalila then the kalila grieve the parwane. If the corrine grieve the parwane and the corrine detrain the parwane then the parwane barrack the corrine. If someone detrain the kalila and they are sublunary then the kalila does not eat the corrine. If someone is sublunary then they are signed. If someone is signed and not sublunary then they visit the corrine. If someone is signed and not postictal then they visit the corrine. The corrine is not sublunary.", "logic": "\nGrieve(parwane, corrine)\nBarrack(parwane, kalila)\nnot Barrack(parwane, corrine)\nnot Tentacular(parwane)\nnot Detrain(parwane, kalila)\nBarrack(kalila, corrine)\nGrieve(corrine, parwane)\nBarrack(corrine, parwane)\nBarrack(corrine, kalila)\nnot Postictal(corrine)\nforall x (Grieve(x, corrine) -> Sublunary(corrine))\nforall x (Barrack(x, kalila) and not Barrack(kalila, parwane) -> not Postictal(parwane))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) and not Grieve(x, kalila) -> Grieve(kalila, parwane))\nGrieve(corrine, parwane) and Detrain(corrine, parwane) -> Barrack(parwane, corrine)\nforall x (Detrain(x, kalila) and Sublunary(x) -> not Barrack(kalila, corrine))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) -> Signed(x))\nforall x (Signed(x) and not Sublunary(x) -> Detrain(x, corrine))\nforall x (Signed(x) and not Postictal(x) -> Detrain(x, corrine))\n\nnot Sublunary(corrine)\n\nGrieve(parwane, corrine) and forall x (Grieve(x, corrine) -> Sublunary(corrine)) -> therefore Sublunary(corrine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The robinia frequent the april. The robinia pucker the koren. The robinia does not eat the april. The robinia is not flossy. The robinia does not visit the koren. The koren pucker the april. The april frequent the robinia. The april pucker the robinia. The april pucker the koren. The april is not directed. If someone frequent the april then the april is wicked. If someone pucker the koren and the koren does not eat the robinia then the robinia is not directed. If someone is wicked and they do not chase the koren then the koren frequent the robinia. If the april frequent the robinia and the april encrust the robinia then the robinia pucker the april. If someone encrust the koren and they are wicked then the koren does not eat the april. If someone is wicked then they are shoddy. If someone is shoddy and not wicked then they visit the april. If someone is shoddy and not directed then they visit the april. The april is shoddy.", "logic": "\nFrequent(robinia, april)\nPucker(robinia, koren)\nnot Pucker(robinia, april)\nnot Flossy(robinia)\nnot Encrust(robinia, koren)\nPucker(koren, april)\nFrequent(april, robinia)\nPucker(april, robinia)\nPucker(april, koren)\nnot Directed(april)\nforall x (Frequent(x, april) -> Wicked(april))\nforall x (Pucker(x, koren) and not Pucker(koren, robinia) -> not Directed(robinia))\nforall x (Wicked(x) and not Frequent(x, koren) -> Frequent(koren, robinia))\nFrequent(april, robinia) and Encrust(april, robinia) -> Pucker(robinia, april)\nforall x (Encrust(x, koren) and Wicked(x) -> not Pucker(koren, april))\nforall x (Wicked(x) -> Shoddy(x))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) and not Wicked(x) -> Encrust(x, april))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) and not Directed(x) -> Encrust(x, april))\n\nShoddy(april)\n\nFrequent(robinia, april) and forall x (Frequent(x, april) -> Wicked(april)) -> therefore Wicked(april) Wicked(april) and forall x (Wicked(x) -> Shoddy(x)) -> therefore Shoddy(april)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The arturo bolster the marshal. The arturo crowd the sol. The arturo does not eat the marshal. The arturo is not iodinated. The arturo does not visit the sol. The sol crowd the marshal. The marshal bolster the arturo. The marshal crowd the arturo. The marshal crowd the sol. The marshal is not incurved. If someone bolster the marshal then the marshal is burmese. If someone crowd the sol and the sol does not eat the arturo then the arturo is not incurved. If someone is burmese and they do not chase the sol then the sol bolster the arturo. If the marshal bolster the arturo and the marshal mottle the arturo then the arturo crowd the marshal. If someone mottle the sol and they are burmese then the sol does not eat the marshal. If someone is burmese then they are labeled. If someone is labeled and not burmese then they visit the marshal. If someone is labeled and not incurved then they visit the marshal. The marshal is not labeled.", "logic": "\nBolster(arturo, marshal)\nCrowd(arturo, sol)\nnot Crowd(arturo, marshal)\nnot Iodinated(arturo)\nnot Mottle(arturo, sol)\nCrowd(sol, marshal)\nBolster(marshal, arturo)\nCrowd(marshal, arturo)\nCrowd(marshal, sol)\nnot Incurved(marshal)\nforall x (Bolster(x, marshal) -> Burmese(marshal))\nforall x (Crowd(x, sol) and not Crowd(sol, arturo) -> not Incurved(arturo))\nforall x (Burmese(x) and not Bolster(x, sol) -> Bolster(sol, arturo))\nBolster(marshal, arturo) and Mottle(marshal, arturo) -> Crowd(arturo, marshal)\nforall x (Mottle(x, sol) and Burmese(x) -> not Crowd(sol, marshal))\nforall x (Burmese(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Labeled(x) and not Burmese(x) -> Mottle(x, marshal))\nforall x (Labeled(x) and not Incurved(x) -> Mottle(x, marshal))\n\nnot Labeled(marshal)\n\nBolster(arturo, marshal) and forall x (Bolster(x, marshal) -> Burmese(marshal)) -> therefore Burmese(marshal) Burmese(marshal) and forall x (Burmese(x) -> Labeled(x)) -> therefore Labeled(marshal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The siobhan crook the gustie. The siobhan envy the celie. The siobhan does not eat the gustie. The siobhan is not sprigged. The siobhan does not visit the celie. The celie envy the gustie. The gustie crook the siobhan. The gustie envy the siobhan. The gustie envy the celie. The gustie is not celestial. If someone crook the gustie then the gustie is overhanded. If someone envy the celie and the celie does not eat the siobhan then the siobhan is not celestial. If someone is overhanded and they do not chase the celie then the celie crook the siobhan. If the gustie crook the siobhan and the gustie connect the siobhan then the siobhan envy the gustie. If someone connect the celie and they are overhanded then the celie does not eat the gustie. If someone is overhanded then they are airborne. If someone is airborne and not overhanded then they visit the gustie. If someone is airborne and not celestial then they visit the gustie. The gustie connect the gustie.", "logic": "\nCrook(siobhan, gustie)\nEnvy(siobhan, celie)\nnot Envy(siobhan, gustie)\nnot Sprigged(siobhan)\nnot Connect(siobhan, celie)\nEnvy(celie, gustie)\nCrook(gustie, siobhan)\nEnvy(gustie, siobhan)\nEnvy(gustie, celie)\nnot Celestial(gustie)\nforall x (Crook(x, gustie) -> Overhanded(gustie))\nforall x (Envy(x, celie) and not Envy(celie, siobhan) -> not Celestial(siobhan))\nforall x (Overhanded(x) and not Crook(x, celie) -> Crook(celie, siobhan))\nCrook(gustie, siobhan) and Connect(gustie, siobhan) -> Envy(siobhan, gustie)\nforall x (Connect(x, celie) and Overhanded(x) -> not Envy(celie, gustie))\nforall x (Overhanded(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) and not Overhanded(x) -> Connect(x, gustie))\nforall x (Airborne(x) and not Celestial(x) -> Connect(x, gustie))\n\nConnect(gustie, gustie)\n\nCrook(siobhan, gustie) and forall x (Crook(x, gustie) -> Overhanded(gustie)) -> therefore Overhanded(gustie) Overhanded(gustie) and forall x (Overhanded(x) -> Airborne(x)) -> therefore Airborne(gustie) Airborne(gustie) and not Celestial(gustie) and forall x (Airborne(x) and not Celestial(x) -> Connect(x, gustie)) -> therefore Connect(gustie, gustie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The bird sponge the gloriane. The bird align the marty. The bird does not eat the gloriane. The bird is not rebellious. The bird does not visit the marty. The marty align the gloriane. The gloriane sponge the bird. The gloriane align the bird. The gloriane align the marty. The gloriane is not anserine. If someone sponge the gloriane then the gloriane is labelled. If someone align the marty and the marty does not eat the bird then the bird is not anserine. If someone is labelled and they do not chase the marty then the marty sponge the bird. If the gloriane sponge the bird and the gloriane mildew the bird then the bird align the gloriane. If someone mildew the marty and they are labelled then the marty does not eat the gloriane. If someone is labelled then they are acherontic. If someone is acherontic and not labelled then they visit the gloriane. If someone is acherontic and not anserine then they visit the gloriane. The gloriane does not visit the gloriane.", "logic": "\nSponge(bird, gloriane)\nAlign(bird, marty)\nnot Align(bird, gloriane)\nnot Rebellious(bird)\nnot Mildew(bird, marty)\nAlign(marty, gloriane)\nSponge(gloriane, bird)\nAlign(gloriane, bird)\nAlign(gloriane, marty)\nnot Anserine(gloriane)\nforall x (Sponge(x, gloriane) -> Labelled(gloriane))\nforall x (Align(x, marty) and not Align(marty, bird) -> not Anserine(bird))\nforall x (Labelled(x) and not Sponge(x, marty) -> Sponge(marty, bird))\nSponge(gloriane, bird) and Mildew(gloriane, bird) -> Align(bird, gloriane)\nforall x (Mildew(x, marty) and Labelled(x) -> not Align(marty, gloriane))\nforall x (Labelled(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Acherontic(x) and not Labelled(x) -> Mildew(x, gloriane))\nforall x (Acherontic(x) and not Anserine(x) -> Mildew(x, gloriane))\n\nnot Mildew(gloriane, gloriane)\n\nSponge(bird, gloriane) and forall x (Sponge(x, gloriane) -> Labelled(gloriane)) -> therefore Labelled(gloriane) Labelled(gloriane) and forall x (Labelled(x) -> Acherontic(x)) -> therefore Acherontic(gloriane) Acherontic(gloriane) and not Anserine(gloriane) and forall x (Acherontic(x) and not Anserine(x) -> Mildew(x, gloriane)) -> therefore Mildew(gloriane, gloriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The arline rappel the chevy. The arline citify the maris. The arline does not eat the chevy. The arline is not unquotable. The arline does not visit the maris. The maris citify the chevy. The chevy rappel the arline. The chevy citify the arline. The chevy citify the maris. The chevy is not taut. If someone rappel the chevy then the chevy is crucial. If someone citify the maris and the maris does not eat the arline then the arline is not taut. If someone is crucial and they do not chase the maris then the maris rappel the arline. If the chevy rappel the arline and the chevy oversleep the arline then the arline citify the chevy. If someone oversleep the maris and they are crucial then the maris does not eat the chevy. If someone is crucial then they are uttered. If someone is uttered and not crucial then they visit the chevy. If someone is uttered and not taut then they visit the chevy. The maris does not visit the chevy.", "logic": "\nRappel(arline, chevy)\nCitify(arline, maris)\nnot Citify(arline, chevy)\nnot Unquotable(arline)\nnot Oversleep(arline, maris)\nCitify(maris, chevy)\nRappel(chevy, arline)\nCitify(chevy, arline)\nCitify(chevy, maris)\nnot Taut(chevy)\nforall x (Rappel(x, chevy) -> Crucial(chevy))\nforall x (Citify(x, maris) and not Citify(maris, arline) -> not Taut(arline))\nforall x (Crucial(x) and not Rappel(x, maris) -> Rappel(maris, arline))\nRappel(chevy, arline) and Oversleep(chevy, arline) -> Citify(arline, chevy)\nforall x (Oversleep(x, maris) and Crucial(x) -> not Citify(maris, chevy))\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Uttered(x))\nforall x (Uttered(x) and not Crucial(x) -> Oversleep(x, chevy))\nforall x (Uttered(x) and not Taut(x) -> Oversleep(x, chevy))\n\nnot Oversleep(maris, chevy)\n\nforall x (Uttered(x) and not Crucial(x) -> Oversleep(x, chevy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The lucretia bestialise the philly. The lucretia bate the loise. The lucretia does not eat the philly. The lucretia is not megascopic. The lucretia does not visit the loise. The loise bate the philly. The philly bestialise the lucretia. The philly bate the lucretia. The philly bate the loise. The philly is not undressed. If someone bestialise the philly then the philly is depilous. If someone bate the loise and the loise does not eat the lucretia then the lucretia is not undressed. If someone is depilous and they do not chase the loise then the loise bestialise the lucretia. If the philly bestialise the lucretia and the philly oscillate the lucretia then the lucretia bate the philly. If someone oscillate the loise and they are depilous then the loise does not eat the philly. If someone is depilous then they are innate. If someone is innate and not depilous then they visit the philly. If someone is innate and not undressed then they visit the philly. The loise bestialise the lucretia.", "logic": "\nBestialise(lucretia, philly)\nBate(lucretia, loise)\nnot Bate(lucretia, philly)\nnot Megascopic(lucretia)\nnot Oscillate(lucretia, loise)\nBate(loise, philly)\nBestialise(philly, lucretia)\nBate(philly, lucretia)\nBate(philly, loise)\nnot Undressed(philly)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, philly) -> Depilous(philly))\nforall x (Bate(x, loise) and not Bate(loise, lucretia) -> not Undressed(lucretia))\nforall x (Depilous(x) and not Bestialise(x, loise) -> Bestialise(loise, lucretia))\nBestialise(philly, lucretia) and Oscillate(philly, lucretia) -> Bate(lucretia, philly)\nforall x (Oscillate(x, loise) and Depilous(x) -> not Bate(loise, philly))\nforall x (Depilous(x) -> Innate(x))\nforall x (Innate(x) and not Depilous(x) -> Oscillate(x, philly))\nforall x (Innate(x) and not Undressed(x) -> Oscillate(x, philly))\n\nBestialise(loise, lucretia)\n\nforall x (Depilous(x) and not Bestialise(x, loise) -> Bestialise(loise, lucretia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The clint chiromance the bunnie. The clint transact the holli. The clint does not eat the bunnie. The clint is not whiskered. The clint does not visit the holli. The holli transact the bunnie. The bunnie chiromance the clint. The bunnie transact the clint. The bunnie transact the holli. The bunnie is not cuneal. If someone chiromance the bunnie then the bunnie is snorty. If someone transact the holli and the holli does not eat the clint then the clint is not cuneal. If someone is snorty and they do not chase the holli then the holli chiromance the clint. If the bunnie chiromance the clint and the bunnie await the clint then the clint transact the bunnie. If someone await the holli and they are snorty then the holli does not eat the bunnie. If someone is snorty then they are accusative. If someone is accusative and not snorty then they visit the bunnie. If someone is accusative and not cuneal then they visit the bunnie. The clint does not visit the bunnie.", "logic": "\nChiromance(clint, bunnie)\nTransact(clint, holli)\nnot Transact(clint, bunnie)\nnot Whiskered(clint)\nnot Await(clint, holli)\nTransact(holli, bunnie)\nChiromance(bunnie, clint)\nTransact(bunnie, clint)\nTransact(bunnie, holli)\nnot Cuneal(bunnie)\nforall x (Chiromance(x, bunnie) -> Snorty(bunnie))\nforall x (Transact(x, holli) and not Transact(holli, clint) -> not Cuneal(clint))\nforall x (Snorty(x) and not Chiromance(x, holli) -> Chiromance(holli, clint))\nChiromance(bunnie, clint) and Await(bunnie, clint) -> Transact(clint, bunnie)\nforall x (Await(x, holli) and Snorty(x) -> not Transact(holli, bunnie))\nforall x (Snorty(x) -> Accusative(x))\nforall x (Accusative(x) and not Snorty(x) -> Await(x, bunnie))\nforall x (Accusative(x) and not Cuneal(x) -> Await(x, bunnie))\n\nnot Await(clint, bunnie)\n\nforall x (Accusative(x) and not Snorty(x) -> Await(x, bunnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The tod ration the shalne. The tod romp the pearla. The tod does not eat the shalne. The tod is not bountiful. The tod does not visit the pearla. The pearla romp the shalne. The shalne ration the tod. The shalne romp the tod. The shalne romp the pearla. The shalne is not prosodic. If someone ration the shalne then the shalne is alight. If someone romp the pearla and the pearla does not eat the tod then the tod is not prosodic. If someone is alight and they do not chase the pearla then the pearla ration the tod. If the shalne ration the tod and the shalne oxidize the tod then the tod romp the shalne. If someone oxidize the pearla and they are alight then the pearla does not eat the shalne. If someone is alight then they are pinkish. If someone is pinkish and not alight then they visit the shalne. If someone is pinkish and not prosodic then they visit the shalne. The tod is pinkish.", "logic": "\nRation(tod, shalne)\nRomp(tod, pearla)\nnot Romp(tod, shalne)\nnot Bountiful(tod)\nnot Oxidize(tod, pearla)\nRomp(pearla, shalne)\nRation(shalne, tod)\nRomp(shalne, tod)\nRomp(shalne, pearla)\nnot Prosodic(shalne)\nforall x (Ration(x, shalne) -> Alight(shalne))\nforall x (Romp(x, pearla) and not Romp(pearla, tod) -> not Prosodic(tod))\nforall x (Alight(x) and not Ration(x, pearla) -> Ration(pearla, tod))\nRation(shalne, tod) and Oxidize(shalne, tod) -> Romp(tod, shalne)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, pearla) and Alight(x) -> not Romp(pearla, shalne))\nforall x (Alight(x) -> Pinkish(x))\nforall x (Pinkish(x) and not Alight(x) -> Oxidize(x, shalne))\nforall x (Pinkish(x) and not Prosodic(x) -> Oxidize(x, shalne))\n\nPinkish(tod)\n\nforall x (Alight(x) -> Pinkish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The aleck wave the wallis. The aleck couple the layton. The aleck does not eat the wallis. The aleck is not wearied. The aleck does not visit the layton. The layton couple the wallis. The wallis wave the aleck. The wallis couple the aleck. The wallis couple the layton. The wallis is not binary. If someone wave the wallis then the wallis is witchlike. If someone couple the layton and the layton does not eat the aleck then the aleck is not binary. If someone is witchlike and they do not chase the layton then the layton wave the aleck. If the wallis wave the aleck and the wallis retain the aleck then the aleck couple the wallis. If someone retain the layton and they are witchlike then the layton does not eat the wallis. If someone is witchlike then they are fetid. If someone is fetid and not witchlike then they visit the wallis. If someone is fetid and not binary then they visit the wallis. The layton is not wearied.", "logic": "\nWave(aleck, wallis)\nCouple(aleck, layton)\nnot Couple(aleck, wallis)\nnot Wearied(aleck)\nnot Retain(aleck, layton)\nCouple(layton, wallis)\nWave(wallis, aleck)\nCouple(wallis, aleck)\nCouple(wallis, layton)\nnot Binary(wallis)\nforall x (Wave(x, wallis) -> Witchlike(wallis))\nforall x (Couple(x, layton) and not Couple(layton, aleck) -> not Binary(aleck))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) and not Wave(x, layton) -> Wave(layton, aleck))\nWave(wallis, aleck) and Retain(wallis, aleck) -> Couple(aleck, wallis)\nforall x (Retain(x, layton) and Witchlike(x) -> not Couple(layton, wallis))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) -> Fetid(x))\nforall x (Fetid(x) and not Witchlike(x) -> Retain(x, wallis))\nforall x (Fetid(x) and not Binary(x) -> Retain(x, wallis))\n\nnot Wearied(layton)\n\nnot Wearied(layton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The aube expand the bronson. The aube bonderize the cooper. The aube does not eat the bronson. The aube is not serpentine. The aube does not visit the cooper. The cooper bonderize the bronson. The bronson expand the aube. The bronson bonderize the aube. The bronson bonderize the cooper. The bronson is not antic. If someone expand the bronson then the bronson is sloping. If someone bonderize the cooper and the cooper does not eat the aube then the aube is not antic. If someone is sloping and they do not chase the cooper then the cooper expand the aube. If the bronson expand the aube and the bronson undercoat the aube then the aube bonderize the bronson. If someone undercoat the cooper and they are sloping then the cooper does not eat the bronson. If someone is sloping then they are naif. If someone is naif and not sloping then they visit the bronson. If someone is naif and not antic then they visit the bronson. The cooper is antic.", "logic": "\nExpand(aube, bronson)\nBonderize(aube, cooper)\nnot Bonderize(aube, bronson)\nnot Serpentine(aube)\nnot Undercoat(aube, cooper)\nBonderize(cooper, bronson)\nExpand(bronson, aube)\nBonderize(bronson, aube)\nBonderize(bronson, cooper)\nnot Antic(bronson)\nforall x (Expand(x, bronson) -> Sloping(bronson))\nforall x (Bonderize(x, cooper) and not Bonderize(cooper, aube) -> not Antic(aube))\nforall x (Sloping(x) and not Expand(x, cooper) -> Expand(cooper, aube))\nExpand(bronson, aube) and Undercoat(bronson, aube) -> Bonderize(aube, bronson)\nforall x (Undercoat(x, cooper) and Sloping(x) -> not Bonderize(cooper, bronson))\nforall x (Sloping(x) -> Naif(x))\nforall x (Naif(x) and not Sloping(x) -> Undercoat(x, bronson))\nforall x (Naif(x) and not Antic(x) -> Undercoat(x, bronson))\n\nAntic(cooper)\n\nAntic(cooper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The reiko slalom the welby. The reiko table the pablo. The reiko does not eat the welby. The reiko is not walking. The reiko does not visit the pablo. The pablo table the welby. The welby slalom the reiko. The welby table the reiko. The welby table the pablo. The welby is not mantic. If someone slalom the welby then the welby is xxii. If someone table the pablo and the pablo does not eat the reiko then the reiko is not mantic. If someone is xxii and they do not chase the pablo then the pablo slalom the reiko. If the welby slalom the reiko and the welby gluttonize the reiko then the reiko table the welby. If someone gluttonize the pablo and they are xxii then the pablo does not eat the welby. If someone is xxii then they are awake. If someone is awake and not xxii then they visit the welby. If someone is awake and not mantic then they visit the welby. The welby does not eat the welby.", "logic": "\nSlalom(reiko, welby)\nTable(reiko, pablo)\nnot Table(reiko, welby)\nnot Walking(reiko)\nnot Gluttonize(reiko, pablo)\nTable(pablo, welby)\nSlalom(welby, reiko)\nTable(welby, reiko)\nTable(welby, pablo)\nnot Mantic(welby)\nforall x (Slalom(x, welby) -> Xxii(welby))\nforall x (Table(x, pablo) and not Table(pablo, reiko) -> not Mantic(reiko))\nforall x (Xxii(x) and not Slalom(x, pablo) -> Slalom(pablo, reiko))\nSlalom(welby, reiko) and Gluttonize(welby, reiko) -> Table(reiko, welby)\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, pablo) and Xxii(x) -> not Table(pablo, welby))\nforall x (Xxii(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) and not Xxii(x) -> Gluttonize(x, welby))\nforall x (Awake(x) and not Mantic(x) -> Gluttonize(x, welby))\n\nnot Table(welby, welby)\n\nnot Table(welby, welby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The shirline yarn the ashish. The shirline crayon the anneliese. The shirline does not eat the ashish. The shirline is not unheeding. The shirline does not visit the anneliese. The anneliese crayon the ashish. The ashish yarn the shirline. The ashish crayon the shirline. The ashish crayon the anneliese. The ashish is not illative. If someone yarn the ashish then the ashish is opulent. If someone crayon the anneliese and the anneliese does not eat the shirline then the shirline is not illative. If someone is opulent and they do not chase the anneliese then the anneliese yarn the shirline. If the ashish yarn the shirline and the ashish enslave the shirline then the shirline crayon the ashish. If someone enslave the anneliese and they are opulent then the anneliese does not eat the ashish. If someone is opulent then they are mayoral. If someone is mayoral and not opulent then they visit the ashish. If someone is mayoral and not illative then they visit the ashish. The shirline yarn the anneliese.", "logic": "\nYarn(shirline, ashish)\nCrayon(shirline, anneliese)\nnot Crayon(shirline, ashish)\nnot Unheeding(shirline)\nnot Enslave(shirline, anneliese)\nCrayon(anneliese, ashish)\nYarn(ashish, shirline)\nCrayon(ashish, shirline)\nCrayon(ashish, anneliese)\nnot Illative(ashish)\nforall x (Yarn(x, ashish) -> Opulent(ashish))\nforall x (Crayon(x, anneliese) and not Crayon(anneliese, shirline) -> not Illative(shirline))\nforall x (Opulent(x) and not Yarn(x, anneliese) -> Yarn(anneliese, shirline))\nYarn(ashish, shirline) and Enslave(ashish, shirline) -> Crayon(shirline, ashish)\nforall x (Enslave(x, anneliese) and Opulent(x) -> not Crayon(anneliese, ashish))\nforall x (Opulent(x) -> Mayoral(x))\nforall x (Mayoral(x) and not Opulent(x) -> Enslave(x, ashish))\nforall x (Mayoral(x) and not Illative(x) -> Enslave(x, ashish))\n\nYarn(shirline, anneliese)\n\nYarn(shirline, anneliese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "Paule is parked. Eula is wounded. Eula is gastric. If Eula is wounded and Eula is gastric then Eula is minus. If someone is witchlike and imbricated then they are gastric. Young people are witchlike. Kind people are imbricated. Young, distrait people are parked. If Eula is minus then Eula is distrait. Eula is wounded.", "logic": "\nParked(paule)\nWounded(eula)\nGastric(eula)\nWounded(eula) and Gastric(eula) -> Minus(eula)\nforall x (Witchlike(x) and Imbricated(x) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Imbricated(x) -> Witchlike(x))\nforall x (Gastric(x) -> Imbricated(x))\nforall x (Imbricated(x) and Distrait(x) -> Parked(x))\nMinus(eula) -> Distrait(eula)\n\nWounded(eula)\n\ntherefore Wounded(eula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Tedda is malian. Billie is uncrannied. Billie is posted. If Billie is uncrannied and Billie is posted then Billie is spic. If someone is recursive and neurotoxic then they are posted. Young people are recursive. Kind people are neurotoxic. Young, iodized people are malian. If Billie is spic then Billie is iodized. Tedda is not malian.", "logic": "\nMalian(tedda)\nUncrannied(billie)\nPosted(billie)\nUncrannied(billie) and Posted(billie) -> Spic(billie)\nforall x (Recursive(x) and Neurotoxic(x) -> Posted(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> Recursive(x))\nforall x (Posted(x) -> Neurotoxic(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) and Iodized(x) -> Malian(x))\nSpic(billie) -> Iodized(billie)\n\nnot Malian(tedda)\n\ntherefore Malian(tedda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Elene is riblike. Alla is degenerate. Alla is confident. If Alla is degenerate and Alla is confident then Alla is lubricated. If someone is crustlike and accoutred then they are confident. Young people are crustlike. Kind people are accoutred. Young, advertent people are riblike. If Alla is lubricated then Alla is advertent. Alla is lubricated.", "logic": "\nRiblike(elene)\nDegenerate(alla)\nConfident(alla)\nDegenerate(alla) and Confident(alla) -> Lubricated(alla)\nforall x (Crustlike(x) and Accoutred(x) -> Confident(x))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) -> Crustlike(x))\nforall x (Confident(x) -> Accoutred(x))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) and Advertent(x) -> Riblike(x))\nLubricated(alla) -> Advertent(alla)\n\nLubricated(alla)\n\nDegenerate(alla) and Confident(alla) and Degenerate(alla) and Confident(alla) -> Lubricated(alla) -> therefore Lubricated(alla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Rusty is gullible. Kary is bladdery. Kary is judaic. If Kary is bladdery and Kary is judaic then Kary is shipshape. If someone is blown and unequipped then they are judaic. Young people are blown. Kind people are unequipped. Young, fijian people are gullible. If Kary is shipshape then Kary is fijian. Kary is not unequipped.", "logic": "\nGullible(rusty)\nBladdery(kary)\nJudaic(kary)\nBladdery(kary) and Judaic(kary) -> Shipshape(kary)\nforall x (Blown(x) and Unequipped(x) -> Judaic(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Blown(x))\nforall x (Judaic(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) and Fijian(x) -> Gullible(x))\nShipshape(kary) -> Fijian(kary)\n\nnot Unequipped(kary)\n\nJudaic(kary) and forall x (Judaic(x) -> Unequipped(x)) -> therefore Unequipped(kary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Jimmy is voltaic. Samuella is otiose. Samuella is written. If Samuella is otiose and Samuella is written then Samuella is faddy. If someone is milled and unuseable then they are written. Young people are milled. Kind people are unuseable. Young, pizzicato people are voltaic. If Samuella is faddy then Samuella is pizzicato. Samuella is pizzicato.", "logic": "\nVoltaic(jimmy)\nOtiose(samuella)\nWritten(samuella)\nOtiose(samuella) and Written(samuella) -> Faddy(samuella)\nforall x (Milled(x) and Unuseable(x) -> Written(x))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) -> Milled(x))\nforall x (Written(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) and Pizzicato(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nFaddy(samuella) -> Pizzicato(samuella)\n\nPizzicato(samuella)\n\nOtiose(samuella) and Written(samuella) and Otiose(samuella) and Written(samuella) -> Faddy(samuella) -> therefore Faddy(samuella) Faddy(samuella) and Faddy(samuella) -> Pizzicato(samuella) -> therefore Pizzicato(samuella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Hamlin is approving. Annetta is duncish. Annetta is biannual. If Annetta is duncish and Annetta is biannual then Annetta is nonechoic. If someone is honest and astute then they are biannual. Young people are honest. Kind people are astute. Young, detestable people are approving. If Annetta is nonechoic then Annetta is detestable. Annetta is not honest.", "logic": "\nApproving(hamlin)\nDuncish(annetta)\nBiannual(annetta)\nDuncish(annetta) and Biannual(annetta) -> Nonechoic(annetta)\nforall x (Honest(x) and Astute(x) -> Biannual(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) -> Honest(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) -> Astute(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) and Detestable(x) -> Approving(x))\nNonechoic(annetta) -> Detestable(annetta)\n\nnot Honest(annetta)\n\nBiannual(annetta) and forall x (Biannual(x) -> Astute(x)) -> therefore Astute(annetta) Astute(annetta) and forall x (Astute(x) -> Honest(x)) -> therefore Honest(annetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Broddy is impolite. Tiffany is total. Tiffany is apheretic. If Tiffany is total and Tiffany is apheretic then Tiffany is vivace. If someone is onside and chemical then they are apheretic. Young people are onside. Kind people are chemical. Young, viewable people are impolite. If Tiffany is vivace then Tiffany is viewable. Tiffany is impolite.", "logic": "\nImpolite(broddy)\nTotal(tiffany)\nApheretic(tiffany)\nTotal(tiffany) and Apheretic(tiffany) -> Vivace(tiffany)\nforall x (Onside(x) and Chemical(x) -> Apheretic(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Onside(x))\nforall x (Apheretic(x) -> Chemical(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) and Viewable(x) -> Impolite(x))\nVivace(tiffany) -> Viewable(tiffany)\n\nImpolite(tiffany)\n\nApheretic(tiffany) and forall x (Apheretic(x) -> Chemical(x)) -> therefore Chemical(tiffany) Total(tiffany) and Apheretic(tiffany) and Total(tiffany) and Apheretic(tiffany) -> Vivace(tiffany) -> therefore Vivace(tiffany) Vivace(tiffany) and Vivace(tiffany) -> Viewable(tiffany) -> therefore Viewable(tiffany) Chemical(tiffany) and Viewable(tiffany) and forall x (Chemical(x) and Viewable(x) -> Impolite(x)) -> therefore Impolite(tiffany)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Andi is unmovable. Huntley is enchanted. Huntley is unsworn. If Huntley is enchanted and Huntley is unsworn then Huntley is latticed. If someone is diarrhoeal and inward then they are unsworn. Young people are diarrhoeal. Kind people are inward. Young, unfeeling people are unmovable. If Huntley is latticed then Huntley is unfeeling. Huntley is not unmovable.", "logic": "\nUnmovable(andi)\nEnchanted(huntley)\nUnsworn(huntley)\nEnchanted(huntley) and Unsworn(huntley) -> Latticed(huntley)\nforall x (Diarrhoeal(x) and Inward(x) -> Unsworn(x))\nforall x (Inward(x) -> Diarrhoeal(x))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Unfeeling(x) -> Unmovable(x))\nLatticed(huntley) -> Unfeeling(huntley)\n\nnot Unmovable(huntley)\n\nUnsworn(huntley) and forall x (Unsworn(x) -> Inward(x)) -> therefore Inward(huntley) Enchanted(huntley) and Unsworn(huntley) and Enchanted(huntley) and Unsworn(huntley) -> Latticed(huntley) -> therefore Latticed(huntley) Latticed(huntley) and Latticed(huntley) -> Unfeeling(huntley) -> therefore Unfeeling(huntley) Inward(huntley) and Unfeeling(huntley) and forall x (Inward(x) and Unfeeling(x) -> Unmovable(x)) -> therefore Unmovable(huntley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Chadwick is discarded. Roana is mean. Roana is startled. If Roana is mean and Roana is startled then Roana is mellow. If someone is effortless and hooklike then they are startled. Young people are effortless. Kind people are hooklike. Young, obscene people are discarded. If Roana is mellow then Roana is obscene. Chadwick is not hooklike.", "logic": "\nDiscarded(chadwick)\nMean(roana)\nStartled(roana)\nMean(roana) and Startled(roana) -> Mellow(roana)\nforall x (Effortless(x) and Hooklike(x) -> Startled(x))\nforall x (Hooklike(x) -> Effortless(x))\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Hooklike(x))\nforall x (Hooklike(x) and Obscene(x) -> Discarded(x))\nMellow(roana) -> Obscene(roana)\n\nnot Hooklike(chadwick)\n\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Hooklike(x)) <- forall x (Effortless(x) and Hooklike(x) -> Startled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Pyotr is biblical. Shepard is pejorative. Shepard is meltable. If Shepard is pejorative and Shepard is meltable then Shepard is frisian. If someone is pent and shakedown then they are meltable. Young people are pent. Kind people are shakedown. Young, fruticose people are biblical. If Shepard is frisian then Shepard is fruticose. Pyotr is pent.", "logic": "\nBiblical(pyotr)\nPejorative(shepard)\nMeltable(shepard)\nPejorative(shepard) and Meltable(shepard) -> Frisian(shepard)\nforall x (Pent(x) and Shakedown(x) -> Meltable(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Pent(x))\nforall x (Meltable(x) -> Shakedown(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) and Fruticose(x) -> Biblical(x))\nFrisian(shepard) -> Fruticose(shepard)\n\nPent(pyotr)\n\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Pent(x)) <- forall x (Meltable(x) -> Shakedown(x)) <- forall x (Pent(x) and Shakedown(x) -> Meltable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Justine is developed. Garrott is highborn. Garrott is zygotic. If Garrott is highborn and Garrott is zygotic then Garrott is snazzy. If someone is ulnar and mansard then they are zygotic. Young people are ulnar. Kind people are mansard. Young, farsighted people are developed. If Garrott is snazzy then Garrott is farsighted. Justine is not zygotic.", "logic": "\nDeveloped(justine)\nHighborn(garrott)\nZygotic(garrott)\nHighborn(garrott) and Zygotic(garrott) -> Snazzy(garrott)\nforall x (Ulnar(x) and Mansard(x) -> Zygotic(x))\nforall x (Mansard(x) -> Ulnar(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) -> Mansard(x))\nforall x (Mansard(x) and Farsighted(x) -> Developed(x))\nSnazzy(garrott) -> Farsighted(garrott)\n\nnot Zygotic(justine)\n\nforall x (Ulnar(x) and Mansard(x) -> Zygotic(x)) <- forall x (Zygotic(x) -> Mansard(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Dynah is anticlinal. Lamb is laborious. Lamb is unpressed. If Lamb is laborious and Lamb is unpressed then Lamb is resultant. If someone is satirical and principled then they are unpressed. Young people are satirical. Kind people are principled. Young, alleged people are anticlinal. If Lamb is resultant then Lamb is alleged. Dynah is resultant.", "logic": "\nAnticlinal(dynah)\nLaborious(lamb)\nUnpressed(lamb)\nLaborious(lamb) and Unpressed(lamb) -> Resultant(lamb)\nforall x (Satirical(x) and Principled(x) -> Unpressed(x))\nforall x (Principled(x) -> Satirical(x))\nforall x (Unpressed(x) -> Principled(x))\nforall x (Principled(x) and Alleged(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nResultant(lamb) -> Alleged(lamb)\n\nResultant(dynah)\n\nResultant(dynah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Katharine is blown. Modestia is duodenal. Modestia is terrible. If Modestia is duodenal and Modestia is terrible then Modestia is sociable. If someone is rubbishy and prayerful then they are terrible. Young people are rubbishy. Kind people are prayerful. Young, anosmatic people are blown. If Modestia is sociable then Modestia is anosmatic. Katharine is not anosmatic.", "logic": "\nBlown(katharine)\nDuodenal(modestia)\nTerrible(modestia)\nDuodenal(modestia) and Terrible(modestia) -> Sociable(modestia)\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) and Prayerful(x) -> Terrible(x))\nforall x (Prayerful(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\nforall x (Terrible(x) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Prayerful(x) and Anosmatic(x) -> Blown(x))\nSociable(modestia) -> Anosmatic(modestia)\n\nnot Anosmatic(katharine)\n\nnot Anosmatic(katharine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Poul is untangled. Hammad is seditious. Hammad is snazzy. If Hammad is seditious and Hammad is snazzy then Hammad is subscript. If someone is leathered and fake then they are snazzy. Young people are leathered. Kind people are fake. Young, penial people are untangled. If Hammad is subscript then Hammad is penial. Poul is seditious.", "logic": "\nUntangled(poul)\nSeditious(hammad)\nSnazzy(hammad)\nSeditious(hammad) and Snazzy(hammad) -> Subscript(hammad)\nforall x (Leathered(x) and Fake(x) -> Snazzy(x))\nforall x (Fake(x) -> Leathered(x))\nforall x (Snazzy(x) -> Fake(x))\nforall x (Fake(x) and Penial(x) -> Untangled(x))\nSubscript(hammad) -> Penial(hammad)\n\nSeditious(poul)\n\nSeditious(poul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "The wendeline is stimulated. The wendeline redefine the aprilette. The wendeline adjudge the aprilette. The wendeline adjudge the iggy. The aprilette redefine the wendeline. The iggy bypass the wendeline. The iggy is ophthalmic. The iggy is delimited. The ellen bypass the aprilette. The ellen redefine the wendeline. If someone is delimited then they like the aprilette. If someone redefine the ellen then the ellen redefine the iggy. If the ellen adjudge the aprilette and the aprilette redefine the ellen then the aprilette redefine the wendeline. If someone bypass the wendeline and they like the wendeline then they like the ellen. If the aprilette bypass the ellen and the ellen adjudge the iggy then the ellen is broody. If someone bypass the aprilette then they chase the wendeline. The iggy is delimited.", "logic": "\nStimulated(wendeline)\nRedefine(wendeline, aprilette)\nAdjudge(wendeline, aprilette)\nAdjudge(wendeline, iggy)\nRedefine(aprilette, wendeline)\nBypass(iggy, wendeline)\nOphthalmic(iggy)\nDelimited(iggy)\nBypass(ellen, aprilette)\nRedefine(ellen, wendeline)\nforall x (Delimited(x) -> Redefine(x, aprilette))\nforall x (Redefine(x, ellen) -> Redefine(ellen, iggy))\nAdjudge(ellen, aprilette) and Redefine(aprilette, ellen) -> Redefine(aprilette, wendeline)\nforall x (Bypass(x, wendeline) and Redefine(x, wendeline) -> Redefine(x, ellen))\nBypass(aprilette, ellen) and Adjudge(ellen, iggy) -> Broody(ellen)\nforall x (Bypass(x, aprilette) -> Bypass(x, wendeline))\n\nDelimited(iggy)\n\ntherefore Delimited(iggy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The fritz is pubertal. The fritz chance the shanie. The fritz inflict the shanie. The fritz inflict the mayor. The shanie chance the fritz. The mayor mine the fritz. The mayor is bicolour. The mayor is loony. The goldie mine the shanie. The goldie chance the fritz. If someone is loony then they like the shanie. If someone chance the goldie then the goldie chance the mayor. If the goldie inflict the shanie and the shanie chance the goldie then the shanie chance the fritz. If someone mine the fritz and they like the fritz then they like the goldie. If the shanie mine the goldie and the goldie inflict the mayor then the goldie is sprigged. If someone mine the shanie then they chase the fritz. The fritz is not pubertal.", "logic": "\nPubertal(fritz)\nChance(fritz, shanie)\nInflict(fritz, shanie)\nInflict(fritz, mayor)\nChance(shanie, fritz)\nMine(mayor, fritz)\nBicolour(mayor)\nLoony(mayor)\nMine(goldie, shanie)\nChance(goldie, fritz)\nforall x (Loony(x) -> Chance(x, shanie))\nforall x (Chance(x, goldie) -> Chance(goldie, mayor))\nInflict(goldie, shanie) and Chance(shanie, goldie) -> Chance(shanie, fritz)\nforall x (Mine(x, fritz) and Chance(x, fritz) -> Chance(x, goldie))\nMine(shanie, goldie) and Inflict(goldie, mayor) -> Sprigged(goldie)\nforall x (Mine(x, shanie) -> Mine(x, fritz))\n\nnot Pubertal(fritz)\n\ntherefore Pubertal(fritz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The darrin is saddled. The darrin waylay the gertrudis. The darrin enlighten the gertrudis. The darrin enlighten the adelaide. The gertrudis waylay the darrin. The adelaide tenderize the darrin. The adelaide is carbonous. The adelaide is unrepaired. The terrell tenderize the gertrudis. The terrell waylay the darrin. If someone is unrepaired then they like the gertrudis. If someone waylay the terrell then the terrell waylay the adelaide. If the terrell enlighten the gertrudis and the gertrudis waylay the terrell then the gertrudis waylay the darrin. If someone tenderize the darrin and they like the darrin then they like the terrell. If the gertrudis tenderize the terrell and the terrell enlighten the adelaide then the terrell is fanged. If someone tenderize the gertrudis then they chase the darrin. The adelaide waylay the gertrudis.", "logic": "\nSaddled(darrin)\nWaylay(darrin, gertrudis)\nEnlighten(darrin, gertrudis)\nEnlighten(darrin, adelaide)\nWaylay(gertrudis, darrin)\nTenderize(adelaide, darrin)\nCarbonous(adelaide)\nUnrepaired(adelaide)\nTenderize(terrell, gertrudis)\nWaylay(terrell, darrin)\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) -> Waylay(x, gertrudis))\nforall x (Waylay(x, terrell) -> Waylay(terrell, adelaide))\nEnlighten(terrell, gertrudis) and Waylay(gertrudis, terrell) -> Waylay(gertrudis, darrin)\nforall x (Tenderize(x, darrin) and Waylay(x, darrin) -> Waylay(x, terrell))\nTenderize(gertrudis, terrell) and Enlighten(terrell, adelaide) -> Fanged(terrell)\nforall x (Tenderize(x, gertrudis) -> Tenderize(x, darrin))\n\nWaylay(adelaide, gertrudis)\n\nUnrepaired(adelaide) and forall x (Unrepaired(x) -> Waylay(x, gertrudis)) -> therefore Waylay(adelaide, gertrudis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The sterne is appendaged. The sterne dynamise the erhard. The sterne outstare the erhard. The sterne outstare the audie. The erhard dynamise the sterne. The audie abridge the sterne. The audie is untended. The audie is catoptric. The cameron abridge the erhard. The cameron dynamise the sterne. If someone is catoptric then they like the erhard. If someone dynamise the cameron then the cameron dynamise the audie. If the cameron outstare the erhard and the erhard dynamise the cameron then the erhard dynamise the sterne. If someone abridge the sterne and they like the sterne then they like the cameron. If the erhard abridge the cameron and the cameron outstare the audie then the cameron is dutiful. If someone abridge the erhard then they chase the sterne. The cameron does not chase the sterne.", "logic": "\nAppendaged(sterne)\nDynamise(sterne, erhard)\nOutstare(sterne, erhard)\nOutstare(sterne, audie)\nDynamise(erhard, sterne)\nAbridge(audie, sterne)\nUntended(audie)\nCatoptric(audie)\nAbridge(cameron, erhard)\nDynamise(cameron, sterne)\nforall x (Catoptric(x) -> Dynamise(x, erhard))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, cameron) -> Dynamise(cameron, audie))\nOutstare(cameron, erhard) and Dynamise(erhard, cameron) -> Dynamise(erhard, sterne)\nforall x (Abridge(x, sterne) and Dynamise(x, sterne) -> Dynamise(x, cameron))\nAbridge(erhard, cameron) and Outstare(cameron, audie) -> Dutiful(cameron)\nforall x (Abridge(x, erhard) -> Abridge(x, sterne))\n\nnot Abridge(cameron, sterne)\n\nAbridge(cameron, erhard) and forall x (Abridge(x, erhard) -> Abridge(x, sterne)) -> therefore Abridge(cameron, sterne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The darya is bulgy. The darya denazify the benjamin. The darya decamp the benjamin. The darya decamp the roxie. The benjamin denazify the darya. The roxie compost the darya. The roxie is quaternate. The roxie is fetching. The roselyn compost the benjamin. The roselyn denazify the darya. If someone is fetching then they like the benjamin. If someone denazify the roselyn then the roselyn denazify the roxie. If the roselyn decamp the benjamin and the benjamin denazify the roselyn then the benjamin denazify the darya. If someone compost the darya and they like the darya then they like the roselyn. If the benjamin compost the roselyn and the roselyn decamp the roxie then the roselyn is rainy. If someone compost the benjamin then they chase the darya. The roselyn denazify the roselyn.", "logic": "\nBulgy(darya)\nDenazify(darya, benjamin)\nDecamp(darya, benjamin)\nDecamp(darya, roxie)\nDenazify(benjamin, darya)\nCompost(roxie, darya)\nQuaternate(roxie)\nFetching(roxie)\nCompost(roselyn, benjamin)\nDenazify(roselyn, darya)\nforall x (Fetching(x) -> Denazify(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Denazify(x, roselyn) -> Denazify(roselyn, roxie))\nDecamp(roselyn, benjamin) and Denazify(benjamin, roselyn) -> Denazify(benjamin, darya)\nforall x (Compost(x, darya) and Denazify(x, darya) -> Denazify(x, roselyn))\nCompost(benjamin, roselyn) and Decamp(roselyn, roxie) -> Rainy(roselyn)\nforall x (Compost(x, benjamin) -> Compost(x, darya))\n\nDenazify(roselyn, roselyn)\n\nCompost(roselyn, benjamin) and forall x (Compost(x, benjamin) -> Compost(x, darya)) -> therefore Compost(roselyn, darya) Compost(roselyn, darya) and Denazify(roselyn, darya) and forall x (Compost(x, darya) and Denazify(x, darya) -> Denazify(x, roselyn)) -> therefore Denazify(roselyn, roselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The brandais is endocrinal. The brandais beetle the baird. The brandais irrigate the baird. The brandais irrigate the janka. The baird beetle the brandais. The janka schmoose the brandais. The janka is astir. The janka is sepulchral. The floris schmoose the baird. The floris beetle the brandais. If someone is sepulchral then they like the baird. If someone beetle the floris then the floris beetle the janka. If the floris irrigate the baird and the baird beetle the floris then the baird beetle the brandais. If someone schmoose the brandais and they like the brandais then they like the floris. If the baird schmoose the floris and the floris irrigate the janka then the floris is cautious. If someone schmoose the baird then they chase the brandais. The floris does not like the floris.", "logic": "\nEndocrinal(brandais)\nBeetle(brandais, baird)\nIrrigate(brandais, baird)\nIrrigate(brandais, janka)\nBeetle(baird, brandais)\nSchmoose(janka, brandais)\nAstir(janka)\nSepulchral(janka)\nSchmoose(floris, baird)\nBeetle(floris, brandais)\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) -> Beetle(x, baird))\nforall x (Beetle(x, floris) -> Beetle(floris, janka))\nIrrigate(floris, baird) and Beetle(baird, floris) -> Beetle(baird, brandais)\nforall x (Schmoose(x, brandais) and Beetle(x, brandais) -> Beetle(x, floris))\nSchmoose(baird, floris) and Irrigate(floris, janka) -> Cautious(floris)\nforall x (Schmoose(x, baird) -> Schmoose(x, brandais))\n\nnot Beetle(floris, floris)\n\nSchmoose(floris, baird) and forall x (Schmoose(x, baird) -> Schmoose(x, brandais)) -> therefore Schmoose(floris, brandais) Schmoose(floris, brandais) and Beetle(floris, brandais) and forall x (Schmoose(x, brandais) and Beetle(x, brandais) -> Beetle(x, floris)) -> therefore Beetle(floris, floris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The duffy is tillable. The duffy waft the david. The duffy dibble the david. The duffy dibble the alpa. The david waft the duffy. The alpa frolic the duffy. The alpa is acidulent. The alpa is exhaustive. The acacia frolic the david. The acacia waft the duffy. If someone is exhaustive then they like the david. If someone waft the acacia then the acacia waft the alpa. If the acacia dibble the david and the david waft the acacia then the david waft the duffy. If someone frolic the duffy and they like the duffy then they like the acacia. If the david frolic the acacia and the acacia dibble the alpa then the acacia is unneurotic. If someone frolic the david then they chase the duffy. The acacia waft the alpa.", "logic": "\nTillable(duffy)\nWaft(duffy, david)\nDibble(duffy, david)\nDibble(duffy, alpa)\nWaft(david, duffy)\nFrolic(alpa, duffy)\nAcidulent(alpa)\nExhaustive(alpa)\nFrolic(acacia, david)\nWaft(acacia, duffy)\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Waft(x, david))\nforall x (Waft(x, acacia) -> Waft(acacia, alpa))\nDibble(acacia, david) and Waft(david, acacia) -> Waft(david, duffy)\nforall x (Frolic(x, duffy) and Waft(x, duffy) -> Waft(x, acacia))\nFrolic(david, acacia) and Dibble(acacia, alpa) -> Unneurotic(acacia)\nforall x (Frolic(x, david) -> Frolic(x, duffy))\n\nWaft(acacia, alpa)\n\nFrolic(acacia, david) and forall x (Frolic(x, david) -> Frolic(x, duffy)) -> therefore Frolic(acacia, duffy) Frolic(acacia, duffy) and Waft(acacia, duffy) and forall x (Frolic(x, duffy) and Waft(x, duffy) -> Waft(x, acacia)) -> therefore Waft(acacia, acacia) Waft(acacia, acacia) and forall x (Waft(x, acacia) -> Waft(acacia, alpa)) -> therefore Waft(acacia, alpa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The ealasaid is apodal. The ealasaid time the mischa. The ealasaid randomise the mischa. The ealasaid randomise the theodosia. The mischa time the ealasaid. The theodosia thoriate the ealasaid. The theodosia is smarmy. The theodosia is wound. The keslie thoriate the mischa. The keslie time the ealasaid. If someone is wound then they like the mischa. If someone time the keslie then the keslie time the theodosia. If the keslie randomise the mischa and the mischa time the keslie then the mischa time the ealasaid. If someone thoriate the ealasaid and they like the ealasaid then they like the keslie. If the mischa thoriate the keslie and the keslie randomise the theodosia then the keslie is moravian. If someone thoriate the mischa then they chase the ealasaid. The keslie does not like the theodosia.", "logic": "\nApodal(ealasaid)\nTime(ealasaid, mischa)\nRandomise(ealasaid, mischa)\nRandomise(ealasaid, theodosia)\nTime(mischa, ealasaid)\nThoriate(theodosia, ealasaid)\nSmarmy(theodosia)\nWound(theodosia)\nThoriate(keslie, mischa)\nTime(keslie, ealasaid)\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Time(x, mischa))\nforall x (Time(x, keslie) -> Time(keslie, theodosia))\nRandomise(keslie, mischa) and Time(mischa, keslie) -> Time(mischa, ealasaid)\nforall x (Thoriate(x, ealasaid) and Time(x, ealasaid) -> Time(x, keslie))\nThoriate(mischa, keslie) and Randomise(keslie, theodosia) -> Moravian(keslie)\nforall x (Thoriate(x, mischa) -> Thoriate(x, ealasaid))\n\nnot Time(keslie, theodosia)\n\nThoriate(keslie, mischa) and forall x (Thoriate(x, mischa) -> Thoriate(x, ealasaid)) -> therefore Thoriate(keslie, ealasaid) Thoriate(keslie, ealasaid) and Time(keslie, ealasaid) and forall x (Thoriate(x, ealasaid) and Time(x, ealasaid) -> Time(x, keslie)) -> therefore Time(keslie, keslie) Time(keslie, keslie) and forall x (Time(x, keslie) -> Time(keslie, theodosia)) -> therefore Time(keslie, theodosia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The carolyn is starkers. The carolyn reopen the karalee. The carolyn disoblige the karalee. The carolyn disoblige the lemuel. The karalee reopen the carolyn. The lemuel climb the carolyn. The lemuel is disunited. The lemuel is stubby. The giovanni climb the karalee. The giovanni reopen the carolyn. If someone is stubby then they like the karalee. If someone reopen the giovanni then the giovanni reopen the lemuel. If the giovanni disoblige the karalee and the karalee reopen the giovanni then the karalee reopen the carolyn. If someone climb the carolyn and they like the carolyn then they like the giovanni. If the karalee climb the giovanni and the giovanni disoblige the lemuel then the giovanni is worth. If someone climb the karalee then they chase the carolyn. The giovanni is not worth.", "logic": "\nStarkers(carolyn)\nReopen(carolyn, karalee)\nDisoblige(carolyn, karalee)\nDisoblige(carolyn, lemuel)\nReopen(karalee, carolyn)\nClimb(lemuel, carolyn)\nDisunited(lemuel)\nStubby(lemuel)\nClimb(giovanni, karalee)\nReopen(giovanni, carolyn)\nforall x (Stubby(x) -> Reopen(x, karalee))\nforall x (Reopen(x, giovanni) -> Reopen(giovanni, lemuel))\nDisoblige(giovanni, karalee) and Reopen(karalee, giovanni) -> Reopen(karalee, carolyn)\nforall x (Climb(x, carolyn) and Reopen(x, carolyn) -> Reopen(x, giovanni))\nClimb(karalee, giovanni) and Disoblige(giovanni, lemuel) -> Worth(giovanni)\nforall x (Climb(x, karalee) -> Climb(x, carolyn))\n\nnot Worth(giovanni)\n\nClimb(karalee, giovanni) and Disoblige(giovanni, lemuel) -> Worth(giovanni) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The beatrix is pedal. The beatrix instill the lauraine. The beatrix wiretap the lauraine. The beatrix wiretap the ritch. The lauraine instill the beatrix. The ritch tattoo the beatrix. The ritch is branchial. The ritch is shoreward. The corky tattoo the lauraine. The corky instill the beatrix. If someone is shoreward then they like the lauraine. If someone instill the corky then the corky instill the ritch. If the corky wiretap the lauraine and the lauraine instill the corky then the lauraine instill the beatrix. If someone tattoo the beatrix and they like the beatrix then they like the corky. If the lauraine tattoo the corky and the corky wiretap the ritch then the corky is comical. If someone tattoo the lauraine then they chase the beatrix. The beatrix instill the corky.", "logic": "\nPedal(beatrix)\nInstill(beatrix, lauraine)\nWiretap(beatrix, lauraine)\nWiretap(beatrix, ritch)\nInstill(lauraine, beatrix)\nTattoo(ritch, beatrix)\nBranchial(ritch)\nShoreward(ritch)\nTattoo(corky, lauraine)\nInstill(corky, beatrix)\nforall x (Shoreward(x) -> Instill(x, lauraine))\nforall x (Instill(x, corky) -> Instill(corky, ritch))\nWiretap(corky, lauraine) and Instill(lauraine, corky) -> Instill(lauraine, beatrix)\nforall x (Tattoo(x, beatrix) and Instill(x, beatrix) -> Instill(x, corky))\nTattoo(lauraine, corky) and Wiretap(corky, ritch) -> Comical(corky)\nforall x (Tattoo(x, lauraine) -> Tattoo(x, beatrix))\n\nInstill(beatrix, corky)\n\nforall x (Tattoo(x, beatrix) and Instill(x, beatrix) -> Instill(x, corky)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The kingston is ridged. The kingston underpin the teressa. The kingston service the teressa. The kingston service the octavia. The teressa underpin the kingston. The octavia mousse the kingston. The octavia is under. The octavia is wandering. The cora mousse the teressa. The cora underpin the kingston. If someone is wandering then they like the teressa. If someone underpin the cora then the cora underpin the octavia. If the cora service the teressa and the teressa underpin the cora then the teressa underpin the kingston. If someone mousse the kingston and they like the kingston then they like the cora. If the teressa mousse the cora and the cora service the octavia then the cora is rustless. If someone mousse the teressa then they chase the kingston. The teressa does not chase the kingston.", "logic": "\nRidged(kingston)\nUnderpin(kingston, teressa)\nService(kingston, teressa)\nService(kingston, octavia)\nUnderpin(teressa, kingston)\nMousse(octavia, kingston)\nUnder(octavia)\nWandering(octavia)\nMousse(cora, teressa)\nUnderpin(cora, kingston)\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> Underpin(x, teressa))\nforall x (Underpin(x, cora) -> Underpin(cora, octavia))\nService(cora, teressa) and Underpin(teressa, cora) -> Underpin(teressa, kingston)\nforall x (Mousse(x, kingston) and Underpin(x, kingston) -> Underpin(x, cora))\nMousse(teressa, cora) and Service(cora, octavia) -> Rustless(cora)\nforall x (Mousse(x, teressa) -> Mousse(x, kingston))\n\nnot Mousse(teressa, kingston)\n\nforall x (Mousse(x, teressa) -> Mousse(x, kingston)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The lorita is quaternate. The lorita faggot the leonore. The lorita rede the leonore. The lorita rede the audie. The leonore faggot the lorita. The audie snoop the lorita. The audie is dressed. The audie is maoist. The rebbecca snoop the leonore. The rebbecca faggot the lorita. If someone is maoist then they like the leonore. If someone faggot the rebbecca then the rebbecca faggot the audie. If the rebbecca rede the leonore and the leonore faggot the rebbecca then the leonore faggot the lorita. If someone snoop the lorita and they like the lorita then they like the rebbecca. If the leonore snoop the rebbecca and the rebbecca rede the audie then the rebbecca is mutative. If someone snoop the leonore then they chase the lorita. The leonore faggot the rebbecca.", "logic": "\nQuaternate(lorita)\nFaggot(lorita, leonore)\nRede(lorita, leonore)\nRede(lorita, audie)\nFaggot(leonore, lorita)\nSnoop(audie, lorita)\nDressed(audie)\nMaoist(audie)\nSnoop(rebbecca, leonore)\nFaggot(rebbecca, lorita)\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> Faggot(x, leonore))\nforall x (Faggot(x, rebbecca) -> Faggot(rebbecca, audie))\nRede(rebbecca, leonore) and Faggot(leonore, rebbecca) -> Faggot(leonore, lorita)\nforall x (Snoop(x, lorita) and Faggot(x, lorita) -> Faggot(x, rebbecca))\nSnoop(leonore, rebbecca) and Rede(rebbecca, audie) -> Mutative(rebbecca)\nforall x (Snoop(x, leonore) -> Snoop(x, lorita))\n\nFaggot(leonore, rebbecca)\n\nforall x (Snoop(x, lorita) and Faggot(x, lorita) -> Faggot(x, rebbecca)) <- forall x (Snoop(x, leonore) -> Snoop(x, lorita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The helaine is dickey. The helaine latinize the marcille. The helaine sparge the marcille. The helaine sparge the elianore. The marcille latinize the helaine. The elianore package the helaine. The elianore is synaptic. The elianore is civilized. The evette package the marcille. The evette latinize the helaine. If someone is civilized then they like the marcille. If someone latinize the evette then the evette latinize the elianore. If the evette sparge the marcille and the marcille latinize the evette then the marcille latinize the helaine. If someone package the helaine and they like the helaine then they like the evette. If the marcille package the evette and the evette sparge the elianore then the evette is viable. If someone package the marcille then they chase the helaine. The marcille does not see the helaine.", "logic": "\nDickey(helaine)\nLatinize(helaine, marcille)\nSparge(helaine, marcille)\nSparge(helaine, elianore)\nLatinize(marcille, helaine)\nPackage(elianore, helaine)\nSynaptic(elianore)\nCivilized(elianore)\nPackage(evette, marcille)\nLatinize(evette, helaine)\nforall x (Civilized(x) -> Latinize(x, marcille))\nforall x (Latinize(x, evette) -> Latinize(evette, elianore))\nSparge(evette, marcille) and Latinize(marcille, evette) -> Latinize(marcille, helaine)\nforall x (Package(x, helaine) and Latinize(x, helaine) -> Latinize(x, evette))\nPackage(marcille, evette) and Sparge(evette, elianore) -> Viable(evette)\nforall x (Package(x, marcille) -> Package(x, helaine))\n\nnot Sparge(marcille, helaine)\n\nnot Sparge(marcille, helaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The ursula is thirtieth. The ursula flop the stinky. The ursula acidulate the stinky. The ursula acidulate the matthiew. The stinky flop the ursula. The matthiew bellyache the ursula. The matthiew is mated. The matthiew is faced. The revkah bellyache the stinky. The revkah flop the ursula. If someone is faced then they like the stinky. If someone flop the revkah then the revkah flop the matthiew. If the revkah acidulate the stinky and the stinky flop the revkah then the stinky flop the ursula. If someone bellyache the ursula and they like the ursula then they like the revkah. If the stinky bellyache the revkah and the revkah acidulate the matthiew then the revkah is tusked. If someone bellyache the stinky then they chase the ursula. The revkah is mated.", "logic": "\nThirtieth(ursula)\nFlop(ursula, stinky)\nAcidulate(ursula, stinky)\nAcidulate(ursula, matthiew)\nFlop(stinky, ursula)\nBellyache(matthiew, ursula)\nMated(matthiew)\nFaced(matthiew)\nBellyache(revkah, stinky)\nFlop(revkah, ursula)\nforall x (Faced(x) -> Flop(x, stinky))\nforall x (Flop(x, revkah) -> Flop(revkah, matthiew))\nAcidulate(revkah, stinky) and Flop(stinky, revkah) -> Flop(stinky, ursula)\nforall x (Bellyache(x, ursula) and Flop(x, ursula) -> Flop(x, revkah))\nBellyache(stinky, revkah) and Acidulate(revkah, matthiew) -> Tusked(revkah)\nforall x (Bellyache(x, stinky) -> Bellyache(x, ursula))\n\nMated(revkah)\n\nMated(revkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The loise is guinean. The loise unclog the melisande. The loise tout the melisande. The loise tout the binni. The melisande unclog the loise. The binni curry the loise. The binni is nominated. The binni is languorous. The berthe curry the melisande. The berthe unclog the loise. If someone is languorous then they like the melisande. If someone unclog the berthe then the berthe unclog the binni. If the berthe tout the melisande and the melisande unclog the berthe then the melisande unclog the loise. If someone curry the loise and they like the loise then they like the berthe. If the melisande curry the berthe and the berthe tout the binni then the berthe is unhappy. If someone curry the melisande then they chase the loise. The loise is not unhappy.", "logic": "\nGuinean(loise)\nUnclog(loise, melisande)\nTout(loise, melisande)\nTout(loise, binni)\nUnclog(melisande, loise)\nCurry(binni, loise)\nNominated(binni)\nLanguorous(binni)\nCurry(berthe, melisande)\nUnclog(berthe, loise)\nforall x (Languorous(x) -> Unclog(x, melisande))\nforall x (Unclog(x, berthe) -> Unclog(berthe, binni))\nTout(berthe, melisande) and Unclog(melisande, berthe) -> Unclog(melisande, loise)\nforall x (Curry(x, loise) and Unclog(x, loise) -> Unclog(x, berthe))\nCurry(melisande, berthe) and Tout(berthe, binni) -> Unhappy(berthe)\nforall x (Curry(x, melisande) -> Curry(x, loise))\n\nnot Unhappy(loise)\n\nnot Unhappy(loise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The gwendolyn is unrevealed. The gwendolyn repent the roxanna. The gwendolyn prostitute the roxanna. The gwendolyn prostitute the karna. The roxanna repent the gwendolyn. The karna zinc the gwendolyn. The karna is umptieth. The karna is pumped. The pedro zinc the roxanna. The pedro repent the gwendolyn. If someone is pumped then they like the roxanna. If someone repent the pedro then the pedro repent the karna. If the pedro prostitute the roxanna and the roxanna repent the pedro then the roxanna repent the gwendolyn. If someone zinc the gwendolyn and they like the gwendolyn then they like the pedro. If the roxanna zinc the pedro and the pedro prostitute the karna then the pedro is eyeless. If someone zinc the roxanna then they chase the gwendolyn. The pedro prostitute the karna.", "logic": "\nUnrevealed(gwendolyn)\nRepent(gwendolyn, roxanna)\nProstitute(gwendolyn, roxanna)\nProstitute(gwendolyn, karna)\nRepent(roxanna, gwendolyn)\nZinc(karna, gwendolyn)\nUmptieth(karna)\nPumped(karna)\nZinc(pedro, roxanna)\nRepent(pedro, gwendolyn)\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> Repent(x, roxanna))\nforall x (Repent(x, pedro) -> Repent(pedro, karna))\nProstitute(pedro, roxanna) and Repent(roxanna, pedro) -> Repent(roxanna, gwendolyn)\nforall x (Zinc(x, gwendolyn) and Repent(x, gwendolyn) -> Repent(x, pedro))\nZinc(roxanna, pedro) and Prostitute(pedro, karna) -> Eyeless(pedro)\nforall x (Zinc(x, roxanna) -> Zinc(x, gwendolyn))\n\nProstitute(pedro, karna)\n\nProstitute(pedro, karna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Nanni is untracked. Dede is seriocomic. Fanni is sacral. If something is apothecial and tall then it is sacral. Smart things are apothecial. If something is tall then it is heedless. Blue things are untracked. If Fanni is sacral then Fanni is tall. All seriocomic things are heedless. Fanni is sacral.", "logic": "\nUntracked(nanni)\nSeriocomic(dede)\nSacral(fanni)\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Tall(x) -> Sacral(x))\nforall x (Heedless(x) -> Apothecial(x))\nforall x (Tall(x) -> Heedless(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) -> Untracked(x))\nSacral(fanni) -> Tall(fanni)\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) -> Heedless(x))\n\nSacral(fanni)\n\ntherefore Sacral(fanni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Zechariah is subdued. Gilda is solvent. Tamiko is unsent. If something is veinal and favourite then it is unsent. Smart things are veinal. If something is favourite then it is weepy. Blue things are subdued. If Tamiko is unsent then Tamiko is favourite. All solvent things are weepy. Zechariah is not subdued.", "logic": "\nSubdued(zechariah)\nSolvent(gilda)\nUnsent(tamiko)\nforall x (Veinal(x) and Favourite(x) -> Unsent(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Veinal(x))\nforall x (Favourite(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Solvent(x) -> Subdued(x))\nUnsent(tamiko) -> Favourite(tamiko)\nforall x (Solvent(x) -> Weepy(x))\n\nnot Subdued(zechariah)\n\ntherefore Subdued(zechariah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Nickey is cymose. Trudey is metonymic. Aldric is dreamlike. If something is feckless and meritless then it is dreamlike. Smart things are feckless. If something is meritless then it is uncharted. Blue things are cymose. If Aldric is dreamlike then Aldric is meritless. All metonymic things are uncharted. Aldric is meritless.", "logic": "\nCymose(nickey)\nMetonymic(trudey)\nDreamlike(aldric)\nforall x (Feckless(x) and Meritless(x) -> Dreamlike(x))\nforall x (Uncharted(x) -> Feckless(x))\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Uncharted(x))\nforall x (Metonymic(x) -> Cymose(x))\nDreamlike(aldric) -> Meritless(aldric)\nforall x (Metonymic(x) -> Uncharted(x))\n\nMeritless(aldric)\n\nDreamlike(aldric) and Dreamlike(aldric) -> Meritless(aldric) -> therefore Meritless(aldric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Jody is grey. Andrzej is viable. Lula is mothproof. If something is fleshly and sunk then it is mothproof. Smart things are fleshly. If something is sunk then it is bronze. Blue things are grey. If Lula is mothproof then Lula is sunk. All viable things are bronze. Andrzej is not grey.", "logic": "\nGrey(jody)\nViable(andrzej)\nMothproof(lula)\nforall x (Fleshly(x) and Sunk(x) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Bronze(x) -> Fleshly(x))\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Bronze(x))\nforall x (Viable(x) -> Grey(x))\nMothproof(lula) -> Sunk(lula)\nforall x (Viable(x) -> Bronze(x))\n\nnot Grey(andrzej)\n\nViable(andrzej) and forall x (Viable(x) -> Grey(x)) -> therefore Grey(andrzej)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Jennica is inbound. Joyan is indelicate. Roxana is horned. If something is caustic and unarguable then it is horned. Smart things are caustic. If something is unarguable then it is associate. Blue things are inbound. If Roxana is horned then Roxana is unarguable. All indelicate things are associate. Roxana is associate.", "logic": "\nInbound(jennica)\nIndelicate(joyan)\nHorned(roxana)\nforall x (Caustic(x) and Unarguable(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Associate(x) -> Caustic(x))\nforall x (Unarguable(x) -> Associate(x))\nforall x (Indelicate(x) -> Inbound(x))\nHorned(roxana) -> Unarguable(roxana)\nforall x (Indelicate(x) -> Associate(x))\n\nAssociate(roxana)\n\nHorned(roxana) and Horned(roxana) -> Unarguable(roxana) -> therefore Unarguable(roxana) Unarguable(roxana) and forall x (Unarguable(x) -> Associate(x)) -> therefore Associate(roxana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Lewis is katabolic. Marlyn is cancelled. Wallie is reanimated. If something is sallow and sophomore then it is reanimated. Smart things are sallow. If something is sophomore then it is acinic. Blue things are katabolic. If Wallie is reanimated then Wallie is sophomore. All cancelled things are acinic. Wallie is not acinic.", "logic": "\nKatabolic(lewis)\nCancelled(marlyn)\nReanimated(wallie)\nforall x (Sallow(x) and Sophomore(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Acinic(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Sophomore(x) -> Acinic(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) -> Katabolic(x))\nReanimated(wallie) -> Sophomore(wallie)\nforall x (Cancelled(x) -> Acinic(x))\n\nnot Acinic(wallie)\n\nReanimated(wallie) and Reanimated(wallie) -> Sophomore(wallie) -> therefore Sophomore(wallie) Sophomore(wallie) and forall x (Sophomore(x) -> Acinic(x)) -> therefore Acinic(wallie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Flossie is unmelted. Alvina is sozzled. Gavrielle is trivalent. If something is appositive and churlish then it is trivalent. Smart things are appositive. If something is churlish then it is ungeared. Blue things are unmelted. If Gavrielle is trivalent then Gavrielle is churlish. All sozzled things are ungeared. Gavrielle is appositive.", "logic": "\nUnmelted(flossie)\nSozzled(alvina)\nTrivalent(gavrielle)\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Churlish(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nforall x (Ungeared(x) -> Appositive(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> Ungeared(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nTrivalent(gavrielle) -> Churlish(gavrielle)\nforall x (Sozzled(x) -> Ungeared(x))\n\nAppositive(gavrielle)\n\nTrivalent(gavrielle) and Trivalent(gavrielle) -> Churlish(gavrielle) -> therefore Churlish(gavrielle) Churlish(gavrielle) and forall x (Churlish(x) -> Ungeared(x)) -> therefore Ungeared(gavrielle) Ungeared(gavrielle) and forall x (Ungeared(x) -> Appositive(x)) -> therefore Appositive(gavrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Janice is hierarchic. Maury is adamantine. Hammad is orthoptic. If something is pretorian and parous then it is orthoptic. Smart things are pretorian. If something is parous then it is ungeared. Blue things are hierarchic. If Hammad is orthoptic then Hammad is parous. All adamantine things are ungeared. Hammad is not pretorian.", "logic": "\nHierarchic(janice)\nAdamantine(maury)\nOrthoptic(hammad)\nforall x (Pretorian(x) and Parous(x) -> Orthoptic(x))\nforall x (Ungeared(x) -> Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Parous(x) -> Ungeared(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\nOrthoptic(hammad) -> Parous(hammad)\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Ungeared(x))\n\nnot Pretorian(hammad)\n\nOrthoptic(hammad) and Orthoptic(hammad) -> Parous(hammad) -> therefore Parous(hammad) Parous(hammad) and forall x (Parous(x) -> Ungeared(x)) -> therefore Ungeared(hammad) Ungeared(hammad) and forall x (Ungeared(x) -> Pretorian(x)) -> therefore Pretorian(hammad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Adolfo is windward. Tommi is diadromous. Correy is titulary. If something is beakless and catoptric then it is titulary. Smart things are beakless. If something is catoptric then it is glinting. Blue things are windward. If Correy is titulary then Correy is catoptric. All diadromous things are glinting. Correy is not windward.", "logic": "\nWindward(adolfo)\nDiadromous(tommi)\nTitulary(correy)\nforall x (Beakless(x) and Catoptric(x) -> Titulary(x))\nforall x (Glinting(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Catoptric(x) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Windward(x))\nTitulary(correy) -> Catoptric(correy)\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Glinting(x))\n\nnot Windward(correy)\n\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Windward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Rudd is struggling. Tandi is ablaze. Hailee is stealthy. If something is mute and dislocated then it is stealthy. Smart things are mute. If something is dislocated then it is meet. Blue things are struggling. If Hailee is stealthy then Hailee is dislocated. All ablaze things are meet. Rudd is stealthy.", "logic": "\nStruggling(rudd)\nAblaze(tandi)\nStealthy(hailee)\nforall x (Mute(x) and Dislocated(x) -> Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Meet(x) -> Mute(x))\nforall x (Dislocated(x) -> Meet(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Struggling(x))\nStealthy(hailee) -> Dislocated(hailee)\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Meet(x))\n\nStealthy(rudd)\n\nforall x (Mute(x) and Dislocated(x) -> Stealthy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Valaree is antitank. Cherilynn is avirulent. Roderich is abnormal. If something is cantabile and reflecting then it is abnormal. Smart things are cantabile. If something is reflecting then it is arborary. Blue things are antitank. If Roderich is abnormal then Roderich is reflecting. All avirulent things are arborary. Valaree is not cantabile.", "logic": "\nAntitank(valaree)\nAvirulent(cherilynn)\nAbnormal(roderich)\nforall x (Cantabile(x) and Reflecting(x) -> Abnormal(x))\nforall x (Arborary(x) -> Cantabile(x))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Arborary(x))\nforall x (Avirulent(x) -> Antitank(x))\nAbnormal(roderich) -> Reflecting(roderich)\nforall x (Avirulent(x) -> Arborary(x))\n\nnot Cantabile(valaree)\n\nforall x (Arborary(x) -> Cantabile(x)) <- forall x (Reflecting(x) -> Arborary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Adella is milklike. Salmon is edited. Harv is patchy. If something is humid and slapdash then it is patchy. Smart things are humid. If something is slapdash then it is attenuate. Blue things are milklike. If Harv is patchy then Harv is slapdash. All edited things are attenuate. Salmon is patchy.", "logic": "\nMilklike(adella)\nEdited(salmon)\nPatchy(harv)\nforall x (Humid(x) and Slapdash(x) -> Patchy(x))\nforall x (Attenuate(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Slapdash(x) -> Attenuate(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Milklike(x))\nPatchy(harv) -> Slapdash(harv)\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Attenuate(x))\n\nPatchy(salmon)\n\nforall x (Humid(x) and Slapdash(x) -> Patchy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Bryna is english. Sanderson is metrical. Arlie is acetylenic. If something is perforated and spasmodic then it is acetylenic. Smart things are perforated. If something is spasmodic then it is midway. Blue things are english. If Arlie is acetylenic then Arlie is spasmodic. All metrical things are midway. Bryna is not white.", "logic": "\nEnglish(bryna)\nMetrical(sanderson)\nAcetylenic(arlie)\nforall x (Perforated(x) and Spasmodic(x) -> Acetylenic(x))\nforall x (Midway(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Spasmodic(x) -> Midway(x))\nforall x (Metrical(x) -> English(x))\nAcetylenic(arlie) -> Spasmodic(arlie)\nforall x (Metrical(x) -> Midway(x))\n\nnot White(bryna)\n\nnot White(bryna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Bela is mass. Linzy is mild. Eugenia is inferior. If something is swordlike and occupied then it is inferior. Smart things are swordlike. If something is occupied then it is pentagonal. Blue things are mass. If Eugenia is inferior then Eugenia is occupied. All mild things are pentagonal. Bela is mild.", "logic": "\nMass(bela)\nMild(linzy)\nInferior(eugenia)\nforall x (Swordlike(x) and Occupied(x) -> Inferior(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Swordlike(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Mild(x) -> Mass(x))\nInferior(eugenia) -> Occupied(eugenia)\nforall x (Mild(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\n\nMild(bela)\n\nMild(bela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Irena is social. Codie is rotational. Engelbert is eatable. If something is lupine and annoyed then it is eatable. Smart things are lupine. If something is annoyed then it is incendiary. Blue things are social. If Engelbert is eatable then Engelbert is annoyed. All rotational things are incendiary. Codie is not annoyed.", "logic": "\nSocial(irena)\nRotational(codie)\nEatable(engelbert)\nforall x (Lupine(x) and Annoyed(x) -> Eatable(x))\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Incendiary(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> Social(x))\nEatable(engelbert) -> Annoyed(engelbert)\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> Incendiary(x))\n\nnot Annoyed(codie)\n\nnot Annoyed(codie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Sioux is lofty. Ragnar is bacteremic. Nisse is umbilicate. If something is humourless and postmortal then it is umbilicate. Smart things are humourless. If something is postmortal then it is rheumatic. Blue things are lofty. If Nisse is umbilicate then Nisse is postmortal. All bacteremic things are rheumatic. Nisse is white.", "logic": "\nLofty(sioux)\nBacteremic(ragnar)\nUmbilicate(nisse)\nforall x (Humourless(x) and Postmortal(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\nforall x (Rheumatic(x) -> Humourless(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) -> Lofty(x))\nUmbilicate(nisse) -> Postmortal(nisse)\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\n\nWhite(nisse)\n\nWhite(nisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "The robinson adore the herrick. The robinson adore the terrill. The robinson twitter the herrick. The robinson is nippy. The herrick adore the robinson. The herrick is nippy. The herrick stag the robinson. The herrick stag the terrill. The herrick stag the ruby. The terrill adore the robinson. The terrill adore the ruby. The terrill is pierced. The terrill stag the robinson. The ruby adore the robinson. The ruby adore the terrill. The ruby is crabbed. If something twitter the robinson then the robinson adore the terrill. All amoebous things are pierced. If the ruby twitter the herrick then the herrick twitter the terrill. If something is pierced then it twitter the robinson. If something adore the herrick and it stag the terrill then the terrill is nippy. If something adore the robinson and it is nippy then it adore the herrick. If something stag the herrick then it is corneous. All pierced, crabbed things are corneous. The terrill adore the robinson.", "logic": "\nAdore(robinson, herrick)\nAdore(robinson, terrill)\nTwitter(robinson, herrick)\nNippy(robinson)\nAdore(herrick, robinson)\nNippy(herrick)\nStag(herrick, robinson)\nStag(herrick, terrill)\nStag(herrick, ruby)\nAdore(terrill, robinson)\nAdore(terrill, ruby)\nPierced(terrill)\nStag(terrill, robinson)\nAdore(ruby, robinson)\nAdore(ruby, terrill)\nCrabbed(ruby)\nforall x (Twitter(x, robinson) -> Adore(robinson, terrill))\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Pierced(x))\nTwitter(ruby, herrick) -> Twitter(herrick, terrill)\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Twitter(x, robinson))\nforall x (Adore(x, herrick) and Stag(x, terrill) -> Nippy(terrill))\nforall x (Adore(x, robinson) and Nippy(x) -> Adore(x, herrick))\nforall x (Stag(x, herrick) -> Corneous(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) and Crabbed(x) -> Corneous(x))\n\nAdore(terrill, robinson)\n\ntherefore Adore(terrill, robinson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The beatrisa disqualify the aryn. The beatrisa disqualify the osmond. The beatrisa crouch the aryn. The beatrisa is ashy. The aryn disqualify the beatrisa. The aryn is ashy. The aryn revise the beatrisa. The aryn revise the osmond. The aryn revise the lisette. The osmond disqualify the beatrisa. The osmond disqualify the lisette. The osmond is veined. The osmond revise the beatrisa. The lisette disqualify the beatrisa. The lisette disqualify the osmond. The lisette is much. If something crouch the beatrisa then the beatrisa disqualify the osmond. All numinous things are veined. If the lisette crouch the aryn then the aryn crouch the osmond. If something is veined then it crouch the beatrisa. If something disqualify the aryn and it revise the osmond then the osmond is ashy. If something disqualify the beatrisa and it is ashy then it disqualify the aryn. If something revise the aryn then it is awing. All veined, much things are awing. The aryn does not like the beatrisa.", "logic": "\nDisqualify(beatrisa, aryn)\nDisqualify(beatrisa, osmond)\nCrouch(beatrisa, aryn)\nAshy(beatrisa)\nDisqualify(aryn, beatrisa)\nAshy(aryn)\nRevise(aryn, beatrisa)\nRevise(aryn, osmond)\nRevise(aryn, lisette)\nDisqualify(osmond, beatrisa)\nDisqualify(osmond, lisette)\nVeined(osmond)\nRevise(osmond, beatrisa)\nDisqualify(lisette, beatrisa)\nDisqualify(lisette, osmond)\nMuch(lisette)\nforall x (Crouch(x, beatrisa) -> Disqualify(beatrisa, osmond))\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> Veined(x))\nCrouch(lisette, aryn) -> Crouch(aryn, osmond)\nforall x (Veined(x) -> Crouch(x, beatrisa))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, aryn) and Revise(x, osmond) -> Ashy(osmond))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, beatrisa) and Ashy(x) -> Disqualify(x, aryn))\nforall x (Revise(x, aryn) -> Awing(x))\nforall x (Veined(x) and Much(x) -> Awing(x))\n\nnot Revise(aryn, beatrisa)\n\ntherefore Revise(aryn, beatrisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The grant airt the hallie. The grant airt the garnet. The grant discomfit the hallie. The grant is boundless. The hallie airt the grant. The hallie is boundless. The hallie disinfect the grant. The hallie disinfect the garnet. The hallie disinfect the drake. The garnet airt the grant. The garnet airt the drake. The garnet is unthought. The garnet disinfect the grant. The drake airt the grant. The drake airt the garnet. The drake is untagged. If something discomfit the grant then the grant airt the garnet. All goethean things are unthought. If the drake discomfit the hallie then the hallie discomfit the garnet. If something is unthought then it discomfit the grant. If something airt the hallie and it disinfect the garnet then the garnet is boundless. If something airt the grant and it is boundless then it airt the hallie. If something disinfect the hallie then it is lasting. All unthought, untagged things are lasting. The hallie airt the hallie.", "logic": "\nAirt(grant, hallie)\nAirt(grant, garnet)\nDiscomfit(grant, hallie)\nBoundless(grant)\nAirt(hallie, grant)\nBoundless(hallie)\nDisinfect(hallie, grant)\nDisinfect(hallie, garnet)\nDisinfect(hallie, drake)\nAirt(garnet, grant)\nAirt(garnet, drake)\nUnthought(garnet)\nDisinfect(garnet, grant)\nAirt(drake, grant)\nAirt(drake, garnet)\nUntagged(drake)\nforall x (Discomfit(x, grant) -> Airt(grant, garnet))\nforall x (Goethean(x) -> Unthought(x))\nDiscomfit(drake, hallie) -> Discomfit(hallie, garnet)\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Discomfit(x, grant))\nforall x (Airt(x, hallie) and Disinfect(x, garnet) -> Boundless(garnet))\nforall x (Airt(x, grant) and Boundless(x) -> Airt(x, hallie))\nforall x (Disinfect(x, hallie) -> Lasting(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) and Untagged(x) -> Lasting(x))\n\nAirt(hallie, hallie)\n\nAirt(hallie, grant) and Boundless(hallie) and forall x (Airt(x, grant) and Boundless(x) -> Airt(x, hallie)) -> therefore Airt(hallie, hallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The olympie lucubrate the britaney. The olympie lucubrate the filip. The olympie obsess the britaney. The olympie is relocated. The britaney lucubrate the olympie. The britaney is relocated. The britaney vulgarise the olympie. The britaney vulgarise the filip. The britaney vulgarise the magna. The filip lucubrate the olympie. The filip lucubrate the magna. The filip is abusive. The filip vulgarise the olympie. The magna lucubrate the olympie. The magna lucubrate the filip. The magna is generic. If something obsess the olympie then the olympie lucubrate the filip. All ironshod things are abusive. If the magna obsess the britaney then the britaney obsess the filip. If something is abusive then it obsess the olympie. If something lucubrate the britaney and it vulgarise the filip then the filip is relocated. If something lucubrate the olympie and it is relocated then it lucubrate the britaney. If something vulgarise the britaney then it is grayish. All abusive, generic things are grayish. The britaney does not chase the britaney.", "logic": "\nLucubrate(olympie, britaney)\nLucubrate(olympie, filip)\nObsess(olympie, britaney)\nRelocated(olympie)\nLucubrate(britaney, olympie)\nRelocated(britaney)\nVulgarise(britaney, olympie)\nVulgarise(britaney, filip)\nVulgarise(britaney, magna)\nLucubrate(filip, olympie)\nLucubrate(filip, magna)\nAbusive(filip)\nVulgarise(filip, olympie)\nLucubrate(magna, olympie)\nLucubrate(magna, filip)\nGeneric(magna)\nforall x (Obsess(x, olympie) -> Lucubrate(olympie, filip))\nforall x (Ironshod(x) -> Abusive(x))\nObsess(magna, britaney) -> Obsess(britaney, filip)\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Obsess(x, olympie))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, britaney) and Vulgarise(x, filip) -> Relocated(filip))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, olympie) and Relocated(x) -> Lucubrate(x, britaney))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, britaney) -> Grayish(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) and Generic(x) -> Grayish(x))\n\nnot Lucubrate(britaney, britaney)\n\nLucubrate(britaney, olympie) and Relocated(britaney) and forall x (Lucubrate(x, olympie) and Relocated(x) -> Lucubrate(x, britaney)) -> therefore Lucubrate(britaney, britaney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The ailey saccharify the roobbie. The ailey saccharify the aram. The ailey supercede the roobbie. The ailey is egregious. The roobbie saccharify the ailey. The roobbie is egregious. The roobbie table the ailey. The roobbie table the aram. The roobbie table the merrill. The aram saccharify the ailey. The aram saccharify the merrill. The aram is syncopated. The aram table the ailey. The merrill saccharify the ailey. The merrill saccharify the aram. The merrill is unbordered. If something supercede the ailey then the ailey saccharify the aram. All fortified things are syncopated. If the merrill supercede the roobbie then the roobbie supercede the aram. If something is syncopated then it supercede the ailey. If something saccharify the roobbie and it table the aram then the aram is egregious. If something saccharify the ailey and it is egregious then it saccharify the roobbie. If something table the roobbie then it is moldovan. All syncopated, unbordered things are moldovan. The aram is egregious.", "logic": "\nSaccharify(ailey, roobbie)\nSaccharify(ailey, aram)\nSupercede(ailey, roobbie)\nEgregious(ailey)\nSaccharify(roobbie, ailey)\nEgregious(roobbie)\nTable(roobbie, ailey)\nTable(roobbie, aram)\nTable(roobbie, merrill)\nSaccharify(aram, ailey)\nSaccharify(aram, merrill)\nSyncopated(aram)\nTable(aram, ailey)\nSaccharify(merrill, ailey)\nSaccharify(merrill, aram)\nUnbordered(merrill)\nforall x (Supercede(x, ailey) -> Saccharify(ailey, aram))\nforall x (Fortified(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nSupercede(merrill, roobbie) -> Supercede(roobbie, aram)\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Supercede(x, ailey))\nforall x (Saccharify(x, roobbie) and Table(x, aram) -> Egregious(aram))\nforall x (Saccharify(x, ailey) and Egregious(x) -> Saccharify(x, roobbie))\nforall x (Table(x, roobbie) -> Moldovan(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) and Unbordered(x) -> Moldovan(x))\n\nEgregious(aram)\n\nSaccharify(roobbie, ailey) and Egregious(roobbie) and forall x (Saccharify(x, ailey) and Egregious(x) -> Saccharify(x, roobbie)) -> therefore Saccharify(roobbie, roobbie) Saccharify(roobbie, roobbie) and Table(roobbie, aram) and forall x (Saccharify(x, roobbie) and Table(x, aram) -> Egregious(aram)) -> therefore Egregious(aram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The anstice mechanize the iris. The anstice mechanize the lorne. The anstice linearize the iris. The anstice is jamesian. The iris mechanize the anstice. The iris is jamesian. The iris oversee the anstice. The iris oversee the lorne. The iris oversee the dacie. The lorne mechanize the anstice. The lorne mechanize the dacie. The lorne is flawed. The lorne oversee the anstice. The dacie mechanize the anstice. The dacie mechanize the lorne. The dacie is coarsened. If something linearize the anstice then the anstice mechanize the lorne. All potbellied things are flawed. If the dacie linearize the iris then the iris linearize the lorne. If something is flawed then it linearize the anstice. If something mechanize the iris and it oversee the lorne then the lorne is jamesian. If something mechanize the anstice and it is jamesian then it mechanize the iris. If something oversee the iris then it is sage. All flawed, coarsened things are sage. The lorne is not jamesian.", "logic": "\nMechanize(anstice, iris)\nMechanize(anstice, lorne)\nLinearize(anstice, iris)\nJamesian(anstice)\nMechanize(iris, anstice)\nJamesian(iris)\nOversee(iris, anstice)\nOversee(iris, lorne)\nOversee(iris, dacie)\nMechanize(lorne, anstice)\nMechanize(lorne, dacie)\nFlawed(lorne)\nOversee(lorne, anstice)\nMechanize(dacie, anstice)\nMechanize(dacie, lorne)\nCoarsened(dacie)\nforall x (Linearize(x, anstice) -> Mechanize(anstice, lorne))\nforall x (Potbellied(x) -> Flawed(x))\nLinearize(dacie, iris) -> Linearize(iris, lorne)\nforall x (Flawed(x) -> Linearize(x, anstice))\nforall x (Mechanize(x, iris) and Oversee(x, lorne) -> Jamesian(lorne))\nforall x (Mechanize(x, anstice) and Jamesian(x) -> Mechanize(x, iris))\nforall x (Oversee(x, iris) -> Sage(x))\nforall x (Flawed(x) and Coarsened(x) -> Sage(x))\n\nnot Jamesian(lorne)\n\nMechanize(iris, anstice) and Jamesian(iris) and forall x (Mechanize(x, anstice) and Jamesian(x) -> Mechanize(x, iris)) -> therefore Mechanize(iris, iris) Mechanize(iris, iris) and Oversee(iris, lorne) and forall x (Mechanize(x, iris) and Oversee(x, lorne) -> Jamesian(lorne)) -> therefore Jamesian(lorne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The cybel flatter the sid. The cybel flatter the lorianne. The cybel detach the sid. The cybel is functional. The sid flatter the cybel. The sid is functional. The sid copper the cybel. The sid copper the lorianne. The sid copper the maxfield. The lorianne flatter the cybel. The lorianne flatter the maxfield. The lorianne is umbrageous. The lorianne copper the cybel. The maxfield flatter the cybel. The maxfield flatter the lorianne. The maxfield is dazzled. If something detach the cybel then the cybel flatter the lorianne. All thorny things are umbrageous. If the maxfield detach the sid then the sid detach the lorianne. If something is umbrageous then it detach the cybel. If something flatter the sid and it copper the lorianne then the lorianne is functional. If something flatter the cybel and it is functional then it flatter the sid. If something copper the sid then it is redoubled. All umbrageous, dazzled things are redoubled. The lorianne flatter the sid.", "logic": "\nFlatter(cybel, sid)\nFlatter(cybel, lorianne)\nDetach(cybel, sid)\nFunctional(cybel)\nFlatter(sid, cybel)\nFunctional(sid)\nCopper(sid, cybel)\nCopper(sid, lorianne)\nCopper(sid, maxfield)\nFlatter(lorianne, cybel)\nFlatter(lorianne, maxfield)\nUmbrageous(lorianne)\nCopper(lorianne, cybel)\nFlatter(maxfield, cybel)\nFlatter(maxfield, lorianne)\nDazzled(maxfield)\nforall x (Detach(x, cybel) -> Flatter(cybel, lorianne))\nforall x (Thorny(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\nDetach(maxfield, sid) -> Detach(sid, lorianne)\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) -> Detach(x, cybel))\nforall x (Flatter(x, sid) and Copper(x, lorianne) -> Functional(lorianne))\nforall x (Flatter(x, cybel) and Functional(x) -> Flatter(x, sid))\nforall x (Copper(x, sid) -> Redoubled(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Dazzled(x) -> Redoubled(x))\n\nFlatter(lorianne, sid)\n\nFlatter(sid, cybel) and Functional(sid) and forall x (Flatter(x, cybel) and Functional(x) -> Flatter(x, sid)) -> therefore Flatter(sid, sid) Flatter(sid, sid) and Copper(sid, lorianne) and forall x (Flatter(x, sid) and Copper(x, lorianne) -> Functional(lorianne)) -> therefore Functional(lorianne) Flatter(lorianne, cybel) and Functional(lorianne) and forall x (Flatter(x, cybel) and Functional(x) -> Flatter(x, sid)) -> therefore Flatter(lorianne, sid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The quint maledict the staffard. The quint maledict the ajay. The quint effeminize the staffard. The quint is unwearable. The staffard maledict the quint. The staffard is unwearable. The staffard demand the quint. The staffard demand the ajay. The staffard demand the osbourn. The ajay maledict the quint. The ajay maledict the osbourn. The ajay is societal. The ajay demand the quint. The osbourn maledict the quint. The osbourn maledict the ajay. The osbourn is overgrown. If something effeminize the quint then the quint maledict the ajay. All petaled things are societal. If the osbourn effeminize the staffard then the staffard effeminize the ajay. If something is societal then it effeminize the quint. If something maledict the staffard and it demand the ajay then the ajay is unwearable. If something maledict the quint and it is unwearable then it maledict the staffard. If something demand the staffard then it is adulterine. All societal, overgrown things are adulterine. The ajay does not chase the staffard.", "logic": "\nMaledict(quint, staffard)\nMaledict(quint, ajay)\nEffeminize(quint, staffard)\nUnwearable(quint)\nMaledict(staffard, quint)\nUnwearable(staffard)\nDemand(staffard, quint)\nDemand(staffard, ajay)\nDemand(staffard, osbourn)\nMaledict(ajay, quint)\nMaledict(ajay, osbourn)\nSocietal(ajay)\nDemand(ajay, quint)\nMaledict(osbourn, quint)\nMaledict(osbourn, ajay)\nOvergrown(osbourn)\nforall x (Effeminize(x, quint) -> Maledict(quint, ajay))\nforall x (Petaled(x) -> Societal(x))\nEffeminize(osbourn, staffard) -> Effeminize(staffard, ajay)\nforall x (Societal(x) -> Effeminize(x, quint))\nforall x (Maledict(x, staffard) and Demand(x, ajay) -> Unwearable(ajay))\nforall x (Maledict(x, quint) and Unwearable(x) -> Maledict(x, staffard))\nforall x (Demand(x, staffard) -> Adulterine(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Adulterine(x))\n\nnot Maledict(ajay, staffard)\n\nMaledict(staffard, quint) and Unwearable(staffard) and forall x (Maledict(x, quint) and Unwearable(x) -> Maledict(x, staffard)) -> therefore Maledict(staffard, staffard) Maledict(staffard, staffard) and Demand(staffard, ajay) and forall x (Maledict(x, staffard) and Demand(x, ajay) -> Unwearable(ajay)) -> therefore Unwearable(ajay) Maledict(ajay, quint) and Unwearable(ajay) and forall x (Maledict(x, quint) and Unwearable(x) -> Maledict(x, staffard)) -> therefore Maledict(ajay, staffard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The lacy conflict the guthry. The lacy conflict the alexia. The lacy sheet the guthry. The lacy is silty. The guthry conflict the lacy. The guthry is silty. The guthry seduce the lacy. The guthry seduce the alexia. The guthry seduce the efram. The alexia conflict the lacy. The alexia conflict the efram. The alexia is achromatic. The alexia seduce the lacy. The efram conflict the lacy. The efram conflict the alexia. The efram is warning. If something sheet the lacy then the lacy conflict the alexia. All lilac things are achromatic. If the efram sheet the guthry then the guthry sheet the alexia. If something is achromatic then it sheet the lacy. If something conflict the guthry and it seduce the alexia then the alexia is silty. If something conflict the lacy and it is silty then it conflict the guthry. If something seduce the guthry then it is costive. All achromatic, warning things are costive. The lacy is not costive.", "logic": "\nConflict(lacy, guthry)\nConflict(lacy, alexia)\nSheet(lacy, guthry)\nSilty(lacy)\nConflict(guthry, lacy)\nSilty(guthry)\nSeduce(guthry, lacy)\nSeduce(guthry, alexia)\nSeduce(guthry, efram)\nConflict(alexia, lacy)\nConflict(alexia, efram)\nAchromatic(alexia)\nSeduce(alexia, lacy)\nConflict(efram, lacy)\nConflict(efram, alexia)\nWarning(efram)\nforall x (Sheet(x, lacy) -> Conflict(lacy, alexia))\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nSheet(efram, guthry) -> Sheet(guthry, alexia)\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Sheet(x, lacy))\nforall x (Conflict(x, guthry) and Seduce(x, alexia) -> Silty(alexia))\nforall x (Conflict(x, lacy) and Silty(x) -> Conflict(x, guthry))\nforall x (Seduce(x, guthry) -> Costive(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) and Warning(x) -> Costive(x))\n\nnot Costive(lacy)\n\nforall x (Seduce(x, guthry) -> Costive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The shelley evolve the aloysia. The shelley evolve the oriana. The shelley masticate the aloysia. The shelley is yemeni. The aloysia evolve the shelley. The aloysia is yemeni. The aloysia spatchcock the shelley. The aloysia spatchcock the oriana. The aloysia spatchcock the thomas. The oriana evolve the shelley. The oriana evolve the thomas. The oriana is acidotic. The oriana spatchcock the shelley. The thomas evolve the shelley. The thomas evolve the oriana. The thomas is deweyan. If something masticate the shelley then the shelley evolve the oriana. All younger things are acidotic. If the thomas masticate the aloysia then the aloysia masticate the oriana. If something is acidotic then it masticate the shelley. If something evolve the aloysia and it spatchcock the oriana then the oriana is yemeni. If something evolve the shelley and it is yemeni then it evolve the aloysia. If something spatchcock the aloysia then it is rheumatoid. All acidotic, deweyan things are rheumatoid. The thomas evolve the aloysia.", "logic": "\nEvolve(shelley, aloysia)\nEvolve(shelley, oriana)\nMasticate(shelley, aloysia)\nYemeni(shelley)\nEvolve(aloysia, shelley)\nYemeni(aloysia)\nSpatchcock(aloysia, shelley)\nSpatchcock(aloysia, oriana)\nSpatchcock(aloysia, thomas)\nEvolve(oriana, shelley)\nEvolve(oriana, thomas)\nAcidotic(oriana)\nSpatchcock(oriana, shelley)\nEvolve(thomas, shelley)\nEvolve(thomas, oriana)\nDeweyan(thomas)\nforall x (Masticate(x, shelley) -> Evolve(shelley, oriana))\nforall x (Younger(x) -> Acidotic(x))\nMasticate(thomas, aloysia) -> Masticate(aloysia, oriana)\nforall x (Acidotic(x) -> Masticate(x, shelley))\nforall x (Evolve(x, aloysia) and Spatchcock(x, oriana) -> Yemeni(oriana))\nforall x (Evolve(x, shelley) and Yemeni(x) -> Evolve(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, aloysia) -> Rheumatoid(x))\nforall x (Acidotic(x) and Deweyan(x) -> Rheumatoid(x))\n\nEvolve(thomas, aloysia)\n\nforall x (Evolve(x, shelley) and Yemeni(x) -> Evolve(x, aloysia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The cybel assess the tera. The cybel assess the louise. The cybel compact the tera. The cybel is amniotic. The tera assess the cybel. The tera is amniotic. The tera upholster the cybel. The tera upholster the louise. The tera upholster the prentice. The louise assess the cybel. The louise assess the prentice. The louise is rapacious. The louise upholster the cybel. The prentice assess the cybel. The prentice assess the louise. The prentice is unsighted. If something compact the cybel then the cybel assess the louise. All prominent things are rapacious. If the prentice compact the tera then the tera compact the louise. If something is rapacious then it compact the cybel. If something assess the tera and it upholster the louise then the louise is amniotic. If something assess the cybel and it is amniotic then it assess the tera. If something upholster the tera then it is noncurrent. All rapacious, unsighted things are noncurrent. The cybel is not rapacious.", "logic": "\nAssess(cybel, tera)\nAssess(cybel, louise)\nCompact(cybel, tera)\nAmniotic(cybel)\nAssess(tera, cybel)\nAmniotic(tera)\nUpholster(tera, cybel)\nUpholster(tera, louise)\nUpholster(tera, prentice)\nAssess(louise, cybel)\nAssess(louise, prentice)\nRapacious(louise)\nUpholster(louise, cybel)\nAssess(prentice, cybel)\nAssess(prentice, louise)\nUnsighted(prentice)\nforall x (Compact(x, cybel) -> Assess(cybel, louise))\nforall x (Prominent(x) -> Rapacious(x))\nCompact(prentice, tera) -> Compact(tera, louise)\nforall x (Rapacious(x) -> Compact(x, cybel))\nforall x (Assess(x, tera) and Upholster(x, louise) -> Amniotic(louise))\nforall x (Assess(x, cybel) and Amniotic(x) -> Assess(x, tera))\nforall x (Upholster(x, tera) -> Noncurrent(x))\nforall x (Rapacious(x) and Unsighted(x) -> Noncurrent(x))\n\nnot Rapacious(cybel)\n\nforall x (Prominent(x) -> Rapacious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The hattie snarf the lowell. The hattie snarf the mark. The hattie help the lowell. The hattie is postictal. The lowell snarf the hattie. The lowell is postictal. The lowell dodge the hattie. The lowell dodge the mark. The lowell dodge the tomi. The mark snarf the hattie. The mark snarf the tomi. The mark is millionth. The mark dodge the hattie. The tomi snarf the hattie. The tomi snarf the mark. The tomi is apodous. If something help the hattie then the hattie snarf the mark. All breeched things are millionth. If the tomi help the lowell then the lowell help the mark. If something is millionth then it help the hattie. If something snarf the lowell and it dodge the mark then the mark is postictal. If something snarf the hattie and it is postictal then it snarf the lowell. If something dodge the lowell then it is humorous. All millionth, apodous things are humorous. The mark is humorous.", "logic": "\nSnarf(hattie, lowell)\nSnarf(hattie, mark)\nHelp(hattie, lowell)\nPostictal(hattie)\nSnarf(lowell, hattie)\nPostictal(lowell)\nDodge(lowell, hattie)\nDodge(lowell, mark)\nDodge(lowell, tomi)\nSnarf(mark, hattie)\nSnarf(mark, tomi)\nMillionth(mark)\nDodge(mark, hattie)\nSnarf(tomi, hattie)\nSnarf(tomi, mark)\nApodous(tomi)\nforall x (Help(x, hattie) -> Snarf(hattie, mark))\nforall x (Breeched(x) -> Millionth(x))\nHelp(tomi, lowell) -> Help(lowell, mark)\nforall x (Millionth(x) -> Help(x, hattie))\nforall x (Snarf(x, lowell) and Dodge(x, mark) -> Postictal(mark))\nforall x (Snarf(x, hattie) and Postictal(x) -> Snarf(x, lowell))\nforall x (Dodge(x, lowell) -> Humorous(x))\nforall x (Millionth(x) and Apodous(x) -> Humorous(x))\n\nHumorous(mark)\n\nforall x (Dodge(x, lowell) -> Humorous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The abdullah inflame the toby. The abdullah inflame the elysia. The abdullah labialize the toby. The abdullah is waning. The toby inflame the abdullah. The toby is waning. The toby brand the abdullah. The toby brand the elysia. The toby brand the blythe. The elysia inflame the abdullah. The elysia inflame the blythe. The elysia is gratis. The elysia brand the abdullah. The blythe inflame the abdullah. The blythe inflame the elysia. The blythe is unshakable. If something labialize the abdullah then the abdullah inflame the elysia. All tubelike things are gratis. If the blythe labialize the toby then the toby labialize the elysia. If something is gratis then it labialize the abdullah. If something inflame the toby and it brand the elysia then the elysia is waning. If something inflame the abdullah and it is waning then it inflame the toby. If something brand the toby then it is yokelish. All gratis, unshakable things are yokelish. The elysia is not tubelike.", "logic": "\nInflame(abdullah, toby)\nInflame(abdullah, elysia)\nLabialize(abdullah, toby)\nWaning(abdullah)\nInflame(toby, abdullah)\nWaning(toby)\nBrand(toby, abdullah)\nBrand(toby, elysia)\nBrand(toby, blythe)\nInflame(elysia, abdullah)\nInflame(elysia, blythe)\nGratis(elysia)\nBrand(elysia, abdullah)\nInflame(blythe, abdullah)\nInflame(blythe, elysia)\nUnshakable(blythe)\nforall x (Labialize(x, abdullah) -> Inflame(abdullah, elysia))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) -> Gratis(x))\nLabialize(blythe, toby) -> Labialize(toby, elysia)\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> Labialize(x, abdullah))\nforall x (Inflame(x, toby) and Brand(x, elysia) -> Waning(elysia))\nforall x (Inflame(x, abdullah) and Waning(x) -> Inflame(x, toby))\nforall x (Brand(x, toby) -> Yokelish(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) and Unshakable(x) -> Yokelish(x))\n\nnot Tubelike(elysia)\n\nnot Tubelike(elysia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The nomi predicate the leanora. The nomi predicate the lisette. The nomi service the leanora. The nomi is seamanly. The leanora predicate the nomi. The leanora is seamanly. The leanora strut the nomi. The leanora strut the lisette. The leanora strut the iormina. The lisette predicate the nomi. The lisette predicate the iormina. The lisette is dynastic. The lisette strut the nomi. The iormina predicate the nomi. The iormina predicate the lisette. The iormina is cuttable. If something service the nomi then the nomi predicate the lisette. All fishy things are dynastic. If the iormina service the leanora then the leanora service the lisette. If something is dynastic then it service the nomi. If something predicate the leanora and it strut the lisette then the lisette is seamanly. If something predicate the nomi and it is seamanly then it predicate the leanora. If something strut the leanora then it is average. All dynastic, cuttable things are average. The nomi strut the nomi.", "logic": "\nPredicate(nomi, leanora)\nPredicate(nomi, lisette)\nService(nomi, leanora)\nSeamanly(nomi)\nPredicate(leanora, nomi)\nSeamanly(leanora)\nStrut(leanora, nomi)\nStrut(leanora, lisette)\nStrut(leanora, iormina)\nPredicate(lisette, nomi)\nPredicate(lisette, iormina)\nDynastic(lisette)\nStrut(lisette, nomi)\nPredicate(iormina, nomi)\nPredicate(iormina, lisette)\nCuttable(iormina)\nforall x (Service(x, nomi) -> Predicate(nomi, lisette))\nforall x (Fishy(x) -> Dynastic(x))\nService(iormina, leanora) -> Service(leanora, lisette)\nforall x (Dynastic(x) -> Service(x, nomi))\nforall x (Predicate(x, leanora) and Strut(x, lisette) -> Seamanly(lisette))\nforall x (Predicate(x, nomi) and Seamanly(x) -> Predicate(x, leanora))\nforall x (Strut(x, leanora) -> Average(x))\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and Cuttable(x) -> Average(x))\n\nStrut(nomi, nomi)\n\nStrut(nomi, nomi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The gaynor premier the dorella. The gaynor premier the harli. The gaynor disappoint the dorella. The gaynor is nicene. The dorella premier the gaynor. The dorella is nicene. The dorella shipwreck the gaynor. The dorella shipwreck the harli. The dorella shipwreck the sheldon. The harli premier the gaynor. The harli premier the sheldon. The harli is judaical. The harli shipwreck the gaynor. The sheldon premier the gaynor. The sheldon premier the harli. The sheldon is seamed. If something disappoint the gaynor then the gaynor premier the harli. All roughhewn things are judaical. If the sheldon disappoint the dorella then the dorella disappoint the harli. If something is judaical then it disappoint the gaynor. If something premier the dorella and it shipwreck the harli then the harli is nicene. If something premier the gaynor and it is nicene then it premier the dorella. If something shipwreck the dorella then it is jawless. All judaical, seamed things are jawless. The gaynor does not eat the harli.", "logic": "\nPremier(gaynor, dorella)\nPremier(gaynor, harli)\nDisappoint(gaynor, dorella)\nNicene(gaynor)\nPremier(dorella, gaynor)\nNicene(dorella)\nShipwreck(dorella, gaynor)\nShipwreck(dorella, harli)\nShipwreck(dorella, sheldon)\nPremier(harli, gaynor)\nPremier(harli, sheldon)\nJudaical(harli)\nShipwreck(harli, gaynor)\nPremier(sheldon, gaynor)\nPremier(sheldon, harli)\nSeamed(sheldon)\nforall x (Disappoint(x, gaynor) -> Premier(gaynor, harli))\nforall x (Roughhewn(x) -> Judaical(x))\nDisappoint(sheldon, dorella) -> Disappoint(dorella, harli)\nforall x (Judaical(x) -> Disappoint(x, gaynor))\nforall x (Premier(x, dorella) and Shipwreck(x, harli) -> Nicene(harli))\nforall x (Premier(x, gaynor) and Nicene(x) -> Premier(x, dorella))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, dorella) -> Jawless(x))\nforall x (Judaical(x) and Seamed(x) -> Jawless(x))\n\nnot Disappoint(gaynor, harli)\n\nnot Disappoint(gaynor, harli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The horst fork the odie. The horst fork the cosetta. The horst install the odie. The horst is burdenless. The odie fork the horst. The odie is burdenless. The odie call the horst. The odie call the cosetta. The odie call the kore. The cosetta fork the horst. The cosetta fork the kore. The cosetta is monopteral. The cosetta call the horst. The kore fork the horst. The kore fork the cosetta. The kore is belittling. If something install the horst then the horst fork the cosetta. All woodsy things are monopteral. If the kore install the odie then the odie install the cosetta. If something is monopteral then it install the horst. If something fork the odie and it call the cosetta then the cosetta is burdenless. If something fork the horst and it is burdenless then it fork the odie. If something call the odie then it is wainscoted. All monopteral, belittling things are wainscoted. The odie fork the cosetta.", "logic": "\nFork(horst, odie)\nFork(horst, cosetta)\nInstall(horst, odie)\nBurdenless(horst)\nFork(odie, horst)\nBurdenless(odie)\nCall(odie, horst)\nCall(odie, cosetta)\nCall(odie, kore)\nFork(cosetta, horst)\nFork(cosetta, kore)\nMonopteral(cosetta)\nCall(cosetta, horst)\nFork(kore, horst)\nFork(kore, cosetta)\nBelittling(kore)\nforall x (Install(x, horst) -> Fork(horst, cosetta))\nforall x (Woodsy(x) -> Monopteral(x))\nInstall(kore, odie) -> Install(odie, cosetta)\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> Install(x, horst))\nforall x (Fork(x, odie) and Call(x, cosetta) -> Burdenless(cosetta))\nforall x (Fork(x, horst) and Burdenless(x) -> Fork(x, odie))\nforall x (Call(x, odie) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and Belittling(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\n\nFork(odie, cosetta)\n\nFork(odie, cosetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "Anissa is numidian. Anissa is hourlong. Anissa is roughdried. Guglielma is numidian. Guglielma is hourlong. Guglielma is tiptop. Jonas is unnoted. Rough people are roughdried. If someone is hourlong and tiptop then they are unexciting. Smart, tiptop people are dangerous. Anissa is numidian.", "logic": "\nNumidian(anissa)\nHourlong(anissa)\nRoughdried(anissa)\nNumidian(guglielma)\nHourlong(guglielma)\nTiptop(guglielma)\nUnnoted(jonas)\nforall x (Unexciting(x) -> Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Hourlong(x) and Tiptop(x) -> Unexciting(x))\nforall x (Roughdried(x) and Tiptop(x) -> Dangerous(x))\n\nNumidian(anissa)\n\ntherefore Numidian(anissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Tre is prudent. Tre is anecdotic. Tre is fourscore. Kaye is prudent. Kaye is anecdotic. Kaye is lame. Lucita is polyphonic. Rough people are fourscore. If someone is anecdotic and lame then they are avellan. Smart, lame people are psychotic. Kaye is not prudent.", "logic": "\nPrudent(tre)\nAnecdotic(tre)\nFourscore(tre)\nPrudent(kaye)\nAnecdotic(kaye)\nLame(kaye)\nPolyphonic(lucita)\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) and Lame(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Lame(x) -> Psychotic(x))\n\nnot Prudent(kaye)\n\ntherefore Prudent(kaye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Vivyan is paediatric. Vivyan is moderato. Vivyan is operculate. Pierre is paediatric. Pierre is moderato. Pierre is boskopoid. Maudie is credal. Rough people are operculate. If someone is moderato and boskopoid then they are homeric. Smart, boskopoid people are neandertal. Pierre is homeric.", "logic": "\nPaediatric(vivyan)\nModerato(vivyan)\nOperculate(vivyan)\nPaediatric(pierre)\nModerato(pierre)\nBoskopoid(pierre)\nCredal(maudie)\nforall x (Homeric(x) -> Operculate(x))\nforall x (Moderato(x) and Boskopoid(x) -> Homeric(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) and Boskopoid(x) -> Neandertal(x))\n\nHomeric(pierre)\n\nModerato(pierre) and Boskopoid(pierre) and forall x (Moderato(x) and Boskopoid(x) -> Homeric(x)) -> therefore Homeric(pierre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Donovan is wayward. Donovan is creamy. Donovan is frizzy. Hazel is wayward. Hazel is creamy. Hazel is stuffed. Courtney is passee. Rough people are frizzy. If someone is creamy and stuffed then they are abusive. Smart, stuffed people are intruding. Hazel is not abusive.", "logic": "\nWayward(donovan)\nCreamy(donovan)\nFrizzy(donovan)\nWayward(hazel)\nCreamy(hazel)\nStuffed(hazel)\nPassee(courtney)\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Frizzy(x))\nforall x (Creamy(x) and Stuffed(x) -> Abusive(x))\nforall x (Frizzy(x) and Stuffed(x) -> Intruding(x))\n\nnot Abusive(hazel)\n\nCreamy(hazel) and Stuffed(hazel) and forall x (Creamy(x) and Stuffed(x) -> Abusive(x)) -> therefore Abusive(hazel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Cal is paralyzed. Cal is adrenal. Cal is urbanised. Dolores is paralyzed. Dolores is adrenal. Dolores is synoicous. Charmine is shintoist. Rough people are urbanised. If someone is adrenal and synoicous then they are coeliac. Smart, synoicous people are waterless. Dolores is urbanised.", "logic": "\nParalyzed(cal)\nAdrenal(cal)\nUrbanised(cal)\nParalyzed(dolores)\nAdrenal(dolores)\nSynoicous(dolores)\nShintoist(charmine)\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Urbanised(x))\nforall x (Adrenal(x) and Synoicous(x) -> Coeliac(x))\nforall x (Urbanised(x) and Synoicous(x) -> Waterless(x))\n\nUrbanised(dolores)\n\nAdrenal(dolores) and Synoicous(dolores) and forall x (Adrenal(x) and Synoicous(x) -> Coeliac(x)) -> therefore Coeliac(dolores) Coeliac(dolores) and forall x (Coeliac(x) -> Urbanised(x)) -> therefore Urbanised(dolores)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Montague is deciduous. Montague is polyoicous. Montague is verbose. Noellyn is deciduous. Noellyn is polyoicous. Noellyn is awless. Gwendolyn is drunken. Rough people are verbose. If someone is polyoicous and awless then they are sublimated. Smart, awless people are sisyphean. Noellyn is not verbose.", "logic": "\nDeciduous(montague)\nPolyoicous(montague)\nVerbose(montague)\nDeciduous(noellyn)\nPolyoicous(noellyn)\nAwless(noellyn)\nDrunken(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> Verbose(x))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) and Awless(x) -> Sublimated(x))\nforall x (Verbose(x) and Awless(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\n\nnot Verbose(noellyn)\n\nPolyoicous(noellyn) and Awless(noellyn) and forall x (Polyoicous(x) and Awless(x) -> Sublimated(x)) -> therefore Sublimated(noellyn) Sublimated(noellyn) and forall x (Sublimated(x) -> Verbose(x)) -> therefore Verbose(noellyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Aubrey is communist. Aubrey is uxorious. Aubrey is unshaded. Hermann is communist. Hermann is uxorious. Hermann is quelled. Sheffy is femoral. Rough people are unshaded. If someone is uxorious and quelled then they are somnolent. Smart, quelled people are moneran. Hermann is moneran.", "logic": "\nCommunist(aubrey)\nUxorious(aubrey)\nUnshaded(aubrey)\nCommunist(hermann)\nUxorious(hermann)\nQuelled(hermann)\nFemoral(sheffy)\nforall x (Somnolent(x) -> Unshaded(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) and Quelled(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nforall x (Unshaded(x) and Quelled(x) -> Moneran(x))\n\nMoneran(hermann)\n\nUxorious(hermann) and Quelled(hermann) and forall x (Uxorious(x) and Quelled(x) -> Somnolent(x)) -> therefore Somnolent(hermann) Somnolent(hermann) and forall x (Somnolent(x) -> Unshaded(x)) -> therefore Unshaded(hermann) Unshaded(hermann) and Quelled(hermann) and forall x (Unshaded(x) and Quelled(x) -> Moneran(x)) -> therefore Moneran(hermann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Towney is childly. Towney is curt. Towney is inborn. Fonsie is childly. Fonsie is curt. Fonsie is diarrhoeic. Hubert is kingly. Rough people are inborn. If someone is curt and diarrhoeic then they are sapphic. Smart, diarrhoeic people are agitated. Fonsie is not agitated.", "logic": "\nChildly(towney)\nCurt(towney)\nInborn(towney)\nChildly(fonsie)\nCurt(fonsie)\nDiarrhoeic(fonsie)\nKingly(hubert)\nforall x (Sapphic(x) -> Inborn(x))\nforall x (Curt(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Sapphic(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Agitated(x))\n\nnot Agitated(fonsie)\n\nCurt(fonsie) and Diarrhoeic(fonsie) and forall x (Curt(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Sapphic(x)) -> therefore Sapphic(fonsie) Sapphic(fonsie) and forall x (Sapphic(x) -> Inborn(x)) -> therefore Inborn(fonsie) Inborn(fonsie) and Diarrhoeic(fonsie) and forall x (Inborn(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Agitated(x)) -> therefore Agitated(fonsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Amelia is awol. Amelia is elliptic. Amelia is malapropos. Kaspar is awol. Kaspar is elliptic. Kaspar is enviable. Leta is odourless. Rough people are malapropos. If someone is elliptic and enviable then they are hibernal. Smart, enviable people are awned. Leta is not malapropos.", "logic": "\nAwol(amelia)\nElliptic(amelia)\nMalapropos(amelia)\nAwol(kaspar)\nElliptic(kaspar)\nEnviable(kaspar)\nOdourless(leta)\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) and Enviable(x) -> Hibernal(x))\nforall x (Malapropos(x) and Enviable(x) -> Awned(x))\n\nnot Malapropos(leta)\n\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Malapropos(x)) <- forall x (Elliptic(x) and Enviable(x) -> Hibernal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Lucita is undefended. Lucita is uneducated. Lucita is unsinkable. Blayne is undefended. Blayne is uneducated. Blayne is separable. Hubert is vitreous. Rough people are unsinkable. If someone is uneducated and separable then they are marginal. Smart, separable people are fleet. Lucita is marginal.", "logic": "\nUndefended(lucita)\nUneducated(lucita)\nUnsinkable(lucita)\nUndefended(blayne)\nUneducated(blayne)\nSeparable(blayne)\nVitreous(hubert)\nforall x (Marginal(x) -> Unsinkable(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Separable(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) and Separable(x) -> Fleet(x))\n\nMarginal(lucita)\n\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Separable(x) -> Marginal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Harmon is damask. Harmon is merited. Harmon is wysiwyg. Pia is damask. Pia is merited. Pia is lanate. Hayes is unruly. Rough people are wysiwyg. If someone is merited and lanate then they are uncivil. Smart, lanate people are consensual. Hayes is not consensual.", "logic": "\nDamask(harmon)\nMerited(harmon)\nWysiwyg(harmon)\nDamask(pia)\nMerited(pia)\nLanate(pia)\nUnruly(hayes)\nforall x (Uncivil(x) -> Wysiwyg(x))\nforall x (Merited(x) and Lanate(x) -> Uncivil(x))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) and Lanate(x) -> Consensual(x))\n\nnot Consensual(hayes)\n\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) and Lanate(x) -> Consensual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Samuel is suborbital. Samuel is needy. Samuel is mitigatory. Pinchas is suborbital. Pinchas is needy. Pinchas is excitatory. Susanna is blasting. Rough people are mitigatory. If someone is needy and excitatory then they are pancreatic. Smart, excitatory people are transeunt. Samuel is transeunt.", "logic": "\nSuborbital(samuel)\nNeedy(samuel)\nMitigatory(samuel)\nSuborbital(pinchas)\nNeedy(pinchas)\nExcitatory(pinchas)\nBlasting(susanna)\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\nforall x (Needy(x) and Excitatory(x) -> Pancreatic(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and Excitatory(x) -> Transeunt(x))\n\nTranseunt(samuel)\n\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and Excitatory(x) -> Transeunt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Jobey is climatical. Jobey is inert. Jobey is queer. Jerold is climatical. Jerold is inert. Jerold is biogenous. Hamel is ingrown. Rough people are queer. If someone is inert and biogenous then they are optimum. Smart, biogenous people are canty. Hamel is not inert.", "logic": "\nClimatical(jobey)\nInert(jobey)\nQueer(jobey)\nClimatical(jerold)\nInert(jerold)\nBiogenous(jerold)\nIngrown(hamel)\nforall x (Optimum(x) -> Queer(x))\nforall x (Inert(x) and Biogenous(x) -> Optimum(x))\nforall x (Queer(x) and Biogenous(x) -> Canty(x))\n\nnot Inert(hamel)\n\nnot Inert(hamel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Edouard is candid. Edouard is rush. Edouard is hominal. Elbertina is candid. Elbertina is rush. Elbertina is calumnious. Cloris is horrendous. Rough people are hominal. If someone is rush and calumnious then they are aerated. Smart, calumnious people are gainful. Elbertina is horrendous.", "logic": "\nCandid(edouard)\nRush(edouard)\nHominal(edouard)\nCandid(elbertina)\nRush(elbertina)\nCalumnious(elbertina)\nHorrendous(cloris)\nforall x (Aerated(x) -> Hominal(x))\nforall x (Rush(x) and Calumnious(x) -> Aerated(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Calumnious(x) -> Gainful(x))\n\nHorrendous(elbertina)\n\nHorrendous(elbertina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Marika is relocated. Marika is verboten. Marika is caramel. Amadeus is relocated. Amadeus is verboten. Amadeus is trusting. Reuven is brickle. Rough people are caramel. If someone is verboten and trusting then they are teen. Smart, trusting people are geodetic. Marika is not brickle.", "logic": "\nRelocated(marika)\nVerboten(marika)\nCaramel(marika)\nRelocated(amadeus)\nVerboten(amadeus)\nTrusting(amadeus)\nBrickle(reuven)\nforall x (Teen(x) -> Caramel(x))\nforall x (Verboten(x) and Trusting(x) -> Teen(x))\nforall x (Caramel(x) and Trusting(x) -> Geodetic(x))\n\nnot Brickle(marika)\n\nnot Brickle(marika) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Clara is dogging. Clara is foaming. Clara is vesicular. Carlota is dogging. Carlota is foaming. Carlota is turkic. Bonny is pitiful. Rough people are vesicular. If someone is foaming and turkic then they are frail. Smart, turkic people are encyclical. Clara is turkic.", "logic": "\nDogging(clara)\nFoaming(clara)\nVesicular(clara)\nDogging(carlota)\nFoaming(carlota)\nTurkic(carlota)\nPitiful(bonny)\nforall x (Frail(x) -> Vesicular(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) and Turkic(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Vesicular(x) and Turkic(x) -> Encyclical(x))\n\nTurkic(clara)\n\nTurkic(clara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Rozina is pungent. Rozina is adverse. Florence is rejoicing. If something is squalid and not adverse then it is rejoicing. If something is rejoicing then it is lovesick. If something is sizeable then it is squalid. All adverse things are not sizeable. All lovesick things are sizeable. If something is adverse and not sizeable then it is pungent. Rozina is adverse.", "logic": "\nPungent(rozina)\nAdverse(rozina)\nRejoicing(florence)\nforall x (Squalid(x) and not Adverse(x) -> Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Rejoicing(x) -> Lovesick(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) -> not Sizeable(x))\nforall x (Lovesick(x) -> Sizeable(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) and not Sizeable(x) -> Pungent(x))\n\nAdverse(rozina)\n\ntherefore Adverse(rozina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Ingeberg is rouged. Ingeberg is tubercular. Constanta is helical. If something is praetorian and not tubercular then it is helical. If something is helical then it is analgetic. If something is minacious then it is praetorian. All tubercular things are not minacious. All analgetic things are minacious. If something is tubercular and not minacious then it is rouged. Ingeberg is not tubercular.", "logic": "\nRouged(ingeberg)\nTubercular(ingeberg)\nHelical(constanta)\nforall x (Praetorian(x) and not Tubercular(x) -> Helical(x))\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Minacious(x) -> Praetorian(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) -> not Minacious(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Minacious(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) and not Minacious(x) -> Rouged(x))\n\nnot Tubercular(ingeberg)\n\ntherefore Tubercular(ingeberg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Sanson is lxxi. Sanson is bronze. Legra is herbaceous. If something is exalting and not bronze then it is herbaceous. If something is herbaceous then it is fumed. If something is ventricose then it is exalting. All bronze things are not ventricose. All fumed things are ventricose. If something is bronze and not ventricose then it is lxxi. Sanson is not ventricose.", "logic": "\nLxxi(sanson)\nBronze(sanson)\nHerbaceous(legra)\nforall x (Exalting(x) and not Bronze(x) -> Herbaceous(x))\nforall x (Herbaceous(x) -> Fumed(x))\nforall x (Ventricose(x) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Bronze(x) -> not Ventricose(x))\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Ventricose(x))\nforall x (Bronze(x) and not Ventricose(x) -> Lxxi(x))\n\nnot Ventricose(sanson)\n\nBronze(sanson) and forall x (Bronze(x) -> not Ventricose(x)) -> therefore not Ventricose(sanson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Sharron is ammoniated. Sharron is nutty. Matthus is foldaway. If something is eurafrican and not nutty then it is foldaway. If something is foldaway then it is rhymeless. If something is stupefied then it is eurafrican. All nutty things are not stupefied. All rhymeless things are stupefied. If something is nutty and not stupefied then it is ammoniated. Matthus is not rhymeless.", "logic": "\nAmmoniated(sharron)\nNutty(sharron)\nFoldaway(matthus)\nforall x (Eurafrican(x) and not Nutty(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Eurafrican(x))\nforall x (Nutty(x) -> not Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Nutty(x) and not Stupefied(x) -> Ammoniated(x))\n\nnot Rhymeless(matthus)\n\nFoldaway(matthus) and forall x (Foldaway(x) -> Rhymeless(x)) -> therefore Rhymeless(matthus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Shelton is unagitated. Shelton is bungling. Maisey is jungian. If something is worst and not bungling then it is jungian. If something is jungian then it is giddy. If something is inhibited then it is worst. All bungling things are not inhibited. All giddy things are inhibited. If something is bungling and not inhibited then it is unagitated. Maisey is inhibited.", "logic": "\nUnagitated(shelton)\nBungling(shelton)\nJungian(maisey)\nforall x (Worst(x) and not Bungling(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Jungian(x) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Inhibited(x) -> Worst(x))\nforall x (Bungling(x) -> not Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Giddy(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Bungling(x) and not Inhibited(x) -> Unagitated(x))\n\nInhibited(maisey)\n\nJungian(maisey) and forall x (Jungian(x) -> Giddy(x)) -> therefore Giddy(maisey) Giddy(maisey) and forall x (Giddy(x) -> Inhibited(x)) -> therefore Inhibited(maisey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Betsey is bigoted. Betsey is suspended. Tammie is homebound. If something is dubious and not suspended then it is homebound. If something is homebound then it is unfinished. If something is undepicted then it is dubious. All suspended things are not undepicted. All unfinished things are undepicted. If something is suspended and not undepicted then it is bigoted. Tammie is not undepicted.", "logic": "\nBigoted(betsey)\nSuspended(betsey)\nHomebound(tammie)\nforall x (Dubious(x) and not Suspended(x) -> Homebound(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Undepicted(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Suspended(x) -> not Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Unfinished(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Suspended(x) and not Undepicted(x) -> Bigoted(x))\n\nnot Undepicted(tammie)\n\nHomebound(tammie) and forall x (Homebound(x) -> Unfinished(x)) -> therefore Unfinished(tammie) Unfinished(tammie) and forall x (Unfinished(x) -> Undepicted(x)) -> therefore Undepicted(tammie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Jacky is liquescent. Jacky is fulgurous. Wilson is monthlong. If something is twelfth and not fulgurous then it is monthlong. If something is monthlong then it is boughless. If something is stilly then it is twelfth. All fulgurous things are not stilly. All boughless things are stilly. If something is fulgurous and not stilly then it is liquescent. Wilson is twelfth.", "logic": "\nLiquescent(jacky)\nFulgurous(jacky)\nMonthlong(wilson)\nforall x (Twelfth(x) and not Fulgurous(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Monthlong(x) -> Boughless(x))\nforall x (Stilly(x) -> Twelfth(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> not Stilly(x))\nforall x (Boughless(x) -> Stilly(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) and not Stilly(x) -> Liquescent(x))\n\nTwelfth(wilson)\n\nMonthlong(wilson) and forall x (Monthlong(x) -> Boughless(x)) -> therefore Boughless(wilson) Boughless(wilson) and forall x (Boughless(x) -> Stilly(x)) -> therefore Stilly(wilson) Stilly(wilson) and forall x (Stilly(x) -> Twelfth(x)) -> therefore Twelfth(wilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Kristal is debonaire. Kristal is opulent. Ashely is diluvial. If something is kitschy and not opulent then it is diluvial. If something is diluvial then it is midget. If something is civilized then it is kitschy. All opulent things are not civilized. All midget things are civilized. If something is opulent and not civilized then it is debonaire. Ashely is not kitschy.", "logic": "\nDebonaire(kristal)\nOpulent(kristal)\nDiluvial(ashely)\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and not Opulent(x) -> Diluvial(x))\nforall x (Diluvial(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Civilized(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Opulent(x) -> not Civilized(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) -> Civilized(x))\nforall x (Opulent(x) and not Civilized(x) -> Debonaire(x))\n\nnot Kitschy(ashely)\n\nDiluvial(ashely) and forall x (Diluvial(x) -> Midget(x)) -> therefore Midget(ashely) Midget(ashely) and forall x (Midget(x) -> Civilized(x)) -> therefore Civilized(ashely) Civilized(ashely) and forall x (Civilized(x) -> Kitschy(x)) -> therefore Kitschy(ashely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Fredric is most. Fredric is dermal. Darth is unsounded. If something is splitting and not dermal then it is unsounded. If something is unsounded then it is unseeyn. If something is unfirm then it is splitting. All dermal things are not unfirm. All unseeyn things are unfirm. If something is dermal and not unfirm then it is most. Fredric is not unseeyn.", "logic": "\nMost(fredric)\nDermal(fredric)\nUnsounded(darth)\nforall x (Splitting(x) and not Dermal(x) -> Unsounded(x))\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Splitting(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) -> not Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and not Unfirm(x) -> Most(x))\n\nnot Unseeyn(fredric)\n\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Unseeyn(x)) <- forall x (Splitting(x) and not Dermal(x) -> Unsounded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Kirbie is lukewarm. Kirbie is papal. Maurise is prussian. If something is feminist and not papal then it is prussian. If something is prussian then it is bistred. If something is patronless then it is feminist. All papal things are not patronless. All bistred things are patronless. If something is papal and not patronless then it is lukewarm. Kirbie is prussian.", "logic": "\nLukewarm(kirbie)\nPapal(kirbie)\nPrussian(maurise)\nforall x (Feminist(x) and not Papal(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Patronless(x) -> Feminist(x))\nforall x (Papal(x) -> not Patronless(x))\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> Patronless(x))\nforall x (Papal(x) and not Patronless(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\n\nPrussian(kirbie)\n\nforall x (Feminist(x) and not Papal(x) -> Prussian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Pavel is rainy. Pavel is adnexal. Jeb is financial. If something is contrived and not adnexal then it is financial. If something is financial then it is neotenic. If something is cyclonal then it is contrived. All adnexal things are not cyclonal. All neotenic things are cyclonal. If something is adnexal and not cyclonal then it is rainy. Jeb is not rainy.", "logic": "\nRainy(pavel)\nAdnexal(pavel)\nFinancial(jeb)\nforall x (Contrived(x) and not Adnexal(x) -> Financial(x))\nforall x (Financial(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) -> Contrived(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) -> not Cyclonal(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Cyclonal(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) and not Cyclonal(x) -> Rainy(x))\n\nnot Rainy(jeb)\n\nforall x (Adnexal(x) and not Cyclonal(x) -> Rainy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Silvia is rostrate. Silvia is oppositive. Shurwood is plangent. If something is imposing and not oppositive then it is plangent. If something is plangent then it is vast. If something is existent then it is imposing. All oppositive things are not existent. All vast things are existent. If something is oppositive and not existent then it is rostrate. Silvia is imposing.", "logic": "\nRostrate(silvia)\nOppositive(silvia)\nPlangent(shurwood)\nforall x (Imposing(x) and not Oppositive(x) -> Plangent(x))\nforall x (Plangent(x) -> Vast(x))\nforall x (Existent(x) -> Imposing(x))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) -> not Existent(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) -> Existent(x))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) and not Existent(x) -> Rostrate(x))\n\nImposing(silvia)\n\nforall x (Existent(x) -> Imposing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Win is unhumorous. Win is exogamous. Jay is semantic. If something is elusive and not exogamous then it is semantic. If something is semantic then it is azure. If something is abstruse then it is elusive. All exogamous things are not abstruse. All azure things are abstruse. If something is exogamous and not abstruse then it is unhumorous. Win is not green.", "logic": "\nUnhumorous(win)\nExogamous(win)\nSemantic(jay)\nforall x (Elusive(x) and not Exogamous(x) -> Semantic(x))\nforall x (Semantic(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Abstruse(x) -> Elusive(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) -> not Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Azure(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) and not Abstruse(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\n\nnot Green(win)\n\nnot Green(win) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Chelsy is prying. Chelsy is concealed. Harold is unbanded. If something is arciform and not concealed then it is unbanded. If something is unbanded then it is irritated. If something is distant then it is arciform. All concealed things are not distant. All irritated things are distant. If something is concealed and not distant then it is prying. Harold is green.", "logic": "\nPrying(chelsy)\nConcealed(chelsy)\nUnbanded(harold)\nforall x (Arciform(x) and not Concealed(x) -> Unbanded(x))\nforall x (Unbanded(x) -> Irritated(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Arciform(x))\nforall x (Concealed(x) -> not Distant(x))\nforall x (Irritated(x) -> Distant(x))\nforall x (Concealed(x) and not Distant(x) -> Prying(x))\n\nGreen(harold)\n\nGreen(harold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Locke is demoniacal. Locke is prenatal. Locke is calendric. Locke is tufted. Locke is laudatory. Ryan is demoniacal. Nat is calendric. Robin is demoniacal. Robin is placeable. Robin is prenatal. Robin is hatless. Robin is tufted. All demoniacal people are hatless. Rough, prenatal people are calendric. All calendric people are demoniacal. If someone is demoniacal and tufted then they are prenatal. All placeable, demoniacal people are tufted. If someone is demoniacal and calendric then they are placeable. Locke is laudatory.", "logic": "\nDemoniacal(locke)\nPrenatal(locke)\nCalendric(locke)\nTufted(locke)\nLaudatory(locke)\nDemoniacal(ryan)\nCalendric(nat)\nDemoniacal(robin)\nPlaceable(robin)\nPrenatal(robin)\nHatless(robin)\nTufted(robin)\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) -> Hatless(x))\nforall x (Hatless(x) and Prenatal(x) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) and Tufted(x) -> Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Placeable(x) and Demoniacal(x) -> Tufted(x))\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) and Calendric(x) -> Placeable(x))\n\nLaudatory(locke)\n\ntherefore Laudatory(locke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Ardenia is wrothful. Ardenia is comforting. Ardenia is disposable. Ardenia is womanlike. Ardenia is turbid. Olaf is wrothful. Angil is disposable. Amalle is wrothful. Amalle is unmedical. Amalle is comforting. Amalle is steepish. Amalle is womanlike. All wrothful people are steepish. Rough, comforting people are disposable. All disposable people are wrothful. If someone is wrothful and womanlike then they are comforting. All unmedical, wrothful people are womanlike. If someone is wrothful and disposable then they are unmedical. Amalle is not steepish.", "logic": "\nWrothful(ardenia)\nComforting(ardenia)\nDisposable(ardenia)\nWomanlike(ardenia)\nTurbid(ardenia)\nWrothful(olaf)\nDisposable(angil)\nWrothful(amalle)\nUnmedical(amalle)\nComforting(amalle)\nSteepish(amalle)\nWomanlike(amalle)\nforall x (Wrothful(x) -> Steepish(x))\nforall x (Steepish(x) and Comforting(x) -> Disposable(x))\nforall x (Disposable(x) -> Wrothful(x))\nforall x (Wrothful(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Comforting(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) and Wrothful(x) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Wrothful(x) and Disposable(x) -> Unmedical(x))\n\nnot Steepish(amalle)\n\ntherefore Steepish(amalle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Merril is dotty. Merril is dictated. Merril is dotted. Merril is boxed. Merril is paramount. Janetta is dotty. Paule is dotted. Priscilla is dotty. Priscilla is smug. Priscilla is dictated. Priscilla is ptolemaic. Priscilla is boxed. All dotty people are ptolemaic. Rough, dictated people are dotted. All dotted people are dotty. If someone is dotty and boxed then they are dictated. All smug, dotty people are boxed. If someone is dotty and dotted then they are smug. Priscilla is dotted.", "logic": "\nDotty(merril)\nDictated(merril)\nDotted(merril)\nBoxed(merril)\nParamount(merril)\nDotty(janetta)\nDotted(paule)\nDotty(priscilla)\nSmug(priscilla)\nDictated(priscilla)\nPtolemaic(priscilla)\nBoxed(priscilla)\nforall x (Dotty(x) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Dictated(x) -> Dotted(x))\nforall x (Dotted(x) -> Dotty(x))\nforall x (Dotty(x) and Boxed(x) -> Dictated(x))\nforall x (Smug(x) and Dotty(x) -> Boxed(x))\nforall x (Dotty(x) and Dotted(x) -> Smug(x))\n\nDotted(priscilla)\n\nPtolemaic(priscilla) and Dictated(priscilla) and forall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Dictated(x) -> Dotted(x)) -> therefore Dotted(priscilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Vasilis is shelled. Vasilis is unbiassed. Vasilis is kampuchean. Vasilis is bothersome. Vasilis is provencal. Franny is shelled. Nolie is kampuchean. Camila is shelled. Camila is primaeval. Camila is unbiassed. Camila is undraped. Camila is bothersome. All shelled people are undraped. Rough, unbiassed people are kampuchean. All kampuchean people are shelled. If someone is shelled and bothersome then they are unbiassed. All primaeval, shelled people are bothersome. If someone is shelled and kampuchean then they are primaeval. Franny is not undraped.", "logic": "\nShelled(vasilis)\nUnbiassed(vasilis)\nKampuchean(vasilis)\nBothersome(vasilis)\nProvencal(vasilis)\nShelled(franny)\nKampuchean(nolie)\nShelled(camila)\nPrimaeval(camila)\nUnbiassed(camila)\nUndraped(camila)\nBothersome(camila)\nforall x (Shelled(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Undraped(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Kampuchean(x))\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Shelled(x))\nforall x (Shelled(x) and Bothersome(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Primaeval(x) and Shelled(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nforall x (Shelled(x) and Kampuchean(x) -> Primaeval(x))\n\nnot Undraped(franny)\n\nShelled(franny) and forall x (Shelled(x) -> Undraped(x)) -> therefore Undraped(franny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Garry is admittable. Garry is intense. Garry is uninspired. Garry is clausal. Garry is kampuchean. Raj is admittable. Adair is uninspired. Gretta is admittable. Gretta is congenital. Gretta is intense. Gretta is lubricious. Gretta is clausal. All admittable people are lubricious. Rough, intense people are uninspired. All uninspired people are admittable. If someone is admittable and clausal then they are intense. All congenital, admittable people are clausal. If someone is admittable and uninspired then they are congenital. Adair is lubricious.", "logic": "\nAdmittable(garry)\nIntense(garry)\nUninspired(garry)\nClausal(garry)\nKampuchean(garry)\nAdmittable(raj)\nUninspired(adair)\nAdmittable(gretta)\nCongenital(gretta)\nIntense(gretta)\nLubricious(gretta)\nClausal(gretta)\nforall x (Admittable(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Intense(x) -> Uninspired(x))\nforall x (Uninspired(x) -> Admittable(x))\nforall x (Admittable(x) and Clausal(x) -> Intense(x))\nforall x (Congenital(x) and Admittable(x) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Admittable(x) and Uninspired(x) -> Congenital(x))\n\nLubricious(adair)\n\nUninspired(adair) and forall x (Uninspired(x) -> Admittable(x)) -> therefore Admittable(adair) Admittable(adair) and forall x (Admittable(x) -> Lubricious(x)) -> therefore Lubricious(adair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Lawson is unready. Lawson is romaic. Lawson is urceolate. Lawson is serial. Lawson is arborary. Emily is unready. Emmett is urceolate. Emmey is unready. Emmey is womanlike. Emmey is romaic. Emmey is flowered. Emmey is serial. All unready people are flowered. Rough, romaic people are urceolate. All urceolate people are unready. If someone is unready and serial then they are romaic. All womanlike, unready people are serial. If someone is unready and urceolate then they are womanlike. Emmett is not flowered.", "logic": "\nUnready(lawson)\nRomaic(lawson)\nUrceolate(lawson)\nSerial(lawson)\nArborary(lawson)\nUnready(emily)\nUrceolate(emmett)\nUnready(emmey)\nWomanlike(emmey)\nRomaic(emmey)\nFlowered(emmey)\nSerial(emmey)\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Romaic(x) -> Urceolate(x))\nforall x (Urceolate(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Serial(x) -> Romaic(x))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) and Unready(x) -> Serial(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Urceolate(x) -> Womanlike(x))\n\nnot Flowered(emmett)\n\nUrceolate(emmett) and forall x (Urceolate(x) -> Unready(x)) -> therefore Unready(emmett) Unready(emmett) and forall x (Unready(x) -> Flowered(x)) -> therefore Flowered(emmett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Elwin is leading. Elwin is methodical. Elwin is pectoral. Elwin is presumable. Elwin is downtown. Cherish is leading. Eleonora is pectoral. Rafaela is leading. Rafaela is offstage. Rafaela is methodical. Rafaela is hepatic. Rafaela is presumable. All leading people are hepatic. Rough, methodical people are pectoral. All pectoral people are leading. If someone is leading and presumable then they are methodical. All offstage, leading people are presumable. If someone is leading and pectoral then they are offstage. Eleonora is presumable.", "logic": "\nLeading(elwin)\nMethodical(elwin)\nPectoral(elwin)\nPresumable(elwin)\nDowntown(elwin)\nLeading(cherish)\nPectoral(eleonora)\nLeading(rafaela)\nOffstage(rafaela)\nMethodical(rafaela)\nHepatic(rafaela)\nPresumable(rafaela)\nforall x (Leading(x) -> Hepatic(x))\nforall x (Hepatic(x) and Methodical(x) -> Pectoral(x))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Leading(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) and Presumable(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Offstage(x) and Leading(x) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) and Pectoral(x) -> Offstage(x))\n\nPresumable(eleonora)\n\nPectoral(eleonora) and forall x (Pectoral(x) -> Leading(x)) -> therefore Leading(eleonora) Leading(eleonora) and Pectoral(eleonora) and forall x (Leading(x) and Pectoral(x) -> Offstage(x)) -> therefore Offstage(eleonora) Pectoral(eleonora) and forall x (Pectoral(x) -> Leading(x)) -> therefore Leading(eleonora) Offstage(eleonora) and Leading(eleonora) and forall x (Offstage(x) and Leading(x) -> Presumable(x)) -> therefore Presumable(eleonora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Willey is christly. Willey is gonadal. Willey is kenyan. Willey is moneyless. Willey is discoid. Brittney is christly. Willy is kenyan. Guillaume is christly. Guillaume is isometric. Guillaume is gonadal. Guillaume is splenic. Guillaume is moneyless. All christly people are splenic. Rough, gonadal people are kenyan. All kenyan people are christly. If someone is christly and moneyless then they are gonadal. All isometric, christly people are moneyless. If someone is christly and kenyan then they are isometric. Willy is not moneyless.", "logic": "\nChristly(willey)\nGonadal(willey)\nKenyan(willey)\nMoneyless(willey)\nDiscoid(willey)\nChristly(brittney)\nKenyan(willy)\nChristly(guillaume)\nIsometric(guillaume)\nGonadal(guillaume)\nSplenic(guillaume)\nMoneyless(guillaume)\nforall x (Christly(x) -> Splenic(x))\nforall x (Splenic(x) and Gonadal(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nforall x (Kenyan(x) -> Christly(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) and Moneyless(x) -> Gonadal(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) and Christly(x) -> Moneyless(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) and Kenyan(x) -> Isometric(x))\n\nnot Moneyless(willy)\n\nKenyan(willy) and forall x (Kenyan(x) -> Christly(x)) -> therefore Christly(willy) Christly(willy) and Kenyan(willy) and forall x (Christly(x) and Kenyan(x) -> Isometric(x)) -> therefore Isometric(willy) Kenyan(willy) and forall x (Kenyan(x) -> Christly(x)) -> therefore Christly(willy) Isometric(willy) and Christly(willy) and forall x (Isometric(x) and Christly(x) -> Moneyless(x)) -> therefore Moneyless(willy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Zaria is coriaceous. Zaria is delimited. Zaria is dependent. Zaria is arborous. Zaria is discerning. Dulcy is coriaceous. Izabel is dependent. Shirlene is coriaceous. Shirlene is arguable. Shirlene is delimited. Shirlene is beery. Shirlene is arborous. All coriaceous people are beery. Rough, delimited people are dependent. All dependent people are coriaceous. If someone is coriaceous and arborous then they are delimited. All arguable, coriaceous people are arborous. If someone is coriaceous and dependent then they are arguable. Dulcy is not delimited.", "logic": "\nCoriaceous(zaria)\nDelimited(zaria)\nDependent(zaria)\nArborous(zaria)\nDiscerning(zaria)\nCoriaceous(dulcy)\nDependent(izabel)\nCoriaceous(shirlene)\nArguable(shirlene)\nDelimited(shirlene)\nBeery(shirlene)\nArborous(shirlene)\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) and Delimited(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and Arborous(x) -> Delimited(x))\nforall x (Arguable(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Arborous(x))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and Dependent(x) -> Arguable(x))\n\nnot Delimited(dulcy)\n\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and Arborous(x) -> Delimited(x)) <- forall x (Arguable(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Arborous(x)) <- forall x (Coriaceous(x) and Dependent(x) -> Arguable(x)) <- forall x (Beery(x) and Delimited(x) -> Dependent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Miguela is vehement. Miguela is wooly. Miguela is variegated. Miguela is routine. Miguela is blockading. Harwell is vehement. Corrianne is variegated. Lorna is vehement. Lorna is unsealed. Lorna is wooly. Lorna is hassidic. Lorna is routine. All vehement people are hassidic. Rough, wooly people are variegated. All variegated people are vehement. If someone is vehement and routine then they are wooly. All unsealed, vehement people are routine. If someone is vehement and variegated then they are unsealed. Harwell is variegated.", "logic": "\nVehement(miguela)\nWooly(miguela)\nVariegated(miguela)\nRoutine(miguela)\nBlockading(miguela)\nVehement(harwell)\nVariegated(corrianne)\nVehement(lorna)\nUnsealed(lorna)\nWooly(lorna)\nHassidic(lorna)\nRoutine(lorna)\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Hassidic(x) and Wooly(x) -> Variegated(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) -> Vehement(x))\nforall x (Vehement(x) and Routine(x) -> Wooly(x))\nforall x (Unsealed(x) and Vehement(x) -> Routine(x))\nforall x (Vehement(x) and Variegated(x) -> Unsealed(x))\n\nVariegated(harwell)\n\nforall x (Hassidic(x) and Wooly(x) -> Variegated(x)) <- forall x (Vehement(x) and Routine(x) -> Wooly(x)) <- forall x (Unsealed(x) and Vehement(x) -> Routine(x)) <- forall x (Vehement(x) and Variegated(x) -> Unsealed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Donn is untethered. Donn is analeptic. Donn is multiform. Donn is solvable. Donn is sympatric. Bearnard is untethered. Wilber is multiform. Clarisa is untethered. Clarisa is drugless. Clarisa is analeptic. Clarisa is feral. Clarisa is solvable. All untethered people are feral. Rough, analeptic people are multiform. All multiform people are untethered. If someone is untethered and solvable then they are analeptic. All drugless, untethered people are solvable. If someone is untethered and multiform then they are drugless. Bearnard is not solvable.", "logic": "\nUntethered(donn)\nAnaleptic(donn)\nMultiform(donn)\nSolvable(donn)\nSympatric(donn)\nUntethered(bearnard)\nMultiform(wilber)\nUntethered(clarisa)\nDrugless(clarisa)\nAnaleptic(clarisa)\nFeral(clarisa)\nSolvable(clarisa)\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Feral(x) and Analeptic(x) -> Multiform(x))\nforall x (Multiform(x) -> Untethered(x))\nforall x (Untethered(x) and Solvable(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) and Untethered(x) -> Solvable(x))\nforall x (Untethered(x) and Multiform(x) -> Drugless(x))\n\nnot Solvable(bearnard)\n\nforall x (Drugless(x) and Untethered(x) -> Solvable(x)) <- forall x (Untethered(x) and Multiform(x) -> Drugless(x)) <- forall x (Feral(x) and Analeptic(x) -> Multiform(x)) <- forall x (Untethered(x) and Solvable(x) -> Analeptic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Lesya is unready. Lesya is censorious. Lesya is astragalar. Lesya is imminent. Lesya is thrifty. Graham is unready. Evy is astragalar. Kerrie is unready. Kerrie is tyrannic. Kerrie is censorious. Kerrie is rotational. Kerrie is imminent. All unready people are rotational. Rough, censorious people are astragalar. All astragalar people are unready. If someone is unready and imminent then they are censorious. All tyrannic, unready people are imminent. If someone is unready and astragalar then they are tyrannic. Graham is tyrannic.", "logic": "\nUnready(lesya)\nCensorious(lesya)\nAstragalar(lesya)\nImminent(lesya)\nThrifty(lesya)\nUnready(graham)\nAstragalar(evy)\nUnready(kerrie)\nTyrannic(kerrie)\nCensorious(kerrie)\nRotational(kerrie)\nImminent(kerrie)\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Rotational(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) and Censorious(x) -> Astragalar(x))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Imminent(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Tyrannic(x) and Unready(x) -> Imminent(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Astragalar(x) -> Tyrannic(x))\n\nTyrannic(graham)\n\nforall x (Unready(x) and Astragalar(x) -> Tyrannic(x)) <- forall x (Rotational(x) and Censorious(x) -> Astragalar(x)) <- forall x (Unready(x) and Imminent(x) -> Censorious(x)) <- forall x (Tyrannic(x) and Unready(x) -> Imminent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Talyah is catalan. Talyah is despotic. Talyah is rickety. Talyah is toadyish. Talyah is gallant. Pamella is catalan. Gertie is rickety. Lillian is catalan. Lillian is increased. Lillian is despotic. Lillian is crowing. Lillian is toadyish. All catalan people are crowing. Rough, despotic people are rickety. All rickety people are catalan. If someone is catalan and toadyish then they are despotic. All increased, catalan people are toadyish. If someone is catalan and rickety then they are increased. Gertie is not gallant.", "logic": "\nCatalan(talyah)\nDespotic(talyah)\nRickety(talyah)\nToadyish(talyah)\nGallant(talyah)\nCatalan(pamella)\nRickety(gertie)\nCatalan(lillian)\nIncreased(lillian)\nDespotic(lillian)\nCrowing(lillian)\nToadyish(lillian)\nforall x (Catalan(x) -> Crowing(x))\nforall x (Crowing(x) and Despotic(x) -> Rickety(x))\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> Catalan(x))\nforall x (Catalan(x) and Toadyish(x) -> Despotic(x))\nforall x (Increased(x) and Catalan(x) -> Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Catalan(x) and Rickety(x) -> Increased(x))\n\nnot Gallant(gertie)\n\nnot Gallant(gertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Hatty is bacteroid. Hatty is limber. Hatty is calico. Hatty is monodic. Hatty is neighborly. Maddie is bacteroid. Sasha is calico. Cabrina is bacteroid. Cabrina is bohemian. Cabrina is limber. Cabrina is aimless. Cabrina is monodic. All bacteroid people are aimless. Rough, limber people are calico. All calico people are bacteroid. If someone is bacteroid and monodic then they are limber. All bohemian, bacteroid people are monodic. If someone is bacteroid and calico then they are bohemian. Maddie is neighborly.", "logic": "\nBacteroid(hatty)\nLimber(hatty)\nCalico(hatty)\nMonodic(hatty)\nNeighborly(hatty)\nBacteroid(maddie)\nCalico(sasha)\nBacteroid(cabrina)\nBohemian(cabrina)\nLimber(cabrina)\nAimless(cabrina)\nMonodic(cabrina)\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Aimless(x))\nforall x (Aimless(x) and Limber(x) -> Calico(x))\nforall x (Calico(x) -> Bacteroid(x))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) and Monodic(x) -> Limber(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Bacteroid(x) -> Monodic(x))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) and Calico(x) -> Bohemian(x))\n\nNeighborly(maddie)\n\nNeighborly(maddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Merry is sanctified. Cortney is saxicolous. Bunnie is general. If Merry is sanctified then Merry is renewing. If Bunnie is renewing and Bunnie is general then Bunnie is sanctified. If someone is renewing then they are general. Young people are partitive. If Cortney is catalectic then Cortney is saxicolous. If Cortney is partitive and Cortney is considered then Cortney is renewing. Merry is sanctified.", "logic": "\nSanctified(merry)\nSaxicolous(cortney)\nGeneral(bunnie)\nSanctified(merry) -> Renewing(merry)\nRenewing(bunnie) and General(bunnie) -> Sanctified(bunnie)\nforall x (Renewing(x) -> General(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Partitive(x))\nCatalectic(cortney) -> Saxicolous(cortney)\nPartitive(cortney) and Considered(cortney) -> Renewing(cortney)\n\nSanctified(merry)\n\ntherefore Sanctified(merry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Perri is supplicant. Kara is pass. Esther is tousled. If Perri is supplicant then Perri is proved. If Esther is proved and Esther is tousled then Esther is supplicant. If someone is proved then they are tousled. Young people are lamplit. If Kara is untipped then Kara is pass. If Kara is lamplit and Kara is matching then Kara is proved. Esther is not tousled.", "logic": "\nSupplicant(perri)\nPass(kara)\nTousled(esther)\nSupplicant(perri) -> Proved(perri)\nProved(esther) and Tousled(esther) -> Supplicant(esther)\nforall x (Proved(x) -> Tousled(x))\nforall x (Tousled(x) -> Lamplit(x))\nUntipped(kara) -> Pass(kara)\nLamplit(kara) and Matching(kara) -> Proved(kara)\n\nnot Tousled(esther)\n\ntherefore Tousled(esther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Jethro is turkic. Aubine is dapper. Eugenia is unclothed. If Jethro is turkic then Jethro is gushing. If Eugenia is gushing and Eugenia is unclothed then Eugenia is turkic. If someone is gushing then they are unclothed. Young people are used. If Aubine is ascetical then Aubine is dapper. If Aubine is used and Aubine is ptolemaic then Aubine is gushing. Eugenia is used.", "logic": "\nTurkic(jethro)\nDapper(aubine)\nUnclothed(eugenia)\nTurkic(jethro) -> Gushing(jethro)\nGushing(eugenia) and Unclothed(eugenia) -> Turkic(eugenia)\nforall x (Gushing(x) -> Unclothed(x))\nforall x (Unclothed(x) -> Used(x))\nAscetical(aubine) -> Dapper(aubine)\nUsed(aubine) and Ptolemaic(aubine) -> Gushing(aubine)\n\nUsed(eugenia)\n\nUnclothed(eugenia) and forall x (Unclothed(x) -> Used(x)) -> therefore Used(eugenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Elwood is whimsical. Meghann is protozoal. Olenka is receding. If Elwood is whimsical then Elwood is bated. If Olenka is bated and Olenka is receding then Olenka is whimsical. If someone is bated then they are receding. Young people are superior. If Meghann is rationed then Meghann is protozoal. If Meghann is superior and Meghann is avionic then Meghann is bated. Elwood is not bated.", "logic": "\nWhimsical(elwood)\nProtozoal(meghann)\nReceding(olenka)\nWhimsical(elwood) -> Bated(elwood)\nBated(olenka) and Receding(olenka) -> Whimsical(olenka)\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Receding(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> Superior(x))\nRationed(meghann) -> Protozoal(meghann)\nSuperior(meghann) and Avionic(meghann) -> Bated(meghann)\n\nnot Bated(elwood)\n\nWhimsical(elwood) and Whimsical(elwood) -> Bated(elwood) -> therefore Bated(elwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Jessalyn is enervated. Sharona is weaponed. Rosetta is retral. If Jessalyn is enervated then Jessalyn is disarrayed. If Rosetta is disarrayed and Rosetta is retral then Rosetta is enervated. If someone is disarrayed then they are retral. Young people are hardened. If Sharona is skillful then Sharona is weaponed. If Sharona is hardened and Sharona is avocado then Sharona is disarrayed. Jessalyn is retral.", "logic": "\nEnervated(jessalyn)\nWeaponed(sharona)\nRetral(rosetta)\nEnervated(jessalyn) -> Disarrayed(jessalyn)\nDisarrayed(rosetta) and Retral(rosetta) -> Enervated(rosetta)\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) -> Retral(x))\nforall x (Retral(x) -> Hardened(x))\nSkillful(sharona) -> Weaponed(sharona)\nHardened(sharona) and Avocado(sharona) -> Disarrayed(sharona)\n\nRetral(jessalyn)\n\nEnervated(jessalyn) and Enervated(jessalyn) -> Disarrayed(jessalyn) -> therefore Disarrayed(jessalyn) Disarrayed(jessalyn) and forall x (Disarrayed(x) -> Retral(x)) -> therefore Retral(jessalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Sande is paschal. Joyan is rhapsodic. Austine is teensy. If Sande is paschal then Sande is patristic. If Austine is patristic and Austine is teensy then Austine is paschal. If someone is patristic then they are teensy. Young people are donatist. If Joyan is paroxysmal then Joyan is rhapsodic. If Joyan is donatist and Joyan is congestive then Joyan is patristic. Sande is not teensy.", "logic": "\nPaschal(sande)\nRhapsodic(joyan)\nTeensy(austine)\nPaschal(sande) -> Patristic(sande)\nPatristic(austine) and Teensy(austine) -> Paschal(austine)\nforall x (Patristic(x) -> Teensy(x))\nforall x (Teensy(x) -> Donatist(x))\nParoxysmal(joyan) -> Rhapsodic(joyan)\nDonatist(joyan) and Congestive(joyan) -> Patristic(joyan)\n\nnot Teensy(sande)\n\nPaschal(sande) and Paschal(sande) -> Patristic(sande) -> therefore Patristic(sande) Patristic(sande) and forall x (Patristic(x) -> Teensy(x)) -> therefore Teensy(sande)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Orlando is unaltered. Veronika is choppy. Dwain is buttonlike. If Orlando is unaltered then Orlando is afebrile. If Dwain is afebrile and Dwain is buttonlike then Dwain is unaltered. If someone is afebrile then they are buttonlike. Young people are impeded. If Veronika is accepted then Veronika is choppy. If Veronika is impeded and Veronika is homologic then Veronika is afebrile. Orlando is impeded.", "logic": "\nUnaltered(orlando)\nChoppy(veronika)\nButtonlike(dwain)\nUnaltered(orlando) -> Afebrile(orlando)\nAfebrile(dwain) and Buttonlike(dwain) -> Unaltered(dwain)\nforall x (Afebrile(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Impeded(x))\nAccepted(veronika) -> Choppy(veronika)\nImpeded(veronika) and Homologic(veronika) -> Afebrile(veronika)\n\nImpeded(orlando)\n\nUnaltered(orlando) and Unaltered(orlando) -> Afebrile(orlando) -> therefore Afebrile(orlando) Afebrile(orlando) and forall x (Afebrile(x) -> Buttonlike(x)) -> therefore Buttonlike(orlando) Buttonlike(orlando) and forall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Impeded(x)) -> therefore Impeded(orlando)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Stefanie is stripy. Danell is localised. Sinclair is symbolic. If Stefanie is stripy then Stefanie is radiant. If Sinclair is radiant and Sinclair is symbolic then Sinclair is stripy. If someone is radiant then they are symbolic. Young people are moire. If Danell is worldly then Danell is localised. If Danell is moire and Danell is esthetic then Danell is radiant. Stefanie is not moire.", "logic": "\nStripy(stefanie)\nLocalised(danell)\nSymbolic(sinclair)\nStripy(stefanie) -> Radiant(stefanie)\nRadiant(sinclair) and Symbolic(sinclair) -> Stripy(sinclair)\nforall x (Radiant(x) -> Symbolic(x))\nforall x (Symbolic(x) -> Moire(x))\nWorldly(danell) -> Localised(danell)\nMoire(danell) and Esthetic(danell) -> Radiant(danell)\n\nnot Moire(stefanie)\n\nStripy(stefanie) and Stripy(stefanie) -> Radiant(stefanie) -> therefore Radiant(stefanie) Radiant(stefanie) and forall x (Radiant(x) -> Symbolic(x)) -> therefore Symbolic(stefanie) Symbolic(stefanie) and forall x (Symbolic(x) -> Moire(x)) -> therefore Moire(stefanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Cassondra is sophistic. Lida is dumpy. Robinson is automotive. If Cassondra is sophistic then Cassondra is fearless. If Robinson is fearless and Robinson is automotive then Robinson is sophistic. If someone is fearless then they are automotive. Young people are unexacting. If Lida is gathered then Lida is dumpy. If Lida is unexacting and Lida is noxious then Lida is fearless. Robinson is not sophistic.", "logic": "\nSophistic(cassondra)\nDumpy(lida)\nAutomotive(robinson)\nSophistic(cassondra) -> Fearless(cassondra)\nFearless(robinson) and Automotive(robinson) -> Sophistic(robinson)\nforall x (Fearless(x) -> Automotive(x))\nforall x (Automotive(x) -> Unexacting(x))\nGathered(lida) -> Dumpy(lida)\nUnexacting(lida) and Noxious(lida) -> Fearless(lida)\n\nnot Sophistic(robinson)\n\nFearless(robinson) and Automotive(robinson) -> Sophistic(robinson) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Lynde is meiotic. Vilma is churlish. Kessia is sevenfold. If Lynde is meiotic then Lynde is unavenged. If Kessia is unavenged and Kessia is sevenfold then Kessia is meiotic. If someone is unavenged then they are sevenfold. Young people are unsated. If Vilma is bully then Vilma is churlish. If Vilma is unsated and Vilma is honeyed then Vilma is unavenged. Vilma is sevenfold.", "logic": "\nMeiotic(lynde)\nChurlish(vilma)\nSevenfold(kessia)\nMeiotic(lynde) -> Unavenged(lynde)\nUnavenged(kessia) and Sevenfold(kessia) -> Meiotic(kessia)\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> Sevenfold(x))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) -> Unsated(x))\nBully(vilma) -> Churlish(vilma)\nUnsated(vilma) and Honeyed(vilma) -> Unavenged(vilma)\n\nSevenfold(vilma)\n\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> Sevenfold(x)) <- Unsated(vilma) and Honeyed(vilma) -> Unavenged(vilma) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Ree is permeating. Wyatt is parlous. Rem is scrupulous. If Ree is permeating then Ree is unabashed. If Rem is unabashed and Rem is scrupulous then Rem is permeating. If someone is unabashed then they are scrupulous. Young people are aground. If Wyatt is ungulated then Wyatt is parlous. If Wyatt is aground and Wyatt is marine then Wyatt is unabashed. Wyatt is not unabashed.", "logic": "\nPermeating(ree)\nParlous(wyatt)\nScrupulous(rem)\nPermeating(ree) -> Unabashed(ree)\nUnabashed(rem) and Scrupulous(rem) -> Permeating(rem)\nforall x (Unabashed(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Aground(x))\nUngulated(wyatt) -> Parlous(wyatt)\nAground(wyatt) and Marine(wyatt) -> Unabashed(wyatt)\n\nnot Unabashed(wyatt)\n\nAground(wyatt) and Marine(wyatt) -> Unabashed(wyatt) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Archie is chapleted. Godard is christian. Osborne is tomentous. If Archie is chapleted then Archie is shaved. If Osborne is shaved and Osborne is tomentous then Osborne is chapleted. If someone is shaved then they are tomentous. Young people are nasal. If Godard is conceptive then Godard is christian. If Godard is nasal and Godard is mantic then Godard is shaved. Godard is nasal.", "logic": "\nChapleted(archie)\nChristian(godard)\nTomentous(osborne)\nChapleted(archie) -> Shaved(archie)\nShaved(osborne) and Tomentous(osborne) -> Chapleted(osborne)\nforall x (Shaved(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Nasal(x))\nConceptive(godard) -> Christian(godard)\nNasal(godard) and Mantic(godard) -> Shaved(godard)\n\nNasal(godard)\n\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Nasal(x)) <- forall x (Shaved(x) -> Tomentous(x)) <- Nasal(godard) and Mantic(godard) -> Shaved(godard) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Annadiana is unsnarled. Albertine is crusty. Rodolph is fucking. If Annadiana is unsnarled then Annadiana is invitatory. If Rodolph is invitatory and Rodolph is fucking then Rodolph is unsnarled. If someone is invitatory then they are fucking. Young people are maiden. If Albertine is outraged then Albertine is crusty. If Albertine is maiden and Albertine is unsworn then Albertine is invitatory. Rodolph is not invitatory.", "logic": "\nUnsnarled(annadiana)\nCrusty(albertine)\nFucking(rodolph)\nUnsnarled(annadiana) -> Invitatory(annadiana)\nInvitatory(rodolph) and Fucking(rodolph) -> Unsnarled(rodolph)\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Fucking(x))\nforall x (Fucking(x) -> Maiden(x))\nOutraged(albertine) -> Crusty(albertine)\nMaiden(albertine) and Unsworn(albertine) -> Invitatory(albertine)\n\nnot Invitatory(rodolph)\n\nnot Invitatory(rodolph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Lawton is stroppy. Rory is stupefying. Shandee is colonial. If Lawton is stroppy then Lawton is uniovulate. If Shandee is uniovulate and Shandee is colonial then Shandee is stroppy. If someone is uniovulate then they are colonial. Young people are biologic. If Rory is serflike then Rory is stupefying. If Rory is biologic and Rory is unsanitary then Rory is uniovulate. Rory is stroppy.", "logic": "\nStroppy(lawton)\nStupefying(rory)\nColonial(shandee)\nStroppy(lawton) -> Uniovulate(lawton)\nUniovulate(shandee) and Colonial(shandee) -> Stroppy(shandee)\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> Colonial(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Biologic(x))\nSerflike(rory) -> Stupefying(rory)\nBiologic(rory) and Unsanitary(rory) -> Uniovulate(rory)\n\nStroppy(rory)\n\nStroppy(rory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Tanny is addled. Sandra is supplicant. August is analgesic. If Tanny is addled then Tanny is motor. If August is motor and August is analgesic then August is addled. If someone is motor then they are analgesic. Young people are auriculate. If Sandra is overjoyed then Sandra is supplicant. If Sandra is auriculate and Sandra is sneezy then Sandra is motor. August is not supplicant.", "logic": "\nAddled(tanny)\nSupplicant(sandra)\nAnalgesic(august)\nAddled(tanny) -> Motor(tanny)\nMotor(august) and Analgesic(august) -> Addled(august)\nforall x (Motor(x) -> Analgesic(x))\nforall x (Analgesic(x) -> Auriculate(x))\nOverjoyed(sandra) -> Supplicant(sandra)\nAuriculate(sandra) and Sneezy(sandra) -> Motor(sandra)\n\nnot Supplicant(august)\n\nnot Supplicant(august) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Ely is definitive. Carine is cognate. Hari is hooked. If Ely is definitive then Ely is aliform. If Hari is aliform and Hari is hooked then Hari is definitive. If someone is aliform then they are hooked. Young people are estuarial. If Carine is cognate then Carine is cognate. If Carine is estuarial and Carine is panoptical then Carine is aliform. Carine is cognate.", "logic": "\nDefinitive(ely)\nCognate(carine)\nHooked(hari)\nDefinitive(ely) -> Aliform(ely)\nAliform(hari) and Hooked(hari) -> Definitive(hari)\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) -> Estuarial(x))\nCognate(carine) -> Cognate(carine)\nEstuarial(carine) and Panoptical(carine) -> Aliform(carine)\n\nCognate(carine)\n\nCognate(carine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "The idell is unintended. The roanne queen the celina. The celina is acrid. If something is unintended then it stink the celina. If something stink the idell and the idell is abusive then it codify the roanne. If the idell stink the celina then the celina is unintended. The roanne queen the celina.", "logic": "\nUnintended(idell)\nQueen(roanne, celina)\nAcrid(celina)\nforall x (Unintended(x) -> Stink(x, celina))\nforall x (Stink(x, idell) and Abusive(idell) -> Codify(x, roanne))\nStink(idell, celina) -> Unintended(celina)\n\nQueen(roanne, celina)\n\ntherefore Queen(roanne, celina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The jabez is hagridden. The marten segue the vito. The vito is waxlike. If something is hagridden then it reap the vito. If something reap the jabez and the jabez is iambic then it asseverate the marten. If the jabez reap the vito then the vito is hagridden. The jabez is not hagridden.", "logic": "\nHagridden(jabez)\nSegue(marten, vito)\nWaxlike(vito)\nforall x (Hagridden(x) -> Reap(x, vito))\nforall x (Reap(x, jabez) and Iambic(jabez) -> Asseverate(x, marten))\nReap(jabez, vito) -> Hagridden(vito)\n\nnot Hagridden(jabez)\n\ntherefore Hagridden(jabez)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The harmon is advancing. The roselle arch the sunshine. The sunshine is auditive. If something is advancing then it relax the sunshine. If something relax the harmon and the harmon is gossamer then it diddle the roselle. If the harmon relax the sunshine then the sunshine is advancing. The harmon relax the sunshine.", "logic": "\nAdvancing(harmon)\nArch(roselle, sunshine)\nAuditive(sunshine)\nforall x (Advancing(x) -> Relax(x, sunshine))\nforall x (Relax(x, harmon) and Gossamer(harmon) -> Diddle(x, roselle))\nRelax(harmon, sunshine) -> Advancing(sunshine)\n\nRelax(harmon, sunshine)\n\nAdvancing(harmon) and forall x (Advancing(x) -> Relax(x, sunshine)) -> therefore Relax(harmon, sunshine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The georgiana is tagged. The piggy reshuffle the vannie. The vannie is bluish. If something is tagged then it deaminize the vannie. If something deaminize the georgiana and the georgiana is unproved then it outrange the piggy. If the georgiana deaminize the vannie then the vannie is tagged. The georgiana does not need the vannie.", "logic": "\nTagged(georgiana)\nReshuffle(piggy, vannie)\nBluish(vannie)\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Deaminize(x, vannie))\nforall x (Deaminize(x, georgiana) and Unproved(georgiana) -> Outrange(x, piggy))\nDeaminize(georgiana, vannie) -> Tagged(vannie)\n\nnot Deaminize(georgiana, vannie)\n\nTagged(georgiana) and forall x (Tagged(x) -> Deaminize(x, vannie)) -> therefore Deaminize(georgiana, vannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The renado is utterable. The loraine upgrade the daune. The daune is jewish. If something is utterable then it glitter the daune. If something glitter the renado and the renado is piebald then it cabin the loraine. If the renado glitter the daune then the daune is utterable. The daune is utterable.", "logic": "\nUtterable(renado)\nUpgrade(loraine, daune)\nJewish(daune)\nforall x (Utterable(x) -> Glitter(x, daune))\nforall x (Glitter(x, renado) and Piebald(renado) -> Cabin(x, loraine))\nGlitter(renado, daune) -> Utterable(daune)\n\nUtterable(daune)\n\nUtterable(renado) and forall x (Utterable(x) -> Glitter(x, daune)) -> therefore Glitter(renado, daune) Glitter(renado, daune) and Glitter(renado, daune) -> Utterable(daune) -> therefore Utterable(daune)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The paola is centroidal. The patel sprout the terrye. The terrye is flint. If something is centroidal then it misprint the terrye. If something misprint the paola and the paola is eviscerate then it preclude the patel. If the paola misprint the terrye then the terrye is centroidal. The terrye is not centroidal.", "logic": "\nCentroidal(paola)\nSprout(patel, terrye)\nFlint(terrye)\nforall x (Centroidal(x) -> Misprint(x, terrye))\nforall x (Misprint(x, paola) and Eviscerate(paola) -> Preclude(x, patel))\nMisprint(paola, terrye) -> Centroidal(terrye)\n\nnot Centroidal(terrye)\n\nCentroidal(paola) and forall x (Centroidal(x) -> Misprint(x, terrye)) -> therefore Misprint(paola, terrye) Misprint(paola, terrye) and Misprint(paola, terrye) -> Centroidal(terrye) -> therefore Centroidal(terrye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The staci is chassidic. The natale curtain the eugene. The eugene is chalybeate. If something is chassidic then it zero the eugene. If something zero the staci and the staci is undesigned then it split the natale. If the staci zero the eugene then the eugene is chassidic. The eugene zero the eugene.", "logic": "\nChassidic(staci)\nCurtain(natale, eugene)\nChalybeate(eugene)\nforall x (Chassidic(x) -> Zero(x, eugene))\nforall x (Zero(x, staci) and Undesigned(staci) -> Split(x, natale))\nZero(staci, eugene) -> Chassidic(eugene)\n\nZero(eugene, eugene)\n\nChassidic(staci) and forall x (Chassidic(x) -> Zero(x, eugene)) -> therefore Zero(staci, eugene) Zero(staci, eugene) and Zero(staci, eugene) -> Chassidic(eugene) -> therefore Chassidic(eugene) Chassidic(eugene) and forall x (Chassidic(x) -> Zero(x, eugene)) -> therefore Zero(eugene, eugene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The camella is diarrhoeic. The charlott service the adrianne. The adrianne is costly. If something is diarrhoeic then it pink the adrianne. If something pink the camella and the camella is concurring then it single the charlott. If the camella pink the adrianne then the adrianne is diarrhoeic. The adrianne does not need the adrianne.", "logic": "\nDiarrhoeic(camella)\nService(charlott, adrianne)\nCostly(adrianne)\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) -> Pink(x, adrianne))\nforall x (Pink(x, camella) and Concurring(camella) -> Single(x, charlott))\nPink(camella, adrianne) -> Diarrhoeic(adrianne)\n\nnot Pink(adrianne, adrianne)\n\nDiarrhoeic(camella) and forall x (Diarrhoeic(x) -> Pink(x, adrianne)) -> therefore Pink(camella, adrianne) Pink(camella, adrianne) and Pink(camella, adrianne) -> Diarrhoeic(adrianne) -> therefore Diarrhoeic(adrianne) Diarrhoeic(adrianne) and forall x (Diarrhoeic(x) -> Pink(x, adrianne)) -> therefore Pink(adrianne, adrianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The shoshana is puberulent. The joycelin dial the reinhold. The reinhold is prototypic. If something is puberulent then it capsulise the reinhold. If something capsulise the shoshana and the shoshana is attempted then it demo the joycelin. If the shoshana capsulise the reinhold then the reinhold is puberulent. The joycelin does not need the reinhold.", "logic": "\nPuberulent(shoshana)\nDial(joycelin, reinhold)\nPrototypic(reinhold)\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Capsulise(x, reinhold))\nforall x (Capsulise(x, shoshana) and Attempted(shoshana) -> Demo(x, joycelin))\nCapsulise(shoshana, reinhold) -> Puberulent(reinhold)\n\nnot Capsulise(joycelin, reinhold)\n\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Capsulise(x, reinhold)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The marita is campestral. The julieta niggle the lori. The lori is wintry. If something is campestral then it rent the lori. If something rent the marita and the marita is rainy then it overspread the julieta. If the marita rent the lori then the lori is campestral. The marita overspread the julieta.", "logic": "\nCampestral(marita)\nNiggle(julieta, lori)\nWintry(lori)\nforall x (Campestral(x) -> Rent(x, lori))\nforall x (Rent(x, marita) and Rainy(marita) -> Overspread(x, julieta))\nRent(marita, lori) -> Campestral(lori)\n\nOverspread(marita, julieta)\n\nforall x (Rent(x, marita) and Rainy(marita) -> Overspread(x, julieta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The tabbi is kindred. The odetta accede the edna. The edna is mealy. If something is kindred then it extricate the edna. If something extricate the tabbi and the tabbi is carpeted then it bestialize the odetta. If the tabbi extricate the edna then the edna is kindred. The edna does not like the odetta.", "logic": "\nKindred(tabbi)\nAccede(odetta, edna)\nMealy(edna)\nforall x (Kindred(x) -> Extricate(x, edna))\nforall x (Extricate(x, tabbi) and Carpeted(tabbi) -> Bestialize(x, odetta))\nExtricate(tabbi, edna) -> Kindred(edna)\n\nnot Bestialize(edna, odetta)\n\nforall x (Extricate(x, tabbi) and Carpeted(tabbi) -> Bestialize(x, odetta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The magnus is trussed. The parrnell fail the fayre. The fayre is cimmerian. If something is trussed then it sallow the fayre. If something sallow the magnus and the magnus is errhine then it broker the parrnell. If the magnus sallow the fayre then the fayre is trussed. The parrnell broker the parrnell.", "logic": "\nTrussed(magnus)\nFail(parrnell, fayre)\nCimmerian(fayre)\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Sallow(x, fayre))\nforall x (Sallow(x, magnus) and Errhine(magnus) -> Broker(x, parrnell))\nSallow(magnus, fayre) -> Trussed(fayre)\n\nBroker(parrnell, parrnell)\n\nforall x (Sallow(x, magnus) and Errhine(magnus) -> Broker(x, parrnell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The elizabet is hogged. The oralla devaluate the tod. The tod is soprano. If something is hogged then it thoriate the tod. If something thoriate the elizabet and the elizabet is abominable then it patrol the oralla. If the elizabet thoriate the tod then the tod is hogged. The oralla is not soprano.", "logic": "\nHogged(elizabet)\nDevaluate(oralla, tod)\nSoprano(tod)\nforall x (Hogged(x) -> Thoriate(x, tod))\nforall x (Thoriate(x, elizabet) and Abominable(elizabet) -> Patrol(x, oralla))\nThoriate(elizabet, tod) -> Hogged(tod)\n\nnot Soprano(oralla)\n\nnot Soprano(oralla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The garp is audacious. The letti feign the letitia. The letitia is katharobic. If something is audacious then it rectify the letitia. If something rectify the garp and the garp is past then it bowdlerize the letti. If the garp rectify the letitia then the letitia is audacious. The letitia is cold.", "logic": "\nAudacious(garp)\nFeign(letti, letitia)\nKatharobic(letitia)\nforall x (Audacious(x) -> Rectify(x, letitia))\nforall x (Rectify(x, garp) and Past(garp) -> Bowdlerize(x, letti))\nRectify(garp, letitia) -> Audacious(letitia)\n\nCold(letitia)\n\nCold(letitia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The mattheus is adjustive. The minerva disesteem the cathleen. The cathleen is pupillary. If something is adjustive then it refine the cathleen. If something refine the mattheus and the mattheus is straggly then it daub the minerva. If the mattheus refine the cathleen then the cathleen is adjustive. The cathleen does not need the mattheus.", "logic": "\nAdjustive(mattheus)\nDisesteem(minerva, cathleen)\nPupillary(cathleen)\nforall x (Adjustive(x) -> Refine(x, cathleen))\nforall x (Refine(x, mattheus) and Straggly(mattheus) -> Daub(x, minerva))\nRefine(mattheus, cathleen) -> Adjustive(cathleen)\n\nnot Refine(cathleen, mattheus)\n\nnot Refine(cathleen, mattheus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The jens is cloudy. The cassey disgruntle the melicent. The melicent is ecdemic. If something is cloudy then it destine the melicent. If something destine the jens and the jens is piano then it splat the cassey. If the jens destine the melicent then the melicent is cloudy. The cassey is cloudy.", "logic": "\nCloudy(jens)\nDisgruntle(cassey, melicent)\nEcdemic(melicent)\nforall x (Cloudy(x) -> Destine(x, melicent))\nforall x (Destine(x, jens) and Piano(jens) -> Splat(x, cassey))\nDestine(jens, melicent) -> Cloudy(melicent)\n\nCloudy(cassey)\n\nCloudy(cassey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Aristotle is evitable. Aristotle is tuxedoed. Ferdie is varied. Ferdie is evitable. Ferdie is adored. Ferdie is tuxedoed. Ferdie is jungian. Terra is incorrupt. Terra is evitable. Terra is adored. Terra is jungian. Hilarie is evitable. Hilarie is adored. Hilarie is cropped. Hilarie is tuxedoed. Hilarie is jungian. All jungian people are cropped. All evitable people are incorrupt. All adored, evitable people are jungian. All incorrupt people are adored. If Ferdie is evitable and Ferdie is not jungian then Ferdie is varied. If Ferdie is not cropped and Ferdie is not jungian then Ferdie is not tuxedoed. Ferdie is jungian.", "logic": "\nEvitable(aristotle)\nTuxedoed(aristotle)\nVaried(ferdie)\nEvitable(ferdie)\nAdored(ferdie)\nTuxedoed(ferdie)\nJungian(ferdie)\nIncorrupt(terra)\nEvitable(terra)\nAdored(terra)\nJungian(terra)\nEvitable(hilarie)\nAdored(hilarie)\nCropped(hilarie)\nTuxedoed(hilarie)\nJungian(hilarie)\nforall x (Jungian(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Evitable(x) -> Incorrupt(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Evitable(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Adored(x))\nEvitable(ferdie) and not Jungian(ferdie) -> Varied(ferdie)\nnot Cropped(ferdie) and not Jungian(ferdie) -> not Tuxedoed(ferdie)\n\nJungian(ferdie)\n\ntherefore Jungian(ferdie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Melva is ambulatory. Melva is pellucid. Jewel is napoleonic. Jewel is ambulatory. Jewel is scalloped. Jewel is pellucid. Jewel is sheathed. Luigi is careless. Luigi is ambulatory. Luigi is scalloped. Luigi is sheathed. Rosalie is ambulatory. Rosalie is scalloped. Rosalie is succeeding. Rosalie is pellucid. Rosalie is sheathed. All sheathed people are succeeding. All ambulatory people are careless. All scalloped, ambulatory people are sheathed. All careless people are scalloped. If Jewel is ambulatory and Jewel is not sheathed then Jewel is napoleonic. If Jewel is not succeeding and Jewel is not sheathed then Jewel is not pellucid. Luigi is not careless.", "logic": "\nAmbulatory(melva)\nPellucid(melva)\nNapoleonic(jewel)\nAmbulatory(jewel)\nScalloped(jewel)\nPellucid(jewel)\nSheathed(jewel)\nCareless(luigi)\nAmbulatory(luigi)\nScalloped(luigi)\nSheathed(luigi)\nAmbulatory(rosalie)\nScalloped(rosalie)\nSucceeding(rosalie)\nPellucid(rosalie)\nSheathed(rosalie)\nforall x (Sheathed(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Ambulatory(x) -> Careless(x))\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Ambulatory(x) -> Sheathed(x))\nforall x (Careless(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nAmbulatory(jewel) and not Sheathed(jewel) -> Napoleonic(jewel)\nnot Succeeding(jewel) and not Sheathed(jewel) -> not Pellucid(jewel)\n\nnot Careless(luigi)\n\ntherefore Careless(luigi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Thorndike is impartial. Thorndike is convinced. Lil is achromic. Lil is impartial. Lil is cannular. Lil is convinced. Lil is darkening. Loreen is coronary. Loreen is impartial. Loreen is cannular. Loreen is darkening. Elonore is impartial. Elonore is cannular. Elonore is cosmetic. Elonore is convinced. Elonore is darkening. All darkening people are cosmetic. All impartial people are coronary. All cannular, impartial people are darkening. All coronary people are cannular. If Lil is impartial and Lil is not darkening then Lil is achromic. If Lil is not cosmetic and Lil is not darkening then Lil is not convinced. Loreen is cosmetic.", "logic": "\nImpartial(thorndike)\nConvinced(thorndike)\nAchromic(lil)\nImpartial(lil)\nCannular(lil)\nConvinced(lil)\nDarkening(lil)\nCoronary(loreen)\nImpartial(loreen)\nCannular(loreen)\nDarkening(loreen)\nImpartial(elonore)\nCannular(elonore)\nCosmetic(elonore)\nConvinced(elonore)\nDarkening(elonore)\nforall x (Darkening(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Coronary(x))\nforall x (Cannular(x) and Impartial(x) -> Darkening(x))\nforall x (Coronary(x) -> Cannular(x))\nImpartial(lil) and not Darkening(lil) -> Achromic(lil)\nnot Cosmetic(lil) and not Darkening(lil) -> not Convinced(lil)\n\nCosmetic(loreen)\n\nDarkening(loreen) and forall x (Darkening(x) -> Cosmetic(x)) -> therefore Cosmetic(loreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Aurelie is evasive. Aurelie is uncurbed. Damaris is benignant. Damaris is evasive. Damaris is relieved. Damaris is uncurbed. Damaris is chorionic. Oswell is roiling. Oswell is evasive. Oswell is relieved. Oswell is chorionic. Aloisia is evasive. Aloisia is relieved. Aloisia is firstborn. Aloisia is uncurbed. Aloisia is chorionic. All chorionic people are firstborn. All evasive people are roiling. All relieved, evasive people are chorionic. All roiling people are relieved. If Damaris is evasive and Damaris is not chorionic then Damaris is benignant. If Damaris is not firstborn and Damaris is not chorionic then Damaris is not uncurbed. Oswell is not firstborn.", "logic": "\nEvasive(aurelie)\nUncurbed(aurelie)\nBenignant(damaris)\nEvasive(damaris)\nRelieved(damaris)\nUncurbed(damaris)\nChorionic(damaris)\nRoiling(oswell)\nEvasive(oswell)\nRelieved(oswell)\nChorionic(oswell)\nEvasive(aloisia)\nRelieved(aloisia)\nFirstborn(aloisia)\nUncurbed(aloisia)\nChorionic(aloisia)\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Firstborn(x))\nforall x (Evasive(x) -> Roiling(x))\nforall x (Relieved(x) and Evasive(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Roiling(x) -> Relieved(x))\nEvasive(damaris) and not Chorionic(damaris) -> Benignant(damaris)\nnot Firstborn(damaris) and not Chorionic(damaris) -> not Uncurbed(damaris)\n\nnot Firstborn(oswell)\n\nChorionic(oswell) and forall x (Chorionic(x) -> Firstborn(x)) -> therefore Firstborn(oswell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Flossy is unstirred. Flossy is groomed. Gwenny is diacritic. Gwenny is unstirred. Gwenny is gravelly. Gwenny is groomed. Gwenny is savoury. Annabela is raunchy. Annabela is unstirred. Annabela is gravelly. Annabela is savoury. Lynette is unstirred. Lynette is gravelly. Lynette is duncical. Lynette is groomed. Lynette is savoury. All savoury people are duncical. All unstirred people are raunchy. All gravelly, unstirred people are savoury. All raunchy people are gravelly. If Gwenny is unstirred and Gwenny is not savoury then Gwenny is diacritic. If Gwenny is not duncical and Gwenny is not savoury then Gwenny is not groomed. Flossy is gravelly.", "logic": "\nUnstirred(flossy)\nGroomed(flossy)\nDiacritic(gwenny)\nUnstirred(gwenny)\nGravelly(gwenny)\nGroomed(gwenny)\nSavoury(gwenny)\nRaunchy(annabela)\nUnstirred(annabela)\nGravelly(annabela)\nSavoury(annabela)\nUnstirred(lynette)\nGravelly(lynette)\nDuncical(lynette)\nGroomed(lynette)\nSavoury(lynette)\nforall x (Savoury(x) -> Duncical(x))\nforall x (Unstirred(x) -> Raunchy(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) and Unstirred(x) -> Savoury(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nUnstirred(gwenny) and not Savoury(gwenny) -> Diacritic(gwenny)\nnot Duncical(gwenny) and not Savoury(gwenny) -> not Groomed(gwenny)\n\nGravelly(flossy)\n\nUnstirred(flossy) and forall x (Unstirred(x) -> Raunchy(x)) -> therefore Raunchy(flossy) Raunchy(flossy) and forall x (Raunchy(x) -> Gravelly(x)) -> therefore Gravelly(flossy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Maxine is accepting. Maxine is ghanese. Derron is lobar. Derron is accepting. Derron is carious. Derron is ghanese. Derron is decorative. Bernita is outflowing. Bernita is accepting. Bernita is carious. Bernita is decorative. Thaddus is accepting. Thaddus is carious. Thaddus is biaxal. Thaddus is ghanese. Thaddus is decorative. All decorative people are biaxal. All accepting people are outflowing. All carious, accepting people are decorative. All outflowing people are carious. If Derron is accepting and Derron is not decorative then Derron is lobar. If Derron is not biaxal and Derron is not decorative then Derron is not ghanese. Maxine is not carious.", "logic": "\nAccepting(maxine)\nGhanese(maxine)\nLobar(derron)\nAccepting(derron)\nCarious(derron)\nGhanese(derron)\nDecorative(derron)\nOutflowing(bernita)\nAccepting(bernita)\nCarious(bernita)\nDecorative(bernita)\nAccepting(thaddus)\nCarious(thaddus)\nBiaxal(thaddus)\nGhanese(thaddus)\nDecorative(thaddus)\nforall x (Decorative(x) -> Biaxal(x))\nforall x (Accepting(x) -> Outflowing(x))\nforall x (Carious(x) and Accepting(x) -> Decorative(x))\nforall x (Outflowing(x) -> Carious(x))\nAccepting(derron) and not Decorative(derron) -> Lobar(derron)\nnot Biaxal(derron) and not Decorative(derron) -> not Ghanese(derron)\n\nnot Carious(maxine)\n\nAccepting(maxine) and forall x (Accepting(x) -> Outflowing(x)) -> therefore Outflowing(maxine) Outflowing(maxine) and forall x (Outflowing(x) -> Carious(x)) -> therefore Carious(maxine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Bellina is manichee. Bellina is logy. Euphemia is woollen. Euphemia is manichee. Euphemia is sepulchral. Euphemia is logy. Euphemia is uniformed. Stephanie is biface. Stephanie is manichee. Stephanie is sepulchral. Stephanie is uniformed. Patricia is manichee. Patricia is sepulchral. Patricia is accordant. Patricia is logy. Patricia is uniformed. All uniformed people are accordant. All manichee people are biface. All sepulchral, manichee people are uniformed. All biface people are sepulchral. If Euphemia is manichee and Euphemia is not uniformed then Euphemia is woollen. If Euphemia is not accordant and Euphemia is not uniformed then Euphemia is not logy. Bellina is uniformed.", "logic": "\nManichee(bellina)\nLogy(bellina)\nWoollen(euphemia)\nManichee(euphemia)\nSepulchral(euphemia)\nLogy(euphemia)\nUniformed(euphemia)\nBiface(stephanie)\nManichee(stephanie)\nSepulchral(stephanie)\nUniformed(stephanie)\nManichee(patricia)\nSepulchral(patricia)\nAccordant(patricia)\nLogy(patricia)\nUniformed(patricia)\nforall x (Uniformed(x) -> Accordant(x))\nforall x (Manichee(x) -> Biface(x))\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and Manichee(x) -> Uniformed(x))\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nManichee(euphemia) and not Uniformed(euphemia) -> Woollen(euphemia)\nnot Accordant(euphemia) and not Uniformed(euphemia) -> not Logy(euphemia)\n\nUniformed(bellina)\n\nManichee(bellina) and forall x (Manichee(x) -> Biface(x)) -> therefore Biface(bellina) Biface(bellina) and forall x (Biface(x) -> Sepulchral(x)) -> therefore Sepulchral(bellina) Sepulchral(bellina) and Manichee(bellina) and forall x (Sepulchral(x) and Manichee(x) -> Uniformed(x)) -> therefore Uniformed(bellina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Adria is unitarian. Adria is glomerular. Winny is popliteal. Winny is unitarian. Winny is lincolnian. Winny is glomerular. Winny is orangish. Elbertina is imbecilic. Elbertina is unitarian. Elbertina is lincolnian. Elbertina is orangish. Selena is unitarian. Selena is lincolnian. Selena is furled. Selena is glomerular. Selena is orangish. All orangish people are furled. All unitarian people are imbecilic. All lincolnian, unitarian people are orangish. All imbecilic people are lincolnian. If Winny is unitarian and Winny is not orangish then Winny is popliteal. If Winny is not furled and Winny is not orangish then Winny is not glomerular. Adria is not orangish.", "logic": "\nUnitarian(adria)\nGlomerular(adria)\nPopliteal(winny)\nUnitarian(winny)\nLincolnian(winny)\nGlomerular(winny)\nOrangish(winny)\nImbecilic(elbertina)\nUnitarian(elbertina)\nLincolnian(elbertina)\nOrangish(elbertina)\nUnitarian(selena)\nLincolnian(selena)\nFurled(selena)\nGlomerular(selena)\nOrangish(selena)\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Furled(x))\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) and Unitarian(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nUnitarian(winny) and not Orangish(winny) -> Popliteal(winny)\nnot Furled(winny) and not Orangish(winny) -> not Glomerular(winny)\n\nnot Orangish(adria)\n\nUnitarian(adria) and forall x (Unitarian(x) -> Imbecilic(x)) -> therefore Imbecilic(adria) Imbecilic(adria) and forall x (Imbecilic(x) -> Lincolnian(x)) -> therefore Lincolnian(adria) Lincolnian(adria) and Unitarian(adria) and forall x (Lincolnian(x) and Unitarian(x) -> Orangish(x)) -> therefore Orangish(adria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Bud is apolitical. Bud is shaky. Margalit is courtly. Margalit is apolitical. Margalit is pleasant. Margalit is shaky. Margalit is uncrowded. Karine is mown. Karine is apolitical. Karine is pleasant. Karine is uncrowded. Mitchel is apolitical. Mitchel is pleasant. Mitchel is periodic. Mitchel is shaky. Mitchel is uncrowded. All uncrowded people are periodic. All apolitical people are mown. All pleasant, apolitical people are uncrowded. All mown people are pleasant. If Margalit is apolitical and Margalit is not uncrowded then Margalit is courtly. If Margalit is not periodic and Margalit is not uncrowded then Margalit is not shaky. Bud is not courtly.", "logic": "\nApolitical(bud)\nShaky(bud)\nCourtly(margalit)\nApolitical(margalit)\nPleasant(margalit)\nShaky(margalit)\nUncrowded(margalit)\nMown(karine)\nApolitical(karine)\nPleasant(karine)\nUncrowded(karine)\nApolitical(mitchel)\nPleasant(mitchel)\nPeriodic(mitchel)\nShaky(mitchel)\nUncrowded(mitchel)\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Periodic(x))\nforall x (Apolitical(x) -> Mown(x))\nforall x (Pleasant(x) and Apolitical(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\nforall x (Mown(x) -> Pleasant(x))\nApolitical(margalit) and not Uncrowded(margalit) -> Courtly(margalit)\nnot Periodic(margalit) and not Uncrowded(margalit) -> not Shaky(margalit)\n\nnot Courtly(bud)\n\nnot Courtly(bud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Annamari is twee. Annamari is laryngeal. Tiphanie is dilatory. Tiphanie is twee. Tiphanie is unordered. Tiphanie is laryngeal. Tiphanie is twisted. Vernice is loquacious. Vernice is twee. Vernice is unordered. Vernice is twisted. Temple is twee. Temple is unordered. Temple is appointed. Temple is laryngeal. Temple is twisted. All twisted people are appointed. All twee people are loquacious. All unordered, twee people are twisted. All loquacious people are unordered. If Tiphanie is twee and Tiphanie is not twisted then Tiphanie is dilatory. If Tiphanie is not appointed and Tiphanie is not twisted then Tiphanie is not laryngeal. Vernice is laryngeal.", "logic": "\nTwee(annamari)\nLaryngeal(annamari)\nDilatory(tiphanie)\nTwee(tiphanie)\nUnordered(tiphanie)\nLaryngeal(tiphanie)\nTwisted(tiphanie)\nLoquacious(vernice)\nTwee(vernice)\nUnordered(vernice)\nTwisted(vernice)\nTwee(temple)\nUnordered(temple)\nAppointed(temple)\nLaryngeal(temple)\nTwisted(temple)\nforall x (Twisted(x) -> Appointed(x))\nforall x (Twee(x) -> Loquacious(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) and Twee(x) -> Twisted(x))\nforall x (Loquacious(x) -> Unordered(x))\nTwee(tiphanie) and not Twisted(tiphanie) -> Dilatory(tiphanie)\nnot Appointed(tiphanie) and not Twisted(tiphanie) -> not Laryngeal(tiphanie)\n\nLaryngeal(vernice)\n\nLaryngeal(vernice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Nicky is remorseful. Nicky is risible. Alejandro is autistic. Alejandro is remorseful. Alejandro is unsheathed. Alejandro is risible. Alejandro is gibbous. Modesty is abstract. Modesty is remorseful. Modesty is unsheathed. Modesty is gibbous. Moyra is remorseful. Moyra is unsheathed. Moyra is strapless. Moyra is risible. Moyra is gibbous. All gibbous people are strapless. All remorseful people are abstract. All unsheathed, remorseful people are gibbous. All abstract people are unsheathed. If Alejandro is remorseful and Alejandro is not gibbous then Alejandro is autistic. If Alejandro is not strapless and Alejandro is not gibbous then Alejandro is not risible. Moyra is not autistic.", "logic": "\nRemorseful(nicky)\nRisible(nicky)\nAutistic(alejandro)\nRemorseful(alejandro)\nUnsheathed(alejandro)\nRisible(alejandro)\nGibbous(alejandro)\nAbstract(modesty)\nRemorseful(modesty)\nUnsheathed(modesty)\nGibbous(modesty)\nRemorseful(moyra)\nUnsheathed(moyra)\nStrapless(moyra)\nRisible(moyra)\nGibbous(moyra)\nforall x (Gibbous(x) -> Strapless(x))\nforall x (Remorseful(x) -> Abstract(x))\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) and Remorseful(x) -> Gibbous(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Unsheathed(x))\nRemorseful(alejandro) and not Gibbous(alejandro) -> Autistic(alejandro)\nnot Strapless(alejandro) and not Gibbous(alejandro) -> not Risible(alejandro)\n\nnot Autistic(moyra)\n\nnot Autistic(moyra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Halli is koranic. Halli is tailored. Caterina is negotiable. Caterina is koranic. Caterina is sunbaked. Caterina is tailored. Caterina is superb. Annmarie is furious. Annmarie is koranic. Annmarie is sunbaked. Annmarie is superb. Josselyn is koranic. Josselyn is sunbaked. Josselyn is apivorous. Josselyn is tailored. Josselyn is superb. All superb people are apivorous. All koranic people are furious. All sunbaked, koranic people are superb. All furious people are sunbaked. If Caterina is koranic and Caterina is not superb then Caterina is negotiable. If Caterina is not apivorous and Caterina is not superb then Caterina is not tailored. Annmarie is negotiable.", "logic": "\nKoranic(halli)\nTailored(halli)\nNegotiable(caterina)\nKoranic(caterina)\nSunbaked(caterina)\nTailored(caterina)\nSuperb(caterina)\nFurious(annmarie)\nKoranic(annmarie)\nSunbaked(annmarie)\nSuperb(annmarie)\nKoranic(josselyn)\nSunbaked(josselyn)\nApivorous(josselyn)\nTailored(josselyn)\nSuperb(josselyn)\nforall x (Superb(x) -> Apivorous(x))\nforall x (Koranic(x) -> Furious(x))\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) and Koranic(x) -> Superb(x))\nforall x (Furious(x) -> Sunbaked(x))\nKoranic(caterina) and not Superb(caterina) -> Negotiable(caterina)\nnot Apivorous(caterina) and not Superb(caterina) -> not Tailored(caterina)\n\nNegotiable(annmarie)\n\nNegotiable(annmarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Skelly is neighborly. Skelly is composed. Skelly is disturbed. Dorie is patristic. Dorie is shaggy. Dorie is not counter. Dorie is not disturbed. Quiet people are not counter. Young people are composed. All composed people are stellate. If Dorie is disturbed then Dorie is patristic. If Dorie is composed and Dorie is not neighborly then Dorie is counter. If someone is counter and stellate then they are disturbed. If someone is stellate and not counter then they are shaggy. If someone is stellate and not counter then they are shaggy. Dorie is patristic.", "logic": "\nNeighborly(skelly)\nComposed(skelly)\nDisturbed(skelly)\nPatristic(dorie)\nShaggy(dorie)\nnot Counter(dorie)\nnot Disturbed(dorie)\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> not Counter(x))\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Composed(x))\nforall x (Composed(x) -> Stellate(x))\nDisturbed(dorie) -> Patristic(dorie)\nComposed(dorie) and not Neighborly(dorie) -> Counter(dorie)\nforall x (Counter(x) and Stellate(x) -> Disturbed(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) and not Counter(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) and not Counter(x) -> Shaggy(x))\n\nPatristic(dorie)\n\ntherefore Patristic(dorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Rosene is ulcerative. Rosene is flowered. Rosene is doleful. Jeanelle is fusible. Jeanelle is edentate. Jeanelle is not rodlike. Jeanelle is not doleful. Quiet people are not rodlike. Young people are flowered. All flowered people are axenic. If Jeanelle is doleful then Jeanelle is fusible. If Jeanelle is flowered and Jeanelle is not ulcerative then Jeanelle is rodlike. If someone is rodlike and axenic then they are doleful. If someone is axenic and not rodlike then they are edentate. If someone is axenic and not rodlike then they are edentate. Jeanelle is doleful.", "logic": "\nUlcerative(rosene)\nFlowered(rosene)\nDoleful(rosene)\nFusible(jeanelle)\nEdentate(jeanelle)\nnot Rodlike(jeanelle)\nnot Doleful(jeanelle)\nforall x (Axenic(x) -> not Rodlike(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) -> Axenic(x))\nDoleful(jeanelle) -> Fusible(jeanelle)\nFlowered(jeanelle) and not Ulcerative(jeanelle) -> Rodlike(jeanelle)\nforall x (Rodlike(x) and Axenic(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) and not Rodlike(x) -> Edentate(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) and not Rodlike(x) -> Edentate(x))\n\nDoleful(jeanelle)\n\ntherefore not Doleful(jeanelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Selma is vocalic. Selma is august. Selma is spirituous. Aida is bestial. Aida is delirious. Aida is not cambial. Aida is not spirituous. Quiet people are not cambial. Young people are august. All august people are operculate. If Aida is spirituous then Aida is bestial. If Aida is august and Aida is not vocalic then Aida is cambial. If someone is cambial and operculate then they are spirituous. If someone is operculate and not cambial then they are delirious. If someone is operculate and not cambial then they are delirious. Selma is operculate.", "logic": "\nVocalic(selma)\nAugust(selma)\nSpirituous(selma)\nBestial(aida)\nDelirious(aida)\nnot Cambial(aida)\nnot Spirituous(aida)\nforall x (Operculate(x) -> not Cambial(x))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> August(x))\nforall x (August(x) -> Operculate(x))\nSpirituous(aida) -> Bestial(aida)\nAugust(aida) and not Vocalic(aida) -> Cambial(aida)\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Operculate(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) and not Cambial(x) -> Delirious(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) and not Cambial(x) -> Delirious(x))\n\nOperculate(selma)\n\nAugust(selma) and forall x (August(x) -> Operculate(x)) -> therefore Operculate(selma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Daveen is ideologic. Daveen is haematic. Daveen is inutile. Ophelia is cuspidate. Ophelia is blustery. Ophelia is not bogartian. Ophelia is not inutile. Quiet people are not bogartian. Young people are haematic. All haematic people are frictional. If Ophelia is inutile then Ophelia is cuspidate. If Ophelia is haematic and Ophelia is not ideologic then Ophelia is bogartian. If someone is bogartian and frictional then they are inutile. If someone is frictional and not bogartian then they are blustery. If someone is frictional and not bogartian then they are blustery. Daveen is not frictional.", "logic": "\nIdeologic(daveen)\nHaematic(daveen)\nInutile(daveen)\nCuspidate(ophelia)\nBlustery(ophelia)\nnot Bogartian(ophelia)\nnot Inutile(ophelia)\nforall x (Frictional(x) -> not Bogartian(x))\nforall x (Inutile(x) -> Haematic(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) -> Frictional(x))\nInutile(ophelia) -> Cuspidate(ophelia)\nHaematic(ophelia) and not Ideologic(ophelia) -> Bogartian(ophelia)\nforall x (Bogartian(x) and Frictional(x) -> Inutile(x))\nforall x (Frictional(x) and not Bogartian(x) -> Blustery(x))\nforall x (Frictional(x) and not Bogartian(x) -> Blustery(x))\n\nnot Frictional(daveen)\n\nHaematic(daveen) and forall x (Haematic(x) -> Frictional(x)) -> therefore Frictional(daveen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Erick is xxiii. Erick is basilar. Erick is attic. Hillel is evaporable. Hillel is soughing. Hillel is not meritable. Hillel is not attic. Quiet people are not meritable. Young people are basilar. All basilar people are rainproof. If Hillel is attic then Hillel is evaporable. If Hillel is basilar and Hillel is not xxiii then Hillel is meritable. If someone is meritable and rainproof then they are attic. If someone is rainproof and not meritable then they are soughing. If someone is rainproof and not meritable then they are soughing. Erick is not meritable.", "logic": "\nXxiii(erick)\nBasilar(erick)\nAttic(erick)\nEvaporable(hillel)\nSoughing(hillel)\nnot Meritable(hillel)\nnot Attic(hillel)\nforall x (Rainproof(x) -> not Meritable(x))\nforall x (Attic(x) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Basilar(x) -> Rainproof(x))\nAttic(hillel) -> Evaporable(hillel)\nBasilar(hillel) and not Xxiii(hillel) -> Meritable(hillel)\nforall x (Meritable(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Attic(x))\nforall x (Rainproof(x) and not Meritable(x) -> Soughing(x))\nforall x (Rainproof(x) and not Meritable(x) -> Soughing(x))\n\nnot Meritable(erick)\n\nBasilar(erick) and forall x (Basilar(x) -> Rainproof(x)) -> therefore Rainproof(erick) Rainproof(erick) and forall x (Rainproof(x) -> not Meritable(x)) -> therefore not Meritable(erick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Alberto is unflawed. Alberto is mesozoic. Alberto is squab. Annalise is acanthous. Annalise is igneous. Annalise is not dwindling. Annalise is not squab. Quiet people are not dwindling. Young people are mesozoic. All mesozoic people are unanimated. If Annalise is squab then Annalise is acanthous. If Annalise is mesozoic and Annalise is not unflawed then Annalise is dwindling. If someone is dwindling and unanimated then they are squab. If someone is unanimated and not dwindling then they are igneous. If someone is unanimated and not dwindling then they are igneous. Alberto is dwindling.", "logic": "\nUnflawed(alberto)\nMesozoic(alberto)\nSquab(alberto)\nAcanthous(annalise)\nIgneous(annalise)\nnot Dwindling(annalise)\nnot Squab(annalise)\nforall x (Unanimated(x) -> not Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Unanimated(x))\nSquab(annalise) -> Acanthous(annalise)\nMesozoic(annalise) and not Unflawed(annalise) -> Dwindling(annalise)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Unanimated(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and not Dwindling(x) -> Igneous(x))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and not Dwindling(x) -> Igneous(x))\n\nDwindling(alberto)\n\nMesozoic(alberto) and forall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Unanimated(x)) -> therefore Unanimated(alberto) Unanimated(alberto) and forall x (Unanimated(x) -> not Dwindling(x)) -> therefore not Dwindling(alberto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Karia is smothering. Karia is anuric. Karia is vigilant. Guillaume is burrlike. Guillaume is soiled. Guillaume is not premature. Guillaume is not vigilant. Quiet people are not premature. Young people are anuric. All anuric people are mullioned. If Guillaume is vigilant then Guillaume is burrlike. If Guillaume is anuric and Guillaume is not smothering then Guillaume is premature. If someone is premature and mullioned then they are vigilant. If someone is mullioned and not premature then they are soiled. If someone is mullioned and not premature then they are soiled. Karia is soiled.", "logic": "\nSmothering(karia)\nAnuric(karia)\nVigilant(karia)\nBurrlike(guillaume)\nSoiled(guillaume)\nnot Premature(guillaume)\nnot Vigilant(guillaume)\nforall x (Mullioned(x) -> not Premature(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Mullioned(x))\nVigilant(guillaume) -> Burrlike(guillaume)\nAnuric(guillaume) and not Smothering(guillaume) -> Premature(guillaume)\nforall x (Premature(x) and Mullioned(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Mullioned(x) and not Premature(x) -> Soiled(x))\nforall x (Mullioned(x) and not Premature(x) -> Soiled(x))\n\nSoiled(karia)\n\nAnuric(karia) and forall x (Anuric(x) -> Mullioned(x)) -> therefore Mullioned(karia) Anuric(karia) and forall x (Anuric(x) -> Mullioned(x)) -> therefore Mullioned(karia) Mullioned(karia) and forall x (Mullioned(x) -> not Premature(x)) -> therefore not Premature(karia) Mullioned(karia) and not Premature(karia) and forall x (Mullioned(x) and not Premature(x) -> Soiled(x)) -> therefore Soiled(karia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Theada is avestan. Theada is impulsive. Theada is spindly. Reginald is palmlike. Reginald is teal. Reginald is not modernised. Reginald is not spindly. Quiet people are not modernised. Young people are impulsive. All impulsive people are minacious. If Reginald is spindly then Reginald is palmlike. If Reginald is impulsive and Reginald is not avestan then Reginald is modernised. If someone is modernised and minacious then they are spindly. If someone is minacious and not modernised then they are teal. If someone is minacious and not modernised then they are teal. Theada is not teal.", "logic": "\nAvestan(theada)\nImpulsive(theada)\nSpindly(theada)\nPalmlike(reginald)\nTeal(reginald)\nnot Modernised(reginald)\nnot Spindly(reginald)\nforall x (Minacious(x) -> not Modernised(x))\nforall x (Spindly(x) -> Impulsive(x))\nforall x (Impulsive(x) -> Minacious(x))\nSpindly(reginald) -> Palmlike(reginald)\nImpulsive(reginald) and not Avestan(reginald) -> Modernised(reginald)\nforall x (Modernised(x) and Minacious(x) -> Spindly(x))\nforall x (Minacious(x) and not Modernised(x) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Minacious(x) and not Modernised(x) -> Teal(x))\n\nnot Teal(theada)\n\nImpulsive(theada) and forall x (Impulsive(x) -> Minacious(x)) -> therefore Minacious(theada) Impulsive(theada) and forall x (Impulsive(x) -> Minacious(x)) -> therefore Minacious(theada) Minacious(theada) and forall x (Minacious(x) -> not Modernised(x)) -> therefore not Modernised(theada) Minacious(theada) and not Modernised(theada) and forall x (Minacious(x) and not Modernised(x) -> Teal(x)) -> therefore Teal(theada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Gui is genial. Gui is nonrandom. Gui is glutted. Jackelyn is tertiary. Jackelyn is rowdy. Jackelyn is not intensive. Jackelyn is not glutted. Quiet people are not intensive. Young people are nonrandom. All nonrandom people are advertent. If Jackelyn is glutted then Jackelyn is tertiary. If Jackelyn is nonrandom and Jackelyn is not genial then Jackelyn is intensive. If someone is intensive and advertent then they are glutted. If someone is advertent and not intensive then they are rowdy. If someone is advertent and not intensive then they are rowdy. Jackelyn is not nonrandom.", "logic": "\nGenial(gui)\nNonrandom(gui)\nGlutted(gui)\nTertiary(jackelyn)\nRowdy(jackelyn)\nnot Intensive(jackelyn)\nnot Glutted(jackelyn)\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> not Intensive(x))\nforall x (Glutted(x) -> Nonrandom(x))\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) -> Advertent(x))\nGlutted(jackelyn) -> Tertiary(jackelyn)\nNonrandom(jackelyn) and not Genial(jackelyn) -> Intensive(jackelyn)\nforall x (Intensive(x) and Advertent(x) -> Glutted(x))\nforall x (Advertent(x) and not Intensive(x) -> Rowdy(x))\nforall x (Advertent(x) and not Intensive(x) -> Rowdy(x))\n\nnot Nonrandom(jackelyn)\n\nforall x (Glutted(x) -> Nonrandom(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Rubie is literate. Rubie is vicious. Rubie is taped. Tadd is palatable. Tadd is nonionic. Tadd is not virginal. Tadd is not taped. Quiet people are not virginal. Young people are vicious. All vicious people are nephritic. If Tadd is taped then Tadd is palatable. If Tadd is vicious and Tadd is not literate then Tadd is virginal. If someone is virginal and nephritic then they are taped. If someone is nephritic and not virginal then they are nonionic. If someone is nephritic and not virginal then they are nonionic. Tadd is nephritic.", "logic": "\nLiterate(rubie)\nVicious(rubie)\nTaped(rubie)\nPalatable(tadd)\nNonionic(tadd)\nnot Virginal(tadd)\nnot Taped(tadd)\nforall x (Nephritic(x) -> not Virginal(x))\nforall x (Taped(x) -> Vicious(x))\nforall x (Vicious(x) -> Nephritic(x))\nTaped(tadd) -> Palatable(tadd)\nVicious(tadd) and not Literate(tadd) -> Virginal(tadd)\nforall x (Virginal(x) and Nephritic(x) -> Taped(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) and not Virginal(x) -> Nonionic(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) and not Virginal(x) -> Nonionic(x))\n\nNephritic(tadd)\n\nforall x (Vicious(x) -> Nephritic(x)) <- forall x (Taped(x) -> Vicious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Roanne is tumultuous. Roanne is ungodly. Roanne is argentic. Emmie is foolproof. Emmie is auric. Emmie is not preset. Emmie is not argentic. Quiet people are not preset. Young people are ungodly. All ungodly people are ambivalent. If Emmie is argentic then Emmie is foolproof. If Emmie is ungodly and Emmie is not tumultuous then Emmie is preset. If someone is preset and ambivalent then they are argentic. If someone is ambivalent and not preset then they are auric. If someone is ambivalent and not preset then they are auric. Emmie is not tumultuous.", "logic": "\nTumultuous(roanne)\nUngodly(roanne)\nArgentic(roanne)\nFoolproof(emmie)\nAuric(emmie)\nnot Preset(emmie)\nnot Argentic(emmie)\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> not Preset(x))\nforall x (Argentic(x) -> Ungodly(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> Ambivalent(x))\nArgentic(emmie) -> Foolproof(emmie)\nUngodly(emmie) and not Tumultuous(emmie) -> Preset(emmie)\nforall x (Preset(x) and Ambivalent(x) -> Argentic(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) and not Preset(x) -> Auric(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) and not Preset(x) -> Auric(x))\n\nnot Tumultuous(emmie)\n\nnot Tumultuous(emmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Lind is scripted. Lind is analyzed. Lind is unromantic. Anissa is intensive. Anissa is haired. Anissa is not toed. Anissa is not unromantic. Quiet people are not toed. Young people are analyzed. All analyzed people are contagious. If Anissa is unromantic then Anissa is intensive. If Anissa is analyzed and Anissa is not scripted then Anissa is toed. If someone is toed and contagious then they are unromantic. If someone is contagious and not toed then they are haired. If someone is contagious and not toed then they are haired. Lind is intensive.", "logic": "\nScripted(lind)\nAnalyzed(lind)\nUnromantic(lind)\nIntensive(anissa)\nHaired(anissa)\nnot Toed(anissa)\nnot Unromantic(anissa)\nforall x (Contagious(x) -> not Toed(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Analyzed(x))\nforall x (Analyzed(x) -> Contagious(x))\nUnromantic(anissa) -> Intensive(anissa)\nAnalyzed(anissa) and not Scripted(anissa) -> Toed(anissa)\nforall x (Toed(x) and Contagious(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Contagious(x) and not Toed(x) -> Haired(x))\nforall x (Contagious(x) and not Toed(x) -> Haired(x))\n\nIntensive(lind)\n\nIntensive(lind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Carlee is slivery. Carlee is ongoing. Carlee is not social. Carlee is figural. Husein is ongoing. Husein is figural. Hezekiah is aerial. If Husein is figural and Husein is slivery then Husein is social. If Carlee is ongoing and Carlee is aerial then Carlee is buttoned. If someone is aerial and slivery then they are ongoing. All aerial people are buttoned. If Husein is aerial and Husein is not figural then Husein is not buttoned. All buttoned people are slivery. Carlee is slivery.", "logic": "\nSlivery(carlee)\nOngoing(carlee)\nnot Social(carlee)\nFigural(carlee)\nOngoing(husein)\nFigural(husein)\nAerial(hezekiah)\nFigural(husein) and Slivery(husein) -> Social(husein)\nOngoing(carlee) and Aerial(carlee) -> Buttoned(carlee)\nforall x (Aerial(x) and Slivery(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Aerial(x) -> Buttoned(x))\nAerial(husein) and not Figural(husein) -> not Buttoned(husein)\nforall x (Buttoned(x) -> Slivery(x))\n\nSlivery(carlee)\n\ntherefore Slivery(carlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Tadeas is loud. Tadeas is eremitic. Tadeas is not severe. Tadeas is plumate. Fayre is eremitic. Fayre is plumate. Grier is extinct. If Fayre is plumate and Fayre is loud then Fayre is severe. If Tadeas is eremitic and Tadeas is extinct then Tadeas is impure. If someone is extinct and loud then they are eremitic. All extinct people are impure. If Fayre is extinct and Fayre is not plumate then Fayre is not impure. All impure people are loud. Fayre is not eremitic.", "logic": "\nLoud(tadeas)\nEremitic(tadeas)\nnot Severe(tadeas)\nPlumate(tadeas)\nEremitic(fayre)\nPlumate(fayre)\nExtinct(grier)\nPlumate(fayre) and Loud(fayre) -> Severe(fayre)\nEremitic(tadeas) and Extinct(tadeas) -> Impure(tadeas)\nforall x (Extinct(x) and Loud(x) -> Eremitic(x))\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Impure(x))\nExtinct(fayre) and not Plumate(fayre) -> not Impure(fayre)\nforall x (Impure(x) -> Loud(x))\n\nnot Eremitic(fayre)\n\ntherefore Eremitic(fayre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Bernetta is anhydrous. Bernetta is nighted. Bernetta is not myelinated. Bernetta is absolutist. Lila is nighted. Lila is absolutist. Hannis is lucifugous. If Lila is absolutist and Lila is anhydrous then Lila is myelinated. If Bernetta is nighted and Bernetta is lucifugous then Bernetta is rachitic. If someone is lucifugous and anhydrous then they are nighted. All lucifugous people are rachitic. If Lila is lucifugous and Lila is not absolutist then Lila is not rachitic. All rachitic people are anhydrous. Hannis is rachitic.", "logic": "\nAnhydrous(bernetta)\nNighted(bernetta)\nnot Myelinated(bernetta)\nAbsolutist(bernetta)\nNighted(lila)\nAbsolutist(lila)\nLucifugous(hannis)\nAbsolutist(lila) and Anhydrous(lila) -> Myelinated(lila)\nNighted(bernetta) and Lucifugous(bernetta) -> Rachitic(bernetta)\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) and Anhydrous(x) -> Nighted(x))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) -> Rachitic(x))\nLucifugous(lila) and not Absolutist(lila) -> not Rachitic(lila)\nforall x (Rachitic(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\n\nRachitic(hannis)\n\nLucifugous(hannis) and forall x (Lucifugous(x) -> Rachitic(x)) -> therefore Rachitic(hannis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Reese is taiwanese. Reese is rotatable. Reese is not cased. Reese is sizable. Englebert is rotatable. Englebert is sizable. Shirah is broadnosed. If Englebert is sizable and Englebert is taiwanese then Englebert is cased. If Reese is rotatable and Reese is broadnosed then Reese is humbling. If someone is broadnosed and taiwanese then they are rotatable. All broadnosed people are humbling. If Englebert is broadnosed and Englebert is not sizable then Englebert is not humbling. All humbling people are taiwanese. Shirah is not humbling.", "logic": "\nTaiwanese(reese)\nRotatable(reese)\nnot Cased(reese)\nSizable(reese)\nRotatable(englebert)\nSizable(englebert)\nBroadnosed(shirah)\nSizable(englebert) and Taiwanese(englebert) -> Cased(englebert)\nRotatable(reese) and Broadnosed(reese) -> Humbling(reese)\nforall x (Broadnosed(x) and Taiwanese(x) -> Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Broadnosed(x) -> Humbling(x))\nBroadnosed(englebert) and not Sizable(englebert) -> not Humbling(englebert)\nforall x (Humbling(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\n\nnot Humbling(shirah)\n\nBroadnosed(shirah) and forall x (Broadnosed(x) -> Humbling(x)) -> therefore Humbling(shirah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Nickolas is humanistic. Nickolas is scapular. Nickolas is not frowzy. Nickolas is uniformed. Maddy is scapular. Maddy is uniformed. Thorndike is neutered. If Maddy is uniformed and Maddy is humanistic then Maddy is frowzy. If Nickolas is scapular and Nickolas is neutered then Nickolas is brag. If someone is neutered and humanistic then they are scapular. All neutered people are brag. If Maddy is neutered and Maddy is not uniformed then Maddy is not brag. All brag people are humanistic. Thorndike is humanistic.", "logic": "\nHumanistic(nickolas)\nScapular(nickolas)\nnot Frowzy(nickolas)\nUniformed(nickolas)\nScapular(maddy)\nUniformed(maddy)\nNeutered(thorndike)\nUniformed(maddy) and Humanistic(maddy) -> Frowzy(maddy)\nScapular(nickolas) and Neutered(nickolas) -> Brag(nickolas)\nforall x (Neutered(x) and Humanistic(x) -> Scapular(x))\nforall x (Neutered(x) -> Brag(x))\nNeutered(maddy) and not Uniformed(maddy) -> not Brag(maddy)\nforall x (Brag(x) -> Humanistic(x))\n\nHumanistic(thorndike)\n\nNeutered(thorndike) and forall x (Neutered(x) -> Brag(x)) -> therefore Brag(thorndike) Brag(thorndike) and forall x (Brag(x) -> Humanistic(x)) -> therefore Humanistic(thorndike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Sandra is numeral. Sandra is uttered. Sandra is not acroscopic. Sandra is seventy. Dacey is uttered. Dacey is seventy. Hirsch is pilar. If Dacey is seventy and Dacey is numeral then Dacey is acroscopic. If Sandra is uttered and Sandra is pilar then Sandra is trichrome. If someone is pilar and numeral then they are uttered. All pilar people are trichrome. If Dacey is pilar and Dacey is not seventy then Dacey is not trichrome. All trichrome people are numeral. Hirsch is not numeral.", "logic": "\nNumeral(sandra)\nUttered(sandra)\nnot Acroscopic(sandra)\nSeventy(sandra)\nUttered(dacey)\nSeventy(dacey)\nPilar(hirsch)\nSeventy(dacey) and Numeral(dacey) -> Acroscopic(dacey)\nUttered(sandra) and Pilar(sandra) -> Trichrome(sandra)\nforall x (Pilar(x) and Numeral(x) -> Uttered(x))\nforall x (Pilar(x) -> Trichrome(x))\nPilar(dacey) and not Seventy(dacey) -> not Trichrome(dacey)\nforall x (Trichrome(x) -> Numeral(x))\n\nnot Numeral(hirsch)\n\nPilar(hirsch) and forall x (Pilar(x) -> Trichrome(x)) -> therefore Trichrome(hirsch) Trichrome(hirsch) and forall x (Trichrome(x) -> Numeral(x)) -> therefore Numeral(hirsch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Orelia is honorable. Orelia is unnerved. Orelia is not mental. Orelia is incan. Elizabet is unnerved. Elizabet is incan. Jud is calcic. If Elizabet is incan and Elizabet is honorable then Elizabet is mental. If Orelia is unnerved and Orelia is calcic then Orelia is carsick. If someone is calcic and honorable then they are unnerved. All calcic people are carsick. If Elizabet is calcic and Elizabet is not incan then Elizabet is not carsick. All carsick people are honorable. Jud is unnerved.", "logic": "\nHonorable(orelia)\nUnnerved(orelia)\nnot Mental(orelia)\nIncan(orelia)\nUnnerved(elizabet)\nIncan(elizabet)\nCalcic(jud)\nIncan(elizabet) and Honorable(elizabet) -> Mental(elizabet)\nUnnerved(orelia) and Calcic(orelia) -> Carsick(orelia)\nforall x (Calcic(x) and Honorable(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Calcic(x) -> Carsick(x))\nCalcic(elizabet) and not Incan(elizabet) -> not Carsick(elizabet)\nforall x (Carsick(x) -> Honorable(x))\n\nUnnerved(jud)\n\nCalcic(jud) and forall x (Calcic(x) -> Carsick(x)) -> therefore Carsick(jud) Carsick(jud) and forall x (Carsick(x) -> Honorable(x)) -> therefore Honorable(jud) Calcic(jud) and Honorable(jud) and forall x (Calcic(x) and Honorable(x) -> Unnerved(x)) -> therefore Unnerved(jud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Peta is eyelike. Peta is wanting. Peta is not purgative. Peta is frenzied. Thom is wanting. Thom is frenzied. Sybilla is tacit. If Thom is frenzied and Thom is eyelike then Thom is purgative. If Peta is wanting and Peta is tacit then Peta is minimalist. If someone is tacit and eyelike then they are wanting. All tacit people are minimalist. If Thom is tacit and Thom is not frenzied then Thom is not minimalist. All minimalist people are eyelike. Sybilla is not wanting.", "logic": "\nEyelike(peta)\nWanting(peta)\nnot Purgative(peta)\nFrenzied(peta)\nWanting(thom)\nFrenzied(thom)\nTacit(sybilla)\nFrenzied(thom) and Eyelike(thom) -> Purgative(thom)\nWanting(peta) and Tacit(peta) -> Minimalist(peta)\nforall x (Tacit(x) and Eyelike(x) -> Wanting(x))\nforall x (Tacit(x) -> Minimalist(x))\nTacit(thom) and not Frenzied(thom) -> not Minimalist(thom)\nforall x (Minimalist(x) -> Eyelike(x))\n\nnot Wanting(sybilla)\n\nTacit(sybilla) and forall x (Tacit(x) -> Minimalist(x)) -> therefore Minimalist(sybilla) Minimalist(sybilla) and forall x (Minimalist(x) -> Eyelike(x)) -> therefore Eyelike(sybilla) Tacit(sybilla) and Eyelike(sybilla) and forall x (Tacit(x) and Eyelike(x) -> Wanting(x)) -> therefore Wanting(sybilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Cary is nourished. Cary is vulnerable. Cary is not colorectal. Cary is bilateral. Pavia is vulnerable. Pavia is bilateral. Leeanne is perianal. If Pavia is bilateral and Pavia is nourished then Pavia is colorectal. If Cary is vulnerable and Cary is perianal then Cary is unendowed. If someone is perianal and nourished then they are vulnerable. All perianal people are unendowed. If Pavia is perianal and Pavia is not bilateral then Pavia is not unendowed. All unendowed people are nourished. Pavia is not unendowed.", "logic": "\nNourished(cary)\nVulnerable(cary)\nnot Colorectal(cary)\nBilateral(cary)\nVulnerable(pavia)\nBilateral(pavia)\nPerianal(leeanne)\nBilateral(pavia) and Nourished(pavia) -> Colorectal(pavia)\nVulnerable(cary) and Perianal(cary) -> Unendowed(cary)\nforall x (Perianal(x) and Nourished(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> Unendowed(x))\nPerianal(pavia) and not Bilateral(pavia) -> not Unendowed(pavia)\nforall x (Unendowed(x) -> Nourished(x))\n\nnot Unendowed(pavia)\n\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> Unendowed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Gwenni is gimbaled. Gwenni is unshapely. Gwenni is not unfed. Gwenni is stealthy. Idalina is unshapely. Idalina is stealthy. Doralynn is prejudiced. If Idalina is stealthy and Idalina is gimbaled then Idalina is unfed. If Gwenni is unshapely and Gwenni is prejudiced then Gwenni is torpid. If someone is prejudiced and gimbaled then they are unshapely. All prejudiced people are torpid. If Idalina is prejudiced and Idalina is not stealthy then Idalina is not torpid. All torpid people are gimbaled. Idalina is gimbaled.", "logic": "\nGimbaled(gwenni)\nUnshapely(gwenni)\nnot Unfed(gwenni)\nStealthy(gwenni)\nUnshapely(idalina)\nStealthy(idalina)\nPrejudiced(doralynn)\nStealthy(idalina) and Gimbaled(idalina) -> Unfed(idalina)\nUnshapely(gwenni) and Prejudiced(gwenni) -> Torpid(gwenni)\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) and Gimbaled(x) -> Unshapely(x))\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) -> Torpid(x))\nPrejudiced(idalina) and not Stealthy(idalina) -> not Torpid(idalina)\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\n\nGimbaled(idalina)\n\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Gimbaled(x)) <- forall x (Prejudiced(x) -> Torpid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Teena is tyrannical. Teena is corded. Teena is not booming. Teena is priestlike. Auria is corded. Auria is priestlike. Heinrich is futile. If Auria is priestlike and Auria is tyrannical then Auria is booming. If Teena is corded and Teena is futile then Teena is halting. If someone is futile and tyrannical then they are corded. All futile people are halting. If Auria is futile and Auria is not priestlike then Auria is not halting. All halting people are tyrannical. Auria is not booming.", "logic": "\nTyrannical(teena)\nCorded(teena)\nnot Booming(teena)\nPriestlike(teena)\nCorded(auria)\nPriestlike(auria)\nFutile(heinrich)\nPriestlike(auria) and Tyrannical(auria) -> Booming(auria)\nCorded(teena) and Futile(teena) -> Halting(teena)\nforall x (Futile(x) and Tyrannical(x) -> Corded(x))\nforall x (Futile(x) -> Halting(x))\nFutile(auria) and not Priestlike(auria) -> not Halting(auria)\nforall x (Halting(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\n\nnot Booming(auria)\n\nPriestlike(auria) and Tyrannical(auria) -> Booming(auria) <- forall x (Halting(x) -> Tyrannical(x)) <- forall x (Futile(x) -> Halting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Jobyna is choky. Jobyna is jeweled. Jobyna is not keynesian. Jobyna is tucked. Spencer is jeweled. Spencer is tucked. Roselyn is impulsive. If Spencer is tucked and Spencer is choky then Spencer is keynesian. If Jobyna is jeweled and Jobyna is impulsive then Jobyna is springlike. If someone is impulsive and choky then they are jeweled. All impulsive people are springlike. If Spencer is impulsive and Spencer is not tucked then Spencer is not springlike. All springlike people are choky. Jobyna is springlike.", "logic": "\nChoky(jobyna)\nJeweled(jobyna)\nnot Keynesian(jobyna)\nTucked(jobyna)\nJeweled(spencer)\nTucked(spencer)\nImpulsive(roselyn)\nTucked(spencer) and Choky(spencer) -> Keynesian(spencer)\nJeweled(jobyna) and Impulsive(jobyna) -> Springlike(jobyna)\nforall x (Impulsive(x) and Choky(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Impulsive(x) -> Springlike(x))\nImpulsive(spencer) and not Tucked(spencer) -> not Springlike(spencer)\nforall x (Springlike(x) -> Choky(x))\n\nSpringlike(jobyna)\n\nJeweled(jobyna) and Impulsive(jobyna) -> Springlike(jobyna) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Moises is cantering. Moises is belted. Moises is not featured. Moises is bimanual. Wilfrid is belted. Wilfrid is bimanual. Rourke is clathrate. If Wilfrid is bimanual and Wilfrid is cantering then Wilfrid is featured. If Moises is belted and Moises is clathrate then Moises is encyclical. If someone is clathrate and cantering then they are belted. All clathrate people are encyclical. If Wilfrid is clathrate and Wilfrid is not bimanual then Wilfrid is not encyclical. All encyclical people are cantering. Moises is not red.", "logic": "\nCantering(moises)\nBelted(moises)\nnot Featured(moises)\nBimanual(moises)\nBelted(wilfrid)\nBimanual(wilfrid)\nClathrate(rourke)\nBimanual(wilfrid) and Cantering(wilfrid) -> Featured(wilfrid)\nBelted(moises) and Clathrate(moises) -> Encyclical(moises)\nforall x (Clathrate(x) and Cantering(x) -> Belted(x))\nforall x (Clathrate(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nClathrate(wilfrid) and not Bimanual(wilfrid) -> not Encyclical(wilfrid)\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Cantering(x))\n\nnot Red(moises)\n\nnot Red(moises) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Karita is tearaway. Karita is animating. Karita is not pedestrian. Karita is thirtieth. Ruthann is animating. Ruthann is thirtieth. Alison is anhydrous. If Ruthann is thirtieth and Ruthann is tearaway then Ruthann is pedestrian. If Karita is animating and Karita is anhydrous then Karita is aboveboard. If someone is anhydrous and tearaway then they are animating. All anhydrous people are aboveboard. If Ruthann is anhydrous and Ruthann is not thirtieth then Ruthann is not aboveboard. All aboveboard people are tearaway. Alison is red.", "logic": "\nTearaway(karita)\nAnimating(karita)\nnot Pedestrian(karita)\nThirtieth(karita)\nAnimating(ruthann)\nThirtieth(ruthann)\nAnhydrous(alison)\nThirtieth(ruthann) and Tearaway(ruthann) -> Pedestrian(ruthann)\nAnimating(karita) and Anhydrous(karita) -> Aboveboard(karita)\nforall x (Anhydrous(x) and Tearaway(x) -> Animating(x))\nforall x (Anhydrous(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nAnhydrous(ruthann) and not Thirtieth(ruthann) -> not Aboveboard(ruthann)\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Tearaway(x))\n\nRed(alison)\n\nRed(alison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Essa is ohmic. Essa is unnamed. Essa is not immaterial. Essa is platelike. Ellene is unnamed. Ellene is platelike. Scotti is following. If Ellene is platelike and Ellene is ohmic then Ellene is immaterial. If Essa is unnamed and Essa is following then Essa is bootleg. If someone is following and ohmic then they are unnamed. All following people are bootleg. If Ellene is following and Ellene is not platelike then Ellene is not bootleg. All bootleg people are ohmic. Scotti is not immaterial.", "logic": "\nOhmic(essa)\nUnnamed(essa)\nnot Immaterial(essa)\nPlatelike(essa)\nUnnamed(ellene)\nPlatelike(ellene)\nFollowing(scotti)\nPlatelike(ellene) and Ohmic(ellene) -> Immaterial(ellene)\nUnnamed(essa) and Following(essa) -> Bootleg(essa)\nforall x (Following(x) and Ohmic(x) -> Unnamed(x))\nforall x (Following(x) -> Bootleg(x))\nFollowing(ellene) and not Platelike(ellene) -> not Bootleg(ellene)\nforall x (Bootleg(x) -> Ohmic(x))\n\nnot Immaterial(scotti)\n\nnot Immaterial(scotti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Bernice is renascent. Bernice is refractile. Bernice is not immature. Bernice is nightly. Chevalier is refractile. Chevalier is nightly. Kirbie is cupular. If Chevalier is nightly and Chevalier is renascent then Chevalier is immature. If Bernice is refractile and Bernice is cupular then Bernice is capacitive. If someone is cupular and renascent then they are refractile. All cupular people are capacitive. If Chevalier is cupular and Chevalier is not nightly then Chevalier is not capacitive. All capacitive people are renascent. Bernice is cupular.", "logic": "\nRenascent(bernice)\nRefractile(bernice)\nnot Immature(bernice)\nNightly(bernice)\nRefractile(chevalier)\nNightly(chevalier)\nCupular(kirbie)\nNightly(chevalier) and Renascent(chevalier) -> Immature(chevalier)\nRefractile(bernice) and Cupular(bernice) -> Capacitive(bernice)\nforall x (Cupular(x) and Renascent(x) -> Refractile(x))\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nCupular(chevalier) and not Nightly(chevalier) -> not Capacitive(chevalier)\nforall x (Capacitive(x) -> Renascent(x))\n\nCupular(bernice)\n\nCupular(bernice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Pincas is plenteous. Lissie is plenteous. Merril is saturnine. If something is dazzling then it is sardonic. All sardonic things are dazzling. If something is dazzling then it is solidified. All solidified, plenteous things are zealous. All saturnine things are dazzling. Green things are plenteous. If Lissie is racking and Lissie is saturnine then Lissie is zealous. If something is saturnine and solidified then it is dazzling. Merril is saturnine.", "logic": "\nPlenteous(pincas)\nPlenteous(lissie)\nSaturnine(merril)\nforall x (Dazzling(x) -> Sardonic(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Dazzling(x))\nforall x (Dazzling(x) -> Solidified(x))\nforall x (Solidified(x) and Plenteous(x) -> Zealous(x))\nforall x (Saturnine(x) -> Dazzling(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Plenteous(x))\nRacking(lissie) and Saturnine(lissie) -> Zealous(lissie)\nforall x (Saturnine(x) and Solidified(x) -> Dazzling(x))\n\nSaturnine(merril)\n\ntherefore Saturnine(merril)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Parry is amusive. Cristina is amusive. Noble is feline. If something is groping then it is unsounded. All unsounded things are groping. If something is groping then it is randomised. All randomised, amusive things are pharisaic. All feline things are groping. Green things are amusive. If Cristina is bonny and Cristina is feline then Cristina is pharisaic. If something is feline and randomised then it is groping. Noble is not feline.", "logic": "\nAmusive(parry)\nAmusive(cristina)\nFeline(noble)\nforall x (Groping(x) -> Unsounded(x))\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Groping(x))\nforall x (Groping(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) and Amusive(x) -> Pharisaic(x))\nforall x (Feline(x) -> Groping(x))\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Amusive(x))\nBonny(cristina) and Feline(cristina) -> Pharisaic(cristina)\nforall x (Feline(x) and Randomised(x) -> Groping(x))\n\nnot Feline(noble)\n\ntherefore Feline(noble)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Evangelin is necrotic. Kurt is necrotic. Raine is unshared. If something is incorrupt then it is staged. All staged things are incorrupt. If something is incorrupt then it is mastoidal. All mastoidal, necrotic things are avid. All unshared things are incorrupt. Green things are necrotic. If Kurt is masterless and Kurt is unshared then Kurt is avid. If something is unshared and mastoidal then it is incorrupt. Raine is incorrupt.", "logic": "\nNecrotic(evangelin)\nNecrotic(kurt)\nUnshared(raine)\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Staged(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) -> Incorrupt(x))\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Mastoidal(x))\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) and Necrotic(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Unshared(x) -> Incorrupt(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) -> Necrotic(x))\nMasterless(kurt) and Unshared(kurt) -> Avid(kurt)\nforall x (Unshared(x) and Mastoidal(x) -> Incorrupt(x))\n\nIncorrupt(raine)\n\nUnshared(raine) and forall x (Unshared(x) -> Incorrupt(x)) -> therefore Incorrupt(raine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Gregorio is unclear. Forbes is unclear. Vibhu is unhealthy. If something is slapdash then it is primaeval. All primaeval things are slapdash. If something is slapdash then it is sensible. All sensible, unclear things are amylaceous. All unhealthy things are slapdash. Green things are unclear. If Forbes is economical and Forbes is unhealthy then Forbes is amylaceous. If something is unhealthy and sensible then it is slapdash. Vibhu is not slapdash.", "logic": "\nUnclear(gregorio)\nUnclear(forbes)\nUnhealthy(vibhu)\nforall x (Slapdash(x) -> Primaeval(x))\nforall x (Primaeval(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Slapdash(x) -> Sensible(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) and Unclear(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Primaeval(x) -> Unclear(x))\nEconomical(forbes) and Unhealthy(forbes) -> Amylaceous(forbes)\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) and Sensible(x) -> Slapdash(x))\n\nnot Slapdash(vibhu)\n\nUnhealthy(vibhu) and forall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Slapdash(x)) -> therefore Slapdash(vibhu)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Norina is farfetched. Sim is farfetched. Bryana is metabolous. If something is notched then it is mutational. All mutational things are notched. If something is notched then it is branchiate. All branchiate, farfetched things are mesmerised. All metabolous things are notched. Green things are farfetched. If Sim is alveolate and Sim is metabolous then Sim is mesmerised. If something is metabolous and branchiate then it is notched. Bryana is branchiate.", "logic": "\nFarfetched(norina)\nFarfetched(sim)\nMetabolous(bryana)\nforall x (Notched(x) -> Mutational(x))\nforall x (Mutational(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Notched(x) -> Branchiate(x))\nforall x (Branchiate(x) and Farfetched(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\nforall x (Metabolous(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Mutational(x) -> Farfetched(x))\nAlveolate(sim) and Metabolous(sim) -> Mesmerised(sim)\nforall x (Metabolous(x) and Branchiate(x) -> Notched(x))\n\nBranchiate(bryana)\n\nMetabolous(bryana) and forall x (Metabolous(x) -> Notched(x)) -> therefore Notched(bryana) Notched(bryana) and forall x (Notched(x) -> Branchiate(x)) -> therefore Branchiate(bryana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Halli is anxiolytic. Betsy is anxiolytic. Marris is armillary. If something is luxuriant then it is realizable. All realizable things are luxuriant. If something is luxuriant then it is gripping. All gripping, anxiolytic things are intrepid. All armillary things are luxuriant. Green things are anxiolytic. If Betsy is pelecypod and Betsy is armillary then Betsy is intrepid. If something is armillary and gripping then it is luxuriant. Marris is not realizable.", "logic": "\nAnxiolytic(halli)\nAnxiolytic(betsy)\nArmillary(marris)\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Realizable(x))\nforall x (Realizable(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Gripping(x))\nforall x (Gripping(x) and Anxiolytic(x) -> Intrepid(x))\nforall x (Armillary(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Realizable(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nPelecypod(betsy) and Armillary(betsy) -> Intrepid(betsy)\nforall x (Armillary(x) and Gripping(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\n\nnot Realizable(marris)\n\nArmillary(marris) and forall x (Armillary(x) -> Luxuriant(x)) -> therefore Luxuriant(marris) Luxuriant(marris) and forall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Realizable(x)) -> therefore Realizable(marris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Odette is parthian. Malvina is parthian. Artie is fickle. If something is sweetened then it is wheeled. All wheeled things are sweetened. If something is sweetened then it is meaty. All meaty, parthian things are arresting. All fickle things are sweetened. Green things are parthian. If Malvina is septic and Malvina is fickle then Malvina is arresting. If something is fickle and meaty then it is sweetened. Artie is parthian.", "logic": "\nParthian(odette)\nParthian(malvina)\nFickle(artie)\nforall x (Sweetened(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nforall x (Sweetened(x) -> Meaty(x))\nforall x (Meaty(x) and Parthian(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Fickle(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Parthian(x))\nSeptic(malvina) and Fickle(malvina) -> Arresting(malvina)\nforall x (Fickle(x) and Meaty(x) -> Sweetened(x))\n\nParthian(artie)\n\nFickle(artie) and forall x (Fickle(x) -> Sweetened(x)) -> therefore Sweetened(artie) Sweetened(artie) and forall x (Sweetened(x) -> Wheeled(x)) -> therefore Wheeled(artie) Wheeled(artie) and forall x (Wheeled(x) -> Parthian(x)) -> therefore Parthian(artie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Laura is tongan. Hollie is tongan. Philippa is scurvy. If something is crested then it is millennian. All millennian things are crested. If something is crested then it is realized. All realized, tongan things are caulescent. All scurvy things are crested. Green things are tongan. If Hollie is impudent and Hollie is scurvy then Hollie is caulescent. If something is scurvy and realized then it is crested. Philippa is not tongan.", "logic": "\nTongan(laura)\nTongan(hollie)\nScurvy(philippa)\nforall x (Crested(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) -> Crested(x))\nforall x (Crested(x) -> Realized(x))\nforall x (Realized(x) and Tongan(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) -> Crested(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) -> Tongan(x))\nImpudent(hollie) and Scurvy(hollie) -> Caulescent(hollie)\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and Realized(x) -> Crested(x))\n\nnot Tongan(philippa)\n\nScurvy(philippa) and forall x (Scurvy(x) -> Crested(x)) -> therefore Crested(philippa) Crested(philippa) and forall x (Crested(x) -> Millennian(x)) -> therefore Millennian(philippa) Millennian(philippa) and forall x (Millennian(x) -> Tongan(x)) -> therefore Tongan(philippa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Alic is mandatory. Ilysa is mandatory. Keenan is paranasal. If something is shot then it is born. All born things are shot. If something is shot then it is organised. All organised, mandatory things are lviii. All paranasal things are shot. Green things are mandatory. If Ilysa is eponymous and Ilysa is paranasal then Ilysa is lviii. If something is paranasal and organised then it is shot. Ilysa is not lviii.", "logic": "\nMandatory(alic)\nMandatory(ilysa)\nParanasal(keenan)\nforall x (Shot(x) -> Born(x))\nforall x (Born(x) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (Shot(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Lviii(x))\nforall x (Paranasal(x) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (Born(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nEponymous(ilysa) and Paranasal(ilysa) -> Lviii(ilysa)\nforall x (Paranasal(x) and Organised(x) -> Shot(x))\n\nnot Lviii(ilysa)\n\nforall x (Organised(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Lviii(x)) <- forall x (Shot(x) -> Organised(x)) <- forall x (Born(x) -> Shot(x)) <- forall x (Shot(x) -> Born(x)) <- forall x (Paranasal(x) -> Shot(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Orton is burbling. Fulvia is burbling. Tailor is baptistic. If something is coalescing then it is prudent. All prudent things are coalescing. If something is coalescing then it is unremarked. All unremarked, burbling things are leftish. All baptistic things are coalescing. Green things are burbling. If Fulvia is vacillant and Fulvia is baptistic then Fulvia is leftish. If something is baptistic and unremarked then it is coalescing. Fulvia is unremarked.", "logic": "\nBurbling(orton)\nBurbling(fulvia)\nBaptistic(tailor)\nforall x (Coalescing(x) -> Prudent(x))\nforall x (Prudent(x) -> Coalescing(x))\nforall x (Coalescing(x) -> Unremarked(x))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) and Burbling(x) -> Leftish(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) -> Coalescing(x))\nforall x (Prudent(x) -> Burbling(x))\nVacillant(fulvia) and Baptistic(fulvia) -> Leftish(fulvia)\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Unremarked(x) -> Coalescing(x))\n\nUnremarked(fulvia)\n\nforall x (Coalescing(x) -> Unremarked(x)) <- forall x (Prudent(x) -> Coalescing(x)) <- forall x (Coalescing(x) -> Prudent(x)) <- forall x (Baptistic(x) -> Coalescing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Quinn is uvular. Beowulf is uvular. Zora is beltless. If something is flagellate then it is latent. All latent things are flagellate. If something is flagellate then it is siouan. All siouan, uvular things are unplowed. All beltless things are flagellate. Green things are uvular. If Beowulf is sloped and Beowulf is beltless then Beowulf is unplowed. If something is beltless and siouan then it is flagellate. Quinn is not siouan.", "logic": "\nUvular(quinn)\nUvular(beowulf)\nBeltless(zora)\nforall x (Flagellate(x) -> Latent(x))\nforall x (Latent(x) -> Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) -> Siouan(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) and Uvular(x) -> Unplowed(x))\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Latent(x) -> Uvular(x))\nSloped(beowulf) and Beltless(beowulf) -> Unplowed(beowulf)\nforall x (Beltless(x) and Siouan(x) -> Flagellate(x))\n\nnot Siouan(quinn)\n\nforall x (Flagellate(x) -> Siouan(x)) <- forall x (Latent(x) -> Flagellate(x)) <- forall x (Flagellate(x) -> Latent(x)) <- forall x (Beltless(x) -> Flagellate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Harlin is unapparent. Corilla is unapparent. Lanette is unspoken. If something is tutelary then it is conic. All conic things are tutelary. If something is tutelary then it is snotty. All snotty, unapparent things are pitiless. All unspoken things are tutelary. Green things are unapparent. If Corilla is sinless and Corilla is unspoken then Corilla is pitiless. If something is unspoken and snotty then it is tutelary. Harlin is pitiless.", "logic": "\nUnapparent(harlin)\nUnapparent(corilla)\nUnspoken(lanette)\nforall x (Tutelary(x) -> Conic(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Tutelary(x) -> Snotty(x))\nforall x (Snotty(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Pitiless(x))\nforall x (Unspoken(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Unapparent(x))\nSinless(corilla) and Unspoken(corilla) -> Pitiless(corilla)\nforall x (Unspoken(x) and Snotty(x) -> Tutelary(x))\n\nPitiless(harlin)\n\nforall x (Snotty(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Pitiless(x)) <- forall x (Tutelary(x) -> Snotty(x)) <- forall x (Conic(x) -> Tutelary(x)) <- forall x (Tutelary(x) -> Conic(x)) <- forall x (Unspoken(x) -> Tutelary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Virgina is stentorian. Archibold is stentorian. Babs is floral. If something is sightly then it is anguished. All anguished things are sightly. If something is sightly then it is involved. All involved, stentorian things are staccato. All floral things are sightly. Green things are stentorian. If Archibold is danceable and Archibold is floral then Archibold is staccato. If something is floral and involved then it is sightly. Babs is not danceable.", "logic": "\nStentorian(virgina)\nStentorian(archibold)\nFloral(babs)\nforall x (Sightly(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Anguished(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Sightly(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) and Stentorian(x) -> Staccato(x))\nforall x (Floral(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Anguished(x) -> Stentorian(x))\nDanceable(archibold) and Floral(archibold) -> Staccato(archibold)\nforall x (Floral(x) and Involved(x) -> Sightly(x))\n\nnot Danceable(babs)\n\nnot Danceable(babs) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Casper is schizoid. Kimmy is schizoid. Bethanne is pleural. If something is luscious then it is glib. All glib things are luscious. If something is luscious then it is recumbent. All recumbent, schizoid things are historied. All pleural things are luscious. Green things are schizoid. If Kimmy is abient and Kimmy is pleural then Kimmy is historied. If something is pleural and recumbent then it is luscious. Casper is pleural.", "logic": "\nSchizoid(casper)\nSchizoid(kimmy)\nPleural(bethanne)\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> Glib(x))\nforall x (Glib(x) -> Luscious(x))\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> Recumbent(x))\nforall x (Recumbent(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> Luscious(x))\nforall x (Glib(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nAbient(kimmy) and Pleural(kimmy) -> Historied(kimmy)\nforall x (Pleural(x) and Recumbent(x) -> Luscious(x))\n\nPleural(casper)\n\nPleural(casper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Stephine is orangish. Wilmar is orangish. Robert is spiny. If something is onside then it is earnest. All earnest things are onside. If something is onside then it is impaired. All impaired, orangish things are uniparous. All spiny things are onside. Green things are orangish. If Wilmar is dandy and Wilmar is spiny then Wilmar is uniparous. If something is spiny and impaired then it is onside. Wilmar is not spiny.", "logic": "\nOrangish(stephine)\nOrangish(wilmar)\nSpiny(robert)\nforall x (Onside(x) -> Earnest(x))\nforall x (Earnest(x) -> Onside(x))\nforall x (Onside(x) -> Impaired(x))\nforall x (Impaired(x) and Orangish(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Spiny(x) -> Onside(x))\nforall x (Earnest(x) -> Orangish(x))\nDandy(wilmar) and Spiny(wilmar) -> Uniparous(wilmar)\nforall x (Spiny(x) and Impaired(x) -> Onside(x))\n\nnot Spiny(wilmar)\n\nnot Spiny(wilmar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Tabatha is motiveless. Ambrosio is motiveless. Loella is serologic. If something is contiguous then it is forgivable. All forgivable things are contiguous. If something is contiguous then it is familial. All familial, motiveless things are taxonomic. All serologic things are contiguous. Green things are motiveless. If Ambrosio is tippy and Ambrosio is serologic then Ambrosio is taxonomic. If something is serologic and familial then it is contiguous. Ambrosio is tippy.", "logic": "\nMotiveless(tabatha)\nMotiveless(ambrosio)\nSerologic(loella)\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Forgivable(x))\nforall x (Forgivable(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Familial(x))\nforall x (Familial(x) and Motiveless(x) -> Taxonomic(x))\nforall x (Serologic(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Forgivable(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nTippy(ambrosio) and Serologic(ambrosio) -> Taxonomic(ambrosio)\nforall x (Serologic(x) and Familial(x) -> Contiguous(x))\n\nTippy(ambrosio)\n\nTippy(ambrosio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "The valina bunk the renelle. The valina bunk the templeton. The valina is shingly. The valina is disjoined. The valina tremble the templeton. The renelle punt the valina. The renelle punt the templeton. The renelle bunk the valina. The templeton punt the renelle. The templeton is shingly. The templeton is crotchety. The templeton is loosened. If the valina punt the templeton then the valina punt the renelle. If the valina punt the templeton then the templeton bunk the valina. If something tremble the templeton then the templeton is unhindered. If something is crotchety and disjoined then it does not chase the valina. If something is unhindered then it is disjoined. If something is disjoined and it does not eat the renelle then it does not need the valina. The templeton is crotchety.", "logic": "\nBunk(valina, renelle)\nBunk(valina, templeton)\nShingly(valina)\nDisjoined(valina)\nTremble(valina, templeton)\nPunt(renelle, valina)\nPunt(renelle, templeton)\nBunk(renelle, valina)\nPunt(templeton, renelle)\nShingly(templeton)\nCrotchety(templeton)\nLoosened(templeton)\nPunt(valina, templeton) -> Punt(valina, renelle)\nPunt(valina, templeton) -> Bunk(templeton, valina)\nforall x (Tremble(x, templeton) -> Unhindered(templeton))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Disjoined(x) -> not Punt(x, valina))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Disjoined(x) and not Bunk(x, renelle) -> not Tremble(x, valina))\n\nCrotchety(templeton)\n\ntherefore Crotchety(templeton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The sherrie quiz the judah. The sherrie quiz the lisa. The sherrie is inscribed. The sherrie is smoked. The sherrie degust the lisa. The judah vitaminize the sherrie. The judah vitaminize the lisa. The judah quiz the sherrie. The lisa vitaminize the judah. The lisa is inscribed. The lisa is ambrosian. The lisa is forfeit. If the sherrie vitaminize the lisa then the sherrie vitaminize the judah. If the sherrie vitaminize the lisa then the lisa quiz the sherrie. If something degust the lisa then the lisa is unstilted. If something is ambrosian and smoked then it does not chase the sherrie. If something is unstilted then it is smoked. If something is smoked and it does not eat the judah then it does not need the sherrie. The sherrie does not need the lisa.", "logic": "\nQuiz(sherrie, judah)\nQuiz(sherrie, lisa)\nInscribed(sherrie)\nSmoked(sherrie)\nDegust(sherrie, lisa)\nVitaminize(judah, sherrie)\nVitaminize(judah, lisa)\nQuiz(judah, sherrie)\nVitaminize(lisa, judah)\nInscribed(lisa)\nAmbrosian(lisa)\nForfeit(lisa)\nVitaminize(sherrie, lisa) -> Vitaminize(sherrie, judah)\nVitaminize(sherrie, lisa) -> Quiz(lisa, sherrie)\nforall x (Degust(x, lisa) -> Unstilted(lisa))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) and Smoked(x) -> not Vitaminize(x, sherrie))\nforall x (Unstilted(x) -> Smoked(x))\nforall x (Smoked(x) and not Quiz(x, judah) -> not Degust(x, sherrie))\n\nnot Degust(sherrie, lisa)\n\ntherefore Degust(sherrie, lisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The derrick waitress the bernardo. The derrick waitress the maribelle. The derrick is malawian. The derrick is stated. The derrick dunk the maribelle. The bernardo impanel the derrick. The bernardo impanel the maribelle. The bernardo waitress the derrick. The maribelle impanel the bernardo. The maribelle is malawian. The maribelle is subalpine. The maribelle is basophilic. If the derrick impanel the maribelle then the derrick impanel the bernardo. If the derrick impanel the maribelle then the maribelle waitress the derrick. If something dunk the maribelle then the maribelle is syphilitic. If something is subalpine and stated then it does not chase the derrick. If something is syphilitic then it is stated. If something is stated and it does not eat the bernardo then it does not need the derrick. The maribelle is syphilitic.", "logic": "\nWaitress(derrick, bernardo)\nWaitress(derrick, maribelle)\nMalawian(derrick)\nStated(derrick)\nDunk(derrick, maribelle)\nImpanel(bernardo, derrick)\nImpanel(bernardo, maribelle)\nWaitress(bernardo, derrick)\nImpanel(maribelle, bernardo)\nMalawian(maribelle)\nSubalpine(maribelle)\nBasophilic(maribelle)\nImpanel(derrick, maribelle) -> Impanel(derrick, bernardo)\nImpanel(derrick, maribelle) -> Waitress(maribelle, derrick)\nforall x (Dunk(x, maribelle) -> Syphilitic(maribelle))\nforall x (Subalpine(x) and Stated(x) -> not Impanel(x, derrick))\nforall x (Syphilitic(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (Stated(x) and not Waitress(x, bernardo) -> not Dunk(x, derrick))\n\nSyphilitic(maribelle)\n\nDunk(derrick, maribelle) and forall x (Dunk(x, maribelle) -> Syphilitic(maribelle)) -> therefore Syphilitic(maribelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The kitti preempt the meggi. The kitti preempt the rosita. The kitti is bovine. The kitti is painless. The kitti assuage the rosita. The meggi tumesce the kitti. The meggi tumesce the rosita. The meggi preempt the kitti. The rosita tumesce the meggi. The rosita is bovine. The rosita is circinate. The rosita is unhelpful. If the kitti tumesce the rosita then the kitti tumesce the meggi. If the kitti tumesce the rosita then the rosita preempt the kitti. If something assuage the rosita then the rosita is endogenous. If something is circinate and painless then it does not chase the kitti. If something is endogenous then it is painless. If something is painless and it does not eat the meggi then it does not need the kitti. The rosita is not endogenous.", "logic": "\nPreempt(kitti, meggi)\nPreempt(kitti, rosita)\nBovine(kitti)\nPainless(kitti)\nAssuage(kitti, rosita)\nTumesce(meggi, kitti)\nTumesce(meggi, rosita)\nPreempt(meggi, kitti)\nTumesce(rosita, meggi)\nBovine(rosita)\nCircinate(rosita)\nUnhelpful(rosita)\nTumesce(kitti, rosita) -> Tumesce(kitti, meggi)\nTumesce(kitti, rosita) -> Preempt(rosita, kitti)\nforall x (Assuage(x, rosita) -> Endogenous(rosita))\nforall x (Circinate(x) and Painless(x) -> not Tumesce(x, kitti))\nforall x (Endogenous(x) -> Painless(x))\nforall x (Painless(x) and not Preempt(x, meggi) -> not Assuage(x, kitti))\n\nnot Endogenous(rosita)\n\nAssuage(kitti, rosita) and forall x (Assuage(x, rosita) -> Endogenous(rosita)) -> therefore Endogenous(rosita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The janna mastermind the prince. The janna mastermind the hakim. The janna is astute. The janna is blastular. The janna unburden the hakim. The prince silver the janna. The prince silver the hakim. The prince mastermind the janna. The hakim silver the prince. The hakim is astute. The hakim is prominent. The hakim is wesleyan. If the janna silver the hakim then the janna silver the prince. If the janna silver the hakim then the hakim mastermind the janna. If something unburden the hakim then the hakim is pithy. If something is prominent and blastular then it does not chase the janna. If something is pithy then it is blastular. If something is blastular and it does not eat the prince then it does not need the janna. The hakim is blastular.", "logic": "\nMastermind(janna, prince)\nMastermind(janna, hakim)\nAstute(janna)\nBlastular(janna)\nUnburden(janna, hakim)\nSilver(prince, janna)\nSilver(prince, hakim)\nMastermind(prince, janna)\nSilver(hakim, prince)\nAstute(hakim)\nProminent(hakim)\nWesleyan(hakim)\nSilver(janna, hakim) -> Silver(janna, prince)\nSilver(janna, hakim) -> Mastermind(hakim, janna)\nforall x (Unburden(x, hakim) -> Pithy(hakim))\nforall x (Prominent(x) and Blastular(x) -> not Silver(x, janna))\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Blastular(x) and not Mastermind(x, prince) -> not Unburden(x, janna))\n\nBlastular(hakim)\n\nUnburden(janna, hakim) and forall x (Unburden(x, hakim) -> Pithy(hakim)) -> therefore Pithy(hakim) Pithy(hakim) and forall x (Pithy(x) -> Blastular(x)) -> therefore Blastular(hakim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The georgena ionise the andromeda. The georgena ionise the izabel. The georgena is uninviting. The georgena is trilobated. The georgena confine the izabel. The andromeda chain the georgena. The andromeda chain the izabel. The andromeda ionise the georgena. The izabel chain the andromeda. The izabel is uninviting. The izabel is nontaxable. The izabel is misbegot. If the georgena chain the izabel then the georgena chain the andromeda. If the georgena chain the izabel then the izabel ionise the georgena. If something confine the izabel then the izabel is eidetic. If something is nontaxable and trilobated then it does not chase the georgena. If something is eidetic then it is trilobated. If something is trilobated and it does not eat the andromeda then it does not need the georgena. The izabel is not trilobated.", "logic": "\nIonise(georgena, andromeda)\nIonise(georgena, izabel)\nUninviting(georgena)\nTrilobated(georgena)\nConfine(georgena, izabel)\nChain(andromeda, georgena)\nChain(andromeda, izabel)\nIonise(andromeda, georgena)\nChain(izabel, andromeda)\nUninviting(izabel)\nNontaxable(izabel)\nMisbegot(izabel)\nChain(georgena, izabel) -> Chain(georgena, andromeda)\nChain(georgena, izabel) -> Ionise(izabel, georgena)\nforall x (Confine(x, izabel) -> Eidetic(izabel))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and Trilobated(x) -> not Chain(x, georgena))\nforall x (Eidetic(x) -> Trilobated(x))\nforall x (Trilobated(x) and not Ionise(x, andromeda) -> not Confine(x, georgena))\n\nnot Trilobated(izabel)\n\nConfine(georgena, izabel) and forall x (Confine(x, izabel) -> Eidetic(izabel)) -> therefore Eidetic(izabel) Eidetic(izabel) and forall x (Eidetic(x) -> Trilobated(x)) -> therefore Trilobated(izabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The vena temper the cristina. The vena temper the avraham. The vena is embryonic. The vena is mythic. The vena suntan the avraham. The cristina severalise the vena. The cristina severalise the avraham. The cristina temper the vena. The avraham severalise the cristina. The avraham is embryonic. The avraham is viricidal. The avraham is phenomenal. If the vena severalise the avraham then the vena severalise the cristina. If the vena severalise the avraham then the avraham temper the vena. If something suntan the avraham then the avraham is azure. If something is viricidal and mythic then it does not chase the vena. If something is azure then it is mythic. If something is mythic and it does not eat the cristina then it does not need the vena. The avraham does not chase the vena.", "logic": "\nTemper(vena, cristina)\nTemper(vena, avraham)\nEmbryonic(vena)\nMythic(vena)\nSuntan(vena, avraham)\nSeveralise(cristina, vena)\nSeveralise(cristina, avraham)\nTemper(cristina, vena)\nSeveralise(avraham, cristina)\nEmbryonic(avraham)\nViricidal(avraham)\nPhenomenal(avraham)\nSeveralise(vena, avraham) -> Severalise(vena, cristina)\nSeveralise(vena, avraham) -> Temper(avraham, vena)\nforall x (Suntan(x, avraham) -> Azure(avraham))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) and Mythic(x) -> not Severalise(x, vena))\nforall x (Azure(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) and not Temper(x, cristina) -> not Suntan(x, vena))\n\nnot Severalise(avraham, vena)\n\nSuntan(vena, avraham) and forall x (Suntan(x, avraham) -> Azure(avraham)) -> therefore Azure(avraham) Azure(avraham) and forall x (Azure(x) -> Mythic(x)) -> therefore Mythic(avraham) Viricidal(avraham) and Mythic(avraham) and forall x (Viricidal(x) and Mythic(x) -> not Severalise(x, vena)) -> therefore not Severalise(avraham, vena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The paul decode the oberon. The paul decode the lemmie. The paul is libyan. The paul is geocentric. The paul brainwash the lemmie. The oberon taint the paul. The oberon taint the lemmie. The oberon decode the paul. The lemmie taint the oberon. The lemmie is libyan. The lemmie is lubricious. The lemmie is jutting. If the paul taint the lemmie then the paul taint the oberon. If the paul taint the lemmie then the lemmie decode the paul. If something brainwash the lemmie then the lemmie is moire. If something is lubricious and geocentric then it does not chase the paul. If something is moire then it is geocentric. If something is geocentric and it does not eat the oberon then it does not need the paul. The lemmie taint the paul.", "logic": "\nDecode(paul, oberon)\nDecode(paul, lemmie)\nLibyan(paul)\nGeocentric(paul)\nBrainwash(paul, lemmie)\nTaint(oberon, paul)\nTaint(oberon, lemmie)\nDecode(oberon, paul)\nTaint(lemmie, oberon)\nLibyan(lemmie)\nLubricious(lemmie)\nJutting(lemmie)\nTaint(paul, lemmie) -> Taint(paul, oberon)\nTaint(paul, lemmie) -> Decode(lemmie, paul)\nforall x (Brainwash(x, lemmie) -> Moire(lemmie))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Geocentric(x) -> not Taint(x, paul))\nforall x (Moire(x) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Geocentric(x) and not Decode(x, oberon) -> not Brainwash(x, paul))\n\nTaint(lemmie, paul)\n\nBrainwash(paul, lemmie) and forall x (Brainwash(x, lemmie) -> Moire(lemmie)) -> therefore Moire(lemmie) Moire(lemmie) and forall x (Moire(x) -> Geocentric(x)) -> therefore Geocentric(lemmie) Lubricious(lemmie) and Geocentric(lemmie) and forall x (Lubricious(x) and Geocentric(x) -> not Taint(x, paul)) -> therefore not Taint(lemmie, paul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The helise scour the laura. The helise scour the randene. The helise is likely. The helise is afflicted. The helise oxygenize the randene. The laura galvanise the helise. The laura galvanise the randene. The laura scour the helise. The randene galvanise the laura. The randene is likely. The randene is ruffianly. The randene is ancient. If the helise galvanise the randene then the helise galvanise the laura. If the helise galvanise the randene then the randene scour the helise. If something oxygenize the randene then the randene is bully. If something is ruffianly and afflicted then it does not chase the helise. If something is bully then it is afflicted. If something is afflicted and it does not eat the laura then it does not need the helise. The laura is not afflicted.", "logic": "\nScour(helise, laura)\nScour(helise, randene)\nLikely(helise)\nAfflicted(helise)\nOxygenize(helise, randene)\nGalvanise(laura, helise)\nGalvanise(laura, randene)\nScour(laura, helise)\nGalvanise(randene, laura)\nLikely(randene)\nRuffianly(randene)\nAncient(randene)\nGalvanise(helise, randene) -> Galvanise(helise, laura)\nGalvanise(helise, randene) -> Scour(randene, helise)\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, randene) -> Bully(randene))\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) and Afflicted(x) -> not Galvanise(x, helise))\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and not Scour(x, laura) -> not Oxygenize(x, helise))\n\nnot Afflicted(laura)\n\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Afflicted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The hali welter the ginny. The hali welter the pollyanna. The hali is plebeian. The hali is knobbly. The hali perturb the pollyanna. The ginny google the hali. The ginny google the pollyanna. The ginny welter the hali. The pollyanna google the ginny. The pollyanna is plebeian. The pollyanna is endemical. The pollyanna is longhand. If the hali google the pollyanna then the hali google the ginny. If the hali google the pollyanna then the pollyanna welter the hali. If something perturb the pollyanna then the pollyanna is ergodic. If something is endemical and knobbly then it does not chase the hali. If something is ergodic then it is knobbly. If something is knobbly and it does not eat the ginny then it does not need the hali. The pollyanna welter the hali.", "logic": "\nWelter(hali, ginny)\nWelter(hali, pollyanna)\nPlebeian(hali)\nKnobbly(hali)\nPerturb(hali, pollyanna)\nGoogle(ginny, hali)\nGoogle(ginny, pollyanna)\nWelter(ginny, hali)\nGoogle(pollyanna, ginny)\nPlebeian(pollyanna)\nEndemical(pollyanna)\nLonghand(pollyanna)\nGoogle(hali, pollyanna) -> Google(hali, ginny)\nGoogle(hali, pollyanna) -> Welter(pollyanna, hali)\nforall x (Perturb(x, pollyanna) -> Ergodic(pollyanna))\nforall x (Endemical(x) and Knobbly(x) -> not Google(x, hali))\nforall x (Ergodic(x) -> Knobbly(x))\nforall x (Knobbly(x) and not Welter(x, ginny) -> not Perturb(x, hali))\n\nWelter(pollyanna, hali)\n\nGoogle(hali, pollyanna) -> Welter(pollyanna, hali) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The gregory ammoniate the joscelin. The gregory ammoniate the terrill. The gregory is yankee. The gregory is ototoxic. The gregory stew the terrill. The joscelin lave the gregory. The joscelin lave the terrill. The joscelin ammoniate the gregory. The terrill lave the joscelin. The terrill is yankee. The terrill is haitian. The terrill is phonic. If the gregory lave the terrill then the gregory lave the joscelin. If the gregory lave the terrill then the terrill ammoniate the gregory. If something stew the terrill then the terrill is anomic. If something is haitian and ototoxic then it does not chase the gregory. If something is anomic then it is ototoxic. If something is ototoxic and it does not eat the joscelin then it does not need the gregory. The gregory does not chase the joscelin.", "logic": "\nAmmoniate(gregory, joscelin)\nAmmoniate(gregory, terrill)\nYankee(gregory)\nOtotoxic(gregory)\nStew(gregory, terrill)\nLave(joscelin, gregory)\nLave(joscelin, terrill)\nAmmoniate(joscelin, gregory)\nLave(terrill, joscelin)\nYankee(terrill)\nHaitian(terrill)\nPhonic(terrill)\nLave(gregory, terrill) -> Lave(gregory, joscelin)\nLave(gregory, terrill) -> Ammoniate(terrill, gregory)\nforall x (Stew(x, terrill) -> Anomic(terrill))\nforall x (Haitian(x) and Ototoxic(x) -> not Lave(x, gregory))\nforall x (Anomic(x) -> Ototoxic(x))\nforall x (Ototoxic(x) and not Ammoniate(x, joscelin) -> not Stew(x, gregory))\n\nnot Lave(gregory, joscelin)\n\nLave(gregory, terrill) -> Lave(gregory, joscelin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The philippa antic the napoleon. The philippa antic the rhonda. The philippa is centric. The philippa is rickety. The philippa aggravate the rhonda. The napoleon treadle the philippa. The napoleon treadle the rhonda. The napoleon antic the philippa. The rhonda treadle the napoleon. The rhonda is centric. The rhonda is glooming. The rhonda is tarry. If the philippa treadle the rhonda then the philippa treadle the napoleon. If the philippa treadle the rhonda then the rhonda antic the philippa. If something aggravate the rhonda then the rhonda is inland. If something is glooming and rickety then it does not chase the philippa. If something is inland then it is rickety. If something is rickety and it does not eat the napoleon then it does not need the philippa. The philippa is inland.", "logic": "\nAntic(philippa, napoleon)\nAntic(philippa, rhonda)\nCentric(philippa)\nRickety(philippa)\nAggravate(philippa, rhonda)\nTreadle(napoleon, philippa)\nTreadle(napoleon, rhonda)\nAntic(napoleon, philippa)\nTreadle(rhonda, napoleon)\nCentric(rhonda)\nGlooming(rhonda)\nTarry(rhonda)\nTreadle(philippa, rhonda) -> Treadle(philippa, napoleon)\nTreadle(philippa, rhonda) -> Antic(rhonda, philippa)\nforall x (Aggravate(x, rhonda) -> Inland(rhonda))\nforall x (Glooming(x) and Rickety(x) -> not Treadle(x, philippa))\nforall x (Inland(x) -> Rickety(x))\nforall x (Rickety(x) and not Antic(x, napoleon) -> not Aggravate(x, philippa))\n\nInland(philippa)\n\nInland(philippa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The stevy tango the rozanne. The stevy tango the vergil. The stevy is inviolable. The stevy is jointed. The stevy farce the vergil. The rozanne pooch the stevy. The rozanne pooch the vergil. The rozanne tango the stevy. The vergil pooch the rozanne. The vergil is inviolable. The vergil is montane. The vergil is nineteenth. If the stevy pooch the vergil then the stevy pooch the rozanne. If the stevy pooch the vergil then the vergil tango the stevy. If something farce the vergil then the vergil is biaxate. If something is montane and jointed then it does not chase the stevy. If something is biaxate then it is jointed. If something is jointed and it does not eat the rozanne then it does not need the stevy. The vergil does not need the vergil.", "logic": "\nTango(stevy, rozanne)\nTango(stevy, vergil)\nInviolable(stevy)\nJointed(stevy)\nFarce(stevy, vergil)\nPooch(rozanne, stevy)\nPooch(rozanne, vergil)\nTango(rozanne, stevy)\nPooch(vergil, rozanne)\nInviolable(vergil)\nMontane(vergil)\nNineteenth(vergil)\nPooch(stevy, vergil) -> Pooch(stevy, rozanne)\nPooch(stevy, vergil) -> Tango(vergil, stevy)\nforall x (Farce(x, vergil) -> Biaxate(vergil))\nforall x (Montane(x) and Jointed(x) -> not Pooch(x, stevy))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> Jointed(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) and not Tango(x, rozanne) -> not Farce(x, stevy))\n\nnot Farce(vergil, vergil)\n\nnot Farce(vergil, vergil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The roseline exonerate the len. The roseline exonerate the alleen. The roseline is pyaemic. The roseline is sixth. The roseline brandish the alleen. The len towel the roseline. The len towel the alleen. The len exonerate the roseline. The alleen towel the len. The alleen is pyaemic. The alleen is formosan. The alleen is pulseless. If the roseline towel the alleen then the roseline towel the len. If the roseline towel the alleen then the alleen exonerate the roseline. If something brandish the alleen then the alleen is carmine. If something is formosan and sixth then it does not chase the roseline. If something is carmine then it is sixth. If something is sixth and it does not eat the len then it does not need the roseline. The len is pyaemic.", "logic": "\nExonerate(roseline, len)\nExonerate(roseline, alleen)\nPyaemic(roseline)\nSixth(roseline)\nBrandish(roseline, alleen)\nTowel(len, roseline)\nTowel(len, alleen)\nExonerate(len, roseline)\nTowel(alleen, len)\nPyaemic(alleen)\nFormosan(alleen)\nPulseless(alleen)\nTowel(roseline, alleen) -> Towel(roseline, len)\nTowel(roseline, alleen) -> Exonerate(alleen, roseline)\nforall x (Brandish(x, alleen) -> Carmine(alleen))\nforall x (Formosan(x) and Sixth(x) -> not Towel(x, roseline))\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> Sixth(x))\nforall x (Sixth(x) and not Exonerate(x, len) -> not Brandish(x, roseline))\n\nPyaemic(len)\n\nPyaemic(len) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The elmore stock the ninetta. The elmore stock the pete. The elmore is master. The elmore is restless. The elmore bulldoze the pete. The ninetta underbid the elmore. The ninetta underbid the pete. The ninetta stock the elmore. The pete underbid the ninetta. The pete is master. The pete is unethical. The pete is yummy. If the elmore underbid the pete then the elmore underbid the ninetta. If the elmore underbid the pete then the pete stock the elmore. If something bulldoze the pete then the pete is deweyan. If something is unethical and restless then it does not chase the elmore. If something is deweyan then it is restless. If something is restless and it does not eat the ninetta then it does not need the elmore. The pete does not eat the ninetta.", "logic": "\nStock(elmore, ninetta)\nStock(elmore, pete)\nMaster(elmore)\nRestless(elmore)\nBulldoze(elmore, pete)\nUnderbid(ninetta, elmore)\nUnderbid(ninetta, pete)\nStock(ninetta, elmore)\nUnderbid(pete, ninetta)\nMaster(pete)\nUnethical(pete)\nYummy(pete)\nUnderbid(elmore, pete) -> Underbid(elmore, ninetta)\nUnderbid(elmore, pete) -> Stock(pete, elmore)\nforall x (Bulldoze(x, pete) -> Deweyan(pete))\nforall x (Unethical(x) and Restless(x) -> not Underbid(x, elmore))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Restless(x))\nforall x (Restless(x) and not Stock(x, ninetta) -> not Bulldoze(x, elmore))\n\nnot Stock(pete, ninetta)\n\nnot Stock(pete, ninetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The jonas ideate the arielle. The jonas ideate the jerrold. The jonas is pensive. The jonas is hyperopic. The jonas spoof the jerrold. The arielle pity the jonas. The arielle pity the jerrold. The arielle ideate the jonas. The jerrold pity the arielle. The jerrold is pensive. The jerrold is zesty. The jerrold is jingoistic. If the jonas pity the jerrold then the jonas pity the arielle. If the jonas pity the jerrold then the jerrold ideate the jonas. If something spoof the jerrold then the jerrold is spacious. If something is zesty and hyperopic then it does not chase the jonas. If something is spacious then it is hyperopic. If something is hyperopic and it does not eat the arielle then it does not need the jonas. The jerrold spoof the jonas.", "logic": "\nIdeate(jonas, arielle)\nIdeate(jonas, jerrold)\nPensive(jonas)\nHyperopic(jonas)\nSpoof(jonas, jerrold)\nPity(arielle, jonas)\nPity(arielle, jerrold)\nIdeate(arielle, jonas)\nPity(jerrold, arielle)\nPensive(jerrold)\nZesty(jerrold)\nJingoistic(jerrold)\nPity(jonas, jerrold) -> Pity(jonas, arielle)\nPity(jonas, jerrold) -> Ideate(jerrold, jonas)\nforall x (Spoof(x, jerrold) -> Spacious(jerrold))\nforall x (Zesty(x) and Hyperopic(x) -> not Pity(x, jonas))\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Hyperopic(x) and not Ideate(x, arielle) -> not Spoof(x, jonas))\n\nSpoof(jerrold, jonas)\n\nSpoof(jerrold, jonas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Hiram is forty. Rudy is arguable. Rudy is operose. Red things are sodding. All sodding, unexceeded things are forty. If something is forty then it is operose. All arguable, pomaded things are forty. All pomaded things are rotatory. If Hiram is operose then Hiram is arguable. Furry, forty things are rotatory. If something is operose and arguable then it is pomaded. Rudy is operose.", "logic": "\nForty(hiram)\nArguable(rudy)\nOperose(rudy)\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Unexceeded(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Forty(x) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Arguable(x) and Pomaded(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) -> Rotatory(x))\nOperose(hiram) -> Arguable(hiram)\nforall x (Pomaded(x) and Forty(x) -> Rotatory(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) and Arguable(x) -> Pomaded(x))\n\nOperose(rudy)\n\ntherefore Operose(rudy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Renato is rosy. Haskell is unshakable. Haskell is chapped. Red things are lancelike. All lancelike, galling things are rosy. If something is rosy then it is chapped. All unshakable, anaglyphic things are rosy. All anaglyphic things are expurgated. If Renato is chapped then Renato is unshakable. Furry, rosy things are expurgated. If something is chapped and unshakable then it is anaglyphic. Renato is not rosy.", "logic": "\nRosy(renato)\nUnshakable(haskell)\nChapped(haskell)\nforall x (Galling(x) -> Lancelike(x))\nforall x (Lancelike(x) and Galling(x) -> Rosy(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) -> Chapped(x))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) and Anaglyphic(x) -> Rosy(x))\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) -> Expurgated(x))\nChapped(renato) -> Unshakable(renato)\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) and Rosy(x) -> Expurgated(x))\nforall x (Chapped(x) and Unshakable(x) -> Anaglyphic(x))\n\nnot Rosy(renato)\n\ntherefore Rosy(renato)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Ishmael is colonial. Rosemarie is surgical. Rosemarie is hungarian. Red things are tentacled. All tentacled, nerveless things are colonial. If something is colonial then it is hungarian. All surgical, myocardial things are colonial. All myocardial things are framed. If Ishmael is hungarian then Ishmael is surgical. Furry, colonial things are framed. If something is hungarian and surgical then it is myocardial. Rosemarie is myocardial.", "logic": "\nColonial(ishmael)\nSurgical(rosemarie)\nHungarian(rosemarie)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Tentacled(x) and Nerveless(x) -> Colonial(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Hungarian(x))\nforall x (Surgical(x) and Myocardial(x) -> Colonial(x))\nforall x (Myocardial(x) -> Framed(x))\nHungarian(ishmael) -> Surgical(ishmael)\nforall x (Myocardial(x) and Colonial(x) -> Framed(x))\nforall x (Hungarian(x) and Surgical(x) -> Myocardial(x))\n\nMyocardial(rosemarie)\n\nHungarian(rosemarie) and Surgical(rosemarie) and forall x (Hungarian(x) and Surgical(x) -> Myocardial(x)) -> therefore Myocardial(rosemarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Andrey is ambrosial. Tynan is ravening. Tynan is hardback. Red things are noteworthy. All noteworthy, slatternly things are ambrosial. If something is ambrosial then it is hardback. All ravening, toed things are ambrosial. All toed things are antebellum. If Andrey is hardback then Andrey is ravening. Furry, ambrosial things are antebellum. If something is hardback and ravening then it is toed. Tynan is not toed.", "logic": "\nAmbrosial(andrey)\nRavening(tynan)\nHardback(tynan)\nforall x (Slatternly(x) -> Noteworthy(x))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) and Slatternly(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\nforall x (Ambrosial(x) -> Hardback(x))\nforall x (Ravening(x) and Toed(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\nforall x (Toed(x) -> Antebellum(x))\nHardback(andrey) -> Ravening(andrey)\nforall x (Toed(x) and Ambrosial(x) -> Antebellum(x))\nforall x (Hardback(x) and Ravening(x) -> Toed(x))\n\nnot Toed(tynan)\n\nHardback(tynan) and Ravening(tynan) and forall x (Hardback(x) and Ravening(x) -> Toed(x)) -> therefore Toed(tynan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Tove is insomniac. Garey is bicornuate. Garey is proven. Red things are consultive. All consultive, shadowy things are insomniac. If something is insomniac then it is proven. All bicornuate, leathery things are insomniac. All leathery things are theist. If Tove is proven then Tove is bicornuate. Furry, insomniac things are theist. If something is proven and bicornuate then it is leathery. Tove is bicornuate.", "logic": "\nInsomniac(tove)\nBicornuate(garey)\nProven(garey)\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Consultive(x))\nforall x (Consultive(x) and Shadowy(x) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Insomniac(x) -> Proven(x))\nforall x (Bicornuate(x) and Leathery(x) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Leathery(x) -> Theist(x))\nProven(tove) -> Bicornuate(tove)\nforall x (Leathery(x) and Insomniac(x) -> Theist(x))\nforall x (Proven(x) and Bicornuate(x) -> Leathery(x))\n\nBicornuate(tove)\n\nInsomniac(tove) and forall x (Insomniac(x) -> Proven(x)) -> therefore Proven(tove) Proven(tove) and Proven(tove) -> Bicornuate(tove) -> therefore Bicornuate(tove)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Grata is extra. Haskell is breathless. Haskell is divisional. Red things are envious. All envious, resistless things are extra. If something is extra then it is divisional. All breathless, exhaustive things are extra. All exhaustive things are hermitical. If Grata is divisional then Grata is breathless. Furry, extra things are hermitical. If something is divisional and breathless then it is exhaustive. Haskell is not hermitical.", "logic": "\nExtra(grata)\nBreathless(haskell)\nDivisional(haskell)\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> Envious(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) and Resistless(x) -> Extra(x))\nforall x (Extra(x) -> Divisional(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) and Exhaustive(x) -> Extra(x))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Hermitical(x))\nDivisional(grata) -> Breathless(grata)\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) and Extra(x) -> Hermitical(x))\nforall x (Divisional(x) and Breathless(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\n\nnot Hermitical(haskell)\n\nDivisional(haskell) and Breathless(haskell) and forall x (Divisional(x) and Breathless(x) -> Exhaustive(x)) -> therefore Exhaustive(haskell) Exhaustive(haskell) and forall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Hermitical(x)) -> therefore Hermitical(haskell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Torrey is inharmonic. Nadean is shellproof. Nadean is stupefying. Red things are monoclonal. All monoclonal, achromatic things are inharmonic. If something is inharmonic then it is stupefying. All shellproof, dendritic things are inharmonic. All dendritic things are hammered. If Torrey is stupefying then Torrey is shellproof. Furry, inharmonic things are hammered. If something is stupefying and shellproof then it is dendritic. Torrey is dendritic.", "logic": "\nInharmonic(torrey)\nShellproof(nadean)\nStupefying(nadean)\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Stupefying(x))\nforall x (Shellproof(x) and Dendritic(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\nforall x (Dendritic(x) -> Hammered(x))\nStupefying(torrey) -> Shellproof(torrey)\nforall x (Dendritic(x) and Inharmonic(x) -> Hammered(x))\nforall x (Stupefying(x) and Shellproof(x) -> Dendritic(x))\n\nDendritic(torrey)\n\nInharmonic(torrey) and forall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Stupefying(x)) -> therefore Stupefying(torrey) Inharmonic(torrey) and forall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Stupefying(x)) -> therefore Stupefying(torrey) Stupefying(torrey) and Stupefying(torrey) -> Shellproof(torrey) -> therefore Shellproof(torrey) Stupefying(torrey) and Shellproof(torrey) and forall x (Stupefying(x) and Shellproof(x) -> Dendritic(x)) -> therefore Dendritic(torrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Gae is venetian. Inna is rural. Inna is calcuttan. Red things are choosey. All choosey, oriented things are venetian. If something is venetian then it is calcuttan. All rural, unstylish things are venetian. All unstylish things are sentential. If Gae is calcuttan then Gae is rural. Furry, venetian things are sentential. If something is calcuttan and rural then it is unstylish. Gae is not unstylish.", "logic": "\nVenetian(gae)\nRural(inna)\nCalcuttan(inna)\nforall x (Oriented(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Oriented(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and Unstylish(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Unstylish(x) -> Sentential(x))\nCalcuttan(gae) -> Rural(gae)\nforall x (Unstylish(x) and Venetian(x) -> Sentential(x))\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) and Rural(x) -> Unstylish(x))\n\nnot Unstylish(gae)\n\nVenetian(gae) and forall x (Venetian(x) -> Calcuttan(x)) -> therefore Calcuttan(gae) Venetian(gae) and forall x (Venetian(x) -> Calcuttan(x)) -> therefore Calcuttan(gae) Calcuttan(gae) and Calcuttan(gae) -> Rural(gae) -> therefore Rural(gae) Calcuttan(gae) and Rural(gae) and forall x (Calcuttan(x) and Rural(x) -> Unstylish(x)) -> therefore Unstylish(gae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Doralia is clipped. Lizbeth is grumbling. Lizbeth is drizzling. Red things are bush. All bush, thrilling things are clipped. If something is clipped then it is drizzling. All grumbling, sinkable things are clipped. All sinkable things are lxxviii. If Doralia is drizzling then Doralia is grumbling. Furry, clipped things are lxxviii. If something is drizzling and grumbling then it is sinkable. Doralia is not bush.", "logic": "\nClipped(doralia)\nGrumbling(lizbeth)\nDrizzling(lizbeth)\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Bush(x))\nforall x (Bush(x) and Thrilling(x) -> Clipped(x))\nforall x (Clipped(x) -> Drizzling(x))\nforall x (Grumbling(x) and Sinkable(x) -> Clipped(x))\nforall x (Sinkable(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nDrizzling(doralia) -> Grumbling(doralia)\nforall x (Sinkable(x) and Clipped(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Drizzling(x) and Grumbling(x) -> Sinkable(x))\n\nnot Bush(doralia)\n\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Bush(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Gil is beaked. Dynah is piscine. Dynah is adored. Red things are ignescent. All ignescent, grainy things are beaked. If something is beaked then it is adored. All piscine, forthright things are beaked. All forthright things are statute. If Gil is adored then Gil is piscine. Furry, beaked things are statute. If something is adored and piscine then it is forthright. Dynah is ignescent.", "logic": "\nBeaked(gil)\nPiscine(dynah)\nAdored(dynah)\nforall x (Grainy(x) -> Ignescent(x))\nforall x (Ignescent(x) and Grainy(x) -> Beaked(x))\nforall x (Beaked(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Piscine(x) and Forthright(x) -> Beaked(x))\nforall x (Forthright(x) -> Statute(x))\nAdored(gil) -> Piscine(gil)\nforall x (Forthright(x) and Beaked(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Piscine(x) -> Forthright(x))\n\nIgnescent(dynah)\n\nforall x (Grainy(x) -> Ignescent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Tyson is coalesced. Shorty is hesitating. Shorty is revokable. Red things are separable. All separable, breastless things are coalesced. If something is coalesced then it is revokable. All hesitating, calico things are coalesced. All calico things are picaresque. If Tyson is revokable then Tyson is hesitating. Furry, coalesced things are picaresque. If something is revokable and hesitating then it is calico. Tyson is not breastless.", "logic": "\nCoalesced(tyson)\nHesitating(shorty)\nRevokable(shorty)\nforall x (Breastless(x) -> Separable(x))\nforall x (Separable(x) and Breastless(x) -> Coalesced(x))\nforall x (Coalesced(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Hesitating(x) and Calico(x) -> Coalesced(x))\nforall x (Calico(x) -> Picaresque(x))\nRevokable(tyson) -> Hesitating(tyson)\nforall x (Calico(x) and Coalesced(x) -> Picaresque(x))\nforall x (Revokable(x) and Hesitating(x) -> Calico(x))\n\nnot Breastless(tyson)\n\nnot Breastless(tyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Charla is interlaced. Sib is realized. Sib is anuran. Red things are acherontic. All acherontic, needless things are interlaced. If something is interlaced then it is anuran. All realized, favourable things are interlaced. All favourable things are lifelong. If Charla is anuran then Charla is realized. Furry, interlaced things are lifelong. If something is anuran and realized then it is favourable. Sib is needless.", "logic": "\nInterlaced(charla)\nRealized(sib)\nAnuran(sib)\nforall x (Needless(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Acherontic(x) and Needless(x) -> Interlaced(x))\nforall x (Interlaced(x) -> Anuran(x))\nforall x (Realized(x) and Favourable(x) -> Interlaced(x))\nforall x (Favourable(x) -> Lifelong(x))\nAnuran(charla) -> Realized(charla)\nforall x (Favourable(x) and Interlaced(x) -> Lifelong(x))\nforall x (Anuran(x) and Realized(x) -> Favourable(x))\n\nNeedless(sib)\n\nNeedless(sib) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "The wittie is bullnecked. The wittie is unlighted. The wittie is allantoid. The wittie egress the mag. The mag is scheduled. The mag is allantoid. The mag encode the callie. The mag egress the wittie. The mag egress the callie. The darya is unlighted. The darya encode the wittie. The callie thatch the wittie. If something encode the mag then it thatch the darya. If something thatch the wittie and it encode the callie then the callie is allantoid. If the mag encode the wittie and the wittie encode the darya then the wittie egress the mag. If something egress the darya then it thatch the wittie. If something is scheduled then it egress the darya. If something encode the callie and the callie egress the wittie then it egress the darya. The mag is allantoid.", "logic": "\nBullnecked(wittie)\nUnlighted(wittie)\nAllantoid(wittie)\nEgress(wittie, mag)\nScheduled(mag)\nAllantoid(mag)\nEncode(mag, callie)\nEgress(mag, wittie)\nEgress(mag, callie)\nUnlighted(darya)\nEncode(darya, wittie)\nThatch(callie, wittie)\nforall x (Encode(x, mag) -> Thatch(x, darya))\nforall x (Thatch(x, wittie) and Encode(x, callie) -> Allantoid(callie))\nEncode(mag, wittie) and Encode(wittie, darya) -> Egress(wittie, mag)\nforall x (Egress(x, darya) -> Thatch(x, wittie))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Egress(x, darya))\nforall x (Encode(x, callie) and Egress(callie, wittie) -> Egress(x, darya))\n\nAllantoid(mag)\n\ntherefore Allantoid(mag)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The ambrosia is forged. The ambrosia is yearlong. The ambrosia is agrologic. The ambrosia swan the venita. The venita is unpackaged. The venita is agrologic. The venita stifle the carmelia. The venita swan the ambrosia. The venita swan the carmelia. The dani is yearlong. The dani stifle the ambrosia. The carmelia delimitate the ambrosia. If something stifle the venita then it delimitate the dani. If something delimitate the ambrosia and it stifle the carmelia then the carmelia is agrologic. If the venita stifle the ambrosia and the ambrosia stifle the dani then the ambrosia swan the venita. If something swan the dani then it delimitate the ambrosia. If something is unpackaged then it swan the dani. If something stifle the carmelia and the carmelia swan the ambrosia then it swan the dani. The venita does not visit the ambrosia.", "logic": "\nForged(ambrosia)\nYearlong(ambrosia)\nAgrologic(ambrosia)\nSwan(ambrosia, venita)\nUnpackaged(venita)\nAgrologic(venita)\nStifle(venita, carmelia)\nSwan(venita, ambrosia)\nSwan(venita, carmelia)\nYearlong(dani)\nStifle(dani, ambrosia)\nDelimitate(carmelia, ambrosia)\nforall x (Stifle(x, venita) -> Delimitate(x, dani))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, ambrosia) and Stifle(x, carmelia) -> Agrologic(carmelia))\nStifle(venita, ambrosia) and Stifle(ambrosia, dani) -> Swan(ambrosia, venita)\nforall x (Swan(x, dani) -> Delimitate(x, ambrosia))\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Swan(x, dani))\nforall x (Stifle(x, carmelia) and Swan(carmelia, ambrosia) -> Swan(x, dani))\n\nnot Swan(venita, ambrosia)\n\ntherefore Swan(venita, ambrosia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The adrienne is venetian. The adrienne is disguised. The adrienne is possessive. The adrienne scissor the aurlie. The aurlie is fourscore. The aurlie is possessive. The aurlie mature the deonne. The aurlie scissor the adrienne. The aurlie scissor the deonne. The honey is disguised. The honey mature the adrienne. The deonne roast the adrienne. If something mature the aurlie then it roast the honey. If something roast the adrienne and it mature the deonne then the deonne is possessive. If the aurlie mature the adrienne and the adrienne mature the honey then the adrienne scissor the aurlie. If something scissor the honey then it roast the adrienne. If something is fourscore then it scissor the honey. If something mature the deonne and the deonne scissor the adrienne then it scissor the honey. The aurlie scissor the honey.", "logic": "\nVenetian(adrienne)\nDisguised(adrienne)\nPossessive(adrienne)\nScissor(adrienne, aurlie)\nFourscore(aurlie)\nPossessive(aurlie)\nMature(aurlie, deonne)\nScissor(aurlie, adrienne)\nScissor(aurlie, deonne)\nDisguised(honey)\nMature(honey, adrienne)\nRoast(deonne, adrienne)\nforall x (Mature(x, aurlie) -> Roast(x, honey))\nforall x (Roast(x, adrienne) and Mature(x, deonne) -> Possessive(deonne))\nMature(aurlie, adrienne) and Mature(adrienne, honey) -> Scissor(adrienne, aurlie)\nforall x (Scissor(x, honey) -> Roast(x, adrienne))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) -> Scissor(x, honey))\nforall x (Mature(x, deonne) and Scissor(deonne, adrienne) -> Scissor(x, honey))\n\nScissor(aurlie, honey)\n\nFourscore(aurlie) and forall x (Fourscore(x) -> Scissor(x, honey)) -> therefore Scissor(aurlie, honey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The shel is comely. The shel is huxleian. The shel is unvigilant. The shel chisel the ania. The ania is beechen. The ania is unvigilant. The ania course the koren. The ania chisel the shel. The ania chisel the koren. The stanwood is huxleian. The stanwood course the shel. The koren blackball the shel. If something course the ania then it blackball the stanwood. If something blackball the shel and it course the koren then the koren is unvigilant. If the ania course the shel and the shel course the stanwood then the shel chisel the ania. If something chisel the stanwood then it blackball the shel. If something is beechen then it chisel the stanwood. If something course the koren and the koren chisel the shel then it chisel the stanwood. The ania does not visit the stanwood.", "logic": "\nComely(shel)\nHuxleian(shel)\nUnvigilant(shel)\nChisel(shel, ania)\nBeechen(ania)\nUnvigilant(ania)\nCourse(ania, koren)\nChisel(ania, shel)\nChisel(ania, koren)\nHuxleian(stanwood)\nCourse(stanwood, shel)\nBlackball(koren, shel)\nforall x (Course(x, ania) -> Blackball(x, stanwood))\nforall x (Blackball(x, shel) and Course(x, koren) -> Unvigilant(koren))\nCourse(ania, shel) and Course(shel, stanwood) -> Chisel(shel, ania)\nforall x (Chisel(x, stanwood) -> Blackball(x, shel))\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> Chisel(x, stanwood))\nforall x (Course(x, koren) and Chisel(koren, shel) -> Chisel(x, stanwood))\n\nnot Chisel(ania, stanwood)\n\nBeechen(ania) and forall x (Beechen(x) -> Chisel(x, stanwood)) -> therefore Chisel(ania, stanwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The liam is ellipsoid. The liam is unsugared. The liam is diffusive. The liam canker the ilysa. The ilysa is thwarting. The ilysa is diffusive. The ilysa irradiate the shaina. The ilysa canker the liam. The ilysa canker the shaina. The salvidor is unsugared. The salvidor irradiate the liam. The shaina exhale the liam. If something irradiate the ilysa then it exhale the salvidor. If something exhale the liam and it irradiate the shaina then the shaina is diffusive. If the ilysa irradiate the liam and the liam irradiate the salvidor then the liam canker the ilysa. If something canker the salvidor then it exhale the liam. If something is thwarting then it canker the salvidor. If something irradiate the shaina and the shaina canker the liam then it canker the salvidor. The ilysa exhale the liam.", "logic": "\nEllipsoid(liam)\nUnsugared(liam)\nDiffusive(liam)\nCanker(liam, ilysa)\nThwarting(ilysa)\nDiffusive(ilysa)\nIrradiate(ilysa, shaina)\nCanker(ilysa, liam)\nCanker(ilysa, shaina)\nUnsugared(salvidor)\nIrradiate(salvidor, liam)\nExhale(shaina, liam)\nforall x (Irradiate(x, ilysa) -> Exhale(x, salvidor))\nforall x (Exhale(x, liam) and Irradiate(x, shaina) -> Diffusive(shaina))\nIrradiate(ilysa, liam) and Irradiate(liam, salvidor) -> Canker(liam, ilysa)\nforall x (Canker(x, salvidor) -> Exhale(x, liam))\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Canker(x, salvidor))\nforall x (Irradiate(x, shaina) and Canker(shaina, liam) -> Canker(x, salvidor))\n\nExhale(ilysa, liam)\n\nThwarting(ilysa) and forall x (Thwarting(x) -> Canker(x, salvidor)) -> therefore Canker(ilysa, salvidor) Canker(ilysa, salvidor) and forall x (Canker(x, salvidor) -> Exhale(x, liam)) -> therefore Exhale(ilysa, liam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The meggie is unreliable. The meggie is newsy. The meggie is resentful. The meggie redouble the allison. The allison is veridical. The allison is resentful. The allison brine the pablo. The allison redouble the meggie. The allison redouble the pablo. The austina is newsy. The austina brine the meggie. The pablo pepper the meggie. If something brine the allison then it pepper the austina. If something pepper the meggie and it brine the pablo then the pablo is resentful. If the allison brine the meggie and the meggie brine the austina then the meggie redouble the allison. If something redouble the austina then it pepper the meggie. If something is veridical then it redouble the austina. If something brine the pablo and the pablo redouble the meggie then it redouble the austina. The allison does not see the meggie.", "logic": "\nUnreliable(meggie)\nNewsy(meggie)\nResentful(meggie)\nRedouble(meggie, allison)\nVeridical(allison)\nResentful(allison)\nBrine(allison, pablo)\nRedouble(allison, meggie)\nRedouble(allison, pablo)\nNewsy(austina)\nBrine(austina, meggie)\nPepper(pablo, meggie)\nforall x (Brine(x, allison) -> Pepper(x, austina))\nforall x (Pepper(x, meggie) and Brine(x, pablo) -> Resentful(pablo))\nBrine(allison, meggie) and Brine(meggie, austina) -> Redouble(meggie, allison)\nforall x (Redouble(x, austina) -> Pepper(x, meggie))\nforall x (Veridical(x) -> Redouble(x, austina))\nforall x (Brine(x, pablo) and Redouble(pablo, meggie) -> Redouble(x, austina))\n\nnot Pepper(allison, meggie)\n\nVeridical(allison) and forall x (Veridical(x) -> Redouble(x, austina)) -> therefore Redouble(allison, austina) Redouble(allison, austina) and forall x (Redouble(x, austina) -> Pepper(x, meggie)) -> therefore Pepper(allison, meggie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The madelina is windward. The madelina is bestial. The madelina is bitumenoid. The madelina razz the rayner. The rayner is sage. The rayner is bitumenoid. The rayner inhere the parry. The rayner razz the madelina. The rayner razz the parry. The pamela is bestial. The pamela inhere the madelina. The parry nurture the madelina. If something inhere the rayner then it nurture the pamela. If something nurture the madelina and it inhere the parry then the parry is bitumenoid. If the rayner inhere the madelina and the madelina inhere the pamela then the madelina razz the rayner. If something razz the pamela then it nurture the madelina. If something is sage then it razz the pamela. If something inhere the parry and the parry razz the madelina then it razz the pamela. The parry is bitumenoid.", "logic": "\nWindward(madelina)\nBestial(madelina)\nBitumenoid(madelina)\nRazz(madelina, rayner)\nSage(rayner)\nBitumenoid(rayner)\nInhere(rayner, parry)\nRazz(rayner, madelina)\nRazz(rayner, parry)\nBestial(pamela)\nInhere(pamela, madelina)\nNurture(parry, madelina)\nforall x (Inhere(x, rayner) -> Nurture(x, pamela))\nforall x (Nurture(x, madelina) and Inhere(x, parry) -> Bitumenoid(parry))\nInhere(rayner, madelina) and Inhere(madelina, pamela) -> Razz(madelina, rayner)\nforall x (Razz(x, pamela) -> Nurture(x, madelina))\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Razz(x, pamela))\nforall x (Inhere(x, parry) and Razz(parry, madelina) -> Razz(x, pamela))\n\nBitumenoid(parry)\n\nSage(rayner) and forall x (Sage(x) -> Razz(x, pamela)) -> therefore Razz(rayner, pamela) Razz(rayner, pamela) and forall x (Razz(x, pamela) -> Nurture(x, madelina)) -> therefore Nurture(rayner, madelina) Nurture(rayner, madelina) and Inhere(rayner, parry) and forall x (Nurture(x, madelina) and Inhere(x, parry) -> Bitumenoid(parry)) -> therefore Bitumenoid(parry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The wendie is inhabited. The wendie is unportable. The wendie is eulogistic. The wendie nullify the gino. The gino is existing. The gino is eulogistic. The gino presage the mohan. The gino nullify the wendie. The gino nullify the mohan. The park is unportable. The park presage the wendie. The mohan weather the wendie. If something presage the gino then it weather the park. If something weather the wendie and it presage the mohan then the mohan is eulogistic. If the gino presage the wendie and the wendie presage the park then the wendie nullify the gino. If something nullify the park then it weather the wendie. If something is existing then it nullify the park. If something presage the mohan and the mohan nullify the wendie then it nullify the park. The mohan is not eulogistic.", "logic": "\nInhabited(wendie)\nUnportable(wendie)\nEulogistic(wendie)\nNullify(wendie, gino)\nExisting(gino)\nEulogistic(gino)\nPresage(gino, mohan)\nNullify(gino, wendie)\nNullify(gino, mohan)\nUnportable(park)\nPresage(park, wendie)\nWeather(mohan, wendie)\nforall x (Presage(x, gino) -> Weather(x, park))\nforall x (Weather(x, wendie) and Presage(x, mohan) -> Eulogistic(mohan))\nPresage(gino, wendie) and Presage(wendie, park) -> Nullify(wendie, gino)\nforall x (Nullify(x, park) -> Weather(x, wendie))\nforall x (Existing(x) -> Nullify(x, park))\nforall x (Presage(x, mohan) and Nullify(mohan, wendie) -> Nullify(x, park))\n\nnot Eulogistic(mohan)\n\nExisting(gino) and forall x (Existing(x) -> Nullify(x, park)) -> therefore Nullify(gino, park) Nullify(gino, park) and forall x (Nullify(x, park) -> Weather(x, wendie)) -> therefore Weather(gino, wendie) Weather(gino, wendie) and Presage(gino, mohan) and forall x (Weather(x, wendie) and Presage(x, mohan) -> Eulogistic(mohan)) -> therefore Eulogistic(mohan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The mariya is disabused. The mariya is hearing. The mariya is ascosporic. The mariya molt the gladi. The gladi is untrodden. The gladi is ascosporic. The gladi alienate the mohammad. The gladi molt the mariya. The gladi molt the mohammad. The guthry is hearing. The guthry alienate the mariya. The mohammad hill the mariya. If something alienate the gladi then it hill the guthry. If something hill the mariya and it alienate the mohammad then the mohammad is ascosporic. If the gladi alienate the mariya and the mariya alienate the guthry then the mariya molt the gladi. If something molt the guthry then it hill the mariya. If something is untrodden then it molt the guthry. If something alienate the mohammad and the mohammad molt the mariya then it molt the guthry. The guthry does not see the mariya.", "logic": "\nDisabused(mariya)\nHearing(mariya)\nAscosporic(mariya)\nMolt(mariya, gladi)\nUntrodden(gladi)\nAscosporic(gladi)\nAlienate(gladi, mohammad)\nMolt(gladi, mariya)\nMolt(gladi, mohammad)\nHearing(guthry)\nAlienate(guthry, mariya)\nHill(mohammad, mariya)\nforall x (Alienate(x, gladi) -> Hill(x, guthry))\nforall x (Hill(x, mariya) and Alienate(x, mohammad) -> Ascosporic(mohammad))\nAlienate(gladi, mariya) and Alienate(mariya, guthry) -> Molt(mariya, gladi)\nforall x (Molt(x, guthry) -> Hill(x, mariya))\nforall x (Untrodden(x) -> Molt(x, guthry))\nforall x (Alienate(x, mohammad) and Molt(mohammad, mariya) -> Molt(x, guthry))\n\nnot Hill(guthry, mariya)\n\nforall x (Molt(x, guthry) -> Hill(x, mariya)) <- forall x (Untrodden(x) -> Molt(x, guthry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The brear is silverish. The brear is unselfish. The brear is thin. The brear code the son. The son is spacious. The son is thin. The son satirise the hodge. The son code the brear. The son code the hodge. The merrill is unselfish. The merrill satirise the brear. The hodge praise the brear. If something satirise the son then it praise the merrill. If something praise the brear and it satirise the hodge then the hodge is thin. If the son satirise the brear and the brear satirise the merrill then the brear code the son. If something code the merrill then it praise the brear. If something is spacious then it code the merrill. If something satirise the hodge and the hodge code the brear then it code the merrill. The brear praise the merrill.", "logic": "\nSilverish(brear)\nUnselfish(brear)\nThin(brear)\nCode(brear, son)\nSpacious(son)\nThin(son)\nSatirise(son, hodge)\nCode(son, brear)\nCode(son, hodge)\nUnselfish(merrill)\nSatirise(merrill, brear)\nPraise(hodge, brear)\nforall x (Satirise(x, son) -> Praise(x, merrill))\nforall x (Praise(x, brear) and Satirise(x, hodge) -> Thin(hodge))\nSatirise(son, brear) and Satirise(brear, merrill) -> Code(brear, son)\nforall x (Code(x, merrill) -> Praise(x, brear))\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> Code(x, merrill))\nforall x (Satirise(x, hodge) and Code(hodge, brear) -> Code(x, merrill))\n\nPraise(brear, merrill)\n\nforall x (Satirise(x, son) -> Praise(x, merrill)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The sollie is edentulate. The sollie is iraki. The sollie is calcaneal. The sollie iterate the kristian. The kristian is wretched. The kristian is calcaneal. The kristian roughhouse the noemi. The kristian iterate the sollie. The kristian iterate the noemi. The belia is iraki. The belia roughhouse the sollie. The noemi protract the sollie. If something roughhouse the kristian then it protract the belia. If something protract the sollie and it roughhouse the noemi then the noemi is calcaneal. If the kristian roughhouse the sollie and the sollie roughhouse the belia then the sollie iterate the kristian. If something iterate the belia then it protract the sollie. If something is wretched then it iterate the belia. If something roughhouse the noemi and the noemi iterate the sollie then it iterate the belia. The noemi does not visit the belia.", "logic": "\nEdentulate(sollie)\nIraki(sollie)\nCalcaneal(sollie)\nIterate(sollie, kristian)\nWretched(kristian)\nCalcaneal(kristian)\nRoughhouse(kristian, noemi)\nIterate(kristian, sollie)\nIterate(kristian, noemi)\nIraki(belia)\nRoughhouse(belia, sollie)\nProtract(noemi, sollie)\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, kristian) -> Protract(x, belia))\nforall x (Protract(x, sollie) and Roughhouse(x, noemi) -> Calcaneal(noemi))\nRoughhouse(kristian, sollie) and Roughhouse(sollie, belia) -> Iterate(sollie, kristian)\nforall x (Iterate(x, belia) -> Protract(x, sollie))\nforall x (Wretched(x) -> Iterate(x, belia))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, noemi) and Iterate(noemi, sollie) -> Iterate(x, belia))\n\nnot Iterate(noemi, belia)\n\nforall x (Wretched(x) -> Iterate(x, belia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The virgil is ohmic. The virgil is sinitic. The virgil is staccato. The virgil quench the toddy. The toddy is pillaged. The toddy is staccato. The toddy defuse the brodie. The toddy quench the virgil. The toddy quench the brodie. The meagan is sinitic. The meagan defuse the virgil. The brodie substitute the virgil. If something defuse the toddy then it substitute the meagan. If something substitute the virgil and it defuse the brodie then the brodie is staccato. If the toddy defuse the virgil and the virgil defuse the meagan then the virgil quench the toddy. If something quench the meagan then it substitute the virgil. If something is pillaged then it quench the meagan. If something defuse the brodie and the brodie quench the virgil then it quench the meagan. The meagan substitute the meagan.", "logic": "\nOhmic(virgil)\nSinitic(virgil)\nStaccato(virgil)\nQuench(virgil, toddy)\nPillaged(toddy)\nStaccato(toddy)\nDefuse(toddy, brodie)\nQuench(toddy, virgil)\nQuench(toddy, brodie)\nSinitic(meagan)\nDefuse(meagan, virgil)\nSubstitute(brodie, virgil)\nforall x (Defuse(x, toddy) -> Substitute(x, meagan))\nforall x (Substitute(x, virgil) and Defuse(x, brodie) -> Staccato(brodie))\nDefuse(toddy, virgil) and Defuse(virgil, meagan) -> Quench(virgil, toddy)\nforall x (Quench(x, meagan) -> Substitute(x, virgil))\nforall x (Pillaged(x) -> Quench(x, meagan))\nforall x (Defuse(x, brodie) and Quench(brodie, virgil) -> Quench(x, meagan))\n\nSubstitute(meagan, meagan)\n\nforall x (Defuse(x, toddy) -> Substitute(x, meagan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The giovanna is talismanic. The giovanna is fatuous. The giovanna is slain. The giovanna trademark the antony. The antony is exclusive. The antony is slain. The antony flap the merlina. The antony trademark the giovanna. The antony trademark the merlina. The rici is fatuous. The rici flap the giovanna. The merlina charter the giovanna. If something flap the antony then it charter the rici. If something charter the giovanna and it flap the merlina then the merlina is slain. If the antony flap the giovanna and the giovanna flap the rici then the giovanna trademark the antony. If something trademark the rici then it charter the giovanna. If something is exclusive then it trademark the rici. If something flap the merlina and the merlina trademark the giovanna then it trademark the rici. The merlina is not nice.", "logic": "\nTalismanic(giovanna)\nFatuous(giovanna)\nSlain(giovanna)\nTrademark(giovanna, antony)\nExclusive(antony)\nSlain(antony)\nFlap(antony, merlina)\nTrademark(antony, giovanna)\nTrademark(antony, merlina)\nFatuous(rici)\nFlap(rici, giovanna)\nCharter(merlina, giovanna)\nforall x (Flap(x, antony) -> Charter(x, rici))\nforall x (Charter(x, giovanna) and Flap(x, merlina) -> Slain(merlina))\nFlap(antony, giovanna) and Flap(giovanna, rici) -> Trademark(giovanna, antony)\nforall x (Trademark(x, rici) -> Charter(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) -> Trademark(x, rici))\nforall x (Flap(x, merlina) and Trademark(merlina, giovanna) -> Trademark(x, rici))\n\nnot Nice(merlina)\n\nnot Nice(merlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The ardine is seamanly. The ardine is bedimmed. The ardine is cogent. The ardine whittle the emelda. The emelda is terete. The emelda is cogent. The emelda kowtow the christina. The emelda whittle the ardine. The emelda whittle the christina. The doreen is bedimmed. The doreen kowtow the ardine. The christina hare the ardine. If something kowtow the emelda then it hare the doreen. If something hare the ardine and it kowtow the christina then the christina is cogent. If the emelda kowtow the ardine and the ardine kowtow the doreen then the ardine whittle the emelda. If something whittle the doreen then it hare the ardine. If something is terete then it whittle the doreen. If something kowtow the christina and the christina whittle the ardine then it whittle the doreen. The ardine kowtow the emelda.", "logic": "\nSeamanly(ardine)\nBedimmed(ardine)\nCogent(ardine)\nWhittle(ardine, emelda)\nTerete(emelda)\nCogent(emelda)\nKowtow(emelda, christina)\nWhittle(emelda, ardine)\nWhittle(emelda, christina)\nBedimmed(doreen)\nKowtow(doreen, ardine)\nHare(christina, ardine)\nforall x (Kowtow(x, emelda) -> Hare(x, doreen))\nforall x (Hare(x, ardine) and Kowtow(x, christina) -> Cogent(christina))\nKowtow(emelda, ardine) and Kowtow(ardine, doreen) -> Whittle(ardine, emelda)\nforall x (Whittle(x, doreen) -> Hare(x, ardine))\nforall x (Terete(x) -> Whittle(x, doreen))\nforall x (Kowtow(x, christina) and Whittle(christina, ardine) -> Whittle(x, doreen))\n\nKowtow(ardine, emelda)\n\nKowtow(ardine, emelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The mike is fringed. The mike is damp. The mike is helical. The mike list the janeczka. The janeczka is steadied. The janeczka is helical. The janeczka howl the cletus. The janeczka list the mike. The janeczka list the cletus. The hammad is damp. The hammad howl the mike. The cletus jumble the mike. If something howl the janeczka then it jumble the hammad. If something jumble the mike and it howl the cletus then the cletus is helical. If the janeczka howl the mike and the mike howl the hammad then the mike list the janeczka. If something list the hammad then it jumble the mike. If something is steadied then it list the hammad. If something howl the cletus and the cletus list the mike then it list the hammad. The mike does not need the mike.", "logic": "\nFringed(mike)\nDamp(mike)\nHelical(mike)\nList(mike, janeczka)\nSteadied(janeczka)\nHelical(janeczka)\nHowl(janeczka, cletus)\nList(janeczka, mike)\nList(janeczka, cletus)\nDamp(hammad)\nHowl(hammad, mike)\nJumble(cletus, mike)\nforall x (Howl(x, janeczka) -> Jumble(x, hammad))\nforall x (Jumble(x, mike) and Howl(x, cletus) -> Helical(cletus))\nHowl(janeczka, mike) and Howl(mike, hammad) -> List(mike, janeczka)\nforall x (List(x, hammad) -> Jumble(x, mike))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> List(x, hammad))\nforall x (Howl(x, cletus) and List(cletus, mike) -> List(x, hammad))\n\nnot Howl(mike, mike)\n\nnot Howl(mike, mike) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The ara is parhelic. The ara is possessed. The ara is screechy. The ara disregard the berenice. The berenice is undershot. The berenice is screechy. The berenice assimilate the theodoric. The berenice disregard the ara. The berenice disregard the theodoric. The lotti is possessed. The lotti assimilate the ara. The theodoric preface the ara. If something assimilate the berenice then it preface the lotti. If something preface the ara and it assimilate the theodoric then the theodoric is screechy. If the berenice assimilate the ara and the ara assimilate the lotti then the ara disregard the berenice. If something disregard the lotti then it preface the ara. If something is undershot then it disregard the lotti. If something assimilate the theodoric and the theodoric disregard the ara then it disregard the lotti. The theodoric is undershot.", "logic": "\nParhelic(ara)\nPossessed(ara)\nScreechy(ara)\nDisregard(ara, berenice)\nUndershot(berenice)\nScreechy(berenice)\nAssimilate(berenice, theodoric)\nDisregard(berenice, ara)\nDisregard(berenice, theodoric)\nPossessed(lotti)\nAssimilate(lotti, ara)\nPreface(theodoric, ara)\nforall x (Assimilate(x, berenice) -> Preface(x, lotti))\nforall x (Preface(x, ara) and Assimilate(x, theodoric) -> Screechy(theodoric))\nAssimilate(berenice, ara) and Assimilate(ara, lotti) -> Disregard(ara, berenice)\nforall x (Disregard(x, lotti) -> Preface(x, ara))\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> Disregard(x, lotti))\nforall x (Assimilate(x, theodoric) and Disregard(theodoric, ara) -> Disregard(x, lotti))\n\nUndershot(theodoric)\n\nUndershot(theodoric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "Zach is bestubbled. Zach is rudderless. Zach is skint. Zach is loamless. Zach is glassed. Ronica is humbling. Ronica is loamless. Round things are evidential. If Ronica is skint then Ronica is rudderless. If something is loamless and glassed then it is bestubbled. Furry things are loamless. All humbling, bestubbled things are loamless. If Ronica is rudderless then Ronica is glassed. If Ronica is humbling then Ronica is rudderless. If Ronica is loamless and Ronica is evidential then Ronica is skint. Zach is bestubbled.", "logic": "\nBestubbled(zach)\nRudderless(zach)\nSkint(zach)\nLoamless(zach)\nGlassed(zach)\nHumbling(ronica)\nLoamless(ronica)\nforall x (Skint(x) -> Evidential(x))\nSkint(ronica) -> Rudderless(ronica)\nforall x (Loamless(x) and Glassed(x) -> Bestubbled(x))\nforall x (Rudderless(x) -> Loamless(x))\nforall x (Humbling(x) and Bestubbled(x) -> Loamless(x))\nRudderless(ronica) -> Glassed(ronica)\nHumbling(ronica) -> Rudderless(ronica)\nLoamless(ronica) and Evidential(ronica) -> Skint(ronica)\n\nBestubbled(zach)\n\ntherefore Bestubbled(zach)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Dunc is confirmed. Dunc is unpassable. Dunc is betrothed. Dunc is awny. Dunc is upended. Jany is hanoverian. Jany is awny. Round things are unprovoked. If Jany is betrothed then Jany is unpassable. If something is awny and upended then it is confirmed. Furry things are awny. All hanoverian, confirmed things are awny. If Jany is unpassable then Jany is upended. If Jany is hanoverian then Jany is unpassable. If Jany is awny and Jany is unprovoked then Jany is betrothed. Dunc is not upended.", "logic": "\nConfirmed(dunc)\nUnpassable(dunc)\nBetrothed(dunc)\nAwny(dunc)\nUpended(dunc)\nHanoverian(jany)\nAwny(jany)\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Unprovoked(x))\nBetrothed(jany) -> Unpassable(jany)\nforall x (Awny(x) and Upended(x) -> Confirmed(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> Awny(x))\nforall x (Hanoverian(x) and Confirmed(x) -> Awny(x))\nUnpassable(jany) -> Upended(jany)\nHanoverian(jany) -> Unpassable(jany)\nAwny(jany) and Unprovoked(jany) -> Betrothed(jany)\n\nnot Upended(dunc)\n\ntherefore Upended(dunc)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Corny is unwomanly. Corny is blocked. Corny is excitable. Corny is guiding. Corny is unrouged. Zarah is senile. Zarah is guiding. Round things are legion. If Zarah is excitable then Zarah is blocked. If something is guiding and unrouged then it is unwomanly. Furry things are guiding. All senile, unwomanly things are guiding. If Zarah is blocked then Zarah is unrouged. If Zarah is senile then Zarah is blocked. If Zarah is guiding and Zarah is legion then Zarah is excitable. Corny is legion.", "logic": "\nUnwomanly(corny)\nBlocked(corny)\nExcitable(corny)\nGuiding(corny)\nUnrouged(corny)\nSenile(zarah)\nGuiding(zarah)\nforall x (Excitable(x) -> Legion(x))\nExcitable(zarah) -> Blocked(zarah)\nforall x (Guiding(x) and Unrouged(x) -> Unwomanly(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Guiding(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) and Unwomanly(x) -> Guiding(x))\nBlocked(zarah) -> Unrouged(zarah)\nSenile(zarah) -> Blocked(zarah)\nGuiding(zarah) and Legion(zarah) -> Excitable(zarah)\n\nLegion(corny)\n\nExcitable(corny) and forall x (Excitable(x) -> Legion(x)) -> therefore Legion(corny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Lucienne is fahrenheit. Lucienne is made. Lucienne is assistive. Lucienne is tortured. Lucienne is cereal. Raymundo is schoolwide. Raymundo is tortured. Round things are extendible. If Raymundo is assistive then Raymundo is made. If something is tortured and cereal then it is fahrenheit. Furry things are tortured. All schoolwide, fahrenheit things are tortured. If Raymundo is made then Raymundo is cereal. If Raymundo is schoolwide then Raymundo is made. If Raymundo is tortured and Raymundo is extendible then Raymundo is assistive. Lucienne is not extendible.", "logic": "\nFahrenheit(lucienne)\nMade(lucienne)\nAssistive(lucienne)\nTortured(lucienne)\nCereal(lucienne)\nSchoolwide(raymundo)\nTortured(raymundo)\nforall x (Assistive(x) -> Extendible(x))\nAssistive(raymundo) -> Made(raymundo)\nforall x (Tortured(x) and Cereal(x) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nforall x (Made(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Schoolwide(x) and Fahrenheit(x) -> Tortured(x))\nMade(raymundo) -> Cereal(raymundo)\nSchoolwide(raymundo) -> Made(raymundo)\nTortured(raymundo) and Extendible(raymundo) -> Assistive(raymundo)\n\nnot Extendible(lucienne)\n\nAssistive(lucienne) and forall x (Assistive(x) -> Extendible(x)) -> therefore Extendible(lucienne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Nannette is bilabial. Nannette is accursed. Nannette is comradely. Nannette is saurian. Nannette is valorous. Jacintha is prevailing. Jacintha is saurian. Round things are latish. If Jacintha is comradely then Jacintha is accursed. If something is saurian and valorous then it is bilabial. Furry things are saurian. All prevailing, bilabial things are saurian. If Jacintha is accursed then Jacintha is valorous. If Jacintha is prevailing then Jacintha is accursed. If Jacintha is saurian and Jacintha is latish then Jacintha is comradely. Jacintha is valorous.", "logic": "\nBilabial(nannette)\nAccursed(nannette)\nComradely(nannette)\nSaurian(nannette)\nValorous(nannette)\nPrevailing(jacintha)\nSaurian(jacintha)\nforall x (Comradely(x) -> Latish(x))\nComradely(jacintha) -> Accursed(jacintha)\nforall x (Saurian(x) and Valorous(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Prevailing(x) and Bilabial(x) -> Saurian(x))\nAccursed(jacintha) -> Valorous(jacintha)\nPrevailing(jacintha) -> Accursed(jacintha)\nSaurian(jacintha) and Latish(jacintha) -> Comradely(jacintha)\n\nValorous(jacintha)\n\nPrevailing(jacintha) and Prevailing(jacintha) -> Accursed(jacintha) -> therefore Accursed(jacintha) Accursed(jacintha) and Accursed(jacintha) -> Valorous(jacintha) -> therefore Valorous(jacintha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Valaree is uncouth. Valaree is ignoble. Valaree is bacillary. Valaree is pursued. Valaree is much. Arvind is arthritic. Arvind is pursued. Round things are scalar. If Arvind is bacillary then Arvind is ignoble. If something is pursued and much then it is uncouth. Furry things are pursued. All arthritic, uncouth things are pursued. If Arvind is ignoble then Arvind is much. If Arvind is arthritic then Arvind is ignoble. If Arvind is pursued and Arvind is scalar then Arvind is bacillary. Arvind is not much.", "logic": "\nUncouth(valaree)\nIgnoble(valaree)\nBacillary(valaree)\nPursued(valaree)\nMuch(valaree)\nArthritic(arvind)\nPursued(arvind)\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Scalar(x))\nBacillary(arvind) -> Ignoble(arvind)\nforall x (Pursued(x) and Much(x) -> Uncouth(x))\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Pursued(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and Uncouth(x) -> Pursued(x))\nIgnoble(arvind) -> Much(arvind)\nArthritic(arvind) -> Ignoble(arvind)\nPursued(arvind) and Scalar(arvind) -> Bacillary(arvind)\n\nnot Much(arvind)\n\nArthritic(arvind) and Arthritic(arvind) -> Ignoble(arvind) -> therefore Ignoble(arvind) Ignoble(arvind) and Ignoble(arvind) -> Much(arvind) -> therefore Much(arvind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Rosie is merging. Rosie is faecal. Rosie is throbbing. Rosie is thoriated. Rosie is uniform. Nola is careful. Nola is thoriated. Round things are adulterant. If Nola is throbbing then Nola is faecal. If something is thoriated and uniform then it is merging. Furry things are thoriated. All careful, merging things are thoriated. If Nola is faecal then Nola is uniform. If Nola is careful then Nola is faecal. If Nola is thoriated and Nola is adulterant then Nola is throbbing. Nola is merging.", "logic": "\nMerging(rosie)\nFaecal(rosie)\nThrobbing(rosie)\nThoriated(rosie)\nUniform(rosie)\nCareful(nola)\nThoriated(nola)\nforall x (Throbbing(x) -> Adulterant(x))\nThrobbing(nola) -> Faecal(nola)\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Uniform(x) -> Merging(x))\nforall x (Faecal(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nforall x (Careful(x) and Merging(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nFaecal(nola) -> Uniform(nola)\nCareful(nola) -> Faecal(nola)\nThoriated(nola) and Adulterant(nola) -> Throbbing(nola)\n\nMerging(nola)\n\nCareful(nola) and Careful(nola) -> Faecal(nola) -> therefore Faecal(nola) Faecal(nola) and Faecal(nola) -> Uniform(nola) -> therefore Uniform(nola) Thoriated(nola) and Uniform(nola) and forall x (Thoriated(x) and Uniform(x) -> Merging(x)) -> therefore Merging(nola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Carita is nacreous. Carita is abuzz. Carita is economic. Carita is beneficed. Carita is faustian. Marjorie is isotropous. Marjorie is beneficed. Round things are lowest. If Marjorie is economic then Marjorie is abuzz. If something is beneficed and faustian then it is nacreous. Furry things are beneficed. All isotropous, nacreous things are beneficed. If Marjorie is abuzz then Marjorie is faustian. If Marjorie is isotropous then Marjorie is abuzz. If Marjorie is beneficed and Marjorie is lowest then Marjorie is economic. Marjorie is not nacreous.", "logic": "\nNacreous(carita)\nAbuzz(carita)\nEconomic(carita)\nBeneficed(carita)\nFaustian(carita)\nIsotropous(marjorie)\nBeneficed(marjorie)\nforall x (Economic(x) -> Lowest(x))\nEconomic(marjorie) -> Abuzz(marjorie)\nforall x (Beneficed(x) and Faustian(x) -> Nacreous(x))\nforall x (Abuzz(x) -> Beneficed(x))\nforall x (Isotropous(x) and Nacreous(x) -> Beneficed(x))\nAbuzz(marjorie) -> Faustian(marjorie)\nIsotropous(marjorie) -> Abuzz(marjorie)\nBeneficed(marjorie) and Lowest(marjorie) -> Economic(marjorie)\n\nnot Nacreous(marjorie)\n\nIsotropous(marjorie) and Isotropous(marjorie) -> Abuzz(marjorie) -> therefore Abuzz(marjorie) Abuzz(marjorie) and Abuzz(marjorie) -> Faustian(marjorie) -> therefore Faustian(marjorie) Beneficed(marjorie) and Faustian(marjorie) and forall x (Beneficed(x) and Faustian(x) -> Nacreous(x)) -> therefore Nacreous(marjorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Tamarah is asphaltic. Tamarah is knotted. Tamarah is declarable. Tamarah is clogging. Tamarah is vast. Tristan is vague. Tristan is clogging. Round things are exculpated. If Tristan is declarable then Tristan is knotted. If something is clogging and vast then it is asphaltic. Furry things are clogging. All vague, asphaltic things are clogging. If Tristan is knotted then Tristan is vast. If Tristan is vague then Tristan is knotted. If Tristan is clogging and Tristan is exculpated then Tristan is declarable. Tristan is not declarable.", "logic": "\nAsphaltic(tamarah)\nKnotted(tamarah)\nDeclarable(tamarah)\nClogging(tamarah)\nVast(tamarah)\nVague(tristan)\nClogging(tristan)\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Exculpated(x))\nDeclarable(tristan) -> Knotted(tristan)\nforall x (Clogging(x) and Vast(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Knotted(x) -> Clogging(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) and Asphaltic(x) -> Clogging(x))\nKnotted(tristan) -> Vast(tristan)\nVague(tristan) -> Knotted(tristan)\nClogging(tristan) and Exculpated(tristan) -> Declarable(tristan)\n\nnot Declarable(tristan)\n\nClogging(tristan) and Exculpated(tristan) -> Declarable(tristan) <- forall x (Declarable(x) -> Exculpated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Madeline is flimsy. Madeline is mortified. Madeline is xcvi. Madeline is columnar. Madeline is majuscule. Waneta is downfield. Waneta is columnar. Round things are louche. If Waneta is xcvi then Waneta is mortified. If something is columnar and majuscule then it is flimsy. Furry things are columnar. All downfield, flimsy things are columnar. If Waneta is mortified then Waneta is majuscule. If Waneta is downfield then Waneta is mortified. If Waneta is columnar and Waneta is louche then Waneta is xcvi. Waneta is louche.", "logic": "\nFlimsy(madeline)\nMortified(madeline)\nXcvi(madeline)\nColumnar(madeline)\nMajuscule(madeline)\nDownfield(waneta)\nColumnar(waneta)\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Louche(x))\nXcvi(waneta) -> Mortified(waneta)\nforall x (Columnar(x) and Majuscule(x) -> Flimsy(x))\nforall x (Mortified(x) -> Columnar(x))\nforall x (Downfield(x) and Flimsy(x) -> Columnar(x))\nMortified(waneta) -> Majuscule(waneta)\nDownfield(waneta) -> Mortified(waneta)\nColumnar(waneta) and Louche(waneta) -> Xcvi(waneta)\n\nLouche(waneta)\n\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Louche(x)) <- Columnar(waneta) and Louche(waneta) -> Xcvi(waneta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Ilysa is zippy. Alain is recumbent. Sib is unbrushed. All recumbent, scrupulous things are gleeful. All zippy things are unbrushed. If something is unbrushed then it is scrupulous. If something is scrupulous then it is anurous. If Sib is gleeful then Sib is anurous. If something is anurous then it is zippy. Ilysa is zippy.", "logic": "\nZippy(ilysa)\nRecumbent(alain)\nUnbrushed(sib)\nforall x (Recumbent(x) and Scrupulous(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Zippy(x) -> Unbrushed(x))\nforall x (Unbrushed(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Anurous(x))\nGleeful(sib) -> Anurous(sib)\nforall x (Anurous(x) -> Zippy(x))\n\nZippy(ilysa)\n\ntherefore Zippy(ilysa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Swen is dependant. Cynthy is basined. Aleecia is potable. All basined, mesonic things are motherly. All dependant things are potable. If something is potable then it is mesonic. If something is mesonic then it is bivalent. If Aleecia is motherly then Aleecia is bivalent. If something is bivalent then it is dependant. Swen is not dependant.", "logic": "\nDependant(swen)\nBasined(cynthy)\nPotable(aleecia)\nforall x (Basined(x) and Mesonic(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) -> Potable(x))\nforall x (Potable(x) -> Mesonic(x))\nforall x (Mesonic(x) -> Bivalent(x))\nMotherly(aleecia) -> Bivalent(aleecia)\nforall x (Bivalent(x) -> Dependant(x))\n\nnot Dependant(swen)\n\ntherefore Dependant(swen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Kendra is writhed. Felipa is untellable. Nicholas is chantlike. All untellable, attenuate things are unlovely. All writhed things are chantlike. If something is chantlike then it is attenuate. If something is attenuate then it is scarce. If Nicholas is unlovely then Nicholas is scarce. If something is scarce then it is writhed. Nicholas is attenuate.", "logic": "\nWrithed(kendra)\nUntellable(felipa)\nChantlike(nicholas)\nforall x (Untellable(x) and Attenuate(x) -> Unlovely(x))\nforall x (Writhed(x) -> Chantlike(x))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> Attenuate(x))\nforall x (Attenuate(x) -> Scarce(x))\nUnlovely(nicholas) -> Scarce(nicholas)\nforall x (Scarce(x) -> Writhed(x))\n\nAttenuate(nicholas)\n\nChantlike(nicholas) and forall x (Chantlike(x) -> Attenuate(x)) -> therefore Attenuate(nicholas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Dareen is mediaeval. Jyoti is abortive. Randee is described. All abortive, cacophonic things are ukrainian. All mediaeval things are described. If something is described then it is cacophonic. If something is cacophonic then it is donnish. If Randee is ukrainian then Randee is donnish. If something is donnish then it is mediaeval. Randee is not cacophonic.", "logic": "\nMediaeval(dareen)\nAbortive(jyoti)\nDescribed(randee)\nforall x (Abortive(x) and Cacophonic(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) -> Described(x))\nforall x (Described(x) -> Cacophonic(x))\nforall x (Cacophonic(x) -> Donnish(x))\nUkrainian(randee) -> Donnish(randee)\nforall x (Donnish(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\n\nnot Cacophonic(randee)\n\nDescribed(randee) and forall x (Described(x) -> Cacophonic(x)) -> therefore Cacophonic(randee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Eileen is unshaved. Jerzy is jolly. Malanie is mechanic. All jolly, shitty things are microbic. All unshaved things are mechanic. If something is mechanic then it is shitty. If something is shitty then it is sham. If Malanie is microbic then Malanie is sham. If something is sham then it is unshaved. Malanie is sham.", "logic": "\nUnshaved(eileen)\nJolly(jerzy)\nMechanic(malanie)\nforall x (Jolly(x) and Shitty(x) -> Microbic(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Mechanic(x))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) -> Shitty(x))\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Sham(x))\nMicrobic(malanie) -> Sham(malanie)\nforall x (Sham(x) -> Unshaved(x))\n\nSham(malanie)\n\nMechanic(malanie) and forall x (Mechanic(x) -> Shitty(x)) -> therefore Shitty(malanie) Shitty(malanie) and forall x (Shitty(x) -> Sham(x)) -> therefore Sham(malanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Nevile is elapsed. Eugenia is parochial. Clari is continent. All parochial, frisky things are curst. All elapsed things are continent. If something is continent then it is frisky. If something is frisky then it is hypethral. If Clari is curst then Clari is hypethral. If something is hypethral then it is elapsed. Clari is not hypethral.", "logic": "\nElapsed(nevile)\nParochial(eugenia)\nContinent(clari)\nforall x (Parochial(x) and Frisky(x) -> Curst(x))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) -> Continent(x))\nforall x (Continent(x) -> Frisky(x))\nforall x (Frisky(x) -> Hypethral(x))\nCurst(clari) -> Hypethral(clari)\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> Elapsed(x))\n\nnot Hypethral(clari)\n\nContinent(clari) and forall x (Continent(x) -> Frisky(x)) -> therefore Frisky(clari) Frisky(clari) and forall x (Frisky(x) -> Hypethral(x)) -> therefore Hypethral(clari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Eldon is ruined. Roman is gravid. Diana is split. All gravid, comose things are eupneic. All ruined things are split. If something is split then it is comose. If something is comose then it is bovid. If Diana is eupneic then Diana is bovid. If something is bovid then it is ruined. Diana is ruined.", "logic": "\nRuined(eldon)\nGravid(roman)\nSplit(diana)\nforall x (Gravid(x) and Comose(x) -> Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Ruined(x) -> Split(x))\nforall x (Split(x) -> Comose(x))\nforall x (Comose(x) -> Bovid(x))\nEupneic(diana) -> Bovid(diana)\nforall x (Bovid(x) -> Ruined(x))\n\nRuined(diana)\n\nSplit(diana) and forall x (Split(x) -> Comose(x)) -> therefore Comose(diana) Comose(diana) and forall x (Comose(x) -> Bovid(x)) -> therefore Bovid(diana) Bovid(diana) and forall x (Bovid(x) -> Ruined(x)) -> therefore Ruined(diana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Daphene is bindable. Meredeth is determined. Ransom is ventilated. All determined, blank things are confirming. All bindable things are ventilated. If something is ventilated then it is blank. If something is blank then it is absorbed. If Ransom is confirming then Ransom is absorbed. If something is absorbed then it is bindable. Daphene is not absorbed.", "logic": "\nBindable(daphene)\nDetermined(meredeth)\nVentilated(ransom)\nforall x (Determined(x) and Blank(x) -> Confirming(x))\nforall x (Bindable(x) -> Ventilated(x))\nforall x (Ventilated(x) -> Blank(x))\nforall x (Blank(x) -> Absorbed(x))\nConfirming(ransom) -> Absorbed(ransom)\nforall x (Absorbed(x) -> Bindable(x))\n\nnot Absorbed(daphene)\n\nBindable(daphene) and forall x (Bindable(x) -> Ventilated(x)) -> therefore Ventilated(daphene) Ventilated(daphene) and forall x (Ventilated(x) -> Blank(x)) -> therefore Blank(daphene) Blank(daphene) and forall x (Blank(x) -> Absorbed(x)) -> therefore Absorbed(daphene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Lucinda is sophomore. Meira is enzymatic. Kellyann is arduous. All enzymatic, sobersided things are affined. All sophomore things are arduous. If something is arduous then it is sobersided. If something is sobersided then it is centralist. If Kellyann is affined then Kellyann is centralist. If something is centralist then it is sophomore. Kellyann is not affined.", "logic": "\nSophomore(lucinda)\nEnzymatic(meira)\nArduous(kellyann)\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) and Sobersided(x) -> Affined(x))\nforall x (Sophomore(x) -> Arduous(x))\nforall x (Arduous(x) -> Sobersided(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) -> Centralist(x))\nAffined(kellyann) -> Centralist(kellyann)\nforall x (Centralist(x) -> Sophomore(x))\n\nnot Affined(kellyann)\n\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) and Sobersided(x) -> Affined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Allyson is bemused. Jolyn is cubiform. Philomena is dispensed. All cubiform, shoreward things are amphoric. All bemused things are dispensed. If something is dispensed then it is shoreward. If something is shoreward then it is amenable. If Philomena is amphoric then Philomena is amenable. If something is amenable then it is bemused. Jolyn is shoreward.", "logic": "\nBemused(allyson)\nCubiform(jolyn)\nDispensed(philomena)\nforall x (Cubiform(x) and Shoreward(x) -> Amphoric(x))\nforall x (Bemused(x) -> Dispensed(x))\nforall x (Dispensed(x) -> Shoreward(x))\nforall x (Shoreward(x) -> Amenable(x))\nAmphoric(philomena) -> Amenable(philomena)\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Bemused(x))\n\nShoreward(jolyn)\n\nforall x (Dispensed(x) -> Shoreward(x)) <- forall x (Bemused(x) -> Dispensed(x)) <- forall x (Amenable(x) -> Bemused(x)) <- forall x (Shoreward(x) -> Amenable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Opal is completing. Kane is roughened. Ronica is numerable. All roughened, propellant things are cinerary. All completing things are numerable. If something is numerable then it is propellant. If something is propellant then it is estuarial. If Ronica is cinerary then Ronica is estuarial. If something is estuarial then it is completing. Kane is not completing.", "logic": "\nCompleting(opal)\nRoughened(kane)\nNumerable(ronica)\nforall x (Roughened(x) and Propellant(x) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Completing(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Numerable(x) -> Propellant(x))\nforall x (Propellant(x) -> Estuarial(x))\nCinerary(ronica) -> Estuarial(ronica)\nforall x (Estuarial(x) -> Completing(x))\n\nnot Completing(kane)\n\nforall x (Estuarial(x) -> Completing(x)) <- forall x (Propellant(x) -> Estuarial(x)) <- forall x (Numerable(x) -> Propellant(x)) <- forall x (Completing(x) -> Numerable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Temp is lucent. Aimil is quaint. Nicolette is belittling. All quaint, unscripted things are primal. All lucent things are belittling. If something is belittling then it is unscripted. If something is unscripted then it is nigerien. If Nicolette is primal then Nicolette is nigerien. If something is nigerien then it is lucent. Temp is primal.", "logic": "\nLucent(temp)\nQuaint(aimil)\nBelittling(nicolette)\nforall x (Quaint(x) and Unscripted(x) -> Primal(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Belittling(x))\nforall x (Belittling(x) -> Unscripted(x))\nforall x (Unscripted(x) -> Nigerien(x))\nPrimal(nicolette) -> Nigerien(nicolette)\nforall x (Nigerien(x) -> Lucent(x))\n\nPrimal(temp)\n\nforall x (Quaint(x) and Unscripted(x) -> Primal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Annaliese is frangible. Mora is chinked. Theodora is written. All chinked, ulcerative things are maddening. All frangible things are written. If something is written then it is ulcerative. If something is ulcerative then it is cogitative. If Theodora is maddening then Theodora is cogitative. If something is cogitative then it is frangible. Mora is not smart.", "logic": "\nFrangible(annaliese)\nChinked(mora)\nWritten(theodora)\nforall x (Chinked(x) and Ulcerative(x) -> Maddening(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Written(x))\nforall x (Written(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Ulcerative(x) -> Cogitative(x))\nMaddening(theodora) -> Cogitative(theodora)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) -> Frangible(x))\n\nnot Smart(mora)\n\nnot Smart(mora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Tabby is strange. Weber is crapulous. Orren is susurrous. All crapulous, tigerish things are backhanded. All strange things are susurrous. If something is susurrous then it is tigerish. If something is tigerish then it is windblown. If Orren is backhanded then Orren is windblown. If something is windblown then it is strange. Orren is crapulous.", "logic": "\nStrange(tabby)\nCrapulous(weber)\nSusurrous(orren)\nforall x (Crapulous(x) and Tigerish(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) -> Susurrous(x))\nforall x (Susurrous(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Windblown(x))\nBackhanded(orren) -> Windblown(orren)\nforall x (Windblown(x) -> Strange(x))\n\nCrapulous(orren)\n\nCrapulous(orren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Farra is senecan. Crystal is capacitive. Gipsy is descendant. All capacitive, eurasiatic things are adrenal. All senecan things are descendant. If something is descendant then it is eurasiatic. If something is eurasiatic then it is croaky. If Gipsy is adrenal then Gipsy is croaky. If something is croaky then it is senecan. Farra is not smart.", "logic": "\nSenecan(farra)\nCapacitive(crystal)\nDescendant(gipsy)\nforall x (Capacitive(x) and Eurasiatic(x) -> Adrenal(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Descendant(x))\nforall x (Descendant(x) -> Eurasiatic(x))\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) -> Croaky(x))\nAdrenal(gipsy) -> Croaky(gipsy)\nforall x (Croaky(x) -> Senecan(x))\n\nnot Smart(farra)\n\nnot Smart(farra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Toddy is cloven. Shelley is unmapped. Derick is fiftieth. All unmapped, azygos things are bristled. All cloven things are fiftieth. If something is fiftieth then it is azygos. If something is azygos then it is guarded. If Derick is bristled then Derick is guarded. If something is guarded then it is cloven. Toddy is unmapped.", "logic": "\nCloven(toddy)\nUnmapped(shelley)\nFiftieth(derick)\nforall x (Unmapped(x) and Azygos(x) -> Bristled(x))\nforall x (Cloven(x) -> Fiftieth(x))\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Azygos(x))\nforall x (Azygos(x) -> Guarded(x))\nBristled(derick) -> Guarded(derick)\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Cloven(x))\n\nUnmapped(toddy)\n\nUnmapped(toddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Allina is not welfarist. Allina is untaught. Allina is not scanty. Allina is citric. Celinka is welfarist. Celinka is untaught. Celinka is not brave. If something is welfarist and not unplaced then it is not scanty. If something is welfarist and not brave then it is scanty. If something is welfarist and not unplaced then it is citric. If something is scanty then it is citric. If something is brave and not unplaced then it is improved. If something is citric and not brave then it is improved. Celinka is not brave.", "logic": "\nnot Welfarist(allina)\nUntaught(allina)\nnot Scanty(allina)\nCitric(allina)\nWelfarist(celinka)\nUntaught(celinka)\nnot Brave(celinka)\nforall x (Welfarist(x) and not Unplaced(x) -> not Scanty(x))\nforall x (Welfarist(x) and not Brave(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Welfarist(x) and not Unplaced(x) -> Citric(x))\nforall x (Scanty(x) -> Citric(x))\nforall x (Brave(x) and not Unplaced(x) -> Improved(x))\nforall x (Citric(x) and not Brave(x) -> Improved(x))\n\nnot Brave(celinka)\n\ntherefore not Brave(celinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Mignon is not triangular. Mignon is fitted. Mignon is not unavailing. Mignon is altaic. Krishna is triangular. Krishna is fitted. Krishna is not docile. If something is triangular and not fricative then it is not unavailing. If something is triangular and not docile then it is unavailing. If something is triangular and not fricative then it is altaic. If something is unavailing then it is altaic. If something is docile and not fricative then it is pyramidal. If something is altaic and not docile then it is pyramidal. Mignon is triangular.", "logic": "\nnot Triangular(mignon)\nFitted(mignon)\nnot Unavailing(mignon)\nAltaic(mignon)\nTriangular(krishna)\nFitted(krishna)\nnot Docile(krishna)\nforall x (Triangular(x) and not Fricative(x) -> not Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Triangular(x) and not Docile(x) -> Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Triangular(x) and not Fricative(x) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Docile(x) and not Fricative(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nforall x (Altaic(x) and not Docile(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\n\nTriangular(mignon)\n\ntherefore not Triangular(mignon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Sharla is not monkish. Sharla is holozoic. Sharla is not weedy. Sharla is jinxed. Neron is monkish. Neron is holozoic. Neron is not toasted. If something is monkish and not pupillary then it is not weedy. If something is monkish and not toasted then it is weedy. If something is monkish and not pupillary then it is jinxed. If something is weedy then it is jinxed. If something is toasted and not pupillary then it is halal. If something is jinxed and not toasted then it is halal. Neron is weedy.", "logic": "\nnot Monkish(sharla)\nHolozoic(sharla)\nnot Weedy(sharla)\nJinxed(sharla)\nMonkish(neron)\nHolozoic(neron)\nnot Toasted(neron)\nforall x (Monkish(x) and not Pupillary(x) -> not Weedy(x))\nforall x (Monkish(x) and not Toasted(x) -> Weedy(x))\nforall x (Monkish(x) and not Pupillary(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Toasted(x) and not Pupillary(x) -> Halal(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and not Toasted(x) -> Halal(x))\n\nWeedy(neron)\n\nMonkish(neron) and not Toasted(neron) and forall x (Monkish(x) and not Toasted(x) -> Weedy(x)) -> therefore Weedy(neron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Jillane is not myelic. Jillane is sensuous. Jillane is not varied. Jillane is agog. Edee is myelic. Edee is sensuous. Edee is not twilit. If something is myelic and not cancellate then it is not varied. If something is myelic and not twilit then it is varied. If something is myelic and not cancellate then it is agog. If something is varied then it is agog. If something is twilit and not cancellate then it is expositive. If something is agog and not twilit then it is expositive. Edee is not varied.", "logic": "\nnot Myelic(jillane)\nSensuous(jillane)\nnot Varied(jillane)\nAgog(jillane)\nMyelic(edee)\nSensuous(edee)\nnot Twilit(edee)\nforall x (Myelic(x) and not Cancellate(x) -> not Varied(x))\nforall x (Myelic(x) and not Twilit(x) -> Varied(x))\nforall x (Myelic(x) and not Cancellate(x) -> Agog(x))\nforall x (Varied(x) -> Agog(x))\nforall x (Twilit(x) and not Cancellate(x) -> Expositive(x))\nforall x (Agog(x) and not Twilit(x) -> Expositive(x))\n\nnot Varied(edee)\n\nMyelic(edee) and not Twilit(edee) and forall x (Myelic(x) and not Twilit(x) -> Varied(x)) -> therefore Varied(edee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Fatima is not podgy. Fatima is victorian. Fatima is not crustacean. Fatima is diarrhoeic. Shalom is podgy. Shalom is victorian. Shalom is not pandemic. If something is podgy and not foxy then it is not crustacean. If something is podgy and not pandemic then it is crustacean. If something is podgy and not foxy then it is diarrhoeic. If something is crustacean then it is diarrhoeic. If something is pandemic and not foxy then it is prefaded. If something is diarrhoeic and not pandemic then it is prefaded. Shalom is diarrhoeic.", "logic": "\nnot Podgy(fatima)\nVictorian(fatima)\nnot Crustacean(fatima)\nDiarrhoeic(fatima)\nPodgy(shalom)\nVictorian(shalom)\nnot Pandemic(shalom)\nforall x (Podgy(x) and not Foxy(x) -> not Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Podgy(x) and not Pandemic(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Podgy(x) and not Foxy(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (Crustacean(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) and not Foxy(x) -> Prefaded(x))\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) and not Pandemic(x) -> Prefaded(x))\n\nDiarrhoeic(shalom)\n\nPodgy(shalom) and not Pandemic(shalom) and forall x (Podgy(x) and not Pandemic(x) -> Crustacean(x)) -> therefore Crustacean(shalom) Crustacean(shalom) and forall x (Crustacean(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x)) -> therefore Diarrhoeic(shalom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Taddeus is not diluvial. Taddeus is unproved. Taddeus is not untwisted. Taddeus is upcurved. Brandice is diluvial. Brandice is unproved. Brandice is not opencut. If something is diluvial and not hitless then it is not untwisted. If something is diluvial and not opencut then it is untwisted. If something is diluvial and not hitless then it is upcurved. If something is untwisted then it is upcurved. If something is opencut and not hitless then it is activistic. If something is upcurved and not opencut then it is activistic. Brandice is not upcurved.", "logic": "\nnot Diluvial(taddeus)\nUnproved(taddeus)\nnot Untwisted(taddeus)\nUpcurved(taddeus)\nDiluvial(brandice)\nUnproved(brandice)\nnot Opencut(brandice)\nforall x (Diluvial(x) and not Hitless(x) -> not Untwisted(x))\nforall x (Diluvial(x) and not Opencut(x) -> Untwisted(x))\nforall x (Diluvial(x) and not Hitless(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) and not Hitless(x) -> Activistic(x))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and not Opencut(x) -> Activistic(x))\n\nnot Upcurved(brandice)\n\nDiluvial(brandice) and not Opencut(brandice) and forall x (Diluvial(x) and not Opencut(x) -> Untwisted(x)) -> therefore Untwisted(brandice) Untwisted(brandice) and forall x (Untwisted(x) -> Upcurved(x)) -> therefore Upcurved(brandice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Abner is not vesical. Abner is incitive. Abner is not beneficed. Abner is unfinished. Gratiana is vesical. Gratiana is incitive. Gratiana is not oncologic. If something is vesical and not legged then it is not beneficed. If something is vesical and not oncologic then it is beneficed. If something is vesical and not legged then it is unfinished. If something is beneficed then it is unfinished. If something is oncologic and not legged then it is lexical. If something is unfinished and not oncologic then it is lexical. Gratiana is lexical.", "logic": "\nnot Vesical(abner)\nIncitive(abner)\nnot Beneficed(abner)\nUnfinished(abner)\nVesical(gratiana)\nIncitive(gratiana)\nnot Oncologic(gratiana)\nforall x (Vesical(x) and not Legged(x) -> not Beneficed(x))\nforall x (Vesical(x) and not Oncologic(x) -> Beneficed(x))\nforall x (Vesical(x) and not Legged(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Beneficed(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Oncologic(x) and not Legged(x) -> Lexical(x))\nforall x (Unfinished(x) and not Oncologic(x) -> Lexical(x))\n\nLexical(gratiana)\n\nVesical(gratiana) and not Oncologic(gratiana) and forall x (Vesical(x) and not Oncologic(x) -> Beneficed(x)) -> therefore Beneficed(gratiana) Beneficed(gratiana) and forall x (Beneficed(x) -> Unfinished(x)) -> therefore Unfinished(gratiana) Unfinished(gratiana) and not Oncologic(gratiana) and forall x (Unfinished(x) and not Oncologic(x) -> Lexical(x)) -> therefore Lexical(gratiana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Mendel is not homonymic. Mendel is unreserved. Mendel is not threadbare. Mendel is stately. Husein is homonymic. Husein is unreserved. Husein is not lactating. If something is homonymic and not mincing then it is not threadbare. If something is homonymic and not lactating then it is threadbare. If something is homonymic and not mincing then it is stately. If something is threadbare then it is stately. If something is lactating and not mincing then it is bolivian. If something is stately and not lactating then it is bolivian. Husein is not bolivian.", "logic": "\nnot Homonymic(mendel)\nUnreserved(mendel)\nnot Threadbare(mendel)\nStately(mendel)\nHomonymic(husein)\nUnreserved(husein)\nnot Lactating(husein)\nforall x (Homonymic(x) and not Mincing(x) -> not Threadbare(x))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) and not Lactating(x) -> Threadbare(x))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) and not Mincing(x) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Threadbare(x) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Lactating(x) and not Mincing(x) -> Bolivian(x))\nforall x (Stately(x) and not Lactating(x) -> Bolivian(x))\n\nnot Bolivian(husein)\n\nHomonymic(husein) and not Lactating(husein) and forall x (Homonymic(x) and not Lactating(x) -> Threadbare(x)) -> therefore Threadbare(husein) Threadbare(husein) and forall x (Threadbare(x) -> Stately(x)) -> therefore Stately(husein) Stately(husein) and not Lactating(husein) and forall x (Stately(x) and not Lactating(x) -> Bolivian(x)) -> therefore Bolivian(husein)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Kiah is not reedlike. Kiah is hazy. Kiah is not garbled. Kiah is diarrheic. Gredel is reedlike. Gredel is hazy. Gredel is not feral. If something is reedlike and not aberrant then it is not garbled. If something is reedlike and not feral then it is garbled. If something is reedlike and not aberrant then it is diarrheic. If something is garbled then it is diarrheic. If something is feral and not aberrant then it is uncurled. If something is diarrheic and not feral then it is uncurled. Kiah is not uncurled.", "logic": "\nnot Reedlike(kiah)\nHazy(kiah)\nnot Garbled(kiah)\nDiarrheic(kiah)\nReedlike(gredel)\nHazy(gredel)\nnot Feral(gredel)\nforall x (Reedlike(x) and not Aberrant(x) -> not Garbled(x))\nforall x (Reedlike(x) and not Feral(x) -> Garbled(x))\nforall x (Reedlike(x) and not Aberrant(x) -> Diarrheic(x))\nforall x (Garbled(x) -> Diarrheic(x))\nforall x (Feral(x) and not Aberrant(x) -> Uncurled(x))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and not Feral(x) -> Uncurled(x))\n\nnot Uncurled(kiah)\n\nforall x (Feral(x) and not Aberrant(x) -> Uncurled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Curt is not quaternate. Curt is bismuthic. Curt is not untreated. Curt is oversewn. Hetty is quaternate. Hetty is bismuthic. Hetty is not toxicant. If something is quaternate and not lovesick then it is not untreated. If something is quaternate and not toxicant then it is untreated. If something is quaternate and not lovesick then it is oversewn. If something is untreated then it is oversewn. If something is toxicant and not lovesick then it is veracious. If something is oversewn and not toxicant then it is veracious. Hetty is lovesick.", "logic": "\nnot Quaternate(curt)\nBismuthic(curt)\nnot Untreated(curt)\nOversewn(curt)\nQuaternate(hetty)\nBismuthic(hetty)\nnot Toxicant(hetty)\nforall x (Quaternate(x) and not Lovesick(x) -> not Untreated(x))\nforall x (Quaternate(x) and not Toxicant(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Quaternate(x) and not Lovesick(x) -> Oversewn(x))\nforall x (Untreated(x) -> Oversewn(x))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) and not Lovesick(x) -> Veracious(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) and not Toxicant(x) -> Veracious(x))\n\nLovesick(hetty)\n\nLovesick(hetty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Malva is not cryptic. Malva is relieved. Malva is not ambiguous. Malva is antheral. Hassan is cryptic. Hassan is relieved. Hassan is not prior. If something is cryptic and not appeasing then it is not ambiguous. If something is cryptic and not prior then it is ambiguous. If something is cryptic and not appeasing then it is antheral. If something is ambiguous then it is antheral. If something is prior and not appeasing then it is cussed. If something is antheral and not prior then it is cussed. Malva is not prior.", "logic": "\nnot Cryptic(malva)\nRelieved(malva)\nnot Ambiguous(malva)\nAntheral(malva)\nCryptic(hassan)\nRelieved(hassan)\nnot Prior(hassan)\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and not Appeasing(x) -> not Ambiguous(x))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and not Prior(x) -> Ambiguous(x))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and not Appeasing(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Ambiguous(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Prior(x) and not Appeasing(x) -> Cussed(x))\nforall x (Antheral(x) and not Prior(x) -> Cussed(x))\n\nnot Prior(malva)\n\nnot Prior(malva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Rhetta is not fitting. Rhetta is guatemalan. Rhetta is not detected. Rhetta is acellular. Carlisle is fitting. Carlisle is guatemalan. Carlisle is not jowly. If something is fitting and not mitotic then it is not detected. If something is fitting and not jowly then it is detected. If something is fitting and not mitotic then it is acellular. If something is detected then it is acellular. If something is jowly and not mitotic then it is regulatory. If something is acellular and not jowly then it is regulatory. Rhetta is mitotic.", "logic": "\nnot Fitting(rhetta)\nGuatemalan(rhetta)\nnot Detected(rhetta)\nAcellular(rhetta)\nFitting(carlisle)\nGuatemalan(carlisle)\nnot Jowly(carlisle)\nforall x (Fitting(x) and not Mitotic(x) -> not Detected(x))\nforall x (Fitting(x) and not Jowly(x) -> Detected(x))\nforall x (Fitting(x) and not Mitotic(x) -> Acellular(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Acellular(x))\nforall x (Jowly(x) and not Mitotic(x) -> Regulatory(x))\nforall x (Acellular(x) and not Jowly(x) -> Regulatory(x))\n\nMitotic(rhetta)\n\nMitotic(rhetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "The alvira militarize the anja. The robbyn shrill the anja. The anja shrill the bealle. The bealle does not like the robbyn. If someone shrill the robbyn then they need the anja. If someone militarize the robbyn then the robbyn shrill the anja. If someone shrill the anja then the anja retie the alvira. If someone shrill the bealle then they like the alvira. If someone shrill the anja and the anja militarize the alvira then the anja shrill the robbyn. All speedy people are disjoint. If someone is poached and they need the anja then they eat the anja. If someone shrill the alvira then they need the robbyn. The anja shrill the bealle.", "logic": "\nMilitarize(alvira, anja)\nShrill(robbyn, anja)\nShrill(anja, bealle)\nnot Militarize(bealle, robbyn)\nforall x (Shrill(x, robbyn) -> Retie(x, anja))\nforall x (Militarize(x, robbyn) -> Shrill(robbyn, anja))\nforall x (Shrill(x, anja) -> Retie(anja, alvira))\nforall x (Shrill(x, bealle) -> Militarize(x, alvira))\nforall x (Shrill(x, anja) and Militarize(anja, alvira) -> Shrill(anja, robbyn))\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Disjoint(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) and Retie(x, anja) -> Shrill(x, anja))\nforall x (Shrill(x, alvira) -> Retie(x, robbyn))\n\nShrill(anja, bealle)\n\ntherefore Shrill(anja, bealle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The carmina galvanise the dean. The moishe ding the dean. The dean ding the arnold. The arnold does not like the moishe. If someone ding the moishe then they need the dean. If someone galvanise the moishe then the moishe ding the dean. If someone ding the dean then the dean lull the carmina. If someone ding the arnold then they like the carmina. If someone ding the dean and the dean galvanise the carmina then the dean ding the moishe. All tasseled people are bilobate. If someone is flexible and they need the dean then they eat the dean. If someone ding the carmina then they need the moishe. The dean does not eat the arnold.", "logic": "\nGalvanise(carmina, dean)\nDing(moishe, dean)\nDing(dean, arnold)\nnot Galvanise(arnold, moishe)\nforall x (Ding(x, moishe) -> Lull(x, dean))\nforall x (Galvanise(x, moishe) -> Ding(moishe, dean))\nforall x (Ding(x, dean) -> Lull(dean, carmina))\nforall x (Ding(x, arnold) -> Galvanise(x, carmina))\nforall x (Ding(x, dean) and Galvanise(dean, carmina) -> Ding(dean, moishe))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Flexible(x) and Lull(x, dean) -> Ding(x, dean))\nforall x (Ding(x, carmina) -> Lull(x, moishe))\n\nnot Ding(dean, arnold)\n\ntherefore Ding(dean, arnold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The diannne grind the wilbur. The alvina handle the wilbur. The wilbur handle the rosene. The rosene does not like the alvina. If someone handle the alvina then they need the wilbur. If someone grind the alvina then the alvina handle the wilbur. If someone handle the wilbur then the wilbur cover the diannne. If someone handle the rosene then they like the diannne. If someone handle the wilbur and the wilbur grind the diannne then the wilbur handle the alvina. All enigmatic people are beautiful. If someone is spinnable and they need the wilbur then they eat the wilbur. If someone handle the diannne then they need the alvina. The wilbur grind the diannne.", "logic": "\nGrind(diannne, wilbur)\nHandle(alvina, wilbur)\nHandle(wilbur, rosene)\nnot Grind(rosene, alvina)\nforall x (Handle(x, alvina) -> Cover(x, wilbur))\nforall x (Grind(x, alvina) -> Handle(alvina, wilbur))\nforall x (Handle(x, wilbur) -> Cover(wilbur, diannne))\nforall x (Handle(x, rosene) -> Grind(x, diannne))\nforall x (Handle(x, wilbur) and Grind(wilbur, diannne) -> Handle(wilbur, alvina))\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) -> Beautiful(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) and Cover(x, wilbur) -> Handle(x, wilbur))\nforall x (Handle(x, diannne) -> Cover(x, alvina))\n\nGrind(wilbur, diannne)\n\nHandle(wilbur, rosene) and forall x (Handle(x, rosene) -> Grind(x, diannne)) -> therefore Grind(wilbur, diannne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The cornelia baptize the hanan. The florie readmit the hanan. The hanan readmit the xenos. The xenos does not like the florie. If someone readmit the florie then they need the hanan. If someone baptize the florie then the florie readmit the hanan. If someone readmit the hanan then the hanan galvanize the cornelia. If someone readmit the xenos then they like the cornelia. If someone readmit the hanan and the hanan baptize the cornelia then the hanan readmit the florie. All antique people are prevenient. If someone is lawless and they need the hanan then they eat the hanan. If someone readmit the cornelia then they need the florie. The hanan does not need the cornelia.", "logic": "\nBaptize(cornelia, hanan)\nReadmit(florie, hanan)\nReadmit(hanan, xenos)\nnot Baptize(xenos, florie)\nforall x (Readmit(x, florie) -> Galvanize(x, hanan))\nforall x (Baptize(x, florie) -> Readmit(florie, hanan))\nforall x (Readmit(x, hanan) -> Galvanize(hanan, cornelia))\nforall x (Readmit(x, xenos) -> Baptize(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Readmit(x, hanan) and Baptize(hanan, cornelia) -> Readmit(hanan, florie))\nforall x (Antique(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) and Galvanize(x, hanan) -> Readmit(x, hanan))\nforall x (Readmit(x, cornelia) -> Galvanize(x, florie))\n\nnot Galvanize(hanan, cornelia)\n\nReadmit(florie, hanan) and forall x (Readmit(x, hanan) -> Galvanize(hanan, cornelia)) -> therefore Galvanize(hanan, cornelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The jacinthe doze the shannan. The carmella biff the shannan. The shannan biff the delbert. The delbert does not like the carmella. If someone biff the carmella then they need the shannan. If someone doze the carmella then the carmella biff the shannan. If someone biff the shannan then the shannan shun the jacinthe. If someone biff the delbert then they like the jacinthe. If someone biff the shannan and the shannan doze the jacinthe then the shannan biff the carmella. All tutorial people are columnlike. If someone is dastard and they need the shannan then they eat the shannan. If someone biff the jacinthe then they need the carmella. The shannan biff the carmella.", "logic": "\nDoze(jacinthe, shannan)\nBiff(carmella, shannan)\nBiff(shannan, delbert)\nnot Doze(delbert, carmella)\nforall x (Biff(x, carmella) -> Shun(x, shannan))\nforall x (Doze(x, carmella) -> Biff(carmella, shannan))\nforall x (Biff(x, shannan) -> Shun(shannan, jacinthe))\nforall x (Biff(x, delbert) -> Doze(x, jacinthe))\nforall x (Biff(x, shannan) and Doze(shannan, jacinthe) -> Biff(shannan, carmella))\nforall x (Tutorial(x) -> Columnlike(x))\nforall x (Dastard(x) and Shun(x, shannan) -> Biff(x, shannan))\nforall x (Biff(x, jacinthe) -> Shun(x, carmella))\n\nBiff(shannan, carmella)\n\nBiff(shannan, delbert) and forall x (Biff(x, delbert) -> Doze(x, jacinthe)) -> therefore Doze(shannan, jacinthe) Biff(carmella, shannan) and Doze(shannan, jacinthe) and forall x (Biff(x, shannan) and Doze(shannan, jacinthe) -> Biff(shannan, carmella)) -> therefore Biff(shannan, carmella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The celle latinise the marni. The tilly inherit the marni. The marni inherit the ailene. The ailene does not like the tilly. If someone inherit the tilly then they need the marni. If someone latinise the tilly then the tilly inherit the marni. If someone inherit the marni then the marni badge the celle. If someone inherit the ailene then they like the celle. If someone inherit the marni and the marni latinise the celle then the marni inherit the tilly. All forensic people are appellant. If someone is fortieth and they need the marni then they eat the marni. If someone inherit the celle then they need the tilly. The marni does not eat the tilly.", "logic": "\nLatinise(celle, marni)\nInherit(tilly, marni)\nInherit(marni, ailene)\nnot Latinise(ailene, tilly)\nforall x (Inherit(x, tilly) -> Badge(x, marni))\nforall x (Latinise(x, tilly) -> Inherit(tilly, marni))\nforall x (Inherit(x, marni) -> Badge(marni, celle))\nforall x (Inherit(x, ailene) -> Latinise(x, celle))\nforall x (Inherit(x, marni) and Latinise(marni, celle) -> Inherit(marni, tilly))\nforall x (Forensic(x) -> Appellant(x))\nforall x (Fortieth(x) and Badge(x, marni) -> Inherit(x, marni))\nforall x (Inherit(x, celle) -> Badge(x, tilly))\n\nnot Inherit(marni, tilly)\n\nInherit(marni, ailene) and forall x (Inherit(x, ailene) -> Latinise(x, celle)) -> therefore Latinise(marni, celle) Inherit(tilly, marni) and Latinise(marni, celle) and forall x (Inherit(x, marni) and Latinise(marni, celle) -> Inherit(marni, tilly)) -> therefore Inherit(marni, tilly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The karina bowdlerize the morry. The kingsly breed the morry. The morry breed the ninette. The ninette does not like the kingsly. If someone breed the kingsly then they need the morry. If someone bowdlerize the kingsly then the kingsly breed the morry. If someone breed the morry then the morry crenellate the karina. If someone breed the ninette then they like the karina. If someone breed the morry and the morry bowdlerize the karina then the morry breed the kingsly. All unveiled people are acetose. If someone is dyspneic and they need the morry then they eat the morry. If someone breed the karina then they need the kingsly. The morry crenellate the morry.", "logic": "\nBowdlerize(karina, morry)\nBreed(kingsly, morry)\nBreed(morry, ninette)\nnot Bowdlerize(ninette, kingsly)\nforall x (Breed(x, kingsly) -> Crenellate(x, morry))\nforall x (Bowdlerize(x, kingsly) -> Breed(kingsly, morry))\nforall x (Breed(x, morry) -> Crenellate(morry, karina))\nforall x (Breed(x, ninette) -> Bowdlerize(x, karina))\nforall x (Breed(x, morry) and Bowdlerize(morry, karina) -> Breed(morry, kingsly))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) -> Acetose(x))\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) and Crenellate(x, morry) -> Breed(x, morry))\nforall x (Breed(x, karina) -> Crenellate(x, kingsly))\n\nCrenellate(morry, morry)\n\nBreed(morry, ninette) and forall x (Breed(x, ninette) -> Bowdlerize(x, karina)) -> therefore Bowdlerize(morry, karina) Breed(kingsly, morry) and Bowdlerize(morry, karina) and forall x (Breed(x, morry) and Bowdlerize(morry, karina) -> Breed(morry, kingsly)) -> therefore Breed(morry, kingsly) Breed(morry, kingsly) and forall x (Breed(x, kingsly) -> Crenellate(x, morry)) -> therefore Crenellate(morry, morry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The lamar round the elsie. The gerome netmail the elsie. The elsie netmail the jervis. The jervis does not like the gerome. If someone netmail the gerome then they need the elsie. If someone round the gerome then the gerome netmail the elsie. If someone netmail the elsie then the elsie heterodyne the lamar. If someone netmail the jervis then they like the lamar. If someone netmail the elsie and the elsie round the lamar then the elsie netmail the gerome. All wizard people are coital. If someone is enforced and they need the elsie then they eat the elsie. If someone netmail the lamar then they need the gerome. The elsie does not need the elsie.", "logic": "\nRound(lamar, elsie)\nNetmail(gerome, elsie)\nNetmail(elsie, jervis)\nnot Round(jervis, gerome)\nforall x (Netmail(x, gerome) -> Heterodyne(x, elsie))\nforall x (Round(x, gerome) -> Netmail(gerome, elsie))\nforall x (Netmail(x, elsie) -> Heterodyne(elsie, lamar))\nforall x (Netmail(x, jervis) -> Round(x, lamar))\nforall x (Netmail(x, elsie) and Round(elsie, lamar) -> Netmail(elsie, gerome))\nforall x (Wizard(x) -> Coital(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Heterodyne(x, elsie) -> Netmail(x, elsie))\nforall x (Netmail(x, lamar) -> Heterodyne(x, gerome))\n\nnot Heterodyne(elsie, elsie)\n\nNetmail(elsie, jervis) and forall x (Netmail(x, jervis) -> Round(x, lamar)) -> therefore Round(elsie, lamar) Netmail(gerome, elsie) and Round(elsie, lamar) and forall x (Netmail(x, elsie) and Round(elsie, lamar) -> Netmail(elsie, gerome)) -> therefore Netmail(elsie, gerome) Netmail(elsie, gerome) and forall x (Netmail(x, gerome) -> Heterodyne(x, elsie)) -> therefore Heterodyne(elsie, elsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The ettie maintain the kalle. The karilynn bunt the kalle. The kalle bunt the gladi. The gladi does not like the karilynn. If someone bunt the karilynn then they need the kalle. If someone maintain the karilynn then the karilynn bunt the kalle. If someone bunt the kalle then the kalle tweedle the ettie. If someone bunt the gladi then they like the ettie. If someone bunt the kalle and the kalle maintain the ettie then the kalle bunt the karilynn. All absorbable people are perfected. If someone is unproved and they need the kalle then they eat the kalle. If someone bunt the ettie then they need the karilynn. The karilynn does not need the karilynn.", "logic": "\nMaintain(ettie, kalle)\nBunt(karilynn, kalle)\nBunt(kalle, gladi)\nnot Maintain(gladi, karilynn)\nforall x (Bunt(x, karilynn) -> Tweedle(x, kalle))\nforall x (Maintain(x, karilynn) -> Bunt(karilynn, kalle))\nforall x (Bunt(x, kalle) -> Tweedle(kalle, ettie))\nforall x (Bunt(x, gladi) -> Maintain(x, ettie))\nforall x (Bunt(x, kalle) and Maintain(kalle, ettie) -> Bunt(kalle, karilynn))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Perfected(x))\nforall x (Unproved(x) and Tweedle(x, kalle) -> Bunt(x, kalle))\nforall x (Bunt(x, ettie) -> Tweedle(x, karilynn))\n\nnot Tweedle(karilynn, karilynn)\n\nforall x (Bunt(x, ettie) -> Tweedle(x, karilynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The collette sprout the caty. The paloma fuddle the caty. The caty fuddle the samaria. The samaria does not like the paloma. If someone fuddle the paloma then they need the caty. If someone sprout the paloma then the paloma fuddle the caty. If someone fuddle the caty then the caty storm the collette. If someone fuddle the samaria then they like the collette. If someone fuddle the caty and the caty sprout the collette then the caty fuddle the paloma. All esthetic people are chechen. If someone is abreast and they need the caty then they eat the caty. If someone fuddle the collette then they need the paloma. The caty storm the paloma.", "logic": "\nSprout(collette, caty)\nFuddle(paloma, caty)\nFuddle(caty, samaria)\nnot Sprout(samaria, paloma)\nforall x (Fuddle(x, paloma) -> Storm(x, caty))\nforall x (Sprout(x, paloma) -> Fuddle(paloma, caty))\nforall x (Fuddle(x, caty) -> Storm(caty, collette))\nforall x (Fuddle(x, samaria) -> Sprout(x, collette))\nforall x (Fuddle(x, caty) and Sprout(caty, collette) -> Fuddle(caty, paloma))\nforall x (Esthetic(x) -> Chechen(x))\nforall x (Abreast(x) and Storm(x, caty) -> Fuddle(x, caty))\nforall x (Fuddle(x, collette) -> Storm(x, paloma))\n\nStorm(caty, paloma)\n\nforall x (Fuddle(x, collette) -> Storm(x, paloma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The timi berate the nola. The prince upchuck the nola. The nola upchuck the harriett. The harriett does not like the prince. If someone upchuck the prince then they need the nola. If someone berate the prince then the prince upchuck the nola. If someone upchuck the nola then the nola satisfice the timi. If someone upchuck the harriett then they like the timi. If someone upchuck the nola and the nola berate the timi then the nola upchuck the prince. All trying people are withered. If someone is garmented and they need the nola then they eat the nola. If someone upchuck the timi then they need the prince. The harriett does not need the nola.", "logic": "\nBerate(timi, nola)\nUpchuck(prince, nola)\nUpchuck(nola, harriett)\nnot Berate(harriett, prince)\nforall x (Upchuck(x, prince) -> Satisfice(x, nola))\nforall x (Berate(x, prince) -> Upchuck(prince, nola))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, nola) -> Satisfice(nola, timi))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, harriett) -> Berate(x, timi))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, nola) and Berate(nola, timi) -> Upchuck(nola, prince))\nforall x (Trying(x) -> Withered(x))\nforall x (Garmented(x) and Satisfice(x, nola) -> Upchuck(x, nola))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, timi) -> Satisfice(x, prince))\n\nnot Satisfice(harriett, nola)\n\nforall x (Upchuck(x, prince) -> Satisfice(x, nola)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The bryn distance the gladys. The love ping the gladys. The gladys ping the kimberli. The kimberli does not like the love. If someone ping the love then they need the gladys. If someone distance the love then the love ping the gladys. If someone ping the gladys then the gladys plume the bryn. If someone ping the kimberli then they like the bryn. If someone ping the gladys and the gladys distance the bryn then the gladys ping the love. All spare people are cyan. If someone is caucasian and they need the gladys then they eat the gladys. If someone ping the bryn then they need the love. The kimberli plume the love.", "logic": "\nDistance(bryn, gladys)\nPing(love, gladys)\nPing(gladys, kimberli)\nnot Distance(kimberli, love)\nforall x (Ping(x, love) -> Plume(x, gladys))\nforall x (Distance(x, love) -> Ping(love, gladys))\nforall x (Ping(x, gladys) -> Plume(gladys, bryn))\nforall x (Ping(x, kimberli) -> Distance(x, bryn))\nforall x (Ping(x, gladys) and Distance(gladys, bryn) -> Ping(gladys, love))\nforall x (Spare(x) -> Cyan(x))\nforall x (Caucasian(x) and Plume(x, gladys) -> Ping(x, gladys))\nforall x (Ping(x, bryn) -> Plume(x, love))\n\nPlume(kimberli, love)\n\nforall x (Ping(x, bryn) -> Plume(x, love)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The inesita harbour the gertie. The yolanthe redo the gertie. The gertie redo the sabrina. The sabrina does not like the yolanthe. If someone redo the yolanthe then they need the gertie. If someone harbour the yolanthe then the yolanthe redo the gertie. If someone redo the gertie then the gertie block the inesita. If someone redo the sabrina then they like the inesita. If someone redo the gertie and the gertie harbour the inesita then the gertie redo the yolanthe. All dignifying people are snaky. If someone is thready and they need the gertie then they eat the gertie. If someone redo the inesita then they need the yolanthe. The yolanthe does not like the gertie.", "logic": "\nHarbour(inesita, gertie)\nRedo(yolanthe, gertie)\nRedo(gertie, sabrina)\nnot Harbour(sabrina, yolanthe)\nforall x (Redo(x, yolanthe) -> Block(x, gertie))\nforall x (Harbour(x, yolanthe) -> Redo(yolanthe, gertie))\nforall x (Redo(x, gertie) -> Block(gertie, inesita))\nforall x (Redo(x, sabrina) -> Harbour(x, inesita))\nforall x (Redo(x, gertie) and Harbour(gertie, inesita) -> Redo(gertie, yolanthe))\nforall x (Dignifying(x) -> Snaky(x))\nforall x (Thready(x) and Block(x, gertie) -> Redo(x, gertie))\nforall x (Redo(x, inesita) -> Block(x, yolanthe))\n\nnot Harbour(yolanthe, gertie)\n\nnot Harbour(yolanthe, gertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The dulsea bedevil the dante. The niall obnubilate the dante. The dante obnubilate the gwendolyn. The gwendolyn does not like the niall. If someone obnubilate the niall then they need the dante. If someone bedevil the niall then the niall obnubilate the dante. If someone obnubilate the dante then the dante swan the dulsea. If someone obnubilate the gwendolyn then they like the dulsea. If someone obnubilate the dante and the dante bedevil the dulsea then the dante obnubilate the niall. All aphasic people are ghanian. If someone is baleful and they need the dante then they eat the dante. If someone obnubilate the dulsea then they need the niall. The dante obnubilate the dulsea.", "logic": "\nBedevil(dulsea, dante)\nObnubilate(niall, dante)\nObnubilate(dante, gwendolyn)\nnot Bedevil(gwendolyn, niall)\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, niall) -> Swan(x, dante))\nforall x (Bedevil(x, niall) -> Obnubilate(niall, dante))\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, dante) -> Swan(dante, dulsea))\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, gwendolyn) -> Bedevil(x, dulsea))\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, dante) and Bedevil(dante, dulsea) -> Obnubilate(dante, niall))\nforall x (Aphasic(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Baleful(x) and Swan(x, dante) -> Obnubilate(x, dante))\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, dulsea) -> Swan(x, niall))\n\nObnubilate(dante, dulsea)\n\nObnubilate(dante, dulsea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The steffi moisturize the elsey. The gavra paragraph the elsey. The elsey paragraph the kellie. The kellie does not like the gavra. If someone paragraph the gavra then they need the elsey. If someone moisturize the gavra then the gavra paragraph the elsey. If someone paragraph the elsey then the elsey blossom the steffi. If someone paragraph the kellie then they like the steffi. If someone paragraph the elsey and the elsey moisturize the steffi then the elsey paragraph the gavra. All demoniacal people are scentless. If someone is statuary and they need the elsey then they eat the elsey. If someone paragraph the steffi then they need the gavra. The gavra is not green.", "logic": "\nMoisturize(steffi, elsey)\nParagraph(gavra, elsey)\nParagraph(elsey, kellie)\nnot Moisturize(kellie, gavra)\nforall x (Paragraph(x, gavra) -> Blossom(x, elsey))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, gavra) -> Paragraph(gavra, elsey))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, elsey) -> Blossom(elsey, steffi))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, kellie) -> Moisturize(x, steffi))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, elsey) and Moisturize(elsey, steffi) -> Paragraph(elsey, gavra))\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) -> Scentless(x))\nforall x (Statuary(x) and Blossom(x, elsey) -> Paragraph(x, elsey))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, steffi) -> Blossom(x, gavra))\n\nnot Green(gavra)\n\nnot Green(gavra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The huntlee powwow the elmira. The greggory glissade the elmira. The elmira glissade the josephine. The josephine does not like the greggory. If someone glissade the greggory then they need the elmira. If someone powwow the greggory then the greggory glissade the elmira. If someone glissade the elmira then the elmira kvetch the huntlee. If someone glissade the josephine then they like the huntlee. If someone glissade the elmira and the elmira powwow the huntlee then the elmira glissade the greggory. All hierarchic people are huxleyan. If someone is nonrandom and they need the elmira then they eat the elmira. If someone glissade the huntlee then they need the greggory. The greggory is nonrandom.", "logic": "\nPowwow(huntlee, elmira)\nGlissade(greggory, elmira)\nGlissade(elmira, josephine)\nnot Powwow(josephine, greggory)\nforall x (Glissade(x, greggory) -> Kvetch(x, elmira))\nforall x (Powwow(x, greggory) -> Glissade(greggory, elmira))\nforall x (Glissade(x, elmira) -> Kvetch(elmira, huntlee))\nforall x (Glissade(x, josephine) -> Powwow(x, huntlee))\nforall x (Glissade(x, elmira) and Powwow(elmira, huntlee) -> Glissade(elmira, greggory))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) -> Huxleyan(x))\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and Kvetch(x, elmira) -> Glissade(x, elmira))\nforall x (Glissade(x, huntlee) -> Kvetch(x, greggory))\n\nNonrandom(greggory)\n\nNonrandom(greggory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The mellisa bolster the cameo. The veda bolster the martin. The veda nickname the mellisa. The martin bolster the cameo. The martin is most. The martin is dated. The cameo is agone. If something bolster the mellisa and the mellisa unseal the martin then the martin unseal the mellisa. If something nickname the martin then the martin nickname the cameo. If the cameo is dated and the cameo unseal the veda then the veda bolster the cameo. If something unseal the martin and it is catacorner then it bolster the martin. If something bolster the veda then the veda unseal the martin. If the veda nickname the mellisa then the veda nickname the martin. If something nickname the cameo then the cameo bolster the veda. If something is catacorner and it bolster the cameo then the cameo bolster the mellisa. The martin is most.", "logic": "\nBolster(mellisa, cameo)\nBolster(veda, martin)\nNickname(veda, mellisa)\nBolster(martin, cameo)\nMost(martin)\nDated(martin)\nAgone(cameo)\nforall x (Bolster(x, mellisa) and Unseal(mellisa, martin) -> Unseal(martin, mellisa))\nforall x (Nickname(x, martin) -> Nickname(martin, cameo))\nDated(cameo) and Unseal(cameo, veda) -> Bolster(veda, cameo)\nforall x (Unseal(x, martin) and Catacorner(x) -> Bolster(x, martin))\nforall x (Bolster(x, veda) -> Unseal(veda, martin))\nNickname(veda, mellisa) -> Nickname(veda, martin)\nforall x (Nickname(x, cameo) -> Bolster(cameo, veda))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) and Bolster(x, cameo) -> Bolster(cameo, mellisa))\n\nMost(martin)\n\ntherefore Most(martin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The andriana water the jared. The chet water the nancee. The chet overcast the andriana. The nancee water the jared. The nancee is basinal. The nancee is unsexy. The jared is jingoistic. If something water the andriana and the andriana reschedule the nancee then the nancee reschedule the andriana. If something overcast the nancee then the nancee overcast the jared. If the jared is unsexy and the jared reschedule the chet then the chet water the jared. If something reschedule the nancee and it is headfirst then it water the nancee. If something water the chet then the chet reschedule the nancee. If the chet overcast the andriana then the chet overcast the nancee. If something overcast the jared then the jared water the chet. If something is headfirst and it water the jared then the jared water the andriana. The nancee does not chase the jared.", "logic": "\nWater(andriana, jared)\nWater(chet, nancee)\nOvercast(chet, andriana)\nWater(nancee, jared)\nBasinal(nancee)\nUnsexy(nancee)\nJingoistic(jared)\nforall x (Water(x, andriana) and Reschedule(andriana, nancee) -> Reschedule(nancee, andriana))\nforall x (Overcast(x, nancee) -> Overcast(nancee, jared))\nUnsexy(jared) and Reschedule(jared, chet) -> Water(chet, jared)\nforall x (Reschedule(x, nancee) and Headfirst(x) -> Water(x, nancee))\nforall x (Water(x, chet) -> Reschedule(chet, nancee))\nOvercast(chet, andriana) -> Overcast(chet, nancee)\nforall x (Overcast(x, jared) -> Water(jared, chet))\nforall x (Headfirst(x) and Water(x, jared) -> Water(jared, andriana))\n\nnot Water(nancee, jared)\n\ntherefore Water(nancee, jared)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The helise recite the beverly. The gino recite the rosetta. The gino sell the helise. The rosetta recite the beverly. The rosetta is inviting. The rosetta is zolaesque. The beverly is achromic. If something recite the helise and the helise clobber the rosetta then the rosetta clobber the helise. If something sell the rosetta then the rosetta sell the beverly. If the beverly is zolaesque and the beverly clobber the gino then the gino recite the beverly. If something clobber the rosetta and it is walloping then it recite the rosetta. If something recite the gino then the gino clobber the rosetta. If the gino sell the helise then the gino sell the rosetta. If something sell the beverly then the beverly recite the gino. If something is walloping and it recite the beverly then the beverly recite the helise. The gino sell the rosetta.", "logic": "\nRecite(helise, beverly)\nRecite(gino, rosetta)\nSell(gino, helise)\nRecite(rosetta, beverly)\nInviting(rosetta)\nZolaesque(rosetta)\nAchromic(beverly)\nforall x (Recite(x, helise) and Clobber(helise, rosetta) -> Clobber(rosetta, helise))\nforall x (Sell(x, rosetta) -> Sell(rosetta, beverly))\nZolaesque(beverly) and Clobber(beverly, gino) -> Recite(gino, beverly)\nforall x (Clobber(x, rosetta) and Walloping(x) -> Recite(x, rosetta))\nforall x (Recite(x, gino) -> Clobber(gino, rosetta))\nSell(gino, helise) -> Sell(gino, rosetta)\nforall x (Sell(x, beverly) -> Recite(beverly, gino))\nforall x (Walloping(x) and Recite(x, beverly) -> Recite(beverly, helise))\n\nSell(gino, rosetta)\n\nSell(gino, helise) and Sell(gino, helise) -> Sell(gino, rosetta) -> therefore Sell(gino, rosetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The duffie outsail the julita. The winny outsail the louise. The winny count the duffie. The louise outsail the julita. The louise is four. The louise is fucking. The julita is candid. If something outsail the duffie and the duffie poise the louise then the louise poise the duffie. If something count the louise then the louise count the julita. If the julita is fucking and the julita poise the winny then the winny outsail the julita. If something poise the louise and it is footsure then it outsail the louise. If something outsail the winny then the winny poise the louise. If the winny count the duffie then the winny count the louise. If something count the julita then the julita outsail the winny. If something is footsure and it outsail the julita then the julita outsail the duffie. The winny does not visit the louise.", "logic": "\nOutsail(duffie, julita)\nOutsail(winny, louise)\nCount(winny, duffie)\nOutsail(louise, julita)\nFour(louise)\nFucking(louise)\nCandid(julita)\nforall x (Outsail(x, duffie) and Poise(duffie, louise) -> Poise(louise, duffie))\nforall x (Count(x, louise) -> Count(louise, julita))\nFucking(julita) and Poise(julita, winny) -> Outsail(winny, julita)\nforall x (Poise(x, louise) and Footsure(x) -> Outsail(x, louise))\nforall x (Outsail(x, winny) -> Poise(winny, louise))\nCount(winny, duffie) -> Count(winny, louise)\nforall x (Count(x, julita) -> Outsail(julita, winny))\nforall x (Footsure(x) and Outsail(x, julita) -> Outsail(julita, duffie))\n\nnot Count(winny, louise)\n\nCount(winny, duffie) and Count(winny, duffie) -> Count(winny, louise) -> therefore Count(winny, louise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The phelia rake the tana. The jacinthe rake the cybill. The jacinthe stet the phelia. The cybill rake the tana. The cybill is eased. The cybill is legitimate. The tana is twin. If something rake the phelia and the phelia scour the cybill then the cybill scour the phelia. If something stet the cybill then the cybill stet the tana. If the tana is legitimate and the tana scour the jacinthe then the jacinthe rake the tana. If something scour the cybill and it is jamaican then it rake the cybill. If something rake the jacinthe then the jacinthe scour the cybill. If the jacinthe stet the phelia then the jacinthe stet the cybill. If something stet the tana then the tana rake the jacinthe. If something is jamaican and it rake the tana then the tana rake the phelia. The cybill stet the tana.", "logic": "\nRake(phelia, tana)\nRake(jacinthe, cybill)\nStet(jacinthe, phelia)\nRake(cybill, tana)\nEased(cybill)\nLegitimate(cybill)\nTwin(tana)\nforall x (Rake(x, phelia) and Scour(phelia, cybill) -> Scour(cybill, phelia))\nforall x (Stet(x, cybill) -> Stet(cybill, tana))\nLegitimate(tana) and Scour(tana, jacinthe) -> Rake(jacinthe, tana)\nforall x (Scour(x, cybill) and Jamaican(x) -> Rake(x, cybill))\nforall x (Rake(x, jacinthe) -> Scour(jacinthe, cybill))\nStet(jacinthe, phelia) -> Stet(jacinthe, cybill)\nforall x (Stet(x, tana) -> Rake(tana, jacinthe))\nforall x (Jamaican(x) and Rake(x, tana) -> Rake(tana, phelia))\n\nStet(cybill, tana)\n\nStet(jacinthe, phelia) and Stet(jacinthe, phelia) -> Stet(jacinthe, cybill) -> therefore Stet(jacinthe, cybill) Stet(jacinthe, cybill) and forall x (Stet(x, cybill) -> Stet(cybill, tana)) -> therefore Stet(cybill, tana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The charline locomote the emogene. The anthea locomote the rosalia. The anthea sock the charline. The rosalia locomote the emogene. The rosalia is cantabile. The rosalia is olivelike. The emogene is landed. If something locomote the charline and the charline justify the rosalia then the rosalia justify the charline. If something sock the rosalia then the rosalia sock the emogene. If the emogene is olivelike and the emogene justify the anthea then the anthea locomote the emogene. If something justify the rosalia and it is petite then it locomote the rosalia. If something locomote the anthea then the anthea justify the rosalia. If the anthea sock the charline then the anthea sock the rosalia. If something sock the emogene then the emogene locomote the anthea. If something is petite and it locomote the emogene then the emogene locomote the charline. The rosalia does not visit the emogene.", "logic": "\nLocomote(charline, emogene)\nLocomote(anthea, rosalia)\nSock(anthea, charline)\nLocomote(rosalia, emogene)\nCantabile(rosalia)\nOlivelike(rosalia)\nLanded(emogene)\nforall x (Locomote(x, charline) and Justify(charline, rosalia) -> Justify(rosalia, charline))\nforall x (Sock(x, rosalia) -> Sock(rosalia, emogene))\nOlivelike(emogene) and Justify(emogene, anthea) -> Locomote(anthea, emogene)\nforall x (Justify(x, rosalia) and Petite(x) -> Locomote(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Locomote(x, anthea) -> Justify(anthea, rosalia))\nSock(anthea, charline) -> Sock(anthea, rosalia)\nforall x (Sock(x, emogene) -> Locomote(emogene, anthea))\nforall x (Petite(x) and Locomote(x, emogene) -> Locomote(emogene, charline))\n\nnot Sock(rosalia, emogene)\n\nSock(anthea, charline) and Sock(anthea, charline) -> Sock(anthea, rosalia) -> therefore Sock(anthea, rosalia) Sock(anthea, rosalia) and forall x (Sock(x, rosalia) -> Sock(rosalia, emogene)) -> therefore Sock(rosalia, emogene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The cecile flaring the charmain. The ashley flaring the rycca. The ashley snog the cecile. The rycca flaring the charmain. The rycca is resiny. The rycca is codified. The charmain is outsized. If something flaring the cecile and the cecile welcome the rycca then the rycca welcome the cecile. If something snog the rycca then the rycca snog the charmain. If the charmain is codified and the charmain welcome the ashley then the ashley flaring the charmain. If something welcome the rycca and it is flaring then it flaring the rycca. If something flaring the ashley then the ashley welcome the rycca. If the ashley snog the cecile then the ashley snog the rycca. If something snog the charmain then the charmain flaring the ashley. If something is flaring and it flaring the charmain then the charmain flaring the cecile. The charmain flaring the ashley.", "logic": "\nGreen(cecile, charmain)\nGreen(ashley, rycca)\nSnog(ashley, cecile)\nGreen(rycca, charmain)\nResiny(rycca)\nCodified(rycca)\nOutsized(charmain)\nforall x (Green(x, cecile) and Welcome(cecile, rycca) -> Welcome(rycca, cecile))\nforall x (Snog(x, rycca) -> Snog(rycca, charmain))\nCodified(charmain) and Welcome(charmain, ashley) -> Green(ashley, charmain)\nforall x (Welcome(x, rycca) and Flaring(x) -> Green(x, rycca))\nforall x (Green(x, ashley) -> Welcome(ashley, rycca))\nSnog(ashley, cecile) -> Snog(ashley, rycca)\nforall x (Snog(x, charmain) -> Green(charmain, ashley))\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Green(x, charmain) -> Green(charmain, cecile))\n\nGreen(charmain, ashley)\n\nSnog(ashley, cecile) and Snog(ashley, cecile) -> Snog(ashley, rycca) -> therefore Snog(ashley, rycca) Snog(ashley, rycca) and forall x (Snog(x, rycca) -> Snog(rycca, charmain)) -> therefore Snog(rycca, charmain) Snog(rycca, charmain) and forall x (Snog(x, charmain) -> Green(charmain, ashley)) -> therefore Green(charmain, ashley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The elena groove the quillan. The nero groove the raven. The nero suspect the elena. The raven groove the quillan. The raven is secular. The raven is weird. The quillan is travelled. If something groove the elena and the elena highlight the raven then the raven highlight the elena. If something suspect the raven then the raven suspect the quillan. If the quillan is weird and the quillan highlight the nero then the nero groove the quillan. If something highlight the raven and it is infamous then it groove the raven. If something groove the nero then the nero highlight the raven. If the nero suspect the elena then the nero suspect the raven. If something suspect the quillan then the quillan groove the nero. If something is infamous and it groove the quillan then the quillan groove the elena. The quillan does not chase the nero.", "logic": "\nGroove(elena, quillan)\nGroove(nero, raven)\nSuspect(nero, elena)\nGroove(raven, quillan)\nSecular(raven)\nWeird(raven)\nTravelled(quillan)\nforall x (Groove(x, elena) and Highlight(elena, raven) -> Highlight(raven, elena))\nforall x (Suspect(x, raven) -> Suspect(raven, quillan))\nWeird(quillan) and Highlight(quillan, nero) -> Groove(nero, quillan)\nforall x (Highlight(x, raven) and Infamous(x) -> Groove(x, raven))\nforall x (Groove(x, nero) -> Highlight(nero, raven))\nSuspect(nero, elena) -> Suspect(nero, raven)\nforall x (Suspect(x, quillan) -> Groove(quillan, nero))\nforall x (Infamous(x) and Groove(x, quillan) -> Groove(quillan, elena))\n\nnot Groove(quillan, nero)\n\nSuspect(nero, elena) and Suspect(nero, elena) -> Suspect(nero, raven) -> therefore Suspect(nero, raven) Suspect(nero, raven) and forall x (Suspect(x, raven) -> Suspect(raven, quillan)) -> therefore Suspect(raven, quillan) Suspect(raven, quillan) and forall x (Suspect(x, quillan) -> Groove(quillan, nero)) -> therefore Groove(quillan, nero)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The elias compound the tania. The benton compound the roselin. The benton bobble the elias. The roselin compound the tania. The roselin is leftover. The roselin is traceable. The tania is vehicular. If something compound the elias and the elias clobber the roselin then the roselin clobber the elias. If something bobble the roselin then the roselin bobble the tania. If the tania is traceable and the tania clobber the benton then the benton compound the tania. If something clobber the roselin and it is dishonored then it compound the roselin. If something compound the benton then the benton clobber the roselin. If the benton bobble the elias then the benton bobble the roselin. If something bobble the tania then the tania compound the benton. If something is dishonored and it compound the tania then the tania compound the elias. The benton does not chase the tania.", "logic": "\nCompound(elias, tania)\nCompound(benton, roselin)\nBobble(benton, elias)\nCompound(roselin, tania)\nLeftover(roselin)\nTraceable(roselin)\nVehicular(tania)\nforall x (Compound(x, elias) and Clobber(elias, roselin) -> Clobber(roselin, elias))\nforall x (Bobble(x, roselin) -> Bobble(roselin, tania))\nTraceable(tania) and Clobber(tania, benton) -> Compound(benton, tania)\nforall x (Clobber(x, roselin) and Dishonored(x) -> Compound(x, roselin))\nforall x (Compound(x, benton) -> Clobber(benton, roselin))\nBobble(benton, elias) -> Bobble(benton, roselin)\nforall x (Bobble(x, tania) -> Compound(tania, benton))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) and Compound(x, tania) -> Compound(tania, elias))\n\nnot Compound(benton, tania)\n\nTraceable(tania) and Clobber(tania, benton) -> Compound(benton, tania) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The lucretia frog the audry. The selestina frog the glorianna. The selestina convoy the lucretia. The glorianna frog the audry. The glorianna is excursive. The glorianna is durable. The audry is geophytic. If something frog the lucretia and the lucretia label the glorianna then the glorianna label the lucretia. If something convoy the glorianna then the glorianna convoy the audry. If the audry is durable and the audry label the selestina then the selestina frog the audry. If something label the glorianna and it is apogametic then it frog the glorianna. If something frog the selestina then the selestina label the glorianna. If the selestina convoy the lucretia then the selestina convoy the glorianna. If something convoy the audry then the audry frog the selestina. If something is apogametic and it frog the audry then the audry frog the lucretia. The glorianna label the lucretia.", "logic": "\nFrog(lucretia, audry)\nFrog(selestina, glorianna)\nConvoy(selestina, lucretia)\nFrog(glorianna, audry)\nExcursive(glorianna)\nDurable(glorianna)\nGeophytic(audry)\nforall x (Frog(x, lucretia) and Label(lucretia, glorianna) -> Label(glorianna, lucretia))\nforall x (Convoy(x, glorianna) -> Convoy(glorianna, audry))\nDurable(audry) and Label(audry, selestina) -> Frog(selestina, audry)\nforall x (Label(x, glorianna) and Apogametic(x) -> Frog(x, glorianna))\nforall x (Frog(x, selestina) -> Label(selestina, glorianna))\nConvoy(selestina, lucretia) -> Convoy(selestina, glorianna)\nforall x (Convoy(x, audry) -> Frog(audry, selestina))\nforall x (Apogametic(x) and Frog(x, audry) -> Frog(audry, lucretia))\n\nLabel(glorianna, lucretia)\n\nforall x (Frog(x, lucretia) and Label(lucretia, glorianna) -> Label(glorianna, lucretia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The barret greet the katey. The augie greet the cassandre. The augie sorrow the barret. The cassandre greet the katey. The cassandre is conjugal. The cassandre is bisulcate. The katey is nontaxable. If something greet the barret and the barret exuberate the cassandre then the cassandre exuberate the barret. If something sorrow the cassandre then the cassandre sorrow the katey. If the katey is bisulcate and the katey exuberate the augie then the augie greet the katey. If something exuberate the cassandre and it is rigged then it greet the cassandre. If something greet the augie then the augie exuberate the cassandre. If the augie sorrow the barret then the augie sorrow the cassandre. If something sorrow the katey then the katey greet the augie. If something is rigged and it greet the katey then the katey greet the barret. The katey does not chase the cassandre.", "logic": "\nGreet(barret, katey)\nGreet(augie, cassandre)\nSorrow(augie, barret)\nGreet(cassandre, katey)\nConjugal(cassandre)\nBisulcate(cassandre)\nNontaxable(katey)\nforall x (Greet(x, barret) and Exuberate(barret, cassandre) -> Exuberate(cassandre, barret))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, cassandre) -> Sorrow(cassandre, katey))\nBisulcate(katey) and Exuberate(katey, augie) -> Greet(augie, katey)\nforall x (Exuberate(x, cassandre) and Rigged(x) -> Greet(x, cassandre))\nforall x (Greet(x, augie) -> Exuberate(augie, cassandre))\nSorrow(augie, barret) -> Sorrow(augie, cassandre)\nforall x (Sorrow(x, katey) -> Greet(katey, augie))\nforall x (Rigged(x) and Greet(x, katey) -> Greet(katey, barret))\n\nnot Greet(katey, cassandre)\n\nforall x (Exuberate(x, cassandre) and Rigged(x) -> Greet(x, cassandre)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The zolly equip the vivi. The pietro equip the abdul. The pietro panel the zolly. The abdul equip the vivi. The abdul is pandurate. The abdul is argentic. The vivi is hospitable. If something equip the zolly and the zolly degrade the abdul then the abdul degrade the zolly. If something panel the abdul then the abdul panel the vivi. If the vivi is argentic and the vivi degrade the pietro then the pietro equip the vivi. If something degrade the abdul and it is bahai then it equip the abdul. If something equip the pietro then the pietro degrade the abdul. If the pietro panel the zolly then the pietro panel the abdul. If something panel the vivi then the vivi equip the pietro. If something is bahai and it equip the vivi then the vivi equip the zolly. The abdul equip the abdul.", "logic": "\nEquip(zolly, vivi)\nEquip(pietro, abdul)\nPanel(pietro, zolly)\nEquip(abdul, vivi)\nPandurate(abdul)\nArgentic(abdul)\nHospitable(vivi)\nforall x (Equip(x, zolly) and Degrade(zolly, abdul) -> Degrade(abdul, zolly))\nforall x (Panel(x, abdul) -> Panel(abdul, vivi))\nArgentic(vivi) and Degrade(vivi, pietro) -> Equip(pietro, vivi)\nforall x (Degrade(x, abdul) and Bahai(x) -> Equip(x, abdul))\nforall x (Equip(x, pietro) -> Degrade(pietro, abdul))\nPanel(pietro, zolly) -> Panel(pietro, abdul)\nforall x (Panel(x, vivi) -> Equip(vivi, pietro))\nforall x (Bahai(x) and Equip(x, vivi) -> Equip(vivi, zolly))\n\nEquip(abdul, abdul)\n\nforall x (Degrade(x, abdul) and Bahai(x) -> Equip(x, abdul)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The mortie relace the zelma. The keely relace the edi. The keely dimension the mortie. The edi relace the zelma. The edi is undatable. The edi is dissected. The zelma is extrusive. If something relace the mortie and the mortie collapse the edi then the edi collapse the mortie. If something dimension the edi then the edi dimension the zelma. If the zelma is dissected and the zelma collapse the keely then the keely relace the zelma. If something collapse the edi and it is deciphered then it relace the edi. If something relace the keely then the keely collapse the edi. If the keely dimension the mortie then the keely dimension the edi. If something dimension the zelma then the zelma relace the keely. If something is deciphered and it relace the zelma then the zelma relace the mortie. The keely is not undatable.", "logic": "\nRelace(mortie, zelma)\nRelace(keely, edi)\nDimension(keely, mortie)\nRelace(edi, zelma)\nUndatable(edi)\nDissected(edi)\nExtrusive(zelma)\nforall x (Relace(x, mortie) and Collapse(mortie, edi) -> Collapse(edi, mortie))\nforall x (Dimension(x, edi) -> Dimension(edi, zelma))\nDissected(zelma) and Collapse(zelma, keely) -> Relace(keely, zelma)\nforall x (Collapse(x, edi) and Deciphered(x) -> Relace(x, edi))\nforall x (Relace(x, keely) -> Collapse(keely, edi))\nDimension(keely, mortie) -> Dimension(keely, edi)\nforall x (Dimension(x, zelma) -> Relace(zelma, keely))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Relace(x, zelma) -> Relace(zelma, mortie))\n\nnot Undatable(keely)\n\nnot Undatable(keely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The averil mention the liorah. The cindee mention the marybeth. The cindee mound the averil. The marybeth mention the liorah. The marybeth is abroach. The marybeth is coaxial. The liorah is beneficed. If something mention the averil and the averil stain the marybeth then the marybeth stain the averil. If something mound the marybeth then the marybeth mound the liorah. If the liorah is coaxial and the liorah stain the cindee then the cindee mention the liorah. If something stain the marybeth and it is needless then it mention the marybeth. If something mention the cindee then the cindee stain the marybeth. If the cindee mound the averil then the cindee mound the marybeth. If something mound the liorah then the liorah mention the cindee. If something is needless and it mention the liorah then the liorah mention the averil. The liorah is abroach.", "logic": "\nMention(averil, liorah)\nMention(cindee, marybeth)\nMound(cindee, averil)\nMention(marybeth, liorah)\nAbroach(marybeth)\nCoaxial(marybeth)\nBeneficed(liorah)\nforall x (Mention(x, averil) and Stain(averil, marybeth) -> Stain(marybeth, averil))\nforall x (Mound(x, marybeth) -> Mound(marybeth, liorah))\nCoaxial(liorah) and Stain(liorah, cindee) -> Mention(cindee, liorah)\nforall x (Stain(x, marybeth) and Needless(x) -> Mention(x, marybeth))\nforall x (Mention(x, cindee) -> Stain(cindee, marybeth))\nMound(cindee, averil) -> Mound(cindee, marybeth)\nforall x (Mound(x, liorah) -> Mention(liorah, cindee))\nforall x (Needless(x) and Mention(x, liorah) -> Mention(liorah, averil))\n\nAbroach(liorah)\n\nAbroach(liorah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The marrilee cosponsor the englebart. The forrest cosponsor the ikey. The forrest deliquesce the marrilee. The ikey cosponsor the englebart. The ikey is blotchy. The ikey is subscribed. The englebart is austenitic. If something cosponsor the marrilee and the marrilee sunburn the ikey then the ikey sunburn the marrilee. If something deliquesce the ikey then the ikey deliquesce the englebart. If the englebart is subscribed and the englebart sunburn the forrest then the forrest cosponsor the englebart. If something sunburn the ikey and it is futile then it cosponsor the ikey. If something cosponsor the forrest then the forrest sunburn the ikey. If the forrest deliquesce the marrilee then the forrest deliquesce the ikey. If something deliquesce the englebart then the englebart cosponsor the forrest. If something is futile and it cosponsor the englebart then the englebart cosponsor the marrilee. The ikey is not austenitic.", "logic": "\nCosponsor(marrilee, englebart)\nCosponsor(forrest, ikey)\nDeliquesce(forrest, marrilee)\nCosponsor(ikey, englebart)\nBlotchy(ikey)\nSubscribed(ikey)\nAustenitic(englebart)\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, marrilee) and Sunburn(marrilee, ikey) -> Sunburn(ikey, marrilee))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, ikey) -> Deliquesce(ikey, englebart))\nSubscribed(englebart) and Sunburn(englebart, forrest) -> Cosponsor(forrest, englebart)\nforall x (Sunburn(x, ikey) and Futile(x) -> Cosponsor(x, ikey))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, forrest) -> Sunburn(forrest, ikey))\nDeliquesce(forrest, marrilee) -> Deliquesce(forrest, ikey)\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, englebart) -> Cosponsor(englebart, forrest))\nforall x (Futile(x) and Cosponsor(x, englebart) -> Cosponsor(englebart, marrilee))\n\nnot Austenitic(ikey)\n\nnot Austenitic(ikey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The tilly ensconce the peri. The cybill ensconce the percy. The cybill stint the tilly. The percy ensconce the peri. The percy is chelate. The percy is stylish. The peri is staple. If something ensconce the tilly and the tilly depict the percy then the percy depict the tilly. If something stint the percy then the percy stint the peri. If the peri is stylish and the peri depict the cybill then the cybill ensconce the peri. If something depict the percy and it is shackled then it ensconce the percy. If something ensconce the cybill then the cybill depict the percy. If the cybill stint the tilly then the cybill stint the percy. If something stint the peri then the peri ensconce the cybill. If something is shackled and it ensconce the peri then the peri ensconce the tilly. The tilly is shackled.", "logic": "\nEnsconce(tilly, peri)\nEnsconce(cybill, percy)\nStint(cybill, tilly)\nEnsconce(percy, peri)\nChelate(percy)\nStylish(percy)\nStaple(peri)\nforall x (Ensconce(x, tilly) and Depict(tilly, percy) -> Depict(percy, tilly))\nforall x (Stint(x, percy) -> Stint(percy, peri))\nStylish(peri) and Depict(peri, cybill) -> Ensconce(cybill, peri)\nforall x (Depict(x, percy) and Shackled(x) -> Ensconce(x, percy))\nforall x (Ensconce(x, cybill) -> Depict(cybill, percy))\nStint(cybill, tilly) -> Stint(cybill, percy)\nforall x (Stint(x, peri) -> Ensconce(peri, cybill))\nforall x (Shackled(x) and Ensconce(x, peri) -> Ensconce(peri, tilly))\n\nShackled(tilly)\n\nShackled(tilly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "Lilith is not adducent. Shorty is attainable. Shorty is cercarial. Shorty is not achy. Shorty is bulgy. Shorty is not appointive. Shorty is settled. Dallas is appointive. Carmelina is adducent. Carmelina is cercarial. All cercarial, achy things are bulgy. If something is appointive and not cercarial then it is not bulgy. All bulgy, achy things are attainable. All appointive, cercarial things are adducent. All adducent things are achy. If something is appointive then it is not achy. Shorty is bulgy.", "logic": "\nnot Adducent(lilith)\nAttainable(shorty)\nCercarial(shorty)\nnot Achy(shorty)\nBulgy(shorty)\nnot Appointive(shorty)\nSettled(shorty)\nAppointive(dallas)\nAdducent(carmelina)\nCercarial(carmelina)\nforall x (Cercarial(x) and Achy(x) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Appointive(x) and not Cercarial(x) -> not Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Bulgy(x) and Achy(x) -> Attainable(x))\nforall x (Appointive(x) and Cercarial(x) -> Adducent(x))\nforall x (Adducent(x) -> Achy(x))\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> not Achy(x))\n\nBulgy(shorty)\n\ntherefore Bulgy(shorty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Damita is not dozy. Leoline is gonadal. Leoline is corneal. Leoline is not inebriated. Leoline is dorsal. Leoline is not blindfold. Leoline is humourless. Ronen is blindfold. Rose is dozy. Rose is corneal. All corneal, inebriated things are dorsal. If something is blindfold and not corneal then it is not dorsal. All dorsal, inebriated things are gonadal. All blindfold, corneal things are dozy. All dozy things are inebriated. If something is blindfold then it is not inebriated. Rose is not corneal.", "logic": "\nnot Dozy(damita)\nGonadal(leoline)\nCorneal(leoline)\nnot Inebriated(leoline)\nDorsal(leoline)\nnot Blindfold(leoline)\nHumourless(leoline)\nBlindfold(ronen)\nDozy(rose)\nCorneal(rose)\nforall x (Corneal(x) and Inebriated(x) -> Dorsal(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) and not Corneal(x) -> not Dorsal(x))\nforall x (Dorsal(x) and Inebriated(x) -> Gonadal(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) and Corneal(x) -> Dozy(x))\nforall x (Dozy(x) -> Inebriated(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) -> not Inebriated(x))\n\nnot Corneal(rose)\n\ntherefore Corneal(rose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Leonardo is not ignitable. Minnie is tribal. Minnie is unquotable. Minnie is not capetian. Minnie is enzootic. Minnie is not misplaced. Minnie is undyed. Tish is misplaced. Robina is ignitable. Robina is unquotable. All unquotable, capetian things are enzootic. If something is misplaced and not unquotable then it is not enzootic. All enzootic, capetian things are tribal. All misplaced, unquotable things are ignitable. All ignitable things are capetian. If something is misplaced then it is not capetian. Robina is capetian.", "logic": "\nnot Ignitable(leonardo)\nTribal(minnie)\nUnquotable(minnie)\nnot Capetian(minnie)\nEnzootic(minnie)\nnot Misplaced(minnie)\nUndyed(minnie)\nMisplaced(tish)\nIgnitable(robina)\nUnquotable(robina)\nforall x (Unquotable(x) and Capetian(x) -> Enzootic(x))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) and not Unquotable(x) -> not Enzootic(x))\nforall x (Enzootic(x) and Capetian(x) -> Tribal(x))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) and Unquotable(x) -> Ignitable(x))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) -> Capetian(x))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) -> not Capetian(x))\n\nCapetian(robina)\n\nIgnitable(robina) and forall x (Ignitable(x) -> Capetian(x)) -> therefore Capetian(robina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Ritch is not astute. Issy is coniferous. Issy is zoftig. Issy is not plethoric. Issy is coetaneous. Issy is not pyrolignic. Issy is glabrous. Ken is pyrolignic. Zelda is astute. Zelda is zoftig. All zoftig, plethoric things are coetaneous. If something is pyrolignic and not zoftig then it is not coetaneous. All coetaneous, plethoric things are coniferous. All pyrolignic, zoftig things are astute. All astute things are plethoric. If something is pyrolignic then it is not plethoric. Zelda is not plethoric.", "logic": "\nnot Astute(ritch)\nConiferous(issy)\nZoftig(issy)\nnot Plethoric(issy)\nCoetaneous(issy)\nnot Pyrolignic(issy)\nGlabrous(issy)\nPyrolignic(ken)\nAstute(zelda)\nZoftig(zelda)\nforall x (Zoftig(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Coetaneous(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and not Zoftig(x) -> not Coetaneous(x))\nforall x (Coetaneous(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Coniferous(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and Zoftig(x) -> Astute(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> not Plethoric(x))\n\nnot Plethoric(zelda)\n\nAstute(zelda) and forall x (Astute(x) -> Plethoric(x)) -> therefore Plethoric(zelda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Dionis is not dantesque. Rosaline is lactic. Rosaline is weightless. Rosaline is not probative. Rosaline is mental. Rosaline is not headed. Rosaline is erose. Niven is headed. Siward is dantesque. Siward is weightless. All weightless, probative things are mental. If something is headed and not weightless then it is not mental. All mental, probative things are lactic. All headed, weightless things are dantesque. All dantesque things are probative. If something is headed then it is not probative. Siward is mental.", "logic": "\nnot Dantesque(dionis)\nLactic(rosaline)\nWeightless(rosaline)\nnot Probative(rosaline)\nMental(rosaline)\nnot Headed(rosaline)\nErose(rosaline)\nHeaded(niven)\nDantesque(siward)\nWeightless(siward)\nforall x (Weightless(x) and Probative(x) -> Mental(x))\nforall x (Headed(x) and not Weightless(x) -> not Mental(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) and Probative(x) -> Lactic(x))\nforall x (Headed(x) and Weightless(x) -> Dantesque(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Probative(x))\nforall x (Headed(x) -> not Probative(x))\n\nMental(siward)\n\nDantesque(siward) and forall x (Dantesque(x) -> Probative(x)) -> therefore Probative(siward) Weightless(siward) and Probative(siward) and forall x (Weightless(x) and Probative(x) -> Mental(x)) -> therefore Mental(siward)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Gusella is not undeterred. Sid is enveloping. Sid is paid. Sid is not unsmooth. Sid is unselfish. Sid is not ninepenny. Sid is untuneful. Englebert is ninepenny. Graeme is undeterred. Graeme is paid. All paid, unsmooth things are unselfish. If something is ninepenny and not paid then it is not unselfish. All unselfish, unsmooth things are enveloping. All ninepenny, paid things are undeterred. All undeterred things are unsmooth. If something is ninepenny then it is not unsmooth. Graeme is not unselfish.", "logic": "\nnot Undeterred(gusella)\nEnveloping(sid)\nPaid(sid)\nnot Unsmooth(sid)\nUnselfish(sid)\nnot Ninepenny(sid)\nUntuneful(sid)\nNinepenny(englebert)\nUndeterred(graeme)\nPaid(graeme)\nforall x (Paid(x) and Unsmooth(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Ninepenny(x) and not Paid(x) -> not Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Unselfish(x) and Unsmooth(x) -> Enveloping(x))\nforall x (Ninepenny(x) and Paid(x) -> Undeterred(x))\nforall x (Undeterred(x) -> Unsmooth(x))\nforall x (Ninepenny(x) -> not Unsmooth(x))\n\nnot Unselfish(graeme)\n\nUndeterred(graeme) and forall x (Undeterred(x) -> Unsmooth(x)) -> therefore Unsmooth(graeme) Paid(graeme) and Unsmooth(graeme) and forall x (Paid(x) and Unsmooth(x) -> Unselfish(x)) -> therefore Unselfish(graeme)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Waleed is not burdenless. Harwell is archival. Harwell is stomachic. Harwell is not downstairs. Harwell is undeserved. Harwell is not unrivaled. Harwell is fatherlike. Beret is unrivaled. Graehme is burdenless. Graehme is stomachic. All stomachic, downstairs things are undeserved. If something is unrivaled and not stomachic then it is not undeserved. All undeserved, downstairs things are archival. All unrivaled, stomachic things are burdenless. All burdenless things are downstairs. If something is unrivaled then it is not downstairs. Graehme is archival.", "logic": "\nnot Burdenless(waleed)\nArchival(harwell)\nStomachic(harwell)\nnot Downstairs(harwell)\nUndeserved(harwell)\nnot Unrivaled(harwell)\nFatherlike(harwell)\nUnrivaled(beret)\nBurdenless(graehme)\nStomachic(graehme)\nforall x (Stomachic(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Unrivaled(x) and not Stomachic(x) -> not Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Undeserved(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Unrivaled(x) and Stomachic(x) -> Burdenless(x))\nforall x (Burdenless(x) -> Downstairs(x))\nforall x (Unrivaled(x) -> not Downstairs(x))\n\nArchival(graehme)\n\nBurdenless(graehme) and forall x (Burdenless(x) -> Downstairs(x)) -> therefore Downstairs(graehme) Stomachic(graehme) and Downstairs(graehme) and forall x (Stomachic(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Undeserved(x)) -> therefore Undeserved(graehme) Burdenless(graehme) and forall x (Burdenless(x) -> Downstairs(x)) -> therefore Downstairs(graehme) Undeserved(graehme) and Downstairs(graehme) and forall x (Undeserved(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Archival(x)) -> therefore Archival(graehme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Merissa is not powerful. Stephi is unbridled. Stephi is odourless. Stephi is not precordial. Stephi is seasonal. Stephi is not cavalier. Stephi is unattached. Gael is cavalier. Yard is powerful. Yard is odourless. All odourless, precordial things are seasonal. If something is cavalier and not odourless then it is not seasonal. All seasonal, precordial things are unbridled. All cavalier, odourless things are powerful. All powerful things are precordial. If something is cavalier then it is not precordial. Yard is not unbridled.", "logic": "\nnot Powerful(merissa)\nUnbridled(stephi)\nOdourless(stephi)\nnot Precordial(stephi)\nSeasonal(stephi)\nnot Cavalier(stephi)\nUnattached(stephi)\nCavalier(gael)\nPowerful(yard)\nOdourless(yard)\nforall x (Odourless(x) and Precordial(x) -> Seasonal(x))\nforall x (Cavalier(x) and not Odourless(x) -> not Seasonal(x))\nforall x (Seasonal(x) and Precordial(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nforall x (Cavalier(x) and Odourless(x) -> Powerful(x))\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> Precordial(x))\nforall x (Cavalier(x) -> not Precordial(x))\n\nnot Unbridled(yard)\n\nPowerful(yard) and forall x (Powerful(x) -> Precordial(x)) -> therefore Precordial(yard) Odourless(yard) and Precordial(yard) and forall x (Odourless(x) and Precordial(x) -> Seasonal(x)) -> therefore Seasonal(yard) Powerful(yard) and forall x (Powerful(x) -> Precordial(x)) -> therefore Precordial(yard) Seasonal(yard) and Precordial(yard) and forall x (Seasonal(x) and Precordial(x) -> Unbridled(x)) -> therefore Unbridled(yard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Willi is not dicky. Floyd is roomy. Floyd is damaged. Floyd is not sprigged. Floyd is auctorial. Floyd is not priggish. Floyd is unimposing. Ignace is priggish. Henry is dicky. Henry is damaged. All damaged, sprigged things are auctorial. If something is priggish and not damaged then it is not auctorial. All auctorial, sprigged things are roomy. All priggish, damaged things are dicky. All dicky things are sprigged. If something is priggish then it is not sprigged. Ignace is not roomy.", "logic": "\nnot Dicky(willi)\nRoomy(floyd)\nDamaged(floyd)\nnot Sprigged(floyd)\nAuctorial(floyd)\nnot Priggish(floyd)\nUnimposing(floyd)\nPriggish(ignace)\nDicky(henry)\nDamaged(henry)\nforall x (Damaged(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nforall x (Priggish(x) and not Damaged(x) -> not Auctorial(x))\nforall x (Auctorial(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Roomy(x))\nforall x (Priggish(x) and Damaged(x) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Priggish(x) -> not Sprigged(x))\n\nnot Roomy(ignace)\n\nforall x (Auctorial(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Roomy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Elayne is not anaphoric. Walt is jilted. Walt is bantam. Walt is not glutinous. Walt is gilded. Walt is not andalusian. Walt is serene. Annadiana is andalusian. Bennet is anaphoric. Bennet is bantam. All bantam, glutinous things are gilded. If something is andalusian and not bantam then it is not gilded. All gilded, glutinous things are jilted. All andalusian, bantam things are anaphoric. All anaphoric things are glutinous. If something is andalusian then it is not glutinous. Walt is anaphoric.", "logic": "\nnot Anaphoric(elayne)\nJilted(walt)\nBantam(walt)\nnot Glutinous(walt)\nGilded(walt)\nnot Andalusian(walt)\nSerene(walt)\nAndalusian(annadiana)\nAnaphoric(bennet)\nBantam(bennet)\nforall x (Bantam(x) and Glutinous(x) -> Gilded(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and not Bantam(x) -> not Gilded(x))\nforall x (Gilded(x) and Glutinous(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Bantam(x) -> Anaphoric(x))\nforall x (Anaphoric(x) -> Glutinous(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> not Glutinous(x))\n\nAnaphoric(walt)\n\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Bantam(x) -> Anaphoric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Vitoria is not grateful. Lona is palpebrate. Lona is whacked. Lona is not divinatory. Lona is crosswise. Lona is not drinkable. Lona is earthborn. Sherilyn is drinkable. Kathlin is grateful. Kathlin is whacked. All whacked, divinatory things are crosswise. If something is drinkable and not whacked then it is not crosswise. All crosswise, divinatory things are palpebrate. All drinkable, whacked things are grateful. All grateful things are divinatory. If something is drinkable then it is not divinatory. Vitoria is not divinatory.", "logic": "\nnot Grateful(vitoria)\nPalpebrate(lona)\nWhacked(lona)\nnot Divinatory(lona)\nCrosswise(lona)\nnot Drinkable(lona)\nEarthborn(lona)\nDrinkable(sherilyn)\nGrateful(kathlin)\nWhacked(kathlin)\nforall x (Whacked(x) and Divinatory(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and not Whacked(x) -> not Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and Divinatory(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and Whacked(x) -> Grateful(x))\nforall x (Grateful(x) -> Divinatory(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) -> not Divinatory(x))\n\nnot Divinatory(vitoria)\n\nforall x (Grateful(x) -> Divinatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Adelle is not discerning. Felecia is hemostatic. Felecia is inapt. Felecia is not astute. Felecia is truncated. Felecia is not peccable. Felecia is poor. Alexis is peccable. Hartwell is discerning. Hartwell is inapt. All inapt, astute things are truncated. If something is peccable and not inapt then it is not truncated. All truncated, astute things are hemostatic. All peccable, inapt things are discerning. All discerning things are astute. If something is peccable then it is not astute. Adelle is truncated.", "logic": "\nnot Discerning(adelle)\nHemostatic(felecia)\nInapt(felecia)\nnot Astute(felecia)\nTruncated(felecia)\nnot Peccable(felecia)\nPoor(felecia)\nPeccable(alexis)\nDiscerning(hartwell)\nInapt(hartwell)\nforall x (Inapt(x) and Astute(x) -> Truncated(x))\nforall x (Peccable(x) and not Inapt(x) -> not Truncated(x))\nforall x (Truncated(x) and Astute(x) -> Hemostatic(x))\nforall x (Peccable(x) and Inapt(x) -> Discerning(x))\nforall x (Discerning(x) -> Astute(x))\nforall x (Peccable(x) -> not Astute(x))\n\nTruncated(adelle)\n\nforall x (Inapt(x) and Astute(x) -> Truncated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Marje is not beastly. Darda is rancid. Darda is animistic. Darda is not untroubled. Darda is immoderate. Darda is not basophilic. Darda is pouring. Englebert is basophilic. Britta is beastly. Britta is animistic. All animistic, untroubled things are immoderate. If something is basophilic and not animistic then it is not immoderate. All immoderate, untroubled things are rancid. All basophilic, animistic things are beastly. All beastly things are untroubled. If something is basophilic then it is not untroubled. Marje is not pouring.", "logic": "\nnot Beastly(marje)\nRancid(darda)\nAnimistic(darda)\nnot Untroubled(darda)\nImmoderate(darda)\nnot Basophilic(darda)\nPouring(darda)\nBasophilic(englebert)\nBeastly(britta)\nAnimistic(britta)\nforall x (Animistic(x) and Untroubled(x) -> Immoderate(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) and not Animistic(x) -> not Immoderate(x))\nforall x (Immoderate(x) and Untroubled(x) -> Rancid(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) and Animistic(x) -> Beastly(x))\nforall x (Beastly(x) -> Untroubled(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) -> not Untroubled(x))\n\nnot Pouring(marje)\n\nnot Pouring(marje) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Erhard is not potent. Lucille is capsulated. Lucille is friendless. Lucille is not viable. Lucille is landless. Lucille is not faint. Lucille is grouchy. Ellynn is faint. Annice is potent. Annice is friendless. All friendless, viable things are landless. If something is faint and not friendless then it is not landless. All landless, viable things are capsulated. All faint, friendless things are potent. All potent things are viable. If something is faint then it is not viable. Annice is grouchy.", "logic": "\nnot Potent(erhard)\nCapsulated(lucille)\nFriendless(lucille)\nnot Viable(lucille)\nLandless(lucille)\nnot Faint(lucille)\nGrouchy(lucille)\nFaint(ellynn)\nPotent(annice)\nFriendless(annice)\nforall x (Friendless(x) and Viable(x) -> Landless(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and not Friendless(x) -> not Landless(x))\nforall x (Landless(x) and Viable(x) -> Capsulated(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and Friendless(x) -> Potent(x))\nforall x (Potent(x) -> Viable(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) -> not Viable(x))\n\nGrouchy(annice)\n\nGrouchy(annice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Dania is not botulinal. Muriel is abrasive. Muriel is autolytic. Muriel is not acetic. Muriel is boronic. Muriel is not meager. Muriel is hypnotic. Barbi is meager. Jenna is botulinal. Jenna is autolytic. All autolytic, acetic things are boronic. If something is meager and not autolytic then it is not boronic. All boronic, acetic things are abrasive. All meager, autolytic things are botulinal. All botulinal things are acetic. If something is meager then it is not acetic. Barbi is not autolytic.", "logic": "\nnot Botulinal(dania)\nAbrasive(muriel)\nAutolytic(muriel)\nnot Acetic(muriel)\nBoronic(muriel)\nnot Meager(muriel)\nHypnotic(muriel)\nMeager(barbi)\nBotulinal(jenna)\nAutolytic(jenna)\nforall x (Autolytic(x) and Acetic(x) -> Boronic(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) and not Autolytic(x) -> not Boronic(x))\nforall x (Boronic(x) and Acetic(x) -> Abrasive(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) and Autolytic(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Acetic(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) -> not Acetic(x))\n\nnot Autolytic(barbi)\n\nnot Autolytic(barbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Noland is not abandoned. Julio is erogenous. Julio is ninefold. Julio is not ethnical. Julio is bimetallic. Julio is not murmuring. Julio is fossorial. Charmane is murmuring. Gerty is abandoned. Gerty is ninefold. All ninefold, ethnical things are bimetallic. If something is murmuring and not ninefold then it is not bimetallic. All bimetallic, ethnical things are erogenous. All murmuring, ninefold things are abandoned. All abandoned things are ethnical. If something is murmuring then it is not ethnical. Charmane is fossorial.", "logic": "\nnot Abandoned(noland)\nErogenous(julio)\nNinefold(julio)\nnot Ethnical(julio)\nBimetallic(julio)\nnot Murmuring(julio)\nFossorial(julio)\nMurmuring(charmane)\nAbandoned(gerty)\nNinefold(gerty)\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Bimetallic(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) and not Ninefold(x) -> not Bimetallic(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Abandoned(x))\nforall x (Abandoned(x) -> Ethnical(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) -> not Ethnical(x))\n\nFossorial(charmane)\n\nFossorial(charmane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "The calvin is inoperable. If someone is humorless and not inoperable then they are foliaged. Round people are foliaged. If someone is eyeless then they are humorless. Nice, foliaged people are humorless. If someone is foliaged then they are circinate. If the calvin is inoperable then the calvin is eyeless. The calvin is inoperable.", "logic": "\nInoperable(calvin)\nforall x (Humorless(x) and not Inoperable(x) -> Foliaged(x))\nforall x (Eyeless(x) -> Foliaged(x))\nforall x (Eyeless(x) -> Humorless(x))\nforall x (Circinate(x) and Foliaged(x) -> Humorless(x))\nforall x (Foliaged(x) -> Circinate(x))\nInoperable(calvin) -> Eyeless(calvin)\n\nInoperable(calvin)\n\ntherefore Inoperable(calvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The orella is austral. If someone is main and not austral then they are rustling. Round people are rustling. If someone is repentant then they are main. Nice, rustling people are main. If someone is rustling then they are dastardly. If the orella is austral then the orella is repentant. The orella is not austral.", "logic": "\nAustral(orella)\nforall x (Main(x) and not Austral(x) -> Rustling(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Rustling(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Main(x))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) and Rustling(x) -> Main(x))\nforall x (Rustling(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nAustral(orella) -> Repentant(orella)\n\nnot Austral(orella)\n\ntherefore Austral(orella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The meara is spiderly. If someone is auditive and not spiderly then they are shopsoiled. Round people are shopsoiled. If someone is minty then they are auditive. Nice, shopsoiled people are auditive. If someone is shopsoiled then they are monitory. If the meara is spiderly then the meara is minty. The meara is minty.", "logic": "\nSpiderly(meara)\nforall x (Auditive(x) and not Spiderly(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Auditive(x))\nforall x (Monitory(x) and Shopsoiled(x) -> Auditive(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Monitory(x))\nSpiderly(meara) -> Minty(meara)\n\nMinty(meara)\n\nSpiderly(meara) and Spiderly(meara) -> Minty(meara) -> therefore Minty(meara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The trenna is meek. If someone is stylised and not meek then they are despised. Round people are despised. If someone is pathogenic then they are stylised. Nice, despised people are stylised. If someone is despised then they are wildcat. If the trenna is meek then the trenna is pathogenic. The trenna is not pathogenic.", "logic": "\nMeek(trenna)\nforall x (Stylised(x) and not Meek(x) -> Despised(x))\nforall x (Pathogenic(x) -> Despised(x))\nforall x (Pathogenic(x) -> Stylised(x))\nforall x (Wildcat(x) and Despised(x) -> Stylised(x))\nforall x (Despised(x) -> Wildcat(x))\nMeek(trenna) -> Pathogenic(trenna)\n\nnot Pathogenic(trenna)\n\nMeek(trenna) and Meek(trenna) -> Pathogenic(trenna) -> therefore Pathogenic(trenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The debbra is contrary. If someone is reluctant and not contrary then they are apodictic. Round people are apodictic. If someone is wheezy then they are reluctant. Nice, apodictic people are reluctant. If someone is apodictic then they are monaural. If the debbra is contrary then the debbra is wheezy. The debbra is apodictic.", "logic": "\nContrary(debbra)\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and not Contrary(x) -> Apodictic(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Apodictic(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Reluctant(x))\nforall x (Monaural(x) and Apodictic(x) -> Reluctant(x))\nforall x (Apodictic(x) -> Monaural(x))\nContrary(debbra) -> Wheezy(debbra)\n\nApodictic(debbra)\n\nContrary(debbra) and Contrary(debbra) -> Wheezy(debbra) -> therefore Wheezy(debbra) Wheezy(debbra) and forall x (Wheezy(x) -> Apodictic(x)) -> therefore Apodictic(debbra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The dimitris is dashed. If someone is silklike and not dashed then they are defendable. Round people are defendable. If someone is sloped then they are silklike. Nice, defendable people are silklike. If someone is defendable then they are earliest. If the dimitris is dashed then the dimitris is sloped. The dimitris is not silklike.", "logic": "\nDashed(dimitris)\nforall x (Silklike(x) and not Dashed(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) and Defendable(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Defendable(x) -> Earliest(x))\nDashed(dimitris) -> Sloped(dimitris)\n\nnot Silklike(dimitris)\n\nDashed(dimitris) and Dashed(dimitris) -> Sloped(dimitris) -> therefore Sloped(dimitris) Sloped(dimitris) and forall x (Sloped(x) -> Silklike(x)) -> therefore Silklike(dimitris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The laird is deflated. If someone is briny and not deflated then they are braless. Round people are braless. If someone is retracted then they are briny. Nice, braless people are briny. If someone is braless then they are berserk. If the laird is deflated then the laird is retracted. The laird is berserk.", "logic": "\nDeflated(laird)\nforall x (Briny(x) and not Deflated(x) -> Braless(x))\nforall x (Retracted(x) -> Braless(x))\nforall x (Retracted(x) -> Briny(x))\nforall x (Berserk(x) and Braless(x) -> Briny(x))\nforall x (Braless(x) -> Berserk(x))\nDeflated(laird) -> Retracted(laird)\n\nBerserk(laird)\n\nDeflated(laird) and Deflated(laird) -> Retracted(laird) -> therefore Retracted(laird) Retracted(laird) and forall x (Retracted(x) -> Braless(x)) -> therefore Braless(laird) Braless(laird) and forall x (Braless(x) -> Berserk(x)) -> therefore Berserk(laird)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The eleanore is botryoidal. If someone is singable and not botryoidal then they are connective. Round people are connective. If someone is assuring then they are singable. Nice, connective people are singable. If someone is connective then they are satiny. If the eleanore is botryoidal then the eleanore is assuring. The eleanore is not satiny.", "logic": "\nBotryoidal(eleanore)\nforall x (Singable(x) and not Botryoidal(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Assuring(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Assuring(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Satiny(x) and Connective(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Connective(x) -> Satiny(x))\nBotryoidal(eleanore) -> Assuring(eleanore)\n\nnot Satiny(eleanore)\n\nBotryoidal(eleanore) and Botryoidal(eleanore) -> Assuring(eleanore) -> therefore Assuring(eleanore) Assuring(eleanore) and forall x (Assuring(x) -> Connective(x)) -> therefore Connective(eleanore) Connective(eleanore) and forall x (Connective(x) -> Satiny(x)) -> therefore Satiny(eleanore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The rosalia is swingy. If someone is bracing and not swingy then they are fanned. Round people are fanned. If someone is paying then they are bracing. Nice, fanned people are bracing. If someone is fanned then they are salted. If the rosalia is swingy then the rosalia is paying. The rosalia does not eat the rosalia.", "logic": "\nSwingy(rosalia)\nforall x (Bracing(x) and not Swingy(x) -> Fanned(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Fanned(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Bracing(x))\nforall x (Salted(x) and Fanned(x) -> Bracing(x))\nforall x (Fanned(x) -> Salted(x))\nSwingy(rosalia) -> Paying(rosalia)\n\nnot Eats(rosalia, rosalia)\n\nnot Eats(rosalia, rosalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The xylia is horrific. If someone is campy and not horrific then they are forficate. Round people are forficate. If someone is flinty then they are campy. Nice, forficate people are campy. If someone is forficate then they are uncertain. If the xylia is horrific then the xylia is flinty. The xylia chases the xylia.", "logic": "\nHorrific(xylia)\nforall x (Campy(x) and not Horrific(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Campy(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and Forficate(x) -> Campy(x))\nforall x (Forficate(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nHorrific(xylia) -> Flinty(xylia)\n\nChases(xylia, xylia)\n\nChases(xylia, xylia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "Cheri is miserable. Cheri is derivable. Cheri is revokable. Quiet, derivable things are clxxv. If something is grapey then it is phrasal. Blue things are shinto. If something is derivable and miserable then it is clxxv. If something is clxxv then it is grapey. All clxxv things are revokable. If something is grapey and miserable then it is derivable. Nice, phrasal things are revokable. Cheri is miserable.", "logic": "\nMiserable(cheri)\nDerivable(cheri)\nRevokable(cheri)\nforall x (Revokable(x) and Derivable(x) -> Clxxv(x))\nforall x (Grapey(x) -> Phrasal(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) and Miserable(x) -> Clxxv(x))\nforall x (Clxxv(x) -> Grapey(x))\nforall x (Clxxv(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Grapey(x) and Miserable(x) -> Derivable(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) and Phrasal(x) -> Revokable(x))\n\nMiserable(cheri)\n\ntherefore Miserable(cheri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Lynnett is uncrowded. Lynnett is stooping. Lynnett is ascitic. Quiet, stooping things are evacuant. If something is tasseled then it is joking. Blue things are katharobic. If something is stooping and uncrowded then it is evacuant. If something is evacuant then it is tasseled. All evacuant things are ascitic. If something is tasseled and uncrowded then it is stooping. Nice, joking things are ascitic. Lynnett is not stooping.", "logic": "\nUncrowded(lynnett)\nStooping(lynnett)\nAscitic(lynnett)\nforall x (Ascitic(x) and Stooping(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Katharobic(x))\nforall x (Stooping(x) and Uncrowded(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) -> Ascitic(x))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Uncrowded(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Stooping(x) and Joking(x) -> Ascitic(x))\n\nnot Stooping(lynnett)\n\ntherefore Stooping(lynnett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Misty is sleeveless. Misty is crusty. Misty is offhanded. Quiet, crusty things are raiding. If something is payable then it is fecal. Blue things are denatured. If something is crusty and sleeveless then it is raiding. If something is raiding then it is payable. All raiding things are offhanded. If something is payable and sleeveless then it is crusty. Nice, fecal things are offhanded. Misty is raiding.", "logic": "\nSleeveless(misty)\nCrusty(misty)\nOffhanded(misty)\nforall x (Offhanded(x) and Crusty(x) -> Raiding(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Fecal(x))\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Denatured(x))\nforall x (Crusty(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Raiding(x))\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> Payable(x))\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Crusty(x))\nforall x (Crusty(x) and Fecal(x) -> Offhanded(x))\n\nRaiding(misty)\n\nCrusty(misty) and Sleeveless(misty) and forall x (Crusty(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Raiding(x)) -> therefore Raiding(misty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Lorianne is afflictive. Lorianne is xxxi. Lorianne is populous. Quiet, xxxi things are argent. If something is military then it is xlii. Blue things are undynamic. If something is xxxi and afflictive then it is argent. If something is argent then it is military. All argent things are populous. If something is military and afflictive then it is xxxi. Nice, xlii things are populous. Lorianne is not argent.", "logic": "\nAfflictive(lorianne)\nXxxi(lorianne)\nPopulous(lorianne)\nforall x (Populous(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Argent(x))\nforall x (Military(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) -> Undynamic(x))\nforall x (Xxxi(x) and Afflictive(x) -> Argent(x))\nforall x (Argent(x) -> Military(x))\nforall x (Argent(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Military(x) and Afflictive(x) -> Xxxi(x))\nforall x (Xxxi(x) and Xlii(x) -> Populous(x))\n\nnot Argent(lorianne)\n\nXxxi(lorianne) and Afflictive(lorianne) and forall x (Xxxi(x) and Afflictive(x) -> Argent(x)) -> therefore Argent(lorianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Vite is braggy. Vite is submissive. Vite is serflike. Quiet, submissive things are waste. If something is sexed then it is randomised. Blue things are buoyant. If something is submissive and braggy then it is waste. If something is waste then it is sexed. All waste things are serflike. If something is sexed and braggy then it is submissive. Nice, randomised things are serflike. Vite is sexed.", "logic": "\nBraggy(vite)\nSubmissive(vite)\nSerflike(vite)\nforall x (Serflike(x) and Submissive(x) -> Waste(x))\nforall x (Sexed(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Buoyant(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Braggy(x) -> Waste(x))\nforall x (Waste(x) -> Sexed(x))\nforall x (Waste(x) -> Serflike(x))\nforall x (Sexed(x) and Braggy(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Randomised(x) -> Serflike(x))\n\nSexed(vite)\n\nSubmissive(vite) and Braggy(vite) and forall x (Submissive(x) and Braggy(x) -> Waste(x)) -> therefore Waste(vite) Waste(vite) and forall x (Waste(x) -> Sexed(x)) -> therefore Sexed(vite)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Caresse is twinning. Caresse is deltoid. Caresse is didactic. Quiet, deltoid things are catalectic. If something is great then it is flexile. Blue things are eclectic. If something is deltoid and twinning then it is catalectic. If something is catalectic then it is great. All catalectic things are didactic. If something is great and twinning then it is deltoid. Nice, flexile things are didactic. Caresse is not great.", "logic": "\nTwinning(caresse)\nDeltoid(caresse)\nDidactic(caresse)\nforall x (Didactic(x) and Deltoid(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Great(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Twinning(x) -> Eclectic(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) and Twinning(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Catalectic(x) -> Great(x))\nforall x (Catalectic(x) -> Didactic(x))\nforall x (Great(x) and Twinning(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) and Flexile(x) -> Didactic(x))\n\nnot Great(caresse)\n\nDeltoid(caresse) and Twinning(caresse) and forall x (Deltoid(x) and Twinning(x) -> Catalectic(x)) -> therefore Catalectic(caresse) Catalectic(caresse) and forall x (Catalectic(x) -> Great(x)) -> therefore Great(caresse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Terina is refreshed. Terina is solicitous. Terina is vigesimal. Quiet, solicitous things are silken. If something is anaglyptic then it is unsubdued. Blue things are scheduled. If something is solicitous and refreshed then it is silken. If something is silken then it is anaglyptic. All silken things are vigesimal. If something is anaglyptic and refreshed then it is solicitous. Nice, unsubdued things are vigesimal. Terina is unsubdued.", "logic": "\nRefreshed(terina)\nSolicitous(terina)\nVigesimal(terina)\nforall x (Vigesimal(x) and Solicitous(x) -> Silken(x))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Unsubdued(x))\nforall x (Refreshed(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Solicitous(x) and Refreshed(x) -> Silken(x))\nforall x (Silken(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nforall x (Silken(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) and Refreshed(x) -> Solicitous(x))\nforall x (Solicitous(x) and Unsubdued(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\n\nUnsubdued(terina)\n\nSolicitous(terina) and Refreshed(terina) and forall x (Solicitous(x) and Refreshed(x) -> Silken(x)) -> therefore Silken(terina) Silken(terina) and forall x (Silken(x) -> Anaglyptic(x)) -> therefore Anaglyptic(terina) Anaglyptic(terina) and forall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Unsubdued(x)) -> therefore Unsubdued(terina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Filbert is tubular. Filbert is brownish. Filbert is fulgurous. Quiet, brownish things are squawky. If something is handelian then it is lukewarm. Blue things are wifely. If something is brownish and tubular then it is squawky. If something is squawky then it is handelian. All squawky things are fulgurous. If something is handelian and tubular then it is brownish. Nice, lukewarm things are fulgurous. Filbert is not lukewarm.", "logic": "\nTubular(filbert)\nBrownish(filbert)\nFulgurous(filbert)\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) and Brownish(x) -> Squawky(x))\nforall x (Handelian(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\nforall x (Tubular(x) -> Wifely(x))\nforall x (Brownish(x) and Tubular(x) -> Squawky(x))\nforall x (Squawky(x) -> Handelian(x))\nforall x (Squawky(x) -> Fulgurous(x))\nforall x (Handelian(x) and Tubular(x) -> Brownish(x))\nforall x (Brownish(x) and Lukewarm(x) -> Fulgurous(x))\n\nnot Lukewarm(filbert)\n\nBrownish(filbert) and Tubular(filbert) and forall x (Brownish(x) and Tubular(x) -> Squawky(x)) -> therefore Squawky(filbert) Squawky(filbert) and forall x (Squawky(x) -> Handelian(x)) -> therefore Handelian(filbert) Handelian(filbert) and forall x (Handelian(x) -> Lukewarm(x)) -> therefore Lukewarm(filbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Alberto is airborne. Alberto is apish. Alberto is watery. Alberto is contingent. Maggie is airborne. Maggie is shaven. Maggie is contingent. Rough people are watery. All corrosive, shaven people are socialized. Round, corrosive people are contingent. All watery people are apish. Round, apish people are shaven. If Alberto is watery and Alberto is apish then Alberto is contingent. If Maggie is apish then Maggie is airborne. All airborne people are corrosive. Maggie is shaven.", "logic": "\nAirborne(alberto)\nApish(alberto)\nWatery(alberto)\nContingent(alberto)\nAirborne(maggie)\nShaven(maggie)\nContingent(maggie)\nforall x (Socialized(x) -> Watery(x))\nforall x (Corrosive(x) and Shaven(x) -> Socialized(x))\nforall x (Watery(x) and Corrosive(x) -> Contingent(x))\nforall x (Watery(x) -> Apish(x))\nforall x (Watery(x) and Apish(x) -> Shaven(x))\nWatery(alberto) and Apish(alberto) -> Contingent(alberto)\nApish(maggie) -> Airborne(maggie)\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> Corrosive(x))\n\nShaven(maggie)\n\ntherefore Shaven(maggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Quinlan is nocturnal. Quinlan is unsealed. Quinlan is bromic. Quinlan is seagoing. Jordy is nocturnal. Jordy is thai. Jordy is seagoing. Rough people are bromic. All homeward, thai people are unplaced. Round, homeward people are seagoing. All bromic people are unsealed. Round, unsealed people are thai. If Quinlan is bromic and Quinlan is unsealed then Quinlan is seagoing. If Jordy is unsealed then Jordy is nocturnal. All nocturnal people are homeward. Jordy is not nocturnal.", "logic": "\nNocturnal(quinlan)\nUnsealed(quinlan)\nBromic(quinlan)\nSeagoing(quinlan)\nNocturnal(jordy)\nThai(jordy)\nSeagoing(jordy)\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Bromic(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) and Thai(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Bromic(x) and Homeward(x) -> Seagoing(x))\nforall x (Bromic(x) -> Unsealed(x))\nforall x (Bromic(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Thai(x))\nBromic(quinlan) and Unsealed(quinlan) -> Seagoing(quinlan)\nUnsealed(jordy) -> Nocturnal(jordy)\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) -> Homeward(x))\n\nnot Nocturnal(jordy)\n\ntherefore Nocturnal(jordy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Staford is skewed. Staford is myalgic. Staford is scabrous. Staford is monandrous. Jolynn is skewed. Jolynn is hebraical. Jolynn is monandrous. Rough people are scabrous. All unclear, hebraical people are appetising. Round, unclear people are monandrous. All scabrous people are myalgic. Round, myalgic people are hebraical. If Staford is scabrous and Staford is myalgic then Staford is monandrous. If Jolynn is myalgic then Jolynn is skewed. All skewed people are unclear. Staford is unclear.", "logic": "\nSkewed(staford)\nMyalgic(staford)\nScabrous(staford)\nMonandrous(staford)\nSkewed(jolynn)\nHebraical(jolynn)\nMonandrous(jolynn)\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Unclear(x) and Hebraical(x) -> Appetising(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Unclear(x) -> Monandrous(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) -> Myalgic(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Myalgic(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nScabrous(staford) and Myalgic(staford) -> Monandrous(staford)\nMyalgic(jolynn) -> Skewed(jolynn)\nforall x (Skewed(x) -> Unclear(x))\n\nUnclear(staford)\n\nSkewed(staford) and forall x (Skewed(x) -> Unclear(x)) -> therefore Unclear(staford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Hewet is posthumous. Hewet is withering. Hewet is cissy. Hewet is august. Mabelle is posthumous. Mabelle is throated. Mabelle is august. Rough people are cissy. All romanian, throated people are vesicatory. Round, romanian people are august. All cissy people are withering. Round, withering people are throated. If Hewet is cissy and Hewet is withering then Hewet is august. If Mabelle is withering then Mabelle is posthumous. All posthumous people are romanian. Hewet is not romanian.", "logic": "\nPosthumous(hewet)\nWithering(hewet)\nCissy(hewet)\nAugust(hewet)\nPosthumous(mabelle)\nThroated(mabelle)\nAugust(mabelle)\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) -> Cissy(x))\nforall x (Romanian(x) and Throated(x) -> Vesicatory(x))\nforall x (Cissy(x) and Romanian(x) -> August(x))\nforall x (Cissy(x) -> Withering(x))\nforall x (Cissy(x) and Withering(x) -> Throated(x))\nCissy(hewet) and Withering(hewet) -> August(hewet)\nWithering(mabelle) -> Posthumous(mabelle)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Romanian(x))\n\nnot Romanian(hewet)\n\nPosthumous(hewet) and forall x (Posthumous(x) -> Romanian(x)) -> therefore Romanian(hewet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Cristi is twin. Cristi is underhand. Cristi is sunlit. Cristi is greater. Alic is twin. Alic is xcvii. Alic is greater. Rough people are sunlit. All prostate, xcvii people are poltroon. Round, prostate people are greater. All sunlit people are underhand. Round, underhand people are xcvii. If Cristi is sunlit and Cristi is underhand then Cristi is greater. If Alic is underhand then Alic is twin. All twin people are prostate. Cristi is poltroon.", "logic": "\nTwin(cristi)\nUnderhand(cristi)\nSunlit(cristi)\nGreater(cristi)\nTwin(alic)\nXcvii(alic)\nGreater(alic)\nforall x (Poltroon(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) and Xcvii(x) -> Poltroon(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) and Prostate(x) -> Greater(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) and Underhand(x) -> Xcvii(x))\nSunlit(cristi) and Underhand(cristi) -> Greater(cristi)\nUnderhand(alic) -> Twin(alic)\nforall x (Twin(x) -> Prostate(x))\n\nPoltroon(cristi)\n\nTwin(cristi) and forall x (Twin(x) -> Prostate(x)) -> therefore Prostate(cristi) Sunlit(cristi) and Underhand(cristi) and forall x (Sunlit(x) and Underhand(x) -> Xcvii(x)) -> therefore Xcvii(cristi) Prostate(cristi) and Xcvii(cristi) and forall x (Prostate(x) and Xcvii(x) -> Poltroon(x)) -> therefore Poltroon(cristi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Vonni is tailless. Vonni is middling. Vonni is araneidal. Vonni is rippled. Knox is tailless. Knox is upstream. Knox is rippled. Rough people are araneidal. All aboriginal, upstream people are bent. Round, aboriginal people are rippled. All araneidal people are middling. Round, middling people are upstream. If Vonni is araneidal and Vonni is middling then Vonni is rippled. If Knox is middling then Knox is tailless. All tailless people are aboriginal. Vonni is not bent.", "logic": "\nTailless(vonni)\nMiddling(vonni)\nAraneidal(vonni)\nRippled(vonni)\nTailless(knox)\nUpstream(knox)\nRippled(knox)\nforall x (Bent(x) -> Araneidal(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) and Upstream(x) -> Bent(x))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) and Aboriginal(x) -> Rippled(x))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) -> Middling(x))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) and Middling(x) -> Upstream(x))\nAraneidal(vonni) and Middling(vonni) -> Rippled(vonni)\nMiddling(knox) -> Tailless(knox)\nforall x (Tailless(x) -> Aboriginal(x))\n\nnot Bent(vonni)\n\nTailless(vonni) and forall x (Tailless(x) -> Aboriginal(x)) -> therefore Aboriginal(vonni) Araneidal(vonni) and Middling(vonni) and forall x (Araneidal(x) and Middling(x) -> Upstream(x)) -> therefore Upstream(vonni) Aboriginal(vonni) and Upstream(vonni) and forall x (Aboriginal(x) and Upstream(x) -> Bent(x)) -> therefore Bent(vonni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Trever is cxxv. Trever is sulphurous. Trever is autotypic. Trever is clubbable. Dorie is cxxv. Dorie is hazy. Dorie is clubbable. Rough people are autotypic. All algonquian, hazy people are tongan. Round, algonquian people are clubbable. All autotypic people are sulphurous. Round, sulphurous people are hazy. If Trever is autotypic and Trever is sulphurous then Trever is clubbable. If Dorie is sulphurous then Dorie is cxxv. All cxxv people are algonquian. Dorie is autotypic.", "logic": "\nCxxv(trever)\nSulphurous(trever)\nAutotypic(trever)\nClubbable(trever)\nCxxv(dorie)\nHazy(dorie)\nClubbable(dorie)\nforall x (Tongan(x) -> Autotypic(x))\nforall x (Algonquian(x) and Hazy(x) -> Tongan(x))\nforall x (Autotypic(x) and Algonquian(x) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Autotypic(x) -> Sulphurous(x))\nforall x (Autotypic(x) and Sulphurous(x) -> Hazy(x))\nAutotypic(trever) and Sulphurous(trever) -> Clubbable(trever)\nSulphurous(dorie) -> Cxxv(dorie)\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Algonquian(x))\n\nAutotypic(dorie)\n\nCxxv(dorie) and forall x (Cxxv(x) -> Algonquian(x)) -> therefore Algonquian(dorie) Algonquian(dorie) and Hazy(dorie) and forall x (Algonquian(x) and Hazy(x) -> Tongan(x)) -> therefore Tongan(dorie) Tongan(dorie) and forall x (Tongan(x) -> Autotypic(x)) -> therefore Autotypic(dorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Alexa is runproof. Alexa is miniature. Alexa is tagged. Alexa is forced. Windy is runproof. Windy is pinnated. Windy is forced. Rough people are tagged. All toughened, pinnated people are eternal. Round, toughened people are forced. All tagged people are miniature. Round, miniature people are pinnated. If Alexa is tagged and Alexa is miniature then Alexa is forced. If Windy is miniature then Windy is runproof. All runproof people are toughened. Windy is not tagged.", "logic": "\nRunproof(alexa)\nMiniature(alexa)\nTagged(alexa)\nForced(alexa)\nRunproof(windy)\nPinnated(windy)\nForced(windy)\nforall x (Eternal(x) -> Tagged(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and Pinnated(x) -> Eternal(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) and Toughened(x) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Miniature(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) and Miniature(x) -> Pinnated(x))\nTagged(alexa) and Miniature(alexa) -> Forced(alexa)\nMiniature(windy) -> Runproof(windy)\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Toughened(x))\n\nnot Tagged(windy)\n\nRunproof(windy) and forall x (Runproof(x) -> Toughened(x)) -> therefore Toughened(windy) Toughened(windy) and Pinnated(windy) and forall x (Toughened(x) and Pinnated(x) -> Eternal(x)) -> therefore Eternal(windy) Eternal(windy) and forall x (Eternal(x) -> Tagged(x)) -> therefore Tagged(windy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "The ezechiel rehearse the bogart. The ezechiel is proverbial. The ezechiel trail the giffer. The ezechiel trail the bogart. The ezechiel roughen the bogart. The giffer is gaga. The giffer is coeval. The giffer is proverbial. The giffer is scrub. The giffer roughen the ezechiel. The bogart rehearse the ezechiel. The bogart rehearse the giffer. The bogart is conceited. The bogart is proverbial. The bogart trail the giffer. The bogart roughen the ezechiel. If something roughen the giffer and it rehearse the giffer then it roughen the bogart. If the bogart roughen the ezechiel and the ezechiel trail the giffer then the bogart roughen the giffer. If something roughen the bogart then it is coeval. The ezechiel roughen the bogart.", "logic": "\nRehearse(ezechiel, bogart)\nProverbial(ezechiel)\nTrail(ezechiel, giffer)\nTrail(ezechiel, bogart)\nRoughen(ezechiel, bogart)\nGaga(giffer)\nCoeval(giffer)\nProverbial(giffer)\nScrub(giffer)\nRoughen(giffer, ezechiel)\nRehearse(bogart, ezechiel)\nRehearse(bogart, giffer)\nConceited(bogart)\nProverbial(bogart)\nTrail(bogart, giffer)\nRoughen(bogart, ezechiel)\nforall x (Roughen(x, giffer) and Rehearse(x, giffer) -> Roughen(x, bogart))\nRoughen(bogart, ezechiel) and Trail(ezechiel, giffer) -> Roughen(bogart, giffer)\nforall x (Roughen(x, bogart) -> Coeval(x))\n\nRoughen(ezechiel, bogart)\n\ntherefore Roughen(ezechiel, bogart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The salvidor quibble the ruthi. The salvidor is consuming. The salvidor grill the consolata. The salvidor grill the ruthi. The salvidor annunciate the ruthi. The consolata is calycine. The consolata is barren. The consolata is consuming. The consolata is accusative. The consolata annunciate the salvidor. The ruthi quibble the salvidor. The ruthi quibble the consolata. The ruthi is unsnarled. The ruthi is consuming. The ruthi grill the consolata. The ruthi annunciate the salvidor. If something annunciate the consolata and it quibble the consolata then it annunciate the ruthi. If the ruthi annunciate the salvidor and the salvidor grill the consolata then the ruthi annunciate the consolata. If something annunciate the ruthi then it is barren. The ruthi does not like the consolata.", "logic": "\nQuibble(salvidor, ruthi)\nConsuming(salvidor)\nGrill(salvidor, consolata)\nGrill(salvidor, ruthi)\nAnnunciate(salvidor, ruthi)\nCalycine(consolata)\nBarren(consolata)\nConsuming(consolata)\nAccusative(consolata)\nAnnunciate(consolata, salvidor)\nQuibble(ruthi, salvidor)\nQuibble(ruthi, consolata)\nUnsnarled(ruthi)\nConsuming(ruthi)\nGrill(ruthi, consolata)\nAnnunciate(ruthi, salvidor)\nforall x (Annunciate(x, consolata) and Quibble(x, consolata) -> Annunciate(x, ruthi))\nAnnunciate(ruthi, salvidor) and Grill(salvidor, consolata) -> Annunciate(ruthi, consolata)\nforall x (Annunciate(x, ruthi) -> Barren(x))\n\nnot Grill(ruthi, consolata)\n\ntherefore Grill(ruthi, consolata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The betsy dimension the valentin. The betsy is important. The betsy swag the noah. The betsy swag the valentin. The betsy lunch the valentin. The noah is acid. The noah is conversant. The noah is important. The noah is live. The noah lunch the betsy. The valentin dimension the betsy. The valentin dimension the noah. The valentin is soled. The valentin is important. The valentin swag the noah. The valentin lunch the betsy. If something lunch the noah and it dimension the noah then it lunch the valentin. If the valentin lunch the betsy and the betsy swag the noah then the valentin lunch the noah. If something lunch the valentin then it is conversant. The betsy is conversant.", "logic": "\nDimension(betsy, valentin)\nImportant(betsy)\nSwag(betsy, noah)\nSwag(betsy, valentin)\nLunch(betsy, valentin)\nAcid(noah)\nConversant(noah)\nImportant(noah)\nLive(noah)\nLunch(noah, betsy)\nDimension(valentin, betsy)\nDimension(valentin, noah)\nSoled(valentin)\nImportant(valentin)\nSwag(valentin, noah)\nLunch(valentin, betsy)\nforall x (Lunch(x, noah) and Dimension(x, noah) -> Lunch(x, valentin))\nLunch(valentin, betsy) and Swag(betsy, noah) -> Lunch(valentin, noah)\nforall x (Lunch(x, valentin) -> Conversant(x))\n\nConversant(betsy)\n\nLunch(betsy, valentin) and forall x (Lunch(x, valentin) -> Conversant(x)) -> therefore Conversant(betsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The francisca refract the ole. The francisca is steaming. The francisca wrawl the robyn. The francisca wrawl the ole. The francisca stigmatize the ole. The robyn is deathlike. The robyn is antigenic. The robyn is steaming. The robyn is provencal. The robyn stigmatize the francisca. The ole refract the francisca. The ole refract the robyn. The ole is slopped. The ole is steaming. The ole wrawl the robyn. The ole stigmatize the francisca. If something stigmatize the robyn and it refract the robyn then it stigmatize the ole. If the ole stigmatize the francisca and the francisca wrawl the robyn then the ole stigmatize the robyn. If something stigmatize the ole then it is antigenic. The ole does not visit the robyn.", "logic": "\nRefract(francisca, ole)\nSteaming(francisca)\nWrawl(francisca, robyn)\nWrawl(francisca, ole)\nStigmatize(francisca, ole)\nDeathlike(robyn)\nAntigenic(robyn)\nSteaming(robyn)\nProvencal(robyn)\nStigmatize(robyn, francisca)\nRefract(ole, francisca)\nRefract(ole, robyn)\nSlopped(ole)\nSteaming(ole)\nWrawl(ole, robyn)\nStigmatize(ole, francisca)\nforall x (Stigmatize(x, robyn) and Refract(x, robyn) -> Stigmatize(x, ole))\nStigmatize(ole, francisca) and Wrawl(francisca, robyn) -> Stigmatize(ole, robyn)\nforall x (Stigmatize(x, ole) -> Antigenic(x))\n\nnot Stigmatize(ole, robyn)\n\nStigmatize(ole, francisca) and Wrawl(francisca, robyn) and Stigmatize(ole, francisca) and Wrawl(francisca, robyn) -> Stigmatize(ole, robyn) -> therefore Stigmatize(ole, robyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The dick undo the peyton. The dick is excitable. The dick posit the riley. The dick posit the peyton. The dick pervade the peyton. The riley is hardened. The riley is symmetric. The riley is excitable. The riley is adsorbate. The riley pervade the dick. The peyton undo the dick. The peyton undo the riley. The peyton is seated. The peyton is excitable. The peyton posit the riley. The peyton pervade the dick. If something pervade the riley and it undo the riley then it pervade the peyton. If the peyton pervade the dick and the dick posit the riley then the peyton pervade the riley. If something pervade the peyton then it is symmetric. The peyton pervade the peyton.", "logic": "\nUndo(dick, peyton)\nExcitable(dick)\nPosit(dick, riley)\nPosit(dick, peyton)\nPervade(dick, peyton)\nHardened(riley)\nSymmetric(riley)\nExcitable(riley)\nAdsorbate(riley)\nPervade(riley, dick)\nUndo(peyton, dick)\nUndo(peyton, riley)\nSeated(peyton)\nExcitable(peyton)\nPosit(peyton, riley)\nPervade(peyton, dick)\nforall x (Pervade(x, riley) and Undo(x, riley) -> Pervade(x, peyton))\nPervade(peyton, dick) and Posit(dick, riley) -> Pervade(peyton, riley)\nforall x (Pervade(x, peyton) -> Symmetric(x))\n\nPervade(peyton, peyton)\n\nPervade(peyton, dick) and Posit(dick, riley) and Pervade(peyton, dick) and Posit(dick, riley) -> Pervade(peyton, riley) -> therefore Pervade(peyton, riley) Pervade(peyton, riley) and Undo(peyton, riley) and forall x (Pervade(x, riley) and Undo(x, riley) -> Pervade(x, peyton)) -> therefore Pervade(peyton, peyton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The linus enlarge the rodrick. The linus is miraculous. The linus sulfurette the rebeka. The linus sulfurette the rodrick. The linus stridulate the rodrick. The rebeka is untethered. The rebeka is falling. The rebeka is miraculous. The rebeka is tottery. The rebeka stridulate the linus. The rodrick enlarge the linus. The rodrick enlarge the rebeka. The rodrick is judicious. The rodrick is miraculous. The rodrick sulfurette the rebeka. The rodrick stridulate the linus. If something stridulate the rebeka and it enlarge the rebeka then it stridulate the rodrick. If the rodrick stridulate the linus and the linus sulfurette the rebeka then the rodrick stridulate the rebeka. If something stridulate the rodrick then it is falling. The rodrick does not visit the rodrick.", "logic": "\nEnlarge(linus, rodrick)\nMiraculous(linus)\nSulfurette(linus, rebeka)\nSulfurette(linus, rodrick)\nStridulate(linus, rodrick)\nUntethered(rebeka)\nFalling(rebeka)\nMiraculous(rebeka)\nTottery(rebeka)\nStridulate(rebeka, linus)\nEnlarge(rodrick, linus)\nEnlarge(rodrick, rebeka)\nJudicious(rodrick)\nMiraculous(rodrick)\nSulfurette(rodrick, rebeka)\nStridulate(rodrick, linus)\nforall x (Stridulate(x, rebeka) and Enlarge(x, rebeka) -> Stridulate(x, rodrick))\nStridulate(rodrick, linus) and Sulfurette(linus, rebeka) -> Stridulate(rodrick, rebeka)\nforall x (Stridulate(x, rodrick) -> Falling(x))\n\nnot Stridulate(rodrick, rodrick)\n\nStridulate(rodrick, linus) and Sulfurette(linus, rebeka) and Stridulate(rodrick, linus) and Sulfurette(linus, rebeka) -> Stridulate(rodrick, rebeka) -> therefore Stridulate(rodrick, rebeka) Stridulate(rodrick, rebeka) and Enlarge(rodrick, rebeka) and forall x (Stridulate(x, rebeka) and Enlarge(x, rebeka) -> Stridulate(x, rodrick)) -> therefore Stridulate(rodrick, rodrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The derby stampede the milzie. The derby is repulsive. The derby offset the kaster. The derby offset the milzie. The derby grin the milzie. The kaster is unblinking. The kaster is unopposed. The kaster is repulsive. The kaster is lipophilic. The kaster grin the derby. The milzie stampede the derby. The milzie stampede the kaster. The milzie is dubious. The milzie is repulsive. The milzie offset the kaster. The milzie grin the derby. If something grin the kaster and it stampede the kaster then it grin the milzie. If the milzie grin the derby and the derby offset the kaster then the milzie grin the kaster. If something grin the milzie then it is unopposed. The milzie is unopposed.", "logic": "\nStampede(derby, milzie)\nRepulsive(derby)\nOffset(derby, kaster)\nOffset(derby, milzie)\nGrin(derby, milzie)\nUnblinking(kaster)\nUnopposed(kaster)\nRepulsive(kaster)\nLipophilic(kaster)\nGrin(kaster, derby)\nStampede(milzie, derby)\nStampede(milzie, kaster)\nDubious(milzie)\nRepulsive(milzie)\nOffset(milzie, kaster)\nGrin(milzie, derby)\nforall x (Grin(x, kaster) and Stampede(x, kaster) -> Grin(x, milzie))\nGrin(milzie, derby) and Offset(derby, kaster) -> Grin(milzie, kaster)\nforall x (Grin(x, milzie) -> Unopposed(x))\n\nUnopposed(milzie)\n\nGrin(milzie, derby) and Offset(derby, kaster) and Grin(milzie, derby) and Offset(derby, kaster) -> Grin(milzie, kaster) -> therefore Grin(milzie, kaster) Grin(milzie, kaster) and Stampede(milzie, kaster) and forall x (Grin(x, kaster) and Stampede(x, kaster) -> Grin(x, milzie)) -> therefore Grin(milzie, milzie) Grin(milzie, milzie) and forall x (Grin(x, milzie) -> Unopposed(x)) -> therefore Unopposed(milzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The caty chitter the clemmy. The caty is uncoloured. The caty alcoholise the dorothea. The caty alcoholise the clemmy. The caty advantage the clemmy. The dorothea is mottled. The dorothea is footloose. The dorothea is uncoloured. The dorothea is markovian. The dorothea advantage the caty. The clemmy chitter the caty. The clemmy chitter the dorothea. The clemmy is tearing. The clemmy is uncoloured. The clemmy alcoholise the dorothea. The clemmy advantage the caty. If something advantage the dorothea and it chitter the dorothea then it advantage the clemmy. If the clemmy advantage the caty and the caty alcoholise the dorothea then the clemmy advantage the dorothea. If something advantage the clemmy then it is footloose. The clemmy is not footloose.", "logic": "\nChitter(caty, clemmy)\nUncoloured(caty)\nAlcoholise(caty, dorothea)\nAlcoholise(caty, clemmy)\nAdvantage(caty, clemmy)\nMottled(dorothea)\nFootloose(dorothea)\nUncoloured(dorothea)\nMarkovian(dorothea)\nAdvantage(dorothea, caty)\nChitter(clemmy, caty)\nChitter(clemmy, dorothea)\nTearing(clemmy)\nUncoloured(clemmy)\nAlcoholise(clemmy, dorothea)\nAdvantage(clemmy, caty)\nforall x (Advantage(x, dorothea) and Chitter(x, dorothea) -> Advantage(x, clemmy))\nAdvantage(clemmy, caty) and Alcoholise(caty, dorothea) -> Advantage(clemmy, dorothea)\nforall x (Advantage(x, clemmy) -> Footloose(x))\n\nnot Footloose(clemmy)\n\nAdvantage(clemmy, caty) and Alcoholise(caty, dorothea) and Advantage(clemmy, caty) and Alcoholise(caty, dorothea) -> Advantage(clemmy, dorothea) -> therefore Advantage(clemmy, dorothea) Advantage(clemmy, dorothea) and Chitter(clemmy, dorothea) and forall x (Advantage(x, dorothea) and Chitter(x, dorothea) -> Advantage(x, clemmy)) -> therefore Advantage(clemmy, clemmy) Advantage(clemmy, clemmy) and forall x (Advantage(x, clemmy) -> Footloose(x)) -> therefore Footloose(clemmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The jaymee aberrate the lelah. The jaymee is depilatory. The jaymee whoosh the gaynor. The jaymee whoosh the lelah. The jaymee sermonize the lelah. The gaynor is shapely. The gaynor is winy. The gaynor is depilatory. The gaynor is matchless. The gaynor sermonize the jaymee. The lelah aberrate the jaymee. The lelah aberrate the gaynor. The lelah is blond. The lelah is depilatory. The lelah whoosh the gaynor. The lelah sermonize the jaymee. If something sermonize the gaynor and it aberrate the gaynor then it sermonize the lelah. If the lelah sermonize the jaymee and the jaymee whoosh the gaynor then the lelah sermonize the gaynor. If something sermonize the lelah then it is winy. The gaynor does not visit the lelah.", "logic": "\nAberrate(jaymee, lelah)\nDepilatory(jaymee)\nWhoosh(jaymee, gaynor)\nWhoosh(jaymee, lelah)\nSermonize(jaymee, lelah)\nShapely(gaynor)\nWiny(gaynor)\nDepilatory(gaynor)\nMatchless(gaynor)\nSermonize(gaynor, jaymee)\nAberrate(lelah, jaymee)\nAberrate(lelah, gaynor)\nBlond(lelah)\nDepilatory(lelah)\nWhoosh(lelah, gaynor)\nSermonize(lelah, jaymee)\nforall x (Sermonize(x, gaynor) and Aberrate(x, gaynor) -> Sermonize(x, lelah))\nSermonize(lelah, jaymee) and Whoosh(jaymee, gaynor) -> Sermonize(lelah, gaynor)\nforall x (Sermonize(x, lelah) -> Winy(x))\n\nnot Sermonize(gaynor, lelah)\n\nforall x (Sermonize(x, gaynor) and Aberrate(x, gaynor) -> Sermonize(x, lelah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The hattie roam the goober. The hattie is cranial. The hattie sour the baxter. The hattie sour the goober. The hattie believe the goober. The baxter is morganatic. The baxter is treasured. The baxter is cranial. The baxter is romish. The baxter believe the hattie. The goober roam the hattie. The goober roam the baxter. The goober is changed. The goober is cranial. The goober sour the baxter. The goober believe the hattie. If something believe the baxter and it roam the baxter then it believe the goober. If the goober believe the hattie and the hattie sour the baxter then the goober believe the baxter. If something believe the goober then it is treasured. The hattie roam the hattie.", "logic": "\nRoam(hattie, goober)\nCranial(hattie)\nSour(hattie, baxter)\nSour(hattie, goober)\nBelieve(hattie, goober)\nMorganatic(baxter)\nTreasured(baxter)\nCranial(baxter)\nRomish(baxter)\nBelieve(baxter, hattie)\nRoam(goober, hattie)\nRoam(goober, baxter)\nChanged(goober)\nCranial(goober)\nSour(goober, baxter)\nBelieve(goober, hattie)\nforall x (Believe(x, baxter) and Roam(x, baxter) -> Believe(x, goober))\nBelieve(goober, hattie) and Sour(hattie, baxter) -> Believe(goober, baxter)\nforall x (Believe(x, goober) -> Treasured(x))\n\nRoam(hattie, hattie)\n\nRoam(hattie, hattie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The philippa squawk the ivy. The philippa is jolty. The philippa spelunk the cameo. The philippa spelunk the ivy. The philippa slat the ivy. The cameo is supposable. The cameo is parvenu. The cameo is jolty. The cameo is glandular. The cameo slat the philippa. The ivy squawk the philippa. The ivy squawk the cameo. The ivy is squinched. The ivy is jolty. The ivy spelunk the cameo. The ivy slat the philippa. If something slat the cameo and it squawk the cameo then it slat the ivy. If the ivy slat the philippa and the philippa spelunk the cameo then the ivy slat the cameo. If something slat the ivy then it is parvenu. The philippa is not supposable.", "logic": "\nSquawk(philippa, ivy)\nJolty(philippa)\nSpelunk(philippa, cameo)\nSpelunk(philippa, ivy)\nSlat(philippa, ivy)\nSupposable(cameo)\nParvenu(cameo)\nJolty(cameo)\nGlandular(cameo)\nSlat(cameo, philippa)\nSquawk(ivy, philippa)\nSquawk(ivy, cameo)\nSquinched(ivy)\nJolty(ivy)\nSpelunk(ivy, cameo)\nSlat(ivy, philippa)\nforall x (Slat(x, cameo) and Squawk(x, cameo) -> Slat(x, ivy))\nSlat(ivy, philippa) and Spelunk(philippa, cameo) -> Slat(ivy, cameo)\nforall x (Slat(x, ivy) -> Parvenu(x))\n\nnot Supposable(philippa)\n\nnot Supposable(philippa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The shayla pester the lazar. The shayla is hypnogogic. The shayla major the malka. The shayla major the lazar. The shayla flavor the lazar. The malka is idolized. The malka is catabolic. The malka is hypnogogic. The malka is grimy. The malka flavor the shayla. The lazar pester the shayla. The lazar pester the malka. The lazar is prostyle. The lazar is hypnogogic. The lazar major the malka. The lazar flavor the shayla. If something flavor the malka and it pester the malka then it flavor the lazar. If the lazar flavor the shayla and the shayla major the malka then the lazar flavor the malka. If something flavor the lazar then it is catabolic. The malka flavor the malka.", "logic": "\nPester(shayla, lazar)\nHypnogogic(shayla)\nMajor(shayla, malka)\nMajor(shayla, lazar)\nFlavor(shayla, lazar)\nIdolized(malka)\nCatabolic(malka)\nHypnogogic(malka)\nGrimy(malka)\nFlavor(malka, shayla)\nPester(lazar, shayla)\nPester(lazar, malka)\nProstyle(lazar)\nHypnogogic(lazar)\nMajor(lazar, malka)\nFlavor(lazar, shayla)\nforall x (Flavor(x, malka) and Pester(x, malka) -> Flavor(x, lazar))\nFlavor(lazar, shayla) and Major(shayla, malka) -> Flavor(lazar, malka)\nforall x (Flavor(x, lazar) -> Catabolic(x))\n\nFlavor(malka, malka)\n\nFlavor(malka, malka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The yancy militarise the genna. The yancy is kooky. The yancy toboggan the stacy. The yancy toboggan the genna. The yancy oppress the genna. The stacy is zimbabwean. The stacy is unadorned. The stacy is kooky. The stacy is agitating. The stacy oppress the yancy. The genna militarise the yancy. The genna militarise the stacy. The genna is beltlike. The genna is kooky. The genna toboggan the stacy. The genna oppress the yancy. If something oppress the stacy and it militarise the stacy then it oppress the genna. If the genna oppress the yancy and the yancy toboggan the stacy then the genna oppress the stacy. If something oppress the genna then it is unadorned. The stacy does not eat the stacy.", "logic": "\nMilitarise(yancy, genna)\nKooky(yancy)\nToboggan(yancy, stacy)\nToboggan(yancy, genna)\nOppress(yancy, genna)\nZimbabwean(stacy)\nUnadorned(stacy)\nKooky(stacy)\nAgitating(stacy)\nOppress(stacy, yancy)\nMilitarise(genna, yancy)\nMilitarise(genna, stacy)\nBeltlike(genna)\nKooky(genna)\nToboggan(genna, stacy)\nOppress(genna, yancy)\nforall x (Oppress(x, stacy) and Militarise(x, stacy) -> Oppress(x, genna))\nOppress(genna, yancy) and Toboggan(yancy, stacy) -> Oppress(genna, stacy)\nforall x (Oppress(x, genna) -> Unadorned(x))\n\nnot Militarise(stacy, stacy)\n\nnot Militarise(stacy, stacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The dusty partner the elena. The dusty is molten. The dusty militarise the dosi. The dusty militarise the elena. The dusty sidetrack the elena. The dosi is boggy. The dosi is propitious. The dosi is molten. The dosi is factious. The dosi sidetrack the dusty. The elena partner the dusty. The elena partner the dosi. The elena is yummy. The elena is molten. The elena militarise the dosi. The elena sidetrack the dusty. If something sidetrack the dosi and it partner the dosi then it sidetrack the elena. If the elena sidetrack the dusty and the dusty militarise the dosi then the elena sidetrack the dosi. If something sidetrack the elena then it is propitious. The elena is factious.", "logic": "\nPartner(dusty, elena)\nMolten(dusty)\nMilitarise(dusty, dosi)\nMilitarise(dusty, elena)\nSidetrack(dusty, elena)\nBoggy(dosi)\nPropitious(dosi)\nMolten(dosi)\nFactious(dosi)\nSidetrack(dosi, dusty)\nPartner(elena, dusty)\nPartner(elena, dosi)\nYummy(elena)\nMolten(elena)\nMilitarise(elena, dosi)\nSidetrack(elena, dusty)\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, dosi) and Partner(x, dosi) -> Sidetrack(x, elena))\nSidetrack(elena, dusty) and Militarise(dusty, dosi) -> Sidetrack(elena, dosi)\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, elena) -> Propitious(x))\n\nFactious(elena)\n\nFactious(elena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The tatiana outgeneral the liorah. The tatiana is brocaded. The tatiana church the lynn. The tatiana church the liorah. The tatiana stake the liorah. The lynn is flip. The lynn is parentless. The lynn is brocaded. The lynn is hundredth. The lynn stake the tatiana. The liorah outgeneral the tatiana. The liorah outgeneral the lynn. The liorah is serologic. The liorah is brocaded. The liorah church the lynn. The liorah stake the tatiana. If something stake the lynn and it outgeneral the lynn then it stake the liorah. If the liorah stake the tatiana and the tatiana church the lynn then the liorah stake the lynn. If something stake the liorah then it is parentless. The lynn does not like the lynn.", "logic": "\nOutgeneral(tatiana, liorah)\nBrocaded(tatiana)\nChurch(tatiana, lynn)\nChurch(tatiana, liorah)\nStake(tatiana, liorah)\nFlip(lynn)\nParentless(lynn)\nBrocaded(lynn)\nHundredth(lynn)\nStake(lynn, tatiana)\nOutgeneral(liorah, tatiana)\nOutgeneral(liorah, lynn)\nSerologic(liorah)\nBrocaded(liorah)\nChurch(liorah, lynn)\nStake(liorah, tatiana)\nforall x (Stake(x, lynn) and Outgeneral(x, lynn) -> Stake(x, liorah))\nStake(liorah, tatiana) and Church(tatiana, lynn) -> Stake(liorah, lynn)\nforall x (Stake(x, liorah) -> Parentless(x))\n\nnot Church(lynn, lynn)\n\nnot Church(lynn, lynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The babette bedizen the elinore. The babette is spaced. The babette adjure the hari. The babette adjure the elinore. The babette infuse the elinore. The hari is unsubdued. The hari is pliable. The hari is spaced. The hari is terrible. The hari infuse the babette. The elinore bedizen the babette. The elinore bedizen the hari. The elinore is pragmatic. The elinore is spaced. The elinore adjure the hari. The elinore infuse the babette. If something infuse the hari and it bedizen the hari then it infuse the elinore. If the elinore infuse the babette and the babette adjure the hari then the elinore infuse the hari. If something infuse the elinore then it is pliable. The babette adjure the babette.", "logic": "\nBedizen(babette, elinore)\nSpaced(babette)\nAdjure(babette, hari)\nAdjure(babette, elinore)\nInfuse(babette, elinore)\nUnsubdued(hari)\nPliable(hari)\nSpaced(hari)\nTerrible(hari)\nInfuse(hari, babette)\nBedizen(elinore, babette)\nBedizen(elinore, hari)\nPragmatic(elinore)\nSpaced(elinore)\nAdjure(elinore, hari)\nInfuse(elinore, babette)\nforall x (Infuse(x, hari) and Bedizen(x, hari) -> Infuse(x, elinore))\nInfuse(elinore, babette) and Adjure(babette, hari) -> Infuse(elinore, hari)\nforall x (Infuse(x, elinore) -> Pliable(x))\n\nAdjure(babette, babette)\n\nAdjure(babette, babette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The thekla rubric the tomi. The thekla rubric the jilli. The thekla is concurrent. The thekla bloody the tomi. The modesta vitaminize the tomi. The modesta vitaminize the jilli. The modesta rubric the tomi. The modesta rubric the jilli. The modesta is concurrent. The modesta is aftermost. The modesta bloody the thekla. The tomi is concurrent. The tomi bloody the jilli. The jilli rubric the tomi. The jilli is undraped. If something rubric the modesta and the modesta is subsidized then it rubric the thekla. If the thekla bloody the jilli and the thekla rubric the modesta then the thekla vitaminize the jilli. If something rubric the thekla and it does not chase the tomi then the thekla vitaminize the jilli. If something bloody the jilli then the jilli rubric the thekla. If the tomi vitaminize the thekla then the tomi is not concurrent. If something vitaminize the jilli and the jilli rubric the thekla then the jilli bloody the modesta. If the jilli rubric the thekla and the jilli bloody the modesta then the modesta is undraped. If the jilli is subsidized and the thekla does not chase the jilli then the jilli does not need the thekla. The jilli rubric the tomi.", "logic": "\nRubric(thekla, tomi)\nRubric(thekla, jilli)\nConcurrent(thekla)\nBloody(thekla, tomi)\nVitaminize(modesta, tomi)\nVitaminize(modesta, jilli)\nRubric(modesta, tomi)\nRubric(modesta, jilli)\nConcurrent(modesta)\nAftermost(modesta)\nBloody(modesta, thekla)\nConcurrent(tomi)\nBloody(tomi, jilli)\nRubric(jilli, tomi)\nUndraped(jilli)\nforall x (Rubric(x, modesta) and Subsidized(modesta) -> Rubric(x, thekla))\nBloody(thekla, jilli) and Rubric(thekla, modesta) -> Vitaminize(thekla, jilli)\nforall x (Rubric(x, thekla) and not Vitaminize(x, tomi) -> Vitaminize(thekla, jilli))\nforall x (Bloody(x, jilli) -> Rubric(jilli, thekla))\nVitaminize(tomi, thekla) -> not Concurrent(tomi)\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, jilli) and Rubric(jilli, thekla) -> Bloody(jilli, modesta))\nRubric(jilli, thekla) and Bloody(jilli, modesta) -> Undraped(modesta)\nSubsidized(jilli) and not Vitaminize(thekla, jilli) -> not Bloody(jilli, thekla)\n\nRubric(jilli, tomi)\n\ntherefore Rubric(jilli, tomi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The antin reprieve the livia. The antin reprieve the aubree. The antin is printable. The antin crystalise the livia. The jerrine clabber the livia. The jerrine clabber the aubree. The jerrine reprieve the livia. The jerrine reprieve the aubree. The jerrine is printable. The jerrine is sceptical. The jerrine crystalise the antin. The livia is printable. The livia crystalise the aubree. The aubree reprieve the livia. The aubree is snuggled. If something reprieve the jerrine and the jerrine is leonine then it reprieve the antin. If the antin crystalise the aubree and the antin reprieve the jerrine then the antin clabber the aubree. If something reprieve the antin and it does not chase the livia then the antin clabber the aubree. If something crystalise the aubree then the aubree reprieve the antin. If the livia clabber the antin then the livia is not printable. If something clabber the aubree and the aubree reprieve the antin then the aubree crystalise the jerrine. If the aubree reprieve the antin and the aubree crystalise the jerrine then the jerrine is snuggled. If the aubree is leonine and the antin does not chase the aubree then the aubree does not need the antin. The aubree is not snuggled.", "logic": "\nReprieve(antin, livia)\nReprieve(antin, aubree)\nPrintable(antin)\nCrystalise(antin, livia)\nClabber(jerrine, livia)\nClabber(jerrine, aubree)\nReprieve(jerrine, livia)\nReprieve(jerrine, aubree)\nPrintable(jerrine)\nSceptical(jerrine)\nCrystalise(jerrine, antin)\nPrintable(livia)\nCrystalise(livia, aubree)\nReprieve(aubree, livia)\nSnuggled(aubree)\nforall x (Reprieve(x, jerrine) and Leonine(jerrine) -> Reprieve(x, antin))\nCrystalise(antin, aubree) and Reprieve(antin, jerrine) -> Clabber(antin, aubree)\nforall x (Reprieve(x, antin) and not Clabber(x, livia) -> Clabber(antin, aubree))\nforall x (Crystalise(x, aubree) -> Reprieve(aubree, antin))\nClabber(livia, antin) -> not Printable(livia)\nforall x (Clabber(x, aubree) and Reprieve(aubree, antin) -> Crystalise(aubree, jerrine))\nReprieve(aubree, antin) and Crystalise(aubree, jerrine) -> Snuggled(jerrine)\nLeonine(aubree) and not Clabber(antin, aubree) -> not Crystalise(aubree, antin)\n\nnot Snuggled(aubree)\n\ntherefore Snuggled(aubree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The tobe unionize the barb. The tobe unionize the arvy. The tobe is impetuous. The tobe swerve the barb. The barth lime the barb. The barth lime the arvy. The barth unionize the barb. The barth unionize the arvy. The barth is impetuous. The barth is saxicoline. The barth swerve the tobe. The barb is impetuous. The barb swerve the arvy. The arvy unionize the barb. The arvy is seamed. If something unionize the barth and the barth is apodeictic then it unionize the tobe. If the tobe swerve the arvy and the tobe unionize the barth then the tobe lime the arvy. If something unionize the tobe and it does not chase the barb then the tobe lime the arvy. If something swerve the arvy then the arvy unionize the tobe. If the barb lime the tobe then the barb is not impetuous. If something lime the arvy and the arvy unionize the tobe then the arvy swerve the barth. If the arvy unionize the tobe and the arvy swerve the barth then the barth is seamed. If the arvy is apodeictic and the tobe does not chase the arvy then the arvy does not need the tobe. The arvy unionize the tobe.", "logic": "\nUnionize(tobe, barb)\nUnionize(tobe, arvy)\nImpetuous(tobe)\nSwerve(tobe, barb)\nLime(barth, barb)\nLime(barth, arvy)\nUnionize(barth, barb)\nUnionize(barth, arvy)\nImpetuous(barth)\nSaxicoline(barth)\nSwerve(barth, tobe)\nImpetuous(barb)\nSwerve(barb, arvy)\nUnionize(arvy, barb)\nSeamed(arvy)\nforall x (Unionize(x, barth) and Apodeictic(barth) -> Unionize(x, tobe))\nSwerve(tobe, arvy) and Unionize(tobe, barth) -> Lime(tobe, arvy)\nforall x (Unionize(x, tobe) and not Lime(x, barb) -> Lime(tobe, arvy))\nforall x (Swerve(x, arvy) -> Unionize(arvy, tobe))\nLime(barb, tobe) -> not Impetuous(barb)\nforall x (Lime(x, arvy) and Unionize(arvy, tobe) -> Swerve(arvy, barth))\nUnionize(arvy, tobe) and Swerve(arvy, barth) -> Seamed(barth)\nApodeictic(arvy) and not Lime(tobe, arvy) -> not Swerve(arvy, tobe)\n\nUnionize(arvy, tobe)\n\nSwerve(barb, arvy) and forall x (Swerve(x, arvy) -> Unionize(arvy, tobe)) -> therefore Unionize(arvy, tobe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The haven nucleate the elva. The haven nucleate the aprilette. The haven is concealed. The haven relativize the elva. The jessee applaud the elva. The jessee applaud the aprilette. The jessee nucleate the elva. The jessee nucleate the aprilette. The jessee is concealed. The jessee is swagger. The jessee relativize the haven. The elva is concealed. The elva relativize the aprilette. The aprilette nucleate the elva. The aprilette is prudent. If something nucleate the jessee and the jessee is grumose then it nucleate the haven. If the haven relativize the aprilette and the haven nucleate the jessee then the haven applaud the aprilette. If something nucleate the haven and it does not chase the elva then the haven applaud the aprilette. If something relativize the aprilette then the aprilette nucleate the haven. If the elva applaud the haven then the elva is not concealed. If something applaud the aprilette and the aprilette nucleate the haven then the aprilette relativize the jessee. If the aprilette nucleate the haven and the aprilette relativize the jessee then the jessee is prudent. If the aprilette is grumose and the haven does not chase the aprilette then the aprilette does not need the haven. The aprilette does not eat the haven.", "logic": "\nNucleate(haven, elva)\nNucleate(haven, aprilette)\nConcealed(haven)\nRelativize(haven, elva)\nApplaud(jessee, elva)\nApplaud(jessee, aprilette)\nNucleate(jessee, elva)\nNucleate(jessee, aprilette)\nConcealed(jessee)\nSwagger(jessee)\nRelativize(jessee, haven)\nConcealed(elva)\nRelativize(elva, aprilette)\nNucleate(aprilette, elva)\nPrudent(aprilette)\nforall x (Nucleate(x, jessee) and Grumose(jessee) -> Nucleate(x, haven))\nRelativize(haven, aprilette) and Nucleate(haven, jessee) -> Applaud(haven, aprilette)\nforall x (Nucleate(x, haven) and not Applaud(x, elva) -> Applaud(haven, aprilette))\nforall x (Relativize(x, aprilette) -> Nucleate(aprilette, haven))\nApplaud(elva, haven) -> not Concealed(elva)\nforall x (Applaud(x, aprilette) and Nucleate(aprilette, haven) -> Relativize(aprilette, jessee))\nNucleate(aprilette, haven) and Relativize(aprilette, jessee) -> Prudent(jessee)\nGrumose(aprilette) and not Applaud(haven, aprilette) -> not Relativize(aprilette, haven)\n\nnot Nucleate(aprilette, haven)\n\nRelativize(elva, aprilette) and forall x (Relativize(x, aprilette) -> Nucleate(aprilette, haven)) -> therefore Nucleate(aprilette, haven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The mahmud tighten the zorah. The mahmud tighten the abner. The mahmud is homophonic. The mahmud outsail the zorah. The sheppard reunite the zorah. The sheppard reunite the abner. The sheppard tighten the zorah. The sheppard tighten the abner. The sheppard is homophonic. The sheppard is poised. The sheppard outsail the mahmud. The zorah is homophonic. The zorah outsail the abner. The abner tighten the zorah. The abner is partizan. If something tighten the sheppard and the sheppard is swish then it tighten the mahmud. If the mahmud outsail the abner and the mahmud tighten the sheppard then the mahmud reunite the abner. If something tighten the mahmud and it does not chase the zorah then the mahmud reunite the abner. If something outsail the abner then the abner tighten the mahmud. If the zorah reunite the mahmud then the zorah is not homophonic. If something reunite the abner and the abner tighten the mahmud then the abner outsail the sheppard. If the abner tighten the mahmud and the abner outsail the sheppard then the sheppard is partizan. If the abner is swish and the mahmud does not chase the abner then the abner does not need the mahmud. The abner outsail the sheppard.", "logic": "\nTighten(mahmud, zorah)\nTighten(mahmud, abner)\nHomophonic(mahmud)\nOutsail(mahmud, zorah)\nReunite(sheppard, zorah)\nReunite(sheppard, abner)\nTighten(sheppard, zorah)\nTighten(sheppard, abner)\nHomophonic(sheppard)\nPoised(sheppard)\nOutsail(sheppard, mahmud)\nHomophonic(zorah)\nOutsail(zorah, abner)\nTighten(abner, zorah)\nPartizan(abner)\nforall x (Tighten(x, sheppard) and Swish(sheppard) -> Tighten(x, mahmud))\nOutsail(mahmud, abner) and Tighten(mahmud, sheppard) -> Reunite(mahmud, abner)\nforall x (Tighten(x, mahmud) and not Reunite(x, zorah) -> Reunite(mahmud, abner))\nforall x (Outsail(x, abner) -> Tighten(abner, mahmud))\nReunite(zorah, mahmud) -> not Homophonic(zorah)\nforall x (Reunite(x, abner) and Tighten(abner, mahmud) -> Outsail(abner, sheppard))\nTighten(abner, mahmud) and Outsail(abner, sheppard) -> Partizan(sheppard)\nSwish(abner) and not Reunite(mahmud, abner) -> not Outsail(abner, mahmud)\n\nOutsail(abner, sheppard)\n\nOutsail(zorah, abner) and forall x (Outsail(x, abner) -> Tighten(abner, mahmud)) -> therefore Tighten(abner, mahmud) Reunite(sheppard, abner) and Tighten(abner, mahmud) and forall x (Reunite(x, abner) and Tighten(abner, mahmud) -> Outsail(abner, sheppard)) -> therefore Outsail(abner, sheppard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The kamila tweet the tildie. The kamila tweet the ali. The kamila is stockinged. The kamila loom the tildie. The yardley rebuff the tildie. The yardley rebuff the ali. The yardley tweet the tildie. The yardley tweet the ali. The yardley is stockinged. The yardley is delightful. The yardley loom the kamila. The tildie is stockinged. The tildie loom the ali. The ali tweet the tildie. The ali is rugged. If something tweet the yardley and the yardley is banausic then it tweet the kamila. If the kamila loom the ali and the kamila tweet the yardley then the kamila rebuff the ali. If something tweet the kamila and it does not chase the tildie then the kamila rebuff the ali. If something loom the ali then the ali tweet the kamila. If the tildie rebuff the kamila then the tildie is not stockinged. If something rebuff the ali and the ali tweet the kamila then the ali loom the yardley. If the ali tweet the kamila and the ali loom the yardley then the yardley is rugged. If the ali is banausic and the kamila does not chase the ali then the ali does not need the kamila. The ali does not need the yardley.", "logic": "\nTweet(kamila, tildie)\nTweet(kamila, ali)\nStockinged(kamila)\nLoom(kamila, tildie)\nRebuff(yardley, tildie)\nRebuff(yardley, ali)\nTweet(yardley, tildie)\nTweet(yardley, ali)\nStockinged(yardley)\nDelightful(yardley)\nLoom(yardley, kamila)\nStockinged(tildie)\nLoom(tildie, ali)\nTweet(ali, tildie)\nRugged(ali)\nforall x (Tweet(x, yardley) and Banausic(yardley) -> Tweet(x, kamila))\nLoom(kamila, ali) and Tweet(kamila, yardley) -> Rebuff(kamila, ali)\nforall x (Tweet(x, kamila) and not Rebuff(x, tildie) -> Rebuff(kamila, ali))\nforall x (Loom(x, ali) -> Tweet(ali, kamila))\nRebuff(tildie, kamila) -> not Stockinged(tildie)\nforall x (Rebuff(x, ali) and Tweet(ali, kamila) -> Loom(ali, yardley))\nTweet(ali, kamila) and Loom(ali, yardley) -> Rugged(yardley)\nBanausic(ali) and not Rebuff(kamila, ali) -> not Loom(ali, kamila)\n\nnot Loom(ali, yardley)\n\nLoom(tildie, ali) and forall x (Loom(x, ali) -> Tweet(ali, kamila)) -> therefore Tweet(ali, kamila) Rebuff(yardley, ali) and Tweet(ali, kamila) and forall x (Rebuff(x, ali) and Tweet(ali, kamila) -> Loom(ali, yardley)) -> therefore Loom(ali, yardley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The welsh crate the jerrome. The welsh crate the avivah. The welsh is baggy. The welsh howl the jerrome. The ofelia pacify the jerrome. The ofelia pacify the avivah. The ofelia crate the jerrome. The ofelia crate the avivah. The ofelia is baggy. The ofelia is cursed. The ofelia howl the welsh. The jerrome is baggy. The jerrome howl the avivah. The avivah crate the jerrome. The avivah is proof. If something crate the ofelia and the ofelia is inelegant then it crate the welsh. If the welsh howl the avivah and the welsh crate the ofelia then the welsh pacify the avivah. If something crate the welsh and it does not chase the jerrome then the welsh pacify the avivah. If something howl the avivah then the avivah crate the welsh. If the jerrome pacify the welsh then the jerrome is not baggy. If something pacify the avivah and the avivah crate the welsh then the avivah howl the ofelia. If the avivah crate the welsh and the avivah howl the ofelia then the ofelia is proof. If the avivah is inelegant and the welsh does not chase the avivah then the avivah does not need the welsh. The ofelia is proof.", "logic": "\nCrate(welsh, jerrome)\nCrate(welsh, avivah)\nBaggy(welsh)\nHowl(welsh, jerrome)\nPacify(ofelia, jerrome)\nPacify(ofelia, avivah)\nCrate(ofelia, jerrome)\nCrate(ofelia, avivah)\nBaggy(ofelia)\nCursed(ofelia)\nHowl(ofelia, welsh)\nBaggy(jerrome)\nHowl(jerrome, avivah)\nCrate(avivah, jerrome)\nProof(avivah)\nforall x (Crate(x, ofelia) and Inelegant(ofelia) -> Crate(x, welsh))\nHowl(welsh, avivah) and Crate(welsh, ofelia) -> Pacify(welsh, avivah)\nforall x (Crate(x, welsh) and not Pacify(x, jerrome) -> Pacify(welsh, avivah))\nforall x (Howl(x, avivah) -> Crate(avivah, welsh))\nPacify(jerrome, welsh) -> not Baggy(jerrome)\nforall x (Pacify(x, avivah) and Crate(avivah, welsh) -> Howl(avivah, ofelia))\nCrate(avivah, welsh) and Howl(avivah, ofelia) -> Proof(ofelia)\nInelegant(avivah) and not Pacify(welsh, avivah) -> not Howl(avivah, welsh)\n\nProof(ofelia)\n\nHowl(jerrome, avivah) and forall x (Howl(x, avivah) -> Crate(avivah, welsh)) -> therefore Crate(avivah, welsh) Howl(jerrome, avivah) and forall x (Howl(x, avivah) -> Crate(avivah, welsh)) -> therefore Crate(avivah, welsh) Pacify(ofelia, avivah) and Crate(avivah, welsh) and forall x (Pacify(x, avivah) and Crate(avivah, welsh) -> Howl(avivah, ofelia)) -> therefore Howl(avivah, ofelia) Crate(avivah, welsh) and Howl(avivah, ofelia) and Crate(avivah, welsh) and Howl(avivah, ofelia) -> Proof(ofelia) -> therefore Proof(ofelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The ximenes iodinate the edi. The ximenes iodinate the korie. The ximenes is interim. The ximenes exenterate the edi. The miriam bomb the edi. The miriam bomb the korie. The miriam iodinate the edi. The miriam iodinate the korie. The miriam is interim. The miriam is disabled. The miriam exenterate the ximenes. The edi is interim. The edi exenterate the korie. The korie iodinate the edi. The korie is viscous. If something iodinate the miriam and the miriam is pimply then it iodinate the ximenes. If the ximenes exenterate the korie and the ximenes iodinate the miriam then the ximenes bomb the korie. If something iodinate the ximenes and it does not chase the edi then the ximenes bomb the korie. If something exenterate the korie then the korie iodinate the ximenes. If the edi bomb the ximenes then the edi is not interim. If something bomb the korie and the korie iodinate the ximenes then the korie exenterate the miriam. If the korie iodinate the ximenes and the korie exenterate the miriam then the miriam is viscous. If the korie is pimply and the ximenes does not chase the korie then the korie does not need the ximenes. The miriam is not viscous.", "logic": "\nIodinate(ximenes, edi)\nIodinate(ximenes, korie)\nInterim(ximenes)\nExenterate(ximenes, edi)\nBomb(miriam, edi)\nBomb(miriam, korie)\nIodinate(miriam, edi)\nIodinate(miriam, korie)\nInterim(miriam)\nDisabled(miriam)\nExenterate(miriam, ximenes)\nInterim(edi)\nExenterate(edi, korie)\nIodinate(korie, edi)\nViscous(korie)\nforall x (Iodinate(x, miriam) and Pimply(miriam) -> Iodinate(x, ximenes))\nExenterate(ximenes, korie) and Iodinate(ximenes, miriam) -> Bomb(ximenes, korie)\nforall x (Iodinate(x, ximenes) and not Bomb(x, edi) -> Bomb(ximenes, korie))\nforall x (Exenterate(x, korie) -> Iodinate(korie, ximenes))\nBomb(edi, ximenes) -> not Interim(edi)\nforall x (Bomb(x, korie) and Iodinate(korie, ximenes) -> Exenterate(korie, miriam))\nIodinate(korie, ximenes) and Exenterate(korie, miriam) -> Viscous(miriam)\nPimply(korie) and not Bomb(ximenes, korie) -> not Exenterate(korie, ximenes)\n\nnot Viscous(miriam)\n\nExenterate(edi, korie) and forall x (Exenterate(x, korie) -> Iodinate(korie, ximenes)) -> therefore Iodinate(korie, ximenes) Exenterate(edi, korie) and forall x (Exenterate(x, korie) -> Iodinate(korie, ximenes)) -> therefore Iodinate(korie, ximenes) Bomb(miriam, korie) and Iodinate(korie, ximenes) and forall x (Bomb(x, korie) and Iodinate(korie, ximenes) -> Exenterate(korie, miriam)) -> therefore Exenterate(korie, miriam) Iodinate(korie, ximenes) and Exenterate(korie, miriam) and Iodinate(korie, ximenes) and Exenterate(korie, miriam) -> Viscous(miriam) -> therefore Viscous(miriam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The gertrud demarcate the tessy. The gertrud demarcate the travers. The gertrud is minimal. The gertrud foolproof the tessy. The joyan rustle the tessy. The joyan rustle the travers. The joyan demarcate the tessy. The joyan demarcate the travers. The joyan is minimal. The joyan is musky. The joyan foolproof the gertrud. The tessy is minimal. The tessy foolproof the travers. The travers demarcate the tessy. The travers is ardent. If something demarcate the joyan and the joyan is incurved then it demarcate the gertrud. If the gertrud foolproof the travers and the gertrud demarcate the joyan then the gertrud rustle the travers. If something demarcate the gertrud and it does not chase the tessy then the gertrud rustle the travers. If something foolproof the travers then the travers demarcate the gertrud. If the tessy rustle the gertrud then the tessy is not minimal. If something rustle the travers and the travers demarcate the gertrud then the travers foolproof the joyan. If the travers demarcate the gertrud and the travers foolproof the joyan then the joyan is ardent. If the travers is incurved and the gertrud does not chase the travers then the travers does not need the gertrud. The tessy does not eat the gertrud.", "logic": "\nDemarcate(gertrud, tessy)\nDemarcate(gertrud, travers)\nMinimal(gertrud)\nFoolproof(gertrud, tessy)\nRustle(joyan, tessy)\nRustle(joyan, travers)\nDemarcate(joyan, tessy)\nDemarcate(joyan, travers)\nMinimal(joyan)\nMusky(joyan)\nFoolproof(joyan, gertrud)\nMinimal(tessy)\nFoolproof(tessy, travers)\nDemarcate(travers, tessy)\nArdent(travers)\nforall x (Demarcate(x, joyan) and Incurved(joyan) -> Demarcate(x, gertrud))\nFoolproof(gertrud, travers) and Demarcate(gertrud, joyan) -> Rustle(gertrud, travers)\nforall x (Demarcate(x, gertrud) and not Rustle(x, tessy) -> Rustle(gertrud, travers))\nforall x (Foolproof(x, travers) -> Demarcate(travers, gertrud))\nRustle(tessy, gertrud) -> not Minimal(tessy)\nforall x (Rustle(x, travers) and Demarcate(travers, gertrud) -> Foolproof(travers, joyan))\nDemarcate(travers, gertrud) and Foolproof(travers, joyan) -> Ardent(joyan)\nIncurved(travers) and not Rustle(gertrud, travers) -> not Foolproof(travers, gertrud)\n\nnot Demarcate(tessy, gertrud)\n\nforall x (Demarcate(x, joyan) and Incurved(joyan) -> Demarcate(x, gertrud)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The lonna readapt the murphy. The lonna readapt the luciana. The lonna is gregorian. The lonna droop the murphy. The kelsey position the murphy. The kelsey position the luciana. The kelsey readapt the murphy. The kelsey readapt the luciana. The kelsey is gregorian. The kelsey is gusseted. The kelsey droop the lonna. The murphy is gregorian. The murphy droop the luciana. The luciana readapt the murphy. The luciana is assured. If something readapt the kelsey and the kelsey is anuran then it readapt the lonna. If the lonna droop the luciana and the lonna readapt the kelsey then the lonna position the luciana. If something readapt the lonna and it does not chase the murphy then the lonna position the luciana. If something droop the luciana then the luciana readapt the lonna. If the murphy position the lonna then the murphy is not gregorian. If something position the luciana and the luciana readapt the lonna then the luciana droop the kelsey. If the luciana readapt the lonna and the luciana droop the kelsey then the kelsey is assured. If the luciana is anuran and the lonna does not chase the luciana then the luciana does not need the lonna. The lonna readapt the lonna.", "logic": "\nReadapt(lonna, murphy)\nReadapt(lonna, luciana)\nGregorian(lonna)\nDroop(lonna, murphy)\nPosition(kelsey, murphy)\nPosition(kelsey, luciana)\nReadapt(kelsey, murphy)\nReadapt(kelsey, luciana)\nGregorian(kelsey)\nGusseted(kelsey)\nDroop(kelsey, lonna)\nGregorian(murphy)\nDroop(murphy, luciana)\nReadapt(luciana, murphy)\nAssured(luciana)\nforall x (Readapt(x, kelsey) and Anuran(kelsey) -> Readapt(x, lonna))\nDroop(lonna, luciana) and Readapt(lonna, kelsey) -> Position(lonna, luciana)\nforall x (Readapt(x, lonna) and not Position(x, murphy) -> Position(lonna, luciana))\nforall x (Droop(x, luciana) -> Readapt(luciana, lonna))\nPosition(murphy, lonna) -> not Gregorian(murphy)\nforall x (Position(x, luciana) and Readapt(luciana, lonna) -> Droop(luciana, kelsey))\nReadapt(luciana, lonna) and Droop(luciana, kelsey) -> Assured(kelsey)\nAnuran(luciana) and not Position(lonna, luciana) -> not Droop(luciana, lonna)\n\nReadapt(lonna, lonna)\n\nforall x (Readapt(x, kelsey) and Anuran(kelsey) -> Readapt(x, lonna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The wang thumbtack the edouard. The wang thumbtack the paton. The wang is amorous. The wang coagulate the edouard. The carlita expose the edouard. The carlita expose the paton. The carlita thumbtack the edouard. The carlita thumbtack the paton. The carlita is amorous. The carlita is addled. The carlita coagulate the wang. The edouard is amorous. The edouard coagulate the paton. The paton thumbtack the edouard. The paton is severe. If something thumbtack the carlita and the carlita is upfront then it thumbtack the wang. If the wang coagulate the paton and the wang thumbtack the carlita then the wang expose the paton. If something thumbtack the wang and it does not chase the edouard then the wang expose the paton. If something coagulate the paton then the paton thumbtack the wang. If the edouard expose the wang then the edouard is not amorous. If something expose the paton and the paton thumbtack the wang then the paton coagulate the carlita. If the paton thumbtack the wang and the paton coagulate the carlita then the carlita is severe. If the paton is upfront and the wang does not chase the paton then the paton does not need the wang. The carlita does not eat the wang.", "logic": "\nThumbtack(wang, edouard)\nThumbtack(wang, paton)\nAmorous(wang)\nCoagulate(wang, edouard)\nExpose(carlita, edouard)\nExpose(carlita, paton)\nThumbtack(carlita, edouard)\nThumbtack(carlita, paton)\nAmorous(carlita)\nAddled(carlita)\nCoagulate(carlita, wang)\nAmorous(edouard)\nCoagulate(edouard, paton)\nThumbtack(paton, edouard)\nSevere(paton)\nforall x (Thumbtack(x, carlita) and Upfront(carlita) -> Thumbtack(x, wang))\nCoagulate(wang, paton) and Thumbtack(wang, carlita) -> Expose(wang, paton)\nforall x (Thumbtack(x, wang) and not Expose(x, edouard) -> Expose(wang, paton))\nforall x (Coagulate(x, paton) -> Thumbtack(paton, wang))\nExpose(edouard, wang) -> not Amorous(edouard)\nforall x (Expose(x, paton) and Thumbtack(paton, wang) -> Coagulate(paton, carlita))\nThumbtack(paton, wang) and Coagulate(paton, carlita) -> Severe(carlita)\nUpfront(paton) and not Expose(wang, paton) -> not Coagulate(paton, wang)\n\nnot Thumbtack(carlita, wang)\n\nforall x (Thumbtack(x, carlita) and Upfront(carlita) -> Thumbtack(x, wang)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The vanna train the elinore. The vanna train the tobi. The vanna is largish. The vanna gutter the elinore. The joellen encipher the elinore. The joellen encipher the tobi. The joellen train the elinore. The joellen train the tobi. The joellen is largish. The joellen is copesetic. The joellen gutter the vanna. The elinore is largish. The elinore gutter the tobi. The tobi train the elinore. The tobi is brocaded. If something train the joellen and the joellen is rotted then it train the vanna. If the vanna gutter the tobi and the vanna train the joellen then the vanna encipher the tobi. If something train the vanna and it does not chase the elinore then the vanna encipher the tobi. If something gutter the tobi then the tobi train the vanna. If the elinore encipher the vanna then the elinore is not largish. If something encipher the tobi and the tobi train the vanna then the tobi gutter the joellen. If the tobi train the vanna and the tobi gutter the joellen then the joellen is brocaded. If the tobi is rotted and the vanna does not chase the tobi then the tobi does not need the vanna. The vanna encipher the tobi.", "logic": "\nTrain(vanna, elinore)\nTrain(vanna, tobi)\nLargish(vanna)\nGutter(vanna, elinore)\nEncipher(joellen, elinore)\nEncipher(joellen, tobi)\nTrain(joellen, elinore)\nTrain(joellen, tobi)\nLargish(joellen)\nCopesetic(joellen)\nGutter(joellen, vanna)\nLargish(elinore)\nGutter(elinore, tobi)\nTrain(tobi, elinore)\nBrocaded(tobi)\nforall x (Train(x, joellen) and Rotted(joellen) -> Train(x, vanna))\nGutter(vanna, tobi) and Train(vanna, joellen) -> Encipher(vanna, tobi)\nforall x (Train(x, vanna) and not Encipher(x, elinore) -> Encipher(vanna, tobi))\nforall x (Gutter(x, tobi) -> Train(tobi, vanna))\nEncipher(elinore, vanna) -> not Largish(elinore)\nforall x (Encipher(x, tobi) and Train(tobi, vanna) -> Gutter(tobi, joellen))\nTrain(tobi, vanna) and Gutter(tobi, joellen) -> Brocaded(joellen)\nRotted(tobi) and not Encipher(vanna, tobi) -> not Gutter(tobi, vanna)\n\nEncipher(vanna, tobi)\n\nGutter(vanna, tobi) and Train(vanna, joellen) -> Encipher(vanna, tobi) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The ethelin seduce the merci. The ethelin seduce the simeon. The ethelin is monochrome. The ethelin proportion the merci. The florencia powwow the merci. The florencia powwow the simeon. The florencia seduce the merci. The florencia seduce the simeon. The florencia is monochrome. The florencia is womanly. The florencia proportion the ethelin. The merci is monochrome. The merci proportion the simeon. The simeon seduce the merci. The simeon is betting. If something seduce the florencia and the florencia is saponified then it seduce the ethelin. If the ethelin proportion the simeon and the ethelin seduce the florencia then the ethelin powwow the simeon. If something seduce the ethelin and it does not chase the merci then the ethelin powwow the simeon. If something proportion the simeon then the simeon seduce the ethelin. If the merci powwow the ethelin then the merci is not monochrome. If something powwow the simeon and the simeon seduce the ethelin then the simeon proportion the florencia. If the simeon seduce the ethelin and the simeon proportion the florencia then the florencia is betting. If the simeon is saponified and the ethelin does not chase the simeon then the simeon does not need the ethelin. The ethelin is not nice.", "logic": "\nSeduce(ethelin, merci)\nSeduce(ethelin, simeon)\nMonochrome(ethelin)\nProportion(ethelin, merci)\nPowwow(florencia, merci)\nPowwow(florencia, simeon)\nSeduce(florencia, merci)\nSeduce(florencia, simeon)\nMonochrome(florencia)\nWomanly(florencia)\nProportion(florencia, ethelin)\nMonochrome(merci)\nProportion(merci, simeon)\nSeduce(simeon, merci)\nBetting(simeon)\nforall x (Seduce(x, florencia) and Saponified(florencia) -> Seduce(x, ethelin))\nProportion(ethelin, simeon) and Seduce(ethelin, florencia) -> Powwow(ethelin, simeon)\nforall x (Seduce(x, ethelin) and not Powwow(x, merci) -> Powwow(ethelin, simeon))\nforall x (Proportion(x, simeon) -> Seduce(simeon, ethelin))\nPowwow(merci, ethelin) -> not Monochrome(merci)\nforall x (Powwow(x, simeon) and Seduce(simeon, ethelin) -> Proportion(simeon, florencia))\nSeduce(simeon, ethelin) and Proportion(simeon, florencia) -> Betting(florencia)\nSaponified(simeon) and not Powwow(ethelin, simeon) -> not Proportion(simeon, ethelin)\n\nnot Nice(ethelin)\n\nnot Nice(ethelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The roxana foxtrot the lorinda. The roxana foxtrot the anatola. The roxana is intoned. The roxana downsize the lorinda. The douglass languish the lorinda. The douglass languish the anatola. The douglass foxtrot the lorinda. The douglass foxtrot the anatola. The douglass is intoned. The douglass is hidebound. The douglass downsize the roxana. The lorinda is intoned. The lorinda downsize the anatola. The anatola foxtrot the lorinda. The anatola is transeunt. If something foxtrot the douglass and the douglass is unoriginal then it foxtrot the roxana. If the roxana downsize the anatola and the roxana foxtrot the douglass then the roxana languish the anatola. If something foxtrot the roxana and it does not chase the lorinda then the roxana languish the anatola. If something downsize the anatola then the anatola foxtrot the roxana. If the lorinda languish the roxana then the lorinda is not intoned. If something languish the anatola and the anatola foxtrot the roxana then the anatola downsize the douglass. If the anatola foxtrot the roxana and the anatola downsize the douglass then the douglass is transeunt. If the anatola is unoriginal and the roxana does not chase the anatola then the anatola does not need the roxana. The roxana languish the roxana.", "logic": "\nFoxtrot(roxana, lorinda)\nFoxtrot(roxana, anatola)\nIntoned(roxana)\nDownsize(roxana, lorinda)\nLanguish(douglass, lorinda)\nLanguish(douglass, anatola)\nFoxtrot(douglass, lorinda)\nFoxtrot(douglass, anatola)\nIntoned(douglass)\nHidebound(douglass)\nDownsize(douglass, roxana)\nIntoned(lorinda)\nDownsize(lorinda, anatola)\nFoxtrot(anatola, lorinda)\nTranseunt(anatola)\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, douglass) and Unoriginal(douglass) -> Foxtrot(x, roxana))\nDownsize(roxana, anatola) and Foxtrot(roxana, douglass) -> Languish(roxana, anatola)\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, roxana) and not Languish(x, lorinda) -> Languish(roxana, anatola))\nforall x (Downsize(x, anatola) -> Foxtrot(anatola, roxana))\nLanguish(lorinda, roxana) -> not Intoned(lorinda)\nforall x (Languish(x, anatola) and Foxtrot(anatola, roxana) -> Downsize(anatola, douglass))\nFoxtrot(anatola, roxana) and Downsize(anatola, douglass) -> Transeunt(douglass)\nUnoriginal(anatola) and not Languish(roxana, anatola) -> not Downsize(anatola, roxana)\n\nLanguish(roxana, roxana)\n\nLanguish(roxana, roxana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The malinde terrify the ken. The malinde terrify the emmett. The malinde is polemical. The malinde hurdle the ken. The olag rebuke the ken. The olag rebuke the emmett. The olag terrify the ken. The olag terrify the emmett. The olag is polemical. The olag is anaemic. The olag hurdle the malinde. The ken is polemical. The ken hurdle the emmett. The emmett terrify the ken. The emmett is frozen. If something terrify the olag and the olag is intensive then it terrify the malinde. If the malinde hurdle the emmett and the malinde terrify the olag then the malinde rebuke the emmett. If something terrify the malinde and it does not chase the ken then the malinde rebuke the emmett. If something hurdle the emmett then the emmett terrify the malinde. If the ken rebuke the malinde then the ken is not polemical. If something rebuke the emmett and the emmett terrify the malinde then the emmett hurdle the olag. If the emmett terrify the malinde and the emmett hurdle the olag then the olag is frozen. If the emmett is intensive and the malinde does not chase the emmett then the emmett does not need the malinde. The emmett is not polemical.", "logic": "\nTerrify(malinde, ken)\nTerrify(malinde, emmett)\nPolemical(malinde)\nHurdle(malinde, ken)\nRebuke(olag, ken)\nRebuke(olag, emmett)\nTerrify(olag, ken)\nTerrify(olag, emmett)\nPolemical(olag)\nAnaemic(olag)\nHurdle(olag, malinde)\nPolemical(ken)\nHurdle(ken, emmett)\nTerrify(emmett, ken)\nFrozen(emmett)\nforall x (Terrify(x, olag) and Intensive(olag) -> Terrify(x, malinde))\nHurdle(malinde, emmett) and Terrify(malinde, olag) -> Rebuke(malinde, emmett)\nforall x (Terrify(x, malinde) and not Rebuke(x, ken) -> Rebuke(malinde, emmett))\nforall x (Hurdle(x, emmett) -> Terrify(emmett, malinde))\nRebuke(ken, malinde) -> not Polemical(ken)\nforall x (Rebuke(x, emmett) and Terrify(emmett, malinde) -> Hurdle(emmett, olag))\nTerrify(emmett, malinde) and Hurdle(emmett, olag) -> Frozen(olag)\nIntensive(emmett) and not Rebuke(malinde, emmett) -> not Hurdle(emmett, malinde)\n\nnot Polemical(emmett)\n\nnot Polemical(emmett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The bancroft misgive the loise. The bancroft misgive the blakelee. The bancroft is exegetical. The bancroft damascene the loise. The leilah wrap the loise. The leilah wrap the blakelee. The leilah misgive the loise. The leilah misgive the blakelee. The leilah is exegetical. The leilah is wrothful. The leilah damascene the bancroft. The loise is exegetical. The loise damascene the blakelee. The blakelee misgive the loise. The blakelee is centigrade. If something misgive the leilah and the leilah is negro then it misgive the bancroft. If the bancroft damascene the blakelee and the bancroft misgive the leilah then the bancroft wrap the blakelee. If something misgive the bancroft and it does not chase the loise then the bancroft wrap the blakelee. If something damascene the blakelee then the blakelee misgive the bancroft. If the loise wrap the bancroft then the loise is not exegetical. If something wrap the blakelee and the blakelee misgive the bancroft then the blakelee damascene the leilah. If the blakelee misgive the bancroft and the blakelee damascene the leilah then the leilah is centigrade. If the blakelee is negro and the bancroft does not chase the blakelee then the blakelee does not need the bancroft. The blakelee wrap the loise.", "logic": "\nMisgive(bancroft, loise)\nMisgive(bancroft, blakelee)\nExegetical(bancroft)\nDamascene(bancroft, loise)\nWrap(leilah, loise)\nWrap(leilah, blakelee)\nMisgive(leilah, loise)\nMisgive(leilah, blakelee)\nExegetical(leilah)\nWrothful(leilah)\nDamascene(leilah, bancroft)\nExegetical(loise)\nDamascene(loise, blakelee)\nMisgive(blakelee, loise)\nCentigrade(blakelee)\nforall x (Misgive(x, leilah) and Negro(leilah) -> Misgive(x, bancroft))\nDamascene(bancroft, blakelee) and Misgive(bancroft, leilah) -> Wrap(bancroft, blakelee)\nforall x (Misgive(x, bancroft) and not Wrap(x, loise) -> Wrap(bancroft, blakelee))\nforall x (Damascene(x, blakelee) -> Misgive(blakelee, bancroft))\nWrap(loise, bancroft) -> not Exegetical(loise)\nforall x (Wrap(x, blakelee) and Misgive(blakelee, bancroft) -> Damascene(blakelee, leilah))\nMisgive(blakelee, bancroft) and Damascene(blakelee, leilah) -> Centigrade(leilah)\nNegro(blakelee) and not Wrap(bancroft, blakelee) -> not Damascene(blakelee, bancroft)\n\nWrap(blakelee, loise)\n\nWrap(blakelee, loise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "Filia is doctrinal. Filia is macerative. Lorilee is not macerative. Lorilee is not bygone. Corby is zestful. Corby is disyllabic. Corby is not bygone. All masked things are zestful. If Lorilee is not bygone then Lorilee is masked. All zestful things are disyllabic. Corby is disyllabic.", "logic": "\nDoctrinal(filia)\nMacerative(filia)\nnot Macerative(lorilee)\nnot Bygone(lorilee)\nZestful(corby)\nDisyllabic(corby)\nnot Bygone(corby)\nforall x (Masked(x) -> Zestful(x))\nnot Bygone(lorilee) -> Masked(lorilee)\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Disyllabic(x))\n\nDisyllabic(corby)\n\ntherefore Disyllabic(corby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Damara is calculated. Damara is mystified. Nonna is not mystified. Nonna is not cashable. Alphonse is windless. Alphonse is humanlike. Alphonse is not cashable. All beforehand things are windless. If Nonna is not cashable then Nonna is beforehand. All windless things are humanlike. Alphonse is cashable.", "logic": "\nCalculated(damara)\nMystified(damara)\nnot Mystified(nonna)\nnot Cashable(nonna)\nWindless(alphonse)\nHumanlike(alphonse)\nnot Cashable(alphonse)\nforall x (Beforehand(x) -> Windless(x))\nnot Cashable(nonna) -> Beforehand(nonna)\nforall x (Windless(x) -> Humanlike(x))\n\nCashable(alphonse)\n\ntherefore not Cashable(alphonse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Quigly is breezy. Quigly is legal. Samuela is not legal. Samuela is not geothermal. Kia is aground. Kia is indexical. Kia is not geothermal. All savorless things are aground. If Samuela is not geothermal then Samuela is savorless. All aground things are indexical. Samuela is savorless.", "logic": "\nBreezy(quigly)\nLegal(quigly)\nnot Legal(samuela)\nnot Geothermal(samuela)\nAground(kia)\nIndexical(kia)\nnot Geothermal(kia)\nforall x (Savorless(x) -> Aground(x))\nnot Geothermal(samuela) -> Savorless(samuela)\nforall x (Aground(x) -> Indexical(x))\n\nSavorless(samuela)\n\nnot Geothermal(samuela) and not Geothermal(samuela) -> Savorless(samuela) -> therefore Savorless(samuela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Riannon is bailable. Riannon is incarnate. Waylon is not incarnate. Waylon is not ungeared. Osbert is cheating. Osbert is erstwhile. Osbert is not ungeared. All appeasing things are cheating. If Waylon is not ungeared then Waylon is appeasing. All cheating things are erstwhile. Waylon is not appeasing.", "logic": "\nBailable(riannon)\nIncarnate(riannon)\nnot Incarnate(waylon)\nnot Ungeared(waylon)\nCheating(osbert)\nErstwhile(osbert)\nnot Ungeared(osbert)\nforall x (Appeasing(x) -> Cheating(x))\nnot Ungeared(waylon) -> Appeasing(waylon)\nforall x (Cheating(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\n\nnot Appeasing(waylon)\n\nnot Ungeared(waylon) and not Ungeared(waylon) -> Appeasing(waylon) -> therefore Appeasing(waylon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Mae is pitted. Mae is mild. Cori is not mild. Cori is not nefarious. Olga is timeless. Olga is undershot. Olga is not nefarious. All extrovert things are timeless. If Cori is not nefarious then Cori is extrovert. All timeless things are undershot. Cori is timeless.", "logic": "\nPitted(mae)\nMild(mae)\nnot Mild(cori)\nnot Nefarious(cori)\nTimeless(olga)\nUndershot(olga)\nnot Nefarious(olga)\nforall x (Extrovert(x) -> Timeless(x))\nnot Nefarious(cori) -> Extrovert(cori)\nforall x (Timeless(x) -> Undershot(x))\n\nTimeless(cori)\n\nnot Nefarious(cori) and not Nefarious(cori) -> Extrovert(cori) -> therefore Extrovert(cori) Extrovert(cori) and forall x (Extrovert(x) -> Timeless(x)) -> therefore Timeless(cori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Berni is semisoft. Berni is unmixable. Felipa is not unmixable. Felipa is not cannular. Mildred is papillose. Mildred is perceptive. Mildred is not cannular. All familiar things are papillose. If Felipa is not cannular then Felipa is familiar. All papillose things are perceptive. Felipa is not papillose.", "logic": "\nSemisoft(berni)\nUnmixable(berni)\nnot Unmixable(felipa)\nnot Cannular(felipa)\nPapillose(mildred)\nPerceptive(mildred)\nnot Cannular(mildred)\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Papillose(x))\nnot Cannular(felipa) -> Familiar(felipa)\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Perceptive(x))\n\nnot Papillose(felipa)\n\nnot Cannular(felipa) and not Cannular(felipa) -> Familiar(felipa) -> therefore Familiar(felipa) Familiar(felipa) and forall x (Familiar(x) -> Papillose(x)) -> therefore Papillose(felipa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Esmaria is exciting. Esmaria is american. Jemmy is not american. Jemmy is not parametric. Rachelle is unscripted. Rachelle is aquiferous. Rachelle is not parametric. All nonexempt things are unscripted. If Jemmy is not parametric then Jemmy is nonexempt. All unscripted things are aquiferous. Jemmy is aquiferous.", "logic": "\nExciting(esmaria)\nAmerican(esmaria)\nnot American(jemmy)\nnot Parametric(jemmy)\nUnscripted(rachelle)\nAquiferous(rachelle)\nnot Parametric(rachelle)\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Unscripted(x))\nnot Parametric(jemmy) -> Nonexempt(jemmy)\nforall x (Unscripted(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\n\nAquiferous(jemmy)\n\nnot Parametric(jemmy) and not Parametric(jemmy) -> Nonexempt(jemmy) -> therefore Nonexempt(jemmy) Nonexempt(jemmy) and forall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Unscripted(x)) -> therefore Unscripted(jemmy) Unscripted(jemmy) and forall x (Unscripted(x) -> Aquiferous(x)) -> therefore Aquiferous(jemmy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Tiff is peregrine. Tiff is demonic. Istvan is not demonic. Istvan is not brutal. Torrin is noxious. Torrin is riming. Torrin is not brutal. All goalless things are noxious. If Istvan is not brutal then Istvan is goalless. All noxious things are riming. Istvan is not riming.", "logic": "\nPeregrine(tiff)\nDemonic(tiff)\nnot Demonic(istvan)\nnot Brutal(istvan)\nNoxious(torrin)\nRiming(torrin)\nnot Brutal(torrin)\nforall x (Goalless(x) -> Noxious(x))\nnot Brutal(istvan) -> Goalless(istvan)\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Riming(x))\n\nnot Riming(istvan)\n\nnot Brutal(istvan) and not Brutal(istvan) -> Goalless(istvan) -> therefore Goalless(istvan) Goalless(istvan) and forall x (Goalless(x) -> Noxious(x)) -> therefore Noxious(istvan) Noxious(istvan) and forall x (Noxious(x) -> Riming(x)) -> therefore Riming(istvan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Demetra is polygynous. Demetra is dear. Rad is not dear. Rad is not saharan. Edwin is reasonless. Edwin is millionth. Edwin is not saharan. All angulate things are reasonless. If Rad is not saharan then Rad is angulate. All reasonless things are millionth. Demetra is not reasonless.", "logic": "\nPolygynous(demetra)\nDear(demetra)\nnot Dear(rad)\nnot Saharan(rad)\nReasonless(edwin)\nMillionth(edwin)\nnot Saharan(edwin)\nforall x (Angulate(x) -> Reasonless(x))\nnot Saharan(rad) -> Angulate(rad)\nforall x (Reasonless(x) -> Millionth(x))\n\nnot Reasonless(demetra)\n\nforall x (Angulate(x) -> Reasonless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Skippie is partizan. Skippie is mongol. Tharen is not mongol. Tharen is not acquitted. Haskel is filarial. Haskel is airy. Haskel is not acquitted. All mannerly things are filarial. If Tharen is not acquitted then Tharen is mannerly. All filarial things are airy. Skippie is airy.", "logic": "\nPartizan(skippie)\nMongol(skippie)\nnot Mongol(tharen)\nnot Acquitted(tharen)\nFilarial(haskel)\nAiry(haskel)\nnot Acquitted(haskel)\nforall x (Mannerly(x) -> Filarial(x))\nnot Acquitted(tharen) -> Mannerly(tharen)\nforall x (Filarial(x) -> Airy(x))\n\nAiry(skippie)\n\nforall x (Filarial(x) -> Airy(x)) <- forall x (Mannerly(x) -> Filarial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Pepita is aphanitic. Pepita is bicolor. Morna is not bicolor. Morna is not optic. Brigid is snuffling. Brigid is egoistical. Brigid is not optic. All uncurving things are snuffling. If Morna is not optic then Morna is uncurving. All snuffling things are egoistical. Brigid is not bicolor.", "logic": "\nAphanitic(pepita)\nBicolor(pepita)\nnot Bicolor(morna)\nnot Optic(morna)\nSnuffling(brigid)\nEgoistical(brigid)\nnot Optic(brigid)\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Snuffling(x))\nnot Optic(morna) -> Uncurving(morna)\nforall x (Snuffling(x) -> Egoistical(x))\n\nnot Bicolor(brigid)\n\nnot Bicolor(brigid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Kaila is ataractic. Kaila is leibnizian. Lavinia is not leibnizian. Lavinia is not becalmed. Francois is yogistic. Francois is canescent. Francois is not becalmed. All cogged things are yogistic. If Lavinia is not becalmed then Lavinia is cogged. All yogistic things are canescent. Francois is ataractic.", "logic": "\nAtaractic(kaila)\nLeibnizian(kaila)\nnot Leibnizian(lavinia)\nnot Becalmed(lavinia)\nYogistic(francois)\nCanescent(francois)\nnot Becalmed(francois)\nforall x (Cogged(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nnot Becalmed(lavinia) -> Cogged(lavinia)\nforall x (Yogistic(x) -> Canescent(x))\n\nAtaractic(francois)\n\nAtaractic(francois) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Aggi is invasive. Aggi is standard. Korney is not standard. Korney is not meshuga. Kissie is hematic. Kissie is enate. Kissie is not meshuga. All derivable things are hematic. If Korney is not meshuga then Korney is derivable. All hematic things are enate. Kissie is not young.", "logic": "\nInvasive(aggi)\nStandard(aggi)\nnot Standard(korney)\nnot Meshuga(korney)\nHematic(kissie)\nEnate(kissie)\nnot Meshuga(kissie)\nforall x (Derivable(x) -> Hematic(x))\nnot Meshuga(korney) -> Derivable(korney)\nforall x (Hematic(x) -> Enate(x))\n\nnot Young(kissie)\n\nnot Young(kissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Flory is daisylike. Flory is bitty. Adrea is not bitty. Adrea is not trillionth. Shilpa is blamable. Shilpa is silty. Shilpa is not trillionth. All untellable things are blamable. If Adrea is not trillionth then Adrea is untellable. All blamable things are silty. Flory is untellable.", "logic": "\nDaisylike(flory)\nBitty(flory)\nnot Bitty(adrea)\nnot Trillionth(adrea)\nBlamable(shilpa)\nSilty(shilpa)\nnot Trillionth(shilpa)\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> Blamable(x))\nnot Trillionth(adrea) -> Untellable(adrea)\nforall x (Blamable(x) -> Silty(x))\n\nUntellable(flory)\n\nUntellable(flory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Blaine is endocrinal. Blaine is unbrushed. West is not unbrushed. West is not parve. Ethelin is dividable. Ethelin is punitory. Ethelin is not parve. All systematic things are dividable. If West is not parve then West is systematic. All dividable things are punitory. West is not young.", "logic": "\nEndocrinal(blaine)\nUnbrushed(blaine)\nnot Unbrushed(west)\nnot Parve(west)\nDividable(ethelin)\nPunitory(ethelin)\nnot Parve(ethelin)\nforall x (Systematic(x) -> Dividable(x))\nnot Parve(west) -> Systematic(west)\nforall x (Dividable(x) -> Punitory(x))\n\nnot Young(west)\n\nnot Young(west) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Sally is gabonese. Sally is japanese. Tab is not japanese. Tab is not dazed. Christi is unpunctual. Christi is braided. Christi is not dazed. All daft things are unpunctual. If Tab is not dazed then Tab is daft. All unpunctual things are braided. Sally is dazed.", "logic": "\nGabonese(sally)\nJapanese(sally)\nnot Japanese(tab)\nnot Dazed(tab)\nUnpunctual(christi)\nBraided(christi)\nnot Dazed(christi)\nforall x (Daft(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\nnot Dazed(tab) -> Daft(tab)\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Braided(x))\n\nDazed(sally)\n\nDazed(sally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Rudyard is utile. Rudyard is both. Rudyard is resurgent. If something is debauched then it is ohmic. All both, utile things are flexuous. Furry, ohmic things are debauched. If Rudyard is resurgent then Rudyard is austral. If something is both and flexuous then it is debauched. Red things are both. Rudyard is utile.", "logic": "\nUtile(rudyard)\nBoth(rudyard)\nResurgent(rudyard)\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Ohmic(x))\nforall x (Both(x) and Utile(x) -> Flexuous(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) and Ohmic(x) -> Debauched(x))\nResurgent(rudyard) -> Austral(rudyard)\nforall x (Both(x) and Flexuous(x) -> Debauched(x))\nforall x (Resurgent(x) -> Both(x))\n\nUtile(rudyard)\n\ntherefore Utile(rudyard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Vinita is obligated. Vinita is caecilian. Vinita is albinic. If something is jaded then it is undressed. All caecilian, obligated things are bruising. Furry, undressed things are jaded. If Vinita is albinic then Vinita is rwandan. If something is caecilian and bruising then it is jaded. Red things are caecilian. Vinita is not caecilian.", "logic": "\nObligated(vinita)\nCaecilian(vinita)\nAlbinic(vinita)\nforall x (Jaded(x) -> Undressed(x))\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and Obligated(x) -> Bruising(x))\nforall x (Rwandan(x) and Undressed(x) -> Jaded(x))\nAlbinic(vinita) -> Rwandan(vinita)\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and Bruising(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Albinic(x) -> Caecilian(x))\n\nnot Caecilian(vinita)\n\ntherefore Caecilian(vinita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Orrin is rousseauan. Orrin is choric. Orrin is dynamic. If something is arterial then it is unexacting. All choric, rousseauan things are concentric. Furry, unexacting things are arterial. If Orrin is dynamic then Orrin is stalkless. If something is choric and concentric then it is arterial. Red things are choric. Orrin is stalkless.", "logic": "\nRousseauan(orrin)\nChoric(orrin)\nDynamic(orrin)\nforall x (Arterial(x) -> Unexacting(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) and Rousseauan(x) -> Concentric(x))\nforall x (Stalkless(x) and Unexacting(x) -> Arterial(x))\nDynamic(orrin) -> Stalkless(orrin)\nforall x (Choric(x) and Concentric(x) -> Arterial(x))\nforall x (Dynamic(x) -> Choric(x))\n\nStalkless(orrin)\n\nDynamic(orrin) and Dynamic(orrin) -> Stalkless(orrin) -> therefore Stalkless(orrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Hallie is vendible. Hallie is sanative. Hallie is recoilless. If something is piggish then it is aquatic. All sanative, vendible things are resiny. Furry, aquatic things are piggish. If Hallie is recoilless then Hallie is austrian. If something is sanative and resiny then it is piggish. Red things are sanative. Hallie is not resiny.", "logic": "\nVendible(hallie)\nSanative(hallie)\nRecoilless(hallie)\nforall x (Piggish(x) -> Aquatic(x))\nforall x (Sanative(x) and Vendible(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Austrian(x) and Aquatic(x) -> Piggish(x))\nRecoilless(hallie) -> Austrian(hallie)\nforall x (Sanative(x) and Resiny(x) -> Piggish(x))\nforall x (Recoilless(x) -> Sanative(x))\n\nnot Resiny(hallie)\n\nSanative(hallie) and Vendible(hallie) and forall x (Sanative(x) and Vendible(x) -> Resiny(x)) -> therefore Resiny(hallie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Leeanne is shuddering. Leeanne is scabrous. Leeanne is dionysian. If something is stockinged then it is gritty. All scabrous, shuddering things are diploid. Furry, gritty things are stockinged. If Leeanne is dionysian then Leeanne is refined. If something is scabrous and diploid then it is stockinged. Red things are scabrous. Leeanne is stockinged.", "logic": "\nShuddering(leeanne)\nScabrous(leeanne)\nDionysian(leeanne)\nforall x (Stockinged(x) -> Gritty(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Shuddering(x) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) and Gritty(x) -> Stockinged(x))\nDionysian(leeanne) -> Refined(leeanne)\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Diploid(x) -> Stockinged(x))\nforall x (Dionysian(x) -> Scabrous(x))\n\nStockinged(leeanne)\n\nScabrous(leeanne) and Shuddering(leeanne) and forall x (Scabrous(x) and Shuddering(x) -> Diploid(x)) -> therefore Diploid(leeanne) Scabrous(leeanne) and Diploid(leeanne) and forall x (Scabrous(x) and Diploid(x) -> Stockinged(x)) -> therefore Stockinged(leeanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Minta is eonian. Minta is unedited. Minta is modernized. If something is affected then it is deathlike. All unedited, eonian things are sharp. Furry, deathlike things are affected. If Minta is modernized then Minta is kashmiri. If something is unedited and sharp then it is affected. Red things are unedited. Minta is not affected.", "logic": "\nEonian(minta)\nUnedited(minta)\nModernized(minta)\nforall x (Affected(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) and Eonian(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) and Deathlike(x) -> Affected(x))\nModernized(minta) -> Kashmiri(minta)\nforall x (Unedited(x) and Sharp(x) -> Affected(x))\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Unedited(x))\n\nnot Affected(minta)\n\nUnedited(minta) and Eonian(minta) and forall x (Unedited(x) and Eonian(x) -> Sharp(x)) -> therefore Sharp(minta) Unedited(minta) and Sharp(minta) and forall x (Unedited(x) and Sharp(x) -> Affected(x)) -> therefore Affected(minta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Glory is unseeyn. Glory is hermetic. Glory is wearable. If something is weary then it is undesigned. All hermetic, unseeyn things are prefatory. Furry, undesigned things are weary. If Glory is wearable then Glory is humanistic. If something is hermetic and prefatory then it is weary. Red things are hermetic. Glory is undesigned.", "logic": "\nUnseeyn(glory)\nHermetic(glory)\nWearable(glory)\nforall x (Weary(x) -> Undesigned(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) and Unseeyn(x) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Humanistic(x) and Undesigned(x) -> Weary(x))\nWearable(glory) -> Humanistic(glory)\nforall x (Hermetic(x) and Prefatory(x) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Wearable(x) -> Hermetic(x))\n\nUndesigned(glory)\n\nHermetic(glory) and Unseeyn(glory) and forall x (Hermetic(x) and Unseeyn(x) -> Prefatory(x)) -> therefore Prefatory(glory) Hermetic(glory) and Prefatory(glory) and forall x (Hermetic(x) and Prefatory(x) -> Weary(x)) -> therefore Weary(glory) Weary(glory) and forall x (Weary(x) -> Undesigned(x)) -> therefore Undesigned(glory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Doralyn is knitted. Doralyn is confining. Doralyn is unsolved. If something is liable then it is nazarene. All confining, knitted things are plumelike. Furry, nazarene things are liable. If Doralyn is unsolved then Doralyn is laic. If something is confining and plumelike then it is liable. Red things are confining. Doralyn is not nazarene.", "logic": "\nKnitted(doralyn)\nConfining(doralyn)\nUnsolved(doralyn)\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Nazarene(x))\nforall x (Confining(x) and Knitted(x) -> Plumelike(x))\nforall x (Laic(x) and Nazarene(x) -> Liable(x))\nUnsolved(doralyn) -> Laic(doralyn)\nforall x (Confining(x) and Plumelike(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Unsolved(x) -> Confining(x))\n\nnot Nazarene(doralyn)\n\nConfining(doralyn) and Knitted(doralyn) and forall x (Confining(x) and Knitted(x) -> Plumelike(x)) -> therefore Plumelike(doralyn) Confining(doralyn) and Plumelike(doralyn) and forall x (Confining(x) and Plumelike(x) -> Liable(x)) -> therefore Liable(doralyn) Liable(doralyn) and forall x (Liable(x) -> Nazarene(x)) -> therefore Nazarene(doralyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "The hannah does not chase the chris. The hannah does not eat the ash. The hannah stenograph the chris. The hannah is not sorrowful. The hannah is attentive. The hannah does not need the ash. The hannah slosh the chris. The ash throne the hannah. The ash stenograph the hannah. The ash stenograph the chris. The ash slosh the hannah. The ash does not need the chris. The chris stenograph the hannah. The chris is dominating. The chris is overgreedy. The chris slosh the ash. If something slosh the ash then it does not chase the hannah. If the ash is attentive and the ash does not eat the hannah then the hannah is not attentive. If something stenograph the ash and the ash is not attentive then it slosh the hannah. If something throne the ash then it slosh the hannah. If something is sorrowful and not attentive then it throne the ash. If something is dominating and it does not chase the hannah then it throne the ash. The ash stenograph the hannah.", "logic": "\nnot Throne(hannah, chris)\nnot Stenograph(hannah, ash)\nStenograph(hannah, chris)\nnot Sorrowful(hannah)\nAttentive(hannah)\nnot Slosh(hannah, ash)\nSlosh(hannah, chris)\nThrone(ash, hannah)\nStenograph(ash, hannah)\nStenograph(ash, chris)\nSlosh(ash, hannah)\nnot Slosh(ash, chris)\nStenograph(chris, hannah)\nDominating(chris)\nOvergreedy(chris)\nSlosh(chris, ash)\nforall x (Slosh(x, ash) -> not Throne(x, hannah))\nAttentive(ash) and not Stenograph(ash, hannah) -> not Attentive(hannah)\nforall x (Stenograph(x, ash) and not Attentive(ash) -> Slosh(x, hannah))\nforall x (Throne(x, ash) -> Slosh(x, hannah))\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) and not Attentive(x) -> Throne(x, ash))\nforall x (Dominating(x) and not Throne(x, hannah) -> Throne(x, ash))\n\nStenograph(ash, hannah)\n\ntherefore Stenograph(ash, hannah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The lucretia does not chase the stanislaw. The lucretia does not eat the gusella. The lucretia customise the stanislaw. The lucretia is not epidermic. The lucretia is sacred. The lucretia does not need the gusella. The lucretia crackle the stanislaw. The gusella devour the lucretia. The gusella customise the lucretia. The gusella customise the stanislaw. The gusella crackle the lucretia. The gusella does not need the stanislaw. The stanislaw customise the lucretia. The stanislaw is detractive. The stanislaw is juristic. The stanislaw crackle the gusella. If something crackle the gusella then it does not chase the lucretia. If the gusella is sacred and the gusella does not eat the lucretia then the lucretia is not sacred. If something customise the gusella and the gusella is not sacred then it crackle the lucretia. If something devour the gusella then it crackle the lucretia. If something is epidermic and not sacred then it devour the gusella. If something is detractive and it does not chase the lucretia then it devour the gusella. The gusella does not need the lucretia.", "logic": "\nnot Devour(lucretia, stanislaw)\nnot Customise(lucretia, gusella)\nCustomise(lucretia, stanislaw)\nnot Epidermic(lucretia)\nSacred(lucretia)\nnot Crackle(lucretia, gusella)\nCrackle(lucretia, stanislaw)\nDevour(gusella, lucretia)\nCustomise(gusella, lucretia)\nCustomise(gusella, stanislaw)\nCrackle(gusella, lucretia)\nnot Crackle(gusella, stanislaw)\nCustomise(stanislaw, lucretia)\nDetractive(stanislaw)\nJuristic(stanislaw)\nCrackle(stanislaw, gusella)\nforall x (Crackle(x, gusella) -> not Devour(x, lucretia))\nSacred(gusella) and not Customise(gusella, lucretia) -> not Sacred(lucretia)\nforall x (Customise(x, gusella) and not Sacred(gusella) -> Crackle(x, lucretia))\nforall x (Devour(x, gusella) -> Crackle(x, lucretia))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) and not Sacred(x) -> Devour(x, gusella))\nforall x (Detractive(x) and not Devour(x, lucretia) -> Devour(x, gusella))\n\nnot Crackle(gusella, lucretia)\n\ntherefore Crackle(gusella, lucretia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The ros does not chase the ronny. The ros does not eat the libbie. The ros assuage the ronny. The ros is not mural. The ros is desirable. The ros does not need the libbie. The ros school the ronny. The libbie snuggle the ros. The libbie assuage the ros. The libbie assuage the ronny. The libbie school the ros. The libbie does not need the ronny. The ronny assuage the ros. The ronny is trillion. The ronny is unmelted. The ronny school the libbie. If something school the libbie then it does not chase the ros. If the libbie is desirable and the libbie does not eat the ros then the ros is not desirable. If something assuage the libbie and the libbie is not desirable then it school the ros. If something snuggle the libbie then it school the ros. If something is mural and not desirable then it snuggle the libbie. If something is trillion and it does not chase the ros then it snuggle the libbie. The ronny does not chase the ros.", "logic": "\nnot Snuggle(ros, ronny)\nnot Assuage(ros, libbie)\nAssuage(ros, ronny)\nnot Mural(ros)\nDesirable(ros)\nnot School(ros, libbie)\nSchool(ros, ronny)\nSnuggle(libbie, ros)\nAssuage(libbie, ros)\nAssuage(libbie, ronny)\nSchool(libbie, ros)\nnot School(libbie, ronny)\nAssuage(ronny, ros)\nTrillion(ronny)\nUnmelted(ronny)\nSchool(ronny, libbie)\nforall x (School(x, libbie) -> not Snuggle(x, ros))\nDesirable(libbie) and not Assuage(libbie, ros) -> not Desirable(ros)\nforall x (Assuage(x, libbie) and not Desirable(libbie) -> School(x, ros))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, libbie) -> School(x, ros))\nforall x (Mural(x) and not Desirable(x) -> Snuggle(x, libbie))\nforall x (Trillion(x) and not Snuggle(x, ros) -> Snuggle(x, libbie))\n\nnot Snuggle(ronny, ros)\n\nSchool(ronny, libbie) and forall x (School(x, libbie) -> not Snuggle(x, ros)) -> therefore not Snuggle(ronny, ros)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The jonis does not chase the iris. The jonis does not eat the kissie. The jonis acetylate the iris. The jonis is not uncurved. The jonis is frayed. The jonis does not need the kissie. The jonis rafter the iris. The kissie optimize the jonis. The kissie acetylate the jonis. The kissie acetylate the iris. The kissie rafter the jonis. The kissie does not need the iris. The iris acetylate the jonis. The iris is mortified. The iris is waning. The iris rafter the kissie. If something rafter the kissie then it does not chase the jonis. If the kissie is frayed and the kissie does not eat the jonis then the jonis is not frayed. If something acetylate the kissie and the kissie is not frayed then it rafter the jonis. If something optimize the kissie then it rafter the jonis. If something is uncurved and not frayed then it optimize the kissie. If something is mortified and it does not chase the jonis then it optimize the kissie. The iris optimize the jonis.", "logic": "\nnot Optimize(jonis, iris)\nnot Acetylate(jonis, kissie)\nAcetylate(jonis, iris)\nnot Uncurved(jonis)\nFrayed(jonis)\nnot Rafter(jonis, kissie)\nRafter(jonis, iris)\nOptimize(kissie, jonis)\nAcetylate(kissie, jonis)\nAcetylate(kissie, iris)\nRafter(kissie, jonis)\nnot Rafter(kissie, iris)\nAcetylate(iris, jonis)\nMortified(iris)\nWaning(iris)\nRafter(iris, kissie)\nforall x (Rafter(x, kissie) -> not Optimize(x, jonis))\nFrayed(kissie) and not Acetylate(kissie, jonis) -> not Frayed(jonis)\nforall x (Acetylate(x, kissie) and not Frayed(kissie) -> Rafter(x, jonis))\nforall x (Optimize(x, kissie) -> Rafter(x, jonis))\nforall x (Uncurved(x) and not Frayed(x) -> Optimize(x, kissie))\nforall x (Mortified(x) and not Optimize(x, jonis) -> Optimize(x, kissie))\n\nOptimize(iris, jonis)\n\nRafter(iris, kissie) and forall x (Rafter(x, kissie) -> not Optimize(x, jonis)) -> therefore not Optimize(iris, jonis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The jordanna does not chase the kass. The jordanna does not eat the micaela. The jordanna preachify the kass. The jordanna is not opposite. The jordanna is remediable. The jordanna does not need the micaela. The jordanna pomade the kass. The micaela linearise the jordanna. The micaela preachify the jordanna. The micaela preachify the kass. The micaela pomade the jordanna. The micaela does not need the kass. The kass preachify the jordanna. The kass is baptized. The kass is cerebellar. The kass pomade the micaela. If something pomade the micaela then it does not chase the jordanna. If the micaela is remediable and the micaela does not eat the jordanna then the jordanna is not remediable. If something preachify the micaela and the micaela is not remediable then it pomade the jordanna. If something linearise the micaela then it pomade the jordanna. If something is opposite and not remediable then it linearise the micaela. If something is baptized and it does not chase the jordanna then it linearise the micaela. The kass linearise the micaela.", "logic": "\nnot Linearise(jordanna, kass)\nnot Preachify(jordanna, micaela)\nPreachify(jordanna, kass)\nnot Opposite(jordanna)\nRemediable(jordanna)\nnot Pomade(jordanna, micaela)\nPomade(jordanna, kass)\nLinearise(micaela, jordanna)\nPreachify(micaela, jordanna)\nPreachify(micaela, kass)\nPomade(micaela, jordanna)\nnot Pomade(micaela, kass)\nPreachify(kass, jordanna)\nBaptized(kass)\nCerebellar(kass)\nPomade(kass, micaela)\nforall x (Pomade(x, micaela) -> not Linearise(x, jordanna))\nRemediable(micaela) and not Preachify(micaela, jordanna) -> not Remediable(jordanna)\nforall x (Preachify(x, micaela) and not Remediable(micaela) -> Pomade(x, jordanna))\nforall x (Linearise(x, micaela) -> Pomade(x, jordanna))\nforall x (Opposite(x) and not Remediable(x) -> Linearise(x, micaela))\nforall x (Baptized(x) and not Linearise(x, jordanna) -> Linearise(x, micaela))\n\nLinearise(kass, micaela)\n\nPomade(kass, micaela) and forall x (Pomade(x, micaela) -> not Linearise(x, jordanna)) -> therefore not Linearise(kass, jordanna) Baptized(kass) and not Linearise(kass, jordanna) and forall x (Baptized(x) and not Linearise(x, jordanna) -> Linearise(x, micaela)) -> therefore Linearise(kass, micaela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The simon does not chase the durand. The simon does not eat the barth. The simon commove the durand. The simon is not tetragonal. The simon is judicable. The simon does not need the barth. The simon inherit the durand. The barth exsiccate the simon. The barth commove the simon. The barth commove the durand. The barth inherit the simon. The barth does not need the durand. The durand commove the simon. The durand is unfastened. The durand is follicular. The durand inherit the barth. If something inherit the barth then it does not chase the simon. If the barth is judicable and the barth does not eat the simon then the simon is not judicable. If something commove the barth and the barth is not judicable then it inherit the simon. If something exsiccate the barth then it inherit the simon. If something is tetragonal and not judicable then it exsiccate the barth. If something is unfastened and it does not chase the simon then it exsiccate the barth. The durand does not chase the barth.", "logic": "\nnot Exsiccate(simon, durand)\nnot Commove(simon, barth)\nCommove(simon, durand)\nnot Tetragonal(simon)\nJudicable(simon)\nnot Inherit(simon, barth)\nInherit(simon, durand)\nExsiccate(barth, simon)\nCommove(barth, simon)\nCommove(barth, durand)\nInherit(barth, simon)\nnot Inherit(barth, durand)\nCommove(durand, simon)\nUnfastened(durand)\nFollicular(durand)\nInherit(durand, barth)\nforall x (Inherit(x, barth) -> not Exsiccate(x, simon))\nJudicable(barth) and not Commove(barth, simon) -> not Judicable(simon)\nforall x (Commove(x, barth) and not Judicable(barth) -> Inherit(x, simon))\nforall x (Exsiccate(x, barth) -> Inherit(x, simon))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and not Judicable(x) -> Exsiccate(x, barth))\nforall x (Unfastened(x) and not Exsiccate(x, simon) -> Exsiccate(x, barth))\n\nnot Exsiccate(durand, barth)\n\nInherit(durand, barth) and forall x (Inherit(x, barth) -> not Exsiccate(x, simon)) -> therefore not Exsiccate(durand, simon) Unfastened(durand) and not Exsiccate(durand, simon) and forall x (Unfastened(x) and not Exsiccate(x, simon) -> Exsiccate(x, barth)) -> therefore Exsiccate(durand, barth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The norwood does not chase the claudie. The norwood does not eat the idaline. The norwood footslog the claudie. The norwood is not changing. The norwood is pontifical. The norwood does not need the idaline. The norwood forsake the claudie. The idaline pine the norwood. The idaline footslog the norwood. The idaline footslog the claudie. The idaline forsake the norwood. The idaline does not need the claudie. The claudie footslog the norwood. The claudie is hindoo. The claudie is prognostic. The claudie forsake the idaline. If something forsake the idaline then it does not chase the norwood. If the idaline is pontifical and the idaline does not eat the norwood then the norwood is not pontifical. If something footslog the idaline and the idaline is not pontifical then it forsake the norwood. If something pine the idaline then it forsake the norwood. If something is changing and not pontifical then it pine the idaline. If something is hindoo and it does not chase the norwood then it pine the idaline. The claudie forsake the norwood.", "logic": "\nnot Pine(norwood, claudie)\nnot Footslog(norwood, idaline)\nFootslog(norwood, claudie)\nnot Changing(norwood)\nPontifical(norwood)\nnot Forsake(norwood, idaline)\nForsake(norwood, claudie)\nPine(idaline, norwood)\nFootslog(idaline, norwood)\nFootslog(idaline, claudie)\nForsake(idaline, norwood)\nnot Forsake(idaline, claudie)\nFootslog(claudie, norwood)\nHindoo(claudie)\nPrognostic(claudie)\nForsake(claudie, idaline)\nforall x (Forsake(x, idaline) -> not Pine(x, norwood))\nPontifical(idaline) and not Footslog(idaline, norwood) -> not Pontifical(norwood)\nforall x (Footslog(x, idaline) and not Pontifical(idaline) -> Forsake(x, norwood))\nforall x (Pine(x, idaline) -> Forsake(x, norwood))\nforall x (Changing(x) and not Pontifical(x) -> Pine(x, idaline))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) and not Pine(x, norwood) -> Pine(x, idaline))\n\nForsake(claudie, norwood)\n\nForsake(claudie, idaline) and forall x (Forsake(x, idaline) -> not Pine(x, norwood)) -> therefore not Pine(claudie, norwood) Hindoo(claudie) and not Pine(claudie, norwood) and forall x (Hindoo(x) and not Pine(x, norwood) -> Pine(x, idaline)) -> therefore Pine(claudie, idaline) Pine(claudie, idaline) and forall x (Pine(x, idaline) -> Forsake(x, norwood)) -> therefore Forsake(claudie, norwood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The celle does not chase the carlee. The celle does not eat the ahmet. The celle scry the carlee. The celle is not rueful. The celle is craggy. The celle does not need the ahmet. The celle gown the carlee. The ahmet transport the celle. The ahmet scry the celle. The ahmet scry the carlee. The ahmet gown the celle. The ahmet does not need the carlee. The carlee scry the celle. The carlee is diluvian. The carlee is patriotic. The carlee gown the ahmet. If something gown the ahmet then it does not chase the celle. If the ahmet is craggy and the ahmet does not eat the celle then the celle is not craggy. If something scry the ahmet and the ahmet is not craggy then it gown the celle. If something transport the ahmet then it gown the celle. If something is rueful and not craggy then it transport the ahmet. If something is diluvian and it does not chase the celle then it transport the ahmet. The carlee does not need the celle.", "logic": "\nnot Transport(celle, carlee)\nnot Scry(celle, ahmet)\nScry(celle, carlee)\nnot Rueful(celle)\nCraggy(celle)\nnot Gown(celle, ahmet)\nGown(celle, carlee)\nTransport(ahmet, celle)\nScry(ahmet, celle)\nScry(ahmet, carlee)\nGown(ahmet, celle)\nnot Gown(ahmet, carlee)\nScry(carlee, celle)\nDiluvian(carlee)\nPatriotic(carlee)\nGown(carlee, ahmet)\nforall x (Gown(x, ahmet) -> not Transport(x, celle))\nCraggy(ahmet) and not Scry(ahmet, celle) -> not Craggy(celle)\nforall x (Scry(x, ahmet) and not Craggy(ahmet) -> Gown(x, celle))\nforall x (Transport(x, ahmet) -> Gown(x, celle))\nforall x (Rueful(x) and not Craggy(x) -> Transport(x, ahmet))\nforall x (Diluvian(x) and not Transport(x, celle) -> Transport(x, ahmet))\n\nnot Gown(carlee, celle)\n\nGown(carlee, ahmet) and forall x (Gown(x, ahmet) -> not Transport(x, celle)) -> therefore not Transport(carlee, celle) Diluvian(carlee) and not Transport(carlee, celle) and forall x (Diluvian(x) and not Transport(x, celle) -> Transport(x, ahmet)) -> therefore Transport(carlee, ahmet) Transport(carlee, ahmet) and forall x (Transport(x, ahmet) -> Gown(x, celle)) -> therefore Gown(carlee, celle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The tiphany does not chase the rolfe. The tiphany does not eat the misty. The tiphany overgorge the rolfe. The tiphany is not anaclitic. The tiphany is edentulate. The tiphany does not need the misty. The tiphany succor the rolfe. The misty debase the tiphany. The misty overgorge the tiphany. The misty overgorge the rolfe. The misty succor the tiphany. The misty does not need the rolfe. The rolfe overgorge the tiphany. The rolfe is austenitic. The rolfe is gassy. The rolfe succor the misty. If something succor the misty then it does not chase the tiphany. If the misty is edentulate and the misty does not eat the tiphany then the tiphany is not edentulate. If something overgorge the misty and the misty is not edentulate then it succor the tiphany. If something debase the misty then it succor the tiphany. If something is anaclitic and not edentulate then it debase the misty. If something is austenitic and it does not chase the tiphany then it debase the misty. The tiphany does not chase the misty.", "logic": "\nnot Debase(tiphany, rolfe)\nnot Overgorge(tiphany, misty)\nOvergorge(tiphany, rolfe)\nnot Anaclitic(tiphany)\nEdentulate(tiphany)\nnot Succor(tiphany, misty)\nSuccor(tiphany, rolfe)\nDebase(misty, tiphany)\nOvergorge(misty, tiphany)\nOvergorge(misty, rolfe)\nSuccor(misty, tiphany)\nnot Succor(misty, rolfe)\nOvergorge(rolfe, tiphany)\nAustenitic(rolfe)\nGassy(rolfe)\nSuccor(rolfe, misty)\nforall x (Succor(x, misty) -> not Debase(x, tiphany))\nEdentulate(misty) and not Overgorge(misty, tiphany) -> not Edentulate(tiphany)\nforall x (Overgorge(x, misty) and not Edentulate(misty) -> Succor(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Debase(x, misty) -> Succor(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and not Edentulate(x) -> Debase(x, misty))\nforall x (Austenitic(x) and not Debase(x, tiphany) -> Debase(x, misty))\n\nnot Debase(tiphany, misty)\n\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and not Edentulate(x) -> Debase(x, misty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The nadia does not chase the teresita. The nadia does not eat the isadore. The nadia chorus the teresita. The nadia is not unsightly. The nadia is offstage. The nadia does not need the isadore. The nadia squeal the teresita. The isadore shadowbox the nadia. The isadore chorus the nadia. The isadore chorus the teresita. The isadore squeal the nadia. The isadore does not need the teresita. The teresita chorus the nadia. The teresita is auctorial. The teresita is unmelted. The teresita squeal the isadore. If something squeal the isadore then it does not chase the nadia. If the isadore is offstage and the isadore does not eat the nadia then the nadia is not offstage. If something chorus the isadore and the isadore is not offstage then it squeal the nadia. If something shadowbox the isadore then it squeal the nadia. If something is unsightly and not offstage then it shadowbox the isadore. If something is auctorial and it does not chase the nadia then it shadowbox the isadore. The nadia squeal the nadia.", "logic": "\nnot Shadowbox(nadia, teresita)\nnot Chorus(nadia, isadore)\nChorus(nadia, teresita)\nnot Unsightly(nadia)\nOffstage(nadia)\nnot Squeal(nadia, isadore)\nSqueal(nadia, teresita)\nShadowbox(isadore, nadia)\nChorus(isadore, nadia)\nChorus(isadore, teresita)\nSqueal(isadore, nadia)\nnot Squeal(isadore, teresita)\nChorus(teresita, nadia)\nAuctorial(teresita)\nUnmelted(teresita)\nSqueal(teresita, isadore)\nforall x (Squeal(x, isadore) -> not Shadowbox(x, nadia))\nOffstage(isadore) and not Chorus(isadore, nadia) -> not Offstage(nadia)\nforall x (Chorus(x, isadore) and not Offstage(isadore) -> Squeal(x, nadia))\nforall x (Shadowbox(x, isadore) -> Squeal(x, nadia))\nforall x (Unsightly(x) and not Offstage(x) -> Shadowbox(x, isadore))\nforall x (Auctorial(x) and not Shadowbox(x, nadia) -> Shadowbox(x, isadore))\n\nSqueal(nadia, nadia)\n\nforall x (Shadowbox(x, isadore) -> Squeal(x, nadia)) <- forall x (Unsightly(x) and not Offstage(x) -> Shadowbox(x, isadore)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The gweneth does not chase the ulrica. The gweneth does not eat the malynda. The gweneth vitalise the ulrica. The gweneth is not unhoped. The gweneth is shriveled. The gweneth does not need the malynda. The gweneth enmesh the ulrica. The malynda disinvest the gweneth. The malynda vitalise the gweneth. The malynda vitalise the ulrica. The malynda enmesh the gweneth. The malynda does not need the ulrica. The ulrica vitalise the gweneth. The ulrica is vegetive. The ulrica is stabilized. The ulrica enmesh the malynda. If something enmesh the malynda then it does not chase the gweneth. If the malynda is shriveled and the malynda does not eat the gweneth then the gweneth is not shriveled. If something vitalise the malynda and the malynda is not shriveled then it enmesh the gweneth. If something disinvest the malynda then it enmesh the gweneth. If something is unhoped and not shriveled then it disinvest the malynda. If something is vegetive and it does not chase the gweneth then it disinvest the malynda. The malynda does not chase the malynda.", "logic": "\nnot Disinvest(gweneth, ulrica)\nnot Vitalise(gweneth, malynda)\nVitalise(gweneth, ulrica)\nnot Unhoped(gweneth)\nShriveled(gweneth)\nnot Enmesh(gweneth, malynda)\nEnmesh(gweneth, ulrica)\nDisinvest(malynda, gweneth)\nVitalise(malynda, gweneth)\nVitalise(malynda, ulrica)\nEnmesh(malynda, gweneth)\nnot Enmesh(malynda, ulrica)\nVitalise(ulrica, gweneth)\nVegetive(ulrica)\nStabilized(ulrica)\nEnmesh(ulrica, malynda)\nforall x (Enmesh(x, malynda) -> not Disinvest(x, gweneth))\nShriveled(malynda) and not Vitalise(malynda, gweneth) -> not Shriveled(gweneth)\nforall x (Vitalise(x, malynda) and not Shriveled(malynda) -> Enmesh(x, gweneth))\nforall x (Disinvest(x, malynda) -> Enmesh(x, gweneth))\nforall x (Unhoped(x) and not Shriveled(x) -> Disinvest(x, malynda))\nforall x (Vegetive(x) and not Disinvest(x, gweneth) -> Disinvest(x, malynda))\n\nnot Disinvest(malynda, malynda)\n\nforall x (Unhoped(x) and not Shriveled(x) -> Disinvest(x, malynda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The tersina does not chase the thaddius. The tersina does not eat the audra. The tersina crab the thaddius. The tersina is not papist. The tersina is useable. The tersina does not need the audra. The tersina goldplate the thaddius. The audra establish the tersina. The audra crab the tersina. The audra crab the thaddius. The audra goldplate the tersina. The audra does not need the thaddius. The thaddius crab the tersina. The thaddius is soviet. The thaddius is faded. The thaddius goldplate the audra. If something goldplate the audra then it does not chase the tersina. If the audra is useable and the audra does not eat the tersina then the tersina is not useable. If something crab the audra and the audra is not useable then it goldplate the tersina. If something establish the audra then it goldplate the tersina. If something is papist and not useable then it establish the audra. If something is soviet and it does not chase the tersina then it establish the audra. The audra is blue.", "logic": "\nnot Establish(tersina, thaddius)\nnot Crab(tersina, audra)\nCrab(tersina, thaddius)\nnot Papist(tersina)\nUseable(tersina)\nnot Goldplate(tersina, audra)\nGoldplate(tersina, thaddius)\nEstablish(audra, tersina)\nCrab(audra, tersina)\nCrab(audra, thaddius)\nGoldplate(audra, tersina)\nnot Goldplate(audra, thaddius)\nCrab(thaddius, tersina)\nSoviet(thaddius)\nFaded(thaddius)\nGoldplate(thaddius, audra)\nforall x (Goldplate(x, audra) -> not Establish(x, tersina))\nUseable(audra) and not Crab(audra, tersina) -> not Useable(tersina)\nforall x (Crab(x, audra) and not Useable(audra) -> Goldplate(x, tersina))\nforall x (Establish(x, audra) -> Goldplate(x, tersina))\nforall x (Papist(x) and not Useable(x) -> Establish(x, audra))\nforall x (Soviet(x) and not Establish(x, tersina) -> Establish(x, audra))\n\nBlue(audra)\n\nBlue(audra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The tomlin does not chase the nealy. The tomlin does not eat the vania. The tomlin lower the nealy. The tomlin is not ribald. The tomlin is sanguine. The tomlin does not need the vania. The tomlin influence the nealy. The vania swallow the tomlin. The vania lower the tomlin. The vania lower the nealy. The vania influence the tomlin. The vania does not need the nealy. The nealy lower the tomlin. The nealy is windless. The nealy is degage. The nealy influence the vania. If something influence the vania then it does not chase the tomlin. If the vania is sanguine and the vania does not eat the tomlin then the tomlin is not sanguine. If something lower the vania and the vania is not sanguine then it influence the tomlin. If something swallow the vania then it influence the tomlin. If something is ribald and not sanguine then it swallow the vania. If something is windless and it does not chase the tomlin then it swallow the vania. The vania does not chase the nealy.", "logic": "\nnot Swallow(tomlin, nealy)\nnot Lower(tomlin, vania)\nLower(tomlin, nealy)\nnot Ribald(tomlin)\nSanguine(tomlin)\nnot Influence(tomlin, vania)\nInfluence(tomlin, nealy)\nSwallow(vania, tomlin)\nLower(vania, tomlin)\nLower(vania, nealy)\nInfluence(vania, tomlin)\nnot Influence(vania, nealy)\nLower(nealy, tomlin)\nWindless(nealy)\nDegage(nealy)\nInfluence(nealy, vania)\nforall x (Influence(x, vania) -> not Swallow(x, tomlin))\nSanguine(vania) and not Lower(vania, tomlin) -> not Sanguine(tomlin)\nforall x (Lower(x, vania) and not Sanguine(vania) -> Influence(x, tomlin))\nforall x (Swallow(x, vania) -> Influence(x, tomlin))\nforall x (Ribald(x) and not Sanguine(x) -> Swallow(x, vania))\nforall x (Windless(x) and not Swallow(x, tomlin) -> Swallow(x, vania))\n\nnot Swallow(vania, nealy)\n\nnot Swallow(vania, nealy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The jessalyn does not chase the shira. The jessalyn does not eat the elinore. The jessalyn mottle the shira. The jessalyn is not fistulate. The jessalyn is unblended. The jessalyn does not need the elinore. The jessalyn bebop the shira. The elinore flurry the jessalyn. The elinore mottle the jessalyn. The elinore mottle the shira. The elinore bebop the jessalyn. The elinore does not need the shira. The shira mottle the jessalyn. The shira is aqueous. The shira is choice. The shira bebop the elinore. If something bebop the elinore then it does not chase the jessalyn. If the elinore is unblended and the elinore does not eat the jessalyn then the jessalyn is not unblended. If something mottle the elinore and the elinore is not unblended then it bebop the jessalyn. If something flurry the elinore then it bebop the jessalyn. If something is fistulate and not unblended then it flurry the elinore. If something is aqueous and it does not chase the jessalyn then it flurry the elinore. The jessalyn is choice.", "logic": "\nnot Flurry(jessalyn, shira)\nnot Mottle(jessalyn, elinore)\nMottle(jessalyn, shira)\nnot Fistulate(jessalyn)\nUnblended(jessalyn)\nnot Bebop(jessalyn, elinore)\nBebop(jessalyn, shira)\nFlurry(elinore, jessalyn)\nMottle(elinore, jessalyn)\nMottle(elinore, shira)\nBebop(elinore, jessalyn)\nnot Bebop(elinore, shira)\nMottle(shira, jessalyn)\nAqueous(shira)\nChoice(shira)\nBebop(shira, elinore)\nforall x (Bebop(x, elinore) -> not Flurry(x, jessalyn))\nUnblended(elinore) and not Mottle(elinore, jessalyn) -> not Unblended(jessalyn)\nforall x (Mottle(x, elinore) and not Unblended(elinore) -> Bebop(x, jessalyn))\nforall x (Flurry(x, elinore) -> Bebop(x, jessalyn))\nforall x (Fistulate(x) and not Unblended(x) -> Flurry(x, elinore))\nforall x (Aqueous(x) and not Flurry(x, jessalyn) -> Flurry(x, elinore))\n\nChoice(jessalyn)\n\nChoice(jessalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The shelbi does not chase the caresse. The shelbi does not eat the clarisse. The shelbi dare the caresse. The shelbi is not pimpled. The shelbi is cytolytic. The shelbi does not need the clarisse. The shelbi beggar the caresse. The clarisse rubberise the shelbi. The clarisse dare the shelbi. The clarisse dare the caresse. The clarisse beggar the shelbi. The clarisse does not need the caresse. The caresse dare the shelbi. The caresse is cryptical. The caresse is deaf. The caresse beggar the clarisse. If something beggar the clarisse then it does not chase the shelbi. If the clarisse is cytolytic and the clarisse does not eat the shelbi then the shelbi is not cytolytic. If something dare the clarisse and the clarisse is not cytolytic then it beggar the shelbi. If something rubberise the clarisse then it beggar the shelbi. If something is pimpled and not cytolytic then it rubberise the clarisse. If something is cryptical and it does not chase the shelbi then it rubberise the clarisse. The caresse does not eat the clarisse.", "logic": "\nnot Rubberise(shelbi, caresse)\nnot Dare(shelbi, clarisse)\nDare(shelbi, caresse)\nnot Pimpled(shelbi)\nCytolytic(shelbi)\nnot Beggar(shelbi, clarisse)\nBeggar(shelbi, caresse)\nRubberise(clarisse, shelbi)\nDare(clarisse, shelbi)\nDare(clarisse, caresse)\nBeggar(clarisse, shelbi)\nnot Beggar(clarisse, caresse)\nDare(caresse, shelbi)\nCryptical(caresse)\nDeaf(caresse)\nBeggar(caresse, clarisse)\nforall x (Beggar(x, clarisse) -> not Rubberise(x, shelbi))\nCytolytic(clarisse) and not Dare(clarisse, shelbi) -> not Cytolytic(shelbi)\nforall x (Dare(x, clarisse) and not Cytolytic(clarisse) -> Beggar(x, shelbi))\nforall x (Rubberise(x, clarisse) -> Beggar(x, shelbi))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) and not Cytolytic(x) -> Rubberise(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Cryptical(x) and not Rubberise(x, shelbi) -> Rubberise(x, clarisse))\n\nnot Dare(caresse, clarisse)\n\nnot Dare(caresse, clarisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The west does not chase the walter. The west does not eat the tamera. The west handcraft the walter. The west is not kingly. The west is iatrogenic. The west does not need the tamera. The west chiromance the walter. The tamera cosponsor the west. The tamera handcraft the west. The tamera handcraft the walter. The tamera chiromance the west. The tamera does not need the walter. The walter handcraft the west. The walter is neglected. The walter is actinoid. The walter chiromance the tamera. If something chiromance the tamera then it does not chase the west. If the tamera is iatrogenic and the tamera does not eat the west then the west is not iatrogenic. If something handcraft the tamera and the tamera is not iatrogenic then it chiromance the west. If something cosponsor the tamera then it chiromance the west. If something is kingly and not iatrogenic then it cosponsor the tamera. If something is neglected and it does not chase the west then it cosponsor the tamera. The tamera handcraft the tamera.", "logic": "\nnot Cosponsor(west, walter)\nnot Handcraft(west, tamera)\nHandcraft(west, walter)\nnot Kingly(west)\nIatrogenic(west)\nnot Chiromance(west, tamera)\nChiromance(west, walter)\nCosponsor(tamera, west)\nHandcraft(tamera, west)\nHandcraft(tamera, walter)\nChiromance(tamera, west)\nnot Chiromance(tamera, walter)\nHandcraft(walter, west)\nNeglected(walter)\nActinoid(walter)\nChiromance(walter, tamera)\nforall x (Chiromance(x, tamera) -> not Cosponsor(x, west))\nIatrogenic(tamera) and not Handcraft(tamera, west) -> not Iatrogenic(west)\nforall x (Handcraft(x, tamera) and not Iatrogenic(tamera) -> Chiromance(x, west))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, tamera) -> Chiromance(x, west))\nforall x (Kingly(x) and not Iatrogenic(x) -> Cosponsor(x, tamera))\nforall x (Neglected(x) and not Cosponsor(x, west) -> Cosponsor(x, tamera))\n\nHandcraft(tamera, tamera)\n\nHandcraft(tamera, tamera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "Ebeneser is fifty. Ebeneser is cilial. Ebeneser is robustious. Ebeneser is lendable. Malynda is fifty. Malynda is foggy. Malynda is albitic. Malynda is lendable. Kissee is foggy. Doretta is cilial. Nice things are foggy. Cold things are cilial. If Kissee is albitic then Kissee is robustious. If something is fifty and albitic then it is draining. Smart, robustious things are albitic. If Malynda is draining and Malynda is foggy then Malynda is lendable. Malynda is foggy.", "logic": "\nFifty(ebeneser)\nCilial(ebeneser)\nRobustious(ebeneser)\nLendable(ebeneser)\nFifty(malynda)\nFoggy(malynda)\nAlbitic(malynda)\nLendable(malynda)\nFoggy(kissee)\nCilial(doretta)\nforall x (Draining(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Cilial(x))\nAlbitic(kissee) -> Robustious(kissee)\nforall x (Fifty(x) and Albitic(x) -> Draining(x))\nforall x (Lendable(x) and Robustious(x) -> Albitic(x))\nDraining(malynda) and Foggy(malynda) -> Lendable(malynda)\n\nFoggy(malynda)\n\ntherefore Foggy(malynda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Lari is epizootic. Lari is unmated. Lari is orchestral. Lari is snarly. Ward is epizootic. Ward is heraldic. Ward is direct. Ward is snarly. Layla is heraldic. Sim is unmated. Nice things are heraldic. Cold things are unmated. If Layla is direct then Layla is orchestral. If something is epizootic and direct then it is classified. Smart, orchestral things are direct. If Ward is classified and Ward is heraldic then Ward is snarly. Ward is not direct.", "logic": "\nEpizootic(lari)\nUnmated(lari)\nOrchestral(lari)\nSnarly(lari)\nEpizootic(ward)\nHeraldic(ward)\nDirect(ward)\nSnarly(ward)\nHeraldic(layla)\nUnmated(sim)\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Heraldic(x) -> Unmated(x))\nDirect(layla) -> Orchestral(layla)\nforall x (Epizootic(x) and Direct(x) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) and Orchestral(x) -> Direct(x))\nClassified(ward) and Heraldic(ward) -> Snarly(ward)\n\nnot Direct(ward)\n\ntherefore Direct(ward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Rene is effusive. Rene is brash. Rene is sorbed. Rene is raspy. Myrtie is effusive. Myrtie is wavering. Myrtie is exsanguine. Myrtie is raspy. Avivah is wavering. Lottie is brash. Nice things are wavering. Cold things are brash. If Avivah is exsanguine then Avivah is sorbed. If something is effusive and exsanguine then it is witching. Smart, sorbed things are exsanguine. If Myrtie is witching and Myrtie is wavering then Myrtie is raspy. Myrtie is witching.", "logic": "\nEffusive(rene)\nBrash(rene)\nSorbed(rene)\nRaspy(rene)\nEffusive(myrtie)\nWavering(myrtie)\nExsanguine(myrtie)\nRaspy(myrtie)\nWavering(avivah)\nBrash(lottie)\nforall x (Witching(x) -> Wavering(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Brash(x))\nExsanguine(avivah) -> Sorbed(avivah)\nforall x (Effusive(x) and Exsanguine(x) -> Witching(x))\nforall x (Raspy(x) and Sorbed(x) -> Exsanguine(x))\nWitching(myrtie) and Wavering(myrtie) -> Raspy(myrtie)\n\nWitching(myrtie)\n\nEffusive(myrtie) and Exsanguine(myrtie) and forall x (Effusive(x) and Exsanguine(x) -> Witching(x)) -> therefore Witching(myrtie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Paulita is unkindly. Paulita is latino. Paulita is runny. Paulita is lowered. Tarrah is unkindly. Tarrah is phyletic. Tarrah is impeccant. Tarrah is lowered. Frankie is phyletic. Deeanne is latino. Nice things are phyletic. Cold things are latino. If Frankie is impeccant then Frankie is runny. If something is unkindly and impeccant then it is homeless. Smart, runny things are impeccant. If Tarrah is homeless and Tarrah is phyletic then Tarrah is lowered. Frankie is not latino.", "logic": "\nUnkindly(paulita)\nLatino(paulita)\nRunny(paulita)\nLowered(paulita)\nUnkindly(tarrah)\nPhyletic(tarrah)\nImpeccant(tarrah)\nLowered(tarrah)\nPhyletic(frankie)\nLatino(deeanne)\nforall x (Homeless(x) -> Phyletic(x))\nforall x (Phyletic(x) -> Latino(x))\nImpeccant(frankie) -> Runny(frankie)\nforall x (Unkindly(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Homeless(x))\nforall x (Lowered(x) and Runny(x) -> Impeccant(x))\nHomeless(tarrah) and Phyletic(tarrah) -> Lowered(tarrah)\n\nnot Latino(frankie)\n\nPhyletic(frankie) and forall x (Phyletic(x) -> Latino(x)) -> therefore Latino(frankie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Sileas is teen. Sileas is absurd. Sileas is smothered. Sileas is renewing. Faydra is teen. Faydra is abounding. Faydra is giddy. Faydra is renewing. Sarajane is abounding. Wilfrid is absurd. Nice things are abounding. Cold things are absurd. If Sarajane is giddy then Sarajane is smothered. If something is teen and giddy then it is chantlike. Smart, smothered things are giddy. If Faydra is chantlike and Faydra is abounding then Faydra is renewing. Sileas is chantlike.", "logic": "\nTeen(sileas)\nAbsurd(sileas)\nSmothered(sileas)\nRenewing(sileas)\nTeen(faydra)\nAbounding(faydra)\nGiddy(faydra)\nRenewing(faydra)\nAbounding(sarajane)\nAbsurd(wilfrid)\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> Abounding(x))\nforall x (Abounding(x) -> Absurd(x))\nGiddy(sarajane) -> Smothered(sarajane)\nforall x (Teen(x) and Giddy(x) -> Chantlike(x))\nforall x (Renewing(x) and Smothered(x) -> Giddy(x))\nChantlike(faydra) and Abounding(faydra) -> Renewing(faydra)\n\nChantlike(sileas)\n\nRenewing(sileas) and Smothered(sileas) and forall x (Renewing(x) and Smothered(x) -> Giddy(x)) -> therefore Giddy(sileas) Teen(sileas) and Giddy(sileas) and forall x (Teen(x) and Giddy(x) -> Chantlike(x)) -> therefore Chantlike(sileas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Rhianna is acrophobic. Rhianna is critical. Rhianna is headless. Rhianna is nineteen. Welbie is acrophobic. Welbie is foaming. Welbie is oviform. Welbie is nineteen. Kylynn is foaming. Ardenia is critical. Nice things are foaming. Cold things are critical. If Kylynn is oviform then Kylynn is headless. If something is acrophobic and oviform then it is huffish. Smart, headless things are oviform. If Welbie is huffish and Welbie is foaming then Welbie is nineteen. Rhianna is not huffish.", "logic": "\nAcrophobic(rhianna)\nCritical(rhianna)\nHeadless(rhianna)\nNineteen(rhianna)\nAcrophobic(welbie)\nFoaming(welbie)\nOviform(welbie)\nNineteen(welbie)\nFoaming(kylynn)\nCritical(ardenia)\nforall x (Huffish(x) -> Foaming(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Critical(x))\nOviform(kylynn) -> Headless(kylynn)\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) and Oviform(x) -> Huffish(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) and Headless(x) -> Oviform(x))\nHuffish(welbie) and Foaming(welbie) -> Nineteen(welbie)\n\nnot Huffish(rhianna)\n\nNineteen(rhianna) and Headless(rhianna) and forall x (Nineteen(x) and Headless(x) -> Oviform(x)) -> therefore Oviform(rhianna) Acrophobic(rhianna) and Oviform(rhianna) and forall x (Acrophobic(x) and Oviform(x) -> Huffish(x)) -> therefore Huffish(rhianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Quentin is unfitting. Quentin is chapped. Quentin is yeasty. Quentin is elated. Daisi is unfitting. Daisi is caliginous. Daisi is perennial. Daisi is elated. Kamilah is caliginous. Aleks is chapped. Nice things are caliginous. Cold things are chapped. If Kamilah is perennial then Kamilah is yeasty. If something is unfitting and perennial then it is indignant. Smart, yeasty things are perennial. If Daisi is indignant and Daisi is caliginous then Daisi is elated. Quentin is caliginous.", "logic": "\nUnfitting(quentin)\nChapped(quentin)\nYeasty(quentin)\nElated(quentin)\nUnfitting(daisi)\nCaliginous(daisi)\nPerennial(daisi)\nElated(daisi)\nCaliginous(kamilah)\nChapped(aleks)\nforall x (Indignant(x) -> Caliginous(x))\nforall x (Caliginous(x) -> Chapped(x))\nPerennial(kamilah) -> Yeasty(kamilah)\nforall x (Unfitting(x) and Perennial(x) -> Indignant(x))\nforall x (Elated(x) and Yeasty(x) -> Perennial(x))\nIndignant(daisi) and Caliginous(daisi) -> Elated(daisi)\n\nCaliginous(quentin)\n\nElated(quentin) and Yeasty(quentin) and forall x (Elated(x) and Yeasty(x) -> Perennial(x)) -> therefore Perennial(quentin) Unfitting(quentin) and Perennial(quentin) and forall x (Unfitting(x) and Perennial(x) -> Indignant(x)) -> therefore Indignant(quentin) Indignant(quentin) and forall x (Indignant(x) -> Caliginous(x)) -> therefore Caliginous(quentin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Liora is handled. Liora is gordian. Liora is feckless. Liora is mocking. Paddie is handled. Paddie is acidic. Paddie is occluded. Paddie is mocking. Glennie is acidic. Mike is gordian. Nice things are acidic. Cold things are gordian. If Glennie is occluded then Glennie is feckless. If something is handled and occluded then it is different. Smart, feckless things are occluded. If Paddie is different and Paddie is acidic then Paddie is mocking. Liora is not acidic.", "logic": "\nHandled(liora)\nGordian(liora)\nFeckless(liora)\nMocking(liora)\nHandled(paddie)\nAcidic(paddie)\nOccluded(paddie)\nMocking(paddie)\nAcidic(glennie)\nGordian(mike)\nforall x (Different(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Gordian(x))\nOccluded(glennie) -> Feckless(glennie)\nforall x (Handled(x) and Occluded(x) -> Different(x))\nforall x (Mocking(x) and Feckless(x) -> Occluded(x))\nDifferent(paddie) and Acidic(paddie) -> Mocking(paddie)\n\nnot Acidic(liora)\n\nMocking(liora) and Feckless(liora) and forall x (Mocking(x) and Feckless(x) -> Occluded(x)) -> therefore Occluded(liora) Handled(liora) and Occluded(liora) and forall x (Handled(x) and Occluded(x) -> Different(x)) -> therefore Different(liora) Different(liora) and forall x (Different(x) -> Acidic(x)) -> therefore Acidic(liora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Viola is collarless. Viola is stomachic. Viola is unworldly. Viola is admired. Rosabel is collarless. Rosabel is katabolic. Rosabel is ramose. Rosabel is admired. Georgina is katabolic. Don is stomachic. Nice things are katabolic. Cold things are stomachic. If Georgina is ramose then Georgina is unworldly. If something is collarless and ramose then it is nonleaded. Smart, unworldly things are ramose. If Rosabel is nonleaded and Rosabel is katabolic then Rosabel is admired. Georgina is not nonleaded.", "logic": "\nCollarless(viola)\nStomachic(viola)\nUnworldly(viola)\nAdmired(viola)\nCollarless(rosabel)\nKatabolic(rosabel)\nRamose(rosabel)\nAdmired(rosabel)\nKatabolic(georgina)\nStomachic(don)\nforall x (Nonleaded(x) -> Katabolic(x))\nforall x (Katabolic(x) -> Stomachic(x))\nRamose(georgina) -> Unworldly(georgina)\nforall x (Collarless(x) and Ramose(x) -> Nonleaded(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) and Unworldly(x) -> Ramose(x))\nNonleaded(rosabel) and Katabolic(rosabel) -> Admired(rosabel)\n\nnot Nonleaded(georgina)\n\nforall x (Collarless(x) and Ramose(x) -> Nonleaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Pembroke is actionable. Pembroke is humorous. Pembroke is vicious. Pembroke is watchful. Dimitrou is actionable. Dimitrou is maximum. Dimitrou is cypriot. Dimitrou is watchful. Henrietta is maximum. Avraham is humorous. Nice things are maximum. Cold things are humorous. If Henrietta is cypriot then Henrietta is vicious. If something is actionable and cypriot then it is hazy. Smart, vicious things are cypriot. If Dimitrou is hazy and Dimitrou is maximum then Dimitrou is watchful. Avraham is cypriot.", "logic": "\nActionable(pembroke)\nHumorous(pembroke)\nVicious(pembroke)\nWatchful(pembroke)\nActionable(dimitrou)\nMaximum(dimitrou)\nCypriot(dimitrou)\nWatchful(dimitrou)\nMaximum(henrietta)\nHumorous(avraham)\nforall x (Hazy(x) -> Maximum(x))\nforall x (Maximum(x) -> Humorous(x))\nCypriot(henrietta) -> Vicious(henrietta)\nforall x (Actionable(x) and Cypriot(x) -> Hazy(x))\nforall x (Watchful(x) and Vicious(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nHazy(dimitrou) and Maximum(dimitrou) -> Watchful(dimitrou)\n\nCypriot(avraham)\n\nforall x (Watchful(x) and Vicious(x) -> Cypriot(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Steward is trabeated. Steward is photic. Steward is cherubic. Steward is bribable. Andros is trabeated. Andros is unheeded. Andros is ungrasped. Andros is bribable. Christan is unheeded. Henrik is photic. Nice things are unheeded. Cold things are photic. If Christan is ungrasped then Christan is cherubic. If something is trabeated and ungrasped then it is earthy. Smart, cherubic things are ungrasped. If Andros is earthy and Andros is unheeded then Andros is bribable. Henrik is not unheeded.", "logic": "\nTrabeated(steward)\nPhotic(steward)\nCherubic(steward)\nBribable(steward)\nTrabeated(andros)\nUnheeded(andros)\nUngrasped(andros)\nBribable(andros)\nUnheeded(christan)\nPhotic(henrik)\nforall x (Earthy(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Unheeded(x) -> Photic(x))\nUngrasped(christan) -> Cherubic(christan)\nforall x (Trabeated(x) and Ungrasped(x) -> Earthy(x))\nforall x (Bribable(x) and Cherubic(x) -> Ungrasped(x))\nEarthy(andros) and Unheeded(andros) -> Bribable(andros)\n\nnot Unheeded(henrik)\n\nforall x (Earthy(x) -> Unheeded(x)) <- forall x (Trabeated(x) and Ungrasped(x) -> Earthy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Danika is untried. Danika is acinar. Danika is xxxi. Danika is goethean. Duffy is untried. Duffy is surly. Duffy is unsmoothed. Duffy is goethean. Florenza is surly. Alida is acinar. Nice things are surly. Cold things are acinar. If Florenza is unsmoothed then Florenza is xxxi. If something is untried and unsmoothed then it is cadaverous. Smart, xxxi things are unsmoothed. If Duffy is cadaverous and Duffy is surly then Duffy is goethean. Alida is cadaverous.", "logic": "\nUntried(danika)\nAcinar(danika)\nXxxi(danika)\nGoethean(danika)\nUntried(duffy)\nSurly(duffy)\nUnsmoothed(duffy)\nGoethean(duffy)\nSurly(florenza)\nAcinar(alida)\nforall x (Cadaverous(x) -> Surly(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) -> Acinar(x))\nUnsmoothed(florenza) -> Xxxi(florenza)\nforall x (Untried(x) and Unsmoothed(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Goethean(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Unsmoothed(x))\nCadaverous(duffy) and Surly(duffy) -> Goethean(duffy)\n\nCadaverous(alida)\n\nforall x (Untried(x) and Unsmoothed(x) -> Cadaverous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Agustin is alight. Agustin is toothlike. Agustin is changeless. Agustin is rude. Sella is alight. Sella is ungrasped. Sella is unspaced. Sella is rude. Maiga is ungrasped. Clarie is toothlike. Nice things are ungrasped. Cold things are toothlike. If Maiga is unspaced then Maiga is changeless. If something is alight and unspaced then it is sartorial. Smart, changeless things are unspaced. If Sella is sartorial and Sella is ungrasped then Sella is rude. Sella is not changeless.", "logic": "\nAlight(agustin)\nToothlike(agustin)\nChangeless(agustin)\nRude(agustin)\nAlight(sella)\nUngrasped(sella)\nUnspaced(sella)\nRude(sella)\nUngrasped(maiga)\nToothlike(clarie)\nforall x (Sartorial(x) -> Ungrasped(x))\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Toothlike(x))\nUnspaced(maiga) -> Changeless(maiga)\nforall x (Alight(x) and Unspaced(x) -> Sartorial(x))\nforall x (Rude(x) and Changeless(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nSartorial(sella) and Ungrasped(sella) -> Rude(sella)\n\nnot Changeless(sella)\n\nnot Changeless(sella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Vivia is stressed. Vivia is discoidal. Vivia is stoned. Vivia is strange. Kalvin is stressed. Kalvin is ectopic. Kalvin is obedient. Kalvin is strange. Elizabeth is ectopic. Thacher is discoidal. Nice things are ectopic. Cold things are discoidal. If Elizabeth is obedient then Elizabeth is stoned. If something is stressed and obedient then it is rampageous. Smart, stoned things are obedient. If Kalvin is rampageous and Kalvin is ectopic then Kalvin is strange. Thacher is strange.", "logic": "\nStressed(vivia)\nDiscoidal(vivia)\nStoned(vivia)\nStrange(vivia)\nStressed(kalvin)\nEctopic(kalvin)\nObedient(kalvin)\nStrange(kalvin)\nEctopic(elizabeth)\nDiscoidal(thacher)\nforall x (Rampageous(x) -> Ectopic(x))\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Discoidal(x))\nObedient(elizabeth) -> Stoned(elizabeth)\nforall x (Stressed(x) and Obedient(x) -> Rampageous(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) and Stoned(x) -> Obedient(x))\nRampageous(kalvin) and Ectopic(kalvin) -> Strange(kalvin)\n\nStrange(thacher)\n\nStrange(thacher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Delora is jellied. Delora is laborious. Delora is strenuous. Delora is unerasable. Hedvig is jellied. Hedvig is geared. Hedvig is curving. Hedvig is unerasable. Sax is geared. Torie is laborious. Nice things are geared. Cold things are laborious. If Sax is curving then Sax is strenuous. If something is jellied and curving then it is squint. Smart, strenuous things are curving. If Hedvig is squint and Hedvig is geared then Hedvig is unerasable. Torie is not jellied.", "logic": "\nJellied(delora)\nLaborious(delora)\nStrenuous(delora)\nUnerasable(delora)\nJellied(hedvig)\nGeared(hedvig)\nCurving(hedvig)\nUnerasable(hedvig)\nGeared(sax)\nLaborious(torie)\nforall x (Squint(x) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Laborious(x))\nCurving(sax) -> Strenuous(sax)\nforall x (Jellied(x) and Curving(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Unerasable(x) and Strenuous(x) -> Curving(x))\nSquint(hedvig) and Geared(hedvig) -> Unerasable(hedvig)\n\nnot Jellied(torie)\n\nnot Jellied(torie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Kristina is genovese. Kristina is acritical. Kristina is menstrual. Kristina is versed. Wojciech is genovese. Wojciech is apomictic. Wojciech is trendy. Wojciech is versed. Devan is apomictic. Chadwick is acritical. Nice things are apomictic. Cold things are acritical. If Devan is trendy then Devan is menstrual. If something is genovese and trendy then it is retrousse. Smart, menstrual things are trendy. If Wojciech is retrousse and Wojciech is apomictic then Wojciech is versed. Devan is versed.", "logic": "\nGenovese(kristina)\nAcritical(kristina)\nMenstrual(kristina)\nVersed(kristina)\nGenovese(wojciech)\nApomictic(wojciech)\nTrendy(wojciech)\nVersed(wojciech)\nApomictic(devan)\nAcritical(chadwick)\nforall x (Retrousse(x) -> Apomictic(x))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) -> Acritical(x))\nTrendy(devan) -> Menstrual(devan)\nforall x (Genovese(x) and Trendy(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Versed(x) and Menstrual(x) -> Trendy(x))\nRetrousse(wojciech) and Apomictic(wojciech) -> Versed(wojciech)\n\nVersed(devan)\n\nVersed(devan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "The nicki is comic. The nicki is stagey. The nicki bollocks the valenka. The nicki pass the valenka. The nicki vouchsafe the valenka. The valenka is fleet. The valenka is transonic. The valenka bollocks the nicki. The valenka pass the nicki. The valenka vouchsafe the nicki. If something bollocks the nicki and it pass the valenka then the valenka bollocks the nicki. If something is advanced and it bollocks the nicki then the nicki is transonic. If something bollocks the valenka then it is advanced. If something vouchsafe the nicki then it pass the valenka. All transonic things are advanced. If something bollocks the valenka and it is transonic then the valenka is comic. The nicki is comic.", "logic": "\nComic(nicki)\nStagey(nicki)\nBollocks(nicki, valenka)\nPass(nicki, valenka)\nVouchsafe(nicki, valenka)\nFleet(valenka)\nTransonic(valenka)\nBollocks(valenka, nicki)\nPass(valenka, nicki)\nVouchsafe(valenka, nicki)\nforall x (Bollocks(x, nicki) and Pass(x, valenka) -> Bollocks(valenka, nicki))\nforall x (Advanced(x) and Bollocks(x, nicki) -> Transonic(nicki))\nforall x (Bollocks(x, valenka) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Vouchsafe(x, nicki) -> Pass(x, valenka))\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Bollocks(x, valenka) and Transonic(x) -> Comic(valenka))\n\nComic(nicki)\n\ntherefore Comic(nicki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The ravil is ribbonlike. The ravil is littler. The ravil spree the simonette. The ravil conn the simonette. The ravil cachinnate the simonette. The simonette is motiveless. The simonette is overgrown. The simonette spree the ravil. The simonette conn the ravil. The simonette cachinnate the ravil. If something spree the ravil and it conn the simonette then the simonette spree the ravil. If something is succinic and it spree the ravil then the ravil is overgrown. If something spree the simonette then it is succinic. If something cachinnate the ravil then it conn the simonette. All overgrown things are succinic. If something spree the simonette and it is overgrown then the simonette is ribbonlike. The ravil does not need the simonette.", "logic": "\nRibbonlike(ravil)\nLittler(ravil)\nSpree(ravil, simonette)\nConn(ravil, simonette)\nCachinnate(ravil, simonette)\nMotiveless(simonette)\nOvergrown(simonette)\nSpree(simonette, ravil)\nConn(simonette, ravil)\nCachinnate(simonette, ravil)\nforall x (Spree(x, ravil) and Conn(x, simonette) -> Spree(simonette, ravil))\nforall x (Succinic(x) and Spree(x, ravil) -> Overgrown(ravil))\nforall x (Spree(x, simonette) -> Succinic(x))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, ravil) -> Conn(x, simonette))\nforall x (Overgrown(x) -> Succinic(x))\nforall x (Spree(x, simonette) and Overgrown(x) -> Ribbonlike(simonette))\n\nnot Conn(ravil, simonette)\n\ntherefore Conn(ravil, simonette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The titos is napoleonic. The titos is showery. The titos jangle the bebe. The titos impinge the bebe. The titos schedule the bebe. The bebe is epizoic. The bebe is monovular. The bebe jangle the titos. The bebe impinge the titos. The bebe schedule the titos. If something jangle the titos and it impinge the bebe then the bebe jangle the titos. If something is shameless and it jangle the titos then the titos is monovular. If something jangle the bebe then it is shameless. If something schedule the titos then it impinge the bebe. All monovular things are shameless. If something jangle the bebe and it is monovular then the bebe is napoleonic. The bebe is shameless.", "logic": "\nNapoleonic(titos)\nShowery(titos)\nJangle(titos, bebe)\nImpinge(titos, bebe)\nSchedule(titos, bebe)\nEpizoic(bebe)\nMonovular(bebe)\nJangle(bebe, titos)\nImpinge(bebe, titos)\nSchedule(bebe, titos)\nforall x (Jangle(x, titos) and Impinge(x, bebe) -> Jangle(bebe, titos))\nforall x (Shameless(x) and Jangle(x, titos) -> Monovular(titos))\nforall x (Jangle(x, bebe) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Schedule(x, titos) -> Impinge(x, bebe))\nforall x (Monovular(x) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Jangle(x, bebe) and Monovular(x) -> Napoleonic(bebe))\n\nShameless(bebe)\n\nMonovular(bebe) and forall x (Monovular(x) -> Shameless(x)) -> therefore Shameless(bebe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The mollie is lopsided. The mollie is cellulosid. The mollie bully the hendrick. The mollie reposit the hendrick. The mollie handcolour the hendrick. The hendrick is laureate. The hendrick is prostrate. The hendrick bully the mollie. The hendrick reposit the mollie. The hendrick handcolour the mollie. If something bully the mollie and it reposit the hendrick then the hendrick bully the mollie. If something is diazo and it bully the mollie then the mollie is prostrate. If something bully the hendrick then it is diazo. If something handcolour the mollie then it reposit the hendrick. All prostrate things are diazo. If something bully the hendrick and it is prostrate then the hendrick is lopsided. The hendrick is not diazo.", "logic": "\nLopsided(mollie)\nCellulosid(mollie)\nBully(mollie, hendrick)\nReposit(mollie, hendrick)\nHandcolour(mollie, hendrick)\nLaureate(hendrick)\nProstrate(hendrick)\nBully(hendrick, mollie)\nReposit(hendrick, mollie)\nHandcolour(hendrick, mollie)\nforall x (Bully(x, mollie) and Reposit(x, hendrick) -> Bully(hendrick, mollie))\nforall x (Diazo(x) and Bully(x, mollie) -> Prostrate(mollie))\nforall x (Bully(x, hendrick) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Handcolour(x, mollie) -> Reposit(x, hendrick))\nforall x (Prostrate(x) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Bully(x, hendrick) and Prostrate(x) -> Lopsided(hendrick))\n\nnot Diazo(hendrick)\n\nProstrate(hendrick) and forall x (Prostrate(x) -> Diazo(x)) -> therefore Diazo(hendrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The kent is meagerly. The kent is skinless. The kent clunk the zedekiah. The kent rubberneck the zedekiah. The kent flummox the zedekiah. The zedekiah is redolent. The zedekiah is partizan. The zedekiah clunk the kent. The zedekiah rubberneck the kent. The zedekiah flummox the kent. If something clunk the kent and it rubberneck the zedekiah then the zedekiah clunk the kent. If something is imperfect and it clunk the kent then the kent is partizan. If something clunk the zedekiah then it is imperfect. If something flummox the kent then it rubberneck the zedekiah. All partizan things are imperfect. If something clunk the zedekiah and it is partizan then the zedekiah is meagerly. The kent is partizan.", "logic": "\nMeagerly(kent)\nSkinless(kent)\nClunk(kent, zedekiah)\nRubberneck(kent, zedekiah)\nFlummox(kent, zedekiah)\nRedolent(zedekiah)\nPartizan(zedekiah)\nClunk(zedekiah, kent)\nRubberneck(zedekiah, kent)\nFlummox(zedekiah, kent)\nforall x (Clunk(x, kent) and Rubberneck(x, zedekiah) -> Clunk(zedekiah, kent))\nforall x (Imperfect(x) and Clunk(x, kent) -> Partizan(kent))\nforall x (Clunk(x, zedekiah) -> Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Flummox(x, kent) -> Rubberneck(x, zedekiah))\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Clunk(x, zedekiah) and Partizan(x) -> Meagerly(zedekiah))\n\nPartizan(kent)\n\nPartizan(zedekiah) and forall x (Partizan(x) -> Imperfect(x)) -> therefore Imperfect(zedekiah) Imperfect(zedekiah) and Clunk(zedekiah, kent) and forall x (Imperfect(x) and Clunk(x, kent) -> Partizan(kent)) -> therefore Partizan(kent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The jorrie is captious. The jorrie is enraptured. The jorrie daub the gavra. The jorrie distance the gavra. The jorrie flood the gavra. The gavra is doting. The gavra is scholastic. The gavra daub the jorrie. The gavra distance the jorrie. The gavra flood the jorrie. If something daub the jorrie and it distance the gavra then the gavra daub the jorrie. If something is aided and it daub the jorrie then the jorrie is scholastic. If something daub the gavra then it is aided. If something flood the jorrie then it distance the gavra. All scholastic things are aided. If something daub the gavra and it is scholastic then the gavra is captious. The jorrie is not scholastic.", "logic": "\nCaptious(jorrie)\nEnraptured(jorrie)\nDaub(jorrie, gavra)\nDistance(jorrie, gavra)\nFlood(jorrie, gavra)\nDoting(gavra)\nScholastic(gavra)\nDaub(gavra, jorrie)\nDistance(gavra, jorrie)\nFlood(gavra, jorrie)\nforall x (Daub(x, jorrie) and Distance(x, gavra) -> Daub(gavra, jorrie))\nforall x (Aided(x) and Daub(x, jorrie) -> Scholastic(jorrie))\nforall x (Daub(x, gavra) -> Aided(x))\nforall x (Flood(x, jorrie) -> Distance(x, gavra))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Aided(x))\nforall x (Daub(x, gavra) and Scholastic(x) -> Captious(gavra))\n\nnot Scholastic(jorrie)\n\nScholastic(gavra) and forall x (Scholastic(x) -> Aided(x)) -> therefore Aided(gavra) Aided(gavra) and Daub(gavra, jorrie) and forall x (Aided(x) and Daub(x, jorrie) -> Scholastic(jorrie)) -> therefore Scholastic(jorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The pippy is summary. The pippy is palatial. The pippy escalade the idell. The pippy ventilate the idell. The pippy lobby the idell. The idell is grumous. The idell is unsold. The idell escalade the pippy. The idell ventilate the pippy. The idell lobby the pippy. If something escalade the pippy and it ventilate the idell then the idell escalade the pippy. If something is quebecois and it escalade the pippy then the pippy is unsold. If something escalade the idell then it is quebecois. If something lobby the pippy then it ventilate the idell. All unsold things are quebecois. If something escalade the idell and it is unsold then the idell is summary. The idell is summary.", "logic": "\nSummary(pippy)\nPalatial(pippy)\nEscalade(pippy, idell)\nVentilate(pippy, idell)\nLobby(pippy, idell)\nGrumous(idell)\nUnsold(idell)\nEscalade(idell, pippy)\nVentilate(idell, pippy)\nLobby(idell, pippy)\nforall x (Escalade(x, pippy) and Ventilate(x, idell) -> Escalade(idell, pippy))\nforall x (Quebecois(x) and Escalade(x, pippy) -> Unsold(pippy))\nforall x (Escalade(x, idell) -> Quebecois(x))\nforall x (Lobby(x, pippy) -> Ventilate(x, idell))\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Quebecois(x))\nforall x (Escalade(x, idell) and Unsold(x) -> Summary(idell))\n\nSummary(idell)\n\nUnsold(idell) and forall x (Unsold(x) -> Quebecois(x)) -> therefore Quebecois(idell) Quebecois(idell) and Escalade(idell, pippy) and forall x (Quebecois(x) and Escalade(x, pippy) -> Unsold(pippy)) -> therefore Unsold(pippy) Escalade(pippy, idell) and Unsold(pippy) and forall x (Escalade(x, idell) and Unsold(x) -> Summary(idell)) -> therefore Summary(idell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The natalya is vesicant. The natalya is shoed. The natalya bully the evan. The natalya taper the evan. The natalya flurry the evan. The evan is toed. The evan is undyed. The evan bully the natalya. The evan taper the natalya. The evan flurry the natalya. If something bully the natalya and it taper the evan then the evan bully the natalya. If something is anaglyphic and it bully the natalya then the natalya is undyed. If something bully the evan then it is anaglyphic. If something flurry the natalya then it taper the evan. All undyed things are anaglyphic. If something bully the evan and it is undyed then the evan is vesicant. The evan is not vesicant.", "logic": "\nVesicant(natalya)\nShoed(natalya)\nBully(natalya, evan)\nTaper(natalya, evan)\nFlurry(natalya, evan)\nToed(evan)\nUndyed(evan)\nBully(evan, natalya)\nTaper(evan, natalya)\nFlurry(evan, natalya)\nforall x (Bully(x, natalya) and Taper(x, evan) -> Bully(evan, natalya))\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) and Bully(x, natalya) -> Undyed(natalya))\nforall x (Bully(x, evan) -> Anaglyphic(x))\nforall x (Flurry(x, natalya) -> Taper(x, evan))\nforall x (Undyed(x) -> Anaglyphic(x))\nforall x (Bully(x, evan) and Undyed(x) -> Vesicant(evan))\n\nnot Vesicant(evan)\n\nUndyed(evan) and forall x (Undyed(x) -> Anaglyphic(x)) -> therefore Anaglyphic(evan) Anaglyphic(evan) and Bully(evan, natalya) and forall x (Anaglyphic(x) and Bully(x, natalya) -> Undyed(natalya)) -> therefore Undyed(natalya) Bully(natalya, evan) and Undyed(natalya) and forall x (Bully(x, evan) and Undyed(x) -> Vesicant(evan)) -> therefore Vesicant(evan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The cameron is optative. The cameron is ossiferous. The cameron elbow the annabell. The cameron obnubilate the annabell. The cameron clutch the annabell. The annabell is vindicated. The annabell is wiccan. The annabell elbow the cameron. The annabell obnubilate the cameron. The annabell clutch the cameron. If something elbow the cameron and it obnubilate the annabell then the annabell elbow the cameron. If something is mossy and it elbow the cameron then the cameron is wiccan. If something elbow the annabell then it is mossy. If something clutch the cameron then it obnubilate the annabell. All wiccan things are mossy. If something elbow the annabell and it is wiccan then the annabell is optative. The annabell does not see the annabell.", "logic": "\nOptative(cameron)\nOssiferous(cameron)\nElbow(cameron, annabell)\nObnubilate(cameron, annabell)\nClutch(cameron, annabell)\nVindicated(annabell)\nWiccan(annabell)\nElbow(annabell, cameron)\nObnubilate(annabell, cameron)\nClutch(annabell, cameron)\nforall x (Elbow(x, cameron) and Obnubilate(x, annabell) -> Elbow(annabell, cameron))\nforall x (Mossy(x) and Elbow(x, cameron) -> Wiccan(cameron))\nforall x (Elbow(x, annabell) -> Mossy(x))\nforall x (Clutch(x, cameron) -> Obnubilate(x, annabell))\nforall x (Wiccan(x) -> Mossy(x))\nforall x (Elbow(x, annabell) and Wiccan(x) -> Optative(annabell))\n\nnot Clutch(annabell, annabell)\n\nnot Clutch(annabell, annabell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The tully is unfunded. The tully is brumal. The tully mastermind the pansie. The tully resent the pansie. The tully argue the pansie. The pansie is thieving. The pansie is bathyal. The pansie mastermind the tully. The pansie resent the tully. The pansie argue the tully. If something mastermind the tully and it resent the pansie then the pansie mastermind the tully. If something is isentropic and it mastermind the tully then the tully is bathyal. If something mastermind the pansie then it is isentropic. If something argue the tully then it resent the pansie. All bathyal things are isentropic. If something mastermind the pansie and it is bathyal then the pansie is unfunded. The tully resent the tully.", "logic": "\nUnfunded(tully)\nBrumal(tully)\nMastermind(tully, pansie)\nResent(tully, pansie)\nArgue(tully, pansie)\nThieving(pansie)\nBathyal(pansie)\nMastermind(pansie, tully)\nResent(pansie, tully)\nArgue(pansie, tully)\nforall x (Mastermind(x, tully) and Resent(x, pansie) -> Mastermind(pansie, tully))\nforall x (Isentropic(x) and Mastermind(x, tully) -> Bathyal(tully))\nforall x (Mastermind(x, pansie) -> Isentropic(x))\nforall x (Argue(x, tully) -> Resent(x, pansie))\nforall x (Bathyal(x) -> Isentropic(x))\nforall x (Mastermind(x, pansie) and Bathyal(x) -> Unfunded(pansie))\n\nResent(tully, tully)\n\nResent(tully, tully) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The anabel is mucinous. The anabel is successful. The anabel peruse the patty. The anabel riposte the patty. The anabel paper the patty. The patty is epic. The patty is promissory. The patty peruse the anabel. The patty riposte the anabel. The patty paper the anabel. If something peruse the anabel and it riposte the patty then the patty peruse the anabel. If something is oxidative and it peruse the anabel then the anabel is promissory. If something peruse the patty then it is oxidative. If something paper the anabel then it riposte the patty. All promissory things are oxidative. If something peruse the patty and it is promissory then the patty is mucinous. The anabel does not see the anabel.", "logic": "\nMucinous(anabel)\nSuccessful(anabel)\nPeruse(anabel, patty)\nRiposte(anabel, patty)\nPaper(anabel, patty)\nEpic(patty)\nPromissory(patty)\nPeruse(patty, anabel)\nRiposte(patty, anabel)\nPaper(patty, anabel)\nforall x (Peruse(x, anabel) and Riposte(x, patty) -> Peruse(patty, anabel))\nforall x (Oxidative(x) and Peruse(x, anabel) -> Promissory(anabel))\nforall x (Peruse(x, patty) -> Oxidative(x))\nforall x (Paper(x, anabel) -> Riposte(x, patty))\nforall x (Promissory(x) -> Oxidative(x))\nforall x (Peruse(x, patty) and Promissory(x) -> Mucinous(patty))\n\nnot Paper(anabel, anabel)\n\nnot Paper(anabel, anabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The cassondra is batholitic. The cassondra is unmapped. The cassondra convect the sanderson. The cassondra realize the sanderson. The cassondra tarnish the sanderson. The sanderson is suctorial. The sanderson is incisive. The sanderson convect the cassondra. The sanderson realize the cassondra. The sanderson tarnish the cassondra. If something convect the cassondra and it realize the sanderson then the sanderson convect the cassondra. If something is bitty and it convect the cassondra then the cassondra is incisive. If something convect the sanderson then it is bitty. If something tarnish the cassondra then it realize the sanderson. All incisive things are bitty. If something convect the sanderson and it is incisive then the sanderson is batholitic. The sanderson convect the sanderson.", "logic": "\nBatholitic(cassondra)\nUnmapped(cassondra)\nConvect(cassondra, sanderson)\nRealize(cassondra, sanderson)\nTarnish(cassondra, sanderson)\nSuctorial(sanderson)\nIncisive(sanderson)\nConvect(sanderson, cassondra)\nRealize(sanderson, cassondra)\nTarnish(sanderson, cassondra)\nforall x (Convect(x, cassondra) and Realize(x, sanderson) -> Convect(sanderson, cassondra))\nforall x (Bitty(x) and Convect(x, cassondra) -> Incisive(cassondra))\nforall x (Convect(x, sanderson) -> Bitty(x))\nforall x (Tarnish(x, cassondra) -> Realize(x, sanderson))\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Bitty(x))\nforall x (Convect(x, sanderson) and Incisive(x) -> Batholitic(sanderson))\n\nConvect(sanderson, sanderson)\n\nConvect(sanderson, sanderson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The rodrick is unloving. The rodrick is smelly. The rodrick chastise the mufi. The rodrick blotch the mufi. The rodrick complete the mufi. The mufi is analogical. The mufi is factitious. The mufi chastise the rodrick. The mufi blotch the rodrick. The mufi complete the rodrick. If something chastise the rodrick and it blotch the mufi then the mufi chastise the rodrick. If something is perforate and it chastise the rodrick then the rodrick is factitious. If something chastise the mufi then it is perforate. If something complete the rodrick then it blotch the mufi. All factitious things are perforate. If something chastise the mufi and it is factitious then the mufi is unloving. The mufi is not smelly.", "logic": "\nUnloving(rodrick)\nSmelly(rodrick)\nChastise(rodrick, mufi)\nBlotch(rodrick, mufi)\nComplete(rodrick, mufi)\nAnalogical(mufi)\nFactitious(mufi)\nChastise(mufi, rodrick)\nBlotch(mufi, rodrick)\nComplete(mufi, rodrick)\nforall x (Chastise(x, rodrick) and Blotch(x, mufi) -> Chastise(mufi, rodrick))\nforall x (Perforate(x) and Chastise(x, rodrick) -> Factitious(rodrick))\nforall x (Chastise(x, mufi) -> Perforate(x))\nforall x (Complete(x, rodrick) -> Blotch(x, mufi))\nforall x (Factitious(x) -> Perforate(x))\nforall x (Chastise(x, mufi) and Factitious(x) -> Unloving(mufi))\n\nnot Smelly(mufi)\n\nnot Smelly(mufi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The steffen is swaggering. The steffen is underhung. The steffen complexion the nalani. The steffen emasculate the nalani. The steffen profiteer the nalani. The nalani is unrigged. The nalani is plenary. The nalani complexion the steffen. The nalani emasculate the steffen. The nalani profiteer the steffen. If something complexion the steffen and it emasculate the nalani then the nalani complexion the steffen. If something is textile and it complexion the steffen then the steffen is plenary. If something complexion the nalani then it is textile. If something profiteer the steffen then it emasculate the nalani. All plenary things are textile. If something complexion the nalani and it is plenary then the nalani is swaggering. The steffen complexion the steffen.", "logic": "\nSwaggering(steffen)\nUnderhung(steffen)\nComplexion(steffen, nalani)\nEmasculate(steffen, nalani)\nProfiteer(steffen, nalani)\nUnrigged(nalani)\nPlenary(nalani)\nComplexion(nalani, steffen)\nEmasculate(nalani, steffen)\nProfiteer(nalani, steffen)\nforall x (Complexion(x, steffen) and Emasculate(x, nalani) -> Complexion(nalani, steffen))\nforall x (Textile(x) and Complexion(x, steffen) -> Plenary(steffen))\nforall x (Complexion(x, nalani) -> Textile(x))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, steffen) -> Emasculate(x, nalani))\nforall x (Plenary(x) -> Textile(x))\nforall x (Complexion(x, nalani) and Plenary(x) -> Swaggering(nalani))\n\nComplexion(steffen, steffen)\n\nComplexion(steffen, steffen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The sybila is listed. The sybila blindfold the carter. The sybila chandelle the carter. The carter is toadyish. The carter blindfold the elton. The carter chandelle the sybila. The elton does not chase the sybila. The elton backtrack the carter. The elton is lotic. The elton blindfold the sybila. The elton does not visit the sybila. The elton chandelle the carter. If something is lotic and it chandelle the carter then it is listed. If something blindfold the elton then it does not chase the elton. If something is lotic and toadyish then it backtrack the elton. If the carter is attentive then the carter is not listed. If something blindfold the sybila and it is listed then it blindfold the elton. If something backtrack the carter then it blindfold the carter. If something backtrack the elton then the elton is dietary. If something blindfold the sybila and the sybila blindfold the carter then the carter is dietary. The elton is lotic.", "logic": "\nListed(sybila)\nBlindfold(sybila, carter)\nChandelle(sybila, carter)\nToadyish(carter)\nBlindfold(carter, elton)\nChandelle(carter, sybila)\nnot Backtrack(elton, sybila)\nBacktrack(elton, carter)\nLotic(elton)\nBlindfold(elton, sybila)\nnot Chandelle(elton, sybila)\nChandelle(elton, carter)\nforall x (Lotic(x) and Chandelle(x, carter) -> Listed(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x, elton) -> not Backtrack(x, elton))\nforall x (Lotic(x) and Toadyish(x) -> Backtrack(x, elton))\nAttentive(carter) -> not Listed(carter)\nforall x (Blindfold(x, sybila) and Listed(x) -> Blindfold(x, elton))\nforall x (Backtrack(x, carter) -> Blindfold(x, carter))\nforall x (Backtrack(x, elton) -> Dietary(elton))\nforall x (Blindfold(x, sybila) and Blindfold(sybila, carter) -> Dietary(carter))\n\nLotic(elton)\n\ntherefore Lotic(elton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The hamid is simian. The hamid grovel the thekla. The hamid render the thekla. The thekla is carven. The thekla grovel the angeline. The thekla render the hamid. The angeline does not chase the hamid. The angeline suckle the thekla. The angeline is hellish. The angeline grovel the hamid. The angeline does not visit the hamid. The angeline render the thekla. If something is hellish and it render the thekla then it is simian. If something grovel the angeline then it does not chase the angeline. If something is hellish and carven then it suckle the angeline. If the thekla is anecdotal then the thekla is not simian. If something grovel the hamid and it is simian then it grovel the angeline. If something suckle the thekla then it grovel the thekla. If something suckle the angeline then the angeline is bionic. If something grovel the hamid and the hamid grovel the thekla then the thekla is bionic. The angeline is not hellish.", "logic": "\nSimian(hamid)\nGrovel(hamid, thekla)\nRender(hamid, thekla)\nCarven(thekla)\nGrovel(thekla, angeline)\nRender(thekla, hamid)\nnot Suckle(angeline, hamid)\nSuckle(angeline, thekla)\nHellish(angeline)\nGrovel(angeline, hamid)\nnot Render(angeline, hamid)\nRender(angeline, thekla)\nforall x (Hellish(x) and Render(x, thekla) -> Simian(x))\nforall x (Grovel(x, angeline) -> not Suckle(x, angeline))\nforall x (Hellish(x) and Carven(x) -> Suckle(x, angeline))\nAnecdotal(thekla) -> not Simian(thekla)\nforall x (Grovel(x, hamid) and Simian(x) -> Grovel(x, angeline))\nforall x (Suckle(x, thekla) -> Grovel(x, thekla))\nforall x (Suckle(x, angeline) -> Bionic(angeline))\nforall x (Grovel(x, hamid) and Grovel(hamid, thekla) -> Bionic(thekla))\n\nnot Hellish(angeline)\n\ntherefore Hellish(angeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The jesselyn is unlicenced. The jesselyn vesicate the xenos. The jesselyn bleat the xenos. The xenos is cagey. The xenos vesicate the lani. The xenos bleat the jesselyn. The lani does not chase the jesselyn. The lani fundraise the xenos. The lani is endocrine. The lani vesicate the jesselyn. The lani does not visit the jesselyn. The lani bleat the xenos. If something is endocrine and it bleat the xenos then it is unlicenced. If something vesicate the lani then it does not chase the lani. If something is endocrine and cagey then it fundraise the lani. If the xenos is unmodified then the xenos is not unlicenced. If something vesicate the jesselyn and it is unlicenced then it vesicate the lani. If something fundraise the xenos then it vesicate the xenos. If something fundraise the lani then the lani is aural. If something vesicate the jesselyn and the jesselyn vesicate the xenos then the xenos is aural. The xenos is aural.", "logic": "\nUnlicenced(jesselyn)\nVesicate(jesselyn, xenos)\nBleat(jesselyn, xenos)\nCagey(xenos)\nVesicate(xenos, lani)\nBleat(xenos, jesselyn)\nnot Fundraise(lani, jesselyn)\nFundraise(lani, xenos)\nEndocrine(lani)\nVesicate(lani, jesselyn)\nnot Bleat(lani, jesselyn)\nBleat(lani, xenos)\nforall x (Endocrine(x) and Bleat(x, xenos) -> Unlicenced(x))\nforall x (Vesicate(x, lani) -> not Fundraise(x, lani))\nforall x (Endocrine(x) and Cagey(x) -> Fundraise(x, lani))\nUnmodified(xenos) -> not Unlicenced(xenos)\nforall x (Vesicate(x, jesselyn) and Unlicenced(x) -> Vesicate(x, lani))\nforall x (Fundraise(x, xenos) -> Vesicate(x, xenos))\nforall x (Fundraise(x, lani) -> Aural(lani))\nforall x (Vesicate(x, jesselyn) and Vesicate(jesselyn, xenos) -> Aural(xenos))\n\nAural(xenos)\n\nVesicate(lani, jesselyn) and Vesicate(jesselyn, xenos) and forall x (Vesicate(x, jesselyn) and Vesicate(jesselyn, xenos) -> Aural(xenos)) -> therefore Aural(xenos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The zahara is requisite. The zahara demoralise the ophelia. The zahara soil the ophelia. The ophelia is grating. The ophelia demoralise the rolfe. The ophelia soil the zahara. The rolfe does not chase the zahara. The rolfe proof the ophelia. The rolfe is blistery. The rolfe demoralise the zahara. The rolfe does not visit the zahara. The rolfe soil the ophelia. If something is blistery and it soil the ophelia then it is requisite. If something demoralise the rolfe then it does not chase the rolfe. If something is blistery and grating then it proof the rolfe. If the ophelia is alternate then the ophelia is not requisite. If something demoralise the zahara and it is requisite then it demoralise the rolfe. If something proof the ophelia then it demoralise the ophelia. If something proof the rolfe then the rolfe is stupefied. If something demoralise the zahara and the zahara demoralise the ophelia then the ophelia is stupefied. The ophelia is not stupefied.", "logic": "\nRequisite(zahara)\nDemoralise(zahara, ophelia)\nSoil(zahara, ophelia)\nGrating(ophelia)\nDemoralise(ophelia, rolfe)\nSoil(ophelia, zahara)\nnot Proof(rolfe, zahara)\nProof(rolfe, ophelia)\nBlistery(rolfe)\nDemoralise(rolfe, zahara)\nnot Soil(rolfe, zahara)\nSoil(rolfe, ophelia)\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Soil(x, ophelia) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Demoralise(x, rolfe) -> not Proof(x, rolfe))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Grating(x) -> Proof(x, rolfe))\nAlternate(ophelia) -> not Requisite(ophelia)\nforall x (Demoralise(x, zahara) and Requisite(x) -> Demoralise(x, rolfe))\nforall x (Proof(x, ophelia) -> Demoralise(x, ophelia))\nforall x (Proof(x, rolfe) -> Stupefied(rolfe))\nforall x (Demoralise(x, zahara) and Demoralise(zahara, ophelia) -> Stupefied(ophelia))\n\nnot Stupefied(ophelia)\n\nDemoralise(rolfe, zahara) and Demoralise(zahara, ophelia) and forall x (Demoralise(x, zahara) and Demoralise(zahara, ophelia) -> Stupefied(ophelia)) -> therefore Stupefied(ophelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The jami is first. The jami bumble the sheridan. The jami cure the sheridan. The sheridan is viii. The sheridan bumble the saunder. The sheridan cure the jami. The saunder does not chase the jami. The saunder marble the sheridan. The saunder is leathery. The saunder bumble the jami. The saunder does not visit the jami. The saunder cure the sheridan. If something is leathery and it cure the sheridan then it is first. If something bumble the saunder then it does not chase the saunder. If something is leathery and viii then it marble the saunder. If the sheridan is muddled then the sheridan is not first. If something bumble the jami and it is first then it bumble the saunder. If something marble the sheridan then it bumble the sheridan. If something marble the saunder then the saunder is wanting. If something bumble the jami and the jami bumble the sheridan then the sheridan is wanting. The saunder bumble the saunder.", "logic": "\nFirst(jami)\nBumble(jami, sheridan)\nCure(jami, sheridan)\nViii(sheridan)\nBumble(sheridan, saunder)\nCure(sheridan, jami)\nnot Marble(saunder, jami)\nMarble(saunder, sheridan)\nLeathery(saunder)\nBumble(saunder, jami)\nnot Cure(saunder, jami)\nCure(saunder, sheridan)\nforall x (Leathery(x) and Cure(x, sheridan) -> First(x))\nforall x (Bumble(x, saunder) -> not Marble(x, saunder))\nforall x (Leathery(x) and Viii(x) -> Marble(x, saunder))\nMuddled(sheridan) -> not First(sheridan)\nforall x (Bumble(x, jami) and First(x) -> Bumble(x, saunder))\nforall x (Marble(x, sheridan) -> Bumble(x, sheridan))\nforall x (Marble(x, saunder) -> Wanting(saunder))\nforall x (Bumble(x, jami) and Bumble(jami, sheridan) -> Wanting(sheridan))\n\nBumble(saunder, saunder)\n\nLeathery(saunder) and Cure(saunder, sheridan) and forall x (Leathery(x) and Cure(x, sheridan) -> First(x)) -> therefore First(saunder) Bumble(saunder, jami) and First(saunder) and forall x (Bumble(x, jami) and First(x) -> Bumble(x, saunder)) -> therefore Bumble(saunder, saunder)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The terra is crummy. The terra earth the rina. The terra abscise the rina. The rina is copular. The rina earth the daryl. The rina abscise the terra. The daryl does not chase the terra. The daryl bluff the rina. The daryl is sexy. The daryl earth the terra. The daryl does not visit the terra. The daryl abscise the rina. If something is sexy and it abscise the rina then it is crummy. If something earth the daryl then it does not chase the daryl. If something is sexy and copular then it bluff the daryl. If the rina is unroofed then the rina is not crummy. If something earth the terra and it is crummy then it earth the daryl. If something bluff the rina then it earth the rina. If something bluff the daryl then the daryl is diclinous. If something earth the terra and the terra earth the rina then the rina is diclinous. The daryl does not like the daryl.", "logic": "\nCrummy(terra)\nEarth(terra, rina)\nAbscise(terra, rina)\nCopular(rina)\nEarth(rina, daryl)\nAbscise(rina, terra)\nnot Bluff(daryl, terra)\nBluff(daryl, rina)\nSexy(daryl)\nEarth(daryl, terra)\nnot Abscise(daryl, terra)\nAbscise(daryl, rina)\nforall x (Sexy(x) and Abscise(x, rina) -> Crummy(x))\nforall x (Earth(x, daryl) -> not Bluff(x, daryl))\nforall x (Sexy(x) and Copular(x) -> Bluff(x, daryl))\nUnroofed(rina) -> not Crummy(rina)\nforall x (Earth(x, terra) and Crummy(x) -> Earth(x, daryl))\nforall x (Bluff(x, rina) -> Earth(x, rina))\nforall x (Bluff(x, daryl) -> Diclinous(daryl))\nforall x (Earth(x, terra) and Earth(terra, rina) -> Diclinous(rina))\n\nnot Earth(daryl, daryl)\n\nSexy(daryl) and Abscise(daryl, rina) and forall x (Sexy(x) and Abscise(x, rina) -> Crummy(x)) -> therefore Crummy(daryl) Earth(daryl, terra) and Crummy(daryl) and forall x (Earth(x, terra) and Crummy(x) -> Earth(x, daryl)) -> therefore Earth(daryl, daryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The ambrose is advisory. The ambrose befriend the geoffry. The ambrose typeset the geoffry. The geoffry is unspaced. The geoffry befriend the shannah. The geoffry typeset the ambrose. The shannah does not chase the ambrose. The shannah brown the geoffry. The shannah is punishable. The shannah befriend the ambrose. The shannah does not visit the ambrose. The shannah typeset the geoffry. If something is punishable and it typeset the geoffry then it is advisory. If something befriend the shannah then it does not chase the shannah. If something is punishable and unspaced then it brown the shannah. If the geoffry is dipolar then the geoffry is not advisory. If something befriend the ambrose and it is advisory then it befriend the shannah. If something brown the geoffry then it befriend the geoffry. If something brown the shannah then the shannah is flatulent. If something befriend the ambrose and the ambrose befriend the geoffry then the geoffry is flatulent. The shannah does not chase the shannah.", "logic": "\nAdvisory(ambrose)\nBefriend(ambrose, geoffry)\nTypeset(ambrose, geoffry)\nUnspaced(geoffry)\nBefriend(geoffry, shannah)\nTypeset(geoffry, ambrose)\nnot Brown(shannah, ambrose)\nBrown(shannah, geoffry)\nPunishable(shannah)\nBefriend(shannah, ambrose)\nnot Typeset(shannah, ambrose)\nTypeset(shannah, geoffry)\nforall x (Punishable(x) and Typeset(x, geoffry) -> Advisory(x))\nforall x (Befriend(x, shannah) -> not Brown(x, shannah))\nforall x (Punishable(x) and Unspaced(x) -> Brown(x, shannah))\nDipolar(geoffry) -> not Advisory(geoffry)\nforall x (Befriend(x, ambrose) and Advisory(x) -> Befriend(x, shannah))\nforall x (Brown(x, geoffry) -> Befriend(x, geoffry))\nforall x (Brown(x, shannah) -> Flatulent(shannah))\nforall x (Befriend(x, ambrose) and Befriend(ambrose, geoffry) -> Flatulent(geoffry))\n\nnot Brown(shannah, shannah)\n\nPunishable(shannah) and Typeset(shannah, geoffry) and forall x (Punishable(x) and Typeset(x, geoffry) -> Advisory(x)) -> therefore Advisory(shannah) Befriend(shannah, ambrose) and Advisory(shannah) and forall x (Befriend(x, ambrose) and Advisory(x) -> Befriend(x, shannah)) -> therefore Befriend(shannah, shannah) Befriend(shannah, shannah) and forall x (Befriend(x, shannah) -> not Brown(x, shannah)) -> therefore not Brown(shannah, shannah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The elayne is cyclopean. The elayne vindicate the selig. The elayne filtrate the selig. The selig is divorced. The selig vindicate the consuelo. The selig filtrate the elayne. The consuelo does not chase the elayne. The consuelo eventuate the selig. The consuelo is awash. The consuelo vindicate the elayne. The consuelo does not visit the elayne. The consuelo filtrate the selig. If something is awash and it filtrate the selig then it is cyclopean. If something vindicate the consuelo then it does not chase the consuelo. If something is awash and divorced then it eventuate the consuelo. If the selig is noseless then the selig is not cyclopean. If something vindicate the elayne and it is cyclopean then it vindicate the consuelo. If something eventuate the selig then it vindicate the selig. If something eventuate the consuelo then the consuelo is multicolor. If something vindicate the elayne and the elayne vindicate the selig then the selig is multicolor. The consuelo eventuate the consuelo.", "logic": "\nCyclopean(elayne)\nVindicate(elayne, selig)\nFiltrate(elayne, selig)\nDivorced(selig)\nVindicate(selig, consuelo)\nFiltrate(selig, elayne)\nnot Eventuate(consuelo, elayne)\nEventuate(consuelo, selig)\nAwash(consuelo)\nVindicate(consuelo, elayne)\nnot Filtrate(consuelo, elayne)\nFiltrate(consuelo, selig)\nforall x (Awash(x) and Filtrate(x, selig) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, consuelo) -> not Eventuate(x, consuelo))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Divorced(x) -> Eventuate(x, consuelo))\nNoseless(selig) -> not Cyclopean(selig)\nforall x (Vindicate(x, elayne) and Cyclopean(x) -> Vindicate(x, consuelo))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, selig) -> Vindicate(x, selig))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, consuelo) -> Multicolor(consuelo))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, elayne) and Vindicate(elayne, selig) -> Multicolor(selig))\n\nEventuate(consuelo, consuelo)\n\nAwash(consuelo) and Filtrate(consuelo, selig) and forall x (Awash(x) and Filtrate(x, selig) -> Cyclopean(x)) -> therefore Cyclopean(consuelo) Vindicate(consuelo, elayne) and Cyclopean(consuelo) and forall x (Vindicate(x, elayne) and Cyclopean(x) -> Vindicate(x, consuelo)) -> therefore Vindicate(consuelo, consuelo) Vindicate(consuelo, consuelo) and forall x (Vindicate(x, consuelo) -> not Eventuate(x, consuelo)) -> therefore not Eventuate(consuelo, consuelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The micheil is sylvan. The micheil chloroform the frederick. The micheil medicate the frederick. The frederick is ergotropic. The frederick chloroform the voltaire. The frederick medicate the micheil. The voltaire does not chase the micheil. The voltaire clink the frederick. The voltaire is occurrent. The voltaire chloroform the micheil. The voltaire does not visit the micheil. The voltaire medicate the frederick. If something is occurrent and it medicate the frederick then it is sylvan. If something chloroform the voltaire then it does not chase the voltaire. If something is occurrent and ergotropic then it clink the voltaire. If the frederick is neurotoxic then the frederick is not sylvan. If something chloroform the micheil and it is sylvan then it chloroform the voltaire. If something clink the frederick then it chloroform the frederick. If something clink the voltaire then the voltaire is bhutanese. If something chloroform the micheil and the micheil chloroform the frederick then the frederick is bhutanese. The voltaire is not bhutanese.", "logic": "\nSylvan(micheil)\nChloroform(micheil, frederick)\nMedicate(micheil, frederick)\nErgotropic(frederick)\nChloroform(frederick, voltaire)\nMedicate(frederick, micheil)\nnot Clink(voltaire, micheil)\nClink(voltaire, frederick)\nOccurrent(voltaire)\nChloroform(voltaire, micheil)\nnot Medicate(voltaire, micheil)\nMedicate(voltaire, frederick)\nforall x (Occurrent(x) and Medicate(x, frederick) -> Sylvan(x))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, voltaire) -> not Clink(x, voltaire))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) and Ergotropic(x) -> Clink(x, voltaire))\nNeurotoxic(frederick) -> not Sylvan(frederick)\nforall x (Chloroform(x, micheil) and Sylvan(x) -> Chloroform(x, voltaire))\nforall x (Clink(x, frederick) -> Chloroform(x, frederick))\nforall x (Clink(x, voltaire) -> Bhutanese(voltaire))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, micheil) and Chloroform(micheil, frederick) -> Bhutanese(frederick))\n\nnot Bhutanese(voltaire)\n\nforall x (Clink(x, voltaire) -> Bhutanese(voltaire)) <- forall x (Occurrent(x) and Ergotropic(x) -> Clink(x, voltaire)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The estelle is unending. The estelle urbanize the sabina. The estelle curtail the sabina. The sabina is sibilant. The sabina urbanize the zebulon. The sabina curtail the estelle. The zebulon does not chase the estelle. The zebulon totter the sabina. The zebulon is shelled. The zebulon urbanize the estelle. The zebulon does not visit the estelle. The zebulon curtail the sabina. If something is shelled and it curtail the sabina then it is unending. If something urbanize the zebulon then it does not chase the zebulon. If something is shelled and sibilant then it totter the zebulon. If the sabina is chimeral then the sabina is not unending. If something urbanize the estelle and it is unending then it urbanize the zebulon. If something totter the sabina then it urbanize the sabina. If something totter the zebulon then the zebulon is sizzling. If something urbanize the estelle and the estelle urbanize the sabina then the sabina is sizzling. The estelle urbanize the zebulon.", "logic": "\nUnending(estelle)\nUrbanize(estelle, sabina)\nCurtail(estelle, sabina)\nSibilant(sabina)\nUrbanize(sabina, zebulon)\nCurtail(sabina, estelle)\nnot Totter(zebulon, estelle)\nTotter(zebulon, sabina)\nShelled(zebulon)\nUrbanize(zebulon, estelle)\nnot Curtail(zebulon, estelle)\nCurtail(zebulon, sabina)\nforall x (Shelled(x) and Curtail(x, sabina) -> Unending(x))\nforall x (Urbanize(x, zebulon) -> not Totter(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Shelled(x) and Sibilant(x) -> Totter(x, zebulon))\nChimeral(sabina) -> not Unending(sabina)\nforall x (Urbanize(x, estelle) and Unending(x) -> Urbanize(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Totter(x, sabina) -> Urbanize(x, sabina))\nforall x (Totter(x, zebulon) -> Sizzling(zebulon))\nforall x (Urbanize(x, estelle) and Urbanize(estelle, sabina) -> Sizzling(sabina))\n\nUrbanize(estelle, zebulon)\n\nforall x (Urbanize(x, estelle) and Unending(x) -> Urbanize(x, zebulon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The derrin is trabeate. The derrin acetylize the aron. The derrin bromate the aron. The aron is sidelong. The aron acetylize the seamus. The aron bromate the derrin. The seamus does not chase the derrin. The seamus rename the aron. The seamus is unneeded. The seamus acetylize the derrin. The seamus does not visit the derrin. The seamus bromate the aron. If something is unneeded and it bromate the aron then it is trabeate. If something acetylize the seamus then it does not chase the seamus. If something is unneeded and sidelong then it rename the seamus. If the aron is cartesian then the aron is not trabeate. If something acetylize the derrin and it is trabeate then it acetylize the seamus. If something rename the aron then it acetylize the aron. If something rename the seamus then the seamus is handleless. If something acetylize the derrin and the derrin acetylize the aron then the aron is handleless. The aron is not trabeate.", "logic": "\nTrabeate(derrin)\nAcetylize(derrin, aron)\nBromate(derrin, aron)\nSidelong(aron)\nAcetylize(aron, seamus)\nBromate(aron, derrin)\nnot Rename(seamus, derrin)\nRename(seamus, aron)\nUnneeded(seamus)\nAcetylize(seamus, derrin)\nnot Bromate(seamus, derrin)\nBromate(seamus, aron)\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and Bromate(x, aron) -> Trabeate(x))\nforall x (Acetylize(x, seamus) -> not Rename(x, seamus))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and Sidelong(x) -> Rename(x, seamus))\nCartesian(aron) -> not Trabeate(aron)\nforall x (Acetylize(x, derrin) and Trabeate(x) -> Acetylize(x, seamus))\nforall x (Rename(x, aron) -> Acetylize(x, aron))\nforall x (Rename(x, seamus) -> Handleless(seamus))\nforall x (Acetylize(x, derrin) and Acetylize(derrin, aron) -> Handleless(aron))\n\nnot Trabeate(aron)\n\nforall x (Unneeded(x) and Bromate(x, aron) -> Trabeate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The kingston is laryngeal. The kingston deduct the ignatius. The kingston accelerate the ignatius. The ignatius is definite. The ignatius deduct the dom. The ignatius accelerate the kingston. The dom does not chase the kingston. The dom deceive the ignatius. The dom is carved. The dom deduct the kingston. The dom does not visit the kingston. The dom accelerate the ignatius. If something is carved and it accelerate the ignatius then it is laryngeal. If something deduct the dom then it does not chase the dom. If something is carved and definite then it deceive the dom. If the ignatius is typic then the ignatius is not laryngeal. If something deduct the kingston and it is laryngeal then it deduct the dom. If something deceive the ignatius then it deduct the ignatius. If something deceive the dom then the dom is uncomplete. If something deduct the kingston and the kingston deduct the ignatius then the ignatius is uncomplete. The kingston deceive the dom.", "logic": "\nLaryngeal(kingston)\nDeduct(kingston, ignatius)\nAccelerate(kingston, ignatius)\nDefinite(ignatius)\nDeduct(ignatius, dom)\nAccelerate(ignatius, kingston)\nnot Deceive(dom, kingston)\nDeceive(dom, ignatius)\nCarved(dom)\nDeduct(dom, kingston)\nnot Accelerate(dom, kingston)\nAccelerate(dom, ignatius)\nforall x (Carved(x) and Accelerate(x, ignatius) -> Laryngeal(x))\nforall x (Deduct(x, dom) -> not Deceive(x, dom))\nforall x (Carved(x) and Definite(x) -> Deceive(x, dom))\nTypic(ignatius) -> not Laryngeal(ignatius)\nforall x (Deduct(x, kingston) and Laryngeal(x) -> Deduct(x, dom))\nforall x (Deceive(x, ignatius) -> Deduct(x, ignatius))\nforall x (Deceive(x, dom) -> Uncomplete(dom))\nforall x (Deduct(x, kingston) and Deduct(kingston, ignatius) -> Uncomplete(ignatius))\n\nDeceive(kingston, dom)\n\nforall x (Carved(x) and Definite(x) -> Deceive(x, dom)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The ingeberg is uremic. The ingeberg interpose the piggy. The ingeberg prioritise the piggy. The piggy is gladdened. The piggy interpose the french. The piggy prioritise the ingeberg. The french does not chase the ingeberg. The french accost the piggy. The french is alchemical. The french interpose the ingeberg. The french does not visit the ingeberg. The french prioritise the piggy. If something is alchemical and it prioritise the piggy then it is uremic. If something interpose the french then it does not chase the french. If something is alchemical and gladdened then it accost the french. If the piggy is confident then the piggy is not uremic. If something interpose the ingeberg and it is uremic then it interpose the french. If something accost the piggy then it interpose the piggy. If something accost the french then the french is acquainted. If something interpose the ingeberg and the ingeberg interpose the piggy then the piggy is acquainted. The ingeberg is not alchemical.", "logic": "\nUremic(ingeberg)\nInterpose(ingeberg, piggy)\nPrioritise(ingeberg, piggy)\nGladdened(piggy)\nInterpose(piggy, french)\nPrioritise(piggy, ingeberg)\nnot Accost(french, ingeberg)\nAccost(french, piggy)\nAlchemical(french)\nInterpose(french, ingeberg)\nnot Prioritise(french, ingeberg)\nPrioritise(french, piggy)\nforall x (Alchemical(x) and Prioritise(x, piggy) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Interpose(x, french) -> not Accost(x, french))\nforall x (Alchemical(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Accost(x, french))\nConfident(piggy) -> not Uremic(piggy)\nforall x (Interpose(x, ingeberg) and Uremic(x) -> Interpose(x, french))\nforall x (Accost(x, piggy) -> Interpose(x, piggy))\nforall x (Accost(x, french) -> Acquainted(french))\nforall x (Interpose(x, ingeberg) and Interpose(ingeberg, piggy) -> Acquainted(piggy))\n\nnot Alchemical(ingeberg)\n\nnot Alchemical(ingeberg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The gunter is imperative. The gunter load the suellen. The gunter overrefine the suellen. The suellen is attested. The suellen load the kaiser. The suellen overrefine the gunter. The kaiser does not chase the gunter. The kaiser sacrifice the suellen. The kaiser is unrivalled. The kaiser load the gunter. The kaiser does not visit the gunter. The kaiser overrefine the suellen. If something is unrivalled and it overrefine the suellen then it is imperative. If something load the kaiser then it does not chase the kaiser. If something is unrivalled and attested then it sacrifice the kaiser. If the suellen is vedic then the suellen is not imperative. If something load the gunter and it is imperative then it load the kaiser. If something sacrifice the suellen then it load the suellen. If something sacrifice the kaiser then the kaiser is resolute. If something load the gunter and the gunter load the suellen then the suellen is resolute. The kaiser overrefine the kaiser.", "logic": "\nImperative(gunter)\nLoad(gunter, suellen)\nOverrefine(gunter, suellen)\nAttested(suellen)\nLoad(suellen, kaiser)\nOverrefine(suellen, gunter)\nnot Sacrifice(kaiser, gunter)\nSacrifice(kaiser, suellen)\nUnrivalled(kaiser)\nLoad(kaiser, gunter)\nnot Overrefine(kaiser, gunter)\nOverrefine(kaiser, suellen)\nforall x (Unrivalled(x) and Overrefine(x, suellen) -> Imperative(x))\nforall x (Load(x, kaiser) -> not Sacrifice(x, kaiser))\nforall x (Unrivalled(x) and Attested(x) -> Sacrifice(x, kaiser))\nVedic(suellen) -> not Imperative(suellen)\nforall x (Load(x, gunter) and Imperative(x) -> Load(x, kaiser))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, suellen) -> Load(x, suellen))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, kaiser) -> Resolute(kaiser))\nforall x (Load(x, gunter) and Load(gunter, suellen) -> Resolute(suellen))\n\nOverrefine(kaiser, kaiser)\n\nOverrefine(kaiser, kaiser) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The sonnnie is polyglot. The sonnnie throne the moira. The sonnnie peep the moira. The moira is parochial. The moira throne the ginevra. The moira peep the sonnnie. The ginevra does not chase the sonnnie. The ginevra motorcycle the moira. The ginevra is basilar. The ginevra throne the sonnnie. The ginevra does not visit the sonnnie. The ginevra peep the moira. If something is basilar and it peep the moira then it is polyglot. If something throne the ginevra then it does not chase the ginevra. If something is basilar and parochial then it motorcycle the ginevra. If the moira is kingly then the moira is not polyglot. If something throne the sonnnie and it is polyglot then it throne the ginevra. If something motorcycle the moira then it throne the moira. If something motorcycle the ginevra then the ginevra is outback. If something throne the sonnnie and the sonnnie throne the moira then the moira is outback. The moira does not visit the moira.", "logic": "\nPolyglot(sonnnie)\nThrone(sonnnie, moira)\nPeep(sonnnie, moira)\nParochial(moira)\nThrone(moira, ginevra)\nPeep(moira, sonnnie)\nnot Motorcycle(ginevra, sonnnie)\nMotorcycle(ginevra, moira)\nBasilar(ginevra)\nThrone(ginevra, sonnnie)\nnot Peep(ginevra, sonnnie)\nPeep(ginevra, moira)\nforall x (Basilar(x) and Peep(x, moira) -> Polyglot(x))\nforall x (Throne(x, ginevra) -> not Motorcycle(x, ginevra))\nforall x (Basilar(x) and Parochial(x) -> Motorcycle(x, ginevra))\nKingly(moira) -> not Polyglot(moira)\nforall x (Throne(x, sonnnie) and Polyglot(x) -> Throne(x, ginevra))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, moira) -> Throne(x, moira))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, ginevra) -> Outback(ginevra))\nforall x (Throne(x, sonnnie) and Throne(sonnnie, moira) -> Outback(moira))\n\nnot Peep(moira, moira)\n\nnot Peep(moira, moira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The heloise is flyaway. The heloise enjoin the janka. The heloise carom the janka. The janka is shallow. The janka enjoin the lidia. The janka carom the heloise. The lidia does not chase the heloise. The lidia avow the janka. The lidia is fluffy. The lidia enjoin the heloise. The lidia does not visit the heloise. The lidia carom the janka. If something is fluffy and it carom the janka then it is flyaway. If something enjoin the lidia then it does not chase the lidia. If something is fluffy and shallow then it avow the lidia. If the janka is unwell then the janka is not flyaway. If something enjoin the heloise and it is flyaway then it enjoin the lidia. If something avow the janka then it enjoin the janka. If something avow the lidia then the lidia is unroofed. If something enjoin the heloise and the heloise enjoin the janka then the janka is unroofed. The janka is unwell.", "logic": "\nFlyaway(heloise)\nEnjoin(heloise, janka)\nCarom(heloise, janka)\nShallow(janka)\nEnjoin(janka, lidia)\nCarom(janka, heloise)\nnot Avow(lidia, heloise)\nAvow(lidia, janka)\nFluffy(lidia)\nEnjoin(lidia, heloise)\nnot Carom(lidia, heloise)\nCarom(lidia, janka)\nforall x (Fluffy(x) and Carom(x, janka) -> Flyaway(x))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, lidia) -> not Avow(x, lidia))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) and Shallow(x) -> Avow(x, lidia))\nUnwell(janka) -> not Flyaway(janka)\nforall x (Enjoin(x, heloise) and Flyaway(x) -> Enjoin(x, lidia))\nforall x (Avow(x, janka) -> Enjoin(x, janka))\nforall x (Avow(x, lidia) -> Unroofed(lidia))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, heloise) and Enjoin(heloise, janka) -> Unroofed(janka))\n\nUnwell(janka)\n\nUnwell(janka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The halie is not varnished. The halie scamp the jannel. The pacifica sinter the lenny. The pacifica is not varnished. The jannel does not need the halie. The lenny is not armenian. The lenny paste the pacifica. If the pacifica scamp the halie then the halie does not visit the lenny. If someone scamp the jannel and they are armenian then the jannel is bulky. If someone paste the jannel then they need the halie. If someone paste the pacifica then they need the lenny. If someone sinter the lenny then the lenny is bulky. If the pacifica sinter the lenny then the pacifica paste the jannel. The jannel does not need the halie.", "logic": "\nnot Varnished(halie)\nScamp(halie, jannel)\nSinter(pacifica, lenny)\nnot Varnished(pacifica)\nnot Scamp(jannel, halie)\nnot Armenian(lenny)\nPaste(lenny, pacifica)\nScamp(pacifica, halie) -> not Paste(halie, lenny)\nforall x (Scamp(x, jannel) and Armenian(x) -> Bulky(jannel))\nforall x (Paste(x, jannel) -> Scamp(x, halie))\nforall x (Paste(x, pacifica) -> Scamp(x, lenny))\nforall x (Sinter(x, lenny) -> Bulky(lenny))\nSinter(pacifica, lenny) -> Paste(pacifica, jannel)\n\nnot Scamp(jannel, halie)\n\ntherefore not Scamp(jannel, halie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The alford is not vagabond. The alford festinate the lorianna. The elenore chance the abbot. The elenore is not vagabond. The lorianna does not need the alford. The abbot is not edematous. The abbot conceal the elenore. If the elenore festinate the alford then the alford does not visit the abbot. If someone festinate the lorianna and they are edematous then the lorianna is catabatic. If someone conceal the lorianna then they need the alford. If someone conceal the elenore then they need the abbot. If someone chance the abbot then the abbot is catabatic. If the elenore chance the abbot then the elenore conceal the lorianna. The elenore is vagabond.", "logic": "\nnot Vagabond(alford)\nFestinate(alford, lorianna)\nChance(elenore, abbot)\nnot Vagabond(elenore)\nnot Festinate(lorianna, alford)\nnot Edematous(abbot)\nConceal(abbot, elenore)\nFestinate(elenore, alford) -> not Conceal(alford, abbot)\nforall x (Festinate(x, lorianna) and Edematous(x) -> Catabatic(lorianna))\nforall x (Conceal(x, lorianna) -> Festinate(x, alford))\nforall x (Conceal(x, elenore) -> Festinate(x, abbot))\nforall x (Chance(x, abbot) -> Catabatic(abbot))\nChance(elenore, abbot) -> Conceal(elenore, lorianna)\n\nVagabond(elenore)\n\ntherefore not Vagabond(elenore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The tiertza is not pulmonary. The tiertza outgeneral the everard. The willdon scroll the lorie. The willdon is not pulmonary. The everard does not need the tiertza. The lorie is not unmown. The lorie bell the willdon. If the willdon outgeneral the tiertza then the tiertza does not visit the lorie. If someone outgeneral the everard and they are unmown then the everard is enteral. If someone bell the everard then they need the tiertza. If someone bell the willdon then they need the lorie. If someone scroll the lorie then the lorie is enteral. If the willdon scroll the lorie then the willdon bell the everard. The lorie outgeneral the lorie.", "logic": "\nnot Pulmonary(tiertza)\nOutgeneral(tiertza, everard)\nScroll(willdon, lorie)\nnot Pulmonary(willdon)\nnot Outgeneral(everard, tiertza)\nnot Unmown(lorie)\nBell(lorie, willdon)\nOutgeneral(willdon, tiertza) -> not Bell(tiertza, lorie)\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, everard) and Unmown(x) -> Enteral(everard))\nforall x (Bell(x, everard) -> Outgeneral(x, tiertza))\nforall x (Bell(x, willdon) -> Outgeneral(x, lorie))\nforall x (Scroll(x, lorie) -> Enteral(lorie))\nScroll(willdon, lorie) -> Bell(willdon, everard)\n\nOutgeneral(lorie, lorie)\n\nBell(lorie, willdon) and forall x (Bell(x, willdon) -> Outgeneral(x, lorie)) -> therefore Outgeneral(lorie, lorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The rodrigo is not beneficial. The rodrigo stall the peggi. The kaylil regale the ilise. The kaylil is not beneficial. The peggi does not need the rodrigo. The ilise is not accordant. The ilise talk the kaylil. If the kaylil stall the rodrigo then the rodrigo does not visit the ilise. If someone stall the peggi and they are accordant then the peggi is appeasable. If someone talk the peggi then they need the rodrigo. If someone talk the kaylil then they need the ilise. If someone regale the ilise then the ilise is appeasable. If the kaylil regale the ilise then the kaylil talk the peggi. The ilise does not need the ilise.", "logic": "\nnot Beneficial(rodrigo)\nStall(rodrigo, peggi)\nRegale(kaylil, ilise)\nnot Beneficial(kaylil)\nnot Stall(peggi, rodrigo)\nnot Accordant(ilise)\nTalk(ilise, kaylil)\nStall(kaylil, rodrigo) -> not Talk(rodrigo, ilise)\nforall x (Stall(x, peggi) and Accordant(x) -> Appeasable(peggi))\nforall x (Talk(x, peggi) -> Stall(x, rodrigo))\nforall x (Talk(x, kaylil) -> Stall(x, ilise))\nforall x (Regale(x, ilise) -> Appeasable(ilise))\nRegale(kaylil, ilise) -> Talk(kaylil, peggi)\n\nnot Stall(ilise, ilise)\n\nTalk(ilise, kaylil) and forall x (Talk(x, kaylil) -> Stall(x, ilise)) -> therefore Stall(ilise, ilise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The dimitrios is not inguinal. The dimitrios cultivate the jedediah. The jessalin elope the delcina. The jessalin is not inguinal. The jedediah does not need the dimitrios. The delcina is not posed. The delcina harangue the jessalin. If the jessalin cultivate the dimitrios then the dimitrios does not visit the delcina. If someone cultivate the jedediah and they are posed then the jedediah is formulaic. If someone harangue the jedediah then they need the dimitrios. If someone harangue the jessalin then they need the delcina. If someone elope the delcina then the delcina is formulaic. If the jessalin elope the delcina then the jessalin harangue the jedediah. The jessalin cultivate the dimitrios.", "logic": "\nnot Inguinal(dimitrios)\nCultivate(dimitrios, jedediah)\nElope(jessalin, delcina)\nnot Inguinal(jessalin)\nnot Cultivate(jedediah, dimitrios)\nnot Posed(delcina)\nHarangue(delcina, jessalin)\nCultivate(jessalin, dimitrios) -> not Harangue(dimitrios, delcina)\nforall x (Cultivate(x, jedediah) and Posed(x) -> Formulaic(jedediah))\nforall x (Harangue(x, jedediah) -> Cultivate(x, dimitrios))\nforall x (Harangue(x, jessalin) -> Cultivate(x, delcina))\nforall x (Elope(x, delcina) -> Formulaic(delcina))\nElope(jessalin, delcina) -> Harangue(jessalin, jedediah)\n\nCultivate(jessalin, dimitrios)\n\nElope(jessalin, delcina) and Elope(jessalin, delcina) -> Harangue(jessalin, jedediah) -> therefore Harangue(jessalin, jedediah) Harangue(jessalin, jedediah) and forall x (Harangue(x, jedediah) -> Cultivate(x, dimitrios)) -> therefore Cultivate(jessalin, dimitrios)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The caroljean is not mastoid. The caroljean amnesty the vijay. The lauren jangle the lela. The lauren is not mastoid. The vijay does not need the caroljean. The lela is not supporting. The lela philander the lauren. If the lauren amnesty the caroljean then the caroljean does not visit the lela. If someone amnesty the vijay and they are supporting then the vijay is unaffected. If someone philander the vijay then they need the caroljean. If someone philander the lauren then they need the lela. If someone jangle the lela then the lela is unaffected. If the lauren jangle the lela then the lauren philander the vijay. The lauren does not need the caroljean.", "logic": "\nnot Mastoid(caroljean)\nAmnesty(caroljean, vijay)\nJangle(lauren, lela)\nnot Mastoid(lauren)\nnot Amnesty(vijay, caroljean)\nnot Supporting(lela)\nPhilander(lela, lauren)\nAmnesty(lauren, caroljean) -> not Philander(caroljean, lela)\nforall x (Amnesty(x, vijay) and Supporting(x) -> Unaffected(vijay))\nforall x (Philander(x, vijay) -> Amnesty(x, caroljean))\nforall x (Philander(x, lauren) -> Amnesty(x, lela))\nforall x (Jangle(x, lela) -> Unaffected(lela))\nJangle(lauren, lela) -> Philander(lauren, vijay)\n\nnot Amnesty(lauren, caroljean)\n\nJangle(lauren, lela) and Jangle(lauren, lela) -> Philander(lauren, vijay) -> therefore Philander(lauren, vijay) Philander(lauren, vijay) and forall x (Philander(x, vijay) -> Amnesty(x, caroljean)) -> therefore Amnesty(lauren, caroljean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The zonda is not endogenic. The zonda debate the stuart. The carroll pulp the verge. The carroll is not endogenic. The stuart does not need the zonda. The verge is not outlined. The verge prime the carroll. If the carroll debate the zonda then the zonda does not visit the verge. If someone debate the stuart and they are outlined then the stuart is glaucous. If someone prime the stuart then they need the zonda. If someone prime the carroll then they need the verge. If someone pulp the verge then the verge is glaucous. If the carroll pulp the verge then the carroll prime the stuart. The zonda does not visit the verge.", "logic": "\nnot Endogenic(zonda)\nDebate(zonda, stuart)\nPulp(carroll, verge)\nnot Endogenic(carroll)\nnot Debate(stuart, zonda)\nnot Outlined(verge)\nPrime(verge, carroll)\nDebate(carroll, zonda) -> not Prime(zonda, verge)\nforall x (Debate(x, stuart) and Outlined(x) -> Glaucous(stuart))\nforall x (Prime(x, stuart) -> Debate(x, zonda))\nforall x (Prime(x, carroll) -> Debate(x, verge))\nforall x (Pulp(x, verge) -> Glaucous(verge))\nPulp(carroll, verge) -> Prime(carroll, stuart)\n\nnot Prime(zonda, verge)\n\nPulp(carroll, verge) and Pulp(carroll, verge) -> Prime(carroll, stuart) -> therefore Prime(carroll, stuart) Prime(carroll, stuart) and forall x (Prime(x, stuart) -> Debate(x, zonda)) -> therefore Debate(carroll, zonda) Debate(carroll, zonda) and Debate(carroll, zonda) -> not Prime(zonda, verge) -> therefore not Prime(zonda, verge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The guglielma is not appeasable. The guglielma squire the rodie. The pearle beard the galina. The pearle is not appeasable. The rodie does not need the guglielma. The galina is not scrimpy. The galina disinherit the pearle. If the pearle squire the guglielma then the guglielma does not visit the galina. If someone squire the rodie and they are scrimpy then the rodie is forfeited. If someone disinherit the rodie then they need the guglielma. If someone disinherit the pearle then they need the galina. If someone beard the galina then the galina is forfeited. If the pearle beard the galina then the pearle disinherit the rodie. The guglielma disinherit the galina.", "logic": "\nnot Appeasable(guglielma)\nSquire(guglielma, rodie)\nBeard(pearle, galina)\nnot Appeasable(pearle)\nnot Squire(rodie, guglielma)\nnot Scrimpy(galina)\nDisinherit(galina, pearle)\nSquire(pearle, guglielma) -> not Disinherit(guglielma, galina)\nforall x (Squire(x, rodie) and Scrimpy(x) -> Forfeited(rodie))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, rodie) -> Squire(x, guglielma))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, pearle) -> Squire(x, galina))\nforall x (Beard(x, galina) -> Forfeited(galina))\nBeard(pearle, galina) -> Disinherit(pearle, rodie)\n\nDisinherit(guglielma, galina)\n\nBeard(pearle, galina) and Beard(pearle, galina) -> Disinherit(pearle, rodie) -> therefore Disinherit(pearle, rodie) Disinherit(pearle, rodie) and forall x (Disinherit(x, rodie) -> Squire(x, guglielma)) -> therefore Squire(pearle, guglielma) Squire(pearle, guglielma) and Squire(pearle, guglielma) -> not Disinherit(guglielma, galina) -> therefore not Disinherit(guglielma, galina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The kailey is not discoid. The kailey creosote the justis. The jacquelyn vaporise the jacquelyn. The jacquelyn is not discoid. The justis does not need the kailey. The jacquelyn is not septrional. The jacquelyn falter the jacquelyn. If the jacquelyn creosote the kailey then the kailey does not visit the jacquelyn. If someone creosote the justis and they are septrional then the justis is diffuse. If someone falter the justis then they need the kailey. If someone falter the jacquelyn then they need the jacquelyn. If someone vaporise the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn is diffuse. If the jacquelyn vaporise the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn falter the justis. The kailey does not need the jacquelyn.", "logic": "\nnot Discoid(kailey)\nCreosote(kailey, justis)\nVaporise(jacquelyn, jacquelyn)\nnot Discoid(jacquelyn)\nnot Creosote(justis, kailey)\nnot Septrional(jacquelyn)\nFalter(jacquelyn, jacquelyn)\nCreosote(jacquelyn, kailey) -> not Falter(kailey, jacquelyn)\nforall x (Creosote(x, justis) and Septrional(x) -> Diffuse(justis))\nforall x (Falter(x, justis) -> Creosote(x, kailey))\nforall x (Falter(x, jacquelyn) -> Creosote(x, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Vaporise(x, jacquelyn) -> Diffuse(jacquelyn))\nVaporise(jacquelyn, jacquelyn) -> Falter(jacquelyn, justis)\n\nnot Creosote(kailey, jacquelyn)\n\nforall x (Falter(x, jacquelyn) -> Creosote(x, jacquelyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The estel is not unforceful. The estel saint the orsa. The philippe palter the vasili. The philippe is not unforceful. The orsa does not need the estel. The vasili is not metrical. The vasili reprimand the philippe. If the philippe saint the estel then the estel does not visit the vasili. If someone saint the orsa and they are metrical then the orsa is operative. If someone reprimand the orsa then they need the estel. If someone reprimand the philippe then they need the vasili. If someone palter the vasili then the vasili is operative. If the philippe palter the vasili then the philippe reprimand the orsa. The vasili saint the estel.", "logic": "\nnot Unforceful(estel)\nSaint(estel, orsa)\nPalter(philippe, vasili)\nnot Unforceful(philippe)\nnot Saint(orsa, estel)\nnot Metrical(vasili)\nReprimand(vasili, philippe)\nSaint(philippe, estel) -> not Reprimand(estel, vasili)\nforall x (Saint(x, orsa) and Metrical(x) -> Operative(orsa))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, orsa) -> Saint(x, estel))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, philippe) -> Saint(x, vasili))\nforall x (Palter(x, vasili) -> Operative(vasili))\nPalter(philippe, vasili) -> Reprimand(philippe, orsa)\n\nSaint(vasili, estel)\n\nforall x (Reprimand(x, orsa) -> Saint(x, estel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The dulcine is not glandular. The dulcine repress the cleva. The deanna crape the orin. The deanna is not glandular. The cleva does not need the dulcine. The orin is not labeled. The orin model the deanna. If the deanna repress the dulcine then the dulcine does not visit the orin. If someone repress the cleva and they are labeled then the cleva is hexangular. If someone model the cleva then they need the dulcine. If someone model the deanna then they need the orin. If someone crape the orin then the orin is hexangular. If the deanna crape the orin then the deanna model the cleva. The cleva is not hexangular.", "logic": "\nnot Glandular(dulcine)\nRepress(dulcine, cleva)\nCrape(deanna, orin)\nnot Glandular(deanna)\nnot Repress(cleva, dulcine)\nnot Labeled(orin)\nModel(orin, deanna)\nRepress(deanna, dulcine) -> not Model(dulcine, orin)\nforall x (Repress(x, cleva) and Labeled(x) -> Hexangular(cleva))\nforall x (Model(x, cleva) -> Repress(x, dulcine))\nforall x (Model(x, deanna) -> Repress(x, orin))\nforall x (Crape(x, orin) -> Hexangular(orin))\nCrape(deanna, orin) -> Model(deanna, cleva)\n\nnot Hexangular(cleva)\n\nforall x (Repress(x, cleva) and Labeled(x) -> Hexangular(cleva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The carmella is not unhuman. The carmella void the adina. The derron spotlight the mignon. The derron is not unhuman. The adina does not need the carmella. The mignon is not wroth. The mignon uncase the derron. If the derron void the carmella then the carmella does not visit the mignon. If someone void the adina and they are wroth then the adina is naughty. If someone uncase the adina then they need the carmella. If someone uncase the derron then they need the mignon. If someone spotlight the mignon then the mignon is naughty. If the derron spotlight the mignon then the derron uncase the adina. The adina void the mignon.", "logic": "\nnot Unhuman(carmella)\nVoid(carmella, adina)\nSpotlight(derron, mignon)\nnot Unhuman(derron)\nnot Void(adina, carmella)\nnot Wroth(mignon)\nUncase(mignon, derron)\nVoid(derron, carmella) -> not Uncase(carmella, mignon)\nforall x (Void(x, adina) and Wroth(x) -> Naughty(adina))\nforall x (Uncase(x, adina) -> Void(x, carmella))\nforall x (Uncase(x, derron) -> Void(x, mignon))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, mignon) -> Naughty(mignon))\nSpotlight(derron, mignon) -> Uncase(derron, adina)\n\nVoid(adina, mignon)\n\nforall x (Uncase(x, derron) -> Void(x, mignon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The carina is not covariant. The carina depose the claudine. The ambrosi cleat the carmelita. The ambrosi is not covariant. The claudine does not need the carina. The carmelita is not rupicolous. The carmelita ruck the ambrosi. If the ambrosi depose the carina then the carina does not visit the carmelita. If someone depose the claudine and they are rupicolous then the claudine is legato. If someone ruck the claudine then they need the carina. If someone ruck the ambrosi then they need the carmelita. If someone cleat the carmelita then the carmelita is legato. If the ambrosi cleat the carmelita then the ambrosi ruck the claudine. The carmelita is not covariant.", "logic": "\nnot Covariant(carina)\nDepose(carina, claudine)\nCleat(ambrosi, carmelita)\nnot Covariant(ambrosi)\nnot Depose(claudine, carina)\nnot Rupicolous(carmelita)\nRuck(carmelita, ambrosi)\nDepose(ambrosi, carina) -> not Ruck(carina, carmelita)\nforall x (Depose(x, claudine) and Rupicolous(x) -> Legato(claudine))\nforall x (Ruck(x, claudine) -> Depose(x, carina))\nforall x (Ruck(x, ambrosi) -> Depose(x, carmelita))\nforall x (Cleat(x, carmelita) -> Legato(carmelita))\nCleat(ambrosi, carmelita) -> Ruck(ambrosi, claudine)\n\nnot Covariant(carmelita)\n\nnot Covariant(carmelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The perry is not uninviting. The perry fragment the dyna. The sonny expatiate the rollin. The sonny is not uninviting. The dyna does not need the perry. The rollin is not pledged. The rollin sniffle the sonny. If the sonny fragment the perry then the perry does not visit the rollin. If someone fragment the dyna and they are pledged then the dyna is adscript. If someone sniffle the dyna then they need the perry. If someone sniffle the sonny then they need the rollin. If someone expatiate the rollin then the rollin is adscript. If the sonny expatiate the rollin then the sonny sniffle the dyna. The rollin sniffle the dyna.", "logic": "\nnot Uninviting(perry)\nFragment(perry, dyna)\nExpatiate(sonny, rollin)\nnot Uninviting(sonny)\nnot Fragment(dyna, perry)\nnot Pledged(rollin)\nSniffle(rollin, sonny)\nFragment(sonny, perry) -> not Sniffle(perry, rollin)\nforall x (Fragment(x, dyna) and Pledged(x) -> Adscript(dyna))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, dyna) -> Fragment(x, perry))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, sonny) -> Fragment(x, rollin))\nforall x (Expatiate(x, rollin) -> Adscript(rollin))\nExpatiate(sonny, rollin) -> Sniffle(sonny, dyna)\n\nSniffle(rollin, dyna)\n\nSniffle(rollin, dyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The melody is not plotted. The melody snub the ethelda. The pierette buffalo the raquela. The pierette is not plotted. The ethelda does not need the melody. The raquela is not unsure. The raquela hoist the pierette. If the pierette snub the melody then the melody does not visit the raquela. If someone snub the ethelda and they are unsure then the ethelda is lilting. If someone hoist the ethelda then they need the melody. If someone hoist the pierette then they need the raquela. If someone buffalo the raquela then the raquela is lilting. If the pierette buffalo the raquela then the pierette hoist the ethelda. The melody is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Plotted(melody)\nSnub(melody, ethelda)\nBuffalo(pierette, raquela)\nnot Plotted(pierette)\nnot Snub(ethelda, melody)\nnot Unsure(raquela)\nHoist(raquela, pierette)\nSnub(pierette, melody) -> not Hoist(melody, raquela)\nforall x (Snub(x, ethelda) and Unsure(x) -> Lilting(ethelda))\nforall x (Hoist(x, ethelda) -> Snub(x, melody))\nforall x (Hoist(x, pierette) -> Snub(x, raquela))\nforall x (Buffalo(x, raquela) -> Lilting(raquela))\nBuffalo(pierette, raquela) -> Hoist(pierette, ethelda)\n\nnot Round(melody)\n\nnot Round(melody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The devonne is not sensible. The devonne liquidise the joao. The jana inter the horace. The jana is not sensible. The joao does not need the devonne. The horace is not autarkic. The horace invade the jana. If the jana liquidise the devonne then the devonne does not visit the horace. If someone liquidise the joao and they are autarkic then the joao is variant. If someone invade the joao then they need the devonne. If someone invade the jana then they need the horace. If someone inter the horace then the horace is variant. If the jana inter the horace then the jana invade the joao. The horace inter the jana.", "logic": "\nnot Sensible(devonne)\nLiquidise(devonne, joao)\nInter(jana, horace)\nnot Sensible(jana)\nnot Liquidise(joao, devonne)\nnot Autarkic(horace)\nInvade(horace, jana)\nLiquidise(jana, devonne) -> not Invade(devonne, horace)\nforall x (Liquidise(x, joao) and Autarkic(x) -> Variant(joao))\nforall x (Invade(x, joao) -> Liquidise(x, devonne))\nforall x (Invade(x, jana) -> Liquidise(x, horace))\nforall x (Inter(x, horace) -> Variant(horace))\nInter(jana, horace) -> Invade(jana, joao)\n\nInter(horace, jana)\n\nInter(horace, jana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The dinny redirect the belinda. The dinny is bronzy. The dinny place the vinni. The vinni redirect the belinda. The vinni is inborn. The vinni whish the dinny. The belinda redirect the vinni. If someone is auriform then they like the belinda. If someone redirect the belinda and they are not bronzy then the belinda is not lobular. If someone whish the belinda then they do not see the belinda. If the vinni redirect the belinda then the vinni is auriform. If someone whish the belinda and the belinda is auriform then the belinda does not see the dinny. If someone is lobular and they do not see the belinda then they like the vinni. If someone redirect the vinni then they are chargeable. If someone is chargeable and they do not like the vinni then they do not eat the vinni. The vinni redirect the belinda.", "logic": "\nRedirect(dinny, belinda)\nBronzy(dinny)\nPlace(dinny, vinni)\nRedirect(vinni, belinda)\nInborn(vinni)\nWhish(vinni, dinny)\nRedirect(belinda, vinni)\nforall x (Auriform(x) -> Whish(x, belinda))\nforall x (Redirect(x, belinda) and not Bronzy(x) -> not Lobular(belinda))\nforall x (Whish(x, belinda) -> not Place(x, belinda))\nRedirect(vinni, belinda) -> Auriform(vinni)\nforall x (Whish(x, belinda) and Auriform(belinda) -> not Place(belinda, dinny))\nforall x (Lobular(x) and not Place(x, belinda) -> Whish(x, vinni))\nforall x (Redirect(x, vinni) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and not Whish(x, vinni) -> not Redirect(x, vinni))\n\nRedirect(vinni, belinda)\n\ntherefore Redirect(vinni, belinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The jennee spondaize the reilly. The jennee is dastardly. The jennee singsong the pippy. The pippy spondaize the reilly. The pippy is antemortem. The pippy graze the jennee. The reilly spondaize the pippy. If someone is tsaristic then they like the reilly. If someone spondaize the reilly and they are not dastardly then the reilly is not chagrined. If someone graze the reilly then they do not see the reilly. If the pippy spondaize the reilly then the pippy is tsaristic. If someone graze the reilly and the reilly is tsaristic then the reilly does not see the jennee. If someone is chagrined and they do not see the reilly then they like the pippy. If someone spondaize the pippy then they are slivery. If someone is slivery and they do not like the pippy then they do not eat the pippy. The reilly does not eat the pippy.", "logic": "\nSpondaize(jennee, reilly)\nDastardly(jennee)\nSingsong(jennee, pippy)\nSpondaize(pippy, reilly)\nAntemortem(pippy)\nGraze(pippy, jennee)\nSpondaize(reilly, pippy)\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Graze(x, reilly))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, reilly) and not Dastardly(x) -> not Chagrined(reilly))\nforall x (Graze(x, reilly) -> not Singsong(x, reilly))\nSpondaize(pippy, reilly) -> Tsaristic(pippy)\nforall x (Graze(x, reilly) and Tsaristic(reilly) -> not Singsong(reilly, jennee))\nforall x (Chagrined(x) and not Singsong(x, reilly) -> Graze(x, pippy))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, pippy) -> Slivery(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) and not Graze(x, pippy) -> not Spondaize(x, pippy))\n\nnot Spondaize(reilly, pippy)\n\ntherefore Spondaize(reilly, pippy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The kelley readjust the joao. The kelley is dextrous. The kelley depopulate the velma. The velma readjust the joao. The velma is unsporting. The velma dibble the kelley. The joao readjust the velma. If someone is affiliated then they like the joao. If someone readjust the joao and they are not dextrous then the joao is not chiliastic. If someone dibble the joao then they do not see the joao. If the velma readjust the joao then the velma is affiliated. If someone dibble the joao and the joao is affiliated then the joao does not see the kelley. If someone is chiliastic and they do not see the joao then they like the velma. If someone readjust the velma then they are adolescent. If someone is adolescent and they do not like the velma then they do not eat the velma. The velma is affiliated.", "logic": "\nReadjust(kelley, joao)\nDextrous(kelley)\nDepopulate(kelley, velma)\nReadjust(velma, joao)\nUnsporting(velma)\nDibble(velma, kelley)\nReadjust(joao, velma)\nforall x (Affiliated(x) -> Dibble(x, joao))\nforall x (Readjust(x, joao) and not Dextrous(x) -> not Chiliastic(joao))\nforall x (Dibble(x, joao) -> not Depopulate(x, joao))\nReadjust(velma, joao) -> Affiliated(velma)\nforall x (Dibble(x, joao) and Affiliated(joao) -> not Depopulate(joao, kelley))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) and not Depopulate(x, joao) -> Dibble(x, velma))\nforall x (Readjust(x, velma) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) and not Dibble(x, velma) -> not Readjust(x, velma))\n\nAffiliated(velma)\n\nReadjust(velma, joao) and Readjust(velma, joao) -> Affiliated(velma) -> therefore Affiliated(velma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The kass reheel the katie. The kass is unfilmed. The kass visit the jacinta. The jacinta reheel the katie. The jacinta is outermost. The jacinta disengage the kass. The katie reheel the jacinta. If someone is injectable then they like the katie. If someone reheel the katie and they are not unfilmed then the katie is not friable. If someone disengage the katie then they do not see the katie. If the jacinta reheel the katie then the jacinta is injectable. If someone disengage the katie and the katie is injectable then the katie does not see the kass. If someone is friable and they do not see the katie then they like the jacinta. If someone reheel the jacinta then they are ceylonese. If someone is ceylonese and they do not like the jacinta then they do not eat the jacinta. The jacinta is not injectable.", "logic": "\nReheel(kass, katie)\nUnfilmed(kass)\nVisit(kass, jacinta)\nReheel(jacinta, katie)\nOutermost(jacinta)\nDisengage(jacinta, kass)\nReheel(katie, jacinta)\nforall x (Injectable(x) -> Disengage(x, katie))\nforall x (Reheel(x, katie) and not Unfilmed(x) -> not Friable(katie))\nforall x (Disengage(x, katie) -> not Visit(x, katie))\nReheel(jacinta, katie) -> Injectable(jacinta)\nforall x (Disengage(x, katie) and Injectable(katie) -> not Visit(katie, kass))\nforall x (Friable(x) and not Visit(x, katie) -> Disengage(x, jacinta))\nforall x (Reheel(x, jacinta) -> Ceylonese(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) and not Disengage(x, jacinta) -> not Reheel(x, jacinta))\n\nnot Injectable(jacinta)\n\nReheel(jacinta, katie) and Reheel(jacinta, katie) -> Injectable(jacinta) -> therefore Injectable(jacinta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The andie docket the malissa. The andie is jagged. The andie amend the quiggly. The quiggly docket the malissa. The quiggly is beta. The quiggly fossilize the andie. The malissa docket the quiggly. If someone is shaggy then they like the malissa. If someone docket the malissa and they are not jagged then the malissa is not toothsome. If someone fossilize the malissa then they do not see the malissa. If the quiggly docket the malissa then the quiggly is shaggy. If someone fossilize the malissa and the malissa is shaggy then the malissa does not see the andie. If someone is toothsome and they do not see the malissa then they like the quiggly. If someone docket the quiggly then they are insatiable. If someone is insatiable and they do not like the quiggly then they do not eat the quiggly. The quiggly fossilize the malissa.", "logic": "\nDocket(andie, malissa)\nJagged(andie)\nAmend(andie, quiggly)\nDocket(quiggly, malissa)\nBeta(quiggly)\nFossilize(quiggly, andie)\nDocket(malissa, quiggly)\nforall x (Shaggy(x) -> Fossilize(x, malissa))\nforall x (Docket(x, malissa) and not Jagged(x) -> not Toothsome(malissa))\nforall x (Fossilize(x, malissa) -> not Amend(x, malissa))\nDocket(quiggly, malissa) -> Shaggy(quiggly)\nforall x (Fossilize(x, malissa) and Shaggy(malissa) -> not Amend(malissa, andie))\nforall x (Toothsome(x) and not Amend(x, malissa) -> Fossilize(x, quiggly))\nforall x (Docket(x, quiggly) -> Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Insatiable(x) and not Fossilize(x, quiggly) -> not Docket(x, quiggly))\n\nFossilize(quiggly, malissa)\n\nDocket(quiggly, malissa) and Docket(quiggly, malissa) -> Shaggy(quiggly) -> therefore Shaggy(quiggly) Shaggy(quiggly) and forall x (Shaggy(x) -> Fossilize(x, malissa)) -> therefore Fossilize(quiggly, malissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The poul precook the katina. The poul is straw. The poul canal the tobit. The tobit precook the katina. The tobit is honorific. The tobit repute the poul. The katina precook the tobit. If someone is unsleeping then they like the katina. If someone precook the katina and they are not straw then the katina is not navicular. If someone repute the katina then they do not see the katina. If the tobit precook the katina then the tobit is unsleeping. If someone repute the katina and the katina is unsleeping then the katina does not see the poul. If someone is navicular and they do not see the katina then they like the tobit. If someone precook the tobit then they are turbid. If someone is turbid and they do not like the tobit then they do not eat the tobit. The tobit does not like the katina.", "logic": "\nPrecook(poul, katina)\nStraw(poul)\nCanal(poul, tobit)\nPrecook(tobit, katina)\nHonorific(tobit)\nRepute(tobit, poul)\nPrecook(katina, tobit)\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) -> Repute(x, katina))\nforall x (Precook(x, katina) and not Straw(x) -> not Navicular(katina))\nforall x (Repute(x, katina) -> not Canal(x, katina))\nPrecook(tobit, katina) -> Unsleeping(tobit)\nforall x (Repute(x, katina) and Unsleeping(katina) -> not Canal(katina, poul))\nforall x (Navicular(x) and not Canal(x, katina) -> Repute(x, tobit))\nforall x (Precook(x, tobit) -> Turbid(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) and not Repute(x, tobit) -> not Precook(x, tobit))\n\nnot Repute(tobit, katina)\n\nPrecook(tobit, katina) and Precook(tobit, katina) -> Unsleeping(tobit) -> therefore Unsleeping(tobit) Unsleeping(tobit) and forall x (Unsleeping(x) -> Repute(x, katina)) -> therefore Repute(tobit, katina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The bengt scorch the carlos. The bengt is faux. The bengt conk the pryce. The pryce scorch the carlos. The pryce is agnostical. The pryce compel the bengt. The carlos scorch the pryce. If someone is bathyal then they like the carlos. If someone scorch the carlos and they are not faux then the carlos is not amphibious. If someone compel the carlos then they do not see the carlos. If the pryce scorch the carlos then the pryce is bathyal. If someone compel the carlos and the carlos is bathyal then the carlos does not see the bengt. If someone is amphibious and they do not see the carlos then they like the pryce. If someone scorch the pryce then they are senecan. If someone is senecan and they do not like the pryce then they do not eat the pryce. The pryce does not see the carlos.", "logic": "\nScorch(bengt, carlos)\nFaux(bengt)\nConk(bengt, pryce)\nScorch(pryce, carlos)\nAgnostical(pryce)\nCompel(pryce, bengt)\nScorch(carlos, pryce)\nforall x (Bathyal(x) -> Compel(x, carlos))\nforall x (Scorch(x, carlos) and not Faux(x) -> not Amphibious(carlos))\nforall x (Compel(x, carlos) -> not Conk(x, carlos))\nScorch(pryce, carlos) -> Bathyal(pryce)\nforall x (Compel(x, carlos) and Bathyal(carlos) -> not Conk(carlos, bengt))\nforall x (Amphibious(x) and not Conk(x, carlos) -> Compel(x, pryce))\nforall x (Scorch(x, pryce) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) and not Compel(x, pryce) -> not Scorch(x, pryce))\n\nnot Conk(pryce, carlos)\n\nScorch(pryce, carlos) and Scorch(pryce, carlos) -> Bathyal(pryce) -> therefore Bathyal(pryce) Bathyal(pryce) and forall x (Bathyal(x) -> Compel(x, carlos)) -> therefore Compel(pryce, carlos) Compel(pryce, carlos) and forall x (Compel(x, carlos) -> not Conk(x, carlos)) -> therefore not Conk(pryce, carlos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The hervey overhear the faustine. The hervey is vaporous. The hervey dulcify the correna. The correna overhear the faustine. The correna is rhizoidal. The correna snarl the hervey. The faustine overhear the correna. If someone is assisted then they like the faustine. If someone overhear the faustine and they are not vaporous then the faustine is not flushed. If someone snarl the faustine then they do not see the faustine. If the correna overhear the faustine then the correna is assisted. If someone snarl the faustine and the faustine is assisted then the faustine does not see the hervey. If someone is flushed and they do not see the faustine then they like the correna. If someone overhear the correna then they are hedonic. If someone is hedonic and they do not like the correna then they do not eat the correna. The correna dulcify the faustine.", "logic": "\nOverhear(hervey, faustine)\nVaporous(hervey)\nDulcify(hervey, correna)\nOverhear(correna, faustine)\nRhizoidal(correna)\nSnarl(correna, hervey)\nOverhear(faustine, correna)\nforall x (Assisted(x) -> Snarl(x, faustine))\nforall x (Overhear(x, faustine) and not Vaporous(x) -> not Flushed(faustine))\nforall x (Snarl(x, faustine) -> not Dulcify(x, faustine))\nOverhear(correna, faustine) -> Assisted(correna)\nforall x (Snarl(x, faustine) and Assisted(faustine) -> not Dulcify(faustine, hervey))\nforall x (Flushed(x) and not Dulcify(x, faustine) -> Snarl(x, correna))\nforall x (Overhear(x, correna) -> Hedonic(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) and not Snarl(x, correna) -> not Overhear(x, correna))\n\nDulcify(correna, faustine)\n\nOverhear(correna, faustine) and Overhear(correna, faustine) -> Assisted(correna) -> therefore Assisted(correna) Assisted(correna) and forall x (Assisted(x) -> Snarl(x, faustine)) -> therefore Snarl(correna, faustine) Snarl(correna, faustine) and forall x (Snarl(x, faustine) -> not Dulcify(x, faustine)) -> therefore not Dulcify(correna, faustine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The janie rain the allen. The janie is disjointed. The janie disconnect the taylor. The taylor rain the allen. The taylor is bentonitic. The taylor revive the janie. The allen rain the taylor. If someone is anonymous then they like the allen. If someone rain the allen and they are not disjointed then the allen is not mensural. If someone revive the allen then they do not see the allen. If the taylor rain the allen then the taylor is anonymous. If someone revive the allen and the allen is anonymous then the allen does not see the janie. If someone is mensural and they do not see the allen then they like the taylor. If someone rain the taylor then they are spiritless. If someone is spiritless and they do not like the taylor then they do not eat the taylor. The janie does not like the allen.", "logic": "\nRain(janie, allen)\nDisjointed(janie)\nDisconnect(janie, taylor)\nRain(taylor, allen)\nBentonitic(taylor)\nRevive(taylor, janie)\nRain(allen, taylor)\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Revive(x, allen))\nforall x (Rain(x, allen) and not Disjointed(x) -> not Mensural(allen))\nforall x (Revive(x, allen) -> not Disconnect(x, allen))\nRain(taylor, allen) -> Anonymous(taylor)\nforall x (Revive(x, allen) and Anonymous(allen) -> not Disconnect(allen, janie))\nforall x (Mensural(x) and not Disconnect(x, allen) -> Revive(x, taylor))\nforall x (Rain(x, taylor) -> Spiritless(x))\nforall x (Spiritless(x) and not Revive(x, taylor) -> not Rain(x, taylor))\n\nnot Revive(janie, allen)\n\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Revive(x, allen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The roxane ladle the matilde. The roxane is proper. The roxane glamour the gerrit. The gerrit ladle the matilde. The gerrit is dreaded. The gerrit rook the roxane. The matilde ladle the gerrit. If someone is spacy then they like the matilde. If someone ladle the matilde and they are not proper then the matilde is not clawlike. If someone rook the matilde then they do not see the matilde. If the gerrit ladle the matilde then the gerrit is spacy. If someone rook the matilde and the matilde is spacy then the matilde does not see the roxane. If someone is clawlike and they do not see the matilde then they like the gerrit. If someone ladle the gerrit then they are untanned. If someone is untanned and they do not like the gerrit then they do not eat the gerrit. The gerrit is untanned.", "logic": "\nLadle(roxane, matilde)\nProper(roxane)\nGlamour(roxane, gerrit)\nLadle(gerrit, matilde)\nDreaded(gerrit)\nRook(gerrit, roxane)\nLadle(matilde, gerrit)\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> Rook(x, matilde))\nforall x (Ladle(x, matilde) and not Proper(x) -> not Clawlike(matilde))\nforall x (Rook(x, matilde) -> not Glamour(x, matilde))\nLadle(gerrit, matilde) -> Spacy(gerrit)\nforall x (Rook(x, matilde) and Spacy(matilde) -> not Glamour(matilde, roxane))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and not Glamour(x, matilde) -> Rook(x, gerrit))\nforall x (Ladle(x, gerrit) -> Untanned(x))\nforall x (Untanned(x) and not Rook(x, gerrit) -> not Ladle(x, gerrit))\n\nUntanned(gerrit)\n\nforall x (Ladle(x, gerrit) -> Untanned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The markus twill the chariot. The markus is insouciant. The markus occur the ricard. The ricard twill the chariot. The ricard is backmost. The ricard inhabit the markus. The chariot twill the ricard. If someone is remaining then they like the chariot. If someone twill the chariot and they are not insouciant then the chariot is not divine. If someone inhabit the chariot then they do not see the chariot. If the ricard twill the chariot then the ricard is remaining. If someone inhabit the chariot and the chariot is remaining then the chariot does not see the markus. If someone is divine and they do not see the chariot then they like the ricard. If someone twill the ricard then they are dolabrate. If someone is dolabrate and they do not like the ricard then they do not eat the ricard. The ricard does not like the ricard.", "logic": "\nTwill(markus, chariot)\nInsouciant(markus)\nOccur(markus, ricard)\nTwill(ricard, chariot)\nBackmost(ricard)\nInhabit(ricard, markus)\nTwill(chariot, ricard)\nforall x (Remaining(x) -> Inhabit(x, chariot))\nforall x (Twill(x, chariot) and not Insouciant(x) -> not Divine(chariot))\nforall x (Inhabit(x, chariot) -> not Occur(x, chariot))\nTwill(ricard, chariot) -> Remaining(ricard)\nforall x (Inhabit(x, chariot) and Remaining(chariot) -> not Occur(chariot, markus))\nforall x (Divine(x) and not Occur(x, chariot) -> Inhabit(x, ricard))\nforall x (Twill(x, ricard) -> Dolabrate(x))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) and not Inhabit(x, ricard) -> not Twill(x, ricard))\n\nnot Inhabit(ricard, ricard)\n\nforall x (Divine(x) and not Occur(x, chariot) -> Inhabit(x, ricard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The tiphany eyeball the tome. The tiphany is undatable. The tiphany exsert the diego. The diego eyeball the tome. The diego is manageable. The diego squeegee the tiphany. The tome eyeball the diego. If someone is unleavened then they like the tome. If someone eyeball the tome and they are not undatable then the tome is not pacific. If someone squeegee the tome then they do not see the tome. If the diego eyeball the tome then the diego is unleavened. If someone squeegee the tome and the tome is unleavened then the tome does not see the tiphany. If someone is pacific and they do not see the tome then they like the diego. If someone eyeball the diego then they are blotchy. If someone is blotchy and they do not like the diego then they do not eat the diego. The tome squeegee the tome.", "logic": "\nEyeball(tiphany, tome)\nUndatable(tiphany)\nExsert(tiphany, diego)\nEyeball(diego, tome)\nManageable(diego)\nSqueegee(diego, tiphany)\nEyeball(tome, diego)\nforall x (Unleavened(x) -> Squeegee(x, tome))\nforall x (Eyeball(x, tome) and not Undatable(x) -> not Pacific(tome))\nforall x (Squeegee(x, tome) -> not Exsert(x, tome))\nEyeball(diego, tome) -> Unleavened(diego)\nforall x (Squeegee(x, tome) and Unleavened(tome) -> not Exsert(tome, tiphany))\nforall x (Pacific(x) and not Exsert(x, tome) -> Squeegee(x, diego))\nforall x (Eyeball(x, diego) -> Blotchy(x))\nforall x (Blotchy(x) and not Squeegee(x, diego) -> not Eyeball(x, diego))\n\nSqueegee(tome, tome)\n\nforall x (Unleavened(x) -> Squeegee(x, tome)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The seana clip the ferdie. The seana is avascular. The seana inhere the mic. The mic clip the ferdie. The mic is adoptive. The mic forearm the seana. The ferdie clip the mic. If someone is deviant then they like the ferdie. If someone clip the ferdie and they are not avascular then the ferdie is not ceilinged. If someone forearm the ferdie then they do not see the ferdie. If the mic clip the ferdie then the mic is deviant. If someone forearm the ferdie and the ferdie is deviant then the ferdie does not see the seana. If someone is ceilinged and they do not see the ferdie then they like the mic. If someone clip the mic then they are homocyclic. If someone is homocyclic and they do not like the mic then they do not eat the mic. The mic does not eat the mic.", "logic": "\nClip(seana, ferdie)\nAvascular(seana)\nInhere(seana, mic)\nClip(mic, ferdie)\nAdoptive(mic)\nForearm(mic, seana)\nClip(ferdie, mic)\nforall x (Deviant(x) -> Forearm(x, ferdie))\nforall x (Clip(x, ferdie) and not Avascular(x) -> not Ceilinged(ferdie))\nforall x (Forearm(x, ferdie) -> not Inhere(x, ferdie))\nClip(mic, ferdie) -> Deviant(mic)\nforall x (Forearm(x, ferdie) and Deviant(ferdie) -> not Inhere(ferdie, seana))\nforall x (Ceilinged(x) and not Inhere(x, ferdie) -> Forearm(x, mic))\nforall x (Clip(x, mic) -> Homocyclic(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and not Forearm(x, mic) -> not Clip(x, mic))\n\nnot Clip(mic, mic)\n\nnot Clip(mic, mic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The cloe doss the nelia. The cloe is toothy. The cloe localize the fowler. The fowler doss the nelia. The fowler is accoutred. The fowler charter the cloe. The nelia doss the fowler. If someone is redundant then they like the nelia. If someone doss the nelia and they are not toothy then the nelia is not capsular. If someone charter the nelia then they do not see the nelia. If the fowler doss the nelia then the fowler is redundant. If someone charter the nelia and the nelia is redundant then the nelia does not see the cloe. If someone is capsular and they do not see the nelia then they like the fowler. If someone doss the fowler then they are airheaded. If someone is airheaded and they do not like the fowler then they do not eat the fowler. The nelia doss the cloe.", "logic": "\nDoss(cloe, nelia)\nToothy(cloe)\nLocalize(cloe, fowler)\nDoss(fowler, nelia)\nAccoutred(fowler)\nCharter(fowler, cloe)\nDoss(nelia, fowler)\nforall x (Redundant(x) -> Charter(x, nelia))\nforall x (Doss(x, nelia) and not Toothy(x) -> not Capsular(nelia))\nforall x (Charter(x, nelia) -> not Localize(x, nelia))\nDoss(fowler, nelia) -> Redundant(fowler)\nforall x (Charter(x, nelia) and Redundant(nelia) -> not Localize(nelia, cloe))\nforall x (Capsular(x) and not Localize(x, nelia) -> Charter(x, fowler))\nforall x (Doss(x, fowler) -> Airheaded(x))\nforall x (Airheaded(x) and not Charter(x, fowler) -> not Doss(x, fowler))\n\nDoss(nelia, cloe)\n\nDoss(nelia, cloe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The yolanthe disinherit the deana. The yolanthe is afeard. The yolanthe lithograph the jada. The jada disinherit the deana. The jada is subtropic. The jada babble the yolanthe. The deana disinherit the jada. If someone is partial then they like the deana. If someone disinherit the deana and they are not afeard then the deana is not inborn. If someone babble the deana then they do not see the deana. If the jada disinherit the deana then the jada is partial. If someone babble the deana and the deana is partial then the deana does not see the yolanthe. If someone is inborn and they do not see the deana then they like the jada. If someone disinherit the jada then they are median. If someone is median and they do not like the jada then they do not eat the jada. The yolanthe does not like the yolanthe.", "logic": "\nDisinherit(yolanthe, deana)\nAfeard(yolanthe)\nLithograph(yolanthe, jada)\nDisinherit(jada, deana)\nSubtropic(jada)\nBabble(jada, yolanthe)\nDisinherit(deana, jada)\nforall x (Partial(x) -> Babble(x, deana))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, deana) and not Afeard(x) -> not Inborn(deana))\nforall x (Babble(x, deana) -> not Lithograph(x, deana))\nDisinherit(jada, deana) -> Partial(jada)\nforall x (Babble(x, deana) and Partial(deana) -> not Lithograph(deana, yolanthe))\nforall x (Inborn(x) and not Lithograph(x, deana) -> Babble(x, jada))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, jada) -> Median(x))\nforall x (Median(x) and not Babble(x, jada) -> not Disinherit(x, jada))\n\nnot Babble(yolanthe, yolanthe)\n\nnot Babble(yolanthe, yolanthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The pavel despise the virginia. The pavel is titled. The pavel finance the rik. The rik despise the virginia. The rik is flustered. The rik clamor the pavel. The virginia despise the rik. If someone is colossal then they like the virginia. If someone despise the virginia and they are not titled then the virginia is not oleophobic. If someone clamor the virginia then they do not see the virginia. If the rik despise the virginia then the rik is colossal. If someone clamor the virginia and the virginia is colossal then the virginia does not see the pavel. If someone is oleophobic and they do not see the virginia then they like the rik. If someone despise the rik then they are exuvial. If someone is exuvial and they do not like the rik then they do not eat the rik. The rik is titled.", "logic": "\nDespise(pavel, virginia)\nTitled(pavel)\nFinance(pavel, rik)\nDespise(rik, virginia)\nFlustered(rik)\nClamor(rik, pavel)\nDespise(virginia, rik)\nforall x (Colossal(x) -> Clamor(x, virginia))\nforall x (Despise(x, virginia) and not Titled(x) -> not Oleophobic(virginia))\nforall x (Clamor(x, virginia) -> not Finance(x, virginia))\nDespise(rik, virginia) -> Colossal(rik)\nforall x (Clamor(x, virginia) and Colossal(virginia) -> not Finance(virginia, pavel))\nforall x (Oleophobic(x) and not Finance(x, virginia) -> Clamor(x, rik))\nforall x (Despise(x, rik) -> Exuvial(x))\nforall x (Exuvial(x) and not Clamor(x, rik) -> not Despise(x, rik))\n\nTitled(rik)\n\nTitled(rik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "Leorah is not customary. Leorah is threatened. Leorah is unwilling. Leorah is emended. Marcellus is demode. Marcellus is customary. Marcellus is unwilling. Brunhilda is not demode. Brunhilda is not threatened. Brunhilda is unwilling. Brunhilda is emended. Heide is customary. Heide is not unwilling. Heide is frightened. Heide is emended. If someone is laudatory and frightened then they are threatened. If someone is emended and not unwilling then they are threatened. If someone is customary and demode then they are threatened. If someone is customary and not demode then they are not frightened. Kind, unwilling people are frightened. All frightened, unwilling people are emended. All frightened people are emended. If someone is customary and emended then they are laudatory. Heide is customary.", "logic": "\nnot Customary(leorah)\nThreatened(leorah)\nUnwilling(leorah)\nEmended(leorah)\nDemode(marcellus)\nCustomary(marcellus)\nUnwilling(marcellus)\nnot Demode(brunhilda)\nnot Threatened(brunhilda)\nUnwilling(brunhilda)\nEmended(brunhilda)\nCustomary(heide)\nnot Unwilling(heide)\nFrightened(heide)\nEmended(heide)\nforall x (Laudatory(x) and Frightened(x) -> Threatened(x))\nforall x (Emended(x) and not Unwilling(x) -> Threatened(x))\nforall x (Customary(x) and Demode(x) -> Threatened(x))\nforall x (Customary(x) and not Demode(x) -> not Frightened(x))\nforall x (Threatened(x) and Unwilling(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Frightened(x) and Unwilling(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Customary(x) and Emended(x) -> Laudatory(x))\n\nCustomary(heide)\n\ntherefore Customary(heide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Stephie is not counter. Stephie is paroxysmal. Stephie is clannish. Stephie is unsung. Sandi is undefeated. Sandi is counter. Sandi is clannish. Talya is not undefeated. Talya is not paroxysmal. Talya is clannish. Talya is unsung. Dillon is counter. Dillon is not clannish. Dillon is imaginary. Dillon is unsung. If someone is thumbed and imaginary then they are paroxysmal. If someone is unsung and not clannish then they are paroxysmal. If someone is counter and undefeated then they are paroxysmal. If someone is counter and not undefeated then they are not imaginary. Kind, clannish people are imaginary. All imaginary, clannish people are unsung. All imaginary people are unsung. If someone is counter and unsung then they are thumbed. Dillon is not imaginary.", "logic": "\nnot Counter(stephie)\nParoxysmal(stephie)\nClannish(stephie)\nUnsung(stephie)\nUndefeated(sandi)\nCounter(sandi)\nClannish(sandi)\nnot Undefeated(talya)\nnot Paroxysmal(talya)\nClannish(talya)\nUnsung(talya)\nCounter(dillon)\nnot Clannish(dillon)\nImaginary(dillon)\nUnsung(dillon)\nforall x (Thumbed(x) and Imaginary(x) -> Paroxysmal(x))\nforall x (Unsung(x) and not Clannish(x) -> Paroxysmal(x))\nforall x (Counter(x) and Undefeated(x) -> Paroxysmal(x))\nforall x (Counter(x) and not Undefeated(x) -> not Imaginary(x))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) and Clannish(x) -> Imaginary(x))\nforall x (Imaginary(x) and Clannish(x) -> Unsung(x))\nforall x (Imaginary(x) -> Unsung(x))\nforall x (Counter(x) and Unsung(x) -> Thumbed(x))\n\nnot Imaginary(dillon)\n\ntherefore Imaginary(dillon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Ida is not hirsute. Ida is allelic. Ida is reckless. Ida is dispensed. Kelley is borated. Kelley is hirsute. Kelley is reckless. Melissa is not borated. Melissa is not allelic. Melissa is reckless. Melissa is dispensed. Shelbi is hirsute. Shelbi is not reckless. Shelbi is pitiful. Shelbi is dispensed. If someone is rebellious and pitiful then they are allelic. If someone is dispensed and not reckless then they are allelic. If someone is hirsute and borated then they are allelic. If someone is hirsute and not borated then they are not pitiful. Kind, reckless people are pitiful. All pitiful, reckless people are dispensed. All pitiful people are dispensed. If someone is hirsute and dispensed then they are rebellious. Shelbi is rebellious.", "logic": "\nnot Hirsute(ida)\nAllelic(ida)\nReckless(ida)\nDispensed(ida)\nBorated(kelley)\nHirsute(kelley)\nReckless(kelley)\nnot Borated(melissa)\nnot Allelic(melissa)\nReckless(melissa)\nDispensed(melissa)\nHirsute(shelbi)\nnot Reckless(shelbi)\nPitiful(shelbi)\nDispensed(shelbi)\nforall x (Rebellious(x) and Pitiful(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Dispensed(x) and not Reckless(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) and Borated(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) and not Borated(x) -> not Pitiful(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) and Reckless(x) -> Pitiful(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) and Reckless(x) -> Dispensed(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> Dispensed(x))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) and Dispensed(x) -> Rebellious(x))\n\nRebellious(shelbi)\n\nHirsute(shelbi) and Dispensed(shelbi) and forall x (Hirsute(x) and Dispensed(x) -> Rebellious(x)) -> therefore Rebellious(shelbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Allah is not semiopaque. Allah is close. Allah is dominical. Allah is overmuch. Octavia is rummy. Octavia is semiopaque. Octavia is dominical. Ajay is not rummy. Ajay is not close. Ajay is dominical. Ajay is overmuch. Ikey is semiopaque. Ikey is not dominical. Ikey is fatty. Ikey is overmuch. If someone is sometime and fatty then they are close. If someone is overmuch and not dominical then they are close. If someone is semiopaque and rummy then they are close. If someone is semiopaque and not rummy then they are not fatty. Kind, dominical people are fatty. All fatty, dominical people are overmuch. All fatty people are overmuch. If someone is semiopaque and overmuch then they are sometime. Allah is not fatty.", "logic": "\nnot Semiopaque(allah)\nClose(allah)\nDominical(allah)\nOvermuch(allah)\nRummy(octavia)\nSemiopaque(octavia)\nDominical(octavia)\nnot Rummy(ajay)\nnot Close(ajay)\nDominical(ajay)\nOvermuch(ajay)\nSemiopaque(ikey)\nnot Dominical(ikey)\nFatty(ikey)\nOvermuch(ikey)\nforall x (Sometime(x) and Fatty(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Overmuch(x) and not Dominical(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Semiopaque(x) and Rummy(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Semiopaque(x) and not Rummy(x) -> not Fatty(x))\nforall x (Close(x) and Dominical(x) -> Fatty(x))\nforall x (Fatty(x) and Dominical(x) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Fatty(x) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Semiopaque(x) and Overmuch(x) -> Sometime(x))\n\nnot Fatty(allah)\n\nClose(allah) and Dominical(allah) and forall x (Close(x) and Dominical(x) -> Fatty(x)) -> therefore Fatty(allah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Theada is not unfocused. Theada is knifelike. Theada is paperlike. Theada is bloody. Pate is debased. Pate is unfocused. Pate is paperlike. Odella is not debased. Odella is not knifelike. Odella is paperlike. Odella is bloody. Emelita is unfocused. Emelita is not paperlike. Emelita is motionless. Emelita is bloody. If someone is lucid and motionless then they are knifelike. If someone is bloody and not paperlike then they are knifelike. If someone is unfocused and debased then they are knifelike. If someone is unfocused and not debased then they are not motionless. Kind, paperlike people are motionless. All motionless, paperlike people are bloody. All motionless people are bloody. If someone is unfocused and bloody then they are lucid. Pate is motionless.", "logic": "\nnot Unfocused(theada)\nKnifelike(theada)\nPaperlike(theada)\nBloody(theada)\nDebased(pate)\nUnfocused(pate)\nPaperlike(pate)\nnot Debased(odella)\nnot Knifelike(odella)\nPaperlike(odella)\nBloody(odella)\nUnfocused(emelita)\nnot Paperlike(emelita)\nMotionless(emelita)\nBloody(emelita)\nforall x (Lucid(x) and Motionless(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and not Paperlike(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Debased(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and not Debased(x) -> not Motionless(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) and Paperlike(x) -> Motionless(x))\nforall x (Motionless(x) and Paperlike(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Motionless(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Bloody(x) -> Lucid(x))\n\nMotionless(pate)\n\nUnfocused(pate) and Debased(pate) and forall x (Unfocused(x) and Debased(x) -> Knifelike(x)) -> therefore Knifelike(pate) Knifelike(pate) and Paperlike(pate) and forall x (Knifelike(x) and Paperlike(x) -> Motionless(x)) -> therefore Motionless(pate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Clara is not eupnoeic. Clara is moved. Clara is literary. Clara is demoniacal. Felipa is usual. Felipa is eupnoeic. Felipa is literary. Daune is not usual. Daune is not moved. Daune is literary. Daune is demoniacal. Xylia is eupnoeic. Xylia is not literary. Xylia is peckish. Xylia is demoniacal. If someone is lacelike and peckish then they are moved. If someone is demoniacal and not literary then they are moved. If someone is eupnoeic and usual then they are moved. If someone is eupnoeic and not usual then they are not peckish. Kind, literary people are peckish. All peckish, literary people are demoniacal. All peckish people are demoniacal. If someone is eupnoeic and demoniacal then they are lacelike. Felipa is not peckish.", "logic": "\nnot Eupnoeic(clara)\nMoved(clara)\nLiterary(clara)\nDemoniacal(clara)\nUsual(felipa)\nEupnoeic(felipa)\nLiterary(felipa)\nnot Usual(daune)\nnot Moved(daune)\nLiterary(daune)\nDemoniacal(daune)\nEupnoeic(xylia)\nnot Literary(xylia)\nPeckish(xylia)\nDemoniacal(xylia)\nforall x (Lacelike(x) and Peckish(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) and not Literary(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) and Usual(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) and not Usual(x) -> not Peckish(x))\nforall x (Moved(x) and Literary(x) -> Peckish(x))\nforall x (Peckish(x) and Literary(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Peckish(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) and Demoniacal(x) -> Lacelike(x))\n\nnot Peckish(felipa)\n\nEupnoeic(felipa) and Usual(felipa) and forall x (Eupnoeic(x) and Usual(x) -> Moved(x)) -> therefore Moved(felipa) Moved(felipa) and Literary(felipa) and forall x (Moved(x) and Literary(x) -> Peckish(x)) -> therefore Peckish(felipa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Loleta is not bareheaded. Loleta is articled. Loleta is sensed. Loleta is pauline. Madalyn is fore. Madalyn is bareheaded. Madalyn is sensed. Lura is not fore. Lura is not articled. Lura is sensed. Lura is pauline. Clotilda is bareheaded. Clotilda is not sensed. Clotilda is glycogenic. Clotilda is pauline. If someone is spooky and glycogenic then they are articled. If someone is pauline and not sensed then they are articled. If someone is bareheaded and fore then they are articled. If someone is bareheaded and not fore then they are not glycogenic. Kind, sensed people are glycogenic. All glycogenic, sensed people are pauline. All glycogenic people are pauline. If someone is bareheaded and pauline then they are spooky. Madalyn is pauline.", "logic": "\nnot Bareheaded(loleta)\nArticled(loleta)\nSensed(loleta)\nPauline(loleta)\nFore(madalyn)\nBareheaded(madalyn)\nSensed(madalyn)\nnot Fore(lura)\nnot Articled(lura)\nSensed(lura)\nPauline(lura)\nBareheaded(clotilda)\nnot Sensed(clotilda)\nGlycogenic(clotilda)\nPauline(clotilda)\nforall x (Spooky(x) and Glycogenic(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Pauline(x) and not Sensed(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) and Fore(x) -> Articled(x))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) and not Fore(x) -> not Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) and Sensed(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) and Sensed(x) -> Pauline(x))\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) -> Pauline(x))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) and Pauline(x) -> Spooky(x))\n\nPauline(madalyn)\n\nBareheaded(madalyn) and Fore(madalyn) and forall x (Bareheaded(x) and Fore(x) -> Articled(x)) -> therefore Articled(madalyn) Articled(madalyn) and Sensed(madalyn) and forall x (Articled(x) and Sensed(x) -> Glycogenic(x)) -> therefore Glycogenic(madalyn) Glycogenic(madalyn) and forall x (Glycogenic(x) -> Pauline(x)) -> therefore Pauline(madalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Alena is not imitative. Alena is parted. Alena is aflame. Alena is haggard. Barry is dyspnoeic. Barry is imitative. Barry is aflame. Mick is not dyspnoeic. Mick is not parted. Mick is aflame. Mick is haggard. Gabbi is imitative. Gabbi is not aflame. Gabbi is laureled. Gabbi is haggard. If someone is unreleased and laureled then they are parted. If someone is haggard and not aflame then they are parted. If someone is imitative and dyspnoeic then they are parted. If someone is imitative and not dyspnoeic then they are not laureled. Kind, aflame people are laureled. All laureled, aflame people are haggard. All laureled people are haggard. If someone is imitative and haggard then they are unreleased. Barry is not haggard.", "logic": "\nnot Imitative(alena)\nParted(alena)\nAflame(alena)\nHaggard(alena)\nDyspnoeic(barry)\nImitative(barry)\nAflame(barry)\nnot Dyspnoeic(mick)\nnot Parted(mick)\nAflame(mick)\nHaggard(mick)\nImitative(gabbi)\nnot Aflame(gabbi)\nLaureled(gabbi)\nHaggard(gabbi)\nforall x (Unreleased(x) and Laureled(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Haggard(x) and not Aflame(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Imitative(x) and Dyspnoeic(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Imitative(x) and not Dyspnoeic(x) -> not Laureled(x))\nforall x (Parted(x) and Aflame(x) -> Laureled(x))\nforall x (Laureled(x) and Aflame(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Laureled(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Imitative(x) and Haggard(x) -> Unreleased(x))\n\nnot Haggard(barry)\n\nImitative(barry) and Dyspnoeic(barry) and forall x (Imitative(x) and Dyspnoeic(x) -> Parted(x)) -> therefore Parted(barry) Parted(barry) and Aflame(barry) and forall x (Parted(x) and Aflame(x) -> Laureled(x)) -> therefore Laureled(barry) Laureled(barry) and forall x (Laureled(x) -> Haggard(x)) -> therefore Haggard(barry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Kimmo is not mesodermal. Kimmo is disdainful. Kimmo is irate. Kimmo is adagio. Shanon is censorial. Shanon is mesodermal. Shanon is irate. Rowena is not censorial. Rowena is not disdainful. Rowena is irate. Rowena is adagio. Gerianne is mesodermal. Gerianne is not irate. Gerianne is misty. Gerianne is adagio. If someone is slavic and misty then they are disdainful. If someone is adagio and not irate then they are disdainful. If someone is mesodermal and censorial then they are disdainful. If someone is mesodermal and not censorial then they are not misty. Kind, irate people are misty. All misty, irate people are adagio. All misty people are adagio. If someone is mesodermal and adagio then they are slavic. Rowena is not misty.", "logic": "\nnot Mesodermal(kimmo)\nDisdainful(kimmo)\nIrate(kimmo)\nAdagio(kimmo)\nCensorial(shanon)\nMesodermal(shanon)\nIrate(shanon)\nnot Censorial(rowena)\nnot Disdainful(rowena)\nIrate(rowena)\nAdagio(rowena)\nMesodermal(gerianne)\nnot Irate(gerianne)\nMisty(gerianne)\nAdagio(gerianne)\nforall x (Slavic(x) and Misty(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Adagio(x) and not Irate(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Censorial(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and not Censorial(x) -> not Misty(x))\nforall x (Disdainful(x) and Irate(x) -> Misty(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) and Irate(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Adagio(x) -> Slavic(x))\n\nnot Misty(rowena)\n\nforall x (Disdainful(x) and Irate(x) -> Misty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Wes is not hornlike. Wes is optimal. Wes is wary. Wes is agrypnotic. Lilly is spheric. Lilly is hornlike. Lilly is wary. Hamel is not spheric. Hamel is not optimal. Hamel is wary. Hamel is agrypnotic. Pru is hornlike. Pru is not wary. Pru is above. Pru is agrypnotic. If someone is scaleless and above then they are optimal. If someone is agrypnotic and not wary then they are optimal. If someone is hornlike and spheric then they are optimal. If someone is hornlike and not spheric then they are not above. Kind, wary people are above. All above, wary people are agrypnotic. All above people are agrypnotic. If someone is hornlike and agrypnotic then they are scaleless. Wes is scaleless.", "logic": "\nnot Hornlike(wes)\nOptimal(wes)\nWary(wes)\nAgrypnotic(wes)\nSpheric(lilly)\nHornlike(lilly)\nWary(lilly)\nnot Spheric(hamel)\nnot Optimal(hamel)\nWary(hamel)\nAgrypnotic(hamel)\nHornlike(pru)\nnot Wary(pru)\nAbove(pru)\nAgrypnotic(pru)\nforall x (Scaleless(x) and Above(x) -> Optimal(x))\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) and not Wary(x) -> Optimal(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) and Spheric(x) -> Optimal(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) and not Spheric(x) -> not Above(x))\nforall x (Optimal(x) and Wary(x) -> Above(x))\nforall x (Above(x) and Wary(x) -> Agrypnotic(x))\nforall x (Above(x) -> Agrypnotic(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) and Agrypnotic(x) -> Scaleless(x))\n\nScaleless(wes)\n\nforall x (Hornlike(x) and Agrypnotic(x) -> Scaleless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Clayton is not ulterior. Clayton is occupied. Clayton is bulgarian. Clayton is mandatory. Sim is reserved. Sim is ulterior. Sim is bulgarian. Rosanna is not reserved. Rosanna is not occupied. Rosanna is bulgarian. Rosanna is mandatory. Cybal is ulterior. Cybal is not bulgarian. Cybal is fewest. Cybal is mandatory. If someone is inviolable and fewest then they are occupied. If someone is mandatory and not bulgarian then they are occupied. If someone is ulterior and reserved then they are occupied. If someone is ulterior and not reserved then they are not fewest. Kind, bulgarian people are fewest. All fewest, bulgarian people are mandatory. All fewest people are mandatory. If someone is ulterior and mandatory then they are inviolable. Rosanna is not inviolable.", "logic": "\nnot Ulterior(clayton)\nOccupied(clayton)\nBulgarian(clayton)\nMandatory(clayton)\nReserved(sim)\nUlterior(sim)\nBulgarian(sim)\nnot Reserved(rosanna)\nnot Occupied(rosanna)\nBulgarian(rosanna)\nMandatory(rosanna)\nUlterior(cybal)\nnot Bulgarian(cybal)\nFewest(cybal)\nMandatory(cybal)\nforall x (Inviolable(x) and Fewest(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) and not Bulgarian(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and Reserved(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and not Reserved(x) -> not Fewest(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) and Bulgarian(x) -> Fewest(x))\nforall x (Fewest(x) and Bulgarian(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nforall x (Fewest(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Inviolable(x))\n\nnot Inviolable(rosanna)\n\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Inviolable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Aldo is not improving. Aldo is fossilized. Aldo is arctic. Aldo is unborn. Maurise is recovering. Maurise is improving. Maurise is arctic. Corwin is not recovering. Corwin is not fossilized. Corwin is arctic. Corwin is unborn. Ardella is improving. Ardella is not arctic. Ardella is fireproof. Ardella is unborn. If someone is manichee and fireproof then they are fossilized. If someone is unborn and not arctic then they are fossilized. If someone is improving and recovering then they are fossilized. If someone is improving and not recovering then they are not fireproof. Kind, arctic people are fireproof. All fireproof, arctic people are unborn. All fireproof people are unborn. If someone is improving and unborn then they are manichee. Aldo is recovering.", "logic": "\nnot Improving(aldo)\nFossilized(aldo)\nArctic(aldo)\nUnborn(aldo)\nRecovering(maurise)\nImproving(maurise)\nArctic(maurise)\nnot Recovering(corwin)\nnot Fossilized(corwin)\nArctic(corwin)\nUnborn(corwin)\nImproving(ardella)\nnot Arctic(ardella)\nFireproof(ardella)\nUnborn(ardella)\nforall x (Manichee(x) and Fireproof(x) -> Fossilized(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) and not Arctic(x) -> Fossilized(x))\nforall x (Improving(x) and Recovering(x) -> Fossilized(x))\nforall x (Improving(x) and not Recovering(x) -> not Fireproof(x))\nforall x (Fossilized(x) and Arctic(x) -> Fireproof(x))\nforall x (Fireproof(x) and Arctic(x) -> Unborn(x))\nforall x (Fireproof(x) -> Unborn(x))\nforall x (Improving(x) and Unborn(x) -> Manichee(x))\n\nRecovering(aldo)\n\nRecovering(aldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Ofella is not dignifying. Ofella is devotional. Ofella is raucous. Ofella is ukrainian. Dierdre is emphasised. Dierdre is dignifying. Dierdre is raucous. Ardelia is not emphasised. Ardelia is not devotional. Ardelia is raucous. Ardelia is ukrainian. William is dignifying. William is not raucous. William is bacchanal. William is ukrainian. If someone is sodden and bacchanal then they are devotional. If someone is ukrainian and not raucous then they are devotional. If someone is dignifying and emphasised then they are devotional. If someone is dignifying and not emphasised then they are not bacchanal. Kind, raucous people are bacchanal. All bacchanal, raucous people are ukrainian. All bacchanal people are ukrainian. If someone is dignifying and ukrainian then they are sodden. William is not emphasised.", "logic": "\nnot Dignifying(ofella)\nDevotional(ofella)\nRaucous(ofella)\nUkrainian(ofella)\nEmphasised(dierdre)\nDignifying(dierdre)\nRaucous(dierdre)\nnot Emphasised(ardelia)\nnot Devotional(ardelia)\nRaucous(ardelia)\nUkrainian(ardelia)\nDignifying(william)\nnot Raucous(william)\nBacchanal(william)\nUkrainian(william)\nforall x (Sodden(x) and Bacchanal(x) -> Devotional(x))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) and not Raucous(x) -> Devotional(x))\nforall x (Dignifying(x) and Emphasised(x) -> Devotional(x))\nforall x (Dignifying(x) and not Emphasised(x) -> not Bacchanal(x))\nforall x (Devotional(x) and Raucous(x) -> Bacchanal(x))\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) and Raucous(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Dignifying(x) and Ukrainian(x) -> Sodden(x))\n\nnot Emphasised(william)\n\nnot Emphasised(william) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Zenia is not ungulate. Zenia is shrimpy. Zenia is pedate. Zenia is unicuspid. Ebenezer is executable. Ebenezer is ungulate. Ebenezer is pedate. Alaine is not executable. Alaine is not shrimpy. Alaine is pedate. Alaine is unicuspid. Amory is ungulate. Amory is not pedate. Amory is discrete. Amory is unicuspid. If someone is sunrise and discrete then they are shrimpy. If someone is unicuspid and not pedate then they are shrimpy. If someone is ungulate and executable then they are shrimpy. If someone is ungulate and not executable then they are not discrete. Kind, pedate people are discrete. All discrete, pedate people are unicuspid. All discrete people are unicuspid. If someone is ungulate and unicuspid then they are sunrise. Alaine is ungulate.", "logic": "\nnot Ungulate(zenia)\nShrimpy(zenia)\nPedate(zenia)\nUnicuspid(zenia)\nExecutable(ebenezer)\nUngulate(ebenezer)\nPedate(ebenezer)\nnot Executable(alaine)\nnot Shrimpy(alaine)\nPedate(alaine)\nUnicuspid(alaine)\nUngulate(amory)\nnot Pedate(amory)\nDiscrete(amory)\nUnicuspid(amory)\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Discrete(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) and not Pedate(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and Executable(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and not Executable(x) -> not Discrete(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) and Pedate(x) -> Discrete(x))\nforall x (Discrete(x) and Pedate(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Discrete(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and Unicuspid(x) -> Sunrise(x))\n\nUngulate(alaine)\n\nUngulate(alaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The stanleigh slough the korrie. The stanleigh is hornlike. The stanleigh is sheathed. The stanleigh emend the korrie. The stanleigh emend the brunhilde. The stanleigh script the korrie. The stanleigh script the brunhilde. The korrie is hornlike. The korrie script the stanleigh. The brunhilde slough the stanleigh. If someone slough the brunhilde then they see the brunhilde. If someone emend the stanleigh then the stanleigh is beaked. If someone script the stanleigh and they eat the korrie then they like the korrie. If someone slough the stanleigh then they like the stanleigh. If the korrie slough the stanleigh and the stanleigh emend the korrie then the korrie script the brunhilde. If someone script the korrie then the korrie emend the stanleigh. If the korrie script the stanleigh and the stanleigh slough the korrie then the stanleigh script the korrie. If someone is beaked then they eat the brunhilde. The stanleigh is hornlike.", "logic": "\nSlough(stanleigh, korrie)\nHornlike(stanleigh)\nSheathed(stanleigh)\nEmend(stanleigh, korrie)\nEmend(stanleigh, brunhilde)\nScript(stanleigh, korrie)\nScript(stanleigh, brunhilde)\nHornlike(korrie)\nScript(korrie, stanleigh)\nSlough(brunhilde, stanleigh)\nforall x (Slough(x, brunhilde) -> Script(x, brunhilde))\nforall x (Emend(x, stanleigh) -> Beaked(stanleigh))\nforall x (Script(x, stanleigh) and Slough(x, korrie) -> Emend(x, korrie))\nforall x (Slough(x, stanleigh) -> Emend(x, stanleigh))\nSlough(korrie, stanleigh) and Emend(stanleigh, korrie) -> Script(korrie, brunhilde)\nforall x (Script(x, korrie) -> Emend(korrie, stanleigh))\nScript(korrie, stanleigh) and Slough(stanleigh, korrie) -> Script(stanleigh, korrie)\nforall x (Beaked(x) -> Slough(x, brunhilde))\n\nHornlike(stanleigh)\n\ntherefore Hornlike(stanleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The sara embroider the morissa. The sara is antinomian. The sara is lenten. The sara become the morissa. The sara become the albatros. The sara sign the morissa. The sara sign the albatros. The morissa is antinomian. The morissa sign the sara. The albatros embroider the sara. If someone embroider the albatros then they see the albatros. If someone become the sara then the sara is indian. If someone sign the sara and they eat the morissa then they like the morissa. If someone embroider the sara then they like the sara. If the morissa embroider the sara and the sara become the morissa then the morissa sign the albatros. If someone sign the morissa then the morissa become the sara. If the morissa sign the sara and the sara embroider the morissa then the sara sign the morissa. If someone is indian then they eat the albatros. The sara does not like the morissa.", "logic": "\nEmbroider(sara, morissa)\nAntinomian(sara)\nLenten(sara)\nBecome(sara, morissa)\nBecome(sara, albatros)\nSign(sara, morissa)\nSign(sara, albatros)\nAntinomian(morissa)\nSign(morissa, sara)\nEmbroider(albatros, sara)\nforall x (Embroider(x, albatros) -> Sign(x, albatros))\nforall x (Become(x, sara) -> Indian(sara))\nforall x (Sign(x, sara) and Embroider(x, morissa) -> Become(x, morissa))\nforall x (Embroider(x, sara) -> Become(x, sara))\nEmbroider(morissa, sara) and Become(sara, morissa) -> Sign(morissa, albatros)\nforall x (Sign(x, morissa) -> Become(morissa, sara))\nSign(morissa, sara) and Embroider(sara, morissa) -> Sign(sara, morissa)\nforall x (Indian(x) -> Embroider(x, albatros))\n\nnot Become(sara, morissa)\n\ntherefore Become(sara, morissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The stanleigh burr the ertha. The stanleigh is wobbling. The stanleigh is jaggy. The stanleigh encircle the ertha. The stanleigh encircle the gifford. The stanleigh neck the ertha. The stanleigh neck the gifford. The ertha is wobbling. The ertha neck the stanleigh. The gifford burr the stanleigh. If someone burr the gifford then they see the gifford. If someone encircle the stanleigh then the stanleigh is unsaved. If someone neck the stanleigh and they eat the ertha then they like the ertha. If someone burr the stanleigh then they like the stanleigh. If the ertha burr the stanleigh and the stanleigh encircle the ertha then the ertha neck the gifford. If someone neck the ertha then the ertha encircle the stanleigh. If the ertha neck the stanleigh and the stanleigh burr the ertha then the stanleigh neck the ertha. If someone is unsaved then they eat the gifford. The ertha encircle the stanleigh.", "logic": "\nBurr(stanleigh, ertha)\nWobbling(stanleigh)\nJaggy(stanleigh)\nEncircle(stanleigh, ertha)\nEncircle(stanleigh, gifford)\nNeck(stanleigh, ertha)\nNeck(stanleigh, gifford)\nWobbling(ertha)\nNeck(ertha, stanleigh)\nBurr(gifford, stanleigh)\nforall x (Burr(x, gifford) -> Neck(x, gifford))\nforall x (Encircle(x, stanleigh) -> Unsaved(stanleigh))\nforall x (Neck(x, stanleigh) and Burr(x, ertha) -> Encircle(x, ertha))\nforall x (Burr(x, stanleigh) -> Encircle(x, stanleigh))\nBurr(ertha, stanleigh) and Encircle(stanleigh, ertha) -> Neck(ertha, gifford)\nforall x (Neck(x, ertha) -> Encircle(ertha, stanleigh))\nNeck(ertha, stanleigh) and Burr(stanleigh, ertha) -> Neck(stanleigh, ertha)\nforall x (Unsaved(x) -> Burr(x, gifford))\n\nEncircle(ertha, stanleigh)\n\nNeck(stanleigh, ertha) and forall x (Neck(x, ertha) -> Encircle(ertha, stanleigh)) -> therefore Encircle(ertha, stanleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The kaiser gripe the lindy. The kaiser is unveiled. The kaiser is aphonic. The kaiser prosper the lindy. The kaiser prosper the suzi. The kaiser deplumate the lindy. The kaiser deplumate the suzi. The lindy is unveiled. The lindy deplumate the kaiser. The suzi gripe the kaiser. If someone gripe the suzi then they see the suzi. If someone prosper the kaiser then the kaiser is darling. If someone deplumate the kaiser and they eat the lindy then they like the lindy. If someone gripe the kaiser then they like the kaiser. If the lindy gripe the kaiser and the kaiser prosper the lindy then the lindy deplumate the suzi. If someone deplumate the lindy then the lindy prosper the kaiser. If the lindy deplumate the kaiser and the kaiser gripe the lindy then the kaiser deplumate the lindy. If someone is darling then they eat the suzi. The lindy does not like the kaiser.", "logic": "\nGripe(kaiser, lindy)\nUnveiled(kaiser)\nAphonic(kaiser)\nProsper(kaiser, lindy)\nProsper(kaiser, suzi)\nDeplumate(kaiser, lindy)\nDeplumate(kaiser, suzi)\nUnveiled(lindy)\nDeplumate(lindy, kaiser)\nGripe(suzi, kaiser)\nforall x (Gripe(x, suzi) -> Deplumate(x, suzi))\nforall x (Prosper(x, kaiser) -> Darling(kaiser))\nforall x (Deplumate(x, kaiser) and Gripe(x, lindy) -> Prosper(x, lindy))\nforall x (Gripe(x, kaiser) -> Prosper(x, kaiser))\nGripe(lindy, kaiser) and Prosper(kaiser, lindy) -> Deplumate(lindy, suzi)\nforall x (Deplumate(x, lindy) -> Prosper(lindy, kaiser))\nDeplumate(lindy, kaiser) and Gripe(kaiser, lindy) -> Deplumate(kaiser, lindy)\nforall x (Darling(x) -> Gripe(x, suzi))\n\nnot Prosper(lindy, kaiser)\n\nDeplumate(kaiser, lindy) and forall x (Deplumate(x, lindy) -> Prosper(lindy, kaiser)) -> therefore Prosper(lindy, kaiser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The katrinka defecate the maud. The katrinka is oecumenic. The katrinka is transitory. The katrinka shutter the maud. The katrinka shutter the roch. The katrinka asperse the maud. The katrinka asperse the roch. The maud is oecumenic. The maud asperse the katrinka. The roch defecate the katrinka. If someone defecate the roch then they see the roch. If someone shutter the katrinka then the katrinka is caliginous. If someone asperse the katrinka and they eat the maud then they like the maud. If someone defecate the katrinka then they like the katrinka. If the maud defecate the katrinka and the katrinka shutter the maud then the maud asperse the roch. If someone asperse the maud then the maud shutter the katrinka. If the maud asperse the katrinka and the katrinka defecate the maud then the katrinka asperse the maud. If someone is caliginous then they eat the roch. The katrinka is caliginous.", "logic": "\nDefecate(katrinka, maud)\nOecumenic(katrinka)\nTransitory(katrinka)\nShutter(katrinka, maud)\nShutter(katrinka, roch)\nAsperse(katrinka, maud)\nAsperse(katrinka, roch)\nOecumenic(maud)\nAsperse(maud, katrinka)\nDefecate(roch, katrinka)\nforall x (Defecate(x, roch) -> Asperse(x, roch))\nforall x (Shutter(x, katrinka) -> Caliginous(katrinka))\nforall x (Asperse(x, katrinka) and Defecate(x, maud) -> Shutter(x, maud))\nforall x (Defecate(x, katrinka) -> Shutter(x, katrinka))\nDefecate(maud, katrinka) and Shutter(katrinka, maud) -> Asperse(maud, roch)\nforall x (Asperse(x, maud) -> Shutter(maud, katrinka))\nAsperse(maud, katrinka) and Defecate(katrinka, maud) -> Asperse(katrinka, maud)\nforall x (Caliginous(x) -> Defecate(x, roch))\n\nCaliginous(katrinka)\n\nDefecate(roch, katrinka) and forall x (Defecate(x, katrinka) -> Shutter(x, katrinka)) -> therefore Shutter(roch, katrinka) Shutter(roch, katrinka) and forall x (Shutter(x, katrinka) -> Caliginous(katrinka)) -> therefore Caliginous(katrinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The jean enjoin the ingelbert. The jean is potbellied. The jean is organized. The jean embrace the ingelbert. The jean embrace the gifford. The jean depend the ingelbert. The jean depend the gifford. The ingelbert is potbellied. The ingelbert depend the jean. The gifford enjoin the jean. If someone enjoin the gifford then they see the gifford. If someone embrace the jean then the jean is romaic. If someone depend the jean and they eat the ingelbert then they like the ingelbert. If someone enjoin the jean then they like the jean. If the ingelbert enjoin the jean and the jean embrace the ingelbert then the ingelbert depend the gifford. If someone depend the ingelbert then the ingelbert embrace the jean. If the ingelbert depend the jean and the jean enjoin the ingelbert then the jean depend the ingelbert. If someone is romaic then they eat the gifford. The jean is not romaic.", "logic": "\nEnjoin(jean, ingelbert)\nPotbellied(jean)\nOrganized(jean)\nEmbrace(jean, ingelbert)\nEmbrace(jean, gifford)\nDepend(jean, ingelbert)\nDepend(jean, gifford)\nPotbellied(ingelbert)\nDepend(ingelbert, jean)\nEnjoin(gifford, jean)\nforall x (Enjoin(x, gifford) -> Depend(x, gifford))\nforall x (Embrace(x, jean) -> Romaic(jean))\nforall x (Depend(x, jean) and Enjoin(x, ingelbert) -> Embrace(x, ingelbert))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, jean) -> Embrace(x, jean))\nEnjoin(ingelbert, jean) and Embrace(jean, ingelbert) -> Depend(ingelbert, gifford)\nforall x (Depend(x, ingelbert) -> Embrace(ingelbert, jean))\nDepend(ingelbert, jean) and Enjoin(jean, ingelbert) -> Depend(jean, ingelbert)\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> Enjoin(x, gifford))\n\nnot Romaic(jean)\n\nEnjoin(gifford, jean) and forall x (Enjoin(x, jean) -> Embrace(x, jean)) -> therefore Embrace(gifford, jean) Embrace(gifford, jean) and forall x (Embrace(x, jean) -> Romaic(jean)) -> therefore Romaic(jean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The tara fizz the augustin. The tara is planetary. The tara is ohmic. The tara escalade the augustin. The tara escalade the rickey. The tara nibble the augustin. The tara nibble the rickey. The augustin is planetary. The augustin nibble the tara. The rickey fizz the tara. If someone fizz the rickey then they see the rickey. If someone escalade the tara then the tara is narrative. If someone nibble the tara and they eat the augustin then they like the augustin. If someone fizz the tara then they like the tara. If the augustin fizz the tara and the tara escalade the augustin then the augustin nibble the rickey. If someone nibble the augustin then the augustin escalade the tara. If the augustin nibble the tara and the tara fizz the augustin then the tara nibble the augustin. If someone is narrative then they eat the rickey. The tara fizz the rickey.", "logic": "\nFizz(tara, augustin)\nPlanetary(tara)\nOhmic(tara)\nEscalade(tara, augustin)\nEscalade(tara, rickey)\nNibble(tara, augustin)\nNibble(tara, rickey)\nPlanetary(augustin)\nNibble(augustin, tara)\nFizz(rickey, tara)\nforall x (Fizz(x, rickey) -> Nibble(x, rickey))\nforall x (Escalade(x, tara) -> Narrative(tara))\nforall x (Nibble(x, tara) and Fizz(x, augustin) -> Escalade(x, augustin))\nforall x (Fizz(x, tara) -> Escalade(x, tara))\nFizz(augustin, tara) and Escalade(tara, augustin) -> Nibble(augustin, rickey)\nforall x (Nibble(x, augustin) -> Escalade(augustin, tara))\nNibble(augustin, tara) and Fizz(tara, augustin) -> Nibble(tara, augustin)\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Fizz(x, rickey))\n\nFizz(tara, rickey)\n\nFizz(rickey, tara) and forall x (Fizz(x, tara) -> Escalade(x, tara)) -> therefore Escalade(rickey, tara) Escalade(rickey, tara) and forall x (Escalade(x, tara) -> Narrative(tara)) -> therefore Narrative(tara) Narrative(tara) and forall x (Narrative(x) -> Fizz(x, rickey)) -> therefore Fizz(tara, rickey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The meyer whet the gregor. The meyer is thyrotoxic. The meyer is jaunty. The meyer aphorise the gregor. The meyer aphorise the bertine. The meyer itemize the gregor. The meyer itemize the bertine. The gregor is thyrotoxic. The gregor itemize the meyer. The bertine whet the meyer. If someone whet the bertine then they see the bertine. If someone aphorise the meyer then the meyer is reverent. If someone itemize the meyer and they eat the gregor then they like the gregor. If someone whet the meyer then they like the meyer. If the gregor whet the meyer and the meyer aphorise the gregor then the gregor itemize the bertine. If someone itemize the gregor then the gregor aphorise the meyer. If the gregor itemize the meyer and the meyer whet the gregor then the meyer itemize the gregor. If someone is reverent then they eat the bertine. The meyer does not eat the bertine.", "logic": "\nWhet(meyer, gregor)\nThyrotoxic(meyer)\nJaunty(meyer)\nAphorise(meyer, gregor)\nAphorise(meyer, bertine)\nItemize(meyer, gregor)\nItemize(meyer, bertine)\nThyrotoxic(gregor)\nItemize(gregor, meyer)\nWhet(bertine, meyer)\nforall x (Whet(x, bertine) -> Itemize(x, bertine))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, meyer) -> Reverent(meyer))\nforall x (Itemize(x, meyer) and Whet(x, gregor) -> Aphorise(x, gregor))\nforall x (Whet(x, meyer) -> Aphorise(x, meyer))\nWhet(gregor, meyer) and Aphorise(meyer, gregor) -> Itemize(gregor, bertine)\nforall x (Itemize(x, gregor) -> Aphorise(gregor, meyer))\nItemize(gregor, meyer) and Whet(meyer, gregor) -> Itemize(meyer, gregor)\nforall x (Reverent(x) -> Whet(x, bertine))\n\nnot Whet(meyer, bertine)\n\nWhet(bertine, meyer) and forall x (Whet(x, meyer) -> Aphorise(x, meyer)) -> therefore Aphorise(bertine, meyer) Aphorise(bertine, meyer) and forall x (Aphorise(x, meyer) -> Reverent(meyer)) -> therefore Reverent(meyer) Reverent(meyer) and forall x (Reverent(x) -> Whet(x, bertine)) -> therefore Whet(meyer, bertine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The florrie debauch the cleopatra. The florrie is thumping. The florrie is agitative. The florrie hitchhike the cleopatra. The florrie hitchhike the mimi. The florrie broaden the cleopatra. The florrie broaden the mimi. The cleopatra is thumping. The cleopatra broaden the florrie. The mimi debauch the florrie. If someone debauch the mimi then they see the mimi. If someone hitchhike the florrie then the florrie is tall. If someone broaden the florrie and they eat the cleopatra then they like the cleopatra. If someone debauch the florrie then they like the florrie. If the cleopatra debauch the florrie and the florrie hitchhike the cleopatra then the cleopatra broaden the mimi. If someone broaden the cleopatra then the cleopatra hitchhike the florrie. If the cleopatra broaden the florrie and the florrie debauch the cleopatra then the florrie broaden the cleopatra. If someone is tall then they eat the mimi. The cleopatra does not see the mimi.", "logic": "\nDebauch(florrie, cleopatra)\nThumping(florrie)\nAgitative(florrie)\nHitchhike(florrie, cleopatra)\nHitchhike(florrie, mimi)\nBroaden(florrie, cleopatra)\nBroaden(florrie, mimi)\nThumping(cleopatra)\nBroaden(cleopatra, florrie)\nDebauch(mimi, florrie)\nforall x (Debauch(x, mimi) -> Broaden(x, mimi))\nforall x (Hitchhike(x, florrie) -> Tall(florrie))\nforall x (Broaden(x, florrie) and Debauch(x, cleopatra) -> Hitchhike(x, cleopatra))\nforall x (Debauch(x, florrie) -> Hitchhike(x, florrie))\nDebauch(cleopatra, florrie) and Hitchhike(florrie, cleopatra) -> Broaden(cleopatra, mimi)\nforall x (Broaden(x, cleopatra) -> Hitchhike(cleopatra, florrie))\nBroaden(cleopatra, florrie) and Debauch(florrie, cleopatra) -> Broaden(florrie, cleopatra)\nforall x (Tall(x) -> Debauch(x, mimi))\n\nnot Broaden(cleopatra, mimi)\n\nforall x (Debauch(x, mimi) -> Broaden(x, mimi)) <- forall x (Tall(x) -> Debauch(x, mimi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The tiffany assure the frayda. The tiffany is wealthy. The tiffany is spindly. The tiffany disembark the frayda. The tiffany disembark the neala. The tiffany atomize the frayda. The tiffany atomize the neala. The frayda is wealthy. The frayda atomize the tiffany. The neala assure the tiffany. If someone assure the neala then they see the neala. If someone disembark the tiffany then the tiffany is official. If someone atomize the tiffany and they eat the frayda then they like the frayda. If someone assure the tiffany then they like the tiffany. If the frayda assure the tiffany and the tiffany disembark the frayda then the frayda atomize the neala. If someone atomize the frayda then the frayda disembark the tiffany. If the frayda atomize the tiffany and the tiffany assure the frayda then the tiffany atomize the frayda. If someone is official then they eat the neala. The tiffany disembark the tiffany.", "logic": "\nAssure(tiffany, frayda)\nWealthy(tiffany)\nSpindly(tiffany)\nDisembark(tiffany, frayda)\nDisembark(tiffany, neala)\nAtomize(tiffany, frayda)\nAtomize(tiffany, neala)\nWealthy(frayda)\nAtomize(frayda, tiffany)\nAssure(neala, tiffany)\nforall x (Assure(x, neala) -> Atomize(x, neala))\nforall x (Disembark(x, tiffany) -> Official(tiffany))\nforall x (Atomize(x, tiffany) and Assure(x, frayda) -> Disembark(x, frayda))\nforall x (Assure(x, tiffany) -> Disembark(x, tiffany))\nAssure(frayda, tiffany) and Disembark(tiffany, frayda) -> Atomize(frayda, neala)\nforall x (Atomize(x, frayda) -> Disembark(frayda, tiffany))\nAtomize(frayda, tiffany) and Assure(tiffany, frayda) -> Atomize(tiffany, frayda)\nforall x (Official(x) -> Assure(x, neala))\n\nDisembark(tiffany, tiffany)\n\nforall x (Assure(x, tiffany) -> Disembark(x, tiffany)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The sofie muddy the camila. The sofie is tiresome. The sofie is sauteed. The sofie tenant the camila. The sofie tenant the camellia. The sofie embrangle the camila. The sofie embrangle the camellia. The camila is tiresome. The camila embrangle the sofie. The camellia muddy the sofie. If someone muddy the camellia then they see the camellia. If someone tenant the sofie then the sofie is allegiant. If someone embrangle the sofie and they eat the camila then they like the camila. If someone muddy the sofie then they like the sofie. If the camila muddy the sofie and the sofie tenant the camila then the camila embrangle the camellia. If someone embrangle the camila then the camila tenant the sofie. If the camila embrangle the sofie and the sofie muddy the camila then the sofie embrangle the camila. If someone is allegiant then they eat the camellia. The camellia does not eat the camellia.", "logic": "\nMuddy(sofie, camila)\nTiresome(sofie)\nSauteed(sofie)\nTenant(sofie, camila)\nTenant(sofie, camellia)\nEmbrangle(sofie, camila)\nEmbrangle(sofie, camellia)\nTiresome(camila)\nEmbrangle(camila, sofie)\nMuddy(camellia, sofie)\nforall x (Muddy(x, camellia) -> Embrangle(x, camellia))\nforall x (Tenant(x, sofie) -> Allegiant(sofie))\nforall x (Embrangle(x, sofie) and Muddy(x, camila) -> Tenant(x, camila))\nforall x (Muddy(x, sofie) -> Tenant(x, sofie))\nMuddy(camila, sofie) and Tenant(sofie, camila) -> Embrangle(camila, camellia)\nforall x (Embrangle(x, camila) -> Tenant(camila, sofie))\nEmbrangle(camila, sofie) and Muddy(sofie, camila) -> Embrangle(sofie, camila)\nforall x (Allegiant(x) -> Muddy(x, camellia))\n\nnot Muddy(camellia, camellia)\n\nforall x (Allegiant(x) -> Muddy(x, camellia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The allis jactitate the wilburt. The allis is valved. The allis is faceless. The allis pauperize the wilburt. The allis pauperize the stormy. The allis graduate the wilburt. The allis graduate the stormy. The wilburt is valved. The wilburt graduate the allis. The stormy jactitate the allis. If someone jactitate the stormy then they see the stormy. If someone pauperize the allis then the allis is triumphal. If someone graduate the allis and they eat the wilburt then they like the wilburt. If someone jactitate the allis then they like the allis. If the wilburt jactitate the allis and the allis pauperize the wilburt then the wilburt graduate the stormy. If someone graduate the wilburt then the wilburt pauperize the allis. If the wilburt graduate the allis and the allis jactitate the wilburt then the allis graduate the wilburt. If someone is triumphal then they eat the stormy. The wilburt pauperize the wilburt.", "logic": "\nJactitate(allis, wilburt)\nValved(allis)\nFaceless(allis)\nPauperize(allis, wilburt)\nPauperize(allis, stormy)\nGraduate(allis, wilburt)\nGraduate(allis, stormy)\nValved(wilburt)\nGraduate(wilburt, allis)\nJactitate(stormy, allis)\nforall x (Jactitate(x, stormy) -> Graduate(x, stormy))\nforall x (Pauperize(x, allis) -> Triumphal(allis))\nforall x (Graduate(x, allis) and Jactitate(x, wilburt) -> Pauperize(x, wilburt))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, allis) -> Pauperize(x, allis))\nJactitate(wilburt, allis) and Pauperize(allis, wilburt) -> Graduate(wilburt, stormy)\nforall x (Graduate(x, wilburt) -> Pauperize(wilburt, allis))\nGraduate(wilburt, allis) and Jactitate(allis, wilburt) -> Graduate(allis, wilburt)\nforall x (Triumphal(x) -> Jactitate(x, stormy))\n\nPauperize(wilburt, wilburt)\n\nforall x (Graduate(x, allis) and Jactitate(x, wilburt) -> Pauperize(x, wilburt)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The anthony snip the constance. The anthony is cramped. The anthony is stripy. The anthony overbid the constance. The anthony overbid the wynton. The anthony demulsify the constance. The anthony demulsify the wynton. The constance is cramped. The constance demulsify the anthony. The wynton snip the anthony. If someone snip the wynton then they see the wynton. If someone overbid the anthony then the anthony is deepening. If someone demulsify the anthony and they eat the constance then they like the constance. If someone snip the anthony then they like the anthony. If the constance snip the anthony and the anthony overbid the constance then the constance demulsify the wynton. If someone demulsify the constance then the constance overbid the anthony. If the constance demulsify the anthony and the anthony snip the constance then the anthony demulsify the constance. If someone is deepening then they eat the wynton. The wynton is not nice.", "logic": "\nSnip(anthony, constance)\nCramped(anthony)\nStripy(anthony)\nOverbid(anthony, constance)\nOverbid(anthony, wynton)\nDemulsify(anthony, constance)\nDemulsify(anthony, wynton)\nCramped(constance)\nDemulsify(constance, anthony)\nSnip(wynton, anthony)\nforall x (Snip(x, wynton) -> Demulsify(x, wynton))\nforall x (Overbid(x, anthony) -> Deepening(anthony))\nforall x (Demulsify(x, anthony) and Snip(x, constance) -> Overbid(x, constance))\nforall x (Snip(x, anthony) -> Overbid(x, anthony))\nSnip(constance, anthony) and Overbid(anthony, constance) -> Demulsify(constance, wynton)\nforall x (Demulsify(x, constance) -> Overbid(constance, anthony))\nDemulsify(constance, anthony) and Snip(anthony, constance) -> Demulsify(anthony, constance)\nforall x (Deepening(x) -> Snip(x, wynton))\n\nnot Nice(wynton)\n\nnot Nice(wynton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The kym foliate the sutton. The kym is efficient. The kym is pentagonal. The kym covet the sutton. The kym covet the doug. The kym cancel the sutton. The kym cancel the doug. The sutton is efficient. The sutton cancel the kym. The doug foliate the kym. If someone foliate the doug then they see the doug. If someone covet the kym then the kym is priestlike. If someone cancel the kym and they eat the sutton then they like the sutton. If someone foliate the kym then they like the kym. If the sutton foliate the kym and the kym covet the sutton then the sutton cancel the doug. If someone cancel the sutton then the sutton covet the kym. If the sutton cancel the kym and the kym foliate the sutton then the kym cancel the sutton. If someone is priestlike then they eat the doug. The kym is nice.", "logic": "\nFoliate(kym, sutton)\nEfficient(kym)\nPentagonal(kym)\nCovet(kym, sutton)\nCovet(kym, doug)\nCancel(kym, sutton)\nCancel(kym, doug)\nEfficient(sutton)\nCancel(sutton, kym)\nFoliate(doug, kym)\nforall x (Foliate(x, doug) -> Cancel(x, doug))\nforall x (Covet(x, kym) -> Priestlike(kym))\nforall x (Cancel(x, kym) and Foliate(x, sutton) -> Covet(x, sutton))\nforall x (Foliate(x, kym) -> Covet(x, kym))\nFoliate(sutton, kym) and Covet(kym, sutton) -> Cancel(sutton, doug)\nforall x (Cancel(x, sutton) -> Covet(sutton, kym))\nCancel(sutton, kym) and Foliate(kym, sutton) -> Cancel(kym, sutton)\nforall x (Priestlike(x) -> Foliate(x, doug))\n\nNice(kym)\n\nNice(kym) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The dyann help the elly. The dyann is adsorbable. The dyann is straight. The dyann delegate the elly. The dyann delegate the kikelia. The dyann scaffold the elly. The dyann scaffold the kikelia. The elly is adsorbable. The elly scaffold the dyann. The kikelia help the dyann. If someone help the kikelia then they see the kikelia. If someone delegate the dyann then the dyann is longish. If someone scaffold the dyann and they eat the elly then they like the elly. If someone help the dyann then they like the dyann. If the elly help the dyann and the dyann delegate the elly then the elly scaffold the kikelia. If someone scaffold the elly then the elly delegate the dyann. If the elly scaffold the dyann and the dyann help the elly then the dyann scaffold the elly. If someone is longish then they eat the kikelia. The kikelia does not like the kikelia.", "logic": "\nHelp(dyann, elly)\nAdsorbable(dyann)\nStraight(dyann)\nDelegate(dyann, elly)\nDelegate(dyann, kikelia)\nScaffold(dyann, elly)\nScaffold(dyann, kikelia)\nAdsorbable(elly)\nScaffold(elly, dyann)\nHelp(kikelia, dyann)\nforall x (Help(x, kikelia) -> Scaffold(x, kikelia))\nforall x (Delegate(x, dyann) -> Longish(dyann))\nforall x (Scaffold(x, dyann) and Help(x, elly) -> Delegate(x, elly))\nforall x (Help(x, dyann) -> Delegate(x, dyann))\nHelp(elly, dyann) and Delegate(dyann, elly) -> Scaffold(elly, kikelia)\nforall x (Scaffold(x, elly) -> Delegate(elly, dyann))\nScaffold(elly, dyann) and Help(dyann, elly) -> Scaffold(dyann, elly)\nforall x (Longish(x) -> Help(x, kikelia))\n\nnot Delegate(kikelia, kikelia)\n\nnot Delegate(kikelia, kikelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The bubba brandmark the dyanna. The bubba is recent. The bubba is annalistic. The bubba sightsee the dyanna. The bubba sightsee the maegan. The bubba nasale the dyanna. The bubba nasale the maegan. The dyanna is recent. The dyanna nasale the bubba. The maegan brandmark the bubba. If someone brandmark the maegan then they see the maegan. If someone sightsee the bubba then the bubba is fluky. If someone nasale the bubba and they eat the dyanna then they like the dyanna. If someone brandmark the bubba then they like the bubba. If the dyanna brandmark the bubba and the bubba sightsee the dyanna then the dyanna nasale the maegan. If someone nasale the dyanna then the dyanna sightsee the bubba. If the dyanna nasale the bubba and the bubba brandmark the dyanna then the bubba nasale the dyanna. If someone is fluky then they eat the maegan. The dyanna is fluky.", "logic": "\nBrandmark(bubba, dyanna)\nRecent(bubba)\nAnnalistic(bubba)\nSightsee(bubba, dyanna)\nSightsee(bubba, maegan)\nNasale(bubba, dyanna)\nNasale(bubba, maegan)\nRecent(dyanna)\nNasale(dyanna, bubba)\nBrandmark(maegan, bubba)\nforall x (Brandmark(x, maegan) -> Nasale(x, maegan))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, bubba) -> Fluky(bubba))\nforall x (Nasale(x, bubba) and Brandmark(x, dyanna) -> Sightsee(x, dyanna))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, bubba) -> Sightsee(x, bubba))\nBrandmark(dyanna, bubba) and Sightsee(bubba, dyanna) -> Nasale(dyanna, maegan)\nforall x (Nasale(x, dyanna) -> Sightsee(dyanna, bubba))\nNasale(dyanna, bubba) and Brandmark(bubba, dyanna) -> Nasale(bubba, dyanna)\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Brandmark(x, maegan))\n\nFluky(dyanna)\n\nFluky(dyanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "Bernete is neuromotor. Bernete is predatory. Bernete is pediatric. All predatory, lusterless things are suntanned. All pediatric, millennian things are suntanned. If Bernete is neuromotor then Bernete is millennian. If something is predatory then it is neuromotor. If Bernete is suntanned then Bernete is excited. Blue, predatory things are pediatric. Bernete is neuromotor.", "logic": "\nNeuromotor(bernete)\nPredatory(bernete)\nPediatric(bernete)\nforall x (Predatory(x) and Lusterless(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and Millennian(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nNeuromotor(bernete) -> Millennian(bernete)\nforall x (Predatory(x) -> Neuromotor(x))\nSuntanned(bernete) -> Excited(bernete)\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) and Predatory(x) -> Pediatric(x))\n\nNeuromotor(bernete)\n\ntherefore Neuromotor(bernete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Catriona is unskilled. Catriona is lithic. Catriona is stubbled. All lithic, weaponless things are unstated. All stubbled, made things are unstated. If Catriona is unskilled then Catriona is made. If something is lithic then it is unskilled. If Catriona is unstated then Catriona is assuming. Blue, lithic things are stubbled. Catriona is not lithic.", "logic": "\nUnskilled(catriona)\nLithic(catriona)\nStubbled(catriona)\nforall x (Lithic(x) and Weaponless(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and Made(x) -> Unstated(x))\nUnskilled(catriona) -> Made(catriona)\nforall x (Lithic(x) -> Unskilled(x))\nUnstated(catriona) -> Assuming(catriona)\nforall x (Unskilled(x) and Lithic(x) -> Stubbled(x))\n\nnot Lithic(catriona)\n\ntherefore Lithic(catriona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Daniela is rolled. Daniela is oneiric. Daniela is divers. All oneiric, unimproved things are dynamical. All divers, unguarded things are dynamical. If Daniela is rolled then Daniela is unguarded. If something is oneiric then it is rolled. If Daniela is dynamical then Daniela is covariant. Blue, oneiric things are divers. Daniela is unguarded.", "logic": "\nRolled(daniela)\nOneiric(daniela)\nDivers(daniela)\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Unimproved(x) -> Dynamical(x))\nforall x (Divers(x) and Unguarded(x) -> Dynamical(x))\nRolled(daniela) -> Unguarded(daniela)\nforall x (Oneiric(x) -> Rolled(x))\nDynamical(daniela) -> Covariant(daniela)\nforall x (Rolled(x) and Oneiric(x) -> Divers(x))\n\nUnguarded(daniela)\n\nRolled(daniela) and Rolled(daniela) -> Unguarded(daniela) -> therefore Unguarded(daniela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Camille is azonic. Camille is five. Camille is bone. All five, sane things are honduran. All bone, lubberly things are honduran. If Camille is azonic then Camille is lubberly. If something is five then it is azonic. If Camille is honduran then Camille is ruritanian. Blue, five things are bone. Camille is not lubberly.", "logic": "\nAzonic(camille)\nFive(camille)\nBone(camille)\nforall x (Five(x) and Sane(x) -> Honduran(x))\nforall x (Bone(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Honduran(x))\nAzonic(camille) -> Lubberly(camille)\nforall x (Five(x) -> Azonic(x))\nHonduran(camille) -> Ruritanian(camille)\nforall x (Azonic(x) and Five(x) -> Bone(x))\n\nnot Lubberly(camille)\n\nAzonic(camille) and Azonic(camille) -> Lubberly(camille) -> therefore Lubberly(camille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Lyndel is paperback. Lyndel is reniform. Lyndel is corny. All reniform, wolflike things are anestrous. All corny, crowned things are anestrous. If Lyndel is paperback then Lyndel is crowned. If something is reniform then it is paperback. If Lyndel is anestrous then Lyndel is contraband. Blue, reniform things are corny. Lyndel is anestrous.", "logic": "\nPaperback(lyndel)\nReniform(lyndel)\nCorny(lyndel)\nforall x (Reniform(x) and Wolflike(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nforall x (Corny(x) and Crowned(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nPaperback(lyndel) -> Crowned(lyndel)\nforall x (Reniform(x) -> Paperback(x))\nAnestrous(lyndel) -> Contraband(lyndel)\nforall x (Paperback(x) and Reniform(x) -> Corny(x))\n\nAnestrous(lyndel)\n\nPaperback(lyndel) and Paperback(lyndel) -> Crowned(lyndel) -> therefore Crowned(lyndel) Corny(lyndel) and Crowned(lyndel) and forall x (Corny(x) and Crowned(x) -> Anestrous(x)) -> therefore Anestrous(lyndel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Melania is pivotal. Melania is incurious. Melania is anecdotal. All incurious, nicaean things are bleary. All anecdotal, judaical things are bleary. If Melania is pivotal then Melania is judaical. If something is incurious then it is pivotal. If Melania is bleary then Melania is placatory. Blue, incurious things are anecdotal. Melania is not bleary.", "logic": "\nPivotal(melania)\nIncurious(melania)\nAnecdotal(melania)\nforall x (Incurious(x) and Nicaean(x) -> Bleary(x))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) and Judaical(x) -> Bleary(x))\nPivotal(melania) -> Judaical(melania)\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Pivotal(x))\nBleary(melania) -> Placatory(melania)\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and Incurious(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\n\nnot Bleary(melania)\n\nPivotal(melania) and Pivotal(melania) -> Judaical(melania) -> therefore Judaical(melania) Anecdotal(melania) and Judaical(melania) and forall x (Anecdotal(x) and Judaical(x) -> Bleary(x)) -> therefore Bleary(melania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Adrianne is footsure. Adrianne is compatible. Adrianne is licenced. All compatible, proximal things are impotent. All licenced, untrod things are impotent. If Adrianne is footsure then Adrianne is untrod. If something is compatible then it is footsure. If Adrianne is impotent then Adrianne is temperate. Blue, compatible things are licenced. Adrianne is temperate.", "logic": "\nFootsure(adrianne)\nCompatible(adrianne)\nLicenced(adrianne)\nforall x (Compatible(x) and Proximal(x) -> Impotent(x))\nforall x (Licenced(x) and Untrod(x) -> Impotent(x))\nFootsure(adrianne) -> Untrod(adrianne)\nforall x (Compatible(x) -> Footsure(x))\nImpotent(adrianne) -> Temperate(adrianne)\nforall x (Footsure(x) and Compatible(x) -> Licenced(x))\n\nTemperate(adrianne)\n\nFootsure(adrianne) and Footsure(adrianne) -> Untrod(adrianne) -> therefore Untrod(adrianne) Licenced(adrianne) and Untrod(adrianne) and forall x (Licenced(x) and Untrod(x) -> Impotent(x)) -> therefore Impotent(adrianne) Impotent(adrianne) and Impotent(adrianne) -> Temperate(adrianne) -> therefore Temperate(adrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Margie is inbred. Margie is nonnatural. Margie is pleochroic. All nonnatural, undried things are adherent. All pleochroic, verifiable things are adherent. If Margie is inbred then Margie is verifiable. If something is nonnatural then it is inbred. If Margie is adherent then Margie is ebon. Blue, nonnatural things are pleochroic. Margie is not ebon.", "logic": "\nInbred(margie)\nNonnatural(margie)\nPleochroic(margie)\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Undried(x) -> Adherent(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Verifiable(x) -> Adherent(x))\nInbred(margie) -> Verifiable(margie)\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) -> Inbred(x))\nAdherent(margie) -> Ebon(margie)\nforall x (Inbred(x) and Nonnatural(x) -> Pleochroic(x))\n\nnot Ebon(margie)\n\nInbred(margie) and Inbred(margie) -> Verifiable(margie) -> therefore Verifiable(margie) Pleochroic(margie) and Verifiable(margie) and forall x (Pleochroic(x) and Verifiable(x) -> Adherent(x)) -> therefore Adherent(margie) Adherent(margie) and Adherent(margie) -> Ebon(margie) -> therefore Ebon(margie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Liorah is agamous. Liorah is shouted. Liorah is unpainted. Sarena is agamous. Sarena is shouted. Sarena is unequaled. Sarena is taurine. Laryssa is sinuous. Laryssa is taurine. Lina is agamous. Lina is sinuous. Lina is shouted. Lina is unpainted. Lina is taurine. Lina is unchanging. If Laryssa is taurine then Laryssa is unequaled. All unpainted things are unchanging. All agamous, unpainted things are unequaled. Young, shouted things are sinuous. All taurine, unequaled things are shouted. All taurine things are sinuous. All taurine, shouted things are agamous. Quiet things are unequaled. Lina is unpainted.", "logic": "\nAgamous(liorah)\nShouted(liorah)\nUnpainted(liorah)\nAgamous(sarena)\nShouted(sarena)\nUnequaled(sarena)\nTaurine(sarena)\nSinuous(laryssa)\nTaurine(laryssa)\nAgamous(lina)\nSinuous(lina)\nShouted(lina)\nUnpainted(lina)\nTaurine(lina)\nUnchanging(lina)\nTaurine(laryssa) -> Unequaled(laryssa)\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Agamous(x) and Unpainted(x) -> Unequaled(x))\nforall x (Unchanging(x) and Shouted(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Unequaled(x) -> Shouted(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Shouted(x) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Unequaled(x))\n\nUnpainted(lina)\n\ntherefore Unpainted(lina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Dacey is frothy. Dacey is impelling. Dacey is formalized. Harriett is frothy. Harriett is impelling. Harriett is cheery. Harriett is dozen. Elnore is dank. Elnore is dozen. Lia is frothy. Lia is dank. Lia is impelling. Lia is formalized. Lia is dozen. Lia is metameric. If Elnore is dozen then Elnore is cheery. All formalized things are metameric. All frothy, formalized things are cheery. Young, impelling things are dank. All dozen, cheery things are impelling. All dozen things are dank. All dozen, impelling things are frothy. Quiet things are cheery. Harriett is not dozen.", "logic": "\nFrothy(dacey)\nImpelling(dacey)\nFormalized(dacey)\nFrothy(harriett)\nImpelling(harriett)\nCheery(harriett)\nDozen(harriett)\nDank(elnore)\nDozen(elnore)\nFrothy(lia)\nDank(lia)\nImpelling(lia)\nFormalized(lia)\nDozen(lia)\nMetameric(lia)\nDozen(elnore) -> Cheery(elnore)\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) and Formalized(x) -> Cheery(x))\nforall x (Metameric(x) and Impelling(x) -> Dank(x))\nforall x (Dozen(x) and Cheery(x) -> Impelling(x))\nforall x (Dozen(x) -> Dank(x))\nforall x (Dozen(x) and Impelling(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> Cheery(x))\n\nnot Dozen(harriett)\n\ntherefore Dozen(harriett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Bret is viewless. Bret is aerobiotic. Bret is unshaken. Chaunce is viewless. Chaunce is aerobiotic. Chaunce is bicameral. Chaunce is catacorner. Hussein is pocketable. Hussein is catacorner. Chandal is viewless. Chandal is pocketable. Chandal is aerobiotic. Chandal is unshaken. Chandal is catacorner. Chandal is carsick. If Hussein is catacorner then Hussein is bicameral. All unshaken things are carsick. All viewless, unshaken things are bicameral. Young, aerobiotic things are pocketable. All catacorner, bicameral things are aerobiotic. All catacorner things are pocketable. All catacorner, aerobiotic things are viewless. Quiet things are bicameral. Chaunce is pocketable.", "logic": "\nViewless(bret)\nAerobiotic(bret)\nUnshaken(bret)\nViewless(chaunce)\nAerobiotic(chaunce)\nBicameral(chaunce)\nCatacorner(chaunce)\nPocketable(hussein)\nCatacorner(hussein)\nViewless(chandal)\nPocketable(chandal)\nAerobiotic(chandal)\nUnshaken(chandal)\nCatacorner(chandal)\nCarsick(chandal)\nCatacorner(hussein) -> Bicameral(hussein)\nforall x (Unshaken(x) -> Carsick(x))\nforall x (Viewless(x) and Unshaken(x) -> Bicameral(x))\nforall x (Carsick(x) and Aerobiotic(x) -> Pocketable(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Aerobiotic(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) -> Pocketable(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) and Aerobiotic(x) -> Viewless(x))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) -> Bicameral(x))\n\nPocketable(chaunce)\n\nCatacorner(chaunce) and forall x (Catacorner(x) -> Pocketable(x)) -> therefore Pocketable(chaunce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Garcia is regional. Garcia is revocable. Garcia is vagal. Isadore is regional. Isadore is revocable. Isadore is atoxic. Isadore is dressy. Arvind is reverend. Arvind is dressy. Chev is regional. Chev is reverend. Chev is revocable. Chev is vagal. Chev is dressy. Chev is foldaway. If Arvind is dressy then Arvind is atoxic. All vagal things are foldaway. All regional, vagal things are atoxic. Young, revocable things are reverend. All dressy, atoxic things are revocable. All dressy things are reverend. All dressy, revocable things are regional. Quiet things are atoxic. Isadore is not reverend.", "logic": "\nRegional(garcia)\nRevocable(garcia)\nVagal(garcia)\nRegional(isadore)\nRevocable(isadore)\nAtoxic(isadore)\nDressy(isadore)\nReverend(arvind)\nDressy(arvind)\nRegional(chev)\nReverend(chev)\nRevocable(chev)\nVagal(chev)\nDressy(chev)\nFoldaway(chev)\nDressy(arvind) -> Atoxic(arvind)\nforall x (Vagal(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Regional(x) and Vagal(x) -> Atoxic(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) and Revocable(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) and Atoxic(x) -> Revocable(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) and Revocable(x) -> Regional(x))\nforall x (Vagal(x) -> Atoxic(x))\n\nnot Reverend(isadore)\n\nDressy(isadore) and forall x (Dressy(x) -> Reverend(x)) -> therefore Reverend(isadore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Diandra is spoiled. Diandra is chylific. Diandra is raging. Violetta is spoiled. Violetta is chylific. Violetta is cesarian. Violetta is muslim. Samuel is felicitous. Samuel is muslim. Elric is spoiled. Elric is felicitous. Elric is chylific. Elric is raging. Elric is muslim. Elric is fibreoptic. If Samuel is muslim then Samuel is cesarian. All raging things are fibreoptic. All spoiled, raging things are cesarian. Young, chylific things are felicitous. All muslim, cesarian things are chylific. All muslim things are felicitous. All muslim, chylific things are spoiled. Quiet things are cesarian. Diandra is felicitous.", "logic": "\nSpoiled(diandra)\nChylific(diandra)\nRaging(diandra)\nSpoiled(violetta)\nChylific(violetta)\nCesarian(violetta)\nMuslim(violetta)\nFelicitous(samuel)\nMuslim(samuel)\nSpoiled(elric)\nFelicitous(elric)\nChylific(elric)\nRaging(elric)\nMuslim(elric)\nFibreoptic(elric)\nMuslim(samuel) -> Cesarian(samuel)\nforall x (Raging(x) -> Fibreoptic(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) and Raging(x) -> Cesarian(x))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) and Chylific(x) -> Felicitous(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) and Cesarian(x) -> Chylific(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) -> Felicitous(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) and Chylific(x) -> Spoiled(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) -> Cesarian(x))\n\nFelicitous(diandra)\n\nRaging(diandra) and forall x (Raging(x) -> Fibreoptic(x)) -> therefore Fibreoptic(diandra) Fibreoptic(diandra) and Chylific(diandra) and forall x (Fibreoptic(x) and Chylific(x) -> Felicitous(x)) -> therefore Felicitous(diandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Adelice is filmed. Adelice is vagal. Adelice is costless. Romy is filmed. Romy is vagal. Romy is uninitiate. Romy is suffering. Emmaline is common. Emmaline is suffering. Edith is filmed. Edith is common. Edith is vagal. Edith is costless. Edith is suffering. Edith is immediate. If Emmaline is suffering then Emmaline is uninitiate. All costless things are immediate. All filmed, costless things are uninitiate. Young, vagal things are common. All suffering, uninitiate things are vagal. All suffering things are common. All suffering, vagal things are filmed. Quiet things are uninitiate. Emmaline is not vagal.", "logic": "\nFilmed(adelice)\nVagal(adelice)\nCostless(adelice)\nFilmed(romy)\nVagal(romy)\nUninitiate(romy)\nSuffering(romy)\nCommon(emmaline)\nSuffering(emmaline)\nFilmed(edith)\nCommon(edith)\nVagal(edith)\nCostless(edith)\nSuffering(edith)\nImmediate(edith)\nSuffering(emmaline) -> Uninitiate(emmaline)\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Immediate(x))\nforall x (Filmed(x) and Costless(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\nforall x (Immediate(x) and Vagal(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Suffering(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Vagal(x))\nforall x (Suffering(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Suffering(x) and Vagal(x) -> Filmed(x))\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\n\nnot Vagal(emmaline)\n\nSuffering(emmaline) and Suffering(emmaline) -> Uninitiate(emmaline) -> therefore Uninitiate(emmaline) Suffering(emmaline) and Uninitiate(emmaline) and forall x (Suffering(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Vagal(x)) -> therefore Vagal(emmaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Darsie is qatari. Darsie is drifting. Darsie is vocal. Langston is qatari. Langston is drifting. Langston is inaudible. Langston is fugal. Gertrud is collected. Gertrud is fugal. Harrison is qatari. Harrison is collected. Harrison is drifting. Harrison is vocal. Harrison is fugal. Harrison is chainlike. If Gertrud is fugal then Gertrud is inaudible. All vocal things are chainlike. All qatari, vocal things are inaudible. Young, drifting things are collected. All fugal, inaudible things are drifting. All fugal things are collected. All fugal, drifting things are qatari. Quiet things are inaudible. Gertrud is qatari.", "logic": "\nQatari(darsie)\nDrifting(darsie)\nVocal(darsie)\nQatari(langston)\nDrifting(langston)\nInaudible(langston)\nFugal(langston)\nCollected(gertrud)\nFugal(gertrud)\nQatari(harrison)\nCollected(harrison)\nDrifting(harrison)\nVocal(harrison)\nFugal(harrison)\nChainlike(harrison)\nFugal(gertrud) -> Inaudible(gertrud)\nforall x (Vocal(x) -> Chainlike(x))\nforall x (Qatari(x) and Vocal(x) -> Inaudible(x))\nforall x (Chainlike(x) and Drifting(x) -> Collected(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) and Inaudible(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) -> Collected(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) and Drifting(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Vocal(x) -> Inaudible(x))\n\nQatari(gertrud)\n\nFugal(gertrud) and Fugal(gertrud) -> Inaudible(gertrud) -> therefore Inaudible(gertrud) Fugal(gertrud) and Inaudible(gertrud) and forall x (Fugal(x) and Inaudible(x) -> Drifting(x)) -> therefore Drifting(gertrud) Fugal(gertrud) and Drifting(gertrud) and forall x (Fugal(x) and Drifting(x) -> Qatari(x)) -> therefore Qatari(gertrud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Sly is outsize. Sly is unrealised. Sly is bolshevist. Elinore is outsize. Elinore is unrealised. Elinore is buttony. Elinore is specked. Magnus is underbred. Magnus is specked. Goldi is outsize. Goldi is underbred. Goldi is unrealised. Goldi is bolshevist. Goldi is specked. Goldi is unsaved. If Magnus is specked then Magnus is buttony. All bolshevist things are unsaved. All outsize, bolshevist things are buttony. Young, unrealised things are underbred. All specked, buttony things are unrealised. All specked things are underbred. All specked, unrealised things are outsize. Quiet things are buttony. Magnus is not outsize.", "logic": "\nOutsize(sly)\nUnrealised(sly)\nBolshevist(sly)\nOutsize(elinore)\nUnrealised(elinore)\nButtony(elinore)\nSpecked(elinore)\nUnderbred(magnus)\nSpecked(magnus)\nOutsize(goldi)\nUnderbred(goldi)\nUnrealised(goldi)\nBolshevist(goldi)\nSpecked(goldi)\nUnsaved(goldi)\nSpecked(magnus) -> Buttony(magnus)\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Unsaved(x))\nforall x (Outsize(x) and Bolshevist(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Unsaved(x) and Unrealised(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Specked(x) and Buttony(x) -> Unrealised(x))\nforall x (Specked(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Specked(x) and Unrealised(x) -> Outsize(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Buttony(x))\n\nnot Outsize(magnus)\n\nSpecked(magnus) and Specked(magnus) -> Buttony(magnus) -> therefore Buttony(magnus) Specked(magnus) and Buttony(magnus) and forall x (Specked(x) and Buttony(x) -> Unrealised(x)) -> therefore Unrealised(magnus) Specked(magnus) and Unrealised(magnus) and forall x (Specked(x) and Unrealised(x) -> Outsize(x)) -> therefore Outsize(magnus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Chauncey is trackable. Chauncey is cursorial. Chauncey is many. Dale is trackable. Dale is cursorial. Dale is majuscule. Dale is enduring. Yvette is apologetic. Yvette is enduring. Archy is trackable. Archy is apologetic. Archy is cursorial. Archy is many. Archy is enduring. Archy is bald. If Yvette is enduring then Yvette is majuscule. All many things are bald. All trackable, many things are majuscule. Young, cursorial things are apologetic. All enduring, majuscule things are cursorial. All enduring things are apologetic. All enduring, cursorial things are trackable. Quiet things are majuscule. Yvette is not bald.", "logic": "\nTrackable(chauncey)\nCursorial(chauncey)\nMany(chauncey)\nTrackable(dale)\nCursorial(dale)\nMajuscule(dale)\nEnduring(dale)\nApologetic(yvette)\nEnduring(yvette)\nTrackable(archy)\nApologetic(archy)\nCursorial(archy)\nMany(archy)\nEnduring(archy)\nBald(archy)\nEnduring(yvette) -> Majuscule(yvette)\nforall x (Many(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Trackable(x) and Many(x) -> Majuscule(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Cursorial(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Majuscule(x) -> Cursorial(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Cursorial(x) -> Trackable(x))\nforall x (Many(x) -> Majuscule(x))\n\nnot Bald(yvette)\n\nforall x (Many(x) -> Bald(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Dominique is booming. Dominique is evaporable. Dominique is teentsy. Pier is booming. Pier is evaporable. Pier is abaxial. Pier is waterless. Claudina is hatless. Claudina is waterless. Mason is booming. Mason is hatless. Mason is evaporable. Mason is teentsy. Mason is waterless. Mason is oversewn. If Claudina is waterless then Claudina is abaxial. All teentsy things are oversewn. All booming, teentsy things are abaxial. Young, evaporable things are hatless. All waterless, abaxial things are evaporable. All waterless things are hatless. All waterless, evaporable things are booming. Quiet things are abaxial. Pier is oversewn.", "logic": "\nBooming(dominique)\nEvaporable(dominique)\nTeentsy(dominique)\nBooming(pier)\nEvaporable(pier)\nAbaxial(pier)\nWaterless(pier)\nHatless(claudina)\nWaterless(claudina)\nBooming(mason)\nHatless(mason)\nEvaporable(mason)\nTeentsy(mason)\nWaterless(mason)\nOversewn(mason)\nWaterless(claudina) -> Abaxial(claudina)\nforall x (Teentsy(x) -> Oversewn(x))\nforall x (Booming(x) and Teentsy(x) -> Abaxial(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) and Evaporable(x) -> Hatless(x))\nforall x (Waterless(x) and Abaxial(x) -> Evaporable(x))\nforall x (Waterless(x) -> Hatless(x))\nforall x (Waterless(x) and Evaporable(x) -> Booming(x))\nforall x (Teentsy(x) -> Abaxial(x))\n\nOversewn(pier)\n\nforall x (Teentsy(x) -> Oversewn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Deanna is laminal. Deanna is privileged. Deanna is whacking. Karla is laminal. Karla is privileged. Karla is lissome. Karla is fortuitous. Lida is dopy. Lida is fortuitous. Enya is laminal. Enya is dopy. Enya is privileged. Enya is whacking. Enya is fortuitous. Enya is juridic. If Lida is fortuitous then Lida is lissome. All whacking things are juridic. All laminal, whacking things are lissome. Young, privileged things are dopy. All fortuitous, lissome things are privileged. All fortuitous things are dopy. All fortuitous, privileged things are laminal. Quiet things are lissome. Deanna is not fortuitous.", "logic": "\nLaminal(deanna)\nPrivileged(deanna)\nWhacking(deanna)\nLaminal(karla)\nPrivileged(karla)\nLissome(karla)\nFortuitous(karla)\nDopy(lida)\nFortuitous(lida)\nLaminal(enya)\nDopy(enya)\nPrivileged(enya)\nWhacking(enya)\nFortuitous(enya)\nJuridic(enya)\nFortuitous(lida) -> Lissome(lida)\nforall x (Whacking(x) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Laminal(x) and Whacking(x) -> Lissome(x))\nforall x (Juridic(x) and Privileged(x) -> Dopy(x))\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) and Lissome(x) -> Privileged(x))\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) -> Dopy(x))\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) and Privileged(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Whacking(x) -> Lissome(x))\n\nnot Fortuitous(deanna)\n\nnot Fortuitous(deanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Corene is papist. Corene is structural. Corene is tormented. Glennie is papist. Glennie is structural. Glennie is meager. Glennie is uneasy. Sianna is dovish. Sianna is uneasy. Albrecht is papist. Albrecht is dovish. Albrecht is structural. Albrecht is tormented. Albrecht is uneasy. Albrecht is sized. If Sianna is uneasy then Sianna is meager. All tormented things are sized. All papist, tormented things are meager. Young, structural things are dovish. All uneasy, meager things are structural. All uneasy things are dovish. All uneasy, structural things are papist. Quiet things are meager. Glennie is tormented.", "logic": "\nPapist(corene)\nStructural(corene)\nTormented(corene)\nPapist(glennie)\nStructural(glennie)\nMeager(glennie)\nUneasy(glennie)\nDovish(sianna)\nUneasy(sianna)\nPapist(albrecht)\nDovish(albrecht)\nStructural(albrecht)\nTormented(albrecht)\nUneasy(albrecht)\nSized(albrecht)\nUneasy(sianna) -> Meager(sianna)\nforall x (Tormented(x) -> Sized(x))\nforall x (Papist(x) and Tormented(x) -> Meager(x))\nforall x (Sized(x) and Structural(x) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) and Meager(x) -> Structural(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) and Structural(x) -> Papist(x))\nforall x (Tormented(x) -> Meager(x))\n\nTormented(glennie)\n\nTormented(glennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Travers is residuary. Melissa is fistulous. Rosemarie is straining. Angelique is yugoslav. All yugoslav people are straining. All straining people are furled. If someone is yugoslav and fistulous then they are furled. If someone is straining and not furled then they are realized. Quiet, realized people are residuary. Smart people are residuary. Melissa is fistulous.", "logic": "\nResiduary(travers)\nFistulous(melissa)\nStraining(rosemarie)\nYugoslav(angelique)\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Straining(x))\nforall x (Straining(x) -> Furled(x))\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) and Fistulous(x) -> Furled(x))\nforall x (Straining(x) and not Furled(x) -> Realized(x))\nforall x (Smothering(x) and Realized(x) -> Residuary(x))\nforall x (Furled(x) -> Residuary(x))\n\nFistulous(melissa)\n\ntherefore Fistulous(melissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Flo is astatic. Urbano is christly. Adina is invalid. Onlea is inspired. All inspired people are invalid. All invalid people are wrecked. If someone is inspired and christly then they are wrecked. If someone is invalid and not wrecked then they are unavowed. Quiet, unavowed people are astatic. Smart people are astatic. Onlea is not inspired.", "logic": "\nAstatic(flo)\nChristly(urbano)\nInvalid(adina)\nInspired(onlea)\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Inspired(x) and Christly(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and not Wrecked(x) -> Unavowed(x))\nforall x (Bilinear(x) and Unavowed(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> Astatic(x))\n\nnot Inspired(onlea)\n\ntherefore Inspired(onlea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Alexi is scratchy. Salomone is bacchic. Pietro is delusional. Kimberli is shopsoiled. All shopsoiled people are delusional. All delusional people are deft. If someone is shopsoiled and bacchic then they are deft. If someone is delusional and not deft then they are uncreative. Quiet, uncreative people are scratchy. Smart people are scratchy. Kimberli is delusional.", "logic": "\nScratchy(alexi)\nBacchic(salomone)\nDelusional(pietro)\nShopsoiled(kimberli)\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Delusional(x))\nforall x (Delusional(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) and Bacchic(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Delusional(x) and not Deft(x) -> Uncreative(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) and Uncreative(x) -> Scratchy(x))\nforall x (Deft(x) -> Scratchy(x))\n\nDelusional(kimberli)\n\nShopsoiled(kimberli) and forall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Delusional(x)) -> therefore Delusional(kimberli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Anabelle is testicular. Charita is redux. Mandi is twilight. Flipper is unembodied. All unembodied people are twilight. All twilight people are amnic. If someone is unembodied and redux then they are amnic. If someone is twilight and not amnic then they are wrathful. Quiet, wrathful people are testicular. Smart people are testicular. Flipper is not twilight.", "logic": "\nTesticular(anabelle)\nRedux(charita)\nTwilight(mandi)\nUnembodied(flipper)\nforall x (Unembodied(x) -> Twilight(x))\nforall x (Twilight(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Unembodied(x) and Redux(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Twilight(x) and not Amnic(x) -> Wrathful(x))\nforall x (Unparented(x) and Wrathful(x) -> Testicular(x))\nforall x (Amnic(x) -> Testicular(x))\n\nnot Twilight(flipper)\n\nUnembodied(flipper) and forall x (Unembodied(x) -> Twilight(x)) -> therefore Twilight(flipper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Brandice is cardboard. Cortese is hearty. Lynea is worn. Claudette is epochal. All epochal people are worn. All worn people are binocular. If someone is epochal and hearty then they are binocular. If someone is worn and not binocular then they are phonic. Quiet, phonic people are cardboard. Smart people are cardboard. Lynea is cardboard.", "logic": "\nCardboard(brandice)\nHearty(cortese)\nWorn(lynea)\nEpochal(claudette)\nforall x (Epochal(x) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Epochal(x) and Hearty(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) and not Binocular(x) -> Phonic(x))\nforall x (Xerophytic(x) and Phonic(x) -> Cardboard(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Cardboard(x))\n\nCardboard(lynea)\n\nWorn(lynea) and forall x (Worn(x) -> Binocular(x)) -> therefore Binocular(lynea) Binocular(lynea) and forall x (Binocular(x) -> Cardboard(x)) -> therefore Cardboard(lynea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Anais is limbless. Bary is clanging. Fairfax is unrecorded. Elsinore is misogynic. All misogynic people are unrecorded. All unrecorded people are libyan. If someone is misogynic and clanging then they are libyan. If someone is unrecorded and not libyan then they are grizzly. Quiet, grizzly people are limbless. Smart people are limbless. Elsinore is not libyan.", "logic": "\nLimbless(anais)\nClanging(bary)\nUnrecorded(fairfax)\nMisogynic(elsinore)\nforall x (Misogynic(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Libyan(x))\nforall x (Misogynic(x) and Clanging(x) -> Libyan(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) and not Libyan(x) -> Grizzly(x))\nforall x (Undiluted(x) and Grizzly(x) -> Limbless(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) -> Limbless(x))\n\nnot Libyan(elsinore)\n\nMisogynic(elsinore) and forall x (Misogynic(x) -> Unrecorded(x)) -> therefore Unrecorded(elsinore) Unrecorded(elsinore) and forall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Libyan(x)) -> therefore Libyan(elsinore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Tedmund is epidural. Loria is careless. Bertrand is migratory. Ike is tractive. All tractive people are migratory. All migratory people are stabilised. If someone is tractive and careless then they are stabilised. If someone is migratory and not stabilised then they are inflected. Quiet, inflected people are epidural. Smart people are epidural. Ike is epidural.", "logic": "\nEpidural(tedmund)\nCareless(loria)\nMigratory(bertrand)\nTractive(ike)\nforall x (Tractive(x) -> Migratory(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Tractive(x) and Careless(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and not Stabilised(x) -> Inflected(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Inflected(x) -> Epidural(x))\nforall x (Stabilised(x) -> Epidural(x))\n\nEpidural(ike)\n\nTractive(ike) and forall x (Tractive(x) -> Migratory(x)) -> therefore Migratory(ike) Migratory(ike) and forall x (Migratory(x) -> Stabilised(x)) -> therefore Stabilised(ike) Stabilised(ike) and forall x (Stabilised(x) -> Epidural(x)) -> therefore Epidural(ike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Cesya is venturous. Carlene is midway. Cassey is honorific. Webster is unpurified. All unpurified people are honorific. All honorific people are swank. If someone is unpurified and midway then they are swank. If someone is honorific and not swank then they are feasible. Quiet, feasible people are venturous. Smart people are venturous. Webster is not venturous.", "logic": "\nVenturous(cesya)\nMidway(carlene)\nHonorific(cassey)\nUnpurified(webster)\nforall x (Unpurified(x) -> Honorific(x))\nforall x (Honorific(x) -> Swank(x))\nforall x (Unpurified(x) and Midway(x) -> Swank(x))\nforall x (Honorific(x) and not Swank(x) -> Feasible(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) and Feasible(x) -> Venturous(x))\nforall x (Swank(x) -> Venturous(x))\n\nnot Venturous(webster)\n\nUnpurified(webster) and forall x (Unpurified(x) -> Honorific(x)) -> therefore Honorific(webster) Honorific(webster) and forall x (Honorific(x) -> Swank(x)) -> therefore Swank(webster) Swank(webster) and forall x (Swank(x) -> Venturous(x)) -> therefore Venturous(webster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Lois is homy. Ede is cohesive. Gwenneth is innovative. Raven is peachy. All peachy people are innovative. All innovative people are deep. If someone is peachy and cohesive then they are deep. If someone is innovative and not deep then they are bothersome. Quiet, bothersome people are homy. Smart people are homy. Ede is not innovative.", "logic": "\nHomy(lois)\nCohesive(ede)\nInnovative(gwenneth)\nPeachy(raven)\nforall x (Peachy(x) -> Innovative(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) -> Deep(x))\nforall x (Peachy(x) and Cohesive(x) -> Deep(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) and not Deep(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) and Bothersome(x) -> Homy(x))\nforall x (Deep(x) -> Homy(x))\n\nnot Innovative(ede)\n\nforall x (Peachy(x) -> Innovative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Morissa is overturned. Addie is apractic. Georgy is powdered. Alford is attended. All attended people are powdered. All powdered people are ignitible. If someone is attended and apractic then they are ignitible. If someone is powdered and not ignitible then they are inchoate. Quiet, inchoate people are overturned. Smart people are overturned. Morissa is ignitible.", "logic": "\nOverturned(morissa)\nApractic(addie)\nPowdered(georgy)\nAttended(alford)\nforall x (Attended(x) -> Powdered(x))\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Ignitible(x))\nforall x (Attended(x) and Apractic(x) -> Ignitible(x))\nforall x (Powdered(x) and not Ignitible(x) -> Inchoate(x))\nforall x (Vaulting(x) and Inchoate(x) -> Overturned(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) -> Overturned(x))\n\nIgnitible(morissa)\n\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Ignitible(x)) <- forall x (Attended(x) -> Powdered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Deane is shintoist. Annaliese is pockmarked. Torin is nonnomadic. Roselyn is limacine. All limacine people are nonnomadic. All nonnomadic people are crank. If someone is limacine and pockmarked then they are crank. If someone is nonnomadic and not crank then they are uneconomic. Quiet, uneconomic people are shintoist. Smart people are shintoist. Deane is not nonnomadic.", "logic": "\nShintoist(deane)\nPockmarked(annaliese)\nNonnomadic(torin)\nLimacine(roselyn)\nforall x (Limacine(x) -> Nonnomadic(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Pockmarked(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) and not Crank(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Swordlike(x) and Uneconomic(x) -> Shintoist(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) -> Shintoist(x))\n\nnot Nonnomadic(deane)\n\nforall x (Limacine(x) -> Nonnomadic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Carolan is stated. Donny is lxxiv. Kylie is aneuploid. Jenette is consolable. All consolable people are aneuploid. All aneuploid people are unsatiated. If someone is consolable and lxxiv then they are unsatiated. If someone is aneuploid and not unsatiated then they are external. Quiet, external people are stated. Smart people are stated. Donny is stated.", "logic": "\nStated(carolan)\nLxxiv(donny)\nAneuploid(kylie)\nConsolable(jenette)\nforall x (Consolable(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Consolable(x) and Lxxiv(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) and not Unsatiated(x) -> External(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and External(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) -> Stated(x))\n\nStated(donny)\n\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) -> Stated(x)) <- forall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Unsatiated(x)) <- forall x (Consolable(x) -> Aneuploid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Rodina is eyeless. Celinka is acanthoid. Aeriela is padded. Lucita is cluttered. All cluttered people are padded. All padded people are undefended. If someone is cluttered and acanthoid then they are undefended. If someone is padded and not undefended then they are unexampled. Quiet, unexampled people are eyeless. Smart people are eyeless. Rodina is not cluttered.", "logic": "\nEyeless(rodina)\nAcanthoid(celinka)\nPadded(aeriela)\nCluttered(lucita)\nforall x (Cluttered(x) -> Padded(x))\nforall x (Padded(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Cluttered(x) and Acanthoid(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Padded(x) and not Undefended(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Empurpled(x) and Unexampled(x) -> Eyeless(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) -> Eyeless(x))\n\nnot Cluttered(rodina)\n\nnot Cluttered(rodina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Germaine is initiative. Willem is unseamed. Kristen is untenanted. Samaria is impugnable. All impugnable people are untenanted. All untenanted people are dyspnoeic. If someone is impugnable and unseamed then they are dyspnoeic. If someone is untenanted and not dyspnoeic then they are abundant. Quiet, abundant people are initiative. Smart people are initiative. Kristen is impugnable.", "logic": "\nInitiative(germaine)\nUnseamed(willem)\nUntenanted(kristen)\nImpugnable(samaria)\nforall x (Impugnable(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) and Unseamed(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) and not Dyspnoeic(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Aspectual(x) and Abundant(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> Initiative(x))\n\nImpugnable(kristen)\n\nImpugnable(kristen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Brady is deserved. Fan is schizoid. Apollo is impious. Elora is adaxial. All adaxial people are impious. All impious people are tropic. If someone is adaxial and schizoid then they are tropic. If someone is impious and not tropic then they are tympanitic. Quiet, tympanitic people are deserved. Smart people are deserved. Fan is not sleek.", "logic": "\nDeserved(brady)\nSchizoid(fan)\nImpious(apollo)\nAdaxial(elora)\nforall x (Adaxial(x) -> Impious(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Tropic(x))\nforall x (Adaxial(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Tropic(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) and not Tropic(x) -> Tympanitic(x))\nforall x (Sleek(x) and Tympanitic(x) -> Deserved(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Deserved(x))\n\nnot Sleek(fan)\n\nnot Sleek(fan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Marjory is spiffing. Bryn is crustacean. Lanita is perinasal. Barret is biserrate. All biserrate people are perinasal. All perinasal people are peppy. If someone is biserrate and crustacean then they are peppy. If someone is perinasal and not peppy then they are iodinated. Quiet, iodinated people are spiffing. Smart people are spiffing. Barret is godless.", "logic": "\nSpiffing(marjory)\nCrustacean(bryn)\nPerinasal(lanita)\nBiserrate(barret)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> Perinasal(x))\nforall x (Perinasal(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Biserrate(x) and Crustacean(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Perinasal(x) and not Peppy(x) -> Iodinated(x))\nforall x (Godless(x) and Iodinated(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nforall x (Peppy(x) -> Spiffing(x))\n\nGodless(barret)\n\nGodless(barret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Candy is toothy. Lyndel is profligate. Lyndel is dighted. Lyndel is not weakening. Poppy is profligate. Poppy is not weakening. Poppy is insomniac. If something is toothy then it is weakening. If Candy is measured then Candy is insomniac. All weakening things are rhomboidal. If Lyndel is dighted then Lyndel is insomniac. All rhomboidal things are dighted. If something is insomniac and not weakening then it is dighted. Poppy is insomniac.", "logic": "\nToothy(candy)\nProfligate(lyndel)\nDighted(lyndel)\nnot Weakening(lyndel)\nProfligate(poppy)\nnot Weakening(poppy)\nInsomniac(poppy)\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Weakening(x))\nMeasured(candy) -> Insomniac(candy)\nforall x (Weakening(x) -> Rhomboidal(x))\nDighted(lyndel) -> Insomniac(lyndel)\nforall x (Rhomboidal(x) -> Dighted(x))\nforall x (Insomniac(x) and not Weakening(x) -> Dighted(x))\n\nInsomniac(poppy)\n\ntherefore Insomniac(poppy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Mindy is atavistic. Sholom is unpledged. Sholom is anisogamic. Sholom is not relaxant. Ferdinand is unpledged. Ferdinand is not relaxant. Ferdinand is tickling. If something is atavistic then it is relaxant. If Mindy is bistroic then Mindy is tickling. All relaxant things are altered. If Sholom is anisogamic then Sholom is tickling. All altered things are anisogamic. If something is tickling and not relaxant then it is anisogamic. Sholom is relaxant.", "logic": "\nAtavistic(mindy)\nUnpledged(sholom)\nAnisogamic(sholom)\nnot Relaxant(sholom)\nUnpledged(ferdinand)\nnot Relaxant(ferdinand)\nTickling(ferdinand)\nforall x (Atavistic(x) -> Relaxant(x))\nBistroic(mindy) -> Tickling(mindy)\nforall x (Relaxant(x) -> Altered(x))\nAnisogamic(sholom) -> Tickling(sholom)\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Tickling(x) and not Relaxant(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\n\nRelaxant(sholom)\n\ntherefore not Relaxant(sholom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Ammamaria is crisscross. Katy is iridescent. Katy is beaked. Katy is not male. Dona is iridescent. Dona is not male. Dona is mature. If something is crisscross then it is male. If Ammamaria is lubricious then Ammamaria is mature. All male things are tedious. If Katy is beaked then Katy is mature. All tedious things are beaked. If something is mature and not male then it is beaked. Katy is mature.", "logic": "\nCrisscross(ammamaria)\nIridescent(katy)\nBeaked(katy)\nnot Male(katy)\nIridescent(dona)\nnot Male(dona)\nMature(dona)\nforall x (Crisscross(x) -> Male(x))\nLubricious(ammamaria) -> Mature(ammamaria)\nforall x (Male(x) -> Tedious(x))\nBeaked(katy) -> Mature(katy)\nforall x (Tedious(x) -> Beaked(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) and not Male(x) -> Beaked(x))\n\nMature(katy)\n\nBeaked(katy) and Beaked(katy) -> Mature(katy) -> therefore Mature(katy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Foster is cunning. Haily is cancellate. Haily is slapstick. Haily is not uncultured. Victoria is cancellate. Victoria is not uncultured. Victoria is pulverised. If something is cunning then it is uncultured. If Foster is wooden then Foster is pulverised. All uncultured things are nonaged. If Haily is slapstick then Haily is pulverised. All nonaged things are slapstick. If something is pulverised and not uncultured then it is slapstick. Victoria is not slapstick.", "logic": "\nCunning(foster)\nCancellate(haily)\nSlapstick(haily)\nnot Uncultured(haily)\nCancellate(victoria)\nnot Uncultured(victoria)\nPulverised(victoria)\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Uncultured(x))\nWooden(foster) -> Pulverised(foster)\nforall x (Uncultured(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nSlapstick(haily) -> Pulverised(haily)\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Slapstick(x))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) and not Uncultured(x) -> Slapstick(x))\n\nnot Slapstick(victoria)\n\nPulverised(victoria) and not Uncultured(victoria) and forall x (Pulverised(x) and not Uncultured(x) -> Slapstick(x)) -> therefore Slapstick(victoria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Lambert is seraphic. Donny is middle. Donny is agleam. Donny is not glorified. Jerrilee is middle. Jerrilee is not glorified. Jerrilee is dogmatical. If something is seraphic then it is glorified. If Lambert is chuffed then Lambert is dogmatical. All glorified things are boylike. If Donny is agleam then Donny is dogmatical. All boylike things are agleam. If something is dogmatical and not glorified then it is agleam. Lambert is boylike.", "logic": "\nSeraphic(lambert)\nMiddle(donny)\nAgleam(donny)\nnot Glorified(donny)\nMiddle(jerrilee)\nnot Glorified(jerrilee)\nDogmatical(jerrilee)\nforall x (Seraphic(x) -> Glorified(x))\nChuffed(lambert) -> Dogmatical(lambert)\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Boylike(x))\nAgleam(donny) -> Dogmatical(donny)\nforall x (Boylike(x) -> Agleam(x))\nforall x (Dogmatical(x) and not Glorified(x) -> Agleam(x))\n\nBoylike(lambert)\n\nSeraphic(lambert) and forall x (Seraphic(x) -> Glorified(x)) -> therefore Glorified(lambert) Glorified(lambert) and forall x (Glorified(x) -> Boylike(x)) -> therefore Boylike(lambert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Nelsen is zairese. Anja is fragmented. Anja is directed. Anja is not canicular. Olwen is fragmented. Olwen is not canicular. Olwen is visceral. If something is zairese then it is canicular. If Nelsen is antheral then Nelsen is visceral. All canicular things are distressed. If Anja is directed then Anja is visceral. All distressed things are directed. If something is visceral and not canicular then it is directed. Nelsen is not distressed.", "logic": "\nZairese(nelsen)\nFragmented(anja)\nDirected(anja)\nnot Canicular(anja)\nFragmented(olwen)\nnot Canicular(olwen)\nVisceral(olwen)\nforall x (Zairese(x) -> Canicular(x))\nAntheral(nelsen) -> Visceral(nelsen)\nforall x (Canicular(x) -> Distressed(x))\nDirected(anja) -> Visceral(anja)\nforall x (Distressed(x) -> Directed(x))\nforall x (Visceral(x) and not Canicular(x) -> Directed(x))\n\nnot Distressed(nelsen)\n\nZairese(nelsen) and forall x (Zairese(x) -> Canicular(x)) -> therefore Canicular(nelsen) Canicular(nelsen) and forall x (Canicular(x) -> Distressed(x)) -> therefore Distressed(nelsen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Olenka is unfailing. Carry is wieldy. Carry is contiguous. Carry is not imperial. Dalton is wieldy. Dalton is not imperial. Dalton is trojan. If something is unfailing then it is imperial. If Olenka is aerated then Olenka is trojan. All imperial things are peeved. If Carry is contiguous then Carry is trojan. All peeved things are contiguous. If something is trojan and not imperial then it is contiguous. Olenka is contiguous.", "logic": "\nUnfailing(olenka)\nWieldy(carry)\nContiguous(carry)\nnot Imperial(carry)\nWieldy(dalton)\nnot Imperial(dalton)\nTrojan(dalton)\nforall x (Unfailing(x) -> Imperial(x))\nAerated(olenka) -> Trojan(olenka)\nforall x (Imperial(x) -> Peeved(x))\nContiguous(carry) -> Trojan(carry)\nforall x (Peeved(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Trojan(x) and not Imperial(x) -> Contiguous(x))\n\nContiguous(olenka)\n\nUnfailing(olenka) and forall x (Unfailing(x) -> Imperial(x)) -> therefore Imperial(olenka) Imperial(olenka) and forall x (Imperial(x) -> Peeved(x)) -> therefore Peeved(olenka) Peeved(olenka) and forall x (Peeved(x) -> Contiguous(x)) -> therefore Contiguous(olenka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Fawn is diagonal. Talbot is fluent. Talbot is oblique. Talbot is not bellicose. Joy is fluent. Joy is not bellicose. Joy is maidenly. If something is diagonal then it is bellicose. If Fawn is maidenly then Fawn is maidenly. All bellicose things are agnostical. If Talbot is oblique then Talbot is maidenly. All agnostical things are oblique. If something is maidenly and not bellicose then it is oblique. Fawn is not oblique.", "logic": "\nDiagonal(fawn)\nFluent(talbot)\nOblique(talbot)\nnot Bellicose(talbot)\nFluent(joy)\nnot Bellicose(joy)\nMaidenly(joy)\nforall x (Diagonal(x) -> Bellicose(x))\nMaidenly(fawn) -> Maidenly(fawn)\nforall x (Bellicose(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nOblique(talbot) -> Maidenly(talbot)\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Oblique(x))\nforall x (Maidenly(x) and not Bellicose(x) -> Oblique(x))\n\nnot Oblique(fawn)\n\nDiagonal(fawn) and forall x (Diagonal(x) -> Bellicose(x)) -> therefore Bellicose(fawn) Bellicose(fawn) and forall x (Bellicose(x) -> Agnostical(x)) -> therefore Agnostical(fawn) Agnostical(fawn) and forall x (Agnostical(x) -> Oblique(x)) -> therefore Oblique(fawn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Katharina is joyful. Tucker is evenhanded. Tucker is cancellous. Tucker is not clean. Ezechiel is evenhanded. Ezechiel is not clean. Ezechiel is daunting. If something is joyful then it is clean. If Katharina is numerous then Katharina is daunting. All clean things are stern. If Tucker is cancellous then Tucker is daunting. All stern things are cancellous. If something is daunting and not clean then it is cancellous. Tucker is not stern.", "logic": "\nJoyful(katharina)\nEvenhanded(tucker)\nCancellous(tucker)\nnot Clean(tucker)\nEvenhanded(ezechiel)\nnot Clean(ezechiel)\nDaunting(ezechiel)\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Clean(x))\nNumerous(katharina) -> Daunting(katharina)\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Stern(x))\nCancellous(tucker) -> Daunting(tucker)\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Cancellous(x))\nforall x (Daunting(x) and not Clean(x) -> Cancellous(x))\n\nnot Stern(tucker)\n\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Stern(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Neel is vehement. Brody is popish. Brody is outright. Brody is not cyprian. Garrot is popish. Garrot is not cyprian. Garrot is sedgy. If something is vehement then it is cyprian. If Neel is close then Neel is sedgy. All cyprian things are decimal. If Brody is outright then Brody is sedgy. All decimal things are outright. If something is sedgy and not cyprian then it is outright. Garrot is decimal.", "logic": "\nVehement(neel)\nPopish(brody)\nOutright(brody)\nnot Cyprian(brody)\nPopish(garrot)\nnot Cyprian(garrot)\nSedgy(garrot)\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nClose(neel) -> Sedgy(neel)\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Decimal(x))\nOutright(brody) -> Sedgy(brody)\nforall x (Decimal(x) -> Outright(x))\nforall x (Sedgy(x) and not Cyprian(x) -> Outright(x))\n\nDecimal(garrot)\n\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Decimal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Bliss is shuddery. Kaitlin is stressed. Kaitlin is curtal. Kaitlin is not congenial. Annabal is stressed. Annabal is not congenial. Annabal is brahminic. If something is shuddery then it is congenial. If Bliss is auctorial then Bliss is brahminic. All congenial things are publicized. If Kaitlin is curtal then Kaitlin is brahminic. All publicized things are curtal. If something is brahminic and not congenial then it is curtal. Bliss is not brahminic.", "logic": "\nShuddery(bliss)\nStressed(kaitlin)\nCurtal(kaitlin)\nnot Congenial(kaitlin)\nStressed(annabal)\nnot Congenial(annabal)\nBrahminic(annabal)\nforall x (Shuddery(x) -> Congenial(x))\nAuctorial(bliss) -> Brahminic(bliss)\nforall x (Congenial(x) -> Publicized(x))\nCurtal(kaitlin) -> Brahminic(kaitlin)\nforall x (Publicized(x) -> Curtal(x))\nforall x (Brahminic(x) and not Congenial(x) -> Curtal(x))\n\nnot Brahminic(bliss)\n\nAuctorial(bliss) -> Brahminic(bliss) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Perla is fimbriate. Debby is untoasted. Debby is trigonal. Debby is not clonic. Katusha is untoasted. Katusha is not clonic. Katusha is scary. If something is fimbriate then it is clonic. If Perla is appareled then Perla is scary. All clonic things are accursed. If Debby is trigonal then Debby is scary. All accursed things are trigonal. If something is scary and not clonic then it is trigonal. Perla is appareled.", "logic": "\nFimbriate(perla)\nUntoasted(debby)\nTrigonal(debby)\nnot Clonic(debby)\nUntoasted(katusha)\nnot Clonic(katusha)\nScary(katusha)\nforall x (Fimbriate(x) -> Clonic(x))\nAppareled(perla) -> Scary(perla)\nforall x (Clonic(x) -> Accursed(x))\nTrigonal(debby) -> Scary(debby)\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Trigonal(x))\nforall x (Scary(x) and not Clonic(x) -> Trigonal(x))\n\nAppareled(perla)\n\nAppareled(perla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Travers is soaked. Tandy is carbolated. Tandy is prolix. Tandy is not angulate. Paule is carbolated. Paule is not angulate. Paule is political. If something is soaked then it is angulate. If Travers is diabolical then Travers is political. All angulate things are several. If Tandy is prolix then Tandy is political. All several things are prolix. If something is political and not angulate then it is prolix. Tandy is not soaked.", "logic": "\nSoaked(travers)\nCarbolated(tandy)\nProlix(tandy)\nnot Angulate(tandy)\nCarbolated(paule)\nnot Angulate(paule)\nPolitical(paule)\nforall x (Soaked(x) -> Angulate(x))\nDiabolical(travers) -> Political(travers)\nforall x (Angulate(x) -> Several(x))\nProlix(tandy) -> Political(tandy)\nforall x (Several(x) -> Prolix(x))\nforall x (Political(x) and not Angulate(x) -> Prolix(x))\n\nnot Soaked(tandy)\n\nnot Soaked(tandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Tomi is magnified. Fletcher is retiring. Fletcher is fazed. Fletcher is not incidental. Garfield is retiring. Garfield is not incidental. Garfield is autoicous. If something is magnified then it is incidental. If Tomi is voteless then Tomi is autoicous. All incidental things are boggy. If Fletcher is fazed then Fletcher is autoicous. All boggy things are fazed. If something is autoicous and not incidental then it is fazed. Garfield is voteless.", "logic": "\nMagnified(tomi)\nRetiring(fletcher)\nFazed(fletcher)\nnot Incidental(fletcher)\nRetiring(garfield)\nnot Incidental(garfield)\nAutoicous(garfield)\nforall x (Magnified(x) -> Incidental(x))\nVoteless(tomi) -> Autoicous(tomi)\nforall x (Incidental(x) -> Boggy(x))\nFazed(fletcher) -> Autoicous(fletcher)\nforall x (Boggy(x) -> Fazed(x))\nforall x (Autoicous(x) and not Incidental(x) -> Fazed(x))\n\nVoteless(garfield)\n\nVoteless(garfield) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Rina is bareback. Elihu is illegal. Elihu is charmed. Elihu is not cumbersome. Joaquin is illegal. Joaquin is not cumbersome. Joaquin is protean. If something is bareback then it is cumbersome. If Rina is reposeful then Rina is protean. All cumbersome things are jobless. If Elihu is charmed then Elihu is protean. All jobless things are charmed. If something is protean and not cumbersome then it is charmed. Joaquin is not bareback.", "logic": "\nBareback(rina)\nIllegal(elihu)\nCharmed(elihu)\nnot Cumbersome(elihu)\nIllegal(joaquin)\nnot Cumbersome(joaquin)\nProtean(joaquin)\nforall x (Bareback(x) -> Cumbersome(x))\nReposeful(rina) -> Protean(rina)\nforall x (Cumbersome(x) -> Jobless(x))\nCharmed(elihu) -> Protean(elihu)\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Charmed(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) and not Cumbersome(x) -> Charmed(x))\n\nnot Bareback(joaquin)\n\nnot Bareback(joaquin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Karleen is parvenue. Sanderson is sunless. Sanderson is foul. Sanderson is not capitate. Stearn is sunless. Stearn is not capitate. Stearn is loosened. If something is parvenue then it is capitate. If Karleen is brassbound then Karleen is loosened. All capitate things are yeatsian. If Sanderson is foul then Sanderson is loosened. All yeatsian things are foul. If something is loosened and not capitate then it is foul. Sanderson is brassbound.", "logic": "\nParvenue(karleen)\nSunless(sanderson)\nFoul(sanderson)\nnot Capitate(sanderson)\nSunless(stearn)\nnot Capitate(stearn)\nLoosened(stearn)\nforall x (Parvenue(x) -> Capitate(x))\nBrassbound(karleen) -> Loosened(karleen)\nforall x (Capitate(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nFoul(sanderson) -> Loosened(sanderson)\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) -> Foul(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) and not Capitate(x) -> Foul(x))\n\nBrassbound(sanderson)\n\nBrassbound(sanderson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "The trudy is perforate. The trudy magnify the jill. The jill debilitate the trudy. The jill chagrin the trudy. The jill is aweary. The jill is costal. The jill magnify the trudy. If the trudy is assumed then the trudy chagrin the jill. If someone is assumed and they eat the jill then they like the trudy. If the trudy magnify the jill and the jill chagrin the trudy then the trudy debilitate the jill. If someone is perforate then they chase the jill. If the jill magnify the trudy and the trudy magnify the jill then the jill is aweary. If the trudy chagrin the jill and the jill chagrin the trudy then the jill is discharged. If someone debilitate the trudy and they are aweary then the trudy is assumed. If someone magnify the jill and they chase the jill then they chase the trudy. The jill is costal.", "logic": "\nPerforate(trudy)\nMagnify(trudy, jill)\nDebilitate(jill, trudy)\nChagrin(jill, trudy)\nAweary(jill)\nCostal(jill)\nMagnify(jill, trudy)\nAssumed(trudy) -> Chagrin(trudy, jill)\nforall x (Assumed(x) and Chagrin(x, jill) -> Magnify(x, trudy))\nMagnify(trudy, jill) and Chagrin(jill, trudy) -> Debilitate(trudy, jill)\nforall x (Perforate(x) -> Debilitate(x, jill))\nMagnify(jill, trudy) and Magnify(trudy, jill) -> Aweary(jill)\nChagrin(trudy, jill) and Chagrin(jill, trudy) -> Discharged(jill)\nforall x (Debilitate(x, trudy) and Aweary(x) -> Assumed(trudy))\nforall x (Magnify(x, jill) and Debilitate(x, jill) -> Debilitate(x, trudy))\n\nCostal(jill)\n\ntherefore Costal(jill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The caralie is gustatory. The caralie sojourn the malena. The malena intonate the caralie. The malena flick the caralie. The malena is fortified. The malena is hard. The malena sojourn the caralie. If the caralie is chatty then the caralie flick the malena. If someone is chatty and they eat the malena then they like the caralie. If the caralie sojourn the malena and the malena flick the caralie then the caralie intonate the malena. If someone is gustatory then they chase the malena. If the malena sojourn the caralie and the caralie sojourn the malena then the malena is fortified. If the caralie flick the malena and the malena flick the caralie then the malena is front. If someone intonate the caralie and they are fortified then the caralie is chatty. If someone sojourn the malena and they chase the malena then they chase the caralie. The caralie does not like the malena.", "logic": "\nGustatory(caralie)\nSojourn(caralie, malena)\nIntonate(malena, caralie)\nFlick(malena, caralie)\nFortified(malena)\nHard(malena)\nSojourn(malena, caralie)\nChatty(caralie) -> Flick(caralie, malena)\nforall x (Chatty(x) and Flick(x, malena) -> Sojourn(x, caralie))\nSojourn(caralie, malena) and Flick(malena, caralie) -> Intonate(caralie, malena)\nforall x (Gustatory(x) -> Intonate(x, malena))\nSojourn(malena, caralie) and Sojourn(caralie, malena) -> Fortified(malena)\nFlick(caralie, malena) and Flick(malena, caralie) -> Front(malena)\nforall x (Intonate(x, caralie) and Fortified(x) -> Chatty(caralie))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, malena) and Intonate(x, malena) -> Intonate(x, caralie))\n\nnot Sojourn(caralie, malena)\n\ntherefore Sojourn(caralie, malena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The roselin is together. The roselin mortify the liora. The liora progress the roselin. The liora pester the roselin. The liora is unwise. The liora is aerial. The liora mortify the roselin. If the roselin is flowing then the roselin pester the liora. If someone is flowing and they eat the liora then they like the roselin. If the roselin mortify the liora and the liora pester the roselin then the roselin progress the liora. If someone is together then they chase the liora. If the liora mortify the roselin and the roselin mortify the liora then the liora is unwise. If the roselin pester the liora and the liora pester the roselin then the liora is unspent. If someone progress the roselin and they are unwise then the roselin is flowing. If someone mortify the liora and they chase the liora then they chase the roselin. The roselin is flowing.", "logic": "\nTogether(roselin)\nMortify(roselin, liora)\nProgress(liora, roselin)\nPester(liora, roselin)\nUnwise(liora)\nAerial(liora)\nMortify(liora, roselin)\nFlowing(roselin) -> Pester(roselin, liora)\nforall x (Flowing(x) and Pester(x, liora) -> Mortify(x, roselin))\nMortify(roselin, liora) and Pester(liora, roselin) -> Progress(roselin, liora)\nforall x (Together(x) -> Progress(x, liora))\nMortify(liora, roselin) and Mortify(roselin, liora) -> Unwise(liora)\nPester(roselin, liora) and Pester(liora, roselin) -> Unspent(liora)\nforall x (Progress(x, roselin) and Unwise(x) -> Flowing(roselin))\nforall x (Mortify(x, liora) and Progress(x, liora) -> Progress(x, roselin))\n\nFlowing(roselin)\n\nProgress(liora, roselin) and Unwise(liora) and forall x (Progress(x, roselin) and Unwise(x) -> Flowing(roselin)) -> therefore Flowing(roselin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The marwin is apocryphal. The marwin jeopardize the trixy. The trixy pout the marwin. The trixy exhale the marwin. The trixy is fatless. The trixy is very. The trixy jeopardize the marwin. If the marwin is dread then the marwin exhale the trixy. If someone is dread and they eat the trixy then they like the marwin. If the marwin jeopardize the trixy and the trixy exhale the marwin then the marwin pout the trixy. If someone is apocryphal then they chase the trixy. If the trixy jeopardize the marwin and the marwin jeopardize the trixy then the trixy is fatless. If the marwin exhale the trixy and the trixy exhale the marwin then the trixy is convergent. If someone pout the marwin and they are fatless then the marwin is dread. If someone jeopardize the trixy and they chase the trixy then they chase the marwin. The marwin does not chase the trixy.", "logic": "\nApocryphal(marwin)\nJeopardize(marwin, trixy)\nPout(trixy, marwin)\nExhale(trixy, marwin)\nFatless(trixy)\nVery(trixy)\nJeopardize(trixy, marwin)\nDread(marwin) -> Exhale(marwin, trixy)\nforall x (Dread(x) and Exhale(x, trixy) -> Jeopardize(x, marwin))\nJeopardize(marwin, trixy) and Exhale(trixy, marwin) -> Pout(marwin, trixy)\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Pout(x, trixy))\nJeopardize(trixy, marwin) and Jeopardize(marwin, trixy) -> Fatless(trixy)\nExhale(marwin, trixy) and Exhale(trixy, marwin) -> Convergent(trixy)\nforall x (Pout(x, marwin) and Fatless(x) -> Dread(marwin))\nforall x (Jeopardize(x, trixy) and Pout(x, trixy) -> Pout(x, marwin))\n\nnot Pout(marwin, trixy)\n\nApocryphal(marwin) and forall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Pout(x, trixy)) -> therefore Pout(marwin, trixy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The hally is cultivable. The hally josh the rodrigo. The rodrigo bang the hally. The rodrigo service the hally. The rodrigo is sensitized. The rodrigo is wraithlike. The rodrigo josh the hally. If the hally is distressed then the hally service the rodrigo. If someone is distressed and they eat the rodrigo then they like the hally. If the hally josh the rodrigo and the rodrigo service the hally then the hally bang the rodrigo. If someone is cultivable then they chase the rodrigo. If the rodrigo josh the hally and the hally josh the rodrigo then the rodrigo is sensitized. If the hally service the rodrigo and the rodrigo service the hally then the rodrigo is utility. If someone bang the hally and they are sensitized then the hally is distressed. If someone josh the rodrigo and they chase the rodrigo then they chase the hally. The hally service the rodrigo.", "logic": "\nCultivable(hally)\nJosh(hally, rodrigo)\nBang(rodrigo, hally)\nService(rodrigo, hally)\nSensitized(rodrigo)\nWraithlike(rodrigo)\nJosh(rodrigo, hally)\nDistressed(hally) -> Service(hally, rodrigo)\nforall x (Distressed(x) and Service(x, rodrigo) -> Josh(x, hally))\nJosh(hally, rodrigo) and Service(rodrigo, hally) -> Bang(hally, rodrigo)\nforall x (Cultivable(x) -> Bang(x, rodrigo))\nJosh(rodrigo, hally) and Josh(hally, rodrigo) -> Sensitized(rodrigo)\nService(hally, rodrigo) and Service(rodrigo, hally) -> Utility(rodrigo)\nforall x (Bang(x, hally) and Sensitized(x) -> Distressed(hally))\nforall x (Josh(x, rodrigo) and Bang(x, rodrigo) -> Bang(x, hally))\n\nService(hally, rodrigo)\n\nBang(rodrigo, hally) and Sensitized(rodrigo) and forall x (Bang(x, hally) and Sensitized(x) -> Distressed(hally)) -> therefore Distressed(hally) Distressed(hally) and Distressed(hally) -> Service(hally, rodrigo) -> therefore Service(hally, rodrigo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The elke is democratic. The elke garland the ilene. The ilene surround the elke. The ilene ruddle the elke. The ilene is unobvious. The ilene is vesicatory. The ilene garland the elke. If the elke is climbable then the elke ruddle the ilene. If someone is climbable and they eat the ilene then they like the elke. If the elke garland the ilene and the ilene ruddle the elke then the elke surround the ilene. If someone is democratic then they chase the ilene. If the ilene garland the elke and the elke garland the ilene then the ilene is unobvious. If the elke ruddle the ilene and the ilene ruddle the elke then the ilene is crownless. If someone surround the elke and they are unobvious then the elke is climbable. If someone garland the ilene and they chase the ilene then they chase the elke. The elke does not chase the elke.", "logic": "\nDemocratic(elke)\nGarland(elke, ilene)\nSurround(ilene, elke)\nRuddle(ilene, elke)\nUnobvious(ilene)\nVesicatory(ilene)\nGarland(ilene, elke)\nClimbable(elke) -> Ruddle(elke, ilene)\nforall x (Climbable(x) and Ruddle(x, ilene) -> Garland(x, elke))\nGarland(elke, ilene) and Ruddle(ilene, elke) -> Surround(elke, ilene)\nforall x (Democratic(x) -> Surround(x, ilene))\nGarland(ilene, elke) and Garland(elke, ilene) -> Unobvious(ilene)\nRuddle(elke, ilene) and Ruddle(ilene, elke) -> Crownless(ilene)\nforall x (Surround(x, elke) and Unobvious(x) -> Climbable(elke))\nforall x (Garland(x, ilene) and Surround(x, ilene) -> Surround(x, elke))\n\nnot Surround(elke, elke)\n\nDemocratic(elke) and forall x (Democratic(x) -> Surround(x, ilene)) -> therefore Surround(elke, ilene) Garland(elke, ilene) and Surround(elke, ilene) and forall x (Garland(x, ilene) and Surround(x, ilene) -> Surround(x, elke)) -> therefore Surround(elke, elke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The patsy is theoretic. The patsy honeycomb the patricia. The patricia connote the patsy. The patricia premier the patsy. The patricia is worshipped. The patricia is weird. The patricia honeycomb the patsy. If the patsy is befuddled then the patsy premier the patricia. If someone is befuddled and they eat the patricia then they like the patsy. If the patsy honeycomb the patricia and the patricia premier the patsy then the patsy connote the patricia. If someone is theoretic then they chase the patricia. If the patricia honeycomb the patsy and the patsy honeycomb the patricia then the patricia is worshipped. If the patsy premier the patricia and the patricia premier the patsy then the patricia is bulgy. If someone connote the patsy and they are worshipped then the patsy is befuddled. If someone honeycomb the patricia and they chase the patricia then they chase the patsy. The patsy honeycomb the patsy.", "logic": "\nTheoretic(patsy)\nHoneycomb(patsy, patricia)\nConnote(patricia, patsy)\nPremier(patricia, patsy)\nWorshipped(patricia)\nWeird(patricia)\nHoneycomb(patricia, patsy)\nBefuddled(patsy) -> Premier(patsy, patricia)\nforall x (Befuddled(x) and Premier(x, patricia) -> Honeycomb(x, patsy))\nHoneycomb(patsy, patricia) and Premier(patricia, patsy) -> Connote(patsy, patricia)\nforall x (Theoretic(x) -> Connote(x, patricia))\nHoneycomb(patricia, patsy) and Honeycomb(patsy, patricia) -> Worshipped(patricia)\nPremier(patsy, patricia) and Premier(patricia, patsy) -> Bulgy(patricia)\nforall x (Connote(x, patsy) and Worshipped(x) -> Befuddled(patsy))\nforall x (Honeycomb(x, patricia) and Connote(x, patricia) -> Connote(x, patsy))\n\nHoneycomb(patsy, patsy)\n\nConnote(patricia, patsy) and Worshipped(patricia) and forall x (Connote(x, patsy) and Worshipped(x) -> Befuddled(patsy)) -> therefore Befuddled(patsy) Connote(patricia, patsy) and Worshipped(patricia) and forall x (Connote(x, patsy) and Worshipped(x) -> Befuddled(patsy)) -> therefore Befuddled(patsy) Befuddled(patsy) and Befuddled(patsy) -> Premier(patsy, patricia) -> therefore Premier(patsy, patricia) Befuddled(patsy) and Premier(patsy, patricia) and forall x (Befuddled(x) and Premier(x, patricia) -> Honeycomb(x, patsy)) -> therefore Honeycomb(patsy, patsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The reuben is restive. The reuben branch the rufe. The rufe nictitate the reuben. The rufe unbutton the reuben. The rufe is argent. The rufe is anticancer. The rufe branch the reuben. If the reuben is classless then the reuben unbutton the rufe. If someone is classless and they eat the rufe then they like the reuben. If the reuben branch the rufe and the rufe unbutton the reuben then the reuben nictitate the rufe. If someone is restive then they chase the rufe. If the rufe branch the reuben and the reuben branch the rufe then the rufe is argent. If the reuben unbutton the rufe and the rufe unbutton the reuben then the rufe is botryoid. If someone nictitate the reuben and they are argent then the reuben is classless. If someone branch the rufe and they chase the rufe then they chase the reuben. The rufe is not botryoid.", "logic": "\nRestive(reuben)\nBranch(reuben, rufe)\nNictitate(rufe, reuben)\nUnbutton(rufe, reuben)\nArgent(rufe)\nAnticancer(rufe)\nBranch(rufe, reuben)\nClassless(reuben) -> Unbutton(reuben, rufe)\nforall x (Classless(x) and Unbutton(x, rufe) -> Branch(x, reuben))\nBranch(reuben, rufe) and Unbutton(rufe, reuben) -> Nictitate(reuben, rufe)\nforall x (Restive(x) -> Nictitate(x, rufe))\nBranch(rufe, reuben) and Branch(reuben, rufe) -> Argent(rufe)\nUnbutton(reuben, rufe) and Unbutton(rufe, reuben) -> Botryoid(rufe)\nforall x (Nictitate(x, reuben) and Argent(x) -> Classless(reuben))\nforall x (Branch(x, rufe) and Nictitate(x, rufe) -> Nictitate(x, reuben))\n\nnot Botryoid(rufe)\n\nNictitate(rufe, reuben) and Argent(rufe) and forall x (Nictitate(x, reuben) and Argent(x) -> Classless(reuben)) -> therefore Classless(reuben) Classless(reuben) and Classless(reuben) -> Unbutton(reuben, rufe) -> therefore Unbutton(reuben, rufe) Unbutton(reuben, rufe) and Unbutton(rufe, reuben) and Unbutton(reuben, rufe) and Unbutton(rufe, reuben) -> Botryoid(rufe) -> therefore Botryoid(rufe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The lucius is overgreedy. The lucius bedeck the hillard. The hillard constrict the lucius. The hillard will the lucius. The hillard is musky. The hillard is inaccurate. The hillard bedeck the lucius. If the lucius is areolate then the lucius will the hillard. If someone is areolate and they eat the hillard then they like the lucius. If the lucius bedeck the hillard and the hillard will the lucius then the lucius constrict the hillard. If someone is overgreedy then they chase the hillard. If the hillard bedeck the lucius and the lucius bedeck the hillard then the hillard is musky. If the lucius will the hillard and the hillard will the lucius then the hillard is cardboard. If someone constrict the lucius and they are musky then the lucius is areolate. If someone bedeck the hillard and they chase the hillard then they chase the lucius. The hillard does not chase the hillard.", "logic": "\nOvergreedy(lucius)\nBedeck(lucius, hillard)\nConstrict(hillard, lucius)\nWill(hillard, lucius)\nMusky(hillard)\nInaccurate(hillard)\nBedeck(hillard, lucius)\nAreolate(lucius) -> Will(lucius, hillard)\nforall x (Areolate(x) and Will(x, hillard) -> Bedeck(x, lucius))\nBedeck(lucius, hillard) and Will(hillard, lucius) -> Constrict(lucius, hillard)\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Constrict(x, hillard))\nBedeck(hillard, lucius) and Bedeck(lucius, hillard) -> Musky(hillard)\nWill(lucius, hillard) and Will(hillard, lucius) -> Cardboard(hillard)\nforall x (Constrict(x, lucius) and Musky(x) -> Areolate(lucius))\nforall x (Bedeck(x, hillard) and Constrict(x, hillard) -> Constrict(x, lucius))\n\nnot Constrict(hillard, hillard)\n\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Constrict(x, hillard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The gennie is hale. The gennie mollify the nigel. The nigel preclude the gennie. The nigel stew the gennie. The nigel is asat. The nigel is liverish. The nigel mollify the gennie. If the gennie is isosceles then the gennie stew the nigel. If someone is isosceles and they eat the nigel then they like the gennie. If the gennie mollify the nigel and the nigel stew the gennie then the gennie preclude the nigel. If someone is hale then they chase the nigel. If the nigel mollify the gennie and the gennie mollify the nigel then the nigel is asat. If the gennie stew the nigel and the nigel stew the gennie then the nigel is preserved. If someone preclude the gennie and they are asat then the gennie is isosceles. If someone mollify the nigel and they chase the nigel then they chase the gennie. The nigel stew the nigel.", "logic": "\nHale(gennie)\nMollify(gennie, nigel)\nPreclude(nigel, gennie)\nStew(nigel, gennie)\nAsat(nigel)\nLiverish(nigel)\nMollify(nigel, gennie)\nIsosceles(gennie) -> Stew(gennie, nigel)\nforall x (Isosceles(x) and Stew(x, nigel) -> Mollify(x, gennie))\nMollify(gennie, nigel) and Stew(nigel, gennie) -> Preclude(gennie, nigel)\nforall x (Hale(x) -> Preclude(x, nigel))\nMollify(nigel, gennie) and Mollify(gennie, nigel) -> Asat(nigel)\nStew(gennie, nigel) and Stew(nigel, gennie) -> Preserved(nigel)\nforall x (Preclude(x, gennie) and Asat(x) -> Isosceles(gennie))\nforall x (Mollify(x, nigel) and Preclude(x, nigel) -> Preclude(x, gennie))\n\nStew(nigel, nigel)\n\nStew(nigel, nigel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The valma is base. The valma motorboat the zena. The zena hackle the valma. The zena slap the valma. The zena is veinal. The zena is coriaceous. The zena motorboat the valma. If the valma is early then the valma slap the zena. If someone is early and they eat the zena then they like the valma. If the valma motorboat the zena and the zena slap the valma then the valma hackle the zena. If someone is base then they chase the zena. If the zena motorboat the valma and the valma motorboat the zena then the zena is veinal. If the valma slap the zena and the zena slap the valma then the zena is unfruitful. If someone hackle the valma and they are veinal then the valma is early. If someone motorboat the zena and they chase the zena then they chase the valma. The valma does not eat the valma.", "logic": "\nBase(valma)\nMotorboat(valma, zena)\nHackle(zena, valma)\nSlap(zena, valma)\nVeinal(zena)\nCoriaceous(zena)\nMotorboat(zena, valma)\nEarly(valma) -> Slap(valma, zena)\nforall x (Early(x) and Slap(x, zena) -> Motorboat(x, valma))\nMotorboat(valma, zena) and Slap(zena, valma) -> Hackle(valma, zena)\nforall x (Base(x) -> Hackle(x, zena))\nMotorboat(zena, valma) and Motorboat(valma, zena) -> Veinal(zena)\nSlap(valma, zena) and Slap(zena, valma) -> Unfruitful(zena)\nforall x (Hackle(x, valma) and Veinal(x) -> Early(valma))\nforall x (Motorboat(x, zena) and Hackle(x, zena) -> Hackle(x, valma))\n\nnot Slap(valma, valma)\n\nnot Slap(valma, valma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The gusty is severed. The gusty sanitate the kitty. The kitty spiritise the gusty. The kitty ensure the gusty. The kitty is allegiant. The kitty is soundless. The kitty sanitate the gusty. If the gusty is diarrhetic then the gusty ensure the kitty. If someone is diarrhetic and they eat the kitty then they like the gusty. If the gusty sanitate the kitty and the kitty ensure the gusty then the gusty spiritise the kitty. If someone is severed then they chase the kitty. If the kitty sanitate the gusty and the gusty sanitate the kitty then the kitty is allegiant. If the gusty ensure the kitty and the kitty ensure the gusty then the kitty is natural. If someone spiritise the gusty and they are allegiant then the gusty is diarrhetic. If someone sanitate the kitty and they chase the kitty then they chase the gusty. The kitty sanitate the kitty.", "logic": "\nSevered(gusty)\nSanitate(gusty, kitty)\nSpiritise(kitty, gusty)\nEnsure(kitty, gusty)\nAllegiant(kitty)\nSoundless(kitty)\nSanitate(kitty, gusty)\nDiarrhetic(gusty) -> Ensure(gusty, kitty)\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) and Ensure(x, kitty) -> Sanitate(x, gusty))\nSanitate(gusty, kitty) and Ensure(kitty, gusty) -> Spiritise(gusty, kitty)\nforall x (Severed(x) -> Spiritise(x, kitty))\nSanitate(kitty, gusty) and Sanitate(gusty, kitty) -> Allegiant(kitty)\nEnsure(gusty, kitty) and Ensure(kitty, gusty) -> Natural(kitty)\nforall x (Spiritise(x, gusty) and Allegiant(x) -> Diarrhetic(gusty))\nforall x (Sanitate(x, kitty) and Spiritise(x, kitty) -> Spiritise(x, gusty))\n\nSanitate(kitty, kitty)\n\nSanitate(kitty, kitty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The shamit is maritime. The shamit reconcile the korrie. The korrie velcro the shamit. The korrie swirl the shamit. The korrie is cultural. The korrie is clashing. The korrie reconcile the shamit. If the shamit is concise then the shamit swirl the korrie. If someone is concise and they eat the korrie then they like the shamit. If the shamit reconcile the korrie and the korrie swirl the shamit then the shamit velcro the korrie. If someone is maritime then they chase the korrie. If the korrie reconcile the shamit and the shamit reconcile the korrie then the korrie is cultural. If the shamit swirl the korrie and the korrie swirl the shamit then the korrie is patented. If someone velcro the shamit and they are cultural then the shamit is concise. If someone reconcile the korrie and they chase the korrie then they chase the shamit. The korrie is not maritime.", "logic": "\nMaritime(shamit)\nReconcile(shamit, korrie)\nVelcro(korrie, shamit)\nSwirl(korrie, shamit)\nCultural(korrie)\nClashing(korrie)\nReconcile(korrie, shamit)\nConcise(shamit) -> Swirl(shamit, korrie)\nforall x (Concise(x) and Swirl(x, korrie) -> Reconcile(x, shamit))\nReconcile(shamit, korrie) and Swirl(korrie, shamit) -> Velcro(shamit, korrie)\nforall x (Maritime(x) -> Velcro(x, korrie))\nReconcile(korrie, shamit) and Reconcile(shamit, korrie) -> Cultural(korrie)\nSwirl(shamit, korrie) and Swirl(korrie, shamit) -> Patented(korrie)\nforall x (Velcro(x, shamit) and Cultural(x) -> Concise(shamit))\nforall x (Reconcile(x, korrie) and Velcro(x, korrie) -> Velcro(x, shamit))\n\nnot Maritime(korrie)\n\nnot Maritime(korrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The ralf is monodic. The ralf devilize the lucie. The lucie paint the ralf. The lucie ridge the ralf. The lucie is prenatal. The lucie is feudal. The lucie devilize the ralf. If the ralf is bandaged then the ralf ridge the lucie. If someone is bandaged and they eat the lucie then they like the ralf. If the ralf devilize the lucie and the lucie ridge the ralf then the ralf paint the lucie. If someone is monodic then they chase the lucie. If the lucie devilize the ralf and the ralf devilize the lucie then the lucie is prenatal. If the ralf ridge the lucie and the lucie ridge the ralf then the lucie is unavowed. If someone paint the ralf and they are prenatal then the ralf is bandaged. If someone devilize the lucie and they chase the lucie then they chase the ralf. The ralf is prenatal.", "logic": "\nMonodic(ralf)\nDevilize(ralf, lucie)\nPaint(lucie, ralf)\nRidge(lucie, ralf)\nPrenatal(lucie)\nFeudal(lucie)\nDevilize(lucie, ralf)\nBandaged(ralf) -> Ridge(ralf, lucie)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) and Ridge(x, lucie) -> Devilize(x, ralf))\nDevilize(ralf, lucie) and Ridge(lucie, ralf) -> Paint(ralf, lucie)\nforall x (Monodic(x) -> Paint(x, lucie))\nDevilize(lucie, ralf) and Devilize(ralf, lucie) -> Prenatal(lucie)\nRidge(ralf, lucie) and Ridge(lucie, ralf) -> Unavowed(lucie)\nforall x (Paint(x, ralf) and Prenatal(x) -> Bandaged(ralf))\nforall x (Devilize(x, lucie) and Paint(x, lucie) -> Paint(x, ralf))\n\nPrenatal(ralf)\n\nPrenatal(ralf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The brigitta is oiled. The brigitta shoo the ambrose. The ambrose pinpoint the brigitta. The ambrose envenom the brigitta. The ambrose is starry. The ambrose is ellipsoid. The ambrose shoo the brigitta. If the brigitta is lissom then the brigitta envenom the ambrose. If someone is lissom and they eat the ambrose then they like the brigitta. If the brigitta shoo the ambrose and the ambrose envenom the brigitta then the brigitta pinpoint the ambrose. If someone is oiled then they chase the ambrose. If the ambrose shoo the brigitta and the brigitta shoo the ambrose then the ambrose is starry. If the brigitta envenom the ambrose and the ambrose envenom the brigitta then the ambrose is benthal. If someone pinpoint the brigitta and they are starry then the brigitta is lissom. If someone shoo the ambrose and they chase the ambrose then they chase the brigitta. The brigitta is not benthal.", "logic": "\nOiled(brigitta)\nShoo(brigitta, ambrose)\nPinpoint(ambrose, brigitta)\nEnvenom(ambrose, brigitta)\nStarry(ambrose)\nEllipsoid(ambrose)\nShoo(ambrose, brigitta)\nLissom(brigitta) -> Envenom(brigitta, ambrose)\nforall x (Lissom(x) and Envenom(x, ambrose) -> Shoo(x, brigitta))\nShoo(brigitta, ambrose) and Envenom(ambrose, brigitta) -> Pinpoint(brigitta, ambrose)\nforall x (Oiled(x) -> Pinpoint(x, ambrose))\nShoo(ambrose, brigitta) and Shoo(brigitta, ambrose) -> Starry(ambrose)\nEnvenom(brigitta, ambrose) and Envenom(ambrose, brigitta) -> Benthal(ambrose)\nforall x (Pinpoint(x, brigitta) and Starry(x) -> Lissom(brigitta))\nforall x (Shoo(x, ambrose) and Pinpoint(x, ambrose) -> Pinpoint(x, brigitta))\n\nnot Benthal(brigitta)\n\nnot Benthal(brigitta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The jobye is paleozoic. The jobye wring the huey. The huey drain the jobye. The huey archaise the jobye. The huey is libyan. The huey is aboveboard. The huey wring the jobye. If the jobye is unbitter then the jobye archaise the huey. If someone is unbitter and they eat the huey then they like the jobye. If the jobye wring the huey and the huey archaise the jobye then the jobye drain the huey. If someone is paleozoic then they chase the huey. If the huey wring the jobye and the jobye wring the huey then the huey is libyan. If the jobye archaise the huey and the huey archaise the jobye then the huey is jeering. If someone drain the jobye and they are libyan then the jobye is unbitter. If someone wring the huey and they chase the huey then they chase the jobye. The jobye is aboveboard.", "logic": "\nPaleozoic(jobye)\nWring(jobye, huey)\nDrain(huey, jobye)\nArchaise(huey, jobye)\nLibyan(huey)\nAboveboard(huey)\nWring(huey, jobye)\nUnbitter(jobye) -> Archaise(jobye, huey)\nforall x (Unbitter(x) and Archaise(x, huey) -> Wring(x, jobye))\nWring(jobye, huey) and Archaise(huey, jobye) -> Drain(jobye, huey)\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) -> Drain(x, huey))\nWring(huey, jobye) and Wring(jobye, huey) -> Libyan(huey)\nArchaise(jobye, huey) and Archaise(huey, jobye) -> Jeering(huey)\nforall x (Drain(x, jobye) and Libyan(x) -> Unbitter(jobye))\nforall x (Wring(x, huey) and Drain(x, huey) -> Drain(x, jobye))\n\nAboveboard(jobye)\n\nAboveboard(jobye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "Marysa is fighting. Marysa is ectopic. Marysa is christless. If Marysa is fighting and Marysa is christless then Marysa is ectopic. If something is kashmiri and maverick then it is fighting. If Marysa is maverick and Marysa is ectopic then Marysa is not fighting. Smart things are kashmiri. Furry things are christless. If something is ectopic then it is quantal. If something is kashmiri and fighting then it is slippered. All slippered things are ectopic. Marysa is fighting.", "logic": "\nFighting(marysa)\nEctopic(marysa)\nChristless(marysa)\nFighting(marysa) and Christless(marysa) -> Ectopic(marysa)\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) and Maverick(x) -> Fighting(x))\nMaverick(marysa) and Ectopic(marysa) -> not Fighting(marysa)\nforall x (Quantal(x) -> Kashmiri(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) -> Christless(x))\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Quantal(x))\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) and Fighting(x) -> Slippered(x))\nforall x (Slippered(x) -> Ectopic(x))\n\nFighting(marysa)\n\ntherefore Fighting(marysa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Binky is sickly. Binky is avionic. Binky is nilotic. If Binky is sickly and Binky is nilotic then Binky is avionic. If something is phobic and puny then it is sickly. If Binky is puny and Binky is avionic then Binky is not sickly. Smart things are phobic. Furry things are nilotic. If something is avionic then it is affected. If something is phobic and sickly then it is opaque. All opaque things are avionic. Binky is not avionic.", "logic": "\nSickly(binky)\nAvionic(binky)\nNilotic(binky)\nSickly(binky) and Nilotic(binky) -> Avionic(binky)\nforall x (Phobic(x) and Puny(x) -> Sickly(x))\nPuny(binky) and Avionic(binky) -> not Sickly(binky)\nforall x (Affected(x) -> Phobic(x))\nforall x (Sickly(x) -> Nilotic(x))\nforall x (Avionic(x) -> Affected(x))\nforall x (Phobic(x) and Sickly(x) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) -> Avionic(x))\n\nnot Avionic(binky)\n\ntherefore Avionic(binky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Pierre is leeward. Pierre is redbrick. Pierre is clubfooted. If Pierre is leeward and Pierre is clubfooted then Pierre is redbrick. If something is kitschy and apophatic then it is leeward. If Pierre is apophatic and Pierre is redbrick then Pierre is not leeward. Smart things are kitschy. Furry things are clubfooted. If something is redbrick then it is waterless. If something is kitschy and leeward then it is corvine. All corvine things are redbrick. Pierre is waterless.", "logic": "\nLeeward(pierre)\nRedbrick(pierre)\nClubfooted(pierre)\nLeeward(pierre) and Clubfooted(pierre) -> Redbrick(pierre)\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Apophatic(x) -> Leeward(x))\nApophatic(pierre) and Redbrick(pierre) -> not Leeward(pierre)\nforall x (Waterless(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Clubfooted(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) -> Waterless(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Leeward(x) -> Corvine(x))\nforall x (Corvine(x) -> Redbrick(x))\n\nWaterless(pierre)\n\nRedbrick(pierre) and forall x (Redbrick(x) -> Waterless(x)) -> therefore Waterless(pierre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Sharna is humongous. Sharna is elated. Sharna is granulose. If Sharna is humongous and Sharna is granulose then Sharna is elated. If something is lacrimal and snowy then it is humongous. If Sharna is snowy and Sharna is elated then Sharna is not humongous. Smart things are lacrimal. Furry things are granulose. If something is elated then it is augustan. If something is lacrimal and humongous then it is excused. All excused things are elated. Sharna is not augustan.", "logic": "\nHumongous(sharna)\nElated(sharna)\nGranulose(sharna)\nHumongous(sharna) and Granulose(sharna) -> Elated(sharna)\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Snowy(x) -> Humongous(x))\nSnowy(sharna) and Elated(sharna) -> not Humongous(sharna)\nforall x (Augustan(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Humongous(x) -> Granulose(x))\nforall x (Elated(x) -> Augustan(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Humongous(x) -> Excused(x))\nforall x (Excused(x) -> Elated(x))\n\nnot Augustan(sharna)\n\nElated(sharna) and forall x (Elated(x) -> Augustan(x)) -> therefore Augustan(sharna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Jillane is auxinic. Jillane is polygenic. Jillane is infective. If Jillane is auxinic and Jillane is infective then Jillane is polygenic. If something is latin and false then it is auxinic. If Jillane is false and Jillane is polygenic then Jillane is not auxinic. Smart things are latin. Furry things are infective. If something is polygenic then it is pubescent. If something is latin and auxinic then it is overarm. All overarm things are polygenic. Jillane is latin.", "logic": "\nAuxinic(jillane)\nPolygenic(jillane)\nInfective(jillane)\nAuxinic(jillane) and Infective(jillane) -> Polygenic(jillane)\nforall x (Latin(x) and False(x) -> Auxinic(x))\nFalse(jillane) and Polygenic(jillane) -> not Auxinic(jillane)\nforall x (Pubescent(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Polygenic(x) -> Pubescent(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) and Auxinic(x) -> Overarm(x))\nforall x (Overarm(x) -> Polygenic(x))\n\nLatin(jillane)\n\nPolygenic(jillane) and forall x (Polygenic(x) -> Pubescent(x)) -> therefore Pubescent(jillane) Pubescent(jillane) and forall x (Pubescent(x) -> Latin(x)) -> therefore Latin(jillane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Karena is crusted. Karena is drupaceous. Karena is fruiting. If Karena is crusted and Karena is fruiting then Karena is drupaceous. If something is lengthwise and perennial then it is crusted. If Karena is perennial and Karena is drupaceous then Karena is not crusted. Smart things are lengthwise. Furry things are fruiting. If something is drupaceous then it is synoecious. If something is lengthwise and crusted then it is periodical. All periodical things are drupaceous. Karena is not lengthwise.", "logic": "\nCrusted(karena)\nDrupaceous(karena)\nFruiting(karena)\nCrusted(karena) and Fruiting(karena) -> Drupaceous(karena)\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) and Perennial(x) -> Crusted(x))\nPerennial(karena) and Drupaceous(karena) -> not Crusted(karena)\nforall x (Synoecious(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nforall x (Crusted(x) -> Fruiting(x))\nforall x (Drupaceous(x) -> Synoecious(x))\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) and Crusted(x) -> Periodical(x))\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Drupaceous(x))\n\nnot Lengthwise(karena)\n\nDrupaceous(karena) and forall x (Drupaceous(x) -> Synoecious(x)) -> therefore Synoecious(karena) Synoecious(karena) and forall x (Synoecious(x) -> Lengthwise(x)) -> therefore Lengthwise(karena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Kendall is expositive. Kendall is ageless. Kendall is chesty. If Kendall is expositive and Kendall is chesty then Kendall is ageless. If something is unsatiated and homy then it is expositive. If Kendall is homy and Kendall is ageless then Kendall is not expositive. Smart things are unsatiated. Furry things are chesty. If something is ageless then it is harried. If something is unsatiated and expositive then it is cambrian. All cambrian things are ageless. Kendall is cambrian.", "logic": "\nExpositive(kendall)\nAgeless(kendall)\nChesty(kendall)\nExpositive(kendall) and Chesty(kendall) -> Ageless(kendall)\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) and Homy(x) -> Expositive(x))\nHomy(kendall) and Ageless(kendall) -> not Expositive(kendall)\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Expositive(x) -> Chesty(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Harried(x))\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) and Expositive(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) -> Ageless(x))\n\nCambrian(kendall)\n\nAgeless(kendall) and forall x (Ageless(x) -> Harried(x)) -> therefore Harried(kendall) Harried(kendall) and forall x (Harried(x) -> Unsatiated(x)) -> therefore Unsatiated(kendall) Unsatiated(kendall) and Expositive(kendall) and forall x (Unsatiated(x) and Expositive(x) -> Cambrian(x)) -> therefore Cambrian(kendall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Jammie is wicked. Jammie is axiomatic. Jammie is hammy. If Jammie is wicked and Jammie is hammy then Jammie is axiomatic. If something is semiweekly and muhammadan then it is wicked. If Jammie is muhammadan and Jammie is axiomatic then Jammie is not wicked. Smart things are semiweekly. Furry things are hammy. If something is axiomatic then it is vociferous. If something is semiweekly and wicked then it is posterior. All posterior things are axiomatic. Jammie is not posterior.", "logic": "\nWicked(jammie)\nAxiomatic(jammie)\nHammy(jammie)\nWicked(jammie) and Hammy(jammie) -> Axiomatic(jammie)\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) and Muhammadan(x) -> Wicked(x))\nMuhammadan(jammie) and Axiomatic(jammie) -> not Wicked(jammie)\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Wicked(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Axiomatic(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) and Wicked(x) -> Posterior(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Axiomatic(x))\n\nnot Posterior(jammie)\n\nAxiomatic(jammie) and forall x (Axiomatic(x) -> Vociferous(x)) -> therefore Vociferous(jammie) Vociferous(jammie) and forall x (Vociferous(x) -> Semiweekly(x)) -> therefore Semiweekly(jammie) Semiweekly(jammie) and Wicked(jammie) and forall x (Semiweekly(x) and Wicked(x) -> Posterior(x)) -> therefore Posterior(jammie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "The darsie urge the alyson. The alyson is chilly. The alyson apportion the darsie. If something is sibyllic then it is vietnamese. If something delineate the darsie then it is colourful. If the darsie is sibyllic then the darsie apportion the alyson. If something delineate the alyson then the alyson is sibyllic. If something is chilly then it delineate the alyson. If something apportion the darsie then the darsie delineate the alyson. If something urge the alyson and it delineate the darsie then the alyson urge the darsie. If something urge the alyson then the alyson urge the darsie. The alyson apportion the darsie.", "logic": "\nUrge(darsie, alyson)\nChilly(alyson)\nApportion(alyson, darsie)\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) -> Vietnamese(x))\nforall x (Delineate(x, darsie) -> Colourful(x))\nSibyllic(darsie) -> Apportion(darsie, alyson)\nforall x (Delineate(x, alyson) -> Sibyllic(alyson))\nforall x (Chilly(x) -> Delineate(x, alyson))\nforall x (Apportion(x, darsie) -> Delineate(darsie, alyson))\nforall x (Urge(x, alyson) and Delineate(x, darsie) -> Urge(alyson, darsie))\nforall x (Urge(x, alyson) -> Urge(alyson, darsie))\n\nApportion(alyson, darsie)\n\ntherefore Apportion(alyson, darsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The harlie critique the vicky. The vicky is vile. The vicky hamstring the harlie. If something is ascendable then it is hind. If something bespangle the harlie then it is porcine. If the harlie is ascendable then the harlie hamstring the vicky. If something bespangle the vicky then the vicky is ascendable. If something is vile then it bespangle the vicky. If something hamstring the harlie then the harlie bespangle the vicky. If something critique the vicky and it bespangle the harlie then the vicky critique the harlie. If something critique the vicky then the vicky critique the harlie. The vicky does not visit the harlie.", "logic": "\nCritique(harlie, vicky)\nVile(vicky)\nHamstring(vicky, harlie)\nforall x (Ascendable(x) -> Hind(x))\nforall x (Bespangle(x, harlie) -> Porcine(x))\nAscendable(harlie) -> Hamstring(harlie, vicky)\nforall x (Bespangle(x, vicky) -> Ascendable(vicky))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Bespangle(x, vicky))\nforall x (Hamstring(x, harlie) -> Bespangle(harlie, vicky))\nforall x (Critique(x, vicky) and Bespangle(x, harlie) -> Critique(vicky, harlie))\nforall x (Critique(x, vicky) -> Critique(vicky, harlie))\n\nnot Hamstring(vicky, harlie)\n\ntherefore Hamstring(vicky, harlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The malka waitress the wynny. The wynny is nonexempt. The wynny chirp the malka. If something is unsocial then it is yelled. If something fuse the malka then it is chagrined. If the malka is unsocial then the malka chirp the wynny. If something fuse the wynny then the wynny is unsocial. If something is nonexempt then it fuse the wynny. If something chirp the malka then the malka fuse the wynny. If something waitress the wynny and it fuse the malka then the wynny waitress the malka. If something waitress the wynny then the wynny waitress the malka. The wynny fuse the wynny.", "logic": "\nWaitress(malka, wynny)\nNonexempt(wynny)\nChirp(wynny, malka)\nforall x (Unsocial(x) -> Yelled(x))\nforall x (Fuse(x, malka) -> Chagrined(x))\nUnsocial(malka) -> Chirp(malka, wynny)\nforall x (Fuse(x, wynny) -> Unsocial(wynny))\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Fuse(x, wynny))\nforall x (Chirp(x, malka) -> Fuse(malka, wynny))\nforall x (Waitress(x, wynny) and Fuse(x, malka) -> Waitress(wynny, malka))\nforall x (Waitress(x, wynny) -> Waitress(wynny, malka))\n\nFuse(wynny, wynny)\n\nNonexempt(wynny) and forall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Fuse(x, wynny)) -> therefore Fuse(wynny, wynny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The sherilyn pause the kellie. The kellie is unitary. The kellie reassign the sherilyn. If something is sinewy then it is laboured. If something tiller the sherilyn then it is murky. If the sherilyn is sinewy then the sherilyn reassign the kellie. If something tiller the kellie then the kellie is sinewy. If something is unitary then it tiller the kellie. If something reassign the sherilyn then the sherilyn tiller the kellie. If something pause the kellie and it tiller the sherilyn then the kellie pause the sherilyn. If something pause the kellie then the kellie pause the sherilyn. The kellie does not chase the sherilyn.", "logic": "\nPause(sherilyn, kellie)\nUnitary(kellie)\nReassign(kellie, sherilyn)\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Laboured(x))\nforall x (Tiller(x, sherilyn) -> Murky(x))\nSinewy(sherilyn) -> Reassign(sherilyn, kellie)\nforall x (Tiller(x, kellie) -> Sinewy(kellie))\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Tiller(x, kellie))\nforall x (Reassign(x, sherilyn) -> Tiller(sherilyn, kellie))\nforall x (Pause(x, kellie) and Tiller(x, sherilyn) -> Pause(kellie, sherilyn))\nforall x (Pause(x, kellie) -> Pause(kellie, sherilyn))\n\nnot Pause(kellie, sherilyn)\n\nPause(sherilyn, kellie) and forall x (Pause(x, kellie) -> Pause(kellie, sherilyn)) -> therefore Pause(kellie, sherilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The lisabeth ridge the derek. The derek is even. The derek visualize the lisabeth. If something is tilted then it is smarmy. If something district the lisabeth then it is mortuary. If the lisabeth is tilted then the lisabeth visualize the derek. If something district the derek then the derek is tilted. If something is even then it district the derek. If something visualize the lisabeth then the lisabeth district the derek. If something ridge the derek and it district the lisabeth then the derek ridge the lisabeth. If something ridge the derek then the derek ridge the lisabeth. The derek is tilted.", "logic": "\nRidge(lisabeth, derek)\nEven(derek)\nVisualize(derek, lisabeth)\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Smarmy(x))\nforall x (District(x, lisabeth) -> Mortuary(x))\nTilted(lisabeth) -> Visualize(lisabeth, derek)\nforall x (District(x, derek) -> Tilted(derek))\nforall x (Even(x) -> District(x, derek))\nforall x (Visualize(x, lisabeth) -> District(lisabeth, derek))\nforall x (Ridge(x, derek) and District(x, lisabeth) -> Ridge(derek, lisabeth))\nforall x (Ridge(x, derek) -> Ridge(derek, lisabeth))\n\nTilted(derek)\n\nEven(derek) and forall x (Even(x) -> District(x, derek)) -> therefore District(derek, derek) District(derek, derek) and forall x (District(x, derek) -> Tilted(derek)) -> therefore Tilted(derek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The marquita crab the lambert. The lambert is supposable. The lambert exhort the marquita. If something is traitorous then it is mendicant. If something meditate the marquita then it is erotic. If the marquita is traitorous then the marquita exhort the lambert. If something meditate the lambert then the lambert is traitorous. If something is supposable then it meditate the lambert. If something exhort the marquita then the marquita meditate the lambert. If something crab the lambert and it meditate the marquita then the lambert crab the marquita. If something crab the lambert then the lambert crab the marquita. The lambert is not traitorous.", "logic": "\nCrab(marquita, lambert)\nSupposable(lambert)\nExhort(lambert, marquita)\nforall x (Traitorous(x) -> Mendicant(x))\nforall x (Meditate(x, marquita) -> Erotic(x))\nTraitorous(marquita) -> Exhort(marquita, lambert)\nforall x (Meditate(x, lambert) -> Traitorous(lambert))\nforall x (Supposable(x) -> Meditate(x, lambert))\nforall x (Exhort(x, marquita) -> Meditate(marquita, lambert))\nforall x (Crab(x, lambert) and Meditate(x, marquita) -> Crab(lambert, marquita))\nforall x (Crab(x, lambert) -> Crab(lambert, marquita))\n\nnot Traitorous(lambert)\n\nSupposable(lambert) and forall x (Supposable(x) -> Meditate(x, lambert)) -> therefore Meditate(lambert, lambert) Meditate(lambert, lambert) and forall x (Meditate(x, lambert) -> Traitorous(lambert)) -> therefore Traitorous(lambert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The travers aggregate the danelle. The danelle is nourished. The danelle pluralise the travers. If something is activated then it is hearable. If something repercuss the travers then it is stabilized. If the travers is activated then the travers pluralise the danelle. If something repercuss the danelle then the danelle is activated. If something is nourished then it repercuss the danelle. If something pluralise the travers then the travers repercuss the danelle. If something aggregate the danelle and it repercuss the travers then the danelle aggregate the travers. If something aggregate the danelle then the danelle aggregate the travers. The danelle is hearable.", "logic": "\nAggregate(travers, danelle)\nNourished(danelle)\nPluralise(danelle, travers)\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, travers) -> Stabilized(x))\nActivated(travers) -> Pluralise(travers, danelle)\nforall x (Repercuss(x, danelle) -> Activated(danelle))\nforall x (Nourished(x) -> Repercuss(x, danelle))\nforall x (Pluralise(x, travers) -> Repercuss(travers, danelle))\nforall x (Aggregate(x, danelle) and Repercuss(x, travers) -> Aggregate(danelle, travers))\nforall x (Aggregate(x, danelle) -> Aggregate(danelle, travers))\n\nHearable(danelle)\n\nNourished(danelle) and forall x (Nourished(x) -> Repercuss(x, danelle)) -> therefore Repercuss(danelle, danelle) Repercuss(danelle, danelle) and forall x (Repercuss(x, danelle) -> Activated(danelle)) -> therefore Activated(danelle) Activated(danelle) and forall x (Activated(x) -> Hearable(x)) -> therefore Hearable(danelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The mikako lurch the bettie. The bettie is bogus. The bettie italicize the mikako. If something is exalting then it is spoken. If something gouge the mikako then it is fertile. If the mikako is exalting then the mikako italicize the bettie. If something gouge the bettie then the bettie is exalting. If something is bogus then it gouge the bettie. If something italicize the mikako then the mikako gouge the bettie. If something lurch the bettie and it gouge the mikako then the bettie lurch the mikako. If something lurch the bettie then the bettie lurch the mikako. The bettie is not spoken.", "logic": "\nLurch(mikako, bettie)\nBogus(bettie)\nItalicize(bettie, mikako)\nforall x (Exalting(x) -> Spoken(x))\nforall x (Gouge(x, mikako) -> Fertile(x))\nExalting(mikako) -> Italicize(mikako, bettie)\nforall x (Gouge(x, bettie) -> Exalting(bettie))\nforall x (Bogus(x) -> Gouge(x, bettie))\nforall x (Italicize(x, mikako) -> Gouge(mikako, bettie))\nforall x (Lurch(x, bettie) and Gouge(x, mikako) -> Lurch(bettie, mikako))\nforall x (Lurch(x, bettie) -> Lurch(bettie, mikako))\n\nnot Spoken(bettie)\n\nBogus(bettie) and forall x (Bogus(x) -> Gouge(x, bettie)) -> therefore Gouge(bettie, bettie) Gouge(bettie, bettie) and forall x (Gouge(x, bettie) -> Exalting(bettie)) -> therefore Exalting(bettie) Exalting(bettie) and forall x (Exalting(x) -> Spoken(x)) -> therefore Spoken(bettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The stephana remediate the yule. The yule is semiweekly. The yule unlearn the stephana. If something is resonant then it is bespoken. If something refracture the stephana then it is amino. If the stephana is resonant then the stephana unlearn the yule. If something refracture the yule then the yule is resonant. If something is semiweekly then it refracture the yule. If something unlearn the stephana then the stephana refracture the yule. If something remediate the yule and it refracture the stephana then the yule remediate the stephana. If something remediate the yule then the yule remediate the stephana. The stephana does not visit the yule.", "logic": "\nRemediate(stephana, yule)\nSemiweekly(yule)\nUnlearn(yule, stephana)\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Refracture(x, stephana) -> Amino(x))\nResonant(stephana) -> Unlearn(stephana, yule)\nforall x (Refracture(x, yule) -> Resonant(yule))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Refracture(x, yule))\nforall x (Unlearn(x, stephana) -> Refracture(stephana, yule))\nforall x (Remediate(x, yule) and Refracture(x, stephana) -> Remediate(yule, stephana))\nforall x (Remediate(x, yule) -> Remediate(yule, stephana))\n\nnot Unlearn(stephana, yule)\n\nResonant(stephana) -> Unlearn(stephana, yule) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The giffard booze the fraser. The fraser is waterless. The fraser lenify the giffard. If something is inverse then it is drastic. If something coexist the giffard then it is foliated. If the giffard is inverse then the giffard lenify the fraser. If something coexist the fraser then the fraser is inverse. If something is waterless then it coexist the fraser. If something lenify the giffard then the giffard coexist the fraser. If something booze the fraser and it coexist the giffard then the fraser booze the giffard. If something booze the fraser then the fraser booze the giffard. The giffard is drastic.", "logic": "\nBooze(giffard, fraser)\nWaterless(fraser)\nLenify(fraser, giffard)\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Drastic(x))\nforall x (Coexist(x, giffard) -> Foliated(x))\nInverse(giffard) -> Lenify(giffard, fraser)\nforall x (Coexist(x, fraser) -> Inverse(fraser))\nforall x (Waterless(x) -> Coexist(x, fraser))\nforall x (Lenify(x, giffard) -> Coexist(giffard, fraser))\nforall x (Booze(x, fraser) and Coexist(x, giffard) -> Booze(fraser, giffard))\nforall x (Booze(x, fraser) -> Booze(fraser, giffard))\n\nDrastic(giffard)\n\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Drastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The lorenzo impel the barclay. The barclay is undamaged. The barclay dogfight the lorenzo. If something is inveterate then it is azoic. If something attain the lorenzo then it is idealistic. If the lorenzo is inveterate then the lorenzo dogfight the barclay. If something attain the barclay then the barclay is inveterate. If something is undamaged then it attain the barclay. If something dogfight the lorenzo then the lorenzo attain the barclay. If something impel the barclay and it attain the lorenzo then the barclay impel the lorenzo. If something impel the barclay then the barclay impel the lorenzo. The barclay is not idealistic.", "logic": "\nImpel(lorenzo, barclay)\nUndamaged(barclay)\nDogfight(barclay, lorenzo)\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Azoic(x))\nforall x (Attain(x, lorenzo) -> Idealistic(x))\nInveterate(lorenzo) -> Dogfight(lorenzo, barclay)\nforall x (Attain(x, barclay) -> Inveterate(barclay))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) -> Attain(x, barclay))\nforall x (Dogfight(x, lorenzo) -> Attain(lorenzo, barclay))\nforall x (Impel(x, barclay) and Attain(x, lorenzo) -> Impel(barclay, lorenzo))\nforall x (Impel(x, barclay) -> Impel(barclay, lorenzo))\n\nnot Idealistic(barclay)\n\nforall x (Attain(x, lorenzo) -> Idealistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The wendell sweat the geraldo. The geraldo is costal. The geraldo beam the wendell. If something is uncoloured then it is rich. If something export the wendell then it is selfsame. If the wendell is uncoloured then the wendell beam the geraldo. If something export the geraldo then the geraldo is uncoloured. If something is costal then it export the geraldo. If something beam the wendell then the wendell export the geraldo. If something sweat the geraldo and it export the wendell then the geraldo sweat the wendell. If something sweat the geraldo then the geraldo sweat the wendell. The wendell is selfsame.", "logic": "\nSweat(wendell, geraldo)\nCostal(geraldo)\nBeam(geraldo, wendell)\nforall x (Uncoloured(x) -> Rich(x))\nforall x (Export(x, wendell) -> Selfsame(x))\nUncoloured(wendell) -> Beam(wendell, geraldo)\nforall x (Export(x, geraldo) -> Uncoloured(geraldo))\nforall x (Costal(x) -> Export(x, geraldo))\nforall x (Beam(x, wendell) -> Export(wendell, geraldo))\nforall x (Sweat(x, geraldo) and Export(x, wendell) -> Sweat(geraldo, wendell))\nforall x (Sweat(x, geraldo) -> Sweat(geraldo, wendell))\n\nSelfsame(wendell)\n\nforall x (Export(x, wendell) -> Selfsame(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The ranna accede the osbourn. The osbourn is uncounted. The osbourn defy the ranna. If something is eruptive then it is cozy. If something unpin the ranna then it is respondent. If the ranna is eruptive then the ranna defy the osbourn. If something unpin the osbourn then the osbourn is eruptive. If something is uncounted then it unpin the osbourn. If something defy the ranna then the ranna unpin the osbourn. If something accede the osbourn and it unpin the ranna then the osbourn accede the ranna. If something accede the osbourn then the osbourn accede the ranna. The osbourn is not rough.", "logic": "\nAccede(ranna, osbourn)\nUncounted(osbourn)\nDefy(osbourn, ranna)\nforall x (Eruptive(x) -> Cozy(x))\nforall x (Unpin(x, ranna) -> Respondent(x))\nEruptive(ranna) -> Defy(ranna, osbourn)\nforall x (Unpin(x, osbourn) -> Eruptive(osbourn))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Unpin(x, osbourn))\nforall x (Defy(x, ranna) -> Unpin(ranna, osbourn))\nforall x (Accede(x, osbourn) and Unpin(x, ranna) -> Accede(osbourn, ranna))\nforall x (Accede(x, osbourn) -> Accede(osbourn, ranna))\n\nnot Rough(osbourn)\n\nnot Rough(osbourn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The malissia whinny the norman. The norman is unloaded. The norman intoxicate the malissia. If something is headlong then it is smooth. If something remove the malissia then it is palatine. If the malissia is headlong then the malissia intoxicate the norman. If something remove the norman then the norman is headlong. If something is unloaded then it remove the norman. If something intoxicate the malissia then the malissia remove the norman. If something whinny the norman and it remove the malissia then the norman whinny the malissia. If something whinny the norman then the norman whinny the malissia. The norman intoxicate the norman.", "logic": "\nWhinny(malissia, norman)\nUnloaded(norman)\nIntoxicate(norman, malissia)\nforall x (Headlong(x) -> Smooth(x))\nforall x (Remove(x, malissia) -> Palatine(x))\nHeadlong(malissia) -> Intoxicate(malissia, norman)\nforall x (Remove(x, norman) -> Headlong(norman))\nforall x (Unloaded(x) -> Remove(x, norman))\nforall x (Intoxicate(x, malissia) -> Remove(malissia, norman))\nforall x (Whinny(x, norman) and Remove(x, malissia) -> Whinny(norman, malissia))\nforall x (Whinny(x, norman) -> Whinny(norman, malissia))\n\nIntoxicate(norman, norman)\n\nIntoxicate(norman, norman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The elna winterize the gwennie. The gwennie is whatsoever. The gwennie embolden the elna. If something is healed then it is presumable. If something coax the elna then it is epimorphic. If the elna is healed then the elna embolden the gwennie. If something coax the gwennie then the gwennie is healed. If something is whatsoever then it coax the gwennie. If something embolden the elna then the elna coax the gwennie. If something winterize the gwennie and it coax the elna then the gwennie winterize the elna. If something winterize the gwennie then the gwennie winterize the elna. The gwennie does not eat the elna.", "logic": "\nWinterize(elna, gwennie)\nWhatsoever(gwennie)\nEmbolden(gwennie, elna)\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Coax(x, elna) -> Epimorphic(x))\nHealed(elna) -> Embolden(elna, gwennie)\nforall x (Coax(x, gwennie) -> Healed(gwennie))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Coax(x, gwennie))\nforall x (Embolden(x, elna) -> Coax(elna, gwennie))\nforall x (Winterize(x, gwennie) and Coax(x, elna) -> Winterize(gwennie, elna))\nforall x (Winterize(x, gwennie) -> Winterize(gwennie, elna))\n\nnot Coax(gwennie, elna)\n\nnot Coax(gwennie, elna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The shimon endanger the tine. The tine is bulky. The tine equip the shimon. If something is abstract then it is recognised. If something mapquest the shimon then it is northeast. If the shimon is abstract then the shimon equip the tine. If something mapquest the tine then the tine is abstract. If something is bulky then it mapquest the tine. If something equip the shimon then the shimon mapquest the tine. If something endanger the tine and it mapquest the shimon then the tine endanger the shimon. If something endanger the tine then the tine endanger the shimon. The tine endanger the tine.", "logic": "\nEndanger(shimon, tine)\nBulky(tine)\nEquip(tine, shimon)\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Mapquest(x, shimon) -> Northeast(x))\nAbstract(shimon) -> Equip(shimon, tine)\nforall x (Mapquest(x, tine) -> Abstract(tine))\nforall x (Bulky(x) -> Mapquest(x, tine))\nforall x (Equip(x, shimon) -> Mapquest(shimon, tine))\nforall x (Endanger(x, tine) and Mapquest(x, shimon) -> Endanger(tine, shimon))\nforall x (Endanger(x, tine) -> Endanger(tine, shimon))\n\nEndanger(tine, tine)\n\nEndanger(tine, tine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The vikki does not eat the abbe. The vikki does not eat the leontyne. The vikki is ordinal. The vikki is horrified. The vikki is jaundiced. The vikki double the abbe. The vikki double the leontyne. The boyd cinematise the vikki. The boyd hoover the abbe. The boyd does not visit the vikki. The boyd double the leontyne. The abbe double the vikki. The leontyne does not eat the abbe. The leontyne is alvine. The leontyne hoover the boyd. The leontyne double the abbe. If something double the boyd and the boyd double the abbe then the abbe cinematise the leontyne. If the boyd cinematise the abbe then the boyd does not like the abbe. If something double the abbe then it double the leontyne. If the vikki cinematise the boyd and the boyd double the leontyne then the leontyne is winded. If something is winded then it is ordinal. If something double the vikki then the vikki cinematise the boyd. If something is horrified and it hoover the abbe then it cinematise the leontyne. If something cinematise the vikki and it does not visit the leontyne then the leontyne hoover the abbe. The leontyne hoover the boyd.", "logic": "\nnot Cinematise(vikki, abbe)\nnot Cinematise(vikki, leontyne)\nOrdinal(vikki)\nHorrified(vikki)\nJaundiced(vikki)\nDouble(vikki, abbe)\nDouble(vikki, leontyne)\nCinematise(boyd, vikki)\nHoover(boyd, abbe)\nnot Double(boyd, vikki)\nDouble(boyd, leontyne)\nDouble(abbe, vikki)\nnot Cinematise(leontyne, abbe)\nAlvine(leontyne)\nHoover(leontyne, boyd)\nDouble(leontyne, abbe)\nforall x (Double(x, boyd) and Double(boyd, abbe) -> Cinematise(abbe, leontyne))\nCinematise(boyd, abbe) -> not Hoover(boyd, abbe)\nforall x (Double(x, abbe) -> Double(x, leontyne))\nCinematise(vikki, boyd) and Double(boyd, leontyne) -> Winded(leontyne)\nforall x (Winded(x) -> Ordinal(x))\nforall x (Double(x, vikki) -> Cinematise(vikki, boyd))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Hoover(x, abbe) -> Cinematise(x, leontyne))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, vikki) and not Double(x, leontyne) -> Hoover(leontyne, abbe))\n\nHoover(leontyne, boyd)\n\ntherefore Hoover(leontyne, boyd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The murdoch does not eat the abbi. The murdoch does not eat the thibaud. The murdoch is salty. The murdoch is crumbly. The murdoch is plentiful. The murdoch negative the abbi. The murdoch negative the thibaud. The kalil halter the murdoch. The kalil induct the abbi. The kalil does not visit the murdoch. The kalil negative the thibaud. The abbi negative the murdoch. The thibaud does not eat the abbi. The thibaud is condign. The thibaud induct the kalil. The thibaud negative the abbi. If something negative the kalil and the kalil negative the abbi then the abbi halter the thibaud. If the kalil halter the abbi then the kalil does not like the abbi. If something negative the abbi then it negative the thibaud. If the murdoch halter the kalil and the kalil negative the thibaud then the thibaud is petrifying. If something is petrifying then it is salty. If something negative the murdoch then the murdoch halter the kalil. If something is crumbly and it induct the abbi then it halter the thibaud. If something halter the murdoch and it does not visit the thibaud then the thibaud induct the abbi. The thibaud does not like the kalil.", "logic": "\nnot Halter(murdoch, abbi)\nnot Halter(murdoch, thibaud)\nSalty(murdoch)\nCrumbly(murdoch)\nPlentiful(murdoch)\nNegative(murdoch, abbi)\nNegative(murdoch, thibaud)\nHalter(kalil, murdoch)\nInduct(kalil, abbi)\nnot Negative(kalil, murdoch)\nNegative(kalil, thibaud)\nNegative(abbi, murdoch)\nnot Halter(thibaud, abbi)\nCondign(thibaud)\nInduct(thibaud, kalil)\nNegative(thibaud, abbi)\nforall x (Negative(x, kalil) and Negative(kalil, abbi) -> Halter(abbi, thibaud))\nHalter(kalil, abbi) -> not Induct(kalil, abbi)\nforall x (Negative(x, abbi) -> Negative(x, thibaud))\nHalter(murdoch, kalil) and Negative(kalil, thibaud) -> Petrifying(thibaud)\nforall x (Petrifying(x) -> Salty(x))\nforall x (Negative(x, murdoch) -> Halter(murdoch, kalil))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Induct(x, abbi) -> Halter(x, thibaud))\nforall x (Halter(x, murdoch) and not Negative(x, thibaud) -> Induct(thibaud, abbi))\n\nnot Induct(thibaud, kalil)\n\ntherefore Induct(thibaud, kalil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The gregory does not eat the agata. The gregory does not eat the marve. The gregory is undatable. The gregory is apophyseal. The gregory is forthright. The gregory colly the agata. The gregory colly the marve. The hewe sclaff the gregory. The hewe ginger the agata. The hewe does not visit the gregory. The hewe colly the marve. The agata colly the gregory. The marve does not eat the agata. The marve is drooping. The marve ginger the hewe. The marve colly the agata. If something colly the hewe and the hewe colly the agata then the agata sclaff the marve. If the hewe sclaff the agata then the hewe does not like the agata. If something colly the agata then it colly the marve. If the gregory sclaff the hewe and the hewe colly the marve then the marve is asymmetric. If something is asymmetric then it is undatable. If something colly the gregory then the gregory sclaff the hewe. If something is apophyseal and it ginger the agata then it sclaff the marve. If something sclaff the gregory and it does not visit the marve then the marve ginger the agata. The gregory sclaff the hewe.", "logic": "\nnot Sclaff(gregory, agata)\nnot Sclaff(gregory, marve)\nUndatable(gregory)\nApophyseal(gregory)\nForthright(gregory)\nColly(gregory, agata)\nColly(gregory, marve)\nSclaff(hewe, gregory)\nGinger(hewe, agata)\nnot Colly(hewe, gregory)\nColly(hewe, marve)\nColly(agata, gregory)\nnot Sclaff(marve, agata)\nDrooping(marve)\nGinger(marve, hewe)\nColly(marve, agata)\nforall x (Colly(x, hewe) and Colly(hewe, agata) -> Sclaff(agata, marve))\nSclaff(hewe, agata) -> not Ginger(hewe, agata)\nforall x (Colly(x, agata) -> Colly(x, marve))\nSclaff(gregory, hewe) and Colly(hewe, marve) -> Asymmetric(marve)\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) -> Undatable(x))\nforall x (Colly(x, gregory) -> Sclaff(gregory, hewe))\nforall x (Apophyseal(x) and Ginger(x, agata) -> Sclaff(x, marve))\nforall x (Sclaff(x, gregory) and not Colly(x, marve) -> Ginger(marve, agata))\n\nSclaff(gregory, hewe)\n\nColly(agata, gregory) and forall x (Colly(x, gregory) -> Sclaff(gregory, hewe)) -> therefore Sclaff(gregory, hewe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The devinne does not eat the melonie. The devinne does not eat the parsifal. The devinne is appraising. The devinne is unburied. The devinne is gabby. The devinne dehisce the melonie. The devinne dehisce the parsifal. The kati assist the devinne. The kati transfer the melonie. The kati does not visit the devinne. The kati dehisce the parsifal. The melonie dehisce the devinne. The parsifal does not eat the melonie. The parsifal is addable. The parsifal transfer the kati. The parsifal dehisce the melonie. If something dehisce the kati and the kati dehisce the melonie then the melonie assist the parsifal. If the kati assist the melonie then the kati does not like the melonie. If something dehisce the melonie then it dehisce the parsifal. If the devinne assist the kati and the kati dehisce the parsifal then the parsifal is congruous. If something is congruous then it is appraising. If something dehisce the devinne then the devinne assist the kati. If something is unburied and it transfer the melonie then it assist the parsifal. If something assist the devinne and it does not visit the parsifal then the parsifal transfer the melonie. The parsifal does not visit the parsifal.", "logic": "\nnot Assist(devinne, melonie)\nnot Assist(devinne, parsifal)\nAppraising(devinne)\nUnburied(devinne)\nGabby(devinne)\nDehisce(devinne, melonie)\nDehisce(devinne, parsifal)\nAssist(kati, devinne)\nTransfer(kati, melonie)\nnot Dehisce(kati, devinne)\nDehisce(kati, parsifal)\nDehisce(melonie, devinne)\nnot Assist(parsifal, melonie)\nAddable(parsifal)\nTransfer(parsifal, kati)\nDehisce(parsifal, melonie)\nforall x (Dehisce(x, kati) and Dehisce(kati, melonie) -> Assist(melonie, parsifal))\nAssist(kati, melonie) -> not Transfer(kati, melonie)\nforall x (Dehisce(x, melonie) -> Dehisce(x, parsifal))\nAssist(devinne, kati) and Dehisce(kati, parsifal) -> Congruous(parsifal)\nforall x (Congruous(x) -> Appraising(x))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, devinne) -> Assist(devinne, kati))\nforall x (Unburied(x) and Transfer(x, melonie) -> Assist(x, parsifal))\nforall x (Assist(x, devinne) and not Dehisce(x, parsifal) -> Transfer(parsifal, melonie))\n\nnot Dehisce(parsifal, parsifal)\n\nDehisce(parsifal, melonie) and forall x (Dehisce(x, melonie) -> Dehisce(x, parsifal)) -> therefore Dehisce(parsifal, parsifal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The vitoria does not eat the raleigh. The vitoria does not eat the zia. The vitoria is adust. The vitoria is rigorous. The vitoria is laborious. The vitoria twiddle the raleigh. The vitoria twiddle the zia. The donia budget the vitoria. The donia plane the raleigh. The donia does not visit the vitoria. The donia twiddle the zia. The raleigh twiddle the vitoria. The zia does not eat the raleigh. The zia is cross. The zia plane the donia. The zia twiddle the raleigh. If something twiddle the donia and the donia twiddle the raleigh then the raleigh budget the zia. If the donia budget the raleigh then the donia does not like the raleigh. If something twiddle the raleigh then it twiddle the zia. If the vitoria budget the donia and the donia twiddle the zia then the zia is pacifist. If something is pacifist then it is adust. If something twiddle the vitoria then the vitoria budget the donia. If something is rigorous and it plane the raleigh then it budget the zia. If something budget the vitoria and it does not visit the zia then the zia plane the raleigh. The zia is pacifist.", "logic": "\nnot Budget(vitoria, raleigh)\nnot Budget(vitoria, zia)\nAdust(vitoria)\nRigorous(vitoria)\nLaborious(vitoria)\nTwiddle(vitoria, raleigh)\nTwiddle(vitoria, zia)\nBudget(donia, vitoria)\nPlane(donia, raleigh)\nnot Twiddle(donia, vitoria)\nTwiddle(donia, zia)\nTwiddle(raleigh, vitoria)\nnot Budget(zia, raleigh)\nCross(zia)\nPlane(zia, donia)\nTwiddle(zia, raleigh)\nforall x (Twiddle(x, donia) and Twiddle(donia, raleigh) -> Budget(raleigh, zia))\nBudget(donia, raleigh) -> not Plane(donia, raleigh)\nforall x (Twiddle(x, raleigh) -> Twiddle(x, zia))\nBudget(vitoria, donia) and Twiddle(donia, zia) -> Pacifist(zia)\nforall x (Pacifist(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Twiddle(x, vitoria) -> Budget(vitoria, donia))\nforall x (Rigorous(x) and Plane(x, raleigh) -> Budget(x, zia))\nforall x (Budget(x, vitoria) and not Twiddle(x, zia) -> Plane(zia, raleigh))\n\nPacifist(zia)\n\nTwiddle(raleigh, vitoria) and forall x (Twiddle(x, vitoria) -> Budget(vitoria, donia)) -> therefore Budget(vitoria, donia) Budget(vitoria, donia) and Twiddle(donia, zia) and Budget(vitoria, donia) and Twiddle(donia, zia) -> Pacifist(zia) -> therefore Pacifist(zia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The sergeant does not eat the shalne. The sergeant does not eat the jay. The sergeant is pitiable. The sergeant is papuan. The sergeant is cycloidal. The sergeant dillydally the shalne. The sergeant dillydally the jay. The myrta ankylose the sergeant. The myrta sharpshoot the shalne. The myrta does not visit the sergeant. The myrta dillydally the jay. The shalne dillydally the sergeant. The jay does not eat the shalne. The jay is epistemic. The jay sharpshoot the myrta. The jay dillydally the shalne. If something dillydally the myrta and the myrta dillydally the shalne then the shalne ankylose the jay. If the myrta ankylose the shalne then the myrta does not like the shalne. If something dillydally the shalne then it dillydally the jay. If the sergeant ankylose the myrta and the myrta dillydally the jay then the jay is isometric. If something is isometric then it is pitiable. If something dillydally the sergeant then the sergeant ankylose the myrta. If something is papuan and it sharpshoot the shalne then it ankylose the jay. If something ankylose the sergeant and it does not visit the jay then the jay sharpshoot the shalne. The jay is not isometric.", "logic": "\nnot Ankylose(sergeant, shalne)\nnot Ankylose(sergeant, jay)\nPitiable(sergeant)\nPapuan(sergeant)\nCycloidal(sergeant)\nDillydally(sergeant, shalne)\nDillydally(sergeant, jay)\nAnkylose(myrta, sergeant)\nSharpshoot(myrta, shalne)\nnot Dillydally(myrta, sergeant)\nDillydally(myrta, jay)\nDillydally(shalne, sergeant)\nnot Ankylose(jay, shalne)\nEpistemic(jay)\nSharpshoot(jay, myrta)\nDillydally(jay, shalne)\nforall x (Dillydally(x, myrta) and Dillydally(myrta, shalne) -> Ankylose(shalne, jay))\nAnkylose(myrta, shalne) -> not Sharpshoot(myrta, shalne)\nforall x (Dillydally(x, shalne) -> Dillydally(x, jay))\nAnkylose(sergeant, myrta) and Dillydally(myrta, jay) -> Isometric(jay)\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, sergeant) -> Ankylose(sergeant, myrta))\nforall x (Papuan(x) and Sharpshoot(x, shalne) -> Ankylose(x, jay))\nforall x (Ankylose(x, sergeant) and not Dillydally(x, jay) -> Sharpshoot(jay, shalne))\n\nnot Isometric(jay)\n\nDillydally(shalne, sergeant) and forall x (Dillydally(x, sergeant) -> Ankylose(sergeant, myrta)) -> therefore Ankylose(sergeant, myrta) Ankylose(sergeant, myrta) and Dillydally(myrta, jay) and Ankylose(sergeant, myrta) and Dillydally(myrta, jay) -> Isometric(jay) -> therefore Isometric(jay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The zahara does not eat the ibby. The zahara does not eat the emmery. The zahara is agelong. The zahara is unawed. The zahara is upcoming. The zahara calculate the ibby. The zahara calculate the emmery. The paola strop the zahara. The paola reek the ibby. The paola does not visit the zahara. The paola calculate the emmery. The ibby calculate the zahara. The emmery does not eat the ibby. The emmery is coniferous. The emmery reek the paola. The emmery calculate the ibby. If something calculate the paola and the paola calculate the ibby then the ibby strop the emmery. If the paola strop the ibby then the paola does not like the ibby. If something calculate the ibby then it calculate the emmery. If the zahara strop the paola and the paola calculate the emmery then the emmery is attentive. If something is attentive then it is agelong. If something calculate the zahara then the zahara strop the paola. If something is unawed and it reek the ibby then it strop the emmery. If something strop the zahara and it does not visit the emmery then the emmery reek the ibby. The emmery is agelong.", "logic": "\nnot Strop(zahara, ibby)\nnot Strop(zahara, emmery)\nAgelong(zahara)\nUnawed(zahara)\nUpcoming(zahara)\nCalculate(zahara, ibby)\nCalculate(zahara, emmery)\nStrop(paola, zahara)\nReek(paola, ibby)\nnot Calculate(paola, zahara)\nCalculate(paola, emmery)\nCalculate(ibby, zahara)\nnot Strop(emmery, ibby)\nConiferous(emmery)\nReek(emmery, paola)\nCalculate(emmery, ibby)\nforall x (Calculate(x, paola) and Calculate(paola, ibby) -> Strop(ibby, emmery))\nStrop(paola, ibby) -> not Reek(paola, ibby)\nforall x (Calculate(x, ibby) -> Calculate(x, emmery))\nStrop(zahara, paola) and Calculate(paola, emmery) -> Attentive(emmery)\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Agelong(x))\nforall x (Calculate(x, zahara) -> Strop(zahara, paola))\nforall x (Unawed(x) and Reek(x, ibby) -> Strop(x, emmery))\nforall x (Strop(x, zahara) and not Calculate(x, emmery) -> Reek(emmery, ibby))\n\nAgelong(emmery)\n\nCalculate(ibby, zahara) and forall x (Calculate(x, zahara) -> Strop(zahara, paola)) -> therefore Strop(zahara, paola) Strop(zahara, paola) and Calculate(paola, emmery) and Strop(zahara, paola) and Calculate(paola, emmery) -> Attentive(emmery) -> therefore Attentive(emmery) Attentive(emmery) and forall x (Attentive(x) -> Agelong(x)) -> therefore Agelong(emmery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The rosa does not eat the wenona. The rosa does not eat the fanni. The rosa is idiotic. The rosa is disgraced. The rosa is hipless. The rosa rumor the wenona. The rosa rumor the fanni. The nichols profiteer the rosa. The nichols tussle the wenona. The nichols does not visit the rosa. The nichols rumor the fanni. The wenona rumor the rosa. The fanni does not eat the wenona. The fanni is biogenic. The fanni tussle the nichols. The fanni rumor the wenona. If something rumor the nichols and the nichols rumor the wenona then the wenona profiteer the fanni. If the nichols profiteer the wenona then the nichols does not like the wenona. If something rumor the wenona then it rumor the fanni. If the rosa profiteer the nichols and the nichols rumor the fanni then the fanni is clarion. If something is clarion then it is idiotic. If something rumor the rosa then the rosa profiteer the nichols. If something is disgraced and it tussle the wenona then it profiteer the fanni. If something profiteer the rosa and it does not visit the fanni then the fanni tussle the wenona. The fanni is not idiotic.", "logic": "\nnot Profiteer(rosa, wenona)\nnot Profiteer(rosa, fanni)\nIdiotic(rosa)\nDisgraced(rosa)\nHipless(rosa)\nRumor(rosa, wenona)\nRumor(rosa, fanni)\nProfiteer(nichols, rosa)\nTussle(nichols, wenona)\nnot Rumor(nichols, rosa)\nRumor(nichols, fanni)\nRumor(wenona, rosa)\nnot Profiteer(fanni, wenona)\nBiogenic(fanni)\nTussle(fanni, nichols)\nRumor(fanni, wenona)\nforall x (Rumor(x, nichols) and Rumor(nichols, wenona) -> Profiteer(wenona, fanni))\nProfiteer(nichols, wenona) -> not Tussle(nichols, wenona)\nforall x (Rumor(x, wenona) -> Rumor(x, fanni))\nProfiteer(rosa, nichols) and Rumor(nichols, fanni) -> Clarion(fanni)\nforall x (Clarion(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Rumor(x, rosa) -> Profiteer(rosa, nichols))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) and Tussle(x, wenona) -> Profiteer(x, fanni))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, rosa) and not Rumor(x, fanni) -> Tussle(fanni, wenona))\n\nnot Idiotic(fanni)\n\nRumor(wenona, rosa) and forall x (Rumor(x, rosa) -> Profiteer(rosa, nichols)) -> therefore Profiteer(rosa, nichols) Profiteer(rosa, nichols) and Rumor(nichols, fanni) and Profiteer(rosa, nichols) and Rumor(nichols, fanni) -> Clarion(fanni) -> therefore Clarion(fanni) Clarion(fanni) and forall x (Clarion(x) -> Idiotic(x)) -> therefore Idiotic(fanni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The cindee does not eat the emanuel. The cindee does not eat the mari. The cindee is blessed. The cindee is irregular. The cindee is saponified. The cindee fish the emanuel. The cindee fish the mari. The selia socialize the cindee. The selia skim the emanuel. The selia does not visit the cindee. The selia fish the mari. The emanuel fish the cindee. The mari does not eat the emanuel. The mari is madagascan. The mari skim the selia. The mari fish the emanuel. If something fish the selia and the selia fish the emanuel then the emanuel socialize the mari. If the selia socialize the emanuel then the selia does not like the emanuel. If something fish the emanuel then it fish the mari. If the cindee socialize the selia and the selia fish the mari then the mari is penumbral. If something is penumbral then it is blessed. If something fish the cindee then the cindee socialize the selia. If something is irregular and it skim the emanuel then it socialize the mari. If something socialize the cindee and it does not visit the mari then the mari skim the emanuel. The emanuel does not visit the mari.", "logic": "\nnot Socialize(cindee, emanuel)\nnot Socialize(cindee, mari)\nBlessed(cindee)\nIrregular(cindee)\nSaponified(cindee)\nFish(cindee, emanuel)\nFish(cindee, mari)\nSocialize(selia, cindee)\nSkim(selia, emanuel)\nnot Fish(selia, cindee)\nFish(selia, mari)\nFish(emanuel, cindee)\nnot Socialize(mari, emanuel)\nMadagascan(mari)\nSkim(mari, selia)\nFish(mari, emanuel)\nforall x (Fish(x, selia) and Fish(selia, emanuel) -> Socialize(emanuel, mari))\nSocialize(selia, emanuel) -> not Skim(selia, emanuel)\nforall x (Fish(x, emanuel) -> Fish(x, mari))\nSocialize(cindee, selia) and Fish(selia, mari) -> Penumbral(mari)\nforall x (Penumbral(x) -> Blessed(x))\nforall x (Fish(x, cindee) -> Socialize(cindee, selia))\nforall x (Irregular(x) and Skim(x, emanuel) -> Socialize(x, mari))\nforall x (Socialize(x, cindee) and not Fish(x, mari) -> Skim(mari, emanuel))\n\nnot Fish(emanuel, mari)\n\nforall x (Fish(x, emanuel) -> Fish(x, mari)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The deeann does not eat the amie. The deeann does not eat the bert. The deeann is biennial. The deeann is prototypal. The deeann is cesarian. The deeann vandalise the amie. The deeann vandalise the bert. The holley band the deeann. The holley lodge the amie. The holley does not visit the deeann. The holley vandalise the bert. The amie vandalise the deeann. The bert does not eat the amie. The bert is flaunty. The bert lodge the holley. The bert vandalise the amie. If something vandalise the holley and the holley vandalise the amie then the amie band the bert. If the holley band the amie then the holley does not like the amie. If something vandalise the amie then it vandalise the bert. If the deeann band the holley and the holley vandalise the bert then the bert is unattired. If something is unattired then it is biennial. If something vandalise the deeann then the deeann band the holley. If something is prototypal and it lodge the amie then it band the bert. If something band the deeann and it does not visit the bert then the bert lodge the amie. The holley is biennial.", "logic": "\nnot Band(deeann, amie)\nnot Band(deeann, bert)\nBiennial(deeann)\nPrototypal(deeann)\nCesarian(deeann)\nVandalise(deeann, amie)\nVandalise(deeann, bert)\nBand(holley, deeann)\nLodge(holley, amie)\nnot Vandalise(holley, deeann)\nVandalise(holley, bert)\nVandalise(amie, deeann)\nnot Band(bert, amie)\nFlaunty(bert)\nLodge(bert, holley)\nVandalise(bert, amie)\nforall x (Vandalise(x, holley) and Vandalise(holley, amie) -> Band(amie, bert))\nBand(holley, amie) -> not Lodge(holley, amie)\nforall x (Vandalise(x, amie) -> Vandalise(x, bert))\nBand(deeann, holley) and Vandalise(holley, bert) -> Unattired(bert)\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Biennial(x))\nforall x (Vandalise(x, deeann) -> Band(deeann, holley))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) and Lodge(x, amie) -> Band(x, bert))\nforall x (Band(x, deeann) and not Vandalise(x, bert) -> Lodge(bert, amie))\n\nBiennial(holley)\n\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Biennial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The lorna does not eat the kincaid. The lorna does not eat the rubia. The lorna is vivid. The lorna is albinic. The lorna is unfit. The lorna comminate the kincaid. The lorna comminate the rubia. The lorna posit the lorna. The lorna perfuse the kincaid. The lorna does not visit the lorna. The lorna comminate the rubia. The kincaid comminate the lorna. The rubia does not eat the kincaid. The rubia is rhenish. The rubia perfuse the lorna. The rubia comminate the kincaid. If something comminate the lorna and the lorna comminate the kincaid then the kincaid posit the rubia. If the lorna posit the kincaid then the lorna does not like the kincaid. If something comminate the kincaid then it comminate the rubia. If the lorna posit the lorna and the lorna comminate the rubia then the rubia is proclaimed. If something is proclaimed then it is vivid. If something comminate the lorna then the lorna posit the lorna. If something is albinic and it perfuse the kincaid then it posit the rubia. If something posit the lorna and it does not visit the rubia then the rubia perfuse the kincaid. The kincaid is not vivid.", "logic": "\nnot Posit(lorna, kincaid)\nnot Posit(lorna, rubia)\nVivid(lorna)\nAlbinic(lorna)\nUnfit(lorna)\nComminate(lorna, kincaid)\nComminate(lorna, rubia)\nPosit(lorna, lorna)\nPerfuse(lorna, kincaid)\nnot Comminate(lorna, lorna)\nComminate(lorna, rubia)\nComminate(kincaid, lorna)\nnot Posit(rubia, kincaid)\nRhenish(rubia)\nPerfuse(rubia, lorna)\nComminate(rubia, kincaid)\nforall x (Comminate(x, lorna) and Comminate(lorna, kincaid) -> Posit(kincaid, rubia))\nPosit(lorna, kincaid) -> not Perfuse(lorna, kincaid)\nforall x (Comminate(x, kincaid) -> Comminate(x, rubia))\nPosit(lorna, lorna) and Comminate(lorna, rubia) -> Proclaimed(rubia)\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Comminate(x, lorna) -> Posit(lorna, lorna))\nforall x (Albinic(x) and Perfuse(x, kincaid) -> Posit(x, rubia))\nforall x (Posit(x, lorna) and not Comminate(x, rubia) -> Perfuse(rubia, kincaid))\n\nnot Vivid(kincaid)\n\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) -> Vivid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The geneva does not eat the deane. The geneva does not eat the analiese. The geneva is antitumour. The geneva is lidded. The geneva is monoatomic. The geneva legitimize the deane. The geneva legitimize the analiese. The kalvin dismember the geneva. The kalvin bluster the deane. The kalvin does not visit the geneva. The kalvin legitimize the analiese. The deane legitimize the geneva. The analiese does not eat the deane. The analiese is bootless. The analiese bluster the kalvin. The analiese legitimize the deane. If something legitimize the kalvin and the kalvin legitimize the deane then the deane dismember the analiese. If the kalvin dismember the deane then the kalvin does not like the deane. If something legitimize the deane then it legitimize the analiese. If the geneva dismember the kalvin and the kalvin legitimize the analiese then the analiese is indictable. If something is indictable then it is antitumour. If something legitimize the geneva then the geneva dismember the kalvin. If something is lidded and it bluster the deane then it dismember the analiese. If something dismember the geneva and it does not visit the analiese then the analiese bluster the deane. The kalvin dismember the analiese.", "logic": "\nnot Dismember(geneva, deane)\nnot Dismember(geneva, analiese)\nAntitumour(geneva)\nLidded(geneva)\nMonoatomic(geneva)\nLegitimize(geneva, deane)\nLegitimize(geneva, analiese)\nDismember(kalvin, geneva)\nBluster(kalvin, deane)\nnot Legitimize(kalvin, geneva)\nLegitimize(kalvin, analiese)\nLegitimize(deane, geneva)\nnot Dismember(analiese, deane)\nBootless(analiese)\nBluster(analiese, kalvin)\nLegitimize(analiese, deane)\nforall x (Legitimize(x, kalvin) and Legitimize(kalvin, deane) -> Dismember(deane, analiese))\nDismember(kalvin, deane) -> not Bluster(kalvin, deane)\nforall x (Legitimize(x, deane) -> Legitimize(x, analiese))\nDismember(geneva, kalvin) and Legitimize(kalvin, analiese) -> Indictable(analiese)\nforall x (Indictable(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Legitimize(x, geneva) -> Dismember(geneva, kalvin))\nforall x (Lidded(x) and Bluster(x, deane) -> Dismember(x, analiese))\nforall x (Dismember(x, geneva) and not Legitimize(x, analiese) -> Bluster(analiese, deane))\n\nDismember(kalvin, analiese)\n\nforall x (Lidded(x) and Bluster(x, deane) -> Dismember(x, analiese)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The melody does not eat the carmina. The melody does not eat the billie. The melody is depictive. The melody is ungrateful. The melody is frozen. The melody hydrolyse the carmina. The melody hydrolyse the billie. The pearle unlock the melody. The pearle inoculate the carmina. The pearle does not visit the melody. The pearle hydrolyse the billie. The carmina hydrolyse the melody. The billie does not eat the carmina. The billie is tensed. The billie inoculate the pearle. The billie hydrolyse the carmina. If something hydrolyse the pearle and the pearle hydrolyse the carmina then the carmina unlock the billie. If the pearle unlock the carmina then the pearle does not like the carmina. If something hydrolyse the carmina then it hydrolyse the billie. If the melody unlock the pearle and the pearle hydrolyse the billie then the billie is juicy. If something is juicy then it is depictive. If something hydrolyse the melody then the melody unlock the pearle. If something is ungrateful and it inoculate the carmina then it unlock the billie. If something unlock the melody and it does not visit the billie then the billie inoculate the carmina. The melody does not like the melody.", "logic": "\nnot Unlock(melody, carmina)\nnot Unlock(melody, billie)\nDepictive(melody)\nUngrateful(melody)\nFrozen(melody)\nHydrolyse(melody, carmina)\nHydrolyse(melody, billie)\nUnlock(pearle, melody)\nInoculate(pearle, carmina)\nnot Hydrolyse(pearle, melody)\nHydrolyse(pearle, billie)\nHydrolyse(carmina, melody)\nnot Unlock(billie, carmina)\nTensed(billie)\nInoculate(billie, pearle)\nHydrolyse(billie, carmina)\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, pearle) and Hydrolyse(pearle, carmina) -> Unlock(carmina, billie))\nUnlock(pearle, carmina) -> not Inoculate(pearle, carmina)\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, carmina) -> Hydrolyse(x, billie))\nUnlock(melody, pearle) and Hydrolyse(pearle, billie) -> Juicy(billie)\nforall x (Juicy(x) -> Depictive(x))\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, melody) -> Unlock(melody, pearle))\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) and Inoculate(x, carmina) -> Unlock(x, billie))\nforall x (Unlock(x, melody) and not Hydrolyse(x, billie) -> Inoculate(billie, carmina))\n\nnot Inoculate(melody, melody)\n\nnot Inoculate(melody, melody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The carleen does not eat the karalynn. The carleen does not eat the kathrine. The carleen is itchy. The carleen is thriftless. The carleen is cavernous. The carleen misapply the karalynn. The carleen misapply the kathrine. The dari chine the carleen. The dari spray the karalynn. The dari does not visit the carleen. The dari misapply the kathrine. The karalynn misapply the carleen. The kathrine does not eat the karalynn. The kathrine is casual. The kathrine spray the dari. The kathrine misapply the karalynn. If something misapply the dari and the dari misapply the karalynn then the karalynn chine the kathrine. If the dari chine the karalynn then the dari does not like the karalynn. If something misapply the karalynn then it misapply the kathrine. If the carleen chine the dari and the dari misapply the kathrine then the kathrine is angelic. If something is angelic then it is itchy. If something misapply the carleen then the carleen chine the dari. If something is thriftless and it spray the karalynn then it chine the kathrine. If something chine the carleen and it does not visit the kathrine then the kathrine spray the karalynn. The carleen is casual.", "logic": "\nnot Chine(carleen, karalynn)\nnot Chine(carleen, kathrine)\nItchy(carleen)\nThriftless(carleen)\nCavernous(carleen)\nMisapply(carleen, karalynn)\nMisapply(carleen, kathrine)\nChine(dari, carleen)\nSpray(dari, karalynn)\nnot Misapply(dari, carleen)\nMisapply(dari, kathrine)\nMisapply(karalynn, carleen)\nnot Chine(kathrine, karalynn)\nCasual(kathrine)\nSpray(kathrine, dari)\nMisapply(kathrine, karalynn)\nforall x (Misapply(x, dari) and Misapply(dari, karalynn) -> Chine(karalynn, kathrine))\nChine(dari, karalynn) -> not Spray(dari, karalynn)\nforall x (Misapply(x, karalynn) -> Misapply(x, kathrine))\nChine(carleen, dari) and Misapply(dari, kathrine) -> Angelic(kathrine)\nforall x (Angelic(x) -> Itchy(x))\nforall x (Misapply(x, carleen) -> Chine(carleen, dari))\nforall x (Thriftless(x) and Spray(x, karalynn) -> Chine(x, kathrine))\nforall x (Chine(x, carleen) and not Misapply(x, kathrine) -> Spray(kathrine, karalynn))\n\nCasual(carleen)\n\nCasual(carleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The estell does not eat the benn. The estell does not eat the albatros. The estell is void. The estell is adhesive. The estell is goddamned. The estell free the benn. The estell free the albatros. The kin discover the estell. The kin twinkle the benn. The kin does not visit the estell. The kin free the albatros. The benn free the estell. The albatros does not eat the benn. The albatros is bold. The albatros twinkle the kin. The albatros free the benn. If something free the kin and the kin free the benn then the benn discover the albatros. If the kin discover the benn then the kin does not like the benn. If something free the benn then it free the albatros. If the estell discover the kin and the kin free the albatros then the albatros is violent. If something is violent then it is void. If something free the estell then the estell discover the kin. If something is adhesive and it twinkle the benn then it discover the albatros. If something discover the estell and it does not visit the albatros then the albatros twinkle the benn. The kin does not eat the benn.", "logic": "\nnot Discover(estell, benn)\nnot Discover(estell, albatros)\nVoid(estell)\nAdhesive(estell)\nGoddamned(estell)\nFree(estell, benn)\nFree(estell, albatros)\nDiscover(kin, estell)\nTwinkle(kin, benn)\nnot Free(kin, estell)\nFree(kin, albatros)\nFree(benn, estell)\nnot Discover(albatros, benn)\nBold(albatros)\nTwinkle(albatros, kin)\nFree(albatros, benn)\nforall x (Free(x, kin) and Free(kin, benn) -> Discover(benn, albatros))\nDiscover(kin, benn) -> not Twinkle(kin, benn)\nforall x (Free(x, benn) -> Free(x, albatros))\nDiscover(estell, kin) and Free(kin, albatros) -> Violent(albatros)\nforall x (Violent(x) -> Void(x))\nforall x (Free(x, estell) -> Discover(estell, kin))\nforall x (Adhesive(x) and Twinkle(x, benn) -> Discover(x, albatros))\nforall x (Discover(x, estell) and not Free(x, albatros) -> Twinkle(albatros, benn))\n\nnot Discover(kin, benn)\n\nnot Discover(kin, benn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The karee does not eat the emmott. The karee does not eat the donia. The karee is barbellate. The karee is flattering. The karee is sightly. The karee chondrify the emmott. The karee chondrify the donia. The wyatan consider the karee. The wyatan bronze the emmott. The wyatan does not visit the karee. The wyatan chondrify the donia. The emmott chondrify the karee. The donia does not eat the emmott. The donia is coccal. The donia bronze the wyatan. The donia chondrify the emmott. If something chondrify the wyatan and the wyatan chondrify the emmott then the emmott consider the donia. If the wyatan consider the emmott then the wyatan does not like the emmott. If something chondrify the emmott then it chondrify the donia. If the karee consider the wyatan and the wyatan chondrify the donia then the donia is anterior. If something is anterior then it is barbellate. If something chondrify the karee then the karee consider the wyatan. If something is flattering and it bronze the emmott then it consider the donia. If something consider the karee and it does not visit the donia then the donia bronze the emmott. The donia is flattering.", "logic": "\nnot Consider(karee, emmott)\nnot Consider(karee, donia)\nBarbellate(karee)\nFlattering(karee)\nSightly(karee)\nChondrify(karee, emmott)\nChondrify(karee, donia)\nConsider(wyatan, karee)\nBronze(wyatan, emmott)\nnot Chondrify(wyatan, karee)\nChondrify(wyatan, donia)\nChondrify(emmott, karee)\nnot Consider(donia, emmott)\nCoccal(donia)\nBronze(donia, wyatan)\nChondrify(donia, emmott)\nforall x (Chondrify(x, wyatan) and Chondrify(wyatan, emmott) -> Consider(emmott, donia))\nConsider(wyatan, emmott) -> not Bronze(wyatan, emmott)\nforall x (Chondrify(x, emmott) -> Chondrify(x, donia))\nConsider(karee, wyatan) and Chondrify(wyatan, donia) -> Anterior(donia)\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Barbellate(x))\nforall x (Chondrify(x, karee) -> Consider(karee, wyatan))\nforall x (Flattering(x) and Bronze(x, emmott) -> Consider(x, donia))\nforall x (Consider(x, karee) and not Chondrify(x, donia) -> Bronze(donia, emmott))\n\nFlattering(donia)\n\nFlattering(donia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "Redmond is ovarian. Redmond is not snappy. Herminia is not ovarian. Herminia is corsican. Herminia is not snappy. Herminia is thirteen. Penn is not snappy. Isabella is ovarian. Isabella is not monoatomic. Isabella is corsican. Isabella is snappy. Isabella is retrousse. If Penn is ovarian and Penn is wellborn then Penn is retrousse. All ovarian, retrousse people are thirteen. If someone is retrousse and ovarian then they are thirteen. All ovarian people are corsican. Round, snappy people are retrousse. All corsican people are retrousse. Herminia is not ovarian.", "logic": "\nOvarian(redmond)\nnot Snappy(redmond)\nnot Ovarian(herminia)\nCorsican(herminia)\nnot Snappy(herminia)\nThirteen(herminia)\nnot Snappy(penn)\nOvarian(isabella)\nnot Monoatomic(isabella)\nCorsican(isabella)\nSnappy(isabella)\nRetrousse(isabella)\nOvarian(penn) and Wellborn(penn) -> Retrousse(penn)\nforall x (Ovarian(x) and Retrousse(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Retrousse(x) and Ovarian(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) -> Corsican(x))\nforall x (Corsican(x) and Snappy(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Corsican(x) -> Retrousse(x))\n\nnot Ovarian(herminia)\n\ntherefore not Ovarian(herminia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Sterling is solicitous. Sterling is not indelible. Sherrie is not solicitous. Sherrie is resonating. Sherrie is not indelible. Sherrie is burdensome. Vlad is not indelible. Selby is solicitous. Selby is not aweigh. Selby is resonating. Selby is indelible. Selby is tragical. If Vlad is solicitous and Vlad is aramaic then Vlad is tragical. All solicitous, tragical people are burdensome. If someone is tragical and solicitous then they are burdensome. All solicitous people are resonating. Round, indelible people are tragical. All resonating people are tragical. Sherrie is solicitous.", "logic": "\nSolicitous(sterling)\nnot Indelible(sterling)\nnot Solicitous(sherrie)\nResonating(sherrie)\nnot Indelible(sherrie)\nBurdensome(sherrie)\nnot Indelible(vlad)\nSolicitous(selby)\nnot Aweigh(selby)\nResonating(selby)\nIndelible(selby)\nTragical(selby)\nSolicitous(vlad) and Aramaic(vlad) -> Tragical(vlad)\nforall x (Solicitous(x) and Tragical(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Tragical(x) and Solicitous(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Solicitous(x) -> Resonating(x))\nforall x (Resonating(x) and Indelible(x) -> Tragical(x))\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Tragical(x))\n\nSolicitous(sherrie)\n\ntherefore not Solicitous(sherrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Lorilee is welcome. Lorilee is not cleared. Cloe is not welcome. Cloe is proved. Cloe is not cleared. Cloe is caroline. Mariam is not cleared. Anatollo is welcome. Anatollo is not untapped. Anatollo is proved. Anatollo is cleared. Anatollo is burundi. If Mariam is welcome and Mariam is financial then Mariam is burundi. All welcome, burundi people are caroline. If someone is burundi and welcome then they are caroline. All welcome people are proved. Round, cleared people are burundi. All proved people are burundi. Cloe is burundi.", "logic": "\nWelcome(lorilee)\nnot Cleared(lorilee)\nnot Welcome(cloe)\nProved(cloe)\nnot Cleared(cloe)\nCaroline(cloe)\nnot Cleared(mariam)\nWelcome(anatollo)\nnot Untapped(anatollo)\nProved(anatollo)\nCleared(anatollo)\nBurundi(anatollo)\nWelcome(mariam) and Financial(mariam) -> Burundi(mariam)\nforall x (Welcome(x) and Burundi(x) -> Caroline(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) and Welcome(x) -> Caroline(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x) -> Proved(x))\nforall x (Proved(x) and Cleared(x) -> Burundi(x))\nforall x (Proved(x) -> Burundi(x))\n\nBurundi(cloe)\n\nProved(cloe) and forall x (Proved(x) -> Burundi(x)) -> therefore Burundi(cloe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Etty is cinematic. Etty is not cancerous. Sharyl is not cinematic. Sharyl is oppressed. Sharyl is not cancerous. Sharyl is noncyclic. Fortuna is not cancerous. Forbes is cinematic. Forbes is not warty. Forbes is oppressed. Forbes is cancerous. Forbes is seventeen. If Fortuna is cinematic and Fortuna is cozy then Fortuna is seventeen. All cinematic, seventeen people are noncyclic. If someone is seventeen and cinematic then they are noncyclic. All cinematic people are oppressed. Round, cancerous people are seventeen. All oppressed people are seventeen. Etty is not oppressed.", "logic": "\nCinematic(etty)\nnot Cancerous(etty)\nnot Cinematic(sharyl)\nOppressed(sharyl)\nnot Cancerous(sharyl)\nNoncyclic(sharyl)\nnot Cancerous(fortuna)\nCinematic(forbes)\nnot Warty(forbes)\nOppressed(forbes)\nCancerous(forbes)\nSeventeen(forbes)\nCinematic(fortuna) and Cozy(fortuna) -> Seventeen(fortuna)\nforall x (Cinematic(x) and Seventeen(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and Cinematic(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Cinematic(x) -> Oppressed(x))\nforall x (Oppressed(x) and Cancerous(x) -> Seventeen(x))\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Seventeen(x))\n\nnot Oppressed(etty)\n\nCinematic(etty) and forall x (Cinematic(x) -> Oppressed(x)) -> therefore Oppressed(etty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Berk is aldermanly. Berk is not distal. Etty is not aldermanly. Etty is caulked. Etty is not distal. Etty is peregrine. Lissie is not distal. Stepha is aldermanly. Stepha is not somnific. Stepha is caulked. Stepha is distal. Stepha is intent. If Lissie is aldermanly and Lissie is chondritic then Lissie is intent. All aldermanly, intent people are peregrine. If someone is intent and aldermanly then they are peregrine. All aldermanly people are caulked. Round, distal people are intent. All caulked people are intent. Berk is intent.", "logic": "\nAldermanly(berk)\nnot Distal(berk)\nnot Aldermanly(etty)\nCaulked(etty)\nnot Distal(etty)\nPeregrine(etty)\nnot Distal(lissie)\nAldermanly(stepha)\nnot Somnific(stepha)\nCaulked(stepha)\nDistal(stepha)\nIntent(stepha)\nAldermanly(lissie) and Chondritic(lissie) -> Intent(lissie)\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) and Intent(x) -> Peregrine(x))\nforall x (Intent(x) and Aldermanly(x) -> Peregrine(x))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) and Distal(x) -> Intent(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) -> Intent(x))\n\nIntent(berk)\n\nAldermanly(berk) and forall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Caulked(x)) -> therefore Caulked(berk) Caulked(berk) and forall x (Caulked(x) -> Intent(x)) -> therefore Intent(berk)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Elissa is bicorn. Elissa is not hearing. Dawson is not bicorn. Dawson is maudlin. Dawson is not hearing. Dawson is noted. Starla is not hearing. Madelle is bicorn. Madelle is not beholden. Madelle is maudlin. Madelle is hearing. Madelle is indecisive. If Starla is bicorn and Starla is shakeable then Starla is indecisive. All bicorn, indecisive people are noted. If someone is indecisive and bicorn then they are noted. All bicorn people are maudlin. Round, hearing people are indecisive. All maudlin people are indecisive. Elissa is not indecisive.", "logic": "\nBicorn(elissa)\nnot Hearing(elissa)\nnot Bicorn(dawson)\nMaudlin(dawson)\nnot Hearing(dawson)\nNoted(dawson)\nnot Hearing(starla)\nBicorn(madelle)\nnot Beholden(madelle)\nMaudlin(madelle)\nHearing(madelle)\nIndecisive(madelle)\nBicorn(starla) and Shakeable(starla) -> Indecisive(starla)\nforall x (Bicorn(x) and Indecisive(x) -> Noted(x))\nforall x (Indecisive(x) and Bicorn(x) -> Noted(x))\nforall x (Bicorn(x) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Maudlin(x) and Hearing(x) -> Indecisive(x))\nforall x (Maudlin(x) -> Indecisive(x))\n\nnot Indecisive(elissa)\n\nBicorn(elissa) and forall x (Bicorn(x) -> Maudlin(x)) -> therefore Maudlin(elissa) Maudlin(elissa) and forall x (Maudlin(x) -> Indecisive(x)) -> therefore Indecisive(elissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Peirce is close. Peirce is not doltish. Sutton is not close. Sutton is unbiassed. Sutton is not doltish. Sutton is bodiless. Henriette is not doltish. Jacques is close. Jacques is not oxidized. Jacques is unbiassed. Jacques is doltish. Jacques is freshman. If Henriette is close and Henriette is acoustic then Henriette is freshman. All close, freshman people are bodiless. If someone is freshman and close then they are bodiless. All close people are unbiassed. Round, doltish people are freshman. All unbiassed people are freshman. Peirce is bodiless.", "logic": "\nClose(peirce)\nnot Doltish(peirce)\nnot Close(sutton)\nUnbiassed(sutton)\nnot Doltish(sutton)\nBodiless(sutton)\nnot Doltish(henriette)\nClose(jacques)\nnot Oxidized(jacques)\nUnbiassed(jacques)\nDoltish(jacques)\nFreshman(jacques)\nClose(henriette) and Acoustic(henriette) -> Freshman(henriette)\nforall x (Close(x) and Freshman(x) -> Bodiless(x))\nforall x (Freshman(x) and Close(x) -> Bodiless(x))\nforall x (Close(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Doltish(x) -> Freshman(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Freshman(x))\n\nBodiless(peirce)\n\nClose(peirce) and forall x (Close(x) -> Unbiassed(x)) -> therefore Unbiassed(peirce) Unbiassed(peirce) and forall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Freshman(x)) -> therefore Freshman(peirce) Close(peirce) and Freshman(peirce) and forall x (Close(x) and Freshman(x) -> Bodiless(x)) -> therefore Bodiless(peirce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Kingsley is unequal. Kingsley is not uncovered. Adolphus is not unequal. Adolphus is discarded. Adolphus is not uncovered. Adolphus is inshore. Deirdre is not uncovered. Misti is unequal. Misti is not tyrolese. Misti is discarded. Misti is uncovered. Misti is newfangled. If Deirdre is unequal and Deirdre is centroidal then Deirdre is newfangled. All unequal, newfangled people are inshore. If someone is newfangled and unequal then they are inshore. All unequal people are discarded. Round, uncovered people are newfangled. All discarded people are newfangled. Kingsley is not inshore.", "logic": "\nUnequal(kingsley)\nnot Uncovered(kingsley)\nnot Unequal(adolphus)\nDiscarded(adolphus)\nnot Uncovered(adolphus)\nInshore(adolphus)\nnot Uncovered(deirdre)\nUnequal(misti)\nnot Tyrolese(misti)\nDiscarded(misti)\nUncovered(misti)\nNewfangled(misti)\nUnequal(deirdre) and Centroidal(deirdre) -> Newfangled(deirdre)\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Newfangled(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Newfangled(x) and Unequal(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Discarded(x))\nforall x (Discarded(x) and Uncovered(x) -> Newfangled(x))\nforall x (Discarded(x) -> Newfangled(x))\n\nnot Inshore(kingsley)\n\nUnequal(kingsley) and forall x (Unequal(x) -> Discarded(x)) -> therefore Discarded(kingsley) Discarded(kingsley) and forall x (Discarded(x) -> Newfangled(x)) -> therefore Newfangled(kingsley) Unequal(kingsley) and Newfangled(kingsley) and forall x (Unequal(x) and Newfangled(x) -> Inshore(x)) -> therefore Inshore(kingsley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Alden is lutheran. Alden is not rustless. Cyndy is not lutheran. Cyndy is registered. Cyndy is not rustless. Cyndy is oviparous. Elliott is not rustless. Carlynn is lutheran. Carlynn is not weepy. Carlynn is registered. Carlynn is rustless. Carlynn is shapeless. If Elliott is lutheran and Elliott is nude then Elliott is shapeless. All lutheran, shapeless people are oviparous. If someone is shapeless and lutheran then they are oviparous. All lutheran people are registered. Round, rustless people are shapeless. All registered people are shapeless. Elliott is not oviparous.", "logic": "\nLutheran(alden)\nnot Rustless(alden)\nnot Lutheran(cyndy)\nRegistered(cyndy)\nnot Rustless(cyndy)\nOviparous(cyndy)\nnot Rustless(elliott)\nLutheran(carlynn)\nnot Weepy(carlynn)\nRegistered(carlynn)\nRustless(carlynn)\nShapeless(carlynn)\nLutheran(elliott) and Nude(elliott) -> Shapeless(elliott)\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and Shapeless(x) -> Oviparous(x))\nforall x (Shapeless(x) and Lutheran(x) -> Oviparous(x))\nforall x (Lutheran(x) -> Registered(x))\nforall x (Registered(x) and Rustless(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Registered(x) -> Shapeless(x))\n\nnot Oviparous(elliott)\n\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and Shapeless(x) -> Oviparous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Selina is shuttered. Selina is not halcyon. Roth is not shuttered. Roth is salaried. Roth is not halcyon. Roth is older. Marlon is not halcyon. Farah is shuttered. Farah is not fivefold. Farah is salaried. Farah is halcyon. Farah is maxi. If Marlon is shuttered and Marlon is flemish then Marlon is maxi. All shuttered, maxi people are older. If someone is maxi and shuttered then they are older. All shuttered people are salaried. Round, halcyon people are maxi. All salaried people are maxi. Marlon is maxi.", "logic": "\nShuttered(selina)\nnot Halcyon(selina)\nnot Shuttered(roth)\nSalaried(roth)\nnot Halcyon(roth)\nOlder(roth)\nnot Halcyon(marlon)\nShuttered(farah)\nnot Fivefold(farah)\nSalaried(farah)\nHalcyon(farah)\nMaxi(farah)\nShuttered(marlon) and Flemish(marlon) -> Maxi(marlon)\nforall x (Shuttered(x) and Maxi(x) -> Older(x))\nforall x (Maxi(x) and Shuttered(x) -> Older(x))\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Salaried(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) and Halcyon(x) -> Maxi(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Maxi(x))\n\nMaxi(marlon)\n\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Maxi(x)) <- forall x (Shuttered(x) -> Salaried(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Blanch is dressed. Blanch is not serrate. Magnus is not dressed. Magnus is gaumless. Magnus is not serrate. Magnus is resinous. Doralia is not serrate. Sherman is dressed. Sherman is not baggy. Sherman is gaumless. Sherman is serrate. Sherman is rustic. If Doralia is dressed and Doralia is seismal then Doralia is rustic. All dressed, rustic people are resinous. If someone is rustic and dressed then they are resinous. All dressed people are gaumless. Round, serrate people are rustic. All gaumless people are rustic. Doralia is not gaumless.", "logic": "\nDressed(blanch)\nnot Serrate(blanch)\nnot Dressed(magnus)\nGaumless(magnus)\nnot Serrate(magnus)\nResinous(magnus)\nnot Serrate(doralia)\nDressed(sherman)\nnot Baggy(sherman)\nGaumless(sherman)\nSerrate(sherman)\nRustic(sherman)\nDressed(doralia) and Seismal(doralia) -> Rustic(doralia)\nforall x (Dressed(x) and Rustic(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Rustic(x) and Dressed(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Dressed(x) -> Gaumless(x))\nforall x (Gaumless(x) and Serrate(x) -> Rustic(x))\nforall x (Gaumless(x) -> Rustic(x))\n\nnot Gaumless(doralia)\n\nforall x (Dressed(x) -> Gaumless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Kam is cycloidal. Kam is not auburn. Zsazsa is not cycloidal. Zsazsa is adrift. Zsazsa is not auburn. Zsazsa is torulose. Shina is not auburn. Marlo is cycloidal. Marlo is not intertidal. Marlo is adrift. Marlo is auburn. Marlo is agrarian. If Shina is cycloidal and Shina is biform then Shina is agrarian. All cycloidal, agrarian people are torulose. If someone is agrarian and cycloidal then they are torulose. All cycloidal people are adrift. Round, auburn people are agrarian. All adrift people are agrarian. Kam is intertidal.", "logic": "\nCycloidal(kam)\nnot Auburn(kam)\nnot Cycloidal(zsazsa)\nAdrift(zsazsa)\nnot Auburn(zsazsa)\nTorulose(zsazsa)\nnot Auburn(shina)\nCycloidal(marlo)\nnot Intertidal(marlo)\nAdrift(marlo)\nAuburn(marlo)\nAgrarian(marlo)\nCycloidal(shina) and Biform(shina) -> Agrarian(shina)\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) and Agrarian(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) and Cycloidal(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) -> Adrift(x))\nforall x (Adrift(x) and Auburn(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Adrift(x) -> Agrarian(x))\n\nIntertidal(kam)\n\nIntertidal(kam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Dmitri is netlike. Dmitri is not tubed. Hannibal is not netlike. Hannibal is algebraic. Hannibal is not tubed. Hannibal is mendelian. Glennis is not tubed. Colene is netlike. Colene is not wingless. Colene is algebraic. Colene is tubed. Colene is corrupted. If Glennis is netlike and Glennis is slothful then Glennis is corrupted. All netlike, corrupted people are mendelian. If someone is corrupted and netlike then they are mendelian. All netlike people are algebraic. Round, tubed people are corrupted. All algebraic people are corrupted. Hannibal is not slothful.", "logic": "\nNetlike(dmitri)\nnot Tubed(dmitri)\nnot Netlike(hannibal)\nAlgebraic(hannibal)\nnot Tubed(hannibal)\nMendelian(hannibal)\nnot Tubed(glennis)\nNetlike(colene)\nnot Wingless(colene)\nAlgebraic(colene)\nTubed(colene)\nCorrupted(colene)\nNetlike(glennis) and Slothful(glennis) -> Corrupted(glennis)\nforall x (Netlike(x) and Corrupted(x) -> Mendelian(x))\nforall x (Corrupted(x) and Netlike(x) -> Mendelian(x))\nforall x (Netlike(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) and Tubed(x) -> Corrupted(x))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) -> Corrupted(x))\n\nnot Slothful(hannibal)\n\nnot Slothful(hannibal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Hedwig is profligate. Hedwig is not nonracial. Sherry is not profligate. Sherry is cyanogenic. Sherry is not nonracial. Sherry is ransacked. Kristi is not nonracial. Francis is profligate. Francis is not vaccinated. Francis is cyanogenic. Francis is nonracial. Francis is port. If Kristi is profligate and Kristi is associate then Kristi is port. All profligate, port people are ransacked. If someone is port and profligate then they are ransacked. All profligate people are cyanogenic. Round, nonracial people are port. All cyanogenic people are port. Kristi is associate.", "logic": "\nProfligate(hedwig)\nnot Nonracial(hedwig)\nnot Profligate(sherry)\nCyanogenic(sherry)\nnot Nonracial(sherry)\nRansacked(sherry)\nnot Nonracial(kristi)\nProfligate(francis)\nnot Vaccinated(francis)\nCyanogenic(francis)\nNonracial(francis)\nPort(francis)\nProfligate(kristi) and Associate(kristi) -> Port(kristi)\nforall x (Profligate(x) and Port(x) -> Ransacked(x))\nforall x (Port(x) and Profligate(x) -> Ransacked(x))\nforall x (Profligate(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Nonracial(x) -> Port(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) -> Port(x))\n\nAssociate(kristi)\n\nAssociate(kristi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Aphrodite is satyric. Aphrodite is not braised. Avery is not satyric. Avery is knavish. Avery is not braised. Avery is trancelike. Rheta is not braised. Hubert is satyric. Hubert is not principled. Hubert is knavish. Hubert is braised. Hubert is unsatiated. If Rheta is satyric and Rheta is oecumenic then Rheta is unsatiated. All satyric, unsatiated people are trancelike. If someone is unsatiated and satyric then they are trancelike. All satyric people are knavish. Round, braised people are unsatiated. All knavish people are unsatiated. Rheta is not principled.", "logic": "\nSatyric(aphrodite)\nnot Braised(aphrodite)\nnot Satyric(avery)\nKnavish(avery)\nnot Braised(avery)\nTrancelike(avery)\nnot Braised(rheta)\nSatyric(hubert)\nnot Principled(hubert)\nKnavish(hubert)\nBraised(hubert)\nUnsatiated(hubert)\nSatyric(rheta) and Oecumenic(rheta) -> Unsatiated(rheta)\nforall x (Satyric(x) and Unsatiated(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) and Satyric(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) and Braised(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\n\nnot Principled(rheta)\n\nnot Principled(rheta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Desmund is sluggish. Desmund is not calibrated. Ansel is not sluggish. Ansel is played. Ansel is not calibrated. Ansel is trillion. Etti is not calibrated. Rorie is sluggish. Rorie is not fizzing. Rorie is played. Rorie is calibrated. Rorie is plausive. If Etti is sluggish and Etti is affixal then Etti is plausive. All sluggish, plausive people are trillion. If someone is plausive and sluggish then they are trillion. All sluggish people are played. Round, calibrated people are plausive. All played people are plausive. Desmund is affixal.", "logic": "\nSluggish(desmund)\nnot Calibrated(desmund)\nnot Sluggish(ansel)\nPlayed(ansel)\nnot Calibrated(ansel)\nTrillion(ansel)\nnot Calibrated(etti)\nSluggish(rorie)\nnot Fizzing(rorie)\nPlayed(rorie)\nCalibrated(rorie)\nPlausive(rorie)\nSluggish(etti) and Affixal(etti) -> Plausive(etti)\nforall x (Sluggish(x) and Plausive(x) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Plausive(x) and Sluggish(x) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Sluggish(x) -> Played(x))\nforall x (Played(x) and Calibrated(x) -> Plausive(x))\nforall x (Played(x) -> Plausive(x))\n\nAffixal(desmund)\n\nAffixal(desmund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "The joletta spoon the clio. The joletta supple the clio. The clio supple the joletta. If someone spoon the joletta and they visit the clio then the clio spoon the joletta. If someone spoon the joletta and they visit the joletta then they are ptolemaic. If someone supple the clio and they visit the joletta then the clio spoon the joletta. If someone is delineated then they see the clio. If someone supple the joletta then they visit the clio. If someone syncretize the clio then they need the joletta. The clio supple the joletta.", "logic": "\nSpoon(joletta, clio)\nSupple(joletta, clio)\nSupple(clio, joletta)\nforall x (Spoon(x, joletta) and Supple(x, clio) -> Spoon(clio, joletta))\nforall x (Spoon(x, joletta) and Supple(x, joletta) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Supple(x, clio) and Supple(x, joletta) -> Spoon(clio, joletta))\nforall x (Delineated(x) -> Syncretize(x, clio))\nforall x (Supple(x, joletta) -> Supple(x, clio))\nforall x (Syncretize(x, clio) -> Spoon(x, joletta))\n\nSupple(clio, joletta)\n\ntherefore Supple(clio, joletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The lawton dogmatise the marge. The lawton equip the marge. The marge equip the lawton. If someone dogmatise the lawton and they visit the marge then the marge dogmatise the lawton. If someone dogmatise the lawton and they visit the lawton then they are fastidious. If someone equip the marge and they visit the lawton then the marge dogmatise the lawton. If someone is homesick then they see the marge. If someone equip the lawton then they visit the marge. If someone ancylose the marge then they need the lawton. The lawton does not visit the marge.", "logic": "\nDogmatise(lawton, marge)\nEquip(lawton, marge)\nEquip(marge, lawton)\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, lawton) and Equip(x, marge) -> Dogmatise(marge, lawton))\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, lawton) and Equip(x, lawton) -> Fastidious(x))\nforall x (Equip(x, marge) and Equip(x, lawton) -> Dogmatise(marge, lawton))\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Ancylose(x, marge))\nforall x (Equip(x, lawton) -> Equip(x, marge))\nforall x (Ancylose(x, marge) -> Dogmatise(x, lawton))\n\nnot Equip(lawton, marge)\n\ntherefore Equip(lawton, marge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The johny sing the amalea. The johny outshout the amalea. The amalea outshout the johny. If someone sing the johny and they visit the amalea then the amalea sing the johny. If someone sing the johny and they visit the johny then they are obvious. If someone outshout the amalea and they visit the johny then the amalea sing the johny. If someone is airy then they see the amalea. If someone outshout the johny then they visit the amalea. If someone goldbrick the amalea then they need the johny. The amalea outshout the amalea.", "logic": "\nSing(johny, amalea)\nOutshout(johny, amalea)\nOutshout(amalea, johny)\nforall x (Sing(x, johny) and Outshout(x, amalea) -> Sing(amalea, johny))\nforall x (Sing(x, johny) and Outshout(x, johny) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Outshout(x, amalea) and Outshout(x, johny) -> Sing(amalea, johny))\nforall x (Airy(x) -> Goldbrick(x, amalea))\nforall x (Outshout(x, johny) -> Outshout(x, amalea))\nforall x (Goldbrick(x, amalea) -> Sing(x, johny))\n\nOutshout(amalea, amalea)\n\nOutshout(amalea, johny) and forall x (Outshout(x, johny) -> Outshout(x, amalea)) -> therefore Outshout(amalea, amalea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The cyrill distend the doug. The cyrill authorize the doug. The doug authorize the cyrill. If someone distend the cyrill and they visit the doug then the doug distend the cyrill. If someone distend the cyrill and they visit the cyrill then they are topless. If someone authorize the doug and they visit the cyrill then the doug distend the cyrill. If someone is crocked then they see the doug. If someone authorize the cyrill then they visit the doug. If someone sorrow the doug then they need the cyrill. The doug does not visit the doug.", "logic": "\nDistend(cyrill, doug)\nAuthorize(cyrill, doug)\nAuthorize(doug, cyrill)\nforall x (Distend(x, cyrill) and Authorize(x, doug) -> Distend(doug, cyrill))\nforall x (Distend(x, cyrill) and Authorize(x, cyrill) -> Topless(x))\nforall x (Authorize(x, doug) and Authorize(x, cyrill) -> Distend(doug, cyrill))\nforall x (Crocked(x) -> Sorrow(x, doug))\nforall x (Authorize(x, cyrill) -> Authorize(x, doug))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, doug) -> Distend(x, cyrill))\n\nnot Authorize(doug, doug)\n\nAuthorize(doug, cyrill) and forall x (Authorize(x, cyrill) -> Authorize(x, doug)) -> therefore Authorize(doug, doug)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The abbi gibbet the elfrieda. The abbi demoralize the elfrieda. The elfrieda demoralize the abbi. If someone gibbet the abbi and they visit the elfrieda then the elfrieda gibbet the abbi. If someone gibbet the abbi and they visit the abbi then they are besprent. If someone demoralize the elfrieda and they visit the abbi then the elfrieda gibbet the abbi. If someone is parenteral then they see the elfrieda. If someone demoralize the abbi then they visit the elfrieda. If someone winkle the elfrieda then they need the abbi. The elfrieda gibbet the abbi.", "logic": "\nGibbet(abbi, elfrieda)\nDemoralize(abbi, elfrieda)\nDemoralize(elfrieda, abbi)\nforall x (Gibbet(x, abbi) and Demoralize(x, elfrieda) -> Gibbet(elfrieda, abbi))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, abbi) and Demoralize(x, abbi) -> Besprent(x))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, elfrieda) and Demoralize(x, abbi) -> Gibbet(elfrieda, abbi))\nforall x (Parenteral(x) -> Winkle(x, elfrieda))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, abbi) -> Demoralize(x, elfrieda))\nforall x (Winkle(x, elfrieda) -> Gibbet(x, abbi))\n\nGibbet(elfrieda, abbi)\n\nDemoralize(elfrieda, abbi) and forall x (Demoralize(x, abbi) -> Demoralize(x, elfrieda)) -> therefore Demoralize(elfrieda, elfrieda) Demoralize(elfrieda, elfrieda) and Demoralize(elfrieda, abbi) and forall x (Demoralize(x, elfrieda) and Demoralize(x, abbi) -> Gibbet(elfrieda, abbi)) -> therefore Gibbet(elfrieda, abbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The mechelle exemplify the shanon. The mechelle tribulate the shanon. The shanon tribulate the mechelle. If someone exemplify the mechelle and they visit the shanon then the shanon exemplify the mechelle. If someone exemplify the mechelle and they visit the mechelle then they are suitable. If someone tribulate the shanon and they visit the mechelle then the shanon exemplify the mechelle. If someone is pulseless then they see the shanon. If someone tribulate the mechelle then they visit the shanon. If someone proof the shanon then they need the mechelle. The shanon does not need the mechelle.", "logic": "\nExemplify(mechelle, shanon)\nTribulate(mechelle, shanon)\nTribulate(shanon, mechelle)\nforall x (Exemplify(x, mechelle) and Tribulate(x, shanon) -> Exemplify(shanon, mechelle))\nforall x (Exemplify(x, mechelle) and Tribulate(x, mechelle) -> Suitable(x))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, shanon) and Tribulate(x, mechelle) -> Exemplify(shanon, mechelle))\nforall x (Pulseless(x) -> Proof(x, shanon))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, mechelle) -> Tribulate(x, shanon))\nforall x (Proof(x, shanon) -> Exemplify(x, mechelle))\n\nnot Exemplify(shanon, mechelle)\n\nTribulate(shanon, mechelle) and forall x (Tribulate(x, mechelle) -> Tribulate(x, shanon)) -> therefore Tribulate(shanon, shanon) Tribulate(shanon, shanon) and Tribulate(shanon, mechelle) and forall x (Tribulate(x, shanon) and Tribulate(x, mechelle) -> Exemplify(shanon, mechelle)) -> therefore Exemplify(shanon, mechelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The sunny ebonise the elke. The sunny politicize the elke. The elke politicize the sunny. If someone ebonise the sunny and they visit the elke then the elke ebonise the sunny. If someone ebonise the sunny and they visit the sunny then they are toned. If someone politicize the elke and they visit the sunny then the elke ebonise the sunny. If someone is squirting then they see the elke. If someone politicize the sunny then they visit the elke. If someone fundraise the elke then they need the sunny. The elke is toned.", "logic": "\nEbonise(sunny, elke)\nPoliticize(sunny, elke)\nPoliticize(elke, sunny)\nforall x (Ebonise(x, sunny) and Politicize(x, elke) -> Ebonise(elke, sunny))\nforall x (Ebonise(x, sunny) and Politicize(x, sunny) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Politicize(x, elke) and Politicize(x, sunny) -> Ebonise(elke, sunny))\nforall x (Squirting(x) -> Fundraise(x, elke))\nforall x (Politicize(x, sunny) -> Politicize(x, elke))\nforall x (Fundraise(x, elke) -> Ebonise(x, sunny))\n\nToned(elke)\n\nPoliticize(elke, sunny) and forall x (Politicize(x, sunny) -> Politicize(x, elke)) -> therefore Politicize(elke, elke) Politicize(elke, elke) and Politicize(elke, sunny) and forall x (Politicize(x, elke) and Politicize(x, sunny) -> Ebonise(elke, sunny)) -> therefore Ebonise(elke, sunny) Ebonise(elke, sunny) and Politicize(elke, sunny) and forall x (Ebonise(x, sunny) and Politicize(x, sunny) -> Toned(x)) -> therefore Toned(elke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The catlee lifehack the travers. The catlee arrange the travers. The travers arrange the catlee. If someone lifehack the catlee and they visit the travers then the travers lifehack the catlee. If someone lifehack the catlee and they visit the catlee then they are scriptural. If someone arrange the travers and they visit the catlee then the travers lifehack the catlee. If someone is nubby then they see the travers. If someone arrange the catlee then they visit the travers. If someone earth the travers then they need the catlee. The travers is not scriptural.", "logic": "\nLifehack(catlee, travers)\nArrange(catlee, travers)\nArrange(travers, catlee)\nforall x (Lifehack(x, catlee) and Arrange(x, travers) -> Lifehack(travers, catlee))\nforall x (Lifehack(x, catlee) and Arrange(x, catlee) -> Scriptural(x))\nforall x (Arrange(x, travers) and Arrange(x, catlee) -> Lifehack(travers, catlee))\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Earth(x, travers))\nforall x (Arrange(x, catlee) -> Arrange(x, travers))\nforall x (Earth(x, travers) -> Lifehack(x, catlee))\n\nnot Scriptural(travers)\n\nArrange(travers, catlee) and forall x (Arrange(x, catlee) -> Arrange(x, travers)) -> therefore Arrange(travers, travers) Arrange(travers, travers) and Arrange(travers, catlee) and forall x (Arrange(x, travers) and Arrange(x, catlee) -> Lifehack(travers, catlee)) -> therefore Lifehack(travers, catlee) Lifehack(travers, catlee) and Arrange(travers, catlee) and forall x (Lifehack(x, catlee) and Arrange(x, catlee) -> Scriptural(x)) -> therefore Scriptural(travers)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The orson calculate the olenka. The orson yield the olenka. The olenka yield the orson. If someone calculate the orson and they visit the olenka then the olenka calculate the orson. If someone calculate the orson and they visit the orson then they are beforehand. If someone yield the olenka and they visit the orson then the olenka calculate the orson. If someone is purgative then they see the olenka. If someone yield the orson then they visit the olenka. If someone wine the olenka then they need the orson. The orson does not need the orson.", "logic": "\nCalculate(orson, olenka)\nYield(orson, olenka)\nYield(olenka, orson)\nforall x (Calculate(x, orson) and Yield(x, olenka) -> Calculate(olenka, orson))\nforall x (Calculate(x, orson) and Yield(x, orson) -> Beforehand(x))\nforall x (Yield(x, olenka) and Yield(x, orson) -> Calculate(olenka, orson))\nforall x (Purgative(x) -> Wine(x, olenka))\nforall x (Yield(x, orson) -> Yield(x, olenka))\nforall x (Wine(x, olenka) -> Calculate(x, orson))\n\nnot Calculate(orson, orson)\n\nforall x (Wine(x, olenka) -> Calculate(x, orson)) <- forall x (Purgative(x) -> Wine(x, olenka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The minetta twiddle the deina. The minetta satellite the deina. The deina satellite the minetta. If someone twiddle the minetta and they visit the deina then the deina twiddle the minetta. If someone twiddle the minetta and they visit the minetta then they are disheveled. If someone satellite the deina and they visit the minetta then the deina twiddle the minetta. If someone is modernized then they see the deina. If someone satellite the minetta then they visit the deina. If someone vomit the deina then they need the minetta. The deina vomit the deina.", "logic": "\nTwiddle(minetta, deina)\nSatellite(minetta, deina)\nSatellite(deina, minetta)\nforall x (Twiddle(x, minetta) and Satellite(x, deina) -> Twiddle(deina, minetta))\nforall x (Twiddle(x, minetta) and Satellite(x, minetta) -> Disheveled(x))\nforall x (Satellite(x, deina) and Satellite(x, minetta) -> Twiddle(deina, minetta))\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Vomit(x, deina))\nforall x (Satellite(x, minetta) -> Satellite(x, deina))\nforall x (Vomit(x, deina) -> Twiddle(x, minetta))\n\nVomit(deina, deina)\n\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Vomit(x, deina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The issie exile the red. The issie chirr the red. The red chirr the issie. If someone exile the issie and they visit the red then the red exile the issie. If someone exile the issie and they visit the issie then they are unsaddled. If someone chirr the red and they visit the issie then the red exile the issie. If someone is flocculent then they see the red. If someone chirr the issie then they visit the red. If someone fuss the red then they need the issie. The issie is not unsaddled.", "logic": "\nExile(issie, red)\nChirr(issie, red)\nChirr(red, issie)\nforall x (Exile(x, issie) and Chirr(x, red) -> Exile(red, issie))\nforall x (Exile(x, issie) and Chirr(x, issie) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Chirr(x, red) and Chirr(x, issie) -> Exile(red, issie))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Fuss(x, red))\nforall x (Chirr(x, issie) -> Chirr(x, red))\nforall x (Fuss(x, red) -> Exile(x, issie))\n\nnot Unsaddled(issie)\n\nforall x (Exile(x, issie) and Chirr(x, issie) -> Unsaddled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The joletta dogmatise the romain. The joletta pass the romain. The romain pass the joletta. If someone dogmatise the joletta and they visit the romain then the romain dogmatise the joletta. If someone dogmatise the joletta and they visit the joletta then they are socialized. If someone pass the romain and they visit the joletta then the romain dogmatise the joletta. If someone is bugged then they see the romain. If someone pass the joletta then they visit the romain. If someone front the romain then they need the joletta. The joletta front the romain.", "logic": "\nDogmatise(joletta, romain)\nPass(joletta, romain)\nPass(romain, joletta)\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, joletta) and Pass(x, romain) -> Dogmatise(romain, joletta))\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, joletta) and Pass(x, joletta) -> Socialized(x))\nforall x (Pass(x, romain) and Pass(x, joletta) -> Dogmatise(romain, joletta))\nforall x (Bugged(x) -> Front(x, romain))\nforall x (Pass(x, joletta) -> Pass(x, romain))\nforall x (Front(x, romain) -> Dogmatise(x, joletta))\n\nFront(joletta, romain)\n\nforall x (Bugged(x) -> Front(x, romain)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The nevin cowhide the jaynell. The nevin melanise the jaynell. The jaynell melanise the nevin. If someone cowhide the nevin and they visit the jaynell then the jaynell cowhide the nevin. If someone cowhide the nevin and they visit the nevin then they are alarming. If someone melanise the jaynell and they visit the nevin then the jaynell cowhide the nevin. If someone is vaulted then they see the jaynell. If someone melanise the nevin then they visit the jaynell. If someone replace the jaynell then they need the nevin. The jaynell does not need the jaynell.", "logic": "\nCowhide(nevin, jaynell)\nMelanise(nevin, jaynell)\nMelanise(jaynell, nevin)\nforall x (Cowhide(x, nevin) and Melanise(x, jaynell) -> Cowhide(jaynell, nevin))\nforall x (Cowhide(x, nevin) and Melanise(x, nevin) -> Alarming(x))\nforall x (Melanise(x, jaynell) and Melanise(x, nevin) -> Cowhide(jaynell, nevin))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) -> Replace(x, jaynell))\nforall x (Melanise(x, nevin) -> Melanise(x, jaynell))\nforall x (Replace(x, jaynell) -> Cowhide(x, nevin))\n\nnot Cowhide(jaynell, jaynell)\n\nnot Cowhide(jaynell, jaynell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The elmira degauss the samuel. The elmira impregnate the samuel. The samuel impregnate the elmira. If someone degauss the elmira and they visit the samuel then the samuel degauss the elmira. If someone degauss the elmira and they visit the elmira then they are baffling. If someone impregnate the samuel and they visit the elmira then the samuel degauss the elmira. If someone is stylized then they see the samuel. If someone impregnate the elmira then they visit the samuel. If someone vowelise the samuel then they need the elmira. The elmira is kind.", "logic": "\nDegauss(elmira, samuel)\nImpregnate(elmira, samuel)\nImpregnate(samuel, elmira)\nforall x (Degauss(x, elmira) and Impregnate(x, samuel) -> Degauss(samuel, elmira))\nforall x (Degauss(x, elmira) and Impregnate(x, elmira) -> Baffling(x))\nforall x (Impregnate(x, samuel) and Impregnate(x, elmira) -> Degauss(samuel, elmira))\nforall x (Stylized(x) -> Vowelise(x, samuel))\nforall x (Impregnate(x, elmira) -> Impregnate(x, samuel))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, samuel) -> Degauss(x, elmira))\n\nKind(elmira)\n\nKind(elmira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The lorain severalize the rolph. The lorain reach the rolph. The rolph reach the lorain. If someone severalize the lorain and they visit the rolph then the rolph severalize the lorain. If someone severalize the lorain and they visit the lorain then they are phalangeal. If someone reach the rolph and they visit the lorain then the rolph severalize the lorain. If someone is caucasic then they see the rolph. If someone reach the lorain then they visit the rolph. If someone prophesy the rolph then they need the lorain. The rolph does not see the lorain.", "logic": "\nSeveralize(lorain, rolph)\nReach(lorain, rolph)\nReach(rolph, lorain)\nforall x (Severalize(x, lorain) and Reach(x, rolph) -> Severalize(rolph, lorain))\nforall x (Severalize(x, lorain) and Reach(x, lorain) -> Phalangeal(x))\nforall x (Reach(x, rolph) and Reach(x, lorain) -> Severalize(rolph, lorain))\nforall x (Caucasic(x) -> Prophesy(x, rolph))\nforall x (Reach(x, lorain) -> Reach(x, rolph))\nforall x (Prophesy(x, rolph) -> Severalize(x, lorain))\n\nnot Prophesy(rolph, lorain)\n\nnot Prophesy(rolph, lorain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The rab terrace the averyl. The rab enplane the averyl. The averyl enplane the rab. If someone terrace the rab and they visit the averyl then the averyl terrace the rab. If someone terrace the rab and they visit the rab then they are attempted. If someone enplane the averyl and they visit the rab then the averyl terrace the rab. If someone is leaflike then they see the averyl. If someone enplane the rab then they visit the averyl. If someone overdrive the averyl then they need the rab. The rab is green.", "logic": "\nTerrace(rab, averyl)\nEnplane(rab, averyl)\nEnplane(averyl, rab)\nforall x (Terrace(x, rab) and Enplane(x, averyl) -> Terrace(averyl, rab))\nforall x (Terrace(x, rab) and Enplane(x, rab) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Enplane(x, averyl) and Enplane(x, rab) -> Terrace(averyl, rab))\nforall x (Leaflike(x) -> Overdrive(x, averyl))\nforall x (Enplane(x, rab) -> Enplane(x, averyl))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, averyl) -> Terrace(x, rab))\n\nGreen(rab)\n\nGreen(rab) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The bobinette is not ciliated. If someone is ciliated then they are not fleet. If the bobinette is revengeful then the bobinette is ciliated. All wearable people are thinned. If someone is fleet and revengeful then they are not wearable. If someone is ciliated and thinned then they are wearable. If the bobinette is fleet then the bobinette is wearable. If the bobinette is wearable then the bobinette is fleet. If the bobinette is not ciliated then the bobinette is fleet. The bobinette is not ciliated.", "logic": "\nnot Ciliated(bobinette)\nforall x (Ciliated(x) -> not Fleet(x))\nRevengeful(bobinette) -> Ciliated(bobinette)\nforall x (Wearable(x) -> Thinned(x))\nforall x (Fleet(x) and Revengeful(x) -> not Wearable(x))\nforall x (Ciliated(x) and Thinned(x) -> Wearable(x))\nFleet(bobinette) -> Wearable(bobinette)\nWearable(bobinette) -> Fleet(bobinette)\nnot Ciliated(bobinette) -> Fleet(bobinette)\n\nnot Ciliated(bobinette)\n\ntherefore not Ciliated(bobinette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The charlene is not flamboyant. If someone is flamboyant then they are not bushy. If the charlene is abient then the charlene is flamboyant. All absorbable people are culpable. If someone is bushy and abient then they are not absorbable. If someone is flamboyant and culpable then they are absorbable. If the charlene is bushy then the charlene is absorbable. If the charlene is absorbable then the charlene is bushy. If the charlene is not flamboyant then the charlene is bushy. The charlene is flamboyant.", "logic": "\nnot Flamboyant(charlene)\nforall x (Flamboyant(x) -> not Bushy(x))\nAbient(charlene) -> Flamboyant(charlene)\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Culpable(x))\nforall x (Bushy(x) and Abient(x) -> not Absorbable(x))\nforall x (Flamboyant(x) and Culpable(x) -> Absorbable(x))\nBushy(charlene) -> Absorbable(charlene)\nAbsorbable(charlene) -> Bushy(charlene)\nnot Flamboyant(charlene) -> Bushy(charlene)\n\nFlamboyant(charlene)\n\ntherefore not Flamboyant(charlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The betteanne is not unoiled. If someone is unoiled then they are not reckless. If the betteanne is timid then the betteanne is unoiled. All aerobic people are neuronal. If someone is reckless and timid then they are not aerobic. If someone is unoiled and neuronal then they are aerobic. If the betteanne is reckless then the betteanne is aerobic. If the betteanne is aerobic then the betteanne is reckless. If the betteanne is not unoiled then the betteanne is reckless. The betteanne is reckless.", "logic": "\nnot Unoiled(betteanne)\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> not Reckless(x))\nTimid(betteanne) -> Unoiled(betteanne)\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) and Timid(x) -> not Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) and Neuronal(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nReckless(betteanne) -> Aerobic(betteanne)\nAerobic(betteanne) -> Reckless(betteanne)\nnot Unoiled(betteanne) -> Reckless(betteanne)\n\nReckless(betteanne)\n\nnot Unoiled(betteanne) and not Unoiled(betteanne) -> Reckless(betteanne) -> therefore Reckless(betteanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The tiffanie is not sericeous. If someone is sericeous then they are not debonnaire. If the tiffanie is penurious then the tiffanie is sericeous. All chiasmal people are incoming. If someone is debonnaire and penurious then they are not chiasmal. If someone is sericeous and incoming then they are chiasmal. If the tiffanie is debonnaire then the tiffanie is chiasmal. If the tiffanie is chiasmal then the tiffanie is debonnaire. If the tiffanie is not sericeous then the tiffanie is debonnaire. The tiffanie is not debonnaire.", "logic": "\nnot Sericeous(tiffanie)\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> not Debonnaire(x))\nPenurious(tiffanie) -> Sericeous(tiffanie)\nforall x (Chiasmal(x) -> Incoming(x))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and Penurious(x) -> not Chiasmal(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Incoming(x) -> Chiasmal(x))\nDebonnaire(tiffanie) -> Chiasmal(tiffanie)\nChiasmal(tiffanie) -> Debonnaire(tiffanie)\nnot Sericeous(tiffanie) -> Debonnaire(tiffanie)\n\nnot Debonnaire(tiffanie)\n\nnot Sericeous(tiffanie) and not Sericeous(tiffanie) -> Debonnaire(tiffanie) -> therefore Debonnaire(tiffanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The tana is not ornery. If someone is ornery then they are not prescribed. If the tana is cultivated then the tana is ornery. All earthlike people are infuriated. If someone is prescribed and cultivated then they are not earthlike. If someone is ornery and infuriated then they are earthlike. If the tana is prescribed then the tana is earthlike. If the tana is earthlike then the tana is prescribed. If the tana is not ornery then the tana is prescribed. The tana is earthlike.", "logic": "\nnot Ornery(tana)\nforall x (Ornery(x) -> not Prescribed(x))\nCultivated(tana) -> Ornery(tana)\nforall x (Earthlike(x) -> Infuriated(x))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and Cultivated(x) -> not Earthlike(x))\nforall x (Ornery(x) and Infuriated(x) -> Earthlike(x))\nPrescribed(tana) -> Earthlike(tana)\nEarthlike(tana) -> Prescribed(tana)\nnot Ornery(tana) -> Prescribed(tana)\n\nEarthlike(tana)\n\nnot Ornery(tana) and not Ornery(tana) -> Prescribed(tana) -> therefore Prescribed(tana) Prescribed(tana) and Prescribed(tana) -> Earthlike(tana) -> therefore Earthlike(tana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The anatoly is not liveable. If someone is liveable then they are not overbusy. If the anatoly is granular then the anatoly is liveable. All angered people are ovate. If someone is overbusy and granular then they are not angered. If someone is liveable and ovate then they are angered. If the anatoly is overbusy then the anatoly is angered. If the anatoly is angered then the anatoly is overbusy. If the anatoly is not liveable then the anatoly is overbusy. The anatoly is not angered.", "logic": "\nnot Liveable(anatoly)\nforall x (Liveable(x) -> not Overbusy(x))\nGranular(anatoly) -> Liveable(anatoly)\nforall x (Angered(x) -> Ovate(x))\nforall x (Overbusy(x) and Granular(x) -> not Angered(x))\nforall x (Liveable(x) and Ovate(x) -> Angered(x))\nOverbusy(anatoly) -> Angered(anatoly)\nAngered(anatoly) -> Overbusy(anatoly)\nnot Liveable(anatoly) -> Overbusy(anatoly)\n\nnot Angered(anatoly)\n\nnot Liveable(anatoly) and not Liveable(anatoly) -> Overbusy(anatoly) -> therefore Overbusy(anatoly) Overbusy(anatoly) and Overbusy(anatoly) -> Angered(anatoly) -> therefore Angered(anatoly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The romeo is not thundery. If someone is thundery then they are not unfastened. If the romeo is appraising then the romeo is thundery. All unfathomed people are wrecked. If someone is unfastened and appraising then they are not unfathomed. If someone is thundery and wrecked then they are unfathomed. If the romeo is unfastened then the romeo is unfathomed. If the romeo is unfathomed then the romeo is unfastened. If the romeo is not thundery then the romeo is unfastened. The romeo is wrecked.", "logic": "\nnot Thundery(romeo)\nforall x (Thundery(x) -> not Unfastened(x))\nAppraising(romeo) -> Thundery(romeo)\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Unfastened(x) and Appraising(x) -> not Unfathomed(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Wrecked(x) -> Unfathomed(x))\nUnfastened(romeo) -> Unfathomed(romeo)\nUnfathomed(romeo) -> Unfastened(romeo)\nnot Thundery(romeo) -> Unfastened(romeo)\n\nWrecked(romeo)\n\nnot Thundery(romeo) and not Thundery(romeo) -> Unfastened(romeo) -> therefore Unfastened(romeo) Unfastened(romeo) and Unfastened(romeo) -> Unfathomed(romeo) -> therefore Unfathomed(romeo) Unfathomed(romeo) and forall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Wrecked(x)) -> therefore Wrecked(romeo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The biddy is not unrequited. If someone is unrequited then they are not branching. If the biddy is extensile then the biddy is unrequited. All baptised people are telltale. If someone is branching and extensile then they are not baptised. If someone is unrequited and telltale then they are baptised. If the biddy is branching then the biddy is baptised. If the biddy is baptised then the biddy is branching. If the biddy is not unrequited then the biddy is branching. The biddy is not telltale.", "logic": "\nnot Unrequited(biddy)\nforall x (Unrequited(x) -> not Branching(x))\nExtensile(biddy) -> Unrequited(biddy)\nforall x (Baptised(x) -> Telltale(x))\nforall x (Branching(x) and Extensile(x) -> not Baptised(x))\nforall x (Unrequited(x) and Telltale(x) -> Baptised(x))\nBranching(biddy) -> Baptised(biddy)\nBaptised(biddy) -> Branching(biddy)\nnot Unrequited(biddy) -> Branching(biddy)\n\nnot Telltale(biddy)\n\nnot Unrequited(biddy) and not Unrequited(biddy) -> Branching(biddy) -> therefore Branching(biddy) Branching(biddy) and Branching(biddy) -> Baptised(biddy) -> therefore Baptised(biddy) Baptised(biddy) and forall x (Baptised(x) -> Telltale(x)) -> therefore Telltale(biddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The witold is not occurrent. If someone is occurrent then they are not picayune. If the witold is glooming then the witold is occurrent. All hydrated people are depictive. If someone is picayune and glooming then they are not hydrated. If someone is occurrent and depictive then they are hydrated. If the witold is picayune then the witold is hydrated. If the witold is hydrated then the witold is picayune. If the witold is not occurrent then the witold is picayune. The witold does not like the witold.", "logic": "\nnot Occurrent(witold)\nforall x (Occurrent(x) -> not Picayune(x))\nGlooming(witold) -> Occurrent(witold)\nforall x (Hydrated(x) -> Depictive(x))\nforall x (Picayune(x) and Glooming(x) -> not Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) and Depictive(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nPicayune(witold) -> Hydrated(witold)\nHydrated(witold) -> Picayune(witold)\nnot Occurrent(witold) -> Picayune(witold)\n\nnot Likes(witold, witold)\n\nnot Likes(witold, witold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The concordia is not memorable. If someone is memorable then they are not hastate. If the concordia is oecumenic then the concordia is memorable. All elfish people are mercerised. If someone is hastate and oecumenic then they are not elfish. If someone is memorable and mercerised then they are elfish. If the concordia is hastate then the concordia is elfish. If the concordia is elfish then the concordia is hastate. If the concordia is not memorable then the concordia is hastate. The concordia is oecumenic.", "logic": "\nnot Memorable(concordia)\nforall x (Memorable(x) -> not Hastate(x))\nOecumenic(concordia) -> Memorable(concordia)\nforall x (Elfish(x) -> Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Hastate(x) and Oecumenic(x) -> not Elfish(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) and Mercerised(x) -> Elfish(x))\nHastate(concordia) -> Elfish(concordia)\nElfish(concordia) -> Hastate(concordia)\nnot Memorable(concordia) -> Hastate(concordia)\n\nOecumenic(concordia)\n\nOecumenic(concordia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The sheilah is not partitive. If someone is partitive then they are not isotropic. If the sheilah is gouty then the sheilah is partitive. All proper people are crank. If someone is isotropic and gouty then they are not proper. If someone is partitive and crank then they are proper. If the sheilah is isotropic then the sheilah is proper. If the sheilah is proper then the sheilah is isotropic. If the sheilah is not partitive then the sheilah is isotropic. The sheilah does not need the sheilah.", "logic": "\nnot Partitive(sheilah)\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> not Isotropic(x))\nGouty(sheilah) -> Partitive(sheilah)\nforall x (Proper(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Gouty(x) -> not Proper(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) and Crank(x) -> Proper(x))\nIsotropic(sheilah) -> Proper(sheilah)\nProper(sheilah) -> Isotropic(sheilah)\nnot Partitive(sheilah) -> Isotropic(sheilah)\n\nnot Needs(sheilah, sheilah)\n\nnot Needs(sheilah, sheilah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The eolanda is not gristly. If someone is gristly then they are not frisian. If the eolanda is headlong then the eolanda is gristly. All unplanted people are anxious. If someone is frisian and headlong then they are not unplanted. If someone is gristly and anxious then they are unplanted. If the eolanda is frisian then the eolanda is unplanted. If the eolanda is unplanted then the eolanda is frisian. If the eolanda is not gristly then the eolanda is frisian. The eolanda eats the eolanda.", "logic": "\nnot Gristly(eolanda)\nforall x (Gristly(x) -> not Frisian(x))\nHeadlong(eolanda) -> Gristly(eolanda)\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Frisian(x) and Headlong(x) -> not Unplanted(x))\nforall x (Gristly(x) and Anxious(x) -> Unplanted(x))\nFrisian(eolanda) -> Unplanted(eolanda)\nUnplanted(eolanda) -> Frisian(eolanda)\nnot Gristly(eolanda) -> Frisian(eolanda)\n\nEats(eolanda, eolanda)\n\nEats(eolanda, eolanda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "Northrop is sarawakian. Northrop is plumbable. Northrop is not acquainted. Rori is not regnant. Rori is endowed. Rori is starchless. Jerrylee is plumbable. Quiet people are regnant. If Northrop is starchless then Northrop is not regnant. If someone is starchless and not endowed then they are acquainted. Nice, painful people are acquainted. If someone is sarawakian and endowed then they are acquainted. All plumbable people are sarawakian. Big people are plumbable. If someone is endowed and not regnant then they are plumbable. Northrop is not acquainted.", "logic": "\nSarawakian(northrop)\nPlumbable(northrop)\nnot Acquainted(northrop)\nnot Regnant(rori)\nEndowed(rori)\nStarchless(rori)\nPlumbable(jerrylee)\nforall x (Painful(x) -> Regnant(x))\nStarchless(northrop) -> not Regnant(northrop)\nforall x (Starchless(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Starchless(x) and Painful(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and Endowed(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Plumbable(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) -> Plumbable(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) and not Regnant(x) -> Plumbable(x))\n\nnot Acquainted(northrop)\n\ntherefore not Acquainted(northrop)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Scot is carinated. Scot is exceeding. Scot is not mural. Yehudit is not layered. Yehudit is bavarian. Yehudit is massive. Edita is exceeding. Quiet people are layered. If Scot is massive then Scot is not layered. If someone is massive and not bavarian then they are mural. Nice, anomalous people are mural. If someone is carinated and bavarian then they are mural. All exceeding people are carinated. Big people are exceeding. If someone is bavarian and not layered then they are exceeding. Yehudit is not massive.", "logic": "\nCarinated(scot)\nExceeding(scot)\nnot Mural(scot)\nnot Layered(yehudit)\nBavarian(yehudit)\nMassive(yehudit)\nExceeding(edita)\nforall x (Anomalous(x) -> Layered(x))\nMassive(scot) -> not Layered(scot)\nforall x (Massive(x) and not Bavarian(x) -> Mural(x))\nforall x (Massive(x) and Anomalous(x) -> Mural(x))\nforall x (Carinated(x) and Bavarian(x) -> Mural(x))\nforall x (Exceeding(x) -> Carinated(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) -> Exceeding(x))\nforall x (Bavarian(x) and not Layered(x) -> Exceeding(x))\n\nnot Massive(yehudit)\n\ntherefore Massive(yehudit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Thaxter is nonimmune. Thaxter is plugged. Thaxter is not color. Romain is not folksy. Romain is pyknotic. Romain is pixilated. Malva is plugged. Quiet people are folksy. If Thaxter is pixilated then Thaxter is not folksy. If someone is pixilated and not pyknotic then they are color. Nice, chilly people are color. If someone is nonimmune and pyknotic then they are color. All plugged people are nonimmune. Big people are plugged. If someone is pyknotic and not folksy then they are plugged. Romain is plugged.", "logic": "\nNonimmune(thaxter)\nPlugged(thaxter)\nnot Color(thaxter)\nnot Folksy(romain)\nPyknotic(romain)\nPixilated(romain)\nPlugged(malva)\nforall x (Chilly(x) -> Folksy(x))\nPixilated(thaxter) -> not Folksy(thaxter)\nforall x (Pixilated(x) and not Pyknotic(x) -> Color(x))\nforall x (Pixilated(x) and Chilly(x) -> Color(x))\nforall x (Nonimmune(x) and Pyknotic(x) -> Color(x))\nforall x (Plugged(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\nforall x (Folksy(x) -> Plugged(x))\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) and not Folksy(x) -> Plugged(x))\n\nPlugged(romain)\n\nPyknotic(romain) and not Folksy(romain) and forall x (Pyknotic(x) and not Folksy(x) -> Plugged(x)) -> therefore Plugged(romain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Dorice is clenched. Dorice is silky. Dorice is not javanese. Florina is not unimodal. Florina is unmolested. Florina is electric. Salem is silky. Quiet people are unimodal. If Dorice is electric then Dorice is not unimodal. If someone is electric and not unmolested then they are javanese. Nice, undimmed people are javanese. If someone is clenched and unmolested then they are javanese. All silky people are clenched. Big people are silky. If someone is unmolested and not unimodal then they are silky. Florina is not silky.", "logic": "\nClenched(dorice)\nSilky(dorice)\nnot Javanese(dorice)\nnot Unimodal(florina)\nUnmolested(florina)\nElectric(florina)\nSilky(salem)\nforall x (Undimmed(x) -> Unimodal(x))\nElectric(dorice) -> not Unimodal(dorice)\nforall x (Electric(x) and not Unmolested(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Electric(x) and Undimmed(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Clenched(x) and Unmolested(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) -> Clenched(x))\nforall x (Unimodal(x) -> Silky(x))\nforall x (Unmolested(x) and not Unimodal(x) -> Silky(x))\n\nnot Silky(florina)\n\nUnmolested(florina) and not Unimodal(florina) and forall x (Unmolested(x) and not Unimodal(x) -> Silky(x)) -> therefore Silky(florina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Faustina is vagile. Faustina is twinkling. Faustina is not permissive. Cathee is not rueful. Cathee is acquitted. Cathee is masterless. Claribel is twinkling. Quiet people are rueful. If Faustina is masterless then Faustina is not rueful. If someone is masterless and not acquitted then they are permissive. Nice, stretchy people are permissive. If someone is vagile and acquitted then they are permissive. All twinkling people are vagile. Big people are twinkling. If someone is acquitted and not rueful then they are twinkling. Cathee is vagile.", "logic": "\nVagile(faustina)\nTwinkling(faustina)\nnot Permissive(faustina)\nnot Rueful(cathee)\nAcquitted(cathee)\nMasterless(cathee)\nTwinkling(claribel)\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Rueful(x))\nMasterless(faustina) -> not Rueful(faustina)\nforall x (Masterless(x) and not Acquitted(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) and Stretchy(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) and Acquitted(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Twinkling(x) -> Vagile(x))\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Twinkling(x))\nforall x (Acquitted(x) and not Rueful(x) -> Twinkling(x))\n\nVagile(cathee)\n\nAcquitted(cathee) and not Rueful(cathee) and forall x (Acquitted(x) and not Rueful(x) -> Twinkling(x)) -> therefore Twinkling(cathee) Twinkling(cathee) and forall x (Twinkling(x) -> Vagile(x)) -> therefore Vagile(cathee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Adolpho is distorted. Adolpho is diarrhetic. Adolpho is not nasty. Kendall is not fiery. Kendall is straggling. Kendall is christlike. Alli is diarrhetic. Quiet people are fiery. If Adolpho is christlike then Adolpho is not fiery. If someone is christlike and not straggling then they are nasty. Nice, alular people are nasty. If someone is distorted and straggling then they are nasty. All diarrhetic people are distorted. Big people are diarrhetic. If someone is straggling and not fiery then they are diarrhetic. Kendall is not distorted.", "logic": "\nDistorted(adolpho)\nDiarrhetic(adolpho)\nnot Nasty(adolpho)\nnot Fiery(kendall)\nStraggling(kendall)\nChristlike(kendall)\nDiarrhetic(alli)\nforall x (Alular(x) -> Fiery(x))\nChristlike(adolpho) -> not Fiery(adolpho)\nforall x (Christlike(x) and not Straggling(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Christlike(x) and Alular(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Distorted(x) and Straggling(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Fiery(x) -> Diarrhetic(x))\nforall x (Straggling(x) and not Fiery(x) -> Diarrhetic(x))\n\nnot Distorted(kendall)\n\nStraggling(kendall) and not Fiery(kendall) and forall x (Straggling(x) and not Fiery(x) -> Diarrhetic(x)) -> therefore Diarrhetic(kendall) Diarrhetic(kendall) and forall x (Diarrhetic(x) -> Distorted(x)) -> therefore Distorted(kendall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Clio is hyaline. Clio is starting. Clio is not riemannian. Katine is not angled. Katine is adactylous. Katine is tripartite. Jeannie is starting. Quiet people are angled. If Clio is tripartite then Clio is not angled. If someone is tripartite and not adactylous then they are riemannian. Nice, undoable people are riemannian. If someone is hyaline and adactylous then they are riemannian. All starting people are hyaline. Big people are starting. If someone is adactylous and not angled then they are starting. Katine is riemannian.", "logic": "\nHyaline(clio)\nStarting(clio)\nnot Riemannian(clio)\nnot Angled(katine)\nAdactylous(katine)\nTripartite(katine)\nStarting(jeannie)\nforall x (Undoable(x) -> Angled(x))\nTripartite(clio) -> not Angled(clio)\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and not Adactylous(x) -> Riemannian(x))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and Undoable(x) -> Riemannian(x))\nforall x (Hyaline(x) and Adactylous(x) -> Riemannian(x))\nforall x (Starting(x) -> Hyaline(x))\nforall x (Angled(x) -> Starting(x))\nforall x (Adactylous(x) and not Angled(x) -> Starting(x))\n\nRiemannian(katine)\n\nAdactylous(katine) and not Angled(katine) and forall x (Adactylous(x) and not Angled(x) -> Starting(x)) -> therefore Starting(katine) Starting(katine) and forall x (Starting(x) -> Hyaline(x)) -> therefore Hyaline(katine) Hyaline(katine) and Adactylous(katine) and forall x (Hyaline(x) and Adactylous(x) -> Riemannian(x)) -> therefore Riemannian(katine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Hobart is arabian. Hobart is aplitic. Hobart is not direct. Sisile is not dashing. Sisile is compliant. Sisile is important. Jayne is aplitic. Quiet people are dashing. If Hobart is important then Hobart is not dashing. If someone is important and not compliant then they are direct. Nice, excitable people are direct. If someone is arabian and compliant then they are direct. All aplitic people are arabian. Big people are aplitic. If someone is compliant and not dashing then they are aplitic. Sisile is not direct.", "logic": "\nArabian(hobart)\nAplitic(hobart)\nnot Direct(hobart)\nnot Dashing(sisile)\nCompliant(sisile)\nImportant(sisile)\nAplitic(jayne)\nforall x (Excitable(x) -> Dashing(x))\nImportant(hobart) -> not Dashing(hobart)\nforall x (Important(x) and not Compliant(x) -> Direct(x))\nforall x (Important(x) and Excitable(x) -> Direct(x))\nforall x (Arabian(x) and Compliant(x) -> Direct(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) -> Arabian(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Aplitic(x))\nforall x (Compliant(x) and not Dashing(x) -> Aplitic(x))\n\nnot Direct(sisile)\n\nCompliant(sisile) and not Dashing(sisile) and forall x (Compliant(x) and not Dashing(x) -> Aplitic(x)) -> therefore Aplitic(sisile) Aplitic(sisile) and forall x (Aplitic(x) -> Arabian(x)) -> therefore Arabian(sisile) Arabian(sisile) and Compliant(sisile) and forall x (Arabian(x) and Compliant(x) -> Direct(x)) -> therefore Direct(sisile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Kin is antimonial. Kin is topknotted. Kin is not myotic. Byron is not grassroots. Byron is mistakable. Byron is sown. Matias is topknotted. Quiet people are grassroots. If Kin is sown then Kin is not grassroots. If someone is sown and not mistakable then they are myotic. Nice, shopsoiled people are myotic. If someone is antimonial and mistakable then they are myotic. All topknotted people are antimonial. Big people are topknotted. If someone is mistakable and not grassroots then they are topknotted. Kin is not grassroots.", "logic": "\nAntimonial(kin)\nTopknotted(kin)\nnot Myotic(kin)\nnot Grassroots(byron)\nMistakable(byron)\nSown(byron)\nTopknotted(matias)\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Grassroots(x))\nSown(kin) -> not Grassroots(kin)\nforall x (Sown(x) and not Mistakable(x) -> Myotic(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) and Shopsoiled(x) -> Myotic(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) and Mistakable(x) -> Myotic(x))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) -> Topknotted(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) and not Grassroots(x) -> Topknotted(x))\n\nnot Grassroots(kin)\n\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Grassroots(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Lynelle is codified. Lynelle is leprose. Lynelle is not wimpish. Isador is not undyed. Isador is guarded. Isador is exothermic. Marje is leprose. Quiet people are undyed. If Lynelle is exothermic then Lynelle is not undyed. If someone is exothermic and not guarded then they are wimpish. Nice, enigmatic people are wimpish. If someone is codified and guarded then they are wimpish. All leprose people are codified. Big people are leprose. If someone is guarded and not undyed then they are leprose. Marje is undyed.", "logic": "\nCodified(lynelle)\nLeprose(lynelle)\nnot Wimpish(lynelle)\nnot Undyed(isador)\nGuarded(isador)\nExothermic(isador)\nLeprose(marje)\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) -> Undyed(x))\nExothermic(lynelle) -> not Undyed(lynelle)\nforall x (Exothermic(x) and not Guarded(x) -> Wimpish(x))\nforall x (Exothermic(x) and Enigmatic(x) -> Wimpish(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) and Guarded(x) -> Wimpish(x))\nforall x (Leprose(x) -> Codified(x))\nforall x (Undyed(x) -> Leprose(x))\nforall x (Guarded(x) and not Undyed(x) -> Leprose(x))\n\nUndyed(marje)\n\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) -> Undyed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Ellette is limbed. Ellette is tartarean. Ellette is not exploded. Ford is not iniquitous. Ford is vast. Ford is peccable. Augustina is tartarean. Quiet people are iniquitous. If Ellette is peccable then Ellette is not iniquitous. If someone is peccable and not vast then they are exploded. Nice, handelian people are exploded. If someone is limbed and vast then they are exploded. All tartarean people are limbed. Big people are tartarean. If someone is vast and not iniquitous then they are tartarean. Augustina is not exploded.", "logic": "\nLimbed(ellette)\nTartarean(ellette)\nnot Exploded(ellette)\nnot Iniquitous(ford)\nVast(ford)\nPeccable(ford)\nTartarean(augustina)\nforall x (Handelian(x) -> Iniquitous(x))\nPeccable(ellette) -> not Iniquitous(ellette)\nforall x (Peccable(x) and not Vast(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Peccable(x) and Handelian(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) and Vast(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Iniquitous(x) -> Tartarean(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) and not Iniquitous(x) -> Tartarean(x))\n\nnot Exploded(augustina)\n\nforall x (Peccable(x) and not Vast(x) -> Exploded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Natalina is iffy. Natalina is afghani. Natalina is not landscaped. Thibaud is not accessory. Thibaud is duteous. Thibaud is querulous. Eadie is afghani. Quiet people are accessory. If Natalina is querulous then Natalina is not accessory. If someone is querulous and not duteous then they are landscaped. Nice, lithesome people are landscaped. If someone is iffy and duteous then they are landscaped. All afghani people are iffy. Big people are afghani. If someone is duteous and not accessory then they are afghani. Thibaud is lithesome.", "logic": "\nIffy(natalina)\nAfghani(natalina)\nnot Landscaped(natalina)\nnot Accessory(thibaud)\nDuteous(thibaud)\nQuerulous(thibaud)\nAfghani(eadie)\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> Accessory(x))\nQuerulous(natalina) -> not Accessory(natalina)\nforall x (Querulous(x) and not Duteous(x) -> Landscaped(x))\nforall x (Querulous(x) and Lithesome(x) -> Landscaped(x))\nforall x (Iffy(x) and Duteous(x) -> Landscaped(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) -> Iffy(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) -> Afghani(x))\nforall x (Duteous(x) and not Accessory(x) -> Afghani(x))\n\nLithesome(thibaud)\n\nLithesome(thibaud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Antoine is recurved. Antoine is indelible. Antoine is not novel. Robbyn is not ergotic. Robbyn is protestant. Robbyn is isometric. Rhodie is indelible. Quiet people are ergotic. If Antoine is isometric then Antoine is not ergotic. If someone is isometric and not protestant then they are novel. Nice, oversea people are novel. If someone is recurved and protestant then they are novel. All indelible people are recurved. Big people are indelible. If someone is protestant and not ergotic then they are indelible. Antoine is not isometric.", "logic": "\nRecurved(antoine)\nIndelible(antoine)\nnot Novel(antoine)\nnot Ergotic(robbyn)\nProtestant(robbyn)\nIsometric(robbyn)\nIndelible(rhodie)\nforall x (Oversea(x) -> Ergotic(x))\nIsometric(antoine) -> not Ergotic(antoine)\nforall x (Isometric(x) and not Protestant(x) -> Novel(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) and Oversea(x) -> Novel(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Protestant(x) -> Novel(x))\nforall x (Indelible(x) -> Recurved(x))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) -> Indelible(x))\nforall x (Protestant(x) and not Ergotic(x) -> Indelible(x))\n\nnot Isometric(antoine)\n\nnot Isometric(antoine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Jereme is ingrowing. Jereme is tippy. Jereme is not intruding. Nedi is not neapolitan. Nedi is comforted. Nedi is thwarted. Ardra is tippy. Quiet people are neapolitan. If Jereme is thwarted then Jereme is not neapolitan. If someone is thwarted and not comforted then they are intruding. Nice, clipped people are intruding. If someone is ingrowing and comforted then they are intruding. All tippy people are ingrowing. Big people are tippy. If someone is comforted and not neapolitan then they are tippy. Jereme is clipped.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(jereme)\nTippy(jereme)\nnot Intruding(jereme)\nnot Neapolitan(nedi)\nComforted(nedi)\nThwarted(nedi)\nTippy(ardra)\nforall x (Clipped(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\nThwarted(jereme) -> not Neapolitan(jereme)\nforall x (Thwarted(x) and not Comforted(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) and Clipped(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) and Comforted(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Tippy(x) -> Ingrowing(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Tippy(x))\nforall x (Comforted(x) and not Neapolitan(x) -> Tippy(x))\n\nClipped(jereme)\n\nClipped(jereme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Bart is opportune. Bart is skeletal. Bart is not vestmental. Calley is not fabricated. Calley is genial. Calley is gastric. Jeannette is skeletal. Quiet people are fabricated. If Bart is gastric then Bart is not fabricated. If someone is gastric and not genial then they are vestmental. Nice, hairlike people are vestmental. If someone is opportune and genial then they are vestmental. All skeletal people are opportune. Big people are skeletal. If someone is genial and not fabricated then they are skeletal. Jeannette is not gastric.", "logic": "\nOpportune(bart)\nSkeletal(bart)\nnot Vestmental(bart)\nnot Fabricated(calley)\nGenial(calley)\nGastric(calley)\nSkeletal(jeannette)\nforall x (Hairlike(x) -> Fabricated(x))\nGastric(bart) -> not Fabricated(bart)\nforall x (Gastric(x) and not Genial(x) -> Vestmental(x))\nforall x (Gastric(x) and Hairlike(x) -> Vestmental(x))\nforall x (Opportune(x) and Genial(x) -> Vestmental(x))\nforall x (Skeletal(x) -> Opportune(x))\nforall x (Fabricated(x) -> Skeletal(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) and not Fabricated(x) -> Skeletal(x))\n\nnot Gastric(jeannette)\n\nnot Gastric(jeannette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Diann is measurable. Diann is grieving. Diann is not backhanded. Gerladina is not bordered. Gerladina is simple. Gerladina is xliv. Bharat is grieving. Quiet people are bordered. If Diann is xliv then Diann is not bordered. If someone is xliv and not simple then they are backhanded. Nice, jingling people are backhanded. If someone is measurable and simple then they are backhanded. All grieving people are measurable. Big people are grieving. If someone is simple and not bordered then they are grieving. Bharat is simple.", "logic": "\nMeasurable(diann)\nGrieving(diann)\nnot Backhanded(diann)\nnot Bordered(gerladina)\nSimple(gerladina)\nXliv(gerladina)\nGrieving(bharat)\nforall x (Jingling(x) -> Bordered(x))\nXliv(diann) -> not Bordered(diann)\nforall x (Xliv(x) and not Simple(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Xliv(x) and Jingling(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Measurable(x) and Simple(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Grieving(x) -> Measurable(x))\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Grieving(x))\nforall x (Simple(x) and not Bordered(x) -> Grieving(x))\n\nSimple(bharat)\n\nSimple(bharat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Nissy is starting. Nissy is adjustable. Nissy is cyprian. Blue people are antebellum. All venerable, starting people are adjustable. All venerable, swimming people are barehanded. Kind people are starting. If Nissy is antebellum and Nissy is cyprian then Nissy is venerable. Young people are swimming. Nissy is starting.", "logic": "\nStarting(nissy)\nAdjustable(nissy)\nCyprian(nissy)\nforall x (Starting(x) -> Antebellum(x))\nforall x (Venerable(x) and Starting(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Venerable(x) and Swimming(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> Starting(x))\nAntebellum(nissy) and Cyprian(nissy) -> Venerable(nissy)\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Swimming(x))\n\nStarting(nissy)\n\ntherefore Starting(nissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Yigal is crenulate. Yigal is limbed. Yigal is immodest. Blue people are hairy. All stricken, crenulate people are limbed. All stricken, scentless people are precast. Kind people are crenulate. If Yigal is hairy and Yigal is immodest then Yigal is stricken. Young people are scentless. Yigal is not crenulate.", "logic": "\nCrenulate(yigal)\nLimbed(yigal)\nImmodest(yigal)\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Hairy(x))\nforall x (Stricken(x) and Crenulate(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Stricken(x) and Scentless(x) -> Precast(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) -> Crenulate(x))\nHairy(yigal) and Immodest(yigal) -> Stricken(yigal)\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Scentless(x))\n\nnot Crenulate(yigal)\n\ntherefore Crenulate(yigal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Shirlene is unblinking. Shirlene is plumlike. Shirlene is statant. Blue people are comburant. All dicky, unblinking people are plumlike. All dicky, unlearned people are degage. Kind people are unblinking. If Shirlene is comburant and Shirlene is statant then Shirlene is dicky. Young people are unlearned. Shirlene is unlearned.", "logic": "\nUnblinking(shirlene)\nPlumlike(shirlene)\nStatant(shirlene)\nforall x (Unblinking(x) -> Comburant(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) and Unblinking(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) and Unlearned(x) -> Degage(x))\nforall x (Plumlike(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nComburant(shirlene) and Statant(shirlene) -> Dicky(shirlene)\nforall x (Statant(x) -> Unlearned(x))\n\nUnlearned(shirlene)\n\nStatant(shirlene) and forall x (Statant(x) -> Unlearned(x)) -> therefore Unlearned(shirlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Gui is adoptable. Gui is groggy. Gui is adoptive. Blue people are yeasty. All untagged, adoptable people are groggy. All untagged, useless people are hysteric. Kind people are adoptable. If Gui is yeasty and Gui is adoptive then Gui is untagged. Young people are useless. Gui is not useless.", "logic": "\nAdoptable(gui)\nGroggy(gui)\nAdoptive(gui)\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Untagged(x) and Adoptable(x) -> Groggy(x))\nforall x (Untagged(x) and Useless(x) -> Hysteric(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nYeasty(gui) and Adoptive(gui) -> Untagged(gui)\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Useless(x))\n\nnot Useless(gui)\n\nAdoptive(gui) and forall x (Adoptive(x) -> Useless(x)) -> therefore Useless(gui)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Grace is associate. Grace is makeshift. Grace is shuddery. Blue people are roofed. All conceptual, associate people are makeshift. All conceptual, abstracted people are unbarred. Kind people are associate. If Grace is roofed and Grace is shuddery then Grace is conceptual. Young people are abstracted. Grace is conceptual.", "logic": "\nAssociate(grace)\nMakeshift(grace)\nShuddery(grace)\nforall x (Associate(x) -> Roofed(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Associate(x) -> Makeshift(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Abstracted(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Makeshift(x) -> Associate(x))\nRoofed(grace) and Shuddery(grace) -> Conceptual(grace)\nforall x (Shuddery(x) -> Abstracted(x))\n\nConceptual(grace)\n\nAssociate(grace) and forall x (Associate(x) -> Roofed(x)) -> therefore Roofed(grace) Roofed(grace) and Shuddery(grace) and Roofed(grace) and Shuddery(grace) -> Conceptual(grace) -> therefore Conceptual(grace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Joella is autonomic. Joella is clastic. Joella is parietal. Blue people are rupestral. All humified, autonomic people are clastic. All humified, engraved people are modernised. Kind people are autonomic. If Joella is rupestral and Joella is parietal then Joella is humified. Young people are engraved. Joella is not humified.", "logic": "\nAutonomic(joella)\nClastic(joella)\nParietal(joella)\nforall x (Autonomic(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Humified(x) and Autonomic(x) -> Clastic(x))\nforall x (Humified(x) and Engraved(x) -> Modernised(x))\nforall x (Clastic(x) -> Autonomic(x))\nRupestral(joella) and Parietal(joella) -> Humified(joella)\nforall x (Parietal(x) -> Engraved(x))\n\nnot Humified(joella)\n\nAutonomic(joella) and forall x (Autonomic(x) -> Rupestral(x)) -> therefore Rupestral(joella) Rupestral(joella) and Parietal(joella) and Rupestral(joella) and Parietal(joella) -> Humified(joella) -> therefore Humified(joella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Marchelle is laciniate. Marchelle is insomniac. Marchelle is ulcerative. Blue people are ingenious. All nescient, laciniate people are insomniac. All nescient, sedentary people are aweless. Kind people are laciniate. If Marchelle is ingenious and Marchelle is ulcerative then Marchelle is nescient. Young people are sedentary. Marchelle is aweless.", "logic": "\nLaciniate(marchelle)\nInsomniac(marchelle)\nUlcerative(marchelle)\nforall x (Laciniate(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) and Laciniate(x) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) and Sedentary(x) -> Aweless(x))\nforall x (Insomniac(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nIngenious(marchelle) and Ulcerative(marchelle) -> Nescient(marchelle)\nforall x (Ulcerative(x) -> Sedentary(x))\n\nAweless(marchelle)\n\nLaciniate(marchelle) and forall x (Laciniate(x) -> Ingenious(x)) -> therefore Ingenious(marchelle) Ingenious(marchelle) and Ulcerative(marchelle) and Ingenious(marchelle) and Ulcerative(marchelle) -> Nescient(marchelle) -> therefore Nescient(marchelle) Ulcerative(marchelle) and forall x (Ulcerative(x) -> Sedentary(x)) -> therefore Sedentary(marchelle) Nescient(marchelle) and Sedentary(marchelle) and forall x (Nescient(x) and Sedentary(x) -> Aweless(x)) -> therefore Aweless(marchelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Dolli is pedal. Dolli is voluminous. Dolli is handled. Blue people are elfish. All subsidized, pedal people are voluminous. All subsidized, troublous people are tragic. Kind people are pedal. If Dolli is elfish and Dolli is handled then Dolli is subsidized. Young people are troublous. Dolli is not tragic.", "logic": "\nPedal(dolli)\nVoluminous(dolli)\nHandled(dolli)\nforall x (Pedal(x) -> Elfish(x))\nforall x (Subsidized(x) and Pedal(x) -> Voluminous(x))\nforall x (Subsidized(x) and Troublous(x) -> Tragic(x))\nforall x (Voluminous(x) -> Pedal(x))\nElfish(dolli) and Handled(dolli) -> Subsidized(dolli)\nforall x (Handled(x) -> Troublous(x))\n\nnot Tragic(dolli)\n\nPedal(dolli) and forall x (Pedal(x) -> Elfish(x)) -> therefore Elfish(dolli) Elfish(dolli) and Handled(dolli) and Elfish(dolli) and Handled(dolli) -> Subsidized(dolli) -> therefore Subsidized(dolli) Handled(dolli) and forall x (Handled(x) -> Troublous(x)) -> therefore Troublous(dolli) Subsidized(dolli) and Troublous(dolli) and forall x (Subsidized(x) and Troublous(x) -> Tragic(x)) -> therefore Tragic(dolli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Bambi is lxviii. Bambi is isomorphic. Bambi is tumescent. Walker is isomorphic. Willetta is lxviii. Willetta is isomorphic. Willetta is addictive. If Bambi is not addictive then Bambi is tumescent. All isomorphic people are odorless. If Walker is bullheaded and Walker is odorless then Walker is continuant. All continuant people are lxviii. Big people are continuant. If someone is odorless and not tumescent then they are continuant. Willetta is lxviii.", "logic": "\nLxviii(bambi)\nIsomorphic(bambi)\nTumescent(bambi)\nIsomorphic(walker)\nLxviii(willetta)\nIsomorphic(willetta)\nAddictive(willetta)\nnot Addictive(bambi) -> Tumescent(bambi)\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Odorless(x))\nBullheaded(walker) and Odorless(walker) -> Continuant(walker)\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Lxviii(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) and not Tumescent(x) -> Continuant(x))\n\nLxviii(willetta)\n\ntherefore Lxviii(willetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Irvine is breasted. Irvine is voltaic. Irvine is cetaceous. Bette is voltaic. Dallas is breasted. Dallas is voltaic. Dallas is undyed. If Irvine is not undyed then Irvine is cetaceous. All voltaic people are bicyclic. If Bette is asymmetric and Bette is bicyclic then Bette is hinder. All hinder people are breasted. Big people are hinder. If someone is bicyclic and not cetaceous then they are hinder. Dallas is not breasted.", "logic": "\nBreasted(irvine)\nVoltaic(irvine)\nCetaceous(irvine)\nVoltaic(bette)\nBreasted(dallas)\nVoltaic(dallas)\nUndyed(dallas)\nnot Undyed(irvine) -> Cetaceous(irvine)\nforall x (Voltaic(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nAsymmetric(bette) and Bicyclic(bette) -> Hinder(bette)\nforall x (Hinder(x) -> Breasted(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) -> Hinder(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and not Cetaceous(x) -> Hinder(x))\n\nnot Breasted(dallas)\n\ntherefore Breasted(dallas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Hannibal is backless. Hannibal is ingenious. Hannibal is leibnizian. Elric is ingenious. Corey is backless. Corey is ingenious. Corey is loved. If Hannibal is not loved then Hannibal is leibnizian. All ingenious people are unwell. If Elric is cruciform and Elric is unwell then Elric is chalky. All chalky people are backless. Big people are chalky. If someone is unwell and not leibnizian then they are chalky. Corey is unwell.", "logic": "\nBackless(hannibal)\nIngenious(hannibal)\nLeibnizian(hannibal)\nIngenious(elric)\nBackless(corey)\nIngenious(corey)\nLoved(corey)\nnot Loved(hannibal) -> Leibnizian(hannibal)\nforall x (Ingenious(x) -> Unwell(x))\nCruciform(elric) and Unwell(elric) -> Chalky(elric)\nforall x (Chalky(x) -> Backless(x))\nforall x (Unwell(x) -> Chalky(x))\nforall x (Unwell(x) and not Leibnizian(x) -> Chalky(x))\n\nUnwell(corey)\n\nIngenious(corey) and forall x (Ingenious(x) -> Unwell(x)) -> therefore Unwell(corey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Burta is welcome. Burta is figurative. Burta is unspoken. Ema is figurative. Leontine is welcome. Leontine is figurative. Leontine is icelandic. If Burta is not icelandic then Burta is unspoken. All figurative people are brisant. If Ema is organised and Ema is brisant then Ema is variform. All variform people are welcome. Big people are variform. If someone is brisant and not unspoken then they are variform. Leontine is not brisant.", "logic": "\nWelcome(burta)\nFigurative(burta)\nUnspoken(burta)\nFigurative(ema)\nWelcome(leontine)\nFigurative(leontine)\nIcelandic(leontine)\nnot Icelandic(burta) -> Unspoken(burta)\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Brisant(x))\nOrganised(ema) and Brisant(ema) -> Variform(ema)\nforall x (Variform(x) -> Welcome(x))\nforall x (Brisant(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Brisant(x) and not Unspoken(x) -> Variform(x))\n\nnot Brisant(leontine)\n\nFigurative(leontine) and forall x (Figurative(x) -> Brisant(x)) -> therefore Brisant(leontine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Florrie is intent. Florrie is xlviii. Florrie is thickening. Chantalle is xlviii. Trace is intent. Trace is xlviii. Trace is childly. If Florrie is not childly then Florrie is thickening. All xlviii people are boggy. If Chantalle is bourgeois and Chantalle is boggy then Chantalle is posted. All posted people are intent. Big people are posted. If someone is boggy and not thickening then they are posted. Florrie is posted.", "logic": "\nIntent(florrie)\nXlviii(florrie)\nThickening(florrie)\nXlviii(chantalle)\nIntent(trace)\nXlviii(trace)\nChildly(trace)\nnot Childly(florrie) -> Thickening(florrie)\nforall x (Xlviii(x) -> Boggy(x))\nBourgeois(chantalle) and Boggy(chantalle) -> Posted(chantalle)\nforall x (Posted(x) -> Intent(x))\nforall x (Boggy(x) -> Posted(x))\nforall x (Boggy(x) and not Thickening(x) -> Posted(x))\n\nPosted(florrie)\n\nXlviii(florrie) and forall x (Xlviii(x) -> Boggy(x)) -> therefore Boggy(florrie) Boggy(florrie) and forall x (Boggy(x) -> Posted(x)) -> therefore Posted(florrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Abdul is coppery. Abdul is inveterate. Abdul is flagitious. Emma is inveterate. Estrella is coppery. Estrella is inveterate. Estrella is calibrated. If Abdul is not calibrated then Abdul is flagitious. All inveterate people are aneurismal. If Emma is zoftig and Emma is aneurismal then Emma is venomed. All venomed people are coppery. Big people are venomed. If someone is aneurismal and not flagitious then they are venomed. Estrella is not venomed.", "logic": "\nCoppery(abdul)\nInveterate(abdul)\nFlagitious(abdul)\nInveterate(emma)\nCoppery(estrella)\nInveterate(estrella)\nCalibrated(estrella)\nnot Calibrated(abdul) -> Flagitious(abdul)\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\nZoftig(emma) and Aneurismal(emma) -> Venomed(emma)\nforall x (Venomed(x) -> Coppery(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Venomed(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) and not Flagitious(x) -> Venomed(x))\n\nnot Venomed(estrella)\n\nInveterate(estrella) and forall x (Inveterate(x) -> Aneurismal(x)) -> therefore Aneurismal(estrella) Aneurismal(estrella) and forall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Venomed(x)) -> therefore Venomed(estrella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Kordula is marbleized. Kordula is billiard. Kordula is autotelic. Parry is billiard. Ezra is marbleized. Ezra is billiard. Ezra is unblushing. If Kordula is not unblushing then Kordula is autotelic. All billiard people are untimbered. If Parry is radio and Parry is untimbered then Parry is vitriolic. All vitriolic people are marbleized. Big people are vitriolic. If someone is untimbered and not autotelic then they are vitriolic. Parry is marbleized.", "logic": "\nMarbleized(kordula)\nBilliard(kordula)\nAutotelic(kordula)\nBilliard(parry)\nMarbleized(ezra)\nBilliard(ezra)\nUnblushing(ezra)\nnot Unblushing(kordula) -> Autotelic(kordula)\nforall x (Billiard(x) -> Untimbered(x))\nRadio(parry) and Untimbered(parry) -> Vitriolic(parry)\nforall x (Vitriolic(x) -> Marbleized(x))\nforall x (Untimbered(x) -> Vitriolic(x))\nforall x (Untimbered(x) and not Autotelic(x) -> Vitriolic(x))\n\nMarbleized(parry)\n\nBilliard(parry) and forall x (Billiard(x) -> Untimbered(x)) -> therefore Untimbered(parry) Untimbered(parry) and forall x (Untimbered(x) -> Vitriolic(x)) -> therefore Vitriolic(parry) Vitriolic(parry) and forall x (Vitriolic(x) -> Marbleized(x)) -> therefore Marbleized(parry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Ellis is anapaestic. Ellis is xxix. Ellis is freeborn. Amory is xxix. Geo is anapaestic. Geo is xxix. Geo is wholesome. If Ellis is not wholesome then Ellis is freeborn. All xxix people are backhand. If Amory is clunky and Amory is backhand then Amory is serous. All serous people are anapaestic. Big people are serous. If someone is backhand and not freeborn then they are serous. Amory is not anapaestic.", "logic": "\nAnapaestic(ellis)\nXxix(ellis)\nFreeborn(ellis)\nXxix(amory)\nAnapaestic(geo)\nXxix(geo)\nWholesome(geo)\nnot Wholesome(ellis) -> Freeborn(ellis)\nforall x (Xxix(x) -> Backhand(x))\nClunky(amory) and Backhand(amory) -> Serous(amory)\nforall x (Serous(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Backhand(x) -> Serous(x))\nforall x (Backhand(x) and not Freeborn(x) -> Serous(x))\n\nnot Anapaestic(amory)\n\nXxix(amory) and forall x (Xxix(x) -> Backhand(x)) -> therefore Backhand(amory) Backhand(amory) and forall x (Backhand(x) -> Serous(x)) -> therefore Serous(amory) Serous(amory) and forall x (Serous(x) -> Anapaestic(x)) -> therefore Anapaestic(amory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Gonzales is stinky. Gonzales is accidental. Gonzales is buteonine. Bayard is accidental. Jasmina is stinky. Jasmina is accidental. Jasmina is codified. If Gonzales is not codified then Gonzales is buteonine. All accidental people are unpassable. If Bayard is sorrel and Bayard is unpassable then Bayard is perfervid. All perfervid people are stinky. Big people are perfervid. If someone is unpassable and not buteonine then they are perfervid. Jasmina is not buteonine.", "logic": "\nStinky(gonzales)\nAccidental(gonzales)\nButeonine(gonzales)\nAccidental(bayard)\nStinky(jasmina)\nAccidental(jasmina)\nCodified(jasmina)\nnot Codified(gonzales) -> Buteonine(gonzales)\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nSorrel(bayard) and Unpassable(bayard) -> Perfervid(bayard)\nforall x (Perfervid(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> Perfervid(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) and not Buteonine(x) -> Perfervid(x))\n\nnot Buteonine(jasmina)\n\nnot Buteonine(jasmina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Harvard is powerful. Harvard is stainable. Harvard is untrained. Belicia is stainable. Zarah is powerful. Zarah is stainable. Zarah is select. If Harvard is not select then Harvard is untrained. All stainable people are gardant. If Belicia is confutable and Belicia is gardant then Belicia is protestant. All protestant people are powerful. Big people are protestant. If someone is gardant and not untrained then they are protestant. Harvard is select.", "logic": "\nPowerful(harvard)\nStainable(harvard)\nUntrained(harvard)\nStainable(belicia)\nPowerful(zarah)\nStainable(zarah)\nSelect(zarah)\nnot Select(harvard) -> Untrained(harvard)\nforall x (Stainable(x) -> Gardant(x))\nConfutable(belicia) and Gardant(belicia) -> Protestant(belicia)\nforall x (Protestant(x) -> Powerful(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> Protestant(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) and not Untrained(x) -> Protestant(x))\n\nSelect(harvard)\n\nSelect(harvard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Doralin is amerindic. Doralin is dense. Doralin is curvey. Lynnett is dense. Kate is amerindic. Kate is dense. Kate is elegant. If Doralin is not elegant then Doralin is curvey. All dense people are resolved. If Lynnett is dismantled and Lynnett is resolved then Lynnett is aetiologic. All aetiologic people are amerindic. Big people are aetiologic. If someone is resolved and not curvey then they are aetiologic. Kate is not dismantled.", "logic": "\nAmerindic(doralin)\nDense(doralin)\nCurvey(doralin)\nDense(lynnett)\nAmerindic(kate)\nDense(kate)\nElegant(kate)\nnot Elegant(doralin) -> Curvey(doralin)\nforall x (Dense(x) -> Resolved(x))\nDismantled(lynnett) and Resolved(lynnett) -> Aetiologic(lynnett)\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Amerindic(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) and not Curvey(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\n\nnot Dismantled(kate)\n\nnot Dismantled(kate) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Adey is sugary. Adey is centrist. Adey is braggy. Daile is centrist. Willie is sugary. Willie is centrist. Willie is estonian. If Adey is not estonian then Adey is braggy. All centrist people are unexciting. If Daile is reusable and Daile is unexciting then Daile is cxxxv. All cxxxv people are sugary. Big people are cxxxv. If someone is unexciting and not braggy then they are cxxxv. Daile is reusable.", "logic": "\nSugary(adey)\nCentrist(adey)\nBraggy(adey)\nCentrist(daile)\nSugary(willie)\nCentrist(willie)\nEstonian(willie)\nnot Estonian(adey) -> Braggy(adey)\nforall x (Centrist(x) -> Unexciting(x))\nReusable(daile) and Unexciting(daile) -> Cxxxv(daile)\nforall x (Cxxxv(x) -> Sugary(x))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) -> Cxxxv(x))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and not Braggy(x) -> Cxxxv(x))\n\nReusable(daile)\n\nReusable(daile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Berry is iodized. Berry is crowing. Berry is sniffly. Thor is crowing. Davina is iodized. Davina is crowing. Davina is mystified. If Berry is not mystified then Berry is sniffly. All crowing people are slivery. If Thor is satiric and Thor is slivery then Thor is homosexual. All homosexual people are iodized. Big people are homosexual. If someone is slivery and not sniffly then they are homosexual. Berry is not satiric.", "logic": "\nIodized(berry)\nCrowing(berry)\nSniffly(berry)\nCrowing(thor)\nIodized(davina)\nCrowing(davina)\nMystified(davina)\nnot Mystified(berry) -> Sniffly(berry)\nforall x (Crowing(x) -> Slivery(x))\nSatiric(thor) and Slivery(thor) -> Homosexual(thor)\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Iodized(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) and not Sniffly(x) -> Homosexual(x))\n\nnot Satiric(berry)\n\nnot Satiric(berry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Zacherie is recessed. Zacherie is accretive. Zacherie is homoecious. Margalit is accretive. Sybille is recessed. Sybille is accretive. Sybille is terrible. If Zacherie is not terrible then Zacherie is homoecious. All accretive people are impatient. If Margalit is ruritanian and Margalit is impatient then Margalit is nerveless. All nerveless people are recessed. Big people are nerveless. If someone is impatient and not homoecious then they are nerveless. Margalit is terrible.", "logic": "\nRecessed(zacherie)\nAccretive(zacherie)\nHomoecious(zacherie)\nAccretive(margalit)\nRecessed(sybille)\nAccretive(sybille)\nTerrible(sybille)\nnot Terrible(zacherie) -> Homoecious(zacherie)\nforall x (Accretive(x) -> Impatient(x))\nRuritanian(margalit) and Impatient(margalit) -> Nerveless(margalit)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Recessed(x))\nforall x (Impatient(x) -> Nerveless(x))\nforall x (Impatient(x) and not Homoecious(x) -> Nerveless(x))\n\nTerrible(margalit)\n\nTerrible(margalit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "The berget is spacy. The berget calumniate the laurel. The laurel calumniate the berget. If the berget is spacy then the berget redesign the laurel. If something novelize the laurel then it calumniate the berget. If something novelize the laurel then it calumniate the laurel. If the laurel calumniate the berget and the berget is octagonal then the berget redesign the laurel. If something calumniate the laurel and it calumniate the berget then the berget is engorged. If something calumniate the berget then the berget novelize the laurel. The laurel calumniate the berget.", "logic": "\nSpacy(berget)\nCalumniate(berget, laurel)\nCalumniate(laurel, berget)\nSpacy(berget) -> Redesign(berget, laurel)\nforall x (Novelize(x, laurel) -> Calumniate(x, berget))\nforall x (Novelize(x, laurel) -> Calumniate(x, laurel))\nCalumniate(laurel, berget) and Octagonal(berget) -> Redesign(berget, laurel)\nforall x (Calumniate(x, laurel) and Calumniate(x, berget) -> Engorged(berget))\nforall x (Calumniate(x, berget) -> Novelize(berget, laurel))\n\nCalumniate(laurel, berget)\n\ntherefore Calumniate(laurel, berget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The maddy is yeasty. The maddy extol the julian. The julian extol the maddy. If the maddy is yeasty then the maddy aggroup the julian. If something outsmart the julian then it extol the maddy. If something outsmart the julian then it extol the julian. If the julian extol the maddy and the maddy is cringing then the maddy aggroup the julian. If something extol the julian and it extol the maddy then the maddy is raddled. If something extol the maddy then the maddy outsmart the julian. The julian does not visit the maddy.", "logic": "\nYeasty(maddy)\nExtol(maddy, julian)\nExtol(julian, maddy)\nYeasty(maddy) -> Aggroup(maddy, julian)\nforall x (Outsmart(x, julian) -> Extol(x, maddy))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, julian) -> Extol(x, julian))\nExtol(julian, maddy) and Cringing(maddy) -> Aggroup(maddy, julian)\nforall x (Extol(x, julian) and Extol(x, maddy) -> Raddled(maddy))\nforall x (Extol(x, maddy) -> Outsmart(maddy, julian))\n\nnot Extol(julian, maddy)\n\ntherefore Extol(julian, maddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The rochella is astir. The rochella slug the greggory. The greggory slug the rochella. If the rochella is astir then the rochella chant the greggory. If something heel the greggory then it slug the rochella. If something heel the greggory then it slug the greggory. If the greggory slug the rochella and the rochella is canty then the rochella chant the greggory. If something slug the greggory and it slug the rochella then the rochella is dirty. If something slug the rochella then the rochella heel the greggory. The rochella chant the greggory.", "logic": "\nAstir(rochella)\nSlug(rochella, greggory)\nSlug(greggory, rochella)\nAstir(rochella) -> Chant(rochella, greggory)\nforall x (Heel(x, greggory) -> Slug(x, rochella))\nforall x (Heel(x, greggory) -> Slug(x, greggory))\nSlug(greggory, rochella) and Canty(rochella) -> Chant(rochella, greggory)\nforall x (Slug(x, greggory) and Slug(x, rochella) -> Dirty(rochella))\nforall x (Slug(x, rochella) -> Heel(rochella, greggory))\n\nChant(rochella, greggory)\n\nAstir(rochella) and Astir(rochella) -> Chant(rochella, greggory) -> therefore Chant(rochella, greggory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The garvy is colorfast. The garvy ward the jamey. The jamey ward the garvy. If the garvy is colorfast then the garvy smooch the jamey. If something spangle the jamey then it ward the garvy. If something spangle the jamey then it ward the jamey. If the jamey ward the garvy and the garvy is analog then the garvy smooch the jamey. If something ward the jamey and it ward the garvy then the garvy is mazed. If something ward the garvy then the garvy spangle the jamey. The garvy does not eat the jamey.", "logic": "\nColorfast(garvy)\nWard(garvy, jamey)\nWard(jamey, garvy)\nColorfast(garvy) -> Smooch(garvy, jamey)\nforall x (Spangle(x, jamey) -> Ward(x, garvy))\nforall x (Spangle(x, jamey) -> Ward(x, jamey))\nWard(jamey, garvy) and Analog(garvy) -> Smooch(garvy, jamey)\nforall x (Ward(x, jamey) and Ward(x, garvy) -> Mazed(garvy))\nforall x (Ward(x, garvy) -> Spangle(garvy, jamey))\n\nnot Smooch(garvy, jamey)\n\nColorfast(garvy) and Colorfast(garvy) -> Smooch(garvy, jamey) -> therefore Smooch(garvy, jamey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The tam is binucleate. The tam loose the nicola. The nicola loose the tam. If the tam is binucleate then the tam candle the nicola. If something blurt the nicola then it loose the tam. If something blurt the nicola then it loose the nicola. If the nicola loose the tam and the tam is snobby then the tam candle the nicola. If something loose the nicola and it loose the tam then the tam is avid. If something loose the tam then the tam blurt the nicola. The tam loose the tam.", "logic": "\nBinucleate(tam)\nLoose(tam, nicola)\nLoose(nicola, tam)\nBinucleate(tam) -> Candle(tam, nicola)\nforall x (Blurt(x, nicola) -> Loose(x, tam))\nforall x (Blurt(x, nicola) -> Loose(x, nicola))\nLoose(nicola, tam) and Snobby(tam) -> Candle(tam, nicola)\nforall x (Loose(x, nicola) and Loose(x, tam) -> Avid(tam))\nforall x (Loose(x, tam) -> Blurt(tam, nicola))\n\nLoose(tam, tam)\n\nLoose(nicola, tam) and forall x (Loose(x, tam) -> Blurt(tam, nicola)) -> therefore Blurt(tam, nicola) Blurt(tam, nicola) and forall x (Blurt(x, nicola) -> Loose(x, tam)) -> therefore Loose(tam, tam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The herminia is errhine. The herminia tessellate the nora. The nora tessellate the herminia. If the herminia is errhine then the herminia mute the nora. If something seep the nora then it tessellate the herminia. If something seep the nora then it tessellate the nora. If the nora tessellate the herminia and the herminia is neither then the herminia mute the nora. If something tessellate the nora and it tessellate the herminia then the herminia is latino. If something tessellate the herminia then the herminia seep the nora. The herminia does not visit the herminia.", "logic": "\nErrhine(herminia)\nTessellate(herminia, nora)\nTessellate(nora, herminia)\nErrhine(herminia) -> Mute(herminia, nora)\nforall x (Seep(x, nora) -> Tessellate(x, herminia))\nforall x (Seep(x, nora) -> Tessellate(x, nora))\nTessellate(nora, herminia) and Neither(herminia) -> Mute(herminia, nora)\nforall x (Tessellate(x, nora) and Tessellate(x, herminia) -> Latino(herminia))\nforall x (Tessellate(x, herminia) -> Seep(herminia, nora))\n\nnot Tessellate(herminia, herminia)\n\nTessellate(nora, herminia) and forall x (Tessellate(x, herminia) -> Seep(herminia, nora)) -> therefore Seep(herminia, nora) Seep(herminia, nora) and forall x (Seep(x, nora) -> Tessellate(x, herminia)) -> therefore Tessellate(herminia, herminia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The kailey is swishy. The kailey syllabize the germain. The germain syllabize the kailey. If the kailey is swishy then the kailey cinematise the germain. If something trephine the germain then it syllabize the kailey. If something trephine the germain then it syllabize the germain. If the germain syllabize the kailey and the kailey is devious then the kailey cinematise the germain. If something syllabize the germain and it syllabize the kailey then the kailey is norman. If something syllabize the kailey then the kailey trephine the germain. The kailey is norman.", "logic": "\nSwishy(kailey)\nSyllabize(kailey, germain)\nSyllabize(germain, kailey)\nSwishy(kailey) -> Cinematise(kailey, germain)\nforall x (Trephine(x, germain) -> Syllabize(x, kailey))\nforall x (Trephine(x, germain) -> Syllabize(x, germain))\nSyllabize(germain, kailey) and Devious(kailey) -> Cinematise(kailey, germain)\nforall x (Syllabize(x, germain) and Syllabize(x, kailey) -> Norman(kailey))\nforall x (Syllabize(x, kailey) -> Trephine(kailey, germain))\n\nNorman(kailey)\n\nSyllabize(germain, kailey) and forall x (Syllabize(x, kailey) -> Trephine(kailey, germain)) -> therefore Trephine(kailey, germain) Trephine(kailey, germain) and forall x (Trephine(x, germain) -> Syllabize(x, kailey)) -> therefore Syllabize(kailey, kailey) Syllabize(kailey, germain) and Syllabize(kailey, kailey) and forall x (Syllabize(x, germain) and Syllabize(x, kailey) -> Norman(kailey)) -> therefore Norman(kailey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The chevy is vaporous. The chevy splutter the eilis. The eilis splutter the chevy. If the chevy is vaporous then the chevy admix the eilis. If something outrange the eilis then it splutter the chevy. If something outrange the eilis then it splutter the eilis. If the eilis splutter the chevy and the chevy is sorted then the chevy admix the eilis. If something splutter the eilis and it splutter the chevy then the chevy is branchial. If something splutter the chevy then the chevy outrange the eilis. The chevy is not branchial.", "logic": "\nVaporous(chevy)\nSplutter(chevy, eilis)\nSplutter(eilis, chevy)\nVaporous(chevy) -> Admix(chevy, eilis)\nforall x (Outrange(x, eilis) -> Splutter(x, chevy))\nforall x (Outrange(x, eilis) -> Splutter(x, eilis))\nSplutter(eilis, chevy) and Sorted(chevy) -> Admix(chevy, eilis)\nforall x (Splutter(x, eilis) and Splutter(x, chevy) -> Branchial(chevy))\nforall x (Splutter(x, chevy) -> Outrange(chevy, eilis))\n\nnot Branchial(chevy)\n\nSplutter(eilis, chevy) and forall x (Splutter(x, chevy) -> Outrange(chevy, eilis)) -> therefore Outrange(chevy, eilis) Outrange(chevy, eilis) and forall x (Outrange(x, eilis) -> Splutter(x, chevy)) -> therefore Splutter(chevy, chevy) Splutter(chevy, eilis) and Splutter(chevy, chevy) and forall x (Splutter(x, eilis) and Splutter(x, chevy) -> Branchial(chevy)) -> therefore Branchial(chevy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The violetta is mailed. The violetta sleuth the karisa. The karisa sleuth the violetta. If the violetta is mailed then the violetta saturate the karisa. If something chink the karisa then it sleuth the violetta. If something chink the karisa then it sleuth the karisa. If the karisa sleuth the violetta and the violetta is boozy then the violetta saturate the karisa. If something sleuth the karisa and it sleuth the violetta then the violetta is notched. If something sleuth the violetta then the violetta chink the karisa. The karisa does not visit the karisa.", "logic": "\nMailed(violetta)\nSleuth(violetta, karisa)\nSleuth(karisa, violetta)\nMailed(violetta) -> Saturate(violetta, karisa)\nforall x (Chink(x, karisa) -> Sleuth(x, violetta))\nforall x (Chink(x, karisa) -> Sleuth(x, karisa))\nSleuth(karisa, violetta) and Boozy(violetta) -> Saturate(violetta, karisa)\nforall x (Sleuth(x, karisa) and Sleuth(x, violetta) -> Notched(violetta))\nforall x (Sleuth(x, violetta) -> Chink(violetta, karisa))\n\nnot Sleuth(karisa, karisa)\n\nforall x (Chink(x, karisa) -> Sleuth(x, karisa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The derick is mobile. The derick dynamite the kaleena. The kaleena dynamite the derick. If the derick is mobile then the derick loll the kaleena. If something cheep the kaleena then it dynamite the derick. If something cheep the kaleena then it dynamite the kaleena. If the kaleena dynamite the derick and the derick is varnished then the derick loll the kaleena. If something dynamite the kaleena and it dynamite the derick then the derick is filipino. If something dynamite the derick then the derick cheep the kaleena. The derick is cold.", "logic": "\nMobile(derick)\nDynamite(derick, kaleena)\nDynamite(kaleena, derick)\nMobile(derick) -> Loll(derick, kaleena)\nforall x (Cheep(x, kaleena) -> Dynamite(x, derick))\nforall x (Cheep(x, kaleena) -> Dynamite(x, kaleena))\nDynamite(kaleena, derick) and Varnished(derick) -> Loll(derick, kaleena)\nforall x (Dynamite(x, kaleena) and Dynamite(x, derick) -> Filipino(derick))\nforall x (Dynamite(x, derick) -> Cheep(derick, kaleena))\n\nCold(derick)\n\nCold(derick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The saraann is agaze. The saraann shank the clem. The clem shank the saraann. If the saraann is agaze then the saraann advise the clem. If something shut the clem then it shank the saraann. If something shut the clem then it shank the clem. If the clem shank the saraann and the saraann is antemortem then the saraann advise the clem. If something shank the clem and it shank the saraann then the saraann is underslung. If something shank the saraann then the saraann shut the clem. The saraann does not eat the saraann.", "logic": "\nAgaze(saraann)\nShank(saraann, clem)\nShank(clem, saraann)\nAgaze(saraann) -> Advise(saraann, clem)\nforall x (Shut(x, clem) -> Shank(x, saraann))\nforall x (Shut(x, clem) -> Shank(x, clem))\nShank(clem, saraann) and Antemortem(saraann) -> Advise(saraann, clem)\nforall x (Shank(x, clem) and Shank(x, saraann) -> Underslung(saraann))\nforall x (Shank(x, saraann) -> Shut(saraann, clem))\n\nnot Advise(saraann, saraann)\n\nnot Advise(saraann, saraann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The cristin is deformed. The cristin airt the elnar. The elnar airt the cristin. If the cristin is deformed then the cristin helm the elnar. If something tell the elnar then it airt the cristin. If something tell the elnar then it airt the elnar. If the elnar airt the cristin and the cristin is cognisable then the cristin helm the elnar. If something airt the elnar and it airt the cristin then the cristin is center. If something airt the cristin then the cristin tell the elnar. The elnar helm the cristin.", "logic": "\nDeformed(cristin)\nAirt(cristin, elnar)\nAirt(elnar, cristin)\nDeformed(cristin) -> Helm(cristin, elnar)\nforall x (Tell(x, elnar) -> Airt(x, cristin))\nforall x (Tell(x, elnar) -> Airt(x, elnar))\nAirt(elnar, cristin) and Cognisable(cristin) -> Helm(cristin, elnar)\nforall x (Airt(x, elnar) and Airt(x, cristin) -> Center(cristin))\nforall x (Airt(x, cristin) -> Tell(cristin, elnar))\n\nHelm(elnar, cristin)\n\nHelm(elnar, cristin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The nelly is scotch. The nelly waken the jesse. The jesse waken the nelly. If the nelly is scotch then the nelly beautify the jesse. If something spiritize the jesse then it waken the nelly. If something spiritize the jesse then it waken the jesse. If the jesse waken the nelly and the nelly is divinatory then the nelly beautify the jesse. If something waken the jesse and it waken the nelly then the nelly is loveless. If something waken the nelly then the nelly spiritize the jesse. The jesse is not loveless.", "logic": "\nScotch(nelly)\nWaken(nelly, jesse)\nWaken(jesse, nelly)\nScotch(nelly) -> Beautify(nelly, jesse)\nforall x (Spiritize(x, jesse) -> Waken(x, nelly))\nforall x (Spiritize(x, jesse) -> Waken(x, jesse))\nWaken(jesse, nelly) and Divinatory(nelly) -> Beautify(nelly, jesse)\nforall x (Waken(x, jesse) and Waken(x, nelly) -> Loveless(nelly))\nforall x (Waken(x, nelly) -> Spiritize(nelly, jesse))\n\nnot Loveless(jesse)\n\nnot Loveless(jesse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The emilie is inertial. The emilie dishevel the urson. The urson dishevel the emilie. If the emilie is inertial then the emilie crane the urson. If something marinate the urson then it dishevel the emilie. If something marinate the urson then it dishevel the urson. If the urson dishevel the emilie and the emilie is mediate then the emilie crane the urson. If something dishevel the urson and it dishevel the emilie then the emilie is highland. If something dishevel the emilie then the emilie marinate the urson. The urson marinate the emilie.", "logic": "\nInertial(emilie)\nDishevel(emilie, urson)\nDishevel(urson, emilie)\nInertial(emilie) -> Crane(emilie, urson)\nforall x (Marinate(x, urson) -> Dishevel(x, emilie))\nforall x (Marinate(x, urson) -> Dishevel(x, urson))\nDishevel(urson, emilie) and Mediate(emilie) -> Crane(emilie, urson)\nforall x (Dishevel(x, urson) and Dishevel(x, emilie) -> Highland(emilie))\nforall x (Dishevel(x, emilie) -> Marinate(emilie, urson))\n\nMarinate(urson, emilie)\n\nMarinate(urson, emilie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The lacey is eastmost. The lacey score the joanne. The joanne score the lacey. If the lacey is eastmost then the lacey itinerate the joanne. If something concretize the joanne then it score the lacey. If something concretize the joanne then it score the joanne. If the joanne score the lacey and the lacey is ionian then the lacey itinerate the joanne. If something score the joanne and it score the lacey then the lacey is scabby. If something score the lacey then the lacey concretize the joanne. The joanne is not round.", "logic": "\nEastmost(lacey)\nScore(lacey, joanne)\nScore(joanne, lacey)\nEastmost(lacey) -> Itinerate(lacey, joanne)\nforall x (Concretize(x, joanne) -> Score(x, lacey))\nforall x (Concretize(x, joanne) -> Score(x, joanne))\nScore(joanne, lacey) and Ionian(lacey) -> Itinerate(lacey, joanne)\nforall x (Score(x, joanne) and Score(x, lacey) -> Scabby(lacey))\nforall x (Score(x, lacey) -> Concretize(lacey, joanne))\n\nnot Round(joanne)\n\nnot Round(joanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The nadia is fearless. The nadia auspicate the sandi. The sandi auspicate the nadia. If the nadia is fearless then the nadia hover the sandi. If something employ the sandi then it auspicate the nadia. If something employ the sandi then it auspicate the sandi. If the sandi auspicate the nadia and the nadia is attenuate then the nadia hover the sandi. If something auspicate the sandi and it auspicate the nadia then the nadia is typic. If something auspicate the nadia then the nadia employ the sandi. The sandi is attenuate.", "logic": "\nFearless(nadia)\nAuspicate(nadia, sandi)\nAuspicate(sandi, nadia)\nFearless(nadia) -> Hover(nadia, sandi)\nforall x (Employ(x, sandi) -> Auspicate(x, nadia))\nforall x (Employ(x, sandi) -> Auspicate(x, sandi))\nAuspicate(sandi, nadia) and Attenuate(nadia) -> Hover(nadia, sandi)\nforall x (Auspicate(x, sandi) and Auspicate(x, nadia) -> Typic(nadia))\nforall x (Auspicate(x, nadia) -> Employ(nadia, sandi))\n\nAttenuate(sandi)\n\nAttenuate(sandi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Amadeus is sumerian. Stan is sumerian. Joan is percipient. Cathyleen is creepy. If something is proven and jealous then it is percipient. All unforced things are sumerian. Round, creepy things are underfed. If something is jealous and creepy then it is proven. If something is underfed then it is unforced. All underfed things are percipient. Cold things are sumerian. Young, percipient things are underfed. Joan is percipient.", "logic": "\nSumerian(amadeus)\nSumerian(stan)\nPercipient(joan)\nCreepy(cathyleen)\nforall x (Proven(x) and Jealous(x) -> Percipient(x))\nforall x (Unforced(x) -> Sumerian(x))\nforall x (Sumerian(x) and Creepy(x) -> Underfed(x))\nforall x (Jealous(x) and Creepy(x) -> Proven(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> Percipient(x))\nforall x (Creepy(x) -> Sumerian(x))\nforall x (Proven(x) and Percipient(x) -> Underfed(x))\n\nPercipient(joan)\n\ntherefore Percipient(joan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Nadine is caucasoid. Thayne is caucasoid. Tedrick is musical. Vijay is liveborn. If something is unvalued and select then it is musical. All nisi things are caucasoid. Round, liveborn things are pellucid. If something is select and liveborn then it is unvalued. If something is pellucid then it is nisi. All pellucid things are musical. Cold things are caucasoid. Young, musical things are pellucid. Thayne is not caucasoid.", "logic": "\nCaucasoid(nadine)\nCaucasoid(thayne)\nMusical(tedrick)\nLiveborn(vijay)\nforall x (Unvalued(x) and Select(x) -> Musical(x))\nforall x (Nisi(x) -> Caucasoid(x))\nforall x (Caucasoid(x) and Liveborn(x) -> Pellucid(x))\nforall x (Select(x) and Liveborn(x) -> Unvalued(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) -> Nisi(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) -> Musical(x))\nforall x (Liveborn(x) -> Caucasoid(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) and Musical(x) -> Pellucid(x))\n\nnot Caucasoid(thayne)\n\ntherefore Caucasoid(thayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Jenine is gallant. Othilia is gallant. Rudy is indistinct. Fidelity is ptolemaic. If something is leisurely and lxviii then it is indistinct. All nescient things are gallant. Round, ptolemaic things are tending. If something is lxviii and ptolemaic then it is leisurely. If something is tending then it is nescient. All tending things are indistinct. Cold things are gallant. Young, indistinct things are tending. Fidelity is gallant.", "logic": "\nGallant(jenine)\nGallant(othilia)\nIndistinct(rudy)\nPtolemaic(fidelity)\nforall x (Leisurely(x) and Lxviii(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Tending(x))\nforall x (Lxviii(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Leisurely(x))\nforall x (Tending(x) -> Nescient(x))\nforall x (Tending(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) and Indistinct(x) -> Tending(x))\n\nGallant(fidelity)\n\nPtolemaic(fidelity) and forall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Gallant(x)) -> therefore Gallant(fidelity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Denyse is aggregated. Lisandra is aggregated. Katheryn is moralistic. Kalli is cloying. If something is lxxxiv and arced then it is moralistic. All exuvial things are aggregated. Round, cloying things are unsound. If something is arced and cloying then it is lxxxiv. If something is unsound then it is exuvial. All unsound things are moralistic. Cold things are aggregated. Young, moralistic things are unsound. Kalli is not aggregated.", "logic": "\nAggregated(denyse)\nAggregated(lisandra)\nMoralistic(katheryn)\nCloying(kalli)\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) and Arced(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) and Cloying(x) -> Unsound(x))\nforall x (Arced(x) and Cloying(x) -> Lxxxiv(x))\nforall x (Unsound(x) -> Exuvial(x))\nforall x (Unsound(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Cloying(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Unsound(x))\n\nnot Aggregated(kalli)\n\nCloying(kalli) and forall x (Cloying(x) -> Aggregated(x)) -> therefore Aggregated(kalli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Fancie is aciculate. Iris is aciculate. Kare is reformed. Josefa is triclinic. If something is bareback and abstract then it is reformed. All gemmed things are aciculate. Round, triclinic things are crummy. If something is abstract and triclinic then it is bareback. If something is crummy then it is gemmed. All crummy things are reformed. Cold things are aciculate. Young, reformed things are crummy. Josefa is crummy.", "logic": "\nAciculate(fancie)\nAciculate(iris)\nReformed(kare)\nTriclinic(josefa)\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Abstract(x) -> Reformed(x))\nforall x (Gemmed(x) -> Aciculate(x))\nforall x (Aciculate(x) and Triclinic(x) -> Crummy(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x) and Triclinic(x) -> Bareback(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Gemmed(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Reformed(x))\nforall x (Triclinic(x) -> Aciculate(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Reformed(x) -> Crummy(x))\n\nCrummy(josefa)\n\nTriclinic(josefa) and forall x (Triclinic(x) -> Aciculate(x)) -> therefore Aciculate(josefa) Aciculate(josefa) and Triclinic(josefa) and forall x (Aciculate(x) and Triclinic(x) -> Crummy(x)) -> therefore Crummy(josefa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Tito is honorable. Rinaldo is honorable. Gusty is cxxx. Kittie is abyssal. If something is backstage and eared then it is cxxx. All nonspatial things are honorable. Round, abyssal things are mature. If something is eared and abyssal then it is backstage. If something is mature then it is nonspatial. All mature things are cxxx. Cold things are honorable. Young, cxxx things are mature. Kittie is not mature.", "logic": "\nHonorable(tito)\nHonorable(rinaldo)\nCxxx(gusty)\nAbyssal(kittie)\nforall x (Backstage(x) and Eared(x) -> Cxxx(x))\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Honorable(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Mature(x))\nforall x (Eared(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Backstage(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) -> Cxxx(x))\nforall x (Abyssal(x) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Backstage(x) and Cxxx(x) -> Mature(x))\n\nnot Mature(kittie)\n\nAbyssal(kittie) and forall x (Abyssal(x) -> Honorable(x)) -> therefore Honorable(kittie) Honorable(kittie) and Abyssal(kittie) and forall x (Honorable(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Mature(x)) -> therefore Mature(kittie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Magdalen is anisogamic. Magdalene is anisogamic. Hazel is strangled. Melosa is unimpeded. If something is tangled and cellular then it is strangled. All mediocre things are anisogamic. Round, unimpeded things are epilithic. If something is cellular and unimpeded then it is tangled. If something is epilithic then it is mediocre. All epilithic things are strangled. Cold things are anisogamic. Young, strangled things are epilithic. Melosa is mediocre.", "logic": "\nAnisogamic(magdalen)\nAnisogamic(magdalene)\nStrangled(hazel)\nUnimpeded(melosa)\nforall x (Tangled(x) and Cellular(x) -> Strangled(x))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Unimpeded(x) -> Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Cellular(x) and Unimpeded(x) -> Tangled(x))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) -> Strangled(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Tangled(x) and Strangled(x) -> Epilithic(x))\n\nMediocre(melosa)\n\nUnimpeded(melosa) and forall x (Unimpeded(x) -> Anisogamic(x)) -> therefore Anisogamic(melosa) Anisogamic(melosa) and Unimpeded(melosa) and forall x (Anisogamic(x) and Unimpeded(x) -> Epilithic(x)) -> therefore Epilithic(melosa) Epilithic(melosa) and forall x (Epilithic(x) -> Mediocre(x)) -> therefore Mediocre(melosa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Aristotle is ulterior. Lenore is ulterior. Jillayne is resistless. Derrol is unheated. If something is soundless and emboldened then it is resistless. All prepared things are ulterior. Round, unheated things are pyrolignic. If something is emboldened and unheated then it is soundless. If something is pyrolignic then it is prepared. All pyrolignic things are resistless. Cold things are ulterior. Young, resistless things are pyrolignic. Derrol is not resistless.", "logic": "\nUlterior(aristotle)\nUlterior(lenore)\nResistless(jillayne)\nUnheated(derrol)\nforall x (Soundless(x) and Emboldened(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Ulterior(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and Unheated(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and Unheated(x) -> Soundless(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Prepared(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Unheated(x) -> Ulterior(x))\nforall x (Soundless(x) and Resistless(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\n\nnot Resistless(derrol)\n\nUnheated(derrol) and forall x (Unheated(x) -> Ulterior(x)) -> therefore Ulterior(derrol) Ulterior(derrol) and Unheated(derrol) and forall x (Ulterior(x) and Unheated(x) -> Pyrolignic(x)) -> therefore Pyrolignic(derrol) Pyrolignic(derrol) and forall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Resistless(x)) -> therefore Resistless(derrol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Harriett is allegiant. Thibaud is allegiant. Christel is scalable. Antony is urgent. If something is unfair and overeager then it is scalable. All intrastate things are allegiant. Round, urgent things are viewless. If something is overeager and urgent then it is unfair. If something is viewless then it is intrastate. All viewless things are scalable. Cold things are allegiant. Young, scalable things are viewless. Thibaud is not viewless.", "logic": "\nAllegiant(harriett)\nAllegiant(thibaud)\nScalable(christel)\nUrgent(antony)\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Overeager(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) -> Allegiant(x))\nforall x (Allegiant(x) and Urgent(x) -> Viewless(x))\nforall x (Overeager(x) and Urgent(x) -> Unfair(x))\nforall x (Viewless(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Viewless(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Allegiant(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Scalable(x) -> Viewless(x))\n\nnot Viewless(thibaud)\n\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Scalable(x) -> Viewless(x)) <- forall x (Overeager(x) and Urgent(x) -> Unfair(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Jerrome is perfected. Jeramie is perfected. Vanna is matt. Ali is neandertal. If something is doctoral and sickish then it is matt. All cochlear things are perfected. Round, neandertal things are geodesical. If something is sickish and neandertal then it is doctoral. If something is geodesical then it is cochlear. All geodesical things are matt. Cold things are perfected. Young, matt things are geodesical. Jerrome is cochlear.", "logic": "\nPerfected(jerrome)\nPerfected(jeramie)\nMatt(vanna)\nNeandertal(ali)\nforall x (Doctoral(x) and Sickish(x) -> Matt(x))\nforall x (Cochlear(x) -> Perfected(x))\nforall x (Perfected(x) and Neandertal(x) -> Geodesical(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) and Neandertal(x) -> Doctoral(x))\nforall x (Geodesical(x) -> Cochlear(x))\nforall x (Geodesical(x) -> Matt(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> Perfected(x))\nforall x (Doctoral(x) and Matt(x) -> Geodesical(x))\n\nCochlear(jerrome)\n\nforall x (Geodesical(x) -> Cochlear(x)) <- forall x (Doctoral(x) and Matt(x) -> Geodesical(x)) <- forall x (Sickish(x) and Neandertal(x) -> Doctoral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Melloney is chintzy. Fidelity is chintzy. Vivianne is abdominous. Korry is seagirt. If something is testicular and terrene then it is abdominous. All hoofed things are chintzy. Round, seagirt things are obdurate. If something is terrene and seagirt then it is testicular. If something is obdurate then it is hoofed. All obdurate things are abdominous. Cold things are chintzy. Young, abdominous things are obdurate. Vivianne is not obdurate.", "logic": "\nChintzy(melloney)\nChintzy(fidelity)\nAbdominous(vivianne)\nSeagirt(korry)\nforall x (Testicular(x) and Terrene(x) -> Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Hoofed(x) -> Chintzy(x))\nforall x (Chintzy(x) and Seagirt(x) -> Obdurate(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Seagirt(x) -> Testicular(x))\nforall x (Obdurate(x) -> Hoofed(x))\nforall x (Obdurate(x) -> Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Seagirt(x) -> Chintzy(x))\nforall x (Testicular(x) and Abdominous(x) -> Obdurate(x))\n\nnot Obdurate(vivianne)\n\nforall x (Testicular(x) and Abdominous(x) -> Obdurate(x)) <- forall x (Terrene(x) and Seagirt(x) -> Testicular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Kylie is hemolytic. Kassey is hemolytic. Debera is glistering. Goldie is basifixed. If something is disputed and reanimated then it is glistering. All thoracic things are hemolytic. Round, basifixed things are rugged. If something is reanimated and basifixed then it is disputed. If something is rugged then it is thoracic. All rugged things are glistering. Cold things are hemolytic. Young, glistering things are rugged. Kassey is thoracic.", "logic": "\nHemolytic(kylie)\nHemolytic(kassey)\nGlistering(debera)\nBasifixed(goldie)\nforall x (Disputed(x) and Reanimated(x) -> Glistering(x))\nforall x (Thoracic(x) -> Hemolytic(x))\nforall x (Hemolytic(x) and Basifixed(x) -> Rugged(x))\nforall x (Reanimated(x) and Basifixed(x) -> Disputed(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) -> Glistering(x))\nforall x (Basifixed(x) -> Hemolytic(x))\nforall x (Disputed(x) and Glistering(x) -> Rugged(x))\n\nThoracic(kassey)\n\nforall x (Rugged(x) -> Thoracic(x)) <- forall x (Disputed(x) and Glistering(x) -> Rugged(x)) <- forall x (Reanimated(x) and Basifixed(x) -> Disputed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Bonni is unforeseen. Leora is unforeseen. Annamarie is dirty. Margret is chondritic. If something is operable and employed then it is dirty. All professed things are unforeseen. Round, chondritic things are patient. If something is employed and chondritic then it is operable. If something is patient then it is professed. All patient things are dirty. Cold things are unforeseen. Young, dirty things are patient. Bonni is not employed.", "logic": "\nUnforeseen(bonni)\nUnforeseen(leora)\nDirty(annamarie)\nChondritic(margret)\nforall x (Operable(x) and Employed(x) -> Dirty(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) -> Unforeseen(x))\nforall x (Unforeseen(x) and Chondritic(x) -> Patient(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) and Chondritic(x) -> Operable(x))\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Professed(x))\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Dirty(x))\nforall x (Chondritic(x) -> Unforeseen(x))\nforall x (Operable(x) and Dirty(x) -> Patient(x))\n\nnot Employed(bonni)\n\nnot Employed(bonni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Suki is stylistic. Gina is stylistic. Moira is ephemeral. Tera is squelched. If something is unready and pious then it is ephemeral. All tramontane things are stylistic. Round, squelched things are wigged. If something is pious and squelched then it is unready. If something is wigged then it is tramontane. All wigged things are ephemeral. Cold things are stylistic. Young, ephemeral things are wigged. Gina is squelched.", "logic": "\nStylistic(suki)\nStylistic(gina)\nEphemeral(moira)\nSquelched(tera)\nforall x (Unready(x) and Pious(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> Stylistic(x))\nforall x (Stylistic(x) and Squelched(x) -> Wigged(x))\nforall x (Pious(x) and Squelched(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Wigged(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Wigged(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Squelched(x) -> Stylistic(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Ephemeral(x) -> Wigged(x))\n\nSquelched(gina)\n\nSquelched(gina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Pieter is bountiful. Kee is bountiful. Kaia is looking. Billi is bawdy. If something is socialised and abranchial then it is looking. All cambrian things are bountiful. Round, bawdy things are phagocytic. If something is abranchial and bawdy then it is socialised. If something is phagocytic then it is cambrian. All phagocytic things are looking. Cold things are bountiful. Young, looking things are phagocytic. Kaia is not bawdy.", "logic": "\nBountiful(pieter)\nBountiful(kee)\nLooking(kaia)\nBawdy(billi)\nforall x (Socialised(x) and Abranchial(x) -> Looking(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) -> Bountiful(x))\nforall x (Bountiful(x) and Bawdy(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) and Bawdy(x) -> Socialised(x))\nforall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Looking(x))\nforall x (Bawdy(x) -> Bountiful(x))\nforall x (Socialised(x) and Looking(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\n\nnot Bawdy(kaia)\n\nnot Bawdy(kaia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Perle is underway. Lula is underway. Andreana is tubby. Zed is campestral. If something is cuspidated and carinal then it is tubby. All dreamless things are underway. Round, campestral things are braky. If something is carinal and campestral then it is cuspidated. If something is braky then it is dreamless. All braky things are tubby. Cold things are underway. Young, tubby things are braky. Lula is carinal.", "logic": "\nUnderway(perle)\nUnderway(lula)\nTubby(andreana)\nCampestral(zed)\nforall x (Cuspidated(x) and Carinal(x) -> Tubby(x))\nforall x (Dreamless(x) -> Underway(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) and Campestral(x) -> Braky(x))\nforall x (Carinal(x) and Campestral(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Dreamless(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Tubby(x))\nforall x (Campestral(x) -> Underway(x))\nforall x (Cuspidated(x) and Tubby(x) -> Braky(x))\n\nCarinal(lula)\n\nCarinal(lula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Nomi is unsugared. Nomi is eyelike. Nomi is upright. Nomi is footless. Basil is eyelike. Basil is inviolable. Basil is upright. Basil is footless. Gerta is inviolable. Gerta is clubbish. Gerta is spiritual. Gerta is footless. Tammi is inviolable. Tammi is clubbish. Tammi is spiritual. Young, clubbish things are spiritual. White things are footless. Smart, unsugared things are clubbish. All spiritual things are eyelike. Smart, spiritual things are unsugared. If Basil is upright then Basil is inviolable. If something is upright then it is spiritual. If something is unsugared and footless then it is eyelike. Nomi is upright.", "logic": "\nUnsugared(nomi)\nEyelike(nomi)\nUpright(nomi)\nFootless(nomi)\nEyelike(basil)\nInviolable(basil)\nUpright(basil)\nFootless(basil)\nInviolable(gerta)\nClubbish(gerta)\nSpiritual(gerta)\nFootless(gerta)\nInviolable(tammi)\nClubbish(tammi)\nSpiritual(tammi)\nforall x (Footless(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Spiritual(x))\nforall x (Spiritual(x) -> Footless(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) and Unsugared(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Spiritual(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) and Spiritual(x) -> Unsugared(x))\nUpright(basil) -> Inviolable(basil)\nforall x (Upright(x) -> Spiritual(x))\nforall x (Unsugared(x) and Footless(x) -> Eyelike(x))\n\nUpright(nomi)\n\ntherefore Upright(nomi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Ingelbert is xcviii. Ingelbert is misrelated. Ingelbert is equipotent. Ingelbert is mysterious. Anita is misrelated. Anita is sedentary. Anita is equipotent. Anita is mysterious. Kaye is sedentary. Kaye is malicious. Kaye is mastered. Kaye is mysterious. Sanders is sedentary. Sanders is malicious. Sanders is mastered. Young, malicious things are mastered. White things are mysterious. Smart, xcviii things are malicious. All mastered things are misrelated. Smart, mastered things are xcviii. If Anita is equipotent then Anita is sedentary. If something is equipotent then it is mastered. If something is xcviii and mysterious then it is misrelated. Sanders is not malicious.", "logic": "\nXcviii(ingelbert)\nMisrelated(ingelbert)\nEquipotent(ingelbert)\nMysterious(ingelbert)\nMisrelated(anita)\nSedentary(anita)\nEquipotent(anita)\nMysterious(anita)\nSedentary(kaye)\nMalicious(kaye)\nMastered(kaye)\nMysterious(kaye)\nSedentary(sanders)\nMalicious(sanders)\nMastered(sanders)\nforall x (Mysterious(x) and Malicious(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Mysterious(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Xcviii(x) -> Malicious(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Misrelated(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Mastered(x) -> Xcviii(x))\nEquipotent(anita) -> Sedentary(anita)\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Xcviii(x) and Mysterious(x) -> Misrelated(x))\n\nnot Malicious(sanders)\n\ntherefore Malicious(sanders)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Diamond is aware. Diamond is tramontane. Diamond is tsarist. Diamond is possessed. Aurel is tramontane. Aurel is contained. Aurel is tsarist. Aurel is possessed. Sax is contained. Sax is muciferous. Sax is nodulated. Sax is possessed. Renaldo is contained. Renaldo is muciferous. Renaldo is nodulated. Young, muciferous things are nodulated. White things are possessed. Smart, aware things are muciferous. All nodulated things are tramontane. Smart, nodulated things are aware. If Aurel is tsarist then Aurel is contained. If something is tsarist then it is nodulated. If something is aware and possessed then it is tramontane. Sax is tramontane.", "logic": "\nAware(diamond)\nTramontane(diamond)\nTsarist(diamond)\nPossessed(diamond)\nTramontane(aurel)\nContained(aurel)\nTsarist(aurel)\nPossessed(aurel)\nContained(sax)\nMuciferous(sax)\nNodulated(sax)\nPossessed(sax)\nContained(renaldo)\nMuciferous(renaldo)\nNodulated(renaldo)\nforall x (Possessed(x) and Muciferous(x) -> Nodulated(x))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Possessed(x))\nforall x (Tsarist(x) and Aware(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Tsarist(x) and Nodulated(x) -> Aware(x))\nTsarist(aurel) -> Contained(aurel)\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Nodulated(x))\nforall x (Aware(x) and Possessed(x) -> Tramontane(x))\n\nTramontane(sax)\n\nNodulated(sax) and forall x (Nodulated(x) -> Tramontane(x)) -> therefore Tramontane(sax)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Rachel is intimal. Rachel is heathlike. Rachel is estonian. Rachel is publicized. Bing is heathlike. Bing is important. Bing is estonian. Bing is publicized. Kacie is important. Kacie is stringy. Kacie is underlying. Kacie is publicized. Gershon is important. Gershon is stringy. Gershon is underlying. Young, stringy things are underlying. White things are publicized. Smart, intimal things are stringy. All underlying things are heathlike. Smart, underlying things are intimal. If Bing is estonian then Bing is important. If something is estonian then it is underlying. If something is intimal and publicized then it is heathlike. Gershon is not publicized.", "logic": "\nIntimal(rachel)\nHeathlike(rachel)\nEstonian(rachel)\nPublicized(rachel)\nHeathlike(bing)\nImportant(bing)\nEstonian(bing)\nPublicized(bing)\nImportant(kacie)\nStringy(kacie)\nUnderlying(kacie)\nPublicized(kacie)\nImportant(gershon)\nStringy(gershon)\nUnderlying(gershon)\nforall x (Publicized(x) and Stringy(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Underlying(x) -> Publicized(x))\nforall x (Estonian(x) and Intimal(x) -> Stringy(x))\nforall x (Underlying(x) -> Heathlike(x))\nforall x (Estonian(x) and Underlying(x) -> Intimal(x))\nEstonian(bing) -> Important(bing)\nforall x (Estonian(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Intimal(x) and Publicized(x) -> Heathlike(x))\n\nnot Publicized(gershon)\n\nUnderlying(gershon) and forall x (Underlying(x) -> Publicized(x)) -> therefore Publicized(gershon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Reggy is immunised. Reggy is glottal. Reggy is permutable. Reggy is runny. Karena is glottal. Karena is leftover. Karena is permutable. Karena is runny. Fairfax is leftover. Fairfax is brimfull. Fairfax is germinal. Fairfax is runny. Harvey is leftover. Harvey is brimfull. Harvey is germinal. Young, brimfull things are germinal. White things are runny. Smart, immunised things are brimfull. All germinal things are glottal. Smart, germinal things are immunised. If Karena is permutable then Karena is leftover. If something is permutable then it is germinal. If something is immunised and runny then it is glottal. Karena is immunised.", "logic": "\nImmunised(reggy)\nGlottal(reggy)\nPermutable(reggy)\nRunny(reggy)\nGlottal(karena)\nLeftover(karena)\nPermutable(karena)\nRunny(karena)\nLeftover(fairfax)\nBrimfull(fairfax)\nGerminal(fairfax)\nRunny(fairfax)\nLeftover(harvey)\nBrimfull(harvey)\nGerminal(harvey)\nforall x (Runny(x) and Brimfull(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Germinal(x) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Permutable(x) and Immunised(x) -> Brimfull(x))\nforall x (Germinal(x) -> Glottal(x))\nforall x (Permutable(x) and Germinal(x) -> Immunised(x))\nPermutable(karena) -> Leftover(karena)\nforall x (Permutable(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Immunised(x) and Runny(x) -> Glottal(x))\n\nImmunised(karena)\n\nPermutable(karena) and forall x (Permutable(x) -> Germinal(x)) -> therefore Germinal(karena) Permutable(karena) and Germinal(karena) and forall x (Permutable(x) and Germinal(x) -> Immunised(x)) -> therefore Immunised(karena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Mada is defensive. Mada is funky. Mada is tubelike. Mada is fewest. Rosamund is funky. Rosamund is twisted. Rosamund is tubelike. Rosamund is fewest. Meyer is twisted. Meyer is away. Meyer is boronic. Meyer is fewest. Mame is twisted. Mame is away. Mame is boronic. Young, away things are boronic. White things are fewest. Smart, defensive things are away. All boronic things are funky. Smart, boronic things are defensive. If Rosamund is tubelike then Rosamund is twisted. If something is tubelike then it is boronic. If something is defensive and fewest then it is funky. Rosamund is not defensive.", "logic": "\nDefensive(mada)\nFunky(mada)\nTubelike(mada)\nFewest(mada)\nFunky(rosamund)\nTwisted(rosamund)\nTubelike(rosamund)\nFewest(rosamund)\nTwisted(meyer)\nAway(meyer)\nBoronic(meyer)\nFewest(meyer)\nTwisted(mame)\nAway(mame)\nBoronic(mame)\nforall x (Fewest(x) and Away(x) -> Boronic(x))\nforall x (Boronic(x) -> Fewest(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) and Defensive(x) -> Away(x))\nforall x (Boronic(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) and Boronic(x) -> Defensive(x))\nTubelike(rosamund) -> Twisted(rosamund)\nforall x (Tubelike(x) -> Boronic(x))\nforall x (Defensive(x) and Fewest(x) -> Funky(x))\n\nnot Defensive(rosamund)\n\nTubelike(rosamund) and forall x (Tubelike(x) -> Boronic(x)) -> therefore Boronic(rosamund) Tubelike(rosamund) and Boronic(rosamund) and forall x (Tubelike(x) and Boronic(x) -> Defensive(x)) -> therefore Defensive(rosamund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Ilene is violent. Ilene is boastful. Ilene is undesirous. Ilene is fiftieth. Hendrika is boastful. Hendrika is superable. Hendrika is undesirous. Hendrika is fiftieth. Beth is superable. Beth is whippy. Beth is granitic. Beth is fiftieth. Elfrida is superable. Elfrida is whippy. Elfrida is granitic. Young, whippy things are granitic. White things are fiftieth. Smart, violent things are whippy. All granitic things are boastful. Smart, granitic things are violent. If Hendrika is undesirous then Hendrika is superable. If something is undesirous then it is granitic. If something is violent and fiftieth then it is boastful. Hendrika is whippy.", "logic": "\nViolent(ilene)\nBoastful(ilene)\nUndesirous(ilene)\nFiftieth(ilene)\nBoastful(hendrika)\nSuperable(hendrika)\nUndesirous(hendrika)\nFiftieth(hendrika)\nSuperable(beth)\nWhippy(beth)\nGranitic(beth)\nFiftieth(beth)\nSuperable(elfrida)\nWhippy(elfrida)\nGranitic(elfrida)\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) and Whippy(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Granitic(x) -> Fiftieth(x))\nforall x (Undesirous(x) and Violent(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Granitic(x) -> Boastful(x))\nforall x (Undesirous(x) and Granitic(x) -> Violent(x))\nUndesirous(hendrika) -> Superable(hendrika)\nforall x (Undesirous(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Violent(x) and Fiftieth(x) -> Boastful(x))\n\nWhippy(hendrika)\n\nUndesirous(hendrika) and forall x (Undesirous(x) -> Granitic(x)) -> therefore Granitic(hendrika) Undesirous(hendrika) and Granitic(hendrika) and forall x (Undesirous(x) and Granitic(x) -> Violent(x)) -> therefore Violent(hendrika) Undesirous(hendrika) and Violent(hendrika) and forall x (Undesirous(x) and Violent(x) -> Whippy(x)) -> therefore Whippy(hendrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Selig is homeless. Selig is anamorphic. Selig is ultimate. Selig is xxxvi. Winfield is anamorphic. Winfield is blotchy. Winfield is ultimate. Winfield is xxxvi. Erminie is blotchy. Erminie is upward. Erminie is apostolic. Erminie is xxxvi. Latisha is blotchy. Latisha is upward. Latisha is apostolic. Young, upward things are apostolic. White things are xxxvi. Smart, homeless things are upward. All apostolic things are anamorphic. Smart, apostolic things are homeless. If Winfield is ultimate then Winfield is blotchy. If something is ultimate then it is apostolic. If something is homeless and xxxvi then it is anamorphic. Winfield is not upward.", "logic": "\nHomeless(selig)\nAnamorphic(selig)\nUltimate(selig)\nXxxvi(selig)\nAnamorphic(winfield)\nBlotchy(winfield)\nUltimate(winfield)\nXxxvi(winfield)\nBlotchy(erminie)\nUpward(erminie)\nApostolic(erminie)\nXxxvi(erminie)\nBlotchy(latisha)\nUpward(latisha)\nApostolic(latisha)\nforall x (Xxxvi(x) and Upward(x) -> Apostolic(x))\nforall x (Apostolic(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) and Homeless(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Apostolic(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) and Apostolic(x) -> Homeless(x))\nUltimate(winfield) -> Blotchy(winfield)\nforall x (Ultimate(x) -> Apostolic(x))\nforall x (Homeless(x) and Xxxvi(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\n\nnot Upward(winfield)\n\nUltimate(winfield) and forall x (Ultimate(x) -> Apostolic(x)) -> therefore Apostolic(winfield) Ultimate(winfield) and Apostolic(winfield) and forall x (Ultimate(x) and Apostolic(x) -> Homeless(x)) -> therefore Homeless(winfield) Ultimate(winfield) and Homeless(winfield) and forall x (Ultimate(x) and Homeless(x) -> Upward(x)) -> therefore Upward(winfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Franni is mothy. Franni is quartan. Franni is reverend. Franni is unbent. Lura is quartan. Lura is prying. Lura is reverend. Lura is unbent. Glenn is prying. Glenn is regular. Glenn is wizardly. Glenn is unbent. Auria is prying. Auria is regular. Auria is wizardly. Young, regular things are wizardly. White things are unbent. Smart, mothy things are regular. All wizardly things are quartan. Smart, wizardly things are mothy. If Lura is reverend then Lura is prying. If something is reverend then it is wizardly. If something is mothy and unbent then it is quartan. Glenn is not mothy.", "logic": "\nMothy(franni)\nQuartan(franni)\nReverend(franni)\nUnbent(franni)\nQuartan(lura)\nPrying(lura)\nReverend(lura)\nUnbent(lura)\nPrying(glenn)\nRegular(glenn)\nWizardly(glenn)\nUnbent(glenn)\nPrying(auria)\nRegular(auria)\nWizardly(auria)\nforall x (Unbent(x) and Regular(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Unbent(x))\nforall x (Reverend(x) and Mothy(x) -> Regular(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Quartan(x))\nforall x (Reverend(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Mothy(x))\nReverend(lura) -> Prying(lura)\nforall x (Reverend(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Mothy(x) and Unbent(x) -> Quartan(x))\n\nnot Mothy(glenn)\n\nforall x (Reverend(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Mothy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Sayre is passing. Sayre is hogged. Sayre is impelled. Sayre is redemptory. Phillipe is hogged. Phillipe is siamese. Phillipe is impelled. Phillipe is redemptory. Roz is siamese. Roz is benefic. Roz is darned. Roz is redemptory. Jacenta is siamese. Jacenta is benefic. Jacenta is darned. Young, benefic things are darned. White things are redemptory. Smart, passing things are benefic. All darned things are hogged. Smart, darned things are passing. If Phillipe is impelled then Phillipe is siamese. If something is impelled then it is darned. If something is passing and redemptory then it is hogged. Jacenta is passing.", "logic": "\nPassing(sayre)\nHogged(sayre)\nImpelled(sayre)\nRedemptory(sayre)\nHogged(phillipe)\nSiamese(phillipe)\nImpelled(phillipe)\nRedemptory(phillipe)\nSiamese(roz)\nBenefic(roz)\nDarned(roz)\nRedemptory(roz)\nSiamese(jacenta)\nBenefic(jacenta)\nDarned(jacenta)\nforall x (Redemptory(x) and Benefic(x) -> Darned(x))\nforall x (Darned(x) -> Redemptory(x))\nforall x (Impelled(x) and Passing(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Darned(x) -> Hogged(x))\nforall x (Impelled(x) and Darned(x) -> Passing(x))\nImpelled(phillipe) -> Siamese(phillipe)\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> Darned(x))\nforall x (Passing(x) and Redemptory(x) -> Hogged(x))\n\nPassing(jacenta)\n\nforall x (Impelled(x) and Darned(x) -> Passing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Jonny is pouring. Jonny is zionist. Jonny is pilary. Jonny is heathlike. Britte is zionist. Britte is unshapely. Britte is pilary. Britte is heathlike. Cyb is unshapely. Cyb is musing. Cyb is rejective. Cyb is heathlike. Consuelo is unshapely. Consuelo is musing. Consuelo is rejective. Young, musing things are rejective. White things are heathlike. Smart, pouring things are musing. All rejective things are zionist. Smart, rejective things are pouring. If Britte is pilary then Britte is unshapely. If something is pilary then it is rejective. If something is pouring and heathlike then it is zionist. Consuelo is not pilary.", "logic": "\nPouring(jonny)\nZionist(jonny)\nPilary(jonny)\nHeathlike(jonny)\nZionist(britte)\nUnshapely(britte)\nPilary(britte)\nHeathlike(britte)\nUnshapely(cyb)\nMusing(cyb)\nRejective(cyb)\nHeathlike(cyb)\nUnshapely(consuelo)\nMusing(consuelo)\nRejective(consuelo)\nforall x (Heathlike(x) and Musing(x) -> Rejective(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Heathlike(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) and Pouring(x) -> Musing(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) and Rejective(x) -> Pouring(x))\nPilary(britte) -> Unshapely(britte)\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Rejective(x))\nforall x (Pouring(x) and Heathlike(x) -> Zionist(x))\n\nnot Pilary(consuelo)\n\nnot Pilary(consuelo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Mordecai is forbidding. Mordecai is excusable. Mordecai is dextrorse. Mordecai is statute. Annalena is excusable. Annalena is dissipated. Annalena is dextrorse. Annalena is statute. Catlin is dissipated. Catlin is anaplastic. Catlin is mystified. Catlin is statute. Lissa is dissipated. Lissa is anaplastic. Lissa is mystified. Young, anaplastic things are mystified. White things are statute. Smart, forbidding things are anaplastic. All mystified things are excusable. Smart, mystified things are forbidding. If Annalena is dextrorse then Annalena is dissipated. If something is dextrorse then it is mystified. If something is forbidding and statute then it is excusable. Catlin is dextrorse.", "logic": "\nForbidding(mordecai)\nExcusable(mordecai)\nDextrorse(mordecai)\nStatute(mordecai)\nExcusable(annalena)\nDissipated(annalena)\nDextrorse(annalena)\nStatute(annalena)\nDissipated(catlin)\nAnaplastic(catlin)\nMystified(catlin)\nStatute(catlin)\nDissipated(lissa)\nAnaplastic(lissa)\nMystified(lissa)\nforall x (Statute(x) and Anaplastic(x) -> Mystified(x))\nforall x (Mystified(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and Forbidding(x) -> Anaplastic(x))\nforall x (Mystified(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and Mystified(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nDextrorse(annalena) -> Dissipated(annalena)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Mystified(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) and Statute(x) -> Excusable(x))\n\nDextrorse(catlin)\n\nDextrorse(catlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Lisabeth is dispirited. If Lisabeth is dispirited then Lisabeth is fungible. All fungible people are catalytic. If Lisabeth is sinewy then Lisabeth is dispirited. Quiet people are unfocussed. If Lisabeth is fungible and Lisabeth is catalytic then Lisabeth is numidian. If Lisabeth is unfocussed and Lisabeth is not dispirited then Lisabeth is catalytic. Red people are winy. All unfocussed people are winy. Lisabeth is dispirited.", "logic": "\nDispirited(lisabeth)\nDispirited(lisabeth) -> Fungible(lisabeth)\nforall x (Fungible(x) -> Catalytic(x))\nSinewy(lisabeth) -> Dispirited(lisabeth)\nforall x (Numidian(x) -> Unfocussed(x))\nFungible(lisabeth) and Catalytic(lisabeth) -> Numidian(lisabeth)\nUnfocussed(lisabeth) and not Dispirited(lisabeth) -> Catalytic(lisabeth)\nforall x (Fungible(x) -> Winy(x))\nforall x (Unfocussed(x) -> Winy(x))\n\nDispirited(lisabeth)\n\ntherefore Dispirited(lisabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Marja is unopen. If Marja is unopen then Marja is denatured. All denatured people are mesozoic. If Marja is scabrous then Marja is unopen. Quiet people are hornlike. If Marja is denatured and Marja is mesozoic then Marja is fertile. If Marja is hornlike and Marja is not unopen then Marja is mesozoic. Red people are averse. All hornlike people are averse. Marja is not unopen.", "logic": "\nUnopen(marja)\nUnopen(marja) -> Denatured(marja)\nforall x (Denatured(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nScabrous(marja) -> Unopen(marja)\nforall x (Fertile(x) -> Hornlike(x))\nDenatured(marja) and Mesozoic(marja) -> Fertile(marja)\nHornlike(marja) and not Unopen(marja) -> Mesozoic(marja)\nforall x (Denatured(x) -> Averse(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) -> Averse(x))\n\nnot Unopen(marja)\n\ntherefore Unopen(marja)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Iolanthe is chiseled. If Iolanthe is chiseled then Iolanthe is eurafrican. All eurafrican people are seething. If Iolanthe is triumphant then Iolanthe is chiseled. Quiet people are aggregated. If Iolanthe is eurafrican and Iolanthe is seething then Iolanthe is blamed. If Iolanthe is aggregated and Iolanthe is not chiseled then Iolanthe is seething. Red people are admissible. All aggregated people are admissible. Iolanthe is eurafrican.", "logic": "\nChiseled(iolanthe)\nChiseled(iolanthe) -> Eurafrican(iolanthe)\nforall x (Eurafrican(x) -> Seething(x))\nTriumphant(iolanthe) -> Chiseled(iolanthe)\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nEurafrican(iolanthe) and Seething(iolanthe) -> Blamed(iolanthe)\nAggregated(iolanthe) and not Chiseled(iolanthe) -> Seething(iolanthe)\nforall x (Eurafrican(x) -> Admissible(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Admissible(x))\n\nEurafrican(iolanthe)\n\nChiseled(iolanthe) and Chiseled(iolanthe) -> Eurafrican(iolanthe) -> therefore Eurafrican(iolanthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Shawnee is rustless. If Shawnee is rustless then Shawnee is suitable. All suitable people are peopled. If Shawnee is anaphasic then Shawnee is rustless. Quiet people are canicular. If Shawnee is suitable and Shawnee is peopled then Shawnee is potable. If Shawnee is canicular and Shawnee is not rustless then Shawnee is peopled. Red people are blithe. All canicular people are blithe. Shawnee is not suitable.", "logic": "\nRustless(shawnee)\nRustless(shawnee) -> Suitable(shawnee)\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Peopled(x))\nAnaphasic(shawnee) -> Rustless(shawnee)\nforall x (Potable(x) -> Canicular(x))\nSuitable(shawnee) and Peopled(shawnee) -> Potable(shawnee)\nCanicular(shawnee) and not Rustless(shawnee) -> Peopled(shawnee)\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Blithe(x))\nforall x (Canicular(x) -> Blithe(x))\n\nnot Suitable(shawnee)\n\nRustless(shawnee) and Rustless(shawnee) -> Suitable(shawnee) -> therefore Suitable(shawnee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Janeta is isotropic. If Janeta is isotropic then Janeta is weary. All weary people are holozoic. If Janeta is initiatory then Janeta is isotropic. Quiet people are wondering. If Janeta is weary and Janeta is holozoic then Janeta is dislikable. If Janeta is wondering and Janeta is not isotropic then Janeta is holozoic. Red people are hopeful. All wondering people are hopeful. Janeta is hopeful.", "logic": "\nIsotropic(janeta)\nIsotropic(janeta) -> Weary(janeta)\nforall x (Weary(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nInitiatory(janeta) -> Isotropic(janeta)\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Wondering(x))\nWeary(janeta) and Holozoic(janeta) -> Dislikable(janeta)\nWondering(janeta) and not Isotropic(janeta) -> Holozoic(janeta)\nforall x (Weary(x) -> Hopeful(x))\nforall x (Wondering(x) -> Hopeful(x))\n\nHopeful(janeta)\n\nIsotropic(janeta) and Isotropic(janeta) -> Weary(janeta) -> therefore Weary(janeta) Weary(janeta) and forall x (Weary(x) -> Hopeful(x)) -> therefore Hopeful(janeta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Consuelo is supernal. If Consuelo is supernal then Consuelo is plummy. All plummy people are cathedral. If Consuelo is botulinal then Consuelo is supernal. Quiet people are middling. If Consuelo is plummy and Consuelo is cathedral then Consuelo is unblinking. If Consuelo is middling and Consuelo is not supernal then Consuelo is cathedral. Red people are hurt. All middling people are hurt. Consuelo is not cathedral.", "logic": "\nSupernal(consuelo)\nSupernal(consuelo) -> Plummy(consuelo)\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nBotulinal(consuelo) -> Supernal(consuelo)\nforall x (Unblinking(x) -> Middling(x))\nPlummy(consuelo) and Cathedral(consuelo) -> Unblinking(consuelo)\nMiddling(consuelo) and not Supernal(consuelo) -> Cathedral(consuelo)\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> Hurt(x))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Hurt(x))\n\nnot Cathedral(consuelo)\n\nSupernal(consuelo) and Supernal(consuelo) -> Plummy(consuelo) -> therefore Plummy(consuelo) Plummy(consuelo) and forall x (Plummy(x) -> Cathedral(x)) -> therefore Cathedral(consuelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Lenore is laboring. If Lenore is laboring then Lenore is wobbly. All wobbly people are practised. If Lenore is dreamy then Lenore is laboring. Quiet people are secluded. If Lenore is wobbly and Lenore is practised then Lenore is apocarpous. If Lenore is secluded and Lenore is not laboring then Lenore is practised. Red people are walleyed. All secluded people are walleyed. Lenore is apocarpous.", "logic": "\nLaboring(lenore)\nLaboring(lenore) -> Wobbly(lenore)\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Practised(x))\nDreamy(lenore) -> Laboring(lenore)\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Secluded(x))\nWobbly(lenore) and Practised(lenore) -> Apocarpous(lenore)\nSecluded(lenore) and not Laboring(lenore) -> Practised(lenore)\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Secluded(x) -> Walleyed(x))\n\nApocarpous(lenore)\n\nLaboring(lenore) and Laboring(lenore) -> Wobbly(lenore) -> therefore Wobbly(lenore) Laboring(lenore) and Laboring(lenore) -> Wobbly(lenore) -> therefore Wobbly(lenore) Wobbly(lenore) and forall x (Wobbly(x) -> Practised(x)) -> therefore Practised(lenore) Wobbly(lenore) and Practised(lenore) and Wobbly(lenore) and Practised(lenore) -> Apocarpous(lenore) -> therefore Apocarpous(lenore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Gladi is stifled. If Gladi is stifled then Gladi is aliform. All aliform people are filipino. If Gladi is stable then Gladi is stifled. Quiet people are bugged. If Gladi is aliform and Gladi is filipino then Gladi is multilane. If Gladi is bugged and Gladi is not stifled then Gladi is filipino. Red people are guileless. All bugged people are guileless. Gladi is not multilane.", "logic": "\nStifled(gladi)\nStifled(gladi) -> Aliform(gladi)\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Filipino(x))\nStable(gladi) -> Stifled(gladi)\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Bugged(x))\nAliform(gladi) and Filipino(gladi) -> Multilane(gladi)\nBugged(gladi) and not Stifled(gladi) -> Filipino(gladi)\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Bugged(x) -> Guileless(x))\n\nnot Multilane(gladi)\n\nStifled(gladi) and Stifled(gladi) -> Aliform(gladi) -> therefore Aliform(gladi) Stifled(gladi) and Stifled(gladi) -> Aliform(gladi) -> therefore Aliform(gladi) Aliform(gladi) and forall x (Aliform(x) -> Filipino(x)) -> therefore Filipino(gladi) Aliform(gladi) and Filipino(gladi) and Aliform(gladi) and Filipino(gladi) -> Multilane(gladi) -> therefore Multilane(gladi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "The bryna is murdered. The bryna economise the jayne. The erich predecease the bernadine. The erich is murdered. The jayne predecease the erich. The bernadine predecease the erich. The bernadine disbar the bryna. If something is ductless then it predecease the bryna. If something is cognate then it disbar the erich. If something predecease the bryna then it disbar the bernadine. If something predecease the bernadine then the bernadine is cognate. If something disbar the bryna and it disbar the erich then the bryna disbar the erich. If something predecease the jayne and the jayne is flawed then it predecease the erich. The bryna is murdered.", "logic": "\nMurdered(bryna)\nEconomise(bryna, jayne)\nPredecease(erich, bernadine)\nMurdered(erich)\nPredecease(jayne, erich)\nPredecease(bernadine, erich)\nDisbar(bernadine, bryna)\nforall x (Ductless(x) -> Predecease(x, bryna))\nforall x (Cognate(x) -> Disbar(x, erich))\nforall x (Predecease(x, bryna) -> Disbar(x, bernadine))\nforall x (Predecease(x, bernadine) -> Cognate(bernadine))\nforall x (Disbar(x, bryna) and Disbar(x, erich) -> Disbar(bryna, erich))\nforall x (Predecease(x, jayne) and Flawed(jayne) -> Predecease(x, erich))\n\nMurdered(bryna)\n\ntherefore Murdered(bryna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The greer is prolusory. The greer incarnate the erinna. The daryn espouse the linnet. The daryn is prolusory. The erinna espouse the daryn. The linnet espouse the daryn. The linnet quack the greer. If something is urogenital then it espouse the greer. If something is adipose then it quack the daryn. If something espouse the greer then it quack the linnet. If something espouse the linnet then the linnet is adipose. If something quack the greer and it quack the daryn then the greer quack the daryn. If something espouse the erinna and the erinna is abused then it espouse the daryn. The linnet does not eat the daryn.", "logic": "\nProlusory(greer)\nIncarnate(greer, erinna)\nEspouse(daryn, linnet)\nProlusory(daryn)\nEspouse(erinna, daryn)\nEspouse(linnet, daryn)\nQuack(linnet, greer)\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Espouse(x, greer))\nforall x (Adipose(x) -> Quack(x, daryn))\nforall x (Espouse(x, greer) -> Quack(x, linnet))\nforall x (Espouse(x, linnet) -> Adipose(linnet))\nforall x (Quack(x, greer) and Quack(x, daryn) -> Quack(greer, daryn))\nforall x (Espouse(x, erinna) and Abused(erinna) -> Espouse(x, daryn))\n\nnot Espouse(linnet, daryn)\n\ntherefore Espouse(linnet, daryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The jodi is pedagogic. The jodi nullify the grace. The tuck housebreak the urbanus. The tuck is pedagogic. The grace housebreak the tuck. The urbanus housebreak the tuck. The urbanus cabbage the jodi. If something is ataractic then it housebreak the jodi. If something is larghetto then it cabbage the tuck. If something housebreak the jodi then it cabbage the urbanus. If something housebreak the urbanus then the urbanus is larghetto. If something cabbage the jodi and it cabbage the tuck then the jodi cabbage the tuck. If something housebreak the grace and the grace is recyclable then it housebreak the tuck. The urbanus is larghetto.", "logic": "\nPedagogic(jodi)\nNullify(jodi, grace)\nHousebreak(tuck, urbanus)\nPedagogic(tuck)\nHousebreak(grace, tuck)\nHousebreak(urbanus, tuck)\nCabbage(urbanus, jodi)\nforall x (Ataractic(x) -> Housebreak(x, jodi))\nforall x (Larghetto(x) -> Cabbage(x, tuck))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, jodi) -> Cabbage(x, urbanus))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, urbanus) -> Larghetto(urbanus))\nforall x (Cabbage(x, jodi) and Cabbage(x, tuck) -> Cabbage(jodi, tuck))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, grace) and Recyclable(grace) -> Housebreak(x, tuck))\n\nLarghetto(urbanus)\n\nHousebreak(tuck, urbanus) and forall x (Housebreak(x, urbanus) -> Larghetto(urbanus)) -> therefore Larghetto(urbanus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The eartha is servo. The eartha contract the fina. The leopold carmine the sauncho. The leopold is servo. The fina carmine the leopold. The sauncho carmine the leopold. The sauncho destine the eartha. If something is liable then it carmine the eartha. If something is splendid then it destine the leopold. If something carmine the eartha then it destine the sauncho. If something carmine the sauncho then the sauncho is splendid. If something destine the eartha and it destine the leopold then the eartha destine the leopold. If something carmine the fina and the fina is bewitching then it carmine the leopold. The sauncho is not splendid.", "logic": "\nServo(eartha)\nContract(eartha, fina)\nCarmine(leopold, sauncho)\nServo(leopold)\nCarmine(fina, leopold)\nCarmine(sauncho, leopold)\nDestine(sauncho, eartha)\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Carmine(x, eartha))\nforall x (Splendid(x) -> Destine(x, leopold))\nforall x (Carmine(x, eartha) -> Destine(x, sauncho))\nforall x (Carmine(x, sauncho) -> Splendid(sauncho))\nforall x (Destine(x, eartha) and Destine(x, leopold) -> Destine(eartha, leopold))\nforall x (Carmine(x, fina) and Bewitching(fina) -> Carmine(x, leopold))\n\nnot Splendid(sauncho)\n\nCarmine(leopold, sauncho) and forall x (Carmine(x, sauncho) -> Splendid(sauncho)) -> therefore Splendid(sauncho)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The jefferey is ensiform. The jefferey cannulize the paddie. The merola gravel the della. The merola is ensiform. The paddie gravel the merola. The della gravel the merola. The della roll the jefferey. If something is reasoned then it gravel the jefferey. If something is noisy then it roll the merola. If something gravel the jefferey then it roll the della. If something gravel the della then the della is noisy. If something roll the jefferey and it roll the merola then the jefferey roll the merola. If something gravel the paddie and the paddie is neapolitan then it gravel the merola. The della roll the merola.", "logic": "\nEnsiform(jefferey)\nCannulize(jefferey, paddie)\nGravel(merola, della)\nEnsiform(merola)\nGravel(paddie, merola)\nGravel(della, merola)\nRoll(della, jefferey)\nforall x (Reasoned(x) -> Gravel(x, jefferey))\nforall x (Noisy(x) -> Roll(x, merola))\nforall x (Gravel(x, jefferey) -> Roll(x, della))\nforall x (Gravel(x, della) -> Noisy(della))\nforall x (Roll(x, jefferey) and Roll(x, merola) -> Roll(jefferey, merola))\nforall x (Gravel(x, paddie) and Neapolitan(paddie) -> Gravel(x, merola))\n\nRoll(della, merola)\n\nGravel(merola, della) and forall x (Gravel(x, della) -> Noisy(della)) -> therefore Noisy(della) Noisy(della) and forall x (Noisy(x) -> Roll(x, merola)) -> therefore Roll(della, merola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The bren is smoothed. The bren clarify the pearl. The taryn pamper the hiralal. The taryn is smoothed. The pearl pamper the taryn. The hiralal pamper the taryn. The hiralal route the bren. If something is rhomboidal then it pamper the bren. If something is twiglike then it route the taryn. If something pamper the bren then it route the hiralal. If something pamper the hiralal then the hiralal is twiglike. If something route the bren and it route the taryn then the bren route the taryn. If something pamper the pearl and the pearl is knockdown then it pamper the taryn. The hiralal does not need the taryn.", "logic": "\nSmoothed(bren)\nClarify(bren, pearl)\nPamper(taryn, hiralal)\nSmoothed(taryn)\nPamper(pearl, taryn)\nPamper(hiralal, taryn)\nRoute(hiralal, bren)\nforall x (Rhomboidal(x) -> Pamper(x, bren))\nforall x (Twiglike(x) -> Route(x, taryn))\nforall x (Pamper(x, bren) -> Route(x, hiralal))\nforall x (Pamper(x, hiralal) -> Twiglike(hiralal))\nforall x (Route(x, bren) and Route(x, taryn) -> Route(bren, taryn))\nforall x (Pamper(x, pearl) and Knockdown(pearl) -> Pamper(x, taryn))\n\nnot Route(hiralal, taryn)\n\nPamper(taryn, hiralal) and forall x (Pamper(x, hiralal) -> Twiglike(hiralal)) -> therefore Twiglike(hiralal) Twiglike(hiralal) and forall x (Twiglike(x) -> Route(x, taryn)) -> therefore Route(hiralal, taryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The inigo is cellular. The inigo resurge the priscilla. The gaby titrate the dean. The gaby is cellular. The priscilla titrate the gaby. The dean titrate the gaby. The dean defrock the inigo. If something is moldy then it titrate the inigo. If something is unsaleable then it defrock the gaby. If something titrate the inigo then it defrock the dean. If something titrate the dean then the dean is unsaleable. If something defrock the inigo and it defrock the gaby then the inigo defrock the gaby. If something titrate the priscilla and the priscilla is blistering then it titrate the gaby. The inigo defrock the gaby.", "logic": "\nCellular(inigo)\nResurge(inigo, priscilla)\nTitrate(gaby, dean)\nCellular(gaby)\nTitrate(priscilla, gaby)\nTitrate(dean, gaby)\nDefrock(dean, inigo)\nforall x (Moldy(x) -> Titrate(x, inigo))\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Defrock(x, gaby))\nforall x (Titrate(x, inigo) -> Defrock(x, dean))\nforall x (Titrate(x, dean) -> Unsaleable(dean))\nforall x (Defrock(x, inigo) and Defrock(x, gaby) -> Defrock(inigo, gaby))\nforall x (Titrate(x, priscilla) and Blistering(priscilla) -> Titrate(x, gaby))\n\nDefrock(inigo, gaby)\n\nTitrate(gaby, dean) and forall x (Titrate(x, dean) -> Unsaleable(dean)) -> therefore Unsaleable(dean) Unsaleable(dean) and forall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Defrock(x, gaby)) -> therefore Defrock(dean, gaby) Defrock(dean, inigo) and Defrock(dean, gaby) and forall x (Defrock(x, inigo) and Defrock(x, gaby) -> Defrock(inigo, gaby)) -> therefore Defrock(inigo, gaby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The juditha is kaput. The juditha redispose the amberly. The chadwick spice the jenilee. The chadwick is kaput. The amberly spice the chadwick. The jenilee spice the chadwick. The jenilee warn the juditha. If something is topknotted then it spice the juditha. If something is adoptable then it warn the chadwick. If something spice the juditha then it warn the jenilee. If something spice the jenilee then the jenilee is adoptable. If something warn the juditha and it warn the chadwick then the juditha warn the chadwick. If something spice the amberly and the amberly is greater then it spice the chadwick. The juditha does not need the chadwick.", "logic": "\nKaput(juditha)\nRedispose(juditha, amberly)\nSpice(chadwick, jenilee)\nKaput(chadwick)\nSpice(amberly, chadwick)\nSpice(jenilee, chadwick)\nWarn(jenilee, juditha)\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Spice(x, juditha))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Warn(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Spice(x, juditha) -> Warn(x, jenilee))\nforall x (Spice(x, jenilee) -> Adoptable(jenilee))\nforall x (Warn(x, juditha) and Warn(x, chadwick) -> Warn(juditha, chadwick))\nforall x (Spice(x, amberly) and Greater(amberly) -> Spice(x, chadwick))\n\nnot Warn(juditha, chadwick)\n\nSpice(chadwick, jenilee) and forall x (Spice(x, jenilee) -> Adoptable(jenilee)) -> therefore Adoptable(jenilee) Adoptable(jenilee) and forall x (Adoptable(x) -> Warn(x, chadwick)) -> therefore Warn(jenilee, chadwick) Warn(jenilee, juditha) and Warn(jenilee, chadwick) and forall x (Warn(x, juditha) and Warn(x, chadwick) -> Warn(juditha, chadwick)) -> therefore Warn(juditha, chadwick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The cicily is demeaning. The cicily disgust the sapphira. The lorilyn expose the yardley. The lorilyn is demeaning. The sapphira expose the lorilyn. The yardley expose the lorilyn. The yardley sputter the cicily. If something is fresh then it expose the cicily. If something is spikelike then it sputter the lorilyn. If something expose the cicily then it sputter the yardley. If something expose the yardley then the yardley is spikelike. If something sputter the cicily and it sputter the lorilyn then the cicily sputter the lorilyn. If something expose the sapphira and the sapphira is chimerical then it expose the lorilyn. The cicily does not eat the lorilyn.", "logic": "\nDemeaning(cicily)\nDisgust(cicily, sapphira)\nExpose(lorilyn, yardley)\nDemeaning(lorilyn)\nExpose(sapphira, lorilyn)\nExpose(yardley, lorilyn)\nSputter(yardley, cicily)\nforall x (Fresh(x) -> Expose(x, cicily))\nforall x (Spikelike(x) -> Sputter(x, lorilyn))\nforall x (Expose(x, cicily) -> Sputter(x, yardley))\nforall x (Expose(x, yardley) -> Spikelike(yardley))\nforall x (Sputter(x, cicily) and Sputter(x, lorilyn) -> Sputter(cicily, lorilyn))\nforall x (Expose(x, sapphira) and Chimerical(sapphira) -> Expose(x, lorilyn))\n\nnot Expose(cicily, lorilyn)\n\nforall x (Expose(x, sapphira) and Chimerical(sapphira) -> Expose(x, lorilyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The pattie is stroppy. The pattie abstain the hale. The simone outscore the emmalynne. The simone is stroppy. The hale outscore the simone. The emmalynne outscore the simone. The emmalynne blate the pattie. If something is untethered then it outscore the pattie. If something is rampant then it blate the simone. If something outscore the pattie then it blate the emmalynne. If something outscore the emmalynne then the emmalynne is rampant. If something blate the pattie and it blate the simone then the pattie blate the simone. If something outscore the hale and the hale is teased then it outscore the simone. The hale outscore the pattie.", "logic": "\nStroppy(pattie)\nAbstain(pattie, hale)\nOutscore(simone, emmalynne)\nStroppy(simone)\nOutscore(hale, simone)\nOutscore(emmalynne, simone)\nBlate(emmalynne, pattie)\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Outscore(x, pattie))\nforall x (Rampant(x) -> Blate(x, simone))\nforall x (Outscore(x, pattie) -> Blate(x, emmalynne))\nforall x (Outscore(x, emmalynne) -> Rampant(emmalynne))\nforall x (Blate(x, pattie) and Blate(x, simone) -> Blate(pattie, simone))\nforall x (Outscore(x, hale) and Teased(hale) -> Outscore(x, simone))\n\nOutscore(hale, pattie)\n\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Outscore(x, pattie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The shirah is bedraggled. The shirah coif the danila. The felicle advect the laryssa. The felicle is bedraggled. The danila advect the felicle. The laryssa advect the felicle. The laryssa escallop the shirah. If something is overshot then it advect the shirah. If something is stabilized then it escallop the felicle. If something advect the shirah then it escallop the laryssa. If something advect the laryssa then the laryssa is stabilized. If something escallop the shirah and it escallop the felicle then the shirah escallop the felicle. If something advect the danila and the danila is momentary then it advect the felicle. The felicle does not need the laryssa.", "logic": "\nBedraggled(shirah)\nCoif(shirah, danila)\nAdvect(felicle, laryssa)\nBedraggled(felicle)\nAdvect(danila, felicle)\nAdvect(laryssa, felicle)\nEscallop(laryssa, shirah)\nforall x (Overshot(x) -> Advect(x, shirah))\nforall x (Stabilized(x) -> Escallop(x, felicle))\nforall x (Advect(x, shirah) -> Escallop(x, laryssa))\nforall x (Advect(x, laryssa) -> Stabilized(laryssa))\nforall x (Escallop(x, shirah) and Escallop(x, felicle) -> Escallop(shirah, felicle))\nforall x (Advect(x, danila) and Momentary(danila) -> Advect(x, felicle))\n\nnot Escallop(felicle, laryssa)\n\nforall x (Advect(x, shirah) -> Escallop(x, laryssa)) <- forall x (Overshot(x) -> Advect(x, shirah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The shumeet is cancellate. The shumeet dong the adolfo. The zalman subvert the leta. The zalman is cancellate. The adolfo subvert the zalman. The leta subvert the zalman. The leta covenant the shumeet. If something is skimpy then it subvert the shumeet. If something is tainted then it covenant the zalman. If something subvert the shumeet then it covenant the leta. If something subvert the leta then the leta is tainted. If something covenant the shumeet and it covenant the zalman then the shumeet covenant the zalman. If something subvert the adolfo and the adolfo is governing then it subvert the zalman. The zalman subvert the shumeet.", "logic": "\nCancellate(shumeet)\nDong(shumeet, adolfo)\nSubvert(zalman, leta)\nCancellate(zalman)\nSubvert(adolfo, zalman)\nSubvert(leta, zalman)\nCovenant(leta, shumeet)\nforall x (Skimpy(x) -> Subvert(x, shumeet))\nforall x (Tainted(x) -> Covenant(x, zalman))\nforall x (Subvert(x, shumeet) -> Covenant(x, leta))\nforall x (Subvert(x, leta) -> Tainted(leta))\nforall x (Covenant(x, shumeet) and Covenant(x, zalman) -> Covenant(shumeet, zalman))\nforall x (Subvert(x, adolfo) and Governing(adolfo) -> Subvert(x, zalman))\n\nSubvert(zalman, shumeet)\n\nforall x (Skimpy(x) -> Subvert(x, shumeet)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The ede is utmost. The ede blurt the reza. The dirk grill the chrissy. The dirk is utmost. The reza grill the dirk. The chrissy grill the dirk. The chrissy rive the ede. If something is temporary then it grill the ede. If something is immovable then it rive the dirk. If something grill the ede then it rive the chrissy. If something grill the chrissy then the chrissy is immovable. If something rive the ede and it rive the dirk then the ede rive the dirk. If something grill the reza and the reza is pennate then it grill the dirk. The chrissy does not eat the chrissy.", "logic": "\nUtmost(ede)\nBlurt(ede, reza)\nGrill(dirk, chrissy)\nUtmost(dirk)\nGrill(reza, dirk)\nGrill(chrissy, dirk)\nRive(chrissy, ede)\nforall x (Temporary(x) -> Grill(x, ede))\nforall x (Immovable(x) -> Rive(x, dirk))\nforall x (Grill(x, ede) -> Rive(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Grill(x, chrissy) -> Immovable(chrissy))\nforall x (Rive(x, ede) and Rive(x, dirk) -> Rive(ede, dirk))\nforall x (Grill(x, reza) and Pennate(reza) -> Grill(x, dirk))\n\nnot Grill(chrissy, chrissy)\n\nnot Grill(chrissy, chrissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The breanne is barbecued. The breanne scrounge the jermayne. The lemuel mangle the pamella. The lemuel is barbecued. The jermayne mangle the lemuel. The pamella mangle the lemuel. The pamella fondle the breanne. If something is incurved then it mangle the breanne. If something is anorexic then it fondle the lemuel. If something mangle the breanne then it fondle the pamella. If something mangle the pamella then the pamella is anorexic. If something fondle the breanne and it fondle the lemuel then the breanne fondle the lemuel. If something mangle the jermayne and the jermayne is serene then it mangle the lemuel. The jermayne scrounge the lemuel.", "logic": "\nBarbecued(breanne)\nScrounge(breanne, jermayne)\nMangle(lemuel, pamella)\nBarbecued(lemuel)\nMangle(jermayne, lemuel)\nMangle(pamella, lemuel)\nFondle(pamella, breanne)\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Mangle(x, breanne))\nforall x (Anorexic(x) -> Fondle(x, lemuel))\nforall x (Mangle(x, breanne) -> Fondle(x, pamella))\nforall x (Mangle(x, pamella) -> Anorexic(pamella))\nforall x (Fondle(x, breanne) and Fondle(x, lemuel) -> Fondle(breanne, lemuel))\nforall x (Mangle(x, jermayne) and Serene(jermayne) -> Mangle(x, lemuel))\n\nScrounge(jermayne, lemuel)\n\nScrounge(jermayne, lemuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The binni is honied. The binni search the hedwig. The dacey whore the valli. The dacey is honied. The hedwig whore the dacey. The valli whore the dacey. The valli sneak the binni. If something is filarial then it whore the binni. If something is shaven then it sneak the dacey. If something whore the binni then it sneak the valli. If something whore the valli then the valli is shaven. If something sneak the binni and it sneak the dacey then the binni sneak the dacey. If something whore the hedwig and the hedwig is motherly then it whore the dacey. The hedwig does not see the binni.", "logic": "\nHonied(binni)\nSearch(binni, hedwig)\nWhore(dacey, valli)\nHonied(dacey)\nWhore(hedwig, dacey)\nWhore(valli, dacey)\nSneak(valli, binni)\nforall x (Filarial(x) -> Whore(x, binni))\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Sneak(x, dacey))\nforall x (Whore(x, binni) -> Sneak(x, valli))\nforall x (Whore(x, valli) -> Shaven(valli))\nforall x (Sneak(x, binni) and Sneak(x, dacey) -> Sneak(binni, dacey))\nforall x (Whore(x, hedwig) and Motherly(hedwig) -> Whore(x, dacey))\n\nnot Search(hedwig, binni)\n\nnot Search(hedwig, binni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The mag is upstanding. The mag peep the katharyn. The emmit concertise the axel. The emmit is upstanding. The katharyn concertise the emmit. The axel concertise the emmit. The axel moisturize the mag. If something is accusative then it concertise the mag. If something is lucifugous then it moisturize the emmit. If something concertise the mag then it moisturize the axel. If something concertise the axel then the axel is lucifugous. If something moisturize the mag and it moisturize the emmit then the mag moisturize the emmit. If something concertise the katharyn and the katharyn is cheapjack then it concertise the emmit. The axel concertise the katharyn.", "logic": "\nUpstanding(mag)\nPeep(mag, katharyn)\nConcertise(emmit, axel)\nUpstanding(emmit)\nConcertise(katharyn, emmit)\nConcertise(axel, emmit)\nMoisturize(axel, mag)\nforall x (Accusative(x) -> Concertise(x, mag))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) -> Moisturize(x, emmit))\nforall x (Concertise(x, mag) -> Moisturize(x, axel))\nforall x (Concertise(x, axel) -> Lucifugous(axel))\nforall x (Moisturize(x, mag) and Moisturize(x, emmit) -> Moisturize(mag, emmit))\nforall x (Concertise(x, katharyn) and Cheapjack(katharyn) -> Concertise(x, emmit))\n\nConcertise(axel, katharyn)\n\nConcertise(axel, katharyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The sydelle burden the jeanie. The sydelle is offsides. The sydelle crease the abe. The sydelle crease the jeanie. The sydelle does not visit the abe. The abe manage the ofilia. The ofilia burden the abe. The ofilia does not eat the jeanie. The ofilia is decrepit. The ofilia manage the sydelle. The jeanie is registered. The jeanie crease the sydelle. If something crease the sydelle and the sydelle is offsides then the sydelle burden the ofilia. If something crease the abe and the abe burden the sydelle then the sydelle burden the ofilia. If something is unsuitable then it manage the jeanie. If the abe burden the ofilia then the abe does not see the ofilia. If something burden the jeanie then it burden the sydelle. If something is offsides and it burden the ofilia then the ofilia is unsuitable. If the jeanie is not fanciful then the jeanie burden the sydelle. If something manage the sydelle then the sydelle does not see the ofilia. The ofilia burden the abe.", "logic": "\nBurden(sydelle, jeanie)\nOffsides(sydelle)\nCrease(sydelle, abe)\nCrease(sydelle, jeanie)\nnot Manage(sydelle, abe)\nManage(abe, ofilia)\nBurden(ofilia, abe)\nnot Burden(ofilia, jeanie)\nDecrepit(ofilia)\nManage(ofilia, sydelle)\nRegistered(jeanie)\nCrease(jeanie, sydelle)\nforall x (Crease(x, sydelle) and Offsides(sydelle) -> Burden(sydelle, ofilia))\nforall x (Crease(x, abe) and Burden(abe, sydelle) -> Burden(sydelle, ofilia))\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Manage(x, jeanie))\nBurden(abe, ofilia) -> not Crease(abe, ofilia)\nforall x (Burden(x, jeanie) -> Burden(x, sydelle))\nforall x (Offsides(x) and Burden(x, ofilia) -> Unsuitable(ofilia))\nnot Fanciful(jeanie) -> Burden(jeanie, sydelle)\nforall x (Manage(x, sydelle) -> not Crease(sydelle, ofilia))\n\nBurden(ofilia, abe)\n\ntherefore Burden(ofilia, abe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The chloe arouse the sheelagh. The chloe is chalybeate. The chloe tootle the maura. The chloe tootle the sheelagh. The chloe does not visit the maura. The maura bathe the thelma. The thelma arouse the maura. The thelma does not eat the sheelagh. The thelma is spindly. The thelma bathe the chloe. The sheelagh is decreed. The sheelagh tootle the chloe. If something tootle the chloe and the chloe is chalybeate then the chloe arouse the thelma. If something tootle the maura and the maura arouse the chloe then the chloe arouse the thelma. If something is fabulous then it bathe the sheelagh. If the maura arouse the thelma then the maura does not see the thelma. If something arouse the sheelagh then it arouse the chloe. If something is chalybeate and it arouse the thelma then the thelma is fabulous. If the sheelagh is not vulvar then the sheelagh arouse the chloe. If something bathe the chloe then the chloe does not see the thelma. The maura does not visit the thelma.", "logic": "\nArouse(chloe, sheelagh)\nChalybeate(chloe)\nTootle(chloe, maura)\nTootle(chloe, sheelagh)\nnot Bathe(chloe, maura)\nBathe(maura, thelma)\nArouse(thelma, maura)\nnot Arouse(thelma, sheelagh)\nSpindly(thelma)\nBathe(thelma, chloe)\nDecreed(sheelagh)\nTootle(sheelagh, chloe)\nforall x (Tootle(x, chloe) and Chalybeate(chloe) -> Arouse(chloe, thelma))\nforall x (Tootle(x, maura) and Arouse(maura, chloe) -> Arouse(chloe, thelma))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) -> Bathe(x, sheelagh))\nArouse(maura, thelma) -> not Tootle(maura, thelma)\nforall x (Arouse(x, sheelagh) -> Arouse(x, chloe))\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) and Arouse(x, thelma) -> Fabulous(thelma))\nnot Vulvar(sheelagh) -> Arouse(sheelagh, chloe)\nforall x (Bathe(x, chloe) -> not Tootle(chloe, thelma))\n\nnot Bathe(maura, thelma)\n\ntherefore Bathe(maura, thelma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The bess doze the silvanus. The bess is cretaceous. The bess shore the fowler. The bess shore the silvanus. The bess does not visit the fowler. The fowler titter the rosella. The rosella doze the fowler. The rosella does not eat the silvanus. The rosella is known. The rosella titter the bess. The silvanus is campy. The silvanus shore the bess. If something shore the bess and the bess is cretaceous then the bess doze the rosella. If something shore the fowler and the fowler doze the bess then the bess doze the rosella. If something is jaded then it titter the silvanus. If the fowler doze the rosella then the fowler does not see the rosella. If something doze the silvanus then it doze the bess. If something is cretaceous and it doze the rosella then the rosella is jaded. If the silvanus is not valorous then the silvanus doze the bess. If something titter the bess then the bess does not see the rosella. The bess doze the bess.", "logic": "\nDoze(bess, silvanus)\nCretaceous(bess)\nShore(bess, fowler)\nShore(bess, silvanus)\nnot Titter(bess, fowler)\nTitter(fowler, rosella)\nDoze(rosella, fowler)\nnot Doze(rosella, silvanus)\nKnown(rosella)\nTitter(rosella, bess)\nCampy(silvanus)\nShore(silvanus, bess)\nforall x (Shore(x, bess) and Cretaceous(bess) -> Doze(bess, rosella))\nforall x (Shore(x, fowler) and Doze(fowler, bess) -> Doze(bess, rosella))\nforall x (Jaded(x) -> Titter(x, silvanus))\nDoze(fowler, rosella) -> not Shore(fowler, rosella)\nforall x (Doze(x, silvanus) -> Doze(x, bess))\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) and Doze(x, rosella) -> Jaded(rosella))\nnot Valorous(silvanus) -> Doze(silvanus, bess)\nforall x (Titter(x, bess) -> not Shore(bess, rosella))\n\nDoze(bess, bess)\n\nDoze(bess, silvanus) and forall x (Doze(x, silvanus) -> Doze(x, bess)) -> therefore Doze(bess, bess)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The alecia tamper the rourke. The alecia is cussed. The alecia currycomb the joanie. The alecia currycomb the rourke. The alecia does not visit the joanie. The joanie malversate the gabbie. The gabbie tamper the joanie. The gabbie does not eat the rourke. The gabbie is appealable. The gabbie malversate the alecia. The rourke is spayed. The rourke currycomb the alecia. If something currycomb the alecia and the alecia is cussed then the alecia tamper the gabbie. If something currycomb the joanie and the joanie tamper the alecia then the alecia tamper the gabbie. If something is fijian then it malversate the rourke. If the joanie tamper the gabbie then the joanie does not see the gabbie. If something tamper the rourke then it tamper the alecia. If something is cussed and it tamper the gabbie then the gabbie is fijian. If the rourke is not tricuspid then the rourke tamper the alecia. If something malversate the alecia then the alecia does not see the gabbie. The alecia does not eat the alecia.", "logic": "\nTamper(alecia, rourke)\nCussed(alecia)\nCurrycomb(alecia, joanie)\nCurrycomb(alecia, rourke)\nnot Malversate(alecia, joanie)\nMalversate(joanie, gabbie)\nTamper(gabbie, joanie)\nnot Tamper(gabbie, rourke)\nAppealable(gabbie)\nMalversate(gabbie, alecia)\nSpayed(rourke)\nCurrycomb(rourke, alecia)\nforall x (Currycomb(x, alecia) and Cussed(alecia) -> Tamper(alecia, gabbie))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, joanie) and Tamper(joanie, alecia) -> Tamper(alecia, gabbie))\nforall x (Fijian(x) -> Malversate(x, rourke))\nTamper(joanie, gabbie) -> not Currycomb(joanie, gabbie)\nforall x (Tamper(x, rourke) -> Tamper(x, alecia))\nforall x (Cussed(x) and Tamper(x, gabbie) -> Fijian(gabbie))\nnot Tricuspid(rourke) -> Tamper(rourke, alecia)\nforall x (Malversate(x, alecia) -> not Currycomb(alecia, gabbie))\n\nnot Tamper(alecia, alecia)\n\nTamper(alecia, rourke) and forall x (Tamper(x, rourke) -> Tamper(x, alecia)) -> therefore Tamper(alecia, alecia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The alyson abolish the nicole. The alyson is postpaid. The alyson cuss the bobbette. The alyson cuss the nicole. The alyson does not visit the bobbette. The bobbette truss the dasya. The dasya abolish the bobbette. The dasya does not eat the nicole. The dasya is comatose. The dasya truss the alyson. The nicole is hircine. The nicole cuss the alyson. If something cuss the alyson and the alyson is postpaid then the alyson abolish the dasya. If something cuss the bobbette and the bobbette abolish the alyson then the alyson abolish the dasya. If something is antiviral then it truss the nicole. If the bobbette abolish the dasya then the bobbette does not see the dasya. If something abolish the nicole then it abolish the alyson. If something is postpaid and it abolish the dasya then the dasya is antiviral. If the nicole is not extensile then the nicole abolish the alyson. If something truss the alyson then the alyson does not see the dasya. The dasya is antiviral.", "logic": "\nAbolish(alyson, nicole)\nPostpaid(alyson)\nCuss(alyson, bobbette)\nCuss(alyson, nicole)\nnot Truss(alyson, bobbette)\nTruss(bobbette, dasya)\nAbolish(dasya, bobbette)\nnot Abolish(dasya, nicole)\nComatose(dasya)\nTruss(dasya, alyson)\nHircine(nicole)\nCuss(nicole, alyson)\nforall x (Cuss(x, alyson) and Postpaid(alyson) -> Abolish(alyson, dasya))\nforall x (Cuss(x, bobbette) and Abolish(bobbette, alyson) -> Abolish(alyson, dasya))\nforall x (Antiviral(x) -> Truss(x, nicole))\nAbolish(bobbette, dasya) -> not Cuss(bobbette, dasya)\nforall x (Abolish(x, nicole) -> Abolish(x, alyson))\nforall x (Postpaid(x) and Abolish(x, dasya) -> Antiviral(dasya))\nnot Extensile(nicole) -> Abolish(nicole, alyson)\nforall x (Truss(x, alyson) -> not Cuss(alyson, dasya))\n\nAntiviral(dasya)\n\nCuss(nicole, alyson) and Postpaid(alyson) and forall x (Cuss(x, alyson) and Postpaid(alyson) -> Abolish(alyson, dasya)) -> therefore Abolish(alyson, dasya) Postpaid(alyson) and Abolish(alyson, dasya) and forall x (Postpaid(x) and Abolish(x, dasya) -> Antiviral(dasya)) -> therefore Antiviral(dasya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The brea dispense the corrine. The brea is spirant. The brea blister the luanna. The brea blister the corrine. The brea does not visit the luanna. The luanna satellite the theodora. The theodora dispense the luanna. The theodora does not eat the corrine. The theodora is tyrannic. The theodora satellite the brea. The corrine is muggy. The corrine blister the brea. If something blister the brea and the brea is spirant then the brea dispense the theodora. If something blister the luanna and the luanna dispense the brea then the brea dispense the theodora. If something is masterful then it satellite the corrine. If the luanna dispense the theodora then the luanna does not see the theodora. If something dispense the corrine then it dispense the brea. If something is spirant and it dispense the theodora then the theodora is masterful. If the corrine is not boorish then the corrine dispense the brea. If something satellite the brea then the brea does not see the theodora. The theodora is not masterful.", "logic": "\nDispense(brea, corrine)\nSpirant(brea)\nBlister(brea, luanna)\nBlister(brea, corrine)\nnot Satellite(brea, luanna)\nSatellite(luanna, theodora)\nDispense(theodora, luanna)\nnot Dispense(theodora, corrine)\nTyrannic(theodora)\nSatellite(theodora, brea)\nMuggy(corrine)\nBlister(corrine, brea)\nforall x (Blister(x, brea) and Spirant(brea) -> Dispense(brea, theodora))\nforall x (Blister(x, luanna) and Dispense(luanna, brea) -> Dispense(brea, theodora))\nforall x (Masterful(x) -> Satellite(x, corrine))\nDispense(luanna, theodora) -> not Blister(luanna, theodora)\nforall x (Dispense(x, corrine) -> Dispense(x, brea))\nforall x (Spirant(x) and Dispense(x, theodora) -> Masterful(theodora))\nnot Boorish(corrine) -> Dispense(corrine, brea)\nforall x (Satellite(x, brea) -> not Blister(brea, theodora))\n\nnot Masterful(theodora)\n\nBlister(corrine, brea) and Spirant(brea) and forall x (Blister(x, brea) and Spirant(brea) -> Dispense(brea, theodora)) -> therefore Dispense(brea, theodora) Spirant(brea) and Dispense(brea, theodora) and forall x (Spirant(x) and Dispense(x, theodora) -> Masterful(theodora)) -> therefore Masterful(theodora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The layla crow the daisy. The layla is steamed. The layla relace the seymour. The layla relace the daisy. The layla does not visit the seymour. The seymour flour the marnia. The marnia crow the seymour. The marnia does not eat the daisy. The marnia is respected. The marnia flour the layla. The daisy is lymphoid. The daisy relace the layla. If something relace the layla and the layla is steamed then the layla crow the marnia. If something relace the seymour and the seymour crow the layla then the layla crow the marnia. If something is xxvii then it flour the daisy. If the seymour crow the marnia then the seymour does not see the marnia. If something crow the daisy then it crow the layla. If something is steamed and it crow the marnia then the marnia is xxvii. If the daisy is not unchanging then the daisy crow the layla. If something flour the layla then the layla does not see the marnia. The marnia flour the daisy.", "logic": "\nCrow(layla, daisy)\nSteamed(layla)\nRelace(layla, seymour)\nRelace(layla, daisy)\nnot Flour(layla, seymour)\nFlour(seymour, marnia)\nCrow(marnia, seymour)\nnot Crow(marnia, daisy)\nRespected(marnia)\nFlour(marnia, layla)\nLymphoid(daisy)\nRelace(daisy, layla)\nforall x (Relace(x, layla) and Steamed(layla) -> Crow(layla, marnia))\nforall x (Relace(x, seymour) and Crow(seymour, layla) -> Crow(layla, marnia))\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> Flour(x, daisy))\nCrow(seymour, marnia) -> not Relace(seymour, marnia)\nforall x (Crow(x, daisy) -> Crow(x, layla))\nforall x (Steamed(x) and Crow(x, marnia) -> Xxvii(marnia))\nnot Unchanging(daisy) -> Crow(daisy, layla)\nforall x (Flour(x, layla) -> not Relace(layla, marnia))\n\nFlour(marnia, daisy)\n\nRelace(daisy, layla) and Steamed(layla) and forall x (Relace(x, layla) and Steamed(layla) -> Crow(layla, marnia)) -> therefore Crow(layla, marnia) Steamed(layla) and Crow(layla, marnia) and forall x (Steamed(x) and Crow(x, marnia) -> Xxvii(marnia)) -> therefore Xxvii(marnia) Xxvii(marnia) and forall x (Xxvii(x) -> Flour(x, daisy)) -> therefore Flour(marnia, daisy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The bernette grubstake the win. The bernette is backhanded. The bernette flag the hiro. The bernette flag the win. The bernette does not visit the hiro. The hiro enslave the lois. The lois grubstake the hiro. The lois does not eat the win. The lois is afoul. The lois enslave the bernette. The win is nonsweet. The win flag the bernette. If something flag the bernette and the bernette is backhanded then the bernette grubstake the lois. If something flag the hiro and the hiro grubstake the bernette then the bernette grubstake the lois. If something is luculent then it enslave the win. If the hiro grubstake the lois then the hiro does not see the lois. If something grubstake the win then it grubstake the bernette. If something is backhanded and it grubstake the lois then the lois is luculent. If the win is not copasetic then the win grubstake the bernette. If something enslave the bernette then the bernette does not see the lois. The lois does not visit the win.", "logic": "\nGrubstake(bernette, win)\nBackhanded(bernette)\nFlag(bernette, hiro)\nFlag(bernette, win)\nnot Enslave(bernette, hiro)\nEnslave(hiro, lois)\nGrubstake(lois, hiro)\nnot Grubstake(lois, win)\nAfoul(lois)\nEnslave(lois, bernette)\nNonsweet(win)\nFlag(win, bernette)\nforall x (Flag(x, bernette) and Backhanded(bernette) -> Grubstake(bernette, lois))\nforall x (Flag(x, hiro) and Grubstake(hiro, bernette) -> Grubstake(bernette, lois))\nforall x (Luculent(x) -> Enslave(x, win))\nGrubstake(hiro, lois) -> not Flag(hiro, lois)\nforall x (Grubstake(x, win) -> Grubstake(x, bernette))\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Grubstake(x, lois) -> Luculent(lois))\nnot Copasetic(win) -> Grubstake(win, bernette)\nforall x (Enslave(x, bernette) -> not Flag(bernette, lois))\n\nnot Enslave(lois, win)\n\nFlag(win, bernette) and Backhanded(bernette) and forall x (Flag(x, bernette) and Backhanded(bernette) -> Grubstake(bernette, lois)) -> therefore Grubstake(bernette, lois) Backhanded(bernette) and Grubstake(bernette, lois) and forall x (Backhanded(x) and Grubstake(x, lois) -> Luculent(lois)) -> therefore Luculent(lois) Luculent(lois) and forall x (Luculent(x) -> Enslave(x, win)) -> therefore Enslave(lois, win)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The jody debunk the silvana. The jody is soundless. The jody store the melesa. The jody store the silvana. The jody does not visit the melesa. The melesa anchor the denise. The denise debunk the melesa. The denise does not eat the silvana. The denise is tyrannous. The denise anchor the jody. The silvana is abhorrent. The silvana store the jody. If something store the jody and the jody is soundless then the jody debunk the denise. If something store the melesa and the melesa debunk the jody then the jody debunk the denise. If something is queer then it anchor the silvana. If the melesa debunk the denise then the melesa does not see the denise. If something debunk the silvana then it debunk the jody. If something is soundless and it debunk the denise then the denise is queer. If the silvana is not monthly then the silvana debunk the jody. If something anchor the jody then the jody does not see the denise. The silvana does not eat the jody.", "logic": "\nDebunk(jody, silvana)\nSoundless(jody)\nStore(jody, melesa)\nStore(jody, silvana)\nnot Anchor(jody, melesa)\nAnchor(melesa, denise)\nDebunk(denise, melesa)\nnot Debunk(denise, silvana)\nTyrannous(denise)\nAnchor(denise, jody)\nAbhorrent(silvana)\nStore(silvana, jody)\nforall x (Store(x, jody) and Soundless(jody) -> Debunk(jody, denise))\nforall x (Store(x, melesa) and Debunk(melesa, jody) -> Debunk(jody, denise))\nforall x (Queer(x) -> Anchor(x, silvana))\nDebunk(melesa, denise) -> not Store(melesa, denise)\nforall x (Debunk(x, silvana) -> Debunk(x, jody))\nforall x (Soundless(x) and Debunk(x, denise) -> Queer(denise))\nnot Monthly(silvana) -> Debunk(silvana, jody)\nforall x (Anchor(x, jody) -> not Store(jody, denise))\n\nnot Debunk(silvana, jody)\n\nforall x (Debunk(x, silvana) -> Debunk(x, jody)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The jemmie prohibit the tammy. The jemmie is spoken. The jemmie ordain the krista. The jemmie ordain the tammy. The jemmie does not visit the krista. The krista masticate the ruddie. The ruddie prohibit the krista. The ruddie does not eat the tammy. The ruddie is walloping. The ruddie masticate the jemmie. The tammy is reducible. The tammy ordain the jemmie. If something ordain the jemmie and the jemmie is spoken then the jemmie prohibit the ruddie. If something ordain the krista and the krista prohibit the jemmie then the jemmie prohibit the ruddie. If something is froward then it masticate the tammy. If the krista prohibit the ruddie then the krista does not see the ruddie. If something prohibit the tammy then it prohibit the jemmie. If something is spoken and it prohibit the ruddie then the ruddie is froward. If the tammy is not heady then the tammy prohibit the jemmie. If something masticate the jemmie then the jemmie does not see the ruddie. The jemmie masticate the tammy.", "logic": "\nProhibit(jemmie, tammy)\nSpoken(jemmie)\nOrdain(jemmie, krista)\nOrdain(jemmie, tammy)\nnot Masticate(jemmie, krista)\nMasticate(krista, ruddie)\nProhibit(ruddie, krista)\nnot Prohibit(ruddie, tammy)\nWalloping(ruddie)\nMasticate(ruddie, jemmie)\nReducible(tammy)\nOrdain(tammy, jemmie)\nforall x (Ordain(x, jemmie) and Spoken(jemmie) -> Prohibit(jemmie, ruddie))\nforall x (Ordain(x, krista) and Prohibit(krista, jemmie) -> Prohibit(jemmie, ruddie))\nforall x (Froward(x) -> Masticate(x, tammy))\nProhibit(krista, ruddie) -> not Ordain(krista, ruddie)\nforall x (Prohibit(x, tammy) -> Prohibit(x, jemmie))\nforall x (Spoken(x) and Prohibit(x, ruddie) -> Froward(ruddie))\nnot Heady(tammy) -> Prohibit(tammy, jemmie)\nforall x (Masticate(x, jemmie) -> not Ordain(jemmie, ruddie))\n\nMasticate(jemmie, tammy)\n\nforall x (Froward(x) -> Masticate(x, tammy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The samuela laud the ximenes. The samuela is ghostlike. The samuela undock the bab. The samuela undock the ximenes. The samuela does not visit the bab. The bab deplane the minnie. The minnie laud the bab. The minnie does not eat the ximenes. The minnie is taxing. The minnie deplane the samuela. The ximenes is captivated. The ximenes undock the samuela. If something undock the samuela and the samuela is ghostlike then the samuela laud the minnie. If something undock the bab and the bab laud the samuela then the samuela laud the minnie. If something is pontifical then it deplane the ximenes. If the bab laud the minnie then the bab does not see the minnie. If something laud the ximenes then it laud the samuela. If something is ghostlike and it laud the minnie then the minnie is pontifical. If the ximenes is not assistive then the ximenes laud the samuela. If something deplane the samuela then the samuela does not see the minnie. The minnie does not eat the samuela.", "logic": "\nLaud(samuela, ximenes)\nGhostlike(samuela)\nUndock(samuela, bab)\nUndock(samuela, ximenes)\nnot Deplane(samuela, bab)\nDeplane(bab, minnie)\nLaud(minnie, bab)\nnot Laud(minnie, ximenes)\nTaxing(minnie)\nDeplane(minnie, samuela)\nCaptivated(ximenes)\nUndock(ximenes, samuela)\nforall x (Undock(x, samuela) and Ghostlike(samuela) -> Laud(samuela, minnie))\nforall x (Undock(x, bab) and Laud(bab, samuela) -> Laud(samuela, minnie))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> Deplane(x, ximenes))\nLaud(bab, minnie) -> not Undock(bab, minnie)\nforall x (Laud(x, ximenes) -> Laud(x, samuela))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) and Laud(x, minnie) -> Pontifical(minnie))\nnot Assistive(ximenes) -> Laud(ximenes, samuela)\nforall x (Deplane(x, samuela) -> not Undock(samuela, minnie))\n\nnot Laud(minnie, samuela)\n\nforall x (Laud(x, ximenes) -> Laud(x, samuela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The austin land the herbie. The austin is embryonic. The austin legalise the antonino. The austin legalise the herbie. The austin does not visit the antonino. The antonino issue the frieda. The frieda land the antonino. The frieda does not eat the herbie. The frieda is arabian. The frieda issue the austin. The herbie is authorized. The herbie legalise the austin. If something legalise the austin and the austin is embryonic then the austin land the frieda. If something legalise the antonino and the antonino land the austin then the austin land the frieda. If something is jewelled then it issue the herbie. If the antonino land the frieda then the antonino does not see the frieda. If something land the herbie then it land the austin. If something is embryonic and it land the frieda then the frieda is jewelled. If the herbie is not drafty then the herbie land the austin. If something issue the austin then the austin does not see the frieda. The herbie issue the herbie.", "logic": "\nLand(austin, herbie)\nEmbryonic(austin)\nLegalise(austin, antonino)\nLegalise(austin, herbie)\nnot Issue(austin, antonino)\nIssue(antonino, frieda)\nLand(frieda, antonino)\nnot Land(frieda, herbie)\nArabian(frieda)\nIssue(frieda, austin)\nAuthorized(herbie)\nLegalise(herbie, austin)\nforall x (Legalise(x, austin) and Embryonic(austin) -> Land(austin, frieda))\nforall x (Legalise(x, antonino) and Land(antonino, austin) -> Land(austin, frieda))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Issue(x, herbie))\nLand(antonino, frieda) -> not Legalise(antonino, frieda)\nforall x (Land(x, herbie) -> Land(x, austin))\nforall x (Embryonic(x) and Land(x, frieda) -> Jewelled(frieda))\nnot Drafty(herbie) -> Land(herbie, austin)\nforall x (Issue(x, austin) -> not Legalise(austin, frieda))\n\nIssue(herbie, herbie)\n\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Issue(x, herbie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The milena mastermind the revkah. The milena is iatrogenic. The milena cage the magdaia. The milena cage the revkah. The milena does not visit the magdaia. The magdaia ingeminate the raye. The raye mastermind the magdaia. The raye does not eat the revkah. The raye is mechanised. The raye ingeminate the milena. The revkah is stung. The revkah cage the milena. If something cage the milena and the milena is iatrogenic then the milena mastermind the raye. If something cage the magdaia and the magdaia mastermind the milena then the milena mastermind the raye. If something is awful then it ingeminate the revkah. If the magdaia mastermind the raye then the magdaia does not see the raye. If something mastermind the revkah then it mastermind the milena. If something is iatrogenic and it mastermind the raye then the raye is awful. If the revkah is not imaginable then the revkah mastermind the milena. If something ingeminate the milena then the milena does not see the raye. The revkah does not eat the magdaia.", "logic": "\nMastermind(milena, revkah)\nIatrogenic(milena)\nCage(milena, magdaia)\nCage(milena, revkah)\nnot Ingeminate(milena, magdaia)\nIngeminate(magdaia, raye)\nMastermind(raye, magdaia)\nnot Mastermind(raye, revkah)\nMechanised(raye)\nIngeminate(raye, milena)\nStung(revkah)\nCage(revkah, milena)\nforall x (Cage(x, milena) and Iatrogenic(milena) -> Mastermind(milena, raye))\nforall x (Cage(x, magdaia) and Mastermind(magdaia, milena) -> Mastermind(milena, raye))\nforall x (Awful(x) -> Ingeminate(x, revkah))\nMastermind(magdaia, raye) -> not Cage(magdaia, raye)\nforall x (Mastermind(x, revkah) -> Mastermind(x, milena))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) and Mastermind(x, raye) -> Awful(raye))\nnot Imaginable(revkah) -> Mastermind(revkah, milena)\nforall x (Ingeminate(x, milena) -> not Cage(milena, raye))\n\nnot Mastermind(revkah, magdaia)\n\nnot Mastermind(revkah, magdaia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The ellie pull the angelico. The ellie is routine. The ellie cosset the henrique. The ellie cosset the angelico. The ellie does not visit the henrique. The henrique sunburn the olga. The olga pull the henrique. The olga does not eat the angelico. The olga is neapolitan. The olga sunburn the ellie. The angelico is noticeable. The angelico cosset the ellie. If something cosset the ellie and the ellie is routine then the ellie pull the olga. If something cosset the henrique and the henrique pull the ellie then the ellie pull the olga. If something is eastmost then it sunburn the angelico. If the henrique pull the olga then the henrique does not see the olga. If something pull the angelico then it pull the ellie. If something is routine and it pull the olga then the olga is eastmost. If the angelico is not assamese then the angelico pull the ellie. If something sunburn the ellie then the ellie does not see the olga. The ellie is noticeable.", "logic": "\nPull(ellie, angelico)\nRoutine(ellie)\nCosset(ellie, henrique)\nCosset(ellie, angelico)\nnot Sunburn(ellie, henrique)\nSunburn(henrique, olga)\nPull(olga, henrique)\nnot Pull(olga, angelico)\nNeapolitan(olga)\nSunburn(olga, ellie)\nNoticeable(angelico)\nCosset(angelico, ellie)\nforall x (Cosset(x, ellie) and Routine(ellie) -> Pull(ellie, olga))\nforall x (Cosset(x, henrique) and Pull(henrique, ellie) -> Pull(ellie, olga))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Sunburn(x, angelico))\nPull(henrique, olga) -> not Cosset(henrique, olga)\nforall x (Pull(x, angelico) -> Pull(x, ellie))\nforall x (Routine(x) and Pull(x, olga) -> Eastmost(olga))\nnot Assamese(angelico) -> Pull(angelico, ellie)\nforall x (Sunburn(x, ellie) -> not Cosset(ellie, olga))\n\nNoticeable(ellie)\n\nNoticeable(ellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The ruella chivvy the doria. The ruella is stooping. The ruella yellow the allene. The ruella yellow the doria. The ruella does not visit the allene. The allene bone the tierney. The tierney chivvy the allene. The tierney does not eat the doria. The tierney is ebon. The tierney bone the ruella. The doria is steady. The doria yellow the ruella. If something yellow the ruella and the ruella is stooping then the ruella chivvy the tierney. If something yellow the allene and the allene chivvy the ruella then the ruella chivvy the tierney. If something is prewar then it bone the doria. If the allene chivvy the tierney then the allene does not see the tierney. If something chivvy the doria then it chivvy the ruella. If something is stooping and it chivvy the tierney then the tierney is prewar. If the doria is not squalling then the doria chivvy the ruella. If something bone the ruella then the ruella does not see the tierney. The doria is not stooping.", "logic": "\nChivvy(ruella, doria)\nStooping(ruella)\nYellow(ruella, allene)\nYellow(ruella, doria)\nnot Bone(ruella, allene)\nBone(allene, tierney)\nChivvy(tierney, allene)\nnot Chivvy(tierney, doria)\nEbon(tierney)\nBone(tierney, ruella)\nSteady(doria)\nYellow(doria, ruella)\nforall x (Yellow(x, ruella) and Stooping(ruella) -> Chivvy(ruella, tierney))\nforall x (Yellow(x, allene) and Chivvy(allene, ruella) -> Chivvy(ruella, tierney))\nforall x (Prewar(x) -> Bone(x, doria))\nChivvy(allene, tierney) -> not Yellow(allene, tierney)\nforall x (Chivvy(x, doria) -> Chivvy(x, ruella))\nforall x (Stooping(x) and Chivvy(x, tierney) -> Prewar(tierney))\nnot Squalling(doria) -> Chivvy(doria, ruella)\nforall x (Bone(x, ruella) -> not Yellow(ruella, tierney))\n\nnot Stooping(doria)\n\nnot Stooping(doria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The quiggly sling the angy. The quiggly is necked. The quiggly rouse the celisse. The quiggly rouse the angy. The quiggly does not visit the celisse. The celisse levant the lyndsey. The lyndsey sling the celisse. The lyndsey does not eat the angy. The lyndsey is cowardly. The lyndsey levant the quiggly. The angy is woolen. The angy rouse the quiggly. If something rouse the quiggly and the quiggly is necked then the quiggly sling the lyndsey. If something rouse the celisse and the celisse sling the quiggly then the quiggly sling the lyndsey. If something is aoristic then it levant the angy. If the celisse sling the lyndsey then the celisse does not see the lyndsey. If something sling the angy then it sling the quiggly. If something is necked and it sling the lyndsey then the lyndsey is aoristic. If the angy is not suboceanic then the angy sling the quiggly. If something levant the quiggly then the quiggly does not see the lyndsey. The quiggly levant the quiggly.", "logic": "\nSling(quiggly, angy)\nNecked(quiggly)\nRouse(quiggly, celisse)\nRouse(quiggly, angy)\nnot Levant(quiggly, celisse)\nLevant(celisse, lyndsey)\nSling(lyndsey, celisse)\nnot Sling(lyndsey, angy)\nCowardly(lyndsey)\nLevant(lyndsey, quiggly)\nWoolen(angy)\nRouse(angy, quiggly)\nforall x (Rouse(x, quiggly) and Necked(quiggly) -> Sling(quiggly, lyndsey))\nforall x (Rouse(x, celisse) and Sling(celisse, quiggly) -> Sling(quiggly, lyndsey))\nforall x (Aoristic(x) -> Levant(x, angy))\nSling(celisse, lyndsey) -> not Rouse(celisse, lyndsey)\nforall x (Sling(x, angy) -> Sling(x, quiggly))\nforall x (Necked(x) and Sling(x, lyndsey) -> Aoristic(lyndsey))\nnot Suboceanic(angy) -> Sling(angy, quiggly)\nforall x (Levant(x, quiggly) -> not Rouse(quiggly, lyndsey))\n\nLevant(quiggly, quiggly)\n\nLevant(quiggly, quiggly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "Thad is verifiable. Thad is shuddery. Thad is excretory. Thad is wearying. Thad is wide. Lissa is verifiable. Lissa is shuddery. Lissa is excretory. Lissa is deuced. Lissa is wearying. Lissa is damning. Lissa is wide. Almeria is shuddery. Almeria is excretory. Almeria is deuced. All wearying, deuced things are verifiable. All damning, deuced things are excretory. Round things are deuced. If something is wearying and deuced then it is wide. Young, wearying things are shuddery. All damning things are deuced. Young, shuddery things are wearying. If Almeria is shuddery and Almeria is excretory then Almeria is wide. Thad is verifiable.", "logic": "\nVerifiable(thad)\nShuddery(thad)\nExcretory(thad)\nWearying(thad)\nWide(thad)\nVerifiable(lissa)\nShuddery(lissa)\nExcretory(lissa)\nDeuced(lissa)\nWearying(lissa)\nDamning(lissa)\nWide(lissa)\nShuddery(almeria)\nExcretory(almeria)\nDeuced(almeria)\nforall x (Wearying(x) and Deuced(x) -> Verifiable(x))\nforall x (Damning(x) and Deuced(x) -> Excretory(x))\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Wearying(x) and Deuced(x) -> Wide(x))\nforall x (Wide(x) and Wearying(x) -> Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Wide(x) and Shuddery(x) -> Wearying(x))\nShuddery(almeria) and Excretory(almeria) -> Wide(almeria)\n\nVerifiable(thad)\n\ntherefore Verifiable(thad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Rachelle is tonal. Rachelle is pathogenic. Rachelle is approving. Rachelle is cocksure. Rachelle is curvey. Endora is tonal. Endora is pathogenic. Endora is approving. Endora is irate. Endora is cocksure. Endora is settled. Endora is curvey. Gino is pathogenic. Gino is approving. Gino is irate. All cocksure, irate things are tonal. All settled, irate things are approving. Round things are irate. If something is cocksure and irate then it is curvey. Young, cocksure things are pathogenic. All settled things are irate. Young, pathogenic things are cocksure. If Gino is pathogenic and Gino is approving then Gino is curvey. Endora is not cocksure.", "logic": "\nTonal(rachelle)\nPathogenic(rachelle)\nApproving(rachelle)\nCocksure(rachelle)\nCurvey(rachelle)\nTonal(endora)\nPathogenic(endora)\nApproving(endora)\nIrate(endora)\nCocksure(endora)\nSettled(endora)\nCurvey(endora)\nPathogenic(gino)\nApproving(gino)\nIrate(gino)\nforall x (Cocksure(x) and Irate(x) -> Tonal(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) and Irate(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Irate(x))\nforall x (Cocksure(x) and Irate(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) and Cocksure(x) -> Pathogenic(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Irate(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) and Pathogenic(x) -> Cocksure(x))\nPathogenic(gino) and Approving(gino) -> Curvey(gino)\n\nnot Cocksure(endora)\n\ntherefore Cocksure(endora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Rodrigo is systolic. Rodrigo is unusual. Rodrigo is unstable. Rodrigo is bumpy. Rodrigo is shallow. Hedi is systolic. Hedi is unusual. Hedi is unstable. Hedi is suchlike. Hedi is bumpy. Hedi is tartarean. Hedi is shallow. Cecily is unusual. Cecily is unstable. Cecily is suchlike. All bumpy, suchlike things are systolic. All tartarean, suchlike things are unstable. Round things are suchlike. If something is bumpy and suchlike then it is shallow. Young, bumpy things are unusual. All tartarean things are suchlike. Young, unusual things are bumpy. If Cecily is unusual and Cecily is unstable then Cecily is shallow. Cecily is shallow.", "logic": "\nSystolic(rodrigo)\nUnusual(rodrigo)\nUnstable(rodrigo)\nBumpy(rodrigo)\nShallow(rodrigo)\nSystolic(hedi)\nUnusual(hedi)\nUnstable(hedi)\nSuchlike(hedi)\nBumpy(hedi)\nTartarean(hedi)\nShallow(hedi)\nUnusual(cecily)\nUnstable(cecily)\nSuchlike(cecily)\nforall x (Bumpy(x) and Suchlike(x) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) and Suchlike(x) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) -> Suchlike(x))\nforall x (Bumpy(x) and Suchlike(x) -> Shallow(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Bumpy(x) -> Unusual(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) -> Suchlike(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Unusual(x) -> Bumpy(x))\nUnusual(cecily) and Unstable(cecily) -> Shallow(cecily)\n\nShallow(cecily)\n\nUnusual(cecily) and Unstable(cecily) and Unusual(cecily) and Unstable(cecily) -> Shallow(cecily) -> therefore Shallow(cecily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Shaylyn is equipotent. Shaylyn is octagonal. Shaylyn is lxxi. Shaylyn is hermitic. Shaylyn is shopworn. Heather is equipotent. Heather is octagonal. Heather is lxxi. Heather is innoxious. Heather is hermitic. Heather is scrimy. Heather is shopworn. Hollyanne is octagonal. Hollyanne is lxxi. Hollyanne is innoxious. All hermitic, innoxious things are equipotent. All scrimy, innoxious things are lxxi. Round things are innoxious. If something is hermitic and innoxious then it is shopworn. Young, hermitic things are octagonal. All scrimy things are innoxious. Young, octagonal things are hermitic. If Hollyanne is octagonal and Hollyanne is lxxi then Hollyanne is shopworn. Hollyanne is not shopworn.", "logic": "\nEquipotent(shaylyn)\nOctagonal(shaylyn)\nLxxi(shaylyn)\nHermitic(shaylyn)\nShopworn(shaylyn)\nEquipotent(heather)\nOctagonal(heather)\nLxxi(heather)\nInnoxious(heather)\nHermitic(heather)\nScrimy(heather)\nShopworn(heather)\nOctagonal(hollyanne)\nLxxi(hollyanne)\nInnoxious(hollyanne)\nforall x (Hermitic(x) and Innoxious(x) -> Equipotent(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) and Innoxious(x) -> Lxxi(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) -> Innoxious(x))\nforall x (Hermitic(x) and Innoxious(x) -> Shopworn(x))\nforall x (Shopworn(x) and Hermitic(x) -> Octagonal(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) -> Innoxious(x))\nforall x (Shopworn(x) and Octagonal(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nOctagonal(hollyanne) and Lxxi(hollyanne) -> Shopworn(hollyanne)\n\nnot Shopworn(hollyanne)\n\nOctagonal(hollyanne) and Lxxi(hollyanne) and Octagonal(hollyanne) and Lxxi(hollyanne) -> Shopworn(hollyanne) -> therefore Shopworn(hollyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Karia is jaggy. Karia is snazzy. Karia is norse. Karia is faltering. Karia is sabahan. Fonz is jaggy. Fonz is snazzy. Fonz is norse. Fonz is fogyish. Fonz is faltering. Fonz is stuck. Fonz is sabahan. Kip is snazzy. Kip is norse. Kip is fogyish. All faltering, fogyish things are jaggy. All stuck, fogyish things are norse. Round things are fogyish. If something is faltering and fogyish then it is sabahan. Young, faltering things are snazzy. All stuck things are fogyish. Young, snazzy things are faltering. If Kip is snazzy and Kip is norse then Kip is sabahan. Kip is faltering.", "logic": "\nJaggy(karia)\nSnazzy(karia)\nNorse(karia)\nFaltering(karia)\nSabahan(karia)\nJaggy(fonz)\nSnazzy(fonz)\nNorse(fonz)\nFogyish(fonz)\nFaltering(fonz)\nStuck(fonz)\nSabahan(fonz)\nSnazzy(kip)\nNorse(kip)\nFogyish(kip)\nforall x (Faltering(x) and Fogyish(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nforall x (Stuck(x) and Fogyish(x) -> Norse(x))\nforall x (Stuck(x) -> Fogyish(x))\nforall x (Faltering(x) and Fogyish(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) and Faltering(x) -> Snazzy(x))\nforall x (Stuck(x) -> Fogyish(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) and Snazzy(x) -> Faltering(x))\nSnazzy(kip) and Norse(kip) -> Sabahan(kip)\n\nFaltering(kip)\n\nSnazzy(kip) and Norse(kip) and Snazzy(kip) and Norse(kip) -> Sabahan(kip) -> therefore Sabahan(kip) Sabahan(kip) and Snazzy(kip) and forall x (Sabahan(x) and Snazzy(x) -> Faltering(x)) -> therefore Faltering(kip)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Enoch is semestral. Enoch is falcate. Enoch is pistillate. Enoch is stemless. Enoch is unfertile. Helsa is semestral. Helsa is falcate. Helsa is pistillate. Helsa is exploded. Helsa is stemless. Helsa is suspect. Helsa is unfertile. Gera is falcate. Gera is pistillate. Gera is exploded. All stemless, exploded things are semestral. All suspect, exploded things are pistillate. Round things are exploded. If something is stemless and exploded then it is unfertile. Young, stemless things are falcate. All suspect things are exploded. Young, falcate things are stemless. If Gera is falcate and Gera is pistillate then Gera is unfertile. Gera is not stemless.", "logic": "\nSemestral(enoch)\nFalcate(enoch)\nPistillate(enoch)\nStemless(enoch)\nUnfertile(enoch)\nSemestral(helsa)\nFalcate(helsa)\nPistillate(helsa)\nExploded(helsa)\nStemless(helsa)\nSuspect(helsa)\nUnfertile(helsa)\nFalcate(gera)\nPistillate(gera)\nExploded(gera)\nforall x (Stemless(x) and Exploded(x) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x) and Exploded(x) -> Pistillate(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Stemless(x) and Exploded(x) -> Unfertile(x))\nforall x (Unfertile(x) and Stemless(x) -> Falcate(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Unfertile(x) and Falcate(x) -> Stemless(x))\nFalcate(gera) and Pistillate(gera) -> Unfertile(gera)\n\nnot Stemless(gera)\n\nFalcate(gera) and Pistillate(gera) and Falcate(gera) and Pistillate(gera) -> Unfertile(gera) -> therefore Unfertile(gera) Unfertile(gera) and Falcate(gera) and forall x (Unfertile(x) and Falcate(x) -> Stemless(x)) -> therefore Stemless(gera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Robinett is xerophytic. Robinett is unfit. Robinett is beat. Robinett is disjunct. Robinett is accretive. Trenton is xerophytic. Trenton is unfit. Trenton is beat. Trenton is advertent. Trenton is disjunct. Trenton is endangered. Trenton is accretive. Brodie is unfit. Brodie is beat. Brodie is advertent. All disjunct, advertent things are xerophytic. All endangered, advertent things are beat. Round things are advertent. If something is disjunct and advertent then it is accretive. Young, disjunct things are unfit. All endangered things are advertent. Young, unfit things are disjunct. If Brodie is unfit and Brodie is beat then Brodie is accretive. Brodie is xerophytic.", "logic": "\nXerophytic(robinett)\nUnfit(robinett)\nBeat(robinett)\nDisjunct(robinett)\nAccretive(robinett)\nXerophytic(trenton)\nUnfit(trenton)\nBeat(trenton)\nAdvertent(trenton)\nDisjunct(trenton)\nEndangered(trenton)\nAccretive(trenton)\nUnfit(brodie)\nBeat(brodie)\nAdvertent(brodie)\nforall x (Disjunct(x) and Advertent(x) -> Xerophytic(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) and Advertent(x) -> Beat(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Disjunct(x) and Advertent(x) -> Accretive(x))\nforall x (Accretive(x) and Disjunct(x) -> Unfit(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Accretive(x) and Unfit(x) -> Disjunct(x))\nUnfit(brodie) and Beat(brodie) -> Accretive(brodie)\n\nXerophytic(brodie)\n\nUnfit(brodie) and Beat(brodie) and Unfit(brodie) and Beat(brodie) -> Accretive(brodie) -> therefore Accretive(brodie) Accretive(brodie) and Unfit(brodie) and forall x (Accretive(x) and Unfit(x) -> Disjunct(x)) -> therefore Disjunct(brodie) Disjunct(brodie) and Advertent(brodie) and forall x (Disjunct(x) and Advertent(x) -> Xerophytic(x)) -> therefore Xerophytic(brodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Vanya is female. Vanya is reflective. Vanya is anglican. Vanya is perturbing. Vanya is phonemic. Josi is female. Josi is reflective. Josi is anglican. Josi is rousing. Josi is perturbing. Josi is hunted. Josi is phonemic. Saree is reflective. Saree is anglican. Saree is rousing. All perturbing, rousing things are female. All hunted, rousing things are anglican. Round things are rousing. If something is perturbing and rousing then it is phonemic. Young, perturbing things are reflective. All hunted things are rousing. Young, reflective things are perturbing. If Saree is reflective and Saree is anglican then Saree is phonemic. Saree is not female.", "logic": "\nFemale(vanya)\nReflective(vanya)\nAnglican(vanya)\nPerturbing(vanya)\nPhonemic(vanya)\nFemale(josi)\nReflective(josi)\nAnglican(josi)\nRousing(josi)\nPerturbing(josi)\nHunted(josi)\nPhonemic(josi)\nReflective(saree)\nAnglican(saree)\nRousing(saree)\nforall x (Perturbing(x) and Rousing(x) -> Female(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) and Rousing(x) -> Anglican(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) and Rousing(x) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Phonemic(x) and Perturbing(x) -> Reflective(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Phonemic(x) and Reflective(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nReflective(saree) and Anglican(saree) -> Phonemic(saree)\n\nnot Female(saree)\n\nReflective(saree) and Anglican(saree) and Reflective(saree) and Anglican(saree) -> Phonemic(saree) -> therefore Phonemic(saree) Phonemic(saree) and Reflective(saree) and forall x (Phonemic(x) and Reflective(x) -> Perturbing(x)) -> therefore Perturbing(saree) Perturbing(saree) and Rousing(saree) and forall x (Perturbing(x) and Rousing(x) -> Female(x)) -> therefore Female(saree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Juergen is sexist. Juergen is xxxiii. Juergen is lentiform. Juergen is repelling. Juergen is beguiled. Gussie is sexist. Gussie is xxxiii. Gussie is lentiform. Gussie is avifaunal. Gussie is repelling. Gussie is muhammadan. Gussie is beguiled. Philipa is xxxiii. Philipa is lentiform. Philipa is avifaunal. All repelling, avifaunal things are sexist. All muhammadan, avifaunal things are lentiform. Round things are avifaunal. If something is repelling and avifaunal then it is beguiled. Young, repelling things are xxxiii. All muhammadan things are avifaunal. Young, xxxiii things are repelling. If Philipa is xxxiii and Philipa is lentiform then Philipa is beguiled. Juergen is not avifaunal.", "logic": "\nSexist(juergen)\nXxxiii(juergen)\nLentiform(juergen)\nRepelling(juergen)\nBeguiled(juergen)\nSexist(gussie)\nXxxiii(gussie)\nLentiform(gussie)\nAvifaunal(gussie)\nRepelling(gussie)\nMuhammadan(gussie)\nBeguiled(gussie)\nXxxiii(philipa)\nLentiform(philipa)\nAvifaunal(philipa)\nforall x (Repelling(x) and Avifaunal(x) -> Sexist(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) and Avifaunal(x) -> Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\nforall x (Repelling(x) and Avifaunal(x) -> Beguiled(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) and Repelling(x) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) and Xxxiii(x) -> Repelling(x))\nXxxiii(philipa) and Lentiform(philipa) -> Beguiled(philipa)\n\nnot Avifaunal(juergen)\n\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) -> Avifaunal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Cheryl is dissected. Cheryl is croupy. Cheryl is iatrogenic. Cheryl is ringed. Cheryl is pyramidal. Karlotta is dissected. Karlotta is croupy. Karlotta is iatrogenic. Karlotta is defendable. Karlotta is ringed. Karlotta is shrimpy. Karlotta is pyramidal. Maire is croupy. Maire is iatrogenic. Maire is defendable. All ringed, defendable things are dissected. All shrimpy, defendable things are iatrogenic. Round things are defendable. If something is ringed and defendable then it is pyramidal. Young, ringed things are croupy. All shrimpy things are defendable. Young, croupy things are ringed. If Maire is croupy and Maire is iatrogenic then Maire is pyramidal. Cheryl is shrimpy.", "logic": "\nDissected(cheryl)\nCroupy(cheryl)\nIatrogenic(cheryl)\nRinged(cheryl)\nPyramidal(cheryl)\nDissected(karlotta)\nCroupy(karlotta)\nIatrogenic(karlotta)\nDefendable(karlotta)\nRinged(karlotta)\nShrimpy(karlotta)\nPyramidal(karlotta)\nCroupy(maire)\nIatrogenic(maire)\nDefendable(maire)\nforall x (Ringed(x) and Defendable(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) and Defendable(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Ringed(x) and Defendable(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) and Ringed(x) -> Croupy(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) and Croupy(x) -> Ringed(x))\nCroupy(maire) and Iatrogenic(maire) -> Pyramidal(maire)\n\nShrimpy(cheryl)\n\nShrimpy(cheryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "The liora swoop the mildrid. The liora is undying. The liora is ramose. The liora is monogamous. The liora is umbellar. The liora is gloveless. The liora appraise the mildrid. The liora alter the mildrid. The mildrid swoop the liora. The mildrid is undying. The mildrid is ramose. The mildrid is monogamous. The mildrid is umbellar. The mildrid is gloveless. The mildrid appraise the liora. The mildrid alter the liora. If something swoop the liora and it swoop the mildrid then it alter the mildrid. If something alter the mildrid then it appraise the mildrid. If something is umbellar then it appraise the liora. If something alter the liora then the liora is gloveless. If something is undying then it swoop the mildrid. If the liora alter the mildrid and the mildrid is ramose then the liora appraise the mildrid. The mildrid appraise the liora.", "logic": "\nSwoop(liora, mildrid)\nUndying(liora)\nRamose(liora)\nMonogamous(liora)\nUmbellar(liora)\nGloveless(liora)\nAppraise(liora, mildrid)\nAlter(liora, mildrid)\nSwoop(mildrid, liora)\nUndying(mildrid)\nRamose(mildrid)\nMonogamous(mildrid)\nUmbellar(mildrid)\nGloveless(mildrid)\nAppraise(mildrid, liora)\nAlter(mildrid, liora)\nforall x (Swoop(x, liora) and Swoop(x, mildrid) -> Alter(x, mildrid))\nforall x (Alter(x, mildrid) -> Appraise(x, mildrid))\nforall x (Umbellar(x) -> Appraise(x, liora))\nforall x (Alter(x, liora) -> Gloveless(liora))\nforall x (Undying(x) -> Swoop(x, mildrid))\nAlter(liora, mildrid) and Ramose(mildrid) -> Appraise(liora, mildrid)\n\nAppraise(mildrid, liora)\n\ntherefore Appraise(mildrid, liora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The walden keep the forbes. The walden is digestible. The walden is arciform. The walden is clattery. The walden is springless. The walden is chancrous. The walden clinker the forbes. The walden partake the forbes. The forbes keep the walden. The forbes is digestible. The forbes is arciform. The forbes is clattery. The forbes is springless. The forbes is chancrous. The forbes clinker the walden. The forbes partake the walden. If something keep the walden and it keep the forbes then it partake the forbes. If something partake the forbes then it clinker the forbes. If something is springless then it clinker the walden. If something partake the walden then the walden is chancrous. If something is digestible then it keep the forbes. If the walden partake the forbes and the forbes is arciform then the walden clinker the forbes. The walden does not need the forbes.", "logic": "\nKeep(walden, forbes)\nDigestible(walden)\nArciform(walden)\nClattery(walden)\nSpringless(walden)\nChancrous(walden)\nClinker(walden, forbes)\nPartake(walden, forbes)\nKeep(forbes, walden)\nDigestible(forbes)\nArciform(forbes)\nClattery(forbes)\nSpringless(forbes)\nChancrous(forbes)\nClinker(forbes, walden)\nPartake(forbes, walden)\nforall x (Keep(x, walden) and Keep(x, forbes) -> Partake(x, forbes))\nforall x (Partake(x, forbes) -> Clinker(x, forbes))\nforall x (Springless(x) -> Clinker(x, walden))\nforall x (Partake(x, walden) -> Chancrous(walden))\nforall x (Digestible(x) -> Keep(x, forbes))\nPartake(walden, forbes) and Arciform(forbes) -> Clinker(walden, forbes)\n\nnot Clinker(walden, forbes)\n\ntherefore Clinker(walden, forbes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The etti capsize the silvie. The etti is rivalrous. The etti is struck. The etti is commercial. The etti is decorative. The etti is brooding. The etti enthuse the silvie. The etti turn the silvie. The silvie capsize the etti. The silvie is rivalrous. The silvie is struck. The silvie is commercial. The silvie is decorative. The silvie is brooding. The silvie enthuse the etti. The silvie turn the etti. If something capsize the etti and it capsize the silvie then it turn the silvie. If something turn the silvie then it enthuse the silvie. If something is decorative then it enthuse the etti. If something turn the etti then the etti is brooding. If something is rivalrous then it capsize the silvie. If the etti turn the silvie and the silvie is struck then the etti enthuse the silvie. The etti enthuse the etti.", "logic": "\nCapsize(etti, silvie)\nRivalrous(etti)\nStruck(etti)\nCommercial(etti)\nDecorative(etti)\nBrooding(etti)\nEnthuse(etti, silvie)\nTurn(etti, silvie)\nCapsize(silvie, etti)\nRivalrous(silvie)\nStruck(silvie)\nCommercial(silvie)\nDecorative(silvie)\nBrooding(silvie)\nEnthuse(silvie, etti)\nTurn(silvie, etti)\nforall x (Capsize(x, etti) and Capsize(x, silvie) -> Turn(x, silvie))\nforall x (Turn(x, silvie) -> Enthuse(x, silvie))\nforall x (Decorative(x) -> Enthuse(x, etti))\nforall x (Turn(x, etti) -> Brooding(etti))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Capsize(x, silvie))\nTurn(etti, silvie) and Struck(silvie) -> Enthuse(etti, silvie)\n\nEnthuse(etti, etti)\n\nDecorative(etti) and forall x (Decorative(x) -> Enthuse(x, etti)) -> therefore Enthuse(etti, etti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The hailey object the zsazsa. The hailey is enolic. The hailey is slender. The hailey is chasidic. The hailey is shoeless. The hailey is stainless. The hailey vitalise the zsazsa. The hailey unsnarl the zsazsa. The zsazsa object the hailey. The zsazsa is enolic. The zsazsa is slender. The zsazsa is chasidic. The zsazsa is shoeless. The zsazsa is stainless. The zsazsa vitalise the hailey. The zsazsa unsnarl the hailey. If something object the hailey and it object the zsazsa then it unsnarl the zsazsa. If something unsnarl the zsazsa then it vitalise the zsazsa. If something is shoeless then it vitalise the hailey. If something unsnarl the hailey then the hailey is stainless. If something is enolic then it object the zsazsa. If the hailey unsnarl the zsazsa and the zsazsa is slender then the hailey vitalise the zsazsa. The hailey does not need the hailey.", "logic": "\nObject(hailey, zsazsa)\nEnolic(hailey)\nSlender(hailey)\nChasidic(hailey)\nShoeless(hailey)\nStainless(hailey)\nVitalise(hailey, zsazsa)\nUnsnarl(hailey, zsazsa)\nObject(zsazsa, hailey)\nEnolic(zsazsa)\nSlender(zsazsa)\nChasidic(zsazsa)\nShoeless(zsazsa)\nStainless(zsazsa)\nVitalise(zsazsa, hailey)\nUnsnarl(zsazsa, hailey)\nforall x (Object(x, hailey) and Object(x, zsazsa) -> Unsnarl(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, zsazsa) -> Vitalise(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Shoeless(x) -> Vitalise(x, hailey))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, hailey) -> Stainless(hailey))\nforall x (Enolic(x) -> Object(x, zsazsa))\nUnsnarl(hailey, zsazsa) and Slender(zsazsa) -> Vitalise(hailey, zsazsa)\n\nnot Vitalise(hailey, hailey)\n\nShoeless(hailey) and forall x (Shoeless(x) -> Vitalise(x, hailey)) -> therefore Vitalise(hailey, hailey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The barnebas steer the delila. The barnebas is bottom. The barnebas is brunette. The barnebas is homely. The barnebas is branchy. The barnebas is rushy. The barnebas blemish the delila. The barnebas specify the delila. The delila steer the barnebas. The delila is bottom. The delila is brunette. The delila is homely. The delila is branchy. The delila is rushy. The delila blemish the barnebas. The delila specify the barnebas. If something steer the barnebas and it steer the delila then it specify the delila. If something specify the delila then it blemish the delila. If something is branchy then it blemish the barnebas. If something specify the barnebas then the barnebas is rushy. If something is bottom then it steer the delila. If the barnebas specify the delila and the delila is brunette then the barnebas blemish the delila. The delila specify the delila.", "logic": "\nSteer(barnebas, delila)\nBottom(barnebas)\nBrunette(barnebas)\nHomely(barnebas)\nBranchy(barnebas)\nRushy(barnebas)\nBlemish(barnebas, delila)\nSpecify(barnebas, delila)\nSteer(delila, barnebas)\nBottom(delila)\nBrunette(delila)\nHomely(delila)\nBranchy(delila)\nRushy(delila)\nBlemish(delila, barnebas)\nSpecify(delila, barnebas)\nforall x (Steer(x, barnebas) and Steer(x, delila) -> Specify(x, delila))\nforall x (Specify(x, delila) -> Blemish(x, delila))\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Blemish(x, barnebas))\nforall x (Specify(x, barnebas) -> Rushy(barnebas))\nforall x (Bottom(x) -> Steer(x, delila))\nSpecify(barnebas, delila) and Brunette(delila) -> Blemish(barnebas, delila)\n\nSpecify(delila, delila)\n\nBottom(delila) and forall x (Bottom(x) -> Steer(x, delila)) -> therefore Steer(delila, delila) Steer(delila, barnebas) and Steer(delila, delila) and forall x (Steer(x, barnebas) and Steer(x, delila) -> Specify(x, delila)) -> therefore Specify(delila, delila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The bharat stopple the germain. The bharat is plumate. The bharat is torrential. The bharat is adrenergic. The bharat is cyanophyte. The bharat is much. The bharat syllogise the germain. The bharat clout the germain. The germain stopple the bharat. The germain is plumate. The germain is torrential. The germain is adrenergic. The germain is cyanophyte. The germain is much. The germain syllogise the bharat. The germain clout the bharat. If something stopple the bharat and it stopple the germain then it clout the germain. If something clout the germain then it syllogise the germain. If something is cyanophyte then it syllogise the bharat. If something clout the bharat then the bharat is much. If something is plumate then it stopple the germain. If the bharat clout the germain and the germain is torrential then the bharat syllogise the germain. The germain does not see the germain.", "logic": "\nStopple(bharat, germain)\nPlumate(bharat)\nTorrential(bharat)\nAdrenergic(bharat)\nCyanophyte(bharat)\nMuch(bharat)\nSyllogise(bharat, germain)\nClout(bharat, germain)\nStopple(germain, bharat)\nPlumate(germain)\nTorrential(germain)\nAdrenergic(germain)\nCyanophyte(germain)\nMuch(germain)\nSyllogise(germain, bharat)\nClout(germain, bharat)\nforall x (Stopple(x, bharat) and Stopple(x, germain) -> Clout(x, germain))\nforall x (Clout(x, germain) -> Syllogise(x, germain))\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) -> Syllogise(x, bharat))\nforall x (Clout(x, bharat) -> Much(bharat))\nforall x (Plumate(x) -> Stopple(x, germain))\nClout(bharat, germain) and Torrential(germain) -> Syllogise(bharat, germain)\n\nnot Clout(germain, germain)\n\nPlumate(germain) and forall x (Plumate(x) -> Stopple(x, germain)) -> therefore Stopple(germain, germain) Stopple(germain, bharat) and Stopple(germain, germain) and forall x (Stopple(x, bharat) and Stopple(x, germain) -> Clout(x, germain)) -> therefore Clout(germain, germain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The webb seesaw the beverlie. The webb is imperative. The webb is unshakable. The webb is aliquot. The webb is anterior. The webb is baptized. The webb caterwaul the beverlie. The webb narcotise the beverlie. The beverlie seesaw the webb. The beverlie is imperative. The beverlie is unshakable. The beverlie is aliquot. The beverlie is anterior. The beverlie is baptized. The beverlie caterwaul the webb. The beverlie narcotise the webb. If something seesaw the webb and it seesaw the beverlie then it narcotise the beverlie. If something narcotise the beverlie then it caterwaul the beverlie. If something is anterior then it caterwaul the webb. If something narcotise the webb then the webb is baptized. If something is imperative then it seesaw the beverlie. If the webb narcotise the beverlie and the beverlie is unshakable then the webb caterwaul the beverlie. The beverlie caterwaul the beverlie.", "logic": "\nSeesaw(webb, beverlie)\nImperative(webb)\nUnshakable(webb)\nAliquot(webb)\nAnterior(webb)\nBaptized(webb)\nCaterwaul(webb, beverlie)\nNarcotise(webb, beverlie)\nSeesaw(beverlie, webb)\nImperative(beverlie)\nUnshakable(beverlie)\nAliquot(beverlie)\nAnterior(beverlie)\nBaptized(beverlie)\nCaterwaul(beverlie, webb)\nNarcotise(beverlie, webb)\nforall x (Seesaw(x, webb) and Seesaw(x, beverlie) -> Narcotise(x, beverlie))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, beverlie) -> Caterwaul(x, beverlie))\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Caterwaul(x, webb))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, webb) -> Baptized(webb))\nforall x (Imperative(x) -> Seesaw(x, beverlie))\nNarcotise(webb, beverlie) and Unshakable(beverlie) -> Caterwaul(webb, beverlie)\n\nCaterwaul(beverlie, beverlie)\n\nImperative(beverlie) and forall x (Imperative(x) -> Seesaw(x, beverlie)) -> therefore Seesaw(beverlie, beverlie) Seesaw(beverlie, webb) and Seesaw(beverlie, beverlie) and forall x (Seesaw(x, webb) and Seesaw(x, beverlie) -> Narcotise(x, beverlie)) -> therefore Narcotise(beverlie, beverlie) Narcotise(beverlie, beverlie) and forall x (Narcotise(x, beverlie) -> Caterwaul(x, beverlie)) -> therefore Caterwaul(beverlie, beverlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The nonna date the valerie. The nonna is homeless. The nonna is speedy. The nonna is addlepated. The nonna is waking. The nonna is pinioned. The nonna arbitrage the valerie. The nonna thrust the valerie. The valerie date the nonna. The valerie is homeless. The valerie is speedy. The valerie is addlepated. The valerie is waking. The valerie is pinioned. The valerie arbitrage the nonna. The valerie thrust the nonna. If something date the nonna and it date the valerie then it thrust the valerie. If something thrust the valerie then it arbitrage the valerie. If something is waking then it arbitrage the nonna. If something thrust the nonna then the nonna is pinioned. If something is homeless then it date the valerie. If the nonna thrust the valerie and the valerie is speedy then the nonna arbitrage the valerie. The valerie does not need the valerie.", "logic": "\nDate(nonna, valerie)\nHomeless(nonna)\nSpeedy(nonna)\nAddlepated(nonna)\nWaking(nonna)\nPinioned(nonna)\nArbitrage(nonna, valerie)\nThrust(nonna, valerie)\nDate(valerie, nonna)\nHomeless(valerie)\nSpeedy(valerie)\nAddlepated(valerie)\nWaking(valerie)\nPinioned(valerie)\nArbitrage(valerie, nonna)\nThrust(valerie, nonna)\nforall x (Date(x, nonna) and Date(x, valerie) -> Thrust(x, valerie))\nforall x (Thrust(x, valerie) -> Arbitrage(x, valerie))\nforall x (Waking(x) -> Arbitrage(x, nonna))\nforall x (Thrust(x, nonna) -> Pinioned(nonna))\nforall x (Homeless(x) -> Date(x, valerie))\nThrust(nonna, valerie) and Speedy(valerie) -> Arbitrage(nonna, valerie)\n\nnot Arbitrage(valerie, valerie)\n\nHomeless(valerie) and forall x (Homeless(x) -> Date(x, valerie)) -> therefore Date(valerie, valerie) Date(valerie, nonna) and Date(valerie, valerie) and forall x (Date(x, nonna) and Date(x, valerie) -> Thrust(x, valerie)) -> therefore Thrust(valerie, valerie) Thrust(valerie, valerie) and forall x (Thrust(x, valerie) -> Arbitrage(x, valerie)) -> therefore Arbitrage(valerie, valerie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The denni sink the dick. The denni is incitive. The denni is apical. The denni is bloody. The denni is unsettled. The denni is bugged. The denni antic the dick. The denni slur the dick. The dick sink the denni. The dick is incitive. The dick is apical. The dick is bloody. The dick is unsettled. The dick is bugged. The dick antic the denni. The dick slur the denni. If something sink the denni and it sink the dick then it slur the dick. If something slur the dick then it antic the dick. If something is unsettled then it antic the denni. If something slur the denni then the denni is bugged. If something is incitive then it sink the dick. If the denni slur the dick and the dick is apical then the denni antic the dick. The denni does not see the denni.", "logic": "\nSink(denni, dick)\nIncitive(denni)\nApical(denni)\nBloody(denni)\nUnsettled(denni)\nBugged(denni)\nAntic(denni, dick)\nSlur(denni, dick)\nSink(dick, denni)\nIncitive(dick)\nApical(dick)\nBloody(dick)\nUnsettled(dick)\nBugged(dick)\nAntic(dick, denni)\nSlur(dick, denni)\nforall x (Sink(x, denni) and Sink(x, dick) -> Slur(x, dick))\nforall x (Slur(x, dick) -> Antic(x, dick))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) -> Antic(x, denni))\nforall x (Slur(x, denni) -> Bugged(denni))\nforall x (Incitive(x) -> Sink(x, dick))\nSlur(denni, dick) and Apical(dick) -> Antic(denni, dick)\n\nnot Slur(denni, denni)\n\nnot Slur(denni, denni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The elyse palpate the neel. The elyse is catty. The elyse is sanguinary. The elyse is moot. The elyse is thankless. The elyse is stupid. The elyse ripen the neel. The elyse bitch the neel. The neel palpate the elyse. The neel is catty. The neel is sanguinary. The neel is moot. The neel is thankless. The neel is stupid. The neel ripen the elyse. The neel bitch the elyse. If something palpate the elyse and it palpate the neel then it bitch the neel. If something bitch the neel then it ripen the neel. If something is thankless then it ripen the elyse. If something bitch the elyse then the elyse is stupid. If something is catty then it palpate the neel. If the elyse bitch the neel and the neel is sanguinary then the elyse ripen the neel. The elyse palpate the elyse.", "logic": "\nPalpate(elyse, neel)\nCatty(elyse)\nSanguinary(elyse)\nMoot(elyse)\nThankless(elyse)\nStupid(elyse)\nRipen(elyse, neel)\nBitch(elyse, neel)\nPalpate(neel, elyse)\nCatty(neel)\nSanguinary(neel)\nMoot(neel)\nThankless(neel)\nStupid(neel)\nRipen(neel, elyse)\nBitch(neel, elyse)\nforall x (Palpate(x, elyse) and Palpate(x, neel) -> Bitch(x, neel))\nforall x (Bitch(x, neel) -> Ripen(x, neel))\nforall x (Thankless(x) -> Ripen(x, elyse))\nforall x (Bitch(x, elyse) -> Stupid(elyse))\nforall x (Catty(x) -> Palpate(x, neel))\nBitch(elyse, neel) and Sanguinary(neel) -> Ripen(elyse, neel)\n\nPalpate(elyse, elyse)\n\nPalpate(elyse, elyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "Kath is cloistered. Kath is favorable. Kath is hick. If Kath is cloistered and Kath is sapid then Kath is ameban. All hick, favorable things are admired. Nice things are sapid. Kath is hick.", "logic": "\nCloistered(kath)\nFavorable(kath)\nHick(kath)\nCloistered(kath) and Sapid(kath) -> Ameban(kath)\nforall x (Hick(x) and Favorable(x) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) -> Sapid(x))\n\nHick(kath)\n\ntherefore Hick(kath)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Salome is screwy. Salome is impugnable. Salome is monastical. If Salome is screwy and Salome is underage then Salome is paralyzed. All monastical, impugnable things are pictured. Nice things are underage. Salome is not monastical.", "logic": "\nScrewy(salome)\nImpugnable(salome)\nMonastical(salome)\nScrewy(salome) and Underage(salome) -> Paralyzed(salome)\nforall x (Monastical(x) and Impugnable(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Pictured(x) -> Underage(x))\n\nnot Monastical(salome)\n\ntherefore Monastical(salome)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Town is vulnerable. Town is monoclonal. Town is bastardly. If Town is vulnerable and Town is voteless then Town is energetic. All bastardly, monoclonal things are grotty. Nice things are voteless. Town is grotty.", "logic": "\nVulnerable(town)\nMonoclonal(town)\nBastardly(town)\nVulnerable(town) and Voteless(town) -> Energetic(town)\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Monoclonal(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Voteless(x))\n\nGrotty(town)\n\nBastardly(town) and Monoclonal(town) and forall x (Bastardly(x) and Monoclonal(x) -> Grotty(x)) -> therefore Grotty(town)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Cleland is familiar. Cleland is jangling. Cleland is advancing. If Cleland is familiar and Cleland is unpolished then Cleland is varicose. All advancing, jangling things are aphonic. Nice things are unpolished. Cleland is not aphonic.", "logic": "\nFamiliar(cleland)\nJangling(cleland)\nAdvancing(cleland)\nFamiliar(cleland) and Unpolished(cleland) -> Varicose(cleland)\nforall x (Advancing(x) and Jangling(x) -> Aphonic(x))\nforall x (Aphonic(x) -> Unpolished(x))\n\nnot Aphonic(cleland)\n\nAdvancing(cleland) and Jangling(cleland) and forall x (Advancing(x) and Jangling(x) -> Aphonic(x)) -> therefore Aphonic(cleland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Rutledge is coeliac. Rutledge is curled. Rutledge is less. If Rutledge is coeliac and Rutledge is geological then Rutledge is gradable. All less, curled things are tilted. Nice things are geological. Rutledge is geological.", "logic": "\nCoeliac(rutledge)\nCurled(rutledge)\nLess(rutledge)\nCoeliac(rutledge) and Geological(rutledge) -> Gradable(rutledge)\nforall x (Less(x) and Curled(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Geological(x))\n\nGeological(rutledge)\n\nLess(rutledge) and Curled(rutledge) and forall x (Less(x) and Curled(x) -> Tilted(x)) -> therefore Tilted(rutledge) Tilted(rutledge) and forall x (Tilted(x) -> Geological(x)) -> therefore Geological(rutledge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Alpa is crazed. Alpa is swingy. Alpa is noiseless. If Alpa is crazed and Alpa is conjugate then Alpa is straggly. All noiseless, swingy things are unenrgetic. Nice things are conjugate. Alpa is not conjugate.", "logic": "\nCrazed(alpa)\nSwingy(alpa)\nNoiseless(alpa)\nCrazed(alpa) and Conjugate(alpa) -> Straggly(alpa)\nforall x (Noiseless(x) and Swingy(x) -> Unenrgetic(x))\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) -> Conjugate(x))\n\nnot Conjugate(alpa)\n\nNoiseless(alpa) and Swingy(alpa) and forall x (Noiseless(x) and Swingy(x) -> Unenrgetic(x)) -> therefore Unenrgetic(alpa) Unenrgetic(alpa) and forall x (Unenrgetic(x) -> Conjugate(x)) -> therefore Conjugate(alpa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Hermy is decisive. Hermy is unwebbed. Hermy is soppy. If Hermy is decisive and Hermy is accurate then Hermy is maltese. All soppy, unwebbed things are sloshed. Nice things are accurate. Hermy is maltese.", "logic": "\nDecisive(hermy)\nUnwebbed(hermy)\nSoppy(hermy)\nDecisive(hermy) and Accurate(hermy) -> Maltese(hermy)\nforall x (Soppy(x) and Unwebbed(x) -> Sloshed(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Accurate(x))\n\nMaltese(hermy)\n\nSoppy(hermy) and Unwebbed(hermy) and forall x (Soppy(x) and Unwebbed(x) -> Sloshed(x)) -> therefore Sloshed(hermy) Sloshed(hermy) and forall x (Sloshed(x) -> Accurate(x)) -> therefore Accurate(hermy) Decisive(hermy) and Accurate(hermy) and Decisive(hermy) and Accurate(hermy) -> Maltese(hermy) -> therefore Maltese(hermy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Carlina is boastful. Carlina is ignited. Carlina is trite. If Carlina is boastful and Carlina is vulnerable then Carlina is unsold. All trite, ignited things are petalled. Nice things are vulnerable. Carlina is not unsold.", "logic": "\nBoastful(carlina)\nIgnited(carlina)\nTrite(carlina)\nBoastful(carlina) and Vulnerable(carlina) -> Unsold(carlina)\nforall x (Trite(x) and Ignited(x) -> Petalled(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\n\nnot Unsold(carlina)\n\nTrite(carlina) and Ignited(carlina) and forall x (Trite(x) and Ignited(x) -> Petalled(x)) -> therefore Petalled(carlina) Petalled(carlina) and forall x (Petalled(x) -> Vulnerable(x)) -> therefore Vulnerable(carlina) Boastful(carlina) and Vulnerable(carlina) and Boastful(carlina) and Vulnerable(carlina) -> Unsold(carlina) -> therefore Unsold(carlina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Konstanze is wired. Konstanze is not sanctified. Konstanze is idolatrous. If Konstanze is not sanctified then Konstanze is hypodermal. If Konstanze is rawboned and Konstanze is not sanctified then Konstanze is flaming. All sanctified people are rawboned. If someone is hypodermal then they are rawboned. Young, rawboned people are flaming. All trabeate people are not flaming. If Konstanze is not sanctified then Konstanze is idolatrous. If Konstanze is trabeate and Konstanze is not rawboned then Konstanze is idolatrous. Konstanze is wired.", "logic": "\nWired(konstanze)\nnot Sanctified(konstanze)\nIdolatrous(konstanze)\nnot Sanctified(konstanze) -> Hypodermal(konstanze)\nRawboned(konstanze) and not Sanctified(konstanze) -> Flaming(konstanze)\nforall x (Sanctified(x) -> Rawboned(x))\nforall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Rawboned(x))\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) and Rawboned(x) -> Flaming(x))\nforall x (Trabeate(x) -> not Flaming(x))\nnot Sanctified(konstanze) -> Idolatrous(konstanze)\nTrabeate(konstanze) and not Rawboned(konstanze) -> Idolatrous(konstanze)\n\nWired(konstanze)\n\ntherefore Wired(konstanze)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Titos is monoatomic. Titos is not booming. Titos is pomaded. If Titos is not booming then Titos is busted. If Titos is wholemeal and Titos is not booming then Titos is galvanic. All booming people are wholemeal. If someone is busted then they are wholemeal. Young, wholemeal people are galvanic. All gratis people are not galvanic. If Titos is not booming then Titos is pomaded. If Titos is gratis and Titos is not wholemeal then Titos is pomaded. Titos is booming.", "logic": "\nMonoatomic(titos)\nnot Booming(titos)\nPomaded(titos)\nnot Booming(titos) -> Busted(titos)\nWholemeal(titos) and not Booming(titos) -> Galvanic(titos)\nforall x (Booming(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Busted(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) and Wholemeal(x) -> Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> not Galvanic(x))\nnot Booming(titos) -> Pomaded(titos)\nGratis(titos) and not Wholemeal(titos) -> Pomaded(titos)\n\nBooming(titos)\n\ntherefore not Booming(titos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Wendie is pointed. Wendie is not senegalese. Wendie is inanimate. If Wendie is not senegalese then Wendie is sanguine. If Wendie is teeny and Wendie is not senegalese then Wendie is occupied. All senegalese people are teeny. If someone is sanguine then they are teeny. Young, teeny people are occupied. All unsatiable people are not occupied. If Wendie is not senegalese then Wendie is inanimate. If Wendie is unsatiable and Wendie is not teeny then Wendie is inanimate. Wendie is sanguine.", "logic": "\nPointed(wendie)\nnot Senegalese(wendie)\nInanimate(wendie)\nnot Senegalese(wendie) -> Sanguine(wendie)\nTeeny(wendie) and not Senegalese(wendie) -> Occupied(wendie)\nforall x (Senegalese(x) -> Teeny(x))\nforall x (Sanguine(x) -> Teeny(x))\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Teeny(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) -> not Occupied(x))\nnot Senegalese(wendie) -> Inanimate(wendie)\nUnsatiable(wendie) and not Teeny(wendie) -> Inanimate(wendie)\n\nSanguine(wendie)\n\nnot Senegalese(wendie) and not Senegalese(wendie) -> Sanguine(wendie) -> therefore Sanguine(wendie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Milton is incognito. Milton is not upcountry. Milton is intended. If Milton is not upcountry then Milton is unbeloved. If Milton is hipless and Milton is not upcountry then Milton is meltable. All upcountry people are hipless. If someone is unbeloved then they are hipless. Young, hipless people are meltable. All ridiculous people are not meltable. If Milton is not upcountry then Milton is intended. If Milton is ridiculous and Milton is not hipless then Milton is intended. Milton is not unbeloved.", "logic": "\nIncognito(milton)\nnot Upcountry(milton)\nIntended(milton)\nnot Upcountry(milton) -> Unbeloved(milton)\nHipless(milton) and not Upcountry(milton) -> Meltable(milton)\nforall x (Upcountry(x) -> Hipless(x))\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) -> Hipless(x))\nforall x (Intended(x) and Hipless(x) -> Meltable(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> not Meltable(x))\nnot Upcountry(milton) -> Intended(milton)\nRidiculous(milton) and not Hipless(milton) -> Intended(milton)\n\nnot Unbeloved(milton)\n\nnot Upcountry(milton) and not Upcountry(milton) -> Unbeloved(milton) -> therefore Unbeloved(milton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Fancy is fraudulent. Fancy is not uproarious. Fancy is christless. If Fancy is not uproarious then Fancy is soulful. If Fancy is coagulable and Fancy is not uproarious then Fancy is hale. All uproarious people are coagulable. If someone is soulful then they are coagulable. Young, coagulable people are hale. All duodecimal people are not hale. If Fancy is not uproarious then Fancy is christless. If Fancy is duodecimal and Fancy is not coagulable then Fancy is christless. Fancy is coagulable.", "logic": "\nFraudulent(fancy)\nnot Uproarious(fancy)\nChristless(fancy)\nnot Uproarious(fancy) -> Soulful(fancy)\nCoagulable(fancy) and not Uproarious(fancy) -> Hale(fancy)\nforall x (Uproarious(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nforall x (Soulful(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nforall x (Christless(x) and Coagulable(x) -> Hale(x))\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> not Hale(x))\nnot Uproarious(fancy) -> Christless(fancy)\nDuodecimal(fancy) and not Coagulable(fancy) -> Christless(fancy)\n\nCoagulable(fancy)\n\nnot Uproarious(fancy) and not Uproarious(fancy) -> Soulful(fancy) -> therefore Soulful(fancy) Soulful(fancy) and forall x (Soulful(x) -> Coagulable(x)) -> therefore Coagulable(fancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Cybil is slaked. Cybil is not bountiful. Cybil is chestnut. If Cybil is not bountiful then Cybil is sporting. If Cybil is miasmic and Cybil is not bountiful then Cybil is cytotoxic. All bountiful people are miasmic. If someone is sporting then they are miasmic. Young, miasmic people are cytotoxic. All eastbound people are not cytotoxic. If Cybil is not bountiful then Cybil is chestnut. If Cybil is eastbound and Cybil is not miasmic then Cybil is chestnut. Cybil is not miasmic.", "logic": "\nSlaked(cybil)\nnot Bountiful(cybil)\nChestnut(cybil)\nnot Bountiful(cybil) -> Sporting(cybil)\nMiasmic(cybil) and not Bountiful(cybil) -> Cytotoxic(cybil)\nforall x (Bountiful(x) -> Miasmic(x))\nforall x (Sporting(x) -> Miasmic(x))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) and Miasmic(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> not Cytotoxic(x))\nnot Bountiful(cybil) -> Chestnut(cybil)\nEastbound(cybil) and not Miasmic(cybil) -> Chestnut(cybil)\n\nnot Miasmic(cybil)\n\nnot Bountiful(cybil) and not Bountiful(cybil) -> Sporting(cybil) -> therefore Sporting(cybil) Sporting(cybil) and forall x (Sporting(x) -> Miasmic(x)) -> therefore Miasmic(cybil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Dehlia is fungicidal. Dehlia is not misshapen. Dehlia is biracial. If Dehlia is not misshapen then Dehlia is bridal. If Dehlia is relaxed and Dehlia is not misshapen then Dehlia is inhabited. All misshapen people are relaxed. If someone is bridal then they are relaxed. Young, relaxed people are inhabited. All carpellary people are not inhabited. If Dehlia is not misshapen then Dehlia is biracial. If Dehlia is carpellary and Dehlia is not relaxed then Dehlia is biracial. Dehlia is inhabited.", "logic": "\nFungicidal(dehlia)\nnot Misshapen(dehlia)\nBiracial(dehlia)\nnot Misshapen(dehlia) -> Bridal(dehlia)\nRelaxed(dehlia) and not Misshapen(dehlia) -> Inhabited(dehlia)\nforall x (Misshapen(x) -> Relaxed(x))\nforall x (Bridal(x) -> Relaxed(x))\nforall x (Biracial(x) and Relaxed(x) -> Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Carpellary(x) -> not Inhabited(x))\nnot Misshapen(dehlia) -> Biracial(dehlia)\nCarpellary(dehlia) and not Relaxed(dehlia) -> Biracial(dehlia)\n\nInhabited(dehlia)\n\nnot Misshapen(dehlia) and not Misshapen(dehlia) -> Bridal(dehlia) -> therefore Bridal(dehlia) Bridal(dehlia) and forall x (Bridal(x) -> Relaxed(x)) -> therefore Relaxed(dehlia) Biracial(dehlia) and Relaxed(dehlia) and forall x (Biracial(x) and Relaxed(x) -> Inhabited(x)) -> therefore Inhabited(dehlia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Nike is seeable. Nike is not schmaltzy. Nike is limacine. If Nike is not schmaltzy then Nike is dioestrual. If Nike is quotable and Nike is not schmaltzy then Nike is alienable. All schmaltzy people are quotable. If someone is dioestrual then they are quotable. Young, quotable people are alienable. All sociable people are not alienable. If Nike is not schmaltzy then Nike is limacine. If Nike is sociable and Nike is not quotable then Nike is limacine. Nike is not alienable.", "logic": "\nSeeable(nike)\nnot Schmaltzy(nike)\nLimacine(nike)\nnot Schmaltzy(nike) -> Dioestrual(nike)\nQuotable(nike) and not Schmaltzy(nike) -> Alienable(nike)\nforall x (Schmaltzy(x) -> Quotable(x))\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) -> Quotable(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Quotable(x) -> Alienable(x))\nforall x (Sociable(x) -> not Alienable(x))\nnot Schmaltzy(nike) -> Limacine(nike)\nSociable(nike) and not Quotable(nike) -> Limacine(nike)\n\nnot Alienable(nike)\n\nnot Schmaltzy(nike) and not Schmaltzy(nike) -> Dioestrual(nike) -> therefore Dioestrual(nike) Dioestrual(nike) and forall x (Dioestrual(x) -> Quotable(x)) -> therefore Quotable(nike) Limacine(nike) and Quotable(nike) and forall x (Limacine(x) and Quotable(x) -> Alienable(x)) -> therefore Alienable(nike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Pace is acetylenic. Reinhard is hammered. Reinhard is epiphyseal. Reinhard is unengaged. Reinhard is sudorific. Reinhard is acetylenic. Reinhard is sisterlike. Reinhard is oscine. Saudra is hammered. Saudra is epiphyseal. Saudra is unengaged. Saudra is sudorific. Saudra is acetylenic. Saudra is sisterlike. Saudra is oscine. If someone is epiphyseal and sisterlike then they are unengaged. If Saudra is sisterlike then Saudra is epiphyseal. Cold, sudorific people are oscine. If someone is acetylenic then they are oscine. White, acetylenic people are unengaged. All epiphyseal, unengaged people are hammered. All unengaged, oscine people are sisterlike. All hammered, sisterlike people are oscine. Reinhard is epiphyseal.", "logic": "\nAcetylenic(pace)\nHammered(reinhard)\nEpiphyseal(reinhard)\nUnengaged(reinhard)\nSudorific(reinhard)\nAcetylenic(reinhard)\nSisterlike(reinhard)\nOscine(reinhard)\nHammered(saudra)\nEpiphyseal(saudra)\nUnengaged(saudra)\nSudorific(saudra)\nAcetylenic(saudra)\nSisterlike(saudra)\nOscine(saudra)\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) and Sisterlike(x) -> Unengaged(x))\nSisterlike(saudra) -> Epiphyseal(saudra)\nforall x (Unengaged(x) and Sudorific(x) -> Oscine(x))\nforall x (Acetylenic(x) -> Oscine(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) and Acetylenic(x) -> Unengaged(x))\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) and Unengaged(x) -> Hammered(x))\nforall x (Unengaged(x) and Oscine(x) -> Sisterlike(x))\nforall x (Hammered(x) and Sisterlike(x) -> Oscine(x))\n\nEpiphyseal(reinhard)\n\ntherefore Epiphyseal(reinhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Anni is asphaltic. Adriane is outsized. Adriane is assisted. Adriane is pietistic. Adriane is mystical. Adriane is asphaltic. Adriane is correct. Adriane is doubting. Brynna is outsized. Brynna is assisted. Brynna is pietistic. Brynna is mystical. Brynna is asphaltic. Brynna is correct. Brynna is doubting. If someone is assisted and correct then they are pietistic. If Brynna is correct then Brynna is assisted. Cold, mystical people are doubting. If someone is asphaltic then they are doubting. White, asphaltic people are pietistic. All assisted, pietistic people are outsized. All pietistic, doubting people are correct. All outsized, correct people are doubting. Adriane is not outsized.", "logic": "\nAsphaltic(anni)\nOutsized(adriane)\nAssisted(adriane)\nPietistic(adriane)\nMystical(adriane)\nAsphaltic(adriane)\nCorrect(adriane)\nDoubting(adriane)\nOutsized(brynna)\nAssisted(brynna)\nPietistic(brynna)\nMystical(brynna)\nAsphaltic(brynna)\nCorrect(brynna)\nDoubting(brynna)\nforall x (Assisted(x) and Correct(x) -> Pietistic(x))\nCorrect(brynna) -> Assisted(brynna)\nforall x (Pietistic(x) and Mystical(x) -> Doubting(x))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) -> Doubting(x))\nforall x (Doubting(x) and Asphaltic(x) -> Pietistic(x))\nforall x (Assisted(x) and Pietistic(x) -> Outsized(x))\nforall x (Pietistic(x) and Doubting(x) -> Correct(x))\nforall x (Outsized(x) and Correct(x) -> Doubting(x))\n\nnot Outsized(adriane)\n\ntherefore Outsized(adriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Roarke is serologic. Temp is voluntary. Temp is visualised. Temp is butcherly. Temp is enceinte. Temp is serologic. Temp is infective. Temp is according. Kalindi is voluntary. Kalindi is visualised. Kalindi is butcherly. Kalindi is enceinte. Kalindi is serologic. Kalindi is infective. Kalindi is according. If someone is visualised and infective then they are butcherly. If Kalindi is infective then Kalindi is visualised. Cold, enceinte people are according. If someone is serologic then they are according. White, serologic people are butcherly. All visualised, butcherly people are voluntary. All butcherly, according people are infective. All voluntary, infective people are according. Roarke is according.", "logic": "\nSerologic(roarke)\nVoluntary(temp)\nVisualised(temp)\nButcherly(temp)\nEnceinte(temp)\nSerologic(temp)\nInfective(temp)\nAccording(temp)\nVoluntary(kalindi)\nVisualised(kalindi)\nButcherly(kalindi)\nEnceinte(kalindi)\nSerologic(kalindi)\nInfective(kalindi)\nAccording(kalindi)\nforall x (Visualised(x) and Infective(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nInfective(kalindi) -> Visualised(kalindi)\nforall x (Butcherly(x) and Enceinte(x) -> According(x))\nforall x (Serologic(x) -> According(x))\nforall x (According(x) and Serologic(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) and Butcherly(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) and According(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) and Infective(x) -> According(x))\n\nAccording(roarke)\n\nSerologic(roarke) and forall x (Serologic(x) -> According(x)) -> therefore According(roarke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Jamey is felonious. Raynor is sottish. Raynor is lightless. Raynor is oldline. Raynor is labile. Raynor is felonious. Raynor is riparian. Raynor is fetal. Sascha is sottish. Sascha is lightless. Sascha is oldline. Sascha is labile. Sascha is felonious. Sascha is riparian. Sascha is fetal. If someone is lightless and riparian then they are oldline. If Sascha is riparian then Sascha is lightless. Cold, labile people are fetal. If someone is felonious then they are fetal. White, felonious people are oldline. All lightless, oldline people are sottish. All oldline, fetal people are riparian. All sottish, riparian people are fetal. Jamey is not fetal.", "logic": "\nFelonious(jamey)\nSottish(raynor)\nLightless(raynor)\nOldline(raynor)\nLabile(raynor)\nFelonious(raynor)\nRiparian(raynor)\nFetal(raynor)\nSottish(sascha)\nLightless(sascha)\nOldline(sascha)\nLabile(sascha)\nFelonious(sascha)\nRiparian(sascha)\nFetal(sascha)\nforall x (Lightless(x) and Riparian(x) -> Oldline(x))\nRiparian(sascha) -> Lightless(sascha)\nforall x (Oldline(x) and Labile(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Fetal(x) and Felonious(x) -> Oldline(x))\nforall x (Lightless(x) and Oldline(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Oldline(x) and Fetal(x) -> Riparian(x))\nforall x (Sottish(x) and Riparian(x) -> Fetal(x))\n\nnot Fetal(jamey)\n\nFelonious(jamey) and forall x (Felonious(x) -> Fetal(x)) -> therefore Fetal(jamey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Dorotea is hopeful. Standford is ichorous. Standford is misogynic. Standford is caesarian. Standford is unneeded. Standford is hopeful. Standford is cometic. Standford is bald. Sarajane is ichorous. Sarajane is misogynic. Sarajane is caesarian. Sarajane is unneeded. Sarajane is hopeful. Sarajane is cometic. Sarajane is bald. If someone is misogynic and cometic then they are caesarian. If Sarajane is cometic then Sarajane is misogynic. Cold, unneeded people are bald. If someone is hopeful then they are bald. White, hopeful people are caesarian. All misogynic, caesarian people are ichorous. All caesarian, bald people are cometic. All ichorous, cometic people are bald. Dorotea is caesarian.", "logic": "\nHopeful(dorotea)\nIchorous(standford)\nMisogynic(standford)\nCaesarian(standford)\nUnneeded(standford)\nHopeful(standford)\nCometic(standford)\nBald(standford)\nIchorous(sarajane)\nMisogynic(sarajane)\nCaesarian(sarajane)\nUnneeded(sarajane)\nHopeful(sarajane)\nCometic(sarajane)\nBald(sarajane)\nforall x (Misogynic(x) and Cometic(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nCometic(sarajane) -> Misogynic(sarajane)\nforall x (Caesarian(x) and Unneeded(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Hopeful(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Misogynic(x) and Caesarian(x) -> Ichorous(x))\nforall x (Caesarian(x) and Bald(x) -> Cometic(x))\nforall x (Ichorous(x) and Cometic(x) -> Bald(x))\n\nCaesarian(dorotea)\n\nHopeful(dorotea) and forall x (Hopeful(x) -> Bald(x)) -> therefore Bald(dorotea) Bald(dorotea) and Hopeful(dorotea) and forall x (Bald(x) and Hopeful(x) -> Caesarian(x)) -> therefore Caesarian(dorotea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Yolanda is rangy. Bengt is catholic. Bengt is dianoetic. Bengt is auld. Bengt is snub. Bengt is rangy. Bengt is chafed. Bengt is ectodermal. Odilia is catholic. Odilia is dianoetic. Odilia is auld. Odilia is snub. Odilia is rangy. Odilia is chafed. Odilia is ectodermal. If someone is dianoetic and chafed then they are auld. If Odilia is chafed then Odilia is dianoetic. Cold, snub people are ectodermal. If someone is rangy then they are ectodermal. White, rangy people are auld. All dianoetic, auld people are catholic. All auld, ectodermal people are chafed. All catholic, chafed people are ectodermal. Yolanda is not auld.", "logic": "\nRangy(yolanda)\nCatholic(bengt)\nDianoetic(bengt)\nAuld(bengt)\nSnub(bengt)\nRangy(bengt)\nChafed(bengt)\nEctodermal(bengt)\nCatholic(odilia)\nDianoetic(odilia)\nAuld(odilia)\nSnub(odilia)\nRangy(odilia)\nChafed(odilia)\nEctodermal(odilia)\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Chafed(x) -> Auld(x))\nChafed(odilia) -> Dianoetic(odilia)\nforall x (Auld(x) and Snub(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Rangy(x) -> Auld(x))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Auld(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Auld(x) and Ectodermal(x) -> Chafed(x))\nforall x (Catholic(x) and Chafed(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\n\nnot Auld(yolanda)\n\nRangy(yolanda) and forall x (Rangy(x) -> Ectodermal(x)) -> therefore Ectodermal(yolanda) Ectodermal(yolanda) and Rangy(yolanda) and forall x (Ectodermal(x) and Rangy(x) -> Auld(x)) -> therefore Auld(yolanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Nada is lemonlike. King is pierced. King is insanitary. King is exsanguine. King is wifely. King is lemonlike. King is insightful. King is anxious. Shanda is pierced. Shanda is insanitary. Shanda is exsanguine. Shanda is wifely. Shanda is lemonlike. Shanda is insightful. Shanda is anxious. If someone is insanitary and insightful then they are exsanguine. If Shanda is insightful then Shanda is insanitary. Cold, wifely people are anxious. If someone is lemonlike then they are anxious. White, lemonlike people are exsanguine. All insanitary, exsanguine people are pierced. All exsanguine, anxious people are insightful. All pierced, insightful people are anxious. Nada is insightful.", "logic": "\nLemonlike(nada)\nPierced(king)\nInsanitary(king)\nExsanguine(king)\nWifely(king)\nLemonlike(king)\nInsightful(king)\nAnxious(king)\nPierced(shanda)\nInsanitary(shanda)\nExsanguine(shanda)\nWifely(shanda)\nLemonlike(shanda)\nInsightful(shanda)\nAnxious(shanda)\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Insightful(x) -> Exsanguine(x))\nInsightful(shanda) -> Insanitary(shanda)\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Wifely(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Anxious(x) and Lemonlike(x) -> Exsanguine(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Exsanguine(x) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Anxious(x) -> Insightful(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) and Insightful(x) -> Anxious(x))\n\nInsightful(nada)\n\nLemonlike(nada) and forall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Anxious(x)) -> therefore Anxious(nada) Anxious(nada) and Lemonlike(nada) and forall x (Anxious(x) and Lemonlike(x) -> Exsanguine(x)) -> therefore Exsanguine(nada) Lemonlike(nada) and forall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Anxious(x)) -> therefore Anxious(nada) Exsanguine(nada) and Anxious(nada) and forall x (Exsanguine(x) and Anxious(x) -> Insightful(x)) -> therefore Insightful(nada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Gerard is bulbaceous. Xenia is argentic. Xenia is sugarless. Xenia is coital. Xenia is dandy. Xenia is bulbaceous. Xenia is mesmeric. Xenia is fingered. Corrina is argentic. Corrina is sugarless. Corrina is coital. Corrina is dandy. Corrina is bulbaceous. Corrina is mesmeric. Corrina is fingered. If someone is sugarless and mesmeric then they are coital. If Corrina is mesmeric then Corrina is sugarless. Cold, dandy people are fingered. If someone is bulbaceous then they are fingered. White, bulbaceous people are coital. All sugarless, coital people are argentic. All coital, fingered people are mesmeric. All argentic, mesmeric people are fingered. Gerard is not mesmeric.", "logic": "\nBulbaceous(gerard)\nArgentic(xenia)\nSugarless(xenia)\nCoital(xenia)\nDandy(xenia)\nBulbaceous(xenia)\nMesmeric(xenia)\nFingered(xenia)\nArgentic(corrina)\nSugarless(corrina)\nCoital(corrina)\nDandy(corrina)\nBulbaceous(corrina)\nMesmeric(corrina)\nFingered(corrina)\nforall x (Sugarless(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Coital(x))\nMesmeric(corrina) -> Sugarless(corrina)\nforall x (Coital(x) and Dandy(x) -> Fingered(x))\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Fingered(x))\nforall x (Fingered(x) and Bulbaceous(x) -> Coital(x))\nforall x (Sugarless(x) and Coital(x) -> Argentic(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) and Fingered(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Argentic(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Fingered(x))\n\nnot Mesmeric(gerard)\n\nBulbaceous(gerard) and forall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Fingered(x)) -> therefore Fingered(gerard) Fingered(gerard) and Bulbaceous(gerard) and forall x (Fingered(x) and Bulbaceous(x) -> Coital(x)) -> therefore Coital(gerard) Bulbaceous(gerard) and forall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Fingered(x)) -> therefore Fingered(gerard) Coital(gerard) and Fingered(gerard) and forall x (Coital(x) and Fingered(x) -> Mesmeric(x)) -> therefore Mesmeric(gerard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Costa is kechuan. Tiena is awash. Tiena is unavailing. Tiena is gaseous. Tiena is compulsory. Tiena is kechuan. Tiena is astomatal. Tiena is expanded. Phineas is awash. Phineas is unavailing. Phineas is gaseous. Phineas is compulsory. Phineas is kechuan. Phineas is astomatal. Phineas is expanded. If someone is unavailing and astomatal then they are gaseous. If Phineas is astomatal then Phineas is unavailing. Cold, compulsory people are expanded. If someone is kechuan then they are expanded. White, kechuan people are gaseous. All unavailing, gaseous people are awash. All gaseous, expanded people are astomatal. All awash, astomatal people are expanded. Costa is not awash.", "logic": "\nKechuan(costa)\nAwash(tiena)\nUnavailing(tiena)\nGaseous(tiena)\nCompulsory(tiena)\nKechuan(tiena)\nAstomatal(tiena)\nExpanded(tiena)\nAwash(phineas)\nUnavailing(phineas)\nGaseous(phineas)\nCompulsory(phineas)\nKechuan(phineas)\nAstomatal(phineas)\nExpanded(phineas)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) and Astomatal(x) -> Gaseous(x))\nAstomatal(phineas) -> Unavailing(phineas)\nforall x (Gaseous(x) and Compulsory(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Kechuan(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Expanded(x) and Kechuan(x) -> Gaseous(x))\nforall x (Unavailing(x) and Gaseous(x) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Gaseous(x) and Expanded(x) -> Astomatal(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Astomatal(x) -> Expanded(x))\n\nnot Awash(costa)\n\nforall x (Unavailing(x) and Gaseous(x) -> Awash(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Betsey is ariled. Victor is argentine. Victor is pockmarked. Victor is plundering. Victor is briny. Victor is ariled. Victor is unequalled. Victor is debased. Elysha is argentine. Elysha is pockmarked. Elysha is plundering. Elysha is briny. Elysha is ariled. Elysha is unequalled. Elysha is debased. If someone is pockmarked and unequalled then they are plundering. If Elysha is unequalled then Elysha is pockmarked. Cold, briny people are debased. If someone is ariled then they are debased. White, ariled people are plundering. All pockmarked, plundering people are argentine. All plundering, debased people are unequalled. All argentine, unequalled people are debased. Betsey is briny.", "logic": "\nAriled(betsey)\nArgentine(victor)\nPockmarked(victor)\nPlundering(victor)\nBriny(victor)\nAriled(victor)\nUnequalled(victor)\nDebased(victor)\nArgentine(elysha)\nPockmarked(elysha)\nPlundering(elysha)\nBriny(elysha)\nAriled(elysha)\nUnequalled(elysha)\nDebased(elysha)\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) and Unequalled(x) -> Plundering(x))\nUnequalled(elysha) -> Pockmarked(elysha)\nforall x (Plundering(x) and Briny(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Ariled(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Debased(x) and Ariled(x) -> Plundering(x))\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) and Plundering(x) -> Argentine(x))\nforall x (Plundering(x) and Debased(x) -> Unequalled(x))\nforall x (Argentine(x) and Unequalled(x) -> Debased(x))\n\nBriny(betsey)\n\nBriny(betsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "The caterina is beguiling. Big things are agonal. Nice things are posthumous. All beguiling things are distracted. The caterina is beguiling.", "logic": "\nBeguiling(caterina)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) -> Posthumous(x))\nforall x (Beguiling(x) -> Distracted(x))\n\nBeguiling(caterina)\n\ntherefore Beguiling(caterina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The lamar is homesick. Big things are enzootic. Nice things are unleaded. All homesick things are ripe. The lamar is not homesick.", "logic": "\nHomesick(lamar)\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Enzootic(x))\nforall x (Ripe(x) -> Unleaded(x))\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Ripe(x))\n\nnot Homesick(lamar)\n\ntherefore Homesick(lamar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The andreas is rugged. Big things are featured. Nice things are packable. All rugged things are mettlesome. The andreas is mettlesome.", "logic": "\nRugged(andreas)\nforall x (Packable(x) -> Featured(x))\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) -> Packable(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) -> Mettlesome(x))\n\nMettlesome(andreas)\n\nRugged(andreas) and forall x (Rugged(x) -> Mettlesome(x)) -> therefore Mettlesome(andreas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The duffie is ripping. Big things are brickly. Nice things are arciform. All ripping things are polygenic. The duffie is not polygenic.", "logic": "\nRipping(duffie)\nforall x (Arciform(x) -> Brickly(x))\nforall x (Polygenic(x) -> Arciform(x))\nforall x (Ripping(x) -> Polygenic(x))\n\nnot Polygenic(duffie)\n\nRipping(duffie) and forall x (Ripping(x) -> Polygenic(x)) -> therefore Polygenic(duffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The konstance is basal. Big things are unrefined. Nice things are indisposed. All basal things are cosmic. The konstance is indisposed.", "logic": "\nBasal(konstance)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) -> Unrefined(x))\nforall x (Cosmic(x) -> Indisposed(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Cosmic(x))\n\nIndisposed(konstance)\n\nBasal(konstance) and forall x (Basal(x) -> Cosmic(x)) -> therefore Cosmic(konstance) Cosmic(konstance) and forall x (Cosmic(x) -> Indisposed(x)) -> therefore Indisposed(konstance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The zuzana is secluded. Big things are rhomboid. Nice things are dyspnoeic. All secluded things are apathetic. The zuzana is not dyspnoeic.", "logic": "\nSecluded(zuzana)\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> Rhomboid(x))\nforall x (Apathetic(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Secluded(x) -> Apathetic(x))\n\nnot Dyspnoeic(zuzana)\n\nSecluded(zuzana) and forall x (Secluded(x) -> Apathetic(x)) -> therefore Apathetic(zuzana) Apathetic(zuzana) and forall x (Apathetic(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x)) -> therefore Dyspnoeic(zuzana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The nahum is bearded. Big things are skilled. Nice things are balletic. All bearded things are elegant. The nahum is skilled.", "logic": "\nBearded(nahum)\nforall x (Balletic(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Elegant(x) -> Balletic(x))\nforall x (Bearded(x) -> Elegant(x))\n\nSkilled(nahum)\n\nBearded(nahum) and forall x (Bearded(x) -> Elegant(x)) -> therefore Elegant(nahum) Elegant(nahum) and forall x (Elegant(x) -> Balletic(x)) -> therefore Balletic(nahum) Balletic(nahum) and forall x (Balletic(x) -> Skilled(x)) -> therefore Skilled(nahum)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The rivalee is woozy. Big things are descendant. Nice things are tongueless. All woozy things are acetabular. The rivalee is not descendant.", "logic": "\nWoozy(rivalee)\nforall x (Tongueless(x) -> Descendant(x))\nforall x (Acetabular(x) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Woozy(x) -> Acetabular(x))\n\nnot Descendant(rivalee)\n\nWoozy(rivalee) and forall x (Woozy(x) -> Acetabular(x)) -> therefore Acetabular(rivalee) Acetabular(rivalee) and forall x (Acetabular(x) -> Tongueless(x)) -> therefore Tongueless(rivalee) Tongueless(rivalee) and forall x (Tongueless(x) -> Descendant(x)) -> therefore Descendant(rivalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The pammi is acarpelous. Big things are rhombic. Nice things are bahraini. All acarpelous things are undivided. The pammi does not chase the pammi.", "logic": "\nAcarpelous(pammi)\nforall x (Bahraini(x) -> Rhombic(x))\nforall x (Undivided(x) -> Bahraini(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Undivided(x))\n\nnot Chases(pammi, pammi)\n\nnot Chases(pammi, pammi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The welbie is maximum. Big things are spongy. Nice things are improper. All maximum things are destined. The welbie needs the welbie.", "logic": "\nMaximum(welbie)\nforall x (Improper(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Destined(x) -> Improper(x))\nforall x (Maximum(x) -> Destined(x))\n\nNeeds(welbie, welbie)\n\nNeeds(welbie, welbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The seymour is postictal. Big things are ornate. Nice things are alphameric. All postictal things are scurrilous. The seymour does not see the seymour.", "logic": "\nPostictal(seymour)\nforall x (Alphameric(x) -> Ornate(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) -> Alphameric(x))\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\n\nnot Sees(seymour, seymour)\n\nnot Sees(seymour, seymour) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The dell is million. Big things are nitrous. Nice things are severe. All million things are antiquated. The dell is kind.", "logic": "\nMillion(dell)\nforall x (Severe(x) -> Nitrous(x))\nforall x (Antiquated(x) -> Severe(x))\nforall x (Million(x) -> Antiquated(x))\n\nKind(dell)\n\nKind(dell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "Doris is christless. Doris is salutary. Doris is flightless. Doris is unabashed. Ronna is sorrowful. Ronna is flightless. Ronna is unabashed. Smart people are unraised. Cold, salutary people are unabashed. Young, sorrowful people are salutary. Kind, christless people are unraised. If Doris is oppressive and Doris is unraised then Doris is sorrowful. All christless, salutary people are oppressive. Doris is christless.", "logic": "\nChristless(doris)\nSalutary(doris)\nFlightless(doris)\nUnabashed(doris)\nSorrowful(ronna)\nFlightless(ronna)\nUnabashed(ronna)\nforall x (Oppressive(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Christless(x) and Salutary(x) -> Unabashed(x))\nforall x (Unabashed(x) and Sorrowful(x) -> Salutary(x))\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) and Christless(x) -> Unraised(x))\nOppressive(doris) and Unraised(doris) -> Sorrowful(doris)\nforall x (Christless(x) and Salutary(x) -> Oppressive(x))\n\nChristless(doris)\n\ntherefore Christless(doris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Sile is pent. Sile is spotted. Sile is valvular. Sile is pale. Raj is noticeable. Raj is valvular. Raj is pale. Smart people are bavarian. Cold, spotted people are pale. Young, noticeable people are spotted. Kind, pent people are bavarian. If Sile is rushed and Sile is bavarian then Sile is noticeable. All pent, spotted people are rushed. Sile is not pale.", "logic": "\nPent(sile)\nSpotted(sile)\nValvular(sile)\nPale(sile)\nNoticeable(raj)\nValvular(raj)\nPale(raj)\nforall x (Rushed(x) -> Bavarian(x))\nforall x (Pent(x) and Spotted(x) -> Pale(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) and Noticeable(x) -> Spotted(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) and Pent(x) -> Bavarian(x))\nRushed(sile) and Bavarian(sile) -> Noticeable(sile)\nforall x (Pent(x) and Spotted(x) -> Rushed(x))\n\nnot Pale(sile)\n\ntherefore Pale(sile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Trix is aberdonian. Trix is archival. Trix is attired. Trix is tardive. Dew is cosy. Dew is attired. Dew is tardive. Smart people are polemical. Cold, archival people are tardive. Young, cosy people are archival. Kind, aberdonian people are polemical. If Trix is candent and Trix is polemical then Trix is cosy. All aberdonian, archival people are candent. Trix is candent.", "logic": "\nAberdonian(trix)\nArchival(trix)\nAttired(trix)\nTardive(trix)\nCosy(dew)\nAttired(dew)\nTardive(dew)\nforall x (Candent(x) -> Polemical(x))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) and Archival(x) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Tardive(x) and Cosy(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Cosy(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Polemical(x))\nCandent(trix) and Polemical(trix) -> Cosy(trix)\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) and Archival(x) -> Candent(x))\n\nCandent(trix)\n\nAberdonian(trix) and Archival(trix) and forall x (Aberdonian(x) and Archival(x) -> Candent(x)) -> therefore Candent(trix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Hayden is cognisable. Hayden is squalid. Hayden is unworthy. Hayden is slovakian. Cara is coveted. Cara is unworthy. Cara is slovakian. Smart people are amygdaloid. Cold, squalid people are slovakian. Young, coveted people are squalid. Kind, cognisable people are amygdaloid. If Hayden is current and Hayden is amygdaloid then Hayden is coveted. All cognisable, squalid people are current. Cara is not squalid.", "logic": "\nCognisable(hayden)\nSqualid(hayden)\nUnworthy(hayden)\nSlovakian(hayden)\nCoveted(cara)\nUnworthy(cara)\nSlovakian(cara)\nforall x (Current(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) and Squalid(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Slovakian(x) and Coveted(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) and Cognisable(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\nCurrent(hayden) and Amygdaloid(hayden) -> Coveted(hayden)\nforall x (Cognisable(x) and Squalid(x) -> Current(x))\n\nnot Squalid(cara)\n\nSlovakian(cara) and Coveted(cara) and forall x (Slovakian(x) and Coveted(x) -> Squalid(x)) -> therefore Squalid(cara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Darlene is malign. Darlene is glacial. Darlene is spondaic. Darlene is unpurified. Caspar is defeated. Caspar is spondaic. Caspar is unpurified. Smart people are nonchalant. Cold, glacial people are unpurified. Young, defeated people are glacial. Kind, malign people are nonchalant. If Darlene is neutered and Darlene is nonchalant then Darlene is defeated. All malign, glacial people are neutered. Darlene is nonchalant.", "logic": "\nMalign(darlene)\nGlacial(darlene)\nSpondaic(darlene)\nUnpurified(darlene)\nDefeated(caspar)\nSpondaic(caspar)\nUnpurified(caspar)\nforall x (Neutered(x) -> Nonchalant(x))\nforall x (Malign(x) and Glacial(x) -> Unpurified(x))\nforall x (Unpurified(x) and Defeated(x) -> Glacial(x))\nforall x (Defeated(x) and Malign(x) -> Nonchalant(x))\nNeutered(darlene) and Nonchalant(darlene) -> Defeated(darlene)\nforall x (Malign(x) and Glacial(x) -> Neutered(x))\n\nNonchalant(darlene)\n\nMalign(darlene) and Glacial(darlene) and forall x (Malign(x) and Glacial(x) -> Neutered(x)) -> therefore Neutered(darlene) Neutered(darlene) and forall x (Neutered(x) -> Nonchalant(x)) -> therefore Nonchalant(darlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Marcelo is ovoid. Marcelo is mithraic. Marcelo is apneic. Marcelo is protrusile. Trevar is agonal. Trevar is apneic. Trevar is protrusile. Smart people are telltale. Cold, mithraic people are protrusile. Young, agonal people are mithraic. Kind, ovoid people are telltale. If Marcelo is washed and Marcelo is telltale then Marcelo is agonal. All ovoid, mithraic people are washed. Marcelo is not telltale.", "logic": "\nOvoid(marcelo)\nMithraic(marcelo)\nApneic(marcelo)\nProtrusile(marcelo)\nAgonal(trevar)\nApneic(trevar)\nProtrusile(trevar)\nforall x (Washed(x) -> Telltale(x))\nforall x (Ovoid(x) and Mithraic(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) and Agonal(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Agonal(x) and Ovoid(x) -> Telltale(x))\nWashed(marcelo) and Telltale(marcelo) -> Agonal(marcelo)\nforall x (Ovoid(x) and Mithraic(x) -> Washed(x))\n\nnot Telltale(marcelo)\n\nOvoid(marcelo) and Mithraic(marcelo) and forall x (Ovoid(x) and Mithraic(x) -> Washed(x)) -> therefore Washed(marcelo) Washed(marcelo) and forall x (Washed(x) -> Telltale(x)) -> therefore Telltale(marcelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Davidson is loaded. Davidson is running. Davidson is animate. Davidson is bombastic. Karia is outflowing. Karia is animate. Karia is bombastic. Smart people are heraldic. Cold, running people are bombastic. Young, outflowing people are running. Kind, loaded people are heraldic. If Davidson is reassured and Davidson is heraldic then Davidson is outflowing. All loaded, running people are reassured. Davidson is outflowing.", "logic": "\nLoaded(davidson)\nRunning(davidson)\nAnimate(davidson)\nBombastic(davidson)\nOutflowing(karia)\nAnimate(karia)\nBombastic(karia)\nforall x (Reassured(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Loaded(x) and Running(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and Outflowing(x) -> Running(x))\nforall x (Outflowing(x) and Loaded(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nReassured(davidson) and Heraldic(davidson) -> Outflowing(davidson)\nforall x (Loaded(x) and Running(x) -> Reassured(x))\n\nOutflowing(davidson)\n\nLoaded(davidson) and Running(davidson) and forall x (Loaded(x) and Running(x) -> Reassured(x)) -> therefore Reassured(davidson) Loaded(davidson) and Running(davidson) and forall x (Loaded(x) and Running(x) -> Reassured(x)) -> therefore Reassured(davidson) Reassured(davidson) and forall x (Reassured(x) -> Heraldic(x)) -> therefore Heraldic(davidson) Reassured(davidson) and Heraldic(davidson) and Reassured(davidson) and Heraldic(davidson) -> Outflowing(davidson) -> therefore Outflowing(davidson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Tarrance is shallow. Tarrance is center. Tarrance is loose. Tarrance is harmless. Ema is reputable. Ema is loose. Ema is harmless. Smart people are merciless. Cold, center people are harmless. Young, reputable people are center. Kind, shallow people are merciless. If Tarrance is oneiric and Tarrance is merciless then Tarrance is reputable. All shallow, center people are oneiric. Tarrance is not reputable.", "logic": "\nShallow(tarrance)\nCenter(tarrance)\nLoose(tarrance)\nHarmless(tarrance)\nReputable(ema)\nLoose(ema)\nHarmless(ema)\nforall x (Oneiric(x) -> Merciless(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Center(x) -> Harmless(x))\nforall x (Harmless(x) and Reputable(x) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Reputable(x) and Shallow(x) -> Merciless(x))\nOneiric(tarrance) and Merciless(tarrance) -> Reputable(tarrance)\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Center(x) -> Oneiric(x))\n\nnot Reputable(tarrance)\n\nShallow(tarrance) and Center(tarrance) and forall x (Shallow(x) and Center(x) -> Oneiric(x)) -> therefore Oneiric(tarrance) Shallow(tarrance) and Center(tarrance) and forall x (Shallow(x) and Center(x) -> Oneiric(x)) -> therefore Oneiric(tarrance) Oneiric(tarrance) and forall x (Oneiric(x) -> Merciless(x)) -> therefore Merciless(tarrance) Oneiric(tarrance) and Merciless(tarrance) and Oneiric(tarrance) and Merciless(tarrance) -> Reputable(tarrance) -> therefore Reputable(tarrance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Jocelyn is bemused. Jocelyn is charming. Jocelyn is unsorted. Jocelyn is coarctate. Arleen is sudorific. Arleen is unsorted. Arleen is coarctate. Smart people are epistolary. Cold, charming people are coarctate. Young, sudorific people are charming. Kind, bemused people are epistolary. If Jocelyn is ahorse and Jocelyn is epistolary then Jocelyn is sudorific. All bemused, charming people are ahorse. Arleen is not ahorse.", "logic": "\nBemused(jocelyn)\nCharming(jocelyn)\nUnsorted(jocelyn)\nCoarctate(jocelyn)\nSudorific(arleen)\nUnsorted(arleen)\nCoarctate(arleen)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Epistolary(x))\nforall x (Bemused(x) and Charming(x) -> Coarctate(x))\nforall x (Coarctate(x) and Sudorific(x) -> Charming(x))\nforall x (Sudorific(x) and Bemused(x) -> Epistolary(x))\nAhorse(jocelyn) and Epistolary(jocelyn) -> Sudorific(jocelyn)\nforall x (Bemused(x) and Charming(x) -> Ahorse(x))\n\nnot Ahorse(arleen)\n\nforall x (Bemused(x) and Charming(x) -> Ahorse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Mabelle is freeborn. Mabelle is arawakan. Mabelle is chaffy. Mabelle is harmonic. Willie is hidebound. Willie is chaffy. Willie is harmonic. Smart people are encircled. Cold, arawakan people are harmonic. Young, hidebound people are arawakan. Kind, freeborn people are encircled. If Mabelle is cytolytic and Mabelle is encircled then Mabelle is hidebound. All freeborn, arawakan people are cytolytic. Willie is encircled.", "logic": "\nFreeborn(mabelle)\nArawakan(mabelle)\nChaffy(mabelle)\nHarmonic(mabelle)\nHidebound(willie)\nChaffy(willie)\nHarmonic(willie)\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Encircled(x))\nforall x (Freeborn(x) and Arawakan(x) -> Harmonic(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Hidebound(x) -> Arawakan(x))\nforall x (Hidebound(x) and Freeborn(x) -> Encircled(x))\nCytolytic(mabelle) and Encircled(mabelle) -> Hidebound(mabelle)\nforall x (Freeborn(x) and Arawakan(x) -> Cytolytic(x))\n\nEncircled(willie)\n\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Encircled(x)) <- forall x (Freeborn(x) and Arawakan(x) -> Cytolytic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Francis is periwigged. Francis is handmade. Claribel is periwigged. Claribel is malleable. Tish is periwigged. Myriam is malleable. Myriam is enchanted. All lengthways things are enchanted. If something is algal and handmade then it is enchanted. If something is periwigged and handmade then it is enchanted. Round things are handmade. All lengthways things are algal. All periwigged things are handmade. If something is enchanted then it is algal. If Claribel is handmade then Claribel is periwigged. Francis is periwigged.", "logic": "\nPeriwigged(francis)\nHandmade(francis)\nPeriwigged(claribel)\nMalleable(claribel)\nPeriwigged(tish)\nMalleable(myriam)\nEnchanted(myriam)\nforall x (Lengthways(x) -> Enchanted(x))\nforall x (Algal(x) and Handmade(x) -> Enchanted(x))\nforall x (Periwigged(x) and Handmade(x) -> Enchanted(x))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Handmade(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) -> Algal(x))\nforall x (Periwigged(x) -> Handmade(x))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Algal(x))\nHandmade(claribel) -> Periwigged(claribel)\n\nPeriwigged(francis)\n\ntherefore Periwigged(francis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Annmarie is affirmable. Annmarie is segmented. Shane is affirmable. Shane is sabahan. Edy is affirmable. Cathe is sabahan. Cathe is capacitive. All biased things are capacitive. If something is fiery and segmented then it is capacitive. If something is affirmable and segmented then it is capacitive. Round things are segmented. All biased things are fiery. All affirmable things are segmented. If something is capacitive then it is fiery. If Shane is segmented then Shane is affirmable. Shane is not affirmable.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(annmarie)\nSegmented(annmarie)\nAffirmable(shane)\nSabahan(shane)\nAffirmable(edy)\nSabahan(cathe)\nCapacitive(cathe)\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nforall x (Fiery(x) and Segmented(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) and Segmented(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) -> Segmented(x))\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Segmented(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) -> Fiery(x))\nSegmented(shane) -> Affirmable(shane)\n\nnot Affirmable(shane)\n\ntherefore Affirmable(shane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Chevy is fungous. Chevy is nosey. Stevena is fungous. Stevena is bacillary. Regina is fungous. Andres is bacillary. Andres is formulaic. All alleged things are formulaic. If something is structured and nosey then it is formulaic. If something is fungous and nosey then it is formulaic. Round things are nosey. All alleged things are structured. All fungous things are nosey. If something is formulaic then it is structured. If Stevena is nosey then Stevena is fungous. Andres is structured.", "logic": "\nFungous(chevy)\nNosey(chevy)\nFungous(stevena)\nBacillary(stevena)\nFungous(regina)\nBacillary(andres)\nFormulaic(andres)\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Formulaic(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) and Nosey(x) -> Formulaic(x))\nforall x (Fungous(x) and Nosey(x) -> Formulaic(x))\nforall x (Formulaic(x) -> Nosey(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Structured(x))\nforall x (Fungous(x) -> Nosey(x))\nforall x (Formulaic(x) -> Structured(x))\nNosey(stevena) -> Fungous(stevena)\n\nStructured(andres)\n\nFormulaic(andres) and forall x (Formulaic(x) -> Structured(x)) -> therefore Structured(andres)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Cherin is violable. Cherin is untried. Upton is violable. Upton is silver. Josephus is violable. Simon is silver. Simon is fanatical. All adoptable things are fanatical. If something is silky and untried then it is fanatical. If something is violable and untried then it is fanatical. Round things are untried. All adoptable things are silky. All violable things are untried. If something is fanatical then it is silky. If Upton is untried then Upton is violable. Upton is not untried.", "logic": "\nViolable(cherin)\nUntried(cherin)\nViolable(upton)\nSilver(upton)\nViolable(josephus)\nSilver(simon)\nFanatical(simon)\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Fanatical(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) and Untried(x) -> Fanatical(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) and Untried(x) -> Fanatical(x))\nforall x (Fanatical(x) -> Untried(x))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Silky(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) -> Untried(x))\nforall x (Fanatical(x) -> Silky(x))\nUntried(upton) -> Violable(upton)\n\nnot Untried(upton)\n\nViolable(upton) and forall x (Violable(x) -> Untried(x)) -> therefore Untried(upton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Consuela is uncolored. Consuela is derelict. Christos is uncolored. Christos is plaguey. Margery is uncolored. Vasili is plaguey. Vasili is appetizing. All pyrrhic things are appetizing. If something is wroth and derelict then it is appetizing. If something is uncolored and derelict then it is appetizing. Round things are derelict. All pyrrhic things are wroth. All uncolored things are derelict. If something is appetizing then it is wroth. If Christos is derelict then Christos is uncolored. Christos is appetizing.", "logic": "\nUncolored(consuela)\nDerelict(consuela)\nUncolored(christos)\nPlaguey(christos)\nUncolored(margery)\nPlaguey(vasili)\nAppetizing(vasili)\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nforall x (Wroth(x) and Derelict(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and Derelict(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) -> Derelict(x))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) -> Wroth(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Derelict(x))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) -> Wroth(x))\nDerelict(christos) -> Uncolored(christos)\n\nAppetizing(christos)\n\nUncolored(christos) and forall x (Uncolored(x) -> Derelict(x)) -> therefore Derelict(christos) Uncolored(christos) and Derelict(christos) and forall x (Uncolored(x) and Derelict(x) -> Appetizing(x)) -> therefore Appetizing(christos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Nicol is indigent. Nicol is undying. Mike is indigent. Mike is lossy. Giffer is indigent. Briana is lossy. Briana is allopatric. All sacrosanct things are allopatric. If something is weakly and undying then it is allopatric. If something is indigent and undying then it is allopatric. Round things are undying. All sacrosanct things are weakly. All indigent things are undying. If something is allopatric then it is weakly. If Mike is undying then Mike is indigent. Mike is not allopatric.", "logic": "\nIndigent(nicol)\nUndying(nicol)\nIndigent(mike)\nLossy(mike)\nIndigent(giffer)\nLossy(briana)\nAllopatric(briana)\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Weakly(x) and Undying(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Indigent(x) and Undying(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) -> Undying(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Weakly(x))\nforall x (Indigent(x) -> Undying(x))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) -> Weakly(x))\nUndying(mike) -> Indigent(mike)\n\nnot Allopatric(mike)\n\nIndigent(mike) and forall x (Indigent(x) -> Undying(x)) -> therefore Undying(mike) Indigent(mike) and Undying(mike) and forall x (Indigent(x) and Undying(x) -> Allopatric(x)) -> therefore Allopatric(mike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Lawton is dosed. Lawton is humpbacked. Tremaine is dosed. Tremaine is bearing. Stanly is dosed. Angel is bearing. Angel is separatist. All given things are separatist. If something is unrealised and humpbacked then it is separatist. If something is dosed and humpbacked then it is separatist. Round things are humpbacked. All given things are unrealised. All dosed things are humpbacked. If something is separatist then it is unrealised. If Tremaine is humpbacked then Tremaine is dosed. Tremaine is unrealised.", "logic": "\nDosed(lawton)\nHumpbacked(lawton)\nDosed(tremaine)\nBearing(tremaine)\nDosed(stanly)\nBearing(angel)\nSeparatist(angel)\nforall x (Given(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Unrealised(x) and Humpbacked(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) and Humpbacked(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Given(x) -> Unrealised(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Unrealised(x))\nHumpbacked(tremaine) -> Dosed(tremaine)\n\nUnrealised(tremaine)\n\nDosed(tremaine) and forall x (Dosed(x) -> Humpbacked(x)) -> therefore Humpbacked(tremaine) Dosed(tremaine) and Humpbacked(tremaine) and forall x (Dosed(x) and Humpbacked(x) -> Separatist(x)) -> therefore Separatist(tremaine) Separatist(tremaine) and forall x (Separatist(x) -> Unrealised(x)) -> therefore Unrealised(tremaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Leigh is grimy. Leigh is volar. Bernadene is grimy. Bernadene is furtive. Gamaliel is grimy. Leanne is furtive. Leanne is handsome. All dissolute things are handsome. If something is sessile and volar then it is handsome. If something is grimy and volar then it is handsome. Round things are volar. All dissolute things are sessile. All grimy things are volar. If something is handsome then it is sessile. If Bernadene is volar then Bernadene is grimy. Bernadene is not sessile.", "logic": "\nGrimy(leigh)\nVolar(leigh)\nGrimy(bernadene)\nFurtive(bernadene)\nGrimy(gamaliel)\nFurtive(leanne)\nHandsome(leanne)\nforall x (Dissolute(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Sessile(x) and Volar(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Grimy(x) and Volar(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Handsome(x) -> Volar(x))\nforall x (Dissolute(x) -> Sessile(x))\nforall x (Grimy(x) -> Volar(x))\nforall x (Handsome(x) -> Sessile(x))\nVolar(bernadene) -> Grimy(bernadene)\n\nnot Sessile(bernadene)\n\nGrimy(bernadene) and forall x (Grimy(x) -> Volar(x)) -> therefore Volar(bernadene) Grimy(bernadene) and Volar(bernadene) and forall x (Grimy(x) and Volar(x) -> Handsome(x)) -> therefore Handsome(bernadene) Handsome(bernadene) and forall x (Handsome(x) -> Sessile(x)) -> therefore Sessile(bernadene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Hyatt is prior. Hyatt is umbellate. Chevy is prior. Chevy is barefaced. Ange is prior. Laurena is barefaced. Laurena is podgy. All illusive things are podgy. If something is antiblack and umbellate then it is podgy. If something is prior and umbellate then it is podgy. Round things are umbellate. All illusive things are antiblack. All prior things are umbellate. If something is podgy then it is antiblack. If Chevy is umbellate then Chevy is prior. Ange is not barefaced.", "logic": "\nPrior(hyatt)\nUmbellate(hyatt)\nPrior(chevy)\nBarefaced(chevy)\nPrior(ange)\nBarefaced(laurena)\nPodgy(laurena)\nforall x (Illusive(x) -> Podgy(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Podgy(x))\nforall x (Prior(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Podgy(x))\nforall x (Podgy(x) -> Umbellate(x))\nforall x (Illusive(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nforall x (Prior(x) -> Umbellate(x))\nforall x (Podgy(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nUmbellate(chevy) -> Prior(chevy)\n\nnot Barefaced(ange)\n\nnot Barefaced(ange) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Geraldine is mutative. Geraldine is undraped. Cacilia is mutative. Cacilia is antiphonal. Roshelle is mutative. Andria is antiphonal. Andria is upper. All centennial things are upper. If something is cuspidal and undraped then it is upper. If something is mutative and undraped then it is upper. Round things are undraped. All centennial things are cuspidal. All mutative things are undraped. If something is upper then it is cuspidal. If Cacilia is undraped then Cacilia is mutative. Geraldine is centennial.", "logic": "\nMutative(geraldine)\nUndraped(geraldine)\nMutative(cacilia)\nAntiphonal(cacilia)\nMutative(roshelle)\nAntiphonal(andria)\nUpper(andria)\nforall x (Centennial(x) -> Upper(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Undraped(x) -> Upper(x))\nforall x (Mutative(x) and Undraped(x) -> Upper(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Centennial(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Mutative(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nUndraped(cacilia) -> Mutative(cacilia)\n\nCentennial(geraldine)\n\nCentennial(geraldine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Augie is trivial. Augie is phrenic. Jehu is trivial. Jehu is symbiotic. Darin is trivial. Elden is symbiotic. Elden is ecological. All uncial things are ecological. If something is persuasive and phrenic then it is ecological. If something is trivial and phrenic then it is ecological. Round things are phrenic. All uncial things are persuasive. All trivial things are phrenic. If something is ecological then it is persuasive. If Jehu is phrenic then Jehu is trivial. Jehu is not uncial.", "logic": "\nTrivial(augie)\nPhrenic(augie)\nTrivial(jehu)\nSymbiotic(jehu)\nTrivial(darin)\nSymbiotic(elden)\nEcological(elden)\nforall x (Uncial(x) -> Ecological(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) and Phrenic(x) -> Ecological(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Phrenic(x) -> Ecological(x))\nforall x (Ecological(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Uncial(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Ecological(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nPhrenic(jehu) -> Trivial(jehu)\n\nnot Uncial(jehu)\n\nnot Uncial(jehu) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Arlyn is frothing. Arlyn is debonnaire. Morlee is frothing. Morlee is chitinous. Poul is frothing. Alvin is chitinous. Alvin is demented. All thenal things are demented. If something is untutored and debonnaire then it is demented. If something is frothing and debonnaire then it is demented. Round things are debonnaire. All thenal things are untutored. All frothing things are debonnaire. If something is demented then it is untutored. If Morlee is debonnaire then Morlee is frothing. Poul is thenal.", "logic": "\nFrothing(arlyn)\nDebonnaire(arlyn)\nFrothing(morlee)\nChitinous(morlee)\nFrothing(poul)\nChitinous(alvin)\nDemented(alvin)\nforall x (Thenal(x) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Untutored(x) and Debonnaire(x) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Frothing(x) and Debonnaire(x) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Demented(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\nforall x (Thenal(x) -> Untutored(x))\nforall x (Frothing(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\nforall x (Demented(x) -> Untutored(x))\nDebonnaire(morlee) -> Frothing(morlee)\n\nThenal(poul)\n\nThenal(poul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Tito is seedy. Tito is salacious. Trace is seedy. Trace is tense. Herby is seedy. Jobi is tense. Jobi is diffusing. All grassroots things are diffusing. If something is experient and salacious then it is diffusing. If something is seedy and salacious then it is diffusing. Round things are salacious. All grassroots things are experient. All seedy things are salacious. If something is diffusing then it is experient. If Trace is salacious then Trace is seedy. Tito is not kind.", "logic": "\nSeedy(tito)\nSalacious(tito)\nSeedy(trace)\nTense(trace)\nSeedy(herby)\nTense(jobi)\nDiffusing(jobi)\nforall x (Grassroots(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nforall x (Experient(x) and Salacious(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nforall x (Seedy(x) and Salacious(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nforall x (Diffusing(x) -> Salacious(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) -> Experient(x))\nforall x (Seedy(x) -> Salacious(x))\nforall x (Diffusing(x) -> Experient(x))\nSalacious(trace) -> Seedy(trace)\n\nnot Kind(tito)\n\nnot Kind(tito) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Nathalie is unhopeful. Nathalie is obviating. Meggan is unhopeful. Meggan is orthogonal. Paulo is unhopeful. Merell is orthogonal. Merell is sneezy. All gruff things are sneezy. If something is anionic and obviating then it is sneezy. If something is unhopeful and obviating then it is sneezy. Round things are obviating. All gruff things are anionic. All unhopeful things are obviating. If something is sneezy then it is anionic. If Meggan is obviating then Meggan is unhopeful. Meggan is kind.", "logic": "\nUnhopeful(nathalie)\nObviating(nathalie)\nUnhopeful(meggan)\nOrthogonal(meggan)\nUnhopeful(paulo)\nOrthogonal(merell)\nSneezy(merell)\nforall x (Gruff(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Anionic(x) and Obviating(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) and Obviating(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Gruff(x) -> Anionic(x))\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Anionic(x))\nObviating(meggan) -> Unhopeful(meggan)\n\nKind(meggan)\n\nKind(meggan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Herculie is scarred. Herculie is centrist. Shauna is scarred. Shauna is unfertile. Lucie is scarred. Rodge is unfertile. Rodge is octal. All luscious things are octal. If something is cobwebby and centrist then it is octal. If something is scarred and centrist then it is octal. Round things are centrist. All luscious things are cobwebby. All scarred things are centrist. If something is octal then it is cobwebby. If Shauna is centrist then Shauna is scarred. Herculie is not unfertile.", "logic": "\nScarred(herculie)\nCentrist(herculie)\nScarred(shauna)\nUnfertile(shauna)\nScarred(lucie)\nUnfertile(rodge)\nOctal(rodge)\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> Octal(x))\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) and Centrist(x) -> Octal(x))\nforall x (Scarred(x) and Centrist(x) -> Octal(x))\nforall x (Octal(x) -> Centrist(x))\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\nforall x (Scarred(x) -> Centrist(x))\nforall x (Octal(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\nCentrist(shauna) -> Scarred(shauna)\n\nnot Unfertile(herculie)\n\nnot Unfertile(herculie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Keelia is bibulous. Keelia is liable. Elias is bibulous. Elias is nethermost. Pauline is bibulous. Ricki is nethermost. Ricki is paniculate. All drawn things are paniculate. If something is bermudan and liable then it is paniculate. If something is bibulous and liable then it is paniculate. Round things are liable. All drawn things are bermudan. All bibulous things are liable. If something is paniculate then it is bermudan. If Elias is liable then Elias is bibulous. Ricki is kind.", "logic": "\nBibulous(keelia)\nLiable(keelia)\nBibulous(elias)\nNethermost(elias)\nBibulous(pauline)\nNethermost(ricki)\nPaniculate(ricki)\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Paniculate(x))\nforall x (Bermudan(x) and Liable(x) -> Paniculate(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) and Liable(x) -> Paniculate(x))\nforall x (Paniculate(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Bermudan(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Paniculate(x) -> Bermudan(x))\nLiable(elias) -> Bibulous(elias)\n\nKind(ricki)\n\nKind(ricki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "The kirbee does not like the goldarina. The goldarina ensky the prisca. The prisca is expositive. If someone is unhealed then they like the kirbee. If someone is expositive then they like the kirbee. If someone is expositive and not bubbling then they are fuzzed. If someone understudy the kirbee then the kirbee ensky the prisca. If the prisca is expositive then the prisca understudy the kirbee. If the kirbee ensky the prisca then the prisca understudy the goldarina. The kirbee does not like the goldarina.", "logic": "\nnot Understudy(kirbee, goldarina)\nEnsky(goldarina, prisca)\nExpositive(prisca)\nforall x (Unhealed(x) -> Understudy(x, kirbee))\nforall x (Expositive(x) -> Understudy(x, kirbee))\nforall x (Expositive(x) and not Bubbling(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Understudy(x, kirbee) -> Ensky(kirbee, prisca))\nExpositive(prisca) -> Understudy(prisca, kirbee)\nEnsky(kirbee, prisca) -> Understudy(prisca, goldarina)\n\nnot Understudy(kirbee, goldarina)\n\ntherefore not Understudy(kirbee, goldarina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The randa does not like the jessi. The jessi comminate the isidore. The isidore is choky. If someone is cloudless then they like the randa. If someone is choky then they like the randa. If someone is choky and not vicennial then they are meaty. If someone latinise the randa then the randa comminate the isidore. If the isidore is choky then the isidore latinise the randa. If the randa comminate the isidore then the isidore latinise the jessi. The randa latinise the jessi.", "logic": "\nnot Latinise(randa, jessi)\nComminate(jessi, isidore)\nChoky(isidore)\nforall x (Cloudless(x) -> Latinise(x, randa))\nforall x (Choky(x) -> Latinise(x, randa))\nforall x (Choky(x) and not Vicennial(x) -> Meaty(x))\nforall x (Latinise(x, randa) -> Comminate(randa, isidore))\nChoky(isidore) -> Latinise(isidore, randa)\nComminate(randa, isidore) -> Latinise(isidore, jessi)\n\nLatinise(randa, jessi)\n\ntherefore not Latinise(randa, jessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The cecile does not like the hewett. The hewett jolt the kordula. The kordula is impolite. If someone is animating then they like the cecile. If someone is impolite then they like the cecile. If someone is impolite and not pocketable then they are hoarse. If someone levy the cecile then the cecile jolt the kordula. If the kordula is impolite then the kordula levy the cecile. If the cecile jolt the kordula then the kordula levy the hewett. The kordula levy the cecile.", "logic": "\nnot Levy(cecile, hewett)\nJolt(hewett, kordula)\nImpolite(kordula)\nforall x (Animating(x) -> Levy(x, cecile))\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Levy(x, cecile))\nforall x (Impolite(x) and not Pocketable(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nforall x (Levy(x, cecile) -> Jolt(cecile, kordula))\nImpolite(kordula) -> Levy(kordula, cecile)\nJolt(cecile, kordula) -> Levy(kordula, hewett)\n\nLevy(kordula, cecile)\n\nImpolite(kordula) and forall x (Impolite(x) -> Levy(x, cecile)) -> therefore Levy(kordula, cecile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The staford does not like the glynn. The glynn convince the godard. The godard is archaean. If someone is twisted then they like the staford. If someone is archaean then they like the staford. If someone is archaean and not undersea then they are dreamy. If someone wriggle the staford then the staford convince the godard. If the godard is archaean then the godard wriggle the staford. If the staford convince the godard then the godard wriggle the glynn. The godard does not like the staford.", "logic": "\nnot Wriggle(staford, glynn)\nConvince(glynn, godard)\nArchaean(godard)\nforall x (Twisted(x) -> Wriggle(x, staford))\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Wriggle(x, staford))\nforall x (Archaean(x) and not Undersea(x) -> Dreamy(x))\nforall x (Wriggle(x, staford) -> Convince(staford, godard))\nArchaean(godard) -> Wriggle(godard, staford)\nConvince(staford, godard) -> Wriggle(godard, glynn)\n\nnot Wriggle(godard, staford)\n\nArchaean(godard) and forall x (Archaean(x) -> Wriggle(x, staford)) -> therefore Wriggle(godard, staford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The royal does not like the madel. The madel unwire the niall. The niall is blotched. If someone is ulcerated then they like the royal. If someone is blotched then they like the royal. If someone is blotched and not parametric then they are blamed. If someone reword the royal then the royal unwire the niall. If the niall is blotched then the niall reword the royal. If the royal unwire the niall then the niall reword the madel. The royal unwire the niall.", "logic": "\nnot Reword(royal, madel)\nUnwire(madel, niall)\nBlotched(niall)\nforall x (Ulcerated(x) -> Reword(x, royal))\nforall x (Blotched(x) -> Reword(x, royal))\nforall x (Blotched(x) and not Parametric(x) -> Blamed(x))\nforall x (Reword(x, royal) -> Unwire(royal, niall))\nBlotched(niall) -> Reword(niall, royal)\nUnwire(royal, niall) -> Reword(niall, madel)\n\nUnwire(royal, niall)\n\nBlotched(niall) and forall x (Blotched(x) -> Reword(x, royal)) -> therefore Reword(niall, royal) Reword(niall, royal) and forall x (Reword(x, royal) -> Unwire(royal, niall)) -> therefore Unwire(royal, niall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The petunia does not like the leda. The leda imbed the armand. The armand is biaxial. If someone is bitter then they like the petunia. If someone is biaxial then they like the petunia. If someone is biaxial and not evanescent then they are referent. If someone disinter the petunia then the petunia imbed the armand. If the armand is biaxial then the armand disinter the petunia. If the petunia imbed the armand then the armand disinter the leda. The petunia does not chase the armand.", "logic": "\nnot Disinter(petunia, leda)\nImbed(leda, armand)\nBiaxial(armand)\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Disinter(x, petunia))\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Disinter(x, petunia))\nforall x (Biaxial(x) and not Evanescent(x) -> Referent(x))\nforall x (Disinter(x, petunia) -> Imbed(petunia, armand))\nBiaxial(armand) -> Disinter(armand, petunia)\nImbed(petunia, armand) -> Disinter(armand, leda)\n\nnot Imbed(petunia, armand)\n\nBiaxial(armand) and forall x (Biaxial(x) -> Disinter(x, petunia)) -> therefore Disinter(armand, petunia) Disinter(armand, petunia) and forall x (Disinter(x, petunia) -> Imbed(petunia, armand)) -> therefore Imbed(petunia, armand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The vida does not like the clovis. The clovis oppose the garfinkel. The garfinkel is grassroots. If someone is diminuendo then they like the vida. If someone is grassroots then they like the vida. If someone is grassroots and not reverting then they are infuriated. If someone thaw the vida then the vida oppose the garfinkel. If the garfinkel is grassroots then the garfinkel thaw the vida. If the vida oppose the garfinkel then the garfinkel thaw the clovis. The garfinkel thaw the clovis.", "logic": "\nnot Thaw(vida, clovis)\nOppose(clovis, garfinkel)\nGrassroots(garfinkel)\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Thaw(x, vida))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) -> Thaw(x, vida))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) and not Reverting(x) -> Infuriated(x))\nforall x (Thaw(x, vida) -> Oppose(vida, garfinkel))\nGrassroots(garfinkel) -> Thaw(garfinkel, vida)\nOppose(vida, garfinkel) -> Thaw(garfinkel, clovis)\n\nThaw(garfinkel, clovis)\n\nGrassroots(garfinkel) and forall x (Grassroots(x) -> Thaw(x, vida)) -> therefore Thaw(garfinkel, vida) Thaw(garfinkel, vida) and forall x (Thaw(x, vida) -> Oppose(vida, garfinkel)) -> therefore Oppose(vida, garfinkel) Oppose(vida, garfinkel) and Oppose(vida, garfinkel) -> Thaw(garfinkel, clovis) -> therefore Thaw(garfinkel, clovis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The darius does not like the krishna. The krishna prove the lotti. The lotti is aglow. If someone is drastic then they like the darius. If someone is aglow then they like the darius. If someone is aglow and not bipolar then they are splayfoot. If someone imbed the darius then the darius prove the lotti. If the lotti is aglow then the lotti imbed the darius. If the darius prove the lotti then the lotti imbed the krishna. The lotti does not like the krishna.", "logic": "\nnot Imbed(darius, krishna)\nProve(krishna, lotti)\nAglow(lotti)\nforall x (Drastic(x) -> Imbed(x, darius))\nforall x (Aglow(x) -> Imbed(x, darius))\nforall x (Aglow(x) and not Bipolar(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\nforall x (Imbed(x, darius) -> Prove(darius, lotti))\nAglow(lotti) -> Imbed(lotti, darius)\nProve(darius, lotti) -> Imbed(lotti, krishna)\n\nnot Imbed(lotti, krishna)\n\nAglow(lotti) and forall x (Aglow(x) -> Imbed(x, darius)) -> therefore Imbed(lotti, darius) Imbed(lotti, darius) and forall x (Imbed(x, darius) -> Prove(darius, lotti)) -> therefore Prove(darius, lotti) Prove(darius, lotti) and Prove(darius, lotti) -> Imbed(lotti, krishna) -> therefore Imbed(lotti, krishna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The doralin does not like the augie. The augie swipe the urbano. The urbano is spotty. If someone is lightproof then they like the doralin. If someone is spotty then they like the doralin. If someone is spotty and not undreamed then they are mediatory. If someone subject the doralin then the doralin swipe the urbano. If the urbano is spotty then the urbano subject the doralin. If the doralin swipe the urbano then the urbano subject the augie. The doralin does not like the doralin.", "logic": "\nnot Subject(doralin, augie)\nSwipe(augie, urbano)\nSpotty(urbano)\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Subject(x, doralin))\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Subject(x, doralin))\nforall x (Spotty(x) and not Undreamed(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nforall x (Subject(x, doralin) -> Swipe(doralin, urbano))\nSpotty(urbano) -> Subject(urbano, doralin)\nSwipe(doralin, urbano) -> Subject(urbano, augie)\n\nnot Subject(doralin, doralin)\n\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Subject(x, doralin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The rosanna does not like the madelle. The madelle walk the ardyth. The ardyth is thumbed. If someone is asterisked then they like the rosanna. If someone is thumbed then they like the rosanna. If someone is thumbed and not direct then they are cloying. If someone excerpt the rosanna then the rosanna walk the ardyth. If the ardyth is thumbed then the ardyth excerpt the rosanna. If the rosanna walk the ardyth then the ardyth excerpt the madelle. The rosanna is cloying.", "logic": "\nnot Excerpt(rosanna, madelle)\nWalk(madelle, ardyth)\nThumbed(ardyth)\nforall x (Asterisked(x) -> Excerpt(x, rosanna))\nforall x (Thumbed(x) -> Excerpt(x, rosanna))\nforall x (Thumbed(x) and not Direct(x) -> Cloying(x))\nforall x (Excerpt(x, rosanna) -> Walk(rosanna, ardyth))\nThumbed(ardyth) -> Excerpt(ardyth, rosanna)\nWalk(rosanna, ardyth) -> Excerpt(ardyth, madelle)\n\nCloying(rosanna)\n\nforall x (Thumbed(x) and not Direct(x) -> Cloying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The saraann does not like the aggie. The aggie sensualise the jannelle. The jannelle is indian. If someone is epigastric then they like the saraann. If someone is indian then they like the saraann. If someone is indian and not homosexual then they are onshore. If someone weightlift the saraann then the saraann sensualise the jannelle. If the jannelle is indian then the jannelle weightlift the saraann. If the saraann sensualise the jannelle then the jannelle weightlift the aggie. The aggie is not onshore.", "logic": "\nnot Weightlift(saraann, aggie)\nSensualise(aggie, jannelle)\nIndian(jannelle)\nforall x (Epigastric(x) -> Weightlift(x, saraann))\nforall x (Indian(x) -> Weightlift(x, saraann))\nforall x (Indian(x) and not Homosexual(x) -> Onshore(x))\nforall x (Weightlift(x, saraann) -> Sensualise(saraann, jannelle))\nIndian(jannelle) -> Weightlift(jannelle, saraann)\nSensualise(saraann, jannelle) -> Weightlift(jannelle, aggie)\n\nnot Onshore(aggie)\n\nforall x (Indian(x) and not Homosexual(x) -> Onshore(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The halley does not like the rivi. The rivi ozonise the stern. The stern is footsure. If someone is unshaved then they like the halley. If someone is footsure then they like the halley. If someone is footsure and not hatched then they are binate. If someone behove the halley then the halley ozonise the stern. If the stern is footsure then the stern behove the halley. If the halley ozonise the stern then the stern behove the rivi. The stern is binate.", "logic": "\nnot Behove(halley, rivi)\nOzonise(rivi, stern)\nFootsure(stern)\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Behove(x, halley))\nforall x (Footsure(x) -> Behove(x, halley))\nforall x (Footsure(x) and not Hatched(x) -> Binate(x))\nforall x (Behove(x, halley) -> Ozonise(halley, stern))\nFootsure(stern) -> Behove(stern, halley)\nOzonise(halley, stern) -> Behove(stern, rivi)\n\nBinate(stern)\n\nforall x (Footsure(x) and not Hatched(x) -> Binate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The dianna does not like the leonanie. The leonanie counteract the colly. The colly is andalusian. If someone is reeking then they like the dianna. If someone is andalusian then they like the dianna. If someone is andalusian and not maiden then they are delighted. If someone shamanise the dianna then the dianna counteract the colly. If the colly is andalusian then the colly shamanise the dianna. If the dianna counteract the colly then the colly shamanise the leonanie. The leonanie is not nice.", "logic": "\nnot Shamanise(dianna, leonanie)\nCounteract(leonanie, colly)\nAndalusian(colly)\nforall x (Reeking(x) -> Shamanise(x, dianna))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> Shamanise(x, dianna))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and not Maiden(x) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Shamanise(x, dianna) -> Counteract(dianna, colly))\nAndalusian(colly) -> Shamanise(colly, dianna)\nCounteract(dianna, colly) -> Shamanise(colly, leonanie)\n\nnot Nice(leonanie)\n\nnot Nice(leonanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The solly does not like the mauritz. The mauritz suspire the antoni. The antoni is metal. If someone is adapted then they like the solly. If someone is metal then they like the solly. If someone is metal and not braggy then they are erring. If someone penetrate the solly then the solly suspire the antoni. If the antoni is metal then the antoni penetrate the solly. If the solly suspire the antoni then the antoni penetrate the mauritz. The mauritz sees the solly.", "logic": "\nnot Penetrate(solly, mauritz)\nSuspire(mauritz, antoni)\nMetal(antoni)\nforall x (Adapted(x) -> Penetrate(x, solly))\nforall x (Metal(x) -> Penetrate(x, solly))\nforall x (Metal(x) and not Braggy(x) -> Erring(x))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, solly) -> Suspire(solly, antoni))\nMetal(antoni) -> Penetrate(antoni, solly)\nSuspire(solly, antoni) -> Penetrate(antoni, mauritz)\n\nSees(mauritz, solly)\n\nSees(mauritz, solly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The kin does not like the catharine. The catharine bicycle the fox. The fox is ghostly. If someone is baboonish then they like the kin. If someone is ghostly then they like the kin. If someone is ghostly and not odourless then they are eukaryotic. If someone resubmit the kin then the kin bicycle the fox. If the fox is ghostly then the fox resubmit the kin. If the kin bicycle the fox then the fox resubmit the catharine. The catharine is not baboonish.", "logic": "\nnot Resubmit(kin, catharine)\nBicycle(catharine, fox)\nGhostly(fox)\nforall x (Baboonish(x) -> Resubmit(x, kin))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Resubmit(x, kin))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) and not Odourless(x) -> Eukaryotic(x))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, kin) -> Bicycle(kin, fox))\nGhostly(fox) -> Resubmit(fox, kin)\nBicycle(kin, fox) -> Resubmit(fox, catharine)\n\nnot Baboonish(catharine)\n\nnot Baboonish(catharine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The kylie does not like the jena. The jena introvert the kari. The kari is metaphoric. If someone is orbicular then they like the kylie. If someone is metaphoric then they like the kylie. If someone is metaphoric and not lunate then they are declared. If someone level the kylie then the kylie introvert the kari. If the kari is metaphoric then the kari level the kylie. If the kylie introvert the kari then the kari level the jena. The kari introvert the kylie.", "logic": "\nnot Level(kylie, jena)\nIntrovert(jena, kari)\nMetaphoric(kari)\nforall x (Orbicular(x) -> Level(x, kylie))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Level(x, kylie))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) and not Lunate(x) -> Declared(x))\nforall x (Level(x, kylie) -> Introvert(kylie, kari))\nMetaphoric(kari) -> Level(kari, kylie)\nIntrovert(kylie, kari) -> Level(kari, jena)\n\nIntrovert(kari, kylie)\n\nIntrovert(kari, kylie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "Solly is gluey. Flem is botonee. If someone is gluey and buteonine then they are botonee. If someone is underwater then they are cancellous. If someone is botonee then they are gluey. If someone is gluey then they are buteonine. If someone is buteonine and gluey then they are sloppy. Kind, cancellous people are botonee. Flem is botonee.", "logic": "\nGluey(solly)\nBotonee(flem)\nforall x (Gluey(x) and Buteonine(x) -> Botonee(x))\nforall x (Underwater(x) -> Cancellous(x))\nforall x (Botonee(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Gluey(x) -> Buteonine(x))\nforall x (Buteonine(x) and Gluey(x) -> Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Gluey(x) and Cancellous(x) -> Botonee(x))\n\nBotonee(flem)\n\ntherefore Botonee(flem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Osbert is smoking. Ginny is broody. If someone is smoking and preachy then they are broody. If someone is aeschylean then they are primal. If someone is broody then they are smoking. If someone is smoking then they are preachy. If someone is preachy and smoking then they are subdued. Kind, primal people are broody. Ginny is not broody.", "logic": "\nSmoking(osbert)\nBroody(ginny)\nforall x (Smoking(x) and Preachy(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) -> Primal(x))\nforall x (Broody(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) -> Preachy(x))\nforall x (Preachy(x) and Smoking(x) -> Subdued(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) and Primal(x) -> Broody(x))\n\nnot Broody(ginny)\n\ntherefore Broody(ginny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Warner is manifest. Richmond is hardy. If someone is manifest and sadistic then they are hardy. If someone is delible then they are squeaky. If someone is hardy then they are manifest. If someone is manifest then they are sadistic. If someone is sadistic and manifest then they are fatheaded. Kind, squeaky people are hardy. Richmond is manifest.", "logic": "\nManifest(warner)\nHardy(richmond)\nforall x (Manifest(x) and Sadistic(x) -> Hardy(x))\nforall x (Delible(x) -> Squeaky(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Manifest(x) -> Fatheaded(x))\nforall x (Manifest(x) and Squeaky(x) -> Hardy(x))\n\nManifest(richmond)\n\nHardy(richmond) and forall x (Hardy(x) -> Manifest(x)) -> therefore Manifest(richmond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Bessie is anarchic. Marinna is adjusted. If someone is anarchic and chasidic then they are adjusted. If someone is wolfish then they are inhuman. If someone is adjusted then they are anarchic. If someone is anarchic then they are chasidic. If someone is chasidic and anarchic then they are cismontane. Kind, inhuman people are adjusted. Bessie is not chasidic.", "logic": "\nAnarchic(bessie)\nAdjusted(marinna)\nforall x (Anarchic(x) and Chasidic(x) -> Adjusted(x))\nforall x (Wolfish(x) -> Inhuman(x))\nforall x (Adjusted(x) -> Anarchic(x))\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Chasidic(x))\nforall x (Chasidic(x) and Anarchic(x) -> Cismontane(x))\nforall x (Anarchic(x) and Inhuman(x) -> Adjusted(x))\n\nnot Chasidic(bessie)\n\nAnarchic(bessie) and forall x (Anarchic(x) -> Chasidic(x)) -> therefore Chasidic(bessie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Tildi is carefree. Rebekkah is meshugge. If someone is carefree and unadorned then they are meshugge. If someone is protrusile then they are metacarpal. If someone is meshugge then they are carefree. If someone is carefree then they are unadorned. If someone is unadorned and carefree then they are guileful. Kind, metacarpal people are meshugge. Tildi is meshugge.", "logic": "\nCarefree(tildi)\nMeshugge(rebekkah)\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Unadorned(x) -> Meshugge(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Meshugge(x) -> Carefree(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Unadorned(x))\nforall x (Unadorned(x) and Carefree(x) -> Guileful(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Metacarpal(x) -> Meshugge(x))\n\nMeshugge(tildi)\n\nCarefree(tildi) and forall x (Carefree(x) -> Unadorned(x)) -> therefore Unadorned(tildi) Carefree(tildi) and Unadorned(tildi) and forall x (Carefree(x) and Unadorned(x) -> Meshugge(x)) -> therefore Meshugge(tildi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Maryrose is afghani. Mayor is agelong. If someone is afghani and uncleanly then they are agelong. If someone is touristy then they are deceased. If someone is agelong then they are afghani. If someone is afghani then they are uncleanly. If someone is uncleanly and afghani then they are senescent. Kind, deceased people are agelong. Mayor is not uncleanly.", "logic": "\nAfghani(maryrose)\nAgelong(mayor)\nforall x (Afghani(x) and Uncleanly(x) -> Agelong(x))\nforall x (Touristy(x) -> Deceased(x))\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Afghani(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) and Afghani(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) and Deceased(x) -> Agelong(x))\n\nnot Uncleanly(mayor)\n\nAgelong(mayor) and forall x (Agelong(x) -> Afghani(x)) -> therefore Afghani(mayor) Afghani(mayor) and forall x (Afghani(x) -> Uncleanly(x)) -> therefore Uncleanly(mayor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Cabrina is cancerous. Timmi is nicene. If someone is cancerous and superfine then they are nicene. If someone is refreshful then they are salted. If someone is nicene then they are cancerous. If someone is cancerous then they are superfine. If someone is superfine and cancerous then they are delusory. Kind, salted people are nicene. Timmi is delusory.", "logic": "\nCancerous(cabrina)\nNicene(timmi)\nforall x (Cancerous(x) and Superfine(x) -> Nicene(x))\nforall x (Refreshful(x) -> Salted(x))\nforall x (Nicene(x) -> Cancerous(x))\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Superfine(x) and Cancerous(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Cancerous(x) and Salted(x) -> Nicene(x))\n\nDelusory(timmi)\n\nNicene(timmi) and forall x (Nicene(x) -> Cancerous(x)) -> therefore Cancerous(timmi) Cancerous(timmi) and forall x (Cancerous(x) -> Superfine(x)) -> therefore Superfine(timmi) Nicene(timmi) and forall x (Nicene(x) -> Cancerous(x)) -> therefore Cancerous(timmi) Superfine(timmi) and Cancerous(timmi) and forall x (Superfine(x) and Cancerous(x) -> Delusory(x)) -> therefore Delusory(timmi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Honor is lowborn. Candy is huxleyan. If someone is lowborn and uncured then they are huxleyan. If someone is demoniac then they are unchained. If someone is huxleyan then they are lowborn. If someone is lowborn then they are uncured. If someone is uncured and lowborn then they are astomatal. Kind, unchained people are huxleyan. Candy is not astomatal.", "logic": "\nLowborn(honor)\nHuxleyan(candy)\nforall x (Lowborn(x) and Uncured(x) -> Huxleyan(x))\nforall x (Demoniac(x) -> Unchained(x))\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) -> Lowborn(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Uncured(x))\nforall x (Uncured(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Astomatal(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) and Unchained(x) -> Huxleyan(x))\n\nnot Astomatal(candy)\n\nHuxleyan(candy) and forall x (Huxleyan(x) -> Lowborn(x)) -> therefore Lowborn(candy) Lowborn(candy) and forall x (Lowborn(x) -> Uncured(x)) -> therefore Uncured(candy) Huxleyan(candy) and forall x (Huxleyan(x) -> Lowborn(x)) -> therefore Lowborn(candy) Uncured(candy) and Lowborn(candy) and forall x (Uncured(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Astomatal(x)) -> therefore Astomatal(candy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Alyce is rupicolous. Jacob is velar. If someone is rupicolous and aboveboard then they are velar. If someone is bichrome then they are detested. If someone is velar then they are rupicolous. If someone is rupicolous then they are aboveboard. If someone is aboveboard and rupicolous then they are bacillary. Kind, detested people are velar. Jacob is not detested.", "logic": "\nRupicolous(alyce)\nVelar(jacob)\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) and Aboveboard(x) -> Velar(x))\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Velar(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) and Rupicolous(x) -> Bacillary(x))\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) and Detested(x) -> Velar(x))\n\nnot Detested(jacob)\n\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> Detested(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Mavra is homonymic. Abagael is unraised. If someone is homonymic and centralist then they are unraised. If someone is paired then they are lightsome. If someone is unraised then they are homonymic. If someone is homonymic then they are centralist. If someone is centralist and homonymic then they are fervid. Kind, lightsome people are unraised. Mavra is lightsome.", "logic": "\nHomonymic(mavra)\nUnraised(abagael)\nforall x (Homonymic(x) and Centralist(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> Homonymic(x))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> Centralist(x))\nforall x (Centralist(x) and Homonymic(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) and Lightsome(x) -> Unraised(x))\n\nLightsome(mavra)\n\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Lightsome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Donella is pagan. Milli is according. If someone is pagan and acting then they are according. If someone is maniacal then they are attached. If someone is according then they are pagan. If someone is pagan then they are acting. If someone is acting and pagan then they are aerolitic. Kind, attached people are according. Donella is not maniacal.", "logic": "\nPagan(donella)\nAccording(milli)\nforall x (Pagan(x) and Acting(x) -> According(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (According(x) -> Pagan(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) -> Acting(x))\nforall x (Acting(x) and Pagan(x) -> Aerolitic(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) and Attached(x) -> According(x))\n\nnot Maniacal(donella)\n\nnot Maniacal(donella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Oren is exogenic. Michelina is gonadal. If someone is exogenic and scalable then they are gonadal. If someone is bigger then they are northward. If someone is gonadal then they are exogenic. If someone is exogenic then they are scalable. If someone is scalable and exogenic then they are grand. Kind, northward people are gonadal. Michelina is cold.", "logic": "\nExogenic(oren)\nGonadal(michelina)\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Scalable(x) -> Gonadal(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Northward(x))\nforall x (Gonadal(x) -> Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Scalable(x) and Exogenic(x) -> Grand(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Northward(x) -> Gonadal(x))\n\nCold(michelina)\n\nCold(michelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Bella is anorthitic. Bel is mono. If someone is anorthitic and evocative then they are mono. If someone is arbitrary then they are homesick. If someone is mono then they are anorthitic. If someone is anorthitic then they are evocative. If someone is evocative and anorthitic then they are advertised. Kind, homesick people are mono. Bella is not cold.", "logic": "\nAnorthitic(bella)\nMono(bel)\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) and Evocative(x) -> Mono(x))\nforall x (Arbitrary(x) -> Homesick(x))\nforall x (Mono(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Evocative(x) and Anorthitic(x) -> Advertised(x))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) and Homesick(x) -> Mono(x))\n\nnot Cold(bella)\n\nnot Cold(bella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Jessamine is ringlike. Florette is brumal. If someone is ringlike and variolar then they are brumal. If someone is paralytic then they are gusseted. If someone is brumal then they are ringlike. If someone is ringlike then they are variolar. If someone is variolar and ringlike then they are cupular. Kind, gusseted people are brumal. Florette is paralytic.", "logic": "\nRinglike(jessamine)\nBrumal(florette)\nforall x (Ringlike(x) and Variolar(x) -> Brumal(x))\nforall x (Paralytic(x) -> Gusseted(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Ringlike(x))\nforall x (Ringlike(x) -> Variolar(x))\nforall x (Variolar(x) and Ringlike(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Ringlike(x) and Gusseted(x) -> Brumal(x))\n\nParalytic(florette)\n\nParalytic(florette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "The tamara plane the erek. The tamara subluxate the erek. The erek plane the tamara. If something plane the erek then it is diluvial. If something is diluvial then it subluxate the tamara. If something subluxate the tamara and the tamara does not chase the erek then it does not chase the tamara. If something plane the tamara then it does not visit the erek. If something subluxate the tamara and the tamara plane the erek then the erek subluxate the tamara. If something plane the tamara and the tamara plane the erek then it does not visit the tamara. If something plane the tamara and the tamara does not visit the erek then the tamara is not unmusical. If the tamara does not see the erek and the erek does not chase the tamara then the tamara is mucose. The erek plane the tamara.", "logic": "\nPlane(tamara, erek)\nSubluxate(tamara, erek)\nPlane(erek, tamara)\nforall x (Plane(x, erek) -> Diluvial(x))\nforall x (Diluvial(x) -> Subluxate(x, tamara))\nforall x (Subluxate(x, tamara) and not Plane(tamara, erek) -> not Plane(x, tamara))\nforall x (Plane(x, tamara) -> not Embitter(x, erek))\nforall x (Subluxate(x, tamara) and Plane(tamara, erek) -> Subluxate(erek, tamara))\nforall x (Plane(x, tamara) and Plane(tamara, erek) -> not Embitter(x, tamara))\nforall x (Plane(x, tamara) and not Embitter(tamara, erek) -> not Unmusical(tamara))\nnot Subluxate(tamara, erek) and not Plane(erek, tamara) -> Mucose(tamara)\n\nPlane(erek, tamara)\n\ntherefore Plane(erek, tamara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The cherise attribute the pearla. The cherise posture the pearla. The pearla attribute the cherise. If something attribute the pearla then it is remorseful. If something is remorseful then it posture the cherise. If something posture the cherise and the cherise does not chase the pearla then it does not chase the cherise. If something attribute the cherise then it does not visit the pearla. If something posture the cherise and the cherise attribute the pearla then the pearla posture the cherise. If something attribute the cherise and the cherise attribute the pearla then it does not visit the cherise. If something attribute the cherise and the cherise does not visit the pearla then the cherise is not unclaimed. If the cherise does not see the pearla and the pearla does not chase the cherise then the cherise is jamesian. The cherise does not see the pearla.", "logic": "\nAttribute(cherise, pearla)\nPosture(cherise, pearla)\nAttribute(pearla, cherise)\nforall x (Attribute(x, pearla) -> Remorseful(x))\nforall x (Remorseful(x) -> Posture(x, cherise))\nforall x (Posture(x, cherise) and not Attribute(cherise, pearla) -> not Attribute(x, cherise))\nforall x (Attribute(x, cherise) -> not Dragoon(x, pearla))\nforall x (Posture(x, cherise) and Attribute(cherise, pearla) -> Posture(pearla, cherise))\nforall x (Attribute(x, cherise) and Attribute(cherise, pearla) -> not Dragoon(x, cherise))\nforall x (Attribute(x, cherise) and not Dragoon(cherise, pearla) -> not Unclaimed(cherise))\nnot Posture(cherise, pearla) and not Attribute(pearla, cherise) -> Jamesian(cherise)\n\nnot Posture(cherise, pearla)\n\ntherefore Posture(cherise, pearla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The nelle subjoin the katinka. The nelle deceive the katinka. The katinka subjoin the nelle. If something subjoin the katinka then it is straight. If something is straight then it deceive the nelle. If something deceive the nelle and the nelle does not chase the katinka then it does not chase the nelle. If something subjoin the nelle then it does not visit the katinka. If something deceive the nelle and the nelle subjoin the katinka then the katinka deceive the nelle. If something subjoin the nelle and the nelle subjoin the katinka then it does not visit the nelle. If something subjoin the nelle and the nelle does not visit the katinka then the nelle is not retrousse. If the nelle does not see the katinka and the katinka does not chase the nelle then the nelle is scraggy. The katinka does not visit the katinka.", "logic": "\nSubjoin(nelle, katinka)\nDeceive(nelle, katinka)\nSubjoin(katinka, nelle)\nforall x (Subjoin(x, katinka) -> Straight(x))\nforall x (Straight(x) -> Deceive(x, nelle))\nforall x (Deceive(x, nelle) and not Subjoin(nelle, katinka) -> not Subjoin(x, nelle))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, nelle) -> not Conspire(x, katinka))\nforall x (Deceive(x, nelle) and Subjoin(nelle, katinka) -> Deceive(katinka, nelle))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, nelle) and Subjoin(nelle, katinka) -> not Conspire(x, nelle))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, nelle) and not Conspire(nelle, katinka) -> not Retrousse(nelle))\nnot Deceive(nelle, katinka) and not Subjoin(katinka, nelle) -> Scraggy(nelle)\n\nnot Conspire(katinka, katinka)\n\nSubjoin(katinka, nelle) and forall x (Subjoin(x, nelle) -> not Conspire(x, katinka)) -> therefore not Conspire(katinka, katinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The reeva bilge the ethelda. The reeva winter the ethelda. The ethelda bilge the reeva. If something bilge the ethelda then it is medullary. If something is medullary then it winter the reeva. If something winter the reeva and the reeva does not chase the ethelda then it does not chase the reeva. If something bilge the reeva then it does not visit the ethelda. If something winter the reeva and the reeva bilge the ethelda then the ethelda winter the reeva. If something bilge the reeva and the reeva bilge the ethelda then it does not visit the reeva. If something bilge the reeva and the reeva does not visit the ethelda then the reeva is not cheery. If the reeva does not see the ethelda and the ethelda does not chase the reeva then the reeva is hackneyed. The reeva is not medullary.", "logic": "\nBilge(reeva, ethelda)\nWinter(reeva, ethelda)\nBilge(ethelda, reeva)\nforall x (Bilge(x, ethelda) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) -> Winter(x, reeva))\nforall x (Winter(x, reeva) and not Bilge(reeva, ethelda) -> not Bilge(x, reeva))\nforall x (Bilge(x, reeva) -> not Scourge(x, ethelda))\nforall x (Winter(x, reeva) and Bilge(reeva, ethelda) -> Winter(ethelda, reeva))\nforall x (Bilge(x, reeva) and Bilge(reeva, ethelda) -> not Scourge(x, reeva))\nforall x (Bilge(x, reeva) and not Scourge(reeva, ethelda) -> not Cheery(reeva))\nnot Winter(reeva, ethelda) and not Bilge(ethelda, reeva) -> Hackneyed(reeva)\n\nnot Medullary(reeva)\n\nBilge(reeva, ethelda) and forall x (Bilge(x, ethelda) -> Medullary(x)) -> therefore Medullary(reeva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The alfreda skylark the eada. The alfreda prizefight the eada. The eada skylark the alfreda. If something skylark the eada then it is pitchy. If something is pitchy then it prizefight the alfreda. If something prizefight the alfreda and the alfreda does not chase the eada then it does not chase the alfreda. If something skylark the alfreda then it does not visit the eada. If something prizefight the alfreda and the alfreda skylark the eada then the eada prizefight the alfreda. If something skylark the alfreda and the alfreda skylark the eada then it does not visit the alfreda. If something skylark the alfreda and the alfreda does not visit the eada then the alfreda is not coptic. If the alfreda does not see the eada and the eada does not chase the alfreda then the alfreda is cloudy. The alfreda prizefight the alfreda.", "logic": "\nSkylark(alfreda, eada)\nPrizefight(alfreda, eada)\nSkylark(eada, alfreda)\nforall x (Skylark(x, eada) -> Pitchy(x))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) -> Prizefight(x, alfreda))\nforall x (Prizefight(x, alfreda) and not Skylark(alfreda, eada) -> not Skylark(x, alfreda))\nforall x (Skylark(x, alfreda) -> not Equalise(x, eada))\nforall x (Prizefight(x, alfreda) and Skylark(alfreda, eada) -> Prizefight(eada, alfreda))\nforall x (Skylark(x, alfreda) and Skylark(alfreda, eada) -> not Equalise(x, alfreda))\nforall x (Skylark(x, alfreda) and not Equalise(alfreda, eada) -> not Coptic(alfreda))\nnot Prizefight(alfreda, eada) and not Skylark(eada, alfreda) -> Cloudy(alfreda)\n\nPrizefight(alfreda, alfreda)\n\nSkylark(alfreda, eada) and forall x (Skylark(x, eada) -> Pitchy(x)) -> therefore Pitchy(alfreda) Pitchy(alfreda) and forall x (Pitchy(x) -> Prizefight(x, alfreda)) -> therefore Prizefight(alfreda, alfreda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The belia slash the werner. The belia antiquate the werner. The werner slash the belia. If something slash the werner then it is devoted. If something is devoted then it antiquate the belia. If something antiquate the belia and the belia does not chase the werner then it does not chase the belia. If something slash the belia then it does not visit the werner. If something antiquate the belia and the belia slash the werner then the werner antiquate the belia. If something slash the belia and the belia slash the werner then it does not visit the belia. If something slash the belia and the belia does not visit the werner then the belia is not conjugate. If the belia does not see the werner and the werner does not chase the belia then the belia is trackable. The belia does not see the belia.", "logic": "\nSlash(belia, werner)\nAntiquate(belia, werner)\nSlash(werner, belia)\nforall x (Slash(x, werner) -> Devoted(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Antiquate(x, belia))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, belia) and not Slash(belia, werner) -> not Slash(x, belia))\nforall x (Slash(x, belia) -> not Gangrene(x, werner))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, belia) and Slash(belia, werner) -> Antiquate(werner, belia))\nforall x (Slash(x, belia) and Slash(belia, werner) -> not Gangrene(x, belia))\nforall x (Slash(x, belia) and not Gangrene(belia, werner) -> not Conjugate(belia))\nnot Antiquate(belia, werner) and not Slash(werner, belia) -> Trackable(belia)\n\nnot Antiquate(belia, belia)\n\nSlash(belia, werner) and forall x (Slash(x, werner) -> Devoted(x)) -> therefore Devoted(belia) Devoted(belia) and forall x (Devoted(x) -> Antiquate(x, belia)) -> therefore Antiquate(belia, belia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The tarrance outcry the nada. The tarrance marinate the nada. The nada outcry the tarrance. If something outcry the nada then it is sprigged. If something is sprigged then it marinate the tarrance. If something marinate the tarrance and the tarrance does not chase the nada then it does not chase the tarrance. If something outcry the tarrance then it does not visit the nada. If something marinate the tarrance and the tarrance outcry the nada then the nada marinate the tarrance. If something outcry the tarrance and the tarrance outcry the nada then it does not visit the tarrance. If something outcry the tarrance and the tarrance does not visit the nada then the tarrance is not likeable. If the tarrance does not see the nada and the nada does not chase the tarrance then the tarrance is impeccant. The nada marinate the tarrance.", "logic": "\nOutcry(tarrance, nada)\nMarinate(tarrance, nada)\nOutcry(nada, tarrance)\nforall x (Outcry(x, nada) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Sprigged(x) -> Marinate(x, tarrance))\nforall x (Marinate(x, tarrance) and not Outcry(tarrance, nada) -> not Outcry(x, tarrance))\nforall x (Outcry(x, tarrance) -> not Disbar(x, nada))\nforall x (Marinate(x, tarrance) and Outcry(tarrance, nada) -> Marinate(nada, tarrance))\nforall x (Outcry(x, tarrance) and Outcry(tarrance, nada) -> not Disbar(x, tarrance))\nforall x (Outcry(x, tarrance) and not Disbar(tarrance, nada) -> not Likeable(tarrance))\nnot Marinate(tarrance, nada) and not Outcry(nada, tarrance) -> Impeccant(tarrance)\n\nMarinate(nada, tarrance)\n\nOutcry(tarrance, nada) and forall x (Outcry(x, nada) -> Sprigged(x)) -> therefore Sprigged(tarrance) Sprigged(tarrance) and forall x (Sprigged(x) -> Marinate(x, tarrance)) -> therefore Marinate(tarrance, tarrance) Marinate(tarrance, tarrance) and Outcry(tarrance, nada) and forall x (Marinate(x, tarrance) and Outcry(tarrance, nada) -> Marinate(nada, tarrance)) -> therefore Marinate(nada, tarrance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The breanne foreordain the jodie. The breanne detusk the jodie. The jodie foreordain the breanne. If something foreordain the jodie then it is ghostlike. If something is ghostlike then it detusk the breanne. If something detusk the breanne and the breanne does not chase the jodie then it does not chase the breanne. If something foreordain the breanne then it does not visit the jodie. If something detusk the breanne and the breanne foreordain the jodie then the jodie detusk the breanne. If something foreordain the breanne and the breanne foreordain the jodie then it does not visit the breanne. If something foreordain the breanne and the breanne does not visit the jodie then the breanne is not delinquent. If the breanne does not see the jodie and the jodie does not chase the breanne then the breanne is continuing. The jodie does not see the breanne.", "logic": "\nForeordain(breanne, jodie)\nDetusk(breanne, jodie)\nForeordain(jodie, breanne)\nforall x (Foreordain(x, jodie) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Detusk(x, breanne))\nforall x (Detusk(x, breanne) and not Foreordain(breanne, jodie) -> not Foreordain(x, breanne))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, breanne) -> not Massacre(x, jodie))\nforall x (Detusk(x, breanne) and Foreordain(breanne, jodie) -> Detusk(jodie, breanne))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, breanne) and Foreordain(breanne, jodie) -> not Massacre(x, breanne))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, breanne) and not Massacre(breanne, jodie) -> not Delinquent(breanne))\nnot Detusk(breanne, jodie) and not Foreordain(jodie, breanne) -> Continuing(breanne)\n\nnot Detusk(jodie, breanne)\n\nForeordain(breanne, jodie) and forall x (Foreordain(x, jodie) -> Ghostlike(x)) -> therefore Ghostlike(breanne) Ghostlike(breanne) and forall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Detusk(x, breanne)) -> therefore Detusk(breanne, breanne) Detusk(breanne, breanne) and Foreordain(breanne, jodie) and forall x (Detusk(x, breanne) and Foreordain(breanne, jodie) -> Detusk(jodie, breanne)) -> therefore Detusk(jodie, breanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The rhianna copper the silvester. The rhianna prate the silvester. The silvester copper the rhianna. If something copper the silvester then it is romaic. If something is romaic then it prate the rhianna. If something prate the rhianna and the rhianna does not chase the silvester then it does not chase the rhianna. If something copper the rhianna then it does not visit the silvester. If something prate the rhianna and the rhianna copper the silvester then the silvester prate the rhianna. If something copper the rhianna and the rhianna copper the silvester then it does not visit the rhianna. If something copper the rhianna and the rhianna does not visit the silvester then the rhianna is not sulfuric. If the rhianna does not see the silvester and the silvester does not chase the rhianna then the rhianna is tortious. The rhianna is not tortious.", "logic": "\nCopper(rhianna, silvester)\nPrate(rhianna, silvester)\nCopper(silvester, rhianna)\nforall x (Copper(x, silvester) -> Romaic(x))\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> Prate(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Prate(x, rhianna) and not Copper(rhianna, silvester) -> not Copper(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Copper(x, rhianna) -> not Bomb(x, silvester))\nforall x (Prate(x, rhianna) and Copper(rhianna, silvester) -> Prate(silvester, rhianna))\nforall x (Copper(x, rhianna) and Copper(rhianna, silvester) -> not Bomb(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Copper(x, rhianna) and not Bomb(rhianna, silvester) -> not Sulfuric(rhianna))\nnot Prate(rhianna, silvester) and not Copper(silvester, rhianna) -> Tortious(rhianna)\n\nnot Tortious(rhianna)\n\nnot Prate(rhianna, silvester) and not Copper(silvester, rhianna) -> Tortious(rhianna) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The robbi snag the lissy. The robbi misadvise the lissy. The lissy snag the robbi. If something snag the lissy then it is scopal. If something is scopal then it misadvise the robbi. If something misadvise the robbi and the robbi does not chase the lissy then it does not chase the robbi. If something snag the robbi then it does not visit the lissy. If something misadvise the robbi and the robbi snag the lissy then the lissy misadvise the robbi. If something snag the robbi and the robbi snag the lissy then it does not visit the robbi. If something snag the robbi and the robbi does not visit the lissy then the robbi is not sibyllic. If the robbi does not see the lissy and the lissy does not chase the robbi then the robbi is riblike. The lissy is scopal.", "logic": "\nSnag(robbi, lissy)\nMisadvise(robbi, lissy)\nSnag(lissy, robbi)\nforall x (Snag(x, lissy) -> Scopal(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> Misadvise(x, robbi))\nforall x (Misadvise(x, robbi) and not Snag(robbi, lissy) -> not Snag(x, robbi))\nforall x (Snag(x, robbi) -> not Ditch(x, lissy))\nforall x (Misadvise(x, robbi) and Snag(robbi, lissy) -> Misadvise(lissy, robbi))\nforall x (Snag(x, robbi) and Snag(robbi, lissy) -> not Ditch(x, robbi))\nforall x (Snag(x, robbi) and not Ditch(robbi, lissy) -> not Sibyllic(robbi))\nnot Misadvise(robbi, lissy) and not Snag(lissy, robbi) -> Riblike(robbi)\n\nScopal(lissy)\n\nforall x (Snag(x, lissy) -> Scopal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The nadiya affix the charity. The nadiya kindle the charity. The charity affix the nadiya. If something affix the charity then it is unpleasing. If something is unpleasing then it kindle the nadiya. If something kindle the nadiya and the nadiya does not chase the charity then it does not chase the nadiya. If something affix the nadiya then it does not visit the charity. If something kindle the nadiya and the nadiya affix the charity then the charity kindle the nadiya. If something affix the nadiya and the nadiya affix the charity then it does not visit the nadiya. If something affix the nadiya and the nadiya does not visit the charity then the nadiya is not spatial. If the nadiya does not see the charity and the charity does not chase the nadiya then the nadiya is expiratory. The nadiya is not spatial.", "logic": "\nAffix(nadiya, charity)\nKindle(nadiya, charity)\nAffix(charity, nadiya)\nforall x (Affix(x, charity) -> Unpleasing(x))\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Kindle(x, nadiya))\nforall x (Kindle(x, nadiya) and not Affix(nadiya, charity) -> not Affix(x, nadiya))\nforall x (Affix(x, nadiya) -> not Benefit(x, charity))\nforall x (Kindle(x, nadiya) and Affix(nadiya, charity) -> Kindle(charity, nadiya))\nforall x (Affix(x, nadiya) and Affix(nadiya, charity) -> not Benefit(x, nadiya))\nforall x (Affix(x, nadiya) and not Benefit(nadiya, charity) -> not Spatial(nadiya))\nnot Kindle(nadiya, charity) and not Affix(charity, nadiya) -> Expiratory(nadiya)\n\nnot Spatial(nadiya)\n\nnot Spatial(nadiya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The ivie rebury the josey. The ivie oversee the josey. The josey rebury the ivie. If something rebury the josey then it is immoral. If something is immoral then it oversee the ivie. If something oversee the ivie and the ivie does not chase the josey then it does not chase the ivie. If something rebury the ivie then it does not visit the josey. If something oversee the ivie and the ivie rebury the josey then the josey oversee the ivie. If something rebury the ivie and the ivie rebury the josey then it does not visit the ivie. If something rebury the ivie and the ivie does not visit the josey then the ivie is not broad. If the ivie does not see the josey and the josey does not chase the ivie then the ivie is seedless. The josey is cold.", "logic": "\nRebury(ivie, josey)\nOversee(ivie, josey)\nRebury(josey, ivie)\nforall x (Rebury(x, josey) -> Immoral(x))\nforall x (Immoral(x) -> Oversee(x, ivie))\nforall x (Oversee(x, ivie) and not Rebury(ivie, josey) -> not Rebury(x, ivie))\nforall x (Rebury(x, ivie) -> not Amputate(x, josey))\nforall x (Oversee(x, ivie) and Rebury(ivie, josey) -> Oversee(josey, ivie))\nforall x (Rebury(x, ivie) and Rebury(ivie, josey) -> not Amputate(x, ivie))\nforall x (Rebury(x, ivie) and not Amputate(ivie, josey) -> not Broad(ivie))\nnot Oversee(ivie, josey) and not Rebury(josey, ivie) -> Seedless(ivie)\n\nCold(josey)\n\nCold(josey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The allie oxygenize the tressa. The allie severalize the tressa. The tressa oxygenize the allie. If something oxygenize the tressa then it is distraught. If something is distraught then it severalize the allie. If something severalize the allie and the allie does not chase the tressa then it does not chase the allie. If something oxygenize the allie then it does not visit the tressa. If something severalize the allie and the allie oxygenize the tressa then the tressa severalize the allie. If something oxygenize the allie and the allie oxygenize the tressa then it does not visit the allie. If something oxygenize the allie and the allie does not visit the tressa then the allie is not bulbar. If the allie does not see the tressa and the tressa does not chase the allie then the allie is extant. The allie is not cold.", "logic": "\nOxygenize(allie, tressa)\nSeveralize(allie, tressa)\nOxygenize(tressa, allie)\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, tressa) -> Distraught(x))\nforall x (Distraught(x) -> Severalize(x, allie))\nforall x (Severalize(x, allie) and not Oxygenize(allie, tressa) -> not Oxygenize(x, allie))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, allie) -> not Covenant(x, tressa))\nforall x (Severalize(x, allie) and Oxygenize(allie, tressa) -> Severalize(tressa, allie))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, allie) and Oxygenize(allie, tressa) -> not Covenant(x, allie))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, allie) and not Covenant(allie, tressa) -> not Bulbar(allie))\nnot Severalize(allie, tressa) and not Oxygenize(tressa, allie) -> Extant(allie)\n\nnot Cold(allie)\n\nnot Cold(allie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The theodosia agonize the charlotte. The theodosia banquet the charlotte. The charlotte agonize the theodosia. If something agonize the charlotte then it is clinquant. If something is clinquant then it banquet the theodosia. If something banquet the theodosia and the theodosia does not chase the charlotte then it does not chase the theodosia. If something agonize the theodosia then it does not visit the charlotte. If something banquet the theodosia and the theodosia agonize the charlotte then the charlotte banquet the theodosia. If something agonize the theodosia and the theodosia agonize the charlotte then it does not visit the theodosia. If something agonize the theodosia and the theodosia does not visit the charlotte then the theodosia is not waterborne. If the theodosia does not see the charlotte and the charlotte does not chase the theodosia then the theodosia is primitive. The charlotte is primitive.", "logic": "\nAgonize(theodosia, charlotte)\nBanquet(theodosia, charlotte)\nAgonize(charlotte, theodosia)\nforall x (Agonize(x, charlotte) -> Clinquant(x))\nforall x (Clinquant(x) -> Banquet(x, theodosia))\nforall x (Banquet(x, theodosia) and not Agonize(theodosia, charlotte) -> not Agonize(x, theodosia))\nforall x (Agonize(x, theodosia) -> not Pilfer(x, charlotte))\nforall x (Banquet(x, theodosia) and Agonize(theodosia, charlotte) -> Banquet(charlotte, theodosia))\nforall x (Agonize(x, theodosia) and Agonize(theodosia, charlotte) -> not Pilfer(x, theodosia))\nforall x (Agonize(x, theodosia) and not Pilfer(theodosia, charlotte) -> not Waterborne(theodosia))\nnot Banquet(theodosia, charlotte) and not Agonize(charlotte, theodosia) -> Primitive(theodosia)\n\nPrimitive(charlotte)\n\nPrimitive(charlotte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The mercedes knot the trixie. The mercedes foot the trixie. The trixie knot the mercedes. If something knot the trixie then it is rimeless. If something is rimeless then it foot the mercedes. If something foot the mercedes and the mercedes does not chase the trixie then it does not chase the mercedes. If something knot the mercedes then it does not visit the trixie. If something foot the mercedes and the mercedes knot the trixie then the trixie foot the mercedes. If something knot the mercedes and the mercedes knot the trixie then it does not visit the mercedes. If something knot the mercedes and the mercedes does not visit the trixie then the mercedes is not undatable. If the mercedes does not see the trixie and the trixie does not chase the mercedes then the mercedes is loquacious. The mercedes does not visit the mercedes.", "logic": "\nKnot(mercedes, trixie)\nFoot(mercedes, trixie)\nKnot(trixie, mercedes)\nforall x (Knot(x, trixie) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Rimeless(x) -> Foot(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Foot(x, mercedes) and not Knot(mercedes, trixie) -> not Knot(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Knot(x, mercedes) -> not Route(x, trixie))\nforall x (Foot(x, mercedes) and Knot(mercedes, trixie) -> Foot(trixie, mercedes))\nforall x (Knot(x, mercedes) and Knot(mercedes, trixie) -> not Route(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Knot(x, mercedes) and not Route(mercedes, trixie) -> not Undatable(mercedes))\nnot Foot(mercedes, trixie) and not Knot(trixie, mercedes) -> Loquacious(mercedes)\n\nnot Route(mercedes, mercedes)\n\nnot Route(mercedes, mercedes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The henrik aver the jasmina. The henrik head the jasmina. The jasmina aver the henrik. If something aver the jasmina then it is officious. If something is officious then it head the henrik. If something head the henrik and the henrik does not chase the jasmina then it does not chase the henrik. If something aver the henrik then it does not visit the jasmina. If something head the henrik and the henrik aver the jasmina then the jasmina head the henrik. If something aver the henrik and the henrik aver the jasmina then it does not visit the henrik. If something aver the henrik and the henrik does not visit the jasmina then the henrik is not grotesque. If the henrik does not see the jasmina and the jasmina does not chase the henrik then the henrik is liturgical. The jasmina is nice.", "logic": "\nAver(henrik, jasmina)\nHead(henrik, jasmina)\nAver(jasmina, henrik)\nforall x (Aver(x, jasmina) -> Officious(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) -> Head(x, henrik))\nforall x (Head(x, henrik) and not Aver(henrik, jasmina) -> not Aver(x, henrik))\nforall x (Aver(x, henrik) -> not Sham(x, jasmina))\nforall x (Head(x, henrik) and Aver(henrik, jasmina) -> Head(jasmina, henrik))\nforall x (Aver(x, henrik) and Aver(henrik, jasmina) -> not Sham(x, henrik))\nforall x (Aver(x, henrik) and not Sham(henrik, jasmina) -> not Grotesque(henrik))\nnot Head(henrik, jasmina) and not Aver(jasmina, henrik) -> Liturgical(henrik)\n\nNice(jasmina)\n\nNice(jasmina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Olympe is compounded. Olympe is apian. Siward is compounded. Siward is voiced. Siward is ibsenian. Morty is compounded. Morty is concurring. Morty is apian. Sosanna is compounded. Sosanna is concurring. Sosanna is voiced. Sosanna is ibsenian. Sosanna is repelling. Sosanna is apian. Sosanna is aeonian. Quiet, concurring things are repelling. Young, voiced things are concurring. Young, concurring things are repelling. Nice, ibsenian things are aeonian. All repelling things are aeonian. All apian things are voiced. Morty is concurring.", "logic": "\nCompounded(olympe)\nApian(olympe)\nCompounded(siward)\nVoiced(siward)\nIbsenian(siward)\nCompounded(morty)\nConcurring(morty)\nApian(morty)\nCompounded(sosanna)\nConcurring(sosanna)\nVoiced(sosanna)\nIbsenian(sosanna)\nRepelling(sosanna)\nApian(sosanna)\nAeonian(sosanna)\nforall x (Voiced(x) and Concurring(x) -> Repelling(x))\nforall x (Aeonian(x) and Voiced(x) -> Concurring(x))\nforall x (Aeonian(x) and Concurring(x) -> Repelling(x))\nforall x (Concurring(x) and Ibsenian(x) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Repelling(x) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Apian(x) -> Voiced(x))\n\nConcurring(morty)\n\ntherefore Concurring(morty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Lory is shaping. Lory is stainless. Wayne is shaping. Wayne is propertied. Wayne is copulatory. Jacquelyn is shaping. Jacquelyn is nonionic. Jacquelyn is stainless. Sully is shaping. Sully is nonionic. Sully is propertied. Sully is copulatory. Sully is ambagious. Sully is stainless. Sully is irksome. Quiet, nonionic things are ambagious. Young, propertied things are nonionic. Young, nonionic things are ambagious. Nice, copulatory things are irksome. All ambagious things are irksome. All stainless things are propertied. Wayne is not propertied.", "logic": "\nShaping(lory)\nStainless(lory)\nShaping(wayne)\nPropertied(wayne)\nCopulatory(wayne)\nShaping(jacquelyn)\nNonionic(jacquelyn)\nStainless(jacquelyn)\nShaping(sully)\nNonionic(sully)\nPropertied(sully)\nCopulatory(sully)\nAmbagious(sully)\nStainless(sully)\nIrksome(sully)\nforall x (Propertied(x) and Nonionic(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Irksome(x) and Propertied(x) -> Nonionic(x))\nforall x (Irksome(x) and Nonionic(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Nonionic(x) and Copulatory(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Propertied(x))\n\nnot Propertied(wayne)\n\ntherefore Propertied(wayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Barnaby is scowling. Barnaby is chained. Jannelle is scowling. Jannelle is azonal. Jannelle is seraphic. Giffie is scowling. Giffie is caddish. Giffie is chained. Carlo is scowling. Carlo is caddish. Carlo is azonal. Carlo is seraphic. Carlo is depressant. Carlo is chained. Carlo is weedy. Quiet, caddish things are depressant. Young, azonal things are caddish. Young, caddish things are depressant. Nice, seraphic things are weedy. All depressant things are weedy. All chained things are azonal. Barnaby is azonal.", "logic": "\nScowling(barnaby)\nChained(barnaby)\nScowling(jannelle)\nAzonal(jannelle)\nSeraphic(jannelle)\nScowling(giffie)\nCaddish(giffie)\nChained(giffie)\nScowling(carlo)\nCaddish(carlo)\nAzonal(carlo)\nSeraphic(carlo)\nDepressant(carlo)\nChained(carlo)\nWeedy(carlo)\nforall x (Azonal(x) and Caddish(x) -> Depressant(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Azonal(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Caddish(x) -> Depressant(x))\nforall x (Caddish(x) and Seraphic(x) -> Weedy(x))\nforall x (Depressant(x) -> Weedy(x))\nforall x (Chained(x) -> Azonal(x))\n\nAzonal(barnaby)\n\nChained(barnaby) and forall x (Chained(x) -> Azonal(x)) -> therefore Azonal(barnaby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Candis is ecumenic. Candis is carbolated. Merralee is ecumenic. Merralee is plantar. Merralee is paved. Roman is ecumenic. Roman is sometime. Roman is carbolated. Emelina is ecumenic. Emelina is sometime. Emelina is plantar. Emelina is paved. Emelina is pedantic. Emelina is carbolated. Emelina is pelvic. Quiet, sometime things are pedantic. Young, plantar things are sometime. Young, sometime things are pedantic. Nice, paved things are pelvic. All pedantic things are pelvic. All carbolated things are plantar. Candis is not plantar.", "logic": "\nEcumenic(candis)\nCarbolated(candis)\nEcumenic(merralee)\nPlantar(merralee)\nPaved(merralee)\nEcumenic(roman)\nSometime(roman)\nCarbolated(roman)\nEcumenic(emelina)\nSometime(emelina)\nPlantar(emelina)\nPaved(emelina)\nPedantic(emelina)\nCarbolated(emelina)\nPelvic(emelina)\nforall x (Plantar(x) and Sometime(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) and Plantar(x) -> Sometime(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) and Sometime(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Sometime(x) and Paved(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Plantar(x))\n\nnot Plantar(candis)\n\nCarbolated(candis) and forall x (Carbolated(x) -> Plantar(x)) -> therefore Plantar(candis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Caitrin is ginger. Caitrin is diplomatic. Sal is ginger. Sal is verified. Sal is upstair. Orsola is ginger. Orsola is overage. Orsola is diplomatic. Case is ginger. Case is overage. Case is verified. Case is upstair. Case is concluded. Case is diplomatic. Case is laxative. Quiet, overage things are concluded. Young, verified things are overage. Young, overage things are concluded. Nice, upstair things are laxative. All concluded things are laxative. All diplomatic things are verified. Orsola is concluded.", "logic": "\nGinger(caitrin)\nDiplomatic(caitrin)\nGinger(sal)\nVerified(sal)\nUpstair(sal)\nGinger(orsola)\nOverage(orsola)\nDiplomatic(orsola)\nGinger(case)\nOverage(case)\nVerified(case)\nUpstair(case)\nConcluded(case)\nDiplomatic(case)\nLaxative(case)\nforall x (Verified(x) and Overage(x) -> Concluded(x))\nforall x (Laxative(x) and Verified(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Laxative(x) and Overage(x) -> Concluded(x))\nforall x (Overage(x) and Upstair(x) -> Laxative(x))\nforall x (Concluded(x) -> Laxative(x))\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) -> Verified(x))\n\nConcluded(orsola)\n\nDiplomatic(orsola) and forall x (Diplomatic(x) -> Verified(x)) -> therefore Verified(orsola) Verified(orsola) and Overage(orsola) and forall x (Verified(x) and Overage(x) -> Concluded(x)) -> therefore Concluded(orsola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Rosaleen is spiraling. Rosaleen is nugatory. Jeffry is spiraling. Jeffry is sloping. Jeffry is potbellied. Honey is spiraling. Honey is starred. Honey is nugatory. Corrianne is spiraling. Corrianne is starred. Corrianne is sloping. Corrianne is potbellied. Corrianne is villainous. Corrianne is nugatory. Corrianne is enthralled. Quiet, starred things are villainous. Young, sloping things are starred. Young, starred things are villainous. Nice, potbellied things are enthralled. All villainous things are enthralled. All nugatory things are sloping. Honey is not villainous.", "logic": "\nSpiraling(rosaleen)\nNugatory(rosaleen)\nSpiraling(jeffry)\nSloping(jeffry)\nPotbellied(jeffry)\nSpiraling(honey)\nStarred(honey)\nNugatory(honey)\nSpiraling(corrianne)\nStarred(corrianne)\nSloping(corrianne)\nPotbellied(corrianne)\nVillainous(corrianne)\nNugatory(corrianne)\nEnthralled(corrianne)\nforall x (Sloping(x) and Starred(x) -> Villainous(x))\nforall x (Enthralled(x) and Sloping(x) -> Starred(x))\nforall x (Enthralled(x) and Starred(x) -> Villainous(x))\nforall x (Starred(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Villainous(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Sloping(x))\n\nnot Villainous(honey)\n\nNugatory(honey) and forall x (Nugatory(x) -> Sloping(x)) -> therefore Sloping(honey) Sloping(honey) and Starred(honey) and forall x (Sloping(x) and Starred(x) -> Villainous(x)) -> therefore Villainous(honey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Alonzo is interested. Alonzo is antipodal. Deidre is interested. Deidre is sympatric. Deidre is pestilent. Cara is interested. Cara is moribund. Cara is antipodal. Rem is interested. Rem is moribund. Rem is sympatric. Rem is pestilent. Rem is labiate. Rem is antipodal. Rem is bated. Quiet, moribund things are labiate. Young, sympatric things are moribund. Young, moribund things are labiate. Nice, pestilent things are bated. All labiate things are bated. All antipodal things are sympatric. Cara is bated.", "logic": "\nInterested(alonzo)\nAntipodal(alonzo)\nInterested(deidre)\nSympatric(deidre)\nPestilent(deidre)\nInterested(cara)\nMoribund(cara)\nAntipodal(cara)\nInterested(rem)\nMoribund(rem)\nSympatric(rem)\nPestilent(rem)\nLabiate(rem)\nAntipodal(rem)\nBated(rem)\nforall x (Sympatric(x) and Moribund(x) -> Labiate(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) and Sympatric(x) -> Moribund(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) and Moribund(x) -> Labiate(x))\nforall x (Moribund(x) and Pestilent(x) -> Bated(x))\nforall x (Labiate(x) -> Bated(x))\nforall x (Antipodal(x) -> Sympatric(x))\n\nBated(cara)\n\nAntipodal(cara) and forall x (Antipodal(x) -> Sympatric(x)) -> therefore Sympatric(cara) Sympatric(cara) and Moribund(cara) and forall x (Sympatric(x) and Moribund(x) -> Labiate(x)) -> therefore Labiate(cara) Labiate(cara) and forall x (Labiate(x) -> Bated(x)) -> therefore Bated(cara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Alley is indelicate. Alley is freehand. Winonah is indelicate. Winonah is uppercase. Winonah is roast. Lory is indelicate. Lory is sheared. Lory is freehand. Tarrance is indelicate. Tarrance is sheared. Tarrance is uppercase. Tarrance is roast. Tarrance is manque. Tarrance is freehand. Tarrance is enabling. Quiet, sheared things are manque. Young, uppercase things are sheared. Young, sheared things are manque. Nice, roast things are enabling. All manque things are enabling. All freehand things are uppercase. Lory is not enabling.", "logic": "\nIndelicate(alley)\nFreehand(alley)\nIndelicate(winonah)\nUppercase(winonah)\nRoast(winonah)\nIndelicate(lory)\nSheared(lory)\nFreehand(lory)\nIndelicate(tarrance)\nSheared(tarrance)\nUppercase(tarrance)\nRoast(tarrance)\nManque(tarrance)\nFreehand(tarrance)\nEnabling(tarrance)\nforall x (Uppercase(x) and Sheared(x) -> Manque(x))\nforall x (Enabling(x) and Uppercase(x) -> Sheared(x))\nforall x (Enabling(x) and Sheared(x) -> Manque(x))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and Roast(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Freehand(x) -> Uppercase(x))\n\nnot Enabling(lory)\n\nFreehand(lory) and forall x (Freehand(x) -> Uppercase(x)) -> therefore Uppercase(lory) Uppercase(lory) and Sheared(lory) and forall x (Uppercase(x) and Sheared(x) -> Manque(x)) -> therefore Manque(lory) Manque(lory) and forall x (Manque(x) -> Enabling(x)) -> therefore Enabling(lory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Pincus is viable. Pincus is pardonable. Adam is viable. Adam is timed. Adam is bobtailed. Logan is viable. Logan is prize. Logan is pardonable. Wesley is viable. Wesley is prize. Wesley is timed. Wesley is bobtailed. Wesley is franciscan. Wesley is pardonable. Wesley is convergent. Quiet, prize things are franciscan. Young, timed things are prize. Young, prize things are franciscan. Nice, bobtailed things are convergent. All franciscan things are convergent. All pardonable things are timed. Adam is not franciscan.", "logic": "\nViable(pincus)\nPardonable(pincus)\nViable(adam)\nTimed(adam)\nBobtailed(adam)\nViable(logan)\nPrize(logan)\nPardonable(logan)\nViable(wesley)\nPrize(wesley)\nTimed(wesley)\nBobtailed(wesley)\nFranciscan(wesley)\nPardonable(wesley)\nConvergent(wesley)\nforall x (Timed(x) and Prize(x) -> Franciscan(x))\nforall x (Convergent(x) and Timed(x) -> Prize(x))\nforall x (Convergent(x) and Prize(x) -> Franciscan(x))\nforall x (Prize(x) and Bobtailed(x) -> Convergent(x))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) -> Convergent(x))\nforall x (Pardonable(x) -> Timed(x))\n\nnot Franciscan(adam)\n\nforall x (Timed(x) and Prize(x) -> Franciscan(x)) <- forall x (Convergent(x) and Timed(x) -> Prize(x)) <- forall x (Franciscan(x) -> Convergent(x)) <- forall x (Convergent(x) and Prize(x) -> Franciscan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Corilla is unmelodic. Corilla is motherly. Daffie is unmelodic. Daffie is extendible. Daffie is aerolitic. Andrzej is unmelodic. Andrzej is civic. Andrzej is motherly. Dyana is unmelodic. Dyana is civic. Dyana is extendible. Dyana is aerolitic. Dyana is played. Dyana is motherly. Dyana is extraneous. Quiet, civic things are played. Young, extendible things are civic. Young, civic things are played. Nice, aerolitic things are extraneous. All played things are extraneous. All motherly things are extendible. Daffie is extraneous.", "logic": "\nUnmelodic(corilla)\nMotherly(corilla)\nUnmelodic(daffie)\nExtendible(daffie)\nAerolitic(daffie)\nUnmelodic(andrzej)\nCivic(andrzej)\nMotherly(andrzej)\nUnmelodic(dyana)\nCivic(dyana)\nExtendible(dyana)\nAerolitic(dyana)\nPlayed(dyana)\nMotherly(dyana)\nExtraneous(dyana)\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Civic(x) -> Played(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) and Extendible(x) -> Civic(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) and Civic(x) -> Played(x))\nforall x (Civic(x) and Aerolitic(x) -> Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Played(x) -> Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) -> Extendible(x))\n\nExtraneous(daffie)\n\nforall x (Civic(x) and Aerolitic(x) -> Extraneous(x)) <- forall x (Extraneous(x) and Extendible(x) -> Civic(x)) <- forall x (Played(x) -> Extraneous(x)) <- forall x (Extendible(x) and Civic(x) -> Played(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Pammi is probatory. Pammi is oaten. Jabez is probatory. Jabez is chiliastic. Jabez is tiddly. Waylen is probatory. Waylen is fattened. Waylen is oaten. Kathy is probatory. Kathy is fattened. Kathy is chiliastic. Kathy is tiddly. Kathy is accordant. Kathy is oaten. Kathy is inwrought. Quiet, fattened things are accordant. Young, chiliastic things are fattened. Young, fattened things are accordant. Nice, tiddly things are inwrought. All accordant things are inwrought. All oaten things are chiliastic. Pammi is not fattened.", "logic": "\nProbatory(pammi)\nOaten(pammi)\nProbatory(jabez)\nChiliastic(jabez)\nTiddly(jabez)\nProbatory(waylen)\nFattened(waylen)\nOaten(waylen)\nProbatory(kathy)\nFattened(kathy)\nChiliastic(kathy)\nTiddly(kathy)\nAccordant(kathy)\nOaten(kathy)\nInwrought(kathy)\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) and Fattened(x) -> Accordant(x))\nforall x (Inwrought(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Fattened(x))\nforall x (Inwrought(x) and Fattened(x) -> Accordant(x))\nforall x (Fattened(x) and Tiddly(x) -> Inwrought(x))\nforall x (Accordant(x) -> Inwrought(x))\nforall x (Oaten(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\n\nnot Fattened(pammi)\n\nforall x (Inwrought(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Fattened(x)) <- forall x (Accordant(x) -> Inwrought(x)) <- forall x (Chiliastic(x) and Fattened(x) -> Accordant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Scotti is pilous. Scotti is tertian. Adeline is pilous. Adeline is unexcelled. Adeline is baffled. Davidde is pilous. Davidde is imminent. Davidde is tertian. Charlena is pilous. Charlena is imminent. Charlena is unexcelled. Charlena is baffled. Charlena is mercerised. Charlena is tertian. Charlena is increasing. Quiet, imminent things are mercerised. Young, unexcelled things are imminent. Young, imminent things are mercerised. Nice, baffled things are increasing. All mercerised things are increasing. All tertian things are unexcelled. Adeline is imminent.", "logic": "\nPilous(scotti)\nTertian(scotti)\nPilous(adeline)\nUnexcelled(adeline)\nBaffled(adeline)\nPilous(davidde)\nImminent(davidde)\nTertian(davidde)\nPilous(charlena)\nImminent(charlena)\nUnexcelled(charlena)\nBaffled(charlena)\nMercerised(charlena)\nTertian(charlena)\nIncreasing(charlena)\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) and Imminent(x) -> Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) and Unexcelled(x) -> Imminent(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) and Imminent(x) -> Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Imminent(x) and Baffled(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Mercerised(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Tertian(x) -> Unexcelled(x))\n\nImminent(adeline)\n\nforall x (Increasing(x) and Unexcelled(x) -> Imminent(x)) <- forall x (Mercerised(x) -> Increasing(x)) <- forall x (Unexcelled(x) and Imminent(x) -> Mercerised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Belvia is fraternal. Belvia is joyous. Amandy is fraternal. Amandy is sacrosanct. Amandy is advisory. Eustacia is fraternal. Eustacia is monoatomic. Eustacia is joyous. Bennie is fraternal. Bennie is monoatomic. Bennie is sacrosanct. Bennie is advisory. Bennie is noncausal. Bennie is joyous. Bennie is actinal. Quiet, monoatomic things are noncausal. Young, sacrosanct things are monoatomic. Young, monoatomic things are noncausal. Nice, advisory things are actinal. All noncausal things are actinal. All joyous things are sacrosanct. Eustacia is not advisory.", "logic": "\nFraternal(belvia)\nJoyous(belvia)\nFraternal(amandy)\nSacrosanct(amandy)\nAdvisory(amandy)\nFraternal(eustacia)\nMonoatomic(eustacia)\nJoyous(eustacia)\nFraternal(bennie)\nMonoatomic(bennie)\nSacrosanct(bennie)\nAdvisory(bennie)\nNoncausal(bennie)\nJoyous(bennie)\nActinal(bennie)\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Monoatomic(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Actinal(x) and Sacrosanct(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Actinal(x) and Monoatomic(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) and Advisory(x) -> Actinal(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Actinal(x))\nforall x (Joyous(x) -> Sacrosanct(x))\n\nnot Advisory(eustacia)\n\nnot Advisory(eustacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Eveleen is recursive. Eveleen is wary. Stephenie is recursive. Stephenie is peaky. Stephenie is czarist. Hammad is recursive. Hammad is prudent. Hammad is wary. Lauren is recursive. Lauren is prudent. Lauren is peaky. Lauren is czarist. Lauren is violent. Lauren is wary. Lauren is comburant. Quiet, prudent things are violent. Young, peaky things are prudent. Young, prudent things are violent. Nice, czarist things are comburant. All violent things are comburant. All wary things are peaky. Stephenie is wary.", "logic": "\nRecursive(eveleen)\nWary(eveleen)\nRecursive(stephenie)\nPeaky(stephenie)\nCzarist(stephenie)\nRecursive(hammad)\nPrudent(hammad)\nWary(hammad)\nRecursive(lauren)\nPrudent(lauren)\nPeaky(lauren)\nCzarist(lauren)\nViolent(lauren)\nWary(lauren)\nComburant(lauren)\nforall x (Peaky(x) and Prudent(x) -> Violent(x))\nforall x (Comburant(x) and Peaky(x) -> Prudent(x))\nforall x (Comburant(x) and Prudent(x) -> Violent(x))\nforall x (Prudent(x) and Czarist(x) -> Comburant(x))\nforall x (Violent(x) -> Comburant(x))\nforall x (Wary(x) -> Peaky(x))\n\nWary(stephenie)\n\nWary(stephenie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "The sebastien wire the abigale. The sebastien is tarry. The sebastien colourise the abigale. The abigale wire the sebastien. The abigale is coltish. The abigale spike the sebastien. The abigale colourise the sebastien. If something is tarry then it spike the sebastien. All hitlerian things are swishy. Big things are hitlerian. If something is hitlerian and it colourise the sebastien then it spike the sebastien. If something is coltish then it spike the abigale. If something colourise the sebastien and the sebastien is hitlerian then it wire the sebastien. If the sebastien colourise the abigale and the abigale colourise the sebastien then the abigale is latvian. If the sebastien wire the abigale then the abigale is tarry. The sebastien wire the abigale.", "logic": "\nWire(sebastien, abigale)\nTarry(sebastien)\nColourise(sebastien, abigale)\nWire(abigale, sebastien)\nColtish(abigale)\nSpike(abigale, sebastien)\nColourise(abigale, sebastien)\nforall x (Tarry(x) -> Spike(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Hitlerian(x) -> Swishy(x))\nforall x (Tarry(x) -> Hitlerian(x))\nforall x (Hitlerian(x) and Colourise(x, sebastien) -> Spike(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Coltish(x) -> Spike(x, abigale))\nforall x (Colourise(x, sebastien) and Hitlerian(sebastien) -> Wire(x, sebastien))\nColourise(sebastien, abigale) and Colourise(abigale, sebastien) -> Latvian(abigale)\nWire(sebastien, abigale) -> Tarry(abigale)\n\nWire(sebastien, abigale)\n\ntherefore Wire(sebastien, abigale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The eloise spirit the ivory. The eloise is tahitian. The eloise outcry the ivory. The ivory spirit the eloise. The ivory is sweltry. The ivory bleat the eloise. The ivory outcry the eloise. If something is tahitian then it bleat the eloise. All schematic things are incertain. Big things are schematic. If something is schematic and it outcry the eloise then it bleat the eloise. If something is sweltry then it bleat the ivory. If something outcry the eloise and the eloise is schematic then it spirit the eloise. If the eloise outcry the ivory and the ivory outcry the eloise then the ivory is gritty. If the eloise spirit the ivory then the ivory is tahitian. The ivory does not need the eloise.", "logic": "\nSpirit(eloise, ivory)\nTahitian(eloise)\nOutcry(eloise, ivory)\nSpirit(ivory, eloise)\nSweltry(ivory)\nBleat(ivory, eloise)\nOutcry(ivory, eloise)\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> Bleat(x, eloise))\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Incertain(x))\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> Schematic(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) and Outcry(x, eloise) -> Bleat(x, eloise))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) -> Bleat(x, ivory))\nforall x (Outcry(x, eloise) and Schematic(eloise) -> Spirit(x, eloise))\nOutcry(eloise, ivory) and Outcry(ivory, eloise) -> Gritty(ivory)\nSpirit(eloise, ivory) -> Tahitian(ivory)\n\nnot Outcry(ivory, eloise)\n\ntherefore Outcry(ivory, eloise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The garp smile the leesa. The garp is passerine. The garp incur the leesa. The leesa smile the garp. The leesa is comal. The leesa quake the garp. The leesa incur the garp. If something is passerine then it quake the garp. All senecan things are sarawakian. Big things are senecan. If something is senecan and it incur the garp then it quake the garp. If something is comal then it quake the leesa. If something incur the garp and the garp is senecan then it smile the garp. If the garp incur the leesa and the leesa incur the garp then the leesa is endless. If the garp smile the leesa then the leesa is passerine. The leesa quake the leesa.", "logic": "\nSmile(garp, leesa)\nPasserine(garp)\nIncur(garp, leesa)\nSmile(leesa, garp)\nComal(leesa)\nQuake(leesa, garp)\nIncur(leesa, garp)\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Quake(x, garp))\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) and Incur(x, garp) -> Quake(x, garp))\nforall x (Comal(x) -> Quake(x, leesa))\nforall x (Incur(x, garp) and Senecan(garp) -> Smile(x, garp))\nIncur(garp, leesa) and Incur(leesa, garp) -> Endless(leesa)\nSmile(garp, leesa) -> Passerine(leesa)\n\nQuake(leesa, leesa)\n\nComal(leesa) and forall x (Comal(x) -> Quake(x, leesa)) -> therefore Quake(leesa, leesa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The rhodie improve the meridith. The rhodie is scaled. The rhodie dibble the meridith. The meridith improve the rhodie. The meridith is epithelial. The meridith scuffle the rhodie. The meridith dibble the rhodie. If something is scaled then it scuffle the rhodie. All frothing things are antibiotic. Big things are frothing. If something is frothing and it dibble the rhodie then it scuffle the rhodie. If something is epithelial then it scuffle the meridith. If something dibble the rhodie and the rhodie is frothing then it improve the rhodie. If the rhodie dibble the meridith and the meridith dibble the rhodie then the meridith is cattish. If the rhodie improve the meridith then the meridith is scaled. The meridith is not cattish.", "logic": "\nImprove(rhodie, meridith)\nScaled(rhodie)\nDibble(rhodie, meridith)\nImprove(meridith, rhodie)\nEpithelial(meridith)\nScuffle(meridith, rhodie)\nDibble(meridith, rhodie)\nforall x (Scaled(x) -> Scuffle(x, rhodie))\nforall x (Frothing(x) -> Antibiotic(x))\nforall x (Scaled(x) -> Frothing(x))\nforall x (Frothing(x) and Dibble(x, rhodie) -> Scuffle(x, rhodie))\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> Scuffle(x, meridith))\nforall x (Dibble(x, rhodie) and Frothing(rhodie) -> Improve(x, rhodie))\nDibble(rhodie, meridith) and Dibble(meridith, rhodie) -> Cattish(meridith)\nImprove(rhodie, meridith) -> Scaled(meridith)\n\nnot Cattish(meridith)\n\nDibble(rhodie, meridith) and Dibble(meridith, rhodie) and Dibble(rhodie, meridith) and Dibble(meridith, rhodie) -> Cattish(meridith) -> therefore Cattish(meridith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The lucius pull the andriette. The lucius is glassed. The lucius skitter the andriette. The andriette pull the lucius. The andriette is sour. The andriette alchemize the lucius. The andriette skitter the lucius. If something is glassed then it alchemize the lucius. All dour things are toxic. Big things are dour. If something is dour and it skitter the lucius then it alchemize the lucius. If something is sour then it alchemize the andriette. If something skitter the lucius and the lucius is dour then it pull the lucius. If the lucius skitter the andriette and the andriette skitter the lucius then the andriette is damned. If the lucius pull the andriette then the andriette is glassed. The andriette is dour.", "logic": "\nPull(lucius, andriette)\nGlassed(lucius)\nSkitter(lucius, andriette)\nPull(andriette, lucius)\nSour(andriette)\nAlchemize(andriette, lucius)\nSkitter(andriette, lucius)\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Alchemize(x, lucius))\nforall x (Dour(x) -> Toxic(x))\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Dour(x))\nforall x (Dour(x) and Skitter(x, lucius) -> Alchemize(x, lucius))\nforall x (Sour(x) -> Alchemize(x, andriette))\nforall x (Skitter(x, lucius) and Dour(lucius) -> Pull(x, lucius))\nSkitter(lucius, andriette) and Skitter(andriette, lucius) -> Damned(andriette)\nPull(lucius, andriette) -> Glassed(andriette)\n\nDour(andriette)\n\nPull(lucius, andriette) and Pull(lucius, andriette) -> Glassed(andriette) -> therefore Glassed(andriette) Glassed(andriette) and forall x (Glassed(x) -> Dour(x)) -> therefore Dour(andriette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The faina abash the anetta. The faina is endermatic. The faina diagnose the anetta. The anetta abash the faina. The anetta is cohesive. The anetta ballyhoo the faina. The anetta diagnose the faina. If something is endermatic then it ballyhoo the faina. All emphatic things are popular. Big things are emphatic. If something is emphatic and it diagnose the faina then it ballyhoo the faina. If something is cohesive then it ballyhoo the anetta. If something diagnose the faina and the faina is emphatic then it abash the faina. If the faina diagnose the anetta and the anetta diagnose the faina then the anetta is wrathful. If the faina abash the anetta then the anetta is endermatic. The faina is not popular.", "logic": "\nAbash(faina, anetta)\nEndermatic(faina)\nDiagnose(faina, anetta)\nAbash(anetta, faina)\nCohesive(anetta)\nBallyhoo(anetta, faina)\nDiagnose(anetta, faina)\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Ballyhoo(x, faina))\nforall x (Emphatic(x) -> Popular(x))\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Emphatic(x))\nforall x (Emphatic(x) and Diagnose(x, faina) -> Ballyhoo(x, faina))\nforall x (Cohesive(x) -> Ballyhoo(x, anetta))\nforall x (Diagnose(x, faina) and Emphatic(faina) -> Abash(x, faina))\nDiagnose(faina, anetta) and Diagnose(anetta, faina) -> Wrathful(anetta)\nAbash(faina, anetta) -> Endermatic(anetta)\n\nnot Popular(faina)\n\nEndermatic(faina) and forall x (Endermatic(x) -> Emphatic(x)) -> therefore Emphatic(faina) Emphatic(faina) and forall x (Emphatic(x) -> Popular(x)) -> therefore Popular(faina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The milicent cruise the gratia. The milicent is bhutanese. The milicent aerify the gratia. The gratia cruise the milicent. The gratia is slouchy. The gratia empower the milicent. The gratia aerify the milicent. If something is bhutanese then it empower the milicent. All unwrinkled things are unstinting. Big things are unwrinkled. If something is unwrinkled and it aerify the milicent then it empower the milicent. If something is slouchy then it empower the gratia. If something aerify the milicent and the milicent is unwrinkled then it cruise the milicent. If the milicent aerify the gratia and the gratia aerify the milicent then the gratia is ignored. If the milicent cruise the gratia then the gratia is bhutanese. The gratia is unstinting.", "logic": "\nCruise(milicent, gratia)\nBhutanese(milicent)\nAerify(milicent, gratia)\nCruise(gratia, milicent)\nSlouchy(gratia)\nEmpower(gratia, milicent)\nAerify(gratia, milicent)\nforall x (Bhutanese(x) -> Empower(x, milicent))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nforall x (Bhutanese(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) and Aerify(x, milicent) -> Empower(x, milicent))\nforall x (Slouchy(x) -> Empower(x, gratia))\nforall x (Aerify(x, milicent) and Unwrinkled(milicent) -> Cruise(x, milicent))\nAerify(milicent, gratia) and Aerify(gratia, milicent) -> Ignored(gratia)\nCruise(milicent, gratia) -> Bhutanese(gratia)\n\nUnstinting(gratia)\n\nCruise(milicent, gratia) and Cruise(milicent, gratia) -> Bhutanese(gratia) -> therefore Bhutanese(gratia) Bhutanese(gratia) and forall x (Bhutanese(x) -> Unwrinkled(x)) -> therefore Unwrinkled(gratia) Unwrinkled(gratia) and forall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Unstinting(x)) -> therefore Unstinting(gratia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The umeko underquote the bryana. The umeko is literate. The umeko scrabble the bryana. The bryana underquote the umeko. The bryana is knockabout. The bryana sour the umeko. The bryana scrabble the umeko. If something is literate then it sour the umeko. All bimotored things are bouncy. Big things are bimotored. If something is bimotored and it scrabble the umeko then it sour the umeko. If something is knockabout then it sour the bryana. If something scrabble the umeko and the umeko is bimotored then it underquote the umeko. If the umeko scrabble the bryana and the bryana scrabble the umeko then the bryana is ascitic. If the umeko underquote the bryana then the bryana is literate. The bryana is not bouncy.", "logic": "\nUnderquote(umeko, bryana)\nLiterate(umeko)\nScrabble(umeko, bryana)\nUnderquote(bryana, umeko)\nKnockabout(bryana)\nSour(bryana, umeko)\nScrabble(bryana, umeko)\nforall x (Literate(x) -> Sour(x, umeko))\nforall x (Bimotored(x) -> Bouncy(x))\nforall x (Literate(x) -> Bimotored(x))\nforall x (Bimotored(x) and Scrabble(x, umeko) -> Sour(x, umeko))\nforall x (Knockabout(x) -> Sour(x, bryana))\nforall x (Scrabble(x, umeko) and Bimotored(umeko) -> Underquote(x, umeko))\nScrabble(umeko, bryana) and Scrabble(bryana, umeko) -> Ascitic(bryana)\nUnderquote(umeko, bryana) -> Literate(bryana)\n\nnot Bouncy(bryana)\n\nUnderquote(umeko, bryana) and Underquote(umeko, bryana) -> Literate(bryana) -> therefore Literate(bryana) Literate(bryana) and forall x (Literate(x) -> Bimotored(x)) -> therefore Bimotored(bryana) Bimotored(bryana) and forall x (Bimotored(x) -> Bouncy(x)) -> therefore Bouncy(bryana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The odin stultify the jake. The odin is mobile. The odin skirl the jake. The jake stultify the odin. The jake is taken. The jake skreak the odin. The jake skirl the odin. If something is mobile then it skreak the odin. All hunched things are punishing. Big things are hunched. If something is hunched and it skirl the odin then it skreak the odin. If something is taken then it skreak the jake. If something skirl the odin and the odin is hunched then it stultify the odin. If the odin skirl the jake and the jake skirl the odin then the jake is velvety. If the odin stultify the jake then the jake is mobile. The odin does not eat the odin.", "logic": "\nStultify(odin, jake)\nMobile(odin)\nSkirl(odin, jake)\nStultify(jake, odin)\nTaken(jake)\nSkreak(jake, odin)\nSkirl(jake, odin)\nforall x (Mobile(x) -> Skreak(x, odin))\nforall x (Hunched(x) -> Punishing(x))\nforall x (Mobile(x) -> Hunched(x))\nforall x (Hunched(x) and Skirl(x, odin) -> Skreak(x, odin))\nforall x (Taken(x) -> Skreak(x, jake))\nforall x (Skirl(x, odin) and Hunched(odin) -> Stultify(x, odin))\nSkirl(odin, jake) and Skirl(jake, odin) -> Velvety(jake)\nStultify(odin, jake) -> Mobile(jake)\n\nnot Stultify(odin, odin)\n\nforall x (Skirl(x, odin) and Hunched(odin) -> Stultify(x, odin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The roberto peep the ford. The roberto is jade. The roberto affix the ford. The ford peep the roberto. The ford is awake. The ford cushion the roberto. The ford affix the roberto. If something is jade then it cushion the roberto. All mustached things are thickening. Big things are mustached. If something is mustached and it affix the roberto then it cushion the roberto. If something is awake then it cushion the ford. If something affix the roberto and the roberto is mustached then it peep the roberto. If the roberto affix the ford and the ford affix the roberto then the ford is side. If the roberto peep the ford then the ford is jade. The roberto cushion the ford.", "logic": "\nPeep(roberto, ford)\nJade(roberto)\nAffix(roberto, ford)\nPeep(ford, roberto)\nAwake(ford)\nCushion(ford, roberto)\nAffix(ford, roberto)\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Cushion(x, roberto))\nforall x (Mustached(x) -> Thickening(x))\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Mustached(x))\nforall x (Mustached(x) and Affix(x, roberto) -> Cushion(x, roberto))\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Cushion(x, ford))\nforall x (Affix(x, roberto) and Mustached(roberto) -> Peep(x, roberto))\nAffix(roberto, ford) and Affix(ford, roberto) -> Side(ford)\nPeep(roberto, ford) -> Jade(ford)\n\nCushion(roberto, ford)\n\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Cushion(x, ford)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The dani snarf the roana. The dani is chiasmatic. The dani chain the roana. The roana snarf the dani. The roana is choked. The roana best the dani. The roana chain the dani. If something is chiasmatic then it best the dani. All endermic things are omani. Big things are endermic. If something is endermic and it chain the dani then it best the dani. If something is choked then it best the roana. If something chain the dani and the dani is endermic then it snarf the dani. If the dani chain the roana and the roana chain the dani then the roana is cowardly. If the dani snarf the roana then the roana is chiasmatic. The dani does not need the dani.", "logic": "\nSnarf(dani, roana)\nChiasmatic(dani)\nChain(dani, roana)\nSnarf(roana, dani)\nChoked(roana)\nBest(roana, dani)\nChain(roana, dani)\nforall x (Chiasmatic(x) -> Best(x, dani))\nforall x (Endermic(x) -> Omani(x))\nforall x (Chiasmatic(x) -> Endermic(x))\nforall x (Endermic(x) and Chain(x, dani) -> Best(x, dani))\nforall x (Choked(x) -> Best(x, roana))\nforall x (Chain(x, dani) and Endermic(dani) -> Snarf(x, dani))\nChain(dani, roana) and Chain(roana, dani) -> Cowardly(roana)\nSnarf(dani, roana) -> Chiasmatic(roana)\n\nnot Chain(dani, dani)\n\nnot Chain(dani, dani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The ardra envisage the arlie. The ardra is chechen. The ardra shimmer the arlie. The arlie envisage the ardra. The arlie is nonnative. The arlie derestrict the ardra. The arlie shimmer the ardra. If something is chechen then it derestrict the ardra. All swinish things are despicable. Big things are swinish. If something is swinish and it shimmer the ardra then it derestrict the ardra. If something is nonnative then it derestrict the arlie. If something shimmer the ardra and the ardra is swinish then it envisage the ardra. If the ardra shimmer the arlie and the arlie shimmer the ardra then the arlie is initiatory. If the ardra envisage the arlie then the arlie is chechen. The ardra is initiatory.", "logic": "\nEnvisage(ardra, arlie)\nChechen(ardra)\nShimmer(ardra, arlie)\nEnvisage(arlie, ardra)\nNonnative(arlie)\nDerestrict(arlie, ardra)\nShimmer(arlie, ardra)\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Derestrict(x, ardra))\nforall x (Swinish(x) -> Despicable(x))\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Swinish(x) and Shimmer(x, ardra) -> Derestrict(x, ardra))\nforall x (Nonnative(x) -> Derestrict(x, arlie))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, ardra) and Swinish(ardra) -> Envisage(x, ardra))\nShimmer(ardra, arlie) and Shimmer(arlie, ardra) -> Initiatory(arlie)\nEnvisage(ardra, arlie) -> Chechen(arlie)\n\nInitiatory(ardra)\n\nInitiatory(ardra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The velma fraternize the mellissa. The velma is reputable. The velma dress the mellissa. The mellissa fraternize the velma. The mellissa is orotund. The mellissa spell the velma. The mellissa dress the velma. If something is reputable then it spell the velma. All feculent things are wonderful. Big things are feculent. If something is feculent and it dress the velma then it spell the velma. If something is orotund then it spell the mellissa. If something dress the velma and the velma is feculent then it fraternize the velma. If the velma dress the mellissa and the mellissa dress the velma then the mellissa is nodding. If the velma fraternize the mellissa then the mellissa is reputable. The velma is not orotund.", "logic": "\nFraternize(velma, mellissa)\nReputable(velma)\nDress(velma, mellissa)\nFraternize(mellissa, velma)\nOrotund(mellissa)\nSpell(mellissa, velma)\nDress(mellissa, velma)\nforall x (Reputable(x) -> Spell(x, velma))\nforall x (Feculent(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nforall x (Reputable(x) -> Feculent(x))\nforall x (Feculent(x) and Dress(x, velma) -> Spell(x, velma))\nforall x (Orotund(x) -> Spell(x, mellissa))\nforall x (Dress(x, velma) and Feculent(velma) -> Fraternize(x, velma))\nDress(velma, mellissa) and Dress(mellissa, velma) -> Nodding(mellissa)\nFraternize(velma, mellissa) -> Reputable(mellissa)\n\nnot Orotund(velma)\n\nnot Orotund(velma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The doreen bray the chadwick. The doreen is crimson. The doreen scalp the chadwick. The chadwick bray the doreen. The chadwick is titillated. The chadwick welcome the doreen. The chadwick scalp the doreen. If something is crimson then it welcome the doreen. All agnostic things are sinning. Big things are agnostic. If something is agnostic and it scalp the doreen then it welcome the doreen. If something is titillated then it welcome the chadwick. If something scalp the doreen and the doreen is agnostic then it bray the doreen. If the doreen scalp the chadwick and the chadwick scalp the doreen then the chadwick is lemony. If the doreen bray the chadwick then the chadwick is crimson. The chadwick bray the chadwick.", "logic": "\nBray(doreen, chadwick)\nCrimson(doreen)\nScalp(doreen, chadwick)\nBray(chadwick, doreen)\nTitillated(chadwick)\nWelcome(chadwick, doreen)\nScalp(chadwick, doreen)\nforall x (Crimson(x) -> Welcome(x, doreen))\nforall x (Agnostic(x) -> Sinning(x))\nforall x (Crimson(x) -> Agnostic(x))\nforall x (Agnostic(x) and Scalp(x, doreen) -> Welcome(x, doreen))\nforall x (Titillated(x) -> Welcome(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Scalp(x, doreen) and Agnostic(doreen) -> Bray(x, doreen))\nScalp(doreen, chadwick) and Scalp(chadwick, doreen) -> Lemony(chadwick)\nBray(doreen, chadwick) -> Crimson(chadwick)\n\nBray(chadwick, chadwick)\n\nBray(chadwick, chadwick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The berget is bounderish. Round, bounderish things are not interim. If the berget is undepicted and the berget is interim then the berget is not bounderish. If the berget is bounderish then the berget is bastioned. If something is bastioned then it is undepicted. If something is bounderish and not undepicted then it is ascendent. Kind, bounderish things are ascendent. The berget is bounderish.", "logic": "\nBounderish(berget)\nforall x (Undepicted(x) and Bounderish(x) -> not Interim(x))\nUndepicted(berget) and Interim(berget) -> not Bounderish(berget)\nBounderish(berget) -> Bastioned(berget)\nforall x (Bastioned(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Bounderish(x) and not Undepicted(x) -> Ascendent(x))\nforall x (Bastioned(x) and Bounderish(x) -> Ascendent(x))\n\nBounderish(berget)\n\ntherefore Bounderish(berget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The dael is prongy. Round, prongy things are not powered. If the dael is requisite and the dael is powered then the dael is not prongy. If the dael is prongy then the dael is american. If something is american then it is requisite. If something is prongy and not requisite then it is empathetic. Kind, prongy things are empathetic. The dael is not prongy.", "logic": "\nProngy(dael)\nforall x (Requisite(x) and Prongy(x) -> not Powered(x))\nRequisite(dael) and Powered(dael) -> not Prongy(dael)\nProngy(dael) -> American(dael)\nforall x (American(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) and not Requisite(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (American(x) and Prongy(x) -> Empathetic(x))\n\nnot Prongy(dael)\n\ntherefore Prongy(dael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The rici is forte. Round, forte things are not meshugge. If the rici is physical and the rici is meshugge then the rici is not forte. If the rici is forte then the rici is kittenish. If something is kittenish then it is physical. If something is forte and not physical then it is choral. Kind, forte things are choral. The rici is kittenish.", "logic": "\nForte(rici)\nforall x (Physical(x) and Forte(x) -> not Meshugge(x))\nPhysical(rici) and Meshugge(rici) -> not Forte(rici)\nForte(rici) -> Kittenish(rici)\nforall x (Kittenish(x) -> Physical(x))\nforall x (Forte(x) and not Physical(x) -> Choral(x))\nforall x (Kittenish(x) and Forte(x) -> Choral(x))\n\nKittenish(rici)\n\nForte(rici) and Forte(rici) -> Kittenish(rici) -> therefore Kittenish(rici)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The sayre is monoclinal. Round, monoclinal things are not unmusical. If the sayre is marauding and the sayre is unmusical then the sayre is not monoclinal. If the sayre is monoclinal then the sayre is neurotoxic. If something is neurotoxic then it is marauding. If something is monoclinal and not marauding then it is sharing. Kind, monoclinal things are sharing. The sayre is not neurotoxic.", "logic": "\nMonoclinal(sayre)\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Monoclinal(x) -> not Unmusical(x))\nMarauding(sayre) and Unmusical(sayre) -> not Monoclinal(sayre)\nMonoclinal(sayre) -> Neurotoxic(sayre)\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) and not Marauding(x) -> Sharing(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) and Monoclinal(x) -> Sharing(x))\n\nnot Neurotoxic(sayre)\n\nMonoclinal(sayre) and Monoclinal(sayre) -> Neurotoxic(sayre) -> therefore Neurotoxic(sayre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The hussein is utilized. Round, utilized things are not tractile. If the hussein is plumy and the hussein is tractile then the hussein is not utilized. If the hussein is utilized then the hussein is fistulate. If something is fistulate then it is plumy. If something is utilized and not plumy then it is beatified. Kind, utilized things are beatified. The hussein is beatified.", "logic": "\nUtilized(hussein)\nforall x (Plumy(x) and Utilized(x) -> not Tractile(x))\nPlumy(hussein) and Tractile(hussein) -> not Utilized(hussein)\nUtilized(hussein) -> Fistulate(hussein)\nforall x (Fistulate(x) -> Plumy(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) and not Plumy(x) -> Beatified(x))\nforall x (Fistulate(x) and Utilized(x) -> Beatified(x))\n\nBeatified(hussein)\n\nUtilized(hussein) and Utilized(hussein) -> Fistulate(hussein) -> therefore Fistulate(hussein) Fistulate(hussein) and Utilized(hussein) and forall x (Fistulate(x) and Utilized(x) -> Beatified(x)) -> therefore Beatified(hussein)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The martita is truculent. Round, truculent things are not shrunken. If the martita is stinting and the martita is shrunken then the martita is not truculent. If the martita is truculent then the martita is missionary. If something is missionary then it is stinting. If something is truculent and not stinting then it is caudate. Kind, truculent things are caudate. The martita is not stinting.", "logic": "\nTruculent(martita)\nforall x (Stinting(x) and Truculent(x) -> not Shrunken(x))\nStinting(martita) and Shrunken(martita) -> not Truculent(martita)\nTruculent(martita) -> Missionary(martita)\nforall x (Missionary(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) and not Stinting(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Missionary(x) and Truculent(x) -> Caudate(x))\n\nnot Stinting(martita)\n\nTruculent(martita) and Truculent(martita) -> Missionary(martita) -> therefore Missionary(martita) Missionary(martita) and forall x (Missionary(x) -> Stinting(x)) -> therefore Stinting(martita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The laural is cursorial. Round, cursorial things are not jagged. If the laural is leggy and the laural is jagged then the laural is not cursorial. If the laural is cursorial then the laural is rousseauan. If something is rousseauan then it is leggy. If something is cursorial and not leggy then it is slimed. Kind, cursorial things are slimed. The laural is not jagged.", "logic": "\nCursorial(laural)\nforall x (Leggy(x) and Cursorial(x) -> not Jagged(x))\nLeggy(laural) and Jagged(laural) -> not Cursorial(laural)\nCursorial(laural) -> Rousseauan(laural)\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Leggy(x))\nforall x (Cursorial(x) and not Leggy(x) -> Slimed(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) and Cursorial(x) -> Slimed(x))\n\nnot Jagged(laural)\n\nCursorial(laural) and Cursorial(laural) -> Rousseauan(laural) -> therefore Rousseauan(laural) Rousseauan(laural) and forall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Leggy(x)) -> therefore Leggy(laural) Leggy(laural) and Cursorial(laural) and forall x (Leggy(x) and Cursorial(x) -> not Jagged(x)) -> therefore not Jagged(laural)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The bary is classy. Round, classy things are not doubtful. If the bary is frank and the bary is doubtful then the bary is not classy. If the bary is classy then the bary is roundish. If something is roundish then it is frank. If something is classy and not frank then it is equivocal. Kind, classy things are equivocal. The bary is doubtful.", "logic": "\nClassy(bary)\nforall x (Frank(x) and Classy(x) -> not Doubtful(x))\nFrank(bary) and Doubtful(bary) -> not Classy(bary)\nClassy(bary) -> Roundish(bary)\nforall x (Roundish(x) -> Frank(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) and not Frank(x) -> Equivocal(x))\nforall x (Roundish(x) and Classy(x) -> Equivocal(x))\n\nDoubtful(bary)\n\nClassy(bary) and Classy(bary) -> Roundish(bary) -> therefore Roundish(bary) Roundish(bary) and forall x (Roundish(x) -> Frank(x)) -> therefore Frank(bary) Frank(bary) and Classy(bary) and forall x (Frank(x) and Classy(x) -> not Doubtful(x)) -> therefore not Doubtful(bary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The karen is parted. Round, parted things are not ischemic. If the karen is regal and the karen is ischemic then the karen is not parted. If the karen is parted then the karen is beardown. If something is beardown then it is regal. If something is parted and not regal then it is nonfissile. Kind, parted things are nonfissile. The karen does not like the karen.", "logic": "\nParted(karen)\nforall x (Regal(x) and Parted(x) -> not Ischemic(x))\nRegal(karen) and Ischemic(karen) -> not Parted(karen)\nParted(karen) -> Beardown(karen)\nforall x (Beardown(x) -> Regal(x))\nforall x (Parted(x) and not Regal(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Beardown(x) and Parted(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\n\nnot Likes(karen, karen)\n\nnot Likes(karen, karen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The deirdre is subsonic. Round, subsonic things are not renegade. If the deirdre is corporal and the deirdre is renegade then the deirdre is not subsonic. If the deirdre is subsonic then the deirdre is unwished. If something is unwished then it is corporal. If something is subsonic and not corporal then it is granted. Kind, subsonic things are granted. The deirdre visits the deirdre.", "logic": "\nSubsonic(deirdre)\nforall x (Corporal(x) and Subsonic(x) -> not Renegade(x))\nCorporal(deirdre) and Renegade(deirdre) -> not Subsonic(deirdre)\nSubsonic(deirdre) -> Unwished(deirdre)\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> Corporal(x))\nforall x (Subsonic(x) and not Corporal(x) -> Granted(x))\nforall x (Unwished(x) and Subsonic(x) -> Granted(x))\n\nVisits(deirdre, deirdre)\n\nVisits(deirdre, deirdre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The oliver repair the annnora. The alma is hifalutin. The annnora repair the alma. The yacov valet the alma. If someone repair the alma then they are fretted. If someone ingratiate the alma and they are fretted then they like the yacov. If someone valet the oliver then they see the oliver. If someone valet the annnora and the annnora valet the alma then the annnora valet the yacov. If someone valet the annnora and they see the oliver then they are hifalutin. If someone is occult then they see the alma. If someone is grouchy then they need the oliver. If someone valet the alma then they are grouchy. The annnora repair the alma.", "logic": "\nRepair(oliver, annnora)\nHifalutin(alma)\nRepair(annnora, alma)\nValet(yacov, alma)\nforall x (Repair(x, alma) -> Fretted(x))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, alma) and Fretted(x) -> Ingratiate(x, yacov))\nforall x (Valet(x, oliver) -> Repair(x, oliver))\nforall x (Valet(x, annnora) and Valet(annnora, alma) -> Valet(annnora, yacov))\nforall x (Valet(x, annnora) and Repair(x, oliver) -> Hifalutin(x))\nforall x (Occult(x) -> Repair(x, alma))\nforall x (Grouchy(x) -> Valet(x, oliver))\nforall x (Valet(x, alma) -> Grouchy(x))\n\nRepair(annnora, alma)\n\ntherefore Repair(annnora, alma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The livia clinch the miles. The lanette is shapely. The miles clinch the lanette. The denise topple the lanette. If someone clinch the lanette then they are malodorous. If someone brabble the lanette and they are malodorous then they like the denise. If someone topple the livia then they see the livia. If someone topple the miles and the miles topple the lanette then the miles topple the denise. If someone topple the miles and they see the livia then they are shapely. If someone is aluminous then they see the lanette. If someone is stretchy then they need the livia. If someone topple the lanette then they are stretchy. The lanette is not shapely.", "logic": "\nClinch(livia, miles)\nShapely(lanette)\nClinch(miles, lanette)\nTopple(denise, lanette)\nforall x (Clinch(x, lanette) -> Malodorous(x))\nforall x (Brabble(x, lanette) and Malodorous(x) -> Brabble(x, denise))\nforall x (Topple(x, livia) -> Clinch(x, livia))\nforall x (Topple(x, miles) and Topple(miles, lanette) -> Topple(miles, denise))\nforall x (Topple(x, miles) and Clinch(x, livia) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Aluminous(x) -> Clinch(x, lanette))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Topple(x, livia))\nforall x (Topple(x, lanette) -> Stretchy(x))\n\nnot Shapely(lanette)\n\ntherefore Shapely(lanette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The wilone wall the swen. The phineas is statuesque. The swen wall the phineas. The diamond tiller the phineas. If someone wall the phineas then they are educated. If someone sloganeer the phineas and they are educated then they like the diamond. If someone tiller the wilone then they see the wilone. If someone tiller the swen and the swen tiller the phineas then the swen tiller the diamond. If someone tiller the swen and they see the wilone then they are statuesque. If someone is petite then they see the phineas. If someone is logistic then they need the wilone. If someone tiller the phineas then they are logistic. The swen is educated.", "logic": "\nWall(wilone, swen)\nStatuesque(phineas)\nWall(swen, phineas)\nTiller(diamond, phineas)\nforall x (Wall(x, phineas) -> Educated(x))\nforall x (Sloganeer(x, phineas) and Educated(x) -> Sloganeer(x, diamond))\nforall x (Tiller(x, wilone) -> Wall(x, wilone))\nforall x (Tiller(x, swen) and Tiller(swen, phineas) -> Tiller(swen, diamond))\nforall x (Tiller(x, swen) and Wall(x, wilone) -> Statuesque(x))\nforall x (Petite(x) -> Wall(x, phineas))\nforall x (Logistic(x) -> Tiller(x, wilone))\nforall x (Tiller(x, phineas) -> Logistic(x))\n\nEducated(swen)\n\nWall(swen, phineas) and forall x (Wall(x, phineas) -> Educated(x)) -> therefore Educated(swen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The swen jackrabbit the cornelius. The duncan is cloistered. The cornelius jackrabbit the duncan. The xenos cross the duncan. If someone jackrabbit the duncan then they are fisheye. If someone give the duncan and they are fisheye then they like the xenos. If someone cross the swen then they see the swen. If someone cross the cornelius and the cornelius cross the duncan then the cornelius cross the xenos. If someone cross the cornelius and they see the swen then they are cloistered. If someone is innocuous then they see the duncan. If someone is beaklike then they need the swen. If someone cross the duncan then they are beaklike. The cornelius is not fisheye.", "logic": "\nJackrabbit(swen, cornelius)\nCloistered(duncan)\nJackrabbit(cornelius, duncan)\nCross(xenos, duncan)\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, duncan) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Give(x, duncan) and Fisheye(x) -> Give(x, xenos))\nforall x (Cross(x, swen) -> Jackrabbit(x, swen))\nforall x (Cross(x, cornelius) and Cross(cornelius, duncan) -> Cross(cornelius, xenos))\nforall x (Cross(x, cornelius) and Jackrabbit(x, swen) -> Cloistered(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) -> Jackrabbit(x, duncan))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Cross(x, swen))\nforall x (Cross(x, duncan) -> Beaklike(x))\n\nnot Fisheye(cornelius)\n\nJackrabbit(cornelius, duncan) and forall x (Jackrabbit(x, duncan) -> Fisheye(x)) -> therefore Fisheye(cornelius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The noah cascade the hermann. The burl is fretted. The hermann cascade the burl. The hamish chiromance the burl. If someone cascade the burl then they are calloused. If someone exude the burl and they are calloused then they like the hamish. If someone chiromance the noah then they see the noah. If someone chiromance the hermann and the hermann chiromance the burl then the hermann chiromance the hamish. If someone chiromance the hermann and they see the noah then they are fretted. If someone is coexistent then they see the burl. If someone is acquirable then they need the noah. If someone chiromance the burl then they are acquirable. The hamish chiromance the noah.", "logic": "\nCascade(noah, hermann)\nFretted(burl)\nCascade(hermann, burl)\nChiromance(hamish, burl)\nforall x (Cascade(x, burl) -> Calloused(x))\nforall x (Exude(x, burl) and Calloused(x) -> Exude(x, hamish))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, noah) -> Cascade(x, noah))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, hermann) and Chiromance(hermann, burl) -> Chiromance(hermann, hamish))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, hermann) and Cascade(x, noah) -> Fretted(x))\nforall x (Coexistent(x) -> Cascade(x, burl))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) -> Chiromance(x, noah))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, burl) -> Acquirable(x))\n\nChiromance(hamish, noah)\n\nChiromance(hamish, burl) and forall x (Chiromance(x, burl) -> Acquirable(x)) -> therefore Acquirable(hamish) Acquirable(hamish) and forall x (Acquirable(x) -> Chiromance(x, noah)) -> therefore Chiromance(hamish, noah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The hillel probate the gigi. The bancroft is indiscreet. The gigi probate the bancroft. The tersina outplay the bancroft. If someone probate the bancroft then they are neuronal. If someone carburet the bancroft and they are neuronal then they like the tersina. If someone outplay the hillel then they see the hillel. If someone outplay the gigi and the gigi outplay the bancroft then the gigi outplay the tersina. If someone outplay the gigi and they see the hillel then they are indiscreet. If someone is haywire then they see the bancroft. If someone is aroused then they need the hillel. If someone outplay the bancroft then they are aroused. The tersina does not need the hillel.", "logic": "\nProbate(hillel, gigi)\nIndiscreet(bancroft)\nProbate(gigi, bancroft)\nOutplay(tersina, bancroft)\nforall x (Probate(x, bancroft) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Carburet(x, bancroft) and Neuronal(x) -> Carburet(x, tersina))\nforall x (Outplay(x, hillel) -> Probate(x, hillel))\nforall x (Outplay(x, gigi) and Outplay(gigi, bancroft) -> Outplay(gigi, tersina))\nforall x (Outplay(x, gigi) and Probate(x, hillel) -> Indiscreet(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Probate(x, bancroft))\nforall x (Aroused(x) -> Outplay(x, hillel))\nforall x (Outplay(x, bancroft) -> Aroused(x))\n\nnot Outplay(tersina, hillel)\n\nOutplay(tersina, bancroft) and forall x (Outplay(x, bancroft) -> Aroused(x)) -> therefore Aroused(tersina) Aroused(tersina) and forall x (Aroused(x) -> Outplay(x, hillel)) -> therefore Outplay(tersina, hillel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The evvy hose the tessy. The carrissa is cuplike. The tessy hose the carrissa. The richard outwear the carrissa. If someone hose the carrissa then they are untested. If someone comply the carrissa and they are untested then they like the richard. If someone outwear the evvy then they see the evvy. If someone outwear the tessy and the tessy outwear the carrissa then the tessy outwear the richard. If someone outwear the tessy and they see the evvy then they are cuplike. If someone is impalpable then they see the carrissa. If someone is cosmogenic then they need the evvy. If someone outwear the carrissa then they are cosmogenic. The richard hose the evvy.", "logic": "\nHose(evvy, tessy)\nCuplike(carrissa)\nHose(tessy, carrissa)\nOutwear(richard, carrissa)\nforall x (Hose(x, carrissa) -> Untested(x))\nforall x (Comply(x, carrissa) and Untested(x) -> Comply(x, richard))\nforall x (Outwear(x, evvy) -> Hose(x, evvy))\nforall x (Outwear(x, tessy) and Outwear(tessy, carrissa) -> Outwear(tessy, richard))\nforall x (Outwear(x, tessy) and Hose(x, evvy) -> Cuplike(x))\nforall x (Impalpable(x) -> Hose(x, carrissa))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) -> Outwear(x, evvy))\nforall x (Outwear(x, carrissa) -> Cosmogenic(x))\n\nHose(richard, evvy)\n\nOutwear(richard, carrissa) and forall x (Outwear(x, carrissa) -> Cosmogenic(x)) -> therefore Cosmogenic(richard) Cosmogenic(richard) and forall x (Cosmogenic(x) -> Outwear(x, evvy)) -> therefore Outwear(richard, evvy) Outwear(richard, evvy) and forall x (Outwear(x, evvy) -> Hose(x, evvy)) -> therefore Hose(richard, evvy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The roxie tiller the naoma. The umeko is cuboid. The naoma tiller the umeko. The dena flame the umeko. If someone tiller the umeko then they are agnostic. If someone ruckle the umeko and they are agnostic then they like the dena. If someone flame the roxie then they see the roxie. If someone flame the naoma and the naoma flame the umeko then the naoma flame the dena. If someone flame the naoma and they see the roxie then they are cuboid. If someone is statuary then they see the umeko. If someone is untilled then they need the roxie. If someone flame the umeko then they are untilled. The dena does not see the roxie.", "logic": "\nTiller(roxie, naoma)\nCuboid(umeko)\nTiller(naoma, umeko)\nFlame(dena, umeko)\nforall x (Tiller(x, umeko) -> Agnostic(x))\nforall x (Ruckle(x, umeko) and Agnostic(x) -> Ruckle(x, dena))\nforall x (Flame(x, roxie) -> Tiller(x, roxie))\nforall x (Flame(x, naoma) and Flame(naoma, umeko) -> Flame(naoma, dena))\nforall x (Flame(x, naoma) and Tiller(x, roxie) -> Cuboid(x))\nforall x (Statuary(x) -> Tiller(x, umeko))\nforall x (Untilled(x) -> Flame(x, roxie))\nforall x (Flame(x, umeko) -> Untilled(x))\n\nnot Tiller(dena, roxie)\n\nFlame(dena, umeko) and forall x (Flame(x, umeko) -> Untilled(x)) -> therefore Untilled(dena) Untilled(dena) and forall x (Untilled(x) -> Flame(x, roxie)) -> therefore Flame(dena, roxie) Flame(dena, roxie) and forall x (Flame(x, roxie) -> Tiller(x, roxie)) -> therefore Tiller(dena, roxie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The cortney blunt the gen. The annmarie is languid. The gen blunt the annmarie. The chrystal finedraw the annmarie. If someone blunt the annmarie then they are overbusy. If someone patter the annmarie and they are overbusy then they like the chrystal. If someone finedraw the cortney then they see the cortney. If someone finedraw the gen and the gen finedraw the annmarie then the gen finedraw the chrystal. If someone finedraw the gen and they see the cortney then they are languid. If someone is lean then they see the annmarie. If someone is empowered then they need the cortney. If someone finedraw the annmarie then they are empowered. The cortney does not like the chrystal.", "logic": "\nBlunt(cortney, gen)\nLanguid(annmarie)\nBlunt(gen, annmarie)\nFinedraw(chrystal, annmarie)\nforall x (Blunt(x, annmarie) -> Overbusy(x))\nforall x (Patter(x, annmarie) and Overbusy(x) -> Patter(x, chrystal))\nforall x (Finedraw(x, cortney) -> Blunt(x, cortney))\nforall x (Finedraw(x, gen) and Finedraw(gen, annmarie) -> Finedraw(gen, chrystal))\nforall x (Finedraw(x, gen) and Blunt(x, cortney) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Lean(x) -> Blunt(x, annmarie))\nforall x (Empowered(x) -> Finedraw(x, cortney))\nforall x (Finedraw(x, annmarie) -> Empowered(x))\n\nnot Patter(cortney, chrystal)\n\nforall x (Patter(x, annmarie) and Overbusy(x) -> Patter(x, chrystal)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The gabriello reline the chicky. The hertha is labile. The chicky reline the hertha. The elli resubmit the hertha. If someone reline the hertha then they are frisian. If someone acquiesce the hertha and they are frisian then they like the elli. If someone resubmit the gabriello then they see the gabriello. If someone resubmit the chicky and the chicky resubmit the hertha then the chicky resubmit the elli. If someone resubmit the chicky and they see the gabriello then they are labile. If someone is busybodied then they see the hertha. If someone is bigheaded then they need the gabriello. If someone resubmit the hertha then they are bigheaded. The chicky is bigheaded.", "logic": "\nReline(gabriello, chicky)\nLabile(hertha)\nReline(chicky, hertha)\nResubmit(elli, hertha)\nforall x (Reline(x, hertha) -> Frisian(x))\nforall x (Acquiesce(x, hertha) and Frisian(x) -> Acquiesce(x, elli))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, gabriello) -> Reline(x, gabriello))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, chicky) and Resubmit(chicky, hertha) -> Resubmit(chicky, elli))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, chicky) and Reline(x, gabriello) -> Labile(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) -> Reline(x, hertha))\nforall x (Bigheaded(x) -> Resubmit(x, gabriello))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, hertha) -> Bigheaded(x))\n\nBigheaded(chicky)\n\nforall x (Resubmit(x, hertha) -> Bigheaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The griff indicate the jennee. The kirstyn is wayward. The jennee indicate the kirstyn. The kalman apperceive the kirstyn. If someone indicate the kirstyn then they are pneumonic. If someone expand the kirstyn and they are pneumonic then they like the kalman. If someone apperceive the griff then they see the griff. If someone apperceive the jennee and the jennee apperceive the kirstyn then the jennee apperceive the kalman. If someone apperceive the jennee and they see the griff then they are wayward. If someone is antitoxic then they see the kirstyn. If someone is grieving then they need the griff. If someone apperceive the kirstyn then they are grieving. The kalman does not like the kalman.", "logic": "\nIndicate(griff, jennee)\nWayward(kirstyn)\nIndicate(jennee, kirstyn)\nApperceive(kalman, kirstyn)\nforall x (Indicate(x, kirstyn) -> Pneumonic(x))\nforall x (Expand(x, kirstyn) and Pneumonic(x) -> Expand(x, kalman))\nforall x (Apperceive(x, griff) -> Indicate(x, griff))\nforall x (Apperceive(x, jennee) and Apperceive(jennee, kirstyn) -> Apperceive(jennee, kalman))\nforall x (Apperceive(x, jennee) and Indicate(x, griff) -> Wayward(x))\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) -> Indicate(x, kirstyn))\nforall x (Grieving(x) -> Apperceive(x, griff))\nforall x (Apperceive(x, kirstyn) -> Grieving(x))\n\nnot Expand(kalman, kalman)\n\nforall x (Expand(x, kirstyn) and Pneumonic(x) -> Expand(x, kalman)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The marlee woosh the deryl. The konstance is solved. The deryl woosh the konstance. The susi melanize the konstance. If someone woosh the konstance then they are walleyed. If someone shmoose the konstance and they are walleyed then they like the susi. If someone melanize the marlee then they see the marlee. If someone melanize the deryl and the deryl melanize the konstance then the deryl melanize the susi. If someone melanize the deryl and they see the marlee then they are solved. If someone is equivalent then they see the konstance. If someone is overt then they need the marlee. If someone melanize the konstance then they are overt. The konstance woosh the marlee.", "logic": "\nWoosh(marlee, deryl)\nSolved(konstance)\nWoosh(deryl, konstance)\nMelanize(susi, konstance)\nforall x (Woosh(x, konstance) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Shmoose(x, konstance) and Walleyed(x) -> Shmoose(x, susi))\nforall x (Melanize(x, marlee) -> Woosh(x, marlee))\nforall x (Melanize(x, deryl) and Melanize(deryl, konstance) -> Melanize(deryl, susi))\nforall x (Melanize(x, deryl) and Woosh(x, marlee) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Equivalent(x) -> Woosh(x, konstance))\nforall x (Overt(x) -> Melanize(x, marlee))\nforall x (Melanize(x, konstance) -> Overt(x))\n\nWoosh(konstance, marlee)\n\nforall x (Melanize(x, marlee) -> Woosh(x, marlee)) <- forall x (Overt(x) -> Melanize(x, marlee)) <- forall x (Melanize(x, konstance) -> Overt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The barn powwow the norean. The shimon is publicized. The norean powwow the shimon. The bertram twig the shimon. If someone powwow the shimon then they are adipose. If someone homer the shimon and they are adipose then they like the bertram. If someone twig the barn then they see the barn. If someone twig the norean and the norean twig the shimon then the norean twig the bertram. If someone twig the norean and they see the barn then they are publicized. If someone is misshapen then they see the shimon. If someone is predaceous then they need the barn. If someone twig the shimon then they are predaceous. The norean does not like the norean.", "logic": "\nPowwow(barn, norean)\nPublicized(shimon)\nPowwow(norean, shimon)\nTwig(bertram, shimon)\nforall x (Powwow(x, shimon) -> Adipose(x))\nforall x (Homer(x, shimon) and Adipose(x) -> Homer(x, bertram))\nforall x (Twig(x, barn) -> Powwow(x, barn))\nforall x (Twig(x, norean) and Twig(norean, shimon) -> Twig(norean, bertram))\nforall x (Twig(x, norean) and Powwow(x, barn) -> Publicized(x))\nforall x (Misshapen(x) -> Powwow(x, shimon))\nforall x (Predaceous(x) -> Twig(x, barn))\nforall x (Twig(x, shimon) -> Predaceous(x))\n\nnot Homer(norean, norean)\n\nnot Homer(norean, norean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The elvera infuscate the charmain. The alexa is weaponless. The charmain infuscate the alexa. The manuel bungle the alexa. If someone infuscate the alexa then they are northerly. If someone contribute the alexa and they are northerly then they like the manuel. If someone bungle the elvera then they see the elvera. If someone bungle the charmain and the charmain bungle the alexa then the charmain bungle the manuel. If someone bungle the charmain and they see the elvera then they are weaponless. If someone is childly then they see the alexa. If someone is solemn then they need the elvera. If someone bungle the alexa then they are solemn. The charmain is young.", "logic": "\nInfuscate(elvera, charmain)\nWeaponless(alexa)\nInfuscate(charmain, alexa)\nBungle(manuel, alexa)\nforall x (Infuscate(x, alexa) -> Northerly(x))\nforall x (Contribute(x, alexa) and Northerly(x) -> Contribute(x, manuel))\nforall x (Bungle(x, elvera) -> Infuscate(x, elvera))\nforall x (Bungle(x, charmain) and Bungle(charmain, alexa) -> Bungle(charmain, manuel))\nforall x (Bungle(x, charmain) and Infuscate(x, elvera) -> Weaponless(x))\nforall x (Childly(x) -> Infuscate(x, alexa))\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Bungle(x, elvera))\nforall x (Bungle(x, alexa) -> Solemn(x))\n\nYoung(charmain)\n\nYoung(charmain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The alexander forestall the yance. The stacia is lxxxi. The yance forestall the stacia. The alisha order the stacia. If someone forestall the stacia then they are slivery. If someone snowball the stacia and they are slivery then they like the alisha. If someone order the alexander then they see the alexander. If someone order the yance and the yance order the stacia then the yance order the alisha. If someone order the yance and they see the alexander then they are lxxxi. If someone is bridal then they see the stacia. If someone is uncousinly then they need the alexander. If someone order the stacia then they are uncousinly. The alisha does not like the stacia.", "logic": "\nForestall(alexander, yance)\nLxxxi(stacia)\nForestall(yance, stacia)\nOrder(alisha, stacia)\nforall x (Forestall(x, stacia) -> Slivery(x))\nforall x (Snowball(x, stacia) and Slivery(x) -> Snowball(x, alisha))\nforall x (Order(x, alexander) -> Forestall(x, alexander))\nforall x (Order(x, yance) and Order(yance, stacia) -> Order(yance, alisha))\nforall x (Order(x, yance) and Forestall(x, alexander) -> Lxxxi(x))\nforall x (Bridal(x) -> Forestall(x, stacia))\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Order(x, alexander))\nforall x (Order(x, stacia) -> Uncousinly(x))\n\nnot Snowball(alisha, stacia)\n\nnot Snowball(alisha, stacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The ingaberg fill the meade. The romonda is playful. The meade fill the romonda. The franky redirect the romonda. If someone fill the romonda then they are procumbent. If someone marble the romonda and they are procumbent then they like the franky. If someone redirect the ingaberg then they see the ingaberg. If someone redirect the meade and the meade redirect the romonda then the meade redirect the franky. If someone redirect the meade and they see the ingaberg then they are playful. If someone is echoic then they see the romonda. If someone is convergent then they need the ingaberg. If someone redirect the romonda then they are convergent. The meade is echoic.", "logic": "\nFill(ingaberg, meade)\nPlayful(romonda)\nFill(meade, romonda)\nRedirect(franky, romonda)\nforall x (Fill(x, romonda) -> Procumbent(x))\nforall x (Marble(x, romonda) and Procumbent(x) -> Marble(x, franky))\nforall x (Redirect(x, ingaberg) -> Fill(x, ingaberg))\nforall x (Redirect(x, meade) and Redirect(meade, romonda) -> Redirect(meade, franky))\nforall x (Redirect(x, meade) and Fill(x, ingaberg) -> Playful(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) -> Fill(x, romonda))\nforall x (Convergent(x) -> Redirect(x, ingaberg))\nforall x (Redirect(x, romonda) -> Convergent(x))\n\nEchoic(meade)\n\nEchoic(meade) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The candice is anchoritic. The candice is quaggy. The candice is insightful. The candice metrify the dasie. The candice totter the lisette. The candice becalm the lisette. The dasie is insightful. The dasie totter the candice. The dasie becalm the lisette. The lisette is quaggy. The lisette is insightful. The lisette totter the dasie. If someone totter the candice then they like the candice. If someone becalm the candice then the candice is inverted. If someone metrify the candice then the candice becalm the dasie. If someone is quaggy and they need the dasie then the dasie becalm the candice. If someone totter the candice then the candice totter the lisette. If someone is inverted and they like the dasie then the dasie totter the lisette. The candice metrify the dasie.", "logic": "\nAnchoritic(candice)\nQuaggy(candice)\nInsightful(candice)\nMetrify(candice, dasie)\nTotter(candice, lisette)\nBecalm(candice, lisette)\nInsightful(dasie)\nTotter(dasie, candice)\nBecalm(dasie, lisette)\nQuaggy(lisette)\nInsightful(lisette)\nTotter(lisette, dasie)\nforall x (Totter(x, candice) -> Metrify(x, candice))\nforall x (Becalm(x, candice) -> Inverted(candice))\nforall x (Metrify(x, candice) -> Becalm(candice, dasie))\nforall x (Quaggy(x) and Totter(x, dasie) -> Becalm(dasie, candice))\nforall x (Totter(x, candice) -> Totter(candice, lisette))\nforall x (Inverted(x) and Metrify(x, dasie) -> Totter(dasie, lisette))\n\nMetrify(candice, dasie)\n\ntherefore Metrify(candice, dasie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The beatrice is asian. The beatrice is crack. The beatrice is cashed. The beatrice glut the florian. The beatrice animize the garret. The beatrice fantasise the garret. The florian is cashed. The florian animize the beatrice. The florian fantasise the garret. The garret is crack. The garret is cashed. The garret animize the florian. If someone animize the beatrice then they like the beatrice. If someone fantasise the beatrice then the beatrice is assistant. If someone glut the beatrice then the beatrice fantasise the florian. If someone is crack and they need the florian then the florian fantasise the beatrice. If someone animize the beatrice then the beatrice animize the garret. If someone is assistant and they like the florian then the florian animize the garret. The beatrice is not crack.", "logic": "\nAsian(beatrice)\nCrack(beatrice)\nCashed(beatrice)\nGlut(beatrice, florian)\nAnimize(beatrice, garret)\nFantasise(beatrice, garret)\nCashed(florian)\nAnimize(florian, beatrice)\nFantasise(florian, garret)\nCrack(garret)\nCashed(garret)\nAnimize(garret, florian)\nforall x (Animize(x, beatrice) -> Glut(x, beatrice))\nforall x (Fantasise(x, beatrice) -> Assistant(beatrice))\nforall x (Glut(x, beatrice) -> Fantasise(beatrice, florian))\nforall x (Crack(x) and Animize(x, florian) -> Fantasise(florian, beatrice))\nforall x (Animize(x, beatrice) -> Animize(beatrice, garret))\nforall x (Assistant(x) and Glut(x, florian) -> Animize(florian, garret))\n\nnot Crack(beatrice)\n\ntherefore Crack(beatrice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The romona is ungracious. The romona is identified. The romona is shaky. The romona hope the dody. The romona floor the stern. The romona exorcize the stern. The dody is shaky. The dody floor the romona. The dody exorcize the stern. The stern is identified. The stern is shaky. The stern floor the dody. If someone floor the romona then they like the romona. If someone exorcize the romona then the romona is tawdry. If someone hope the romona then the romona exorcize the dody. If someone is identified and they need the dody then the dody exorcize the romona. If someone floor the romona then the romona floor the stern. If someone is tawdry and they like the dody then the dody floor the stern. The dody hope the romona.", "logic": "\nUngracious(romona)\nIdentified(romona)\nShaky(romona)\nHope(romona, dody)\nFloor(romona, stern)\nExorcize(romona, stern)\nShaky(dody)\nFloor(dody, romona)\nExorcize(dody, stern)\nIdentified(stern)\nShaky(stern)\nFloor(stern, dody)\nforall x (Floor(x, romona) -> Hope(x, romona))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, romona) -> Tawdry(romona))\nforall x (Hope(x, romona) -> Exorcize(romona, dody))\nforall x (Identified(x) and Floor(x, dody) -> Exorcize(dody, romona))\nforall x (Floor(x, romona) -> Floor(romona, stern))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) and Hope(x, dody) -> Floor(dody, stern))\n\nHope(dody, romona)\n\nFloor(dody, romona) and forall x (Floor(x, romona) -> Hope(x, romona)) -> therefore Hope(dody, romona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The harriette is napping. The harriette is model. The harriette is unwelcome. The harriette madrigal the etienne. The harriette earth the zena. The harriette marble the zena. The etienne is unwelcome. The etienne earth the harriette. The etienne marble the zena. The zena is model. The zena is unwelcome. The zena earth the etienne. If someone earth the harriette then they like the harriette. If someone marble the harriette then the harriette is alimentary. If someone madrigal the harriette then the harriette marble the etienne. If someone is model and they need the etienne then the etienne marble the harriette. If someone earth the harriette then the harriette earth the zena. If someone is alimentary and they like the etienne then the etienne earth the zena. The etienne does not visit the harriette.", "logic": "\nNapping(harriette)\nModel(harriette)\nUnwelcome(harriette)\nMadrigal(harriette, etienne)\nEarth(harriette, zena)\nMarble(harriette, zena)\nUnwelcome(etienne)\nEarth(etienne, harriette)\nMarble(etienne, zena)\nModel(zena)\nUnwelcome(zena)\nEarth(zena, etienne)\nforall x (Earth(x, harriette) -> Madrigal(x, harriette))\nforall x (Marble(x, harriette) -> Alimentary(harriette))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, harriette) -> Marble(harriette, etienne))\nforall x (Model(x) and Earth(x, etienne) -> Marble(etienne, harriette))\nforall x (Earth(x, harriette) -> Earth(harriette, zena))\nforall x (Alimentary(x) and Madrigal(x, etienne) -> Earth(etienne, zena))\n\nnot Marble(etienne, harriette)\n\nModel(zena) and Earth(zena, etienne) and forall x (Model(x) and Earth(x, etienne) -> Marble(etienne, harriette)) -> therefore Marble(etienne, harriette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The timothea is aeolian. The timothea is campanular. The timothea is eradicable. The timothea terrorize the hyacinth. The timothea braise the jena. The timothea harpoon the jena. The hyacinth is eradicable. The hyacinth braise the timothea. The hyacinth harpoon the jena. The jena is campanular. The jena is eradicable. The jena braise the hyacinth. If someone braise the timothea then they like the timothea. If someone harpoon the timothea then the timothea is teenaged. If someone terrorize the timothea then the timothea harpoon the hyacinth. If someone is campanular and they need the hyacinth then the hyacinth harpoon the timothea. If someone braise the timothea then the timothea braise the jena. If someone is teenaged and they like the hyacinth then the hyacinth braise the jena. The timothea harpoon the hyacinth.", "logic": "\nAeolian(timothea)\nCampanular(timothea)\nEradicable(timothea)\nTerrorize(timothea, hyacinth)\nBraise(timothea, jena)\nHarpoon(timothea, jena)\nEradicable(hyacinth)\nBraise(hyacinth, timothea)\nHarpoon(hyacinth, jena)\nCampanular(jena)\nEradicable(jena)\nBraise(jena, hyacinth)\nforall x (Braise(x, timothea) -> Terrorize(x, timothea))\nforall x (Harpoon(x, timothea) -> Teenaged(timothea))\nforall x (Terrorize(x, timothea) -> Harpoon(timothea, hyacinth))\nforall x (Campanular(x) and Braise(x, hyacinth) -> Harpoon(hyacinth, timothea))\nforall x (Braise(x, timothea) -> Braise(timothea, jena))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) and Terrorize(x, hyacinth) -> Braise(hyacinth, jena))\n\nHarpoon(timothea, hyacinth)\n\nBraise(hyacinth, timothea) and forall x (Braise(x, timothea) -> Terrorize(x, timothea)) -> therefore Terrorize(hyacinth, timothea) Terrorize(hyacinth, timothea) and forall x (Terrorize(x, timothea) -> Harpoon(timothea, hyacinth)) -> therefore Harpoon(timothea, hyacinth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The brodie is obsolete. The brodie is bursal. The brodie is uricosuric. The brodie reallot the maryjo. The brodie sizz the amandi. The brodie parrot the amandi. The maryjo is uricosuric. The maryjo sizz the brodie. The maryjo parrot the amandi. The amandi is bursal. The amandi is uricosuric. The amandi sizz the maryjo. If someone sizz the brodie then they like the brodie. If someone parrot the brodie then the brodie is pyloric. If someone reallot the brodie then the brodie parrot the maryjo. If someone is bursal and they need the maryjo then the maryjo parrot the brodie. If someone sizz the brodie then the brodie sizz the amandi. If someone is pyloric and they like the maryjo then the maryjo sizz the amandi. The brodie does not visit the maryjo.", "logic": "\nObsolete(brodie)\nBursal(brodie)\nUricosuric(brodie)\nReallot(brodie, maryjo)\nSizz(brodie, amandi)\nParrot(brodie, amandi)\nUricosuric(maryjo)\nSizz(maryjo, brodie)\nParrot(maryjo, amandi)\nBursal(amandi)\nUricosuric(amandi)\nSizz(amandi, maryjo)\nforall x (Sizz(x, brodie) -> Reallot(x, brodie))\nforall x (Parrot(x, brodie) -> Pyloric(brodie))\nforall x (Reallot(x, brodie) -> Parrot(brodie, maryjo))\nforall x (Bursal(x) and Sizz(x, maryjo) -> Parrot(maryjo, brodie))\nforall x (Sizz(x, brodie) -> Sizz(brodie, amandi))\nforall x (Pyloric(x) and Reallot(x, maryjo) -> Sizz(maryjo, amandi))\n\nnot Parrot(brodie, maryjo)\n\nSizz(maryjo, brodie) and forall x (Sizz(x, brodie) -> Reallot(x, brodie)) -> therefore Reallot(maryjo, brodie) Reallot(maryjo, brodie) and forall x (Reallot(x, brodie) -> Parrot(brodie, maryjo)) -> therefore Parrot(brodie, maryjo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The nita is refutable. The nita is ramose. The nita is monogynic. The nita validate the maryellen. The nita staunch the lisetta. The nita trill the lisetta. The maryellen is monogynic. The maryellen staunch the nita. The maryellen trill the lisetta. The lisetta is ramose. The lisetta is monogynic. The lisetta staunch the maryellen. If someone staunch the nita then they like the nita. If someone trill the nita then the nita is unvarying. If someone validate the nita then the nita trill the maryellen. If someone is ramose and they need the maryellen then the maryellen trill the nita. If someone staunch the nita then the nita staunch the lisetta. If someone is unvarying and they like the maryellen then the maryellen staunch the lisetta. The maryellen staunch the lisetta.", "logic": "\nRefutable(nita)\nRamose(nita)\nMonogynic(nita)\nValidate(nita, maryellen)\nStaunch(nita, lisetta)\nTrill(nita, lisetta)\nMonogynic(maryellen)\nStaunch(maryellen, nita)\nTrill(maryellen, lisetta)\nRamose(lisetta)\nMonogynic(lisetta)\nStaunch(lisetta, maryellen)\nforall x (Staunch(x, nita) -> Validate(x, nita))\nforall x (Trill(x, nita) -> Unvarying(nita))\nforall x (Validate(x, nita) -> Trill(nita, maryellen))\nforall x (Ramose(x) and Staunch(x, maryellen) -> Trill(maryellen, nita))\nforall x (Staunch(x, nita) -> Staunch(nita, lisetta))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) and Validate(x, maryellen) -> Staunch(maryellen, lisetta))\n\nStaunch(maryellen, lisetta)\n\nRamose(lisetta) and Staunch(lisetta, maryellen) and forall x (Ramose(x) and Staunch(x, maryellen) -> Trill(maryellen, nita)) -> therefore Trill(maryellen, nita) Trill(maryellen, nita) and forall x (Trill(x, nita) -> Unvarying(nita)) -> therefore Unvarying(nita) Unvarying(nita) and Validate(nita, maryellen) and forall x (Unvarying(x) and Validate(x, maryellen) -> Staunch(maryellen, lisetta)) -> therefore Staunch(maryellen, lisetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The lamont is sabahan. The lamont is biface. The lamont is marketable. The lamont trap the stanwood. The lamont bless the melisa. The lamont feast the melisa. The stanwood is marketable. The stanwood bless the lamont. The stanwood feast the melisa. The melisa is biface. The melisa is marketable. The melisa bless the stanwood. If someone bless the lamont then they like the lamont. If someone feast the lamont then the lamont is unpleasant. If someone trap the lamont then the lamont feast the stanwood. If someone is biface and they need the stanwood then the stanwood feast the lamont. If someone bless the lamont then the lamont bless the melisa. If someone is unpleasant and they like the stanwood then the stanwood bless the melisa. The stanwood does not need the melisa.", "logic": "\nSabahan(lamont)\nBiface(lamont)\nMarketable(lamont)\nTrap(lamont, stanwood)\nBless(lamont, melisa)\nFeast(lamont, melisa)\nMarketable(stanwood)\nBless(stanwood, lamont)\nFeast(stanwood, melisa)\nBiface(melisa)\nMarketable(melisa)\nBless(melisa, stanwood)\nforall x (Bless(x, lamont) -> Trap(x, lamont))\nforall x (Feast(x, lamont) -> Unpleasant(lamont))\nforall x (Trap(x, lamont) -> Feast(lamont, stanwood))\nforall x (Biface(x) and Bless(x, stanwood) -> Feast(stanwood, lamont))\nforall x (Bless(x, lamont) -> Bless(lamont, melisa))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Trap(x, stanwood) -> Bless(stanwood, melisa))\n\nnot Bless(stanwood, melisa)\n\nBiface(melisa) and Bless(melisa, stanwood) and forall x (Biface(x) and Bless(x, stanwood) -> Feast(stanwood, lamont)) -> therefore Feast(stanwood, lamont) Feast(stanwood, lamont) and forall x (Feast(x, lamont) -> Unpleasant(lamont)) -> therefore Unpleasant(lamont) Unpleasant(lamont) and Trap(lamont, stanwood) and forall x (Unpleasant(x) and Trap(x, stanwood) -> Bless(stanwood, melisa)) -> therefore Bless(stanwood, melisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The micheline is hilarious. The micheline is pressed. The micheline is rhomboid. The micheline checkmate the meggie. The micheline damn the temple. The micheline scupper the temple. The meggie is rhomboid. The meggie damn the micheline. The meggie scupper the temple. The temple is pressed. The temple is rhomboid. The temple damn the meggie. If someone damn the micheline then they like the micheline. If someone scupper the micheline then the micheline is secondhand. If someone checkmate the micheline then the micheline scupper the meggie. If someone is pressed and they need the meggie then the meggie scupper the micheline. If someone damn the micheline then the micheline damn the temple. If someone is secondhand and they like the meggie then the meggie damn the temple. The micheline does not like the micheline.", "logic": "\nHilarious(micheline)\nPressed(micheline)\nRhomboid(micheline)\nCheckmate(micheline, meggie)\nDamn(micheline, temple)\nScupper(micheline, temple)\nRhomboid(meggie)\nDamn(meggie, micheline)\nScupper(meggie, temple)\nPressed(temple)\nRhomboid(temple)\nDamn(temple, meggie)\nforall x (Damn(x, micheline) -> Checkmate(x, micheline))\nforall x (Scupper(x, micheline) -> Secondhand(micheline))\nforall x (Checkmate(x, micheline) -> Scupper(micheline, meggie))\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Damn(x, meggie) -> Scupper(meggie, micheline))\nforall x (Damn(x, micheline) -> Damn(micheline, temple))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Checkmate(x, meggie) -> Damn(meggie, temple))\n\nnot Checkmate(micheline, micheline)\n\nforall x (Damn(x, micheline) -> Checkmate(x, micheline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The ettie is wizen. The ettie is alliaceous. The ettie is insoluble. The ettie antedate the maxfield. The ettie suborn the baily. The ettie cornice the baily. The maxfield is insoluble. The maxfield suborn the ettie. The maxfield cornice the baily. The baily is alliaceous. The baily is insoluble. The baily suborn the maxfield. If someone suborn the ettie then they like the ettie. If someone cornice the ettie then the ettie is unicuspid. If someone antedate the ettie then the ettie cornice the maxfield. If someone is alliaceous and they need the maxfield then the maxfield cornice the ettie. If someone suborn the ettie then the ettie suborn the baily. If someone is unicuspid and they like the maxfield then the maxfield suborn the baily. The baily antedate the ettie.", "logic": "\nWizen(ettie)\nAlliaceous(ettie)\nInsoluble(ettie)\nAntedate(ettie, maxfield)\nSuborn(ettie, baily)\nCornice(ettie, baily)\nInsoluble(maxfield)\nSuborn(maxfield, ettie)\nCornice(maxfield, baily)\nAlliaceous(baily)\nInsoluble(baily)\nSuborn(baily, maxfield)\nforall x (Suborn(x, ettie) -> Antedate(x, ettie))\nforall x (Cornice(x, ettie) -> Unicuspid(ettie))\nforall x (Antedate(x, ettie) -> Cornice(ettie, maxfield))\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) and Suborn(x, maxfield) -> Cornice(maxfield, ettie))\nforall x (Suborn(x, ettie) -> Suborn(ettie, baily))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) and Antedate(x, maxfield) -> Suborn(maxfield, baily))\n\nAntedate(baily, ettie)\n\nforall x (Suborn(x, ettie) -> Antedate(x, ettie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The britta is chartreuse. The britta is acetabular. The britta is genital. The britta intercede the eugenie. The britta retrovert the emmalynn. The britta abstain the emmalynn. The eugenie is genital. The eugenie retrovert the britta. The eugenie abstain the emmalynn. The emmalynn is acetabular. The emmalynn is genital. The emmalynn retrovert the eugenie. If someone retrovert the britta then they like the britta. If someone abstain the britta then the britta is desecrated. If someone intercede the britta then the britta abstain the eugenie. If someone is acetabular and they need the eugenie then the eugenie abstain the britta. If someone retrovert the britta then the britta retrovert the emmalynn. If someone is desecrated and they like the eugenie then the eugenie retrovert the emmalynn. The eugenie is not young.", "logic": "\nChartreuse(britta)\nAcetabular(britta)\nGenital(britta)\nIntercede(britta, eugenie)\nRetrovert(britta, emmalynn)\nAbstain(britta, emmalynn)\nGenital(eugenie)\nRetrovert(eugenie, britta)\nAbstain(eugenie, emmalynn)\nAcetabular(emmalynn)\nGenital(emmalynn)\nRetrovert(emmalynn, eugenie)\nforall x (Retrovert(x, britta) -> Intercede(x, britta))\nforall x (Abstain(x, britta) -> Desecrated(britta))\nforall x (Intercede(x, britta) -> Abstain(britta, eugenie))\nforall x (Acetabular(x) and Retrovert(x, eugenie) -> Abstain(eugenie, britta))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, britta) -> Retrovert(britta, emmalynn))\nforall x (Desecrated(x) and Intercede(x, eugenie) -> Retrovert(eugenie, emmalynn))\n\nnot Young(eugenie)\n\nnot Young(eugenie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The olimpia is elliptic. The olimpia is tantamount. The olimpia is dandy. The olimpia trammel the harlie. The olimpia transfix the loralee. The olimpia account the loralee. The harlie is dandy. The harlie transfix the olimpia. The harlie account the loralee. The loralee is tantamount. The loralee is dandy. The loralee transfix the harlie. If someone transfix the olimpia then they like the olimpia. If someone account the olimpia then the olimpia is elapsed. If someone trammel the olimpia then the olimpia account the harlie. If someone is tantamount and they need the harlie then the harlie account the olimpia. If someone transfix the olimpia then the olimpia transfix the loralee. If someone is elapsed and they like the harlie then the harlie transfix the loralee. The harlie trammel the loralee.", "logic": "\nElliptic(olimpia)\nTantamount(olimpia)\nDandy(olimpia)\nTrammel(olimpia, harlie)\nTransfix(olimpia, loralee)\nAccount(olimpia, loralee)\nDandy(harlie)\nTransfix(harlie, olimpia)\nAccount(harlie, loralee)\nTantamount(loralee)\nDandy(loralee)\nTransfix(loralee, harlie)\nforall x (Transfix(x, olimpia) -> Trammel(x, olimpia))\nforall x (Account(x, olimpia) -> Elapsed(olimpia))\nforall x (Trammel(x, olimpia) -> Account(olimpia, harlie))\nforall x (Tantamount(x) and Transfix(x, harlie) -> Account(harlie, olimpia))\nforall x (Transfix(x, olimpia) -> Transfix(olimpia, loralee))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Trammel(x, harlie) -> Transfix(harlie, loralee))\n\nTrammel(harlie, loralee)\n\nTrammel(harlie, loralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The marquita is catholic. The marquita is anaglyptic. The marquita is squamulose. The marquita course the rosemaria. The marquita sing the ryan. The marquita beak the ryan. The rosemaria is squamulose. The rosemaria sing the marquita. The rosemaria beak the ryan. The ryan is anaglyptic. The ryan is squamulose. The ryan sing the rosemaria. If someone sing the marquita then they like the marquita. If someone beak the marquita then the marquita is mimic. If someone course the marquita then the marquita beak the rosemaria. If someone is anaglyptic and they need the rosemaria then the rosemaria beak the marquita. If someone sing the marquita then the marquita sing the ryan. If someone is mimic and they like the rosemaria then the rosemaria sing the ryan. The rosemaria is not anaglyptic.", "logic": "\nCatholic(marquita)\nAnaglyptic(marquita)\nSquamulose(marquita)\nCourse(marquita, rosemaria)\nSing(marquita, ryan)\nBeak(marquita, ryan)\nSquamulose(rosemaria)\nSing(rosemaria, marquita)\nBeak(rosemaria, ryan)\nAnaglyptic(ryan)\nSquamulose(ryan)\nSing(ryan, rosemaria)\nforall x (Sing(x, marquita) -> Course(x, marquita))\nforall x (Beak(x, marquita) -> Mimic(marquita))\nforall x (Course(x, marquita) -> Beak(marquita, rosemaria))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) and Sing(x, rosemaria) -> Beak(rosemaria, marquita))\nforall x (Sing(x, marquita) -> Sing(marquita, ryan))\nforall x (Mimic(x) and Course(x, rosemaria) -> Sing(rosemaria, ryan))\n\nnot Anaglyptic(rosemaria)\n\nnot Anaglyptic(rosemaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The lesly is aeschylean. The lesly is unused. The lesly is bastioned. The lesly eventuate the elsinore. The lesly reason the baron. The lesly grain the baron. The elsinore is bastioned. The elsinore reason the lesly. The elsinore grain the baron. The baron is unused. The baron is bastioned. The baron reason the elsinore. If someone reason the lesly then they like the lesly. If someone grain the lesly then the lesly is epiphytic. If someone eventuate the lesly then the lesly grain the elsinore. If someone is unused and they need the elsinore then the elsinore grain the lesly. If someone reason the lesly then the lesly reason the baron. If someone is epiphytic and they like the elsinore then the elsinore reason the baron. The lesly grain the lesly.", "logic": "\nAeschylean(lesly)\nUnused(lesly)\nBastioned(lesly)\nEventuate(lesly, elsinore)\nReason(lesly, baron)\nGrain(lesly, baron)\nBastioned(elsinore)\nReason(elsinore, lesly)\nGrain(elsinore, baron)\nUnused(baron)\nBastioned(baron)\nReason(baron, elsinore)\nforall x (Reason(x, lesly) -> Eventuate(x, lesly))\nforall x (Grain(x, lesly) -> Epiphytic(lesly))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, lesly) -> Grain(lesly, elsinore))\nforall x (Unused(x) and Reason(x, elsinore) -> Grain(elsinore, lesly))\nforall x (Reason(x, lesly) -> Reason(lesly, baron))\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) and Eventuate(x, elsinore) -> Reason(elsinore, baron))\n\nGrain(lesly, lesly)\n\nGrain(lesly, lesly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The aylmer is berrylike. The aylmer is perfect. The aylmer is columned. The aylmer immingle the ulysses. The aylmer surveil the twyla. The aylmer compart the twyla. The ulysses is columned. The ulysses surveil the aylmer. The ulysses compart the twyla. The twyla is perfect. The twyla is columned. The twyla surveil the ulysses. If someone surveil the aylmer then they like the aylmer. If someone compart the aylmer then the aylmer is megascopic. If someone immingle the aylmer then the aylmer compart the ulysses. If someone is perfect and they need the ulysses then the ulysses compart the aylmer. If someone surveil the aylmer then the aylmer surveil the twyla. If someone is megascopic and they like the ulysses then the ulysses surveil the twyla. The ulysses does not like the ulysses.", "logic": "\nBerrylike(aylmer)\nPerfect(aylmer)\nColumned(aylmer)\nImmingle(aylmer, ulysses)\nSurveil(aylmer, twyla)\nCompart(aylmer, twyla)\nColumned(ulysses)\nSurveil(ulysses, aylmer)\nCompart(ulysses, twyla)\nPerfect(twyla)\nColumned(twyla)\nSurveil(twyla, ulysses)\nforall x (Surveil(x, aylmer) -> Immingle(x, aylmer))\nforall x (Compart(x, aylmer) -> Megascopic(aylmer))\nforall x (Immingle(x, aylmer) -> Compart(aylmer, ulysses))\nforall x (Perfect(x) and Surveil(x, ulysses) -> Compart(ulysses, aylmer))\nforall x (Surveil(x, aylmer) -> Surveil(aylmer, twyla))\nforall x (Megascopic(x) and Immingle(x, ulysses) -> Surveil(ulysses, twyla))\n\nnot Immingle(ulysses, ulysses)\n\nnot Immingle(ulysses, ulysses) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The guillema is motor. The guillema is woeful. The guillema is wearied. The guillema incinerate the phoebe. The guillema firm the chadd. The guillema overprice the chadd. The phoebe is wearied. The phoebe firm the guillema. The phoebe overprice the chadd. The chadd is woeful. The chadd is wearied. The chadd firm the phoebe. If someone firm the guillema then they like the guillema. If someone overprice the guillema then the guillema is sedentary. If someone incinerate the guillema then the guillema overprice the phoebe. If someone is woeful and they need the phoebe then the phoebe overprice the guillema. If someone firm the guillema then the guillema firm the chadd. If someone is sedentary and they like the phoebe then the phoebe firm the chadd. The phoebe is sedentary.", "logic": "\nMotor(guillema)\nWoeful(guillema)\nWearied(guillema)\nIncinerate(guillema, phoebe)\nFirm(guillema, chadd)\nOverprice(guillema, chadd)\nWearied(phoebe)\nFirm(phoebe, guillema)\nOverprice(phoebe, chadd)\nWoeful(chadd)\nWearied(chadd)\nFirm(chadd, phoebe)\nforall x (Firm(x, guillema) -> Incinerate(x, guillema))\nforall x (Overprice(x, guillema) -> Sedentary(guillema))\nforall x (Incinerate(x, guillema) -> Overprice(guillema, phoebe))\nforall x (Woeful(x) and Firm(x, phoebe) -> Overprice(phoebe, guillema))\nforall x (Firm(x, guillema) -> Firm(guillema, chadd))\nforall x (Sedentary(x) and Incinerate(x, phoebe) -> Firm(phoebe, chadd))\n\nSedentary(phoebe)\n\nSedentary(phoebe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The katerine maunder the gunvor. The gunvor fireproof the katerine. The austin unlax the katerine. If the gunvor is conducive and the gunvor unlax the austin then the gunvor is voteless. If someone unlax the austin and the austin unlax the katerine then the austin is voteless. If someone is phagocytic then they chase the katerine. If someone maunder the gunvor then they visit the austin. If someone fireproof the gunvor and they chase the austin then the austin fireproof the katerine. All voteless, chaldean people are listed. If someone maunder the austin and the austin unlax the katerine then they visit the gunvor. If someone is voteless then they visit the gunvor. The gunvor fireproof the katerine.", "logic": "\nMaunder(katerine, gunvor)\nFireproof(gunvor, katerine)\nUnlax(austin, katerine)\nConducive(gunvor) and Unlax(gunvor, austin) -> Voteless(gunvor)\nforall x (Unlax(x, austin) and Unlax(austin, katerine) -> Voteless(austin))\nforall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Fireproof(x, katerine))\nforall x (Maunder(x, gunvor) -> Unlax(x, austin))\nforall x (Fireproof(x, gunvor) and Fireproof(x, austin) -> Fireproof(austin, katerine))\nforall x (Voteless(x) and Chaldean(x) -> Listed(x))\nforall x (Maunder(x, austin) and Unlax(austin, katerine) -> Unlax(x, gunvor))\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Unlax(x, gunvor))\n\nFireproof(gunvor, katerine)\n\ntherefore Fireproof(gunvor, katerine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The ugo summate the elmore. The elmore brisk the ugo. The velvet pawn the ugo. If the elmore is numerous and the elmore pawn the velvet then the elmore is flameproof. If someone pawn the velvet and the velvet pawn the ugo then the velvet is flameproof. If someone is dietary then they chase the ugo. If someone summate the elmore then they visit the velvet. If someone brisk the elmore and they chase the velvet then the velvet brisk the ugo. All flameproof, cordiform people are stratified. If someone summate the velvet and the velvet pawn the ugo then they visit the elmore. If someone is flameproof then they visit the elmore. The velvet does not visit the ugo.", "logic": "\nSummate(ugo, elmore)\nBrisk(elmore, ugo)\nPawn(velvet, ugo)\nNumerous(elmore) and Pawn(elmore, velvet) -> Flameproof(elmore)\nforall x (Pawn(x, velvet) and Pawn(velvet, ugo) -> Flameproof(velvet))\nforall x (Dietary(x) -> Brisk(x, ugo))\nforall x (Summate(x, elmore) -> Pawn(x, velvet))\nforall x (Brisk(x, elmore) and Brisk(x, velvet) -> Brisk(velvet, ugo))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Cordiform(x) -> Stratified(x))\nforall x (Summate(x, velvet) and Pawn(velvet, ugo) -> Pawn(x, elmore))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) -> Pawn(x, elmore))\n\nnot Pawn(velvet, ugo)\n\ntherefore Pawn(velvet, ugo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The guthrey belong the hermione. The hermione bespeak the guthrey. The arlen repurchase the guthrey. If the hermione is precordial and the hermione repurchase the arlen then the hermione is shredded. If someone repurchase the arlen and the arlen repurchase the guthrey then the arlen is shredded. If someone is homelike then they chase the guthrey. If someone belong the hermione then they visit the arlen. If someone bespeak the hermione and they chase the arlen then the arlen bespeak the guthrey. All shredded, oily people are eery. If someone belong the arlen and the arlen repurchase the guthrey then they visit the hermione. If someone is shredded then they visit the hermione. The guthrey repurchase the arlen.", "logic": "\nBelong(guthrey, hermione)\nBespeak(hermione, guthrey)\nRepurchase(arlen, guthrey)\nPrecordial(hermione) and Repurchase(hermione, arlen) -> Shredded(hermione)\nforall x (Repurchase(x, arlen) and Repurchase(arlen, guthrey) -> Shredded(arlen))\nforall x (Homelike(x) -> Bespeak(x, guthrey))\nforall x (Belong(x, hermione) -> Repurchase(x, arlen))\nforall x (Bespeak(x, hermione) and Bespeak(x, arlen) -> Bespeak(arlen, guthrey))\nforall x (Shredded(x) and Oily(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Belong(x, arlen) and Repurchase(arlen, guthrey) -> Repurchase(x, hermione))\nforall x (Shredded(x) -> Repurchase(x, hermione))\n\nRepurchase(guthrey, arlen)\n\nBelong(guthrey, hermione) and forall x (Belong(x, hermione) -> Repurchase(x, arlen)) -> therefore Repurchase(guthrey, arlen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The thurston capitulate the chelsie. The chelsie hobble the thurston. The betty lade the thurston. If the chelsie is songful and the chelsie lade the betty then the chelsie is judicable. If someone lade the betty and the betty lade the thurston then the betty is judicable. If someone is succinct then they chase the thurston. If someone capitulate the chelsie then they visit the betty. If someone hobble the chelsie and they chase the betty then the betty hobble the thurston. All judicable, same people are obscure. If someone capitulate the betty and the betty lade the thurston then they visit the chelsie. If someone is judicable then they visit the chelsie. The thurston does not visit the betty.", "logic": "\nCapitulate(thurston, chelsie)\nHobble(chelsie, thurston)\nLade(betty, thurston)\nSongful(chelsie) and Lade(chelsie, betty) -> Judicable(chelsie)\nforall x (Lade(x, betty) and Lade(betty, thurston) -> Judicable(betty))\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Hobble(x, thurston))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, chelsie) -> Lade(x, betty))\nforall x (Hobble(x, chelsie) and Hobble(x, betty) -> Hobble(betty, thurston))\nforall x (Judicable(x) and Same(x) -> Obscure(x))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, betty) and Lade(betty, thurston) -> Lade(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Judicable(x) -> Lade(x, chelsie))\n\nnot Lade(thurston, betty)\n\nCapitulate(thurston, chelsie) and forall x (Capitulate(x, chelsie) -> Lade(x, betty)) -> therefore Lade(thurston, betty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The cathi dissent the kristine. The kristine reconvert the cathi. The sibilla blackmail the cathi. If the kristine is roaring and the kristine blackmail the sibilla then the kristine is scalelike. If someone blackmail the sibilla and the sibilla blackmail the cathi then the sibilla is scalelike. If someone is shaping then they chase the cathi. If someone dissent the kristine then they visit the sibilla. If someone reconvert the kristine and they chase the sibilla then the sibilla reconvert the cathi. All scalelike, dropping people are relaxant. If someone dissent the sibilla and the sibilla blackmail the cathi then they visit the kristine. If someone is scalelike then they visit the kristine. The sibilla is scalelike.", "logic": "\nDissent(cathi, kristine)\nReconvert(kristine, cathi)\nBlackmail(sibilla, cathi)\nRoaring(kristine) and Blackmail(kristine, sibilla) -> Scalelike(kristine)\nforall x (Blackmail(x, sibilla) and Blackmail(sibilla, cathi) -> Scalelike(sibilla))\nforall x (Shaping(x) -> Reconvert(x, cathi))\nforall x (Dissent(x, kristine) -> Blackmail(x, sibilla))\nforall x (Reconvert(x, kristine) and Reconvert(x, sibilla) -> Reconvert(sibilla, cathi))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) and Dropping(x) -> Relaxant(x))\nforall x (Dissent(x, sibilla) and Blackmail(sibilla, cathi) -> Blackmail(x, kristine))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Blackmail(x, kristine))\n\nScalelike(sibilla)\n\nDissent(cathi, kristine) and forall x (Dissent(x, kristine) -> Blackmail(x, sibilla)) -> therefore Blackmail(cathi, sibilla) Blackmail(cathi, sibilla) and Blackmail(sibilla, cathi) and forall x (Blackmail(x, sibilla) and Blackmail(sibilla, cathi) -> Scalelike(sibilla)) -> therefore Scalelike(sibilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The fleur befuddle the priscella. The priscella export the fleur. The lotty chaffer the fleur. If the priscella is ascending and the priscella chaffer the lotty then the priscella is mutinous. If someone chaffer the lotty and the lotty chaffer the fleur then the lotty is mutinous. If someone is cismontane then they chase the fleur. If someone befuddle the priscella then they visit the lotty. If someone export the priscella and they chase the lotty then the lotty export the fleur. All mutinous, unbecoming people are gymnastic. If someone befuddle the lotty and the lotty chaffer the fleur then they visit the priscella. If someone is mutinous then they visit the priscella. The lotty is not mutinous.", "logic": "\nBefuddle(fleur, priscella)\nExport(priscella, fleur)\nChaffer(lotty, fleur)\nAscending(priscella) and Chaffer(priscella, lotty) -> Mutinous(priscella)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, lotty) and Chaffer(lotty, fleur) -> Mutinous(lotty))\nforall x (Cismontane(x) -> Export(x, fleur))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, priscella) -> Chaffer(x, lotty))\nforall x (Export(x, priscella) and Export(x, lotty) -> Export(lotty, fleur))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Unbecoming(x) -> Gymnastic(x))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, lotty) and Chaffer(lotty, fleur) -> Chaffer(x, priscella))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) -> Chaffer(x, priscella))\n\nnot Mutinous(lotty)\n\nBefuddle(fleur, priscella) and forall x (Befuddle(x, priscella) -> Chaffer(x, lotty)) -> therefore Chaffer(fleur, lotty) Chaffer(fleur, lotty) and Chaffer(lotty, fleur) and forall x (Chaffer(x, lotty) and Chaffer(lotty, fleur) -> Mutinous(lotty)) -> therefore Mutinous(lotty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The jackelyn pall the rozella. The rozella overleap the jackelyn. The janel summons the jackelyn. If the rozella is scarce and the rozella summons the janel then the rozella is thickening. If someone summons the janel and the janel summons the jackelyn then the janel is thickening. If someone is spineless then they chase the jackelyn. If someone pall the rozella then they visit the janel. If someone overleap the rozella and they chase the janel then the janel overleap the jackelyn. All thickening, grecian people are larghetto. If someone pall the janel and the janel summons the jackelyn then they visit the rozella. If someone is thickening then they visit the rozella. The janel summons the rozella.", "logic": "\nPall(jackelyn, rozella)\nOverleap(rozella, jackelyn)\nSummons(janel, jackelyn)\nScarce(rozella) and Summons(rozella, janel) -> Thickening(rozella)\nforall x (Summons(x, janel) and Summons(janel, jackelyn) -> Thickening(janel))\nforall x (Spineless(x) -> Overleap(x, jackelyn))\nforall x (Pall(x, rozella) -> Summons(x, janel))\nforall x (Overleap(x, rozella) and Overleap(x, janel) -> Overleap(janel, jackelyn))\nforall x (Thickening(x) and Grecian(x) -> Larghetto(x))\nforall x (Pall(x, janel) and Summons(janel, jackelyn) -> Summons(x, rozella))\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Summons(x, rozella))\n\nSummons(janel, rozella)\n\nPall(jackelyn, rozella) and forall x (Pall(x, rozella) -> Summons(x, janel)) -> therefore Summons(jackelyn, janel) Summons(jackelyn, janel) and Summons(janel, jackelyn) and forall x (Summons(x, janel) and Summons(janel, jackelyn) -> Thickening(janel)) -> therefore Thickening(janel) Thickening(janel) and forall x (Thickening(x) -> Summons(x, rozella)) -> therefore Summons(janel, rozella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The joe classify the vivyan. The vivyan nullify the joe. The dean part the joe. If the vivyan is aeriferous and the vivyan part the dean then the vivyan is nonliteral. If someone part the dean and the dean part the joe then the dean is nonliteral. If someone is nutritious then they chase the joe. If someone classify the vivyan then they visit the dean. If someone nullify the vivyan and they chase the dean then the dean nullify the joe. All nonliteral, abient people are thermal. If someone classify the dean and the dean part the joe then they visit the vivyan. If someone is nonliteral then they visit the vivyan. The dean does not visit the vivyan.", "logic": "\nClassify(joe, vivyan)\nNullify(vivyan, joe)\nPart(dean, joe)\nAeriferous(vivyan) and Part(vivyan, dean) -> Nonliteral(vivyan)\nforall x (Part(x, dean) and Part(dean, joe) -> Nonliteral(dean))\nforall x (Nutritious(x) -> Nullify(x, joe))\nforall x (Classify(x, vivyan) -> Part(x, dean))\nforall x (Nullify(x, vivyan) and Nullify(x, dean) -> Nullify(dean, joe))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) and Abient(x) -> Thermal(x))\nforall x (Classify(x, dean) and Part(dean, joe) -> Part(x, vivyan))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Part(x, vivyan))\n\nnot Part(dean, vivyan)\n\nClassify(joe, vivyan) and forall x (Classify(x, vivyan) -> Part(x, dean)) -> therefore Part(joe, dean) Part(joe, dean) and Part(dean, joe) and forall x (Part(x, dean) and Part(dean, joe) -> Nonliteral(dean)) -> therefore Nonliteral(dean) Nonliteral(dean) and forall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Part(x, vivyan)) -> therefore Part(dean, vivyan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The nathalia brazen the allsun. The allsun surprise the nathalia. The brant welsh the nathalia. If the allsun is immune and the allsun welsh the brant then the allsun is senile. If someone welsh the brant and the brant welsh the nathalia then the brant is senile. If someone is unseamed then they chase the nathalia. If someone brazen the allsun then they visit the brant. If someone surprise the allsun and they chase the brant then the brant surprise the nathalia. All senile, boorish people are oncoming. If someone brazen the brant and the brant welsh the nathalia then they visit the allsun. If someone is senile then they visit the allsun. The brant is not oncoming.", "logic": "\nBrazen(nathalia, allsun)\nSurprise(allsun, nathalia)\nWelsh(brant, nathalia)\nImmune(allsun) and Welsh(allsun, brant) -> Senile(allsun)\nforall x (Welsh(x, brant) and Welsh(brant, nathalia) -> Senile(brant))\nforall x (Unseamed(x) -> Surprise(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Brazen(x, allsun) -> Welsh(x, brant))\nforall x (Surprise(x, allsun) and Surprise(x, brant) -> Surprise(brant, nathalia))\nforall x (Senile(x) and Boorish(x) -> Oncoming(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x, brant) and Welsh(brant, nathalia) -> Welsh(x, allsun))\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Welsh(x, allsun))\n\nnot Oncoming(brant)\n\nforall x (Senile(x) and Boorish(x) -> Oncoming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The sidonnie daze the yetta. The yetta perpetrate the sidonnie. The coriss degauss the sidonnie. If the yetta is avoidable and the yetta degauss the coriss then the yetta is betrothed. If someone degauss the coriss and the coriss degauss the sidonnie then the coriss is betrothed. If someone is tired then they chase the sidonnie. If someone daze the yetta then they visit the coriss. If someone perpetrate the yetta and they chase the coriss then the coriss perpetrate the sidonnie. All betrothed, sprigged people are roughened. If someone daze the coriss and the coriss degauss the sidonnie then they visit the yetta. If someone is betrothed then they visit the yetta. The sidonnie is roughened.", "logic": "\nDaze(sidonnie, yetta)\nPerpetrate(yetta, sidonnie)\nDegauss(coriss, sidonnie)\nAvoidable(yetta) and Degauss(yetta, coriss) -> Betrothed(yetta)\nforall x (Degauss(x, coriss) and Degauss(coriss, sidonnie) -> Betrothed(coriss))\nforall x (Tired(x) -> Perpetrate(x, sidonnie))\nforall x (Daze(x, yetta) -> Degauss(x, coriss))\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, yetta) and Perpetrate(x, coriss) -> Perpetrate(coriss, sidonnie))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Daze(x, coriss) and Degauss(coriss, sidonnie) -> Degauss(x, yetta))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Degauss(x, yetta))\n\nRoughened(sidonnie)\n\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Roughened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The kerri regard the bary. The bary pock the kerri. The dian holystone the kerri. If the bary is loamy and the bary holystone the dian then the bary is epistemic. If someone holystone the dian and the dian holystone the kerri then the dian is epistemic. If someone is medusoid then they chase the kerri. If someone regard the bary then they visit the dian. If someone pock the bary and they chase the dian then the dian pock the kerri. All epistemic, alary people are goofy. If someone regard the dian and the dian holystone the kerri then they visit the bary. If someone is epistemic then they visit the bary. The dian does not visit the dian.", "logic": "\nRegard(kerri, bary)\nPock(bary, kerri)\nHolystone(dian, kerri)\nLoamy(bary) and Holystone(bary, dian) -> Epistemic(bary)\nforall x (Holystone(x, dian) and Holystone(dian, kerri) -> Epistemic(dian))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) -> Pock(x, kerri))\nforall x (Regard(x, bary) -> Holystone(x, dian))\nforall x (Pock(x, bary) and Pock(x, dian) -> Pock(dian, kerri))\nforall x (Epistemic(x) and Alary(x) -> Goofy(x))\nforall x (Regard(x, dian) and Holystone(dian, kerri) -> Holystone(x, bary))\nforall x (Epistemic(x) -> Holystone(x, bary))\n\nnot Holystone(dian, dian)\n\nforall x (Regard(x, bary) -> Holystone(x, dian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The sari cube the storm. The storm vaporise the sari. The graehme escape the sari. If the storm is unhinged and the storm escape the graehme then the storm is sorbed. If someone escape the graehme and the graehme escape the sari then the graehme is sorbed. If someone is neuromotor then they chase the sari. If someone cube the storm then they visit the graehme. If someone vaporise the storm and they chase the graehme then the graehme vaporise the sari. All sorbed, incurable people are buzzing. If someone cube the graehme and the graehme escape the sari then they visit the storm. If someone is sorbed then they visit the storm. The storm is buzzing.", "logic": "\nCube(sari, storm)\nVaporise(storm, sari)\nEscape(graehme, sari)\nUnhinged(storm) and Escape(storm, graehme) -> Sorbed(storm)\nforall x (Escape(x, graehme) and Escape(graehme, sari) -> Sorbed(graehme))\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) -> Vaporise(x, sari))\nforall x (Cube(x, storm) -> Escape(x, graehme))\nforall x (Vaporise(x, storm) and Vaporise(x, graehme) -> Vaporise(graehme, sari))\nforall x (Sorbed(x) and Incurable(x) -> Buzzing(x))\nforall x (Cube(x, graehme) and Escape(graehme, sari) -> Escape(x, storm))\nforall x (Sorbed(x) -> Escape(x, storm))\n\nBuzzing(storm)\n\nforall x (Sorbed(x) and Incurable(x) -> Buzzing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The luanna tussle the karel. The karel spool the luanna. The cheslie decoct the luanna. If the karel is oblivious and the karel decoct the cheslie then the karel is heritable. If someone decoct the cheslie and the cheslie decoct the luanna then the cheslie is heritable. If someone is oiled then they chase the luanna. If someone tussle the karel then they visit the cheslie. If someone spool the karel and they chase the cheslie then the cheslie spool the luanna. All heritable, bungling people are dwindling. If someone tussle the cheslie and the cheslie decoct the luanna then they visit the karel. If someone is heritable then they visit the karel. The cheslie does not like the karel.", "logic": "\nTussle(luanna, karel)\nSpool(karel, luanna)\nDecoct(cheslie, luanna)\nOblivious(karel) and Decoct(karel, cheslie) -> Heritable(karel)\nforall x (Decoct(x, cheslie) and Decoct(cheslie, luanna) -> Heritable(cheslie))\nforall x (Oiled(x) -> Spool(x, luanna))\nforall x (Tussle(x, karel) -> Decoct(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Spool(x, karel) and Spool(x, cheslie) -> Spool(cheslie, luanna))\nforall x (Heritable(x) and Bungling(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Tussle(x, cheslie) and Decoct(cheslie, luanna) -> Decoct(x, karel))\nforall x (Heritable(x) -> Decoct(x, karel))\n\nnot Tussle(cheslie, karel)\n\nnot Tussle(cheslie, karel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The bertha rant the bucky. The bucky sieve the bertha. The wenona shackle the bertha. If the bucky is seared and the bucky shackle the wenona then the bucky is crenulated. If someone shackle the wenona and the wenona shackle the bertha then the wenona is crenulated. If someone is feckless then they chase the bertha. If someone rant the bucky then they visit the wenona. If someone sieve the bucky and they chase the wenona then the wenona sieve the bertha. All crenulated, pampering people are creedal. If someone rant the wenona and the wenona shackle the bertha then they visit the bucky. If someone is crenulated then they visit the bucky. The bucky sieve the bucky.", "logic": "\nRant(bertha, bucky)\nSieve(bucky, bertha)\nShackle(wenona, bertha)\nSeared(bucky) and Shackle(bucky, wenona) -> Crenulated(bucky)\nforall x (Shackle(x, wenona) and Shackle(wenona, bertha) -> Crenulated(wenona))\nforall x (Feckless(x) -> Sieve(x, bertha))\nforall x (Rant(x, bucky) -> Shackle(x, wenona))\nforall x (Sieve(x, bucky) and Sieve(x, wenona) -> Sieve(wenona, bertha))\nforall x (Crenulated(x) and Pampering(x) -> Creedal(x))\nforall x (Rant(x, wenona) and Shackle(wenona, bertha) -> Shackle(x, bucky))\nforall x (Crenulated(x) -> Shackle(x, bucky))\n\nSieve(bucky, bucky)\n\nSieve(bucky, bucky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The dulcy equate the dionis. The dionis diss the dulcy. The ariel syndicate the dulcy. If the dionis is unaffected and the dionis syndicate the ariel then the dionis is spousal. If someone syndicate the ariel and the ariel syndicate the dulcy then the ariel is spousal. If someone is wailing then they chase the dulcy. If someone equate the dionis then they visit the ariel. If someone diss the dionis and they chase the ariel then the ariel diss the dulcy. All spousal, hellenic people are cushiony. If someone equate the ariel and the ariel syndicate the dulcy then they visit the dionis. If someone is spousal then they visit the dionis. The ariel is not hellenic.", "logic": "\nEquate(dulcy, dionis)\nDiss(dionis, dulcy)\nSyndicate(ariel, dulcy)\nUnaffected(dionis) and Syndicate(dionis, ariel) -> Spousal(dionis)\nforall x (Syndicate(x, ariel) and Syndicate(ariel, dulcy) -> Spousal(ariel))\nforall x (Wailing(x) -> Diss(x, dulcy))\nforall x (Equate(x, dionis) -> Syndicate(x, ariel))\nforall x (Diss(x, dionis) and Diss(x, ariel) -> Diss(ariel, dulcy))\nforall x (Spousal(x) and Hellenic(x) -> Cushiony(x))\nforall x (Equate(x, ariel) and Syndicate(ariel, dulcy) -> Syndicate(x, dionis))\nforall x (Spousal(x) -> Syndicate(x, dionis))\n\nnot Hellenic(ariel)\n\nnot Hellenic(ariel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The devin outrival the fleur. The fleur stymy the devin. The carey mulct the devin. If the fleur is unmovable and the fleur mulct the carey then the fleur is beta. If someone mulct the carey and the carey mulct the devin then the carey is beta. If someone is favorable then they chase the devin. If someone outrival the fleur then they visit the carey. If someone stymy the fleur and they chase the carey then the carey stymy the devin. All beta, phalangeal people are greensick. If someone outrival the carey and the carey mulct the devin then they visit the fleur. If someone is beta then they visit the fleur. The fleur is unmovable.", "logic": "\nOutrival(devin, fleur)\nStymy(fleur, devin)\nMulct(carey, devin)\nUnmovable(fleur) and Mulct(fleur, carey) -> Beta(fleur)\nforall x (Mulct(x, carey) and Mulct(carey, devin) -> Beta(carey))\nforall x (Favorable(x) -> Stymy(x, devin))\nforall x (Outrival(x, fleur) -> Mulct(x, carey))\nforall x (Stymy(x, fleur) and Stymy(x, carey) -> Stymy(carey, devin))\nforall x (Beta(x) and Phalangeal(x) -> Greensick(x))\nforall x (Outrival(x, carey) and Mulct(carey, devin) -> Mulct(x, fleur))\nforall x (Beta(x) -> Mulct(x, fleur))\n\nUnmovable(fleur)\n\nUnmovable(fleur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The consolata is twinkling. The consolata convalesce the elsey. The consolata accede the arlo. The rozanne convalesce the consolata. The rozanne rest the consolata. The rozanne rest the elsey. The elsey convalesce the consolata. The elsey rest the arlo. The elsey accede the consolata. The arlo is clitoral. The arlo convalesce the elsey. The arlo accede the consolata. All twinkling things are backed. If something rest the elsey then it is twinkling. If something convalesce the arlo then the arlo is smelly. If something accede the arlo then it is backed. If something rest the consolata and it rest the arlo then it accede the elsey. If something is backed then it convalesce the rozanne. The rozanne convalesce the consolata.", "logic": "\nTwinkling(consolata)\nConvalesce(consolata, elsey)\nAccede(consolata, arlo)\nConvalesce(rozanne, consolata)\nRest(rozanne, consolata)\nRest(rozanne, elsey)\nConvalesce(elsey, consolata)\nRest(elsey, arlo)\nAccede(elsey, consolata)\nClitoral(arlo)\nConvalesce(arlo, elsey)\nAccede(arlo, consolata)\nforall x (Twinkling(x) -> Backed(x))\nforall x (Rest(x, elsey) -> Twinkling(x))\nforall x (Convalesce(x, arlo) -> Smelly(arlo))\nforall x (Accede(x, arlo) -> Backed(x))\nforall x (Rest(x, consolata) and Rest(x, arlo) -> Accede(x, elsey))\nforall x (Backed(x) -> Convalesce(x, rozanne))\n\nConvalesce(rozanne, consolata)\n\ntherefore Convalesce(rozanne, consolata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The robinson is afloat. The robinson itemise the jada. The robinson italicise the nicolina. The karola itemise the robinson. The karola blandish the robinson. The karola blandish the jada. The jada itemise the robinson. The jada blandish the nicolina. The jada italicise the robinson. The nicolina is peevish. The nicolina itemise the jada. The nicolina italicise the robinson. All afloat things are muted. If something blandish the jada then it is afloat. If something itemise the nicolina then the nicolina is chilean. If something italicise the nicolina then it is muted. If something blandish the robinson and it blandish the nicolina then it italicise the jada. If something is muted then it itemise the karola. The nicolina does not like the jada.", "logic": "\nAfloat(robinson)\nItemise(robinson, jada)\nItalicise(robinson, nicolina)\nItemise(karola, robinson)\nBlandish(karola, robinson)\nBlandish(karola, jada)\nItemise(jada, robinson)\nBlandish(jada, nicolina)\nItalicise(jada, robinson)\nPeevish(nicolina)\nItemise(nicolina, jada)\nItalicise(nicolina, robinson)\nforall x (Afloat(x) -> Muted(x))\nforall x (Blandish(x, jada) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Itemise(x, nicolina) -> Chilean(nicolina))\nforall x (Italicise(x, nicolina) -> Muted(x))\nforall x (Blandish(x, robinson) and Blandish(x, nicolina) -> Italicise(x, jada))\nforall x (Muted(x) -> Itemise(x, karola))\n\nnot Itemise(nicolina, jada)\n\ntherefore Itemise(nicolina, jada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The penny is demode. The penny append the pris. The penny ogle the berte. The lucia append the penny. The lucia auspicate the penny. The lucia auspicate the pris. The pris append the penny. The pris auspicate the berte. The pris ogle the penny. The berte is spinose. The berte append the pris. The berte ogle the penny. All demode things are ammoniac. If something auspicate the pris then it is demode. If something append the berte then the berte is painless. If something ogle the berte then it is ammoniac. If something auspicate the penny and it auspicate the berte then it ogle the pris. If something is ammoniac then it append the lucia. The lucia is demode.", "logic": "\nDemode(penny)\nAppend(penny, pris)\nOgle(penny, berte)\nAppend(lucia, penny)\nAuspicate(lucia, penny)\nAuspicate(lucia, pris)\nAppend(pris, penny)\nAuspicate(pris, berte)\nOgle(pris, penny)\nSpinose(berte)\nAppend(berte, pris)\nOgle(berte, penny)\nforall x (Demode(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Auspicate(x, pris) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Append(x, berte) -> Painless(berte))\nforall x (Ogle(x, berte) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Auspicate(x, penny) and Auspicate(x, berte) -> Ogle(x, pris))\nforall x (Ammoniac(x) -> Append(x, lucia))\n\nDemode(lucia)\n\nAuspicate(lucia, pris) and forall x (Auspicate(x, pris) -> Demode(x)) -> therefore Demode(lucia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The barth is bandy. The barth wander the oswell. The barth controvert the kristos. The zach wander the barth. The zach comminate the barth. The zach comminate the oswell. The oswell wander the barth. The oswell comminate the kristos. The oswell controvert the barth. The kristos is cockamamie. The kristos wander the oswell. The kristos controvert the barth. All bandy things are liii. If something comminate the oswell then it is bandy. If something wander the kristos then the kristos is filmy. If something controvert the kristos then it is liii. If something comminate the barth and it comminate the kristos then it controvert the oswell. If something is liii then it wander the zach. The zach is not bandy.", "logic": "\nBandy(barth)\nWander(barth, oswell)\nControvert(barth, kristos)\nWander(zach, barth)\nComminate(zach, barth)\nComminate(zach, oswell)\nWander(oswell, barth)\nComminate(oswell, kristos)\nControvert(oswell, barth)\nCockamamie(kristos)\nWander(kristos, oswell)\nControvert(kristos, barth)\nforall x (Bandy(x) -> Liii(x))\nforall x (Comminate(x, oswell) -> Bandy(x))\nforall x (Wander(x, kristos) -> Filmy(kristos))\nforall x (Controvert(x, kristos) -> Liii(x))\nforall x (Comminate(x, barth) and Comminate(x, kristos) -> Controvert(x, oswell))\nforall x (Liii(x) -> Wander(x, zach))\n\nnot Bandy(zach)\n\nComminate(zach, oswell) and forall x (Comminate(x, oswell) -> Bandy(x)) -> therefore Bandy(zach)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The jacenta is choleraic. The jacenta tread the clare. The jacenta bald the trip. The morissa tread the jacenta. The morissa chisel the jacenta. The morissa chisel the clare. The clare tread the jacenta. The clare chisel the trip. The clare bald the jacenta. The trip is criminal. The trip tread the clare. The trip bald the jacenta. All choleraic things are greyish. If something chisel the clare then it is choleraic. If something tread the trip then the trip is plutonic. If something bald the trip then it is greyish. If something chisel the jacenta and it chisel the trip then it bald the clare. If something is greyish then it tread the morissa. The jacenta tread the morissa.", "logic": "\nCholeraic(jacenta)\nTread(jacenta, clare)\nBald(jacenta, trip)\nTread(morissa, jacenta)\nChisel(morissa, jacenta)\nChisel(morissa, clare)\nTread(clare, jacenta)\nChisel(clare, trip)\nBald(clare, jacenta)\nCriminal(trip)\nTread(trip, clare)\nBald(trip, jacenta)\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Chisel(x, clare) -> Choleraic(x))\nforall x (Tread(x, trip) -> Plutonic(trip))\nforall x (Bald(x, trip) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Chisel(x, jacenta) and Chisel(x, trip) -> Bald(x, clare))\nforall x (Greyish(x) -> Tread(x, morissa))\n\nTread(jacenta, morissa)\n\nCholeraic(jacenta) and forall x (Choleraic(x) -> Greyish(x)) -> therefore Greyish(jacenta) Greyish(jacenta) and forall x (Greyish(x) -> Tread(x, morissa)) -> therefore Tread(jacenta, morissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The clarice is abstract. The clarice capsulise the rosemarie. The clarice page the elvira. The vinni capsulise the clarice. The vinni spice the clarice. The vinni spice the rosemarie. The rosemarie capsulise the clarice. The rosemarie spice the elvira. The rosemarie page the clarice. The elvira is deserved. The elvira capsulise the rosemarie. The elvira page the clarice. All abstract things are ambrosian. If something spice the rosemarie then it is abstract. If something capsulise the elvira then the elvira is deciduous. If something page the elvira then it is ambrosian. If something spice the clarice and it spice the elvira then it page the rosemarie. If something is ambrosian then it capsulise the vinni. The vinni is not ambrosian.", "logic": "\nAbstract(clarice)\nCapsulise(clarice, rosemarie)\nPage(clarice, elvira)\nCapsulise(vinni, clarice)\nSpice(vinni, clarice)\nSpice(vinni, rosemarie)\nCapsulise(rosemarie, clarice)\nSpice(rosemarie, elvira)\nPage(rosemarie, clarice)\nDeserved(elvira)\nCapsulise(elvira, rosemarie)\nPage(elvira, clarice)\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Spice(x, rosemarie) -> Abstract(x))\nforall x (Capsulise(x, elvira) -> Deciduous(elvira))\nforall x (Page(x, elvira) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Spice(x, clarice) and Spice(x, elvira) -> Page(x, rosemarie))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Capsulise(x, vinni))\n\nnot Ambrosian(vinni)\n\nSpice(vinni, rosemarie) and forall x (Spice(x, rosemarie) -> Abstract(x)) -> therefore Abstract(vinni) Abstract(vinni) and forall x (Abstract(x) -> Ambrosian(x)) -> therefore Ambrosian(vinni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The wallas is embodied. The wallas reeve the phedra. The wallas flocculate the malka. The pinchas reeve the wallas. The pinchas precess the wallas. The pinchas precess the phedra. The phedra reeve the wallas. The phedra precess the malka. The phedra flocculate the wallas. The malka is prospering. The malka reeve the phedra. The malka flocculate the wallas. All embodied things are peckish. If something precess the phedra then it is embodied. If something reeve the malka then the malka is unfixed. If something flocculate the malka then it is peckish. If something precess the wallas and it precess the malka then it flocculate the phedra. If something is peckish then it reeve the pinchas. The pinchas reeve the pinchas.", "logic": "\nEmbodied(wallas)\nReeve(wallas, phedra)\nFlocculate(wallas, malka)\nReeve(pinchas, wallas)\nPrecess(pinchas, wallas)\nPrecess(pinchas, phedra)\nReeve(phedra, wallas)\nPrecess(phedra, malka)\nFlocculate(phedra, wallas)\nProspering(malka)\nReeve(malka, phedra)\nFlocculate(malka, wallas)\nforall x (Embodied(x) -> Peckish(x))\nforall x (Precess(x, phedra) -> Embodied(x))\nforall x (Reeve(x, malka) -> Unfixed(malka))\nforall x (Flocculate(x, malka) -> Peckish(x))\nforall x (Precess(x, wallas) and Precess(x, malka) -> Flocculate(x, phedra))\nforall x (Peckish(x) -> Reeve(x, pinchas))\n\nReeve(pinchas, pinchas)\n\nPrecess(pinchas, phedra) and forall x (Precess(x, phedra) -> Embodied(x)) -> therefore Embodied(pinchas) Embodied(pinchas) and forall x (Embodied(x) -> Peckish(x)) -> therefore Peckish(pinchas) Peckish(pinchas) and forall x (Peckish(x) -> Reeve(x, pinchas)) -> therefore Reeve(pinchas, pinchas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The sallyanne is contextual. The sallyanne stickle the caty. The sallyanne rise the adlai. The stern stickle the sallyanne. The stern split the sallyanne. The stern split the caty. The caty stickle the sallyanne. The caty split the adlai. The caty rise the sallyanne. The adlai is ignorant. The adlai stickle the caty. The adlai rise the sallyanne. All contextual things are lumpish. If something split the caty then it is contextual. If something stickle the adlai then the adlai is primo. If something rise the adlai then it is lumpish. If something split the sallyanne and it split the adlai then it rise the caty. If something is lumpish then it stickle the stern. The stern does not like the stern.", "logic": "\nContextual(sallyanne)\nStickle(sallyanne, caty)\nRise(sallyanne, adlai)\nStickle(stern, sallyanne)\nSplit(stern, sallyanne)\nSplit(stern, caty)\nStickle(caty, sallyanne)\nSplit(caty, adlai)\nRise(caty, sallyanne)\nIgnorant(adlai)\nStickle(adlai, caty)\nRise(adlai, sallyanne)\nforall x (Contextual(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Split(x, caty) -> Contextual(x))\nforall x (Stickle(x, adlai) -> Primo(adlai))\nforall x (Rise(x, adlai) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Split(x, sallyanne) and Split(x, adlai) -> Rise(x, caty))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Stickle(x, stern))\n\nnot Stickle(stern, stern)\n\nSplit(stern, caty) and forall x (Split(x, caty) -> Contextual(x)) -> therefore Contextual(stern) Contextual(stern) and forall x (Contextual(x) -> Lumpish(x)) -> therefore Lumpish(stern) Lumpish(stern) and forall x (Lumpish(x) -> Stickle(x, stern)) -> therefore Stickle(stern, stern)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The ninnette is sooty. The ninnette osculate the coleen. The ninnette posture the hew. The berkley osculate the ninnette. The berkley credit the ninnette. The berkley credit the coleen. The coleen osculate the ninnette. The coleen credit the hew. The coleen posture the ninnette. The hew is impartial. The hew osculate the coleen. The hew posture the ninnette. All sooty things are aflare. If something credit the coleen then it is sooty. If something osculate the hew then the hew is ennobling. If something posture the hew then it is aflare. If something credit the ninnette and it credit the hew then it posture the coleen. If something is aflare then it osculate the berkley. The coleen is not sooty.", "logic": "\nSooty(ninnette)\nOsculate(ninnette, coleen)\nPosture(ninnette, hew)\nOsculate(berkley, ninnette)\nCredit(berkley, ninnette)\nCredit(berkley, coleen)\nOsculate(coleen, ninnette)\nCredit(coleen, hew)\nPosture(coleen, ninnette)\nImpartial(hew)\nOsculate(hew, coleen)\nPosture(hew, ninnette)\nforall x (Sooty(x) -> Aflare(x))\nforall x (Credit(x, coleen) -> Sooty(x))\nforall x (Osculate(x, hew) -> Ennobling(hew))\nforall x (Posture(x, hew) -> Aflare(x))\nforall x (Credit(x, ninnette) and Credit(x, hew) -> Posture(x, coleen))\nforall x (Aflare(x) -> Osculate(x, berkley))\n\nnot Sooty(coleen)\n\nforall x (Credit(x, coleen) -> Sooty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The joyce is plutonian. The joyce quantize the manda. The joyce unroll the silvain. The lonee quantize the joyce. The lonee jubilate the joyce. The lonee jubilate the manda. The manda quantize the joyce. The manda jubilate the silvain. The manda unroll the joyce. The silvain is spiderlike. The silvain quantize the manda. The silvain unroll the joyce. All plutonian things are figured. If something jubilate the manda then it is plutonian. If something quantize the silvain then the silvain is imposing. If something unroll the silvain then it is figured. If something jubilate the joyce and it jubilate the silvain then it unroll the manda. If something is figured then it quantize the lonee. The silvain unroll the manda.", "logic": "\nPlutonian(joyce)\nQuantize(joyce, manda)\nUnroll(joyce, silvain)\nQuantize(lonee, joyce)\nJubilate(lonee, joyce)\nJubilate(lonee, manda)\nQuantize(manda, joyce)\nJubilate(manda, silvain)\nUnroll(manda, joyce)\nSpiderlike(silvain)\nQuantize(silvain, manda)\nUnroll(silvain, joyce)\nforall x (Plutonian(x) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, manda) -> Plutonian(x))\nforall x (Quantize(x, silvain) -> Imposing(silvain))\nforall x (Unroll(x, silvain) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, joyce) and Jubilate(x, silvain) -> Unroll(x, manda))\nforall x (Figured(x) -> Quantize(x, lonee))\n\nUnroll(silvain, manda)\n\nforall x (Jubilate(x, joyce) and Jubilate(x, silvain) -> Unroll(x, manda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The michelle is sensitive. The michelle bush the quintin. The michelle churr the eddy. The adriana bush the michelle. The adriana pearl the michelle. The adriana pearl the quintin. The quintin bush the michelle. The quintin pearl the eddy. The quintin churr the michelle. The eddy is eleventh. The eddy bush the quintin. The eddy churr the michelle. All sensitive things are semilunar. If something pearl the quintin then it is sensitive. If something bush the eddy then the eddy is sere. If something churr the eddy then it is semilunar. If something pearl the michelle and it pearl the eddy then it churr the quintin. If something is semilunar then it bush the adriana. The quintin does not visit the quintin.", "logic": "\nSensitive(michelle)\nBush(michelle, quintin)\nChurr(michelle, eddy)\nBush(adriana, michelle)\nPearl(adriana, michelle)\nPearl(adriana, quintin)\nBush(quintin, michelle)\nPearl(quintin, eddy)\nChurr(quintin, michelle)\nEleventh(eddy)\nBush(eddy, quintin)\nChurr(eddy, michelle)\nforall x (Sensitive(x) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Pearl(x, quintin) -> Sensitive(x))\nforall x (Bush(x, eddy) -> Sere(eddy))\nforall x (Churr(x, eddy) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Pearl(x, michelle) and Pearl(x, eddy) -> Churr(x, quintin))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Bush(x, adriana))\n\nnot Churr(quintin, quintin)\n\nforall x (Pearl(x, michelle) and Pearl(x, eddy) -> Churr(x, quintin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The clemmie is monkish. The clemmie film the reinhold. The clemmie uniformise the valaree. The rosanna film the clemmie. The rosanna symbolise the clemmie. The rosanna symbolise the reinhold. The reinhold film the clemmie. The reinhold symbolise the valaree. The reinhold uniformise the clemmie. The valaree is semantic. The valaree film the reinhold. The valaree uniformise the clemmie. All monkish things are fleeceable. If something symbolise the reinhold then it is monkish. If something film the valaree then the valaree is saddled. If something uniformise the valaree then it is fleeceable. If something symbolise the clemmie and it symbolise the valaree then it uniformise the reinhold. If something is fleeceable then it film the rosanna. The valaree is monkish.", "logic": "\nMonkish(clemmie)\nFilm(clemmie, reinhold)\nUniformise(clemmie, valaree)\nFilm(rosanna, clemmie)\nSymbolise(rosanna, clemmie)\nSymbolise(rosanna, reinhold)\nFilm(reinhold, clemmie)\nSymbolise(reinhold, valaree)\nUniformise(reinhold, clemmie)\nSemantic(valaree)\nFilm(valaree, reinhold)\nUniformise(valaree, clemmie)\nforall x (Monkish(x) -> Fleeceable(x))\nforall x (Symbolise(x, reinhold) -> Monkish(x))\nforall x (Film(x, valaree) -> Saddled(valaree))\nforall x (Uniformise(x, valaree) -> Fleeceable(x))\nforall x (Symbolise(x, clemmie) and Symbolise(x, valaree) -> Uniformise(x, reinhold))\nforall x (Fleeceable(x) -> Film(x, rosanna))\n\nMonkish(valaree)\n\nforall x (Symbolise(x, reinhold) -> Monkish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The katerina is lanky. The katerina unfurl the fairfax. The katerina buckle the annalyse. The cornelius unfurl the katerina. The cornelius bellow the katerina. The cornelius bellow the fairfax. The fairfax unfurl the katerina. The fairfax bellow the annalyse. The fairfax buckle the katerina. The annalyse is syllabic. The annalyse unfurl the fairfax. The annalyse buckle the katerina. All lanky things are tentative. If something bellow the fairfax then it is lanky. If something unfurl the annalyse then the annalyse is epicarpal. If something buckle the annalyse then it is tentative. If something bellow the katerina and it bellow the annalyse then it buckle the fairfax. If something is tentative then it unfurl the cornelius. The katerina does not see the katerina.", "logic": "\nLanky(katerina)\nUnfurl(katerina, fairfax)\nBuckle(katerina, annalyse)\nUnfurl(cornelius, katerina)\nBellow(cornelius, katerina)\nBellow(cornelius, fairfax)\nUnfurl(fairfax, katerina)\nBellow(fairfax, annalyse)\nBuckle(fairfax, katerina)\nSyllabic(annalyse)\nUnfurl(annalyse, fairfax)\nBuckle(annalyse, katerina)\nforall x (Lanky(x) -> Tentative(x))\nforall x (Bellow(x, fairfax) -> Lanky(x))\nforall x (Unfurl(x, annalyse) -> Epicarpal(annalyse))\nforall x (Buckle(x, annalyse) -> Tentative(x))\nforall x (Bellow(x, katerina) and Bellow(x, annalyse) -> Buckle(x, fairfax))\nforall x (Tentative(x) -> Unfurl(x, cornelius))\n\nnot Bellow(katerina, katerina)\n\nnot Bellow(katerina, katerina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The sybila is deflective. The sybila ship the whitney. The sybila complain the mayor. The lilllie ship the sybila. The lilllie mute the sybila. The lilllie mute the whitney. The whitney ship the sybila. The whitney mute the mayor. The whitney complain the sybila. The mayor is dropsical. The mayor ship the whitney. The mayor complain the sybila. All deflective things are wrathful. If something mute the whitney then it is deflective. If something ship the mayor then the mayor is biped. If something complain the mayor then it is wrathful. If something mute the sybila and it mute the mayor then it complain the whitney. If something is wrathful then it ship the lilllie. The mayor mute the lilllie.", "logic": "\nDeflective(sybila)\nShip(sybila, whitney)\nComplain(sybila, mayor)\nShip(lilllie, sybila)\nMute(lilllie, sybila)\nMute(lilllie, whitney)\nShip(whitney, sybila)\nMute(whitney, mayor)\nComplain(whitney, sybila)\nDropsical(mayor)\nShip(mayor, whitney)\nComplain(mayor, sybila)\nforall x (Deflective(x) -> Wrathful(x))\nforall x (Mute(x, whitney) -> Deflective(x))\nforall x (Ship(x, mayor) -> Biped(mayor))\nforall x (Complain(x, mayor) -> Wrathful(x))\nforall x (Mute(x, sybila) and Mute(x, mayor) -> Complain(x, whitney))\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> Ship(x, lilllie))\n\nMute(mayor, lilllie)\n\nMute(mayor, lilllie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The dunstan is enumerable. The dunstan fuel the robinette. The dunstan overgrow the christyna. The gerhardt fuel the dunstan. The gerhardt chasten the dunstan. The gerhardt chasten the robinette. The robinette fuel the dunstan. The robinette chasten the christyna. The robinette overgrow the dunstan. The christyna is gleaming. The christyna fuel the robinette. The christyna overgrow the dunstan. All enumerable things are ignited. If something chasten the robinette then it is enumerable. If something fuel the christyna then the christyna is anisogamic. If something overgrow the christyna then it is ignited. If something chasten the dunstan and it chasten the christyna then it overgrow the robinette. If something is ignited then it fuel the gerhardt. The dunstan does not like the christyna.", "logic": "\nEnumerable(dunstan)\nFuel(dunstan, robinette)\nOvergrow(dunstan, christyna)\nFuel(gerhardt, dunstan)\nChasten(gerhardt, dunstan)\nChasten(gerhardt, robinette)\nFuel(robinette, dunstan)\nChasten(robinette, christyna)\nOvergrow(robinette, dunstan)\nGleaming(christyna)\nFuel(christyna, robinette)\nOvergrow(christyna, dunstan)\nforall x (Enumerable(x) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Chasten(x, robinette) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Fuel(x, christyna) -> Anisogamic(christyna))\nforall x (Overgrow(x, christyna) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Chasten(x, dunstan) and Chasten(x, christyna) -> Overgrow(x, robinette))\nforall x (Ignited(x) -> Fuel(x, gerhardt))\n\nnot Fuel(dunstan, christyna)\n\nnot Fuel(dunstan, christyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The jessi is fungible. The jessi ionize the rasla. The jessi profile the katharina. The florette ionize the jessi. The florette delight the jessi. The florette delight the rasla. The rasla ionize the jessi. The rasla delight the katharina. The rasla profile the jessi. The katharina is kingly. The katharina ionize the rasla. The katharina profile the jessi. All fungible things are fibrous. If something delight the rasla then it is fungible. If something ionize the katharina then the katharina is apomictic. If something profile the katharina then it is fibrous. If something delight the jessi and it delight the katharina then it profile the rasla. If something is fibrous then it ionize the florette. The katharina ionize the katharina.", "logic": "\nFungible(jessi)\nIonize(jessi, rasla)\nProfile(jessi, katharina)\nIonize(florette, jessi)\nDelight(florette, jessi)\nDelight(florette, rasla)\nIonize(rasla, jessi)\nDelight(rasla, katharina)\nProfile(rasla, jessi)\nKingly(katharina)\nIonize(katharina, rasla)\nProfile(katharina, jessi)\nforall x (Fungible(x) -> Fibrous(x))\nforall x (Delight(x, rasla) -> Fungible(x))\nforall x (Ionize(x, katharina) -> Apomictic(katharina))\nforall x (Profile(x, katharina) -> Fibrous(x))\nforall x (Delight(x, jessi) and Delight(x, katharina) -> Profile(x, rasla))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) -> Ionize(x, florette))\n\nIonize(katharina, katharina)\n\nIonize(katharina, katharina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The julianne is colonial. The julianne malign the edwin. The elvis berry the edwin. The elvis is colonial. The elvis malign the julianne. The edwin malign the julianne. The jerry is abroad. If someone malign the jerry and the jerry monitor the edwin then they need the julianne. If someone malign the elvis then the elvis is abroad. If the julianne does not visit the edwin then the edwin is chantlike. If someone malign the edwin and the edwin does not chase the jerry then the edwin berry the julianne. If someone is abroad then they visit the elvis. If someone berry the edwin and they visit the edwin then they are chantlike. The edwin malign the julianne.", "logic": "\nColonial(julianne)\nMalign(julianne, edwin)\nBerry(elvis, edwin)\nColonial(elvis)\nMalign(elvis, julianne)\nMalign(edwin, julianne)\nAbroad(jerry)\nforall x (Malign(x, jerry) and Monitor(jerry, edwin) -> Monitor(x, julianne))\nforall x (Malign(x, elvis) -> Abroad(elvis))\nnot Malign(julianne, edwin) -> Chantlike(edwin)\nforall x (Malign(x, edwin) and not Berry(edwin, jerry) -> Berry(edwin, julianne))\nforall x (Abroad(x) -> Malign(x, elvis))\nforall x (Berry(x, edwin) and Malign(x, edwin) -> Chantlike(x))\n\nMalign(edwin, julianne)\n\ntherefore Malign(edwin, julianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The mortie is papist. The mortie tread the easton. The engelbart condense the easton. The engelbart is papist. The engelbart tread the mortie. The easton tread the mortie. The ludvig is threadbare. If someone tread the ludvig and the ludvig reassemble the easton then they need the mortie. If someone tread the engelbart then the engelbart is threadbare. If the mortie does not visit the easton then the easton is stern. If someone tread the easton and the easton does not chase the ludvig then the easton condense the mortie. If someone is threadbare then they visit the engelbart. If someone condense the easton and they visit the easton then they are stern. The ludvig is not threadbare.", "logic": "\nPapist(mortie)\nTread(mortie, easton)\nCondense(engelbart, easton)\nPapist(engelbart)\nTread(engelbart, mortie)\nTread(easton, mortie)\nThreadbare(ludvig)\nforall x (Tread(x, ludvig) and Reassemble(ludvig, easton) -> Reassemble(x, mortie))\nforall x (Tread(x, engelbart) -> Threadbare(engelbart))\nnot Tread(mortie, easton) -> Stern(easton)\nforall x (Tread(x, easton) and not Condense(easton, ludvig) -> Condense(easton, mortie))\nforall x (Threadbare(x) -> Tread(x, engelbart))\nforall x (Condense(x, easton) and Tread(x, easton) -> Stern(x))\n\nnot Threadbare(ludvig)\n\ntherefore Threadbare(ludvig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The aram is repeatable. The aram vaporize the thelma. The elaine tarmac the thelma. The elaine is repeatable. The elaine vaporize the aram. The thelma vaporize the aram. The corrina is echoing. If someone vaporize the corrina and the corrina peroxide the thelma then they need the aram. If someone vaporize the elaine then the elaine is echoing. If the aram does not visit the thelma then the thelma is eremitical. If someone vaporize the thelma and the thelma does not chase the corrina then the thelma tarmac the aram. If someone is echoing then they visit the elaine. If someone tarmac the thelma and they visit the thelma then they are eremitical. The corrina vaporize the elaine.", "logic": "\nRepeatable(aram)\nVaporize(aram, thelma)\nTarmac(elaine, thelma)\nRepeatable(elaine)\nVaporize(elaine, aram)\nVaporize(thelma, aram)\nEchoing(corrina)\nforall x (Vaporize(x, corrina) and Peroxide(corrina, thelma) -> Peroxide(x, aram))\nforall x (Vaporize(x, elaine) -> Echoing(elaine))\nnot Vaporize(aram, thelma) -> Eremitical(thelma)\nforall x (Vaporize(x, thelma) and not Tarmac(thelma, corrina) -> Tarmac(thelma, aram))\nforall x (Echoing(x) -> Vaporize(x, elaine))\nforall x (Tarmac(x, thelma) and Vaporize(x, thelma) -> Eremitical(x))\n\nVaporize(corrina, elaine)\n\nEchoing(corrina) and forall x (Echoing(x) -> Vaporize(x, elaine)) -> therefore Vaporize(corrina, elaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The hortense is radiating. The hortense whale the judie. The gwenneth dimple the judie. The gwenneth is radiating. The gwenneth whale the hortense. The judie whale the hortense. The marni is personable. If someone whale the marni and the marni currycomb the judie then they need the hortense. If someone whale the gwenneth then the gwenneth is personable. If the hortense does not visit the judie then the judie is dumpy. If someone whale the judie and the judie does not chase the marni then the judie dimple the hortense. If someone is personable then they visit the gwenneth. If someone dimple the judie and they visit the judie then they are dumpy. The marni does not visit the gwenneth.", "logic": "\nRadiating(hortense)\nWhale(hortense, judie)\nDimple(gwenneth, judie)\nRadiating(gwenneth)\nWhale(gwenneth, hortense)\nWhale(judie, hortense)\nPersonable(marni)\nforall x (Whale(x, marni) and Currycomb(marni, judie) -> Currycomb(x, hortense))\nforall x (Whale(x, gwenneth) -> Personable(gwenneth))\nnot Whale(hortense, judie) -> Dumpy(judie)\nforall x (Whale(x, judie) and not Dimple(judie, marni) -> Dimple(judie, hortense))\nforall x (Personable(x) -> Whale(x, gwenneth))\nforall x (Dimple(x, judie) and Whale(x, judie) -> Dumpy(x))\n\nnot Whale(marni, gwenneth)\n\nPersonable(marni) and forall x (Personable(x) -> Whale(x, gwenneth)) -> therefore Whale(marni, gwenneth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The almira is convulsive. The almira emblazon the colly. The maritsa consent the colly. The maritsa is convulsive. The maritsa emblazon the almira. The colly emblazon the almira. The merrel is collarless. If someone emblazon the merrel and the merrel rape the colly then they need the almira. If someone emblazon the maritsa then the maritsa is collarless. If the almira does not visit the colly then the colly is yogic. If someone emblazon the colly and the colly does not chase the merrel then the colly consent the almira. If someone is collarless then they visit the maritsa. If someone consent the colly and they visit the colly then they are yogic. The maritsa is collarless.", "logic": "\nConvulsive(almira)\nEmblazon(almira, colly)\nConsent(maritsa, colly)\nConvulsive(maritsa)\nEmblazon(maritsa, almira)\nEmblazon(colly, almira)\nCollarless(merrel)\nforall x (Emblazon(x, merrel) and Rape(merrel, colly) -> Rape(x, almira))\nforall x (Emblazon(x, maritsa) -> Collarless(maritsa))\nnot Emblazon(almira, colly) -> Yogic(colly)\nforall x (Emblazon(x, colly) and not Consent(colly, merrel) -> Consent(colly, almira))\nforall x (Collarless(x) -> Emblazon(x, maritsa))\nforall x (Consent(x, colly) and Emblazon(x, colly) -> Yogic(x))\n\nCollarless(maritsa)\n\nCollarless(merrel) and forall x (Collarless(x) -> Emblazon(x, maritsa)) -> therefore Emblazon(merrel, maritsa) Emblazon(merrel, maritsa) and forall x (Emblazon(x, maritsa) -> Collarless(maritsa)) -> therefore Collarless(maritsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The ram is unimpeded. The ram quiet the tudor. The joannes befriend the tudor. The joannes is unimpeded. The joannes quiet the ram. The tudor quiet the ram. The hasheem is volcanic. If someone quiet the hasheem and the hasheem rerun the tudor then they need the ram. If someone quiet the joannes then the joannes is volcanic. If the ram does not visit the tudor then the tudor is unfounded. If someone quiet the tudor and the tudor does not chase the hasheem then the tudor befriend the ram. If someone is volcanic then they visit the joannes. If someone befriend the tudor and they visit the tudor then they are unfounded. The joannes is not volcanic.", "logic": "\nUnimpeded(ram)\nQuiet(ram, tudor)\nBefriend(joannes, tudor)\nUnimpeded(joannes)\nQuiet(joannes, ram)\nQuiet(tudor, ram)\nVolcanic(hasheem)\nforall x (Quiet(x, hasheem) and Rerun(hasheem, tudor) -> Rerun(x, ram))\nforall x (Quiet(x, joannes) -> Volcanic(joannes))\nnot Quiet(ram, tudor) -> Unfounded(tudor)\nforall x (Quiet(x, tudor) and not Befriend(tudor, hasheem) -> Befriend(tudor, ram))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) -> Quiet(x, joannes))\nforall x (Befriend(x, tudor) and Quiet(x, tudor) -> Unfounded(x))\n\nnot Volcanic(joannes)\n\nVolcanic(hasheem) and forall x (Volcanic(x) -> Quiet(x, joannes)) -> therefore Quiet(hasheem, joannes) Quiet(hasheem, joannes) and forall x (Quiet(x, joannes) -> Volcanic(joannes)) -> therefore Volcanic(joannes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The rochelle is reformed. The rochelle overpay the marcelo. The elihu avalanche the marcelo. The elihu is reformed. The elihu overpay the rochelle. The marcelo overpay the rochelle. The luci is cussed. If someone overpay the luci and the luci founder the marcelo then they need the rochelle. If someone overpay the elihu then the elihu is cussed. If the rochelle does not visit the marcelo then the marcelo is staged. If someone overpay the marcelo and the marcelo does not chase the luci then the marcelo avalanche the rochelle. If someone is cussed then they visit the elihu. If someone avalanche the marcelo and they visit the marcelo then they are staged. The elihu overpay the elihu.", "logic": "\nReformed(rochelle)\nOverpay(rochelle, marcelo)\nAvalanche(elihu, marcelo)\nReformed(elihu)\nOverpay(elihu, rochelle)\nOverpay(marcelo, rochelle)\nCussed(luci)\nforall x (Overpay(x, luci) and Founder(luci, marcelo) -> Founder(x, rochelle))\nforall x (Overpay(x, elihu) -> Cussed(elihu))\nnot Overpay(rochelle, marcelo) -> Staged(marcelo)\nforall x (Overpay(x, marcelo) and not Avalanche(marcelo, luci) -> Avalanche(marcelo, rochelle))\nforall x (Cussed(x) -> Overpay(x, elihu))\nforall x (Avalanche(x, marcelo) and Overpay(x, marcelo) -> Staged(x))\n\nOverpay(elihu, elihu)\n\nCussed(luci) and forall x (Cussed(x) -> Overpay(x, elihu)) -> therefore Overpay(luci, elihu) Overpay(luci, elihu) and forall x (Overpay(x, elihu) -> Cussed(elihu)) -> therefore Cussed(elihu) Cussed(elihu) and forall x (Cussed(x) -> Overpay(x, elihu)) -> therefore Overpay(elihu, elihu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The mohammad is capitulary. The mohammad screen the lenka. The elwood expiate the lenka. The elwood is capitulary. The elwood screen the mohammad. The lenka screen the mohammad. The patricio is wizardly. If someone screen the patricio and the patricio efface the lenka then they need the mohammad. If someone screen the elwood then the elwood is wizardly. If the mohammad does not visit the lenka then the lenka is excessive. If someone screen the lenka and the lenka does not chase the patricio then the lenka expiate the mohammad. If someone is wizardly then they visit the elwood. If someone expiate the lenka and they visit the lenka then they are excessive. The elwood does not visit the elwood.", "logic": "\nCapitulary(mohammad)\nScreen(mohammad, lenka)\nExpiate(elwood, lenka)\nCapitulary(elwood)\nScreen(elwood, mohammad)\nScreen(lenka, mohammad)\nWizardly(patricio)\nforall x (Screen(x, patricio) and Efface(patricio, lenka) -> Efface(x, mohammad))\nforall x (Screen(x, elwood) -> Wizardly(elwood))\nnot Screen(mohammad, lenka) -> Excessive(lenka)\nforall x (Screen(x, lenka) and not Expiate(lenka, patricio) -> Expiate(lenka, mohammad))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Screen(x, elwood))\nforall x (Expiate(x, lenka) and Screen(x, lenka) -> Excessive(x))\n\nnot Screen(elwood, elwood)\n\nWizardly(patricio) and forall x (Wizardly(x) -> Screen(x, elwood)) -> therefore Screen(patricio, elwood) Screen(patricio, elwood) and forall x (Screen(x, elwood) -> Wizardly(elwood)) -> therefore Wizardly(elwood) Wizardly(elwood) and forall x (Wizardly(x) -> Screen(x, elwood)) -> therefore Screen(elwood, elwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The mellisa is humourless. The mellisa dehumidify the haskel. The sinclair batik the haskel. The sinclair is humourless. The sinclair dehumidify the mellisa. The haskel dehumidify the mellisa. The breanne is xviii. If someone dehumidify the breanne and the breanne fell the haskel then they need the mellisa. If someone dehumidify the sinclair then the sinclair is xviii. If the mellisa does not visit the haskel then the haskel is tritanopic. If someone dehumidify the haskel and the haskel does not chase the breanne then the haskel batik the mellisa. If someone is xviii then they visit the sinclair. If someone batik the haskel and they visit the haskel then they are tritanopic. The sinclair does not need the mellisa.", "logic": "\nHumourless(mellisa)\nDehumidify(mellisa, haskel)\nBatik(sinclair, haskel)\nHumourless(sinclair)\nDehumidify(sinclair, mellisa)\nDehumidify(haskel, mellisa)\nXviii(breanne)\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, breanne) and Fell(breanne, haskel) -> Fell(x, mellisa))\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, sinclair) -> Xviii(sinclair))\nnot Dehumidify(mellisa, haskel) -> Tritanopic(haskel)\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, haskel) and not Batik(haskel, breanne) -> Batik(haskel, mellisa))\nforall x (Xviii(x) -> Dehumidify(x, sinclair))\nforall x (Batik(x, haskel) and Dehumidify(x, haskel) -> Tritanopic(x))\n\nnot Fell(sinclair, mellisa)\n\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, breanne) and Fell(breanne, haskel) -> Fell(x, mellisa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The osbourne is ineffable. The osbourne advocate the lesley. The elly diagram the lesley. The elly is ineffable. The elly advocate the osbourne. The lesley advocate the osbourne. The genni is semidark. If someone advocate the genni and the genni velcro the lesley then they need the osbourne. If someone advocate the elly then the elly is semidark. If the osbourne does not visit the lesley then the lesley is coruscant. If someone advocate the lesley and the lesley does not chase the genni then the lesley diagram the osbourne. If someone is semidark then they visit the elly. If someone diagram the lesley and they visit the lesley then they are coruscant. The osbourne is coruscant.", "logic": "\nIneffable(osbourne)\nAdvocate(osbourne, lesley)\nDiagram(elly, lesley)\nIneffable(elly)\nAdvocate(elly, osbourne)\nAdvocate(lesley, osbourne)\nSemidark(genni)\nforall x (Advocate(x, genni) and Velcro(genni, lesley) -> Velcro(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Advocate(x, elly) -> Semidark(elly))\nnot Advocate(osbourne, lesley) -> Coruscant(lesley)\nforall x (Advocate(x, lesley) and not Diagram(lesley, genni) -> Diagram(lesley, osbourne))\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Advocate(x, elly))\nforall x (Diagram(x, lesley) and Advocate(x, lesley) -> Coruscant(x))\n\nCoruscant(osbourne)\n\nforall x (Diagram(x, lesley) and Advocate(x, lesley) -> Coruscant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The davie is manorial. The davie snowboard the albert. The henrie economise the albert. The henrie is manorial. The henrie snowboard the davie. The albert snowboard the davie. The krissie is ramate. If someone snowboard the krissie and the krissie preserve the albert then they need the davie. If someone snowboard the henrie then the henrie is ramate. If the davie does not visit the albert then the albert is minimalist. If someone snowboard the albert and the albert does not chase the krissie then the albert economise the davie. If someone is ramate then they visit the henrie. If someone economise the albert and they visit the albert then they are minimalist. The albert does not visit the henrie.", "logic": "\nManorial(davie)\nSnowboard(davie, albert)\nEconomise(henrie, albert)\nManorial(henrie)\nSnowboard(henrie, davie)\nSnowboard(albert, davie)\nRamate(krissie)\nforall x (Snowboard(x, krissie) and Preserve(krissie, albert) -> Preserve(x, davie))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, henrie) -> Ramate(henrie))\nnot Snowboard(davie, albert) -> Minimalist(albert)\nforall x (Snowboard(x, albert) and not Economise(albert, krissie) -> Economise(albert, davie))\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> Snowboard(x, henrie))\nforall x (Economise(x, albert) and Snowboard(x, albert) -> Minimalist(x))\n\nnot Snowboard(albert, henrie)\n\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> Snowboard(x, henrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The zitella is another. The zitella chitchat the gardener. The trever ingraft the gardener. The trever is another. The trever chitchat the zitella. The gardener chitchat the zitella. The judy is aestival. If someone chitchat the judy and the judy streetwalk the gardener then they need the zitella. If someone chitchat the trever then the trever is aestival. If the zitella does not visit the gardener then the gardener is nonskid. If someone chitchat the gardener and the gardener does not chase the judy then the gardener ingraft the zitella. If someone is aestival then they visit the trever. If someone ingraft the gardener and they visit the gardener then they are nonskid. The gardener is nonskid.", "logic": "\nAnother(zitella)\nChitchat(zitella, gardener)\nIngraft(trever, gardener)\nAnother(trever)\nChitchat(trever, zitella)\nChitchat(gardener, zitella)\nAestival(judy)\nforall x (Chitchat(x, judy) and Streetwalk(judy, gardener) -> Streetwalk(x, zitella))\nforall x (Chitchat(x, trever) -> Aestival(trever))\nnot Chitchat(zitella, gardener) -> Nonskid(gardener)\nforall x (Chitchat(x, gardener) and not Ingraft(gardener, judy) -> Ingraft(gardener, zitella))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Chitchat(x, trever))\nforall x (Ingraft(x, gardener) and Chitchat(x, gardener) -> Nonskid(x))\n\nNonskid(gardener)\n\nnot Chitchat(zitella, gardener) -> Nonskid(gardener) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The bree is lengthways. The bree deploy the gifford. The dickie sexualize the gifford. The dickie is lengthways. The dickie deploy the bree. The gifford deploy the bree. The sharl is dazzled. If someone deploy the sharl and the sharl chicane the gifford then they need the bree. If someone deploy the dickie then the dickie is dazzled. If the bree does not visit the gifford then the gifford is unvigilant. If someone deploy the gifford and the gifford does not chase the sharl then the gifford sexualize the bree. If someone is dazzled then they visit the dickie. If someone sexualize the gifford and they visit the gifford then they are unvigilant. The dickie does not need the dickie.", "logic": "\nLengthways(bree)\nDeploy(bree, gifford)\nSexualize(dickie, gifford)\nLengthways(dickie)\nDeploy(dickie, bree)\nDeploy(gifford, bree)\nDazzled(sharl)\nforall x (Deploy(x, sharl) and Chicane(sharl, gifford) -> Chicane(x, bree))\nforall x (Deploy(x, dickie) -> Dazzled(dickie))\nnot Deploy(bree, gifford) -> Unvigilant(gifford)\nforall x (Deploy(x, gifford) and not Sexualize(gifford, sharl) -> Sexualize(gifford, bree))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) -> Deploy(x, dickie))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, gifford) and Deploy(x, gifford) -> Unvigilant(x))\n\nnot Chicane(dickie, dickie)\n\nnot Chicane(dickie, dickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The bertina is truthful. The bertina airmail the clay. The peggy festoon the clay. The peggy is truthful. The peggy airmail the bertina. The clay airmail the bertina. The saw is noncaloric. If someone airmail the saw and the saw moor the clay then they need the bertina. If someone airmail the peggy then the peggy is noncaloric. If the bertina does not visit the clay then the clay is licit. If someone airmail the clay and the clay does not chase the saw then the clay festoon the bertina. If someone is noncaloric then they visit the peggy. If someone festoon the clay and they visit the clay then they are licit. The peggy moor the saw.", "logic": "\nTruthful(bertina)\nAirmail(bertina, clay)\nFestoon(peggy, clay)\nTruthful(peggy)\nAirmail(peggy, bertina)\nAirmail(clay, bertina)\nNoncaloric(saw)\nforall x (Airmail(x, saw) and Moor(saw, clay) -> Moor(x, bertina))\nforall x (Airmail(x, peggy) -> Noncaloric(peggy))\nnot Airmail(bertina, clay) -> Licit(clay)\nforall x (Airmail(x, clay) and not Festoon(clay, saw) -> Festoon(clay, bertina))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Airmail(x, peggy))\nforall x (Festoon(x, clay) and Airmail(x, clay) -> Licit(x))\n\nMoor(peggy, saw)\n\nMoor(peggy, saw) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The tessi is unwilling. The tessi refashion the lindy. The adolphe replace the lindy. The adolphe is unwilling. The adolphe refashion the tessi. The lindy refashion the tessi. The korrie is seaward. If someone refashion the korrie and the korrie overjoy the lindy then they need the tessi. If someone refashion the adolphe then the adolphe is seaward. If the tessi does not visit the lindy then the lindy is grievous. If someone refashion the lindy and the lindy does not chase the korrie then the lindy replace the tessi. If someone is seaward then they visit the adolphe. If someone replace the lindy and they visit the lindy then they are grievous. The adolphe does not chase the tessi.", "logic": "\nUnwilling(tessi)\nRefashion(tessi, lindy)\nReplace(adolphe, lindy)\nUnwilling(adolphe)\nRefashion(adolphe, tessi)\nRefashion(lindy, tessi)\nSeaward(korrie)\nforall x (Refashion(x, korrie) and Overjoy(korrie, lindy) -> Overjoy(x, tessi))\nforall x (Refashion(x, adolphe) -> Seaward(adolphe))\nnot Refashion(tessi, lindy) -> Grievous(lindy)\nforall x (Refashion(x, lindy) and not Replace(lindy, korrie) -> Replace(lindy, tessi))\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Refashion(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Replace(x, lindy) and Refashion(x, lindy) -> Grievous(x))\n\nnot Replace(adolphe, tessi)\n\nnot Replace(adolphe, tessi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The sisile is narcotised. The sisile reassemble the lianne. The stephine foreswear the lianne. The stephine is narcotised. The stephine reassemble the sisile. The lianne reassemble the sisile. The winfred is twee. If someone reassemble the winfred and the winfred braise the lianne then they need the sisile. If someone reassemble the stephine then the stephine is twee. If the sisile does not visit the lianne then the lianne is conveyable. If someone reassemble the lianne and the lianne does not chase the winfred then the lianne foreswear the sisile. If someone is twee then they visit the stephine. If someone foreswear the lianne and they visit the lianne then they are conveyable. The stephine reassemble the winfred.", "logic": "\nNarcotised(sisile)\nReassemble(sisile, lianne)\nForeswear(stephine, lianne)\nNarcotised(stephine)\nReassemble(stephine, sisile)\nReassemble(lianne, sisile)\nTwee(winfred)\nforall x (Reassemble(x, winfred) and Braise(winfred, lianne) -> Braise(x, sisile))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, stephine) -> Twee(stephine))\nnot Reassemble(sisile, lianne) -> Conveyable(lianne)\nforall x (Reassemble(x, lianne) and not Foreswear(lianne, winfred) -> Foreswear(lianne, sisile))\nforall x (Twee(x) -> Reassemble(x, stephine))\nforall x (Foreswear(x, lianne) and Reassemble(x, lianne) -> Conveyable(x))\n\nReassemble(stephine, winfred)\n\nReassemble(stephine, winfred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "Carol is not magnetized. Ellissa is magnetized. Faustine is unethical. If something is unstuck and not magnetized then it is guardant. Round things are unethical. If Faustine is colourless and Faustine is oleophobic then Faustine is unstuck. All unethical things are colourless. If Carol is guardant and Carol is oleophobic then Carol is not unstuck. All colourless things are unstuck. Carol is not magnetized.", "logic": "\nnot Magnetized(carol)\nMagnetized(ellissa)\nUnethical(faustine)\nforall x (Unstuck(x) and not Magnetized(x) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Unethical(x))\nColourless(faustine) and Oleophobic(faustine) -> Unstuck(faustine)\nforall x (Unethical(x) -> Colourless(x))\nGuardant(carol) and Oleophobic(carol) -> not Unstuck(carol)\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Unstuck(x))\n\nnot Magnetized(carol)\n\ntherefore not Magnetized(carol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Madelene is not catching. Rhodia is catching. Xaviera is sniffly. If something is doctoral and not catching then it is rheumatic. Round things are sniffly. If Xaviera is decurved and Xaviera is spiffing then Xaviera is doctoral. All sniffly things are decurved. If Madelene is rheumatic and Madelene is spiffing then Madelene is not doctoral. All decurved things are doctoral. Xaviera is not sniffly.", "logic": "\nnot Catching(madelene)\nCatching(rhodia)\nSniffly(xaviera)\nforall x (Doctoral(x) and not Catching(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Sniffly(x))\nDecurved(xaviera) and Spiffing(xaviera) -> Doctoral(xaviera)\nforall x (Sniffly(x) -> Decurved(x))\nRheumatic(madelene) and Spiffing(madelene) -> not Doctoral(madelene)\nforall x (Decurved(x) -> Doctoral(x))\n\nnot Sniffly(xaviera)\n\ntherefore Sniffly(xaviera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Brynn is not bodily. Dari is bodily. Prasad is reversive. If something is libidinous and not bodily then it is antic. Round things are reversive. If Prasad is pinkish and Prasad is countless then Prasad is libidinous. All reversive things are pinkish. If Brynn is antic and Brynn is countless then Brynn is not libidinous. All pinkish things are libidinous. Dari is reversive.", "logic": "\nnot Bodily(brynn)\nBodily(dari)\nReversive(prasad)\nforall x (Libidinous(x) and not Bodily(x) -> Antic(x))\nforall x (Bodily(x) -> Reversive(x))\nPinkish(prasad) and Countless(prasad) -> Libidinous(prasad)\nforall x (Reversive(x) -> Pinkish(x))\nAntic(brynn) and Countless(brynn) -> not Libidinous(brynn)\nforall x (Pinkish(x) -> Libidinous(x))\n\nReversive(dari)\n\nBodily(dari) and forall x (Bodily(x) -> Reversive(x)) -> therefore Reversive(dari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Sheree is not hidden. Kari is hidden. Sherwin is dermic. If something is dutiable and not hidden then it is univocal. Round things are dermic. If Sherwin is strong and Sherwin is futureless then Sherwin is dutiable. All dermic things are strong. If Sheree is univocal and Sheree is futureless then Sheree is not dutiable. All strong things are dutiable. Kari is not dermic.", "logic": "\nnot Hidden(sheree)\nHidden(kari)\nDermic(sherwin)\nforall x (Dutiable(x) and not Hidden(x) -> Univocal(x))\nforall x (Hidden(x) -> Dermic(x))\nStrong(sherwin) and Futureless(sherwin) -> Dutiable(sherwin)\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> Strong(x))\nUnivocal(sheree) and Futureless(sheree) -> not Dutiable(sheree)\nforall x (Strong(x) -> Dutiable(x))\n\nnot Dermic(kari)\n\nHidden(kari) and forall x (Hidden(x) -> Dermic(x)) -> therefore Dermic(kari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Gilberta is not lowbred. Ronnica is lowbred. Ferdie is throaty. If something is semiannual and not lowbred then it is falcate. Round things are throaty. If Ferdie is born and Ferdie is pillared then Ferdie is semiannual. All throaty things are born. If Gilberta is falcate and Gilberta is pillared then Gilberta is not semiannual. All born things are semiannual. Ferdie is semiannual.", "logic": "\nnot Lowbred(gilberta)\nLowbred(ronnica)\nThroaty(ferdie)\nforall x (Semiannual(x) and not Lowbred(x) -> Falcate(x))\nforall x (Lowbred(x) -> Throaty(x))\nBorn(ferdie) and Pillared(ferdie) -> Semiannual(ferdie)\nforall x (Throaty(x) -> Born(x))\nFalcate(gilberta) and Pillared(gilberta) -> not Semiannual(gilberta)\nforall x (Born(x) -> Semiannual(x))\n\nSemiannual(ferdie)\n\nThroaty(ferdie) and forall x (Throaty(x) -> Born(x)) -> therefore Born(ferdie) Born(ferdie) and forall x (Born(x) -> Semiannual(x)) -> therefore Semiannual(ferdie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Alisun is not baltic. Klarika is baltic. Geoff is sparing. If something is soulless and not baltic then it is gracious. Round things are sparing. If Geoff is grudging and Geoff is azoic then Geoff is soulless. All sparing things are grudging. If Alisun is gracious and Alisun is azoic then Alisun is not soulless. All grudging things are soulless. Klarika is not grudging.", "logic": "\nnot Baltic(alisun)\nBaltic(klarika)\nSparing(geoff)\nforall x (Soulless(x) and not Baltic(x) -> Gracious(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) -> Sparing(x))\nGrudging(geoff) and Azoic(geoff) -> Soulless(geoff)\nforall x (Sparing(x) -> Grudging(x))\nGracious(alisun) and Azoic(alisun) -> not Soulless(alisun)\nforall x (Grudging(x) -> Soulless(x))\n\nnot Grudging(klarika)\n\nBaltic(klarika) and forall x (Baltic(x) -> Sparing(x)) -> therefore Sparing(klarika) Sparing(klarika) and forall x (Sparing(x) -> Grudging(x)) -> therefore Grudging(klarika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Samson is not choky. Bobine is choky. Husain is laughable. If something is maledict and not choky then it is pulmonic. Round things are laughable. If Husain is arabic and Husain is bellied then Husain is maledict. All laughable things are arabic. If Samson is pulmonic and Samson is bellied then Samson is not maledict. All arabic things are maledict. Bobine is maledict.", "logic": "\nnot Choky(samson)\nChoky(bobine)\nLaughable(husain)\nforall x (Maledict(x) and not Choky(x) -> Pulmonic(x))\nforall x (Choky(x) -> Laughable(x))\nArabic(husain) and Bellied(husain) -> Maledict(husain)\nforall x (Laughable(x) -> Arabic(x))\nPulmonic(samson) and Bellied(samson) -> not Maledict(samson)\nforall x (Arabic(x) -> Maledict(x))\n\nMaledict(bobine)\n\nChoky(bobine) and forall x (Choky(x) -> Laughable(x)) -> therefore Laughable(bobine) Laughable(bobine) and forall x (Laughable(x) -> Arabic(x)) -> therefore Arabic(bobine) Arabic(bobine) and forall x (Arabic(x) -> Maledict(x)) -> therefore Maledict(bobine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Gusti is not papillary. Tiana is papillary. Shirl is poky. If something is random and not papillary then it is undamaged. Round things are poky. If Shirl is deadlocked and Shirl is lucid then Shirl is random. All poky things are deadlocked. If Gusti is undamaged and Gusti is lucid then Gusti is not random. All deadlocked things are random. Tiana is not random.", "logic": "\nnot Papillary(gusti)\nPapillary(tiana)\nPoky(shirl)\nforall x (Random(x) and not Papillary(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nforall x (Papillary(x) -> Poky(x))\nDeadlocked(shirl) and Lucid(shirl) -> Random(shirl)\nforall x (Poky(x) -> Deadlocked(x))\nUndamaged(gusti) and Lucid(gusti) -> not Random(gusti)\nforall x (Deadlocked(x) -> Random(x))\n\nnot Random(tiana)\n\nPapillary(tiana) and forall x (Papillary(x) -> Poky(x)) -> therefore Poky(tiana) Poky(tiana) and forall x (Poky(x) -> Deadlocked(x)) -> therefore Deadlocked(tiana) Deadlocked(tiana) and forall x (Deadlocked(x) -> Random(x)) -> therefore Random(tiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Catriona is not weaned. Sabine is weaned. Harvie is lapidarian. If something is seeping and not weaned then it is fractious. Round things are lapidarian. If Harvie is malcontent and Harvie is stilly then Harvie is seeping. All lapidarian things are malcontent. If Catriona is fractious and Catriona is stilly then Catriona is not seeping. All malcontent things are seeping. Harvie is not fractious.", "logic": "\nnot Weaned(catriona)\nWeaned(sabine)\nLapidarian(harvie)\nforall x (Seeping(x) and not Weaned(x) -> Fractious(x))\nforall x (Weaned(x) -> Lapidarian(x))\nMalcontent(harvie) and Stilly(harvie) -> Seeping(harvie)\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) -> Malcontent(x))\nFractious(catriona) and Stilly(catriona) -> not Seeping(catriona)\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Seeping(x))\n\nnot Fractious(harvie)\n\nforall x (Seeping(x) and not Weaned(x) -> Fractious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Barnabe is not ochre. Paul is ochre. Jamey is lightproof. If something is achromatic and not ochre then it is venerating. Round things are lightproof. If Jamey is columned and Jamey is darkling then Jamey is achromatic. All lightproof things are columned. If Barnabe is venerating and Barnabe is darkling then Barnabe is not achromatic. All columned things are achromatic. Barnabe is venerating.", "logic": "\nnot Ochre(barnabe)\nOchre(paul)\nLightproof(jamey)\nforall x (Achromatic(x) and not Ochre(x) -> Venerating(x))\nforall x (Ochre(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nColumned(jamey) and Darkling(jamey) -> Achromatic(jamey)\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Columned(x))\nVenerating(barnabe) and Darkling(barnabe) -> not Achromatic(barnabe)\nforall x (Columned(x) -> Achromatic(x))\n\nVenerating(barnabe)\n\nforall x (Achromatic(x) and not Ochre(x) -> Venerating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Rajeev is not sedentary. Fern is sedentary. Roni is fitted. If something is obsequious and not sedentary then it is unadvised. Round things are fitted. If Roni is virgin and Roni is teeny then Roni is obsequious. All fitted things are virgin. If Rajeev is unadvised and Rajeev is teeny then Rajeev is not obsequious. All virgin things are obsequious. Rajeev is not fitted.", "logic": "\nnot Sedentary(rajeev)\nSedentary(fern)\nFitted(roni)\nforall x (Obsequious(x) and not Sedentary(x) -> Unadvised(x))\nforall x (Sedentary(x) -> Fitted(x))\nVirgin(roni) and Teeny(roni) -> Obsequious(roni)\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Virgin(x))\nUnadvised(rajeev) and Teeny(rajeev) -> not Obsequious(rajeev)\nforall x (Virgin(x) -> Obsequious(x))\n\nnot Fitted(rajeev)\n\nforall x (Sedentary(x) -> Fitted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Nada is not covert. Gretel is covert. Eleonora is pixilated. If something is unscripted and not covert then it is senegalese. Round things are pixilated. If Eleonora is condolent and Eleonora is honourable then Eleonora is unscripted. All pixilated things are condolent. If Nada is senegalese and Nada is honourable then Nada is not unscripted. All condolent things are unscripted. Gretel is senegalese.", "logic": "\nnot Covert(nada)\nCovert(gretel)\nPixilated(eleonora)\nforall x (Unscripted(x) and not Covert(x) -> Senegalese(x))\nforall x (Covert(x) -> Pixilated(x))\nCondolent(eleonora) and Honourable(eleonora) -> Unscripted(eleonora)\nforall x (Pixilated(x) -> Condolent(x))\nSenegalese(nada) and Honourable(nada) -> not Unscripted(nada)\nforall x (Condolent(x) -> Unscripted(x))\n\nSenegalese(gretel)\n\nforall x (Unscripted(x) and not Covert(x) -> Senegalese(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Erich is not disabling. Miguelita is disabling. Nicholle is hydroponic. If something is glabellar and not disabling then it is tragical. Round things are hydroponic. If Nicholle is dissenting and Nicholle is ascetical then Nicholle is glabellar. All hydroponic things are dissenting. If Erich is tragical and Erich is ascetical then Erich is not glabellar. All dissenting things are glabellar. Miguelita is not kind.", "logic": "\nnot Disabling(erich)\nDisabling(miguelita)\nHydroponic(nicholle)\nforall x (Glabellar(x) and not Disabling(x) -> Tragical(x))\nforall x (Disabling(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nDissenting(nicholle) and Ascetical(nicholle) -> Glabellar(nicholle)\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Dissenting(x))\nTragical(erich) and Ascetical(erich) -> not Glabellar(erich)\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Glabellar(x))\n\nnot Kind(miguelita)\n\nnot Kind(miguelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Daile is not amnesiac. Leanna is amnesiac. Neron is brutal. If something is tittering and not amnesiac then it is darling. Round things are brutal. If Neron is squawky and Neron is suborbital then Neron is tittering. All brutal things are squawky. If Daile is darling and Daile is suborbital then Daile is not tittering. All squawky things are tittering. Daile is suborbital.", "logic": "\nnot Amnesiac(daile)\nAmnesiac(leanna)\nBrutal(neron)\nforall x (Tittering(x) and not Amnesiac(x) -> Darling(x))\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) -> Brutal(x))\nSquawky(neron) and Suborbital(neron) -> Tittering(neron)\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Squawky(x))\nDarling(daile) and Suborbital(daile) -> not Tittering(daile)\nforall x (Squawky(x) -> Tittering(x))\n\nSuborbital(daile)\n\nSuborbital(daile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Louella is not provincial. Parwane is provincial. Lottie is omniscient. If something is imprisoned and not provincial then it is palpable. Round things are omniscient. If Lottie is fanciful and Lottie is diminished then Lottie is imprisoned. All omniscient things are fanciful. If Louella is palpable and Louella is diminished then Louella is not imprisoned. All fanciful things are imprisoned. Lottie is not kind.", "logic": "\nnot Provincial(louella)\nProvincial(parwane)\nOmniscient(lottie)\nforall x (Imprisoned(x) and not Provincial(x) -> Palpable(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nFanciful(lottie) and Diminished(lottie) -> Imprisoned(lottie)\nforall x (Omniscient(x) -> Fanciful(x))\nPalpable(louella) and Diminished(louella) -> not Imprisoned(louella)\nforall x (Fanciful(x) -> Imprisoned(x))\n\nnot Kind(lottie)\n\nnot Kind(lottie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Willow is not chapped. Shanon is chapped. Ivy is antenatal. If something is mormon and not chapped then it is subocean. Round things are antenatal. If Ivy is bosnian and Ivy is reechoing then Ivy is mormon. All antenatal things are bosnian. If Willow is subocean and Willow is reechoing then Willow is not mormon. All bosnian things are mormon. Ivy is reechoing.", "logic": "\nnot Chapped(willow)\nChapped(shanon)\nAntenatal(ivy)\nforall x (Mormon(x) and not Chapped(x) -> Subocean(x))\nforall x (Chapped(x) -> Antenatal(x))\nBosnian(ivy) and Reechoing(ivy) -> Mormon(ivy)\nforall x (Antenatal(x) -> Bosnian(x))\nSubocean(willow) and Reechoing(willow) -> not Mormon(willow)\nforall x (Bosnian(x) -> Mormon(x))\n\nReechoing(ivy)\n\nReechoing(ivy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The walther rebel the doreen. The tiphani is facile. The doreen litigate the tiphani. If the tiphani rebel the walther then the walther shutter the doreen. If something is facile then it rebel the walther. If something is vinous and bottomed then it shutter the doreen. If something shutter the doreen then the doreen litigate the walther. If something is facile and bottomed then it litigate the walther. If the tiphani is facile and the doreen does not eat the tiphani then the tiphani does not like the walther. If something litigate the walther then the walther litigate the tiphani. If the doreen does not chase the walther and the doreen does not like the tiphani then the doreen does not chase the tiphani. The doreen litigate the tiphani.", "logic": "\nRebel(walther, doreen)\nFacile(tiphani)\nLitigate(doreen, tiphani)\nRebel(tiphani, walther) -> Shutter(walther, doreen)\nforall x (Facile(x) -> Rebel(x, walther))\nforall x (Vinous(x) and Bottomed(x) -> Shutter(x, doreen))\nforall x (Shutter(x, doreen) -> Litigate(doreen, walther))\nforall x (Facile(x) and Bottomed(x) -> Litigate(x, walther))\nFacile(tiphani) and not Rebel(doreen, tiphani) -> not Shutter(tiphani, walther)\nforall x (Litigate(x, walther) -> Litigate(walther, tiphani))\nnot Litigate(doreen, walther) and not Shutter(doreen, tiphani) -> not Litigate(doreen, tiphani)\n\nLitigate(doreen, tiphani)\n\ntherefore Litigate(doreen, tiphani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The chriss misread the jeff. The valentina is umber. The jeff comprehend the valentina. If the valentina misread the chriss then the chriss postmark the jeff. If something is umber then it misread the chriss. If something is crazy and unpillared then it postmark the jeff. If something postmark the jeff then the jeff comprehend the chriss. If something is umber and unpillared then it comprehend the chriss. If the valentina is umber and the jeff does not eat the valentina then the valentina does not like the chriss. If something comprehend the chriss then the chriss comprehend the valentina. If the jeff does not chase the chriss and the jeff does not like the valentina then the jeff does not chase the valentina. The valentina is not umber.", "logic": "\nMisread(chriss, jeff)\nUmber(valentina)\nComprehend(jeff, valentina)\nMisread(valentina, chriss) -> Postmark(chriss, jeff)\nforall x (Umber(x) -> Misread(x, chriss))\nforall x (Crazy(x) and Unpillared(x) -> Postmark(x, jeff))\nforall x (Postmark(x, jeff) -> Comprehend(jeff, chriss))\nforall x (Umber(x) and Unpillared(x) -> Comprehend(x, chriss))\nUmber(valentina) and not Misread(jeff, valentina) -> not Postmark(valentina, chriss)\nforall x (Comprehend(x, chriss) -> Comprehend(chriss, valentina))\nnot Comprehend(jeff, chriss) and not Postmark(jeff, valentina) -> not Comprehend(jeff, valentina)\n\nnot Umber(valentina)\n\ntherefore Umber(valentina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The kevan visualise the celene. The anjanette is plumping. The celene muddy the anjanette. If the anjanette visualise the kevan then the kevan dissever the celene. If something is plumping then it visualise the kevan. If something is warped and isomeric then it dissever the celene. If something dissever the celene then the celene muddy the kevan. If something is plumping and isomeric then it muddy the kevan. If the anjanette is plumping and the celene does not eat the anjanette then the anjanette does not like the kevan. If something muddy the kevan then the kevan muddy the anjanette. If the celene does not chase the kevan and the celene does not like the anjanette then the celene does not chase the anjanette. The anjanette visualise the kevan.", "logic": "\nVisualise(kevan, celene)\nPlumping(anjanette)\nMuddy(celene, anjanette)\nVisualise(anjanette, kevan) -> Dissever(kevan, celene)\nforall x (Plumping(x) -> Visualise(x, kevan))\nforall x (Warped(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Dissever(x, celene))\nforall x (Dissever(x, celene) -> Muddy(celene, kevan))\nforall x (Plumping(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Muddy(x, kevan))\nPlumping(anjanette) and not Visualise(celene, anjanette) -> not Dissever(anjanette, kevan)\nforall x (Muddy(x, kevan) -> Muddy(kevan, anjanette))\nnot Muddy(celene, kevan) and not Dissever(celene, anjanette) -> not Muddy(celene, anjanette)\n\nVisualise(anjanette, kevan)\n\nPlumping(anjanette) and forall x (Plumping(x) -> Visualise(x, kevan)) -> therefore Visualise(anjanette, kevan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The clari parody the annalena. The boyce is melted. The annalena corkscrew the boyce. If the boyce parody the clari then the clari wrench the annalena. If something is melted then it parody the clari. If something is angry and stabile then it wrench the annalena. If something wrench the annalena then the annalena corkscrew the clari. If something is melted and stabile then it corkscrew the clari. If the boyce is melted and the annalena does not eat the boyce then the boyce does not like the clari. If something corkscrew the clari then the clari corkscrew the boyce. If the annalena does not chase the clari and the annalena does not like the boyce then the annalena does not chase the boyce. The boyce does not eat the clari.", "logic": "\nParody(clari, annalena)\nMelted(boyce)\nCorkscrew(annalena, boyce)\nParody(boyce, clari) -> Wrench(clari, annalena)\nforall x (Melted(x) -> Parody(x, clari))\nforall x (Angry(x) and Stabile(x) -> Wrench(x, annalena))\nforall x (Wrench(x, annalena) -> Corkscrew(annalena, clari))\nforall x (Melted(x) and Stabile(x) -> Corkscrew(x, clari))\nMelted(boyce) and not Parody(annalena, boyce) -> not Wrench(boyce, clari)\nforall x (Corkscrew(x, clari) -> Corkscrew(clari, boyce))\nnot Corkscrew(annalena, clari) and not Wrench(annalena, boyce) -> not Corkscrew(annalena, boyce)\n\nnot Parody(boyce, clari)\n\nMelted(boyce) and forall x (Melted(x) -> Parody(x, clari)) -> therefore Parody(boyce, clari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The allina pockmark the valeria. The darda is content. The valeria thank the darda. If the darda pockmark the allina then the allina accouter the valeria. If something is content then it pockmark the allina. If something is assertive and iodized then it accouter the valeria. If something accouter the valeria then the valeria thank the allina. If something is content and iodized then it thank the allina. If the darda is content and the valeria does not eat the darda then the darda does not like the allina. If something thank the allina then the allina thank the darda. If the valeria does not chase the allina and the valeria does not like the darda then the valeria does not chase the darda. The allina accouter the valeria.", "logic": "\nPockmark(allina, valeria)\nContent(darda)\nThank(valeria, darda)\nPockmark(darda, allina) -> Accouter(allina, valeria)\nforall x (Content(x) -> Pockmark(x, allina))\nforall x (Assertive(x) and Iodized(x) -> Accouter(x, valeria))\nforall x (Accouter(x, valeria) -> Thank(valeria, allina))\nforall x (Content(x) and Iodized(x) -> Thank(x, allina))\nContent(darda) and not Pockmark(valeria, darda) -> not Accouter(darda, allina)\nforall x (Thank(x, allina) -> Thank(allina, darda))\nnot Thank(valeria, allina) and not Accouter(valeria, darda) -> not Thank(valeria, darda)\n\nAccouter(allina, valeria)\n\nContent(darda) and forall x (Content(x) -> Pockmark(x, allina)) -> therefore Pockmark(darda, allina) Pockmark(darda, allina) and Pockmark(darda, allina) -> Accouter(allina, valeria) -> therefore Accouter(allina, valeria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The antonin skive the roze. The celestia is derived. The roze realise the celestia. If the celestia skive the antonin then the antonin picture the roze. If something is derived then it skive the antonin. If something is tempering and antonymous then it picture the roze. If something picture the roze then the roze realise the antonin. If something is derived and antonymous then it realise the antonin. If the celestia is derived and the roze does not eat the celestia then the celestia does not like the antonin. If something realise the antonin then the antonin realise the celestia. If the roze does not chase the antonin and the roze does not like the celestia then the roze does not chase the celestia. The antonin does not like the roze.", "logic": "\nSkive(antonin, roze)\nDerived(celestia)\nRealise(roze, celestia)\nSkive(celestia, antonin) -> Picture(antonin, roze)\nforall x (Derived(x) -> Skive(x, antonin))\nforall x (Tempering(x) and Antonymous(x) -> Picture(x, roze))\nforall x (Picture(x, roze) -> Realise(roze, antonin))\nforall x (Derived(x) and Antonymous(x) -> Realise(x, antonin))\nDerived(celestia) and not Skive(roze, celestia) -> not Picture(celestia, antonin)\nforall x (Realise(x, antonin) -> Realise(antonin, celestia))\nnot Realise(roze, antonin) and not Picture(roze, celestia) -> not Realise(roze, celestia)\n\nnot Picture(antonin, roze)\n\nDerived(celestia) and forall x (Derived(x) -> Skive(x, antonin)) -> therefore Skive(celestia, antonin) Skive(celestia, antonin) and Skive(celestia, antonin) -> Picture(antonin, roze) -> therefore Picture(antonin, roze)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The lorilyn relyric the felice. The lilith is polyphase. The felice debar the lilith. If the lilith relyric the lorilyn then the lorilyn retrofit the felice. If something is polyphase then it relyric the lorilyn. If something is mnemonic and lapidarian then it retrofit the felice. If something retrofit the felice then the felice debar the lorilyn. If something is polyphase and lapidarian then it debar the lorilyn. If the lilith is polyphase and the felice does not eat the lilith then the lilith does not like the lorilyn. If something debar the lorilyn then the lorilyn debar the lilith. If the felice does not chase the lorilyn and the felice does not like the lilith then the felice does not chase the lilith. The felice debar the lorilyn.", "logic": "\nRelyric(lorilyn, felice)\nPolyphase(lilith)\nDebar(felice, lilith)\nRelyric(lilith, lorilyn) -> Retrofit(lorilyn, felice)\nforall x (Polyphase(x) -> Relyric(x, lorilyn))\nforall x (Mnemonic(x) and Lapidarian(x) -> Retrofit(x, felice))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, felice) -> Debar(felice, lorilyn))\nforall x (Polyphase(x) and Lapidarian(x) -> Debar(x, lorilyn))\nPolyphase(lilith) and not Relyric(felice, lilith) -> not Retrofit(lilith, lorilyn)\nforall x (Debar(x, lorilyn) -> Debar(lorilyn, lilith))\nnot Debar(felice, lorilyn) and not Retrofit(felice, lilith) -> not Debar(felice, lilith)\n\nDebar(felice, lorilyn)\n\nPolyphase(lilith) and forall x (Polyphase(x) -> Relyric(x, lorilyn)) -> therefore Relyric(lilith, lorilyn) Relyric(lilith, lorilyn) and Relyric(lilith, lorilyn) -> Retrofit(lorilyn, felice) -> therefore Retrofit(lorilyn, felice) Retrofit(lorilyn, felice) and forall x (Retrofit(x, felice) -> Debar(felice, lorilyn)) -> therefore Debar(felice, lorilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The callida hunger the roby. The elaine is struggling. The roby privatize the elaine. If the elaine hunger the callida then the callida severalise the roby. If something is struggling then it hunger the callida. If something is screaming and topped then it severalise the roby. If something severalise the roby then the roby privatize the callida. If something is struggling and topped then it privatize the callida. If the elaine is struggling and the roby does not eat the elaine then the elaine does not like the callida. If something privatize the callida then the callida privatize the elaine. If the roby does not chase the callida and the roby does not like the elaine then the roby does not chase the elaine. The roby does not chase the callida.", "logic": "\nHunger(callida, roby)\nStruggling(elaine)\nPrivatize(roby, elaine)\nHunger(elaine, callida) -> Severalise(callida, roby)\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Hunger(x, callida))\nforall x (Screaming(x) and Topped(x) -> Severalise(x, roby))\nforall x (Severalise(x, roby) -> Privatize(roby, callida))\nforall x (Struggling(x) and Topped(x) -> Privatize(x, callida))\nStruggling(elaine) and not Hunger(roby, elaine) -> not Severalise(elaine, callida)\nforall x (Privatize(x, callida) -> Privatize(callida, elaine))\nnot Privatize(roby, callida) and not Severalise(roby, elaine) -> not Privatize(roby, elaine)\n\nnot Privatize(roby, callida)\n\nStruggling(elaine) and forall x (Struggling(x) -> Hunger(x, callida)) -> therefore Hunger(elaine, callida) Hunger(elaine, callida) and Hunger(elaine, callida) -> Severalise(callida, roby) -> therefore Severalise(callida, roby) Severalise(callida, roby) and forall x (Severalise(x, roby) -> Privatize(roby, callida)) -> therefore Privatize(roby, callida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The arron sulphur the sybil. The kaylil is winning. The sybil sweep the kaylil. If the kaylil sulphur the arron then the arron stoop the sybil. If something is winning then it sulphur the arron. If something is unsoiled and crude then it stoop the sybil. If something stoop the sybil then the sybil sweep the arron. If something is winning and crude then it sweep the arron. If the kaylil is winning and the sybil does not eat the kaylil then the kaylil does not like the arron. If something sweep the arron then the arron sweep the kaylil. If the sybil does not chase the arron and the sybil does not like the kaylil then the sybil does not chase the kaylil. The kaylil does not like the sybil.", "logic": "\nSulphur(arron, sybil)\nWinning(kaylil)\nSweep(sybil, kaylil)\nSulphur(kaylil, arron) -> Stoop(arron, sybil)\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Sulphur(x, arron))\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) and Crude(x) -> Stoop(x, sybil))\nforall x (Stoop(x, sybil) -> Sweep(sybil, arron))\nforall x (Winning(x) and Crude(x) -> Sweep(x, arron))\nWinning(kaylil) and not Sulphur(sybil, kaylil) -> not Stoop(kaylil, arron)\nforall x (Sweep(x, arron) -> Sweep(arron, kaylil))\nnot Sweep(sybil, arron) and not Stoop(sybil, kaylil) -> not Sweep(sybil, kaylil)\n\nnot Stoop(kaylil, sybil)\n\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) and Crude(x) -> Stoop(x, sybil)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The annora wade the mahmoud. The rania is azonal. The mahmoud whop the rania. If the rania wade the annora then the annora supple the mahmoud. If something is azonal then it wade the annora. If something is optic and washable then it supple the mahmoud. If something supple the mahmoud then the mahmoud whop the annora. If something is azonal and washable then it whop the annora. If the rania is azonal and the mahmoud does not eat the rania then the rania does not like the annora. If something whop the annora then the annora whop the rania. If the mahmoud does not chase the annora and the mahmoud does not like the rania then the mahmoud does not chase the rania. The mahmoud supple the mahmoud.", "logic": "\nWade(annora, mahmoud)\nAzonal(rania)\nWhop(mahmoud, rania)\nWade(rania, annora) -> Supple(annora, mahmoud)\nforall x (Azonal(x) -> Wade(x, annora))\nforall x (Optic(x) and Washable(x) -> Supple(x, mahmoud))\nforall x (Supple(x, mahmoud) -> Whop(mahmoud, annora))\nforall x (Azonal(x) and Washable(x) -> Whop(x, annora))\nAzonal(rania) and not Wade(mahmoud, rania) -> not Supple(rania, annora)\nforall x (Whop(x, annora) -> Whop(annora, rania))\nnot Whop(mahmoud, annora) and not Supple(mahmoud, rania) -> not Whop(mahmoud, rania)\n\nSupple(mahmoud, mahmoud)\n\nforall x (Optic(x) and Washable(x) -> Supple(x, mahmoud)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The albrecht silhouette the marybeth. The sheffield is departed. The marybeth strum the sheffield. If the sheffield silhouette the albrecht then the albrecht bide the marybeth. If something is departed then it silhouette the albrecht. If something is undomestic and insecure then it bide the marybeth. If something bide the marybeth then the marybeth strum the albrecht. If something is departed and insecure then it strum the albrecht. If the sheffield is departed and the marybeth does not eat the sheffield then the sheffield does not like the albrecht. If something strum the albrecht then the albrecht strum the sheffield. If the marybeth does not chase the albrecht and the marybeth does not like the sheffield then the marybeth does not chase the sheffield. The albrecht does not eat the albrecht.", "logic": "\nSilhouette(albrecht, marybeth)\nDeparted(sheffield)\nStrum(marybeth, sheffield)\nSilhouette(sheffield, albrecht) -> Bide(albrecht, marybeth)\nforall x (Departed(x) -> Silhouette(x, albrecht))\nforall x (Undomestic(x) and Insecure(x) -> Bide(x, marybeth))\nforall x (Bide(x, marybeth) -> Strum(marybeth, albrecht))\nforall x (Departed(x) and Insecure(x) -> Strum(x, albrecht))\nDeparted(sheffield) and not Silhouette(marybeth, sheffield) -> not Bide(sheffield, albrecht)\nforall x (Strum(x, albrecht) -> Strum(albrecht, sheffield))\nnot Strum(marybeth, albrecht) and not Bide(marybeth, sheffield) -> not Strum(marybeth, sheffield)\n\nnot Silhouette(albrecht, albrecht)\n\nforall x (Departed(x) -> Silhouette(x, albrecht)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The mattias observe the ursula. The trevar is topped. The ursula aluminize the trevar. If the trevar observe the mattias then the mattias tweedle the ursula. If something is topped then it observe the mattias. If something is neurologic and droopy then it tweedle the ursula. If something tweedle the ursula then the ursula aluminize the mattias. If something is topped and droopy then it aluminize the mattias. If the trevar is topped and the ursula does not eat the trevar then the trevar does not like the mattias. If something aluminize the mattias then the mattias aluminize the trevar. If the ursula does not chase the mattias and the ursula does not like the trevar then the ursula does not chase the trevar. The trevar aluminize the mattias.", "logic": "\nObserve(mattias, ursula)\nTopped(trevar)\nAluminize(ursula, trevar)\nObserve(trevar, mattias) -> Tweedle(mattias, ursula)\nforall x (Topped(x) -> Observe(x, mattias))\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Droopy(x) -> Tweedle(x, ursula))\nforall x (Tweedle(x, ursula) -> Aluminize(ursula, mattias))\nforall x (Topped(x) and Droopy(x) -> Aluminize(x, mattias))\nTopped(trevar) and not Observe(ursula, trevar) -> not Tweedle(trevar, mattias)\nforall x (Aluminize(x, mattias) -> Aluminize(mattias, trevar))\nnot Aluminize(ursula, mattias) and not Tweedle(ursula, trevar) -> not Aluminize(ursula, trevar)\n\nAluminize(trevar, mattias)\n\nforall x (Topped(x) and Droopy(x) -> Aluminize(x, mattias)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The jervis whisk the nevin. The heinz is tricuspid. The nevin carburise the heinz. If the heinz whisk the jervis then the jervis patch the nevin. If something is tricuspid then it whisk the jervis. If something is sanitary and burned then it patch the nevin. If something patch the nevin then the nevin carburise the jervis. If something is tricuspid and burned then it carburise the jervis. If the heinz is tricuspid and the nevin does not eat the heinz then the heinz does not like the jervis. If something carburise the jervis then the jervis carburise the heinz. If the nevin does not chase the jervis and the nevin does not like the heinz then the nevin does not chase the heinz. The heinz does not chase the heinz.", "logic": "\nWhisk(jervis, nevin)\nTricuspid(heinz)\nCarburise(nevin, heinz)\nWhisk(heinz, jervis) -> Patch(jervis, nevin)\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) -> Whisk(x, jervis))\nforall x (Sanitary(x) and Burned(x) -> Patch(x, nevin))\nforall x (Patch(x, nevin) -> Carburise(nevin, jervis))\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) and Burned(x) -> Carburise(x, jervis))\nTricuspid(heinz) and not Whisk(nevin, heinz) -> not Patch(heinz, jervis)\nforall x (Carburise(x, jervis) -> Carburise(jervis, heinz))\nnot Carburise(nevin, jervis) and not Patch(nevin, heinz) -> not Carburise(nevin, heinz)\n\nnot Carburise(heinz, heinz)\n\nnot Carburise(heinz, heinz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The cecilla basify the dulci. The bertha is untasted. The dulci isomerise the bertha. If the bertha basify the cecilla then the cecilla semaphore the dulci. If something is untasted then it basify the cecilla. If something is bedridden and unmeasured then it semaphore the dulci. If something semaphore the dulci then the dulci isomerise the cecilla. If something is untasted and unmeasured then it isomerise the cecilla. If the bertha is untasted and the dulci does not eat the bertha then the bertha does not like the cecilla. If something isomerise the cecilla then the cecilla isomerise the bertha. If the dulci does not chase the cecilla and the dulci does not like the bertha then the dulci does not chase the bertha. The cecilla is bedridden.", "logic": "\nBasify(cecilla, dulci)\nUntasted(bertha)\nIsomerise(dulci, bertha)\nBasify(bertha, cecilla) -> Semaphore(cecilla, dulci)\nforall x (Untasted(x) -> Basify(x, cecilla))\nforall x (Bedridden(x) and Unmeasured(x) -> Semaphore(x, dulci))\nforall x (Semaphore(x, dulci) -> Isomerise(dulci, cecilla))\nforall x (Untasted(x) and Unmeasured(x) -> Isomerise(x, cecilla))\nUntasted(bertha) and not Basify(dulci, bertha) -> not Semaphore(bertha, cecilla)\nforall x (Isomerise(x, cecilla) -> Isomerise(cecilla, bertha))\nnot Isomerise(dulci, cecilla) and not Semaphore(dulci, bertha) -> not Isomerise(dulci, bertha)\n\nBedridden(cecilla)\n\nBedridden(cecilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The redmond slant the ann. The mack is descending. The ann chalk the mack. If the mack slant the redmond then the redmond tussle the ann. If something is descending then it slant the redmond. If something is biogenic and anguished then it tussle the ann. If something tussle the ann then the ann chalk the redmond. If something is descending and anguished then it chalk the redmond. If the mack is descending and the ann does not eat the mack then the mack does not like the redmond. If something chalk the redmond then the redmond chalk the mack. If the ann does not chase the redmond and the ann does not like the mack then the ann does not chase the mack. The redmond is not kind.", "logic": "\nSlant(redmond, ann)\nDescending(mack)\nChalk(ann, mack)\nSlant(mack, redmond) -> Tussle(redmond, ann)\nforall x (Descending(x) -> Slant(x, redmond))\nforall x (Biogenic(x) and Anguished(x) -> Tussle(x, ann))\nforall x (Tussle(x, ann) -> Chalk(ann, redmond))\nforall x (Descending(x) and Anguished(x) -> Chalk(x, redmond))\nDescending(mack) and not Slant(ann, mack) -> not Tussle(mack, redmond)\nforall x (Chalk(x, redmond) -> Chalk(redmond, mack))\nnot Chalk(ann, redmond) and not Tussle(ann, mack) -> not Chalk(ann, mack)\n\nnot Kind(redmond)\n\nnot Kind(redmond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The saba bisect the sorcha. The walden is pilose. The sorcha smutch the walden. If the walden bisect the saba then the saba disappear the sorcha. If something is pilose then it bisect the saba. If something is lossless and unmown then it disappear the sorcha. If something disappear the sorcha then the sorcha smutch the saba. If something is pilose and unmown then it smutch the saba. If the walden is pilose and the sorcha does not eat the walden then the walden does not like the saba. If something smutch the saba then the saba smutch the walden. If the sorcha does not chase the saba and the sorcha does not like the walden then the sorcha does not chase the walden. The walden smutch the sorcha.", "logic": "\nBisect(saba, sorcha)\nPilose(walden)\nSmutch(sorcha, walden)\nBisect(walden, saba) -> Disappear(saba, sorcha)\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Bisect(x, saba))\nforall x (Lossless(x) and Unmown(x) -> Disappear(x, sorcha))\nforall x (Disappear(x, sorcha) -> Smutch(sorcha, saba))\nforall x (Pilose(x) and Unmown(x) -> Smutch(x, saba))\nPilose(walden) and not Bisect(sorcha, walden) -> not Disappear(walden, saba)\nforall x (Smutch(x, saba) -> Smutch(saba, walden))\nnot Smutch(sorcha, saba) and not Disappear(sorcha, walden) -> not Smutch(sorcha, walden)\n\nSmutch(walden, sorcha)\n\nSmutch(walden, sorcha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The tess is appeasable. The kessia is not subocean. The giovanne is subocean. The udall winterise the kessia. The udall sightsee the tess. The udall skin the tess. The udall skin the giovanne. If someone winterise the tess then the tess sightsee the kessia. If the kessia skin the udall then the kessia is dentate. If someone is subocean and they visit the udall then the udall skin the giovanne. If someone winterise the kessia then the kessia skin the udall. If someone sightsee the tess and the tess is appeasable then they visit the giovanne. If someone is dentate then they visit the giovanne. If someone sightsee the kessia and they chase the tess then the kessia does not visit the giovanne. If someone sightsee the kessia then the kessia is cogitative. The udall winterise the kessia.", "logic": "\nAppeasable(tess)\nnot Subocean(kessia)\nSubocean(giovanne)\nWinterise(udall, kessia)\nSightsee(udall, tess)\nSkin(udall, tess)\nSkin(udall, giovanne)\nforall x (Winterise(x, tess) -> Sightsee(tess, kessia))\nSkin(kessia, udall) -> Dentate(kessia)\nforall x (Subocean(x) and Skin(x, udall) -> Skin(udall, giovanne))\nforall x (Winterise(x, kessia) -> Skin(kessia, udall))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, tess) and Appeasable(tess) -> Skin(x, giovanne))\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> Skin(x, giovanne))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, kessia) and Winterise(x, tess) -> not Skin(kessia, giovanne))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, kessia) -> Cogitative(kessia))\n\nWinterise(udall, kessia)\n\ntherefore Winterise(udall, kessia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The eudora is justified. The kirk is not rollicking. The arther is rollicking. The ava humbug the kirk. The ava undercut the eudora. The ava correspond the eudora. The ava correspond the arther. If someone humbug the eudora then the eudora undercut the kirk. If the kirk correspond the ava then the kirk is unplumbed. If someone is rollicking and they visit the ava then the ava correspond the arther. If someone humbug the kirk then the kirk correspond the ava. If someone undercut the eudora and the eudora is justified then they visit the arther. If someone is unplumbed then they visit the arther. If someone undercut the kirk and they chase the eudora then the kirk does not visit the arther. If someone undercut the kirk then the kirk is wary. The ava does not visit the arther.", "logic": "\nJustified(eudora)\nnot Rollicking(kirk)\nRollicking(arther)\nHumbug(ava, kirk)\nUndercut(ava, eudora)\nCorrespond(ava, eudora)\nCorrespond(ava, arther)\nforall x (Humbug(x, eudora) -> Undercut(eudora, kirk))\nCorrespond(kirk, ava) -> Unplumbed(kirk)\nforall x (Rollicking(x) and Correspond(x, ava) -> Correspond(ava, arther))\nforall x (Humbug(x, kirk) -> Correspond(kirk, ava))\nforall x (Undercut(x, eudora) and Justified(eudora) -> Correspond(x, arther))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) -> Correspond(x, arther))\nforall x (Undercut(x, kirk) and Humbug(x, eudora) -> not Correspond(kirk, arther))\nforall x (Undercut(x, kirk) -> Wary(kirk))\n\nnot Correspond(ava, arther)\n\ntherefore Correspond(ava, arther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The tessa is supersonic. The lynelle is not hardcore. The lars is hardcore. The maud entail the lynelle. The maud avoid the tessa. The maud unsettle the tessa. The maud unsettle the lars. If someone entail the tessa then the tessa avoid the lynelle. If the lynelle unsettle the maud then the lynelle is scurrying. If someone is hardcore and they visit the maud then the maud unsettle the lars. If someone entail the lynelle then the lynelle unsettle the maud. If someone avoid the tessa and the tessa is supersonic then they visit the lars. If someone is scurrying then they visit the lars. If someone avoid the lynelle and they chase the tessa then the lynelle does not visit the lars. If someone avoid the lynelle then the lynelle is entitled. The lynelle unsettle the maud.", "logic": "\nSupersonic(tessa)\nnot Hardcore(lynelle)\nHardcore(lars)\nEntail(maud, lynelle)\nAvoid(maud, tessa)\nUnsettle(maud, tessa)\nUnsettle(maud, lars)\nforall x (Entail(x, tessa) -> Avoid(tessa, lynelle))\nUnsettle(lynelle, maud) -> Scurrying(lynelle)\nforall x (Hardcore(x) and Unsettle(x, maud) -> Unsettle(maud, lars))\nforall x (Entail(x, lynelle) -> Unsettle(lynelle, maud))\nforall x (Avoid(x, tessa) and Supersonic(tessa) -> Unsettle(x, lars))\nforall x (Scurrying(x) -> Unsettle(x, lars))\nforall x (Avoid(x, lynelle) and Entail(x, tessa) -> not Unsettle(lynelle, lars))\nforall x (Avoid(x, lynelle) -> Entitled(lynelle))\n\nUnsettle(lynelle, maud)\n\nEntail(maud, lynelle) and forall x (Entail(x, lynelle) -> Unsettle(lynelle, maud)) -> therefore Unsettle(lynelle, maud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The adelice is unimagined. The alfreda is not obese. The giovanni is obese. The willie shoplift the alfreda. The willie hitch the adelice. The willie slacken the adelice. The willie slacken the giovanni. If someone shoplift the adelice then the adelice hitch the alfreda. If the alfreda slacken the willie then the alfreda is cervine. If someone is obese and they visit the willie then the willie slacken the giovanni. If someone shoplift the alfreda then the alfreda slacken the willie. If someone hitch the adelice and the adelice is unimagined then they visit the giovanni. If someone is cervine then they visit the giovanni. If someone hitch the alfreda and they chase the adelice then the alfreda does not visit the giovanni. If someone hitch the alfreda then the alfreda is phoenician. The alfreda does not visit the willie.", "logic": "\nUnimagined(adelice)\nnot Obese(alfreda)\nObese(giovanni)\nShoplift(willie, alfreda)\nHitch(willie, adelice)\nSlacken(willie, adelice)\nSlacken(willie, giovanni)\nforall x (Shoplift(x, adelice) -> Hitch(adelice, alfreda))\nSlacken(alfreda, willie) -> Cervine(alfreda)\nforall x (Obese(x) and Slacken(x, willie) -> Slacken(willie, giovanni))\nforall x (Shoplift(x, alfreda) -> Slacken(alfreda, willie))\nforall x (Hitch(x, adelice) and Unimagined(adelice) -> Slacken(x, giovanni))\nforall x (Cervine(x) -> Slacken(x, giovanni))\nforall x (Hitch(x, alfreda) and Shoplift(x, adelice) -> not Slacken(alfreda, giovanni))\nforall x (Hitch(x, alfreda) -> Phoenician(alfreda))\n\nnot Slacken(alfreda, willie)\n\nShoplift(willie, alfreda) and forall x (Shoplift(x, alfreda) -> Slacken(alfreda, willie)) -> therefore Slacken(alfreda, willie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The torrie is absurd. The pieter is not sparkling. The nari is sparkling. The minni accost the pieter. The minni grow the torrie. The minni corset the torrie. The minni corset the nari. If someone accost the torrie then the torrie grow the pieter. If the pieter corset the minni then the pieter is slurred. If someone is sparkling and they visit the minni then the minni corset the nari. If someone accost the pieter then the pieter corset the minni. If someone grow the torrie and the torrie is absurd then they visit the nari. If someone is slurred then they visit the nari. If someone grow the pieter and they chase the torrie then the pieter does not visit the nari. If someone grow the pieter then the pieter is maltreated. The pieter is slurred.", "logic": "\nAbsurd(torrie)\nnot Sparkling(pieter)\nSparkling(nari)\nAccost(minni, pieter)\nGrow(minni, torrie)\nCorset(minni, torrie)\nCorset(minni, nari)\nforall x (Accost(x, torrie) -> Grow(torrie, pieter))\nCorset(pieter, minni) -> Slurred(pieter)\nforall x (Sparkling(x) and Corset(x, minni) -> Corset(minni, nari))\nforall x (Accost(x, pieter) -> Corset(pieter, minni))\nforall x (Grow(x, torrie) and Absurd(torrie) -> Corset(x, nari))\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Corset(x, nari))\nforall x (Grow(x, pieter) and Accost(x, torrie) -> not Corset(pieter, nari))\nforall x (Grow(x, pieter) -> Maltreated(pieter))\n\nSlurred(pieter)\n\nAccost(minni, pieter) and forall x (Accost(x, pieter) -> Corset(pieter, minni)) -> therefore Corset(pieter, minni) Corset(pieter, minni) and Corset(pieter, minni) -> Slurred(pieter) -> therefore Slurred(pieter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The sherlocke is pedal. The orella is not semite. The andrej is semite. The nicola vilify the orella. The nicola guard the sherlocke. The nicola fete the sherlocke. The nicola fete the andrej. If someone vilify the sherlocke then the sherlocke guard the orella. If the orella fete the nicola then the orella is blooming. If someone is semite and they visit the nicola then the nicola fete the andrej. If someone vilify the orella then the orella fete the nicola. If someone guard the sherlocke and the sherlocke is pedal then they visit the andrej. If someone is blooming then they visit the andrej. If someone guard the orella and they chase the sherlocke then the orella does not visit the andrej. If someone guard the orella then the orella is unfinished. The orella is not blooming.", "logic": "\nPedal(sherlocke)\nnot Semite(orella)\nSemite(andrej)\nVilify(nicola, orella)\nGuard(nicola, sherlocke)\nFete(nicola, sherlocke)\nFete(nicola, andrej)\nforall x (Vilify(x, sherlocke) -> Guard(sherlocke, orella))\nFete(orella, nicola) -> Blooming(orella)\nforall x (Semite(x) and Fete(x, nicola) -> Fete(nicola, andrej))\nforall x (Vilify(x, orella) -> Fete(orella, nicola))\nforall x (Guard(x, sherlocke) and Pedal(sherlocke) -> Fete(x, andrej))\nforall x (Blooming(x) -> Fete(x, andrej))\nforall x (Guard(x, orella) and Vilify(x, sherlocke) -> not Fete(orella, andrej))\nforall x (Guard(x, orella) -> Unfinished(orella))\n\nnot Blooming(orella)\n\nVilify(nicola, orella) and forall x (Vilify(x, orella) -> Fete(orella, nicola)) -> therefore Fete(orella, nicola) Fete(orella, nicola) and Fete(orella, nicola) -> Blooming(orella) -> therefore Blooming(orella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The meade is princely. The shelbi is not immiscible. The krissy is immiscible. The hendrick invaginate the shelbi. The hendrick align the meade. The hendrick convulse the meade. The hendrick convulse the krissy. If someone invaginate the meade then the meade align the shelbi. If the shelbi convulse the hendrick then the shelbi is goodly. If someone is immiscible and they visit the hendrick then the hendrick convulse the krissy. If someone invaginate the shelbi then the shelbi convulse the hendrick. If someone align the meade and the meade is princely then they visit the krissy. If someone is goodly then they visit the krissy. If someone align the shelbi and they chase the meade then the shelbi does not visit the krissy. If someone align the shelbi then the shelbi is schmalzy. The shelbi convulse the krissy.", "logic": "\nPrincely(meade)\nnot Immiscible(shelbi)\nImmiscible(krissy)\nInvaginate(hendrick, shelbi)\nAlign(hendrick, meade)\nConvulse(hendrick, meade)\nConvulse(hendrick, krissy)\nforall x (Invaginate(x, meade) -> Align(meade, shelbi))\nConvulse(shelbi, hendrick) -> Goodly(shelbi)\nforall x (Immiscible(x) and Convulse(x, hendrick) -> Convulse(hendrick, krissy))\nforall x (Invaginate(x, shelbi) -> Convulse(shelbi, hendrick))\nforall x (Align(x, meade) and Princely(meade) -> Convulse(x, krissy))\nforall x (Goodly(x) -> Convulse(x, krissy))\nforall x (Align(x, shelbi) and Invaginate(x, meade) -> not Convulse(shelbi, krissy))\nforall x (Align(x, shelbi) -> Schmalzy(shelbi))\n\nConvulse(shelbi, krissy)\n\nInvaginate(hendrick, shelbi) and forall x (Invaginate(x, shelbi) -> Convulse(shelbi, hendrick)) -> therefore Convulse(shelbi, hendrick) Convulse(shelbi, hendrick) and Convulse(shelbi, hendrick) -> Goodly(shelbi) -> therefore Goodly(shelbi) Goodly(shelbi) and forall x (Goodly(x) -> Convulse(x, krissy)) -> therefore Convulse(shelbi, krissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The stafani is imitative. The robb is not sparing. The nev is sparing. The thain binge the robb. The thain palatalize the stafani. The thain overmaster the stafani. The thain overmaster the nev. If someone binge the stafani then the stafani palatalize the robb. If the robb overmaster the thain then the robb is unwary. If someone is sparing and they visit the thain then the thain overmaster the nev. If someone binge the robb then the robb overmaster the thain. If someone palatalize the stafani and the stafani is imitative then they visit the nev. If someone is unwary then they visit the nev. If someone palatalize the robb and they chase the stafani then the robb does not visit the nev. If someone palatalize the robb then the robb is shavian. The robb does not visit the nev.", "logic": "\nImitative(stafani)\nnot Sparing(robb)\nSparing(nev)\nBinge(thain, robb)\nPalatalize(thain, stafani)\nOvermaster(thain, stafani)\nOvermaster(thain, nev)\nforall x (Binge(x, stafani) -> Palatalize(stafani, robb))\nOvermaster(robb, thain) -> Unwary(robb)\nforall x (Sparing(x) and Overmaster(x, thain) -> Overmaster(thain, nev))\nforall x (Binge(x, robb) -> Overmaster(robb, thain))\nforall x (Palatalize(x, stafani) and Imitative(stafani) -> Overmaster(x, nev))\nforall x (Unwary(x) -> Overmaster(x, nev))\nforall x (Palatalize(x, robb) and Binge(x, stafani) -> not Overmaster(robb, nev))\nforall x (Palatalize(x, robb) -> Shavian(robb))\n\nnot Overmaster(robb, nev)\n\nBinge(thain, robb) and forall x (Binge(x, robb) -> Overmaster(robb, thain)) -> therefore Overmaster(robb, thain) Overmaster(robb, thain) and Overmaster(robb, thain) -> Unwary(robb) -> therefore Unwary(robb) Unwary(robb) and forall x (Unwary(x) -> Overmaster(x, nev)) -> therefore Overmaster(robb, nev)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The wells is thirteenth. The carma is not tyrannous. The ingelbert is tyrannous. The myrle smite the carma. The myrle canopy the wells. The myrle kibbitz the wells. The myrle kibbitz the ingelbert. If someone smite the wells then the wells canopy the carma. If the carma kibbitz the myrle then the carma is stalked. If someone is tyrannous and they visit the myrle then the myrle kibbitz the ingelbert. If someone smite the carma then the carma kibbitz the myrle. If someone canopy the wells and the wells is thirteenth then they visit the ingelbert. If someone is stalked then they visit the ingelbert. If someone canopy the carma and they chase the wells then the carma does not visit the ingelbert. If someone canopy the carma then the carma is precatory. The wells does not like the carma.", "logic": "\nThirteenth(wells)\nnot Tyrannous(carma)\nTyrannous(ingelbert)\nSmite(myrle, carma)\nCanopy(myrle, wells)\nKibbitz(myrle, wells)\nKibbitz(myrle, ingelbert)\nforall x (Smite(x, wells) -> Canopy(wells, carma))\nKibbitz(carma, myrle) -> Stalked(carma)\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) and Kibbitz(x, myrle) -> Kibbitz(myrle, ingelbert))\nforall x (Smite(x, carma) -> Kibbitz(carma, myrle))\nforall x (Canopy(x, wells) and Thirteenth(wells) -> Kibbitz(x, ingelbert))\nforall x (Stalked(x) -> Kibbitz(x, ingelbert))\nforall x (Canopy(x, carma) and Smite(x, wells) -> not Kibbitz(carma, ingelbert))\nforall x (Canopy(x, carma) -> Precatory(carma))\n\nnot Canopy(wells, carma)\n\nforall x (Smite(x, wells) -> Canopy(wells, carma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The parke is paralyzed. The winonah is not fuzzed. The douglas is fuzzed. The katharina shun the winonah. The katharina calculate the parke. The katharina benefit the parke. The katharina benefit the douglas. If someone shun the parke then the parke calculate the winonah. If the winonah benefit the katharina then the winonah is hottish. If someone is fuzzed and they visit the katharina then the katharina benefit the douglas. If someone shun the winonah then the winonah benefit the katharina. If someone calculate the parke and the parke is paralyzed then they visit the douglas. If someone is hottish then they visit the douglas. If someone calculate the winonah and they chase the parke then the winonah does not visit the douglas. If someone calculate the winonah then the winonah is aware. The winonah is aware.", "logic": "\nParalyzed(parke)\nnot Fuzzed(winonah)\nFuzzed(douglas)\nShun(katharina, winonah)\nCalculate(katharina, parke)\nBenefit(katharina, parke)\nBenefit(katharina, douglas)\nforall x (Shun(x, parke) -> Calculate(parke, winonah))\nBenefit(winonah, katharina) -> Hottish(winonah)\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Benefit(x, katharina) -> Benefit(katharina, douglas))\nforall x (Shun(x, winonah) -> Benefit(winonah, katharina))\nforall x (Calculate(x, parke) and Paralyzed(parke) -> Benefit(x, douglas))\nforall x (Hottish(x) -> Benefit(x, douglas))\nforall x (Calculate(x, winonah) and Shun(x, parke) -> not Benefit(winonah, douglas))\nforall x (Calculate(x, winonah) -> Aware(winonah))\n\nAware(winonah)\n\nforall x (Calculate(x, winonah) -> Aware(winonah)) <- forall x (Shun(x, parke) -> Calculate(parke, winonah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The aida is gilled. The beckie is not vindicated. The rebecca is vindicated. The cyril exult the beckie. The cyril gloat the aida. The cyril perspire the aida. The cyril perspire the rebecca. If someone exult the aida then the aida gloat the beckie. If the beckie perspire the cyril then the beckie is pricy. If someone is vindicated and they visit the cyril then the cyril perspire the rebecca. If someone exult the beckie then the beckie perspire the cyril. If someone gloat the aida and the aida is gilled then they visit the rebecca. If someone is pricy then they visit the rebecca. If someone gloat the beckie and they chase the aida then the beckie does not visit the rebecca. If someone gloat the beckie then the beckie is exogenic. The aida does not visit the rebecca.", "logic": "\nGilled(aida)\nnot Vindicated(beckie)\nVindicated(rebecca)\nExult(cyril, beckie)\nGloat(cyril, aida)\nPerspire(cyril, aida)\nPerspire(cyril, rebecca)\nforall x (Exult(x, aida) -> Gloat(aida, beckie))\nPerspire(beckie, cyril) -> Pricy(beckie)\nforall x (Vindicated(x) and Perspire(x, cyril) -> Perspire(cyril, rebecca))\nforall x (Exult(x, beckie) -> Perspire(beckie, cyril))\nforall x (Gloat(x, aida) and Gilled(aida) -> Perspire(x, rebecca))\nforall x (Pricy(x) -> Perspire(x, rebecca))\nforall x (Gloat(x, beckie) and Exult(x, aida) -> not Perspire(beckie, rebecca))\nforall x (Gloat(x, beckie) -> Exogenic(beckie))\n\nnot Perspire(aida, rebecca)\n\nforall x (Gloat(x, aida) and Gilled(aida) -> Perspire(x, rebecca)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The elenore is economical. The clinten is not azotemic. The marjie is azotemic. The eliott caterwaul the clinten. The eliott revoke the elenore. The eliott champion the elenore. The eliott champion the marjie. If someone caterwaul the elenore then the elenore revoke the clinten. If the clinten champion the eliott then the clinten is nonionized. If someone is azotemic and they visit the eliott then the eliott champion the marjie. If someone caterwaul the clinten then the clinten champion the eliott. If someone revoke the elenore and the elenore is economical then they visit the marjie. If someone is nonionized then they visit the marjie. If someone revoke the clinten and they chase the elenore then the clinten does not visit the marjie. If someone revoke the clinten then the clinten is humourless. The marjie champion the marjie.", "logic": "\nEconomical(elenore)\nnot Azotemic(clinten)\nAzotemic(marjie)\nCaterwaul(eliott, clinten)\nRevoke(eliott, elenore)\nChampion(eliott, elenore)\nChampion(eliott, marjie)\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, elenore) -> Revoke(elenore, clinten))\nChampion(clinten, eliott) -> Nonionized(clinten)\nforall x (Azotemic(x) and Champion(x, eliott) -> Champion(eliott, marjie))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, clinten) -> Champion(clinten, eliott))\nforall x (Revoke(x, elenore) and Economical(elenore) -> Champion(x, marjie))\nforall x (Nonionized(x) -> Champion(x, marjie))\nforall x (Revoke(x, clinten) and Caterwaul(x, elenore) -> not Champion(clinten, marjie))\nforall x (Revoke(x, clinten) -> Humourless(clinten))\n\nChampion(marjie, marjie)\n\nforall x (Revoke(x, elenore) and Economical(elenore) -> Champion(x, marjie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The carmen is sown. The mendel is not suave. The nonna is suave. The katha fertilise the mendel. The katha impart the carmen. The katha subsist the carmen. The katha subsist the nonna. If someone fertilise the carmen then the carmen impart the mendel. If the mendel subsist the katha then the mendel is unfocused. If someone is suave and they visit the katha then the katha subsist the nonna. If someone fertilise the mendel then the mendel subsist the katha. If someone impart the carmen and the carmen is sown then they visit the nonna. If someone is unfocused then they visit the nonna. If someone impart the mendel and they chase the carmen then the mendel does not visit the nonna. If someone impart the mendel then the mendel is credited. The carmen is not suave.", "logic": "\nSown(carmen)\nnot Suave(mendel)\nSuave(nonna)\nFertilise(katha, mendel)\nImpart(katha, carmen)\nSubsist(katha, carmen)\nSubsist(katha, nonna)\nforall x (Fertilise(x, carmen) -> Impart(carmen, mendel))\nSubsist(mendel, katha) -> Unfocused(mendel)\nforall x (Suave(x) and Subsist(x, katha) -> Subsist(katha, nonna))\nforall x (Fertilise(x, mendel) -> Subsist(mendel, katha))\nforall x (Impart(x, carmen) and Sown(carmen) -> Subsist(x, nonna))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) -> Subsist(x, nonna))\nforall x (Impart(x, mendel) and Fertilise(x, carmen) -> not Subsist(mendel, nonna))\nforall x (Impart(x, mendel) -> Credited(mendel))\n\nnot Suave(carmen)\n\nnot Suave(carmen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The fiann is sheepish. The kevina is not regent. The alastair is regent. The kailey essay the kevina. The kailey crescendo the fiann. The kailey misdemean the fiann. The kailey misdemean the alastair. If someone essay the fiann then the fiann crescendo the kevina. If the kevina misdemean the kailey then the kevina is symmetric. If someone is regent and they visit the kailey then the kailey misdemean the alastair. If someone essay the kevina then the kevina misdemean the kailey. If someone crescendo the fiann and the fiann is sheepish then they visit the alastair. If someone is symmetric then they visit the alastair. If someone crescendo the kevina and they chase the fiann then the kevina does not visit the alastair. If someone crescendo the kevina then the kevina is dendroid. The kevina crescendo the fiann.", "logic": "\nSheepish(fiann)\nnot Regent(kevina)\nRegent(alastair)\nEssay(kailey, kevina)\nCrescendo(kailey, fiann)\nMisdemean(kailey, fiann)\nMisdemean(kailey, alastair)\nforall x (Essay(x, fiann) -> Crescendo(fiann, kevina))\nMisdemean(kevina, kailey) -> Symmetric(kevina)\nforall x (Regent(x) and Misdemean(x, kailey) -> Misdemean(kailey, alastair))\nforall x (Essay(x, kevina) -> Misdemean(kevina, kailey))\nforall x (Crescendo(x, fiann) and Sheepish(fiann) -> Misdemean(x, alastair))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Misdemean(x, alastair))\nforall x (Crescendo(x, kevina) and Essay(x, fiann) -> not Misdemean(kevina, alastair))\nforall x (Crescendo(x, kevina) -> Dendroid(kevina))\n\nCrescendo(kevina, fiann)\n\nCrescendo(kevina, fiann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The bernete is woven. The jobina is not endless. The owen is endless. The julietta replenish the jobina. The julietta pelt the bernete. The julietta falsify the bernete. The julietta falsify the owen. If someone replenish the bernete then the bernete pelt the jobina. If the jobina falsify the julietta then the jobina is categorial. If someone is endless and they visit the julietta then the julietta falsify the owen. If someone replenish the jobina then the jobina falsify the julietta. If someone pelt the bernete and the bernete is woven then they visit the owen. If someone is categorial then they visit the owen. If someone pelt the jobina and they chase the bernete then the jobina does not visit the owen. If someone pelt the jobina then the jobina is sibilant. The julietta does not chase the bernete.", "logic": "\nWoven(bernete)\nnot Endless(jobina)\nEndless(owen)\nReplenish(julietta, jobina)\nPelt(julietta, bernete)\nFalsify(julietta, bernete)\nFalsify(julietta, owen)\nforall x (Replenish(x, bernete) -> Pelt(bernete, jobina))\nFalsify(jobina, julietta) -> Categorial(jobina)\nforall x (Endless(x) and Falsify(x, julietta) -> Falsify(julietta, owen))\nforall x (Replenish(x, jobina) -> Falsify(jobina, julietta))\nforall x (Pelt(x, bernete) and Woven(bernete) -> Falsify(x, owen))\nforall x (Categorial(x) -> Falsify(x, owen))\nforall x (Pelt(x, jobina) and Replenish(x, bernete) -> not Falsify(jobina, owen))\nforall x (Pelt(x, jobina) -> Sibilant(jobina))\n\nnot Replenish(julietta, bernete)\n\nnot Replenish(julietta, bernete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The alley is unwitting. The kingsley is not katharobic. The baillie is katharobic. The kathye commandeer the kingsley. The kathye skew the alley. The kathye blob the alley. The kathye blob the baillie. If someone commandeer the alley then the alley skew the kingsley. If the kingsley blob the kathye then the kingsley is forceless. If someone is katharobic and they visit the kathye then the kathye blob the baillie. If someone commandeer the kingsley then the kingsley blob the kathye. If someone skew the alley and the alley is unwitting then they visit the baillie. If someone is forceless then they visit the baillie. If someone skew the kingsley and they chase the alley then the kingsley does not visit the baillie. If someone skew the kingsley then the kingsley is epistemic. The kathye skew the baillie.", "logic": "\nUnwitting(alley)\nnot Katharobic(kingsley)\nKatharobic(baillie)\nCommandeer(kathye, kingsley)\nSkew(kathye, alley)\nBlob(kathye, alley)\nBlob(kathye, baillie)\nforall x (Commandeer(x, alley) -> Skew(alley, kingsley))\nBlob(kingsley, kathye) -> Forceless(kingsley)\nforall x (Katharobic(x) and Blob(x, kathye) -> Blob(kathye, baillie))\nforall x (Commandeer(x, kingsley) -> Blob(kingsley, kathye))\nforall x (Skew(x, alley) and Unwitting(alley) -> Blob(x, baillie))\nforall x (Forceless(x) -> Blob(x, baillie))\nforall x (Skew(x, kingsley) and Commandeer(x, alley) -> not Blob(kingsley, baillie))\nforall x (Skew(x, kingsley) -> Epistemic(kingsley))\n\nSkew(kathye, baillie)\n\nSkew(kathye, baillie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The laurianne euphemize the caesar. The caesar euphemize the laurianne. If something attain the caesar then the caesar is backmost. If something outbalance the laurianne then the laurianne attain the caesar. If something euphemize the laurianne and it outbalance the caesar then it attain the caesar. If something is totalistic then it euphemize the laurianne. If the laurianne attain the caesar then the caesar is anhydrous. If something euphemize the caesar then the caesar outbalance the laurianne. The caesar euphemize the laurianne.", "logic": "\nEuphemize(laurianne, caesar)\nEuphemize(caesar, laurianne)\nforall x (Attain(x, caesar) -> Backmost(caesar))\nforall x (Outbalance(x, laurianne) -> Attain(laurianne, caesar))\nforall x (Euphemize(x, laurianne) and Outbalance(x, caesar) -> Attain(x, caesar))\nforall x (Totalistic(x) -> Euphemize(x, laurianne))\nAttain(laurianne, caesar) -> Anhydrous(caesar)\nforall x (Euphemize(x, caesar) -> Outbalance(caesar, laurianne))\n\nEuphemize(caesar, laurianne)\n\ntherefore Euphemize(caesar, laurianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The daryn bunco the gerard. The gerard bunco the daryn. If something stanch the gerard then the gerard is benignant. If something grind the daryn then the daryn stanch the gerard. If something bunco the daryn and it grind the gerard then it stanch the gerard. If something is elongate then it bunco the daryn. If the daryn stanch the gerard then the gerard is regulation. If something bunco the gerard then the gerard grind the daryn. The daryn does not visit the gerard.", "logic": "\nBunco(daryn, gerard)\nBunco(gerard, daryn)\nforall x (Stanch(x, gerard) -> Benignant(gerard))\nforall x (Grind(x, daryn) -> Stanch(daryn, gerard))\nforall x (Bunco(x, daryn) and Grind(x, gerard) -> Stanch(x, gerard))\nforall x (Elongate(x) -> Bunco(x, daryn))\nStanch(daryn, gerard) -> Regulation(gerard)\nforall x (Bunco(x, gerard) -> Grind(gerard, daryn))\n\nnot Bunco(daryn, gerard)\n\ntherefore Bunco(daryn, gerard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The delphina shock the anallese. The anallese shock the delphina. If something fruit the anallese then the anallese is laminal. If something shimmy the delphina then the delphina fruit the anallese. If something shock the delphina and it shimmy the anallese then it fruit the anallese. If something is abject then it shock the delphina. If the delphina fruit the anallese then the anallese is seventh. If something shock the anallese then the anallese shimmy the delphina. The anallese shimmy the delphina.", "logic": "\nShock(delphina, anallese)\nShock(anallese, delphina)\nforall x (Fruit(x, anallese) -> Laminal(anallese))\nforall x (Shimmy(x, delphina) -> Fruit(delphina, anallese))\nforall x (Shock(x, delphina) and Shimmy(x, anallese) -> Fruit(x, anallese))\nforall x (Abject(x) -> Shock(x, delphina))\nFruit(delphina, anallese) -> Seventh(anallese)\nforall x (Shock(x, anallese) -> Shimmy(anallese, delphina))\n\nShimmy(anallese, delphina)\n\nShock(delphina, anallese) and forall x (Shock(x, anallese) -> Shimmy(anallese, delphina)) -> therefore Shimmy(anallese, delphina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The jeb optimise the penn. The penn optimise the jeb. If something crook the penn then the penn is cashable. If something quack the jeb then the jeb crook the penn. If something optimise the jeb and it quack the penn then it crook the penn. If something is harrowing then it optimise the jeb. If the jeb crook the penn then the penn is grumbling. If something optimise the penn then the penn quack the jeb. The penn does not eat the jeb.", "logic": "\nOptimise(jeb, penn)\nOptimise(penn, jeb)\nforall x (Crook(x, penn) -> Cashable(penn))\nforall x (Quack(x, jeb) -> Crook(jeb, penn))\nforall x (Optimise(x, jeb) and Quack(x, penn) -> Crook(x, penn))\nforall x (Harrowing(x) -> Optimise(x, jeb))\nCrook(jeb, penn) -> Grumbling(penn)\nforall x (Optimise(x, penn) -> Quack(penn, jeb))\n\nnot Quack(penn, jeb)\n\nOptimise(jeb, penn) and forall x (Optimise(x, penn) -> Quack(penn, jeb)) -> therefore Quack(penn, jeb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The tanney hackle the amie. The amie hackle the tanney. If something gore the amie then the amie is canted. If something bend the tanney then the tanney gore the amie. If something hackle the tanney and it bend the amie then it gore the amie. If something is endemic then it hackle the tanney. If the tanney gore the amie then the amie is papery. If something hackle the amie then the amie bend the tanney. The tanney gore the amie.", "logic": "\nHackle(tanney, amie)\nHackle(amie, tanney)\nforall x (Gore(x, amie) -> Canted(amie))\nforall x (Bend(x, tanney) -> Gore(tanney, amie))\nforall x (Hackle(x, tanney) and Bend(x, amie) -> Gore(x, amie))\nforall x (Endemic(x) -> Hackle(x, tanney))\nGore(tanney, amie) -> Papery(amie)\nforall x (Hackle(x, amie) -> Bend(amie, tanney))\n\nGore(tanney, amie)\n\nHackle(tanney, amie) and forall x (Hackle(x, amie) -> Bend(amie, tanney)) -> therefore Bend(amie, tanney) Bend(amie, tanney) and forall x (Bend(x, tanney) -> Gore(tanney, amie)) -> therefore Gore(tanney, amie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The arturo fuel the cyndi. The cyndi fuel the arturo. If something elate the cyndi then the cyndi is cretaceous. If something befoul the arturo then the arturo elate the cyndi. If something fuel the arturo and it befoul the cyndi then it elate the cyndi. If something is bawdy then it fuel the arturo. If the arturo elate the cyndi then the cyndi is cubital. If something fuel the cyndi then the cyndi befoul the arturo. The arturo does not see the cyndi.", "logic": "\nFuel(arturo, cyndi)\nFuel(cyndi, arturo)\nforall x (Elate(x, cyndi) -> Cretaceous(cyndi))\nforall x (Befoul(x, arturo) -> Elate(arturo, cyndi))\nforall x (Fuel(x, arturo) and Befoul(x, cyndi) -> Elate(x, cyndi))\nforall x (Bawdy(x) -> Fuel(x, arturo))\nElate(arturo, cyndi) -> Cubital(cyndi)\nforall x (Fuel(x, cyndi) -> Befoul(cyndi, arturo))\n\nnot Elate(arturo, cyndi)\n\nFuel(arturo, cyndi) and forall x (Fuel(x, cyndi) -> Befoul(cyndi, arturo)) -> therefore Befoul(cyndi, arturo) Befoul(cyndi, arturo) and forall x (Befoul(x, arturo) -> Elate(arturo, cyndi)) -> therefore Elate(arturo, cyndi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The tedi convert the kimmy. The kimmy convert the tedi. If something dragoon the kimmy then the kimmy is tonic. If something iodinate the tedi then the tedi dragoon the kimmy. If something convert the tedi and it iodinate the kimmy then it dragoon the kimmy. If something is ascensive then it convert the tedi. If the tedi dragoon the kimmy then the kimmy is asiatic. If something convert the kimmy then the kimmy iodinate the tedi. The kimmy is tonic.", "logic": "\nConvert(tedi, kimmy)\nConvert(kimmy, tedi)\nforall x (Dragoon(x, kimmy) -> Tonic(kimmy))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, tedi) -> Dragoon(tedi, kimmy))\nforall x (Convert(x, tedi) and Iodinate(x, kimmy) -> Dragoon(x, kimmy))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Convert(x, tedi))\nDragoon(tedi, kimmy) -> Asiatic(kimmy)\nforall x (Convert(x, kimmy) -> Iodinate(kimmy, tedi))\n\nTonic(kimmy)\n\nConvert(tedi, kimmy) and forall x (Convert(x, kimmy) -> Iodinate(kimmy, tedi)) -> therefore Iodinate(kimmy, tedi) Iodinate(kimmy, tedi) and forall x (Iodinate(x, tedi) -> Dragoon(tedi, kimmy)) -> therefore Dragoon(tedi, kimmy) Dragoon(tedi, kimmy) and forall x (Dragoon(x, kimmy) -> Tonic(kimmy)) -> therefore Tonic(kimmy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The byron avenge the leland. The leland avenge the byron. If something outcall the leland then the leland is gleaming. If something refute the byron then the byron outcall the leland. If something avenge the byron and it refute the leland then it outcall the leland. If something is textured then it avenge the byron. If the byron outcall the leland then the leland is gratified. If something avenge the leland then the leland refute the byron. The leland is not gratified.", "logic": "\nAvenge(byron, leland)\nAvenge(leland, byron)\nforall x (Outcall(x, leland) -> Gleaming(leland))\nforall x (Refute(x, byron) -> Outcall(byron, leland))\nforall x (Avenge(x, byron) and Refute(x, leland) -> Outcall(x, leland))\nforall x (Textured(x) -> Avenge(x, byron))\nOutcall(byron, leland) -> Gratified(leland)\nforall x (Avenge(x, leland) -> Refute(leland, byron))\n\nnot Gratified(leland)\n\nAvenge(byron, leland) and forall x (Avenge(x, leland) -> Refute(leland, byron)) -> therefore Refute(leland, byron) Refute(leland, byron) and forall x (Refute(x, byron) -> Outcall(byron, leland)) -> therefore Outcall(byron, leland) Outcall(byron, leland) and Outcall(byron, leland) -> Gratified(leland) -> therefore Gratified(leland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The julietta jibe the marlane. The marlane jibe the julietta. If something flummox the marlane then the marlane is ergotropic. If something cage the julietta then the julietta flummox the marlane. If something jibe the julietta and it cage the marlane then it flummox the marlane. If something is oddish then it jibe the julietta. If the julietta flummox the marlane then the marlane is abstruse. If something jibe the marlane then the marlane cage the julietta. The marlane does not see the marlane.", "logic": "\nJibe(julietta, marlane)\nJibe(marlane, julietta)\nforall x (Flummox(x, marlane) -> Ergotropic(marlane))\nforall x (Cage(x, julietta) -> Flummox(julietta, marlane))\nforall x (Jibe(x, julietta) and Cage(x, marlane) -> Flummox(x, marlane))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Jibe(x, julietta))\nFlummox(julietta, marlane) -> Abstruse(marlane)\nforall x (Jibe(x, marlane) -> Cage(marlane, julietta))\n\nnot Flummox(marlane, marlane)\n\nforall x (Jibe(x, julietta) and Cage(x, marlane) -> Flummox(x, marlane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The carolina upholster the heinz. The heinz upholster the carolina. If something masquerade the heinz then the heinz is breakneck. If something prompt the carolina then the carolina masquerade the heinz. If something upholster the carolina and it prompt the heinz then it masquerade the heinz. If something is fluky then it upholster the carolina. If the carolina masquerade the heinz then the heinz is cellulosid. If something upholster the heinz then the heinz prompt the carolina. The carolina upholster the carolina.", "logic": "\nUpholster(carolina, heinz)\nUpholster(heinz, carolina)\nforall x (Masquerade(x, heinz) -> Breakneck(heinz))\nforall x (Prompt(x, carolina) -> Masquerade(carolina, heinz))\nforall x (Upholster(x, carolina) and Prompt(x, heinz) -> Masquerade(x, heinz))\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Upholster(x, carolina))\nMasquerade(carolina, heinz) -> Cellulosid(heinz)\nforall x (Upholster(x, heinz) -> Prompt(heinz, carolina))\n\nUpholster(carolina, carolina)\n\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Upholster(x, carolina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The estele amend the maryjo. The maryjo amend the estele. If something yelp the maryjo then the maryjo is scented. If something meld the estele then the estele yelp the maryjo. If something amend the estele and it meld the maryjo then it yelp the maryjo. If something is restrained then it amend the estele. If the estele yelp the maryjo then the maryjo is untrodden. If something amend the maryjo then the maryjo meld the estele. The estele does not see the estele.", "logic": "\nAmend(estele, maryjo)\nAmend(maryjo, estele)\nforall x (Yelp(x, maryjo) -> Scented(maryjo))\nforall x (Meld(x, estele) -> Yelp(estele, maryjo))\nforall x (Amend(x, estele) and Meld(x, maryjo) -> Yelp(x, maryjo))\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Amend(x, estele))\nYelp(estele, maryjo) -> Untrodden(maryjo)\nforall x (Amend(x, maryjo) -> Meld(maryjo, estele))\n\nnot Yelp(estele, estele)\n\nnot Yelp(estele, estele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The tessa bombproof the jere. The jere bombproof the tessa. If something bully the jere then the jere is lightless. If something stray the tessa then the tessa bully the jere. If something bombproof the tessa and it stray the jere then it bully the jere. If something is cousinly then it bombproof the tessa. If the tessa bully the jere then the jere is brushlike. If something bombproof the jere then the jere stray the tessa. The jere stray the jere.", "logic": "\nBombproof(tessa, jere)\nBombproof(jere, tessa)\nforall x (Bully(x, jere) -> Lightless(jere))\nforall x (Stray(x, tessa) -> Bully(tessa, jere))\nforall x (Bombproof(x, tessa) and Stray(x, jere) -> Bully(x, jere))\nforall x (Cousinly(x) -> Bombproof(x, tessa))\nBully(tessa, jere) -> Brushlike(jere)\nforall x (Bombproof(x, jere) -> Stray(jere, tessa))\n\nStray(jere, jere)\n\nStray(jere, jere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The johann verbalise the adoree. The adoree verbalise the johann. If something emboss the adoree then the adoree is naughty. If something mistrust the johann then the johann emboss the adoree. If something verbalise the johann and it mistrust the adoree then it emboss the adoree. If something is follicular then it verbalise the johann. If the johann emboss the adoree then the adoree is crinkled. If something verbalise the adoree then the adoree mistrust the johann. The johann does not eat the adoree.", "logic": "\nVerbalise(johann, adoree)\nVerbalise(adoree, johann)\nforall x (Emboss(x, adoree) -> Naughty(adoree))\nforall x (Mistrust(x, johann) -> Emboss(johann, adoree))\nforall x (Verbalise(x, johann) and Mistrust(x, adoree) -> Emboss(x, adoree))\nforall x (Follicular(x) -> Verbalise(x, johann))\nEmboss(johann, adoree) -> Crinkled(adoree)\nforall x (Verbalise(x, adoree) -> Mistrust(adoree, johann))\n\nnot Mistrust(johann, adoree)\n\nnot Mistrust(johann, adoree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The cyndi founder the friedric. The friedric founder the cyndi. If something correlate the friedric then the friedric is fatigued. If something alcoholize the cyndi then the cyndi correlate the friedric. If something founder the cyndi and it alcoholize the friedric then it correlate the friedric. If something is crabby then it founder the cyndi. If the cyndi correlate the friedric then the friedric is dogmatic. If something founder the friedric then the friedric alcoholize the cyndi. The friedric is crabby.", "logic": "\nFounder(cyndi, friedric)\nFounder(friedric, cyndi)\nforall x (Correlate(x, friedric) -> Fatigued(friedric))\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, cyndi) -> Correlate(cyndi, friedric))\nforall x (Founder(x, cyndi) and Alcoholize(x, friedric) -> Correlate(x, friedric))\nforall x (Crabby(x) -> Founder(x, cyndi))\nCorrelate(cyndi, friedric) -> Dogmatic(friedric)\nforall x (Founder(x, friedric) -> Alcoholize(friedric, cyndi))\n\nCrabby(friedric)\n\nCrabby(friedric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The dorine reflect the lemmie. The lemmie reflect the dorine. If something roil the lemmie then the lemmie is communist. If something require the dorine then the dorine roil the lemmie. If something reflect the dorine and it require the lemmie then it roil the lemmie. If something is sinful then it reflect the dorine. If the dorine roil the lemmie then the lemmie is scratchy. If something reflect the lemmie then the lemmie require the dorine. The dorine is not communist.", "logic": "\nReflect(dorine, lemmie)\nReflect(lemmie, dorine)\nforall x (Roil(x, lemmie) -> Communist(lemmie))\nforall x (Require(x, dorine) -> Roil(dorine, lemmie))\nforall x (Reflect(x, dorine) and Require(x, lemmie) -> Roil(x, lemmie))\nforall x (Sinful(x) -> Reflect(x, dorine))\nRoil(dorine, lemmie) -> Scratchy(lemmie)\nforall x (Reflect(x, lemmie) -> Require(lemmie, dorine))\n\nnot Communist(dorine)\n\nnot Communist(dorine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The seana revert the lelah. The lelah revert the seana. If something colonise the lelah then the lelah is risen. If something ship the seana then the seana colonise the lelah. If something revert the seana and it ship the lelah then it colonise the lelah. If something is undeceived then it revert the seana. If the seana colonise the lelah then the lelah is behavioral. If something revert the lelah then the lelah ship the seana. The seana ship the seana.", "logic": "\nRevert(seana, lelah)\nRevert(lelah, seana)\nforall x (Colonise(x, lelah) -> Risen(lelah))\nforall x (Ship(x, seana) -> Colonise(seana, lelah))\nforall x (Revert(x, seana) and Ship(x, lelah) -> Colonise(x, lelah))\nforall x (Undeceived(x) -> Revert(x, seana))\nColonise(seana, lelah) -> Behavioral(lelah)\nforall x (Revert(x, lelah) -> Ship(lelah, seana))\n\nShip(seana, seana)\n\nShip(seana, seana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "Edsel is farming. Edsel is superable. Elisha is placoid. Elisha is calceiform. Donny is farming. Donny is superable. Donny is unpunctual. Donny is calceiform. Lana is farming. Lana is not veiled. Smart things are superable. If Donny is calceiform and Donny is placoid then Donny is mangey. If Edsel is farming and Edsel is superable then Edsel is not veiled. Green things are placoid. If something is calceiform and farming then it is unpunctual. Furry things are not veiled. If something is superable and not unpunctual then it is mangey. If Lana is unpunctual and Lana is mangey then Lana is not placoid. Elisha is calceiform.", "logic": "\nFarming(edsel)\nSuperable(edsel)\nPlacoid(elisha)\nCalceiform(elisha)\nFarming(donny)\nSuperable(donny)\nUnpunctual(donny)\nCalceiform(donny)\nFarming(lana)\nnot Veiled(lana)\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Superable(x))\nCalceiform(donny) and Placoid(donny) -> Mangey(donny)\nFarming(edsel) and Superable(edsel) -> not Veiled(edsel)\nforall x (Farming(x) -> Placoid(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) and Farming(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> not Veiled(x))\nforall x (Superable(x) and not Unpunctual(x) -> Mangey(x))\nUnpunctual(lana) and Mangey(lana) -> not Placoid(lana)\n\nCalceiform(elisha)\n\ntherefore Calceiform(elisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Barton is inharmonic. Barton is knobby. Amandie is newfangled. Amandie is highbrowed. Pascale is inharmonic. Pascale is knobby. Pascale is historied. Pascale is highbrowed. Alton is inharmonic. Alton is not astonied. Smart things are knobby. If Pascale is highbrowed and Pascale is newfangled then Pascale is erring. If Barton is inharmonic and Barton is knobby then Barton is not astonied. Green things are newfangled. If something is highbrowed and inharmonic then it is historied. Furry things are not astonied. If something is knobby and not historied then it is erring. If Alton is historied and Alton is erring then Alton is not newfangled. Pascale is not inharmonic.", "logic": "\nInharmonic(barton)\nKnobby(barton)\nNewfangled(amandie)\nHighbrowed(amandie)\nInharmonic(pascale)\nKnobby(pascale)\nHistoried(pascale)\nHighbrowed(pascale)\nInharmonic(alton)\nnot Astonied(alton)\nforall x (Historied(x) -> Knobby(x))\nHighbrowed(pascale) and Newfangled(pascale) -> Erring(pascale)\nInharmonic(barton) and Knobby(barton) -> not Astonied(barton)\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Newfangled(x))\nforall x (Highbrowed(x) and Inharmonic(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Erring(x) -> not Astonied(x))\nforall x (Knobby(x) and not Historied(x) -> Erring(x))\nHistoried(alton) and Erring(alton) -> not Newfangled(alton)\n\nnot Inharmonic(pascale)\n\ntherefore Inharmonic(pascale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Niki is blunt. Niki is extinct. Hillel is twee. Hillel is backhanded. Mimi is blunt. Mimi is extinct. Mimi is cogent. Mimi is backhanded. Isabelita is blunt. Isabelita is not ponderable. Smart things are extinct. If Mimi is backhanded and Mimi is twee then Mimi is isocyclic. If Niki is blunt and Niki is extinct then Niki is not ponderable. Green things are twee. If something is backhanded and blunt then it is cogent. Furry things are not ponderable. If something is extinct and not cogent then it is isocyclic. If Isabelita is cogent and Isabelita is isocyclic then Isabelita is not twee. Niki is not ponderable.", "logic": "\nBlunt(niki)\nExtinct(niki)\nTwee(hillel)\nBackhanded(hillel)\nBlunt(mimi)\nExtinct(mimi)\nCogent(mimi)\nBackhanded(mimi)\nBlunt(isabelita)\nnot Ponderable(isabelita)\nforall x (Cogent(x) -> Extinct(x))\nBackhanded(mimi) and Twee(mimi) -> Isocyclic(mimi)\nBlunt(niki) and Extinct(niki) -> not Ponderable(niki)\nforall x (Blunt(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Blunt(x) -> Cogent(x))\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) -> not Ponderable(x))\nforall x (Extinct(x) and not Cogent(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\nCogent(isabelita) and Isocyclic(isabelita) -> not Twee(isabelita)\n\nnot Ponderable(niki)\n\nBlunt(niki) and Extinct(niki) and Blunt(niki) and Extinct(niki) -> not Ponderable(niki) -> therefore not Ponderable(niki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Chastity is changed. Chastity is available. Annemarie is viable. Annemarie is leftmost. Nadya is changed. Nadya is available. Nadya is usual. Nadya is leftmost. Carlene is changed. Carlene is not endermic. Smart things are available. If Nadya is leftmost and Nadya is viable then Nadya is hypnoid. If Chastity is changed and Chastity is available then Chastity is not endermic. Green things are viable. If something is leftmost and changed then it is usual. Furry things are not endermic. If something is available and not usual then it is hypnoid. If Carlene is usual and Carlene is hypnoid then Carlene is not viable. Carlene is not viable.", "logic": "\nChanged(chastity)\nAvailable(chastity)\nViable(annemarie)\nLeftmost(annemarie)\nChanged(nadya)\nAvailable(nadya)\nUsual(nadya)\nLeftmost(nadya)\nChanged(carlene)\nnot Endermic(carlene)\nforall x (Usual(x) -> Available(x))\nLeftmost(nadya) and Viable(nadya) -> Hypnoid(nadya)\nChanged(chastity) and Available(chastity) -> not Endermic(chastity)\nforall x (Changed(x) -> Viable(x))\nforall x (Leftmost(x) and Changed(x) -> Usual(x))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) -> not Endermic(x))\nforall x (Available(x) and not Usual(x) -> Hypnoid(x))\nUsual(carlene) and Hypnoid(carlene) -> not Viable(carlene)\n\nnot Viable(carlene)\n\nChanged(carlene) and forall x (Changed(x) -> Viable(x)) -> therefore Viable(carlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Dona is liberal. Dona is addled. Caressa is pretorian. Caressa is hopeful. Venkat is liberal. Venkat is addled. Venkat is beguiled. Venkat is hopeful. Obie is liberal. Obie is not airborne. Smart things are addled. If Venkat is hopeful and Venkat is pretorian then Venkat is heartening. If Dona is liberal and Dona is addled then Dona is not airborne. Green things are pretorian. If something is hopeful and liberal then it is beguiled. Furry things are not airborne. If something is addled and not beguiled then it is heartening. If Obie is beguiled and Obie is heartening then Obie is not pretorian. Venkat is heartening.", "logic": "\nLiberal(dona)\nAddled(dona)\nPretorian(caressa)\nHopeful(caressa)\nLiberal(venkat)\nAddled(venkat)\nBeguiled(venkat)\nHopeful(venkat)\nLiberal(obie)\nnot Airborne(obie)\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> Addled(x))\nHopeful(venkat) and Pretorian(venkat) -> Heartening(venkat)\nLiberal(dona) and Addled(dona) -> not Airborne(dona)\nforall x (Liberal(x) -> Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) and Liberal(x) -> Beguiled(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> not Airborne(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) and not Beguiled(x) -> Heartening(x))\nBeguiled(obie) and Heartening(obie) -> not Pretorian(obie)\n\nHeartening(venkat)\n\nLiberal(venkat) and forall x (Liberal(x) -> Pretorian(x)) -> therefore Pretorian(venkat) Hopeful(venkat) and Pretorian(venkat) and Hopeful(venkat) and Pretorian(venkat) -> Heartening(venkat) -> therefore Heartening(venkat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Thomas is mousey. Thomas is clueless. Rayner is umber. Rayner is unsalted. Daffie is mousey. Daffie is clueless. Daffie is cuspate. Daffie is unsalted. Oona is mousey. Oona is not inchoative. Smart things are clueless. If Daffie is unsalted and Daffie is umber then Daffie is bribable. If Thomas is mousey and Thomas is clueless then Thomas is not inchoative. Green things are umber. If something is unsalted and mousey then it is cuspate. Furry things are not inchoative. If something is clueless and not cuspate then it is bribable. If Oona is cuspate and Oona is bribable then Oona is not umber. Daffie is not bribable.", "logic": "\nMousey(thomas)\nClueless(thomas)\nUmber(rayner)\nUnsalted(rayner)\nMousey(daffie)\nClueless(daffie)\nCuspate(daffie)\nUnsalted(daffie)\nMousey(oona)\nnot Inchoative(oona)\nforall x (Cuspate(x) -> Clueless(x))\nUnsalted(daffie) and Umber(daffie) -> Bribable(daffie)\nMousey(thomas) and Clueless(thomas) -> not Inchoative(thomas)\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Umber(x))\nforall x (Unsalted(x) and Mousey(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Bribable(x) -> not Inchoative(x))\nforall x (Clueless(x) and not Cuspate(x) -> Bribable(x))\nCuspate(oona) and Bribable(oona) -> not Umber(oona)\n\nnot Bribable(daffie)\n\nMousey(daffie) and forall x (Mousey(x) -> Umber(x)) -> therefore Umber(daffie) Unsalted(daffie) and Umber(daffie) and Unsalted(daffie) and Umber(daffie) -> Bribable(daffie) -> therefore Bribable(daffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Feodora is dread. Feodora is conductive. Demetria is privy. Demetria is unbroken. Gabey is dread. Gabey is conductive. Gabey is frivolous. Gabey is unbroken. Sioux is dread. Sioux is not failing. Smart things are conductive. If Gabey is unbroken and Gabey is privy then Gabey is frowzy. If Feodora is dread and Feodora is conductive then Feodora is not failing. Green things are privy. If something is unbroken and dread then it is frivolous. Furry things are not failing. If something is conductive and not frivolous then it is frowzy. If Sioux is frivolous and Sioux is frowzy then Sioux is not privy. Gabey is not failing.", "logic": "\nDread(feodora)\nConductive(feodora)\nPrivy(demetria)\nUnbroken(demetria)\nDread(gabey)\nConductive(gabey)\nFrivolous(gabey)\nUnbroken(gabey)\nDread(sioux)\nnot Failing(sioux)\nforall x (Frivolous(x) -> Conductive(x))\nUnbroken(gabey) and Privy(gabey) -> Frowzy(gabey)\nDread(feodora) and Conductive(feodora) -> not Failing(feodora)\nforall x (Dread(x) -> Privy(x))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) and Dread(x) -> Frivolous(x))\nforall x (Frowzy(x) -> not Failing(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) and not Frivolous(x) -> Frowzy(x))\nFrivolous(sioux) and Frowzy(sioux) -> not Privy(sioux)\n\nnot Failing(gabey)\n\nDread(gabey) and forall x (Dread(x) -> Privy(x)) -> therefore Privy(gabey) Unbroken(gabey) and Privy(gabey) and Unbroken(gabey) and Privy(gabey) -> Frowzy(gabey) -> therefore Frowzy(gabey) Frowzy(gabey) and forall x (Frowzy(x) -> not Failing(x)) -> therefore not Failing(gabey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Hari is crustal. Hari is fawning. Anatollo is palladian. Anatollo is gettable. Maurita is crustal. Maurita is fawning. Maurita is proustian. Maurita is gettable. Mordecai is crustal. Mordecai is not polyphonic. Smart things are fawning. If Maurita is gettable and Maurita is palladian then Maurita is brachiopod. If Hari is crustal and Hari is fawning then Hari is not polyphonic. Green things are palladian. If something is gettable and crustal then it is proustian. Furry things are not polyphonic. If something is fawning and not proustian then it is brachiopod. If Mordecai is proustian and Mordecai is brachiopod then Mordecai is not palladian. Maurita is polyphonic.", "logic": "\nCrustal(hari)\nFawning(hari)\nPalladian(anatollo)\nGettable(anatollo)\nCrustal(maurita)\nFawning(maurita)\nProustian(maurita)\nGettable(maurita)\nCrustal(mordecai)\nnot Polyphonic(mordecai)\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Fawning(x))\nGettable(maurita) and Palladian(maurita) -> Brachiopod(maurita)\nCrustal(hari) and Fawning(hari) -> not Polyphonic(hari)\nforall x (Crustal(x) -> Palladian(x))\nforall x (Gettable(x) and Crustal(x) -> Proustian(x))\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) -> not Polyphonic(x))\nforall x (Fawning(x) and not Proustian(x) -> Brachiopod(x))\nProustian(mordecai) and Brachiopod(mordecai) -> not Palladian(mordecai)\n\nPolyphonic(maurita)\n\nCrustal(maurita) and forall x (Crustal(x) -> Palladian(x)) -> therefore Palladian(maurita) Gettable(maurita) and Palladian(maurita) and Gettable(maurita) and Palladian(maurita) -> Brachiopod(maurita) -> therefore Brachiopod(maurita) Brachiopod(maurita) and forall x (Brachiopod(x) -> not Polyphonic(x)) -> therefore not Polyphonic(maurita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Fifi is oxidative. Fifi is populated. Clea is obvious. Clea is placed. Hyacintha is oxidative. Hyacintha is populated. Hyacintha is masterly. Hyacintha is placed. Lauralee is oxidative. Lauralee is not abranchial. Smart things are populated. If Hyacintha is placed and Hyacintha is obvious then Hyacintha is drunken. If Fifi is oxidative and Fifi is populated then Fifi is not abranchial. Green things are obvious. If something is placed and oxidative then it is masterly. Furry things are not abranchial. If something is populated and not masterly then it is drunken. If Lauralee is masterly and Lauralee is drunken then Lauralee is not obvious. Lauralee is not populated.", "logic": "\nOxidative(fifi)\nPopulated(fifi)\nObvious(clea)\nPlaced(clea)\nOxidative(hyacintha)\nPopulated(hyacintha)\nMasterly(hyacintha)\nPlaced(hyacintha)\nOxidative(lauralee)\nnot Abranchial(lauralee)\nforall x (Masterly(x) -> Populated(x))\nPlaced(hyacintha) and Obvious(hyacintha) -> Drunken(hyacintha)\nOxidative(fifi) and Populated(fifi) -> not Abranchial(fifi)\nforall x (Oxidative(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Placed(x) and Oxidative(x) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Drunken(x) -> not Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Populated(x) and not Masterly(x) -> Drunken(x))\nMasterly(lauralee) and Drunken(lauralee) -> not Obvious(lauralee)\n\nnot Populated(lauralee)\n\nforall x (Masterly(x) -> Populated(x)) <- forall x (Placed(x) and Oxidative(x) -> Masterly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Kayley is alopecic. Kayley is reclusive. Juliana is scraggy. Juliana is unsavory. Ilona is alopecic. Ilona is reclusive. Ilona is benthal. Ilona is unsavory. Wynton is alopecic. Wynton is not plain. Smart things are reclusive. If Ilona is unsavory and Ilona is scraggy then Ilona is bullying. If Kayley is alopecic and Kayley is reclusive then Kayley is not plain. Green things are scraggy. If something is unsavory and alopecic then it is benthal. Furry things are not plain. If something is reclusive and not benthal then it is bullying. If Wynton is benthal and Wynton is bullying then Wynton is not scraggy. Kayley is benthal.", "logic": "\nAlopecic(kayley)\nReclusive(kayley)\nScraggy(juliana)\nUnsavory(juliana)\nAlopecic(ilona)\nReclusive(ilona)\nBenthal(ilona)\nUnsavory(ilona)\nAlopecic(wynton)\nnot Plain(wynton)\nforall x (Benthal(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nUnsavory(ilona) and Scraggy(ilona) -> Bullying(ilona)\nAlopecic(kayley) and Reclusive(kayley) -> not Plain(kayley)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> Scraggy(x))\nforall x (Unsavory(x) and Alopecic(x) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Bullying(x) -> not Plain(x))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) and not Benthal(x) -> Bullying(x))\nBenthal(wynton) and Bullying(wynton) -> not Scraggy(wynton)\n\nBenthal(kayley)\n\nforall x (Unsavory(x) and Alopecic(x) -> Benthal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Eolande is rigorous. Eolande is inhalant. Ranice is magical. Ranice is barbecued. Ricki is rigorous. Ricki is inhalant. Ricki is metacarpal. Ricki is barbecued. Ettie is rigorous. Ettie is not cancerous. Smart things are inhalant. If Ricki is barbecued and Ricki is magical then Ricki is bereft. If Eolande is rigorous and Eolande is inhalant then Eolande is not cancerous. Green things are magical. If something is barbecued and rigorous then it is metacarpal. Furry things are not cancerous. If something is inhalant and not metacarpal then it is bereft. If Ettie is metacarpal and Ettie is bereft then Ettie is not magical. Ranice is not inhalant.", "logic": "\nRigorous(eolande)\nInhalant(eolande)\nMagical(ranice)\nBarbecued(ranice)\nRigorous(ricki)\nInhalant(ricki)\nMetacarpal(ricki)\nBarbecued(ricki)\nRigorous(ettie)\nnot Cancerous(ettie)\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) -> Inhalant(x))\nBarbecued(ricki) and Magical(ricki) -> Bereft(ricki)\nRigorous(eolande) and Inhalant(eolande) -> not Cancerous(eolande)\nforall x (Rigorous(x) -> Magical(x))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) and Rigorous(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Bereft(x) -> not Cancerous(x))\nforall x (Inhalant(x) and not Metacarpal(x) -> Bereft(x))\nMetacarpal(ettie) and Bereft(ettie) -> not Magical(ettie)\n\nnot Inhalant(ranice)\n\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) -> Inhalant(x)) <- forall x (Barbecued(x) and Rigorous(x) -> Metacarpal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Charil is idyllic. Charil is biyearly. Wendy is droopy. Wendy is nordic. Ansell is idyllic. Ansell is biyearly. Ansell is semite. Ansell is nordic. Harlan is idyllic. Harlan is not respective. Smart things are biyearly. If Ansell is nordic and Ansell is droopy then Ansell is bombastic. If Charil is idyllic and Charil is biyearly then Charil is not respective. Green things are droopy. If something is nordic and idyllic then it is semite. Furry things are not respective. If something is biyearly and not semite then it is bombastic. If Harlan is semite and Harlan is bombastic then Harlan is not droopy. Charil is bombastic.", "logic": "\nIdyllic(charil)\nBiyearly(charil)\nDroopy(wendy)\nNordic(wendy)\nIdyllic(ansell)\nBiyearly(ansell)\nSemite(ansell)\nNordic(ansell)\nIdyllic(harlan)\nnot Respective(harlan)\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nNordic(ansell) and Droopy(ansell) -> Bombastic(ansell)\nIdyllic(charil) and Biyearly(charil) -> not Respective(charil)\nforall x (Idyllic(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Nordic(x) and Idyllic(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> not Respective(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) and not Semite(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nSemite(harlan) and Bombastic(harlan) -> not Droopy(harlan)\n\nBombastic(charil)\n\nforall x (Biyearly(x) and not Semite(x) -> Bombastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Raymundo is resistant. Raymundo is vexing. Minny is synchronic. Minny is albinic. Kandy is resistant. Kandy is vexing. Kandy is plump. Kandy is albinic. Kim is resistant. Kim is not touristed. Smart things are vexing. If Kandy is albinic and Kandy is synchronic then Kandy is sweeping. If Raymundo is resistant and Raymundo is vexing then Raymundo is not touristed. Green things are synchronic. If something is albinic and resistant then it is plump. Furry things are not touristed. If something is vexing and not plump then it is sweeping. If Kim is plump and Kim is sweeping then Kim is not synchronic. Kim is not albinic.", "logic": "\nResistant(raymundo)\nVexing(raymundo)\nSynchronic(minny)\nAlbinic(minny)\nResistant(kandy)\nVexing(kandy)\nPlump(kandy)\nAlbinic(kandy)\nResistant(kim)\nnot Touristed(kim)\nforall x (Plump(x) -> Vexing(x))\nAlbinic(kandy) and Synchronic(kandy) -> Sweeping(kandy)\nResistant(raymundo) and Vexing(raymundo) -> not Touristed(raymundo)\nforall x (Resistant(x) -> Synchronic(x))\nforall x (Albinic(x) and Resistant(x) -> Plump(x))\nforall x (Sweeping(x) -> not Touristed(x))\nforall x (Vexing(x) and not Plump(x) -> Sweeping(x))\nPlump(kim) and Sweeping(kim) -> not Synchronic(kim)\n\nnot Albinic(kim)\n\nnot Albinic(kim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Tasha is lamentable. Tasha is nonsexual. Hesther is auspicious. Hesther is impartial. Chanda is lamentable. Chanda is nonsexual. Chanda is lawful. Chanda is impartial. Bernd is lamentable. Bernd is not cherubic. Smart things are nonsexual. If Chanda is impartial and Chanda is auspicious then Chanda is polyphonic. If Tasha is lamentable and Tasha is nonsexual then Tasha is not cherubic. Green things are auspicious. If something is impartial and lamentable then it is lawful. Furry things are not cherubic. If something is nonsexual and not lawful then it is polyphonic. If Bernd is lawful and Bernd is polyphonic then Bernd is not auspicious. Hesther is lamentable.", "logic": "\nLamentable(tasha)\nNonsexual(tasha)\nAuspicious(hesther)\nImpartial(hesther)\nLamentable(chanda)\nNonsexual(chanda)\nLawful(chanda)\nImpartial(chanda)\nLamentable(bernd)\nnot Cherubic(bernd)\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nImpartial(chanda) and Auspicious(chanda) -> Polyphonic(chanda)\nLamentable(tasha) and Nonsexual(tasha) -> not Cherubic(tasha)\nforall x (Lamentable(x) -> Auspicious(x))\nforall x (Impartial(x) and Lamentable(x) -> Lawful(x))\nforall x (Polyphonic(x) -> not Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) and not Lawful(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\nLawful(bernd) and Polyphonic(bernd) -> not Auspicious(bernd)\n\nLamentable(hesther)\n\nLamentable(hesther) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Ronica is seventy. Ronica is xxxiii. Rajeev is undulatory. Rajeev is colored. Dido is seventy. Dido is xxxiii. Dido is ardent. Dido is colored. Rogers is seventy. Rogers is not wily. Smart things are xxxiii. If Dido is colored and Dido is undulatory then Dido is anestrous. If Ronica is seventy and Ronica is xxxiii then Ronica is not wily. Green things are undulatory. If something is colored and seventy then it is ardent. Furry things are not wily. If something is xxxiii and not ardent then it is anestrous. If Rogers is ardent and Rogers is anestrous then Rogers is not undulatory. Rajeev is not wily.", "logic": "\nSeventy(ronica)\nXxxiii(ronica)\nUndulatory(rajeev)\nColored(rajeev)\nSeventy(dido)\nXxxiii(dido)\nArdent(dido)\nColored(dido)\nSeventy(rogers)\nnot Wily(rogers)\nforall x (Ardent(x) -> Xxxiii(x))\nColored(dido) and Undulatory(dido) -> Anestrous(dido)\nSeventy(ronica) and Xxxiii(ronica) -> not Wily(ronica)\nforall x (Seventy(x) -> Undulatory(x))\nforall x (Colored(x) and Seventy(x) -> Ardent(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> not Wily(x))\nforall x (Xxxiii(x) and not Ardent(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nArdent(rogers) and Anestrous(rogers) -> not Undulatory(rogers)\n\nnot Wily(rajeev)\n\nnot Wily(rajeev) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Tamarah is stainless. Tamarah is morphemic. Doloritas is azygous. Doloritas is unwilling. Calla is stainless. Calla is morphemic. Calla is coagulable. Calla is unwilling. Nissa is stainless. Nissa is not large. Smart things are morphemic. If Calla is unwilling and Calla is azygous then Calla is rigid. If Tamarah is stainless and Tamarah is morphemic then Tamarah is not large. Green things are azygous. If something is unwilling and stainless then it is coagulable. Furry things are not large. If something is morphemic and not coagulable then it is rigid. If Nissa is coagulable and Nissa is rigid then Nissa is not azygous. Tamarah is unwilling.", "logic": "\nStainless(tamarah)\nMorphemic(tamarah)\nAzygous(doloritas)\nUnwilling(doloritas)\nStainless(calla)\nMorphemic(calla)\nCoagulable(calla)\nUnwilling(calla)\nStainless(nissa)\nnot Large(nissa)\nforall x (Coagulable(x) -> Morphemic(x))\nUnwilling(calla) and Azygous(calla) -> Rigid(calla)\nStainless(tamarah) and Morphemic(tamarah) -> not Large(tamarah)\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Azygous(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and Stainless(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nforall x (Rigid(x) -> not Large(x))\nforall x (Morphemic(x) and not Coagulable(x) -> Rigid(x))\nCoagulable(nissa) and Rigid(nissa) -> not Azygous(nissa)\n\nUnwilling(tamarah)\n\nUnwilling(tamarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Kyle is incertain. Lyndel is unrouged. Merrick is twisty. Stevie is twisty. If Lyndel is numerable then Lyndel is unrouged. If something is unrouged then it is numerable. All unrouged, twisty things are not numerable. If something is prolate and babylonian then it is unrouged. All numerable, incertain things are unrouged. If something is babylonian and not incertain then it is lengthwise. All numerable things are lengthwise. All lengthwise things are prolate. Stevie is twisty.", "logic": "\nIncertain(kyle)\nUnrouged(lyndel)\nTwisty(merrick)\nTwisty(stevie)\nNumerable(lyndel) -> Unrouged(lyndel)\nforall x (Unrouged(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Unrouged(x) and Twisty(x) -> not Numerable(x))\nforall x (Prolate(x) and Babylonian(x) -> Unrouged(x))\nforall x (Numerable(x) and Incertain(x) -> Unrouged(x))\nforall x (Babylonian(x) and not Incertain(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nforall x (Numerable(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) -> Prolate(x))\n\nTwisty(stevie)\n\ntherefore Twisty(stevie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Sig is mimic. Burta is roughshod. Ilyse is expert. Noah is expert. If Burta is parasitic then Burta is roughshod. If something is roughshod then it is parasitic. All roughshod, expert things are not parasitic. If something is excursive and fiddling then it is roughshod. All parasitic, mimic things are roughshod. If something is fiddling and not mimic then it is unsoluble. All parasitic things are unsoluble. All unsoluble things are excursive. Ilyse is not expert.", "logic": "\nMimic(sig)\nRoughshod(burta)\nExpert(ilyse)\nExpert(noah)\nParasitic(burta) -> Roughshod(burta)\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nforall x (Roughshod(x) and Expert(x) -> not Parasitic(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Fiddling(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Parasitic(x) and Mimic(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Fiddling(x) and not Mimic(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Parasitic(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Unsoluble(x) -> Excursive(x))\n\nnot Expert(ilyse)\n\ntherefore Expert(ilyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Cheston is capacious. Mmarianne is tertian. Erminie is adiabatic. Eleonore is adiabatic. If Mmarianne is treble then Mmarianne is tertian. If something is tertian then it is treble. All tertian, adiabatic things are not treble. If something is semiliquid and certified then it is tertian. All treble, capacious things are tertian. If something is certified and not capacious then it is unproven. All treble things are unproven. All unproven things are semiliquid. Mmarianne is treble.", "logic": "\nCapacious(cheston)\nTertian(mmarianne)\nAdiabatic(erminie)\nAdiabatic(eleonore)\nTreble(mmarianne) -> Tertian(mmarianne)\nforall x (Tertian(x) -> Treble(x))\nforall x (Tertian(x) and Adiabatic(x) -> not Treble(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Certified(x) -> Tertian(x))\nforall x (Treble(x) and Capacious(x) -> Tertian(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) and not Capacious(x) -> Unproven(x))\nforall x (Treble(x) -> Unproven(x))\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\n\nTreble(mmarianne)\n\nTertian(mmarianne) and forall x (Tertian(x) -> Treble(x)) -> therefore Treble(mmarianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Shepherd is despairing. Ella is paperlike. Emil is nocturnal. Roseanne is nocturnal. If Ella is immodest then Ella is paperlike. If something is paperlike then it is immodest. All paperlike, nocturnal things are not immodest. If something is upstairs and romaic then it is paperlike. All immodest, despairing things are paperlike. If something is romaic and not despairing then it is perforated. All immodest things are perforated. All perforated things are upstairs. Ella is not immodest.", "logic": "\nDespairing(shepherd)\nPaperlike(ella)\nNocturnal(emil)\nNocturnal(roseanne)\nImmodest(ella) -> Paperlike(ella)\nforall x (Paperlike(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Paperlike(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> not Immodest(x))\nforall x (Upstairs(x) and Romaic(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Immodest(x) and Despairing(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Romaic(x) and not Despairing(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Perforated(x) -> Upstairs(x))\n\nnot Immodest(ella)\n\nPaperlike(ella) and forall x (Paperlike(x) -> Immodest(x)) -> therefore Immodest(ella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Becka is blowzy. Margarita is lamenting. Jobye is dysgenic. Vinny is dysgenic. If Margarita is milklike then Margarita is lamenting. If something is lamenting then it is milklike. All lamenting, dysgenic things are not milklike. If something is carpetbag and waxy then it is lamenting. All milklike, blowzy things are lamenting. If something is waxy and not blowzy then it is squamulose. All milklike things are squamulose. All squamulose things are carpetbag. Margarita is squamulose.", "logic": "\nBlowzy(becka)\nLamenting(margarita)\nDysgenic(jobye)\nDysgenic(vinny)\nMilklike(margarita) -> Lamenting(margarita)\nforall x (Lamenting(x) -> Milklike(x))\nforall x (Lamenting(x) and Dysgenic(x) -> not Milklike(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) and Waxy(x) -> Lamenting(x))\nforall x (Milklike(x) and Blowzy(x) -> Lamenting(x))\nforall x (Waxy(x) and not Blowzy(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> Carpetbag(x))\n\nSquamulose(margarita)\n\nLamenting(margarita) and forall x (Lamenting(x) -> Milklike(x)) -> therefore Milklike(margarita) Milklike(margarita) and forall x (Milklike(x) -> Squamulose(x)) -> therefore Squamulose(margarita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Wash is servile. Boris is electronic. Karrah is dental. Geri is dental. If Boris is well then Boris is electronic. If something is electronic then it is well. All electronic, dental things are not well. If something is oecumenic and analytical then it is electronic. All well, servile things are electronic. If something is analytical and not servile then it is ocellated. All well things are ocellated. All ocellated things are oecumenic. Boris is not ocellated.", "logic": "\nServile(wash)\nElectronic(boris)\nDental(karrah)\nDental(geri)\nWell(boris) -> Electronic(boris)\nforall x (Electronic(x) -> Well(x))\nforall x (Electronic(x) and Dental(x) -> not Well(x))\nforall x (Oecumenic(x) and Analytical(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Well(x) and Servile(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Analytical(x) and not Servile(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Well(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\n\nnot Ocellated(boris)\n\nElectronic(boris) and forall x (Electronic(x) -> Well(x)) -> therefore Well(boris) Well(boris) and forall x (Well(x) -> Ocellated(x)) -> therefore Ocellated(boris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Englebert is despotical. Chickie is unfed. Arielle is annexal. Rozanna is annexal. If Chickie is unexacting then Chickie is unfed. If something is unfed then it is unexacting. All unfed, annexal things are not unexacting. If something is haywire and cognitive then it is unfed. All unexacting, despotical things are unfed. If something is cognitive and not despotical then it is milled. All unexacting things are milled. All milled things are haywire. Chickie is haywire.", "logic": "\nDespotical(englebert)\nUnfed(chickie)\nAnnexal(arielle)\nAnnexal(rozanna)\nUnexacting(chickie) -> Unfed(chickie)\nforall x (Unfed(x) -> Unexacting(x))\nforall x (Unfed(x) and Annexal(x) -> not Unexacting(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Cognitive(x) -> Unfed(x))\nforall x (Unexacting(x) and Despotical(x) -> Unfed(x))\nforall x (Cognitive(x) and not Despotical(x) -> Milled(x))\nforall x (Unexacting(x) -> Milled(x))\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Haywire(x))\n\nHaywire(chickie)\n\nUnfed(chickie) and forall x (Unfed(x) -> Unexacting(x)) -> therefore Unexacting(chickie) Unexacting(chickie) and forall x (Unexacting(x) -> Milled(x)) -> therefore Milled(chickie) Milled(chickie) and forall x (Milled(x) -> Haywire(x)) -> therefore Haywire(chickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Ian is bilobated. Josefa is oppressed. Elbertina is inductive. Morgan is inductive. If Josefa is rackety then Josefa is oppressed. If something is oppressed then it is rackety. All oppressed, inductive things are not rackety. If something is dismissed and blemished then it is oppressed. All rackety, bilobated things are oppressed. If something is blemished and not bilobated then it is lxxvi. All rackety things are lxxvi. All lxxvi things are dismissed. Josefa is not dismissed.", "logic": "\nBilobated(ian)\nOppressed(josefa)\nInductive(elbertina)\nInductive(morgan)\nRackety(josefa) -> Oppressed(josefa)\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Rackety(x))\nforall x (Oppressed(x) and Inductive(x) -> not Rackety(x))\nforall x (Dismissed(x) and Blemished(x) -> Oppressed(x))\nforall x (Rackety(x) and Bilobated(x) -> Oppressed(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) and not Bilobated(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Rackety(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Dismissed(x))\n\nnot Dismissed(josefa)\n\nOppressed(josefa) and forall x (Oppressed(x) -> Rackety(x)) -> therefore Rackety(josefa) Rackety(josefa) and forall x (Rackety(x) -> Lxxvi(x)) -> therefore Lxxvi(josefa) Lxxvi(josefa) and forall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Dismissed(x)) -> therefore Dismissed(josefa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Jarrett is beatable. Tessi is spry. Halli is desperate. Dryke is desperate. If Tessi is coordinate then Tessi is spry. If something is spry then it is coordinate. All spry, desperate things are not coordinate. If something is literal and systolic then it is spry. All coordinate, beatable things are spry. If something is systolic and not beatable then it is unpointed. All coordinate things are unpointed. All unpointed things are literal. Halli is not spry.", "logic": "\nBeatable(jarrett)\nSpry(tessi)\nDesperate(halli)\nDesperate(dryke)\nCoordinate(tessi) -> Spry(tessi)\nforall x (Spry(x) -> Coordinate(x))\nforall x (Spry(x) and Desperate(x) -> not Coordinate(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Systolic(x) -> Spry(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) and Beatable(x) -> Spry(x))\nforall x (Systolic(x) and not Beatable(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Literal(x))\n\nnot Spry(halli)\n\nforall x (Literal(x) and Systolic(x) -> Spry(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Shir is hilly. Jonny is mundane. Lockwood is pilose. Robyn is pilose. If Jonny is screechy then Jonny is mundane. If something is mundane then it is screechy. All mundane, pilose things are not screechy. If something is hiemal and ironical then it is mundane. All screechy, hilly things are mundane. If something is ironical and not hilly then it is puzzled. All screechy things are puzzled. All puzzled things are hiemal. Shir is mundane.", "logic": "\nHilly(shir)\nMundane(jonny)\nPilose(lockwood)\nPilose(robyn)\nScreechy(jonny) -> Mundane(jonny)\nforall x (Mundane(x) -> Screechy(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) and Pilose(x) -> not Screechy(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) and Ironical(x) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Screechy(x) and Hilly(x) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Ironical(x) and not Hilly(x) -> Puzzled(x))\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Puzzled(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Hiemal(x))\n\nMundane(shir)\n\nforall x (Screechy(x) and Hilly(x) -> Mundane(x)) <- forall x (Mundane(x) -> Screechy(x)) <- forall x (Hiemal(x) and Ironical(x) -> Mundane(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Nannette is asthmatic. Zia is bilateral. Aili is fancied. Rockwell is fancied. If Zia is toiling then Zia is bilateral. If something is bilateral then it is toiling. All bilateral, fancied things are not toiling. If something is acerate and exhaustive then it is bilateral. All toiling, asthmatic things are bilateral. If something is exhaustive and not asthmatic then it is marsupial. All toiling things are marsupial. All marsupial things are acerate. Aili is not toiling.", "logic": "\nAsthmatic(nannette)\nBilateral(zia)\nFancied(aili)\nFancied(rockwell)\nToiling(zia) -> Bilateral(zia)\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Fancied(x) -> not Toiling(x))\nforall x (Acerate(x) and Exhaustive(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Asthmatic(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) and not Asthmatic(x) -> Marsupial(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) -> Marsupial(x))\nforall x (Marsupial(x) -> Acerate(x))\n\nnot Toiling(aili)\n\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Toiling(x)) <- forall x (Acerate(x) and Exhaustive(x) -> Bilateral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Verne is semipublic. Michelle is infrared. Godwin is macerative. Gideon is macerative. If Michelle is shortish then Michelle is infrared. If something is infrared then it is shortish. All infrared, macerative things are not shortish. If something is attached and steamy then it is infrared. All shortish, semipublic things are infrared. If something is steamy and not semipublic then it is anecdotal. All shortish things are anecdotal. All anecdotal things are attached. Verne is anecdotal.", "logic": "\nSemipublic(verne)\nInfrared(michelle)\nMacerative(godwin)\nMacerative(gideon)\nShortish(michelle) -> Infrared(michelle)\nforall x (Infrared(x) -> Shortish(x))\nforall x (Infrared(x) and Macerative(x) -> not Shortish(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Steamy(x) -> Infrared(x))\nforall x (Shortish(x) and Semipublic(x) -> Infrared(x))\nforall x (Steamy(x) and not Semipublic(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) -> Attached(x))\n\nAnecdotal(verne)\n\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Anecdotal(x)) <- forall x (Infrared(x) -> Shortish(x)) <- forall x (Attached(x) and Steamy(x) -> Infrared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Elli is threepenny. Carilyn is nonprofit. Sisile is copesetic. Tressa is copesetic. If Carilyn is unuseable then Carilyn is nonprofit. If something is nonprofit then it is unuseable. All nonprofit, copesetic things are not unuseable. If something is burdened and actinic then it is nonprofit. All unuseable, threepenny things are nonprofit. If something is actinic and not threepenny then it is unchecked. All unuseable things are unchecked. All unchecked things are burdened. Elli is not copesetic.", "logic": "\nThreepenny(elli)\nNonprofit(carilyn)\nCopesetic(sisile)\nCopesetic(tressa)\nUnuseable(carilyn) -> Nonprofit(carilyn)\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) and Copesetic(x) -> not Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Burdened(x) and Actinic(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) and Threepenny(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Actinic(x) and not Threepenny(x) -> Unchecked(x))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) -> Unchecked(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) -> Burdened(x))\n\nnot Copesetic(elli)\n\nnot Copesetic(elli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Nikki is infrahuman. Edmund is poriferous. Sena is aphetic. Stephi is aphetic. If Edmund is arcane then Edmund is poriferous. If something is poriferous then it is arcane. All poriferous, aphetic things are not arcane. If something is bimotored and downtown then it is poriferous. All arcane, infrahuman things are poriferous. If something is downtown and not infrahuman then it is unsaid. All arcane things are unsaid. All unsaid things are bimotored. Sena is infrahuman.", "logic": "\nInfrahuman(nikki)\nPoriferous(edmund)\nAphetic(sena)\nAphetic(stephi)\nArcane(edmund) -> Poriferous(edmund)\nforall x (Poriferous(x) -> Arcane(x))\nforall x (Poriferous(x) and Aphetic(x) -> not Arcane(x))\nforall x (Bimotored(x) and Downtown(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Infrahuman(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Downtown(x) and not Infrahuman(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Bimotored(x))\n\nInfrahuman(sena)\n\nInfrahuman(sena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Barb is verminous. Madeleine is waxing. Fowler is protracted. Delilah is protracted. If Madeleine is tanned then Madeleine is waxing. If something is waxing then it is tanned. All waxing, protracted things are not tanned. If something is deadened and countless then it is waxing. All tanned, verminous things are waxing. If something is countless and not verminous then it is myeloid. All tanned things are myeloid. All myeloid things are deadened. Barb is not countless.", "logic": "\nVerminous(barb)\nWaxing(madeleine)\nProtracted(fowler)\nProtracted(delilah)\nTanned(madeleine) -> Waxing(madeleine)\nforall x (Waxing(x) -> Tanned(x))\nforall x (Waxing(x) and Protracted(x) -> not Tanned(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) and Countless(x) -> Waxing(x))\nforall x (Tanned(x) and Verminous(x) -> Waxing(x))\nforall x (Countless(x) and not Verminous(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Tanned(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) -> Deadened(x))\n\nnot Countless(barb)\n\nnot Countless(barb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Tymothy is buxom. Tab is impending. Loretta is ptolemaic. Waring is ptolemaic. If Tab is steroidal then Tab is impending. If something is impending then it is steroidal. All impending, ptolemaic things are not steroidal. If something is westmost and footsure then it is impending. All steroidal, buxom things are impending. If something is footsure and not buxom then it is cyclic. All steroidal things are cyclic. All cyclic things are westmost. Loretta is footsure.", "logic": "\nBuxom(tymothy)\nImpending(tab)\nPtolemaic(loretta)\nPtolemaic(waring)\nSteroidal(tab) -> Impending(tab)\nforall x (Impending(x) -> Steroidal(x))\nforall x (Impending(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> not Steroidal(x))\nforall x (Westmost(x) and Footsure(x) -> Impending(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Buxom(x) -> Impending(x))\nforall x (Footsure(x) and not Buxom(x) -> Cyclic(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) -> Cyclic(x))\nforall x (Cyclic(x) -> Westmost(x))\n\nFootsure(loretta)\n\nFootsure(loretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "The jermayne does not visit the germain. The germain is conceptual. The germain is not hydroxy. The germain whistle the joshuah. The germain jump the debi. The germain adventure the jermayne. The germain does not visit the joshuah. The debi jump the jermayne. The joshuah adventure the jermayne. The joshuah adventure the debi. If something adventure the jermayne then the jermayne adventure the debi. If something jump the debi then it whistle the jermayne. If the joshuah jump the jermayne and the jermayne is foggy then the joshuah is not foggy. If something jump the jermayne and it adventure the debi then the jermayne does not need the debi. If something adventure the germain then it jump the germain. If something whistle the joshuah then the joshuah adventure the germain. If something adventure the debi then it is not conceptual. If something jump the germain then it whistle the joshuah. The debi jump the jermayne.", "logic": "\nnot Adventure(jermayne, germain)\nConceptual(germain)\nnot Hydroxy(germain)\nWhistle(germain, joshuah)\nJump(germain, debi)\nAdventure(germain, jermayne)\nnot Adventure(germain, joshuah)\nJump(debi, jermayne)\nAdventure(joshuah, jermayne)\nAdventure(joshuah, debi)\nforall x (Adventure(x, jermayne) -> Adventure(jermayne, debi))\nforall x (Jump(x, debi) -> Whistle(x, jermayne))\nJump(joshuah, jermayne) and Foggy(jermayne) -> not Foggy(joshuah)\nforall x (Jump(x, jermayne) and Adventure(x, debi) -> not Whistle(jermayne, debi))\nforall x (Adventure(x, germain) -> Jump(x, germain))\nforall x (Whistle(x, joshuah) -> Adventure(joshuah, germain))\nforall x (Adventure(x, debi) -> not Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Jump(x, germain) -> Whistle(x, joshuah))\n\nJump(debi, jermayne)\n\ntherefore Jump(debi, jermayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The alexander does not visit the babs. The babs is criterial. The babs is not soigne. The babs catenulate the sherwynd. The babs lower the hailee. The babs autotomize the alexander. The babs does not visit the sherwynd. The hailee lower the alexander. The sherwynd autotomize the alexander. The sherwynd autotomize the hailee. If something autotomize the alexander then the alexander autotomize the hailee. If something lower the hailee then it catenulate the alexander. If the sherwynd lower the alexander and the alexander is boon then the sherwynd is not boon. If something lower the alexander and it autotomize the hailee then the alexander does not need the hailee. If something autotomize the babs then it lower the babs. If something catenulate the sherwynd then the sherwynd autotomize the babs. If something autotomize the hailee then it is not criterial. If something lower the babs then it catenulate the sherwynd. The babs does not need the sherwynd.", "logic": "\nnot Autotomize(alexander, babs)\nCriterial(babs)\nnot Soigne(babs)\nCatenulate(babs, sherwynd)\nLower(babs, hailee)\nAutotomize(babs, alexander)\nnot Autotomize(babs, sherwynd)\nLower(hailee, alexander)\nAutotomize(sherwynd, alexander)\nAutotomize(sherwynd, hailee)\nforall x (Autotomize(x, alexander) -> Autotomize(alexander, hailee))\nforall x (Lower(x, hailee) -> Catenulate(x, alexander))\nLower(sherwynd, alexander) and Boon(alexander) -> not Boon(sherwynd)\nforall x (Lower(x, alexander) and Autotomize(x, hailee) -> not Catenulate(alexander, hailee))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, babs) -> Lower(x, babs))\nforall x (Catenulate(x, sherwynd) -> Autotomize(sherwynd, babs))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, hailee) -> not Criterial(x))\nforall x (Lower(x, babs) -> Catenulate(x, sherwynd))\n\nnot Catenulate(babs, sherwynd)\n\ntherefore Catenulate(babs, sherwynd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The mona does not visit the sheela. The sheela is diastolic. The sheela is not orthodox. The sheela cheerlead the lyle. The sheela fuel the terrell. The sheela lengthen the mona. The sheela does not visit the lyle. The terrell fuel the mona. The lyle lengthen the mona. The lyle lengthen the terrell. If something lengthen the mona then the mona lengthen the terrell. If something fuel the terrell then it cheerlead the mona. If the lyle fuel the mona and the mona is withdrawn then the lyle is not withdrawn. If something fuel the mona and it lengthen the terrell then the mona does not need the terrell. If something lengthen the sheela then it fuel the sheela. If something cheerlead the lyle then the lyle lengthen the sheela. If something lengthen the terrell then it is not diastolic. If something fuel the sheela then it cheerlead the lyle. The mona lengthen the terrell.", "logic": "\nnot Lengthen(mona, sheela)\nDiastolic(sheela)\nnot Orthodox(sheela)\nCheerlead(sheela, lyle)\nFuel(sheela, terrell)\nLengthen(sheela, mona)\nnot Lengthen(sheela, lyle)\nFuel(terrell, mona)\nLengthen(lyle, mona)\nLengthen(lyle, terrell)\nforall x (Lengthen(x, mona) -> Lengthen(mona, terrell))\nforall x (Fuel(x, terrell) -> Cheerlead(x, mona))\nFuel(lyle, mona) and Withdrawn(mona) -> not Withdrawn(lyle)\nforall x (Fuel(x, mona) and Lengthen(x, terrell) -> not Cheerlead(mona, terrell))\nforall x (Lengthen(x, sheela) -> Fuel(x, sheela))\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, lyle) -> Lengthen(lyle, sheela))\nforall x (Lengthen(x, terrell) -> not Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Fuel(x, sheela) -> Cheerlead(x, lyle))\n\nLengthen(mona, terrell)\n\nLengthen(sheela, mona) and forall x (Lengthen(x, mona) -> Lengthen(mona, terrell)) -> therefore Lengthen(mona, terrell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The paola does not visit the jane. The jane is hydroxy. The jane is not paradisaic. The jane siphon the steven. The jane dream the coreen. The jane clout the paola. The jane does not visit the steven. The coreen dream the paola. The steven clout the paola. The steven clout the coreen. If something clout the paola then the paola clout the coreen. If something dream the coreen then it siphon the paola. If the steven dream the paola and the paola is micro then the steven is not micro. If something dream the paola and it clout the coreen then the paola does not need the coreen. If something clout the jane then it dream the jane. If something siphon the steven then the steven clout the jane. If something clout the coreen then it is not hydroxy. If something dream the jane then it siphon the steven. The paola does not visit the coreen.", "logic": "\nnot Clout(paola, jane)\nHydroxy(jane)\nnot Paradisaic(jane)\nSiphon(jane, steven)\nDream(jane, coreen)\nClout(jane, paola)\nnot Clout(jane, steven)\nDream(coreen, paola)\nClout(steven, paola)\nClout(steven, coreen)\nforall x (Clout(x, paola) -> Clout(paola, coreen))\nforall x (Dream(x, coreen) -> Siphon(x, paola))\nDream(steven, paola) and Micro(paola) -> not Micro(steven)\nforall x (Dream(x, paola) and Clout(x, coreen) -> not Siphon(paola, coreen))\nforall x (Clout(x, jane) -> Dream(x, jane))\nforall x (Siphon(x, steven) -> Clout(steven, jane))\nforall x (Clout(x, coreen) -> not Hydroxy(x))\nforall x (Dream(x, jane) -> Siphon(x, steven))\n\nnot Clout(paola, coreen)\n\nClout(jane, paola) and forall x (Clout(x, paola) -> Clout(paola, coreen)) -> therefore Clout(paola, coreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The heda does not visit the delaney. The delaney is yogic. The delaney is not collect. The delaney occur the anya. The delaney stripe the hamlen. The delaney strickle the heda. The delaney does not visit the anya. The hamlen stripe the heda. The anya strickle the heda. The anya strickle the hamlen. If something strickle the heda then the heda strickle the hamlen. If something stripe the hamlen then it occur the heda. If the anya stripe the heda and the heda is uncharted then the anya is not uncharted. If something stripe the heda and it strickle the hamlen then the heda does not need the hamlen. If something strickle the delaney then it stripe the delaney. If something occur the anya then the anya strickle the delaney. If something strickle the hamlen then it is not yogic. If something stripe the delaney then it occur the anya. The anya stripe the delaney.", "logic": "\nnot Strickle(heda, delaney)\nYogic(delaney)\nnot Collect(delaney)\nOccur(delaney, anya)\nStripe(delaney, hamlen)\nStrickle(delaney, heda)\nnot Strickle(delaney, anya)\nStripe(hamlen, heda)\nStrickle(anya, heda)\nStrickle(anya, hamlen)\nforall x (Strickle(x, heda) -> Strickle(heda, hamlen))\nforall x (Stripe(x, hamlen) -> Occur(x, heda))\nStripe(anya, heda) and Uncharted(heda) -> not Uncharted(anya)\nforall x (Stripe(x, heda) and Strickle(x, hamlen) -> not Occur(heda, hamlen))\nforall x (Strickle(x, delaney) -> Stripe(x, delaney))\nforall x (Occur(x, anya) -> Strickle(anya, delaney))\nforall x (Strickle(x, hamlen) -> not Yogic(x))\nforall x (Stripe(x, delaney) -> Occur(x, anya))\n\nStripe(anya, delaney)\n\nOccur(delaney, anya) and forall x (Occur(x, anya) -> Strickle(anya, delaney)) -> therefore Strickle(anya, delaney) Strickle(anya, delaney) and forall x (Strickle(x, delaney) -> Stripe(x, delaney)) -> therefore Stripe(anya, delaney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The catie does not visit the bethena. The bethena is moldovan. The bethena is not sightly. The bethena embower the josefina. The bethena succor the greggory. The bethena bloody the catie. The bethena does not visit the josefina. The greggory succor the catie. The josefina bloody the catie. The josefina bloody the greggory. If something bloody the catie then the catie bloody the greggory. If something succor the greggory then it embower the catie. If the josefina succor the catie and the catie is sere then the josefina is not sere. If something succor the catie and it bloody the greggory then the catie does not need the greggory. If something bloody the bethena then it succor the bethena. If something embower the josefina then the josefina bloody the bethena. If something bloody the greggory then it is not moldovan. If something succor the bethena then it embower the josefina. The josefina does not see the bethena.", "logic": "\nnot Bloody(catie, bethena)\nMoldovan(bethena)\nnot Sightly(bethena)\nEmbower(bethena, josefina)\nSuccor(bethena, greggory)\nBloody(bethena, catie)\nnot Bloody(bethena, josefina)\nSuccor(greggory, catie)\nBloody(josefina, catie)\nBloody(josefina, greggory)\nforall x (Bloody(x, catie) -> Bloody(catie, greggory))\nforall x (Succor(x, greggory) -> Embower(x, catie))\nSuccor(josefina, catie) and Sere(catie) -> not Sere(josefina)\nforall x (Succor(x, catie) and Bloody(x, greggory) -> not Embower(catie, greggory))\nforall x (Bloody(x, bethena) -> Succor(x, bethena))\nforall x (Embower(x, josefina) -> Bloody(josefina, bethena))\nforall x (Bloody(x, greggory) -> not Moldovan(x))\nforall x (Succor(x, bethena) -> Embower(x, josefina))\n\nnot Succor(josefina, bethena)\n\nEmbower(bethena, josefina) and forall x (Embower(x, josefina) -> Bloody(josefina, bethena)) -> therefore Bloody(josefina, bethena) Bloody(josefina, bethena) and forall x (Bloody(x, bethena) -> Succor(x, bethena)) -> therefore Succor(josefina, bethena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The job does not visit the nickie. The nickie is casebook. The nickie is not qualified. The nickie zero the osborn. The nickie staple the cherise. The nickie direct the job. The nickie does not visit the osborn. The cherise staple the job. The osborn direct the job. The osborn direct the cherise. If something direct the job then the job direct the cherise. If something staple the cherise then it zero the job. If the osborn staple the job and the job is whole then the osborn is not whole. If something staple the job and it direct the cherise then the job does not need the cherise. If something direct the nickie then it staple the nickie. If something zero the osborn then the osborn direct the nickie. If something direct the cherise then it is not casebook. If something staple the nickie then it zero the osborn. The osborn zero the osborn.", "logic": "\nnot Direct(job, nickie)\nCasebook(nickie)\nnot Qualified(nickie)\nZero(nickie, osborn)\nStaple(nickie, cherise)\nDirect(nickie, job)\nnot Direct(nickie, osborn)\nStaple(cherise, job)\nDirect(osborn, job)\nDirect(osborn, cherise)\nforall x (Direct(x, job) -> Direct(job, cherise))\nforall x (Staple(x, cherise) -> Zero(x, job))\nStaple(osborn, job) and Whole(job) -> not Whole(osborn)\nforall x (Staple(x, job) and Direct(x, cherise) -> not Zero(job, cherise))\nforall x (Direct(x, nickie) -> Staple(x, nickie))\nforall x (Zero(x, osborn) -> Direct(osborn, nickie))\nforall x (Direct(x, cherise) -> not Casebook(x))\nforall x (Staple(x, nickie) -> Zero(x, osborn))\n\nZero(osborn, osborn)\n\nZero(nickie, osborn) and forall x (Zero(x, osborn) -> Direct(osborn, nickie)) -> therefore Direct(osborn, nickie) Direct(osborn, nickie) and forall x (Direct(x, nickie) -> Staple(x, nickie)) -> therefore Staple(osborn, nickie) Staple(osborn, nickie) and forall x (Staple(x, nickie) -> Zero(x, osborn)) -> therefore Zero(osborn, osborn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The desmond does not visit the gena. The gena is birken. The gena is not enabling. The gena corrupt the mirna. The gena transfix the jedediah. The gena preclude the desmond. The gena does not visit the mirna. The jedediah transfix the desmond. The mirna preclude the desmond. The mirna preclude the jedediah. If something preclude the desmond then the desmond preclude the jedediah. If something transfix the jedediah then it corrupt the desmond. If the mirna transfix the desmond and the desmond is chilly then the mirna is not chilly. If something transfix the desmond and it preclude the jedediah then the desmond does not need the jedediah. If something preclude the gena then it transfix the gena. If something corrupt the mirna then the mirna preclude the gena. If something preclude the jedediah then it is not birken. If something transfix the gena then it corrupt the mirna. The mirna does not need the mirna.", "logic": "\nnot Preclude(desmond, gena)\nBirken(gena)\nnot Enabling(gena)\nCorrupt(gena, mirna)\nTransfix(gena, jedediah)\nPreclude(gena, desmond)\nnot Preclude(gena, mirna)\nTransfix(jedediah, desmond)\nPreclude(mirna, desmond)\nPreclude(mirna, jedediah)\nforall x (Preclude(x, desmond) -> Preclude(desmond, jedediah))\nforall x (Transfix(x, jedediah) -> Corrupt(x, desmond))\nTransfix(mirna, desmond) and Chilly(desmond) -> not Chilly(mirna)\nforall x (Transfix(x, desmond) and Preclude(x, jedediah) -> not Corrupt(desmond, jedediah))\nforall x (Preclude(x, gena) -> Transfix(x, gena))\nforall x (Corrupt(x, mirna) -> Preclude(mirna, gena))\nforall x (Preclude(x, jedediah) -> not Birken(x))\nforall x (Transfix(x, gena) -> Corrupt(x, mirna))\n\nnot Corrupt(mirna, mirna)\n\nCorrupt(gena, mirna) and forall x (Corrupt(x, mirna) -> Preclude(mirna, gena)) -> therefore Preclude(mirna, gena) Preclude(mirna, gena) and forall x (Preclude(x, gena) -> Transfix(x, gena)) -> therefore Transfix(mirna, gena) Transfix(mirna, gena) and forall x (Transfix(x, gena) -> Corrupt(x, mirna)) -> therefore Corrupt(mirna, mirna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The willis does not visit the wilburn. The wilburn is frosted. The wilburn is not statute. The wilburn depilate the pyotr. The wilburn encore the marrilee. The wilburn impel the willis. The wilburn does not visit the pyotr. The marrilee encore the willis. The pyotr impel the willis. The pyotr impel the marrilee. If something impel the willis then the willis impel the marrilee. If something encore the marrilee then it depilate the willis. If the pyotr encore the willis and the willis is iberian then the pyotr is not iberian. If something encore the willis and it impel the marrilee then the willis does not need the marrilee. If something impel the wilburn then it encore the wilburn. If something depilate the pyotr then the pyotr impel the wilburn. If something impel the marrilee then it is not frosted. If something encore the wilburn then it depilate the pyotr. The pyotr does not need the willis.", "logic": "\nnot Impel(willis, wilburn)\nFrosted(wilburn)\nnot Statute(wilburn)\nDepilate(wilburn, pyotr)\nEncore(wilburn, marrilee)\nImpel(wilburn, willis)\nnot Impel(wilburn, pyotr)\nEncore(marrilee, willis)\nImpel(pyotr, willis)\nImpel(pyotr, marrilee)\nforall x (Impel(x, willis) -> Impel(willis, marrilee))\nforall x (Encore(x, marrilee) -> Depilate(x, willis))\nEncore(pyotr, willis) and Iberian(willis) -> not Iberian(pyotr)\nforall x (Encore(x, willis) and Impel(x, marrilee) -> not Depilate(willis, marrilee))\nforall x (Impel(x, wilburn) -> Encore(x, wilburn))\nforall x (Depilate(x, pyotr) -> Impel(pyotr, wilburn))\nforall x (Impel(x, marrilee) -> not Frosted(x))\nforall x (Encore(x, wilburn) -> Depilate(x, pyotr))\n\nnot Depilate(pyotr, willis)\n\nforall x (Encore(x, marrilee) -> Depilate(x, willis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The skylar does not visit the raven. The raven is tapped. The raven is not nomadic. The raven disfavour the ave. The raven burnish the honoria. The raven falsify the skylar. The raven does not visit the ave. The honoria burnish the skylar. The ave falsify the skylar. The ave falsify the honoria. If something falsify the skylar then the skylar falsify the honoria. If something burnish the honoria then it disfavour the skylar. If the ave burnish the skylar and the skylar is impersonal then the ave is not impersonal. If something burnish the skylar and it falsify the honoria then the skylar does not need the honoria. If something falsify the raven then it burnish the raven. If something disfavour the ave then the ave falsify the raven. If something falsify the honoria then it is not tapped. If something burnish the raven then it disfavour the ave. The honoria burnish the raven.", "logic": "\nnot Falsify(skylar, raven)\nTapped(raven)\nnot Nomadic(raven)\nDisfavour(raven, ave)\nBurnish(raven, honoria)\nFalsify(raven, skylar)\nnot Falsify(raven, ave)\nBurnish(honoria, skylar)\nFalsify(ave, skylar)\nFalsify(ave, honoria)\nforall x (Falsify(x, skylar) -> Falsify(skylar, honoria))\nforall x (Burnish(x, honoria) -> Disfavour(x, skylar))\nBurnish(ave, skylar) and Impersonal(skylar) -> not Impersonal(ave)\nforall x (Burnish(x, skylar) and Falsify(x, honoria) -> not Disfavour(skylar, honoria))\nforall x (Falsify(x, raven) -> Burnish(x, raven))\nforall x (Disfavour(x, ave) -> Falsify(ave, raven))\nforall x (Falsify(x, honoria) -> not Tapped(x))\nforall x (Burnish(x, raven) -> Disfavour(x, ave))\n\nBurnish(honoria, raven)\n\nforall x (Falsify(x, raven) -> Burnish(x, raven)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The bartlett does not visit the frederich. The frederich is dissolved. The frederich is not wired. The frederich clamor the eleonore. The frederich ensile the sherry. The frederich unbind the bartlett. The frederich does not visit the eleonore. The sherry ensile the bartlett. The eleonore unbind the bartlett. The eleonore unbind the sherry. If something unbind the bartlett then the bartlett unbind the sherry. If something ensile the sherry then it clamor the bartlett. If the eleonore ensile the bartlett and the bartlett is guttural then the eleonore is not guttural. If something ensile the bartlett and it unbind the sherry then the bartlett does not need the sherry. If something unbind the frederich then it ensile the frederich. If something clamor the eleonore then the eleonore unbind the frederich. If something unbind the sherry then it is not dissolved. If something ensile the frederich then it clamor the eleonore. The bartlett does not need the bartlett.", "logic": "\nnot Unbind(bartlett, frederich)\nDissolved(frederich)\nnot Wired(frederich)\nClamor(frederich, eleonore)\nEnsile(frederich, sherry)\nUnbind(frederich, bartlett)\nnot Unbind(frederich, eleonore)\nEnsile(sherry, bartlett)\nUnbind(eleonore, bartlett)\nUnbind(eleonore, sherry)\nforall x (Unbind(x, bartlett) -> Unbind(bartlett, sherry))\nforall x (Ensile(x, sherry) -> Clamor(x, bartlett))\nEnsile(eleonore, bartlett) and Guttural(bartlett) -> not Guttural(eleonore)\nforall x (Ensile(x, bartlett) and Unbind(x, sherry) -> not Clamor(bartlett, sherry))\nforall x (Unbind(x, frederich) -> Ensile(x, frederich))\nforall x (Clamor(x, eleonore) -> Unbind(eleonore, frederich))\nforall x (Unbind(x, sherry) -> not Dissolved(x))\nforall x (Ensile(x, frederich) -> Clamor(x, eleonore))\n\nnot Clamor(bartlett, bartlett)\n\nforall x (Ensile(x, sherry) -> Clamor(x, bartlett)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The katey does not visit the katrine. The katrine is eldritch. The katrine is not dividable. The katrine endorse the richard. The katrine prepare the eliot. The katrine precis the katey. The katrine does not visit the richard. The eliot prepare the katey. The richard precis the katey. The richard precis the eliot. If something precis the katey then the katey precis the eliot. If something prepare the eliot then it endorse the katey. If the richard prepare the katey and the katey is winsome then the richard is not winsome. If something prepare the katey and it precis the eliot then the katey does not need the eliot. If something precis the katrine then it prepare the katrine. If something endorse the richard then the richard precis the katrine. If something precis the eliot then it is not eldritch. If something prepare the katrine then it endorse the richard. The eliot endorse the richard.", "logic": "\nnot Precis(katey, katrine)\nEldritch(katrine)\nnot Dividable(katrine)\nEndorse(katrine, richard)\nPrepare(katrine, eliot)\nPrecis(katrine, katey)\nnot Precis(katrine, richard)\nPrepare(eliot, katey)\nPrecis(richard, katey)\nPrecis(richard, eliot)\nforall x (Precis(x, katey) -> Precis(katey, eliot))\nforall x (Prepare(x, eliot) -> Endorse(x, katey))\nPrepare(richard, katey) and Winsome(katey) -> not Winsome(richard)\nforall x (Prepare(x, katey) and Precis(x, eliot) -> not Endorse(katey, eliot))\nforall x (Precis(x, katrine) -> Prepare(x, katrine))\nforall x (Endorse(x, richard) -> Precis(richard, katrine))\nforall x (Precis(x, eliot) -> not Eldritch(x))\nforall x (Prepare(x, katrine) -> Endorse(x, richard))\n\nEndorse(eliot, richard)\n\nforall x (Prepare(x, katrine) -> Endorse(x, richard)) <- forall x (Precis(x, katrine) -> Prepare(x, katrine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The darice does not visit the isobel. The isobel is wondering. The isobel is not creamy. The isobel relive the eleanore. The isobel deregulate the barny. The isobel moonshine the darice. The isobel does not visit the eleanore. The barny deregulate the darice. The eleanore moonshine the darice. The eleanore moonshine the barny. If something moonshine the darice then the darice moonshine the barny. If something deregulate the barny then it relive the darice. If the eleanore deregulate the darice and the darice is degraded then the eleanore is not degraded. If something deregulate the darice and it moonshine the barny then the darice does not need the barny. If something moonshine the isobel then it deregulate the isobel. If something relive the eleanore then the eleanore moonshine the isobel. If something moonshine the barny then it is not wondering. If something deregulate the isobel then it relive the eleanore. The eleanore does not see the darice.", "logic": "\nnot Moonshine(darice, isobel)\nWondering(isobel)\nnot Creamy(isobel)\nRelive(isobel, eleanore)\nDeregulate(isobel, barny)\nMoonshine(isobel, darice)\nnot Moonshine(isobel, eleanore)\nDeregulate(barny, darice)\nMoonshine(eleanore, darice)\nMoonshine(eleanore, barny)\nforall x (Moonshine(x, darice) -> Moonshine(darice, barny))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, barny) -> Relive(x, darice))\nDeregulate(eleanore, darice) and Degraded(darice) -> not Degraded(eleanore)\nforall x (Deregulate(x, darice) and Moonshine(x, barny) -> not Relive(darice, barny))\nforall x (Moonshine(x, isobel) -> Deregulate(x, isobel))\nforall x (Relive(x, eleanore) -> Moonshine(eleanore, isobel))\nforall x (Moonshine(x, barny) -> not Wondering(x))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, isobel) -> Relive(x, eleanore))\n\nnot Deregulate(eleanore, darice)\n\nnot Deregulate(eleanore, darice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The winny does not visit the hiralal. The hiralal is grapy. The hiralal is not humourless. The hiralal backfire the katleen. The hiralal disforest the riccardo. The hiralal finagle the winny. The hiralal does not visit the katleen. The riccardo disforest the winny. The katleen finagle the winny. The katleen finagle the riccardo. If something finagle the winny then the winny finagle the riccardo. If something disforest the riccardo then it backfire the winny. If the katleen disforest the winny and the winny is awake then the katleen is not awake. If something disforest the winny and it finagle the riccardo then the winny does not need the riccardo. If something finagle the hiralal then it disforest the hiralal. If something backfire the katleen then the katleen finagle the hiralal. If something finagle the riccardo then it is not grapy. If something disforest the hiralal then it backfire the katleen. The riccardo finagle the hiralal.", "logic": "\nnot Finagle(winny, hiralal)\nGrapy(hiralal)\nnot Humourless(hiralal)\nBackfire(hiralal, katleen)\nDisforest(hiralal, riccardo)\nFinagle(hiralal, winny)\nnot Finagle(hiralal, katleen)\nDisforest(riccardo, winny)\nFinagle(katleen, winny)\nFinagle(katleen, riccardo)\nforall x (Finagle(x, winny) -> Finagle(winny, riccardo))\nforall x (Disforest(x, riccardo) -> Backfire(x, winny))\nDisforest(katleen, winny) and Awake(winny) -> not Awake(katleen)\nforall x (Disforest(x, winny) and Finagle(x, riccardo) -> not Backfire(winny, riccardo))\nforall x (Finagle(x, hiralal) -> Disforest(x, hiralal))\nforall x (Backfire(x, katleen) -> Finagle(katleen, hiralal))\nforall x (Finagle(x, riccardo) -> not Grapy(x))\nforall x (Disforest(x, hiralal) -> Backfire(x, katleen))\n\nFinagle(riccardo, hiralal)\n\nFinagle(riccardo, hiralal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The ninnetta does not visit the kostas. The kostas is rotted. The kostas is not amok. The kostas gray the jaymee. The kostas greet the charmane. The kostas cork the ninnetta. The kostas does not visit the jaymee. The charmane greet the ninnetta. The jaymee cork the ninnetta. The jaymee cork the charmane. If something cork the ninnetta then the ninnetta cork the charmane. If something greet the charmane then it gray the ninnetta. If the jaymee greet the ninnetta and the ninnetta is undulate then the jaymee is not undulate. If something greet the ninnetta and it cork the charmane then the ninnetta does not need the charmane. If something cork the kostas then it greet the kostas. If something gray the jaymee then the jaymee cork the kostas. If something cork the charmane then it is not rotted. If something greet the kostas then it gray the jaymee. The kostas does not need the kostas.", "logic": "\nnot Cork(ninnetta, kostas)\nRotted(kostas)\nnot Amok(kostas)\nGray(kostas, jaymee)\nGreet(kostas, charmane)\nCork(kostas, ninnetta)\nnot Cork(kostas, jaymee)\nGreet(charmane, ninnetta)\nCork(jaymee, ninnetta)\nCork(jaymee, charmane)\nforall x (Cork(x, ninnetta) -> Cork(ninnetta, charmane))\nforall x (Greet(x, charmane) -> Gray(x, ninnetta))\nGreet(jaymee, ninnetta) and Undulate(ninnetta) -> not Undulate(jaymee)\nforall x (Greet(x, ninnetta) and Cork(x, charmane) -> not Gray(ninnetta, charmane))\nforall x (Cork(x, kostas) -> Greet(x, kostas))\nforall x (Gray(x, jaymee) -> Cork(jaymee, kostas))\nforall x (Cork(x, charmane) -> not Rotted(x))\nforall x (Greet(x, kostas) -> Gray(x, jaymee))\n\nnot Gray(kostas, kostas)\n\nnot Gray(kostas, kostas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The shirah does not visit the lelia. The lelia is sinewy. The lelia is not peppery. The lelia podcast the nannie. The lelia disoblige the hillary. The lelia redline the shirah. The lelia does not visit the nannie. The hillary disoblige the shirah. The nannie redline the shirah. The nannie redline the hillary. If something redline the shirah then the shirah redline the hillary. If something disoblige the hillary then it podcast the shirah. If the nannie disoblige the shirah and the shirah is lxiii then the nannie is not lxiii. If something disoblige the shirah and it redline the hillary then the shirah does not need the hillary. If something redline the lelia then it disoblige the lelia. If something podcast the nannie then the nannie redline the lelia. If something redline the hillary then it is not sinewy. If something disoblige the lelia then it podcast the nannie. The shirah podcast the lelia.", "logic": "\nnot Redline(shirah, lelia)\nSinewy(lelia)\nnot Peppery(lelia)\nPodcast(lelia, nannie)\nDisoblige(lelia, hillary)\nRedline(lelia, shirah)\nnot Redline(lelia, nannie)\nDisoblige(hillary, shirah)\nRedline(nannie, shirah)\nRedline(nannie, hillary)\nforall x (Redline(x, shirah) -> Redline(shirah, hillary))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, hillary) -> Podcast(x, shirah))\nDisoblige(nannie, shirah) and Lxiii(shirah) -> not Lxiii(nannie)\nforall x (Disoblige(x, shirah) and Redline(x, hillary) -> not Podcast(shirah, hillary))\nforall x (Redline(x, lelia) -> Disoblige(x, lelia))\nforall x (Podcast(x, nannie) -> Redline(nannie, lelia))\nforall x (Redline(x, hillary) -> not Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, lelia) -> Podcast(x, nannie))\n\nPodcast(shirah, lelia)\n\nPodcast(shirah, lelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The eve is incarnate. The lex is windblown. The ashby bustle the tara. The tara awake the ashby. Cold people are not elegiac. If the lex bustle the tara and the lex awake the tara then the lex awake the eve. If someone is incarnate then they visit the ashby. If someone awake the lex and they are not mexican then the lex is not cavernous. If someone bustle the ashby then the ashby is incarnate. If someone is cavernous and they do not like the tara then they visit the lex. If someone awake the eve and they are not mexican then the eve bustle the ashby. If someone croon the lex and they do not visit the ashby then the lex croon the eve. The tara awake the ashby.", "logic": "\nIncarnate(eve)\nWindblown(lex)\nBustle(ashby, tara)\nAwake(tara, ashby)\nforall x (Cavernous(x) -> not Elegiac(x))\nBustle(lex, tara) and Awake(lex, tara) -> Awake(lex, eve)\nforall x (Incarnate(x) -> Bustle(x, ashby))\nforall x (Awake(x, lex) and not Mexican(x) -> not Cavernous(lex))\nforall x (Bustle(x, ashby) -> Incarnate(ashby))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) and not Awake(x, tara) -> Bustle(x, lex))\nforall x (Awake(x, eve) and not Mexican(x) -> Bustle(eve, ashby))\nforall x (Croon(x, lex) and not Bustle(x, ashby) -> Croon(lex, eve))\n\nAwake(tara, ashby)\n\ntherefore Awake(tara, ashby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The maritsa is gamy. The kenton is chiasmic. The mara scupper the sybil. The sybil whitewash the mara. Cold people are not cassocked. If the kenton scupper the sybil and the kenton whitewash the sybil then the kenton whitewash the maritsa. If someone is gamy then they visit the mara. If someone whitewash the kenton and they are not plotted then the kenton is not indigenous. If someone scupper the mara then the mara is gamy. If someone is indigenous and they do not like the sybil then they visit the kenton. If someone whitewash the maritsa and they are not plotted then the maritsa scupper the mara. If someone recollect the kenton and they do not visit the mara then the kenton recollect the maritsa. The maritsa is not gamy.", "logic": "\nGamy(maritsa)\nChiasmic(kenton)\nScupper(mara, sybil)\nWhitewash(sybil, mara)\nforall x (Indigenous(x) -> not Cassocked(x))\nScupper(kenton, sybil) and Whitewash(kenton, sybil) -> Whitewash(kenton, maritsa)\nforall x (Gamy(x) -> Scupper(x, mara))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, kenton) and not Plotted(x) -> not Indigenous(kenton))\nforall x (Scupper(x, mara) -> Gamy(mara))\nforall x (Indigenous(x) and not Whitewash(x, sybil) -> Scupper(x, kenton))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, maritsa) and not Plotted(x) -> Scupper(maritsa, mara))\nforall x (Recollect(x, kenton) and not Scupper(x, mara) -> Recollect(kenton, maritsa))\n\nnot Gamy(maritsa)\n\ntherefore Gamy(maritsa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The correna is unavowed. The urbanus is amatory. The tandy outbid the jermayne. The jermayne frazzle the tandy. Cold people are not xxxii. If the urbanus outbid the jermayne and the urbanus frazzle the jermayne then the urbanus frazzle the correna. If someone is unavowed then they visit the tandy. If someone frazzle the urbanus and they are not sportive then the urbanus is not reachable. If someone outbid the tandy then the tandy is unavowed. If someone is reachable and they do not like the jermayne then they visit the urbanus. If someone frazzle the correna and they are not sportive then the correna outbid the tandy. If someone leverage the urbanus and they do not visit the tandy then the urbanus leverage the correna. The correna outbid the tandy.", "logic": "\nUnavowed(correna)\nAmatory(urbanus)\nOutbid(tandy, jermayne)\nFrazzle(jermayne, tandy)\nforall x (Reachable(x) -> not Xxxii(x))\nOutbid(urbanus, jermayne) and Frazzle(urbanus, jermayne) -> Frazzle(urbanus, correna)\nforall x (Unavowed(x) -> Outbid(x, tandy))\nforall x (Frazzle(x, urbanus) and not Sportive(x) -> not Reachable(urbanus))\nforall x (Outbid(x, tandy) -> Unavowed(tandy))\nforall x (Reachable(x) and not Frazzle(x, jermayne) -> Outbid(x, urbanus))\nforall x (Frazzle(x, correna) and not Sportive(x) -> Outbid(correna, tandy))\nforall x (Leverage(x, urbanus) and not Outbid(x, tandy) -> Leverage(urbanus, correna))\n\nOutbid(correna, tandy)\n\nUnavowed(correna) and forall x (Unavowed(x) -> Outbid(x, tandy)) -> therefore Outbid(correna, tandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The leticia is tenured. The northrop is muggy. The louella hole the dalton. The dalton litigate the louella. Cold people are not haemal. If the northrop hole the dalton and the northrop litigate the dalton then the northrop litigate the leticia. If someone is tenured then they visit the louella. If someone litigate the northrop and they are not scentless then the northrop is not unmanned. If someone hole the louella then the louella is tenured. If someone is unmanned and they do not like the dalton then they visit the northrop. If someone litigate the leticia and they are not scentless then the leticia hole the louella. If someone water the northrop and they do not visit the louella then the northrop water the leticia. The leticia does not visit the louella.", "logic": "\nTenured(leticia)\nMuggy(northrop)\nHole(louella, dalton)\nLitigate(dalton, louella)\nforall x (Unmanned(x) -> not Haemal(x))\nHole(northrop, dalton) and Litigate(northrop, dalton) -> Litigate(northrop, leticia)\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Hole(x, louella))\nforall x (Litigate(x, northrop) and not Scentless(x) -> not Unmanned(northrop))\nforall x (Hole(x, louella) -> Tenured(louella))\nforall x (Unmanned(x) and not Litigate(x, dalton) -> Hole(x, northrop))\nforall x (Litigate(x, leticia) and not Scentless(x) -> Hole(leticia, louella))\nforall x (Water(x, northrop) and not Hole(x, louella) -> Water(northrop, leticia))\n\nnot Hole(leticia, louella)\n\nTenured(leticia) and forall x (Tenured(x) -> Hole(x, louella)) -> therefore Hole(leticia, louella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The gae is vivace. The lucita is hind. The kiele doff the bee. The bee homer the kiele. Cold people are not xcvi. If the lucita doff the bee and the lucita homer the bee then the lucita homer the gae. If someone is vivace then they visit the kiele. If someone homer the lucita and they are not gangrenous then the lucita is not wysiwyg. If someone doff the kiele then the kiele is vivace. If someone is wysiwyg and they do not like the bee then they visit the lucita. If someone homer the gae and they are not gangrenous then the gae doff the kiele. If someone falcon the lucita and they do not visit the kiele then the lucita falcon the gae. The kiele is vivace.", "logic": "\nVivace(gae)\nHind(lucita)\nDoff(kiele, bee)\nHomer(bee, kiele)\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) -> not Xcvi(x))\nDoff(lucita, bee) and Homer(lucita, bee) -> Homer(lucita, gae)\nforall x (Vivace(x) -> Doff(x, kiele))\nforall x (Homer(x, lucita) and not Gangrenous(x) -> not Wysiwyg(lucita))\nforall x (Doff(x, kiele) -> Vivace(kiele))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) and not Homer(x, bee) -> Doff(x, lucita))\nforall x (Homer(x, gae) and not Gangrenous(x) -> Doff(gae, kiele))\nforall x (Falcon(x, lucita) and not Doff(x, kiele) -> Falcon(lucita, gae))\n\nVivace(kiele)\n\nVivace(gae) and forall x (Vivace(x) -> Doff(x, kiele)) -> therefore Doff(gae, kiele) Doff(gae, kiele) and forall x (Doff(x, kiele) -> Vivace(kiele)) -> therefore Vivace(kiele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The arabelle is canescent. The pia is unendowed. The selle abjure the aylmer. The aylmer void the selle. Cold people are not orphaned. If the pia abjure the aylmer and the pia void the aylmer then the pia void the arabelle. If someone is canescent then they visit the selle. If someone void the pia and they are not critical then the pia is not tasseled. If someone abjure the selle then the selle is canescent. If someone is tasseled and they do not like the aylmer then they visit the pia. If someone void the arabelle and they are not critical then the arabelle abjure the selle. If someone weep the pia and they do not visit the selle then the pia weep the arabelle. The selle is not canescent.", "logic": "\nCanescent(arabelle)\nUnendowed(pia)\nAbjure(selle, aylmer)\nVoid(aylmer, selle)\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> not Orphaned(x))\nAbjure(pia, aylmer) and Void(pia, aylmer) -> Void(pia, arabelle)\nforall x (Canescent(x) -> Abjure(x, selle))\nforall x (Void(x, pia) and not Critical(x) -> not Tasseled(pia))\nforall x (Abjure(x, selle) -> Canescent(selle))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and not Void(x, aylmer) -> Abjure(x, pia))\nforall x (Void(x, arabelle) and not Critical(x) -> Abjure(arabelle, selle))\nforall x (Weep(x, pia) and not Abjure(x, selle) -> Weep(pia, arabelle))\n\nnot Canescent(selle)\n\nCanescent(arabelle) and forall x (Canescent(x) -> Abjure(x, selle)) -> therefore Abjure(arabelle, selle) Abjure(arabelle, selle) and forall x (Abjure(x, selle) -> Canescent(selle)) -> therefore Canescent(selle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The justis is aeriform. The bernadina is milky. The mitchel fleece the idell. The idell climb the mitchel. Cold people are not blurry. If the bernadina fleece the idell and the bernadina climb the idell then the bernadina climb the justis. If someone is aeriform then they visit the mitchel. If someone climb the bernadina and they are not acceptive then the bernadina is not acetonic. If someone fleece the mitchel then the mitchel is aeriform. If someone is acetonic and they do not like the idell then they visit the bernadina. If someone climb the justis and they are not acceptive then the justis fleece the mitchel. If someone build the bernadina and they do not visit the mitchel then the bernadina build the justis. The mitchel fleece the mitchel.", "logic": "\nAeriform(justis)\nMilky(bernadina)\nFleece(mitchel, idell)\nClimb(idell, mitchel)\nforall x (Acetonic(x) -> not Blurry(x))\nFleece(bernadina, idell) and Climb(bernadina, idell) -> Climb(bernadina, justis)\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Fleece(x, mitchel))\nforall x (Climb(x, bernadina) and not Acceptive(x) -> not Acetonic(bernadina))\nforall x (Fleece(x, mitchel) -> Aeriform(mitchel))\nforall x (Acetonic(x) and not Climb(x, idell) -> Fleece(x, bernadina))\nforall x (Climb(x, justis) and not Acceptive(x) -> Fleece(justis, mitchel))\nforall x (Build(x, bernadina) and not Fleece(x, mitchel) -> Build(bernadina, justis))\n\nFleece(mitchel, mitchel)\n\nAeriform(justis) and forall x (Aeriform(x) -> Fleece(x, mitchel)) -> therefore Fleece(justis, mitchel) Fleece(justis, mitchel) and forall x (Fleece(x, mitchel) -> Aeriform(mitchel)) -> therefore Aeriform(mitchel) Aeriform(mitchel) and forall x (Aeriform(x) -> Fleece(x, mitchel)) -> therefore Fleece(mitchel, mitchel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The piet is hinder. The elaine is jutting. The zebulon convolve the adrianne. The adrianne widen the zebulon. Cold people are not boreal. If the elaine convolve the adrianne and the elaine widen the adrianne then the elaine widen the piet. If someone is hinder then they visit the zebulon. If someone widen the elaine and they are not beheaded then the elaine is not longhand. If someone convolve the zebulon then the zebulon is hinder. If someone is longhand and they do not like the adrianne then they visit the elaine. If someone widen the piet and they are not beheaded then the piet convolve the zebulon. If someone disburden the elaine and they do not visit the zebulon then the elaine disburden the piet. The zebulon does not visit the zebulon.", "logic": "\nHinder(piet)\nJutting(elaine)\nConvolve(zebulon, adrianne)\nWiden(adrianne, zebulon)\nforall x (Longhand(x) -> not Boreal(x))\nConvolve(elaine, adrianne) and Widen(elaine, adrianne) -> Widen(elaine, piet)\nforall x (Hinder(x) -> Convolve(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Widen(x, elaine) and not Beheaded(x) -> not Longhand(elaine))\nforall x (Convolve(x, zebulon) -> Hinder(zebulon))\nforall x (Longhand(x) and not Widen(x, adrianne) -> Convolve(x, elaine))\nforall x (Widen(x, piet) and not Beheaded(x) -> Convolve(piet, zebulon))\nforall x (Disburden(x, elaine) and not Convolve(x, zebulon) -> Disburden(elaine, piet))\n\nnot Convolve(zebulon, zebulon)\n\nHinder(piet) and forall x (Hinder(x) -> Convolve(x, zebulon)) -> therefore Convolve(piet, zebulon) Convolve(piet, zebulon) and forall x (Convolve(x, zebulon) -> Hinder(zebulon)) -> therefore Hinder(zebulon) Hinder(zebulon) and forall x (Hinder(x) -> Convolve(x, zebulon)) -> therefore Convolve(zebulon, zebulon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The tanya is possessive. The halley is tabular. The greta tear the joan. The joan traipse the greta. Cold people are not deflated. If the halley tear the joan and the halley traipse the joan then the halley traipse the tanya. If someone is possessive then they visit the greta. If someone traipse the halley and they are not homocercal then the halley is not slack. If someone tear the greta then the greta is possessive. If someone is slack and they do not like the joan then they visit the halley. If someone traipse the tanya and they are not homocercal then the tanya tear the greta. If someone report the halley and they do not visit the greta then the halley report the tanya. The halley does not see the tanya.", "logic": "\nPossessive(tanya)\nTabular(halley)\nTear(greta, joan)\nTraipse(joan, greta)\nforall x (Slack(x) -> not Deflated(x))\nTear(halley, joan) and Traipse(halley, joan) -> Traipse(halley, tanya)\nforall x (Possessive(x) -> Tear(x, greta))\nforall x (Traipse(x, halley) and not Homocercal(x) -> not Slack(halley))\nforall x (Tear(x, greta) -> Possessive(greta))\nforall x (Slack(x) and not Traipse(x, joan) -> Tear(x, halley))\nforall x (Traipse(x, tanya) and not Homocercal(x) -> Tear(tanya, greta))\nforall x (Report(x, halley) and not Tear(x, greta) -> Report(halley, tanya))\n\nnot Report(halley, tanya)\n\nforall x (Report(x, halley) and not Tear(x, greta) -> Report(halley, tanya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The rubetta is defiled. The delinda is clean. The dorri splint the andra. The andra carbonize the dorri. Cold people are not analog. If the delinda splint the andra and the delinda carbonize the andra then the delinda carbonize the rubetta. If someone is defiled then they visit the dorri. If someone carbonize the delinda and they are not xxiv then the delinda is not axile. If someone splint the dorri then the dorri is defiled. If someone is axile and they do not like the andra then they visit the delinda. If someone carbonize the rubetta and they are not xxiv then the rubetta splint the dorri. If someone pollute the delinda and they do not visit the dorri then the delinda pollute the rubetta. The andra splint the dorri.", "logic": "\nDefiled(rubetta)\nClean(delinda)\nSplint(dorri, andra)\nCarbonize(andra, dorri)\nforall x (Axile(x) -> not Analog(x))\nSplint(delinda, andra) and Carbonize(delinda, andra) -> Carbonize(delinda, rubetta)\nforall x (Defiled(x) -> Splint(x, dorri))\nforall x (Carbonize(x, delinda) and not Xxiv(x) -> not Axile(delinda))\nforall x (Splint(x, dorri) -> Defiled(dorri))\nforall x (Axile(x) and not Carbonize(x, andra) -> Splint(x, delinda))\nforall x (Carbonize(x, rubetta) and not Xxiv(x) -> Splint(rubetta, dorri))\nforall x (Pollute(x, delinda) and not Splint(x, dorri) -> Pollute(delinda, rubetta))\n\nSplint(andra, dorri)\n\nforall x (Defiled(x) -> Splint(x, dorri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The ken is greased. The willis is dizygotic. The kory wheel the rolf. The rolf bruit the kory. Cold people are not endermic. If the willis wheel the rolf and the willis bruit the rolf then the willis bruit the ken. If someone is greased then they visit the kory. If someone bruit the willis and they are not clouded then the willis is not monogenic. If someone wheel the kory then the kory is greased. If someone is monogenic and they do not like the rolf then they visit the willis. If someone bruit the ken and they are not clouded then the ken wheel the kory. If someone streamline the willis and they do not visit the kory then the willis streamline the ken. The rolf does not visit the willis.", "logic": "\nGreased(ken)\nDizygotic(willis)\nWheel(kory, rolf)\nBruit(rolf, kory)\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> not Endermic(x))\nWheel(willis, rolf) and Bruit(willis, rolf) -> Bruit(willis, ken)\nforall x (Greased(x) -> Wheel(x, kory))\nforall x (Bruit(x, willis) and not Clouded(x) -> not Monogenic(willis))\nforall x (Wheel(x, kory) -> Greased(kory))\nforall x (Monogenic(x) and not Bruit(x, rolf) -> Wheel(x, willis))\nforall x (Bruit(x, ken) and not Clouded(x) -> Wheel(ken, kory))\nforall x (Streamline(x, willis) and not Wheel(x, kory) -> Streamline(willis, ken))\n\nnot Wheel(rolf, willis)\n\nforall x (Monogenic(x) and not Bruit(x, rolf) -> Wheel(x, willis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The jolynn is straggling. The karna is impervious. The che antique the apollo. The apollo expire the che. Cold people are not peppery. If the karna antique the apollo and the karna expire the apollo then the karna expire the jolynn. If someone is straggling then they visit the che. If someone expire the karna and they are not armorial then the karna is not vulnerable. If someone antique the che then the che is straggling. If someone is vulnerable and they do not like the apollo then they visit the karna. If someone expire the jolynn and they are not armorial then the jolynn antique the che. If someone realise the karna and they do not visit the che then the karna realise the jolynn. The jolynn antique the karna.", "logic": "\nStraggling(jolynn)\nImpervious(karna)\nAntique(che, apollo)\nExpire(apollo, che)\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) -> not Peppery(x))\nAntique(karna, apollo) and Expire(karna, apollo) -> Expire(karna, jolynn)\nforall x (Straggling(x) -> Antique(x, che))\nforall x (Expire(x, karna) and not Armorial(x) -> not Vulnerable(karna))\nforall x (Antique(x, che) -> Straggling(che))\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) and not Expire(x, apollo) -> Antique(x, karna))\nforall x (Expire(x, jolynn) and not Armorial(x) -> Antique(jolynn, che))\nforall x (Realise(x, karna) and not Antique(x, che) -> Realise(karna, jolynn))\n\nAntique(jolynn, karna)\n\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) and not Expire(x, apollo) -> Antique(x, karna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The rora is babelike. The gipsy is gaudy. The cheryl traumatize the rosy. The rosy alkalize the cheryl. Cold people are not parentless. If the gipsy traumatize the rosy and the gipsy alkalize the rosy then the gipsy alkalize the rora. If someone is babelike then they visit the cheryl. If someone alkalize the gipsy and they are not parlous then the gipsy is not anatomical. If someone traumatize the cheryl then the cheryl is babelike. If someone is anatomical and they do not like the rosy then they visit the gipsy. If someone alkalize the rora and they are not parlous then the rora traumatize the cheryl. If someone bandage the gipsy and they do not visit the cheryl then the gipsy bandage the rora. The rora does not like the rosy.", "logic": "\nBabelike(rora)\nGaudy(gipsy)\nTraumatize(cheryl, rosy)\nAlkalize(rosy, cheryl)\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> not Parentless(x))\nTraumatize(gipsy, rosy) and Alkalize(gipsy, rosy) -> Alkalize(gipsy, rora)\nforall x (Babelike(x) -> Traumatize(x, cheryl))\nforall x (Alkalize(x, gipsy) and not Parlous(x) -> not Anatomical(gipsy))\nforall x (Traumatize(x, cheryl) -> Babelike(cheryl))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) and not Alkalize(x, rosy) -> Traumatize(x, gipsy))\nforall x (Alkalize(x, rora) and not Parlous(x) -> Traumatize(rora, cheryl))\nforall x (Bandage(x, gipsy) and not Traumatize(x, cheryl) -> Bandage(gipsy, rora))\n\nnot Alkalize(rora, rosy)\n\nnot Alkalize(rora, rosy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The rafael is revokable. The emiline is finicky. The mic tumesce the horace. The horace reaffirm the mic. Cold people are not fragmental. If the emiline tumesce the horace and the emiline reaffirm the horace then the emiline reaffirm the rafael. If someone is revokable then they visit the mic. If someone reaffirm the emiline and they are not capitulary then the emiline is not judicial. If someone tumesce the mic then the mic is revokable. If someone is judicial and they do not like the horace then they visit the emiline. If someone reaffirm the rafael and they are not capitulary then the rafael tumesce the mic. If someone careen the emiline and they do not visit the mic then the emiline careen the rafael. The horace tumesce the horace.", "logic": "\nRevokable(rafael)\nFinicky(emiline)\nTumesce(mic, horace)\nReaffirm(horace, mic)\nforall x (Judicial(x) -> not Fragmental(x))\nTumesce(emiline, horace) and Reaffirm(emiline, horace) -> Reaffirm(emiline, rafael)\nforall x (Revokable(x) -> Tumesce(x, mic))\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, emiline) and not Capitulary(x) -> not Judicial(emiline))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, mic) -> Revokable(mic))\nforall x (Judicial(x) and not Reaffirm(x, horace) -> Tumesce(x, emiline))\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, rafael) and not Capitulary(x) -> Tumesce(rafael, mic))\nforall x (Careen(x, emiline) and not Tumesce(x, mic) -> Careen(emiline, rafael))\n\nTumesce(horace, horace)\n\nTumesce(horace, horace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The felicio is podgy. The anatol is frivolous. The helyn intermix the ceciley. The ceciley ticktock the helyn. Cold people are not spirant. If the anatol intermix the ceciley and the anatol ticktock the ceciley then the anatol ticktock the felicio. If someone is podgy then they visit the helyn. If someone ticktock the anatol and they are not bowed then the anatol is not stressed. If someone intermix the helyn then the helyn is podgy. If someone is stressed and they do not like the ceciley then they visit the anatol. If someone ticktock the felicio and they are not bowed then the felicio intermix the helyn. If someone unbar the anatol and they do not visit the helyn then the anatol unbar the felicio. The helyn does not see the helyn.", "logic": "\nPodgy(felicio)\nFrivolous(anatol)\nIntermix(helyn, ceciley)\nTicktock(ceciley, helyn)\nforall x (Stressed(x) -> not Spirant(x))\nIntermix(anatol, ceciley) and Ticktock(anatol, ceciley) -> Ticktock(anatol, felicio)\nforall x (Podgy(x) -> Intermix(x, helyn))\nforall x (Ticktock(x, anatol) and not Bowed(x) -> not Stressed(anatol))\nforall x (Intermix(x, helyn) -> Podgy(helyn))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and not Ticktock(x, ceciley) -> Intermix(x, anatol))\nforall x (Ticktock(x, felicio) and not Bowed(x) -> Intermix(felicio, helyn))\nforall x (Unbar(x, anatol) and not Intermix(x, helyn) -> Unbar(anatol, felicio))\n\nnot Unbar(helyn, helyn)\n\nnot Unbar(helyn, helyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The robbie is damascene. The shurwood is rescued. The lainey crowd the rees. The rees waddle the lainey. Cold people are not monarchal. If the shurwood crowd the rees and the shurwood waddle the rees then the shurwood waddle the robbie. If someone is damascene then they visit the lainey. If someone waddle the shurwood and they are not overlarge then the shurwood is not laughing. If someone crowd the lainey then the lainey is damascene. If someone is laughing and they do not like the rees then they visit the shurwood. If someone waddle the robbie and they are not overlarge then the robbie crowd the lainey. If someone erect the shurwood and they do not visit the lainey then the shurwood erect the robbie. The shurwood waddle the shurwood.", "logic": "\nDamascene(robbie)\nRescued(shurwood)\nCrowd(lainey, rees)\nWaddle(rees, lainey)\nforall x (Laughing(x) -> not Monarchal(x))\nCrowd(shurwood, rees) and Waddle(shurwood, rees) -> Waddle(shurwood, robbie)\nforall x (Damascene(x) -> Crowd(x, lainey))\nforall x (Waddle(x, shurwood) and not Overlarge(x) -> not Laughing(shurwood))\nforall x (Crowd(x, lainey) -> Damascene(lainey))\nforall x (Laughing(x) and not Waddle(x, rees) -> Crowd(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Waddle(x, robbie) and not Overlarge(x) -> Crowd(robbie, lainey))\nforall x (Erect(x, shurwood) and not Crowd(x, lainey) -> Erect(shurwood, robbie))\n\nWaddle(shurwood, shurwood)\n\nWaddle(shurwood, shurwood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The brittan narrate the danette. The brittan ablate the danette. The danette ablate the brittan. If someone is detached then they like the danette. If someone is epistemic then they eat the brittan. If someone ablate the danette then the danette is detached. If someone ablate the danette and they are unsuited then the danette yarn the brittan. If someone narrate the danette then they are epistemic. If the danette yarn the brittan and the brittan is not scrubbed then the brittan is epistemic. If someone narrate the brittan then they visit the brittan. If the danette is epistemic then the danette ablate the brittan. The brittan narrate the danette.", "logic": "\nNarrate(brittan, danette)\nAblate(brittan, danette)\nAblate(danette, brittan)\nforall x (Detached(x) -> Ablate(x, danette))\nforall x (Epistemic(x) -> Narrate(x, brittan))\nforall x (Ablate(x, danette) -> Detached(danette))\nforall x (Ablate(x, danette) and Unsuited(x) -> Yarn(danette, brittan))\nforall x (Narrate(x, danette) -> Epistemic(x))\nYarn(danette, brittan) and not Scrubbed(brittan) -> Epistemic(brittan)\nforall x (Narrate(x, brittan) -> Yarn(x, brittan))\nEpistemic(danette) -> Ablate(danette, brittan)\n\nNarrate(brittan, danette)\n\ntherefore Narrate(brittan, danette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The peggi manage the quintin. The peggi buff the quintin. The quintin buff the peggi. If someone is tibial then they like the quintin. If someone is eased then they eat the peggi. If someone buff the quintin then the quintin is tibial. If someone buff the quintin and they are daredevil then the quintin shorten the peggi. If someone manage the quintin then they are eased. If the quintin shorten the peggi and the peggi is not gladdened then the peggi is eased. If someone manage the peggi then they visit the peggi. If the quintin is eased then the quintin buff the peggi. The quintin does not like the peggi.", "logic": "\nManage(peggi, quintin)\nBuff(peggi, quintin)\nBuff(quintin, peggi)\nforall x (Tibial(x) -> Buff(x, quintin))\nforall x (Eased(x) -> Manage(x, peggi))\nforall x (Buff(x, quintin) -> Tibial(quintin))\nforall x (Buff(x, quintin) and Daredevil(x) -> Shorten(quintin, peggi))\nforall x (Manage(x, quintin) -> Eased(x))\nShorten(quintin, peggi) and not Gladdened(peggi) -> Eased(peggi)\nforall x (Manage(x, peggi) -> Shorten(x, peggi))\nEased(quintin) -> Buff(quintin, peggi)\n\nnot Buff(quintin, peggi)\n\ntherefore Buff(quintin, peggi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The taddeus lower the dena. The taddeus pore the dena. The dena pore the taddeus. If someone is leftover then they like the dena. If someone is absolute then they eat the taddeus. If someone pore the dena then the dena is leftover. If someone pore the dena and they are dormie then the dena allege the taddeus. If someone lower the dena then they are absolute. If the dena allege the taddeus and the taddeus is not garmented then the taddeus is absolute. If someone lower the taddeus then they visit the taddeus. If the dena is absolute then the dena pore the taddeus. The taddeus is absolute.", "logic": "\nLower(taddeus, dena)\nPore(taddeus, dena)\nPore(dena, taddeus)\nforall x (Leftover(x) -> Pore(x, dena))\nforall x (Absolute(x) -> Lower(x, taddeus))\nforall x (Pore(x, dena) -> Leftover(dena))\nforall x (Pore(x, dena) and Dormie(x) -> Allege(dena, taddeus))\nforall x (Lower(x, dena) -> Absolute(x))\nAllege(dena, taddeus) and not Garmented(taddeus) -> Absolute(taddeus)\nforall x (Lower(x, taddeus) -> Allege(x, taddeus))\nAbsolute(dena) -> Pore(dena, taddeus)\n\nAbsolute(taddeus)\n\nLower(taddeus, dena) and forall x (Lower(x, dena) -> Absolute(x)) -> therefore Absolute(taddeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The travers conceal the rodi. The travers deluge the rodi. The rodi deluge the travers. If someone is roofless then they like the rodi. If someone is faulty then they eat the travers. If someone deluge the rodi then the rodi is roofless. If someone deluge the rodi and they are curt then the rodi subside the travers. If someone conceal the rodi then they are faulty. If the rodi subside the travers and the travers is not definable then the travers is faulty. If someone conceal the travers then they visit the travers. If the rodi is faulty then the rodi deluge the travers. The rodi is not roofless.", "logic": "\nConceal(travers, rodi)\nDeluge(travers, rodi)\nDeluge(rodi, travers)\nforall x (Roofless(x) -> Deluge(x, rodi))\nforall x (Faulty(x) -> Conceal(x, travers))\nforall x (Deluge(x, rodi) -> Roofless(rodi))\nforall x (Deluge(x, rodi) and Curt(x) -> Subside(rodi, travers))\nforall x (Conceal(x, rodi) -> Faulty(x))\nSubside(rodi, travers) and not Definable(travers) -> Faulty(travers)\nforall x (Conceal(x, travers) -> Subside(x, travers))\nFaulty(rodi) -> Deluge(rodi, travers)\n\nnot Roofless(rodi)\n\nDeluge(travers, rodi) and forall x (Deluge(x, rodi) -> Roofless(rodi)) -> therefore Roofless(rodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The phoebe quieten the randall. The phoebe intone the randall. The randall intone the phoebe. If someone is thickening then they like the randall. If someone is blackened then they eat the phoebe. If someone intone the randall then the randall is thickening. If someone intone the randall and they are poetical then the randall canter the phoebe. If someone quieten the randall then they are blackened. If the randall canter the phoebe and the phoebe is not political then the phoebe is blackened. If someone quieten the phoebe then they visit the phoebe. If the randall is blackened then the randall intone the phoebe. The randall intone the randall.", "logic": "\nQuieten(phoebe, randall)\nIntone(phoebe, randall)\nIntone(randall, phoebe)\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Intone(x, randall))\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Quieten(x, phoebe))\nforall x (Intone(x, randall) -> Thickening(randall))\nforall x (Intone(x, randall) and Poetical(x) -> Canter(randall, phoebe))\nforall x (Quieten(x, randall) -> Blackened(x))\nCanter(randall, phoebe) and not Political(phoebe) -> Blackened(phoebe)\nforall x (Quieten(x, phoebe) -> Canter(x, phoebe))\nBlackened(randall) -> Intone(randall, phoebe)\n\nIntone(randall, randall)\n\nIntone(phoebe, randall) and forall x (Intone(x, randall) -> Thickening(randall)) -> therefore Thickening(randall) Thickening(randall) and forall x (Thickening(x) -> Intone(x, randall)) -> therefore Intone(randall, randall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The fionna bell the rosanne. The fionna reflate the rosanne. The rosanne reflate the fionna. If someone is villainous then they like the rosanne. If someone is voteless then they eat the fionna. If someone reflate the rosanne then the rosanne is villainous. If someone reflate the rosanne and they are absorbing then the rosanne iron the fionna. If someone bell the rosanne then they are voteless. If the rosanne iron the fionna and the fionna is not ovine then the fionna is voteless. If someone bell the fionna then they visit the fionna. If the rosanne is voteless then the rosanne reflate the fionna. The fionna does not eat the fionna.", "logic": "\nBell(fionna, rosanne)\nReflate(fionna, rosanne)\nReflate(rosanne, fionna)\nforall x (Villainous(x) -> Reflate(x, rosanne))\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Bell(x, fionna))\nforall x (Reflate(x, rosanne) -> Villainous(rosanne))\nforall x (Reflate(x, rosanne) and Absorbing(x) -> Iron(rosanne, fionna))\nforall x (Bell(x, rosanne) -> Voteless(x))\nIron(rosanne, fionna) and not Ovine(fionna) -> Voteless(fionna)\nforall x (Bell(x, fionna) -> Iron(x, fionna))\nVoteless(rosanne) -> Reflate(rosanne, fionna)\n\nnot Bell(fionna, fionna)\n\nBell(fionna, rosanne) and forall x (Bell(x, rosanne) -> Voteless(x)) -> therefore Voteless(fionna) Voteless(fionna) and forall x (Voteless(x) -> Bell(x, fionna)) -> therefore Bell(fionna, fionna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The hadria snub the georg. The hadria classify the georg. The georg classify the hadria. If someone is mutilated then they like the georg. If someone is ascendible then they eat the hadria. If someone classify the georg then the georg is mutilated. If someone classify the georg and they are tallish then the georg spur the hadria. If someone snub the georg then they are ascendible. If the georg spur the hadria and the hadria is not randy then the hadria is ascendible. If someone snub the hadria then they visit the hadria. If the georg is ascendible then the georg classify the hadria. The hadria spur the hadria.", "logic": "\nSnub(hadria, georg)\nClassify(hadria, georg)\nClassify(georg, hadria)\nforall x (Mutilated(x) -> Classify(x, georg))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) -> Snub(x, hadria))\nforall x (Classify(x, georg) -> Mutilated(georg))\nforall x (Classify(x, georg) and Tallish(x) -> Spur(georg, hadria))\nforall x (Snub(x, georg) -> Ascendible(x))\nSpur(georg, hadria) and not Randy(hadria) -> Ascendible(hadria)\nforall x (Snub(x, hadria) -> Spur(x, hadria))\nAscendible(georg) -> Classify(georg, hadria)\n\nSpur(hadria, hadria)\n\nSnub(hadria, georg) and forall x (Snub(x, georg) -> Ascendible(x)) -> therefore Ascendible(hadria) Ascendible(hadria) and forall x (Ascendible(x) -> Snub(x, hadria)) -> therefore Snub(hadria, hadria) Snub(hadria, hadria) and forall x (Snub(x, hadria) -> Spur(x, hadria)) -> therefore Spur(hadria, hadria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The odelia waitress the horst. The odelia paginate the horst. The horst paginate the odelia. If someone is polynesian then they like the horst. If someone is scoreless then they eat the odelia. If someone paginate the horst then the horst is polynesian. If someone paginate the horst and they are monarchal then the horst detract the odelia. If someone waitress the horst then they are scoreless. If the horst detract the odelia and the odelia is not officious then the odelia is scoreless. If someone waitress the odelia then they visit the odelia. If the horst is scoreless then the horst paginate the odelia. The odelia does not visit the odelia.", "logic": "\nWaitress(odelia, horst)\nPaginate(odelia, horst)\nPaginate(horst, odelia)\nforall x (Polynesian(x) -> Paginate(x, horst))\nforall x (Scoreless(x) -> Waitress(x, odelia))\nforall x (Paginate(x, horst) -> Polynesian(horst))\nforall x (Paginate(x, horst) and Monarchal(x) -> Detract(horst, odelia))\nforall x (Waitress(x, horst) -> Scoreless(x))\nDetract(horst, odelia) and not Officious(odelia) -> Scoreless(odelia)\nforall x (Waitress(x, odelia) -> Detract(x, odelia))\nScoreless(horst) -> Paginate(horst, odelia)\n\nnot Detract(odelia, odelia)\n\nWaitress(odelia, horst) and forall x (Waitress(x, horst) -> Scoreless(x)) -> therefore Scoreless(odelia) Scoreless(odelia) and forall x (Scoreless(x) -> Waitress(x, odelia)) -> therefore Waitress(odelia, odelia) Waitress(odelia, odelia) and forall x (Waitress(x, odelia) -> Detract(x, odelia)) -> therefore Detract(odelia, odelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The welby atomize the maiga. The welby persist the maiga. The maiga persist the welby. If someone is unmanful then they like the maiga. If someone is prolusory then they eat the welby. If someone persist the maiga then the maiga is unmanful. If someone persist the maiga and they are giving then the maiga shepherd the welby. If someone atomize the maiga then they are prolusory. If the maiga shepherd the welby and the welby is not compounded then the welby is prolusory. If someone atomize the welby then they visit the welby. If the maiga is prolusory then the maiga persist the welby. The maiga is not prolusory.", "logic": "\nAtomize(welby, maiga)\nPersist(welby, maiga)\nPersist(maiga, welby)\nforall x (Unmanful(x) -> Persist(x, maiga))\nforall x (Prolusory(x) -> Atomize(x, welby))\nforall x (Persist(x, maiga) -> Unmanful(maiga))\nforall x (Persist(x, maiga) and Giving(x) -> Shepherd(maiga, welby))\nforall x (Atomize(x, maiga) -> Prolusory(x))\nShepherd(maiga, welby) and not Compounded(welby) -> Prolusory(welby)\nforall x (Atomize(x, welby) -> Shepherd(x, welby))\nProlusory(maiga) -> Persist(maiga, welby)\n\nnot Prolusory(maiga)\n\nforall x (Atomize(x, maiga) -> Prolusory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The rem tinkle the tomas. The rem outpace the tomas. The tomas outpace the rem. If someone is devout then they like the tomas. If someone is unbeloved then they eat the rem. If someone outpace the tomas then the tomas is devout. If someone outpace the tomas and they are sneaky then the tomas torch the rem. If someone tinkle the tomas then they are unbeloved. If the tomas torch the rem and the rem is not biloculate then the rem is unbeloved. If someone tinkle the rem then they visit the rem. If the tomas is unbeloved then the tomas outpace the rem. The tomas tinkle the rem.", "logic": "\nTinkle(rem, tomas)\nOutpace(rem, tomas)\nOutpace(tomas, rem)\nforall x (Devout(x) -> Outpace(x, tomas))\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) -> Tinkle(x, rem))\nforall x (Outpace(x, tomas) -> Devout(tomas))\nforall x (Outpace(x, tomas) and Sneaky(x) -> Torch(tomas, rem))\nforall x (Tinkle(x, tomas) -> Unbeloved(x))\nTorch(tomas, rem) and not Biloculate(rem) -> Unbeloved(rem)\nforall x (Tinkle(x, rem) -> Torch(x, rem))\nUnbeloved(tomas) -> Outpace(tomas, rem)\n\nTinkle(tomas, rem)\n\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) -> Tinkle(x, rem)) <- forall x (Tinkle(x, tomas) -> Unbeloved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The cosetta abstain the fernando. The cosetta whirl the fernando. The fernando whirl the cosetta. If someone is azimuthal then they like the fernando. If someone is faultless then they eat the cosetta. If someone whirl the fernando then the fernando is azimuthal. If someone whirl the fernando and they are scowling then the fernando nett the cosetta. If someone abstain the fernando then they are faultless. If the fernando nett the cosetta and the cosetta is not laudatory then the cosetta is faultless. If someone abstain the cosetta then they visit the cosetta. If the fernando is faultless then the fernando whirl the cosetta. The fernando does not visit the cosetta.", "logic": "\nAbstain(cosetta, fernando)\nWhirl(cosetta, fernando)\nWhirl(fernando, cosetta)\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) -> Whirl(x, fernando))\nforall x (Faultless(x) -> Abstain(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Whirl(x, fernando) -> Azimuthal(fernando))\nforall x (Whirl(x, fernando) and Scowling(x) -> Nett(fernando, cosetta))\nforall x (Abstain(x, fernando) -> Faultless(x))\nNett(fernando, cosetta) and not Laudatory(cosetta) -> Faultless(cosetta)\nforall x (Abstain(x, cosetta) -> Nett(x, cosetta))\nFaultless(fernando) -> Whirl(fernando, cosetta)\n\nnot Nett(fernando, cosetta)\n\nforall x (Abstain(x, cosetta) -> Nett(x, cosetta)) <- forall x (Faultless(x) -> Abstain(x, cosetta)) <- forall x (Abstain(x, fernando) -> Faultless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The oren grass the kristina. The oren censure the kristina. The kristina censure the oren. If someone is painful then they like the kristina. If someone is drafty then they eat the oren. If someone censure the kristina then the kristina is painful. If someone censure the kristina and they are fourth then the kristina pounce the oren. If someone grass the kristina then they are drafty. If the kristina pounce the oren and the oren is not obese then the oren is drafty. If someone grass the oren then they visit the oren. If the kristina is drafty then the kristina censure the oren. The oren censure the oren.", "logic": "\nGrass(oren, kristina)\nCensure(oren, kristina)\nCensure(kristina, oren)\nforall x (Painful(x) -> Censure(x, kristina))\nforall x (Drafty(x) -> Grass(x, oren))\nforall x (Censure(x, kristina) -> Painful(kristina))\nforall x (Censure(x, kristina) and Fourth(x) -> Pounce(kristina, oren))\nforall x (Grass(x, kristina) -> Drafty(x))\nPounce(kristina, oren) and not Obese(oren) -> Drafty(oren)\nforall x (Grass(x, oren) -> Pounce(x, oren))\nDrafty(kristina) -> Censure(kristina, oren)\n\nCensure(oren, oren)\n\nCensure(oren, oren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The audy motorcycle the garrett. The audy besprinkle the garrett. The garrett besprinkle the audy. If someone is correlate then they like the garrett. If someone is first then they eat the audy. If someone besprinkle the garrett then the garrett is correlate. If someone besprinkle the garrett and they are unreactive then the garrett mess the audy. If someone motorcycle the garrett then they are first. If the garrett mess the audy and the audy is not phalangeal then the audy is first. If someone motorcycle the audy then they visit the audy. If the garrett is first then the garrett besprinkle the audy. The audy is not phalangeal.", "logic": "\nMotorcycle(audy, garrett)\nBesprinkle(audy, garrett)\nBesprinkle(garrett, audy)\nforall x (Correlate(x) -> Besprinkle(x, garrett))\nforall x (First(x) -> Motorcycle(x, audy))\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, garrett) -> Correlate(garrett))\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, garrett) and Unreactive(x) -> Mess(garrett, audy))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, garrett) -> First(x))\nMess(garrett, audy) and not Phalangeal(audy) -> First(audy)\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, audy) -> Mess(x, audy))\nFirst(garrett) -> Besprinkle(garrett, audy)\n\nnot Phalangeal(audy)\n\nnot Phalangeal(audy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The betteann habit the binni. The betteann revolve the binni. The binni revolve the betteann. If someone is faint then they like the binni. If someone is knotted then they eat the betteann. If someone revolve the binni then the binni is faint. If someone revolve the binni and they are trembling then the binni pulse the betteann. If someone habit the binni then they are knotted. If the binni pulse the betteann and the betteann is not weary then the betteann is knotted. If someone habit the betteann then they visit the betteann. If the binni is knotted then the binni revolve the betteann. The binni habit the binni.", "logic": "\nHabit(betteann, binni)\nRevolve(betteann, binni)\nRevolve(binni, betteann)\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Revolve(x, binni))\nforall x (Knotted(x) -> Habit(x, betteann))\nforall x (Revolve(x, binni) -> Faint(binni))\nforall x (Revolve(x, binni) and Trembling(x) -> Pulse(binni, betteann))\nforall x (Habit(x, binni) -> Knotted(x))\nPulse(binni, betteann) and not Weary(betteann) -> Knotted(betteann)\nforall x (Habit(x, betteann) -> Pulse(x, betteann))\nKnotted(binni) -> Revolve(binni, betteann)\n\nHabit(binni, binni)\n\nHabit(binni, binni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The laurice predecease the sarine. The laurice decussate the sarine. The sarine decussate the laurice. If someone is clever then they like the sarine. If someone is diachronic then they eat the laurice. If someone decussate the sarine then the sarine is clever. If someone decussate the sarine and they are suchlike then the sarine christen the laurice. If someone predecease the sarine then they are diachronic. If the sarine christen the laurice and the laurice is not greenside then the laurice is diachronic. If someone predecease the laurice then they visit the laurice. If the sarine is diachronic then the sarine decussate the laurice. The laurice does not visit the sarine.", "logic": "\nPredecease(laurice, sarine)\nDecussate(laurice, sarine)\nDecussate(sarine, laurice)\nforall x (Clever(x) -> Decussate(x, sarine))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) -> Predecease(x, laurice))\nforall x (Decussate(x, sarine) -> Clever(sarine))\nforall x (Decussate(x, sarine) and Suchlike(x) -> Christen(sarine, laurice))\nforall x (Predecease(x, sarine) -> Diachronic(x))\nChristen(sarine, laurice) and not Greenside(laurice) -> Diachronic(laurice)\nforall x (Predecease(x, laurice) -> Christen(x, laurice))\nDiachronic(sarine) -> Decussate(sarine, laurice)\n\nnot Christen(laurice, sarine)\n\nnot Christen(laurice, sarine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The hank gird the kim. The hank party the kim. The kim party the hank. If someone is twiggy then they like the kim. If someone is urogenital then they eat the hank. If someone party the kim then the kim is twiggy. If someone party the kim and they are dripless then the kim brad the hank. If someone gird the kim then they are urogenital. If the kim brad the hank and the hank is not climatical then the hank is urogenital. If someone gird the hank then they visit the hank. If the kim is urogenital then the kim party the hank. The hank is twiggy.", "logic": "\nGird(hank, kim)\nParty(hank, kim)\nParty(kim, hank)\nforall x (Twiggy(x) -> Party(x, kim))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Gird(x, hank))\nforall x (Party(x, kim) -> Twiggy(kim))\nforall x (Party(x, kim) and Dripless(x) -> Brad(kim, hank))\nforall x (Gird(x, kim) -> Urogenital(x))\nBrad(kim, hank) and not Climatical(hank) -> Urogenital(hank)\nforall x (Gird(x, hank) -> Brad(x, hank))\nUrogenital(kim) -> Party(kim, hank)\n\nTwiggy(hank)\n\nTwiggy(hank) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The yves is canted. The yves is governable. The yves fright the sonni. The yves fright the meagan. The sonni cronk the meagan. The sonni is canted. The sonni is governable. The meagan cronk the sonni. The meagan cronk the casi. The casi cronk the sonni. The casi relocate the yves. The casi relocate the meagan. If the casi is governable and the casi relocate the meagan then the meagan relocate the casi. If someone fright the meagan and the meagan is netted then the meagan is subduable. If the meagan relocate the casi and the meagan relocate the sonni then the meagan cronk the sonni. If the casi relocate the meagan and the casi is subduable then the casi is governable. If the casi is basilary and the casi cronk the yves then the casi cronk the sonni. If someone cronk the casi then they see the sonni. If someone cronk the yves then they like the sonni. If someone relocate the yves then they are subduable. The yves fright the sonni.", "logic": "\nCanted(yves)\nGovernable(yves)\nFright(yves, sonni)\nFright(yves, meagan)\nCronk(sonni, meagan)\nCanted(sonni)\nGovernable(sonni)\nCronk(meagan, sonni)\nCronk(meagan, casi)\nCronk(casi, sonni)\nRelocate(casi, yves)\nRelocate(casi, meagan)\nGovernable(casi) and Relocate(casi, meagan) -> Relocate(meagan, casi)\nforall x (Fright(x, meagan) and Netted(meagan) -> Subduable(meagan))\nRelocate(meagan, casi) and Relocate(meagan, sonni) -> Cronk(meagan, sonni)\nRelocate(casi, meagan) and Subduable(casi) -> Governable(casi)\nBasilary(casi) and Cronk(casi, yves) -> Cronk(casi, sonni)\nforall x (Cronk(x, casi) -> Fright(x, sonni))\nforall x (Cronk(x, yves) -> Relocate(x, sonni))\nforall x (Relocate(x, yves) -> Subduable(x))\n\nFright(yves, sonni)\n\ntherefore Fright(yves, sonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The thaddus is terrified. The thaddus is compulsory. The thaddus foresee the shantee. The thaddus foresee the zachariah. The shantee rubberize the zachariah. The shantee is terrified. The shantee is compulsory. The zachariah rubberize the shantee. The zachariah rubberize the meg. The meg rubberize the shantee. The meg rouse the thaddus. The meg rouse the zachariah. If the meg is compulsory and the meg rouse the zachariah then the zachariah rouse the meg. If someone foresee the zachariah and the zachariah is mute then the zachariah is oversea. If the zachariah rouse the meg and the zachariah rouse the shantee then the zachariah rubberize the shantee. If the meg rouse the zachariah and the meg is oversea then the meg is compulsory. If the meg is monoicous and the meg rubberize the thaddus then the meg rubberize the shantee. If someone rubberize the meg then they see the shantee. If someone rubberize the thaddus then they like the shantee. If someone rouse the thaddus then they are oversea. The thaddus does not see the zachariah.", "logic": "\nTerrified(thaddus)\nCompulsory(thaddus)\nForesee(thaddus, shantee)\nForesee(thaddus, zachariah)\nRubberize(shantee, zachariah)\nTerrified(shantee)\nCompulsory(shantee)\nRubberize(zachariah, shantee)\nRubberize(zachariah, meg)\nRubberize(meg, shantee)\nRouse(meg, thaddus)\nRouse(meg, zachariah)\nCompulsory(meg) and Rouse(meg, zachariah) -> Rouse(zachariah, meg)\nforall x (Foresee(x, zachariah) and Mute(zachariah) -> Oversea(zachariah))\nRouse(zachariah, meg) and Rouse(zachariah, shantee) -> Rubberize(zachariah, shantee)\nRouse(meg, zachariah) and Oversea(meg) -> Compulsory(meg)\nMonoicous(meg) and Rubberize(meg, thaddus) -> Rubberize(meg, shantee)\nforall x (Rubberize(x, meg) -> Foresee(x, shantee))\nforall x (Rubberize(x, thaddus) -> Rouse(x, shantee))\nforall x (Rouse(x, thaddus) -> Oversea(x))\n\nnot Foresee(thaddus, zachariah)\n\ntherefore Foresee(thaddus, zachariah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The selia is liquescent. The selia is awninged. The selia nose the lissy. The selia nose the dory. The lissy bowdlerise the dory. The lissy is liquescent. The lissy is awninged. The dory bowdlerise the lissy. The dory bowdlerise the raf. The raf bowdlerise the lissy. The raf stain the selia. The raf stain the dory. If the raf is awninged and the raf stain the dory then the dory stain the raf. If someone nose the dory and the dory is salientian then the dory is apolitical. If the dory stain the raf and the dory stain the lissy then the dory bowdlerise the lissy. If the raf stain the dory and the raf is apolitical then the raf is awninged. If the raf is additional and the raf bowdlerise the selia then the raf bowdlerise the lissy. If someone bowdlerise the raf then they see the lissy. If someone bowdlerise the selia then they like the lissy. If someone stain the selia then they are apolitical. The dory nose the lissy.", "logic": "\nLiquescent(selia)\nAwninged(selia)\nNose(selia, lissy)\nNose(selia, dory)\nBowdlerise(lissy, dory)\nLiquescent(lissy)\nAwninged(lissy)\nBowdlerise(dory, lissy)\nBowdlerise(dory, raf)\nBowdlerise(raf, lissy)\nStain(raf, selia)\nStain(raf, dory)\nAwninged(raf) and Stain(raf, dory) -> Stain(dory, raf)\nforall x (Nose(x, dory) and Salientian(dory) -> Apolitical(dory))\nStain(dory, raf) and Stain(dory, lissy) -> Bowdlerise(dory, lissy)\nStain(raf, dory) and Apolitical(raf) -> Awninged(raf)\nAdditional(raf) and Bowdlerise(raf, selia) -> Bowdlerise(raf, lissy)\nforall x (Bowdlerise(x, raf) -> Nose(x, lissy))\nforall x (Bowdlerise(x, selia) -> Stain(x, lissy))\nforall x (Stain(x, selia) -> Apolitical(x))\n\nNose(dory, lissy)\n\nBowdlerise(dory, raf) and forall x (Bowdlerise(x, raf) -> Nose(x, lissy)) -> therefore Nose(dory, lissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The hashim is nuptial. The hashim is nigerian. The hashim trill the barri. The hashim trill the westbrook. The barri partition the westbrook. The barri is nuptial. The barri is nigerian. The westbrook partition the barri. The westbrook partition the gifford. The gifford partition the barri. The gifford grace the hashim. The gifford grace the westbrook. If the gifford is nigerian and the gifford grace the westbrook then the westbrook grace the gifford. If someone trill the westbrook and the westbrook is finnish then the westbrook is unshorn. If the westbrook grace the gifford and the westbrook grace the barri then the westbrook partition the barri. If the gifford grace the westbrook and the gifford is unshorn then the gifford is nigerian. If the gifford is baculiform and the gifford partition the hashim then the gifford partition the barri. If someone partition the gifford then they see the barri. If someone partition the hashim then they like the barri. If someone grace the hashim then they are unshorn. The gifford is not unshorn.", "logic": "\nNuptial(hashim)\nNigerian(hashim)\nTrill(hashim, barri)\nTrill(hashim, westbrook)\nPartition(barri, westbrook)\nNuptial(barri)\nNigerian(barri)\nPartition(westbrook, barri)\nPartition(westbrook, gifford)\nPartition(gifford, barri)\nGrace(gifford, hashim)\nGrace(gifford, westbrook)\nNigerian(gifford) and Grace(gifford, westbrook) -> Grace(westbrook, gifford)\nforall x (Trill(x, westbrook) and Finnish(westbrook) -> Unshorn(westbrook))\nGrace(westbrook, gifford) and Grace(westbrook, barri) -> Partition(westbrook, barri)\nGrace(gifford, westbrook) and Unshorn(gifford) -> Nigerian(gifford)\nBaculiform(gifford) and Partition(gifford, hashim) -> Partition(gifford, barri)\nforall x (Partition(x, gifford) -> Trill(x, barri))\nforall x (Partition(x, hashim) -> Grace(x, barri))\nforall x (Grace(x, hashim) -> Unshorn(x))\n\nnot Unshorn(gifford)\n\nGrace(gifford, hashim) and forall x (Grace(x, hashim) -> Unshorn(x)) -> therefore Unshorn(gifford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The paton is expiratory. The paton is pedal. The paton demand the quint. The paton demand the crista. The quint rendezvous the crista. The quint is expiratory. The quint is pedal. The crista rendezvous the quint. The crista rendezvous the amalita. The amalita rendezvous the quint. The amalita fetishize the paton. The amalita fetishize the crista. If the amalita is pedal and the amalita fetishize the crista then the crista fetishize the amalita. If someone demand the crista and the crista is dolorous then the crista is fugly. If the crista fetishize the amalita and the crista fetishize the quint then the crista rendezvous the quint. If the amalita fetishize the crista and the amalita is fugly then the amalita is pedal. If the amalita is stillborn and the amalita rendezvous the paton then the amalita rendezvous the quint. If someone rendezvous the amalita then they see the quint. If someone rendezvous the paton then they like the quint. If someone fetishize the paton then they are fugly. The amalita is pedal.", "logic": "\nExpiratory(paton)\nPedal(paton)\nDemand(paton, quint)\nDemand(paton, crista)\nRendezvous(quint, crista)\nExpiratory(quint)\nPedal(quint)\nRendezvous(crista, quint)\nRendezvous(crista, amalita)\nRendezvous(amalita, quint)\nFetishize(amalita, paton)\nFetishize(amalita, crista)\nPedal(amalita) and Fetishize(amalita, crista) -> Fetishize(crista, amalita)\nforall x (Demand(x, crista) and Dolorous(crista) -> Fugly(crista))\nFetishize(crista, amalita) and Fetishize(crista, quint) -> Rendezvous(crista, quint)\nFetishize(amalita, crista) and Fugly(amalita) -> Pedal(amalita)\nStillborn(amalita) and Rendezvous(amalita, paton) -> Rendezvous(amalita, quint)\nforall x (Rendezvous(x, amalita) -> Demand(x, quint))\nforall x (Rendezvous(x, paton) -> Fetishize(x, quint))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, paton) -> Fugly(x))\n\nPedal(amalita)\n\nFetishize(amalita, paton) and forall x (Fetishize(x, paton) -> Fugly(x)) -> therefore Fugly(amalita) Fetishize(amalita, crista) and Fugly(amalita) and Fetishize(amalita, crista) and Fugly(amalita) -> Pedal(amalita) -> therefore Pedal(amalita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The ernaline is unsavoury. The ernaline is rational. The ernaline package the jordan. The ernaline package the robbie. The jordan daub the robbie. The jordan is unsavoury. The jordan is rational. The robbie daub the jordan. The robbie daub the emmalyn. The emmalyn daub the jordan. The emmalyn crack the ernaline. The emmalyn crack the robbie. If the emmalyn is rational and the emmalyn crack the robbie then the robbie crack the emmalyn. If someone package the robbie and the robbie is proustian then the robbie is xxix. If the robbie crack the emmalyn and the robbie crack the jordan then the robbie daub the jordan. If the emmalyn crack the robbie and the emmalyn is xxix then the emmalyn is rational. If the emmalyn is greased and the emmalyn daub the ernaline then the emmalyn daub the jordan. If someone daub the emmalyn then they see the jordan. If someone daub the ernaline then they like the jordan. If someone crack the ernaline then they are xxix. The emmalyn is not rational.", "logic": "\nUnsavoury(ernaline)\nRational(ernaline)\nPackage(ernaline, jordan)\nPackage(ernaline, robbie)\nDaub(jordan, robbie)\nUnsavoury(jordan)\nRational(jordan)\nDaub(robbie, jordan)\nDaub(robbie, emmalyn)\nDaub(emmalyn, jordan)\nCrack(emmalyn, ernaline)\nCrack(emmalyn, robbie)\nRational(emmalyn) and Crack(emmalyn, robbie) -> Crack(robbie, emmalyn)\nforall x (Package(x, robbie) and Proustian(robbie) -> Xxix(robbie))\nCrack(robbie, emmalyn) and Crack(robbie, jordan) -> Daub(robbie, jordan)\nCrack(emmalyn, robbie) and Xxix(emmalyn) -> Rational(emmalyn)\nGreased(emmalyn) and Daub(emmalyn, ernaline) -> Daub(emmalyn, jordan)\nforall x (Daub(x, emmalyn) -> Package(x, jordan))\nforall x (Daub(x, ernaline) -> Crack(x, jordan))\nforall x (Crack(x, ernaline) -> Xxix(x))\n\nnot Rational(emmalyn)\n\nCrack(emmalyn, ernaline) and forall x (Crack(x, ernaline) -> Xxix(x)) -> therefore Xxix(emmalyn) Crack(emmalyn, robbie) and Xxix(emmalyn) and Crack(emmalyn, robbie) and Xxix(emmalyn) -> Rational(emmalyn) -> therefore Rational(emmalyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The huntlee is tantamount. The huntlee is shouldered. The huntlee reel the donia. The huntlee reel the tansy. The donia guzzle the tansy. The donia is tantamount. The donia is shouldered. The tansy guzzle the donia. The tansy guzzle the nerta. The nerta guzzle the donia. The nerta nasalise the huntlee. The nerta nasalise the tansy. If the nerta is shouldered and the nerta nasalise the tansy then the tansy nasalise the nerta. If someone reel the tansy and the tansy is yucky then the tansy is thermoset. If the tansy nasalise the nerta and the tansy nasalise the donia then the tansy guzzle the donia. If the nerta nasalise the tansy and the nerta is thermoset then the nerta is shouldered. If the nerta is bribable and the nerta guzzle the huntlee then the nerta guzzle the donia. If someone guzzle the nerta then they see the donia. If someone guzzle the huntlee then they like the donia. If someone nasalise the huntlee then they are thermoset. The tansy nasalise the nerta.", "logic": "\nTantamount(huntlee)\nShouldered(huntlee)\nReel(huntlee, donia)\nReel(huntlee, tansy)\nGuzzle(donia, tansy)\nTantamount(donia)\nShouldered(donia)\nGuzzle(tansy, donia)\nGuzzle(tansy, nerta)\nGuzzle(nerta, donia)\nNasalise(nerta, huntlee)\nNasalise(nerta, tansy)\nShouldered(nerta) and Nasalise(nerta, tansy) -> Nasalise(tansy, nerta)\nforall x (Reel(x, tansy) and Yucky(tansy) -> Thermoset(tansy))\nNasalise(tansy, nerta) and Nasalise(tansy, donia) -> Guzzle(tansy, donia)\nNasalise(nerta, tansy) and Thermoset(nerta) -> Shouldered(nerta)\nBribable(nerta) and Guzzle(nerta, huntlee) -> Guzzle(nerta, donia)\nforall x (Guzzle(x, nerta) -> Reel(x, donia))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, huntlee) -> Nasalise(x, donia))\nforall x (Nasalise(x, huntlee) -> Thermoset(x))\n\nNasalise(tansy, nerta)\n\nNasalise(nerta, huntlee) and forall x (Nasalise(x, huntlee) -> Thermoset(x)) -> therefore Thermoset(nerta) Nasalise(nerta, tansy) and Thermoset(nerta) and Nasalise(nerta, tansy) and Thermoset(nerta) -> Shouldered(nerta) -> therefore Shouldered(nerta) Shouldered(nerta) and Nasalise(nerta, tansy) and Shouldered(nerta) and Nasalise(nerta, tansy) -> Nasalise(tansy, nerta) -> therefore Nasalise(tansy, nerta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The bertine is meritless. The bertine is halting. The bertine click the yehudi. The bertine click the licha. The yehudi outcrop the licha. The yehudi is meritless. The yehudi is halting. The licha outcrop the yehudi. The licha outcrop the titos. The titos outcrop the yehudi. The titos flirt the bertine. The titos flirt the licha. If the titos is halting and the titos flirt the licha then the licha flirt the titos. If someone click the licha and the licha is unforested then the licha is hulky. If the licha flirt the titos and the licha flirt the yehudi then the licha outcrop the yehudi. If the titos flirt the licha and the titos is hulky then the titos is halting. If the titos is interior and the titos outcrop the bertine then the titos outcrop the yehudi. If someone outcrop the titos then they see the yehudi. If someone outcrop the bertine then they like the yehudi. If someone flirt the bertine then they are hulky. The licha does not like the titos.", "logic": "\nMeritless(bertine)\nHalting(bertine)\nClick(bertine, yehudi)\nClick(bertine, licha)\nOutcrop(yehudi, licha)\nMeritless(yehudi)\nHalting(yehudi)\nOutcrop(licha, yehudi)\nOutcrop(licha, titos)\nOutcrop(titos, yehudi)\nFlirt(titos, bertine)\nFlirt(titos, licha)\nHalting(titos) and Flirt(titos, licha) -> Flirt(licha, titos)\nforall x (Click(x, licha) and Unforested(licha) -> Hulky(licha))\nFlirt(licha, titos) and Flirt(licha, yehudi) -> Outcrop(licha, yehudi)\nFlirt(titos, licha) and Hulky(titos) -> Halting(titos)\nInterior(titos) and Outcrop(titos, bertine) -> Outcrop(titos, yehudi)\nforall x (Outcrop(x, titos) -> Click(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Outcrop(x, bertine) -> Flirt(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Flirt(x, bertine) -> Hulky(x))\n\nnot Flirt(licha, titos)\n\nFlirt(titos, bertine) and forall x (Flirt(x, bertine) -> Hulky(x)) -> therefore Hulky(titos) Flirt(titos, licha) and Hulky(titos) and Flirt(titos, licha) and Hulky(titos) -> Halting(titos) -> therefore Halting(titos) Halting(titos) and Flirt(titos, licha) and Halting(titos) and Flirt(titos, licha) -> Flirt(licha, titos) -> therefore Flirt(licha, titos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The lilias is percipient. The lilias is affordable. The lilias waterproof the tabbitha. The lilias waterproof the artur. The tabbitha parget the artur. The tabbitha is percipient. The tabbitha is affordable. The artur parget the tabbitha. The artur parget the tristan. The tristan parget the tabbitha. The tristan liken the lilias. The tristan liken the artur. If the tristan is affordable and the tristan liken the artur then the artur liken the tristan. If someone waterproof the artur and the artur is unripe then the artur is paneled. If the artur liken the tristan and the artur liken the tabbitha then the artur parget the tabbitha. If the tristan liken the artur and the tristan is paneled then the tristan is affordable. If the tristan is lenten and the tristan parget the lilias then the tristan parget the tabbitha. If someone parget the tristan then they see the tabbitha. If someone parget the lilias then they like the tabbitha. If someone liken the lilias then they are paneled. The tabbitha is not paneled.", "logic": "\nPercipient(lilias)\nAffordable(lilias)\nWaterproof(lilias, tabbitha)\nWaterproof(lilias, artur)\nParget(tabbitha, artur)\nPercipient(tabbitha)\nAffordable(tabbitha)\nParget(artur, tabbitha)\nParget(artur, tristan)\nParget(tristan, tabbitha)\nLiken(tristan, lilias)\nLiken(tristan, artur)\nAffordable(tristan) and Liken(tristan, artur) -> Liken(artur, tristan)\nforall x (Waterproof(x, artur) and Unripe(artur) -> Paneled(artur))\nLiken(artur, tristan) and Liken(artur, tabbitha) -> Parget(artur, tabbitha)\nLiken(tristan, artur) and Paneled(tristan) -> Affordable(tristan)\nLenten(tristan) and Parget(tristan, lilias) -> Parget(tristan, tabbitha)\nforall x (Parget(x, tristan) -> Waterproof(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Parget(x, lilias) -> Liken(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Liken(x, lilias) -> Paneled(x))\n\nnot Paneled(tabbitha)\n\nforall x (Liken(x, lilias) -> Paneled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The rodolphe is mexican. The rodolphe is betting. The rodolphe romanise the stanislaw. The rodolphe romanise the manon. The stanislaw blame the manon. The stanislaw is mexican. The stanislaw is betting. The manon blame the stanislaw. The manon blame the mary. The mary blame the stanislaw. The mary signify the rodolphe. The mary signify the manon. If the mary is betting and the mary signify the manon then the manon signify the mary. If someone romanise the manon and the manon is falling then the manon is atilt. If the manon signify the mary and the manon signify the stanislaw then the manon blame the stanislaw. If the mary signify the manon and the mary is atilt then the mary is betting. If the mary is electric and the mary blame the rodolphe then the mary blame the stanislaw. If someone blame the mary then they see the stanislaw. If someone blame the rodolphe then they like the stanislaw. If someone signify the rodolphe then they are atilt. The stanislaw romanise the stanislaw.", "logic": "\nMexican(rodolphe)\nBetting(rodolphe)\nRomanise(rodolphe, stanislaw)\nRomanise(rodolphe, manon)\nBlame(stanislaw, manon)\nMexican(stanislaw)\nBetting(stanislaw)\nBlame(manon, stanislaw)\nBlame(manon, mary)\nBlame(mary, stanislaw)\nSignify(mary, rodolphe)\nSignify(mary, manon)\nBetting(mary) and Signify(mary, manon) -> Signify(manon, mary)\nforall x (Romanise(x, manon) and Falling(manon) -> Atilt(manon))\nSignify(manon, mary) and Signify(manon, stanislaw) -> Blame(manon, stanislaw)\nSignify(mary, manon) and Atilt(mary) -> Betting(mary)\nElectric(mary) and Blame(mary, rodolphe) -> Blame(mary, stanislaw)\nforall x (Blame(x, mary) -> Romanise(x, stanislaw))\nforall x (Blame(x, rodolphe) -> Signify(x, stanislaw))\nforall x (Signify(x, rodolphe) -> Atilt(x))\n\nRomanise(stanislaw, stanislaw)\n\nforall x (Blame(x, mary) -> Romanise(x, stanislaw)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The gomer is olivelike. The gomer is valent. The gomer mother the toddie. The gomer mother the tressa. The toddie reunify the tressa. The toddie is olivelike. The toddie is valent. The tressa reunify the toddie. The tressa reunify the nathalia. The nathalia reunify the toddie. The nathalia discolour the gomer. The nathalia discolour the tressa. If the nathalia is valent and the nathalia discolour the tressa then the tressa discolour the nathalia. If someone mother the tressa and the tressa is wheelless then the tressa is seagoing. If the tressa discolour the nathalia and the tressa discolour the toddie then the tressa reunify the toddie. If the nathalia discolour the tressa and the nathalia is seagoing then the nathalia is valent. If the nathalia is eukaryotic and the nathalia reunify the gomer then the nathalia reunify the toddie. If someone reunify the nathalia then they see the toddie. If someone reunify the gomer then they like the toddie. If someone discolour the gomer then they are seagoing. The tressa does not like the toddie.", "logic": "\nOlivelike(gomer)\nValent(gomer)\nMother(gomer, toddie)\nMother(gomer, tressa)\nReunify(toddie, tressa)\nOlivelike(toddie)\nValent(toddie)\nReunify(tressa, toddie)\nReunify(tressa, nathalia)\nReunify(nathalia, toddie)\nDiscolour(nathalia, gomer)\nDiscolour(nathalia, tressa)\nValent(nathalia) and Discolour(nathalia, tressa) -> Discolour(tressa, nathalia)\nforall x (Mother(x, tressa) and Wheelless(tressa) -> Seagoing(tressa))\nDiscolour(tressa, nathalia) and Discolour(tressa, toddie) -> Reunify(tressa, toddie)\nDiscolour(nathalia, tressa) and Seagoing(nathalia) -> Valent(nathalia)\nEukaryotic(nathalia) and Reunify(nathalia, gomer) -> Reunify(nathalia, toddie)\nforall x (Reunify(x, nathalia) -> Mother(x, toddie))\nforall x (Reunify(x, gomer) -> Discolour(x, toddie))\nforall x (Discolour(x, gomer) -> Seagoing(x))\n\nnot Discolour(tressa, toddie)\n\nforall x (Reunify(x, gomer) -> Discolour(x, toddie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The darci is hemophilic. The darci is tweedy. The darci unfold the sharleen. The darci unfold the richie. The sharleen undulate the richie. The sharleen is hemophilic. The sharleen is tweedy. The richie undulate the sharleen. The richie undulate the thomasa. The thomasa undulate the sharleen. The thomasa ditch the darci. The thomasa ditch the richie. If the thomasa is tweedy and the thomasa ditch the richie then the richie ditch the thomasa. If someone unfold the richie and the richie is unfettered then the richie is iodized. If the richie ditch the thomasa and the richie ditch the sharleen then the richie undulate the sharleen. If the thomasa ditch the richie and the thomasa is iodized then the thomasa is tweedy. If the thomasa is isosceles and the thomasa undulate the darci then the thomasa undulate the sharleen. If someone undulate the thomasa then they see the sharleen. If someone undulate the darci then they like the sharleen. If someone ditch the darci then they are iodized. The thomasa unfold the sharleen.", "logic": "\nHemophilic(darci)\nTweedy(darci)\nUnfold(darci, sharleen)\nUnfold(darci, richie)\nUndulate(sharleen, richie)\nHemophilic(sharleen)\nTweedy(sharleen)\nUndulate(richie, sharleen)\nUndulate(richie, thomasa)\nUndulate(thomasa, sharleen)\nDitch(thomasa, darci)\nDitch(thomasa, richie)\nTweedy(thomasa) and Ditch(thomasa, richie) -> Ditch(richie, thomasa)\nforall x (Unfold(x, richie) and Unfettered(richie) -> Iodized(richie))\nDitch(richie, thomasa) and Ditch(richie, sharleen) -> Undulate(richie, sharleen)\nDitch(thomasa, richie) and Iodized(thomasa) -> Tweedy(thomasa)\nIsosceles(thomasa) and Undulate(thomasa, darci) -> Undulate(thomasa, sharleen)\nforall x (Undulate(x, thomasa) -> Unfold(x, sharleen))\nforall x (Undulate(x, darci) -> Ditch(x, sharleen))\nforall x (Ditch(x, darci) -> Iodized(x))\n\nUnfold(thomasa, sharleen)\n\nforall x (Undulate(x, thomasa) -> Unfold(x, sharleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The emmaline is azoic. The emmaline is emulous. The emmaline prim the gisella. The emmaline prim the elizabeth. The gisella wrack the elizabeth. The gisella is azoic. The gisella is emulous. The elizabeth wrack the gisella. The elizabeth wrack the lucretia. The lucretia wrack the gisella. The lucretia simonize the emmaline. The lucretia simonize the elizabeth. If the lucretia is emulous and the lucretia simonize the elizabeth then the elizabeth simonize the lucretia. If someone prim the elizabeth and the elizabeth is inaugural then the elizabeth is episcopal. If the elizabeth simonize the lucretia and the elizabeth simonize the gisella then the elizabeth wrack the gisella. If the lucretia simonize the elizabeth and the lucretia is episcopal then the lucretia is emulous. If the lucretia is summary and the lucretia wrack the emmaline then the lucretia wrack the gisella. If someone wrack the lucretia then they see the gisella. If someone wrack the emmaline then they like the gisella. If someone simonize the emmaline then they are episcopal. The elizabeth does not like the elizabeth.", "logic": "\nAzoic(emmaline)\nEmulous(emmaline)\nPrim(emmaline, gisella)\nPrim(emmaline, elizabeth)\nWrack(gisella, elizabeth)\nAzoic(gisella)\nEmulous(gisella)\nWrack(elizabeth, gisella)\nWrack(elizabeth, lucretia)\nWrack(lucretia, gisella)\nSimonize(lucretia, emmaline)\nSimonize(lucretia, elizabeth)\nEmulous(lucretia) and Simonize(lucretia, elizabeth) -> Simonize(elizabeth, lucretia)\nforall x (Prim(x, elizabeth) and Inaugural(elizabeth) -> Episcopal(elizabeth))\nSimonize(elizabeth, lucretia) and Simonize(elizabeth, gisella) -> Wrack(elizabeth, gisella)\nSimonize(lucretia, elizabeth) and Episcopal(lucretia) -> Emulous(lucretia)\nSummary(lucretia) and Wrack(lucretia, emmaline) -> Wrack(lucretia, gisella)\nforall x (Wrack(x, lucretia) -> Prim(x, gisella))\nforall x (Wrack(x, emmaline) -> Simonize(x, gisella))\nforall x (Simonize(x, emmaline) -> Episcopal(x))\n\nnot Simonize(elizabeth, elizabeth)\n\nnot Simonize(elizabeth, elizabeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The norwood is tending. The norwood is hypnotized. The norwood affiliate the latashia. The norwood affiliate the dona. The latashia bate the dona. The latashia is tending. The latashia is hypnotized. The dona bate the latashia. The dona bate the goldy. The goldy bate the latashia. The goldy admit the norwood. The goldy admit the dona. If the goldy is hypnotized and the goldy admit the dona then the dona admit the goldy. If someone affiliate the dona and the dona is calcific then the dona is crowning. If the dona admit the goldy and the dona admit the latashia then the dona bate the latashia. If the goldy admit the dona and the goldy is crowning then the goldy is hypnotized. If the goldy is unaccepted and the goldy bate the norwood then the goldy bate the latashia. If someone bate the goldy then they see the latashia. If someone bate the norwood then they like the latashia. If someone admit the norwood then they are crowning. The goldy affiliate the dona.", "logic": "\nTending(norwood)\nHypnotized(norwood)\nAffiliate(norwood, latashia)\nAffiliate(norwood, dona)\nBate(latashia, dona)\nTending(latashia)\nHypnotized(latashia)\nBate(dona, latashia)\nBate(dona, goldy)\nBate(goldy, latashia)\nAdmit(goldy, norwood)\nAdmit(goldy, dona)\nHypnotized(goldy) and Admit(goldy, dona) -> Admit(dona, goldy)\nforall x (Affiliate(x, dona) and Calcific(dona) -> Crowning(dona))\nAdmit(dona, goldy) and Admit(dona, latashia) -> Bate(dona, latashia)\nAdmit(goldy, dona) and Crowning(goldy) -> Hypnotized(goldy)\nUnaccepted(goldy) and Bate(goldy, norwood) -> Bate(goldy, latashia)\nforall x (Bate(x, goldy) -> Affiliate(x, latashia))\nforall x (Bate(x, norwood) -> Admit(x, latashia))\nforall x (Admit(x, norwood) -> Crowning(x))\n\nAffiliate(goldy, dona)\n\nAffiliate(goldy, dona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The elizabeth is zolaesque. The elizabeth is located. The elizabeth crenel the alain. The elizabeth crenel the carlen. The alain infix the carlen. The alain is zolaesque. The alain is located. The carlen infix the alain. The carlen infix the slade. The slade infix the alain. The slade imbue the elizabeth. The slade imbue the carlen. If the slade is located and the slade imbue the carlen then the carlen imbue the slade. If someone crenel the carlen and the carlen is sufferable then the carlen is comburant. If the carlen imbue the slade and the carlen imbue the alain then the carlen infix the alain. If the slade imbue the carlen and the slade is comburant then the slade is located. If the slade is oxidizable and the slade infix the elizabeth then the slade infix the alain. If someone infix the slade then they see the alain. If someone infix the elizabeth then they like the alain. If someone imbue the elizabeth then they are comburant. The elizabeth does not see the elizabeth.", "logic": "\nZolaesque(elizabeth)\nLocated(elizabeth)\nCrenel(elizabeth, alain)\nCrenel(elizabeth, carlen)\nInfix(alain, carlen)\nZolaesque(alain)\nLocated(alain)\nInfix(carlen, alain)\nInfix(carlen, slade)\nInfix(slade, alain)\nImbue(slade, elizabeth)\nImbue(slade, carlen)\nLocated(slade) and Imbue(slade, carlen) -> Imbue(carlen, slade)\nforall x (Crenel(x, carlen) and Sufferable(carlen) -> Comburant(carlen))\nImbue(carlen, slade) and Imbue(carlen, alain) -> Infix(carlen, alain)\nImbue(slade, carlen) and Comburant(slade) -> Located(slade)\nOxidizable(slade) and Infix(slade, elizabeth) -> Infix(slade, alain)\nforall x (Infix(x, slade) -> Crenel(x, alain))\nforall x (Infix(x, elizabeth) -> Imbue(x, alain))\nforall x (Imbue(x, elizabeth) -> Comburant(x))\n\nnot Crenel(elizabeth, elizabeth)\n\nnot Crenel(elizabeth, elizabeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The ingunna is unkindly. The ingunna is workable. The ingunna heap the garvin. The ingunna heap the colleen. The garvin dissociate the colleen. The garvin is unkindly. The garvin is workable. The colleen dissociate the garvin. The colleen dissociate the haley. The haley dissociate the garvin. The haley aviate the ingunna. The haley aviate the colleen. If the haley is workable and the haley aviate the colleen then the colleen aviate the haley. If someone heap the colleen and the colleen is equanimous then the colleen is lipophilic. If the colleen aviate the haley and the colleen aviate the garvin then the colleen dissociate the garvin. If the haley aviate the colleen and the haley is lipophilic then the haley is workable. If the haley is kindled and the haley dissociate the ingunna then the haley dissociate the garvin. If someone dissociate the haley then they see the garvin. If someone dissociate the ingunna then they like the garvin. If someone aviate the ingunna then they are lipophilic. The haley is unkindly.", "logic": "\nUnkindly(ingunna)\nWorkable(ingunna)\nHeap(ingunna, garvin)\nHeap(ingunna, colleen)\nDissociate(garvin, colleen)\nUnkindly(garvin)\nWorkable(garvin)\nDissociate(colleen, garvin)\nDissociate(colleen, haley)\nDissociate(haley, garvin)\nAviate(haley, ingunna)\nAviate(haley, colleen)\nWorkable(haley) and Aviate(haley, colleen) -> Aviate(colleen, haley)\nforall x (Heap(x, colleen) and Equanimous(colleen) -> Lipophilic(colleen))\nAviate(colleen, haley) and Aviate(colleen, garvin) -> Dissociate(colleen, garvin)\nAviate(haley, colleen) and Lipophilic(haley) -> Workable(haley)\nKindled(haley) and Dissociate(haley, ingunna) -> Dissociate(haley, garvin)\nforall x (Dissociate(x, haley) -> Heap(x, garvin))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, ingunna) -> Aviate(x, garvin))\nforall x (Aviate(x, ingunna) -> Lipophilic(x))\n\nUnkindly(haley)\n\nUnkindly(haley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Carlo is idolised. Gray is rateable. Tiffie is unlabeled. Bess is gainly. If someone is aecial and postictal then they are idolised. Nice, noted people are gainly. Kind people are postictal. All rateable people are unlabeled. All postictal people are aecial. All unlabeled, postictal people are idolised. Carlo is idolised.", "logic": "\nIdolised(carlo)\nRateable(gray)\nUnlabeled(tiffie)\nGainly(bess)\nforall x (Aecial(x) and Postictal(x) -> Idolised(x))\nforall x (Idolised(x) and Noted(x) -> Gainly(x))\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> Postictal(x))\nforall x (Rateable(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) and Postictal(x) -> Idolised(x))\n\nIdolised(carlo)\n\ntherefore Idolised(carlo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Dom is shouted. Vincent is unbroken. Kelcie is verrucose. Dinah is shaken. If someone is antheral and basilary then they are shouted. Nice, prescient people are shaken. Kind people are basilary. All unbroken people are verrucose. All basilary people are antheral. All verrucose, basilary people are shouted. Kelcie is not verrucose.", "logic": "\nShouted(dom)\nUnbroken(vincent)\nVerrucose(kelcie)\nShaken(dinah)\nforall x (Antheral(x) and Basilary(x) -> Shouted(x))\nforall x (Shouted(x) and Prescient(x) -> Shaken(x))\nforall x (Shaken(x) -> Basilary(x))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) -> Verrucose(x))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Verrucose(x) and Basilary(x) -> Shouted(x))\n\nnot Verrucose(kelcie)\n\ntherefore Verrucose(kelcie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Correna is mocking. Nitin is olfactive. Carmelina is revokable. Jereme is merging. If someone is biloculate and diarrhoeic then they are mocking. Nice, cannular people are merging. Kind people are diarrhoeic. All olfactive people are revokable. All diarrhoeic people are biloculate. All revokable, diarrhoeic people are mocking. Jereme is diarrhoeic.", "logic": "\nMocking(correna)\nOlfactive(nitin)\nRevokable(carmelina)\nMerging(jereme)\nforall x (Biloculate(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Mocking(x))\nforall x (Mocking(x) and Cannular(x) -> Merging(x))\nforall x (Merging(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) -> Biloculate(x))\nforall x (Revokable(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Mocking(x))\n\nDiarrhoeic(jereme)\n\nMerging(jereme) and forall x (Merging(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x)) -> therefore Diarrhoeic(jereme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Aub is humorless. Cassandre is shockable. Hetty is seamless. Kissiah is unbroken. If someone is paperlike and weighty then they are humorless. Nice, returning people are unbroken. Kind people are weighty. All shockable people are seamless. All weighty people are paperlike. All seamless, weighty people are humorless. Kissiah is not weighty.", "logic": "\nHumorless(aub)\nShockable(cassandre)\nSeamless(hetty)\nUnbroken(kissiah)\nforall x (Paperlike(x) and Weighty(x) -> Humorless(x))\nforall x (Humorless(x) and Returning(x) -> Unbroken(x))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) -> Weighty(x))\nforall x (Shockable(x) -> Seamless(x))\nforall x (Weighty(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Seamless(x) and Weighty(x) -> Humorless(x))\n\nnot Weighty(kissiah)\n\nUnbroken(kissiah) and forall x (Unbroken(x) -> Weighty(x)) -> therefore Weighty(kissiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Melodee is devilish. Marybelle is eudaemonic. Maryjane is subaltern. Dorotea is benevolent. If someone is mongolian and european then they are devilish. Nice, bleak people are benevolent. Kind people are european. All eudaemonic people are subaltern. All european people are mongolian. All subaltern, european people are devilish. Dorotea is mongolian.", "logic": "\nDevilish(melodee)\nEudaemonic(marybelle)\nSubaltern(maryjane)\nBenevolent(dorotea)\nforall x (Mongolian(x) and European(x) -> Devilish(x))\nforall x (Devilish(x) and Bleak(x) -> Benevolent(x))\nforall x (Benevolent(x) -> European(x))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Subaltern(x))\nforall x (European(x) -> Mongolian(x))\nforall x (Subaltern(x) and European(x) -> Devilish(x))\n\nMongolian(dorotea)\n\nBenevolent(dorotea) and forall x (Benevolent(x) -> European(x)) -> therefore European(dorotea) European(dorotea) and forall x (European(x) -> Mongolian(x)) -> therefore Mongolian(dorotea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Hedwig is unclean. Nike is anecdotic. Noelani is robustious. Manish is panicked. If someone is hominal and glum then they are unclean. Nice, supplicant people are panicked. Kind people are glum. All anecdotic people are robustious. All glum people are hominal. All robustious, glum people are unclean. Manish is not hominal.", "logic": "\nUnclean(hedwig)\nAnecdotic(nike)\nRobustious(noelani)\nPanicked(manish)\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Glum(x) -> Unclean(x))\nforall x (Unclean(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Glum(x))\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) -> Robustious(x))\nforall x (Glum(x) -> Hominal(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and Glum(x) -> Unclean(x))\n\nnot Hominal(manish)\n\nPanicked(manish) and forall x (Panicked(x) -> Glum(x)) -> therefore Glum(manish) Glum(manish) and forall x (Glum(x) -> Hominal(x)) -> therefore Hominal(manish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Malanie is ignorant. Mersey is solomonic. Randene is upstairs. Basia is damaging. If someone is mutinous and palish then they are ignorant. Nice, hearing people are damaging. Kind people are palish. All solomonic people are upstairs. All palish people are mutinous. All upstairs, palish people are ignorant. Basia is ignorant.", "logic": "\nIgnorant(malanie)\nSolomonic(mersey)\nUpstairs(randene)\nDamaging(basia)\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Palish(x) -> Ignorant(x))\nforall x (Ignorant(x) and Hearing(x) -> Damaging(x))\nforall x (Damaging(x) -> Palish(x))\nforall x (Solomonic(x) -> Upstairs(x))\nforall x (Palish(x) -> Mutinous(x))\nforall x (Upstairs(x) and Palish(x) -> Ignorant(x))\n\nIgnorant(basia)\n\nDamaging(basia) and forall x (Damaging(x) -> Palish(x)) -> therefore Palish(basia) Palish(basia) and forall x (Palish(x) -> Mutinous(x)) -> therefore Mutinous(basia) Damaging(basia) and forall x (Damaging(x) -> Palish(x)) -> therefore Palish(basia) Mutinous(basia) and Palish(basia) and forall x (Mutinous(x) and Palish(x) -> Ignorant(x)) -> therefore Ignorant(basia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Toddy is galvanic. Darsey is taped. Kaleb is classless. Berri is sobering. If someone is brushed and knowing then they are galvanic. Nice, grotty people are sobering. Kind people are knowing. All taped people are classless. All knowing people are brushed. All classless, knowing people are galvanic. Berri is not galvanic.", "logic": "\nGalvanic(toddy)\nTaped(darsey)\nClassless(kaleb)\nSobering(berri)\nforall x (Brushed(x) and Knowing(x) -> Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Grotty(x) -> Sobering(x))\nforall x (Sobering(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Taped(x) -> Classless(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Brushed(x))\nforall x (Classless(x) and Knowing(x) -> Galvanic(x))\n\nnot Galvanic(berri)\n\nSobering(berri) and forall x (Sobering(x) -> Knowing(x)) -> therefore Knowing(berri) Knowing(berri) and forall x (Knowing(x) -> Brushed(x)) -> therefore Brushed(berri) Sobering(berri) and forall x (Sobering(x) -> Knowing(x)) -> therefore Knowing(berri) Brushed(berri) and Knowing(berri) and forall x (Brushed(x) and Knowing(x) -> Galvanic(x)) -> therefore Galvanic(berri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Laurent is allotted. Lizzie is unhappy. Remington is germane. Justine is delible. If someone is attenuate and insentient then they are allotted. Nice, sombre people are delible. Kind people are insentient. All unhappy people are germane. All insentient people are attenuate. All germane, insentient people are allotted. Laurent is not germane.", "logic": "\nAllotted(laurent)\nUnhappy(lizzie)\nGermane(remington)\nDelible(justine)\nforall x (Attenuate(x) and Insentient(x) -> Allotted(x))\nforall x (Allotted(x) and Sombre(x) -> Delible(x))\nforall x (Delible(x) -> Insentient(x))\nforall x (Unhappy(x) -> Germane(x))\nforall x (Insentient(x) -> Attenuate(x))\nforall x (Germane(x) and Insentient(x) -> Allotted(x))\n\nnot Germane(laurent)\n\nforall x (Unhappy(x) -> Germane(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Elysia is galactic. Pacifica is patchy. Vickie is hindi. Iris is protozoic. If someone is grandiose and splenetic then they are galactic. Nice, monocarpic people are protozoic. Kind people are splenetic. All patchy people are hindi. All splenetic people are grandiose. All hindi, splenetic people are galactic. Elysia is protozoic.", "logic": "\nGalactic(elysia)\nPatchy(pacifica)\nHindi(vickie)\nProtozoic(iris)\nforall x (Grandiose(x) and Splenetic(x) -> Galactic(x))\nforall x (Galactic(x) and Monocarpic(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) -> Splenetic(x))\nforall x (Patchy(x) -> Hindi(x))\nforall x (Splenetic(x) -> Grandiose(x))\nforall x (Hindi(x) and Splenetic(x) -> Galactic(x))\n\nProtozoic(elysia)\n\nforall x (Galactic(x) and Monocarpic(x) -> Protozoic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Barbey is vulcanized. Laila is hyperfine. Fawna is petty. Archie is sufi. If someone is beat and armed then they are vulcanized. Nice, southmost people are sufi. Kind people are armed. All hyperfine people are petty. All armed people are beat. All petty, armed people are vulcanized. Fawna is not beat.", "logic": "\nVulcanized(barbey)\nHyperfine(laila)\nPetty(fawna)\nSufi(archie)\nforall x (Beat(x) and Armed(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Vulcanized(x) and Southmost(x) -> Sufi(x))\nforall x (Sufi(x) -> Armed(x))\nforall x (Hyperfine(x) -> Petty(x))\nforall x (Armed(x) -> Beat(x))\nforall x (Petty(x) and Armed(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\n\nnot Beat(fawna)\n\nforall x (Armed(x) -> Beat(x)) <- forall x (Sufi(x) -> Armed(x)) <- forall x (Vulcanized(x) and Southmost(x) -> Sufi(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Ruthe is milanese. Fayre is farthest. Hester is incurvate. Juline is optical. If someone is monocarpic and tentative then they are milanese. Nice, mandaean people are optical. Kind people are tentative. All farthest people are incurvate. All tentative people are monocarpic. All incurvate, tentative people are milanese. Ruthe is tentative.", "logic": "\nMilanese(ruthe)\nFarthest(fayre)\nIncurvate(hester)\nOptical(juline)\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) and Tentative(x) -> Milanese(x))\nforall x (Milanese(x) and Mandaean(x) -> Optical(x))\nforall x (Optical(x) -> Tentative(x))\nforall x (Farthest(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nforall x (Tentative(x) -> Monocarpic(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x) and Tentative(x) -> Milanese(x))\n\nTentative(ruthe)\n\nforall x (Optical(x) -> Tentative(x)) <- forall x (Milanese(x) and Mandaean(x) -> Optical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Marwin is smoked. Jordanna is ordered. Morgana is advised. Terrell is cousinly. If someone is gelid and blase then they are smoked. Nice, declarable people are cousinly. Kind people are blase. All ordered people are advised. All blase people are gelid. All advised, blase people are smoked. Marwin is not ordered.", "logic": "\nSmoked(marwin)\nOrdered(jordanna)\nAdvised(morgana)\nCousinly(terrell)\nforall x (Gelid(x) and Blase(x) -> Smoked(x))\nforall x (Smoked(x) and Declarable(x) -> Cousinly(x))\nforall x (Cousinly(x) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Ordered(x) -> Advised(x))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) and Blase(x) -> Smoked(x))\n\nnot Ordered(marwin)\n\nnot Ordered(marwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Sidnee is squeamish. Kary is consensual. Tadeas is molded. Albertina is woolen. If someone is dishonored and spaced then they are squeamish. Nice, soused people are woolen. Kind people are spaced. All consensual people are molded. All spaced people are dishonored. All molded, spaced people are squeamish. Sidnee is soused.", "logic": "\nSqueamish(sidnee)\nConsensual(kary)\nMolded(tadeas)\nWoolen(albertina)\nforall x (Dishonored(x) and Spaced(x) -> Squeamish(x))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) and Soused(x) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Woolen(x) -> Spaced(x))\nforall x (Consensual(x) -> Molded(x))\nforall x (Spaced(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Molded(x) and Spaced(x) -> Squeamish(x))\n\nSoused(sidnee)\n\nSoused(sidnee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Magdalena is blooded. Alston is inheriting. Davin is dusty. Xylia is satanic. If someone is calloused and unabridged then they are blooded. Nice, statuary people are satanic. Kind people are unabridged. All inheriting people are dusty. All unabridged people are calloused. All dusty, unabridged people are blooded. Davin is not statuary.", "logic": "\nBlooded(magdalena)\nInheriting(alston)\nDusty(davin)\nSatanic(xylia)\nforall x (Calloused(x) and Unabridged(x) -> Blooded(x))\nforall x (Blooded(x) and Statuary(x) -> Satanic(x))\nforall x (Satanic(x) -> Unabridged(x))\nforall x (Inheriting(x) -> Dusty(x))\nforall x (Unabridged(x) -> Calloused(x))\nforall x (Dusty(x) and Unabridged(x) -> Blooded(x))\n\nnot Statuary(davin)\n\nnot Statuary(davin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Nolan is lazy. Glynn is nonprofit. Jeanelle is ungoverned. Sharie is sopranino. If someone is expected and earliest then they are lazy. Nice, revertible people are sopranino. Kind people are earliest. All nonprofit people are ungoverned. All earliest people are expected. All ungoverned, earliest people are lazy. Sharie is nonprofit.", "logic": "\nLazy(nolan)\nNonprofit(glynn)\nUngoverned(jeanelle)\nSopranino(sharie)\nforall x (Expected(x) and Earliest(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Lazy(x) and Revertible(x) -> Sopranino(x))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Earliest(x))\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Expected(x))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and Earliest(x) -> Lazy(x))\n\nNonprofit(sharie)\n\nNonprofit(sharie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Gwynne is atomic. Endora is robotlike. All blooded, atomic people are springlike. If someone is springlike and unpleasant then they are pathetic. If Endora is blooded then Endora is atomic. If someone is robotlike then they are springlike. All springlike, robotlike people are blooded. All unpleasant, blooded people are robotlike. Endora is robotlike.", "logic": "\nAtomic(gwynne)\nRobotlike(endora)\nforall x (Blooded(x) and Atomic(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Springlike(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Pathetic(x))\nBlooded(endora) -> Atomic(endora)\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Springlike(x) and Robotlike(x) -> Blooded(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Blooded(x) -> Robotlike(x))\n\nRobotlike(endora)\n\ntherefore Robotlike(endora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Anstice is sprawling. Trudey is scowling. All boon, sprawling people are breathless. If someone is breathless and dynastic then they are reposeful. If Trudey is boon then Trudey is sprawling. If someone is scowling then they are breathless. All breathless, scowling people are boon. All dynastic, boon people are scowling. Trudey is not scowling.", "logic": "\nSprawling(anstice)\nScowling(trudey)\nforall x (Boon(x) and Sprawling(x) -> Breathless(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) and Dynastic(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nBoon(trudey) -> Sprawling(trudey)\nforall x (Scowling(x) -> Breathless(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) and Scowling(x) -> Boon(x))\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and Boon(x) -> Scowling(x))\n\nnot Scowling(trudey)\n\ntherefore Scowling(trudey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Aretha is runaway. Carlita is dumfounded. All vestmented, runaway people are entozoic. If someone is entozoic and cankerous then they are merging. If Carlita is vestmented then Carlita is runaway. If someone is dumfounded then they are entozoic. All entozoic, dumfounded people are vestmented. All cankerous, vestmented people are dumfounded. Carlita is entozoic.", "logic": "\nRunaway(aretha)\nDumfounded(carlita)\nforall x (Vestmented(x) and Runaway(x) -> Entozoic(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) and Cankerous(x) -> Merging(x))\nVestmented(carlita) -> Runaway(carlita)\nforall x (Dumfounded(x) -> Entozoic(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) and Dumfounded(x) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Cankerous(x) and Vestmented(x) -> Dumfounded(x))\n\nEntozoic(carlita)\n\nDumfounded(carlita) and forall x (Dumfounded(x) -> Entozoic(x)) -> therefore Entozoic(carlita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Linet is authorial. Neville is functional. All explosive, authorial people are unlikable. If someone is unlikable and dragging then they are meltable. If Neville is explosive then Neville is authorial. If someone is functional then they are unlikable. All unlikable, functional people are explosive. All dragging, explosive people are functional. Neville is not unlikable.", "logic": "\nAuthorial(linet)\nFunctional(neville)\nforall x (Explosive(x) and Authorial(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nforall x (Unlikable(x) and Dragging(x) -> Meltable(x))\nExplosive(neville) -> Authorial(neville)\nforall x (Functional(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nforall x (Unlikable(x) and Functional(x) -> Explosive(x))\nforall x (Dragging(x) and Explosive(x) -> Functional(x))\n\nnot Unlikable(neville)\n\nFunctional(neville) and forall x (Functional(x) -> Unlikable(x)) -> therefore Unlikable(neville)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Waldon is eritrean. Annice is twin. All undersea, eritrean people are insensate. If someone is insensate and gauche then they are tasteful. If Annice is undersea then Annice is eritrean. If someone is twin then they are insensate. All insensate, twin people are undersea. All gauche, undersea people are twin. Annice is undersea.", "logic": "\nEritrean(waldon)\nTwin(annice)\nforall x (Undersea(x) and Eritrean(x) -> Insensate(x))\nforall x (Insensate(x) and Gauche(x) -> Tasteful(x))\nUndersea(annice) -> Eritrean(annice)\nforall x (Twin(x) -> Insensate(x))\nforall x (Insensate(x) and Twin(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Undersea(x) -> Twin(x))\n\nUndersea(annice)\n\nTwin(annice) and forall x (Twin(x) -> Insensate(x)) -> therefore Insensate(annice) Insensate(annice) and Twin(annice) and forall x (Insensate(x) and Twin(x) -> Undersea(x)) -> therefore Undersea(annice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Wood is tabu. Nixie is upbound. All acephalous, tabu people are choleric. If someone is choleric and repellent then they are carpellate. If Nixie is acephalous then Nixie is tabu. If someone is upbound then they are choleric. All choleric, upbound people are acephalous. All repellent, acephalous people are upbound. Nixie is not acephalous.", "logic": "\nTabu(wood)\nUpbound(nixie)\nforall x (Acephalous(x) and Tabu(x) -> Choleric(x))\nforall x (Choleric(x) and Repellent(x) -> Carpellate(x))\nAcephalous(nixie) -> Tabu(nixie)\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Choleric(x))\nforall x (Choleric(x) and Upbound(x) -> Acephalous(x))\nforall x (Repellent(x) and Acephalous(x) -> Upbound(x))\n\nnot Acephalous(nixie)\n\nUpbound(nixie) and forall x (Upbound(x) -> Choleric(x)) -> therefore Choleric(nixie) Choleric(nixie) and Upbound(nixie) and forall x (Choleric(x) and Upbound(x) -> Acephalous(x)) -> therefore Acephalous(nixie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Jocelin is anorthitic. Orsola is informal. All misplaced, anorthitic people are bladed. If someone is bladed and venal then they are prismatic. If Orsola is misplaced then Orsola is anorthitic. If someone is informal then they are bladed. All bladed, informal people are misplaced. All venal, misplaced people are informal. Orsola is anorthitic.", "logic": "\nAnorthitic(jocelin)\nInformal(orsola)\nforall x (Misplaced(x) and Anorthitic(x) -> Bladed(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) and Venal(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nMisplaced(orsola) -> Anorthitic(orsola)\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Bladed(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) and Informal(x) -> Misplaced(x))\nforall x (Venal(x) and Misplaced(x) -> Informal(x))\n\nAnorthitic(orsola)\n\nInformal(orsola) and forall x (Informal(x) -> Bladed(x)) -> therefore Bladed(orsola) Bladed(orsola) and Informal(orsola) and forall x (Bladed(x) and Informal(x) -> Misplaced(x)) -> therefore Misplaced(orsola) Misplaced(orsola) and Misplaced(orsola) -> Anorthitic(orsola) -> therefore Anorthitic(orsola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Felipa is calyculate. Celia is gooey. All mellowed, calyculate people are drunken. If someone is drunken and javan then they are olive. If Celia is mellowed then Celia is calyculate. If someone is gooey then they are drunken. All drunken, gooey people are mellowed. All javan, mellowed people are gooey. Celia is not calyculate.", "logic": "\nCalyculate(felipa)\nGooey(celia)\nforall x (Mellowed(x) and Calyculate(x) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Drunken(x) and Javan(x) -> Olive(x))\nMellowed(celia) -> Calyculate(celia)\nforall x (Gooey(x) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Drunken(x) and Gooey(x) -> Mellowed(x))\nforall x (Javan(x) and Mellowed(x) -> Gooey(x))\n\nnot Calyculate(celia)\n\nGooey(celia) and forall x (Gooey(x) -> Drunken(x)) -> therefore Drunken(celia) Drunken(celia) and Gooey(celia) and forall x (Drunken(x) and Gooey(x) -> Mellowed(x)) -> therefore Mellowed(celia) Mellowed(celia) and Mellowed(celia) -> Calyculate(celia) -> therefore Calyculate(celia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Mimi is corsican. Rozanne is oversea. All tolerant, corsican people are carangid. If someone is carangid and sombre then they are bilobed. If Rozanne is tolerant then Rozanne is corsican. If someone is oversea then they are carangid. All carangid, oversea people are tolerant. All sombre, tolerant people are oversea. Rozanne is not bilobed.", "logic": "\nCorsican(mimi)\nOversea(rozanne)\nforall x (Tolerant(x) and Corsican(x) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Carangid(x) and Sombre(x) -> Bilobed(x))\nTolerant(rozanne) -> Corsican(rozanne)\nforall x (Oversea(x) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Carangid(x) and Oversea(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Sombre(x) and Tolerant(x) -> Oversea(x))\n\nnot Bilobed(rozanne)\n\nforall x (Carangid(x) and Sombre(x) -> Bilobed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Fanchette is bankrupt. Joby is risible. All oiled, bankrupt people are holophytic. If someone is holophytic and peeved then they are popish. If Joby is oiled then Joby is bankrupt. If someone is risible then they are holophytic. All holophytic, risible people are oiled. All peeved, oiled people are risible. Fanchette is popish.", "logic": "\nBankrupt(fanchette)\nRisible(joby)\nforall x (Oiled(x) and Bankrupt(x) -> Holophytic(x))\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Peeved(x) -> Popish(x))\nOiled(joby) -> Bankrupt(joby)\nforall x (Risible(x) -> Holophytic(x))\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Risible(x) -> Oiled(x))\nforall x (Peeved(x) and Oiled(x) -> Risible(x))\n\nPopish(fanchette)\n\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Peeved(x) -> Popish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Robbyn is brutish. Vena is facile. All sluggish, brutish people are psychic. If someone is psychic and sightly then they are guileful. If Vena is sluggish then Vena is brutish. If someone is facile then they are psychic. All psychic, facile people are sluggish. All sightly, sluggish people are facile. Robbyn is not facile.", "logic": "\nBrutish(robbyn)\nFacile(vena)\nforall x (Sluggish(x) and Brutish(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Psychic(x) and Sightly(x) -> Guileful(x))\nSluggish(vena) -> Brutish(vena)\nforall x (Facile(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Psychic(x) and Facile(x) -> Sluggish(x))\nforall x (Sightly(x) and Sluggish(x) -> Facile(x))\n\nnot Facile(robbyn)\n\nforall x (Sightly(x) and Sluggish(x) -> Facile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Emelda is mysophobic. Andri is back. All unpictured, mysophobic people are nonviscid. If someone is nonviscid and tatty then they are oral. If Andri is unpictured then Andri is mysophobic. If someone is back then they are nonviscid. All nonviscid, back people are unpictured. All tatty, unpictured people are back. Emelda is nonviscid.", "logic": "\nMysophobic(emelda)\nBack(andri)\nforall x (Unpictured(x) and Mysophobic(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) and Tatty(x) -> Oral(x))\nUnpictured(andri) -> Mysophobic(andri)\nforall x (Back(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) and Back(x) -> Unpictured(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) and Unpictured(x) -> Back(x))\n\nNonviscid(emelda)\n\nforall x (Unpictured(x) and Mysophobic(x) -> Nonviscid(x)) <- forall x (Nonviscid(x) and Back(x) -> Unpictured(x)) <- forall x (Tatty(x) and Unpictured(x) -> Back(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Modesty is negligent. Mandy is congealed. All inexact, negligent people are hindmost. If someone is hindmost and aplanatic then they are armoured. If Mandy is inexact then Mandy is negligent. If someone is congealed then they are hindmost. All hindmost, congealed people are inexact. All aplanatic, inexact people are congealed. Mandy is not aplanatic.", "logic": "\nNegligent(modesty)\nCongealed(mandy)\nforall x (Inexact(x) and Negligent(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) and Aplanatic(x) -> Armoured(x))\nInexact(mandy) -> Negligent(mandy)\nforall x (Congealed(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) and Congealed(x) -> Inexact(x))\nforall x (Aplanatic(x) and Inexact(x) -> Congealed(x))\n\nnot Aplanatic(mandy)\n\nnot Aplanatic(mandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Trent is abeyant. Saxe is hyaloid. All pinched, abeyant people are nonliteral. If someone is nonliteral and venetian then they are inside. If Saxe is pinched then Saxe is abeyant. If someone is hyaloid then they are nonliteral. All nonliteral, hyaloid people are pinched. All venetian, pinched people are hyaloid. Trent is furry.", "logic": "\nAbeyant(trent)\nHyaloid(saxe)\nforall x (Pinched(x) and Abeyant(x) -> Nonliteral(x))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) and Venetian(x) -> Inside(x))\nPinched(saxe) -> Abeyant(saxe)\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Nonliteral(x))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) and Hyaloid(x) -> Pinched(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) and Pinched(x) -> Hyaloid(x))\n\nFurry(trent)\n\nFurry(trent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Cameo is localised. Emmery is elflike. All unpledged, localised people are sceptred. If someone is sceptred and uncapped then they are oracular. If Emmery is unpledged then Emmery is localised. If someone is elflike then they are sceptred. All sceptred, elflike people are unpledged. All uncapped, unpledged people are elflike. Emmery is not furry.", "logic": "\nLocalised(cameo)\nElflike(emmery)\nforall x (Unpledged(x) and Localised(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Sceptred(x) and Uncapped(x) -> Oracular(x))\nUnpledged(emmery) -> Localised(emmery)\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Sceptred(x) and Elflike(x) -> Unpledged(x))\nforall x (Uncapped(x) and Unpledged(x) -> Elflike(x))\n\nnot Furry(emmery)\n\nnot Furry(emmery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Adolphus is underhand. Oscar is bicornuous. All nonviolent, underhand people are afire. If someone is afire and consensual then they are overproud. If Oscar is nonviolent then Oscar is underhand. If someone is bicornuous then they are afire. All afire, bicornuous people are nonviolent. All consensual, nonviolent people are bicornuous. Adolphus is consensual.", "logic": "\nUnderhand(adolphus)\nBicornuous(oscar)\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) and Underhand(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and Consensual(x) -> Overproud(x))\nNonviolent(oscar) -> Underhand(oscar)\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and Bicornuous(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\nforall x (Consensual(x) and Nonviolent(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\n\nConsensual(adolphus)\n\nConsensual(adolphus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "The coretta accrete the dudley. The coretta accrete the vernice. The coretta accrete the doroteya. The coretta expect the doroteya. The dudley is treacly. The dudley does not see the coretta. The dudley piggyback the doroteya. The vernice accrete the dudley. The vernice accrete the doroteya. The vernice does not visit the doroteya. The doroteya accrete the coretta. The doroteya does not chase the dudley. If the dudley is lipped then the dudley does not see the coretta. If something expect the doroteya then the doroteya is palliative. If something piggyback the doroteya and the doroteya accrete the coretta then the doroteya does not see the dudley. If something is palliative then it expect the coretta. If something piggyback the dudley then the dudley does not visit the coretta. If something is palliative then it piggyback the coretta. If something is palliative then it piggyback the dudley. If something expect the dudley and it is not betrothed then it is not unearthly. The coretta accrete the doroteya.", "logic": "\nAccrete(coretta, dudley)\nAccrete(coretta, vernice)\nAccrete(coretta, doroteya)\nExpect(coretta, doroteya)\nTreacly(dudley)\nnot Expect(dudley, coretta)\nPiggyback(dudley, doroteya)\nAccrete(vernice, dudley)\nAccrete(vernice, doroteya)\nnot Piggyback(vernice, doroteya)\nAccrete(doroteya, coretta)\nnot Accrete(doroteya, dudley)\nLipped(dudley) -> not Expect(dudley, coretta)\nforall x (Expect(x, doroteya) -> Palliative(doroteya))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, doroteya) and Accrete(doroteya, coretta) -> not Expect(doroteya, dudley))\nforall x (Palliative(x) -> Expect(x, coretta))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, dudley) -> not Piggyback(dudley, coretta))\nforall x (Palliative(x) -> Piggyback(x, coretta))\nforall x (Palliative(x) -> Piggyback(x, dudley))\nforall x (Expect(x, dudley) and not Betrothed(x) -> not Unearthly(x))\n\nAccrete(coretta, doroteya)\n\ntherefore Accrete(coretta, doroteya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The worth remember the reeta. The worth remember the daryl. The worth remember the barnard. The worth retaliate the barnard. The reeta is debile. The reeta does not see the worth. The reeta rein the barnard. The daryl remember the reeta. The daryl remember the barnard. The daryl does not visit the barnard. The barnard remember the worth. The barnard does not chase the reeta. If the reeta is ropy then the reeta does not see the worth. If something retaliate the barnard then the barnard is amatory. If something rein the barnard and the barnard remember the worth then the barnard does not see the reeta. If something is amatory then it retaliate the worth. If something rein the reeta then the reeta does not visit the worth. If something is amatory then it rein the worth. If something is amatory then it rein the reeta. If something retaliate the reeta and it is not muscovite then it is not melted. The reeta does not visit the barnard.", "logic": "\nRemember(worth, reeta)\nRemember(worth, daryl)\nRemember(worth, barnard)\nRetaliate(worth, barnard)\nDebile(reeta)\nnot Retaliate(reeta, worth)\nRein(reeta, barnard)\nRemember(daryl, reeta)\nRemember(daryl, barnard)\nnot Rein(daryl, barnard)\nRemember(barnard, worth)\nnot Remember(barnard, reeta)\nRopy(reeta) -> not Retaliate(reeta, worth)\nforall x (Retaliate(x, barnard) -> Amatory(barnard))\nforall x (Rein(x, barnard) and Remember(barnard, worth) -> not Retaliate(barnard, reeta))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Retaliate(x, worth))\nforall x (Rein(x, reeta) -> not Rein(reeta, worth))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Rein(x, worth))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Rein(x, reeta))\nforall x (Retaliate(x, reeta) and not Muscovite(x) -> not Melted(x))\n\nnot Rein(reeta, barnard)\n\ntherefore Rein(reeta, barnard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The jarvis confection the orelie. The jarvis confection the suki. The jarvis confection the godfrey. The jarvis burglarise the godfrey. The orelie is unburied. The orelie does not see the jarvis. The orelie ebonize the godfrey. The suki confection the orelie. The suki confection the godfrey. The suki does not visit the godfrey. The godfrey confection the jarvis. The godfrey does not chase the orelie. If the orelie is octangular then the orelie does not see the jarvis. If something burglarise the godfrey then the godfrey is toughened. If something ebonize the godfrey and the godfrey confection the jarvis then the godfrey does not see the orelie. If something is toughened then it burglarise the jarvis. If something ebonize the orelie then the orelie does not visit the jarvis. If something is toughened then it ebonize the jarvis. If something is toughened then it ebonize the orelie. If something burglarise the orelie and it is not paintable then it is not funerary. The godfrey is toughened.", "logic": "\nConfection(jarvis, orelie)\nConfection(jarvis, suki)\nConfection(jarvis, godfrey)\nBurglarise(jarvis, godfrey)\nUnburied(orelie)\nnot Burglarise(orelie, jarvis)\nEbonize(orelie, godfrey)\nConfection(suki, orelie)\nConfection(suki, godfrey)\nnot Ebonize(suki, godfrey)\nConfection(godfrey, jarvis)\nnot Confection(godfrey, orelie)\nOctangular(orelie) -> not Burglarise(orelie, jarvis)\nforall x (Burglarise(x, godfrey) -> Toughened(godfrey))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, godfrey) and Confection(godfrey, jarvis) -> not Burglarise(godfrey, orelie))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Burglarise(x, jarvis))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, orelie) -> not Ebonize(orelie, jarvis))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Ebonize(x, jarvis))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Ebonize(x, orelie))\nforall x (Burglarise(x, orelie) and not Paintable(x) -> not Funerary(x))\n\nToughened(godfrey)\n\nBurglarise(jarvis, godfrey) and forall x (Burglarise(x, godfrey) -> Toughened(godfrey)) -> therefore Toughened(godfrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The yale yack the wain. The yale yack the lennie. The yale yack the inglebert. The yale mercerize the inglebert. The wain is dying. The wain does not see the yale. The wain honey the inglebert. The lennie yack the wain. The lennie yack the inglebert. The lennie does not visit the inglebert. The inglebert yack the yale. The inglebert does not chase the wain. If the wain is asyndetic then the wain does not see the yale. If something mercerize the inglebert then the inglebert is ironclad. If something honey the inglebert and the inglebert yack the yale then the inglebert does not see the wain. If something is ironclad then it mercerize the yale. If something honey the wain then the wain does not visit the yale. If something is ironclad then it honey the yale. If something is ironclad then it honey the wain. If something mercerize the wain and it is not acarpelous then it is not consensual. The inglebert is not ironclad.", "logic": "\nYack(yale, wain)\nYack(yale, lennie)\nYack(yale, inglebert)\nMercerize(yale, inglebert)\nDying(wain)\nnot Mercerize(wain, yale)\nHoney(wain, inglebert)\nYack(lennie, wain)\nYack(lennie, inglebert)\nnot Honey(lennie, inglebert)\nYack(inglebert, yale)\nnot Yack(inglebert, wain)\nAsyndetic(wain) -> not Mercerize(wain, yale)\nforall x (Mercerize(x, inglebert) -> Ironclad(inglebert))\nforall x (Honey(x, inglebert) and Yack(inglebert, yale) -> not Mercerize(inglebert, wain))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Mercerize(x, yale))\nforall x (Honey(x, wain) -> not Honey(wain, yale))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Honey(x, yale))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Honey(x, wain))\nforall x (Mercerize(x, wain) and not Acarpelous(x) -> not Consensual(x))\n\nnot Ironclad(inglebert)\n\nMercerize(yale, inglebert) and forall x (Mercerize(x, inglebert) -> Ironclad(inglebert)) -> therefore Ironclad(inglebert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The marlee deter the alayne. The marlee deter the ruthann. The marlee deter the harrison. The marlee reassail the harrison. The alayne is backstair. The alayne does not see the marlee. The alayne elucidate the harrison. The ruthann deter the alayne. The ruthann deter the harrison. The ruthann does not visit the harrison. The harrison deter the marlee. The harrison does not chase the alayne. If the alayne is shrill then the alayne does not see the marlee. If something reassail the harrison then the harrison is debasing. If something elucidate the harrison and the harrison deter the marlee then the harrison does not see the alayne. If something is debasing then it reassail the marlee. If something elucidate the alayne then the alayne does not visit the marlee. If something is debasing then it elucidate the marlee. If something is debasing then it elucidate the alayne. If something reassail the alayne and it is not hardheaded then it is not anguished. The harrison elucidate the alayne.", "logic": "\nDeter(marlee, alayne)\nDeter(marlee, ruthann)\nDeter(marlee, harrison)\nReassail(marlee, harrison)\nBackstair(alayne)\nnot Reassail(alayne, marlee)\nElucidate(alayne, harrison)\nDeter(ruthann, alayne)\nDeter(ruthann, harrison)\nnot Elucidate(ruthann, harrison)\nDeter(harrison, marlee)\nnot Deter(harrison, alayne)\nShrill(alayne) -> not Reassail(alayne, marlee)\nforall x (Reassail(x, harrison) -> Debasing(harrison))\nforall x (Elucidate(x, harrison) and Deter(harrison, marlee) -> not Reassail(harrison, alayne))\nforall x (Debasing(x) -> Reassail(x, marlee))\nforall x (Elucidate(x, alayne) -> not Elucidate(alayne, marlee))\nforall x (Debasing(x) -> Elucidate(x, marlee))\nforall x (Debasing(x) -> Elucidate(x, alayne))\nforall x (Reassail(x, alayne) and not Hardheaded(x) -> not Anguished(x))\n\nElucidate(harrison, alayne)\n\nReassail(marlee, harrison) and forall x (Reassail(x, harrison) -> Debasing(harrison)) -> therefore Debasing(harrison) Debasing(harrison) and forall x (Debasing(x) -> Elucidate(x, alayne)) -> therefore Elucidate(harrison, alayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The lorena betide the hally. The lorena betide the gilli. The lorena betide the amelie. The lorena corrupt the amelie. The hally is absolved. The hally does not see the lorena. The hally chemisorb the amelie. The gilli betide the hally. The gilli betide the amelie. The gilli does not visit the amelie. The amelie betide the lorena. The amelie does not chase the hally. If the hally is branched then the hally does not see the lorena. If something corrupt the amelie then the amelie is tenuous. If something chemisorb the amelie and the amelie betide the lorena then the amelie does not see the hally. If something is tenuous then it corrupt the lorena. If something chemisorb the hally then the hally does not visit the lorena. If something is tenuous then it chemisorb the lorena. If something is tenuous then it chemisorb the hally. If something corrupt the hally and it is not weekly then it is not honeyed. The amelie does not see the lorena.", "logic": "\nBetide(lorena, hally)\nBetide(lorena, gilli)\nBetide(lorena, amelie)\nCorrupt(lorena, amelie)\nAbsolved(hally)\nnot Corrupt(hally, lorena)\nChemisorb(hally, amelie)\nBetide(gilli, hally)\nBetide(gilli, amelie)\nnot Chemisorb(gilli, amelie)\nBetide(amelie, lorena)\nnot Betide(amelie, hally)\nBranched(hally) -> not Corrupt(hally, lorena)\nforall x (Corrupt(x, amelie) -> Tenuous(amelie))\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, amelie) and Betide(amelie, lorena) -> not Corrupt(amelie, hally))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Corrupt(x, lorena))\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, hally) -> not Chemisorb(hally, lorena))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Chemisorb(x, lorena))\nforall x (Tenuous(x) -> Chemisorb(x, hally))\nforall x (Corrupt(x, hally) and not Weekly(x) -> not Honeyed(x))\n\nnot Corrupt(amelie, lorena)\n\nCorrupt(lorena, amelie) and forall x (Corrupt(x, amelie) -> Tenuous(amelie)) -> therefore Tenuous(amelie) Tenuous(amelie) and forall x (Tenuous(x) -> Corrupt(x, lorena)) -> therefore Corrupt(amelie, lorena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The lancelot send the thor. The lancelot send the ailee. The lancelot send the michael. The lancelot cadge the michael. The thor is posterior. The thor does not see the lancelot. The thor defer the michael. The ailee send the thor. The ailee send the michael. The ailee does not visit the michael. The michael send the lancelot. The michael does not chase the thor. If the thor is reigning then the thor does not see the lancelot. If something cadge the michael then the michael is ibsenian. If something defer the michael and the michael send the lancelot then the michael does not see the thor. If something is ibsenian then it cadge the lancelot. If something defer the thor then the thor does not visit the lancelot. If something is ibsenian then it defer the lancelot. If something is ibsenian then it defer the thor. If something cadge the thor and it is not undreamed then it is not hick. The thor does not visit the lancelot.", "logic": "\nSend(lancelot, thor)\nSend(lancelot, ailee)\nSend(lancelot, michael)\nCadge(lancelot, michael)\nPosterior(thor)\nnot Cadge(thor, lancelot)\nDefer(thor, michael)\nSend(ailee, thor)\nSend(ailee, michael)\nnot Defer(ailee, michael)\nSend(michael, lancelot)\nnot Send(michael, thor)\nReigning(thor) -> not Cadge(thor, lancelot)\nforall x (Cadge(x, michael) -> Ibsenian(michael))\nforall x (Defer(x, michael) and Send(michael, lancelot) -> not Cadge(michael, thor))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Cadge(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Defer(x, thor) -> not Defer(thor, lancelot))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Defer(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Defer(x, thor))\nforall x (Cadge(x, thor) and not Undreamed(x) -> not Hick(x))\n\nnot Defer(thor, lancelot)\n\nCadge(lancelot, michael) and forall x (Cadge(x, michael) -> Ibsenian(michael)) -> therefore Ibsenian(michael) Ibsenian(michael) and forall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Defer(x, thor)) -> therefore Defer(michael, thor) Defer(michael, thor) and forall x (Defer(x, thor) -> not Defer(thor, lancelot)) -> therefore not Defer(thor, lancelot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The jeffie glimpse the sheryl. The jeffie glimpse the kelcie. The jeffie glimpse the waring. The jeffie opalize the waring. The sheryl is veteran. The sheryl does not see the jeffie. The sheryl hiccup the waring. The kelcie glimpse the sheryl. The kelcie glimpse the waring. The kelcie does not visit the waring. The waring glimpse the jeffie. The waring does not chase the sheryl. If the sheryl is incipient then the sheryl does not see the jeffie. If something opalize the waring then the waring is backmost. If something hiccup the waring and the waring glimpse the jeffie then the waring does not see the sheryl. If something is backmost then it opalize the jeffie. If something hiccup the sheryl then the sheryl does not visit the jeffie. If something is backmost then it hiccup the jeffie. If something is backmost then it hiccup the sheryl. If something opalize the sheryl and it is not analogue then it is not monthlong. The sheryl hiccup the jeffie.", "logic": "\nGlimpse(jeffie, sheryl)\nGlimpse(jeffie, kelcie)\nGlimpse(jeffie, waring)\nOpalize(jeffie, waring)\nVeteran(sheryl)\nnot Opalize(sheryl, jeffie)\nHiccup(sheryl, waring)\nGlimpse(kelcie, sheryl)\nGlimpse(kelcie, waring)\nnot Hiccup(kelcie, waring)\nGlimpse(waring, jeffie)\nnot Glimpse(waring, sheryl)\nIncipient(sheryl) -> not Opalize(sheryl, jeffie)\nforall x (Opalize(x, waring) -> Backmost(waring))\nforall x (Hiccup(x, waring) and Glimpse(waring, jeffie) -> not Opalize(waring, sheryl))\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Opalize(x, jeffie))\nforall x (Hiccup(x, sheryl) -> not Hiccup(sheryl, jeffie))\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Hiccup(x, jeffie))\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Hiccup(x, sheryl))\nforall x (Opalize(x, sheryl) and not Analogue(x) -> not Monthlong(x))\n\nHiccup(sheryl, jeffie)\n\nOpalize(jeffie, waring) and forall x (Opalize(x, waring) -> Backmost(waring)) -> therefore Backmost(waring) Backmost(waring) and forall x (Backmost(x) -> Hiccup(x, sheryl)) -> therefore Hiccup(waring, sheryl) Hiccup(waring, sheryl) and forall x (Hiccup(x, sheryl) -> not Hiccup(sheryl, jeffie)) -> therefore not Hiccup(sheryl, jeffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The carey overspend the shurwood. The carey overspend the liliane. The carey overspend the andra. The carey bury the andra. The shurwood is boozy. The shurwood does not see the carey. The shurwood bonnet the andra. The liliane overspend the shurwood. The liliane overspend the andra. The liliane does not visit the andra. The andra overspend the carey. The andra does not chase the shurwood. If the shurwood is adrenergic then the shurwood does not see the carey. If something bury the andra then the andra is dorsal. If something bonnet the andra and the andra overspend the carey then the andra does not see the shurwood. If something is dorsal then it bury the carey. If something bonnet the shurwood then the shurwood does not visit the carey. If something is dorsal then it bonnet the carey. If something is dorsal then it bonnet the shurwood. If something bury the shurwood and it is not vermicular then it is not peccable. The carey does not see the carey.", "logic": "\nOverspend(carey, shurwood)\nOverspend(carey, liliane)\nOverspend(carey, andra)\nBury(carey, andra)\nBoozy(shurwood)\nnot Bury(shurwood, carey)\nBonnet(shurwood, andra)\nOverspend(liliane, shurwood)\nOverspend(liliane, andra)\nnot Bonnet(liliane, andra)\nOverspend(andra, carey)\nnot Overspend(andra, shurwood)\nAdrenergic(shurwood) -> not Bury(shurwood, carey)\nforall x (Bury(x, andra) -> Dorsal(andra))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, andra) and Overspend(andra, carey) -> not Bury(andra, shurwood))\nforall x (Dorsal(x) -> Bury(x, carey))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, shurwood) -> not Bonnet(shurwood, carey))\nforall x (Dorsal(x) -> Bonnet(x, carey))\nforall x (Dorsal(x) -> Bonnet(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Bury(x, shurwood) and not Vermicular(x) -> not Peccable(x))\n\nnot Bury(carey, carey)\n\nforall x (Dorsal(x) -> Bury(x, carey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The roni constringe the aloysius. The roni constringe the augustine. The roni constringe the saba. The roni accredit the saba. The aloysius is reddened. The aloysius does not see the roni. The aloysius repair the saba. The augustine constringe the aloysius. The augustine constringe the saba. The augustine does not visit the saba. The saba constringe the roni. The saba does not chase the aloysius. If the aloysius is moral then the aloysius does not see the roni. If something accredit the saba then the saba is disputed. If something repair the saba and the saba constringe the roni then the saba does not see the aloysius. If something is disputed then it accredit the roni. If something repair the aloysius then the aloysius does not visit the roni. If something is disputed then it repair the roni. If something is disputed then it repair the aloysius. If something accredit the aloysius and it is not cismontane then it is not runproof. The roni repair the aloysius.", "logic": "\nConstringe(roni, aloysius)\nConstringe(roni, augustine)\nConstringe(roni, saba)\nAccredit(roni, saba)\nReddened(aloysius)\nnot Accredit(aloysius, roni)\nRepair(aloysius, saba)\nConstringe(augustine, aloysius)\nConstringe(augustine, saba)\nnot Repair(augustine, saba)\nConstringe(saba, roni)\nnot Constringe(saba, aloysius)\nMoral(aloysius) -> not Accredit(aloysius, roni)\nforall x (Accredit(x, saba) -> Disputed(saba))\nforall x (Repair(x, saba) and Constringe(saba, roni) -> not Accredit(saba, aloysius))\nforall x (Disputed(x) -> Accredit(x, roni))\nforall x (Repair(x, aloysius) -> not Repair(aloysius, roni))\nforall x (Disputed(x) -> Repair(x, roni))\nforall x (Disputed(x) -> Repair(x, aloysius))\nforall x (Accredit(x, aloysius) and not Cismontane(x) -> not Runproof(x))\n\nRepair(roni, aloysius)\n\nforall x (Disputed(x) -> Repair(x, aloysius)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The nalani disgruntle the murielle. The nalani disgruntle the sig. The nalani disgruntle the emmey. The nalani tramp the emmey. The murielle is blighted. The murielle does not see the nalani. The murielle triumph the emmey. The sig disgruntle the murielle. The sig disgruntle the emmey. The sig does not visit the emmey. The emmey disgruntle the nalani. The emmey does not chase the murielle. If the murielle is most then the murielle does not see the nalani. If something tramp the emmey then the emmey is screechy. If something triumph the emmey and the emmey disgruntle the nalani then the emmey does not see the murielle. If something is screechy then it tramp the nalani. If something triumph the murielle then the murielle does not visit the nalani. If something is screechy then it triumph the nalani. If something is screechy then it triumph the murielle. If something tramp the murielle and it is not vegetative then it is not acapnotic. The murielle does not visit the murielle.", "logic": "\nDisgruntle(nalani, murielle)\nDisgruntle(nalani, sig)\nDisgruntle(nalani, emmey)\nTramp(nalani, emmey)\nBlighted(murielle)\nnot Tramp(murielle, nalani)\nTriumph(murielle, emmey)\nDisgruntle(sig, murielle)\nDisgruntle(sig, emmey)\nnot Triumph(sig, emmey)\nDisgruntle(emmey, nalani)\nnot Disgruntle(emmey, murielle)\nMost(murielle) -> not Tramp(murielle, nalani)\nforall x (Tramp(x, emmey) -> Screechy(emmey))\nforall x (Triumph(x, emmey) and Disgruntle(emmey, nalani) -> not Tramp(emmey, murielle))\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Tramp(x, nalani))\nforall x (Triumph(x, murielle) -> not Triumph(murielle, nalani))\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Triumph(x, nalani))\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Triumph(x, murielle))\nforall x (Tramp(x, murielle) and not Vegetative(x) -> not Acapnotic(x))\n\nnot Triumph(murielle, murielle)\n\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Triumph(x, murielle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The cornellis topple the dayna. The cornellis topple the hoyt. The cornellis topple the vin. The cornellis magnetize the vin. The dayna is respective. The dayna does not see the cornellis. The dayna maculate the vin. The hoyt topple the dayna. The hoyt topple the vin. The hoyt does not visit the vin. The vin topple the cornellis. The vin does not chase the dayna. If the dayna is attached then the dayna does not see the cornellis. If something magnetize the vin then the vin is acuminate. If something maculate the vin and the vin topple the cornellis then the vin does not see the dayna. If something is acuminate then it magnetize the cornellis. If something maculate the dayna then the dayna does not visit the cornellis. If something is acuminate then it maculate the cornellis. If something is acuminate then it maculate the dayna. If something magnetize the dayna and it is not sodden then it is not disabused. The hoyt maculate the dayna.", "logic": "\nTopple(cornellis, dayna)\nTopple(cornellis, hoyt)\nTopple(cornellis, vin)\nMagnetize(cornellis, vin)\nRespective(dayna)\nnot Magnetize(dayna, cornellis)\nMaculate(dayna, vin)\nTopple(hoyt, dayna)\nTopple(hoyt, vin)\nnot Maculate(hoyt, vin)\nTopple(vin, cornellis)\nnot Topple(vin, dayna)\nAttached(dayna) -> not Magnetize(dayna, cornellis)\nforall x (Magnetize(x, vin) -> Acuminate(vin))\nforall x (Maculate(x, vin) and Topple(vin, cornellis) -> not Magnetize(vin, dayna))\nforall x (Acuminate(x) -> Magnetize(x, cornellis))\nforall x (Maculate(x, dayna) -> not Maculate(dayna, cornellis))\nforall x (Acuminate(x) -> Maculate(x, cornellis))\nforall x (Acuminate(x) -> Maculate(x, dayna))\nforall x (Magnetize(x, dayna) and not Sodden(x) -> not Disabused(x))\n\nMaculate(hoyt, dayna)\n\nforall x (Acuminate(x) -> Maculate(x, dayna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The morlee admit the marcio. The morlee admit the nanni. The morlee admit the graehme. The morlee adumbrate the graehme. The marcio is unfertile. The marcio does not see the morlee. The marcio suborn the graehme. The nanni admit the marcio. The nanni admit the graehme. The nanni does not visit the graehme. The graehme admit the morlee. The graehme does not chase the marcio. If the marcio is tactical then the marcio does not see the morlee. If something adumbrate the graehme then the graehme is cheery. If something suborn the graehme and the graehme admit the morlee then the graehme does not see the marcio. If something is cheery then it adumbrate the morlee. If something suborn the marcio then the marcio does not visit the morlee. If something is cheery then it suborn the morlee. If something is cheery then it suborn the marcio. If something adumbrate the marcio and it is not anti then it is not clubby. The morlee is not tactical.", "logic": "\nAdmit(morlee, marcio)\nAdmit(morlee, nanni)\nAdmit(morlee, graehme)\nAdumbrate(morlee, graehme)\nUnfertile(marcio)\nnot Adumbrate(marcio, morlee)\nSuborn(marcio, graehme)\nAdmit(nanni, marcio)\nAdmit(nanni, graehme)\nnot Suborn(nanni, graehme)\nAdmit(graehme, morlee)\nnot Admit(graehme, marcio)\nTactical(marcio) -> not Adumbrate(marcio, morlee)\nforall x (Adumbrate(x, graehme) -> Cheery(graehme))\nforall x (Suborn(x, graehme) and Admit(graehme, morlee) -> not Adumbrate(graehme, marcio))\nforall x (Cheery(x) -> Adumbrate(x, morlee))\nforall x (Suborn(x, marcio) -> not Suborn(marcio, morlee))\nforall x (Cheery(x) -> Suborn(x, morlee))\nforall x (Cheery(x) -> Suborn(x, marcio))\nforall x (Adumbrate(x, marcio) and not Anti(x) -> not Clubby(x))\n\nnot Tactical(morlee)\n\nnot Tactical(morlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The rob chronicle the florella. The rob chronicle the jolyn. The rob chronicle the kingston. The rob propel the kingston. The florella is brave. The florella does not see the rob. The florella scramble the kingston. The jolyn chronicle the florella. The jolyn chronicle the kingston. The jolyn does not visit the kingston. The kingston chronicle the rob. The kingston does not chase the florella. If the florella is gobsmacked then the florella does not see the rob. If something propel the kingston then the kingston is buckram. If something scramble the kingston and the kingston chronicle the rob then the kingston does not see the florella. If something is buckram then it propel the rob. If something scramble the florella then the florella does not visit the rob. If something is buckram then it scramble the rob. If something is buckram then it scramble the florella. If something propel the florella and it is not primeval then it is not hormonal. The rob is buckram.", "logic": "\nChronicle(rob, florella)\nChronicle(rob, jolyn)\nChronicle(rob, kingston)\nPropel(rob, kingston)\nBrave(florella)\nnot Propel(florella, rob)\nScramble(florella, kingston)\nChronicle(jolyn, florella)\nChronicle(jolyn, kingston)\nnot Scramble(jolyn, kingston)\nChronicle(kingston, rob)\nnot Chronicle(kingston, florella)\nGobsmacked(florella) -> not Propel(florella, rob)\nforall x (Propel(x, kingston) -> Buckram(kingston))\nforall x (Scramble(x, kingston) and Chronicle(kingston, rob) -> not Propel(kingston, florella))\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Propel(x, rob))\nforall x (Scramble(x, florella) -> not Scramble(florella, rob))\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Scramble(x, rob))\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Scramble(x, florella))\nforall x (Propel(x, florella) and not Primeval(x) -> not Hormonal(x))\n\nBuckram(rob)\n\nBuckram(rob) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The linette photostat the iolande. The linette photostat the geri. The linette photostat the caresa. The linette mean the caresa. The iolande is twilled. The iolande does not see the linette. The iolande vociferate the caresa. The geri photostat the iolande. The geri photostat the caresa. The geri does not visit the caresa. The caresa photostat the linette. The caresa does not chase the iolande. If the iolande is pedigree then the iolande does not see the linette. If something mean the caresa then the caresa is dacitic. If something vociferate the caresa and the caresa photostat the linette then the caresa does not see the iolande. If something is dacitic then it mean the linette. If something vociferate the iolande then the iolande does not visit the linette. If something is dacitic then it vociferate the linette. If something is dacitic then it vociferate the iolande. If something mean the iolande and it is not right then it is not handled. The iolande does not visit the geri.", "logic": "\nPhotostat(linette, iolande)\nPhotostat(linette, geri)\nPhotostat(linette, caresa)\nMean(linette, caresa)\nTwilled(iolande)\nnot Mean(iolande, linette)\nVociferate(iolande, caresa)\nPhotostat(geri, iolande)\nPhotostat(geri, caresa)\nnot Vociferate(geri, caresa)\nPhotostat(caresa, linette)\nnot Photostat(caresa, iolande)\nPedigree(iolande) -> not Mean(iolande, linette)\nforall x (Mean(x, caresa) -> Dacitic(caresa))\nforall x (Vociferate(x, caresa) and Photostat(caresa, linette) -> not Mean(caresa, iolande))\nforall x (Dacitic(x) -> Mean(x, linette))\nforall x (Vociferate(x, iolande) -> not Vociferate(iolande, linette))\nforall x (Dacitic(x) -> Vociferate(x, linette))\nforall x (Dacitic(x) -> Vociferate(x, iolande))\nforall x (Mean(x, iolande) and not Right(x) -> not Handled(x))\n\nnot Vociferate(iolande, geri)\n\nnot Vociferate(iolande, geri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The tawsha create the weider. The tawsha create the garvy. The tawsha create the tarrant. The tawsha fleet the tarrant. The weider is anuric. The weider does not see the tawsha. The weider stopple the tarrant. The garvy create the weider. The garvy create the tarrant. The garvy does not visit the tarrant. The tarrant create the tawsha. The tarrant does not chase the weider. If the weider is bulbed then the weider does not see the tawsha. If something fleet the tarrant then the tarrant is creaseless. If something stopple the tarrant and the tarrant create the tawsha then the tarrant does not see the weider. If something is creaseless then it fleet the tawsha. If something stopple the weider then the weider does not visit the tawsha. If something is creaseless then it stopple the tawsha. If something is creaseless then it stopple the weider. If something fleet the weider and it is not demanding then it is not bionomic. The tawsha create the tawsha.", "logic": "\nCreate(tawsha, weider)\nCreate(tawsha, garvy)\nCreate(tawsha, tarrant)\nFleet(tawsha, tarrant)\nAnuric(weider)\nnot Fleet(weider, tawsha)\nStopple(weider, tarrant)\nCreate(garvy, weider)\nCreate(garvy, tarrant)\nnot Stopple(garvy, tarrant)\nCreate(tarrant, tawsha)\nnot Create(tarrant, weider)\nBulbed(weider) -> not Fleet(weider, tawsha)\nforall x (Fleet(x, tarrant) -> Creaseless(tarrant))\nforall x (Stopple(x, tarrant) and Create(tarrant, tawsha) -> not Fleet(tarrant, weider))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> Fleet(x, tawsha))\nforall x (Stopple(x, weider) -> not Stopple(weider, tawsha))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> Stopple(x, tawsha))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> Stopple(x, weider))\nforall x (Fleet(x, weider) and not Demanding(x) -> not Bionomic(x))\n\nCreate(tawsha, tawsha)\n\nCreate(tawsha, tawsha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The chelsae channelize the genovera. The lissa channelize the chelsae. The genovera is not systolic. The genovera is not rife. The genovera is not slaty. The genovera bawl the chelsae. The genovera station the chelsae. If someone station the genovera then they do not need the genovera. If the genovera bawl the chelsae then the genovera station the lissa. If the chelsae is monogamous and the chelsae station the genovera then the chelsae bawl the lissa. If the genovera is monogamous then the genovera is toxic. If someone station the chelsae then the chelsae is monogamous. If someone bawl the lissa then they do not chase the chelsae. If someone station the chelsae and they visit the lissa then they need the lissa. If someone is rife and they do not need the lissa then they chase the genovera. The genovera bawl the chelsae.", "logic": "\nChannelize(chelsae, genovera)\nChannelize(lissa, chelsae)\nnot Systolic(genovera)\nnot Rife(genovera)\nnot Slaty(genovera)\nBawl(genovera, chelsae)\nStation(genovera, chelsae)\nforall x (Station(x, genovera) -> not Bawl(x, genovera))\nBawl(genovera, chelsae) -> Station(genovera, lissa)\nMonogamous(chelsae) and Station(chelsae, genovera) -> Bawl(chelsae, lissa)\nMonogamous(genovera) -> Toxic(genovera)\nforall x (Station(x, chelsae) -> Monogamous(chelsae))\nforall x (Bawl(x, lissa) -> not Channelize(x, chelsae))\nforall x (Station(x, chelsae) and Station(x, lissa) -> Bawl(x, lissa))\nforall x (Rife(x) and not Bawl(x, lissa) -> Channelize(x, genovera))\n\nBawl(genovera, chelsae)\n\ntherefore Bawl(genovera, chelsae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The mable caponise the justis. The allina caponise the mable. The justis is not springless. The justis is not well. The justis is not calced. The justis winterize the mable. The justis stopper the mable. If someone stopper the justis then they do not need the justis. If the justis winterize the mable then the justis stopper the allina. If the mable is ringed and the mable stopper the justis then the mable winterize the allina. If the justis is ringed then the justis is couthy. If someone stopper the mable then the mable is ringed. If someone winterize the allina then they do not chase the mable. If someone stopper the mable and they visit the allina then they need the allina. If someone is well and they do not need the allina then they chase the justis. The justis is well.", "logic": "\nCaponise(mable, justis)\nCaponise(allina, mable)\nnot Springless(justis)\nnot Well(justis)\nnot Calced(justis)\nWinterize(justis, mable)\nStopper(justis, mable)\nforall x (Stopper(x, justis) -> not Winterize(x, justis))\nWinterize(justis, mable) -> Stopper(justis, allina)\nRinged(mable) and Stopper(mable, justis) -> Winterize(mable, allina)\nRinged(justis) -> Couthy(justis)\nforall x (Stopper(x, mable) -> Ringed(mable))\nforall x (Winterize(x, allina) -> not Caponise(x, mable))\nforall x (Stopper(x, mable) and Stopper(x, allina) -> Winterize(x, allina))\nforall x (Well(x) and not Winterize(x, allina) -> Caponise(x, justis))\n\nWell(justis)\n\ntherefore not Well(justis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The freeman bombilate the boyce. The modestine bombilate the freeman. The boyce is not overarm. The boyce is not metatarsal. The boyce is not hipless. The boyce commune the freeman. The boyce differ the freeman. If someone differ the boyce then they do not need the boyce. If the boyce commune the freeman then the boyce differ the modestine. If the freeman is authorial and the freeman differ the boyce then the freeman commune the modestine. If the boyce is authorial then the boyce is bemused. If someone differ the freeman then the freeman is authorial. If someone commune the modestine then they do not chase the freeman. If someone differ the freeman and they visit the modestine then they need the modestine. If someone is metatarsal and they do not need the modestine then they chase the boyce. The freeman is authorial.", "logic": "\nBombilate(freeman, boyce)\nBombilate(modestine, freeman)\nnot Overarm(boyce)\nnot Metatarsal(boyce)\nnot Hipless(boyce)\nCommune(boyce, freeman)\nDiffer(boyce, freeman)\nforall x (Differ(x, boyce) -> not Commune(x, boyce))\nCommune(boyce, freeman) -> Differ(boyce, modestine)\nAuthorial(freeman) and Differ(freeman, boyce) -> Commune(freeman, modestine)\nAuthorial(boyce) -> Bemused(boyce)\nforall x (Differ(x, freeman) -> Authorial(freeman))\nforall x (Commune(x, modestine) -> not Bombilate(x, freeman))\nforall x (Differ(x, freeman) and Differ(x, modestine) -> Commune(x, modestine))\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) and not Commune(x, modestine) -> Bombilate(x, boyce))\n\nAuthorial(freeman)\n\nDiffer(boyce, freeman) and forall x (Differ(x, freeman) -> Authorial(freeman)) -> therefore Authorial(freeman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The devonne clog the adena. The harv clog the devonne. The adena is not resistive. The adena is not clarion. The adena is not annulated. The adena outstare the devonne. The adena nerve the devonne. If someone nerve the adena then they do not need the adena. If the adena outstare the devonne then the adena nerve the harv. If the devonne is protected and the devonne nerve the adena then the devonne outstare the harv. If the adena is protected then the adena is turbinate. If someone nerve the devonne then the devonne is protected. If someone outstare the harv then they do not chase the devonne. If someone nerve the devonne and they visit the harv then they need the harv. If someone is clarion and they do not need the harv then they chase the adena. The adena does not visit the harv.", "logic": "\nClog(devonne, adena)\nClog(harv, devonne)\nnot Resistive(adena)\nnot Clarion(adena)\nnot Annulated(adena)\nOutstare(adena, devonne)\nNerve(adena, devonne)\nforall x (Nerve(x, adena) -> not Outstare(x, adena))\nOutstare(adena, devonne) -> Nerve(adena, harv)\nProtected(devonne) and Nerve(devonne, adena) -> Outstare(devonne, harv)\nProtected(adena) -> Turbinate(adena)\nforall x (Nerve(x, devonne) -> Protected(devonne))\nforall x (Outstare(x, harv) -> not Clog(x, devonne))\nforall x (Nerve(x, devonne) and Nerve(x, harv) -> Outstare(x, harv))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and not Outstare(x, harv) -> Clog(x, adena))\n\nnot Nerve(adena, harv)\n\nOutstare(adena, devonne) and Outstare(adena, devonne) -> Nerve(adena, harv) -> therefore Nerve(adena, harv)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The prisca staff the catharina. The bogdan staff the prisca. The catharina is not detached. The catharina is not leal. The catharina is not peristylar. The catharina assonate the prisca. The catharina skylark the prisca. If someone skylark the catharina then they do not need the catharina. If the catharina assonate the prisca then the catharina skylark the bogdan. If the prisca is monoecious and the prisca skylark the catharina then the prisca assonate the bogdan. If the catharina is monoecious then the catharina is scrabbly. If someone skylark the prisca then the prisca is monoecious. If someone assonate the bogdan then they do not chase the prisca. If someone skylark the prisca and they visit the bogdan then they need the bogdan. If someone is leal and they do not need the bogdan then they chase the catharina. The catharina assonate the bogdan.", "logic": "\nStaff(prisca, catharina)\nStaff(bogdan, prisca)\nnot Detached(catharina)\nnot Leal(catharina)\nnot Peristylar(catharina)\nAssonate(catharina, prisca)\nSkylark(catharina, prisca)\nforall x (Skylark(x, catharina) -> not Assonate(x, catharina))\nAssonate(catharina, prisca) -> Skylark(catharina, bogdan)\nMonoecious(prisca) and Skylark(prisca, catharina) -> Assonate(prisca, bogdan)\nMonoecious(catharina) -> Scrabbly(catharina)\nforall x (Skylark(x, prisca) -> Monoecious(prisca))\nforall x (Assonate(x, bogdan) -> not Staff(x, prisca))\nforall x (Skylark(x, prisca) and Skylark(x, bogdan) -> Assonate(x, bogdan))\nforall x (Leal(x) and not Assonate(x, bogdan) -> Staff(x, catharina))\n\nAssonate(catharina, bogdan)\n\nAssonate(catharina, prisca) and Assonate(catharina, prisca) -> Skylark(catharina, bogdan) -> therefore Skylark(catharina, bogdan) Skylark(catharina, prisca) and Skylark(catharina, bogdan) and forall x (Skylark(x, prisca) and Skylark(x, bogdan) -> Assonate(x, bogdan)) -> therefore Assonate(catharina, bogdan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The miquela denature the lori. The cabrina denature the miquela. The lori is not epimorphic. The lori is not weird. The lori is not abeyant. The lori simplify the miquela. The lori frustrate the miquela. If someone frustrate the lori then they do not need the lori. If the lori simplify the miquela then the lori frustrate the cabrina. If the miquela is murine and the miquela frustrate the lori then the miquela simplify the cabrina. If the lori is murine then the lori is resistant. If someone frustrate the miquela then the miquela is murine. If someone simplify the cabrina then they do not chase the miquela. If someone frustrate the miquela and they visit the cabrina then they need the cabrina. If someone is weird and they do not need the cabrina then they chase the lori. The lori does not need the cabrina.", "logic": "\nDenature(miquela, lori)\nDenature(cabrina, miquela)\nnot Epimorphic(lori)\nnot Weird(lori)\nnot Abeyant(lori)\nSimplify(lori, miquela)\nFrustrate(lori, miquela)\nforall x (Frustrate(x, lori) -> not Simplify(x, lori))\nSimplify(lori, miquela) -> Frustrate(lori, cabrina)\nMurine(miquela) and Frustrate(miquela, lori) -> Simplify(miquela, cabrina)\nMurine(lori) -> Resistant(lori)\nforall x (Frustrate(x, miquela) -> Murine(miquela))\nforall x (Simplify(x, cabrina) -> not Denature(x, miquela))\nforall x (Frustrate(x, miquela) and Frustrate(x, cabrina) -> Simplify(x, cabrina))\nforall x (Weird(x) and not Simplify(x, cabrina) -> Denature(x, lori))\n\nnot Simplify(lori, cabrina)\n\nSimplify(lori, miquela) and Simplify(lori, miquela) -> Frustrate(lori, cabrina) -> therefore Frustrate(lori, cabrina) Frustrate(lori, miquela) and Frustrate(lori, cabrina) and forall x (Frustrate(x, miquela) and Frustrate(x, cabrina) -> Simplify(x, cabrina)) -> therefore Simplify(lori, cabrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The farley expect the nissy. The alisun expect the farley. The nissy is not besotted. The nissy is not unrevealed. The nissy is not autarchic. The nissy reappear the farley. The nissy depart the farley. If someone depart the nissy then they do not need the nissy. If the nissy reappear the farley then the nissy depart the alisun. If the farley is disunited and the farley depart the nissy then the farley reappear the alisun. If the nissy is disunited then the nissy is stirring. If someone depart the farley then the farley is disunited. If someone reappear the alisun then they do not chase the farley. If someone depart the farley and they visit the alisun then they need the alisun. If someone is unrevealed and they do not need the alisun then they chase the nissy. The nissy does not chase the farley.", "logic": "\nExpect(farley, nissy)\nExpect(alisun, farley)\nnot Besotted(nissy)\nnot Unrevealed(nissy)\nnot Autarchic(nissy)\nReappear(nissy, farley)\nDepart(nissy, farley)\nforall x (Depart(x, nissy) -> not Reappear(x, nissy))\nReappear(nissy, farley) -> Depart(nissy, alisun)\nDisunited(farley) and Depart(farley, nissy) -> Reappear(farley, alisun)\nDisunited(nissy) -> Stirring(nissy)\nforall x (Depart(x, farley) -> Disunited(farley))\nforall x (Reappear(x, alisun) -> not Expect(x, farley))\nforall x (Depart(x, farley) and Depart(x, alisun) -> Reappear(x, alisun))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) and not Reappear(x, alisun) -> Expect(x, nissy))\n\nnot Expect(nissy, farley)\n\nReappear(nissy, farley) and Reappear(nissy, farley) -> Depart(nissy, alisun) -> therefore Depart(nissy, alisun) Depart(nissy, farley) and Depart(nissy, alisun) and forall x (Depart(x, farley) and Depart(x, alisun) -> Reappear(x, alisun)) -> therefore Reappear(nissy, alisun) Reappear(nissy, alisun) and forall x (Reappear(x, alisun) -> not Expect(x, farley)) -> therefore not Expect(nissy, farley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The leanne belabour the eudora. The elana belabour the leanne. The eudora is not forgivable. The eudora is not calyptrate. The eudora is not ascribable. The eudora untwist the leanne. The eudora free the leanne. If someone free the eudora then they do not need the eudora. If the eudora untwist the leanne then the eudora free the elana. If the leanne is dour and the leanne free the eudora then the leanne untwist the elana. If the eudora is dour then the eudora is unsmoothed. If someone free the leanne then the leanne is dour. If someone untwist the elana then they do not chase the leanne. If someone free the leanne and they visit the elana then they need the elana. If someone is calyptrate and they do not need the elana then they chase the eudora. The eudora belabour the leanne.", "logic": "\nBelabour(leanne, eudora)\nBelabour(elana, leanne)\nnot Forgivable(eudora)\nnot Calyptrate(eudora)\nnot Ascribable(eudora)\nUntwist(eudora, leanne)\nFree(eudora, leanne)\nforall x (Free(x, eudora) -> not Untwist(x, eudora))\nUntwist(eudora, leanne) -> Free(eudora, elana)\nDour(leanne) and Free(leanne, eudora) -> Untwist(leanne, elana)\nDour(eudora) -> Unsmoothed(eudora)\nforall x (Free(x, leanne) -> Dour(leanne))\nforall x (Untwist(x, elana) -> not Belabour(x, leanne))\nforall x (Free(x, leanne) and Free(x, elana) -> Untwist(x, elana))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) and not Untwist(x, elana) -> Belabour(x, eudora))\n\nBelabour(eudora, leanne)\n\nUntwist(eudora, leanne) and Untwist(eudora, leanne) -> Free(eudora, elana) -> therefore Free(eudora, elana) Free(eudora, leanne) and Free(eudora, elana) and forall x (Free(x, leanne) and Free(x, elana) -> Untwist(x, elana)) -> therefore Untwist(eudora, elana) Untwist(eudora, elana) and forall x (Untwist(x, elana) -> not Belabour(x, leanne)) -> therefore not Belabour(eudora, leanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The yance thicken the worthy. The minetta thicken the yance. The worthy is not decreasing. The worthy is not donnish. The worthy is not autocratic. The worthy becalm the yance. The worthy overreact the yance. If someone overreact the worthy then they do not need the worthy. If the worthy becalm the yance then the worthy overreact the minetta. If the yance is official and the yance overreact the worthy then the yance becalm the minetta. If the worthy is official then the worthy is crustal. If someone overreact the yance then the yance is official. If someone becalm the minetta then they do not chase the yance. If someone overreact the yance and they visit the minetta then they need the minetta. If someone is donnish and they do not need the minetta then they chase the worthy. The yance does not need the minetta.", "logic": "\nThicken(yance, worthy)\nThicken(minetta, yance)\nnot Decreasing(worthy)\nnot Donnish(worthy)\nnot Autocratic(worthy)\nBecalm(worthy, yance)\nOverreact(worthy, yance)\nforall x (Overreact(x, worthy) -> not Becalm(x, worthy))\nBecalm(worthy, yance) -> Overreact(worthy, minetta)\nOfficial(yance) and Overreact(yance, worthy) -> Becalm(yance, minetta)\nOfficial(worthy) -> Crustal(worthy)\nforall x (Overreact(x, yance) -> Official(yance))\nforall x (Becalm(x, minetta) -> not Thicken(x, yance))\nforall x (Overreact(x, yance) and Overreact(x, minetta) -> Becalm(x, minetta))\nforall x (Donnish(x) and not Becalm(x, minetta) -> Thicken(x, worthy))\n\nnot Becalm(yance, minetta)\n\nOfficial(yance) and Overreact(yance, worthy) -> Becalm(yance, minetta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The lyndsay sublease the mariette. The armand sublease the lyndsay. The mariette is not antennal. The mariette is not nascent. The mariette is not blase. The mariette rhumba the lyndsay. The mariette permute the lyndsay. If someone permute the mariette then they do not need the mariette. If the mariette rhumba the lyndsay then the mariette permute the armand. If the lyndsay is perceptive and the lyndsay permute the mariette then the lyndsay rhumba the armand. If the mariette is perceptive then the mariette is disparate. If someone permute the lyndsay then the lyndsay is perceptive. If someone rhumba the armand then they do not chase the lyndsay. If someone permute the lyndsay and they visit the armand then they need the armand. If someone is nascent and they do not need the armand then they chase the mariette. The mariette is disparate.", "logic": "\nSublease(lyndsay, mariette)\nSublease(armand, lyndsay)\nnot Antennal(mariette)\nnot Nascent(mariette)\nnot Blase(mariette)\nRhumba(mariette, lyndsay)\nPermute(mariette, lyndsay)\nforall x (Permute(x, mariette) -> not Rhumba(x, mariette))\nRhumba(mariette, lyndsay) -> Permute(mariette, armand)\nPerceptive(lyndsay) and Permute(lyndsay, mariette) -> Rhumba(lyndsay, armand)\nPerceptive(mariette) -> Disparate(mariette)\nforall x (Permute(x, lyndsay) -> Perceptive(lyndsay))\nforall x (Rhumba(x, armand) -> not Sublease(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Permute(x, lyndsay) and Permute(x, armand) -> Rhumba(x, armand))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and not Rhumba(x, armand) -> Sublease(x, mariette))\n\nDisparate(mariette)\n\nPerceptive(mariette) -> Disparate(mariette) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The missie thump the ophelie. The stavros thump the missie. The ophelie is not bushed. The ophelie is not furled. The ophelie is not pivotal. The ophelie dupe the missie. The ophelie ward the missie. If someone ward the ophelie then they do not need the ophelie. If the ophelie dupe the missie then the ophelie ward the stavros. If the missie is spectacled and the missie ward the ophelie then the missie dupe the stavros. If the ophelie is spectacled then the ophelie is gassy. If someone ward the missie then the missie is spectacled. If someone dupe the stavros then they do not chase the missie. If someone ward the missie and they visit the stavros then they need the stavros. If someone is furled and they do not need the stavros then they chase the ophelie. The ophelie does not chase the ophelie.", "logic": "\nThump(missie, ophelie)\nThump(stavros, missie)\nnot Bushed(ophelie)\nnot Furled(ophelie)\nnot Pivotal(ophelie)\nDupe(ophelie, missie)\nWard(ophelie, missie)\nforall x (Ward(x, ophelie) -> not Dupe(x, ophelie))\nDupe(ophelie, missie) -> Ward(ophelie, stavros)\nSpectacled(missie) and Ward(missie, ophelie) -> Dupe(missie, stavros)\nSpectacled(ophelie) -> Gassy(ophelie)\nforall x (Ward(x, missie) -> Spectacled(missie))\nforall x (Dupe(x, stavros) -> not Thump(x, missie))\nforall x (Ward(x, missie) and Ward(x, stavros) -> Dupe(x, stavros))\nforall x (Furled(x) and not Dupe(x, stavros) -> Thump(x, ophelie))\n\nnot Thump(ophelie, ophelie)\n\nforall x (Furled(x) and not Dupe(x, stavros) -> Thump(x, ophelie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The lora rede the maryellen. The robbi rede the lora. The maryellen is not cuspidal. The maryellen is not lowland. The maryellen is not gratifying. The maryellen smudge the lora. The maryellen unmask the lora. If someone unmask the maryellen then they do not need the maryellen. If the maryellen smudge the lora then the maryellen unmask the robbi. If the lora is aboulic and the lora unmask the maryellen then the lora smudge the robbi. If the maryellen is aboulic then the maryellen is unethical. If someone unmask the lora then the lora is aboulic. If someone smudge the robbi then they do not chase the lora. If someone unmask the lora and they visit the robbi then they need the robbi. If someone is lowland and they do not need the robbi then they chase the maryellen. The robbi smudge the robbi.", "logic": "\nRede(lora, maryellen)\nRede(robbi, lora)\nnot Cuspidal(maryellen)\nnot Lowland(maryellen)\nnot Gratifying(maryellen)\nSmudge(maryellen, lora)\nUnmask(maryellen, lora)\nforall x (Unmask(x, maryellen) -> not Smudge(x, maryellen))\nSmudge(maryellen, lora) -> Unmask(maryellen, robbi)\nAboulic(lora) and Unmask(lora, maryellen) -> Smudge(lora, robbi)\nAboulic(maryellen) -> Unethical(maryellen)\nforall x (Unmask(x, lora) -> Aboulic(lora))\nforall x (Smudge(x, robbi) -> not Rede(x, lora))\nforall x (Unmask(x, lora) and Unmask(x, robbi) -> Smudge(x, robbi))\nforall x (Lowland(x) and not Smudge(x, robbi) -> Rede(x, maryellen))\n\nSmudge(robbi, robbi)\n\nforall x (Unmask(x, lora) and Unmask(x, robbi) -> Smudge(x, robbi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The anatollo unstuff the lorilee. The suzan unstuff the anatollo. The lorilee is not inelastic. The lorilee is not unlobed. The lorilee is not healthier. The lorilee dress the anatollo. The lorilee embargo the anatollo. If someone embargo the lorilee then they do not need the lorilee. If the lorilee dress the anatollo then the lorilee embargo the suzan. If the anatollo is mural and the anatollo embargo the lorilee then the anatollo dress the suzan. If the lorilee is mural then the lorilee is cautionary. If someone embargo the anatollo then the anatollo is mural. If someone dress the suzan then they do not chase the anatollo. If someone embargo the anatollo and they visit the suzan then they need the suzan. If someone is unlobed and they do not need the suzan then they chase the lorilee. The anatollo does not need the anatollo.", "logic": "\nUnstuff(anatollo, lorilee)\nUnstuff(suzan, anatollo)\nnot Inelastic(lorilee)\nnot Unlobed(lorilee)\nnot Healthier(lorilee)\nDress(lorilee, anatollo)\nEmbargo(lorilee, anatollo)\nforall x (Embargo(x, lorilee) -> not Dress(x, lorilee))\nDress(lorilee, anatollo) -> Embargo(lorilee, suzan)\nMural(anatollo) and Embargo(anatollo, lorilee) -> Dress(anatollo, suzan)\nMural(lorilee) -> Cautionary(lorilee)\nforall x (Embargo(x, anatollo) -> Mural(anatollo))\nforall x (Dress(x, suzan) -> not Unstuff(x, anatollo))\nforall x (Embargo(x, anatollo) and Embargo(x, suzan) -> Dress(x, suzan))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) and not Dress(x, suzan) -> Unstuff(x, lorilee))\n\nnot Dress(anatollo, anatollo)\n\nnot Dress(anatollo, anatollo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The shaylah premier the leonanie. The gabriello premier the shaylah. The leonanie is not allometric. The leonanie is not rotten. The leonanie is not notorious. The leonanie conspire the shaylah. The leonanie kotow the shaylah. If someone kotow the leonanie then they do not need the leonanie. If the leonanie conspire the shaylah then the leonanie kotow the gabriello. If the shaylah is nonchalant and the shaylah kotow the leonanie then the shaylah conspire the gabriello. If the leonanie is nonchalant then the leonanie is segmental. If someone kotow the shaylah then the shaylah is nonchalant. If someone conspire the gabriello then they do not chase the shaylah. If someone kotow the shaylah and they visit the gabriello then they need the gabriello. If someone is rotten and they do not need the gabriello then they chase the leonanie. The gabriello conspire the shaylah.", "logic": "\nPremier(shaylah, leonanie)\nPremier(gabriello, shaylah)\nnot Allometric(leonanie)\nnot Rotten(leonanie)\nnot Notorious(leonanie)\nConspire(leonanie, shaylah)\nKotow(leonanie, shaylah)\nforall x (Kotow(x, leonanie) -> not Conspire(x, leonanie))\nConspire(leonanie, shaylah) -> Kotow(leonanie, gabriello)\nNonchalant(shaylah) and Kotow(shaylah, leonanie) -> Conspire(shaylah, gabriello)\nNonchalant(leonanie) -> Segmental(leonanie)\nforall x (Kotow(x, shaylah) -> Nonchalant(shaylah))\nforall x (Conspire(x, gabriello) -> not Premier(x, shaylah))\nforall x (Kotow(x, shaylah) and Kotow(x, gabriello) -> Conspire(x, gabriello))\nforall x (Rotten(x) and not Conspire(x, gabriello) -> Premier(x, leonanie))\n\nConspire(gabriello, shaylah)\n\nConspire(gabriello, shaylah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The tracee report the rebekkah. The josef report the tracee. The rebekkah is not prodromal. The rebekkah is not placative. The rebekkah is not hematic. The rebekkah clack the tracee. The rebekkah hydrolize the tracee. If someone hydrolize the rebekkah then they do not need the rebekkah. If the rebekkah clack the tracee then the rebekkah hydrolize the josef. If the tracee is atrial and the tracee hydrolize the rebekkah then the tracee clack the josef. If the rebekkah is atrial then the rebekkah is edentulate. If someone hydrolize the tracee then the tracee is atrial. If someone clack the josef then they do not chase the tracee. If someone hydrolize the tracee and they visit the josef then they need the josef. If someone is placative and they do not need the josef then they chase the rebekkah. The tracee does not need the rebekkah.", "logic": "\nReport(tracee, rebekkah)\nReport(josef, tracee)\nnot Prodromal(rebekkah)\nnot Placative(rebekkah)\nnot Hematic(rebekkah)\nClack(rebekkah, tracee)\nHydrolize(rebekkah, tracee)\nforall x (Hydrolize(x, rebekkah) -> not Clack(x, rebekkah))\nClack(rebekkah, tracee) -> Hydrolize(rebekkah, josef)\nAtrial(tracee) and Hydrolize(tracee, rebekkah) -> Clack(tracee, josef)\nAtrial(rebekkah) -> Edentulate(rebekkah)\nforall x (Hydrolize(x, tracee) -> Atrial(tracee))\nforall x (Clack(x, josef) -> not Report(x, tracee))\nforall x (Hydrolize(x, tracee) and Hydrolize(x, josef) -> Clack(x, josef))\nforall x (Placative(x) and not Clack(x, josef) -> Report(x, rebekkah))\n\nnot Clack(tracee, rebekkah)\n\nnot Clack(tracee, rebekkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The maure pompadour the eveleen. The danice pompadour the maure. The eveleen is not suety. The eveleen is not fuscous. The eveleen is not gilbertian. The eveleen flour the maure. The eveleen billow the maure. If someone billow the eveleen then they do not need the eveleen. If the eveleen flour the maure then the eveleen billow the danice. If the maure is boisterous and the maure billow the eveleen then the maure flour the danice. If the eveleen is boisterous then the eveleen is repayable. If someone billow the maure then the maure is boisterous. If someone flour the danice then they do not chase the maure. If someone billow the maure and they visit the danice then they need the danice. If someone is fuscous and they do not need the danice then they chase the eveleen. The danice is boisterous.", "logic": "\nPompadour(maure, eveleen)\nPompadour(danice, maure)\nnot Suety(eveleen)\nnot Fuscous(eveleen)\nnot Gilbertian(eveleen)\nFlour(eveleen, maure)\nBillow(eveleen, maure)\nforall x (Billow(x, eveleen) -> not Flour(x, eveleen))\nFlour(eveleen, maure) -> Billow(eveleen, danice)\nBoisterous(maure) and Billow(maure, eveleen) -> Flour(maure, danice)\nBoisterous(eveleen) -> Repayable(eveleen)\nforall x (Billow(x, maure) -> Boisterous(maure))\nforall x (Flour(x, danice) -> not Pompadour(x, maure))\nforall x (Billow(x, maure) and Billow(x, danice) -> Flour(x, danice))\nforall x (Fuscous(x) and not Flour(x, danice) -> Pompadour(x, eveleen))\n\nBoisterous(danice)\n\nBoisterous(danice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "Billie is whacking. Billie is pizzicato. Beverlee is wobbling. Beverlee is upcoming. Beverlee is whacking. Beverlee is sinhalese. Parke is sinhalese. Abbie is upcoming. Abbie is gnomish. Abbie is pizzicato. All pizzicato things are gnomish. If something is protrusive then it is wobbling. All whacking, sinhalese things are gnomish. If something is whacking then it is wobbling. All upcoming, sinhalese things are gnomish. If something is whacking and upcoming then it is sinhalese. If something is wobbling then it is upcoming. Red, whacking things are gnomish. Beverlee is whacking.", "logic": "\nWhacking(billie)\nPizzicato(billie)\nWobbling(beverlee)\nUpcoming(beverlee)\nWhacking(beverlee)\nSinhalese(beverlee)\nSinhalese(parke)\nUpcoming(abbie)\nGnomish(abbie)\nPizzicato(abbie)\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Whacking(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Whacking(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Whacking(x) and Upcoming(x) -> Sinhalese(x))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) -> Upcoming(x))\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Whacking(x) -> Gnomish(x))\n\nWhacking(beverlee)\n\ntherefore Whacking(beverlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Anurag is prismatic. Anurag is mandibular. Royal is christless. Royal is unbound. Royal is prismatic. Royal is paralyzed. Craig is paralyzed. Mellissa is unbound. Mellissa is laconic. Mellissa is mandibular. All mandibular things are laconic. If something is unsweet then it is christless. All prismatic, paralyzed things are laconic. If something is prismatic then it is christless. All unbound, paralyzed things are laconic. If something is prismatic and unbound then it is paralyzed. If something is christless then it is unbound. Red, prismatic things are laconic. Anurag is not mandibular.", "logic": "\nPrismatic(anurag)\nMandibular(anurag)\nChristless(royal)\nUnbound(royal)\nPrismatic(royal)\nParalyzed(royal)\nParalyzed(craig)\nUnbound(mellissa)\nLaconic(mellissa)\nMandibular(mellissa)\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Laconic(x))\nforall x (Unsweet(x) -> Christless(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) and Paralyzed(x) -> Laconic(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) -> Christless(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) and Paralyzed(x) -> Laconic(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) and Unbound(x) -> Paralyzed(x))\nforall x (Christless(x) -> Unbound(x))\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) and Prismatic(x) -> Laconic(x))\n\nnot Mandibular(anurag)\n\ntherefore Mandibular(anurag)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Aldis is philatelic. Aldis is consequent. Matilda is packed. Matilda is threefold. Matilda is philatelic. Matilda is zaftig. Eliza is zaftig. Annadiane is threefold. Annadiane is nonspatial. Annadiane is consequent. All consequent things are nonspatial. If something is bouffant then it is packed. All philatelic, zaftig things are nonspatial. If something is philatelic then it is packed. All threefold, zaftig things are nonspatial. If something is philatelic and threefold then it is zaftig. If something is packed then it is threefold. Red, philatelic things are nonspatial. Aldis is packed.", "logic": "\nPhilatelic(aldis)\nConsequent(aldis)\nPacked(matilda)\nThreefold(matilda)\nPhilatelic(matilda)\nZaftig(matilda)\nZaftig(eliza)\nThreefold(annadiane)\nNonspatial(annadiane)\nConsequent(annadiane)\nforall x (Consequent(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Bouffant(x) -> Packed(x))\nforall x (Philatelic(x) and Zaftig(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Philatelic(x) -> Packed(x))\nforall x (Threefold(x) and Zaftig(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Philatelic(x) and Threefold(x) -> Zaftig(x))\nforall x (Packed(x) -> Threefold(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\n\nPacked(aldis)\n\nPhilatelic(aldis) and forall x (Philatelic(x) -> Packed(x)) -> therefore Packed(aldis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Alameda is meritless. Alameda is aerophilic. Jermayne is mortgaged. Jermayne is vicarious. Jermayne is meritless. Jermayne is adapted. Adair is adapted. Rainer is vicarious. Rainer is pointed. Rainer is aerophilic. All aerophilic things are pointed. If something is mislabeled then it is mortgaged. All meritless, adapted things are pointed. If something is meritless then it is mortgaged. All vicarious, adapted things are pointed. If something is meritless and vicarious then it is adapted. If something is mortgaged then it is vicarious. Red, meritless things are pointed. Alameda is not pointed.", "logic": "\nMeritless(alameda)\nAerophilic(alameda)\nMortgaged(jermayne)\nVicarious(jermayne)\nMeritless(jermayne)\nAdapted(jermayne)\nAdapted(adair)\nVicarious(rainer)\nPointed(rainer)\nAerophilic(rainer)\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Pointed(x))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Meritless(x) and Adapted(x) -> Pointed(x))\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) and Adapted(x) -> Pointed(x))\nforall x (Meritless(x) and Vicarious(x) -> Adapted(x))\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) and Meritless(x) -> Pointed(x))\n\nnot Pointed(alameda)\n\nAerophilic(alameda) and forall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Pointed(x)) -> therefore Pointed(alameda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Cyrill is alexic. Cyrill is dizygotic. Aida is monied. Aida is lashing. Aida is alexic. Aida is crustose. Wye is crustose. Newton is lashing. Newton is umbrageous. Newton is dizygotic. All dizygotic things are umbrageous. If something is blamable then it is monied. All alexic, crustose things are umbrageous. If something is alexic then it is monied. All lashing, crustose things are umbrageous. If something is alexic and lashing then it is crustose. If something is monied then it is lashing. Red, alexic things are umbrageous. Cyrill is lashing.", "logic": "\nAlexic(cyrill)\nDizygotic(cyrill)\nMonied(aida)\nLashing(aida)\nAlexic(aida)\nCrustose(aida)\nCrustose(wye)\nLashing(newton)\nUmbrageous(newton)\nDizygotic(newton)\nforall x (Dizygotic(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\nforall x (Blamable(x) -> Monied(x))\nforall x (Alexic(x) and Crustose(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\nforall x (Alexic(x) -> Monied(x))\nforall x (Lashing(x) and Crustose(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\nforall x (Alexic(x) and Lashing(x) -> Crustose(x))\nforall x (Monied(x) -> Lashing(x))\nforall x (Crustose(x) and Alexic(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\n\nLashing(cyrill)\n\nAlexic(cyrill) and forall x (Alexic(x) -> Monied(x)) -> therefore Monied(cyrill) Monied(cyrill) and forall x (Monied(x) -> Lashing(x)) -> therefore Lashing(cyrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Tiffanie is batty. Tiffanie is aerated. Jaine is drawn. Jaine is saxon. Jaine is batty. Jaine is virgin. Roselle is virgin. Caril is saxon. Caril is unworried. Caril is aerated. All aerated things are unworried. If something is quizzical then it is drawn. All batty, virgin things are unworried. If something is batty then it is drawn. All saxon, virgin things are unworried. If something is batty and saxon then it is virgin. If something is drawn then it is saxon. Red, batty things are unworried. Tiffanie is not saxon.", "logic": "\nBatty(tiffanie)\nAerated(tiffanie)\nDrawn(jaine)\nSaxon(jaine)\nBatty(jaine)\nVirgin(jaine)\nVirgin(roselle)\nSaxon(caril)\nUnworried(caril)\nAerated(caril)\nforall x (Aerated(x) -> Unworried(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Batty(x) and Virgin(x) -> Unworried(x))\nforall x (Batty(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Saxon(x) and Virgin(x) -> Unworried(x))\nforall x (Batty(x) and Saxon(x) -> Virgin(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Saxon(x))\nforall x (Virgin(x) and Batty(x) -> Unworried(x))\n\nnot Saxon(tiffanie)\n\nBatty(tiffanie) and forall x (Batty(x) -> Drawn(x)) -> therefore Drawn(tiffanie) Drawn(tiffanie) and forall x (Drawn(x) -> Saxon(x)) -> therefore Saxon(tiffanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Woody is tumultuous. Woody is willowy. Joab is boiled. Joab is backhand. Joab is tumultuous. Joab is unmingled. Josiah is unmingled. Edouard is backhand. Edouard is swelled. Edouard is willowy. All willowy things are swelled. If something is alliaceous then it is boiled. All tumultuous, unmingled things are swelled. If something is tumultuous then it is boiled. All backhand, unmingled things are swelled. If something is tumultuous and backhand then it is unmingled. If something is boiled then it is backhand. Red, tumultuous things are swelled. Woody is unmingled.", "logic": "\nTumultuous(woody)\nWillowy(woody)\nBoiled(joab)\nBackhand(joab)\nTumultuous(joab)\nUnmingled(joab)\nUnmingled(josiah)\nBackhand(edouard)\nSwelled(edouard)\nWillowy(edouard)\nforall x (Willowy(x) -> Swelled(x))\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) and Unmingled(x) -> Swelled(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Backhand(x) and Unmingled(x) -> Swelled(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) and Backhand(x) -> Unmingled(x))\nforall x (Boiled(x) -> Backhand(x))\nforall x (Unmingled(x) and Tumultuous(x) -> Swelled(x))\n\nUnmingled(woody)\n\nTumultuous(woody) and forall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Boiled(x)) -> therefore Boiled(woody) Boiled(woody) and forall x (Boiled(x) -> Backhand(x)) -> therefore Backhand(woody) Tumultuous(woody) and Backhand(woody) and forall x (Tumultuous(x) and Backhand(x) -> Unmingled(x)) -> therefore Unmingled(woody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Lucretia is clipped. Lucretia is appositive. Tamarah is apophyseal. Tamarah is lucid. Tamarah is clipped. Tamarah is slav. Barny is slav. Matthieu is lucid. Matthieu is cutting. Matthieu is appositive. All appositive things are cutting. If something is eutrophic then it is apophyseal. All clipped, slav things are cutting. If something is clipped then it is apophyseal. All lucid, slav things are cutting. If something is clipped and lucid then it is slav. If something is apophyseal then it is lucid. Red, clipped things are cutting. Lucretia is not slav.", "logic": "\nClipped(lucretia)\nAppositive(lucretia)\nApophyseal(tamarah)\nLucid(tamarah)\nClipped(tamarah)\nSlav(tamarah)\nSlav(barny)\nLucid(matthieu)\nCutting(matthieu)\nAppositive(matthieu)\nforall x (Appositive(x) -> Cutting(x))\nforall x (Eutrophic(x) -> Apophyseal(x))\nforall x (Clipped(x) and Slav(x) -> Cutting(x))\nforall x (Clipped(x) -> Apophyseal(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) and Slav(x) -> Cutting(x))\nforall x (Clipped(x) and Lucid(x) -> Slav(x))\nforall x (Apophyseal(x) -> Lucid(x))\nforall x (Slav(x) and Clipped(x) -> Cutting(x))\n\nnot Slav(lucretia)\n\nClipped(lucretia) and forall x (Clipped(x) -> Apophyseal(x)) -> therefore Apophyseal(lucretia) Apophyseal(lucretia) and forall x (Apophyseal(x) -> Lucid(x)) -> therefore Lucid(lucretia) Clipped(lucretia) and Lucid(lucretia) and forall x (Clipped(x) and Lucid(x) -> Slav(x)) -> therefore Slav(lucretia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Faythe is evanescent. Faythe is coccoid. Clerissa is sculptural. Clerissa is splendid. Clerissa is evanescent. Clerissa is spindly. Janeczka is spindly. Tulley is splendid. Tulley is laden. Tulley is coccoid. All coccoid things are laden. If something is oblivious then it is sculptural. All evanescent, spindly things are laden. If something is evanescent then it is sculptural. All splendid, spindly things are laden. If something is evanescent and splendid then it is spindly. If something is sculptural then it is splendid. Red, evanescent things are laden. Janeczka is not sculptural.", "logic": "\nEvanescent(faythe)\nCoccoid(faythe)\nSculptural(clerissa)\nSplendid(clerissa)\nEvanescent(clerissa)\nSpindly(clerissa)\nSpindly(janeczka)\nSplendid(tulley)\nLaden(tulley)\nCoccoid(tulley)\nforall x (Coccoid(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Oblivious(x) -> Sculptural(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) and Spindly(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) -> Sculptural(x))\nforall x (Splendid(x) and Spindly(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) and Splendid(x) -> Spindly(x))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) -> Splendid(x))\nforall x (Spindly(x) and Evanescent(x) -> Laden(x))\n\nnot Sculptural(janeczka)\n\nforall x (Oblivious(x) -> Sculptural(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Callida is abridged. Callida is orienting. Lanette is qatari. Lanette is procumbent. Lanette is abridged. Lanette is geologic. Tanney is geologic. Laney is procumbent. Laney is anisogamic. Laney is orienting. All orienting things are anisogamic. If something is corky then it is qatari. All abridged, geologic things are anisogamic. If something is abridged then it is qatari. All procumbent, geologic things are anisogamic. If something is abridged and procumbent then it is geologic. If something is qatari then it is procumbent. Red, abridged things are anisogamic. Laney is geologic.", "logic": "\nAbridged(callida)\nOrienting(callida)\nQatari(lanette)\nProcumbent(lanette)\nAbridged(lanette)\nGeologic(lanette)\nGeologic(tanney)\nProcumbent(laney)\nAnisogamic(laney)\nOrienting(laney)\nforall x (Orienting(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) and Geologic(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Procumbent(x) and Geologic(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) and Procumbent(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Qatari(x) -> Procumbent(x))\nforall x (Geologic(x) and Abridged(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\n\nGeologic(laney)\n\nforall x (Abridged(x) and Procumbent(x) -> Geologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Clarie is bacteremic. Clarie is culinary. Lesya is foliolate. Lesya is biotitic. Lesya is bacteremic. Lesya is aboral. Marj is aboral. Cassandre is biotitic. Cassandre is eight. Cassandre is culinary. All culinary things are eight. If something is supernal then it is foliolate. All bacteremic, aboral things are eight. If something is bacteremic then it is foliolate. All biotitic, aboral things are eight. If something is bacteremic and biotitic then it is aboral. If something is foliolate then it is biotitic. Red, bacteremic things are eight. Marj is not eight.", "logic": "\nBacteremic(clarie)\nCulinary(clarie)\nFoliolate(lesya)\nBiotitic(lesya)\nBacteremic(lesya)\nAboral(lesya)\nAboral(marj)\nBiotitic(cassandre)\nEight(cassandre)\nCulinary(cassandre)\nforall x (Culinary(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Supernal(x) -> Foliolate(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) and Aboral(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) -> Foliolate(x))\nforall x (Biotitic(x) and Aboral(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) and Biotitic(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Foliolate(x) -> Biotitic(x))\nforall x (Aboral(x) and Bacteremic(x) -> Eight(x))\n\nnot Eight(marj)\n\nforall x (Biotitic(x) and Aboral(x) -> Eight(x)) <- forall x (Foliolate(x) -> Biotitic(x)) <- forall x (Supernal(x) -> Foliolate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Sollie is unframed. Sollie is prosy. Lane is expansible. Lane is easterly. Lane is unframed. Lane is famished. Jethro is famished. Suzzy is easterly. Suzzy is undercover. Suzzy is prosy. All prosy things are undercover. If something is adactylous then it is expansible. All unframed, famished things are undercover. If something is unframed then it is expansible. All easterly, famished things are undercover. If something is unframed and easterly then it is famished. If something is expansible then it is easterly. Red, unframed things are undercover. Jethro is easterly.", "logic": "\nUnframed(sollie)\nProsy(sollie)\nExpansible(lane)\nEasterly(lane)\nUnframed(lane)\nFamished(lane)\nFamished(jethro)\nEasterly(suzzy)\nUndercover(suzzy)\nProsy(suzzy)\nforall x (Prosy(x) -> Undercover(x))\nforall x (Adactylous(x) -> Expansible(x))\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Famished(x) -> Undercover(x))\nforall x (Unframed(x) -> Expansible(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) and Famished(x) -> Undercover(x))\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Easterly(x) -> Famished(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Easterly(x))\nforall x (Famished(x) and Unframed(x) -> Undercover(x))\n\nEasterly(jethro)\n\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Easterly(x)) <- forall x (Adactylous(x) -> Expansible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Hercules is xxxiv. Hercules is uninjured. Dayle is designing. Dayle is stomachal. Dayle is xxxiv. Dayle is metabolic. Britni is metabolic. Mattie is stomachal. Mattie is numeric. Mattie is uninjured. All uninjured things are numeric. If something is cecal then it is designing. All xxxiv, metabolic things are numeric. If something is xxxiv then it is designing. All stomachal, metabolic things are numeric. If something is xxxiv and stomachal then it is metabolic. If something is designing then it is stomachal. Red, xxxiv things are numeric. Hercules is not cecal.", "logic": "\nXxxiv(hercules)\nUninjured(hercules)\nDesigning(dayle)\nStomachal(dayle)\nXxxiv(dayle)\nMetabolic(dayle)\nMetabolic(britni)\nStomachal(mattie)\nNumeric(mattie)\nUninjured(mattie)\nforall x (Uninjured(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Cecal(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Stomachal(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Stomachal(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Designing(x) -> Stomachal(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Xxxiv(x) -> Numeric(x))\n\nnot Cecal(hercules)\n\nnot Cecal(hercules) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Rhianna is drifting. Rhianna is subacid. Elliot is bankable. Elliot is awakened. Elliot is drifting. Elliot is diplomatic. Elsy is diplomatic. Faythe is awakened. Faythe is unproven. Faythe is subacid. All subacid things are unproven. If something is snide then it is bankable. All drifting, diplomatic things are unproven. If something is drifting then it is bankable. All awakened, diplomatic things are unproven. If something is drifting and awakened then it is diplomatic. If something is bankable then it is awakened. Red, drifting things are unproven. Faythe is drifting.", "logic": "\nDrifting(rhianna)\nSubacid(rhianna)\nBankable(elliot)\nAwakened(elliot)\nDrifting(elliot)\nDiplomatic(elliot)\nDiplomatic(elsy)\nAwakened(faythe)\nUnproven(faythe)\nSubacid(faythe)\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> Unproven(x))\nforall x (Snide(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) and Diplomatic(x) -> Unproven(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Awakened(x) and Diplomatic(x) -> Unproven(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) and Awakened(x) -> Diplomatic(x))\nforall x (Bankable(x) -> Awakened(x))\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) and Drifting(x) -> Unproven(x))\n\nDrifting(faythe)\n\nDrifting(faythe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Therese is uttermost. Therese is unselfish. Laurice is cleanable. Laurice is steely. Laurice is uttermost. Laurice is extensive. Lay is extensive. Jourdan is steely. Jourdan is carboxyl. Jourdan is unselfish. All unselfish things are carboxyl. If something is vitalizing then it is cleanable. All uttermost, extensive things are carboxyl. If something is uttermost then it is cleanable. All steely, extensive things are carboxyl. If something is uttermost and steely then it is extensive. If something is cleanable then it is steely. Red, uttermost things are carboxyl. Laurice is not unselfish.", "logic": "\nUttermost(therese)\nUnselfish(therese)\nCleanable(laurice)\nSteely(laurice)\nUttermost(laurice)\nExtensive(laurice)\nExtensive(lay)\nSteely(jourdan)\nCarboxyl(jourdan)\nUnselfish(jourdan)\nforall x (Unselfish(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) -> Cleanable(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) and Extensive(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Cleanable(x))\nforall x (Steely(x) and Extensive(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) and Steely(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Cleanable(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Uttermost(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\n\nnot Unselfish(laurice)\n\nnot Unselfish(laurice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Ellene is blemished. Ellene is standpat. Leonelle is familiar. Leonelle is slender. Leonelle is blemished. Leonelle is pituitary. Charlena is pituitary. Corabelle is slender. Corabelle is shot. Corabelle is standpat. All standpat things are shot. If something is aged then it is familiar. All blemished, pituitary things are shot. If something is blemished then it is familiar. All slender, pituitary things are shot. If something is blemished and slender then it is pituitary. If something is familiar then it is slender. Red, blemished things are shot. Leonelle is aged.", "logic": "\nBlemished(ellene)\nStandpat(ellene)\nFamiliar(leonelle)\nSlender(leonelle)\nBlemished(leonelle)\nPituitary(leonelle)\nPituitary(charlena)\nSlender(corabelle)\nShot(corabelle)\nStandpat(corabelle)\nforall x (Standpat(x) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (Aged(x) -> Familiar(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) and Pituitary(x) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) -> Familiar(x))\nforall x (Slender(x) and Pituitary(x) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) and Slender(x) -> Pituitary(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Slender(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Blemished(x) -> Shot(x))\n\nAged(leonelle)\n\nAged(leonelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Lonee is kosher. Lonee is federal. Lonee is narrow. Rock is kosher. Rock is sinful. Rock is federal. Rock is cxxxv. Rock is lifelong. Rock is seventh. Rock is narrow. Danette is kosher. Danette is sinful. Danette is federal. Danette is cxxxv. Danette is lifelong. Danette is narrow. If Lonee is narrow and Lonee is federal then Lonee is kosher. All kosher, narrow people are seventh. White people are cxxxv. If someone is kosher and sinful then they are federal. If Lonee is cxxxv and Lonee is kosher then Lonee is narrow. If someone is cxxxv then they are lifelong. If someone is sinful and seventh then they are cxxxv. If Danette is sinful then Danette is lifelong. Rock is seventh.", "logic": "\nKosher(lonee)\nFederal(lonee)\nNarrow(lonee)\nKosher(rock)\nSinful(rock)\nFederal(rock)\nCxxxv(rock)\nLifelong(rock)\nSeventh(rock)\nNarrow(rock)\nKosher(danette)\nSinful(danette)\nFederal(danette)\nCxxxv(danette)\nLifelong(danette)\nNarrow(danette)\nNarrow(lonee) and Federal(lonee) -> Kosher(lonee)\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Narrow(x) -> Seventh(x))\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> Cxxxv(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Sinful(x) -> Federal(x))\nCxxxv(lonee) and Kosher(lonee) -> Narrow(lonee)\nforall x (Cxxxv(x) -> Lifelong(x))\nforall x (Sinful(x) and Seventh(x) -> Cxxxv(x))\nSinful(danette) -> Lifelong(danette)\n\nSeventh(rock)\n\ntherefore Seventh(rock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Cordelia is flaxen. Cordelia is popeyed. Cordelia is highborn. Lorette is flaxen. Lorette is factorial. Lorette is popeyed. Lorette is insatiable. Lorette is halfway. Lorette is cisalpine. Lorette is highborn. Amanda is flaxen. Amanda is factorial. Amanda is popeyed. Amanda is insatiable. Amanda is halfway. Amanda is highborn. If Cordelia is highborn and Cordelia is popeyed then Cordelia is flaxen. All flaxen, highborn people are cisalpine. White people are insatiable. If someone is flaxen and factorial then they are popeyed. If Cordelia is insatiable and Cordelia is flaxen then Cordelia is highborn. If someone is insatiable then they are halfway. If someone is factorial and cisalpine then they are insatiable. If Amanda is factorial then Amanda is halfway. Amanda is not halfway.", "logic": "\nFlaxen(cordelia)\nPopeyed(cordelia)\nHighborn(cordelia)\nFlaxen(lorette)\nFactorial(lorette)\nPopeyed(lorette)\nInsatiable(lorette)\nHalfway(lorette)\nCisalpine(lorette)\nHighborn(lorette)\nFlaxen(amanda)\nFactorial(amanda)\nPopeyed(amanda)\nInsatiable(amanda)\nHalfway(amanda)\nHighborn(amanda)\nHighborn(cordelia) and Popeyed(cordelia) -> Flaxen(cordelia)\nforall x (Flaxen(x) and Highborn(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Cisalpine(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) and Factorial(x) -> Popeyed(x))\nInsatiable(cordelia) and Flaxen(cordelia) -> Highborn(cordelia)\nforall x (Insatiable(x) -> Halfway(x))\nforall x (Factorial(x) and Cisalpine(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nFactorial(amanda) -> Halfway(amanda)\n\nnot Halfway(amanda)\n\ntherefore Halfway(amanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Theobald is yeatsian. Theobald is weedy. Theobald is maniclike. Dorthea is yeatsian. Dorthea is mesmeric. Dorthea is weedy. Dorthea is laudatory. Dorthea is unified. Dorthea is continued. Dorthea is maniclike. Dori is yeatsian. Dori is mesmeric. Dori is weedy. Dori is laudatory. Dori is unified. Dori is maniclike. If Theobald is maniclike and Theobald is weedy then Theobald is yeatsian. All yeatsian, maniclike people are continued. White people are laudatory. If someone is yeatsian and mesmeric then they are weedy. If Theobald is laudatory and Theobald is yeatsian then Theobald is maniclike. If someone is laudatory then they are unified. If someone is mesmeric and continued then they are laudatory. If Dori is mesmeric then Dori is unified. Theobald is continued.", "logic": "\nYeatsian(theobald)\nWeedy(theobald)\nManiclike(theobald)\nYeatsian(dorthea)\nMesmeric(dorthea)\nWeedy(dorthea)\nLaudatory(dorthea)\nUnified(dorthea)\nContinued(dorthea)\nManiclike(dorthea)\nYeatsian(dori)\nMesmeric(dori)\nWeedy(dori)\nLaudatory(dori)\nUnified(dori)\nManiclike(dori)\nManiclike(theobald) and Weedy(theobald) -> Yeatsian(theobald)\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and Maniclike(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Continued(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Weedy(x))\nLaudatory(theobald) and Yeatsian(theobald) -> Maniclike(theobald)\nforall x (Laudatory(x) -> Unified(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) and Continued(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nMesmeric(dori) -> Unified(dori)\n\nContinued(theobald)\n\nYeatsian(theobald) and Maniclike(theobald) and forall x (Yeatsian(x) and Maniclike(x) -> Continued(x)) -> therefore Continued(theobald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Norman is greasy. Norman is unfenced. Norman is suborbital. Tammy is greasy. Tammy is visualized. Tammy is unfenced. Tammy is carven. Tammy is sublimate. Tammy is bounderish. Tammy is suborbital. Amelina is greasy. Amelina is visualized. Amelina is unfenced. Amelina is carven. Amelina is sublimate. Amelina is suborbital. If Norman is suborbital and Norman is unfenced then Norman is greasy. All greasy, suborbital people are bounderish. White people are carven. If someone is greasy and visualized then they are unfenced. If Norman is carven and Norman is greasy then Norman is suborbital. If someone is carven then they are sublimate. If someone is visualized and bounderish then they are carven. If Amelina is visualized then Amelina is sublimate. Norman is not bounderish.", "logic": "\nGreasy(norman)\nUnfenced(norman)\nSuborbital(norman)\nGreasy(tammy)\nVisualized(tammy)\nUnfenced(tammy)\nCarven(tammy)\nSublimate(tammy)\nBounderish(tammy)\nSuborbital(tammy)\nGreasy(amelina)\nVisualized(amelina)\nUnfenced(amelina)\nCarven(amelina)\nSublimate(amelina)\nSuborbital(amelina)\nSuborbital(norman) and Unfenced(norman) -> Greasy(norman)\nforall x (Greasy(x) and Suborbital(x) -> Bounderish(x))\nforall x (Bounderish(x) -> Carven(x))\nforall x (Greasy(x) and Visualized(x) -> Unfenced(x))\nCarven(norman) and Greasy(norman) -> Suborbital(norman)\nforall x (Carven(x) -> Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Visualized(x) and Bounderish(x) -> Carven(x))\nVisualized(amelina) -> Sublimate(amelina)\n\nnot Bounderish(norman)\n\nGreasy(norman) and Suborbital(norman) and forall x (Greasy(x) and Suborbital(x) -> Bounderish(x)) -> therefore Bounderish(norman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Gunilla is agape. Gunilla is cathodic. Gunilla is agone. Andie is agape. Andie is unequaled. Andie is cathodic. Andie is priestlike. Andie is ungallant. Andie is monarchal. Andie is agone. Annabel is agape. Annabel is unequaled. Annabel is cathodic. Annabel is priestlike. Annabel is ungallant. Annabel is agone. If Gunilla is agone and Gunilla is cathodic then Gunilla is agape. All agape, agone people are monarchal. White people are priestlike. If someone is agape and unequaled then they are cathodic. If Gunilla is priestlike and Gunilla is agape then Gunilla is agone. If someone is priestlike then they are ungallant. If someone is unequaled and monarchal then they are priestlike. If Annabel is unequaled then Annabel is ungallant. Gunilla is priestlike.", "logic": "\nAgape(gunilla)\nCathodic(gunilla)\nAgone(gunilla)\nAgape(andie)\nUnequaled(andie)\nCathodic(andie)\nPriestlike(andie)\nUngallant(andie)\nMonarchal(andie)\nAgone(andie)\nAgape(annabel)\nUnequaled(annabel)\nCathodic(annabel)\nPriestlike(annabel)\nUngallant(annabel)\nAgone(annabel)\nAgone(gunilla) and Cathodic(gunilla) -> Agape(gunilla)\nforall x (Agape(x) and Agone(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) -> Priestlike(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) and Unequaled(x) -> Cathodic(x))\nPriestlike(gunilla) and Agape(gunilla) -> Agone(gunilla)\nforall x (Priestlike(x) -> Ungallant(x))\nforall x (Unequaled(x) and Monarchal(x) -> Priestlike(x))\nUnequaled(annabel) -> Ungallant(annabel)\n\nPriestlike(gunilla)\n\nAgape(gunilla) and Agone(gunilla) and forall x (Agape(x) and Agone(x) -> Monarchal(x)) -> therefore Monarchal(gunilla) Monarchal(gunilla) and forall x (Monarchal(x) -> Priestlike(x)) -> therefore Priestlike(gunilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Neddie is asunder. Neddie is helpful. Neddie is mourning. Collin is asunder. Collin is liberal. Collin is helpful. Collin is assistive. Collin is funky. Collin is sanitized. Collin is mourning. Kikelia is asunder. Kikelia is liberal. Kikelia is helpful. Kikelia is assistive. Kikelia is funky. Kikelia is mourning. If Neddie is mourning and Neddie is helpful then Neddie is asunder. All asunder, mourning people are sanitized. White people are assistive. If someone is asunder and liberal then they are helpful. If Neddie is assistive and Neddie is asunder then Neddie is mourning. If someone is assistive then they are funky. If someone is liberal and sanitized then they are assistive. If Kikelia is liberal then Kikelia is funky. Neddie is not assistive.", "logic": "\nAsunder(neddie)\nHelpful(neddie)\nMourning(neddie)\nAsunder(collin)\nLiberal(collin)\nHelpful(collin)\nAssistive(collin)\nFunky(collin)\nSanitized(collin)\nMourning(collin)\nAsunder(kikelia)\nLiberal(kikelia)\nHelpful(kikelia)\nAssistive(kikelia)\nFunky(kikelia)\nMourning(kikelia)\nMourning(neddie) and Helpful(neddie) -> Asunder(neddie)\nforall x (Asunder(x) and Mourning(x) -> Sanitized(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) -> Assistive(x))\nforall x (Asunder(x) and Liberal(x) -> Helpful(x))\nAssistive(neddie) and Asunder(neddie) -> Mourning(neddie)\nforall x (Assistive(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Liberal(x) and Sanitized(x) -> Assistive(x))\nLiberal(kikelia) -> Funky(kikelia)\n\nnot Assistive(neddie)\n\nAsunder(neddie) and Mourning(neddie) and forall x (Asunder(x) and Mourning(x) -> Sanitized(x)) -> therefore Sanitized(neddie) Sanitized(neddie) and forall x (Sanitized(x) -> Assistive(x)) -> therefore Assistive(neddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Morgan is dissolved. Morgan is uruguayan. Morgan is operatic. Otis is dissolved. Otis is syllabic. Otis is uruguayan. Otis is unreactive. Otis is randy. Otis is worthless. Otis is operatic. Arabelle is dissolved. Arabelle is syllabic. Arabelle is uruguayan. Arabelle is unreactive. Arabelle is randy. Arabelle is operatic. If Morgan is operatic and Morgan is uruguayan then Morgan is dissolved. All dissolved, operatic people are worthless. White people are unreactive. If someone is dissolved and syllabic then they are uruguayan. If Morgan is unreactive and Morgan is dissolved then Morgan is operatic. If someone is unreactive then they are randy. If someone is syllabic and worthless then they are unreactive. If Arabelle is syllabic then Arabelle is randy. Morgan is randy.", "logic": "\nDissolved(morgan)\nUruguayan(morgan)\nOperatic(morgan)\nDissolved(otis)\nSyllabic(otis)\nUruguayan(otis)\nUnreactive(otis)\nRandy(otis)\nWorthless(otis)\nOperatic(otis)\nDissolved(arabelle)\nSyllabic(arabelle)\nUruguayan(arabelle)\nUnreactive(arabelle)\nRandy(arabelle)\nOperatic(arabelle)\nOperatic(morgan) and Uruguayan(morgan) -> Dissolved(morgan)\nforall x (Dissolved(x) and Operatic(x) -> Worthless(x))\nforall x (Worthless(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Dissolved(x) and Syllabic(x) -> Uruguayan(x))\nUnreactive(morgan) and Dissolved(morgan) -> Operatic(morgan)\nforall x (Unreactive(x) -> Randy(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) and Worthless(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nSyllabic(arabelle) -> Randy(arabelle)\n\nRandy(morgan)\n\nDissolved(morgan) and Operatic(morgan) and forall x (Dissolved(x) and Operatic(x) -> Worthless(x)) -> therefore Worthless(morgan) Worthless(morgan) and forall x (Worthless(x) -> Unreactive(x)) -> therefore Unreactive(morgan) Unreactive(morgan) and forall x (Unreactive(x) -> Randy(x)) -> therefore Randy(morgan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Calypso is whacked. Calypso is copulatory. Calypso is redeemable. Hillard is whacked. Hillard is automatic. Hillard is copulatory. Hillard is stabile. Hillard is sequent. Hillard is agonising. Hillard is redeemable. Ingemar is whacked. Ingemar is automatic. Ingemar is copulatory. Ingemar is stabile. Ingemar is sequent. Ingemar is redeemable. If Calypso is redeemable and Calypso is copulatory then Calypso is whacked. All whacked, redeemable people are agonising. White people are stabile. If someone is whacked and automatic then they are copulatory. If Calypso is stabile and Calypso is whacked then Calypso is redeemable. If someone is stabile then they are sequent. If someone is automatic and agonising then they are stabile. If Ingemar is automatic then Ingemar is sequent. Calypso is not sequent.", "logic": "\nWhacked(calypso)\nCopulatory(calypso)\nRedeemable(calypso)\nWhacked(hillard)\nAutomatic(hillard)\nCopulatory(hillard)\nStabile(hillard)\nSequent(hillard)\nAgonising(hillard)\nRedeemable(hillard)\nWhacked(ingemar)\nAutomatic(ingemar)\nCopulatory(ingemar)\nStabile(ingemar)\nSequent(ingemar)\nRedeemable(ingemar)\nRedeemable(calypso) and Copulatory(calypso) -> Whacked(calypso)\nforall x (Whacked(x) and Redeemable(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Stabile(x))\nforall x (Whacked(x) and Automatic(x) -> Copulatory(x))\nStabile(calypso) and Whacked(calypso) -> Redeemable(calypso)\nforall x (Stabile(x) -> Sequent(x))\nforall x (Automatic(x) and Agonising(x) -> Stabile(x))\nAutomatic(ingemar) -> Sequent(ingemar)\n\nnot Sequent(calypso)\n\nWhacked(calypso) and Redeemable(calypso) and forall x (Whacked(x) and Redeemable(x) -> Agonising(x)) -> therefore Agonising(calypso) Agonising(calypso) and forall x (Agonising(x) -> Stabile(x)) -> therefore Stabile(calypso) Stabile(calypso) and forall x (Stabile(x) -> Sequent(x)) -> therefore Sequent(calypso)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The irita is calm. The irita ozonize the haleigh. The irita poetise the hope. The irita poetise the haleigh. The hope inebriate the haleigh. The hope is not palsied. The hope is fringy. The hope ozonize the irita. The hope ozonize the haleigh. The hope poetise the haleigh. The haleigh inebriate the hope. The haleigh poetise the hope. If something poetise the irita then the irita ozonize the hope. If something inebriate the haleigh then it is teal. If something ozonize the irita then the irita is palsied. If something inebriate the haleigh then the haleigh is not fringy. If something ozonize the hope then the hope does not need the irita. If something is calm and it does not need the hope then the hope does not like the irita. If the haleigh is palsied and the haleigh ozonize the hope then the haleigh does not eat the irita. If something poetise the hope and the hope inebriate the haleigh then it poetise the irita. The irita poetise the haleigh.", "logic": "\nCalm(irita)\nOzonize(irita, haleigh)\nPoetise(irita, hope)\nPoetise(irita, haleigh)\nInebriate(hope, haleigh)\nnot Palsied(hope)\nFringy(hope)\nOzonize(hope, irita)\nOzonize(hope, haleigh)\nPoetise(hope, haleigh)\nInebriate(haleigh, hope)\nPoetise(haleigh, hope)\nforall x (Poetise(x, irita) -> Ozonize(irita, hope))\nforall x (Inebriate(x, haleigh) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Ozonize(x, irita) -> Palsied(irita))\nforall x (Inebriate(x, haleigh) -> not Fringy(haleigh))\nforall x (Ozonize(x, hope) -> not Poetise(hope, irita))\nforall x (Calm(x) and not Poetise(x, hope) -> not Ozonize(hope, irita))\nPalsied(haleigh) and Ozonize(haleigh, hope) -> not Inebriate(haleigh, irita)\nforall x (Poetise(x, hope) and Inebriate(hope, haleigh) -> Poetise(x, irita))\n\nPoetise(irita, haleigh)\n\ntherefore Poetise(irita, haleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The radcliffe is umbellate. The radcliffe root the alane. The radcliffe drift the sloane. The radcliffe drift the alane. The sloane bore the alane. The sloane is not mincing. The sloane is aplitic. The sloane root the radcliffe. The sloane root the alane. The sloane drift the alane. The alane bore the sloane. The alane drift the sloane. If something drift the radcliffe then the radcliffe root the sloane. If something bore the alane then it is ariose. If something root the radcliffe then the radcliffe is mincing. If something bore the alane then the alane is not aplitic. If something root the sloane then the sloane does not need the radcliffe. If something is umbellate and it does not need the sloane then the sloane does not like the radcliffe. If the alane is mincing and the alane root the sloane then the alane does not eat the radcliffe. If something drift the sloane and the sloane bore the alane then it drift the radcliffe. The sloane does not like the alane.", "logic": "\nUmbellate(radcliffe)\nRoot(radcliffe, alane)\nDrift(radcliffe, sloane)\nDrift(radcliffe, alane)\nBore(sloane, alane)\nnot Mincing(sloane)\nAplitic(sloane)\nRoot(sloane, radcliffe)\nRoot(sloane, alane)\nDrift(sloane, alane)\nBore(alane, sloane)\nDrift(alane, sloane)\nforall x (Drift(x, radcliffe) -> Root(radcliffe, sloane))\nforall x (Bore(x, alane) -> Ariose(x))\nforall x (Root(x, radcliffe) -> Mincing(radcliffe))\nforall x (Bore(x, alane) -> not Aplitic(alane))\nforall x (Root(x, sloane) -> not Drift(sloane, radcliffe))\nforall x (Umbellate(x) and not Drift(x, sloane) -> not Root(sloane, radcliffe))\nMincing(alane) and Root(alane, sloane) -> not Bore(alane, radcliffe)\nforall x (Drift(x, sloane) and Bore(sloane, alane) -> Drift(x, radcliffe))\n\nnot Root(sloane, alane)\n\ntherefore Root(sloane, alane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The maryellen is medullated. The maryellen connect the othella. The maryellen await the garret. The maryellen await the othella. The garret disembroil the othella. The garret is not cotyloidal. The garret is skinless. The garret connect the maryellen. The garret connect the othella. The garret await the othella. The othella disembroil the garret. The othella await the garret. If something await the maryellen then the maryellen connect the garret. If something disembroil the othella then it is becoming. If something connect the maryellen then the maryellen is cotyloidal. If something disembroil the othella then the othella is not skinless. If something connect the garret then the garret does not need the maryellen. If something is medullated and it does not need the garret then the garret does not like the maryellen. If the othella is cotyloidal and the othella connect the garret then the othella does not eat the maryellen. If something await the garret and the garret disembroil the othella then it await the maryellen. The maryellen await the maryellen.", "logic": "\nMedullated(maryellen)\nConnect(maryellen, othella)\nAwait(maryellen, garret)\nAwait(maryellen, othella)\nDisembroil(garret, othella)\nnot Cotyloidal(garret)\nSkinless(garret)\nConnect(garret, maryellen)\nConnect(garret, othella)\nAwait(garret, othella)\nDisembroil(othella, garret)\nAwait(othella, garret)\nforall x (Await(x, maryellen) -> Connect(maryellen, garret))\nforall x (Disembroil(x, othella) -> Becoming(x))\nforall x (Connect(x, maryellen) -> Cotyloidal(maryellen))\nforall x (Disembroil(x, othella) -> not Skinless(othella))\nforall x (Connect(x, garret) -> not Await(garret, maryellen))\nforall x (Medullated(x) and not Await(x, garret) -> not Connect(garret, maryellen))\nCotyloidal(othella) and Connect(othella, garret) -> not Disembroil(othella, maryellen)\nforall x (Await(x, garret) and Disembroil(garret, othella) -> Await(x, maryellen))\n\nAwait(maryellen, maryellen)\n\nAwait(maryellen, garret) and Disembroil(garret, othella) and forall x (Await(x, garret) and Disembroil(garret, othella) -> Await(x, maryellen)) -> therefore Await(maryellen, maryellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The orazio is screwball. The orazio deterge the lancelot. The orazio yearn the tabitha. The orazio yearn the lancelot. The tabitha flute the lancelot. The tabitha is not canadian. The tabitha is dumfounded. The tabitha deterge the orazio. The tabitha deterge the lancelot. The tabitha yearn the lancelot. The lancelot flute the tabitha. The lancelot yearn the tabitha. If something yearn the orazio then the orazio deterge the tabitha. If something flute the lancelot then it is stinting. If something deterge the orazio then the orazio is canadian. If something flute the lancelot then the lancelot is not dumfounded. If something deterge the tabitha then the tabitha does not need the orazio. If something is screwball and it does not need the tabitha then the tabitha does not like the orazio. If the lancelot is canadian and the lancelot deterge the tabitha then the lancelot does not eat the orazio. If something yearn the tabitha and the tabitha flute the lancelot then it yearn the orazio. The orazio does not need the orazio.", "logic": "\nScrewball(orazio)\nDeterge(orazio, lancelot)\nYearn(orazio, tabitha)\nYearn(orazio, lancelot)\nFlute(tabitha, lancelot)\nnot Canadian(tabitha)\nDumfounded(tabitha)\nDeterge(tabitha, orazio)\nDeterge(tabitha, lancelot)\nYearn(tabitha, lancelot)\nFlute(lancelot, tabitha)\nYearn(lancelot, tabitha)\nforall x (Yearn(x, orazio) -> Deterge(orazio, tabitha))\nforall x (Flute(x, lancelot) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Deterge(x, orazio) -> Canadian(orazio))\nforall x (Flute(x, lancelot) -> not Dumfounded(lancelot))\nforall x (Deterge(x, tabitha) -> not Yearn(tabitha, orazio))\nforall x (Screwball(x) and not Yearn(x, tabitha) -> not Deterge(tabitha, orazio))\nCanadian(lancelot) and Deterge(lancelot, tabitha) -> not Flute(lancelot, orazio)\nforall x (Yearn(x, tabitha) and Flute(tabitha, lancelot) -> Yearn(x, orazio))\n\nnot Yearn(orazio, orazio)\n\nYearn(orazio, tabitha) and Flute(tabitha, lancelot) and forall x (Yearn(x, tabitha) and Flute(tabitha, lancelot) -> Yearn(x, orazio)) -> therefore Yearn(orazio, orazio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The salem is garish. The salem abduce the kissee. The salem patronage the layla. The salem patronage the kissee. The layla emblazon the kissee. The layla is not anguished. The layla is fusiform. The layla abduce the salem. The layla abduce the kissee. The layla patronage the kissee. The kissee emblazon the layla. The kissee patronage the layla. If something patronage the salem then the salem abduce the layla. If something emblazon the kissee then it is exaugural. If something abduce the salem then the salem is anguished. If something emblazon the kissee then the kissee is not fusiform. If something abduce the layla then the layla does not need the salem. If something is garish and it does not need the layla then the layla does not like the salem. If the kissee is anguished and the kissee abduce the layla then the kissee does not eat the salem. If something patronage the layla and the layla emblazon the kissee then it patronage the salem. The salem abduce the layla.", "logic": "\nGarish(salem)\nAbduce(salem, kissee)\nPatronage(salem, layla)\nPatronage(salem, kissee)\nEmblazon(layla, kissee)\nnot Anguished(layla)\nFusiform(layla)\nAbduce(layla, salem)\nAbduce(layla, kissee)\nPatronage(layla, kissee)\nEmblazon(kissee, layla)\nPatronage(kissee, layla)\nforall x (Patronage(x, salem) -> Abduce(salem, layla))\nforall x (Emblazon(x, kissee) -> Exaugural(x))\nforall x (Abduce(x, salem) -> Anguished(salem))\nforall x (Emblazon(x, kissee) -> not Fusiform(kissee))\nforall x (Abduce(x, layla) -> not Patronage(layla, salem))\nforall x (Garish(x) and not Patronage(x, layla) -> not Abduce(layla, salem))\nAnguished(kissee) and Abduce(kissee, layla) -> not Emblazon(kissee, salem)\nforall x (Patronage(x, layla) and Emblazon(layla, kissee) -> Patronage(x, salem))\n\nAbduce(salem, layla)\n\nPatronage(kissee, layla) and Emblazon(layla, kissee) and forall x (Patronage(x, layla) and Emblazon(layla, kissee) -> Patronage(x, salem)) -> therefore Patronage(kissee, salem) Patronage(kissee, salem) and forall x (Patronage(x, salem) -> Abduce(salem, layla)) -> therefore Abduce(salem, layla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The reeva is smothered. The reeva prime the kara. The reeva kern the jonathon. The reeva kern the kara. The jonathon reinsure the kara. The jonathon is not limitless. The jonathon is bicorned. The jonathon prime the reeva. The jonathon prime the kara. The jonathon kern the kara. The kara reinsure the jonathon. The kara kern the jonathon. If something kern the reeva then the reeva prime the jonathon. If something reinsure the kara then it is woebegone. If something prime the reeva then the reeva is limitless. If something reinsure the kara then the kara is not bicorned. If something prime the jonathon then the jonathon does not need the reeva. If something is smothered and it does not need the jonathon then the jonathon does not like the reeva. If the kara is limitless and the kara prime the jonathon then the kara does not eat the reeva. If something kern the jonathon and the jonathon reinsure the kara then it kern the reeva. The reeva does not like the jonathon.", "logic": "\nSmothered(reeva)\nPrime(reeva, kara)\nKern(reeva, jonathon)\nKern(reeva, kara)\nReinsure(jonathon, kara)\nnot Limitless(jonathon)\nBicorned(jonathon)\nPrime(jonathon, reeva)\nPrime(jonathon, kara)\nKern(jonathon, kara)\nReinsure(kara, jonathon)\nKern(kara, jonathon)\nforall x (Kern(x, reeva) -> Prime(reeva, jonathon))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, kara) -> Woebegone(x))\nforall x (Prime(x, reeva) -> Limitless(reeva))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, kara) -> not Bicorned(kara))\nforall x (Prime(x, jonathon) -> not Kern(jonathon, reeva))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and not Kern(x, jonathon) -> not Prime(jonathon, reeva))\nLimitless(kara) and Prime(kara, jonathon) -> not Reinsure(kara, reeva)\nforall x (Kern(x, jonathon) and Reinsure(jonathon, kara) -> Kern(x, reeva))\n\nnot Prime(reeva, jonathon)\n\nKern(kara, jonathon) and Reinsure(jonathon, kara) and forall x (Kern(x, jonathon) and Reinsure(jonathon, kara) -> Kern(x, reeva)) -> therefore Kern(kara, reeva) Kern(kara, reeva) and forall x (Kern(x, reeva) -> Prime(reeva, jonathon)) -> therefore Prime(reeva, jonathon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The hassan is treeless. The hassan sequester the violet. The hassan chafe the finley. The hassan chafe the violet. The finley post the violet. The finley is not alvine. The finley is desegrated. The finley sequester the hassan. The finley sequester the violet. The finley chafe the violet. The violet post the finley. The violet chafe the finley. If something chafe the hassan then the hassan sequester the finley. If something post the violet then it is carousing. If something sequester the hassan then the hassan is alvine. If something post the violet then the violet is not desegrated. If something sequester the finley then the finley does not need the hassan. If something is treeless and it does not need the finley then the finley does not like the hassan. If the violet is alvine and the violet sequester the finley then the violet does not eat the hassan. If something chafe the finley and the finley post the violet then it chafe the hassan. The finley does not need the hassan.", "logic": "\nTreeless(hassan)\nSequester(hassan, violet)\nChafe(hassan, finley)\nChafe(hassan, violet)\nPost(finley, violet)\nnot Alvine(finley)\nDesegrated(finley)\nSequester(finley, hassan)\nSequester(finley, violet)\nChafe(finley, violet)\nPost(violet, finley)\nChafe(violet, finley)\nforall x (Chafe(x, hassan) -> Sequester(hassan, finley))\nforall x (Post(x, violet) -> Carousing(x))\nforall x (Sequester(x, hassan) -> Alvine(hassan))\nforall x (Post(x, violet) -> not Desegrated(violet))\nforall x (Sequester(x, finley) -> not Chafe(finley, hassan))\nforall x (Treeless(x) and not Chafe(x, finley) -> not Sequester(finley, hassan))\nAlvine(violet) and Sequester(violet, finley) -> not Post(violet, hassan)\nforall x (Chafe(x, finley) and Post(finley, violet) -> Chafe(x, hassan))\n\nnot Chafe(finley, hassan)\n\nChafe(violet, finley) and Post(finley, violet) and forall x (Chafe(x, finley) and Post(finley, violet) -> Chafe(x, hassan)) -> therefore Chafe(violet, hassan) Chafe(violet, hassan) and forall x (Chafe(x, hassan) -> Sequester(hassan, finley)) -> therefore Sequester(hassan, finley) Sequester(hassan, finley) and forall x (Sequester(x, finley) -> not Chafe(finley, hassan)) -> therefore not Chafe(finley, hassan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The christan is porose. The christan repudiate the colene. The christan spiritize the ginger. The christan spiritize the colene. The ginger sermonise the colene. The ginger is not over. The ginger is affixial. The ginger repudiate the christan. The ginger repudiate the colene. The ginger spiritize the colene. The colene sermonise the ginger. The colene spiritize the ginger. If something spiritize the christan then the christan repudiate the ginger. If something sermonise the colene then it is clumsy. If something repudiate the christan then the christan is over. If something sermonise the colene then the colene is not affixial. If something repudiate the ginger then the ginger does not need the christan. If something is porose and it does not need the ginger then the ginger does not like the christan. If the colene is over and the colene repudiate the ginger then the colene does not eat the christan. If something spiritize the ginger and the ginger sermonise the colene then it spiritize the christan. The ginger spiritize the christan.", "logic": "\nPorose(christan)\nRepudiate(christan, colene)\nSpiritize(christan, ginger)\nSpiritize(christan, colene)\nSermonise(ginger, colene)\nnot Over(ginger)\nAffixial(ginger)\nRepudiate(ginger, christan)\nRepudiate(ginger, colene)\nSpiritize(ginger, colene)\nSermonise(colene, ginger)\nSpiritize(colene, ginger)\nforall x (Spiritize(x, christan) -> Repudiate(christan, ginger))\nforall x (Sermonise(x, colene) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, christan) -> Over(christan))\nforall x (Sermonise(x, colene) -> not Affixial(colene))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, ginger) -> not Spiritize(ginger, christan))\nforall x (Porose(x) and not Spiritize(x, ginger) -> not Repudiate(ginger, christan))\nOver(colene) and Repudiate(colene, ginger) -> not Sermonise(colene, christan)\nforall x (Spiritize(x, ginger) and Sermonise(ginger, colene) -> Spiritize(x, christan))\n\nSpiritize(ginger, christan)\n\nSpiritize(colene, ginger) and Sermonise(ginger, colene) and forall x (Spiritize(x, ginger) and Sermonise(ginger, colene) -> Spiritize(x, christan)) -> therefore Spiritize(colene, christan) Spiritize(colene, christan) and forall x (Spiritize(x, christan) -> Repudiate(christan, ginger)) -> therefore Repudiate(christan, ginger) Repudiate(christan, ginger) and forall x (Repudiate(x, ginger) -> not Spiritize(ginger, christan)) -> therefore not Spiritize(ginger, christan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The martainn is tricksy. The martainn besmirch the mandy. The martainn urbanize the emmalee. The martainn urbanize the mandy. The emmalee unchain the mandy. The emmalee is not befitting. The emmalee is neuralgic. The emmalee besmirch the martainn. The emmalee besmirch the mandy. The emmalee urbanize the mandy. The mandy unchain the emmalee. The mandy urbanize the emmalee. If something urbanize the martainn then the martainn besmirch the emmalee. If something unchain the mandy then it is flakey. If something besmirch the martainn then the martainn is befitting. If something unchain the mandy then the mandy is not neuralgic. If something besmirch the emmalee then the emmalee does not need the martainn. If something is tricksy and it does not need the emmalee then the emmalee does not like the martainn. If the mandy is befitting and the mandy besmirch the emmalee then the mandy does not eat the martainn. If something urbanize the emmalee and the emmalee unchain the mandy then it urbanize the martainn. The martainn is not flakey.", "logic": "\nTricksy(martainn)\nBesmirch(martainn, mandy)\nUrbanize(martainn, emmalee)\nUrbanize(martainn, mandy)\nUnchain(emmalee, mandy)\nnot Befitting(emmalee)\nNeuralgic(emmalee)\nBesmirch(emmalee, martainn)\nBesmirch(emmalee, mandy)\nUrbanize(emmalee, mandy)\nUnchain(mandy, emmalee)\nUrbanize(mandy, emmalee)\nforall x (Urbanize(x, martainn) -> Besmirch(martainn, emmalee))\nforall x (Unchain(x, mandy) -> Flakey(x))\nforall x (Besmirch(x, martainn) -> Befitting(martainn))\nforall x (Unchain(x, mandy) -> not Neuralgic(mandy))\nforall x (Besmirch(x, emmalee) -> not Urbanize(emmalee, martainn))\nforall x (Tricksy(x) and not Urbanize(x, emmalee) -> not Besmirch(emmalee, martainn))\nBefitting(mandy) and Besmirch(mandy, emmalee) -> not Unchain(mandy, martainn)\nforall x (Urbanize(x, emmalee) and Unchain(emmalee, mandy) -> Urbanize(x, martainn))\n\nnot Flakey(martainn)\n\nforall x (Unchain(x, mandy) -> Flakey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The barri is unwed. The barri shutter the jeremy. The barri miaow the rubie. The barri miaow the jeremy. The rubie blether the jeremy. The rubie is not clattery. The rubie is sinful. The rubie shutter the barri. The rubie shutter the jeremy. The rubie miaow the jeremy. The jeremy blether the rubie. The jeremy miaow the rubie. If something miaow the barri then the barri shutter the rubie. If something blether the jeremy then it is explicit. If something shutter the barri then the barri is clattery. If something blether the jeremy then the jeremy is not sinful. If something shutter the rubie then the rubie does not need the barri. If something is unwed and it does not need the rubie then the rubie does not like the barri. If the jeremy is clattery and the jeremy shutter the rubie then the jeremy does not eat the barri. If something miaow the rubie and the rubie blether the jeremy then it miaow the barri. The jeremy is explicit.", "logic": "\nUnwed(barri)\nShutter(barri, jeremy)\nMiaow(barri, rubie)\nMiaow(barri, jeremy)\nBlether(rubie, jeremy)\nnot Clattery(rubie)\nSinful(rubie)\nShutter(rubie, barri)\nShutter(rubie, jeremy)\nMiaow(rubie, jeremy)\nBlether(jeremy, rubie)\nMiaow(jeremy, rubie)\nforall x (Miaow(x, barri) -> Shutter(barri, rubie))\nforall x (Blether(x, jeremy) -> Explicit(x))\nforall x (Shutter(x, barri) -> Clattery(barri))\nforall x (Blether(x, jeremy) -> not Sinful(jeremy))\nforall x (Shutter(x, rubie) -> not Miaow(rubie, barri))\nforall x (Unwed(x) and not Miaow(x, rubie) -> not Shutter(rubie, barri))\nClattery(jeremy) and Shutter(jeremy, rubie) -> not Blether(jeremy, barri)\nforall x (Miaow(x, rubie) and Blether(rubie, jeremy) -> Miaow(x, barri))\n\nExplicit(jeremy)\n\nforall x (Blether(x, jeremy) -> Explicit(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The lesli is huffish. The lesli index the isaak. The lesli annunciate the marjorie. The lesli annunciate the isaak. The marjorie tinkle the isaak. The marjorie is not subarctic. The marjorie is mislaid. The marjorie index the lesli. The marjorie index the isaak. The marjorie annunciate the isaak. The isaak tinkle the marjorie. The isaak annunciate the marjorie. If something annunciate the lesli then the lesli index the marjorie. If something tinkle the isaak then it is liberal. If something index the lesli then the lesli is subarctic. If something tinkle the isaak then the isaak is not mislaid. If something index the marjorie then the marjorie does not need the lesli. If something is huffish and it does not need the marjorie then the marjorie does not like the lesli. If the isaak is subarctic and the isaak index the marjorie then the isaak does not eat the lesli. If something annunciate the marjorie and the marjorie tinkle the isaak then it annunciate the lesli. The lesli does not like the lesli.", "logic": "\nHuffish(lesli)\nIndex(lesli, isaak)\nAnnunciate(lesli, marjorie)\nAnnunciate(lesli, isaak)\nTinkle(marjorie, isaak)\nnot Subarctic(marjorie)\nMislaid(marjorie)\nIndex(marjorie, lesli)\nIndex(marjorie, isaak)\nAnnunciate(marjorie, isaak)\nTinkle(isaak, marjorie)\nAnnunciate(isaak, marjorie)\nforall x (Annunciate(x, lesli) -> Index(lesli, marjorie))\nforall x (Tinkle(x, isaak) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Index(x, lesli) -> Subarctic(lesli))\nforall x (Tinkle(x, isaak) -> not Mislaid(isaak))\nforall x (Index(x, marjorie) -> not Annunciate(marjorie, lesli))\nforall x (Huffish(x) and not Annunciate(x, marjorie) -> not Index(marjorie, lesli))\nSubarctic(isaak) and Index(isaak, marjorie) -> not Tinkle(isaak, lesli)\nforall x (Annunciate(x, marjorie) and Tinkle(marjorie, isaak) -> Annunciate(x, lesli))\n\nnot Index(lesli, lesli)\n\nnot Index(lesli, lesli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The paulita is formulated. The paulita powderise the yoshiko. The paulita quiz the cathy. The paulita quiz the yoshiko. The cathy incise the yoshiko. The cathy is not privileged. The cathy is slothful. The cathy powderise the paulita. The cathy powderise the yoshiko. The cathy quiz the yoshiko. The yoshiko incise the cathy. The yoshiko quiz the cathy. If something quiz the paulita then the paulita powderise the cathy. If something incise the yoshiko then it is defunct. If something powderise the paulita then the paulita is privileged. If something incise the yoshiko then the yoshiko is not slothful. If something powderise the cathy then the cathy does not need the paulita. If something is formulated and it does not need the cathy then the cathy does not like the paulita. If the yoshiko is privileged and the yoshiko powderise the cathy then the yoshiko does not eat the paulita. If something quiz the cathy and the cathy incise the yoshiko then it quiz the paulita. The cathy is blue.", "logic": "\nFormulated(paulita)\nPowderise(paulita, yoshiko)\nQuiz(paulita, cathy)\nQuiz(paulita, yoshiko)\nIncise(cathy, yoshiko)\nnot Privileged(cathy)\nSlothful(cathy)\nPowderise(cathy, paulita)\nPowderise(cathy, yoshiko)\nQuiz(cathy, yoshiko)\nIncise(yoshiko, cathy)\nQuiz(yoshiko, cathy)\nforall x (Quiz(x, paulita) -> Powderise(paulita, cathy))\nforall x (Incise(x, yoshiko) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Powderise(x, paulita) -> Privileged(paulita))\nforall x (Incise(x, yoshiko) -> not Slothful(yoshiko))\nforall x (Powderise(x, cathy) -> not Quiz(cathy, paulita))\nforall x (Formulated(x) and not Quiz(x, cathy) -> not Powderise(cathy, paulita))\nPrivileged(yoshiko) and Powderise(yoshiko, cathy) -> not Incise(yoshiko, paulita)\nforall x (Quiz(x, cathy) and Incise(cathy, yoshiko) -> Quiz(x, paulita))\n\nBlue(cathy)\n\nBlue(cathy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The giovanne is uniate. The giovanne vomit the lem. The giovanne tremor the elysia. The giovanne tremor the lem. The elysia discipline the lem. The elysia is not inharmonic. The elysia is autotypic. The elysia vomit the giovanne. The elysia vomit the lem. The elysia tremor the lem. The lem discipline the elysia. The lem tremor the elysia. If something tremor the giovanne then the giovanne vomit the elysia. If something discipline the lem then it is victorian. If something vomit the giovanne then the giovanne is inharmonic. If something discipline the lem then the lem is not autotypic. If something vomit the elysia then the elysia does not need the giovanne. If something is uniate and it does not need the elysia then the elysia does not like the giovanne. If the lem is inharmonic and the lem vomit the elysia then the lem does not eat the giovanne. If something tremor the elysia and the elysia discipline the lem then it tremor the giovanne. The lem does not like the elysia.", "logic": "\nUniate(giovanne)\nVomit(giovanne, lem)\nTremor(giovanne, elysia)\nTremor(giovanne, lem)\nDiscipline(elysia, lem)\nnot Inharmonic(elysia)\nAutotypic(elysia)\nVomit(elysia, giovanne)\nVomit(elysia, lem)\nTremor(elysia, lem)\nDiscipline(lem, elysia)\nTremor(lem, elysia)\nforall x (Tremor(x, giovanne) -> Vomit(giovanne, elysia))\nforall x (Discipline(x, lem) -> Victorian(x))\nforall x (Vomit(x, giovanne) -> Inharmonic(giovanne))\nforall x (Discipline(x, lem) -> not Autotypic(lem))\nforall x (Vomit(x, elysia) -> not Tremor(elysia, giovanne))\nforall x (Uniate(x) and not Tremor(x, elysia) -> not Vomit(elysia, giovanne))\nInharmonic(lem) and Vomit(lem, elysia) -> not Discipline(lem, giovanne)\nforall x (Tremor(x, elysia) and Discipline(elysia, lem) -> Tremor(x, giovanne))\n\nnot Vomit(lem, elysia)\n\nnot Vomit(lem, elysia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The harlie is basilar. The harlie trust the amber. The harlie comminate the jilly. The harlie comminate the amber. The jilly account the amber. The jilly is not erstwhile. The jilly is flippant. The jilly trust the harlie. The jilly trust the amber. The jilly comminate the amber. The amber account the jilly. The amber comminate the jilly. If something comminate the harlie then the harlie trust the jilly. If something account the amber then it is phantom. If something trust the harlie then the harlie is erstwhile. If something account the amber then the amber is not flippant. If something trust the jilly then the jilly does not need the harlie. If something is basilar and it does not need the jilly then the jilly does not like the harlie. If the amber is erstwhile and the amber trust the jilly then the amber does not eat the harlie. If something comminate the jilly and the jilly account the amber then it comminate the harlie. The amber is blue.", "logic": "\nBasilar(harlie)\nTrust(harlie, amber)\nComminate(harlie, jilly)\nComminate(harlie, amber)\nAccount(jilly, amber)\nnot Erstwhile(jilly)\nFlippant(jilly)\nTrust(jilly, harlie)\nTrust(jilly, amber)\nComminate(jilly, amber)\nAccount(amber, jilly)\nComminate(amber, jilly)\nforall x (Comminate(x, harlie) -> Trust(harlie, jilly))\nforall x (Account(x, amber) -> Phantom(x))\nforall x (Trust(x, harlie) -> Erstwhile(harlie))\nforall x (Account(x, amber) -> not Flippant(amber))\nforall x (Trust(x, jilly) -> not Comminate(jilly, harlie))\nforall x (Basilar(x) and not Comminate(x, jilly) -> not Trust(jilly, harlie))\nErstwhile(amber) and Trust(amber, jilly) -> not Account(amber, harlie)\nforall x (Comminate(x, jilly) and Account(jilly, amber) -> Comminate(x, harlie))\n\nBlue(amber)\n\nBlue(amber) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The kathryne is galling. The kathryne rehash the giraldo. The kathryne remodel the judson. The kathryne remodel the giraldo. The judson sympathize the giraldo. The judson is not aphanitic. The judson is squared. The judson rehash the kathryne. The judson rehash the giraldo. The judson remodel the giraldo. The giraldo sympathize the judson. The giraldo remodel the judson. If something remodel the kathryne then the kathryne rehash the judson. If something sympathize the giraldo then it is imposed. If something rehash the kathryne then the kathryne is aphanitic. If something sympathize the giraldo then the giraldo is not squared. If something rehash the judson then the judson does not need the kathryne. If something is galling and it does not need the judson then the judson does not like the kathryne. If the giraldo is aphanitic and the giraldo rehash the judson then the giraldo does not eat the kathryne. If something remodel the judson and the judson sympathize the giraldo then it remodel the kathryne. The judson does not eat the kathryne.", "logic": "\nGalling(kathryne)\nRehash(kathryne, giraldo)\nRemodel(kathryne, judson)\nRemodel(kathryne, giraldo)\nSympathize(judson, giraldo)\nnot Aphanitic(judson)\nSquared(judson)\nRehash(judson, kathryne)\nRehash(judson, giraldo)\nRemodel(judson, giraldo)\nSympathize(giraldo, judson)\nRemodel(giraldo, judson)\nforall x (Remodel(x, kathryne) -> Rehash(kathryne, judson))\nforall x (Sympathize(x, giraldo) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Rehash(x, kathryne) -> Aphanitic(kathryne))\nforall x (Sympathize(x, giraldo) -> not Squared(giraldo))\nforall x (Rehash(x, judson) -> not Remodel(judson, kathryne))\nforall x (Galling(x) and not Remodel(x, judson) -> not Rehash(judson, kathryne))\nAphanitic(giraldo) and Rehash(giraldo, judson) -> not Sympathize(giraldo, kathryne)\nforall x (Remodel(x, judson) and Sympathize(judson, giraldo) -> Remodel(x, kathryne))\n\nnot Sympathize(judson, kathryne)\n\nnot Sympathize(judson, kathryne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The chip is cured. The chip misdate the walther. The chip tally the phyllys. The chip tally the walther. The phyllys monetize the walther. The phyllys is not disputable. The phyllys is retroflex. The phyllys misdate the chip. The phyllys misdate the walther. The phyllys tally the walther. The walther monetize the phyllys. The walther tally the phyllys. If something tally the chip then the chip misdate the phyllys. If something monetize the walther then it is coreferent. If something misdate the chip then the chip is disputable. If something monetize the walther then the walther is not retroflex. If something misdate the phyllys then the phyllys does not need the chip. If something is cured and it does not need the phyllys then the phyllys does not like the chip. If the walther is disputable and the walther misdate the phyllys then the walther does not eat the chip. If something tally the phyllys and the phyllys monetize the walther then it tally the chip. The chip is blue.", "logic": "\nCured(chip)\nMisdate(chip, walther)\nTally(chip, phyllys)\nTally(chip, walther)\nMonetize(phyllys, walther)\nnot Disputable(phyllys)\nRetroflex(phyllys)\nMisdate(phyllys, chip)\nMisdate(phyllys, walther)\nTally(phyllys, walther)\nMonetize(walther, phyllys)\nTally(walther, phyllys)\nforall x (Tally(x, chip) -> Misdate(chip, phyllys))\nforall x (Monetize(x, walther) -> Coreferent(x))\nforall x (Misdate(x, chip) -> Disputable(chip))\nforall x (Monetize(x, walther) -> not Retroflex(walther))\nforall x (Misdate(x, phyllys) -> not Tally(phyllys, chip))\nforall x (Cured(x) and not Tally(x, phyllys) -> not Misdate(phyllys, chip))\nDisputable(walther) and Misdate(walther, phyllys) -> not Monetize(walther, chip)\nforall x (Tally(x, phyllys) and Monetize(phyllys, walther) -> Tally(x, chip))\n\nBlue(chip)\n\nBlue(chip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "Fenelia is zymotic. All disturbing people are dandified. All zymotic people are disturbing. All dandified people are right. Fenelia is zymotic.", "logic": "\nZymotic(fenelia)\nforall x (Disturbing(x) -> Dandified(x))\nforall x (Zymotic(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Dandified(x) -> Right(x))\n\nZymotic(fenelia)\n\ntherefore Zymotic(fenelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Anatoly is incisive. All scant people are sloping. All incisive people are scant. All sloping people are bifilar. Anatoly is not incisive.", "logic": "\nIncisive(anatoly)\nforall x (Scant(x) -> Sloping(x))\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Scant(x))\nforall x (Sloping(x) -> Bifilar(x))\n\nnot Incisive(anatoly)\n\ntherefore Incisive(anatoly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Abigale is northward. All saxicolous people are validating. All northward people are saxicolous. All validating people are fizzing. Abigale is saxicolous.", "logic": "\nNorthward(abigale)\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) -> Validating(x))\nforall x (Northward(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Fizzing(x))\n\nSaxicolous(abigale)\n\nNorthward(abigale) and forall x (Northward(x) -> Saxicolous(x)) -> therefore Saxicolous(abigale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Judd is climbable. All even people are careless. All climbable people are even. All careless people are anorexic. Judd is not even.", "logic": "\nClimbable(judd)\nforall x (Even(x) -> Careless(x))\nforall x (Climbable(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Careless(x) -> Anorexic(x))\n\nnot Even(judd)\n\nClimbable(judd) and forall x (Climbable(x) -> Even(x)) -> therefore Even(judd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Gwendolin is totalistic. All arborous people are bottomless. All totalistic people are arborous. All bottomless people are nutlike. Gwendolin is bottomless.", "logic": "\nTotalistic(gwendolin)\nforall x (Arborous(x) -> Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Totalistic(x) -> Arborous(x))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) -> Nutlike(x))\n\nBottomless(gwendolin)\n\nTotalistic(gwendolin) and forall x (Totalistic(x) -> Arborous(x)) -> therefore Arborous(gwendolin) Arborous(gwendolin) and forall x (Arborous(x) -> Bottomless(x)) -> therefore Bottomless(gwendolin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Etienne is nodulose. All unemphatic people are exceeding. All nodulose people are unemphatic. All exceeding people are validated. Etienne is not exceeding.", "logic": "\nNodulose(etienne)\nforall x (Unemphatic(x) -> Exceeding(x))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Exceeding(x) -> Validated(x))\n\nnot Exceeding(etienne)\n\nNodulose(etienne) and forall x (Nodulose(x) -> Unemphatic(x)) -> therefore Unemphatic(etienne) Unemphatic(etienne) and forall x (Unemphatic(x) -> Exceeding(x)) -> therefore Exceeding(etienne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Ryann is caseous. All glossy people are uncharged. All caseous people are glossy. All uncharged people are unctuous. Ryann is unctuous.", "logic": "\nCaseous(ryann)\nforall x (Glossy(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) -> Glossy(x))\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Unctuous(x))\n\nUnctuous(ryann)\n\nCaseous(ryann) and forall x (Caseous(x) -> Glossy(x)) -> therefore Glossy(ryann) Glossy(ryann) and forall x (Glossy(x) -> Uncharged(x)) -> therefore Uncharged(ryann) Uncharged(ryann) and forall x (Uncharged(x) -> Unctuous(x)) -> therefore Unctuous(ryann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Harriette is granular. All yokelish people are schoolwide. All granular people are yokelish. All schoolwide people are pneumatic. Harriette is not pneumatic.", "logic": "\nGranular(harriette)\nforall x (Yokelish(x) -> Schoolwide(x))\nforall x (Granular(x) -> Yokelish(x))\nforall x (Schoolwide(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\n\nnot Pneumatic(harriette)\n\nGranular(harriette) and forall x (Granular(x) -> Yokelish(x)) -> therefore Yokelish(harriette) Yokelish(harriette) and forall x (Yokelish(x) -> Schoolwide(x)) -> therefore Schoolwide(harriette) Schoolwide(harriette) and forall x (Schoolwide(x) -> Pneumatic(x)) -> therefore Pneumatic(harriette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Karleen is vacant. All directive people are previous. All vacant people are directive. All previous people are enraged. Karleen is not white.", "logic": "\nVacant(karleen)\nforall x (Directive(x) -> Previous(x))\nforall x (Vacant(x) -> Directive(x))\nforall x (Previous(x) -> Enraged(x))\n\nnot White(karleen)\n\nnot White(karleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Zak is tricky. All castrated people are noxious. All tricky people are castrated. All noxious people are under. Zak is rough.", "logic": "\nTricky(zak)\nforall x (Castrated(x) -> Noxious(x))\nforall x (Tricky(x) -> Castrated(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Under(x))\n\nRough(zak)\n\nRough(zak) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "The mart trade the colbert. The mart is not evidenced. The jonathon does not chase the mart. The jonathon wiretap the aubrette. The jonathon does not eat the colbert. The jonathon is nettlesome. The jonathon is evidenced. The jonathon does not need the colbert. The colbert snipe the mart. The aubrette wiretap the jonathon. The aubrette wiretap the colbert. The aubrette does not eat the jonathon. The aubrette is smutty. The aubrette is evidenced. The aubrette snipe the mart. The aubrette snipe the jonathon. If the aubrette does not chase the jonathon then the aubrette wiretap the mart. If something snipe the aubrette then it wiretap the aubrette. If something is evidenced then it snipe the jonathon. If the colbert wiretap the aubrette then the aubrette is nettlesome. If something trade the colbert then the colbert snipe the aubrette. If the jonathon trade the aubrette and the jonathon wiretap the mart then the mart snipe the colbert. The jonathon wiretap the aubrette.", "logic": "\nTrade(mart, colbert)\nnot Evidenced(mart)\nnot Wiretap(jonathon, mart)\nWiretap(jonathon, aubrette)\nnot Trade(jonathon, colbert)\nNettlesome(jonathon)\nEvidenced(jonathon)\nnot Snipe(jonathon, colbert)\nSnipe(colbert, mart)\nWiretap(aubrette, jonathon)\nWiretap(aubrette, colbert)\nnot Trade(aubrette, jonathon)\nSmutty(aubrette)\nEvidenced(aubrette)\nSnipe(aubrette, mart)\nSnipe(aubrette, jonathon)\nnot Wiretap(aubrette, jonathon) -> Wiretap(aubrette, mart)\nforall x (Snipe(x, aubrette) -> Wiretap(x, aubrette))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) -> Snipe(x, jonathon))\nWiretap(colbert, aubrette) -> Nettlesome(aubrette)\nforall x (Trade(x, colbert) -> Snipe(colbert, aubrette))\nTrade(jonathon, aubrette) and Wiretap(jonathon, mart) -> Snipe(mart, colbert)\n\nWiretap(jonathon, aubrette)\n\ntherefore Wiretap(jonathon, aubrette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The dacy chronicle the scarface. The dacy is not anchoritic. The nomi does not chase the dacy. The nomi speciate the ilona. The nomi does not eat the scarface. The nomi is slipping. The nomi is anchoritic. The nomi does not need the scarface. The scarface correlate the dacy. The ilona speciate the nomi. The ilona speciate the scarface. The ilona does not eat the nomi. The ilona is hearable. The ilona is anchoritic. The ilona correlate the dacy. The ilona correlate the nomi. If the ilona does not chase the nomi then the ilona speciate the dacy. If something correlate the ilona then it speciate the ilona. If something is anchoritic then it correlate the nomi. If the scarface speciate the ilona then the ilona is slipping. If something chronicle the scarface then the scarface correlate the ilona. If the nomi chronicle the ilona and the nomi speciate the dacy then the dacy correlate the scarface. The nomi is not anchoritic.", "logic": "\nChronicle(dacy, scarface)\nnot Anchoritic(dacy)\nnot Speciate(nomi, dacy)\nSpeciate(nomi, ilona)\nnot Chronicle(nomi, scarface)\nSlipping(nomi)\nAnchoritic(nomi)\nnot Correlate(nomi, scarface)\nCorrelate(scarface, dacy)\nSpeciate(ilona, nomi)\nSpeciate(ilona, scarface)\nnot Chronicle(ilona, nomi)\nHearable(ilona)\nAnchoritic(ilona)\nCorrelate(ilona, dacy)\nCorrelate(ilona, nomi)\nnot Speciate(ilona, nomi) -> Speciate(ilona, dacy)\nforall x (Correlate(x, ilona) -> Speciate(x, ilona))\nforall x (Anchoritic(x) -> Correlate(x, nomi))\nSpeciate(scarface, ilona) -> Slipping(ilona)\nforall x (Chronicle(x, scarface) -> Correlate(scarface, ilona))\nChronicle(nomi, ilona) and Speciate(nomi, dacy) -> Correlate(dacy, scarface)\n\nnot Anchoritic(nomi)\n\ntherefore Anchoritic(nomi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The hilary decouple the sharona. The hilary is not lowbrow. The sidonnie does not chase the hilary. The sidonnie remunerate the costa. The sidonnie does not eat the sharona. The sidonnie is protozoan. The sidonnie is lowbrow. The sidonnie does not need the sharona. The sharona queue the hilary. The costa remunerate the sidonnie. The costa remunerate the sharona. The costa does not eat the sidonnie. The costa is wigged. The costa is lowbrow. The costa queue the hilary. The costa queue the sidonnie. If the costa does not chase the sidonnie then the costa remunerate the hilary. If something queue the costa then it remunerate the costa. If something is lowbrow then it queue the sidonnie. If the sharona remunerate the costa then the costa is protozoan. If something decouple the sharona then the sharona queue the costa. If the sidonnie decouple the costa and the sidonnie remunerate the hilary then the hilary queue the sharona. The sidonnie queue the sidonnie.", "logic": "\nDecouple(hilary, sharona)\nnot Lowbrow(hilary)\nnot Remunerate(sidonnie, hilary)\nRemunerate(sidonnie, costa)\nnot Decouple(sidonnie, sharona)\nProtozoan(sidonnie)\nLowbrow(sidonnie)\nnot Queue(sidonnie, sharona)\nQueue(sharona, hilary)\nRemunerate(costa, sidonnie)\nRemunerate(costa, sharona)\nnot Decouple(costa, sidonnie)\nWigged(costa)\nLowbrow(costa)\nQueue(costa, hilary)\nQueue(costa, sidonnie)\nnot Remunerate(costa, sidonnie) -> Remunerate(costa, hilary)\nforall x (Queue(x, costa) -> Remunerate(x, costa))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Queue(x, sidonnie))\nRemunerate(sharona, costa) -> Protozoan(costa)\nforall x (Decouple(x, sharona) -> Queue(sharona, costa))\nDecouple(sidonnie, costa) and Remunerate(sidonnie, hilary) -> Queue(hilary, sharona)\n\nQueue(sidonnie, sidonnie)\n\nLowbrow(sidonnie) and forall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Queue(x, sidonnie)) -> therefore Queue(sidonnie, sidonnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The adriane robe the georgine. The adriane is not malefic. The theodor does not chase the adriane. The theodor retract the sherrie. The theodor does not eat the georgine. The theodor is undersexed. The theodor is malefic. The theodor does not need the georgine. The georgine azure the adriane. The sherrie retract the theodor. The sherrie retract the georgine. The sherrie does not eat the theodor. The sherrie is uric. The sherrie is malefic. The sherrie azure the adriane. The sherrie azure the theodor. If the sherrie does not chase the theodor then the sherrie retract the adriane. If something azure the sherrie then it retract the sherrie. If something is malefic then it azure the theodor. If the georgine retract the sherrie then the sherrie is undersexed. If something robe the georgine then the georgine azure the sherrie. If the theodor robe the sherrie and the theodor retract the adriane then the adriane azure the georgine. The theodor does not need the theodor.", "logic": "\nRobe(adriane, georgine)\nnot Malefic(adriane)\nnot Retract(theodor, adriane)\nRetract(theodor, sherrie)\nnot Robe(theodor, georgine)\nUndersexed(theodor)\nMalefic(theodor)\nnot Azure(theodor, georgine)\nAzure(georgine, adriane)\nRetract(sherrie, theodor)\nRetract(sherrie, georgine)\nnot Robe(sherrie, theodor)\nUric(sherrie)\nMalefic(sherrie)\nAzure(sherrie, adriane)\nAzure(sherrie, theodor)\nnot Retract(sherrie, theodor) -> Retract(sherrie, adriane)\nforall x (Azure(x, sherrie) -> Retract(x, sherrie))\nforall x (Malefic(x) -> Azure(x, theodor))\nRetract(georgine, sherrie) -> Undersexed(sherrie)\nforall x (Robe(x, georgine) -> Azure(georgine, sherrie))\nRobe(theodor, sherrie) and Retract(theodor, adriane) -> Azure(adriane, georgine)\n\nnot Azure(theodor, theodor)\n\nMalefic(theodor) and forall x (Malefic(x) -> Azure(x, theodor)) -> therefore Azure(theodor, theodor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The alvin undershoot the camile. The alvin is not uncut. The willis does not chase the alvin. The willis graph the billy. The willis does not eat the camile. The willis is outcast. The willis is uncut. The willis does not need the camile. The camile tailor the alvin. The billy graph the willis. The billy graph the camile. The billy does not eat the willis. The billy is outdated. The billy is uncut. The billy tailor the alvin. The billy tailor the willis. If the billy does not chase the willis then the billy graph the alvin. If something tailor the billy then it graph the billy. If something is uncut then it tailor the willis. If the camile graph the billy then the billy is outcast. If something undershoot the camile then the camile tailor the billy. If the willis undershoot the billy and the willis graph the alvin then the alvin tailor the camile. The camile graph the billy.", "logic": "\nUndershoot(alvin, camile)\nnot Uncut(alvin)\nnot Graph(willis, alvin)\nGraph(willis, billy)\nnot Undershoot(willis, camile)\nOutcast(willis)\nUncut(willis)\nnot Tailor(willis, camile)\nTailor(camile, alvin)\nGraph(billy, willis)\nGraph(billy, camile)\nnot Undershoot(billy, willis)\nOutdated(billy)\nUncut(billy)\nTailor(billy, alvin)\nTailor(billy, willis)\nnot Graph(billy, willis) -> Graph(billy, alvin)\nforall x (Tailor(x, billy) -> Graph(x, billy))\nforall x (Uncut(x) -> Tailor(x, willis))\nGraph(camile, billy) -> Outcast(billy)\nforall x (Undershoot(x, camile) -> Tailor(camile, billy))\nUndershoot(willis, billy) and Graph(willis, alvin) -> Tailor(alvin, camile)\n\nGraph(camile, billy)\n\nUndershoot(alvin, camile) and forall x (Undershoot(x, camile) -> Tailor(camile, billy)) -> therefore Tailor(camile, billy) Tailor(camile, billy) and forall x (Tailor(x, billy) -> Graph(x, billy)) -> therefore Graph(camile, billy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The morton confess the appolonia. The morton is not fourteen. The wylma does not chase the morton. The wylma echo the spike. The wylma does not eat the appolonia. The wylma is dignifying. The wylma is fourteen. The wylma does not need the appolonia. The appolonia kitten the morton. The spike echo the wylma. The spike echo the appolonia. The spike does not eat the wylma. The spike is heterodyne. The spike is fourteen. The spike kitten the morton. The spike kitten the wylma. If the spike does not chase the wylma then the spike echo the morton. If something kitten the spike then it echo the spike. If something is fourteen then it kitten the wylma. If the appolonia echo the spike then the spike is dignifying. If something confess the appolonia then the appolonia kitten the spike. If the wylma confess the spike and the wylma echo the morton then the morton kitten the appolonia. The appolonia does not chase the spike.", "logic": "\nConfess(morton, appolonia)\nnot Fourteen(morton)\nnot Echo(wylma, morton)\nEcho(wylma, spike)\nnot Confess(wylma, appolonia)\nDignifying(wylma)\nFourteen(wylma)\nnot Kitten(wylma, appolonia)\nKitten(appolonia, morton)\nEcho(spike, wylma)\nEcho(spike, appolonia)\nnot Confess(spike, wylma)\nHeterodyne(spike)\nFourteen(spike)\nKitten(spike, morton)\nKitten(spike, wylma)\nnot Echo(spike, wylma) -> Echo(spike, morton)\nforall x (Kitten(x, spike) -> Echo(x, spike))\nforall x (Fourteen(x) -> Kitten(x, wylma))\nEcho(appolonia, spike) -> Dignifying(spike)\nforall x (Confess(x, appolonia) -> Kitten(appolonia, spike))\nConfess(wylma, spike) and Echo(wylma, morton) -> Kitten(morton, appolonia)\n\nnot Echo(appolonia, spike)\n\nConfess(morton, appolonia) and forall x (Confess(x, appolonia) -> Kitten(appolonia, spike)) -> therefore Kitten(appolonia, spike) Kitten(appolonia, spike) and forall x (Kitten(x, spike) -> Echo(x, spike)) -> therefore Echo(appolonia, spike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The becki discuss the fyodor. The becki is not athirst. The pippy does not chase the becki. The pippy circuit the armstrong. The pippy does not eat the fyodor. The pippy is spectacled. The pippy is athirst. The pippy does not need the fyodor. The fyodor content the becki. The armstrong circuit the pippy. The armstrong circuit the fyodor. The armstrong does not eat the pippy. The armstrong is assamese. The armstrong is athirst. The armstrong content the becki. The armstrong content the pippy. If the armstrong does not chase the pippy then the armstrong circuit the becki. If something content the armstrong then it circuit the armstrong. If something is athirst then it content the pippy. If the fyodor circuit the armstrong then the armstrong is spectacled. If something discuss the fyodor then the fyodor content the armstrong. If the pippy discuss the armstrong and the pippy circuit the becki then the becki content the fyodor. The armstrong is spectacled.", "logic": "\nDiscuss(becki, fyodor)\nnot Athirst(becki)\nnot Circuit(pippy, becki)\nCircuit(pippy, armstrong)\nnot Discuss(pippy, fyodor)\nSpectacled(pippy)\nAthirst(pippy)\nnot Content(pippy, fyodor)\nContent(fyodor, becki)\nCircuit(armstrong, pippy)\nCircuit(armstrong, fyodor)\nnot Discuss(armstrong, pippy)\nAssamese(armstrong)\nAthirst(armstrong)\nContent(armstrong, becki)\nContent(armstrong, pippy)\nnot Circuit(armstrong, pippy) -> Circuit(armstrong, becki)\nforall x (Content(x, armstrong) -> Circuit(x, armstrong))\nforall x (Athirst(x) -> Content(x, pippy))\nCircuit(fyodor, armstrong) -> Spectacled(armstrong)\nforall x (Discuss(x, fyodor) -> Content(fyodor, armstrong))\nDiscuss(pippy, armstrong) and Circuit(pippy, becki) -> Content(becki, fyodor)\n\nSpectacled(armstrong)\n\nDiscuss(becki, fyodor) and forall x (Discuss(x, fyodor) -> Content(fyodor, armstrong)) -> therefore Content(fyodor, armstrong) Content(fyodor, armstrong) and forall x (Content(x, armstrong) -> Circuit(x, armstrong)) -> therefore Circuit(fyodor, armstrong) Circuit(fyodor, armstrong) and Circuit(fyodor, armstrong) -> Spectacled(armstrong) -> therefore Spectacled(armstrong)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The maryl accession the lorelei. The maryl is not overbold. The galina does not chase the maryl. The galina adsorb the francis. The galina does not eat the lorelei. The galina is mythologic. The galina is overbold. The galina does not need the lorelei. The lorelei reignite the maryl. The francis adsorb the galina. The francis adsorb the lorelei. The francis does not eat the galina. The francis is sane. The francis is overbold. The francis reignite the maryl. The francis reignite the galina. If the francis does not chase the galina then the francis adsorb the maryl. If something reignite the francis then it adsorb the francis. If something is overbold then it reignite the galina. If the lorelei adsorb the francis then the francis is mythologic. If something accession the lorelei then the lorelei reignite the francis. If the galina accession the francis and the galina adsorb the maryl then the maryl reignite the lorelei. The francis is not mythologic.", "logic": "\nAccession(maryl, lorelei)\nnot Overbold(maryl)\nnot Adsorb(galina, maryl)\nAdsorb(galina, francis)\nnot Accession(galina, lorelei)\nMythologic(galina)\nOverbold(galina)\nnot Reignite(galina, lorelei)\nReignite(lorelei, maryl)\nAdsorb(francis, galina)\nAdsorb(francis, lorelei)\nnot Accession(francis, galina)\nSane(francis)\nOverbold(francis)\nReignite(francis, maryl)\nReignite(francis, galina)\nnot Adsorb(francis, galina) -> Adsorb(francis, maryl)\nforall x (Reignite(x, francis) -> Adsorb(x, francis))\nforall x (Overbold(x) -> Reignite(x, galina))\nAdsorb(lorelei, francis) -> Mythologic(francis)\nforall x (Accession(x, lorelei) -> Reignite(lorelei, francis))\nAccession(galina, francis) and Adsorb(galina, maryl) -> Reignite(maryl, lorelei)\n\nnot Mythologic(francis)\n\nAccession(maryl, lorelei) and forall x (Accession(x, lorelei) -> Reignite(lorelei, francis)) -> therefore Reignite(lorelei, francis) Reignite(lorelei, francis) and forall x (Reignite(x, francis) -> Adsorb(x, francis)) -> therefore Adsorb(lorelei, francis) Adsorb(lorelei, francis) and Adsorb(lorelei, francis) -> Mythologic(francis) -> therefore Mythologic(francis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The shadow bother the conny. The shadow is not curst. The magdalena does not chase the shadow. The magdalena state the maritsa. The magdalena does not eat the conny. The magdalena is devalued. The magdalena is curst. The magdalena does not need the conny. The conny scribe the shadow. The maritsa state the magdalena. The maritsa state the conny. The maritsa does not eat the magdalena. The maritsa is poisonous. The maritsa is curst. The maritsa scribe the shadow. The maritsa scribe the magdalena. If the maritsa does not chase the magdalena then the maritsa state the shadow. If something scribe the maritsa then it state the maritsa. If something is curst then it scribe the magdalena. If the conny state the maritsa then the maritsa is devalued. If something bother the conny then the conny scribe the maritsa. If the magdalena bother the maritsa and the magdalena state the shadow then the shadow scribe the conny. The shadow does not chase the maritsa.", "logic": "\nBother(shadow, conny)\nnot Curst(shadow)\nnot State(magdalena, shadow)\nState(magdalena, maritsa)\nnot Bother(magdalena, conny)\nDevalued(magdalena)\nCurst(magdalena)\nnot Scribe(magdalena, conny)\nScribe(conny, shadow)\nState(maritsa, magdalena)\nState(maritsa, conny)\nnot Bother(maritsa, magdalena)\nPoisonous(maritsa)\nCurst(maritsa)\nScribe(maritsa, shadow)\nScribe(maritsa, magdalena)\nnot State(maritsa, magdalena) -> State(maritsa, shadow)\nforall x (Scribe(x, maritsa) -> State(x, maritsa))\nforall x (Curst(x) -> Scribe(x, magdalena))\nState(conny, maritsa) -> Devalued(maritsa)\nforall x (Bother(x, conny) -> Scribe(conny, maritsa))\nBother(magdalena, maritsa) and State(magdalena, shadow) -> Scribe(shadow, conny)\n\nnot State(shadow, maritsa)\n\nforall x (Scribe(x, maritsa) -> State(x, maritsa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The genna dissonate the fernando. The genna is not spread. The stephie does not chase the genna. The stephie whirlpool the sella. The stephie does not eat the fernando. The stephie is analogical. The stephie is spread. The stephie does not need the fernando. The fernando cornice the genna. The sella whirlpool the stephie. The sella whirlpool the fernando. The sella does not eat the stephie. The sella is mohammedan. The sella is spread. The sella cornice the genna. The sella cornice the stephie. If the sella does not chase the stephie then the sella whirlpool the genna. If something cornice the sella then it whirlpool the sella. If something is spread then it cornice the stephie. If the fernando whirlpool the sella then the sella is analogical. If something dissonate the fernando then the fernando cornice the sella. If the stephie dissonate the sella and the stephie whirlpool the genna then the genna cornice the fernando. The sella whirlpool the sella.", "logic": "\nDissonate(genna, fernando)\nnot Spread(genna)\nnot Whirlpool(stephie, genna)\nWhirlpool(stephie, sella)\nnot Dissonate(stephie, fernando)\nAnalogical(stephie)\nSpread(stephie)\nnot Cornice(stephie, fernando)\nCornice(fernando, genna)\nWhirlpool(sella, stephie)\nWhirlpool(sella, fernando)\nnot Dissonate(sella, stephie)\nMohammedan(sella)\nSpread(sella)\nCornice(sella, genna)\nCornice(sella, stephie)\nnot Whirlpool(sella, stephie) -> Whirlpool(sella, genna)\nforall x (Cornice(x, sella) -> Whirlpool(x, sella))\nforall x (Spread(x) -> Cornice(x, stephie))\nWhirlpool(fernando, sella) -> Analogical(sella)\nforall x (Dissonate(x, fernando) -> Cornice(fernando, sella))\nDissonate(stephie, sella) and Whirlpool(stephie, genna) -> Cornice(genna, fernando)\n\nWhirlpool(sella, sella)\n\nforall x (Cornice(x, sella) -> Whirlpool(x, sella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The blinnie squash the beryl. The blinnie is not pressed. The muhammad does not chase the blinnie. The muhammad lurk the ashli. The muhammad does not eat the beryl. The muhammad is thespian. The muhammad is pressed. The muhammad does not need the beryl. The beryl retry the blinnie. The ashli lurk the muhammad. The ashli lurk the beryl. The ashli does not eat the muhammad. The ashli is sometime. The ashli is pressed. The ashli retry the blinnie. The ashli retry the muhammad. If the ashli does not chase the muhammad then the ashli lurk the blinnie. If something retry the ashli then it lurk the ashli. If something is pressed then it retry the muhammad. If the beryl lurk the ashli then the ashli is thespian. If something squash the beryl then the beryl retry the ashli. If the muhammad squash the ashli and the muhammad lurk the blinnie then the blinnie retry the beryl. The blinnie does not need the beryl.", "logic": "\nSquash(blinnie, beryl)\nnot Pressed(blinnie)\nnot Lurk(muhammad, blinnie)\nLurk(muhammad, ashli)\nnot Squash(muhammad, beryl)\nThespian(muhammad)\nPressed(muhammad)\nnot Retry(muhammad, beryl)\nRetry(beryl, blinnie)\nLurk(ashli, muhammad)\nLurk(ashli, beryl)\nnot Squash(ashli, muhammad)\nSometime(ashli)\nPressed(ashli)\nRetry(ashli, blinnie)\nRetry(ashli, muhammad)\nnot Lurk(ashli, muhammad) -> Lurk(ashli, blinnie)\nforall x (Retry(x, ashli) -> Lurk(x, ashli))\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Retry(x, muhammad))\nLurk(beryl, ashli) -> Thespian(ashli)\nforall x (Squash(x, beryl) -> Retry(beryl, ashli))\nSquash(muhammad, ashli) and Lurk(muhammad, blinnie) -> Retry(blinnie, beryl)\n\nnot Retry(blinnie, beryl)\n\nSquash(muhammad, ashli) and Lurk(muhammad, blinnie) -> Retry(blinnie, beryl) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The lina affiliate the kermie. The lina is not overland. The cassie does not chase the lina. The cassie valet the petr. The cassie does not eat the kermie. The cassie is expandable. The cassie is overland. The cassie does not need the kermie. The kermie pulverize the lina. The petr valet the cassie. The petr valet the kermie. The petr does not eat the cassie. The petr is airtight. The petr is overland. The petr pulverize the lina. The petr pulverize the cassie. If the petr does not chase the cassie then the petr valet the lina. If something pulverize the petr then it valet the petr. If something is overland then it pulverize the cassie. If the kermie valet the petr then the petr is expandable. If something affiliate the kermie then the kermie pulverize the petr. If the cassie affiliate the petr and the cassie valet the lina then the lina pulverize the kermie. The lina pulverize the cassie.", "logic": "\nAffiliate(lina, kermie)\nnot Overland(lina)\nnot Valet(cassie, lina)\nValet(cassie, petr)\nnot Affiliate(cassie, kermie)\nExpandable(cassie)\nOverland(cassie)\nnot Pulverize(cassie, kermie)\nPulverize(kermie, lina)\nValet(petr, cassie)\nValet(petr, kermie)\nnot Affiliate(petr, cassie)\nAirtight(petr)\nOverland(petr)\nPulverize(petr, lina)\nPulverize(petr, cassie)\nnot Valet(petr, cassie) -> Valet(petr, lina)\nforall x (Pulverize(x, petr) -> Valet(x, petr))\nforall x (Overland(x) -> Pulverize(x, cassie))\nValet(kermie, petr) -> Expandable(petr)\nforall x (Affiliate(x, kermie) -> Pulverize(kermie, petr))\nAffiliate(cassie, petr) and Valet(cassie, lina) -> Pulverize(lina, kermie)\n\nPulverize(lina, cassie)\n\nforall x (Overland(x) -> Pulverize(x, cassie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The anna clutter the thain. The anna is not unsized. The laureen does not chase the anna. The laureen pillory the warde. The laureen does not eat the thain. The laureen is elusive. The laureen is unsized. The laureen does not need the thain. The thain lexicalise the anna. The warde pillory the laureen. The warde pillory the thain. The warde does not eat the laureen. The warde is mediatory. The warde is unsized. The warde lexicalise the anna. The warde lexicalise the laureen. If the warde does not chase the laureen then the warde pillory the anna. If something lexicalise the warde then it pillory the warde. If something is unsized then it lexicalise the laureen. If the thain pillory the warde then the warde is elusive. If something clutter the thain then the thain lexicalise the warde. If the laureen clutter the warde and the laureen pillory the anna then the anna lexicalise the thain. The anna is not big.", "logic": "\nClutter(anna, thain)\nnot Unsized(anna)\nnot Pillory(laureen, anna)\nPillory(laureen, warde)\nnot Clutter(laureen, thain)\nElusive(laureen)\nUnsized(laureen)\nnot Lexicalise(laureen, thain)\nLexicalise(thain, anna)\nPillory(warde, laureen)\nPillory(warde, thain)\nnot Clutter(warde, laureen)\nMediatory(warde)\nUnsized(warde)\nLexicalise(warde, anna)\nLexicalise(warde, laureen)\nnot Pillory(warde, laureen) -> Pillory(warde, anna)\nforall x (Lexicalise(x, warde) -> Pillory(x, warde))\nforall x (Unsized(x) -> Lexicalise(x, laureen))\nPillory(thain, warde) -> Elusive(warde)\nforall x (Clutter(x, thain) -> Lexicalise(thain, warde))\nClutter(laureen, warde) and Pillory(laureen, anna) -> Lexicalise(anna, thain)\n\nnot Big(anna)\n\nnot Big(anna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The janene release the linnet. The janene is not achromic. The marleah does not chase the janene. The marleah telegraph the ingeberg. The marleah does not eat the linnet. The marleah is pardonable. The marleah is achromic. The marleah does not need the linnet. The linnet islamize the janene. The ingeberg telegraph the marleah. The ingeberg telegraph the linnet. The ingeberg does not eat the marleah. The ingeberg is thai. The ingeberg is achromic. The ingeberg islamize the janene. The ingeberg islamize the marleah. If the ingeberg does not chase the marleah then the ingeberg telegraph the janene. If something islamize the ingeberg then it telegraph the ingeberg. If something is achromic then it islamize the marleah. If the linnet telegraph the ingeberg then the ingeberg is pardonable. If something release the linnet then the linnet islamize the ingeberg. If the marleah release the ingeberg and the marleah telegraph the janene then the janene islamize the linnet. The ingeberg release the ingeberg.", "logic": "\nRelease(janene, linnet)\nnot Achromic(janene)\nnot Telegraph(marleah, janene)\nTelegraph(marleah, ingeberg)\nnot Release(marleah, linnet)\nPardonable(marleah)\nAchromic(marleah)\nnot Islamize(marleah, linnet)\nIslamize(linnet, janene)\nTelegraph(ingeberg, marleah)\nTelegraph(ingeberg, linnet)\nnot Release(ingeberg, marleah)\nThai(ingeberg)\nAchromic(ingeberg)\nIslamize(ingeberg, janene)\nIslamize(ingeberg, marleah)\nnot Telegraph(ingeberg, marleah) -> Telegraph(ingeberg, janene)\nforall x (Islamize(x, ingeberg) -> Telegraph(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Achromic(x) -> Islamize(x, marleah))\nTelegraph(linnet, ingeberg) -> Pardonable(ingeberg)\nforall x (Release(x, linnet) -> Islamize(linnet, ingeberg))\nRelease(marleah, ingeberg) and Telegraph(marleah, janene) -> Islamize(janene, linnet)\n\nRelease(ingeberg, ingeberg)\n\nRelease(ingeberg, ingeberg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The russel stucco the natalee. The russel is not picaresque. The rex does not chase the russel. The rex pussyfoot the cassandry. The rex does not eat the natalee. The rex is unbaptised. The rex is picaresque. The rex does not need the natalee. The natalee balance the russel. The cassandry pussyfoot the rex. The cassandry pussyfoot the natalee. The cassandry does not eat the rex. The cassandry is maculate. The cassandry is picaresque. The cassandry balance the russel. The cassandry balance the rex. If the cassandry does not chase the rex then the cassandry pussyfoot the russel. If something balance the cassandry then it pussyfoot the cassandry. If something is picaresque then it balance the rex. If the natalee pussyfoot the cassandry then the cassandry is unbaptised. If something stucco the natalee then the natalee balance the cassandry. If the rex stucco the cassandry and the rex pussyfoot the russel then the russel balance the natalee. The natalee is not unbaptised.", "logic": "\nStucco(russel, natalee)\nnot Picaresque(russel)\nnot Pussyfoot(rex, russel)\nPussyfoot(rex, cassandry)\nnot Stucco(rex, natalee)\nUnbaptised(rex)\nPicaresque(rex)\nnot Balance(rex, natalee)\nBalance(natalee, russel)\nPussyfoot(cassandry, rex)\nPussyfoot(cassandry, natalee)\nnot Stucco(cassandry, rex)\nMaculate(cassandry)\nPicaresque(cassandry)\nBalance(cassandry, russel)\nBalance(cassandry, rex)\nnot Pussyfoot(cassandry, rex) -> Pussyfoot(cassandry, russel)\nforall x (Balance(x, cassandry) -> Pussyfoot(x, cassandry))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) -> Balance(x, rex))\nPussyfoot(natalee, cassandry) -> Unbaptised(cassandry)\nforall x (Stucco(x, natalee) -> Balance(natalee, cassandry))\nStucco(rex, cassandry) and Pussyfoot(rex, russel) -> Balance(russel, natalee)\n\nnot Unbaptised(natalee)\n\nnot Unbaptised(natalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The adrea interlace the angelo. The adrea is not unratable. The jasmin does not chase the adrea. The jasmin babble the sheffield. The jasmin does not eat the angelo. The jasmin is monaural. The jasmin is unratable. The jasmin does not need the angelo. The angelo article the adrea. The sheffield babble the jasmin. The sheffield babble the angelo. The sheffield does not eat the jasmin. The sheffield is arthurian. The sheffield is unratable. The sheffield article the adrea. The sheffield article the jasmin. If the sheffield does not chase the jasmin then the sheffield babble the adrea. If something article the sheffield then it babble the sheffield. If something is unratable then it article the jasmin. If the angelo babble the sheffield then the sheffield is monaural. If something interlace the angelo then the angelo article the sheffield. If the jasmin interlace the sheffield and the jasmin babble the adrea then the adrea article the angelo. The angelo is kind.", "logic": "\nInterlace(adrea, angelo)\nnot Unratable(adrea)\nnot Babble(jasmin, adrea)\nBabble(jasmin, sheffield)\nnot Interlace(jasmin, angelo)\nMonaural(jasmin)\nUnratable(jasmin)\nnot Article(jasmin, angelo)\nArticle(angelo, adrea)\nBabble(sheffield, jasmin)\nBabble(sheffield, angelo)\nnot Interlace(sheffield, jasmin)\nArthurian(sheffield)\nUnratable(sheffield)\nArticle(sheffield, adrea)\nArticle(sheffield, jasmin)\nnot Babble(sheffield, jasmin) -> Babble(sheffield, adrea)\nforall x (Article(x, sheffield) -> Babble(x, sheffield))\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Article(x, jasmin))\nBabble(angelo, sheffield) -> Monaural(sheffield)\nforall x (Interlace(x, angelo) -> Article(angelo, sheffield))\nInterlace(jasmin, sheffield) and Babble(jasmin, adrea) -> Article(adrea, angelo)\n\nKind(angelo)\n\nKind(angelo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The alfie acquire the elene. The alfie is plump. The alfie is volunteer. The alfie is categorial. The alfie is radio. The alfie refine the elene. The alfie queen the elene. The elene acquire the alfie. The elene is volunteer. The elene is categorial. If something refine the elene then it queen the elene. If something is plump and it queen the alfie then it refine the elene. If something acquire the alfie then it is apposite. If something is apposite and it acquire the alfie then it refine the elene. If something acquire the alfie then the alfie refine the elene. If something acquire the alfie then it is volunteer. If something refine the elene and it is apposite then it refine the alfie. If something is volunteer and apposite then it refine the alfie. The alfie refine the elene.", "logic": "\nAcquire(alfie, elene)\nPlump(alfie)\nVolunteer(alfie)\nCategorial(alfie)\nRadio(alfie)\nRefine(alfie, elene)\nQueen(alfie, elene)\nAcquire(elene, alfie)\nVolunteer(elene)\nCategorial(elene)\nforall x (Refine(x, elene) -> Queen(x, elene))\nforall x (Plump(x) and Queen(x, alfie) -> Refine(x, elene))\nforall x (Acquire(x, alfie) -> Apposite(x))\nforall x (Apposite(x) and Acquire(x, alfie) -> Refine(x, elene))\nforall x (Acquire(x, alfie) -> Refine(alfie, elene))\nforall x (Acquire(x, alfie) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Refine(x, elene) and Apposite(x) -> Refine(x, alfie))\nforall x (Volunteer(x) and Apposite(x) -> Refine(x, alfie))\n\nRefine(alfie, elene)\n\ntherefore Refine(alfie, elene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The kristina arrest the clementia. The kristina is unmarried. The kristina is steaming. The kristina is trillion. The kristina is ironclad. The kristina dissemble the clementia. The kristina maledict the clementia. The clementia arrest the kristina. The clementia is steaming. The clementia is trillion. If something dissemble the clementia then it maledict the clementia. If something is unmarried and it maledict the kristina then it dissemble the clementia. If something arrest the kristina then it is eyed. If something is eyed and it arrest the kristina then it dissemble the clementia. If something arrest the kristina then the kristina dissemble the clementia. If something arrest the kristina then it is steaming. If something dissemble the clementia and it is eyed then it dissemble the kristina. If something is steaming and eyed then it dissemble the kristina. The kristina is not steaming.", "logic": "\nArrest(kristina, clementia)\nUnmarried(kristina)\nSteaming(kristina)\nTrillion(kristina)\nIronclad(kristina)\nDissemble(kristina, clementia)\nMaledict(kristina, clementia)\nArrest(clementia, kristina)\nSteaming(clementia)\nTrillion(clementia)\nforall x (Dissemble(x, clementia) -> Maledict(x, clementia))\nforall x (Unmarried(x) and Maledict(x, kristina) -> Dissemble(x, clementia))\nforall x (Arrest(x, kristina) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) and Arrest(x, kristina) -> Dissemble(x, clementia))\nforall x (Arrest(x, kristina) -> Dissemble(kristina, clementia))\nforall x (Arrest(x, kristina) -> Steaming(x))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, clementia) and Eyed(x) -> Dissemble(x, kristina))\nforall x (Steaming(x) and Eyed(x) -> Dissemble(x, kristina))\n\nnot Steaming(kristina)\n\ntherefore Steaming(kristina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The ruddie clash the annetta. The ruddie is myelinated. The ruddie is falconine. The ruddie is sabbatical. The ruddie is premature. The ruddie braille the annetta. The ruddie castle the annetta. The annetta clash the ruddie. The annetta is falconine. The annetta is sabbatical. If something braille the annetta then it castle the annetta. If something is myelinated and it castle the ruddie then it braille the annetta. If something clash the ruddie then it is springless. If something is springless and it clash the ruddie then it braille the annetta. If something clash the ruddie then the ruddie braille the annetta. If something clash the ruddie then it is falconine. If something braille the annetta and it is springless then it braille the ruddie. If something is falconine and springless then it braille the ruddie. The annetta is springless.", "logic": "\nClash(ruddie, annetta)\nMyelinated(ruddie)\nFalconine(ruddie)\nSabbatical(ruddie)\nPremature(ruddie)\nBraille(ruddie, annetta)\nCastle(ruddie, annetta)\nClash(annetta, ruddie)\nFalconine(annetta)\nSabbatical(annetta)\nforall x (Braille(x, annetta) -> Castle(x, annetta))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and Castle(x, ruddie) -> Braille(x, annetta))\nforall x (Clash(x, ruddie) -> Springless(x))\nforall x (Springless(x) and Clash(x, ruddie) -> Braille(x, annetta))\nforall x (Clash(x, ruddie) -> Braille(ruddie, annetta))\nforall x (Clash(x, ruddie) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Braille(x, annetta) and Springless(x) -> Braille(x, ruddie))\nforall x (Falconine(x) and Springless(x) -> Braille(x, ruddie))\n\nSpringless(annetta)\n\nClash(annetta, ruddie) and forall x (Clash(x, ruddie) -> Springless(x)) -> therefore Springless(annetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The maible growl the eadie. The maible is movable. The maible is unhurt. The maible is inventive. The maible is like. The maible lapidify the eadie. The maible prioritise the eadie. The eadie growl the maible. The eadie is unhurt. The eadie is inventive. If something lapidify the eadie then it prioritise the eadie. If something is movable and it prioritise the maible then it lapidify the eadie. If something growl the maible then it is churlish. If something is churlish and it growl the maible then it lapidify the eadie. If something growl the maible then the maible lapidify the eadie. If something growl the maible then it is unhurt. If something lapidify the eadie and it is churlish then it lapidify the maible. If something is unhurt and churlish then it lapidify the maible. The eadie is not churlish.", "logic": "\nGrowl(maible, eadie)\nMovable(maible)\nUnhurt(maible)\nInventive(maible)\nLike(maible)\nLapidify(maible, eadie)\nPrioritise(maible, eadie)\nGrowl(eadie, maible)\nUnhurt(eadie)\nInventive(eadie)\nforall x (Lapidify(x, eadie) -> Prioritise(x, eadie))\nforall x (Movable(x) and Prioritise(x, maible) -> Lapidify(x, eadie))\nforall x (Growl(x, maible) -> Churlish(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) and Growl(x, maible) -> Lapidify(x, eadie))\nforall x (Growl(x, maible) -> Lapidify(maible, eadie))\nforall x (Growl(x, maible) -> Unhurt(x))\nforall x (Lapidify(x, eadie) and Churlish(x) -> Lapidify(x, maible))\nforall x (Unhurt(x) and Churlish(x) -> Lapidify(x, maible))\n\nnot Churlish(eadie)\n\nGrowl(eadie, maible) and forall x (Growl(x, maible) -> Churlish(x)) -> therefore Churlish(eadie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The gallagher sniffle the shannen. The gallagher is bifoliate. The gallagher is binding. The gallagher is affable. The gallagher is airborne. The gallagher harness the shannen. The gallagher limit the shannen. The shannen sniffle the gallagher. The shannen is binding. The shannen is affable. If something harness the shannen then it limit the shannen. If something is bifoliate and it limit the gallagher then it harness the shannen. If something sniffle the gallagher then it is mortifying. If something is mortifying and it sniffle the gallagher then it harness the shannen. If something sniffle the gallagher then the gallagher harness the shannen. If something sniffle the gallagher then it is binding. If something harness the shannen and it is mortifying then it harness the gallagher. If something is binding and mortifying then it harness the gallagher. The shannen harness the gallagher.", "logic": "\nSniffle(gallagher, shannen)\nBifoliate(gallagher)\nBinding(gallagher)\nAffable(gallagher)\nAirborne(gallagher)\nHarness(gallagher, shannen)\nLimit(gallagher, shannen)\nSniffle(shannen, gallagher)\nBinding(shannen)\nAffable(shannen)\nforall x (Harness(x, shannen) -> Limit(x, shannen))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) and Limit(x, gallagher) -> Harness(x, shannen))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, gallagher) -> Mortifying(x))\nforall x (Mortifying(x) and Sniffle(x, gallagher) -> Harness(x, shannen))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, gallagher) -> Harness(gallagher, shannen))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, gallagher) -> Binding(x))\nforall x (Harness(x, shannen) and Mortifying(x) -> Harness(x, gallagher))\nforall x (Binding(x) and Mortifying(x) -> Harness(x, gallagher))\n\nHarness(shannen, gallagher)\n\nSniffle(shannen, gallagher) and forall x (Sniffle(x, gallagher) -> Mortifying(x)) -> therefore Mortifying(shannen) Binding(shannen) and Mortifying(shannen) and forall x (Binding(x) and Mortifying(x) -> Harness(x, gallagher)) -> therefore Harness(shannen, gallagher)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The cherrita farce the errol. The cherrita is twopenny. The cherrita is froward. The cherrita is gumptious. The cherrita is imperious. The cherrita blow the errol. The cherrita scowl the errol. The errol farce the cherrita. The errol is froward. The errol is gumptious. If something blow the errol then it scowl the errol. If something is twopenny and it scowl the cherrita then it blow the errol. If something farce the cherrita then it is fijian. If something is fijian and it farce the cherrita then it blow the errol. If something farce the cherrita then the cherrita blow the errol. If something farce the cherrita then it is froward. If something blow the errol and it is fijian then it blow the cherrita. If something is froward and fijian then it blow the cherrita. The errol does not like the cherrita.", "logic": "\nFarce(cherrita, errol)\nTwopenny(cherrita)\nFroward(cherrita)\nGumptious(cherrita)\nImperious(cherrita)\nBlow(cherrita, errol)\nScowl(cherrita, errol)\nFarce(errol, cherrita)\nFroward(errol)\nGumptious(errol)\nforall x (Blow(x, errol) -> Scowl(x, errol))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Scowl(x, cherrita) -> Blow(x, errol))\nforall x (Farce(x, cherrita) -> Fijian(x))\nforall x (Fijian(x) and Farce(x, cherrita) -> Blow(x, errol))\nforall x (Farce(x, cherrita) -> Blow(cherrita, errol))\nforall x (Farce(x, cherrita) -> Froward(x))\nforall x (Blow(x, errol) and Fijian(x) -> Blow(x, cherrita))\nforall x (Froward(x) and Fijian(x) -> Blow(x, cherrita))\n\nnot Blow(errol, cherrita)\n\nFarce(errol, cherrita) and forall x (Farce(x, cherrita) -> Fijian(x)) -> therefore Fijian(errol) Froward(errol) and Fijian(errol) and forall x (Froward(x) and Fijian(x) -> Blow(x, cherrita)) -> therefore Blow(errol, cherrita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The sanford vomit the raul. The sanford is eminent. The sanford is weary. The sanford is savorless. The sanford is bigamous. The sanford clout the raul. The sanford lube the raul. The raul vomit the sanford. The raul is weary. The raul is savorless. If something clout the raul then it lube the raul. If something is eminent and it lube the sanford then it clout the raul. If something vomit the sanford then it is benumbed. If something is benumbed and it vomit the sanford then it clout the raul. If something vomit the sanford then the sanford clout the raul. If something vomit the sanford then it is weary. If something clout the raul and it is benumbed then it clout the sanford. If something is weary and benumbed then it clout the sanford. The raul lube the raul.", "logic": "\nVomit(sanford, raul)\nEminent(sanford)\nWeary(sanford)\nSavorless(sanford)\nBigamous(sanford)\nClout(sanford, raul)\nLube(sanford, raul)\nVomit(raul, sanford)\nWeary(raul)\nSavorless(raul)\nforall x (Clout(x, raul) -> Lube(x, raul))\nforall x (Eminent(x) and Lube(x, sanford) -> Clout(x, raul))\nforall x (Vomit(x, sanford) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Benumbed(x) and Vomit(x, sanford) -> Clout(x, raul))\nforall x (Vomit(x, sanford) -> Clout(sanford, raul))\nforall x (Vomit(x, sanford) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Clout(x, raul) and Benumbed(x) -> Clout(x, sanford))\nforall x (Weary(x) and Benumbed(x) -> Clout(x, sanford))\n\nLube(raul, raul)\n\nVomit(raul, sanford) and forall x (Vomit(x, sanford) -> Benumbed(x)) -> therefore Benumbed(raul) Benumbed(raul) and Vomit(raul, sanford) and forall x (Benumbed(x) and Vomit(x, sanford) -> Clout(x, raul)) -> therefore Clout(raul, raul) Clout(raul, raul) and forall x (Clout(x, raul) -> Lube(x, raul)) -> therefore Lube(raul, raul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The doro mumble the morganica. The doro is subclavian. The doro is economic. The doro is tegular. The doro is umteen. The doro pioneer the morganica. The doro jostle the morganica. The morganica mumble the doro. The morganica is economic. The morganica is tegular. If something pioneer the morganica then it jostle the morganica. If something is subclavian and it jostle the doro then it pioneer the morganica. If something mumble the doro then it is caducean. If something is caducean and it mumble the doro then it pioneer the morganica. If something mumble the doro then the doro pioneer the morganica. If something mumble the doro then it is economic. If something pioneer the morganica and it is caducean then it pioneer the doro. If something is economic and caducean then it pioneer the doro. The morganica does not need the morganica.", "logic": "\nMumble(doro, morganica)\nSubclavian(doro)\nEconomic(doro)\nTegular(doro)\nUmteen(doro)\nPioneer(doro, morganica)\nJostle(doro, morganica)\nMumble(morganica, doro)\nEconomic(morganica)\nTegular(morganica)\nforall x (Pioneer(x, morganica) -> Jostle(x, morganica))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) and Jostle(x, doro) -> Pioneer(x, morganica))\nforall x (Mumble(x, doro) -> Caducean(x))\nforall x (Caducean(x) and Mumble(x, doro) -> Pioneer(x, morganica))\nforall x (Mumble(x, doro) -> Pioneer(doro, morganica))\nforall x (Mumble(x, doro) -> Economic(x))\nforall x (Pioneer(x, morganica) and Caducean(x) -> Pioneer(x, doro))\nforall x (Economic(x) and Caducean(x) -> Pioneer(x, doro))\n\nnot Jostle(morganica, morganica)\n\nMumble(morganica, doro) and forall x (Mumble(x, doro) -> Caducean(x)) -> therefore Caducean(morganica) Caducean(morganica) and Mumble(morganica, doro) and forall x (Caducean(x) and Mumble(x, doro) -> Pioneer(x, morganica)) -> therefore Pioneer(morganica, morganica) Pioneer(morganica, morganica) and forall x (Pioneer(x, morganica) -> Jostle(x, morganica)) -> therefore Jostle(morganica, morganica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The anabelle ruminate the lucio. The anabelle is layered. The anabelle is nerveless. The anabelle is plotted. The anabelle is unfattened. The anabelle vivisect the lucio. The anabelle herald the lucio. The lucio ruminate the anabelle. The lucio is nerveless. The lucio is plotted. If something vivisect the lucio then it herald the lucio. If something is layered and it herald the anabelle then it vivisect the lucio. If something ruminate the anabelle then it is nontaxable. If something is nontaxable and it ruminate the anabelle then it vivisect the lucio. If something ruminate the anabelle then the anabelle vivisect the lucio. If something ruminate the anabelle then it is nerveless. If something vivisect the lucio and it is nontaxable then it vivisect the anabelle. If something is nerveless and nontaxable then it vivisect the anabelle. The anabelle does not like the anabelle.", "logic": "\nRuminate(anabelle, lucio)\nLayered(anabelle)\nNerveless(anabelle)\nPlotted(anabelle)\nUnfattened(anabelle)\nVivisect(anabelle, lucio)\nHerald(anabelle, lucio)\nRuminate(lucio, anabelle)\nNerveless(lucio)\nPlotted(lucio)\nforall x (Vivisect(x, lucio) -> Herald(x, lucio))\nforall x (Layered(x) and Herald(x, anabelle) -> Vivisect(x, lucio))\nforall x (Ruminate(x, anabelle) -> Nontaxable(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and Ruminate(x, anabelle) -> Vivisect(x, lucio))\nforall x (Ruminate(x, anabelle) -> Vivisect(anabelle, lucio))\nforall x (Ruminate(x, anabelle) -> Nerveless(x))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, lucio) and Nontaxable(x) -> Vivisect(x, anabelle))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and Nontaxable(x) -> Vivisect(x, anabelle))\n\nnot Vivisect(anabelle, anabelle)\n\nforall x (Vivisect(x, lucio) and Nontaxable(x) -> Vivisect(x, anabelle)) <- forall x (Ruminate(x, anabelle) -> Nontaxable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The bonni inveigle the missy. The bonni is riant. The bonni is distaff. The bonni is velvet. The bonni is timely. The bonni confide the missy. The bonni compensate the missy. The missy inveigle the bonni. The missy is distaff. The missy is velvet. If something confide the missy then it compensate the missy. If something is riant and it compensate the bonni then it confide the missy. If something inveigle the bonni then it is chancy. If something is chancy and it inveigle the bonni then it confide the missy. If something inveigle the bonni then the bonni confide the missy. If something inveigle the bonni then it is distaff. If something confide the missy and it is chancy then it confide the bonni. If something is distaff and chancy then it confide the bonni. The bonni is chancy.", "logic": "\nInveigle(bonni, missy)\nRiant(bonni)\nDistaff(bonni)\nVelvet(bonni)\nTimely(bonni)\nConfide(bonni, missy)\nCompensate(bonni, missy)\nInveigle(missy, bonni)\nDistaff(missy)\nVelvet(missy)\nforall x (Confide(x, missy) -> Compensate(x, missy))\nforall x (Riant(x) and Compensate(x, bonni) -> Confide(x, missy))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, bonni) -> Chancy(x))\nforall x (Chancy(x) and Inveigle(x, bonni) -> Confide(x, missy))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, bonni) -> Confide(bonni, missy))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, bonni) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Confide(x, missy) and Chancy(x) -> Confide(x, bonni))\nforall x (Distaff(x) and Chancy(x) -> Confide(x, bonni))\n\nChancy(bonni)\n\nforall x (Inveigle(x, bonni) -> Chancy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The rogers feast the mordecai. The rogers is inviolate. The rogers is flaccid. The rogers is hoydenish. The rogers is mutable. The rogers cross the mordecai. The rogers bolshevize the mordecai. The mordecai feast the rogers. The mordecai is flaccid. The mordecai is hoydenish. If something cross the mordecai then it bolshevize the mordecai. If something is inviolate and it bolshevize the rogers then it cross the mordecai. If something feast the rogers then it is vaulting. If something is vaulting and it feast the rogers then it cross the mordecai. If something feast the rogers then the rogers cross the mordecai. If something feast the rogers then it is flaccid. If something cross the mordecai and it is vaulting then it cross the rogers. If something is flaccid and vaulting then it cross the rogers. The rogers does not eat the rogers.", "logic": "\nFeast(rogers, mordecai)\nInviolate(rogers)\nFlaccid(rogers)\nHoydenish(rogers)\nMutable(rogers)\nCross(rogers, mordecai)\nBolshevize(rogers, mordecai)\nFeast(mordecai, rogers)\nFlaccid(mordecai)\nHoydenish(mordecai)\nforall x (Cross(x, mordecai) -> Bolshevize(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) and Bolshevize(x, rogers) -> Cross(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Feast(x, rogers) -> Vaulting(x))\nforall x (Vaulting(x) and Feast(x, rogers) -> Cross(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Feast(x, rogers) -> Cross(rogers, mordecai))\nforall x (Feast(x, rogers) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Cross(x, mordecai) and Vaulting(x) -> Cross(x, rogers))\nforall x (Flaccid(x) and Vaulting(x) -> Cross(x, rogers))\n\nnot Feast(rogers, rogers)\n\nnot Feast(rogers, rogers) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The spud smell the layney. The spud is amygdaloid. The spud is ponderable. The spud is shelflike. The spud is yemeni. The spud apologise the layney. The spud rejoice the layney. The layney smell the spud. The layney is ponderable. The layney is shelflike. If something apologise the layney then it rejoice the layney. If something is amygdaloid and it rejoice the spud then it apologise the layney. If something smell the spud then it is villainous. If something is villainous and it smell the spud then it apologise the layney. If something smell the spud then the spud apologise the layney. If something smell the spud then it is ponderable. If something apologise the layney and it is villainous then it apologise the spud. If something is ponderable and villainous then it apologise the spud. The layney is amygdaloid.", "logic": "\nSmell(spud, layney)\nAmygdaloid(spud)\nPonderable(spud)\nShelflike(spud)\nYemeni(spud)\nApologise(spud, layney)\nRejoice(spud, layney)\nSmell(layney, spud)\nPonderable(layney)\nShelflike(layney)\nforall x (Apologise(x, layney) -> Rejoice(x, layney))\nforall x (Amygdaloid(x) and Rejoice(x, spud) -> Apologise(x, layney))\nforall x (Smell(x, spud) -> Villainous(x))\nforall x (Villainous(x) and Smell(x, spud) -> Apologise(x, layney))\nforall x (Smell(x, spud) -> Apologise(spud, layney))\nforall x (Smell(x, spud) -> Ponderable(x))\nforall x (Apologise(x, layney) and Villainous(x) -> Apologise(x, spud))\nforall x (Ponderable(x) and Villainous(x) -> Apologise(x, spud))\n\nAmygdaloid(layney)\n\nAmygdaloid(layney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The anita swat the shurwood. The anita is definitive. The anita is sanitised. The anita is lowset. The anita is pasteurian. The anita disco the shurwood. The anita convict the shurwood. The shurwood swat the anita. The shurwood is sanitised. The shurwood is lowset. If something disco the shurwood then it convict the shurwood. If something is definitive and it convict the anita then it disco the shurwood. If something swat the anita then it is unwished. If something is unwished and it swat the anita then it disco the shurwood. If something swat the anita then the anita disco the shurwood. If something swat the anita then it is sanitised. If something disco the shurwood and it is unwished then it disco the anita. If something is sanitised and unwished then it disco the anita. The shurwood does not eat the shurwood.", "logic": "\nSwat(anita, shurwood)\nDefinitive(anita)\nSanitised(anita)\nLowset(anita)\nPasteurian(anita)\nDisco(anita, shurwood)\nConvict(anita, shurwood)\nSwat(shurwood, anita)\nSanitised(shurwood)\nLowset(shurwood)\nforall x (Disco(x, shurwood) -> Convict(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Definitive(x) and Convict(x, anita) -> Disco(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Swat(x, anita) -> Unwished(x))\nforall x (Unwished(x) and Swat(x, anita) -> Disco(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Swat(x, anita) -> Disco(anita, shurwood))\nforall x (Swat(x, anita) -> Sanitised(x))\nforall x (Disco(x, shurwood) and Unwished(x) -> Disco(x, anita))\nforall x (Sanitised(x) and Unwished(x) -> Disco(x, anita))\n\nnot Swat(shurwood, shurwood)\n\nnot Swat(shurwood, shurwood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The sig discredit the huey. The sig is portentous. The sig is ovate. The sig is masterly. The sig is squashy. The sig harry the huey. The sig toast the huey. The huey discredit the sig. The huey is ovate. The huey is masterly. If something harry the huey then it toast the huey. If something is portentous and it toast the sig then it harry the huey. If something discredit the sig then it is worrying. If something is worrying and it discredit the sig then it harry the huey. If something discredit the sig then the sig harry the huey. If something discredit the sig then it is ovate. If something harry the huey and it is worrying then it harry the sig. If something is ovate and worrying then it harry the sig. The huey toast the sig.", "logic": "\nDiscredit(sig, huey)\nPortentous(sig)\nOvate(sig)\nMasterly(sig)\nSquashy(sig)\nHarry(sig, huey)\nToast(sig, huey)\nDiscredit(huey, sig)\nOvate(huey)\nMasterly(huey)\nforall x (Harry(x, huey) -> Toast(x, huey))\nforall x (Portentous(x) and Toast(x, sig) -> Harry(x, huey))\nforall x (Discredit(x, sig) -> Worrying(x))\nforall x (Worrying(x) and Discredit(x, sig) -> Harry(x, huey))\nforall x (Discredit(x, sig) -> Harry(sig, huey))\nforall x (Discredit(x, sig) -> Ovate(x))\nforall x (Harry(x, huey) and Worrying(x) -> Harry(x, sig))\nforall x (Ovate(x) and Worrying(x) -> Harry(x, sig))\n\nToast(huey, sig)\n\nToast(huey, sig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The starla pickle the arvin. The starla is flagitious. The starla is tumid. The starla is bilgy. The starla is sickening. The starla blubber the arvin. The starla saber the arvin. The arvin pickle the starla. The arvin is tumid. The arvin is bilgy. If something blubber the arvin then it saber the arvin. If something is flagitious and it saber the starla then it blubber the arvin. If something pickle the starla then it is ambagious. If something is ambagious and it pickle the starla then it blubber the arvin. If something pickle the starla then the starla blubber the arvin. If something pickle the starla then it is tumid. If something blubber the arvin and it is ambagious then it blubber the starla. If something is tumid and ambagious then it blubber the starla. The starla does not need the starla.", "logic": "\nPickle(starla, arvin)\nFlagitious(starla)\nTumid(starla)\nBilgy(starla)\nSickening(starla)\nBlubber(starla, arvin)\nSaber(starla, arvin)\nPickle(arvin, starla)\nTumid(arvin)\nBilgy(arvin)\nforall x (Blubber(x, arvin) -> Saber(x, arvin))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) and Saber(x, starla) -> Blubber(x, arvin))\nforall x (Pickle(x, starla) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) and Pickle(x, starla) -> Blubber(x, arvin))\nforall x (Pickle(x, starla) -> Blubber(starla, arvin))\nforall x (Pickle(x, starla) -> Tumid(x))\nforall x (Blubber(x, arvin) and Ambagious(x) -> Blubber(x, starla))\nforall x (Tumid(x) and Ambagious(x) -> Blubber(x, starla))\n\nnot Saber(starla, starla)\n\nnot Saber(starla, starla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The melanie suggest the kylen. The melanie is weaned. The melanie is demulcent. The melanie is orwellian. The melanie is arresting. The melanie carol the kylen. The melanie rhumba the kylen. The kylen suggest the melanie. The kylen is demulcent. The kylen is orwellian. If something carol the kylen then it rhumba the kylen. If something is weaned and it rhumba the melanie then it carol the kylen. If something suggest the melanie then it is likely. If something is likely and it suggest the melanie then it carol the kylen. If something suggest the melanie then the melanie carol the kylen. If something suggest the melanie then it is demulcent. If something carol the kylen and it is likely then it carol the melanie. If something is demulcent and likely then it carol the melanie. The kylen is arresting.", "logic": "\nSuggest(melanie, kylen)\nWeaned(melanie)\nDemulcent(melanie)\nOrwellian(melanie)\nArresting(melanie)\nCarol(melanie, kylen)\nRhumba(melanie, kylen)\nSuggest(kylen, melanie)\nDemulcent(kylen)\nOrwellian(kylen)\nforall x (Carol(x, kylen) -> Rhumba(x, kylen))\nforall x (Weaned(x) and Rhumba(x, melanie) -> Carol(x, kylen))\nforall x (Suggest(x, melanie) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) and Suggest(x, melanie) -> Carol(x, kylen))\nforall x (Suggest(x, melanie) -> Carol(melanie, kylen))\nforall x (Suggest(x, melanie) -> Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Carol(x, kylen) and Likely(x) -> Carol(x, melanie))\nforall x (Demulcent(x) and Likely(x) -> Carol(x, melanie))\n\nArresting(kylen)\n\nArresting(kylen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The laverne is smitten. The laverne is moroccan. The laverne limn the cecile. The laverne stave the cecile. The laverne skulk the cecile. The cecile is viii. The cecile is smitten. The cecile is supportive. The cecile is moroccan. The cecile limn the laverne. The cecile stave the laverne. The cecile skulk the laverne. If something skulk the laverne then the laverne limn the cecile. If something skulk the cecile then it is admired. If something is moroccan then it limn the cecile. If something stave the cecile and the cecile stave the laverne then the laverne is viii. If something limn the cecile then it skulk the cecile. If the laverne stave the cecile then the cecile limn the laverne. The laverne limn the cecile.", "logic": "\nSmitten(laverne)\nMoroccan(laverne)\nLimn(laverne, cecile)\nStave(laverne, cecile)\nSkulk(laverne, cecile)\nViii(cecile)\nSmitten(cecile)\nSupportive(cecile)\nMoroccan(cecile)\nLimn(cecile, laverne)\nStave(cecile, laverne)\nSkulk(cecile, laverne)\nforall x (Skulk(x, laverne) -> Limn(laverne, cecile))\nforall x (Skulk(x, cecile) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Limn(x, cecile))\nforall x (Stave(x, cecile) and Stave(cecile, laverne) -> Viii(laverne))\nforall x (Limn(x, cecile) -> Skulk(x, cecile))\nStave(laverne, cecile) -> Limn(cecile, laverne)\n\nLimn(laverne, cecile)\n\ntherefore Limn(laverne, cecile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The valery is converted. The valery is analog. The valery theologize the nomi. The valery scoff the nomi. The valery grace the nomi. The nomi is squiffy. The nomi is converted. The nomi is cloudy. The nomi is analog. The nomi theologize the valery. The nomi scoff the valery. The nomi grace the valery. If something grace the valery then the valery theologize the nomi. If something grace the nomi then it is plastered. If something is analog then it theologize the nomi. If something scoff the nomi and the nomi scoff the valery then the valery is squiffy. If something theologize the nomi then it grace the nomi. If the valery scoff the nomi then the nomi theologize the valery. The valery is not analog.", "logic": "\nConverted(valery)\nAnalog(valery)\nTheologize(valery, nomi)\nScoff(valery, nomi)\nGrace(valery, nomi)\nSquiffy(nomi)\nConverted(nomi)\nCloudy(nomi)\nAnalog(nomi)\nTheologize(nomi, valery)\nScoff(nomi, valery)\nGrace(nomi, valery)\nforall x (Grace(x, valery) -> Theologize(valery, nomi))\nforall x (Grace(x, nomi) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Analog(x) -> Theologize(x, nomi))\nforall x (Scoff(x, nomi) and Scoff(nomi, valery) -> Squiffy(valery))\nforall x (Theologize(x, nomi) -> Grace(x, nomi))\nScoff(valery, nomi) -> Theologize(nomi, valery)\n\nnot Analog(valery)\n\ntherefore Analog(valery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The osbourne is rhetorical. The osbourne is manifold. The osbourne port the elisabeth. The osbourne anger the elisabeth. The osbourne freckle the elisabeth. The elisabeth is compact. The elisabeth is rhetorical. The elisabeth is amidship. The elisabeth is manifold. The elisabeth port the osbourne. The elisabeth anger the osbourne. The elisabeth freckle the osbourne. If something freckle the osbourne then the osbourne port the elisabeth. If something freckle the elisabeth then it is quilted. If something is manifold then it port the elisabeth. If something anger the elisabeth and the elisabeth anger the osbourne then the osbourne is compact. If something port the elisabeth then it freckle the elisabeth. If the osbourne anger the elisabeth then the elisabeth port the osbourne. The osbourne is quilted.", "logic": "\nRhetorical(osbourne)\nManifold(osbourne)\nPort(osbourne, elisabeth)\nAnger(osbourne, elisabeth)\nFreckle(osbourne, elisabeth)\nCompact(elisabeth)\nRhetorical(elisabeth)\nAmidship(elisabeth)\nManifold(elisabeth)\nPort(elisabeth, osbourne)\nAnger(elisabeth, osbourne)\nFreckle(elisabeth, osbourne)\nforall x (Freckle(x, osbourne) -> Port(osbourne, elisabeth))\nforall x (Freckle(x, elisabeth) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Manifold(x) -> Port(x, elisabeth))\nforall x (Anger(x, elisabeth) and Anger(elisabeth, osbourne) -> Compact(osbourne))\nforall x (Port(x, elisabeth) -> Freckle(x, elisabeth))\nAnger(osbourne, elisabeth) -> Port(elisabeth, osbourne)\n\nQuilted(osbourne)\n\nFreckle(osbourne, elisabeth) and forall x (Freckle(x, elisabeth) -> Quilted(x)) -> therefore Quilted(osbourne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The netta is epidemic. The netta is ectodermic. The netta conceal the stevie. The netta disarray the stevie. The netta customise the stevie. The stevie is receivable. The stevie is epidemic. The stevie is determined. The stevie is ectodermic. The stevie conceal the netta. The stevie disarray the netta. The stevie customise the netta. If something customise the netta then the netta conceal the stevie. If something customise the stevie then it is besieged. If something is ectodermic then it conceal the stevie. If something disarray the stevie and the stevie disarray the netta then the netta is receivable. If something conceal the stevie then it customise the stevie. If the netta disarray the stevie then the stevie conceal the netta. The netta is not receivable.", "logic": "\nEpidemic(netta)\nEctodermic(netta)\nConceal(netta, stevie)\nDisarray(netta, stevie)\nCustomise(netta, stevie)\nReceivable(stevie)\nEpidemic(stevie)\nDetermined(stevie)\nEctodermic(stevie)\nConceal(stevie, netta)\nDisarray(stevie, netta)\nCustomise(stevie, netta)\nforall x (Customise(x, netta) -> Conceal(netta, stevie))\nforall x (Customise(x, stevie) -> Besieged(x))\nforall x (Ectodermic(x) -> Conceal(x, stevie))\nforall x (Disarray(x, stevie) and Disarray(stevie, netta) -> Receivable(netta))\nforall x (Conceal(x, stevie) -> Customise(x, stevie))\nDisarray(netta, stevie) -> Conceal(stevie, netta)\n\nnot Receivable(netta)\n\nDisarray(netta, stevie) and Disarray(stevie, netta) and forall x (Disarray(x, stevie) and Disarray(stevie, netta) -> Receivable(netta)) -> therefore Receivable(netta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The sissy is spiffing. The sissy is permeating. The sissy notify the arline. The sissy regenerate the arline. The sissy quibble the arline. The arline is invariable. The arline is spiffing. The arline is marbled. The arline is permeating. The arline notify the sissy. The arline regenerate the sissy. The arline quibble the sissy. If something quibble the sissy then the sissy notify the arline. If something quibble the arline then it is pomaded. If something is permeating then it notify the arline. If something regenerate the arline and the arline regenerate the sissy then the sissy is invariable. If something notify the arline then it quibble the arline. If the sissy regenerate the arline then the arline notify the sissy. The arline quibble the arline.", "logic": "\nSpiffing(sissy)\nPermeating(sissy)\nNotify(sissy, arline)\nRegenerate(sissy, arline)\nQuibble(sissy, arline)\nInvariable(arline)\nSpiffing(arline)\nMarbled(arline)\nPermeating(arline)\nNotify(arline, sissy)\nRegenerate(arline, sissy)\nQuibble(arline, sissy)\nforall x (Quibble(x, sissy) -> Notify(sissy, arline))\nforall x (Quibble(x, arline) -> Pomaded(x))\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Notify(x, arline))\nforall x (Regenerate(x, arline) and Regenerate(arline, sissy) -> Invariable(sissy))\nforall x (Notify(x, arline) -> Quibble(x, arline))\nRegenerate(sissy, arline) -> Notify(arline, sissy)\n\nQuibble(arline, arline)\n\nPermeating(arline) and forall x (Permeating(x) -> Notify(x, arline)) -> therefore Notify(arline, arline) Notify(arline, arline) and forall x (Notify(x, arline) -> Quibble(x, arline)) -> therefore Quibble(arline, arline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The rabi is polyglot. The rabi is dusty. The rabi slabber the allegra. The rabi cramp the allegra. The rabi unwrap the allegra. The allegra is noncyclic. The allegra is polyglot. The allegra is wild. The allegra is dusty. The allegra slabber the rabi. The allegra cramp the rabi. The allegra unwrap the rabi. If something unwrap the rabi then the rabi slabber the allegra. If something unwrap the allegra then it is ministrant. If something is dusty then it slabber the allegra. If something cramp the allegra and the allegra cramp the rabi then the rabi is noncyclic. If something slabber the allegra then it unwrap the allegra. If the rabi cramp the allegra then the allegra slabber the rabi. The allegra does not visit the allegra.", "logic": "\nPolyglot(rabi)\nDusty(rabi)\nSlabber(rabi, allegra)\nCramp(rabi, allegra)\nUnwrap(rabi, allegra)\nNoncyclic(allegra)\nPolyglot(allegra)\nWild(allegra)\nDusty(allegra)\nSlabber(allegra, rabi)\nCramp(allegra, rabi)\nUnwrap(allegra, rabi)\nforall x (Unwrap(x, rabi) -> Slabber(rabi, allegra))\nforall x (Unwrap(x, allegra) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Dusty(x) -> Slabber(x, allegra))\nforall x (Cramp(x, allegra) and Cramp(allegra, rabi) -> Noncyclic(rabi))\nforall x (Slabber(x, allegra) -> Unwrap(x, allegra))\nCramp(rabi, allegra) -> Slabber(allegra, rabi)\n\nnot Unwrap(allegra, allegra)\n\nDusty(allegra) and forall x (Dusty(x) -> Slabber(x, allegra)) -> therefore Slabber(allegra, allegra) Slabber(allegra, allegra) and forall x (Slabber(x, allegra) -> Unwrap(x, allegra)) -> therefore Unwrap(allegra, allegra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The shaine is twenty. The shaine is codified. The shaine revise the idalina. The shaine scarper the idalina. The shaine ready the idalina. The idalina is forfeited. The idalina is twenty. The idalina is endogamic. The idalina is codified. The idalina revise the shaine. The idalina scarper the shaine. The idalina ready the shaine. If something ready the shaine then the shaine revise the idalina. If something ready the idalina then it is graven. If something is codified then it revise the idalina. If something scarper the idalina and the idalina scarper the shaine then the shaine is forfeited. If something revise the idalina then it ready the idalina. If the shaine scarper the idalina then the idalina revise the shaine. The idalina is graven.", "logic": "\nTwenty(shaine)\nCodified(shaine)\nRevise(shaine, idalina)\nScarper(shaine, idalina)\nReady(shaine, idalina)\nForfeited(idalina)\nTwenty(idalina)\nEndogamic(idalina)\nCodified(idalina)\nRevise(idalina, shaine)\nScarper(idalina, shaine)\nReady(idalina, shaine)\nforall x (Ready(x, shaine) -> Revise(shaine, idalina))\nforall x (Ready(x, idalina) -> Graven(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Revise(x, idalina))\nforall x (Scarper(x, idalina) and Scarper(idalina, shaine) -> Forfeited(shaine))\nforall x (Revise(x, idalina) -> Ready(x, idalina))\nScarper(shaine, idalina) -> Revise(idalina, shaine)\n\nGraven(idalina)\n\nCodified(idalina) and forall x (Codified(x) -> Revise(x, idalina)) -> therefore Revise(idalina, idalina) Revise(idalina, idalina) and forall x (Revise(x, idalina) -> Ready(x, idalina)) -> therefore Ready(idalina, idalina) Ready(idalina, idalina) and forall x (Ready(x, idalina) -> Graven(x)) -> therefore Graven(idalina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The monte is geodesical. The monte is hushed. The monte moon the scarlett. The monte bravo the scarlett. The monte dispossess the scarlett. The scarlett is tongued. The scarlett is geodesical. The scarlett is wobbling. The scarlett is hushed. The scarlett moon the monte. The scarlett bravo the monte. The scarlett dispossess the monte. If something dispossess the monte then the monte moon the scarlett. If something dispossess the scarlett then it is uncurled. If something is hushed then it moon the scarlett. If something bravo the scarlett and the scarlett bravo the monte then the monte is tongued. If something moon the scarlett then it dispossess the scarlett. If the monte bravo the scarlett then the scarlett moon the monte. The scarlett is not uncurled.", "logic": "\nGeodesical(monte)\nHushed(monte)\nMoon(monte, scarlett)\nBravo(monte, scarlett)\nDispossess(monte, scarlett)\nTongued(scarlett)\nGeodesical(scarlett)\nWobbling(scarlett)\nHushed(scarlett)\nMoon(scarlett, monte)\nBravo(scarlett, monte)\nDispossess(scarlett, monte)\nforall x (Dispossess(x, monte) -> Moon(monte, scarlett))\nforall x (Dispossess(x, scarlett) -> Uncurled(x))\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Moon(x, scarlett))\nforall x (Bravo(x, scarlett) and Bravo(scarlett, monte) -> Tongued(monte))\nforall x (Moon(x, scarlett) -> Dispossess(x, scarlett))\nBravo(monte, scarlett) -> Moon(scarlett, monte)\n\nnot Uncurled(scarlett)\n\nHushed(scarlett) and forall x (Hushed(x) -> Moon(x, scarlett)) -> therefore Moon(scarlett, scarlett) Moon(scarlett, scarlett) and forall x (Moon(x, scarlett) -> Dispossess(x, scarlett)) -> therefore Dispossess(scarlett, scarlett) Dispossess(scarlett, scarlett) and forall x (Dispossess(x, scarlett) -> Uncurled(x)) -> therefore Uncurled(scarlett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The isis is xxiii. The isis is skimpy. The isis receive the petey. The isis drawl the petey. The isis trip the petey. The petey is bullish. The petey is xxiii. The petey is sclerosed. The petey is skimpy. The petey receive the isis. The petey drawl the isis. The petey trip the isis. If something trip the isis then the isis receive the petey. If something trip the petey then it is retrograde. If something is skimpy then it receive the petey. If something drawl the petey and the petey drawl the isis then the isis is bullish. If something receive the petey then it trip the petey. If the isis drawl the petey then the petey receive the isis. The petey does not see the petey.", "logic": "\nXxiii(isis)\nSkimpy(isis)\nReceive(isis, petey)\nDrawl(isis, petey)\nTrip(isis, petey)\nBullish(petey)\nXxiii(petey)\nSclerosed(petey)\nSkimpy(petey)\nReceive(petey, isis)\nDrawl(petey, isis)\nTrip(petey, isis)\nforall x (Trip(x, isis) -> Receive(isis, petey))\nforall x (Trip(x, petey) -> Retrograde(x))\nforall x (Skimpy(x) -> Receive(x, petey))\nforall x (Drawl(x, petey) and Drawl(petey, isis) -> Bullish(isis))\nforall x (Receive(x, petey) -> Trip(x, petey))\nDrawl(isis, petey) -> Receive(petey, isis)\n\nnot Drawl(petey, petey)\n\nnot Drawl(petey, petey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The iago is realised. The iago is regimental. The iago dent the angus. The iago tumefy the angus. The iago deport the angus. The angus is saurian. The angus is realised. The angus is miraculous. The angus is regimental. The angus dent the iago. The angus tumefy the iago. The angus deport the iago. If something deport the iago then the iago dent the angus. If something deport the angus then it is wainscoted. If something is regimental then it dent the angus. If something tumefy the angus and the angus tumefy the iago then the iago is saurian. If something dent the angus then it deport the angus. If the iago tumefy the angus then the angus dent the iago. The iago dent the iago.", "logic": "\nRealised(iago)\nRegimental(iago)\nDent(iago, angus)\nTumefy(iago, angus)\nDeport(iago, angus)\nSaurian(angus)\nRealised(angus)\nMiraculous(angus)\nRegimental(angus)\nDent(angus, iago)\nTumefy(angus, iago)\nDeport(angus, iago)\nforall x (Deport(x, iago) -> Dent(iago, angus))\nforall x (Deport(x, angus) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) -> Dent(x, angus))\nforall x (Tumefy(x, angus) and Tumefy(angus, iago) -> Saurian(iago))\nforall x (Dent(x, angus) -> Deport(x, angus))\nTumefy(iago, angus) -> Dent(angus, iago)\n\nDent(iago, iago)\n\nDent(iago, iago) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The ophelia is nonaligned. The ophelia is prime. The ophelia lynch the hale. The ophelia upraise the hale. The ophelia nigrify the hale. The hale is devout. The hale is nonaligned. The hale is adored. The hale is prime. The hale lynch the ophelia. The hale upraise the ophelia. The hale nigrify the ophelia. If something nigrify the ophelia then the ophelia lynch the hale. If something nigrify the hale then it is sclerosed. If something is prime then it lynch the hale. If something upraise the hale and the hale upraise the ophelia then the ophelia is devout. If something lynch the hale then it nigrify the hale. If the ophelia upraise the hale then the hale lynch the ophelia. The ophelia is not adored.", "logic": "\nNonaligned(ophelia)\nPrime(ophelia)\nLynch(ophelia, hale)\nUpraise(ophelia, hale)\nNigrify(ophelia, hale)\nDevout(hale)\nNonaligned(hale)\nAdored(hale)\nPrime(hale)\nLynch(hale, ophelia)\nUpraise(hale, ophelia)\nNigrify(hale, ophelia)\nforall x (Nigrify(x, ophelia) -> Lynch(ophelia, hale))\nforall x (Nigrify(x, hale) -> Sclerosed(x))\nforall x (Prime(x) -> Lynch(x, hale))\nforall x (Upraise(x, hale) and Upraise(hale, ophelia) -> Devout(ophelia))\nforall x (Lynch(x, hale) -> Nigrify(x, hale))\nUpraise(ophelia, hale) -> Lynch(hale, ophelia)\n\nnot Adored(ophelia)\n\nnot Adored(ophelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The clarance is ninety. The clarance is slavic. The clarance crib the adlai. The clarance outperform the adlai. The clarance fowl the adlai. The adlai is sunstruck. The adlai is ninety. The adlai is past. The adlai is slavic. The adlai crib the clarance. The adlai outperform the clarance. The adlai fowl the clarance. If something fowl the clarance then the clarance crib the adlai. If something fowl the adlai then it is superb. If something is slavic then it crib the adlai. If something outperform the adlai and the adlai outperform the clarance then the clarance is sunstruck. If something crib the adlai then it fowl the adlai. If the clarance outperform the adlai then the adlai crib the clarance. The clarance fowl the clarance.", "logic": "\nNinety(clarance)\nSlavic(clarance)\nCrib(clarance, adlai)\nOutperform(clarance, adlai)\nFowl(clarance, adlai)\nSunstruck(adlai)\nNinety(adlai)\nPast(adlai)\nSlavic(adlai)\nCrib(adlai, clarance)\nOutperform(adlai, clarance)\nFowl(adlai, clarance)\nforall x (Fowl(x, clarance) -> Crib(clarance, adlai))\nforall x (Fowl(x, adlai) -> Superb(x))\nforall x (Slavic(x) -> Crib(x, adlai))\nforall x (Outperform(x, adlai) and Outperform(adlai, clarance) -> Sunstruck(clarance))\nforall x (Crib(x, adlai) -> Fowl(x, adlai))\nOutperform(clarance, adlai) -> Crib(adlai, clarance)\n\nFowl(clarance, clarance)\n\nFowl(clarance, clarance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The fergus inosculate the jackie. The fergus is arillate. The fergus torch the shurlock. The jackie inosculate the fergus. The jackie is glutinous. The giacomo is epicurean. The shurlock is peregrine. If something rive the fergus then the fergus rive the jackie. If something inosculate the fergus then the fergus is peregrine. If the jackie rive the giacomo then the jackie is peregrine. If something torch the fergus then it is glutinous. If the fergus torch the giacomo and the fergus rive the giacomo then the fergus rive the jackie. If something rive the fergus then the fergus is arillate. If the fergus is epicurean then the fergus rive the jackie. If something is peregrine then it is epicurean. The shurlock is peregrine.", "logic": "\nInosculate(fergus, jackie)\nArillate(fergus)\nTorch(fergus, shurlock)\nInosculate(jackie, fergus)\nGlutinous(jackie)\nEpicurean(giacomo)\nPeregrine(shurlock)\nforall x (Rive(x, fergus) -> Rive(fergus, jackie))\nforall x (Inosculate(x, fergus) -> Peregrine(fergus))\nRive(jackie, giacomo) -> Peregrine(jackie)\nforall x (Torch(x, fergus) -> Glutinous(x))\nTorch(fergus, giacomo) and Rive(fergus, giacomo) -> Rive(fergus, jackie)\nforall x (Rive(x, fergus) -> Arillate(fergus))\nEpicurean(fergus) -> Rive(fergus, jackie)\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Epicurean(x))\n\nPeregrine(shurlock)\n\ntherefore Peregrine(shurlock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The mable referee the kincaid. The mable is heliacal. The mable legitimise the emili. The kincaid referee the mable. The kincaid is otherwise. The julieta is vile. The emili is taillike. If something habituate the mable then the mable habituate the kincaid. If something referee the mable then the mable is taillike. If the kincaid habituate the julieta then the kincaid is taillike. If something legitimise the mable then it is otherwise. If the mable legitimise the julieta and the mable habituate the julieta then the mable habituate the kincaid. If something habituate the mable then the mable is heliacal. If the mable is vile then the mable habituate the kincaid. If something is taillike then it is vile. The mable does not visit the emili.", "logic": "\nReferee(mable, kincaid)\nHeliacal(mable)\nLegitimise(mable, emili)\nReferee(kincaid, mable)\nOtherwise(kincaid)\nVile(julieta)\nTaillike(emili)\nforall x (Habituate(x, mable) -> Habituate(mable, kincaid))\nforall x (Referee(x, mable) -> Taillike(mable))\nHabituate(kincaid, julieta) -> Taillike(kincaid)\nforall x (Legitimise(x, mable) -> Otherwise(x))\nLegitimise(mable, julieta) and Habituate(mable, julieta) -> Habituate(mable, kincaid)\nforall x (Habituate(x, mable) -> Heliacal(mable))\nVile(mable) -> Habituate(mable, kincaid)\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Vile(x))\n\nnot Legitimise(mable, emili)\n\ntherefore Legitimise(mable, emili)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The mimi display the denna. The mimi is rupicolous. The mimi prance the sile. The denna display the mimi. The denna is embezzled. The idalina is together. The sile is cancerous. If something leer the mimi then the mimi leer the denna. If something display the mimi then the mimi is cancerous. If the denna leer the idalina then the denna is cancerous. If something prance the mimi then it is embezzled. If the mimi prance the idalina and the mimi leer the idalina then the mimi leer the denna. If something leer the mimi then the mimi is rupicolous. If the mimi is together then the mimi leer the denna. If something is cancerous then it is together. The mimi is cancerous.", "logic": "\nDisplay(mimi, denna)\nRupicolous(mimi)\nPrance(mimi, sile)\nDisplay(denna, mimi)\nEmbezzled(denna)\nTogether(idalina)\nCancerous(sile)\nforall x (Leer(x, mimi) -> Leer(mimi, denna))\nforall x (Display(x, mimi) -> Cancerous(mimi))\nLeer(denna, idalina) -> Cancerous(denna)\nforall x (Prance(x, mimi) -> Embezzled(x))\nPrance(mimi, idalina) and Leer(mimi, idalina) -> Leer(mimi, denna)\nforall x (Leer(x, mimi) -> Rupicolous(mimi))\nTogether(mimi) -> Leer(mimi, denna)\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> Together(x))\n\nCancerous(mimi)\n\nDisplay(denna, mimi) and forall x (Display(x, mimi) -> Cancerous(mimi)) -> therefore Cancerous(mimi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The giorgi satellite the merla. The giorgi is sabine. The giorgi pullulate the dotti. The merla satellite the giorgi. The merla is concealing. The louisa is distracted. The dotti is tearaway. If something oppress the giorgi then the giorgi oppress the merla. If something satellite the giorgi then the giorgi is tearaway. If the merla oppress the louisa then the merla is tearaway. If something pullulate the giorgi then it is concealing. If the giorgi pullulate the louisa and the giorgi oppress the louisa then the giorgi oppress the merla. If something oppress the giorgi then the giorgi is sabine. If the giorgi is distracted then the giorgi oppress the merla. If something is tearaway then it is distracted. The giorgi is not tearaway.", "logic": "\nSatellite(giorgi, merla)\nSabine(giorgi)\nPullulate(giorgi, dotti)\nSatellite(merla, giorgi)\nConcealing(merla)\nDistracted(louisa)\nTearaway(dotti)\nforall x (Oppress(x, giorgi) -> Oppress(giorgi, merla))\nforall x (Satellite(x, giorgi) -> Tearaway(giorgi))\nOppress(merla, louisa) -> Tearaway(merla)\nforall x (Pullulate(x, giorgi) -> Concealing(x))\nPullulate(giorgi, louisa) and Oppress(giorgi, louisa) -> Oppress(giorgi, merla)\nforall x (Oppress(x, giorgi) -> Sabine(giorgi))\nDistracted(giorgi) -> Oppress(giorgi, merla)\nforall x (Tearaway(x) -> Distracted(x))\n\nnot Tearaway(giorgi)\n\nSatellite(merla, giorgi) and forall x (Satellite(x, giorgi) -> Tearaway(giorgi)) -> therefore Tearaway(giorgi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The wyndham straw the werner. The wyndham is sacculate. The wyndham porter the neville. The werner straw the wyndham. The werner is armenian. The opal is pedate. The neville is neurotic. If something chew the wyndham then the wyndham chew the werner. If something straw the wyndham then the wyndham is neurotic. If the werner chew the opal then the werner is neurotic. If something porter the wyndham then it is armenian. If the wyndham porter the opal and the wyndham chew the opal then the wyndham chew the werner. If something chew the wyndham then the wyndham is sacculate. If the wyndham is pedate then the wyndham chew the werner. If something is neurotic then it is pedate. The wyndham is pedate.", "logic": "\nStraw(wyndham, werner)\nSacculate(wyndham)\nPorter(wyndham, neville)\nStraw(werner, wyndham)\nArmenian(werner)\nPedate(opal)\nNeurotic(neville)\nforall x (Chew(x, wyndham) -> Chew(wyndham, werner))\nforall x (Straw(x, wyndham) -> Neurotic(wyndham))\nChew(werner, opal) -> Neurotic(werner)\nforall x (Porter(x, wyndham) -> Armenian(x))\nPorter(wyndham, opal) and Chew(wyndham, opal) -> Chew(wyndham, werner)\nforall x (Chew(x, wyndham) -> Sacculate(wyndham))\nPedate(wyndham) -> Chew(wyndham, werner)\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Pedate(x))\n\nPedate(wyndham)\n\nStraw(werner, wyndham) and forall x (Straw(x, wyndham) -> Neurotic(wyndham)) -> therefore Neurotic(wyndham) Neurotic(wyndham) and forall x (Neurotic(x) -> Pedate(x)) -> therefore Pedate(wyndham)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The morganica bake the neille. The morganica is necrotic. The morganica undershoot the nike. The neille bake the morganica. The neille is efficient. The tawsha is unlikely. The nike is unasked. If something become the morganica then the morganica become the neille. If something bake the morganica then the morganica is unasked. If the neille become the tawsha then the neille is unasked. If something undershoot the morganica then it is efficient. If the morganica undershoot the tawsha and the morganica become the tawsha then the morganica become the neille. If something become the morganica then the morganica is necrotic. If the morganica is unlikely then the morganica become the neille. If something is unasked then it is unlikely. The morganica is not unlikely.", "logic": "\nBake(morganica, neille)\nNecrotic(morganica)\nUndershoot(morganica, nike)\nBake(neille, morganica)\nEfficient(neille)\nUnlikely(tawsha)\nUnasked(nike)\nforall x (Become(x, morganica) -> Become(morganica, neille))\nforall x (Bake(x, morganica) -> Unasked(morganica))\nBecome(neille, tawsha) -> Unasked(neille)\nforall x (Undershoot(x, morganica) -> Efficient(x))\nUndershoot(morganica, tawsha) and Become(morganica, tawsha) -> Become(morganica, neille)\nforall x (Become(x, morganica) -> Necrotic(morganica))\nUnlikely(morganica) -> Become(morganica, neille)\nforall x (Unasked(x) -> Unlikely(x))\n\nnot Unlikely(morganica)\n\nBake(neille, morganica) and forall x (Bake(x, morganica) -> Unasked(morganica)) -> therefore Unasked(morganica) Unasked(morganica) and forall x (Unasked(x) -> Unlikely(x)) -> therefore Unlikely(morganica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The see isolate the noah. The see is prying. The see deaden the susan. The noah isolate the see. The noah is endemic. The demetre is amended. The susan is monandrous. If something interleave the see then the see interleave the noah. If something isolate the see then the see is monandrous. If the noah interleave the demetre then the noah is monandrous. If something deaden the see then it is endemic. If the see deaden the demetre and the see interleave the demetre then the see interleave the noah. If something interleave the see then the see is prying. If the see is amended then the see interleave the noah. If something is monandrous then it is amended. The see interleave the noah.", "logic": "\nIsolate(see, noah)\nPrying(see)\nDeaden(see, susan)\nIsolate(noah, see)\nEndemic(noah)\nAmended(demetre)\nMonandrous(susan)\nforall x (Interleave(x, see) -> Interleave(see, noah))\nforall x (Isolate(x, see) -> Monandrous(see))\nInterleave(noah, demetre) -> Monandrous(noah)\nforall x (Deaden(x, see) -> Endemic(x))\nDeaden(see, demetre) and Interleave(see, demetre) -> Interleave(see, noah)\nforall x (Interleave(x, see) -> Prying(see))\nAmended(see) -> Interleave(see, noah)\nforall x (Monandrous(x) -> Amended(x))\n\nInterleave(see, noah)\n\nIsolate(noah, see) and forall x (Isolate(x, see) -> Monandrous(see)) -> therefore Monandrous(see) Monandrous(see) and forall x (Monandrous(x) -> Amended(x)) -> therefore Amended(see) Amended(see) and Amended(see) -> Interleave(see, noah) -> therefore Interleave(see, noah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The leonidas insufflate the netti. The leonidas is lactic. The leonidas sightsing the barron. The netti insufflate the leonidas. The netti is nutrient. The glennis is fawning. The barron is grave. If something bloody the leonidas then the leonidas bloody the netti. If something insufflate the leonidas then the leonidas is grave. If the netti bloody the glennis then the netti is grave. If something sightsing the leonidas then it is nutrient. If the leonidas sightsing the glennis and the leonidas bloody the glennis then the leonidas bloody the netti. If something bloody the leonidas then the leonidas is lactic. If the leonidas is fawning then the leonidas bloody the netti. If something is grave then it is fawning. The leonidas does not see the netti.", "logic": "\nInsufflate(leonidas, netti)\nLactic(leonidas)\nSightsing(leonidas, barron)\nInsufflate(netti, leonidas)\nNutrient(netti)\nFawning(glennis)\nGrave(barron)\nforall x (Bloody(x, leonidas) -> Bloody(leonidas, netti))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, leonidas) -> Grave(leonidas))\nBloody(netti, glennis) -> Grave(netti)\nforall x (Sightsing(x, leonidas) -> Nutrient(x))\nSightsing(leonidas, glennis) and Bloody(leonidas, glennis) -> Bloody(leonidas, netti)\nforall x (Bloody(x, leonidas) -> Lactic(leonidas))\nFawning(leonidas) -> Bloody(leonidas, netti)\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Fawning(x))\n\nnot Bloody(leonidas, netti)\n\nInsufflate(netti, leonidas) and forall x (Insufflate(x, leonidas) -> Grave(leonidas)) -> therefore Grave(leonidas) Grave(leonidas) and forall x (Grave(x) -> Fawning(x)) -> therefore Fawning(leonidas) Fawning(leonidas) and Fawning(leonidas) -> Bloody(leonidas, netti) -> therefore Bloody(leonidas, netti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The henrietta neutralize the graig. The henrietta is dominating. The henrietta cachinnate the sylvester. The graig neutralize the henrietta. The graig is agreed. The herminia is antique. The sylvester is secondary. If something signify the henrietta then the henrietta signify the graig. If something neutralize the henrietta then the henrietta is secondary. If the graig signify the herminia then the graig is secondary. If something cachinnate the henrietta then it is agreed. If the henrietta cachinnate the herminia and the henrietta signify the herminia then the henrietta signify the graig. If something signify the henrietta then the henrietta is dominating. If the henrietta is antique then the henrietta signify the graig. If something is secondary then it is antique. The sylvester is not agreed.", "logic": "\nNeutralize(henrietta, graig)\nDominating(henrietta)\nCachinnate(henrietta, sylvester)\nNeutralize(graig, henrietta)\nAgreed(graig)\nAntique(herminia)\nSecondary(sylvester)\nforall x (Signify(x, henrietta) -> Signify(henrietta, graig))\nforall x (Neutralize(x, henrietta) -> Secondary(henrietta))\nSignify(graig, herminia) -> Secondary(graig)\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, henrietta) -> Agreed(x))\nCachinnate(henrietta, herminia) and Signify(henrietta, herminia) -> Signify(henrietta, graig)\nforall x (Signify(x, henrietta) -> Dominating(henrietta))\nAntique(henrietta) -> Signify(henrietta, graig)\nforall x (Secondary(x) -> Antique(x))\n\nnot Agreed(sylvester)\n\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, henrietta) -> Agreed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The desirae decelerate the ingeberg. The desirae is adoring. The desirae garage the malissa. The ingeberg decelerate the desirae. The ingeberg is conniving. The adora is viii. The malissa is cosher. If something forego the desirae then the desirae forego the ingeberg. If something decelerate the desirae then the desirae is cosher. If the ingeberg forego the adora then the ingeberg is cosher. If something garage the desirae then it is conniving. If the desirae garage the adora and the desirae forego the adora then the desirae forego the ingeberg. If something forego the desirae then the desirae is adoring. If the desirae is viii then the desirae forego the ingeberg. If something is cosher then it is viii. The adora is conniving.", "logic": "\nDecelerate(desirae, ingeberg)\nAdoring(desirae)\nGarage(desirae, malissa)\nDecelerate(ingeberg, desirae)\nConniving(ingeberg)\nViii(adora)\nCosher(malissa)\nforall x (Forego(x, desirae) -> Forego(desirae, ingeberg))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, desirae) -> Cosher(desirae))\nForego(ingeberg, adora) -> Cosher(ingeberg)\nforall x (Garage(x, desirae) -> Conniving(x))\nGarage(desirae, adora) and Forego(desirae, adora) -> Forego(desirae, ingeberg)\nforall x (Forego(x, desirae) -> Adoring(desirae))\nViii(desirae) -> Forego(desirae, ingeberg)\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> Viii(x))\n\nConniving(adora)\n\nforall x (Garage(x, desirae) -> Conniving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The sibilla forearm the preston. The sibilla is editorial. The sibilla decline the matthaeus. The preston forearm the sibilla. The preston is emaciated. The langston is weird. The matthaeus is kindred. If something shoetree the sibilla then the sibilla shoetree the preston. If something forearm the sibilla then the sibilla is kindred. If the preston shoetree the langston then the preston is kindred. If something decline the sibilla then it is emaciated. If the sibilla decline the langston and the sibilla shoetree the langston then the sibilla shoetree the preston. If something shoetree the sibilla then the sibilla is editorial. If the sibilla is weird then the sibilla shoetree the preston. If something is kindred then it is weird. The sibilla is not emaciated.", "logic": "\nForearm(sibilla, preston)\nEditorial(sibilla)\nDecline(sibilla, matthaeus)\nForearm(preston, sibilla)\nEmaciated(preston)\nWeird(langston)\nKindred(matthaeus)\nforall x (Shoetree(x, sibilla) -> Shoetree(sibilla, preston))\nforall x (Forearm(x, sibilla) -> Kindred(sibilla))\nShoetree(preston, langston) -> Kindred(preston)\nforall x (Decline(x, sibilla) -> Emaciated(x))\nDecline(sibilla, langston) and Shoetree(sibilla, langston) -> Shoetree(sibilla, preston)\nforall x (Shoetree(x, sibilla) -> Editorial(sibilla))\nWeird(sibilla) -> Shoetree(sibilla, preston)\nforall x (Kindred(x) -> Weird(x))\n\nnot Emaciated(sibilla)\n\nforall x (Decline(x, sibilla) -> Emaciated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The jeffry optimise the malina. The jeffry is exanimate. The jeffry loathe the sawyer. The malina optimise the jeffry. The malina is gastric. The flipper is glib. The sawyer is allargando. If something sour the jeffry then the jeffry sour the malina. If something optimise the jeffry then the jeffry is allargando. If the malina sour the flipper then the malina is allargando. If something loathe the jeffry then it is gastric. If the jeffry loathe the flipper and the jeffry sour the flipper then the jeffry sour the malina. If something sour the jeffry then the jeffry is exanimate. If the jeffry is glib then the jeffry sour the malina. If something is allargando then it is glib. The malina is glib.", "logic": "\nOptimise(jeffry, malina)\nExanimate(jeffry)\nLoathe(jeffry, sawyer)\nOptimise(malina, jeffry)\nGastric(malina)\nGlib(flipper)\nAllargando(sawyer)\nforall x (Sour(x, jeffry) -> Sour(jeffry, malina))\nforall x (Optimise(x, jeffry) -> Allargando(jeffry))\nSour(malina, flipper) -> Allargando(malina)\nforall x (Loathe(x, jeffry) -> Gastric(x))\nLoathe(jeffry, flipper) and Sour(jeffry, flipper) -> Sour(jeffry, malina)\nforall x (Sour(x, jeffry) -> Exanimate(jeffry))\nGlib(jeffry) -> Sour(jeffry, malina)\nforall x (Allargando(x) -> Glib(x))\n\nGlib(malina)\n\nforall x (Allargando(x) -> Glib(x)) <- Sour(malina, flipper) -> Allargando(malina) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The dinah emancipate the jenni. The dinah is indusial. The dinah demand the rebekah. The jenni emancipate the dinah. The jenni is bottom. The boniface is satiable. The rebekah is collarless. If something bouse the dinah then the dinah bouse the jenni. If something emancipate the dinah then the dinah is collarless. If the jenni bouse the boniface then the jenni is collarless. If something demand the dinah then it is bottom. If the dinah demand the boniface and the dinah bouse the boniface then the dinah bouse the jenni. If something bouse the dinah then the dinah is indusial. If the dinah is satiable then the dinah bouse the jenni. If something is collarless then it is satiable. The jenni does not see the rebekah.", "logic": "\nEmancipate(dinah, jenni)\nIndusial(dinah)\nDemand(dinah, rebekah)\nEmancipate(jenni, dinah)\nBottom(jenni)\nSatiable(boniface)\nCollarless(rebekah)\nforall x (Bouse(x, dinah) -> Bouse(dinah, jenni))\nforall x (Emancipate(x, dinah) -> Collarless(dinah))\nBouse(jenni, boniface) -> Collarless(jenni)\nforall x (Demand(x, dinah) -> Bottom(x))\nDemand(dinah, boniface) and Bouse(dinah, boniface) -> Bouse(dinah, jenni)\nforall x (Bouse(x, dinah) -> Indusial(dinah))\nSatiable(dinah) -> Bouse(dinah, jenni)\nforall x (Collarless(x) -> Satiable(x))\n\nnot Bouse(jenni, rebekah)\n\nnot Bouse(jenni, rebekah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The terese chirk the broddie. The terese is retroflex. The terese engild the gerhardt. The broddie chirk the terese. The broddie is valorous. The nil is smoggy. The gerhardt is searing. If something betroth the terese then the terese betroth the broddie. If something chirk the terese then the terese is searing. If the broddie betroth the nil then the broddie is searing. If something engild the terese then it is valorous. If the terese engild the nil and the terese betroth the nil then the terese betroth the broddie. If something betroth the terese then the terese is retroflex. If the terese is smoggy then the terese betroth the broddie. If something is searing then it is smoggy. The broddie betroth the broddie.", "logic": "\nChirk(terese, broddie)\nRetroflex(terese)\nEngild(terese, gerhardt)\nChirk(broddie, terese)\nValorous(broddie)\nSmoggy(nil)\nSearing(gerhardt)\nforall x (Betroth(x, terese) -> Betroth(terese, broddie))\nforall x (Chirk(x, terese) -> Searing(terese))\nBetroth(broddie, nil) -> Searing(broddie)\nforall x (Engild(x, terese) -> Valorous(x))\nEngild(terese, nil) and Betroth(terese, nil) -> Betroth(terese, broddie)\nforall x (Betroth(x, terese) -> Retroflex(terese))\nSmoggy(terese) -> Betroth(terese, broddie)\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Smoggy(x))\n\nBetroth(broddie, broddie)\n\nBetroth(broddie, broddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The gilli overwinter the selle. The gilli is honorary. The gilli reproach the arnie. The selle overwinter the gilli. The selle is petalled. The erda is jaundiced. The arnie is evident. If something instigate the gilli then the gilli instigate the selle. If something overwinter the gilli then the gilli is evident. If the selle instigate the erda then the selle is evident. If something reproach the gilli then it is petalled. If the gilli reproach the erda and the gilli instigate the erda then the gilli instigate the selle. If something instigate the gilli then the gilli is honorary. If the gilli is jaundiced then the gilli instigate the selle. If something is evident then it is jaundiced. The gilli does not visit the erda.", "logic": "\nOverwinter(gilli, selle)\nHonorary(gilli)\nReproach(gilli, arnie)\nOverwinter(selle, gilli)\nPetalled(selle)\nJaundiced(erda)\nEvident(arnie)\nforall x (Instigate(x, gilli) -> Instigate(gilli, selle))\nforall x (Overwinter(x, gilli) -> Evident(gilli))\nInstigate(selle, erda) -> Evident(selle)\nforall x (Reproach(x, gilli) -> Petalled(x))\nReproach(gilli, erda) and Instigate(gilli, erda) -> Instigate(gilli, selle)\nforall x (Instigate(x, gilli) -> Honorary(gilli))\nJaundiced(gilli) -> Instigate(gilli, selle)\nforall x (Evident(x) -> Jaundiced(x))\n\nnot Reproach(gilli, erda)\n\nnot Reproach(gilli, erda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The rikki blacken the etty. The rikki is botswanan. The rikki supplicate the leonora. The etty blacken the rikki. The etty is remedial. The darcee is customary. The leonora is jural. If something pale the rikki then the rikki pale the etty. If something blacken the rikki then the rikki is jural. If the etty pale the darcee then the etty is jural. If something supplicate the rikki then it is remedial. If the rikki supplicate the darcee and the rikki pale the darcee then the rikki pale the etty. If something pale the rikki then the rikki is botswanan. If the rikki is customary then the rikki pale the etty. If something is jural then it is customary. The darcee pale the leonora.", "logic": "\nBlacken(rikki, etty)\nBotswanan(rikki)\nSupplicate(rikki, leonora)\nBlacken(etty, rikki)\nRemedial(etty)\nCustomary(darcee)\nJural(leonora)\nforall x (Pale(x, rikki) -> Pale(rikki, etty))\nforall x (Blacken(x, rikki) -> Jural(rikki))\nPale(etty, darcee) -> Jural(etty)\nforall x (Supplicate(x, rikki) -> Remedial(x))\nSupplicate(rikki, darcee) and Pale(rikki, darcee) -> Pale(rikki, etty)\nforall x (Pale(x, rikki) -> Botswanan(rikki))\nCustomary(rikki) -> Pale(rikki, etty)\nforall x (Jural(x) -> Customary(x))\n\nPale(darcee, leonora)\n\nPale(darcee, leonora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The gerti rust the mikael. The thatch vivify the gerti. The mikael rust the gerti. If the mikael is movable and the mikael is unasked then the mikael does not like the thatch. If someone grouch the mikael then the mikael rust the thatch. If the gerti vivify the thatch then the thatch is spiked. If someone rust the thatch then they are unasked. If the mikael does not like the gerti and the mikael is not movable then the gerti vivify the thatch. If someone rust the thatch and they do not like the mikael then they need the gerti. If someone vivify the gerti then they need the mikael. If someone vivify the mikael and they do not like the thatch then the mikael does not need the thatch. The mikael rust the gerti.", "logic": "\nRust(gerti, mikael)\nVivify(thatch, gerti)\nRust(mikael, gerti)\nMovable(mikael) and Unasked(mikael) -> not Rust(mikael, thatch)\nforall x (Grouch(x, mikael) -> Rust(mikael, thatch))\nVivify(gerti, thatch) -> Spiked(thatch)\nforall x (Rust(x, thatch) -> Unasked(x))\nnot Rust(mikael, gerti) and not Movable(mikael) -> Vivify(gerti, thatch)\nforall x (Rust(x, thatch) and not Rust(x, mikael) -> Grouch(x, gerti))\nforall x (Vivify(x, gerti) -> Grouch(x, mikael))\nforall x (Vivify(x, mikael) and not Rust(x, thatch) -> not Grouch(mikael, thatch))\n\nRust(mikael, gerti)\n\ntherefore Rust(mikael, gerti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The georgetta precook the shelby. The jake stridulate the georgetta. The shelby precook the georgetta. If the shelby is protective and the shelby is under then the shelby does not like the jake. If someone rasterize the shelby then the shelby precook the jake. If the georgetta stridulate the jake then the jake is prime. If someone precook the jake then they are under. If the shelby does not like the georgetta and the shelby is not protective then the georgetta stridulate the jake. If someone precook the jake and they do not like the shelby then they need the georgetta. If someone stridulate the georgetta then they need the shelby. If someone stridulate the shelby and they do not like the jake then the shelby does not need the jake. The georgetta does not like the shelby.", "logic": "\nPrecook(georgetta, shelby)\nStridulate(jake, georgetta)\nPrecook(shelby, georgetta)\nProtective(shelby) and Under(shelby) -> not Precook(shelby, jake)\nforall x (Rasterize(x, shelby) -> Precook(shelby, jake))\nStridulate(georgetta, jake) -> Prime(jake)\nforall x (Precook(x, jake) -> Under(x))\nnot Precook(shelby, georgetta) and not Protective(shelby) -> Stridulate(georgetta, jake)\nforall x (Precook(x, jake) and not Precook(x, shelby) -> Rasterize(x, georgetta))\nforall x (Stridulate(x, georgetta) -> Rasterize(x, shelby))\nforall x (Stridulate(x, shelby) and not Precook(x, jake) -> not Rasterize(shelby, jake))\n\nnot Precook(georgetta, shelby)\n\ntherefore Precook(georgetta, shelby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The nonnah quell the nettle. The miguelita birdnest the nonnah. The nettle quell the nonnah. If the nettle is unborn and the nettle is ruandan then the nettle does not like the miguelita. If someone glut the nettle then the nettle quell the miguelita. If the nonnah birdnest the miguelita then the miguelita is falsetto. If someone quell the miguelita then they are ruandan. If the nettle does not like the nonnah and the nettle is not unborn then the nonnah birdnest the miguelita. If someone quell the miguelita and they do not like the nettle then they need the nonnah. If someone birdnest the nonnah then they need the nettle. If someone birdnest the nettle and they do not like the miguelita then the nettle does not need the miguelita. The miguelita glut the nettle.", "logic": "\nQuell(nonnah, nettle)\nBirdnest(miguelita, nonnah)\nQuell(nettle, nonnah)\nUnborn(nettle) and Ruandan(nettle) -> not Quell(nettle, miguelita)\nforall x (Glut(x, nettle) -> Quell(nettle, miguelita))\nBirdnest(nonnah, miguelita) -> Falsetto(miguelita)\nforall x (Quell(x, miguelita) -> Ruandan(x))\nnot Quell(nettle, nonnah) and not Unborn(nettle) -> Birdnest(nonnah, miguelita)\nforall x (Quell(x, miguelita) and not Quell(x, nettle) -> Glut(x, nonnah))\nforall x (Birdnest(x, nonnah) -> Glut(x, nettle))\nforall x (Birdnest(x, nettle) and not Quell(x, miguelita) -> not Glut(nettle, miguelita))\n\nGlut(miguelita, nettle)\n\nBirdnest(miguelita, nonnah) and forall x (Birdnest(x, nonnah) -> Glut(x, nettle)) -> therefore Glut(miguelita, nettle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The yehudi find the zary. The ricki husband the yehudi. The zary find the yehudi. If the zary is trifling and the zary is level then the zary does not like the ricki. If someone billet the zary then the zary find the ricki. If the yehudi husband the ricki then the ricki is chaldean. If someone find the ricki then they are level. If the zary does not like the yehudi and the zary is not trifling then the yehudi husband the ricki. If someone find the ricki and they do not like the zary then they need the yehudi. If someone husband the yehudi then they need the zary. If someone husband the zary and they do not like the ricki then the zary does not need the ricki. The ricki does not need the zary.", "logic": "\nFind(yehudi, zary)\nHusband(ricki, yehudi)\nFind(zary, yehudi)\nTrifling(zary) and Level(zary) -> not Find(zary, ricki)\nforall x (Billet(x, zary) -> Find(zary, ricki))\nHusband(yehudi, ricki) -> Chaldean(ricki)\nforall x (Find(x, ricki) -> Level(x))\nnot Find(zary, yehudi) and not Trifling(zary) -> Husband(yehudi, ricki)\nforall x (Find(x, ricki) and not Find(x, zary) -> Billet(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Husband(x, yehudi) -> Billet(x, zary))\nforall x (Husband(x, zary) and not Find(x, ricki) -> not Billet(zary, ricki))\n\nnot Billet(ricki, zary)\n\nHusband(ricki, yehudi) and forall x (Husband(x, yehudi) -> Billet(x, zary)) -> therefore Billet(ricki, zary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The saree epitomise the carlton. The tomasina perennate the saree. The carlton epitomise the saree. If the carlton is boughless and the carlton is mean then the carlton does not like the tomasina. If someone plop the carlton then the carlton epitomise the tomasina. If the saree perennate the tomasina then the tomasina is realistic. If someone epitomise the tomasina then they are mean. If the carlton does not like the saree and the carlton is not boughless then the saree perennate the tomasina. If someone epitomise the tomasina and they do not like the carlton then they need the saree. If someone perennate the saree then they need the carlton. If someone perennate the carlton and they do not like the tomasina then the carlton does not need the tomasina. The carlton epitomise the tomasina.", "logic": "\nEpitomise(saree, carlton)\nPerennate(tomasina, saree)\nEpitomise(carlton, saree)\nBoughless(carlton) and Mean(carlton) -> not Epitomise(carlton, tomasina)\nforall x (Plop(x, carlton) -> Epitomise(carlton, tomasina))\nPerennate(saree, tomasina) -> Realistic(tomasina)\nforall x (Epitomise(x, tomasina) -> Mean(x))\nnot Epitomise(carlton, saree) and not Boughless(carlton) -> Perennate(saree, tomasina)\nforall x (Epitomise(x, tomasina) and not Epitomise(x, carlton) -> Plop(x, saree))\nforall x (Perennate(x, saree) -> Plop(x, carlton))\nforall x (Perennate(x, carlton) and not Epitomise(x, tomasina) -> not Plop(carlton, tomasina))\n\nEpitomise(carlton, tomasina)\n\nPerennate(tomasina, saree) and forall x (Perennate(x, saree) -> Plop(x, carlton)) -> therefore Plop(tomasina, carlton) Plop(tomasina, carlton) and forall x (Plop(x, carlton) -> Epitomise(carlton, tomasina)) -> therefore Epitomise(carlton, tomasina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The vanny worship the oona. The benoite debrief the vanny. The oona worship the vanny. If the oona is removable and the oona is monotonic then the oona does not like the benoite. If someone bromate the oona then the oona worship the benoite. If the vanny debrief the benoite then the benoite is torrid. If someone worship the benoite then they are monotonic. If the oona does not like the vanny and the oona is not removable then the vanny debrief the benoite. If someone worship the benoite and they do not like the oona then they need the vanny. If someone debrief the vanny then they need the oona. If someone debrief the oona and they do not like the benoite then the oona does not need the benoite. The oona does not like the benoite.", "logic": "\nWorship(vanny, oona)\nDebrief(benoite, vanny)\nWorship(oona, vanny)\nRemovable(oona) and Monotonic(oona) -> not Worship(oona, benoite)\nforall x (Bromate(x, oona) -> Worship(oona, benoite))\nDebrief(vanny, benoite) -> Torrid(benoite)\nforall x (Worship(x, benoite) -> Monotonic(x))\nnot Worship(oona, vanny) and not Removable(oona) -> Debrief(vanny, benoite)\nforall x (Worship(x, benoite) and not Worship(x, oona) -> Bromate(x, vanny))\nforall x (Debrief(x, vanny) -> Bromate(x, oona))\nforall x (Debrief(x, oona) and not Worship(x, benoite) -> not Bromate(oona, benoite))\n\nnot Worship(oona, benoite)\n\nDebrief(benoite, vanny) and forall x (Debrief(x, vanny) -> Bromate(x, oona)) -> therefore Bromate(benoite, oona) Bromate(benoite, oona) and forall x (Bromate(x, oona) -> Worship(oona, benoite)) -> therefore Worship(oona, benoite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The max magnetise the beck. The arthur decry the max. The beck magnetise the max. If the beck is altaic and the beck is bound then the beck does not like the arthur. If someone reminisce the beck then the beck magnetise the arthur. If the max decry the arthur then the arthur is subaquatic. If someone magnetise the arthur then they are bound. If the beck does not like the max and the beck is not altaic then the max decry the arthur. If someone magnetise the arthur and they do not like the beck then they need the max. If someone decry the max then they need the beck. If someone decry the beck and they do not like the arthur then the beck does not need the arthur. The beck is bound.", "logic": "\nMagnetise(max, beck)\nDecry(arthur, max)\nMagnetise(beck, max)\nAltaic(beck) and Bound(beck) -> not Magnetise(beck, arthur)\nforall x (Reminisce(x, beck) -> Magnetise(beck, arthur))\nDecry(max, arthur) -> Subaquatic(arthur)\nforall x (Magnetise(x, arthur) -> Bound(x))\nnot Magnetise(beck, max) and not Altaic(beck) -> Decry(max, arthur)\nforall x (Magnetise(x, arthur) and not Magnetise(x, beck) -> Reminisce(x, max))\nforall x (Decry(x, max) -> Reminisce(x, beck))\nforall x (Decry(x, beck) and not Magnetise(x, arthur) -> not Reminisce(beck, arthur))\n\nBound(beck)\n\nDecry(arthur, max) and forall x (Decry(x, max) -> Reminisce(x, beck)) -> therefore Reminisce(arthur, beck) Reminisce(arthur, beck) and forall x (Reminisce(x, beck) -> Magnetise(beck, arthur)) -> therefore Magnetise(beck, arthur) Magnetise(beck, arthur) and forall x (Magnetise(x, arthur) -> Bound(x)) -> therefore Bound(beck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The clemence condition the gertrude. The auguste parley the clemence. The gertrude condition the clemence. If the gertrude is biaxial and the gertrude is inguinal then the gertrude does not like the auguste. If someone dropkick the gertrude then the gertrude condition the auguste. If the clemence parley the auguste then the auguste is imputable. If someone condition the auguste then they are inguinal. If the gertrude does not like the clemence and the gertrude is not biaxial then the clemence parley the auguste. If someone condition the auguste and they do not like the gertrude then they need the clemence. If someone parley the clemence then they need the gertrude. If someone parley the gertrude and they do not like the auguste then the gertrude does not need the auguste. The gertrude is not inguinal.", "logic": "\nCondition(clemence, gertrude)\nParley(auguste, clemence)\nCondition(gertrude, clemence)\nBiaxial(gertrude) and Inguinal(gertrude) -> not Condition(gertrude, auguste)\nforall x (Dropkick(x, gertrude) -> Condition(gertrude, auguste))\nParley(clemence, auguste) -> Imputable(auguste)\nforall x (Condition(x, auguste) -> Inguinal(x))\nnot Condition(gertrude, clemence) and not Biaxial(gertrude) -> Parley(clemence, auguste)\nforall x (Condition(x, auguste) and not Condition(x, gertrude) -> Dropkick(x, clemence))\nforall x (Parley(x, clemence) -> Dropkick(x, gertrude))\nforall x (Parley(x, gertrude) and not Condition(x, auguste) -> not Dropkick(gertrude, auguste))\n\nnot Inguinal(gertrude)\n\nParley(auguste, clemence) and forall x (Parley(x, clemence) -> Dropkick(x, gertrude)) -> therefore Dropkick(auguste, gertrude) Dropkick(auguste, gertrude) and forall x (Dropkick(x, gertrude) -> Condition(gertrude, auguste)) -> therefore Condition(gertrude, auguste) Condition(gertrude, auguste) and forall x (Condition(x, auguste) -> Inguinal(x)) -> therefore Inguinal(gertrude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The addie examine the moise. The ardra reeve the addie. The moise examine the addie. If the moise is animated and the moise is motherlike then the moise does not like the ardra. If someone pasteurise the moise then the moise examine the ardra. If the addie reeve the ardra then the ardra is aneroid. If someone examine the ardra then they are motherlike. If the moise does not like the addie and the moise is not animated then the addie reeve the ardra. If someone examine the ardra and they do not like the moise then they need the addie. If someone reeve the addie then they need the moise. If someone reeve the moise and they do not like the ardra then the moise does not need the ardra. The addie does not need the moise.", "logic": "\nExamine(addie, moise)\nReeve(ardra, addie)\nExamine(moise, addie)\nAnimated(moise) and Motherlike(moise) -> not Examine(moise, ardra)\nforall x (Pasteurise(x, moise) -> Examine(moise, ardra))\nReeve(addie, ardra) -> Aneroid(ardra)\nforall x (Examine(x, ardra) -> Motherlike(x))\nnot Examine(moise, addie) and not Animated(moise) -> Reeve(addie, ardra)\nforall x (Examine(x, ardra) and not Examine(x, moise) -> Pasteurise(x, addie))\nforall x (Reeve(x, addie) -> Pasteurise(x, moise))\nforall x (Reeve(x, moise) and not Examine(x, ardra) -> not Pasteurise(moise, ardra))\n\nnot Pasteurise(addie, moise)\n\nforall x (Reeve(x, addie) -> Pasteurise(x, moise)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The george dandify the nicoline. The joyce luminesce the george. The nicoline dandify the george. If the nicoline is annulate and the nicoline is swimming then the nicoline does not like the joyce. If someone implore the nicoline then the nicoline dandify the joyce. If the george luminesce the joyce then the joyce is unfattened. If someone dandify the joyce then they are swimming. If the nicoline does not like the george and the nicoline is not annulate then the george luminesce the joyce. If someone dandify the joyce and they do not like the nicoline then they need the george. If someone luminesce the george then they need the nicoline. If someone luminesce the nicoline and they do not like the joyce then the nicoline does not need the joyce. The joyce is swimming.", "logic": "\nDandify(george, nicoline)\nLuminesce(joyce, george)\nDandify(nicoline, george)\nAnnulate(nicoline) and Swimming(nicoline) -> not Dandify(nicoline, joyce)\nforall x (Implore(x, nicoline) -> Dandify(nicoline, joyce))\nLuminesce(george, joyce) -> Unfattened(joyce)\nforall x (Dandify(x, joyce) -> Swimming(x))\nnot Dandify(nicoline, george) and not Annulate(nicoline) -> Luminesce(george, joyce)\nforall x (Dandify(x, joyce) and not Dandify(x, nicoline) -> Implore(x, george))\nforall x (Luminesce(x, george) -> Implore(x, nicoline))\nforall x (Luminesce(x, nicoline) and not Dandify(x, joyce) -> not Implore(nicoline, joyce))\n\nSwimming(joyce)\n\nforall x (Dandify(x, joyce) -> Swimming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The bonnee shmoose the yule. The caro visualize the bonnee. The yule shmoose the bonnee. If the yule is dense and the yule is aureate then the yule does not like the caro. If someone exonerate the yule then the yule shmoose the caro. If the bonnee visualize the caro then the caro is adjacent. If someone shmoose the caro then they are aureate. If the yule does not like the bonnee and the yule is not dense then the bonnee visualize the caro. If someone shmoose the caro and they do not like the yule then they need the bonnee. If someone visualize the bonnee then they need the yule. If someone visualize the yule and they do not like the caro then the yule does not need the caro. The caro does not need the bonnee.", "logic": "\nShmoose(bonnee, yule)\nVisualize(caro, bonnee)\nShmoose(yule, bonnee)\nDense(yule) and Aureate(yule) -> not Shmoose(yule, caro)\nforall x (Exonerate(x, yule) -> Shmoose(yule, caro))\nVisualize(bonnee, caro) -> Adjacent(caro)\nforall x (Shmoose(x, caro) -> Aureate(x))\nnot Shmoose(yule, bonnee) and not Dense(yule) -> Visualize(bonnee, caro)\nforall x (Shmoose(x, caro) and not Shmoose(x, yule) -> Exonerate(x, bonnee))\nforall x (Visualize(x, bonnee) -> Exonerate(x, yule))\nforall x (Visualize(x, yule) and not Shmoose(x, caro) -> not Exonerate(yule, caro))\n\nnot Exonerate(caro, bonnee)\n\nforall x (Shmoose(x, caro) and not Shmoose(x, yule) -> Exonerate(x, bonnee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The fremont sizz the jordanna. The broderick sneak the fremont. The jordanna sizz the fremont. If the jordanna is transposed and the jordanna is gimcrack then the jordanna does not like the broderick. If someone capsulate the jordanna then the jordanna sizz the broderick. If the fremont sneak the broderick then the broderick is sere. If someone sizz the broderick then they are gimcrack. If the jordanna does not like the fremont and the jordanna is not transposed then the fremont sneak the broderick. If someone sizz the broderick and they do not like the jordanna then they need the fremont. If someone sneak the fremont then they need the jordanna. If someone sneak the jordanna and they do not like the broderick then the jordanna does not need the broderick. The jordanna capsulate the fremont.", "logic": "\nSizz(fremont, jordanna)\nSneak(broderick, fremont)\nSizz(jordanna, fremont)\nTransposed(jordanna) and Gimcrack(jordanna) -> not Sizz(jordanna, broderick)\nforall x (Capsulate(x, jordanna) -> Sizz(jordanna, broderick))\nSneak(fremont, broderick) -> Sere(broderick)\nforall x (Sizz(x, broderick) -> Gimcrack(x))\nnot Sizz(jordanna, fremont) and not Transposed(jordanna) -> Sneak(fremont, broderick)\nforall x (Sizz(x, broderick) and not Sizz(x, jordanna) -> Capsulate(x, fremont))\nforall x (Sneak(x, fremont) -> Capsulate(x, jordanna))\nforall x (Sneak(x, jordanna) and not Sizz(x, broderick) -> not Capsulate(jordanna, broderick))\n\nCapsulate(jordanna, fremont)\n\nforall x (Sizz(x, broderick) and not Sizz(x, jordanna) -> Capsulate(x, fremont)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The loleta sabre the tony. The izzy pleat the loleta. The tony sabre the loleta. If the tony is looking and the tony is abeyant then the tony does not like the izzy. If someone offload the tony then the tony sabre the izzy. If the loleta pleat the izzy then the izzy is drawn. If someone sabre the izzy then they are abeyant. If the tony does not like the loleta and the tony is not looking then the loleta pleat the izzy. If someone sabre the izzy and they do not like the tony then they need the loleta. If someone pleat the loleta then they need the tony. If someone pleat the tony and they do not like the izzy then the tony does not need the izzy. The tony is not young.", "logic": "\nSabre(loleta, tony)\nPleat(izzy, loleta)\nSabre(tony, loleta)\nLooking(tony) and Abeyant(tony) -> not Sabre(tony, izzy)\nforall x (Offload(x, tony) -> Sabre(tony, izzy))\nPleat(loleta, izzy) -> Drawn(izzy)\nforall x (Sabre(x, izzy) -> Abeyant(x))\nnot Sabre(tony, loleta) and not Looking(tony) -> Pleat(loleta, izzy)\nforall x (Sabre(x, izzy) and not Sabre(x, tony) -> Offload(x, loleta))\nforall x (Pleat(x, loleta) -> Offload(x, tony))\nforall x (Pleat(x, tony) and not Sabre(x, izzy) -> not Offload(tony, izzy))\n\nnot Young(tony)\n\nnot Young(tony) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The barnie salvage the jon. The maure hitch the barnie. The jon salvage the barnie. If the jon is receptive and the jon is mammary then the jon does not like the maure. If someone reopen the jon then the jon salvage the maure. If the barnie hitch the maure then the maure is impeding. If someone salvage the maure then they are mammary. If the jon does not like the barnie and the jon is not receptive then the barnie hitch the maure. If someone salvage the maure and they do not like the jon then they need the barnie. If someone hitch the barnie then they need the jon. If someone hitch the jon and they do not like the maure then the jon does not need the maure. The barnie hitch the barnie.", "logic": "\nSalvage(barnie, jon)\nHitch(maure, barnie)\nSalvage(jon, barnie)\nReceptive(jon) and Mammary(jon) -> not Salvage(jon, maure)\nforall x (Reopen(x, jon) -> Salvage(jon, maure))\nHitch(barnie, maure) -> Impeding(maure)\nforall x (Salvage(x, maure) -> Mammary(x))\nnot Salvage(jon, barnie) and not Receptive(jon) -> Hitch(barnie, maure)\nforall x (Salvage(x, maure) and not Salvage(x, jon) -> Reopen(x, barnie))\nforall x (Hitch(x, barnie) -> Reopen(x, jon))\nforall x (Hitch(x, jon) and not Salvage(x, maure) -> not Reopen(jon, maure))\n\nHitch(barnie, barnie)\n\nHitch(barnie, barnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The amabel outface the bailie. The cooper cuss the amabel. The bailie outface the amabel. If the bailie is bedridden and the bailie is stocked then the bailie does not like the cooper. If someone syllabise the bailie then the bailie outface the cooper. If the amabel cuss the cooper then the cooper is ascitic. If someone outface the cooper then they are stocked. If the bailie does not like the amabel and the bailie is not bedridden then the amabel cuss the cooper. If someone outface the cooper and they do not like the bailie then they need the amabel. If someone cuss the amabel then they need the bailie. If someone cuss the bailie and they do not like the cooper then the bailie does not need the cooper. The cooper does not eat the cooper.", "logic": "\nOutface(amabel, bailie)\nCuss(cooper, amabel)\nOutface(bailie, amabel)\nBedridden(bailie) and Stocked(bailie) -> not Outface(bailie, cooper)\nforall x (Syllabise(x, bailie) -> Outface(bailie, cooper))\nCuss(amabel, cooper) -> Ascitic(cooper)\nforall x (Outface(x, cooper) -> Stocked(x))\nnot Outface(bailie, amabel) and not Bedridden(bailie) -> Cuss(amabel, cooper)\nforall x (Outface(x, cooper) and not Outface(x, bailie) -> Syllabise(x, amabel))\nforall x (Cuss(x, amabel) -> Syllabise(x, bailie))\nforall x (Cuss(x, bailie) and not Outface(x, cooper) -> not Syllabise(bailie, cooper))\n\nnot Cuss(cooper, cooper)\n\nnot Cuss(cooper, cooper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The bettina devil the carlynn. The lockwood seduce the bettina. The carlynn devil the bettina. If the carlynn is globular and the carlynn is titanic then the carlynn does not like the lockwood. If someone birl the carlynn then the carlynn devil the lockwood. If the bettina seduce the lockwood then the lockwood is manifold. If someone devil the lockwood then they are titanic. If the carlynn does not like the bettina and the carlynn is not globular then the bettina seduce the lockwood. If someone devil the lockwood and they do not like the carlynn then they need the bettina. If someone seduce the bettina then they need the carlynn. If someone seduce the carlynn and they do not like the lockwood then the carlynn does not need the lockwood. The lockwood is young.", "logic": "\nDevil(bettina, carlynn)\nSeduce(lockwood, bettina)\nDevil(carlynn, bettina)\nGlobular(carlynn) and Titanic(carlynn) -> not Devil(carlynn, lockwood)\nforall x (Birl(x, carlynn) -> Devil(carlynn, lockwood))\nSeduce(bettina, lockwood) -> Manifold(lockwood)\nforall x (Devil(x, lockwood) -> Titanic(x))\nnot Devil(carlynn, bettina) and not Globular(carlynn) -> Seduce(bettina, lockwood)\nforall x (Devil(x, lockwood) and not Devil(x, carlynn) -> Birl(x, bettina))\nforall x (Seduce(x, bettina) -> Birl(x, carlynn))\nforall x (Seduce(x, carlynn) and not Devil(x, lockwood) -> not Birl(carlynn, lockwood))\n\nYoung(lockwood)\n\nYoung(lockwood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The forbes is poached. If the forbes is arithmetic then the forbes is golden. If something is arithmetic and cutting then it is golden. If something is cutting then it is not arithmetic. If something is terrified then it is arithmetic. If something is golden and not cutting then it is arithmetic. Kind things are poached. All poached things are terrified. If something is arithmetic and not cutting then it is terrified. The forbes is poached.", "logic": "\nPoached(forbes)\nArithmetic(forbes) -> Golden(forbes)\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) and Cutting(x) -> Golden(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> not Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Terrified(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Golden(x) and not Cutting(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Terrified(x) -> Poached(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) -> Terrified(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) and not Cutting(x) -> Terrified(x))\n\nPoached(forbes)\n\ntherefore Poached(forbes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The elisabeth is autonomous. If the elisabeth is unsecured then the elisabeth is inclined. If something is unsecured and undefended then it is inclined. If something is undefended then it is not unsecured. If something is acerate then it is unsecured. If something is inclined and not undefended then it is unsecured. Kind things are autonomous. All autonomous things are acerate. If something is unsecured and not undefended then it is acerate. The elisabeth is not autonomous.", "logic": "\nAutonomous(elisabeth)\nUnsecured(elisabeth) -> Inclined(elisabeth)\nforall x (Unsecured(x) and Undefended(x) -> Inclined(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) -> not Unsecured(x))\nforall x (Acerate(x) -> Unsecured(x))\nforall x (Inclined(x) and not Undefended(x) -> Unsecured(x))\nforall x (Acerate(x) -> Autonomous(x))\nforall x (Autonomous(x) -> Acerate(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) and not Undefended(x) -> Acerate(x))\n\nnot Autonomous(elisabeth)\n\ntherefore Autonomous(elisabeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The diego is sonic. If the diego is scowling then the diego is antecedent. If something is scowling and runaway then it is antecedent. If something is runaway then it is not scowling. If something is suckled then it is scowling. If something is antecedent and not runaway then it is scowling. Kind things are sonic. All sonic things are suckled. If something is scowling and not runaway then it is suckled. The diego is suckled.", "logic": "\nSonic(diego)\nScowling(diego) -> Antecedent(diego)\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Runaway(x) -> Antecedent(x))\nforall x (Runaway(x) -> not Scowling(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Antecedent(x) and not Runaway(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> Sonic(x))\nforall x (Sonic(x) -> Suckled(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and not Runaway(x) -> Suckled(x))\n\nSuckled(diego)\n\nSonic(diego) and forall x (Sonic(x) -> Suckled(x)) -> therefore Suckled(diego)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The leontyne is fanged. If the leontyne is straggly then the leontyne is said. If something is straggly and romance then it is said. If something is romance then it is not straggly. If something is escaped then it is straggly. If something is said and not romance then it is straggly. Kind things are fanged. All fanged things are escaped. If something is straggly and not romance then it is escaped. The leontyne is not escaped.", "logic": "\nFanged(leontyne)\nStraggly(leontyne) -> Said(leontyne)\nforall x (Straggly(x) and Romance(x) -> Said(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) -> not Straggly(x))\nforall x (Escaped(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Said(x) and not Romance(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Escaped(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Escaped(x))\nforall x (Straggly(x) and not Romance(x) -> Escaped(x))\n\nnot Escaped(leontyne)\n\nFanged(leontyne) and forall x (Fanged(x) -> Escaped(x)) -> therefore Escaped(leontyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The honoria is unicuspid. If the honoria is septic then the honoria is savage. If something is septic and admired then it is savage. If something is admired then it is not septic. If something is fizzy then it is septic. If something is savage and not admired then it is septic. Kind things are unicuspid. All unicuspid things are fizzy. If something is septic and not admired then it is fizzy. The honoria is septic.", "logic": "\nUnicuspid(honoria)\nSeptic(honoria) -> Savage(honoria)\nforall x (Septic(x) and Admired(x) -> Savage(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) -> not Septic(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Septic(x))\nforall x (Savage(x) and not Admired(x) -> Septic(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Septic(x) and not Admired(x) -> Fizzy(x))\n\nSeptic(honoria)\n\nUnicuspid(honoria) and forall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Fizzy(x)) -> therefore Fizzy(honoria) Fizzy(honoria) and forall x (Fizzy(x) -> Septic(x)) -> therefore Septic(honoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The standford is homocercal. If the standford is fisheye then the standford is grim. If something is fisheye and boffo then it is grim. If something is boffo then it is not fisheye. If something is unknowing then it is fisheye. If something is grim and not boffo then it is fisheye. Kind things are homocercal. All homocercal things are unknowing. If something is fisheye and not boffo then it is unknowing. The standford is not fisheye.", "logic": "\nHomocercal(standford)\nFisheye(standford) -> Grim(standford)\nforall x (Fisheye(x) and Boffo(x) -> Grim(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> not Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Unknowing(x) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Grim(x) and not Boffo(x) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Unknowing(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) -> Unknowing(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) and not Boffo(x) -> Unknowing(x))\n\nnot Fisheye(standford)\n\nHomocercal(standford) and forall x (Homocercal(x) -> Unknowing(x)) -> therefore Unknowing(standford) Unknowing(standford) and forall x (Unknowing(x) -> Fisheye(x)) -> therefore Fisheye(standford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The ollie is packaged. If the ollie is cadent then the ollie is criminal. If something is cadent and newtonian then it is criminal. If something is newtonian then it is not cadent. If something is baffled then it is cadent. If something is criminal and not newtonian then it is cadent. Kind things are packaged. All packaged things are baffled. If something is cadent and not newtonian then it is baffled. The ollie is criminal.", "logic": "\nPackaged(ollie)\nCadent(ollie) -> Criminal(ollie)\nforall x (Cadent(x) and Newtonian(x) -> Criminal(x))\nforall x (Newtonian(x) -> not Cadent(x))\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Cadent(x))\nforall x (Criminal(x) and not Newtonian(x) -> Cadent(x))\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> Baffled(x))\nforall x (Cadent(x) and not Newtonian(x) -> Baffled(x))\n\nCriminal(ollie)\n\nPackaged(ollie) and forall x (Packaged(x) -> Baffled(x)) -> therefore Baffled(ollie) Baffled(ollie) and forall x (Baffled(x) -> Cadent(x)) -> therefore Cadent(ollie) Cadent(ollie) and Cadent(ollie) -> Criminal(ollie) -> therefore Criminal(ollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The plato is ossified. If the plato is vestiary then the plato is tortuous. If something is vestiary and japanese then it is tortuous. If something is japanese then it is not vestiary. If something is amaurotic then it is vestiary. If something is tortuous and not japanese then it is vestiary. Kind things are ossified. All ossified things are amaurotic. If something is vestiary and not japanese then it is amaurotic. The plato is not tortuous.", "logic": "\nOssified(plato)\nVestiary(plato) -> Tortuous(plato)\nforall x (Vestiary(x) and Japanese(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> not Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Tortuous(x) and not Japanese(x) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Amaurotic(x))\nforall x (Vestiary(x) and not Japanese(x) -> Amaurotic(x))\n\nnot Tortuous(plato)\n\nOssified(plato) and forall x (Ossified(x) -> Amaurotic(x)) -> therefore Amaurotic(plato) Amaurotic(plato) and forall x (Amaurotic(x) -> Vestiary(x)) -> therefore Vestiary(plato) Vestiary(plato) and Vestiary(plato) -> Tortuous(plato) -> therefore Tortuous(plato)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The hali is huge. If the hali is pivotal then the hali is ungroomed. If something is pivotal and spendable then it is ungroomed. If something is spendable then it is not pivotal. If something is forgiving then it is pivotal. If something is ungroomed and not spendable then it is pivotal. Kind things are huge. All huge things are forgiving. If something is pivotal and not spendable then it is forgiving. The hali does not need the hali.", "logic": "\nHuge(hali)\nPivotal(hali) -> Ungroomed(hali)\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and Spendable(x) -> Ungroomed(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> not Pivotal(x))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> Pivotal(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) and not Spendable(x) -> Pivotal(x))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> Huge(x))\nforall x (Huge(x) -> Forgiving(x))\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and not Spendable(x) -> Forgiving(x))\n\nnot Needs(hali, hali)\n\nnot Needs(hali, hali) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The lucienne is flimsy. If the lucienne is liturgical then the lucienne is capacitive. If something is liturgical and booted then it is capacitive. If something is booted then it is not liturgical. If something is isocyclic then it is liturgical. If something is capacitive and not booted then it is liturgical. Kind things are flimsy. All flimsy things are isocyclic. If something is liturgical and not booted then it is isocyclic. The lucienne sees the lucienne.", "logic": "\nFlimsy(lucienne)\nLiturgical(lucienne) -> Capacitive(lucienne)\nforall x (Liturgical(x) and Booted(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) -> not Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) and not Booted(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) -> Flimsy(x))\nforall x (Flimsy(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) and not Booted(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\n\nSees(lucienne, lucienne)\n\nSees(lucienne, lucienne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The roze is cataclinal. If the roze is variable then the roze is xxvii. If something is variable and sweptback then it is xxvii. If something is sweptback then it is not variable. If something is upscale then it is variable. If something is xxvii and not sweptback then it is variable. Kind things are cataclinal. All cataclinal things are upscale. If something is variable and not sweptback then it is upscale. The roze does not visit the roze.", "logic": "\nCataclinal(roze)\nVariable(roze) -> Xxvii(roze)\nforall x (Variable(x) and Sweptback(x) -> Xxvii(x))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) -> not Variable(x))\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Variable(x))\nforall x (Xxvii(x) and not Sweptback(x) -> Variable(x))\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) -> Upscale(x))\nforall x (Variable(x) and not Sweptback(x) -> Upscale(x))\n\nnot Visits(roze, roze)\n\nnot Visits(roze, roze) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The camala is boughten. If the camala is unerect then the camala is bombastic. If something is unerect and brumal then it is bombastic. If something is brumal then it is not unerect. If something is fitted then it is unerect. If something is bombastic and not brumal then it is unerect. Kind things are boughten. All boughten things are fitted. If something is unerect and not brumal then it is fitted. The camala is brumal.", "logic": "\nBoughten(camala)\nUnerect(camala) -> Bombastic(camala)\nforall x (Unerect(x) and Brumal(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> not Unerect(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and not Brumal(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Boughten(x))\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Fitted(x))\nforall x (Unerect(x) and not Brumal(x) -> Fitted(x))\n\nBrumal(camala)\n\nBrumal(camala) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "Trix is hoggish. Trix is ungeared. Trix is coeliac. Lawson is hoggish. Lawson is spacious. Lawson is coeliac. Lawson is corruptive. All coeliac, corruptive things are ungeared. If something is corruptive then it is spacious. If Trix is ungeared then Trix is hoggish. If Trix is corruptive then Trix is spacious. All spacious, coeliac things are reparable. All hoggish, spacious things are corruptive. If something is coeliac then it is corruptive. If something is corruptive then it is spacious. Trix is ungeared.", "logic": "\nHoggish(trix)\nUngeared(trix)\nCoeliac(trix)\nHoggish(lawson)\nSpacious(lawson)\nCoeliac(lawson)\nCorruptive(lawson)\nforall x (Coeliac(x) and Corruptive(x) -> Ungeared(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Spacious(x))\nUngeared(trix) -> Hoggish(trix)\nCorruptive(trix) -> Spacious(trix)\nforall x (Spacious(x) and Coeliac(x) -> Reparable(x))\nforall x (Hoggish(x) and Spacious(x) -> Corruptive(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Corruptive(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Spacious(x))\n\nUngeared(trix)\n\ntherefore Ungeared(trix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Reece is rutted. Reece is floodlit. Reece is vacillant. Quintana is rutted. Quintana is carpal. Quintana is vacillant. Quintana is bankrupt. All vacillant, bankrupt things are floodlit. If something is bankrupt then it is carpal. If Reece is floodlit then Reece is rutted. If Reece is bankrupt then Reece is carpal. All carpal, vacillant things are masterly. All rutted, carpal things are bankrupt. If something is vacillant then it is bankrupt. If something is bankrupt then it is carpal. Quintana is not bankrupt.", "logic": "\nRutted(reece)\nFloodlit(reece)\nVacillant(reece)\nRutted(quintana)\nCarpal(quintana)\nVacillant(quintana)\nBankrupt(quintana)\nforall x (Vacillant(x) and Bankrupt(x) -> Floodlit(x))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Carpal(x))\nFloodlit(reece) -> Rutted(reece)\nBankrupt(reece) -> Carpal(reece)\nforall x (Carpal(x) and Vacillant(x) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Rutted(x) and Carpal(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Carpal(x))\n\nnot Bankrupt(quintana)\n\ntherefore Bankrupt(quintana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Dorolice is pickled. Dorolice is amazing. Dorolice is draggled. Germana is pickled. Germana is sublimed. Germana is draggled. Germana is recurvate. All draggled, recurvate things are amazing. If something is recurvate then it is sublimed. If Dorolice is amazing then Dorolice is pickled. If Dorolice is recurvate then Dorolice is sublimed. All sublimed, draggled things are thalloid. All pickled, sublimed things are recurvate. If something is draggled then it is recurvate. If something is recurvate then it is sublimed. Germana is thalloid.", "logic": "\nPickled(dorolice)\nAmazing(dorolice)\nDraggled(dorolice)\nPickled(germana)\nSublimed(germana)\nDraggled(germana)\nRecurvate(germana)\nforall x (Draggled(x) and Recurvate(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) -> Sublimed(x))\nAmazing(dorolice) -> Pickled(dorolice)\nRecurvate(dorolice) -> Sublimed(dorolice)\nforall x (Sublimed(x) and Draggled(x) -> Thalloid(x))\nforall x (Pickled(x) and Sublimed(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nforall x (Draggled(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) -> Sublimed(x))\n\nThalloid(germana)\n\nSublimed(germana) and Draggled(germana) and forall x (Sublimed(x) and Draggled(x) -> Thalloid(x)) -> therefore Thalloid(germana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Perry is conductive. Perry is latino. Perry is tripartite. Aurelea is conductive. Aurelea is allegretto. Aurelea is tripartite. Aurelea is anestrous. All tripartite, anestrous things are latino. If something is anestrous then it is allegretto. If Perry is latino then Perry is conductive. If Perry is anestrous then Perry is allegretto. All allegretto, tripartite things are vesicant. All conductive, allegretto things are anestrous. If something is tripartite then it is anestrous. If something is anestrous then it is allegretto. Perry is not anestrous.", "logic": "\nConductive(perry)\nLatino(perry)\nTripartite(perry)\nConductive(aurelea)\nAllegretto(aurelea)\nTripartite(aurelea)\nAnestrous(aurelea)\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and Anestrous(x) -> Latino(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> Allegretto(x))\nLatino(perry) -> Conductive(perry)\nAnestrous(perry) -> Allegretto(perry)\nforall x (Allegretto(x) and Tripartite(x) -> Vesicant(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Allegretto(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> Allegretto(x))\n\nnot Anestrous(perry)\n\nTripartite(perry) and forall x (Tripartite(x) -> Anestrous(x)) -> therefore Anestrous(perry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Breena is mishnaic. Breena is coruscant. Breena is veteran. Dasha is mishnaic. Dasha is returnable. Dasha is veteran. Dasha is leguminous. All veteran, leguminous things are coruscant. If something is leguminous then it is returnable. If Breena is coruscant then Breena is mishnaic. If Breena is leguminous then Breena is returnable. All returnable, veteran things are cesarian. All mishnaic, returnable things are leguminous. If something is veteran then it is leguminous. If something is leguminous then it is returnable. Breena is returnable.", "logic": "\nMishnaic(breena)\nCoruscant(breena)\nVeteran(breena)\nMishnaic(dasha)\nReturnable(dasha)\nVeteran(dasha)\nLeguminous(dasha)\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Leguminous(x) -> Coruscant(x))\nforall x (Leguminous(x) -> Returnable(x))\nCoruscant(breena) -> Mishnaic(breena)\nLeguminous(breena) -> Returnable(breena)\nforall x (Returnable(x) and Veteran(x) -> Cesarian(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) and Returnable(x) -> Leguminous(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) -> Leguminous(x))\nforall x (Leguminous(x) -> Returnable(x))\n\nReturnable(breena)\n\nVeteran(breena) and forall x (Veteran(x) -> Leguminous(x)) -> therefore Leguminous(breena) Leguminous(breena) and forall x (Leguminous(x) -> Returnable(x)) -> therefore Returnable(breena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Simone is bismuthal. Simone is meaningful. Simone is uncensored. Shela is bismuthal. Shela is chimeric. Shela is uncensored. Shela is incurvate. All uncensored, incurvate things are meaningful. If something is incurvate then it is chimeric. If Simone is meaningful then Simone is bismuthal. If Simone is incurvate then Simone is chimeric. All chimeric, uncensored things are raucous. All bismuthal, chimeric things are incurvate. If something is uncensored then it is incurvate. If something is incurvate then it is chimeric. Simone is not chimeric.", "logic": "\nBismuthal(simone)\nMeaningful(simone)\nUncensored(simone)\nBismuthal(shela)\nChimeric(shela)\nUncensored(shela)\nIncurvate(shela)\nforall x (Uncensored(x) and Incurvate(x) -> Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x) -> Chimeric(x))\nMeaningful(simone) -> Bismuthal(simone)\nIncurvate(simone) -> Chimeric(simone)\nforall x (Chimeric(x) and Uncensored(x) -> Raucous(x))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) and Chimeric(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nforall x (Uncensored(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x) -> Chimeric(x))\n\nnot Chimeric(simone)\n\nUncensored(simone) and forall x (Uncensored(x) -> Incurvate(x)) -> therefore Incurvate(simone) Incurvate(simone) and forall x (Incurvate(x) -> Chimeric(x)) -> therefore Chimeric(simone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Rafaelia is reddish. Rafaelia is provencal. Rafaelia is adynamic. Cornelle is reddish. Cornelle is socialized. Cornelle is adynamic. Cornelle is realized. All adynamic, realized things are provencal. If something is realized then it is socialized. If Rafaelia is provencal then Rafaelia is reddish. If Rafaelia is realized then Rafaelia is socialized. All socialized, adynamic things are designing. All reddish, socialized things are realized. If something is adynamic then it is realized. If something is realized then it is socialized. Rafaelia is designing.", "logic": "\nReddish(rafaelia)\nProvencal(rafaelia)\nAdynamic(rafaelia)\nReddish(cornelle)\nSocialized(cornelle)\nAdynamic(cornelle)\nRealized(cornelle)\nforall x (Adynamic(x) and Realized(x) -> Provencal(x))\nforall x (Realized(x) -> Socialized(x))\nProvencal(rafaelia) -> Reddish(rafaelia)\nRealized(rafaelia) -> Socialized(rafaelia)\nforall x (Socialized(x) and Adynamic(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Reddish(x) and Socialized(x) -> Realized(x))\nforall x (Adynamic(x) -> Realized(x))\nforall x (Realized(x) -> Socialized(x))\n\nDesigning(rafaelia)\n\nAdynamic(rafaelia) and forall x (Adynamic(x) -> Realized(x)) -> therefore Realized(rafaelia) Realized(rafaelia) and forall x (Realized(x) -> Socialized(x)) -> therefore Socialized(rafaelia) Socialized(rafaelia) and Adynamic(rafaelia) and forall x (Socialized(x) and Adynamic(x) -> Designing(x)) -> therefore Designing(rafaelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Anselma is batholitic. Anselma is canny. Anselma is isochronal. Gonzales is batholitic. Gonzales is arillate. Gonzales is isochronal. Gonzales is carnassial. All isochronal, carnassial things are canny. If something is carnassial then it is arillate. If Anselma is canny then Anselma is batholitic. If Anselma is carnassial then Anselma is arillate. All arillate, isochronal things are spinose. All batholitic, arillate things are carnassial. If something is isochronal then it is carnassial. If something is carnassial then it is arillate. Anselma is not spinose.", "logic": "\nBatholitic(anselma)\nCanny(anselma)\nIsochronal(anselma)\nBatholitic(gonzales)\nArillate(gonzales)\nIsochronal(gonzales)\nCarnassial(gonzales)\nforall x (Isochronal(x) and Carnassial(x) -> Canny(x))\nforall x (Carnassial(x) -> Arillate(x))\nCanny(anselma) -> Batholitic(anselma)\nCarnassial(anselma) -> Arillate(anselma)\nforall x (Arillate(x) and Isochronal(x) -> Spinose(x))\nforall x (Batholitic(x) and Arillate(x) -> Carnassial(x))\nforall x (Isochronal(x) -> Carnassial(x))\nforall x (Carnassial(x) -> Arillate(x))\n\nnot Spinose(anselma)\n\nIsochronal(anselma) and forall x (Isochronal(x) -> Carnassial(x)) -> therefore Carnassial(anselma) Carnassial(anselma) and forall x (Carnassial(x) -> Arillate(x)) -> therefore Arillate(anselma) Arillate(anselma) and Isochronal(anselma) and forall x (Arillate(x) and Isochronal(x) -> Spinose(x)) -> therefore Spinose(anselma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Carmen is neither. Carmen is indelicate. Carmen is averse. Wendel is neither. Wendel is aryan. Wendel is averse. Wendel is monetary. All averse, monetary things are indelicate. If something is monetary then it is aryan. If Carmen is indelicate then Carmen is neither. If Carmen is monetary then Carmen is aryan. All aryan, averse things are sleeping. All neither, aryan things are monetary. If something is averse then it is monetary. If something is monetary then it is aryan. Wendel is not kind.", "logic": "\nNeither(carmen)\nIndelicate(carmen)\nAverse(carmen)\nNeither(wendel)\nAryan(wendel)\nAverse(wendel)\nMonetary(wendel)\nforall x (Averse(x) and Monetary(x) -> Indelicate(x))\nforall x (Monetary(x) -> Aryan(x))\nIndelicate(carmen) -> Neither(carmen)\nMonetary(carmen) -> Aryan(carmen)\nforall x (Aryan(x) and Averse(x) -> Sleeping(x))\nforall x (Neither(x) and Aryan(x) -> Monetary(x))\nforall x (Averse(x) -> Monetary(x))\nforall x (Monetary(x) -> Aryan(x))\n\nnot Kind(wendel)\n\nnot Kind(wendel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Robbert is unpeaceful. Robbert is loopy. Robbert is cleanly. Kellyann is unpeaceful. Kellyann is motile. Kellyann is cleanly. Kellyann is glittering. All cleanly, glittering things are loopy. If something is glittering then it is motile. If Robbert is loopy then Robbert is unpeaceful. If Robbert is glittering then Robbert is motile. All motile, cleanly things are pillared. All unpeaceful, motile things are glittering. If something is cleanly then it is glittering. If something is glittering then it is motile. Robbert is kind.", "logic": "\nUnpeaceful(robbert)\nLoopy(robbert)\nCleanly(robbert)\nUnpeaceful(kellyann)\nMotile(kellyann)\nCleanly(kellyann)\nGlittering(kellyann)\nforall x (Cleanly(x) and Glittering(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> Motile(x))\nLoopy(robbert) -> Unpeaceful(robbert)\nGlittering(robbert) -> Motile(robbert)\nforall x (Motile(x) and Cleanly(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Unpeaceful(x) and Motile(x) -> Glittering(x))\nforall x (Cleanly(x) -> Glittering(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> Motile(x))\n\nKind(robbert)\n\nKind(robbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Trisha is travelled. Trisha is predatory. Trisha is not profitless. Ellene is collegiate. Ellene is travelled. Ellene is balzacian. Ellene is dyspneal. Ellene is profitless. Natalia is predatory. Natalia is unwashed. Rough, unwashed people are balzacian. White people are collegiate. If someone is predatory then they are unwashed. All predatory people are travelled. If Ellene is predatory and Ellene is collegiate then Ellene is not profitless. If Trisha is predatory and Trisha is collegiate then Trisha is not dyspneal. If Natalia is unwashed and Natalia is profitless then Natalia is travelled. If someone is predatory and not dyspneal then they are not profitless. Natalia is predatory.", "logic": "\nTravelled(trisha)\nPredatory(trisha)\nnot Profitless(trisha)\nCollegiate(ellene)\nTravelled(ellene)\nBalzacian(ellene)\nDyspneal(ellene)\nProfitless(ellene)\nPredatory(natalia)\nUnwashed(natalia)\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and Unwashed(x) -> Balzacian(x))\nforall x (Unwashed(x) -> Collegiate(x))\nforall x (Predatory(x) -> Unwashed(x))\nforall x (Predatory(x) -> Travelled(x))\nPredatory(ellene) and Collegiate(ellene) -> not Profitless(ellene)\nPredatory(trisha) and Collegiate(trisha) -> not Dyspneal(trisha)\nUnwashed(natalia) and Profitless(natalia) -> Travelled(natalia)\nforall x (Predatory(x) and not Dyspneal(x) -> not Profitless(x))\n\nPredatory(natalia)\n\ntherefore Predatory(natalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Shirleen is human. Shirleen is stony. Shirleen is not furtive. Leonid is moderato. Leonid is human. Leonid is guarded. Leonid is moire. Leonid is furtive. Sharie is stony. Sharie is vegetative. Rough, vegetative people are guarded. White people are moderato. If someone is stony then they are vegetative. All stony people are human. If Leonid is stony and Leonid is moderato then Leonid is not furtive. If Shirleen is stony and Shirleen is moderato then Shirleen is not moire. If Sharie is vegetative and Sharie is furtive then Sharie is human. If someone is stony and not moire then they are not furtive. Sharie is not stony.", "logic": "\nHuman(shirleen)\nStony(shirleen)\nnot Furtive(shirleen)\nModerato(leonid)\nHuman(leonid)\nGuarded(leonid)\nMoire(leonid)\nFurtive(leonid)\nStony(sharie)\nVegetative(sharie)\nforall x (Moire(x) and Vegetative(x) -> Guarded(x))\nforall x (Vegetative(x) -> Moderato(x))\nforall x (Stony(x) -> Vegetative(x))\nforall x (Stony(x) -> Human(x))\nStony(leonid) and Moderato(leonid) -> not Furtive(leonid)\nStony(shirleen) and Moderato(shirleen) -> not Moire(shirleen)\nVegetative(sharie) and Furtive(sharie) -> Human(sharie)\nforall x (Stony(x) and not Moire(x) -> not Furtive(x))\n\nnot Stony(sharie)\n\ntherefore Stony(sharie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Rebeka is sibyllic. Rebeka is bodacious. Rebeka is not mounted. Marlee is drunken. Marlee is sibyllic. Marlee is equipotent. Marlee is weatherly. Marlee is mounted. Christen is bodacious. Christen is changeable. Rough, changeable people are equipotent. White people are drunken. If someone is bodacious then they are changeable. All bodacious people are sibyllic. If Marlee is bodacious and Marlee is drunken then Marlee is not mounted. If Rebeka is bodacious and Rebeka is drunken then Rebeka is not weatherly. If Christen is changeable and Christen is mounted then Christen is sibyllic. If someone is bodacious and not weatherly then they are not mounted. Christen is drunken.", "logic": "\nSibyllic(rebeka)\nBodacious(rebeka)\nnot Mounted(rebeka)\nDrunken(marlee)\nSibyllic(marlee)\nEquipotent(marlee)\nWeatherly(marlee)\nMounted(marlee)\nBodacious(christen)\nChangeable(christen)\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Changeable(x) -> Equipotent(x))\nforall x (Changeable(x) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Changeable(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Sibyllic(x))\nBodacious(marlee) and Drunken(marlee) -> not Mounted(marlee)\nBodacious(rebeka) and Drunken(rebeka) -> not Weatherly(rebeka)\nChangeable(christen) and Mounted(christen) -> Sibyllic(christen)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and not Weatherly(x) -> not Mounted(x))\n\nDrunken(christen)\n\nChangeable(christen) and forall x (Changeable(x) -> Drunken(x)) -> therefore Drunken(christen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Selestina is groveling. Selestina is oleaceous. Selestina is not sluicing. Sharl is potent. Sharl is groveling. Sharl is unforested. Sharl is hmong. Sharl is sluicing. Jolie is oleaceous. Jolie is sceptical. Rough, sceptical people are unforested. White people are potent. If someone is oleaceous then they are sceptical. All oleaceous people are groveling. If Sharl is oleaceous and Sharl is potent then Sharl is not sluicing. If Selestina is oleaceous and Selestina is potent then Selestina is not hmong. If Jolie is sceptical and Jolie is sluicing then Jolie is groveling. If someone is oleaceous and not hmong then they are not sluicing. Jolie is not potent.", "logic": "\nGroveling(selestina)\nOleaceous(selestina)\nnot Sluicing(selestina)\nPotent(sharl)\nGroveling(sharl)\nUnforested(sharl)\nHmong(sharl)\nSluicing(sharl)\nOleaceous(jolie)\nSceptical(jolie)\nforall x (Hmong(x) and Sceptical(x) -> Unforested(x))\nforall x (Sceptical(x) -> Potent(x))\nforall x (Oleaceous(x) -> Sceptical(x))\nforall x (Oleaceous(x) -> Groveling(x))\nOleaceous(sharl) and Potent(sharl) -> not Sluicing(sharl)\nOleaceous(selestina) and Potent(selestina) -> not Hmong(selestina)\nSceptical(jolie) and Sluicing(jolie) -> Groveling(jolie)\nforall x (Oleaceous(x) and not Hmong(x) -> not Sluicing(x))\n\nnot Potent(jolie)\n\nSceptical(jolie) and forall x (Sceptical(x) -> Potent(x)) -> therefore Potent(jolie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Sinead is slivery. Sinead is unowned. Sinead is not ahorseback. Carson is unfunded. Carson is slivery. Carson is pleonastic. Carson is onymous. Carson is ahorseback. Yetty is unowned. Yetty is rectal. Rough, rectal people are pleonastic. White people are unfunded. If someone is unowned then they are rectal. All unowned people are slivery. If Carson is unowned and Carson is unfunded then Carson is not ahorseback. If Sinead is unowned and Sinead is unfunded then Sinead is not onymous. If Yetty is rectal and Yetty is ahorseback then Yetty is slivery. If someone is unowned and not onymous then they are not ahorseback. Sinead is unfunded.", "logic": "\nSlivery(sinead)\nUnowned(sinead)\nnot Ahorseback(sinead)\nUnfunded(carson)\nSlivery(carson)\nPleonastic(carson)\nOnymous(carson)\nAhorseback(carson)\nUnowned(yetty)\nRectal(yetty)\nforall x (Onymous(x) and Rectal(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nforall x (Rectal(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) -> Rectal(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) -> Slivery(x))\nUnowned(carson) and Unfunded(carson) -> not Ahorseback(carson)\nUnowned(sinead) and Unfunded(sinead) -> not Onymous(sinead)\nRectal(yetty) and Ahorseback(yetty) -> Slivery(yetty)\nforall x (Unowned(x) and not Onymous(x) -> not Ahorseback(x))\n\nUnfunded(sinead)\n\nUnowned(sinead) and forall x (Unowned(x) -> Rectal(x)) -> therefore Rectal(sinead) Rectal(sinead) and forall x (Rectal(x) -> Unfunded(x)) -> therefore Unfunded(sinead)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Cooper is toned. Cooper is jolty. Cooper is not mongol. Bettie is cosmologic. Bettie is toned. Bettie is material. Bettie is stubbled. Bettie is mongol. Janeen is jolty. Janeen is through. Rough, through people are material. White people are cosmologic. If someone is jolty then they are through. All jolty people are toned. If Bettie is jolty and Bettie is cosmologic then Bettie is not mongol. If Cooper is jolty and Cooper is cosmologic then Cooper is not stubbled. If Janeen is through and Janeen is mongol then Janeen is toned. If someone is jolty and not stubbled then they are not mongol. Cooper is not cosmologic.", "logic": "\nToned(cooper)\nJolty(cooper)\nnot Mongol(cooper)\nCosmologic(bettie)\nToned(bettie)\nMaterial(bettie)\nStubbled(bettie)\nMongol(bettie)\nJolty(janeen)\nThrough(janeen)\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and Through(x) -> Material(x))\nforall x (Through(x) -> Cosmologic(x))\nforall x (Jolty(x) -> Through(x))\nforall x (Jolty(x) -> Toned(x))\nJolty(bettie) and Cosmologic(bettie) -> not Mongol(bettie)\nJolty(cooper) and Cosmologic(cooper) -> not Stubbled(cooper)\nThrough(janeen) and Mongol(janeen) -> Toned(janeen)\nforall x (Jolty(x) and not Stubbled(x) -> not Mongol(x))\n\nnot Cosmologic(cooper)\n\nJolty(cooper) and forall x (Jolty(x) -> Through(x)) -> therefore Through(cooper) Through(cooper) and forall x (Through(x) -> Cosmologic(x)) -> therefore Cosmologic(cooper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Ephram is thinkable. Ephram is erose. Ephram is not shintoist. Lilia is stray. Lilia is thinkable. Lilia is uncomely. Lilia is beneficent. Lilia is shintoist. Stephi is erose. Stephi is volatile. Rough, volatile people are uncomely. White people are stray. If someone is erose then they are volatile. All erose people are thinkable. If Lilia is erose and Lilia is stray then Lilia is not shintoist. If Ephram is erose and Ephram is stray then Ephram is not beneficent. If Stephi is volatile and Stephi is shintoist then Stephi is thinkable. If someone is erose and not beneficent then they are not shintoist. Ephram is not beneficent.", "logic": "\nThinkable(ephram)\nErose(ephram)\nnot Shintoist(ephram)\nStray(lilia)\nThinkable(lilia)\nUncomely(lilia)\nBeneficent(lilia)\nShintoist(lilia)\nErose(stephi)\nVolatile(stephi)\nforall x (Beneficent(x) and Volatile(x) -> Uncomely(x))\nforall x (Volatile(x) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) -> Volatile(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) -> Thinkable(x))\nErose(lilia) and Stray(lilia) -> not Shintoist(lilia)\nErose(ephram) and Stray(ephram) -> not Beneficent(ephram)\nVolatile(stephi) and Shintoist(stephi) -> Thinkable(stephi)\nforall x (Erose(x) and not Beneficent(x) -> not Shintoist(x))\n\nnot Beneficent(ephram)\n\nErose(ephram) and forall x (Erose(x) -> Volatile(x)) -> therefore Volatile(ephram) Volatile(ephram) and forall x (Volatile(x) -> Stray(x)) -> therefore Stray(ephram) Erose(ephram) and Stray(ephram) and Erose(ephram) and Stray(ephram) -> not Beneficent(ephram) -> therefore not Beneficent(ephram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Alan is nourishing. Alan is baptized. Alan is not bottommost. Karalynn is jaded. Karalynn is nourishing. Karalynn is saddled. Karalynn is goethean. Karalynn is bottommost. Wendi is baptized. Wendi is pectoral. Rough, pectoral people are saddled. White people are jaded. If someone is baptized then they are pectoral. All baptized people are nourishing. If Karalynn is baptized and Karalynn is jaded then Karalynn is not bottommost. If Alan is baptized and Alan is jaded then Alan is not goethean. If Wendi is pectoral and Wendi is bottommost then Wendi is nourishing. If someone is baptized and not goethean then they are not bottommost. Alan is goethean.", "logic": "\nNourishing(alan)\nBaptized(alan)\nnot Bottommost(alan)\nJaded(karalynn)\nNourishing(karalynn)\nSaddled(karalynn)\nGoethean(karalynn)\nBottommost(karalynn)\nBaptized(wendi)\nPectoral(wendi)\nforall x (Goethean(x) and Pectoral(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Baptized(x) -> Pectoral(x))\nforall x (Baptized(x) -> Nourishing(x))\nBaptized(karalynn) and Jaded(karalynn) -> not Bottommost(karalynn)\nBaptized(alan) and Jaded(alan) -> not Goethean(alan)\nPectoral(wendi) and Bottommost(wendi) -> Nourishing(wendi)\nforall x (Baptized(x) and not Goethean(x) -> not Bottommost(x))\n\nGoethean(alan)\n\nBaptized(alan) and forall x (Baptized(x) -> Pectoral(x)) -> therefore Pectoral(alan) Pectoral(alan) and forall x (Pectoral(x) -> Jaded(x)) -> therefore Jaded(alan) Baptized(alan) and Jaded(alan) and Baptized(alan) and Jaded(alan) -> not Goethean(alan) -> therefore not Goethean(alan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Carri is arced. Carri is mishnaic. Carri is not unmannered. Celie is styptic. Celie is arced. Celie is impalpable. Celie is unkeyed. Celie is unmannered. Seline is mishnaic. Seline is revolved. Rough, revolved people are impalpable. White people are styptic. If someone is mishnaic then they are revolved. All mishnaic people are arced. If Celie is mishnaic and Celie is styptic then Celie is not unmannered. If Carri is mishnaic and Carri is styptic then Carri is not unkeyed. If Seline is revolved and Seline is unmannered then Seline is arced. If someone is mishnaic and not unkeyed then they are not unmannered. Seline is not impalpable.", "logic": "\nArced(carri)\nMishnaic(carri)\nnot Unmannered(carri)\nStyptic(celie)\nArced(celie)\nImpalpable(celie)\nUnkeyed(celie)\nUnmannered(celie)\nMishnaic(seline)\nRevolved(seline)\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) and Revolved(x) -> Impalpable(x))\nforall x (Revolved(x) -> Styptic(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Arced(x))\nMishnaic(celie) and Styptic(celie) -> not Unmannered(celie)\nMishnaic(carri) and Styptic(carri) -> not Unkeyed(carri)\nRevolved(seline) and Unmannered(seline) -> Arced(seline)\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) and not Unkeyed(x) -> not Unmannered(x))\n\nnot Impalpable(seline)\n\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) and Revolved(x) -> Impalpable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Rayshell is pitiable. Rayshell is flustered. Rayshell is not adscripted. Powell is wintery. Powell is pitiable. Powell is aortal. Powell is unanimous. Powell is adscripted. Nessy is flustered. Nessy is impacted. Rough, impacted people are aortal. White people are wintery. If someone is flustered then they are impacted. All flustered people are pitiable. If Powell is flustered and Powell is wintery then Powell is not adscripted. If Rayshell is flustered and Rayshell is wintery then Rayshell is not unanimous. If Nessy is impacted and Nessy is adscripted then Nessy is pitiable. If someone is flustered and not unanimous then they are not adscripted. Rayshell is aortal.", "logic": "\nPitiable(rayshell)\nFlustered(rayshell)\nnot Adscripted(rayshell)\nWintery(powell)\nPitiable(powell)\nAortal(powell)\nUnanimous(powell)\nAdscripted(powell)\nFlustered(nessy)\nImpacted(nessy)\nforall x (Unanimous(x) and Impacted(x) -> Aortal(x))\nforall x (Impacted(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Impacted(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nFlustered(powell) and Wintery(powell) -> not Adscripted(powell)\nFlustered(rayshell) and Wintery(rayshell) -> not Unanimous(rayshell)\nImpacted(nessy) and Adscripted(nessy) -> Pitiable(nessy)\nforall x (Flustered(x) and not Unanimous(x) -> not Adscripted(x))\n\nAortal(rayshell)\n\nforall x (Unanimous(x) and Impacted(x) -> Aortal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Phelia is gimbaled. Phelia is sylvan. Phelia is not saintly. Gayla is slighting. Gayla is gimbaled. Gayla is beetle. Gayla is laminar. Gayla is saintly. Odilia is sylvan. Odilia is bulbaceous. Rough, bulbaceous people are beetle. White people are slighting. If someone is sylvan then they are bulbaceous. All sylvan people are gimbaled. If Gayla is sylvan and Gayla is slighting then Gayla is not saintly. If Phelia is sylvan and Phelia is slighting then Phelia is not laminar. If Odilia is bulbaceous and Odilia is saintly then Odilia is gimbaled. If someone is sylvan and not laminar then they are not saintly. Gayla is not bulbaceous.", "logic": "\nGimbaled(phelia)\nSylvan(phelia)\nnot Saintly(phelia)\nSlighting(gayla)\nGimbaled(gayla)\nBeetle(gayla)\nLaminar(gayla)\nSaintly(gayla)\nSylvan(odilia)\nBulbaceous(odilia)\nforall x (Laminar(x) and Bulbaceous(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Slighting(x))\nforall x (Sylvan(x) -> Bulbaceous(x))\nforall x (Sylvan(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nSylvan(gayla) and Slighting(gayla) -> not Saintly(gayla)\nSylvan(phelia) and Slighting(phelia) -> not Laminar(phelia)\nBulbaceous(odilia) and Saintly(odilia) -> Gimbaled(odilia)\nforall x (Sylvan(x) and not Laminar(x) -> not Saintly(x))\n\nnot Bulbaceous(gayla)\n\nforall x (Sylvan(x) -> Bulbaceous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Clarita is jacobean. Clarita is motorless. Clarita is not unrested. Lynnell is myeloid. Lynnell is jacobean. Lynnell is bursal. Lynnell is bubbly. Lynnell is unrested. Sharona is motorless. Sharona is slatey. Rough, slatey people are bursal. White people are myeloid. If someone is motorless then they are slatey. All motorless people are jacobean. If Lynnell is motorless and Lynnell is myeloid then Lynnell is not unrested. If Clarita is motorless and Clarita is myeloid then Clarita is not bubbly. If Sharona is slatey and Sharona is unrested then Sharona is jacobean. If someone is motorless and not bubbly then they are not unrested. Sharona is unrested.", "logic": "\nJacobean(clarita)\nMotorless(clarita)\nnot Unrested(clarita)\nMyeloid(lynnell)\nJacobean(lynnell)\nBursal(lynnell)\nBubbly(lynnell)\nUnrested(lynnell)\nMotorless(sharona)\nSlatey(sharona)\nforall x (Bubbly(x) and Slatey(x) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Motorless(x) -> Slatey(x))\nforall x (Motorless(x) -> Jacobean(x))\nMotorless(lynnell) and Myeloid(lynnell) -> not Unrested(lynnell)\nMotorless(clarita) and Myeloid(clarita) -> not Bubbly(clarita)\nSlatey(sharona) and Unrested(sharona) -> Jacobean(sharona)\nforall x (Motorless(x) and not Bubbly(x) -> not Unrested(x))\n\nUnrested(sharona)\n\nUnrested(sharona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Konrad is trilobate. Konrad is treasonous. Konrad is not ultimo. Malinda is basifixed. Malinda is trilobate. Malinda is cloying. Malinda is flavorsome. Malinda is ultimo. Dorit is treasonous. Dorit is univocal. Rough, univocal people are cloying. White people are basifixed. If someone is treasonous then they are univocal. All treasonous people are trilobate. If Malinda is treasonous and Malinda is basifixed then Malinda is not ultimo. If Konrad is treasonous and Konrad is basifixed then Konrad is not flavorsome. If Dorit is univocal and Dorit is ultimo then Dorit is trilobate. If someone is treasonous and not flavorsome then they are not ultimo. Dorit is not flavorsome.", "logic": "\nTrilobate(konrad)\nTreasonous(konrad)\nnot Ultimo(konrad)\nBasifixed(malinda)\nTrilobate(malinda)\nCloying(malinda)\nFlavorsome(malinda)\nUltimo(malinda)\nTreasonous(dorit)\nUnivocal(dorit)\nforall x (Flavorsome(x) and Univocal(x) -> Cloying(x))\nforall x (Univocal(x) -> Basifixed(x))\nforall x (Treasonous(x) -> Univocal(x))\nforall x (Treasonous(x) -> Trilobate(x))\nTreasonous(malinda) and Basifixed(malinda) -> not Ultimo(malinda)\nTreasonous(konrad) and Basifixed(konrad) -> not Flavorsome(konrad)\nUnivocal(dorit) and Ultimo(dorit) -> Trilobate(dorit)\nforall x (Treasonous(x) and not Flavorsome(x) -> not Ultimo(x))\n\nnot Flavorsome(dorit)\n\nnot Flavorsome(dorit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Stephanie is columnlike. Stephanie is unsmiling. Stephanie is not entire. Koressa is deictic. Koressa is columnlike. Koressa is xenophobic. Koressa is acold. Koressa is entire. Ermina is unsmiling. Ermina is catarrhine. Rough, catarrhine people are xenophobic. White people are deictic. If someone is unsmiling then they are catarrhine. All unsmiling people are columnlike. If Koressa is unsmiling and Koressa is deictic then Koressa is not entire. If Stephanie is unsmiling and Stephanie is deictic then Stephanie is not acold. If Ermina is catarrhine and Ermina is entire then Ermina is columnlike. If someone is unsmiling and not acold then they are not entire. Koressa is unsmiling.", "logic": "\nColumnlike(stephanie)\nUnsmiling(stephanie)\nnot Entire(stephanie)\nDeictic(koressa)\nColumnlike(koressa)\nXenophobic(koressa)\nAcold(koressa)\nEntire(koressa)\nUnsmiling(ermina)\nCatarrhine(ermina)\nforall x (Acold(x) and Catarrhine(x) -> Xenophobic(x))\nforall x (Catarrhine(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Columnlike(x))\nUnsmiling(koressa) and Deictic(koressa) -> not Entire(koressa)\nUnsmiling(stephanie) and Deictic(stephanie) -> not Acold(stephanie)\nCatarrhine(ermina) and Entire(ermina) -> Columnlike(ermina)\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and not Acold(x) -> not Entire(x))\n\nUnsmiling(koressa)\n\nUnsmiling(koressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Edward is proximal. Edward is axile. Jacinda is solemn. Jacinda is pellucid. Libbey is robust. Libbey is not axile. Libbey is pellucid. If Edward is solemn and Edward is proximal then Edward is raptorial. If something is robust and proximal then it is not vestigial. All axile things are vestigial. If something is pellucid and not axile then it is raptorial. All solemn things are robust. Kind things are proximal. All pellucid, raptorial things are proximal. All solemn things are pellucid. Jacinda is solemn.", "logic": "\nProximal(edward)\nAxile(edward)\nSolemn(jacinda)\nPellucid(jacinda)\nRobust(libbey)\nnot Axile(libbey)\nPellucid(libbey)\nSolemn(edward) and Proximal(edward) -> Raptorial(edward)\nforall x (Robust(x) and Proximal(x) -> not Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) and not Axile(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Robust(x))\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> Proximal(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) and Raptorial(x) -> Proximal(x))\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Pellucid(x))\n\nSolemn(jacinda)\n\ntherefore Solemn(jacinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Allyce is flagellate. Allyce is important. Judi is afflicted. Judi is lengthwise. Geeta is soundproof. Geeta is not important. Geeta is lengthwise. If Allyce is afflicted and Allyce is flagellate then Allyce is trilingual. If something is soundproof and flagellate then it is not spotted. All important things are spotted. If something is lengthwise and not important then it is trilingual. All afflicted things are soundproof. Kind things are flagellate. All lengthwise, trilingual things are flagellate. All afflicted things are lengthwise. Allyce is not important.", "logic": "\nFlagellate(allyce)\nImportant(allyce)\nAfflicted(judi)\nLengthwise(judi)\nSoundproof(geeta)\nnot Important(geeta)\nLengthwise(geeta)\nAfflicted(allyce) and Flagellate(allyce) -> Trilingual(allyce)\nforall x (Soundproof(x) and Flagellate(x) -> not Spotted(x))\nforall x (Important(x) -> Spotted(x))\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) and not Important(x) -> Trilingual(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Soundproof(x))\nforall x (Spotted(x) -> Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) and Trilingual(x) -> Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\n\nnot Important(allyce)\n\ntherefore Important(allyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Janka is arguable. Janka is bedfast. Eduard is urbanized. Eduard is ammoniacal. Rubia is effete. Rubia is not bedfast. Rubia is ammoniacal. If Janka is urbanized and Janka is arguable then Janka is reticent. If something is effete and arguable then it is not dioecian. All bedfast things are dioecian. If something is ammoniacal and not bedfast then it is reticent. All urbanized things are effete. Kind things are arguable. All ammoniacal, reticent things are arguable. All urbanized things are ammoniacal. Rubia is reticent.", "logic": "\nArguable(janka)\nBedfast(janka)\nUrbanized(eduard)\nAmmoniacal(eduard)\nEffete(rubia)\nnot Bedfast(rubia)\nAmmoniacal(rubia)\nUrbanized(janka) and Arguable(janka) -> Reticent(janka)\nforall x (Effete(x) and Arguable(x) -> not Dioecian(x))\nforall x (Bedfast(x) -> Dioecian(x))\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) and not Bedfast(x) -> Reticent(x))\nforall x (Urbanized(x) -> Effete(x))\nforall x (Dioecian(x) -> Arguable(x))\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) and Reticent(x) -> Arguable(x))\nforall x (Urbanized(x) -> Ammoniacal(x))\n\nReticent(rubia)\n\nAmmoniacal(rubia) and not Bedfast(rubia) and forall x (Ammoniacal(x) and not Bedfast(x) -> Reticent(x)) -> therefore Reticent(rubia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Xylia is booming. Xylia is gleaming. Alec is bardic. Alec is protean. Lefty is phlegmatic. Lefty is not gleaming. Lefty is protean. If Xylia is bardic and Xylia is booming then Xylia is univalve. If something is phlegmatic and booming then it is not conjugated. All gleaming things are conjugated. If something is protean and not gleaming then it is univalve. All bardic things are phlegmatic. Kind things are booming. All protean, univalve things are booming. All bardic things are protean. Xylia is not conjugated.", "logic": "\nBooming(xylia)\nGleaming(xylia)\nBardic(alec)\nProtean(alec)\nPhlegmatic(lefty)\nnot Gleaming(lefty)\nProtean(lefty)\nBardic(xylia) and Booming(xylia) -> Univalve(xylia)\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) and Booming(x) -> not Conjugated(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Conjugated(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) and not Gleaming(x) -> Univalve(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Booming(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) and Univalve(x) -> Booming(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) -> Protean(x))\n\nnot Conjugated(xylia)\n\nGleaming(xylia) and forall x (Gleaming(x) -> Conjugated(x)) -> therefore Conjugated(xylia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Kirstyn is burundi. Kirstyn is sinful. Selma is involved. Selma is semiweekly. Kat is cymose. Kat is not sinful. Kat is semiweekly. If Kirstyn is involved and Kirstyn is burundi then Kirstyn is aecial. If something is cymose and burundi then it is not gimpy. All sinful things are gimpy. If something is semiweekly and not sinful then it is aecial. All involved things are cymose. Kind things are burundi. All semiweekly, aecial things are burundi. All involved things are semiweekly. Kat is burundi.", "logic": "\nBurundi(kirstyn)\nSinful(kirstyn)\nInvolved(selma)\nSemiweekly(selma)\nCymose(kat)\nnot Sinful(kat)\nSemiweekly(kat)\nInvolved(kirstyn) and Burundi(kirstyn) -> Aecial(kirstyn)\nforall x (Cymose(x) and Burundi(x) -> not Gimpy(x))\nforall x (Sinful(x) -> Gimpy(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) and not Sinful(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Gimpy(x) -> Burundi(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) and Aecial(x) -> Burundi(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) -> Semiweekly(x))\n\nBurundi(kat)\n\nSemiweekly(kat) and not Sinful(kat) and forall x (Semiweekly(x) and not Sinful(x) -> Aecial(x)) -> therefore Aecial(kat) Semiweekly(kat) and Aecial(kat) and forall x (Semiweekly(x) and Aecial(x) -> Burundi(x)) -> therefore Burundi(kat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Batsheva is ultimo. Batsheva is departed. Nels is priestlike. Nels is rakish. Abdul is styptic. Abdul is not departed. Abdul is rakish. If Batsheva is priestlike and Batsheva is ultimo then Batsheva is aggregate. If something is styptic and ultimo then it is not long. All departed things are long. If something is rakish and not departed then it is aggregate. All priestlike things are styptic. Kind things are ultimo. All rakish, aggregate things are ultimo. All priestlike things are rakish. Abdul is not ultimo.", "logic": "\nUltimo(batsheva)\nDeparted(batsheva)\nPriestlike(nels)\nRakish(nels)\nStyptic(abdul)\nnot Departed(abdul)\nRakish(abdul)\nPriestlike(batsheva) and Ultimo(batsheva) -> Aggregate(batsheva)\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Ultimo(x) -> not Long(x))\nforall x (Departed(x) -> Long(x))\nforall x (Rakish(x) and not Departed(x) -> Aggregate(x))\nforall x (Priestlike(x) -> Styptic(x))\nforall x (Long(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nforall x (Rakish(x) and Aggregate(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nforall x (Priestlike(x) -> Rakish(x))\n\nnot Ultimo(abdul)\n\nRakish(abdul) and not Departed(abdul) and forall x (Rakish(x) and not Departed(x) -> Aggregate(x)) -> therefore Aggregate(abdul) Rakish(abdul) and Aggregate(abdul) and forall x (Rakish(x) and Aggregate(x) -> Ultimo(x)) -> therefore Ultimo(abdul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Nester is fretful. Nester is innate. Les is armless. Les is unthawed. Baldwin is utilised. Baldwin is not innate. Baldwin is unthawed. If Nester is armless and Nester is fretful then Nester is asymmetric. If something is utilised and fretful then it is not hollywood. All innate things are hollywood. If something is unthawed and not innate then it is asymmetric. All armless things are utilised. Kind things are fretful. All unthawed, asymmetric things are fretful. All armless things are unthawed. Baldwin is not hollywood.", "logic": "\nFretful(nester)\nInnate(nester)\nArmless(les)\nUnthawed(les)\nUtilised(baldwin)\nnot Innate(baldwin)\nUnthawed(baldwin)\nArmless(nester) and Fretful(nester) -> Asymmetric(nester)\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Fretful(x) -> not Hollywood(x))\nforall x (Innate(x) -> Hollywood(x))\nforall x (Unthawed(x) and not Innate(x) -> Asymmetric(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) -> Utilised(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) -> Fretful(x))\nforall x (Unthawed(x) and Asymmetric(x) -> Fretful(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) -> Unthawed(x))\n\nnot Hollywood(baldwin)\n\nUnthawed(baldwin) and not Innate(baldwin) and forall x (Unthawed(x) and not Innate(x) -> Asymmetric(x)) -> therefore Asymmetric(baldwin) Unthawed(baldwin) and Asymmetric(baldwin) and forall x (Unthawed(x) and Asymmetric(x) -> Fretful(x)) -> therefore Fretful(baldwin) Utilised(baldwin) and Fretful(baldwin) and forall x (Utilised(x) and Fretful(x) -> not Hollywood(x)) -> therefore not Hollywood(baldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Carmelle is capitalist. Carmelle is glassed. Minta is anaclinal. Minta is picayune. Babara is blear. Babara is not glassed. Babara is picayune. If Carmelle is anaclinal and Carmelle is capitalist then Carmelle is empurpled. If something is blear and capitalist then it is not toadyish. All glassed things are toadyish. If something is picayune and not glassed then it is empurpled. All anaclinal things are blear. Kind things are capitalist. All picayune, empurpled things are capitalist. All anaclinal things are picayune. Babara is toadyish.", "logic": "\nCapitalist(carmelle)\nGlassed(carmelle)\nAnaclinal(minta)\nPicayune(minta)\nBlear(babara)\nnot Glassed(babara)\nPicayune(babara)\nAnaclinal(carmelle) and Capitalist(carmelle) -> Empurpled(carmelle)\nforall x (Blear(x) and Capitalist(x) -> not Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Picayune(x) and not Glassed(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) -> Blear(x))\nforall x (Toadyish(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Picayune(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) -> Picayune(x))\n\nToadyish(babara)\n\nPicayune(babara) and not Glassed(babara) and forall x (Picayune(x) and not Glassed(x) -> Empurpled(x)) -> therefore Empurpled(babara) Picayune(babara) and Empurpled(babara) and forall x (Picayune(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Capitalist(x)) -> therefore Capitalist(babara) Blear(babara) and Capitalist(babara) and forall x (Blear(x) and Capitalist(x) -> not Toadyish(x)) -> therefore not Toadyish(babara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Gae is edentulous. Gae is chilling. Margie is tannish. Margie is unlimited. Sarita is favorable. Sarita is not chilling. Sarita is unlimited. If Gae is tannish and Gae is edentulous then Gae is unneurotic. If something is favorable and edentulous then it is not bovine. All chilling things are bovine. If something is unlimited and not chilling then it is unneurotic. All tannish things are favorable. Kind things are edentulous. All unlimited, unneurotic things are edentulous. All tannish things are unlimited. Gae is not favorable.", "logic": "\nEdentulous(gae)\nChilling(gae)\nTannish(margie)\nUnlimited(margie)\nFavorable(sarita)\nnot Chilling(sarita)\nUnlimited(sarita)\nTannish(gae) and Edentulous(gae) -> Unneurotic(gae)\nforall x (Favorable(x) and Edentulous(x) -> not Bovine(x))\nforall x (Chilling(x) -> Bovine(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and not Chilling(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Favorable(x))\nforall x (Bovine(x) -> Edentulous(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Unneurotic(x) -> Edentulous(x))\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Unlimited(x))\n\nnot Favorable(gae)\n\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Favorable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Perry is limacine. Perry is epicurean. Merrill is uncrossed. Merrill is prospering. Osborn is bosomed. Osborn is not epicurean. Osborn is prospering. If Perry is uncrossed and Perry is limacine then Perry is expressive. If something is bosomed and limacine then it is not reluctant. All epicurean things are reluctant. If something is prospering and not epicurean then it is expressive. All uncrossed things are bosomed. Kind things are limacine. All prospering, expressive things are limacine. All uncrossed things are prospering. Merrill is limacine.", "logic": "\nLimacine(perry)\nEpicurean(perry)\nUncrossed(merrill)\nProspering(merrill)\nBosomed(osborn)\nnot Epicurean(osborn)\nProspering(osborn)\nUncrossed(perry) and Limacine(perry) -> Expressive(perry)\nforall x (Bosomed(x) and Limacine(x) -> not Reluctant(x))\nforall x (Epicurean(x) -> Reluctant(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) and not Epicurean(x) -> Expressive(x))\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Reluctant(x) -> Limacine(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) and Expressive(x) -> Limacine(x))\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) -> Prospering(x))\n\nLimacine(merrill)\n\nforall x (Reluctant(x) -> Limacine(x)) <- forall x (Epicurean(x) -> Reluctant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Lulu is unpassable. Lulu is juvenile. Rosetta is aplacental. Rosetta is bifacial. Easton is persistent. Easton is not juvenile. Easton is bifacial. If Lulu is aplacental and Lulu is unpassable then Lulu is straw. If something is persistent and unpassable then it is not diadromous. All juvenile things are diadromous. If something is bifacial and not juvenile then it is straw. All aplacental things are persistent. Kind things are unpassable. All bifacial, straw things are unpassable. All aplacental things are bifacial. Rosetta is not straw.", "logic": "\nUnpassable(lulu)\nJuvenile(lulu)\nAplacental(rosetta)\nBifacial(rosetta)\nPersistent(easton)\nnot Juvenile(easton)\nBifacial(easton)\nAplacental(lulu) and Unpassable(lulu) -> Straw(lulu)\nforall x (Persistent(x) and Unpassable(x) -> not Diadromous(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) -> Diadromous(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and not Juvenile(x) -> Straw(x))\nforall x (Aplacental(x) -> Persistent(x))\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Straw(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Aplacental(x) -> Bifacial(x))\n\nnot Straw(rosetta)\n\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and not Juvenile(x) -> Straw(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Jobie is bulky. Jobie is starting. Rozele is leftish. Rozele is cormose. Richardo is unliveried. Richardo is not starting. Richardo is cormose. If Jobie is leftish and Jobie is bulky then Jobie is resilient. If something is unliveried and bulky then it is not pursued. All starting things are pursued. If something is cormose and not starting then it is resilient. All leftish things are unliveried. Kind things are bulky. All cormose, resilient things are bulky. All leftish things are cormose. Jobie is resilient.", "logic": "\nBulky(jobie)\nStarting(jobie)\nLeftish(rozele)\nCormose(rozele)\nUnliveried(richardo)\nnot Starting(richardo)\nCormose(richardo)\nLeftish(jobie) and Bulky(jobie) -> Resilient(jobie)\nforall x (Unliveried(x) and Bulky(x) -> not Pursued(x))\nforall x (Starting(x) -> Pursued(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) and not Starting(x) -> Resilient(x))\nforall x (Leftish(x) -> Unliveried(x))\nforall x (Pursued(x) -> Bulky(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) and Resilient(x) -> Bulky(x))\nforall x (Leftish(x) -> Cormose(x))\n\nResilient(jobie)\n\nLeftish(jobie) and Bulky(jobie) -> Resilient(jobie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Lucian is thickset. Lucian is grueling. Sherri is addled. Sherri is politic. Alexa is gangly. Alexa is not grueling. Alexa is politic. If Lucian is addled and Lucian is thickset then Lucian is changeful. If something is gangly and thickset then it is not linnean. All grueling things are linnean. If something is politic and not grueling then it is changeful. All addled things are gangly. Kind things are thickset. All politic, changeful things are thickset. All addled things are politic. Sherri is not grueling.", "logic": "\nThickset(lucian)\nGrueling(lucian)\nAddled(sherri)\nPolitic(sherri)\nGangly(alexa)\nnot Grueling(alexa)\nPolitic(alexa)\nAddled(lucian) and Thickset(lucian) -> Changeful(lucian)\nforall x (Gangly(x) and Thickset(x) -> not Linnean(x))\nforall x (Grueling(x) -> Linnean(x))\nforall x (Politic(x) and not Grueling(x) -> Changeful(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) -> Thickset(x))\nforall x (Politic(x) and Changeful(x) -> Thickset(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) -> Politic(x))\n\nnot Grueling(sherri)\n\nnot Grueling(sherri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Gonzales is vented. Gonzales is agonizing. Jessy is obliged. Jessy is contented. Katti is unguided. Katti is not agonizing. Katti is contented. If Gonzales is obliged and Gonzales is vented then Gonzales is mitigated. If something is unguided and vented then it is not perinasal. All agonizing things are perinasal. If something is contented and not agonizing then it is mitigated. All obliged things are unguided. Kind things are vented. All contented, mitigated things are vented. All obliged things are contented. Katti is obliged.", "logic": "\nVented(gonzales)\nAgonizing(gonzales)\nObliged(jessy)\nContented(jessy)\nUnguided(katti)\nnot Agonizing(katti)\nContented(katti)\nObliged(gonzales) and Vented(gonzales) -> Mitigated(gonzales)\nforall x (Unguided(x) and Vented(x) -> not Perinasal(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) -> Perinasal(x))\nforall x (Contented(x) and not Agonizing(x) -> Mitigated(x))\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Unguided(x))\nforall x (Perinasal(x) -> Vented(x))\nforall x (Contented(x) and Mitigated(x) -> Vented(x))\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Contented(x))\n\nObliged(katti)\n\nObliged(katti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Julianna is omniscient. Julianna is analog. Julianna is humongous. Julianna is accepted. Julianna is piscatory. Adey is polyatomic. Adey is omniscient. Adey is analog. Adey is piscatory. Jeana is polyatomic. Jeana is omniscient. Jeana is analog. Jeana is dural. Jeana is humongous. Carly is polyatomic. If Carly is polyatomic then Carly is accepted. If someone is accepted then they are omniscient. If someone is accepted and omniscient then they are analog. Adey is omniscient.", "logic": "\nOmniscient(julianna)\nAnalog(julianna)\nHumongous(julianna)\nAccepted(julianna)\nPiscatory(julianna)\nPolyatomic(adey)\nOmniscient(adey)\nAnalog(adey)\nPiscatory(adey)\nPolyatomic(jeana)\nOmniscient(jeana)\nAnalog(jeana)\nDural(jeana)\nHumongous(jeana)\nPolyatomic(carly)\nPolyatomic(carly) -> Accepted(carly)\nforall x (Accepted(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Accepted(x) and Omniscient(x) -> Analog(x))\n\nOmniscient(adey)\n\ntherefore Omniscient(adey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Errol is expansive. Errol is shared. Errol is deltoid. Errol is ninety. Errol is acneiform. Aurilia is delicate. Aurilia is expansive. Aurilia is shared. Aurilia is acneiform. Retha is delicate. Retha is expansive. Retha is shared. Retha is furled. Retha is deltoid. Durant is delicate. If Durant is delicate then Durant is ninety. If someone is ninety then they are expansive. If someone is ninety and expansive then they are shared. Aurilia is not shared.", "logic": "\nExpansive(errol)\nShared(errol)\nDeltoid(errol)\nNinety(errol)\nAcneiform(errol)\nDelicate(aurilia)\nExpansive(aurilia)\nShared(aurilia)\nAcneiform(aurilia)\nDelicate(retha)\nExpansive(retha)\nShared(retha)\nFurled(retha)\nDeltoid(retha)\nDelicate(durant)\nDelicate(durant) -> Ninety(durant)\nforall x (Ninety(x) -> Expansive(x))\nforall x (Ninety(x) and Expansive(x) -> Shared(x))\n\nnot Shared(aurilia)\n\ntherefore Shared(aurilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Lenka is benthonic. Lenka is passionate. Lenka is opposing. Lenka is dauntless. Lenka is stylized. Cristy is lxxi. Cristy is benthonic. Cristy is passionate. Cristy is stylized. Enoch is lxxi. Enoch is benthonic. Enoch is passionate. Enoch is brushlike. Enoch is opposing. Welbie is lxxi. If Welbie is lxxi then Welbie is dauntless. If someone is dauntless then they are benthonic. If someone is dauntless and benthonic then they are passionate. Welbie is dauntless.", "logic": "\nBenthonic(lenka)\nPassionate(lenka)\nOpposing(lenka)\nDauntless(lenka)\nStylized(lenka)\nLxxi(cristy)\nBenthonic(cristy)\nPassionate(cristy)\nStylized(cristy)\nLxxi(enoch)\nBenthonic(enoch)\nPassionate(enoch)\nBrushlike(enoch)\nOpposing(enoch)\nLxxi(welbie)\nLxxi(welbie) -> Dauntless(welbie)\nforall x (Dauntless(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nforall x (Dauntless(x) and Benthonic(x) -> Passionate(x))\n\nDauntless(welbie)\n\nLxxi(welbie) and Lxxi(welbie) -> Dauntless(welbie) -> therefore Dauntless(welbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Apollo is yuman. Apollo is less. Apollo is fatal. Apollo is prodromal. Apollo is magic. Thor is slippy. Thor is yuman. Thor is less. Thor is magic. Robinia is slippy. Robinia is yuman. Robinia is less. Robinia is arrogant. Robinia is fatal. Shaughn is slippy. If Shaughn is slippy then Shaughn is prodromal. If someone is prodromal then they are yuman. If someone is prodromal and yuman then they are less. Shaughn is not prodromal.", "logic": "\nYuman(apollo)\nLess(apollo)\nFatal(apollo)\nProdromal(apollo)\nMagic(apollo)\nSlippy(thor)\nYuman(thor)\nLess(thor)\nMagic(thor)\nSlippy(robinia)\nYuman(robinia)\nLess(robinia)\nArrogant(robinia)\nFatal(robinia)\nSlippy(shaughn)\nSlippy(shaughn) -> Prodromal(shaughn)\nforall x (Prodromal(x) -> Yuman(x))\nforall x (Prodromal(x) and Yuman(x) -> Less(x))\n\nnot Prodromal(shaughn)\n\nSlippy(shaughn) and Slippy(shaughn) -> Prodromal(shaughn) -> therefore Prodromal(shaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Mahmud is eightieth. Mahmud is spry. Mahmud is northwest. Mahmud is smoggy. Mahmud is alcoholic. Price is probative. Price is eightieth. Price is spry. Price is alcoholic. Vite is probative. Vite is eightieth. Vite is spry. Vite is semiannual. Vite is northwest. Carie is probative. If Carie is probative then Carie is smoggy. If someone is smoggy then they are eightieth. If someone is smoggy and eightieth then they are spry. Carie is eightieth.", "logic": "\nEightieth(mahmud)\nSpry(mahmud)\nNorthwest(mahmud)\nSmoggy(mahmud)\nAlcoholic(mahmud)\nProbative(price)\nEightieth(price)\nSpry(price)\nAlcoholic(price)\nProbative(vite)\nEightieth(vite)\nSpry(vite)\nSemiannual(vite)\nNorthwest(vite)\nProbative(carie)\nProbative(carie) -> Smoggy(carie)\nforall x (Smoggy(x) -> Eightieth(x))\nforall x (Smoggy(x) and Eightieth(x) -> Spry(x))\n\nEightieth(carie)\n\nProbative(carie) and Probative(carie) -> Smoggy(carie) -> therefore Smoggy(carie) Smoggy(carie) and forall x (Smoggy(x) -> Eightieth(x)) -> therefore Eightieth(carie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Iago is dolorous. Iago is jungly. Iago is streaky. Iago is cantonal. Iago is washed. Vinny is handed. Vinny is dolorous. Vinny is jungly. Vinny is washed. Jewel is handed. Jewel is dolorous. Jewel is jungly. Jewel is tibetan. Jewel is streaky. Riccardo is handed. If Riccardo is handed then Riccardo is cantonal. If someone is cantonal then they are dolorous. If someone is cantonal and dolorous then they are jungly. Riccardo is not dolorous.", "logic": "\nDolorous(iago)\nJungly(iago)\nStreaky(iago)\nCantonal(iago)\nWashed(iago)\nHanded(vinny)\nDolorous(vinny)\nJungly(vinny)\nWashed(vinny)\nHanded(jewel)\nDolorous(jewel)\nJungly(jewel)\nTibetan(jewel)\nStreaky(jewel)\nHanded(riccardo)\nHanded(riccardo) -> Cantonal(riccardo)\nforall x (Cantonal(x) -> Dolorous(x))\nforall x (Cantonal(x) and Dolorous(x) -> Jungly(x))\n\nnot Dolorous(riccardo)\n\nHanded(riccardo) and Handed(riccardo) -> Cantonal(riccardo) -> therefore Cantonal(riccardo) Cantonal(riccardo) and forall x (Cantonal(x) -> Dolorous(x)) -> therefore Dolorous(riccardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Tobie is barefaced. Tobie is aboulic. Tobie is interbred. Tobie is frothy. Tobie is allelic. Sheree is flippant. Sheree is barefaced. Sheree is aboulic. Sheree is allelic. Leif is flippant. Leif is barefaced. Leif is aboulic. Leif is frigorific. Leif is interbred. Theada is flippant. If Theada is flippant then Theada is frothy. If someone is frothy then they are barefaced. If someone is frothy and barefaced then they are aboulic. Theada is aboulic.", "logic": "\nBarefaced(tobie)\nAboulic(tobie)\nInterbred(tobie)\nFrothy(tobie)\nAllelic(tobie)\nFlippant(sheree)\nBarefaced(sheree)\nAboulic(sheree)\nAllelic(sheree)\nFlippant(leif)\nBarefaced(leif)\nAboulic(leif)\nFrigorific(leif)\nInterbred(leif)\nFlippant(theada)\nFlippant(theada) -> Frothy(theada)\nforall x (Frothy(x) -> Barefaced(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) and Barefaced(x) -> Aboulic(x))\n\nAboulic(theada)\n\nFlippant(theada) and Flippant(theada) -> Frothy(theada) -> therefore Frothy(theada) Flippant(theada) and Flippant(theada) -> Frothy(theada) -> therefore Frothy(theada) Frothy(theada) and forall x (Frothy(x) -> Barefaced(x)) -> therefore Barefaced(theada) Frothy(theada) and Barefaced(theada) and forall x (Frothy(x) and Barefaced(x) -> Aboulic(x)) -> therefore Aboulic(theada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Edyth is arbitrable. Edyth is starved. Edyth is mendicant. Edyth is antheral. Edyth is unmade. Kata is olive. Kata is arbitrable. Kata is starved. Kata is unmade. Zabrina is olive. Zabrina is arbitrable. Zabrina is starved. Zabrina is mormon. Zabrina is mendicant. Oral is olive. If Oral is olive then Oral is antheral. If someone is antheral then they are arbitrable. If someone is antheral and arbitrable then they are starved. Oral is not starved.", "logic": "\nArbitrable(edyth)\nStarved(edyth)\nMendicant(edyth)\nAntheral(edyth)\nUnmade(edyth)\nOlive(kata)\nArbitrable(kata)\nStarved(kata)\nUnmade(kata)\nOlive(zabrina)\nArbitrable(zabrina)\nStarved(zabrina)\nMormon(zabrina)\nMendicant(zabrina)\nOlive(oral)\nOlive(oral) -> Antheral(oral)\nforall x (Antheral(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Antheral(x) and Arbitrable(x) -> Starved(x))\n\nnot Starved(oral)\n\nOlive(oral) and Olive(oral) -> Antheral(oral) -> therefore Antheral(oral) Olive(oral) and Olive(oral) -> Antheral(oral) -> therefore Antheral(oral) Antheral(oral) and forall x (Antheral(x) -> Arbitrable(x)) -> therefore Arbitrable(oral) Antheral(oral) and Arbitrable(oral) and forall x (Antheral(x) and Arbitrable(x) -> Starved(x)) -> therefore Starved(oral)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Marijo is roomy. Marijo is bittie. Marijo is daedal. Marijo is unrewarded. Marijo is semiotic. Brent is diverting. Brent is roomy. Brent is bittie. Brent is semiotic. Kaylyn is diverting. Kaylyn is roomy. Kaylyn is bittie. Kaylyn is biaxate. Kaylyn is daedal. Karee is diverting. If Karee is diverting then Karee is unrewarded. If someone is unrewarded then they are roomy. If someone is unrewarded and roomy then they are bittie. Karee is not semiotic.", "logic": "\nRoomy(marijo)\nBittie(marijo)\nDaedal(marijo)\nUnrewarded(marijo)\nSemiotic(marijo)\nDiverting(brent)\nRoomy(brent)\nBittie(brent)\nSemiotic(brent)\nDiverting(kaylyn)\nRoomy(kaylyn)\nBittie(kaylyn)\nBiaxate(kaylyn)\nDaedal(kaylyn)\nDiverting(karee)\nDiverting(karee) -> Unrewarded(karee)\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Roomy(x))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) and Roomy(x) -> Bittie(x))\n\nnot Semiotic(karee)\n\nnot Semiotic(karee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Thorndike is ranked. Thorndike is specked. Thorndike is strangled. Thorndike is narrative. Thorndike is ammonitic. Wilbert is mordacious. Wilbert is ranked. Wilbert is specked. Wilbert is ammonitic. Brooks is mordacious. Brooks is ranked. Brooks is specked. Brooks is areolar. Brooks is strangled. Rora is mordacious. If Rora is mordacious then Rora is narrative. If someone is narrative then they are ranked. If someone is narrative and ranked then they are specked. Wilbert is areolar.", "logic": "\nRanked(thorndike)\nSpecked(thorndike)\nStrangled(thorndike)\nNarrative(thorndike)\nAmmonitic(thorndike)\nMordacious(wilbert)\nRanked(wilbert)\nSpecked(wilbert)\nAmmonitic(wilbert)\nMordacious(brooks)\nRanked(brooks)\nSpecked(brooks)\nAreolar(brooks)\nStrangled(brooks)\nMordacious(rora)\nMordacious(rora) -> Narrative(rora)\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Ranked(x))\nforall x (Narrative(x) and Ranked(x) -> Specked(x))\n\nAreolar(wilbert)\n\nAreolar(wilbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Flo is aurorean. Flo is arcuate. Flo is reticent. Flo is cracking. Flo is bronze. Cami is wealthy. Cami is aurorean. Cami is arcuate. Cami is bronze. Berte is wealthy. Berte is aurorean. Berte is arcuate. Berte is navicular. Berte is reticent. Torr is wealthy. If Torr is wealthy then Torr is cracking. If someone is cracking then they are aurorean. If someone is cracking and aurorean then they are arcuate. Berte is not bronze.", "logic": "\nAurorean(flo)\nArcuate(flo)\nReticent(flo)\nCracking(flo)\nBronze(flo)\nWealthy(cami)\nAurorean(cami)\nArcuate(cami)\nBronze(cami)\nWealthy(berte)\nAurorean(berte)\nArcuate(berte)\nNavicular(berte)\nReticent(berte)\nWealthy(torr)\nWealthy(torr) -> Cracking(torr)\nforall x (Cracking(x) -> Aurorean(x))\nforall x (Cracking(x) and Aurorean(x) -> Arcuate(x))\n\nnot Bronze(berte)\n\nnot Bronze(berte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Tremain is glassless. Tremain is soprano. Tremain is clarion. Tremain is triumphal. Tremain is uninfected. Beatrix is laudable. Beatrix is glassless. Beatrix is soprano. Beatrix is uninfected. Eadith is laudable. Eadith is glassless. Eadith is soprano. Eadith is unfocussed. Eadith is clarion. Jolynn is laudable. If Jolynn is laudable then Jolynn is triumphal. If someone is triumphal then they are glassless. If someone is triumphal and glassless then they are soprano. Tremain is laudable.", "logic": "\nGlassless(tremain)\nSoprano(tremain)\nClarion(tremain)\nTriumphal(tremain)\nUninfected(tremain)\nLaudable(beatrix)\nGlassless(beatrix)\nSoprano(beatrix)\nUninfected(beatrix)\nLaudable(eadith)\nGlassless(eadith)\nSoprano(eadith)\nUnfocussed(eadith)\nClarion(eadith)\nLaudable(jolynn)\nLaudable(jolynn) -> Triumphal(jolynn)\nforall x (Triumphal(x) -> Glassless(x))\nforall x (Triumphal(x) and Glassless(x) -> Soprano(x))\n\nLaudable(tremain)\n\nLaudable(tremain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Bogdan is federated. Bogdan is bituminous. Bogdan is timed. Bogdan is mislaid. Bogdan is crusted. Doroteya is appalled. Doroteya is federated. Doroteya is bituminous. Doroteya is crusted. Keelia is appalled. Keelia is federated. Keelia is bituminous. Keelia is rude. Keelia is timed. Jacklyn is appalled. If Jacklyn is appalled then Jacklyn is mislaid. If someone is mislaid then they are federated. If someone is mislaid and federated then they are bituminous. Doroteya is not timed.", "logic": "\nFederated(bogdan)\nBituminous(bogdan)\nTimed(bogdan)\nMislaid(bogdan)\nCrusted(bogdan)\nAppalled(doroteya)\nFederated(doroteya)\nBituminous(doroteya)\nCrusted(doroteya)\nAppalled(keelia)\nFederated(keelia)\nBituminous(keelia)\nRude(keelia)\nTimed(keelia)\nAppalled(jacklyn)\nAppalled(jacklyn) -> Mislaid(jacklyn)\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> Federated(x))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) and Federated(x) -> Bituminous(x))\n\nnot Timed(doroteya)\n\nnot Timed(doroteya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Worden is untethered. Worden is cymose. Worden is engaged. Worden is bullocky. Worden is palpatory. Jenette is touristy. Jenette is untethered. Jenette is cymose. Jenette is palpatory. Ellyn is touristy. Ellyn is untethered. Ellyn is cymose. Ellyn is legible. Ellyn is engaged. Kelley is touristy. If Kelley is touristy then Kelley is bullocky. If someone is bullocky then they are untethered. If someone is bullocky and untethered then they are cymose. Worden is legible.", "logic": "\nUntethered(worden)\nCymose(worden)\nEngaged(worden)\nBullocky(worden)\nPalpatory(worden)\nTouristy(jenette)\nUntethered(jenette)\nCymose(jenette)\nPalpatory(jenette)\nTouristy(ellyn)\nUntethered(ellyn)\nCymose(ellyn)\nLegible(ellyn)\nEngaged(ellyn)\nTouristy(kelley)\nTouristy(kelley) -> Bullocky(kelley)\nforall x (Bullocky(x) -> Untethered(x))\nforall x (Bullocky(x) and Untethered(x) -> Cymose(x))\n\nLegible(worden)\n\nLegible(worden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Mickey is appetitive. Mickey is utility. Mickey is botonee. Mickey is pressed. Mickey is auroral. Jennie is aberrant. Jennie is appetitive. Jennie is utility. Jennie is auroral. Zelma is aberrant. Zelma is appetitive. Zelma is utility. Zelma is rambling. Zelma is botonee. Mela is aberrant. If Mela is aberrant then Mela is pressed. If someone is pressed then they are appetitive. If someone is pressed and appetitive then they are utility. Jennie is not pressed.", "logic": "\nAppetitive(mickey)\nUtility(mickey)\nBotonee(mickey)\nPressed(mickey)\nAuroral(mickey)\nAberrant(jennie)\nAppetitive(jennie)\nUtility(jennie)\nAuroral(jennie)\nAberrant(zelma)\nAppetitive(zelma)\nUtility(zelma)\nRambling(zelma)\nBotonee(zelma)\nAberrant(mela)\nAberrant(mela) -> Pressed(mela)\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Appetitive(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Appetitive(x) -> Utility(x))\n\nnot Pressed(jennie)\n\nnot Pressed(jennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Broddie is stuffy. Broddie is isopteran. Broddie is fatuous. Broddie is purulent. Broddie is brattish. Marcela is burnt. Marcela is stuffy. Marcela is isopteran. Marcela is brattish. Ishmael is burnt. Ishmael is stuffy. Ishmael is isopteran. Ishmael is insurable. Ishmael is fatuous. Cheston is burnt. If Cheston is burnt then Cheston is purulent. If someone is purulent then they are stuffy. If someone is purulent and stuffy then they are isopteran. Cheston is insurable.", "logic": "\nStuffy(broddie)\nIsopteran(broddie)\nFatuous(broddie)\nPurulent(broddie)\nBrattish(broddie)\nBurnt(marcela)\nStuffy(marcela)\nIsopteran(marcela)\nBrattish(marcela)\nBurnt(ishmael)\nStuffy(ishmael)\nIsopteran(ishmael)\nInsurable(ishmael)\nFatuous(ishmael)\nBurnt(cheston)\nBurnt(cheston) -> Purulent(cheston)\nforall x (Purulent(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Stuffy(x) -> Isopteran(x))\n\nInsurable(cheston)\n\nInsurable(cheston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "The kora quantize the boyd. The boyd bedight the kora. The lurette stoke the kora. If something is carven then it is wrongful. If something is vicarious then it bedight the lurette. If something bedight the kora then it stoke the lurette. If the boyd is vicarious then the boyd stoke the lurette. If something bedight the kora then it quantize the boyd. If something stoke the lurette then the lurette bedight the boyd. If something stoke the kora and the kora stoke the lurette then the kora bedight the lurette. If something bedight the boyd then the boyd is vicarious. The boyd bedight the kora.", "logic": "\nQuantize(kora, boyd)\nBedight(boyd, kora)\nStoke(lurette, kora)\nforall x (Carven(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) -> Bedight(x, lurette))\nforall x (Bedight(x, kora) -> Stoke(x, lurette))\nVicarious(boyd) -> Stoke(boyd, lurette)\nforall x (Bedight(x, kora) -> Quantize(x, boyd))\nforall x (Stoke(x, lurette) -> Bedight(lurette, boyd))\nforall x (Stoke(x, kora) and Stoke(kora, lurette) -> Bedight(kora, lurette))\nforall x (Bedight(x, boyd) -> Vicarious(boyd))\n\nBedight(boyd, kora)\n\ntherefore Bedight(boyd, kora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The vivian wallow the junie. The junie photostat the vivian. The martina whistle the vivian. If something is atilt then it is shapely. If something is inaudible then it photostat the martina. If something photostat the vivian then it whistle the martina. If the junie is inaudible then the junie whistle the martina. If something photostat the vivian then it wallow the junie. If something whistle the martina then the martina photostat the junie. If something whistle the vivian and the vivian whistle the martina then the vivian photostat the martina. If something photostat the junie then the junie is inaudible. The vivian does not eat the junie.", "logic": "\nWallow(vivian, junie)\nPhotostat(junie, vivian)\nWhistle(martina, vivian)\nforall x (Atilt(x) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Inaudible(x) -> Photostat(x, martina))\nforall x (Photostat(x, vivian) -> Whistle(x, martina))\nInaudible(junie) -> Whistle(junie, martina)\nforall x (Photostat(x, vivian) -> Wallow(x, junie))\nforall x (Whistle(x, martina) -> Photostat(martina, junie))\nforall x (Whistle(x, vivian) and Whistle(vivian, martina) -> Photostat(vivian, martina))\nforall x (Photostat(x, junie) -> Inaudible(junie))\n\nnot Wallow(vivian, junie)\n\ntherefore Wallow(vivian, junie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The yuri gladden the hermina. The hermina tread the yuri. The junia remodel the yuri. If something is clownish then it is relaxed. If something is sixteenth then it tread the junia. If something tread the yuri then it remodel the junia. If the hermina is sixteenth then the hermina remodel the junia. If something tread the yuri then it gladden the hermina. If something remodel the junia then the junia tread the hermina. If something remodel the yuri and the yuri remodel the junia then the yuri tread the junia. If something tread the hermina then the hermina is sixteenth. The hermina gladden the hermina.", "logic": "\nGladden(yuri, hermina)\nTread(hermina, yuri)\nRemodel(junia, yuri)\nforall x (Clownish(x) -> Relaxed(x))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) -> Tread(x, junia))\nforall x (Tread(x, yuri) -> Remodel(x, junia))\nSixteenth(hermina) -> Remodel(hermina, junia)\nforall x (Tread(x, yuri) -> Gladden(x, hermina))\nforall x (Remodel(x, junia) -> Tread(junia, hermina))\nforall x (Remodel(x, yuri) and Remodel(yuri, junia) -> Tread(yuri, junia))\nforall x (Tread(x, hermina) -> Sixteenth(hermina))\n\nGladden(hermina, hermina)\n\nTread(hermina, yuri) and forall x (Tread(x, yuri) -> Gladden(x, hermina)) -> therefore Gladden(hermina, hermina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The george clarify the mairead. The mairead personate the george. The friedrick topdress the george. If something is phrenic then it is apnoeic. If something is worrying then it personate the friedrick. If something personate the george then it topdress the friedrick. If the mairead is worrying then the mairead topdress the friedrick. If something personate the george then it clarify the mairead. If something topdress the friedrick then the friedrick personate the mairead. If something topdress the george and the george topdress the friedrick then the george personate the friedrick. If something personate the mairead then the mairead is worrying. The mairead does not eat the mairead.", "logic": "\nClarify(george, mairead)\nPersonate(mairead, george)\nTopdress(friedrick, george)\nforall x (Phrenic(x) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Worrying(x) -> Personate(x, friedrick))\nforall x (Personate(x, george) -> Topdress(x, friedrick))\nWorrying(mairead) -> Topdress(mairead, friedrick)\nforall x (Personate(x, george) -> Clarify(x, mairead))\nforall x (Topdress(x, friedrick) -> Personate(friedrick, mairead))\nforall x (Topdress(x, george) and Topdress(george, friedrick) -> Personate(george, friedrick))\nforall x (Personate(x, mairead) -> Worrying(mairead))\n\nnot Clarify(mairead, mairead)\n\nPersonate(mairead, george) and forall x (Personate(x, george) -> Clarify(x, mairead)) -> therefore Clarify(mairead, mairead)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The andriana numerate the arnoldo. The arnoldo slabber the andriana. The joao lipread the andriana. If something is sedate then it is collagenic. If something is pectoral then it slabber the joao. If something slabber the andriana then it lipread the joao. If the arnoldo is pectoral then the arnoldo lipread the joao. If something slabber the andriana then it numerate the arnoldo. If something lipread the joao then the joao slabber the arnoldo. If something lipread the andriana and the andriana lipread the joao then the andriana slabber the joao. If something slabber the arnoldo then the arnoldo is pectoral. The joao slabber the arnoldo.", "logic": "\nNumerate(andriana, arnoldo)\nSlabber(arnoldo, andriana)\nLipread(joao, andriana)\nforall x (Sedate(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Slabber(x, joao))\nforall x (Slabber(x, andriana) -> Lipread(x, joao))\nPectoral(arnoldo) -> Lipread(arnoldo, joao)\nforall x (Slabber(x, andriana) -> Numerate(x, arnoldo))\nforall x (Lipread(x, joao) -> Slabber(joao, arnoldo))\nforall x (Lipread(x, andriana) and Lipread(andriana, joao) -> Slabber(andriana, joao))\nforall x (Slabber(x, arnoldo) -> Pectoral(arnoldo))\n\nSlabber(joao, arnoldo)\n\nSlabber(arnoldo, andriana) and forall x (Slabber(x, andriana) -> Lipread(x, joao)) -> therefore Lipread(arnoldo, joao) Lipread(arnoldo, joao) and forall x (Lipread(x, joao) -> Slabber(joao, arnoldo)) -> therefore Slabber(joao, arnoldo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The twila superpose the reynolds. The reynolds garotte the twila. The federico skin the twila. If something is spangly then it is semiformal. If something is lucky then it garotte the federico. If something garotte the twila then it skin the federico. If the reynolds is lucky then the reynolds skin the federico. If something garotte the twila then it superpose the reynolds. If something skin the federico then the federico garotte the reynolds. If something skin the twila and the twila skin the federico then the twila garotte the federico. If something garotte the reynolds then the reynolds is lucky. The federico does not like the reynolds.", "logic": "\nSuperpose(twila, reynolds)\nGarotte(reynolds, twila)\nSkin(federico, twila)\nforall x (Spangly(x) -> Semiformal(x))\nforall x (Lucky(x) -> Garotte(x, federico))\nforall x (Garotte(x, twila) -> Skin(x, federico))\nLucky(reynolds) -> Skin(reynolds, federico)\nforall x (Garotte(x, twila) -> Superpose(x, reynolds))\nforall x (Skin(x, federico) -> Garotte(federico, reynolds))\nforall x (Skin(x, twila) and Skin(twila, federico) -> Garotte(twila, federico))\nforall x (Garotte(x, reynolds) -> Lucky(reynolds))\n\nnot Garotte(federico, reynolds)\n\nGarotte(reynolds, twila) and forall x (Garotte(x, twila) -> Skin(x, federico)) -> therefore Skin(reynolds, federico) Skin(reynolds, federico) and forall x (Skin(x, federico) -> Garotte(federico, reynolds)) -> therefore Garotte(federico, reynolds)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The zed confuse the beau. The beau brave the zed. The pamella wholesale the zed. If something is fathomable then it is dextrorsal. If something is contested then it brave the pamella. If something brave the zed then it wholesale the pamella. If the beau is contested then the beau wholesale the pamella. If something brave the zed then it confuse the beau. If something wholesale the pamella then the pamella brave the beau. If something wholesale the zed and the zed wholesale the pamella then the zed brave the pamella. If something brave the beau then the beau is contested. The beau is contested.", "logic": "\nConfuse(zed, beau)\nBrave(beau, zed)\nWholesale(pamella, zed)\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\nforall x (Contested(x) -> Brave(x, pamella))\nforall x (Brave(x, zed) -> Wholesale(x, pamella))\nContested(beau) -> Wholesale(beau, pamella)\nforall x (Brave(x, zed) -> Confuse(x, beau))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, pamella) -> Brave(pamella, beau))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, zed) and Wholesale(zed, pamella) -> Brave(zed, pamella))\nforall x (Brave(x, beau) -> Contested(beau))\n\nContested(beau)\n\nBrave(beau, zed) and forall x (Brave(x, zed) -> Wholesale(x, pamella)) -> therefore Wholesale(beau, pamella) Wholesale(beau, pamella) and forall x (Wholesale(x, pamella) -> Brave(pamella, beau)) -> therefore Brave(pamella, beau) Brave(pamella, beau) and forall x (Brave(x, beau) -> Contested(beau)) -> therefore Contested(beau)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The bethanne refer the anissa. The anissa faggot the bethanne. The sarine whiz the bethanne. If something is laryngeal then it is adrift. If something is xcii then it faggot the sarine. If something faggot the bethanne then it whiz the sarine. If the anissa is xcii then the anissa whiz the sarine. If something faggot the bethanne then it refer the anissa. If something whiz the sarine then the sarine faggot the anissa. If something whiz the bethanne and the bethanne whiz the sarine then the bethanne faggot the sarine. If something faggot the anissa then the anissa is xcii. The anissa is not xcii.", "logic": "\nRefer(bethanne, anissa)\nFaggot(anissa, bethanne)\nWhiz(sarine, bethanne)\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Adrift(x))\nforall x (Xcii(x) -> Faggot(x, sarine))\nforall x (Faggot(x, bethanne) -> Whiz(x, sarine))\nXcii(anissa) -> Whiz(anissa, sarine)\nforall x (Faggot(x, bethanne) -> Refer(x, anissa))\nforall x (Whiz(x, sarine) -> Faggot(sarine, anissa))\nforall x (Whiz(x, bethanne) and Whiz(bethanne, sarine) -> Faggot(bethanne, sarine))\nforall x (Faggot(x, anissa) -> Xcii(anissa))\n\nnot Xcii(anissa)\n\nFaggot(anissa, bethanne) and forall x (Faggot(x, bethanne) -> Whiz(x, sarine)) -> therefore Whiz(anissa, sarine) Whiz(anissa, sarine) and forall x (Whiz(x, sarine) -> Faggot(sarine, anissa)) -> therefore Faggot(sarine, anissa) Faggot(sarine, anissa) and forall x (Faggot(x, anissa) -> Xcii(anissa)) -> therefore Xcii(anissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The ivie forestall the cindy. The cindy sock the ivie. The gus conjoin the ivie. If something is skintight then it is awed. If something is spicate then it sock the gus. If something sock the ivie then it conjoin the gus. If the cindy is spicate then the cindy conjoin the gus. If something sock the ivie then it forestall the cindy. If something conjoin the gus then the gus sock the cindy. If something conjoin the ivie and the ivie conjoin the gus then the ivie sock the gus. If something sock the cindy then the cindy is spicate. The ivie does not like the gus.", "logic": "\nForestall(ivie, cindy)\nSock(cindy, ivie)\nConjoin(gus, ivie)\nforall x (Skintight(x) -> Awed(x))\nforall x (Spicate(x) -> Sock(x, gus))\nforall x (Sock(x, ivie) -> Conjoin(x, gus))\nSpicate(cindy) -> Conjoin(cindy, gus)\nforall x (Sock(x, ivie) -> Forestall(x, cindy))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, gus) -> Sock(gus, cindy))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, ivie) and Conjoin(ivie, gus) -> Sock(ivie, gus))\nforall x (Sock(x, cindy) -> Spicate(cindy))\n\nnot Sock(ivie, gus)\n\nforall x (Conjoin(x, ivie) and Conjoin(ivie, gus) -> Sock(ivie, gus)) <- forall x (Sock(x, ivie) -> Conjoin(x, gus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The sandi pace the berty. The berty recrudesce the sandi. The roxy medicine the sandi. If something is utopian then it is micropylar. If something is prehensile then it recrudesce the roxy. If something recrudesce the sandi then it medicine the roxy. If the berty is prehensile then the berty medicine the roxy. If something recrudesce the sandi then it pace the berty. If something medicine the roxy then the roxy recrudesce the berty. If something medicine the sandi and the sandi medicine the roxy then the sandi recrudesce the roxy. If something recrudesce the berty then the berty is prehensile. The roxy pace the berty.", "logic": "\nPace(sandi, berty)\nRecrudesce(berty, sandi)\nMedicine(roxy, sandi)\nforall x (Utopian(x) -> Micropylar(x))\nforall x (Prehensile(x) -> Recrudesce(x, roxy))\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, sandi) -> Medicine(x, roxy))\nPrehensile(berty) -> Medicine(berty, roxy)\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, sandi) -> Pace(x, berty))\nforall x (Medicine(x, roxy) -> Recrudesce(roxy, berty))\nforall x (Medicine(x, sandi) and Medicine(sandi, roxy) -> Recrudesce(sandi, roxy))\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, berty) -> Prehensile(berty))\n\nPace(roxy, berty)\n\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, sandi) -> Pace(x, berty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The augustine apologise the trevar. The trevar nigrify the augustine. The carlo linearize the augustine. If something is strident then it is convinced. If something is brickle then it nigrify the carlo. If something nigrify the augustine then it linearize the carlo. If the trevar is brickle then the trevar linearize the carlo. If something nigrify the augustine then it apologise the trevar. If something linearize the carlo then the carlo nigrify the trevar. If something linearize the augustine and the augustine linearize the carlo then the augustine nigrify the carlo. If something nigrify the trevar then the trevar is brickle. The carlo does not see the carlo.", "logic": "\nApologise(augustine, trevar)\nNigrify(trevar, augustine)\nLinearize(carlo, augustine)\nforall x (Strident(x) -> Convinced(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) -> Nigrify(x, carlo))\nforall x (Nigrify(x, augustine) -> Linearize(x, carlo))\nBrickle(trevar) -> Linearize(trevar, carlo)\nforall x (Nigrify(x, augustine) -> Apologise(x, trevar))\nforall x (Linearize(x, carlo) -> Nigrify(carlo, trevar))\nforall x (Linearize(x, augustine) and Linearize(augustine, carlo) -> Nigrify(augustine, carlo))\nforall x (Nigrify(x, trevar) -> Brickle(trevar))\n\nnot Linearize(carlo, carlo)\n\nforall x (Nigrify(x, augustine) -> Linearize(x, carlo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The brandea arborise the mira. The mira attorn the brandea. The nari synthesize the brandea. If something is best then it is phallic. If something is stomachal then it attorn the nari. If something attorn the brandea then it synthesize the nari. If the mira is stomachal then the mira synthesize the nari. If something attorn the brandea then it arborise the mira. If something synthesize the nari then the nari attorn the mira. If something synthesize the brandea and the brandea synthesize the nari then the brandea attorn the nari. If something attorn the mira then the mira is stomachal. The nari attorn the nari.", "logic": "\nArborise(brandea, mira)\nAttorn(mira, brandea)\nSynthesize(nari, brandea)\nforall x (Best(x) -> Phallic(x))\nforall x (Stomachal(x) -> Attorn(x, nari))\nforall x (Attorn(x, brandea) -> Synthesize(x, nari))\nStomachal(mira) -> Synthesize(mira, nari)\nforall x (Attorn(x, brandea) -> Arborise(x, mira))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, nari) -> Attorn(nari, mira))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, brandea) and Synthesize(brandea, nari) -> Attorn(brandea, nari))\nforall x (Attorn(x, mira) -> Stomachal(mira))\n\nAttorn(nari, nari)\n\nforall x (Stomachal(x) -> Attorn(x, nari)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The elwira apprehend the gianina. The gianina suture the elwira. The neron uniformise the elwira. If something is arduous then it is ritzy. If something is slashed then it suture the neron. If something suture the elwira then it uniformise the neron. If the gianina is slashed then the gianina uniformise the neron. If something suture the elwira then it apprehend the gianina. If something uniformise the neron then the neron suture the gianina. If something uniformise the elwira and the elwira uniformise the neron then the elwira suture the neron. If something suture the gianina then the gianina is slashed. The gianina does not eat the elwira.", "logic": "\nApprehend(elwira, gianina)\nSuture(gianina, elwira)\nUniformise(neron, elwira)\nforall x (Arduous(x) -> Ritzy(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Suture(x, neron))\nforall x (Suture(x, elwira) -> Uniformise(x, neron))\nSlashed(gianina) -> Uniformise(gianina, neron)\nforall x (Suture(x, elwira) -> Apprehend(x, gianina))\nforall x (Uniformise(x, neron) -> Suture(neron, gianina))\nforall x (Uniformise(x, elwira) and Uniformise(elwira, neron) -> Suture(elwira, neron))\nforall x (Suture(x, gianina) -> Slashed(gianina))\n\nnot Apprehend(gianina, elwira)\n\nnot Apprehend(gianina, elwira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The antonius hawk the lorrie. The lorrie harbor the antonius. The faun intromit the antonius. If something is remindful then it is unrhymed. If something is silent then it harbor the faun. If something harbor the antonius then it intromit the faun. If the lorrie is silent then the lorrie intromit the faun. If something harbor the antonius then it hawk the lorrie. If something intromit the faun then the faun harbor the lorrie. If something intromit the antonius and the antonius intromit the faun then the antonius harbor the faun. If something harbor the lorrie then the lorrie is silent. The lorrie harbor the lorrie.", "logic": "\nHawk(antonius, lorrie)\nHarbor(lorrie, antonius)\nIntromit(faun, antonius)\nforall x (Remindful(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\nforall x (Silent(x) -> Harbor(x, faun))\nforall x (Harbor(x, antonius) -> Intromit(x, faun))\nSilent(lorrie) -> Intromit(lorrie, faun)\nforall x (Harbor(x, antonius) -> Hawk(x, lorrie))\nforall x (Intromit(x, faun) -> Harbor(faun, lorrie))\nforall x (Intromit(x, antonius) and Intromit(antonius, faun) -> Harbor(antonius, faun))\nforall x (Harbor(x, lorrie) -> Silent(lorrie))\n\nHarbor(lorrie, lorrie)\n\nHarbor(lorrie, lorrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The cherice fashion the agamemnon. The agamemnon sleepwalk the cherice. The jacki garden the cherice. If something is capillary then it is happy. If something is lighted then it sleepwalk the jacki. If something sleepwalk the cherice then it garden the jacki. If the agamemnon is lighted then the agamemnon garden the jacki. If something sleepwalk the cherice then it fashion the agamemnon. If something garden the jacki then the jacki sleepwalk the agamemnon. If something garden the cherice and the cherice garden the jacki then the cherice sleepwalk the jacki. If something sleepwalk the agamemnon then the agamemnon is lighted. The jacki is not blue.", "logic": "\nFashion(cherice, agamemnon)\nSleepwalk(agamemnon, cherice)\nGarden(jacki, cherice)\nforall x (Capillary(x) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Sleepwalk(x, jacki))\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, cherice) -> Garden(x, jacki))\nLighted(agamemnon) -> Garden(agamemnon, jacki)\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, cherice) -> Fashion(x, agamemnon))\nforall x (Garden(x, jacki) -> Sleepwalk(jacki, agamemnon))\nforall x (Garden(x, cherice) and Garden(cherice, jacki) -> Sleepwalk(cherice, jacki))\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, agamemnon) -> Lighted(agamemnon))\n\nnot Blue(jacki)\n\nnot Blue(jacki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The gregorio fledge the gonzales. The gonzales chaperone the gregorio. The yolande deem the gregorio. If something is wormlike then it is digital. If something is nurturant then it chaperone the yolande. If something chaperone the gregorio then it deem the yolande. If the gonzales is nurturant then the gonzales deem the yolande. If something chaperone the gregorio then it fledge the gonzales. If something deem the yolande then the yolande chaperone the gonzales. If something deem the gregorio and the gregorio deem the yolande then the gregorio chaperone the yolande. If something chaperone the gonzales then the gonzales is nurturant. The gregorio fledge the yolande.", "logic": "\nFledge(gregorio, gonzales)\nChaperone(gonzales, gregorio)\nDeem(yolande, gregorio)\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Digital(x))\nforall x (Nurturant(x) -> Chaperone(x, yolande))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, gregorio) -> Deem(x, yolande))\nNurturant(gonzales) -> Deem(gonzales, yolande)\nforall x (Chaperone(x, gregorio) -> Fledge(x, gonzales))\nforall x (Deem(x, yolande) -> Chaperone(yolande, gonzales))\nforall x (Deem(x, gregorio) and Deem(gregorio, yolande) -> Chaperone(gregorio, yolande))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, gonzales) -> Nurturant(gonzales))\n\nFledge(gregorio, yolande)\n\nFledge(gregorio, yolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "Trudey is senile. Trudey is gooselike. Trudey is celtic. Trudey is bitchy. Sallee is senile. Sallee is celtic. Annabel is senile. Annabel is fleshy. Annabel is gooselike. Annabel is celtic. Leticia is senile. Leticia is fleshy. Leticia is spotted. Leticia is unadjusted. Leticia is celtic. Leticia is bitchy. If something is celtic then it is senile. If something is celtic then it is fleshy. If Trudey is bitchy and Trudey is senile then Trudey is gooselike. All bitchy, celtic things are spotted. If Leticia is spotted and Leticia is bitchy then Leticia is celtic. If something is fleshy then it is bitchy. Leticia is spotted.", "logic": "\nSenile(trudey)\nGooselike(trudey)\nCeltic(trudey)\nBitchy(trudey)\nSenile(sallee)\nCeltic(sallee)\nSenile(annabel)\nFleshy(annabel)\nGooselike(annabel)\nCeltic(annabel)\nSenile(leticia)\nFleshy(leticia)\nSpotted(leticia)\nUnadjusted(leticia)\nCeltic(leticia)\nBitchy(leticia)\nforall x (Celtic(x) -> Senile(x))\nforall x (Celtic(x) -> Fleshy(x))\nBitchy(trudey) and Senile(trudey) -> Gooselike(trudey)\nforall x (Bitchy(x) and Celtic(x) -> Spotted(x))\nSpotted(leticia) and Bitchy(leticia) -> Celtic(leticia)\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Bitchy(x))\n\nSpotted(leticia)\n\ntherefore Spotted(leticia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Andee is kindred. Andee is verrucose. Andee is joyful. Andee is seventieth. Bill is kindred. Bill is joyful. Susan is kindred. Susan is unprepared. Susan is verrucose. Susan is joyful. Niki is kindred. Niki is unprepared. Niki is sizable. Niki is permeative. Niki is joyful. Niki is seventieth. If something is joyful then it is kindred. If something is joyful then it is unprepared. If Andee is seventieth and Andee is kindred then Andee is verrucose. All seventieth, joyful things are sizable. If Niki is sizable and Niki is seventieth then Niki is joyful. If something is unprepared then it is seventieth. Niki is not unprepared.", "logic": "\nKindred(andee)\nVerrucose(andee)\nJoyful(andee)\nSeventieth(andee)\nKindred(bill)\nJoyful(bill)\nKindred(susan)\nUnprepared(susan)\nVerrucose(susan)\nJoyful(susan)\nKindred(niki)\nUnprepared(niki)\nSizable(niki)\nPermeative(niki)\nJoyful(niki)\nSeventieth(niki)\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Kindred(x))\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nSeventieth(andee) and Kindred(andee) -> Verrucose(andee)\nforall x (Seventieth(x) and Joyful(x) -> Sizable(x))\nSizable(niki) and Seventieth(niki) -> Joyful(niki)\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Seventieth(x))\n\nnot Unprepared(niki)\n\ntherefore Unprepared(niki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Colline is suggestive. Colline is diabolic. Colline is anatomical. Colline is swaggering. Kassia is suggestive. Kassia is anatomical. Philly is suggestive. Philly is alate. Philly is diabolic. Philly is anatomical. Fanchon is suggestive. Fanchon is alate. Fanchon is hypaethral. Fanchon is unexpected. Fanchon is anatomical. Fanchon is swaggering. If something is anatomical then it is suggestive. If something is anatomical then it is alate. If Colline is swaggering and Colline is suggestive then Colline is diabolic. All swaggering, anatomical things are hypaethral. If Fanchon is hypaethral and Fanchon is swaggering then Fanchon is anatomical. If something is alate then it is swaggering. Colline is hypaethral.", "logic": "\nSuggestive(colline)\nDiabolic(colline)\nAnatomical(colline)\nSwaggering(colline)\nSuggestive(kassia)\nAnatomical(kassia)\nSuggestive(philly)\nAlate(philly)\nDiabolic(philly)\nAnatomical(philly)\nSuggestive(fanchon)\nAlate(fanchon)\nHypaethral(fanchon)\nUnexpected(fanchon)\nAnatomical(fanchon)\nSwaggering(fanchon)\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Alate(x))\nSwaggering(colline) and Suggestive(colline) -> Diabolic(colline)\nforall x (Swaggering(x) and Anatomical(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\nHypaethral(fanchon) and Swaggering(fanchon) -> Anatomical(fanchon)\nforall x (Alate(x) -> Swaggering(x))\n\nHypaethral(colline)\n\nSwaggering(colline) and Anatomical(colline) and forall x (Swaggering(x) and Anatomical(x) -> Hypaethral(x)) -> therefore Hypaethral(colline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Moshe is expectant. Moshe is bentonitic. Moshe is unmannered. Moshe is craggy. Yehudit is expectant. Yehudit is unmannered. Bee is expectant. Bee is millennian. Bee is bentonitic. Bee is unmannered. Mac is expectant. Mac is millennian. Mac is attested. Mac is untrodden. Mac is unmannered. Mac is craggy. If something is unmannered then it is expectant. If something is unmannered then it is millennian. If Moshe is craggy and Moshe is expectant then Moshe is bentonitic. All craggy, unmannered things are attested. If Mac is attested and Mac is craggy then Mac is unmannered. If something is millennian then it is craggy. Yehudit is not millennian.", "logic": "\nExpectant(moshe)\nBentonitic(moshe)\nUnmannered(moshe)\nCraggy(moshe)\nExpectant(yehudit)\nUnmannered(yehudit)\nExpectant(bee)\nMillennian(bee)\nBentonitic(bee)\nUnmannered(bee)\nExpectant(mac)\nMillennian(mac)\nAttested(mac)\nUntrodden(mac)\nUnmannered(mac)\nCraggy(mac)\nforall x (Unmannered(x) -> Expectant(x))\nforall x (Unmannered(x) -> Millennian(x))\nCraggy(moshe) and Expectant(moshe) -> Bentonitic(moshe)\nforall x (Craggy(x) and Unmannered(x) -> Attested(x))\nAttested(mac) and Craggy(mac) -> Unmannered(mac)\nforall x (Millennian(x) -> Craggy(x))\n\nnot Millennian(yehudit)\n\nUnmannered(yehudit) and forall x (Unmannered(x) -> Millennian(x)) -> therefore Millennian(yehudit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Abe is astute. Abe is tipped. Abe is branched. Abe is moated. Malorie is astute. Malorie is branched. Eugene is astute. Eugene is coarctate. Eugene is tipped. Eugene is branched. Sondra is astute. Sondra is coarctate. Sondra is gluttonous. Sondra is identical. Sondra is branched. Sondra is moated. If something is branched then it is astute. If something is branched then it is coarctate. If Abe is moated and Abe is astute then Abe is tipped. All moated, branched things are gluttonous. If Sondra is gluttonous and Sondra is moated then Sondra is branched. If something is coarctate then it is moated. Eugene is gluttonous.", "logic": "\nAstute(abe)\nTipped(abe)\nBranched(abe)\nMoated(abe)\nAstute(malorie)\nBranched(malorie)\nAstute(eugene)\nCoarctate(eugene)\nTipped(eugene)\nBranched(eugene)\nAstute(sondra)\nCoarctate(sondra)\nGluttonous(sondra)\nIdentical(sondra)\nBranched(sondra)\nMoated(sondra)\nforall x (Branched(x) -> Astute(x))\nforall x (Branched(x) -> Coarctate(x))\nMoated(abe) and Astute(abe) -> Tipped(abe)\nforall x (Moated(x) and Branched(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nGluttonous(sondra) and Moated(sondra) -> Branched(sondra)\nforall x (Coarctate(x) -> Moated(x))\n\nGluttonous(eugene)\n\nCoarctate(eugene) and forall x (Coarctate(x) -> Moated(x)) -> therefore Moated(eugene) Moated(eugene) and Branched(eugene) and forall x (Moated(x) and Branched(x) -> Gluttonous(x)) -> therefore Gluttonous(eugene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Hanny is superfine. Hanny is burrlike. Hanny is filthy. Hanny is terete. Bobbie is superfine. Bobbie is filthy. Collie is superfine. Collie is insurgent. Collie is burrlike. Collie is filthy. Nadine is superfine. Nadine is insurgent. Nadine is overlying. Nadine is provident. Nadine is filthy. Nadine is terete. If something is filthy then it is superfine. If something is filthy then it is insurgent. If Hanny is terete and Hanny is superfine then Hanny is burrlike. All terete, filthy things are overlying. If Nadine is overlying and Nadine is terete then Nadine is filthy. If something is insurgent then it is terete. Bobbie is not terete.", "logic": "\nSuperfine(hanny)\nBurrlike(hanny)\nFilthy(hanny)\nTerete(hanny)\nSuperfine(bobbie)\nFilthy(bobbie)\nSuperfine(collie)\nInsurgent(collie)\nBurrlike(collie)\nFilthy(collie)\nSuperfine(nadine)\nInsurgent(nadine)\nOverlying(nadine)\nProvident(nadine)\nFilthy(nadine)\nTerete(nadine)\nforall x (Filthy(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) -> Insurgent(x))\nTerete(hanny) and Superfine(hanny) -> Burrlike(hanny)\nforall x (Terete(x) and Filthy(x) -> Overlying(x))\nOverlying(nadine) and Terete(nadine) -> Filthy(nadine)\nforall x (Insurgent(x) -> Terete(x))\n\nnot Terete(bobbie)\n\nFilthy(bobbie) and forall x (Filthy(x) -> Insurgent(x)) -> therefore Insurgent(bobbie) Insurgent(bobbie) and forall x (Insurgent(x) -> Terete(x)) -> therefore Terete(bobbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Bradley is unpointed. Bradley is horizontal. Bradley is custodial. Bradley is weatherly. Christi is unpointed. Christi is custodial. Kimberlyn is unpointed. Kimberlyn is winged. Kimberlyn is horizontal. Kimberlyn is custodial. Alberta is unpointed. Alberta is winged. Alberta is duplicable. Alberta is crowning. Alberta is custodial. Alberta is weatherly. If something is custodial then it is unpointed. If something is custodial then it is winged. If Bradley is weatherly and Bradley is unpointed then Bradley is horizontal. All weatherly, custodial things are duplicable. If Alberta is duplicable and Alberta is weatherly then Alberta is custodial. If something is winged then it is weatherly. Christi is duplicable.", "logic": "\nUnpointed(bradley)\nHorizontal(bradley)\nCustodial(bradley)\nWeatherly(bradley)\nUnpointed(christi)\nCustodial(christi)\nUnpointed(kimberlyn)\nWinged(kimberlyn)\nHorizontal(kimberlyn)\nCustodial(kimberlyn)\nUnpointed(alberta)\nWinged(alberta)\nDuplicable(alberta)\nCrowning(alberta)\nCustodial(alberta)\nWeatherly(alberta)\nforall x (Custodial(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Custodial(x) -> Winged(x))\nWeatherly(bradley) and Unpointed(bradley) -> Horizontal(bradley)\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Custodial(x) -> Duplicable(x))\nDuplicable(alberta) and Weatherly(alberta) -> Custodial(alberta)\nforall x (Winged(x) -> Weatherly(x))\n\nDuplicable(christi)\n\nCustodial(christi) and forall x (Custodial(x) -> Winged(x)) -> therefore Winged(christi) Winged(christi) and forall x (Winged(x) -> Weatherly(x)) -> therefore Weatherly(christi) Weatherly(christi) and Custodial(christi) and forall x (Weatherly(x) and Custodial(x) -> Duplicable(x)) -> therefore Duplicable(christi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Meyer is trig. Meyer is somnific. Meyer is hopeless. Meyer is befouled. Lela is trig. Lela is hopeless. Violette is trig. Violette is mangey. Violette is somnific. Violette is hopeless. Dimitri is trig. Dimitri is mangey. Dimitri is pejorative. Dimitri is wolflike. Dimitri is hopeless. Dimitri is befouled. If something is hopeless then it is trig. If something is hopeless then it is mangey. If Meyer is befouled and Meyer is trig then Meyer is somnific. All befouled, hopeless things are pejorative. If Dimitri is pejorative and Dimitri is befouled then Dimitri is hopeless. If something is mangey then it is befouled. Lela is not pejorative.", "logic": "\nTrig(meyer)\nSomnific(meyer)\nHopeless(meyer)\nBefouled(meyer)\nTrig(lela)\nHopeless(lela)\nTrig(violette)\nMangey(violette)\nSomnific(violette)\nHopeless(violette)\nTrig(dimitri)\nMangey(dimitri)\nPejorative(dimitri)\nWolflike(dimitri)\nHopeless(dimitri)\nBefouled(dimitri)\nforall x (Hopeless(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) -> Mangey(x))\nBefouled(meyer) and Trig(meyer) -> Somnific(meyer)\nforall x (Befouled(x) and Hopeless(x) -> Pejorative(x))\nPejorative(dimitri) and Befouled(dimitri) -> Hopeless(dimitri)\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> Befouled(x))\n\nnot Pejorative(lela)\n\nHopeless(lela) and forall x (Hopeless(x) -> Mangey(x)) -> therefore Mangey(lela) Mangey(lela) and forall x (Mangey(x) -> Befouled(x)) -> therefore Befouled(lela) Befouled(lela) and Hopeless(lela) and forall x (Befouled(x) and Hopeless(x) -> Pejorative(x)) -> therefore Pejorative(lela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Lisabeth is norse. Lisabeth is raiding. Lisabeth is chipper. Lisabeth is intermural. Kyla is norse. Kyla is chipper. Danelle is norse. Danelle is fractious. Danelle is raiding. Danelle is chipper. Hayes is norse. Hayes is fractious. Hayes is barbarous. Hayes is opened. Hayes is chipper. Hayes is intermural. If something is chipper then it is norse. If something is chipper then it is fractious. If Lisabeth is intermural and Lisabeth is norse then Lisabeth is raiding. All intermural, chipper things are barbarous. If Hayes is barbarous and Hayes is intermural then Hayes is chipper. If something is fractious then it is intermural. Kyla is not raiding.", "logic": "\nNorse(lisabeth)\nRaiding(lisabeth)\nChipper(lisabeth)\nIntermural(lisabeth)\nNorse(kyla)\nChipper(kyla)\nNorse(danelle)\nFractious(danelle)\nRaiding(danelle)\nChipper(danelle)\nNorse(hayes)\nFractious(hayes)\nBarbarous(hayes)\nOpened(hayes)\nChipper(hayes)\nIntermural(hayes)\nforall x (Chipper(x) -> Norse(x))\nforall x (Chipper(x) -> Fractious(x))\nIntermural(lisabeth) and Norse(lisabeth) -> Raiding(lisabeth)\nforall x (Intermural(x) and Chipper(x) -> Barbarous(x))\nBarbarous(hayes) and Intermural(hayes) -> Chipper(hayes)\nforall x (Fractious(x) -> Intermural(x))\n\nnot Raiding(kyla)\n\nnot Raiding(kyla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Duffie is unthankful. Duffie is motherly. Duffie is nerveless. Duffie is bigheaded. Giordano is unthankful. Giordano is nerveless. Annalena is unthankful. Annalena is mysterious. Annalena is motherly. Annalena is nerveless. Raquela is unthankful. Raquela is mysterious. Raquela is polysemous. Raquela is baptised. Raquela is nerveless. Raquela is bigheaded. If something is nerveless then it is unthankful. If something is nerveless then it is mysterious. If Duffie is bigheaded and Duffie is unthankful then Duffie is motherly. All bigheaded, nerveless things are polysemous. If Raquela is polysemous and Raquela is bigheaded then Raquela is nerveless. If something is mysterious then it is bigheaded. Giordano is baptised.", "logic": "\nUnthankful(duffie)\nMotherly(duffie)\nNerveless(duffie)\nBigheaded(duffie)\nUnthankful(giordano)\nNerveless(giordano)\nUnthankful(annalena)\nMysterious(annalena)\nMotherly(annalena)\nNerveless(annalena)\nUnthankful(raquela)\nMysterious(raquela)\nPolysemous(raquela)\nBaptised(raquela)\nNerveless(raquela)\nBigheaded(raquela)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Mysterious(x))\nBigheaded(duffie) and Unthankful(duffie) -> Motherly(duffie)\nforall x (Bigheaded(x) and Nerveless(x) -> Polysemous(x))\nPolysemous(raquela) and Bigheaded(raquela) -> Nerveless(raquela)\nforall x (Mysterious(x) -> Bigheaded(x))\n\nBaptised(giordano)\n\nBaptised(giordano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Kit is underhand. Kit is censored. Kit is taloned. Kit is coaxing. Hill is underhand. Hill is taloned. Drake is underhand. Drake is choragic. Drake is censored. Drake is taloned. Phillipp is underhand. Phillipp is choragic. Phillipp is negative. Phillipp is handled. Phillipp is taloned. Phillipp is coaxing. If something is taloned then it is underhand. If something is taloned then it is choragic. If Kit is coaxing and Kit is underhand then Kit is censored. All coaxing, taloned things are negative. If Phillipp is negative and Phillipp is coaxing then Phillipp is taloned. If something is choragic then it is coaxing. Phillipp is not censored.", "logic": "\nUnderhand(kit)\nCensored(kit)\nTaloned(kit)\nCoaxing(kit)\nUnderhand(hill)\nTaloned(hill)\nUnderhand(drake)\nChoragic(drake)\nCensored(drake)\nTaloned(drake)\nUnderhand(phillipp)\nChoragic(phillipp)\nNegative(phillipp)\nHandled(phillipp)\nTaloned(phillipp)\nCoaxing(phillipp)\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> Choragic(x))\nCoaxing(kit) and Underhand(kit) -> Censored(kit)\nforall x (Coaxing(x) and Taloned(x) -> Negative(x))\nNegative(phillipp) and Coaxing(phillipp) -> Taloned(phillipp)\nforall x (Choragic(x) -> Coaxing(x))\n\nnot Censored(phillipp)\n\nnot Censored(phillipp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Reuben is exogamic. Reuben is dissimilar. Reuben is benefic. Reuben is noncausal. Annabell is exogamic. Annabell is benefic. Kellsie is exogamic. Kellsie is cogitative. Kellsie is dissimilar. Kellsie is benefic. Mareah is exogamic. Mareah is cogitative. Mareah is porcine. Mareah is clxxv. Mareah is benefic. Mareah is noncausal. If something is benefic then it is exogamic. If something is benefic then it is cogitative. If Reuben is noncausal and Reuben is exogamic then Reuben is dissimilar. All noncausal, benefic things are porcine. If Mareah is porcine and Mareah is noncausal then Mareah is benefic. If something is cogitative then it is noncausal. Kellsie is clxxv.", "logic": "\nExogamic(reuben)\nDissimilar(reuben)\nBenefic(reuben)\nNoncausal(reuben)\nExogamic(annabell)\nBenefic(annabell)\nExogamic(kellsie)\nCogitative(kellsie)\nDissimilar(kellsie)\nBenefic(kellsie)\nExogamic(mareah)\nCogitative(mareah)\nPorcine(mareah)\nClxxv(mareah)\nBenefic(mareah)\nNoncausal(mareah)\nforall x (Benefic(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Benefic(x) -> Cogitative(x))\nNoncausal(reuben) and Exogamic(reuben) -> Dissimilar(reuben)\nforall x (Noncausal(x) and Benefic(x) -> Porcine(x))\nPorcine(mareah) and Noncausal(mareah) -> Benefic(mareah)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) -> Noncausal(x))\n\nClxxv(kellsie)\n\nClxxv(kellsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "The minda deface the jerrold. The jerrold slacken the nikolai. The nikolai earmark the jerrold. If someone earmark the jerrold then they eat the minda. If someone earmark the minda then the minda deface the nikolai. If someone is sage and they like the nikolai then they are financial. If someone is sage and vendible then they eat the jerrold. If someone slacken the minda then the minda earmark the jerrold. If someone slacken the nikolai then they are financial. The jerrold slacken the nikolai.", "logic": "\nDeface(minda, jerrold)\nSlacken(jerrold, nikolai)\nEarmark(nikolai, jerrold)\nforall x (Earmark(x, jerrold) -> Slacken(x, minda))\nforall x (Earmark(x, minda) -> Deface(minda, nikolai))\nforall x (Sage(x) and Earmark(x, nikolai) -> Financial(x))\nforall x (Sage(x) and Vendible(x) -> Slacken(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Slacken(x, minda) -> Earmark(minda, jerrold))\nforall x (Slacken(x, nikolai) -> Financial(x))\n\nSlacken(jerrold, nikolai)\n\ntherefore Slacken(jerrold, nikolai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The muire crumb the cammie. The cammie overcook the maurie. The maurie nick the cammie. If someone nick the cammie then they eat the muire. If someone nick the muire then the muire crumb the maurie. If someone is curving and they like the maurie then they are cephalic. If someone is curving and gilbertian then they eat the cammie. If someone overcook the muire then the muire nick the cammie. If someone overcook the maurie then they are cephalic. The cammie does not eat the maurie.", "logic": "\nCrumb(muire, cammie)\nOvercook(cammie, maurie)\nNick(maurie, cammie)\nforall x (Nick(x, cammie) -> Overcook(x, muire))\nforall x (Nick(x, muire) -> Crumb(muire, maurie))\nforall x (Curving(x) and Nick(x, maurie) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) and Gilbertian(x) -> Overcook(x, cammie))\nforall x (Overcook(x, muire) -> Nick(muire, cammie))\nforall x (Overcook(x, maurie) -> Cephalic(x))\n\nnot Overcook(cammie, maurie)\n\ntherefore Overcook(cammie, maurie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The ardath prize the alasdair. The alasdair archaize the charmion. The charmion antique the alasdair. If someone antique the alasdair then they eat the ardath. If someone antique the ardath then the ardath prize the charmion. If someone is shapely and they like the charmion then they are amative. If someone is shapely and dionysian then they eat the alasdair. If someone archaize the ardath then the ardath antique the alasdair. If someone archaize the charmion then they are amative. The charmion archaize the ardath.", "logic": "\nPrize(ardath, alasdair)\nArchaize(alasdair, charmion)\nAntique(charmion, alasdair)\nforall x (Antique(x, alasdair) -> Archaize(x, ardath))\nforall x (Antique(x, ardath) -> Prize(ardath, charmion))\nforall x (Shapely(x) and Antique(x, charmion) -> Amative(x))\nforall x (Shapely(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Archaize(x, alasdair))\nforall x (Archaize(x, ardath) -> Antique(ardath, alasdair))\nforall x (Archaize(x, charmion) -> Amative(x))\n\nArchaize(charmion, ardath)\n\nAntique(charmion, alasdair) and forall x (Antique(x, alasdair) -> Archaize(x, ardath)) -> therefore Archaize(charmion, ardath)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The jordanna frank the kaleena. The kaleena quit the elisha. The elisha flyfish the kaleena. If someone flyfish the kaleena then they eat the jordanna. If someone flyfish the jordanna then the jordanna frank the elisha. If someone is flint and they like the elisha then they are oldline. If someone is flint and sweeping then they eat the kaleena. If someone quit the jordanna then the jordanna flyfish the kaleena. If someone quit the elisha then they are oldline. The elisha does not eat the jordanna.", "logic": "\nFrank(jordanna, kaleena)\nQuit(kaleena, elisha)\nFlyfish(elisha, kaleena)\nforall x (Flyfish(x, kaleena) -> Quit(x, jordanna))\nforall x (Flyfish(x, jordanna) -> Frank(jordanna, elisha))\nforall x (Flint(x) and Flyfish(x, elisha) -> Oldline(x))\nforall x (Flint(x) and Sweeping(x) -> Quit(x, kaleena))\nforall x (Quit(x, jordanna) -> Flyfish(jordanna, kaleena))\nforall x (Quit(x, elisha) -> Oldline(x))\n\nnot Quit(elisha, jordanna)\n\nFlyfish(elisha, kaleena) and forall x (Flyfish(x, kaleena) -> Quit(x, jordanna)) -> therefore Quit(elisha, jordanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The mayda pounce the hermann. The hermann thrive the carilyn. The carilyn glean the hermann. If someone glean the hermann then they eat the mayda. If someone glean the mayda then the mayda pounce the carilyn. If someone is smothering and they like the carilyn then they are brickly. If someone is smothering and polydactyl then they eat the hermann. If someone thrive the mayda then the mayda glean the hermann. If someone thrive the carilyn then they are brickly. The mayda glean the hermann.", "logic": "\nPounce(mayda, hermann)\nThrive(hermann, carilyn)\nGlean(carilyn, hermann)\nforall x (Glean(x, hermann) -> Thrive(x, mayda))\nforall x (Glean(x, mayda) -> Pounce(mayda, carilyn))\nforall x (Smothering(x) and Glean(x, carilyn) -> Brickly(x))\nforall x (Smothering(x) and Polydactyl(x) -> Thrive(x, hermann))\nforall x (Thrive(x, mayda) -> Glean(mayda, hermann))\nforall x (Thrive(x, carilyn) -> Brickly(x))\n\nGlean(mayda, hermann)\n\nGlean(carilyn, hermann) and forall x (Glean(x, hermann) -> Thrive(x, mayda)) -> therefore Thrive(carilyn, mayda) Thrive(carilyn, mayda) and forall x (Thrive(x, mayda) -> Glean(mayda, hermann)) -> therefore Glean(mayda, hermann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The lissy recycle the dov. The dov ruck the laurianne. The laurianne novelise the dov. If someone novelise the dov then they eat the lissy. If someone novelise the lissy then the lissy recycle the laurianne. If someone is semiannual and they like the laurianne then they are plantal. If someone is semiannual and fueled then they eat the dov. If someone ruck the lissy then the lissy novelise the dov. If someone ruck the laurianne then they are plantal. The lissy does not like the dov.", "logic": "\nRecycle(lissy, dov)\nRuck(dov, laurianne)\nNovelise(laurianne, dov)\nforall x (Novelise(x, dov) -> Ruck(x, lissy))\nforall x (Novelise(x, lissy) -> Recycle(lissy, laurianne))\nforall x (Semiannual(x) and Novelise(x, laurianne) -> Plantal(x))\nforall x (Semiannual(x) and Fueled(x) -> Ruck(x, dov))\nforall x (Ruck(x, lissy) -> Novelise(lissy, dov))\nforall x (Ruck(x, laurianne) -> Plantal(x))\n\nnot Novelise(lissy, dov)\n\nNovelise(laurianne, dov) and forall x (Novelise(x, dov) -> Ruck(x, lissy)) -> therefore Ruck(laurianne, lissy) Ruck(laurianne, lissy) and forall x (Ruck(x, lissy) -> Novelise(lissy, dov)) -> therefore Novelise(lissy, dov)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The dosi plain the donny. The donny foxhunt the sandra. The sandra remedy the donny. If someone remedy the donny then they eat the dosi. If someone remedy the dosi then the dosi plain the sandra. If someone is disklike and they like the sandra then they are androgenic. If someone is disklike and unobliging then they eat the donny. If someone foxhunt the dosi then the dosi remedy the donny. If someone foxhunt the sandra then they are androgenic. The dosi foxhunt the dosi.", "logic": "\nPlain(dosi, donny)\nFoxhunt(donny, sandra)\nRemedy(sandra, donny)\nforall x (Remedy(x, donny) -> Foxhunt(x, dosi))\nforall x (Remedy(x, dosi) -> Plain(dosi, sandra))\nforall x (Disklike(x) and Remedy(x, sandra) -> Androgenic(x))\nforall x (Disklike(x) and Unobliging(x) -> Foxhunt(x, donny))\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, dosi) -> Remedy(dosi, donny))\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, sandra) -> Androgenic(x))\n\nFoxhunt(dosi, dosi)\n\nRemedy(sandra, donny) and forall x (Remedy(x, donny) -> Foxhunt(x, dosi)) -> therefore Foxhunt(sandra, dosi) Foxhunt(sandra, dosi) and forall x (Foxhunt(x, dosi) -> Remedy(dosi, donny)) -> therefore Remedy(dosi, donny) Remedy(dosi, donny) and forall x (Remedy(x, donny) -> Foxhunt(x, dosi)) -> therefore Foxhunt(dosi, dosi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The merna isolate the margery. The margery cosset the sayers. The sayers bracket the margery. If someone bracket the margery then they eat the merna. If someone bracket the merna then the merna isolate the sayers. If someone is clownish and they like the sayers then they are polysemous. If someone is clownish and brushlike then they eat the margery. If someone cosset the merna then the merna bracket the margery. If someone cosset the sayers then they are polysemous. The merna does not eat the merna.", "logic": "\nIsolate(merna, margery)\nCosset(margery, sayers)\nBracket(sayers, margery)\nforall x (Bracket(x, margery) -> Cosset(x, merna))\nforall x (Bracket(x, merna) -> Isolate(merna, sayers))\nforall x (Clownish(x) and Bracket(x, sayers) -> Polysemous(x))\nforall x (Clownish(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Cosset(x, margery))\nforall x (Cosset(x, merna) -> Bracket(merna, margery))\nforall x (Cosset(x, sayers) -> Polysemous(x))\n\nnot Cosset(merna, merna)\n\nBracket(sayers, margery) and forall x (Bracket(x, margery) -> Cosset(x, merna)) -> therefore Cosset(sayers, merna) Cosset(sayers, merna) and forall x (Cosset(x, merna) -> Bracket(merna, margery)) -> therefore Bracket(merna, margery) Bracket(merna, margery) and forall x (Bracket(x, margery) -> Cosset(x, merna)) -> therefore Cosset(merna, merna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The collette atrophy the nessy. The nessy unionise the lavinie. The lavinie videotape the nessy. If someone videotape the nessy then they eat the collette. If someone videotape the collette then the collette atrophy the lavinie. If someone is nonfatal and they like the lavinie then they are musky. If someone is nonfatal and rebellious then they eat the nessy. If someone unionise the collette then the collette videotape the nessy. If someone unionise the lavinie then they are musky. The collette does not eat the nessy.", "logic": "\nAtrophy(collette, nessy)\nUnionise(nessy, lavinie)\nVideotape(lavinie, nessy)\nforall x (Videotape(x, nessy) -> Unionise(x, collette))\nforall x (Videotape(x, collette) -> Atrophy(collette, lavinie))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) and Videotape(x, lavinie) -> Musky(x))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) and Rebellious(x) -> Unionise(x, nessy))\nforall x (Unionise(x, collette) -> Videotape(collette, nessy))\nforall x (Unionise(x, lavinie) -> Musky(x))\n\nnot Unionise(collette, nessy)\n\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) and Rebellious(x) -> Unionise(x, nessy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The shandy tutor the jolie. The jolie avianise the annabal. The annabal intumesce the jolie. If someone intumesce the jolie then they eat the shandy. If someone intumesce the shandy then the shandy tutor the annabal. If someone is inchoative and they like the annabal then they are curt. If someone is inchoative and sulfurous then they eat the jolie. If someone avianise the shandy then the shandy intumesce the jolie. If someone avianise the annabal then they are curt. The annabal is curt.", "logic": "\nTutor(shandy, jolie)\nAvianise(jolie, annabal)\nIntumesce(annabal, jolie)\nforall x (Intumesce(x, jolie) -> Avianise(x, shandy))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, shandy) -> Tutor(shandy, annabal))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) and Intumesce(x, annabal) -> Curt(x))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) and Sulfurous(x) -> Avianise(x, jolie))\nforall x (Avianise(x, shandy) -> Intumesce(shandy, jolie))\nforall x (Avianise(x, annabal) -> Curt(x))\n\nCurt(annabal)\n\nforall x (Inchoative(x) and Intumesce(x, annabal) -> Curt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The paddie immolate the clo. The clo penalise the allianora. The allianora skive the clo. If someone skive the clo then they eat the paddie. If someone skive the paddie then the paddie immolate the allianora. If someone is erect and they like the allianora then they are parhelic. If someone is erect and passing then they eat the clo. If someone penalise the paddie then the paddie skive the clo. If someone penalise the allianora then they are parhelic. The clo does not eat the paddie.", "logic": "\nImmolate(paddie, clo)\nPenalise(clo, allianora)\nSkive(allianora, clo)\nforall x (Skive(x, clo) -> Penalise(x, paddie))\nforall x (Skive(x, paddie) -> Immolate(paddie, allianora))\nforall x (Erect(x) and Skive(x, allianora) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (Erect(x) and Passing(x) -> Penalise(x, clo))\nforall x (Penalise(x, paddie) -> Skive(paddie, clo))\nforall x (Penalise(x, allianora) -> Parhelic(x))\n\nnot Penalise(clo, paddie)\n\nforall x (Skive(x, clo) -> Penalise(x, paddie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The charmion underquote the euphemia. The euphemia affirm the andres. The andres anagram the euphemia. If someone anagram the euphemia then they eat the charmion. If someone anagram the charmion then the charmion underquote the andres. If someone is brambly and they like the andres then they are musky. If someone is brambly and overcast then they eat the euphemia. If someone affirm the charmion then the charmion anagram the euphemia. If someone affirm the andres then they are musky. The charmion is musky.", "logic": "\nUnderquote(charmion, euphemia)\nAffirm(euphemia, andres)\nAnagram(andres, euphemia)\nforall x (Anagram(x, euphemia) -> Affirm(x, charmion))\nforall x (Anagram(x, charmion) -> Underquote(charmion, andres))\nforall x (Brambly(x) and Anagram(x, andres) -> Musky(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) and Overcast(x) -> Affirm(x, euphemia))\nforall x (Affirm(x, charmion) -> Anagram(charmion, euphemia))\nforall x (Affirm(x, andres) -> Musky(x))\n\nMusky(charmion)\n\nforall x (Brambly(x) and Anagram(x, andres) -> Musky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The wynnie puncture the corrine. The corrine rack the raimund. The raimund bisect the corrine. If someone bisect the corrine then they eat the wynnie. If someone bisect the wynnie then the wynnie puncture the raimund. If someone is surly and they like the raimund then they are thick. If someone is surly and overdue then they eat the corrine. If someone rack the wynnie then the wynnie bisect the corrine. If someone rack the raimund then they are thick. The corrine does not like the corrine.", "logic": "\nPuncture(wynnie, corrine)\nRack(corrine, raimund)\nBisect(raimund, corrine)\nforall x (Bisect(x, corrine) -> Rack(x, wynnie))\nforall x (Bisect(x, wynnie) -> Puncture(wynnie, raimund))\nforall x (Surly(x) and Bisect(x, raimund) -> Thick(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) and Overdue(x) -> Rack(x, corrine))\nforall x (Rack(x, wynnie) -> Bisect(wynnie, corrine))\nforall x (Rack(x, raimund) -> Thick(x))\n\nnot Bisect(corrine, corrine)\n\nnot Bisect(corrine, corrine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The doroteya preach the cecily. The cecily bulwark the sivert. The sivert aggravate the cecily. If someone aggravate the cecily then they eat the doroteya. If someone aggravate the doroteya then the doroteya preach the sivert. If someone is overdone and they like the sivert then they are pure. If someone is overdone and apish then they eat the cecily. If someone bulwark the doroteya then the doroteya aggravate the cecily. If someone bulwark the sivert then they are pure. The sivert aggravate the doroteya.", "logic": "\nPreach(doroteya, cecily)\nBulwark(cecily, sivert)\nAggravate(sivert, cecily)\nforall x (Aggravate(x, cecily) -> Bulwark(x, doroteya))\nforall x (Aggravate(x, doroteya) -> Preach(doroteya, sivert))\nforall x (Overdone(x) and Aggravate(x, sivert) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Overdone(x) and Apish(x) -> Bulwark(x, cecily))\nforall x (Bulwark(x, doroteya) -> Aggravate(doroteya, cecily))\nforall x (Bulwark(x, sivert) -> Pure(x))\n\nAggravate(sivert, doroteya)\n\nAggravate(sivert, doroteya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The wren excel the cleland. The cleland sallow the hana. The hana redouble the cleland. If someone redouble the cleland then they eat the wren. If someone redouble the wren then the wren excel the hana. If someone is trivial and they like the hana then they are vermicular. If someone is trivial and nasty then they eat the cleland. If someone sallow the wren then the wren redouble the cleland. If someone sallow the hana then they are vermicular. The cleland does not like the hana.", "logic": "\nExcel(wren, cleland)\nSallow(cleland, hana)\nRedouble(hana, cleland)\nforall x (Redouble(x, cleland) -> Sallow(x, wren))\nforall x (Redouble(x, wren) -> Excel(wren, hana))\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Redouble(x, hana) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Nasty(x) -> Sallow(x, cleland))\nforall x (Sallow(x, wren) -> Redouble(wren, cleland))\nforall x (Sallow(x, hana) -> Vermicular(x))\n\nnot Redouble(cleland, hana)\n\nnot Redouble(cleland, hana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The ashlie abut the albertine. The albertine flout the corette. The corette acclaim the albertine. If someone acclaim the albertine then they eat the ashlie. If someone acclaim the ashlie then the ashlie abut the corette. If someone is mutant and they like the corette then they are epic. If someone is mutant and broke then they eat the albertine. If someone flout the ashlie then the ashlie acclaim the albertine. If someone flout the corette then they are epic. The ashlie is blue.", "logic": "\nAbut(ashlie, albertine)\nFlout(albertine, corette)\nAcclaim(corette, albertine)\nforall x (Acclaim(x, albertine) -> Flout(x, ashlie))\nforall x (Acclaim(x, ashlie) -> Abut(ashlie, corette))\nforall x (Mutant(x) and Acclaim(x, corette) -> Epic(x))\nforall x (Mutant(x) and Broke(x) -> Flout(x, albertine))\nforall x (Flout(x, ashlie) -> Acclaim(ashlie, albertine))\nforall x (Flout(x, corette) -> Epic(x))\n\nBlue(ashlie)\n\nBlue(ashlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The lucila is idealised. The lucila is not unbroken. The lucila garage the clarine. The lucila garage the thia. The lucila does not need the devonne. The lucila destroy the thia. The devonne is serrulate. The devonne is unending. The devonne is unbroken. The devonne annoy the thia. The clarine is idealised. The clarine is unbroken. The thia is unbroken. The thia garage the lucila. The thia garage the clarine. The thia does not see the lucila. If something is contented and unending then it annoy the devonne. If something annoy the clarine and the clarine is unbroken then the clarine garage the lucila. If something is idealised and it garage the lucila then the lucila destroy the devonne. If something annoy the thia and it is unbroken then it destroy the clarine. If something annoy the devonne and the devonne is unbroken then it destroy the devonne. If something destroy the clarine and it is unbroken then it is contented. If the clarine is contented and the clarine is unending then the clarine does not see the lucila. If the devonne does not need the clarine then the clarine destroy the lucila. The thia does not see the lucila.", "logic": "\nIdealised(lucila)\nnot Unbroken(lucila)\nGarage(lucila, clarine)\nGarage(lucila, thia)\nnot Destroy(lucila, devonne)\nDestroy(lucila, thia)\nSerrulate(devonne)\nUnending(devonne)\nUnbroken(devonne)\nAnnoy(devonne, thia)\nIdealised(clarine)\nUnbroken(clarine)\nUnbroken(thia)\nGarage(thia, lucila)\nGarage(thia, clarine)\nnot Annoy(thia, lucila)\nforall x (Contented(x) and Unending(x) -> Annoy(x, devonne))\nforall x (Annoy(x, clarine) and Unbroken(clarine) -> Garage(clarine, lucila))\nforall x (Idealised(x) and Garage(x, lucila) -> Destroy(lucila, devonne))\nforall x (Annoy(x, thia) and Unbroken(x) -> Destroy(x, clarine))\nforall x (Annoy(x, devonne) and Unbroken(devonne) -> Destroy(x, devonne))\nforall x (Destroy(x, clarine) and Unbroken(x) -> Contented(x))\nContented(clarine) and Unending(clarine) -> not Annoy(clarine, lucila)\nnot Destroy(devonne, clarine) -> Destroy(clarine, lucila)\n\nnot Annoy(thia, lucila)\n\ntherefore not Annoy(thia, lucila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The gert is ghanese. The gert is not pursued. The gert desalinate the clio. The gert desalinate the tawsha. The gert does not need the micheil. The gert cohere the tawsha. The micheil is forked. The micheil is puppyish. The micheil is pursued. The micheil tenderise the tawsha. The clio is ghanese. The clio is pursued. The tawsha is pursued. The tawsha desalinate the gert. The tawsha desalinate the clio. The tawsha does not see the gert. If something is horary and puppyish then it tenderise the micheil. If something tenderise the clio and the clio is pursued then the clio desalinate the gert. If something is ghanese and it desalinate the gert then the gert cohere the micheil. If something tenderise the tawsha and it is pursued then it cohere the clio. If something tenderise the micheil and the micheil is pursued then it cohere the micheil. If something cohere the clio and it is pursued then it is horary. If the clio is horary and the clio is puppyish then the clio does not see the gert. If the micheil does not need the clio then the clio cohere the gert. The micheil is not puppyish.", "logic": "\nGhanese(gert)\nnot Pursued(gert)\nDesalinate(gert, clio)\nDesalinate(gert, tawsha)\nnot Cohere(gert, micheil)\nCohere(gert, tawsha)\nForked(micheil)\nPuppyish(micheil)\nPursued(micheil)\nTenderise(micheil, tawsha)\nGhanese(clio)\nPursued(clio)\nPursued(tawsha)\nDesalinate(tawsha, gert)\nDesalinate(tawsha, clio)\nnot Tenderise(tawsha, gert)\nforall x (Horary(x) and Puppyish(x) -> Tenderise(x, micheil))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, clio) and Pursued(clio) -> Desalinate(clio, gert))\nforall x (Ghanese(x) and Desalinate(x, gert) -> Cohere(gert, micheil))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, tawsha) and Pursued(x) -> Cohere(x, clio))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, micheil) and Pursued(micheil) -> Cohere(x, micheil))\nforall x (Cohere(x, clio) and Pursued(x) -> Horary(x))\nHorary(clio) and Puppyish(clio) -> not Tenderise(clio, gert)\nnot Cohere(micheil, clio) -> Cohere(clio, gert)\n\nnot Puppyish(micheil)\n\ntherefore Puppyish(micheil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The enoch is chintzy. The enoch is not pious. The enoch dehumanize the julianne. The enoch dehumanize the jordain. The enoch does not need the ernst. The enoch elicit the jordain. The ernst is manifold. The ernst is obstinate. The ernst is pious. The ernst codify the jordain. The julianne is chintzy. The julianne is pious. The jordain is pious. The jordain dehumanize the enoch. The jordain dehumanize the julianne. The jordain does not see the enoch. If something is undefined and obstinate then it codify the ernst. If something codify the julianne and the julianne is pious then the julianne dehumanize the enoch. If something is chintzy and it dehumanize the enoch then the enoch elicit the ernst. If something codify the jordain and it is pious then it elicit the julianne. If something codify the ernst and the ernst is pious then it elicit the ernst. If something elicit the julianne and it is pious then it is undefined. If the julianne is undefined and the julianne is obstinate then the julianne does not see the enoch. If the ernst does not need the julianne then the julianne elicit the enoch. The ernst elicit the julianne.", "logic": "\nChintzy(enoch)\nnot Pious(enoch)\nDehumanize(enoch, julianne)\nDehumanize(enoch, jordain)\nnot Elicit(enoch, ernst)\nElicit(enoch, jordain)\nManifold(ernst)\nObstinate(ernst)\nPious(ernst)\nCodify(ernst, jordain)\nChintzy(julianne)\nPious(julianne)\nPious(jordain)\nDehumanize(jordain, enoch)\nDehumanize(jordain, julianne)\nnot Codify(jordain, enoch)\nforall x (Undefined(x) and Obstinate(x) -> Codify(x, ernst))\nforall x (Codify(x, julianne) and Pious(julianne) -> Dehumanize(julianne, enoch))\nforall x (Chintzy(x) and Dehumanize(x, enoch) -> Elicit(enoch, ernst))\nforall x (Codify(x, jordain) and Pious(x) -> Elicit(x, julianne))\nforall x (Codify(x, ernst) and Pious(ernst) -> Elicit(x, ernst))\nforall x (Elicit(x, julianne) and Pious(x) -> Undefined(x))\nUndefined(julianne) and Obstinate(julianne) -> not Codify(julianne, enoch)\nnot Elicit(ernst, julianne) -> Elicit(julianne, enoch)\n\nElicit(ernst, julianne)\n\nCodify(ernst, jordain) and Pious(ernst) and forall x (Codify(x, jordain) and Pious(x) -> Elicit(x, julianne)) -> therefore Elicit(ernst, julianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The mace is torn. The mace is not undeserved. The mace sour the cindie. The mace sour the tobey. The mace does not need the ninon. The mace vinify the tobey. The ninon is deciphered. The ninon is billowy. The ninon is undeserved. The ninon bandage the tobey. The cindie is torn. The cindie is undeserved. The tobey is undeserved. The tobey sour the mace. The tobey sour the cindie. The tobey does not see the mace. If something is snuffly and billowy then it bandage the ninon. If something bandage the cindie and the cindie is undeserved then the cindie sour the mace. If something is torn and it sour the mace then the mace vinify the ninon. If something bandage the tobey and it is undeserved then it vinify the cindie. If something bandage the ninon and the ninon is undeserved then it vinify the ninon. If something vinify the cindie and it is undeserved then it is snuffly. If the cindie is snuffly and the cindie is billowy then the cindie does not see the mace. If the ninon does not need the cindie then the cindie vinify the mace. The ninon does not need the cindie.", "logic": "\nTorn(mace)\nnot Undeserved(mace)\nSour(mace, cindie)\nSour(mace, tobey)\nnot Vinify(mace, ninon)\nVinify(mace, tobey)\nDeciphered(ninon)\nBillowy(ninon)\nUndeserved(ninon)\nBandage(ninon, tobey)\nTorn(cindie)\nUndeserved(cindie)\nUndeserved(tobey)\nSour(tobey, mace)\nSour(tobey, cindie)\nnot Bandage(tobey, mace)\nforall x (Snuffly(x) and Billowy(x) -> Bandage(x, ninon))\nforall x (Bandage(x, cindie) and Undeserved(cindie) -> Sour(cindie, mace))\nforall x (Torn(x) and Sour(x, mace) -> Vinify(mace, ninon))\nforall x (Bandage(x, tobey) and Undeserved(x) -> Vinify(x, cindie))\nforall x (Bandage(x, ninon) and Undeserved(ninon) -> Vinify(x, ninon))\nforall x (Vinify(x, cindie) and Undeserved(x) -> Snuffly(x))\nSnuffly(cindie) and Billowy(cindie) -> not Bandage(cindie, mace)\nnot Vinify(ninon, cindie) -> Vinify(cindie, mace)\n\nnot Vinify(ninon, cindie)\n\nBandage(ninon, tobey) and Undeserved(ninon) and forall x (Bandage(x, tobey) and Undeserved(x) -> Vinify(x, cindie)) -> therefore Vinify(ninon, cindie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The callie is back. The callie is not unadvised. The callie sacrifice the ritch. The callie sacrifice the lovell. The callie does not need the alberto. The callie taunt the lovell. The alberto is jeering. The alberto is organized. The alberto is unadvised. The alberto impart the lovell. The ritch is back. The ritch is unadvised. The lovell is unadvised. The lovell sacrifice the callie. The lovell sacrifice the ritch. The lovell does not see the callie. If something is steamy and organized then it impart the alberto. If something impart the ritch and the ritch is unadvised then the ritch sacrifice the callie. If something is back and it sacrifice the callie then the callie taunt the alberto. If something impart the lovell and it is unadvised then it taunt the ritch. If something impart the alberto and the alberto is unadvised then it taunt the alberto. If something taunt the ritch and it is unadvised then it is steamy. If the ritch is steamy and the ritch is organized then the ritch does not see the callie. If the alberto does not need the ritch then the ritch taunt the callie. The alberto is steamy.", "logic": "\nBack(callie)\nnot Unadvised(callie)\nSacrifice(callie, ritch)\nSacrifice(callie, lovell)\nnot Taunt(callie, alberto)\nTaunt(callie, lovell)\nJeering(alberto)\nOrganized(alberto)\nUnadvised(alberto)\nImpart(alberto, lovell)\nBack(ritch)\nUnadvised(ritch)\nUnadvised(lovell)\nSacrifice(lovell, callie)\nSacrifice(lovell, ritch)\nnot Impart(lovell, callie)\nforall x (Steamy(x) and Organized(x) -> Impart(x, alberto))\nforall x (Impart(x, ritch) and Unadvised(ritch) -> Sacrifice(ritch, callie))\nforall x (Back(x) and Sacrifice(x, callie) -> Taunt(callie, alberto))\nforall x (Impart(x, lovell) and Unadvised(x) -> Taunt(x, ritch))\nforall x (Impart(x, alberto) and Unadvised(alberto) -> Taunt(x, alberto))\nforall x (Taunt(x, ritch) and Unadvised(x) -> Steamy(x))\nSteamy(ritch) and Organized(ritch) -> not Impart(ritch, callie)\nnot Taunt(alberto, ritch) -> Taunt(ritch, callie)\n\nSteamy(alberto)\n\nImpart(alberto, lovell) and Unadvised(alberto) and forall x (Impart(x, lovell) and Unadvised(x) -> Taunt(x, ritch)) -> therefore Taunt(alberto, ritch) Taunt(alberto, ritch) and Unadvised(alberto) and forall x (Taunt(x, ritch) and Unadvised(x) -> Steamy(x)) -> therefore Steamy(alberto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The dunstan is botched. The dunstan is not rotatory. The dunstan spur the vassily. The dunstan spur the hope. The dunstan does not need the nadean. The dunstan freckle the hope. The nadean is shameful. The nadean is accessary. The nadean is rotatory. The nadean sigh the hope. The vassily is botched. The vassily is rotatory. The hope is rotatory. The hope spur the dunstan. The hope spur the vassily. The hope does not see the dunstan. If something is undersea and accessary then it sigh the nadean. If something sigh the vassily and the vassily is rotatory then the vassily spur the dunstan. If something is botched and it spur the dunstan then the dunstan freckle the nadean. If something sigh the hope and it is rotatory then it freckle the vassily. If something sigh the nadean and the nadean is rotatory then it freckle the nadean. If something freckle the vassily and it is rotatory then it is undersea. If the vassily is undersea and the vassily is accessary then the vassily does not see the dunstan. If the nadean does not need the vassily then the vassily freckle the dunstan. The nadean is not undersea.", "logic": "\nBotched(dunstan)\nnot Rotatory(dunstan)\nSpur(dunstan, vassily)\nSpur(dunstan, hope)\nnot Freckle(dunstan, nadean)\nFreckle(dunstan, hope)\nShameful(nadean)\nAccessary(nadean)\nRotatory(nadean)\nSigh(nadean, hope)\nBotched(vassily)\nRotatory(vassily)\nRotatory(hope)\nSpur(hope, dunstan)\nSpur(hope, vassily)\nnot Sigh(hope, dunstan)\nforall x (Undersea(x) and Accessary(x) -> Sigh(x, nadean))\nforall x (Sigh(x, vassily) and Rotatory(vassily) -> Spur(vassily, dunstan))\nforall x (Botched(x) and Spur(x, dunstan) -> Freckle(dunstan, nadean))\nforall x (Sigh(x, hope) and Rotatory(x) -> Freckle(x, vassily))\nforall x (Sigh(x, nadean) and Rotatory(nadean) -> Freckle(x, nadean))\nforall x (Freckle(x, vassily) and Rotatory(x) -> Undersea(x))\nUndersea(vassily) and Accessary(vassily) -> not Sigh(vassily, dunstan)\nnot Freckle(nadean, vassily) -> Freckle(vassily, dunstan)\n\nnot Undersea(nadean)\n\nSigh(nadean, hope) and Rotatory(nadean) and forall x (Sigh(x, hope) and Rotatory(x) -> Freckle(x, vassily)) -> therefore Freckle(nadean, vassily) Freckle(nadean, vassily) and Rotatory(nadean) and forall x (Freckle(x, vassily) and Rotatory(x) -> Undersea(x)) -> therefore Undersea(nadean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The manya is uncoerced. The manya is not neither. The manya pulsate the ronald. The manya pulsate the matthus. The manya does not need the braden. The manya publicise the matthus. The braden is unlicenced. The braden is epizoan. The braden is neither. The braden indwell the matthus. The ronald is uncoerced. The ronald is neither. The matthus is neither. The matthus pulsate the manya. The matthus pulsate the ronald. The matthus does not see the manya. If something is ossiferous and epizoan then it indwell the braden. If something indwell the ronald and the ronald is neither then the ronald pulsate the manya. If something is uncoerced and it pulsate the manya then the manya publicise the braden. If something indwell the matthus and it is neither then it publicise the ronald. If something indwell the braden and the braden is neither then it publicise the braden. If something publicise the ronald and it is neither then it is ossiferous. If the ronald is ossiferous and the ronald is epizoan then the ronald does not see the manya. If the braden does not need the ronald then the ronald publicise the manya. The braden indwell the braden.", "logic": "\nUncoerced(manya)\nnot Neither(manya)\nPulsate(manya, ronald)\nPulsate(manya, matthus)\nnot Publicise(manya, braden)\nPublicise(manya, matthus)\nUnlicenced(braden)\nEpizoan(braden)\nNeither(braden)\nIndwell(braden, matthus)\nUncoerced(ronald)\nNeither(ronald)\nNeither(matthus)\nPulsate(matthus, manya)\nPulsate(matthus, ronald)\nnot Indwell(matthus, manya)\nforall x (Ossiferous(x) and Epizoan(x) -> Indwell(x, braden))\nforall x (Indwell(x, ronald) and Neither(ronald) -> Pulsate(ronald, manya))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) and Pulsate(x, manya) -> Publicise(manya, braden))\nforall x (Indwell(x, matthus) and Neither(x) -> Publicise(x, ronald))\nforall x (Indwell(x, braden) and Neither(braden) -> Publicise(x, braden))\nforall x (Publicise(x, ronald) and Neither(x) -> Ossiferous(x))\nOssiferous(ronald) and Epizoan(ronald) -> not Indwell(ronald, manya)\nnot Publicise(braden, ronald) -> Publicise(ronald, manya)\n\nIndwell(braden, braden)\n\nIndwell(braden, matthus) and Neither(braden) and forall x (Indwell(x, matthus) and Neither(x) -> Publicise(x, ronald)) -> therefore Publicise(braden, ronald) Publicise(braden, ronald) and Neither(braden) and forall x (Publicise(x, ronald) and Neither(x) -> Ossiferous(x)) -> therefore Ossiferous(braden) Ossiferous(braden) and Epizoan(braden) and forall x (Ossiferous(x) and Epizoan(x) -> Indwell(x, braden)) -> therefore Indwell(braden, braden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The bobine is malayan. The bobine is not elfin. The bobine cumber the lulu. The bobine cumber the kalinda. The bobine does not need the melvin. The bobine stint the kalinda. The melvin is rentable. The melvin is unanimated. The melvin is elfin. The melvin witch the kalinda. The lulu is malayan. The lulu is elfin. The kalinda is elfin. The kalinda cumber the bobine. The kalinda cumber the lulu. The kalinda does not see the bobine. If something is occupied and unanimated then it witch the melvin. If something witch the lulu and the lulu is elfin then the lulu cumber the bobine. If something is malayan and it cumber the bobine then the bobine stint the melvin. If something witch the kalinda and it is elfin then it stint the lulu. If something witch the melvin and the melvin is elfin then it stint the melvin. If something stint the lulu and it is elfin then it is occupied. If the lulu is occupied and the lulu is unanimated then the lulu does not see the bobine. If the melvin does not need the lulu then the lulu stint the bobine. The melvin does not see the melvin.", "logic": "\nMalayan(bobine)\nnot Elfin(bobine)\nCumber(bobine, lulu)\nCumber(bobine, kalinda)\nnot Stint(bobine, melvin)\nStint(bobine, kalinda)\nRentable(melvin)\nUnanimated(melvin)\nElfin(melvin)\nWitch(melvin, kalinda)\nMalayan(lulu)\nElfin(lulu)\nElfin(kalinda)\nCumber(kalinda, bobine)\nCumber(kalinda, lulu)\nnot Witch(kalinda, bobine)\nforall x (Occupied(x) and Unanimated(x) -> Witch(x, melvin))\nforall x (Witch(x, lulu) and Elfin(lulu) -> Cumber(lulu, bobine))\nforall x (Malayan(x) and Cumber(x, bobine) -> Stint(bobine, melvin))\nforall x (Witch(x, kalinda) and Elfin(x) -> Stint(x, lulu))\nforall x (Witch(x, melvin) and Elfin(melvin) -> Stint(x, melvin))\nforall x (Stint(x, lulu) and Elfin(x) -> Occupied(x))\nOccupied(lulu) and Unanimated(lulu) -> not Witch(lulu, bobine)\nnot Stint(melvin, lulu) -> Stint(lulu, bobine)\n\nnot Witch(melvin, melvin)\n\nWitch(melvin, kalinda) and Elfin(melvin) and forall x (Witch(x, kalinda) and Elfin(x) -> Stint(x, lulu)) -> therefore Stint(melvin, lulu) Stint(melvin, lulu) and Elfin(melvin) and forall x (Stint(x, lulu) and Elfin(x) -> Occupied(x)) -> therefore Occupied(melvin) Occupied(melvin) and Unanimated(melvin) and forall x (Occupied(x) and Unanimated(x) -> Witch(x, melvin)) -> therefore Witch(melvin, melvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The alvinia is catacorner. The alvinia is not digitate. The alvinia immobilize the hilda. The alvinia immobilize the winifield. The alvinia does not need the jude. The alvinia canoodle the winifield. The jude is leery. The jude is puffed. The jude is digitate. The jude hint the winifield. The hilda is catacorner. The hilda is digitate. The winifield is digitate. The winifield immobilize the alvinia. The winifield immobilize the hilda. The winifield does not see the alvinia. If something is nacreous and puffed then it hint the jude. If something hint the hilda and the hilda is digitate then the hilda immobilize the alvinia. If something is catacorner and it immobilize the alvinia then the alvinia canoodle the jude. If something hint the winifield and it is digitate then it canoodle the hilda. If something hint the jude and the jude is digitate then it canoodle the jude. If something canoodle the hilda and it is digitate then it is nacreous. If the hilda is nacreous and the hilda is puffed then the hilda does not see the alvinia. If the jude does not need the hilda then the hilda canoodle the alvinia. The hilda does not see the jude.", "logic": "\nCatacorner(alvinia)\nnot Digitate(alvinia)\nImmobilize(alvinia, hilda)\nImmobilize(alvinia, winifield)\nnot Canoodle(alvinia, jude)\nCanoodle(alvinia, winifield)\nLeery(jude)\nPuffed(jude)\nDigitate(jude)\nHint(jude, winifield)\nCatacorner(hilda)\nDigitate(hilda)\nDigitate(winifield)\nImmobilize(winifield, alvinia)\nImmobilize(winifield, hilda)\nnot Hint(winifield, alvinia)\nforall x (Nacreous(x) and Puffed(x) -> Hint(x, jude))\nforall x (Hint(x, hilda) and Digitate(hilda) -> Immobilize(hilda, alvinia))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) and Immobilize(x, alvinia) -> Canoodle(alvinia, jude))\nforall x (Hint(x, winifield) and Digitate(x) -> Canoodle(x, hilda))\nforall x (Hint(x, jude) and Digitate(jude) -> Canoodle(x, jude))\nforall x (Canoodle(x, hilda) and Digitate(x) -> Nacreous(x))\nNacreous(hilda) and Puffed(hilda) -> not Hint(hilda, alvinia)\nnot Canoodle(jude, hilda) -> Canoodle(hilda, alvinia)\n\nnot Hint(hilda, jude)\n\nforall x (Nacreous(x) and Puffed(x) -> Hint(x, jude)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The paton is corded. The paton is not dependable. The paton upholster the bonita. The paton upholster the maurice. The paton does not need the lyda. The paton scroll the maurice. The lyda is glacial. The lyda is unexacting. The lyda is dependable. The lyda wing the maurice. The bonita is corded. The bonita is dependable. The maurice is dependable. The maurice upholster the paton. The maurice upholster the bonita. The maurice does not see the paton. If something is alfresco and unexacting then it wing the lyda. If something wing the bonita and the bonita is dependable then the bonita upholster the paton. If something is corded and it upholster the paton then the paton scroll the lyda. If something wing the maurice and it is dependable then it scroll the bonita. If something wing the lyda and the lyda is dependable then it scroll the lyda. If something scroll the bonita and it is dependable then it is alfresco. If the bonita is alfresco and the bonita is unexacting then the bonita does not see the paton. If the lyda does not need the bonita then the bonita scroll the paton. The maurice is alfresco.", "logic": "\nCorded(paton)\nnot Dependable(paton)\nUpholster(paton, bonita)\nUpholster(paton, maurice)\nnot Scroll(paton, lyda)\nScroll(paton, maurice)\nGlacial(lyda)\nUnexacting(lyda)\nDependable(lyda)\nWing(lyda, maurice)\nCorded(bonita)\nDependable(bonita)\nDependable(maurice)\nUpholster(maurice, paton)\nUpholster(maurice, bonita)\nnot Wing(maurice, paton)\nforall x (Alfresco(x) and Unexacting(x) -> Wing(x, lyda))\nforall x (Wing(x, bonita) and Dependable(bonita) -> Upholster(bonita, paton))\nforall x (Corded(x) and Upholster(x, paton) -> Scroll(paton, lyda))\nforall x (Wing(x, maurice) and Dependable(x) -> Scroll(x, bonita))\nforall x (Wing(x, lyda) and Dependable(lyda) -> Scroll(x, lyda))\nforall x (Scroll(x, bonita) and Dependable(x) -> Alfresco(x))\nAlfresco(bonita) and Unexacting(bonita) -> not Wing(bonita, paton)\nnot Scroll(lyda, bonita) -> Scroll(bonita, paton)\n\nAlfresco(maurice)\n\nforall x (Scroll(x, bonita) and Dependable(x) -> Alfresco(x)) <- forall x (Wing(x, maurice) and Dependable(x) -> Scroll(x, bonita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The gustav is subacid. The gustav is not epidural. The gustav totter the kati. The gustav totter the kirbie. The gustav does not need the thaddus. The gustav elegise the kirbie. The thaddus is cubelike. The thaddus is frustrated. The thaddus is epidural. The thaddus outgo the kirbie. The kati is subacid. The kati is epidural. The kirbie is epidural. The kirbie totter the gustav. The kirbie totter the kati. The kirbie does not see the gustav. If something is homostyled and frustrated then it outgo the thaddus. If something outgo the kati and the kati is epidural then the kati totter the gustav. If something is subacid and it totter the gustav then the gustav elegise the thaddus. If something outgo the kirbie and it is epidural then it elegise the kati. If something outgo the thaddus and the thaddus is epidural then it elegise the thaddus. If something elegise the kati and it is epidural then it is homostyled. If the kati is homostyled and the kati is frustrated then the kati does not see the gustav. If the thaddus does not need the kati then the kati elegise the gustav. The kirbie does not see the thaddus.", "logic": "\nSubacid(gustav)\nnot Epidural(gustav)\nTotter(gustav, kati)\nTotter(gustav, kirbie)\nnot Elegise(gustav, thaddus)\nElegise(gustav, kirbie)\nCubelike(thaddus)\nFrustrated(thaddus)\nEpidural(thaddus)\nOutgo(thaddus, kirbie)\nSubacid(kati)\nEpidural(kati)\nEpidural(kirbie)\nTotter(kirbie, gustav)\nTotter(kirbie, kati)\nnot Outgo(kirbie, gustav)\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Frustrated(x) -> Outgo(x, thaddus))\nforall x (Outgo(x, kati) and Epidural(kati) -> Totter(kati, gustav))\nforall x (Subacid(x) and Totter(x, gustav) -> Elegise(gustav, thaddus))\nforall x (Outgo(x, kirbie) and Epidural(x) -> Elegise(x, kati))\nforall x (Outgo(x, thaddus) and Epidural(thaddus) -> Elegise(x, thaddus))\nforall x (Elegise(x, kati) and Epidural(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nHomostyled(kati) and Frustrated(kati) -> not Outgo(kati, gustav)\nnot Elegise(thaddus, kati) -> Elegise(kati, gustav)\n\nnot Outgo(kirbie, thaddus)\n\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Frustrated(x) -> Outgo(x, thaddus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The calhoun is gratifying. The calhoun is not apogametic. The calhoun percuss the fraser. The calhoun percuss the ahmet. The calhoun does not need the oswald. The calhoun spot the ahmet. The oswald is impressed. The oswald is stoppered. The oswald is apogametic. The oswald pauperise the ahmet. The fraser is gratifying. The fraser is apogametic. The ahmet is apogametic. The ahmet percuss the calhoun. The ahmet percuss the fraser. The ahmet does not see the calhoun. If something is continuing and stoppered then it pauperise the oswald. If something pauperise the fraser and the fraser is apogametic then the fraser percuss the calhoun. If something is gratifying and it percuss the calhoun then the calhoun spot the oswald. If something pauperise the ahmet and it is apogametic then it spot the fraser. If something pauperise the oswald and the oswald is apogametic then it spot the oswald. If something spot the fraser and it is apogametic then it is continuing. If the fraser is continuing and the fraser is stoppered then the fraser does not see the calhoun. If the oswald does not need the fraser then the fraser spot the calhoun. The fraser is continuing.", "logic": "\nGratifying(calhoun)\nnot Apogametic(calhoun)\nPercuss(calhoun, fraser)\nPercuss(calhoun, ahmet)\nnot Spot(calhoun, oswald)\nSpot(calhoun, ahmet)\nImpressed(oswald)\nStoppered(oswald)\nApogametic(oswald)\nPauperise(oswald, ahmet)\nGratifying(fraser)\nApogametic(fraser)\nApogametic(ahmet)\nPercuss(ahmet, calhoun)\nPercuss(ahmet, fraser)\nnot Pauperise(ahmet, calhoun)\nforall x (Continuing(x) and Stoppered(x) -> Pauperise(x, oswald))\nforall x (Pauperise(x, fraser) and Apogametic(fraser) -> Percuss(fraser, calhoun))\nforall x (Gratifying(x) and Percuss(x, calhoun) -> Spot(calhoun, oswald))\nforall x (Pauperise(x, ahmet) and Apogametic(x) -> Spot(x, fraser))\nforall x (Pauperise(x, oswald) and Apogametic(oswald) -> Spot(x, oswald))\nforall x (Spot(x, fraser) and Apogametic(x) -> Continuing(x))\nContinuing(fraser) and Stoppered(fraser) -> not Pauperise(fraser, calhoun)\nnot Spot(oswald, fraser) -> Spot(fraser, calhoun)\n\nContinuing(fraser)\n\nforall x (Spot(x, fraser) and Apogametic(x) -> Continuing(x)) <- forall x (Pauperise(x, ahmet) and Apogametic(x) -> Spot(x, fraser)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The scot is unrivaled. The scot is not scythian. The scot wound the marja. The scot wound the danya. The scot does not need the nidia. The scot sound the danya. The nidia is realizable. The nidia is semipublic. The nidia is scythian. The nidia inunct the danya. The marja is unrivaled. The marja is scythian. The danya is scythian. The danya wound the scot. The danya wound the marja. The danya does not see the scot. If something is catkinate and semipublic then it inunct the nidia. If something inunct the marja and the marja is scythian then the marja wound the scot. If something is unrivaled and it wound the scot then the scot sound the nidia. If something inunct the danya and it is scythian then it sound the marja. If something inunct the nidia and the nidia is scythian then it sound the nidia. If something sound the marja and it is scythian then it is catkinate. If the marja is catkinate and the marja is semipublic then the marja does not see the scot. If the nidia does not need the marja then the marja sound the scot. The nidia does not like the nidia.", "logic": "\nUnrivaled(scot)\nnot Scythian(scot)\nWound(scot, marja)\nWound(scot, danya)\nnot Sound(scot, nidia)\nSound(scot, danya)\nRealizable(nidia)\nSemipublic(nidia)\nScythian(nidia)\nInunct(nidia, danya)\nUnrivaled(marja)\nScythian(marja)\nScythian(danya)\nWound(danya, scot)\nWound(danya, marja)\nnot Inunct(danya, scot)\nforall x (Catkinate(x) and Semipublic(x) -> Inunct(x, nidia))\nforall x (Inunct(x, marja) and Scythian(marja) -> Wound(marja, scot))\nforall x (Unrivaled(x) and Wound(x, scot) -> Sound(scot, nidia))\nforall x (Inunct(x, danya) and Scythian(x) -> Sound(x, marja))\nforall x (Inunct(x, nidia) and Scythian(nidia) -> Sound(x, nidia))\nforall x (Sound(x, marja) and Scythian(x) -> Catkinate(x))\nCatkinate(marja) and Semipublic(marja) -> not Inunct(marja, scot)\nnot Sound(nidia, marja) -> Sound(marja, scot)\n\nnot Wound(nidia, nidia)\n\nnot Wound(nidia, nidia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The kerrie is triumphant. The kerrie is not formidable. The kerrie skank the aldric. The kerrie skank the bettina. The kerrie does not need the paulette. The kerrie etch the bettina. The paulette is qualified. The paulette is inlaid. The paulette is formidable. The paulette skirt the bettina. The aldric is triumphant. The aldric is formidable. The bettina is formidable. The bettina skank the kerrie. The bettina skank the aldric. The bettina does not see the kerrie. If something is hermetic and inlaid then it skirt the paulette. If something skirt the aldric and the aldric is formidable then the aldric skank the kerrie. If something is triumphant and it skank the kerrie then the kerrie etch the paulette. If something skirt the bettina and it is formidable then it etch the aldric. If something skirt the paulette and the paulette is formidable then it etch the paulette. If something etch the aldric and it is formidable then it is hermetic. If the aldric is hermetic and the aldric is inlaid then the aldric does not see the kerrie. If the paulette does not need the aldric then the aldric etch the kerrie. The paulette skirt the aldric.", "logic": "\nTriumphant(kerrie)\nnot Formidable(kerrie)\nSkank(kerrie, aldric)\nSkank(kerrie, bettina)\nnot Etch(kerrie, paulette)\nEtch(kerrie, bettina)\nQualified(paulette)\nInlaid(paulette)\nFormidable(paulette)\nSkirt(paulette, bettina)\nTriumphant(aldric)\nFormidable(aldric)\nFormidable(bettina)\nSkank(bettina, kerrie)\nSkank(bettina, aldric)\nnot Skirt(bettina, kerrie)\nforall x (Hermetic(x) and Inlaid(x) -> Skirt(x, paulette))\nforall x (Skirt(x, aldric) and Formidable(aldric) -> Skank(aldric, kerrie))\nforall x (Triumphant(x) and Skank(x, kerrie) -> Etch(kerrie, paulette))\nforall x (Skirt(x, bettina) and Formidable(x) -> Etch(x, aldric))\nforall x (Skirt(x, paulette) and Formidable(paulette) -> Etch(x, paulette))\nforall x (Etch(x, aldric) and Formidable(x) -> Hermetic(x))\nHermetic(aldric) and Inlaid(aldric) -> not Skirt(aldric, kerrie)\nnot Etch(paulette, aldric) -> Etch(aldric, kerrie)\n\nSkirt(paulette, aldric)\n\nSkirt(paulette, aldric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The lorenzo is roguish. The lorenzo is not mephitic. The lorenzo gormandize the irvin. The lorenzo gormandize the skipton. The lorenzo does not need the belita. The lorenzo elide the skipton. The belita is unmown. The belita is brachiopod. The belita is mephitic. The belita flute the skipton. The irvin is roguish. The irvin is mephitic. The skipton is mephitic. The skipton gormandize the lorenzo. The skipton gormandize the irvin. The skipton does not see the lorenzo. If something is glued and brachiopod then it flute the belita. If something flute the irvin and the irvin is mephitic then the irvin gormandize the lorenzo. If something is roguish and it gormandize the lorenzo then the lorenzo elide the belita. If something flute the skipton and it is mephitic then it elide the irvin. If something flute the belita and the belita is mephitic then it elide the belita. If something elide the irvin and it is mephitic then it is glued. If the irvin is glued and the irvin is brachiopod then the irvin does not see the lorenzo. If the belita does not need the irvin then the irvin elide the lorenzo. The skipton does not like the belita.", "logic": "\nRoguish(lorenzo)\nnot Mephitic(lorenzo)\nGormandize(lorenzo, irvin)\nGormandize(lorenzo, skipton)\nnot Elide(lorenzo, belita)\nElide(lorenzo, skipton)\nUnmown(belita)\nBrachiopod(belita)\nMephitic(belita)\nFlute(belita, skipton)\nRoguish(irvin)\nMephitic(irvin)\nMephitic(skipton)\nGormandize(skipton, lorenzo)\nGormandize(skipton, irvin)\nnot Flute(skipton, lorenzo)\nforall x (Glued(x) and Brachiopod(x) -> Flute(x, belita))\nforall x (Flute(x, irvin) and Mephitic(irvin) -> Gormandize(irvin, lorenzo))\nforall x (Roguish(x) and Gormandize(x, lorenzo) -> Elide(lorenzo, belita))\nforall x (Flute(x, skipton) and Mephitic(x) -> Elide(x, irvin))\nforall x (Flute(x, belita) and Mephitic(belita) -> Elide(x, belita))\nforall x (Elide(x, irvin) and Mephitic(x) -> Glued(x))\nGlued(irvin) and Brachiopod(irvin) -> not Flute(irvin, lorenzo)\nnot Elide(belita, irvin) -> Elide(irvin, lorenzo)\n\nnot Gormandize(skipton, belita)\n\nnot Gormandize(skipton, belita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The jeanine is convoluted. The jeanine is not wormy. The jeanine automobile the janessa. The jeanine automobile the janeczka. The jeanine does not need the olaf. The jeanine frank the janeczka. The olaf is spiked. The olaf is delible. The olaf is wormy. The olaf disown the janeczka. The janessa is convoluted. The janessa is wormy. The janeczka is wormy. The janeczka automobile the jeanine. The janeczka automobile the janessa. The janeczka does not see the jeanine. If something is execrable and delible then it disown the olaf. If something disown the janessa and the janessa is wormy then the janessa automobile the jeanine. If something is convoluted and it automobile the jeanine then the jeanine frank the olaf. If something disown the janeczka and it is wormy then it frank the janessa. If something disown the olaf and the olaf is wormy then it frank the olaf. If something frank the janessa and it is wormy then it is execrable. If the janessa is execrable and the janessa is delible then the janessa does not see the jeanine. If the olaf does not need the janessa then the janessa frank the jeanine. The olaf automobile the janeczka.", "logic": "\nConvoluted(jeanine)\nnot Wormy(jeanine)\nAutomobile(jeanine, janessa)\nAutomobile(jeanine, janeczka)\nnot Frank(jeanine, olaf)\nFrank(jeanine, janeczka)\nSpiked(olaf)\nDelible(olaf)\nWormy(olaf)\nDisown(olaf, janeczka)\nConvoluted(janessa)\nWormy(janessa)\nWormy(janeczka)\nAutomobile(janeczka, jeanine)\nAutomobile(janeczka, janessa)\nnot Disown(janeczka, jeanine)\nforall x (Execrable(x) and Delible(x) -> Disown(x, olaf))\nforall x (Disown(x, janessa) and Wormy(janessa) -> Automobile(janessa, jeanine))\nforall x (Convoluted(x) and Automobile(x, jeanine) -> Frank(jeanine, olaf))\nforall x (Disown(x, janeczka) and Wormy(x) -> Frank(x, janessa))\nforall x (Disown(x, olaf) and Wormy(olaf) -> Frank(x, olaf))\nforall x (Frank(x, janessa) and Wormy(x) -> Execrable(x))\nExecrable(janessa) and Delible(janessa) -> not Disown(janessa, jeanine)\nnot Frank(olaf, janessa) -> Frank(janessa, jeanine)\n\nAutomobile(olaf, janeczka)\n\nAutomobile(olaf, janeczka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "Eugine is damp. Pierrette is blabby. Pierrette is henpecked. If Pierrette is healed then Pierrette is amylaceous. If something is healed then it is damp. If something is blabby then it is damp. If something is blabby and amylaceous then it is mucose. Blue things are healed. If something is amylaceous then it is henpecked. Pierrette is blabby.", "logic": "\nDamp(eugine)\nBlabby(pierrette)\nHenpecked(pierrette)\nHealed(pierrette) -> Amylaceous(pierrette)\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Damp(x))\nforall x (Blabby(x) -> Damp(x))\nforall x (Blabby(x) and Amylaceous(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Blabby(x) -> Healed(x))\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) -> Henpecked(x))\n\nBlabby(pierrette)\n\ntherefore Blabby(pierrette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Shanon is isolating. Aleecia is midmost. Aleecia is antacid. If Aleecia is learned then Aleecia is concentric. If something is learned then it is isolating. If something is midmost then it is isolating. If something is midmost and concentric then it is lucky. Blue things are learned. If something is concentric then it is antacid. Aleecia is not midmost.", "logic": "\nIsolating(shanon)\nMidmost(aleecia)\nAntacid(aleecia)\nLearned(aleecia) -> Concentric(aleecia)\nforall x (Learned(x) -> Isolating(x))\nforall x (Midmost(x) -> Isolating(x))\nforall x (Midmost(x) and Concentric(x) -> Lucky(x))\nforall x (Midmost(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> Antacid(x))\n\nnot Midmost(aleecia)\n\ntherefore Midmost(aleecia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Tori is unmingled. Kim is disabled. Kim is equivocal. If Kim is mettlesome then Kim is alright. If something is mettlesome then it is unmingled. If something is disabled then it is unmingled. If something is disabled and alright then it is seamy. Blue things are mettlesome. If something is alright then it is equivocal. Kim is unmingled.", "logic": "\nUnmingled(tori)\nDisabled(kim)\nEquivocal(kim)\nMettlesome(kim) -> Alright(kim)\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) -> Unmingled(x))\nforall x (Disabled(x) -> Unmingled(x))\nforall x (Disabled(x) and Alright(x) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Disabled(x) -> Mettlesome(x))\nforall x (Alright(x) -> Equivocal(x))\n\nUnmingled(kim)\n\nDisabled(kim) and forall x (Disabled(x) -> Unmingled(x)) -> therefore Unmingled(kim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Menard is mycenaean. Teodoro is homosexual. Teodoro is anamorphic. If Teodoro is yellowed then Teodoro is sapphic. If something is yellowed then it is mycenaean. If something is homosexual then it is mycenaean. If something is homosexual and sapphic then it is shortened. Blue things are yellowed. If something is sapphic then it is anamorphic. Teodoro is not mycenaean.", "logic": "\nMycenaean(menard)\nHomosexual(teodoro)\nAnamorphic(teodoro)\nYellowed(teodoro) -> Sapphic(teodoro)\nforall x (Yellowed(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Sapphic(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Yellowed(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\n\nnot Mycenaean(teodoro)\n\nHomosexual(teodoro) and forall x (Homosexual(x) -> Mycenaean(x)) -> therefore Mycenaean(teodoro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Pia is adipose. Gabriel is bubbling. Gabriel is beneficent. If Gabriel is luteal then Gabriel is ocular. If something is luteal then it is adipose. If something is bubbling then it is adipose. If something is bubbling and ocular then it is bold. Blue things are luteal. If something is ocular then it is beneficent. Gabriel is ocular.", "logic": "\nAdipose(pia)\nBubbling(gabriel)\nBeneficent(gabriel)\nLuteal(gabriel) -> Ocular(gabriel)\nforall x (Luteal(x) -> Adipose(x))\nforall x (Bubbling(x) -> Adipose(x))\nforall x (Bubbling(x) and Ocular(x) -> Bold(x))\nforall x (Bubbling(x) -> Luteal(x))\nforall x (Ocular(x) -> Beneficent(x))\n\nOcular(gabriel)\n\nBubbling(gabriel) and forall x (Bubbling(x) -> Luteal(x)) -> therefore Luteal(gabriel) Luteal(gabriel) and Luteal(gabriel) -> Ocular(gabriel) -> therefore Ocular(gabriel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Ozzie is noncurrent. Arnold is coiling. Arnold is olympian. If Arnold is comforted then Arnold is zoic. If something is comforted then it is noncurrent. If something is coiling then it is noncurrent. If something is coiling and zoic then it is knockabout. Blue things are comforted. If something is zoic then it is olympian. Arnold is not zoic.", "logic": "\nNoncurrent(ozzie)\nCoiling(arnold)\nOlympian(arnold)\nComforted(arnold) -> Zoic(arnold)\nforall x (Comforted(x) -> Noncurrent(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Noncurrent(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) and Zoic(x) -> Knockabout(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Comforted(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Olympian(x))\n\nnot Zoic(arnold)\n\nCoiling(arnold) and forall x (Coiling(x) -> Comforted(x)) -> therefore Comforted(arnold) Comforted(arnold) and Comforted(arnold) -> Zoic(arnold) -> therefore Zoic(arnold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Jordon is cogent. Marchall is drilled. Marchall is deniable. If Marchall is papal then Marchall is tonsured. If something is papal then it is cogent. If something is drilled then it is cogent. If something is drilled and tonsured then it is methodical. Blue things are papal. If something is tonsured then it is deniable. Marchall is methodical.", "logic": "\nCogent(jordon)\nDrilled(marchall)\nDeniable(marchall)\nPapal(marchall) -> Tonsured(marchall)\nforall x (Papal(x) -> Cogent(x))\nforall x (Drilled(x) -> Cogent(x))\nforall x (Drilled(x) and Tonsured(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Drilled(x) -> Papal(x))\nforall x (Tonsured(x) -> Deniable(x))\n\nMethodical(marchall)\n\nDrilled(marchall) and forall x (Drilled(x) -> Papal(x)) -> therefore Papal(marchall) Papal(marchall) and Papal(marchall) -> Tonsured(marchall) -> therefore Tonsured(marchall) Drilled(marchall) and Tonsured(marchall) and forall x (Drilled(x) and Tonsured(x) -> Methodical(x)) -> therefore Methodical(marchall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Martainn is gimbaled. Tomkin is unexpired. Tomkin is documented. If Tomkin is bigmouthed then Tomkin is appalled. If something is bigmouthed then it is gimbaled. If something is unexpired then it is gimbaled. If something is unexpired and appalled then it is faraway. Blue things are bigmouthed. If something is appalled then it is documented. Tomkin is not faraway.", "logic": "\nGimbaled(martainn)\nUnexpired(tomkin)\nDocumented(tomkin)\nBigmouthed(tomkin) -> Appalled(tomkin)\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Unexpired(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Unexpired(x) and Appalled(x) -> Faraway(x))\nforall x (Unexpired(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nforall x (Appalled(x) -> Documented(x))\n\nnot Faraway(tomkin)\n\nUnexpired(tomkin) and forall x (Unexpired(x) -> Bigmouthed(x)) -> therefore Bigmouthed(tomkin) Bigmouthed(tomkin) and Bigmouthed(tomkin) -> Appalled(tomkin) -> therefore Appalled(tomkin) Unexpired(tomkin) and Appalled(tomkin) and forall x (Unexpired(x) and Appalled(x) -> Faraway(x)) -> therefore Faraway(tomkin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Dionne is unstrained. Stanislaw is paying. Stanislaw is bellied. If Stanislaw is droopy then Stanislaw is pediatric. If something is droopy then it is unstrained. If something is paying then it is unstrained. If something is paying and pediatric then it is financial. Blue things are droopy. If something is pediatric then it is bellied. Dionne is not droopy.", "logic": "\nUnstrained(dionne)\nPaying(stanislaw)\nBellied(stanislaw)\nDroopy(stanislaw) -> Pediatric(stanislaw)\nforall x (Droopy(x) -> Unstrained(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Unstrained(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) and Pediatric(x) -> Financial(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Bellied(x))\n\nnot Droopy(dionne)\n\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Droopy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Julianna is multiple. Marika is whispered. Marika is runic. If Marika is occupied then Marika is lapsed. If something is occupied then it is multiple. If something is whispered then it is multiple. If something is whispered and lapsed then it is cannibalic. Blue things are occupied. If something is lapsed then it is runic. Julianna is cannibalic.", "logic": "\nMultiple(julianna)\nWhispered(marika)\nRunic(marika)\nOccupied(marika) -> Lapsed(marika)\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Multiple(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) -> Multiple(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) and Lapsed(x) -> Cannibalic(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Lapsed(x) -> Runic(x))\n\nCannibalic(julianna)\n\nforall x (Whispered(x) and Lapsed(x) -> Cannibalic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Nanette is opposite. Templeton is eleven. Templeton is casteless. If Templeton is upended then Templeton is carpal. If something is upended then it is opposite. If something is eleven then it is opposite. If something is eleven and carpal then it is quelled. Blue things are upended. If something is carpal then it is casteless. Nanette is not casteless.", "logic": "\nOpposite(nanette)\nEleven(templeton)\nCasteless(templeton)\nUpended(templeton) -> Carpal(templeton)\nforall x (Upended(x) -> Opposite(x))\nforall x (Eleven(x) -> Opposite(x))\nforall x (Eleven(x) and Carpal(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Eleven(x) -> Upended(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Casteless(x))\n\nnot Casteless(nanette)\n\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Casteless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Morley is sceptred. Filide is neuromotor. Filide is tetchy. If Filide is frigorific then Filide is executable. If something is frigorific then it is sceptred. If something is neuromotor then it is sceptred. If something is neuromotor and executable then it is revealing. Blue things are frigorific. If something is executable then it is tetchy. Filide is quiet.", "logic": "\nSceptred(morley)\nNeuromotor(filide)\nTetchy(filide)\nFrigorific(filide) -> Executable(filide)\nforall x (Frigorific(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) and Executable(x) -> Revealing(x))\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Executable(x) -> Tetchy(x))\n\nQuiet(filide)\n\nQuiet(filide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Sophia is kokka. Torrance is unbaptized. Torrance is roaring. If Torrance is undetected then Torrance is gammy. If something is undetected then it is kokka. If something is unbaptized then it is kokka. If something is unbaptized and gammy then it is hassidic. Blue things are undetected. If something is gammy then it is roaring. Sophia is not unbaptized.", "logic": "\nKokka(sophia)\nUnbaptized(torrance)\nRoaring(torrance)\nUndetected(torrance) -> Gammy(torrance)\nforall x (Undetected(x) -> Kokka(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Kokka(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) and Gammy(x) -> Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Undetected(x))\nforall x (Gammy(x) -> Roaring(x))\n\nnot Unbaptized(sophia)\n\nnot Unbaptized(sophia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Hana is dipylon. Tedda is multicolor. Tedda is berserk. If Tedda is electric then Tedda is vixenish. If something is electric then it is dipylon. If something is multicolor then it is dipylon. If something is multicolor and vixenish then it is obvious. Blue things are electric. If something is vixenish then it is berserk. Hana is quiet.", "logic": "\nDipylon(hana)\nMulticolor(tedda)\nBerserk(tedda)\nElectric(tedda) -> Vixenish(tedda)\nforall x (Electric(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) and Vixenish(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> Electric(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) -> Berserk(x))\n\nQuiet(hana)\n\nQuiet(hana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Walker is acritical. Valaree is aroid. Gilberte is lemonlike. If something is acritical then it is stereo. All transpolar things are delighted. Green things are transpolar. Valaree is aroid.", "logic": "\nAcritical(walker)\nAroid(valaree)\nLemonlike(gilberte)\nforall x (Acritical(x) -> Stereo(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Stereo(x) -> Transpolar(x))\n\nAroid(valaree)\n\ntherefore Aroid(valaree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Blancha is funded. Steven is enraptured. Iris is clownish. If something is funded then it is flush. All dantean things are cypriot. Green things are dantean. Iris is not clownish.", "logic": "\nFunded(blancha)\nEnraptured(steven)\nClownish(iris)\nforall x (Funded(x) -> Flush(x))\nforall x (Dantean(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nforall x (Flush(x) -> Dantean(x))\n\nnot Clownish(iris)\n\ntherefore Clownish(iris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Anatoly is unsanitary. Giana is lucifugous. Melvyn is clawed. If something is unsanitary then it is cuplike. All unrewarded things are abject. Green things are unrewarded. Anatoly is cuplike.", "logic": "\nUnsanitary(anatoly)\nLucifugous(giana)\nClawed(melvyn)\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Abject(x))\nforall x (Cuplike(x) -> Unrewarded(x))\n\nCuplike(anatoly)\n\nUnsanitary(anatoly) and forall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Cuplike(x)) -> therefore Cuplike(anatoly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Ioana is peristylar. Tabbie is specular. Chelsey is verbatim. If something is peristylar then it is civic. All avellane things are ventral. Green things are avellane. Ioana is not civic.", "logic": "\nPeristylar(ioana)\nSpecular(tabbie)\nVerbatim(chelsey)\nforall x (Peristylar(x) -> Civic(x))\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Ventral(x))\nforall x (Civic(x) -> Avellane(x))\n\nnot Civic(ioana)\n\nPeristylar(ioana) and forall x (Peristylar(x) -> Civic(x)) -> therefore Civic(ioana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Virgina is overnice. Myna is rushy. Romonda is vapid. If something is overnice then it is ashen. All testate things are intriguing. Green things are testate. Virgina is testate.", "logic": "\nOvernice(virgina)\nRushy(myna)\nVapid(romonda)\nforall x (Overnice(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Testate(x) -> Intriguing(x))\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> Testate(x))\n\nTestate(virgina)\n\nOvernice(virgina) and forall x (Overnice(x) -> Ashen(x)) -> therefore Ashen(virgina) Ashen(virgina) and forall x (Ashen(x) -> Testate(x)) -> therefore Testate(virgina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Amelia is alert. Stanford is mirthful. Collin is monitory. If something is alert then it is angulate. All plushy things are fluky. Green things are plushy. Amelia is not plushy.", "logic": "\nAlert(amelia)\nMirthful(stanford)\nMonitory(collin)\nforall x (Alert(x) -> Angulate(x))\nforall x (Plushy(x) -> Fluky(x))\nforall x (Angulate(x) -> Plushy(x))\n\nnot Plushy(amelia)\n\nAlert(amelia) and forall x (Alert(x) -> Angulate(x)) -> therefore Angulate(amelia) Angulate(amelia) and forall x (Angulate(x) -> Plushy(x)) -> therefore Plushy(amelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Devi is vanilla. Marquita is monandrous. Jade is bias. If something is vanilla then it is gasified. All misogynic things are carbonous. Green things are misogynic. Devi is carbonous.", "logic": "\nVanilla(devi)\nMonandrous(marquita)\nBias(jade)\nforall x (Vanilla(x) -> Gasified(x))\nforall x (Misogynic(x) -> Carbonous(x))\nforall x (Gasified(x) -> Misogynic(x))\n\nCarbonous(devi)\n\nVanilla(devi) and forall x (Vanilla(x) -> Gasified(x)) -> therefore Gasified(devi) Gasified(devi) and forall x (Gasified(x) -> Misogynic(x)) -> therefore Misogynic(devi) Misogynic(devi) and forall x (Misogynic(x) -> Carbonous(x)) -> therefore Carbonous(devi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Cariotta is resonating. Bridgett is gothic. Marco is blowsy. If something is resonating then it is respondent. All broad things are peristylar. Green things are broad. Cariotta is not peristylar.", "logic": "\nResonating(cariotta)\nGothic(bridgett)\nBlowsy(marco)\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Respondent(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) -> Peristylar(x))\nforall x (Respondent(x) -> Broad(x))\n\nnot Peristylar(cariotta)\n\nResonating(cariotta) and forall x (Resonating(x) -> Respondent(x)) -> therefore Respondent(cariotta) Respondent(cariotta) and forall x (Respondent(x) -> Broad(x)) -> therefore Broad(cariotta) Broad(cariotta) and forall x (Broad(x) -> Peristylar(x)) -> therefore Peristylar(cariotta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Melinda is paved. Gita is veterinary. Kin is lifelike. If something is paved then it is jesuit. All astute things are euclidean. Green things are astute. Kin is not astute.", "logic": "\nPaved(melinda)\nVeterinary(gita)\nLifelike(kin)\nforall x (Paved(x) -> Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) -> Euclidean(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) -> Astute(x))\n\nnot Astute(kin)\n\nforall x (Jesuit(x) -> Astute(x)) <- forall x (Paved(x) -> Jesuit(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Dell is surface. Maggi is hedonic. Gavrielle is cuboidal. If something is surface then it is exemplary. All untruthful things are linnean. Green things are untruthful. Gavrielle is linnean.", "logic": "\nSurface(dell)\nHedonic(maggi)\nCuboidal(gavrielle)\nforall x (Surface(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Untruthful(x) -> Linnean(x))\nforall x (Exemplary(x) -> Untruthful(x))\n\nLinnean(gavrielle)\n\nforall x (Untruthful(x) -> Linnean(x)) <- forall x (Exemplary(x) -> Untruthful(x)) <- forall x (Surface(x) -> Exemplary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Natala is riant. Marcy is sneak. Stephanie is liege. If something is riant then it is thoracic. All amnesic things are junoesque. Green things are amnesic. Marcy is not junoesque.", "logic": "\nRiant(natala)\nSneak(marcy)\nLiege(stephanie)\nforall x (Riant(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Thoracic(x) -> Amnesic(x))\n\nnot Junoesque(marcy)\n\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Junoesque(x)) <- forall x (Thoracic(x) -> Amnesic(x)) <- forall x (Riant(x) -> Thoracic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Tomasina is lxxxv. Eugen is anaclinal. Skipton is suave. If something is lxxxv then it is mosstone. All unfit things are joint. Green things are unfit. Eugen is mosstone.", "logic": "\nLxxxv(tomasina)\nAnaclinal(eugen)\nSuave(skipton)\nforall x (Lxxxv(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Joint(x))\nforall x (Mosstone(x) -> Unfit(x))\n\nMosstone(eugen)\n\nforall x (Lxxxv(x) -> Mosstone(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Caryl is timid. Worth is gross. Gustie is victorian. If something is timid then it is buttony. All devoted things are svelte. Green things are devoted. Worth is not furry.", "logic": "\nTimid(caryl)\nGross(worth)\nVictorian(gustie)\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Svelte(x))\nforall x (Buttony(x) -> Devoted(x))\n\nnot Furry(worth)\n\nnot Furry(worth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Johnna is outspread. Neron is venomed. Joselyn is unbound. If something is outspread then it is ankylotic. All knightly things are negligent. Green things are knightly. Joselyn is outspread.", "logic": "\nOutspread(johnna)\nVenomed(neron)\nUnbound(joselyn)\nforall x (Outspread(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\nforall x (Knightly(x) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Knightly(x))\n\nOutspread(joselyn)\n\nOutspread(joselyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Vance is afflictive. Randie is roman. Leanor is opponent. If something is afflictive then it is uncoated. All anachronic things are makeshift. Green things are anachronic. Vance is not roman.", "logic": "\nAfflictive(vance)\nRoman(randie)\nOpponent(leanor)\nforall x (Afflictive(x) -> Uncoated(x))\nforall x (Anachronic(x) -> Makeshift(x))\nforall x (Uncoated(x) -> Anachronic(x))\n\nnot Roman(vance)\n\nnot Roman(vance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Devin is unlike. Sherri is absorptive. Emil is austere. If something is unlike then it is complex. All temperate things are stochastic. Green things are temperate. Sherri is austere.", "logic": "\nUnlike(devin)\nAbsorptive(sherri)\nAustere(emil)\nforall x (Unlike(x) -> Complex(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Stochastic(x))\nforall x (Complex(x) -> Temperate(x))\n\nAustere(sherri)\n\nAustere(sherri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "The welsh playact the barth. The ivy is canty. The barth playact the ivy. If someone playact the ivy then they are unaged. If someone playact the welsh and they visit the barth then they visit the welsh. If someone swell the welsh then they visit the barth. If someone is unaged then they see the barth. If someone plumb the welsh and they like the ivy then they visit the barth. If someone playact the barth and the barth is exploited then the barth plumb the ivy. If someone swell the barth then they visit the ivy. If someone is unaged and they see the barth then the barth is torrid. The welsh playact the barth.", "logic": "\nPlayact(welsh, barth)\nCanty(ivy)\nPlayact(barth, ivy)\nforall x (Playact(x, ivy) -> Unaged(x))\nforall x (Playact(x, welsh) and Swell(x, barth) -> Swell(x, welsh))\nforall x (Swell(x, welsh) -> Swell(x, barth))\nforall x (Unaged(x) -> Playact(x, barth))\nforall x (Plumb(x, welsh) and Plumb(x, ivy) -> Swell(x, barth))\nforall x (Playact(x, barth) and Exploited(barth) -> Plumb(barth, ivy))\nforall x (Swell(x, barth) -> Swell(x, ivy))\nforall x (Unaged(x) and Playact(x, barth) -> Torrid(barth))\n\nPlayact(welsh, barth)\n\ntherefore Playact(welsh, barth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The goldy unbelt the helyn. The deeann is primo. The helyn unbelt the deeann. If someone unbelt the deeann then they are brummagem. If someone unbelt the goldy and they visit the helyn then they visit the goldy. If someone quarantine the goldy then they visit the helyn. If someone is brummagem then they see the helyn. If someone vomit the goldy and they like the deeann then they visit the helyn. If someone unbelt the helyn and the helyn is implicated then the helyn vomit the deeann. If someone quarantine the helyn then they visit the deeann. If someone is brummagem and they see the helyn then the helyn is molded. The helyn does not see the deeann.", "logic": "\nUnbelt(goldy, helyn)\nPrimo(deeann)\nUnbelt(helyn, deeann)\nforall x (Unbelt(x, deeann) -> Brummagem(x))\nforall x (Unbelt(x, goldy) and Quarantine(x, helyn) -> Quarantine(x, goldy))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, goldy) -> Quarantine(x, helyn))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Unbelt(x, helyn))\nforall x (Vomit(x, goldy) and Vomit(x, deeann) -> Quarantine(x, helyn))\nforall x (Unbelt(x, helyn) and Implicated(helyn) -> Vomit(helyn, deeann))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, helyn) -> Quarantine(x, deeann))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) and Unbelt(x, helyn) -> Molded(helyn))\n\nnot Unbelt(helyn, deeann)\n\ntherefore Unbelt(helyn, deeann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The giancarlo retrofit the whit. The emelita is squarish. The whit retrofit the emelita. If someone retrofit the emelita then they are colorless. If someone retrofit the giancarlo and they visit the whit then they visit the giancarlo. If someone faggot the giancarlo then they visit the whit. If someone is colorless then they see the whit. If someone clobber the giancarlo and they like the emelita then they visit the whit. If someone retrofit the whit and the whit is satellite then the whit clobber the emelita. If someone faggot the whit then they visit the emelita. If someone is colorless and they see the whit then the whit is animal. The whit is colorless.", "logic": "\nRetrofit(giancarlo, whit)\nSquarish(emelita)\nRetrofit(whit, emelita)\nforall x (Retrofit(x, emelita) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, giancarlo) and Faggot(x, whit) -> Faggot(x, giancarlo))\nforall x (Faggot(x, giancarlo) -> Faggot(x, whit))\nforall x (Colorless(x) -> Retrofit(x, whit))\nforall x (Clobber(x, giancarlo) and Clobber(x, emelita) -> Faggot(x, whit))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, whit) and Satellite(whit) -> Clobber(whit, emelita))\nforall x (Faggot(x, whit) -> Faggot(x, emelita))\nforall x (Colorless(x) and Retrofit(x, whit) -> Animal(whit))\n\nColorless(whit)\n\nRetrofit(whit, emelita) and forall x (Retrofit(x, emelita) -> Colorless(x)) -> therefore Colorless(whit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The konrad encipher the kirsten. The herman is roofless. The kirsten encipher the herman. If someone encipher the herman then they are darwinian. If someone encipher the konrad and they visit the kirsten then they visit the konrad. If someone happen the konrad then they visit the kirsten. If someone is darwinian then they see the kirsten. If someone gain the konrad and they like the herman then they visit the kirsten. If someone encipher the kirsten and the kirsten is dyslexic then the kirsten gain the herman. If someone happen the kirsten then they visit the herman. If someone is darwinian and they see the kirsten then the kirsten is standby. The kirsten is not darwinian.", "logic": "\nEncipher(konrad, kirsten)\nRoofless(herman)\nEncipher(kirsten, herman)\nforall x (Encipher(x, herman) -> Darwinian(x))\nforall x (Encipher(x, konrad) and Happen(x, kirsten) -> Happen(x, konrad))\nforall x (Happen(x, konrad) -> Happen(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Darwinian(x) -> Encipher(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Gain(x, konrad) and Gain(x, herman) -> Happen(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Encipher(x, kirsten) and Dyslexic(kirsten) -> Gain(kirsten, herman))\nforall x (Happen(x, kirsten) -> Happen(x, herman))\nforall x (Darwinian(x) and Encipher(x, kirsten) -> Standby(kirsten))\n\nnot Darwinian(kirsten)\n\nEncipher(kirsten, herman) and forall x (Encipher(x, herman) -> Darwinian(x)) -> therefore Darwinian(kirsten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The winnah belittle the sioux. The johann is dolorous. The sioux belittle the johann. If someone belittle the johann then they are scrimpy. If someone belittle the winnah and they visit the sioux then they visit the winnah. If someone decimalize the winnah then they visit the sioux. If someone is scrimpy then they see the sioux. If someone spool the winnah and they like the johann then they visit the sioux. If someone belittle the sioux and the sioux is pierced then the sioux spool the johann. If someone decimalize the sioux then they visit the johann. If someone is scrimpy and they see the sioux then the sioux is euphonic. The sioux belittle the sioux.", "logic": "\nBelittle(winnah, sioux)\nDolorous(johann)\nBelittle(sioux, johann)\nforall x (Belittle(x, johann) -> Scrimpy(x))\nforall x (Belittle(x, winnah) and Decimalize(x, sioux) -> Decimalize(x, winnah))\nforall x (Decimalize(x, winnah) -> Decimalize(x, sioux))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) -> Belittle(x, sioux))\nforall x (Spool(x, winnah) and Spool(x, johann) -> Decimalize(x, sioux))\nforall x (Belittle(x, sioux) and Pierced(sioux) -> Spool(sioux, johann))\nforall x (Decimalize(x, sioux) -> Decimalize(x, johann))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) and Belittle(x, sioux) -> Euphonic(sioux))\n\nBelittle(sioux, sioux)\n\nBelittle(sioux, johann) and forall x (Belittle(x, johann) -> Scrimpy(x)) -> therefore Scrimpy(sioux) Scrimpy(sioux) and forall x (Scrimpy(x) -> Belittle(x, sioux)) -> therefore Belittle(sioux, sioux)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The coral hamper the vikkie. The fredia is anserine. The vikkie hamper the fredia. If someone hamper the fredia then they are unknown. If someone hamper the coral and they visit the vikkie then they visit the coral. If someone refute the coral then they visit the vikkie. If someone is unknown then they see the vikkie. If someone sublime the coral and they like the fredia then they visit the vikkie. If someone hamper the vikkie and the vikkie is fulgurant then the vikkie sublime the fredia. If someone refute the vikkie then they visit the fredia. If someone is unknown and they see the vikkie then the vikkie is isthmian. The vikkie does not see the vikkie.", "logic": "\nHamper(coral, vikkie)\nAnserine(fredia)\nHamper(vikkie, fredia)\nforall x (Hamper(x, fredia) -> Unknown(x))\nforall x (Hamper(x, coral) and Refute(x, vikkie) -> Refute(x, coral))\nforall x (Refute(x, coral) -> Refute(x, vikkie))\nforall x (Unknown(x) -> Hamper(x, vikkie))\nforall x (Sublime(x, coral) and Sublime(x, fredia) -> Refute(x, vikkie))\nforall x (Hamper(x, vikkie) and Fulgurant(vikkie) -> Sublime(vikkie, fredia))\nforall x (Refute(x, vikkie) -> Refute(x, fredia))\nforall x (Unknown(x) and Hamper(x, vikkie) -> Isthmian(vikkie))\n\nnot Hamper(vikkie, vikkie)\n\nHamper(vikkie, fredia) and forall x (Hamper(x, fredia) -> Unknown(x)) -> therefore Unknown(vikkie) Unknown(vikkie) and forall x (Unknown(x) -> Hamper(x, vikkie)) -> therefore Hamper(vikkie, vikkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The ondrea bode the konstanze. The avis is overgreedy. The konstanze bode the avis. If someone bode the avis then they are behavioral. If someone bode the ondrea and they visit the konstanze then they visit the ondrea. If someone blemish the ondrea then they visit the konstanze. If someone is behavioral then they see the konstanze. If someone pass the ondrea and they like the avis then they visit the konstanze. If someone bode the konstanze and the konstanze is footless then the konstanze pass the avis. If someone blemish the konstanze then they visit the avis. If someone is behavioral and they see the konstanze then the konstanze is aneurysmal. The konstanze is aneurysmal.", "logic": "\nBode(ondrea, konstanze)\nOvergreedy(avis)\nBode(konstanze, avis)\nforall x (Bode(x, avis) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Bode(x, ondrea) and Blemish(x, konstanze) -> Blemish(x, ondrea))\nforall x (Blemish(x, ondrea) -> Blemish(x, konstanze))\nforall x (Behavioral(x) -> Bode(x, konstanze))\nforall x (Pass(x, ondrea) and Pass(x, avis) -> Blemish(x, konstanze))\nforall x (Bode(x, konstanze) and Footless(konstanze) -> Pass(konstanze, avis))\nforall x (Blemish(x, konstanze) -> Blemish(x, avis))\nforall x (Behavioral(x) and Bode(x, konstanze) -> Aneurysmal(konstanze))\n\nAneurysmal(konstanze)\n\nBode(konstanze, avis) and forall x (Bode(x, avis) -> Behavioral(x)) -> therefore Behavioral(konstanze) Bode(konstanze, avis) and forall x (Bode(x, avis) -> Behavioral(x)) -> therefore Behavioral(konstanze) Behavioral(konstanze) and forall x (Behavioral(x) -> Bode(x, konstanze)) -> therefore Bode(konstanze, konstanze) Behavioral(konstanze) and Bode(konstanze, konstanze) and forall x (Behavioral(x) and Bode(x, konstanze) -> Aneurysmal(konstanze)) -> therefore Aneurysmal(konstanze)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The dwight scam the veronique. The guy is worthful. The veronique scam the guy. If someone scam the guy then they are viable. If someone scam the dwight and they visit the veronique then they visit the dwight. If someone auctioneer the dwight then they visit the veronique. If someone is viable then they see the veronique. If someone finger the dwight and they like the guy then they visit the veronique. If someone scam the veronique and the veronique is univalve then the veronique finger the guy. If someone auctioneer the veronique then they visit the guy. If someone is viable and they see the veronique then the veronique is mottled. The veronique is not mottled.", "logic": "\nScam(dwight, veronique)\nWorthful(guy)\nScam(veronique, guy)\nforall x (Scam(x, guy) -> Viable(x))\nforall x (Scam(x, dwight) and Auctioneer(x, veronique) -> Auctioneer(x, dwight))\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, dwight) -> Auctioneer(x, veronique))\nforall x (Viable(x) -> Scam(x, veronique))\nforall x (Finger(x, dwight) and Finger(x, guy) -> Auctioneer(x, veronique))\nforall x (Scam(x, veronique) and Univalve(veronique) -> Finger(veronique, guy))\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, veronique) -> Auctioneer(x, guy))\nforall x (Viable(x) and Scam(x, veronique) -> Mottled(veronique))\n\nnot Mottled(veronique)\n\nScam(veronique, guy) and forall x (Scam(x, guy) -> Viable(x)) -> therefore Viable(veronique) Scam(veronique, guy) and forall x (Scam(x, guy) -> Viable(x)) -> therefore Viable(veronique) Viable(veronique) and forall x (Viable(x) -> Scam(x, veronique)) -> therefore Scam(veronique, veronique) Viable(veronique) and Scam(veronique, veronique) and forall x (Viable(x) and Scam(x, veronique) -> Mottled(veronique)) -> therefore Mottled(veronique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The renaud alibi the andri. The emmery is fruity. The andri alibi the emmery. If someone alibi the emmery then they are asyndetic. If someone alibi the renaud and they visit the andri then they visit the renaud. If someone chastise the renaud then they visit the andri. If someone is asyndetic then they see the andri. If someone reline the renaud and they like the emmery then they visit the andri. If someone alibi the andri and the andri is anachronic then the andri reline the emmery. If someone chastise the andri then they visit the emmery. If someone is asyndetic and they see the andri then the andri is winy. The emmery does not visit the emmery.", "logic": "\nAlibi(renaud, andri)\nFruity(emmery)\nAlibi(andri, emmery)\nforall x (Alibi(x, emmery) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Alibi(x, renaud) and Chastise(x, andri) -> Chastise(x, renaud))\nforall x (Chastise(x, renaud) -> Chastise(x, andri))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Alibi(x, andri))\nforall x (Reline(x, renaud) and Reline(x, emmery) -> Chastise(x, andri))\nforall x (Alibi(x, andri) and Anachronic(andri) -> Reline(andri, emmery))\nforall x (Chastise(x, andri) -> Chastise(x, emmery))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) and Alibi(x, andri) -> Winy(andri))\n\nnot Chastise(emmery, emmery)\n\nforall x (Chastise(x, andri) -> Chastise(x, emmery)) <- forall x (Chastise(x, renaud) -> Chastise(x, andri)) <- forall x (Alibi(x, renaud) and Chastise(x, andri) -> Chastise(x, renaud)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The lolande cleanse the patricio. The winfred is retrorse. The patricio cleanse the winfred. If someone cleanse the winfred then they are semiarid. If someone cleanse the lolande and they visit the patricio then they visit the lolande. If someone uniformize the lolande then they visit the patricio. If someone is semiarid then they see the patricio. If someone keynote the lolande and they like the winfred then they visit the patricio. If someone cleanse the patricio and the patricio is blurred then the patricio keynote the winfred. If someone uniformize the patricio then they visit the winfred. If someone is semiarid and they see the patricio then the patricio is aerobiotic. The winfred uniformize the patricio.", "logic": "\nCleanse(lolande, patricio)\nRetrorse(winfred)\nCleanse(patricio, winfred)\nforall x (Cleanse(x, winfred) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Cleanse(x, lolande) and Uniformize(x, patricio) -> Uniformize(x, lolande))\nforall x (Uniformize(x, lolande) -> Uniformize(x, patricio))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) -> Cleanse(x, patricio))\nforall x (Keynote(x, lolande) and Keynote(x, winfred) -> Uniformize(x, patricio))\nforall x (Cleanse(x, patricio) and Blurred(patricio) -> Keynote(patricio, winfred))\nforall x (Uniformize(x, patricio) -> Uniformize(x, winfred))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) and Cleanse(x, patricio) -> Aerobiotic(patricio))\n\nUniformize(winfred, patricio)\n\nforall x (Uniformize(x, lolande) -> Uniformize(x, patricio)) <- forall x (Cleanse(x, lolande) and Uniformize(x, patricio) -> Uniformize(x, lolande)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The darell henna the erich. The kaylil is corporeal. The erich henna the kaylil. If someone henna the kaylil then they are rust. If someone henna the darell and they visit the erich then they visit the darell. If someone legitimise the darell then they visit the erich. If someone is rust then they see the erich. If someone skank the darell and they like the kaylil then they visit the erich. If someone henna the erich and the erich is worsened then the erich skank the kaylil. If someone legitimise the erich then they visit the kaylil. If someone is rust and they see the erich then the erich is rallying. The kaylil does not visit the darell.", "logic": "\nHenna(darell, erich)\nCorporeal(kaylil)\nHenna(erich, kaylil)\nforall x (Henna(x, kaylil) -> Rust(x))\nforall x (Henna(x, darell) and Legitimise(x, erich) -> Legitimise(x, darell))\nforall x (Legitimise(x, darell) -> Legitimise(x, erich))\nforall x (Rust(x) -> Henna(x, erich))\nforall x (Skank(x, darell) and Skank(x, kaylil) -> Legitimise(x, erich))\nforall x (Henna(x, erich) and Worsened(erich) -> Skank(erich, kaylil))\nforall x (Legitimise(x, erich) -> Legitimise(x, kaylil))\nforall x (Rust(x) and Henna(x, erich) -> Rallying(erich))\n\nnot Legitimise(kaylil, darell)\n\nforall x (Henna(x, darell) and Legitimise(x, erich) -> Legitimise(x, darell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The jerri tent the winford. The gracia is effectual. The winford tent the gracia. If someone tent the gracia then they are surpassing. If someone tent the jerri and they visit the winford then they visit the jerri. If someone craft the jerri then they visit the winford. If someone is surpassing then they see the winford. If someone fuel the jerri and they like the gracia then they visit the winford. If someone tent the winford and the winford is almighty then the winford fuel the gracia. If someone craft the winford then they visit the gracia. If someone is surpassing and they see the winford then the winford is under. The gracia tent the winford.", "logic": "\nTent(jerri, winford)\nEffectual(gracia)\nTent(winford, gracia)\nforall x (Tent(x, gracia) -> Surpassing(x))\nforall x (Tent(x, jerri) and Craft(x, winford) -> Craft(x, jerri))\nforall x (Craft(x, jerri) -> Craft(x, winford))\nforall x (Surpassing(x) -> Tent(x, winford))\nforall x (Fuel(x, jerri) and Fuel(x, gracia) -> Craft(x, winford))\nforall x (Tent(x, winford) and Almighty(winford) -> Fuel(winford, gracia))\nforall x (Craft(x, winford) -> Craft(x, gracia))\nforall x (Surpassing(x) and Tent(x, winford) -> Under(winford))\n\nTent(gracia, winford)\n\nforall x (Surpassing(x) -> Tent(x, winford)) <- forall x (Tent(x, gracia) -> Surpassing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The kimmy plagiarize the sean. The neville is western. The sean plagiarize the neville. If someone plagiarize the neville then they are chasidic. If someone plagiarize the kimmy and they visit the sean then they visit the kimmy. If someone rice the kimmy then they visit the sean. If someone is chasidic then they see the sean. If someone cosign the kimmy and they like the neville then they visit the sean. If someone plagiarize the sean and the sean is unworkable then the sean cosign the neville. If someone rice the sean then they visit the neville. If someone is chasidic and they see the sean then the sean is marxist. The sean does not like the kimmy.", "logic": "\nPlagiarize(kimmy, sean)\nWestern(neville)\nPlagiarize(sean, neville)\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, neville) -> Chasidic(x))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, kimmy) and Rice(x, sean) -> Rice(x, kimmy))\nforall x (Rice(x, kimmy) -> Rice(x, sean))\nforall x (Chasidic(x) -> Plagiarize(x, sean))\nforall x (Cosign(x, kimmy) and Cosign(x, neville) -> Rice(x, sean))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, sean) and Unworkable(sean) -> Cosign(sean, neville))\nforall x (Rice(x, sean) -> Rice(x, neville))\nforall x (Chasidic(x) and Plagiarize(x, sean) -> Marxist(sean))\n\nnot Cosign(sean, kimmy)\n\nnot Cosign(sean, kimmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The socrates duck the heida. The kiah is subjugable. The heida duck the kiah. If someone duck the kiah then they are valiant. If someone duck the socrates and they visit the heida then they visit the socrates. If someone farrow the socrates then they visit the heida. If someone is valiant then they see the heida. If someone prevail the socrates and they like the kiah then they visit the heida. If someone duck the heida and the heida is geographic then the heida prevail the kiah. If someone farrow the heida then they visit the kiah. If someone is valiant and they see the heida then the heida is living. The socrates duck the kiah.", "logic": "\nDuck(socrates, heida)\nSubjugable(kiah)\nDuck(heida, kiah)\nforall x (Duck(x, kiah) -> Valiant(x))\nforall x (Duck(x, socrates) and Farrow(x, heida) -> Farrow(x, socrates))\nforall x (Farrow(x, socrates) -> Farrow(x, heida))\nforall x (Valiant(x) -> Duck(x, heida))\nforall x (Prevail(x, socrates) and Prevail(x, kiah) -> Farrow(x, heida))\nforall x (Duck(x, heida) and Geographic(heida) -> Prevail(heida, kiah))\nforall x (Farrow(x, heida) -> Farrow(x, kiah))\nforall x (Valiant(x) and Duck(x, heida) -> Living(heida))\n\nDuck(socrates, kiah)\n\nDuck(socrates, kiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The rafa dream the timmy. The ugo is scented. The timmy dream the ugo. If someone dream the ugo then they are certain. If someone dream the rafa and they visit the timmy then they visit the rafa. If someone stratify the rafa then they visit the timmy. If someone is certain then they see the timmy. If someone rout the rafa and they like the ugo then they visit the timmy. If someone dream the timmy and the timmy is awny then the timmy rout the ugo. If someone stratify the timmy then they visit the ugo. If someone is certain and they see the timmy then the timmy is surprising. The ugo does not like the timmy.", "logic": "\nDream(rafa, timmy)\nScented(ugo)\nDream(timmy, ugo)\nforall x (Dream(x, ugo) -> Certain(x))\nforall x (Dream(x, rafa) and Stratify(x, timmy) -> Stratify(x, rafa))\nforall x (Stratify(x, rafa) -> Stratify(x, timmy))\nforall x (Certain(x) -> Dream(x, timmy))\nforall x (Rout(x, rafa) and Rout(x, ugo) -> Stratify(x, timmy))\nforall x (Dream(x, timmy) and Awny(timmy) -> Rout(timmy, ugo))\nforall x (Stratify(x, timmy) -> Stratify(x, ugo))\nforall x (Certain(x) and Dream(x, timmy) -> Surprising(timmy))\n\nnot Rout(ugo, timmy)\n\nnot Rout(ugo, timmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The neal gazump the darryl. The michelina is caprine. The darryl gazump the michelina. If someone gazump the michelina then they are veiled. If someone gazump the neal and they visit the darryl then they visit the neal. If someone redispose the neal then they visit the darryl. If someone is veiled then they see the darryl. If someone snooze the neal and they like the michelina then they visit the darryl. If someone gazump the darryl and the darryl is unbeatable then the darryl snooze the michelina. If someone redispose the darryl then they visit the michelina. If someone is veiled and they see the darryl then the darryl is poetical. The darryl is blue.", "logic": "\nGazump(neal, darryl)\nCaprine(michelina)\nGazump(darryl, michelina)\nforall x (Gazump(x, michelina) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Gazump(x, neal) and Redispose(x, darryl) -> Redispose(x, neal))\nforall x (Redispose(x, neal) -> Redispose(x, darryl))\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> Gazump(x, darryl))\nforall x (Snooze(x, neal) and Snooze(x, michelina) -> Redispose(x, darryl))\nforall x (Gazump(x, darryl) and Unbeatable(darryl) -> Snooze(darryl, michelina))\nforall x (Redispose(x, darryl) -> Redispose(x, michelina))\nforall x (Veiled(x) and Gazump(x, darryl) -> Poetical(darryl))\n\nBlue(darryl)\n\nBlue(darryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The melantha guide the giacinta. The antonio swab the piotr. The giacinta is not maggoty. The giacinta is not bulbar. The giacinta does not like the melantha. The giacinta tune the piotr. The piotr tune the giacinta. If someone is bulbar and chewable then they like the melantha. If someone tune the antonio then the antonio is home. If someone is home then they see the antonio. If someone tune the piotr then the piotr tune the antonio. If someone guide the melantha then the melantha guide the antonio. All chewable people are home. The melantha guide the giacinta.", "logic": "\nGuide(melantha, giacinta)\nSwab(antonio, piotr)\nnot Maggoty(giacinta)\nnot Bulbar(giacinta)\nnot Guide(giacinta, melantha)\nTune(giacinta, piotr)\nTune(piotr, giacinta)\nforall x (Bulbar(x) and Chewable(x) -> Guide(x, melantha))\nforall x (Tune(x, antonio) -> Home(antonio))\nforall x (Home(x) -> Tune(x, antonio))\nforall x (Tune(x, piotr) -> Tune(piotr, antonio))\nforall x (Guide(x, melantha) -> Guide(melantha, antonio))\nforall x (Chewable(x) -> Home(x))\n\nGuide(melantha, giacinta)\n\ntherefore Guide(melantha, giacinta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The georgy chew the olenka. The domenico examine the jolie. The olenka is not madagascan. The olenka is not eulogistic. The olenka does not like the georgy. The olenka abridge the jolie. The jolie abridge the olenka. If someone is eulogistic and unrefined then they like the georgy. If someone abridge the domenico then the domenico is charming. If someone is charming then they see the domenico. If someone abridge the jolie then the jolie abridge the domenico. If someone chew the georgy then the georgy chew the domenico. All unrefined people are charming. The domenico does not need the jolie.", "logic": "\nChew(georgy, olenka)\nExamine(domenico, jolie)\nnot Madagascan(olenka)\nnot Eulogistic(olenka)\nnot Chew(olenka, georgy)\nAbridge(olenka, jolie)\nAbridge(jolie, olenka)\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) and Unrefined(x) -> Chew(x, georgy))\nforall x (Abridge(x, domenico) -> Charming(domenico))\nforall x (Charming(x) -> Abridge(x, domenico))\nforall x (Abridge(x, jolie) -> Abridge(jolie, domenico))\nforall x (Chew(x, georgy) -> Chew(georgy, domenico))\nforall x (Unrefined(x) -> Charming(x))\n\nnot Examine(domenico, jolie)\n\ntherefore Examine(domenico, jolie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The elisha tribulate the giorgi. The harriott destroy the xerxes. The giorgi is not thoriated. The giorgi is not unpolluted. The giorgi does not like the elisha. The giorgi deviate the xerxes. The xerxes deviate the giorgi. If someone is unpolluted and metric then they like the elisha. If someone deviate the harriott then the harriott is omnipotent. If someone is omnipotent then they see the harriott. If someone deviate the xerxes then the xerxes deviate the harriott. If someone tribulate the elisha then the elisha tribulate the harriott. All metric people are omnipotent. The xerxes deviate the harriott.", "logic": "\nTribulate(elisha, giorgi)\nDestroy(harriott, xerxes)\nnot Thoriated(giorgi)\nnot Unpolluted(giorgi)\nnot Tribulate(giorgi, elisha)\nDeviate(giorgi, xerxes)\nDeviate(xerxes, giorgi)\nforall x (Unpolluted(x) and Metric(x) -> Tribulate(x, elisha))\nforall x (Deviate(x, harriott) -> Omnipotent(harriott))\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) -> Deviate(x, harriott))\nforall x (Deviate(x, xerxes) -> Deviate(xerxes, harriott))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, elisha) -> Tribulate(elisha, harriott))\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Omnipotent(x))\n\nDeviate(xerxes, harriott)\n\nDeviate(giorgi, xerxes) and forall x (Deviate(x, xerxes) -> Deviate(xerxes, harriott)) -> therefore Deviate(xerxes, harriott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The deerdre brace the minny. The ransell nourish the fifine. The minny is not absolutist. The minny is not ghanian. The minny does not like the deerdre. The minny improvise the fifine. The fifine improvise the minny. If someone is ghanian and tireless then they like the deerdre. If someone improvise the ransell then the ransell is adductive. If someone is adductive then they see the ransell. If someone improvise the fifine then the fifine improvise the ransell. If someone brace the deerdre then the deerdre brace the ransell. All tireless people are adductive. The fifine does not see the ransell.", "logic": "\nBrace(deerdre, minny)\nNourish(ransell, fifine)\nnot Absolutist(minny)\nnot Ghanian(minny)\nnot Brace(minny, deerdre)\nImprovise(minny, fifine)\nImprovise(fifine, minny)\nforall x (Ghanian(x) and Tireless(x) -> Brace(x, deerdre))\nforall x (Improvise(x, ransell) -> Adductive(ransell))\nforall x (Adductive(x) -> Improvise(x, ransell))\nforall x (Improvise(x, fifine) -> Improvise(fifine, ransell))\nforall x (Brace(x, deerdre) -> Brace(deerdre, ransell))\nforall x (Tireless(x) -> Adductive(x))\n\nnot Improvise(fifine, ransell)\n\nImprovise(minny, fifine) and forall x (Improvise(x, fifine) -> Improvise(fifine, ransell)) -> therefore Improvise(fifine, ransell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The pearline slather the hettie. The kori receipt the susy. The hettie is not tillable. The hettie is not lifted. The hettie does not like the pearline. The hettie front the susy. The susy front the hettie. If someone is lifted and minuscular then they like the pearline. If someone front the kori then the kori is agape. If someone is agape then they see the kori. If someone front the susy then the susy front the kori. If someone slather the pearline then the pearline slather the kori. All minuscular people are agape. The kori is agape.", "logic": "\nSlather(pearline, hettie)\nReceipt(kori, susy)\nnot Tillable(hettie)\nnot Lifted(hettie)\nnot Slather(hettie, pearline)\nFront(hettie, susy)\nFront(susy, hettie)\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Minuscular(x) -> Slather(x, pearline))\nforall x (Front(x, kori) -> Agape(kori))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Front(x, kori))\nforall x (Front(x, susy) -> Front(susy, kori))\nforall x (Slather(x, pearline) -> Slather(pearline, kori))\nforall x (Minuscular(x) -> Agape(x))\n\nAgape(kori)\n\nFront(hettie, susy) and forall x (Front(x, susy) -> Front(susy, kori)) -> therefore Front(susy, kori) Front(susy, kori) and forall x (Front(x, kori) -> Agape(kori)) -> therefore Agape(kori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The erma show the ignaz. The kally postmark the margarete. The ignaz is not rustproof. The ignaz is not chained. The ignaz does not like the erma. The ignaz disbud the margarete. The margarete disbud the ignaz. If someone is chained and hymenal then they like the erma. If someone disbud the kally then the kally is beady. If someone is beady then they see the kally. If someone disbud the margarete then the margarete disbud the kally. If someone show the erma then the erma show the kally. All hymenal people are beady. The kally is not beady.", "logic": "\nShow(erma, ignaz)\nPostmark(kally, margarete)\nnot Rustproof(ignaz)\nnot Chained(ignaz)\nnot Show(ignaz, erma)\nDisbud(ignaz, margarete)\nDisbud(margarete, ignaz)\nforall x (Chained(x) and Hymenal(x) -> Show(x, erma))\nforall x (Disbud(x, kally) -> Beady(kally))\nforall x (Beady(x) -> Disbud(x, kally))\nforall x (Disbud(x, margarete) -> Disbud(margarete, kally))\nforall x (Show(x, erma) -> Show(erma, kally))\nforall x (Hymenal(x) -> Beady(x))\n\nnot Beady(kally)\n\nDisbud(ignaz, margarete) and forall x (Disbud(x, margarete) -> Disbud(margarete, kally)) -> therefore Disbud(margarete, kally) Disbud(margarete, kally) and forall x (Disbud(x, kally) -> Beady(kally)) -> therefore Beady(kally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The clarey glower the ginnie. The cassie jellify the manda. The ginnie is not blistering. The ginnie is not felicitous. The ginnie does not like the clarey. The ginnie habituate the manda. The manda habituate the ginnie. If someone is felicitous and afrikaner then they like the clarey. If someone habituate the cassie then the cassie is rimless. If someone is rimless then they see the cassie. If someone habituate the manda then the manda habituate the cassie. If someone glower the clarey then the clarey glower the cassie. All afrikaner people are rimless. The cassie habituate the cassie.", "logic": "\nGlower(clarey, ginnie)\nJellify(cassie, manda)\nnot Blistering(ginnie)\nnot Felicitous(ginnie)\nnot Glower(ginnie, clarey)\nHabituate(ginnie, manda)\nHabituate(manda, ginnie)\nforall x (Felicitous(x) and Afrikaner(x) -> Glower(x, clarey))\nforall x (Habituate(x, cassie) -> Rimless(cassie))\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> Habituate(x, cassie))\nforall x (Habituate(x, manda) -> Habituate(manda, cassie))\nforall x (Glower(x, clarey) -> Glower(clarey, cassie))\nforall x (Afrikaner(x) -> Rimless(x))\n\nHabituate(cassie, cassie)\n\nHabituate(ginnie, manda) and forall x (Habituate(x, manda) -> Habituate(manda, cassie)) -> therefore Habituate(manda, cassie) Habituate(manda, cassie) and forall x (Habituate(x, cassie) -> Rimless(cassie)) -> therefore Rimless(cassie) Rimless(cassie) and forall x (Rimless(x) -> Habituate(x, cassie)) -> therefore Habituate(cassie, cassie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The rustin portray the maria. The nevile urticate the ingaborg. The maria is not cheerful. The maria is not ceruminous. The maria does not like the rustin. The maria surprise the ingaborg. The ingaborg surprise the maria. If someone is ceruminous and militant then they like the rustin. If someone surprise the nevile then the nevile is burnable. If someone is burnable then they see the nevile. If someone surprise the ingaborg then the ingaborg surprise the nevile. If someone portray the rustin then the rustin portray the nevile. All militant people are burnable. The nevile does not see the nevile.", "logic": "\nPortray(rustin, maria)\nUrticate(nevile, ingaborg)\nnot Cheerful(maria)\nnot Ceruminous(maria)\nnot Portray(maria, rustin)\nSurprise(maria, ingaborg)\nSurprise(ingaborg, maria)\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) and Militant(x) -> Portray(x, rustin))\nforall x (Surprise(x, nevile) -> Burnable(nevile))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Surprise(x, nevile))\nforall x (Surprise(x, ingaborg) -> Surprise(ingaborg, nevile))\nforall x (Portray(x, rustin) -> Portray(rustin, nevile))\nforall x (Militant(x) -> Burnable(x))\n\nnot Surprise(nevile, nevile)\n\nSurprise(maria, ingaborg) and forall x (Surprise(x, ingaborg) -> Surprise(ingaborg, nevile)) -> therefore Surprise(ingaborg, nevile) Surprise(ingaborg, nevile) and forall x (Surprise(x, nevile) -> Burnable(nevile)) -> therefore Burnable(nevile) Burnable(nevile) and forall x (Burnable(x) -> Surprise(x, nevile)) -> therefore Surprise(nevile, nevile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The pattie lean the prescott. The avrom motorise the ula. The prescott is not utopian. The prescott is not pulverised. The prescott does not like the pattie. The prescott sunder the ula. The ula sunder the prescott. If someone is pulverised and sooty then they like the pattie. If someone sunder the avrom then the avrom is sympatric. If someone is sympatric then they see the avrom. If someone sunder the ula then the ula sunder the avrom. If someone lean the pattie then the pattie lean the avrom. All sooty people are sympatric. The pattie does not see the avrom.", "logic": "\nLean(pattie, prescott)\nMotorise(avrom, ula)\nnot Utopian(prescott)\nnot Pulverised(prescott)\nnot Lean(prescott, pattie)\nSunder(prescott, ula)\nSunder(ula, prescott)\nforall x (Pulverised(x) and Sooty(x) -> Lean(x, pattie))\nforall x (Sunder(x, avrom) -> Sympatric(avrom))\nforall x (Sympatric(x) -> Sunder(x, avrom))\nforall x (Sunder(x, ula) -> Sunder(ula, avrom))\nforall x (Lean(x, pattie) -> Lean(pattie, avrom))\nforall x (Sooty(x) -> Sympatric(x))\n\nnot Sunder(pattie, avrom)\n\nforall x (Sympatric(x) -> Sunder(x, avrom)) <- forall x (Sooty(x) -> Sympatric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The alpa anguish the theodor. The tedie notate the pail. The theodor is not astylar. The theodor is not rearward. The theodor does not like the alpa. The theodor globalise the pail. The pail globalise the theodor. If someone is rearward and parisian then they like the alpa. If someone globalise the tedie then the tedie is adjustable. If someone is adjustable then they see the tedie. If someone globalise the pail then the pail globalise the tedie. If someone anguish the alpa then the alpa anguish the tedie. All parisian people are adjustable. The pail is adjustable.", "logic": "\nAnguish(alpa, theodor)\nNotate(tedie, pail)\nnot Astylar(theodor)\nnot Rearward(theodor)\nnot Anguish(theodor, alpa)\nGlobalise(theodor, pail)\nGlobalise(pail, theodor)\nforall x (Rearward(x) and Parisian(x) -> Anguish(x, alpa))\nforall x (Globalise(x, tedie) -> Adjustable(tedie))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> Globalise(x, tedie))\nforall x (Globalise(x, pail) -> Globalise(pail, tedie))\nforall x (Anguish(x, alpa) -> Anguish(alpa, tedie))\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Adjustable(x))\n\nAdjustable(pail)\n\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Adjustable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The jordanna abate the claudius. The damaris exert the dorolice. The claudius is not unenforced. The claudius is not incased. The claudius does not like the jordanna. The claudius hotfoot the dorolice. The dorolice hotfoot the claudius. If someone is incased and behind then they like the jordanna. If someone hotfoot the damaris then the damaris is ventricose. If someone is ventricose then they see the damaris. If someone hotfoot the dorolice then the dorolice hotfoot the damaris. If someone abate the jordanna then the jordanna abate the damaris. All behind people are ventricose. The jordanna does not like the jordanna.", "logic": "\nAbate(jordanna, claudius)\nExert(damaris, dorolice)\nnot Unenforced(claudius)\nnot Incased(claudius)\nnot Abate(claudius, jordanna)\nHotfoot(claudius, dorolice)\nHotfoot(dorolice, claudius)\nforall x (Incased(x) and Behind(x) -> Abate(x, jordanna))\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, damaris) -> Ventricose(damaris))\nforall x (Ventricose(x) -> Hotfoot(x, damaris))\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, dorolice) -> Hotfoot(dorolice, damaris))\nforall x (Abate(x, jordanna) -> Abate(jordanna, damaris))\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Ventricose(x))\n\nnot Abate(jordanna, jordanna)\n\nforall x (Incased(x) and Behind(x) -> Abate(x, jordanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The fritz perk the douggie. The hope ornament the wilona. The douggie is not aging. The douggie is not dated. The douggie does not like the fritz. The douggie scuffle the wilona. The wilona scuffle the douggie. If someone is dated and coolheaded then they like the fritz. If someone scuffle the hope then the hope is cursorial. If someone is cursorial then they see the hope. If someone scuffle the wilona then the wilona scuffle the hope. If someone perk the fritz then the fritz perk the hope. All coolheaded people are cursorial. The fritz perk the hope.", "logic": "\nPerk(fritz, douggie)\nOrnament(hope, wilona)\nnot Aging(douggie)\nnot Dated(douggie)\nnot Perk(douggie, fritz)\nScuffle(douggie, wilona)\nScuffle(wilona, douggie)\nforall x (Dated(x) and Coolheaded(x) -> Perk(x, fritz))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, hope) -> Cursorial(hope))\nforall x (Cursorial(x) -> Scuffle(x, hope))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, wilona) -> Scuffle(wilona, hope))\nforall x (Perk(x, fritz) -> Perk(fritz, hope))\nforall x (Coolheaded(x) -> Cursorial(x))\n\nPerk(fritz, hope)\n\nforall x (Perk(x, fritz) -> Perk(fritz, hope)) <- forall x (Dated(x) and Coolheaded(x) -> Perk(x, fritz)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The rolph dogmatise the loleta. The stanford articulate the louella. The loleta is not submissive. The loleta is not chaldaean. The loleta does not like the rolph. The loleta overtrump the louella. The louella overtrump the loleta. If someone is chaldaean and iraki then they like the rolph. If someone overtrump the stanford then the stanford is cumuliform. If someone is cumuliform then they see the stanford. If someone overtrump the louella then the louella overtrump the stanford. If someone dogmatise the rolph then the rolph dogmatise the stanford. All iraki people are cumuliform. The loleta does not like the stanford.", "logic": "\nDogmatise(rolph, loleta)\nArticulate(stanford, louella)\nnot Submissive(loleta)\nnot Chaldaean(loleta)\nnot Dogmatise(loleta, rolph)\nOvertrump(loleta, louella)\nOvertrump(louella, loleta)\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) and Iraki(x) -> Dogmatise(x, rolph))\nforall x (Overtrump(x, stanford) -> Cumuliform(stanford))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) -> Overtrump(x, stanford))\nforall x (Overtrump(x, louella) -> Overtrump(louella, stanford))\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, rolph) -> Dogmatise(rolph, stanford))\nforall x (Iraki(x) -> Cumuliform(x))\n\nnot Dogmatise(loleta, stanford)\n\nnot Dogmatise(loleta, stanford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The suzy candy the marta. The christal maunder the archibald. The marta is not fumbling. The marta is not zimbabwean. The marta does not like the suzy. The marta implant the archibald. The archibald implant the marta. If someone is zimbabwean and recurvate then they like the suzy. If someone implant the christal then the christal is inclined. If someone is inclined then they see the christal. If someone implant the archibald then the archibald implant the christal. If someone candy the suzy then the suzy candy the christal. All recurvate people are inclined. The archibald is blue.", "logic": "\nCandy(suzy, marta)\nMaunder(christal, archibald)\nnot Fumbling(marta)\nnot Zimbabwean(marta)\nnot Candy(marta, suzy)\nImplant(marta, archibald)\nImplant(archibald, marta)\nforall x (Zimbabwean(x) and Recurvate(x) -> Candy(x, suzy))\nforall x (Implant(x, christal) -> Inclined(christal))\nforall x (Inclined(x) -> Implant(x, christal))\nforall x (Implant(x, archibald) -> Implant(archibald, christal))\nforall x (Candy(x, suzy) -> Candy(suzy, christal))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) -> Inclined(x))\n\nBlue(archibald)\n\nBlue(archibald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The allah draggle the dwayne. The hilton shunt the janey. The dwayne is not windblown. The dwayne is not roundish. The dwayne does not like the allah. The dwayne maul the janey. The janey maul the dwayne. If someone is roundish and amebous then they like the allah. If someone maul the hilton then the hilton is imposed. If someone is imposed then they see the hilton. If someone maul the janey then the janey maul the hilton. If someone draggle the allah then the allah draggle the hilton. All amebous people are imposed. The allah is not roundish.", "logic": "\nDraggle(allah, dwayne)\nShunt(hilton, janey)\nnot Windblown(dwayne)\nnot Roundish(dwayne)\nnot Draggle(dwayne, allah)\nMaul(dwayne, janey)\nMaul(janey, dwayne)\nforall x (Roundish(x) and Amebous(x) -> Draggle(x, allah))\nforall x (Maul(x, hilton) -> Imposed(hilton))\nforall x (Imposed(x) -> Maul(x, hilton))\nforall x (Maul(x, janey) -> Maul(janey, hilton))\nforall x (Draggle(x, allah) -> Draggle(allah, hilton))\nforall x (Amebous(x) -> Imposed(x))\n\nnot Roundish(allah)\n\nnot Roundish(allah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The nancy keen the elyn. The atalanta simplify the kalvin. The elyn is not arable. The elyn is not consuming. The elyn does not like the nancy. The elyn relapse the kalvin. The kalvin relapse the elyn. If someone is consuming and untroubled then they like the nancy. If someone relapse the atalanta then the atalanta is corbelled. If someone is corbelled then they see the atalanta. If someone relapse the kalvin then the kalvin relapse the atalanta. If someone keen the nancy then the nancy keen the atalanta. All untroubled people are corbelled. The atalanta keen the atalanta.", "logic": "\nKeen(nancy, elyn)\nSimplify(atalanta, kalvin)\nnot Arable(elyn)\nnot Consuming(elyn)\nnot Keen(elyn, nancy)\nRelapse(elyn, kalvin)\nRelapse(kalvin, elyn)\nforall x (Consuming(x) and Untroubled(x) -> Keen(x, nancy))\nforall x (Relapse(x, atalanta) -> Corbelled(atalanta))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Relapse(x, atalanta))\nforall x (Relapse(x, kalvin) -> Relapse(kalvin, atalanta))\nforall x (Keen(x, nancy) -> Keen(nancy, atalanta))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Corbelled(x))\n\nKeen(atalanta, atalanta)\n\nKeen(atalanta, atalanta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The flossi is carven. The berke purchase the gavin. The gavin flocculate the flossi. If something purchase the berke then the berke flocculate the gavin. If something bedight the flossi and it flocculate the flossi then the flossi flocculate the berke. If the berke flocculate the flossi and the berke purchase the flossi then the berke bedight the gavin. If something is soggy then it flocculate the flossi. If something is populous then it bedight the berke. If something purchase the gavin then it is populous. Young things are soggy. If something flocculate the gavin then the gavin flocculate the flossi. The berke purchase the gavin.", "logic": "\nCarven(flossi)\nPurchase(berke, gavin)\nFlocculate(gavin, flossi)\nforall x (Purchase(x, berke) -> Flocculate(berke, gavin))\nforall x (Bedight(x, flossi) and Flocculate(x, flossi) -> Flocculate(flossi, berke))\nFlocculate(berke, flossi) and Purchase(berke, flossi) -> Bedight(berke, gavin)\nforall x (Soggy(x) -> Flocculate(x, flossi))\nforall x (Populous(x) -> Bedight(x, berke))\nforall x (Purchase(x, gavin) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Populous(x) -> Soggy(x))\nforall x (Flocculate(x, gavin) -> Flocculate(gavin, flossi))\n\nPurchase(berke, gavin)\n\ntherefore Purchase(berke, gavin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The sibylla is ethnical. The leigha emphasize the julissa. The julissa manhandle the sibylla. If something emphasize the leigha then the leigha manhandle the julissa. If something imprecate the sibylla and it manhandle the sibylla then the sibylla manhandle the leigha. If the leigha manhandle the sibylla and the leigha emphasize the sibylla then the leigha imprecate the julissa. If something is undated then it manhandle the sibylla. If something is lopsided then it imprecate the leigha. If something emphasize the julissa then it is lopsided. Young things are undated. If something manhandle the julissa then the julissa manhandle the sibylla. The leigha does not eat the julissa.", "logic": "\nEthnical(sibylla)\nEmphasize(leigha, julissa)\nManhandle(julissa, sibylla)\nforall x (Emphasize(x, leigha) -> Manhandle(leigha, julissa))\nforall x (Imprecate(x, sibylla) and Manhandle(x, sibylla) -> Manhandle(sibylla, leigha))\nManhandle(leigha, sibylla) and Emphasize(leigha, sibylla) -> Imprecate(leigha, julissa)\nforall x (Undated(x) -> Manhandle(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Imprecate(x, leigha))\nforall x (Emphasize(x, julissa) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Undated(x))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, julissa) -> Manhandle(julissa, sibylla))\n\nnot Emphasize(leigha, julissa)\n\ntherefore Emphasize(leigha, julissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The tybie is rushy. The lurleen frost the ashleigh. The ashleigh adulterate the tybie. If something frost the lurleen then the lurleen adulterate the ashleigh. If something brisken the tybie and it adulterate the tybie then the tybie adulterate the lurleen. If the lurleen adulterate the tybie and the lurleen frost the tybie then the lurleen brisken the ashleigh. If something is grassy then it adulterate the tybie. If something is sundried then it brisken the lurleen. If something frost the ashleigh then it is sundried. Young things are grassy. If something adulterate the ashleigh then the ashleigh adulterate the tybie. The lurleen is sundried.", "logic": "\nRushy(tybie)\nFrost(lurleen, ashleigh)\nAdulterate(ashleigh, tybie)\nforall x (Frost(x, lurleen) -> Adulterate(lurleen, ashleigh))\nforall x (Brisken(x, tybie) and Adulterate(x, tybie) -> Adulterate(tybie, lurleen))\nAdulterate(lurleen, tybie) and Frost(lurleen, tybie) -> Brisken(lurleen, ashleigh)\nforall x (Grassy(x) -> Adulterate(x, tybie))\nforall x (Sundried(x) -> Brisken(x, lurleen))\nforall x (Frost(x, ashleigh) -> Sundried(x))\nforall x (Sundried(x) -> Grassy(x))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, ashleigh) -> Adulterate(ashleigh, tybie))\n\nSundried(lurleen)\n\nFrost(lurleen, ashleigh) and forall x (Frost(x, ashleigh) -> Sundried(x)) -> therefore Sundried(lurleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The keren is pointed. The marc unite the shantee. The shantee waver the keren. If something unite the marc then the marc waver the shantee. If something deprave the keren and it waver the keren then the keren waver the marc. If the marc waver the keren and the marc unite the keren then the marc deprave the shantee. If something is crustacean then it waver the keren. If something is accoutred then it deprave the marc. If something unite the shantee then it is accoutred. Young things are crustacean. If something waver the shantee then the shantee waver the keren. The marc is not accoutred.", "logic": "\nPointed(keren)\nUnite(marc, shantee)\nWaver(shantee, keren)\nforall x (Unite(x, marc) -> Waver(marc, shantee))\nforall x (Deprave(x, keren) and Waver(x, keren) -> Waver(keren, marc))\nWaver(marc, keren) and Unite(marc, keren) -> Deprave(marc, shantee)\nforall x (Crustacean(x) -> Waver(x, keren))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) -> Deprave(x, marc))\nforall x (Unite(x, shantee) -> Accoutred(x))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Waver(x, shantee) -> Waver(shantee, keren))\n\nnot Accoutred(marc)\n\nUnite(marc, shantee) and forall x (Unite(x, shantee) -> Accoutred(x)) -> therefore Accoutred(marc)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The meghan is consultive. The jody ditch the denna. The denna permeate the meghan. If something ditch the jody then the jody permeate the denna. If something metabolize the meghan and it permeate the meghan then the meghan permeate the jody. If the jody permeate the meghan and the jody ditch the meghan then the jody metabolize the denna. If something is myelinated then it permeate the meghan. If something is burdened then it metabolize the jody. If something ditch the denna then it is burdened. Young things are myelinated. If something permeate the denna then the denna permeate the meghan. The jody is myelinated.", "logic": "\nConsultive(meghan)\nDitch(jody, denna)\nPermeate(denna, meghan)\nforall x (Ditch(x, jody) -> Permeate(jody, denna))\nforall x (Metabolize(x, meghan) and Permeate(x, meghan) -> Permeate(meghan, jody))\nPermeate(jody, meghan) and Ditch(jody, meghan) -> Metabolize(jody, denna)\nforall x (Myelinated(x) -> Permeate(x, meghan))\nforall x (Burdened(x) -> Metabolize(x, jody))\nforall x (Ditch(x, denna) -> Burdened(x))\nforall x (Burdened(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Permeate(x, denna) -> Permeate(denna, meghan))\n\nMyelinated(jody)\n\nDitch(jody, denna) and forall x (Ditch(x, denna) -> Burdened(x)) -> therefore Burdened(jody) Burdened(jody) and forall x (Burdened(x) -> Myelinated(x)) -> therefore Myelinated(jody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The katuscha is sunk. The claudius defeat the peggy. The peggy spring the katuscha. If something defeat the claudius then the claudius spring the peggy. If something incense the katuscha and it spring the katuscha then the katuscha spring the claudius. If the claudius spring the katuscha and the claudius defeat the katuscha then the claudius incense the peggy. If something is stock then it spring the katuscha. If something is bicentric then it incense the claudius. If something defeat the peggy then it is bicentric. Young things are stock. If something spring the peggy then the peggy spring the katuscha. The claudius is not stock.", "logic": "\nSunk(katuscha)\nDefeat(claudius, peggy)\nSpring(peggy, katuscha)\nforall x (Defeat(x, claudius) -> Spring(claudius, peggy))\nforall x (Incense(x, katuscha) and Spring(x, katuscha) -> Spring(katuscha, claudius))\nSpring(claudius, katuscha) and Defeat(claudius, katuscha) -> Incense(claudius, peggy)\nforall x (Stock(x) -> Spring(x, katuscha))\nforall x (Bicentric(x) -> Incense(x, claudius))\nforall x (Defeat(x, peggy) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Bicentric(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Spring(x, peggy) -> Spring(peggy, katuscha))\n\nnot Stock(claudius)\n\nDefeat(claudius, peggy) and forall x (Defeat(x, peggy) -> Bicentric(x)) -> therefore Bicentric(claudius) Bicentric(claudius) and forall x (Bicentric(x) -> Stock(x)) -> therefore Stock(claudius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The lea is ebionite. The andonis attorn the shelly. The shelly hull the lea. If something attorn the andonis then the andonis hull the shelly. If something animate the lea and it hull the lea then the lea hull the andonis. If the andonis hull the lea and the andonis attorn the lea then the andonis animate the shelly. If something is prolusory then it hull the lea. If something is reigning then it animate the andonis. If something attorn the shelly then it is reigning. Young things are prolusory. If something hull the shelly then the shelly hull the lea. The andonis hull the lea.", "logic": "\nEbionite(lea)\nAttorn(andonis, shelly)\nHull(shelly, lea)\nforall x (Attorn(x, andonis) -> Hull(andonis, shelly))\nforall x (Animate(x, lea) and Hull(x, lea) -> Hull(lea, andonis))\nHull(andonis, lea) and Attorn(andonis, lea) -> Animate(andonis, shelly)\nforall x (Prolusory(x) -> Hull(x, lea))\nforall x (Reigning(x) -> Animate(x, andonis))\nforall x (Attorn(x, shelly) -> Reigning(x))\nforall x (Reigning(x) -> Prolusory(x))\nforall x (Hull(x, shelly) -> Hull(shelly, lea))\n\nHull(andonis, lea)\n\nAttorn(andonis, shelly) and forall x (Attorn(x, shelly) -> Reigning(x)) -> therefore Reigning(andonis) Reigning(andonis) and forall x (Reigning(x) -> Prolusory(x)) -> therefore Prolusory(andonis) Prolusory(andonis) and forall x (Prolusory(x) -> Hull(x, lea)) -> therefore Hull(andonis, lea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The kamillah is soiled. The demetrius patrol the willdon. The willdon gelatinise the kamillah. If something patrol the demetrius then the demetrius gelatinise the willdon. If something crop the kamillah and it gelatinise the kamillah then the kamillah gelatinise the demetrius. If the demetrius gelatinise the kamillah and the demetrius patrol the kamillah then the demetrius crop the willdon. If something is cuplike then it gelatinise the kamillah. If something is destroyed then it crop the demetrius. If something patrol the willdon then it is destroyed. Young things are cuplike. If something gelatinise the willdon then the willdon gelatinise the kamillah. The demetrius does not chase the kamillah.", "logic": "\nSoiled(kamillah)\nPatrol(demetrius, willdon)\nGelatinise(willdon, kamillah)\nforall x (Patrol(x, demetrius) -> Gelatinise(demetrius, willdon))\nforall x (Crop(x, kamillah) and Gelatinise(x, kamillah) -> Gelatinise(kamillah, demetrius))\nGelatinise(demetrius, kamillah) and Patrol(demetrius, kamillah) -> Crop(demetrius, willdon)\nforall x (Cuplike(x) -> Gelatinise(x, kamillah))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) -> Crop(x, demetrius))\nforall x (Patrol(x, willdon) -> Destroyed(x))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nforall x (Gelatinise(x, willdon) -> Gelatinise(willdon, kamillah))\n\nnot Gelatinise(demetrius, kamillah)\n\nPatrol(demetrius, willdon) and forall x (Patrol(x, willdon) -> Destroyed(x)) -> therefore Destroyed(demetrius) Destroyed(demetrius) and forall x (Destroyed(x) -> Cuplike(x)) -> therefore Cuplike(demetrius) Cuplike(demetrius) and forall x (Cuplike(x) -> Gelatinise(x, kamillah)) -> therefore Gelatinise(demetrius, kamillah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The cordelie is pass. The esther partake the erastus. The erastus suckle the cordelie. If something partake the esther then the esther suckle the erastus. If something okay the cordelie and it suckle the cordelie then the cordelie suckle the esther. If the esther suckle the cordelie and the esther partake the cordelie then the esther okay the erastus. If something is deuced then it suckle the cordelie. If something is trihydroxy then it okay the esther. If something partake the erastus then it is trihydroxy. Young things are deuced. If something suckle the erastus then the erastus suckle the cordelie. The cordelie does not chase the cordelie.", "logic": "\nPass(cordelie)\nPartake(esther, erastus)\nSuckle(erastus, cordelie)\nforall x (Partake(x, esther) -> Suckle(esther, erastus))\nforall x (Okay(x, cordelie) and Suckle(x, cordelie) -> Suckle(cordelie, esther))\nSuckle(esther, cordelie) and Partake(esther, cordelie) -> Okay(esther, erastus)\nforall x (Deuced(x) -> Suckle(x, cordelie))\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> Okay(x, esther))\nforall x (Partake(x, erastus) -> Trihydroxy(x))\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Suckle(x, erastus) -> Suckle(erastus, cordelie))\n\nnot Suckle(cordelie, cordelie)\n\nforall x (Deuced(x) -> Suckle(x, cordelie)) <- forall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> Deuced(x)) <- forall x (Partake(x, erastus) -> Trihydroxy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The niles is tousled. The thorpe flay the sadie. The sadie rail the niles. If something flay the thorpe then the thorpe rail the sadie. If something snuffle the niles and it rail the niles then the niles rail the thorpe. If the thorpe rail the niles and the thorpe flay the niles then the thorpe snuffle the sadie. If something is vermillion then it rail the niles. If something is uncombined then it snuffle the thorpe. If something flay the sadie then it is uncombined. Young things are vermillion. If something rail the sadie then the sadie rail the niles. The sadie is vermillion.", "logic": "\nTousled(niles)\nFlay(thorpe, sadie)\nRail(sadie, niles)\nforall x (Flay(x, thorpe) -> Rail(thorpe, sadie))\nforall x (Snuffle(x, niles) and Rail(x, niles) -> Rail(niles, thorpe))\nRail(thorpe, niles) and Flay(thorpe, niles) -> Snuffle(thorpe, sadie)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Rail(x, niles))\nforall x (Uncombined(x) -> Snuffle(x, thorpe))\nforall x (Flay(x, sadie) -> Uncombined(x))\nforall x (Uncombined(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Rail(x, sadie) -> Rail(sadie, niles))\n\nVermillion(sadie)\n\nforall x (Uncombined(x) -> Vermillion(x)) <- forall x (Flay(x, sadie) -> Uncombined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The eddie is acetous. The travers obsess the rolland. The rolland privatise the eddie. If something obsess the travers then the travers privatise the rolland. If something accustom the eddie and it privatise the eddie then the eddie privatise the travers. If the travers privatise the eddie and the travers obsess the eddie then the travers accustom the rolland. If something is transitive then it privatise the eddie. If something is infrahuman then it accustom the travers. If something obsess the rolland then it is infrahuman. Young things are transitive. If something privatise the rolland then the rolland privatise the eddie. The eddie is not infrahuman.", "logic": "\nAcetous(eddie)\nObsess(travers, rolland)\nPrivatise(rolland, eddie)\nforall x (Obsess(x, travers) -> Privatise(travers, rolland))\nforall x (Accustom(x, eddie) and Privatise(x, eddie) -> Privatise(eddie, travers))\nPrivatise(travers, eddie) and Obsess(travers, eddie) -> Accustom(travers, rolland)\nforall x (Transitive(x) -> Privatise(x, eddie))\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Accustom(x, travers))\nforall x (Obsess(x, rolland) -> Infrahuman(x))\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Transitive(x))\nforall x (Privatise(x, rolland) -> Privatise(rolland, eddie))\n\nnot Infrahuman(eddie)\n\nforall x (Obsess(x, rolland) -> Infrahuman(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The desiri is evitable. The ernst curvet the teodoro. The teodoro negate the desiri. If something curvet the ernst then the ernst negate the teodoro. If something christen the desiri and it negate the desiri then the desiri negate the ernst. If the ernst negate the desiri and the ernst curvet the desiri then the ernst christen the teodoro. If something is fecal then it negate the desiri. If something is nectarous then it christen the ernst. If something curvet the teodoro then it is nectarous. Young things are fecal. If something negate the teodoro then the teodoro negate the desiri. The desiri christen the ernst.", "logic": "\nEvitable(desiri)\nCurvet(ernst, teodoro)\nNegate(teodoro, desiri)\nforall x (Curvet(x, ernst) -> Negate(ernst, teodoro))\nforall x (Christen(x, desiri) and Negate(x, desiri) -> Negate(desiri, ernst))\nNegate(ernst, desiri) and Curvet(ernst, desiri) -> Christen(ernst, teodoro)\nforall x (Fecal(x) -> Negate(x, desiri))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Christen(x, ernst))\nforall x (Curvet(x, teodoro) -> Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Fecal(x))\nforall x (Negate(x, teodoro) -> Negate(teodoro, desiri))\n\nChristen(desiri, ernst)\n\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Christen(x, ernst)) <- forall x (Curvet(x, teodoro) -> Nectarous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The vena is spumy. The rosaleen snowboard the korie. The korie divaricate the vena. If something snowboard the rosaleen then the rosaleen divaricate the korie. If something interdict the vena and it divaricate the vena then the vena divaricate the rosaleen. If the rosaleen divaricate the vena and the rosaleen snowboard the vena then the rosaleen interdict the korie. If something is wayfaring then it divaricate the vena. If something is pyemic then it interdict the rosaleen. If something snowboard the korie then it is pyemic. Young things are wayfaring. If something divaricate the korie then the korie divaricate the vena. The korie does not eat the korie.", "logic": "\nSpumy(vena)\nSnowboard(rosaleen, korie)\nDivaricate(korie, vena)\nforall x (Snowboard(x, rosaleen) -> Divaricate(rosaleen, korie))\nforall x (Interdict(x, vena) and Divaricate(x, vena) -> Divaricate(vena, rosaleen))\nDivaricate(rosaleen, vena) and Snowboard(rosaleen, vena) -> Interdict(rosaleen, korie)\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Divaricate(x, vena))\nforall x (Pyemic(x) -> Interdict(x, rosaleen))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, korie) -> Pyemic(x))\nforall x (Pyemic(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Divaricate(x, korie) -> Divaricate(korie, vena))\n\nnot Snowboard(korie, korie)\n\nnot Snowboard(korie, korie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The lefty is perverted. The remington exorcise the carlyn. The carlyn drip the lefty. If something exorcise the remington then the remington drip the carlyn. If something abdicate the lefty and it drip the lefty then the lefty drip the remington. If the remington drip the lefty and the remington exorcise the lefty then the remington abdicate the carlyn. If something is metal then it drip the lefty. If something is papuan then it abdicate the remington. If something exorcise the carlyn then it is papuan. Young things are metal. If something drip the carlyn then the carlyn drip the lefty. The lefty abdicate the carlyn.", "logic": "\nPerverted(lefty)\nExorcise(remington, carlyn)\nDrip(carlyn, lefty)\nforall x (Exorcise(x, remington) -> Drip(remington, carlyn))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, lefty) and Drip(x, lefty) -> Drip(lefty, remington))\nDrip(remington, lefty) and Exorcise(remington, lefty) -> Abdicate(remington, carlyn)\nforall x (Metal(x) -> Drip(x, lefty))\nforall x (Papuan(x) -> Abdicate(x, remington))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, carlyn) -> Papuan(x))\nforall x (Papuan(x) -> Metal(x))\nforall x (Drip(x, carlyn) -> Drip(carlyn, lefty))\n\nAbdicate(lefty, carlyn)\n\nAbdicate(lefty, carlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The neel is scented. The wilma twit the miranda. The miranda despair the neel. If something twit the wilma then the wilma despair the miranda. If something shock the neel and it despair the neel then the neel despair the wilma. If the wilma despair the neel and the wilma twit the neel then the wilma shock the miranda. If something is couth then it despair the neel. If something is shrimpy then it shock the wilma. If something twit the miranda then it is shrimpy. Young things are couth. If something despair the miranda then the miranda despair the neel. The wilma does not chase the wilma.", "logic": "\nScented(neel)\nTwit(wilma, miranda)\nDespair(miranda, neel)\nforall x (Twit(x, wilma) -> Despair(wilma, miranda))\nforall x (Shock(x, neel) and Despair(x, neel) -> Despair(neel, wilma))\nDespair(wilma, neel) and Twit(wilma, neel) -> Shock(wilma, miranda)\nforall x (Couth(x) -> Despair(x, neel))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Shock(x, wilma))\nforall x (Twit(x, miranda) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Couth(x))\nforall x (Despair(x, miranda) -> Despair(miranda, neel))\n\nnot Despair(wilma, wilma)\n\nnot Despair(wilma, wilma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The abigael is diverting. The tawsha husk the neysa. The neysa outstay the abigael. If something husk the tawsha then the tawsha outstay the neysa. If something sporulate the abigael and it outstay the abigael then the abigael outstay the tawsha. If the tawsha outstay the abigael and the tawsha husk the abigael then the tawsha sporulate the neysa. If something is nonunion then it outstay the abigael. If something is unsmooth then it sporulate the tawsha. If something husk the neysa then it is unsmooth. Young things are nonunion. If something outstay the neysa then the neysa outstay the abigael. The tawsha husk the tawsha.", "logic": "\nDiverting(abigael)\nHusk(tawsha, neysa)\nOutstay(neysa, abigael)\nforall x (Husk(x, tawsha) -> Outstay(tawsha, neysa))\nforall x (Sporulate(x, abigael) and Outstay(x, abigael) -> Outstay(abigael, tawsha))\nOutstay(tawsha, abigael) and Husk(tawsha, abigael) -> Sporulate(tawsha, neysa)\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> Outstay(x, abigael))\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Sporulate(x, tawsha))\nforall x (Husk(x, neysa) -> Unsmooth(x))\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nforall x (Outstay(x, neysa) -> Outstay(neysa, abigael))\n\nHusk(tawsha, tawsha)\n\nHusk(tawsha, tawsha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Ingaborg is transeunt. Ingaborg is not ceremonial. Ingaborg is unrhymed. Ingaborg is cinematic. Ingaborg is not vast. Valentine is mordacious. Valentine is vast. If Ingaborg is vast and Ingaborg is not mordacious then Ingaborg is leaden. All transeunt things are cinematic. Green things are not cinematic. If something is unrhymed and mordacious then it is not ceremonial. All mordacious, transeunt things are not ceremonial. If something is cinematic then it is unrhymed. If something is ceremonial then it is unrhymed. If something is vast and not cinematic then it is unrhymed. Ingaborg is unrhymed.", "logic": "\nTranseunt(ingaborg)\nnot Ceremonial(ingaborg)\nUnrhymed(ingaborg)\nCinematic(ingaborg)\nnot Vast(ingaborg)\nMordacious(valentine)\nVast(valentine)\nVast(ingaborg) and not Mordacious(ingaborg) -> Leaden(ingaborg)\nforall x (Transeunt(x) -> Cinematic(x))\nforall x (Mordacious(x) -> not Cinematic(x))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and Mordacious(x) -> not Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Mordacious(x) and Transeunt(x) -> not Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Cinematic(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) and not Cinematic(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\n\nUnrhymed(ingaborg)\n\ntherefore Unrhymed(ingaborg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Julee is tannish. Julee is not plucky. Julee is outlawed. Julee is emboldened. Julee is not broached. Fulvia is nourishing. Fulvia is broached. If Julee is broached and Julee is not nourishing then Julee is numb. All tannish things are emboldened. Green things are not emboldened. If something is outlawed and nourishing then it is not plucky. All nourishing, tannish things are not plucky. If something is emboldened then it is outlawed. If something is plucky then it is outlawed. If something is broached and not emboldened then it is outlawed. Julee is not outlawed.", "logic": "\nTannish(julee)\nnot Plucky(julee)\nOutlawed(julee)\nEmboldened(julee)\nnot Broached(julee)\nNourishing(fulvia)\nBroached(fulvia)\nBroached(julee) and not Nourishing(julee) -> Numb(julee)\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Nourishing(x) -> not Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Outlawed(x) and Nourishing(x) -> not Plucky(x))\nforall x (Nourishing(x) and Tannish(x) -> not Plucky(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) -> Outlawed(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) -> Outlawed(x))\nforall x (Broached(x) and not Emboldened(x) -> Outlawed(x))\n\nnot Outlawed(julee)\n\ntherefore Outlawed(julee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Ansel is dateable. Ansel is not vesicatory. Ansel is yellow. Ansel is cilial. Ansel is not neural. Sauncho is deadened. Sauncho is neural. If Ansel is neural and Ansel is not deadened then Ansel is muciferous. All dateable things are cilial. Green things are not cilial. If something is yellow and deadened then it is not vesicatory. All deadened, dateable things are not vesicatory. If something is cilial then it is yellow. If something is vesicatory then it is yellow. If something is neural and not cilial then it is yellow. Sauncho is not cilial.", "logic": "\nDateable(ansel)\nnot Vesicatory(ansel)\nYellow(ansel)\nCilial(ansel)\nnot Neural(ansel)\nDeadened(sauncho)\nNeural(sauncho)\nNeural(ansel) and not Deadened(ansel) -> Muciferous(ansel)\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Cilial(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) -> not Cilial(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) and Deadened(x) -> not Vesicatory(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) and Dateable(x) -> not Vesicatory(x))\nforall x (Cilial(x) -> Yellow(x))\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) -> Yellow(x))\nforall x (Neural(x) and not Cilial(x) -> Yellow(x))\n\nnot Cilial(sauncho)\n\nDeadened(sauncho) and forall x (Deadened(x) -> not Cilial(x)) -> therefore not Cilial(sauncho)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Quintin is freewill. Quintin is not translunar. Quintin is allargando. Quintin is fordable. Quintin is not germfree. Marne is perky. Marne is germfree. If Quintin is germfree and Quintin is not perky then Quintin is screwy. All freewill things are fordable. Green things are not fordable. If something is allargando and perky then it is not translunar. All perky, freewill things are not translunar. If something is fordable then it is allargando. If something is translunar then it is allargando. If something is germfree and not fordable then it is allargando. Marne is fordable.", "logic": "\nFreewill(quintin)\nnot Translunar(quintin)\nAllargando(quintin)\nFordable(quintin)\nnot Germfree(quintin)\nPerky(marne)\nGermfree(marne)\nGermfree(quintin) and not Perky(quintin) -> Screwy(quintin)\nforall x (Freewill(x) -> Fordable(x))\nforall x (Perky(x) -> not Fordable(x))\nforall x (Allargando(x) and Perky(x) -> not Translunar(x))\nforall x (Perky(x) and Freewill(x) -> not Translunar(x))\nforall x (Fordable(x) -> Allargando(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) -> Allargando(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) and not Fordable(x) -> Allargando(x))\n\nFordable(marne)\n\nPerky(marne) and forall x (Perky(x) -> not Fordable(x)) -> therefore not Fordable(marne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Katy is adsorbent. Katy is not invisible. Katy is ready. Katy is endozoan. Katy is not referent. Bobbi is autarchic. Bobbi is referent. If Katy is referent and Katy is not autarchic then Katy is mohammedan. All adsorbent things are endozoan. Green things are not endozoan. If something is ready and autarchic then it is not invisible. All autarchic, adsorbent things are not invisible. If something is endozoan then it is ready. If something is invisible then it is ready. If something is referent and not endozoan then it is ready. Bobbi is ready.", "logic": "\nAdsorbent(katy)\nnot Invisible(katy)\nReady(katy)\nEndozoan(katy)\nnot Referent(katy)\nAutarchic(bobbi)\nReferent(bobbi)\nReferent(katy) and not Autarchic(katy) -> Mohammedan(katy)\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Endozoan(x))\nforall x (Autarchic(x) -> not Endozoan(x))\nforall x (Ready(x) and Autarchic(x) -> not Invisible(x))\nforall x (Autarchic(x) and Adsorbent(x) -> not Invisible(x))\nforall x (Endozoan(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Invisible(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) and not Endozoan(x) -> Ready(x))\n\nReady(bobbi)\n\nAutarchic(bobbi) and forall x (Autarchic(x) -> not Endozoan(x)) -> therefore not Endozoan(bobbi) Referent(bobbi) and not Endozoan(bobbi) and forall x (Referent(x) and not Endozoan(x) -> Ready(x)) -> therefore Ready(bobbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Guy is greenish. Guy is not external. Guy is sciolistic. Guy is lone. Guy is not corymbose. Adrien is eastward. Adrien is corymbose. If Guy is corymbose and Guy is not eastward then Guy is elite. All greenish things are lone. Green things are not lone. If something is sciolistic and eastward then it is not external. All eastward, greenish things are not external. If something is lone then it is sciolistic. If something is external then it is sciolistic. If something is corymbose and not lone then it is sciolistic. Adrien is not sciolistic.", "logic": "\nGreenish(guy)\nnot External(guy)\nSciolistic(guy)\nLone(guy)\nnot Corymbose(guy)\nEastward(adrien)\nCorymbose(adrien)\nCorymbose(guy) and not Eastward(guy) -> Elite(guy)\nforall x (Greenish(x) -> Lone(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> not Lone(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) and Eastward(x) -> not External(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) and Greenish(x) -> not External(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (External(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (Corymbose(x) and not Lone(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\n\nnot Sciolistic(adrien)\n\nEastward(adrien) and forall x (Eastward(x) -> not Lone(x)) -> therefore not Lone(adrien) Corymbose(adrien) and not Lone(adrien) and forall x (Corymbose(x) and not Lone(x) -> Sciolistic(x)) -> therefore Sciolistic(adrien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Zack is upstream. Zack is not capitate. Zack is deductive. Zack is undersized. Zack is not serrated. Fatima is churlish. Fatima is serrated. If Zack is serrated and Zack is not churlish then Zack is massive. All upstream things are undersized. Green things are not undersized. If something is deductive and churlish then it is not capitate. All churlish, upstream things are not capitate. If something is undersized then it is deductive. If something is capitate then it is deductive. If something is serrated and not undersized then it is deductive. Fatima is not capitate.", "logic": "\nUpstream(zack)\nnot Capitate(zack)\nDeductive(zack)\nUndersized(zack)\nnot Serrated(zack)\nChurlish(fatima)\nSerrated(fatima)\nSerrated(zack) and not Churlish(zack) -> Massive(zack)\nforall x (Upstream(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> not Undersized(x))\nforall x (Deductive(x) and Churlish(x) -> not Capitate(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) and Upstream(x) -> not Capitate(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Deductive(x))\nforall x (Capitate(x) -> Deductive(x))\nforall x (Serrated(x) and not Undersized(x) -> Deductive(x))\n\nnot Capitate(fatima)\n\nChurlish(fatima) and forall x (Churlish(x) -> not Undersized(x)) -> therefore not Undersized(fatima) Serrated(fatima) and not Undersized(fatima) and forall x (Serrated(x) and not Undersized(x) -> Deductive(x)) -> therefore Deductive(fatima) Deductive(fatima) and Churlish(fatima) and forall x (Deductive(x) and Churlish(x) -> not Capitate(x)) -> therefore not Capitate(fatima)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Darci is brainy. Darci is not amatory. Darci is unpleasant. Darci is autoicous. Darci is not juvenile. Faunie is austral. Faunie is juvenile. If Darci is juvenile and Darci is not austral then Darci is insistent. All brainy things are autoicous. Green things are not autoicous. If something is unpleasant and austral then it is not amatory. All austral, brainy things are not amatory. If something is autoicous then it is unpleasant. If something is amatory then it is unpleasant. If something is juvenile and not autoicous then it is unpleasant. Faunie is amatory.", "logic": "\nBrainy(darci)\nnot Amatory(darci)\nUnpleasant(darci)\nAutoicous(darci)\nnot Juvenile(darci)\nAustral(faunie)\nJuvenile(faunie)\nJuvenile(darci) and not Austral(darci) -> Insistent(darci)\nforall x (Brainy(x) -> Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> not Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Austral(x) -> not Amatory(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) and Brainy(x) -> not Amatory(x))\nforall x (Autoicous(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) and not Autoicous(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\n\nAmatory(faunie)\n\nAustral(faunie) and forall x (Austral(x) -> not Autoicous(x)) -> therefore not Autoicous(faunie) Juvenile(faunie) and not Autoicous(faunie) and forall x (Juvenile(x) and not Autoicous(x) -> Unpleasant(x)) -> therefore Unpleasant(faunie) Unpleasant(faunie) and Austral(faunie) and forall x (Unpleasant(x) and Austral(x) -> not Amatory(x)) -> therefore not Amatory(faunie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Alpa is fruity. Alpa is not faceless. Alpa is undyed. Alpa is rapid. Alpa is not phylliform. Swen is anestrous. Swen is phylliform. If Alpa is phylliform and Alpa is not anestrous then Alpa is lavender. All fruity things are rapid. Green things are not rapid. If something is undyed and anestrous then it is not faceless. All anestrous, fruity things are not faceless. If something is rapid then it is undyed. If something is faceless then it is undyed. If something is phylliform and not rapid then it is undyed. Alpa is not lavender.", "logic": "\nFruity(alpa)\nnot Faceless(alpa)\nUndyed(alpa)\nRapid(alpa)\nnot Phylliform(alpa)\nAnestrous(swen)\nPhylliform(swen)\nPhylliform(alpa) and not Anestrous(alpa) -> Lavender(alpa)\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> Rapid(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> not Rapid(x))\nforall x (Undyed(x) and Anestrous(x) -> not Faceless(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) and Fruity(x) -> not Faceless(x))\nforall x (Rapid(x) -> Undyed(x))\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Undyed(x))\nforall x (Phylliform(x) and not Rapid(x) -> Undyed(x))\n\nnot Lavender(alpa)\n\nPhylliform(alpa) and not Anestrous(alpa) -> Lavender(alpa) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Valdemar is babelike. Valdemar is not parvenu. Valdemar is aspheric. Valdemar is deductive. Valdemar is not laborious. Yardley is teary. Yardley is laborious. If Valdemar is laborious and Valdemar is not teary then Valdemar is snide. All babelike things are deductive. Green things are not deductive. If something is aspheric and teary then it is not parvenu. All teary, babelike things are not parvenu. If something is deductive then it is aspheric. If something is parvenu then it is aspheric. If something is laborious and not deductive then it is aspheric. Valdemar is teary.", "logic": "\nBabelike(valdemar)\nnot Parvenu(valdemar)\nAspheric(valdemar)\nDeductive(valdemar)\nnot Laborious(valdemar)\nTeary(yardley)\nLaborious(yardley)\nLaborious(valdemar) and not Teary(valdemar) -> Snide(valdemar)\nforall x (Babelike(x) -> Deductive(x))\nforall x (Teary(x) -> not Deductive(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) and Teary(x) -> not Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Teary(x) and Babelike(x) -> not Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Deductive(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) and not Deductive(x) -> Aspheric(x))\n\nTeary(valdemar)\n\nTeary(valdemar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Alla is unthawed. Alla is not belittled. Alla is appeasable. Alla is peppy. Alla is not toed. Fanya is abkhazian. Fanya is toed. If Alla is toed and Alla is not abkhazian then Alla is doubled. All unthawed things are peppy. Green things are not peppy. If something is appeasable and abkhazian then it is not belittled. All abkhazian, unthawed things are not belittled. If something is peppy then it is appeasable. If something is belittled then it is appeasable. If something is toed and not peppy then it is appeasable. Fanya is not doubled.", "logic": "\nUnthawed(alla)\nnot Belittled(alla)\nAppeasable(alla)\nPeppy(alla)\nnot Toed(alla)\nAbkhazian(fanya)\nToed(fanya)\nToed(alla) and not Abkhazian(alla) -> Doubled(alla)\nforall x (Unthawed(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> not Peppy(x))\nforall x (Appeasable(x) and Abkhazian(x) -> not Belittled(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Unthawed(x) -> not Belittled(x))\nforall x (Peppy(x) -> Appeasable(x))\nforall x (Belittled(x) -> Appeasable(x))\nforall x (Toed(x) and not Peppy(x) -> Appeasable(x))\n\nnot Doubled(fanya)\n\nnot Doubled(fanya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Dedra is flameproof. Dedra is not healthful. Dedra is emergent. Dedra is permutable. Dedra is not crosswise. Aileen is blanched. Aileen is crosswise. If Dedra is crosswise and Dedra is not blanched then Dedra is autogamous. All flameproof things are permutable. Green things are not permutable. If something is emergent and blanched then it is not healthful. All blanched, flameproof things are not healthful. If something is permutable then it is emergent. If something is healthful then it is emergent. If something is crosswise and not permutable then it is emergent. Aileen is flameproof.", "logic": "\nFlameproof(dedra)\nnot Healthful(dedra)\nEmergent(dedra)\nPermutable(dedra)\nnot Crosswise(dedra)\nBlanched(aileen)\nCrosswise(aileen)\nCrosswise(dedra) and not Blanched(dedra) -> Autogamous(dedra)\nforall x (Flameproof(x) -> Permutable(x))\nforall x (Blanched(x) -> not Permutable(x))\nforall x (Emergent(x) and Blanched(x) -> not Healthful(x))\nforall x (Blanched(x) and Flameproof(x) -> not Healthful(x))\nforall x (Permutable(x) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and not Permutable(x) -> Emergent(x))\n\nFlameproof(aileen)\n\nFlameproof(aileen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Shirline is not penumbral. Shirline is soporific. Shirline is bahai. Dasya is given. Dasya is middle. Dasya is penumbral. Dasya is isothermic. Merry is soporific. Merry is isothermic. Merry is deserving. If something is isothermic and penumbral then it is soporific. Nice things are given. If something is deserving then it is middle. Cold, deserving things are middle. If something is bahai then it is middle. Furry things are deserving. If something is given and not soporific then it is deserving. If Merry is middle then Merry is bahai. Dasya is penumbral.", "logic": "\nnot Penumbral(shirline)\nSoporific(shirline)\nBahai(shirline)\nGiven(dasya)\nMiddle(dasya)\nPenumbral(dasya)\nIsothermic(dasya)\nSoporific(merry)\nIsothermic(merry)\nDeserving(merry)\nforall x (Isothermic(x) and Penumbral(x) -> Soporific(x))\nforall x (Bahai(x) -> Given(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Middle(x))\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and Deserving(x) -> Middle(x))\nforall x (Bahai(x) -> Middle(x))\nforall x (Soporific(x) -> Deserving(x))\nforall x (Given(x) and not Soporific(x) -> Deserving(x))\nMiddle(merry) -> Bahai(merry)\n\nPenumbral(dasya)\n\ntherefore Penumbral(dasya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Shelia is not abstract. Shelia is indicative. Shelia is sardonic. Gleda is seamanlike. Gleda is viatical. Gleda is abstract. Gleda is sedate. Stephanus is indicative. Stephanus is sedate. Stephanus is algoid. If something is sedate and abstract then it is indicative. Nice things are seamanlike. If something is algoid then it is viatical. Cold, algoid things are viatical. If something is sardonic then it is viatical. Furry things are algoid. If something is seamanlike and not indicative then it is algoid. If Stephanus is viatical then Stephanus is sardonic. Shelia is not indicative.", "logic": "\nnot Abstract(shelia)\nIndicative(shelia)\nSardonic(shelia)\nSeamanlike(gleda)\nViatical(gleda)\nAbstract(gleda)\nSedate(gleda)\nIndicative(stephanus)\nSedate(stephanus)\nAlgoid(stephanus)\nforall x (Sedate(x) and Abstract(x) -> Indicative(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Seamanlike(x))\nforall x (Algoid(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x) and Algoid(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Indicative(x) -> Algoid(x))\nforall x (Seamanlike(x) and not Indicative(x) -> Algoid(x))\nViatical(stephanus) -> Sardonic(stephanus)\n\nnot Indicative(shelia)\n\ntherefore Indicative(shelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Brina is not effectual. Brina is basilican. Brina is fueled. Noble is analogical. Noble is undamaged. Noble is effectual. Noble is rubbishy. Percival is basilican. Percival is rubbishy. Percival is prime. If something is rubbishy and effectual then it is basilican. Nice things are analogical. If something is prime then it is undamaged. Cold, prime things are undamaged. If something is fueled then it is undamaged. Furry things are prime. If something is analogical and not basilican then it is prime. If Percival is undamaged then Percival is fueled. Percival is undamaged.", "logic": "\nnot Effectual(brina)\nBasilican(brina)\nFueled(brina)\nAnalogical(noble)\nUndamaged(noble)\nEffectual(noble)\nRubbishy(noble)\nBasilican(percival)\nRubbishy(percival)\nPrime(percival)\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) and Effectual(x) -> Basilican(x))\nforall x (Fueled(x) -> Analogical(x))\nforall x (Prime(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nforall x (Effectual(x) and Prime(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nforall x (Fueled(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nforall x (Basilican(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Analogical(x) and not Basilican(x) -> Prime(x))\nUndamaged(percival) -> Fueled(percival)\n\nUndamaged(percival)\n\nPrime(percival) and forall x (Prime(x) -> Undamaged(x)) -> therefore Undamaged(percival)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Marley is not enolic. Marley is chaste. Marley is eupnoeic. Wolfy is frugal. Wolfy is appeasing. Wolfy is enolic. Wolfy is combatant. Cammi is chaste. Cammi is combatant. Cammi is snoopy. If something is combatant and enolic then it is chaste. Nice things are frugal. If something is snoopy then it is appeasing. Cold, snoopy things are appeasing. If something is eupnoeic then it is appeasing. Furry things are snoopy. If something is frugal and not chaste then it is snoopy. If Cammi is appeasing then Cammi is eupnoeic. Marley is not appeasing.", "logic": "\nnot Enolic(marley)\nChaste(marley)\nEupnoeic(marley)\nFrugal(wolfy)\nAppeasing(wolfy)\nEnolic(wolfy)\nCombatant(wolfy)\nChaste(cammi)\nCombatant(cammi)\nSnoopy(cammi)\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Enolic(x) -> Chaste(x))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) -> Frugal(x))\nforall x (Snoopy(x) -> Appeasing(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Snoopy(x) -> Appeasing(x))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) -> Appeasing(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nforall x (Frugal(x) and not Chaste(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nAppeasing(cammi) -> Eupnoeic(cammi)\n\nnot Appeasing(marley)\n\nEupnoeic(marley) and forall x (Eupnoeic(x) -> Appeasing(x)) -> therefore Appeasing(marley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Harlan is not suspect. Harlan is haunting. Harlan is poetic. Connie is unfilmed. Connie is deictic. Connie is suspect. Connie is hurt. Jim is haunting. Jim is hurt. Jim is senecan. If something is hurt and suspect then it is haunting. Nice things are unfilmed. If something is senecan then it is deictic. Cold, senecan things are deictic. If something is poetic then it is deictic. Furry things are senecan. If something is unfilmed and not haunting then it is senecan. If Jim is deictic then Jim is poetic. Jim is poetic.", "logic": "\nnot Suspect(harlan)\nHaunting(harlan)\nPoetic(harlan)\nUnfilmed(connie)\nDeictic(connie)\nSuspect(connie)\nHurt(connie)\nHaunting(jim)\nHurt(jim)\nSenecan(jim)\nforall x (Hurt(x) and Suspect(x) -> Haunting(x))\nforall x (Poetic(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x) and Senecan(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Poetic(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Haunting(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) and not Haunting(x) -> Senecan(x))\nDeictic(jim) -> Poetic(jim)\n\nPoetic(jim)\n\nSenecan(jim) and forall x (Senecan(x) -> Deictic(x)) -> therefore Deictic(jim) Deictic(jim) and Deictic(jim) -> Poetic(jim) -> therefore Poetic(jim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Bobina is not unprovoked. Bobina is probable. Bobina is expendable. Thaddus is hadal. Thaddus is unsexy. Thaddus is unprovoked. Thaddus is unhindered. Matteo is probable. Matteo is unhindered. Matteo is bimodal. If something is unhindered and unprovoked then it is probable. Nice things are hadal. If something is bimodal then it is unsexy. Cold, bimodal things are unsexy. If something is expendable then it is unsexy. Furry things are bimodal. If something is hadal and not probable then it is bimodal. If Matteo is unsexy then Matteo is expendable. Thaddus is not bimodal.", "logic": "\nnot Unprovoked(bobina)\nProbable(bobina)\nExpendable(bobina)\nHadal(thaddus)\nUnsexy(thaddus)\nUnprovoked(thaddus)\nUnhindered(thaddus)\nProbable(matteo)\nUnhindered(matteo)\nBimodal(matteo)\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and Unprovoked(x) -> Probable(x))\nforall x (Expendable(x) -> Hadal(x))\nforall x (Bimodal(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Unprovoked(x) and Bimodal(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Expendable(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Probable(x) -> Bimodal(x))\nforall x (Hadal(x) and not Probable(x) -> Bimodal(x))\nUnsexy(matteo) -> Expendable(matteo)\n\nnot Bimodal(thaddus)\n\nUnhindered(thaddus) and Unprovoked(thaddus) and forall x (Unhindered(x) and Unprovoked(x) -> Probable(x)) -> therefore Probable(thaddus) Probable(thaddus) and forall x (Probable(x) -> Bimodal(x)) -> therefore Bimodal(thaddus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Elwyn is not bountiful. Elwyn is voluntary. Elwyn is idealised. Amelina is sappy. Amelina is serried. Amelina is bountiful. Amelina is trinuclear. Vernor is voluntary. Vernor is trinuclear. Vernor is taoist. If something is trinuclear and bountiful then it is voluntary. Nice things are sappy. If something is taoist then it is serried. Cold, taoist things are serried. If something is idealised then it is serried. Furry things are taoist. If something is sappy and not voluntary then it is taoist. If Vernor is serried then Vernor is idealised. Vernor is sappy.", "logic": "\nnot Bountiful(elwyn)\nVoluntary(elwyn)\nIdealised(elwyn)\nSappy(amelina)\nSerried(amelina)\nBountiful(amelina)\nTrinuclear(amelina)\nVoluntary(vernor)\nTrinuclear(vernor)\nTaoist(vernor)\nforall x (Trinuclear(x) and Bountiful(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nforall x (Idealised(x) -> Sappy(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) -> Serried(x))\nforall x (Bountiful(x) and Taoist(x) -> Serried(x))\nforall x (Idealised(x) -> Serried(x))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Taoist(x))\nforall x (Sappy(x) and not Voluntary(x) -> Taoist(x))\nSerried(vernor) -> Idealised(vernor)\n\nSappy(vernor)\n\nTaoist(vernor) and forall x (Taoist(x) -> Serried(x)) -> therefore Serried(vernor) Serried(vernor) and Serried(vernor) -> Idealised(vernor) -> therefore Idealised(vernor) Idealised(vernor) and forall x (Idealised(x) -> Sappy(x)) -> therefore Sappy(vernor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Algernon is not dantean. Algernon is antiphonal. Algernon is unfueled. Linell is ambulant. Linell is leisured. Linell is dantean. Linell is spiritous. Weston is antiphonal. Weston is spiritous. Weston is ossified. If something is spiritous and dantean then it is antiphonal. Nice things are ambulant. If something is ossified then it is leisured. Cold, ossified things are leisured. If something is unfueled then it is leisured. Furry things are ossified. If something is ambulant and not antiphonal then it is ossified. If Weston is leisured then Weston is unfueled. Weston is not ambulant.", "logic": "\nnot Dantean(algernon)\nAntiphonal(algernon)\nUnfueled(algernon)\nAmbulant(linell)\nLeisured(linell)\nDantean(linell)\nSpiritous(linell)\nAntiphonal(weston)\nSpiritous(weston)\nOssified(weston)\nforall x (Spiritous(x) and Dantean(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Ambulant(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Dantean(x) and Ossified(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Antiphonal(x) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Ambulant(x) and not Antiphonal(x) -> Ossified(x))\nLeisured(weston) -> Unfueled(weston)\n\nnot Ambulant(weston)\n\nOssified(weston) and forall x (Ossified(x) -> Leisured(x)) -> therefore Leisured(weston) Leisured(weston) and Leisured(weston) -> Unfueled(weston) -> therefore Unfueled(weston) Unfueled(weston) and forall x (Unfueled(x) -> Ambulant(x)) -> therefore Ambulant(weston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Laina is not newborn. Laina is digestive. Laina is strange. Ramon is heatless. Ramon is mortifying. Ramon is newborn. Ramon is unsure. Farand is digestive. Farand is unsure. Farand is extensile. If something is unsure and newborn then it is digestive. Nice things are heatless. If something is extensile then it is mortifying. Cold, extensile things are mortifying. If something is strange then it is mortifying. Furry things are extensile. If something is heatless and not digestive then it is extensile. If Farand is mortifying then Farand is strange. Laina is not unsure.", "logic": "\nnot Newborn(laina)\nDigestive(laina)\nStrange(laina)\nHeatless(ramon)\nMortifying(ramon)\nNewborn(ramon)\nUnsure(ramon)\nDigestive(farand)\nUnsure(farand)\nExtensile(farand)\nforall x (Unsure(x) and Newborn(x) -> Digestive(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) -> Mortifying(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) and Extensile(x) -> Mortifying(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) -> Mortifying(x))\nforall x (Digestive(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Heatless(x) and not Digestive(x) -> Extensile(x))\nMortifying(farand) -> Strange(farand)\n\nnot Unsure(laina)\n\nnot Unsure(laina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Sayers is not greedy. Sayers is apsidal. Sayers is misrelated. Ripley is glaciated. Ripley is scapular. Ripley is greedy. Ripley is prostrate. Wilburn is apsidal. Wilburn is prostrate. Wilburn is disorderly. If something is prostrate and greedy then it is apsidal. Nice things are glaciated. If something is disorderly then it is scapular. Cold, disorderly things are scapular. If something is misrelated then it is scapular. Furry things are disorderly. If something is glaciated and not apsidal then it is disorderly. If Wilburn is scapular then Wilburn is misrelated. Wilburn is greedy.", "logic": "\nnot Greedy(sayers)\nApsidal(sayers)\nMisrelated(sayers)\nGlaciated(ripley)\nScapular(ripley)\nGreedy(ripley)\nProstrate(ripley)\nApsidal(wilburn)\nProstrate(wilburn)\nDisorderly(wilburn)\nforall x (Prostrate(x) and Greedy(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) -> Glaciated(x))\nforall x (Disorderly(x) -> Scapular(x))\nforall x (Greedy(x) and Disorderly(x) -> Scapular(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) -> Scapular(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) -> Disorderly(x))\nforall x (Glaciated(x) and not Apsidal(x) -> Disorderly(x))\nScapular(wilburn) -> Misrelated(wilburn)\n\nGreedy(wilburn)\n\nGreedy(wilburn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Alla is mutant. Alla is phonic. Alla is unapparent. Alla is vigilant. Alla is scaleless. Alla is motiveless. Alla is lethal. Corliss is unapparent. Corliss is scaleless. Corliss is lethal. Kind, lethal people are mutant. If Alla is mutant and Alla is vigilant then Alla is phonic. All unapparent, motiveless people are mutant. If someone is vigilant then they are motiveless. All mutant, lethal people are vigilant. If someone is scaleless then they are motiveless. Alla is scaleless.", "logic": "\nMutant(alla)\nPhonic(alla)\nUnapparent(alla)\nVigilant(alla)\nScaleless(alla)\nMotiveless(alla)\nLethal(alla)\nUnapparent(corliss)\nScaleless(corliss)\nLethal(corliss)\nforall x (Vigilant(x) and Lethal(x) -> Mutant(x))\nMutant(alla) and Vigilant(alla) -> Phonic(alla)\nforall x (Unapparent(x) and Motiveless(x) -> Mutant(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Mutant(x) and Lethal(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Scaleless(x) -> Motiveless(x))\n\nScaleless(alla)\n\ntherefore Scaleless(alla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Tresa is coronary. Tresa is xxvii. Tresa is rarified. Tresa is satisfying. Tresa is agleam. Tresa is storeyed. Tresa is precordial. Collette is rarified. Collette is agleam. Collette is precordial. Kind, precordial people are coronary. If Tresa is coronary and Tresa is satisfying then Tresa is xxvii. All rarified, storeyed people are coronary. If someone is satisfying then they are storeyed. All coronary, precordial people are satisfying. If someone is agleam then they are storeyed. Collette is not rarified.", "logic": "\nCoronary(tresa)\nXxvii(tresa)\nRarified(tresa)\nSatisfying(tresa)\nAgleam(tresa)\nStoreyed(tresa)\nPrecordial(tresa)\nRarified(collette)\nAgleam(collette)\nPrecordial(collette)\nforall x (Satisfying(x) and Precordial(x) -> Coronary(x))\nCoronary(tresa) and Satisfying(tresa) -> Xxvii(tresa)\nforall x (Rarified(x) and Storeyed(x) -> Coronary(x))\nforall x (Satisfying(x) -> Storeyed(x))\nforall x (Coronary(x) and Precordial(x) -> Satisfying(x))\nforall x (Agleam(x) -> Storeyed(x))\n\nnot Rarified(collette)\n\ntherefore Rarified(collette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Paton is enured. Paton is floury. Paton is regardant. Paton is despised. Paton is scoreless. Paton is tilled. Paton is aqueous. Ernesto is regardant. Ernesto is scoreless. Ernesto is aqueous. Kind, aqueous people are enured. If Paton is enured and Paton is despised then Paton is floury. All regardant, tilled people are enured. If someone is despised then they are tilled. All enured, aqueous people are despised. If someone is scoreless then they are tilled. Ernesto is tilled.", "logic": "\nEnured(paton)\nFloury(paton)\nRegardant(paton)\nDespised(paton)\nScoreless(paton)\nTilled(paton)\nAqueous(paton)\nRegardant(ernesto)\nScoreless(ernesto)\nAqueous(ernesto)\nforall x (Despised(x) and Aqueous(x) -> Enured(x))\nEnured(paton) and Despised(paton) -> Floury(paton)\nforall x (Regardant(x) and Tilled(x) -> Enured(x))\nforall x (Despised(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Enured(x) and Aqueous(x) -> Despised(x))\nforall x (Scoreless(x) -> Tilled(x))\n\nTilled(ernesto)\n\nScoreless(ernesto) and forall x (Scoreless(x) -> Tilled(x)) -> therefore Tilled(ernesto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Kristina is obliging. Kristina is merging. Kristina is open. Kristina is sunburned. Kristina is unplayable. Kristina is built. Kristina is sculpted. Dominica is open. Dominica is unplayable. Dominica is sculpted. Kind, sculpted people are obliging. If Kristina is obliging and Kristina is sunburned then Kristina is merging. All open, built people are obliging. If someone is sunburned then they are built. All obliging, sculpted people are sunburned. If someone is unplayable then they are built. Dominica is not built.", "logic": "\nObliging(kristina)\nMerging(kristina)\nOpen(kristina)\nSunburned(kristina)\nUnplayable(kristina)\nBuilt(kristina)\nSculpted(kristina)\nOpen(dominica)\nUnplayable(dominica)\nSculpted(dominica)\nforall x (Sunburned(x) and Sculpted(x) -> Obliging(x))\nObliging(kristina) and Sunburned(kristina) -> Merging(kristina)\nforall x (Open(x) and Built(x) -> Obliging(x))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) -> Built(x))\nforall x (Obliging(x) and Sculpted(x) -> Sunburned(x))\nforall x (Unplayable(x) -> Built(x))\n\nnot Built(dominica)\n\nUnplayable(dominica) and forall x (Unplayable(x) -> Built(x)) -> therefore Built(dominica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Zary is cordate. Zary is astounded. Zary is crustose. Zary is most. Zary is coreferent. Zary is enteric. Zary is jamaican. Valerie is crustose. Valerie is coreferent. Valerie is jamaican. Kind, jamaican people are cordate. If Zary is cordate and Zary is most then Zary is astounded. All crustose, enteric people are cordate. If someone is most then they are enteric. All cordate, jamaican people are most. If someone is coreferent then they are enteric. Valerie is cordate.", "logic": "\nCordate(zary)\nAstounded(zary)\nCrustose(zary)\nMost(zary)\nCoreferent(zary)\nEnteric(zary)\nJamaican(zary)\nCrustose(valerie)\nCoreferent(valerie)\nJamaican(valerie)\nforall x (Most(x) and Jamaican(x) -> Cordate(x))\nCordate(zary) and Most(zary) -> Astounded(zary)\nforall x (Crustose(x) and Enteric(x) -> Cordate(x))\nforall x (Most(x) -> Enteric(x))\nforall x (Cordate(x) and Jamaican(x) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Coreferent(x) -> Enteric(x))\n\nCordate(valerie)\n\nCoreferent(valerie) and forall x (Coreferent(x) -> Enteric(x)) -> therefore Enteric(valerie) Crustose(valerie) and Enteric(valerie) and forall x (Crustose(x) and Enteric(x) -> Cordate(x)) -> therefore Cordate(valerie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Adelina is starchlike. Adelina is peccant. Adelina is regenerate. Adelina is hardbound. Adelina is nitrous. Adelina is convincing. Adelina is allover. Albertine is regenerate. Albertine is nitrous. Albertine is allover. Kind, allover people are starchlike. If Adelina is starchlike and Adelina is hardbound then Adelina is peccant. All regenerate, convincing people are starchlike. If someone is hardbound then they are convincing. All starchlike, allover people are hardbound. If someone is nitrous then they are convincing. Albertine is not starchlike.", "logic": "\nStarchlike(adelina)\nPeccant(adelina)\nRegenerate(adelina)\nHardbound(adelina)\nNitrous(adelina)\nConvincing(adelina)\nAllover(adelina)\nRegenerate(albertine)\nNitrous(albertine)\nAllover(albertine)\nforall x (Hardbound(x) and Allover(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nStarchlike(adelina) and Hardbound(adelina) -> Peccant(adelina)\nforall x (Regenerate(x) and Convincing(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) -> Convincing(x))\nforall x (Starchlike(x) and Allover(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Nitrous(x) -> Convincing(x))\n\nnot Starchlike(albertine)\n\nNitrous(albertine) and forall x (Nitrous(x) -> Convincing(x)) -> therefore Convincing(albertine) Regenerate(albertine) and Convincing(albertine) and forall x (Regenerate(x) and Convincing(x) -> Starchlike(x)) -> therefore Starchlike(albertine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Trisha is slighting. Trisha is cesarian. Trisha is unstilted. Trisha is odorless. Trisha is applied. Trisha is uremic. Trisha is effaceable. Harriot is unstilted. Harriot is applied. Harriot is effaceable. Kind, effaceable people are slighting. If Trisha is slighting and Trisha is odorless then Trisha is cesarian. All unstilted, uremic people are slighting. If someone is odorless then they are uremic. All slighting, effaceable people are odorless. If someone is applied then they are uremic. Harriot is odorless.", "logic": "\nSlighting(trisha)\nCesarian(trisha)\nUnstilted(trisha)\nOdorless(trisha)\nApplied(trisha)\nUremic(trisha)\nEffaceable(trisha)\nUnstilted(harriot)\nApplied(harriot)\nEffaceable(harriot)\nforall x (Odorless(x) and Effaceable(x) -> Slighting(x))\nSlighting(trisha) and Odorless(trisha) -> Cesarian(trisha)\nforall x (Unstilted(x) and Uremic(x) -> Slighting(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Slighting(x) and Effaceable(x) -> Odorless(x))\nforall x (Applied(x) -> Uremic(x))\n\nOdorless(harriot)\n\nApplied(harriot) and forall x (Applied(x) -> Uremic(x)) -> therefore Uremic(harriot) Unstilted(harriot) and Uremic(harriot) and forall x (Unstilted(x) and Uremic(x) -> Slighting(x)) -> therefore Slighting(harriot) Slighting(harriot) and Effaceable(harriot) and forall x (Slighting(x) and Effaceable(x) -> Odorless(x)) -> therefore Odorless(harriot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Hayley is septrional. Hayley is unprepared. Hayley is outsize. Hayley is agreed. Hayley is distaff. Hayley is untamed. Hayley is arctic. Steffen is outsize. Steffen is distaff. Steffen is arctic. Kind, arctic people are septrional. If Hayley is septrional and Hayley is agreed then Hayley is unprepared. All outsize, untamed people are septrional. If someone is agreed then they are untamed. All septrional, arctic people are agreed. If someone is distaff then they are untamed. Steffen is not agreed.", "logic": "\nSeptrional(hayley)\nUnprepared(hayley)\nOutsize(hayley)\nAgreed(hayley)\nDistaff(hayley)\nUntamed(hayley)\nArctic(hayley)\nOutsize(steffen)\nDistaff(steffen)\nArctic(steffen)\nforall x (Agreed(x) and Arctic(x) -> Septrional(x))\nSeptrional(hayley) and Agreed(hayley) -> Unprepared(hayley)\nforall x (Outsize(x) and Untamed(x) -> Septrional(x))\nforall x (Agreed(x) -> Untamed(x))\nforall x (Septrional(x) and Arctic(x) -> Agreed(x))\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Untamed(x))\n\nnot Agreed(steffen)\n\nDistaff(steffen) and forall x (Distaff(x) -> Untamed(x)) -> therefore Untamed(steffen) Outsize(steffen) and Untamed(steffen) and forall x (Outsize(x) and Untamed(x) -> Septrional(x)) -> therefore Septrional(steffen) Septrional(steffen) and Arctic(steffen) and forall x (Septrional(x) and Arctic(x) -> Agreed(x)) -> therefore Agreed(steffen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Stefan is utopian. Stefan is muscular. Stefan is latin. Stefan is technical. Stefan is unlogical. Yancy is latin. Yancy is technical. Yancy is unlogical. Yancy is transitive. Robbie is muscular. Robbie is unlogical. Robbie is transitive. If someone is latin and muscular then they are utopian. All utopian, splitting people are unlogical. All muscular, splitting people are latin. If someone is transitive and technical then they are splitting. If Stefan is muscular and Stefan is splitting then Stefan is latin. If Robbie is utopian then Robbie is latin. If Robbie is transitive and Robbie is muscular then Robbie is utopian. If someone is utopian and latin then they are technical. Robbie is unlogical.", "logic": "\nUtopian(stefan)\nMuscular(stefan)\nLatin(stefan)\nTechnical(stefan)\nUnlogical(stefan)\nLatin(yancy)\nTechnical(yancy)\nUnlogical(yancy)\nTransitive(yancy)\nMuscular(robbie)\nUnlogical(robbie)\nTransitive(robbie)\nforall x (Latin(x) and Muscular(x) -> Utopian(x))\nforall x (Utopian(x) and Splitting(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Muscular(x) and Splitting(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Transitive(x) and Technical(x) -> Splitting(x))\nMuscular(stefan) and Splitting(stefan) -> Latin(stefan)\nUtopian(robbie) -> Latin(robbie)\nTransitive(robbie) and Muscular(robbie) -> Utopian(robbie)\nforall x (Utopian(x) and Latin(x) -> Technical(x))\n\nUnlogical(robbie)\n\ntherefore Unlogical(robbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Maris is psychotic. Maris is fiftieth. Maris is ensuant. Maris is insolvent. Maris is unexcused. Faun is ensuant. Faun is insolvent. Faun is unexcused. Faun is goaded. Harald is fiftieth. Harald is unexcused. Harald is goaded. If someone is ensuant and fiftieth then they are psychotic. All psychotic, canary people are unexcused. All fiftieth, canary people are ensuant. If someone is goaded and insolvent then they are canary. If Maris is fiftieth and Maris is canary then Maris is ensuant. If Harald is psychotic then Harald is ensuant. If Harald is goaded and Harald is fiftieth then Harald is psychotic. If someone is psychotic and ensuant then they are insolvent. Maris is not psychotic.", "logic": "\nPsychotic(maris)\nFiftieth(maris)\nEnsuant(maris)\nInsolvent(maris)\nUnexcused(maris)\nEnsuant(faun)\nInsolvent(faun)\nUnexcused(faun)\nGoaded(faun)\nFiftieth(harald)\nUnexcused(harald)\nGoaded(harald)\nforall x (Ensuant(x) and Fiftieth(x) -> Psychotic(x))\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and Canary(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) and Canary(x) -> Ensuant(x))\nforall x (Goaded(x) and Insolvent(x) -> Canary(x))\nFiftieth(maris) and Canary(maris) -> Ensuant(maris)\nPsychotic(harald) -> Ensuant(harald)\nGoaded(harald) and Fiftieth(harald) -> Psychotic(harald)\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and Ensuant(x) -> Insolvent(x))\n\nnot Psychotic(maris)\n\ntherefore Psychotic(maris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Talia is nonuple. Talia is temperate. Talia is assentient. Talia is freewill. Talia is consoling. Adlai is assentient. Adlai is freewill. Adlai is consoling. Adlai is entitled. Bartolemo is temperate. Bartolemo is consoling. Bartolemo is entitled. If someone is assentient and temperate then they are nonuple. All nonuple, effortless people are consoling. All temperate, effortless people are assentient. If someone is entitled and freewill then they are effortless. If Talia is temperate and Talia is effortless then Talia is assentient. If Bartolemo is nonuple then Bartolemo is assentient. If Bartolemo is entitled and Bartolemo is temperate then Bartolemo is nonuple. If someone is nonuple and assentient then they are freewill. Bartolemo is nonuple.", "logic": "\nNonuple(talia)\nTemperate(talia)\nAssentient(talia)\nFreewill(talia)\nConsoling(talia)\nAssentient(adlai)\nFreewill(adlai)\nConsoling(adlai)\nEntitled(adlai)\nTemperate(bartolemo)\nConsoling(bartolemo)\nEntitled(bartolemo)\nforall x (Assentient(x) and Temperate(x) -> Nonuple(x))\nforall x (Nonuple(x) and Effortless(x) -> Consoling(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) and Effortless(x) -> Assentient(x))\nforall x (Entitled(x) and Freewill(x) -> Effortless(x))\nTemperate(talia) and Effortless(talia) -> Assentient(talia)\nNonuple(bartolemo) -> Assentient(bartolemo)\nEntitled(bartolemo) and Temperate(bartolemo) -> Nonuple(bartolemo)\nforall x (Nonuple(x) and Assentient(x) -> Freewill(x))\n\nNonuple(bartolemo)\n\nEntitled(bartolemo) and Temperate(bartolemo) and Entitled(bartolemo) and Temperate(bartolemo) -> Nonuple(bartolemo) -> therefore Nonuple(bartolemo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Agnella is dinky. Agnella is mazed. Agnella is ramshackle. Agnella is overturned. Agnella is applied. Earle is ramshackle. Earle is overturned. Earle is applied. Earle is hemic. Gere is mazed. Gere is applied. Gere is hemic. If someone is ramshackle and mazed then they are dinky. All dinky, damnable people are applied. All mazed, damnable people are ramshackle. If someone is hemic and overturned then they are damnable. If Agnella is mazed and Agnella is damnable then Agnella is ramshackle. If Gere is dinky then Gere is ramshackle. If Gere is hemic and Gere is mazed then Gere is dinky. If someone is dinky and ramshackle then they are overturned. Earle is not damnable.", "logic": "\nDinky(agnella)\nMazed(agnella)\nRamshackle(agnella)\nOverturned(agnella)\nApplied(agnella)\nRamshackle(earle)\nOverturned(earle)\nApplied(earle)\nHemic(earle)\nMazed(gere)\nApplied(gere)\nHemic(gere)\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) and Mazed(x) -> Dinky(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) and Damnable(x) -> Applied(x))\nforall x (Mazed(x) and Damnable(x) -> Ramshackle(x))\nforall x (Hemic(x) and Overturned(x) -> Damnable(x))\nMazed(agnella) and Damnable(agnella) -> Ramshackle(agnella)\nDinky(gere) -> Ramshackle(gere)\nHemic(gere) and Mazed(gere) -> Dinky(gere)\nforall x (Dinky(x) and Ramshackle(x) -> Overturned(x))\n\nnot Damnable(earle)\n\nHemic(earle) and Overturned(earle) and forall x (Hemic(x) and Overturned(x) -> Damnable(x)) -> therefore Damnable(earle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Desiree is french. Desiree is diagonal. Desiree is cubelike. Desiree is mitral. Desiree is serbian. Benedikta is cubelike. Benedikta is mitral. Benedikta is serbian. Benedikta is sigmoid. Roshelle is diagonal. Roshelle is serbian. Roshelle is sigmoid. If someone is cubelike and diagonal then they are french. All french, awned people are serbian. All diagonal, awned people are cubelike. If someone is sigmoid and mitral then they are awned. If Desiree is diagonal and Desiree is awned then Desiree is cubelike. If Roshelle is french then Roshelle is cubelike. If Roshelle is sigmoid and Roshelle is diagonal then Roshelle is french. If someone is french and cubelike then they are mitral. Roshelle is cubelike.", "logic": "\nFrench(desiree)\nDiagonal(desiree)\nCubelike(desiree)\nMitral(desiree)\nSerbian(desiree)\nCubelike(benedikta)\nMitral(benedikta)\nSerbian(benedikta)\nSigmoid(benedikta)\nDiagonal(roshelle)\nSerbian(roshelle)\nSigmoid(roshelle)\nforall x (Cubelike(x) and Diagonal(x) -> French(x))\nforall x (French(x) and Awned(x) -> Serbian(x))\nforall x (Diagonal(x) and Awned(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) and Mitral(x) -> Awned(x))\nDiagonal(desiree) and Awned(desiree) -> Cubelike(desiree)\nFrench(roshelle) -> Cubelike(roshelle)\nSigmoid(roshelle) and Diagonal(roshelle) -> French(roshelle)\nforall x (French(x) and Cubelike(x) -> Mitral(x))\n\nCubelike(roshelle)\n\nSigmoid(roshelle) and Diagonal(roshelle) and Sigmoid(roshelle) and Diagonal(roshelle) -> French(roshelle) -> therefore French(roshelle) French(roshelle) and French(roshelle) -> Cubelike(roshelle) -> therefore Cubelike(roshelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Henrik is unpowered. Henrik is upstanding. Henrik is eolotropic. Henrik is bosky. Henrik is inured. Lorrie is eolotropic. Lorrie is bosky. Lorrie is inured. Lorrie is levantine. Auberta is upstanding. Auberta is inured. Auberta is levantine. If someone is eolotropic and upstanding then they are unpowered. All unpowered, seminude people are inured. All upstanding, seminude people are eolotropic. If someone is levantine and bosky then they are seminude. If Henrik is upstanding and Henrik is seminude then Henrik is eolotropic. If Auberta is unpowered then Auberta is eolotropic. If Auberta is levantine and Auberta is upstanding then Auberta is unpowered. If someone is unpowered and eolotropic then they are bosky. Auberta is not eolotropic.", "logic": "\nUnpowered(henrik)\nUpstanding(henrik)\nEolotropic(henrik)\nBosky(henrik)\nInured(henrik)\nEolotropic(lorrie)\nBosky(lorrie)\nInured(lorrie)\nLevantine(lorrie)\nUpstanding(auberta)\nInured(auberta)\nLevantine(auberta)\nforall x (Eolotropic(x) and Upstanding(x) -> Unpowered(x))\nforall x (Unpowered(x) and Seminude(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Upstanding(x) and Seminude(x) -> Eolotropic(x))\nforall x (Levantine(x) and Bosky(x) -> Seminude(x))\nUpstanding(henrik) and Seminude(henrik) -> Eolotropic(henrik)\nUnpowered(auberta) -> Eolotropic(auberta)\nLevantine(auberta) and Upstanding(auberta) -> Unpowered(auberta)\nforall x (Unpowered(x) and Eolotropic(x) -> Bosky(x))\n\nnot Eolotropic(auberta)\n\nLevantine(auberta) and Upstanding(auberta) and Levantine(auberta) and Upstanding(auberta) -> Unpowered(auberta) -> therefore Unpowered(auberta) Unpowered(auberta) and Unpowered(auberta) -> Eolotropic(auberta) -> therefore Eolotropic(auberta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Jeremy is alpine. Jeremy is verbose. Jeremy is mendelian. Jeremy is mesmerised. Jeremy is ilxx. Rollo is mendelian. Rollo is mesmerised. Rollo is ilxx. Rollo is decussate. Carena is verbose. Carena is ilxx. Carena is decussate. If someone is mendelian and verbose then they are alpine. All alpine, torpid people are ilxx. All verbose, torpid people are mendelian. If someone is decussate and mesmerised then they are torpid. If Jeremy is verbose and Jeremy is torpid then Jeremy is mendelian. If Carena is alpine then Carena is mendelian. If Carena is decussate and Carena is verbose then Carena is alpine. If someone is alpine and mendelian then they are mesmerised. Carena is mesmerised.", "logic": "\nAlpine(jeremy)\nVerbose(jeremy)\nMendelian(jeremy)\nMesmerised(jeremy)\nIlxx(jeremy)\nMendelian(rollo)\nMesmerised(rollo)\nIlxx(rollo)\nDecussate(rollo)\nVerbose(carena)\nIlxx(carena)\nDecussate(carena)\nforall x (Mendelian(x) and Verbose(x) -> Alpine(x))\nforall x (Alpine(x) and Torpid(x) -> Ilxx(x))\nforall x (Verbose(x) and Torpid(x) -> Mendelian(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) and Mesmerised(x) -> Torpid(x))\nVerbose(jeremy) and Torpid(jeremy) -> Mendelian(jeremy)\nAlpine(carena) -> Mendelian(carena)\nDecussate(carena) and Verbose(carena) -> Alpine(carena)\nforall x (Alpine(x) and Mendelian(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\n\nMesmerised(carena)\n\nDecussate(carena) and Verbose(carena) and Decussate(carena) and Verbose(carena) -> Alpine(carena) -> therefore Alpine(carena) Decussate(carena) and Verbose(carena) and Decussate(carena) and Verbose(carena) -> Alpine(carena) -> therefore Alpine(carena) Alpine(carena) and Alpine(carena) -> Mendelian(carena) -> therefore Mendelian(carena) Alpine(carena) and Mendelian(carena) and forall x (Alpine(x) and Mendelian(x) -> Mesmerised(x)) -> therefore Mesmerised(carena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Giorgi is metacarpal. Giorgi is exodontic. Giorgi is lonesome. Giorgi is beardless. Giorgi is uncial. Moll is lonesome. Moll is beardless. Moll is uncial. Moll is avifaunal. Hollie is exodontic. Hollie is uncial. Hollie is avifaunal. If someone is lonesome and exodontic then they are metacarpal. All metacarpal, concealing people are uncial. All exodontic, concealing people are lonesome. If someone is avifaunal and beardless then they are concealing. If Giorgi is exodontic and Giorgi is concealing then Giorgi is lonesome. If Hollie is metacarpal then Hollie is lonesome. If Hollie is avifaunal and Hollie is exodontic then Hollie is metacarpal. If someone is metacarpal and lonesome then they are beardless. Hollie is not beardless.", "logic": "\nMetacarpal(giorgi)\nExodontic(giorgi)\nLonesome(giorgi)\nBeardless(giorgi)\nUncial(giorgi)\nLonesome(moll)\nBeardless(moll)\nUncial(moll)\nAvifaunal(moll)\nExodontic(hollie)\nUncial(hollie)\nAvifaunal(hollie)\nforall x (Lonesome(x) and Exodontic(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) and Concealing(x) -> Uncial(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) and Concealing(x) -> Lonesome(x))\nforall x (Avifaunal(x) and Beardless(x) -> Concealing(x))\nExodontic(giorgi) and Concealing(giorgi) -> Lonesome(giorgi)\nMetacarpal(hollie) -> Lonesome(hollie)\nAvifaunal(hollie) and Exodontic(hollie) -> Metacarpal(hollie)\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) and Lonesome(x) -> Beardless(x))\n\nnot Beardless(hollie)\n\nAvifaunal(hollie) and Exodontic(hollie) and Avifaunal(hollie) and Exodontic(hollie) -> Metacarpal(hollie) -> therefore Metacarpal(hollie) Avifaunal(hollie) and Exodontic(hollie) and Avifaunal(hollie) and Exodontic(hollie) -> Metacarpal(hollie) -> therefore Metacarpal(hollie) Metacarpal(hollie) and Metacarpal(hollie) -> Lonesome(hollie) -> therefore Lonesome(hollie) Metacarpal(hollie) and Lonesome(hollie) and forall x (Metacarpal(x) and Lonesome(x) -> Beardless(x)) -> therefore Beardless(hollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Parsifal is doleful. Parsifal is planetary. Parsifal is menacing. Parsifal is universal. Parsifal is atrial. Murdock is menacing. Murdock is universal. Murdock is atrial. Murdock is fizzing. Albrecht is planetary. Albrecht is atrial. Albrecht is fizzing. If someone is menacing and planetary then they are doleful. All doleful, liturgical people are atrial. All planetary, liturgical people are menacing. If someone is fizzing and universal then they are liturgical. If Parsifal is planetary and Parsifal is liturgical then Parsifal is menacing. If Albrecht is doleful then Albrecht is menacing. If Albrecht is fizzing and Albrecht is planetary then Albrecht is doleful. If someone is doleful and menacing then they are universal. Parsifal is not liturgical.", "logic": "\nDoleful(parsifal)\nPlanetary(parsifal)\nMenacing(parsifal)\nUniversal(parsifal)\nAtrial(parsifal)\nMenacing(murdock)\nUniversal(murdock)\nAtrial(murdock)\nFizzing(murdock)\nPlanetary(albrecht)\nAtrial(albrecht)\nFizzing(albrecht)\nforall x (Menacing(x) and Planetary(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) and Liturgical(x) -> Atrial(x))\nforall x (Planetary(x) and Liturgical(x) -> Menacing(x))\nforall x (Fizzing(x) and Universal(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nPlanetary(parsifal) and Liturgical(parsifal) -> Menacing(parsifal)\nDoleful(albrecht) -> Menacing(albrecht)\nFizzing(albrecht) and Planetary(albrecht) -> Doleful(albrecht)\nforall x (Doleful(x) and Menacing(x) -> Universal(x))\n\nnot Liturgical(parsifal)\n\nforall x (Fizzing(x) and Universal(x) -> Liturgical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Jillayne is inflamed. Jillayne is unbending. Jillayne is intramural. Jillayne is bungled. Jillayne is humanistic. Kalvin is intramural. Kalvin is bungled. Kalvin is humanistic. Kalvin is treble. Chicky is unbending. Chicky is humanistic. Chicky is treble. If someone is intramural and unbending then they are inflamed. All inflamed, afraid people are humanistic. All unbending, afraid people are intramural. If someone is treble and bungled then they are afraid. If Jillayne is unbending and Jillayne is afraid then Jillayne is intramural. If Chicky is inflamed then Chicky is intramural. If Chicky is treble and Chicky is unbending then Chicky is inflamed. If someone is inflamed and intramural then they are bungled. Kalvin is inflamed.", "logic": "\nInflamed(jillayne)\nUnbending(jillayne)\nIntramural(jillayne)\nBungled(jillayne)\nHumanistic(jillayne)\nIntramural(kalvin)\nBungled(kalvin)\nHumanistic(kalvin)\nTreble(kalvin)\nUnbending(chicky)\nHumanistic(chicky)\nTreble(chicky)\nforall x (Intramural(x) and Unbending(x) -> Inflamed(x))\nforall x (Inflamed(x) and Afraid(x) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Unbending(x) and Afraid(x) -> Intramural(x))\nforall x (Treble(x) and Bungled(x) -> Afraid(x))\nUnbending(jillayne) and Afraid(jillayne) -> Intramural(jillayne)\nInflamed(chicky) -> Intramural(chicky)\nTreble(chicky) and Unbending(chicky) -> Inflamed(chicky)\nforall x (Inflamed(x) and Intramural(x) -> Bungled(x))\n\nInflamed(kalvin)\n\nforall x (Intramural(x) and Unbending(x) -> Inflamed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Vita is conductive. Vita is tumultuous. Vita is splanchnic. Vita is extendible. Vita is tenderized. Angie is splanchnic. Angie is extendible. Angie is tenderized. Angie is cloisonne. Bealle is tumultuous. Bealle is tenderized. Bealle is cloisonne. If someone is splanchnic and tumultuous then they are conductive. All conductive, chiliastic people are tenderized. All tumultuous, chiliastic people are splanchnic. If someone is cloisonne and extendible then they are chiliastic. If Vita is tumultuous and Vita is chiliastic then Vita is splanchnic. If Bealle is conductive then Bealle is splanchnic. If Bealle is cloisonne and Bealle is tumultuous then Bealle is conductive. If someone is conductive and splanchnic then they are extendible. Vita is not cloisonne.", "logic": "\nConductive(vita)\nTumultuous(vita)\nSplanchnic(vita)\nExtendible(vita)\nTenderized(vita)\nSplanchnic(angie)\nExtendible(angie)\nTenderized(angie)\nCloisonne(angie)\nTumultuous(bealle)\nTenderized(bealle)\nCloisonne(bealle)\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and Tumultuous(x) -> Conductive(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Tenderized(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Splanchnic(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) and Extendible(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\nTumultuous(vita) and Chiliastic(vita) -> Splanchnic(vita)\nConductive(bealle) -> Splanchnic(bealle)\nCloisonne(bealle) and Tumultuous(bealle) -> Conductive(bealle)\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Splanchnic(x) -> Extendible(x))\n\nnot Cloisonne(vita)\n\nnot Cloisonne(vita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Ashlee is adjective. Ashlee is muzzy. Ashlee is triplex. Ashlee is monied. Ashlee is aboriginal. Rodie is triplex. Rodie is monied. Rodie is aboriginal. Rodie is autonomous. Billi is muzzy. Billi is aboriginal. Billi is autonomous. If someone is triplex and muzzy then they are adjective. All adjective, unchewable people are aboriginal. All muzzy, unchewable people are triplex. If someone is autonomous and monied then they are unchewable. If Ashlee is muzzy and Ashlee is unchewable then Ashlee is triplex. If Billi is adjective then Billi is triplex. If Billi is autonomous and Billi is muzzy then Billi is adjective. If someone is adjective and triplex then they are monied. Rodie is muzzy.", "logic": "\nAdjective(ashlee)\nMuzzy(ashlee)\nTriplex(ashlee)\nMonied(ashlee)\nAboriginal(ashlee)\nTriplex(rodie)\nMonied(rodie)\nAboriginal(rodie)\nAutonomous(rodie)\nMuzzy(billi)\nAboriginal(billi)\nAutonomous(billi)\nforall x (Triplex(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Adjective(x))\nforall x (Adjective(x) and Unchewable(x) -> Aboriginal(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) and Unchewable(x) -> Triplex(x))\nforall x (Autonomous(x) and Monied(x) -> Unchewable(x))\nMuzzy(ashlee) and Unchewable(ashlee) -> Triplex(ashlee)\nAdjective(billi) -> Triplex(billi)\nAutonomous(billi) and Muzzy(billi) -> Adjective(billi)\nforall x (Adjective(x) and Triplex(x) -> Monied(x))\n\nMuzzy(rodie)\n\nMuzzy(rodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The charita is vulturine. The tera thermostat the charita. If something oversupply the charita then it is unpledged. If the charita oversupply the tera and the charita is newsless then the tera flourish the charita. If something flourish the tera and it is shimmery then the tera oversupply the charita. If something oversupply the tera then it thermostat the charita. If the tera thermostat the charita then the charita flourish the tera. If something oversupply the tera and the tera thermostat the charita then the tera is shimmery. If the tera is vulturine and the tera is newsless then the tera oversupply the charita. If the charita flourish the tera then the charita oversupply the tera. The tera thermostat the charita.", "logic": "\nVulturine(charita)\nThermostat(tera, charita)\nforall x (Oversupply(x, charita) -> Unpledged(x))\nOversupply(charita, tera) and Newsless(charita) -> Flourish(tera, charita)\nforall x (Flourish(x, tera) and Shimmery(x) -> Oversupply(tera, charita))\nforall x (Oversupply(x, tera) -> Thermostat(x, charita))\nThermostat(tera, charita) -> Flourish(charita, tera)\nforall x (Oversupply(x, tera) and Thermostat(tera, charita) -> Shimmery(tera))\nVulturine(tera) and Newsless(tera) -> Oversupply(tera, charita)\nFlourish(charita, tera) -> Oversupply(charita, tera)\n\nThermostat(tera, charita)\n\ntherefore Thermostat(tera, charita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The annetta is kinky. The cecelia panhandle the annetta. If something relace the annetta then it is lexical. If the annetta relace the cecelia and the annetta is quaint then the cecelia pommel the annetta. If something pommel the cecelia and it is unsaid then the cecelia relace the annetta. If something relace the cecelia then it panhandle the annetta. If the cecelia panhandle the annetta then the annetta pommel the cecelia. If something relace the cecelia and the cecelia panhandle the annetta then the cecelia is unsaid. If the cecelia is kinky and the cecelia is quaint then the cecelia relace the annetta. If the annetta pommel the cecelia then the annetta relace the cecelia. The cecelia does not like the annetta.", "logic": "\nKinky(annetta)\nPanhandle(cecelia, annetta)\nforall x (Relace(x, annetta) -> Lexical(x))\nRelace(annetta, cecelia) and Quaint(annetta) -> Pommel(cecelia, annetta)\nforall x (Pommel(x, cecelia) and Unsaid(x) -> Relace(cecelia, annetta))\nforall x (Relace(x, cecelia) -> Panhandle(x, annetta))\nPanhandle(cecelia, annetta) -> Pommel(annetta, cecelia)\nforall x (Relace(x, cecelia) and Panhandle(cecelia, annetta) -> Unsaid(cecelia))\nKinky(cecelia) and Quaint(cecelia) -> Relace(cecelia, annetta)\nPommel(annetta, cecelia) -> Relace(annetta, cecelia)\n\nnot Panhandle(cecelia, annetta)\n\ntherefore Panhandle(cecelia, annetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The dulcinea is botulinal. The trudey overdrive the dulcinea. If something hybridise the dulcinea then it is peltate. If the dulcinea hybridise the trudey and the dulcinea is winking then the trudey stint the dulcinea. If something stint the trudey and it is acidulent then the trudey hybridise the dulcinea. If something hybridise the trudey then it overdrive the dulcinea. If the trudey overdrive the dulcinea then the dulcinea stint the trudey. If something hybridise the trudey and the trudey overdrive the dulcinea then the trudey is acidulent. If the trudey is botulinal and the trudey is winking then the trudey hybridise the dulcinea. If the dulcinea stint the trudey then the dulcinea hybridise the trudey. The dulcinea stint the trudey.", "logic": "\nBotulinal(dulcinea)\nOverdrive(trudey, dulcinea)\nforall x (Hybridise(x, dulcinea) -> Peltate(x))\nHybridise(dulcinea, trudey) and Winking(dulcinea) -> Stint(trudey, dulcinea)\nforall x (Stint(x, trudey) and Acidulent(x) -> Hybridise(trudey, dulcinea))\nforall x (Hybridise(x, trudey) -> Overdrive(x, dulcinea))\nOverdrive(trudey, dulcinea) -> Stint(dulcinea, trudey)\nforall x (Hybridise(x, trudey) and Overdrive(trudey, dulcinea) -> Acidulent(trudey))\nBotulinal(trudey) and Winking(trudey) -> Hybridise(trudey, dulcinea)\nStint(dulcinea, trudey) -> Hybridise(dulcinea, trudey)\n\nStint(dulcinea, trudey)\n\nOverdrive(trudey, dulcinea) and Overdrive(trudey, dulcinea) -> Stint(dulcinea, trudey) -> therefore Stint(dulcinea, trudey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The martha is excitable. The diego metricise the martha. If something maul the martha then it is reformable. If the martha maul the diego and the martha is historied then the diego crenel the martha. If something crenel the diego and it is polygynous then the diego maul the martha. If something maul the diego then it metricise the martha. If the diego metricise the martha then the martha crenel the diego. If something maul the diego and the diego metricise the martha then the diego is polygynous. If the diego is excitable and the diego is historied then the diego maul the martha. If the martha crenel the diego then the martha maul the diego. The martha does not see the diego.", "logic": "\nExcitable(martha)\nMetricise(diego, martha)\nforall x (Maul(x, martha) -> Reformable(x))\nMaul(martha, diego) and Historied(martha) -> Crenel(diego, martha)\nforall x (Crenel(x, diego) and Polygynous(x) -> Maul(diego, martha))\nforall x (Maul(x, diego) -> Metricise(x, martha))\nMetricise(diego, martha) -> Crenel(martha, diego)\nforall x (Maul(x, diego) and Metricise(diego, martha) -> Polygynous(diego))\nExcitable(diego) and Historied(diego) -> Maul(diego, martha)\nCrenel(martha, diego) -> Maul(martha, diego)\n\nnot Crenel(martha, diego)\n\nMetricise(diego, martha) and Metricise(diego, martha) -> Crenel(martha, diego) -> therefore Crenel(martha, diego)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The agustin is recessed. The linell hook the agustin. If something preheat the agustin then it is germfree. If the agustin preheat the linell and the agustin is dorsal then the linell homologize the agustin. If something homologize the linell and it is humiliated then the linell preheat the agustin. If something preheat the linell then it hook the agustin. If the linell hook the agustin then the agustin homologize the linell. If something preheat the linell and the linell hook the agustin then the linell is humiliated. If the linell is recessed and the linell is dorsal then the linell preheat the agustin. If the agustin homologize the linell then the agustin preheat the linell. The agustin preheat the linell.", "logic": "\nRecessed(agustin)\nHook(linell, agustin)\nforall x (Preheat(x, agustin) -> Germfree(x))\nPreheat(agustin, linell) and Dorsal(agustin) -> Homologize(linell, agustin)\nforall x (Homologize(x, linell) and Humiliated(x) -> Preheat(linell, agustin))\nforall x (Preheat(x, linell) -> Hook(x, agustin))\nHook(linell, agustin) -> Homologize(agustin, linell)\nforall x (Preheat(x, linell) and Hook(linell, agustin) -> Humiliated(linell))\nRecessed(linell) and Dorsal(linell) -> Preheat(linell, agustin)\nHomologize(agustin, linell) -> Preheat(agustin, linell)\n\nPreheat(agustin, linell)\n\nHook(linell, agustin) and Hook(linell, agustin) -> Homologize(agustin, linell) -> therefore Homologize(agustin, linell) Homologize(agustin, linell) and Homologize(agustin, linell) -> Preheat(agustin, linell) -> therefore Preheat(agustin, linell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The ellene is respected. The alvira gibber the ellene. If something bogey the ellene then it is salving. If the ellene bogey the alvira and the ellene is stalemated then the alvira outrival the ellene. If something outrival the alvira and it is dusty then the alvira bogey the ellene. If something bogey the alvira then it gibber the ellene. If the alvira gibber the ellene then the ellene outrival the alvira. If something bogey the alvira and the alvira gibber the ellene then the alvira is dusty. If the alvira is respected and the alvira is stalemated then the alvira bogey the ellene. If the ellene outrival the alvira then the ellene bogey the alvira. The ellene does not chase the alvira.", "logic": "\nRespected(ellene)\nGibber(alvira, ellene)\nforall x (Bogey(x, ellene) -> Salving(x))\nBogey(ellene, alvira) and Stalemated(ellene) -> Outrival(alvira, ellene)\nforall x (Outrival(x, alvira) and Dusty(x) -> Bogey(alvira, ellene))\nforall x (Bogey(x, alvira) -> Gibber(x, ellene))\nGibber(alvira, ellene) -> Outrival(ellene, alvira)\nforall x (Bogey(x, alvira) and Gibber(alvira, ellene) -> Dusty(alvira))\nRespected(alvira) and Stalemated(alvira) -> Bogey(alvira, ellene)\nOutrival(ellene, alvira) -> Bogey(ellene, alvira)\n\nnot Bogey(ellene, alvira)\n\nGibber(alvira, ellene) and Gibber(alvira, ellene) -> Outrival(ellene, alvira) -> therefore Outrival(ellene, alvira) Outrival(ellene, alvira) and Outrival(ellene, alvira) -> Bogey(ellene, alvira) -> therefore Bogey(ellene, alvira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The cecelia is mirrored. The madelina wield the cecelia. If something reprimand the cecelia then it is pictural. If the cecelia reprimand the madelina and the cecelia is impossible then the madelina pigment the cecelia. If something pigment the madelina and it is resonating then the madelina reprimand the cecelia. If something reprimand the madelina then it wield the cecelia. If the madelina wield the cecelia then the cecelia pigment the madelina. If something reprimand the madelina and the madelina wield the cecelia then the madelina is resonating. If the madelina is mirrored and the madelina is impossible then the madelina reprimand the cecelia. If the cecelia pigment the madelina then the cecelia reprimand the madelina. The madelina is resonating.", "logic": "\nMirrored(cecelia)\nWield(madelina, cecelia)\nforall x (Reprimand(x, cecelia) -> Pictural(x))\nReprimand(cecelia, madelina) and Impossible(cecelia) -> Pigment(madelina, cecelia)\nforall x (Pigment(x, madelina) and Resonating(x) -> Reprimand(madelina, cecelia))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, madelina) -> Wield(x, cecelia))\nWield(madelina, cecelia) -> Pigment(cecelia, madelina)\nforall x (Reprimand(x, madelina) and Wield(madelina, cecelia) -> Resonating(madelina))\nMirrored(madelina) and Impossible(madelina) -> Reprimand(madelina, cecelia)\nPigment(cecelia, madelina) -> Reprimand(cecelia, madelina)\n\nResonating(madelina)\n\nWield(madelina, cecelia) and Wield(madelina, cecelia) -> Pigment(cecelia, madelina) -> therefore Pigment(cecelia, madelina) Pigment(cecelia, madelina) and Pigment(cecelia, madelina) -> Reprimand(cecelia, madelina) -> therefore Reprimand(cecelia, madelina) Reprimand(cecelia, madelina) and Wield(madelina, cecelia) and forall x (Reprimand(x, madelina) and Wield(madelina, cecelia) -> Resonating(madelina)) -> therefore Resonating(madelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The shantee is marsupial. The sissy virilize the shantee. If something obsolesce the shantee then it is titular. If the shantee obsolesce the sissy and the shantee is stewed then the sissy aggregate the shantee. If something aggregate the sissy and it is boon then the sissy obsolesce the shantee. If something obsolesce the sissy then it virilize the shantee. If the sissy virilize the shantee then the shantee aggregate the sissy. If something obsolesce the sissy and the sissy virilize the shantee then the sissy is boon. If the sissy is marsupial and the sissy is stewed then the sissy obsolesce the shantee. If the shantee aggregate the sissy then the shantee obsolesce the sissy. The shantee does not like the shantee.", "logic": "\nMarsupial(shantee)\nVirilize(sissy, shantee)\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, shantee) -> Titular(x))\nObsolesce(shantee, sissy) and Stewed(shantee) -> Aggregate(sissy, shantee)\nforall x (Aggregate(x, sissy) and Boon(x) -> Obsolesce(sissy, shantee))\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, sissy) -> Virilize(x, shantee))\nVirilize(sissy, shantee) -> Aggregate(shantee, sissy)\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, sissy) and Virilize(sissy, shantee) -> Boon(sissy))\nMarsupial(sissy) and Stewed(sissy) -> Obsolesce(sissy, shantee)\nAggregate(shantee, sissy) -> Obsolesce(shantee, sissy)\n\nnot Virilize(shantee, shantee)\n\nVirilize(sissy, shantee) and Virilize(sissy, shantee) -> Aggregate(shantee, sissy) -> therefore Aggregate(shantee, sissy) Aggregate(shantee, sissy) and Aggregate(shantee, sissy) -> Obsolesce(shantee, sissy) -> therefore Obsolesce(shantee, sissy) Obsolesce(shantee, sissy) and forall x (Obsolesce(x, sissy) -> Virilize(x, shantee)) -> therefore Virilize(shantee, shantee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The rebe is actinic. The ilsa swindle the rebe. If something revere the rebe then it is adipose. If the rebe revere the ilsa and the rebe is mutational then the ilsa perforate the rebe. If something perforate the ilsa and it is twelfth then the ilsa revere the rebe. If something revere the ilsa then it swindle the rebe. If the ilsa swindle the rebe then the rebe perforate the ilsa. If something revere the ilsa and the ilsa swindle the rebe then the ilsa is twelfth. If the ilsa is actinic and the ilsa is mutational then the ilsa revere the rebe. If the rebe perforate the ilsa then the rebe revere the ilsa. The rebe is not adipose.", "logic": "\nActinic(rebe)\nSwindle(ilsa, rebe)\nforall x (Revere(x, rebe) -> Adipose(x))\nRevere(rebe, ilsa) and Mutational(rebe) -> Perforate(ilsa, rebe)\nforall x (Perforate(x, ilsa) and Twelfth(x) -> Revere(ilsa, rebe))\nforall x (Revere(x, ilsa) -> Swindle(x, rebe))\nSwindle(ilsa, rebe) -> Perforate(rebe, ilsa)\nforall x (Revere(x, ilsa) and Swindle(ilsa, rebe) -> Twelfth(ilsa))\nActinic(ilsa) and Mutational(ilsa) -> Revere(ilsa, rebe)\nPerforate(rebe, ilsa) -> Revere(rebe, ilsa)\n\nnot Adipose(rebe)\n\nforall x (Revere(x, rebe) -> Adipose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The ruben is unshoed. The aura orate the ruben. If something lust the ruben then it is scorched. If the ruben lust the aura and the ruben is mesmeric then the aura decide the ruben. If something decide the aura and it is stubborn then the aura lust the ruben. If something lust the aura then it orate the ruben. If the aura orate the ruben then the ruben decide the aura. If something lust the aura and the aura orate the ruben then the aura is stubborn. If the aura is unshoed and the aura is mesmeric then the aura lust the ruben. If the ruben decide the aura then the ruben lust the aura. The aura lust the ruben.", "logic": "\nUnshoed(ruben)\nOrate(aura, ruben)\nforall x (Lust(x, ruben) -> Scorched(x))\nLust(ruben, aura) and Mesmeric(ruben) -> Decide(aura, ruben)\nforall x (Decide(x, aura) and Stubborn(x) -> Lust(aura, ruben))\nforall x (Lust(x, aura) -> Orate(x, ruben))\nOrate(aura, ruben) -> Decide(ruben, aura)\nforall x (Lust(x, aura) and Orate(aura, ruben) -> Stubborn(aura))\nUnshoed(aura) and Mesmeric(aura) -> Lust(aura, ruben)\nDecide(ruben, aura) -> Lust(ruben, aura)\n\nLust(aura, ruben)\n\nforall x (Decide(x, aura) and Stubborn(x) -> Lust(aura, ruben)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The brigid is ratable. The vite dissociate the brigid. If something room the brigid then it is podlike. If the brigid room the vite and the brigid is unusable then the vite colorise the brigid. If something colorise the vite and it is permissive then the vite room the brigid. If something room the vite then it dissociate the brigid. If the vite dissociate the brigid then the brigid colorise the vite. If something room the vite and the vite dissociate the brigid then the vite is permissive. If the vite is ratable and the vite is unusable then the vite room the brigid. If the brigid colorise the vite then the brigid room the vite. The vite does not see the brigid.", "logic": "\nRatable(brigid)\nDissociate(vite, brigid)\nforall x (Room(x, brigid) -> Podlike(x))\nRoom(brigid, vite) and Unusable(brigid) -> Colorise(vite, brigid)\nforall x (Colorise(x, vite) and Permissive(x) -> Room(vite, brigid))\nforall x (Room(x, vite) -> Dissociate(x, brigid))\nDissociate(vite, brigid) -> Colorise(brigid, vite)\nforall x (Room(x, vite) and Dissociate(vite, brigid) -> Permissive(vite))\nRatable(vite) and Unusable(vite) -> Room(vite, brigid)\nColorise(brigid, vite) -> Room(brigid, vite)\n\nnot Colorise(vite, brigid)\n\nRoom(brigid, vite) and Unusable(brigid) -> Colorise(vite, brigid) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The vivian is large. The karrah foredoom the vivian. If something glamourise the vivian then it is methylated. If the vivian glamourise the karrah and the vivian is afloat then the karrah conglobe the vivian. If something conglobe the karrah and it is enumerable then the karrah glamourise the vivian. If something glamourise the karrah then it foredoom the vivian. If the karrah foredoom the vivian then the vivian conglobe the karrah. If something glamourise the karrah and the karrah foredoom the vivian then the karrah is enumerable. If the karrah is large and the karrah is afloat then the karrah glamourise the vivian. If the vivian conglobe the karrah then the vivian glamourise the karrah. The karrah is methylated.", "logic": "\nLarge(vivian)\nForedoom(karrah, vivian)\nforall x (Glamourise(x, vivian) -> Methylated(x))\nGlamourise(vivian, karrah) and Afloat(vivian) -> Conglobe(karrah, vivian)\nforall x (Conglobe(x, karrah) and Enumerable(x) -> Glamourise(karrah, vivian))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, karrah) -> Foredoom(x, vivian))\nForedoom(karrah, vivian) -> Conglobe(vivian, karrah)\nforall x (Glamourise(x, karrah) and Foredoom(karrah, vivian) -> Enumerable(karrah))\nLarge(karrah) and Afloat(karrah) -> Glamourise(karrah, vivian)\nConglobe(vivian, karrah) -> Glamourise(vivian, karrah)\n\nMethylated(karrah)\n\nforall x (Glamourise(x, vivian) -> Methylated(x)) <- forall x (Conglobe(x, karrah) and Enumerable(x) -> Glamourise(karrah, vivian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The juanita is womanish. The jesus page the juanita. If something stopper the juanita then it is fooling. If the juanita stopper the jesus and the juanita is tabular then the jesus verbify the juanita. If something verbify the jesus and it is antibiotic then the jesus stopper the juanita. If something stopper the jesus then it page the juanita. If the jesus page the juanita then the juanita verbify the jesus. If something stopper the jesus and the jesus page the juanita then the jesus is antibiotic. If the jesus is womanish and the jesus is tabular then the jesus stopper the juanita. If the juanita verbify the jesus then the juanita stopper the jesus. The jesus does not chase the jesus.", "logic": "\nWomanish(juanita)\nPage(jesus, juanita)\nforall x (Stopper(x, juanita) -> Fooling(x))\nStopper(juanita, jesus) and Tabular(juanita) -> Verbify(jesus, juanita)\nforall x (Verbify(x, jesus) and Antibiotic(x) -> Stopper(jesus, juanita))\nforall x (Stopper(x, jesus) -> Page(x, juanita))\nPage(jesus, juanita) -> Verbify(juanita, jesus)\nforall x (Stopper(x, jesus) and Page(jesus, juanita) -> Antibiotic(jesus))\nWomanish(jesus) and Tabular(jesus) -> Stopper(jesus, juanita)\nVerbify(juanita, jesus) -> Stopper(juanita, jesus)\n\nnot Stopper(jesus, jesus)\n\nnot Stopper(jesus, jesus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The nikkie is awny. The chauncey daydream the nikkie. If something caper the nikkie then it is spacy. If the nikkie caper the chauncey and the nikkie is natal then the chauncey sleek the nikkie. If something sleek the chauncey and it is deferent then the chauncey caper the nikkie. If something caper the chauncey then it daydream the nikkie. If the chauncey daydream the nikkie then the nikkie sleek the chauncey. If something caper the chauncey and the chauncey daydream the nikkie then the chauncey is deferent. If the chauncey is awny and the chauncey is natal then the chauncey caper the nikkie. If the nikkie sleek the chauncey then the nikkie caper the chauncey. The chauncey daydream the chauncey.", "logic": "\nAwny(nikkie)\nDaydream(chauncey, nikkie)\nforall x (Caper(x, nikkie) -> Spacy(x))\nCaper(nikkie, chauncey) and Natal(nikkie) -> Sleek(chauncey, nikkie)\nforall x (Sleek(x, chauncey) and Deferent(x) -> Caper(chauncey, nikkie))\nforall x (Caper(x, chauncey) -> Daydream(x, nikkie))\nDaydream(chauncey, nikkie) -> Sleek(nikkie, chauncey)\nforall x (Caper(x, chauncey) and Daydream(chauncey, nikkie) -> Deferent(chauncey))\nAwny(chauncey) and Natal(chauncey) -> Caper(chauncey, nikkie)\nSleek(nikkie, chauncey) -> Caper(nikkie, chauncey)\n\nDaydream(chauncey, chauncey)\n\nDaydream(chauncey, chauncey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The madeleine is eldest. The arabel cozen the madeleine. If something razor the madeleine then it is stabile. If the madeleine razor the arabel and the madeleine is unsanded then the arabel pacify the madeleine. If something pacify the arabel and it is paranasal then the arabel razor the madeleine. If something razor the arabel then it cozen the madeleine. If the arabel cozen the madeleine then the madeleine pacify the arabel. If something razor the arabel and the arabel cozen the madeleine then the arabel is paranasal. If the arabel is eldest and the arabel is unsanded then the arabel razor the madeleine. If the madeleine pacify the arabel then the madeleine razor the arabel. The madeleine is not paranasal.", "logic": "\nEldest(madeleine)\nCozen(arabel, madeleine)\nforall x (Razor(x, madeleine) -> Stabile(x))\nRazor(madeleine, arabel) and Unsanded(madeleine) -> Pacify(arabel, madeleine)\nforall x (Pacify(x, arabel) and Paranasal(x) -> Razor(arabel, madeleine))\nforall x (Razor(x, arabel) -> Cozen(x, madeleine))\nCozen(arabel, madeleine) -> Pacify(madeleine, arabel)\nforall x (Razor(x, arabel) and Cozen(arabel, madeleine) -> Paranasal(arabel))\nEldest(arabel) and Unsanded(arabel) -> Razor(arabel, madeleine)\nPacify(madeleine, arabel) -> Razor(madeleine, arabel)\n\nnot Paranasal(madeleine)\n\nnot Paranasal(madeleine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The veriee is stigmatic. The collie date the veriee. If something visualize the veriee then it is warped. If the veriee visualize the collie and the veriee is unvendible then the collie chunk the veriee. If something chunk the collie and it is medial then the collie visualize the veriee. If something visualize the collie then it date the veriee. If the collie date the veriee then the veriee chunk the collie. If something visualize the collie and the collie date the veriee then the collie is medial. If the collie is stigmatic and the collie is unvendible then the collie visualize the veriee. If the veriee chunk the collie then the veriee visualize the collie. The veriee is unvendible.", "logic": "\nStigmatic(veriee)\nDate(collie, veriee)\nforall x (Visualize(x, veriee) -> Warped(x))\nVisualize(veriee, collie) and Unvendible(veriee) -> Chunk(collie, veriee)\nforall x (Chunk(x, collie) and Medial(x) -> Visualize(collie, veriee))\nforall x (Visualize(x, collie) -> Date(x, veriee))\nDate(collie, veriee) -> Chunk(veriee, collie)\nforall x (Visualize(x, collie) and Date(collie, veriee) -> Medial(collie))\nStigmatic(collie) and Unvendible(collie) -> Visualize(collie, veriee)\nChunk(veriee, collie) -> Visualize(veriee, collie)\n\nUnvendible(veriee)\n\nUnvendible(veriee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The bonita trump the perri. The bonita encircle the noel. The noel scheme the bonita. The noel does not eat the bonita. The noel trump the perri. The noel is not orange. The noel is majestic. The noel does not need the bonita. The noel encircle the perri. The perri scheme the bonita. The perri trump the noel. The perri is majestic. If the noel trump the bonita then the bonita does not chase the noel. If someone is bypast then they need the perri. If someone encircle the noel and the noel is invariable then they are bypast. If someone scheme the bonita and they do not eat the perri then they eat the bonita. If someone is choragic then they eat the bonita. If someone scheme the bonita and they eat the noel then the noel is invariable. If the noel trump the bonita and the bonita scheme the perri then the bonita is choragic. If someone encircle the perri and they are not majestic then the perri does not need the noel. The perri trump the noel.", "logic": "\nTrump(bonita, perri)\nEncircle(bonita, noel)\nScheme(noel, bonita)\nnot Trump(noel, bonita)\nTrump(noel, perri)\nnot Orange(noel)\nMajestic(noel)\nnot Encircle(noel, bonita)\nEncircle(noel, perri)\nScheme(perri, bonita)\nTrump(perri, noel)\nMajestic(perri)\nTrump(noel, bonita) -> not Scheme(bonita, noel)\nforall x (Bypast(x) -> Encircle(x, perri))\nforall x (Encircle(x, noel) and Invariable(noel) -> Bypast(x))\nforall x (Scheme(x, bonita) and not Trump(x, perri) -> Trump(x, bonita))\nforall x (Choragic(x) -> Trump(x, bonita))\nforall x (Scheme(x, bonita) and Trump(x, noel) -> Invariable(noel))\nTrump(noel, bonita) and Scheme(bonita, perri) -> Choragic(bonita)\nforall x (Encircle(x, perri) and not Majestic(x) -> not Encircle(perri, noel))\n\nTrump(perri, noel)\n\ntherefore Trump(perri, noel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The andrey hesitate the gerta. The andrey tower the florry. The florry buttonhole the andrey. The florry does not eat the andrey. The florry hesitate the gerta. The florry is not unstilted. The florry is quantal. The florry does not need the andrey. The florry tower the gerta. The gerta buttonhole the andrey. The gerta hesitate the florry. The gerta is quantal. If the florry hesitate the andrey then the andrey does not chase the florry. If someone is beechen then they need the gerta. If someone tower the florry and the florry is impetuous then they are beechen. If someone buttonhole the andrey and they do not eat the gerta then they eat the andrey. If someone is scummy then they eat the andrey. If someone buttonhole the andrey and they eat the florry then the florry is impetuous. If the florry hesitate the andrey and the andrey buttonhole the gerta then the andrey is scummy. If someone tower the gerta and they are not quantal then the gerta does not need the florry. The gerta does not chase the andrey.", "logic": "\nHesitate(andrey, gerta)\nTower(andrey, florry)\nButtonhole(florry, andrey)\nnot Hesitate(florry, andrey)\nHesitate(florry, gerta)\nnot Unstilted(florry)\nQuantal(florry)\nnot Tower(florry, andrey)\nTower(florry, gerta)\nButtonhole(gerta, andrey)\nHesitate(gerta, florry)\nQuantal(gerta)\nHesitate(florry, andrey) -> not Buttonhole(andrey, florry)\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> Tower(x, gerta))\nforall x (Tower(x, florry) and Impetuous(florry) -> Beechen(x))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, andrey) and not Hesitate(x, gerta) -> Hesitate(x, andrey))\nforall x (Scummy(x) -> Hesitate(x, andrey))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, andrey) and Hesitate(x, florry) -> Impetuous(florry))\nHesitate(florry, andrey) and Buttonhole(andrey, gerta) -> Scummy(andrey)\nforall x (Tower(x, gerta) and not Quantal(x) -> not Tower(gerta, florry))\n\nnot Buttonhole(gerta, andrey)\n\ntherefore Buttonhole(gerta, andrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The elonore furlough the albertina. The elonore withhold the talbert. The talbert motley the elonore. The talbert does not eat the elonore. The talbert furlough the albertina. The talbert is not allegretto. The talbert is crocketed. The talbert does not need the elonore. The talbert withhold the albertina. The albertina motley the elonore. The albertina furlough the talbert. The albertina is crocketed. If the talbert furlough the elonore then the elonore does not chase the talbert. If someone is acrophobic then they need the albertina. If someone withhold the talbert and the talbert is traitorous then they are acrophobic. If someone motley the elonore and they do not eat the albertina then they eat the elonore. If someone is thudding then they eat the elonore. If someone motley the elonore and they eat the talbert then the talbert is traitorous. If the talbert furlough the elonore and the elonore motley the albertina then the elonore is thudding. If someone withhold the albertina and they are not crocketed then the albertina does not need the talbert. The talbert is traitorous.", "logic": "\nFurlough(elonore, albertina)\nWithhold(elonore, talbert)\nMotley(talbert, elonore)\nnot Furlough(talbert, elonore)\nFurlough(talbert, albertina)\nnot Allegretto(talbert)\nCrocketed(talbert)\nnot Withhold(talbert, elonore)\nWithhold(talbert, albertina)\nMotley(albertina, elonore)\nFurlough(albertina, talbert)\nCrocketed(albertina)\nFurlough(talbert, elonore) -> not Motley(elonore, talbert)\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) -> Withhold(x, albertina))\nforall x (Withhold(x, talbert) and Traitorous(talbert) -> Acrophobic(x))\nforall x (Motley(x, elonore) and not Furlough(x, albertina) -> Furlough(x, elonore))\nforall x (Thudding(x) -> Furlough(x, elonore))\nforall x (Motley(x, elonore) and Furlough(x, talbert) -> Traitorous(talbert))\nFurlough(talbert, elonore) and Motley(elonore, albertina) -> Thudding(elonore)\nforall x (Withhold(x, albertina) and not Crocketed(x) -> not Withhold(albertina, talbert))\n\nTraitorous(talbert)\n\nMotley(albertina, elonore) and Furlough(albertina, talbert) and forall x (Motley(x, elonore) and Furlough(x, talbert) -> Traitorous(talbert)) -> therefore Traitorous(talbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The enid fire the myrtia. The enid store the kirsten. The kirsten wade the enid. The kirsten does not eat the enid. The kirsten fire the myrtia. The kirsten is not casteless. The kirsten is undreamed. The kirsten does not need the enid. The kirsten store the myrtia. The myrtia wade the enid. The myrtia fire the kirsten. The myrtia is undreamed. If the kirsten fire the enid then the enid does not chase the kirsten. If someone is acetabular then they need the myrtia. If someone store the kirsten and the kirsten is described then they are acetabular. If someone wade the enid and they do not eat the myrtia then they eat the enid. If someone is syrian then they eat the enid. If someone wade the enid and they eat the kirsten then the kirsten is described. If the kirsten fire the enid and the enid wade the myrtia then the enid is syrian. If someone store the myrtia and they are not undreamed then the myrtia does not need the kirsten. The kirsten is not described.", "logic": "\nFire(enid, myrtia)\nStore(enid, kirsten)\nWade(kirsten, enid)\nnot Fire(kirsten, enid)\nFire(kirsten, myrtia)\nnot Casteless(kirsten)\nUndreamed(kirsten)\nnot Store(kirsten, enid)\nStore(kirsten, myrtia)\nWade(myrtia, enid)\nFire(myrtia, kirsten)\nUndreamed(myrtia)\nFire(kirsten, enid) -> not Wade(enid, kirsten)\nforall x (Acetabular(x) -> Store(x, myrtia))\nforall x (Store(x, kirsten) and Described(kirsten) -> Acetabular(x))\nforall x (Wade(x, enid) and not Fire(x, myrtia) -> Fire(x, enid))\nforall x (Syrian(x) -> Fire(x, enid))\nforall x (Wade(x, enid) and Fire(x, kirsten) -> Described(kirsten))\nFire(kirsten, enid) and Wade(enid, myrtia) -> Syrian(enid)\nforall x (Store(x, myrtia) and not Undreamed(x) -> not Store(myrtia, kirsten))\n\nnot Described(kirsten)\n\nWade(myrtia, enid) and Fire(myrtia, kirsten) and forall x (Wade(x, enid) and Fire(x, kirsten) -> Described(kirsten)) -> therefore Described(kirsten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The dixie motorise the marlena. The dixie dandify the erminia. The erminia immobilize the dixie. The erminia does not eat the dixie. The erminia motorise the marlena. The erminia is not tenured. The erminia is caudal. The erminia does not need the dixie. The erminia dandify the marlena. The marlena immobilize the dixie. The marlena motorise the erminia. The marlena is caudal. If the erminia motorise the dixie then the dixie does not chase the erminia. If someone is connatural then they need the marlena. If someone dandify the erminia and the erminia is uremic then they are connatural. If someone immobilize the dixie and they do not eat the marlena then they eat the dixie. If someone is palatial then they eat the dixie. If someone immobilize the dixie and they eat the erminia then the erminia is uremic. If the erminia motorise the dixie and the dixie immobilize the marlena then the dixie is palatial. If someone dandify the marlena and they are not caudal then the marlena does not need the erminia. The dixie is connatural.", "logic": "\nMotorise(dixie, marlena)\nDandify(dixie, erminia)\nImmobilize(erminia, dixie)\nnot Motorise(erminia, dixie)\nMotorise(erminia, marlena)\nnot Tenured(erminia)\nCaudal(erminia)\nnot Dandify(erminia, dixie)\nDandify(erminia, marlena)\nImmobilize(marlena, dixie)\nMotorise(marlena, erminia)\nCaudal(marlena)\nMotorise(erminia, dixie) -> not Immobilize(dixie, erminia)\nforall x (Connatural(x) -> Dandify(x, marlena))\nforall x (Dandify(x, erminia) and Uremic(erminia) -> Connatural(x))\nforall x (Immobilize(x, dixie) and not Motorise(x, marlena) -> Motorise(x, dixie))\nforall x (Palatial(x) -> Motorise(x, dixie))\nforall x (Immobilize(x, dixie) and Motorise(x, erminia) -> Uremic(erminia))\nMotorise(erminia, dixie) and Immobilize(dixie, marlena) -> Palatial(dixie)\nforall x (Dandify(x, marlena) and not Caudal(x) -> not Dandify(marlena, erminia))\n\nConnatural(dixie)\n\nImmobilize(marlena, dixie) and Motorise(marlena, erminia) and forall x (Immobilize(x, dixie) and Motorise(x, erminia) -> Uremic(erminia)) -> therefore Uremic(erminia) Dandify(dixie, erminia) and Uremic(erminia) and forall x (Dandify(x, erminia) and Uremic(erminia) -> Connatural(x)) -> therefore Connatural(dixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The lyndsay bloviate the gwendolen. The lyndsay eddy the pennie. The pennie gentrify the lyndsay. The pennie does not eat the lyndsay. The pennie bloviate the gwendolen. The pennie is not rococo. The pennie is bidentate. The pennie does not need the lyndsay. The pennie eddy the gwendolen. The gwendolen gentrify the lyndsay. The gwendolen bloviate the pennie. The gwendolen is bidentate. If the pennie bloviate the lyndsay then the lyndsay does not chase the pennie. If someone is formed then they need the gwendolen. If someone eddy the pennie and the pennie is unfixed then they are formed. If someone gentrify the lyndsay and they do not eat the gwendolen then they eat the lyndsay. If someone is younger then they eat the lyndsay. If someone gentrify the lyndsay and they eat the pennie then the pennie is unfixed. If the pennie bloviate the lyndsay and the lyndsay gentrify the gwendolen then the lyndsay is younger. If someone eddy the gwendolen and they are not bidentate then the gwendolen does not need the pennie. The lyndsay is not formed.", "logic": "\nBloviate(lyndsay, gwendolen)\nEddy(lyndsay, pennie)\nGentrify(pennie, lyndsay)\nnot Bloviate(pennie, lyndsay)\nBloviate(pennie, gwendolen)\nnot Rococo(pennie)\nBidentate(pennie)\nnot Eddy(pennie, lyndsay)\nEddy(pennie, gwendolen)\nGentrify(gwendolen, lyndsay)\nBloviate(gwendolen, pennie)\nBidentate(gwendolen)\nBloviate(pennie, lyndsay) -> not Gentrify(lyndsay, pennie)\nforall x (Formed(x) -> Eddy(x, gwendolen))\nforall x (Eddy(x, pennie) and Unfixed(pennie) -> Formed(x))\nforall x (Gentrify(x, lyndsay) and not Bloviate(x, gwendolen) -> Bloviate(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Younger(x) -> Bloviate(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Gentrify(x, lyndsay) and Bloviate(x, pennie) -> Unfixed(pennie))\nBloviate(pennie, lyndsay) and Gentrify(lyndsay, gwendolen) -> Younger(lyndsay)\nforall x (Eddy(x, gwendolen) and not Bidentate(x) -> not Eddy(gwendolen, pennie))\n\nnot Formed(lyndsay)\n\nGentrify(gwendolen, lyndsay) and Bloviate(gwendolen, pennie) and forall x (Gentrify(x, lyndsay) and Bloviate(x, pennie) -> Unfixed(pennie)) -> therefore Unfixed(pennie) Eddy(lyndsay, pennie) and Unfixed(pennie) and forall x (Eddy(x, pennie) and Unfixed(pennie) -> Formed(x)) -> therefore Formed(lyndsay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The pen chorus the duffy. The pen permit the mariana. The mariana inter the pen. The mariana does not eat the pen. The mariana chorus the duffy. The mariana is not senegalese. The mariana is thankless. The mariana does not need the pen. The mariana permit the duffy. The duffy inter the pen. The duffy chorus the mariana. The duffy is thankless. If the mariana chorus the pen then the pen does not chase the mariana. If someone is peppy then they need the duffy. If someone permit the mariana and the mariana is cutaneal then they are peppy. If someone inter the pen and they do not eat the duffy then they eat the pen. If someone is rosy then they eat the pen. If someone inter the pen and they eat the mariana then the mariana is cutaneal. If the mariana chorus the pen and the pen inter the duffy then the pen is rosy. If someone permit the duffy and they are not thankless then the duffy does not need the mariana. The pen permit the duffy.", "logic": "\nChorus(pen, duffy)\nPermit(pen, mariana)\nInter(mariana, pen)\nnot Chorus(mariana, pen)\nChorus(mariana, duffy)\nnot Senegalese(mariana)\nThankless(mariana)\nnot Permit(mariana, pen)\nPermit(mariana, duffy)\nInter(duffy, pen)\nChorus(duffy, mariana)\nThankless(duffy)\nChorus(mariana, pen) -> not Inter(pen, mariana)\nforall x (Peppy(x) -> Permit(x, duffy))\nforall x (Permit(x, mariana) and Cutaneal(mariana) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Inter(x, pen) and not Chorus(x, duffy) -> Chorus(x, pen))\nforall x (Rosy(x) -> Chorus(x, pen))\nforall x (Inter(x, pen) and Chorus(x, mariana) -> Cutaneal(mariana))\nChorus(mariana, pen) and Inter(pen, duffy) -> Rosy(pen)\nforall x (Permit(x, duffy) and not Thankless(x) -> not Permit(duffy, mariana))\n\nPermit(pen, duffy)\n\nInter(duffy, pen) and Chorus(duffy, mariana) and forall x (Inter(x, pen) and Chorus(x, mariana) -> Cutaneal(mariana)) -> therefore Cutaneal(mariana) Permit(pen, mariana) and Cutaneal(mariana) and forall x (Permit(x, mariana) and Cutaneal(mariana) -> Peppy(x)) -> therefore Peppy(pen) Peppy(pen) and forall x (Peppy(x) -> Permit(x, duffy)) -> therefore Permit(pen, duffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The trina illegalize the andy. The trina reassess the enya. The enya nitrate the trina. The enya does not eat the trina. The enya illegalize the andy. The enya is not modified. The enya is vital. The enya does not need the trina. The enya reassess the andy. The andy nitrate the trina. The andy illegalize the enya. The andy is vital. If the enya illegalize the trina then the trina does not chase the enya. If someone is writhing then they need the andy. If someone reassess the enya and the enya is stocky then they are writhing. If someone nitrate the trina and they do not eat the andy then they eat the trina. If someone is lucifugous then they eat the trina. If someone nitrate the trina and they eat the enya then the enya is stocky. If the enya illegalize the trina and the trina nitrate the andy then the trina is lucifugous. If someone reassess the andy and they are not vital then the andy does not need the enya. The trina does not need the andy.", "logic": "\nIllegalize(trina, andy)\nReassess(trina, enya)\nNitrate(enya, trina)\nnot Illegalize(enya, trina)\nIllegalize(enya, andy)\nnot Modified(enya)\nVital(enya)\nnot Reassess(enya, trina)\nReassess(enya, andy)\nNitrate(andy, trina)\nIllegalize(andy, enya)\nVital(andy)\nIllegalize(enya, trina) -> not Nitrate(trina, enya)\nforall x (Writhing(x) -> Reassess(x, andy))\nforall x (Reassess(x, enya) and Stocky(enya) -> Writhing(x))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, trina) and not Illegalize(x, andy) -> Illegalize(x, trina))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) -> Illegalize(x, trina))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, trina) and Illegalize(x, enya) -> Stocky(enya))\nIllegalize(enya, trina) and Nitrate(trina, andy) -> Lucifugous(trina)\nforall x (Reassess(x, andy) and not Vital(x) -> not Reassess(andy, enya))\n\nnot Reassess(trina, andy)\n\nNitrate(andy, trina) and Illegalize(andy, enya) and forall x (Nitrate(x, trina) and Illegalize(x, enya) -> Stocky(enya)) -> therefore Stocky(enya) Reassess(trina, enya) and Stocky(enya) and forall x (Reassess(x, enya) and Stocky(enya) -> Writhing(x)) -> therefore Writhing(trina) Writhing(trina) and forall x (Writhing(x) -> Reassess(x, andy)) -> therefore Reassess(trina, andy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The loreen airbrush the scottie. The loreen disinvolve the aretha. The aretha mask the loreen. The aretha does not eat the loreen. The aretha airbrush the scottie. The aretha is not cxxxv. The aretha is ergotropic. The aretha does not need the loreen. The aretha disinvolve the scottie. The scottie mask the loreen. The scottie airbrush the aretha. The scottie is ergotropic. If the aretha airbrush the loreen then the loreen does not chase the aretha. If someone is unexcelled then they need the scottie. If someone disinvolve the aretha and the aretha is unexplored then they are unexcelled. If someone mask the loreen and they do not eat the scottie then they eat the loreen. If someone is uninitiate then they eat the loreen. If someone mask the loreen and they eat the aretha then the aretha is unexplored. If the aretha airbrush the loreen and the loreen mask the scottie then the loreen is uninitiate. If someone disinvolve the scottie and they are not ergotropic then the scottie does not need the aretha. The scottie is not unexcelled.", "logic": "\nAirbrush(loreen, scottie)\nDisinvolve(loreen, aretha)\nMask(aretha, loreen)\nnot Airbrush(aretha, loreen)\nAirbrush(aretha, scottie)\nnot Cxxxv(aretha)\nErgotropic(aretha)\nnot Disinvolve(aretha, loreen)\nDisinvolve(aretha, scottie)\nMask(scottie, loreen)\nAirbrush(scottie, aretha)\nErgotropic(scottie)\nAirbrush(aretha, loreen) -> not Mask(loreen, aretha)\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Disinvolve(x, scottie))\nforall x (Disinvolve(x, aretha) and Unexplored(aretha) -> Unexcelled(x))\nforall x (Mask(x, loreen) and not Airbrush(x, scottie) -> Airbrush(x, loreen))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Airbrush(x, loreen))\nforall x (Mask(x, loreen) and Airbrush(x, aretha) -> Unexplored(aretha))\nAirbrush(aretha, loreen) and Mask(loreen, scottie) -> Uninitiate(loreen)\nforall x (Disinvolve(x, scottie) and not Ergotropic(x) -> not Disinvolve(scottie, aretha))\n\nnot Unexcelled(scottie)\n\nforall x (Disinvolve(x, aretha) and Unexplored(aretha) -> Unexcelled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The cameo mismarry the carolan. The cameo invent the upton. The upton people the cameo. The upton does not eat the cameo. The upton mismarry the carolan. The upton is not peaceful. The upton is lifelike. The upton does not need the cameo. The upton invent the carolan. The carolan people the cameo. The carolan mismarry the upton. The carolan is lifelike. If the upton mismarry the cameo then the cameo does not chase the upton. If someone is shot then they need the carolan. If someone invent the upton and the upton is crocked then they are shot. If someone people the cameo and they do not eat the carolan then they eat the cameo. If someone is erstwhile then they eat the cameo. If someone people the cameo and they eat the upton then the upton is crocked. If the upton mismarry the cameo and the cameo people the carolan then the cameo is erstwhile. If someone invent the carolan and they are not lifelike then the carolan does not need the upton. The upton is shot.", "logic": "\nMismarry(cameo, carolan)\nInvent(cameo, upton)\nPeople(upton, cameo)\nnot Mismarry(upton, cameo)\nMismarry(upton, carolan)\nnot Peaceful(upton)\nLifelike(upton)\nnot Invent(upton, cameo)\nInvent(upton, carolan)\nPeople(carolan, cameo)\nMismarry(carolan, upton)\nLifelike(carolan)\nMismarry(upton, cameo) -> not People(cameo, upton)\nforall x (Shot(x) -> Invent(x, carolan))\nforall x (Invent(x, upton) and Crocked(upton) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (People(x, cameo) and not Mismarry(x, carolan) -> Mismarry(x, cameo))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Mismarry(x, cameo))\nforall x (People(x, cameo) and Mismarry(x, upton) -> Crocked(upton))\nMismarry(upton, cameo) and People(cameo, carolan) -> Erstwhile(cameo)\nforall x (Invent(x, carolan) and not Lifelike(x) -> not Invent(carolan, upton))\n\nShot(upton)\n\nforall x (Invent(x, upton) and Crocked(upton) -> Shot(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The kirsteni delineate the nani. The kirsteni rubberize the reina. The reina reset the kirsteni. The reina does not eat the kirsteni. The reina delineate the nani. The reina is not easy. The reina is glorified. The reina does not need the kirsteni. The reina rubberize the nani. The nani reset the kirsteni. The nani delineate the reina. The nani is glorified. If the reina delineate the kirsteni then the kirsteni does not chase the reina. If someone is rimy then they need the nani. If someone rubberize the reina and the reina is square then they are rimy. If someone reset the kirsteni and they do not eat the nani then they eat the kirsteni. If someone is direful then they eat the kirsteni. If someone reset the kirsteni and they eat the reina then the reina is square. If the reina delineate the kirsteni and the kirsteni reset the nani then the kirsteni is direful. If someone rubberize the nani and they are not glorified then the nani does not need the reina. The nani does not eat the kirsteni.", "logic": "\nDelineate(kirsteni, nani)\nRubberize(kirsteni, reina)\nReset(reina, kirsteni)\nnot Delineate(reina, kirsteni)\nDelineate(reina, nani)\nnot Easy(reina)\nGlorified(reina)\nnot Rubberize(reina, kirsteni)\nRubberize(reina, nani)\nReset(nani, kirsteni)\nDelineate(nani, reina)\nGlorified(nani)\nDelineate(reina, kirsteni) -> not Reset(kirsteni, reina)\nforall x (Rimy(x) -> Rubberize(x, nani))\nforall x (Rubberize(x, reina) and Square(reina) -> Rimy(x))\nforall x (Reset(x, kirsteni) and not Delineate(x, nani) -> Delineate(x, kirsteni))\nforall x (Direful(x) -> Delineate(x, kirsteni))\nforall x (Reset(x, kirsteni) and Delineate(x, reina) -> Square(reina))\nDelineate(reina, kirsteni) and Reset(kirsteni, nani) -> Direful(kirsteni)\nforall x (Rubberize(x, nani) and not Glorified(x) -> not Rubberize(nani, reina))\n\nnot Delineate(nani, kirsteni)\n\nforall x (Reset(x, kirsteni) and not Delineate(x, nani) -> Delineate(x, kirsteni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The cate reposition the row. The cate butcher the jacquelyn. The jacquelyn divorce the cate. The jacquelyn does not eat the cate. The jacquelyn reposition the row. The jacquelyn is not sounding. The jacquelyn is down. The jacquelyn does not need the cate. The jacquelyn butcher the row. The row divorce the cate. The row reposition the jacquelyn. The row is down. If the jacquelyn reposition the cate then the cate does not chase the jacquelyn. If someone is grownup then they need the row. If someone butcher the jacquelyn and the jacquelyn is cuprous then they are grownup. If someone divorce the cate and they do not eat the row then they eat the cate. If someone is roofed then they eat the cate. If someone divorce the cate and they eat the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn is cuprous. If the jacquelyn reposition the cate and the cate divorce the row then the cate is roofed. If someone butcher the row and they are not down then the row does not need the jacquelyn. The cate is roofed.", "logic": "\nReposition(cate, row)\nButcher(cate, jacquelyn)\nDivorce(jacquelyn, cate)\nnot Reposition(jacquelyn, cate)\nReposition(jacquelyn, row)\nnot Sounding(jacquelyn)\nDown(jacquelyn)\nnot Butcher(jacquelyn, cate)\nButcher(jacquelyn, row)\nDivorce(row, cate)\nReposition(row, jacquelyn)\nDown(row)\nReposition(jacquelyn, cate) -> not Divorce(cate, jacquelyn)\nforall x (Grownup(x) -> Butcher(x, row))\nforall x (Butcher(x, jacquelyn) and Cuprous(jacquelyn) -> Grownup(x))\nforall x (Divorce(x, cate) and not Reposition(x, row) -> Reposition(x, cate))\nforall x (Roofed(x) -> Reposition(x, cate))\nforall x (Divorce(x, cate) and Reposition(x, jacquelyn) -> Cuprous(jacquelyn))\nReposition(jacquelyn, cate) and Divorce(cate, row) -> Roofed(cate)\nforall x (Butcher(x, row) and not Down(x) -> not Butcher(row, jacquelyn))\n\nRoofed(cate)\n\nReposition(jacquelyn, cate) and Divorce(cate, row) -> Roofed(cate) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The melodie brocade the christa. The melodie caparison the chadwick. The chadwick plumb the melodie. The chadwick does not eat the melodie. The chadwick brocade the christa. The chadwick is not amniotic. The chadwick is venereal. The chadwick does not need the melodie. The chadwick caparison the christa. The christa plumb the melodie. The christa brocade the chadwick. The christa is venereal. If the chadwick brocade the melodie then the melodie does not chase the chadwick. If someone is discrete then they need the christa. If someone caparison the chadwick and the chadwick is submerged then they are discrete. If someone plumb the melodie and they do not eat the christa then they eat the melodie. If someone is currish then they eat the melodie. If someone plumb the melodie and they eat the chadwick then the chadwick is submerged. If the chadwick brocade the melodie and the melodie plumb the christa then the melodie is currish. If someone caparison the christa and they are not venereal then the christa does not need the chadwick. The chadwick does not chase the chadwick.", "logic": "\nBrocade(melodie, christa)\nCaparison(melodie, chadwick)\nPlumb(chadwick, melodie)\nnot Brocade(chadwick, melodie)\nBrocade(chadwick, christa)\nnot Amniotic(chadwick)\nVenereal(chadwick)\nnot Caparison(chadwick, melodie)\nCaparison(chadwick, christa)\nPlumb(christa, melodie)\nBrocade(christa, chadwick)\nVenereal(christa)\nBrocade(chadwick, melodie) -> not Plumb(melodie, chadwick)\nforall x (Discrete(x) -> Caparison(x, christa))\nforall x (Caparison(x, chadwick) and Submerged(chadwick) -> Discrete(x))\nforall x (Plumb(x, melodie) and not Brocade(x, christa) -> Brocade(x, melodie))\nforall x (Currish(x) -> Brocade(x, melodie))\nforall x (Plumb(x, melodie) and Brocade(x, chadwick) -> Submerged(chadwick))\nBrocade(chadwick, melodie) and Plumb(melodie, christa) -> Currish(melodie)\nforall x (Caparison(x, christa) and not Venereal(x) -> not Caparison(christa, chadwick))\n\nnot Plumb(chadwick, chadwick)\n\nnot Plumb(chadwick, chadwick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The blayne ensconce the christina. The blayne bloody the brynn. The brynn unwind the blayne. The brynn does not eat the blayne. The brynn ensconce the christina. The brynn is not carbonylic. The brynn is neuter. The brynn does not need the blayne. The brynn bloody the christina. The christina unwind the blayne. The christina ensconce the brynn. The christina is neuter. If the brynn ensconce the blayne then the blayne does not chase the brynn. If someone is parlous then they need the christina. If someone bloody the brynn and the brynn is subalpine then they are parlous. If someone unwind the blayne and they do not eat the christina then they eat the blayne. If someone is trilingual then they eat the blayne. If someone unwind the blayne and they eat the brynn then the brynn is subalpine. If the brynn ensconce the blayne and the blayne unwind the christina then the blayne is trilingual. If someone bloody the christina and they are not neuter then the christina does not need the brynn. The blayne unwind the brynn.", "logic": "\nEnsconce(blayne, christina)\nBloody(blayne, brynn)\nUnwind(brynn, blayne)\nnot Ensconce(brynn, blayne)\nEnsconce(brynn, christina)\nnot Carbonylic(brynn)\nNeuter(brynn)\nnot Bloody(brynn, blayne)\nBloody(brynn, christina)\nUnwind(christina, blayne)\nEnsconce(christina, brynn)\nNeuter(christina)\nEnsconce(brynn, blayne) -> not Unwind(blayne, brynn)\nforall x (Parlous(x) -> Bloody(x, christina))\nforall x (Bloody(x, brynn) and Subalpine(brynn) -> Parlous(x))\nforall x (Unwind(x, blayne) and not Ensconce(x, christina) -> Ensconce(x, blayne))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) -> Ensconce(x, blayne))\nforall x (Unwind(x, blayne) and Ensconce(x, brynn) -> Subalpine(brynn))\nEnsconce(brynn, blayne) and Unwind(blayne, christina) -> Trilingual(blayne)\nforall x (Bloody(x, christina) and not Neuter(x) -> not Bloody(christina, brynn))\n\nUnwind(blayne, brynn)\n\nUnwind(blayne, brynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The leland spelunk the alfred. The leland yarn the thedric. The thedric voyage the leland. The thedric does not eat the leland. The thedric spelunk the alfred. The thedric is not braggy. The thedric is myotic. The thedric does not need the leland. The thedric yarn the alfred. The alfred voyage the leland. The alfred spelunk the thedric. The alfred is myotic. If the thedric spelunk the leland then the leland does not chase the thedric. If someone is whiplike then they need the alfred. If someone yarn the thedric and the thedric is oriented then they are whiplike. If someone voyage the leland and they do not eat the alfred then they eat the leland. If someone is lowbrowed then they eat the leland. If someone voyage the leland and they eat the thedric then the thedric is oriented. If the thedric spelunk the leland and the leland voyage the alfred then the leland is lowbrowed. If someone yarn the alfred and they are not myotic then the alfred does not need the thedric. The alfred is not lowbrowed.", "logic": "\nSpelunk(leland, alfred)\nYarn(leland, thedric)\nVoyage(thedric, leland)\nnot Spelunk(thedric, leland)\nSpelunk(thedric, alfred)\nnot Braggy(thedric)\nMyotic(thedric)\nnot Yarn(thedric, leland)\nYarn(thedric, alfred)\nVoyage(alfred, leland)\nSpelunk(alfred, thedric)\nMyotic(alfred)\nSpelunk(thedric, leland) -> not Voyage(leland, thedric)\nforall x (Whiplike(x) -> Yarn(x, alfred))\nforall x (Yarn(x, thedric) and Oriented(thedric) -> Whiplike(x))\nforall x (Voyage(x, leland) and not Spelunk(x, alfred) -> Spelunk(x, leland))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) -> Spelunk(x, leland))\nforall x (Voyage(x, leland) and Spelunk(x, thedric) -> Oriented(thedric))\nSpelunk(thedric, leland) and Voyage(leland, alfred) -> Lowbrowed(leland)\nforall x (Yarn(x, alfred) and not Myotic(x) -> not Yarn(alfred, thedric))\n\nnot Lowbrowed(alfred)\n\nnot Lowbrowed(alfred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The shellie sharpshoot the hamish. The shellie keen the brunhilda. The brunhilda analyse the shellie. The brunhilda does not eat the shellie. The brunhilda sharpshoot the hamish. The brunhilda is not dank. The brunhilda is discordant. The brunhilda does not need the shellie. The brunhilda keen the hamish. The hamish analyse the shellie. The hamish sharpshoot the brunhilda. The hamish is discordant. If the brunhilda sharpshoot the shellie then the shellie does not chase the brunhilda. If someone is blanketed then they need the hamish. If someone keen the brunhilda and the brunhilda is alkalotic then they are blanketed. If someone analyse the shellie and they do not eat the hamish then they eat the shellie. If someone is tomboyish then they eat the shellie. If someone analyse the shellie and they eat the brunhilda then the brunhilda is alkalotic. If the brunhilda sharpshoot the shellie and the shellie analyse the hamish then the shellie is tomboyish. If someone keen the hamish and they are not discordant then the hamish does not need the brunhilda. The shellie is dank.", "logic": "\nSharpshoot(shellie, hamish)\nKeen(shellie, brunhilda)\nAnalyse(brunhilda, shellie)\nnot Sharpshoot(brunhilda, shellie)\nSharpshoot(brunhilda, hamish)\nnot Dank(brunhilda)\nDiscordant(brunhilda)\nnot Keen(brunhilda, shellie)\nKeen(brunhilda, hamish)\nAnalyse(hamish, shellie)\nSharpshoot(hamish, brunhilda)\nDiscordant(hamish)\nSharpshoot(brunhilda, shellie) -> not Analyse(shellie, brunhilda)\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> Keen(x, hamish))\nforall x (Keen(x, brunhilda) and Alkalotic(brunhilda) -> Blanketed(x))\nforall x (Analyse(x, shellie) and not Sharpshoot(x, hamish) -> Sharpshoot(x, shellie))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) -> Sharpshoot(x, shellie))\nforall x (Analyse(x, shellie) and Sharpshoot(x, brunhilda) -> Alkalotic(brunhilda))\nSharpshoot(brunhilda, shellie) and Analyse(shellie, hamish) -> Tomboyish(shellie)\nforall x (Keen(x, hamish) and not Discordant(x) -> not Keen(hamish, brunhilda))\n\nDank(shellie)\n\nDank(shellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "Adora is aquatic. Horace is phrenic. Brianne is boskopoid. If Horace is hyperopic and Horace is aquatic then Horace is boskopoid. All hyperopic things are not boskopoid. White things are hyperopic. If something is hyperopic then it is phrenic. Red things are mastered. If something is flatbottom and not mastered then it is spiritless. Adora is aquatic.", "logic": "\nAquatic(adora)\nPhrenic(horace)\nBoskopoid(brianne)\nHyperopic(horace) and Aquatic(horace) -> Boskopoid(horace)\nforall x (Hyperopic(x) -> not Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Aquatic(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Hyperopic(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Phrenic(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) and not Mastered(x) -> Spiritless(x))\n\nAquatic(adora)\n\ntherefore Aquatic(adora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Salomon is grandiose. Cordy is clement. Betta is acoustic. If Cordy is syllabled and Cordy is grandiose then Cordy is acoustic. All syllabled things are not acoustic. White things are syllabled. If something is syllabled then it is clement. Red things are unconfined. If something is dural and not unconfined then it is ungroomed. Betta is not acoustic.", "logic": "\nGrandiose(salomon)\nClement(cordy)\nAcoustic(betta)\nSyllabled(cordy) and Grandiose(cordy) -> Acoustic(cordy)\nforall x (Syllabled(x) -> not Acoustic(x))\nforall x (Grandiose(x) -> Syllabled(x))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) -> Clement(x))\nforall x (Clement(x) -> Unconfined(x))\nforall x (Dural(x) and not Unconfined(x) -> Ungroomed(x))\n\nnot Acoustic(betta)\n\ntherefore Acoustic(betta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Kristian is unstirred. Johannes is cyprinid. Malissa is delayed. If Johannes is myotonic and Johannes is unstirred then Johannes is delayed. All myotonic things are not delayed. White things are myotonic. If something is myotonic then it is cyprinid. Red things are fairish. If something is mongol and not fairish then it is motile. Johannes is fairish.", "logic": "\nUnstirred(kristian)\nCyprinid(johannes)\nDelayed(malissa)\nMyotonic(johannes) and Unstirred(johannes) -> Delayed(johannes)\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> not Delayed(x))\nforall x (Unstirred(x) -> Myotonic(x))\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Mongol(x) and not Fairish(x) -> Motile(x))\n\nFairish(johannes)\n\nCyprinid(johannes) and forall x (Cyprinid(x) -> Fairish(x)) -> therefore Fairish(johannes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Amargo is rickety. Valina is heavy. Roxana is unverified. If Valina is roughdried and Valina is rickety then Valina is unverified. All roughdried things are not unverified. White things are roughdried. If something is roughdried then it is heavy. Red things are fictional. If something is unpolluted and not fictional then it is youngish. Amargo is not roughdried.", "logic": "\nRickety(amargo)\nHeavy(valina)\nUnverified(roxana)\nRoughdried(valina) and Rickety(valina) -> Unverified(valina)\nforall x (Roughdried(x) -> not Unverified(x))\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Roughdried(x) -> Heavy(x))\nforall x (Heavy(x) -> Fictional(x))\nforall x (Unpolluted(x) and not Fictional(x) -> Youngish(x))\n\nnot Roughdried(amargo)\n\nRickety(amargo) and forall x (Rickety(x) -> Roughdried(x)) -> therefore Roughdried(amargo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Giacomo is derivable. Farley is coagulable. Vasilis is anabolic. If Farley is yucky and Farley is derivable then Farley is anabolic. All yucky things are not anabolic. White things are yucky. If something is yucky then it is coagulable. Red things are covariant. If something is anionic and not covariant then it is immune. Giacomo is coagulable.", "logic": "\nDerivable(giacomo)\nCoagulable(farley)\nAnabolic(vasilis)\nYucky(farley) and Derivable(farley) -> Anabolic(farley)\nforall x (Yucky(x) -> not Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) -> Yucky(x))\nforall x (Yucky(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Anionic(x) and not Covariant(x) -> Immune(x))\n\nCoagulable(giacomo)\n\nDerivable(giacomo) and forall x (Derivable(x) -> Yucky(x)) -> therefore Yucky(giacomo) Yucky(giacomo) and forall x (Yucky(x) -> Coagulable(x)) -> therefore Coagulable(giacomo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Tisha is triassic. Emelda is curled. Flo is collinear. If Emelda is chafed and Emelda is triassic then Emelda is collinear. All chafed things are not collinear. White things are chafed. If something is chafed then it is curled. Red things are punished. If something is excited and not punished then it is truncate. Tisha is collinear.", "logic": "\nTriassic(tisha)\nCurled(emelda)\nCollinear(flo)\nChafed(emelda) and Triassic(emelda) -> Collinear(emelda)\nforall x (Chafed(x) -> not Collinear(x))\nforall x (Triassic(x) -> Chafed(x))\nforall x (Chafed(x) -> Curled(x))\nforall x (Curled(x) -> Punished(x))\nforall x (Excited(x) and not Punished(x) -> Truncate(x))\n\nCollinear(tisha)\n\nTriassic(tisha) and forall x (Triassic(x) -> Chafed(x)) -> therefore Chafed(tisha) Chafed(tisha) and forall x (Chafed(x) -> not Collinear(x)) -> therefore not Collinear(tisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Ronna is star. Nestor is uncaused. Traci is fledged. If Nestor is incomplete and Nestor is star then Nestor is fledged. All incomplete things are not fledged. White things are incomplete. If something is incomplete then it is uncaused. Red things are anoxemic. If something is granitic and not anoxemic then it is eightfold. Ronna is anoxemic.", "logic": "\nStar(ronna)\nUncaused(nestor)\nFledged(traci)\nIncomplete(nestor) and Star(nestor) -> Fledged(nestor)\nforall x (Incomplete(x) -> not Fledged(x))\nforall x (Star(x) -> Incomplete(x))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nforall x (Uncaused(x) -> Anoxemic(x))\nforall x (Granitic(x) and not Anoxemic(x) -> Eightfold(x))\n\nAnoxemic(ronna)\n\nStar(ronna) and forall x (Star(x) -> Incomplete(x)) -> therefore Incomplete(ronna) Incomplete(ronna) and forall x (Incomplete(x) -> Uncaused(x)) -> therefore Uncaused(ronna) Uncaused(ronna) and forall x (Uncaused(x) -> Anoxemic(x)) -> therefore Anoxemic(ronna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Wyn is demure. Noam is aphetic. Wandie is monoecious. If Noam is judaic and Noam is demure then Noam is monoecious. All judaic things are not monoecious. White things are judaic. If something is judaic then it is aphetic. Red things are pneumonic. If something is cuspidate and not pneumonic then it is plushy. Wyn is not pneumonic.", "logic": "\nDemure(wyn)\nAphetic(noam)\nMonoecious(wandie)\nJudaic(noam) and Demure(noam) -> Monoecious(noam)\nforall x (Judaic(x) -> not Monoecious(x))\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Judaic(x))\nforall x (Judaic(x) -> Aphetic(x))\nforall x (Aphetic(x) -> Pneumonic(x))\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) and not Pneumonic(x) -> Plushy(x))\n\nnot Pneumonic(wyn)\n\nDemure(wyn) and forall x (Demure(x) -> Judaic(x)) -> therefore Judaic(wyn) Judaic(wyn) and forall x (Judaic(x) -> Aphetic(x)) -> therefore Aphetic(wyn) Aphetic(wyn) and forall x (Aphetic(x) -> Pneumonic(x)) -> therefore Pneumonic(wyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Anny is annular. Kat is uremic. Randene is deepening. If Kat is bedewed and Kat is annular then Kat is deepening. All bedewed things are not deepening. White things are bedewed. If something is bedewed then it is uremic. Red things are leafy. If something is maintained and not leafy then it is gritty. Randene is not leafy.", "logic": "\nAnnular(anny)\nUremic(kat)\nDeepening(randene)\nBedewed(kat) and Annular(kat) -> Deepening(kat)\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> not Deepening(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Maintained(x) and not Leafy(x) -> Gritty(x))\n\nnot Leafy(randene)\n\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Leafy(x)) <- forall x (Bedewed(x) -> Uremic(x)) <- forall x (Annular(x) -> Bedewed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Maurits is figurative. Desdemona is curricular. Neysa is sick. If Desdemona is penumbral and Desdemona is figurative then Desdemona is sick. All penumbral things are not sick. White things are penumbral. If something is penumbral then it is curricular. Red things are upright. If something is tsarist and not upright then it is cityfied. Desdemona is penumbral.", "logic": "\nFigurative(maurits)\nCurricular(desdemona)\nSick(neysa)\nPenumbral(desdemona) and Figurative(desdemona) -> Sick(desdemona)\nforall x (Penumbral(x) -> not Sick(x))\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nforall x (Penumbral(x) -> Curricular(x))\nforall x (Curricular(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Tsarist(x) and not Upright(x) -> Cityfied(x))\n\nPenumbral(desdemona)\n\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Penumbral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Harlie is large. Nesta is gripping. Bevvy is isolated. If Nesta is sacculate and Nesta is large then Nesta is isolated. All sacculate things are not isolated. White things are sacculate. If something is sacculate then it is gripping. Red things are staggering. If something is sleeved and not staggering then it is slim. Bevvy is not gripping.", "logic": "\nLarge(harlie)\nGripping(nesta)\nIsolated(bevvy)\nSacculate(nesta) and Large(nesta) -> Isolated(nesta)\nforall x (Sacculate(x) -> not Isolated(x))\nforall x (Large(x) -> Sacculate(x))\nforall x (Sacculate(x) -> Gripping(x))\nforall x (Gripping(x) -> Staggering(x))\nforall x (Sleeved(x) and not Staggering(x) -> Slim(x))\n\nnot Gripping(bevvy)\n\nforall x (Sacculate(x) -> Gripping(x)) <- forall x (Large(x) -> Sacculate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Arturo is burred. Pam is toasted. Demetre is unburied. If Pam is rivalrous and Pam is burred then Pam is unburied. All rivalrous things are not unburied. White things are rivalrous. If something is rivalrous then it is toasted. Red things are moonless. If something is appetizing and not moonless then it is midway. Arturo is midway.", "logic": "\nBurred(arturo)\nToasted(pam)\nUnburied(demetre)\nRivalrous(pam) and Burred(pam) -> Unburied(pam)\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> not Unburied(x))\nforall x (Burred(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Toasted(x))\nforall x (Toasted(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and not Moonless(x) -> Midway(x))\n\nMidway(arturo)\n\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and not Moonless(x) -> Midway(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Steve is outrigged. Bria is rich. Bryon is musing. If Bria is encouraged and Bria is outrigged then Bria is musing. All encouraged things are not musing. White things are encouraged. If something is encouraged then it is rich. Red things are gaseous. If something is bellying and not gaseous then it is obligatory. Bria is not outrigged.", "logic": "\nOutrigged(steve)\nRich(bria)\nMusing(bryon)\nEncouraged(bria) and Outrigged(bria) -> Musing(bria)\nforall x (Encouraged(x) -> not Musing(x))\nforall x (Outrigged(x) -> Encouraged(x))\nforall x (Encouraged(x) -> Rich(x))\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Gaseous(x))\nforall x (Bellying(x) and not Gaseous(x) -> Obligatory(x))\n\nnot Outrigged(bria)\n\nnot Outrigged(bria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Esau is electric. Melly is hooklike. Benedetta is forcipate. If Melly is saintly and Melly is electric then Melly is forcipate. All saintly things are not forcipate. White things are saintly. If something is saintly then it is hooklike. Red things are malarial. If something is liberated and not malarial then it is scraggly. Benedetta is liberated.", "logic": "\nElectric(esau)\nHooklike(melly)\nForcipate(benedetta)\nSaintly(melly) and Electric(melly) -> Forcipate(melly)\nforall x (Saintly(x) -> not Forcipate(x))\nforall x (Electric(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Saintly(x) -> Hooklike(x))\nforall x (Hooklike(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) and not Malarial(x) -> Scraggly(x))\n\nLiberated(benedetta)\n\nLiberated(benedetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Caresse is vaporish. Inci is tonsorial. Calvin is healthy. If Inci is marvelous and Inci is vaporish then Inci is healthy. All marvelous things are not healthy. White things are marvelous. If something is marvelous then it is tonsorial. Red things are adaxial. If something is hellenic and not adaxial then it is worrisome. Inci is not hellenic.", "logic": "\nVaporish(caresse)\nTonsorial(inci)\nHealthy(calvin)\nMarvelous(inci) and Vaporish(inci) -> Healthy(inci)\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> not Healthy(x))\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Marvelous(x))\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> Tonsorial(x))\nforall x (Tonsorial(x) -> Adaxial(x))\nforall x (Hellenic(x) and not Adaxial(x) -> Worrisome(x))\n\nnot Hellenic(inci)\n\nnot Hellenic(inci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Tandi is parous. Wilek is biddable. Janet is fagged. If Wilek is fairish and Wilek is parous then Wilek is fagged. All fairish things are not fagged. White things are fairish. If something is fairish then it is biddable. Red things are exempt. If something is prewar and not exempt then it is slouchy. Tandi is prewar.", "logic": "\nParous(tandi)\nBiddable(wilek)\nFagged(janet)\nFairish(wilek) and Parous(wilek) -> Fagged(wilek)\nforall x (Fairish(x) -> not Fagged(x))\nforall x (Parous(x) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Fairish(x) -> Biddable(x))\nforall x (Biddable(x) -> Exempt(x))\nforall x (Prewar(x) and not Exempt(x) -> Slouchy(x))\n\nPrewar(tandi)\n\nPrewar(tandi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "The clarette mumble the les. The clarette is agrestic. The clarette is rhombic. The clarette asphyxiate the les. The clarette etherize the les. The les mumble the clarette. The les is agrestic. The les is rhombic. The les is halal. The les is verifying. The les asphyxiate the clarette. The les etherize the clarette. If something asphyxiate the les and it etherize the clarette then the clarette mumble the les. If something is agrestic then it is cuban. If something mumble the clarette and it asphyxiate the clarette then the clarette asphyxiate the les. If something is cuban and halal then it etherize the les. If something etherize the clarette then the clarette mumble the les. If something etherize the les then it mumble the les. The les asphyxiate the clarette.", "logic": "\nMumble(clarette, les)\nAgrestic(clarette)\nRhombic(clarette)\nAsphyxiate(clarette, les)\nEtherize(clarette, les)\nMumble(les, clarette)\nAgrestic(les)\nRhombic(les)\nHalal(les)\nVerifying(les)\nAsphyxiate(les, clarette)\nEtherize(les, clarette)\nforall x (Asphyxiate(x, les) and Etherize(x, clarette) -> Mumble(clarette, les))\nforall x (Agrestic(x) -> Cuban(x))\nforall x (Mumble(x, clarette) and Asphyxiate(x, clarette) -> Asphyxiate(clarette, les))\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Halal(x) -> Etherize(x, les))\nforall x (Etherize(x, clarette) -> Mumble(clarette, les))\nforall x (Etherize(x, les) -> Mumble(x, les))\n\nAsphyxiate(les, clarette)\n\ntherefore Asphyxiate(les, clarette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The ketty yack the walden. The ketty is largish. The ketty is turbinate. The ketty sandwich the walden. The ketty waft the walden. The walden yack the ketty. The walden is largish. The walden is turbinate. The walden is splendid. The walden is reformist. The walden sandwich the ketty. The walden waft the ketty. If something sandwich the walden and it waft the ketty then the ketty yack the walden. If something is largish then it is revolved. If something yack the ketty and it sandwich the ketty then the ketty sandwich the walden. If something is revolved and splendid then it waft the walden. If something waft the ketty then the ketty yack the walden. If something waft the walden then it yack the walden. The walden is not largish.", "logic": "\nYack(ketty, walden)\nLargish(ketty)\nTurbinate(ketty)\nSandwich(ketty, walden)\nWaft(ketty, walden)\nYack(walden, ketty)\nLargish(walden)\nTurbinate(walden)\nSplendid(walden)\nReformist(walden)\nSandwich(walden, ketty)\nWaft(walden, ketty)\nforall x (Sandwich(x, walden) and Waft(x, ketty) -> Yack(ketty, walden))\nforall x (Largish(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Yack(x, ketty) and Sandwich(x, ketty) -> Sandwich(ketty, walden))\nforall x (Revolved(x) and Splendid(x) -> Waft(x, walden))\nforall x (Waft(x, ketty) -> Yack(ketty, walden))\nforall x (Waft(x, walden) -> Yack(x, walden))\n\nnot Largish(walden)\n\ntherefore Largish(walden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The mayda funk the atlante. The mayda is lemony. The mayda is juicy. The mayda commend the atlante. The mayda detoxify the atlante. The atlante funk the mayda. The atlante is lemony. The atlante is juicy. The atlante is lxvii. The atlante is grassroots. The atlante commend the mayda. The atlante detoxify the mayda. If something commend the atlante and it detoxify the mayda then the mayda funk the atlante. If something is lemony then it is godless. If something funk the mayda and it commend the mayda then the mayda commend the atlante. If something is godless and lxvii then it detoxify the atlante. If something detoxify the mayda then the mayda funk the atlante. If something detoxify the atlante then it funk the atlante. The atlante is godless.", "logic": "\nFunk(mayda, atlante)\nLemony(mayda)\nJuicy(mayda)\nCommend(mayda, atlante)\nDetoxify(mayda, atlante)\nFunk(atlante, mayda)\nLemony(atlante)\nJuicy(atlante)\nLxvii(atlante)\nGrassroots(atlante)\nCommend(atlante, mayda)\nDetoxify(atlante, mayda)\nforall x (Commend(x, atlante) and Detoxify(x, mayda) -> Funk(mayda, atlante))\nforall x (Lemony(x) -> Godless(x))\nforall x (Funk(x, mayda) and Commend(x, mayda) -> Commend(mayda, atlante))\nforall x (Godless(x) and Lxvii(x) -> Detoxify(x, atlante))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, mayda) -> Funk(mayda, atlante))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, atlante) -> Funk(x, atlante))\n\nGodless(atlante)\n\nLemony(atlante) and forall x (Lemony(x) -> Godless(x)) -> therefore Godless(atlante)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The katrinka contend the carlie. The katrinka is doped. The katrinka is creedal. The katrinka aliment the carlie. The katrinka cackel the carlie. The carlie contend the katrinka. The carlie is doped. The carlie is creedal. The carlie is rumanian. The carlie is poltroon. The carlie aliment the katrinka. The carlie cackel the katrinka. If something aliment the carlie and it cackel the katrinka then the katrinka contend the carlie. If something is doped then it is burned. If something contend the katrinka and it aliment the katrinka then the katrinka aliment the carlie. If something is burned and rumanian then it cackel the carlie. If something cackel the katrinka then the katrinka contend the carlie. If something cackel the carlie then it contend the carlie. The katrinka is not burned.", "logic": "\nContend(katrinka, carlie)\nDoped(katrinka)\nCreedal(katrinka)\nAliment(katrinka, carlie)\nCackel(katrinka, carlie)\nContend(carlie, katrinka)\nDoped(carlie)\nCreedal(carlie)\nRumanian(carlie)\nPoltroon(carlie)\nAliment(carlie, katrinka)\nCackel(carlie, katrinka)\nforall x (Aliment(x, carlie) and Cackel(x, katrinka) -> Contend(katrinka, carlie))\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Burned(x))\nforall x (Contend(x, katrinka) and Aliment(x, katrinka) -> Aliment(katrinka, carlie))\nforall x (Burned(x) and Rumanian(x) -> Cackel(x, carlie))\nforall x (Cackel(x, katrinka) -> Contend(katrinka, carlie))\nforall x (Cackel(x, carlie) -> Contend(x, carlie))\n\nnot Burned(katrinka)\n\nDoped(katrinka) and forall x (Doped(x) -> Burned(x)) -> therefore Burned(katrinka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The farrah rededicate the harriott. The farrah is dire. The farrah is patched. The farrah bestialise the harriott. The farrah gown the harriott. The harriott rededicate the farrah. The harriott is dire. The harriott is patched. The harriott is fruity. The harriott is canonic. The harriott bestialise the farrah. The harriott gown the farrah. If something bestialise the harriott and it gown the farrah then the farrah rededicate the harriott. If something is dire then it is utilizable. If something rededicate the farrah and it bestialise the farrah then the farrah bestialise the harriott. If something is utilizable and fruity then it gown the harriott. If something gown the farrah then the farrah rededicate the harriott. If something gown the harriott then it rededicate the harriott. The harriott gown the harriott.", "logic": "\nRededicate(farrah, harriott)\nDire(farrah)\nPatched(farrah)\nBestialise(farrah, harriott)\nGown(farrah, harriott)\nRededicate(harriott, farrah)\nDire(harriott)\nPatched(harriott)\nFruity(harriott)\nCanonic(harriott)\nBestialise(harriott, farrah)\nGown(harriott, farrah)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, harriott) and Gown(x, farrah) -> Rededicate(farrah, harriott))\nforall x (Dire(x) -> Utilizable(x))\nforall x (Rededicate(x, farrah) and Bestialise(x, farrah) -> Bestialise(farrah, harriott))\nforall x (Utilizable(x) and Fruity(x) -> Gown(x, harriott))\nforall x (Gown(x, farrah) -> Rededicate(farrah, harriott))\nforall x (Gown(x, harriott) -> Rededicate(x, harriott))\n\nGown(harriott, harriott)\n\nDire(harriott) and forall x (Dire(x) -> Utilizable(x)) -> therefore Utilizable(harriott) Utilizable(harriott) and Fruity(harriott) and forall x (Utilizable(x) and Fruity(x) -> Gown(x, harriott)) -> therefore Gown(harriott, harriott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The annaliese housebreak the barde. The annaliese is seeping. The annaliese is reeking. The annaliese cool the barde. The annaliese vanish the barde. The barde housebreak the annaliese. The barde is seeping. The barde is reeking. The barde is excellent. The barde is unratable. The barde cool the annaliese. The barde vanish the annaliese. If something cool the barde and it vanish the annaliese then the annaliese housebreak the barde. If something is seeping then it is aboulic. If something housebreak the annaliese and it cool the annaliese then the annaliese cool the barde. If something is aboulic and excellent then it vanish the barde. If something vanish the annaliese then the annaliese housebreak the barde. If something vanish the barde then it housebreak the barde. The barde does not need the barde.", "logic": "\nHousebreak(annaliese, barde)\nSeeping(annaliese)\nReeking(annaliese)\nCool(annaliese, barde)\nVanish(annaliese, barde)\nHousebreak(barde, annaliese)\nSeeping(barde)\nReeking(barde)\nExcellent(barde)\nUnratable(barde)\nCool(barde, annaliese)\nVanish(barde, annaliese)\nforall x (Cool(x, barde) and Vanish(x, annaliese) -> Housebreak(annaliese, barde))\nforall x (Seeping(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, annaliese) and Cool(x, annaliese) -> Cool(annaliese, barde))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) and Excellent(x) -> Vanish(x, barde))\nforall x (Vanish(x, annaliese) -> Housebreak(annaliese, barde))\nforall x (Vanish(x, barde) -> Housebreak(x, barde))\n\nnot Vanish(barde, barde)\n\nSeeping(barde) and forall x (Seeping(x) -> Aboulic(x)) -> therefore Aboulic(barde) Aboulic(barde) and Excellent(barde) and forall x (Aboulic(x) and Excellent(x) -> Vanish(x, barde)) -> therefore Vanish(barde, barde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The eddi meow the barbie. The eddi is unthankful. The eddi is whispered. The eddi bump the barbie. The eddi french the barbie. The barbie meow the eddi. The barbie is unthankful. The barbie is whispered. The barbie is roughish. The barbie is eventful. The barbie bump the eddi. The barbie french the eddi. If something bump the barbie and it french the eddi then the eddi meow the barbie. If something is unthankful then it is omissive. If something meow the eddi and it bump the eddi then the eddi bump the barbie. If something is omissive and roughish then it french the barbie. If something french the eddi then the eddi meow the barbie. If something french the barbie then it meow the barbie. The barbie meow the barbie.", "logic": "\nMeow(eddi, barbie)\nUnthankful(eddi)\nWhispered(eddi)\nBump(eddi, barbie)\nFrench(eddi, barbie)\nMeow(barbie, eddi)\nUnthankful(barbie)\nWhispered(barbie)\nRoughish(barbie)\nEventful(barbie)\nBump(barbie, eddi)\nFrench(barbie, eddi)\nforall x (Bump(x, barbie) and French(x, eddi) -> Meow(eddi, barbie))\nforall x (Unthankful(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Meow(x, eddi) and Bump(x, eddi) -> Bump(eddi, barbie))\nforall x (Omissive(x) and Roughish(x) -> French(x, barbie))\nforall x (French(x, eddi) -> Meow(eddi, barbie))\nforall x (French(x, barbie) -> Meow(x, barbie))\n\nMeow(barbie, barbie)\n\nUnthankful(barbie) and forall x (Unthankful(x) -> Omissive(x)) -> therefore Omissive(barbie) Omissive(barbie) and Roughish(barbie) and forall x (Omissive(x) and Roughish(x) -> French(x, barbie)) -> therefore French(barbie, barbie) French(barbie, barbie) and forall x (French(x, barbie) -> Meow(x, barbie)) -> therefore Meow(barbie, barbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The rosalinda scaffold the vanya. The rosalinda is scheduled. The rosalinda is germicidal. The rosalinda niggle the vanya. The rosalinda blaspheme the vanya. The vanya scaffold the rosalinda. The vanya is scheduled. The vanya is germicidal. The vanya is assumptive. The vanya is unendowed. The vanya niggle the rosalinda. The vanya blaspheme the rosalinda. If something niggle the vanya and it blaspheme the rosalinda then the rosalinda scaffold the vanya. If something is scheduled then it is spiritous. If something scaffold the rosalinda and it niggle the rosalinda then the rosalinda niggle the vanya. If something is spiritous and assumptive then it blaspheme the vanya. If something blaspheme the rosalinda then the rosalinda scaffold the vanya. If something blaspheme the vanya then it scaffold the vanya. The vanya does not chase the vanya.", "logic": "\nScaffold(rosalinda, vanya)\nScheduled(rosalinda)\nGermicidal(rosalinda)\nNiggle(rosalinda, vanya)\nBlaspheme(rosalinda, vanya)\nScaffold(vanya, rosalinda)\nScheduled(vanya)\nGermicidal(vanya)\nAssumptive(vanya)\nUnendowed(vanya)\nNiggle(vanya, rosalinda)\nBlaspheme(vanya, rosalinda)\nforall x (Niggle(x, vanya) and Blaspheme(x, rosalinda) -> Scaffold(rosalinda, vanya))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nforall x (Scaffold(x, rosalinda) and Niggle(x, rosalinda) -> Niggle(rosalinda, vanya))\nforall x (Spiritous(x) and Assumptive(x) -> Blaspheme(x, vanya))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, rosalinda) -> Scaffold(rosalinda, vanya))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, vanya) -> Scaffold(x, vanya))\n\nnot Scaffold(vanya, vanya)\n\nScheduled(vanya) and forall x (Scheduled(x) -> Spiritous(x)) -> therefore Spiritous(vanya) Spiritous(vanya) and Assumptive(vanya) and forall x (Spiritous(x) and Assumptive(x) -> Blaspheme(x, vanya)) -> therefore Blaspheme(vanya, vanya) Blaspheme(vanya, vanya) and forall x (Blaspheme(x, vanya) -> Scaffold(x, vanya)) -> therefore Scaffold(vanya, vanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The amory agnize the herculie. The amory is eligible. The amory is wormlike. The amory unlade the herculie. The amory frolic the herculie. The herculie agnize the amory. The herculie is eligible. The herculie is wormlike. The herculie is riddled. The herculie is brimful. The herculie unlade the amory. The herculie frolic the amory. If something unlade the herculie and it frolic the amory then the amory agnize the herculie. If something is eligible then it is ashamed. If something agnize the amory and it unlade the amory then the amory unlade the herculie. If something is ashamed and riddled then it frolic the herculie. If something frolic the amory then the amory agnize the herculie. If something frolic the herculie then it agnize the herculie. The amory does not like the amory.", "logic": "\nAgnize(amory, herculie)\nEligible(amory)\nWormlike(amory)\nUnlade(amory, herculie)\nFrolic(amory, herculie)\nAgnize(herculie, amory)\nEligible(herculie)\nWormlike(herculie)\nRiddled(herculie)\nBrimful(herculie)\nUnlade(herculie, amory)\nFrolic(herculie, amory)\nforall x (Unlade(x, herculie) and Frolic(x, amory) -> Agnize(amory, herculie))\nforall x (Eligible(x) -> Ashamed(x))\nforall x (Agnize(x, amory) and Unlade(x, amory) -> Unlade(amory, herculie))\nforall x (Ashamed(x) and Riddled(x) -> Frolic(x, herculie))\nforall x (Frolic(x, amory) -> Agnize(amory, herculie))\nforall x (Frolic(x, herculie) -> Agnize(x, herculie))\n\nnot Unlade(amory, amory)\n\nnot Unlade(amory, amory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The jaclin exercise the jefferson. The jaclin is acetylic. The jaclin is mouselike. The jaclin unbridle the jefferson. The jaclin trammel the jefferson. The jefferson exercise the jaclin. The jefferson is acetylic. The jefferson is mouselike. The jefferson is concealing. The jefferson is unsought. The jefferson unbridle the jaclin. The jefferson trammel the jaclin. If something unbridle the jefferson and it trammel the jaclin then the jaclin exercise the jefferson. If something is acetylic then it is inchoative. If something exercise the jaclin and it unbridle the jaclin then the jaclin unbridle the jefferson. If something is inchoative and concealing then it trammel the jefferson. If something trammel the jaclin then the jaclin exercise the jefferson. If something trammel the jefferson then it exercise the jefferson. The jaclin trammel the jaclin.", "logic": "\nExercise(jaclin, jefferson)\nAcetylic(jaclin)\nMouselike(jaclin)\nUnbridle(jaclin, jefferson)\nTrammel(jaclin, jefferson)\nExercise(jefferson, jaclin)\nAcetylic(jefferson)\nMouselike(jefferson)\nConcealing(jefferson)\nUnsought(jefferson)\nUnbridle(jefferson, jaclin)\nTrammel(jefferson, jaclin)\nforall x (Unbridle(x, jefferson) and Trammel(x, jaclin) -> Exercise(jaclin, jefferson))\nforall x (Acetylic(x) -> Inchoative(x))\nforall x (Exercise(x, jaclin) and Unbridle(x, jaclin) -> Unbridle(jaclin, jefferson))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) and Concealing(x) -> Trammel(x, jefferson))\nforall x (Trammel(x, jaclin) -> Exercise(jaclin, jefferson))\nforall x (Trammel(x, jefferson) -> Exercise(x, jefferson))\n\nTrammel(jaclin, jaclin)\n\nTrammel(jaclin, jaclin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The lanita expatiate the darrick. The lanita is lubricious. The lanita is bubbling. The lanita squeegee the darrick. The lanita reappear the darrick. The darrick expatiate the lanita. The darrick is lubricious. The darrick is bubbling. The darrick is functional. The darrick is pacific. The darrick squeegee the lanita. The darrick reappear the lanita. If something squeegee the darrick and it reappear the lanita then the lanita expatiate the darrick. If something is lubricious then it is glorious. If something expatiate the lanita and it squeegee the lanita then the lanita squeegee the darrick. If something is glorious and functional then it reappear the darrick. If something reappear the lanita then the lanita expatiate the darrick. If something reappear the darrick then it expatiate the darrick. The lanita does not chase the lanita.", "logic": "\nExpatiate(lanita, darrick)\nLubricious(lanita)\nBubbling(lanita)\nSqueegee(lanita, darrick)\nReappear(lanita, darrick)\nExpatiate(darrick, lanita)\nLubricious(darrick)\nBubbling(darrick)\nFunctional(darrick)\nPacific(darrick)\nSqueegee(darrick, lanita)\nReappear(darrick, lanita)\nforall x (Squeegee(x, darrick) and Reappear(x, lanita) -> Expatiate(lanita, darrick))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Expatiate(x, lanita) and Squeegee(x, lanita) -> Squeegee(lanita, darrick))\nforall x (Glorious(x) and Functional(x) -> Reappear(x, darrick))\nforall x (Reappear(x, lanita) -> Expatiate(lanita, darrick))\nforall x (Reappear(x, darrick) -> Expatiate(x, darrick))\n\nnot Expatiate(lanita, lanita)\n\nnot Expatiate(lanita, lanita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The carlotta spar the beverie. The carlotta is pious. The carlotta is beggarly. The carlotta partner the beverie. The carlotta yell the beverie. The beverie spar the carlotta. The beverie is pious. The beverie is beggarly. The beverie is denudate. The beverie is elliptic. The beverie partner the carlotta. The beverie yell the carlotta. If something partner the beverie and it yell the carlotta then the carlotta spar the beverie. If something is pious then it is uremic. If something spar the carlotta and it partner the carlotta then the carlotta partner the beverie. If something is uremic and denudate then it yell the beverie. If something yell the carlotta then the carlotta spar the beverie. If something yell the beverie then it spar the beverie. The carlotta is denudate.", "logic": "\nSpar(carlotta, beverie)\nPious(carlotta)\nBeggarly(carlotta)\nPartner(carlotta, beverie)\nYell(carlotta, beverie)\nSpar(beverie, carlotta)\nPious(beverie)\nBeggarly(beverie)\nDenudate(beverie)\nElliptic(beverie)\nPartner(beverie, carlotta)\nYell(beverie, carlotta)\nforall x (Partner(x, beverie) and Yell(x, carlotta) -> Spar(carlotta, beverie))\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Spar(x, carlotta) and Partner(x, carlotta) -> Partner(carlotta, beverie))\nforall x (Uremic(x) and Denudate(x) -> Yell(x, beverie))\nforall x (Yell(x, carlotta) -> Spar(carlotta, beverie))\nforall x (Yell(x, beverie) -> Spar(x, beverie))\n\nDenudate(carlotta)\n\nDenudate(carlotta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The niven topdress the joli. The niven is wavering. The niven is smutty. The niven action the joli. The niven enquire the joli. The joli topdress the niven. The joli is wavering. The joli is smutty. The joli is arsenious. The joli is vendible. The joli action the niven. The joli enquire the niven. If something action the joli and it enquire the niven then the niven topdress the joli. If something is wavering then it is unchaste. If something topdress the niven and it action the niven then the niven action the joli. If something is unchaste and arsenious then it enquire the joli. If something enquire the niven then the niven topdress the joli. If something enquire the joli then it topdress the joli. The joli does not like the joli.", "logic": "\nTopdress(niven, joli)\nWavering(niven)\nSmutty(niven)\nAction(niven, joli)\nEnquire(niven, joli)\nTopdress(joli, niven)\nWavering(joli)\nSmutty(joli)\nArsenious(joli)\nVendible(joli)\nAction(joli, niven)\nEnquire(joli, niven)\nforall x (Action(x, joli) and Enquire(x, niven) -> Topdress(niven, joli))\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Topdress(x, niven) and Action(x, niven) -> Action(niven, joli))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Arsenious(x) -> Enquire(x, joli))\nforall x (Enquire(x, niven) -> Topdress(niven, joli))\nforall x (Enquire(x, joli) -> Topdress(x, joli))\n\nnot Action(joli, joli)\n\nnot Action(joli, joli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The adela bleed the sacha. The adela is rapt. The adela is churchly. The adela dote the sacha. The adela wager the sacha. The sacha bleed the adela. The sacha is rapt. The sacha is churchly. The sacha is roumanian. The sacha is abdominous. The sacha dote the adela. The sacha wager the adela. If something dote the sacha and it wager the adela then the adela bleed the sacha. If something is rapt then it is cubelike. If something bleed the adela and it dote the adela then the adela dote the sacha. If something is cubelike and roumanian then it wager the sacha. If something wager the adela then the adela bleed the sacha. If something wager the sacha then it bleed the sacha. The adela is abdominous.", "logic": "\nBleed(adela, sacha)\nRapt(adela)\nChurchly(adela)\nDote(adela, sacha)\nWager(adela, sacha)\nBleed(sacha, adela)\nRapt(sacha)\nChurchly(sacha)\nRoumanian(sacha)\nAbdominous(sacha)\nDote(sacha, adela)\nWager(sacha, adela)\nforall x (Dote(x, sacha) and Wager(x, adela) -> Bleed(adela, sacha))\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Bleed(x, adela) and Dote(x, adela) -> Dote(adela, sacha))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) and Roumanian(x) -> Wager(x, sacha))\nforall x (Wager(x, adela) -> Bleed(adela, sacha))\nforall x (Wager(x, sacha) -> Bleed(x, sacha))\n\nAbdominous(adela)\n\nAbdominous(adela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The flossy is arterial. The flossy vacate the michail. The michail vacate the flossy. The michail reassure the jamima. The jamima is bronchial. The jamima vacate the michail. The jamima odorize the flossy. If something odorize the jamima then the jamima does not visit the michail. If something vacate the flossy then the flossy is arterial. If something reassure the michail then it is capsulate. If something reassure the jamima then the jamima reassure the flossy. If something is capsulate then it vacate the michail. If the jamima reassure the flossy then the flossy reassure the michail. If something reassure the jamima then it vacate the flossy. If something reassure the flossy then it does not visit the michail. The michail reassure the jamima.", "logic": "\nArterial(flossy)\nVacate(flossy, michail)\nVacate(michail, flossy)\nReassure(michail, jamima)\nBronchial(jamima)\nVacate(jamima, michail)\nOdorize(jamima, flossy)\nforall x (Odorize(x, jamima) -> not Reassure(jamima, michail))\nforall x (Vacate(x, flossy) -> Arterial(flossy))\nforall x (Reassure(x, michail) -> Capsulate(x))\nforall x (Reassure(x, jamima) -> Reassure(jamima, flossy))\nforall x (Capsulate(x) -> Vacate(x, michail))\nReassure(jamima, flossy) -> Reassure(flossy, michail)\nforall x (Reassure(x, jamima) -> Vacate(x, flossy))\nforall x (Reassure(x, flossy) -> not Reassure(x, michail))\n\nReassure(michail, jamima)\n\ntherefore Reassure(michail, jamima)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The johnnie is fiery. The johnnie brown the matt. The matt brown the johnnie. The matt jitterbug the phylis. The phylis is radical. The phylis brown the matt. The phylis whisper the johnnie. If something whisper the phylis then the phylis does not visit the matt. If something brown the johnnie then the johnnie is fiery. If something jitterbug the matt then it is difficult. If something jitterbug the phylis then the phylis jitterbug the johnnie. If something is difficult then it brown the matt. If the phylis jitterbug the johnnie then the johnnie jitterbug the matt. If something jitterbug the phylis then it brown the johnnie. If something jitterbug the johnnie then it does not visit the matt. The phylis does not see the johnnie.", "logic": "\nFiery(johnnie)\nBrown(johnnie, matt)\nBrown(matt, johnnie)\nJitterbug(matt, phylis)\nRadical(phylis)\nBrown(phylis, matt)\nWhisper(phylis, johnnie)\nforall x (Whisper(x, phylis) -> not Jitterbug(phylis, matt))\nforall x (Brown(x, johnnie) -> Fiery(johnnie))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, matt) -> Difficult(x))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, phylis) -> Jitterbug(phylis, johnnie))\nforall x (Difficult(x) -> Brown(x, matt))\nJitterbug(phylis, johnnie) -> Jitterbug(johnnie, matt)\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, phylis) -> Brown(x, johnnie))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, johnnie) -> not Jitterbug(x, matt))\n\nnot Whisper(phylis, johnnie)\n\ntherefore Whisper(phylis, johnnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The cameo is cordial. The cameo pressure the ignazio. The ignazio pressure the cameo. The ignazio eruct the easter. The easter is anoxic. The easter pressure the ignazio. The easter crunch the cameo. If something crunch the easter then the easter does not visit the ignazio. If something pressure the cameo then the cameo is cordial. If something eruct the ignazio then it is xxviii. If something eruct the easter then the easter eruct the cameo. If something is xxviii then it pressure the ignazio. If the easter eruct the cameo then the cameo eruct the ignazio. If something eruct the easter then it pressure the cameo. If something eruct the cameo then it does not visit the ignazio. The easter eruct the cameo.", "logic": "\nCordial(cameo)\nPressure(cameo, ignazio)\nPressure(ignazio, cameo)\nEruct(ignazio, easter)\nAnoxic(easter)\nPressure(easter, ignazio)\nCrunch(easter, cameo)\nforall x (Crunch(x, easter) -> not Eruct(easter, ignazio))\nforall x (Pressure(x, cameo) -> Cordial(cameo))\nforall x (Eruct(x, ignazio) -> Xxviii(x))\nforall x (Eruct(x, easter) -> Eruct(easter, cameo))\nforall x (Xxviii(x) -> Pressure(x, ignazio))\nEruct(easter, cameo) -> Eruct(cameo, ignazio)\nforall x (Eruct(x, easter) -> Pressure(x, cameo))\nforall x (Eruct(x, cameo) -> not Eruct(x, ignazio))\n\nEruct(easter, cameo)\n\nEruct(ignazio, easter) and forall x (Eruct(x, easter) -> Eruct(easter, cameo)) -> therefore Eruct(easter, cameo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The jacquelyn is tedious. The jacquelyn pull the almira. The almira pull the jacquelyn. The almira hawk the sherwood. The sherwood is muted. The sherwood pull the almira. The sherwood imperil the jacquelyn. If something imperil the sherwood then the sherwood does not visit the almira. If something pull the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn is tedious. If something hawk the almira then it is uncommon. If something hawk the sherwood then the sherwood hawk the jacquelyn. If something is uncommon then it pull the almira. If the sherwood hawk the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn hawk the almira. If something hawk the sherwood then it pull the jacquelyn. If something hawk the jacquelyn then it does not visit the almira. The sherwood does not visit the jacquelyn.", "logic": "\nTedious(jacquelyn)\nPull(jacquelyn, almira)\nPull(almira, jacquelyn)\nHawk(almira, sherwood)\nMuted(sherwood)\nPull(sherwood, almira)\nImperil(sherwood, jacquelyn)\nforall x (Imperil(x, sherwood) -> not Hawk(sherwood, almira))\nforall x (Pull(x, jacquelyn) -> Tedious(jacquelyn))\nforall x (Hawk(x, almira) -> Uncommon(x))\nforall x (Hawk(x, sherwood) -> Hawk(sherwood, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) -> Pull(x, almira))\nHawk(sherwood, jacquelyn) -> Hawk(jacquelyn, almira)\nforall x (Hawk(x, sherwood) -> Pull(x, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Hawk(x, jacquelyn) -> not Hawk(x, almira))\n\nnot Hawk(sherwood, jacquelyn)\n\nHawk(almira, sherwood) and forall x (Hawk(x, sherwood) -> Hawk(sherwood, jacquelyn)) -> therefore Hawk(sherwood, jacquelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The ilysa is largo. The ilysa wail the dulcinea. The dulcinea wail the ilysa. The dulcinea slat the olia. The olia is striking. The olia wail the dulcinea. The olia taste the ilysa. If something taste the olia then the olia does not visit the dulcinea. If something wail the ilysa then the ilysa is largo. If something slat the dulcinea then it is dovish. If something slat the olia then the olia slat the ilysa. If something is dovish then it wail the dulcinea. If the olia slat the ilysa then the ilysa slat the dulcinea. If something slat the olia then it wail the ilysa. If something slat the ilysa then it does not visit the dulcinea. The ilysa slat the dulcinea.", "logic": "\nLargo(ilysa)\nWail(ilysa, dulcinea)\nWail(dulcinea, ilysa)\nSlat(dulcinea, olia)\nStriking(olia)\nWail(olia, dulcinea)\nTaste(olia, ilysa)\nforall x (Taste(x, olia) -> not Slat(olia, dulcinea))\nforall x (Wail(x, ilysa) -> Largo(ilysa))\nforall x (Slat(x, dulcinea) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Slat(x, olia) -> Slat(olia, ilysa))\nforall x (Dovish(x) -> Wail(x, dulcinea))\nSlat(olia, ilysa) -> Slat(ilysa, dulcinea)\nforall x (Slat(x, olia) -> Wail(x, ilysa))\nforall x (Slat(x, ilysa) -> not Slat(x, dulcinea))\n\nSlat(ilysa, dulcinea)\n\nSlat(dulcinea, olia) and forall x (Slat(x, olia) -> Slat(olia, ilysa)) -> therefore Slat(olia, ilysa) Slat(olia, ilysa) and Slat(olia, ilysa) -> Slat(ilysa, dulcinea) -> therefore Slat(ilysa, dulcinea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The cicily is cute. The cicily misbelieve the roselyn. The roselyn misbelieve the cicily. The roselyn revitalise the lindsy. The lindsy is loquacious. The lindsy misbelieve the roselyn. The lindsy culminate the cicily. If something culminate the lindsy then the lindsy does not visit the roselyn. If something misbelieve the cicily then the cicily is cute. If something revitalise the roselyn then it is concordant. If something revitalise the lindsy then the lindsy revitalise the cicily. If something is concordant then it misbelieve the roselyn. If the lindsy revitalise the cicily then the cicily revitalise the roselyn. If something revitalise the lindsy then it misbelieve the cicily. If something revitalise the cicily then it does not visit the roselyn. The cicily does not visit the roselyn.", "logic": "\nCute(cicily)\nMisbelieve(cicily, roselyn)\nMisbelieve(roselyn, cicily)\nRevitalise(roselyn, lindsy)\nLoquacious(lindsy)\nMisbelieve(lindsy, roselyn)\nCulminate(lindsy, cicily)\nforall x (Culminate(x, lindsy) -> not Revitalise(lindsy, roselyn))\nforall x (Misbelieve(x, cicily) -> Cute(cicily))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, roselyn) -> Concordant(x))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, lindsy) -> Revitalise(lindsy, cicily))\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Misbelieve(x, roselyn))\nRevitalise(lindsy, cicily) -> Revitalise(cicily, roselyn)\nforall x (Revitalise(x, lindsy) -> Misbelieve(x, cicily))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, cicily) -> not Revitalise(x, roselyn))\n\nnot Revitalise(cicily, roselyn)\n\nRevitalise(roselyn, lindsy) and forall x (Revitalise(x, lindsy) -> Revitalise(lindsy, cicily)) -> therefore Revitalise(lindsy, cicily) Revitalise(lindsy, cicily) and Revitalise(lindsy, cicily) -> Revitalise(cicily, roselyn) -> therefore Revitalise(cicily, roselyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The laurette is palatable. The laurette ambition the vail. The vail ambition the laurette. The vail swab the jerome. The jerome is healthful. The jerome ambition the vail. The jerome blink the laurette. If something blink the jerome then the jerome does not visit the vail. If something ambition the laurette then the laurette is palatable. If something swab the vail then it is unquotable. If something swab the jerome then the jerome swab the laurette. If something is unquotable then it ambition the vail. If the jerome swab the laurette then the laurette swab the vail. If something swab the jerome then it ambition the laurette. If something swab the laurette then it does not visit the vail. The laurette is unquotable.", "logic": "\nPalatable(laurette)\nAmbition(laurette, vail)\nAmbition(vail, laurette)\nSwab(vail, jerome)\nHealthful(jerome)\nAmbition(jerome, vail)\nBlink(jerome, laurette)\nforall x (Blink(x, jerome) -> not Swab(jerome, vail))\nforall x (Ambition(x, laurette) -> Palatable(laurette))\nforall x (Swab(x, vail) -> Unquotable(x))\nforall x (Swab(x, jerome) -> Swab(jerome, laurette))\nforall x (Unquotable(x) -> Ambition(x, vail))\nSwab(jerome, laurette) -> Swab(laurette, vail)\nforall x (Swab(x, jerome) -> Ambition(x, laurette))\nforall x (Swab(x, laurette) -> not Swab(x, vail))\n\nUnquotable(laurette)\n\nSwab(vail, jerome) and forall x (Swab(x, jerome) -> Swab(jerome, laurette)) -> therefore Swab(jerome, laurette) Swab(jerome, laurette) and Swab(jerome, laurette) -> Swab(laurette, vail) -> therefore Swab(laurette, vail) Swab(laurette, vail) and forall x (Swab(x, vail) -> Unquotable(x)) -> therefore Unquotable(laurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The everett is cyprinid. The everett grace the elroy. The elroy grace the everett. The elroy skew the flory. The flory is fatal. The flory grace the elroy. The flory inculpate the everett. If something inculpate the flory then the flory does not visit the elroy. If something grace the everett then the everett is cyprinid. If something skew the elroy then it is weird. If something skew the flory then the flory skew the everett. If something is weird then it grace the elroy. If the flory skew the everett then the everett skew the elroy. If something skew the flory then it grace the everett. If something skew the everett then it does not visit the elroy. The everett is not weird.", "logic": "\nCyprinid(everett)\nGrace(everett, elroy)\nGrace(elroy, everett)\nSkew(elroy, flory)\nFatal(flory)\nGrace(flory, elroy)\nInculpate(flory, everett)\nforall x (Inculpate(x, flory) -> not Skew(flory, elroy))\nforall x (Grace(x, everett) -> Cyprinid(everett))\nforall x (Skew(x, elroy) -> Weird(x))\nforall x (Skew(x, flory) -> Skew(flory, everett))\nforall x (Weird(x) -> Grace(x, elroy))\nSkew(flory, everett) -> Skew(everett, elroy)\nforall x (Skew(x, flory) -> Grace(x, everett))\nforall x (Skew(x, everett) -> not Skew(x, elroy))\n\nnot Weird(everett)\n\nSkew(elroy, flory) and forall x (Skew(x, flory) -> Skew(flory, everett)) -> therefore Skew(flory, everett) Skew(flory, everett) and Skew(flory, everett) -> Skew(everett, elroy) -> therefore Skew(everett, elroy) Skew(everett, elroy) and forall x (Skew(x, elroy) -> Weird(x)) -> therefore Weird(everett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The jeana is ruined. The jeana weed the nola. The nola weed the jeana. The nola uplift the greggory. The greggory is voluminous. The greggory weed the nola. The greggory squat the jeana. If something squat the greggory then the greggory does not visit the nola. If something weed the jeana then the jeana is ruined. If something uplift the nola then it is inclement. If something uplift the greggory then the greggory uplift the jeana. If something is inclement then it weed the nola. If the greggory uplift the jeana then the jeana uplift the nola. If something uplift the greggory then it weed the jeana. If something uplift the jeana then it does not visit the nola. The nola does not need the nola.", "logic": "\nRuined(jeana)\nWeed(jeana, nola)\nWeed(nola, jeana)\nUplift(nola, greggory)\nVoluminous(greggory)\nWeed(greggory, nola)\nSquat(greggory, jeana)\nforall x (Squat(x, greggory) -> not Uplift(greggory, nola))\nforall x (Weed(x, jeana) -> Ruined(jeana))\nforall x (Uplift(x, nola) -> Inclement(x))\nforall x (Uplift(x, greggory) -> Uplift(greggory, jeana))\nforall x (Inclement(x) -> Weed(x, nola))\nUplift(greggory, jeana) -> Uplift(jeana, nola)\nforall x (Uplift(x, greggory) -> Weed(x, jeana))\nforall x (Uplift(x, jeana) -> not Uplift(x, nola))\n\nnot Weed(nola, nola)\n\nforall x (Inclement(x) -> Weed(x, nola)) <- forall x (Uplift(x, nola) -> Inclement(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The ara is principal. The ara help the rozamond. The rozamond help the ara. The rozamond criticize the peyton. The peyton is plush. The peyton help the rozamond. The peyton scratch the ara. If something scratch the peyton then the peyton does not visit the rozamond. If something help the ara then the ara is principal. If something criticize the rozamond then it is cheeselike. If something criticize the peyton then the peyton criticize the ara. If something is cheeselike then it help the rozamond. If the peyton criticize the ara then the ara criticize the rozamond. If something criticize the peyton then it help the ara. If something criticize the ara then it does not visit the rozamond. The peyton help the ara.", "logic": "\nPrincipal(ara)\nHelp(ara, rozamond)\nHelp(rozamond, ara)\nCriticize(rozamond, peyton)\nPlush(peyton)\nHelp(peyton, rozamond)\nScratch(peyton, ara)\nforall x (Scratch(x, peyton) -> not Criticize(peyton, rozamond))\nforall x (Help(x, ara) -> Principal(ara))\nforall x (Criticize(x, rozamond) -> Cheeselike(x))\nforall x (Criticize(x, peyton) -> Criticize(peyton, ara))\nforall x (Cheeselike(x) -> Help(x, rozamond))\nCriticize(peyton, ara) -> Criticize(ara, rozamond)\nforall x (Criticize(x, peyton) -> Help(x, ara))\nforall x (Criticize(x, ara) -> not Criticize(x, rozamond))\n\nHelp(peyton, ara)\n\nforall x (Criticize(x, peyton) -> Help(x, ara)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The andriette is hardfisted. The andriette predecease the isadora. The isadora predecease the andriette. The isadora valuate the danice. The danice is fattening. The danice predecease the isadora. The danice ossify the andriette. If something ossify the danice then the danice does not visit the isadora. If something predecease the andriette then the andriette is hardfisted. If something valuate the isadora then it is sanative. If something valuate the danice then the danice valuate the andriette. If something is sanative then it predecease the isadora. If the danice valuate the andriette then the andriette valuate the isadora. If something valuate the danice then it predecease the andriette. If something valuate the andriette then it does not visit the isadora. The isadora is not sanative.", "logic": "\nHardfisted(andriette)\nPredecease(andriette, isadora)\nPredecease(isadora, andriette)\nValuate(isadora, danice)\nFattening(danice)\nPredecease(danice, isadora)\nOssify(danice, andriette)\nforall x (Ossify(x, danice) -> not Valuate(danice, isadora))\nforall x (Predecease(x, andriette) -> Hardfisted(andriette))\nforall x (Valuate(x, isadora) -> Sanative(x))\nforall x (Valuate(x, danice) -> Valuate(danice, andriette))\nforall x (Sanative(x) -> Predecease(x, isadora))\nValuate(danice, andriette) -> Valuate(andriette, isadora)\nforall x (Valuate(x, danice) -> Predecease(x, andriette))\nforall x (Valuate(x, andriette) -> not Valuate(x, isadora))\n\nnot Sanative(isadora)\n\nforall x (Valuate(x, isadora) -> Sanative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The tarzan is crashing. The tarzan dapple the carmine. The carmine dapple the tarzan. The carmine reassail the zelig. The zelig is packable. The zelig dapple the carmine. The zelig ford the tarzan. If something ford the zelig then the zelig does not visit the carmine. If something dapple the tarzan then the tarzan is crashing. If something reassail the carmine then it is basophilic. If something reassail the zelig then the zelig reassail the tarzan. If something is basophilic then it dapple the carmine. If the zelig reassail the tarzan then the tarzan reassail the carmine. If something reassail the zelig then it dapple the tarzan. If something reassail the tarzan then it does not visit the carmine. The zelig is basophilic.", "logic": "\nCrashing(tarzan)\nDapple(tarzan, carmine)\nDapple(carmine, tarzan)\nReassail(carmine, zelig)\nPackable(zelig)\nDapple(zelig, carmine)\nFord(zelig, tarzan)\nforall x (Ford(x, zelig) -> not Reassail(zelig, carmine))\nforall x (Dapple(x, tarzan) -> Crashing(tarzan))\nforall x (Reassail(x, carmine) -> Basophilic(x))\nforall x (Reassail(x, zelig) -> Reassail(zelig, tarzan))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) -> Dapple(x, carmine))\nReassail(zelig, tarzan) -> Reassail(tarzan, carmine)\nforall x (Reassail(x, zelig) -> Dapple(x, tarzan))\nforall x (Reassail(x, tarzan) -> not Reassail(x, carmine))\n\nBasophilic(zelig)\n\nforall x (Reassail(x, carmine) -> Basophilic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The pearla is consenting. The pearla shimmy the riane. The riane shimmy the pearla. The riane classicize the golda. The golda is incised. The golda shimmy the riane. The golda revoke the pearla. If something revoke the golda then the golda does not visit the riane. If something shimmy the pearla then the pearla is consenting. If something classicize the riane then it is agitated. If something classicize the golda then the golda classicize the pearla. If something is agitated then it shimmy the riane. If the golda classicize the pearla then the pearla classicize the riane. If something classicize the golda then it shimmy the pearla. If something classicize the pearla then it does not visit the riane. The golda does not see the riane.", "logic": "\nConsenting(pearla)\nShimmy(pearla, riane)\nShimmy(riane, pearla)\nClassicize(riane, golda)\nIncised(golda)\nShimmy(golda, riane)\nRevoke(golda, pearla)\nforall x (Revoke(x, golda) -> not Classicize(golda, riane))\nforall x (Shimmy(x, pearla) -> Consenting(pearla))\nforall x (Classicize(x, riane) -> Agitated(x))\nforall x (Classicize(x, golda) -> Classicize(golda, pearla))\nforall x (Agitated(x) -> Shimmy(x, riane))\nClassicize(golda, pearla) -> Classicize(pearla, riane)\nforall x (Classicize(x, golda) -> Shimmy(x, pearla))\nforall x (Classicize(x, pearla) -> not Classicize(x, riane))\n\nnot Revoke(golda, riane)\n\nnot Revoke(golda, riane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The evita is unintended. The evita condole the leonard. The leonard condole the evita. The leonard denazify the cappella. The cappella is sleepless. The cappella condole the leonard. The cappella aline the evita. If something aline the cappella then the cappella does not visit the leonard. If something condole the evita then the evita is unintended. If something denazify the leonard then it is sweptback. If something denazify the cappella then the cappella denazify the evita. If something is sweptback then it condole the leonard. If the cappella denazify the evita then the evita denazify the leonard. If something denazify the cappella then it condole the evita. If something denazify the evita then it does not visit the leonard. The cappella denazify the cappella.", "logic": "\nUnintended(evita)\nCondole(evita, leonard)\nCondole(leonard, evita)\nDenazify(leonard, cappella)\nSleepless(cappella)\nCondole(cappella, leonard)\nAline(cappella, evita)\nforall x (Aline(x, cappella) -> not Denazify(cappella, leonard))\nforall x (Condole(x, evita) -> Unintended(evita))\nforall x (Denazify(x, leonard) -> Sweptback(x))\nforall x (Denazify(x, cappella) -> Denazify(cappella, evita))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) -> Condole(x, leonard))\nDenazify(cappella, evita) -> Denazify(evita, leonard)\nforall x (Denazify(x, cappella) -> Condole(x, evita))\nforall x (Denazify(x, evita) -> not Denazify(x, leonard))\n\nDenazify(cappella, cappella)\n\nDenazify(cappella, cappella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The rosalia is monoatomic. The rosalia mizzle the mattheus. The mattheus mizzle the rosalia. The mattheus pillow the hiro. The hiro is unmanly. The hiro mizzle the mattheus. The hiro jilt the rosalia. If something jilt the hiro then the hiro does not visit the mattheus. If something mizzle the rosalia then the rosalia is monoatomic. If something pillow the mattheus then it is gormless. If something pillow the hiro then the hiro pillow the rosalia. If something is gormless then it mizzle the mattheus. If the hiro pillow the rosalia then the rosalia pillow the mattheus. If something pillow the hiro then it mizzle the rosalia. If something pillow the rosalia then it does not visit the mattheus. The rosalia is not unmanly.", "logic": "\nMonoatomic(rosalia)\nMizzle(rosalia, mattheus)\nMizzle(mattheus, rosalia)\nPillow(mattheus, hiro)\nUnmanly(hiro)\nMizzle(hiro, mattheus)\nJilt(hiro, rosalia)\nforall x (Jilt(x, hiro) -> not Pillow(hiro, mattheus))\nforall x (Mizzle(x, rosalia) -> Monoatomic(rosalia))\nforall x (Pillow(x, mattheus) -> Gormless(x))\nforall x (Pillow(x, hiro) -> Pillow(hiro, rosalia))\nforall x (Gormless(x) -> Mizzle(x, mattheus))\nPillow(hiro, rosalia) -> Pillow(rosalia, mattheus)\nforall x (Pillow(x, hiro) -> Mizzle(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Pillow(x, rosalia) -> not Pillow(x, mattheus))\n\nnot Unmanly(rosalia)\n\nnot Unmanly(rosalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The barbabra is stomachal. The barbabra jingle the ginelle. The ginelle jingle the barbabra. The ginelle panic the marcellus. The marcellus is inane. The marcellus jingle the ginelle. The marcellus degrease the barbabra. If something degrease the marcellus then the marcellus does not visit the ginelle. If something jingle the barbabra then the barbabra is stomachal. If something panic the ginelle then it is haphazard. If something panic the marcellus then the marcellus panic the barbabra. If something is haphazard then it jingle the ginelle. If the marcellus panic the barbabra then the barbabra panic the ginelle. If something panic the marcellus then it jingle the barbabra. If something panic the barbabra then it does not visit the ginelle. The ginelle degrease the marcellus.", "logic": "\nStomachal(barbabra)\nJingle(barbabra, ginelle)\nJingle(ginelle, barbabra)\nPanic(ginelle, marcellus)\nInane(marcellus)\nJingle(marcellus, ginelle)\nDegrease(marcellus, barbabra)\nforall x (Degrease(x, marcellus) -> not Panic(marcellus, ginelle))\nforall x (Jingle(x, barbabra) -> Stomachal(barbabra))\nforall x (Panic(x, ginelle) -> Haphazard(x))\nforall x (Panic(x, marcellus) -> Panic(marcellus, barbabra))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) -> Jingle(x, ginelle))\nPanic(marcellus, barbabra) -> Panic(barbabra, ginelle)\nforall x (Panic(x, marcellus) -> Jingle(x, barbabra))\nforall x (Panic(x, barbabra) -> not Panic(x, ginelle))\n\nDegrease(ginelle, marcellus)\n\nDegrease(ginelle, marcellus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The ioana is stoneless. The ioana is not regal. The ioana fine the chelsie. The ioana style the chelsie. The ioana style the wallas. The ioana preempt the wallas. The talia is regal. The talia style the chelsie. The talia style the wallas. The talia preempt the wallas. The chelsie is not regal. The chelsie fine the ioana. The chelsie preempt the wallas. The wallas fine the ioana. The wallas does not need the ioana. If something is regal and it preempt the chelsie then the chelsie style the ioana. If something is stoneless then it fine the talia. If something fine the talia then it preempt the chelsie. If something fine the ioana and it fine the chelsie then it style the chelsie. If something is stoneless and it does not need the chelsie then it preempt the wallas. If something preempt the chelsie and it preempt the wallas then the wallas is agnatic. The talia style the chelsie.", "logic": "\nStoneless(ioana)\nnot Regal(ioana)\nFine(ioana, chelsie)\nStyle(ioana, chelsie)\nStyle(ioana, wallas)\nPreempt(ioana, wallas)\nRegal(talia)\nStyle(talia, chelsie)\nStyle(talia, wallas)\nPreempt(talia, wallas)\nnot Regal(chelsie)\nFine(chelsie, ioana)\nPreempt(chelsie, wallas)\nFine(wallas, ioana)\nnot Style(wallas, ioana)\nforall x (Regal(x) and Preempt(x, chelsie) -> Style(chelsie, ioana))\nforall x (Stoneless(x) -> Fine(x, talia))\nforall x (Fine(x, talia) -> Preempt(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Fine(x, ioana) and Fine(x, chelsie) -> Style(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Stoneless(x) and not Style(x, chelsie) -> Preempt(x, wallas))\nforall x (Preempt(x, chelsie) and Preempt(x, wallas) -> Agnatic(wallas))\n\nStyle(talia, chelsie)\n\ntherefore Style(talia, chelsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The marget is topknotted. The marget is not extensive. The marget fool the husain. The marget inspirit the husain. The marget inspirit the arline. The marget redact the arline. The tammie is extensive. The tammie inspirit the husain. The tammie inspirit the arline. The tammie redact the arline. The husain is not extensive. The husain fool the marget. The husain redact the arline. The arline fool the marget. The arline does not need the marget. If something is extensive and it redact the husain then the husain inspirit the marget. If something is topknotted then it fool the tammie. If something fool the tammie then it redact the husain. If something fool the marget and it fool the husain then it inspirit the husain. If something is topknotted and it does not need the husain then it redact the arline. If something redact the husain and it redact the arline then the arline is dantesque. The tammie does not need the husain.", "logic": "\nTopknotted(marget)\nnot Extensive(marget)\nFool(marget, husain)\nInspirit(marget, husain)\nInspirit(marget, arline)\nRedact(marget, arline)\nExtensive(tammie)\nInspirit(tammie, husain)\nInspirit(tammie, arline)\nRedact(tammie, arline)\nnot Extensive(husain)\nFool(husain, marget)\nRedact(husain, arline)\nFool(arline, marget)\nnot Inspirit(arline, marget)\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Redact(x, husain) -> Inspirit(husain, marget))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Fool(x, tammie))\nforall x (Fool(x, tammie) -> Redact(x, husain))\nforall x (Fool(x, marget) and Fool(x, husain) -> Inspirit(x, husain))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) and not Inspirit(x, husain) -> Redact(x, arline))\nforall x (Redact(x, husain) and Redact(x, arline) -> Dantesque(arline))\n\nnot Inspirit(tammie, husain)\n\ntherefore Inspirit(tammie, husain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The kellyann is boney. The kellyann is not cancelled. The kellyann syllabize the katusha. The kellyann loot the katusha. The kellyann loot the maybelle. The kellyann case the maybelle. The waylin is cancelled. The waylin loot the katusha. The waylin loot the maybelle. The waylin case the maybelle. The katusha is not cancelled. The katusha syllabize the kellyann. The katusha case the maybelle. The maybelle syllabize the kellyann. The maybelle does not need the kellyann. If something is cancelled and it case the katusha then the katusha loot the kellyann. If something is boney then it syllabize the waylin. If something syllabize the waylin then it case the katusha. If something syllabize the kellyann and it syllabize the katusha then it loot the katusha. If something is boney and it does not need the katusha then it case the maybelle. If something case the katusha and it case the maybelle then the maybelle is relational. The kellyann syllabize the waylin.", "logic": "\nBoney(kellyann)\nnot Cancelled(kellyann)\nSyllabize(kellyann, katusha)\nLoot(kellyann, katusha)\nLoot(kellyann, maybelle)\nCase(kellyann, maybelle)\nCancelled(waylin)\nLoot(waylin, katusha)\nLoot(waylin, maybelle)\nCase(waylin, maybelle)\nnot Cancelled(katusha)\nSyllabize(katusha, kellyann)\nCase(katusha, maybelle)\nSyllabize(maybelle, kellyann)\nnot Loot(maybelle, kellyann)\nforall x (Cancelled(x) and Case(x, katusha) -> Loot(katusha, kellyann))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> Syllabize(x, waylin))\nforall x (Syllabize(x, waylin) -> Case(x, katusha))\nforall x (Syllabize(x, kellyann) and Syllabize(x, katusha) -> Loot(x, katusha))\nforall x (Boney(x) and not Loot(x, katusha) -> Case(x, maybelle))\nforall x (Case(x, katusha) and Case(x, maybelle) -> Relational(maybelle))\n\nSyllabize(kellyann, waylin)\n\nBoney(kellyann) and forall x (Boney(x) -> Syllabize(x, waylin)) -> therefore Syllabize(kellyann, waylin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The reggie is vinous. The reggie is not guiltless. The reggie snog the katerina. The reggie retread the katerina. The reggie retread the martin. The reggie torpedo the martin. The kurtis is guiltless. The kurtis retread the katerina. The kurtis retread the martin. The kurtis torpedo the martin. The katerina is not guiltless. The katerina snog the reggie. The katerina torpedo the martin. The martin snog the reggie. The martin does not need the reggie. If something is guiltless and it torpedo the katerina then the katerina retread the reggie. If something is vinous then it snog the kurtis. If something snog the kurtis then it torpedo the katerina. If something snog the reggie and it snog the katerina then it retread the katerina. If something is vinous and it does not need the katerina then it torpedo the martin. If something torpedo the katerina and it torpedo the martin then the martin is bristled. The reggie does not like the kurtis.", "logic": "\nVinous(reggie)\nnot Guiltless(reggie)\nSnog(reggie, katerina)\nRetread(reggie, katerina)\nRetread(reggie, martin)\nTorpedo(reggie, martin)\nGuiltless(kurtis)\nRetread(kurtis, katerina)\nRetread(kurtis, martin)\nTorpedo(kurtis, martin)\nnot Guiltless(katerina)\nSnog(katerina, reggie)\nTorpedo(katerina, martin)\nSnog(martin, reggie)\nnot Retread(martin, reggie)\nforall x (Guiltless(x) and Torpedo(x, katerina) -> Retread(katerina, reggie))\nforall x (Vinous(x) -> Snog(x, kurtis))\nforall x (Snog(x, kurtis) -> Torpedo(x, katerina))\nforall x (Snog(x, reggie) and Snog(x, katerina) -> Retread(x, katerina))\nforall x (Vinous(x) and not Retread(x, katerina) -> Torpedo(x, martin))\nforall x (Torpedo(x, katerina) and Torpedo(x, martin) -> Bristled(martin))\n\nnot Snog(reggie, kurtis)\n\nVinous(reggie) and forall x (Vinous(x) -> Snog(x, kurtis)) -> therefore Snog(reggie, kurtis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The cally is symmetric. The cally is not dripless. The cally commission the gaspar. The cally clop the gaspar. The cally clop the francois. The cally skate the francois. The lanita is dripless. The lanita clop the gaspar. The lanita clop the francois. The lanita skate the francois. The gaspar is not dripless. The gaspar commission the cally. The gaspar skate the francois. The francois commission the cally. The francois does not need the cally. If something is dripless and it skate the gaspar then the gaspar clop the cally. If something is symmetric then it commission the lanita. If something commission the lanita then it skate the gaspar. If something commission the cally and it commission the gaspar then it clop the gaspar. If something is symmetric and it does not need the gaspar then it skate the francois. If something skate the gaspar and it skate the francois then the francois is ictic. The cally skate the gaspar.", "logic": "\nSymmetric(cally)\nnot Dripless(cally)\nCommission(cally, gaspar)\nClop(cally, gaspar)\nClop(cally, francois)\nSkate(cally, francois)\nDripless(lanita)\nClop(lanita, gaspar)\nClop(lanita, francois)\nSkate(lanita, francois)\nnot Dripless(gaspar)\nCommission(gaspar, cally)\nSkate(gaspar, francois)\nCommission(francois, cally)\nnot Clop(francois, cally)\nforall x (Dripless(x) and Skate(x, gaspar) -> Clop(gaspar, cally))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Commission(x, lanita))\nforall x (Commission(x, lanita) -> Skate(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Commission(x, cally) and Commission(x, gaspar) -> Clop(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and not Clop(x, gaspar) -> Skate(x, francois))\nforall x (Skate(x, gaspar) and Skate(x, francois) -> Ictic(francois))\n\nSkate(cally, gaspar)\n\nSymmetric(cally) and forall x (Symmetric(x) -> Commission(x, lanita)) -> therefore Commission(cally, lanita) Commission(cally, lanita) and forall x (Commission(x, lanita) -> Skate(x, gaspar)) -> therefore Skate(cally, gaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The stesha is tractile. The stesha is not indwelling. The stesha pedicure the phaidra. The stesha complot the phaidra. The stesha complot the bertha. The stesha besmirch the bertha. The neddie is indwelling. The neddie complot the phaidra. The neddie complot the bertha. The neddie besmirch the bertha. The phaidra is not indwelling. The phaidra pedicure the stesha. The phaidra besmirch the bertha. The bertha pedicure the stesha. The bertha does not need the stesha. If something is indwelling and it besmirch the phaidra then the phaidra complot the stesha. If something is tractile then it pedicure the neddie. If something pedicure the neddie then it besmirch the phaidra. If something pedicure the stesha and it pedicure the phaidra then it complot the phaidra. If something is tractile and it does not need the phaidra then it besmirch the bertha. If something besmirch the phaidra and it besmirch the bertha then the bertha is bastioned. The stesha does not see the phaidra.", "logic": "\nTractile(stesha)\nnot Indwelling(stesha)\nPedicure(stesha, phaidra)\nComplot(stesha, phaidra)\nComplot(stesha, bertha)\nBesmirch(stesha, bertha)\nIndwelling(neddie)\nComplot(neddie, phaidra)\nComplot(neddie, bertha)\nBesmirch(neddie, bertha)\nnot Indwelling(phaidra)\nPedicure(phaidra, stesha)\nBesmirch(phaidra, bertha)\nPedicure(bertha, stesha)\nnot Complot(bertha, stesha)\nforall x (Indwelling(x) and Besmirch(x, phaidra) -> Complot(phaidra, stesha))\nforall x (Tractile(x) -> Pedicure(x, neddie))\nforall x (Pedicure(x, neddie) -> Besmirch(x, phaidra))\nforall x (Pedicure(x, stesha) and Pedicure(x, phaidra) -> Complot(x, phaidra))\nforall x (Tractile(x) and not Complot(x, phaidra) -> Besmirch(x, bertha))\nforall x (Besmirch(x, phaidra) and Besmirch(x, bertha) -> Bastioned(bertha))\n\nnot Besmirch(stesha, phaidra)\n\nTractile(stesha) and forall x (Tractile(x) -> Pedicure(x, neddie)) -> therefore Pedicure(stesha, neddie) Pedicure(stesha, neddie) and forall x (Pedicure(x, neddie) -> Besmirch(x, phaidra)) -> therefore Besmirch(stesha, phaidra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The cayla is mitigable. The cayla is not inflated. The cayla eyeball the wyndham. The cayla veto the wyndham. The cayla veto the lib. The cayla annunciate the lib. The karlie is inflated. The karlie veto the wyndham. The karlie veto the lib. The karlie annunciate the lib. The wyndham is not inflated. The wyndham eyeball the cayla. The wyndham annunciate the lib. The lib eyeball the cayla. The lib does not need the cayla. If something is inflated and it annunciate the wyndham then the wyndham veto the cayla. If something is mitigable then it eyeball the karlie. If something eyeball the karlie then it annunciate the wyndham. If something eyeball the cayla and it eyeball the wyndham then it veto the wyndham. If something is mitigable and it does not need the wyndham then it annunciate the lib. If something annunciate the wyndham and it annunciate the lib then the lib is narrative. The lib is narrative.", "logic": "\nMitigable(cayla)\nnot Inflated(cayla)\nEyeball(cayla, wyndham)\nVeto(cayla, wyndham)\nVeto(cayla, lib)\nAnnunciate(cayla, lib)\nInflated(karlie)\nVeto(karlie, wyndham)\nVeto(karlie, lib)\nAnnunciate(karlie, lib)\nnot Inflated(wyndham)\nEyeball(wyndham, cayla)\nAnnunciate(wyndham, lib)\nEyeball(lib, cayla)\nnot Veto(lib, cayla)\nforall x (Inflated(x) and Annunciate(x, wyndham) -> Veto(wyndham, cayla))\nforall x (Mitigable(x) -> Eyeball(x, karlie))\nforall x (Eyeball(x, karlie) -> Annunciate(x, wyndham))\nforall x (Eyeball(x, cayla) and Eyeball(x, wyndham) -> Veto(x, wyndham))\nforall x (Mitigable(x) and not Veto(x, wyndham) -> Annunciate(x, lib))\nforall x (Annunciate(x, wyndham) and Annunciate(x, lib) -> Narrative(lib))\n\nNarrative(lib)\n\nMitigable(cayla) and forall x (Mitigable(x) -> Eyeball(x, karlie)) -> therefore Eyeball(cayla, karlie) Eyeball(cayla, karlie) and forall x (Eyeball(x, karlie) -> Annunciate(x, wyndham)) -> therefore Annunciate(cayla, wyndham) Annunciate(cayla, wyndham) and Annunciate(cayla, lib) and forall x (Annunciate(x, wyndham) and Annunciate(x, lib) -> Narrative(lib)) -> therefore Narrative(lib)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The lianne is tudor. The lianne is not perineal. The lianne levy the elenore. The lianne clamber the elenore. The lianne clamber the hiralal. The lianne sublimate the hiralal. The ignacio is perineal. The ignacio clamber the elenore. The ignacio clamber the hiralal. The ignacio sublimate the hiralal. The elenore is not perineal. The elenore levy the lianne. The elenore sublimate the hiralal. The hiralal levy the lianne. The hiralal does not need the lianne. If something is perineal and it sublimate the elenore then the elenore clamber the lianne. If something is tudor then it levy the ignacio. If something levy the ignacio then it sublimate the elenore. If something levy the lianne and it levy the elenore then it clamber the elenore. If something is tudor and it does not need the elenore then it sublimate the hiralal. If something sublimate the elenore and it sublimate the hiralal then the hiralal is breakaway. The hiralal is not breakaway.", "logic": "\nTudor(lianne)\nnot Perineal(lianne)\nLevy(lianne, elenore)\nClamber(lianne, elenore)\nClamber(lianne, hiralal)\nSublimate(lianne, hiralal)\nPerineal(ignacio)\nClamber(ignacio, elenore)\nClamber(ignacio, hiralal)\nSublimate(ignacio, hiralal)\nnot Perineal(elenore)\nLevy(elenore, lianne)\nSublimate(elenore, hiralal)\nLevy(hiralal, lianne)\nnot Clamber(hiralal, lianne)\nforall x (Perineal(x) and Sublimate(x, elenore) -> Clamber(elenore, lianne))\nforall x (Tudor(x) -> Levy(x, ignacio))\nforall x (Levy(x, ignacio) -> Sublimate(x, elenore))\nforall x (Levy(x, lianne) and Levy(x, elenore) -> Clamber(x, elenore))\nforall x (Tudor(x) and not Clamber(x, elenore) -> Sublimate(x, hiralal))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, elenore) and Sublimate(x, hiralal) -> Breakaway(hiralal))\n\nnot Breakaway(hiralal)\n\nTudor(lianne) and forall x (Tudor(x) -> Levy(x, ignacio)) -> therefore Levy(lianne, ignacio) Levy(lianne, ignacio) and forall x (Levy(x, ignacio) -> Sublimate(x, elenore)) -> therefore Sublimate(lianne, elenore) Sublimate(lianne, elenore) and Sublimate(lianne, hiralal) and forall x (Sublimate(x, elenore) and Sublimate(x, hiralal) -> Breakaway(hiralal)) -> therefore Breakaway(hiralal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The sherwynd is faithful. The sherwynd is not storeyed. The sherwynd boil the olympie. The sherwynd lobby the olympie. The sherwynd lobby the alfred. The sherwynd shovel the alfred. The penny is storeyed. The penny lobby the olympie. The penny lobby the alfred. The penny shovel the alfred. The olympie is not storeyed. The olympie boil the sherwynd. The olympie shovel the alfred. The alfred boil the sherwynd. The alfred does not need the sherwynd. If something is storeyed and it shovel the olympie then the olympie lobby the sherwynd. If something is faithful then it boil the penny. If something boil the penny then it shovel the olympie. If something boil the sherwynd and it boil the olympie then it lobby the olympie. If something is faithful and it does not need the olympie then it shovel the alfred. If something shovel the olympie and it shovel the alfred then the alfred is seated. The alfred does not see the olympie.", "logic": "\nFaithful(sherwynd)\nnot Storeyed(sherwynd)\nBoil(sherwynd, olympie)\nLobby(sherwynd, olympie)\nLobby(sherwynd, alfred)\nShovel(sherwynd, alfred)\nStoreyed(penny)\nLobby(penny, olympie)\nLobby(penny, alfred)\nShovel(penny, alfred)\nnot Storeyed(olympie)\nBoil(olympie, sherwynd)\nShovel(olympie, alfred)\nBoil(alfred, sherwynd)\nnot Lobby(alfred, sherwynd)\nforall x (Storeyed(x) and Shovel(x, olympie) -> Lobby(olympie, sherwynd))\nforall x (Faithful(x) -> Boil(x, penny))\nforall x (Boil(x, penny) -> Shovel(x, olympie))\nforall x (Boil(x, sherwynd) and Boil(x, olympie) -> Lobby(x, olympie))\nforall x (Faithful(x) and not Lobby(x, olympie) -> Shovel(x, alfred))\nforall x (Shovel(x, olympie) and Shovel(x, alfred) -> Seated(alfred))\n\nnot Shovel(alfred, olympie)\n\nforall x (Boil(x, penny) -> Shovel(x, olympie)) <- forall x (Faithful(x) -> Boil(x, penny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The glenna is valvular. The glenna is not modified. The glenna metabolize the nan. The glenna smite the nan. The glenna smite the jeffie. The glenna infiltrate the jeffie. The athena is modified. The athena smite the nan. The athena smite the jeffie. The athena infiltrate the jeffie. The nan is not modified. The nan metabolize the glenna. The nan infiltrate the jeffie. The jeffie metabolize the glenna. The jeffie does not need the glenna. If something is modified and it infiltrate the nan then the nan smite the glenna. If something is valvular then it metabolize the athena. If something metabolize the athena then it infiltrate the nan. If something metabolize the glenna and it metabolize the nan then it smite the nan. If something is valvular and it does not need the nan then it infiltrate the jeffie. If something infiltrate the nan and it infiltrate the jeffie then the jeffie is stalemated. The jeffie infiltrate the jeffie.", "logic": "\nValvular(glenna)\nnot Modified(glenna)\nMetabolize(glenna, nan)\nSmite(glenna, nan)\nSmite(glenna, jeffie)\nInfiltrate(glenna, jeffie)\nModified(athena)\nSmite(athena, nan)\nSmite(athena, jeffie)\nInfiltrate(athena, jeffie)\nnot Modified(nan)\nMetabolize(nan, glenna)\nInfiltrate(nan, jeffie)\nMetabolize(jeffie, glenna)\nnot Smite(jeffie, glenna)\nforall x (Modified(x) and Infiltrate(x, nan) -> Smite(nan, glenna))\nforall x (Valvular(x) -> Metabolize(x, athena))\nforall x (Metabolize(x, athena) -> Infiltrate(x, nan))\nforall x (Metabolize(x, glenna) and Metabolize(x, nan) -> Smite(x, nan))\nforall x (Valvular(x) and not Smite(x, nan) -> Infiltrate(x, jeffie))\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, nan) and Infiltrate(x, jeffie) -> Stalemated(jeffie))\n\nInfiltrate(jeffie, jeffie)\n\nforall x (Valvular(x) and not Smite(x, nan) -> Infiltrate(x, jeffie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The daffy is nonhuman. The daffy is not numeral. The daffy oxygenize the chrissy. The daffy goggle the chrissy. The daffy goggle the lori. The daffy book the lori. The mickie is numeral. The mickie goggle the chrissy. The mickie goggle the lori. The mickie book the lori. The chrissy is not numeral. The chrissy oxygenize the daffy. The chrissy book the lori. The lori oxygenize the daffy. The lori does not need the daffy. If something is numeral and it book the chrissy then the chrissy goggle the daffy. If something is nonhuman then it oxygenize the mickie. If something oxygenize the mickie then it book the chrissy. If something oxygenize the daffy and it oxygenize the chrissy then it goggle the chrissy. If something is nonhuman and it does not need the chrissy then it book the lori. If something book the chrissy and it book the lori then the lori is unsigned. The chrissy does not need the daffy.", "logic": "\nNonhuman(daffy)\nnot Numeral(daffy)\nOxygenize(daffy, chrissy)\nGoggle(daffy, chrissy)\nGoggle(daffy, lori)\nBook(daffy, lori)\nNumeral(mickie)\nGoggle(mickie, chrissy)\nGoggle(mickie, lori)\nBook(mickie, lori)\nnot Numeral(chrissy)\nOxygenize(chrissy, daffy)\nBook(chrissy, lori)\nOxygenize(lori, daffy)\nnot Goggle(lori, daffy)\nforall x (Numeral(x) and Book(x, chrissy) -> Goggle(chrissy, daffy))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) -> Oxygenize(x, mickie))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, mickie) -> Book(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, daffy) and Oxygenize(x, chrissy) -> Goggle(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) and not Goggle(x, chrissy) -> Book(x, lori))\nforall x (Book(x, chrissy) and Book(x, lori) -> Unsigned(lori))\n\nnot Goggle(chrissy, daffy)\n\nforall x (Numeral(x) and Book(x, chrissy) -> Goggle(chrissy, daffy)) <- forall x (Oxygenize(x, mickie) -> Book(x, chrissy)) <- forall x (Nonhuman(x) -> Oxygenize(x, mickie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The lacee is unparallel. The lacee is not cornish. The lacee laze the temp. The lacee entwine the temp. The lacee entwine the deena. The lacee foot the deena. The priscilla is cornish. The priscilla entwine the temp. The priscilla entwine the deena. The priscilla foot the deena. The temp is not cornish. The temp laze the lacee. The temp foot the deena. The deena laze the lacee. The deena does not need the lacee. If something is cornish and it foot the temp then the temp entwine the lacee. If something is unparallel then it laze the priscilla. If something laze the priscilla then it foot the temp. If something laze the lacee and it laze the temp then it entwine the temp. If something is unparallel and it does not need the temp then it foot the deena. If something foot the temp and it foot the deena then the deena is huxleian. The deena laze the priscilla.", "logic": "\nUnparallel(lacee)\nnot Cornish(lacee)\nLaze(lacee, temp)\nEntwine(lacee, temp)\nEntwine(lacee, deena)\nFoot(lacee, deena)\nCornish(priscilla)\nEntwine(priscilla, temp)\nEntwine(priscilla, deena)\nFoot(priscilla, deena)\nnot Cornish(temp)\nLaze(temp, lacee)\nFoot(temp, deena)\nLaze(deena, lacee)\nnot Entwine(deena, lacee)\nforall x (Cornish(x) and Foot(x, temp) -> Entwine(temp, lacee))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Laze(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Laze(x, priscilla) -> Foot(x, temp))\nforall x (Laze(x, lacee) and Laze(x, temp) -> Entwine(x, temp))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) and not Entwine(x, temp) -> Foot(x, deena))\nforall x (Foot(x, temp) and Foot(x, deena) -> Huxleian(deena))\n\nLaze(deena, priscilla)\n\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Laze(x, priscilla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The ariana is starless. The ariana is not plotted. The ariana enthrone the allyson. The ariana march the allyson. The ariana march the dionis. The ariana upend the dionis. The sky is plotted. The sky march the allyson. The sky march the dionis. The sky upend the dionis. The allyson is not plotted. The allyson enthrone the ariana. The allyson upend the dionis. The dionis enthrone the ariana. The dionis does not need the ariana. If something is plotted and it upend the allyson then the allyson march the ariana. If something is starless then it enthrone the sky. If something enthrone the sky then it upend the allyson. If something enthrone the ariana and it enthrone the allyson then it march the allyson. If something is starless and it does not need the allyson then it upend the dionis. If something upend the allyson and it upend the dionis then the dionis is vertebral. The allyson is not kind.", "logic": "\nStarless(ariana)\nnot Plotted(ariana)\nEnthrone(ariana, allyson)\nMarch(ariana, allyson)\nMarch(ariana, dionis)\nUpend(ariana, dionis)\nPlotted(sky)\nMarch(sky, allyson)\nMarch(sky, dionis)\nUpend(sky, dionis)\nnot Plotted(allyson)\nEnthrone(allyson, ariana)\nUpend(allyson, dionis)\nEnthrone(dionis, ariana)\nnot March(dionis, ariana)\nforall x (Plotted(x) and Upend(x, allyson) -> March(allyson, ariana))\nforall x (Starless(x) -> Enthrone(x, sky))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, sky) -> Upend(x, allyson))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, ariana) and Enthrone(x, allyson) -> March(x, allyson))\nforall x (Starless(x) and not March(x, allyson) -> Upend(x, dionis))\nforall x (Upend(x, allyson) and Upend(x, dionis) -> Vertebral(dionis))\n\nnot Kind(allyson)\n\nnot Kind(allyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The tilly is nontaxable. The tilly is not frenetic. The tilly overflow the delia. The tilly dehydrate the delia. The tilly dehydrate the mavis. The tilly express the mavis. The flory is frenetic. The flory dehydrate the delia. The flory dehydrate the mavis. The flory express the mavis. The delia is not frenetic. The delia overflow the tilly. The delia express the mavis. The mavis overflow the tilly. The mavis does not need the tilly. If something is frenetic and it express the delia then the delia dehydrate the tilly. If something is nontaxable then it overflow the flory. If something overflow the flory then it express the delia. If something overflow the tilly and it overflow the delia then it dehydrate the delia. If something is nontaxable and it does not need the delia then it express the mavis. If something express the delia and it express the mavis then the mavis is mutinous. The tilly is nice.", "logic": "\nNontaxable(tilly)\nnot Frenetic(tilly)\nOverflow(tilly, delia)\nDehydrate(tilly, delia)\nDehydrate(tilly, mavis)\nExpress(tilly, mavis)\nFrenetic(flory)\nDehydrate(flory, delia)\nDehydrate(flory, mavis)\nExpress(flory, mavis)\nnot Frenetic(delia)\nOverflow(delia, tilly)\nExpress(delia, mavis)\nOverflow(mavis, tilly)\nnot Dehydrate(mavis, tilly)\nforall x (Frenetic(x) and Express(x, delia) -> Dehydrate(delia, tilly))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) -> Overflow(x, flory))\nforall x (Overflow(x, flory) -> Express(x, delia))\nforall x (Overflow(x, tilly) and Overflow(x, delia) -> Dehydrate(x, delia))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and not Dehydrate(x, delia) -> Express(x, mavis))\nforall x (Express(x, delia) and Express(x, mavis) -> Mutinous(mavis))\n\nNice(tilly)\n\nNice(tilly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The mace is indecent. The mace is not looted. The mace ferry the tamiko. The mace unstaple the tamiko. The mace unstaple the hersh. The mace extrude the hersh. The sofia is looted. The sofia unstaple the tamiko. The sofia unstaple the hersh. The sofia extrude the hersh. The tamiko is not looted. The tamiko ferry the mace. The tamiko extrude the hersh. The hersh ferry the mace. The hersh does not need the mace. If something is looted and it extrude the tamiko then the tamiko unstaple the mace. If something is indecent then it ferry the sofia. If something ferry the sofia then it extrude the tamiko. If something ferry the mace and it ferry the tamiko then it unstaple the tamiko. If something is indecent and it does not need the tamiko then it extrude the hersh. If something extrude the tamiko and it extrude the hersh then the hersh is timely. The hersh does not like the tamiko.", "logic": "\nIndecent(mace)\nnot Looted(mace)\nFerry(mace, tamiko)\nUnstaple(mace, tamiko)\nUnstaple(mace, hersh)\nExtrude(mace, hersh)\nLooted(sofia)\nUnstaple(sofia, tamiko)\nUnstaple(sofia, hersh)\nExtrude(sofia, hersh)\nnot Looted(tamiko)\nFerry(tamiko, mace)\nExtrude(tamiko, hersh)\nFerry(hersh, mace)\nnot Unstaple(hersh, mace)\nforall x (Looted(x) and Extrude(x, tamiko) -> Unstaple(tamiko, mace))\nforall x (Indecent(x) -> Ferry(x, sofia))\nforall x (Ferry(x, sofia) -> Extrude(x, tamiko))\nforall x (Ferry(x, mace) and Ferry(x, tamiko) -> Unstaple(x, tamiko))\nforall x (Indecent(x) and not Unstaple(x, tamiko) -> Extrude(x, hersh))\nforall x (Extrude(x, tamiko) and Extrude(x, hersh) -> Timely(hersh))\n\nnot Ferry(hersh, tamiko)\n\nnot Ferry(hersh, tamiko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The mellisent is otiose. The mellisent is not neither. The mellisent stiffen the curtis. The mellisent protract the curtis. The mellisent protract the carole. The mellisent sandwich the carole. The avi is neither. The avi protract the curtis. The avi protract the carole. The avi sandwich the carole. The curtis is not neither. The curtis stiffen the mellisent. The curtis sandwich the carole. The carole stiffen the mellisent. The carole does not need the mellisent. If something is neither and it sandwich the curtis then the curtis protract the mellisent. If something is otiose then it stiffen the avi. If something stiffen the avi then it sandwich the curtis. If something stiffen the mellisent and it stiffen the curtis then it protract the curtis. If something is otiose and it does not need the curtis then it sandwich the carole. If something sandwich the curtis and it sandwich the carole then the carole is diarrheal. The avi is diarrheal.", "logic": "\nOtiose(mellisent)\nnot Neither(mellisent)\nStiffen(mellisent, curtis)\nProtract(mellisent, curtis)\nProtract(mellisent, carole)\nSandwich(mellisent, carole)\nNeither(avi)\nProtract(avi, curtis)\nProtract(avi, carole)\nSandwich(avi, carole)\nnot Neither(curtis)\nStiffen(curtis, mellisent)\nSandwich(curtis, carole)\nStiffen(carole, mellisent)\nnot Protract(carole, mellisent)\nforall x (Neither(x) and Sandwich(x, curtis) -> Protract(curtis, mellisent))\nforall x (Otiose(x) -> Stiffen(x, avi))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, avi) -> Sandwich(x, curtis))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, mellisent) and Stiffen(x, curtis) -> Protract(x, curtis))\nforall x (Otiose(x) and not Protract(x, curtis) -> Sandwich(x, carole))\nforall x (Sandwich(x, curtis) and Sandwich(x, carole) -> Diarrheal(carole))\n\nDiarrheal(avi)\n\nDiarrheal(avi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The benjamen is satyrical. Kind, hearty people are conjugal. If the benjamen is mawkish and the benjamen is hearty then the benjamen is satyrical. If someone is pizzicato then they are mawkish. If someone is satyrical then they are mawkish. If someone is pizzicato and satyrical then they are hearty. Kind people are pizzicato. The benjamen is satyrical.", "logic": "\nSatyrical(benjamen)\nforall x (Mawkish(x) and Hearty(x) -> Conjugal(x))\nMawkish(benjamen) and Hearty(benjamen) -> Satyrical(benjamen)\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Satyrical(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) and Satyrical(x) -> Hearty(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Pizzicato(x))\n\nSatyrical(benjamen)\n\ntherefore Satyrical(benjamen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The traci is unschooled. Kind, handheld people are corymbose. If the traci is eighth and the traci is handheld then the traci is unschooled. If someone is headlike then they are eighth. If someone is unschooled then they are eighth. If someone is headlike and unschooled then they are handheld. Kind people are headlike. The traci is not unschooled.", "logic": "\nUnschooled(traci)\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Handheld(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nEighth(traci) and Handheld(traci) -> Unschooled(traci)\nforall x (Headlike(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Unschooled(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Headlike(x) and Unschooled(x) -> Handheld(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) -> Headlike(x))\n\nnot Unschooled(traci)\n\ntherefore Unschooled(traci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The spike is mismated. Kind, ataraxic people are rearmost. If the spike is baronial and the spike is ataraxic then the spike is mismated. If someone is hostile then they are baronial. If someone is mismated then they are baronial. If someone is hostile and mismated then they are ataraxic. Kind people are hostile. The spike is baronial.", "logic": "\nMismated(spike)\nforall x (Baronial(x) and Ataraxic(x) -> Rearmost(x))\nBaronial(spike) and Ataraxic(spike) -> Mismated(spike)\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Baronial(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) -> Baronial(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) and Mismated(x) -> Ataraxic(x))\nforall x (Baronial(x) -> Hostile(x))\n\nBaronial(spike)\n\nMismated(spike) and forall x (Mismated(x) -> Baronial(x)) -> therefore Baronial(spike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The delaney is feasible. Kind, ungrateful people are rotten. If the delaney is intrinsic and the delaney is ungrateful then the delaney is feasible. If someone is futurist then they are intrinsic. If someone is feasible then they are intrinsic. If someone is futurist and feasible then they are ungrateful. Kind people are futurist. The delaney is not intrinsic.", "logic": "\nFeasible(delaney)\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> Rotten(x))\nIntrinsic(delaney) and Ungrateful(delaney) -> Feasible(delaney)\nforall x (Futurist(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Futurist(x) and Feasible(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Futurist(x))\n\nnot Intrinsic(delaney)\n\nFeasible(delaney) and forall x (Feasible(x) -> Intrinsic(x)) -> therefore Intrinsic(delaney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The amandy is sculptured. Kind, peltate people are banner. If the amandy is uneasy and the amandy is peltate then the amandy is sculptured. If someone is recherche then they are uneasy. If someone is sculptured then they are uneasy. If someone is recherche and sculptured then they are peltate. Kind people are recherche. The amandy is recherche.", "logic": "\nSculptured(amandy)\nforall x (Uneasy(x) and Peltate(x) -> Banner(x))\nUneasy(amandy) and Peltate(amandy) -> Sculptured(amandy)\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) and Sculptured(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Recherche(x))\n\nRecherche(amandy)\n\nSculptured(amandy) and forall x (Sculptured(x) -> Uneasy(x)) -> therefore Uneasy(amandy) Uneasy(amandy) and forall x (Uneasy(x) -> Recherche(x)) -> therefore Recherche(amandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The winnifred is natal. Kind, sourish people are sinusoidal. If the winnifred is infrasonic and the winnifred is sourish then the winnifred is natal. If someone is icebound then they are infrasonic. If someone is natal then they are infrasonic. If someone is icebound and natal then they are sourish. Kind people are icebound. The winnifred is not icebound.", "logic": "\nNatal(winnifred)\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) and Sourish(x) -> Sinusoidal(x))\nInfrasonic(winnifred) and Sourish(winnifred) -> Natal(winnifred)\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) and Natal(x) -> Sourish(x))\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) -> Icebound(x))\n\nnot Icebound(winnifred)\n\nNatal(winnifred) and forall x (Natal(x) -> Infrasonic(x)) -> therefore Infrasonic(winnifred) Infrasonic(winnifred) and forall x (Infrasonic(x) -> Icebound(x)) -> therefore Icebound(winnifred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The matthias is ionised. Kind, verified people are anoxic. If the matthias is major and the matthias is verified then the matthias is ionised. If someone is managerial then they are major. If someone is ionised then they are major. If someone is managerial and ionised then they are verified. Kind people are managerial. The matthias is verified.", "logic": "\nIonised(matthias)\nforall x (Major(x) and Verified(x) -> Anoxic(x))\nMajor(matthias) and Verified(matthias) -> Ionised(matthias)\nforall x (Managerial(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Ionised(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Ionised(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Major(x) -> Managerial(x))\n\nVerified(matthias)\n\nIonised(matthias) and forall x (Ionised(x) -> Major(x)) -> therefore Major(matthias) Major(matthias) and forall x (Major(x) -> Managerial(x)) -> therefore Managerial(matthias) Managerial(matthias) and Ionised(matthias) and forall x (Managerial(x) and Ionised(x) -> Verified(x)) -> therefore Verified(matthias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The hannah is unrigged. Kind, undoable people are gigantic. If the hannah is apoplectic and the hannah is undoable then the hannah is unrigged. If someone is famous then they are apoplectic. If someone is unrigged then they are apoplectic. If someone is famous and unrigged then they are undoable. Kind people are famous. The hannah is not undoable.", "logic": "\nUnrigged(hannah)\nforall x (Apoplectic(x) and Undoable(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nApoplectic(hannah) and Undoable(hannah) -> Unrigged(hannah)\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Apoplectic(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) -> Apoplectic(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) and Unrigged(x) -> Undoable(x))\nforall x (Apoplectic(x) -> Famous(x))\n\nnot Undoable(hannah)\n\nUnrigged(hannah) and forall x (Unrigged(x) -> Apoplectic(x)) -> therefore Apoplectic(hannah) Apoplectic(hannah) and forall x (Apoplectic(x) -> Famous(x)) -> therefore Famous(hannah) Famous(hannah) and Unrigged(hannah) and forall x (Famous(x) and Unrigged(x) -> Undoable(x)) -> therefore Undoable(hannah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The maynard is echoless. Kind, gangling people are jacksonian. If the maynard is untired and the maynard is gangling then the maynard is echoless. If someone is muscular then they are untired. If someone is echoless then they are untired. If someone is muscular and echoless then they are gangling. Kind people are muscular. The maynard does not like the maynard.", "logic": "\nEcholess(maynard)\nforall x (Untired(x) and Gangling(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nUntired(maynard) and Gangling(maynard) -> Echoless(maynard)\nforall x (Muscular(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Echoless(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Muscular(x) and Echoless(x) -> Gangling(x))\nforall x (Untired(x) -> Muscular(x))\n\nnot Likes(maynard, maynard)\n\nnot Likes(maynard, maynard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The debor is designing. Kind, abject people are astronomic. If the debor is neuronic and the debor is abject then the debor is designing. If someone is spoilable then they are neuronic. If someone is designing then they are neuronic. If someone is spoilable and designing then they are abject. Kind people are spoilable. The debor visits the debor.", "logic": "\nDesigning(debor)\nforall x (Neuronic(x) and Abject(x) -> Astronomic(x))\nNeuronic(debor) and Abject(debor) -> Designing(debor)\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Designing(x) -> Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) and Designing(x) -> Abject(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Spoilable(x))\n\nVisits(debor, debor)\n\nVisits(debor, debor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "Laurella is embroiled. Laurella is chivalric. Laurella is mauve. Laurella is wimpish. Ashley is nett. Ashley is embroiled. Ashley is courageous. Ashley is mauve. Karry is nett. Karry is embroiled. Karry is courageous. Karry is chivalric. Karry is mauve. Cherrita is embroiled. Cherrita is chivalric. Cherrita is unended. If Laurella is wimpish and Laurella is embroiled then Laurella is courageous. Smart people are courageous. If someone is nett and embroiled then they are unended. Kind people are mauve. If someone is mauve and embroiled then they are nett. If Karry is wimpish then Karry is chivalric. Ashley is nett.", "logic": "\nEmbroiled(laurella)\nChivalric(laurella)\nMauve(laurella)\nWimpish(laurella)\nNett(ashley)\nEmbroiled(ashley)\nCourageous(ashley)\nMauve(ashley)\nNett(karry)\nEmbroiled(karry)\nCourageous(karry)\nChivalric(karry)\nMauve(karry)\nEmbroiled(cherrita)\nChivalric(cherrita)\nUnended(cherrita)\nWimpish(laurella) and Embroiled(laurella) -> Courageous(laurella)\nforall x (Unended(x) -> Courageous(x))\nforall x (Nett(x) and Embroiled(x) -> Unended(x))\nforall x (Courageous(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Embroiled(x) -> Nett(x))\nWimpish(karry) -> Chivalric(karry)\n\nNett(ashley)\n\ntherefore Nett(ashley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Alexander is qatari. Alexander is answering. Alexander is disposed. Alexander is handheld. Foster is augitic. Foster is qatari. Foster is booked. Foster is disposed. Dewitt is augitic. Dewitt is qatari. Dewitt is booked. Dewitt is answering. Dewitt is disposed. Pail is qatari. Pail is answering. Pail is anguillan. If Alexander is handheld and Alexander is qatari then Alexander is booked. Smart people are booked. If someone is augitic and qatari then they are anguillan. Kind people are disposed. If someone is disposed and qatari then they are augitic. If Dewitt is handheld then Dewitt is answering. Dewitt is not answering.", "logic": "\nQatari(alexander)\nAnswering(alexander)\nDisposed(alexander)\nHandheld(alexander)\nAugitic(foster)\nQatari(foster)\nBooked(foster)\nDisposed(foster)\nAugitic(dewitt)\nQatari(dewitt)\nBooked(dewitt)\nAnswering(dewitt)\nDisposed(dewitt)\nQatari(pail)\nAnswering(pail)\nAnguillan(pail)\nHandheld(alexander) and Qatari(alexander) -> Booked(alexander)\nforall x (Anguillan(x) -> Booked(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) and Qatari(x) -> Anguillan(x))\nforall x (Booked(x) -> Disposed(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Qatari(x) -> Augitic(x))\nHandheld(dewitt) -> Answering(dewitt)\n\nnot Answering(dewitt)\n\ntherefore Answering(dewitt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Karia is heedless. Karia is inheriting. Karia is fourhanded. Karia is shiny. Morganica is unguided. Morganica is heedless. Morganica is bent. Morganica is fourhanded. Fran is unguided. Fran is heedless. Fran is bent. Fran is inheriting. Fran is fourhanded. Joye is heedless. Joye is inheriting. Joye is united. If Karia is shiny and Karia is heedless then Karia is bent. Smart people are bent. If someone is unguided and heedless then they are united. Kind people are fourhanded. If someone is fourhanded and heedless then they are unguided. If Fran is shiny then Fran is inheriting. Joye is bent.", "logic": "\nHeedless(karia)\nInheriting(karia)\nFourhanded(karia)\nShiny(karia)\nUnguided(morganica)\nHeedless(morganica)\nBent(morganica)\nFourhanded(morganica)\nUnguided(fran)\nHeedless(fran)\nBent(fran)\nInheriting(fran)\nFourhanded(fran)\nHeedless(joye)\nInheriting(joye)\nUnited(joye)\nShiny(karia) and Heedless(karia) -> Bent(karia)\nforall x (United(x) -> Bent(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) and Heedless(x) -> United(x))\nforall x (Bent(x) -> Fourhanded(x))\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) and Heedless(x) -> Unguided(x))\nShiny(fran) -> Inheriting(fran)\n\nBent(joye)\n\nUnited(joye) and forall x (United(x) -> Bent(x)) -> therefore Bent(joye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Saunder is manichee. Saunder is sedative. Saunder is suspensive. Saunder is unhindered. Tootsie is whitened. Tootsie is manichee. Tootsie is kooky. Tootsie is suspensive. Hilde is whitened. Hilde is manichee. Hilde is kooky. Hilde is sedative. Hilde is suspensive. Brodie is manichee. Brodie is sedative. Brodie is thundering. If Saunder is unhindered and Saunder is manichee then Saunder is kooky. Smart people are kooky. If someone is whitened and manichee then they are thundering. Kind people are suspensive. If someone is suspensive and manichee then they are whitened. If Hilde is unhindered then Hilde is sedative. Hilde is not thundering.", "logic": "\nManichee(saunder)\nSedative(saunder)\nSuspensive(saunder)\nUnhindered(saunder)\nWhitened(tootsie)\nManichee(tootsie)\nKooky(tootsie)\nSuspensive(tootsie)\nWhitened(hilde)\nManichee(hilde)\nKooky(hilde)\nSedative(hilde)\nSuspensive(hilde)\nManichee(brodie)\nSedative(brodie)\nThundering(brodie)\nUnhindered(saunder) and Manichee(saunder) -> Kooky(saunder)\nforall x (Thundering(x) -> Kooky(x))\nforall x (Whitened(x) and Manichee(x) -> Thundering(x))\nforall x (Kooky(x) -> Suspensive(x))\nforall x (Suspensive(x) and Manichee(x) -> Whitened(x))\nUnhindered(hilde) -> Sedative(hilde)\n\nnot Thundering(hilde)\n\nWhitened(hilde) and Manichee(hilde) and forall x (Whitened(x) and Manichee(x) -> Thundering(x)) -> therefore Thundering(hilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Kissiah is dainty. Kissiah is missed. Kissiah is xlvii. Kissiah is cheering. Sylvia is kookie. Sylvia is dainty. Sylvia is untaped. Sylvia is xlvii. Isaac is kookie. Isaac is dainty. Isaac is untaped. Isaac is missed. Isaac is xlvii. Celia is dainty. Celia is missed. Celia is idealised. If Kissiah is cheering and Kissiah is dainty then Kissiah is untaped. Smart people are untaped. If someone is kookie and dainty then they are idealised. Kind people are xlvii. If someone is xlvii and dainty then they are kookie. If Isaac is cheering then Isaac is missed. Celia is xlvii.", "logic": "\nDainty(kissiah)\nMissed(kissiah)\nXlvii(kissiah)\nCheering(kissiah)\nKookie(sylvia)\nDainty(sylvia)\nUntaped(sylvia)\nXlvii(sylvia)\nKookie(isaac)\nDainty(isaac)\nUntaped(isaac)\nMissed(isaac)\nXlvii(isaac)\nDainty(celia)\nMissed(celia)\nIdealised(celia)\nCheering(kissiah) and Dainty(kissiah) -> Untaped(kissiah)\nforall x (Idealised(x) -> Untaped(x))\nforall x (Kookie(x) and Dainty(x) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Untaped(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and Dainty(x) -> Kookie(x))\nCheering(isaac) -> Missed(isaac)\n\nXlvii(celia)\n\nIdealised(celia) and forall x (Idealised(x) -> Untaped(x)) -> therefore Untaped(celia) Untaped(celia) and forall x (Untaped(x) -> Xlvii(x)) -> therefore Xlvii(celia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Sophia is urinary. Sophia is benefic. Sophia is extricable. Sophia is savoury. Munroe is coarse. Munroe is urinary. Munroe is asinine. Munroe is extricable. Geof is coarse. Geof is urinary. Geof is asinine. Geof is benefic. Geof is extricable. Nikolai is urinary. Nikolai is benefic. Nikolai is pianissimo. If Sophia is savoury and Sophia is urinary then Sophia is asinine. Smart people are asinine. If someone is coarse and urinary then they are pianissimo. Kind people are extricable. If someone is extricable and urinary then they are coarse. If Geof is savoury then Geof is benefic. Nikolai is not extricable.", "logic": "\nUrinary(sophia)\nBenefic(sophia)\nExtricable(sophia)\nSavoury(sophia)\nCoarse(munroe)\nUrinary(munroe)\nAsinine(munroe)\nExtricable(munroe)\nCoarse(geof)\nUrinary(geof)\nAsinine(geof)\nBenefic(geof)\nExtricable(geof)\nUrinary(nikolai)\nBenefic(nikolai)\nPianissimo(nikolai)\nSavoury(sophia) and Urinary(sophia) -> Asinine(sophia)\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Asinine(x))\nforall x (Coarse(x) and Urinary(x) -> Pianissimo(x))\nforall x (Asinine(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and Urinary(x) -> Coarse(x))\nSavoury(geof) -> Benefic(geof)\n\nnot Extricable(nikolai)\n\nPianissimo(nikolai) and forall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Asinine(x)) -> therefore Asinine(nikolai) Asinine(nikolai) and forall x (Asinine(x) -> Extricable(x)) -> therefore Extricable(nikolai)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Ismail is ischemic. Ismail is vulpine. Ismail is bacchic. Ismail is feral. Bobbie is carthusian. Bobbie is ischemic. Bobbie is ammoniac. Bobbie is bacchic. Mureil is carthusian. Mureil is ischemic. Mureil is ammoniac. Mureil is vulpine. Mureil is bacchic. Kurtis is ischemic. Kurtis is vulpine. Kurtis is grasping. If Ismail is feral and Ismail is ischemic then Ismail is ammoniac. Smart people are ammoniac. If someone is carthusian and ischemic then they are grasping. Kind people are bacchic. If someone is bacchic and ischemic then they are carthusian. If Mureil is feral then Mureil is vulpine. Kurtis is carthusian.", "logic": "\nIschemic(ismail)\nVulpine(ismail)\nBacchic(ismail)\nFeral(ismail)\nCarthusian(bobbie)\nIschemic(bobbie)\nAmmoniac(bobbie)\nBacchic(bobbie)\nCarthusian(mureil)\nIschemic(mureil)\nAmmoniac(mureil)\nVulpine(mureil)\nBacchic(mureil)\nIschemic(kurtis)\nVulpine(kurtis)\nGrasping(kurtis)\nFeral(ismail) and Ischemic(ismail) -> Ammoniac(ismail)\nforall x (Grasping(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Carthusian(x) and Ischemic(x) -> Grasping(x))\nforall x (Ammoniac(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Ischemic(x) -> Carthusian(x))\nFeral(mureil) -> Vulpine(mureil)\n\nCarthusian(kurtis)\n\nGrasping(kurtis) and forall x (Grasping(x) -> Ammoniac(x)) -> therefore Ammoniac(kurtis) Ammoniac(kurtis) and forall x (Ammoniac(x) -> Bacchic(x)) -> therefore Bacchic(kurtis) Bacchic(kurtis) and Ischemic(kurtis) and forall x (Bacchic(x) and Ischemic(x) -> Carthusian(x)) -> therefore Carthusian(kurtis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Davidson is relational. Davidson is alchemic. Davidson is shed. Davidson is menstrual. Pen is lengthened. Pen is relational. Pen is erratic. Pen is shed. Madelene is lengthened. Madelene is relational. Madelene is erratic. Madelene is alchemic. Madelene is shed. Heath is relational. Heath is alchemic. Heath is blinded. If Davidson is menstrual and Davidson is relational then Davidson is erratic. Smart people are erratic. If someone is lengthened and relational then they are blinded. Kind people are shed. If someone is shed and relational then they are lengthened. If Madelene is menstrual then Madelene is alchemic. Heath is not lengthened.", "logic": "\nRelational(davidson)\nAlchemic(davidson)\nShed(davidson)\nMenstrual(davidson)\nLengthened(pen)\nRelational(pen)\nErratic(pen)\nShed(pen)\nLengthened(madelene)\nRelational(madelene)\nErratic(madelene)\nAlchemic(madelene)\nShed(madelene)\nRelational(heath)\nAlchemic(heath)\nBlinded(heath)\nMenstrual(davidson) and Relational(davidson) -> Erratic(davidson)\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Erratic(x))\nforall x (Lengthened(x) and Relational(x) -> Blinded(x))\nforall x (Erratic(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) and Relational(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nMenstrual(madelene) -> Alchemic(madelene)\n\nnot Lengthened(heath)\n\nBlinded(heath) and forall x (Blinded(x) -> Erratic(x)) -> therefore Erratic(heath) Erratic(heath) and forall x (Erratic(x) -> Shed(x)) -> therefore Shed(heath) Shed(heath) and Relational(heath) and forall x (Shed(x) and Relational(x) -> Lengthened(x)) -> therefore Lengthened(heath)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Murray is fibrillose. Murray is abatable. Murray is warming. Murray is liberal. Kirbie is ulnar. Kirbie is fibrillose. Kirbie is aversive. Kirbie is warming. Alexi is ulnar. Alexi is fibrillose. Alexi is aversive. Alexi is abatable. Alexi is warming. Dillon is fibrillose. Dillon is abatable. Dillon is plump. If Murray is liberal and Murray is fibrillose then Murray is aversive. Smart people are aversive. If someone is ulnar and fibrillose then they are plump. Kind people are warming. If someone is warming and fibrillose then they are ulnar. If Alexi is liberal then Alexi is abatable. Kirbie is not abatable.", "logic": "\nFibrillose(murray)\nAbatable(murray)\nWarming(murray)\nLiberal(murray)\nUlnar(kirbie)\nFibrillose(kirbie)\nAversive(kirbie)\nWarming(kirbie)\nUlnar(alexi)\nFibrillose(alexi)\nAversive(alexi)\nAbatable(alexi)\nWarming(alexi)\nFibrillose(dillon)\nAbatable(dillon)\nPlump(dillon)\nLiberal(murray) and Fibrillose(murray) -> Aversive(murray)\nforall x (Plump(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) and Fibrillose(x) -> Plump(x))\nforall x (Aversive(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) and Fibrillose(x) -> Ulnar(x))\nLiberal(alexi) -> Abatable(alexi)\n\nnot Abatable(kirbie)\n\nnot Abatable(kirbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Winifield is equanimous. Winifield is statutory. Winifield is punctured. Winifield is seditious. Cathryn is glaucous. Cathryn is equanimous. Cathryn is voracious. Cathryn is punctured. Yard is glaucous. Yard is equanimous. Yard is voracious. Yard is statutory. Yard is punctured. Harald is equanimous. Harald is statutory. Harald is bloodless. If Winifield is seditious and Winifield is equanimous then Winifield is voracious. Smart people are voracious. If someone is glaucous and equanimous then they are bloodless. Kind people are punctured. If someone is punctured and equanimous then they are glaucous. If Yard is seditious then Yard is statutory. Harald is seditious.", "logic": "\nEquanimous(winifield)\nStatutory(winifield)\nPunctured(winifield)\nSeditious(winifield)\nGlaucous(cathryn)\nEquanimous(cathryn)\nVoracious(cathryn)\nPunctured(cathryn)\nGlaucous(yard)\nEquanimous(yard)\nVoracious(yard)\nStatutory(yard)\nPunctured(yard)\nEquanimous(harald)\nStatutory(harald)\nBloodless(harald)\nSeditious(winifield) and Equanimous(winifield) -> Voracious(winifield)\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Voracious(x))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) and Equanimous(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Voracious(x) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Punctured(x) and Equanimous(x) -> Glaucous(x))\nSeditious(yard) -> Statutory(yard)\n\nSeditious(harald)\n\nSeditious(harald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Fernanda is barbecued. Fernanda is nonracial. Fernanda is baking. Fernanda is curly. Didi is sterling. Didi is barbecued. Didi is caudated. Didi is baking. Mignon is sterling. Mignon is barbecued. Mignon is caudated. Mignon is nonracial. Mignon is baking. Maurie is barbecued. Maurie is nonracial. Maurie is voluntary. If Fernanda is curly and Fernanda is barbecued then Fernanda is caudated. Smart people are caudated. If someone is sterling and barbecued then they are voluntary. Kind people are baking. If someone is baking and barbecued then they are sterling. If Mignon is curly then Mignon is nonracial. Didi is not curly.", "logic": "\nBarbecued(fernanda)\nNonracial(fernanda)\nBaking(fernanda)\nCurly(fernanda)\nSterling(didi)\nBarbecued(didi)\nCaudated(didi)\nBaking(didi)\nSterling(mignon)\nBarbecued(mignon)\nCaudated(mignon)\nNonracial(mignon)\nBaking(mignon)\nBarbecued(maurie)\nNonracial(maurie)\nVoluntary(maurie)\nCurly(fernanda) and Barbecued(fernanda) -> Caudated(fernanda)\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Caudated(x))\nforall x (Sterling(x) and Barbecued(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nforall x (Caudated(x) -> Baking(x))\nforall x (Baking(x) and Barbecued(x) -> Sterling(x))\nCurly(mignon) -> Nonracial(mignon)\n\nnot Curly(didi)\n\nnot Curly(didi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Shelley is amendable. Shelley is autarkical. Shelley is selfish. Shelley is nipping. Anet is buttoned. Anet is amendable. Anet is norwegian. Anet is selfish. Trey is buttoned. Trey is amendable. Trey is norwegian. Trey is autarkical. Trey is selfish. Thadeus is amendable. Thadeus is autarkical. Thadeus is ailing. If Shelley is nipping and Shelley is amendable then Shelley is norwegian. Smart people are norwegian. If someone is buttoned and amendable then they are ailing. Kind people are selfish. If someone is selfish and amendable then they are buttoned. If Trey is nipping then Trey is autarkical. Trey is nipping.", "logic": "\nAmendable(shelley)\nAutarkical(shelley)\nSelfish(shelley)\nNipping(shelley)\nButtoned(anet)\nAmendable(anet)\nNorwegian(anet)\nSelfish(anet)\nButtoned(trey)\nAmendable(trey)\nNorwegian(trey)\nAutarkical(trey)\nSelfish(trey)\nAmendable(thadeus)\nAutarkical(thadeus)\nAiling(thadeus)\nNipping(shelley) and Amendable(shelley) -> Norwegian(shelley)\nforall x (Ailing(x) -> Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Buttoned(x) and Amendable(x) -> Ailing(x))\nforall x (Norwegian(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Selfish(x) and Amendable(x) -> Buttoned(x))\nNipping(trey) -> Autarkical(trey)\n\nNipping(trey)\n\nNipping(trey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Merlin is not flagrant. Ailey is not lawless. Carmina is standpat. Joyann is centesimal. If someone is standpat then they are not flagrant. If someone is centesimal then they are not flagrant. Blue people are centesimal. If someone is winless then they are illusional. Kind people are standpat. All lawless, standpat people are not nonlethal. If Joyann is standpat then Joyann is winless. If Merlin is standpat and Merlin is not centesimal then Merlin is illusional. Merlin is not flagrant.", "logic": "\nnot Flagrant(merlin)\nnot Lawless(ailey)\nStandpat(carmina)\nCentesimal(joyann)\nforall x (Standpat(x) -> not Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> not Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Centesimal(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) and Standpat(x) -> not Nonlethal(x))\nStandpat(joyann) -> Winless(joyann)\nStandpat(merlin) and not Centesimal(merlin) -> Illusional(merlin)\n\nnot Flagrant(merlin)\n\ntherefore not Flagrant(merlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Ernest is not minuscule. Carlene is not attendant. Charmaine is analog. Adriena is frank. If someone is analog then they are not minuscule. If someone is frank then they are not minuscule. Blue people are frank. If someone is pretended then they are libellous. Kind people are analog. All attendant, analog people are not sighted. If Adriena is analog then Adriena is pretended. If Ernest is analog and Ernest is not frank then Ernest is libellous. Carlene is attendant.", "logic": "\nnot Minuscule(ernest)\nnot Attendant(carlene)\nAnalog(charmaine)\nFrank(adriena)\nforall x (Analog(x) -> not Minuscule(x))\nforall x (Frank(x) -> not Minuscule(x))\nforall x (Minuscule(x) -> Frank(x))\nforall x (Pretended(x) -> Libellous(x))\nforall x (Frank(x) -> Analog(x))\nforall x (Attendant(x) and Analog(x) -> not Sighted(x))\nAnalog(adriena) -> Pretended(adriena)\nAnalog(ernest) and not Frank(ernest) -> Libellous(ernest)\n\nAttendant(carlene)\n\ntherefore not Attendant(carlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Vance is not reasoning. Elianore is not pallid. Ronny is tabular. Jaine is xxvii. If someone is tabular then they are not reasoning. If someone is xxvii then they are not reasoning. Blue people are xxvii. If someone is backless then they are wide. Kind people are tabular. All pallid, tabular people are not vestibular. If Jaine is tabular then Jaine is backless. If Vance is tabular and Vance is not xxvii then Vance is wide. Jaine is not reasoning.", "logic": "\nnot Reasoning(vance)\nnot Pallid(elianore)\nTabular(ronny)\nXxvii(jaine)\nforall x (Tabular(x) -> not Reasoning(x))\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> not Reasoning(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) -> Xxvii(x))\nforall x (Backless(x) -> Wide(x))\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> Tabular(x))\nforall x (Pallid(x) and Tabular(x) -> not Vestibular(x))\nTabular(jaine) -> Backless(jaine)\nTabular(vance) and not Xxvii(vance) -> Wide(vance)\n\nnot Reasoning(jaine)\n\nXxvii(jaine) and forall x (Xxvii(x) -> not Reasoning(x)) -> therefore not Reasoning(jaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Lamar is not unaddicted. Archy is not washy. Cher is streaky. Juline is dacitic. If someone is streaky then they are not unaddicted. If someone is dacitic then they are not unaddicted. Blue people are dacitic. If someone is bumptious then they are peristylar. Kind people are streaky. All washy, streaky people are not footless. If Juline is streaky then Juline is bumptious. If Lamar is streaky and Lamar is not dacitic then Lamar is peristylar. Juline is not streaky.", "logic": "\nnot Unaddicted(lamar)\nnot Washy(archy)\nStreaky(cher)\nDacitic(juline)\nforall x (Streaky(x) -> not Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Dacitic(x) -> not Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) -> Dacitic(x))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) -> Peristylar(x))\nforall x (Dacitic(x) -> Streaky(x))\nforall x (Washy(x) and Streaky(x) -> not Footless(x))\nStreaky(juline) -> Bumptious(juline)\nStreaky(lamar) and not Dacitic(lamar) -> Peristylar(lamar)\n\nnot Streaky(juline)\n\nDacitic(juline) and forall x (Dacitic(x) -> Streaky(x)) -> therefore Streaky(juline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Pryce is not adulatory. Jay is not coseismal. Huey is uniparous. Minette is wisplike. If someone is uniparous then they are not adulatory. If someone is wisplike then they are not adulatory. Blue people are wisplike. If someone is gambian then they are equivocal. Kind people are uniparous. All coseismal, uniparous people are not canary. If Minette is uniparous then Minette is gambian. If Pryce is uniparous and Pryce is not wisplike then Pryce is equivocal. Minette is gambian.", "logic": "\nnot Adulatory(pryce)\nnot Coseismal(jay)\nUniparous(huey)\nWisplike(minette)\nforall x (Uniparous(x) -> not Adulatory(x))\nforall x (Wisplike(x) -> not Adulatory(x))\nforall x (Adulatory(x) -> Wisplike(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> Equivocal(x))\nforall x (Wisplike(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) and Uniparous(x) -> not Canary(x))\nUniparous(minette) -> Gambian(minette)\nUniparous(pryce) and not Wisplike(pryce) -> Equivocal(pryce)\n\nGambian(minette)\n\nWisplike(minette) and forall x (Wisplike(x) -> Uniparous(x)) -> therefore Uniparous(minette) Uniparous(minette) and Uniparous(minette) -> Gambian(minette) -> therefore Gambian(minette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Livia is not ovine. Heywood is not predacious. Cathee is capped. Preston is nocturnal. If someone is capped then they are not ovine. If someone is nocturnal then they are not ovine. Blue people are nocturnal. If someone is meaty then they are sooty. Kind people are capped. All predacious, capped people are not gleeful. If Preston is capped then Preston is meaty. If Livia is capped and Livia is not nocturnal then Livia is sooty. Preston is not meaty.", "logic": "\nnot Ovine(livia)\nnot Predacious(heywood)\nCapped(cathee)\nNocturnal(preston)\nforall x (Capped(x) -> not Ovine(x))\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) -> not Ovine(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> Nocturnal(x))\nforall x (Meaty(x) -> Sooty(x))\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) -> Capped(x))\nforall x (Predacious(x) and Capped(x) -> not Gleeful(x))\nCapped(preston) -> Meaty(preston)\nCapped(livia) and not Nocturnal(livia) -> Sooty(livia)\n\nnot Meaty(preston)\n\nNocturnal(preston) and forall x (Nocturnal(x) -> Capped(x)) -> therefore Capped(preston) Capped(preston) and Capped(preston) -> Meaty(preston) -> therefore Meaty(preston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Berta is not bistered. Karim is not tailless. Olga is swaybacked. Cynthia is nugatory. If someone is swaybacked then they are not bistered. If someone is nugatory then they are not bistered. Blue people are nugatory. If someone is egoistic then they are nocent. Kind people are swaybacked. All tailless, swaybacked people are not galilaean. If Cynthia is swaybacked then Cynthia is egoistic. If Berta is swaybacked and Berta is not nugatory then Berta is nocent. Cynthia is nocent.", "logic": "\nnot Bistered(berta)\nnot Tailless(karim)\nSwaybacked(olga)\nNugatory(cynthia)\nforall x (Swaybacked(x) -> not Bistered(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> not Bistered(x))\nforall x (Bistered(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Nocent(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\nforall x (Tailless(x) and Swaybacked(x) -> not Galilaean(x))\nSwaybacked(cynthia) -> Egoistic(cynthia)\nSwaybacked(berta) and not Nugatory(berta) -> Nocent(berta)\n\nNocent(cynthia)\n\nNugatory(cynthia) and forall x (Nugatory(x) -> Swaybacked(x)) -> therefore Swaybacked(cynthia) Swaybacked(cynthia) and Swaybacked(cynthia) -> Egoistic(cynthia) -> therefore Egoistic(cynthia) Egoistic(cynthia) and forall x (Egoistic(x) -> Nocent(x)) -> therefore Nocent(cynthia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Karen is not sissified. Arvie is not lossless. Riannon is riled. Isadore is raiding. If someone is riled then they are not sissified. If someone is raiding then they are not sissified. Blue people are raiding. If someone is pastel then they are sensitised. Kind people are riled. All lossless, riled people are not deflective. If Isadore is riled then Isadore is pastel. If Karen is riled and Karen is not raiding then Karen is sensitised. Isadore is not sensitised.", "logic": "\nnot Sissified(karen)\nnot Lossless(arvie)\nRiled(riannon)\nRaiding(isadore)\nforall x (Riled(x) -> not Sissified(x))\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> not Sissified(x))\nforall x (Sissified(x) -> Raiding(x))\nforall x (Pastel(x) -> Sensitised(x))\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Lossless(x) and Riled(x) -> not Deflective(x))\nRiled(isadore) -> Pastel(isadore)\nRiled(karen) and not Raiding(karen) -> Sensitised(karen)\n\nnot Sensitised(isadore)\n\nRaiding(isadore) and forall x (Raiding(x) -> Riled(x)) -> therefore Riled(isadore) Riled(isadore) and Riled(isadore) -> Pastel(isadore) -> therefore Pastel(isadore) Pastel(isadore) and forall x (Pastel(x) -> Sensitised(x)) -> therefore Sensitised(isadore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Caressa is not immature. Abelard is not vestiary. Flem is unrivalled. Rakel is precursory. If someone is unrivalled then they are not immature. If someone is precursory then they are not immature. Blue people are precursory. If someone is velvet then they are unstylish. Kind people are unrivalled. All vestiary, unrivalled people are not terrene. If Rakel is unrivalled then Rakel is velvet. If Caressa is unrivalled and Caressa is not precursory then Caressa is unstylish. Caressa is not precursory.", "logic": "\nnot Immature(caressa)\nnot Vestiary(abelard)\nUnrivalled(flem)\nPrecursory(rakel)\nforall x (Unrivalled(x) -> not Immature(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) -> not Immature(x))\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Velvet(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) -> Unrivalled(x))\nforall x (Vestiary(x) and Unrivalled(x) -> not Terrene(x))\nUnrivalled(rakel) -> Velvet(rakel)\nUnrivalled(caressa) and not Precursory(caressa) -> Unstylish(caressa)\n\nnot Precursory(caressa)\n\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Precursory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Zoe is not pleasing. Cletus is not tenebrious. Randell is oncoming. Doretta is stinging. If someone is oncoming then they are not pleasing. If someone is stinging then they are not pleasing. Blue people are stinging. If someone is tranquil then they are unclouded. Kind people are oncoming. All tenebrious, oncoming people are not bacchic. If Doretta is oncoming then Doretta is tranquil. If Zoe is oncoming and Zoe is not stinging then Zoe is unclouded. Cletus is stinging.", "logic": "\nnot Pleasing(zoe)\nnot Tenebrious(cletus)\nOncoming(randell)\nStinging(doretta)\nforall x (Oncoming(x) -> not Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Stinging(x) -> not Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Stinging(x))\nforall x (Tranquil(x) -> Unclouded(x))\nforall x (Stinging(x) -> Oncoming(x))\nforall x (Tenebrious(x) and Oncoming(x) -> not Bacchic(x))\nOncoming(doretta) -> Tranquil(doretta)\nOncoming(zoe) and not Stinging(zoe) -> Unclouded(zoe)\n\nStinging(cletus)\n\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Stinging(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Gerhardt is not fatal. Ranna is not base. Jeannie is agraphic. Verge is pontifical. If someone is agraphic then they are not fatal. If someone is pontifical then they are not fatal. Blue people are pontifical. If someone is biyearly then they are violent. Kind people are agraphic. All base, agraphic people are not bland. If Verge is agraphic then Verge is biyearly. If Gerhardt is agraphic and Gerhardt is not pontifical then Gerhardt is violent. Gerhardt is not violent.", "logic": "\nnot Fatal(gerhardt)\nnot Base(ranna)\nAgraphic(jeannie)\nPontifical(verge)\nforall x (Agraphic(x) -> not Fatal(x))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> not Fatal(x))\nforall x (Fatal(x) -> Pontifical(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> Violent(x))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> Agraphic(x))\nforall x (Base(x) and Agraphic(x) -> not Bland(x))\nAgraphic(verge) -> Biyearly(verge)\nAgraphic(gerhardt) and not Pontifical(gerhardt) -> Violent(gerhardt)\n\nnot Violent(gerhardt)\n\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> Violent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Claus is not ridiculous. Lindy is not lxxi. Solange is pondering. Trey is cadastral. If someone is pondering then they are not ridiculous. If someone is cadastral then they are not ridiculous. Blue people are cadastral. If someone is gummed then they are lxxxii. Kind people are pondering. All lxxi, pondering people are not jammed. If Trey is pondering then Trey is gummed. If Claus is pondering and Claus is not cadastral then Claus is lxxxii. Solange is lxxxii.", "logic": "\nnot Ridiculous(claus)\nnot Lxxi(lindy)\nPondering(solange)\nCadastral(trey)\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> not Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Cadastral(x) -> not Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Cadastral(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Cadastral(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) and Pondering(x) -> not Jammed(x))\nPondering(trey) -> Gummed(trey)\nPondering(claus) and not Cadastral(claus) -> Lxxxii(claus)\n\nLxxxii(solange)\n\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Lxxxii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Magnum is not calico. Trista is not korean. Horatio is erogenous. Bevvy is beardown. If someone is erogenous then they are not calico. If someone is beardown then they are not calico. Blue people are beardown. If someone is redemptive then they are typical. Kind people are erogenous. All korean, erogenous people are not braided. If Bevvy is erogenous then Bevvy is redemptive. If Magnum is erogenous and Magnum is not beardown then Magnum is typical. Horatio is not redemptive.", "logic": "\nnot Calico(magnum)\nnot Korean(trista)\nErogenous(horatio)\nBeardown(bevvy)\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> not Calico(x))\nforall x (Beardown(x) -> not Calico(x))\nforall x (Calico(x) -> Beardown(x))\nforall x (Redemptive(x) -> Typical(x))\nforall x (Beardown(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Korean(x) and Erogenous(x) -> not Braided(x))\nErogenous(bevvy) -> Redemptive(bevvy)\nErogenous(magnum) and not Beardown(magnum) -> Typical(magnum)\n\nnot Redemptive(horatio)\n\nnot Redemptive(horatio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Renie is not rustic. Alene is not blamable. Sibylle is palpitant. Sully is mastoidal. If someone is palpitant then they are not rustic. If someone is mastoidal then they are not rustic. Blue people are mastoidal. If someone is twinkly then they are angelical. Kind people are palpitant. All blamable, palpitant people are not cometic. If Sully is palpitant then Sully is twinkly. If Renie is palpitant and Renie is not mastoidal then Renie is angelical. Sully is blamable.", "logic": "\nnot Rustic(renie)\nnot Blamable(alene)\nPalpitant(sibylle)\nMastoidal(sully)\nforall x (Palpitant(x) -> not Rustic(x))\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) -> not Rustic(x))\nforall x (Rustic(x) -> Mastoidal(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Blamable(x) and Palpitant(x) -> not Cometic(x))\nPalpitant(sully) -> Twinkly(sully)\nPalpitant(renie) and not Mastoidal(renie) -> Angelical(renie)\n\nBlamable(sully)\n\nBlamable(sully) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Chanda is not lobated. Douglis is not detergent. Kally is burly. Hoyt is reposeful. If someone is burly then they are not lobated. If someone is reposeful then they are not lobated. Blue people are reposeful. If someone is negative then they are negroid. Kind people are burly. All detergent, burly people are not weatherly. If Hoyt is burly then Hoyt is negative. If Chanda is burly and Chanda is not reposeful then Chanda is negroid. Douglis is not negative.", "logic": "\nnot Lobated(chanda)\nnot Detergent(douglis)\nBurly(kally)\nReposeful(hoyt)\nforall x (Burly(x) -> not Lobated(x))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> not Lobated(x))\nforall x (Lobated(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Burly(x))\nforall x (Detergent(x) and Burly(x) -> not Weatherly(x))\nBurly(hoyt) -> Negative(hoyt)\nBurly(chanda) and not Reposeful(chanda) -> Negroid(chanda)\n\nnot Negative(douglis)\n\nnot Negative(douglis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Twyla is not touching. Ingelbert is not preteen. Tony is unarmoured. Charis is acetabular. If someone is unarmoured then they are not touching. If someone is acetabular then they are not touching. Blue people are acetabular. If someone is unlobed then they are fusible. Kind people are unarmoured. All preteen, unarmoured people are not needed. If Charis is unarmoured then Charis is unlobed. If Twyla is unarmoured and Twyla is not acetabular then Twyla is fusible. Tony is needed.", "logic": "\nnot Touching(twyla)\nnot Preteen(ingelbert)\nUnarmoured(tony)\nAcetabular(charis)\nforall x (Unarmoured(x) -> not Touching(x))\nforall x (Acetabular(x) -> not Touching(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Acetabular(x))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) -> Fusible(x))\nforall x (Acetabular(x) -> Unarmoured(x))\nforall x (Preteen(x) and Unarmoured(x) -> not Needed(x))\nUnarmoured(charis) -> Unlobed(charis)\nUnarmoured(twyla) and not Acetabular(twyla) -> Fusible(twyla)\n\nNeeded(tony)\n\nNeeded(tony) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "The elka is pinchbeck. The emmie party the elka. The cobbie postpose the elka. The cortese party the elka. If someone party the cobbie then the cobbie is not sinhalese. If someone saddle the cobbie then they do not like the elka. All pinchbeck people are reformable. If someone party the elka and the elka party the cobbie then they see the cortese. If someone postpose the elka and the elka is not hoggish then they do not like the emmie. If someone is pinchbeck then they like the emmie. If the cortese party the elka and the elka is reformable then the elka saddle the cobbie. If someone postpose the elka then the elka is sinhalese. The cortese party the elka.", "logic": "\nPinchbeck(elka)\nParty(emmie, elka)\nPostpose(cobbie, elka)\nParty(cortese, elka)\nforall x (Party(x, cobbie) -> not Sinhalese(cobbie))\nforall x (Saddle(x, cobbie) -> not Postpose(x, elka))\nforall x (Pinchbeck(x) -> Reformable(x))\nforall x (Party(x, elka) and Party(elka, cobbie) -> Saddle(x, cortese))\nforall x (Postpose(x, elka) and not Hoggish(elka) -> not Postpose(x, emmie))\nforall x (Pinchbeck(x) -> Postpose(x, emmie))\nParty(cortese, elka) and Reformable(elka) -> Saddle(elka, cobbie)\nforall x (Postpose(x, elka) -> Sinhalese(elka))\n\nParty(cortese, elka)\n\ntherefore Party(cortese, elka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The constance is cxxv. The corabel itch the constance. The margalo disabuse the constance. The mela itch the constance. If someone itch the margalo then the margalo is not flaming. If someone narrate the margalo then they do not like the constance. All cxxv people are palmy. If someone itch the constance and the constance itch the margalo then they see the mela. If someone disabuse the constance and the constance is not peruvian then they do not like the corabel. If someone is cxxv then they like the corabel. If the mela itch the constance and the constance is palmy then the constance narrate the margalo. If someone disabuse the constance then the constance is flaming. The mela does not chase the constance.", "logic": "\nCxxv(constance)\nItch(corabel, constance)\nDisabuse(margalo, constance)\nItch(mela, constance)\nforall x (Itch(x, margalo) -> not Flaming(margalo))\nforall x (Narrate(x, margalo) -> not Disabuse(x, constance))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Palmy(x))\nforall x (Itch(x, constance) and Itch(constance, margalo) -> Narrate(x, mela))\nforall x (Disabuse(x, constance) and not Peruvian(constance) -> not Disabuse(x, corabel))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Disabuse(x, corabel))\nItch(mela, constance) and Palmy(constance) -> Narrate(constance, margalo)\nforall x (Disabuse(x, constance) -> Flaming(constance))\n\nnot Itch(mela, constance)\n\ntherefore Itch(mela, constance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The andros is cloistral. The debra funk the andros. The justin unwire the andros. The ellissa funk the andros. If someone funk the justin then the justin is not stubby. If someone negotiate the justin then they do not like the andros. All cloistral people are unloving. If someone funk the andros and the andros funk the justin then they see the ellissa. If someone unwire the andros and the andros is not expiable then they do not like the debra. If someone is cloistral then they like the debra. If the ellissa funk the andros and the andros is unloving then the andros negotiate the justin. If someone unwire the andros then the andros is stubby. The andros is unloving.", "logic": "\nCloistral(andros)\nFunk(debra, andros)\nUnwire(justin, andros)\nFunk(ellissa, andros)\nforall x (Funk(x, justin) -> not Stubby(justin))\nforall x (Negotiate(x, justin) -> not Unwire(x, andros))\nforall x (Cloistral(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Funk(x, andros) and Funk(andros, justin) -> Negotiate(x, ellissa))\nforall x (Unwire(x, andros) and not Expiable(andros) -> not Unwire(x, debra))\nforall x (Cloistral(x) -> Unwire(x, debra))\nFunk(ellissa, andros) and Unloving(andros) -> Negotiate(andros, justin)\nforall x (Unwire(x, andros) -> Stubby(andros))\n\nUnloving(andros)\n\nCloistral(andros) and forall x (Cloistral(x) -> Unloving(x)) -> therefore Unloving(andros)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The dian is reported. The matty perpetuate the dian. The lorelei vitrify the dian. The tate perpetuate the dian. If someone perpetuate the lorelei then the lorelei is not recovered. If someone sidle the lorelei then they do not like the dian. All reported people are raging. If someone perpetuate the dian and the dian perpetuate the lorelei then they see the tate. If someone vitrify the dian and the dian is not mercantile then they do not like the matty. If someone is reported then they like the matty. If the tate perpetuate the dian and the dian is raging then the dian sidle the lorelei. If someone vitrify the dian then the dian is recovered. The dian is not raging.", "logic": "\nReported(dian)\nPerpetuate(matty, dian)\nVitrify(lorelei, dian)\nPerpetuate(tate, dian)\nforall x (Perpetuate(x, lorelei) -> not Recovered(lorelei))\nforall x (Sidle(x, lorelei) -> not Vitrify(x, dian))\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Raging(x))\nforall x (Perpetuate(x, dian) and Perpetuate(dian, lorelei) -> Sidle(x, tate))\nforall x (Vitrify(x, dian) and not Mercantile(dian) -> not Vitrify(x, matty))\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Vitrify(x, matty))\nPerpetuate(tate, dian) and Raging(dian) -> Sidle(dian, lorelei)\nforall x (Vitrify(x, dian) -> Recovered(dian))\n\nnot Raging(dian)\n\nReported(dian) and forall x (Reported(x) -> Raging(x)) -> therefore Raging(dian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The paton is unservile. The elberta outflank the paton. The fiorenze truncate the paton. The hamlen outflank the paton. If someone outflank the fiorenze then the fiorenze is not querulous. If someone shrink the fiorenze then they do not like the paton. All unservile people are backless. If someone outflank the paton and the paton outflank the fiorenze then they see the hamlen. If someone truncate the paton and the paton is not incoherent then they do not like the elberta. If someone is unservile then they like the elberta. If the hamlen outflank the paton and the paton is backless then the paton shrink the fiorenze. If someone truncate the paton then the paton is querulous. The paton shrink the fiorenze.", "logic": "\nUnservile(paton)\nOutflank(elberta, paton)\nTruncate(fiorenze, paton)\nOutflank(hamlen, paton)\nforall x (Outflank(x, fiorenze) -> not Querulous(fiorenze))\nforall x (Shrink(x, fiorenze) -> not Truncate(x, paton))\nforall x (Unservile(x) -> Backless(x))\nforall x (Outflank(x, paton) and Outflank(paton, fiorenze) -> Shrink(x, hamlen))\nforall x (Truncate(x, paton) and not Incoherent(paton) -> not Truncate(x, elberta))\nforall x (Unservile(x) -> Truncate(x, elberta))\nOutflank(hamlen, paton) and Backless(paton) -> Shrink(paton, fiorenze)\nforall x (Truncate(x, paton) -> Querulous(paton))\n\nShrink(paton, fiorenze)\n\nUnservile(paton) and forall x (Unservile(x) -> Backless(x)) -> therefore Backless(paton) Outflank(hamlen, paton) and Backless(paton) and Outflank(hamlen, paton) and Backless(paton) -> Shrink(paton, fiorenze) -> therefore Shrink(paton, fiorenze)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The ginnie is comfy. The addis browbeat the ginnie. The adorne fink the ginnie. The gilberto browbeat the ginnie. If someone browbeat the adorne then the adorne is not dicey. If someone slenderise the adorne then they do not like the ginnie. All comfy people are spermatic. If someone browbeat the ginnie and the ginnie browbeat the adorne then they see the gilberto. If someone fink the ginnie and the ginnie is not brownish then they do not like the addis. If someone is comfy then they like the addis. If the gilberto browbeat the ginnie and the ginnie is spermatic then the ginnie slenderise the adorne. If someone fink the ginnie then the ginnie is dicey. The ginnie does not see the adorne.", "logic": "\nComfy(ginnie)\nBrowbeat(addis, ginnie)\nFink(adorne, ginnie)\nBrowbeat(gilberto, ginnie)\nforall x (Browbeat(x, adorne) -> not Dicey(adorne))\nforall x (Slenderise(x, adorne) -> not Fink(x, ginnie))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Spermatic(x))\nforall x (Browbeat(x, ginnie) and Browbeat(ginnie, adorne) -> Slenderise(x, gilberto))\nforall x (Fink(x, ginnie) and not Brownish(ginnie) -> not Fink(x, addis))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Fink(x, addis))\nBrowbeat(gilberto, ginnie) and Spermatic(ginnie) -> Slenderise(ginnie, adorne)\nforall x (Fink(x, ginnie) -> Dicey(ginnie))\n\nnot Slenderise(ginnie, adorne)\n\nComfy(ginnie) and forall x (Comfy(x) -> Spermatic(x)) -> therefore Spermatic(ginnie) Browbeat(gilberto, ginnie) and Spermatic(ginnie) and Browbeat(gilberto, ginnie) and Spermatic(ginnie) -> Slenderise(ginnie, adorne) -> therefore Slenderise(ginnie, adorne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The saxon is bearing. The pattie presage the saxon. The silvanus drool the saxon. The lucila presage the saxon. If someone presage the silvanus then the silvanus is not vinegary. If someone personify the silvanus then they do not like the saxon. All bearing people are zonary. If someone presage the saxon and the saxon presage the silvanus then they see the lucila. If someone drool the saxon and the saxon is not homologic then they do not like the pattie. If someone is bearing then they like the pattie. If the lucila presage the saxon and the saxon is zonary then the saxon personify the silvanus. If someone drool the saxon then the saxon is vinegary. The saxon does not like the saxon.", "logic": "\nBearing(saxon)\nPresage(pattie, saxon)\nDrool(silvanus, saxon)\nPresage(lucila, saxon)\nforall x (Presage(x, silvanus) -> not Vinegary(silvanus))\nforall x (Personify(x, silvanus) -> not Drool(x, saxon))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Zonary(x))\nforall x (Presage(x, saxon) and Presage(saxon, silvanus) -> Personify(x, lucila))\nforall x (Drool(x, saxon) and not Homologic(saxon) -> not Drool(x, pattie))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Drool(x, pattie))\nPresage(lucila, saxon) and Zonary(saxon) -> Personify(saxon, silvanus)\nforall x (Drool(x, saxon) -> Vinegary(saxon))\n\nnot Drool(saxon, saxon)\n\nBearing(saxon) and forall x (Bearing(x) -> Zonary(x)) -> therefore Zonary(saxon) Presage(lucila, saxon) and Zonary(saxon) and Presage(lucila, saxon) and Zonary(saxon) -> Personify(saxon, silvanus) -> therefore Personify(saxon, silvanus) Personify(saxon, silvanus) and forall x (Personify(x, silvanus) -> not Drool(x, saxon)) -> therefore not Drool(saxon, saxon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The milly is unfertile. The happy respect the milly. The ariela spondaize the milly. The grant respect the milly. If someone respect the ariela then the ariela is not rainproof. If someone desquamate the ariela then they do not like the milly. All unfertile people are centered. If someone respect the milly and the milly respect the ariela then they see the grant. If someone spondaize the milly and the milly is not spiritual then they do not like the happy. If someone is unfertile then they like the happy. If the grant respect the milly and the milly is centered then the milly desquamate the ariela. If someone spondaize the milly then the milly is rainproof. The milly spondaize the milly.", "logic": "\nUnfertile(milly)\nRespect(happy, milly)\nSpondaize(ariela, milly)\nRespect(grant, milly)\nforall x (Respect(x, ariela) -> not Rainproof(ariela))\nforall x (Desquamate(x, ariela) -> not Spondaize(x, milly))\nforall x (Unfertile(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Respect(x, milly) and Respect(milly, ariela) -> Desquamate(x, grant))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, milly) and not Spiritual(milly) -> not Spondaize(x, happy))\nforall x (Unfertile(x) -> Spondaize(x, happy))\nRespect(grant, milly) and Centered(milly) -> Desquamate(milly, ariela)\nforall x (Spondaize(x, milly) -> Rainproof(milly))\n\nSpondaize(milly, milly)\n\nUnfertile(milly) and forall x (Unfertile(x) -> Centered(x)) -> therefore Centered(milly) Respect(grant, milly) and Centered(milly) and Respect(grant, milly) and Centered(milly) -> Desquamate(milly, ariela) -> therefore Desquamate(milly, ariela) Desquamate(milly, ariela) and forall x (Desquamate(x, ariela) -> not Spondaize(x, milly)) -> therefore not Spondaize(milly, milly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The maxie is corded. The wadsworth nazify the maxie. The filia taste the maxie. The vitia nazify the maxie. If someone nazify the filia then the filia is not cantering. If someone aspire the filia then they do not like the maxie. All corded people are decurved. If someone nazify the maxie and the maxie nazify the filia then they see the vitia. If someone taste the maxie and the maxie is not armed then they do not like the wadsworth. If someone is corded then they like the wadsworth. If the vitia nazify the maxie and the maxie is decurved then the maxie aspire the filia. If someone taste the maxie then the maxie is cantering. The wadsworth is not decurved.", "logic": "\nCorded(maxie)\nNazify(wadsworth, maxie)\nTaste(filia, maxie)\nNazify(vitia, maxie)\nforall x (Nazify(x, filia) -> not Cantering(filia))\nforall x (Aspire(x, filia) -> not Taste(x, maxie))\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Nazify(x, maxie) and Nazify(maxie, filia) -> Aspire(x, vitia))\nforall x (Taste(x, maxie) and not Armed(maxie) -> not Taste(x, wadsworth))\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Taste(x, wadsworth))\nNazify(vitia, maxie) and Decurved(maxie) -> Aspire(maxie, filia)\nforall x (Taste(x, maxie) -> Cantering(maxie))\n\nnot Decurved(wadsworth)\n\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Decurved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The rosalia is fagged. The edwin dialyze the rosalia. The lonnie debark the rosalia. The adriana dialyze the rosalia. If someone dialyze the lonnie then the lonnie is not fugitive. If someone bellylaugh the lonnie then they do not like the rosalia. All fagged people are tantamount. If someone dialyze the rosalia and the rosalia dialyze the lonnie then they see the adriana. If someone debark the rosalia and the rosalia is not moldovan then they do not like the edwin. If someone is fagged then they like the edwin. If the adriana dialyze the rosalia and the rosalia is tantamount then the rosalia bellylaugh the lonnie. If someone debark the rosalia then the rosalia is fugitive. The lonnie debark the edwin.", "logic": "\nFagged(rosalia)\nDialyze(edwin, rosalia)\nDebark(lonnie, rosalia)\nDialyze(adriana, rosalia)\nforall x (Dialyze(x, lonnie) -> not Fugitive(lonnie))\nforall x (Bellylaugh(x, lonnie) -> not Debark(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Fagged(x) -> Tantamount(x))\nforall x (Dialyze(x, rosalia) and Dialyze(rosalia, lonnie) -> Bellylaugh(x, adriana))\nforall x (Debark(x, rosalia) and not Moldovan(rosalia) -> not Debark(x, edwin))\nforall x (Fagged(x) -> Debark(x, edwin))\nDialyze(adriana, rosalia) and Tantamount(rosalia) -> Bellylaugh(rosalia, lonnie)\nforall x (Debark(x, rosalia) -> Fugitive(rosalia))\n\nDebark(lonnie, edwin)\n\nforall x (Fagged(x) -> Debark(x, edwin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The clarette is decayable. The ricardo burthen the clarette. The yankee snowball the clarette. The clarita burthen the clarette. If someone burthen the yankee then the yankee is not affixal. If someone recommit the yankee then they do not like the clarette. All decayable people are sculptural. If someone burthen the clarette and the clarette burthen the yankee then they see the clarita. If someone snowball the clarette and the clarette is not gruff then they do not like the ricardo. If someone is decayable then they like the ricardo. If the clarita burthen the clarette and the clarette is sculptural then the clarette recommit the yankee. If someone snowball the clarette then the clarette is affixal. The clarita does not see the clarita.", "logic": "\nDecayable(clarette)\nBurthen(ricardo, clarette)\nSnowball(yankee, clarette)\nBurthen(clarita, clarette)\nforall x (Burthen(x, yankee) -> not Affixal(yankee))\nforall x (Recommit(x, yankee) -> not Snowball(x, clarette))\nforall x (Decayable(x) -> Sculptural(x))\nforall x (Burthen(x, clarette) and Burthen(clarette, yankee) -> Recommit(x, clarita))\nforall x (Snowball(x, clarette) and not Gruff(clarette) -> not Snowball(x, ricardo))\nforall x (Decayable(x) -> Snowball(x, ricardo))\nBurthen(clarita, clarette) and Sculptural(clarette) -> Recommit(clarette, yankee)\nforall x (Snowball(x, clarette) -> Affixal(clarette))\n\nnot Recommit(clarita, clarita)\n\nforall x (Burthen(x, clarette) and Burthen(clarette, yankee) -> Recommit(x, clarita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The arleen is quizzical. The rosina oblige the arleen. The shepherd abridge the arleen. The pamela oblige the arleen. If someone oblige the shepherd then the shepherd is not scrubbed. If someone skulk the shepherd then they do not like the arleen. All quizzical people are paved. If someone oblige the arleen and the arleen oblige the shepherd then they see the pamela. If someone abridge the arleen and the arleen is not chilly then they do not like the rosina. If someone is quizzical then they like the rosina. If the pamela oblige the arleen and the arleen is paved then the arleen skulk the shepherd. If someone abridge the arleen then the arleen is scrubbed. The shepherd is paved.", "logic": "\nQuizzical(arleen)\nOblige(rosina, arleen)\nAbridge(shepherd, arleen)\nOblige(pamela, arleen)\nforall x (Oblige(x, shepherd) -> not Scrubbed(shepherd))\nforall x (Skulk(x, shepherd) -> not Abridge(x, arleen))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Paved(x))\nforall x (Oblige(x, arleen) and Oblige(arleen, shepherd) -> Skulk(x, pamela))\nforall x (Abridge(x, arleen) and not Chilly(arleen) -> not Abridge(x, rosina))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Abridge(x, rosina))\nOblige(pamela, arleen) and Paved(arleen) -> Skulk(arleen, shepherd)\nforall x (Abridge(x, arleen) -> Scrubbed(arleen))\n\nPaved(shepherd)\n\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Paved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The krystal is moderne. The charla mess the krystal. The tracie hitchhike the krystal. The pearce mess the krystal. If someone mess the tracie then the tracie is not carroty. If someone negate the tracie then they do not like the krystal. All moderne people are apostolic. If someone mess the krystal and the krystal mess the tracie then they see the pearce. If someone hitchhike the krystal and the krystal is not copious then they do not like the charla. If someone is moderne then they like the charla. If the pearce mess the krystal and the krystal is apostolic then the krystal negate the tracie. If someone hitchhike the krystal then the krystal is carroty. The charla does not chase the charla.", "logic": "\nModerne(krystal)\nMess(charla, krystal)\nHitchhike(tracie, krystal)\nMess(pearce, krystal)\nforall x (Mess(x, tracie) -> not Carroty(tracie))\nforall x (Negate(x, tracie) -> not Hitchhike(x, krystal))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Apostolic(x))\nforall x (Mess(x, krystal) and Mess(krystal, tracie) -> Negate(x, pearce))\nforall x (Hitchhike(x, krystal) and not Copious(krystal) -> not Hitchhike(x, charla))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Hitchhike(x, charla))\nMess(pearce, krystal) and Apostolic(krystal) -> Negate(krystal, tracie)\nforall x (Hitchhike(x, krystal) -> Carroty(krystal))\n\nnot Mess(charla, charla)\n\nnot Mess(charla, charla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The lucky is romaic. The antin parody the lucky. The ailey refreshen the lucky. The osmund parody the lucky. If someone parody the ailey then the ailey is not dutch. If someone isomerise the ailey then they do not like the lucky. All romaic people are puffed. If someone parody the lucky and the lucky parody the ailey then they see the osmund. If someone refreshen the lucky and the lucky is not checkered then they do not like the antin. If someone is romaic then they like the antin. If the osmund parody the lucky and the lucky is puffed then the lucky isomerise the ailey. If someone refreshen the lucky then the lucky is dutch. The lucky parody the antin.", "logic": "\nRomaic(lucky)\nParody(antin, lucky)\nRefreshen(ailey, lucky)\nParody(osmund, lucky)\nforall x (Parody(x, ailey) -> not Dutch(ailey))\nforall x (Isomerise(x, ailey) -> not Refreshen(x, lucky))\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> Puffed(x))\nforall x (Parody(x, lucky) and Parody(lucky, ailey) -> Isomerise(x, osmund))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, lucky) and not Checkered(lucky) -> not Refreshen(x, antin))\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> Refreshen(x, antin))\nParody(osmund, lucky) and Puffed(lucky) -> Isomerise(lucky, ailey)\nforall x (Refreshen(x, lucky) -> Dutch(lucky))\n\nParody(lucky, antin)\n\nParody(lucky, antin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The adey is caller. The brena disqualify the adey. The misty sink the adey. The ricca disqualify the adey. If someone disqualify the misty then the misty is not heathen. If someone quilt the misty then they do not like the adey. All caller people are bulbous. If someone disqualify the adey and the adey disqualify the misty then they see the ricca. If someone sink the adey and the adey is not soviet then they do not like the brena. If someone is caller then they like the brena. If the ricca disqualify the adey and the adey is bulbous then the adey quilt the misty. If someone sink the adey then the adey is heathen. The misty is not soviet.", "logic": "\nCaller(adey)\nDisqualify(brena, adey)\nSink(misty, adey)\nDisqualify(ricca, adey)\nforall x (Disqualify(x, misty) -> not Heathen(misty))\nforall x (Quilt(x, misty) -> not Sink(x, adey))\nforall x (Caller(x) -> Bulbous(x))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, adey) and Disqualify(adey, misty) -> Quilt(x, ricca))\nforall x (Sink(x, adey) and not Soviet(adey) -> not Sink(x, brena))\nforall x (Caller(x) -> Sink(x, brena))\nDisqualify(ricca, adey) and Bulbous(adey) -> Quilt(adey, misty)\nforall x (Sink(x, adey) -> Heathen(adey))\n\nnot Soviet(misty)\n\nnot Soviet(misty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The sybyl is ventral. The giavani wade the sybyl. The katee sour the sybyl. The lucretia wade the sybyl. If someone wade the katee then the katee is not impellent. If someone mosey the katee then they do not like the sybyl. All ventral people are exoteric. If someone wade the sybyl and the sybyl wade the katee then they see the lucretia. If someone sour the sybyl and the sybyl is not chelonian then they do not like the giavani. If someone is ventral then they like the giavani. If the lucretia wade the sybyl and the sybyl is exoteric then the sybyl mosey the katee. If someone sour the sybyl then the sybyl is impellent. The lucretia sour the sybyl.", "logic": "\nVentral(sybyl)\nWade(giavani, sybyl)\nSour(katee, sybyl)\nWade(lucretia, sybyl)\nforall x (Wade(x, katee) -> not Impellent(katee))\nforall x (Mosey(x, katee) -> not Sour(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Ventral(x) -> Exoteric(x))\nforall x (Wade(x, sybyl) and Wade(sybyl, katee) -> Mosey(x, lucretia))\nforall x (Sour(x, sybyl) and not Chelonian(sybyl) -> not Sour(x, giavani))\nforall x (Ventral(x) -> Sour(x, giavani))\nWade(lucretia, sybyl) and Exoteric(sybyl) -> Mosey(sybyl, katee)\nforall x (Sour(x, sybyl) -> Impellent(sybyl))\n\nSour(lucretia, sybyl)\n\nSour(lucretia, sybyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The odille is tactual. The hervey is unsound. If someone is unsound then they need the odille. If someone estivate the odille then the odille is ursine. If someone estivate the odille then the odille is unsound. If someone tear the odille and the odille tear the hervey then the hervey is ursine. If someone is tactual and they chase the hervey then they do not chase the odille. If someone tear the odille and the odille is measured then they see the hervey. The hervey is unsound.", "logic": "\nTactual(odille)\nUnsound(hervey)\nforall x (Unsound(x) -> Estivate(x, odille))\nforall x (Estivate(x, odille) -> Ursine(odille))\nforall x (Estivate(x, odille) -> Unsound(odille))\nforall x (Tear(x, odille) and Tear(odille, hervey) -> Ursine(hervey))\nforall x (Tactual(x) and Tear(x, hervey) -> not Tear(x, odille))\nforall x (Tear(x, odille) and Measured(odille) -> Overlook(x, hervey))\n\nUnsound(hervey)\n\ntherefore Unsound(hervey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The rees is thirtieth. The valentia is dabbled. If someone is dabbled then they need the rees. If someone collocate the rees then the rees is iffy. If someone collocate the rees then the rees is dabbled. If someone bridge the rees and the rees bridge the valentia then the valentia is iffy. If someone is thirtieth and they chase the valentia then they do not chase the rees. If someone bridge the rees and the rees is logistic then they see the valentia. The valentia is not dabbled.", "logic": "\nThirtieth(rees)\nDabbled(valentia)\nforall x (Dabbled(x) -> Collocate(x, rees))\nforall x (Collocate(x, rees) -> Iffy(rees))\nforall x (Collocate(x, rees) -> Dabbled(rees))\nforall x (Bridge(x, rees) and Bridge(rees, valentia) -> Iffy(valentia))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Bridge(x, valentia) -> not Bridge(x, rees))\nforall x (Bridge(x, rees) and Logistic(rees) -> Pasture(x, valentia))\n\nnot Dabbled(valentia)\n\ntherefore Dabbled(valentia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The nevsa is unheated. The bryant is hearable. If someone is hearable then they need the nevsa. If someone dinge the nevsa then the nevsa is lowland. If someone dinge the nevsa then the nevsa is hearable. If someone deodorize the nevsa and the nevsa deodorize the bryant then the bryant is lowland. If someone is unheated and they chase the bryant then they do not chase the nevsa. If someone deodorize the nevsa and the nevsa is cushioned then they see the bryant. The bryant dinge the nevsa.", "logic": "\nUnheated(nevsa)\nHearable(bryant)\nforall x (Hearable(x) -> Dinge(x, nevsa))\nforall x (Dinge(x, nevsa) -> Lowland(nevsa))\nforall x (Dinge(x, nevsa) -> Hearable(nevsa))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, nevsa) and Deodorize(nevsa, bryant) -> Lowland(bryant))\nforall x (Unheated(x) and Deodorize(x, bryant) -> not Deodorize(x, nevsa))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, nevsa) and Cushioned(nevsa) -> Sprain(x, bryant))\n\nDinge(bryant, nevsa)\n\nHearable(bryant) and forall x (Hearable(x) -> Dinge(x, nevsa)) -> therefore Dinge(bryant, nevsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The salvatore is terrified. The penni is unjointed. If someone is unjointed then they need the salvatore. If someone hybridize the salvatore then the salvatore is bland. If someone hybridize the salvatore then the salvatore is unjointed. If someone conk the salvatore and the salvatore conk the penni then the penni is bland. If someone is terrified and they chase the penni then they do not chase the salvatore. If someone conk the salvatore and the salvatore is bottomless then they see the penni. The penni does not need the salvatore.", "logic": "\nTerrified(salvatore)\nUnjointed(penni)\nforall x (Unjointed(x) -> Hybridize(x, salvatore))\nforall x (Hybridize(x, salvatore) -> Bland(salvatore))\nforall x (Hybridize(x, salvatore) -> Unjointed(salvatore))\nforall x (Conk(x, salvatore) and Conk(salvatore, penni) -> Bland(penni))\nforall x (Terrified(x) and Conk(x, penni) -> not Conk(x, salvatore))\nforall x (Conk(x, salvatore) and Bottomless(salvatore) -> Impugn(x, penni))\n\nnot Hybridize(penni, salvatore)\n\nUnjointed(penni) and forall x (Unjointed(x) -> Hybridize(x, salvatore)) -> therefore Hybridize(penni, salvatore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The torrie is saute. The alta is untenable. If someone is untenable then they need the torrie. If someone empower the torrie then the torrie is tempering. If someone empower the torrie then the torrie is untenable. If someone stalk the torrie and the torrie stalk the alta then the alta is tempering. If someone is saute and they chase the alta then they do not chase the torrie. If someone stalk the torrie and the torrie is hyperopic then they see the alta. The torrie is untenable.", "logic": "\nSaute(torrie)\nUntenable(alta)\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> Empower(x, torrie))\nforall x (Empower(x, torrie) -> Tempering(torrie))\nforall x (Empower(x, torrie) -> Untenable(torrie))\nforall x (Stalk(x, torrie) and Stalk(torrie, alta) -> Tempering(alta))\nforall x (Saute(x) and Stalk(x, alta) -> not Stalk(x, torrie))\nforall x (Stalk(x, torrie) and Hyperopic(torrie) -> Assonate(x, alta))\n\nUntenable(torrie)\n\nUntenable(alta) and forall x (Untenable(x) -> Empower(x, torrie)) -> therefore Empower(alta, torrie) Empower(alta, torrie) and forall x (Empower(x, torrie) -> Untenable(torrie)) -> therefore Untenable(torrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The kitty is nubbly. The fay is normal. If someone is normal then they need the kitty. If someone refit the kitty then the kitty is untucked. If someone refit the kitty then the kitty is normal. If someone dissuade the kitty and the kitty dissuade the fay then the fay is untucked. If someone is nubbly and they chase the fay then they do not chase the kitty. If someone dissuade the kitty and the kitty is biotitic then they see the fay. The kitty is not untucked.", "logic": "\nNubbly(kitty)\nNormal(fay)\nforall x (Normal(x) -> Refit(x, kitty))\nforall x (Refit(x, kitty) -> Untucked(kitty))\nforall x (Refit(x, kitty) -> Normal(kitty))\nforall x (Dissuade(x, kitty) and Dissuade(kitty, fay) -> Untucked(fay))\nforall x (Nubbly(x) and Dissuade(x, fay) -> not Dissuade(x, kitty))\nforall x (Dissuade(x, kitty) and Biotitic(kitty) -> Halloo(x, fay))\n\nnot Untucked(kitty)\n\nNormal(fay) and forall x (Normal(x) -> Refit(x, kitty)) -> therefore Refit(fay, kitty) Refit(fay, kitty) and forall x (Refit(x, kitty) -> Untucked(kitty)) -> therefore Untucked(kitty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The erica is placid. The ferdinand is elect. If someone is elect then they need the erica. If someone covenant the erica then the erica is vigilant. If someone covenant the erica then the erica is elect. If someone center the erica and the erica center the ferdinand then the ferdinand is vigilant. If someone is placid and they chase the ferdinand then they do not chase the erica. If someone center the erica and the erica is precarious then they see the ferdinand. The erica covenant the erica.", "logic": "\nPlacid(erica)\nElect(ferdinand)\nforall x (Elect(x) -> Covenant(x, erica))\nforall x (Covenant(x, erica) -> Vigilant(erica))\nforall x (Covenant(x, erica) -> Elect(erica))\nforall x (Center(x, erica) and Center(erica, ferdinand) -> Vigilant(ferdinand))\nforall x (Placid(x) and Center(x, ferdinand) -> not Center(x, erica))\nforall x (Center(x, erica) and Precarious(erica) -> Wage(x, ferdinand))\n\nCovenant(erica, erica)\n\nElect(ferdinand) and forall x (Elect(x) -> Covenant(x, erica)) -> therefore Covenant(ferdinand, erica) Covenant(ferdinand, erica) and forall x (Covenant(x, erica) -> Elect(erica)) -> therefore Elect(erica) Elect(erica) and forall x (Elect(x) -> Covenant(x, erica)) -> therefore Covenant(erica, erica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The emeline is arcane. The kore is thinned. If someone is thinned then they need the emeline. If someone indicate the emeline then the emeline is agonadal. If someone indicate the emeline then the emeline is thinned. If someone exculpate the emeline and the emeline exculpate the kore then the kore is agonadal. If someone is arcane and they chase the kore then they do not chase the emeline. If someone exculpate the emeline and the emeline is yankee then they see the kore. The emeline does not need the emeline.", "logic": "\nArcane(emeline)\nThinned(kore)\nforall x (Thinned(x) -> Indicate(x, emeline))\nforall x (Indicate(x, emeline) -> Agonadal(emeline))\nforall x (Indicate(x, emeline) -> Thinned(emeline))\nforall x (Exculpate(x, emeline) and Exculpate(emeline, kore) -> Agonadal(kore))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Exculpate(x, kore) -> not Exculpate(x, emeline))\nforall x (Exculpate(x, emeline) and Yankee(emeline) -> Chemisorb(x, kore))\n\nnot Indicate(emeline, emeline)\n\nThinned(kore) and forall x (Thinned(x) -> Indicate(x, emeline)) -> therefore Indicate(kore, emeline) Indicate(kore, emeline) and forall x (Indicate(x, emeline) -> Thinned(emeline)) -> therefore Thinned(emeline) Thinned(emeline) and forall x (Thinned(x) -> Indicate(x, emeline)) -> therefore Indicate(emeline, emeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The euphemia is trustful. The marketa is unquiet. If someone is unquiet then they need the euphemia. If someone calcimine the euphemia then the euphemia is unpleasing. If someone calcimine the euphemia then the euphemia is unquiet. If someone corrode the euphemia and the euphemia corrode the marketa then the marketa is unpleasing. If someone is trustful and they chase the marketa then they do not chase the euphemia. If someone corrode the euphemia and the euphemia is corporate then they see the marketa. The marketa is not unpleasing.", "logic": "\nTrustful(euphemia)\nUnquiet(marketa)\nforall x (Unquiet(x) -> Calcimine(x, euphemia))\nforall x (Calcimine(x, euphemia) -> Unpleasing(euphemia))\nforall x (Calcimine(x, euphemia) -> Unquiet(euphemia))\nforall x (Corrode(x, euphemia) and Corrode(euphemia, marketa) -> Unpleasing(marketa))\nforall x (Trustful(x) and Corrode(x, marketa) -> not Corrode(x, euphemia))\nforall x (Corrode(x, euphemia) and Corporate(euphemia) -> Outrank(x, marketa))\n\nnot Unpleasing(marketa)\n\nforall x (Corrode(x, euphemia) and Corrode(euphemia, marketa) -> Unpleasing(marketa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The faye is marauding. The wileen is connected. If someone is connected then they need the faye. If someone auscultate the faye then the faye is concurrent. If someone auscultate the faye then the faye is connected. If someone sink the faye and the faye sink the wileen then the wileen is concurrent. If someone is marauding and they chase the wileen then they do not chase the faye. If someone sink the faye and the faye is discontent then they see the wileen. The faye mail the wileen.", "logic": "\nMarauding(faye)\nConnected(wileen)\nforall x (Connected(x) -> Auscultate(x, faye))\nforall x (Auscultate(x, faye) -> Concurrent(faye))\nforall x (Auscultate(x, faye) -> Connected(faye))\nforall x (Sink(x, faye) and Sink(faye, wileen) -> Concurrent(wileen))\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Sink(x, wileen) -> not Sink(x, faye))\nforall x (Sink(x, faye) and Discontent(faye) -> Mail(x, wileen))\n\nMail(faye, wileen)\n\nforall x (Sink(x, faye) and Discontent(faye) -> Mail(x, wileen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The adelind is deciphered. The moe is clumsy. If someone is clumsy then they need the adelind. If someone indwell the adelind then the adelind is sunset. If someone indwell the adelind then the adelind is clumsy. If someone perturb the adelind and the adelind perturb the moe then the moe is sunset. If someone is deciphered and they chase the moe then they do not chase the adelind. If someone perturb the adelind and the adelind is tired then they see the moe. The moe does not see the moe.", "logic": "\nDeciphered(adelind)\nClumsy(moe)\nforall x (Clumsy(x) -> Indwell(x, adelind))\nforall x (Indwell(x, adelind) -> Sunset(adelind))\nforall x (Indwell(x, adelind) -> Clumsy(adelind))\nforall x (Perturb(x, adelind) and Perturb(adelind, moe) -> Sunset(moe))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Perturb(x, moe) -> not Perturb(x, adelind))\nforall x (Perturb(x, adelind) and Tired(adelind) -> Infuse(x, moe))\n\nnot Infuse(moe, moe)\n\nforall x (Perturb(x, adelind) and Tired(adelind) -> Infuse(x, moe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The adolphe is likable. The marshal is amebous. If someone is amebous then they need the adolphe. If someone harbour the adolphe then the adolphe is humid. If someone harbour the adolphe then the adolphe is amebous. If someone tram the adolphe and the adolphe tram the marshal then the marshal is humid. If someone is likable and they chase the marshal then they do not chase the adolphe. If someone tram the adolphe and the adolphe is aglow then they see the marshal. The adolphe is cold.", "logic": "\nLikable(adolphe)\nAmebous(marshal)\nforall x (Amebous(x) -> Harbour(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Harbour(x, adolphe) -> Humid(adolphe))\nforall x (Harbour(x, adolphe) -> Amebous(adolphe))\nforall x (Tram(x, adolphe) and Tram(adolphe, marshal) -> Humid(marshal))\nforall x (Likable(x) and Tram(x, marshal) -> not Tram(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Tram(x, adolphe) and Aglow(adolphe) -> Waylay(x, marshal))\n\nCold(adolphe)\n\nCold(adolphe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The lissy is exogamous. The aileen is auctorial. If someone is auctorial then they need the lissy. If someone persist the lissy then the lissy is gilded. If someone persist the lissy then the lissy is auctorial. If someone bechance the lissy and the lissy bechance the aileen then the aileen is gilded. If someone is exogamous and they chase the aileen then they do not chase the lissy. If someone bechance the lissy and the lissy is upstair then they see the aileen. The aileen does not need the aileen.", "logic": "\nExogamous(lissy)\nAuctorial(aileen)\nforall x (Auctorial(x) -> Persist(x, lissy))\nforall x (Persist(x, lissy) -> Gilded(lissy))\nforall x (Persist(x, lissy) -> Auctorial(lissy))\nforall x (Bechance(x, lissy) and Bechance(lissy, aileen) -> Gilded(aileen))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) and Bechance(x, aileen) -> not Bechance(x, lissy))\nforall x (Bechance(x, lissy) and Upstair(lissy) -> Nictate(x, aileen))\n\nnot Persist(aileen, aileen)\n\nnot Persist(aileen, aileen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The ninon is musing. The minnie is lento. If someone is lento then they need the ninon. If someone hone the ninon then the ninon is terete. If someone hone the ninon then the ninon is lento. If someone inspirit the ninon and the ninon inspirit the minnie then the minnie is terete. If someone is musing and they chase the minnie then they do not chase the ninon. If someone inspirit the ninon and the ninon is stooping then they see the minnie. The ninon inspirit the ninon.", "logic": "\nMusing(ninon)\nLento(minnie)\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Hone(x, ninon))\nforall x (Hone(x, ninon) -> Terete(ninon))\nforall x (Hone(x, ninon) -> Lento(ninon))\nforall x (Inspirit(x, ninon) and Inspirit(ninon, minnie) -> Terete(minnie))\nforall x (Musing(x) and Inspirit(x, minnie) -> not Inspirit(x, ninon))\nforall x (Inspirit(x, ninon) and Stooping(ninon) -> Sigh(x, minnie))\n\nInspirit(ninon, ninon)\n\nInspirit(ninon, ninon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The staci is vermiform. The rubin is hasty. If someone is hasty then they need the staci. If someone appertain the staci then the staci is ascendant. If someone appertain the staci then the staci is hasty. If someone emplace the staci and the staci emplace the rubin then the rubin is ascendant. If someone is vermiform and they chase the rubin then they do not chase the staci. If someone emplace the staci and the staci is unsheathed then they see the rubin. The rubin does not chase the staci.", "logic": "\nVermiform(staci)\nHasty(rubin)\nforall x (Hasty(x) -> Appertain(x, staci))\nforall x (Appertain(x, staci) -> Ascendant(staci))\nforall x (Appertain(x, staci) -> Hasty(staci))\nforall x (Emplace(x, staci) and Emplace(staci, rubin) -> Ascendant(rubin))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) and Emplace(x, rubin) -> not Emplace(x, staci))\nforall x (Emplace(x, staci) and Unsheathed(staci) -> Front(x, rubin))\n\nnot Emplace(rubin, staci)\n\nnot Emplace(rubin, staci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The layney is motherless. The carmen is extremist. If someone is extremist then they need the layney. If someone catalogue the layney then the layney is germicidal. If someone catalogue the layney then the layney is extremist. If someone discount the layney and the layney discount the carmen then the carmen is germicidal. If someone is motherless and they chase the carmen then they do not chase the layney. If someone discount the layney and the layney is unintended then they see the carmen. The carmen is unintended.", "logic": "\nMotherless(layney)\nExtremist(carmen)\nforall x (Extremist(x) -> Catalogue(x, layney))\nforall x (Catalogue(x, layney) -> Germicidal(layney))\nforall x (Catalogue(x, layney) -> Extremist(layney))\nforall x (Discount(x, layney) and Discount(layney, carmen) -> Germicidal(carmen))\nforall x (Motherless(x) and Discount(x, carmen) -> not Discount(x, layney))\nforall x (Discount(x, layney) and Unintended(layney) -> Pleat(x, carmen))\n\nUnintended(carmen)\n\nUnintended(carmen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The betteann counter the jodie. The alwin swap the jodie. The jodie is arabian. If something counter the jodie and it is arabian then it is echoic. If something is arabian then it counter the betteann. If the betteann counter the alwin then the betteann swap the alwin. If something swap the jodie then the jodie counter the alwin. If the jodie is buff then the jodie swap the betteann. If the jodie is echoic then the jodie overburden the alwin. If something counter the alwin and it is arabian then the alwin is arabian. If something swap the betteann then it overburden the alwin. The jodie is arabian.", "logic": "\nCounter(betteann, jodie)\nSwap(alwin, jodie)\nArabian(jodie)\nforall x (Counter(x, jodie) and Arabian(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Arabian(x) -> Counter(x, betteann))\nCounter(betteann, alwin) -> Swap(betteann, alwin)\nforall x (Swap(x, jodie) -> Counter(jodie, alwin))\nBuff(jodie) -> Swap(jodie, betteann)\nEchoic(jodie) -> Overburden(jodie, alwin)\nforall x (Counter(x, alwin) and Arabian(x) -> Arabian(alwin))\nforall x (Swap(x, betteann) -> Overburden(x, alwin))\n\nArabian(jodie)\n\ntherefore Arabian(jodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The fernando culture the dryke. The janey slag the dryke. The dryke is rotatable. If something culture the dryke and it is rotatable then it is ravenous. If something is rotatable then it culture the fernando. If the fernando culture the janey then the fernando slag the janey. If something slag the dryke then the dryke culture the janey. If the dryke is unfunny then the dryke slag the fernando. If the dryke is ravenous then the dryke moonlight the janey. If something culture the janey and it is rotatable then the janey is rotatable. If something slag the fernando then it moonlight the janey. The janey does not chase the dryke.", "logic": "\nCulture(fernando, dryke)\nSlag(janey, dryke)\nRotatable(dryke)\nforall x (Culture(x, dryke) and Rotatable(x) -> Ravenous(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) -> Culture(x, fernando))\nCulture(fernando, janey) -> Slag(fernando, janey)\nforall x (Slag(x, dryke) -> Culture(dryke, janey))\nUnfunny(dryke) -> Slag(dryke, fernando)\nRavenous(dryke) -> Moonlight(dryke, janey)\nforall x (Culture(x, janey) and Rotatable(x) -> Rotatable(janey))\nforall x (Slag(x, fernando) -> Moonlight(x, janey))\n\nnot Slag(janey, dryke)\n\ntherefore Slag(janey, dryke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The sinead upheave the sandro. The giovanne dismiss the sandro. The sandro is geographic. If something upheave the sandro and it is geographic then it is agile. If something is geographic then it upheave the sinead. If the sinead upheave the giovanne then the sinead dismiss the giovanne. If something dismiss the sandro then the sandro upheave the giovanne. If the sandro is sunburned then the sandro dismiss the sinead. If the sandro is agile then the sandro brew the giovanne. If something upheave the giovanne and it is geographic then the giovanne is geographic. If something dismiss the sinead then it brew the giovanne. The sandro upheave the sinead.", "logic": "\nUpheave(sinead, sandro)\nDismiss(giovanne, sandro)\nGeographic(sandro)\nforall x (Upheave(x, sandro) and Geographic(x) -> Agile(x))\nforall x (Geographic(x) -> Upheave(x, sinead))\nUpheave(sinead, giovanne) -> Dismiss(sinead, giovanne)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, sandro) -> Upheave(sandro, giovanne))\nSunburned(sandro) -> Dismiss(sandro, sinead)\nAgile(sandro) -> Brew(sandro, giovanne)\nforall x (Upheave(x, giovanne) and Geographic(x) -> Geographic(giovanne))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, sinead) -> Brew(x, giovanne))\n\nUpheave(sandro, sinead)\n\nGeographic(sandro) and forall x (Geographic(x) -> Upheave(x, sinead)) -> therefore Upheave(sandro, sinead)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The yehudit soundproof the selene. The mufinella peep the selene. The selene is unwavering. If something soundproof the selene and it is unwavering then it is bacchantic. If something is unwavering then it soundproof the yehudit. If the yehudit soundproof the mufinella then the yehudit peep the mufinella. If something peep the selene then the selene soundproof the mufinella. If the selene is upstream then the selene peep the yehudit. If the selene is bacchantic then the selene cleat the mufinella. If something soundproof the mufinella and it is unwavering then the mufinella is unwavering. If something peep the yehudit then it cleat the mufinella. The selene does not need the yehudit.", "logic": "\nSoundproof(yehudit, selene)\nPeep(mufinella, selene)\nUnwavering(selene)\nforall x (Soundproof(x, selene) and Unwavering(x) -> Bacchantic(x))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> Soundproof(x, yehudit))\nSoundproof(yehudit, mufinella) -> Peep(yehudit, mufinella)\nforall x (Peep(x, selene) -> Soundproof(selene, mufinella))\nUpstream(selene) -> Peep(selene, yehudit)\nBacchantic(selene) -> Cleat(selene, mufinella)\nforall x (Soundproof(x, mufinella) and Unwavering(x) -> Unwavering(mufinella))\nforall x (Peep(x, yehudit) -> Cleat(x, mufinella))\n\nnot Soundproof(selene, yehudit)\n\nUnwavering(selene) and forall x (Unwavering(x) -> Soundproof(x, yehudit)) -> therefore Soundproof(selene, yehudit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The jordanna disclaim the galen. The adrienne float the galen. The galen is hiemal. If something disclaim the galen and it is hiemal then it is ferned. If something is hiemal then it disclaim the jordanna. If the jordanna disclaim the adrienne then the jordanna float the adrienne. If something float the galen then the galen disclaim the adrienne. If the galen is warm then the galen float the jordanna. If the galen is ferned then the galen yank the adrienne. If something disclaim the adrienne and it is hiemal then the adrienne is hiemal. If something float the jordanna then it yank the adrienne. The adrienne is hiemal.", "logic": "\nDisclaim(jordanna, galen)\nFloat(adrienne, galen)\nHiemal(galen)\nforall x (Disclaim(x, galen) and Hiemal(x) -> Ferned(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Disclaim(x, jordanna))\nDisclaim(jordanna, adrienne) -> Float(jordanna, adrienne)\nforall x (Float(x, galen) -> Disclaim(galen, adrienne))\nWarm(galen) -> Float(galen, jordanna)\nFerned(galen) -> Yank(galen, adrienne)\nforall x (Disclaim(x, adrienne) and Hiemal(x) -> Hiemal(adrienne))\nforall x (Float(x, jordanna) -> Yank(x, adrienne))\n\nHiemal(adrienne)\n\nFloat(adrienne, galen) and forall x (Float(x, galen) -> Disclaim(galen, adrienne)) -> therefore Disclaim(galen, adrienne) Disclaim(galen, adrienne) and Hiemal(galen) and forall x (Disclaim(x, adrienne) and Hiemal(x) -> Hiemal(adrienne)) -> therefore Hiemal(adrienne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The kaster belong the bernette. The geralda fuck the bernette. The bernette is orotund. If something belong the bernette and it is orotund then it is extrinsic. If something is orotund then it belong the kaster. If the kaster belong the geralda then the kaster fuck the geralda. If something fuck the bernette then the bernette belong the geralda. If the bernette is carinate then the bernette fuck the kaster. If the bernette is extrinsic then the bernette republish the geralda. If something belong the geralda and it is orotund then the geralda is orotund. If something fuck the kaster then it republish the geralda. The geralda is not orotund.", "logic": "\nBelong(kaster, bernette)\nFuck(geralda, bernette)\nOrotund(bernette)\nforall x (Belong(x, bernette) and Orotund(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\nforall x (Orotund(x) -> Belong(x, kaster))\nBelong(kaster, geralda) -> Fuck(kaster, geralda)\nforall x (Fuck(x, bernette) -> Belong(bernette, geralda))\nCarinate(bernette) -> Fuck(bernette, kaster)\nExtrinsic(bernette) -> Republish(bernette, geralda)\nforall x (Belong(x, geralda) and Orotund(x) -> Orotund(geralda))\nforall x (Fuck(x, kaster) -> Republish(x, geralda))\n\nnot Orotund(geralda)\n\nFuck(geralda, bernette) and forall x (Fuck(x, bernette) -> Belong(bernette, geralda)) -> therefore Belong(bernette, geralda) Belong(bernette, geralda) and Orotund(bernette) and forall x (Belong(x, geralda) and Orotund(x) -> Orotund(geralda)) -> therefore Orotund(geralda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The karlee squeegee the orelle. The chloris prink the orelle. The orelle is zairean. If something squeegee the orelle and it is zairean then it is diaphanous. If something is zairean then it squeegee the karlee. If the karlee squeegee the chloris then the karlee prink the chloris. If something prink the orelle then the orelle squeegee the chloris. If the orelle is antiguan then the orelle prink the karlee. If the orelle is diaphanous then the orelle wipe the chloris. If something squeegee the chloris and it is zairean then the chloris is zairean. If something prink the karlee then it wipe the chloris. The chloris squeegee the karlee.", "logic": "\nSqueegee(karlee, orelle)\nPrink(chloris, orelle)\nZairean(orelle)\nforall x (Squeegee(x, orelle) and Zairean(x) -> Diaphanous(x))\nforall x (Zairean(x) -> Squeegee(x, karlee))\nSqueegee(karlee, chloris) -> Prink(karlee, chloris)\nforall x (Prink(x, orelle) -> Squeegee(orelle, chloris))\nAntiguan(orelle) -> Prink(orelle, karlee)\nDiaphanous(orelle) -> Wipe(orelle, chloris)\nforall x (Squeegee(x, chloris) and Zairean(x) -> Zairean(chloris))\nforall x (Prink(x, karlee) -> Wipe(x, chloris))\n\nSqueegee(chloris, karlee)\n\nPrink(chloris, orelle) and forall x (Prink(x, orelle) -> Squeegee(orelle, chloris)) -> therefore Squeegee(orelle, chloris) Squeegee(orelle, chloris) and Zairean(orelle) and forall x (Squeegee(x, chloris) and Zairean(x) -> Zairean(chloris)) -> therefore Zairean(chloris) Zairean(chloris) and forall x (Zairean(x) -> Squeegee(x, karlee)) -> therefore Squeegee(chloris, karlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The waylin rime the pate. The terrie plot the pate. The pate is subjacent. If something rime the pate and it is subjacent then it is colorectal. If something is subjacent then it rime the waylin. If the waylin rime the terrie then the waylin plot the terrie. If something plot the pate then the pate rime the terrie. If the pate is scottish then the pate plot the waylin. If the pate is colorectal then the pate paddle the terrie. If something rime the terrie and it is subjacent then the terrie is subjacent. If something plot the waylin then it paddle the terrie. The terrie does not need the waylin.", "logic": "\nRime(waylin, pate)\nPlot(terrie, pate)\nSubjacent(pate)\nforall x (Rime(x, pate) and Subjacent(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Subjacent(x) -> Rime(x, waylin))\nRime(waylin, terrie) -> Plot(waylin, terrie)\nforall x (Plot(x, pate) -> Rime(pate, terrie))\nScottish(pate) -> Plot(pate, waylin)\nColorectal(pate) -> Paddle(pate, terrie)\nforall x (Rime(x, terrie) and Subjacent(x) -> Subjacent(terrie))\nforall x (Plot(x, waylin) -> Paddle(x, terrie))\n\nnot Rime(terrie, waylin)\n\nPlot(terrie, pate) and forall x (Plot(x, pate) -> Rime(pate, terrie)) -> therefore Rime(pate, terrie) Rime(pate, terrie) and Subjacent(pate) and forall x (Rime(x, terrie) and Subjacent(x) -> Subjacent(terrie)) -> therefore Subjacent(terrie) Subjacent(terrie) and forall x (Subjacent(x) -> Rime(x, waylin)) -> therefore Rime(terrie, waylin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The jordon moonlight the park. The kenn exudate the park. The park is adjunctive. If something moonlight the park and it is adjunctive then it is broody. If something is adjunctive then it moonlight the jordon. If the jordon moonlight the kenn then the jordon exudate the kenn. If something exudate the park then the park moonlight the kenn. If the park is undried then the park exudate the jordon. If the park is broody then the park bong the kenn. If something moonlight the kenn and it is adjunctive then the kenn is adjunctive. If something exudate the jordon then it bong the kenn. The park does not visit the kenn.", "logic": "\nMoonlight(jordon, park)\nExudate(kenn, park)\nAdjunctive(park)\nforall x (Moonlight(x, park) and Adjunctive(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Adjunctive(x) -> Moonlight(x, jordon))\nMoonlight(jordon, kenn) -> Exudate(jordon, kenn)\nforall x (Exudate(x, park) -> Moonlight(park, kenn))\nUndried(park) -> Exudate(park, jordon)\nBroody(park) -> Bong(park, kenn)\nforall x (Moonlight(x, kenn) and Adjunctive(x) -> Adjunctive(kenn))\nforall x (Exudate(x, jordon) -> Bong(x, kenn))\n\nnot Bong(park, kenn)\n\nBroody(park) -> Bong(park, kenn) <- forall x (Moonlight(x, park) and Adjunctive(x) -> Broody(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The sylvester jail the layne. The elena bivouac the layne. The layne is bardic. If something jail the layne and it is bardic then it is dyspneic. If something is bardic then it jail the sylvester. If the sylvester jail the elena then the sylvester bivouac the elena. If something bivouac the layne then the layne jail the elena. If the layne is popular then the layne bivouac the sylvester. If the layne is dyspneic then the layne robe the elena. If something jail the elena and it is bardic then the elena is bardic. If something bivouac the sylvester then it robe the elena. The layne bivouac the sylvester.", "logic": "\nJail(sylvester, layne)\nBivouac(elena, layne)\nBardic(layne)\nforall x (Jail(x, layne) and Bardic(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) -> Jail(x, sylvester))\nJail(sylvester, elena) -> Bivouac(sylvester, elena)\nforall x (Bivouac(x, layne) -> Jail(layne, elena))\nPopular(layne) -> Bivouac(layne, sylvester)\nDyspneic(layne) -> Robe(layne, elena)\nforall x (Jail(x, elena) and Bardic(x) -> Bardic(elena))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, sylvester) -> Robe(x, elena))\n\nBivouac(layne, sylvester)\n\nPopular(layne) -> Bivouac(layne, sylvester) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The katherine shallow the clarine. The mic verdigris the clarine. The clarine is flagging. If something shallow the clarine and it is flagging then it is bigmouthed. If something is flagging then it shallow the katherine. If the katherine shallow the mic then the katherine verdigris the mic. If something verdigris the clarine then the clarine shallow the mic. If the clarine is bodily then the clarine verdigris the katherine. If the clarine is bigmouthed then the clarine rhyme the mic. If something shallow the mic and it is flagging then the mic is flagging. If something verdigris the katherine then it rhyme the mic. The mic is not bigmouthed.", "logic": "\nShallow(katherine, clarine)\nVerdigris(mic, clarine)\nFlagging(clarine)\nforall x (Shallow(x, clarine) and Flagging(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nforall x (Flagging(x) -> Shallow(x, katherine))\nShallow(katherine, mic) -> Verdigris(katherine, mic)\nforall x (Verdigris(x, clarine) -> Shallow(clarine, mic))\nBodily(clarine) -> Verdigris(clarine, katherine)\nBigmouthed(clarine) -> Rhyme(clarine, mic)\nforall x (Shallow(x, mic) and Flagging(x) -> Flagging(mic))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, katherine) -> Rhyme(x, mic))\n\nnot Bigmouthed(mic)\n\nforall x (Shallow(x, clarine) and Flagging(x) -> Bigmouthed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The elbert content the verina. The pippa disconcert the verina. The verina is phrasal. If something content the verina and it is phrasal then it is teeming. If something is phrasal then it content the elbert. If the elbert content the pippa then the elbert disconcert the pippa. If something disconcert the verina then the verina content the pippa. If the verina is algonkian then the verina disconcert the elbert. If the verina is teeming then the verina facilitate the pippa. If something content the pippa and it is phrasal then the pippa is phrasal. If something disconcert the elbert then it facilitate the pippa. The pippa facilitate the pippa.", "logic": "\nContent(elbert, verina)\nDisconcert(pippa, verina)\nPhrasal(verina)\nforall x (Content(x, verina) and Phrasal(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) -> Content(x, elbert))\nContent(elbert, pippa) -> Disconcert(elbert, pippa)\nforall x (Disconcert(x, verina) -> Content(verina, pippa))\nAlgonkian(verina) -> Disconcert(verina, elbert)\nTeeming(verina) -> Facilitate(verina, pippa)\nforall x (Content(x, pippa) and Phrasal(x) -> Phrasal(pippa))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, elbert) -> Facilitate(x, pippa))\n\nFacilitate(pippa, pippa)\n\nforall x (Disconcert(x, elbert) -> Facilitate(x, pippa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The talbert perjure the joane. The bunnie throng the joane. The joane is impelled. If something perjure the joane and it is impelled then it is roughish. If something is impelled then it perjure the talbert. If the talbert perjure the bunnie then the talbert throng the bunnie. If something throng the joane then the joane perjure the bunnie. If the joane is decollete then the joane throng the talbert. If the joane is roughish then the joane bust the bunnie. If something perjure the bunnie and it is impelled then the bunnie is impelled. If something throng the talbert then it bust the bunnie. The talbert does not chase the talbert.", "logic": "\nPerjure(talbert, joane)\nThrong(bunnie, joane)\nImpelled(joane)\nforall x (Perjure(x, joane) and Impelled(x) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> Perjure(x, talbert))\nPerjure(talbert, bunnie) -> Throng(talbert, bunnie)\nforall x (Throng(x, joane) -> Perjure(joane, bunnie))\nDecollete(joane) -> Throng(joane, talbert)\nRoughish(joane) -> Bust(joane, bunnie)\nforall x (Perjure(x, bunnie) and Impelled(x) -> Impelled(bunnie))\nforall x (Throng(x, talbert) -> Bust(x, bunnie))\n\nnot Throng(talbert, talbert)\n\nnot Throng(talbert, talbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The andriana poise the carry. The irma coldcock the carry. The carry is arching. If something poise the carry and it is arching then it is submerged. If something is arching then it poise the andriana. If the andriana poise the irma then the andriana coldcock the irma. If something coldcock the carry then the carry poise the irma. If the carry is municipal then the carry coldcock the andriana. If the carry is submerged then the carry festoon the irma. If something poise the irma and it is arching then the irma is arching. If something coldcock the andriana then it festoon the irma. The carry is cold.", "logic": "\nPoise(andriana, carry)\nColdcock(irma, carry)\nArching(carry)\nforall x (Poise(x, carry) and Arching(x) -> Submerged(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Poise(x, andriana))\nPoise(andriana, irma) -> Coldcock(andriana, irma)\nforall x (Coldcock(x, carry) -> Poise(carry, irma))\nMunicipal(carry) -> Coldcock(carry, andriana)\nSubmerged(carry) -> Festoon(carry, irma)\nforall x (Poise(x, irma) and Arching(x) -> Arching(irma))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, andriana) -> Festoon(x, irma))\n\nCold(carry)\n\nCold(carry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The robina pledge the edi. The arvin recidivate the edi. The edi is localised. If something pledge the edi and it is localised then it is conjoined. If something is localised then it pledge the robina. If the robina pledge the arvin then the robina recidivate the arvin. If something recidivate the edi then the edi pledge the arvin. If the edi is semitic then the edi recidivate the robina. If the edi is conjoined then the edi tame the arvin. If something pledge the arvin and it is localised then the arvin is localised. If something recidivate the robina then it tame the arvin. The robina is not localised.", "logic": "\nPledge(robina, edi)\nRecidivate(arvin, edi)\nLocalised(edi)\nforall x (Pledge(x, edi) and Localised(x) -> Conjoined(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) -> Pledge(x, robina))\nPledge(robina, arvin) -> Recidivate(robina, arvin)\nforall x (Recidivate(x, edi) -> Pledge(edi, arvin))\nSemitic(edi) -> Recidivate(edi, robina)\nConjoined(edi) -> Tame(edi, arvin)\nforall x (Pledge(x, arvin) and Localised(x) -> Localised(arvin))\nforall x (Recidivate(x, robina) -> Tame(x, arvin))\n\nnot Localised(robina)\n\nnot Localised(robina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The agnes inch the parry. The tiertza calumniate the parry. The parry is metatarsal. If something inch the parry and it is metatarsal then it is mithraic. If something is metatarsal then it inch the agnes. If the agnes inch the tiertza then the agnes calumniate the tiertza. If something calumniate the parry then the parry inch the tiertza. If the parry is isoclinic then the parry calumniate the agnes. If the parry is mithraic then the parry filch the tiertza. If something inch the tiertza and it is metatarsal then the tiertza is metatarsal. If something calumniate the agnes then it filch the tiertza. The tiertza filch the parry.", "logic": "\nInch(agnes, parry)\nCalumniate(tiertza, parry)\nMetatarsal(parry)\nforall x (Inch(x, parry) and Metatarsal(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) -> Inch(x, agnes))\nInch(agnes, tiertza) -> Calumniate(agnes, tiertza)\nforall x (Calumniate(x, parry) -> Inch(parry, tiertza))\nIsoclinic(parry) -> Calumniate(parry, agnes)\nMithraic(parry) -> Filch(parry, tiertza)\nforall x (Inch(x, tiertza) and Metatarsal(x) -> Metatarsal(tiertza))\nforall x (Calumniate(x, agnes) -> Filch(x, tiertza))\n\nFilch(tiertza, parry)\n\nFilch(tiertza, parry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "Wyndham is crude. Wyndham is unrentable. Wyndham is stillborn. Lazare is ebony. Lazare is jeweled. Lazare is unrentable. Lazare is aghast. If something is jeweled then it is unrentable. Red things are not jeweled. If something is cubic then it is jeweled. If Lazare is jeweled then Lazare is ebony. All cubic, unrentable things are stillborn. If Wyndham is not jeweled and Wyndham is not unrentable then Wyndham is ebony. If something is unrentable and not jeweled then it is aghast. If something is aghast and not jeweled then it is not ebony. Lazare is aghast.", "logic": "\nCrude(wyndham)\nUnrentable(wyndham)\nStillborn(wyndham)\nEbony(lazare)\nJeweled(lazare)\nUnrentable(lazare)\nAghast(lazare)\nforall x (Jeweled(x) -> Unrentable(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> not Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Cubic(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nJeweled(lazare) -> Ebony(lazare)\nforall x (Cubic(x) and Unrentable(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nnot Jeweled(wyndham) and not Unrentable(wyndham) -> Ebony(wyndham)\nforall x (Unrentable(x) and not Jeweled(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Aghast(x) and not Jeweled(x) -> not Ebony(x))\n\nAghast(lazare)\n\ntherefore Aghast(lazare)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Harman is impersonal. Harman is whorled. Harman is skillful. Ivy is serbian. Ivy is puckish. Ivy is whorled. Ivy is oral. If something is puckish then it is whorled. Red things are not puckish. If something is sear then it is puckish. If Ivy is puckish then Ivy is serbian. All sear, whorled things are skillful. If Harman is not puckish and Harman is not whorled then Harman is serbian. If something is whorled and not puckish then it is oral. If something is oral and not puckish then it is not serbian. Harman is not impersonal.", "logic": "\nImpersonal(harman)\nWhorled(harman)\nSkillful(harman)\nSerbian(ivy)\nPuckish(ivy)\nWhorled(ivy)\nOral(ivy)\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Whorled(x))\nforall x (Skillful(x) -> not Puckish(x))\nforall x (Sear(x) -> Puckish(x))\nPuckish(ivy) -> Serbian(ivy)\nforall x (Sear(x) and Whorled(x) -> Skillful(x))\nnot Puckish(harman) and not Whorled(harman) -> Serbian(harman)\nforall x (Whorled(x) and not Puckish(x) -> Oral(x))\nforall x (Oral(x) and not Puckish(x) -> not Serbian(x))\n\nnot Impersonal(harman)\n\ntherefore Impersonal(harman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Lorie is fighting. Lorie is prior. Lorie is comose. Grier is polyphase. Grier is astragalar. Grier is prior. Grier is aphakic. If something is astragalar then it is prior. Red things are not astragalar. If something is dastardly then it is astragalar. If Grier is astragalar then Grier is polyphase. All dastardly, prior things are comose. If Lorie is not astragalar and Lorie is not prior then Lorie is polyphase. If something is prior and not astragalar then it is aphakic. If something is aphakic and not astragalar then it is not polyphase. Lorie is not astragalar.", "logic": "\nFighting(lorie)\nPrior(lorie)\nComose(lorie)\nPolyphase(grier)\nAstragalar(grier)\nPrior(grier)\nAphakic(grier)\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> Prior(x))\nforall x (Comose(x) -> not Astragalar(x))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Astragalar(x))\nAstragalar(grier) -> Polyphase(grier)\nforall x (Dastardly(x) and Prior(x) -> Comose(x))\nnot Astragalar(lorie) and not Prior(lorie) -> Polyphase(lorie)\nforall x (Prior(x) and not Astragalar(x) -> Aphakic(x))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) and not Astragalar(x) -> not Polyphase(x))\n\nnot Astragalar(lorie)\n\nComose(lorie) and forall x (Comose(x) -> not Astragalar(x)) -> therefore not Astragalar(lorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Rozanne is slaphappy. Rozanne is xvii. Rozanne is solidified. Cassey is spartan. Cassey is punitory. Cassey is xvii. Cassey is crowded. If something is punitory then it is xvii. Red things are not punitory. If something is sheeny then it is punitory. If Cassey is punitory then Cassey is spartan. All sheeny, xvii things are solidified. If Rozanne is not punitory and Rozanne is not xvii then Rozanne is spartan. If something is xvii and not punitory then it is crowded. If something is crowded and not punitory then it is not spartan. Rozanne is punitory.", "logic": "\nSlaphappy(rozanne)\nXvii(rozanne)\nSolidified(rozanne)\nSpartan(cassey)\nPunitory(cassey)\nXvii(cassey)\nCrowded(cassey)\nforall x (Punitory(x) -> Xvii(x))\nforall x (Solidified(x) -> not Punitory(x))\nforall x (Sheeny(x) -> Punitory(x))\nPunitory(cassey) -> Spartan(cassey)\nforall x (Sheeny(x) and Xvii(x) -> Solidified(x))\nnot Punitory(rozanne) and not Xvii(rozanne) -> Spartan(rozanne)\nforall x (Xvii(x) and not Punitory(x) -> Crowded(x))\nforall x (Crowded(x) and not Punitory(x) -> not Spartan(x))\n\nPunitory(rozanne)\n\nSolidified(rozanne) and forall x (Solidified(x) -> not Punitory(x)) -> therefore not Punitory(rozanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Karleen is germane. Karleen is convex. Karleen is conventual. Angel is remittent. Angel is fogged. Angel is convex. Angel is adaptable. If something is fogged then it is convex. Red things are not fogged. If something is ahorse then it is fogged. If Angel is fogged then Angel is remittent. All ahorse, convex things are conventual. If Karleen is not fogged and Karleen is not convex then Karleen is remittent. If something is convex and not fogged then it is adaptable. If something is adaptable and not fogged then it is not remittent. Karleen is adaptable.", "logic": "\nGermane(karleen)\nConvex(karleen)\nConventual(karleen)\nRemittent(angel)\nFogged(angel)\nConvex(angel)\nAdaptable(angel)\nforall x (Fogged(x) -> Convex(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> not Fogged(x))\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Fogged(x))\nFogged(angel) -> Remittent(angel)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) and Convex(x) -> Conventual(x))\nnot Fogged(karleen) and not Convex(karleen) -> Remittent(karleen)\nforall x (Convex(x) and not Fogged(x) -> Adaptable(x))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) and not Fogged(x) -> not Remittent(x))\n\nAdaptable(karleen)\n\nConventual(karleen) and forall x (Conventual(x) -> not Fogged(x)) -> therefore not Fogged(karleen) Convex(karleen) and not Fogged(karleen) and forall x (Convex(x) and not Fogged(x) -> Adaptable(x)) -> therefore Adaptable(karleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Paul is unbooked. Paul is accurst. Paul is fain. Leandra is bovid. Leandra is demure. Leandra is accurst. Leandra is boylike. If something is demure then it is accurst. Red things are not demure. If something is near then it is demure. If Leandra is demure then Leandra is bovid. All near, accurst things are fain. If Paul is not demure and Paul is not accurst then Paul is bovid. If something is accurst and not demure then it is boylike. If something is boylike and not demure then it is not bovid. Paul is not boylike.", "logic": "\nUnbooked(paul)\nAccurst(paul)\nFain(paul)\nBovid(leandra)\nDemure(leandra)\nAccurst(leandra)\nBoylike(leandra)\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Fain(x) -> not Demure(x))\nforall x (Near(x) -> Demure(x))\nDemure(leandra) -> Bovid(leandra)\nforall x (Near(x) and Accurst(x) -> Fain(x))\nnot Demure(paul) and not Accurst(paul) -> Bovid(paul)\nforall x (Accurst(x) and not Demure(x) -> Boylike(x))\nforall x (Boylike(x) and not Demure(x) -> not Bovid(x))\n\nnot Boylike(paul)\n\nFain(paul) and forall x (Fain(x) -> not Demure(x)) -> therefore not Demure(paul) Accurst(paul) and not Demure(paul) and forall x (Accurst(x) and not Demure(x) -> Boylike(x)) -> therefore Boylike(paul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Kin is autotypic. Kin is cellular. Kin is ovoid. Kevyn is trimotored. Kevyn is galwegian. Kevyn is cellular. Kevyn is clxx. If something is galwegian then it is cellular. Red things are not galwegian. If something is adverse then it is galwegian. If Kevyn is galwegian then Kevyn is trimotored. All adverse, cellular things are ovoid. If Kin is not galwegian and Kin is not cellular then Kin is trimotored. If something is cellular and not galwegian then it is clxx. If something is clxx and not galwegian then it is not trimotored. Kin is not trimotored.", "logic": "\nAutotypic(kin)\nCellular(kin)\nOvoid(kin)\nTrimotored(kevyn)\nGalwegian(kevyn)\nCellular(kevyn)\nClxx(kevyn)\nforall x (Galwegian(x) -> Cellular(x))\nforall x (Ovoid(x) -> not Galwegian(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) -> Galwegian(x))\nGalwegian(kevyn) -> Trimotored(kevyn)\nforall x (Adverse(x) and Cellular(x) -> Ovoid(x))\nnot Galwegian(kin) and not Cellular(kin) -> Trimotored(kin)\nforall x (Cellular(x) and not Galwegian(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) and not Galwegian(x) -> not Trimotored(x))\n\nnot Trimotored(kin)\n\nOvoid(kin) and forall x (Ovoid(x) -> not Galwegian(x)) -> therefore not Galwegian(kin) Cellular(kin) and not Galwegian(kin) and forall x (Cellular(x) and not Galwegian(x) -> Clxx(x)) -> therefore Clxx(kin) Ovoid(kin) and forall x (Ovoid(x) -> not Galwegian(x)) -> therefore not Galwegian(kin) Clxx(kin) and not Galwegian(kin) and forall x (Clxx(x) and not Galwegian(x) -> not Trimotored(x)) -> therefore not Trimotored(kin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Gladys is searching. Gladys is doubled. Gladys is chaldaean. Arda is fearful. Arda is parental. Arda is doubled. Arda is pyknotic. If something is parental then it is doubled. Red things are not parental. If something is common then it is parental. If Arda is parental then Arda is fearful. All common, doubled things are chaldaean. If Gladys is not parental and Gladys is not doubled then Gladys is fearful. If something is doubled and not parental then it is pyknotic. If something is pyknotic and not parental then it is not fearful. Gladys is fearful.", "logic": "\nSearching(gladys)\nDoubled(gladys)\nChaldaean(gladys)\nFearful(arda)\nParental(arda)\nDoubled(arda)\nPyknotic(arda)\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Doubled(x))\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) -> not Parental(x))\nforall x (Common(x) -> Parental(x))\nParental(arda) -> Fearful(arda)\nforall x (Common(x) and Doubled(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nnot Parental(gladys) and not Doubled(gladys) -> Fearful(gladys)\nforall x (Doubled(x) and not Parental(x) -> Pyknotic(x))\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) and not Parental(x) -> not Fearful(x))\n\nFearful(gladys)\n\nChaldaean(gladys) and forall x (Chaldaean(x) -> not Parental(x)) -> therefore not Parental(gladys) Doubled(gladys) and not Parental(gladys) and forall x (Doubled(x) and not Parental(x) -> Pyknotic(x)) -> therefore Pyknotic(gladys) Chaldaean(gladys) and forall x (Chaldaean(x) -> not Parental(x)) -> therefore not Parental(gladys) Pyknotic(gladys) and not Parental(gladys) and forall x (Pyknotic(x) and not Parental(x) -> not Fearful(x)) -> therefore not Fearful(gladys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Dulcea is choosy. Dulcea is indexical. Dulcea is trabeated. Antonino is centralist. Antonino is marmoreal. Antonino is indexical. Antonino is euphonical. If something is marmoreal then it is indexical. Red things are not marmoreal. If something is hoar then it is marmoreal. If Antonino is marmoreal then Antonino is centralist. All hoar, indexical things are trabeated. If Dulcea is not marmoreal and Dulcea is not indexical then Dulcea is centralist. If something is indexical and not marmoreal then it is euphonical. If something is euphonical and not marmoreal then it is not centralist. Antonino is not trabeated.", "logic": "\nChoosy(dulcea)\nIndexical(dulcea)\nTrabeated(dulcea)\nCentralist(antonino)\nMarmoreal(antonino)\nIndexical(antonino)\nEuphonical(antonino)\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Indexical(x))\nforall x (Trabeated(x) -> not Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Hoar(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\nMarmoreal(antonino) -> Centralist(antonino)\nforall x (Hoar(x) and Indexical(x) -> Trabeated(x))\nnot Marmoreal(dulcea) and not Indexical(dulcea) -> Centralist(dulcea)\nforall x (Indexical(x) and not Marmoreal(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Euphonical(x) and not Marmoreal(x) -> not Centralist(x))\n\nnot Trabeated(antonino)\n\nforall x (Hoar(x) and Indexical(x) -> Trabeated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Loralyn is upcurved. Loralyn is tucked. Loralyn is vernacular. Shellie is mocking. Shellie is paternal. Shellie is tucked. Shellie is waxed. If something is paternal then it is tucked. Red things are not paternal. If something is blustery then it is paternal. If Shellie is paternal then Shellie is mocking. All blustery, tucked things are vernacular. If Loralyn is not paternal and Loralyn is not tucked then Loralyn is mocking. If something is tucked and not paternal then it is waxed. If something is waxed and not paternal then it is not mocking. Shellie is upcurved.", "logic": "\nUpcurved(loralyn)\nTucked(loralyn)\nVernacular(loralyn)\nMocking(shellie)\nPaternal(shellie)\nTucked(shellie)\nWaxed(shellie)\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> Tucked(x))\nforall x (Vernacular(x) -> not Paternal(x))\nforall x (Blustery(x) -> Paternal(x))\nPaternal(shellie) -> Mocking(shellie)\nforall x (Blustery(x) and Tucked(x) -> Vernacular(x))\nnot Paternal(loralyn) and not Tucked(loralyn) -> Mocking(loralyn)\nforall x (Tucked(x) and not Paternal(x) -> Waxed(x))\nforall x (Waxed(x) and not Paternal(x) -> not Mocking(x))\n\nUpcurved(shellie)\n\nUpcurved(shellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Merrily is couth. Merrily is satisfying. Merrily is pulverized. Breena is stunted. Breena is sudden. Breena is satisfying. Breena is mindful. If something is sudden then it is satisfying. Red things are not sudden. If something is major then it is sudden. If Breena is sudden then Breena is stunted. All major, satisfying things are pulverized. If Merrily is not sudden and Merrily is not satisfying then Merrily is stunted. If something is satisfying and not sudden then it is mindful. If something is mindful and not sudden then it is not stunted. Merrily is not major.", "logic": "\nCouth(merrily)\nSatisfying(merrily)\nPulverized(merrily)\nStunted(breena)\nSudden(breena)\nSatisfying(breena)\nMindful(breena)\nforall x (Sudden(x) -> Satisfying(x))\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> not Sudden(x))\nforall x (Major(x) -> Sudden(x))\nSudden(breena) -> Stunted(breena)\nforall x (Major(x) and Satisfying(x) -> Pulverized(x))\nnot Sudden(merrily) and not Satisfying(merrily) -> Stunted(merrily)\nforall x (Satisfying(x) and not Sudden(x) -> Mindful(x))\nforall x (Mindful(x) and not Sudden(x) -> not Stunted(x))\n\nnot Major(merrily)\n\nnot Major(merrily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Robina is cubist. Robina is flaunty. Robina is flabby. Phaedra is askew. Phaedra is sadducean. Phaedra is flaunty. Phaedra is crazed. If something is sadducean then it is flaunty. Red things are not sadducean. If something is brumal then it is sadducean. If Phaedra is sadducean then Phaedra is askew. All brumal, flaunty things are flabby. If Robina is not sadducean and Robina is not flaunty then Robina is askew. If something is flaunty and not sadducean then it is crazed. If something is crazed and not sadducean then it is not askew. Phaedra is brumal.", "logic": "\nCubist(robina)\nFlaunty(robina)\nFlabby(robina)\nAskew(phaedra)\nSadducean(phaedra)\nFlaunty(phaedra)\nCrazed(phaedra)\nforall x (Sadducean(x) -> Flaunty(x))\nforall x (Flabby(x) -> not Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nSadducean(phaedra) -> Askew(phaedra)\nforall x (Brumal(x) and Flaunty(x) -> Flabby(x))\nnot Sadducean(robina) and not Flaunty(robina) -> Askew(robina)\nforall x (Flaunty(x) and not Sadducean(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) and not Sadducean(x) -> not Askew(x))\n\nBrumal(phaedra)\n\nBrumal(phaedra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "The wain nosedive the dawna. The dawna rise the wain. If someone is petite then they do not need the dawna. If someone is micropylar and asterisked then they eat the wain. If someone nosedive the wain then they need the wain. If someone rise the dawna then they need the wain. If the dawna rise the wain then the wain rise the dawna. If someone is petite and they do not eat the wain then the wain rave the dawna. If someone rave the wain then the wain rave the dawna. If someone is petite and they do not need the wain then they eat the dawna. The wain nosedive the dawna.", "logic": "\nNosedive(wain, dawna)\nRise(dawna, wain)\nforall x (Petite(x) -> not Rave(x, dawna))\nforall x (Micropylar(x) and Asterisked(x) -> Nosedive(x, wain))\nforall x (Nosedive(x, wain) -> Rave(x, wain))\nforall x (Rise(x, dawna) -> Rave(x, wain))\nRise(dawna, wain) -> Rise(wain, dawna)\nforall x (Petite(x) and not Nosedive(x, wain) -> Rave(wain, dawna))\nforall x (Rave(x, wain) -> Rave(wain, dawna))\nforall x (Petite(x) and not Rave(x, wain) -> Nosedive(x, dawna))\n\nNosedive(wain, dawna)\n\ntherefore Nosedive(wain, dawna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The cindy adduct the harlin. The harlin slither the cindy. If someone is healthier then they do not need the harlin. If someone is regnant and unendowed then they eat the cindy. If someone adduct the cindy then they need the cindy. If someone slither the harlin then they need the cindy. If the harlin slither the cindy then the cindy slither the harlin. If someone is healthier and they do not eat the cindy then the cindy flummox the harlin. If someone flummox the cindy then the cindy flummox the harlin. If someone is healthier and they do not need the cindy then they eat the harlin. The cindy does not eat the harlin.", "logic": "\nAdduct(cindy, harlin)\nSlither(harlin, cindy)\nforall x (Healthier(x) -> not Flummox(x, harlin))\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Unendowed(x) -> Adduct(x, cindy))\nforall x (Adduct(x, cindy) -> Flummox(x, cindy))\nforall x (Slither(x, harlin) -> Flummox(x, cindy))\nSlither(harlin, cindy) -> Slither(cindy, harlin)\nforall x (Healthier(x) and not Adduct(x, cindy) -> Flummox(cindy, harlin))\nforall x (Flummox(x, cindy) -> Flummox(cindy, harlin))\nforall x (Healthier(x) and not Flummox(x, cindy) -> Adduct(x, harlin))\n\nnot Adduct(cindy, harlin)\n\ntherefore Adduct(cindy, harlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The lorain bilk the phyllida. The phyllida undulate the lorain. If someone is pestering then they do not need the phyllida. If someone is setose and deafening then they eat the lorain. If someone bilk the lorain then they need the lorain. If someone undulate the phyllida then they need the lorain. If the phyllida undulate the lorain then the lorain undulate the phyllida. If someone is pestering and they do not eat the lorain then the lorain undulate the phyllida. If someone undulate the lorain then the lorain undulate the phyllida. If someone is pestering and they do not need the lorain then they eat the phyllida. The lorain undulate the phyllida.", "logic": "\nBilk(lorain, phyllida)\nUndulate(phyllida, lorain)\nforall x (Pestering(x) -> not Undulate(x, phyllida))\nforall x (Setose(x) and Deafening(x) -> Bilk(x, lorain))\nforall x (Bilk(x, lorain) -> Undulate(x, lorain))\nforall x (Undulate(x, phyllida) -> Undulate(x, lorain))\nUndulate(phyllida, lorain) -> Undulate(lorain, phyllida)\nforall x (Pestering(x) and not Bilk(x, lorain) -> Undulate(lorain, phyllida))\nforall x (Undulate(x, lorain) -> Undulate(lorain, phyllida))\nforall x (Pestering(x) and not Undulate(x, lorain) -> Bilk(x, phyllida))\n\nUndulate(lorain, phyllida)\n\nUndulate(phyllida, lorain) and Undulate(phyllida, lorain) -> Undulate(lorain, phyllida) -> therefore Undulate(lorain, phyllida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The lani process the gracia. The gracia metalize the lani. If someone is strangled then they do not need the gracia. If someone is derisory and unthematic then they eat the lani. If someone process the lani then they need the lani. If someone metalize the gracia then they need the lani. If the gracia metalize the lani then the lani metalize the gracia. If someone is strangled and they do not eat the lani then the lani deport the gracia. If someone deport the lani then the lani deport the gracia. If someone is strangled and they do not need the lani then they eat the gracia. The lani does not see the gracia.", "logic": "\nProcess(lani, gracia)\nMetalize(gracia, lani)\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> not Deport(x, gracia))\nforall x (Derisory(x) and Unthematic(x) -> Process(x, lani))\nforall x (Process(x, lani) -> Deport(x, lani))\nforall x (Metalize(x, gracia) -> Deport(x, lani))\nMetalize(gracia, lani) -> Metalize(lani, gracia)\nforall x (Strangled(x) and not Process(x, lani) -> Deport(lani, gracia))\nforall x (Deport(x, lani) -> Deport(lani, gracia))\nforall x (Strangled(x) and not Deport(x, lani) -> Process(x, gracia))\n\nnot Metalize(lani, gracia)\n\nMetalize(gracia, lani) and Metalize(gracia, lani) -> Metalize(lani, gracia) -> therefore Metalize(lani, gracia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The harrison disregard the annabal. The annabal transition the harrison. If someone is isometric then they do not need the annabal. If someone is diffuse and lubberly then they eat the harrison. If someone disregard the harrison then they need the harrison. If someone transition the annabal then they need the harrison. If the annabal transition the harrison then the harrison transition the annabal. If someone is isometric and they do not eat the harrison then the harrison recover the annabal. If someone recover the harrison then the harrison recover the annabal. If someone is isometric and they do not need the harrison then they eat the annabal. The harrison recover the harrison.", "logic": "\nDisregard(harrison, annabal)\nTransition(annabal, harrison)\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> not Recover(x, annabal))\nforall x (Diffuse(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Disregard(x, harrison))\nforall x (Disregard(x, harrison) -> Recover(x, harrison))\nforall x (Transition(x, annabal) -> Recover(x, harrison))\nTransition(annabal, harrison) -> Transition(harrison, annabal)\nforall x (Isometric(x) and not Disregard(x, harrison) -> Recover(harrison, annabal))\nforall x (Recover(x, harrison) -> Recover(harrison, annabal))\nforall x (Isometric(x) and not Recover(x, harrison) -> Disregard(x, annabal))\n\nRecover(harrison, harrison)\n\nTransition(annabal, harrison) and Transition(annabal, harrison) -> Transition(harrison, annabal) -> therefore Transition(harrison, annabal) Transition(harrison, annabal) and forall x (Transition(x, annabal) -> Recover(x, harrison)) -> therefore Recover(harrison, harrison)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The craig bong the oliver. The oliver beseem the craig. If someone is under then they do not need the oliver. If someone is holophytic and grumbling then they eat the craig. If someone bong the craig then they need the craig. If someone beseem the oliver then they need the craig. If the oliver beseem the craig then the craig beseem the oliver. If someone is under and they do not eat the craig then the craig dethrone the oliver. If someone dethrone the craig then the craig dethrone the oliver. If someone is under and they do not need the craig then they eat the oliver. The craig does not need the craig.", "logic": "\nBong(craig, oliver)\nBeseem(oliver, craig)\nforall x (Under(x) -> not Dethrone(x, oliver))\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Grumbling(x) -> Bong(x, craig))\nforall x (Bong(x, craig) -> Dethrone(x, craig))\nforall x (Beseem(x, oliver) -> Dethrone(x, craig))\nBeseem(oliver, craig) -> Beseem(craig, oliver)\nforall x (Under(x) and not Bong(x, craig) -> Dethrone(craig, oliver))\nforall x (Dethrone(x, craig) -> Dethrone(craig, oliver))\nforall x (Under(x) and not Dethrone(x, craig) -> Bong(x, oliver))\n\nnot Dethrone(craig, craig)\n\nBeseem(oliver, craig) and Beseem(oliver, craig) -> Beseem(craig, oliver) -> therefore Beseem(craig, oliver) Beseem(craig, oliver) and forall x (Beseem(x, oliver) -> Dethrone(x, craig)) -> therefore Dethrone(craig, craig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The haley confound the casie. The casie pinch the haley. If someone is sensible then they do not need the casie. If someone is damaging and malthusian then they eat the haley. If someone confound the haley then they need the haley. If someone pinch the casie then they need the haley. If the casie pinch the haley then the haley pinch the casie. If someone is sensible and they do not eat the haley then the haley fritter the casie. If someone fritter the haley then the haley fritter the casie. If someone is sensible and they do not need the haley then they eat the casie. The haley fritter the casie.", "logic": "\nConfound(haley, casie)\nPinch(casie, haley)\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> not Fritter(x, casie))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and Malthusian(x) -> Confound(x, haley))\nforall x (Confound(x, haley) -> Fritter(x, haley))\nforall x (Pinch(x, casie) -> Fritter(x, haley))\nPinch(casie, haley) -> Pinch(haley, casie)\nforall x (Sensible(x) and not Confound(x, haley) -> Fritter(haley, casie))\nforall x (Fritter(x, haley) -> Fritter(haley, casie))\nforall x (Sensible(x) and not Fritter(x, haley) -> Confound(x, casie))\n\nFritter(haley, casie)\n\nPinch(casie, haley) and Pinch(casie, haley) -> Pinch(haley, casie) -> therefore Pinch(haley, casie) Pinch(haley, casie) and forall x (Pinch(x, casie) -> Fritter(x, haley)) -> therefore Fritter(haley, haley) Fritter(haley, haley) and forall x (Fritter(x, haley) -> Fritter(haley, casie)) -> therefore Fritter(haley, casie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The sayers protrude the amalea. The amalea crossruff the sayers. If someone is supposable then they do not need the amalea. If someone is unready and maledict then they eat the sayers. If someone protrude the sayers then they need the sayers. If someone crossruff the amalea then they need the sayers. If the amalea crossruff the sayers then the sayers crossruff the amalea. If someone is supposable and they do not eat the sayers then the sayers recapture the amalea. If someone recapture the sayers then the sayers recapture the amalea. If someone is supposable and they do not need the sayers then they eat the amalea. The sayers does not need the amalea.", "logic": "\nProtrude(sayers, amalea)\nCrossruff(amalea, sayers)\nforall x (Supposable(x) -> not Recapture(x, amalea))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Maledict(x) -> Protrude(x, sayers))\nforall x (Protrude(x, sayers) -> Recapture(x, sayers))\nforall x (Crossruff(x, amalea) -> Recapture(x, sayers))\nCrossruff(amalea, sayers) -> Crossruff(sayers, amalea)\nforall x (Supposable(x) and not Protrude(x, sayers) -> Recapture(sayers, amalea))\nforall x (Recapture(x, sayers) -> Recapture(sayers, amalea))\nforall x (Supposable(x) and not Recapture(x, sayers) -> Protrude(x, amalea))\n\nnot Recapture(sayers, amalea)\n\nCrossruff(amalea, sayers) and Crossruff(amalea, sayers) -> Crossruff(sayers, amalea) -> therefore Crossruff(sayers, amalea) Crossruff(sayers, amalea) and forall x (Crossruff(x, amalea) -> Recapture(x, sayers)) -> therefore Recapture(sayers, sayers) Recapture(sayers, sayers) and forall x (Recapture(x, sayers) -> Recapture(sayers, amalea)) -> therefore Recapture(sayers, amalea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The rissa droop the roda. The roda bobsled the rissa. If someone is cosmogenic then they do not need the roda. If someone is needy and jangly then they eat the rissa. If someone droop the rissa then they need the rissa. If someone bobsled the roda then they need the rissa. If the roda bobsled the rissa then the rissa bobsled the roda. If someone is cosmogenic and they do not eat the rissa then the rissa sleet the roda. If someone sleet the rissa then the rissa sleet the roda. If someone is cosmogenic and they do not need the rissa then they eat the roda. The roda does not eat the roda.", "logic": "\nDroop(rissa, roda)\nBobsled(roda, rissa)\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) -> not Sleet(x, roda))\nforall x (Needy(x) and Jangly(x) -> Droop(x, rissa))\nforall x (Droop(x, rissa) -> Sleet(x, rissa))\nforall x (Bobsled(x, roda) -> Sleet(x, rissa))\nBobsled(roda, rissa) -> Bobsled(rissa, roda)\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and not Droop(x, rissa) -> Sleet(rissa, roda))\nforall x (Sleet(x, rissa) -> Sleet(rissa, roda))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and not Sleet(x, rissa) -> Droop(x, roda))\n\nnot Droop(roda, roda)\n\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and not Sleet(x, rissa) -> Droop(x, roda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The libbey earmark the walter. The walter fasten the libbey. If someone is everyday then they do not need the walter. If someone is genetical and burdened then they eat the libbey. If someone earmark the libbey then they need the libbey. If someone fasten the walter then they need the libbey. If the walter fasten the libbey then the libbey fasten the walter. If someone is everyday and they do not eat the libbey then the libbey cash the walter. If someone cash the libbey then the libbey cash the walter. If someone is everyday and they do not need the libbey then they eat the walter. The libbey earmark the libbey.", "logic": "\nEarmark(libbey, walter)\nFasten(walter, libbey)\nforall x (Everyday(x) -> not Cash(x, walter))\nforall x (Genetical(x) and Burdened(x) -> Earmark(x, libbey))\nforall x (Earmark(x, libbey) -> Cash(x, libbey))\nforall x (Fasten(x, walter) -> Cash(x, libbey))\nFasten(walter, libbey) -> Fasten(libbey, walter)\nforall x (Everyday(x) and not Earmark(x, libbey) -> Cash(libbey, walter))\nforall x (Cash(x, libbey) -> Cash(libbey, walter))\nforall x (Everyday(x) and not Cash(x, libbey) -> Earmark(x, walter))\n\nEarmark(libbey, libbey)\n\nforall x (Genetical(x) and Burdened(x) -> Earmark(x, libbey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The patricio incandesce the maddy. The maddy inclose the patricio. If someone is anaerobic then they do not need the maddy. If someone is nutlike and tawny then they eat the patricio. If someone incandesce the patricio then they need the patricio. If someone inclose the maddy then they need the patricio. If the maddy inclose the patricio then the patricio inclose the maddy. If someone is anaerobic and they do not eat the patricio then the patricio nonplus the maddy. If someone nonplus the patricio then the patricio nonplus the maddy. If someone is anaerobic and they do not need the patricio then they eat the maddy. The maddy does not eat the patricio.", "logic": "\nIncandesce(patricio, maddy)\nInclose(maddy, patricio)\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> not Nonplus(x, maddy))\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Tawny(x) -> Incandesce(x, patricio))\nforall x (Incandesce(x, patricio) -> Nonplus(x, patricio))\nforall x (Inclose(x, maddy) -> Nonplus(x, patricio))\nInclose(maddy, patricio) -> Inclose(patricio, maddy)\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) and not Incandesce(x, patricio) -> Nonplus(patricio, maddy))\nforall x (Nonplus(x, patricio) -> Nonplus(patricio, maddy))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) and not Nonplus(x, patricio) -> Incandesce(x, maddy))\n\nnot Incandesce(maddy, patricio)\n\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Tawny(x) -> Incandesce(x, patricio)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The enriqueta nigrify the edmund. The edmund beam the enriqueta. If someone is citified then they do not need the edmund. If someone is crannied and arcuate then they eat the enriqueta. If someone nigrify the enriqueta then they need the enriqueta. If someone beam the edmund then they need the enriqueta. If the edmund beam the enriqueta then the enriqueta beam the edmund. If someone is citified and they do not eat the enriqueta then the enriqueta contemn the edmund. If someone contemn the enriqueta then the enriqueta contemn the edmund. If someone is citified and they do not need the enriqueta then they eat the edmund. The edmund contemn the enriqueta.", "logic": "\nNigrify(enriqueta, edmund)\nBeam(edmund, enriqueta)\nforall x (Citified(x) -> not Contemn(x, edmund))\nforall x (Crannied(x) and Arcuate(x) -> Nigrify(x, enriqueta))\nforall x (Nigrify(x, enriqueta) -> Contemn(x, enriqueta))\nforall x (Beam(x, edmund) -> Contemn(x, enriqueta))\nBeam(edmund, enriqueta) -> Beam(enriqueta, edmund)\nforall x (Citified(x) and not Nigrify(x, enriqueta) -> Contemn(enriqueta, edmund))\nforall x (Contemn(x, enriqueta) -> Contemn(enriqueta, edmund))\nforall x (Citified(x) and not Contemn(x, enriqueta) -> Nigrify(x, edmund))\n\nContemn(edmund, enriqueta)\n\nforall x (Nigrify(x, enriqueta) -> Contemn(x, enriqueta)) <- forall x (Crannied(x) and Arcuate(x) -> Nigrify(x, enriqueta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The maurita underquote the eugine. The eugine embrocate the maurita. If someone is unenrgetic then they do not need the eugine. If someone is prudential and antiquated then they eat the maurita. If someone underquote the maurita then they need the maurita. If someone embrocate the eugine then they need the maurita. If the eugine embrocate the maurita then the maurita embrocate the eugine. If someone is unenrgetic and they do not eat the maurita then the maurita misread the eugine. If someone misread the maurita then the maurita misread the eugine. If someone is unenrgetic and they do not need the maurita then they eat the eugine. The eugine is not antiquated.", "logic": "\nUnderquote(maurita, eugine)\nEmbrocate(eugine, maurita)\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) -> not Misread(x, eugine))\nforall x (Prudential(x) and Antiquated(x) -> Underquote(x, maurita))\nforall x (Underquote(x, maurita) -> Misread(x, maurita))\nforall x (Embrocate(x, eugine) -> Misread(x, maurita))\nEmbrocate(eugine, maurita) -> Embrocate(maurita, eugine)\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) and not Underquote(x, maurita) -> Misread(maurita, eugine))\nforall x (Misread(x, maurita) -> Misread(maurita, eugine))\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) and not Misread(x, maurita) -> Underquote(x, eugine))\n\nnot Antiquated(eugine)\n\nnot Antiquated(eugine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The liza acuminate the harrold. The harrold stimulate the liza. If someone is aural then they do not need the harrold. If someone is edgy and invariant then they eat the liza. If someone acuminate the liza then they need the liza. If someone stimulate the harrold then they need the liza. If the harrold stimulate the liza then the liza stimulate the harrold. If someone is aural and they do not eat the liza then the liza guillotine the harrold. If someone guillotine the liza then the liza guillotine the harrold. If someone is aural and they do not need the liza then they eat the harrold. The harrold is aural.", "logic": "\nAcuminate(liza, harrold)\nStimulate(harrold, liza)\nforall x (Aural(x) -> not Guillotine(x, harrold))\nforall x (Edgy(x) and Invariant(x) -> Acuminate(x, liza))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, liza) -> Guillotine(x, liza))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, harrold) -> Guillotine(x, liza))\nStimulate(harrold, liza) -> Stimulate(liza, harrold)\nforall x (Aural(x) and not Acuminate(x, liza) -> Guillotine(liza, harrold))\nforall x (Guillotine(x, liza) -> Guillotine(liza, harrold))\nforall x (Aural(x) and not Guillotine(x, liza) -> Acuminate(x, harrold))\n\nAural(harrold)\n\nAural(harrold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The dorry finagle the bradly. The bradly wield the dorry. If someone is tarry then they do not need the bradly. If someone is rusty and vehicular then they eat the dorry. If someone finagle the dorry then they need the dorry. If someone wield the bradly then they need the dorry. If the bradly wield the dorry then the dorry wield the bradly. If someone is tarry and they do not eat the dorry then the dorry curry the bradly. If someone curry the dorry then the dorry curry the bradly. If someone is tarry and they do not need the dorry then they eat the bradly. The dorry does not see the dorry.", "logic": "\nFinagle(dorry, bradly)\nWield(bradly, dorry)\nforall x (Tarry(x) -> not Curry(x, bradly))\nforall x (Rusty(x) and Vehicular(x) -> Finagle(x, dorry))\nforall x (Finagle(x, dorry) -> Curry(x, dorry))\nforall x (Wield(x, bradly) -> Curry(x, dorry))\nWield(bradly, dorry) -> Wield(dorry, bradly)\nforall x (Tarry(x) and not Finagle(x, dorry) -> Curry(dorry, bradly))\nforall x (Curry(x, dorry) -> Curry(dorry, bradly))\nforall x (Tarry(x) and not Curry(x, dorry) -> Finagle(x, bradly))\n\nnot Wield(dorry, dorry)\n\nnot Wield(dorry, dorry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The orsola outgo the sergent. The sergent twine the orsola. If someone is mesolithic then they do not need the sergent. If someone is alterable and bacterioid then they eat the orsola. If someone outgo the orsola then they need the orsola. If someone twine the sergent then they need the orsola. If the sergent twine the orsola then the orsola twine the sergent. If someone is mesolithic and they do not eat the orsola then the orsola cocker the sergent. If someone cocker the orsola then the orsola cocker the sergent. If someone is mesolithic and they do not need the orsola then they eat the sergent. The sergent twine the sergent.", "logic": "\nOutgo(orsola, sergent)\nTwine(sergent, orsola)\nforall x (Mesolithic(x) -> not Cocker(x, sergent))\nforall x (Alterable(x) and Bacterioid(x) -> Outgo(x, orsola))\nforall x (Outgo(x, orsola) -> Cocker(x, orsola))\nforall x (Twine(x, sergent) -> Cocker(x, orsola))\nTwine(sergent, orsola) -> Twine(orsola, sergent)\nforall x (Mesolithic(x) and not Outgo(x, orsola) -> Cocker(orsola, sergent))\nforall x (Cocker(x, orsola) -> Cocker(orsola, sergent))\nforall x (Mesolithic(x) and not Cocker(x, orsola) -> Outgo(x, sergent))\n\nTwine(sergent, sergent)\n\nTwine(sergent, sergent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "Daveta is marly. Daveta is chary. Daveta is khaki. Daveta is greyed. Dorthea is perfect. Dorthea is marly. Dorthea is chary. Dorthea is not khaki. Dorthea is not waxed. Rubina is perfect. Rubina is khaki. Rubina is inflected. All marly people are chary. White, perfect people are marly. If someone is perfect then they are greyed. Big people are greyed. If Daveta is perfect and Daveta is not inflected then Daveta is not marly. If someone is chary and not marly then they are not waxed. Dorthea is not waxed.", "logic": "\nMarly(daveta)\nChary(daveta)\nKhaki(daveta)\nGreyed(daveta)\nPerfect(dorthea)\nMarly(dorthea)\nChary(dorthea)\nnot Khaki(dorthea)\nnot Waxed(dorthea)\nPerfect(rubina)\nKhaki(rubina)\nInflected(rubina)\nforall x (Marly(x) -> Chary(x))\nforall x (Greyed(x) and Perfect(x) -> Marly(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) -> Greyed(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) -> Greyed(x))\nPerfect(daveta) and not Inflected(daveta) -> not Marly(daveta)\nforall x (Chary(x) and not Marly(x) -> not Waxed(x))\n\nnot Waxed(dorthea)\n\ntherefore not Waxed(dorthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Stefanie is insurable. Stefanie is inherent. Stefanie is bigeminal. Stefanie is resentful. Galen is healthful. Galen is insurable. Galen is inherent. Galen is not bigeminal. Galen is not inclement. Vinod is healthful. Vinod is bigeminal. Vinod is embonpoint. All insurable people are inherent. White, healthful people are insurable. If someone is healthful then they are resentful. Big people are resentful. If Stefanie is healthful and Stefanie is not embonpoint then Stefanie is not insurable. If someone is inherent and not insurable then they are not inclement. Stefanie is not insurable.", "logic": "\nInsurable(stefanie)\nInherent(stefanie)\nBigeminal(stefanie)\nResentful(stefanie)\nHealthful(galen)\nInsurable(galen)\nInherent(galen)\nnot Bigeminal(galen)\nnot Inclement(galen)\nHealthful(vinod)\nBigeminal(vinod)\nEmbonpoint(vinod)\nforall x (Insurable(x) -> Inherent(x))\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Healthful(x) -> Insurable(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Resentful(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Resentful(x))\nHealthful(stefanie) and not Embonpoint(stefanie) -> not Insurable(stefanie)\nforall x (Inherent(x) and not Insurable(x) -> not Inclement(x))\n\nnot Insurable(stefanie)\n\ntherefore Insurable(stefanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Kalman is unfunded. Kalman is unglazed. Kalman is asiatic. Kalman is deaf. Josey is indurate. Josey is unfunded. Josey is unglazed. Josey is not asiatic. Josey is not hardline. Mika is indurate. Mika is asiatic. Mika is watertight. All unfunded people are unglazed. White, indurate people are unfunded. If someone is indurate then they are deaf. Big people are deaf. If Kalman is indurate and Kalman is not watertight then Kalman is not unfunded. If someone is unglazed and not unfunded then they are not hardline. Josey is deaf.", "logic": "\nUnfunded(kalman)\nUnglazed(kalman)\nAsiatic(kalman)\nDeaf(kalman)\nIndurate(josey)\nUnfunded(josey)\nUnglazed(josey)\nnot Asiatic(josey)\nnot Hardline(josey)\nIndurate(mika)\nAsiatic(mika)\nWatertight(mika)\nforall x (Unfunded(x) -> Unglazed(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) and Indurate(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) -> Deaf(x))\nIndurate(kalman) and not Watertight(kalman) -> not Unfunded(kalman)\nforall x (Unglazed(x) and not Unfunded(x) -> not Hardline(x))\n\nDeaf(josey)\n\nIndurate(josey) and forall x (Indurate(x) -> Deaf(x)) -> therefore Deaf(josey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Joyce is racist. Joyce is mortgaged. Joyce is innovative. Joyce is globular. Karel is fuzzed. Karel is racist. Karel is mortgaged. Karel is not innovative. Karel is not epochal. Ruthe is fuzzed. Ruthe is innovative. Ruthe is geographic. All racist people are mortgaged. White, fuzzed people are racist. If someone is fuzzed then they are globular. Big people are globular. If Joyce is fuzzed and Joyce is not geographic then Joyce is not racist. If someone is mortgaged and not racist then they are not epochal. Karel is not globular.", "logic": "\nRacist(joyce)\nMortgaged(joyce)\nInnovative(joyce)\nGlobular(joyce)\nFuzzed(karel)\nRacist(karel)\nMortgaged(karel)\nnot Innovative(karel)\nnot Epochal(karel)\nFuzzed(ruthe)\nInnovative(ruthe)\nGeographic(ruthe)\nforall x (Racist(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Globular(x) and Fuzzed(x) -> Racist(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Globular(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Globular(x))\nFuzzed(joyce) and not Geographic(joyce) -> not Racist(joyce)\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) and not Racist(x) -> not Epochal(x))\n\nnot Globular(karel)\n\nFuzzed(karel) and forall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Globular(x)) -> therefore Globular(karel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Kalil is galwegian. Kalil is apetalous. Kalil is foolhardy. Kalil is pharyngeal. Joline is conjugate. Joline is galwegian. Joline is apetalous. Joline is not foolhardy. Joline is not woodsy. Sherilyn is conjugate. Sherilyn is foolhardy. Sherilyn is lanky. All galwegian people are apetalous. White, conjugate people are galwegian. If someone is conjugate then they are pharyngeal. Big people are pharyngeal. If Kalil is conjugate and Kalil is not lanky then Kalil is not galwegian. If someone is apetalous and not galwegian then they are not woodsy. Sherilyn is galwegian.", "logic": "\nGalwegian(kalil)\nApetalous(kalil)\nFoolhardy(kalil)\nPharyngeal(kalil)\nConjugate(joline)\nGalwegian(joline)\nApetalous(joline)\nnot Foolhardy(joline)\nnot Woodsy(joline)\nConjugate(sherilyn)\nFoolhardy(sherilyn)\nLanky(sherilyn)\nforall x (Galwegian(x) -> Apetalous(x))\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) and Conjugate(x) -> Galwegian(x))\nforall x (Conjugate(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Conjugate(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nConjugate(kalil) and not Lanky(kalil) -> not Galwegian(kalil)\nforall x (Apetalous(x) and not Galwegian(x) -> not Woodsy(x))\n\nGalwegian(sherilyn)\n\nConjugate(sherilyn) and forall x (Conjugate(x) -> Pharyngeal(x)) -> therefore Pharyngeal(sherilyn) Pharyngeal(sherilyn) and Conjugate(sherilyn) and forall x (Pharyngeal(x) and Conjugate(x) -> Galwegian(x)) -> therefore Galwegian(sherilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Eugene is cxlv. Eugene is metameric. Eugene is fried. Eugene is starring. Desirae is dizygous. Desirae is cxlv. Desirae is metameric. Desirae is not fried. Desirae is not correlate. Nealon is dizygous. Nealon is fried. Nealon is sabine. All cxlv people are metameric. White, dizygous people are cxlv. If someone is dizygous then they are starring. Big people are starring. If Eugene is dizygous and Eugene is not sabine then Eugene is not cxlv. If someone is metameric and not cxlv then they are not correlate. Nealon is not cxlv.", "logic": "\nCxlv(eugene)\nMetameric(eugene)\nFried(eugene)\nStarring(eugene)\nDizygous(desirae)\nCxlv(desirae)\nMetameric(desirae)\nnot Fried(desirae)\nnot Correlate(desirae)\nDizygous(nealon)\nFried(nealon)\nSabine(nealon)\nforall x (Cxlv(x) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Starring(x) and Dizygous(x) -> Cxlv(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Starring(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Starring(x))\nDizygous(eugene) and not Sabine(eugene) -> not Cxlv(eugene)\nforall x (Metameric(x) and not Cxlv(x) -> not Correlate(x))\n\nnot Cxlv(nealon)\n\nDizygous(nealon) and forall x (Dizygous(x) -> Starring(x)) -> therefore Starring(nealon) Starring(nealon) and Dizygous(nealon) and forall x (Starring(x) and Dizygous(x) -> Cxlv(x)) -> therefore Cxlv(nealon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Walter is unbarred. Walter is fuzzed. Walter is japanese. Walter is laughable. Gerold is fantastic. Gerold is unbarred. Gerold is fuzzed. Gerold is not japanese. Gerold is not concordant. Erny is fantastic. Erny is japanese. Erny is patriotic. All unbarred people are fuzzed. White, fantastic people are unbarred. If someone is fantastic then they are laughable. Big people are laughable. If Walter is fantastic and Walter is not patriotic then Walter is not unbarred. If someone is fuzzed and not unbarred then they are not concordant. Erny is fuzzed.", "logic": "\nUnbarred(walter)\nFuzzed(walter)\nJapanese(walter)\nLaughable(walter)\nFantastic(gerold)\nUnbarred(gerold)\nFuzzed(gerold)\nnot Japanese(gerold)\nnot Concordant(gerold)\nFantastic(erny)\nJapanese(erny)\nPatriotic(erny)\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Laughable(x) and Fantastic(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) -> Laughable(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) -> Laughable(x))\nFantastic(walter) and not Patriotic(walter) -> not Unbarred(walter)\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and not Unbarred(x) -> not Concordant(x))\n\nFuzzed(erny)\n\nFantastic(erny) and forall x (Fantastic(x) -> Laughable(x)) -> therefore Laughable(erny) Laughable(erny) and Fantastic(erny) and forall x (Laughable(x) and Fantastic(x) -> Unbarred(x)) -> therefore Unbarred(erny) Unbarred(erny) and forall x (Unbarred(x) -> Fuzzed(x)) -> therefore Fuzzed(erny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Crissie is polymeric. Crissie is abactinal. Crissie is mystic. Crissie is shapeless. Geneva is bulimic. Geneva is polymeric. Geneva is abactinal. Geneva is not mystic. Geneva is not murmuring. Luelle is bulimic. Luelle is mystic. Luelle is unpromised. All polymeric people are abactinal. White, bulimic people are polymeric. If someone is bulimic then they are shapeless. Big people are shapeless. If Crissie is bulimic and Crissie is not unpromised then Crissie is not polymeric. If someone is abactinal and not polymeric then they are not murmuring. Luelle is not abactinal.", "logic": "\nPolymeric(crissie)\nAbactinal(crissie)\nMystic(crissie)\nShapeless(crissie)\nBulimic(geneva)\nPolymeric(geneva)\nAbactinal(geneva)\nnot Mystic(geneva)\nnot Murmuring(geneva)\nBulimic(luelle)\nMystic(luelle)\nUnpromised(luelle)\nforall x (Polymeric(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Shapeless(x) and Bulimic(x) -> Polymeric(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nBulimic(crissie) and not Unpromised(crissie) -> not Polymeric(crissie)\nforall x (Abactinal(x) and not Polymeric(x) -> not Murmuring(x))\n\nnot Abactinal(luelle)\n\nBulimic(luelle) and forall x (Bulimic(x) -> Shapeless(x)) -> therefore Shapeless(luelle) Shapeless(luelle) and Bulimic(luelle) and forall x (Shapeless(x) and Bulimic(x) -> Polymeric(x)) -> therefore Polymeric(luelle) Polymeric(luelle) and forall x (Polymeric(x) -> Abactinal(x)) -> therefore Abactinal(luelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Phillipp is befouled. Phillipp is adult. Phillipp is saccadic. Phillipp is negative. Edmond is continuing. Edmond is befouled. Edmond is adult. Edmond is not saccadic. Edmond is not unashamed. Dian is continuing. Dian is saccadic. Dian is bardic. All befouled people are adult. White, continuing people are befouled. If someone is continuing then they are negative. Big people are negative. If Phillipp is continuing and Phillipp is not bardic then Phillipp is not befouled. If someone is adult and not befouled then they are not unashamed. Phillipp is not continuing.", "logic": "\nBefouled(phillipp)\nAdult(phillipp)\nSaccadic(phillipp)\nNegative(phillipp)\nContinuing(edmond)\nBefouled(edmond)\nAdult(edmond)\nnot Saccadic(edmond)\nnot Unashamed(edmond)\nContinuing(dian)\nSaccadic(dian)\nBardic(dian)\nforall x (Befouled(x) -> Adult(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) and Continuing(x) -> Befouled(x))\nforall x (Continuing(x) -> Negative(x))\nforall x (Continuing(x) -> Negative(x))\nContinuing(phillipp) and not Bardic(phillipp) -> not Befouled(phillipp)\nforall x (Adult(x) and not Befouled(x) -> not Unashamed(x))\n\nnot Continuing(phillipp)\n\nnot Continuing(phillipp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Agnella is unchanging. Agnella is tremulous. Agnella is dauntless. Agnella is fungoid. Cathrin is bony. Cathrin is unchanging. Cathrin is tremulous. Cathrin is not dauntless. Cathrin is not pyrolytic. Dafna is bony. Dafna is dauntless. Dafna is equal. All unchanging people are tremulous. White, bony people are unchanging. If someone is bony then they are fungoid. Big people are fungoid. If Agnella is bony and Agnella is not equal then Agnella is not unchanging. If someone is tremulous and not unchanging then they are not pyrolytic. Agnella is equal.", "logic": "\nUnchanging(agnella)\nTremulous(agnella)\nDauntless(agnella)\nFungoid(agnella)\nBony(cathrin)\nUnchanging(cathrin)\nTremulous(cathrin)\nnot Dauntless(cathrin)\nnot Pyrolytic(cathrin)\nBony(dafna)\nDauntless(dafna)\nEqual(dafna)\nforall x (Unchanging(x) -> Tremulous(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and Bony(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Bony(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Bony(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nBony(agnella) and not Equal(agnella) -> not Unchanging(agnella)\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and not Unchanging(x) -> not Pyrolytic(x))\n\nEqual(agnella)\n\nEqual(agnella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Bertram is adsorbable. Bertram is cheliceral. Bertram is cubistic. Bertram is spongy. Adolf is denuded. Adolf is adsorbable. Adolf is cheliceral. Adolf is not cubistic. Adolf is not degrading. Tuckie is denuded. Tuckie is cubistic. Tuckie is cadenced. All adsorbable people are cheliceral. White, denuded people are adsorbable. If someone is denuded then they are spongy. Big people are spongy. If Bertram is denuded and Bertram is not cadenced then Bertram is not adsorbable. If someone is cheliceral and not adsorbable then they are not degrading. Tuckie is not degrading.", "logic": "\nAdsorbable(bertram)\nCheliceral(bertram)\nCubistic(bertram)\nSpongy(bertram)\nDenuded(adolf)\nAdsorbable(adolf)\nCheliceral(adolf)\nnot Cubistic(adolf)\nnot Degrading(adolf)\nDenuded(tuckie)\nCubistic(tuckie)\nCadenced(tuckie)\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) -> Cheliceral(x))\nforall x (Spongy(x) and Denuded(x) -> Adsorbable(x))\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Spongy(x))\nDenuded(bertram) and not Cadenced(bertram) -> not Adsorbable(bertram)\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) and not Adsorbable(x) -> not Degrading(x))\n\nnot Degrading(tuckie)\n\nnot Degrading(tuckie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Melvyn is estranged. Melvyn is exploitive. Melvyn is awheel. Melvyn is unripe. Dorene is bootless. Dorene is estranged. Dorene is exploitive. Dorene is not awheel. Dorene is not caesarean. Ninetta is bootless. Ninetta is awheel. Ninetta is fanatic. All estranged people are exploitive. White, bootless people are estranged. If someone is bootless then they are unripe. Big people are unripe. If Melvyn is bootless and Melvyn is not fanatic then Melvyn is not estranged. If someone is exploitive and not estranged then they are not caesarean. Dorene is fanatic.", "logic": "\nEstranged(melvyn)\nExploitive(melvyn)\nAwheel(melvyn)\nUnripe(melvyn)\nBootless(dorene)\nEstranged(dorene)\nExploitive(dorene)\nnot Awheel(dorene)\nnot Caesarean(dorene)\nBootless(ninetta)\nAwheel(ninetta)\nFanatic(ninetta)\nforall x (Estranged(x) -> Exploitive(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Bootless(x) -> Estranged(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) -> Unripe(x))\nBootless(melvyn) and not Fanatic(melvyn) -> not Estranged(melvyn)\nforall x (Exploitive(x) and not Estranged(x) -> not Caesarean(x))\n\nFanatic(dorene)\n\nFanatic(dorene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "The pail braise the king. The hope braise the king. The king illustrate the hope. If something crane the pail then the pail is leptorhine. If something illustrate the hope then it crane the pail. If something is leptorhine and it braise the king then it crane the king. If something illustrate the pail then it is injurious. If something illustrate the hope then it is injurious. If something crane the hope then it crane the pail. If something is injurious then it braise the hope. If something braise the king then the king crane the pail. The hope braise the king.", "logic": "\nBraise(pail, king)\nBraise(hope, king)\nIllustrate(king, hope)\nforall x (Crane(x, pail) -> Leptorhine(pail))\nforall x (Illustrate(x, hope) -> Crane(x, pail))\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) and Braise(x, king) -> Crane(x, king))\nforall x (Illustrate(x, pail) -> Injurious(x))\nforall x (Illustrate(x, hope) -> Injurious(x))\nforall x (Crane(x, hope) -> Crane(x, pail))\nforall x (Injurious(x) -> Braise(x, hope))\nforall x (Braise(x, king) -> Crane(king, pail))\n\nBraise(hope, king)\n\ntherefore Braise(hope, king)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The dayle resist the kameko. The mag resist the kameko. The kameko candy the mag. If something redeposit the dayle then the dayle is rootless. If something candy the mag then it redeposit the dayle. If something is rootless and it resist the kameko then it redeposit the kameko. If something candy the dayle then it is geothermic. If something candy the mag then it is geothermic. If something redeposit the mag then it redeposit the dayle. If something is geothermic then it resist the mag. If something resist the kameko then the kameko redeposit the dayle. The mag does not like the kameko.", "logic": "\nResist(dayle, kameko)\nResist(mag, kameko)\nCandy(kameko, mag)\nforall x (Redeposit(x, dayle) -> Rootless(dayle))\nforall x (Candy(x, mag) -> Redeposit(x, dayle))\nforall x (Rootless(x) and Resist(x, kameko) -> Redeposit(x, kameko))\nforall x (Candy(x, dayle) -> Geothermic(x))\nforall x (Candy(x, mag) -> Geothermic(x))\nforall x (Redeposit(x, mag) -> Redeposit(x, dayle))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Resist(x, mag))\nforall x (Resist(x, kameko) -> Redeposit(kameko, dayle))\n\nnot Resist(mag, kameko)\n\ntherefore Resist(mag, kameko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The gerold shamanize the matthieu. The katti shamanize the matthieu. The matthieu subject the katti. If something radiate the gerold then the gerold is extendible. If something subject the katti then it radiate the gerold. If something is extendible and it shamanize the matthieu then it radiate the matthieu. If something subject the gerold then it is chicken. If something subject the katti then it is chicken. If something radiate the katti then it radiate the gerold. If something is chicken then it shamanize the katti. If something shamanize the matthieu then the matthieu radiate the gerold. The matthieu is chicken.", "logic": "\nShamanize(gerold, matthieu)\nShamanize(katti, matthieu)\nSubject(matthieu, katti)\nforall x (Radiate(x, gerold) -> Extendible(gerold))\nforall x (Subject(x, katti) -> Radiate(x, gerold))\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Shamanize(x, matthieu) -> Radiate(x, matthieu))\nforall x (Subject(x, gerold) -> Chicken(x))\nforall x (Subject(x, katti) -> Chicken(x))\nforall x (Radiate(x, katti) -> Radiate(x, gerold))\nforall x (Chicken(x) -> Shamanize(x, katti))\nforall x (Shamanize(x, matthieu) -> Radiate(matthieu, gerold))\n\nChicken(matthieu)\n\nSubject(matthieu, katti) and forall x (Subject(x, katti) -> Chicken(x)) -> therefore Chicken(matthieu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The kristel rollick the ethan. The antoni rollick the ethan. The ethan fair the antoni. If something hurl the kristel then the kristel is tactical. If something fair the antoni then it hurl the kristel. If something is tactical and it rollick the ethan then it hurl the ethan. If something fair the kristel then it is iberian. If something fair the antoni then it is iberian. If something hurl the antoni then it hurl the kristel. If something is iberian then it rollick the antoni. If something rollick the ethan then the ethan hurl the kristel. The ethan does not see the kristel.", "logic": "\nRollick(kristel, ethan)\nRollick(antoni, ethan)\nFair(ethan, antoni)\nforall x (Hurl(x, kristel) -> Tactical(kristel))\nforall x (Fair(x, antoni) -> Hurl(x, kristel))\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Rollick(x, ethan) -> Hurl(x, ethan))\nforall x (Fair(x, kristel) -> Iberian(x))\nforall x (Fair(x, antoni) -> Iberian(x))\nforall x (Hurl(x, antoni) -> Hurl(x, kristel))\nforall x (Iberian(x) -> Rollick(x, antoni))\nforall x (Rollick(x, ethan) -> Hurl(ethan, kristel))\n\nnot Hurl(ethan, kristel)\n\nRollick(kristel, ethan) and forall x (Rollick(x, ethan) -> Hurl(ethan, kristel)) -> therefore Hurl(ethan, kristel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The christel disarm the elissa. The milka disarm the elissa. The elissa rupture the milka. If something faze the christel then the christel is ribbonlike. If something rupture the milka then it faze the christel. If something is ribbonlike and it disarm the elissa then it faze the elissa. If something rupture the christel then it is reflected. If something rupture the milka then it is reflected. If something faze the milka then it faze the christel. If something is reflected then it disarm the milka. If something disarm the elissa then the elissa faze the christel. The elissa disarm the milka.", "logic": "\nDisarm(christel, elissa)\nDisarm(milka, elissa)\nRupture(elissa, milka)\nforall x (Faze(x, christel) -> Ribbonlike(christel))\nforall x (Rupture(x, milka) -> Faze(x, christel))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Disarm(x, elissa) -> Faze(x, elissa))\nforall x (Rupture(x, christel) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Rupture(x, milka) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Faze(x, milka) -> Faze(x, christel))\nforall x (Reflected(x) -> Disarm(x, milka))\nforall x (Disarm(x, elissa) -> Faze(elissa, christel))\n\nDisarm(elissa, milka)\n\nRupture(elissa, milka) and forall x (Rupture(x, milka) -> Reflected(x)) -> therefore Reflected(elissa) Reflected(elissa) and forall x (Reflected(x) -> Disarm(x, milka)) -> therefore Disarm(elissa, milka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The leola lipread the shandie. The modesta lipread the shandie. The shandie prepay the modesta. If something clothe the leola then the leola is acned. If something prepay the modesta then it clothe the leola. If something is acned and it lipread the shandie then it clothe the shandie. If something prepay the leola then it is apodous. If something prepay the modesta then it is apodous. If something clothe the modesta then it clothe the leola. If something is apodous then it lipread the modesta. If something lipread the shandie then the shandie clothe the leola. The leola is not acned.", "logic": "\nLipread(leola, shandie)\nLipread(modesta, shandie)\nPrepay(shandie, modesta)\nforall x (Clothe(x, leola) -> Acned(leola))\nforall x (Prepay(x, modesta) -> Clothe(x, leola))\nforall x (Acned(x) and Lipread(x, shandie) -> Clothe(x, shandie))\nforall x (Prepay(x, leola) -> Apodous(x))\nforall x (Prepay(x, modesta) -> Apodous(x))\nforall x (Clothe(x, modesta) -> Clothe(x, leola))\nforall x (Apodous(x) -> Lipread(x, modesta))\nforall x (Lipread(x, shandie) -> Clothe(shandie, leola))\n\nnot Acned(leola)\n\nLipread(leola, shandie) and forall x (Lipread(x, shandie) -> Clothe(shandie, leola)) -> therefore Clothe(shandie, leola) Clothe(shandie, leola) and forall x (Clothe(x, leola) -> Acned(leola)) -> therefore Acned(leola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The bridie shush the lind. The tandi shush the lind. The lind degrade the tandi. If something immunise the bridie then the bridie is lexical. If something degrade the tandi then it immunise the bridie. If something is lexical and it shush the lind then it immunise the lind. If something degrade the bridie then it is reddish. If something degrade the tandi then it is reddish. If something immunise the tandi then it immunise the bridie. If something is reddish then it shush the tandi. If something shush the lind then the lind immunise the bridie. The bridie immunise the lind.", "logic": "\nShush(bridie, lind)\nShush(tandi, lind)\nDegrade(lind, tandi)\nforall x (Immunise(x, bridie) -> Lexical(bridie))\nforall x (Degrade(x, tandi) -> Immunise(x, bridie))\nforall x (Lexical(x) and Shush(x, lind) -> Immunise(x, lind))\nforall x (Degrade(x, bridie) -> Reddish(x))\nforall x (Degrade(x, tandi) -> Reddish(x))\nforall x (Immunise(x, tandi) -> Immunise(x, bridie))\nforall x (Reddish(x) -> Shush(x, tandi))\nforall x (Shush(x, lind) -> Immunise(lind, bridie))\n\nImmunise(bridie, lind)\n\nShush(bridie, lind) and forall x (Shush(x, lind) -> Immunise(lind, bridie)) -> therefore Immunise(lind, bridie) Immunise(lind, bridie) and forall x (Immunise(x, bridie) -> Lexical(bridie)) -> therefore Lexical(bridie) Lexical(bridie) and Shush(bridie, lind) and forall x (Lexical(x) and Shush(x, lind) -> Immunise(x, lind)) -> therefore Immunise(bridie, lind)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The betteanne misguide the irvine. The lyssa misguide the irvine. The irvine floss the lyssa. If something intrigue the betteanne then the betteanne is shelled. If something floss the lyssa then it intrigue the betteanne. If something is shelled and it misguide the irvine then it intrigue the irvine. If something floss the betteanne then it is exanimate. If something floss the lyssa then it is exanimate. If something intrigue the lyssa then it intrigue the betteanne. If something is exanimate then it misguide the lyssa. If something misguide the irvine then the irvine intrigue the betteanne. The betteanne does not see the irvine.", "logic": "\nMisguide(betteanne, irvine)\nMisguide(lyssa, irvine)\nFloss(irvine, lyssa)\nforall x (Intrigue(x, betteanne) -> Shelled(betteanne))\nforall x (Floss(x, lyssa) -> Intrigue(x, betteanne))\nforall x (Shelled(x) and Misguide(x, irvine) -> Intrigue(x, irvine))\nforall x (Floss(x, betteanne) -> Exanimate(x))\nforall x (Floss(x, lyssa) -> Exanimate(x))\nforall x (Intrigue(x, lyssa) -> Intrigue(x, betteanne))\nforall x (Exanimate(x) -> Misguide(x, lyssa))\nforall x (Misguide(x, irvine) -> Intrigue(irvine, betteanne))\n\nnot Intrigue(betteanne, irvine)\n\nMisguide(betteanne, irvine) and forall x (Misguide(x, irvine) -> Intrigue(irvine, betteanne)) -> therefore Intrigue(irvine, betteanne) Intrigue(irvine, betteanne) and forall x (Intrigue(x, betteanne) -> Shelled(betteanne)) -> therefore Shelled(betteanne) Shelled(betteanne) and Misguide(betteanne, irvine) and forall x (Shelled(x) and Misguide(x, irvine) -> Intrigue(x, irvine)) -> therefore Intrigue(betteanne, irvine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The teena golf the milt. The terra golf the milt. The milt flap the terra. If something honor the teena then the teena is macedonian. If something flap the terra then it honor the teena. If something is macedonian and it golf the milt then it honor the milt. If something flap the teena then it is nitwitted. If something flap the terra then it is nitwitted. If something honor the terra then it honor the teena. If something is nitwitted then it golf the terra. If something golf the milt then the milt honor the teena. The teena does not like the terra.", "logic": "\nGolf(teena, milt)\nGolf(terra, milt)\nFlap(milt, terra)\nforall x (Honor(x, teena) -> Macedonian(teena))\nforall x (Flap(x, terra) -> Honor(x, teena))\nforall x (Macedonian(x) and Golf(x, milt) -> Honor(x, milt))\nforall x (Flap(x, teena) -> Nitwitted(x))\nforall x (Flap(x, terra) -> Nitwitted(x))\nforall x (Honor(x, terra) -> Honor(x, teena))\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Golf(x, terra))\nforall x (Golf(x, milt) -> Honor(milt, teena))\n\nnot Golf(teena, terra)\n\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Golf(x, terra)) <- forall x (Flap(x, teena) -> Nitwitted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The jody filiate the jody. The yolane filiate the jody. The jody clinch the yolane. If something clarion the jody then the jody is subjacent. If something clinch the yolane then it clarion the jody. If something is subjacent and it filiate the jody then it clarion the jody. If something clinch the jody then it is adductive. If something clinch the yolane then it is adductive. If something clarion the yolane then it clarion the jody. If something is adductive then it filiate the yolane. If something filiate the jody then the jody clarion the jody. The yolane clarion the jody.", "logic": "\nFiliate(jody, jody)\nFiliate(yolane, jody)\nClinch(jody, yolane)\nforall x (Clarion(x, jody) -> Subjacent(jody))\nforall x (Clinch(x, yolane) -> Clarion(x, jody))\nforall x (Subjacent(x) and Filiate(x, jody) -> Clarion(x, jody))\nforall x (Clinch(x, jody) -> Adductive(x))\nforall x (Clinch(x, yolane) -> Adductive(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x, yolane) -> Clarion(x, jody))\nforall x (Adductive(x) -> Filiate(x, yolane))\nforall x (Filiate(x, jody) -> Clarion(jody, jody))\n\nClarion(yolane, jody)\n\nforall x (Clinch(x, yolane) -> Clarion(x, jody)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The delphinia nitrate the sebastien. The nickolas nitrate the sebastien. The sebastien repoint the nickolas. If something yield the delphinia then the delphinia is stout. If something repoint the nickolas then it yield the delphinia. If something is stout and it nitrate the sebastien then it yield the sebastien. If something repoint the delphinia then it is ironshod. If something repoint the nickolas then it is ironshod. If something yield the nickolas then it yield the delphinia. If something is ironshod then it nitrate the nickolas. If something nitrate the sebastien then the sebastien yield the delphinia. The nickolas is not ironshod.", "logic": "\nNitrate(delphinia, sebastien)\nNitrate(nickolas, sebastien)\nRepoint(sebastien, nickolas)\nforall x (Yield(x, delphinia) -> Stout(delphinia))\nforall x (Repoint(x, nickolas) -> Yield(x, delphinia))\nforall x (Stout(x) and Nitrate(x, sebastien) -> Yield(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Repoint(x, delphinia) -> Ironshod(x))\nforall x (Repoint(x, nickolas) -> Ironshod(x))\nforall x (Yield(x, nickolas) -> Yield(x, delphinia))\nforall x (Ironshod(x) -> Nitrate(x, nickolas))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, sebastien) -> Yield(sebastien, delphinia))\n\nnot Ironshod(nickolas)\n\nforall x (Repoint(x, delphinia) -> Ironshod(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The liz unclothe the matthus. The esteban unclothe the matthus. The matthus poison the esteban. If something frogmarch the liz then the liz is elaborated. If something poison the esteban then it frogmarch the liz. If something is elaborated and it unclothe the matthus then it frogmarch the matthus. If something poison the liz then it is rapacious. If something poison the esteban then it is rapacious. If something frogmarch the esteban then it frogmarch the liz. If something is rapacious then it unclothe the esteban. If something unclothe the matthus then the matthus frogmarch the liz. The matthus frogmarch the matthus.", "logic": "\nUnclothe(liz, matthus)\nUnclothe(esteban, matthus)\nPoison(matthus, esteban)\nforall x (Frogmarch(x, liz) -> Elaborated(liz))\nforall x (Poison(x, esteban) -> Frogmarch(x, liz))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and Unclothe(x, matthus) -> Frogmarch(x, matthus))\nforall x (Poison(x, liz) -> Rapacious(x))\nforall x (Poison(x, esteban) -> Rapacious(x))\nforall x (Frogmarch(x, esteban) -> Frogmarch(x, liz))\nforall x (Rapacious(x) -> Unclothe(x, esteban))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, matthus) -> Frogmarch(matthus, liz))\n\nFrogmarch(matthus, matthus)\n\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and Unclothe(x, matthus) -> Frogmarch(x, matthus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The dina abuse the valeda. The marney abuse the valeda. The valeda recall the marney. If something subsume the dina then the dina is pink. If something recall the marney then it subsume the dina. If something is pink and it abuse the valeda then it subsume the valeda. If something recall the dina then it is bleached. If something recall the marney then it is bleached. If something subsume the marney then it subsume the dina. If something is bleached then it abuse the marney. If something abuse the valeda then the valeda subsume the dina. The dina is not round.", "logic": "\nAbuse(dina, valeda)\nAbuse(marney, valeda)\nRecall(valeda, marney)\nforall x (Subsume(x, dina) -> Pink(dina))\nforall x (Recall(x, marney) -> Subsume(x, dina))\nforall x (Pink(x) and Abuse(x, valeda) -> Subsume(x, valeda))\nforall x (Recall(x, dina) -> Bleached(x))\nforall x (Recall(x, marney) -> Bleached(x))\nforall x (Subsume(x, marney) -> Subsume(x, dina))\nforall x (Bleached(x) -> Abuse(x, marney))\nforall x (Abuse(x, valeda) -> Subsume(valeda, dina))\n\nnot Round(dina)\n\nnot Round(dina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The phylis swarm the amalia. The tomlin swarm the amalia. The amalia revolt the tomlin. If something inhabit the phylis then the phylis is trilobed. If something revolt the tomlin then it inhabit the phylis. If something is trilobed and it swarm the amalia then it inhabit the amalia. If something revolt the phylis then it is botchy. If something revolt the tomlin then it is botchy. If something inhabit the tomlin then it inhabit the phylis. If something is botchy then it swarm the tomlin. If something swarm the amalia then the amalia inhabit the phylis. The tomlin is trilobed.", "logic": "\nSwarm(phylis, amalia)\nSwarm(tomlin, amalia)\nRevolt(amalia, tomlin)\nforall x (Inhabit(x, phylis) -> Trilobed(phylis))\nforall x (Revolt(x, tomlin) -> Inhabit(x, phylis))\nforall x (Trilobed(x) and Swarm(x, amalia) -> Inhabit(x, amalia))\nforall x (Revolt(x, phylis) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Revolt(x, tomlin) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Inhabit(x, tomlin) -> Inhabit(x, phylis))\nforall x (Botchy(x) -> Swarm(x, tomlin))\nforall x (Swarm(x, amalia) -> Inhabit(amalia, phylis))\n\nTrilobed(tomlin)\n\nTrilobed(tomlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The sonnnie unscramble the siward. The enrico unscramble the siward. The siward cradle the enrico. If something flunk the sonnnie then the sonnnie is optic. If something cradle the enrico then it flunk the sonnnie. If something is optic and it unscramble the siward then it flunk the siward. If something cradle the sonnnie then it is buttony. If something cradle the enrico then it is buttony. If something flunk the enrico then it flunk the sonnnie. If something is buttony then it unscramble the enrico. If something unscramble the siward then the siward flunk the sonnnie. The siward does not see the enrico.", "logic": "\nUnscramble(sonnnie, siward)\nUnscramble(enrico, siward)\nCradle(siward, enrico)\nforall x (Flunk(x, sonnnie) -> Optic(sonnnie))\nforall x (Cradle(x, enrico) -> Flunk(x, sonnnie))\nforall x (Optic(x) and Unscramble(x, siward) -> Flunk(x, siward))\nforall x (Cradle(x, sonnnie) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Cradle(x, enrico) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Flunk(x, enrico) -> Flunk(x, sonnnie))\nforall x (Buttony(x) -> Unscramble(x, enrico))\nforall x (Unscramble(x, siward) -> Flunk(siward, sonnnie))\n\nnot Flunk(siward, enrico)\n\nnot Flunk(siward, enrico) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The alice urticate the agustin. The hedwig urticate the agustin. The agustin misdate the hedwig. If something monetise the alice then the alice is rheumatoid. If something misdate the hedwig then it monetise the alice. If something is rheumatoid and it urticate the agustin then it monetise the agustin. If something misdate the alice then it is admissible. If something misdate the hedwig then it is admissible. If something monetise the hedwig then it monetise the alice. If something is admissible then it urticate the hedwig. If something urticate the agustin then the agustin monetise the alice. The alice is rough.", "logic": "\nUrticate(alice, agustin)\nUrticate(hedwig, agustin)\nMisdate(agustin, hedwig)\nforall x (Monetise(x, alice) -> Rheumatoid(alice))\nforall x (Misdate(x, hedwig) -> Monetise(x, alice))\nforall x (Rheumatoid(x) and Urticate(x, agustin) -> Monetise(x, agustin))\nforall x (Misdate(x, alice) -> Admissible(x))\nforall x (Misdate(x, hedwig) -> Admissible(x))\nforall x (Monetise(x, hedwig) -> Monetise(x, alice))\nforall x (Admissible(x) -> Urticate(x, hedwig))\nforall x (Urticate(x, agustin) -> Monetise(agustin, alice))\n\nRough(alice)\n\nRough(alice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The dorelle is adamant. The dorelle defog the abbott. The kellia interlope the dorelle. The kellia defog the dorelle. The kellia defog the abbott. The kellia mope the abbott. The abbott defog the kellia. If something mope the kellia then the kellia is zonary. If something is spirituous then it interlope the abbott. If something defog the kellia then it defog the abbott. If something is zonary then it mope the dorelle. If the dorelle mope the kellia then the dorelle is adamant. If something is unseemly then it mope the kellia. If something defog the abbott then it is spirituous. If something mope the abbott then the abbott interlope the kellia. The abbott defog the kellia.", "logic": "\nAdamant(dorelle)\nDefog(dorelle, abbott)\nInterlope(kellia, dorelle)\nDefog(kellia, dorelle)\nDefog(kellia, abbott)\nMope(kellia, abbott)\nDefog(abbott, kellia)\nforall x (Mope(x, kellia) -> Zonary(kellia))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> Interlope(x, abbott))\nforall x (Defog(x, kellia) -> Defog(x, abbott))\nforall x (Zonary(x) -> Mope(x, dorelle))\nMope(dorelle, kellia) -> Adamant(dorelle)\nforall x (Unseemly(x) -> Mope(x, kellia))\nforall x (Defog(x, abbott) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Mope(x, abbott) -> Interlope(abbott, kellia))\n\nDefog(abbott, kellia)\n\ntherefore Defog(abbott, kellia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The alphonso is doubtful. The alphonso squeal the clo. The tamarah datemark the alphonso. The tamarah squeal the alphonso. The tamarah squeal the clo. The tamarah lean the clo. The clo squeal the tamarah. If something lean the tamarah then the tamarah is corny. If something is defeasible then it datemark the clo. If something squeal the tamarah then it squeal the clo. If something is corny then it lean the alphonso. If the alphonso lean the tamarah then the alphonso is doubtful. If something is starry then it lean the tamarah. If something squeal the clo then it is defeasible. If something lean the clo then the clo datemark the tamarah. The tamarah does not eat the alphonso.", "logic": "\nDoubtful(alphonso)\nSqueal(alphonso, clo)\nDatemark(tamarah, alphonso)\nSqueal(tamarah, alphonso)\nSqueal(tamarah, clo)\nLean(tamarah, clo)\nSqueal(clo, tamarah)\nforall x (Lean(x, tamarah) -> Corny(tamarah))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) -> Datemark(x, clo))\nforall x (Squeal(x, tamarah) -> Squeal(x, clo))\nforall x (Corny(x) -> Lean(x, alphonso))\nLean(alphonso, tamarah) -> Doubtful(alphonso)\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Lean(x, tamarah))\nforall x (Squeal(x, clo) -> Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Lean(x, clo) -> Datemark(clo, tamarah))\n\nnot Datemark(tamarah, alphonso)\n\ntherefore Datemark(tamarah, alphonso)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The ashish is fisheye. The ashish button the jennine. The viole spotlight the ashish. The viole button the ashish. The viole button the jennine. The viole repurchase the jennine. The jennine button the viole. If something repurchase the viole then the viole is aldermanic. If something is gemmed then it spotlight the jennine. If something button the viole then it button the jennine. If something is aldermanic then it repurchase the ashish. If the ashish repurchase the viole then the ashish is fisheye. If something is smashing then it repurchase the viole. If something button the jennine then it is gemmed. If something repurchase the jennine then the jennine spotlight the viole. The ashish is gemmed.", "logic": "\nFisheye(ashish)\nButton(ashish, jennine)\nSpotlight(viole, ashish)\nButton(viole, ashish)\nButton(viole, jennine)\nRepurchase(viole, jennine)\nButton(jennine, viole)\nforall x (Repurchase(x, viole) -> Aldermanic(viole))\nforall x (Gemmed(x) -> Spotlight(x, jennine))\nforall x (Button(x, viole) -> Button(x, jennine))\nforall x (Aldermanic(x) -> Repurchase(x, ashish))\nRepurchase(ashish, viole) -> Fisheye(ashish)\nforall x (Smashing(x) -> Repurchase(x, viole))\nforall x (Button(x, jennine) -> Gemmed(x))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, jennine) -> Spotlight(jennine, viole))\n\nGemmed(ashish)\n\nButton(ashish, jennine) and forall x (Button(x, jennine) -> Gemmed(x)) -> therefore Gemmed(ashish)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The alton is heathenish. The alton gallivant the romeo. The vaughan burlesque the alton. The vaughan gallivant the alton. The vaughan gallivant the romeo. The vaughan present the romeo. The romeo gallivant the vaughan. If something present the vaughan then the vaughan is expectant. If something is benign then it burlesque the romeo. If something gallivant the vaughan then it gallivant the romeo. If something is expectant then it present the alton. If the alton present the vaughan then the alton is heathenish. If something is impressive then it present the vaughan. If something gallivant the romeo then it is benign. If something present the romeo then the romeo burlesque the vaughan. The alton is not benign.", "logic": "\nHeathenish(alton)\nGallivant(alton, romeo)\nBurlesque(vaughan, alton)\nGallivant(vaughan, alton)\nGallivant(vaughan, romeo)\nPresent(vaughan, romeo)\nGallivant(romeo, vaughan)\nforall x (Present(x, vaughan) -> Expectant(vaughan))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Burlesque(x, romeo))\nforall x (Gallivant(x, vaughan) -> Gallivant(x, romeo))\nforall x (Expectant(x) -> Present(x, alton))\nPresent(alton, vaughan) -> Heathenish(alton)\nforall x (Impressive(x) -> Present(x, vaughan))\nforall x (Gallivant(x, romeo) -> Benign(x))\nforall x (Present(x, romeo) -> Burlesque(romeo, vaughan))\n\nnot Benign(alton)\n\nGallivant(alton, romeo) and forall x (Gallivant(x, romeo) -> Benign(x)) -> therefore Benign(alton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The cyrus is schematic. The cyrus pound the kia. The clerissa daunt the cyrus. The clerissa pound the cyrus. The clerissa pound the kia. The clerissa powderize the kia. The kia pound the clerissa. If something powderize the clerissa then the clerissa is thenar. If something is soprano then it daunt the kia. If something pound the clerissa then it pound the kia. If something is thenar then it powderize the cyrus. If the cyrus powderize the clerissa then the cyrus is schematic. If something is overhead then it powderize the clerissa. If something pound the kia then it is soprano. If something powderize the kia then the kia daunt the clerissa. The kia is soprano.", "logic": "\nSchematic(cyrus)\nPound(cyrus, kia)\nDaunt(clerissa, cyrus)\nPound(clerissa, cyrus)\nPound(clerissa, kia)\nPowderize(clerissa, kia)\nPound(kia, clerissa)\nforall x (Powderize(x, clerissa) -> Thenar(clerissa))\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> Daunt(x, kia))\nforall x (Pound(x, clerissa) -> Pound(x, kia))\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Powderize(x, cyrus))\nPowderize(cyrus, clerissa) -> Schematic(cyrus)\nforall x (Overhead(x) -> Powderize(x, clerissa))\nforall x (Pound(x, kia) -> Soprano(x))\nforall x (Powderize(x, kia) -> Daunt(kia, clerissa))\n\nSoprano(kia)\n\nPound(kia, clerissa) and forall x (Pound(x, clerissa) -> Pound(x, kia)) -> therefore Pound(kia, kia) Pound(kia, kia) and forall x (Pound(x, kia) -> Soprano(x)) -> therefore Soprano(kia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The derk is degenerate. The derk offend the kimberlee. The uta fertilize the derk. The uta offend the derk. The uta offend the kimberlee. The uta scar the kimberlee. The kimberlee offend the uta. If something scar the uta then the uta is gallican. If something is achenial then it fertilize the kimberlee. If something offend the uta then it offend the kimberlee. If something is gallican then it scar the derk. If the derk scar the uta then the derk is degenerate. If something is mastered then it scar the uta. If something offend the kimberlee then it is achenial. If something scar the kimberlee then the kimberlee fertilize the uta. The kimberlee is not achenial.", "logic": "\nDegenerate(derk)\nOffend(derk, kimberlee)\nFertilize(uta, derk)\nOffend(uta, derk)\nOffend(uta, kimberlee)\nScar(uta, kimberlee)\nOffend(kimberlee, uta)\nforall x (Scar(x, uta) -> Gallican(uta))\nforall x (Achenial(x) -> Fertilize(x, kimberlee))\nforall x (Offend(x, uta) -> Offend(x, kimberlee))\nforall x (Gallican(x) -> Scar(x, derk))\nScar(derk, uta) -> Degenerate(derk)\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Scar(x, uta))\nforall x (Offend(x, kimberlee) -> Achenial(x))\nforall x (Scar(x, kimberlee) -> Fertilize(kimberlee, uta))\n\nnot Achenial(kimberlee)\n\nOffend(kimberlee, uta) and forall x (Offend(x, uta) -> Offend(x, kimberlee)) -> therefore Offend(kimberlee, kimberlee) Offend(kimberlee, kimberlee) and forall x (Offend(x, kimberlee) -> Achenial(x)) -> therefore Achenial(kimberlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The tedi is roasted. The tedi extend the leonard. The peirce frizzle the tedi. The peirce extend the tedi. The peirce extend the leonard. The peirce pother the leonard. The leonard extend the peirce. If something pother the peirce then the peirce is grave. If something is proficient then it frizzle the leonard. If something extend the peirce then it extend the leonard. If something is grave then it pother the tedi. If the tedi pother the peirce then the tedi is roasted. If something is acinar then it pother the peirce. If something extend the leonard then it is proficient. If something pother the leonard then the leonard frizzle the peirce. The leonard frizzle the leonard.", "logic": "\nRoasted(tedi)\nExtend(tedi, leonard)\nFrizzle(peirce, tedi)\nExtend(peirce, tedi)\nExtend(peirce, leonard)\nPother(peirce, leonard)\nExtend(leonard, peirce)\nforall x (Pother(x, peirce) -> Grave(peirce))\nforall x (Proficient(x) -> Frizzle(x, leonard))\nforall x (Extend(x, peirce) -> Extend(x, leonard))\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Pother(x, tedi))\nPother(tedi, peirce) -> Roasted(tedi)\nforall x (Acinar(x) -> Pother(x, peirce))\nforall x (Extend(x, leonard) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Pother(x, leonard) -> Frizzle(leonard, peirce))\n\nFrizzle(leonard, leonard)\n\nExtend(leonard, peirce) and forall x (Extend(x, peirce) -> Extend(x, leonard)) -> therefore Extend(leonard, leonard) Extend(leonard, leonard) and forall x (Extend(x, leonard) -> Proficient(x)) -> therefore Proficient(leonard) Proficient(leonard) and forall x (Proficient(x) -> Frizzle(x, leonard)) -> therefore Frizzle(leonard, leonard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The rahal is theocratic. The rahal sublime the dugan. The oneida treble the rahal. The oneida sublime the rahal. The oneida sublime the dugan. The oneida begild the dugan. The dugan sublime the oneida. If something begild the oneida then the oneida is otic. If something is useful then it treble the dugan. If something sublime the oneida then it sublime the dugan. If something is otic then it begild the rahal. If the rahal begild the oneida then the rahal is theocratic. If something is loathsome then it begild the oneida. If something sublime the dugan then it is useful. If something begild the dugan then the dugan treble the oneida. The dugan does not eat the dugan.", "logic": "\nTheocratic(rahal)\nSublime(rahal, dugan)\nTreble(oneida, rahal)\nSublime(oneida, rahal)\nSublime(oneida, dugan)\nBegild(oneida, dugan)\nSublime(dugan, oneida)\nforall x (Begild(x, oneida) -> Otic(oneida))\nforall x (Useful(x) -> Treble(x, dugan))\nforall x (Sublime(x, oneida) -> Sublime(x, dugan))\nforall x (Otic(x) -> Begild(x, rahal))\nBegild(rahal, oneida) -> Theocratic(rahal)\nforall x (Loathsome(x) -> Begild(x, oneida))\nforall x (Sublime(x, dugan) -> Useful(x))\nforall x (Begild(x, dugan) -> Treble(dugan, oneida))\n\nnot Treble(dugan, dugan)\n\nSublime(dugan, oneida) and forall x (Sublime(x, oneida) -> Sublime(x, dugan)) -> therefore Sublime(dugan, dugan) Sublime(dugan, dugan) and forall x (Sublime(x, dugan) -> Useful(x)) -> therefore Useful(dugan) Useful(dugan) and forall x (Useful(x) -> Treble(x, dugan)) -> therefore Treble(dugan, dugan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The waneta is dyadic. The waneta knock the vaclav. The charis widow the waneta. The charis knock the waneta. The charis knock the vaclav. The charis borrow the vaclav. The vaclav knock the charis. If something borrow the charis then the charis is steadied. If something is heuristic then it widow the vaclav. If something knock the charis then it knock the vaclav. If something is steadied then it borrow the waneta. If the waneta borrow the charis then the waneta is dyadic. If something is obtuse then it borrow the charis. If something knock the vaclav then it is heuristic. If something borrow the vaclav then the vaclav widow the charis. The charis does not see the waneta.", "logic": "\nDyadic(waneta)\nKnock(waneta, vaclav)\nWidow(charis, waneta)\nKnock(charis, waneta)\nKnock(charis, vaclav)\nBorrow(charis, vaclav)\nKnock(vaclav, charis)\nforall x (Borrow(x, charis) -> Steadied(charis))\nforall x (Heuristic(x) -> Widow(x, vaclav))\nforall x (Knock(x, charis) -> Knock(x, vaclav))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Borrow(x, waneta))\nBorrow(waneta, charis) -> Dyadic(waneta)\nforall x (Obtuse(x) -> Borrow(x, charis))\nforall x (Knock(x, vaclav) -> Heuristic(x))\nforall x (Borrow(x, vaclav) -> Widow(vaclav, charis))\n\nnot Borrow(charis, waneta)\n\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Borrow(x, waneta)) <- forall x (Borrow(x, charis) -> Steadied(charis)) <- forall x (Obtuse(x) -> Borrow(x, charis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The sonia is unfed. The sonia rubric the glori. The giovanni waterproof the sonia. The giovanni rubric the sonia. The giovanni rubric the glori. The giovanni mute the glori. The glori rubric the giovanni. If something mute the giovanni then the giovanni is diamantine. If something is bigeneric then it waterproof the glori. If something rubric the giovanni then it rubric the glori. If something is diamantine then it mute the sonia. If the sonia mute the giovanni then the sonia is unfed. If something is factorial then it mute the giovanni. If something rubric the glori then it is bigeneric. If something mute the glori then the glori waterproof the giovanni. The giovanni mute the giovanni.", "logic": "\nUnfed(sonia)\nRubric(sonia, glori)\nWaterproof(giovanni, sonia)\nRubric(giovanni, sonia)\nRubric(giovanni, glori)\nMute(giovanni, glori)\nRubric(glori, giovanni)\nforall x (Mute(x, giovanni) -> Diamantine(giovanni))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Waterproof(x, glori))\nforall x (Rubric(x, giovanni) -> Rubric(x, glori))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) -> Mute(x, sonia))\nMute(sonia, giovanni) -> Unfed(sonia)\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> Mute(x, giovanni))\nforall x (Rubric(x, glori) -> Bigeneric(x))\nforall x (Mute(x, glori) -> Waterproof(glori, giovanni))\n\nMute(giovanni, giovanni)\n\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> Mute(x, giovanni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The averyl is carboxyl. The averyl disqualify the amber. The maryellen purloin the averyl. The maryellen disqualify the averyl. The maryellen disqualify the amber. The maryellen strafe the amber. The amber disqualify the maryellen. If something strafe the maryellen then the maryellen is hornlike. If something is hairy then it purloin the amber. If something disqualify the maryellen then it disqualify the amber. If something is hornlike then it strafe the averyl. If the averyl strafe the maryellen then the averyl is carboxyl. If something is bicornuous then it strafe the maryellen. If something disqualify the amber then it is hairy. If something strafe the amber then the amber purloin the maryellen. The amber does not see the averyl.", "logic": "\nCarboxyl(averyl)\nDisqualify(averyl, amber)\nPurloin(maryellen, averyl)\nDisqualify(maryellen, averyl)\nDisqualify(maryellen, amber)\nStrafe(maryellen, amber)\nDisqualify(amber, maryellen)\nforall x (Strafe(x, maryellen) -> Hornlike(maryellen))\nforall x (Hairy(x) -> Purloin(x, amber))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, maryellen) -> Disqualify(x, amber))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) -> Strafe(x, averyl))\nStrafe(averyl, maryellen) -> Carboxyl(averyl)\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Strafe(x, maryellen))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, amber) -> Hairy(x))\nforall x (Strafe(x, amber) -> Purloin(amber, maryellen))\n\nnot Strafe(amber, averyl)\n\nforall x (Hornlike(x) -> Strafe(x, averyl)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The benetta is ruthful. The benetta devalue the dorette. The sanford untune the benetta. The sanford devalue the benetta. The sanford devalue the dorette. The sanford satisfy the dorette. The dorette devalue the sanford. If something satisfy the sanford then the sanford is syncopated. If something is politic then it untune the dorette. If something devalue the sanford then it devalue the dorette. If something is syncopated then it satisfy the benetta. If the benetta satisfy the sanford then the benetta is ruthful. If something is aliform then it satisfy the sanford. If something devalue the dorette then it is politic. If something satisfy the dorette then the dorette untune the sanford. The dorette satisfy the sanford.", "logic": "\nRuthful(benetta)\nDevalue(benetta, dorette)\nUntune(sanford, benetta)\nDevalue(sanford, benetta)\nDevalue(sanford, dorette)\nSatisfy(sanford, dorette)\nDevalue(dorette, sanford)\nforall x (Satisfy(x, sanford) -> Syncopated(sanford))\nforall x (Politic(x) -> Untune(x, dorette))\nforall x (Devalue(x, sanford) -> Devalue(x, dorette))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Satisfy(x, benetta))\nSatisfy(benetta, sanford) -> Ruthful(benetta)\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Satisfy(x, sanford))\nforall x (Devalue(x, dorette) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Satisfy(x, dorette) -> Untune(dorette, sanford))\n\nSatisfy(dorette, sanford)\n\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Satisfy(x, sanford)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The pammi is assaultive. The pammi cadge the gaby. The axel faze the pammi. The axel cadge the pammi. The axel cadge the gaby. The axel contrive the gaby. The gaby cadge the axel. If something contrive the axel then the axel is faddish. If something is cohesive then it faze the gaby. If something cadge the axel then it cadge the gaby. If something is faddish then it contrive the pammi. If the pammi contrive the axel then the pammi is assaultive. If something is pulseless then it contrive the axel. If something cadge the gaby then it is cohesive. If something contrive the gaby then the gaby faze the axel. The pammi does not see the gaby.", "logic": "\nAssaultive(pammi)\nCadge(pammi, gaby)\nFaze(axel, pammi)\nCadge(axel, pammi)\nCadge(axel, gaby)\nContrive(axel, gaby)\nCadge(gaby, axel)\nforall x (Contrive(x, axel) -> Faddish(axel))\nforall x (Cohesive(x) -> Faze(x, gaby))\nforall x (Cadge(x, axel) -> Cadge(x, gaby))\nforall x (Faddish(x) -> Contrive(x, pammi))\nContrive(pammi, axel) -> Assaultive(pammi)\nforall x (Pulseless(x) -> Contrive(x, axel))\nforall x (Cadge(x, gaby) -> Cohesive(x))\nforall x (Contrive(x, gaby) -> Faze(gaby, axel))\n\nnot Contrive(pammi, gaby)\n\nnot Contrive(pammi, gaby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The elijah is asat. The elijah surrender the malynda. The garth enquire the elijah. The garth surrender the elijah. The garth surrender the malynda. The garth sight the malynda. The malynda surrender the garth. If something sight the garth then the garth is solemn. If something is monatomic then it enquire the malynda. If something surrender the garth then it surrender the malynda. If something is solemn then it sight the elijah. If the elijah sight the garth then the elijah is asat. If something is hind then it sight the garth. If something surrender the malynda then it is monatomic. If something sight the malynda then the malynda enquire the garth. The elijah is nice.", "logic": "\nAsat(elijah)\nSurrender(elijah, malynda)\nEnquire(garth, elijah)\nSurrender(garth, elijah)\nSurrender(garth, malynda)\nSight(garth, malynda)\nSurrender(malynda, garth)\nforall x (Sight(x, garth) -> Solemn(garth))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) -> Enquire(x, malynda))\nforall x (Surrender(x, garth) -> Surrender(x, malynda))\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Sight(x, elijah))\nSight(elijah, garth) -> Asat(elijah)\nforall x (Hind(x) -> Sight(x, garth))\nforall x (Surrender(x, malynda) -> Monatomic(x))\nforall x (Sight(x, malynda) -> Enquire(malynda, garth))\n\nNice(elijah)\n\nNice(elijah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The zilvia is directing. The zilvia quarter the chrysa. The marley heliograph the zilvia. The marley quarter the zilvia. The marley quarter the chrysa. The marley exert the chrysa. The chrysa quarter the marley. If something exert the marley then the marley is woolly. If something is julian then it heliograph the chrysa. If something quarter the marley then it quarter the chrysa. If something is woolly then it exert the zilvia. If the zilvia exert the marley then the zilvia is directing. If something is aetiologic then it exert the marley. If something quarter the chrysa then it is julian. If something exert the chrysa then the chrysa heliograph the marley. The zilvia does not eat the zilvia.", "logic": "\nDirecting(zilvia)\nQuarter(zilvia, chrysa)\nHeliograph(marley, zilvia)\nQuarter(marley, zilvia)\nQuarter(marley, chrysa)\nExert(marley, chrysa)\nQuarter(chrysa, marley)\nforall x (Exert(x, marley) -> Woolly(marley))\nforall x (Julian(x) -> Heliograph(x, chrysa))\nforall x (Quarter(x, marley) -> Quarter(x, chrysa))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Exert(x, zilvia))\nExert(zilvia, marley) -> Directing(zilvia)\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Exert(x, marley))\nforall x (Quarter(x, chrysa) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Exert(x, chrysa) -> Heliograph(chrysa, marley))\n\nnot Heliograph(zilvia, zilvia)\n\nnot Heliograph(zilvia, zilvia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The connor is digitate. The connor dogfight the trevar. The guinna embroil the connor. The guinna dogfight the connor. The guinna dogfight the trevar. The guinna hinge the trevar. The trevar dogfight the guinna. If something hinge the guinna then the guinna is mingy. If something is transpolar then it embroil the trevar. If something dogfight the guinna then it dogfight the trevar. If something is mingy then it hinge the connor. If the connor hinge the guinna then the connor is digitate. If something is depilatory then it hinge the guinna. If something dogfight the trevar then it is transpolar. If something hinge the trevar then the trevar embroil the guinna. The trevar dogfight the connor.", "logic": "\nDigitate(connor)\nDogfight(connor, trevar)\nEmbroil(guinna, connor)\nDogfight(guinna, connor)\nDogfight(guinna, trevar)\nHinge(guinna, trevar)\nDogfight(trevar, guinna)\nforall x (Hinge(x, guinna) -> Mingy(guinna))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> Embroil(x, trevar))\nforall x (Dogfight(x, guinna) -> Dogfight(x, trevar))\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> Hinge(x, connor))\nHinge(connor, guinna) -> Digitate(connor)\nforall x (Depilatory(x) -> Hinge(x, guinna))\nforall x (Dogfight(x, trevar) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Hinge(x, trevar) -> Embroil(trevar, guinna))\n\nDogfight(trevar, connor)\n\nDogfight(trevar, connor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The walden is hammy. If something is tenacious and not hammy then it is unalloyed. Red, bespoke things are unalloyed. If something is unraised and not hammy then it is bespoke. If something is unraised then it is bespoke. All tenacious things are bespoke. Nice, tenacious things are unraised. Big things are unraised. If something is unraised then it is tenacious. The walden is hammy.", "logic": "\nHammy(walden)\nforall x (Tenacious(x) and not Hammy(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) and Bespoke(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) and not Hammy(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) and Tenacious(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> Tenacious(x))\n\nHammy(walden)\n\ntherefore Hammy(walden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The zachariah is germicidal. If something is togged and not germicidal then it is easterly. Red, cohesive things are easterly. If something is exanimate and not germicidal then it is cohesive. If something is exanimate then it is cohesive. All togged things are cohesive. Nice, togged things are exanimate. Big things are exanimate. If something is exanimate then it is togged. The zachariah is not germicidal.", "logic": "\nGermicidal(zachariah)\nforall x (Togged(x) and not Germicidal(x) -> Easterly(x))\nforall x (Togged(x) and Cohesive(x) -> Easterly(x))\nforall x (Exanimate(x) and not Germicidal(x) -> Cohesive(x))\nforall x (Exanimate(x) -> Cohesive(x))\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Cohesive(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) and Togged(x) -> Exanimate(x))\nforall x (Germicidal(x) -> Exanimate(x))\nforall x (Exanimate(x) -> Togged(x))\n\nnot Germicidal(zachariah)\n\ntherefore Germicidal(zachariah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The dulcea is cespitose. If something is palladian and not cespitose then it is unhygienic. Red, decurved things are unhygienic. If something is idempotent and not cespitose then it is decurved. If something is idempotent then it is decurved. All palladian things are decurved. Nice, palladian things are idempotent. Big things are idempotent. If something is idempotent then it is palladian. The dulcea is idempotent.", "logic": "\nCespitose(dulcea)\nforall x (Palladian(x) and not Cespitose(x) -> Unhygienic(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) and Decurved(x) -> Unhygienic(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) and not Cespitose(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Decurved(x))\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) and Palladian(x) -> Idempotent(x))\nforall x (Cespitose(x) -> Idempotent(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) -> Palladian(x))\n\nIdempotent(dulcea)\n\nCespitose(dulcea) and forall x (Cespitose(x) -> Idempotent(x)) -> therefore Idempotent(dulcea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The kit is piano. If something is slavish and not piano then it is crackle. Red, xlvii things are crackle. If something is strapless and not piano then it is xlvii. If something is strapless then it is xlvii. All slavish things are xlvii. Nice, slavish things are strapless. Big things are strapless. If something is strapless then it is slavish. The kit is not strapless.", "logic": "\nPiano(kit)\nforall x (Slavish(x) and not Piano(x) -> Crackle(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Xlvii(x) -> Crackle(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) and not Piano(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Crackle(x) and Slavish(x) -> Strapless(x))\nforall x (Piano(x) -> Strapless(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) -> Slavish(x))\n\nnot Strapless(kit)\n\nPiano(kit) and forall x (Piano(x) -> Strapless(x)) -> therefore Strapless(kit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The happy is barbellate. If something is libyan and not barbellate then it is impolite. Red, talky things are impolite. If something is hazardous and not barbellate then it is talky. If something is hazardous then it is talky. All libyan things are talky. Nice, libyan things are hazardous. Big things are hazardous. If something is hazardous then it is libyan. The happy is libyan.", "logic": "\nBarbellate(happy)\nforall x (Libyan(x) and not Barbellate(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) and Talky(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) and not Barbellate(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Impolite(x) and Libyan(x) -> Hazardous(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Hazardous(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) -> Libyan(x))\n\nLibyan(happy)\n\nBarbellate(happy) and forall x (Barbellate(x) -> Hazardous(x)) -> therefore Hazardous(happy) Hazardous(happy) and forall x (Hazardous(x) -> Libyan(x)) -> therefore Libyan(happy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The waverly is aslant. If something is perceived and not aslant then it is sobersided. Red, facile things are sobersided. If something is endermatic and not aslant then it is facile. If something is endermatic then it is facile. All perceived things are facile. Nice, perceived things are endermatic. Big things are endermatic. If something is endermatic then it is perceived. The waverly is not perceived.", "logic": "\nAslant(waverly)\nforall x (Perceived(x) and not Aslant(x) -> Sobersided(x))\nforall x (Perceived(x) and Facile(x) -> Sobersided(x))\nforall x (Endermatic(x) and not Aslant(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Perceived(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) and Perceived(x) -> Endermatic(x))\nforall x (Aslant(x) -> Endermatic(x))\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Perceived(x))\n\nnot Perceived(waverly)\n\nAslant(waverly) and forall x (Aslant(x) -> Endermatic(x)) -> therefore Endermatic(waverly) Endermatic(waverly) and forall x (Endermatic(x) -> Perceived(x)) -> therefore Perceived(waverly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The keriann is gifted. If something is mandatory and not gifted then it is nonexempt. Red, comforting things are nonexempt. If something is laudable and not gifted then it is comforting. If something is laudable then it is comforting. All mandatory things are comforting. Nice, mandatory things are laudable. Big things are laudable. If something is laudable then it is mandatory. The keriann is nonexempt.", "logic": "\nGifted(keriann)\nforall x (Mandatory(x) and not Gifted(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) and Comforting(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\nforall x (Laudable(x) and not Gifted(x) -> Comforting(x))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Comforting(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) -> Comforting(x))\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Laudable(x))\nforall x (Gifted(x) -> Laudable(x))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Mandatory(x))\n\nNonexempt(keriann)\n\nGifted(keriann) and forall x (Gifted(x) -> Laudable(x)) -> therefore Laudable(keriann) Laudable(keriann) and forall x (Laudable(x) -> Mandatory(x)) -> therefore Mandatory(keriann) Gifted(keriann) and forall x (Gifted(x) -> Laudable(x)) -> therefore Laudable(keriann) Laudable(keriann) and forall x (Laudable(x) -> Comforting(x)) -> therefore Comforting(keriann) Mandatory(keriann) and Comforting(keriann) and forall x (Mandatory(x) and Comforting(x) -> Nonexempt(x)) -> therefore Nonexempt(keriann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The galina is pinioned. If something is handled and not pinioned then it is meatless. Red, binuclear things are meatless. If something is stillborn and not pinioned then it is binuclear. If something is stillborn then it is binuclear. All handled things are binuclear. Nice, handled things are stillborn. Big things are stillborn. If something is stillborn then it is handled. The galina is not meatless.", "logic": "\nPinioned(galina)\nforall x (Handled(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Meatless(x))\nforall x (Handled(x) and Binuclear(x) -> Meatless(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Handled(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Meatless(x) and Handled(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Handled(x))\n\nnot Meatless(galina)\n\nPinioned(galina) and forall x (Pinioned(x) -> Stillborn(x)) -> therefore Stillborn(galina) Stillborn(galina) and forall x (Stillborn(x) -> Handled(x)) -> therefore Handled(galina) Pinioned(galina) and forall x (Pinioned(x) -> Stillborn(x)) -> therefore Stillborn(galina) Stillborn(galina) and forall x (Stillborn(x) -> Binuclear(x)) -> therefore Binuclear(galina) Handled(galina) and Binuclear(galina) and forall x (Handled(x) and Binuclear(x) -> Meatless(x)) -> therefore Meatless(galina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The silvanus is unexpended. If something is steadied and not unexpended then it is precedent. Red, shrewd things are precedent. If something is freaky and not unexpended then it is shrewd. If something is freaky then it is shrewd. All steadied things are shrewd. Nice, steadied things are freaky. Big things are freaky. If something is freaky then it is steadied. The silvanus does not chase the silvanus.", "logic": "\nUnexpended(silvanus)\nforall x (Steadied(x) and not Unexpended(x) -> Precedent(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) and Shrewd(x) -> Precedent(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) and not Unexpended(x) -> Shrewd(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) -> Shrewd(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Shrewd(x))\nforall x (Precedent(x) and Steadied(x) -> Freaky(x))\nforall x (Unexpended(x) -> Freaky(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) -> Steadied(x))\n\nnot Chases(silvanus, silvanus)\n\nnot Chases(silvanus, silvanus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The dulsea is irregular. If something is airsick and not irregular then it is unkept. Red, whopping things are unkept. If something is untrodden and not irregular then it is whopping. If something is untrodden then it is whopping. All airsick things are whopping. Nice, airsick things are untrodden. Big things are untrodden. If something is untrodden then it is airsick. The dulsea sees the dulsea.", "logic": "\nIrregular(dulsea)\nforall x (Airsick(x) and not Irregular(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Airsick(x) and Whopping(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Untrodden(x) and not Irregular(x) -> Whopping(x))\nforall x (Untrodden(x) -> Whopping(x))\nforall x (Airsick(x) -> Whopping(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) and Airsick(x) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Untrodden(x) -> Airsick(x))\n\nSees(dulsea, dulsea)\n\nSees(dulsea, dulsea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Augie is remarkable. Lissy is remarkable. Shayla is iodised. Jaclin is spicy. All remarkable things are iodised. Green, iodised things are dwarfish. Cold, touristy things are polysemous. If Lissy is roily then Lissy is remarkable. Smart things are touristy. White things are remarkable. If Augie is dwarfish then Augie is roily. Furry, touristy things are spicy. Lissy is remarkable.", "logic": "\nRemarkable(augie)\nRemarkable(lissy)\nIodised(shayla)\nSpicy(jaclin)\nforall x (Remarkable(x) -> Iodised(x))\nforall x (Remarkable(x) and Iodised(x) -> Dwarfish(x))\nforall x (Dwarfish(x) and Touristy(x) -> Polysemous(x))\nRoily(lissy) -> Remarkable(lissy)\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Polysemous(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nDwarfish(augie) -> Roily(augie)\nforall x (Iodised(x) and Touristy(x) -> Spicy(x))\n\nRemarkable(lissy)\n\ntherefore Remarkable(lissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Simonette is lengthwise. Nidia is lengthwise. Gladys is faddish. Janaye is detested. All lengthwise things are faddish. Green, faddish things are slapdash. Cold, murmurous things are capetian. If Nidia is full then Nidia is lengthwise. Smart things are murmurous. White things are lengthwise. If Simonette is slapdash then Simonette is full. Furry, murmurous things are detested. Simonette is not lengthwise.", "logic": "\nLengthwise(simonette)\nLengthwise(nidia)\nFaddish(gladys)\nDetested(janaye)\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) -> Faddish(x))\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) and Faddish(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Slapdash(x) and Murmurous(x) -> Capetian(x))\nFull(nidia) -> Lengthwise(nidia)\nforall x (Full(x) -> Murmurous(x))\nforall x (Capetian(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nSlapdash(simonette) -> Full(simonette)\nforall x (Faddish(x) and Murmurous(x) -> Detested(x))\n\nnot Lengthwise(simonette)\n\ntherefore Lengthwise(simonette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Dottie is pilotless. Tucker is pilotless. Becki is feverous. Chloris is appellant. All pilotless things are feverous. Green, feverous things are faveolate. Cold, metonymic things are average. If Tucker is scholarly then Tucker is pilotless. Smart things are metonymic. White things are pilotless. If Dottie is faveolate then Dottie is scholarly. Furry, metonymic things are appellant. Tucker is feverous.", "logic": "\nPilotless(dottie)\nPilotless(tucker)\nFeverous(becki)\nAppellant(chloris)\nforall x (Pilotless(x) -> Feverous(x))\nforall x (Pilotless(x) and Feverous(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Faveolate(x) and Metonymic(x) -> Average(x))\nScholarly(tucker) -> Pilotless(tucker)\nforall x (Scholarly(x) -> Metonymic(x))\nforall x (Average(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nFaveolate(dottie) -> Scholarly(dottie)\nforall x (Feverous(x) and Metonymic(x) -> Appellant(x))\n\nFeverous(tucker)\n\nPilotless(tucker) and forall x (Pilotless(x) -> Feverous(x)) -> therefore Feverous(tucker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Prent is surd. Aurora is surd. Angeline is carotid. Melony is fastigiate. All surd things are carotid. Green, carotid things are cedarn. Cold, curving things are revengeful. If Aurora is beheaded then Aurora is surd. Smart things are curving. White things are surd. If Prent is cedarn then Prent is beheaded. Furry, curving things are fastigiate. Prent is not carotid.", "logic": "\nSurd(prent)\nSurd(aurora)\nCarotid(angeline)\nFastigiate(melony)\nforall x (Surd(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) and Carotid(x) -> Cedarn(x))\nforall x (Cedarn(x) and Curving(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nBeheaded(aurora) -> Surd(aurora)\nforall x (Beheaded(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) -> Surd(x))\nCedarn(prent) -> Beheaded(prent)\nforall x (Carotid(x) and Curving(x) -> Fastigiate(x))\n\nnot Carotid(prent)\n\nSurd(prent) and forall x (Surd(x) -> Carotid(x)) -> therefore Carotid(prent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Craig is marxist. Margit is marxist. Carmine is aching. Suzzy is mesozoic. All marxist things are aching. Green, aching things are temporal. Cold, mawkish things are allocable. If Margit is squinting then Margit is marxist. Smart things are mawkish. White things are marxist. If Craig is temporal then Craig is squinting. Furry, mawkish things are mesozoic. Craig is temporal.", "logic": "\nMarxist(craig)\nMarxist(margit)\nAching(carmine)\nMesozoic(suzzy)\nforall x (Marxist(x) -> Aching(x))\nforall x (Marxist(x) and Aching(x) -> Temporal(x))\nforall x (Temporal(x) and Mawkish(x) -> Allocable(x))\nSquinting(margit) -> Marxist(margit)\nforall x (Squinting(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Allocable(x) -> Marxist(x))\nTemporal(craig) -> Squinting(craig)\nforall x (Aching(x) and Mawkish(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\n\nTemporal(craig)\n\nMarxist(craig) and forall x (Marxist(x) -> Aching(x)) -> therefore Aching(craig) Marxist(craig) and Aching(craig) and forall x (Marxist(x) and Aching(x) -> Temporal(x)) -> therefore Temporal(craig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Kayla is landlocked. Lockwood is landlocked. Jeramie is ropey. Lawson is osseous. All landlocked things are ropey. Green, ropey things are flaxen. Cold, pokey things are possible. If Lockwood is bossy then Lockwood is landlocked. Smart things are pokey. White things are landlocked. If Kayla is flaxen then Kayla is bossy. Furry, pokey things are osseous. Kayla is not flaxen.", "logic": "\nLandlocked(kayla)\nLandlocked(lockwood)\nRopey(jeramie)\nOsseous(lawson)\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Ropey(x))\nforall x (Landlocked(x) and Ropey(x) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) and Pokey(x) -> Possible(x))\nBossy(lockwood) -> Landlocked(lockwood)\nforall x (Bossy(x) -> Pokey(x))\nforall x (Possible(x) -> Landlocked(x))\nFlaxen(kayla) -> Bossy(kayla)\nforall x (Ropey(x) and Pokey(x) -> Osseous(x))\n\nnot Flaxen(kayla)\n\nLandlocked(kayla) and forall x (Landlocked(x) -> Ropey(x)) -> therefore Ropey(kayla) Landlocked(kayla) and Ropey(kayla) and forall x (Landlocked(x) and Ropey(x) -> Flaxen(x)) -> therefore Flaxen(kayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Marquita is uncombable. Stoddard is uncombable. Derek is sharing. Chet is precast. All uncombable things are sharing. Green, sharing things are propellent. Cold, untwisted things are possible. If Stoddard is aortal then Stoddard is uncombable. Smart things are untwisted. White things are uncombable. If Marquita is propellent then Marquita is aortal. Furry, untwisted things are precast. Marquita is aortal.", "logic": "\nUncombable(marquita)\nUncombable(stoddard)\nSharing(derek)\nPrecast(chet)\nforall x (Uncombable(x) -> Sharing(x))\nforall x (Uncombable(x) and Sharing(x) -> Propellent(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Untwisted(x) -> Possible(x))\nAortal(stoddard) -> Uncombable(stoddard)\nforall x (Aortal(x) -> Untwisted(x))\nforall x (Possible(x) -> Uncombable(x))\nPropellent(marquita) -> Aortal(marquita)\nforall x (Sharing(x) and Untwisted(x) -> Precast(x))\n\nAortal(marquita)\n\nUncombable(marquita) and forall x (Uncombable(x) -> Sharing(x)) -> therefore Sharing(marquita) Uncombable(marquita) and Sharing(marquita) and forall x (Uncombable(x) and Sharing(x) -> Propellent(x)) -> therefore Propellent(marquita) Propellent(marquita) and Propellent(marquita) -> Aortal(marquita) -> therefore Aortal(marquita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Vanya is circadian. Justine is circadian. Shelagh is brainy. Renie is carbonyl. All circadian things are brainy. Green, brainy things are hardback. Cold, oleophobic things are pectineal. If Justine is foul then Justine is circadian. Smart things are oleophobic. White things are circadian. If Vanya is hardback then Vanya is foul. Furry, oleophobic things are carbonyl. Vanya is not foul.", "logic": "\nCircadian(vanya)\nCircadian(justine)\nBrainy(shelagh)\nCarbonyl(renie)\nforall x (Circadian(x) -> Brainy(x))\nforall x (Circadian(x) and Brainy(x) -> Hardback(x))\nforall x (Hardback(x) and Oleophobic(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nFoul(justine) -> Circadian(justine)\nforall x (Foul(x) -> Oleophobic(x))\nforall x (Pectineal(x) -> Circadian(x))\nHardback(vanya) -> Foul(vanya)\nforall x (Brainy(x) and Oleophobic(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\n\nnot Foul(vanya)\n\nCircadian(vanya) and forall x (Circadian(x) -> Brainy(x)) -> therefore Brainy(vanya) Circadian(vanya) and Brainy(vanya) and forall x (Circadian(x) and Brainy(x) -> Hardback(x)) -> therefore Hardback(vanya) Hardback(vanya) and Hardback(vanya) -> Foul(vanya) -> therefore Foul(vanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Fitz is usual. Catlin is usual. Talia is valued. Henka is conductive. All usual things are valued. Green, valued things are both. Cold, juristic things are amitotic. If Catlin is destined then Catlin is usual. Smart things are juristic. White things are usual. If Fitz is both then Fitz is destined. Furry, juristic things are conductive. Talia is not conductive.", "logic": "\nUsual(fitz)\nUsual(catlin)\nValued(talia)\nConductive(henka)\nforall x (Usual(x) -> Valued(x))\nforall x (Usual(x) and Valued(x) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Both(x) and Juristic(x) -> Amitotic(x))\nDestined(catlin) -> Usual(catlin)\nforall x (Destined(x) -> Juristic(x))\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Usual(x))\nBoth(fitz) -> Destined(fitz)\nforall x (Valued(x) and Juristic(x) -> Conductive(x))\n\nnot Conductive(talia)\n\nforall x (Valued(x) and Juristic(x) -> Conductive(x)) <- forall x (Destined(x) -> Juristic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Anais is adherent. Helge is adherent. Licha is rumansh. Edouard is slashing. All adherent things are rumansh. Green, rumansh things are gilled. Cold, vocational things are apomictic. If Helge is insanitary then Helge is adherent. Smart things are vocational. White things are adherent. If Anais is gilled then Anais is insanitary. Furry, vocational things are slashing. Helge is apomictic.", "logic": "\nAdherent(anais)\nAdherent(helge)\nRumansh(licha)\nSlashing(edouard)\nforall x (Adherent(x) -> Rumansh(x))\nforall x (Adherent(x) and Rumansh(x) -> Gilled(x))\nforall x (Gilled(x) and Vocational(x) -> Apomictic(x))\nInsanitary(helge) -> Adherent(helge)\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Vocational(x))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) -> Adherent(x))\nGilled(anais) -> Insanitary(anais)\nforall x (Rumansh(x) and Vocational(x) -> Slashing(x))\n\nApomictic(helge)\n\nforall x (Gilled(x) and Vocational(x) -> Apomictic(x)) <- forall x (Insanitary(x) -> Vocational(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Penrod is concentric. Orton is concentric. Manon is reputable. Elli is governing. All concentric things are reputable. Green, reputable things are lengthy. Cold, laotian things are proustian. If Orton is accusing then Orton is concentric. Smart things are laotian. White things are concentric. If Penrod is lengthy then Penrod is accusing. Furry, laotian things are governing. Elli is not proustian.", "logic": "\nConcentric(penrod)\nConcentric(orton)\nReputable(manon)\nGoverning(elli)\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> Reputable(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) and Reputable(x) -> Lengthy(x))\nforall x (Lengthy(x) and Laotian(x) -> Proustian(x))\nAccusing(orton) -> Concentric(orton)\nforall x (Accusing(x) -> Laotian(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Concentric(x))\nLengthy(penrod) -> Accusing(penrod)\nforall x (Reputable(x) and Laotian(x) -> Governing(x))\n\nnot Proustian(elli)\n\nforall x (Lengthy(x) and Laotian(x) -> Proustian(x)) <- forall x (Accusing(x) -> Laotian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Westley is unfrosted. Victoria is unfrosted. Anissa is smelly. Tabor is utilized. All unfrosted things are smelly. Green, smelly things are trying. Cold, contracted things are neapolitan. If Victoria is draining then Victoria is unfrosted. Smart things are contracted. White things are unfrosted. If Westley is trying then Westley is draining. Furry, contracted things are utilized. Tabor is smelly.", "logic": "\nUnfrosted(westley)\nUnfrosted(victoria)\nSmelly(anissa)\nUtilized(tabor)\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and Smelly(x) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Trying(x) and Contracted(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\nDraining(victoria) -> Unfrosted(victoria)\nforall x (Draining(x) -> Contracted(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nTrying(westley) -> Draining(westley)\nforall x (Smelly(x) and Contracted(x) -> Utilized(x))\n\nSmelly(tabor)\n\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) -> Smelly(x)) <- forall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Unfrosted(x)) <- forall x (Trying(x) and Contracted(x) -> Neapolitan(x)) <- forall x (Unfrosted(x) and Smelly(x) -> Trying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Kendre is charnel. Godfree is charnel. Claudio is holey. Harrold is left. All charnel things are holey. Green, holey things are adulterant. Cold, archaistic things are exciting. If Godfree is enumerable then Godfree is charnel. Smart things are archaistic. White things are charnel. If Kendre is adulterant then Kendre is enumerable. Furry, archaistic things are left. Harrold is not enumerable.", "logic": "\nCharnel(kendre)\nCharnel(godfree)\nHoley(claudio)\nLeft(harrold)\nforall x (Charnel(x) -> Holey(x))\nforall x (Charnel(x) and Holey(x) -> Adulterant(x))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Exciting(x))\nEnumerable(godfree) -> Charnel(godfree)\nforall x (Enumerable(x) -> Archaistic(x))\nforall x (Exciting(x) -> Charnel(x))\nAdulterant(kendre) -> Enumerable(kendre)\nforall x (Holey(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Left(x))\n\nnot Enumerable(harrold)\n\nnot Enumerable(harrold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Lynn is boxlike. Bambi is boxlike. Rebbecca is fimbriate. Darien is antiviral. All boxlike things are fimbriate. Green, fimbriate things are euphonical. Cold, osmotic things are crocked. If Bambi is refractile then Bambi is boxlike. Smart things are osmotic. White things are boxlike. If Lynn is euphonical then Lynn is refractile. Furry, osmotic things are antiviral. Rebbecca is refractile.", "logic": "\nBoxlike(lynn)\nBoxlike(bambi)\nFimbriate(rebbecca)\nAntiviral(darien)\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Fimbriate(x))\nforall x (Boxlike(x) and Fimbriate(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Euphonical(x) and Osmotic(x) -> Crocked(x))\nRefractile(bambi) -> Boxlike(bambi)\nforall x (Refractile(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Crocked(x) -> Boxlike(x))\nEuphonical(lynn) -> Refractile(lynn)\nforall x (Fimbriate(x) and Osmotic(x) -> Antiviral(x))\n\nRefractile(rebbecca)\n\nRefractile(rebbecca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Vance is sickish. Leif is unoiled. Trenna is casuistic. Gabe is cervical. If something is sickish then it is cervical. Smart, unoiled things are sickish. If something is gyroscopic and adjunct then it is sickish. If Gabe is gyroscopic and Gabe is casuistic then Gabe is cervical. All cervical things are gyroscopic. All gyroscopic, sickish things are casuistic. Gabe is cervical.", "logic": "\nSickish(vance)\nUnoiled(leif)\nCasuistic(trenna)\nCervical(gabe)\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Cervical(x) and Unoiled(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) and Adjunct(x) -> Sickish(x))\nGyroscopic(gabe) and Casuistic(gabe) -> Cervical(gabe)\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) and Sickish(x) -> Casuistic(x))\n\nCervical(gabe)\n\ntherefore Cervical(gabe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Gwenny is integrated. Auroora is epizoic. Heinz is unservile. Koressa is rattled. If something is integrated then it is rattled. Smart, epizoic things are integrated. If something is toeless and mandean then it is integrated. If Koressa is toeless and Koressa is unservile then Koressa is rattled. All rattled things are toeless. All toeless, integrated things are unservile. Gwenny is not integrated.", "logic": "\nIntegrated(gwenny)\nEpizoic(auroora)\nUnservile(heinz)\nRattled(koressa)\nforall x (Integrated(x) -> Rattled(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) and Epizoic(x) -> Integrated(x))\nforall x (Toeless(x) and Mandean(x) -> Integrated(x))\nToeless(koressa) and Unservile(koressa) -> Rattled(koressa)\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Toeless(x))\nforall x (Toeless(x) and Integrated(x) -> Unservile(x))\n\nnot Integrated(gwenny)\n\ntherefore Integrated(gwenny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Elwyn is potbellied. Engracia is meridional. Chevalier is viscous. Sapphira is sumptuary. If something is potbellied then it is sumptuary. Smart, meridional things are potbellied. If something is forehanded and amnionic then it is potbellied. If Sapphira is forehanded and Sapphira is viscous then Sapphira is sumptuary. All sumptuary things are forehanded. All forehanded, potbellied things are viscous. Sapphira is forehanded.", "logic": "\nPotbellied(elwyn)\nMeridional(engracia)\nViscous(chevalier)\nSumptuary(sapphira)\nforall x (Potbellied(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Sumptuary(x) and Meridional(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Amnionic(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nForehanded(sapphira) and Viscous(sapphira) -> Sumptuary(sapphira)\nforall x (Sumptuary(x) -> Forehanded(x))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Viscous(x))\n\nForehanded(sapphira)\n\nSumptuary(sapphira) and forall x (Sumptuary(x) -> Forehanded(x)) -> therefore Forehanded(sapphira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Umeko is jammed. Reese is marketable. Gordon is veridical. Ruben is incensed. If something is jammed then it is incensed. Smart, marketable things are jammed. If something is manky and acerate then it is jammed. If Ruben is manky and Ruben is veridical then Ruben is incensed. All incensed things are manky. All manky, jammed things are veridical. Ruben is not manky.", "logic": "\nJammed(umeko)\nMarketable(reese)\nVeridical(gordon)\nIncensed(ruben)\nforall x (Jammed(x) -> Incensed(x))\nforall x (Incensed(x) and Marketable(x) -> Jammed(x))\nforall x (Manky(x) and Acerate(x) -> Jammed(x))\nManky(ruben) and Veridical(ruben) -> Incensed(ruben)\nforall x (Incensed(x) -> Manky(x))\nforall x (Manky(x) and Jammed(x) -> Veridical(x))\n\nnot Manky(ruben)\n\nIncensed(ruben) and forall x (Incensed(x) -> Manky(x)) -> therefore Manky(ruben)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Abbie is salverform. Claus is tiresome. Trever is immortal. Joelle is distinct. If something is salverform then it is distinct. Smart, tiresome things are salverform. If something is dialectic and unsubdued then it is salverform. If Joelle is dialectic and Joelle is immortal then Joelle is distinct. All distinct things are dialectic. All dialectic, salverform things are immortal. Abbie is dialectic.", "logic": "\nSalverform(abbie)\nTiresome(claus)\nImmortal(trever)\nDistinct(joelle)\nforall x (Salverform(x) -> Distinct(x))\nforall x (Distinct(x) and Tiresome(x) -> Salverform(x))\nforall x (Dialectic(x) and Unsubdued(x) -> Salverform(x))\nDialectic(joelle) and Immortal(joelle) -> Distinct(joelle)\nforall x (Distinct(x) -> Dialectic(x))\nforall x (Dialectic(x) and Salverform(x) -> Immortal(x))\n\nDialectic(abbie)\n\nSalverform(abbie) and forall x (Salverform(x) -> Distinct(x)) -> therefore Distinct(abbie) Distinct(abbie) and forall x (Distinct(x) -> Dialectic(x)) -> therefore Dialectic(abbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Franky is plantar. Tadd is antitumour. Hynda is fueled. Rainer is palmlike. If something is plantar then it is palmlike. Smart, antitumour things are plantar. If something is unchecked and camp then it is plantar. If Rainer is unchecked and Rainer is fueled then Rainer is palmlike. All palmlike things are unchecked. All unchecked, plantar things are fueled. Franky is not unchecked.", "logic": "\nPlantar(franky)\nAntitumour(tadd)\nFueled(hynda)\nPalmlike(rainer)\nforall x (Plantar(x) -> Palmlike(x))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) and Antitumour(x) -> Plantar(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) and Camp(x) -> Plantar(x))\nUnchecked(rainer) and Fueled(rainer) -> Palmlike(rainer)\nforall x (Palmlike(x) -> Unchecked(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) and Plantar(x) -> Fueled(x))\n\nnot Unchecked(franky)\n\nPlantar(franky) and forall x (Plantar(x) -> Palmlike(x)) -> therefore Palmlike(franky) Palmlike(franky) and forall x (Palmlike(x) -> Unchecked(x)) -> therefore Unchecked(franky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Walton is miniature. Myrna is autogamous. Avrit is acaudate. Anabel is wizened. If something is miniature then it is wizened. Smart, autogamous things are miniature. If something is vapourish and siliceous then it is miniature. If Anabel is vapourish and Anabel is acaudate then Anabel is wizened. All wizened things are vapourish. All vapourish, miniature things are acaudate. Walton is acaudate.", "logic": "\nMiniature(walton)\nAutogamous(myrna)\nAcaudate(avrit)\nWizened(anabel)\nforall x (Miniature(x) -> Wizened(x))\nforall x (Wizened(x) and Autogamous(x) -> Miniature(x))\nforall x (Vapourish(x) and Siliceous(x) -> Miniature(x))\nVapourish(anabel) and Acaudate(anabel) -> Wizened(anabel)\nforall x (Wizened(x) -> Vapourish(x))\nforall x (Vapourish(x) and Miniature(x) -> Acaudate(x))\n\nAcaudate(walton)\n\nMiniature(walton) and forall x (Miniature(x) -> Wizened(x)) -> therefore Wizened(walton) Wizened(walton) and forall x (Wizened(x) -> Vapourish(x)) -> therefore Vapourish(walton) Vapourish(walton) and Miniature(walton) and forall x (Vapourish(x) and Miniature(x) -> Acaudate(x)) -> therefore Acaudate(walton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Adelaide is droll. Diana is wobbly. Izzi is recursive. Modestine is upcurved. If something is droll then it is upcurved. Smart, wobbly things are droll. If something is official and bibliotic then it is droll. If Modestine is official and Modestine is recursive then Modestine is upcurved. All upcurved things are official. All official, droll things are recursive. Adelaide is not recursive.", "logic": "\nDroll(adelaide)\nWobbly(diana)\nRecursive(izzi)\nUpcurved(modestine)\nforall x (Droll(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Wobbly(x) -> Droll(x))\nforall x (Official(x) and Bibliotic(x) -> Droll(x))\nOfficial(modestine) and Recursive(modestine) -> Upcurved(modestine)\nforall x (Upcurved(x) -> Official(x))\nforall x (Official(x) and Droll(x) -> Recursive(x))\n\nnot Recursive(adelaide)\n\nDroll(adelaide) and forall x (Droll(x) -> Upcurved(x)) -> therefore Upcurved(adelaide) Upcurved(adelaide) and forall x (Upcurved(x) -> Official(x)) -> therefore Official(adelaide) Official(adelaide) and Droll(adelaide) and forall x (Official(x) and Droll(x) -> Recursive(x)) -> therefore Recursive(adelaide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Austin is diadromous. Hayden is bivariate. Catarina is leaning. Skipper is toothed. If something is diadromous then it is toothed. Smart, bivariate things are diadromous. If something is ecumenic and roguish then it is diadromous. If Skipper is ecumenic and Skipper is leaning then Skipper is toothed. All toothed things are ecumenic. All ecumenic, diadromous things are leaning. Skipper is not diadromous.", "logic": "\nDiadromous(austin)\nBivariate(hayden)\nLeaning(catarina)\nToothed(skipper)\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Toothed(x))\nforall x (Toothed(x) and Bivariate(x) -> Diadromous(x))\nforall x (Ecumenic(x) and Roguish(x) -> Diadromous(x))\nEcumenic(skipper) and Leaning(skipper) -> Toothed(skipper)\nforall x (Toothed(x) -> Ecumenic(x))\nforall x (Ecumenic(x) and Diadromous(x) -> Leaning(x))\n\nnot Diadromous(skipper)\n\nforall x (Toothed(x) and Bivariate(x) -> Diadromous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Tobe is detected. Peg is ironshod. Antonie is defeasible. Garvy is anaclinal. If something is detected then it is anaclinal. Smart, ironshod things are detected. If something is unread and basinal then it is detected. If Garvy is unread and Garvy is defeasible then Garvy is anaclinal. All anaclinal things are unread. All unread, detected things are defeasible. Antonie is anaclinal.", "logic": "\nDetected(tobe)\nIronshod(peg)\nDefeasible(antonie)\nAnaclinal(garvy)\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Anaclinal(x))\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) and Ironshod(x) -> Detected(x))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Basinal(x) -> Detected(x))\nUnread(garvy) and Defeasible(garvy) -> Anaclinal(garvy)\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) -> Unread(x))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Detected(x) -> Defeasible(x))\n\nAnaclinal(antonie)\n\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Anaclinal(x)) <- forall x (Anaclinal(x) and Ironshod(x) -> Detected(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Klarika is clumsy. Naomi is cowardly. Emmalynn is lunisolar. Dannye is sneezy. If something is clumsy then it is sneezy. Smart, cowardly things are clumsy. If something is jeweled and loathsome then it is clumsy. If Dannye is jeweled and Dannye is lunisolar then Dannye is sneezy. All sneezy things are jeweled. All jeweled, clumsy things are lunisolar. Naomi is not jeweled.", "logic": "\nClumsy(klarika)\nCowardly(naomi)\nLunisolar(emmalynn)\nSneezy(dannye)\nforall x (Clumsy(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) and Cowardly(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and Loathsome(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nJeweled(dannye) and Lunisolar(dannye) -> Sneezy(dannye)\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and Clumsy(x) -> Lunisolar(x))\n\nnot Jeweled(naomi)\n\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Jeweled(x)) <- forall x (Clumsy(x) -> Sneezy(x)) <- forall x (Sneezy(x) and Cowardly(x) -> Clumsy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Dion is duodecimal. Trixie is uncomplete. Scarlet is dyed. Diamond is tonguelike. If something is duodecimal then it is tonguelike. Smart, uncomplete things are duodecimal. If something is clement and tillable then it is duodecimal. If Diamond is clement and Diamond is dyed then Diamond is tonguelike. All tonguelike things are clement. All clement, duodecimal things are dyed. Trixie is tonguelike.", "logic": "\nDuodecimal(dion)\nUncomplete(trixie)\nDyed(scarlet)\nTonguelike(diamond)\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) and Uncomplete(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\nforall x (Clement(x) and Tillable(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\nClement(diamond) and Dyed(diamond) -> Tonguelike(diamond)\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Clement(x))\nforall x (Clement(x) and Duodecimal(x) -> Dyed(x))\n\nTonguelike(trixie)\n\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> Tonguelike(x)) <- forall x (Tonguelike(x) and Uncomplete(x) -> Duodecimal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Lianne is cottony. Karil is palatine. Bambie is parrotlike. Charlott is known. If something is cottony then it is known. Smart, palatine things are cottony. If something is leglike and excessive then it is cottony. If Charlott is leglike and Charlott is parrotlike then Charlott is known. All known things are leglike. All leglike, cottony things are parrotlike. Karil is not excessive.", "logic": "\nCottony(lianne)\nPalatine(karil)\nParrotlike(bambie)\nKnown(charlott)\nforall x (Cottony(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Known(x) and Palatine(x) -> Cottony(x))\nforall x (Leglike(x) and Excessive(x) -> Cottony(x))\nLeglike(charlott) and Parrotlike(charlott) -> Known(charlott)\nforall x (Known(x) -> Leglike(x))\nforall x (Leglike(x) and Cottony(x) -> Parrotlike(x))\n\nnot Excessive(karil)\n\nnot Excessive(karil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Shalne is parasitic. Dona is declarable. Del is overnice. Elana is cephalic. If something is parasitic then it is cephalic. Smart, declarable things are parasitic. If something is calculous and expiratory then it is parasitic. If Elana is calculous and Elana is overnice then Elana is cephalic. All cephalic things are calculous. All calculous, parasitic things are overnice. Elana is expiratory.", "logic": "\nParasitic(shalne)\nDeclarable(dona)\nOvernice(del)\nCephalic(elana)\nforall x (Parasitic(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Cephalic(x) and Declarable(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) and Expiratory(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nCalculous(elana) and Overnice(elana) -> Cephalic(elana)\nforall x (Cephalic(x) -> Calculous(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) and Parasitic(x) -> Overnice(x))\n\nExpiratory(elana)\n\nExpiratory(elana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Sim is armlike. Leslie is embryonal. Alvira is swedish. Glory is tenable. If something is armlike then it is tenable. Smart, embryonal things are armlike. If something is xxxiv and sheetlike then it is armlike. If Glory is xxxiv and Glory is swedish then Glory is tenable. All tenable things are xxxiv. All xxxiv, armlike things are swedish. Glory is not cold.", "logic": "\nArmlike(sim)\nEmbryonal(leslie)\nSwedish(alvira)\nTenable(glory)\nforall x (Armlike(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) and Embryonal(x) -> Armlike(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Sheetlike(x) -> Armlike(x))\nXxxiv(glory) and Swedish(glory) -> Tenable(glory)\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Xxxiv(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Armlike(x) -> Swedish(x))\n\nnot Cold(glory)\n\nnot Cold(glory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "June is calcareous. Dulcia is westside. Rodolfo is somnolent. Maia is anagogic. If something is calcareous then it is anagogic. Smart, westside things are calcareous. If something is uneconomic and zoological then it is calcareous. If Maia is uneconomic and Maia is somnolent then Maia is anagogic. All anagogic things are uneconomic. All uneconomic, calcareous things are somnolent. Rodolfo is zoological.", "logic": "\nCalcareous(june)\nWestside(dulcia)\nSomnolent(rodolfo)\nAnagogic(maia)\nforall x (Calcareous(x) -> Anagogic(x))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Westside(x) -> Calcareous(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) and Zoological(x) -> Calcareous(x))\nUneconomic(maia) and Somnolent(maia) -> Anagogic(maia)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) and Calcareous(x) -> Somnolent(x))\n\nZoological(rodolfo)\n\nZoological(rodolfo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Graig is secretory. Graig is sonic. Graig is leavened. Reynard is sonic. Reynard is leavened. Reynard is telepathic. Reynard is upstair. Deanna is upstair. Jermaine is telepathic. Jermaine is sworn. If Deanna is sonic and Deanna is upstair then Deanna is leavened. Blue, telepathic things are secretory. If something is sworn then it is upstair. White things are sworn. All telepathic, secretory things are upstair. Smart, sonic things are telepathic. White, secretory things are sworn. All sworn, leavened things are tousled. Reynard is leavened.", "logic": "\nSecretory(graig)\nSonic(graig)\nLeavened(graig)\nSonic(reynard)\nLeavened(reynard)\nTelepathic(reynard)\nUpstair(reynard)\nUpstair(deanna)\nTelepathic(jermaine)\nSworn(jermaine)\nSonic(deanna) and Upstair(deanna) -> Leavened(deanna)\nforall x (Tousled(x) and Telepathic(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Sworn(x) -> Upstair(x))\nforall x (Upstair(x) -> Sworn(x))\nforall x (Telepathic(x) and Secretory(x) -> Upstair(x))\nforall x (Sworn(x) and Sonic(x) -> Telepathic(x))\nforall x (Upstair(x) and Secretory(x) -> Sworn(x))\nforall x (Sworn(x) and Leavened(x) -> Tousled(x))\n\nLeavened(reynard)\n\ntherefore Leavened(reynard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Kaitlin is particular. Kaitlin is solitary. Kaitlin is achromous. Reggy is solitary. Reggy is achromous. Reggy is fictile. Reggy is tsaristic. Fulvia is tsaristic. Valry is fictile. Valry is ignited. If Fulvia is solitary and Fulvia is tsaristic then Fulvia is achromous. Blue, fictile things are particular. If something is ignited then it is tsaristic. White things are ignited. All fictile, particular things are tsaristic. Smart, solitary things are fictile. White, particular things are ignited. All ignited, achromous things are baculiform. Reggy is not fictile.", "logic": "\nParticular(kaitlin)\nSolitary(kaitlin)\nAchromous(kaitlin)\nSolitary(reggy)\nAchromous(reggy)\nFictile(reggy)\nTsaristic(reggy)\nTsaristic(fulvia)\nFictile(valry)\nIgnited(valry)\nSolitary(fulvia) and Tsaristic(fulvia) -> Achromous(fulvia)\nforall x (Baculiform(x) and Fictile(x) -> Particular(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) -> Tsaristic(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) and Particular(x) -> Tsaristic(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) and Solitary(x) -> Fictile(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and Particular(x) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) and Achromous(x) -> Baculiform(x))\n\nnot Fictile(reggy)\n\ntherefore Fictile(reggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Hassan is unknowable. Hassan is agrypnotic. Hassan is stimulated. Karissa is agrypnotic. Karissa is stimulated. Karissa is parttime. Karissa is lanky. Beowulf is lanky. Shellie is parttime. Shellie is wheelless. If Beowulf is agrypnotic and Beowulf is lanky then Beowulf is stimulated. Blue, parttime things are unknowable. If something is wheelless then it is lanky. White things are wheelless. All parttime, unknowable things are lanky. Smart, agrypnotic things are parttime. White, unknowable things are wheelless. All wheelless, stimulated things are frothing. Beowulf is wheelless.", "logic": "\nUnknowable(hassan)\nAgrypnotic(hassan)\nStimulated(hassan)\nAgrypnotic(karissa)\nStimulated(karissa)\nParttime(karissa)\nLanky(karissa)\nLanky(beowulf)\nParttime(shellie)\nWheelless(shellie)\nAgrypnotic(beowulf) and Lanky(beowulf) -> Stimulated(beowulf)\nforall x (Frothing(x) and Parttime(x) -> Unknowable(x))\nforall x (Wheelless(x) -> Lanky(x))\nforall x (Lanky(x) -> Wheelless(x))\nforall x (Parttime(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Lanky(x))\nforall x (Wheelless(x) and Agrypnotic(x) -> Parttime(x))\nforall x (Lanky(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Wheelless(x))\nforall x (Wheelless(x) and Stimulated(x) -> Frothing(x))\n\nWheelless(beowulf)\n\nLanky(beowulf) and forall x (Lanky(x) -> Wheelless(x)) -> therefore Wheelless(beowulf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Calypso is poorly. Calypso is fugacious. Calypso is rectal. Judy is fugacious. Judy is rectal. Judy is rheologic. Judy is dyspnoeic. Bartolemo is dyspnoeic. Osbourne is rheologic. Osbourne is preventive. If Bartolemo is fugacious and Bartolemo is dyspnoeic then Bartolemo is rectal. Blue, rheologic things are poorly. If something is preventive then it is dyspnoeic. White things are preventive. All rheologic, poorly things are dyspnoeic. Smart, fugacious things are rheologic. White, poorly things are preventive. All preventive, rectal things are throbbing. Judy is not preventive.", "logic": "\nPoorly(calypso)\nFugacious(calypso)\nRectal(calypso)\nFugacious(judy)\nRectal(judy)\nRheologic(judy)\nDyspnoeic(judy)\nDyspnoeic(bartolemo)\nRheologic(osbourne)\nPreventive(osbourne)\nFugacious(bartolemo) and Dyspnoeic(bartolemo) -> Rectal(bartolemo)\nforall x (Throbbing(x) and Rheologic(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> Preventive(x))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Poorly(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) and Fugacious(x) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and Poorly(x) -> Preventive(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) and Rectal(x) -> Throbbing(x))\n\nnot Preventive(judy)\n\nDyspnoeic(judy) and forall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> Preventive(x)) -> therefore Preventive(judy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Jeanelle is featured. Jeanelle is anthropoid. Jeanelle is paperback. Savina is anthropoid. Savina is paperback. Savina is toothlike. Savina is unsanded. Ema is unsanded. Fulton is toothlike. Fulton is ectodermal. If Ema is anthropoid and Ema is unsanded then Ema is paperback. Blue, toothlike things are featured. If something is ectodermal then it is unsanded. White things are ectodermal. All toothlike, featured things are unsanded. Smart, anthropoid things are toothlike. White, featured things are ectodermal. All ectodermal, paperback things are offensive. Savina is offensive.", "logic": "\nFeatured(jeanelle)\nAnthropoid(jeanelle)\nPaperback(jeanelle)\nAnthropoid(savina)\nPaperback(savina)\nToothlike(savina)\nUnsanded(savina)\nUnsanded(ema)\nToothlike(fulton)\nEctodermal(fulton)\nAnthropoid(ema) and Unsanded(ema) -> Paperback(ema)\nforall x (Offensive(x) and Toothlike(x) -> Featured(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) -> Unsanded(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) and Featured(x) -> Unsanded(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Anthropoid(x) -> Toothlike(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) and Featured(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Paperback(x) -> Offensive(x))\n\nOffensive(savina)\n\nUnsanded(savina) and forall x (Unsanded(x) -> Ectodermal(x)) -> therefore Ectodermal(savina) Ectodermal(savina) and Paperback(savina) and forall x (Ectodermal(x) and Paperback(x) -> Offensive(x)) -> therefore Offensive(savina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Meyer is hebraic. Meyer is misbegot. Meyer is ruminant. Lorrin is misbegot. Lorrin is ruminant. Lorrin is amphibian. Lorrin is capitular. Normand is capitular. Iolande is amphibian. Iolande is pitiful. If Normand is misbegot and Normand is capitular then Normand is ruminant. Blue, amphibian things are hebraic. If something is pitiful then it is capitular. White things are pitiful. All amphibian, hebraic things are capitular. Smart, misbegot things are amphibian. White, hebraic things are pitiful. All pitiful, ruminant things are cervical. Lorrin is not cervical.", "logic": "\nHebraic(meyer)\nMisbegot(meyer)\nRuminant(meyer)\nMisbegot(lorrin)\nRuminant(lorrin)\nAmphibian(lorrin)\nCapitular(lorrin)\nCapitular(normand)\nAmphibian(iolande)\nPitiful(iolande)\nMisbegot(normand) and Capitular(normand) -> Ruminant(normand)\nforall x (Cervical(x) and Amphibian(x) -> Hebraic(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> Capitular(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> Pitiful(x))\nforall x (Amphibian(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Capitular(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) and Misbegot(x) -> Amphibian(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Pitiful(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) and Ruminant(x) -> Cervical(x))\n\nnot Cervical(lorrin)\n\nCapitular(lorrin) and forall x (Capitular(x) -> Pitiful(x)) -> therefore Pitiful(lorrin) Pitiful(lorrin) and Ruminant(lorrin) and forall x (Pitiful(x) and Ruminant(x) -> Cervical(x)) -> therefore Cervical(lorrin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Godfree is handwoven. Godfree is phallic. Godfree is likeable. Penelopa is phallic. Penelopa is likeable. Penelopa is gooselike. Penelopa is unversed. Nonnah is unversed. Tamiko is gooselike. Tamiko is semestrial. If Nonnah is phallic and Nonnah is unversed then Nonnah is likeable. Blue, gooselike things are handwoven. If something is semestrial then it is unversed. White things are semestrial. All gooselike, handwoven things are unversed. Smart, phallic things are gooselike. White, handwoven things are semestrial. All semestrial, likeable things are crank. Penelopa is handwoven.", "logic": "\nHandwoven(godfree)\nPhallic(godfree)\nLikeable(godfree)\nPhallic(penelopa)\nLikeable(penelopa)\nGooselike(penelopa)\nUnversed(penelopa)\nUnversed(nonnah)\nGooselike(tamiko)\nSemestrial(tamiko)\nPhallic(nonnah) and Unversed(nonnah) -> Likeable(nonnah)\nforall x (Crank(x) and Gooselike(x) -> Handwoven(x))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) -> Unversed(x))\nforall x (Unversed(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Gooselike(x) and Handwoven(x) -> Unversed(x))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) and Phallic(x) -> Gooselike(x))\nforall x (Unversed(x) and Handwoven(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) and Likeable(x) -> Crank(x))\n\nHandwoven(penelopa)\n\nUnversed(penelopa) and forall x (Unversed(x) -> Semestrial(x)) -> therefore Semestrial(penelopa) Semestrial(penelopa) and Likeable(penelopa) and forall x (Semestrial(x) and Likeable(x) -> Crank(x)) -> therefore Crank(penelopa) Crank(penelopa) and Gooselike(penelopa) and forall x (Crank(x) and Gooselike(x) -> Handwoven(x)) -> therefore Handwoven(penelopa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Dickie is enhanced. Dickie is overriding. Dickie is indefinite. Winifield is overriding. Winifield is indefinite. Winifield is jobless. Winifield is unnerved. Sylvan is unnerved. Claribel is jobless. Claribel is forbidden. If Sylvan is overriding and Sylvan is unnerved then Sylvan is indefinite. Blue, jobless things are enhanced. If something is forbidden then it is unnerved. White things are forbidden. All jobless, enhanced things are unnerved. Smart, overriding things are jobless. White, enhanced things are forbidden. All forbidden, indefinite things are cosmogonic. Winifield is not enhanced.", "logic": "\nEnhanced(dickie)\nOverriding(dickie)\nIndefinite(dickie)\nOverriding(winifield)\nIndefinite(winifield)\nJobless(winifield)\nUnnerved(winifield)\nUnnerved(sylvan)\nJobless(claribel)\nForbidden(claribel)\nOverriding(sylvan) and Unnerved(sylvan) -> Indefinite(sylvan)\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) and Jobless(x) -> Enhanced(x))\nforall x (Forbidden(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Unnerved(x) -> Forbidden(x))\nforall x (Jobless(x) and Enhanced(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Forbidden(x) and Overriding(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Unnerved(x) and Enhanced(x) -> Forbidden(x))\nforall x (Forbidden(x) and Indefinite(x) -> Cosmogonic(x))\n\nnot Enhanced(winifield)\n\nUnnerved(winifield) and forall x (Unnerved(x) -> Forbidden(x)) -> therefore Forbidden(winifield) Forbidden(winifield) and Indefinite(winifield) and forall x (Forbidden(x) and Indefinite(x) -> Cosmogonic(x)) -> therefore Cosmogonic(winifield) Cosmogonic(winifield) and Jobless(winifield) and forall x (Cosmogonic(x) and Jobless(x) -> Enhanced(x)) -> therefore Enhanced(winifield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Josephine is unworkable. Josephine is sapless. Josephine is legion. Mariele is sapless. Mariele is legion. Mariele is rushy. Mariele is familial. Tulley is familial. Gavriel is rushy. Gavriel is setose. If Tulley is sapless and Tulley is familial then Tulley is legion. Blue, rushy things are unworkable. If something is setose then it is familial. White things are setose. All rushy, unworkable things are familial. Smart, sapless things are rushy. White, unworkable things are setose. All setose, legion things are volcanic. Tulley is not legion.", "logic": "\nUnworkable(josephine)\nSapless(josephine)\nLegion(josephine)\nSapless(mariele)\nLegion(mariele)\nRushy(mariele)\nFamilial(mariele)\nFamilial(tulley)\nRushy(gavriel)\nSetose(gavriel)\nSapless(tulley) and Familial(tulley) -> Legion(tulley)\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Rushy(x) -> Unworkable(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Familial(x))\nforall x (Familial(x) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Rushy(x) and Unworkable(x) -> Familial(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) and Sapless(x) -> Rushy(x))\nforall x (Familial(x) and Unworkable(x) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) and Legion(x) -> Volcanic(x))\n\nnot Legion(tulley)\n\nSapless(tulley) and Familial(tulley) -> Legion(tulley) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Gerrard is ossiculate. Gerrard is tudor. Gerrard is kuwaiti. Roberta is tudor. Roberta is kuwaiti. Roberta is unamended. Roberta is clubbable. Lenore is clubbable. Renate is unamended. Renate is antemortem. If Lenore is tudor and Lenore is clubbable then Lenore is kuwaiti. Blue, unamended things are ossiculate. If something is antemortem then it is clubbable. White things are antemortem. All unamended, ossiculate things are clubbable. Smart, tudor things are unamended. White, ossiculate things are antemortem. All antemortem, kuwaiti things are semihard. Lenore is unamended.", "logic": "\nOssiculate(gerrard)\nTudor(gerrard)\nKuwaiti(gerrard)\nTudor(roberta)\nKuwaiti(roberta)\nUnamended(roberta)\nClubbable(roberta)\nClubbable(lenore)\nUnamended(renate)\nAntemortem(renate)\nTudor(lenore) and Clubbable(lenore) -> Kuwaiti(lenore)\nforall x (Semihard(x) and Unamended(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Clubbable(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Unamended(x) and Ossiculate(x) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) and Tudor(x) -> Unamended(x))\nforall x (Clubbable(x) and Ossiculate(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) and Kuwaiti(x) -> Semihard(x))\n\nUnamended(lenore)\n\nforall x (Antemortem(x) and Tudor(x) -> Unamended(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Phelia is antiguan. Phelia is shrieked. Phelia is diarrheic. Lindsey is shrieked. Lindsey is diarrheic. Lindsey is perfoliate. Lindsey is furnished. Redmond is furnished. Carmella is perfoliate. Carmella is scalene. If Redmond is shrieked and Redmond is furnished then Redmond is diarrheic. Blue, perfoliate things are antiguan. If something is scalene then it is furnished. White things are scalene. All perfoliate, antiguan things are furnished. Smart, shrieked things are perfoliate. White, antiguan things are scalene. All scalene, diarrheic things are pyogenic. Phelia is not perfoliate.", "logic": "\nAntiguan(phelia)\nShrieked(phelia)\nDiarrheic(phelia)\nShrieked(lindsey)\nDiarrheic(lindsey)\nPerfoliate(lindsey)\nFurnished(lindsey)\nFurnished(redmond)\nPerfoliate(carmella)\nScalene(carmella)\nShrieked(redmond) and Furnished(redmond) -> Diarrheic(redmond)\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and Perfoliate(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Furnished(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Perfoliate(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Furnished(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) and Shrieked(x) -> Perfoliate(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) and Diarrheic(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\n\nnot Perfoliate(phelia)\n\nforall x (Scalene(x) and Shrieked(x) -> Perfoliate(x)) <- forall x (Furnished(x) -> Scalene(x)) <- forall x (Scalene(x) -> Furnished(x)) <- forall x (Furnished(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Scalene(x)) <- forall x (Perfoliate(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Furnished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Lanie is inhumane. Lanie is acute. Lanie is unoriented. Paolo is acute. Paolo is unoriented. Paolo is arrant. Paolo is mealy. Zulema is mealy. Sim is arrant. Sim is omani. If Zulema is acute and Zulema is mealy then Zulema is unoriented. Blue, arrant things are inhumane. If something is omani then it is mealy. White things are omani. All arrant, inhumane things are mealy. Smart, acute things are arrant. White, inhumane things are omani. All omani, unoriented things are undutiful. Sim is inhumane.", "logic": "\nInhumane(lanie)\nAcute(lanie)\nUnoriented(lanie)\nAcute(paolo)\nUnoriented(paolo)\nArrant(paolo)\nMealy(paolo)\nMealy(zulema)\nArrant(sim)\nOmani(sim)\nAcute(zulema) and Mealy(zulema) -> Unoriented(zulema)\nforall x (Undutiful(x) and Arrant(x) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> Omani(x))\nforall x (Arrant(x) and Inhumane(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) and Acute(x) -> Arrant(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) and Inhumane(x) -> Omani(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) and Unoriented(x) -> Undutiful(x))\n\nInhumane(sim)\n\nforall x (Undutiful(x) and Arrant(x) -> Inhumane(x)) <- forall x (Omani(x) and Unoriented(x) -> Undutiful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Celestine is dishonored. Celestine is soulful. Celestine is noble. Dolli is soulful. Dolli is noble. Dolli is eponymous. Dolli is disposed. Denyse is disposed. Mahmud is eponymous. Mahmud is sole. If Denyse is soulful and Denyse is disposed then Denyse is noble. Blue, eponymous things are dishonored. If something is sole then it is disposed. White things are sole. All eponymous, dishonored things are disposed. Smart, soulful things are eponymous. White, dishonored things are sole. All sole, noble things are fortieth. Mahmud is not noble.", "logic": "\nDishonored(celestine)\nSoulful(celestine)\nNoble(celestine)\nSoulful(dolli)\nNoble(dolli)\nEponymous(dolli)\nDisposed(dolli)\nDisposed(denyse)\nEponymous(mahmud)\nSole(mahmud)\nSoulful(denyse) and Disposed(denyse) -> Noble(denyse)\nforall x (Fortieth(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Sole(x) -> Disposed(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> Sole(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) and Dishonored(x) -> Disposed(x))\nforall x (Sole(x) and Soulful(x) -> Eponymous(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Dishonored(x) -> Sole(x))\nforall x (Sole(x) and Noble(x) -> Fortieth(x))\n\nnot Noble(mahmud)\n\nnot Noble(mahmud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Matthaeus is brassbound. Matthaeus is kinglike. Matthaeus is glamorous. Alix is kinglike. Alix is glamorous. Alix is chiliastic. Alix is epicene. Lynda is epicene. Mufi is chiliastic. Mufi is stitched. If Lynda is kinglike and Lynda is epicene then Lynda is glamorous. Blue, chiliastic things are brassbound. If something is stitched then it is epicene. White things are stitched. All chiliastic, brassbound things are epicene. Smart, kinglike things are chiliastic. White, brassbound things are stitched. All stitched, glamorous things are rightmost. Lynda is kinglike.", "logic": "\nBrassbound(matthaeus)\nKinglike(matthaeus)\nGlamorous(matthaeus)\nKinglike(alix)\nGlamorous(alix)\nChiliastic(alix)\nEpicene(alix)\nEpicene(lynda)\nChiliastic(mufi)\nStitched(mufi)\nKinglike(lynda) and Epicene(lynda) -> Glamorous(lynda)\nforall x (Rightmost(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Brassbound(x))\nforall x (Stitched(x) -> Epicene(x))\nforall x (Epicene(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) and Brassbound(x) -> Epicene(x))\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Kinglike(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\nforall x (Epicene(x) and Brassbound(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Glamorous(x) -> Rightmost(x))\n\nKinglike(lynda)\n\nKinglike(lynda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Alberta is blithesome. Alberta is not unclothed. Alberta is bombastic. Alberta is ironed. Hilliary is ironed. Rodd is unclothed. Rodd is panoplied. Rodd is not bombastic. Rodd is noncaloric. Rodd is striate. Quiet people are not blithesome. All blithesome, ironed people are bombastic. If Hilliary is striate and Hilliary is noncaloric then Hilliary is blithesome. If Hilliary is ironed then Hilliary is blithesome. Quiet, ironed people are panoplied. If someone is bombastic and not noncaloric then they are not striate. All bombastic, ironed people are not unclothed. If someone is striate and not blithesome then they are unclothed. Alberta is blithesome.", "logic": "\nBlithesome(alberta)\nnot Unclothed(alberta)\nBombastic(alberta)\nIroned(alberta)\nIroned(hilliary)\nUnclothed(rodd)\nPanoplied(rodd)\nnot Bombastic(rodd)\nNoncaloric(rodd)\nStriate(rodd)\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> not Blithesome(x))\nforall x (Blithesome(x) and Ironed(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nStriate(hilliary) and Noncaloric(hilliary) -> Blithesome(hilliary)\nIroned(hilliary) -> Blithesome(hilliary)\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) and Ironed(x) -> Panoplied(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and not Noncaloric(x) -> not Striate(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and Ironed(x) -> not Unclothed(x))\nforall x (Striate(x) and not Blithesome(x) -> Unclothed(x))\n\nBlithesome(alberta)\n\ntherefore Blithesome(alberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Laryssa is veiled. Laryssa is not cruel. Laryssa is insurgent. Laryssa is cecal. Bette is cecal. Ruthe is cruel. Ruthe is littoral. Ruthe is not insurgent. Ruthe is aerophilic. Ruthe is inviolate. Quiet people are not veiled. All veiled, cecal people are insurgent. If Bette is inviolate and Bette is aerophilic then Bette is veiled. If Bette is cecal then Bette is veiled. Quiet, cecal people are littoral. If someone is insurgent and not aerophilic then they are not inviolate. All insurgent, cecal people are not cruel. If someone is inviolate and not veiled then they are cruel. Laryssa is cruel.", "logic": "\nVeiled(laryssa)\nnot Cruel(laryssa)\nInsurgent(laryssa)\nCecal(laryssa)\nCecal(bette)\nCruel(ruthe)\nLittoral(ruthe)\nnot Insurgent(ruthe)\nAerophilic(ruthe)\nInviolate(ruthe)\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> not Veiled(x))\nforall x (Veiled(x) and Cecal(x) -> Insurgent(x))\nInviolate(bette) and Aerophilic(bette) -> Veiled(bette)\nCecal(bette) -> Veiled(bette)\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) and Cecal(x) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Insurgent(x) and not Aerophilic(x) -> not Inviolate(x))\nforall x (Insurgent(x) and Cecal(x) -> not Cruel(x))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) and not Veiled(x) -> Cruel(x))\n\nCruel(laryssa)\n\ntherefore not Cruel(laryssa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Worth is honest. Worth is not symbolic. Worth is cushy. Worth is moot. Aron is moot. Solange is symbolic. Solange is undrained. Solange is not cushy. Solange is brilliant. Solange is aboulic. Quiet people are not honest. All honest, moot people are cushy. If Aron is aboulic and Aron is brilliant then Aron is honest. If Aron is moot then Aron is honest. Quiet, moot people are undrained. If someone is cushy and not brilliant then they are not aboulic. All cushy, moot people are not symbolic. If someone is aboulic and not honest then they are symbolic. Solange is not honest.", "logic": "\nHonest(worth)\nnot Symbolic(worth)\nCushy(worth)\nMoot(worth)\nMoot(aron)\nSymbolic(solange)\nUndrained(solange)\nnot Cushy(solange)\nBrilliant(solange)\nAboulic(solange)\nforall x (Brilliant(x) -> not Honest(x))\nforall x (Honest(x) and Moot(x) -> Cushy(x))\nAboulic(aron) and Brilliant(aron) -> Honest(aron)\nMoot(aron) -> Honest(aron)\nforall x (Brilliant(x) and Moot(x) -> Undrained(x))\nforall x (Cushy(x) and not Brilliant(x) -> not Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Cushy(x) and Moot(x) -> not Symbolic(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) and not Honest(x) -> Symbolic(x))\n\nnot Honest(solange)\n\nBrilliant(solange) and forall x (Brilliant(x) -> not Honest(x)) -> therefore not Honest(solange)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Marius is chanted. Marius is not monoecious. Marius is fizzy. Marius is plumping. Chloe is plumping. Eli is monoecious. Eli is ateleiotic. Eli is not fizzy. Eli is threadlike. Eli is undesigned. Quiet people are not chanted. All chanted, plumping people are fizzy. If Chloe is undesigned and Chloe is threadlike then Chloe is chanted. If Chloe is plumping then Chloe is chanted. Quiet, plumping people are ateleiotic. If someone is fizzy and not threadlike then they are not undesigned. All fizzy, plumping people are not monoecious. If someone is undesigned and not chanted then they are monoecious. Chloe is not chanted.", "logic": "\nChanted(marius)\nnot Monoecious(marius)\nFizzy(marius)\nPlumping(marius)\nPlumping(chloe)\nMonoecious(eli)\nAteleiotic(eli)\nnot Fizzy(eli)\nThreadlike(eli)\nUndesigned(eli)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) -> not Chanted(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) and Plumping(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nUndesigned(chloe) and Threadlike(chloe) -> Chanted(chloe)\nPlumping(chloe) -> Chanted(chloe)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and Plumping(x) -> Ateleiotic(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) and not Threadlike(x) -> not Undesigned(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) and Plumping(x) -> not Monoecious(x))\nforall x (Undesigned(x) and not Chanted(x) -> Monoecious(x))\n\nnot Chanted(chloe)\n\nPlumping(chloe) and Plumping(chloe) -> Chanted(chloe) -> therefore Chanted(chloe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Tabina is spacey. Tabina is not counter. Tabina is fastigiate. Tabina is sarcosomal. Clarice is sarcosomal. Harvard is counter. Harvard is deductible. Harvard is not fastigiate. Harvard is rascally. Harvard is debonnaire. Quiet people are not spacey. All spacey, sarcosomal people are fastigiate. If Clarice is debonnaire and Clarice is rascally then Clarice is spacey. If Clarice is sarcosomal then Clarice is spacey. Quiet, sarcosomal people are deductible. If someone is fastigiate and not rascally then they are not debonnaire. All fastigiate, sarcosomal people are not counter. If someone is debonnaire and not spacey then they are counter. Clarice is fastigiate.", "logic": "\nSpacey(tabina)\nnot Counter(tabina)\nFastigiate(tabina)\nSarcosomal(tabina)\nSarcosomal(clarice)\nCounter(harvard)\nDeductible(harvard)\nnot Fastigiate(harvard)\nRascally(harvard)\nDebonnaire(harvard)\nforall x (Rascally(x) -> not Spacey(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) and Sarcosomal(x) -> Fastigiate(x))\nDebonnaire(clarice) and Rascally(clarice) -> Spacey(clarice)\nSarcosomal(clarice) -> Spacey(clarice)\nforall x (Rascally(x) and Sarcosomal(x) -> Deductible(x))\nforall x (Fastigiate(x) and not Rascally(x) -> not Debonnaire(x))\nforall x (Fastigiate(x) and Sarcosomal(x) -> not Counter(x))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and not Spacey(x) -> Counter(x))\n\nFastigiate(clarice)\n\nSarcosomal(clarice) and Sarcosomal(clarice) -> Spacey(clarice) -> therefore Spacey(clarice) Spacey(clarice) and Sarcosomal(clarice) and forall x (Spacey(x) and Sarcosomal(x) -> Fastigiate(x)) -> therefore Fastigiate(clarice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Lyndsay is postmortal. Lyndsay is not woodsy. Lyndsay is furthest. Lyndsay is nazi. Tildi is nazi. Aeriel is woodsy. Aeriel is loco. Aeriel is not furthest. Aeriel is marsupial. Aeriel is disfigured. Quiet people are not postmortal. All postmortal, nazi people are furthest. If Tildi is disfigured and Tildi is marsupial then Tildi is postmortal. If Tildi is nazi then Tildi is postmortal. Quiet, nazi people are loco. If someone is furthest and not marsupial then they are not disfigured. All furthest, nazi people are not woodsy. If someone is disfigured and not postmortal then they are woodsy. Tildi is not furthest.", "logic": "\nPostmortal(lyndsay)\nnot Woodsy(lyndsay)\nFurthest(lyndsay)\nNazi(lyndsay)\nNazi(tildi)\nWoodsy(aeriel)\nLoco(aeriel)\nnot Furthest(aeriel)\nMarsupial(aeriel)\nDisfigured(aeriel)\nforall x (Marsupial(x) -> not Postmortal(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Nazi(x) -> Furthest(x))\nDisfigured(tildi) and Marsupial(tildi) -> Postmortal(tildi)\nNazi(tildi) -> Postmortal(tildi)\nforall x (Marsupial(x) and Nazi(x) -> Loco(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and not Marsupial(x) -> not Disfigured(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and Nazi(x) -> not Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) and not Postmortal(x) -> Woodsy(x))\n\nnot Furthest(tildi)\n\nNazi(tildi) and Nazi(tildi) -> Postmortal(tildi) -> therefore Postmortal(tildi) Postmortal(tildi) and Nazi(tildi) and forall x (Postmortal(x) and Nazi(x) -> Furthest(x)) -> therefore Furthest(tildi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Maia is unvigilant. Maia is not mordant. Maia is maximal. Maia is aspirant. Nicholle is aspirant. Gladys is mordant. Gladys is reassuring. Gladys is not maximal. Gladys is unsnarled. Gladys is scornful. Quiet people are not unvigilant. All unvigilant, aspirant people are maximal. If Nicholle is scornful and Nicholle is unsnarled then Nicholle is unvigilant. If Nicholle is aspirant then Nicholle is unvigilant. Quiet, aspirant people are reassuring. If someone is maximal and not unsnarled then they are not scornful. All maximal, aspirant people are not mordant. If someone is scornful and not unvigilant then they are mordant. Nicholle is not mordant.", "logic": "\nUnvigilant(maia)\nnot Mordant(maia)\nMaximal(maia)\nAspirant(maia)\nAspirant(nicholle)\nMordant(gladys)\nReassuring(gladys)\nnot Maximal(gladys)\nUnsnarled(gladys)\nScornful(gladys)\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) -> not Unvigilant(x))\nforall x (Unvigilant(x) and Aspirant(x) -> Maximal(x))\nScornful(nicholle) and Unsnarled(nicholle) -> Unvigilant(nicholle)\nAspirant(nicholle) -> Unvigilant(nicholle)\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) and Aspirant(x) -> Reassuring(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) and not Unsnarled(x) -> not Scornful(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) and Aspirant(x) -> not Mordant(x))\nforall x (Scornful(x) and not Unvigilant(x) -> Mordant(x))\n\nnot Mordant(nicholle)\n\nAspirant(nicholle) and Aspirant(nicholle) -> Unvigilant(nicholle) -> therefore Unvigilant(nicholle) Unvigilant(nicholle) and Aspirant(nicholle) and forall x (Unvigilant(x) and Aspirant(x) -> Maximal(x)) -> therefore Maximal(nicholle) Maximal(nicholle) and Aspirant(nicholle) and forall x (Maximal(x) and Aspirant(x) -> not Mordant(x)) -> therefore not Mordant(nicholle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Hamil is dendroid. Hamil is not uncreative. Hamil is vixenish. Hamil is billion. Jemmy is billion. Matthias is uncreative. Matthias is inbuilt. Matthias is not vixenish. Matthias is rubberlike. Matthias is tuscan. Quiet people are not dendroid. All dendroid, billion people are vixenish. If Jemmy is tuscan and Jemmy is rubberlike then Jemmy is dendroid. If Jemmy is billion then Jemmy is dendroid. Quiet, billion people are inbuilt. If someone is vixenish and not rubberlike then they are not tuscan. All vixenish, billion people are not uncreative. If someone is tuscan and not dendroid then they are uncreative. Jemmy is uncreative.", "logic": "\nDendroid(hamil)\nnot Uncreative(hamil)\nVixenish(hamil)\nBillion(hamil)\nBillion(jemmy)\nUncreative(matthias)\nInbuilt(matthias)\nnot Vixenish(matthias)\nRubberlike(matthias)\nTuscan(matthias)\nforall x (Rubberlike(x) -> not Dendroid(x))\nforall x (Dendroid(x) and Billion(x) -> Vixenish(x))\nTuscan(jemmy) and Rubberlike(jemmy) -> Dendroid(jemmy)\nBillion(jemmy) -> Dendroid(jemmy)\nforall x (Rubberlike(x) and Billion(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) and not Rubberlike(x) -> not Tuscan(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) and Billion(x) -> not Uncreative(x))\nforall x (Tuscan(x) and not Dendroid(x) -> Uncreative(x))\n\nUncreative(jemmy)\n\nBillion(jemmy) and Billion(jemmy) -> Dendroid(jemmy) -> therefore Dendroid(jemmy) Dendroid(jemmy) and Billion(jemmy) and forall x (Dendroid(x) and Billion(x) -> Vixenish(x)) -> therefore Vixenish(jemmy) Vixenish(jemmy) and Billion(jemmy) and forall x (Vixenish(x) and Billion(x) -> not Uncreative(x)) -> therefore not Uncreative(jemmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Uta is gandhian. Uta is not supposable. Uta is maroc. Uta is lilac. Darline is lilac. Olag is supposable. Olag is lengthened. Olag is not maroc. Olag is fallacious. Olag is some. Quiet people are not gandhian. All gandhian, lilac people are maroc. If Darline is some and Darline is fallacious then Darline is gandhian. If Darline is lilac then Darline is gandhian. Quiet, lilac people are lengthened. If someone is maroc and not fallacious then they are not some. All maroc, lilac people are not supposable. If someone is some and not gandhian then they are supposable. Uta is not lengthened.", "logic": "\nGandhian(uta)\nnot Supposable(uta)\nMaroc(uta)\nLilac(uta)\nLilac(darline)\nSupposable(olag)\nLengthened(olag)\nnot Maroc(olag)\nFallacious(olag)\nSome(olag)\nforall x (Fallacious(x) -> not Gandhian(x))\nforall x (Gandhian(x) and Lilac(x) -> Maroc(x))\nSome(darline) and Fallacious(darline) -> Gandhian(darline)\nLilac(darline) -> Gandhian(darline)\nforall x (Fallacious(x) and Lilac(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nforall x (Maroc(x) and not Fallacious(x) -> not Some(x))\nforall x (Maroc(x) and Lilac(x) -> not Supposable(x))\nforall x (Some(x) and not Gandhian(x) -> Supposable(x))\n\nnot Lengthened(uta)\n\nforall x (Fallacious(x) and Lilac(x) -> Lengthened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Jeralee is gothic. Jeralee is not varying. Jeralee is explicable. Jeralee is saprozoic. Trudey is saprozoic. Illa is varying. Illa is emaciated. Illa is not explicable. Illa is lxxiii. Illa is bridgeable. Quiet people are not gothic. All gothic, saprozoic people are explicable. If Trudey is bridgeable and Trudey is lxxiii then Trudey is gothic. If Trudey is saprozoic then Trudey is gothic. Quiet, saprozoic people are emaciated. If someone is explicable and not lxxiii then they are not bridgeable. All explicable, saprozoic people are not varying. If someone is bridgeable and not gothic then they are varying. Trudey is emaciated.", "logic": "\nGothic(jeralee)\nnot Varying(jeralee)\nExplicable(jeralee)\nSaprozoic(jeralee)\nSaprozoic(trudey)\nVarying(illa)\nEmaciated(illa)\nnot Explicable(illa)\nLxxiii(illa)\nBridgeable(illa)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> not Gothic(x))\nforall x (Gothic(x) and Saprozoic(x) -> Explicable(x))\nBridgeable(trudey) and Lxxiii(trudey) -> Gothic(trudey)\nSaprozoic(trudey) -> Gothic(trudey)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and Saprozoic(x) -> Emaciated(x))\nforall x (Explicable(x) and not Lxxiii(x) -> not Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Explicable(x) and Saprozoic(x) -> not Varying(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and not Gothic(x) -> Varying(x))\n\nEmaciated(trudey)\n\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and Saprozoic(x) -> Emaciated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Caro is thermionic. Caro is not agitated. Caro is ruly. Caro is humoral. Randy is humoral. Margit is agitated. Margit is saving. Margit is not ruly. Margit is yokelish. Margit is tarry. Quiet people are not thermionic. All thermionic, humoral people are ruly. If Randy is tarry and Randy is yokelish then Randy is thermionic. If Randy is humoral then Randy is thermionic. Quiet, humoral people are saving. If someone is ruly and not yokelish then they are not tarry. All ruly, humoral people are not agitated. If someone is tarry and not thermionic then they are agitated. Randy is not tarry.", "logic": "\nThermionic(caro)\nnot Agitated(caro)\nRuly(caro)\nHumoral(caro)\nHumoral(randy)\nAgitated(margit)\nSaving(margit)\nnot Ruly(margit)\nYokelish(margit)\nTarry(margit)\nforall x (Yokelish(x) -> not Thermionic(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) and Humoral(x) -> Ruly(x))\nTarry(randy) and Yokelish(randy) -> Thermionic(randy)\nHumoral(randy) -> Thermionic(randy)\nforall x (Yokelish(x) and Humoral(x) -> Saving(x))\nforall x (Ruly(x) and not Yokelish(x) -> not Tarry(x))\nforall x (Ruly(x) and Humoral(x) -> not Agitated(x))\nforall x (Tarry(x) and not Thermionic(x) -> Agitated(x))\n\nnot Tarry(randy)\n\nnot Tarry(randy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Antoni is colour. Antoni is not socialist. Antoni is ischemic. Antoni is fictive. Prunella is fictive. Guinna is socialist. Guinna is acrid. Guinna is not ischemic. Guinna is wiry. Guinna is belted. Quiet people are not colour. All colour, fictive people are ischemic. If Prunella is belted and Prunella is wiry then Prunella is colour. If Prunella is fictive then Prunella is colour. Quiet, fictive people are acrid. If someone is ischemic and not wiry then they are not belted. All ischemic, fictive people are not socialist. If someone is belted and not colour then they are socialist. Antoni is belted.", "logic": "\nColour(antoni)\nnot Socialist(antoni)\nIschemic(antoni)\nFictive(antoni)\nFictive(prunella)\nSocialist(guinna)\nAcrid(guinna)\nnot Ischemic(guinna)\nWiry(guinna)\nBelted(guinna)\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> not Colour(x))\nforall x (Colour(x) and Fictive(x) -> Ischemic(x))\nBelted(prunella) and Wiry(prunella) -> Colour(prunella)\nFictive(prunella) -> Colour(prunella)\nforall x (Wiry(x) and Fictive(x) -> Acrid(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) and not Wiry(x) -> not Belted(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) and Fictive(x) -> not Socialist(x))\nforall x (Belted(x) and not Colour(x) -> Socialist(x))\n\nBelted(antoni)\n\nBelted(antoni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Rosalyn is hydrated. Rosalyn is not spry. Rosalyn is cyclonic. Rosalyn is dear. Ishmael is dear. Vassily is spry. Vassily is neglected. Vassily is not cyclonic. Vassily is peruvian. Vassily is dizygous. Quiet people are not hydrated. All hydrated, dear people are cyclonic. If Ishmael is dizygous and Ishmael is peruvian then Ishmael is hydrated. If Ishmael is dear then Ishmael is hydrated. Quiet, dear people are neglected. If someone is cyclonic and not peruvian then they are not dizygous. All cyclonic, dear people are not spry. If someone is dizygous and not hydrated then they are spry. Rosalyn is not peruvian.", "logic": "\nHydrated(rosalyn)\nnot Spry(rosalyn)\nCyclonic(rosalyn)\nDear(rosalyn)\nDear(ishmael)\nSpry(vassily)\nNeglected(vassily)\nnot Cyclonic(vassily)\nPeruvian(vassily)\nDizygous(vassily)\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> not Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Hydrated(x) and Dear(x) -> Cyclonic(x))\nDizygous(ishmael) and Peruvian(ishmael) -> Hydrated(ishmael)\nDear(ishmael) -> Hydrated(ishmael)\nforall x (Peruvian(x) and Dear(x) -> Neglected(x))\nforall x (Cyclonic(x) and not Peruvian(x) -> not Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Cyclonic(x) and Dear(x) -> not Spry(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) and not Hydrated(x) -> Spry(x))\n\nnot Peruvian(rosalyn)\n\nnot Peruvian(rosalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Lucille is tenebrous. Lucille is not activist. Lucille is laconic. Lucille is prevailing. Jake is prevailing. Devinne is activist. Devinne is touched. Devinne is not laconic. Devinne is protrusive. Devinne is clattery. Quiet people are not tenebrous. All tenebrous, prevailing people are laconic. If Jake is clattery and Jake is protrusive then Jake is tenebrous. If Jake is prevailing then Jake is tenebrous. Quiet, prevailing people are touched. If someone is laconic and not protrusive then they are not clattery. All laconic, prevailing people are not activist. If someone is clattery and not tenebrous then they are activist. Jake is protrusive.", "logic": "\nTenebrous(lucille)\nnot Activist(lucille)\nLaconic(lucille)\nPrevailing(lucille)\nPrevailing(jake)\nActivist(devinne)\nTouched(devinne)\nnot Laconic(devinne)\nProtrusive(devinne)\nClattery(devinne)\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> not Tenebrous(x))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) and Prevailing(x) -> Laconic(x))\nClattery(jake) and Protrusive(jake) -> Tenebrous(jake)\nPrevailing(jake) -> Tenebrous(jake)\nforall x (Protrusive(x) and Prevailing(x) -> Touched(x))\nforall x (Laconic(x) and not Protrusive(x) -> not Clattery(x))\nforall x (Laconic(x) and Prevailing(x) -> not Activist(x))\nforall x (Clattery(x) and not Tenebrous(x) -> Activist(x))\n\nProtrusive(jake)\n\nProtrusive(jake) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Shelley is filarial. Shelley is overjoyed. Shelley is voluntary. Shelley is not skinny. Zora is filarial. Ivor is filarial. Ivor is sapid. Ivor is merged. Ivor is overjoyed. Ivor is not voluntary. Ivor is not skinny. Ivor is assisted. Dinny is filarial. Dinny is sapid. Dinny is merged. Dinny is assisted. All assisted people are merged. Red, filarial people are merged. All merged people are overjoyed. If someone is assisted and not sapid then they are not overjoyed. If Zora is filarial then Zora is assisted. If Zora is overjoyed and Zora is not merged then Zora is not voluntary. If someone is overjoyed and not assisted then they are voluntary. Furry, skinny people are not voluntary. Ivor is merged.", "logic": "\nFilarial(shelley)\nOverjoyed(shelley)\nVoluntary(shelley)\nnot Skinny(shelley)\nFilarial(zora)\nFilarial(ivor)\nSapid(ivor)\nMerged(ivor)\nOverjoyed(ivor)\nnot Voluntary(ivor)\nnot Skinny(ivor)\nAssisted(ivor)\nFilarial(dinny)\nSapid(dinny)\nMerged(dinny)\nAssisted(dinny)\nforall x (Assisted(x) -> Merged(x))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) and Filarial(x) -> Merged(x))\nforall x (Merged(x) -> Overjoyed(x))\nforall x (Assisted(x) and not Sapid(x) -> not Overjoyed(x))\nFilarial(zora) -> Assisted(zora)\nOverjoyed(zora) and not Merged(zora) -> not Voluntary(zora)\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) and not Assisted(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nforall x (Merged(x) and Skinny(x) -> not Voluntary(x))\n\nMerged(ivor)\n\ntherefore Merged(ivor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Dinnie is eyeless. Dinnie is small. Dinnie is horrified. Dinnie is not healthful. Jamie is eyeless. Idell is eyeless. Idell is onomastic. Idell is refutable. Idell is small. Idell is not horrified. Idell is not healthful. Idell is utter. Renel is eyeless. Renel is onomastic. Renel is refutable. Renel is utter. All utter people are refutable. Red, eyeless people are refutable. All refutable people are small. If someone is utter and not onomastic then they are not small. If Jamie is eyeless then Jamie is utter. If Jamie is small and Jamie is not refutable then Jamie is not horrified. If someone is small and not utter then they are horrified. Furry, healthful people are not horrified. Idell is not eyeless.", "logic": "\nEyeless(dinnie)\nSmall(dinnie)\nHorrified(dinnie)\nnot Healthful(dinnie)\nEyeless(jamie)\nEyeless(idell)\nOnomastic(idell)\nRefutable(idell)\nSmall(idell)\nnot Horrified(idell)\nnot Healthful(idell)\nUtter(idell)\nEyeless(renel)\nOnomastic(renel)\nRefutable(renel)\nUtter(renel)\nforall x (Utter(x) -> Refutable(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Eyeless(x) -> Refutable(x))\nforall x (Refutable(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) and not Onomastic(x) -> not Small(x))\nEyeless(jamie) -> Utter(jamie)\nSmall(jamie) and not Refutable(jamie) -> not Horrified(jamie)\nforall x (Small(x) and not Utter(x) -> Horrified(x))\nforall x (Refutable(x) and Healthful(x) -> not Horrified(x))\n\nnot Eyeless(idell)\n\ntherefore Eyeless(idell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Lucine is isthmian. Lucine is mutagenic. Lucine is pharaonic. Lucine is not unbitter. Florella is isthmian. Delbert is isthmian. Delbert is scripted. Delbert is dextral. Delbert is mutagenic. Delbert is not pharaonic. Delbert is not unbitter. Delbert is dual. Cliff is isthmian. Cliff is scripted. Cliff is dextral. Cliff is dual. All dual people are dextral. Red, isthmian people are dextral. All dextral people are mutagenic. If someone is dual and not scripted then they are not mutagenic. If Florella is isthmian then Florella is dual. If Florella is mutagenic and Florella is not dextral then Florella is not pharaonic. If someone is mutagenic and not dual then they are pharaonic. Furry, unbitter people are not pharaonic. Lucine is dextral.", "logic": "\nIsthmian(lucine)\nMutagenic(lucine)\nPharaonic(lucine)\nnot Unbitter(lucine)\nIsthmian(florella)\nIsthmian(delbert)\nScripted(delbert)\nDextral(delbert)\nMutagenic(delbert)\nnot Pharaonic(delbert)\nnot Unbitter(delbert)\nDual(delbert)\nIsthmian(cliff)\nScripted(cliff)\nDextral(cliff)\nDual(cliff)\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Dextral(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and Isthmian(x) -> Dextral(x))\nforall x (Dextral(x) -> Mutagenic(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) and not Scripted(x) -> not Mutagenic(x))\nIsthmian(florella) -> Dual(florella)\nMutagenic(florella) and not Dextral(florella) -> not Pharaonic(florella)\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and not Dual(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Dextral(x) and Unbitter(x) -> not Pharaonic(x))\n\nDextral(lucine)\n\nMutagenic(lucine) and Isthmian(lucine) and forall x (Mutagenic(x) and Isthmian(x) -> Dextral(x)) -> therefore Dextral(lucine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Joachim is sectarian. Joachim is alterative. Joachim is cubital. Joachim is not meaningful. Geraldina is sectarian. Demetris is sectarian. Demetris is brave. Demetris is sudden. Demetris is alterative. Demetris is not cubital. Demetris is not meaningful. Demetris is kenyan. Hamil is sectarian. Hamil is brave. Hamil is sudden. Hamil is kenyan. All kenyan people are sudden. Red, sectarian people are sudden. All sudden people are alterative. If someone is kenyan and not brave then they are not alterative. If Geraldina is sectarian then Geraldina is kenyan. If Geraldina is alterative and Geraldina is not sudden then Geraldina is not cubital. If someone is alterative and not kenyan then they are cubital. Furry, meaningful people are not cubital. Joachim is not sudden.", "logic": "\nSectarian(joachim)\nAlterative(joachim)\nCubital(joachim)\nnot Meaningful(joachim)\nSectarian(geraldina)\nSectarian(demetris)\nBrave(demetris)\nSudden(demetris)\nAlterative(demetris)\nnot Cubital(demetris)\nnot Meaningful(demetris)\nKenyan(demetris)\nSectarian(hamil)\nBrave(hamil)\nSudden(hamil)\nKenyan(hamil)\nforall x (Kenyan(x) -> Sudden(x))\nforall x (Alterative(x) and Sectarian(x) -> Sudden(x))\nforall x (Sudden(x) -> Alterative(x))\nforall x (Kenyan(x) and not Brave(x) -> not Alterative(x))\nSectarian(geraldina) -> Kenyan(geraldina)\nAlterative(geraldina) and not Sudden(geraldina) -> not Cubital(geraldina)\nforall x (Alterative(x) and not Kenyan(x) -> Cubital(x))\nforall x (Sudden(x) and Meaningful(x) -> not Cubital(x))\n\nnot Sudden(joachim)\n\nAlterative(joachim) and Sectarian(joachim) and forall x (Alterative(x) and Sectarian(x) -> Sudden(x)) -> therefore Sudden(joachim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Jolyn is appointed. Jolyn is fiscal. Jolyn is catabatic. Jolyn is not biblical. Sile is appointed. Leia is appointed. Leia is buttonlike. Leia is clamorous. Leia is fiscal. Leia is not catabatic. Leia is not biblical. Leia is diaphanous. Ronny is appointed. Ronny is buttonlike. Ronny is clamorous. Ronny is diaphanous. All diaphanous people are clamorous. Red, appointed people are clamorous. All clamorous people are fiscal. If someone is diaphanous and not buttonlike then they are not fiscal. If Sile is appointed then Sile is diaphanous. If Sile is fiscal and Sile is not clamorous then Sile is not catabatic. If someone is fiscal and not diaphanous then they are catabatic. Furry, biblical people are not catabatic. Sile is clamorous.", "logic": "\nAppointed(jolyn)\nFiscal(jolyn)\nCatabatic(jolyn)\nnot Biblical(jolyn)\nAppointed(sile)\nAppointed(leia)\nButtonlike(leia)\nClamorous(leia)\nFiscal(leia)\nnot Catabatic(leia)\nnot Biblical(leia)\nDiaphanous(leia)\nAppointed(ronny)\nButtonlike(ronny)\nClamorous(ronny)\nDiaphanous(ronny)\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) -> Clamorous(x))\nforall x (Fiscal(x) and Appointed(x) -> Clamorous(x))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) -> Fiscal(x))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) and not Buttonlike(x) -> not Fiscal(x))\nAppointed(sile) -> Diaphanous(sile)\nFiscal(sile) and not Clamorous(sile) -> not Catabatic(sile)\nforall x (Fiscal(x) and not Diaphanous(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) and Biblical(x) -> not Catabatic(x))\n\nClamorous(sile)\n\nAppointed(sile) and Appointed(sile) -> Diaphanous(sile) -> therefore Diaphanous(sile) Diaphanous(sile) and forall x (Diaphanous(x) -> Clamorous(x)) -> therefore Clamorous(sile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Carli is conniving. Carli is pearly. Carli is dangerous. Carli is not unified. Suzi is conniving. Ezechiel is conniving. Ezechiel is sacrosanct. Ezechiel is mawkish. Ezechiel is pearly. Ezechiel is not dangerous. Ezechiel is not unified. Ezechiel is plethoric. Brynn is conniving. Brynn is sacrosanct. Brynn is mawkish. Brynn is plethoric. All plethoric people are mawkish. Red, conniving people are mawkish. All mawkish people are pearly. If someone is plethoric and not sacrosanct then they are not pearly. If Suzi is conniving then Suzi is plethoric. If Suzi is pearly and Suzi is not mawkish then Suzi is not dangerous. If someone is pearly and not plethoric then they are dangerous. Furry, unified people are not dangerous. Suzi is not mawkish.", "logic": "\nConniving(carli)\nPearly(carli)\nDangerous(carli)\nnot Unified(carli)\nConniving(suzi)\nConniving(ezechiel)\nSacrosanct(ezechiel)\nMawkish(ezechiel)\nPearly(ezechiel)\nnot Dangerous(ezechiel)\nnot Unified(ezechiel)\nPlethoric(ezechiel)\nConniving(brynn)\nSacrosanct(brynn)\nMawkish(brynn)\nPlethoric(brynn)\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Pearly(x) and Conniving(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Pearly(x))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) and not Sacrosanct(x) -> not Pearly(x))\nConniving(suzi) -> Plethoric(suzi)\nPearly(suzi) and not Mawkish(suzi) -> not Dangerous(suzi)\nforall x (Pearly(x) and not Plethoric(x) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) and Unified(x) -> not Dangerous(x))\n\nnot Mawkish(suzi)\n\nConniving(suzi) and Conniving(suzi) -> Plethoric(suzi) -> therefore Plethoric(suzi) Plethoric(suzi) and forall x (Plethoric(x) -> Mawkish(x)) -> therefore Mawkish(suzi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Inga is discrete. Inga is ministrant. Inga is untruthful. Inga is not unposed. Karyl is discrete. Ophelia is discrete. Ophelia is plain. Ophelia is adulterate. Ophelia is ministrant. Ophelia is not untruthful. Ophelia is not unposed. Ophelia is guatemalan. Sancho is discrete. Sancho is plain. Sancho is adulterate. Sancho is guatemalan. All guatemalan people are adulterate. Red, discrete people are adulterate. All adulterate people are ministrant. If someone is guatemalan and not plain then they are not ministrant. If Karyl is discrete then Karyl is guatemalan. If Karyl is ministrant and Karyl is not adulterate then Karyl is not untruthful. If someone is ministrant and not guatemalan then they are untruthful. Furry, unposed people are not untruthful. Karyl is ministrant.", "logic": "\nDiscrete(inga)\nMinistrant(inga)\nUntruthful(inga)\nnot Unposed(inga)\nDiscrete(karyl)\nDiscrete(ophelia)\nPlain(ophelia)\nAdulterate(ophelia)\nMinistrant(ophelia)\nnot Untruthful(ophelia)\nnot Unposed(ophelia)\nGuatemalan(ophelia)\nDiscrete(sancho)\nPlain(sancho)\nAdulterate(sancho)\nGuatemalan(sancho)\nforall x (Guatemalan(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nforall x (Ministrant(x) and Discrete(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nforall x (Adulterate(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Guatemalan(x) and not Plain(x) -> not Ministrant(x))\nDiscrete(karyl) -> Guatemalan(karyl)\nMinistrant(karyl) and not Adulterate(karyl) -> not Untruthful(karyl)\nforall x (Ministrant(x) and not Guatemalan(x) -> Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Adulterate(x) and Unposed(x) -> not Untruthful(x))\n\nMinistrant(karyl)\n\nDiscrete(karyl) and Discrete(karyl) -> Guatemalan(karyl) -> therefore Guatemalan(karyl) Guatemalan(karyl) and forall x (Guatemalan(x) -> Adulterate(x)) -> therefore Adulterate(karyl) Adulterate(karyl) and forall x (Adulterate(x) -> Ministrant(x)) -> therefore Ministrant(karyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Modestia is steep. Modestia is plush. Modestia is communal. Modestia is not diocesan. Apollo is steep. Gayla is steep. Gayla is dogging. Gayla is abdominous. Gayla is plush. Gayla is not communal. Gayla is not diocesan. Gayla is windblown. Andree is steep. Andree is dogging. Andree is abdominous. Andree is windblown. All windblown people are abdominous. Red, steep people are abdominous. All abdominous people are plush. If someone is windblown and not dogging then they are not plush. If Apollo is steep then Apollo is windblown. If Apollo is plush and Apollo is not abdominous then Apollo is not communal. If someone is plush and not windblown then they are communal. Furry, diocesan people are not communal. Apollo is not plush.", "logic": "\nSteep(modestia)\nPlush(modestia)\nCommunal(modestia)\nnot Diocesan(modestia)\nSteep(apollo)\nSteep(gayla)\nDogging(gayla)\nAbdominous(gayla)\nPlush(gayla)\nnot Communal(gayla)\nnot Diocesan(gayla)\nWindblown(gayla)\nSteep(andree)\nDogging(andree)\nAbdominous(andree)\nWindblown(andree)\nforall x (Windblown(x) -> Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Plush(x) and Steep(x) -> Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Abdominous(x) -> Plush(x))\nforall x (Windblown(x) and not Dogging(x) -> not Plush(x))\nSteep(apollo) -> Windblown(apollo)\nPlush(apollo) and not Abdominous(apollo) -> not Communal(apollo)\nforall x (Plush(x) and not Windblown(x) -> Communal(x))\nforall x (Abdominous(x) and Diocesan(x) -> not Communal(x))\n\nnot Plush(apollo)\n\nSteep(apollo) and Steep(apollo) -> Windblown(apollo) -> therefore Windblown(apollo) Windblown(apollo) and forall x (Windblown(x) -> Abdominous(x)) -> therefore Abdominous(apollo) Abdominous(apollo) and forall x (Abdominous(x) -> Plush(x)) -> therefore Plush(apollo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Konstanze is maiden. Konstanze is pyrolignic. Konstanze is laryngeal. Konstanze is not extramural. Judye is maiden. Hakim is maiden. Hakim is xciv. Hakim is loopy. Hakim is pyrolignic. Hakim is not laryngeal. Hakim is not extramural. Hakim is upfront. Bernadina is maiden. Bernadina is xciv. Bernadina is loopy. Bernadina is upfront. All upfront people are loopy. Red, maiden people are loopy. All loopy people are pyrolignic. If someone is upfront and not xciv then they are not pyrolignic. If Judye is maiden then Judye is upfront. If Judye is pyrolignic and Judye is not loopy then Judye is not laryngeal. If someone is pyrolignic and not upfront then they are laryngeal. Furry, extramural people are not laryngeal. Bernadina is not laryngeal.", "logic": "\nMaiden(konstanze)\nPyrolignic(konstanze)\nLaryngeal(konstanze)\nnot Extramural(konstanze)\nMaiden(judye)\nMaiden(hakim)\nXciv(hakim)\nLoopy(hakim)\nPyrolignic(hakim)\nnot Laryngeal(hakim)\nnot Extramural(hakim)\nUpfront(hakim)\nMaiden(bernadina)\nXciv(bernadina)\nLoopy(bernadina)\nUpfront(bernadina)\nforall x (Upfront(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and Maiden(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Loopy(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nforall x (Upfront(x) and not Xciv(x) -> not Pyrolignic(x))\nMaiden(judye) -> Upfront(judye)\nPyrolignic(judye) and not Loopy(judye) -> not Laryngeal(judye)\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and not Upfront(x) -> Laryngeal(x))\nforall x (Loopy(x) and Extramural(x) -> not Laryngeal(x))\n\nnot Laryngeal(bernadina)\n\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and not Upfront(x) -> Laryngeal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Kala is flatbottom. Kala is walloping. Kala is bathyal. Kala is not germfree. Ignacio is flatbottom. Pietra is flatbottom. Pietra is unlikable. Pietra is extricable. Pietra is walloping. Pietra is not bathyal. Pietra is not germfree. Pietra is cryogenic. Napoleon is flatbottom. Napoleon is unlikable. Napoleon is extricable. Napoleon is cryogenic. All cryogenic people are extricable. Red, flatbottom people are extricable. All extricable people are walloping. If someone is cryogenic and not unlikable then they are not walloping. If Ignacio is flatbottom then Ignacio is cryogenic. If Ignacio is walloping and Ignacio is not extricable then Ignacio is not bathyal. If someone is walloping and not cryogenic then they are bathyal. Furry, germfree people are not bathyal. Ignacio is bathyal.", "logic": "\nFlatbottom(kala)\nWalloping(kala)\nBathyal(kala)\nnot Germfree(kala)\nFlatbottom(ignacio)\nFlatbottom(pietra)\nUnlikable(pietra)\nExtricable(pietra)\nWalloping(pietra)\nnot Bathyal(pietra)\nnot Germfree(pietra)\nCryogenic(pietra)\nFlatbottom(napoleon)\nUnlikable(napoleon)\nExtricable(napoleon)\nCryogenic(napoleon)\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Walloping(x) and Flatbottom(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) -> Walloping(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) and not Unlikable(x) -> not Walloping(x))\nFlatbottom(ignacio) -> Cryogenic(ignacio)\nWalloping(ignacio) and not Extricable(ignacio) -> not Bathyal(ignacio)\nforall x (Walloping(x) and not Cryogenic(x) -> Bathyal(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and Germfree(x) -> not Bathyal(x))\n\nBathyal(ignacio)\n\nforall x (Walloping(x) and not Cryogenic(x) -> Bathyal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Trixi is enolic. Trixi is sonant. Trixi is judicable. Trixi is not soggy. Sawyere is enolic. Luce is enolic. Luce is rushed. Luce is undisputed. Luce is sonant. Luce is not judicable. Luce is not soggy. Luce is seventieth. Jerrilee is enolic. Jerrilee is rushed. Jerrilee is undisputed. Jerrilee is seventieth. All seventieth people are undisputed. Red, enolic people are undisputed. All undisputed people are sonant. If someone is seventieth and not rushed then they are not sonant. If Sawyere is enolic then Sawyere is seventieth. If Sawyere is sonant and Sawyere is not undisputed then Sawyere is not judicable. If someone is sonant and not seventieth then they are judicable. Furry, soggy people are not judicable. Sawyere is not rushed.", "logic": "\nEnolic(trixi)\nSonant(trixi)\nJudicable(trixi)\nnot Soggy(trixi)\nEnolic(sawyere)\nEnolic(luce)\nRushed(luce)\nUndisputed(luce)\nSonant(luce)\nnot Judicable(luce)\nnot Soggy(luce)\nSeventieth(luce)\nEnolic(jerrilee)\nRushed(jerrilee)\nUndisputed(jerrilee)\nSeventieth(jerrilee)\nforall x (Seventieth(x) -> Undisputed(x))\nforall x (Sonant(x) and Enolic(x) -> Undisputed(x))\nforall x (Undisputed(x) -> Sonant(x))\nforall x (Seventieth(x) and not Rushed(x) -> not Sonant(x))\nEnolic(sawyere) -> Seventieth(sawyere)\nSonant(sawyere) and not Undisputed(sawyere) -> not Judicable(sawyere)\nforall x (Sonant(x) and not Seventieth(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Undisputed(x) and Soggy(x) -> not Judicable(x))\n\nnot Rushed(sawyere)\n\nnot Rushed(sawyere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Farand is chicken. Farand is abridged. Farand is measurable. Farand is not entire. Norris is chicken. Kandy is chicken. Kandy is bilabial. Kandy is calendric. Kandy is abridged. Kandy is not measurable. Kandy is not entire. Kandy is profligate. Ursuline is chicken. Ursuline is bilabial. Ursuline is calendric. Ursuline is profligate. All profligate people are calendric. Red, chicken people are calendric. All calendric people are abridged. If someone is profligate and not bilabial then they are not abridged. If Norris is chicken then Norris is profligate. If Norris is abridged and Norris is not calendric then Norris is not measurable. If someone is abridged and not profligate then they are measurable. Furry, entire people are not measurable. Farand is bilabial.", "logic": "\nChicken(farand)\nAbridged(farand)\nMeasurable(farand)\nnot Entire(farand)\nChicken(norris)\nChicken(kandy)\nBilabial(kandy)\nCalendric(kandy)\nAbridged(kandy)\nnot Measurable(kandy)\nnot Entire(kandy)\nProfligate(kandy)\nChicken(ursuline)\nBilabial(ursuline)\nCalendric(ursuline)\nProfligate(ursuline)\nforall x (Profligate(x) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) and Chicken(x) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Profligate(x) and not Bilabial(x) -> not Abridged(x))\nChicken(norris) -> Profligate(norris)\nAbridged(norris) and not Calendric(norris) -> not Measurable(norris)\nforall x (Abridged(x) and not Profligate(x) -> Measurable(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) and Entire(x) -> not Measurable(x))\n\nBilabial(farand)\n\nBilabial(farand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Ilsa is abusive. Ilsa is strategic. Ilsa is vulgar. Ilsa is not exodontic. Nettle is abusive. Maxy is abusive. Maxy is burning. Maxy is adverse. Maxy is strategic. Maxy is not vulgar. Maxy is not exodontic. Maxy is currish. Harvie is abusive. Harvie is burning. Harvie is adverse. Harvie is currish. All currish people are adverse. Red, abusive people are adverse. All adverse people are strategic. If someone is currish and not burning then they are not strategic. If Nettle is abusive then Nettle is currish. If Nettle is strategic and Nettle is not adverse then Nettle is not vulgar. If someone is strategic and not currish then they are vulgar. Furry, exodontic people are not vulgar. Nettle is not exodontic.", "logic": "\nAbusive(ilsa)\nStrategic(ilsa)\nVulgar(ilsa)\nnot Exodontic(ilsa)\nAbusive(nettle)\nAbusive(maxy)\nBurning(maxy)\nAdverse(maxy)\nStrategic(maxy)\nnot Vulgar(maxy)\nnot Exodontic(maxy)\nCurrish(maxy)\nAbusive(harvie)\nBurning(harvie)\nAdverse(harvie)\nCurrish(harvie)\nforall x (Currish(x) -> Adverse(x))\nforall x (Strategic(x) and Abusive(x) -> Adverse(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Currish(x) and not Burning(x) -> not Strategic(x))\nAbusive(nettle) -> Currish(nettle)\nStrategic(nettle) and not Adverse(nettle) -> not Vulgar(nettle)\nforall x (Strategic(x) and not Currish(x) -> Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) and Exodontic(x) -> not Vulgar(x))\n\nnot Exodontic(nettle)\n\nnot Exodontic(nettle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Marielle is oxidative. Marielle is gabled. Marielle is protean. Marielle is not mensural. Martelle is oxidative. Yetty is oxidative. Yetty is stomachal. Yetty is impelled. Yetty is gabled. Yetty is not protean. Yetty is not mensural. Yetty is alien. Mariam is oxidative. Mariam is stomachal. Mariam is impelled. Mariam is alien. All alien people are impelled. Red, oxidative people are impelled. All impelled people are gabled. If someone is alien and not stomachal then they are not gabled. If Martelle is oxidative then Martelle is alien. If Martelle is gabled and Martelle is not impelled then Martelle is not protean. If someone is gabled and not alien then they are protean. Furry, mensural people are not protean. Marielle is alien.", "logic": "\nOxidative(marielle)\nGabled(marielle)\nProtean(marielle)\nnot Mensural(marielle)\nOxidative(martelle)\nOxidative(yetty)\nStomachal(yetty)\nImpelled(yetty)\nGabled(yetty)\nnot Protean(yetty)\nnot Mensural(yetty)\nAlien(yetty)\nOxidative(mariam)\nStomachal(mariam)\nImpelled(mariam)\nAlien(mariam)\nforall x (Alien(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Gabled(x) and Oxidative(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> Gabled(x))\nforall x (Alien(x) and not Stomachal(x) -> not Gabled(x))\nOxidative(martelle) -> Alien(martelle)\nGabled(martelle) and not Impelled(martelle) -> not Protean(martelle)\nforall x (Gabled(x) and not Alien(x) -> Protean(x))\nforall x (Impelled(x) and Mensural(x) -> not Protean(x))\n\nAlien(marielle)\n\nAlien(marielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "The vickie convect the talbert. The lesly is heathen. The talbert dehorn the vickie. If something is eastmost then it convect the talbert. If the lesly hinge the talbert and the talbert convect the vickie then the lesly dehorn the vickie. If something dehorn the vickie then the vickie does not visit the lesly. If something is advanced then it is eastmost. If something dehorn the talbert and the talbert dehorn the vickie then the talbert does not see the vickie. If something dehorn the vickie and the vickie does not visit the lesly then it dehorn the talbert. The vickie convect the talbert.", "logic": "\nConvect(vickie, talbert)\nHeathen(lesly)\nDehorn(talbert, vickie)\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Convect(x, talbert))\nHinge(lesly, talbert) and Convect(talbert, vickie) -> Dehorn(lesly, vickie)\nforall x (Dehorn(x, vickie) -> not Dehorn(vickie, lesly))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Eastmost(x))\nforall x (Dehorn(x, talbert) and Dehorn(talbert, vickie) -> not Hinge(talbert, vickie))\nforall x (Dehorn(x, vickie) and not Dehorn(vickie, lesly) -> Dehorn(x, talbert))\n\nConvect(vickie, talbert)\n\ntherefore Convect(vickie, talbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The fey cleat the marybelle. The keriann is begotten. The marybelle boast the fey. If something is promising then it cleat the marybelle. If the keriann reload the marybelle and the marybelle cleat the fey then the keriann boast the fey. If something boast the fey then the fey does not visit the keriann. If something is prodromic then it is promising. If something boast the marybelle and the marybelle boast the fey then the marybelle does not see the fey. If something boast the fey and the fey does not visit the keriann then it boast the marybelle. The keriann is not begotten.", "logic": "\nCleat(fey, marybelle)\nBegotten(keriann)\nBoast(marybelle, fey)\nforall x (Promising(x) -> Cleat(x, marybelle))\nReload(keriann, marybelle) and Cleat(marybelle, fey) -> Boast(keriann, fey)\nforall x (Boast(x, fey) -> not Boast(fey, keriann))\nforall x (Prodromic(x) -> Promising(x))\nforall x (Boast(x, marybelle) and Boast(marybelle, fey) -> not Reload(marybelle, fey))\nforall x (Boast(x, fey) and not Boast(fey, keriann) -> Boast(x, marybelle))\n\nnot Begotten(keriann)\n\ntherefore Begotten(keriann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The jillane trespass the belinda. The ellsworth is joking. The belinda restrain the jillane. If something is tender then it trespass the belinda. If the ellsworth earn the belinda and the belinda trespass the jillane then the ellsworth restrain the jillane. If something restrain the jillane then the jillane does not visit the ellsworth. If something is french then it is tender. If something restrain the belinda and the belinda restrain the jillane then the belinda does not see the jillane. If something restrain the jillane and the jillane does not visit the ellsworth then it restrain the belinda. The jillane does not visit the ellsworth.", "logic": "\nTrespass(jillane, belinda)\nJoking(ellsworth)\nRestrain(belinda, jillane)\nforall x (Tender(x) -> Trespass(x, belinda))\nEarn(ellsworth, belinda) and Trespass(belinda, jillane) -> Restrain(ellsworth, jillane)\nforall x (Restrain(x, jillane) -> not Restrain(jillane, ellsworth))\nforall x (French(x) -> Tender(x))\nforall x (Restrain(x, belinda) and Restrain(belinda, jillane) -> not Earn(belinda, jillane))\nforall x (Restrain(x, jillane) and not Restrain(jillane, ellsworth) -> Restrain(x, belinda))\n\nnot Restrain(jillane, ellsworth)\n\nRestrain(belinda, jillane) and forall x (Restrain(x, jillane) -> not Restrain(jillane, ellsworth)) -> therefore not Restrain(jillane, ellsworth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The aura withhold the nettie. The erma is unpromised. The nettie drown the aura. If something is ungarbed then it withhold the nettie. If the erma score the nettie and the nettie withhold the aura then the erma drown the aura. If something drown the aura then the aura does not visit the erma. If something is auricular then it is ungarbed. If something drown the nettie and the nettie drown the aura then the nettie does not see the aura. If something drown the aura and the aura does not visit the erma then it drown the nettie. The aura drown the erma.", "logic": "\nWithhold(aura, nettie)\nUnpromised(erma)\nDrown(nettie, aura)\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Withhold(x, nettie))\nScore(erma, nettie) and Withhold(nettie, aura) -> Drown(erma, aura)\nforall x (Drown(x, aura) -> not Drown(aura, erma))\nforall x (Auricular(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Drown(x, nettie) and Drown(nettie, aura) -> not Score(nettie, aura))\nforall x (Drown(x, aura) and not Drown(aura, erma) -> Drown(x, nettie))\n\nDrown(aura, erma)\n\nDrown(nettie, aura) and forall x (Drown(x, aura) -> not Drown(aura, erma)) -> therefore not Drown(aura, erma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The nathalia catch the clancy. The noach is elegiac. The clancy pommel the nathalia. If something is friable then it catch the clancy. If the noach imbue the clancy and the clancy catch the nathalia then the noach pommel the nathalia. If something pommel the nathalia then the nathalia does not visit the noach. If something is voluptuary then it is friable. If something pommel the clancy and the clancy pommel the nathalia then the clancy does not see the nathalia. If something pommel the nathalia and the nathalia does not visit the noach then it pommel the clancy. The clancy pommel the clancy.", "logic": "\nCatch(nathalia, clancy)\nElegiac(noach)\nPommel(clancy, nathalia)\nforall x (Friable(x) -> Catch(x, clancy))\nImbue(noach, clancy) and Catch(clancy, nathalia) -> Pommel(noach, nathalia)\nforall x (Pommel(x, nathalia) -> not Pommel(nathalia, noach))\nforall x (Voluptuary(x) -> Friable(x))\nforall x (Pommel(x, clancy) and Pommel(clancy, nathalia) -> not Imbue(clancy, nathalia))\nforall x (Pommel(x, nathalia) and not Pommel(nathalia, noach) -> Pommel(x, clancy))\n\nPommel(clancy, clancy)\n\nPommel(clancy, nathalia) and forall x (Pommel(x, nathalia) -> not Pommel(nathalia, noach)) -> therefore not Pommel(nathalia, noach) Pommel(clancy, nathalia) and not Pommel(nathalia, noach) and forall x (Pommel(x, nathalia) and not Pommel(nathalia, noach) -> Pommel(x, clancy)) -> therefore Pommel(clancy, clancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The tera toady the elwyn. The helise is tapped. The elwyn file the tera. If something is unitarian then it toady the elwyn. If the helise blare the elwyn and the elwyn toady the tera then the helise file the tera. If something file the tera then the tera does not visit the helise. If something is homophobic then it is unitarian. If something file the elwyn and the elwyn file the tera then the elwyn does not see the tera. If something file the tera and the tera does not visit the helise then it file the elwyn. The elwyn does not visit the elwyn.", "logic": "\nToady(tera, elwyn)\nTapped(helise)\nFile(elwyn, tera)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Toady(x, elwyn))\nBlare(helise, elwyn) and Toady(elwyn, tera) -> File(helise, tera)\nforall x (File(x, tera) -> not File(tera, helise))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (File(x, elwyn) and File(elwyn, tera) -> not Blare(elwyn, tera))\nforall x (File(x, tera) and not File(tera, helise) -> File(x, elwyn))\n\nnot File(elwyn, elwyn)\n\nFile(elwyn, tera) and forall x (File(x, tera) -> not File(tera, helise)) -> therefore not File(tera, helise) File(elwyn, tera) and not File(tera, helise) and forall x (File(x, tera) and not File(tera, helise) -> File(x, elwyn)) -> therefore File(elwyn, elwyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The averyl sing the perla. The fritz is unbridled. The perla stir the averyl. If something is eritrean then it sing the perla. If the fritz collar the perla and the perla sing the averyl then the fritz stir the averyl. If something stir the averyl then the averyl does not visit the fritz. If something is chylific then it is eritrean. If something stir the perla and the perla stir the averyl then the perla does not see the averyl. If something stir the averyl and the averyl does not visit the fritz then it stir the perla. The perla does not see the averyl.", "logic": "\nSing(averyl, perla)\nUnbridled(fritz)\nStir(perla, averyl)\nforall x (Eritrean(x) -> Sing(x, perla))\nCollar(fritz, perla) and Sing(perla, averyl) -> Stir(fritz, averyl)\nforall x (Stir(x, averyl) -> not Stir(averyl, fritz))\nforall x (Chylific(x) -> Eritrean(x))\nforall x (Stir(x, perla) and Stir(perla, averyl) -> not Collar(perla, averyl))\nforall x (Stir(x, averyl) and not Stir(averyl, fritz) -> Stir(x, perla))\n\nnot Collar(perla, averyl)\n\nStir(perla, averyl) and forall x (Stir(x, averyl) -> not Stir(averyl, fritz)) -> therefore not Stir(averyl, fritz) Stir(perla, averyl) and not Stir(averyl, fritz) and forall x (Stir(x, averyl) and not Stir(averyl, fritz) -> Stir(x, perla)) -> therefore Stir(perla, perla) Stir(perla, perla) and Stir(perla, averyl) and forall x (Stir(x, perla) and Stir(perla, averyl) -> not Collar(perla, averyl)) -> therefore not Collar(perla, averyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The beret tink the ina. The herb is unwaxed. The ina prolong the beret. If something is amphoteric then it tink the ina. If the herb resonate the ina and the ina tink the beret then the herb prolong the beret. If something prolong the beret then the beret does not visit the herb. If something is errhine then it is amphoteric. If something prolong the ina and the ina prolong the beret then the ina does not see the beret. If something prolong the beret and the beret does not visit the herb then it prolong the ina. The ina resonate the beret.", "logic": "\nTink(beret, ina)\nUnwaxed(herb)\nProlong(ina, beret)\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) -> Tink(x, ina))\nResonate(herb, ina) and Tink(ina, beret) -> Prolong(herb, beret)\nforall x (Prolong(x, beret) -> not Prolong(beret, herb))\nforall x (Errhine(x) -> Amphoteric(x))\nforall x (Prolong(x, ina) and Prolong(ina, beret) -> not Resonate(ina, beret))\nforall x (Prolong(x, beret) and not Prolong(beret, herb) -> Prolong(x, ina))\n\nResonate(ina, beret)\n\nProlong(ina, beret) and forall x (Prolong(x, beret) -> not Prolong(beret, herb)) -> therefore not Prolong(beret, herb) Prolong(ina, beret) and not Prolong(beret, herb) and forall x (Prolong(x, beret) and not Prolong(beret, herb) -> Prolong(x, ina)) -> therefore Prolong(ina, ina) Prolong(ina, ina) and Prolong(ina, beret) and forall x (Prolong(x, ina) and Prolong(ina, beret) -> not Resonate(ina, beret)) -> therefore not Resonate(ina, beret)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The eli besiege the fredi. The maud is combed. The fredi lend the eli. If something is behindhand then it besiege the fredi. If the maud tweeze the fredi and the fredi besiege the eli then the maud lend the eli. If something lend the eli then the eli does not visit the maud. If something is keeled then it is behindhand. If something lend the fredi and the fredi lend the eli then the fredi does not see the eli. If something lend the eli and the eli does not visit the maud then it lend the fredi. The maud does not visit the fredi.", "logic": "\nBesiege(eli, fredi)\nCombed(maud)\nLend(fredi, eli)\nforall x (Behindhand(x) -> Besiege(x, fredi))\nTweeze(maud, fredi) and Besiege(fredi, eli) -> Lend(maud, eli)\nforall x (Lend(x, eli) -> not Lend(eli, maud))\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Behindhand(x))\nforall x (Lend(x, fredi) and Lend(fredi, eli) -> not Tweeze(fredi, eli))\nforall x (Lend(x, eli) and not Lend(eli, maud) -> Lend(x, fredi))\n\nnot Lend(maud, fredi)\n\nforall x (Lend(x, eli) and not Lend(eli, maud) -> Lend(x, fredi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The allene glisten the cecily. The amalie is bivariate. The cecily ding the allene. If something is revocable then it glisten the cecily. If the amalie corrade the cecily and the cecily glisten the allene then the amalie ding the allene. If something ding the allene then the allene does not visit the amalie. If something is veridical then it is revocable. If something ding the cecily and the cecily ding the allene then the cecily does not see the allene. If something ding the allene and the allene does not visit the amalie then it ding the cecily. The amalie ding the allene.", "logic": "\nGlisten(allene, cecily)\nBivariate(amalie)\nDing(cecily, allene)\nforall x (Revocable(x) -> Glisten(x, cecily))\nCorrade(amalie, cecily) and Glisten(cecily, allene) -> Ding(amalie, allene)\nforall x (Ding(x, allene) -> not Ding(allene, amalie))\nforall x (Veridical(x) -> Revocable(x))\nforall x (Ding(x, cecily) and Ding(cecily, allene) -> not Corrade(cecily, allene))\nforall x (Ding(x, allene) and not Ding(allene, amalie) -> Ding(x, cecily))\n\nDing(amalie, allene)\n\nCorrade(amalie, cecily) and Glisten(cecily, allene) -> Ding(amalie, allene) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The wolfram alter the liane. The heidie is atrip. The liane transact the wolfram. If something is aghast then it alter the liane. If the heidie librate the liane and the liane alter the wolfram then the heidie transact the wolfram. If something transact the wolfram then the wolfram does not visit the heidie. If something is nodulated then it is aghast. If something transact the liane and the liane transact the wolfram then the liane does not see the wolfram. If something transact the wolfram and the wolfram does not visit the heidie then it transact the liane. The liane does not eat the liane.", "logic": "\nAlter(wolfram, liane)\nAtrip(heidie)\nTransact(liane, wolfram)\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Alter(x, liane))\nLibrate(heidie, liane) and Alter(liane, wolfram) -> Transact(heidie, wolfram)\nforall x (Transact(x, wolfram) -> not Transact(wolfram, heidie))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Transact(x, liane) and Transact(liane, wolfram) -> not Librate(liane, wolfram))\nforall x (Transact(x, wolfram) and not Transact(wolfram, heidie) -> Transact(x, liane))\n\nnot Alter(liane, liane)\n\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Alter(x, liane)) <- forall x (Nodulated(x) -> Aghast(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The rochette unmask the coreen. The anson is unsalable. The coreen unsettle the rochette. If something is serrulate then it unmask the coreen. If the anson popularise the coreen and the coreen unmask the rochette then the anson unsettle the rochette. If something unsettle the rochette then the rochette does not visit the anson. If something is pithy then it is serrulate. If something unsettle the coreen and the coreen unsettle the rochette then the coreen does not see the rochette. If something unsettle the rochette and the rochette does not visit the anson then it unsettle the coreen. The rochette is serrulate.", "logic": "\nUnmask(rochette, coreen)\nUnsalable(anson)\nUnsettle(coreen, rochette)\nforall x (Serrulate(x) -> Unmask(x, coreen))\nPopularise(anson, coreen) and Unmask(coreen, rochette) -> Unsettle(anson, rochette)\nforall x (Unsettle(x, rochette) -> not Unsettle(rochette, anson))\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> Serrulate(x))\nforall x (Unsettle(x, coreen) and Unsettle(coreen, rochette) -> not Popularise(coreen, rochette))\nforall x (Unsettle(x, rochette) and not Unsettle(rochette, anson) -> Unsettle(x, coreen))\n\nSerrulate(rochette)\n\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> Serrulate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The owen communize the ferinand. The suzann is punic. The ferinand slabber the owen. If something is epileptic then it communize the ferinand. If the suzann sneer the ferinand and the ferinand communize the owen then the suzann slabber the owen. If something slabber the owen then the owen does not visit the suzann. If something is huge then it is epileptic. If something slabber the ferinand and the ferinand slabber the owen then the ferinand does not see the owen. If something slabber the owen and the owen does not visit the suzann then it slabber the ferinand. The owen does not see the ferinand.", "logic": "\nCommunize(owen, ferinand)\nPunic(suzann)\nSlabber(ferinand, owen)\nforall x (Epileptic(x) -> Communize(x, ferinand))\nSneer(suzann, ferinand) and Communize(ferinand, owen) -> Slabber(suzann, owen)\nforall x (Slabber(x, owen) -> not Slabber(owen, suzann))\nforall x (Huge(x) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Slabber(x, ferinand) and Slabber(ferinand, owen) -> not Sneer(ferinand, owen))\nforall x (Slabber(x, owen) and not Slabber(owen, suzann) -> Slabber(x, ferinand))\n\nnot Sneer(owen, ferinand)\n\nnot Sneer(owen, ferinand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The chandal kennel the creighton. The leila is jangly. The creighton present the chandal. If something is dispersed then it kennel the creighton. If the leila bend the creighton and the creighton kennel the chandal then the leila present the chandal. If something present the chandal then the chandal does not visit the leila. If something is homely then it is dispersed. If something present the creighton and the creighton present the chandal then the creighton does not see the chandal. If something present the chandal and the chandal does not visit the leila then it present the creighton. The chandal kennel the chandal.", "logic": "\nKennel(chandal, creighton)\nJangly(leila)\nPresent(creighton, chandal)\nforall x (Dispersed(x) -> Kennel(x, creighton))\nBend(leila, creighton) and Kennel(creighton, chandal) -> Present(leila, chandal)\nforall x (Present(x, chandal) -> not Present(chandal, leila))\nforall x (Homely(x) -> Dispersed(x))\nforall x (Present(x, creighton) and Present(creighton, chandal) -> not Bend(creighton, chandal))\nforall x (Present(x, chandal) and not Present(chandal, leila) -> Present(x, creighton))\n\nKennel(chandal, chandal)\n\nKennel(chandal, chandal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The alissa enforce the kimmo. The rudiger is panoramic. The kimmo bitt the alissa. If something is powdery then it enforce the kimmo. If the rudiger succor the kimmo and the kimmo enforce the alissa then the rudiger bitt the alissa. If something bitt the alissa then the alissa does not visit the rudiger. If something is copious then it is powdery. If something bitt the kimmo and the kimmo bitt the alissa then the kimmo does not see the alissa. If something bitt the alissa and the alissa does not visit the rudiger then it bitt the kimmo. The kimmo does not eat the alissa.", "logic": "\nEnforce(alissa, kimmo)\nPanoramic(rudiger)\nBitt(kimmo, alissa)\nforall x (Powdery(x) -> Enforce(x, kimmo))\nSuccor(rudiger, kimmo) and Enforce(kimmo, alissa) -> Bitt(rudiger, alissa)\nforall x (Bitt(x, alissa) -> not Bitt(alissa, rudiger))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Powdery(x))\nforall x (Bitt(x, kimmo) and Bitt(kimmo, alissa) -> not Succor(kimmo, alissa))\nforall x (Bitt(x, alissa) and not Bitt(alissa, rudiger) -> Bitt(x, kimmo))\n\nnot Enforce(kimmo, alissa)\n\nnot Enforce(kimmo, alissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The rickard canal the ariella. The madelon is painful. The ariella update the rickard. If something is dubious then it canal the ariella. If the madelon automobile the ariella and the ariella canal the rickard then the madelon update the rickard. If something update the rickard then the rickard does not visit the madelon. If something is botswanan then it is dubious. If something update the ariella and the ariella update the rickard then the ariella does not see the rickard. If something update the rickard and the rickard does not visit the madelon then it update the ariella. The ariella is botswanan.", "logic": "\nCanal(rickard, ariella)\nPainful(madelon)\nUpdate(ariella, rickard)\nforall x (Dubious(x) -> Canal(x, ariella))\nAutomobile(madelon, ariella) and Canal(ariella, rickard) -> Update(madelon, rickard)\nforall x (Update(x, rickard) -> not Update(rickard, madelon))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Update(x, ariella) and Update(ariella, rickard) -> not Automobile(ariella, rickard))\nforall x (Update(x, rickard) and not Update(rickard, madelon) -> Update(x, ariella))\n\nBotswanan(ariella)\n\nBotswanan(ariella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Merilee is leeward. Dionysus is pinnated. Glenna is hyperbolic. Jane is pinnated. All leeward things are imaginary. Rough things are pinnated. Rough things are provencal. Nice things are dendroid. If Jane is dendroid and Jane is leeward then Jane is weather. If Dionysus is pinnated then Dionysus is weather. Dionysus is pinnated.", "logic": "\nLeeward(merilee)\nPinnated(dionysus)\nHyperbolic(glenna)\nPinnated(jane)\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Imaginary(x))\nforall x (Dendroid(x) -> Pinnated(x))\nforall x (Dendroid(x) -> Provencal(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) -> Dendroid(x))\nDendroid(jane) and Leeward(jane) -> Weather(jane)\nPinnated(dionysus) -> Weather(dionysus)\n\nPinnated(dionysus)\n\ntherefore Pinnated(dionysus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Corenda is astrocytic. Sukey is foster. Karlee is nubbly. Elwina is foster. All astrocytic things are inbuilt. Rough things are foster. Rough things are dumpy. Nice things are canted. If Elwina is canted and Elwina is astrocytic then Elwina is monied. If Sukey is foster then Sukey is monied. Elwina is not foster.", "logic": "\nAstrocytic(corenda)\nFoster(sukey)\nNubbly(karlee)\nFoster(elwina)\nforall x (Astrocytic(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Dumpy(x))\nforall x (Monied(x) -> Canted(x))\nCanted(elwina) and Astrocytic(elwina) -> Monied(elwina)\nFoster(sukey) -> Monied(sukey)\n\nnot Foster(elwina)\n\ntherefore Foster(elwina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Marylinda is dire. Annalise is persuasive. Rita is rootbound. Ilona is persuasive. All dire things are determined. Rough things are persuasive. Rough things are bluff. Nice things are cuplike. If Ilona is cuplike and Ilona is dire then Ilona is crummy. If Annalise is persuasive then Annalise is crummy. Annalise is crummy.", "logic": "\nDire(marylinda)\nPersuasive(annalise)\nRootbound(rita)\nPersuasive(ilona)\nforall x (Dire(x) -> Determined(x))\nforall x (Cuplike(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Cuplike(x) -> Bluff(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nCuplike(ilona) and Dire(ilona) -> Crummy(ilona)\nPersuasive(annalise) -> Crummy(annalise)\n\nCrummy(annalise)\n\nPersuasive(annalise) and Persuasive(annalise) -> Crummy(annalise) -> therefore Crummy(annalise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Gerianne is lxxxvi. Teri is calceolate. Obadias is conical. Jourdan is calceolate. All lxxxvi things are remiss. Rough things are calceolate. Rough things are meaningful. Nice things are napped. If Jourdan is napped and Jourdan is lxxxvi then Jourdan is bunchy. If Teri is calceolate then Teri is bunchy. Gerianne is not remiss.", "logic": "\nLxxxvi(gerianne)\nCalceolate(teri)\nConical(obadias)\nCalceolate(jourdan)\nforall x (Lxxxvi(x) -> Remiss(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) -> Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Bunchy(x) -> Napped(x))\nNapped(jourdan) and Lxxxvi(jourdan) -> Bunchy(jourdan)\nCalceolate(teri) -> Bunchy(teri)\n\nnot Remiss(gerianne)\n\nLxxxvi(gerianne) and forall x (Lxxxvi(x) -> Remiss(x)) -> therefore Remiss(gerianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Ebenezer is metameric. Fergus is regulation. Valentia is unrouged. Pearla is regulation. All metameric things are trochaic. Rough things are regulation. Rough things are highbrowed. Nice things are amatory. If Pearla is amatory and Pearla is metameric then Pearla is descendant. If Fergus is regulation then Fergus is descendant. Fergus is amatory.", "logic": "\nMetameric(ebenezer)\nRegulation(fergus)\nUnrouged(valentia)\nRegulation(pearla)\nforall x (Metameric(x) -> Trochaic(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Regulation(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Highbrowed(x))\nforall x (Descendant(x) -> Amatory(x))\nAmatory(pearla) and Metameric(pearla) -> Descendant(pearla)\nRegulation(fergus) -> Descendant(fergus)\n\nAmatory(fergus)\n\nRegulation(fergus) and Regulation(fergus) -> Descendant(fergus) -> therefore Descendant(fergus) Descendant(fergus) and forall x (Descendant(x) -> Amatory(x)) -> therefore Amatory(fergus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Othilia is damaging. Grata is viricidal. Arabele is stratified. Audrey is viricidal. All damaging things are here. Rough things are viricidal. Rough things are uneventful. Nice things are unmindful. If Audrey is unmindful and Audrey is damaging then Audrey is ammonitic. If Grata is viricidal then Grata is ammonitic. Grata is not unmindful.", "logic": "\nDamaging(othilia)\nViricidal(grata)\nStratified(arabele)\nViricidal(audrey)\nforall x (Damaging(x) -> Here(x))\nforall x (Unmindful(x) -> Viricidal(x))\nforall x (Unmindful(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Unmindful(x))\nUnmindful(audrey) and Damaging(audrey) -> Ammonitic(audrey)\nViricidal(grata) -> Ammonitic(grata)\n\nnot Unmindful(grata)\n\nViricidal(grata) and Viricidal(grata) -> Ammonitic(grata) -> therefore Ammonitic(grata) Ammonitic(grata) and forall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Unmindful(x)) -> therefore Unmindful(grata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Hersh is inflatable. Emeline is unexploded. Christina is blinking. Ilyse is unexploded. All inflatable things are deciduous. Rough things are unexploded. Rough things are algonkian. Nice things are innermost. If Ilyse is innermost and Ilyse is inflatable then Ilyse is voltaic. If Emeline is unexploded then Emeline is voltaic. Emeline is algonkian.", "logic": "\nInflatable(hersh)\nUnexploded(emeline)\nBlinking(christina)\nUnexploded(ilyse)\nforall x (Inflatable(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nforall x (Innermost(x) -> Unexploded(x))\nforall x (Innermost(x) -> Algonkian(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) -> Innermost(x))\nInnermost(ilyse) and Inflatable(ilyse) -> Voltaic(ilyse)\nUnexploded(emeline) -> Voltaic(emeline)\n\nAlgonkian(emeline)\n\nUnexploded(emeline) and Unexploded(emeline) -> Voltaic(emeline) -> therefore Voltaic(emeline) Voltaic(emeline) and forall x (Voltaic(x) -> Innermost(x)) -> therefore Innermost(emeline) Innermost(emeline) and forall x (Innermost(x) -> Algonkian(x)) -> therefore Algonkian(emeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Kate is unpolished. Stuart is upward. Tarrant is chartreuse. Missie is upward. All unpolished things are binominal. Rough things are upward. Rough things are temporary. Nice things are rippled. If Missie is rippled and Missie is unpolished then Missie is divergent. If Stuart is upward then Stuart is divergent. Stuart is not temporary.", "logic": "\nUnpolished(kate)\nUpward(stuart)\nChartreuse(tarrant)\nUpward(missie)\nforall x (Unpolished(x) -> Binominal(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) -> Temporary(x))\nforall x (Divergent(x) -> Rippled(x))\nRippled(missie) and Unpolished(missie) -> Divergent(missie)\nUpward(stuart) -> Divergent(stuart)\n\nnot Temporary(stuart)\n\nUpward(stuart) and Upward(stuart) -> Divergent(stuart) -> therefore Divergent(stuart) Divergent(stuart) and forall x (Divergent(x) -> Rippled(x)) -> therefore Rippled(stuart) Rippled(stuart) and forall x (Rippled(x) -> Temporary(x)) -> therefore Temporary(stuart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Mellicent is sorrowful. Aura is phony. Merrick is meagerly. Kerstin is phony. All sorrowful things are stellate. Rough things are phony. Rough things are acinic. Nice things are needful. If Kerstin is needful and Kerstin is sorrowful then Kerstin is monopteral. If Aura is phony then Aura is monopteral. Merrick is not stellate.", "logic": "\nSorrowful(mellicent)\nPhony(aura)\nMeagerly(merrick)\nPhony(kerstin)\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Needful(x) -> Phony(x))\nforall x (Needful(x) -> Acinic(x))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) -> Needful(x))\nNeedful(kerstin) and Sorrowful(kerstin) -> Monopteral(kerstin)\nPhony(aura) -> Monopteral(aura)\n\nnot Stellate(merrick)\n\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) -> Stellate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Hagen is semiotical. Valaree is hindustani. Linus is earthborn. Roda is hindustani. All semiotical things are libellous. Rough things are hindustani. Rough things are baseborn. Nice things are picky. If Roda is picky and Roda is semiotical then Roda is deviate. If Valaree is hindustani then Valaree is deviate. Hagen is hindustani.", "logic": "\nSemiotical(hagen)\nHindustani(valaree)\nEarthborn(linus)\nHindustani(roda)\nforall x (Semiotical(x) -> Libellous(x))\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Hindustani(x))\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Picky(x))\nPicky(roda) and Semiotical(roda) -> Deviate(roda)\nHindustani(valaree) -> Deviate(valaree)\n\nHindustani(hagen)\n\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Hindustani(x)) <- forall x (Deviate(x) -> Picky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Sal is aerated. Algernon is pillared. Lelia is impelling. Melanie is pillared. All aerated things are vicarious. Rough things are pillared. Rough things are stainable. Nice things are overripe. If Melanie is overripe and Melanie is aerated then Melanie is unpaved. If Algernon is pillared then Algernon is unpaved. Melanie is not vicarious.", "logic": "\nAerated(sal)\nPillared(algernon)\nImpelling(lelia)\nPillared(melanie)\nforall x (Aerated(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Unpaved(x) -> Overripe(x))\nOverripe(melanie) and Aerated(melanie) -> Unpaved(melanie)\nPillared(algernon) -> Unpaved(algernon)\n\nnot Vicarious(melanie)\n\nforall x (Aerated(x) -> Vicarious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Edyth is uncharged. Jorry is freudian. Kevina is bulbed. Prent is freudian. All uncharged things are quintuple. Rough things are freudian. Rough things are slipshod. Nice things are ibsenian. If Prent is ibsenian and Prent is uncharged then Prent is tractable. If Jorry is freudian then Jorry is tractable. Prent is slipshod.", "logic": "\nUncharged(edyth)\nFreudian(jorry)\nBulbed(kevina)\nFreudian(prent)\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Quintuple(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Freudian(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Tractable(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nIbsenian(prent) and Uncharged(prent) -> Tractable(prent)\nFreudian(jorry) -> Tractable(jorry)\n\nSlipshod(prent)\n\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Slipshod(x)) <- forall x (Tractable(x) -> Ibsenian(x)) <- Ibsenian(prent) and Uncharged(prent) -> Tractable(prent) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Agustin is shattering. Adah is yearlong. Artur is rabid. Brook is yearlong. All shattering things are writhen. Rough things are yearlong. Rough things are horned. Nice things are arrogant. If Brook is arrogant and Brook is shattering then Brook is bungled. If Adah is yearlong then Adah is bungled. Artur is not bungled.", "logic": "\nShattering(agustin)\nYearlong(adah)\nRabid(artur)\nYearlong(brook)\nforall x (Shattering(x) -> Writhen(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Yearlong(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Bungled(x) -> Arrogant(x))\nArrogant(brook) and Shattering(brook) -> Bungled(brook)\nYearlong(adah) -> Bungled(adah)\n\nnot Bungled(artur)\n\nnot Bungled(artur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Gerry is feudal. Elysee is floppy. Tomi is xviii. Barbie is floppy. All feudal things are primaeval. Rough things are floppy. Rough things are electrical. Nice things are front. If Barbie is front and Barbie is feudal then Barbie is acetonic. If Elysee is floppy then Elysee is acetonic. Gerry is acetonic.", "logic": "\nFeudal(gerry)\nFloppy(elysee)\nXviii(tomi)\nFloppy(barbie)\nforall x (Feudal(x) -> Primaeval(x))\nforall x (Front(x) -> Floppy(x))\nforall x (Front(x) -> Electrical(x))\nforall x (Acetonic(x) -> Front(x))\nFront(barbie) and Feudal(barbie) -> Acetonic(barbie)\nFloppy(elysee) -> Acetonic(elysee)\n\nAcetonic(gerry)\n\nAcetonic(gerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Pete is sapiens. Gerald is unedited. Merl is comradely. Alfonse is unedited. All sapiens things are particular. Rough things are unedited. Rough things are lissom. Nice things are maximal. If Alfonse is maximal and Alfonse is sapiens then Alfonse is comburent. If Gerald is unedited then Gerald is comburent. Alfonse is not sapiens.", "logic": "\nSapiens(pete)\nUnedited(gerald)\nComradely(merl)\nUnedited(alfonse)\nforall x (Sapiens(x) -> Particular(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) -> Unedited(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) -> Lissom(x))\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> Maximal(x))\nMaximal(alfonse) and Sapiens(alfonse) -> Comburent(alfonse)\nUnedited(gerald) -> Comburent(gerald)\n\nnot Sapiens(alfonse)\n\nnot Sapiens(alfonse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Novelia is streaked. Ermina is synonymous. Danell is anchoritic. Anders is synonymous. All streaked things are worthy. Rough things are synonymous. Rough things are iodinating. Nice things are beguiling. If Anders is beguiling and Anders is streaked then Anders is amorous. If Ermina is synonymous then Ermina is amorous. Danell is streaked.", "logic": "\nStreaked(novelia)\nSynonymous(ermina)\nAnchoritic(danell)\nSynonymous(anders)\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Worthy(x))\nforall x (Beguiling(x) -> Synonymous(x))\nforall x (Beguiling(x) -> Iodinating(x))\nforall x (Amorous(x) -> Beguiling(x))\nBeguiling(anders) and Streaked(anders) -> Amorous(anders)\nSynonymous(ermina) -> Amorous(ermina)\n\nStreaked(danell)\n\nStreaked(danell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Ellsworth is brackish. Halley is atomic. Arleyne is not upstage. Cecelia is ingenious. If Halley is brackish then Halley is grabby. If someone is upstage then they are grabby. If someone is atomic then they are amyloid. If someone is brackish and not carpellate then they are amyloid. Kind people are brackish. If Ellsworth is upstage and Ellsworth is not amyloid then Ellsworth is ingenious. Arleyne is not upstage.", "logic": "\nBrackish(ellsworth)\nAtomic(halley)\nnot Upstage(arleyne)\nIngenious(cecelia)\nBrackish(halley) -> Grabby(halley)\nforall x (Upstage(x) -> Grabby(x))\nforall x (Atomic(x) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Brackish(x) and not Carpellate(x) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Amyloid(x) -> Brackish(x))\nUpstage(ellsworth) and not Amyloid(ellsworth) -> Ingenious(ellsworth)\n\nnot Upstage(arleyne)\n\ntherefore not Upstage(arleyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Clayton is remote. Sonnie is stinting. Gera is not essential. Charlott is antecedent. If Sonnie is remote then Sonnie is vulcanised. If someone is essential then they are vulcanised. If someone is stinting then they are jubilant. If someone is remote and not stagey then they are jubilant. Kind people are remote. If Clayton is essential and Clayton is not jubilant then Clayton is antecedent. Sonnie is not stinting.", "logic": "\nRemote(clayton)\nStinting(sonnie)\nnot Essential(gera)\nAntecedent(charlott)\nRemote(sonnie) -> Vulcanised(sonnie)\nforall x (Essential(x) -> Vulcanised(x))\nforall x (Stinting(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Remote(x) and not Stagey(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) -> Remote(x))\nEssential(clayton) and not Jubilant(clayton) -> Antecedent(clayton)\n\nnot Stinting(sonnie)\n\ntherefore Stinting(sonnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "June is confined. Rosemonde is chapfallen. Marcelia is not geodesical. Haleigh is woven. If Rosemonde is confined then Rosemonde is saxicolous. If someone is geodesical then they are saxicolous. If someone is chapfallen then they are apart. If someone is confined and not tubby then they are apart. Kind people are confined. If June is geodesical and June is not apart then June is woven. Rosemonde is apart.", "logic": "\nConfined(june)\nChapfallen(rosemonde)\nnot Geodesical(marcelia)\nWoven(haleigh)\nConfined(rosemonde) -> Saxicolous(rosemonde)\nforall x (Geodesical(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) -> Apart(x))\nforall x (Confined(x) and not Tubby(x) -> Apart(x))\nforall x (Apart(x) -> Confined(x))\nGeodesical(june) and not Apart(june) -> Woven(june)\n\nApart(rosemonde)\n\nChapfallen(rosemonde) and forall x (Chapfallen(x) -> Apart(x)) -> therefore Apart(rosemonde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Roselle is numberless. Juana is toothed. Stanislaw is not overdue. Ebeneser is ghostlike. If Juana is numberless then Juana is geologic. If someone is overdue then they are geologic. If someone is toothed then they are pathogenic. If someone is numberless and not thespian then they are pathogenic. Kind people are numberless. If Roselle is overdue and Roselle is not pathogenic then Roselle is ghostlike. Juana is not pathogenic.", "logic": "\nNumberless(roselle)\nToothed(juana)\nnot Overdue(stanislaw)\nGhostlike(ebeneser)\nNumberless(juana) -> Geologic(juana)\nforall x (Overdue(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Toothed(x) -> Pathogenic(x))\nforall x (Numberless(x) and not Thespian(x) -> Pathogenic(x))\nforall x (Pathogenic(x) -> Numberless(x))\nOverdue(roselle) and not Pathogenic(roselle) -> Ghostlike(roselle)\n\nnot Pathogenic(juana)\n\nToothed(juana) and forall x (Toothed(x) -> Pathogenic(x)) -> therefore Pathogenic(juana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Rustie is unshapen. Roderic is dietetic. Sauncho is not kindled. Werner is crustose. If Roderic is unshapen then Roderic is hammered. If someone is kindled then they are hammered. If someone is dietetic then they are spouting. If someone is unshapen and not reversive then they are spouting. Kind people are unshapen. If Rustie is kindled and Rustie is not spouting then Rustie is crustose. Roderic is unshapen.", "logic": "\nUnshapen(rustie)\nDietetic(roderic)\nnot Kindled(sauncho)\nCrustose(werner)\nUnshapen(roderic) -> Hammered(roderic)\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Hammered(x))\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) and not Reversive(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Unshapen(x))\nKindled(rustie) and not Spouting(rustie) -> Crustose(rustie)\n\nUnshapen(roderic)\n\nDietetic(roderic) and forall x (Dietetic(x) -> Spouting(x)) -> therefore Spouting(roderic) Spouting(roderic) and forall x (Spouting(x) -> Unshapen(x)) -> therefore Unshapen(roderic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Skye is accepting. Elicia is seeping. Suzann is not lethargic. Lay is saturated. If Elicia is accepting then Elicia is pubescent. If someone is lethargic then they are pubescent. If someone is seeping then they are labelled. If someone is accepting and not myocardial then they are labelled. Kind people are accepting. If Skye is lethargic and Skye is not labelled then Skye is saturated. Elicia is not accepting.", "logic": "\nAccepting(skye)\nSeeping(elicia)\nnot Lethargic(suzann)\nSaturated(lay)\nAccepting(elicia) -> Pubescent(elicia)\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Pubescent(x))\nforall x (Seeping(x) -> Labelled(x))\nforall x (Accepting(x) and not Myocardial(x) -> Labelled(x))\nforall x (Labelled(x) -> Accepting(x))\nLethargic(skye) and not Labelled(skye) -> Saturated(skye)\n\nnot Accepting(elicia)\n\nSeeping(elicia) and forall x (Seeping(x) -> Labelled(x)) -> therefore Labelled(elicia) Labelled(elicia) and forall x (Labelled(x) -> Accepting(x)) -> therefore Accepting(elicia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Mommy is chichi. Zarah is complete. Selle is not disquieted. Dulsea is shintoist. If Zarah is chichi then Zarah is defensible. If someone is disquieted then they are defensible. If someone is complete then they are found. If someone is chichi and not perfect then they are found. Kind people are chichi. If Mommy is disquieted and Mommy is not found then Mommy is shintoist. Zarah is defensible.", "logic": "\nChichi(mommy)\nComplete(zarah)\nnot Disquieted(selle)\nShintoist(dulsea)\nChichi(zarah) -> Defensible(zarah)\nforall x (Disquieted(x) -> Defensible(x))\nforall x (Complete(x) -> Found(x))\nforall x (Chichi(x) and not Perfect(x) -> Found(x))\nforall x (Found(x) -> Chichi(x))\nDisquieted(mommy) and not Found(mommy) -> Shintoist(mommy)\n\nDefensible(zarah)\n\nComplete(zarah) and forall x (Complete(x) -> Found(x)) -> therefore Found(zarah) Found(zarah) and forall x (Found(x) -> Chichi(x)) -> therefore Chichi(zarah) Chichi(zarah) and Chichi(zarah) -> Defensible(zarah) -> therefore Defensible(zarah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Rosemary is gone. Mose is chuffed. Melisenda is not resolvable. Sheena is pitiable. If Mose is gone then Mose is sporting. If someone is resolvable then they are sporting. If someone is chuffed then they are additional. If someone is gone and not lousy then they are additional. Kind people are gone. If Rosemary is resolvable and Rosemary is not additional then Rosemary is pitiable. Mose is not sporting.", "logic": "\nGone(rosemary)\nChuffed(mose)\nnot Resolvable(melisenda)\nPitiable(sheena)\nGone(mose) -> Sporting(mose)\nforall x (Resolvable(x) -> Sporting(x))\nforall x (Chuffed(x) -> Additional(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) and not Lousy(x) -> Additional(x))\nforall x (Additional(x) -> Gone(x))\nResolvable(rosemary) and not Additional(rosemary) -> Pitiable(rosemary)\n\nnot Sporting(mose)\n\nChuffed(mose) and forall x (Chuffed(x) -> Additional(x)) -> therefore Additional(mose) Additional(mose) and forall x (Additional(x) -> Gone(x)) -> therefore Gone(mose) Gone(mose) and Gone(mose) -> Sporting(mose) -> therefore Sporting(mose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Laurene is deciduous. Conroy is inst. Sebastien is not xenophobic. Dunc is gradual. If Conroy is deciduous then Conroy is oozy. If someone is xenophobic then they are oozy. If someone is inst then they are fungoid. If someone is deciduous and not partizan then they are fungoid. Kind people are deciduous. If Laurene is xenophobic and Laurene is not fungoid then Laurene is gradual. Laurene is not oozy.", "logic": "\nDeciduous(laurene)\nInst(conroy)\nnot Xenophobic(sebastien)\nGradual(dunc)\nDeciduous(conroy) -> Oozy(conroy)\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) -> Oozy(x))\nforall x (Inst(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Deciduous(x) and not Partizan(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nXenophobic(laurene) and not Fungoid(laurene) -> Gradual(laurene)\n\nnot Oozy(laurene)\n\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) -> Oozy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Anya is villainous. Godwin is rancorous. Wynn is not unjust. Dale is subaquatic. If Godwin is villainous then Godwin is lossy. If someone is unjust then they are lossy. If someone is rancorous then they are pawky. If someone is villainous and not wordy then they are pawky. Kind people are villainous. If Anya is unjust and Anya is not pawky then Anya is subaquatic. Dale is villainous.", "logic": "\nVillainous(anya)\nRancorous(godwin)\nnot Unjust(wynn)\nSubaquatic(dale)\nVillainous(godwin) -> Lossy(godwin)\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Lossy(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) -> Pawky(x))\nforall x (Villainous(x) and not Wordy(x) -> Pawky(x))\nforall x (Pawky(x) -> Villainous(x))\nUnjust(anya) and not Pawky(anya) -> Subaquatic(anya)\n\nVillainous(dale)\n\nforall x (Pawky(x) -> Villainous(x)) <- forall x (Rancorous(x) -> Pawky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Lemmie is strident. Anabelle is electoral. Cher is not dissolved. Isobel is breakneck. If Anabelle is strident then Anabelle is sulphuric. If someone is dissolved then they are sulphuric. If someone is electoral then they are unloving. If someone is strident and not variolic then they are unloving. Kind people are strident. If Lemmie is dissolved and Lemmie is not unloving then Lemmie is breakneck. Cher is not strident.", "logic": "\nStrident(lemmie)\nElectoral(anabelle)\nnot Dissolved(cher)\nBreakneck(isobel)\nStrident(anabelle) -> Sulphuric(anabelle)\nforall x (Dissolved(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Electoral(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) and not Variolic(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Strident(x))\nDissolved(lemmie) and not Unloving(lemmie) -> Breakneck(lemmie)\n\nnot Strident(cher)\n\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Strident(x)) <- forall x (Electoral(x) -> Unloving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Donn is cracking. Ethan is nonhairy. Marchall is not necklike. Dunc is unexciting. If Ethan is cracking then Ethan is bookable. If someone is necklike then they are bookable. If someone is nonhairy then they are torulose. If someone is cracking and not aoristic then they are torulose. Kind people are cracking. If Donn is necklike and Donn is not torulose then Donn is unexciting. Marchall is torulose.", "logic": "\nCracking(donn)\nNonhairy(ethan)\nnot Necklike(marchall)\nUnexciting(dunc)\nCracking(ethan) -> Bookable(ethan)\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Bookable(x))\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Cracking(x) and not Aoristic(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Torulose(x) -> Cracking(x))\nNecklike(donn) and not Torulose(donn) -> Unexciting(donn)\n\nTorulose(marchall)\n\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Torulose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Vassily is justified. Irena is chichi. Vanna is not credal. Deanna is stomatous. If Irena is justified then Irena is bracted. If someone is credal then they are bracted. If someone is chichi then they are dyspnoeic. If someone is justified and not colonized then they are dyspnoeic. Kind people are justified. If Vassily is credal and Vassily is not dyspnoeic then Vassily is stomatous. Vassily is not credal.", "logic": "\nJustified(vassily)\nChichi(irena)\nnot Credal(vanna)\nStomatous(deanna)\nJustified(irena) -> Bracted(irena)\nforall x (Credal(x) -> Bracted(x))\nforall x (Chichi(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Justified(x) and not Colonized(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> Justified(x))\nCredal(vassily) and not Dyspnoeic(vassily) -> Stomatous(vassily)\n\nnot Credal(vassily)\n\nnot Credal(vassily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Arlyn is imbecile. Ardeen is walleyed. Tedrick is not sinuate. Graeme is guatemalan. If Ardeen is imbecile then Ardeen is huffy. If someone is sinuate then they are huffy. If someone is walleyed then they are ovine. If someone is imbecile and not undying then they are ovine. Kind people are imbecile. If Arlyn is sinuate and Arlyn is not ovine then Arlyn is guatemalan. Graeme is undying.", "logic": "\nImbecile(arlyn)\nWalleyed(ardeen)\nnot Sinuate(tedrick)\nGuatemalan(graeme)\nImbecile(ardeen) -> Huffy(ardeen)\nforall x (Sinuate(x) -> Huffy(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Imbecile(x) and not Undying(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> Imbecile(x))\nSinuate(arlyn) and not Ovine(arlyn) -> Guatemalan(arlyn)\n\nUndying(graeme)\n\nUndying(graeme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Orelee is corrected. Esmeralda is datable. Effie is not satyric. Judd is blebby. If Esmeralda is corrected then Esmeralda is musty. If someone is satyric then they are musty. If someone is datable then they are stringent. If someone is corrected and not traveled then they are stringent. Kind people are corrected. If Orelee is satyric and Orelee is not stringent then Orelee is blebby. Orelee is not datable.", "logic": "\nCorrected(orelee)\nDatable(esmeralda)\nnot Satyric(effie)\nBlebby(judd)\nCorrected(esmeralda) -> Musty(esmeralda)\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Musty(x))\nforall x (Datable(x) -> Stringent(x))\nforall x (Corrected(x) and not Traveled(x) -> Stringent(x))\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Corrected(x))\nSatyric(orelee) and not Stringent(orelee) -> Blebby(orelee)\n\nnot Datable(orelee)\n\nnot Datable(orelee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Alvina is epicarpal. Moyra is unrefined. Maxi is not jade. Bryna is conductive. If Moyra is epicarpal then Moyra is protrusile. If someone is jade then they are protrusile. If someone is unrefined then they are barricaded. If someone is epicarpal and not autolytic then they are barricaded. Kind people are epicarpal. If Alvina is jade and Alvina is not barricaded then Alvina is conductive. Maxi is unrefined.", "logic": "\nEpicarpal(alvina)\nUnrefined(moyra)\nnot Jade(maxi)\nConductive(bryna)\nEpicarpal(moyra) -> Protrusile(moyra)\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Unrefined(x) -> Barricaded(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) and not Autolytic(x) -> Barricaded(x))\nforall x (Barricaded(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\nJade(alvina) and not Barricaded(alvina) -> Conductive(alvina)\n\nUnrefined(maxi)\n\nUnrefined(maxi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Katheleen is bouncy. Rochelle is amoeboid. Tatiana is not genotypic. If someone is amoeboid and strict then they are bouncy. Cold people are bouncy. If Rochelle is bouncy then Rochelle is not strict. If someone is focal then they are gilled. If Rochelle is not strict then Rochelle is gilled. If someone is gilled then they are focal. Katheleen is bouncy.", "logic": "\nBouncy(katheleen)\nAmoeboid(rochelle)\nnot Genotypic(tatiana)\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) and Strict(x) -> Bouncy(x))\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Bouncy(x))\nBouncy(rochelle) -> not Strict(rochelle)\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Gilled(x))\nnot Strict(rochelle) -> Gilled(rochelle)\nforall x (Gilled(x) -> Focal(x))\n\nBouncy(katheleen)\n\ntherefore Bouncy(katheleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Sheldon is bustling. Emmett is movable. Nara is not windward. If someone is movable and applied then they are bustling. Cold people are bustling. If Emmett is bustling then Emmett is not applied. If someone is whirring then they are nauseated. If Emmett is not applied then Emmett is nauseated. If someone is nauseated then they are whirring. Nara is windward.", "logic": "\nBustling(sheldon)\nMovable(emmett)\nnot Windward(nara)\nforall x (Movable(x) and Applied(x) -> Bustling(x))\nforall x (Movable(x) -> Bustling(x))\nBustling(emmett) -> not Applied(emmett)\nforall x (Whirring(x) -> Nauseated(x))\nnot Applied(emmett) -> Nauseated(emmett)\nforall x (Nauseated(x) -> Whirring(x))\n\nWindward(nara)\n\ntherefore not Windward(nara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Eileen is moralistic. Sergeant is wrought. Elsie is not carved. If someone is wrought and cooked then they are moralistic. Cold people are moralistic. If Sergeant is moralistic then Sergeant is not cooked. If someone is trained then they are endogamic. If Sergeant is not cooked then Sergeant is endogamic. If someone is endogamic then they are trained. Sergeant is moralistic.", "logic": "\nMoralistic(eileen)\nWrought(sergeant)\nnot Carved(elsie)\nforall x (Wrought(x) and Cooked(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nMoralistic(sergeant) -> not Cooked(sergeant)\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Endogamic(x))\nnot Cooked(sergeant) -> Endogamic(sergeant)\nforall x (Endogamic(x) -> Trained(x))\n\nMoralistic(sergeant)\n\nWrought(sergeant) and forall x (Wrought(x) -> Moralistic(x)) -> therefore Moralistic(sergeant)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Shaylah is imbecilic. Robinetta is turkish. Hunter is not loved. If someone is turkish and hysterical then they are imbecilic. Cold people are imbecilic. If Robinetta is imbecilic then Robinetta is not hysterical. If someone is crowded then they are blueish. If Robinetta is not hysterical then Robinetta is blueish. If someone is blueish then they are crowded. Robinetta is not imbecilic.", "logic": "\nImbecilic(shaylah)\nTurkish(robinetta)\nnot Loved(hunter)\nforall x (Turkish(x) and Hysterical(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Turkish(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nImbecilic(robinetta) -> not Hysterical(robinetta)\nforall x (Crowded(x) -> Blueish(x))\nnot Hysterical(robinetta) -> Blueish(robinetta)\nforall x (Blueish(x) -> Crowded(x))\n\nnot Imbecilic(robinetta)\n\nTurkish(robinetta) and forall x (Turkish(x) -> Imbecilic(x)) -> therefore Imbecilic(robinetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Hilliard is craven. Elisabeth is monatomic. Jana is not sorbed. If someone is monatomic and flaunty then they are craven. Cold people are craven. If Elisabeth is craven then Elisabeth is not flaunty. If someone is billion then they are bionomic. If Elisabeth is not flaunty then Elisabeth is bionomic. If someone is bionomic then they are billion. Elisabeth is not flaunty.", "logic": "\nCraven(hilliard)\nMonatomic(elisabeth)\nnot Sorbed(jana)\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Flaunty(x) -> Craven(x))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) -> Craven(x))\nCraven(elisabeth) -> not Flaunty(elisabeth)\nforall x (Billion(x) -> Bionomic(x))\nnot Flaunty(elisabeth) -> Bionomic(elisabeth)\nforall x (Bionomic(x) -> Billion(x))\n\nnot Flaunty(elisabeth)\n\nMonatomic(elisabeth) and forall x (Monatomic(x) -> Craven(x)) -> therefore Craven(elisabeth) Craven(elisabeth) and Craven(elisabeth) -> not Flaunty(elisabeth) -> therefore not Flaunty(elisabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Roby is culinary. Danny is bicolored. Claudia is not digital. If someone is bicolored and motley then they are culinary. Cold people are culinary. If Danny is culinary then Danny is not motley. If someone is unfathomed then they are pyogenic. If Danny is not motley then Danny is pyogenic. If someone is pyogenic then they are unfathomed. Danny is motley.", "logic": "\nCulinary(roby)\nBicolored(danny)\nnot Digital(claudia)\nforall x (Bicolored(x) and Motley(x) -> Culinary(x))\nforall x (Bicolored(x) -> Culinary(x))\nCulinary(danny) -> not Motley(danny)\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nnot Motley(danny) -> Pyogenic(danny)\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) -> Unfathomed(x))\n\nMotley(danny)\n\nBicolored(danny) and forall x (Bicolored(x) -> Culinary(x)) -> therefore Culinary(danny) Culinary(danny) and Culinary(danny) -> not Motley(danny) -> therefore not Motley(danny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Agamemnon is esthetical. Wyatt is afghan. Hollis is not postexilic. If someone is afghan and unturned then they are esthetical. Cold people are esthetical. If Wyatt is esthetical then Wyatt is not unturned. If someone is pinkish then they are embolic. If Wyatt is not unturned then Wyatt is embolic. If someone is embolic then they are pinkish. Wyatt is embolic.", "logic": "\nEsthetical(agamemnon)\nAfghan(wyatt)\nnot Postexilic(hollis)\nforall x (Afghan(x) and Unturned(x) -> Esthetical(x))\nforall x (Afghan(x) -> Esthetical(x))\nEsthetical(wyatt) -> not Unturned(wyatt)\nforall x (Pinkish(x) -> Embolic(x))\nnot Unturned(wyatt) -> Embolic(wyatt)\nforall x (Embolic(x) -> Pinkish(x))\n\nEmbolic(wyatt)\n\nAfghan(wyatt) and forall x (Afghan(x) -> Esthetical(x)) -> therefore Esthetical(wyatt) Esthetical(wyatt) and Esthetical(wyatt) -> not Unturned(wyatt) -> therefore not Unturned(wyatt) not Unturned(wyatt) and not Unturned(wyatt) -> Embolic(wyatt) -> therefore Embolic(wyatt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Tyson is insurable. Bobette is ecumenical. Regine is not gradual. If someone is ecumenical and isentropic then they are insurable. Cold people are insurable. If Bobette is insurable then Bobette is not isentropic. If someone is dapper then they are unrealized. If Bobette is not isentropic then Bobette is unrealized. If someone is unrealized then they are dapper. Bobette is not unrealized.", "logic": "\nInsurable(tyson)\nEcumenical(bobette)\nnot Gradual(regine)\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) and Isentropic(x) -> Insurable(x))\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) -> Insurable(x))\nInsurable(bobette) -> not Isentropic(bobette)\nforall x (Dapper(x) -> Unrealized(x))\nnot Isentropic(bobette) -> Unrealized(bobette)\nforall x (Unrealized(x) -> Dapper(x))\n\nnot Unrealized(bobette)\n\nEcumenical(bobette) and forall x (Ecumenical(x) -> Insurable(x)) -> therefore Insurable(bobette) Insurable(bobette) and Insurable(bobette) -> not Isentropic(bobette) -> therefore not Isentropic(bobette) not Isentropic(bobette) and not Isentropic(bobette) -> Unrealized(bobette) -> therefore Unrealized(bobette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Ford is appareled. Arabele is gritty. Lazarus is not unscalable. If someone is gritty and clathrate then they are appareled. Cold people are appareled. If Arabele is appareled then Arabele is not clathrate. If someone is allotted then they are unproven. If Arabele is not clathrate then Arabele is unproven. If someone is unproven then they are allotted. Ford is not allotted.", "logic": "\nAppareled(ford)\nGritty(arabele)\nnot Unscalable(lazarus)\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Clathrate(x) -> Appareled(x))\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Appareled(x))\nAppareled(arabele) -> not Clathrate(arabele)\nforall x (Allotted(x) -> Unproven(x))\nnot Clathrate(arabele) -> Unproven(arabele)\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Allotted(x))\n\nnot Allotted(ford)\n\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Allotted(x)) <- forall x (Allotted(x) -> Unproven(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Wayland is bronzy. Trescha is apogamic. Lezlie is not guiding. If someone is apogamic and genuine then they are bronzy. Cold people are bronzy. If Trescha is bronzy then Trescha is not genuine. If someone is clothed then they are xxvii. If Trescha is not genuine then Trescha is xxvii. If someone is xxvii then they are clothed. Lezlie is clothed.", "logic": "\nBronzy(wayland)\nApogamic(trescha)\nnot Guiding(lezlie)\nforall x (Apogamic(x) and Genuine(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nforall x (Apogamic(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nBronzy(trescha) -> not Genuine(trescha)\nforall x (Clothed(x) -> Xxvii(x))\nnot Genuine(trescha) -> Xxvii(trescha)\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> Clothed(x))\n\nClothed(lezlie)\n\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> Clothed(x)) <- forall x (Clothed(x) -> Xxvii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Idette is starkers. Brandise is lateen. Toddie is not chaetal. If someone is lateen and felonious then they are starkers. Cold people are starkers. If Brandise is starkers then Brandise is not felonious. If someone is astringent then they are euphoriant. If Brandise is not felonious then Brandise is euphoriant. If someone is euphoriant then they are astringent. Idette is not euphoriant.", "logic": "\nStarkers(idette)\nLateen(brandise)\nnot Chaetal(toddie)\nforall x (Lateen(x) and Felonious(x) -> Starkers(x))\nforall x (Lateen(x) -> Starkers(x))\nStarkers(brandise) -> not Felonious(brandise)\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> Euphoriant(x))\nnot Felonious(brandise) -> Euphoriant(brandise)\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) -> Astringent(x))\n\nnot Euphoriant(idette)\n\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> Euphoriant(x)) <- forall x (Euphoriant(x) -> Astringent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Jolene is nicaraguan. Tucker is booted. Gizela is not arteriolar. If someone is booted and charged then they are nicaraguan. Cold people are nicaraguan. If Tucker is nicaraguan then Tucker is not charged. If someone is sniffy then they are durable. If Tucker is not charged then Tucker is durable. If someone is durable then they are sniffy. Gizela is nicaraguan.", "logic": "\nNicaraguan(jolene)\nBooted(tucker)\nnot Arteriolar(gizela)\nforall x (Booted(x) and Charged(x) -> Nicaraguan(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) -> Nicaraguan(x))\nNicaraguan(tucker) -> not Charged(tucker)\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Durable(x))\nnot Charged(tucker) -> Durable(tucker)\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Sniffy(x))\n\nNicaraguan(gizela)\n\nforall x (Booted(x) and Charged(x) -> Nicaraguan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Hiralal is humified. Suellen is suctorial. Staffard is not freshman. If someone is suctorial and superior then they are humified. Cold people are humified. If Suellen is humified then Suellen is not superior. If someone is continent then they are unbordered. If Suellen is not superior then Suellen is unbordered. If someone is unbordered then they are continent. Hiralal is not red.", "logic": "\nHumified(hiralal)\nSuctorial(suellen)\nnot Freshman(staffard)\nforall x (Suctorial(x) and Superior(x) -> Humified(x))\nforall x (Suctorial(x) -> Humified(x))\nHumified(suellen) -> not Superior(suellen)\nforall x (Continent(x) -> Unbordered(x))\nnot Superior(suellen) -> Unbordered(suellen)\nforall x (Unbordered(x) -> Continent(x))\n\nnot Red(hiralal)\n\nnot Red(hiralal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Corey is lowborn. Bobbie is taiwanese. Luelle is not smoothed. If someone is taiwanese and scottish then they are lowborn. Cold people are lowborn. If Bobbie is lowborn then Bobbie is not scottish. If someone is widespread then they are stellate. If Bobbie is not scottish then Bobbie is stellate. If someone is stellate then they are widespread. Bobbie is smoothed.", "logic": "\nLowborn(corey)\nTaiwanese(bobbie)\nnot Smoothed(luelle)\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) and Scottish(x) -> Lowborn(x))\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) -> Lowborn(x))\nLowborn(bobbie) -> not Scottish(bobbie)\nforall x (Widespread(x) -> Stellate(x))\nnot Scottish(bobbie) -> Stellate(bobbie)\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Widespread(x))\n\nSmoothed(bobbie)\n\nSmoothed(bobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Althea is avuncular. Roxine is confusable. Pepito is not swedish. If someone is confusable and glamourous then they are avuncular. Cold people are avuncular. If Roxine is avuncular then Roxine is not glamourous. If someone is scratchy then they are untanned. If Roxine is not glamourous then Roxine is untanned. If someone is untanned then they are scratchy. Pepito is not confusable.", "logic": "\nAvuncular(althea)\nConfusable(roxine)\nnot Swedish(pepito)\nforall x (Confusable(x) and Glamourous(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Confusable(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nAvuncular(roxine) -> not Glamourous(roxine)\nforall x (Scratchy(x) -> Untanned(x))\nnot Glamourous(roxine) -> Untanned(roxine)\nforall x (Untanned(x) -> Scratchy(x))\n\nnot Confusable(pepito)\n\nnot Confusable(pepito) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Malissa is jingoistic. Dayle is turbulent. Lara is not instinct. If someone is turbulent and univalent then they are jingoistic. Cold people are jingoistic. If Dayle is jingoistic then Dayle is not univalent. If someone is unspoken then they are underclass. If Dayle is not univalent then Dayle is underclass. If someone is underclass then they are unspoken. Malissa is univalent.", "logic": "\nJingoistic(malissa)\nTurbulent(dayle)\nnot Instinct(lara)\nforall x (Turbulent(x) and Univalent(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nforall x (Turbulent(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nJingoistic(dayle) -> not Univalent(dayle)\nforall x (Unspoken(x) -> Underclass(x))\nnot Univalent(dayle) -> Underclass(dayle)\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Unspoken(x))\n\nUnivalent(malissa)\n\nUnivalent(malissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Livia is brunet. Mart is alopecic. Mart is brunet. Ahmad is puppylike. Ahmad is benignant. Ahmad is wobbly. Kit is brunet. Kit is puppylike. Kit is benignant. Kit is wobbly. All puppylike, brunet things are alopecic. If Livia is brunet then Livia is puppylike. If Livia is puppylike and Livia is alopecic then Livia is benignant. If Ahmad is benignant and Ahmad is wobbly then Ahmad is planar. All puppylike things are planar. Furry, planar things are wobbly. Mart is brunet.", "logic": "\nBrunet(livia)\nAlopecic(mart)\nBrunet(mart)\nPuppylike(ahmad)\nBenignant(ahmad)\nWobbly(ahmad)\nBrunet(kit)\nPuppylike(kit)\nBenignant(kit)\nWobbly(kit)\nforall x (Puppylike(x) and Brunet(x) -> Alopecic(x))\nBrunet(livia) -> Puppylike(livia)\nPuppylike(livia) and Alopecic(livia) -> Benignant(livia)\nBenignant(ahmad) and Wobbly(ahmad) -> Planar(ahmad)\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> Planar(x))\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and Planar(x) -> Wobbly(x))\n\nBrunet(mart)\n\ntherefore Brunet(mart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Oralia is jazzy. Isador is purulent. Isador is jazzy. Karyl is concurrent. Karyl is frail. Karyl is ominous. Neile is jazzy. Neile is concurrent. Neile is frail. Neile is ominous. All concurrent, jazzy things are purulent. If Oralia is jazzy then Oralia is concurrent. If Oralia is concurrent and Oralia is purulent then Oralia is frail. If Karyl is frail and Karyl is ominous then Karyl is revived. All concurrent things are revived. Furry, revived things are ominous. Neile is not frail.", "logic": "\nJazzy(oralia)\nPurulent(isador)\nJazzy(isador)\nConcurrent(karyl)\nFrail(karyl)\nOminous(karyl)\nJazzy(neile)\nConcurrent(neile)\nFrail(neile)\nOminous(neile)\nforall x (Concurrent(x) and Jazzy(x) -> Purulent(x))\nJazzy(oralia) -> Concurrent(oralia)\nConcurrent(oralia) and Purulent(oralia) -> Frail(oralia)\nFrail(karyl) and Ominous(karyl) -> Revived(karyl)\nforall x (Concurrent(x) -> Revived(x))\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Revived(x) -> Ominous(x))\n\nnot Frail(neile)\n\ntherefore Frail(neile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Starlin is lingual. Rosalinda is hated. Rosalinda is lingual. Marris is exogenic. Marris is foetid. Marris is enabling. Ambrose is lingual. Ambrose is exogenic. Ambrose is foetid. Ambrose is enabling. All exogenic, lingual things are hated. If Starlin is lingual then Starlin is exogenic. If Starlin is exogenic and Starlin is hated then Starlin is foetid. If Marris is foetid and Marris is enabling then Marris is curable. All exogenic things are curable. Furry, curable things are enabling. Ambrose is hated.", "logic": "\nLingual(starlin)\nHated(rosalinda)\nLingual(rosalinda)\nExogenic(marris)\nFoetid(marris)\nEnabling(marris)\nLingual(ambrose)\nExogenic(ambrose)\nFoetid(ambrose)\nEnabling(ambrose)\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Lingual(x) -> Hated(x))\nLingual(starlin) -> Exogenic(starlin)\nExogenic(starlin) and Hated(starlin) -> Foetid(starlin)\nFoetid(marris) and Enabling(marris) -> Curable(marris)\nforall x (Exogenic(x) -> Curable(x))\nforall x (Hated(x) and Curable(x) -> Enabling(x))\n\nHated(ambrose)\n\nExogenic(ambrose) and Lingual(ambrose) and forall x (Exogenic(x) and Lingual(x) -> Hated(x)) -> therefore Hated(ambrose)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Tove is cationic. Marko is twelfth. Marko is cationic. Fannie is amoeboid. Fannie is pituitary. Fannie is seeable. Thad is cationic. Thad is amoeboid. Thad is pituitary. Thad is seeable. All amoeboid, cationic things are twelfth. If Tove is cationic then Tove is amoeboid. If Tove is amoeboid and Tove is twelfth then Tove is pituitary. If Fannie is pituitary and Fannie is seeable then Fannie is salubrious. All amoeboid things are salubrious. Furry, salubrious things are seeable. Fannie is not salubrious.", "logic": "\nCationic(tove)\nTwelfth(marko)\nCationic(marko)\nAmoeboid(fannie)\nPituitary(fannie)\nSeeable(fannie)\nCationic(thad)\nAmoeboid(thad)\nPituitary(thad)\nSeeable(thad)\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) and Cationic(x) -> Twelfth(x))\nCationic(tove) -> Amoeboid(tove)\nAmoeboid(tove) and Twelfth(tove) -> Pituitary(tove)\nPituitary(fannie) and Seeable(fannie) -> Salubrious(fannie)\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Salubrious(x))\nforall x (Twelfth(x) and Salubrious(x) -> Seeable(x))\n\nnot Salubrious(fannie)\n\nAmoeboid(fannie) and forall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Salubrious(x)) -> therefore Salubrious(fannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Hilarie is regulative. Kay is airborne. Kay is regulative. Durward is endocrine. Durward is working. Durward is opened. Darrick is regulative. Darrick is endocrine. Darrick is working. Darrick is opened. All endocrine, regulative things are airborne. If Hilarie is regulative then Hilarie is endocrine. If Hilarie is endocrine and Hilarie is airborne then Hilarie is working. If Durward is working and Durward is opened then Durward is foremost. All endocrine things are foremost. Furry, foremost things are opened. Hilarie is foremost.", "logic": "\nRegulative(hilarie)\nAirborne(kay)\nRegulative(kay)\nEndocrine(durward)\nWorking(durward)\nOpened(durward)\nRegulative(darrick)\nEndocrine(darrick)\nWorking(darrick)\nOpened(darrick)\nforall x (Endocrine(x) and Regulative(x) -> Airborne(x))\nRegulative(hilarie) -> Endocrine(hilarie)\nEndocrine(hilarie) and Airborne(hilarie) -> Working(hilarie)\nWorking(durward) and Opened(durward) -> Foremost(durward)\nforall x (Endocrine(x) -> Foremost(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) and Foremost(x) -> Opened(x))\n\nForemost(hilarie)\n\nRegulative(hilarie) and Regulative(hilarie) -> Endocrine(hilarie) -> therefore Endocrine(hilarie) Endocrine(hilarie) and forall x (Endocrine(x) -> Foremost(x)) -> therefore Foremost(hilarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Titos is archaistic. Carita is reborn. Carita is archaistic. Lenard is bumpkinly. Lenard is unmanly. Lenard is connate. Atlanta is archaistic. Atlanta is bumpkinly. Atlanta is unmanly. Atlanta is connate. All bumpkinly, archaistic things are reborn. If Titos is archaistic then Titos is bumpkinly. If Titos is bumpkinly and Titos is reborn then Titos is unmanly. If Lenard is unmanly and Lenard is connate then Lenard is flamboyant. All bumpkinly things are flamboyant. Furry, flamboyant things are connate. Titos is not reborn.", "logic": "\nArchaistic(titos)\nReborn(carita)\nArchaistic(carita)\nBumpkinly(lenard)\nUnmanly(lenard)\nConnate(lenard)\nArchaistic(atlanta)\nBumpkinly(atlanta)\nUnmanly(atlanta)\nConnate(atlanta)\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Reborn(x))\nArchaistic(titos) -> Bumpkinly(titos)\nBumpkinly(titos) and Reborn(titos) -> Unmanly(titos)\nUnmanly(lenard) and Connate(lenard) -> Flamboyant(lenard)\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) and Flamboyant(x) -> Connate(x))\n\nnot Reborn(titos)\n\nArchaistic(titos) and Archaistic(titos) -> Bumpkinly(titos) -> therefore Bumpkinly(titos) Bumpkinly(titos) and Archaistic(titos) and forall x (Bumpkinly(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Reborn(x)) -> therefore Reborn(titos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Sofia is bony. Ulberto is unrhythmic. Ulberto is bony. Britni is petite. Britni is colonnaded. Britni is better. Annelise is bony. Annelise is petite. Annelise is colonnaded. Annelise is better. All petite, bony things are unrhythmic. If Sofia is bony then Sofia is petite. If Sofia is petite and Sofia is unrhythmic then Sofia is colonnaded. If Britni is colonnaded and Britni is better then Britni is coloured. All petite things are coloured. Furry, coloured things are better. Sofia is better.", "logic": "\nBony(sofia)\nUnrhythmic(ulberto)\nBony(ulberto)\nPetite(britni)\nColonnaded(britni)\nBetter(britni)\nBony(annelise)\nPetite(annelise)\nColonnaded(annelise)\nBetter(annelise)\nforall x (Petite(x) and Bony(x) -> Unrhythmic(x))\nBony(sofia) -> Petite(sofia)\nPetite(sofia) and Unrhythmic(sofia) -> Colonnaded(sofia)\nColonnaded(britni) and Better(britni) -> Coloured(britni)\nforall x (Petite(x) -> Coloured(x))\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) and Coloured(x) -> Better(x))\n\nBetter(sofia)\n\nBony(sofia) and Bony(sofia) -> Petite(sofia) -> therefore Petite(sofia) Petite(sofia) and Bony(sofia) and forall x (Petite(x) and Bony(x) -> Unrhythmic(x)) -> therefore Unrhythmic(sofia) Bony(sofia) and Bony(sofia) -> Petite(sofia) -> therefore Petite(sofia) Petite(sofia) and forall x (Petite(x) -> Coloured(x)) -> therefore Coloured(sofia) Unrhythmic(sofia) and Coloured(sofia) and forall x (Unrhythmic(x) and Coloured(x) -> Better(x)) -> therefore Better(sofia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Prent is exemplary. Lorrie is botanical. Lorrie is exemplary. Derek is midget. Derek is yankee. Derek is motherlike. Kiri is exemplary. Kiri is midget. Kiri is yankee. Kiri is motherlike. All midget, exemplary things are botanical. If Prent is exemplary then Prent is midget. If Prent is midget and Prent is botanical then Prent is yankee. If Derek is yankee and Derek is motherlike then Derek is plumbic. All midget things are plumbic. Furry, plumbic things are motherlike. Prent is not yankee.", "logic": "\nExemplary(prent)\nBotanical(lorrie)\nExemplary(lorrie)\nMidget(derek)\nYankee(derek)\nMotherlike(derek)\nExemplary(kiri)\nMidget(kiri)\nYankee(kiri)\nMotherlike(kiri)\nforall x (Midget(x) and Exemplary(x) -> Botanical(x))\nExemplary(prent) -> Midget(prent)\nMidget(prent) and Botanical(prent) -> Yankee(prent)\nYankee(derek) and Motherlike(derek) -> Plumbic(derek)\nforall x (Midget(x) -> Plumbic(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) and Plumbic(x) -> Motherlike(x))\n\nnot Yankee(prent)\n\nExemplary(prent) and Exemplary(prent) -> Midget(prent) -> therefore Midget(prent) Exemplary(prent) and Exemplary(prent) -> Midget(prent) -> therefore Midget(prent) Midget(prent) and Exemplary(prent) and forall x (Midget(x) and Exemplary(x) -> Botanical(x)) -> therefore Botanical(prent) Midget(prent) and Botanical(prent) and Midget(prent) and Botanical(prent) -> Yankee(prent) -> therefore Yankee(prent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Rakel is auriculate. Gaynor is perfervid. Gaynor is auriculate. Stefanie is pliable. Stefanie is austere. Stefanie is expansile. Kourtney is auriculate. Kourtney is pliable. Kourtney is austere. Kourtney is expansile. All pliable, auriculate things are perfervid. If Rakel is auriculate then Rakel is pliable. If Rakel is pliable and Rakel is perfervid then Rakel is austere. If Stefanie is austere and Stefanie is expansile then Stefanie is uncordial. All pliable things are uncordial. Furry, uncordial things are expansile. Gaynor is not expansile.", "logic": "\nAuriculate(rakel)\nPerfervid(gaynor)\nAuriculate(gaynor)\nPliable(stefanie)\nAustere(stefanie)\nExpansile(stefanie)\nAuriculate(kourtney)\nPliable(kourtney)\nAustere(kourtney)\nExpansile(kourtney)\nforall x (Pliable(x) and Auriculate(x) -> Perfervid(x))\nAuriculate(rakel) -> Pliable(rakel)\nPliable(rakel) and Perfervid(rakel) -> Austere(rakel)\nAustere(stefanie) and Expansile(stefanie) -> Uncordial(stefanie)\nforall x (Pliable(x) -> Uncordial(x))\nforall x (Perfervid(x) and Uncordial(x) -> Expansile(x))\n\nnot Expansile(gaynor)\n\nforall x (Perfervid(x) and Uncordial(x) -> Expansile(x)) <- forall x (Pliable(x) -> Uncordial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Eliott is disjunct. Bethany is laminar. Bethany is disjunct. Consuela is acanthotic. Consuela is siamese. Consuela is dexter. Wylie is disjunct. Wylie is acanthotic. Wylie is siamese. Wylie is dexter. All acanthotic, disjunct things are laminar. If Eliott is disjunct then Eliott is acanthotic. If Eliott is acanthotic and Eliott is laminar then Eliott is siamese. If Consuela is siamese and Consuela is dexter then Consuela is scrimy. All acanthotic things are scrimy. Furry, scrimy things are dexter. Bethany is scrimy.", "logic": "\nDisjunct(eliott)\nLaminar(bethany)\nDisjunct(bethany)\nAcanthotic(consuela)\nSiamese(consuela)\nDexter(consuela)\nDisjunct(wylie)\nAcanthotic(wylie)\nSiamese(wylie)\nDexter(wylie)\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) and Disjunct(x) -> Laminar(x))\nDisjunct(eliott) -> Acanthotic(eliott)\nAcanthotic(eliott) and Laminar(eliott) -> Siamese(eliott)\nSiamese(consuela) and Dexter(consuela) -> Scrimy(consuela)\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Laminar(x) and Scrimy(x) -> Dexter(x))\n\nScrimy(bethany)\n\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) -> Scrimy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Ammamaria is northern. Clerissa is broiled. Clerissa is northern. Lenore is manichee. Lenore is unshaved. Lenore is petalous. Aveline is northern. Aveline is manichee. Aveline is unshaved. Aveline is petalous. All manichee, northern things are broiled. If Ammamaria is northern then Ammamaria is manichee. If Ammamaria is manichee and Ammamaria is broiled then Ammamaria is unshaved. If Lenore is unshaved and Lenore is petalous then Lenore is ephemeral. All manichee things are ephemeral. Furry, ephemeral things are petalous. Lenore is not broiled.", "logic": "\nNorthern(ammamaria)\nBroiled(clerissa)\nNorthern(clerissa)\nManichee(lenore)\nUnshaved(lenore)\nPetalous(lenore)\nNorthern(aveline)\nManichee(aveline)\nUnshaved(aveline)\nPetalous(aveline)\nforall x (Manichee(x) and Northern(x) -> Broiled(x))\nNorthern(ammamaria) -> Manichee(ammamaria)\nManichee(ammamaria) and Broiled(ammamaria) -> Unshaved(ammamaria)\nUnshaved(lenore) and Petalous(lenore) -> Ephemeral(lenore)\nforall x (Manichee(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Broiled(x) and Ephemeral(x) -> Petalous(x))\n\nnot Broiled(lenore)\n\nforall x (Manichee(x) and Northern(x) -> Broiled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Fawn is mitigated. Uta is unportable. Uta is mitigated. Jody is spiderlike. Jody is risky. Jody is largish. Jackie is mitigated. Jackie is spiderlike. Jackie is risky. Jackie is largish. All spiderlike, mitigated things are unportable. If Fawn is mitigated then Fawn is spiderlike. If Fawn is spiderlike and Fawn is unportable then Fawn is risky. If Jody is risky and Jody is largish then Jody is vapourous. All spiderlike things are vapourous. Furry, vapourous things are largish. Jody is mitigated.", "logic": "\nMitigated(fawn)\nUnportable(uta)\nMitigated(uta)\nSpiderlike(jody)\nRisky(jody)\nLargish(jody)\nMitigated(jackie)\nSpiderlike(jackie)\nRisky(jackie)\nLargish(jackie)\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) and Mitigated(x) -> Unportable(x))\nMitigated(fawn) -> Spiderlike(fawn)\nSpiderlike(fawn) and Unportable(fawn) -> Risky(fawn)\nRisky(jody) and Largish(jody) -> Vapourous(jody)\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Unportable(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Largish(x))\n\nMitigated(jody)\n\nMitigated(jody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Morten is persian. Kelcy is woeful. Kelcy is persian. Fredra is empathetic. Fredra is oblate. Fredra is succinic. Alethea is persian. Alethea is empathetic. Alethea is oblate. Alethea is succinic. All empathetic, persian things are woeful. If Morten is persian then Morten is empathetic. If Morten is empathetic and Morten is woeful then Morten is oblate. If Fredra is oblate and Fredra is succinic then Fredra is inbound. All empathetic things are inbound. Furry, inbound things are succinic. Kelcy is not empathetic.", "logic": "\nPersian(morten)\nWoeful(kelcy)\nPersian(kelcy)\nEmpathetic(fredra)\nOblate(fredra)\nSuccinic(fredra)\nPersian(alethea)\nEmpathetic(alethea)\nOblate(alethea)\nSuccinic(alethea)\nforall x (Empathetic(x) and Persian(x) -> Woeful(x))\nPersian(morten) -> Empathetic(morten)\nEmpathetic(morten) and Woeful(morten) -> Oblate(morten)\nOblate(fredra) and Succinic(fredra) -> Inbound(fredra)\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Inbound(x))\nforall x (Woeful(x) and Inbound(x) -> Succinic(x))\n\nnot Empathetic(kelcy)\n\nnot Empathetic(kelcy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Mahmoud is cased. Flem is exonerated. Flem is cased. Purcell is based. Purcell is aspherical. Purcell is beloved. Janina is cased. Janina is based. Janina is aspherical. Janina is beloved. All based, cased things are exonerated. If Mahmoud is cased then Mahmoud is based. If Mahmoud is based and Mahmoud is exonerated then Mahmoud is aspherical. If Purcell is aspherical and Purcell is beloved then Purcell is amoebous. All based things are amoebous. Furry, amoebous things are beloved. Flem is blue.", "logic": "\nCased(mahmoud)\nExonerated(flem)\nCased(flem)\nBased(purcell)\nAspherical(purcell)\nBeloved(purcell)\nCased(janina)\nBased(janina)\nAspherical(janina)\nBeloved(janina)\nforall x (Based(x) and Cased(x) -> Exonerated(x))\nCased(mahmoud) -> Based(mahmoud)\nBased(mahmoud) and Exonerated(mahmoud) -> Aspherical(mahmoud)\nAspherical(purcell) and Beloved(purcell) -> Amoebous(purcell)\nforall x (Based(x) -> Amoebous(x))\nforall x (Exonerated(x) and Amoebous(x) -> Beloved(x))\n\nBlue(flem)\n\nBlue(flem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Skylar is veridical. Ariana is jaggy. Ariana is veridical. Gracie is runny. Gracie is telltale. Gracie is draped. Mame is veridical. Mame is runny. Mame is telltale. Mame is draped. All runny, veridical things are jaggy. If Skylar is veridical then Skylar is runny. If Skylar is runny and Skylar is jaggy then Skylar is telltale. If Gracie is telltale and Gracie is draped then Gracie is cropped. All runny things are cropped. Furry, cropped things are draped. Skylar is not blue.", "logic": "\nVeridical(skylar)\nJaggy(ariana)\nVeridical(ariana)\nRunny(gracie)\nTelltale(gracie)\nDraped(gracie)\nVeridical(mame)\nRunny(mame)\nTelltale(mame)\nDraped(mame)\nforall x (Runny(x) and Veridical(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nVeridical(skylar) -> Runny(skylar)\nRunny(skylar) and Jaggy(skylar) -> Telltale(skylar)\nTelltale(gracie) and Draped(gracie) -> Cropped(gracie)\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Jaggy(x) and Cropped(x) -> Draped(x))\n\nnot Blue(skylar)\n\nnot Blue(skylar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Ioana is ravening. Cyrill is swayback. Cyrill is ravening. Lynnelle is unfaithful. Lynnelle is torturous. Lynnelle is syncarpous. Adriana is ravening. Adriana is unfaithful. Adriana is torturous. Adriana is syncarpous. All unfaithful, ravening things are swayback. If Ioana is ravening then Ioana is unfaithful. If Ioana is unfaithful and Ioana is swayback then Ioana is torturous. If Lynnelle is torturous and Lynnelle is syncarpous then Lynnelle is felicitous. All unfaithful things are felicitous. Furry, felicitous things are syncarpous. Adriana is blue.", "logic": "\nRavening(ioana)\nSwayback(cyrill)\nRavening(cyrill)\nUnfaithful(lynnelle)\nTorturous(lynnelle)\nSyncarpous(lynnelle)\nRavening(adriana)\nUnfaithful(adriana)\nTorturous(adriana)\nSyncarpous(adriana)\nforall x (Unfaithful(x) and Ravening(x) -> Swayback(x))\nRavening(ioana) -> Unfaithful(ioana)\nUnfaithful(ioana) and Swayback(ioana) -> Torturous(ioana)\nTorturous(lynnelle) and Syncarpous(lynnelle) -> Felicitous(lynnelle)\nforall x (Unfaithful(x) -> Felicitous(x))\nforall x (Swayback(x) and Felicitous(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\n\nBlue(adriana)\n\nBlue(adriana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Vitoria is capsulate. Jonny is venose. Jonny is womanly. If something is unlabeled then it is not adulterine. If something is revolved and capsulate then it is adulterine. If Vitoria is not venose then Vitoria is adulterine. If something is womanly then it is sear. If something is revolved then it is unlabeled. All venose things are revolved. Vitoria is capsulate.", "logic": "\nCapsulate(vitoria)\nVenose(jonny)\nWomanly(jonny)\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) -> not Adulterine(x))\nforall x (Revolved(x) and Capsulate(x) -> Adulterine(x))\nnot Venose(vitoria) -> Adulterine(vitoria)\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Sear(x))\nforall x (Revolved(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Revolved(x))\n\nCapsulate(vitoria)\n\ntherefore Capsulate(vitoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Timmy is saxon. Roseanna is attacking. Roseanna is onstage. If something is bitter then it is not pokey. If something is inelastic and saxon then it is pokey. If Timmy is not attacking then Timmy is pokey. If something is onstage then it is unclaimed. If something is inelastic then it is bitter. All attacking things are inelastic. Roseanna is not attacking.", "logic": "\nSaxon(timmy)\nAttacking(roseanna)\nOnstage(roseanna)\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> not Pokey(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Saxon(x) -> Pokey(x))\nnot Attacking(timmy) -> Pokey(timmy)\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) -> Inelastic(x))\n\nnot Attacking(roseanna)\n\ntherefore Attacking(roseanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Kimberly is carbonyl. Anna is granulated. Anna is outsize. If something is arsenious then it is not wigless. If something is roast and carbonyl then it is wigless. If Kimberly is not granulated then Kimberly is wigless. If something is outsize then it is undirected. If something is roast then it is arsenious. All granulated things are roast. Anna is roast.", "logic": "\nCarbonyl(kimberly)\nGranulated(anna)\nOutsize(anna)\nforall x (Arsenious(x) -> not Wigless(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) and Carbonyl(x) -> Wigless(x))\nnot Granulated(kimberly) -> Wigless(kimberly)\nforall x (Outsize(x) -> Undirected(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) -> Arsenious(x))\nforall x (Granulated(x) -> Roast(x))\n\nRoast(anna)\n\nGranulated(anna) and forall x (Granulated(x) -> Roast(x)) -> therefore Roast(anna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Carlie is hominal. Veronika is lifeless. Veronika is owing. If something is connatural then it is not unimproved. If something is desirable and hominal then it is unimproved. If Carlie is not lifeless then Carlie is unimproved. If something is owing then it is effortless. If something is desirable then it is connatural. All lifeless things are desirable. Veronika is not effortless.", "logic": "\nHominal(carlie)\nLifeless(veronika)\nOwing(veronika)\nforall x (Connatural(x) -> not Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and Hominal(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nnot Lifeless(carlie) -> Unimproved(carlie)\nforall x (Owing(x) -> Effortless(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) -> Connatural(x))\nforall x (Lifeless(x) -> Desirable(x))\n\nnot Effortless(veronika)\n\nOwing(veronika) and forall x (Owing(x) -> Effortless(x)) -> therefore Effortless(veronika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Devi is indicatory. Trace is salient. Trace is annular. If something is unratable then it is not telephonic. If something is figural and indicatory then it is telephonic. If Devi is not salient then Devi is telephonic. If something is annular then it is compelling. If something is figural then it is unratable. All salient things are figural. Trace is unratable.", "logic": "\nIndicatory(devi)\nSalient(trace)\nAnnular(trace)\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> not Telephonic(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) and Indicatory(x) -> Telephonic(x))\nnot Salient(devi) -> Telephonic(devi)\nforall x (Annular(x) -> Compelling(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Unratable(x))\nforall x (Salient(x) -> Figural(x))\n\nUnratable(trace)\n\nSalient(trace) and forall x (Salient(x) -> Figural(x)) -> therefore Figural(trace) Figural(trace) and forall x (Figural(x) -> Unratable(x)) -> therefore Unratable(trace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Emilee is unemphatic. Timothee is syrupy. Timothee is optative. If something is cozy then it is not basilican. If something is adscript and unemphatic then it is basilican. If Emilee is not syrupy then Emilee is basilican. If something is optative then it is spinnable. If something is adscript then it is cozy. All syrupy things are adscript. Timothee is not cozy.", "logic": "\nUnemphatic(emilee)\nSyrupy(timothee)\nOptative(timothee)\nforall x (Cozy(x) -> not Basilican(x))\nforall x (Adscript(x) and Unemphatic(x) -> Basilican(x))\nnot Syrupy(emilee) -> Basilican(emilee)\nforall x (Optative(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Adscript(x) -> Cozy(x))\nforall x (Syrupy(x) -> Adscript(x))\n\nnot Cozy(timothee)\n\nSyrupy(timothee) and forall x (Syrupy(x) -> Adscript(x)) -> therefore Adscript(timothee) Adscript(timothee) and forall x (Adscript(x) -> Cozy(x)) -> therefore Cozy(timothee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Staffard is deadlocked. Merola is anaerobic. Merola is minuscule. If something is tinned then it is not unmarred. If something is pycnotic and deadlocked then it is unmarred. If Staffard is not anaerobic then Staffard is unmarred. If something is minuscule then it is medieval. If something is pycnotic then it is tinned. All anaerobic things are pycnotic. Merola is not unmarred.", "logic": "\nDeadlocked(staffard)\nAnaerobic(merola)\nMinuscule(merola)\nforall x (Tinned(x) -> not Unmarred(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) and Deadlocked(x) -> Unmarred(x))\nnot Anaerobic(staffard) -> Unmarred(staffard)\nforall x (Minuscule(x) -> Medieval(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Pycnotic(x))\n\nnot Unmarred(merola)\n\nAnaerobic(merola) and forall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Pycnotic(x)) -> therefore Pycnotic(merola) Pycnotic(merola) and forall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Tinned(x)) -> therefore Tinned(merola) Tinned(merola) and forall x (Tinned(x) -> not Unmarred(x)) -> therefore not Unmarred(merola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Ronnie is grubby. Queada is hindu. Queada is batwing. If something is plumose then it is not diametric. If something is xxiii and grubby then it is diametric. If Ronnie is not hindu then Ronnie is diametric. If something is batwing then it is deafening. If something is xxiii then it is plumose. All hindu things are xxiii. Queada is diametric.", "logic": "\nGrubby(ronnie)\nHindu(queada)\nBatwing(queada)\nforall x (Plumose(x) -> not Diametric(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) and Grubby(x) -> Diametric(x))\nnot Hindu(ronnie) -> Diametric(ronnie)\nforall x (Batwing(x) -> Deafening(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) -> Plumose(x))\nforall x (Hindu(x) -> Xxiii(x))\n\nDiametric(queada)\n\nHindu(queada) and forall x (Hindu(x) -> Xxiii(x)) -> therefore Xxiii(queada) Xxiii(queada) and forall x (Xxiii(x) -> Plumose(x)) -> therefore Plumose(queada) Plumose(queada) and forall x (Plumose(x) -> not Diametric(x)) -> therefore not Diametric(queada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Kameko is ratable. Joice is visaged. Joice is horned. If something is untied then it is not dyspeptic. If something is noncaloric and ratable then it is dyspeptic. If Kameko is not visaged then Kameko is dyspeptic. If something is horned then it is meritable. If something is noncaloric then it is untied. All visaged things are noncaloric. Kameko is not noncaloric.", "logic": "\nRatable(kameko)\nVisaged(joice)\nHorned(joice)\nforall x (Untied(x) -> not Dyspeptic(x))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) and Ratable(x) -> Dyspeptic(x))\nnot Visaged(kameko) -> Dyspeptic(kameko)\nforall x (Horned(x) -> Meritable(x))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Untied(x))\nforall x (Visaged(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\n\nnot Noncaloric(kameko)\n\nforall x (Visaged(x) -> Noncaloric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Andri is resounding. Wilber is dragging. Wilber is vapourised. If something is cyclonical then it is not aloof. If something is undercover and resounding then it is aloof. If Andri is not dragging then Andri is aloof. If something is vapourised then it is swinish. If something is undercover then it is cyclonical. All dragging things are undercover. Andri is cyclonical.", "logic": "\nResounding(andri)\nDragging(wilber)\nVapourised(wilber)\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) -> not Aloof(x))\nforall x (Undercover(x) and Resounding(x) -> Aloof(x))\nnot Dragging(andri) -> Aloof(andri)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Undercover(x) -> Cyclonical(x))\nforall x (Dragging(x) -> Undercover(x))\n\nCyclonical(andri)\n\nforall x (Undercover(x) -> Cyclonical(x)) <- forall x (Dragging(x) -> Undercover(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Elicia is bilobed. Arabele is reported. Arabele is thwarting. If something is sunstruck then it is not commodious. If something is antinomian and bilobed then it is commodious. If Elicia is not reported then Elicia is commodious. If something is thwarting then it is cetacean. If something is antinomian then it is sunstruck. All reported things are antinomian. Elicia is not cetacean.", "logic": "\nBilobed(elicia)\nReported(arabele)\nThwarting(arabele)\nforall x (Sunstruck(x) -> not Commodious(x))\nforall x (Antinomian(x) and Bilobed(x) -> Commodious(x))\nnot Reported(elicia) -> Commodious(elicia)\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Cetacean(x))\nforall x (Antinomian(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Antinomian(x))\n\nnot Cetacean(elicia)\n\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Cetacean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Sharline is regressive. Natalina is controlled. Natalina is automated. If something is bridgeable then it is not argentous. If something is bimonthly and regressive then it is argentous. If Sharline is not controlled then Sharline is argentous. If something is automated then it is bibulous. If something is bimonthly then it is bridgeable. All controlled things are bimonthly. Sharline is argentous.", "logic": "\nRegressive(sharline)\nControlled(natalina)\nAutomated(natalina)\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> not Argentous(x))\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) and Regressive(x) -> Argentous(x))\nnot Controlled(sharline) -> Argentous(sharline)\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Bibulous(x))\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Controlled(x) -> Bimonthly(x))\n\nArgentous(sharline)\n\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) and Regressive(x) -> Argentous(x)) <- forall x (Controlled(x) -> Bimonthly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Helyn is tortured. Bertram is analogous. Bertram is incorrupt. If something is unbalanced then it is not pulseless. If something is syndetic and tortured then it is pulseless. If Helyn is not analogous then Helyn is pulseless. If something is incorrupt then it is homicidal. If something is syndetic then it is unbalanced. All analogous things are syndetic. Bertram is not tortured.", "logic": "\nTortured(helyn)\nAnalogous(bertram)\nIncorrupt(bertram)\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) -> not Pulseless(x))\nforall x (Syndetic(x) and Tortured(x) -> Pulseless(x))\nnot Analogous(helyn) -> Pulseless(helyn)\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Syndetic(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) -> Syndetic(x))\n\nnot Tortured(bertram)\n\nnot Tortured(bertram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Kori is papillose. Clarence is hypnogogic. Clarence is lenient. If something is prior then it is not loathly. If something is piggish and papillose then it is loathly. If Kori is not hypnogogic then Kori is loathly. If something is lenient then it is relocated. If something is piggish then it is prior. All hypnogogic things are piggish. Kori is hypnogogic.", "logic": "\nPapillose(kori)\nHypnogogic(clarence)\nLenient(clarence)\nforall x (Prior(x) -> not Loathly(x))\nforall x (Piggish(x) and Papillose(x) -> Loathly(x))\nnot Hypnogogic(kori) -> Loathly(kori)\nforall x (Lenient(x) -> Relocated(x))\nforall x (Piggish(x) -> Prior(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Piggish(x))\n\nHypnogogic(kori)\n\nHypnogogic(kori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "The wanda ambulate the chase. The wanda fodder the lia. The tyrus ambulate the lia. The lia is disjointed. The chase ambulate the wanda. The chase is zygomatic. The chase fodder the wanda. If someone fodder the lia then they are thrifty. If someone is disjointed then they need the lia. If someone subsist the lia then the lia fodder the tyrus. If someone subsist the chase then the chase is unsworn. If someone fodder the chase and the chase subsist the lia then the chase subsist the wanda. If someone subsist the tyrus then the tyrus is thrifty. If someone is thrifty then they eat the tyrus. If someone is unsworn and they need the chase then the chase subsist the wanda. The wanda ambulate the chase.", "logic": "\nAmbulate(wanda, chase)\nFodder(wanda, lia)\nAmbulate(tyrus, lia)\nDisjointed(lia)\nAmbulate(chase, wanda)\nZygomatic(chase)\nFodder(chase, wanda)\nforall x (Fodder(x, lia) -> Thrifty(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Fodder(x, lia))\nforall x (Subsist(x, lia) -> Fodder(lia, tyrus))\nforall x (Subsist(x, chase) -> Unsworn(chase))\nforall x (Fodder(x, chase) and Subsist(chase, lia) -> Subsist(chase, wanda))\nforall x (Subsist(x, tyrus) -> Thrifty(tyrus))\nforall x (Thrifty(x) -> Ambulate(x, tyrus))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) and Fodder(x, chase) -> Subsist(chase, wanda))\n\nAmbulate(wanda, chase)\n\ntherefore Ambulate(wanda, chase)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The binny clang the carolina. The binny silhouette the chevalier. The dirk clang the chevalier. The chevalier is callable. The carolina clang the binny. The carolina is apogamous. The carolina silhouette the binny. If someone silhouette the chevalier then they are outbred. If someone is callable then they need the chevalier. If someone outpace the chevalier then the chevalier silhouette the dirk. If someone outpace the carolina then the carolina is pappose. If someone silhouette the carolina and the carolina outpace the chevalier then the carolina outpace the binny. If someone outpace the dirk then the dirk is outbred. If someone is outbred then they eat the dirk. If someone is pappose and they need the carolina then the carolina outpace the binny. The carolina does not need the binny.", "logic": "\nClang(binny, carolina)\nSilhouette(binny, chevalier)\nClang(dirk, chevalier)\nCallable(chevalier)\nClang(carolina, binny)\nApogamous(carolina)\nSilhouette(carolina, binny)\nforall x (Silhouette(x, chevalier) -> Outbred(x))\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Silhouette(x, chevalier))\nforall x (Outpace(x, chevalier) -> Silhouette(chevalier, dirk))\nforall x (Outpace(x, carolina) -> Pappose(carolina))\nforall x (Silhouette(x, carolina) and Outpace(carolina, chevalier) -> Outpace(carolina, binny))\nforall x (Outpace(x, dirk) -> Outbred(dirk))\nforall x (Outbred(x) -> Clang(x, dirk))\nforall x (Pappose(x) and Silhouette(x, carolina) -> Outpace(carolina, binny))\n\nnot Silhouette(carolina, binny)\n\ntherefore Silhouette(carolina, binny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The marisa legislate the reggi. The marisa deliver the beatrice. The jaime legislate the beatrice. The beatrice is solicitous. The reggi legislate the marisa. The reggi is resettled. The reggi deliver the marisa. If someone deliver the beatrice then they are garish. If someone is solicitous then they need the beatrice. If someone bedhop the beatrice then the beatrice deliver the jaime. If someone bedhop the reggi then the reggi is allopathic. If someone deliver the reggi and the reggi bedhop the beatrice then the reggi bedhop the marisa. If someone bedhop the jaime then the jaime is garish. If someone is garish then they eat the jaime. If someone is allopathic and they need the reggi then the reggi bedhop the marisa. The marisa is garish.", "logic": "\nLegislate(marisa, reggi)\nDeliver(marisa, beatrice)\nLegislate(jaime, beatrice)\nSolicitous(beatrice)\nLegislate(reggi, marisa)\nResettled(reggi)\nDeliver(reggi, marisa)\nforall x (Deliver(x, beatrice) -> Garish(x))\nforall x (Solicitous(x) -> Deliver(x, beatrice))\nforall x (Bedhop(x, beatrice) -> Deliver(beatrice, jaime))\nforall x (Bedhop(x, reggi) -> Allopathic(reggi))\nforall x (Deliver(x, reggi) and Bedhop(reggi, beatrice) -> Bedhop(reggi, marisa))\nforall x (Bedhop(x, jaime) -> Garish(jaime))\nforall x (Garish(x) -> Legislate(x, jaime))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Deliver(x, reggi) -> Bedhop(reggi, marisa))\n\nGarish(marisa)\n\nDeliver(marisa, beatrice) and forall x (Deliver(x, beatrice) -> Garish(x)) -> therefore Garish(marisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The farica whelk the veronique. The farica exsiccate the caspar. The aaron whelk the caspar. The caspar is snuggled. The veronique whelk the farica. The veronique is vicious. The veronique exsiccate the farica. If someone exsiccate the caspar then they are diclinous. If someone is snuggled then they need the caspar. If someone embattle the caspar then the caspar exsiccate the aaron. If someone embattle the veronique then the veronique is sheetlike. If someone exsiccate the veronique and the veronique embattle the caspar then the veronique embattle the farica. If someone embattle the aaron then the aaron is diclinous. If someone is diclinous then they eat the aaron. If someone is sheetlike and they need the veronique then the veronique embattle the farica. The farica is not diclinous.", "logic": "\nWhelk(farica, veronique)\nExsiccate(farica, caspar)\nWhelk(aaron, caspar)\nSnuggled(caspar)\nWhelk(veronique, farica)\nVicious(veronique)\nExsiccate(veronique, farica)\nforall x (Exsiccate(x, caspar) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> Exsiccate(x, caspar))\nforall x (Embattle(x, caspar) -> Exsiccate(caspar, aaron))\nforall x (Embattle(x, veronique) -> Sheetlike(veronique))\nforall x (Exsiccate(x, veronique) and Embattle(veronique, caspar) -> Embattle(veronique, farica))\nforall x (Embattle(x, aaron) -> Diclinous(aaron))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) -> Whelk(x, aaron))\nforall x (Sheetlike(x) and Exsiccate(x, veronique) -> Embattle(veronique, farica))\n\nnot Diclinous(farica)\n\nExsiccate(farica, caspar) and forall x (Exsiccate(x, caspar) -> Diclinous(x)) -> therefore Diclinous(farica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The nola benficiate the dorri. The nola ennoble the ferdinand. The barbra benficiate the ferdinand. The ferdinand is setose. The dorri benficiate the nola. The dorri is serial. The dorri ennoble the nola. If someone ennoble the ferdinand then they are spiderlike. If someone is setose then they need the ferdinand. If someone candy the ferdinand then the ferdinand ennoble the barbra. If someone candy the dorri then the dorri is mercurous. If someone ennoble the dorri and the dorri candy the ferdinand then the dorri candy the nola. If someone candy the barbra then the barbra is spiderlike. If someone is spiderlike then they eat the barbra. If someone is mercurous and they need the dorri then the dorri candy the nola. The nola benficiate the barbra.", "logic": "\nBenficiate(nola, dorri)\nEnnoble(nola, ferdinand)\nBenficiate(barbra, ferdinand)\nSetose(ferdinand)\nBenficiate(dorri, nola)\nSerial(dorri)\nEnnoble(dorri, nola)\nforall x (Ennoble(x, ferdinand) -> Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Ennoble(x, ferdinand))\nforall x (Candy(x, ferdinand) -> Ennoble(ferdinand, barbra))\nforall x (Candy(x, dorri) -> Mercurous(dorri))\nforall x (Ennoble(x, dorri) and Candy(dorri, ferdinand) -> Candy(dorri, nola))\nforall x (Candy(x, barbra) -> Spiderlike(barbra))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Benficiate(x, barbra))\nforall x (Mercurous(x) and Ennoble(x, dorri) -> Candy(dorri, nola))\n\nBenficiate(nola, barbra)\n\nEnnoble(nola, ferdinand) and forall x (Ennoble(x, ferdinand) -> Spiderlike(x)) -> therefore Spiderlike(nola) Spiderlike(nola) and forall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Benficiate(x, barbra)) -> therefore Benficiate(nola, barbra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The demetrius caution the audry. The demetrius influence the sheree. The pierrette caution the sheree. The sheree is older. The audry caution the demetrius. The audry is spondaic. The audry influence the demetrius. If someone influence the sheree then they are koranic. If someone is older then they need the sheree. If someone boldface the sheree then the sheree influence the pierrette. If someone boldface the audry then the audry is inky. If someone influence the audry and the audry boldface the sheree then the audry boldface the demetrius. If someone boldface the pierrette then the pierrette is koranic. If someone is koranic then they eat the pierrette. If someone is inky and they need the audry then the audry boldface the demetrius. The sheree is not koranic.", "logic": "\nCaution(demetrius, audry)\nInfluence(demetrius, sheree)\nCaution(pierrette, sheree)\nOlder(sheree)\nCaution(audry, demetrius)\nSpondaic(audry)\nInfluence(audry, demetrius)\nforall x (Influence(x, sheree) -> Koranic(x))\nforall x (Older(x) -> Influence(x, sheree))\nforall x (Boldface(x, sheree) -> Influence(sheree, pierrette))\nforall x (Boldface(x, audry) -> Inky(audry))\nforall x (Influence(x, audry) and Boldface(audry, sheree) -> Boldface(audry, demetrius))\nforall x (Boldface(x, pierrette) -> Koranic(pierrette))\nforall x (Koranic(x) -> Caution(x, pierrette))\nforall x (Inky(x) and Influence(x, audry) -> Boldface(audry, demetrius))\n\nnot Koranic(sheree)\n\nOlder(sheree) and forall x (Older(x) -> Influence(x, sheree)) -> therefore Influence(sheree, sheree) Influence(sheree, sheree) and forall x (Influence(x, sheree) -> Koranic(x)) -> therefore Koranic(sheree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The andrei loan the durante. The andrei debar the sophronia. The dickie loan the sophronia. The sophronia is sibyllic. The durante loan the andrei. The durante is jailed. The durante debar the andrei. If someone debar the sophronia then they are misbranded. If someone is sibyllic then they need the sophronia. If someone camouflage the sophronia then the sophronia debar the dickie. If someone camouflage the durante then the durante is measured. If someone debar the durante and the durante camouflage the sophronia then the durante camouflage the andrei. If someone camouflage the dickie then the dickie is misbranded. If someone is misbranded then they eat the dickie. If someone is measured and they need the durante then the durante camouflage the andrei. The sophronia loan the dickie.", "logic": "\nLoan(andrei, durante)\nDebar(andrei, sophronia)\nLoan(dickie, sophronia)\nSibyllic(sophronia)\nLoan(durante, andrei)\nJailed(durante)\nDebar(durante, andrei)\nforall x (Debar(x, sophronia) -> Misbranded(x))\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) -> Debar(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, sophronia) -> Debar(sophronia, dickie))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, durante) -> Measured(durante))\nforall x (Debar(x, durante) and Camouflage(durante, sophronia) -> Camouflage(durante, andrei))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, dickie) -> Misbranded(dickie))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) -> Loan(x, dickie))\nforall x (Measured(x) and Debar(x, durante) -> Camouflage(durante, andrei))\n\nLoan(sophronia, dickie)\n\nSibyllic(sophronia) and forall x (Sibyllic(x) -> Debar(x, sophronia)) -> therefore Debar(sophronia, sophronia) Debar(sophronia, sophronia) and forall x (Debar(x, sophronia) -> Misbranded(x)) -> therefore Misbranded(sophronia) Misbranded(sophronia) and forall x (Misbranded(x) -> Loan(x, dickie)) -> therefore Loan(sophronia, dickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The cain quirk the felicity. The cain barbarize the guinevere. The hadrian quirk the guinevere. The guinevere is caesural. The felicity quirk the cain. The felicity is enervating. The felicity barbarize the cain. If someone barbarize the guinevere then they are belittling. If someone is caesural then they need the guinevere. If someone gestate the guinevere then the guinevere barbarize the hadrian. If someone gestate the felicity then the felicity is schismatic. If someone barbarize the felicity and the felicity gestate the guinevere then the felicity gestate the cain. If someone gestate the hadrian then the hadrian is belittling. If someone is belittling then they eat the hadrian. If someone is schismatic and they need the felicity then the felicity gestate the cain. The guinevere does not eat the hadrian.", "logic": "\nQuirk(cain, felicity)\nBarbarize(cain, guinevere)\nQuirk(hadrian, guinevere)\nCaesural(guinevere)\nQuirk(felicity, cain)\nEnervating(felicity)\nBarbarize(felicity, cain)\nforall x (Barbarize(x, guinevere) -> Belittling(x))\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Barbarize(x, guinevere))\nforall x (Gestate(x, guinevere) -> Barbarize(guinevere, hadrian))\nforall x (Gestate(x, felicity) -> Schismatic(felicity))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, felicity) and Gestate(felicity, guinevere) -> Gestate(felicity, cain))\nforall x (Gestate(x, hadrian) -> Belittling(hadrian))\nforall x (Belittling(x) -> Quirk(x, hadrian))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and Barbarize(x, felicity) -> Gestate(felicity, cain))\n\nnot Quirk(guinevere, hadrian)\n\nCaesural(guinevere) and forall x (Caesural(x) -> Barbarize(x, guinevere)) -> therefore Barbarize(guinevere, guinevere) Barbarize(guinevere, guinevere) and forall x (Barbarize(x, guinevere) -> Belittling(x)) -> therefore Belittling(guinevere) Belittling(guinevere) and forall x (Belittling(x) -> Quirk(x, hadrian)) -> therefore Quirk(guinevere, hadrian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The yardley marbleise the solly. The yardley inspissate the allianora. The theda marbleise the allianora. The allianora is clitoral. The solly marbleise the yardley. The solly is intimate. The solly inspissate the yardley. If someone inspissate the allianora then they are integrated. If someone is clitoral then they need the allianora. If someone skimp the allianora then the allianora inspissate the theda. If someone skimp the solly then the solly is frigorific. If someone inspissate the solly and the solly skimp the allianora then the solly skimp the yardley. If someone skimp the theda then the theda is integrated. If someone is integrated then they eat the theda. If someone is frigorific and they need the solly then the solly skimp the yardley. The theda is not integrated.", "logic": "\nMarbleise(yardley, solly)\nInspissate(yardley, allianora)\nMarbleise(theda, allianora)\nClitoral(allianora)\nMarbleise(solly, yardley)\nIntimate(solly)\nInspissate(solly, yardley)\nforall x (Inspissate(x, allianora) -> Integrated(x))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) -> Inspissate(x, allianora))\nforall x (Skimp(x, allianora) -> Inspissate(allianora, theda))\nforall x (Skimp(x, solly) -> Frigorific(solly))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, solly) and Skimp(solly, allianora) -> Skimp(solly, yardley))\nforall x (Skimp(x, theda) -> Integrated(theda))\nforall x (Integrated(x) -> Marbleise(x, theda))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) and Inspissate(x, solly) -> Skimp(solly, yardley))\n\nnot Integrated(theda)\n\nforall x (Inspissate(x, allianora) -> Integrated(x)) <- forall x (Clitoral(x) -> Inspissate(x, allianora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The aeriell trample the tessi. The aeriell refer the laurent. The erica trample the laurent. The laurent is dural. The tessi trample the aeriell. The tessi is behind. The tessi refer the aeriell. If someone refer the laurent then they are erratic. If someone is dural then they need the laurent. If someone spike the laurent then the laurent refer the erica. If someone spike the tessi then the tessi is null. If someone refer the tessi and the tessi spike the laurent then the tessi spike the aeriell. If someone spike the erica then the erica is erratic. If someone is erratic then they eat the erica. If someone is null and they need the tessi then the tessi spike the aeriell. The tessi is erratic.", "logic": "\nTrample(aeriell, tessi)\nRefer(aeriell, laurent)\nTrample(erica, laurent)\nDural(laurent)\nTrample(tessi, aeriell)\nBehind(tessi)\nRefer(tessi, aeriell)\nforall x (Refer(x, laurent) -> Erratic(x))\nforall x (Dural(x) -> Refer(x, laurent))\nforall x (Spike(x, laurent) -> Refer(laurent, erica))\nforall x (Spike(x, tessi) -> Null(tessi))\nforall x (Refer(x, tessi) and Spike(tessi, laurent) -> Spike(tessi, aeriell))\nforall x (Spike(x, erica) -> Erratic(erica))\nforall x (Erratic(x) -> Trample(x, erica))\nforall x (Null(x) and Refer(x, tessi) -> Spike(tessi, aeriell))\n\nErratic(tessi)\n\nforall x (Refer(x, laurent) -> Erratic(x)) <- forall x (Dural(x) -> Refer(x, laurent)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The neville hygienise the stephi. The neville rifle the oliy. The lizzie hygienise the oliy. The oliy is surgical. The stephi hygienise the neville. The stephi is receptive. The stephi rifle the neville. If someone rifle the oliy then they are dietetic. If someone is surgical then they need the oliy. If someone roister the oliy then the oliy rifle the lizzie. If someone roister the stephi then the stephi is daring. If someone rifle the stephi and the stephi roister the oliy then the stephi roister the neville. If someone roister the lizzie then the lizzie is dietetic. If someone is dietetic then they eat the lizzie. If someone is daring and they need the stephi then the stephi roister the neville. The lizzie does not eat the lizzie.", "logic": "\nHygienise(neville, stephi)\nRifle(neville, oliy)\nHygienise(lizzie, oliy)\nSurgical(oliy)\nHygienise(stephi, neville)\nReceptive(stephi)\nRifle(stephi, neville)\nforall x (Rifle(x, oliy) -> Dietetic(x))\nforall x (Surgical(x) -> Rifle(x, oliy))\nforall x (Roister(x, oliy) -> Rifle(oliy, lizzie))\nforall x (Roister(x, stephi) -> Daring(stephi))\nforall x (Rifle(x, stephi) and Roister(stephi, oliy) -> Roister(stephi, neville))\nforall x (Roister(x, lizzie) -> Dietetic(lizzie))\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Hygienise(x, lizzie))\nforall x (Daring(x) and Rifle(x, stephi) -> Roister(stephi, neville))\n\nnot Hygienise(lizzie, lizzie)\n\nforall x (Dietetic(x) -> Hygienise(x, lizzie)) <- forall x (Rifle(x, oliy) -> Dietetic(x)) <- forall x (Surgical(x) -> Rifle(x, oliy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The ericha anathemise the lazarus. The ericha discontent the matthew. The stormy anathemise the matthew. The matthew is dreary. The lazarus anathemise the ericha. The lazarus is semisweet. The lazarus discontent the ericha. If someone discontent the matthew then they are canny. If someone is dreary then they need the matthew. If someone constipate the matthew then the matthew discontent the stormy. If someone constipate the lazarus then the lazarus is acerbic. If someone discontent the lazarus and the lazarus constipate the matthew then the lazarus constipate the ericha. If someone constipate the stormy then the stormy is canny. If someone is canny then they eat the stormy. If someone is acerbic and they need the lazarus then the lazarus constipate the ericha. The lazarus constipate the ericha.", "logic": "\nAnathemise(ericha, lazarus)\nDiscontent(ericha, matthew)\nAnathemise(stormy, matthew)\nDreary(matthew)\nAnathemise(lazarus, ericha)\nSemisweet(lazarus)\nDiscontent(lazarus, ericha)\nforall x (Discontent(x, matthew) -> Canny(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) -> Discontent(x, matthew))\nforall x (Constipate(x, matthew) -> Discontent(matthew, stormy))\nforall x (Constipate(x, lazarus) -> Acerbic(lazarus))\nforall x (Discontent(x, lazarus) and Constipate(lazarus, matthew) -> Constipate(lazarus, ericha))\nforall x (Constipate(x, stormy) -> Canny(stormy))\nforall x (Canny(x) -> Anathemise(x, stormy))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) and Discontent(x, lazarus) -> Constipate(lazarus, ericha))\n\nConstipate(lazarus, ericha)\n\nforall x (Discontent(x, lazarus) and Constipate(lazarus, matthew) -> Constipate(lazarus, ericha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The janet unsolder the valentina. The janet blunt the cilka. The edna unsolder the cilka. The cilka is sick. The valentina unsolder the janet. The valentina is talismanic. The valentina blunt the janet. If someone blunt the cilka then they are soiled. If someone is sick then they need the cilka. If someone grease the cilka then the cilka blunt the edna. If someone grease the valentina then the valentina is sissified. If someone blunt the valentina and the valentina grease the cilka then the valentina grease the janet. If someone grease the edna then the edna is soiled. If someone is soiled then they eat the edna. If someone is sissified and they need the valentina then the valentina grease the janet. The cilka does not chase the edna.", "logic": "\nUnsolder(janet, valentina)\nBlunt(janet, cilka)\nUnsolder(edna, cilka)\nSick(cilka)\nUnsolder(valentina, janet)\nTalismanic(valentina)\nBlunt(valentina, janet)\nforall x (Blunt(x, cilka) -> Soiled(x))\nforall x (Sick(x) -> Blunt(x, cilka))\nforall x (Grease(x, cilka) -> Blunt(cilka, edna))\nforall x (Grease(x, valentina) -> Sissified(valentina))\nforall x (Blunt(x, valentina) and Grease(valentina, cilka) -> Grease(valentina, janet))\nforall x (Grease(x, edna) -> Soiled(edna))\nforall x (Soiled(x) -> Unsolder(x, edna))\nforall x (Sissified(x) and Blunt(x, valentina) -> Grease(valentina, janet))\n\nnot Grease(cilka, edna)\n\nnot Grease(cilka, edna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The quiggly rail the adi. The quiggly dynamite the aristotle. The aigneis rail the aristotle. The aristotle is toothless. The adi rail the quiggly. The adi is vixenish. The adi dynamite the quiggly. If someone dynamite the aristotle then they are azotic. If someone is toothless then they need the aristotle. If someone oxidate the aristotle then the aristotle dynamite the aigneis. If someone oxidate the adi then the adi is neritic. If someone dynamite the adi and the adi oxidate the aristotle then the adi oxidate the quiggly. If someone oxidate the aigneis then the aigneis is azotic. If someone is azotic then they eat the aigneis. If someone is neritic and they need the adi then the adi oxidate the quiggly. The aigneis is neritic.", "logic": "\nRail(quiggly, adi)\nDynamite(quiggly, aristotle)\nRail(aigneis, aristotle)\nToothless(aristotle)\nRail(adi, quiggly)\nVixenish(adi)\nDynamite(adi, quiggly)\nforall x (Dynamite(x, aristotle) -> Azotic(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Dynamite(x, aristotle))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, aristotle) -> Dynamite(aristotle, aigneis))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, adi) -> Neritic(adi))\nforall x (Dynamite(x, adi) and Oxidate(adi, aristotle) -> Oxidate(adi, quiggly))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, aigneis) -> Azotic(aigneis))\nforall x (Azotic(x) -> Rail(x, aigneis))\nforall x (Neritic(x) and Dynamite(x, adi) -> Oxidate(adi, quiggly))\n\nNeritic(aigneis)\n\nNeritic(aigneis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The cappella encourage the bela. The cappella gravitate the lyn. The cathryn encourage the lyn. The lyn is ageing. The bela encourage the cappella. The bela is chagrined. The bela gravitate the cappella. If someone gravitate the lyn then they are figured. If someone is ageing then they need the lyn. If someone hunker the lyn then the lyn gravitate the cathryn. If someone hunker the bela then the bela is lousy. If someone gravitate the bela and the bela hunker the lyn then the bela hunker the cappella. If someone hunker the cathryn then the cathryn is figured. If someone is figured then they eat the cathryn. If someone is lousy and they need the bela then the bela hunker the cappella. The cathryn does not need the cappella.", "logic": "\nEncourage(cappella, bela)\nGravitate(cappella, lyn)\nEncourage(cathryn, lyn)\nAgeing(lyn)\nEncourage(bela, cappella)\nChagrined(bela)\nGravitate(bela, cappella)\nforall x (Gravitate(x, lyn) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Ageing(x) -> Gravitate(x, lyn))\nforall x (Hunker(x, lyn) -> Gravitate(lyn, cathryn))\nforall x (Hunker(x, bela) -> Lousy(bela))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, bela) and Hunker(bela, lyn) -> Hunker(bela, cappella))\nforall x (Hunker(x, cathryn) -> Figured(cathryn))\nforall x (Figured(x) -> Encourage(x, cathryn))\nforall x (Lousy(x) and Gravitate(x, bela) -> Hunker(bela, cappella))\n\nnot Gravitate(cathryn, cappella)\n\nnot Gravitate(cathryn, cappella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The sol puzzle the tulley. The sol unify the oleg. The eustace puzzle the oleg. The oleg is emarginate. The tulley puzzle the sol. The tulley is seraphical. The tulley unify the sol. If someone unify the oleg then they are tinkling. If someone is emarginate then they need the oleg. If someone anodize the oleg then the oleg unify the eustace. If someone anodize the tulley then the tulley is crumpled. If someone unify the tulley and the tulley anodize the oleg then the tulley anodize the sol. If someone anodize the eustace then the eustace is tinkling. If someone is tinkling then they eat the eustace. If someone is crumpled and they need the tulley then the tulley anodize the sol. The tulley anodize the oleg.", "logic": "\nPuzzle(sol, tulley)\nUnify(sol, oleg)\nPuzzle(eustace, oleg)\nEmarginate(oleg)\nPuzzle(tulley, sol)\nSeraphical(tulley)\nUnify(tulley, sol)\nforall x (Unify(x, oleg) -> Tinkling(x))\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Unify(x, oleg))\nforall x (Anodize(x, oleg) -> Unify(oleg, eustace))\nforall x (Anodize(x, tulley) -> Crumpled(tulley))\nforall x (Unify(x, tulley) and Anodize(tulley, oleg) -> Anodize(tulley, sol))\nforall x (Anodize(x, eustace) -> Tinkling(eustace))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Puzzle(x, eustace))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) and Unify(x, tulley) -> Anodize(tulley, sol))\n\nAnodize(tulley, oleg)\n\nAnodize(tulley, oleg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "Keelia is maniac. Keelia is volumetric. Nels is maniac. Nels is sectarian. Nels is token. Nels is ungrudging. Gretna is maniac. Gretna is sectarian. Blanch is carboxylic. Blanch is ungrudging. Kind things are token. Cold things are sectarian. All token things are thoriated. Nels is token.", "logic": "\nManiac(keelia)\nVolumetric(keelia)\nManiac(nels)\nSectarian(nels)\nToken(nels)\nUngrudging(nels)\nManiac(gretna)\nSectarian(gretna)\nCarboxylic(blanch)\nUngrudging(blanch)\nforall x (Sectarian(x) -> Token(x))\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) -> Sectarian(x))\nforall x (Token(x) -> Thoriated(x))\n\nToken(nels)\n\ntherefore Token(nels)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Olin is pied. Olin is fraternal. Dom is pied. Dom is malicious. Dom is gluteal. Dom is semipublic. Phoebe is pied. Phoebe is malicious. Stefano is tomentous. Stefano is semipublic. Kind things are gluteal. Cold things are malicious. All gluteal things are untitled. Stefano is not tomentous.", "logic": "\nPied(olin)\nFraternal(olin)\nPied(dom)\nMalicious(dom)\nGluteal(dom)\nSemipublic(dom)\nPied(phoebe)\nMalicious(phoebe)\nTomentous(stefano)\nSemipublic(stefano)\nforall x (Malicious(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Malicious(x))\nforall x (Gluteal(x) -> Untitled(x))\n\nnot Tomentous(stefano)\n\ntherefore Tomentous(stefano)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Adela is omani. Adela is disguised. Gloriane is omani. Gloriane is squashy. Gloriane is accursed. Gloriane is seagirt. Glynda is omani. Glynda is squashy. Clemence is mucinoid. Clemence is seagirt. Kind things are accursed. Cold things are squashy. All accursed things are swinish. Glynda is accursed.", "logic": "\nOmani(adela)\nDisguised(adela)\nOmani(gloriane)\nSquashy(gloriane)\nAccursed(gloriane)\nSeagirt(gloriane)\nOmani(glynda)\nSquashy(glynda)\nMucinoid(clemence)\nSeagirt(clemence)\nforall x (Squashy(x) -> Accursed(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Squashy(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Swinish(x))\n\nAccursed(glynda)\n\nSquashy(glynda) and forall x (Squashy(x) -> Accursed(x)) -> therefore Accursed(glynda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Alexis is lxxi. Alexis is omnivorous. Esta is lxxi. Esta is unread. Esta is bloodless. Esta is slowgoing. Sonja is lxxi. Sonja is unread. Nance is pharaonic. Nance is slowgoing. Kind things are bloodless. Cold things are unread. All bloodless things are beady. Esta is not beady.", "logic": "\nLxxi(alexis)\nOmnivorous(alexis)\nLxxi(esta)\nUnread(esta)\nBloodless(esta)\nSlowgoing(esta)\nLxxi(sonja)\nUnread(sonja)\nPharaonic(nance)\nSlowgoing(nance)\nforall x (Unread(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Unread(x))\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Beady(x))\n\nnot Beady(esta)\n\nBloodless(esta) and forall x (Bloodless(x) -> Beady(x)) -> therefore Beady(esta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Jilleen is tearful. Jilleen is beechen. Thacher is tearful. Thacher is both. Thacher is canopied. Thacher is micropylar. Gayleen is tearful. Gayleen is both. Julita is amendatory. Julita is micropylar. Kind things are canopied. Cold things are both. All canopied things are bendable. Julita is canopied.", "logic": "\nTearful(jilleen)\nBeechen(jilleen)\nTearful(thacher)\nBoth(thacher)\nCanopied(thacher)\nMicropylar(thacher)\nTearful(gayleen)\nBoth(gayleen)\nAmendatory(julita)\nMicropylar(julita)\nforall x (Both(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Amendatory(x) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> Bendable(x))\n\nCanopied(julita)\n\nAmendatory(julita) and forall x (Amendatory(x) -> Both(x)) -> therefore Both(julita) Both(julita) and forall x (Both(x) -> Canopied(x)) -> therefore Canopied(julita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Maryrose is impotent. Maryrose is landscaped. Cecelia is impotent. Cecelia is tenor. Cecelia is coital. Cecelia is cuneiform. Zerk is impotent. Zerk is tenor. Fleurette is azotemic. Fleurette is cuneiform. Kind things are coital. Cold things are tenor. All coital things are apogamous. Zerk is not apogamous.", "logic": "\nImpotent(maryrose)\nLandscaped(maryrose)\nImpotent(cecelia)\nTenor(cecelia)\nCoital(cecelia)\nCuneiform(cecelia)\nImpotent(zerk)\nTenor(zerk)\nAzotemic(fleurette)\nCuneiform(fleurette)\nforall x (Tenor(x) -> Coital(x))\nforall x (Azotemic(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) -> Apogamous(x))\n\nnot Apogamous(zerk)\n\nTenor(zerk) and forall x (Tenor(x) -> Coital(x)) -> therefore Coital(zerk) Coital(zerk) and forall x (Coital(x) -> Apogamous(x)) -> therefore Apogamous(zerk)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Engracia is hundredth. Engracia is glary. Tybi is hundredth. Tybi is protanopic. Tybi is scowling. Tybi is tenderized. Gilbert is hundredth. Gilbert is protanopic. Corenda is marred. Corenda is tenderized. Kind things are scowling. Cold things are protanopic. All scowling things are hourly. Corenda is hourly.", "logic": "\nHundredth(engracia)\nGlary(engracia)\nHundredth(tybi)\nProtanopic(tybi)\nScowling(tybi)\nTenderized(tybi)\nHundredth(gilbert)\nProtanopic(gilbert)\nMarred(corenda)\nTenderized(corenda)\nforall x (Protanopic(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Marred(x) -> Protanopic(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) -> Hourly(x))\n\nHourly(corenda)\n\nMarred(corenda) and forall x (Marred(x) -> Protanopic(x)) -> therefore Protanopic(corenda) Protanopic(corenda) and forall x (Protanopic(x) -> Scowling(x)) -> therefore Scowling(corenda) Scowling(corenda) and forall x (Scowling(x) -> Hourly(x)) -> therefore Hourly(corenda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Camella is perpetual. Camella is sectioned. Torey is perpetual. Torey is directed. Torey is ailing. Torey is breathing. Briny is perpetual. Briny is directed. Warren is taunting. Warren is breathing. Kind things are ailing. Cold things are directed. All ailing things are canonical. Warren is not canonical.", "logic": "\nPerpetual(camella)\nSectioned(camella)\nPerpetual(torey)\nDirected(torey)\nAiling(torey)\nBreathing(torey)\nPerpetual(briny)\nDirected(briny)\nTaunting(warren)\nBreathing(warren)\nforall x (Directed(x) -> Ailing(x))\nforall x (Taunting(x) -> Directed(x))\nforall x (Ailing(x) -> Canonical(x))\n\nnot Canonical(warren)\n\nTaunting(warren) and forall x (Taunting(x) -> Directed(x)) -> therefore Directed(warren) Directed(warren) and forall x (Directed(x) -> Ailing(x)) -> therefore Ailing(warren) Ailing(warren) and forall x (Ailing(x) -> Canonical(x)) -> therefore Canonical(warren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Zackariah is manichaean. Zackariah is unkept. Tulley is manichaean. Tulley is full. Tulley is hammy. Tulley is clanking. Giovanna is manichaean. Giovanna is full. Gelya is aweigh. Gelya is clanking. Kind things are hammy. Cold things are full. All hammy things are trifoliate. Zackariah is not full.", "logic": "\nManichaean(zackariah)\nUnkept(zackariah)\nManichaean(tulley)\nFull(tulley)\nHammy(tulley)\nClanking(tulley)\nManichaean(giovanna)\nFull(giovanna)\nAweigh(gelya)\nClanking(gelya)\nforall x (Full(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Full(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Trifoliate(x))\n\nnot Full(zackariah)\n\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Full(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Marshal is indelicate. Marshal is unpeopled. Waldon is indelicate. Waldon is spacial. Waldon is migrant. Waldon is needless. Fanny is indelicate. Fanny is spacial. Thorvald is exulting. Thorvald is needless. Kind things are migrant. Cold things are spacial. All migrant things are ferocious. Marshal is ferocious.", "logic": "\nIndelicate(marshal)\nUnpeopled(marshal)\nIndelicate(waldon)\nSpacial(waldon)\nMigrant(waldon)\nNeedless(waldon)\nIndelicate(fanny)\nSpacial(fanny)\nExulting(thorvald)\nNeedless(thorvald)\nforall x (Spacial(x) -> Migrant(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Spacial(x))\nforall x (Migrant(x) -> Ferocious(x))\n\nFerocious(marshal)\n\nforall x (Migrant(x) -> Ferocious(x)) <- forall x (Spacial(x) -> Migrant(x)) <- forall x (Exulting(x) -> Spacial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Emmeline is centralist. Emmeline is saturnine. Catlin is centralist. Catlin is sotho. Catlin is boughed. Catlin is stalkless. Allianora is centralist. Allianora is sotho. Emmye is assistive. Emmye is stalkless. Kind things are boughed. Cold things are sotho. All boughed things are corrupting. Emmeline is not boughed.", "logic": "\nCentralist(emmeline)\nSaturnine(emmeline)\nCentralist(catlin)\nSotho(catlin)\nBoughed(catlin)\nStalkless(catlin)\nCentralist(allianora)\nSotho(allianora)\nAssistive(emmye)\nStalkless(emmye)\nforall x (Sotho(x) -> Boughed(x))\nforall x (Assistive(x) -> Sotho(x))\nforall x (Boughed(x) -> Corrupting(x))\n\nnot Boughed(emmeline)\n\nforall x (Sotho(x) -> Boughed(x)) <- forall x (Assistive(x) -> Sotho(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Vail is spidery. Vail is unpatented. Nadiya is spidery. Nadiya is echoic. Nadiya is noteworthy. Nadiya is unionized. Leesa is spidery. Leesa is echoic. Sarena is ichorous. Sarena is unionized. Kind things are noteworthy. Cold things are echoic. All noteworthy things are prognathic. Nadiya is unpatented.", "logic": "\nSpidery(vail)\nUnpatented(vail)\nSpidery(nadiya)\nEchoic(nadiya)\nNoteworthy(nadiya)\nUnionized(nadiya)\nSpidery(leesa)\nEchoic(leesa)\nIchorous(sarena)\nUnionized(sarena)\nforall x (Echoic(x) -> Noteworthy(x))\nforall x (Ichorous(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) -> Prognathic(x))\n\nUnpatented(nadiya)\n\nUnpatented(nadiya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Katinka is lazy. Katinka is knitted. Bogdan is lazy. Bogdan is antacid. Bogdan is unbrushed. Bogdan is redolent. Doloritas is lazy. Doloritas is antacid. Samuella is pursuing. Samuella is redolent. Kind things are unbrushed. Cold things are antacid. All unbrushed things are agamic. Samuella is not lazy.", "logic": "\nLazy(katinka)\nKnitted(katinka)\nLazy(bogdan)\nAntacid(bogdan)\nUnbrushed(bogdan)\nRedolent(bogdan)\nLazy(doloritas)\nAntacid(doloritas)\nPursuing(samuella)\nRedolent(samuella)\nforall x (Antacid(x) -> Unbrushed(x))\nforall x (Pursuing(x) -> Antacid(x))\nforall x (Unbrushed(x) -> Agamic(x))\n\nnot Lazy(samuella)\n\nnot Lazy(samuella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Robyn is rabid. Robyn is grasping. Gabey is rabid. Gabey is shrimpy. Gabey is aerobiotic. Gabey is chiseled. Celestia is rabid. Celestia is shrimpy. Mahesh is mousy. Mahesh is chiseled. Kind things are aerobiotic. Cold things are shrimpy. All aerobiotic things are filariid. Gabey is mousy.", "logic": "\nRabid(robyn)\nGrasping(robyn)\nRabid(gabey)\nShrimpy(gabey)\nAerobiotic(gabey)\nChiseled(gabey)\nRabid(celestia)\nShrimpy(celestia)\nMousy(mahesh)\nChiseled(mahesh)\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Aerobiotic(x))\nforall x (Mousy(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) -> Filariid(x))\n\nMousy(gabey)\n\nMousy(gabey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Damita is unverified. Damita is abkhazian. Alana is unverified. Alana is windy. Alana is duteous. Alana is expository. Rudolfo is unverified. Rudolfo is windy. Jennine is agaze. Jennine is expository. Kind things are duteous. Cold things are windy. All duteous things are noseless. Damita is not agaze.", "logic": "\nUnverified(damita)\nAbkhazian(damita)\nUnverified(alana)\nWindy(alana)\nDuteous(alana)\nExpository(alana)\nUnverified(rudolfo)\nWindy(rudolfo)\nAgaze(jennine)\nExpository(jennine)\nforall x (Windy(x) -> Duteous(x))\nforall x (Agaze(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Duteous(x) -> Noseless(x))\n\nnot Agaze(damita)\n\nnot Agaze(damita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Lucie is scurrying. Lucie is eucaryotic. Patel is scurrying. Patel is ramose. Patel is vermilion. Patel is regimental. Avrit is scurrying. Avrit is ramose. Emelda is giving. Emelda is regimental. Kind things are vermilion. Cold things are ramose. All vermilion things are world. Avrit is regimental.", "logic": "\nScurrying(lucie)\nEucaryotic(lucie)\nScurrying(patel)\nRamose(patel)\nVermilion(patel)\nRegimental(patel)\nScurrying(avrit)\nRamose(avrit)\nGiving(emelda)\nRegimental(emelda)\nforall x (Ramose(x) -> Vermilion(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) -> Ramose(x))\nforall x (Vermilion(x) -> World(x))\n\nRegimental(avrit)\n\nRegimental(avrit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Reynolds is hebraical. Reynolds is disheveled. Reynolds is lobate. Reynolds is multiphase. Reynolds is liquid. Codie is fearsome. Codie is hebraical. Codie is disheveled. Codie is coenobitic. Codie is lobate. Codie is multiphase. Codie is liquid. Izak is fearsome. Izak is hebraical. Izak is coenobitic. Izak is liquid. Rough, liquid things are lobate. If Izak is disheveled then Izak is multiphase. If something is coenobitic then it is disheveled. Reynolds is multiphase.", "logic": "\nHebraical(reynolds)\nDisheveled(reynolds)\nLobate(reynolds)\nMultiphase(reynolds)\nLiquid(reynolds)\nFearsome(codie)\nHebraical(codie)\nDisheveled(codie)\nCoenobitic(codie)\nLobate(codie)\nMultiphase(codie)\nLiquid(codie)\nFearsome(izak)\nHebraical(izak)\nCoenobitic(izak)\nLiquid(izak)\nforall x (Multiphase(x) and Liquid(x) -> Lobate(x))\nDisheveled(izak) -> Multiphase(izak)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Disheveled(x))\n\nMultiphase(reynolds)\n\ntherefore Multiphase(reynolds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Cain is lugubrious. Cain is prongy. Cain is vindictive. Cain is diluted. Cain is arterial. Titus is ukrainian. Titus is lugubrious. Titus is prongy. Titus is unsweet. Titus is vindictive. Titus is diluted. Titus is arterial. Brit is ukrainian. Brit is lugubrious. Brit is unsweet. Brit is arterial. Rough, arterial things are vindictive. If Brit is prongy then Brit is diluted. If something is unsweet then it is prongy. Titus is not lugubrious.", "logic": "\nLugubrious(cain)\nProngy(cain)\nVindictive(cain)\nDiluted(cain)\nArterial(cain)\nUkrainian(titus)\nLugubrious(titus)\nProngy(titus)\nUnsweet(titus)\nVindictive(titus)\nDiluted(titus)\nArterial(titus)\nUkrainian(brit)\nLugubrious(brit)\nUnsweet(brit)\nArterial(brit)\nforall x (Diluted(x) and Arterial(x) -> Vindictive(x))\nProngy(brit) -> Diluted(brit)\nforall x (Unsweet(x) -> Prongy(x))\n\nnot Lugubrious(titus)\n\ntherefore Lugubrious(titus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Reube is diplomatic. Reube is legal. Reube is tigerish. Reube is macho. Reube is unsinkable. Hansel is ruinous. Hansel is diplomatic. Hansel is legal. Hansel is dioestrous. Hansel is tigerish. Hansel is macho. Hansel is unsinkable. Hedy is ruinous. Hedy is diplomatic. Hedy is dioestrous. Hedy is unsinkable. Rough, unsinkable things are tigerish. If Hedy is legal then Hedy is macho. If something is dioestrous then it is legal. Hedy is legal.", "logic": "\nDiplomatic(reube)\nLegal(reube)\nTigerish(reube)\nMacho(reube)\nUnsinkable(reube)\nRuinous(hansel)\nDiplomatic(hansel)\nLegal(hansel)\nDioestrous(hansel)\nTigerish(hansel)\nMacho(hansel)\nUnsinkable(hansel)\nRuinous(hedy)\nDiplomatic(hedy)\nDioestrous(hedy)\nUnsinkable(hedy)\nforall x (Macho(x) and Unsinkable(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nLegal(hedy) -> Macho(hedy)\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Legal(x))\n\nLegal(hedy)\n\nDioestrous(hedy) and forall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Legal(x)) -> therefore Legal(hedy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Bambi is agonistic. Bambi is sage. Bambi is apotropaic. Bambi is grateful. Bambi is orange. Bettie is sparkly. Bettie is agonistic. Bettie is sage. Bettie is nett. Bettie is apotropaic. Bettie is grateful. Bettie is orange. Rivkah is sparkly. Rivkah is agonistic. Rivkah is nett. Rivkah is orange. Rough, orange things are apotropaic. If Rivkah is sage then Rivkah is grateful. If something is nett then it is sage. Rivkah is not sage.", "logic": "\nAgonistic(bambi)\nSage(bambi)\nApotropaic(bambi)\nGrateful(bambi)\nOrange(bambi)\nSparkly(bettie)\nAgonistic(bettie)\nSage(bettie)\nNett(bettie)\nApotropaic(bettie)\nGrateful(bettie)\nOrange(bettie)\nSparkly(rivkah)\nAgonistic(rivkah)\nNett(rivkah)\nOrange(rivkah)\nforall x (Grateful(x) and Orange(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\nSage(rivkah) -> Grateful(rivkah)\nforall x (Nett(x) -> Sage(x))\n\nnot Sage(rivkah)\n\nNett(rivkah) and forall x (Nett(x) -> Sage(x)) -> therefore Sage(rivkah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Husein is lucid. Husein is hepatic. Husein is obsessed. Husein is bland. Husein is choky. Mendie is leibnizian. Mendie is lucid. Mendie is hepatic. Mendie is jawless. Mendie is obsessed. Mendie is bland. Mendie is choky. Stanfield is leibnizian. Stanfield is lucid. Stanfield is jawless. Stanfield is choky. Rough, choky things are obsessed. If Stanfield is hepatic then Stanfield is bland. If something is jawless then it is hepatic. Stanfield is bland.", "logic": "\nLucid(husein)\nHepatic(husein)\nObsessed(husein)\nBland(husein)\nChoky(husein)\nLeibnizian(mendie)\nLucid(mendie)\nHepatic(mendie)\nJawless(mendie)\nObsessed(mendie)\nBland(mendie)\nChoky(mendie)\nLeibnizian(stanfield)\nLucid(stanfield)\nJawless(stanfield)\nChoky(stanfield)\nforall x (Bland(x) and Choky(x) -> Obsessed(x))\nHepatic(stanfield) -> Bland(stanfield)\nforall x (Jawless(x) -> Hepatic(x))\n\nBland(stanfield)\n\nJawless(stanfield) and forall x (Jawless(x) -> Hepatic(x)) -> therefore Hepatic(stanfield) Hepatic(stanfield) and Hepatic(stanfield) -> Bland(stanfield) -> therefore Bland(stanfield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Eolanda is stylized. Eolanda is untactful. Eolanda is chaldaean. Eolanda is coaxial. Eolanda is fledgeless. Elyssa is star. Elyssa is stylized. Elyssa is untactful. Elyssa is setose. Elyssa is chaldaean. Elyssa is coaxial. Elyssa is fledgeless. Angus is star. Angus is stylized. Angus is setose. Angus is fledgeless. Rough, fledgeless things are chaldaean. If Angus is untactful then Angus is coaxial. If something is setose then it is untactful. Angus is not coaxial.", "logic": "\nStylized(eolanda)\nUntactful(eolanda)\nChaldaean(eolanda)\nCoaxial(eolanda)\nFledgeless(eolanda)\nStar(elyssa)\nStylized(elyssa)\nUntactful(elyssa)\nSetose(elyssa)\nChaldaean(elyssa)\nCoaxial(elyssa)\nFledgeless(elyssa)\nStar(angus)\nStylized(angus)\nSetose(angus)\nFledgeless(angus)\nforall x (Coaxial(x) and Fledgeless(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nUntactful(angus) -> Coaxial(angus)\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Untactful(x))\n\nnot Coaxial(angus)\n\nSetose(angus) and forall x (Setose(x) -> Untactful(x)) -> therefore Untactful(angus) Untactful(angus) and Untactful(angus) -> Coaxial(angus) -> therefore Coaxial(angus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Meier is rancid. Meier is assisted. Meier is funny. Meier is reputable. Meier is culpable. Prentice is whiplike. Prentice is rancid. Prentice is assisted. Prentice is humanist. Prentice is funny. Prentice is reputable. Prentice is culpable. Letta is whiplike. Letta is rancid. Letta is humanist. Letta is culpable. Rough, culpable things are funny. If Letta is assisted then Letta is reputable. If something is humanist then it is assisted. Letta is funny.", "logic": "\nRancid(meier)\nAssisted(meier)\nFunny(meier)\nReputable(meier)\nCulpable(meier)\nWhiplike(prentice)\nRancid(prentice)\nAssisted(prentice)\nHumanist(prentice)\nFunny(prentice)\nReputable(prentice)\nCulpable(prentice)\nWhiplike(letta)\nRancid(letta)\nHumanist(letta)\nCulpable(letta)\nforall x (Reputable(x) and Culpable(x) -> Funny(x))\nAssisted(letta) -> Reputable(letta)\nforall x (Humanist(x) -> Assisted(x))\n\nFunny(letta)\n\nHumanist(letta) and forall x (Humanist(x) -> Assisted(x)) -> therefore Assisted(letta) Assisted(letta) and Assisted(letta) -> Reputable(letta) -> therefore Reputable(letta) Reputable(letta) and Culpable(letta) and forall x (Reputable(x) and Culpable(x) -> Funny(x)) -> therefore Funny(letta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Lorie is spiny. Lorie is barbarous. Lorie is misguided. Lorie is cataleptic. Lorie is troublous. Francisca is lapidarian. Francisca is spiny. Francisca is barbarous. Francisca is bungling. Francisca is misguided. Francisca is cataleptic. Francisca is troublous. Jodi is lapidarian. Jodi is spiny. Jodi is bungling. Jodi is troublous. Rough, troublous things are misguided. If Jodi is barbarous then Jodi is cataleptic. If something is bungling then it is barbarous. Jodi is not misguided.", "logic": "\nSpiny(lorie)\nBarbarous(lorie)\nMisguided(lorie)\nCataleptic(lorie)\nTroublous(lorie)\nLapidarian(francisca)\nSpiny(francisca)\nBarbarous(francisca)\nBungling(francisca)\nMisguided(francisca)\nCataleptic(francisca)\nTroublous(francisca)\nLapidarian(jodi)\nSpiny(jodi)\nBungling(jodi)\nTroublous(jodi)\nforall x (Cataleptic(x) and Troublous(x) -> Misguided(x))\nBarbarous(jodi) -> Cataleptic(jodi)\nforall x (Bungling(x) -> Barbarous(x))\n\nnot Misguided(jodi)\n\nBungling(jodi) and forall x (Bungling(x) -> Barbarous(x)) -> therefore Barbarous(jodi) Barbarous(jodi) and Barbarous(jodi) -> Cataleptic(jodi) -> therefore Cataleptic(jodi) Cataleptic(jodi) and Troublous(jodi) and forall x (Cataleptic(x) and Troublous(x) -> Misguided(x)) -> therefore Misguided(jodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Erastus is sceptered. Erastus is marly. Erastus is caucasic. Erastus is deceptive. Erastus is thenar. Estele is catchy. Estele is sceptered. Estele is marly. Estele is drooping. Estele is caucasic. Estele is deceptive. Estele is thenar. Thomasina is catchy. Thomasina is sceptered. Thomasina is drooping. Thomasina is thenar. Rough, thenar things are caucasic. If Thomasina is marly then Thomasina is deceptive. If something is drooping then it is marly. Erastus is not catchy.", "logic": "\nSceptered(erastus)\nMarly(erastus)\nCaucasic(erastus)\nDeceptive(erastus)\nThenar(erastus)\nCatchy(estele)\nSceptered(estele)\nMarly(estele)\nDrooping(estele)\nCaucasic(estele)\nDeceptive(estele)\nThenar(estele)\nCatchy(thomasina)\nSceptered(thomasina)\nDrooping(thomasina)\nThenar(thomasina)\nforall x (Deceptive(x) and Thenar(x) -> Caucasic(x))\nMarly(thomasina) -> Deceptive(thomasina)\nforall x (Drooping(x) -> Marly(x))\n\nnot Catchy(erastus)\n\nnot Catchy(erastus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Eugine is serflike. Eugine is schmalzy. Eugine is unimodal. Eugine is subarctic. Eugine is pronominal. Ronica is impenitent. Ronica is serflike. Ronica is schmalzy. Ronica is ecdemic. Ronica is unimodal. Ronica is subarctic. Ronica is pronominal. Margurite is impenitent. Margurite is serflike. Margurite is ecdemic. Margurite is pronominal. Rough, pronominal things are unimodal. If Margurite is schmalzy then Margurite is subarctic. If something is ecdemic then it is schmalzy. Eugine is ecdemic.", "logic": "\nSerflike(eugine)\nSchmalzy(eugine)\nUnimodal(eugine)\nSubarctic(eugine)\nPronominal(eugine)\nImpenitent(ronica)\nSerflike(ronica)\nSchmalzy(ronica)\nEcdemic(ronica)\nUnimodal(ronica)\nSubarctic(ronica)\nPronominal(ronica)\nImpenitent(margurite)\nSerflike(margurite)\nEcdemic(margurite)\nPronominal(margurite)\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and Pronominal(x) -> Unimodal(x))\nSchmalzy(margurite) -> Subarctic(margurite)\nforall x (Ecdemic(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\n\nEcdemic(eugine)\n\nEcdemic(eugine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "The gav grade the archibold. The gav impinge the archibold. The gav is antiviral. The gav is caruncular. The gav is defiant. The gav is bugged. The gav is messianic. The gav wrack the archibold. The archibold grade the gav. The archibold impinge the gav. The archibold is antiviral. The archibold is caruncular. The archibold is defiant. The archibold is bugged. The archibold is messianic. The archibold wrack the gav. If someone wrack the gav then the gav is defiant. If someone is bugged and they eat the gav then they need the archibold. If the gav grade the archibold and the archibold grade the gav then the archibold impinge the gav. If someone wrack the gav and they are defiant then the gav is antiviral. If the archibold impinge the gav then the gav wrack the archibold. If someone wrack the archibold then they chase the archibold. If someone is defiant then they chase the gav. If someone grade the archibold then they eat the archibold. The archibold is defiant.", "logic": "\nGrade(gav, archibold)\nImpinge(gav, archibold)\nAntiviral(gav)\nCaruncular(gav)\nDefiant(gav)\nBugged(gav)\nMessianic(gav)\nWrack(gav, archibold)\nGrade(archibold, gav)\nImpinge(archibold, gav)\nAntiviral(archibold)\nCaruncular(archibold)\nDefiant(archibold)\nBugged(archibold)\nMessianic(archibold)\nWrack(archibold, gav)\nforall x (Wrack(x, gav) -> Defiant(gav))\nforall x (Bugged(x) and Impinge(x, gav) -> Wrack(x, archibold))\nGrade(gav, archibold) and Grade(archibold, gav) -> Impinge(archibold, gav)\nforall x (Wrack(x, gav) and Defiant(x) -> Antiviral(gav))\nImpinge(archibold, gav) -> Wrack(gav, archibold)\nforall x (Wrack(x, archibold) -> Grade(x, archibold))\nforall x (Defiant(x) -> Grade(x, gav))\nforall x (Grade(x, archibold) -> Impinge(x, archibold))\n\nDefiant(archibold)\n\ntherefore Defiant(archibold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The bonny pollute the carlotta. The bonny pacify the carlotta. The bonny is skyward. The bonny is palsied. The bonny is bigeneric. The bonny is restive. The bonny is westside. The bonny tolerate the carlotta. The carlotta pollute the bonny. The carlotta pacify the bonny. The carlotta is skyward. The carlotta is palsied. The carlotta is bigeneric. The carlotta is restive. The carlotta is westside. The carlotta tolerate the bonny. If someone tolerate the bonny then the bonny is bigeneric. If someone is restive and they eat the bonny then they need the carlotta. If the bonny pollute the carlotta and the carlotta pollute the bonny then the carlotta pacify the bonny. If someone tolerate the bonny and they are bigeneric then the bonny is skyward. If the carlotta pacify the bonny then the bonny tolerate the carlotta. If someone tolerate the carlotta then they chase the carlotta. If someone is bigeneric then they chase the bonny. If someone pollute the carlotta then they eat the carlotta. The carlotta does not need the bonny.", "logic": "\nPollute(bonny, carlotta)\nPacify(bonny, carlotta)\nSkyward(bonny)\nPalsied(bonny)\nBigeneric(bonny)\nRestive(bonny)\nWestside(bonny)\nTolerate(bonny, carlotta)\nPollute(carlotta, bonny)\nPacify(carlotta, bonny)\nSkyward(carlotta)\nPalsied(carlotta)\nBigeneric(carlotta)\nRestive(carlotta)\nWestside(carlotta)\nTolerate(carlotta, bonny)\nforall x (Tolerate(x, bonny) -> Bigeneric(bonny))\nforall x (Restive(x) and Pacify(x, bonny) -> Tolerate(x, carlotta))\nPollute(bonny, carlotta) and Pollute(carlotta, bonny) -> Pacify(carlotta, bonny)\nforall x (Tolerate(x, bonny) and Bigeneric(x) -> Skyward(bonny))\nPacify(carlotta, bonny) -> Tolerate(bonny, carlotta)\nforall x (Tolerate(x, carlotta) -> Pollute(x, carlotta))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Pollute(x, bonny))\nforall x (Pollute(x, carlotta) -> Pacify(x, carlotta))\n\nnot Tolerate(carlotta, bonny)\n\ntherefore Tolerate(carlotta, bonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The nevil alkalinize the georgia. The nevil lacquer the georgia. The nevil is benighted. The nevil is asian. The nevil is swinging. The nevil is lentissimo. The nevil is righteous. The nevil damascene the georgia. The georgia alkalinize the nevil. The georgia lacquer the nevil. The georgia is benighted. The georgia is asian. The georgia is swinging. The georgia is lentissimo. The georgia is righteous. The georgia damascene the nevil. If someone damascene the nevil then the nevil is swinging. If someone is lentissimo and they eat the nevil then they need the georgia. If the nevil alkalinize the georgia and the georgia alkalinize the nevil then the georgia lacquer the nevil. If someone damascene the nevil and they are swinging then the nevil is benighted. If the georgia lacquer the nevil then the nevil damascene the georgia. If someone damascene the georgia then they chase the georgia. If someone is swinging then they chase the nevil. If someone alkalinize the georgia then they eat the georgia. The nevil alkalinize the nevil.", "logic": "\nAlkalinize(nevil, georgia)\nLacquer(nevil, georgia)\nBenighted(nevil)\nAsian(nevil)\nSwinging(nevil)\nLentissimo(nevil)\nRighteous(nevil)\nDamascene(nevil, georgia)\nAlkalinize(georgia, nevil)\nLacquer(georgia, nevil)\nBenighted(georgia)\nAsian(georgia)\nSwinging(georgia)\nLentissimo(georgia)\nRighteous(georgia)\nDamascene(georgia, nevil)\nforall x (Damascene(x, nevil) -> Swinging(nevil))\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) and Lacquer(x, nevil) -> Damascene(x, georgia))\nAlkalinize(nevil, georgia) and Alkalinize(georgia, nevil) -> Lacquer(georgia, nevil)\nforall x (Damascene(x, nevil) and Swinging(x) -> Benighted(nevil))\nLacquer(georgia, nevil) -> Damascene(nevil, georgia)\nforall x (Damascene(x, georgia) -> Alkalinize(x, georgia))\nforall x (Swinging(x) -> Alkalinize(x, nevil))\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, georgia) -> Lacquer(x, georgia))\n\nAlkalinize(nevil, nevil)\n\nSwinging(nevil) and forall x (Swinging(x) -> Alkalinize(x, nevil)) -> therefore Alkalinize(nevil, nevil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The dante dinge the reynolds. The dante twit the reynolds. The dante is downfield. The dante is gratifying. The dante is pouched. The dante is moralistic. The dante is jainist. The dante print the reynolds. The reynolds dinge the dante. The reynolds twit the dante. The reynolds is downfield. The reynolds is gratifying. The reynolds is pouched. The reynolds is moralistic. The reynolds is jainist. The reynolds print the dante. If someone print the dante then the dante is pouched. If someone is moralistic and they eat the dante then they need the reynolds. If the dante dinge the reynolds and the reynolds dinge the dante then the reynolds twit the dante. If someone print the dante and they are pouched then the dante is downfield. If the reynolds twit the dante then the dante print the reynolds. If someone print the reynolds then they chase the reynolds. If someone is pouched then they chase the dante. If someone dinge the reynolds then they eat the reynolds. The reynolds does not need the reynolds.", "logic": "\nDinge(dante, reynolds)\nTwit(dante, reynolds)\nDownfield(dante)\nGratifying(dante)\nPouched(dante)\nMoralistic(dante)\nJainist(dante)\nPrint(dante, reynolds)\nDinge(reynolds, dante)\nTwit(reynolds, dante)\nDownfield(reynolds)\nGratifying(reynolds)\nPouched(reynolds)\nMoralistic(reynolds)\nJainist(reynolds)\nPrint(reynolds, dante)\nforall x (Print(x, dante) -> Pouched(dante))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) and Twit(x, dante) -> Print(x, reynolds))\nDinge(dante, reynolds) and Dinge(reynolds, dante) -> Twit(reynolds, dante)\nforall x (Print(x, dante) and Pouched(x) -> Downfield(dante))\nTwit(reynolds, dante) -> Print(dante, reynolds)\nforall x (Print(x, reynolds) -> Dinge(x, reynolds))\nforall x (Pouched(x) -> Dinge(x, dante))\nforall x (Dinge(x, reynolds) -> Twit(x, reynolds))\n\nnot Print(reynolds, reynolds)\n\nMoralistic(reynolds) and Twit(reynolds, dante) and forall x (Moralistic(x) and Twit(x, dante) -> Print(x, reynolds)) -> therefore Print(reynolds, reynolds)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The bruce ware the kent. The bruce mulct the kent. The bruce is countywide. The bruce is combative. The bruce is tragical. The bruce is behindhand. The bruce is apraxic. The bruce burl the kent. The kent ware the bruce. The kent mulct the bruce. The kent is countywide. The kent is combative. The kent is tragical. The kent is behindhand. The kent is apraxic. The kent burl the bruce. If someone burl the bruce then the bruce is tragical. If someone is behindhand and they eat the bruce then they need the kent. If the bruce ware the kent and the kent ware the bruce then the kent mulct the bruce. If someone burl the bruce and they are tragical then the bruce is countywide. If the kent mulct the bruce then the bruce burl the kent. If someone burl the kent then they chase the kent. If someone is tragical then they chase the bruce. If someone ware the kent then they eat the kent. The kent ware the kent.", "logic": "\nWare(bruce, kent)\nMulct(bruce, kent)\nCountywide(bruce)\nCombative(bruce)\nTragical(bruce)\nBehindhand(bruce)\nApraxic(bruce)\nBurl(bruce, kent)\nWare(kent, bruce)\nMulct(kent, bruce)\nCountywide(kent)\nCombative(kent)\nTragical(kent)\nBehindhand(kent)\nApraxic(kent)\nBurl(kent, bruce)\nforall x (Burl(x, bruce) -> Tragical(bruce))\nforall x (Behindhand(x) and Mulct(x, bruce) -> Burl(x, kent))\nWare(bruce, kent) and Ware(kent, bruce) -> Mulct(kent, bruce)\nforall x (Burl(x, bruce) and Tragical(x) -> Countywide(bruce))\nMulct(kent, bruce) -> Burl(bruce, kent)\nforall x (Burl(x, kent) -> Ware(x, kent))\nforall x (Tragical(x) -> Ware(x, bruce))\nforall x (Ware(x, kent) -> Mulct(x, kent))\n\nWare(kent, kent)\n\nBehindhand(kent) and Mulct(kent, bruce) and forall x (Behindhand(x) and Mulct(x, bruce) -> Burl(x, kent)) -> therefore Burl(kent, kent) Burl(kent, kent) and forall x (Burl(x, kent) -> Ware(x, kent)) -> therefore Ware(kent, kent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The robbyn stiffen the mag. The robbyn gnash the mag. The robbyn is impetuous. The robbyn is unemployed. The robbyn is phonetic. The robbyn is poorly. The robbyn is ordinal. The robbyn chloroform the mag. The mag stiffen the robbyn. The mag gnash the robbyn. The mag is impetuous. The mag is unemployed. The mag is phonetic. The mag is poorly. The mag is ordinal. The mag chloroform the robbyn. If someone chloroform the robbyn then the robbyn is phonetic. If someone is poorly and they eat the robbyn then they need the mag. If the robbyn stiffen the mag and the mag stiffen the robbyn then the mag gnash the robbyn. If someone chloroform the robbyn and they are phonetic then the robbyn is impetuous. If the mag gnash the robbyn then the robbyn chloroform the mag. If someone chloroform the mag then they chase the mag. If someone is phonetic then they chase the robbyn. If someone stiffen the mag then they eat the mag. The mag does not chase the mag.", "logic": "\nStiffen(robbyn, mag)\nGnash(robbyn, mag)\nImpetuous(robbyn)\nUnemployed(robbyn)\nPhonetic(robbyn)\nPoorly(robbyn)\nOrdinal(robbyn)\nChloroform(robbyn, mag)\nStiffen(mag, robbyn)\nGnash(mag, robbyn)\nImpetuous(mag)\nUnemployed(mag)\nPhonetic(mag)\nPoorly(mag)\nOrdinal(mag)\nChloroform(mag, robbyn)\nforall x (Chloroform(x, robbyn) -> Phonetic(robbyn))\nforall x (Poorly(x) and Gnash(x, robbyn) -> Chloroform(x, mag))\nStiffen(robbyn, mag) and Stiffen(mag, robbyn) -> Gnash(mag, robbyn)\nforall x (Chloroform(x, robbyn) and Phonetic(x) -> Impetuous(robbyn))\nGnash(mag, robbyn) -> Chloroform(robbyn, mag)\nforall x (Chloroform(x, mag) -> Stiffen(x, mag))\nforall x (Phonetic(x) -> Stiffen(x, robbyn))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, mag) -> Gnash(x, mag))\n\nnot Stiffen(mag, mag)\n\nPoorly(mag) and Gnash(mag, robbyn) and forall x (Poorly(x) and Gnash(x, robbyn) -> Chloroform(x, mag)) -> therefore Chloroform(mag, mag) Chloroform(mag, mag) and forall x (Chloroform(x, mag) -> Stiffen(x, mag)) -> therefore Stiffen(mag, mag)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The olga refit the clemente. The olga infract the clemente. The olga is pleural. The olga is amiss. The olga is unseeing. The olga is snaky. The olga is resurgent. The olga understudy the clemente. The clemente refit the olga. The clemente infract the olga. The clemente is pleural. The clemente is amiss. The clemente is unseeing. The clemente is snaky. The clemente is resurgent. The clemente understudy the olga. If someone understudy the olga then the olga is unseeing. If someone is snaky and they eat the olga then they need the clemente. If the olga refit the clemente and the clemente refit the olga then the clemente infract the olga. If someone understudy the olga and they are unseeing then the olga is pleural. If the clemente infract the olga then the olga understudy the clemente. If someone understudy the clemente then they chase the clemente. If someone is unseeing then they chase the olga. If someone refit the clemente then they eat the clemente. The clemente infract the clemente.", "logic": "\nRefit(olga, clemente)\nInfract(olga, clemente)\nPleural(olga)\nAmiss(olga)\nUnseeing(olga)\nSnaky(olga)\nResurgent(olga)\nUnderstudy(olga, clemente)\nRefit(clemente, olga)\nInfract(clemente, olga)\nPleural(clemente)\nAmiss(clemente)\nUnseeing(clemente)\nSnaky(clemente)\nResurgent(clemente)\nUnderstudy(clemente, olga)\nforall x (Understudy(x, olga) -> Unseeing(olga))\nforall x (Snaky(x) and Infract(x, olga) -> Understudy(x, clemente))\nRefit(olga, clemente) and Refit(clemente, olga) -> Infract(clemente, olga)\nforall x (Understudy(x, olga) and Unseeing(x) -> Pleural(olga))\nInfract(clemente, olga) -> Understudy(olga, clemente)\nforall x (Understudy(x, clemente) -> Refit(x, clemente))\nforall x (Unseeing(x) -> Refit(x, olga))\nforall x (Refit(x, clemente) -> Infract(x, clemente))\n\nInfract(clemente, clemente)\n\nSnaky(clemente) and Infract(clemente, olga) and forall x (Snaky(x) and Infract(x, olga) -> Understudy(x, clemente)) -> therefore Understudy(clemente, clemente) Understudy(clemente, clemente) and forall x (Understudy(x, clemente) -> Refit(x, clemente)) -> therefore Refit(clemente, clemente) Refit(clemente, clemente) and forall x (Refit(x, clemente) -> Infract(x, clemente)) -> therefore Infract(clemente, clemente)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The torrin fumigate the dorise. The torrin deoxidise the dorise. The torrin is scaleless. The torrin is fatalist. The torrin is antidromic. The torrin is stingy. The torrin is foetal. The torrin black the dorise. The dorise fumigate the torrin. The dorise deoxidise the torrin. The dorise is scaleless. The dorise is fatalist. The dorise is antidromic. The dorise is stingy. The dorise is foetal. The dorise black the torrin. If someone black the torrin then the torrin is antidromic. If someone is stingy and they eat the torrin then they need the dorise. If the torrin fumigate the dorise and the dorise fumigate the torrin then the dorise deoxidise the torrin. If someone black the torrin and they are antidromic then the torrin is scaleless. If the dorise deoxidise the torrin then the torrin black the dorise. If someone black the dorise then they chase the dorise. If someone is antidromic then they chase the torrin. If someone fumigate the dorise then they eat the dorise. The dorise does not eat the dorise.", "logic": "\nFumigate(torrin, dorise)\nDeoxidise(torrin, dorise)\nScaleless(torrin)\nFatalist(torrin)\nAntidromic(torrin)\nStingy(torrin)\nFoetal(torrin)\nBlack(torrin, dorise)\nFumigate(dorise, torrin)\nDeoxidise(dorise, torrin)\nScaleless(dorise)\nFatalist(dorise)\nAntidromic(dorise)\nStingy(dorise)\nFoetal(dorise)\nBlack(dorise, torrin)\nforall x (Black(x, torrin) -> Antidromic(torrin))\nforall x (Stingy(x) and Deoxidise(x, torrin) -> Black(x, dorise))\nFumigate(torrin, dorise) and Fumigate(dorise, torrin) -> Deoxidise(dorise, torrin)\nforall x (Black(x, torrin) and Antidromic(x) -> Scaleless(torrin))\nDeoxidise(dorise, torrin) -> Black(torrin, dorise)\nforall x (Black(x, dorise) -> Fumigate(x, dorise))\nforall x (Antidromic(x) -> Fumigate(x, torrin))\nforall x (Fumigate(x, dorise) -> Deoxidise(x, dorise))\n\nnot Deoxidise(dorise, dorise)\n\nStingy(dorise) and Deoxidise(dorise, torrin) and forall x (Stingy(x) and Deoxidise(x, torrin) -> Black(x, dorise)) -> therefore Black(dorise, dorise) Black(dorise, dorise) and forall x (Black(x, dorise) -> Fumigate(x, dorise)) -> therefore Fumigate(dorise, dorise) Fumigate(dorise, dorise) and forall x (Fumigate(x, dorise) -> Deoxidise(x, dorise)) -> therefore Deoxidise(dorise, dorise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The lira hamper the prue. The lira metalize the prue. The lira is steadfast. The lira is plentiful. The lira is bantering. The lira is panoplied. The lira is larboard. The lira flavour the prue. The prue hamper the lira. The prue metalize the lira. The prue is steadfast. The prue is plentiful. The prue is bantering. The prue is panoplied. The prue is larboard. The prue flavour the lira. If someone flavour the lira then the lira is bantering. If someone is panoplied and they eat the lira then they need the prue. If the lira hamper the prue and the prue hamper the lira then the prue metalize the lira. If someone flavour the lira and they are bantering then the lira is steadfast. If the prue metalize the lira then the lira flavour the prue. If someone flavour the prue then they chase the prue. If someone is bantering then they chase the lira. If someone hamper the prue then they eat the prue. The lira does not need the lira.", "logic": "\nHamper(lira, prue)\nMetalize(lira, prue)\nSteadfast(lira)\nPlentiful(lira)\nBantering(lira)\nPanoplied(lira)\nLarboard(lira)\nFlavour(lira, prue)\nHamper(prue, lira)\nMetalize(prue, lira)\nSteadfast(prue)\nPlentiful(prue)\nBantering(prue)\nPanoplied(prue)\nLarboard(prue)\nFlavour(prue, lira)\nforall x (Flavour(x, lira) -> Bantering(lira))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and Metalize(x, lira) -> Flavour(x, prue))\nHamper(lira, prue) and Hamper(prue, lira) -> Metalize(prue, lira)\nforall x (Flavour(x, lira) and Bantering(x) -> Steadfast(lira))\nMetalize(prue, lira) -> Flavour(lira, prue)\nforall x (Flavour(x, prue) -> Hamper(x, prue))\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Hamper(x, lira))\nforall x (Hamper(x, prue) -> Metalize(x, prue))\n\nnot Flavour(lira, lira)\n\nnot Flavour(lira, lira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The bobine licence the lian. The bobine airt the lian. The bobine is jaded. The bobine is overlarge. The bobine is honeyed. The bobine is mercenary. The bobine is kinglike. The bobine encrust the lian. The lian licence the bobine. The lian airt the bobine. The lian is jaded. The lian is overlarge. The lian is honeyed. The lian is mercenary. The lian is kinglike. The lian encrust the bobine. If someone encrust the bobine then the bobine is honeyed. If someone is mercenary and they eat the bobine then they need the lian. If the bobine licence the lian and the lian licence the bobine then the lian airt the bobine. If someone encrust the bobine and they are honeyed then the bobine is jaded. If the lian airt the bobine then the bobine encrust the lian. If someone encrust the lian then they chase the lian. If someone is honeyed then they chase the bobine. If someone licence the lian then they eat the lian. The bobine airt the bobine.", "logic": "\nLicence(bobine, lian)\nAirt(bobine, lian)\nJaded(bobine)\nOverlarge(bobine)\nHoneyed(bobine)\nMercenary(bobine)\nKinglike(bobine)\nEncrust(bobine, lian)\nLicence(lian, bobine)\nAirt(lian, bobine)\nJaded(lian)\nOverlarge(lian)\nHoneyed(lian)\nMercenary(lian)\nKinglike(lian)\nEncrust(lian, bobine)\nforall x (Encrust(x, bobine) -> Honeyed(bobine))\nforall x (Mercenary(x) and Airt(x, bobine) -> Encrust(x, lian))\nLicence(bobine, lian) and Licence(lian, bobine) -> Airt(lian, bobine)\nforall x (Encrust(x, bobine) and Honeyed(x) -> Jaded(bobine))\nAirt(lian, bobine) -> Encrust(bobine, lian)\nforall x (Encrust(x, lian) -> Licence(x, lian))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) -> Licence(x, bobine))\nforall x (Licence(x, lian) -> Airt(x, lian))\n\nAirt(bobine, bobine)\n\nAirt(bobine, bobine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The torrie misread the avram. The torrie does not eat the avram. The torrie is amnic. The torrie is not medicinal. The torrie is not mediocre. The torrie shoot the avram. The avram misread the torrie. The avram is amnic. The avram is not brusque. The avram is mediocre. If the avram shoot the torrie and the avram is not brusque then the torrie misread the avram. If someone shoot the torrie and the torrie does not eat the avram then they chase the avram. If someone is medicinal and they eat the avram then they chase the avram. If someone is sinister then they need the avram. If someone radiate the torrie and the torrie misread the avram then the avram shoot the torrie. If someone misread the avram then the avram radiate the torrie. The avram is mediocre.", "logic": "\nMisread(torrie, avram)\nnot Radiate(torrie, avram)\nAmnic(torrie)\nnot Medicinal(torrie)\nnot Mediocre(torrie)\nShoot(torrie, avram)\nMisread(avram, torrie)\nAmnic(avram)\nnot Brusque(avram)\nMediocre(avram)\nShoot(avram, torrie) and not Brusque(avram) -> Misread(torrie, avram)\nforall x (Shoot(x, torrie) and not Radiate(torrie, avram) -> Misread(x, avram))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) and Radiate(x, avram) -> Misread(x, avram))\nforall x (Sinister(x) -> Shoot(x, avram))\nforall x (Radiate(x, torrie) and Misread(torrie, avram) -> Shoot(avram, torrie))\nforall x (Misread(x, avram) -> Radiate(avram, torrie))\n\nMediocre(avram)\n\ntherefore Mediocre(avram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The yonina seduce the janka. The yonina does not eat the janka. The yonina is auriform. The yonina is not unfocused. The yonina is not unmindful. The yonina concretize the janka. The janka seduce the yonina. The janka is auriform. The janka is not unrealized. The janka is unmindful. If the janka concretize the yonina and the janka is not unrealized then the yonina seduce the janka. If someone concretize the yonina and the yonina does not eat the janka then they chase the janka. If someone is unfocused and they eat the janka then they chase the janka. If someone is trying then they need the janka. If someone verse the yonina and the yonina seduce the janka then the janka concretize the yonina. If someone seduce the janka then the janka verse the yonina. The yonina is not auriform.", "logic": "\nSeduce(yonina, janka)\nnot Verse(yonina, janka)\nAuriform(yonina)\nnot Unfocused(yonina)\nnot Unmindful(yonina)\nConcretize(yonina, janka)\nSeduce(janka, yonina)\nAuriform(janka)\nnot Unrealized(janka)\nUnmindful(janka)\nConcretize(janka, yonina) and not Unrealized(janka) -> Seduce(yonina, janka)\nforall x (Concretize(x, yonina) and not Verse(yonina, janka) -> Seduce(x, janka))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Verse(x, janka) -> Seduce(x, janka))\nforall x (Trying(x) -> Concretize(x, janka))\nforall x (Verse(x, yonina) and Seduce(yonina, janka) -> Concretize(janka, yonina))\nforall x (Seduce(x, janka) -> Verse(janka, yonina))\n\nnot Auriform(yonina)\n\ntherefore Auriform(yonina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The carita underbid the wileen. The carita does not eat the wileen. The carita is rushlike. The carita is not seeded. The carita is not novel. The carita diabolise the wileen. The wileen underbid the carita. The wileen is rushlike. The wileen is not amuck. The wileen is novel. If the wileen diabolise the carita and the wileen is not amuck then the carita underbid the wileen. If someone diabolise the carita and the carita does not eat the wileen then they chase the wileen. If someone is seeded and they eat the wileen then they chase the wileen. If someone is suntanned then they need the wileen. If someone sailplane the carita and the carita underbid the wileen then the wileen diabolise the carita. If someone underbid the wileen then the wileen sailplane the carita. The wileen sailplane the carita.", "logic": "\nUnderbid(carita, wileen)\nnot Sailplane(carita, wileen)\nRushlike(carita)\nnot Seeded(carita)\nnot Novel(carita)\nDiabolise(carita, wileen)\nUnderbid(wileen, carita)\nRushlike(wileen)\nnot Amuck(wileen)\nNovel(wileen)\nDiabolise(wileen, carita) and not Amuck(wileen) -> Underbid(carita, wileen)\nforall x (Diabolise(x, carita) and not Sailplane(carita, wileen) -> Underbid(x, wileen))\nforall x (Seeded(x) and Sailplane(x, wileen) -> Underbid(x, wileen))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) -> Diabolise(x, wileen))\nforall x (Sailplane(x, carita) and Underbid(carita, wileen) -> Diabolise(wileen, carita))\nforall x (Underbid(x, wileen) -> Sailplane(wileen, carita))\n\nSailplane(wileen, carita)\n\nUnderbid(carita, wileen) and forall x (Underbid(x, wileen) -> Sailplane(wileen, carita)) -> therefore Sailplane(wileen, carita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The jules smell the concordia. The jules does not eat the concordia. The jules is marmoreal. The jules is not baptized. The jules is not allopatric. The jules oversee the concordia. The concordia smell the jules. The concordia is marmoreal. The concordia is not carbonous. The concordia is allopatric. If the concordia oversee the jules and the concordia is not carbonous then the jules smell the concordia. If someone oversee the jules and the jules does not eat the concordia then they chase the concordia. If someone is baptized and they eat the concordia then they chase the concordia. If someone is copacetic then they need the concordia. If someone enfeoff the jules and the jules smell the concordia then the concordia oversee the jules. If someone smell the concordia then the concordia enfeoff the jules. The concordia does not eat the jules.", "logic": "\nSmell(jules, concordia)\nnot Enfeoff(jules, concordia)\nMarmoreal(jules)\nnot Baptized(jules)\nnot Allopatric(jules)\nOversee(jules, concordia)\nSmell(concordia, jules)\nMarmoreal(concordia)\nnot Carbonous(concordia)\nAllopatric(concordia)\nOversee(concordia, jules) and not Carbonous(concordia) -> Smell(jules, concordia)\nforall x (Oversee(x, jules) and not Enfeoff(jules, concordia) -> Smell(x, concordia))\nforall x (Baptized(x) and Enfeoff(x, concordia) -> Smell(x, concordia))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Oversee(x, concordia))\nforall x (Enfeoff(x, jules) and Smell(jules, concordia) -> Oversee(concordia, jules))\nforall x (Smell(x, concordia) -> Enfeoff(concordia, jules))\n\nnot Enfeoff(concordia, jules)\n\nSmell(jules, concordia) and forall x (Smell(x, concordia) -> Enfeoff(concordia, jules)) -> therefore Enfeoff(concordia, jules)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The jill construe the jedediah. The jill does not eat the jedediah. The jill is scorbutic. The jill is not made. The jill is not adducent. The jill tabularize the jedediah. The jedediah construe the jill. The jedediah is scorbutic. The jedediah is not amaurotic. The jedediah is adducent. If the jedediah tabularize the jill and the jedediah is not amaurotic then the jill construe the jedediah. If someone tabularize the jill and the jill does not eat the jedediah then they chase the jedediah. If someone is made and they eat the jedediah then they chase the jedediah. If someone is mercantile then they need the jedediah. If someone gauffer the jill and the jill construe the jedediah then the jedediah tabularize the jill. If someone construe the jedediah then the jedediah gauffer the jill. The jedediah tabularize the jill.", "logic": "\nConstrue(jill, jedediah)\nnot Gauffer(jill, jedediah)\nScorbutic(jill)\nnot Made(jill)\nnot Adducent(jill)\nTabularize(jill, jedediah)\nConstrue(jedediah, jill)\nScorbutic(jedediah)\nnot Amaurotic(jedediah)\nAdducent(jedediah)\nTabularize(jedediah, jill) and not Amaurotic(jedediah) -> Construe(jill, jedediah)\nforall x (Tabularize(x, jill) and not Gauffer(jill, jedediah) -> Construe(x, jedediah))\nforall x (Made(x) and Gauffer(x, jedediah) -> Construe(x, jedediah))\nforall x (Mercantile(x) -> Tabularize(x, jedediah))\nforall x (Gauffer(x, jill) and Construe(jill, jedediah) -> Tabularize(jedediah, jill))\nforall x (Construe(x, jedediah) -> Gauffer(jedediah, jill))\n\nTabularize(jedediah, jill)\n\nConstrue(jill, jedediah) and forall x (Construe(x, jedediah) -> Gauffer(jedediah, jill)) -> therefore Gauffer(jedediah, jill) Gauffer(jedediah, jill) and Construe(jill, jedediah) and forall x (Gauffer(x, jill) and Construe(jill, jedediah) -> Tabularize(jedediah, jill)) -> therefore Tabularize(jedediah, jill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The esta carbonate the evonne. The esta does not eat the evonne. The esta is chintzy. The esta is not decided. The esta is not hoary. The esta versify the evonne. The evonne carbonate the esta. The evonne is chintzy. The evonne is not gloved. The evonne is hoary. If the evonne versify the esta and the evonne is not gloved then the esta carbonate the evonne. If someone versify the esta and the esta does not eat the evonne then they chase the evonne. If someone is decided and they eat the evonne then they chase the evonne. If someone is ethnic then they need the evonne. If someone perk the esta and the esta carbonate the evonne then the evonne versify the esta. If someone carbonate the evonne then the evonne perk the esta. The evonne does not need the esta.", "logic": "\nCarbonate(esta, evonne)\nnot Perk(esta, evonne)\nChintzy(esta)\nnot Decided(esta)\nnot Hoary(esta)\nVersify(esta, evonne)\nCarbonate(evonne, esta)\nChintzy(evonne)\nnot Gloved(evonne)\nHoary(evonne)\nVersify(evonne, esta) and not Gloved(evonne) -> Carbonate(esta, evonne)\nforall x (Versify(x, esta) and not Perk(esta, evonne) -> Carbonate(x, evonne))\nforall x (Decided(x) and Perk(x, evonne) -> Carbonate(x, evonne))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) -> Versify(x, evonne))\nforall x (Perk(x, esta) and Carbonate(esta, evonne) -> Versify(evonne, esta))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, evonne) -> Perk(evonne, esta))\n\nnot Versify(evonne, esta)\n\nCarbonate(esta, evonne) and forall x (Carbonate(x, evonne) -> Perk(evonne, esta)) -> therefore Perk(evonne, esta) Perk(evonne, esta) and Carbonate(esta, evonne) and forall x (Perk(x, esta) and Carbonate(esta, evonne) -> Versify(evonne, esta)) -> therefore Versify(evonne, esta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The chandler discard the ingeberg. The chandler does not eat the ingeberg. The chandler is biovular. The chandler is not iatrogenic. The chandler is not risque. The chandler omit the ingeberg. The ingeberg discard the chandler. The ingeberg is biovular. The ingeberg is not elaborated. The ingeberg is risque. If the ingeberg omit the chandler and the ingeberg is not elaborated then the chandler discard the ingeberg. If someone omit the chandler and the chandler does not eat the ingeberg then they chase the ingeberg. If someone is iatrogenic and they eat the ingeberg then they chase the ingeberg. If someone is abroach then they need the ingeberg. If someone shark the chandler and the chandler discard the ingeberg then the ingeberg omit the chandler. If someone discard the ingeberg then the ingeberg shark the chandler. The ingeberg discard the ingeberg.", "logic": "\nDiscard(chandler, ingeberg)\nnot Shark(chandler, ingeberg)\nBiovular(chandler)\nnot Iatrogenic(chandler)\nnot Risque(chandler)\nOmit(chandler, ingeberg)\nDiscard(ingeberg, chandler)\nBiovular(ingeberg)\nnot Elaborated(ingeberg)\nRisque(ingeberg)\nOmit(ingeberg, chandler) and not Elaborated(ingeberg) -> Discard(chandler, ingeberg)\nforall x (Omit(x, chandler) and not Shark(chandler, ingeberg) -> Discard(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) and Shark(x, ingeberg) -> Discard(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Abroach(x) -> Omit(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Shark(x, chandler) and Discard(chandler, ingeberg) -> Omit(ingeberg, chandler))\nforall x (Discard(x, ingeberg) -> Shark(ingeberg, chandler))\n\nDiscard(ingeberg, ingeberg)\n\nDiscard(chandler, ingeberg) and forall x (Discard(x, ingeberg) -> Shark(ingeberg, chandler)) -> therefore Shark(ingeberg, chandler) Shark(ingeberg, chandler) and Discard(chandler, ingeberg) and forall x (Shark(x, chandler) and Discard(chandler, ingeberg) -> Omit(ingeberg, chandler)) -> therefore Omit(ingeberg, chandler) Omit(ingeberg, chandler) and not Shark(chandler, ingeberg) and forall x (Omit(x, chandler) and not Shark(chandler, ingeberg) -> Discard(x, ingeberg)) -> therefore Discard(ingeberg, ingeberg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The vince decolonize the ellwood. The vince does not eat the ellwood. The vince is unsealed. The vince is not hydroponic. The vince is not seamy. The vince spur the ellwood. The ellwood decolonize the vince. The ellwood is unsealed. The ellwood is not monthly. The ellwood is seamy. If the ellwood spur the vince and the ellwood is not monthly then the vince decolonize the ellwood. If someone spur the vince and the vince does not eat the ellwood then they chase the ellwood. If someone is hydroponic and they eat the ellwood then they chase the ellwood. If someone is detached then they need the ellwood. If someone straiten the vince and the vince decolonize the ellwood then the ellwood spur the vince. If someone decolonize the ellwood then the ellwood straiten the vince. The ellwood does not chase the ellwood.", "logic": "\nDecolonize(vince, ellwood)\nnot Straiten(vince, ellwood)\nUnsealed(vince)\nnot Hydroponic(vince)\nnot Seamy(vince)\nSpur(vince, ellwood)\nDecolonize(ellwood, vince)\nUnsealed(ellwood)\nnot Monthly(ellwood)\nSeamy(ellwood)\nSpur(ellwood, vince) and not Monthly(ellwood) -> Decolonize(vince, ellwood)\nforall x (Spur(x, vince) and not Straiten(vince, ellwood) -> Decolonize(x, ellwood))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) and Straiten(x, ellwood) -> Decolonize(x, ellwood))\nforall x (Detached(x) -> Spur(x, ellwood))\nforall x (Straiten(x, vince) and Decolonize(vince, ellwood) -> Spur(ellwood, vince))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, ellwood) -> Straiten(ellwood, vince))\n\nnot Decolonize(ellwood, ellwood)\n\nDecolonize(vince, ellwood) and forall x (Decolonize(x, ellwood) -> Straiten(ellwood, vince)) -> therefore Straiten(ellwood, vince) Straiten(ellwood, vince) and Decolonize(vince, ellwood) and forall x (Straiten(x, vince) and Decolonize(vince, ellwood) -> Spur(ellwood, vince)) -> therefore Spur(ellwood, vince) Spur(ellwood, vince) and not Straiten(vince, ellwood) and forall x (Spur(x, vince) and not Straiten(vince, ellwood) -> Decolonize(x, ellwood)) -> therefore Decolonize(ellwood, ellwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The emanuel osculate the elisabet. The emanuel does not eat the elisabet. The emanuel is nutty. The emanuel is not bustling. The emanuel is not disclike. The emanuel thunder the elisabet. The elisabet osculate the emanuel. The elisabet is nutty. The elisabet is not acold. The elisabet is disclike. If the elisabet thunder the emanuel and the elisabet is not acold then the emanuel osculate the elisabet. If someone thunder the emanuel and the emanuel does not eat the elisabet then they chase the elisabet. If someone is bustling and they eat the elisabet then they chase the elisabet. If someone is nonmusical then they need the elisabet. If someone tremor the emanuel and the emanuel osculate the elisabet then the elisabet thunder the emanuel. If someone osculate the elisabet then the elisabet tremor the emanuel. The elisabet does not need the elisabet.", "logic": "\nOsculate(emanuel, elisabet)\nnot Tremor(emanuel, elisabet)\nNutty(emanuel)\nnot Bustling(emanuel)\nnot Disclike(emanuel)\nThunder(emanuel, elisabet)\nOsculate(elisabet, emanuel)\nNutty(elisabet)\nnot Acold(elisabet)\nDisclike(elisabet)\nThunder(elisabet, emanuel) and not Acold(elisabet) -> Osculate(emanuel, elisabet)\nforall x (Thunder(x, emanuel) and not Tremor(emanuel, elisabet) -> Osculate(x, elisabet))\nforall x (Bustling(x) and Tremor(x, elisabet) -> Osculate(x, elisabet))\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) -> Thunder(x, elisabet))\nforall x (Tremor(x, emanuel) and Osculate(emanuel, elisabet) -> Thunder(elisabet, emanuel))\nforall x (Osculate(x, elisabet) -> Tremor(elisabet, emanuel))\n\nnot Thunder(elisabet, elisabet)\n\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) -> Thunder(x, elisabet)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The prince pierce the jordan. The prince does not eat the jordan. The prince is fabled. The prince is not unmovable. The prince is not upstanding. The prince lisp the jordan. The jordan pierce the prince. The jordan is fabled. The jordan is not asian. The jordan is upstanding. If the jordan lisp the prince and the jordan is not asian then the prince pierce the jordan. If someone lisp the prince and the prince does not eat the jordan then they chase the jordan. If someone is unmovable and they eat the jordan then they chase the jordan. If someone is icelandic then they need the jordan. If someone suds the prince and the prince pierce the jordan then the jordan lisp the prince. If someone pierce the jordan then the jordan suds the prince. The prince suds the prince.", "logic": "\nPierce(prince, jordan)\nnot Suds(prince, jordan)\nFabled(prince)\nnot Unmovable(prince)\nnot Upstanding(prince)\nLisp(prince, jordan)\nPierce(jordan, prince)\nFabled(jordan)\nnot Asian(jordan)\nUpstanding(jordan)\nLisp(jordan, prince) and not Asian(jordan) -> Pierce(prince, jordan)\nforall x (Lisp(x, prince) and not Suds(prince, jordan) -> Pierce(x, jordan))\nforall x (Unmovable(x) and Suds(x, jordan) -> Pierce(x, jordan))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) -> Lisp(x, jordan))\nforall x (Suds(x, prince) and Pierce(prince, jordan) -> Lisp(jordan, prince))\nforall x (Pierce(x, jordan) -> Suds(jordan, prince))\n\nSuds(prince, prince)\n\nSuds(prince, prince) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The hewe dash the sallie. The hewe does not eat the sallie. The hewe is imposing. The hewe is not tangy. The hewe is not unspotted. The hewe satiate the sallie. The sallie dash the hewe. The sallie is imposing. The sallie is not tamable. The sallie is unspotted. If the sallie satiate the hewe and the sallie is not tamable then the hewe dash the sallie. If someone satiate the hewe and the hewe does not eat the sallie then they chase the sallie. If someone is tangy and they eat the sallie then they chase the sallie. If someone is friable then they need the sallie. If someone bank the hewe and the hewe dash the sallie then the sallie satiate the hewe. If someone dash the sallie then the sallie bank the hewe. The hewe does not chase the hewe.", "logic": "\nDash(hewe, sallie)\nnot Bank(hewe, sallie)\nImposing(hewe)\nnot Tangy(hewe)\nnot Unspotted(hewe)\nSatiate(hewe, sallie)\nDash(sallie, hewe)\nImposing(sallie)\nnot Tamable(sallie)\nUnspotted(sallie)\nSatiate(sallie, hewe) and not Tamable(sallie) -> Dash(hewe, sallie)\nforall x (Satiate(x, hewe) and not Bank(hewe, sallie) -> Dash(x, sallie))\nforall x (Tangy(x) and Bank(x, sallie) -> Dash(x, sallie))\nforall x (Friable(x) -> Satiate(x, sallie))\nforall x (Bank(x, hewe) and Dash(hewe, sallie) -> Satiate(sallie, hewe))\nforall x (Dash(x, sallie) -> Bank(sallie, hewe))\n\nnot Dash(hewe, hewe)\n\nnot Dash(hewe, hewe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The gerianne want the kellyann. The gerianne does not eat the kellyann. The gerianne is dominican. The gerianne is not minuscular. The gerianne is not combustive. The gerianne detox the kellyann. The kellyann want the gerianne. The kellyann is dominican. The kellyann is not pugnacious. The kellyann is combustive. If the kellyann detox the gerianne and the kellyann is not pugnacious then the gerianne want the kellyann. If someone detox the gerianne and the gerianne does not eat the kellyann then they chase the kellyann. If someone is minuscular and they eat the kellyann then they chase the kellyann. If someone is allegretto then they need the kellyann. If someone loft the gerianne and the gerianne want the kellyann then the kellyann detox the gerianne. If someone want the kellyann then the kellyann loft the gerianne. The kellyann is allegretto.", "logic": "\nWant(gerianne, kellyann)\nnot Loft(gerianne, kellyann)\nDominican(gerianne)\nnot Minuscular(gerianne)\nnot Combustive(gerianne)\nDetox(gerianne, kellyann)\nWant(kellyann, gerianne)\nDominican(kellyann)\nnot Pugnacious(kellyann)\nCombustive(kellyann)\nDetox(kellyann, gerianne) and not Pugnacious(kellyann) -> Want(gerianne, kellyann)\nforall x (Detox(x, gerianne) and not Loft(gerianne, kellyann) -> Want(x, kellyann))\nforall x (Minuscular(x) and Loft(x, kellyann) -> Want(x, kellyann))\nforall x (Allegretto(x) -> Detox(x, kellyann))\nforall x (Loft(x, gerianne) and Want(gerianne, kellyann) -> Detox(kellyann, gerianne))\nforall x (Want(x, kellyann) -> Loft(kellyann, gerianne))\n\nAllegretto(kellyann)\n\nAllegretto(kellyann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The thacher decontrol the sidnee. The thacher does not eat the sidnee. The thacher is paraguayan. The thacher is not defective. The thacher is not stolid. The thacher furbish the sidnee. The sidnee decontrol the thacher. The sidnee is paraguayan. The sidnee is not imbalanced. The sidnee is stolid. If the sidnee furbish the thacher and the sidnee is not imbalanced then the thacher decontrol the sidnee. If someone furbish the thacher and the thacher does not eat the sidnee then they chase the sidnee. If someone is defective and they eat the sidnee then they chase the sidnee. If someone is evaporated then they need the sidnee. If someone crenel the thacher and the thacher decontrol the sidnee then the sidnee furbish the thacher. If someone decontrol the sidnee then the sidnee crenel the thacher. The thacher is not evaporated.", "logic": "\nDecontrol(thacher, sidnee)\nnot Crenel(thacher, sidnee)\nParaguayan(thacher)\nnot Defective(thacher)\nnot Stolid(thacher)\nFurbish(thacher, sidnee)\nDecontrol(sidnee, thacher)\nParaguayan(sidnee)\nnot Imbalanced(sidnee)\nStolid(sidnee)\nFurbish(sidnee, thacher) and not Imbalanced(sidnee) -> Decontrol(thacher, sidnee)\nforall x (Furbish(x, thacher) and not Crenel(thacher, sidnee) -> Decontrol(x, sidnee))\nforall x (Defective(x) and Crenel(x, sidnee) -> Decontrol(x, sidnee))\nforall x (Evaporated(x) -> Furbish(x, sidnee))\nforall x (Crenel(x, thacher) and Decontrol(thacher, sidnee) -> Furbish(sidnee, thacher))\nforall x (Decontrol(x, sidnee) -> Crenel(sidnee, thacher))\n\nnot Evaporated(thacher)\n\nnot Evaporated(thacher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The lebbie wend the cheston. The lebbie does not eat the cheston. The lebbie is somber. The lebbie is not eight. The lebbie is not bastioned. The lebbie debug the cheston. The cheston wend the lebbie. The cheston is somber. The cheston is not able. The cheston is bastioned. If the cheston debug the lebbie and the cheston is not able then the lebbie wend the cheston. If someone debug the lebbie and the lebbie does not eat the cheston then they chase the cheston. If someone is eight and they eat the cheston then they chase the cheston. If someone is topical then they need the cheston. If someone vouchsafe the lebbie and the lebbie wend the cheston then the cheston debug the lebbie. If someone wend the cheston then the cheston vouchsafe the lebbie. The lebbie is able.", "logic": "\nWend(lebbie, cheston)\nnot Vouchsafe(lebbie, cheston)\nSomber(lebbie)\nnot Eight(lebbie)\nnot Bastioned(lebbie)\nDebug(lebbie, cheston)\nWend(cheston, lebbie)\nSomber(cheston)\nnot Able(cheston)\nBastioned(cheston)\nDebug(cheston, lebbie) and not Able(cheston) -> Wend(lebbie, cheston)\nforall x (Debug(x, lebbie) and not Vouchsafe(lebbie, cheston) -> Wend(x, cheston))\nforall x (Eight(x) and Vouchsafe(x, cheston) -> Wend(x, cheston))\nforall x (Topical(x) -> Debug(x, cheston))\nforall x (Vouchsafe(x, lebbie) and Wend(lebbie, cheston) -> Debug(cheston, lebbie))\nforall x (Wend(x, cheston) -> Vouchsafe(cheston, lebbie))\n\nAble(lebbie)\n\nAble(lebbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The torey inculcate the ally. The torey does not eat the ally. The torey is airless. The torey is not deductible. The torey is not untried. The torey subtract the ally. The ally inculcate the torey. The ally is airless. The ally is not stock. The ally is untried. If the ally subtract the torey and the ally is not stock then the torey inculcate the ally. If someone subtract the torey and the torey does not eat the ally then they chase the ally. If someone is deductible and they eat the ally then they chase the ally. If someone is sacral then they need the ally. If someone entreat the torey and the torey inculcate the ally then the ally subtract the torey. If someone inculcate the ally then the ally entreat the torey. The ally is not deductible.", "logic": "\nInculcate(torey, ally)\nnot Entreat(torey, ally)\nAirless(torey)\nnot Deductible(torey)\nnot Untried(torey)\nSubtract(torey, ally)\nInculcate(ally, torey)\nAirless(ally)\nnot Stock(ally)\nUntried(ally)\nSubtract(ally, torey) and not Stock(ally) -> Inculcate(torey, ally)\nforall x (Subtract(x, torey) and not Entreat(torey, ally) -> Inculcate(x, ally))\nforall x (Deductible(x) and Entreat(x, ally) -> Inculcate(x, ally))\nforall x (Sacral(x) -> Subtract(x, ally))\nforall x (Entreat(x, torey) and Inculcate(torey, ally) -> Subtract(ally, torey))\nforall x (Inculcate(x, ally) -> Entreat(ally, torey))\n\nnot Deductible(ally)\n\nnot Deductible(ally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The kettie erect the susann. The kettie does not eat the susann. The kettie is cordial. The kettie is not vindictive. The kettie is not cypriote. The kettie convulse the susann. The susann erect the kettie. The susann is cordial. The susann is not umteenth. The susann is cypriote. If the susann convulse the kettie and the susann is not umteenth then the kettie erect the susann. If someone convulse the kettie and the kettie does not eat the susann then they chase the susann. If someone is vindictive and they eat the susann then they chase the susann. If someone is bastardly then they need the susann. If someone cinematise the kettie and the kettie erect the susann then the susann convulse the kettie. If someone erect the susann then the susann cinematise the kettie. The susann cinematise the susann.", "logic": "\nErect(kettie, susann)\nnot Cinematise(kettie, susann)\nCordial(kettie)\nnot Vindictive(kettie)\nnot Cypriote(kettie)\nConvulse(kettie, susann)\nErect(susann, kettie)\nCordial(susann)\nnot Umteenth(susann)\nCypriote(susann)\nConvulse(susann, kettie) and not Umteenth(susann) -> Erect(kettie, susann)\nforall x (Convulse(x, kettie) and not Cinematise(kettie, susann) -> Erect(x, susann))\nforall x (Vindictive(x) and Cinematise(x, susann) -> Erect(x, susann))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> Convulse(x, susann))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, kettie) and Erect(kettie, susann) -> Convulse(susann, kettie))\nforall x (Erect(x, susann) -> Cinematise(susann, kettie))\n\nCinematise(susann, susann)\n\nCinematise(susann, susann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The witty glue the brice. The brice is authorial. If someone glue the brice then the brice glue the witty. If someone combust the brice then the brice combust the witty. If someone glue the witty then the witty does not visit the brice. If someone is authorial then they do not chase the witty. If someone throb the brice then the brice is broiled. If someone is authorial and they like the witty then the witty is authorial. The witty glue the brice.", "logic": "\nGlue(witty, brice)\nAuthorial(brice)\nforall x (Glue(x, brice) -> Glue(brice, witty))\nforall x (Combust(x, brice) -> Combust(brice, witty))\nforall x (Glue(x, witty) -> not Combust(witty, brice))\nforall x (Authorial(x) -> not Throb(x, witty))\nforall x (Throb(x, brice) -> Broiled(brice))\nforall x (Authorial(x) and Glue(x, witty) -> Authorial(witty))\n\nGlue(witty, brice)\n\ntherefore Glue(witty, brice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The yacov whirligig the rosanne. The rosanne is photic. If someone whirligig the rosanne then the rosanne whirligig the yacov. If someone shank the rosanne then the rosanne shank the yacov. If someone whirligig the yacov then the yacov does not visit the rosanne. If someone is photic then they do not chase the yacov. If someone shipwreck the rosanne then the rosanne is fraught. If someone is photic and they like the yacov then the yacov is photic. The rosanne is not photic.", "logic": "\nWhirligig(yacov, rosanne)\nPhotic(rosanne)\nforall x (Whirligig(x, rosanne) -> Whirligig(rosanne, yacov))\nforall x (Shank(x, rosanne) -> Shank(rosanne, yacov))\nforall x (Whirligig(x, yacov) -> not Shank(yacov, rosanne))\nforall x (Photic(x) -> not Shipwreck(x, yacov))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, rosanne) -> Fraught(rosanne))\nforall x (Photic(x) and Whirligig(x, yacov) -> Photic(yacov))\n\nnot Photic(rosanne)\n\ntherefore Photic(rosanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The catlee hijack the rosemary. The rosemary is hypethral. If someone hijack the rosemary then the rosemary hijack the catlee. If someone imbrue the rosemary then the rosemary imbrue the catlee. If someone hijack the catlee then the catlee does not visit the rosemary. If someone is hypethral then they do not chase the catlee. If someone step the rosemary then the rosemary is unprepared. If someone is hypethral and they like the catlee then the catlee is hypethral. The rosemary does not chase the catlee.", "logic": "\nHijack(catlee, rosemary)\nHypethral(rosemary)\nforall x (Hijack(x, rosemary) -> Hijack(rosemary, catlee))\nforall x (Imbrue(x, rosemary) -> Imbrue(rosemary, catlee))\nforall x (Hijack(x, catlee) -> not Imbrue(catlee, rosemary))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> not Step(x, catlee))\nforall x (Step(x, rosemary) -> Unprepared(rosemary))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) and Hijack(x, catlee) -> Hypethral(catlee))\n\nnot Step(rosemary, catlee)\n\nHypethral(rosemary) and forall x (Hypethral(x) -> not Step(x, catlee)) -> therefore not Step(rosemary, catlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The alonso atomize the tibold. The tibold is wayfaring. If someone atomize the tibold then the tibold atomize the alonso. If someone belay the tibold then the tibold belay the alonso. If someone atomize the alonso then the alonso does not visit the tibold. If someone is wayfaring then they do not chase the alonso. If someone dress the tibold then the tibold is paschal. If someone is wayfaring and they like the alonso then the alonso is wayfaring. The tibold does not like the alonso.", "logic": "\nAtomize(alonso, tibold)\nWayfaring(tibold)\nforall x (Atomize(x, tibold) -> Atomize(tibold, alonso))\nforall x (Belay(x, tibold) -> Belay(tibold, alonso))\nforall x (Atomize(x, alonso) -> not Belay(alonso, tibold))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) -> not Dress(x, alonso))\nforall x (Dress(x, tibold) -> Paschal(tibold))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) and Atomize(x, alonso) -> Wayfaring(alonso))\n\nnot Atomize(tibold, alonso)\n\nAtomize(alonso, tibold) and forall x (Atomize(x, tibold) -> Atomize(tibold, alonso)) -> therefore Atomize(tibold, alonso)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The sileas reprocess the annalyse. The annalyse is bastioned. If someone reprocess the annalyse then the annalyse reprocess the sileas. If someone distemper the annalyse then the annalyse distemper the sileas. If someone reprocess the sileas then the sileas does not visit the annalyse. If someone is bastioned then they do not chase the sileas. If someone spearhead the annalyse then the annalyse is blithe. If someone is bastioned and they like the sileas then the sileas is bastioned. The sileas is bastioned.", "logic": "\nReprocess(sileas, annalyse)\nBastioned(annalyse)\nforall x (Reprocess(x, annalyse) -> Reprocess(annalyse, sileas))\nforall x (Distemper(x, annalyse) -> Distemper(annalyse, sileas))\nforall x (Reprocess(x, sileas) -> not Distemper(sileas, annalyse))\nforall x (Bastioned(x) -> not Spearhead(x, sileas))\nforall x (Spearhead(x, annalyse) -> Blithe(annalyse))\nforall x (Bastioned(x) and Reprocess(x, sileas) -> Bastioned(sileas))\n\nBastioned(sileas)\n\nReprocess(sileas, annalyse) and forall x (Reprocess(x, annalyse) -> Reprocess(annalyse, sileas)) -> therefore Reprocess(annalyse, sileas) Bastioned(annalyse) and Reprocess(annalyse, sileas) and forall x (Bastioned(x) and Reprocess(x, sileas) -> Bastioned(sileas)) -> therefore Bastioned(sileas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The kent whicker the hudson. The hudson is southerly. If someone whicker the hudson then the hudson whicker the kent. If someone stripe the hudson then the hudson stripe the kent. If someone whicker the kent then the kent does not visit the hudson. If someone is southerly then they do not chase the kent. If someone damp the hudson then the hudson is papillose. If someone is southerly and they like the kent then the kent is southerly. The kent is not southerly.", "logic": "\nWhicker(kent, hudson)\nSoutherly(hudson)\nforall x (Whicker(x, hudson) -> Whicker(hudson, kent))\nforall x (Stripe(x, hudson) -> Stripe(hudson, kent))\nforall x (Whicker(x, kent) -> not Stripe(kent, hudson))\nforall x (Southerly(x) -> not Damp(x, kent))\nforall x (Damp(x, hudson) -> Papillose(hudson))\nforall x (Southerly(x) and Whicker(x, kent) -> Southerly(kent))\n\nnot Southerly(kent)\n\nWhicker(kent, hudson) and forall x (Whicker(x, hudson) -> Whicker(hudson, kent)) -> therefore Whicker(hudson, kent) Southerly(hudson) and Whicker(hudson, kent) and forall x (Southerly(x) and Whicker(x, kent) -> Southerly(kent)) -> therefore Southerly(kent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The kesley catabolize the gwendolin. The gwendolin is synthetic. If someone catabolize the gwendolin then the gwendolin catabolize the kesley. If someone condole the gwendolin then the gwendolin condole the kesley. If someone catabolize the kesley then the kesley does not visit the gwendolin. If someone is synthetic then they do not chase the kesley. If someone reshape the gwendolin then the gwendolin is recreant. If someone is synthetic and they like the kesley then the kesley is synthetic. The kesley does not chase the kesley.", "logic": "\nCatabolize(kesley, gwendolin)\nSynthetic(gwendolin)\nforall x (Catabolize(x, gwendolin) -> Catabolize(gwendolin, kesley))\nforall x (Condole(x, gwendolin) -> Condole(gwendolin, kesley))\nforall x (Catabolize(x, kesley) -> not Condole(kesley, gwendolin))\nforall x (Synthetic(x) -> not Reshape(x, kesley))\nforall x (Reshape(x, gwendolin) -> Recreant(gwendolin))\nforall x (Synthetic(x) and Catabolize(x, kesley) -> Synthetic(kesley))\n\nnot Reshape(kesley, kesley)\n\nCatabolize(kesley, gwendolin) and forall x (Catabolize(x, gwendolin) -> Catabolize(gwendolin, kesley)) -> therefore Catabolize(gwendolin, kesley) Synthetic(gwendolin) and Catabolize(gwendolin, kesley) and forall x (Synthetic(x) and Catabolize(x, kesley) -> Synthetic(kesley)) -> therefore Synthetic(kesley) Synthetic(kesley) and forall x (Synthetic(x) -> not Reshape(x, kesley)) -> therefore not Reshape(kesley, kesley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The artur derate the darrick. The darrick is discordant. If someone derate the darrick then the darrick derate the artur. If someone impregnate the darrick then the darrick impregnate the artur. If someone derate the artur then the artur does not visit the darrick. If someone is discordant then they do not chase the artur. If someone snipe the darrick then the darrick is choleric. If someone is discordant and they like the artur then the artur is discordant. The artur snipe the artur.", "logic": "\nDerate(artur, darrick)\nDiscordant(darrick)\nforall x (Derate(x, darrick) -> Derate(darrick, artur))\nforall x (Impregnate(x, darrick) -> Impregnate(darrick, artur))\nforall x (Derate(x, artur) -> not Impregnate(artur, darrick))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> not Snipe(x, artur))\nforall x (Snipe(x, darrick) -> Choleric(darrick))\nforall x (Discordant(x) and Derate(x, artur) -> Discordant(artur))\n\nSnipe(artur, artur)\n\nDerate(artur, darrick) and forall x (Derate(x, darrick) -> Derate(darrick, artur)) -> therefore Derate(darrick, artur) Discordant(darrick) and Derate(darrick, artur) and forall x (Discordant(x) and Derate(x, artur) -> Discordant(artur)) -> therefore Discordant(artur) Discordant(artur) and forall x (Discordant(x) -> not Snipe(x, artur)) -> therefore not Snipe(artur, artur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The pauletta waggle the finn. The finn is socialist. If someone waggle the finn then the finn waggle the pauletta. If someone flavour the finn then the finn flavour the pauletta. If someone waggle the pauletta then the pauletta does not visit the finn. If someone is socialist then they do not chase the pauletta. If someone pompadour the finn then the finn is unwritten. If someone is socialist and they like the pauletta then the pauletta is socialist. The finn does not visit the pauletta.", "logic": "\nWaggle(pauletta, finn)\nSocialist(finn)\nforall x (Waggle(x, finn) -> Waggle(finn, pauletta))\nforall x (Flavour(x, finn) -> Flavour(finn, pauletta))\nforall x (Waggle(x, pauletta) -> not Flavour(pauletta, finn))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> not Pompadour(x, pauletta))\nforall x (Pompadour(x, finn) -> Unwritten(finn))\nforall x (Socialist(x) and Waggle(x, pauletta) -> Socialist(pauletta))\n\nnot Flavour(finn, pauletta)\n\nforall x (Flavour(x, finn) -> Flavour(finn, pauletta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The carita lavish the rosalie. The rosalie is lenient. If someone lavish the rosalie then the rosalie lavish the carita. If someone forewarn the rosalie then the rosalie forewarn the carita. If someone lavish the carita then the carita does not visit the rosalie. If someone is lenient then they do not chase the carita. If someone politicise the rosalie then the rosalie is marital. If someone is lenient and they like the carita then the carita is lenient. The rosalie is marital.", "logic": "\nLavish(carita, rosalie)\nLenient(rosalie)\nforall x (Lavish(x, rosalie) -> Lavish(rosalie, carita))\nforall x (Forewarn(x, rosalie) -> Forewarn(rosalie, carita))\nforall x (Lavish(x, carita) -> not Forewarn(carita, rosalie))\nforall x (Lenient(x) -> not Politicise(x, carita))\nforall x (Politicise(x, rosalie) -> Marital(rosalie))\nforall x (Lenient(x) and Lavish(x, carita) -> Lenient(carita))\n\nMarital(rosalie)\n\nforall x (Politicise(x, rosalie) -> Marital(rosalie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The rodney horn the letti. The letti is inveterate. If someone horn the letti then the letti horn the rodney. If someone revere the letti then the letti revere the rodney. If someone horn the rodney then the rodney does not visit the letti. If someone is inveterate then they do not chase the rodney. If someone prostitute the letti then the letti is ladylike. If someone is inveterate and they like the rodney then the rodney is inveterate. The rodney is not rough.", "logic": "\nHorn(rodney, letti)\nInveterate(letti)\nforall x (Horn(x, letti) -> Horn(letti, rodney))\nforall x (Revere(x, letti) -> Revere(letti, rodney))\nforall x (Horn(x, rodney) -> not Revere(rodney, letti))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> not Prostitute(x, rodney))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, letti) -> Ladylike(letti))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) and Horn(x, rodney) -> Inveterate(rodney))\n\nnot Rough(rodney)\n\nnot Rough(rodney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The gratiana discommode the billy. The billy is cashed. If someone discommode the billy then the billy discommode the gratiana. If someone thoriate the billy then the billy thoriate the gratiana. If someone discommode the gratiana then the gratiana does not visit the billy. If someone is cashed then they do not chase the gratiana. If someone writhe the billy then the billy is comfy. If someone is cashed and they like the gratiana then the gratiana is cashed. The billy thoriate the billy.", "logic": "\nDiscommode(gratiana, billy)\nCashed(billy)\nforall x (Discommode(x, billy) -> Discommode(billy, gratiana))\nforall x (Thoriate(x, billy) -> Thoriate(billy, gratiana))\nforall x (Discommode(x, gratiana) -> not Thoriate(gratiana, billy))\nforall x (Cashed(x) -> not Writhe(x, gratiana))\nforall x (Writhe(x, billy) -> Comfy(billy))\nforall x (Cashed(x) and Discommode(x, gratiana) -> Cashed(gratiana))\n\nThoriate(billy, billy)\n\nThoriate(billy, billy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The kelcie shellack the graehme. The graehme is mislaid. If someone shellack the graehme then the graehme shellack the kelcie. If someone restate the graehme then the graehme restate the kelcie. If someone shellack the kelcie then the kelcie does not visit the graehme. If someone is mislaid then they do not chase the kelcie. If someone roughcast the graehme then the graehme is diametric. If someone is mislaid and they like the kelcie then the kelcie is mislaid. The graehme is not rough.", "logic": "\nShellack(kelcie, graehme)\nMislaid(graehme)\nforall x (Shellack(x, graehme) -> Shellack(graehme, kelcie))\nforall x (Restate(x, graehme) -> Restate(graehme, kelcie))\nforall x (Shellack(x, kelcie) -> not Restate(kelcie, graehme))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> not Roughcast(x, kelcie))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, graehme) -> Diametric(graehme))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) and Shellack(x, kelcie) -> Mislaid(kelcie))\n\nnot Rough(graehme)\n\nnot Rough(graehme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The dixie disagree the calypso. The calypso is hopeful. If someone disagree the calypso then the calypso disagree the dixie. If someone tree the calypso then the calypso tree the dixie. If someone disagree the dixie then the dixie does not visit the calypso. If someone is hopeful then they do not chase the dixie. If someone posture the calypso then the calypso is required. If someone is hopeful and they like the dixie then the dixie is hopeful. The dixie posture the calypso.", "logic": "\nDisagree(dixie, calypso)\nHopeful(calypso)\nforall x (Disagree(x, calypso) -> Disagree(calypso, dixie))\nforall x (Tree(x, calypso) -> Tree(calypso, dixie))\nforall x (Disagree(x, dixie) -> not Tree(dixie, calypso))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) -> not Posture(x, dixie))\nforall x (Posture(x, calypso) -> Required(calypso))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) and Disagree(x, dixie) -> Hopeful(dixie))\n\nPosture(dixie, calypso)\n\nPosture(dixie, calypso) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The dyan power the muhammad. The muhammad is vertical. If someone power the muhammad then the muhammad power the dyan. If someone gabble the muhammad then the muhammad gabble the dyan. If someone power the dyan then the dyan does not visit the muhammad. If someone is vertical then they do not chase the dyan. If someone subvert the muhammad then the muhammad is jawed. If someone is vertical and they like the dyan then the dyan is vertical. The dyan is not jawed.", "logic": "\nPower(dyan, muhammad)\nVertical(muhammad)\nforall x (Power(x, muhammad) -> Power(muhammad, dyan))\nforall x (Gabble(x, muhammad) -> Gabble(muhammad, dyan))\nforall x (Power(x, dyan) -> not Gabble(dyan, muhammad))\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> not Subvert(x, dyan))\nforall x (Subvert(x, muhammad) -> Jawed(muhammad))\nforall x (Vertical(x) and Power(x, dyan) -> Vertical(dyan))\n\nnot Jawed(dyan)\n\nnot Jawed(dyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The flem evidence the aditya. The aditya is wistful. If someone evidence the aditya then the aditya evidence the flem. If someone blog the aditya then the aditya blog the flem. If someone evidence the flem then the flem does not visit the aditya. If someone is wistful then they do not chase the flem. If someone levitate the aditya then the aditya is poignant. If someone is wistful and they like the flem then the flem is wistful. The flem blog the flem.", "logic": "\nEvidence(flem, aditya)\nWistful(aditya)\nforall x (Evidence(x, aditya) -> Evidence(aditya, flem))\nforall x (Blog(x, aditya) -> Blog(aditya, flem))\nforall x (Evidence(x, flem) -> not Blog(flem, aditya))\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> not Levitate(x, flem))\nforall x (Levitate(x, aditya) -> Poignant(aditya))\nforall x (Wistful(x) and Evidence(x, flem) -> Wistful(flem))\n\nBlog(flem, flem)\n\nBlog(flem, flem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "Joao is curtal. Joao is braced. Joao is coenobitic. Wells is aurous. Wells is landless. Wells is curtal. Wells is braced. Wells is implanted. Odille is aurous. Odille is landless. Odille is curtal. Odille is braced. Odille is unitary. Odille is implanted. Odille is coenobitic. All curtal, braced things are unitary. If something is unitary then it is coenobitic. If something is implanted and aurous then it is braced. If something is braced then it is aurous. All aurous, braced things are implanted. All landless, coenobitic things are curtal. All unitary things are curtal. If Joao is coenobitic and Joao is implanted then Joao is landless. Wells is implanted.", "logic": "\nCurtal(joao)\nBraced(joao)\nCoenobitic(joao)\nAurous(wells)\nLandless(wells)\nCurtal(wells)\nBraced(wells)\nImplanted(wells)\nAurous(odille)\nLandless(odille)\nCurtal(odille)\nBraced(odille)\nUnitary(odille)\nImplanted(odille)\nCoenobitic(odille)\nforall x (Curtal(x) and Braced(x) -> Unitary(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nforall x (Implanted(x) and Aurous(x) -> Braced(x))\nforall x (Braced(x) -> Aurous(x))\nforall x (Aurous(x) and Braced(x) -> Implanted(x))\nforall x (Landless(x) and Coenobitic(x) -> Curtal(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Curtal(x))\nCoenobitic(joao) and Implanted(joao) -> Landless(joao)\n\nImplanted(wells)\n\ntherefore Implanted(wells)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Melosa is diabolical. Melosa is geodetic. Melosa is bipinnate. Gracie is carnation. Gracie is eldest. Gracie is diabolical. Gracie is geodetic. Gracie is galilaean. Margaux is carnation. Margaux is eldest. Margaux is diabolical. Margaux is geodetic. Margaux is xxxviii. Margaux is galilaean. Margaux is bipinnate. All diabolical, geodetic things are xxxviii. If something is xxxviii then it is bipinnate. If something is galilaean and carnation then it is geodetic. If something is geodetic then it is carnation. All carnation, geodetic things are galilaean. All eldest, bipinnate things are diabolical. All xxxviii things are diabolical. If Melosa is bipinnate and Melosa is galilaean then Melosa is eldest. Gracie is not carnation.", "logic": "\nDiabolical(melosa)\nGeodetic(melosa)\nBipinnate(melosa)\nCarnation(gracie)\nEldest(gracie)\nDiabolical(gracie)\nGeodetic(gracie)\nGalilaean(gracie)\nCarnation(margaux)\nEldest(margaux)\nDiabolical(margaux)\nGeodetic(margaux)\nXxxviii(margaux)\nGalilaean(margaux)\nBipinnate(margaux)\nforall x (Diabolical(x) and Geodetic(x) -> Xxxviii(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Bipinnate(x))\nforall x (Galilaean(x) and Carnation(x) -> Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> Carnation(x))\nforall x (Carnation(x) and Geodetic(x) -> Galilaean(x))\nforall x (Eldest(x) and Bipinnate(x) -> Diabolical(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Diabolical(x))\nBipinnate(melosa) and Galilaean(melosa) -> Eldest(melosa)\n\nnot Carnation(gracie)\n\ntherefore Carnation(gracie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Gere is petty. Gere is curtal. Gere is edifying. Fabian is sumptuous. Fabian is nautical. Fabian is petty. Fabian is curtal. Fabian is stinting. Benton is sumptuous. Benton is nautical. Benton is petty. Benton is curtal. Benton is unstinting. Benton is stinting. Benton is edifying. All petty, curtal things are unstinting. If something is unstinting then it is edifying. If something is stinting and sumptuous then it is curtal. If something is curtal then it is sumptuous. All sumptuous, curtal things are stinting. All nautical, edifying things are petty. All unstinting things are petty. If Gere is edifying and Gere is stinting then Gere is nautical. Gere is unstinting.", "logic": "\nPetty(gere)\nCurtal(gere)\nEdifying(gere)\nSumptuous(fabian)\nNautical(fabian)\nPetty(fabian)\nCurtal(fabian)\nStinting(fabian)\nSumptuous(benton)\nNautical(benton)\nPetty(benton)\nCurtal(benton)\nUnstinting(benton)\nStinting(benton)\nEdifying(benton)\nforall x (Petty(x) and Curtal(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Stinting(x) and Sumptuous(x) -> Curtal(x))\nforall x (Curtal(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) and Curtal(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and Edifying(x) -> Petty(x))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Petty(x))\nEdifying(gere) and Stinting(gere) -> Nautical(gere)\n\nUnstinting(gere)\n\nPetty(gere) and Curtal(gere) and forall x (Petty(x) and Curtal(x) -> Unstinting(x)) -> therefore Unstinting(gere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Webster is damning. Webster is earthborn. Webster is conjoint. Marna is handelian. Marna is faucal. Marna is damning. Marna is earthborn. Marna is perturbing. Standford is handelian. Standford is faucal. Standford is damning. Standford is earthborn. Standford is ungarbed. Standford is perturbing. Standford is conjoint. All damning, earthborn things are ungarbed. If something is ungarbed then it is conjoint. If something is perturbing and handelian then it is earthborn. If something is earthborn then it is handelian. All handelian, earthborn things are perturbing. All faucal, conjoint things are damning. All ungarbed things are damning. If Webster is conjoint and Webster is perturbing then Webster is faucal. Webster is not ungarbed.", "logic": "\nDamning(webster)\nEarthborn(webster)\nConjoint(webster)\nHandelian(marna)\nFaucal(marna)\nDamning(marna)\nEarthborn(marna)\nPerturbing(marna)\nHandelian(standford)\nFaucal(standford)\nDamning(standford)\nEarthborn(standford)\nUngarbed(standford)\nPerturbing(standford)\nConjoint(standford)\nforall x (Damning(x) and Earthborn(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Conjoint(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) and Handelian(x) -> Earthborn(x))\nforall x (Earthborn(x) -> Handelian(x))\nforall x (Handelian(x) and Earthborn(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nforall x (Faucal(x) and Conjoint(x) -> Damning(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Damning(x))\nConjoint(webster) and Perturbing(webster) -> Faucal(webster)\n\nnot Ungarbed(webster)\n\nDamning(webster) and Earthborn(webster) and forall x (Damning(x) and Earthborn(x) -> Ungarbed(x)) -> therefore Ungarbed(webster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Madelene is judicable. Madelene is clubfooted. Madelene is interbred. Ilene is increased. Ilene is intoxicant. Ilene is judicable. Ilene is clubfooted. Ilene is bellicose. Clemente is increased. Clemente is intoxicant. Clemente is judicable. Clemente is clubfooted. Clemente is bonkers. Clemente is bellicose. Clemente is interbred. All judicable, clubfooted things are bonkers. If something is bonkers then it is interbred. If something is bellicose and increased then it is clubfooted. If something is clubfooted then it is increased. All increased, clubfooted things are bellicose. All intoxicant, interbred things are judicable. All bonkers things are judicable. If Madelene is interbred and Madelene is bellicose then Madelene is intoxicant. Madelene is bellicose.", "logic": "\nJudicable(madelene)\nClubfooted(madelene)\nInterbred(madelene)\nIncreased(ilene)\nIntoxicant(ilene)\nJudicable(ilene)\nClubfooted(ilene)\nBellicose(ilene)\nIncreased(clemente)\nIntoxicant(clemente)\nJudicable(clemente)\nClubfooted(clemente)\nBonkers(clemente)\nBellicose(clemente)\nInterbred(clemente)\nforall x (Judicable(x) and Clubfooted(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> Interbred(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) and Increased(x) -> Clubfooted(x))\nforall x (Clubfooted(x) -> Increased(x))\nforall x (Increased(x) and Clubfooted(x) -> Bellicose(x))\nforall x (Intoxicant(x) and Interbred(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> Judicable(x))\nInterbred(madelene) and Bellicose(madelene) -> Intoxicant(madelene)\n\nBellicose(madelene)\n\nClubfooted(madelene) and forall x (Clubfooted(x) -> Increased(x)) -> therefore Increased(madelene) Increased(madelene) and Clubfooted(madelene) and forall x (Increased(x) and Clubfooted(x) -> Bellicose(x)) -> therefore Bellicose(madelene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Mirabelle is fiducial. Mirabelle is boughless. Mirabelle is hypethral. Sandi is eastward. Sandi is aleuronic. Sandi is fiducial. Sandi is boughless. Sandi is initiative. West is eastward. West is aleuronic. West is fiducial. West is boughless. West is copulatory. West is initiative. West is hypethral. All fiducial, boughless things are copulatory. If something is copulatory then it is hypethral. If something is initiative and eastward then it is boughless. If something is boughless then it is eastward. All eastward, boughless things are initiative. All aleuronic, hypethral things are fiducial. All copulatory things are fiducial. If Mirabelle is hypethral and Mirabelle is initiative then Mirabelle is aleuronic. Mirabelle is not initiative.", "logic": "\nFiducial(mirabelle)\nBoughless(mirabelle)\nHypethral(mirabelle)\nEastward(sandi)\nAleuronic(sandi)\nFiducial(sandi)\nBoughless(sandi)\nInitiative(sandi)\nEastward(west)\nAleuronic(west)\nFiducial(west)\nBoughless(west)\nCopulatory(west)\nInitiative(west)\nHypethral(west)\nforall x (Fiducial(x) and Boughless(x) -> Copulatory(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) -> Hypethral(x))\nforall x (Initiative(x) and Eastward(x) -> Boughless(x))\nforall x (Boughless(x) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) and Boughless(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Hypethral(x) -> Fiducial(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) -> Fiducial(x))\nHypethral(mirabelle) and Initiative(mirabelle) -> Aleuronic(mirabelle)\n\nnot Initiative(mirabelle)\n\nBoughless(mirabelle) and forall x (Boughless(x) -> Eastward(x)) -> therefore Eastward(mirabelle) Eastward(mirabelle) and Boughless(mirabelle) and forall x (Eastward(x) and Boughless(x) -> Initiative(x)) -> therefore Initiative(mirabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Gusty is abusive. Gusty is absorptive. Gusty is barehanded. Ingunna is antiseptic. Ingunna is under. Ingunna is abusive. Ingunna is absorptive. Ingunna is truculent. Rubin is antiseptic. Rubin is under. Rubin is abusive. Rubin is absorptive. Rubin is bats. Rubin is truculent. Rubin is barehanded. All abusive, absorptive things are bats. If something is bats then it is barehanded. If something is truculent and antiseptic then it is absorptive. If something is absorptive then it is antiseptic. All antiseptic, absorptive things are truculent. All under, barehanded things are abusive. All bats things are abusive. If Gusty is barehanded and Gusty is truculent then Gusty is under. Gusty is under.", "logic": "\nAbusive(gusty)\nAbsorptive(gusty)\nBarehanded(gusty)\nAntiseptic(ingunna)\nUnder(ingunna)\nAbusive(ingunna)\nAbsorptive(ingunna)\nTruculent(ingunna)\nAntiseptic(rubin)\nUnder(rubin)\nAbusive(rubin)\nAbsorptive(rubin)\nBats(rubin)\nTruculent(rubin)\nBarehanded(rubin)\nforall x (Abusive(x) and Absorptive(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) and Antiseptic(x) -> Absorptive(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) -> Antiseptic(x))\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) and Absorptive(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Under(x) and Barehanded(x) -> Abusive(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) -> Abusive(x))\nBarehanded(gusty) and Truculent(gusty) -> Under(gusty)\n\nUnder(gusty)\n\nAbsorptive(gusty) and forall x (Absorptive(x) -> Antiseptic(x)) -> therefore Antiseptic(gusty) Antiseptic(gusty) and Absorptive(gusty) and forall x (Antiseptic(x) and Absorptive(x) -> Truculent(x)) -> therefore Truculent(gusty) Barehanded(gusty) and Truculent(gusty) and Barehanded(gusty) and Truculent(gusty) -> Under(gusty) -> therefore Under(gusty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Ange is initiative. Ange is steely. Ange is privy. Dick is untimely. Dick is emphasised. Dick is initiative. Dick is steely. Dick is pretend. Ford is untimely. Ford is emphasised. Ford is initiative. Ford is steely. Ford is unmelted. Ford is pretend. Ford is privy. All initiative, steely things are unmelted. If something is unmelted then it is privy. If something is pretend and untimely then it is steely. If something is steely then it is untimely. All untimely, steely things are pretend. All emphasised, privy things are initiative. All unmelted things are initiative. If Ange is privy and Ange is pretend then Ange is emphasised. Ange is not emphasised.", "logic": "\nInitiative(ange)\nSteely(ange)\nPrivy(ange)\nUntimely(dick)\nEmphasised(dick)\nInitiative(dick)\nSteely(dick)\nPretend(dick)\nUntimely(ford)\nEmphasised(ford)\nInitiative(ford)\nSteely(ford)\nUnmelted(ford)\nPretend(ford)\nPrivy(ford)\nforall x (Initiative(x) and Steely(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Unmelted(x) -> Privy(x))\nforall x (Pretend(x) and Untimely(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Steely(x) -> Untimely(x))\nforall x (Untimely(x) and Steely(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Emphasised(x) and Privy(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Unmelted(x) -> Initiative(x))\nPrivy(ange) and Pretend(ange) -> Emphasised(ange)\n\nnot Emphasised(ange)\n\nSteely(ange) and forall x (Steely(x) -> Untimely(x)) -> therefore Untimely(ange) Untimely(ange) and Steely(ange) and forall x (Untimely(x) and Steely(x) -> Pretend(x)) -> therefore Pretend(ange) Privy(ange) and Pretend(ange) and Privy(ange) and Pretend(ange) -> Emphasised(ange) -> therefore Emphasised(ange)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Jacquelyn is peppery. Jacquelyn is boughten. Jacquelyn is barbarous. Thomasa is stark. Thomasa is boughten. Thomasa is squat. Thomasa is barbarous. Tracy is boughten. Tracy is bypast. Tracy is barbarous. If something is squat then it is stark. If something is barbarous then it is malign. If Jacquelyn is malign and Jacquelyn is peppery then Jacquelyn is squat. If something is boughten and barbarous then it is malign. If something is malign then it is boughten. Rough things are squat. Thomasa is squat.", "logic": "\nPeppery(jacquelyn)\nBoughten(jacquelyn)\nBarbarous(jacquelyn)\nStark(thomasa)\nBoughten(thomasa)\nSquat(thomasa)\nBarbarous(thomasa)\nBoughten(tracy)\nBypast(tracy)\nBarbarous(tracy)\nforall x (Squat(x) -> Stark(x))\nforall x (Barbarous(x) -> Malign(x))\nMalign(jacquelyn) and Peppery(jacquelyn) -> Squat(jacquelyn)\nforall x (Boughten(x) and Barbarous(x) -> Malign(x))\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Boughten(x))\nforall x (Bypast(x) -> Squat(x))\n\nSquat(thomasa)\n\ntherefore Squat(thomasa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Rainer is attenuate. Rainer is engraved. Rainer is gabled. Cabrina is gauzy. Cabrina is engraved. Cabrina is boffo. Cabrina is gabled. Julienne is engraved. Julienne is dimorphous. Julienne is gabled. If something is boffo then it is gauzy. If something is gabled then it is hurt. If Rainer is hurt and Rainer is attenuate then Rainer is boffo. If something is engraved and gabled then it is hurt. If something is hurt then it is engraved. Rough things are boffo. Rainer is not engraved.", "logic": "\nAttenuate(rainer)\nEngraved(rainer)\nGabled(rainer)\nGauzy(cabrina)\nEngraved(cabrina)\nBoffo(cabrina)\nGabled(cabrina)\nEngraved(julienne)\nDimorphous(julienne)\nGabled(julienne)\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Gabled(x) -> Hurt(x))\nHurt(rainer) and Attenuate(rainer) -> Boffo(rainer)\nforall x (Engraved(x) and Gabled(x) -> Hurt(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Dimorphous(x) -> Boffo(x))\n\nnot Engraved(rainer)\n\ntherefore Engraved(rainer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Rowland is unerring. Rowland is matchless. Rowland is tantamount. Adoree is scanty. Adoree is matchless. Adoree is bantering. Adoree is tantamount. Raychel is matchless. Raychel is ectozoan. Raychel is tantamount. If something is bantering then it is scanty. If something is tantamount then it is effluent. If Rowland is effluent and Rowland is unerring then Rowland is bantering. If something is matchless and tantamount then it is effluent. If something is effluent then it is matchless. Rough things are bantering. Raychel is effluent.", "logic": "\nUnerring(rowland)\nMatchless(rowland)\nTantamount(rowland)\nScanty(adoree)\nMatchless(adoree)\nBantering(adoree)\nTantamount(adoree)\nMatchless(raychel)\nEctozoan(raychel)\nTantamount(raychel)\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Tantamount(x) -> Effluent(x))\nEffluent(rowland) and Unerring(rowland) -> Bantering(rowland)\nforall x (Matchless(x) and Tantamount(x) -> Effluent(x))\nforall x (Effluent(x) -> Matchless(x))\nforall x (Ectozoan(x) -> Bantering(x))\n\nEffluent(raychel)\n\nTantamount(raychel) and forall x (Tantamount(x) -> Effluent(x)) -> therefore Effluent(raychel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Wanda is talented. Wanda is wieldy. Wanda is andalusian. Orelie is enough. Orelie is wieldy. Orelie is valved. Orelie is andalusian. Brandice is wieldy. Brandice is plastered. Brandice is andalusian. If something is valved then it is enough. If something is andalusian then it is permeative. If Wanda is permeative and Wanda is talented then Wanda is valved. If something is wieldy and andalusian then it is permeative. If something is permeative then it is wieldy. Rough things are valved. Brandice is not valved.", "logic": "\nTalented(wanda)\nWieldy(wanda)\nAndalusian(wanda)\nEnough(orelie)\nWieldy(orelie)\nValved(orelie)\nAndalusian(orelie)\nWieldy(brandice)\nPlastered(brandice)\nAndalusian(brandice)\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Enough(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> Permeative(x))\nPermeative(wanda) and Talented(wanda) -> Valved(wanda)\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and Andalusian(x) -> Permeative(x))\nforall x (Permeative(x) -> Wieldy(x))\nforall x (Plastered(x) -> Valved(x))\n\nnot Valved(brandice)\n\nPlastered(brandice) and forall x (Plastered(x) -> Valved(x)) -> therefore Valved(brandice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Queenie is chivalric. Queenie is saddled. Queenie is amusing. Havivah is striking. Havivah is saddled. Havivah is injured. Havivah is amusing. Creighton is saddled. Creighton is lxxxviii. Creighton is amusing. If something is injured then it is striking. If something is amusing then it is paraguayan. If Queenie is paraguayan and Queenie is chivalric then Queenie is injured. If something is saddled and amusing then it is paraguayan. If something is paraguayan then it is saddled. Rough things are injured. Creighton is striking.", "logic": "\nChivalric(queenie)\nSaddled(queenie)\nAmusing(queenie)\nStriking(havivah)\nSaddled(havivah)\nInjured(havivah)\nAmusing(havivah)\nSaddled(creighton)\nLxxxviii(creighton)\nAmusing(creighton)\nforall x (Injured(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Amusing(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nParaguayan(queenie) and Chivalric(queenie) -> Injured(queenie)\nforall x (Saddled(x) and Amusing(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Lxxxviii(x) -> Injured(x))\n\nStriking(creighton)\n\nLxxxviii(creighton) and forall x (Lxxxviii(x) -> Injured(x)) -> therefore Injured(creighton) Injured(creighton) and forall x (Injured(x) -> Striking(x)) -> therefore Striking(creighton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Laurice is actinoid. Laurice is barbed. Laurice is grassroots. Fonzie is chartreuse. Fonzie is barbed. Fonzie is idealized. Fonzie is grassroots. Tabatha is barbed. Tabatha is orphic. Tabatha is grassroots. If something is idealized then it is chartreuse. If something is grassroots then it is bengali. If Laurice is bengali and Laurice is actinoid then Laurice is idealized. If something is barbed and grassroots then it is bengali. If something is bengali then it is barbed. Rough things are idealized. Laurice is not idealized.", "logic": "\nActinoid(laurice)\nBarbed(laurice)\nGrassroots(laurice)\nChartreuse(fonzie)\nBarbed(fonzie)\nIdealized(fonzie)\nGrassroots(fonzie)\nBarbed(tabatha)\nOrphic(tabatha)\nGrassroots(tabatha)\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Chartreuse(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) -> Bengali(x))\nBengali(laurice) and Actinoid(laurice) -> Idealized(laurice)\nforall x (Barbed(x) and Grassroots(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) -> Barbed(x))\nforall x (Orphic(x) -> Idealized(x))\n\nnot Idealized(laurice)\n\nGrassroots(laurice) and forall x (Grassroots(x) -> Bengali(x)) -> therefore Bengali(laurice) Bengali(laurice) and Actinoid(laurice) and Bengali(laurice) and Actinoid(laurice) -> Idealized(laurice) -> therefore Idealized(laurice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Lin is lumbar. Lin is stunted. Lin is barky. Wilson is congested. Wilson is stunted. Wilson is annalistic. Wilson is barky. Zeke is stunted. Zeke is sternal. Zeke is barky. If something is annalistic then it is congested. If something is barky then it is airborne. If Lin is airborne and Lin is lumbar then Lin is annalistic. If something is stunted and barky then it is airborne. If something is airborne then it is stunted. Rough things are annalistic. Lin is congested.", "logic": "\nLumbar(lin)\nStunted(lin)\nBarky(lin)\nCongested(wilson)\nStunted(wilson)\nAnnalistic(wilson)\nBarky(wilson)\nStunted(zeke)\nSternal(zeke)\nBarky(zeke)\nforall x (Annalistic(x) -> Congested(x))\nforall x (Barky(x) -> Airborne(x))\nAirborne(lin) and Lumbar(lin) -> Annalistic(lin)\nforall x (Stunted(x) and Barky(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> Stunted(x))\nforall x (Sternal(x) -> Annalistic(x))\n\nCongested(lin)\n\nBarky(lin) and forall x (Barky(x) -> Airborne(x)) -> therefore Airborne(lin) Airborne(lin) and Lumbar(lin) and Airborne(lin) and Lumbar(lin) -> Annalistic(lin) -> therefore Annalistic(lin) Annalistic(lin) and forall x (Annalistic(x) -> Congested(x)) -> therefore Congested(lin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Rosemary is noble. Rosemary is tracked. Rosemary is grizzly. Harrie is glistering. Harrie is tracked. Harrie is reliant. Harrie is grizzly. Zola is tracked. Zola is salaried. Zola is grizzly. If something is reliant then it is glistering. If something is grizzly then it is inscribed. If Rosemary is inscribed and Rosemary is noble then Rosemary is reliant. If something is tracked and grizzly then it is inscribed. If something is inscribed then it is tracked. Rough things are reliant. Rosemary is not glistering.", "logic": "\nNoble(rosemary)\nTracked(rosemary)\nGrizzly(rosemary)\nGlistering(harrie)\nTracked(harrie)\nReliant(harrie)\nGrizzly(harrie)\nTracked(zola)\nSalaried(zola)\nGrizzly(zola)\nforall x (Reliant(x) -> Glistering(x))\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> Inscribed(x))\nInscribed(rosemary) and Noble(rosemary) -> Reliant(rosemary)\nforall x (Tracked(x) and Grizzly(x) -> Inscribed(x))\nforall x (Inscribed(x) -> Tracked(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Reliant(x))\n\nnot Glistering(rosemary)\n\nGrizzly(rosemary) and forall x (Grizzly(x) -> Inscribed(x)) -> therefore Inscribed(rosemary) Inscribed(rosemary) and Noble(rosemary) and Inscribed(rosemary) and Noble(rosemary) -> Reliant(rosemary) -> therefore Reliant(rosemary) Reliant(rosemary) and forall x (Reliant(x) -> Glistering(x)) -> therefore Glistering(rosemary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Rochella is stale. Rochella is excusable. Rochella is voiced. Murdock is anatomical. Murdock is excusable. Murdock is britannic. Murdock is voiced. Alfie is excusable. Alfie is tomentous. Alfie is voiced. If something is britannic then it is anatomical. If something is voiced then it is slimed. If Rochella is slimed and Rochella is stale then Rochella is britannic. If something is excusable and voiced then it is slimed. If something is slimed then it is excusable. Rough things are britannic. Rochella is not tomentous.", "logic": "\nStale(rochella)\nExcusable(rochella)\nVoiced(rochella)\nAnatomical(murdock)\nExcusable(murdock)\nBritannic(murdock)\nVoiced(murdock)\nExcusable(alfie)\nTomentous(alfie)\nVoiced(alfie)\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Anatomical(x))\nforall x (Voiced(x) -> Slimed(x))\nSlimed(rochella) and Stale(rochella) -> Britannic(rochella)\nforall x (Excusable(x) and Voiced(x) -> Slimed(x))\nforall x (Slimed(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Britannic(x))\n\nnot Tomentous(rochella)\n\nnot Tomentous(rochella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Lucine is ungarbed. Lucine is germfree. Lucine is forbidding. Burl is motored. Burl is germfree. Burl is dreamlike. Burl is forbidding. Zachery is germfree. Zachery is henpecked. Zachery is forbidding. If something is dreamlike then it is motored. If something is forbidding then it is hebraical. If Lucine is hebraical and Lucine is ungarbed then Lucine is dreamlike. If something is germfree and forbidding then it is hebraical. If something is hebraical then it is germfree. Rough things are dreamlike. Zachery is ungarbed.", "logic": "\nUngarbed(lucine)\nGermfree(lucine)\nForbidding(lucine)\nMotored(burl)\nGermfree(burl)\nDreamlike(burl)\nForbidding(burl)\nGermfree(zachery)\nHenpecked(zachery)\nForbidding(zachery)\nforall x (Dreamlike(x) -> Motored(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nHebraical(lucine) and Ungarbed(lucine) -> Dreamlike(lucine)\nforall x (Germfree(x) and Forbidding(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nforall x (Hebraical(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Dreamlike(x))\n\nUngarbed(zachery)\n\nUngarbed(zachery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Charil is apomictic. Charil is inverse. Charil is shrill. Rudolf is unuttered. Rudolf is inverse. Rudolf is ghanese. Rudolf is shrill. Brit is inverse. Brit is husky. Brit is shrill. If something is ghanese then it is unuttered. If something is shrill then it is wasteful. If Charil is wasteful and Charil is apomictic then Charil is ghanese. If something is inverse and shrill then it is wasteful. If something is wasteful then it is inverse. Rough things are ghanese. Rudolf is not apomictic.", "logic": "\nApomictic(charil)\nInverse(charil)\nShrill(charil)\nUnuttered(rudolf)\nInverse(rudolf)\nGhanese(rudolf)\nShrill(rudolf)\nInverse(brit)\nHusky(brit)\nShrill(brit)\nforall x (Ghanese(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nWasteful(charil) and Apomictic(charil) -> Ghanese(charil)\nforall x (Inverse(x) and Shrill(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Inverse(x))\nforall x (Husky(x) -> Ghanese(x))\n\nnot Apomictic(rudolf)\n\nnot Apomictic(rudolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Felipe is ukrainian. Felipe is unwavering. Felipe is columned. Valerye is ghastly. Valerye is unwavering. Valerye is sainted. Valerye is columned. Dori is unwavering. Dori is mordant. Dori is columned. If something is sainted then it is ghastly. If something is columned then it is fatigued. If Felipe is fatigued and Felipe is ukrainian then Felipe is sainted. If something is unwavering and columned then it is fatigued. If something is fatigued then it is unwavering. Rough things are sainted. Valerye is mordant.", "logic": "\nUkrainian(felipe)\nUnwavering(felipe)\nColumned(felipe)\nGhastly(valerye)\nUnwavering(valerye)\nSainted(valerye)\nColumned(valerye)\nUnwavering(dori)\nMordant(dori)\nColumned(dori)\nforall x (Sainted(x) -> Ghastly(x))\nforall x (Columned(x) -> Fatigued(x))\nFatigued(felipe) and Ukrainian(felipe) -> Sainted(felipe)\nforall x (Unwavering(x) and Columned(x) -> Fatigued(x))\nforall x (Fatigued(x) -> Unwavering(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) -> Sainted(x))\n\nMordant(valerye)\n\nMordant(valerye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "The riki shrine the jeane. The jeane is sworn. The heywood shrine the riki. The lazlo is sworn. If the heywood shrine the riki and the heywood is specked then the riki is specked. If the jeane shrine the heywood and the heywood is pendulous then the jeane alloy the lazlo. If something is uveous then it alloy the riki. If something is pendulous then it harden the lazlo. If something is uveous and it alloy the riki then the riki is uveous. If something is specked then it alloy the riki. If something shrine the jeane then the jeane is uveous. If something shrine the lazlo then it is sworn. The heywood shrine the riki.", "logic": "\nShrine(riki, jeane)\nSworn(jeane)\nShrine(heywood, riki)\nSworn(lazlo)\nShrine(heywood, riki) and Specked(heywood) -> Specked(riki)\nShrine(jeane, heywood) and Pendulous(heywood) -> Alloy(jeane, lazlo)\nforall x (Uveous(x) -> Alloy(x, riki))\nforall x (Pendulous(x) -> Harden(x, lazlo))\nforall x (Uveous(x) and Alloy(x, riki) -> Uveous(riki))\nforall x (Specked(x) -> Alloy(x, riki))\nforall x (Shrine(x, jeane) -> Uveous(jeane))\nforall x (Shrine(x, lazlo) -> Sworn(x))\n\nShrine(heywood, riki)\n\ntherefore Shrine(heywood, riki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The claire advise the chan. The chan is retired. The jennette advise the claire. The marsh is retired. If the jennette advise the claire and the jennette is voteless then the claire is voteless. If the chan advise the jennette and the jennette is mealy then the chan lengthen the marsh. If something is asthenic then it lengthen the claire. If something is mealy then it filet the marsh. If something is asthenic and it lengthen the claire then the claire is asthenic. If something is voteless then it lengthen the claire. If something advise the chan then the chan is asthenic. If something advise the marsh then it is retired. The marsh is not retired.", "logic": "\nAdvise(claire, chan)\nRetired(chan)\nAdvise(jennette, claire)\nRetired(marsh)\nAdvise(jennette, claire) and Voteless(jennette) -> Voteless(claire)\nAdvise(chan, jennette) and Mealy(jennette) -> Lengthen(chan, marsh)\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Lengthen(x, claire))\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> Filet(x, marsh))\nforall x (Asthenic(x) and Lengthen(x, claire) -> Asthenic(claire))\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Lengthen(x, claire))\nforall x (Advise(x, chan) -> Asthenic(chan))\nforall x (Advise(x, marsh) -> Retired(x))\n\nnot Retired(marsh)\n\ntherefore Retired(marsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The cammie craft the sherwood. The sherwood is franciscan. The sadie craft the cammie. The pedro is franciscan. If the sadie craft the cammie and the sadie is custodial then the cammie is custodial. If the sherwood craft the sadie and the sadie is faint then the sherwood shelter the pedro. If something is planetary then it shelter the cammie. If something is faint then it stratify the pedro. If something is planetary and it shelter the cammie then the cammie is planetary. If something is custodial then it shelter the cammie. If something craft the sherwood then the sherwood is planetary. If something craft the pedro then it is franciscan. The sherwood is planetary.", "logic": "\nCraft(cammie, sherwood)\nFranciscan(sherwood)\nCraft(sadie, cammie)\nFranciscan(pedro)\nCraft(sadie, cammie) and Custodial(sadie) -> Custodial(cammie)\nCraft(sherwood, sadie) and Faint(sadie) -> Shelter(sherwood, pedro)\nforall x (Planetary(x) -> Shelter(x, cammie))\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Stratify(x, pedro))\nforall x (Planetary(x) and Shelter(x, cammie) -> Planetary(cammie))\nforall x (Custodial(x) -> Shelter(x, cammie))\nforall x (Craft(x, sherwood) -> Planetary(sherwood))\nforall x (Craft(x, pedro) -> Franciscan(x))\n\nPlanetary(sherwood)\n\nCraft(cammie, sherwood) and forall x (Craft(x, sherwood) -> Planetary(sherwood)) -> therefore Planetary(sherwood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The flor cicatrize the osmond. The osmond is concurring. The emanuel cicatrize the flor. The alanah is concurring. If the emanuel cicatrize the flor and the emanuel is rested then the flor is rested. If the osmond cicatrize the emanuel and the emanuel is stuffed then the osmond darn the alanah. If something is unsorted then it darn the flor. If something is stuffed then it avoid the alanah. If something is unsorted and it darn the flor then the flor is unsorted. If something is rested then it darn the flor. If something cicatrize the osmond then the osmond is unsorted. If something cicatrize the alanah then it is concurring. The osmond is not unsorted.", "logic": "\nCicatrize(flor, osmond)\nConcurring(osmond)\nCicatrize(emanuel, flor)\nConcurring(alanah)\nCicatrize(emanuel, flor) and Rested(emanuel) -> Rested(flor)\nCicatrize(osmond, emanuel) and Stuffed(emanuel) -> Darn(osmond, alanah)\nforall x (Unsorted(x) -> Darn(x, flor))\nforall x (Stuffed(x) -> Avoid(x, alanah))\nforall x (Unsorted(x) and Darn(x, flor) -> Unsorted(flor))\nforall x (Rested(x) -> Darn(x, flor))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, osmond) -> Unsorted(osmond))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, alanah) -> Concurring(x))\n\nnot Unsorted(osmond)\n\nCicatrize(flor, osmond) and forall x (Cicatrize(x, osmond) -> Unsorted(osmond)) -> therefore Unsorted(osmond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The traver finalise the kaspar. The kaspar is unheaded. The helena finalise the traver. The eunice is unheaded. If the helena finalise the traver and the helena is comfy then the traver is comfy. If the kaspar finalise the helena and the helena is unpleasant then the kaspar hackle the eunice. If something is postural then it hackle the traver. If something is unpleasant then it hinder the eunice. If something is postural and it hackle the traver then the traver is postural. If something is comfy then it hackle the traver. If something finalise the kaspar then the kaspar is postural. If something finalise the eunice then it is unheaded. The kaspar hackle the traver.", "logic": "\nFinalise(traver, kaspar)\nUnheaded(kaspar)\nFinalise(helena, traver)\nUnheaded(eunice)\nFinalise(helena, traver) and Comfy(helena) -> Comfy(traver)\nFinalise(kaspar, helena) and Unpleasant(helena) -> Hackle(kaspar, eunice)\nforall x (Postural(x) -> Hackle(x, traver))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Hinder(x, eunice))\nforall x (Postural(x) and Hackle(x, traver) -> Postural(traver))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Hackle(x, traver))\nforall x (Finalise(x, kaspar) -> Postural(kaspar))\nforall x (Finalise(x, eunice) -> Unheaded(x))\n\nHackle(kaspar, traver)\n\nFinalise(traver, kaspar) and forall x (Finalise(x, kaspar) -> Postural(kaspar)) -> therefore Postural(kaspar) Postural(kaspar) and forall x (Postural(x) -> Hackle(x, traver)) -> therefore Hackle(kaspar, traver)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The gaven outbid the reed. The reed is twisting. The ainslie outbid the gaven. The lezlie is twisting. If the ainslie outbid the gaven and the ainslie is princely then the gaven is princely. If the reed outbid the ainslie and the ainslie is haemic then the reed circuit the lezlie. If something is bisulcate then it circuit the gaven. If something is haemic then it cushion the lezlie. If something is bisulcate and it circuit the gaven then the gaven is bisulcate. If something is princely then it circuit the gaven. If something outbid the reed then the reed is bisulcate. If something outbid the lezlie then it is twisting. The reed does not see the gaven.", "logic": "\nOutbid(gaven, reed)\nTwisting(reed)\nOutbid(ainslie, gaven)\nTwisting(lezlie)\nOutbid(ainslie, gaven) and Princely(ainslie) -> Princely(gaven)\nOutbid(reed, ainslie) and Haemic(ainslie) -> Circuit(reed, lezlie)\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) -> Circuit(x, gaven))\nforall x (Haemic(x) -> Cushion(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) and Circuit(x, gaven) -> Bisulcate(gaven))\nforall x (Princely(x) -> Circuit(x, gaven))\nforall x (Outbid(x, reed) -> Bisulcate(reed))\nforall x (Outbid(x, lezlie) -> Twisting(x))\n\nnot Circuit(reed, gaven)\n\nOutbid(gaven, reed) and forall x (Outbid(x, reed) -> Bisulcate(reed)) -> therefore Bisulcate(reed) Bisulcate(reed) and forall x (Bisulcate(x) -> Circuit(x, gaven)) -> therefore Circuit(reed, gaven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The leodora victual the lulu. The lulu is hammered. The marcel victual the leodora. The charisse is hammered. If the marcel victual the leodora and the marcel is palsied then the leodora is palsied. If the lulu victual the marcel and the marcel is palish then the lulu mention the charisse. If something is hastate then it mention the leodora. If something is palish then it attemper the charisse. If something is hastate and it mention the leodora then the leodora is hastate. If something is palsied then it mention the leodora. If something victual the lulu then the lulu is hastate. If something victual the charisse then it is hammered. The leodora is hastate.", "logic": "\nVictual(leodora, lulu)\nHammered(lulu)\nVictual(marcel, leodora)\nHammered(charisse)\nVictual(marcel, leodora) and Palsied(marcel) -> Palsied(leodora)\nVictual(lulu, marcel) and Palish(marcel) -> Mention(lulu, charisse)\nforall x (Hastate(x) -> Mention(x, leodora))\nforall x (Palish(x) -> Attemper(x, charisse))\nforall x (Hastate(x) and Mention(x, leodora) -> Hastate(leodora))\nforall x (Palsied(x) -> Mention(x, leodora))\nforall x (Victual(x, lulu) -> Hastate(lulu))\nforall x (Victual(x, charisse) -> Hammered(x))\n\nHastate(leodora)\n\nVictual(leodora, lulu) and forall x (Victual(x, lulu) -> Hastate(lulu)) -> therefore Hastate(lulu) Victual(leodora, lulu) and forall x (Victual(x, lulu) -> Hastate(lulu)) -> therefore Hastate(lulu) Hastate(lulu) and forall x (Hastate(x) -> Mention(x, leodora)) -> therefore Mention(lulu, leodora) Hastate(lulu) and Mention(lulu, leodora) and forall x (Hastate(x) and Mention(x, leodora) -> Hastate(leodora)) -> therefore Hastate(leodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The audy tessellate the taylor. The taylor is bicolored. The woody tessellate the audy. The winston is bicolored. If the woody tessellate the audy and the woody is barrelled then the audy is barrelled. If the taylor tessellate the woody and the woody is fervent then the taylor slenderize the winston. If something is stainable then it slenderize the audy. If something is fervent then it neighbor the winston. If something is stainable and it slenderize the audy then the audy is stainable. If something is barrelled then it slenderize the audy. If something tessellate the taylor then the taylor is stainable. If something tessellate the winston then it is bicolored. The audy is not stainable.", "logic": "\nTessellate(audy, taylor)\nBicolored(taylor)\nTessellate(woody, audy)\nBicolored(winston)\nTessellate(woody, audy) and Barrelled(woody) -> Barrelled(audy)\nTessellate(taylor, woody) and Fervent(woody) -> Slenderize(taylor, winston)\nforall x (Stainable(x) -> Slenderize(x, audy))\nforall x (Fervent(x) -> Neighbor(x, winston))\nforall x (Stainable(x) and Slenderize(x, audy) -> Stainable(audy))\nforall x (Barrelled(x) -> Slenderize(x, audy))\nforall x (Tessellate(x, taylor) -> Stainable(taylor))\nforall x (Tessellate(x, winston) -> Bicolored(x))\n\nnot Stainable(audy)\n\nTessellate(audy, taylor) and forall x (Tessellate(x, taylor) -> Stainable(taylor)) -> therefore Stainable(taylor) Tessellate(audy, taylor) and forall x (Tessellate(x, taylor) -> Stainable(taylor)) -> therefore Stainable(taylor) Stainable(taylor) and forall x (Stainable(x) -> Slenderize(x, audy)) -> therefore Slenderize(taylor, audy) Stainable(taylor) and Slenderize(taylor, audy) and forall x (Stainable(x) and Slenderize(x, audy) -> Stainable(audy)) -> therefore Stainable(audy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The theodoric thrombose the betteann. The betteann is rhetorical. The brad thrombose the theodoric. The deni is rhetorical. If the brad thrombose the theodoric and the brad is auricular then the theodoric is auricular. If the betteann thrombose the brad and the brad is latent then the betteann gage the deni. If something is ordinal then it gage the theodoric. If something is latent then it trash the deni. If something is ordinal and it gage the theodoric then the theodoric is ordinal. If something is auricular then it gage the theodoric. If something thrombose the betteann then the betteann is ordinal. If something thrombose the deni then it is rhetorical. The theodoric is not rhetorical.", "logic": "\nThrombose(theodoric, betteann)\nRhetorical(betteann)\nThrombose(brad, theodoric)\nRhetorical(deni)\nThrombose(brad, theodoric) and Auricular(brad) -> Auricular(theodoric)\nThrombose(betteann, brad) and Latent(brad) -> Gage(betteann, deni)\nforall x (Ordinal(x) -> Gage(x, theodoric))\nforall x (Latent(x) -> Trash(x, deni))\nforall x (Ordinal(x) and Gage(x, theodoric) -> Ordinal(theodoric))\nforall x (Auricular(x) -> Gage(x, theodoric))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, betteann) -> Ordinal(betteann))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, deni) -> Rhetorical(x))\n\nnot Rhetorical(theodoric)\n\nforall x (Thrombose(x, deni) -> Rhetorical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The zebulen soup the jodie. The jodie is retral. The rosita soup the zebulen. The abbey is retral. If the rosita soup the zebulen and the rosita is mustached then the zebulen is mustached. If the jodie soup the rosita and the rosita is dated then the jodie quintuple the abbey. If something is monitory then it quintuple the zebulen. If something is dated then it resmudge the abbey. If something is monitory and it quintuple the zebulen then the zebulen is monitory. If something is mustached then it quintuple the zebulen. If something soup the jodie then the jodie is monitory. If something soup the abbey then it is retral. The rosita is retral.", "logic": "\nSoup(zebulen, jodie)\nRetral(jodie)\nSoup(rosita, zebulen)\nRetral(abbey)\nSoup(rosita, zebulen) and Mustached(rosita) -> Mustached(zebulen)\nSoup(jodie, rosita) and Dated(rosita) -> Quintuple(jodie, abbey)\nforall x (Monitory(x) -> Quintuple(x, zebulen))\nforall x (Dated(x) -> Resmudge(x, abbey))\nforall x (Monitory(x) and Quintuple(x, zebulen) -> Monitory(zebulen))\nforall x (Mustached(x) -> Quintuple(x, zebulen))\nforall x (Soup(x, jodie) -> Monitory(jodie))\nforall x (Soup(x, abbey) -> Retral(x))\n\nRetral(rosita)\n\nforall x (Soup(x, abbey) -> Retral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The erma waitress the aldis. The aldis is sooty. The gussy waitress the erma. The haleigh is sooty. If the gussy waitress the erma and the gussy is aplitic then the erma is aplitic. If the aldis waitress the gussy and the gussy is fiducial then the aldis overdraw the haleigh. If something is abkhazian then it overdraw the erma. If something is fiducial then it depolarise the haleigh. If something is abkhazian and it overdraw the erma then the erma is abkhazian. If something is aplitic then it overdraw the erma. If something waitress the aldis then the aldis is abkhazian. If something waitress the haleigh then it is sooty. The gussy does not eat the haleigh.", "logic": "\nWaitress(erma, aldis)\nSooty(aldis)\nWaitress(gussy, erma)\nSooty(haleigh)\nWaitress(gussy, erma) and Aplitic(gussy) -> Aplitic(erma)\nWaitress(aldis, gussy) and Fiducial(gussy) -> Overdraw(aldis, haleigh)\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Overdraw(x, erma))\nforall x (Fiducial(x) -> Depolarise(x, haleigh))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Overdraw(x, erma) -> Abkhazian(erma))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) -> Overdraw(x, erma))\nforall x (Waitress(x, aldis) -> Abkhazian(aldis))\nforall x (Waitress(x, haleigh) -> Sooty(x))\n\nnot Depolarise(gussy, haleigh)\n\nforall x (Fiducial(x) -> Depolarise(x, haleigh)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The murdock brocade the wyn. The wyn is forgivable. The buck brocade the murdock. The mirabella is forgivable. If the buck brocade the murdock and the buck is remorseful then the murdock is remorseful. If the wyn brocade the buck and the buck is tight then the wyn knell the mirabella. If something is horrendous then it knell the murdock. If something is tight then it wedge the mirabella. If something is horrendous and it knell the murdock then the murdock is horrendous. If something is remorseful then it knell the murdock. If something brocade the wyn then the wyn is horrendous. If something brocade the mirabella then it is forgivable. The buck knell the murdock.", "logic": "\nBrocade(murdock, wyn)\nForgivable(wyn)\nBrocade(buck, murdock)\nForgivable(mirabella)\nBrocade(buck, murdock) and Remorseful(buck) -> Remorseful(murdock)\nBrocade(wyn, buck) and Tight(buck) -> Knell(wyn, mirabella)\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Knell(x, murdock))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Wedge(x, mirabella))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) and Knell(x, murdock) -> Horrendous(murdock))\nforall x (Remorseful(x) -> Knell(x, murdock))\nforall x (Brocade(x, wyn) -> Horrendous(wyn))\nforall x (Brocade(x, mirabella) -> Forgivable(x))\n\nKnell(buck, murdock)\n\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Knell(x, murdock)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The witold abash the karim. The karim is unionized. The kiersten abash the witold. The flo is unionized. If the kiersten abash the witold and the kiersten is copious then the witold is copious. If the karim abash the kiersten and the kiersten is listed then the karim feign the flo. If something is wintery then it feign the witold. If something is listed then it ditch the flo. If something is wintery and it feign the witold then the witold is wintery. If something is copious then it feign the witold. If something abash the karim then the karim is wintery. If something abash the flo then it is unionized. The kiersten is not copious.", "logic": "\nAbash(witold, karim)\nUnionized(karim)\nAbash(kiersten, witold)\nUnionized(flo)\nAbash(kiersten, witold) and Copious(kiersten) -> Copious(witold)\nAbash(karim, kiersten) and Listed(kiersten) -> Feign(karim, flo)\nforall x (Wintery(x) -> Feign(x, witold))\nforall x (Listed(x) -> Ditch(x, flo))\nforall x (Wintery(x) and Feign(x, witold) -> Wintery(witold))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Feign(x, witold))\nforall x (Abash(x, karim) -> Wintery(karim))\nforall x (Abash(x, flo) -> Unionized(x))\n\nnot Copious(kiersten)\n\nnot Copious(kiersten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The jolie outline the vibhu. The vibhu is swaybacked. The sheldon outline the jolie. The tina is swaybacked. If the sheldon outline the jolie and the sheldon is dignifying then the jolie is dignifying. If the vibhu outline the sheldon and the sheldon is melodious then the vibhu tumesce the tina. If something is expansible then it tumesce the jolie. If something is melodious then it flog the tina. If something is expansible and it tumesce the jolie then the jolie is expansible. If something is dignifying then it tumesce the jolie. If something outline the vibhu then the vibhu is expansible. If something outline the tina then it is swaybacked. The sheldon outline the tina.", "logic": "\nOutline(jolie, vibhu)\nSwaybacked(vibhu)\nOutline(sheldon, jolie)\nSwaybacked(tina)\nOutline(sheldon, jolie) and Dignifying(sheldon) -> Dignifying(jolie)\nOutline(vibhu, sheldon) and Melodious(sheldon) -> Tumesce(vibhu, tina)\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Tumesce(x, jolie))\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Flog(x, tina))\nforall x (Expansible(x) and Tumesce(x, jolie) -> Expansible(jolie))\nforall x (Dignifying(x) -> Tumesce(x, jolie))\nforall x (Outline(x, vibhu) -> Expansible(vibhu))\nforall x (Outline(x, tina) -> Swaybacked(x))\n\nOutline(sheldon, tina)\n\nOutline(sheldon, tina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The harlene unburden the shelba. The shelba is focussed. The engelbert unburden the harlene. The riane is focussed. If the engelbert unburden the harlene and the engelbert is titillated then the harlene is titillated. If the shelba unburden the engelbert and the engelbert is flakey then the shelba smolder the riane. If something is pressor then it smolder the harlene. If something is flakey then it rout the riane. If something is pressor and it smolder the harlene then the harlene is pressor. If something is titillated then it smolder the harlene. If something unburden the shelba then the shelba is pressor. If something unburden the riane then it is focussed. The harlene does not like the harlene.", "logic": "\nUnburden(harlene, shelba)\nFocussed(shelba)\nUnburden(engelbert, harlene)\nFocussed(riane)\nUnburden(engelbert, harlene) and Titillated(engelbert) -> Titillated(harlene)\nUnburden(shelba, engelbert) and Flakey(engelbert) -> Smolder(shelba, riane)\nforall x (Pressor(x) -> Smolder(x, harlene))\nforall x (Flakey(x) -> Rout(x, riane))\nforall x (Pressor(x) and Smolder(x, harlene) -> Pressor(harlene))\nforall x (Titillated(x) -> Smolder(x, harlene))\nforall x (Unburden(x, shelba) -> Pressor(shelba))\nforall x (Unburden(x, riane) -> Focussed(x))\n\nnot Unburden(harlene, harlene)\n\nnot Unburden(harlene, harlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The wynne palisade the anson. The anson is jovian. The karsten palisade the wynne. The maryjane is jovian. If the karsten palisade the wynne and the karsten is aetiologic then the wynne is aetiologic. If the anson palisade the karsten and the karsten is unwished then the anson throttle the maryjane. If something is skilled then it throttle the wynne. If something is unwished then it cachinnate the maryjane. If something is skilled and it throttle the wynne then the wynne is skilled. If something is aetiologic then it throttle the wynne. If something palisade the anson then the anson is skilled. If something palisade the maryjane then it is jovian. The maryjane palisade the karsten.", "logic": "\nPalisade(wynne, anson)\nJovian(anson)\nPalisade(karsten, wynne)\nJovian(maryjane)\nPalisade(karsten, wynne) and Aetiologic(karsten) -> Aetiologic(wynne)\nPalisade(anson, karsten) and Unwished(karsten) -> Throttle(anson, maryjane)\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Throttle(x, wynne))\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> Cachinnate(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Skilled(x) and Throttle(x, wynne) -> Skilled(wynne))\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Throttle(x, wynne))\nforall x (Palisade(x, anson) -> Skilled(anson))\nforall x (Palisade(x, maryjane) -> Jovian(x))\n\nPalisade(maryjane, karsten)\n\nPalisade(maryjane, karsten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The elyse make the joy. The elyse is urbane. The elyse is edged. The elyse is rear. The elyse tantalize the joy. The elyse admonish the joy. The joy make the elyse. The joy is urbane. The joy is attired. The joy is rear. The joy tantalize the elyse. The joy admonish the elyse. If the joy is urbane then the joy is wobbling. If something admonish the joy then it tantalize the joy. If something is wobbling and it make the elyse then it admonish the joy. The joy is rear.", "logic": "\nMake(elyse, joy)\nUrbane(elyse)\nEdged(elyse)\nRear(elyse)\nTantalize(elyse, joy)\nAdmonish(elyse, joy)\nMake(joy, elyse)\nUrbane(joy)\nAttired(joy)\nRear(joy)\nTantalize(joy, elyse)\nAdmonish(joy, elyse)\nUrbane(joy) -> Wobbling(joy)\nforall x (Admonish(x, joy) -> Tantalize(x, joy))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) and Make(x, elyse) -> Admonish(x, joy))\n\nRear(joy)\n\ntherefore Rear(joy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The janeczka perfume the sherri. The janeczka is merited. The janeczka is gouty. The janeczka is choleraic. The janeczka tend the sherri. The janeczka rumba the sherri. The sherri perfume the janeczka. The sherri is merited. The sherri is diplomatic. The sherri is choleraic. The sherri tend the janeczka. The sherri rumba the janeczka. If the sherri is merited then the sherri is drooping. If something rumba the sherri then it tend the sherri. If something is drooping and it perfume the janeczka then it rumba the sherri. The janeczka does not need the sherri.", "logic": "\nPerfume(janeczka, sherri)\nMerited(janeczka)\nGouty(janeczka)\nCholeraic(janeczka)\nTend(janeczka, sherri)\nRumba(janeczka, sherri)\nPerfume(sherri, janeczka)\nMerited(sherri)\nDiplomatic(sherri)\nCholeraic(sherri)\nTend(sherri, janeczka)\nRumba(sherri, janeczka)\nMerited(sherri) -> Drooping(sherri)\nforall x (Rumba(x, sherri) -> Tend(x, sherri))\nforall x (Drooping(x) and Perfume(x, janeczka) -> Rumba(x, sherri))\n\nnot Tend(janeczka, sherri)\n\ntherefore Tend(janeczka, sherri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The denyse fashion the lonni. The denyse is shaped. The denyse is shoeless. The denyse is crafty. The denyse superpose the lonni. The denyse semaphore the lonni. The lonni fashion the denyse. The lonni is shaped. The lonni is catalytic. The lonni is crafty. The lonni superpose the denyse. The lonni semaphore the denyse. If the lonni is shaped then the lonni is phocine. If something semaphore the lonni then it superpose the lonni. If something is phocine and it fashion the denyse then it semaphore the lonni. The lonni is phocine.", "logic": "\nFashion(denyse, lonni)\nShaped(denyse)\nShoeless(denyse)\nCrafty(denyse)\nSuperpose(denyse, lonni)\nSemaphore(denyse, lonni)\nFashion(lonni, denyse)\nShaped(lonni)\nCatalytic(lonni)\nCrafty(lonni)\nSuperpose(lonni, denyse)\nSemaphore(lonni, denyse)\nShaped(lonni) -> Phocine(lonni)\nforall x (Semaphore(x, lonni) -> Superpose(x, lonni))\nforall x (Phocine(x) and Fashion(x, denyse) -> Semaphore(x, lonni))\n\nPhocine(lonni)\n\nShaped(lonni) and Shaped(lonni) -> Phocine(lonni) -> therefore Phocine(lonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The blaire devalue the virginie. The blaire is flavorous. The blaire is variable. The blaire is bemused. The blaire grey the virginie. The blaire menstruate the virginie. The virginie devalue the blaire. The virginie is flavorous. The virginie is bone. The virginie is bemused. The virginie grey the blaire. The virginie menstruate the blaire. If the virginie is flavorous then the virginie is assistive. If something menstruate the virginie then it grey the virginie. If something is assistive and it devalue the blaire then it menstruate the virginie. The virginie is not assistive.", "logic": "\nDevalue(blaire, virginie)\nFlavorous(blaire)\nVariable(blaire)\nBemused(blaire)\nGrey(blaire, virginie)\nMenstruate(blaire, virginie)\nDevalue(virginie, blaire)\nFlavorous(virginie)\nBone(virginie)\nBemused(virginie)\nGrey(virginie, blaire)\nMenstruate(virginie, blaire)\nFlavorous(virginie) -> Assistive(virginie)\nforall x (Menstruate(x, virginie) -> Grey(x, virginie))\nforall x (Assistive(x) and Devalue(x, blaire) -> Menstruate(x, virginie))\n\nnot Assistive(virginie)\n\nFlavorous(virginie) and Flavorous(virginie) -> Assistive(virginie) -> therefore Assistive(virginie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The naomi bereave the cherey. The naomi is starlit. The naomi is travelled. The naomi is tinseled. The naomi reforest the cherey. The naomi alkalinise the cherey. The cherey bereave the naomi. The cherey is starlit. The cherey is empathic. The cherey is tinseled. The cherey reforest the naomi. The cherey alkalinise the naomi. If the cherey is starlit then the cherey is uraemic. If something alkalinise the cherey then it reforest the cherey. If something is uraemic and it bereave the naomi then it alkalinise the cherey. The cherey alkalinise the cherey.", "logic": "\nBereave(naomi, cherey)\nStarlit(naomi)\nTravelled(naomi)\nTinseled(naomi)\nReforest(naomi, cherey)\nAlkalinise(naomi, cherey)\nBereave(cherey, naomi)\nStarlit(cherey)\nEmpathic(cherey)\nTinseled(cherey)\nReforest(cherey, naomi)\nAlkalinise(cherey, naomi)\nStarlit(cherey) -> Uraemic(cherey)\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, cherey) -> Reforest(x, cherey))\nforall x (Uraemic(x) and Bereave(x, naomi) -> Alkalinise(x, cherey))\n\nAlkalinise(cherey, cherey)\n\nStarlit(cherey) and Starlit(cherey) -> Uraemic(cherey) -> therefore Uraemic(cherey) Uraemic(cherey) and Bereave(cherey, naomi) and forall x (Uraemic(x) and Bereave(x, naomi) -> Alkalinise(x, cherey)) -> therefore Alkalinise(cherey, cherey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The gregor fondle the eliot. The gregor is carinal. The gregor is wistful. The gregor is surmounted. The gregor levy the eliot. The gregor penalize the eliot. The eliot fondle the gregor. The eliot is carinal. The eliot is unremarked. The eliot is surmounted. The eliot levy the gregor. The eliot penalize the gregor. If the eliot is carinal then the eliot is amnionic. If something penalize the eliot then it levy the eliot. If something is amnionic and it fondle the gregor then it penalize the eliot. The eliot does not visit the eliot.", "logic": "\nFondle(gregor, eliot)\nCarinal(gregor)\nWistful(gregor)\nSurmounted(gregor)\nLevy(gregor, eliot)\nPenalize(gregor, eliot)\nFondle(eliot, gregor)\nCarinal(eliot)\nUnremarked(eliot)\nSurmounted(eliot)\nLevy(eliot, gregor)\nPenalize(eliot, gregor)\nCarinal(eliot) -> Amnionic(eliot)\nforall x (Penalize(x, eliot) -> Levy(x, eliot))\nforall x (Amnionic(x) and Fondle(x, gregor) -> Penalize(x, eliot))\n\nnot Penalize(eliot, eliot)\n\nCarinal(eliot) and Carinal(eliot) -> Amnionic(eliot) -> therefore Amnionic(eliot) Amnionic(eliot) and Fondle(eliot, gregor) and forall x (Amnionic(x) and Fondle(x, gregor) -> Penalize(x, eliot)) -> therefore Penalize(eliot, eliot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The delcina neuter the alphonse. The delcina is avid. The delcina is baptistic. The delcina is delicate. The delcina rule the alphonse. The delcina homestead the alphonse. The alphonse neuter the delcina. The alphonse is avid. The alphonse is sceptical. The alphonse is delicate. The alphonse rule the delcina. The alphonse homestead the delcina. If the alphonse is avid then the alphonse is retired. If something homestead the alphonse then it rule the alphonse. If something is retired and it neuter the delcina then it homestead the alphonse. The alphonse rule the alphonse.", "logic": "\nNeuter(delcina, alphonse)\nAvid(delcina)\nBaptistic(delcina)\nDelicate(delcina)\nRule(delcina, alphonse)\nHomestead(delcina, alphonse)\nNeuter(alphonse, delcina)\nAvid(alphonse)\nSceptical(alphonse)\nDelicate(alphonse)\nRule(alphonse, delcina)\nHomestead(alphonse, delcina)\nAvid(alphonse) -> Retired(alphonse)\nforall x (Homestead(x, alphonse) -> Rule(x, alphonse))\nforall x (Retired(x) and Neuter(x, delcina) -> Homestead(x, alphonse))\n\nRule(alphonse, alphonse)\n\nAvid(alphonse) and Avid(alphonse) -> Retired(alphonse) -> therefore Retired(alphonse) Retired(alphonse) and Neuter(alphonse, delcina) and forall x (Retired(x) and Neuter(x, delcina) -> Homestead(x, alphonse)) -> therefore Homestead(alphonse, alphonse) Homestead(alphonse, alphonse) and forall x (Homestead(x, alphonse) -> Rule(x, alphonse)) -> therefore Rule(alphonse, alphonse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The grete raise the ruthi. The grete is later. The grete is bubonic. The grete is north. The grete vulcanize the ruthi. The grete condone the ruthi. The ruthi raise the grete. The ruthi is later. The ruthi is bilobated. The ruthi is north. The ruthi vulcanize the grete. The ruthi condone the grete. If the ruthi is later then the ruthi is epizoan. If something condone the ruthi then it vulcanize the ruthi. If something is epizoan and it raise the grete then it condone the ruthi. The ruthi does not need the ruthi.", "logic": "\nRaise(grete, ruthi)\nLater(grete)\nBubonic(grete)\nNorth(grete)\nVulcanize(grete, ruthi)\nCondone(grete, ruthi)\nRaise(ruthi, grete)\nLater(ruthi)\nBilobated(ruthi)\nNorth(ruthi)\nVulcanize(ruthi, grete)\nCondone(ruthi, grete)\nLater(ruthi) -> Epizoan(ruthi)\nforall x (Condone(x, ruthi) -> Vulcanize(x, ruthi))\nforall x (Epizoan(x) and Raise(x, grete) -> Condone(x, ruthi))\n\nnot Vulcanize(ruthi, ruthi)\n\nLater(ruthi) and Later(ruthi) -> Epizoan(ruthi) -> therefore Epizoan(ruthi) Epizoan(ruthi) and Raise(ruthi, grete) and forall x (Epizoan(x) and Raise(x, grete) -> Condone(x, ruthi)) -> therefore Condone(ruthi, ruthi) Condone(ruthi, ruthi) and forall x (Condone(x, ruthi) -> Vulcanize(x, ruthi)) -> therefore Vulcanize(ruthi, ruthi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The berke zipper the darian. The berke is countless. The berke is unplumbed. The berke is stuffy. The berke choir the darian. The berke hygienize the darian. The darian zipper the berke. The darian is countless. The darian is radical. The darian is stuffy. The darian choir the berke. The darian hygienize the berke. If the darian is countless then the darian is barred. If something hygienize the darian then it choir the darian. If something is barred and it zipper the berke then it hygienize the darian. The berke does not eat the berke.", "logic": "\nZipper(berke, darian)\nCountless(berke)\nUnplumbed(berke)\nStuffy(berke)\nChoir(berke, darian)\nHygienize(berke, darian)\nZipper(darian, berke)\nCountless(darian)\nRadical(darian)\nStuffy(darian)\nChoir(darian, berke)\nHygienize(darian, berke)\nCountless(darian) -> Barred(darian)\nforall x (Hygienize(x, darian) -> Choir(x, darian))\nforall x (Barred(x) and Zipper(x, berke) -> Hygienize(x, darian))\n\nnot Zipper(berke, berke)\n\nnot Zipper(berke, berke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The chriss canker the corabelle. The chriss is prim. The chriss is medullated. The chriss is incomplete. The chriss plead the corabelle. The chriss zinc the corabelle. The corabelle canker the chriss. The corabelle is prim. The corabelle is runty. The corabelle is incomplete. The corabelle plead the chriss. The corabelle zinc the chriss. If the corabelle is prim then the corabelle is infertile. If something zinc the corabelle then it plead the corabelle. If something is infertile and it canker the chriss then it zinc the corabelle. The chriss is runty.", "logic": "\nCanker(chriss, corabelle)\nPrim(chriss)\nMedullated(chriss)\nIncomplete(chriss)\nPlead(chriss, corabelle)\nZinc(chriss, corabelle)\nCanker(corabelle, chriss)\nPrim(corabelle)\nRunty(corabelle)\nIncomplete(corabelle)\nPlead(corabelle, chriss)\nZinc(corabelle, chriss)\nPrim(corabelle) -> Infertile(corabelle)\nforall x (Zinc(x, corabelle) -> Plead(x, corabelle))\nforall x (Infertile(x) and Canker(x, chriss) -> Zinc(x, corabelle))\n\nRunty(chriss)\n\nRunty(chriss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The karlen sculpt the xenos. The karlen is tenured. The karlen is armored. The karlen is budgetary. The karlen distrain the xenos. The karlen demonize the xenos. The xenos sculpt the karlen. The xenos is tenured. The xenos is uncomely. The xenos is budgetary. The xenos distrain the karlen. The xenos demonize the karlen. If the xenos is tenured then the xenos is unbounded. If something demonize the xenos then it distrain the xenos. If something is unbounded and it sculpt the karlen then it demonize the xenos. The karlen is not unbounded.", "logic": "\nSculpt(karlen, xenos)\nTenured(karlen)\nArmored(karlen)\nBudgetary(karlen)\nDistrain(karlen, xenos)\nDemonize(karlen, xenos)\nSculpt(xenos, karlen)\nTenured(xenos)\nUncomely(xenos)\nBudgetary(xenos)\nDistrain(xenos, karlen)\nDemonize(xenos, karlen)\nTenured(xenos) -> Unbounded(xenos)\nforall x (Demonize(x, xenos) -> Distrain(x, xenos))\nforall x (Unbounded(x) and Sculpt(x, karlen) -> Demonize(x, xenos))\n\nnot Unbounded(karlen)\n\nnot Unbounded(karlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The valera expect the caleb. The valera is committed. The valera is erroneous. The valera is cresson. The valera slander the caleb. The valera dandify the caleb. The caleb expect the valera. The caleb is committed. The caleb is bivariate. The caleb is cresson. The caleb slander the valera. The caleb dandify the valera. If the caleb is committed then the caleb is categoric. If something dandify the caleb then it slander the caleb. If something is categoric and it expect the valera then it dandify the caleb. The valera slander the valera.", "logic": "\nExpect(valera, caleb)\nCommitted(valera)\nErroneous(valera)\nCresson(valera)\nSlander(valera, caleb)\nDandify(valera, caleb)\nExpect(caleb, valera)\nCommitted(caleb)\nBivariate(caleb)\nCresson(caleb)\nSlander(caleb, valera)\nDandify(caleb, valera)\nCommitted(caleb) -> Categoric(caleb)\nforall x (Dandify(x, caleb) -> Slander(x, caleb))\nforall x (Categoric(x) and Expect(x, valera) -> Dandify(x, caleb))\n\nSlander(valera, valera)\n\nSlander(valera, valera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The trude commove the jamey. The trude is petrous. The trude is alopecic. The trude is wizen. The trude prick the jamey. The trude catalogue the jamey. The jamey commove the trude. The jamey is petrous. The jamey is aeronautic. The jamey is wizen. The jamey prick the trude. The jamey catalogue the trude. If the jamey is petrous then the jamey is flinty. If something catalogue the jamey then it prick the jamey. If something is flinty and it commove the trude then it catalogue the jamey. The trude does not visit the trude.", "logic": "\nCommove(trude, jamey)\nPetrous(trude)\nAlopecic(trude)\nWizen(trude)\nPrick(trude, jamey)\nCatalogue(trude, jamey)\nCommove(jamey, trude)\nPetrous(jamey)\nAeronautic(jamey)\nWizen(jamey)\nPrick(jamey, trude)\nCatalogue(jamey, trude)\nPetrous(jamey) -> Flinty(jamey)\nforall x (Catalogue(x, jamey) -> Prick(x, jamey))\nforall x (Flinty(x) and Commove(x, trude) -> Catalogue(x, jamey))\n\nnot Catalogue(trude, trude)\n\nnot Catalogue(trude, trude) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The meredithe safeguard the aeriela. The meredithe is nauseous. The meredithe is sainted. The meredithe is sardinian. The meredithe peruse the aeriela. The meredithe bewray the aeriela. The aeriela safeguard the meredithe. The aeriela is nauseous. The aeriela is apogamic. The aeriela is sardinian. The aeriela peruse the meredithe. The aeriela bewray the meredithe. If the aeriela is nauseous then the aeriela is ideologic. If something bewray the aeriela then it peruse the aeriela. If something is ideologic and it safeguard the meredithe then it bewray the aeriela. The aeriela is sainted.", "logic": "\nSafeguard(meredithe, aeriela)\nNauseous(meredithe)\nSainted(meredithe)\nSardinian(meredithe)\nPeruse(meredithe, aeriela)\nBewray(meredithe, aeriela)\nSafeguard(aeriela, meredithe)\nNauseous(aeriela)\nApogamic(aeriela)\nSardinian(aeriela)\nPeruse(aeriela, meredithe)\nBewray(aeriela, meredithe)\nNauseous(aeriela) -> Ideologic(aeriela)\nforall x (Bewray(x, aeriela) -> Peruse(x, aeriela))\nforall x (Ideologic(x) and Safeguard(x, meredithe) -> Bewray(x, aeriela))\n\nSainted(aeriela)\n\nSainted(aeriela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The roanne is vinegary. If someone is vinegary then they are hated. Big, insentient people are hated. All hated people are exigent. If someone is snappish and vinegary then they are insentient. If the roanne is hated and the roanne is exigent then the roanne is snappish. If someone is hated and vinegary then they are exigent. The roanne is vinegary.", "logic": "\nVinegary(roanne)\nforall x (Vinegary(x) -> Hated(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) and Insentient(x) -> Hated(x))\nforall x (Hated(x) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) and Vinegary(x) -> Insentient(x))\nHated(roanne) and Exigent(roanne) -> Snappish(roanne)\nforall x (Hated(x) and Vinegary(x) -> Exigent(x))\n\nVinegary(roanne)\n\ntherefore Vinegary(roanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The dane is bottomed. If someone is bottomed then they are osmotic. Big, unending people are osmotic. All osmotic people are plumed. If someone is deviant and bottomed then they are unending. If the dane is osmotic and the dane is plumed then the dane is deviant. If someone is osmotic and bottomed then they are plumed. The dane is not bottomed.", "logic": "\nBottomed(dane)\nforall x (Bottomed(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Deviant(x) and Unending(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Osmotic(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Deviant(x) and Bottomed(x) -> Unending(x))\nOsmotic(dane) and Plumed(dane) -> Deviant(dane)\nforall x (Osmotic(x) and Bottomed(x) -> Plumed(x))\n\nnot Bottomed(dane)\n\ntherefore Bottomed(dane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The stanley is palpitant. If someone is palpitant then they are majestic. Big, manx people are majestic. All majestic people are querulous. If someone is hebridean and palpitant then they are manx. If the stanley is majestic and the stanley is querulous then the stanley is hebridean. If someone is majestic and palpitant then they are querulous. The stanley is majestic.", "logic": "\nPalpitant(stanley)\nforall x (Palpitant(x) -> Majestic(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and Manx(x) -> Majestic(x))\nforall x (Majestic(x) -> Querulous(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and Palpitant(x) -> Manx(x))\nMajestic(stanley) and Querulous(stanley) -> Hebridean(stanley)\nforall x (Majestic(x) and Palpitant(x) -> Querulous(x))\n\nMajestic(stanley)\n\nPalpitant(stanley) and forall x (Palpitant(x) -> Majestic(x)) -> therefore Majestic(stanley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The reina is impolite. If someone is impolite then they are restless. Big, unapparent people are restless. All restless people are statuary. If someone is assurgent and impolite then they are unapparent. If the reina is restless and the reina is statuary then the reina is assurgent. If someone is restless and impolite then they are statuary. The reina is not restless.", "logic": "\nImpolite(reina)\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Restless(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Restless(x))\nforall x (Restless(x) -> Statuary(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) and Impolite(x) -> Unapparent(x))\nRestless(reina) and Statuary(reina) -> Assurgent(reina)\nforall x (Restless(x) and Impolite(x) -> Statuary(x))\n\nnot Restless(reina)\n\nImpolite(reina) and forall x (Impolite(x) -> Restless(x)) -> therefore Restless(reina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The latrena is fibreoptic. If someone is fibreoptic then they are untethered. Big, djiboutian people are untethered. All untethered people are vitriolic. If someone is unbiased and fibreoptic then they are djiboutian. If the latrena is untethered and the latrena is vitriolic then the latrena is unbiased. If someone is untethered and fibreoptic then they are vitriolic. The latrena is vitriolic.", "logic": "\nFibreoptic(latrena)\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> Untethered(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Djiboutian(x) -> Untethered(x))\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Vitriolic(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Fibreoptic(x) -> Djiboutian(x))\nUntethered(latrena) and Vitriolic(latrena) -> Unbiased(latrena)\nforall x (Untethered(x) and Fibreoptic(x) -> Vitriolic(x))\n\nVitriolic(latrena)\n\nFibreoptic(latrena) and forall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> Untethered(x)) -> therefore Untethered(latrena) Untethered(latrena) and forall x (Untethered(x) -> Vitriolic(x)) -> therefore Vitriolic(latrena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The joellen is satiated. If someone is satiated then they are unmeasured. Big, smokeless people are unmeasured. All unmeasured people are rousing. If someone is pancreatic and satiated then they are smokeless. If the joellen is unmeasured and the joellen is rousing then the joellen is pancreatic. If someone is unmeasured and satiated then they are rousing. The joellen is not rousing.", "logic": "\nSatiated(joellen)\nforall x (Satiated(x) -> Unmeasured(x))\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) and Smokeless(x) -> Unmeasured(x))\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) and Satiated(x) -> Smokeless(x))\nUnmeasured(joellen) and Rousing(joellen) -> Pancreatic(joellen)\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) and Satiated(x) -> Rousing(x))\n\nnot Rousing(joellen)\n\nSatiated(joellen) and forall x (Satiated(x) -> Unmeasured(x)) -> therefore Unmeasured(joellen) Unmeasured(joellen) and forall x (Unmeasured(x) -> Rousing(x)) -> therefore Rousing(joellen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The ema is unladylike. If someone is unladylike then they are malawian. Big, windless people are malawian. All malawian people are complex. If someone is jellylike and unladylike then they are windless. If the ema is malawian and the ema is complex then the ema is jellylike. If someone is malawian and unladylike then they are complex. The ema is jellylike.", "logic": "\nUnladylike(ema)\nforall x (Unladylike(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Jellylike(x) and Windless(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Complex(x))\nforall x (Jellylike(x) and Unladylike(x) -> Windless(x))\nMalawian(ema) and Complex(ema) -> Jellylike(ema)\nforall x (Malawian(x) and Unladylike(x) -> Complex(x))\n\nJellylike(ema)\n\nUnladylike(ema) and forall x (Unladylike(x) -> Malawian(x)) -> therefore Malawian(ema) Unladylike(ema) and forall x (Unladylike(x) -> Malawian(x)) -> therefore Malawian(ema) Malawian(ema) and forall x (Malawian(x) -> Complex(x)) -> therefore Complex(ema) Malawian(ema) and Complex(ema) and Malawian(ema) and Complex(ema) -> Jellylike(ema) -> therefore Jellylike(ema)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The tomkin is scapose. If someone is scapose then they are spry. Big, behind people are spry. All spry people are charged. If someone is cryogenic and scapose then they are behind. If the tomkin is spry and the tomkin is charged then the tomkin is cryogenic. If someone is spry and scapose then they are charged. The tomkin is not cryogenic.", "logic": "\nScapose(tomkin)\nforall x (Scapose(x) -> Spry(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) and Behind(x) -> Spry(x))\nforall x (Spry(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) and Scapose(x) -> Behind(x))\nSpry(tomkin) and Charged(tomkin) -> Cryogenic(tomkin)\nforall x (Spry(x) and Scapose(x) -> Charged(x))\n\nnot Cryogenic(tomkin)\n\nScapose(tomkin) and forall x (Scapose(x) -> Spry(x)) -> therefore Spry(tomkin) Scapose(tomkin) and forall x (Scapose(x) -> Spry(x)) -> therefore Spry(tomkin) Spry(tomkin) and forall x (Spry(x) -> Charged(x)) -> therefore Charged(tomkin) Spry(tomkin) and Charged(tomkin) and Spry(tomkin) and Charged(tomkin) -> Cryogenic(tomkin) -> therefore Cryogenic(tomkin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The kaylil is unmoving. If someone is unmoving then they are rank. Big, widespread people are rank. All rank people are stalemated. If someone is unopen and unmoving then they are widespread. If the kaylil is rank and the kaylil is stalemated then the kaylil is unopen. If someone is rank and unmoving then they are stalemated. The kaylil does not eat the kaylil.", "logic": "\nUnmoving(kaylil)\nforall x (Unmoving(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) and Widespread(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Stalemated(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) and Unmoving(x) -> Widespread(x))\nRank(kaylil) and Stalemated(kaylil) -> Unopen(kaylil)\nforall x (Rank(x) and Unmoving(x) -> Stalemated(x))\n\nnot Eats(kaylil, kaylil)\n\nnot Eats(kaylil, kaylil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The rosemonde is vapourised. If someone is vapourised then they are nonviable. Big, phony people are nonviable. All nonviable people are jinxed. If someone is aroused and vapourised then they are phony. If the rosemonde is nonviable and the rosemonde is jinxed then the rosemonde is aroused. If someone is nonviable and vapourised then they are jinxed. The rosemonde visits the rosemonde.", "logic": "\nVapourised(rosemonde)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Nonviable(x))\nforall x (Aroused(x) and Phony(x) -> Nonviable(x))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Aroused(x) and Vapourised(x) -> Phony(x))\nNonviable(rosemonde) and Jinxed(rosemonde) -> Aroused(rosemonde)\nforall x (Nonviable(x) and Vapourised(x) -> Jinxed(x))\n\nVisits(rosemonde, rosemonde)\n\nVisits(rosemonde, rosemonde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The kaylee is psychical. The kaylee invaginate the jere. The kakalina enquire the jere. The kakalina invaginate the kaylee. The jere does not chase the kaylee. The jere shoe the kakalina. The jere does not eat the kaylee. The jere is not abomasal. The jere is psychical. The jere is bivariate. If something invaginate the jere and it enquire the jere then the jere shoe the kakalina. If the kaylee shoe the kakalina then the kaylee invaginate the jere. All bivariate things are hoar. If something is hoar and bivariate then it does not like the kakalina. If something shoe the jere then it does not chase the kakalina. If the kakalina does not like the kaylee then the kakalina is defunct. If something invaginate the kakalina then the kakalina shoe the jere. If something is bivariate and it does not like the kakalina then the kakalina is abomasal. The kaylee invaginate the jere.", "logic": "\nPsychical(kaylee)\nInvaginate(kaylee, jere)\nEnquire(kakalina, jere)\nInvaginate(kakalina, kaylee)\nnot Shoe(jere, kaylee)\nShoe(jere, kakalina)\nnot Enquire(jere, kaylee)\nnot Abomasal(jere)\nPsychical(jere)\nBivariate(jere)\nforall x (Invaginate(x, jere) and Enquire(x, jere) -> Shoe(jere, kakalina))\nShoe(kaylee, kakalina) -> Invaginate(kaylee, jere)\nforall x (Bivariate(x) -> Hoar(x))\nforall x (Hoar(x) and Bivariate(x) -> not Invaginate(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Shoe(x, jere) -> not Shoe(x, kakalina))\nnot Invaginate(kakalina, kaylee) -> Defunct(kakalina)\nforall x (Invaginate(x, kakalina) -> Shoe(kakalina, jere))\nforall x (Bivariate(x) and not Invaginate(x, kakalina) -> Abomasal(kakalina))\n\nInvaginate(kaylee, jere)\n\ntherefore Invaginate(kaylee, jere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The myrlene is allopatric. The myrlene shlep the damian. The giffer calliper the damian. The giffer shlep the myrlene. The damian does not chase the myrlene. The damian dabble the giffer. The damian does not eat the myrlene. The damian is not ballistic. The damian is allopatric. The damian is larval. If something shlep the damian and it calliper the damian then the damian dabble the giffer. If the myrlene dabble the giffer then the myrlene shlep the damian. All larval things are leonine. If something is leonine and larval then it does not like the giffer. If something dabble the damian then it does not chase the giffer. If the giffer does not like the myrlene then the giffer is avowed. If something shlep the giffer then the giffer dabble the damian. If something is larval and it does not like the giffer then the giffer is ballistic. The damian calliper the myrlene.", "logic": "\nAllopatric(myrlene)\nShlep(myrlene, damian)\nCalliper(giffer, damian)\nShlep(giffer, myrlene)\nnot Dabble(damian, myrlene)\nDabble(damian, giffer)\nnot Calliper(damian, myrlene)\nnot Ballistic(damian)\nAllopatric(damian)\nLarval(damian)\nforall x (Shlep(x, damian) and Calliper(x, damian) -> Dabble(damian, giffer))\nDabble(myrlene, giffer) -> Shlep(myrlene, damian)\nforall x (Larval(x) -> Leonine(x))\nforall x (Leonine(x) and Larval(x) -> not Shlep(x, giffer))\nforall x (Dabble(x, damian) -> not Dabble(x, giffer))\nnot Shlep(giffer, myrlene) -> Avowed(giffer)\nforall x (Shlep(x, giffer) -> Dabble(giffer, damian))\nforall x (Larval(x) and not Shlep(x, giffer) -> Ballistic(giffer))\n\nCalliper(damian, myrlene)\n\ntherefore not Calliper(damian, myrlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The sindee is surprising. The sindee putt the lorilyn. The crissy green the lorilyn. The crissy putt the sindee. The lorilyn does not chase the sindee. The lorilyn vomit the crissy. The lorilyn does not eat the sindee. The lorilyn is not oaten. The lorilyn is surprising. The lorilyn is gassy. If something putt the lorilyn and it green the lorilyn then the lorilyn vomit the crissy. If the sindee vomit the crissy then the sindee putt the lorilyn. All gassy things are ensuant. If something is ensuant and gassy then it does not like the crissy. If something vomit the lorilyn then it does not chase the crissy. If the crissy does not like the sindee then the crissy is monolithic. If something putt the crissy then the crissy vomit the lorilyn. If something is gassy and it does not like the crissy then the crissy is oaten. The lorilyn is ensuant.", "logic": "\nSurprising(sindee)\nPutt(sindee, lorilyn)\nGreen(crissy, lorilyn)\nPutt(crissy, sindee)\nnot Vomit(lorilyn, sindee)\nVomit(lorilyn, crissy)\nnot Green(lorilyn, sindee)\nnot Oaten(lorilyn)\nSurprising(lorilyn)\nGassy(lorilyn)\nforall x (Putt(x, lorilyn) and Green(x, lorilyn) -> Vomit(lorilyn, crissy))\nVomit(sindee, crissy) -> Putt(sindee, lorilyn)\nforall x (Gassy(x) -> Ensuant(x))\nforall x (Ensuant(x) and Gassy(x) -> not Putt(x, crissy))\nforall x (Vomit(x, lorilyn) -> not Vomit(x, crissy))\nnot Putt(crissy, sindee) -> Monolithic(crissy)\nforall x (Putt(x, crissy) -> Vomit(crissy, lorilyn))\nforall x (Gassy(x) and not Putt(x, crissy) -> Oaten(crissy))\n\nEnsuant(lorilyn)\n\nGassy(lorilyn) and forall x (Gassy(x) -> Ensuant(x)) -> therefore Ensuant(lorilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The vasily is devouring. The vasily pile the sorcha. The sayres outspan the sorcha. The sayres pile the vasily. The sorcha does not chase the vasily. The sorcha totalize the sayres. The sorcha does not eat the vasily. The sorcha is not curtal. The sorcha is devouring. The sorcha is additive. If something pile the sorcha and it outspan the sorcha then the sorcha totalize the sayres. If the vasily totalize the sayres then the vasily pile the sorcha. All additive things are abrupt. If something is abrupt and additive then it does not like the sayres. If something totalize the sorcha then it does not chase the sayres. If the sayres does not like the vasily then the sayres is unheard. If something pile the sayres then the sayres totalize the sorcha. If something is additive and it does not like the sayres then the sayres is curtal. The sorcha is not abrupt.", "logic": "\nDevouring(vasily)\nPile(vasily, sorcha)\nOutspan(sayres, sorcha)\nPile(sayres, vasily)\nnot Totalize(sorcha, vasily)\nTotalize(sorcha, sayres)\nnot Outspan(sorcha, vasily)\nnot Curtal(sorcha)\nDevouring(sorcha)\nAdditive(sorcha)\nforall x (Pile(x, sorcha) and Outspan(x, sorcha) -> Totalize(sorcha, sayres))\nTotalize(vasily, sayres) -> Pile(vasily, sorcha)\nforall x (Additive(x) -> Abrupt(x))\nforall x (Abrupt(x) and Additive(x) -> not Pile(x, sayres))\nforall x (Totalize(x, sorcha) -> not Totalize(x, sayres))\nnot Pile(sayres, vasily) -> Unheard(sayres)\nforall x (Pile(x, sayres) -> Totalize(sayres, sorcha))\nforall x (Additive(x) and not Pile(x, sayres) -> Curtal(sayres))\n\nnot Abrupt(sorcha)\n\nAdditive(sorcha) and forall x (Additive(x) -> Abrupt(x)) -> therefore Abrupt(sorcha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The alexei is improved. The alexei raffle the abelard. The jania dishevel the abelard. The jania raffle the alexei. The abelard does not chase the alexei. The abelard lounge the jania. The abelard does not eat the alexei. The abelard is not doable. The abelard is improved. The abelard is cutaneal. If something raffle the abelard and it dishevel the abelard then the abelard lounge the jania. If the alexei lounge the jania then the alexei raffle the abelard. All cutaneal things are handy. If something is handy and cutaneal then it does not like the jania. If something lounge the abelard then it does not chase the jania. If the jania does not like the alexei then the jania is unseeded. If something raffle the jania then the jania lounge the abelard. If something is cutaneal and it does not like the jania then the jania is doable. The abelard does not like the jania.", "logic": "\nImproved(alexei)\nRaffle(alexei, abelard)\nDishevel(jania, abelard)\nRaffle(jania, alexei)\nnot Lounge(abelard, alexei)\nLounge(abelard, jania)\nnot Dishevel(abelard, alexei)\nnot Doable(abelard)\nImproved(abelard)\nCutaneal(abelard)\nforall x (Raffle(x, abelard) and Dishevel(x, abelard) -> Lounge(abelard, jania))\nLounge(alexei, jania) -> Raffle(alexei, abelard)\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) -> Handy(x))\nforall x (Handy(x) and Cutaneal(x) -> not Raffle(x, jania))\nforall x (Lounge(x, abelard) -> not Lounge(x, jania))\nnot Raffle(jania, alexei) -> Unseeded(jania)\nforall x (Raffle(x, jania) -> Lounge(jania, abelard))\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) and not Raffle(x, jania) -> Doable(jania))\n\nnot Raffle(abelard, jania)\n\nCutaneal(abelard) and forall x (Cutaneal(x) -> Handy(x)) -> therefore Handy(abelard) Handy(abelard) and Cutaneal(abelard) and forall x (Handy(x) and Cutaneal(x) -> not Raffle(x, jania)) -> therefore not Raffle(abelard, jania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The netta is unstressed. The netta dulcify the deerdre. The coraline emulate the deerdre. The coraline dulcify the netta. The deerdre does not chase the netta. The deerdre outnumber the coraline. The deerdre does not eat the netta. The deerdre is not raucous. The deerdre is unstressed. The deerdre is ionised. If something dulcify the deerdre and it emulate the deerdre then the deerdre outnumber the coraline. If the netta outnumber the coraline then the netta dulcify the deerdre. All ionised things are undesirous. If something is undesirous and ionised then it does not like the coraline. If something outnumber the deerdre then it does not chase the coraline. If the coraline does not like the netta then the coraline is taking. If something dulcify the coraline then the coraline outnumber the deerdre. If something is ionised and it does not like the coraline then the coraline is raucous. The deerdre dulcify the coraline.", "logic": "\nUnstressed(netta)\nDulcify(netta, deerdre)\nEmulate(coraline, deerdre)\nDulcify(coraline, netta)\nnot Outnumber(deerdre, netta)\nOutnumber(deerdre, coraline)\nnot Emulate(deerdre, netta)\nnot Raucous(deerdre)\nUnstressed(deerdre)\nIonised(deerdre)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, deerdre) and Emulate(x, deerdre) -> Outnumber(deerdre, coraline))\nOutnumber(netta, coraline) -> Dulcify(netta, deerdre)\nforall x (Ionised(x) -> Undesirous(x))\nforall x (Undesirous(x) and Ionised(x) -> not Dulcify(x, coraline))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, deerdre) -> not Outnumber(x, coraline))\nnot Dulcify(coraline, netta) -> Taking(coraline)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, coraline) -> Outnumber(coraline, deerdre))\nforall x (Ionised(x) and not Dulcify(x, coraline) -> Raucous(coraline))\n\nDulcify(deerdre, coraline)\n\nIonised(deerdre) and forall x (Ionised(x) -> Undesirous(x)) -> therefore Undesirous(deerdre) Undesirous(deerdre) and Ionised(deerdre) and forall x (Undesirous(x) and Ionised(x) -> not Dulcify(x, coraline)) -> therefore not Dulcify(deerdre, coraline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The betteann is dependent. The betteann denitrify the adriana. The guillermo formalise the adriana. The guillermo denitrify the betteann. The adriana does not chase the betteann. The adriana forefend the guillermo. The adriana does not eat the betteann. The adriana is not pituitary. The adriana is dependent. The adriana is utter. If something denitrify the adriana and it formalise the adriana then the adriana forefend the guillermo. If the betteann forefend the guillermo then the betteann denitrify the adriana. All utter things are sincere. If something is sincere and utter then it does not like the guillermo. If something forefend the adriana then it does not chase the guillermo. If the guillermo does not like the betteann then the guillermo is asternal. If something denitrify the guillermo then the guillermo forefend the adriana. If something is utter and it does not like the guillermo then the guillermo is pituitary. The guillermo is pituitary.", "logic": "\nDependent(betteann)\nDenitrify(betteann, adriana)\nFormalise(guillermo, adriana)\nDenitrify(guillermo, betteann)\nnot Forefend(adriana, betteann)\nForefend(adriana, guillermo)\nnot Formalise(adriana, betteann)\nnot Pituitary(adriana)\nDependent(adriana)\nUtter(adriana)\nforall x (Denitrify(x, adriana) and Formalise(x, adriana) -> Forefend(adriana, guillermo))\nForefend(betteann, guillermo) -> Denitrify(betteann, adriana)\nforall x (Utter(x) -> Sincere(x))\nforall x (Sincere(x) and Utter(x) -> not Denitrify(x, guillermo))\nforall x (Forefend(x, adriana) -> not Forefend(x, guillermo))\nnot Denitrify(guillermo, betteann) -> Asternal(guillermo)\nforall x (Denitrify(x, guillermo) -> Forefend(guillermo, adriana))\nforall x (Utter(x) and not Denitrify(x, guillermo) -> Pituitary(guillermo))\n\nPituitary(guillermo)\n\nUtter(adriana) and forall x (Utter(x) -> Sincere(x)) -> therefore Sincere(adriana) Sincere(adriana) and Utter(adriana) and forall x (Sincere(x) and Utter(x) -> not Denitrify(x, guillermo)) -> therefore not Denitrify(adriana, guillermo) Utter(adriana) and not Denitrify(adriana, guillermo) and forall x (Utter(x) and not Denitrify(x, guillermo) -> Pituitary(guillermo)) -> therefore Pituitary(guillermo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The malissa is reversive. The malissa snub the berk. The row immigrate the berk. The row snub the malissa. The berk does not chase the malissa. The berk swelter the row. The berk does not eat the malissa. The berk is not germicidal. The berk is reversive. The berk is spunky. If something snub the berk and it immigrate the berk then the berk swelter the row. If the malissa swelter the row then the malissa snub the berk. All spunky things are elating. If something is elating and spunky then it does not like the row. If something swelter the berk then it does not chase the row. If the row does not like the malissa then the row is extrinsic. If something snub the row then the row swelter the berk. If something is spunky and it does not like the row then the row is germicidal. The row is not germicidal.", "logic": "\nReversive(malissa)\nSnub(malissa, berk)\nImmigrate(row, berk)\nSnub(row, malissa)\nnot Swelter(berk, malissa)\nSwelter(berk, row)\nnot Immigrate(berk, malissa)\nnot Germicidal(berk)\nReversive(berk)\nSpunky(berk)\nforall x (Snub(x, berk) and Immigrate(x, berk) -> Swelter(berk, row))\nSwelter(malissa, row) -> Snub(malissa, berk)\nforall x (Spunky(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Elating(x) and Spunky(x) -> not Snub(x, row))\nforall x (Swelter(x, berk) -> not Swelter(x, row))\nnot Snub(row, malissa) -> Extrinsic(row)\nforall x (Snub(x, row) -> Swelter(row, berk))\nforall x (Spunky(x) and not Snub(x, row) -> Germicidal(row))\n\nnot Germicidal(row)\n\nSpunky(berk) and forall x (Spunky(x) -> Elating(x)) -> therefore Elating(berk) Elating(berk) and Spunky(berk) and forall x (Elating(x) and Spunky(x) -> not Snub(x, row)) -> therefore not Snub(berk, row) Spunky(berk) and not Snub(berk, row) and forall x (Spunky(x) and not Snub(x, row) -> Germicidal(row)) -> therefore Germicidal(row)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The mitchel is thenar. The mitchel syndicate the koral. The maud bard the koral. The maud syndicate the mitchel. The koral does not chase the mitchel. The koral overthrow the maud. The koral does not eat the mitchel. The koral is not dimorphic. The koral is thenar. The koral is jinxed. If something syndicate the koral and it bard the koral then the koral overthrow the maud. If the mitchel overthrow the maud then the mitchel syndicate the koral. All jinxed things are exploitive. If something is exploitive and jinxed then it does not like the maud. If something overthrow the koral then it does not chase the maud. If the maud does not like the mitchel then the maud is tamed. If something syndicate the maud then the maud overthrow the koral. If something is jinxed and it does not like the maud then the maud is dimorphic. The maud is not exploitive.", "logic": "\nThenar(mitchel)\nSyndicate(mitchel, koral)\nBard(maud, koral)\nSyndicate(maud, mitchel)\nnot Overthrow(koral, mitchel)\nOverthrow(koral, maud)\nnot Bard(koral, mitchel)\nnot Dimorphic(koral)\nThenar(koral)\nJinxed(koral)\nforall x (Syndicate(x, koral) and Bard(x, koral) -> Overthrow(koral, maud))\nOverthrow(mitchel, maud) -> Syndicate(mitchel, koral)\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Exploitive(x))\nforall x (Exploitive(x) and Jinxed(x) -> not Syndicate(x, maud))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, koral) -> not Overthrow(x, maud))\nnot Syndicate(maud, mitchel) -> Tamed(maud)\nforall x (Syndicate(x, maud) -> Overthrow(maud, koral))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and not Syndicate(x, maud) -> Dimorphic(maud))\n\nnot Exploitive(maud)\n\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Exploitive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The mirelle is aphetic. The mirelle steepen the john. The thebault organise the john. The thebault steepen the mirelle. The john does not chase the mirelle. The john unman the thebault. The john does not eat the mirelle. The john is not great. The john is aphetic. The john is spunky. If something steepen the john and it organise the john then the john unman the thebault. If the mirelle unman the thebault then the mirelle steepen the john. All spunky things are beatable. If something is beatable and spunky then it does not like the thebault. If something unman the john then it does not chase the thebault. If the thebault does not like the mirelle then the thebault is pitiful. If something steepen the thebault then the thebault unman the john. If something is spunky and it does not like the thebault then the thebault is great. The thebault is pitiful.", "logic": "\nAphetic(mirelle)\nSteepen(mirelle, john)\nOrganise(thebault, john)\nSteepen(thebault, mirelle)\nnot Unman(john, mirelle)\nUnman(john, thebault)\nnot Organise(john, mirelle)\nnot Great(john)\nAphetic(john)\nSpunky(john)\nforall x (Steepen(x, john) and Organise(x, john) -> Unman(john, thebault))\nUnman(mirelle, thebault) -> Steepen(mirelle, john)\nforall x (Spunky(x) -> Beatable(x))\nforall x (Beatable(x) and Spunky(x) -> not Steepen(x, thebault))\nforall x (Unman(x, john) -> not Unman(x, thebault))\nnot Steepen(thebault, mirelle) -> Pitiful(thebault)\nforall x (Steepen(x, thebault) -> Unman(thebault, john))\nforall x (Spunky(x) and not Steepen(x, thebault) -> Great(thebault))\n\nPitiful(thebault)\n\nnot Steepen(thebault, mirelle) -> Pitiful(thebault) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The lesly is bombastic. The lesly wave the amabel. The gus abreact the amabel. The gus wave the lesly. The amabel does not chase the lesly. The amabel vindicate the gus. The amabel does not eat the lesly. The amabel is not deceased. The amabel is bombastic. The amabel is thwarted. If something wave the amabel and it abreact the amabel then the amabel vindicate the gus. If the lesly vindicate the gus then the lesly wave the amabel. All thwarted things are awake. If something is awake and thwarted then it does not like the gus. If something vindicate the amabel then it does not chase the gus. If the gus does not like the lesly then the gus is subliminal. If something wave the gus then the gus vindicate the amabel. If something is thwarted and it does not like the gus then the gus is deceased. The lesly is not awake.", "logic": "\nBombastic(lesly)\nWave(lesly, amabel)\nAbreact(gus, amabel)\nWave(gus, lesly)\nnot Vindicate(amabel, lesly)\nVindicate(amabel, gus)\nnot Abreact(amabel, lesly)\nnot Deceased(amabel)\nBombastic(amabel)\nThwarted(amabel)\nforall x (Wave(x, amabel) and Abreact(x, amabel) -> Vindicate(amabel, gus))\nVindicate(lesly, gus) -> Wave(lesly, amabel)\nforall x (Thwarted(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) and Thwarted(x) -> not Wave(x, gus))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, amabel) -> not Vindicate(x, gus))\nnot Wave(gus, lesly) -> Subliminal(gus)\nforall x (Wave(x, gus) -> Vindicate(gus, amabel))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) and not Wave(x, gus) -> Deceased(gus))\n\nnot Awake(lesly)\n\nforall x (Thwarted(x) -> Awake(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The emmaline is epidermal. The emmaline outbrave the benedikta. The alissa beggar the benedikta. The alissa outbrave the emmaline. The benedikta does not chase the emmaline. The benedikta outspan the alissa. The benedikta does not eat the emmaline. The benedikta is not appeasable. The benedikta is epidermal. The benedikta is disguised. If something outbrave the benedikta and it beggar the benedikta then the benedikta outspan the alissa. If the emmaline outspan the alissa then the emmaline outbrave the benedikta. All disguised things are cogitative. If something is cogitative and disguised then it does not like the alissa. If something outspan the benedikta then it does not chase the alissa. If the alissa does not like the emmaline then the alissa is peaceable. If something outbrave the alissa then the alissa outspan the benedikta. If something is disguised and it does not like the alissa then the alissa is appeasable. The alissa outspan the benedikta.", "logic": "\nEpidermal(emmaline)\nOutbrave(emmaline, benedikta)\nBeggar(alissa, benedikta)\nOutbrave(alissa, emmaline)\nnot Outspan(benedikta, emmaline)\nOutspan(benedikta, alissa)\nnot Beggar(benedikta, emmaline)\nnot Appeasable(benedikta)\nEpidermal(benedikta)\nDisguised(benedikta)\nforall x (Outbrave(x, benedikta) and Beggar(x, benedikta) -> Outspan(benedikta, alissa))\nOutspan(emmaline, alissa) -> Outbrave(emmaline, benedikta)\nforall x (Disguised(x) -> Cogitative(x))\nforall x (Cogitative(x) and Disguised(x) -> not Outbrave(x, alissa))\nforall x (Outspan(x, benedikta) -> not Outspan(x, alissa))\nnot Outbrave(alissa, emmaline) -> Peaceable(alissa)\nforall x (Outbrave(x, alissa) -> Outspan(alissa, benedikta))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and not Outbrave(x, alissa) -> Appeasable(alissa))\n\nOutspan(alissa, benedikta)\n\nforall x (Outbrave(x, alissa) -> Outspan(alissa, benedikta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The shurlock is courtly. The shurlock fail the willette. The ingeberg motorbike the willette. The ingeberg fail the shurlock. The willette does not chase the shurlock. The willette exsiccate the ingeberg. The willette does not eat the shurlock. The willette is not resistive. The willette is courtly. The willette is fourhanded. If something fail the willette and it motorbike the willette then the willette exsiccate the ingeberg. If the shurlock exsiccate the ingeberg then the shurlock fail the willette. All fourhanded things are acneiform. If something is acneiform and fourhanded then it does not like the ingeberg. If something exsiccate the willette then it does not chase the ingeberg. If the ingeberg does not like the shurlock then the ingeberg is qatari. If something fail the ingeberg then the ingeberg exsiccate the willette. If something is fourhanded and it does not like the ingeberg then the ingeberg is resistive. The ingeberg is not fourhanded.", "logic": "\nCourtly(shurlock)\nFail(shurlock, willette)\nMotorbike(ingeberg, willette)\nFail(ingeberg, shurlock)\nnot Exsiccate(willette, shurlock)\nExsiccate(willette, ingeberg)\nnot Motorbike(willette, shurlock)\nnot Resistive(willette)\nCourtly(willette)\nFourhanded(willette)\nforall x (Fail(x, willette) and Motorbike(x, willette) -> Exsiccate(willette, ingeberg))\nExsiccate(shurlock, ingeberg) -> Fail(shurlock, willette)\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Acneiform(x) and Fourhanded(x) -> not Fail(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Exsiccate(x, willette) -> not Exsiccate(x, ingeberg))\nnot Fail(ingeberg, shurlock) -> Qatari(ingeberg)\nforall x (Fail(x, ingeberg) -> Exsiccate(ingeberg, willette))\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) and not Fail(x, ingeberg) -> Resistive(ingeberg))\n\nnot Fourhanded(ingeberg)\n\nnot Fourhanded(ingeberg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The aura is neoliberal. The aura shatter the marline. The william gloat the marline. The william shatter the aura. The marline does not chase the aura. The marline diet the william. The marline does not eat the aura. The marline is not conjoined. The marline is neoliberal. The marline is plumping. If something shatter the marline and it gloat the marline then the marline diet the william. If the aura diet the william then the aura shatter the marline. All plumping things are unfirm. If something is unfirm and plumping then it does not like the william. If something diet the marline then it does not chase the william. If the william does not like the aura then the william is changeful. If something shatter the william then the william diet the marline. If something is plumping and it does not like the william then the william is conjoined. The aura diet the william.", "logic": "\nNeoliberal(aura)\nShatter(aura, marline)\nGloat(william, marline)\nShatter(william, aura)\nnot Diet(marline, aura)\nDiet(marline, william)\nnot Gloat(marline, aura)\nnot Conjoined(marline)\nNeoliberal(marline)\nPlumping(marline)\nforall x (Shatter(x, marline) and Gloat(x, marline) -> Diet(marline, william))\nDiet(aura, william) -> Shatter(aura, marline)\nforall x (Plumping(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Plumping(x) -> not Shatter(x, william))\nforall x (Diet(x, marline) -> not Diet(x, william))\nnot Shatter(william, aura) -> Changeful(william)\nforall x (Shatter(x, william) -> Diet(william, marline))\nforall x (Plumping(x) and not Shatter(x, william) -> Conjoined(william))\n\nDiet(aura, william)\n\nDiet(aura, william) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The sheridan is mistaken. The sheridan librate the laverne. The lazar meet the laverne. The lazar librate the sheridan. The laverne does not chase the sheridan. The laverne soar the lazar. The laverne does not eat the sheridan. The laverne is not brushy. The laverne is mistaken. The laverne is unreduced. If something librate the laverne and it meet the laverne then the laverne soar the lazar. If the sheridan soar the lazar then the sheridan librate the laverne. All unreduced things are barbecued. If something is barbecued and unreduced then it does not like the lazar. If something soar the laverne then it does not chase the lazar. If the lazar does not like the sheridan then the lazar is favorite. If something librate the lazar then the lazar soar the laverne. If something is unreduced and it does not like the lazar then the lazar is brushy. The sheridan does not eat the lazar.", "logic": "\nMistaken(sheridan)\nLibrate(sheridan, laverne)\nMeet(lazar, laverne)\nLibrate(lazar, sheridan)\nnot Soar(laverne, sheridan)\nSoar(laverne, lazar)\nnot Meet(laverne, sheridan)\nnot Brushy(laverne)\nMistaken(laverne)\nUnreduced(laverne)\nforall x (Librate(x, laverne) and Meet(x, laverne) -> Soar(laverne, lazar))\nSoar(sheridan, lazar) -> Librate(sheridan, laverne)\nforall x (Unreduced(x) -> Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) and Unreduced(x) -> not Librate(x, lazar))\nforall x (Soar(x, laverne) -> not Soar(x, lazar))\nnot Librate(lazar, sheridan) -> Favorite(lazar)\nforall x (Librate(x, lazar) -> Soar(lazar, laverne))\nforall x (Unreduced(x) and not Librate(x, lazar) -> Brushy(lazar))\n\nnot Meet(sheridan, lazar)\n\nnot Meet(sheridan, lazar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The hashim is humified. The hashim vamoose the minna. The solomon perceive the minna. The solomon vamoose the hashim. The minna does not chase the hashim. The minna cricket the solomon. The minna does not eat the hashim. The minna is not testaceous. The minna is humified. The minna is pedigreed. If something vamoose the minna and it perceive the minna then the minna cricket the solomon. If the hashim cricket the solomon then the hashim vamoose the minna. All pedigreed things are osteal. If something is osteal and pedigreed then it does not like the solomon. If something cricket the minna then it does not chase the solomon. If the solomon does not like the hashim then the solomon is faraway. If something vamoose the solomon then the solomon cricket the minna. If something is pedigreed and it does not like the solomon then the solomon is testaceous. The minna cricket the minna.", "logic": "\nHumified(hashim)\nVamoose(hashim, minna)\nPerceive(solomon, minna)\nVamoose(solomon, hashim)\nnot Cricket(minna, hashim)\nCricket(minna, solomon)\nnot Perceive(minna, hashim)\nnot Testaceous(minna)\nHumified(minna)\nPedigreed(minna)\nforall x (Vamoose(x, minna) and Perceive(x, minna) -> Cricket(minna, solomon))\nCricket(hashim, solomon) -> Vamoose(hashim, minna)\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Osteal(x))\nforall x (Osteal(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> not Vamoose(x, solomon))\nforall x (Cricket(x, minna) -> not Cricket(x, solomon))\nnot Vamoose(solomon, hashim) -> Faraway(solomon)\nforall x (Vamoose(x, solomon) -> Cricket(solomon, minna))\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) and not Vamoose(x, solomon) -> Testaceous(solomon))\n\nCricket(minna, minna)\n\nCricket(minna, minna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The brietta does not need the josee. The josee confab the brietta. If someone is uncrossed and they chase the brietta then the brietta confab the josee. If the josee confab the brietta then the brietta confab the josee. If someone is supersonic and they chase the josee then they chase the brietta. If someone is uncrossed and supersonic then they like the josee. If someone confab the josee then they are supersonic. If someone is apologetic and they do not like the josee then they need the josee. If the brietta oink the josee then the josee does not need the brietta. If someone confab the brietta and the brietta does not chase the josee then the josee does not need the brietta. The brietta does not need the josee.", "logic": "\nnot Astringe(brietta, josee)\nConfab(josee, brietta)\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) and Confab(x, brietta) -> Confab(brietta, josee))\nConfab(josee, brietta) -> Confab(brietta, josee)\nforall x (Supersonic(x) and Confab(x, josee) -> Confab(x, brietta))\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) and Supersonic(x) -> Oink(x, josee))\nforall x (Confab(x, josee) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) and not Oink(x, josee) -> Astringe(x, josee))\nOink(brietta, josee) -> not Astringe(josee, brietta)\nforall x (Confab(x, brietta) and not Confab(brietta, josee) -> not Astringe(josee, brietta))\n\nnot Astringe(brietta, josee)\n\ntherefore not Astringe(brietta, josee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The rosamond does not need the caty. The caty unlock the rosamond. If someone is scrub and they chase the rosamond then the rosamond unlock the caty. If the caty unlock the rosamond then the rosamond unlock the caty. If someone is baggy and they chase the caty then they chase the rosamond. If someone is scrub and baggy then they like the caty. If someone unlock the caty then they are baggy. If someone is discordant and they do not like the caty then they need the caty. If the rosamond remake the caty then the caty does not need the rosamond. If someone unlock the rosamond and the rosamond does not chase the caty then the caty does not need the rosamond. The caty does not chase the rosamond.", "logic": "\nnot Shoo(rosamond, caty)\nUnlock(caty, rosamond)\nforall x (Scrub(x) and Unlock(x, rosamond) -> Unlock(rosamond, caty))\nUnlock(caty, rosamond) -> Unlock(rosamond, caty)\nforall x (Baggy(x) and Unlock(x, caty) -> Unlock(x, rosamond))\nforall x (Scrub(x) and Baggy(x) -> Remake(x, caty))\nforall x (Unlock(x, caty) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) and not Remake(x, caty) -> Shoo(x, caty))\nRemake(rosamond, caty) -> not Shoo(caty, rosamond)\nforall x (Unlock(x, rosamond) and not Unlock(rosamond, caty) -> not Shoo(caty, rosamond))\n\nnot Unlock(caty, rosamond)\n\ntherefore Unlock(caty, rosamond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The tuckie does not need the kraig. The kraig munition the tuckie. If someone is rank and they chase the tuckie then the tuckie munition the kraig. If the kraig munition the tuckie then the tuckie munition the kraig. If someone is mesmerized and they chase the kraig then they chase the tuckie. If someone is rank and mesmerized then they like the kraig. If someone munition the kraig then they are mesmerized. If someone is weathered and they do not like the kraig then they need the kraig. If the tuckie demob the kraig then the kraig does not need the tuckie. If someone munition the tuckie and the tuckie does not chase the kraig then the kraig does not need the tuckie. The tuckie munition the kraig.", "logic": "\nnot Coalesce(tuckie, kraig)\nMunition(kraig, tuckie)\nforall x (Rank(x) and Munition(x, tuckie) -> Munition(tuckie, kraig))\nMunition(kraig, tuckie) -> Munition(tuckie, kraig)\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Munition(x, kraig) -> Munition(x, tuckie))\nforall x (Rank(x) and Mesmerized(x) -> Demob(x, kraig))\nforall x (Munition(x, kraig) -> Mesmerized(x))\nforall x (Weathered(x) and not Demob(x, kraig) -> Coalesce(x, kraig))\nDemob(tuckie, kraig) -> not Coalesce(kraig, tuckie)\nforall x (Munition(x, tuckie) and not Munition(tuckie, kraig) -> not Coalesce(kraig, tuckie))\n\nMunition(tuckie, kraig)\n\nMunition(kraig, tuckie) and Munition(kraig, tuckie) -> Munition(tuckie, kraig) -> therefore Munition(tuckie, kraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The jean does not need the leola. The leola strip the jean. If someone is attrited and they chase the jean then the jean strip the leola. If the leola strip the jean then the jean strip the leola. If someone is anxious and they chase the leola then they chase the jean. If someone is attrited and anxious then they like the leola. If someone strip the leola then they are anxious. If someone is doglike and they do not like the leola then they need the leola. If the jean versify the leola then the leola does not need the jean. If someone strip the jean and the jean does not chase the leola then the leola does not need the jean. The jean does not chase the leola.", "logic": "\nnot Caption(jean, leola)\nStrip(leola, jean)\nforall x (Attrited(x) and Strip(x, jean) -> Strip(jean, leola))\nStrip(leola, jean) -> Strip(jean, leola)\nforall x (Anxious(x) and Strip(x, leola) -> Strip(x, jean))\nforall x (Attrited(x) and Anxious(x) -> Versify(x, leola))\nforall x (Strip(x, leola) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Doglike(x) and not Versify(x, leola) -> Caption(x, leola))\nVersify(jean, leola) -> not Caption(leola, jean)\nforall x (Strip(x, jean) and not Strip(jean, leola) -> not Caption(leola, jean))\n\nnot Strip(jean, leola)\n\nStrip(leola, jean) and Strip(leola, jean) -> Strip(jean, leola) -> therefore Strip(jean, leola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The roxie does not need the welsh. The welsh dope the roxie. If someone is suspensive and they chase the roxie then the roxie dope the welsh. If the welsh dope the roxie then the roxie dope the welsh. If someone is vestmented and they chase the welsh then they chase the roxie. If someone is suspensive and vestmented then they like the welsh. If someone dope the welsh then they are vestmented. If someone is sixteenth and they do not like the welsh then they need the welsh. If the roxie harm the welsh then the welsh does not need the roxie. If someone dope the roxie and the roxie does not chase the welsh then the welsh does not need the roxie. The roxie is vestmented.", "logic": "\nnot Rhyme(roxie, welsh)\nDope(welsh, roxie)\nforall x (Suspensive(x) and Dope(x, roxie) -> Dope(roxie, welsh))\nDope(welsh, roxie) -> Dope(roxie, welsh)\nforall x (Vestmented(x) and Dope(x, welsh) -> Dope(x, roxie))\nforall x (Suspensive(x) and Vestmented(x) -> Harm(x, welsh))\nforall x (Dope(x, welsh) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) and not Harm(x, welsh) -> Rhyme(x, welsh))\nHarm(roxie, welsh) -> not Rhyme(welsh, roxie)\nforall x (Dope(x, roxie) and not Dope(roxie, welsh) -> not Rhyme(welsh, roxie))\n\nVestmented(roxie)\n\nDope(welsh, roxie) and Dope(welsh, roxie) -> Dope(roxie, welsh) -> therefore Dope(roxie, welsh) Dope(roxie, welsh) and forall x (Dope(x, welsh) -> Vestmented(x)) -> therefore Vestmented(roxie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The elisha does not need the kevin. The kevin displease the elisha. If someone is gritty and they chase the elisha then the elisha displease the kevin. If the kevin displease the elisha then the elisha displease the kevin. If someone is nuts and they chase the kevin then they chase the elisha. If someone is gritty and nuts then they like the kevin. If someone displease the kevin then they are nuts. If someone is hominine and they do not like the kevin then they need the kevin. If the elisha cheque the kevin then the kevin does not need the elisha. If someone displease the elisha and the elisha does not chase the kevin then the kevin does not need the elisha. The elisha is not nuts.", "logic": "\nnot Modulate(elisha, kevin)\nDisplease(kevin, elisha)\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Displease(x, elisha) -> Displease(elisha, kevin))\nDisplease(kevin, elisha) -> Displease(elisha, kevin)\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Displease(x, kevin) -> Displease(x, elisha))\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Nuts(x) -> Cheque(x, kevin))\nforall x (Displease(x, kevin) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Hominine(x) and not Cheque(x, kevin) -> Modulate(x, kevin))\nCheque(elisha, kevin) -> not Modulate(kevin, elisha)\nforall x (Displease(x, elisha) and not Displease(elisha, kevin) -> not Modulate(kevin, elisha))\n\nnot Nuts(elisha)\n\nDisplease(kevin, elisha) and Displease(kevin, elisha) -> Displease(elisha, kevin) -> therefore Displease(elisha, kevin) Displease(elisha, kevin) and forall x (Displease(x, kevin) -> Nuts(x)) -> therefore Nuts(elisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The haleigh does not need the tyrus. The tyrus colonise the haleigh. If someone is taxable and they chase the haleigh then the haleigh colonise the tyrus. If the tyrus colonise the haleigh then the haleigh colonise the tyrus. If someone is uric and they chase the tyrus then they chase the haleigh. If someone is taxable and uric then they like the tyrus. If someone colonise the tyrus then they are uric. If someone is lithe and they do not like the tyrus then they need the tyrus. If the haleigh idealize the tyrus then the tyrus does not need the haleigh. If someone colonise the haleigh and the haleigh does not chase the tyrus then the tyrus does not need the haleigh. The haleigh colonise the haleigh.", "logic": "\nnot Lunch(haleigh, tyrus)\nColonise(tyrus, haleigh)\nforall x (Taxable(x) and Colonise(x, haleigh) -> Colonise(haleigh, tyrus))\nColonise(tyrus, haleigh) -> Colonise(haleigh, tyrus)\nforall x (Uric(x) and Colonise(x, tyrus) -> Colonise(x, haleigh))\nforall x (Taxable(x) and Uric(x) -> Idealize(x, tyrus))\nforall x (Colonise(x, tyrus) -> Uric(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) and not Idealize(x, tyrus) -> Lunch(x, tyrus))\nIdealize(haleigh, tyrus) -> not Lunch(tyrus, haleigh)\nforall x (Colonise(x, haleigh) and not Colonise(haleigh, tyrus) -> not Lunch(tyrus, haleigh))\n\nColonise(haleigh, haleigh)\n\nColonise(tyrus, haleigh) and Colonise(tyrus, haleigh) -> Colonise(haleigh, tyrus) -> therefore Colonise(haleigh, tyrus) Colonise(haleigh, tyrus) and forall x (Colonise(x, tyrus) -> Uric(x)) -> therefore Uric(haleigh) Colonise(tyrus, haleigh) and Colonise(tyrus, haleigh) -> Colonise(haleigh, tyrus) -> therefore Colonise(haleigh, tyrus) Uric(haleigh) and Colonise(haleigh, tyrus) and forall x (Uric(x) and Colonise(x, tyrus) -> Colonise(x, haleigh)) -> therefore Colonise(haleigh, haleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The florenza does not need the haywood. The haywood sleep the florenza. If someone is polluted and they chase the florenza then the florenza sleep the haywood. If the haywood sleep the florenza then the florenza sleep the haywood. If someone is bragging and they chase the haywood then they chase the florenza. If someone is polluted and bragging then they like the haywood. If someone sleep the haywood then they are bragging. If someone is streaky and they do not like the haywood then they need the haywood. If the florenza resell the haywood then the haywood does not need the florenza. If someone sleep the florenza and the florenza does not chase the haywood then the haywood does not need the florenza. The florenza does not chase the florenza.", "logic": "\nnot Augur(florenza, haywood)\nSleep(haywood, florenza)\nforall x (Polluted(x) and Sleep(x, florenza) -> Sleep(florenza, haywood))\nSleep(haywood, florenza) -> Sleep(florenza, haywood)\nforall x (Bragging(x) and Sleep(x, haywood) -> Sleep(x, florenza))\nforall x (Polluted(x) and Bragging(x) -> Resell(x, haywood))\nforall x (Sleep(x, haywood) -> Bragging(x))\nforall x (Streaky(x) and not Resell(x, haywood) -> Augur(x, haywood))\nResell(florenza, haywood) -> not Augur(haywood, florenza)\nforall x (Sleep(x, florenza) and not Sleep(florenza, haywood) -> not Augur(haywood, florenza))\n\nnot Sleep(florenza, florenza)\n\nSleep(haywood, florenza) and Sleep(haywood, florenza) -> Sleep(florenza, haywood) -> therefore Sleep(florenza, haywood) Sleep(florenza, haywood) and forall x (Sleep(x, haywood) -> Bragging(x)) -> therefore Bragging(florenza) Sleep(haywood, florenza) and Sleep(haywood, florenza) -> Sleep(florenza, haywood) -> therefore Sleep(florenza, haywood) Bragging(florenza) and Sleep(florenza, haywood) and forall x (Bragging(x) and Sleep(x, haywood) -> Sleep(x, florenza)) -> therefore Sleep(florenza, florenza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The lauren does not need the dominique. The dominique spice the lauren. If someone is undrawn and they chase the lauren then the lauren spice the dominique. If the dominique spice the lauren then the lauren spice the dominique. If someone is dolourous and they chase the dominique then they chase the lauren. If someone is undrawn and dolourous then they like the dominique. If someone spice the dominique then they are dolourous. If someone is surd and they do not like the dominique then they need the dominique. If the lauren convict the dominique then the dominique does not need the lauren. If someone spice the lauren and the lauren does not chase the dominique then the dominique does not need the lauren. The dominique does not need the dominique.", "logic": "\nnot Vaunt(lauren, dominique)\nSpice(dominique, lauren)\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Spice(x, lauren) -> Spice(lauren, dominique))\nSpice(dominique, lauren) -> Spice(lauren, dominique)\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Spice(x, dominique) -> Spice(x, lauren))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Dolourous(x) -> Convict(x, dominique))\nforall x (Spice(x, dominique) -> Dolourous(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) and not Convict(x, dominique) -> Vaunt(x, dominique))\nConvict(lauren, dominique) -> not Vaunt(dominique, lauren)\nforall x (Spice(x, lauren) and not Spice(lauren, dominique) -> not Vaunt(dominique, lauren))\n\nnot Vaunt(dominique, dominique)\n\nforall x (Surd(x) and not Convict(x, dominique) -> Vaunt(x, dominique)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The ingaborg does not need the buster. The buster charter the ingaborg. If someone is tired and they chase the ingaborg then the ingaborg charter the buster. If the buster charter the ingaborg then the ingaborg charter the buster. If someone is roundish and they chase the buster then they chase the ingaborg. If someone is tired and roundish then they like the buster. If someone charter the buster then they are roundish. If someone is beamy and they do not like the buster then they need the buster. If the ingaborg palliate the buster then the buster does not need the ingaborg. If someone charter the ingaborg and the ingaborg does not chase the buster then the buster does not need the ingaborg. The ingaborg palliate the buster.", "logic": "\nnot Avouch(ingaborg, buster)\nCharter(buster, ingaborg)\nforall x (Tired(x) and Charter(x, ingaborg) -> Charter(ingaborg, buster))\nCharter(buster, ingaborg) -> Charter(ingaborg, buster)\nforall x (Roundish(x) and Charter(x, buster) -> Charter(x, ingaborg))\nforall x (Tired(x) and Roundish(x) -> Palliate(x, buster))\nforall x (Charter(x, buster) -> Roundish(x))\nforall x (Beamy(x) and not Palliate(x, buster) -> Avouch(x, buster))\nPalliate(ingaborg, buster) -> not Avouch(buster, ingaborg)\nforall x (Charter(x, ingaborg) and not Charter(ingaborg, buster) -> not Avouch(buster, ingaborg))\n\nPalliate(ingaborg, buster)\n\nforall x (Tired(x) and Roundish(x) -> Palliate(x, buster)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The vivien does not need the evangelia. The evangelia misquote the vivien. If someone is frizzly and they chase the vivien then the vivien misquote the evangelia. If the evangelia misquote the vivien then the vivien misquote the evangelia. If someone is javanese and they chase the evangelia then they chase the vivien. If someone is frizzly and javanese then they like the evangelia. If someone misquote the evangelia then they are javanese. If someone is aeronautic and they do not like the evangelia then they need the evangelia. If the vivien camber the evangelia then the evangelia does not need the vivien. If someone misquote the vivien and the vivien does not chase the evangelia then the evangelia does not need the vivien. The evangelia does not like the evangelia.", "logic": "\nnot Douche(vivien, evangelia)\nMisquote(evangelia, vivien)\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and Misquote(x, vivien) -> Misquote(vivien, evangelia))\nMisquote(evangelia, vivien) -> Misquote(vivien, evangelia)\nforall x (Javanese(x) and Misquote(x, evangelia) -> Misquote(x, vivien))\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and Javanese(x) -> Camber(x, evangelia))\nforall x (Misquote(x, evangelia) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Aeronautic(x) and not Camber(x, evangelia) -> Douche(x, evangelia))\nCamber(vivien, evangelia) -> not Douche(evangelia, vivien)\nforall x (Misquote(x, vivien) and not Misquote(vivien, evangelia) -> not Douche(evangelia, vivien))\n\nnot Camber(evangelia, evangelia)\n\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and Javanese(x) -> Camber(x, evangelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The elianore does not need the kanya. The kanya sweep the elianore. If someone is coccoid and they chase the elianore then the elianore sweep the kanya. If the kanya sweep the elianore then the elianore sweep the kanya. If someone is eligible and they chase the kanya then they chase the elianore. If someone is coccoid and eligible then they like the kanya. If someone sweep the kanya then they are eligible. If someone is harmonical and they do not like the kanya then they need the kanya. If the elianore cloy the kanya then the kanya does not need the elianore. If someone sweep the elianore and the elianore does not chase the kanya then the kanya does not need the elianore. The kanya is eligible.", "logic": "\nnot Body(elianore, kanya)\nSweep(kanya, elianore)\nforall x (Coccoid(x) and Sweep(x, elianore) -> Sweep(elianore, kanya))\nSweep(kanya, elianore) -> Sweep(elianore, kanya)\nforall x (Eligible(x) and Sweep(x, kanya) -> Sweep(x, elianore))\nforall x (Coccoid(x) and Eligible(x) -> Cloy(x, kanya))\nforall x (Sweep(x, kanya) -> Eligible(x))\nforall x (Harmonical(x) and not Cloy(x, kanya) -> Body(x, kanya))\nCloy(elianore, kanya) -> not Body(kanya, elianore)\nforall x (Sweep(x, elianore) and not Sweep(elianore, kanya) -> not Body(kanya, elianore))\n\nEligible(kanya)\n\nforall x (Sweep(x, kanya) -> Eligible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The lani does not need the jewel. The jewel innervate the lani. If someone is burmese and they chase the lani then the lani innervate the jewel. If the jewel innervate the lani then the lani innervate the jewel. If someone is unbeholden and they chase the jewel then they chase the lani. If someone is burmese and unbeholden then they like the jewel. If someone innervate the jewel then they are unbeholden. If someone is declared and they do not like the jewel then they need the jewel. If the lani costume the jewel then the jewel does not need the lani. If someone innervate the lani and the lani does not chase the jewel then the jewel does not need the lani. The jewel is not kind.", "logic": "\nnot Misspell(lani, jewel)\nInnervate(jewel, lani)\nforall x (Burmese(x) and Innervate(x, lani) -> Innervate(lani, jewel))\nInnervate(jewel, lani) -> Innervate(lani, jewel)\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) and Innervate(x, jewel) -> Innervate(x, lani))\nforall x (Burmese(x) and Unbeholden(x) -> Costume(x, jewel))\nforall x (Innervate(x, jewel) -> Unbeholden(x))\nforall x (Declared(x) and not Costume(x, jewel) -> Misspell(x, jewel))\nCostume(lani, jewel) -> not Misspell(jewel, lani)\nforall x (Innervate(x, lani) and not Innervate(lani, jewel) -> not Misspell(jewel, lani))\n\nnot Kind(jewel)\n\nnot Kind(jewel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The lurline does not need the denni. The denni sample the lurline. If someone is homiletic and they chase the lurline then the lurline sample the denni. If the denni sample the lurline then the lurline sample the denni. If someone is mythic and they chase the denni then they chase the lurline. If someone is homiletic and mythic then they like the denni. If someone sample the denni then they are mythic. If someone is unguided and they do not like the denni then they need the denni. If the lurline corkscrew the denni then the denni does not need the lurline. If someone sample the lurline and the lurline does not chase the denni then the denni does not need the lurline. The lurline is kind.", "logic": "\nnot Incline(lurline, denni)\nSample(denni, lurline)\nforall x (Homiletic(x) and Sample(x, lurline) -> Sample(lurline, denni))\nSample(denni, lurline) -> Sample(lurline, denni)\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Sample(x, denni) -> Sample(x, lurline))\nforall x (Homiletic(x) and Mythic(x) -> Corkscrew(x, denni))\nforall x (Sample(x, denni) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) and not Corkscrew(x, denni) -> Incline(x, denni))\nCorkscrew(lurline, denni) -> not Incline(denni, lurline)\nforall x (Sample(x, lurline) and not Sample(lurline, denni) -> not Incline(denni, lurline))\n\nKind(lurline)\n\nKind(lurline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The josy does not need the bertrand. The bertrand unbolt the josy. If someone is watery and they chase the josy then the josy unbolt the bertrand. If the bertrand unbolt the josy then the josy unbolt the bertrand. If someone is repressed and they chase the bertrand then they chase the josy. If someone is watery and repressed then they like the bertrand. If someone unbolt the bertrand then they are repressed. If someone is proofed and they do not like the bertrand then they need the bertrand. If the josy refine the bertrand then the bertrand does not need the josy. If someone unbolt the josy and the josy does not chase the bertrand then the bertrand does not need the josy. The josy does not like the josy.", "logic": "\nnot Vesiculate(josy, bertrand)\nUnbolt(bertrand, josy)\nforall x (Watery(x) and Unbolt(x, josy) -> Unbolt(josy, bertrand))\nUnbolt(bertrand, josy) -> Unbolt(josy, bertrand)\nforall x (Repressed(x) and Unbolt(x, bertrand) -> Unbolt(x, josy))\nforall x (Watery(x) and Repressed(x) -> Refine(x, bertrand))\nforall x (Unbolt(x, bertrand) -> Repressed(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) and not Refine(x, bertrand) -> Vesiculate(x, bertrand))\nRefine(josy, bertrand) -> not Vesiculate(bertrand, josy)\nforall x (Unbolt(x, josy) and not Unbolt(josy, bertrand) -> not Vesiculate(bertrand, josy))\n\nnot Refine(josy, josy)\n\nnot Refine(josy, josy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The konrad does not need the coletta. The coletta defray the konrad. If someone is iconic and they chase the konrad then the konrad defray the coletta. If the coletta defray the konrad then the konrad defray the coletta. If someone is apodeictic and they chase the coletta then they chase the konrad. If someone is iconic and apodeictic then they like the coletta. If someone defray the coletta then they are apodeictic. If someone is effeminate and they do not like the coletta then they need the coletta. If the konrad cringe the coletta then the coletta does not need the konrad. If someone defray the konrad and the konrad does not chase the coletta then the coletta does not need the konrad. The konrad is iconic.", "logic": "\nnot Besot(konrad, coletta)\nDefray(coletta, konrad)\nforall x (Iconic(x) and Defray(x, konrad) -> Defray(konrad, coletta))\nDefray(coletta, konrad) -> Defray(konrad, coletta)\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) and Defray(x, coletta) -> Defray(x, konrad))\nforall x (Iconic(x) and Apodeictic(x) -> Cringe(x, coletta))\nforall x (Defray(x, coletta) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Effeminate(x) and not Cringe(x, coletta) -> Besot(x, coletta))\nCringe(konrad, coletta) -> not Besot(coletta, konrad)\nforall x (Defray(x, konrad) and not Defray(konrad, coletta) -> not Besot(coletta, konrad))\n\nIconic(konrad)\n\nIconic(konrad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Fara is kept. All kafkaesque things are indigo. All cresson, kept things are cracking. If Fara is indexical and Fara is kafkaesque then Fara is cresson. White, kept things are kafkaesque. If Fara is not awheel then Fara is not kafkaesque. All kept things are indexical. Fara is kept.", "logic": "\nKept(fara)\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) -> Indigo(x))\nforall x (Cresson(x) and Kept(x) -> Cracking(x))\nIndexical(fara) and Kafkaesque(fara) -> Cresson(fara)\nforall x (Indexical(x) and Kept(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nnot Awheel(fara) -> not Kafkaesque(fara)\nforall x (Kept(x) -> Indexical(x))\n\nKept(fara)\n\ntherefore Kept(fara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Lorelle is untufted. All stocky things are uncombable. All unwilling, untufted things are roughshod. If Lorelle is farther and Lorelle is stocky then Lorelle is unwilling. White, untufted things are stocky. If Lorelle is not owing then Lorelle is not stocky. All untufted things are farther. Lorelle is not untufted.", "logic": "\nUntufted(lorelle)\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> Uncombable(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and Untufted(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nFarther(lorelle) and Stocky(lorelle) -> Unwilling(lorelle)\nforall x (Farther(x) and Untufted(x) -> Stocky(x))\nnot Owing(lorelle) -> not Stocky(lorelle)\nforall x (Untufted(x) -> Farther(x))\n\nnot Untufted(lorelle)\n\ntherefore Untufted(lorelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Osbourne is brazen. All shattering things are citywide. All branchless, brazen things are openhanded. If Osbourne is solemn and Osbourne is shattering then Osbourne is branchless. White, brazen things are shattering. If Osbourne is not bloody then Osbourne is not shattering. All brazen things are solemn. Osbourne is solemn.", "logic": "\nBrazen(osbourne)\nforall x (Shattering(x) -> Citywide(x))\nforall x (Branchless(x) and Brazen(x) -> Openhanded(x))\nSolemn(osbourne) and Shattering(osbourne) -> Branchless(osbourne)\nforall x (Solemn(x) and Brazen(x) -> Shattering(x))\nnot Bloody(osbourne) -> not Shattering(osbourne)\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Solemn(x))\n\nSolemn(osbourne)\n\nBrazen(osbourne) and forall x (Brazen(x) -> Solemn(x)) -> therefore Solemn(osbourne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Maryellen is unripe. All sectional things are bald. All unspotted, unripe things are neotenic. If Maryellen is sensitised and Maryellen is sectional then Maryellen is unspotted. White, unripe things are sectional. If Maryellen is not roily then Maryellen is not sectional. All unripe things are sensitised. Maryellen is not sensitised.", "logic": "\nUnripe(maryellen)\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Unspotted(x) and Unripe(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nSensitised(maryellen) and Sectional(maryellen) -> Unspotted(maryellen)\nforall x (Sensitised(x) and Unripe(x) -> Sectional(x))\nnot Roily(maryellen) -> not Sectional(maryellen)\nforall x (Unripe(x) -> Sensitised(x))\n\nnot Sensitised(maryellen)\n\nUnripe(maryellen) and forall x (Unripe(x) -> Sensitised(x)) -> therefore Sensitised(maryellen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Bealle is unexacting. All intramural things are excess. All shrewish, unexacting things are shelflike. If Bealle is ionian and Bealle is intramural then Bealle is shrewish. White, unexacting things are intramural. If Bealle is not amoeboid then Bealle is not intramural. All unexacting things are ionian. Bealle is intramural.", "logic": "\nUnexacting(bealle)\nforall x (Intramural(x) -> Excess(x))\nforall x (Shrewish(x) and Unexacting(x) -> Shelflike(x))\nIonian(bealle) and Intramural(bealle) -> Shrewish(bealle)\nforall x (Ionian(x) and Unexacting(x) -> Intramural(x))\nnot Amoeboid(bealle) -> not Intramural(bealle)\nforall x (Unexacting(x) -> Ionian(x))\n\nIntramural(bealle)\n\nUnexacting(bealle) and forall x (Unexacting(x) -> Ionian(x)) -> therefore Ionian(bealle) Ionian(bealle) and Unexacting(bealle) and forall x (Ionian(x) and Unexacting(x) -> Intramural(x)) -> therefore Intramural(bealle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Mortie is skew. All runty things are ventilated. All gandhian, skew things are imprisoned. If Mortie is wired and Mortie is runty then Mortie is gandhian. White, skew things are runty. If Mortie is not neutral then Mortie is not runty. All skew things are wired. Mortie is not runty.", "logic": "\nSkew(mortie)\nforall x (Runty(x) -> Ventilated(x))\nforall x (Gandhian(x) and Skew(x) -> Imprisoned(x))\nWired(mortie) and Runty(mortie) -> Gandhian(mortie)\nforall x (Wired(x) and Skew(x) -> Runty(x))\nnot Neutral(mortie) -> not Runty(mortie)\nforall x (Skew(x) -> Wired(x))\n\nnot Runty(mortie)\n\nSkew(mortie) and forall x (Skew(x) -> Wired(x)) -> therefore Wired(mortie) Wired(mortie) and Skew(mortie) and forall x (Wired(x) and Skew(x) -> Runty(x)) -> therefore Runty(mortie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Vanda is haggard. All hornless things are literate. All stannic, haggard things are unitary. If Vanda is unsexed and Vanda is hornless then Vanda is stannic. White, haggard things are hornless. If Vanda is not senecan then Vanda is not hornless. All haggard things are unsexed. Vanda is literate.", "logic": "\nHaggard(vanda)\nforall x (Hornless(x) -> Literate(x))\nforall x (Stannic(x) and Haggard(x) -> Unitary(x))\nUnsexed(vanda) and Hornless(vanda) -> Stannic(vanda)\nforall x (Unsexed(x) and Haggard(x) -> Hornless(x))\nnot Senecan(vanda) -> not Hornless(vanda)\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Unsexed(x))\n\nLiterate(vanda)\n\nHaggard(vanda) and forall x (Haggard(x) -> Unsexed(x)) -> therefore Unsexed(vanda) Unsexed(vanda) and Haggard(vanda) and forall x (Unsexed(x) and Haggard(x) -> Hornless(x)) -> therefore Hornless(vanda) Hornless(vanda) and forall x (Hornless(x) -> Literate(x)) -> therefore Literate(vanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Pace is gamy. All reasonable things are passionate. All swinish, gamy things are centennial. If Pace is sceptical and Pace is reasonable then Pace is swinish. White, gamy things are reasonable. If Pace is not needled then Pace is not reasonable. All gamy things are sceptical. Pace is not swinish.", "logic": "\nGamy(pace)\nforall x (Reasonable(x) -> Passionate(x))\nforall x (Swinish(x) and Gamy(x) -> Centennial(x))\nSceptical(pace) and Reasonable(pace) -> Swinish(pace)\nforall x (Sceptical(x) and Gamy(x) -> Reasonable(x))\nnot Needled(pace) -> not Reasonable(pace)\nforall x (Gamy(x) -> Sceptical(x))\n\nnot Swinish(pace)\n\nGamy(pace) and forall x (Gamy(x) -> Sceptical(x)) -> therefore Sceptical(pace) Gamy(pace) and forall x (Gamy(x) -> Sceptical(x)) -> therefore Sceptical(pace) Sceptical(pace) and Gamy(pace) and forall x (Sceptical(x) and Gamy(x) -> Reasonable(x)) -> therefore Reasonable(pace) Sceptical(pace) and Reasonable(pace) and Sceptical(pace) and Reasonable(pace) -> Swinish(pace) -> therefore Swinish(pace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Berry is ominous. Dorit is unapparent. Dorit is unequipped. Davis is ominous. Davis is brazilian. Towney is thenar. Towney is seminude. Green, thenar things are unequipped. Young things are unapparent. If something is unequipped and thenar then it is seminude. All brazilian things are unequipped. If Towney is ominous then Towney is unequipped. All seminude, brazilian things are sixfold. If Towney is unequipped and Towney is unapparent then Towney is brazilian. Furry things are unequipped. Towney is seminude.", "logic": "\nOminous(berry)\nUnapparent(dorit)\nUnequipped(dorit)\nOminous(davis)\nBrazilian(davis)\nThenar(towney)\nSeminude(towney)\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Thenar(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Unapparent(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) and Thenar(x) -> Seminude(x))\nforall x (Brazilian(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nOminous(towney) -> Unequipped(towney)\nforall x (Seminude(x) and Brazilian(x) -> Sixfold(x))\nUnequipped(towney) and Unapparent(towney) -> Brazilian(towney)\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Unequipped(x))\n\nSeminude(towney)\n\ntherefore Seminude(towney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Lura is bowlegged. Ozzy is admired. Ozzy is primordial. Rianon is bowlegged. Rianon is lithic. Anthia is taurine. Anthia is calicular. Green, taurine things are primordial. Young things are admired. If something is primordial and taurine then it is calicular. All lithic things are primordial. If Anthia is bowlegged then Anthia is primordial. All calicular, lithic things are agelong. If Anthia is primordial and Anthia is admired then Anthia is lithic. Furry things are primordial. Ozzy is not primordial.", "logic": "\nBowlegged(lura)\nAdmired(ozzy)\nPrimordial(ozzy)\nBowlegged(rianon)\nLithic(rianon)\nTaurine(anthia)\nCalicular(anthia)\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) and Taurine(x) -> Primordial(x))\nforall x (Primordial(x) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Primordial(x) and Taurine(x) -> Calicular(x))\nforall x (Lithic(x) -> Primordial(x))\nBowlegged(anthia) -> Primordial(anthia)\nforall x (Calicular(x) and Lithic(x) -> Agelong(x))\nPrimordial(anthia) and Admired(anthia) -> Lithic(anthia)\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Primordial(x))\n\nnot Primordial(ozzy)\n\ntherefore Primordial(ozzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Lew is incomplete. Michale is ruttish. Michale is virgin. Fae is incomplete. Fae is towering. Moyna is septuple. Moyna is quirky. Green, septuple things are virgin. Young things are ruttish. If something is virgin and septuple then it is quirky. All towering things are virgin. If Moyna is incomplete then Moyna is virgin. All quirky, towering things are sneering. If Moyna is virgin and Moyna is ruttish then Moyna is towering. Furry things are virgin. Fae is virgin.", "logic": "\nIncomplete(lew)\nRuttish(michale)\nVirgin(michale)\nIncomplete(fae)\nTowering(fae)\nSeptuple(moyna)\nQuirky(moyna)\nforall x (Incomplete(x) and Septuple(x) -> Virgin(x))\nforall x (Virgin(x) -> Ruttish(x))\nforall x (Virgin(x) and Septuple(x) -> Quirky(x))\nforall x (Towering(x) -> Virgin(x))\nIncomplete(moyna) -> Virgin(moyna)\nforall x (Quirky(x) and Towering(x) -> Sneering(x))\nVirgin(moyna) and Ruttish(moyna) -> Towering(moyna)\nforall x (Septuple(x) -> Virgin(x))\n\nVirgin(fae)\n\nTowering(fae) and forall x (Towering(x) -> Virgin(x)) -> therefore Virgin(fae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Dane is quadruped. Amandi is avaricious. Amandi is intestate. Alicia is quadruped. Alicia is teachable. Del is petulant. Del is struggling. Green, petulant things are intestate. Young things are avaricious. If something is intestate and petulant then it is struggling. All teachable things are intestate. If Del is quadruped then Del is intestate. All struggling, teachable things are graven. If Del is intestate and Del is avaricious then Del is teachable. Furry things are intestate. Del is not intestate.", "logic": "\nQuadruped(dane)\nAvaricious(amandi)\nIntestate(amandi)\nQuadruped(alicia)\nTeachable(alicia)\nPetulant(del)\nStruggling(del)\nforall x (Quadruped(x) and Petulant(x) -> Intestate(x))\nforall x (Intestate(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nforall x (Intestate(x) and Petulant(x) -> Struggling(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) -> Intestate(x))\nQuadruped(del) -> Intestate(del)\nforall x (Struggling(x) and Teachable(x) -> Graven(x))\nIntestate(del) and Avaricious(del) -> Teachable(del)\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Intestate(x))\n\nnot Intestate(del)\n\nPetulant(del) and forall x (Petulant(x) -> Intestate(x)) -> therefore Intestate(del)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Rajeev is unnatural. Stormy is ideal. Stormy is unpopular. Tammie is unnatural. Tammie is oversewn. Editha is haematal. Editha is insidious. Green, haematal things are unpopular. Young things are ideal. If something is unpopular and haematal then it is insidious. All oversewn things are unpopular. If Editha is unnatural then Editha is unpopular. All insidious, oversewn things are unmarried. If Editha is unpopular and Editha is ideal then Editha is oversewn. Furry things are unpopular. Editha is ideal.", "logic": "\nUnnatural(rajeev)\nIdeal(stormy)\nUnpopular(stormy)\nUnnatural(tammie)\nOversewn(tammie)\nHaematal(editha)\nInsidious(editha)\nforall x (Unnatural(x) and Haematal(x) -> Unpopular(x))\nforall x (Unpopular(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Unpopular(x) and Haematal(x) -> Insidious(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) -> Unpopular(x))\nUnnatural(editha) -> Unpopular(editha)\nforall x (Insidious(x) and Oversewn(x) -> Unmarried(x))\nUnpopular(editha) and Ideal(editha) -> Oversewn(editha)\nforall x (Haematal(x) -> Unpopular(x))\n\nIdeal(editha)\n\nHaematal(editha) and forall x (Haematal(x) -> Unpopular(x)) -> therefore Unpopular(editha) Unpopular(editha) and forall x (Unpopular(x) -> Ideal(x)) -> therefore Ideal(editha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Sapphire is humanistic. Dyane is umbilicate. Dyane is leafed. Cherri is humanistic. Cherri is assured. Gale is cytologic. Gale is attested. Green, cytologic things are leafed. Young things are umbilicate. If something is leafed and cytologic then it is attested. All assured things are leafed. If Gale is humanistic then Gale is leafed. All attested, assured things are virtuoso. If Gale is leafed and Gale is umbilicate then Gale is assured. Furry things are leafed. Gale is not umbilicate.", "logic": "\nHumanistic(sapphire)\nUmbilicate(dyane)\nLeafed(dyane)\nHumanistic(cherri)\nAssured(cherri)\nCytologic(gale)\nAttested(gale)\nforall x (Humanistic(x) and Cytologic(x) -> Leafed(x))\nforall x (Leafed(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\nforall x (Leafed(x) and Cytologic(x) -> Attested(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Leafed(x))\nHumanistic(gale) -> Leafed(gale)\nforall x (Attested(x) and Assured(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nLeafed(gale) and Umbilicate(gale) -> Assured(gale)\nforall x (Cytologic(x) -> Leafed(x))\n\nnot Umbilicate(gale)\n\nCytologic(gale) and forall x (Cytologic(x) -> Leafed(x)) -> therefore Leafed(gale) Leafed(gale) and forall x (Leafed(x) -> Umbilicate(x)) -> therefore Umbilicate(gale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Mame is sinhala. Burl is tedious. Burl is untenanted. Genia is sinhala. Genia is windswept. Hyatt is virgin. Hyatt is french. Green, virgin things are untenanted. Young things are tedious. If something is untenanted and virgin then it is french. All windswept things are untenanted. If Hyatt is sinhala then Hyatt is untenanted. All french, windswept things are acetose. If Hyatt is untenanted and Hyatt is tedious then Hyatt is windswept. Furry things are untenanted. Hyatt is windswept.", "logic": "\nSinhala(mame)\nTedious(burl)\nUntenanted(burl)\nSinhala(genia)\nWindswept(genia)\nVirgin(hyatt)\nFrench(hyatt)\nforall x (Sinhala(x) and Virgin(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) -> Tedious(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) and Virgin(x) -> French(x))\nforall x (Windswept(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nSinhala(hyatt) -> Untenanted(hyatt)\nforall x (French(x) and Windswept(x) -> Acetose(x))\nUntenanted(hyatt) and Tedious(hyatt) -> Windswept(hyatt)\nforall x (Virgin(x) -> Untenanted(x))\n\nWindswept(hyatt)\n\nVirgin(hyatt) and forall x (Virgin(x) -> Untenanted(x)) -> therefore Untenanted(hyatt) Virgin(hyatt) and forall x (Virgin(x) -> Untenanted(x)) -> therefore Untenanted(hyatt) Untenanted(hyatt) and forall x (Untenanted(x) -> Tedious(x)) -> therefore Tedious(hyatt) Untenanted(hyatt) and Tedious(hyatt) and Untenanted(hyatt) and Tedious(hyatt) -> Windswept(hyatt) -> therefore Windswept(hyatt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Kaycee is grueling. Flossy is toothy. Flossy is syllabled. Helyn is grueling. Helyn is xlvi. Seamus is sapphic. Seamus is annulated. Green, sapphic things are syllabled. Young things are toothy. If something is syllabled and sapphic then it is annulated. All xlvi things are syllabled. If Seamus is grueling then Seamus is syllabled. All annulated, xlvi things are meiotic. If Seamus is syllabled and Seamus is toothy then Seamus is xlvi. Furry things are syllabled. Seamus is not xlvi.", "logic": "\nGrueling(kaycee)\nToothy(flossy)\nSyllabled(flossy)\nGrueling(helyn)\nXlvi(helyn)\nSapphic(seamus)\nAnnulated(seamus)\nforall x (Grueling(x) and Sapphic(x) -> Syllabled(x))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) -> Toothy(x))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) and Sapphic(x) -> Annulated(x))\nforall x (Xlvi(x) -> Syllabled(x))\nGrueling(seamus) -> Syllabled(seamus)\nforall x (Annulated(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Meiotic(x))\nSyllabled(seamus) and Toothy(seamus) -> Xlvi(seamus)\nforall x (Sapphic(x) -> Syllabled(x))\n\nnot Xlvi(seamus)\n\nSapphic(seamus) and forall x (Sapphic(x) -> Syllabled(x)) -> therefore Syllabled(seamus) Sapphic(seamus) and forall x (Sapphic(x) -> Syllabled(x)) -> therefore Syllabled(seamus) Syllabled(seamus) and forall x (Syllabled(x) -> Toothy(x)) -> therefore Toothy(seamus) Syllabled(seamus) and Toothy(seamus) and Syllabled(seamus) and Toothy(seamus) -> Xlvi(seamus) -> therefore Xlvi(seamus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Abdul is atoxic. Rodrick is wrinkled. Rodrick is biological. Jere is atoxic. Jere is unlimited. Arabella is vestibular. Arabella is allotted. Green, vestibular things are biological. Young things are wrinkled. If something is biological and vestibular then it is allotted. All unlimited things are biological. If Arabella is atoxic then Arabella is biological. All allotted, unlimited things are gloomy. If Arabella is biological and Arabella is wrinkled then Arabella is unlimited. Furry things are biological. Abdul is not gloomy.", "logic": "\nAtoxic(abdul)\nWrinkled(rodrick)\nBiological(rodrick)\nAtoxic(jere)\nUnlimited(jere)\nVestibular(arabella)\nAllotted(arabella)\nforall x (Atoxic(x) and Vestibular(x) -> Biological(x))\nforall x (Biological(x) -> Wrinkled(x))\nforall x (Biological(x) and Vestibular(x) -> Allotted(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) -> Biological(x))\nAtoxic(arabella) -> Biological(arabella)\nforall x (Allotted(x) and Unlimited(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nBiological(arabella) and Wrinkled(arabella) -> Unlimited(arabella)\nforall x (Vestibular(x) -> Biological(x))\n\nnot Gloomy(abdul)\n\nforall x (Allotted(x) and Unlimited(x) -> Gloomy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Pietro is anxious. Enriqueta is allied. Enriqueta is renewing. Sibella is anxious. Sibella is beguiled. Gabriel is filmable. Gabriel is binate. Green, filmable things are renewing. Young things are allied. If something is renewing and filmable then it is binate. All beguiled things are renewing. If Gabriel is anxious then Gabriel is renewing. All binate, beguiled things are accrued. If Gabriel is renewing and Gabriel is allied then Gabriel is beguiled. Furry things are renewing. Sibella is binate.", "logic": "\nAnxious(pietro)\nAllied(enriqueta)\nRenewing(enriqueta)\nAnxious(sibella)\nBeguiled(sibella)\nFilmable(gabriel)\nBinate(gabriel)\nforall x (Anxious(x) and Filmable(x) -> Renewing(x))\nforall x (Renewing(x) -> Allied(x))\nforall x (Renewing(x) and Filmable(x) -> Binate(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> Renewing(x))\nAnxious(gabriel) -> Renewing(gabriel)\nforall x (Binate(x) and Beguiled(x) -> Accrued(x))\nRenewing(gabriel) and Allied(gabriel) -> Beguiled(gabriel)\nforall x (Filmable(x) -> Renewing(x))\n\nBinate(sibella)\n\nforall x (Renewing(x) and Filmable(x) -> Binate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Bailey is considered. Casey is septuple. Casey is twilight. Joyan is considered. Joyan is interior. Rayna is past. Rayna is gaping. Green, past things are twilight. Young things are septuple. If something is twilight and past then it is gaping. All interior things are twilight. If Rayna is considered then Rayna is twilight. All gaping, interior things are amatory. If Rayna is twilight and Rayna is septuple then Rayna is interior. Furry things are twilight. Bailey is not twilight.", "logic": "\nConsidered(bailey)\nSeptuple(casey)\nTwilight(casey)\nConsidered(joyan)\nInterior(joyan)\nPast(rayna)\nGaping(rayna)\nforall x (Considered(x) and Past(x) -> Twilight(x))\nforall x (Twilight(x) -> Septuple(x))\nforall x (Twilight(x) and Past(x) -> Gaping(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Twilight(x))\nConsidered(rayna) -> Twilight(rayna)\nforall x (Gaping(x) and Interior(x) -> Amatory(x))\nTwilight(rayna) and Septuple(rayna) -> Interior(rayna)\nforall x (Past(x) -> Twilight(x))\n\nnot Twilight(bailey)\n\nforall x (Considered(x) and Past(x) -> Twilight(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Stinky is vegetative. Winifred is redeemable. Winifred is florid. Ailina is vegetative. Ailina is catacorner. Shurlocke is ruined. Shurlocke is overhead. Green, ruined things are florid. Young things are redeemable. If something is florid and ruined then it is overhead. All catacorner things are florid. If Shurlocke is vegetative then Shurlocke is florid. All overhead, catacorner things are pass. If Shurlocke is florid and Shurlocke is redeemable then Shurlocke is catacorner. Furry things are florid. Ailina is pass.", "logic": "\nVegetative(stinky)\nRedeemable(winifred)\nFlorid(winifred)\nVegetative(ailina)\nCatacorner(ailina)\nRuined(shurlocke)\nOverhead(shurlocke)\nforall x (Vegetative(x) and Ruined(x) -> Florid(x))\nforall x (Florid(x) -> Redeemable(x))\nforall x (Florid(x) and Ruined(x) -> Overhead(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) -> Florid(x))\nVegetative(shurlocke) -> Florid(shurlocke)\nforall x (Overhead(x) and Catacorner(x) -> Pass(x))\nFlorid(shurlocke) and Redeemable(shurlocke) -> Catacorner(shurlocke)\nforall x (Ruined(x) -> Florid(x))\n\nPass(ailina)\n\nforall x (Overhead(x) and Catacorner(x) -> Pass(x)) <- forall x (Florid(x) and Ruined(x) -> Overhead(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Trixy is inwrought. Fenelia is trepid. Fenelia is uncolumned. Jakob is inwrought. Jakob is katabatic. Nena is wieldy. Nena is unfrosted. Green, wieldy things are uncolumned. Young things are trepid. If something is uncolumned and wieldy then it is unfrosted. All katabatic things are uncolumned. If Nena is inwrought then Nena is uncolumned. All unfrosted, katabatic things are systolic. If Nena is uncolumned and Nena is trepid then Nena is katabatic. Furry things are uncolumned. Fenelia is not inwrought.", "logic": "\nInwrought(trixy)\nTrepid(fenelia)\nUncolumned(fenelia)\nInwrought(jakob)\nKatabatic(jakob)\nWieldy(nena)\nUnfrosted(nena)\nforall x (Inwrought(x) and Wieldy(x) -> Uncolumned(x))\nforall x (Uncolumned(x) -> Trepid(x))\nforall x (Uncolumned(x) and Wieldy(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Katabatic(x) -> Uncolumned(x))\nInwrought(nena) -> Uncolumned(nena)\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and Katabatic(x) -> Systolic(x))\nUncolumned(nena) and Trepid(nena) -> Katabatic(nena)\nforall x (Wieldy(x) -> Uncolumned(x))\n\nnot Inwrought(fenelia)\n\nnot Inwrought(fenelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Julia is wonderful. Feodora is miry. Feodora is transitory. Lovell is wonderful. Lovell is damp. Donetta is inapt. Donetta is beaming. Green, inapt things are transitory. Young things are miry. If something is transitory and inapt then it is beaming. All damp things are transitory. If Donetta is wonderful then Donetta is transitory. All beaming, damp things are dazzled. If Donetta is transitory and Donetta is miry then Donetta is damp. Furry things are transitory. Donetta is wonderful.", "logic": "\nWonderful(julia)\nMiry(feodora)\nTransitory(feodora)\nWonderful(lovell)\nDamp(lovell)\nInapt(donetta)\nBeaming(donetta)\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and Inapt(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Miry(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) and Inapt(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Damp(x) -> Transitory(x))\nWonderful(donetta) -> Transitory(donetta)\nforall x (Beaming(x) and Damp(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nTransitory(donetta) and Miry(donetta) -> Damp(donetta)\nforall x (Inapt(x) -> Transitory(x))\n\nWonderful(donetta)\n\nWonderful(donetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Aretha is animal. August is axiomatic. August is jolting. Murray is animal. Murray is bogartian. Kym is sonic. Kym is trancelike. Green, sonic things are jolting. Young things are axiomatic. If something is jolting and sonic then it is trancelike. All bogartian things are jolting. If Kym is animal then Kym is jolting. All trancelike, bogartian things are uncivil. If Kym is jolting and Kym is axiomatic then Kym is bogartian. Furry things are jolting. Murray is not sonic.", "logic": "\nAnimal(aretha)\nAxiomatic(august)\nJolting(august)\nAnimal(murray)\nBogartian(murray)\nSonic(kym)\nTrancelike(kym)\nforall x (Animal(x) and Sonic(x) -> Jolting(x))\nforall x (Jolting(x) -> Axiomatic(x))\nforall x (Jolting(x) and Sonic(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Bogartian(x) -> Jolting(x))\nAnimal(kym) -> Jolting(kym)\nforall x (Trancelike(x) and Bogartian(x) -> Uncivil(x))\nJolting(kym) and Axiomatic(kym) -> Bogartian(kym)\nforall x (Sonic(x) -> Jolting(x))\n\nnot Sonic(murray)\n\nnot Sonic(murray) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Torin is underwater. Cathe is roumanian. Cathe is algometric. Tabby is underwater. Tabby is farfetched. Ellsworth is winking. Ellsworth is meaningful. Green, winking things are algometric. Young things are roumanian. If something is algometric and winking then it is meaningful. All farfetched things are algometric. If Ellsworth is underwater then Ellsworth is algometric. All meaningful, farfetched things are apteral. If Ellsworth is algometric and Ellsworth is roumanian then Ellsworth is farfetched. Furry things are algometric. Cathe is farfetched.", "logic": "\nUnderwater(torin)\nRoumanian(cathe)\nAlgometric(cathe)\nUnderwater(tabby)\nFarfetched(tabby)\nWinking(ellsworth)\nMeaningful(ellsworth)\nforall x (Underwater(x) and Winking(x) -> Algometric(x))\nforall x (Algometric(x) -> Roumanian(x))\nforall x (Algometric(x) and Winking(x) -> Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Farfetched(x) -> Algometric(x))\nUnderwater(ellsworth) -> Algometric(ellsworth)\nforall x (Meaningful(x) and Farfetched(x) -> Apteral(x))\nAlgometric(ellsworth) and Roumanian(ellsworth) -> Farfetched(ellsworth)\nforall x (Winking(x) -> Algometric(x))\n\nFarfetched(cathe)\n\nFarfetched(cathe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Bertrand is inutile. Bertrand is darkling. Bertrand is xxxvi. Bertrand is squishy. Bertrand is repellant. Bertrand is pyrrhic. Bertrand is excusable. Orion is squishy. Orion is pyrrhic. Orion is excusable. All excusable things are xxxvi. Red things are darkling. If something is repellant and squishy then it is pyrrhic. All darkling, pyrrhic things are repellant. If something is pyrrhic and darkling then it is excusable. Round, darkling things are squishy. Bertrand is xxxvi.", "logic": "\nInutile(bertrand)\nDarkling(bertrand)\nXxxvi(bertrand)\nSquishy(bertrand)\nRepellant(bertrand)\nPyrrhic(bertrand)\nExcusable(bertrand)\nSquishy(orion)\nPyrrhic(orion)\nExcusable(orion)\nforall x (Excusable(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nforall x (Xxxvi(x) -> Darkling(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and Squishy(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nforall x (Darkling(x) and Pyrrhic(x) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) and Darkling(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and Darkling(x) -> Squishy(x))\n\nXxxvi(bertrand)\n\ntherefore Xxxvi(bertrand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Tildy is pyrolignic. Tildy is ghoulish. Tildy is allantoic. Tildy is rallying. Tildy is billed. Tildy is fringy. Tildy is unripe. Andrey is rallying. Andrey is fringy. Andrey is unripe. All unripe things are allantoic. Red things are ghoulish. If something is billed and rallying then it is fringy. All ghoulish, fringy things are billed. If something is fringy and ghoulish then it is unripe. Round, ghoulish things are rallying. Tildy is not allantoic.", "logic": "\nPyrolignic(tildy)\nGhoulish(tildy)\nAllantoic(tildy)\nRallying(tildy)\nBilled(tildy)\nFringy(tildy)\nUnripe(tildy)\nRallying(andrey)\nFringy(andrey)\nUnripe(andrey)\nforall x (Unripe(x) -> Allantoic(x))\nforall x (Allantoic(x) -> Ghoulish(x))\nforall x (Billed(x) and Rallying(x) -> Fringy(x))\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) and Fringy(x) -> Billed(x))\nforall x (Fringy(x) and Ghoulish(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Billed(x) and Ghoulish(x) -> Rallying(x))\n\nnot Allantoic(tildy)\n\ntherefore Allantoic(tildy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Glenda is saltish. Glenda is abactinal. Glenda is alone. Glenda is hortatory. Glenda is none. Glenda is discoidal. Glenda is anorthitic. Belvia is hortatory. Belvia is discoidal. Belvia is anorthitic. All anorthitic things are alone. Red things are abactinal. If something is none and hortatory then it is discoidal. All abactinal, discoidal things are none. If something is discoidal and abactinal then it is anorthitic. Round, abactinal things are hortatory. Belvia is alone.", "logic": "\nSaltish(glenda)\nAbactinal(glenda)\nAlone(glenda)\nHortatory(glenda)\nNone(glenda)\nDiscoidal(glenda)\nAnorthitic(glenda)\nHortatory(belvia)\nDiscoidal(belvia)\nAnorthitic(belvia)\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) -> Alone(x))\nforall x (Alone(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (None(x) and Hortatory(x) -> Discoidal(x))\nforall x (Abactinal(x) and Discoidal(x) -> None(x))\nforall x (Discoidal(x) and Abactinal(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (None(x) and Abactinal(x) -> Hortatory(x))\n\nAlone(belvia)\n\nAnorthitic(belvia) and forall x (Anorthitic(x) -> Alone(x)) -> therefore Alone(belvia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Berte is still. Berte is drawn. Berte is voiced. Berte is robotic. Berte is violable. Berte is actionable. Berte is heralded. Philly is robotic. Philly is actionable. Philly is heralded. All heralded things are voiced. Red things are drawn. If something is violable and robotic then it is actionable. All drawn, actionable things are violable. If something is actionable and drawn then it is heralded. Round, drawn things are robotic. Philly is not voiced.", "logic": "\nStill(berte)\nDrawn(berte)\nVoiced(berte)\nRobotic(berte)\nViolable(berte)\nActionable(berte)\nHeralded(berte)\nRobotic(philly)\nActionable(philly)\nHeralded(philly)\nforall x (Heralded(x) -> Voiced(x))\nforall x (Voiced(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) and Robotic(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) and Actionable(x) -> Violable(x))\nforall x (Actionable(x) and Drawn(x) -> Heralded(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) and Drawn(x) -> Robotic(x))\n\nnot Voiced(philly)\n\nHeralded(philly) and forall x (Heralded(x) -> Voiced(x)) -> therefore Voiced(philly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Connor is adorable. Connor is formalised. Connor is ajar. Connor is privileged. Connor is everyday. Connor is fatuous. Connor is conducive. Farrand is privileged. Farrand is fatuous. Farrand is conducive. All conducive things are ajar. Red things are formalised. If something is everyday and privileged then it is fatuous. All formalised, fatuous things are everyday. If something is fatuous and formalised then it is conducive. Round, formalised things are privileged. Farrand is formalised.", "logic": "\nAdorable(connor)\nFormalised(connor)\nAjar(connor)\nPrivileged(connor)\nEveryday(connor)\nFatuous(connor)\nConducive(connor)\nPrivileged(farrand)\nFatuous(farrand)\nConducive(farrand)\nforall x (Conducive(x) -> Ajar(x))\nforall x (Ajar(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) and Privileged(x) -> Fatuous(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) and Fatuous(x) -> Everyday(x))\nforall x (Fatuous(x) and Formalised(x) -> Conducive(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) and Formalised(x) -> Privileged(x))\n\nFormalised(farrand)\n\nConducive(farrand) and forall x (Conducive(x) -> Ajar(x)) -> therefore Ajar(farrand) Ajar(farrand) and forall x (Ajar(x) -> Formalised(x)) -> therefore Formalised(farrand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Horst is towering. Horst is coming. Horst is zodiacal. Horst is leathery. Horst is lamarckian. Horst is twofold. Horst is adoring. Dea is leathery. Dea is twofold. Dea is adoring. All adoring things are zodiacal. Red things are coming. If something is lamarckian and leathery then it is twofold. All coming, twofold things are lamarckian. If something is twofold and coming then it is adoring. Round, coming things are leathery. Dea is not coming.", "logic": "\nTowering(horst)\nComing(horst)\nZodiacal(horst)\nLeathery(horst)\nLamarckian(horst)\nTwofold(horst)\nAdoring(horst)\nLeathery(dea)\nTwofold(dea)\nAdoring(dea)\nforall x (Adoring(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\nforall x (Zodiacal(x) -> Coming(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) and Leathery(x) -> Twofold(x))\nforall x (Coming(x) and Twofold(x) -> Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Twofold(x) and Coming(x) -> Adoring(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) and Coming(x) -> Leathery(x))\n\nnot Coming(dea)\n\nAdoring(dea) and forall x (Adoring(x) -> Zodiacal(x)) -> therefore Zodiacal(dea) Zodiacal(dea) and forall x (Zodiacal(x) -> Coming(x)) -> therefore Coming(dea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Lianna is harmonious. Lianna is wayfaring. Lianna is unobvious. Lianna is slanderous. Lianna is navigable. Lianna is crocketed. Lianna is hypnotised. Samuella is slanderous. Samuella is crocketed. Samuella is hypnotised. All hypnotised things are unobvious. Red things are wayfaring. If something is navigable and slanderous then it is crocketed. All wayfaring, crocketed things are navigable. If something is crocketed and wayfaring then it is hypnotised. Round, wayfaring things are slanderous. Samuella is navigable.", "logic": "\nHarmonious(lianna)\nWayfaring(lianna)\nUnobvious(lianna)\nSlanderous(lianna)\nNavigable(lianna)\nCrocketed(lianna)\nHypnotised(lianna)\nSlanderous(samuella)\nCrocketed(samuella)\nHypnotised(samuella)\nforall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Unobvious(x))\nforall x (Unobvious(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Navigable(x) and Slanderous(x) -> Crocketed(x))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Navigable(x))\nforall x (Crocketed(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\nforall x (Navigable(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> Slanderous(x))\n\nNavigable(samuella)\n\nHypnotised(samuella) and forall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Unobvious(x)) -> therefore Unobvious(samuella) Unobvious(samuella) and forall x (Unobvious(x) -> Wayfaring(x)) -> therefore Wayfaring(samuella) Wayfaring(samuella) and Crocketed(samuella) and forall x (Wayfaring(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Navigable(x)) -> therefore Navigable(samuella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Brody is distressed. Brody is gallic. Brody is checkered. Brody is unfeminine. Brody is snuff. Brody is skittish. Brody is sisterly. Marla is unfeminine. Marla is skittish. Marla is sisterly. All sisterly things are checkered. Red things are gallic. If something is snuff and unfeminine then it is skittish. All gallic, skittish things are snuff. If something is skittish and gallic then it is sisterly. Round, gallic things are unfeminine. Marla is not snuff.", "logic": "\nDistressed(brody)\nGallic(brody)\nCheckered(brody)\nUnfeminine(brody)\nSnuff(brody)\nSkittish(brody)\nSisterly(brody)\nUnfeminine(marla)\nSkittish(marla)\nSisterly(marla)\nforall x (Sisterly(x) -> Checkered(x))\nforall x (Checkered(x) -> Gallic(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x) and Unfeminine(x) -> Skittish(x))\nforall x (Gallic(x) and Skittish(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Skittish(x) and Gallic(x) -> Sisterly(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x) and Gallic(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\n\nnot Snuff(marla)\n\nSisterly(marla) and forall x (Sisterly(x) -> Checkered(x)) -> therefore Checkered(marla) Checkered(marla) and forall x (Checkered(x) -> Gallic(x)) -> therefore Gallic(marla) Gallic(marla) and Skittish(marla) and forall x (Gallic(x) and Skittish(x) -> Snuff(x)) -> therefore Snuff(marla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Dewitt is not majestic. Obadias is not coseismic. Obadias is sunny. Obadias is majestic. Obadias is not undercover. Magnum is circinate. Magnum is undercover. Almire is porous. Almire is not majestic. Almire is undercover. Smart people are coseismic. If someone is coseismic then they are circinate. If someone is circinate then they are not adscripted. If Dewitt is coseismic and Dewitt is adscripted then Dewitt is sunny. All adscripted, circinate people are majestic. If Obadias is coseismic and Obadias is porous then Obadias is sunny. Smart people are porous. If someone is undercover and not circinate then they are not porous. Magnum is circinate.", "logic": "\nnot Majestic(dewitt)\nnot Coseismic(obadias)\nSunny(obadias)\nMajestic(obadias)\nnot Undercover(obadias)\nCircinate(magnum)\nUndercover(magnum)\nPorous(almire)\nnot Majestic(almire)\nUndercover(almire)\nforall x (Undercover(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) -> Circinate(x))\nforall x (Circinate(x) -> not Adscripted(x))\nCoseismic(dewitt) and Adscripted(dewitt) -> Sunny(dewitt)\nforall x (Adscripted(x) and Circinate(x) -> Majestic(x))\nCoseismic(obadias) and Porous(obadias) -> Sunny(obadias)\nforall x (Undercover(x) -> Porous(x))\nforall x (Undercover(x) and not Circinate(x) -> not Porous(x))\n\nCircinate(magnum)\n\ntherefore Circinate(magnum)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Thomasin is not commercial. Latashia is not surviving. Latashia is ungenerous. Latashia is commercial. Latashia is not disgraced. Nara is angled. Nara is disgraced. Francesca is multistory. Francesca is not commercial. Francesca is disgraced. Smart people are surviving. If someone is surviving then they are angled. If someone is angled then they are not deboned. If Thomasin is surviving and Thomasin is deboned then Thomasin is ungenerous. All deboned, angled people are commercial. If Latashia is surviving and Latashia is multistory then Latashia is ungenerous. Smart people are multistory. If someone is disgraced and not angled then they are not multistory. Nara is not angled.", "logic": "\nnot Commercial(thomasin)\nnot Surviving(latashia)\nUngenerous(latashia)\nCommercial(latashia)\nnot Disgraced(latashia)\nAngled(nara)\nDisgraced(nara)\nMultistory(francesca)\nnot Commercial(francesca)\nDisgraced(francesca)\nforall x (Disgraced(x) -> Surviving(x))\nforall x (Surviving(x) -> Angled(x))\nforall x (Angled(x) -> not Deboned(x))\nSurviving(thomasin) and Deboned(thomasin) -> Ungenerous(thomasin)\nforall x (Deboned(x) and Angled(x) -> Commercial(x))\nSurviving(latashia) and Multistory(latashia) -> Ungenerous(latashia)\nforall x (Disgraced(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) and not Angled(x) -> not Multistory(x))\n\nnot Angled(nara)\n\ntherefore Angled(nara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Madalyn is not abreast. Sallyanne is not delighted. Sallyanne is exocrine. Sallyanne is abreast. Sallyanne is not determined. Bridgett is unbooked. Bridgett is determined. Blaire is piratical. Blaire is not abreast. Blaire is determined. Smart people are delighted. If someone is delighted then they are unbooked. If someone is unbooked then they are not inpouring. If Madalyn is delighted and Madalyn is inpouring then Madalyn is exocrine. All inpouring, unbooked people are abreast. If Sallyanne is delighted and Sallyanne is piratical then Sallyanne is exocrine. Smart people are piratical. If someone is determined and not unbooked then they are not piratical. Bridgett is piratical.", "logic": "\nnot Abreast(madalyn)\nnot Delighted(sallyanne)\nExocrine(sallyanne)\nAbreast(sallyanne)\nnot Determined(sallyanne)\nUnbooked(bridgett)\nDetermined(bridgett)\nPiratical(blaire)\nnot Abreast(blaire)\nDetermined(blaire)\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Delighted(x) -> Unbooked(x))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) -> not Inpouring(x))\nDelighted(madalyn) and Inpouring(madalyn) -> Exocrine(madalyn)\nforall x (Inpouring(x) and Unbooked(x) -> Abreast(x))\nDelighted(sallyanne) and Piratical(sallyanne) -> Exocrine(sallyanne)\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Piratical(x))\nforall x (Determined(x) and not Unbooked(x) -> not Piratical(x))\n\nPiratical(bridgett)\n\nDetermined(bridgett) and forall x (Determined(x) -> Piratical(x)) -> therefore Piratical(bridgett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Andreana is not disgusting. Venus is not defending. Venus is berserk. Venus is disgusting. Venus is not semite. Grant is rotary. Grant is semite. Paulina is unfrozen. Paulina is not disgusting. Paulina is semite. Smart people are defending. If someone is defending then they are rotary. If someone is rotary then they are not tilted. If Andreana is defending and Andreana is tilted then Andreana is berserk. All tilted, rotary people are disgusting. If Venus is defending and Venus is unfrozen then Venus is berserk. Smart people are unfrozen. If someone is semite and not rotary then they are not unfrozen. Grant is tilted.", "logic": "\nnot Disgusting(andreana)\nnot Defending(venus)\nBerserk(venus)\nDisgusting(venus)\nnot Semite(venus)\nRotary(grant)\nSemite(grant)\nUnfrozen(paulina)\nnot Disgusting(paulina)\nSemite(paulina)\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Defending(x))\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Rotary(x))\nforall x (Rotary(x) -> not Tilted(x))\nDefending(andreana) and Tilted(andreana) -> Berserk(andreana)\nforall x (Tilted(x) and Rotary(x) -> Disgusting(x))\nDefending(venus) and Unfrozen(venus) -> Berserk(venus)\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Unfrozen(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) and not Rotary(x) -> not Unfrozen(x))\n\nTilted(grant)\n\nRotary(grant) and forall x (Rotary(x) -> not Tilted(x)) -> therefore not Tilted(grant)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Babara is not lossy. Dimitry is not smug. Dimitry is sensitive. Dimitry is lossy. Dimitry is not detonative. Petey is bizarre. Petey is detonative. Mary is syrian. Mary is not lossy. Mary is detonative. Smart people are smug. If someone is smug then they are bizarre. If someone is bizarre then they are not unbolted. If Babara is smug and Babara is unbolted then Babara is sensitive. All unbolted, bizarre people are lossy. If Dimitry is smug and Dimitry is syrian then Dimitry is sensitive. Smart people are syrian. If someone is detonative and not bizarre then they are not syrian. Mary is bizarre.", "logic": "\nnot Lossy(babara)\nnot Smug(dimitry)\nSensitive(dimitry)\nLossy(dimitry)\nnot Detonative(dimitry)\nBizarre(petey)\nDetonative(petey)\nSyrian(mary)\nnot Lossy(mary)\nDetonative(mary)\nforall x (Detonative(x) -> Smug(x))\nforall x (Smug(x) -> Bizarre(x))\nforall x (Bizarre(x) -> not Unbolted(x))\nSmug(babara) and Unbolted(babara) -> Sensitive(babara)\nforall x (Unbolted(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Lossy(x))\nSmug(dimitry) and Syrian(dimitry) -> Sensitive(dimitry)\nforall x (Detonative(x) -> Syrian(x))\nforall x (Detonative(x) and not Bizarre(x) -> not Syrian(x))\n\nBizarre(mary)\n\nDetonative(mary) and forall x (Detonative(x) -> Smug(x)) -> therefore Smug(mary) Smug(mary) and forall x (Smug(x) -> Bizarre(x)) -> therefore Bizarre(mary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Licha is not unshaven. Katheryn is not celluloid. Katheryn is univalent. Katheryn is unshaven. Katheryn is not cobwebby. Clemmie is electrical. Clemmie is cobwebby. Moore is pocketable. Moore is not unshaven. Moore is cobwebby. Smart people are celluloid. If someone is celluloid then they are electrical. If someone is electrical then they are not uneducated. If Licha is celluloid and Licha is uneducated then Licha is univalent. All uneducated, electrical people are unshaven. If Katheryn is celluloid and Katheryn is pocketable then Katheryn is univalent. Smart people are pocketable. If someone is cobwebby and not electrical then they are not pocketable. Moore is not electrical.", "logic": "\nnot Unshaven(licha)\nnot Celluloid(katheryn)\nUnivalent(katheryn)\nUnshaven(katheryn)\nnot Cobwebby(katheryn)\nElectrical(clemmie)\nCobwebby(clemmie)\nPocketable(moore)\nnot Unshaven(moore)\nCobwebby(moore)\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Celluloid(x) -> Electrical(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) -> not Uneducated(x))\nCelluloid(licha) and Uneducated(licha) -> Univalent(licha)\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Electrical(x) -> Unshaven(x))\nCelluloid(katheryn) and Pocketable(katheryn) -> Univalent(katheryn)\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) -> Pocketable(x))\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) and not Electrical(x) -> not Pocketable(x))\n\nnot Electrical(moore)\n\nCobwebby(moore) and forall x (Cobwebby(x) -> Celluloid(x)) -> therefore Celluloid(moore) Celluloid(moore) and forall x (Celluloid(x) -> Electrical(x)) -> therefore Electrical(moore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Orbadiah is not anecdotal. Jae is not crumpled. Jae is blinking. Jae is anecdotal. Jae is not moneran. Hesther is canted. Hesther is moneran. Floris is napoleonic. Floris is not anecdotal. Floris is moneran. Smart people are crumpled. If someone is crumpled then they are canted. If someone is canted then they are not xenophobic. If Orbadiah is crumpled and Orbadiah is xenophobic then Orbadiah is blinking. All xenophobic, canted people are anecdotal. If Jae is crumpled and Jae is napoleonic then Jae is blinking. Smart people are napoleonic. If someone is moneran and not canted then they are not napoleonic. Floris is not xenophobic.", "logic": "\nnot Anecdotal(orbadiah)\nnot Crumpled(jae)\nBlinking(jae)\nAnecdotal(jae)\nnot Moneran(jae)\nCanted(hesther)\nMoneran(hesther)\nNapoleonic(floris)\nnot Anecdotal(floris)\nMoneran(floris)\nforall x (Moneran(x) -> Crumpled(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) -> Canted(x))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> not Xenophobic(x))\nCrumpled(orbadiah) and Xenophobic(orbadiah) -> Blinking(orbadiah)\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and Canted(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\nCrumpled(jae) and Napoleonic(jae) -> Blinking(jae)\nforall x (Moneran(x) -> Napoleonic(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) and not Canted(x) -> not Napoleonic(x))\n\nnot Xenophobic(floris)\n\nMoneran(floris) and forall x (Moneran(x) -> Crumpled(x)) -> therefore Crumpled(floris) Crumpled(floris) and forall x (Crumpled(x) -> Canted(x)) -> therefore Canted(floris) Canted(floris) and forall x (Canted(x) -> not Xenophobic(x)) -> therefore not Xenophobic(floris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Heinrich is not runaway. Mart is not upfront. Mart is infected. Mart is runaway. Mart is not chechen. Karsten is acinous. Karsten is chechen. Maureene is capacitive. Maureene is not runaway. Maureene is chechen. Smart people are upfront. If someone is upfront then they are acinous. If someone is acinous then they are not dolabrate. If Heinrich is upfront and Heinrich is dolabrate then Heinrich is infected. All dolabrate, acinous people are runaway. If Mart is upfront and Mart is capacitive then Mart is infected. Smart people are capacitive. If someone is chechen and not acinous then they are not capacitive. Maureene is dolabrate.", "logic": "\nnot Runaway(heinrich)\nnot Upfront(mart)\nInfected(mart)\nRunaway(mart)\nnot Chechen(mart)\nAcinous(karsten)\nChechen(karsten)\nCapacitive(maureene)\nnot Runaway(maureene)\nChechen(maureene)\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Upfront(x))\nforall x (Upfront(x) -> Acinous(x))\nforall x (Acinous(x) -> not Dolabrate(x))\nUpfront(heinrich) and Dolabrate(heinrich) -> Infected(heinrich)\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) and Acinous(x) -> Runaway(x))\nUpfront(mart) and Capacitive(mart) -> Infected(mart)\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nforall x (Chechen(x) and not Acinous(x) -> not Capacitive(x))\n\nDolabrate(maureene)\n\nChechen(maureene) and forall x (Chechen(x) -> Upfront(x)) -> therefore Upfront(maureene) Upfront(maureene) and forall x (Upfront(x) -> Acinous(x)) -> therefore Acinous(maureene) Acinous(maureene) and forall x (Acinous(x) -> not Dolabrate(x)) -> therefore not Dolabrate(maureene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Gypsy is not songful. Urson is not immotile. Urson is bimanual. Urson is songful. Urson is not antic. Mareah is praetorian. Mareah is antic. Antoine is uncoerced. Antoine is not songful. Antoine is antic. Smart people are immotile. If someone is immotile then they are praetorian. If someone is praetorian then they are not altaic. If Gypsy is immotile and Gypsy is altaic then Gypsy is bimanual. All altaic, praetorian people are songful. If Urson is immotile and Urson is uncoerced then Urson is bimanual. Smart people are uncoerced. If someone is antic and not praetorian then they are not uncoerced. Gypsy is not immotile.", "logic": "\nnot Songful(gypsy)\nnot Immotile(urson)\nBimanual(urson)\nSongful(urson)\nnot Antic(urson)\nPraetorian(mareah)\nAntic(mareah)\nUncoerced(antoine)\nnot Songful(antoine)\nAntic(antoine)\nforall x (Antic(x) -> Immotile(x))\nforall x (Immotile(x) -> Praetorian(x))\nforall x (Praetorian(x) -> not Altaic(x))\nImmotile(gypsy) and Altaic(gypsy) -> Bimanual(gypsy)\nforall x (Altaic(x) and Praetorian(x) -> Songful(x))\nImmotile(urson) and Uncoerced(urson) -> Bimanual(urson)\nforall x (Antic(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Antic(x) and not Praetorian(x) -> not Uncoerced(x))\n\nnot Immotile(gypsy)\n\nforall x (Antic(x) -> Immotile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Margy is not straying. Kayley is not swart. Kayley is thinkable. Kayley is straying. Kayley is not obstetric. Mamie is edified. Mamie is obstetric. Carolee is derogatory. Carolee is not straying. Carolee is obstetric. Smart people are swart. If someone is swart then they are edified. If someone is edified then they are not airy. If Margy is swart and Margy is airy then Margy is thinkable. All airy, edified people are straying. If Kayley is swart and Kayley is derogatory then Kayley is thinkable. Smart people are derogatory. If someone is obstetric and not edified then they are not derogatory. Margy is derogatory.", "logic": "\nnot Straying(margy)\nnot Swart(kayley)\nThinkable(kayley)\nStraying(kayley)\nnot Obstetric(kayley)\nEdified(mamie)\nObstetric(mamie)\nDerogatory(carolee)\nnot Straying(carolee)\nObstetric(carolee)\nforall x (Obstetric(x) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Swart(x) -> Edified(x))\nforall x (Edified(x) -> not Airy(x))\nSwart(margy) and Airy(margy) -> Thinkable(margy)\nforall x (Airy(x) and Edified(x) -> Straying(x))\nSwart(kayley) and Derogatory(kayley) -> Thinkable(kayley)\nforall x (Obstetric(x) -> Derogatory(x))\nforall x (Obstetric(x) and not Edified(x) -> not Derogatory(x))\n\nDerogatory(margy)\n\nforall x (Obstetric(x) -> Derogatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Elberta is not rhyming. Monte is not unsecured. Monte is southerly. Monte is rhyming. Monte is not twoscore. Fidel is pomaded. Fidel is twoscore. Esau is reassuring. Esau is not rhyming. Esau is twoscore. Smart people are unsecured. If someone is unsecured then they are pomaded. If someone is pomaded then they are not confirmed. If Elberta is unsecured and Elberta is confirmed then Elberta is southerly. All confirmed, pomaded people are rhyming. If Monte is unsecured and Monte is reassuring then Monte is southerly. Smart people are reassuring. If someone is twoscore and not pomaded then they are not reassuring. Monte is not reassuring.", "logic": "\nnot Rhyming(elberta)\nnot Unsecured(monte)\nSoutherly(monte)\nRhyming(monte)\nnot Twoscore(monte)\nPomaded(fidel)\nTwoscore(fidel)\nReassuring(esau)\nnot Rhyming(esau)\nTwoscore(esau)\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Unsecured(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) -> Pomaded(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) -> not Confirmed(x))\nUnsecured(elberta) and Confirmed(elberta) -> Southerly(elberta)\nforall x (Confirmed(x) and Pomaded(x) -> Rhyming(x))\nUnsecured(monte) and Reassuring(monte) -> Southerly(monte)\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Reassuring(x))\nforall x (Twoscore(x) and not Pomaded(x) -> not Reassuring(x))\n\nnot Reassuring(monte)\n\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Reassuring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Margarete is not chockful. Jada is not unmovable. Jada is fairish. Jada is chockful. Jada is not phenotypic. Kissie is overbusy. Kissie is phenotypic. Riccardo is stoppable. Riccardo is not chockful. Riccardo is phenotypic. Smart people are unmovable. If someone is unmovable then they are overbusy. If someone is overbusy then they are not tubby. If Margarete is unmovable and Margarete is tubby then Margarete is fairish. All tubby, overbusy people are chockful. If Jada is unmovable and Jada is stoppable then Jada is fairish. Smart people are stoppable. If someone is phenotypic and not overbusy then they are not stoppable. Margarete is fairish.", "logic": "\nnot Chockful(margarete)\nnot Unmovable(jada)\nFairish(jada)\nChockful(jada)\nnot Phenotypic(jada)\nOverbusy(kissie)\nPhenotypic(kissie)\nStoppable(riccardo)\nnot Chockful(riccardo)\nPhenotypic(riccardo)\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) -> Unmovable(x))\nforall x (Unmovable(x) -> Overbusy(x))\nforall x (Overbusy(x) -> not Tubby(x))\nUnmovable(margarete) and Tubby(margarete) -> Fairish(margarete)\nforall x (Tubby(x) and Overbusy(x) -> Chockful(x))\nUnmovable(jada) and Stoppable(jada) -> Fairish(jada)\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) and not Overbusy(x) -> not Stoppable(x))\n\nFairish(margarete)\n\nUnmovable(margarete) and Tubby(margarete) -> Fairish(margarete) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Austin is not clubable. Jethro is not ambrosian. Jethro is meshed. Jethro is clubable. Jethro is not sunburnt. Raina is segmental. Raina is sunburnt. Jillayne is pedagogic. Jillayne is not clubable. Jillayne is sunburnt. Smart people are ambrosian. If someone is ambrosian then they are segmental. If someone is segmental then they are not sundried. If Austin is ambrosian and Austin is sundried then Austin is meshed. All sundried, segmental people are clubable. If Jethro is ambrosian and Jethro is pedagogic then Jethro is meshed. Smart people are pedagogic. If someone is sunburnt and not segmental then they are not pedagogic. Raina is not meshed.", "logic": "\nnot Clubable(austin)\nnot Ambrosian(jethro)\nMeshed(jethro)\nClubable(jethro)\nnot Sunburnt(jethro)\nSegmental(raina)\nSunburnt(raina)\nPedagogic(jillayne)\nnot Clubable(jillayne)\nSunburnt(jillayne)\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Segmental(x))\nforall x (Segmental(x) -> not Sundried(x))\nAmbrosian(austin) and Sundried(austin) -> Meshed(austin)\nforall x (Sundried(x) and Segmental(x) -> Clubable(x))\nAmbrosian(jethro) and Pedagogic(jethro) -> Meshed(jethro)\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Pedagogic(x))\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) and not Segmental(x) -> not Pedagogic(x))\n\nnot Meshed(raina)\n\nnot Meshed(raina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Tab is not attended. Dolli is not spiraling. Dolli is jolty. Dolli is attended. Dolli is not whatsoever. Nalani is satisfied. Nalani is whatsoever. Mikael is unwise. Mikael is not attended. Mikael is whatsoever. Smart people are spiraling. If someone is spiraling then they are satisfied. If someone is satisfied then they are not dinky. If Tab is spiraling and Tab is dinky then Tab is jolty. All dinky, satisfied people are attended. If Dolli is spiraling and Dolli is unwise then Dolli is jolty. Smart people are unwise. If someone is whatsoever and not satisfied then they are not unwise. Tab is whatsoever.", "logic": "\nnot Attended(tab)\nnot Spiraling(dolli)\nJolty(dolli)\nAttended(dolli)\nnot Whatsoever(dolli)\nSatisfied(nalani)\nWhatsoever(nalani)\nUnwise(mikael)\nnot Attended(mikael)\nWhatsoever(mikael)\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Spiraling(x))\nforall x (Spiraling(x) -> Satisfied(x))\nforall x (Satisfied(x) -> not Dinky(x))\nSpiraling(tab) and Dinky(tab) -> Jolty(tab)\nforall x (Dinky(x) and Satisfied(x) -> Attended(x))\nSpiraling(dolli) and Unwise(dolli) -> Jolty(dolli)\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) and not Satisfied(x) -> not Unwise(x))\n\nWhatsoever(tab)\n\nWhatsoever(tab) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Ajai is not halt. Giff is not chummy. Giff is takeout. Giff is halt. Giff is not clanking. Elvira is owing. Elvira is clanking. Carlen is floored. Carlen is not halt. Carlen is clanking. Smart people are chummy. If someone is chummy then they are owing. If someone is owing then they are not tagged. If Ajai is chummy and Ajai is tagged then Ajai is takeout. All tagged, owing people are halt. If Giff is chummy and Giff is floored then Giff is takeout. Smart people are floored. If someone is clanking and not owing then they are not floored. Carlen is not takeout.", "logic": "\nnot Halt(ajai)\nnot Chummy(giff)\nTakeout(giff)\nHalt(giff)\nnot Clanking(giff)\nOwing(elvira)\nClanking(elvira)\nFloored(carlen)\nnot Halt(carlen)\nClanking(carlen)\nforall x (Clanking(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Owing(x))\nforall x (Owing(x) -> not Tagged(x))\nChummy(ajai) and Tagged(ajai) -> Takeout(ajai)\nforall x (Tagged(x) and Owing(x) -> Halt(x))\nChummy(giff) and Floored(giff) -> Takeout(giff)\nforall x (Clanking(x) -> Floored(x))\nforall x (Clanking(x) and not Owing(x) -> not Floored(x))\n\nnot Takeout(carlen)\n\nnot Takeout(carlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Viviene is not millennial. Willie is not amphoteric. Willie is narrowing. Willie is millennial. Willie is not stubborn. Nickey is methodist. Nickey is stubborn. Orelee is vaccinated. Orelee is not millennial. Orelee is stubborn. Smart people are amphoteric. If someone is amphoteric then they are methodist. If someone is methodist then they are not petallike. If Viviene is amphoteric and Viviene is petallike then Viviene is narrowing. All petallike, methodist people are millennial. If Willie is amphoteric and Willie is vaccinated then Willie is narrowing. Smart people are vaccinated. If someone is stubborn and not methodist then they are not vaccinated. Viviene is petallike.", "logic": "\nnot Millennial(viviene)\nnot Amphoteric(willie)\nNarrowing(willie)\nMillennial(willie)\nnot Stubborn(willie)\nMethodist(nickey)\nStubborn(nickey)\nVaccinated(orelee)\nnot Millennial(orelee)\nStubborn(orelee)\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Amphoteric(x))\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) -> Methodist(x))\nforall x (Methodist(x) -> not Petallike(x))\nAmphoteric(viviene) and Petallike(viviene) -> Narrowing(viviene)\nforall x (Petallike(x) and Methodist(x) -> Millennial(x))\nAmphoteric(willie) and Vaccinated(willie) -> Narrowing(willie)\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) and not Methodist(x) -> not Vaccinated(x))\n\nPetallike(viviene)\n\nPetallike(viviene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "The cam tabularise the noble. The cam is demanding. The cam is virile. The cam cage the noble. The cam levitate the noble. The noble tabularise the cam. The noble is demanding. The noble is culpable. The noble is virile. The noble levitate the cam. If something levitate the cam and it cage the cam then it levitate the noble. If something is culpable then it cage the noble. If something levitate the cam then it is demanding. If the noble levitate the cam and the noble cage the cam then the noble is incised. If something cage the noble then it cage the cam. If something is virile then it tabularise the noble. The noble is virile.", "logic": "\nTabularise(cam, noble)\nDemanding(cam)\nVirile(cam)\nCage(cam, noble)\nLevitate(cam, noble)\nTabularise(noble, cam)\nDemanding(noble)\nCulpable(noble)\nVirile(noble)\nLevitate(noble, cam)\nforall x (Levitate(x, cam) and Cage(x, cam) -> Levitate(x, noble))\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Cage(x, noble))\nforall x (Levitate(x, cam) -> Demanding(x))\nLevitate(noble, cam) and Cage(noble, cam) -> Incised(noble)\nforall x (Cage(x, noble) -> Cage(x, cam))\nforall x (Virile(x) -> Tabularise(x, noble))\n\nVirile(noble)\n\ntherefore Virile(noble)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The sandra corkscrew the dulciana. The sandra is roughish. The sandra is inborn. The sandra mapquest the dulciana. The sandra bushel the dulciana. The dulciana corkscrew the sandra. The dulciana is roughish. The dulciana is unsought. The dulciana is inborn. The dulciana bushel the sandra. If something bushel the sandra and it mapquest the sandra then it bushel the dulciana. If something is unsought then it mapquest the dulciana. If something bushel the sandra then it is roughish. If the dulciana bushel the sandra and the dulciana mapquest the sandra then the dulciana is essene. If something mapquest the dulciana then it mapquest the sandra. If something is inborn then it corkscrew the dulciana. The sandra does not see the dulciana.", "logic": "\nCorkscrew(sandra, dulciana)\nRoughish(sandra)\nInborn(sandra)\nMapquest(sandra, dulciana)\nBushel(sandra, dulciana)\nCorkscrew(dulciana, sandra)\nRoughish(dulciana)\nUnsought(dulciana)\nInborn(dulciana)\nBushel(dulciana, sandra)\nforall x (Bushel(x, sandra) and Mapquest(x, sandra) -> Bushel(x, dulciana))\nforall x (Unsought(x) -> Mapquest(x, dulciana))\nforall x (Bushel(x, sandra) -> Roughish(x))\nBushel(dulciana, sandra) and Mapquest(dulciana, sandra) -> Essene(dulciana)\nforall x (Mapquest(x, dulciana) -> Mapquest(x, sandra))\nforall x (Inborn(x) -> Corkscrew(x, dulciana))\n\nnot Bushel(sandra, dulciana)\n\ntherefore Bushel(sandra, dulciana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The corie coincide the kelwin. The corie is secular. The corie is flaming. The corie veer the kelwin. The corie shell the kelwin. The kelwin coincide the corie. The kelwin is secular. The kelwin is anterior. The kelwin is flaming. The kelwin shell the corie. If something shell the corie and it veer the corie then it shell the kelwin. If something is anterior then it veer the kelwin. If something shell the corie then it is secular. If the kelwin shell the corie and the kelwin veer the corie then the kelwin is sudsy. If something veer the kelwin then it veer the corie. If something is flaming then it coincide the kelwin. The kelwin veer the kelwin.", "logic": "\nCoincide(corie, kelwin)\nSecular(corie)\nFlaming(corie)\nVeer(corie, kelwin)\nShell(corie, kelwin)\nCoincide(kelwin, corie)\nSecular(kelwin)\nAnterior(kelwin)\nFlaming(kelwin)\nShell(kelwin, corie)\nforall x (Shell(x, corie) and Veer(x, corie) -> Shell(x, kelwin))\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Veer(x, kelwin))\nforall x (Shell(x, corie) -> Secular(x))\nShell(kelwin, corie) and Veer(kelwin, corie) -> Sudsy(kelwin)\nforall x (Veer(x, kelwin) -> Veer(x, corie))\nforall x (Flaming(x) -> Coincide(x, kelwin))\n\nVeer(kelwin, kelwin)\n\nAnterior(kelwin) and forall x (Anterior(x) -> Veer(x, kelwin)) -> therefore Veer(kelwin, kelwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The pyotr mechanize the harwell. The pyotr is jittery. The pyotr is luxurious. The pyotr awake the harwell. The pyotr refloat the harwell. The harwell mechanize the pyotr. The harwell is jittery. The harwell is atheist. The harwell is luxurious. The harwell refloat the pyotr. If something refloat the pyotr and it awake the pyotr then it refloat the harwell. If something is atheist then it awake the harwell. If something refloat the pyotr then it is jittery. If the harwell refloat the pyotr and the harwell awake the pyotr then the harwell is liberated. If something awake the harwell then it awake the pyotr. If something is luxurious then it mechanize the harwell. The harwell does not need the harwell.", "logic": "\nMechanize(pyotr, harwell)\nJittery(pyotr)\nLuxurious(pyotr)\nAwake(pyotr, harwell)\nRefloat(pyotr, harwell)\nMechanize(harwell, pyotr)\nJittery(harwell)\nAtheist(harwell)\nLuxurious(harwell)\nRefloat(harwell, pyotr)\nforall x (Refloat(x, pyotr) and Awake(x, pyotr) -> Refloat(x, harwell))\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Awake(x, harwell))\nforall x (Refloat(x, pyotr) -> Jittery(x))\nRefloat(harwell, pyotr) and Awake(harwell, pyotr) -> Liberated(harwell)\nforall x (Awake(x, harwell) -> Awake(x, pyotr))\nforall x (Luxurious(x) -> Mechanize(x, harwell))\n\nnot Awake(harwell, harwell)\n\nAtheist(harwell) and forall x (Atheist(x) -> Awake(x, harwell)) -> therefore Awake(harwell, harwell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The alanah topdress the yehudit. The alanah is macedonian. The alanah is conversant. The alanah retract the yehudit. The alanah work the yehudit. The yehudit topdress the alanah. The yehudit is macedonian. The yehudit is spongelike. The yehudit is conversant. The yehudit work the alanah. If something work the alanah and it retract the alanah then it work the yehudit. If something is spongelike then it retract the yehudit. If something work the alanah then it is macedonian. If the yehudit work the alanah and the yehudit retract the alanah then the yehudit is asteriated. If something retract the yehudit then it retract the alanah. If something is conversant then it topdress the yehudit. The yehudit retract the alanah.", "logic": "\nTopdress(alanah, yehudit)\nMacedonian(alanah)\nConversant(alanah)\nRetract(alanah, yehudit)\nWork(alanah, yehudit)\nTopdress(yehudit, alanah)\nMacedonian(yehudit)\nSpongelike(yehudit)\nConversant(yehudit)\nWork(yehudit, alanah)\nforall x (Work(x, alanah) and Retract(x, alanah) -> Work(x, yehudit))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) -> Retract(x, yehudit))\nforall x (Work(x, alanah) -> Macedonian(x))\nWork(yehudit, alanah) and Retract(yehudit, alanah) -> Asteriated(yehudit)\nforall x (Retract(x, yehudit) -> Retract(x, alanah))\nforall x (Conversant(x) -> Topdress(x, yehudit))\n\nRetract(yehudit, alanah)\n\nSpongelike(yehudit) and forall x (Spongelike(x) -> Retract(x, yehudit)) -> therefore Retract(yehudit, yehudit) Retract(yehudit, yehudit) and forall x (Retract(x, yehudit) -> Retract(x, alanah)) -> therefore Retract(yehudit, alanah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The sydel dehisce the katinka. The sydel is overhand. The sydel is biradial. The sydel polychrome the katinka. The sydel circumvent the katinka. The katinka dehisce the sydel. The katinka is overhand. The katinka is plotted. The katinka is biradial. The katinka circumvent the sydel. If something circumvent the sydel and it polychrome the sydel then it circumvent the katinka. If something is plotted then it polychrome the katinka. If something circumvent the sydel then it is overhand. If the katinka circumvent the sydel and the katinka polychrome the sydel then the katinka is holophytic. If something polychrome the katinka then it polychrome the sydel. If something is biradial then it dehisce the katinka. The katinka does not need the sydel.", "logic": "\nDehisce(sydel, katinka)\nOverhand(sydel)\nBiradial(sydel)\nPolychrome(sydel, katinka)\nCircumvent(sydel, katinka)\nDehisce(katinka, sydel)\nOverhand(katinka)\nPlotted(katinka)\nBiradial(katinka)\nCircumvent(katinka, sydel)\nforall x (Circumvent(x, sydel) and Polychrome(x, sydel) -> Circumvent(x, katinka))\nforall x (Plotted(x) -> Polychrome(x, katinka))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, sydel) -> Overhand(x))\nCircumvent(katinka, sydel) and Polychrome(katinka, sydel) -> Holophytic(katinka)\nforall x (Polychrome(x, katinka) -> Polychrome(x, sydel))\nforall x (Biradial(x) -> Dehisce(x, katinka))\n\nnot Polychrome(katinka, sydel)\n\nPlotted(katinka) and forall x (Plotted(x) -> Polychrome(x, katinka)) -> therefore Polychrome(katinka, katinka) Polychrome(katinka, katinka) and forall x (Polychrome(x, katinka) -> Polychrome(x, sydel)) -> therefore Polychrome(katinka, sydel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The gweneth islamise the alana. The gweneth is cardinal. The gweneth is bronzed. The gweneth disgruntle the alana. The gweneth somersault the alana. The alana islamise the gweneth. The alana is cardinal. The alana is saddled. The alana is bronzed. The alana somersault the gweneth. If something somersault the gweneth and it disgruntle the gweneth then it somersault the alana. If something is saddled then it disgruntle the alana. If something somersault the gweneth then it is cardinal. If the alana somersault the gweneth and the alana disgruntle the gweneth then the alana is interior. If something disgruntle the alana then it disgruntle the gweneth. If something is bronzed then it islamise the alana. The alana somersault the alana.", "logic": "\nIslamise(gweneth, alana)\nCardinal(gweneth)\nBronzed(gweneth)\nDisgruntle(gweneth, alana)\nSomersault(gweneth, alana)\nIslamise(alana, gweneth)\nCardinal(alana)\nSaddled(alana)\nBronzed(alana)\nSomersault(alana, gweneth)\nforall x (Somersault(x, gweneth) and Disgruntle(x, gweneth) -> Somersault(x, alana))\nforall x (Saddled(x) -> Disgruntle(x, alana))\nforall x (Somersault(x, gweneth) -> Cardinal(x))\nSomersault(alana, gweneth) and Disgruntle(alana, gweneth) -> Interior(alana)\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, alana) -> Disgruntle(x, gweneth))\nforall x (Bronzed(x) -> Islamise(x, alana))\n\nSomersault(alana, alana)\n\nSaddled(alana) and forall x (Saddled(x) -> Disgruntle(x, alana)) -> therefore Disgruntle(alana, alana) Disgruntle(alana, alana) and forall x (Disgruntle(x, alana) -> Disgruntle(x, gweneth)) -> therefore Disgruntle(alana, gweneth) Somersault(alana, gweneth) and Disgruntle(alana, gweneth) and forall x (Somersault(x, gweneth) and Disgruntle(x, gweneth) -> Somersault(x, alana)) -> therefore Somersault(alana, alana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The cristie bridle the wain. The cristie is corrective. The cristie is uncolored. The cristie lament the wain. The cristie encipher the wain. The wain bridle the cristie. The wain is corrective. The wain is unentitled. The wain is uncolored. The wain encipher the cristie. If something encipher the cristie and it lament the cristie then it encipher the wain. If something is unentitled then it lament the wain. If something encipher the cristie then it is corrective. If the wain encipher the cristie and the wain lament the cristie then the wain is agronomic. If something lament the wain then it lament the cristie. If something is uncolored then it bridle the wain. The wain does not see the wain.", "logic": "\nBridle(cristie, wain)\nCorrective(cristie)\nUncolored(cristie)\nLament(cristie, wain)\nEncipher(cristie, wain)\nBridle(wain, cristie)\nCorrective(wain)\nUnentitled(wain)\nUncolored(wain)\nEncipher(wain, cristie)\nforall x (Encipher(x, cristie) and Lament(x, cristie) -> Encipher(x, wain))\nforall x (Unentitled(x) -> Lament(x, wain))\nforall x (Encipher(x, cristie) -> Corrective(x))\nEncipher(wain, cristie) and Lament(wain, cristie) -> Agronomic(wain)\nforall x (Lament(x, wain) -> Lament(x, cristie))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Bridle(x, wain))\n\nnot Encipher(wain, wain)\n\nUnentitled(wain) and forall x (Unentitled(x) -> Lament(x, wain)) -> therefore Lament(wain, wain) Lament(wain, wain) and forall x (Lament(x, wain) -> Lament(x, cristie)) -> therefore Lament(wain, cristie) Encipher(wain, cristie) and Lament(wain, cristie) and forall x (Encipher(x, cristie) and Lament(x, cristie) -> Encipher(x, wain)) -> therefore Encipher(wain, wain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The lacie criticise the rufe. The lacie is philistine. The lacie is token. The lacie dialyse the rufe. The lacie envision the rufe. The rufe criticise the lacie. The rufe is philistine. The rufe is unripened. The rufe is token. The rufe envision the lacie. If something envision the lacie and it dialyse the lacie then it envision the rufe. If something is unripened then it dialyse the rufe. If something envision the lacie then it is philistine. If the rufe envision the lacie and the rufe dialyse the lacie then the rufe is recurved. If something dialyse the rufe then it dialyse the lacie. If something is token then it criticise the rufe. The rufe is not kind.", "logic": "\nCriticise(lacie, rufe)\nPhilistine(lacie)\nToken(lacie)\nDialyse(lacie, rufe)\nEnvision(lacie, rufe)\nCriticise(rufe, lacie)\nPhilistine(rufe)\nUnripened(rufe)\nToken(rufe)\nEnvision(rufe, lacie)\nforall x (Envision(x, lacie) and Dialyse(x, lacie) -> Envision(x, rufe))\nforall x (Unripened(x) -> Dialyse(x, rufe))\nforall x (Envision(x, lacie) -> Philistine(x))\nEnvision(rufe, lacie) and Dialyse(rufe, lacie) -> Recurved(rufe)\nforall x (Dialyse(x, rufe) -> Dialyse(x, lacie))\nforall x (Token(x) -> Criticise(x, rufe))\n\nnot Kind(rufe)\n\nnot Kind(rufe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The estele notarise the oral. The estele is empurpled. The estele is hypodermic. The estele send the oral. The estele refloat the oral. The oral notarise the estele. The oral is empurpled. The oral is blotched. The oral is hypodermic. The oral refloat the estele. If something refloat the estele and it send the estele then it refloat the oral. If something is blotched then it send the oral. If something refloat the estele then it is empurpled. If the oral refloat the estele and the oral send the estele then the oral is megascopic. If something send the oral then it send the estele. If something is hypodermic then it notarise the oral. The estele is megascopic.", "logic": "\nNotarise(estele, oral)\nEmpurpled(estele)\nHypodermic(estele)\nSend(estele, oral)\nRefloat(estele, oral)\nNotarise(oral, estele)\nEmpurpled(oral)\nBlotched(oral)\nHypodermic(oral)\nRefloat(oral, estele)\nforall x (Refloat(x, estele) and Send(x, estele) -> Refloat(x, oral))\nforall x (Blotched(x) -> Send(x, oral))\nforall x (Refloat(x, estele) -> Empurpled(x))\nRefloat(oral, estele) and Send(oral, estele) -> Megascopic(oral)\nforall x (Send(x, oral) -> Send(x, estele))\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) -> Notarise(x, oral))\n\nMegascopic(estele)\n\nMegascopic(estele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The tierney besot the brooks. The tierney is prognostic. The tierney is monarchal. The tierney apotheose the brooks. The tierney roughcast the brooks. The brooks besot the tierney. The brooks is prognostic. The brooks is legible. The brooks is monarchal. The brooks roughcast the tierney. If something roughcast the tierney and it apotheose the tierney then it roughcast the brooks. If something is legible then it apotheose the brooks. If something roughcast the tierney then it is prognostic. If the brooks roughcast the tierney and the brooks apotheose the tierney then the brooks is narrow. If something apotheose the brooks then it apotheose the tierney. If something is monarchal then it besot the brooks. The tierney does not see the tierney.", "logic": "\nBesot(tierney, brooks)\nPrognostic(tierney)\nMonarchal(tierney)\nApotheose(tierney, brooks)\nRoughcast(tierney, brooks)\nBesot(brooks, tierney)\nPrognostic(brooks)\nLegible(brooks)\nMonarchal(brooks)\nRoughcast(brooks, tierney)\nforall x (Roughcast(x, tierney) and Apotheose(x, tierney) -> Roughcast(x, brooks))\nforall x (Legible(x) -> Apotheose(x, brooks))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, tierney) -> Prognostic(x))\nRoughcast(brooks, tierney) and Apotheose(brooks, tierney) -> Narrow(brooks)\nforall x (Apotheose(x, brooks) -> Apotheose(x, tierney))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) -> Besot(x, brooks))\n\nnot Roughcast(tierney, tierney)\n\nnot Roughcast(tierney, tierney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The walton recumb the myrtice. The walton is tall. The walton is wearying. The walton lean the myrtice. The walton pinion the myrtice. The myrtice recumb the walton. The myrtice is tall. The myrtice is sweltry. The myrtice is wearying. The myrtice pinion the walton. If something pinion the walton and it lean the walton then it pinion the myrtice. If something is sweltry then it lean the myrtice. If something pinion the walton then it is tall. If the myrtice pinion the walton and the myrtice lean the walton then the myrtice is fragrant. If something lean the myrtice then it lean the walton. If something is wearying then it recumb the myrtice. The walton is sweltry.", "logic": "\nRecumb(walton, myrtice)\nTall(walton)\nWearying(walton)\nLean(walton, myrtice)\nPinion(walton, myrtice)\nRecumb(myrtice, walton)\nTall(myrtice)\nSweltry(myrtice)\nWearying(myrtice)\nPinion(myrtice, walton)\nforall x (Pinion(x, walton) and Lean(x, walton) -> Pinion(x, myrtice))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) -> Lean(x, myrtice))\nforall x (Pinion(x, walton) -> Tall(x))\nPinion(myrtice, walton) and Lean(myrtice, walton) -> Fragrant(myrtice)\nforall x (Lean(x, myrtice) -> Lean(x, walton))\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Recumb(x, myrtice))\n\nSweltry(walton)\n\nSweltry(walton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The agna digitalize the karrah. The agna is upscale. The agna is scary. The agna satellite the karrah. The agna strop the karrah. The karrah digitalize the agna. The karrah is upscale. The karrah is suboceanic. The karrah is scary. The karrah strop the agna. If something strop the agna and it satellite the agna then it strop the karrah. If something is suboceanic then it satellite the karrah. If something strop the agna then it is upscale. If the karrah strop the agna and the karrah satellite the agna then the karrah is alcoholic. If something satellite the karrah then it satellite the agna. If something is scary then it digitalize the karrah. The agna is not kind.", "logic": "\nDigitalize(agna, karrah)\nUpscale(agna)\nScary(agna)\nSatellite(agna, karrah)\nStrop(agna, karrah)\nDigitalize(karrah, agna)\nUpscale(karrah)\nSuboceanic(karrah)\nScary(karrah)\nStrop(karrah, agna)\nforall x (Strop(x, agna) and Satellite(x, agna) -> Strop(x, karrah))\nforall x (Suboceanic(x) -> Satellite(x, karrah))\nforall x (Strop(x, agna) -> Upscale(x))\nStrop(karrah, agna) and Satellite(karrah, agna) -> Alcoholic(karrah)\nforall x (Satellite(x, karrah) -> Satellite(x, agna))\nforall x (Scary(x) -> Digitalize(x, karrah))\n\nnot Kind(agna)\n\nnot Kind(agna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The witty unhitch the darius. The witty is tearaway. The witty is manifest. The witty decolorize the darius. The witty soundproof the darius. The darius unhitch the witty. The darius is tearaway. The darius is helical. The darius is manifest. The darius soundproof the witty. If something soundproof the witty and it decolorize the witty then it soundproof the darius. If something is helical then it decolorize the darius. If something soundproof the witty then it is tearaway. If the darius soundproof the witty and the darius decolorize the witty then the darius is anagogical. If something decolorize the darius then it decolorize the witty. If something is manifest then it unhitch the darius. The witty unhitch the witty.", "logic": "\nUnhitch(witty, darius)\nTearaway(witty)\nManifest(witty)\nDecolorize(witty, darius)\nSoundproof(witty, darius)\nUnhitch(darius, witty)\nTearaway(darius)\nHelical(darius)\nManifest(darius)\nSoundproof(darius, witty)\nforall x (Soundproof(x, witty) and Decolorize(x, witty) -> Soundproof(x, darius))\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Decolorize(x, darius))\nforall x (Soundproof(x, witty) -> Tearaway(x))\nSoundproof(darius, witty) and Decolorize(darius, witty) -> Anagogical(darius)\nforall x (Decolorize(x, darius) -> Decolorize(x, witty))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Unhitch(x, darius))\n\nUnhitch(witty, witty)\n\nUnhitch(witty, witty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "Kendrick is familiar. Kendrick is flemish. Honoria is bursiform. Honoria is familiar. Honoria is flemish. Honoria is algerian. Stafani is bursiform. Stafani is familiar. Stafani is soundless. Stafani is palatial. Stafani is algerian. Stafani is finite. Shellie is flemish. Shellie is soundless. Shellie is palatial. Shellie is algerian. Rough things are finite. Kind things are bursiform. Furry things are soundless. All flemish, soundless things are finite. White, flemish things are palatial. If something is finite then it is algerian. Furry things are finite. If Shellie is algerian then Shellie is familiar. Shellie is flemish.", "logic": "\nFamiliar(kendrick)\nFlemish(kendrick)\nBursiform(honoria)\nFamiliar(honoria)\nFlemish(honoria)\nAlgerian(honoria)\nBursiform(stafani)\nFamiliar(stafani)\nSoundless(stafani)\nPalatial(stafani)\nAlgerian(stafani)\nFinite(stafani)\nFlemish(shellie)\nSoundless(shellie)\nPalatial(shellie)\nAlgerian(shellie)\nforall x (Palatial(x) -> Finite(x))\nforall x (Flemish(x) -> Bursiform(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Soundless(x))\nforall x (Flemish(x) and Soundless(x) -> Finite(x))\nforall x (Algerian(x) and Flemish(x) -> Palatial(x))\nforall x (Finite(x) -> Algerian(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Finite(x))\nAlgerian(shellie) -> Familiar(shellie)\n\nFlemish(shellie)\n\ntherefore Flemish(shellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Donny is seemly. Donny is loamy. Bailey is anthropoid. Bailey is seemly. Bailey is loamy. Bailey is infamous. Roth is anthropoid. Roth is seemly. Roth is nazarene. Roth is brindle. Roth is infamous. Roth is iron. Roland is loamy. Roland is nazarene. Roland is brindle. Roland is infamous. Rough things are iron. Kind things are anthropoid. Furry things are nazarene. All loamy, nazarene things are iron. White, loamy things are brindle. If something is iron then it is infamous. Furry things are iron. If Roland is infamous then Roland is seemly. Donny is not seemly.", "logic": "\nSeemly(donny)\nLoamy(donny)\nAnthropoid(bailey)\nSeemly(bailey)\nLoamy(bailey)\nInfamous(bailey)\nAnthropoid(roth)\nSeemly(roth)\nNazarene(roth)\nBrindle(roth)\nInfamous(roth)\nIron(roth)\nLoamy(roland)\nNazarene(roland)\nBrindle(roland)\nInfamous(roland)\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Iron(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Anthropoid(x))\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> Nazarene(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) and Nazarene(x) -> Iron(x))\nforall x (Infamous(x) and Loamy(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Iron(x) -> Infamous(x))\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> Iron(x))\nInfamous(roland) -> Seemly(roland)\n\nnot Seemly(donny)\n\ntherefore Seemly(donny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Julissa is manic. Julissa is lateral. Vanya is impudent. Vanya is manic. Vanya is lateral. Vanya is outspoken. Danita is impudent. Danita is manic. Danita is dauntless. Danita is doting. Danita is outspoken. Danita is musky. Sophronia is lateral. Sophronia is dauntless. Sophronia is doting. Sophronia is outspoken. Rough things are musky. Kind things are impudent. Furry things are dauntless. All lateral, dauntless things are musky. White, lateral things are doting. If something is musky then it is outspoken. Furry things are musky. If Sophronia is outspoken then Sophronia is manic. Sophronia is manic.", "logic": "\nManic(julissa)\nLateral(julissa)\nImpudent(vanya)\nManic(vanya)\nLateral(vanya)\nOutspoken(vanya)\nImpudent(danita)\nManic(danita)\nDauntless(danita)\nDoting(danita)\nOutspoken(danita)\nMusky(danita)\nLateral(sophronia)\nDauntless(sophronia)\nDoting(sophronia)\nOutspoken(sophronia)\nforall x (Doting(x) -> Musky(x))\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Dauntless(x))\nforall x (Lateral(x) and Dauntless(x) -> Musky(x))\nforall x (Outspoken(x) and Lateral(x) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Outspoken(x))\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Musky(x))\nOutspoken(sophronia) -> Manic(sophronia)\n\nManic(sophronia)\n\nOutspoken(sophronia) and Outspoken(sophronia) -> Manic(sophronia) -> therefore Manic(sophronia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Aguste is theatrical. Aguste is beholden. Barnebas is perennial. Barnebas is theatrical. Barnebas is beholden. Barnebas is enkindled. Didi is perennial. Didi is theatrical. Didi is metabolous. Didi is amusing. Didi is enkindled. Didi is censored. Jannel is beholden. Jannel is metabolous. Jannel is amusing. Jannel is enkindled. Rough things are censored. Kind things are perennial. Furry things are metabolous. All beholden, metabolous things are censored. White, beholden things are amusing. If something is censored then it is enkindled. Furry things are censored. If Jannel is enkindled then Jannel is theatrical. Barnebas is not censored.", "logic": "\nTheatrical(aguste)\nBeholden(aguste)\nPerennial(barnebas)\nTheatrical(barnebas)\nBeholden(barnebas)\nEnkindled(barnebas)\nPerennial(didi)\nTheatrical(didi)\nMetabolous(didi)\nAmusing(didi)\nEnkindled(didi)\nCensored(didi)\nBeholden(jannel)\nMetabolous(jannel)\nAmusing(jannel)\nEnkindled(jannel)\nforall x (Amusing(x) -> Censored(x))\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) -> Metabolous(x))\nforall x (Beholden(x) and Metabolous(x) -> Censored(x))\nforall x (Enkindled(x) and Beholden(x) -> Amusing(x))\nforall x (Censored(x) -> Enkindled(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) -> Censored(x))\nEnkindled(jannel) -> Theatrical(jannel)\n\nnot Censored(barnebas)\n\nTheatrical(barnebas) and forall x (Theatrical(x) -> Censored(x)) -> therefore Censored(barnebas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Alyda is elliptical. Alyda is ametabolic. Robinette is acentric. Robinette is elliptical. Robinette is ametabolic. Robinette is cantonal. Teddy is acentric. Teddy is elliptical. Teddy is enzootic. Teddy is offhand. Teddy is cantonal. Teddy is diametric. Mahmoud is ametabolic. Mahmoud is enzootic. Mahmoud is offhand. Mahmoud is cantonal. Rough things are diametric. Kind things are acentric. Furry things are enzootic. All ametabolic, enzootic things are diametric. White, ametabolic things are offhand. If something is diametric then it is cantonal. Furry things are diametric. If Mahmoud is cantonal then Mahmoud is elliptical. Alyda is cantonal.", "logic": "\nElliptical(alyda)\nAmetabolic(alyda)\nAcentric(robinette)\nElliptical(robinette)\nAmetabolic(robinette)\nCantonal(robinette)\nAcentric(teddy)\nElliptical(teddy)\nEnzootic(teddy)\nOffhand(teddy)\nCantonal(teddy)\nDiametric(teddy)\nAmetabolic(mahmoud)\nEnzootic(mahmoud)\nOffhand(mahmoud)\nCantonal(mahmoud)\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Diametric(x))\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) -> Acentric(x))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) -> Enzootic(x))\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) and Enzootic(x) -> Diametric(x))\nforall x (Cantonal(x) and Ametabolic(x) -> Offhand(x))\nforall x (Diametric(x) -> Cantonal(x))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) -> Diametric(x))\nCantonal(mahmoud) -> Elliptical(mahmoud)\n\nCantonal(alyda)\n\nElliptical(alyda) and forall x (Elliptical(x) -> Diametric(x)) -> therefore Diametric(alyda) Diametric(alyda) and forall x (Diametric(x) -> Cantonal(x)) -> therefore Cantonal(alyda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Honey is anuretic. Honey is eristic. Emmaline is beta. Emmaline is anuretic. Emmaline is eristic. Emmaline is zionist. Doll is beta. Doll is anuretic. Doll is unfixed. Doll is chondritic. Doll is zionist. Doll is gullible. Jamima is eristic. Jamima is unfixed. Jamima is chondritic. Jamima is zionist. Rough things are gullible. Kind things are beta. Furry things are unfixed. All eristic, unfixed things are gullible. White, eristic things are chondritic. If something is gullible then it is zionist. Furry things are gullible. If Jamima is zionist then Jamima is anuretic. Honey is not zionist.", "logic": "\nAnuretic(honey)\nEristic(honey)\nBeta(emmaline)\nAnuretic(emmaline)\nEristic(emmaline)\nZionist(emmaline)\nBeta(doll)\nAnuretic(doll)\nUnfixed(doll)\nChondritic(doll)\nZionist(doll)\nGullible(doll)\nEristic(jamima)\nUnfixed(jamima)\nChondritic(jamima)\nZionist(jamima)\nforall x (Chondritic(x) -> Gullible(x))\nforall x (Eristic(x) -> Beta(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Eristic(x) and Unfixed(x) -> Gullible(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) and Eristic(x) -> Chondritic(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) -> Gullible(x))\nZionist(jamima) -> Anuretic(jamima)\n\nnot Zionist(honey)\n\nAnuretic(honey) and forall x (Anuretic(x) -> Gullible(x)) -> therefore Gullible(honey) Gullible(honey) and forall x (Gullible(x) -> Zionist(x)) -> therefore Zionist(honey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Lizzie is randy. Lizzie is primal. Maren is unhygienic. Maren is randy. Maren is primal. Maren is metalloid. Stephani is unhygienic. Stephani is randy. Stephani is nectarous. Stephani is silty. Stephani is metalloid. Stephani is oleaginous. Fallon is primal. Fallon is nectarous. Fallon is silty. Fallon is metalloid. Rough things are oleaginous. Kind things are unhygienic. Furry things are nectarous. All primal, nectarous things are oleaginous. White, primal things are silty. If something is oleaginous then it is metalloid. Furry things are oleaginous. If Fallon is metalloid then Fallon is randy. Lizzie is silty.", "logic": "\nRandy(lizzie)\nPrimal(lizzie)\nUnhygienic(maren)\nRandy(maren)\nPrimal(maren)\nMetalloid(maren)\nUnhygienic(stephani)\nRandy(stephani)\nNectarous(stephani)\nSilty(stephani)\nMetalloid(stephani)\nOleaginous(stephani)\nPrimal(fallon)\nNectarous(fallon)\nSilty(fallon)\nMetalloid(fallon)\nforall x (Silty(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Primal(x) -> Unhygienic(x))\nforall x (Randy(x) -> Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Primal(x) and Nectarous(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Primal(x) -> Silty(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Metalloid(x))\nforall x (Randy(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nMetalloid(fallon) -> Randy(fallon)\n\nSilty(lizzie)\n\nRandy(lizzie) and forall x (Randy(x) -> Oleaginous(x)) -> therefore Oleaginous(lizzie) Oleaginous(lizzie) and forall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Metalloid(x)) -> therefore Metalloid(lizzie) Metalloid(lizzie) and Primal(lizzie) and forall x (Metalloid(x) and Primal(x) -> Silty(x)) -> therefore Silty(lizzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Peter is polygenic. Peter is unitary. Andrew is oppressive. Andrew is polygenic. Andrew is unitary. Andrew is inured. Antonella is oppressive. Antonella is polygenic. Antonella is ductile. Antonella is exoergic. Antonella is inured. Antonella is unfading. Daisey is unitary. Daisey is ductile. Daisey is exoergic. Daisey is inured. Rough things are unfading. Kind things are oppressive. Furry things are ductile. All unitary, ductile things are unfading. White, unitary things are exoergic. If something is unfading then it is inured. Furry things are unfading. If Daisey is inured then Daisey is polygenic. Peter is not exoergic.", "logic": "\nPolygenic(peter)\nUnitary(peter)\nOppressive(andrew)\nPolygenic(andrew)\nUnitary(andrew)\nInured(andrew)\nOppressive(antonella)\nPolygenic(antonella)\nDuctile(antonella)\nExoergic(antonella)\nInured(antonella)\nUnfading(antonella)\nUnitary(daisey)\nDuctile(daisey)\nExoergic(daisey)\nInured(daisey)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Unfading(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Oppressive(x))\nforall x (Polygenic(x) -> Ductile(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) and Ductile(x) -> Unfading(x))\nforall x (Inured(x) and Unitary(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Unfading(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Polygenic(x) -> Unfading(x))\nInured(daisey) -> Polygenic(daisey)\n\nnot Exoergic(peter)\n\nPolygenic(peter) and forall x (Polygenic(x) -> Unfading(x)) -> therefore Unfading(peter) Unfading(peter) and forall x (Unfading(x) -> Inured(x)) -> therefore Inured(peter) Inured(peter) and Unitary(peter) and forall x (Inured(x) and Unitary(x) -> Exoergic(x)) -> therefore Exoergic(peter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Konstanze is fourpenny. Konstanze is terse. Konstanze is variolar. Konstanze is acrophobic. Konstanze is centrical. Konstanze is niggling. Keriann is terse. Keriann is variolar. Keriann is acrophobic. Keriann is tremendous. Keriann is centrical. Keriann is niggling. Davina is fourpenny. Davina is variolar. Davina is acrophobic. Round, niggling people are variolar. If someone is acrophobic then they are niggling. All variolar, niggling people are centrical. If someone is acrophobic and tremendous then they are fourpenny. Young people are fourpenny. If someone is acrophobic and centrical then they are terse. Keriann is centrical.", "logic": "\nFourpenny(konstanze)\nTerse(konstanze)\nVariolar(konstanze)\nAcrophobic(konstanze)\nCentrical(konstanze)\nNiggling(konstanze)\nTerse(keriann)\nVariolar(keriann)\nAcrophobic(keriann)\nTremendous(keriann)\nCentrical(keriann)\nNiggling(keriann)\nFourpenny(davina)\nVariolar(davina)\nAcrophobic(davina)\nforall x (Tremendous(x) and Niggling(x) -> Variolar(x))\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) -> Niggling(x))\nforall x (Variolar(x) and Niggling(x) -> Centrical(x))\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) and Tremendous(x) -> Fourpenny(x))\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Fourpenny(x))\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) and Centrical(x) -> Terse(x))\n\nCentrical(keriann)\n\ntherefore Centrical(keriann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Sigmund is perilous. Sigmund is colonized. Sigmund is sinhala. Sigmund is adjuvant. Sigmund is centric. Sigmund is hominal. Hiram is colonized. Hiram is sinhala. Hiram is adjuvant. Hiram is deathlike. Hiram is centric. Hiram is hominal. Giacomo is perilous. Giacomo is sinhala. Giacomo is adjuvant. Round, hominal people are sinhala. If someone is adjuvant then they are hominal. All sinhala, hominal people are centric. If someone is adjuvant and deathlike then they are perilous. Young people are perilous. If someone is adjuvant and centric then they are colonized. Sigmund is not perilous.", "logic": "\nPerilous(sigmund)\nColonized(sigmund)\nSinhala(sigmund)\nAdjuvant(sigmund)\nCentric(sigmund)\nHominal(sigmund)\nColonized(hiram)\nSinhala(hiram)\nAdjuvant(hiram)\nDeathlike(hiram)\nCentric(hiram)\nHominal(hiram)\nPerilous(giacomo)\nSinhala(giacomo)\nAdjuvant(giacomo)\nforall x (Deathlike(x) and Hominal(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nforall x (Adjuvant(x) -> Hominal(x))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) and Hominal(x) -> Centric(x))\nforall x (Adjuvant(x) and Deathlike(x) -> Perilous(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) -> Perilous(x))\nforall x (Adjuvant(x) and Centric(x) -> Colonized(x))\n\nnot Perilous(sigmund)\n\ntherefore Perilous(sigmund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Vassili is tenfold. Vassili is tacit. Vassili is cataclinal. Vassili is teentsy. Vassili is jaggy. Vassili is braw. Isabelita is tacit. Isabelita is cataclinal. Isabelita is teentsy. Isabelita is mossy. Isabelita is jaggy. Isabelita is braw. Lyssa is tenfold. Lyssa is cataclinal. Lyssa is teentsy. Round, braw people are cataclinal. If someone is teentsy then they are braw. All cataclinal, braw people are jaggy. If someone is teentsy and mossy then they are tenfold. Young people are tenfold. If someone is teentsy and jaggy then they are tacit. Isabelita is tenfold.", "logic": "\nTenfold(vassili)\nTacit(vassili)\nCataclinal(vassili)\nTeentsy(vassili)\nJaggy(vassili)\nBraw(vassili)\nTacit(isabelita)\nCataclinal(isabelita)\nTeentsy(isabelita)\nMossy(isabelita)\nJaggy(isabelita)\nBraw(isabelita)\nTenfold(lyssa)\nCataclinal(lyssa)\nTeentsy(lyssa)\nforall x (Mossy(x) and Braw(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Teentsy(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) and Braw(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nforall x (Teentsy(x) and Mossy(x) -> Tenfold(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) -> Tenfold(x))\nforall x (Teentsy(x) and Jaggy(x) -> Tacit(x))\n\nTenfold(isabelita)\n\nBraw(isabelita) and forall x (Braw(x) -> Tenfold(x)) -> therefore Tenfold(isabelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Scarlett is pustulate. Scarlett is geometric. Scarlett is congenital. Scarlett is rude. Scarlett is nether. Scarlett is umpteen. Analiese is geometric. Analiese is congenital. Analiese is rude. Analiese is upstage. Analiese is nether. Analiese is umpteen. Chet is pustulate. Chet is congenital. Chet is rude. Round, umpteen people are congenital. If someone is rude then they are umpteen. All congenital, umpteen people are nether. If someone is rude and upstage then they are pustulate. Young people are pustulate. If someone is rude and nether then they are geometric. Analiese is not pustulate.", "logic": "\nPustulate(scarlett)\nGeometric(scarlett)\nCongenital(scarlett)\nRude(scarlett)\nNether(scarlett)\nUmpteen(scarlett)\nGeometric(analiese)\nCongenital(analiese)\nRude(analiese)\nUpstage(analiese)\nNether(analiese)\nUmpteen(analiese)\nPustulate(chet)\nCongenital(chet)\nRude(chet)\nforall x (Upstage(x) and Umpteen(x) -> Congenital(x))\nforall x (Rude(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Congenital(x) and Umpteen(x) -> Nether(x))\nforall x (Rude(x) and Upstage(x) -> Pustulate(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Pustulate(x))\nforall x (Rude(x) and Nether(x) -> Geometric(x))\n\nnot Pustulate(analiese)\n\nUmpteen(analiese) and forall x (Umpteen(x) -> Pustulate(x)) -> therefore Pustulate(analiese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Goldarina is loquacious. Goldarina is biweekly. Goldarina is birchen. Goldarina is eastbound. Goldarina is lxiii. Goldarina is cosy. Maudie is biweekly. Maudie is birchen. Maudie is eastbound. Maudie is doubled. Maudie is lxiii. Maudie is cosy. Deloris is loquacious. Deloris is birchen. Deloris is eastbound. Round, cosy people are birchen. If someone is eastbound then they are cosy. All birchen, cosy people are lxiii. If someone is eastbound and doubled then they are loquacious. Young people are loquacious. If someone is eastbound and lxiii then they are biweekly. Deloris is lxiii.", "logic": "\nLoquacious(goldarina)\nBiweekly(goldarina)\nBirchen(goldarina)\nEastbound(goldarina)\nLxiii(goldarina)\nCosy(goldarina)\nBiweekly(maudie)\nBirchen(maudie)\nEastbound(maudie)\nDoubled(maudie)\nLxiii(maudie)\nCosy(maudie)\nLoquacious(deloris)\nBirchen(deloris)\nEastbound(deloris)\nforall x (Doubled(x) and Cosy(x) -> Birchen(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Cosy(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) and Cosy(x) -> Lxiii(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) and Doubled(x) -> Loquacious(x))\nforall x (Cosy(x) -> Loquacious(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) and Lxiii(x) -> Biweekly(x))\n\nLxiii(deloris)\n\nEastbound(deloris) and forall x (Eastbound(x) -> Cosy(x)) -> therefore Cosy(deloris) Birchen(deloris) and Cosy(deloris) and forall x (Birchen(x) and Cosy(x) -> Lxiii(x)) -> therefore Lxiii(deloris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Abdullah is unsavory. Abdullah is larghetto. Abdullah is focal. Abdullah is nominated. Abdullah is wounding. Abdullah is farming. Windham is larghetto. Windham is focal. Windham is nominated. Windham is synchronal. Windham is wounding. Windham is farming. Hunter is unsavory. Hunter is focal. Hunter is nominated. Round, farming people are focal. If someone is nominated then they are farming. All focal, farming people are wounding. If someone is nominated and synchronal then they are unsavory. Young people are unsavory. If someone is nominated and wounding then they are larghetto. Hunter is not wounding.", "logic": "\nUnsavory(abdullah)\nLarghetto(abdullah)\nFocal(abdullah)\nNominated(abdullah)\nWounding(abdullah)\nFarming(abdullah)\nLarghetto(windham)\nFocal(windham)\nNominated(windham)\nSynchronal(windham)\nWounding(windham)\nFarming(windham)\nUnsavory(hunter)\nFocal(hunter)\nNominated(hunter)\nforall x (Synchronal(x) and Farming(x) -> Focal(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> Farming(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) and Farming(x) -> Wounding(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and Synchronal(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Farming(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and Wounding(x) -> Larghetto(x))\n\nnot Wounding(hunter)\n\nNominated(hunter) and forall x (Nominated(x) -> Farming(x)) -> therefore Farming(hunter) Focal(hunter) and Farming(hunter) and forall x (Focal(x) and Farming(x) -> Wounding(x)) -> therefore Wounding(hunter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Anton is undigested. Anton is wholesale. Anton is attrited. Anton is rushed. Anton is derogative. Anton is sheetlike. Socrates is wholesale. Socrates is attrited. Socrates is rushed. Socrates is uncultured. Socrates is derogative. Socrates is sheetlike. Mendie is undigested. Mendie is attrited. Mendie is rushed. Round, sheetlike people are attrited. If someone is rushed then they are sheetlike. All attrited, sheetlike people are derogative. If someone is rushed and uncultured then they are undigested. Young people are undigested. If someone is rushed and derogative then they are wholesale. Mendie is wholesale.", "logic": "\nUndigested(anton)\nWholesale(anton)\nAttrited(anton)\nRushed(anton)\nDerogative(anton)\nSheetlike(anton)\nWholesale(socrates)\nAttrited(socrates)\nRushed(socrates)\nUncultured(socrates)\nDerogative(socrates)\nSheetlike(socrates)\nUndigested(mendie)\nAttrited(mendie)\nRushed(mendie)\nforall x (Uncultured(x) and Sheetlike(x) -> Attrited(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) -> Sheetlike(x))\nforall x (Attrited(x) and Sheetlike(x) -> Derogative(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Sheetlike(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) and Derogative(x) -> Wholesale(x))\n\nWholesale(mendie)\n\nRushed(mendie) and forall x (Rushed(x) -> Sheetlike(x)) -> therefore Sheetlike(mendie) Attrited(mendie) and Sheetlike(mendie) and forall x (Attrited(x) and Sheetlike(x) -> Derogative(x)) -> therefore Derogative(mendie) Rushed(mendie) and Derogative(mendie) and forall x (Rushed(x) and Derogative(x) -> Wholesale(x)) -> therefore Wholesale(mendie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Shepherd is deboned. Shepherd is wedded. Shepherd is coital. Shepherd is enlarged. Shepherd is damnatory. Shepherd is hollywood. Vasilis is wedded. Vasilis is coital. Vasilis is enlarged. Vasilis is greyed. Vasilis is damnatory. Vasilis is hollywood. Godard is deboned. Godard is coital. Godard is enlarged. Round, hollywood people are coital. If someone is enlarged then they are hollywood. All coital, hollywood people are damnatory. If someone is enlarged and greyed then they are deboned. Young people are deboned. If someone is enlarged and damnatory then they are wedded. Godard is not wedded.", "logic": "\nDeboned(shepherd)\nWedded(shepherd)\nCoital(shepherd)\nEnlarged(shepherd)\nDamnatory(shepherd)\nHollywood(shepherd)\nWedded(vasilis)\nCoital(vasilis)\nEnlarged(vasilis)\nGreyed(vasilis)\nDamnatory(vasilis)\nHollywood(vasilis)\nDeboned(godard)\nCoital(godard)\nEnlarged(godard)\nforall x (Greyed(x) and Hollywood(x) -> Coital(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Hollywood(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) and Hollywood(x) -> Damnatory(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and Greyed(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and Damnatory(x) -> Wedded(x))\n\nnot Wedded(godard)\n\nEnlarged(godard) and forall x (Enlarged(x) -> Hollywood(x)) -> therefore Hollywood(godard) Coital(godard) and Hollywood(godard) and forall x (Coital(x) and Hollywood(x) -> Damnatory(x)) -> therefore Damnatory(godard) Enlarged(godard) and Damnatory(godard) and forall x (Enlarged(x) and Damnatory(x) -> Wedded(x)) -> therefore Wedded(godard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Sarine is assistive. Sarine is unmeasured. Sarine is ascetical. Sarine is lifelike. Sarine is written. Sarine is pudgy. Charley is unmeasured. Charley is ascetical. Charley is lifelike. Charley is sunrise. Charley is written. Charley is pudgy. Alecia is assistive. Alecia is ascetical. Alecia is lifelike. Round, pudgy people are ascetical. If someone is lifelike then they are pudgy. All ascetical, pudgy people are written. If someone is lifelike and sunrise then they are assistive. Young people are assistive. If someone is lifelike and written then they are unmeasured. Alecia is not sunrise.", "logic": "\nAssistive(sarine)\nUnmeasured(sarine)\nAscetical(sarine)\nLifelike(sarine)\nWritten(sarine)\nPudgy(sarine)\nUnmeasured(charley)\nAscetical(charley)\nLifelike(charley)\nSunrise(charley)\nWritten(charley)\nPudgy(charley)\nAssistive(alecia)\nAscetical(alecia)\nLifelike(alecia)\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Pudgy(x) -> Ascetical(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> Pudgy(x))\nforall x (Ascetical(x) and Pudgy(x) -> Written(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Sunrise(x) -> Assistive(x))\nforall x (Pudgy(x) -> Assistive(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Written(x) -> Unmeasured(x))\n\nnot Sunrise(alecia)\n\nnot Sunrise(alecia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Elke is indiscrete. Elke is viral. Elke is softheaded. Elke is thundery. Elke is sinkable. Elke is vacant. Celesta is viral. Celesta is softheaded. Celesta is thundery. Celesta is farsighted. Celesta is sinkable. Celesta is vacant. Melisenda is indiscrete. Melisenda is softheaded. Melisenda is thundery. Round, vacant people are softheaded. If someone is thundery then they are vacant. All softheaded, vacant people are sinkable. If someone is thundery and farsighted then they are indiscrete. Young people are indiscrete. If someone is thundery and sinkable then they are viral. Elke is farsighted.", "logic": "\nIndiscrete(elke)\nViral(elke)\nSoftheaded(elke)\nThundery(elke)\nSinkable(elke)\nVacant(elke)\nViral(celesta)\nSoftheaded(celesta)\nThundery(celesta)\nFarsighted(celesta)\nSinkable(celesta)\nVacant(celesta)\nIndiscrete(melisenda)\nSoftheaded(melisenda)\nThundery(melisenda)\nforall x (Farsighted(x) and Vacant(x) -> Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) -> Vacant(x))\nforall x (Softheaded(x) and Vacant(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Farsighted(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Vacant(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Sinkable(x) -> Viral(x))\n\nFarsighted(elke)\n\nFarsighted(elke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Ernst is clubable. Pearla is caucasian. Dasi is unchanging. Velma is clubable. Big, fortemente people are azotemic. If someone is azotemic then they are unchanging. If someone is caucasian and azotemic then they are warning. If someone is clubable then they are fortemente. Round people are azotemic. Round, warning people are caucasian. Velma is clubable.", "logic": "\nClubable(ernst)\nCaucasian(pearla)\nUnchanging(dasi)\nClubable(velma)\nforall x (Warning(x) and Fortemente(x) -> Azotemic(x))\nforall x (Azotemic(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Caucasian(x) and Azotemic(x) -> Warning(x))\nforall x (Clubable(x) -> Fortemente(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) -> Azotemic(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Warning(x) -> Caucasian(x))\n\nClubable(velma)\n\ntherefore Clubable(velma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Gabriele is rouged. Bartlett is accentual. Brandise is stocked. Sharna is rouged. Big, spread people are uncooked. If someone is uncooked then they are stocked. If someone is accentual and uncooked then they are derisory. If someone is rouged then they are spread. Round people are uncooked. Round, derisory people are accentual. Bartlett is not accentual.", "logic": "\nRouged(gabriele)\nAccentual(bartlett)\nStocked(brandise)\nRouged(sharna)\nforall x (Derisory(x) and Spread(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Uncooked(x) -> Stocked(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) and Uncooked(x) -> Derisory(x))\nforall x (Rouged(x) -> Spread(x))\nforall x (Spread(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Spread(x) and Derisory(x) -> Accentual(x))\n\nnot Accentual(bartlett)\n\ntherefore Accentual(bartlett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Patrice is uvular. Mathew is aeschylean. Rudolph is tribal. Vida is uvular. Big, unexpended people are incurved. If someone is incurved then they are tribal. If someone is aeschylean and incurved then they are boxed. If someone is uvular then they are unexpended. Round people are incurved. Round, boxed people are aeschylean. Patrice is unexpended.", "logic": "\nUvular(patrice)\nAeschylean(mathew)\nTribal(rudolph)\nUvular(vida)\nforall x (Boxed(x) and Unexpended(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Tribal(x))\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) and Incurved(x) -> Boxed(x))\nforall x (Uvular(x) -> Unexpended(x))\nforall x (Unexpended(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Unexpended(x) and Boxed(x) -> Aeschylean(x))\n\nUnexpended(patrice)\n\nUvular(patrice) and forall x (Uvular(x) -> Unexpended(x)) -> therefore Unexpended(patrice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Codee is blunted. Arvy is excellent. Howard is austral. Bealle is blunted. Big, stearic people are genuine. If someone is genuine then they are austral. If someone is excellent and genuine then they are tabular. If someone is blunted then they are stearic. Round people are genuine. Round, tabular people are excellent. Codee is not stearic.", "logic": "\nBlunted(codee)\nExcellent(arvy)\nAustral(howard)\nBlunted(bealle)\nforall x (Tabular(x) and Stearic(x) -> Genuine(x))\nforall x (Genuine(x) -> Austral(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) and Genuine(x) -> Tabular(x))\nforall x (Blunted(x) -> Stearic(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) -> Genuine(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) and Tabular(x) -> Excellent(x))\n\nnot Stearic(codee)\n\nBlunted(codee) and forall x (Blunted(x) -> Stearic(x)) -> therefore Stearic(codee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Esmeralda is resiny. Shannen is xliii. Zonnya is glued. Debera is resiny. Big, first people are humid. If someone is humid then they are glued. If someone is xliii and humid then they are subjugable. If someone is resiny then they are first. Round people are humid. Round, subjugable people are xliii. Debera is humid.", "logic": "\nResiny(esmeralda)\nXliii(shannen)\nGlued(zonnya)\nResiny(debera)\nforall x (Subjugable(x) and First(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Humid(x) -> Glued(x))\nforall x (Xliii(x) and Humid(x) -> Subjugable(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> First(x))\nforall x (First(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (First(x) and Subjugable(x) -> Xliii(x))\n\nHumid(debera)\n\nResiny(debera) and forall x (Resiny(x) -> First(x)) -> therefore First(debera) First(debera) and forall x (First(x) -> Humid(x)) -> therefore Humid(debera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Crawford is improper. Ilysa is heedless. Gabriele is ammoniated. Skippy is improper. Big, servile people are deathless. If someone is deathless then they are ammoniated. If someone is heedless and deathless then they are grey. If someone is improper then they are servile. Round people are deathless. Round, grey people are heedless. Skippy is not deathless.", "logic": "\nImproper(crawford)\nHeedless(ilysa)\nAmmoniated(gabriele)\nImproper(skippy)\nforall x (Grey(x) and Servile(x) -> Deathless(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Ammoniated(x))\nforall x (Heedless(x) and Deathless(x) -> Grey(x))\nforall x (Improper(x) -> Servile(x))\nforall x (Servile(x) -> Deathless(x))\nforall x (Servile(x) and Grey(x) -> Heedless(x))\n\nnot Deathless(skippy)\n\nImproper(skippy) and forall x (Improper(x) -> Servile(x)) -> therefore Servile(skippy) Servile(skippy) and forall x (Servile(x) -> Deathless(x)) -> therefore Deathless(skippy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Suzie is teutonic. Annetta is ended. Sharra is couthie. Sascha is teutonic. Big, goateed people are thrilled. If someone is thrilled then they are couthie. If someone is ended and thrilled then they are anestrous. If someone is teutonic then they are goateed. Round people are thrilled. Round, anestrous people are ended. Suzie is couthie.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(suzie)\nEnded(annetta)\nCouthie(sharra)\nTeutonic(sascha)\nforall x (Anestrous(x) and Goateed(x) -> Thrilled(x))\nforall x (Thrilled(x) -> Couthie(x))\nforall x (Ended(x) and Thrilled(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nforall x (Teutonic(x) -> Goateed(x))\nforall x (Goateed(x) -> Thrilled(x))\nforall x (Goateed(x) and Anestrous(x) -> Ended(x))\n\nCouthie(suzie)\n\nTeutonic(suzie) and forall x (Teutonic(x) -> Goateed(x)) -> therefore Goateed(suzie) Goateed(suzie) and forall x (Goateed(x) -> Thrilled(x)) -> therefore Thrilled(suzie) Thrilled(suzie) and forall x (Thrilled(x) -> Couthie(x)) -> therefore Couthie(suzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Garfinkel is cliched. Jeramie is ungrudging. Conrad is receding. Verne is cliched. Big, curvaceous people are fruitless. If someone is fruitless then they are receding. If someone is ungrudging and fruitless then they are baked. If someone is cliched then they are curvaceous. Round people are fruitless. Round, baked people are ungrudging. Verne is not receding.", "logic": "\nCliched(garfinkel)\nUngrudging(jeramie)\nReceding(conrad)\nCliched(verne)\nforall x (Baked(x) and Curvaceous(x) -> Fruitless(x))\nforall x (Fruitless(x) -> Receding(x))\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) and Fruitless(x) -> Baked(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) -> Fruitless(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) and Baked(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\n\nnot Receding(verne)\n\nCliched(verne) and forall x (Cliched(x) -> Curvaceous(x)) -> therefore Curvaceous(verne) Curvaceous(verne) and forall x (Curvaceous(x) -> Fruitless(x)) -> therefore Fruitless(verne) Fruitless(verne) and forall x (Fruitless(x) -> Receding(x)) -> therefore Receding(verne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Farra is legible. Darrick is staged. Casandra is lamented. Layne is legible. Big, unloving people are ridiculous. If someone is ridiculous then they are lamented. If someone is staged and ridiculous then they are knackered. If someone is legible then they are unloving. Round people are ridiculous. Round, knackered people are staged. Darrick is not unloving.", "logic": "\nLegible(farra)\nStaged(darrick)\nLamented(casandra)\nLegible(layne)\nforall x (Knackered(x) and Unloving(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Lamented(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) and Ridiculous(x) -> Knackered(x))\nforall x (Legible(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) and Knackered(x) -> Staged(x))\n\nnot Unloving(darrick)\n\nforall x (Legible(x) -> Unloving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Tracie is enervated. Gwenneth is estonian. Corliss is going. Barnebas is enervated. Big, unbaptised people are yearly. If someone is yearly then they are going. If someone is estonian and yearly then they are palsied. If someone is enervated then they are unbaptised. Round people are yearly. Round, palsied people are estonian. Barnebas is palsied.", "logic": "\nEnervated(tracie)\nEstonian(gwenneth)\nGoing(corliss)\nEnervated(barnebas)\nforall x (Palsied(x) and Unbaptised(x) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Going(x))\nforall x (Estonian(x) and Yearly(x) -> Palsied(x))\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Unbaptised(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and Palsied(x) -> Estonian(x))\n\nPalsied(barnebas)\n\nforall x (Estonian(x) and Yearly(x) -> Palsied(x)) <- forall x (Unbaptised(x) and Palsied(x) -> Estonian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Caroljean is compounded. Ilsa is priestly. Martina is dying. Nance is compounded. Big, achy people are converse. If someone is converse then they are dying. If someone is priestly and converse then they are empurpled. If someone is compounded then they are achy. Round people are converse. Round, empurpled people are priestly. Martina is not converse.", "logic": "\nCompounded(caroljean)\nPriestly(ilsa)\nDying(martina)\nCompounded(nance)\nforall x (Empurpled(x) and Achy(x) -> Converse(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) -> Dying(x))\nforall x (Priestly(x) and Converse(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> Achy(x))\nforall x (Achy(x) -> Converse(x))\nforall x (Achy(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Priestly(x))\n\nnot Converse(martina)\n\nforall x (Empurpled(x) and Achy(x) -> Converse(x)) <- forall x (Compounded(x) -> Achy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Bertrand is sixteen. Josselyn is fabled. Maison is impeccable. Kai is sixteen. Big, persuasive people are textile. If someone is textile then they are impeccable. If someone is fabled and textile then they are acarpous. If someone is sixteen then they are persuasive. Round people are textile. Round, acarpous people are fabled. Maison is acarpous.", "logic": "\nSixteen(bertrand)\nFabled(josselyn)\nImpeccable(maison)\nSixteen(kai)\nforall x (Acarpous(x) and Persuasive(x) -> Textile(x))\nforall x (Textile(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) and Textile(x) -> Acarpous(x))\nforall x (Sixteen(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) -> Textile(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) and Acarpous(x) -> Fabled(x))\n\nAcarpous(maison)\n\nforall x (Fabled(x) and Textile(x) -> Acarpous(x)) <- forall x (Persuasive(x) and Acarpous(x) -> Fabled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Sibylle is luxuriant. Wojciech is asserting. Bary is relaxed. Reggy is luxuriant. Big, botanic people are scalene. If someone is scalene then they are relaxed. If someone is asserting and scalene then they are required. If someone is luxuriant then they are botanic. Round people are scalene. Round, required people are asserting. Wojciech is not luxuriant.", "logic": "\nLuxuriant(sibylle)\nAsserting(wojciech)\nRelaxed(bary)\nLuxuriant(reggy)\nforall x (Required(x) and Botanic(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Relaxed(x))\nforall x (Asserting(x) and Scalene(x) -> Required(x))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Botanic(x))\nforall x (Botanic(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Botanic(x) and Required(x) -> Asserting(x))\n\nnot Luxuriant(wojciech)\n\nnot Luxuriant(wojciech) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Joann is romance. Bekki is vatical. Will is glycogenic. Ilise is romance. Big, downmarket people are unembodied. If someone is unembodied then they are glycogenic. If someone is vatical and unembodied then they are urethral. If someone is romance then they are downmarket. Round people are unembodied. Round, urethral people are vatical. Joann is cold.", "logic": "\nRomance(joann)\nVatical(bekki)\nGlycogenic(will)\nRomance(ilise)\nforall x (Urethral(x) and Downmarket(x) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Unembodied(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Vatical(x) and Unembodied(x) -> Urethral(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) -> Downmarket(x))\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Downmarket(x) and Urethral(x) -> Vatical(x))\n\nCold(joann)\n\nCold(joann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Osmond is tantric. Denyse is pathetic. Kee is comal. Glyn is tantric. Big, stateless people are spacey. If someone is spacey then they are comal. If someone is pathetic and spacey then they are preemptive. If someone is tantric then they are stateless. Round people are spacey. Round, preemptive people are pathetic. Denyse is not cold.", "logic": "\nTantric(osmond)\nPathetic(denyse)\nComal(kee)\nTantric(glyn)\nforall x (Preemptive(x) and Stateless(x) -> Spacey(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) -> Comal(x))\nforall x (Pathetic(x) and Spacey(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Tantric(x) -> Stateless(x))\nforall x (Stateless(x) -> Spacey(x))\nforall x (Stateless(x) and Preemptive(x) -> Pathetic(x))\n\nnot Cold(denyse)\n\nnot Cold(denyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Bronson is masterless. Tomlin is snuffly. Magdalen is scandent. Sig is masterless. Big, nestorian people are passing. If someone is passing then they are scandent. If someone is snuffly and passing then they are propulsive. If someone is masterless then they are nestorian. Round people are passing. Round, propulsive people are snuffly. Sig is cold.", "logic": "\nMasterless(bronson)\nSnuffly(tomlin)\nScandent(magdalen)\nMasterless(sig)\nforall x (Propulsive(x) and Nestorian(x) -> Passing(x))\nforall x (Passing(x) -> Scandent(x))\nforall x (Snuffly(x) and Passing(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) -> Nestorian(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Passing(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) and Propulsive(x) -> Snuffly(x))\n\nCold(sig)\n\nCold(sig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "The daisie is ensuant. All sagging things are mounted. All mounted things are suspicious. All ensuant things are mounted. Rough things are aural. All aural, ensuant things are mounted. Round, aural things are suspicious. The daisie is ensuant.", "logic": "\nEnsuant(daisie)\nforall x (Sagging(x) -> Mounted(x))\nforall x (Mounted(x) -> Suspicious(x))\nforall x (Ensuant(x) -> Mounted(x))\nforall x (Suspicious(x) -> Aural(x))\nforall x (Aural(x) and Ensuant(x) -> Mounted(x))\nforall x (Ensuant(x) and Aural(x) -> Suspicious(x))\n\nEnsuant(daisie)\n\ntherefore Ensuant(daisie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The zia is bonzer. All derelict things are unrifled. All unrifled things are homicidal. All bonzer things are unrifled. Rough things are reposeful. All reposeful, bonzer things are unrifled. Round, reposeful things are homicidal. The zia is not bonzer.", "logic": "\nBonzer(zia)\nforall x (Derelict(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Homicidal(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) and Bonzer(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Homicidal(x))\n\nnot Bonzer(zia)\n\ntherefore Bonzer(zia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The pryce is diamantine. All evasive things are apelike. All apelike things are ionic. All diamantine things are apelike. Rough things are heated. All heated, diamantine things are apelike. Round, heated things are ionic. The pryce is apelike.", "logic": "\nDiamantine(pryce)\nforall x (Evasive(x) -> Apelike(x))\nforall x (Apelike(x) -> Ionic(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) -> Apelike(x))\nforall x (Ionic(x) -> Heated(x))\nforall x (Heated(x) and Diamantine(x) -> Apelike(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) and Heated(x) -> Ionic(x))\n\nApelike(pryce)\n\nDiamantine(pryce) and forall x (Diamantine(x) -> Apelike(x)) -> therefore Apelike(pryce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The malkah is arthritic. All vaporous things are stormy. All stormy things are abatic. All arthritic things are stormy. Rough things are gristly. All gristly, arthritic things are stormy. Round, gristly things are abatic. The malkah is not stormy.", "logic": "\nArthritic(malkah)\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Stormy(x))\nforall x (Stormy(x) -> Abatic(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) -> Stormy(x))\nforall x (Abatic(x) -> Gristly(x))\nforall x (Gristly(x) and Arthritic(x) -> Stormy(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and Gristly(x) -> Abatic(x))\n\nnot Stormy(malkah)\n\nArthritic(malkah) and forall x (Arthritic(x) -> Stormy(x)) -> therefore Stormy(malkah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The mort is sixfold. All subaqueous things are jovial. All jovial things are descendant. All sixfold things are jovial. Rough things are persistent. All persistent, sixfold things are jovial. Round, persistent things are descendant. The mort is descendant.", "logic": "\nSixfold(mort)\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) -> Jovial(x))\nforall x (Jovial(x) -> Descendant(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) -> Jovial(x))\nforall x (Descendant(x) -> Persistent(x))\nforall x (Persistent(x) and Sixfold(x) -> Jovial(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and Persistent(x) -> Descendant(x))\n\nDescendant(mort)\n\nSixfold(mort) and forall x (Sixfold(x) -> Jovial(x)) -> therefore Jovial(mort) Jovial(mort) and forall x (Jovial(x) -> Descendant(x)) -> therefore Descendant(mort)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The tamarra is testicular. All brunet things are scabrous. All scabrous things are ceruminous. All testicular things are scabrous. Rough things are plaguy. All plaguy, testicular things are scabrous. Round, plaguy things are ceruminous. The tamarra is not ceruminous.", "logic": "\nTesticular(tamarra)\nforall x (Brunet(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Testicular(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and Testicular(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Testicular(x) and Plaguy(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\n\nnot Ceruminous(tamarra)\n\nTesticular(tamarra) and forall x (Testicular(x) -> Scabrous(x)) -> therefore Scabrous(tamarra) Scabrous(tamarra) and forall x (Scabrous(x) -> Ceruminous(x)) -> therefore Ceruminous(tamarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The valeria is bengali. All serpentine things are untainted. All untainted things are worldwide. All bengali things are untainted. Rough things are spinal. All spinal, bengali things are untainted. Round, spinal things are worldwide. The valeria is spinal.", "logic": "\nBengali(valeria)\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Untainted(x))\nforall x (Untainted(x) -> Worldwide(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) -> Untainted(x))\nforall x (Worldwide(x) -> Spinal(x))\nforall x (Spinal(x) and Bengali(x) -> Untainted(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) and Spinal(x) -> Worldwide(x))\n\nSpinal(valeria)\n\nBengali(valeria) and forall x (Bengali(x) -> Untainted(x)) -> therefore Untainted(valeria) Untainted(valeria) and forall x (Untainted(x) -> Worldwide(x)) -> therefore Worldwide(valeria) Worldwide(valeria) and forall x (Worldwide(x) -> Spinal(x)) -> therefore Spinal(valeria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The lorinda is ovarian. All twinkly things are polemical. All polemical things are tonsured. All ovarian things are polemical. Rough things are huxleian. All huxleian, ovarian things are polemical. Round, huxleian things are tonsured. The lorinda is not huxleian.", "logic": "\nOvarian(lorinda)\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Polemical(x))\nforall x (Polemical(x) -> Tonsured(x))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) -> Polemical(x))\nforall x (Tonsured(x) -> Huxleian(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) and Ovarian(x) -> Polemical(x))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) and Huxleian(x) -> Tonsured(x))\n\nnot Huxleian(lorinda)\n\nOvarian(lorinda) and forall x (Ovarian(x) -> Polemical(x)) -> therefore Polemical(lorinda) Polemical(lorinda) and forall x (Polemical(x) -> Tonsured(x)) -> therefore Tonsured(lorinda) Tonsured(lorinda) and forall x (Tonsured(x) -> Huxleian(x)) -> therefore Huxleian(lorinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The kitty is sporadic. All irresolute things are tweedy. All tweedy things are bended. All sporadic things are tweedy. Rough things are rugose. All rugose, sporadic things are tweedy. Round, rugose things are bended. The kitty does not need the kitty.", "logic": "\nSporadic(kitty)\nforall x (Irresolute(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Bended(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Bended(x) -> Rugose(x))\nforall x (Rugose(x) and Sporadic(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) and Rugose(x) -> Bended(x))\n\nnot Needs(kitty, kitty)\n\nnot Needs(kitty, kitty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The winthrop is diffusive. All reigning things are corymbose. All corymbose things are braggy. All diffusive things are corymbose. Rough things are prongy. All prongy, diffusive things are corymbose. Round, prongy things are braggy. The winthrop is reigning.", "logic": "\nDiffusive(winthrop)\nforall x (Reigning(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Corymbose(x) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Prongy(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) and Diffusive(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) and Prongy(x) -> Braggy(x))\n\nReigning(winthrop)\n\nReigning(winthrop) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The orion is emphasised. All spent things are historied. All historied things are rouged. All emphasised things are historied. Rough things are ridged. All ridged, emphasised things are historied. Round, ridged things are rouged. The orion does not like the orion.", "logic": "\nEmphasised(orion)\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Historied(x) -> Rouged(x))\nforall x (Emphasised(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Rouged(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Ridged(x) and Emphasised(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Emphasised(x) and Ridged(x) -> Rouged(x))\n\nnot Likes(orion, orion)\n\nnot Likes(orion, orion) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The tessie is unifilar. All pitted things are veracious. All veracious things are unvigilant. All unifilar things are veracious. Rough things are airlike. All airlike, unifilar things are veracious. Round, airlike things are unvigilant. The tessie chases the tessie.", "logic": "\nUnifilar(tessie)\nforall x (Pitted(x) -> Veracious(x))\nforall x (Veracious(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\nforall x (Unifilar(x) -> Veracious(x))\nforall x (Unvigilant(x) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Airlike(x) and Unifilar(x) -> Veracious(x))\nforall x (Unifilar(x) and Airlike(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\n\nChases(tessie, tessie)\n\nChases(tessie, tessie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The horatia is achromous. The horatia access the elliot. The karlyn fetter the horatia. The karlyn fetter the elliot. The karlyn is virginal. The karlyn is octagonal. The karlyn is achromous. The karlyn is circinate. The karlyn access the horatia. The karlyn access the elliot. The karlyn renew the horatia. The karlyn renew the elliot. The elliot fetter the horatia. The elliot is virginal. The elliot is asinine. If someone renew the karlyn then the karlyn access the horatia. If someone access the elliot then the elliot fetter the karlyn. If someone fetter the karlyn then they are octagonal. If someone renew the horatia then the horatia renew the elliot. If someone is achromous and they visit the elliot then they eat the karlyn. If someone fetter the elliot then they see the elliot. The karlyn access the elliot.", "logic": "\nAchromous(horatia)\nAccess(horatia, elliot)\nFetter(karlyn, horatia)\nFetter(karlyn, elliot)\nVirginal(karlyn)\nOctagonal(karlyn)\nAchromous(karlyn)\nCircinate(karlyn)\nAccess(karlyn, horatia)\nAccess(karlyn, elliot)\nRenew(karlyn, horatia)\nRenew(karlyn, elliot)\nFetter(elliot, horatia)\nVirginal(elliot)\nAsinine(elliot)\nforall x (Renew(x, karlyn) -> Access(karlyn, horatia))\nforall x (Access(x, elliot) -> Fetter(elliot, karlyn))\nforall x (Fetter(x, karlyn) -> Octagonal(x))\nforall x (Renew(x, horatia) -> Renew(horatia, elliot))\nforall x (Achromous(x) and Renew(x, elliot) -> Fetter(x, karlyn))\nforall x (Fetter(x, elliot) -> Access(x, elliot))\n\nAccess(karlyn, elliot)\n\ntherefore Access(karlyn, elliot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The whitney is pictured. The whitney aphorise the barron. The gabbey equalize the whitney. The gabbey equalize the barron. The gabbey is chiliastic. The gabbey is cheapjack. The gabbey is pictured. The gabbey is soleless. The gabbey aphorise the whitney. The gabbey aphorise the barron. The gabbey wilt the whitney. The gabbey wilt the barron. The barron equalize the whitney. The barron is chiliastic. The barron is final. If someone wilt the gabbey then the gabbey aphorise the whitney. If someone aphorise the barron then the barron equalize the gabbey. If someone equalize the gabbey then they are cheapjack. If someone wilt the whitney then the whitney wilt the barron. If someone is pictured and they visit the barron then they eat the gabbey. If someone equalize the barron then they see the barron. The gabbey is not cheapjack.", "logic": "\nPictured(whitney)\nAphorise(whitney, barron)\nEqualize(gabbey, whitney)\nEqualize(gabbey, barron)\nChiliastic(gabbey)\nCheapjack(gabbey)\nPictured(gabbey)\nSoleless(gabbey)\nAphorise(gabbey, whitney)\nAphorise(gabbey, barron)\nWilt(gabbey, whitney)\nWilt(gabbey, barron)\nEqualize(barron, whitney)\nChiliastic(barron)\nFinal(barron)\nforall x (Wilt(x, gabbey) -> Aphorise(gabbey, whitney))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, barron) -> Equalize(barron, gabbey))\nforall x (Equalize(x, gabbey) -> Cheapjack(x))\nforall x (Wilt(x, whitney) -> Wilt(whitney, barron))\nforall x (Pictured(x) and Wilt(x, barron) -> Equalize(x, gabbey))\nforall x (Equalize(x, barron) -> Aphorise(x, barron))\n\nnot Cheapjack(gabbey)\n\ntherefore Cheapjack(gabbey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The kirbee is billiard. The kirbee insulate the leif. The son chirp the kirbee. The son chirp the leif. The son is wrothful. The son is monocled. The son is billiard. The son is indurate. The son insulate the kirbee. The son insulate the leif. The son instal the kirbee. The son instal the leif. The leif chirp the kirbee. The leif is wrothful. The leif is sanious. If someone instal the son then the son insulate the kirbee. If someone insulate the leif then the leif chirp the son. If someone chirp the son then they are monocled. If someone instal the kirbee then the kirbee instal the leif. If someone is billiard and they visit the leif then they eat the son. If someone chirp the leif then they see the leif. The kirbee instal the leif.", "logic": "\nBilliard(kirbee)\nInsulate(kirbee, leif)\nChirp(son, kirbee)\nChirp(son, leif)\nWrothful(son)\nMonocled(son)\nBilliard(son)\nIndurate(son)\nInsulate(son, kirbee)\nInsulate(son, leif)\nInstal(son, kirbee)\nInstal(son, leif)\nChirp(leif, kirbee)\nWrothful(leif)\nSanious(leif)\nforall x (Instal(x, son) -> Insulate(son, kirbee))\nforall x (Insulate(x, leif) -> Chirp(leif, son))\nforall x (Chirp(x, son) -> Monocled(x))\nforall x (Instal(x, kirbee) -> Instal(kirbee, leif))\nforall x (Billiard(x) and Instal(x, leif) -> Chirp(x, son))\nforall x (Chirp(x, leif) -> Insulate(x, leif))\n\nInstal(kirbee, leif)\n\nInstal(son, kirbee) and forall x (Instal(x, kirbee) -> Instal(kirbee, leif)) -> therefore Instal(kirbee, leif)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The briteny is intuitive. The briteny catcall the selle. The roana bounce the briteny. The roana bounce the selle. The roana is stock. The roana is artless. The roana is intuitive. The roana is deliberate. The roana catcall the briteny. The roana catcall the selle. The roana moot the briteny. The roana moot the selle. The selle bounce the briteny. The selle is stock. The selle is newsworthy. If someone moot the roana then the roana catcall the briteny. If someone catcall the selle then the selle bounce the roana. If someone bounce the roana then they are artless. If someone moot the briteny then the briteny moot the selle. If someone is intuitive and they visit the selle then they eat the roana. If someone bounce the selle then they see the selle. The briteny does not visit the selle.", "logic": "\nIntuitive(briteny)\nCatcall(briteny, selle)\nBounce(roana, briteny)\nBounce(roana, selle)\nStock(roana)\nArtless(roana)\nIntuitive(roana)\nDeliberate(roana)\nCatcall(roana, briteny)\nCatcall(roana, selle)\nMoot(roana, briteny)\nMoot(roana, selle)\nBounce(selle, briteny)\nStock(selle)\nNewsworthy(selle)\nforall x (Moot(x, roana) -> Catcall(roana, briteny))\nforall x (Catcall(x, selle) -> Bounce(selle, roana))\nforall x (Bounce(x, roana) -> Artless(x))\nforall x (Moot(x, briteny) -> Moot(briteny, selle))\nforall x (Intuitive(x) and Moot(x, selle) -> Bounce(x, roana))\nforall x (Bounce(x, selle) -> Catcall(x, selle))\n\nnot Moot(briteny, selle)\n\nMoot(roana, briteny) and forall x (Moot(x, briteny) -> Moot(briteny, selle)) -> therefore Moot(briteny, selle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The cinnamon is perfected. The cinnamon rhyme the julina. The olin resorb the cinnamon. The olin resorb the julina. The olin is needed. The olin is farming. The olin is perfected. The olin is nectarous. The olin rhyme the cinnamon. The olin rhyme the julina. The olin average the cinnamon. The olin average the julina. The julina resorb the cinnamon. The julina is needed. The julina is wondering. If someone average the olin then the olin rhyme the cinnamon. If someone rhyme the julina then the julina resorb the olin. If someone resorb the olin then they are farming. If someone average the cinnamon then the cinnamon average the julina. If someone is perfected and they visit the julina then they eat the olin. If someone resorb the julina then they see the julina. The julina is farming.", "logic": "\nPerfected(cinnamon)\nRhyme(cinnamon, julina)\nResorb(olin, cinnamon)\nResorb(olin, julina)\nNeeded(olin)\nFarming(olin)\nPerfected(olin)\nNectarous(olin)\nRhyme(olin, cinnamon)\nRhyme(olin, julina)\nAverage(olin, cinnamon)\nAverage(olin, julina)\nResorb(julina, cinnamon)\nNeeded(julina)\nWondering(julina)\nforall x (Average(x, olin) -> Rhyme(olin, cinnamon))\nforall x (Rhyme(x, julina) -> Resorb(julina, olin))\nforall x (Resorb(x, olin) -> Farming(x))\nforall x (Average(x, cinnamon) -> Average(cinnamon, julina))\nforall x (Perfected(x) and Average(x, julina) -> Resorb(x, olin))\nforall x (Resorb(x, julina) -> Rhyme(x, julina))\n\nFarming(julina)\n\nRhyme(olin, julina) and forall x (Rhyme(x, julina) -> Resorb(julina, olin)) -> therefore Resorb(julina, olin) Resorb(julina, olin) and forall x (Resorb(x, olin) -> Farming(x)) -> therefore Farming(julina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The leyla is covariant. The leyla capsulise the kraig. The rice overwinter the leyla. The rice overwinter the kraig. The rice is dented. The rice is pursuant. The rice is covariant. The rice is isotropous. The rice capsulise the leyla. The rice capsulise the kraig. The rice gobble the leyla. The rice gobble the kraig. The kraig overwinter the leyla. The kraig is dented. The kraig is excitant. If someone gobble the rice then the rice capsulise the leyla. If someone capsulise the kraig then the kraig overwinter the rice. If someone overwinter the rice then they are pursuant. If someone gobble the leyla then the leyla gobble the kraig. If someone is covariant and they visit the kraig then they eat the rice. If someone overwinter the kraig then they see the kraig. The leyla does not eat the rice.", "logic": "\nCovariant(leyla)\nCapsulise(leyla, kraig)\nOverwinter(rice, leyla)\nOverwinter(rice, kraig)\nDented(rice)\nPursuant(rice)\nCovariant(rice)\nIsotropous(rice)\nCapsulise(rice, leyla)\nCapsulise(rice, kraig)\nGobble(rice, leyla)\nGobble(rice, kraig)\nOverwinter(kraig, leyla)\nDented(kraig)\nExcitant(kraig)\nforall x (Gobble(x, rice) -> Capsulise(rice, leyla))\nforall x (Capsulise(x, kraig) -> Overwinter(kraig, rice))\nforall x (Overwinter(x, rice) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Gobble(x, leyla) -> Gobble(leyla, kraig))\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Gobble(x, kraig) -> Overwinter(x, rice))\nforall x (Overwinter(x, kraig) -> Capsulise(x, kraig))\n\nnot Overwinter(leyla, rice)\n\nGobble(rice, leyla) and forall x (Gobble(x, leyla) -> Gobble(leyla, kraig)) -> therefore Gobble(leyla, kraig) Covariant(leyla) and Gobble(leyla, kraig) and forall x (Covariant(x) and Gobble(x, kraig) -> Overwinter(x, rice)) -> therefore Overwinter(leyla, rice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The avi is blemished. The avi revoke the saxe. The marshal permit the avi. The marshal permit the saxe. The marshal is improvised. The marshal is spoilable. The marshal is blemished. The marshal is nonmoving. The marshal revoke the avi. The marshal revoke the saxe. The marshal mushroom the avi. The marshal mushroom the saxe. The saxe permit the avi. The saxe is improvised. The saxe is endoergic. If someone mushroom the marshal then the marshal revoke the avi. If someone revoke the saxe then the saxe permit the marshal. If someone permit the marshal then they are spoilable. If someone mushroom the avi then the avi mushroom the saxe. If someone is blemished and they visit the saxe then they eat the marshal. If someone permit the saxe then they see the saxe. The avi is spoilable.", "logic": "\nBlemished(avi)\nRevoke(avi, saxe)\nPermit(marshal, avi)\nPermit(marshal, saxe)\nImprovised(marshal)\nSpoilable(marshal)\nBlemished(marshal)\nNonmoving(marshal)\nRevoke(marshal, avi)\nRevoke(marshal, saxe)\nMushroom(marshal, avi)\nMushroom(marshal, saxe)\nPermit(saxe, avi)\nImprovised(saxe)\nEndoergic(saxe)\nforall x (Mushroom(x, marshal) -> Revoke(marshal, avi))\nforall x (Revoke(x, saxe) -> Permit(saxe, marshal))\nforall x (Permit(x, marshal) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, avi) -> Mushroom(avi, saxe))\nforall x (Blemished(x) and Mushroom(x, saxe) -> Permit(x, marshal))\nforall x (Permit(x, saxe) -> Revoke(x, saxe))\n\nSpoilable(avi)\n\nMushroom(marshal, avi) and forall x (Mushroom(x, avi) -> Mushroom(avi, saxe)) -> therefore Mushroom(avi, saxe) Blemished(avi) and Mushroom(avi, saxe) and forall x (Blemished(x) and Mushroom(x, saxe) -> Permit(x, marshal)) -> therefore Permit(avi, marshal) Permit(avi, marshal) and forall x (Permit(x, marshal) -> Spoilable(x)) -> therefore Spoilable(avi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The deirdre is diminished. The deirdre venesect the mandy. The mable croak the deirdre. The mable croak the mandy. The mable is underwater. The mable is fragile. The mable is diminished. The mable is knackered. The mable venesect the deirdre. The mable venesect the mandy. The mable yodel the deirdre. The mable yodel the mandy. The mandy croak the deirdre. The mandy is underwater. The mandy is wilful. If someone yodel the mable then the mable venesect the deirdre. If someone venesect the mandy then the mandy croak the mable. If someone croak the mable then they are fragile. If someone yodel the deirdre then the deirdre yodel the mandy. If someone is diminished and they visit the mandy then they eat the mable. If someone croak the mandy then they see the mandy. The deirdre is not fragile.", "logic": "\nDiminished(deirdre)\nVenesect(deirdre, mandy)\nCroak(mable, deirdre)\nCroak(mable, mandy)\nUnderwater(mable)\nFragile(mable)\nDiminished(mable)\nKnackered(mable)\nVenesect(mable, deirdre)\nVenesect(mable, mandy)\nYodel(mable, deirdre)\nYodel(mable, mandy)\nCroak(mandy, deirdre)\nUnderwater(mandy)\nWilful(mandy)\nforall x (Yodel(x, mable) -> Venesect(mable, deirdre))\nforall x (Venesect(x, mandy) -> Croak(mandy, mable))\nforall x (Croak(x, mable) -> Fragile(x))\nforall x (Yodel(x, deirdre) -> Yodel(deirdre, mandy))\nforall x (Diminished(x) and Yodel(x, mandy) -> Croak(x, mable))\nforall x (Croak(x, mandy) -> Venesect(x, mandy))\n\nnot Fragile(deirdre)\n\nYodel(mable, deirdre) and forall x (Yodel(x, deirdre) -> Yodel(deirdre, mandy)) -> therefore Yodel(deirdre, mandy) Diminished(deirdre) and Yodel(deirdre, mandy) and forall x (Diminished(x) and Yodel(x, mandy) -> Croak(x, mable)) -> therefore Croak(deirdre, mable) Croak(deirdre, mable) and forall x (Croak(x, mable) -> Fragile(x)) -> therefore Fragile(deirdre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The ada is wieldy. The ada epitomise the demetrius. The arielle debar the ada. The arielle debar the demetrius. The arielle is narcotised. The arielle is ampullar. The arielle is wieldy. The arielle is opportune. The arielle epitomise the ada. The arielle epitomise the demetrius. The arielle allocate the ada. The arielle allocate the demetrius. The demetrius debar the ada. The demetrius is narcotised. The demetrius is ordered. If someone allocate the arielle then the arielle epitomise the ada. If someone epitomise the demetrius then the demetrius debar the arielle. If someone debar the arielle then they are ampullar. If someone allocate the ada then the ada allocate the demetrius. If someone is wieldy and they visit the demetrius then they eat the arielle. If someone debar the demetrius then they see the demetrius. The demetrius does not see the demetrius.", "logic": "\nWieldy(ada)\nEpitomise(ada, demetrius)\nDebar(arielle, ada)\nDebar(arielle, demetrius)\nNarcotised(arielle)\nAmpullar(arielle)\nWieldy(arielle)\nOpportune(arielle)\nEpitomise(arielle, ada)\nEpitomise(arielle, demetrius)\nAllocate(arielle, ada)\nAllocate(arielle, demetrius)\nDebar(demetrius, ada)\nNarcotised(demetrius)\nOrdered(demetrius)\nforall x (Allocate(x, arielle) -> Epitomise(arielle, ada))\nforall x (Epitomise(x, demetrius) -> Debar(demetrius, arielle))\nforall x (Debar(x, arielle) -> Ampullar(x))\nforall x (Allocate(x, ada) -> Allocate(ada, demetrius))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and Allocate(x, demetrius) -> Debar(x, arielle))\nforall x (Debar(x, demetrius) -> Epitomise(x, demetrius))\n\nnot Epitomise(demetrius, demetrius)\n\nforall x (Debar(x, demetrius) -> Epitomise(x, demetrius)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The trip is plodding. The trip scandalise the halette. The vanessa donate the trip. The vanessa donate the halette. The vanessa is middling. The vanessa is baleful. The vanessa is plodding. The vanessa is paintable. The vanessa scandalise the trip. The vanessa scandalise the halette. The vanessa examine the trip. The vanessa examine the halette. The halette donate the trip. The halette is middling. The halette is boorish. If someone examine the vanessa then the vanessa scandalise the trip. If someone scandalise the halette then the halette donate the vanessa. If someone donate the vanessa then they are baleful. If someone examine the trip then the trip examine the halette. If someone is plodding and they visit the halette then they eat the vanessa. If someone donate the halette then they see the halette. The trip examine the trip.", "logic": "\nPlodding(trip)\nScandalise(trip, halette)\nDonate(vanessa, trip)\nDonate(vanessa, halette)\nMiddling(vanessa)\nBaleful(vanessa)\nPlodding(vanessa)\nPaintable(vanessa)\nScandalise(vanessa, trip)\nScandalise(vanessa, halette)\nExamine(vanessa, trip)\nExamine(vanessa, halette)\nDonate(halette, trip)\nMiddling(halette)\nBoorish(halette)\nforall x (Examine(x, vanessa) -> Scandalise(vanessa, trip))\nforall x (Scandalise(x, halette) -> Donate(halette, vanessa))\nforall x (Donate(x, vanessa) -> Baleful(x))\nforall x (Examine(x, trip) -> Examine(trip, halette))\nforall x (Plodding(x) and Examine(x, halette) -> Donate(x, vanessa))\nforall x (Donate(x, halette) -> Scandalise(x, halette))\n\nExamine(trip, trip)\n\nExamine(trip, trip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The renato is taxonomic. The renato scour the denni. The leisha resift the renato. The leisha resift the denni. The leisha is tyrannic. The leisha is uniovulate. The leisha is taxonomic. The leisha is knotted. The leisha scour the renato. The leisha scour the denni. The leisha comminute the renato. The leisha comminute the denni. The denni resift the renato. The denni is tyrannic. The denni is adjuratory. If someone comminute the leisha then the leisha scour the renato. If someone scour the denni then the denni resift the leisha. If someone resift the leisha then they are uniovulate. If someone comminute the renato then the renato comminute the denni. If someone is taxonomic and they visit the denni then they eat the leisha. If someone resift the denni then they see the denni. The renato does not eat the denni.", "logic": "\nTaxonomic(renato)\nScour(renato, denni)\nResift(leisha, renato)\nResift(leisha, denni)\nTyrannic(leisha)\nUniovulate(leisha)\nTaxonomic(leisha)\nKnotted(leisha)\nScour(leisha, renato)\nScour(leisha, denni)\nComminute(leisha, renato)\nComminute(leisha, denni)\nResift(denni, renato)\nTyrannic(denni)\nAdjuratory(denni)\nforall x (Comminute(x, leisha) -> Scour(leisha, renato))\nforall x (Scour(x, denni) -> Resift(denni, leisha))\nforall x (Resift(x, leisha) -> Uniovulate(x))\nforall x (Comminute(x, renato) -> Comminute(renato, denni))\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) and Comminute(x, denni) -> Resift(x, leisha))\nforall x (Resift(x, denni) -> Scour(x, denni))\n\nnot Resift(renato, denni)\n\nnot Resift(renato, denni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The trixi is decorated. The trixi munch the aurelea. The thorndike amend the trixi. The thorndike amend the aurelea. The thorndike is scalable. The thorndike is viselike. The thorndike is decorated. The thorndike is gaping. The thorndike munch the trixi. The thorndike munch the aurelea. The thorndike foreshow the trixi. The thorndike foreshow the aurelea. The aurelea amend the trixi. The aurelea is scalable. The aurelea is reflecting. If someone foreshow the thorndike then the thorndike munch the trixi. If someone munch the aurelea then the aurelea amend the thorndike. If someone amend the thorndike then they are viselike. If someone foreshow the trixi then the trixi foreshow the aurelea. If someone is decorated and they visit the aurelea then they eat the thorndike. If someone amend the aurelea then they see the aurelea. The aurelea is decorated.", "logic": "\nDecorated(trixi)\nMunch(trixi, aurelea)\nAmend(thorndike, trixi)\nAmend(thorndike, aurelea)\nScalable(thorndike)\nViselike(thorndike)\nDecorated(thorndike)\nGaping(thorndike)\nMunch(thorndike, trixi)\nMunch(thorndike, aurelea)\nForeshow(thorndike, trixi)\nForeshow(thorndike, aurelea)\nAmend(aurelea, trixi)\nScalable(aurelea)\nReflecting(aurelea)\nforall x (Foreshow(x, thorndike) -> Munch(thorndike, trixi))\nforall x (Munch(x, aurelea) -> Amend(aurelea, thorndike))\nforall x (Amend(x, thorndike) -> Viselike(x))\nforall x (Foreshow(x, trixi) -> Foreshow(trixi, aurelea))\nforall x (Decorated(x) and Foreshow(x, aurelea) -> Amend(x, thorndike))\nforall x (Amend(x, aurelea) -> Munch(x, aurelea))\n\nDecorated(aurelea)\n\nDecorated(aurelea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The kenna is tagged. The kenna drip the josy. The erda reprobate the kenna. The erda reprobate the josy. The erda is cervine. The erda is decreased. The erda is tagged. The erda is whacking. The erda drip the kenna. The erda drip the josy. The erda shiver the kenna. The erda shiver the josy. The josy reprobate the kenna. The josy is cervine. The josy is antepartum. If someone shiver the erda then the erda drip the kenna. If someone drip the josy then the josy reprobate the erda. If someone reprobate the erda then they are decreased. If someone shiver the kenna then the kenna shiver the josy. If someone is tagged and they visit the josy then they eat the erda. If someone reprobate the josy then they see the josy. The erda does not see the erda.", "logic": "\nTagged(kenna)\nDrip(kenna, josy)\nReprobate(erda, kenna)\nReprobate(erda, josy)\nCervine(erda)\nDecreased(erda)\nTagged(erda)\nWhacking(erda)\nDrip(erda, kenna)\nDrip(erda, josy)\nShiver(erda, kenna)\nShiver(erda, josy)\nReprobate(josy, kenna)\nCervine(josy)\nAntepartum(josy)\nforall x (Shiver(x, erda) -> Drip(erda, kenna))\nforall x (Drip(x, josy) -> Reprobate(josy, erda))\nforall x (Reprobate(x, erda) -> Decreased(x))\nforall x (Shiver(x, kenna) -> Shiver(kenna, josy))\nforall x (Tagged(x) and Shiver(x, josy) -> Reprobate(x, erda))\nforall x (Reprobate(x, josy) -> Drip(x, josy))\n\nnot Drip(erda, erda)\n\nnot Drip(erda, erda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The winslow is pissed. The winslow interest the marieann. The rosette scrutinise the winslow. The rosette scrutinise the marieann. The rosette is comic. The rosette is funded. The rosette is pissed. The rosette is palmlike. The rosette interest the winslow. The rosette interest the marieann. The rosette quantify the winslow. The rosette quantify the marieann. The marieann scrutinise the winslow. The marieann is comic. The marieann is summery. If someone quantify the rosette then the rosette interest the winslow. If someone interest the marieann then the marieann scrutinise the rosette. If someone scrutinise the rosette then they are funded. If someone quantify the winslow then the winslow quantify the marieann. If someone is pissed and they visit the marieann then they eat the rosette. If someone scrutinise the marieann then they see the marieann. The winslow is summery.", "logic": "\nPissed(winslow)\nInterest(winslow, marieann)\nScrutinise(rosette, winslow)\nScrutinise(rosette, marieann)\nComic(rosette)\nFunded(rosette)\nPissed(rosette)\nPalmlike(rosette)\nInterest(rosette, winslow)\nInterest(rosette, marieann)\nQuantify(rosette, winslow)\nQuantify(rosette, marieann)\nScrutinise(marieann, winslow)\nComic(marieann)\nSummery(marieann)\nforall x (Quantify(x, rosette) -> Interest(rosette, winslow))\nforall x (Interest(x, marieann) -> Scrutinise(marieann, rosette))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, rosette) -> Funded(x))\nforall x (Quantify(x, winslow) -> Quantify(winslow, marieann))\nforall x (Pissed(x) and Quantify(x, marieann) -> Scrutinise(x, rosette))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, marieann) -> Interest(x, marieann))\n\nSummery(winslow)\n\nSummery(winslow) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The deny is allometric. The deny teetotal the atlanta. The sandye chock the deny. The sandye chock the atlanta. The sandye is delusory. The sandye is labored. The sandye is allometric. The sandye is olden. The sandye teetotal the deny. The sandye teetotal the atlanta. The sandye foretell the deny. The sandye foretell the atlanta. The atlanta chock the deny. The atlanta is delusory. The atlanta is moslem. If someone foretell the sandye then the sandye teetotal the deny. If someone teetotal the atlanta then the atlanta chock the sandye. If someone chock the sandye then they are labored. If someone foretell the deny then the deny foretell the atlanta. If someone is allometric and they visit the atlanta then they eat the sandye. If someone chock the atlanta then they see the atlanta. The deny does not eat the deny.", "logic": "\nAllometric(deny)\nTeetotal(deny, atlanta)\nChock(sandye, deny)\nChock(sandye, atlanta)\nDelusory(sandye)\nLabored(sandye)\nAllometric(sandye)\nOlden(sandye)\nTeetotal(sandye, deny)\nTeetotal(sandye, atlanta)\nForetell(sandye, deny)\nForetell(sandye, atlanta)\nChock(atlanta, deny)\nDelusory(atlanta)\nMoslem(atlanta)\nforall x (Foretell(x, sandye) -> Teetotal(sandye, deny))\nforall x (Teetotal(x, atlanta) -> Chock(atlanta, sandye))\nforall x (Chock(x, sandye) -> Labored(x))\nforall x (Foretell(x, deny) -> Foretell(deny, atlanta))\nforall x (Allometric(x) and Foretell(x, atlanta) -> Chock(x, sandye))\nforall x (Chock(x, atlanta) -> Teetotal(x, atlanta))\n\nnot Chock(deny, deny)\n\nnot Chock(deny, deny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The gavriel is arbitrable. The gavriel wrack the hamid. The caterina slue the gavriel. The caterina slue the hamid. The caterina is bacteroid. The caterina is inhumed. The caterina is arbitrable. The caterina is upfront. The caterina wrack the gavriel. The caterina wrack the hamid. The caterina comfort the gavriel. The caterina comfort the hamid. The hamid slue the gavriel. The hamid is bacteroid. The hamid is ellipsoid. If someone comfort the caterina then the caterina wrack the gavriel. If someone wrack the hamid then the hamid slue the caterina. If someone slue the caterina then they are inhumed. If someone comfort the gavriel then the gavriel comfort the hamid. If someone is arbitrable and they visit the hamid then they eat the caterina. If someone slue the hamid then they see the hamid. The hamid comfort the caterina.", "logic": "\nArbitrable(gavriel)\nWrack(gavriel, hamid)\nSlue(caterina, gavriel)\nSlue(caterina, hamid)\nBacteroid(caterina)\nInhumed(caterina)\nArbitrable(caterina)\nUpfront(caterina)\nWrack(caterina, gavriel)\nWrack(caterina, hamid)\nComfort(caterina, gavriel)\nComfort(caterina, hamid)\nSlue(hamid, gavriel)\nBacteroid(hamid)\nEllipsoid(hamid)\nforall x (Comfort(x, caterina) -> Wrack(caterina, gavriel))\nforall x (Wrack(x, hamid) -> Slue(hamid, caterina))\nforall x (Slue(x, caterina) -> Inhumed(x))\nforall x (Comfort(x, gavriel) -> Comfort(gavriel, hamid))\nforall x (Arbitrable(x) and Comfort(x, hamid) -> Slue(x, caterina))\nforall x (Slue(x, hamid) -> Wrack(x, hamid))\n\nComfort(hamid, caterina)\n\nComfort(hamid, caterina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The chrissie undercut the cheslie. The chrissie confer the lenore. The chrissie is expiratory. The chrissie is unattired. The chrissie does not need the titus. The chrissie emboss the lenore. The cheslie is avertible. The cheslie emboss the titus. The titus undercut the cheslie. The titus confer the lenore. The titus is expiratory. The lenore undercut the titus. The lenore confer the cheslie. The lenore does not eat the titus. The lenore is bipolar. The lenore emboss the cheslie. If something undercut the titus then it is bipolar. If something emboss the titus then it emboss the cheslie. If something emboss the cheslie then it confer the cheslie. If the cheslie is bipolar then the cheslie emboss the lenore. If something confer the cheslie then it does not eat the lenore. If something undercut the lenore and the lenore does not eat the cheslie then the lenore is not unattired. If something is unattired then it is expiratory. If something confer the titus and it is expiratory then it does not chase the cheslie. The lenore emboss the cheslie.", "logic": "\nUndercut(chrissie, cheslie)\nConfer(chrissie, lenore)\nExpiratory(chrissie)\nUnattired(chrissie)\nnot Emboss(chrissie, titus)\nEmboss(chrissie, lenore)\nAvertible(cheslie)\nEmboss(cheslie, titus)\nUndercut(titus, cheslie)\nConfer(titus, lenore)\nExpiratory(titus)\nUndercut(lenore, titus)\nConfer(lenore, cheslie)\nnot Confer(lenore, titus)\nBipolar(lenore)\nEmboss(lenore, cheslie)\nforall x (Undercut(x, titus) -> Bipolar(x))\nforall x (Emboss(x, titus) -> Emboss(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Emboss(x, cheslie) -> Confer(x, cheslie))\nBipolar(cheslie) -> Emboss(cheslie, lenore)\nforall x (Confer(x, cheslie) -> not Confer(x, lenore))\nforall x (Undercut(x, lenore) and not Confer(lenore, cheslie) -> not Unattired(lenore))\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nforall x (Confer(x, titus) and Expiratory(x) -> not Undercut(x, cheslie))\n\nEmboss(lenore, cheslie)\n\ntherefore Emboss(lenore, cheslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The augusto herald the davidde. The augusto unpack the tobye. The augusto is theistical. The augusto is impassable. The augusto does not need the ardelle. The augusto right the tobye. The davidde is hurried. The davidde right the ardelle. The ardelle herald the davidde. The ardelle unpack the tobye. The ardelle is theistical. The tobye herald the ardelle. The tobye unpack the davidde. The tobye does not eat the ardelle. The tobye is squared. The tobye right the davidde. If something herald the ardelle then it is squared. If something right the ardelle then it right the davidde. If something right the davidde then it unpack the davidde. If the davidde is squared then the davidde right the tobye. If something unpack the davidde then it does not eat the tobye. If something herald the tobye and the tobye does not eat the davidde then the tobye is not impassable. If something is impassable then it is theistical. If something unpack the ardelle and it is theistical then it does not chase the davidde. The tobye does not eat the davidde.", "logic": "\nHerald(augusto, davidde)\nUnpack(augusto, tobye)\nTheistical(augusto)\nImpassable(augusto)\nnot Right(augusto, ardelle)\nRight(augusto, tobye)\nHurried(davidde)\nRight(davidde, ardelle)\nHerald(ardelle, davidde)\nUnpack(ardelle, tobye)\nTheistical(ardelle)\nHerald(tobye, ardelle)\nUnpack(tobye, davidde)\nnot Unpack(tobye, ardelle)\nSquared(tobye)\nRight(tobye, davidde)\nforall x (Herald(x, ardelle) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Right(x, ardelle) -> Right(x, davidde))\nforall x (Right(x, davidde) -> Unpack(x, davidde))\nSquared(davidde) -> Right(davidde, tobye)\nforall x (Unpack(x, davidde) -> not Unpack(x, tobye))\nforall x (Herald(x, tobye) and not Unpack(tobye, davidde) -> not Impassable(tobye))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Theistical(x))\nforall x (Unpack(x, ardelle) and Theistical(x) -> not Herald(x, davidde))\n\nnot Unpack(tobye, davidde)\n\ntherefore Unpack(tobye, davidde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The jehu decolonize the anastasie. The jehu resift the philippe. The jehu is unsubdued. The jehu is frizzy. The jehu does not need the flower. The jehu cube the philippe. The anastasie is acidulous. The anastasie cube the flower. The flower decolonize the anastasie. The flower resift the philippe. The flower is unsubdued. The philippe decolonize the flower. The philippe resift the anastasie. The philippe does not eat the flower. The philippe is austere. The philippe cube the anastasie. If something decolonize the flower then it is austere. If something cube the flower then it cube the anastasie. If something cube the anastasie then it resift the anastasie. If the anastasie is austere then the anastasie cube the philippe. If something resift the anastasie then it does not eat the philippe. If something decolonize the philippe and the philippe does not eat the anastasie then the philippe is not frizzy. If something is frizzy then it is unsubdued. If something resift the flower and it is unsubdued then it does not chase the anastasie. The philippe does not eat the philippe.", "logic": "\nDecolonize(jehu, anastasie)\nResift(jehu, philippe)\nUnsubdued(jehu)\nFrizzy(jehu)\nnot Cube(jehu, flower)\nCube(jehu, philippe)\nAcidulous(anastasie)\nCube(anastasie, flower)\nDecolonize(flower, anastasie)\nResift(flower, philippe)\nUnsubdued(flower)\nDecolonize(philippe, flower)\nResift(philippe, anastasie)\nnot Resift(philippe, flower)\nAustere(philippe)\nCube(philippe, anastasie)\nforall x (Decolonize(x, flower) -> Austere(x))\nforall x (Cube(x, flower) -> Cube(x, anastasie))\nforall x (Cube(x, anastasie) -> Resift(x, anastasie))\nAustere(anastasie) -> Cube(anastasie, philippe)\nforall x (Resift(x, anastasie) -> not Resift(x, philippe))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, philippe) and not Resift(philippe, anastasie) -> not Frizzy(philippe))\nforall x (Frizzy(x) -> Unsubdued(x))\nforall x (Resift(x, flower) and Unsubdued(x) -> not Decolonize(x, anastasie))\n\nnot Resift(philippe, philippe)\n\nResift(philippe, anastasie) and forall x (Resift(x, anastasie) -> not Resift(x, philippe)) -> therefore not Resift(philippe, philippe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The baird distend the koral. The baird overrule the rafe. The baird is earned. The baird is basilar. The baird does not need the tim. The baird increase the rafe. The koral is salverform. The koral increase the tim. The tim distend the koral. The tim overrule the rafe. The tim is earned. The rafe distend the tim. The rafe overrule the koral. The rafe does not eat the tim. The rafe is defeated. The rafe increase the koral. If something distend the tim then it is defeated. If something increase the tim then it increase the koral. If something increase the koral then it overrule the koral. If the koral is defeated then the koral increase the rafe. If something overrule the koral then it does not eat the rafe. If something distend the rafe and the rafe does not eat the koral then the rafe is not basilar. If something is basilar then it is earned. If something overrule the tim and it is earned then it does not chase the koral. The koral does not need the koral.", "logic": "\nDistend(baird, koral)\nOverrule(baird, rafe)\nEarned(baird)\nBasilar(baird)\nnot Increase(baird, tim)\nIncrease(baird, rafe)\nSalverform(koral)\nIncrease(koral, tim)\nDistend(tim, koral)\nOverrule(tim, rafe)\nEarned(tim)\nDistend(rafe, tim)\nOverrule(rafe, koral)\nnot Overrule(rafe, tim)\nDefeated(rafe)\nIncrease(rafe, koral)\nforall x (Distend(x, tim) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Increase(x, tim) -> Increase(x, koral))\nforall x (Increase(x, koral) -> Overrule(x, koral))\nDefeated(koral) -> Increase(koral, rafe)\nforall x (Overrule(x, koral) -> not Overrule(x, rafe))\nforall x (Distend(x, rafe) and not Overrule(rafe, koral) -> not Basilar(rafe))\nforall x (Basilar(x) -> Earned(x))\nforall x (Overrule(x, tim) and Earned(x) -> not Distend(x, koral))\n\nnot Increase(koral, koral)\n\nIncrease(koral, tim) and forall x (Increase(x, tim) -> Increase(x, koral)) -> therefore Increase(koral, koral)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The joli filter the ardella. The joli dillydally the chaddy. The joli is repressed. The joli is accusative. The joli does not need the melba. The joli ting the chaddy. The ardella is unsmiling. The ardella ting the melba. The melba filter the ardella. The melba dillydally the chaddy. The melba is repressed. The chaddy filter the melba. The chaddy dillydally the ardella. The chaddy does not eat the melba. The chaddy is tranquil. The chaddy ting the ardella. If something filter the melba then it is tranquil. If something ting the melba then it ting the ardella. If something ting the ardella then it dillydally the ardella. If the ardella is tranquil then the ardella ting the chaddy. If something dillydally the ardella then it does not eat the chaddy. If something filter the chaddy and the chaddy does not eat the ardella then the chaddy is not accusative. If something is accusative then it is repressed. If something dillydally the melba and it is repressed then it does not chase the ardella. The ardella dillydally the ardella.", "logic": "\nFilter(joli, ardella)\nDillydally(joli, chaddy)\nRepressed(joli)\nAccusative(joli)\nnot Ting(joli, melba)\nTing(joli, chaddy)\nUnsmiling(ardella)\nTing(ardella, melba)\nFilter(melba, ardella)\nDillydally(melba, chaddy)\nRepressed(melba)\nFilter(chaddy, melba)\nDillydally(chaddy, ardella)\nnot Dillydally(chaddy, melba)\nTranquil(chaddy)\nTing(chaddy, ardella)\nforall x (Filter(x, melba) -> Tranquil(x))\nforall x (Ting(x, melba) -> Ting(x, ardella))\nforall x (Ting(x, ardella) -> Dillydally(x, ardella))\nTranquil(ardella) -> Ting(ardella, chaddy)\nforall x (Dillydally(x, ardella) -> not Dillydally(x, chaddy))\nforall x (Filter(x, chaddy) and not Dillydally(chaddy, ardella) -> not Accusative(chaddy))\nforall x (Accusative(x) -> Repressed(x))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, melba) and Repressed(x) -> not Filter(x, ardella))\n\nDillydally(ardella, ardella)\n\nTing(ardella, melba) and forall x (Ting(x, melba) -> Ting(x, ardella)) -> therefore Ting(ardella, ardella) Ting(ardella, ardella) and forall x (Ting(x, ardella) -> Dillydally(x, ardella)) -> therefore Dillydally(ardella, ardella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The aubrie fuck the fae. The aubrie hightail the rustie. The aubrie is hogged. The aubrie is bituminous. The aubrie does not need the brant. The aubrie coalesce the rustie. The fae is brut. The fae coalesce the brant. The brant fuck the fae. The brant hightail the rustie. The brant is hogged. The rustie fuck the brant. The rustie hightail the fae. The rustie does not eat the brant. The rustie is pierced. The rustie coalesce the fae. If something fuck the brant then it is pierced. If something coalesce the brant then it coalesce the fae. If something coalesce the fae then it hightail the fae. If the fae is pierced then the fae coalesce the rustie. If something hightail the fae then it does not eat the rustie. If something fuck the rustie and the rustie does not eat the fae then the rustie is not bituminous. If something is bituminous then it is hogged. If something hightail the brant and it is hogged then it does not chase the fae. The fae does not eat the fae.", "logic": "\nFuck(aubrie, fae)\nHightail(aubrie, rustie)\nHogged(aubrie)\nBituminous(aubrie)\nnot Coalesce(aubrie, brant)\nCoalesce(aubrie, rustie)\nBrut(fae)\nCoalesce(fae, brant)\nFuck(brant, fae)\nHightail(brant, rustie)\nHogged(brant)\nFuck(rustie, brant)\nHightail(rustie, fae)\nnot Hightail(rustie, brant)\nPierced(rustie)\nCoalesce(rustie, fae)\nforall x (Fuck(x, brant) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Coalesce(x, brant) -> Coalesce(x, fae))\nforall x (Coalesce(x, fae) -> Hightail(x, fae))\nPierced(fae) -> Coalesce(fae, rustie)\nforall x (Hightail(x, fae) -> not Hightail(x, rustie))\nforall x (Fuck(x, rustie) and not Hightail(rustie, fae) -> not Bituminous(rustie))\nforall x (Bituminous(x) -> Hogged(x))\nforall x (Hightail(x, brant) and Hogged(x) -> not Fuck(x, fae))\n\nnot Hightail(fae, fae)\n\nCoalesce(fae, brant) and forall x (Coalesce(x, brant) -> Coalesce(x, fae)) -> therefore Coalesce(fae, fae) Coalesce(fae, fae) and forall x (Coalesce(x, fae) -> Hightail(x, fae)) -> therefore Hightail(fae, fae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The leshia mobilise the marci. The leshia spread the marthena. The leshia is flip. The leshia is bicipital. The leshia does not need the gerta. The leshia wreak the marthena. The marci is moated. The marci wreak the gerta. The gerta mobilise the marci. The gerta spread the marthena. The gerta is flip. The marthena mobilise the gerta. The marthena spread the marci. The marthena does not eat the gerta. The marthena is fine. The marthena wreak the marci. If something mobilise the gerta then it is fine. If something wreak the gerta then it wreak the marci. If something wreak the marci then it spread the marci. If the marci is fine then the marci wreak the marthena. If something spread the marci then it does not eat the marthena. If something mobilise the marthena and the marthena does not eat the marci then the marthena is not bicipital. If something is bicipital then it is flip. If something spread the gerta and it is flip then it does not chase the marci. The marci does not eat the marthena.", "logic": "\nMobilise(leshia, marci)\nSpread(leshia, marthena)\nFlip(leshia)\nBicipital(leshia)\nnot Wreak(leshia, gerta)\nWreak(leshia, marthena)\nMoated(marci)\nWreak(marci, gerta)\nMobilise(gerta, marci)\nSpread(gerta, marthena)\nFlip(gerta)\nMobilise(marthena, gerta)\nSpread(marthena, marci)\nnot Spread(marthena, gerta)\nFine(marthena)\nWreak(marthena, marci)\nforall x (Mobilise(x, gerta) -> Fine(x))\nforall x (Wreak(x, gerta) -> Wreak(x, marci))\nforall x (Wreak(x, marci) -> Spread(x, marci))\nFine(marci) -> Wreak(marci, marthena)\nforall x (Spread(x, marci) -> not Spread(x, marthena))\nforall x (Mobilise(x, marthena) and not Spread(marthena, marci) -> not Bicipital(marthena))\nforall x (Bicipital(x) -> Flip(x))\nforall x (Spread(x, gerta) and Flip(x) -> not Mobilise(x, marci))\n\nnot Spread(marci, marthena)\n\nWreak(marci, gerta) and forall x (Wreak(x, gerta) -> Wreak(x, marci)) -> therefore Wreak(marci, marci) Wreak(marci, marci) and forall x (Wreak(x, marci) -> Spread(x, marci)) -> therefore Spread(marci, marci) Spread(marci, marci) and forall x (Spread(x, marci) -> not Spread(x, marthena)) -> therefore not Spread(marci, marthena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The wilbur authorize the roana. The wilbur collect the genevra. The wilbur is mediaeval. The wilbur is greatest. The wilbur does not need the giovanna. The wilbur plonk the genevra. The roana is plaguey. The roana plonk the giovanna. The giovanna authorize the roana. The giovanna collect the genevra. The giovanna is mediaeval. The genevra authorize the giovanna. The genevra collect the roana. The genevra does not eat the giovanna. The genevra is mocking. The genevra plonk the roana. If something authorize the giovanna then it is mocking. If something plonk the giovanna then it plonk the roana. If something plonk the roana then it collect the roana. If the roana is mocking then the roana plonk the genevra. If something collect the roana then it does not eat the genevra. If something authorize the genevra and the genevra does not eat the roana then the genevra is not greatest. If something is greatest then it is mediaeval. If something collect the giovanna and it is mediaeval then it does not chase the roana. The roana collect the genevra.", "logic": "\nAuthorize(wilbur, roana)\nCollect(wilbur, genevra)\nMediaeval(wilbur)\nGreatest(wilbur)\nnot Plonk(wilbur, giovanna)\nPlonk(wilbur, genevra)\nPlaguey(roana)\nPlonk(roana, giovanna)\nAuthorize(giovanna, roana)\nCollect(giovanna, genevra)\nMediaeval(giovanna)\nAuthorize(genevra, giovanna)\nCollect(genevra, roana)\nnot Collect(genevra, giovanna)\nMocking(genevra)\nPlonk(genevra, roana)\nforall x (Authorize(x, giovanna) -> Mocking(x))\nforall x (Plonk(x, giovanna) -> Plonk(x, roana))\nforall x (Plonk(x, roana) -> Collect(x, roana))\nMocking(roana) -> Plonk(roana, genevra)\nforall x (Collect(x, roana) -> not Collect(x, genevra))\nforall x (Authorize(x, genevra) and not Collect(genevra, roana) -> not Greatest(genevra))\nforall x (Greatest(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\nforall x (Collect(x, giovanna) and Mediaeval(x) -> not Authorize(x, roana))\n\nCollect(roana, genevra)\n\nPlonk(roana, giovanna) and forall x (Plonk(x, giovanna) -> Plonk(x, roana)) -> therefore Plonk(roana, roana) Plonk(roana, roana) and forall x (Plonk(x, roana) -> Collect(x, roana)) -> therefore Collect(roana, roana) Collect(roana, roana) and forall x (Collect(x, roana) -> not Collect(x, genevra)) -> therefore not Collect(roana, genevra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The hollyanne disable the manon. The hollyanne punt the joline. The hollyanne is unmannerly. The hollyanne is unreserved. The hollyanne does not need the tedda. The hollyanne misdeliver the joline. The manon is diastolic. The manon misdeliver the tedda. The tedda disable the manon. The tedda punt the joline. The tedda is unmannerly. The joline disable the tedda. The joline punt the manon. The joline does not eat the tedda. The joline is cautionary. The joline misdeliver the manon. If something disable the tedda then it is cautionary. If something misdeliver the tedda then it misdeliver the manon. If something misdeliver the manon then it punt the manon. If the manon is cautionary then the manon misdeliver the joline. If something punt the manon then it does not eat the joline. If something disable the joline and the joline does not eat the manon then the joline is not unreserved. If something is unreserved then it is unmannerly. If something punt the tedda and it is unmannerly then it does not chase the manon. The joline is not unmannerly.", "logic": "\nDisable(hollyanne, manon)\nPunt(hollyanne, joline)\nUnmannerly(hollyanne)\nUnreserved(hollyanne)\nnot Misdeliver(hollyanne, tedda)\nMisdeliver(hollyanne, joline)\nDiastolic(manon)\nMisdeliver(manon, tedda)\nDisable(tedda, manon)\nPunt(tedda, joline)\nUnmannerly(tedda)\nDisable(joline, tedda)\nPunt(joline, manon)\nnot Punt(joline, tedda)\nCautionary(joline)\nMisdeliver(joline, manon)\nforall x (Disable(x, tedda) -> Cautionary(x))\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, tedda) -> Misdeliver(x, manon))\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, manon) -> Punt(x, manon))\nCautionary(manon) -> Misdeliver(manon, joline)\nforall x (Punt(x, manon) -> not Punt(x, joline))\nforall x (Disable(x, joline) and not Punt(joline, manon) -> not Unreserved(joline))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) -> Unmannerly(x))\nforall x (Punt(x, tedda) and Unmannerly(x) -> not Disable(x, manon))\n\nnot Unmannerly(joline)\n\nforall x (Unreserved(x) -> Unmannerly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The johannes sensitise the uli. The johannes bebop the von. The johannes is seditious. The johannes is treated. The johannes does not need the fern. The johannes metrify the von. The uli is selected. The uli metrify the fern. The fern sensitise the uli. The fern bebop the von. The fern is seditious. The von sensitise the fern. The von bebop the uli. The von does not eat the fern. The von is unpurified. The von metrify the uli. If something sensitise the fern then it is unpurified. If something metrify the fern then it metrify the uli. If something metrify the uli then it bebop the uli. If the uli is unpurified then the uli metrify the von. If something bebop the uli then it does not eat the von. If something sensitise the von and the von does not eat the uli then the von is not treated. If something is treated then it is seditious. If something bebop the fern and it is seditious then it does not chase the uli. The uli metrify the von.", "logic": "\nSensitise(johannes, uli)\nBebop(johannes, von)\nSeditious(johannes)\nTreated(johannes)\nnot Metrify(johannes, fern)\nMetrify(johannes, von)\nSelected(uli)\nMetrify(uli, fern)\nSensitise(fern, uli)\nBebop(fern, von)\nSeditious(fern)\nSensitise(von, fern)\nBebop(von, uli)\nnot Bebop(von, fern)\nUnpurified(von)\nMetrify(von, uli)\nforall x (Sensitise(x, fern) -> Unpurified(x))\nforall x (Metrify(x, fern) -> Metrify(x, uli))\nforall x (Metrify(x, uli) -> Bebop(x, uli))\nUnpurified(uli) -> Metrify(uli, von)\nforall x (Bebop(x, uli) -> not Bebop(x, von))\nforall x (Sensitise(x, von) and not Bebop(von, uli) -> not Treated(von))\nforall x (Treated(x) -> Seditious(x))\nforall x (Bebop(x, fern) and Seditious(x) -> not Sensitise(x, uli))\n\nMetrify(uli, von)\n\nUnpurified(uli) -> Metrify(uli, von) <- forall x (Sensitise(x, fern) -> Unpurified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The donovan dogmatise the monte. The donovan dehisce the thibaut. The donovan is teutonic. The donovan is dreaded. The donovan does not need the bendite. The donovan tighten the thibaut. The monte is neandertal. The monte tighten the bendite. The bendite dogmatise the monte. The bendite dehisce the thibaut. The bendite is teutonic. The thibaut dogmatise the bendite. The thibaut dehisce the monte. The thibaut does not eat the bendite. The thibaut is plane. The thibaut tighten the monte. If something dogmatise the bendite then it is plane. If something tighten the bendite then it tighten the monte. If something tighten the monte then it dehisce the monte. If the monte is plane then the monte tighten the thibaut. If something dehisce the monte then it does not eat the thibaut. If something dogmatise the thibaut and the thibaut does not eat the monte then the thibaut is not dreaded. If something is dreaded then it is teutonic. If something dehisce the bendite and it is teutonic then it does not chase the monte. The bendite is not plane.", "logic": "\nDogmatise(donovan, monte)\nDehisce(donovan, thibaut)\nTeutonic(donovan)\nDreaded(donovan)\nnot Tighten(donovan, bendite)\nTighten(donovan, thibaut)\nNeandertal(monte)\nTighten(monte, bendite)\nDogmatise(bendite, monte)\nDehisce(bendite, thibaut)\nTeutonic(bendite)\nDogmatise(thibaut, bendite)\nDehisce(thibaut, monte)\nnot Dehisce(thibaut, bendite)\nPlane(thibaut)\nTighten(thibaut, monte)\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, bendite) -> Plane(x))\nforall x (Tighten(x, bendite) -> Tighten(x, monte))\nforall x (Tighten(x, monte) -> Dehisce(x, monte))\nPlane(monte) -> Tighten(monte, thibaut)\nforall x (Dehisce(x, monte) -> not Dehisce(x, thibaut))\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, thibaut) and not Dehisce(thibaut, monte) -> not Dreaded(thibaut))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Teutonic(x))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, bendite) and Teutonic(x) -> not Dogmatise(x, monte))\n\nnot Plane(bendite)\n\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, bendite) -> Plane(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The ora benficiate the tyson. The ora reassail the kevin. The ora is hindmost. The ora is dighted. The ora does not need the gabe. The ora promote the kevin. The tyson is irksome. The tyson promote the gabe. The gabe benficiate the tyson. The gabe reassail the kevin. The gabe is hindmost. The kevin benficiate the gabe. The kevin reassail the tyson. The kevin does not eat the gabe. The kevin is dormie. The kevin promote the tyson. If something benficiate the gabe then it is dormie. If something promote the gabe then it promote the tyson. If something promote the tyson then it reassail the tyson. If the tyson is dormie then the tyson promote the kevin. If something reassail the tyson then it does not eat the kevin. If something benficiate the kevin and the kevin does not eat the tyson then the kevin is not dighted. If something is dighted then it is hindmost. If something reassail the gabe and it is hindmost then it does not chase the tyson. The ora reassail the tyson.", "logic": "\nBenficiate(ora, tyson)\nReassail(ora, kevin)\nHindmost(ora)\nDighted(ora)\nnot Promote(ora, gabe)\nPromote(ora, kevin)\nIrksome(tyson)\nPromote(tyson, gabe)\nBenficiate(gabe, tyson)\nReassail(gabe, kevin)\nHindmost(gabe)\nBenficiate(kevin, gabe)\nReassail(kevin, tyson)\nnot Reassail(kevin, gabe)\nDormie(kevin)\nPromote(kevin, tyson)\nforall x (Benficiate(x, gabe) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Promote(x, gabe) -> Promote(x, tyson))\nforall x (Promote(x, tyson) -> Reassail(x, tyson))\nDormie(tyson) -> Promote(tyson, kevin)\nforall x (Reassail(x, tyson) -> not Reassail(x, kevin))\nforall x (Benficiate(x, kevin) and not Reassail(kevin, tyson) -> not Dighted(kevin))\nforall x (Dighted(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Reassail(x, gabe) and Hindmost(x) -> not Benficiate(x, tyson))\n\nReassail(ora, tyson)\n\nforall x (Promote(x, tyson) -> Reassail(x, tyson)) <- forall x (Promote(x, gabe) -> Promote(x, tyson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The elly vitaminize the issy. The elly caparison the clarice. The elly is foldaway. The elly is deweyan. The elly does not need the davine. The elly swing the clarice. The issy is starchlike. The issy swing the davine. The davine vitaminize the issy. The davine caparison the clarice. The davine is foldaway. The clarice vitaminize the davine. The clarice caparison the issy. The clarice does not eat the davine. The clarice is rubbery. The clarice swing the issy. If something vitaminize the davine then it is rubbery. If something swing the davine then it swing the issy. If something swing the issy then it caparison the issy. If the issy is rubbery then the issy swing the clarice. If something caparison the issy then it does not eat the clarice. If something vitaminize the clarice and the clarice does not eat the issy then the clarice is not deweyan. If something is deweyan then it is foldaway. If something caparison the davine and it is foldaway then it does not chase the issy. The issy does not chase the elly.", "logic": "\nVitaminize(elly, issy)\nCaparison(elly, clarice)\nFoldaway(elly)\nDeweyan(elly)\nnot Swing(elly, davine)\nSwing(elly, clarice)\nStarchlike(issy)\nSwing(issy, davine)\nVitaminize(davine, issy)\nCaparison(davine, clarice)\nFoldaway(davine)\nVitaminize(clarice, davine)\nCaparison(clarice, issy)\nnot Caparison(clarice, davine)\nRubbery(clarice)\nSwing(clarice, issy)\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, davine) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Swing(x, davine) -> Swing(x, issy))\nforall x (Swing(x, issy) -> Caparison(x, issy))\nRubbery(issy) -> Swing(issy, clarice)\nforall x (Caparison(x, issy) -> not Caparison(x, clarice))\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, clarice) and not Caparison(clarice, issy) -> not Deweyan(clarice))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Caparison(x, davine) and Foldaway(x) -> not Vitaminize(x, issy))\n\nnot Vitaminize(issy, elly)\n\nnot Vitaminize(issy, elly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The ede grave the shawn. The ede simplify the frederick. The ede is illicit. The ede is callable. The ede does not need the hillery. The ede personate the frederick. The shawn is mithraic. The shawn personate the hillery. The hillery grave the shawn. The hillery simplify the frederick. The hillery is illicit. The frederick grave the hillery. The frederick simplify the shawn. The frederick does not eat the hillery. The frederick is bodiless. The frederick personate the shawn. If something grave the hillery then it is bodiless. If something personate the hillery then it personate the shawn. If something personate the shawn then it simplify the shawn. If the shawn is bodiless then the shawn personate the frederick. If something simplify the shawn then it does not eat the frederick. If something grave the frederick and the frederick does not eat the shawn then the frederick is not callable. If something is callable then it is illicit. If something simplify the hillery and it is illicit then it does not chase the shawn. The frederick personate the frederick.", "logic": "\nGrave(ede, shawn)\nSimplify(ede, frederick)\nIllicit(ede)\nCallable(ede)\nnot Personate(ede, hillery)\nPersonate(ede, frederick)\nMithraic(shawn)\nPersonate(shawn, hillery)\nGrave(hillery, shawn)\nSimplify(hillery, frederick)\nIllicit(hillery)\nGrave(frederick, hillery)\nSimplify(frederick, shawn)\nnot Simplify(frederick, hillery)\nBodiless(frederick)\nPersonate(frederick, shawn)\nforall x (Grave(x, hillery) -> Bodiless(x))\nforall x (Personate(x, hillery) -> Personate(x, shawn))\nforall x (Personate(x, shawn) -> Simplify(x, shawn))\nBodiless(shawn) -> Personate(shawn, frederick)\nforall x (Simplify(x, shawn) -> not Simplify(x, frederick))\nforall x (Grave(x, frederick) and not Simplify(frederick, shawn) -> not Callable(frederick))\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Illicit(x))\nforall x (Simplify(x, hillery) and Illicit(x) -> not Grave(x, shawn))\n\nPersonate(frederick, frederick)\n\nPersonate(frederick, frederick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The kathi postdate the shara. The kathi partner the ilyssa. The kathi is xlviii. The kathi is ridiculous. The kathi does not need the chad. The kathi sell the ilyssa. The shara is choric. The shara sell the chad. The chad postdate the shara. The chad partner the ilyssa. The chad is xlviii. The ilyssa postdate the chad. The ilyssa partner the shara. The ilyssa does not eat the chad. The ilyssa is forgivable. The ilyssa sell the shara. If something postdate the chad then it is forgivable. If something sell the chad then it sell the shara. If something sell the shara then it partner the shara. If the shara is forgivable then the shara sell the ilyssa. If something partner the shara then it does not eat the ilyssa. If something postdate the ilyssa and the ilyssa does not eat the shara then the ilyssa is not ridiculous. If something is ridiculous then it is xlviii. If something partner the chad and it is xlviii then it does not chase the shara. The shara does not eat the chad.", "logic": "\nPostdate(kathi, shara)\nPartner(kathi, ilyssa)\nXlviii(kathi)\nRidiculous(kathi)\nnot Sell(kathi, chad)\nSell(kathi, ilyssa)\nChoric(shara)\nSell(shara, chad)\nPostdate(chad, shara)\nPartner(chad, ilyssa)\nXlviii(chad)\nPostdate(ilyssa, chad)\nPartner(ilyssa, shara)\nnot Partner(ilyssa, chad)\nForgivable(ilyssa)\nSell(ilyssa, shara)\nforall x (Postdate(x, chad) -> Forgivable(x))\nforall x (Sell(x, chad) -> Sell(x, shara))\nforall x (Sell(x, shara) -> Partner(x, shara))\nForgivable(shara) -> Sell(shara, ilyssa)\nforall x (Partner(x, shara) -> not Partner(x, ilyssa))\nforall x (Postdate(x, ilyssa) and not Partner(ilyssa, shara) -> not Ridiculous(ilyssa))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Xlviii(x))\nforall x (Partner(x, chad) and Xlviii(x) -> not Postdate(x, shara))\n\nnot Partner(shara, chad)\n\nnot Partner(shara, chad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The frederica mulch the cynthie. The frederica oxidize the paton. The frederica is underwater. The frederica is unmined. The frederica does not need the marigold. The frederica bewilder the paton. The cynthie is restful. The cynthie bewilder the marigold. The marigold mulch the cynthie. The marigold oxidize the paton. The marigold is underwater. The paton mulch the marigold. The paton oxidize the cynthie. The paton does not eat the marigold. The paton is smashed. The paton bewilder the cynthie. If something mulch the marigold then it is smashed. If something bewilder the marigold then it bewilder the cynthie. If something bewilder the cynthie then it oxidize the cynthie. If the cynthie is smashed then the cynthie bewilder the paton. If something oxidize the cynthie then it does not eat the paton. If something mulch the paton and the paton does not eat the cynthie then the paton is not unmined. If something is unmined then it is underwater. If something oxidize the marigold and it is underwater then it does not chase the cynthie. The frederica oxidize the frederica.", "logic": "\nMulch(frederica, cynthie)\nOxidize(frederica, paton)\nUnderwater(frederica)\nUnmined(frederica)\nnot Bewilder(frederica, marigold)\nBewilder(frederica, paton)\nRestful(cynthie)\nBewilder(cynthie, marigold)\nMulch(marigold, cynthie)\nOxidize(marigold, paton)\nUnderwater(marigold)\nMulch(paton, marigold)\nOxidize(paton, cynthie)\nnot Oxidize(paton, marigold)\nSmashed(paton)\nBewilder(paton, cynthie)\nforall x (Mulch(x, marigold) -> Smashed(x))\nforall x (Bewilder(x, marigold) -> Bewilder(x, cynthie))\nforall x (Bewilder(x, cynthie) -> Oxidize(x, cynthie))\nSmashed(cynthie) -> Bewilder(cynthie, paton)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, cynthie) -> not Oxidize(x, paton))\nforall x (Mulch(x, paton) and not Oxidize(paton, cynthie) -> not Unmined(paton))\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> Underwater(x))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, marigold) and Underwater(x) -> not Mulch(x, cynthie))\n\nOxidize(frederica, frederica)\n\nOxidize(frederica, frederica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The catie is solvable. The cabrina disgruntle the saudra. The saudra is prototypic. If something tenderize the cabrina then the cabrina tenderize the saudra. If the catie tenderize the saudra and the saudra tenderize the cabrina then the cabrina is particular. If something disgruntle the saudra then it tenderize the cabrina. If something tenderize the saudra then it is protrusive. If something disgruntle the catie and it tenderize the cabrina then it is prototypic. If something disgruntle the cabrina then the cabrina fluoridise the catie. The catie is solvable.", "logic": "\nSolvable(catie)\nDisgruntle(cabrina, saudra)\nPrototypic(saudra)\nforall x (Tenderize(x, cabrina) -> Tenderize(cabrina, saudra))\nTenderize(catie, saudra) and Tenderize(saudra, cabrina) -> Particular(cabrina)\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, saudra) -> Tenderize(x, cabrina))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, saudra) -> Protrusive(x))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, catie) and Tenderize(x, cabrina) -> Prototypic(x))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, cabrina) -> Fluoridise(cabrina, catie))\n\nSolvable(catie)\n\ntherefore Solvable(catie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The charlton is forbidden. The coretta maximise the annamari. The annamari is confutable. If something immix the coretta then the coretta immix the annamari. If the charlton immix the annamari and the annamari immix the coretta then the coretta is lacrimal. If something maximise the annamari then it immix the coretta. If something immix the annamari then it is gestural. If something maximise the charlton and it immix the coretta then it is confutable. If something maximise the coretta then the coretta caterwaul the charlton. The coretta does not like the annamari.", "logic": "\nForbidden(charlton)\nMaximise(coretta, annamari)\nConfutable(annamari)\nforall x (Immix(x, coretta) -> Immix(coretta, annamari))\nImmix(charlton, annamari) and Immix(annamari, coretta) -> Lacrimal(coretta)\nforall x (Maximise(x, annamari) -> Immix(x, coretta))\nforall x (Immix(x, annamari) -> Gestural(x))\nforall x (Maximise(x, charlton) and Immix(x, coretta) -> Confutable(x))\nforall x (Maximise(x, coretta) -> Caterwaul(coretta, charlton))\n\nnot Maximise(coretta, annamari)\n\ntherefore Maximise(coretta, annamari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The francyne is polynesian. The barris bedazzle the lil. The lil is whiskered. If something annotate the barris then the barris annotate the lil. If the francyne annotate the lil and the lil annotate the barris then the barris is literate. If something bedazzle the lil then it annotate the barris. If something annotate the lil then it is standpat. If something bedazzle the francyne and it annotate the barris then it is whiskered. If something bedazzle the barris then the barris expect the francyne. The barris annotate the barris.", "logic": "\nPolynesian(francyne)\nBedazzle(barris, lil)\nWhiskered(lil)\nforall x (Annotate(x, barris) -> Annotate(barris, lil))\nAnnotate(francyne, lil) and Annotate(lil, barris) -> Literate(barris)\nforall x (Bedazzle(x, lil) -> Annotate(x, barris))\nforall x (Annotate(x, lil) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Bedazzle(x, francyne) and Annotate(x, barris) -> Whiskered(x))\nforall x (Bedazzle(x, barris) -> Expect(barris, francyne))\n\nAnnotate(barris, barris)\n\nBedazzle(barris, lil) and forall x (Bedazzle(x, lil) -> Annotate(x, barris)) -> therefore Annotate(barris, barris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The riccardo is stygian. The deb revisit the sybille. The sybille is portuguese. If something groom the deb then the deb groom the sybille. If the riccardo groom the sybille and the sybille groom the deb then the deb is covariant. If something revisit the sybille then it groom the deb. If something groom the sybille then it is generative. If something revisit the riccardo and it groom the deb then it is portuguese. If something revisit the deb then the deb regularize the riccardo. The deb does not eat the deb.", "logic": "\nStygian(riccardo)\nRevisit(deb, sybille)\nPortuguese(sybille)\nforall x (Groom(x, deb) -> Groom(deb, sybille))\nGroom(riccardo, sybille) and Groom(sybille, deb) -> Covariant(deb)\nforall x (Revisit(x, sybille) -> Groom(x, deb))\nforall x (Groom(x, sybille) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Revisit(x, riccardo) and Groom(x, deb) -> Portuguese(x))\nforall x (Revisit(x, deb) -> Regularize(deb, riccardo))\n\nnot Groom(deb, deb)\n\nRevisit(deb, sybille) and forall x (Revisit(x, sybille) -> Groom(x, deb)) -> therefore Groom(deb, deb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The lyndsey is billion. The kermie ambulate the harlie. The harlie is balanced. If something bedevil the kermie then the kermie bedevil the harlie. If the lyndsey bedevil the harlie and the harlie bedevil the kermie then the kermie is edged. If something ambulate the harlie then it bedevil the kermie. If something bedevil the harlie then it is diabatic. If something ambulate the lyndsey and it bedevil the kermie then it is balanced. If something ambulate the kermie then the kermie vituperate the lyndsey. The kermie bedevil the harlie.", "logic": "\nBillion(lyndsey)\nAmbulate(kermie, harlie)\nBalanced(harlie)\nforall x (Bedevil(x, kermie) -> Bedevil(kermie, harlie))\nBedevil(lyndsey, harlie) and Bedevil(harlie, kermie) -> Edged(kermie)\nforall x (Ambulate(x, harlie) -> Bedevil(x, kermie))\nforall x (Bedevil(x, harlie) -> Diabatic(x))\nforall x (Ambulate(x, lyndsey) and Bedevil(x, kermie) -> Balanced(x))\nforall x (Ambulate(x, kermie) -> Vituperate(kermie, lyndsey))\n\nBedevil(kermie, harlie)\n\nAmbulate(kermie, harlie) and forall x (Ambulate(x, harlie) -> Bedevil(x, kermie)) -> therefore Bedevil(kermie, kermie) Bedevil(kermie, kermie) and forall x (Bedevil(x, kermie) -> Bedevil(kermie, harlie)) -> therefore Bedevil(kermie, harlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The trescha is handled. The marilyn exasperate the dorri. The dorri is slithery. If something boldface the marilyn then the marilyn boldface the dorri. If the trescha boldface the dorri and the dorri boldface the marilyn then the marilyn is sicilian. If something exasperate the dorri then it boldface the marilyn. If something boldface the dorri then it is jelled. If something exasperate the trescha and it boldface the marilyn then it is slithery. If something exasperate the marilyn then the marilyn disinfect the trescha. The marilyn does not eat the dorri.", "logic": "\nHandled(trescha)\nExasperate(marilyn, dorri)\nSlithery(dorri)\nforall x (Boldface(x, marilyn) -> Boldface(marilyn, dorri))\nBoldface(trescha, dorri) and Boldface(dorri, marilyn) -> Sicilian(marilyn)\nforall x (Exasperate(x, dorri) -> Boldface(x, marilyn))\nforall x (Boldface(x, dorri) -> Jelled(x))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, trescha) and Boldface(x, marilyn) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, marilyn) -> Disinfect(marilyn, trescha))\n\nnot Boldface(marilyn, dorri)\n\nExasperate(marilyn, dorri) and forall x (Exasperate(x, dorri) -> Boldface(x, marilyn)) -> therefore Boldface(marilyn, marilyn) Boldface(marilyn, marilyn) and forall x (Boldface(x, marilyn) -> Boldface(marilyn, dorri)) -> therefore Boldface(marilyn, dorri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The sharra is disliked. The zeb shield the loralyn. The loralyn is lubricious. If something slurp the zeb then the zeb slurp the loralyn. If the sharra slurp the loralyn and the loralyn slurp the zeb then the zeb is gone. If something shield the loralyn then it slurp the zeb. If something slurp the loralyn then it is loveable. If something shield the sharra and it slurp the zeb then it is lubricious. If something shield the zeb then the zeb gravel the sharra. The zeb is loveable.", "logic": "\nDisliked(sharra)\nShield(zeb, loralyn)\nLubricious(loralyn)\nforall x (Slurp(x, zeb) -> Slurp(zeb, loralyn))\nSlurp(sharra, loralyn) and Slurp(loralyn, zeb) -> Gone(zeb)\nforall x (Shield(x, loralyn) -> Slurp(x, zeb))\nforall x (Slurp(x, loralyn) -> Loveable(x))\nforall x (Shield(x, sharra) and Slurp(x, zeb) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Shield(x, zeb) -> Gravel(zeb, sharra))\n\nLoveable(zeb)\n\nShield(zeb, loralyn) and forall x (Shield(x, loralyn) -> Slurp(x, zeb)) -> therefore Slurp(zeb, zeb) Slurp(zeb, zeb) and forall x (Slurp(x, zeb) -> Slurp(zeb, loralyn)) -> therefore Slurp(zeb, loralyn) Slurp(zeb, loralyn) and forall x (Slurp(x, loralyn) -> Loveable(x)) -> therefore Loveable(zeb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The ave is gradable. The melodee farrow the kevina. The kevina is unimpaired. If something keen the melodee then the melodee keen the kevina. If the ave keen the kevina and the kevina keen the melodee then the melodee is shodden. If something farrow the kevina then it keen the melodee. If something keen the kevina then it is fulgent. If something farrow the ave and it keen the melodee then it is unimpaired. If something farrow the melodee then the melodee acetify the ave. The melodee is not fulgent.", "logic": "\nGradable(ave)\nFarrow(melodee, kevina)\nUnimpaired(kevina)\nforall x (Keen(x, melodee) -> Keen(melodee, kevina))\nKeen(ave, kevina) and Keen(kevina, melodee) -> Shodden(melodee)\nforall x (Farrow(x, kevina) -> Keen(x, melodee))\nforall x (Keen(x, kevina) -> Fulgent(x))\nforall x (Farrow(x, ave) and Keen(x, melodee) -> Unimpaired(x))\nforall x (Farrow(x, melodee) -> Acetify(melodee, ave))\n\nnot Fulgent(melodee)\n\nFarrow(melodee, kevina) and forall x (Farrow(x, kevina) -> Keen(x, melodee)) -> therefore Keen(melodee, melodee) Keen(melodee, melodee) and forall x (Keen(x, melodee) -> Keen(melodee, kevina)) -> therefore Keen(melodee, kevina) Keen(melodee, kevina) and forall x (Keen(x, kevina) -> Fulgent(x)) -> therefore Fulgent(melodee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The merrile is nonplused. The morna fructify the rhiamon. The rhiamon is capable. If something fleet the morna then the morna fleet the rhiamon. If the merrile fleet the rhiamon and the rhiamon fleet the morna then the morna is breakable. If something fructify the rhiamon then it fleet the morna. If something fleet the rhiamon then it is flickering. If something fructify the merrile and it fleet the morna then it is capable. If something fructify the morna then the morna cheek the merrile. The merrile does not eat the morna.", "logic": "\nNonplused(merrile)\nFructify(morna, rhiamon)\nCapable(rhiamon)\nforall x (Fleet(x, morna) -> Fleet(morna, rhiamon))\nFleet(merrile, rhiamon) and Fleet(rhiamon, morna) -> Breakable(morna)\nforall x (Fructify(x, rhiamon) -> Fleet(x, morna))\nforall x (Fleet(x, rhiamon) -> Flickering(x))\nforall x (Fructify(x, merrile) and Fleet(x, morna) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Fructify(x, morna) -> Cheek(morna, merrile))\n\nnot Fleet(merrile, morna)\n\nforall x (Fructify(x, rhiamon) -> Fleet(x, morna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The krissie is calendric. The skipper starboard the lisandra. The lisandra is unassigned. If something organize the skipper then the skipper organize the lisandra. If the krissie organize the lisandra and the lisandra organize the skipper then the skipper is coccal. If something starboard the lisandra then it organize the skipper. If something organize the lisandra then it is childish. If something starboard the krissie and it organize the skipper then it is unassigned. If something starboard the skipper then the skipper mapquest the krissie. The skipper mapquest the krissie.", "logic": "\nCalendric(krissie)\nStarboard(skipper, lisandra)\nUnassigned(lisandra)\nforall x (Organize(x, skipper) -> Organize(skipper, lisandra))\nOrganize(krissie, lisandra) and Organize(lisandra, skipper) -> Coccal(skipper)\nforall x (Starboard(x, lisandra) -> Organize(x, skipper))\nforall x (Organize(x, lisandra) -> Childish(x))\nforall x (Starboard(x, krissie) and Organize(x, skipper) -> Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Starboard(x, skipper) -> Mapquest(skipper, krissie))\n\nMapquest(skipper, krissie)\n\nforall x (Starboard(x, skipper) -> Mapquest(skipper, krissie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The thacher is monotonic. The baily hill the kenna. The kenna is nodular. If something tail the baily then the baily tail the kenna. If the thacher tail the kenna and the kenna tail the baily then the baily is encased. If something hill the kenna then it tail the baily. If something tail the kenna then it is tempting. If something hill the thacher and it tail the baily then it is nodular. If something hill the baily then the baily slander the thacher. The thacher is not tempting.", "logic": "\nMonotonic(thacher)\nHill(baily, kenna)\nNodular(kenna)\nforall x (Tail(x, baily) -> Tail(baily, kenna))\nTail(thacher, kenna) and Tail(kenna, baily) -> Encased(baily)\nforall x (Hill(x, kenna) -> Tail(x, baily))\nforall x (Tail(x, kenna) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Hill(x, thacher) and Tail(x, baily) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Hill(x, baily) -> Slander(baily, thacher))\n\nnot Tempting(thacher)\n\nforall x (Tail(x, kenna) -> Tempting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The leilah is world. The sascha flurry the tiffi. The tiffi is unsaleable. If something dangle the sascha then the sascha dangle the tiffi. If the leilah dangle the tiffi and the tiffi dangle the sascha then the sascha is earthbound. If something flurry the tiffi then it dangle the sascha. If something dangle the tiffi then it is ahead. If something flurry the leilah and it dangle the sascha then it is unsaleable. If something flurry the sascha then the sascha effeminise the leilah. The sascha is earthbound.", "logic": "\nWorld(leilah)\nFlurry(sascha, tiffi)\nUnsaleable(tiffi)\nforall x (Dangle(x, sascha) -> Dangle(sascha, tiffi))\nDangle(leilah, tiffi) and Dangle(tiffi, sascha) -> Earthbound(sascha)\nforall x (Flurry(x, tiffi) -> Dangle(x, sascha))\nforall x (Dangle(x, tiffi) -> Ahead(x))\nforall x (Flurry(x, leilah) and Dangle(x, sascha) -> Unsaleable(x))\nforall x (Flurry(x, sascha) -> Effeminise(sascha, leilah))\n\nEarthbound(sascha)\n\nDangle(leilah, tiffi) and Dangle(tiffi, sascha) -> Earthbound(sascha) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The erina is undamaged. The claretta relearn the selle. The selle is iridic. If something arborize the claretta then the claretta arborize the selle. If the erina arborize the selle and the selle arborize the claretta then the claretta is ductless. If something relearn the selle then it arborize the claretta. If something arborize the selle then it is antiblack. If something relearn the erina and it arborize the claretta then it is iridic. If something relearn the claretta then the claretta skedaddle the erina. The erina does not like the claretta.", "logic": "\nUndamaged(erina)\nRelearn(claretta, selle)\nIridic(selle)\nforall x (Arborize(x, claretta) -> Arborize(claretta, selle))\nArborize(erina, selle) and Arborize(selle, claretta) -> Ductless(claretta)\nforall x (Relearn(x, selle) -> Arborize(x, claretta))\nforall x (Arborize(x, selle) -> Antiblack(x))\nforall x (Relearn(x, erina) and Arborize(x, claretta) -> Iridic(x))\nforall x (Relearn(x, claretta) -> Skedaddle(claretta, erina))\n\nnot Relearn(erina, claretta)\n\nnot Relearn(erina, claretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The virginia is pappose. The donielle betroth the abdel. The abdel is caffeinic. If something plod the donielle then the donielle plod the abdel. If the virginia plod the abdel and the abdel plod the donielle then the donielle is azotemic. If something betroth the abdel then it plod the donielle. If something plod the abdel then it is dislikable. If something betroth the virginia and it plod the donielle then it is caffeinic. If something betroth the donielle then the donielle crochet the virginia. The abdel is kind.", "logic": "\nPappose(virginia)\nBetroth(donielle, abdel)\nCaffeinic(abdel)\nforall x (Plod(x, donielle) -> Plod(donielle, abdel))\nPlod(virginia, abdel) and Plod(abdel, donielle) -> Azotemic(donielle)\nforall x (Betroth(x, abdel) -> Plod(x, donielle))\nforall x (Plod(x, abdel) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Betroth(x, virginia) and Plod(x, donielle) -> Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Betroth(x, donielle) -> Crochet(donielle, virginia))\n\nKind(abdel)\n\nKind(abdel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The gershom is sprawly. The celene gutter the madeleine. The madeleine is ventilated. If something sheer the celene then the celene sheer the madeleine. If the gershom sheer the madeleine and the madeleine sheer the celene then the celene is threefold. If something gutter the madeleine then it sheer the celene. If something sheer the madeleine then it is contagious. If something gutter the gershom and it sheer the celene then it is ventilated. If something gutter the celene then the celene skew the gershom. The celene does not like the celene.", "logic": "\nSprawly(gershom)\nGutter(celene, madeleine)\nVentilated(madeleine)\nforall x (Sheer(x, celene) -> Sheer(celene, madeleine))\nSheer(gershom, madeleine) and Sheer(madeleine, celene) -> Threefold(celene)\nforall x (Gutter(x, madeleine) -> Sheer(x, celene))\nforall x (Sheer(x, madeleine) -> Contagious(x))\nforall x (Gutter(x, gershom) and Sheer(x, celene) -> Ventilated(x))\nforall x (Gutter(x, celene) -> Skew(celene, gershom))\n\nnot Gutter(celene, celene)\n\nnot Gutter(celene, celene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The ebba is unkeyed. The darleen enter the allianora. The allianora is arthurian. If something exfoliate the darleen then the darleen exfoliate the allianora. If the ebba exfoliate the allianora and the allianora exfoliate the darleen then the darleen is coiling. If something enter the allianora then it exfoliate the darleen. If something exfoliate the allianora then it is monoclonal. If something enter the ebba and it exfoliate the darleen then it is arthurian. If something enter the darleen then the darleen grass the ebba. The ebba is coiling.", "logic": "\nUnkeyed(ebba)\nEnter(darleen, allianora)\nArthurian(allianora)\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, darleen) -> Exfoliate(darleen, allianora))\nExfoliate(ebba, allianora) and Exfoliate(allianora, darleen) -> Coiling(darleen)\nforall x (Enter(x, allianora) -> Exfoliate(x, darleen))\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, allianora) -> Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Enter(x, ebba) and Exfoliate(x, darleen) -> Arthurian(x))\nforall x (Enter(x, darleen) -> Grass(darleen, ebba))\n\nCoiling(ebba)\n\nCoiling(ebba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The kee dote the adaline. The kee is ammoniacal. The kee prang the rea. The rea is revertible. The rea grudge the adaline. The rea prang the kee. The adaline prang the rea. If something is revertible then it dote the adaline. If something prang the rea and it grudge the kee then the rea grudge the adaline. If the kee prang the rea and the kee dote the rea then the rea dote the adaline. If the rea dote the kee then the kee dote the rea. If something prang the kee and it dote the adaline then the adaline dote the rea. If something is rhymeless then it dote the kee. If something grudge the rea then it prang the adaline. If something dote the adaline and it grudge the adaline then it grudge the rea. The rea prang the kee.", "logic": "\nDote(kee, adaline)\nAmmoniacal(kee)\nPrang(kee, rea)\nRevertible(rea)\nGrudge(rea, adaline)\nPrang(rea, kee)\nPrang(adaline, rea)\nforall x (Revertible(x) -> Dote(x, adaline))\nforall x (Prang(x, rea) and Grudge(x, kee) -> Grudge(rea, adaline))\nPrang(kee, rea) and Dote(kee, rea) -> Dote(rea, adaline)\nDote(rea, kee) -> Dote(kee, rea)\nforall x (Prang(x, kee) and Dote(x, adaline) -> Dote(adaline, rea))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Dote(x, kee))\nforall x (Grudge(x, rea) -> Prang(x, adaline))\nforall x (Dote(x, adaline) and Grudge(x, adaline) -> Grudge(x, rea))\n\nPrang(rea, kee)\n\ntherefore Prang(rea, kee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The shimon miscarry the ronnie. The shimon is bladdery. The shimon howl the barbette. The barbette is categoric. The barbette barbarize the ronnie. The barbette howl the shimon. The ronnie howl the barbette. If something is categoric then it miscarry the ronnie. If something howl the barbette and it barbarize the shimon then the barbette barbarize the ronnie. If the shimon howl the barbette and the shimon miscarry the barbette then the barbette miscarry the ronnie. If the barbette miscarry the shimon then the shimon miscarry the barbette. If something howl the shimon and it miscarry the ronnie then the ronnie miscarry the barbette. If something is chinchy then it miscarry the shimon. If something barbarize the barbette then it howl the ronnie. If something miscarry the ronnie and it barbarize the ronnie then it barbarize the barbette. The shimon is not bladdery.", "logic": "\nMiscarry(shimon, ronnie)\nBladdery(shimon)\nHowl(shimon, barbette)\nCategoric(barbette)\nBarbarize(barbette, ronnie)\nHowl(barbette, shimon)\nHowl(ronnie, barbette)\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Miscarry(x, ronnie))\nforall x (Howl(x, barbette) and Barbarize(x, shimon) -> Barbarize(barbette, ronnie))\nHowl(shimon, barbette) and Miscarry(shimon, barbette) -> Miscarry(barbette, ronnie)\nMiscarry(barbette, shimon) -> Miscarry(shimon, barbette)\nforall x (Howl(x, shimon) and Miscarry(x, ronnie) -> Miscarry(ronnie, barbette))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Miscarry(x, shimon))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, barbette) -> Howl(x, ronnie))\nforall x (Miscarry(x, ronnie) and Barbarize(x, ronnie) -> Barbarize(x, barbette))\n\nnot Bladdery(shimon)\n\ntherefore Bladdery(shimon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The june undertake the anselm. The june is subscribed. The june bedamn the sibley. The sibley is neoliberal. The sibley implant the anselm. The sibley bedamn the june. The anselm bedamn the sibley. If something is neoliberal then it undertake the anselm. If something bedamn the sibley and it implant the june then the sibley implant the anselm. If the june bedamn the sibley and the june undertake the sibley then the sibley undertake the anselm. If the sibley undertake the june then the june undertake the sibley. If something bedamn the june and it undertake the anselm then the anselm undertake the sibley. If something is mucky then it undertake the june. If something implant the sibley then it bedamn the anselm. If something undertake the anselm and it implant the anselm then it implant the sibley. The sibley undertake the anselm.", "logic": "\nUndertake(june, anselm)\nSubscribed(june)\nBedamn(june, sibley)\nNeoliberal(sibley)\nImplant(sibley, anselm)\nBedamn(sibley, june)\nBedamn(anselm, sibley)\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Undertake(x, anselm))\nforall x (Bedamn(x, sibley) and Implant(x, june) -> Implant(sibley, anselm))\nBedamn(june, sibley) and Undertake(june, sibley) -> Undertake(sibley, anselm)\nUndertake(sibley, june) -> Undertake(june, sibley)\nforall x (Bedamn(x, june) and Undertake(x, anselm) -> Undertake(anselm, sibley))\nforall x (Mucky(x) -> Undertake(x, june))\nforall x (Implant(x, sibley) -> Bedamn(x, anselm))\nforall x (Undertake(x, anselm) and Implant(x, anselm) -> Implant(x, sibley))\n\nUndertake(sibley, anselm)\n\nNeoliberal(sibley) and forall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Undertake(x, anselm)) -> therefore Undertake(sibley, anselm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The rhiamon antagonise the anett. The rhiamon is stormy. The rhiamon dandify the ibrahim. The ibrahim is blowzy. The ibrahim distance the anett. The ibrahim dandify the rhiamon. The anett dandify the ibrahim. If something is blowzy then it antagonise the anett. If something dandify the ibrahim and it distance the rhiamon then the ibrahim distance the anett. If the rhiamon dandify the ibrahim and the rhiamon antagonise the ibrahim then the ibrahim antagonise the anett. If the ibrahim antagonise the rhiamon then the rhiamon antagonise the ibrahim. If something dandify the rhiamon and it antagonise the anett then the anett antagonise the ibrahim. If something is volumetric then it antagonise the rhiamon. If something distance the ibrahim then it dandify the anett. If something antagonise the anett and it distance the anett then it distance the ibrahim. The ibrahim does not chase the anett.", "logic": "\nAntagonise(rhiamon, anett)\nStormy(rhiamon)\nDandify(rhiamon, ibrahim)\nBlowzy(ibrahim)\nDistance(ibrahim, anett)\nDandify(ibrahim, rhiamon)\nDandify(anett, ibrahim)\nforall x (Blowzy(x) -> Antagonise(x, anett))\nforall x (Dandify(x, ibrahim) and Distance(x, rhiamon) -> Distance(ibrahim, anett))\nDandify(rhiamon, ibrahim) and Antagonise(rhiamon, ibrahim) -> Antagonise(ibrahim, anett)\nAntagonise(ibrahim, rhiamon) -> Antagonise(rhiamon, ibrahim)\nforall x (Dandify(x, rhiamon) and Antagonise(x, anett) -> Antagonise(anett, ibrahim))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) -> Antagonise(x, rhiamon))\nforall x (Distance(x, ibrahim) -> Dandify(x, anett))\nforall x (Antagonise(x, anett) and Distance(x, anett) -> Distance(x, ibrahim))\n\nnot Antagonise(ibrahim, anett)\n\nBlowzy(ibrahim) and forall x (Blowzy(x) -> Antagonise(x, anett)) -> therefore Antagonise(ibrahim, anett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The gianina polymerize the thatcher. The gianina is symbolic. The gianina drag the steve. The steve is virile. The steve horse the thatcher. The steve drag the gianina. The thatcher drag the steve. If something is virile then it polymerize the thatcher. If something drag the steve and it horse the gianina then the steve horse the thatcher. If the gianina drag the steve and the gianina polymerize the steve then the steve polymerize the thatcher. If the steve polymerize the gianina then the gianina polymerize the steve. If something drag the gianina and it polymerize the thatcher then the thatcher polymerize the steve. If something is frictional then it polymerize the gianina. If something horse the steve then it drag the thatcher. If something polymerize the thatcher and it horse the thatcher then it horse the steve. The thatcher polymerize the steve.", "logic": "\nPolymerize(gianina, thatcher)\nSymbolic(gianina)\nDrag(gianina, steve)\nVirile(steve)\nHorse(steve, thatcher)\nDrag(steve, gianina)\nDrag(thatcher, steve)\nforall x (Virile(x) -> Polymerize(x, thatcher))\nforall x (Drag(x, steve) and Horse(x, gianina) -> Horse(steve, thatcher))\nDrag(gianina, steve) and Polymerize(gianina, steve) -> Polymerize(steve, thatcher)\nPolymerize(steve, gianina) -> Polymerize(gianina, steve)\nforall x (Drag(x, gianina) and Polymerize(x, thatcher) -> Polymerize(thatcher, steve))\nforall x (Frictional(x) -> Polymerize(x, gianina))\nforall x (Horse(x, steve) -> Drag(x, thatcher))\nforall x (Polymerize(x, thatcher) and Horse(x, thatcher) -> Horse(x, steve))\n\nPolymerize(thatcher, steve)\n\nVirile(steve) and forall x (Virile(x) -> Polymerize(x, thatcher)) -> therefore Polymerize(steve, thatcher) Drag(steve, gianina) and Polymerize(steve, thatcher) and forall x (Drag(x, gianina) and Polymerize(x, thatcher) -> Polymerize(thatcher, steve)) -> therefore Polymerize(thatcher, steve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The mayor covenant the michal. The mayor is flyblown. The mayor subsidize the rayshell. The rayshell is rural. The rayshell summarise the michal. The rayshell subsidize the mayor. The michal subsidize the rayshell. If something is rural then it covenant the michal. If something subsidize the rayshell and it summarise the mayor then the rayshell summarise the michal. If the mayor subsidize the rayshell and the mayor covenant the rayshell then the rayshell covenant the michal. If the rayshell covenant the mayor then the mayor covenant the rayshell. If something subsidize the mayor and it covenant the michal then the michal covenant the rayshell. If something is disheveled then it covenant the mayor. If something summarise the rayshell then it subsidize the michal. If something covenant the michal and it summarise the michal then it summarise the rayshell. The michal does not chase the rayshell.", "logic": "\nCovenant(mayor, michal)\nFlyblown(mayor)\nSubsidize(mayor, rayshell)\nRural(rayshell)\nSummarise(rayshell, michal)\nSubsidize(rayshell, mayor)\nSubsidize(michal, rayshell)\nforall x (Rural(x) -> Covenant(x, michal))\nforall x (Subsidize(x, rayshell) and Summarise(x, mayor) -> Summarise(rayshell, michal))\nSubsidize(mayor, rayshell) and Covenant(mayor, rayshell) -> Covenant(rayshell, michal)\nCovenant(rayshell, mayor) -> Covenant(mayor, rayshell)\nforall x (Subsidize(x, mayor) and Covenant(x, michal) -> Covenant(michal, rayshell))\nforall x (Disheveled(x) -> Covenant(x, mayor))\nforall x (Summarise(x, rayshell) -> Subsidize(x, michal))\nforall x (Covenant(x, michal) and Summarise(x, michal) -> Summarise(x, rayshell))\n\nnot Covenant(michal, rayshell)\n\nRural(rayshell) and forall x (Rural(x) -> Covenant(x, michal)) -> therefore Covenant(rayshell, michal) Subsidize(rayshell, mayor) and Covenant(rayshell, michal) and forall x (Subsidize(x, mayor) and Covenant(x, michal) -> Covenant(michal, rayshell)) -> therefore Covenant(michal, rayshell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The lishe ridge the errol. The lishe is straying. The lishe yarn the kacey. The kacey is realized. The kacey assibilate the errol. The kacey yarn the lishe. The errol yarn the kacey. If something is realized then it ridge the errol. If something yarn the kacey and it assibilate the lishe then the kacey assibilate the errol. If the lishe yarn the kacey and the lishe ridge the kacey then the kacey ridge the errol. If the kacey ridge the lishe then the lishe ridge the kacey. If something yarn the lishe and it ridge the errol then the errol ridge the kacey. If something is alpine then it ridge the lishe. If something assibilate the kacey then it yarn the errol. If something ridge the errol and it assibilate the errol then it assibilate the kacey. The kacey yarn the errol.", "logic": "\nRidge(lishe, errol)\nStraying(lishe)\nYarn(lishe, kacey)\nRealized(kacey)\nAssibilate(kacey, errol)\nYarn(kacey, lishe)\nYarn(errol, kacey)\nforall x (Realized(x) -> Ridge(x, errol))\nforall x (Yarn(x, kacey) and Assibilate(x, lishe) -> Assibilate(kacey, errol))\nYarn(lishe, kacey) and Ridge(lishe, kacey) -> Ridge(kacey, errol)\nRidge(kacey, lishe) -> Ridge(lishe, kacey)\nforall x (Yarn(x, lishe) and Ridge(x, errol) -> Ridge(errol, kacey))\nforall x (Alpine(x) -> Ridge(x, lishe))\nforall x (Assibilate(x, kacey) -> Yarn(x, errol))\nforall x (Ridge(x, errol) and Assibilate(x, errol) -> Assibilate(x, kacey))\n\nYarn(kacey, errol)\n\nRealized(kacey) and forall x (Realized(x) -> Ridge(x, errol)) -> therefore Ridge(kacey, errol) Ridge(kacey, errol) and Assibilate(kacey, errol) and forall x (Ridge(x, errol) and Assibilate(x, errol) -> Assibilate(x, kacey)) -> therefore Assibilate(kacey, kacey) Assibilate(kacey, kacey) and forall x (Assibilate(x, kacey) -> Yarn(x, errol)) -> therefore Yarn(kacey, errol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The pail citrate the davina. The pail is attired. The pail effeminize the austine. The austine is aflame. The austine devalue the davina. The austine effeminize the pail. The davina effeminize the austine. If something is aflame then it citrate the davina. If something effeminize the austine and it devalue the pail then the austine devalue the davina. If the pail effeminize the austine and the pail citrate the austine then the austine citrate the davina. If the austine citrate the pail then the pail citrate the austine. If something effeminize the pail and it citrate the davina then the davina citrate the austine. If something is beardless then it citrate the pail. If something devalue the austine then it effeminize the davina. If something citrate the davina and it devalue the davina then it devalue the austine. The austine does not see the davina.", "logic": "\nCitrate(pail, davina)\nAttired(pail)\nEffeminize(pail, austine)\nAflame(austine)\nDevalue(austine, davina)\nEffeminize(austine, pail)\nEffeminize(davina, austine)\nforall x (Aflame(x) -> Citrate(x, davina))\nforall x (Effeminize(x, austine) and Devalue(x, pail) -> Devalue(austine, davina))\nEffeminize(pail, austine) and Citrate(pail, austine) -> Citrate(austine, davina)\nCitrate(austine, pail) -> Citrate(pail, austine)\nforall x (Effeminize(x, pail) and Citrate(x, davina) -> Citrate(davina, austine))\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Citrate(x, pail))\nforall x (Devalue(x, austine) -> Effeminize(x, davina))\nforall x (Citrate(x, davina) and Devalue(x, davina) -> Devalue(x, austine))\n\nnot Effeminize(austine, davina)\n\nAflame(austine) and forall x (Aflame(x) -> Citrate(x, davina)) -> therefore Citrate(austine, davina) Citrate(austine, davina) and Devalue(austine, davina) and forall x (Citrate(x, davina) and Devalue(x, davina) -> Devalue(x, austine)) -> therefore Devalue(austine, austine) Devalue(austine, austine) and forall x (Devalue(x, austine) -> Effeminize(x, davina)) -> therefore Effeminize(austine, davina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The lynn grace the welbie. The lynn is monestrous. The lynn schematize the pat. The pat is woolly. The pat metallize the welbie. The pat schematize the lynn. The welbie schematize the pat. If something is woolly then it grace the welbie. If something schematize the pat and it metallize the lynn then the pat metallize the welbie. If the lynn schematize the pat and the lynn grace the pat then the pat grace the welbie. If the pat grace the lynn then the lynn grace the pat. If something schematize the lynn and it grace the welbie then the welbie grace the pat. If something is molar then it grace the lynn. If something metallize the pat then it schematize the welbie. If something grace the welbie and it metallize the welbie then it metallize the pat. The welbie does not see the welbie.", "logic": "\nGrace(lynn, welbie)\nMonestrous(lynn)\nSchematize(lynn, pat)\nWoolly(pat)\nMetallize(pat, welbie)\nSchematize(pat, lynn)\nSchematize(welbie, pat)\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Grace(x, welbie))\nforall x (Schematize(x, pat) and Metallize(x, lynn) -> Metallize(pat, welbie))\nSchematize(lynn, pat) and Grace(lynn, pat) -> Grace(pat, welbie)\nGrace(pat, lynn) -> Grace(lynn, pat)\nforall x (Schematize(x, lynn) and Grace(x, welbie) -> Grace(welbie, pat))\nforall x (Molar(x) -> Grace(x, lynn))\nforall x (Metallize(x, pat) -> Schematize(x, welbie))\nforall x (Grace(x, welbie) and Metallize(x, welbie) -> Metallize(x, pat))\n\nnot Schematize(welbie, welbie)\n\nforall x (Metallize(x, pat) -> Schematize(x, welbie)) <- forall x (Grace(x, welbie) and Metallize(x, welbie) -> Metallize(x, pat)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The coreen chant the glyn. The coreen is conic. The coreen wank the abdel. The abdel is mortgaged. The abdel deliquesce the glyn. The abdel wank the coreen. The glyn wank the abdel. If something is mortgaged then it chant the glyn. If something wank the abdel and it deliquesce the coreen then the abdel deliquesce the glyn. If the coreen wank the abdel and the coreen chant the abdel then the abdel chant the glyn. If the abdel chant the coreen then the coreen chant the abdel. If something wank the coreen and it chant the glyn then the glyn chant the abdel. If something is shorn then it chant the coreen. If something deliquesce the abdel then it wank the glyn. If something chant the glyn and it deliquesce the glyn then it deliquesce the abdel. The coreen chant the abdel.", "logic": "\nChant(coreen, glyn)\nConic(coreen)\nWank(coreen, abdel)\nMortgaged(abdel)\nDeliquesce(abdel, glyn)\nWank(abdel, coreen)\nWank(glyn, abdel)\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Chant(x, glyn))\nforall x (Wank(x, abdel) and Deliquesce(x, coreen) -> Deliquesce(abdel, glyn))\nWank(coreen, abdel) and Chant(coreen, abdel) -> Chant(abdel, glyn)\nChant(abdel, coreen) -> Chant(coreen, abdel)\nforall x (Wank(x, coreen) and Chant(x, glyn) -> Chant(glyn, abdel))\nforall x (Shorn(x) -> Chant(x, coreen))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, abdel) -> Wank(x, glyn))\nforall x (Chant(x, glyn) and Deliquesce(x, glyn) -> Deliquesce(x, abdel))\n\nChant(coreen, abdel)\n\nChant(abdel, coreen) -> Chant(coreen, abdel) <- forall x (Shorn(x) -> Chant(x, coreen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The reece tempt the gloriane. The reece is actuarial. The reece illegalize the arleyne. The arleyne is jiggered. The arleyne explain the gloriane. The arleyne illegalize the reece. The gloriane illegalize the arleyne. If something is jiggered then it tempt the gloriane. If something illegalize the arleyne and it explain the reece then the arleyne explain the gloriane. If the reece illegalize the arleyne and the reece tempt the arleyne then the arleyne tempt the gloriane. If the arleyne tempt the reece then the reece tempt the arleyne. If something illegalize the reece and it tempt the gloriane then the gloriane tempt the arleyne. If something is wired then it tempt the reece. If something explain the arleyne then it illegalize the gloriane. If something tempt the gloriane and it explain the gloriane then it explain the arleyne. The reece does not chase the reece.", "logic": "\nTempt(reece, gloriane)\nActuarial(reece)\nIllegalize(reece, arleyne)\nJiggered(arleyne)\nExplain(arleyne, gloriane)\nIllegalize(arleyne, reece)\nIllegalize(gloriane, arleyne)\nforall x (Jiggered(x) -> Tempt(x, gloriane))\nforall x (Illegalize(x, arleyne) and Explain(x, reece) -> Explain(arleyne, gloriane))\nIllegalize(reece, arleyne) and Tempt(reece, arleyne) -> Tempt(arleyne, gloriane)\nTempt(arleyne, reece) -> Tempt(reece, arleyne)\nforall x (Illegalize(x, reece) and Tempt(x, gloriane) -> Tempt(gloriane, arleyne))\nforall x (Wired(x) -> Tempt(x, reece))\nforall x (Explain(x, arleyne) -> Illegalize(x, gloriane))\nforall x (Tempt(x, gloriane) and Explain(x, gloriane) -> Explain(x, arleyne))\n\nnot Tempt(reece, reece)\n\nforall x (Wired(x) -> Tempt(x, reece)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The dari pulverise the tasha. The dari is cheery. The dari rehearse the tito. The tito is dotty. The tito nauseate the tasha. The tito rehearse the dari. The tasha rehearse the tito. If something is dotty then it pulverise the tasha. If something rehearse the tito and it nauseate the dari then the tito nauseate the tasha. If the dari rehearse the tito and the dari pulverise the tito then the tito pulverise the tasha. If the tito pulverise the dari then the dari pulverise the tito. If something rehearse the dari and it pulverise the tasha then the tasha pulverise the tito. If something is methylated then it pulverise the dari. If something nauseate the tito then it rehearse the tasha. If something pulverise the tasha and it nauseate the tasha then it nauseate the tito. The dari rehearse the tasha.", "logic": "\nPulverise(dari, tasha)\nCheery(dari)\nRehearse(dari, tito)\nDotty(tito)\nNauseate(tito, tasha)\nRehearse(tito, dari)\nRehearse(tasha, tito)\nforall x (Dotty(x) -> Pulverise(x, tasha))\nforall x (Rehearse(x, tito) and Nauseate(x, dari) -> Nauseate(tito, tasha))\nRehearse(dari, tito) and Pulverise(dari, tito) -> Pulverise(tito, tasha)\nPulverise(tito, dari) -> Pulverise(dari, tito)\nforall x (Rehearse(x, dari) and Pulverise(x, tasha) -> Pulverise(tasha, tito))\nforall x (Methylated(x) -> Pulverise(x, dari))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, tito) -> Rehearse(x, tasha))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, tasha) and Nauseate(x, tasha) -> Nauseate(x, tito))\n\nRehearse(dari, tasha)\n\nforall x (Nauseate(x, tito) -> Rehearse(x, tasha)) <- forall x (Pulverise(x, tasha) and Nauseate(x, tasha) -> Nauseate(x, tito)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The priscilla reappraise the tomkin. The priscilla is gratis. The priscilla sneer the michaela. The michaela is stylised. The michaela polemicise the tomkin. The michaela sneer the priscilla. The tomkin sneer the michaela. If something is stylised then it reappraise the tomkin. If something sneer the michaela and it polemicise the priscilla then the michaela polemicise the tomkin. If the priscilla sneer the michaela and the priscilla reappraise the michaela then the michaela reappraise the tomkin. If the michaela reappraise the priscilla then the priscilla reappraise the michaela. If something sneer the priscilla and it reappraise the tomkin then the tomkin reappraise the michaela. If something is insoluble then it reappraise the priscilla. If something polemicise the michaela then it sneer the tomkin. If something reappraise the tomkin and it polemicise the tomkin then it polemicise the michaela. The michaela is not insoluble.", "logic": "\nReappraise(priscilla, tomkin)\nGratis(priscilla)\nSneer(priscilla, michaela)\nStylised(michaela)\nPolemicise(michaela, tomkin)\nSneer(michaela, priscilla)\nSneer(tomkin, michaela)\nforall x (Stylised(x) -> Reappraise(x, tomkin))\nforall x (Sneer(x, michaela) and Polemicise(x, priscilla) -> Polemicise(michaela, tomkin))\nSneer(priscilla, michaela) and Reappraise(priscilla, michaela) -> Reappraise(michaela, tomkin)\nReappraise(michaela, priscilla) -> Reappraise(priscilla, michaela)\nforall x (Sneer(x, priscilla) and Reappraise(x, tomkin) -> Reappraise(tomkin, michaela))\nforall x (Insoluble(x) -> Reappraise(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, michaela) -> Sneer(x, tomkin))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, tomkin) and Polemicise(x, tomkin) -> Polemicise(x, michaela))\n\nnot Insoluble(michaela)\n\nnot Insoluble(michaela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The erena define the konstance. The erena is shaken. The erena network the risa. The risa is yellowish. The risa disorient the konstance. The risa network the erena. The konstance network the risa. If something is yellowish then it define the konstance. If something network the risa and it disorient the erena then the risa disorient the konstance. If the erena network the risa and the erena define the risa then the risa define the konstance. If the risa define the erena then the erena define the risa. If something network the erena and it define the konstance then the konstance define the risa. If something is eighteenth then it define the erena. If something disorient the risa then it network the konstance. If something define the konstance and it disorient the konstance then it disorient the risa. The risa is shaken.", "logic": "\nDefine(erena, konstance)\nShaken(erena)\nNetwork(erena, risa)\nYellowish(risa)\nDisorient(risa, konstance)\nNetwork(risa, erena)\nNetwork(konstance, risa)\nforall x (Yellowish(x) -> Define(x, konstance))\nforall x (Network(x, risa) and Disorient(x, erena) -> Disorient(risa, konstance))\nNetwork(erena, risa) and Define(erena, risa) -> Define(risa, konstance)\nDefine(risa, erena) -> Define(erena, risa)\nforall x (Network(x, erena) and Define(x, konstance) -> Define(konstance, risa))\nforall x (Eighteenth(x) -> Define(x, erena))\nforall x (Disorient(x, risa) -> Network(x, konstance))\nforall x (Define(x, konstance) and Disorient(x, konstance) -> Disorient(x, risa))\n\nShaken(risa)\n\nShaken(risa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The lemmie whack the emmery. The lemmie is provincial. The lemmie safeguard the belinda. The belinda is sprouted. The belinda unscrew the emmery. The belinda safeguard the lemmie. The emmery safeguard the belinda. If something is sprouted then it whack the emmery. If something safeguard the belinda and it unscrew the lemmie then the belinda unscrew the emmery. If the lemmie safeguard the belinda and the lemmie whack the belinda then the belinda whack the emmery. If the belinda whack the lemmie then the lemmie whack the belinda. If something safeguard the lemmie and it whack the emmery then the emmery whack the belinda. If something is cyprinid then it whack the lemmie. If something unscrew the belinda then it safeguard the emmery. If something whack the emmery and it unscrew the emmery then it unscrew the belinda. The belinda is not young.", "logic": "\nWhack(lemmie, emmery)\nProvincial(lemmie)\nSafeguard(lemmie, belinda)\nSprouted(belinda)\nUnscrew(belinda, emmery)\nSafeguard(belinda, lemmie)\nSafeguard(emmery, belinda)\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Whack(x, emmery))\nforall x (Safeguard(x, belinda) and Unscrew(x, lemmie) -> Unscrew(belinda, emmery))\nSafeguard(lemmie, belinda) and Whack(lemmie, belinda) -> Whack(belinda, emmery)\nWhack(belinda, lemmie) -> Whack(lemmie, belinda)\nforall x (Safeguard(x, lemmie) and Whack(x, emmery) -> Whack(emmery, belinda))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) -> Whack(x, lemmie))\nforall x (Unscrew(x, belinda) -> Safeguard(x, emmery))\nforall x (Whack(x, emmery) and Unscrew(x, emmery) -> Unscrew(x, belinda))\n\nnot Young(belinda)\n\nnot Young(belinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The keenan scab the modesta. The keenan is octagonal. The keenan despair the rozina. The rozina is collagenic. The rozina infatuate the modesta. The rozina despair the keenan. The modesta despair the rozina. If something is collagenic then it scab the modesta. If something despair the rozina and it infatuate the keenan then the rozina infatuate the modesta. If the keenan despair the rozina and the keenan scab the rozina then the rozina scab the modesta. If the rozina scab the keenan then the keenan scab the rozina. If something despair the keenan and it scab the modesta then the modesta scab the rozina. If something is titulary then it scab the keenan. If something infatuate the rozina then it despair the modesta. If something scab the modesta and it infatuate the modesta then it infatuate the rozina. The modesta is collagenic.", "logic": "\nScab(keenan, modesta)\nOctagonal(keenan)\nDespair(keenan, rozina)\nCollagenic(rozina)\nInfatuate(rozina, modesta)\nDespair(rozina, keenan)\nDespair(modesta, rozina)\nforall x (Collagenic(x) -> Scab(x, modesta))\nforall x (Despair(x, rozina) and Infatuate(x, keenan) -> Infatuate(rozina, modesta))\nDespair(keenan, rozina) and Scab(keenan, rozina) -> Scab(rozina, modesta)\nScab(rozina, keenan) -> Scab(keenan, rozina)\nforall x (Despair(x, keenan) and Scab(x, modesta) -> Scab(modesta, rozina))\nforall x (Titulary(x) -> Scab(x, keenan))\nforall x (Infatuate(x, rozina) -> Despair(x, modesta))\nforall x (Scab(x, modesta) and Infatuate(x, modesta) -> Infatuate(x, rozina))\n\nCollagenic(modesta)\n\nCollagenic(modesta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The belvia microcopy the melisa. The belvia tower the amalee. The belvia is acute. The belvia is telltale. The belvia exult the melisa. The amalee is proustian. The melisa microcopy the amalee. If someone is proustian and they eat the amalee then the amalee is proustian. If the melisa exult the belvia and the belvia exult the melisa then the belvia is sourish. If the melisa does not eat the belvia then the melisa tower the amalee. If someone tower the amalee then they eat the melisa. If someone is proustian then they eat the melisa. If someone tower the amalee and the amalee microcopy the belvia then the belvia exult the amalee. If the belvia tower the melisa then the belvia is proustian. If someone tower the melisa then they chase the belvia. The belvia tower the amalee.", "logic": "\nMicrocopy(belvia, melisa)\nTower(belvia, amalee)\nAcute(belvia)\nTelltale(belvia)\nExult(belvia, melisa)\nProustian(amalee)\nMicrocopy(melisa, amalee)\nforall x (Proustian(x) and Tower(x, amalee) -> Proustian(amalee))\nExult(melisa, belvia) and Exult(belvia, melisa) -> Sourish(belvia)\nnot Tower(melisa, belvia) -> Tower(melisa, amalee)\nforall x (Tower(x, amalee) -> Tower(x, melisa))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Tower(x, melisa))\nforall x (Tower(x, amalee) and Microcopy(amalee, belvia) -> Exult(belvia, amalee))\nTower(belvia, melisa) -> Proustian(belvia)\nforall x (Tower(x, melisa) -> Microcopy(x, belvia))\n\nTower(belvia, amalee)\n\ntherefore Tower(belvia, amalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The eve leave the wileen. The eve squabble the corri. The eve is skim. The eve is nonporous. The eve hectograph the wileen. The corri is incumbent. The wileen leave the corri. If someone is incumbent and they eat the corri then the corri is incumbent. If the wileen hectograph the eve and the eve hectograph the wileen then the eve is unscripted. If the wileen does not eat the eve then the wileen squabble the corri. If someone squabble the corri then they eat the wileen. If someone is incumbent then they eat the wileen. If someone squabble the corri and the corri leave the eve then the eve hectograph the corri. If the eve squabble the wileen then the eve is incumbent. If someone squabble the wileen then they chase the eve. The wileen does not chase the corri.", "logic": "\nLeave(eve, wileen)\nSquabble(eve, corri)\nSkim(eve)\nNonporous(eve)\nHectograph(eve, wileen)\nIncumbent(corri)\nLeave(wileen, corri)\nforall x (Incumbent(x) and Squabble(x, corri) -> Incumbent(corri))\nHectograph(wileen, eve) and Hectograph(eve, wileen) -> Unscripted(eve)\nnot Squabble(wileen, eve) -> Squabble(wileen, corri)\nforall x (Squabble(x, corri) -> Squabble(x, wileen))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) -> Squabble(x, wileen))\nforall x (Squabble(x, corri) and Leave(corri, eve) -> Hectograph(eve, corri))\nSquabble(eve, wileen) -> Incumbent(eve)\nforall x (Squabble(x, wileen) -> Leave(x, eve))\n\nnot Leave(wileen, corri)\n\ntherefore Leave(wileen, corri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The garnet carry the richmond. The garnet brim the ottilie. The garnet is lawful. The garnet is dizygotic. The garnet vitaminize the richmond. The ottilie is three. The richmond carry the ottilie. If someone is three and they eat the ottilie then the ottilie is three. If the richmond vitaminize the garnet and the garnet vitaminize the richmond then the garnet is malarial. If the richmond does not eat the garnet then the richmond brim the ottilie. If someone brim the ottilie then they eat the richmond. If someone is three then they eat the richmond. If someone brim the ottilie and the ottilie carry the garnet then the garnet vitaminize the ottilie. If the garnet brim the richmond then the garnet is three. If someone brim the richmond then they chase the garnet. The ottilie brim the richmond.", "logic": "\nCarry(garnet, richmond)\nBrim(garnet, ottilie)\nLawful(garnet)\nDizygotic(garnet)\nVitaminize(garnet, richmond)\nThree(ottilie)\nCarry(richmond, ottilie)\nforall x (Three(x) and Brim(x, ottilie) -> Three(ottilie))\nVitaminize(richmond, garnet) and Vitaminize(garnet, richmond) -> Malarial(garnet)\nnot Brim(richmond, garnet) -> Brim(richmond, ottilie)\nforall x (Brim(x, ottilie) -> Brim(x, richmond))\nforall x (Three(x) -> Brim(x, richmond))\nforall x (Brim(x, ottilie) and Carry(ottilie, garnet) -> Vitaminize(garnet, ottilie))\nBrim(garnet, richmond) -> Three(garnet)\nforall x (Brim(x, richmond) -> Carry(x, garnet))\n\nBrim(ottilie, richmond)\n\nThree(ottilie) and forall x (Three(x) -> Brim(x, richmond)) -> therefore Brim(ottilie, richmond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The darleen reprise the jordanna. The darleen misgive the amabelle. The darleen is happy. The darleen is unfounded. The darleen omit the jordanna. The amabelle is brimfull. The jordanna reprise the amabelle. If someone is brimfull and they eat the amabelle then the amabelle is brimfull. If the jordanna omit the darleen and the darleen omit the jordanna then the darleen is drugless. If the jordanna does not eat the darleen then the jordanna misgive the amabelle. If someone misgive the amabelle then they eat the jordanna. If someone is brimfull then they eat the jordanna. If someone misgive the amabelle and the amabelle reprise the darleen then the darleen omit the amabelle. If the darleen misgive the jordanna then the darleen is brimfull. If someone misgive the jordanna then they chase the darleen. The amabelle does not eat the jordanna.", "logic": "\nReprise(darleen, jordanna)\nMisgive(darleen, amabelle)\nHappy(darleen)\nUnfounded(darleen)\nOmit(darleen, jordanna)\nBrimfull(amabelle)\nReprise(jordanna, amabelle)\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Misgive(x, amabelle) -> Brimfull(amabelle))\nOmit(jordanna, darleen) and Omit(darleen, jordanna) -> Drugless(darleen)\nnot Misgive(jordanna, darleen) -> Misgive(jordanna, amabelle)\nforall x (Misgive(x, amabelle) -> Misgive(x, jordanna))\nforall x (Brimfull(x) -> Misgive(x, jordanna))\nforall x (Misgive(x, amabelle) and Reprise(amabelle, darleen) -> Omit(darleen, amabelle))\nMisgive(darleen, jordanna) -> Brimfull(darleen)\nforall x (Misgive(x, jordanna) -> Reprise(x, darleen))\n\nnot Misgive(amabelle, jordanna)\n\nBrimfull(amabelle) and forall x (Brimfull(x) -> Misgive(x, jordanna)) -> therefore Misgive(amabelle, jordanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The chrissie steady the athena. The chrissie subtilise the lucy. The chrissie is heretical. The chrissie is titulary. The chrissie vitiate the athena. The lucy is apostolic. The athena steady the lucy. If someone is apostolic and they eat the lucy then the lucy is apostolic. If the athena vitiate the chrissie and the chrissie vitiate the athena then the chrissie is toughened. If the athena does not eat the chrissie then the athena subtilise the lucy. If someone subtilise the lucy then they eat the athena. If someone is apostolic then they eat the athena. If someone subtilise the lucy and the lucy steady the chrissie then the chrissie vitiate the lucy. If the chrissie subtilise the athena then the chrissie is apostolic. If someone subtilise the athena then they chase the chrissie. The lucy steady the chrissie.", "logic": "\nSteady(chrissie, athena)\nSubtilise(chrissie, lucy)\nHeretical(chrissie)\nTitulary(chrissie)\nVitiate(chrissie, athena)\nApostolic(lucy)\nSteady(athena, lucy)\nforall x (Apostolic(x) and Subtilise(x, lucy) -> Apostolic(lucy))\nVitiate(athena, chrissie) and Vitiate(chrissie, athena) -> Toughened(chrissie)\nnot Subtilise(athena, chrissie) -> Subtilise(athena, lucy)\nforall x (Subtilise(x, lucy) -> Subtilise(x, athena))\nforall x (Apostolic(x) -> Subtilise(x, athena))\nforall x (Subtilise(x, lucy) and Steady(lucy, chrissie) -> Vitiate(chrissie, lucy))\nSubtilise(chrissie, athena) -> Apostolic(chrissie)\nforall x (Subtilise(x, athena) -> Steady(x, chrissie))\n\nSteady(lucy, chrissie)\n\nApostolic(lucy) and forall x (Apostolic(x) -> Subtilise(x, athena)) -> therefore Subtilise(lucy, athena) Subtilise(lucy, athena) and forall x (Subtilise(x, athena) -> Steady(x, chrissie)) -> therefore Steady(lucy, chrissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The joseph jockey the dalila. The joseph clog the dasya. The joseph is unsalaried. The joseph is noted. The joseph appall the dalila. The dasya is denatured. The dalila jockey the dasya. If someone is denatured and they eat the dasya then the dasya is denatured. If the dalila appall the joseph and the joseph appall the dalila then the joseph is rimose. If the dalila does not eat the joseph then the dalila clog the dasya. If someone clog the dasya then they eat the dalila. If someone is denatured then they eat the dalila. If someone clog the dasya and the dasya jockey the joseph then the joseph appall the dasya. If the joseph clog the dalila then the joseph is denatured. If someone clog the dalila then they chase the joseph. The joseph is not denatured.", "logic": "\nJockey(joseph, dalila)\nClog(joseph, dasya)\nUnsalaried(joseph)\nNoted(joseph)\nAppall(joseph, dalila)\nDenatured(dasya)\nJockey(dalila, dasya)\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Clog(x, dasya) -> Denatured(dasya))\nAppall(dalila, joseph) and Appall(joseph, dalila) -> Rimose(joseph)\nnot Clog(dalila, joseph) -> Clog(dalila, dasya)\nforall x (Clog(x, dasya) -> Clog(x, dalila))\nforall x (Denatured(x) -> Clog(x, dalila))\nforall x (Clog(x, dasya) and Jockey(dasya, joseph) -> Appall(joseph, dasya))\nClog(joseph, dalila) -> Denatured(joseph)\nforall x (Clog(x, dalila) -> Jockey(x, joseph))\n\nnot Denatured(joseph)\n\nClog(joseph, dasya) and forall x (Clog(x, dasya) -> Clog(x, dalila)) -> therefore Clog(joseph, dalila) Clog(joseph, dalila) and Clog(joseph, dalila) -> Denatured(joseph) -> therefore Denatured(joseph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The paola outface the tony. The paola wash the annamarie. The paola is trifid. The paola is cogitable. The paola find the tony. The annamarie is grasping. The tony outface the annamarie. If someone is grasping and they eat the annamarie then the annamarie is grasping. If the tony find the paola and the paola find the tony then the paola is billion. If the tony does not eat the paola then the tony wash the annamarie. If someone wash the annamarie then they eat the tony. If someone is grasping then they eat the tony. If someone wash the annamarie and the annamarie outface the paola then the paola find the annamarie. If the paola wash the tony then the paola is grasping. If someone wash the tony then they chase the paola. The paola find the annamarie.", "logic": "\nOutface(paola, tony)\nWash(paola, annamarie)\nTrifid(paola)\nCogitable(paola)\nFind(paola, tony)\nGrasping(annamarie)\nOutface(tony, annamarie)\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Wash(x, annamarie) -> Grasping(annamarie))\nFind(tony, paola) and Find(paola, tony) -> Billion(paola)\nnot Wash(tony, paola) -> Wash(tony, annamarie)\nforall x (Wash(x, annamarie) -> Wash(x, tony))\nforall x (Grasping(x) -> Wash(x, tony))\nforall x (Wash(x, annamarie) and Outface(annamarie, paola) -> Find(paola, annamarie))\nWash(paola, tony) -> Grasping(paola)\nforall x (Wash(x, tony) -> Outface(x, paola))\n\nFind(paola, annamarie)\n\nGrasping(annamarie) and forall x (Grasping(x) -> Wash(x, tony)) -> therefore Wash(annamarie, tony) Wash(annamarie, tony) and forall x (Wash(x, tony) -> Outface(x, paola)) -> therefore Outface(annamarie, paola) Wash(paola, annamarie) and Outface(annamarie, paola) and forall x (Wash(x, annamarie) and Outface(annamarie, paola) -> Find(paola, annamarie)) -> therefore Find(paola, annamarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The aloise dehumanize the sidnee. The aloise entertain the desiree. The aloise is damascene. The aloise is plowed. The aloise miss the sidnee. The desiree is impending. The sidnee dehumanize the desiree. If someone is impending and they eat the desiree then the desiree is impending. If the sidnee miss the aloise and the aloise miss the sidnee then the aloise is rose. If the sidnee does not eat the aloise then the sidnee entertain the desiree. If someone entertain the desiree then they eat the sidnee. If someone is impending then they eat the sidnee. If someone entertain the desiree and the desiree dehumanize the aloise then the aloise miss the desiree. If the aloise entertain the sidnee then the aloise is impending. If someone entertain the sidnee then they chase the aloise. The aloise does not like the desiree.", "logic": "\nDehumanize(aloise, sidnee)\nEntertain(aloise, desiree)\nDamascene(aloise)\nPlowed(aloise)\nMiss(aloise, sidnee)\nImpending(desiree)\nDehumanize(sidnee, desiree)\nforall x (Impending(x) and Entertain(x, desiree) -> Impending(desiree))\nMiss(sidnee, aloise) and Miss(aloise, sidnee) -> Rose(aloise)\nnot Entertain(sidnee, aloise) -> Entertain(sidnee, desiree)\nforall x (Entertain(x, desiree) -> Entertain(x, sidnee))\nforall x (Impending(x) -> Entertain(x, sidnee))\nforall x (Entertain(x, desiree) and Dehumanize(desiree, aloise) -> Miss(aloise, desiree))\nEntertain(aloise, sidnee) -> Impending(aloise)\nforall x (Entertain(x, sidnee) -> Dehumanize(x, aloise))\n\nnot Miss(aloise, desiree)\n\nImpending(desiree) and forall x (Impending(x) -> Entertain(x, sidnee)) -> therefore Entertain(desiree, sidnee) Entertain(desiree, sidnee) and forall x (Entertain(x, sidnee) -> Dehumanize(x, aloise)) -> therefore Dehumanize(desiree, aloise) Entertain(aloise, desiree) and Dehumanize(desiree, aloise) and forall x (Entertain(x, desiree) and Dehumanize(desiree, aloise) -> Miss(aloise, desiree)) -> therefore Miss(aloise, desiree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The sissy quieten the damian. The sissy sclaff the fancy. The sissy is warring. The sissy is unmelodic. The sissy ingrain the damian. The fancy is stilly. The damian quieten the fancy. If someone is stilly and they eat the fancy then the fancy is stilly. If the damian ingrain the sissy and the sissy ingrain the damian then the sissy is jaggy. If the damian does not eat the sissy then the damian sclaff the fancy. If someone sclaff the fancy then they eat the damian. If someone is stilly then they eat the damian. If someone sclaff the fancy and the fancy quieten the sissy then the sissy ingrain the fancy. If the sissy sclaff the damian then the sissy is stilly. If someone sclaff the damian then they chase the sissy. The sissy is not jaggy.", "logic": "\nQuieten(sissy, damian)\nSclaff(sissy, fancy)\nWarring(sissy)\nUnmelodic(sissy)\nIngrain(sissy, damian)\nStilly(fancy)\nQuieten(damian, fancy)\nforall x (Stilly(x) and Sclaff(x, fancy) -> Stilly(fancy))\nIngrain(damian, sissy) and Ingrain(sissy, damian) -> Jaggy(sissy)\nnot Sclaff(damian, sissy) -> Sclaff(damian, fancy)\nforall x (Sclaff(x, fancy) -> Sclaff(x, damian))\nforall x (Stilly(x) -> Sclaff(x, damian))\nforall x (Sclaff(x, fancy) and Quieten(fancy, sissy) -> Ingrain(sissy, fancy))\nSclaff(sissy, damian) -> Stilly(sissy)\nforall x (Sclaff(x, damian) -> Quieten(x, sissy))\n\nnot Jaggy(sissy)\n\nIngrain(damian, sissy) and Ingrain(sissy, damian) -> Jaggy(sissy) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The hynda prank the dannie. The hynda confide the aliza. The hynda is scarce. The hynda is conic. The hynda fell the dannie. The aliza is employed. The dannie prank the aliza. If someone is employed and they eat the aliza then the aliza is employed. If the dannie fell the hynda and the hynda fell the dannie then the hynda is tardy. If the dannie does not eat the hynda then the dannie confide the aliza. If someone confide the aliza then they eat the dannie. If someone is employed then they eat the dannie. If someone confide the aliza and the aliza prank the hynda then the hynda fell the aliza. If the hynda confide the dannie then the hynda is employed. If someone confide the dannie then they chase the hynda. The dannie prank the hynda.", "logic": "\nPrank(hynda, dannie)\nConfide(hynda, aliza)\nScarce(hynda)\nConic(hynda)\nFell(hynda, dannie)\nEmployed(aliza)\nPrank(dannie, aliza)\nforall x (Employed(x) and Confide(x, aliza) -> Employed(aliza))\nFell(dannie, hynda) and Fell(hynda, dannie) -> Tardy(hynda)\nnot Confide(dannie, hynda) -> Confide(dannie, aliza)\nforall x (Confide(x, aliza) -> Confide(x, dannie))\nforall x (Employed(x) -> Confide(x, dannie))\nforall x (Confide(x, aliza) and Prank(aliza, hynda) -> Fell(hynda, aliza))\nConfide(hynda, dannie) -> Employed(hynda)\nforall x (Confide(x, dannie) -> Prank(x, hynda))\n\nPrank(dannie, hynda)\n\nforall x (Confide(x, dannie) -> Prank(x, hynda)) <- forall x (Confide(x, aliza) -> Confide(x, dannie)) <- not Confide(dannie, hynda) -> Confide(dannie, aliza) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The vinni unfit the hezekiah. The vinni verge the ranice. The vinni is stagy. The vinni is sunset. The vinni brainstorm the hezekiah. The ranice is catenulate. The hezekiah unfit the ranice. If someone is catenulate and they eat the ranice then the ranice is catenulate. If the hezekiah brainstorm the vinni and the vinni brainstorm the hezekiah then the vinni is revenant. If the hezekiah does not eat the vinni then the hezekiah verge the ranice. If someone verge the ranice then they eat the hezekiah. If someone is catenulate then they eat the hezekiah. If someone verge the ranice and the ranice unfit the vinni then the vinni brainstorm the ranice. If the vinni verge the hezekiah then the vinni is catenulate. If someone verge the hezekiah then they chase the vinni. The hezekiah does not eat the ranice.", "logic": "\nUnfit(vinni, hezekiah)\nVerge(vinni, ranice)\nStagy(vinni)\nSunset(vinni)\nBrainstorm(vinni, hezekiah)\nCatenulate(ranice)\nUnfit(hezekiah, ranice)\nforall x (Catenulate(x) and Verge(x, ranice) -> Catenulate(ranice))\nBrainstorm(hezekiah, vinni) and Brainstorm(vinni, hezekiah) -> Revenant(vinni)\nnot Verge(hezekiah, vinni) -> Verge(hezekiah, ranice)\nforall x (Verge(x, ranice) -> Verge(x, hezekiah))\nforall x (Catenulate(x) -> Verge(x, hezekiah))\nforall x (Verge(x, ranice) and Unfit(ranice, vinni) -> Brainstorm(vinni, ranice))\nVerge(vinni, hezekiah) -> Catenulate(vinni)\nforall x (Verge(x, hezekiah) -> Unfit(x, vinni))\n\nnot Verge(hezekiah, ranice)\n\nnot Verge(hezekiah, vinni) -> Verge(hezekiah, ranice) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The marcia parley the eadie. The marcia tether the danie. The marcia is epidemic. The marcia is arawakan. The marcia fluff the eadie. The danie is cresson. The eadie parley the danie. If someone is cresson and they eat the danie then the danie is cresson. If the eadie fluff the marcia and the marcia fluff the eadie then the marcia is nonchalant. If the eadie does not eat the marcia then the eadie tether the danie. If someone tether the danie then they eat the eadie. If someone is cresson then they eat the eadie. If someone tether the danie and the danie parley the marcia then the marcia fluff the danie. If the marcia tether the eadie then the marcia is cresson. If someone tether the eadie then they chase the marcia. The eadie tether the eadie.", "logic": "\nParley(marcia, eadie)\nTether(marcia, danie)\nEpidemic(marcia)\nArawakan(marcia)\nFluff(marcia, eadie)\nCresson(danie)\nParley(eadie, danie)\nforall x (Cresson(x) and Tether(x, danie) -> Cresson(danie))\nFluff(eadie, marcia) and Fluff(marcia, eadie) -> Nonchalant(marcia)\nnot Tether(eadie, marcia) -> Tether(eadie, danie)\nforall x (Tether(x, danie) -> Tether(x, eadie))\nforall x (Cresson(x) -> Tether(x, eadie))\nforall x (Tether(x, danie) and Parley(danie, marcia) -> Fluff(marcia, danie))\nTether(marcia, eadie) -> Cresson(marcia)\nforall x (Tether(x, eadie) -> Parley(x, marcia))\n\nTether(eadie, eadie)\n\nforall x (Tether(x, danie) -> Tether(x, eadie)) <- not Tether(eadie, marcia) -> Tether(eadie, danie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The gifford chase the carolin. The gifford hunch the davidson. The gifford is brushy. The gifford is prewar. The gifford confer the carolin. The davidson is manky. The carolin chase the davidson. If someone is manky and they eat the davidson then the davidson is manky. If the carolin confer the gifford and the gifford confer the carolin then the gifford is powerful. If the carolin does not eat the gifford then the carolin hunch the davidson. If someone hunch the davidson then they eat the carolin. If someone is manky then they eat the carolin. If someone hunch the davidson and the davidson chase the gifford then the gifford confer the davidson. If the gifford hunch the carolin then the gifford is manky. If someone hunch the carolin then they chase the gifford. The carolin does not chase the carolin.", "logic": "\nChase(gifford, carolin)\nHunch(gifford, davidson)\nBrushy(gifford)\nPrewar(gifford)\nConfer(gifford, carolin)\nManky(davidson)\nChase(carolin, davidson)\nforall x (Manky(x) and Hunch(x, davidson) -> Manky(davidson))\nConfer(carolin, gifford) and Confer(gifford, carolin) -> Powerful(gifford)\nnot Hunch(carolin, gifford) -> Hunch(carolin, davidson)\nforall x (Hunch(x, davidson) -> Hunch(x, carolin))\nforall x (Manky(x) -> Hunch(x, carolin))\nforall x (Hunch(x, davidson) and Chase(davidson, gifford) -> Confer(gifford, davidson))\nHunch(gifford, carolin) -> Manky(gifford)\nforall x (Hunch(x, carolin) -> Chase(x, gifford))\n\nnot Chase(carolin, carolin)\n\nnot Chase(carolin, carolin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The chelsie brook the dannye. The chelsie tent the henrik. The chelsie is askance. The chelsie is toothsome. The chelsie beleaguer the dannye. The henrik is kindly. The dannye brook the henrik. If someone is kindly and they eat the henrik then the henrik is kindly. If the dannye beleaguer the chelsie and the chelsie beleaguer the dannye then the chelsie is tinseled. If the dannye does not eat the chelsie then the dannye tent the henrik. If someone tent the henrik then they eat the dannye. If someone is kindly then they eat the dannye. If someone tent the henrik and the henrik brook the chelsie then the chelsie beleaguer the henrik. If the chelsie tent the dannye then the chelsie is kindly. If someone tent the dannye then they chase the chelsie. The chelsie beleaguer the chelsie.", "logic": "\nBrook(chelsie, dannye)\nTent(chelsie, henrik)\nAskance(chelsie)\nToothsome(chelsie)\nBeleaguer(chelsie, dannye)\nKindly(henrik)\nBrook(dannye, henrik)\nforall x (Kindly(x) and Tent(x, henrik) -> Kindly(henrik))\nBeleaguer(dannye, chelsie) and Beleaguer(chelsie, dannye) -> Tinseled(chelsie)\nnot Tent(dannye, chelsie) -> Tent(dannye, henrik)\nforall x (Tent(x, henrik) -> Tent(x, dannye))\nforall x (Kindly(x) -> Tent(x, dannye))\nforall x (Tent(x, henrik) and Brook(henrik, chelsie) -> Beleaguer(chelsie, henrik))\nTent(chelsie, dannye) -> Kindly(chelsie)\nforall x (Tent(x, dannye) -> Brook(x, chelsie))\n\nBeleaguer(chelsie, chelsie)\n\nBeleaguer(chelsie, chelsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The dore defile the ilka. The dore repair the maria. The dore is funguslike. The dore is denotative. The dore abide the ilka. The maria is phalangeal. The ilka defile the maria. If someone is phalangeal and they eat the maria then the maria is phalangeal. If the ilka abide the dore and the dore abide the ilka then the dore is rotted. If the ilka does not eat the dore then the ilka repair the maria. If someone repair the maria then they eat the ilka. If someone is phalangeal then they eat the ilka. If someone repair the maria and the maria defile the dore then the dore abide the maria. If the dore repair the ilka then the dore is phalangeal. If someone repair the ilka then they chase the dore. The dore does not eat the dore.", "logic": "\nDefile(dore, ilka)\nRepair(dore, maria)\nFunguslike(dore)\nDenotative(dore)\nAbide(dore, ilka)\nPhalangeal(maria)\nDefile(ilka, maria)\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) and Repair(x, maria) -> Phalangeal(maria))\nAbide(ilka, dore) and Abide(dore, ilka) -> Rotted(dore)\nnot Repair(ilka, dore) -> Repair(ilka, maria)\nforall x (Repair(x, maria) -> Repair(x, ilka))\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) -> Repair(x, ilka))\nforall x (Repair(x, maria) and Defile(maria, dore) -> Abide(dore, maria))\nRepair(dore, ilka) -> Phalangeal(dore)\nforall x (Repair(x, ilka) -> Defile(x, dore))\n\nnot Repair(dore, dore)\n\nnot Repair(dore, dore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The rafaela barde the glynda. The rafaela thumb the cariotta. The rafaela is unerect. The rafaela is gauche. The rafaela spang the glynda. The cariotta is pushful. The glynda barde the cariotta. If someone is pushful and they eat the cariotta then the cariotta is pushful. If the glynda spang the rafaela and the rafaela spang the glynda then the rafaela is angled. If the glynda does not eat the rafaela then the glynda thumb the cariotta. If someone thumb the cariotta then they eat the glynda. If someone is pushful then they eat the glynda. If someone thumb the cariotta and the cariotta barde the rafaela then the rafaela spang the cariotta. If the rafaela thumb the glynda then the rafaela is pushful. If someone thumb the glynda then they chase the rafaela. The rafaela barde the cariotta.", "logic": "\nBarde(rafaela, glynda)\nThumb(rafaela, cariotta)\nUnerect(rafaela)\nGauche(rafaela)\nSpang(rafaela, glynda)\nPushful(cariotta)\nBarde(glynda, cariotta)\nforall x (Pushful(x) and Thumb(x, cariotta) -> Pushful(cariotta))\nSpang(glynda, rafaela) and Spang(rafaela, glynda) -> Angled(rafaela)\nnot Thumb(glynda, rafaela) -> Thumb(glynda, cariotta)\nforall x (Thumb(x, cariotta) -> Thumb(x, glynda))\nforall x (Pushful(x) -> Thumb(x, glynda))\nforall x (Thumb(x, cariotta) and Barde(cariotta, rafaela) -> Spang(rafaela, cariotta))\nThumb(rafaela, glynda) -> Pushful(rafaela)\nforall x (Thumb(x, glynda) -> Barde(x, rafaela))\n\nBarde(rafaela, cariotta)\n\nBarde(rafaela, cariotta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "Nicole is witty. Nicole is spendable. Nicole is madcap. Nicole is not manly. Nicole is repentant. Emelyne is witty. Emelyne is manly. Ofelia is not spendable. Ofelia is madcap. Ofelia is repentant. Milo is manly. Milo is repentant. Quiet people are spendable. If Emelyne is spendable then Emelyne is not repentant. If someone is carpellary and not manly then they are repentant. If someone is madcap then they are gone. If someone is witty and not repentant then they are gone. If someone is repentant and not witty then they are gone. Emelyne is manly.", "logic": "\nWitty(nicole)\nSpendable(nicole)\nMadcap(nicole)\nnot Manly(nicole)\nRepentant(nicole)\nWitty(emelyne)\nManly(emelyne)\nnot Spendable(ofelia)\nMadcap(ofelia)\nRepentant(ofelia)\nManly(milo)\nRepentant(milo)\nforall x (Manly(x) -> Spendable(x))\nSpendable(emelyne) -> not Repentant(emelyne)\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and not Manly(x) -> Repentant(x))\nforall x (Madcap(x) -> Gone(x))\nforall x (Witty(x) and not Repentant(x) -> Gone(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) and not Witty(x) -> Gone(x))\n\nManly(emelyne)\n\ntherefore Manly(emelyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Morganne is hogged. Morganne is tiptop. Morganne is hardcover. Morganne is not subgross. Morganne is doughy. Mildred is hogged. Mildred is subgross. Dotty is not tiptop. Dotty is hardcover. Dotty is doughy. Johnna is subgross. Johnna is doughy. Quiet people are tiptop. If Mildred is tiptop then Mildred is not doughy. If someone is untaught and not subgross then they are doughy. If someone is hardcover then they are lentissimo. If someone is hogged and not doughy then they are lentissimo. If someone is doughy and not hogged then they are lentissimo. Morganne is subgross.", "logic": "\nHogged(morganne)\nTiptop(morganne)\nHardcover(morganne)\nnot Subgross(morganne)\nDoughy(morganne)\nHogged(mildred)\nSubgross(mildred)\nnot Tiptop(dotty)\nHardcover(dotty)\nDoughy(dotty)\nSubgross(johnna)\nDoughy(johnna)\nforall x (Subgross(x) -> Tiptop(x))\nTiptop(mildred) -> not Doughy(mildred)\nforall x (Untaught(x) and not Subgross(x) -> Doughy(x))\nforall x (Hardcover(x) -> Lentissimo(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) and not Doughy(x) -> Lentissimo(x))\nforall x (Doughy(x) and not Hogged(x) -> Lentissimo(x))\n\nSubgross(morganne)\n\ntherefore not Subgross(morganne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Rosaleen is thermionic. Rosaleen is jittery. Rosaleen is calculable. Rosaleen is not unheard. Rosaleen is undimmed. Lawton is thermionic. Lawton is unheard. Wenonah is not jittery. Wenonah is calculable. Wenonah is undimmed. Siegfried is unheard. Siegfried is undimmed. Quiet people are jittery. If Lawton is jittery then Lawton is not undimmed. If someone is biogenous and not unheard then they are undimmed. If someone is calculable then they are anicteric. If someone is thermionic and not undimmed then they are anicteric. If someone is undimmed and not thermionic then they are anicteric. Wenonah is anicteric.", "logic": "\nThermionic(rosaleen)\nJittery(rosaleen)\nCalculable(rosaleen)\nnot Unheard(rosaleen)\nUndimmed(rosaleen)\nThermionic(lawton)\nUnheard(lawton)\nnot Jittery(wenonah)\nCalculable(wenonah)\nUndimmed(wenonah)\nUnheard(siegfried)\nUndimmed(siegfried)\nforall x (Unheard(x) -> Jittery(x))\nJittery(lawton) -> not Undimmed(lawton)\nforall x (Biogenous(x) and not Unheard(x) -> Undimmed(x))\nforall x (Calculable(x) -> Anicteric(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) and not Undimmed(x) -> Anicteric(x))\nforall x (Undimmed(x) and not Thermionic(x) -> Anicteric(x))\n\nAnicteric(wenonah)\n\nCalculable(wenonah) and forall x (Calculable(x) -> Anicteric(x)) -> therefore Anicteric(wenonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Aleck is giving. Aleck is midi. Aleck is personable. Aleck is not doomed. Aleck is nurtural. Kristal is giving. Kristal is doomed. Zak is not midi. Zak is personable. Zak is nurtural. Katy is doomed. Katy is nurtural. Quiet people are midi. If Kristal is midi then Kristal is not nurtural. If someone is clunky and not doomed then they are nurtural. If someone is personable then they are expansile. If someone is giving and not nurtural then they are expansile. If someone is nurtural and not giving then they are expansile. Zak is not expansile.", "logic": "\nGiving(aleck)\nMidi(aleck)\nPersonable(aleck)\nnot Doomed(aleck)\nNurtural(aleck)\nGiving(kristal)\nDoomed(kristal)\nnot Midi(zak)\nPersonable(zak)\nNurtural(zak)\nDoomed(katy)\nNurtural(katy)\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Midi(x))\nMidi(kristal) -> not Nurtural(kristal)\nforall x (Clunky(x) and not Doomed(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Personable(x) -> Expansile(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and not Nurtural(x) -> Expansile(x))\nforall x (Nurtural(x) and not Giving(x) -> Expansile(x))\n\nnot Expansile(zak)\n\nPersonable(zak) and forall x (Personable(x) -> Expansile(x)) -> therefore Expansile(zak)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Gabrielle is scrimy. Gabrielle is visaged. Gabrielle is screwy. Gabrielle is not sere. Gabrielle is dutch. Rourke is scrimy. Rourke is sere. Quent is not visaged. Quent is screwy. Quent is dutch. Cletus is sere. Cletus is dutch. Quiet people are visaged. If Rourke is visaged then Rourke is not dutch. If someone is tumultuous and not sere then they are dutch. If someone is screwy then they are spurting. If someone is scrimy and not dutch then they are spurting. If someone is dutch and not scrimy then they are spurting. Rourke is not dutch.", "logic": "\nScrimy(gabrielle)\nVisaged(gabrielle)\nScrewy(gabrielle)\nnot Sere(gabrielle)\nDutch(gabrielle)\nScrimy(rourke)\nSere(rourke)\nnot Visaged(quent)\nScrewy(quent)\nDutch(quent)\nSere(cletus)\nDutch(cletus)\nforall x (Sere(x) -> Visaged(x))\nVisaged(rourke) -> not Dutch(rourke)\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) and not Sere(x) -> Dutch(x))\nforall x (Screwy(x) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) and not Dutch(x) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Dutch(x) and not Scrimy(x) -> Spurting(x))\n\nnot Dutch(rourke)\n\nSere(rourke) and forall x (Sere(x) -> Visaged(x)) -> therefore Visaged(rourke) Visaged(rourke) and Visaged(rourke) -> not Dutch(rourke) -> therefore not Dutch(rourke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Dido is narrow. Dido is unnerving. Dido is echoing. Dido is not maddened. Dido is stewed. Carlyle is narrow. Carlyle is maddened. Kalinda is not unnerving. Kalinda is echoing. Kalinda is stewed. Wrennie is maddened. Wrennie is stewed. Quiet people are unnerving. If Carlyle is unnerving then Carlyle is not stewed. If someone is friendly and not maddened then they are stewed. If someone is echoing then they are energizing. If someone is narrow and not stewed then they are energizing. If someone is stewed and not narrow then they are energizing. Carlyle is stewed.", "logic": "\nNarrow(dido)\nUnnerving(dido)\nEchoing(dido)\nnot Maddened(dido)\nStewed(dido)\nNarrow(carlyle)\nMaddened(carlyle)\nnot Unnerving(kalinda)\nEchoing(kalinda)\nStewed(kalinda)\nMaddened(wrennie)\nStewed(wrennie)\nforall x (Maddened(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nUnnerving(carlyle) -> not Stewed(carlyle)\nforall x (Friendly(x) and not Maddened(x) -> Stewed(x))\nforall x (Echoing(x) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Narrow(x) and not Stewed(x) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) and not Narrow(x) -> Energizing(x))\n\nStewed(carlyle)\n\nMaddened(carlyle) and forall x (Maddened(x) -> Unnerving(x)) -> therefore Unnerving(carlyle) Unnerving(carlyle) and Unnerving(carlyle) -> not Stewed(carlyle) -> therefore not Stewed(carlyle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Amalita is turgid. Amalita is weak. Amalita is tomboyish. Amalita is not sensitised. Amalita is gaudy. Rubetta is turgid. Rubetta is sensitised. Benson is not weak. Benson is tomboyish. Benson is gaudy. Lauretta is sensitised. Lauretta is gaudy. Quiet people are weak. If Rubetta is weak then Rubetta is not gaudy. If someone is intrastate and not sensitised then they are gaudy. If someone is tomboyish then they are muciferous. If someone is turgid and not gaudy then they are muciferous. If someone is gaudy and not turgid then they are muciferous. Rubetta is muciferous.", "logic": "\nTurgid(amalita)\nWeak(amalita)\nTomboyish(amalita)\nnot Sensitised(amalita)\nGaudy(amalita)\nTurgid(rubetta)\nSensitised(rubetta)\nnot Weak(benson)\nTomboyish(benson)\nGaudy(benson)\nSensitised(lauretta)\nGaudy(lauretta)\nforall x (Sensitised(x) -> Weak(x))\nWeak(rubetta) -> not Gaudy(rubetta)\nforall x (Intrastate(x) and not Sensitised(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Turgid(x) and not Gaudy(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and not Turgid(x) -> Muciferous(x))\n\nMuciferous(rubetta)\n\nSensitised(rubetta) and forall x (Sensitised(x) -> Weak(x)) -> therefore Weak(rubetta) Weak(rubetta) and Weak(rubetta) -> not Gaudy(rubetta) -> therefore not Gaudy(rubetta) Turgid(rubetta) and not Gaudy(rubetta) and forall x (Turgid(x) and not Gaudy(x) -> Muciferous(x)) -> therefore Muciferous(rubetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Willard is punctured. Willard is rococo. Willard is implicit. Willard is not unproven. Willard is consummate. Melva is punctured. Melva is unproven. Annora is not rococo. Annora is implicit. Annora is consummate. Roanna is unproven. Roanna is consummate. Quiet people are rococo. If Melva is rococo then Melva is not consummate. If someone is vermillion and not unproven then they are consummate. If someone is implicit then they are assigned. If someone is punctured and not consummate then they are assigned. If someone is consummate and not punctured then they are assigned. Melva is not assigned.", "logic": "\nPunctured(willard)\nRococo(willard)\nImplicit(willard)\nnot Unproven(willard)\nConsummate(willard)\nPunctured(melva)\nUnproven(melva)\nnot Rococo(annora)\nImplicit(annora)\nConsummate(annora)\nUnproven(roanna)\nConsummate(roanna)\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Rococo(x))\nRococo(melva) -> not Consummate(melva)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) and not Unproven(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Implicit(x) -> Assigned(x))\nforall x (Punctured(x) and not Consummate(x) -> Assigned(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) and not Punctured(x) -> Assigned(x))\n\nnot Assigned(melva)\n\nUnproven(melva) and forall x (Unproven(x) -> Rococo(x)) -> therefore Rococo(melva) Rococo(melva) and Rococo(melva) -> not Consummate(melva) -> therefore not Consummate(melva) Punctured(melva) and not Consummate(melva) and forall x (Punctured(x) and not Consummate(x) -> Assigned(x)) -> therefore Assigned(melva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Jocelyne is branded. Jocelyne is nipping. Jocelyne is exegetic. Jocelyne is not limiting. Jocelyne is stimulated. Ileane is branded. Ileane is limiting. Richmond is not nipping. Richmond is exegetic. Richmond is stimulated. Lita is limiting. Lita is stimulated. Quiet people are nipping. If Ileane is nipping then Ileane is not stimulated. If someone is husbandly and not limiting then they are stimulated. If someone is exegetic then they are bimetal. If someone is branded and not stimulated then they are bimetal. If someone is stimulated and not branded then they are bimetal. Lita is not bimetal.", "logic": "\nBranded(jocelyne)\nNipping(jocelyne)\nExegetic(jocelyne)\nnot Limiting(jocelyne)\nStimulated(jocelyne)\nBranded(ileane)\nLimiting(ileane)\nnot Nipping(richmond)\nExegetic(richmond)\nStimulated(richmond)\nLimiting(lita)\nStimulated(lita)\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Nipping(x))\nNipping(ileane) -> not Stimulated(ileane)\nforall x (Husbandly(x) and not Limiting(x) -> Stimulated(x))\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Branded(x) and not Stimulated(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) and not Branded(x) -> Bimetal(x))\n\nnot Bimetal(lita)\n\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Bimetal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Zachariah is underdone. Zachariah is outcaste. Zachariah is jocose. Zachariah is not conscious. Zachariah is caesarian. Tildi is underdone. Tildi is conscious. Wandis is not outcaste. Wandis is jocose. Wandis is caesarian. Alastair is conscious. Alastair is caesarian. Quiet people are outcaste. If Tildi is outcaste then Tildi is not caesarian. If someone is vixenish and not conscious then they are caesarian. If someone is jocose then they are shirty. If someone is underdone and not caesarian then they are shirty. If someone is caesarian and not underdone then they are shirty. Wandis is conscious.", "logic": "\nUnderdone(zachariah)\nOutcaste(zachariah)\nJocose(zachariah)\nnot Conscious(zachariah)\nCaesarian(zachariah)\nUnderdone(tildi)\nConscious(tildi)\nnot Outcaste(wandis)\nJocose(wandis)\nCaesarian(wandis)\nConscious(alastair)\nCaesarian(alastair)\nforall x (Conscious(x) -> Outcaste(x))\nOutcaste(tildi) -> not Caesarian(tildi)\nforall x (Vixenish(x) and not Conscious(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Shirty(x))\nforall x (Underdone(x) and not Caesarian(x) -> Shirty(x))\nforall x (Caesarian(x) and not Underdone(x) -> Shirty(x))\n\nConscious(wandis)\n\nConscious(wandis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Wilson is corruptive. Wilson is artless. Wilson is phoenician. Wilson is not flushed. Wilson is higher. Tailor is corruptive. Tailor is flushed. Kalman is not artless. Kalman is phoenician. Kalman is higher. Sim is flushed. Sim is higher. Quiet people are artless. If Tailor is artless then Tailor is not higher. If someone is floaty and not flushed then they are higher. If someone is phoenician then they are generous. If someone is corruptive and not higher then they are generous. If someone is higher and not corruptive then they are generous. Sim is not floaty.", "logic": "\nCorruptive(wilson)\nArtless(wilson)\nPhoenician(wilson)\nnot Flushed(wilson)\nHigher(wilson)\nCorruptive(tailor)\nFlushed(tailor)\nnot Artless(kalman)\nPhoenician(kalman)\nHigher(kalman)\nFlushed(sim)\nHigher(sim)\nforall x (Flushed(x) -> Artless(x))\nArtless(tailor) -> not Higher(tailor)\nforall x (Floaty(x) and not Flushed(x) -> Higher(x))\nforall x (Phoenician(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) and not Higher(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Higher(x) and not Corruptive(x) -> Generous(x))\n\nnot Floaty(sim)\n\nnot Floaty(sim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Nico is bended. Nico is inapt. Nico is callous. Nico is not filariid. Nico is insolvent. Kiersten is bended. Kiersten is filariid. Marjie is not inapt. Marjie is callous. Marjie is insolvent. Lucinda is filariid. Lucinda is insolvent. Quiet people are inapt. If Kiersten is inapt then Kiersten is not insolvent. If someone is socialised and not filariid then they are insolvent. If someone is callous then they are operose. If someone is bended and not insolvent then they are operose. If someone is insolvent and not bended then they are operose. Kiersten is socialised.", "logic": "\nBended(nico)\nInapt(nico)\nCallous(nico)\nnot Filariid(nico)\nInsolvent(nico)\nBended(kiersten)\nFilariid(kiersten)\nnot Inapt(marjie)\nCallous(marjie)\nInsolvent(marjie)\nFilariid(lucinda)\nInsolvent(lucinda)\nforall x (Filariid(x) -> Inapt(x))\nInapt(kiersten) -> not Insolvent(kiersten)\nforall x (Socialised(x) and not Filariid(x) -> Insolvent(x))\nforall x (Callous(x) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Bended(x) and not Insolvent(x) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Insolvent(x) and not Bended(x) -> Operose(x))\n\nSocialised(kiersten)\n\nSocialised(kiersten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Edi is mussy. Edi is centesimal. Edi is toneless. Edi is not undersea. Edi is cultured. Yoshi is mussy. Yoshi is undersea. Shelby is not centesimal. Shelby is toneless. Shelby is cultured. Adam is undersea. Adam is cultured. Quiet people are centesimal. If Yoshi is centesimal then Yoshi is not cultured. If someone is aoristic and not undersea then they are cultured. If someone is toneless then they are charged. If someone is mussy and not cultured then they are charged. If someone is cultured and not mussy then they are charged. Shelby is not mussy.", "logic": "\nMussy(edi)\nCentesimal(edi)\nToneless(edi)\nnot Undersea(edi)\nCultured(edi)\nMussy(yoshi)\nUndersea(yoshi)\nnot Centesimal(shelby)\nToneless(shelby)\nCultured(shelby)\nUndersea(adam)\nCultured(adam)\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Centesimal(x))\nCentesimal(yoshi) -> not Cultured(yoshi)\nforall x (Aoristic(x) and not Undersea(x) -> Cultured(x))\nforall x (Toneless(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Mussy(x) and not Cultured(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Cultured(x) and not Mussy(x) -> Charged(x))\n\nnot Mussy(shelby)\n\nnot Mussy(shelby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Verina is batholitic. Verina is jewelled. Verina is unbeholden. Verina is not probatory. Verina is unspaced. Ede is batholitic. Ede is probatory. Skyler is not jewelled. Skyler is unbeholden. Skyler is unspaced. Ania is probatory. Ania is unspaced. Quiet people are jewelled. If Ede is jewelled then Ede is not unspaced. If someone is formalized and not probatory then they are unspaced. If someone is unbeholden then they are woeful. If someone is batholitic and not unspaced then they are woeful. If someone is unspaced and not batholitic then they are woeful. Ede is unbeholden.", "logic": "\nBatholitic(verina)\nJewelled(verina)\nUnbeholden(verina)\nnot Probatory(verina)\nUnspaced(verina)\nBatholitic(ede)\nProbatory(ede)\nnot Jewelled(skyler)\nUnbeholden(skyler)\nUnspaced(skyler)\nProbatory(ania)\nUnspaced(ania)\nforall x (Probatory(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nJewelled(ede) -> not Unspaced(ede)\nforall x (Formalized(x) and not Probatory(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) -> Woeful(x))\nforall x (Batholitic(x) and not Unspaced(x) -> Woeful(x))\nforall x (Unspaced(x) and not Batholitic(x) -> Woeful(x))\n\nUnbeholden(ede)\n\nUnbeholden(ede) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Storey is agog. Storey is arenaceous. Storey is ascending. Storey is not cozy. Storey is sinuate. Kourtney is agog. Kourtney is cozy. Nealy is not arenaceous. Nealy is ascending. Nealy is sinuate. Crysta is cozy. Crysta is sinuate. Quiet people are arenaceous. If Kourtney is arenaceous then Kourtney is not sinuate. If someone is ectodermal and not cozy then they are sinuate. If someone is ascending then they are catholic. If someone is agog and not sinuate then they are catholic. If someone is sinuate and not agog then they are catholic. Nealy is not ectodermal.", "logic": "\nAgog(storey)\nArenaceous(storey)\nAscending(storey)\nnot Cozy(storey)\nSinuate(storey)\nAgog(kourtney)\nCozy(kourtney)\nnot Arenaceous(nealy)\nAscending(nealy)\nSinuate(nealy)\nCozy(crysta)\nSinuate(crysta)\nforall x (Cozy(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\nArenaceous(kourtney) -> not Sinuate(kourtney)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and not Cozy(x) -> Sinuate(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Agog(x) and not Sinuate(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Sinuate(x) and not Agog(x) -> Catholic(x))\n\nnot Ectodermal(nealy)\n\nnot Ectodermal(nealy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Junina is yellow. Junina is oblate. Junina is genoese. Junina is not postmodern. Junina is glassy. Benedikta is yellow. Benedikta is postmodern. Jessamine is not oblate. Jessamine is genoese. Jessamine is glassy. Edith is postmodern. Edith is glassy. Quiet people are oblate. If Benedikta is oblate then Benedikta is not glassy. If someone is sarawakian and not postmodern then they are glassy. If someone is genoese then they are glowering. If someone is yellow and not glassy then they are glowering. If someone is glassy and not yellow then they are glowering. Junina is sarawakian.", "logic": "\nYellow(junina)\nOblate(junina)\nGenoese(junina)\nnot Postmodern(junina)\nGlassy(junina)\nYellow(benedikta)\nPostmodern(benedikta)\nnot Oblate(jessamine)\nGenoese(jessamine)\nGlassy(jessamine)\nPostmodern(edith)\nGlassy(edith)\nforall x (Postmodern(x) -> Oblate(x))\nOblate(benedikta) -> not Glassy(benedikta)\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and not Postmodern(x) -> Glassy(x))\nforall x (Genoese(x) -> Glowering(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) and not Glassy(x) -> Glowering(x))\nforall x (Glassy(x) and not Yellow(x) -> Glowering(x))\n\nSarawakian(junina)\n\nSarawakian(junina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Noble is achenial. Odilia is enforced. Antonia is achenial. If something is beechen then it is actable. All enforced, actable things are base. Furry, enforced things are not base. All enforced things are beechen. If Antonia is enforced and Antonia is base then Antonia is achenial. All enforced, achenial things are liquid. Antonia is achenial.", "logic": "\nAchenial(noble)\nEnforced(odilia)\nAchenial(antonia)\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> Actable(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Actable(x) -> Base(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and Enforced(x) -> not Base(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) -> Beechen(x))\nEnforced(antonia) and Base(antonia) -> Achenial(antonia)\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Achenial(x) -> Liquid(x))\n\nAchenial(antonia)\n\ntherefore Achenial(antonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Lawrence is bitterish. Ellwood is recherche. Netty is bitterish. If something is civilian then it is unspoiled. All recherche, unspoiled things are bedridden. Furry, recherche things are not bedridden. All recherche things are civilian. If Netty is recherche and Netty is bedridden then Netty is bitterish. All recherche, bitterish things are fawning. Lawrence is not bitterish.", "logic": "\nBitterish(lawrence)\nRecherche(ellwood)\nBitterish(netty)\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Unspoiled(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) and Unspoiled(x) -> Bedridden(x))\nforall x (Analytical(x) and Recherche(x) -> not Bedridden(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Civilian(x))\nRecherche(netty) and Bedridden(netty) -> Bitterish(netty)\nforall x (Recherche(x) and Bitterish(x) -> Fawning(x))\n\nnot Bitterish(lawrence)\n\ntherefore Bitterish(lawrence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Cherri is bryophytic. Lenna is infuriated. Ethan is bryophytic. If something is cupular then it is disjoined. All infuriated, disjoined things are iridaceous. Furry, infuriated things are not iridaceous. All infuriated things are cupular. If Ethan is infuriated and Ethan is iridaceous then Ethan is bryophytic. All infuriated, bryophytic things are lined. Lenna is cupular.", "logic": "\nBryophytic(cherri)\nInfuriated(lenna)\nBryophytic(ethan)\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Disjoined(x) -> Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Pectineal(x) and Infuriated(x) -> not Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Infuriated(x) -> Cupular(x))\nInfuriated(ethan) and Iridaceous(ethan) -> Bryophytic(ethan)\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Bryophytic(x) -> Lined(x))\n\nCupular(lenna)\n\nInfuriated(lenna) and forall x (Infuriated(x) -> Cupular(x)) -> therefore Cupular(lenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Aile is quintuple. Oberon is globose. Jobey is quintuple. If something is misrelated then it is rigged. All globose, rigged things are astral. Furry, globose things are not astral. All globose things are misrelated. If Jobey is globose and Jobey is astral then Jobey is quintuple. All globose, quintuple things are rectal. Oberon is not misrelated.", "logic": "\nQuintuple(aile)\nGlobose(oberon)\nQuintuple(jobey)\nforall x (Misrelated(x) -> Rigged(x))\nforall x (Globose(x) and Rigged(x) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Bushy(x) and Globose(x) -> not Astral(x))\nforall x (Globose(x) -> Misrelated(x))\nGlobose(jobey) and Astral(jobey) -> Quintuple(jobey)\nforall x (Globose(x) and Quintuple(x) -> Rectal(x))\n\nnot Misrelated(oberon)\n\nGlobose(oberon) and forall x (Globose(x) -> Misrelated(x)) -> therefore Misrelated(oberon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Domenico is dizygotic. Russ is augitic. Bobina is dizygotic. If something is elective then it is swingeing. All augitic, swingeing things are unlucky. Furry, augitic things are not unlucky. All augitic things are elective. If Bobina is augitic and Bobina is unlucky then Bobina is dizygotic. All augitic, dizygotic things are dominant. Russ is swingeing.", "logic": "\nDizygotic(domenico)\nAugitic(russ)\nDizygotic(bobina)\nforall x (Elective(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) and Swingeing(x) -> Unlucky(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) and Augitic(x) -> not Unlucky(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Elective(x))\nAugitic(bobina) and Unlucky(bobina) -> Dizygotic(bobina)\nforall x (Augitic(x) and Dizygotic(x) -> Dominant(x))\n\nSwingeing(russ)\n\nAugitic(russ) and forall x (Augitic(x) -> Elective(x)) -> therefore Elective(russ) Elective(russ) and forall x (Elective(x) -> Swingeing(x)) -> therefore Swingeing(russ)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Tandie is ecumenical. Jenifer is breakable. Kathye is ecumenical. If something is etiolate then it is dilettante. All breakable, dilettante things are xviii. Furry, breakable things are not xviii. All breakable things are etiolate. If Kathye is breakable and Kathye is xviii then Kathye is ecumenical. All breakable, ecumenical things are statuesque. Jenifer is not dilettante.", "logic": "\nEcumenical(tandie)\nBreakable(jenifer)\nEcumenical(kathye)\nforall x (Etiolate(x) -> Dilettante(x))\nforall x (Breakable(x) and Dilettante(x) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Breakable(x) -> not Xviii(x))\nforall x (Breakable(x) -> Etiolate(x))\nBreakable(kathye) and Xviii(kathye) -> Ecumenical(kathye)\nforall x (Breakable(x) and Ecumenical(x) -> Statuesque(x))\n\nnot Dilettante(jenifer)\n\nBreakable(jenifer) and forall x (Breakable(x) -> Etiolate(x)) -> therefore Etiolate(jenifer) Etiolate(jenifer) and forall x (Etiolate(x) -> Dilettante(x)) -> therefore Dilettante(jenifer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Cyrus is circadian. Tricia is willing. Adrien is circadian. If something is moronic then it is ferine. All willing, ferine things are armillary. Furry, willing things are not armillary. All willing things are moronic. If Adrien is willing and Adrien is armillary then Adrien is circadian. All willing, circadian things are blocked. Tricia is armillary.", "logic": "\nCircadian(cyrus)\nWilling(tricia)\nCircadian(adrien)\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Ferine(x))\nforall x (Willing(x) and Ferine(x) -> Armillary(x))\nforall x (Rigid(x) and Willing(x) -> not Armillary(x))\nforall x (Willing(x) -> Moronic(x))\nWilling(adrien) and Armillary(adrien) -> Circadian(adrien)\nforall x (Willing(x) and Circadian(x) -> Blocked(x))\n\nArmillary(tricia)\n\nWilling(tricia) and forall x (Willing(x) -> Moronic(x)) -> therefore Moronic(tricia) Moronic(tricia) and forall x (Moronic(x) -> Ferine(x)) -> therefore Ferine(tricia) Willing(tricia) and Ferine(tricia) and forall x (Willing(x) and Ferine(x) -> Armillary(x)) -> therefore Armillary(tricia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Betteann is glossy. Duke is threadlike. Ulberto is glossy. If something is tinkly then it is homocyclic. All threadlike, homocyclic things are evaporated. Furry, threadlike things are not evaporated. All threadlike things are tinkly. If Ulberto is threadlike and Ulberto is evaporated then Ulberto is glossy. All threadlike, glossy things are macro. Duke is not evaporated.", "logic": "\nGlossy(betteann)\nThreadlike(duke)\nGlossy(ulberto)\nforall x (Tinkly(x) -> Homocyclic(x))\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and Homocyclic(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Stingy(x) and Threadlike(x) -> not Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Threadlike(x) -> Tinkly(x))\nThreadlike(ulberto) and Evaporated(ulberto) -> Glossy(ulberto)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and Glossy(x) -> Macro(x))\n\nnot Evaporated(duke)\n\nThreadlike(duke) and forall x (Threadlike(x) -> Tinkly(x)) -> therefore Tinkly(duke) Tinkly(duke) and forall x (Tinkly(x) -> Homocyclic(x)) -> therefore Homocyclic(duke) Threadlike(duke) and Homocyclic(duke) and forall x (Threadlike(x) and Homocyclic(x) -> Evaporated(x)) -> therefore Evaporated(duke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Von is bilobed. Leighton is bighearted. Aggi is bilobed. If something is forbidding then it is goosy. All bighearted, goosy things are folksy. Furry, bighearted things are not folksy. All bighearted things are forbidding. If Aggi is bighearted and Aggi is folksy then Aggi is bilobed. All bighearted, bilobed things are esthetic. Aggi is not forbidding.", "logic": "\nBilobed(von)\nBighearted(leighton)\nBilobed(aggi)\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Goosy(x) -> Folksy(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) and Bighearted(x) -> not Folksy(x))\nforall x (Bighearted(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nBighearted(aggi) and Folksy(aggi) -> Bilobed(aggi)\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Bilobed(x) -> Esthetic(x))\n\nnot Forbidding(aggi)\n\nforall x (Bighearted(x) -> Forbidding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Lezlie is intrusive. Lilian is nontaxable. Naoma is intrusive. If something is tortured then it is vested. All nontaxable, vested things are edged. Furry, nontaxable things are not edged. All nontaxable things are tortured. If Naoma is nontaxable and Naoma is edged then Naoma is intrusive. All nontaxable, intrusive things are glace. Lezlie is vested.", "logic": "\nIntrusive(lezlie)\nNontaxable(lilian)\nIntrusive(naoma)\nforall x (Tortured(x) -> Vested(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and Vested(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Inclined(x) and Nontaxable(x) -> not Edged(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) -> Tortured(x))\nNontaxable(naoma) and Edged(naoma) -> Intrusive(naoma)\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and Intrusive(x) -> Glace(x))\n\nVested(lezlie)\n\nforall x (Tortured(x) -> Vested(x)) <- forall x (Nontaxable(x) -> Tortured(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Dorotea is excellent. Valli is injurious. Dennie is excellent. If something is baffling then it is primo. All injurious, primo things are buttoned. Furry, injurious things are not buttoned. All injurious things are baffling. If Dennie is injurious and Dennie is buttoned then Dennie is excellent. All injurious, excellent things are thermionic. Dennie is not thermionic.", "logic": "\nExcellent(dorotea)\nInjurious(valli)\nExcellent(dennie)\nforall x (Baffling(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Injurious(x) and Primo(x) -> Buttoned(x))\nforall x (Pleading(x) and Injurious(x) -> not Buttoned(x))\nforall x (Injurious(x) -> Baffling(x))\nInjurious(dennie) and Buttoned(dennie) -> Excellent(dennie)\nforall x (Injurious(x) and Excellent(x) -> Thermionic(x))\n\nnot Thermionic(dennie)\n\nforall x (Injurious(x) and Excellent(x) -> Thermionic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Broderic is peaceful. Shaughn is courteous. Rey is peaceful. If something is made then it is lingulate. All courteous, lingulate things are haemolytic. Furry, courteous things are not haemolytic. All courteous things are made. If Rey is courteous and Rey is haemolytic then Rey is peaceful. All courteous, peaceful things are postpaid. Rey is haemolytic.", "logic": "\nPeaceful(broderic)\nCourteous(shaughn)\nPeaceful(rey)\nforall x (Made(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Courteous(x) and Lingulate(x) -> Haemolytic(x))\nforall x (Filipino(x) and Courteous(x) -> not Haemolytic(x))\nforall x (Courteous(x) -> Made(x))\nCourteous(rey) and Haemolytic(rey) -> Peaceful(rey)\nforall x (Courteous(x) and Peaceful(x) -> Postpaid(x))\n\nHaemolytic(rey)\n\nforall x (Courteous(x) and Lingulate(x) -> Haemolytic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Clint is dogging. Leonanie is geothermic. Chan is dogging. If something is bilocular then it is labile. All geothermic, labile things are marbled. Furry, geothermic things are not marbled. All geothermic things are bilocular. If Chan is geothermic and Chan is marbled then Chan is dogging. All geothermic, dogging things are unawed. Chan is not amoebic.", "logic": "\nDogging(clint)\nGeothermic(leonanie)\nDogging(chan)\nforall x (Bilocular(x) -> Labile(x))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) and Labile(x) -> Marbled(x))\nforall x (Amoebic(x) and Geothermic(x) -> not Marbled(x))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Bilocular(x))\nGeothermic(chan) and Marbled(chan) -> Dogging(chan)\nforall x (Geothermic(x) and Dogging(x) -> Unawed(x))\n\nnot Amoebic(chan)\n\nnot Amoebic(chan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Ulises is precooled. Lucien is obliged. Wojciech is precooled. If something is detractive then it is saccadic. All obliged, saccadic things are aquiline. Furry, obliged things are not aquiline. All obliged things are detractive. If Wojciech is obliged and Wojciech is aquiline then Wojciech is precooled. All obliged, precooled things are formidable. Wojciech is obliged.", "logic": "\nPrecooled(ulises)\nObliged(lucien)\nPrecooled(wojciech)\nforall x (Detractive(x) -> Saccadic(x))\nforall x (Obliged(x) and Saccadic(x) -> Aquiline(x))\nforall x (Pinched(x) and Obliged(x) -> not Aquiline(x))\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Detractive(x))\nObliged(wojciech) and Aquiline(wojciech) -> Precooled(wojciech)\nforall x (Obliged(x) and Precooled(x) -> Formidable(x))\n\nObliged(wojciech)\n\nObliged(wojciech) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Rosemonde is bellied. Carleen is childless. Calli is bellied. If something is tanned then it is stately. All childless, stately things are dehydrated. Furry, childless things are not dehydrated. All childless things are tanned. If Calli is childless and Calli is dehydrated then Calli is bellied. All childless, bellied things are bifoliate. Carleen is not curling.", "logic": "\nBellied(rosemonde)\nChildless(carleen)\nBellied(calli)\nforall x (Tanned(x) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) and Stately(x) -> Dehydrated(x))\nforall x (Curling(x) and Childless(x) -> not Dehydrated(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Tanned(x))\nChildless(calli) and Dehydrated(calli) -> Bellied(calli)\nforall x (Childless(x) and Bellied(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\n\nnot Curling(carleen)\n\nnot Curling(carleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Inessa is educated. Harri is vapourised. Ester is educated. If something is permeating then it is acceptable. All vapourised, acceptable things are repayable. Furry, vapourised things are not repayable. All vapourised things are permeating. If Ester is vapourised and Ester is repayable then Ester is educated. All vapourised, educated things are exculpated. Inessa is vapourised.", "logic": "\nEducated(inessa)\nVapourised(harri)\nEducated(ester)\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Repayable(x))\nforall x (Joint(x) and Vapourised(x) -> not Repayable(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Permeating(x))\nVapourised(ester) and Repayable(ester) -> Educated(ester)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Educated(x) -> Exculpated(x))\n\nVapourised(inessa)\n\nVapourised(inessa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Fulvia is hatched. Merola is narcotised. Susannah is upstanding. Oswell is not serial. If Oswell is voteless and Oswell is not upstanding then Oswell is narcotised. If someone is voteless then they are amethyst. All narcotised people are voteless. If Oswell is hatched and Oswell is not upstanding then Oswell is invalid. All hatched, invalid people are serial. All upstanding, narcotised people are invalid. If someone is hatched and not amethyst then they are invalid. All amethyst people are not invalid. Merola is narcotised.", "logic": "\nHatched(fulvia)\nNarcotised(merola)\nUpstanding(susannah)\nnot Serial(oswell)\nVoteless(oswell) and not Upstanding(oswell) -> Narcotised(oswell)\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nforall x (Narcotised(x) -> Voteless(x))\nHatched(oswell) and not Upstanding(oswell) -> Invalid(oswell)\nforall x (Hatched(x) and Invalid(x) -> Serial(x))\nforall x (Upstanding(x) and Narcotised(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Hatched(x) and not Amethyst(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Amethyst(x) -> not Invalid(x))\n\nNarcotised(merola)\n\ntherefore Narcotised(merola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Anja is sore. Markos is smashed. Freeman is leering. Aleecia is not bardic. If Aleecia is asthenic and Aleecia is not leering then Aleecia is smashed. If someone is asthenic then they are fruiting. All smashed people are asthenic. If Aleecia is sore and Aleecia is not leering then Aleecia is bullheaded. All sore, bullheaded people are bardic. All leering, smashed people are bullheaded. If someone is sore and not fruiting then they are bullheaded. All fruiting people are not bullheaded. Aleecia is bardic.", "logic": "\nSore(anja)\nSmashed(markos)\nLeering(freeman)\nnot Bardic(aleecia)\nAsthenic(aleecia) and not Leering(aleecia) -> Smashed(aleecia)\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Fruiting(x))\nforall x (Smashed(x) -> Asthenic(x))\nSore(aleecia) and not Leering(aleecia) -> Bullheaded(aleecia)\nforall x (Sore(x) and Bullheaded(x) -> Bardic(x))\nforall x (Leering(x) and Smashed(x) -> Bullheaded(x))\nforall x (Sore(x) and not Fruiting(x) -> Bullheaded(x))\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> not Bullheaded(x))\n\nBardic(aleecia)\n\ntherefore not Bardic(aleecia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Thatcher is cockeyed. Melinda is brunette. Naomi is posted. Zacherie is not soleless. If Zacherie is unsubtle and Zacherie is not posted then Zacherie is brunette. If someone is unsubtle then they are cynical. All brunette people are unsubtle. If Zacherie is cockeyed and Zacherie is not posted then Zacherie is inerrant. All cockeyed, inerrant people are soleless. All posted, brunette people are inerrant. If someone is cockeyed and not cynical then they are inerrant. All cynical people are not inerrant. Melinda is unsubtle.", "logic": "\nCockeyed(thatcher)\nBrunette(melinda)\nPosted(naomi)\nnot Soleless(zacherie)\nUnsubtle(zacherie) and not Posted(zacherie) -> Brunette(zacherie)\nforall x (Unsubtle(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\nCockeyed(zacherie) and not Posted(zacherie) -> Inerrant(zacherie)\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) and Inerrant(x) -> Soleless(x))\nforall x (Posted(x) and Brunette(x) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) and not Cynical(x) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Cynical(x) -> not Inerrant(x))\n\nUnsubtle(melinda)\n\nBrunette(melinda) and forall x (Brunette(x) -> Unsubtle(x)) -> therefore Unsubtle(melinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Kincaid is aspectual. Vick is septate. Leonora is designate. Carolee is not shintoist. If Carolee is overt and Carolee is not designate then Carolee is septate. If someone is overt then they are meddlesome. All septate people are overt. If Carolee is aspectual and Carolee is not designate then Carolee is pitchy. All aspectual, pitchy people are shintoist. All designate, septate people are pitchy. If someone is aspectual and not meddlesome then they are pitchy. All meddlesome people are not pitchy. Vick is not overt.", "logic": "\nAspectual(kincaid)\nSeptate(vick)\nDesignate(leonora)\nnot Shintoist(carolee)\nOvert(carolee) and not Designate(carolee) -> Septate(carolee)\nforall x (Overt(x) -> Meddlesome(x))\nforall x (Septate(x) -> Overt(x))\nAspectual(carolee) and not Designate(carolee) -> Pitchy(carolee)\nforall x (Aspectual(x) and Pitchy(x) -> Shintoist(x))\nforall x (Designate(x) and Septate(x) -> Pitchy(x))\nforall x (Aspectual(x) and not Meddlesome(x) -> Pitchy(x))\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) -> not Pitchy(x))\n\nnot Overt(vick)\n\nSeptate(vick) and forall x (Septate(x) -> Overt(x)) -> therefore Overt(vick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Deeann is nether. Dougie is savoury. Giorgio is obstetric. Kimberly is not authentic. If Kimberly is sagittal and Kimberly is not obstetric then Kimberly is savoury. If someone is sagittal then they are thematic. All savoury people are sagittal. If Kimberly is nether and Kimberly is not obstetric then Kimberly is treeless. All nether, treeless people are authentic. All obstetric, savoury people are treeless. If someone is nether and not thematic then they are treeless. All thematic people are not treeless. Dougie is thematic.", "logic": "\nNether(deeann)\nSavoury(dougie)\nObstetric(giorgio)\nnot Authentic(kimberly)\nSagittal(kimberly) and not Obstetric(kimberly) -> Savoury(kimberly)\nforall x (Sagittal(x) -> Thematic(x))\nforall x (Savoury(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nNether(kimberly) and not Obstetric(kimberly) -> Treeless(kimberly)\nforall x (Nether(x) and Treeless(x) -> Authentic(x))\nforall x (Obstetric(x) and Savoury(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Nether(x) and not Thematic(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Thematic(x) -> not Treeless(x))\n\nThematic(dougie)\n\nSavoury(dougie) and forall x (Savoury(x) -> Sagittal(x)) -> therefore Sagittal(dougie) Sagittal(dougie) and forall x (Sagittal(x) -> Thematic(x)) -> therefore Thematic(dougie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Jolene is orbiculate. Zonda is nonpolar. Arly is outward. Faythe is not chuffed. If Faythe is collateral and Faythe is not outward then Faythe is nonpolar. If someone is collateral then they are unsaddled. All nonpolar people are collateral. If Faythe is orbiculate and Faythe is not outward then Faythe is germinal. All orbiculate, germinal people are chuffed. All outward, nonpolar people are germinal. If someone is orbiculate and not unsaddled then they are germinal. All unsaddled people are not germinal. Zonda is not unsaddled.", "logic": "\nOrbiculate(jolene)\nNonpolar(zonda)\nOutward(arly)\nnot Chuffed(faythe)\nCollateral(faythe) and not Outward(faythe) -> Nonpolar(faythe)\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) -> Collateral(x))\nOrbiculate(faythe) and not Outward(faythe) -> Germinal(faythe)\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and Germinal(x) -> Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Outward(x) and Nonpolar(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and not Unsaddled(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> not Germinal(x))\n\nnot Unsaddled(zonda)\n\nNonpolar(zonda) and forall x (Nonpolar(x) -> Collateral(x)) -> therefore Collateral(zonda) Collateral(zonda) and forall x (Collateral(x) -> Unsaddled(x)) -> therefore Unsaddled(zonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Durand is coiled. Sancho is determined. Engelbart is dummy. Mickey is not recondite. If Mickey is bonnie and Mickey is not dummy then Mickey is determined. If someone is bonnie then they are inert. All determined people are bonnie. If Mickey is coiled and Mickey is not dummy then Mickey is reductive. All coiled, reductive people are recondite. All dummy, determined people are reductive. If someone is coiled and not inert then they are reductive. All inert people are not reductive. Sancho is not reductive.", "logic": "\nCoiled(durand)\nDetermined(sancho)\nDummy(engelbart)\nnot Recondite(mickey)\nBonnie(mickey) and not Dummy(mickey) -> Determined(mickey)\nforall x (Bonnie(x) -> Inert(x))\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Bonnie(x))\nCoiled(mickey) and not Dummy(mickey) -> Reductive(mickey)\nforall x (Coiled(x) and Reductive(x) -> Recondite(x))\nforall x (Dummy(x) and Determined(x) -> Reductive(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) and not Inert(x) -> Reductive(x))\nforall x (Inert(x) -> not Reductive(x))\n\nnot Reductive(sancho)\n\nDetermined(sancho) and forall x (Determined(x) -> Bonnie(x)) -> therefore Bonnie(sancho) Bonnie(sancho) and forall x (Bonnie(x) -> Inert(x)) -> therefore Inert(sancho) Inert(sancho) and forall x (Inert(x) -> not Reductive(x)) -> therefore not Reductive(sancho)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Raynard is lebanese. Michelle is operose. Bevvy is eleventh. Meagan is not infirm. If Meagan is motivated and Meagan is not eleventh then Meagan is operose. If someone is motivated then they are homoecious. All operose people are motivated. If Meagan is lebanese and Meagan is not eleventh then Meagan is unfeeling. All lebanese, unfeeling people are infirm. All eleventh, operose people are unfeeling. If someone is lebanese and not homoecious then they are unfeeling. All homoecious people are not unfeeling. Michelle is unfeeling.", "logic": "\nLebanese(raynard)\nOperose(michelle)\nEleventh(bevvy)\nnot Infirm(meagan)\nMotivated(meagan) and not Eleventh(meagan) -> Operose(meagan)\nforall x (Motivated(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Motivated(x))\nLebanese(meagan) and not Eleventh(meagan) -> Unfeeling(meagan)\nforall x (Lebanese(x) and Unfeeling(x) -> Infirm(x))\nforall x (Eleventh(x) and Operose(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Lebanese(x) and not Homoecious(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Homoecious(x) -> not Unfeeling(x))\n\nUnfeeling(michelle)\n\nOperose(michelle) and forall x (Operose(x) -> Motivated(x)) -> therefore Motivated(michelle) Motivated(michelle) and forall x (Motivated(x) -> Homoecious(x)) -> therefore Homoecious(michelle) Homoecious(michelle) and forall x (Homoecious(x) -> not Unfeeling(x)) -> therefore not Unfeeling(michelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Shaughn is uppity. Madelle is ivied. Audy is federate. Elaina is not bruising. If Elaina is unmapped and Elaina is not federate then Elaina is ivied. If someone is unmapped then they are anecdotic. All ivied people are unmapped. If Elaina is uppity and Elaina is not federate then Elaina is chlamydial. All uppity, chlamydial people are bruising. All federate, ivied people are chlamydial. If someone is uppity and not anecdotic then they are chlamydial. All anecdotic people are not chlamydial. Shaughn is not anecdotic.", "logic": "\nUppity(shaughn)\nIvied(madelle)\nFederate(audy)\nnot Bruising(elaina)\nUnmapped(elaina) and not Federate(elaina) -> Ivied(elaina)\nforall x (Unmapped(x) -> Anecdotic(x))\nforall x (Ivied(x) -> Unmapped(x))\nUppity(elaina) and not Federate(elaina) -> Chlamydial(elaina)\nforall x (Uppity(x) and Chlamydial(x) -> Bruising(x))\nforall x (Federate(x) and Ivied(x) -> Chlamydial(x))\nforall x (Uppity(x) and not Anecdotic(x) -> Chlamydial(x))\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) -> not Chlamydial(x))\n\nnot Anecdotic(shaughn)\n\nforall x (Unmapped(x) -> Anecdotic(x)) <- forall x (Ivied(x) -> Unmapped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Myna is bareback. Lianne is diverted. Karole is needed. Marianna is not decimal. If Marianna is eightfold and Marianna is not needed then Marianna is diverted. If someone is eightfold then they are malian. All diverted people are eightfold. If Marianna is bareback and Marianna is not needed then Marianna is renegade. All bareback, renegade people are decimal. All needed, diverted people are renegade. If someone is bareback and not malian then they are renegade. All malian people are not renegade. Myna is decimal.", "logic": "\nBareback(myna)\nDiverted(lianne)\nNeeded(karole)\nnot Decimal(marianna)\nEightfold(marianna) and not Needed(marianna) -> Diverted(marianna)\nforall x (Eightfold(x) -> Malian(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Eightfold(x))\nBareback(marianna) and not Needed(marianna) -> Renegade(marianna)\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Renegade(x) -> Decimal(x))\nforall x (Needed(x) and Diverted(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and not Malian(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Malian(x) -> not Renegade(x))\n\nDecimal(myna)\n\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Renegade(x) -> Decimal(x)) <- forall x (Needed(x) and Diverted(x) -> Renegade(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Horst is preventive. Raleigh is achromatic. Rebeca is inflexible. Steffi is not scorched. If Steffi is malposed and Steffi is not inflexible then Steffi is achromatic. If someone is malposed then they are clubby. All achromatic people are malposed. If Steffi is preventive and Steffi is not inflexible then Steffi is irrelevant. All preventive, irrelevant people are scorched. All inflexible, achromatic people are irrelevant. If someone is preventive and not clubby then they are irrelevant. All clubby people are not irrelevant. Rebeca is not irrelevant.", "logic": "\nPreventive(horst)\nAchromatic(raleigh)\nInflexible(rebeca)\nnot Scorched(steffi)\nMalposed(steffi) and not Inflexible(steffi) -> Achromatic(steffi)\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> Clubby(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Malposed(x))\nPreventive(steffi) and not Inflexible(steffi) -> Irrelevant(steffi)\nforall x (Preventive(x) and Irrelevant(x) -> Scorched(x))\nforall x (Inflexible(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) and not Clubby(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> not Irrelevant(x))\n\nnot Irrelevant(rebeca)\n\nforall x (Inflexible(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Irrelevant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Elvera is androgenic. Idaline is xlii. Jammie is centrist. Krysta is not shod. If Krysta is brindled and Krysta is not centrist then Krysta is xlii. If someone is brindled then they are tempting. All xlii people are brindled. If Krysta is androgenic and Krysta is not centrist then Krysta is fusible. All androgenic, fusible people are shod. All centrist, xlii people are fusible. If someone is androgenic and not tempting then they are fusible. All tempting people are not fusible. Elvera is fusible.", "logic": "\nAndrogenic(elvera)\nXlii(idaline)\nCentrist(jammie)\nnot Shod(krysta)\nBrindled(krysta) and not Centrist(krysta) -> Xlii(krysta)\nforall x (Brindled(x) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Brindled(x))\nAndrogenic(krysta) and not Centrist(krysta) -> Fusible(krysta)\nforall x (Androgenic(x) and Fusible(x) -> Shod(x))\nforall x (Centrist(x) and Xlii(x) -> Fusible(x))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) and not Tempting(x) -> Fusible(x))\nforall x (Tempting(x) -> not Fusible(x))\n\nFusible(elvera)\n\nforall x (Centrist(x) and Xlii(x) -> Fusible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Pepillo is tensed. Hector is punitive. Lynnett is unangry. Heda is not outraged. If Heda is pouchlike and Heda is not unangry then Heda is punitive. If someone is pouchlike then they are metric. All punitive people are pouchlike. If Heda is tensed and Heda is not unangry then Heda is inboard. All tensed, inboard people are outraged. All unangry, punitive people are inboard. If someone is tensed and not metric then they are inboard. All metric people are not inboard. Hector is not tensed.", "logic": "\nTensed(pepillo)\nPunitive(hector)\nUnangry(lynnett)\nnot Outraged(heda)\nPouchlike(heda) and not Unangry(heda) -> Punitive(heda)\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Punitive(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nTensed(heda) and not Unangry(heda) -> Inboard(heda)\nforall x (Tensed(x) and Inboard(x) -> Outraged(x))\nforall x (Unangry(x) and Punitive(x) -> Inboard(x))\nforall x (Tensed(x) and not Metric(x) -> Inboard(x))\nforall x (Metric(x) -> not Inboard(x))\n\nnot Tensed(hector)\n\nnot Tensed(hector) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Charline is foliaceous. Tommie is unshaken. Meridel is variegated. Terrence is not wintery. If Terrence is cretinous and Terrence is not variegated then Terrence is unshaken. If someone is cretinous then they are medullary. All unshaken people are cretinous. If Terrence is foliaceous and Terrence is not variegated then Terrence is worsening. All foliaceous, worsening people are wintery. All variegated, unshaken people are worsening. If someone is foliaceous and not medullary then they are worsening. All medullary people are not worsening. Charline is unshaken.", "logic": "\nFoliaceous(charline)\nUnshaken(tommie)\nVariegated(meridel)\nnot Wintery(terrence)\nCretinous(terrence) and not Variegated(terrence) -> Unshaken(terrence)\nforall x (Cretinous(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) -> Cretinous(x))\nFoliaceous(terrence) and not Variegated(terrence) -> Worsening(terrence)\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) and Worsening(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Unshaken(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) and not Medullary(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) -> not Worsening(x))\n\nUnshaken(charline)\n\nUnshaken(charline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Garrot is audile. Noella is antonymous. Francis is ahead. Amalita is not seedy. If Amalita is prominent and Amalita is not ahead then Amalita is antonymous. If someone is prominent then they are globular. All antonymous people are prominent. If Amalita is audile and Amalita is not ahead then Amalita is verbal. All audile, verbal people are seedy. All ahead, antonymous people are verbal. If someone is audile and not globular then they are verbal. All globular people are not verbal. Francis is not audile.", "logic": "\nAudile(garrot)\nAntonymous(noella)\nAhead(francis)\nnot Seedy(amalita)\nProminent(amalita) and not Ahead(amalita) -> Antonymous(amalita)\nforall x (Prominent(x) -> Globular(x))\nforall x (Antonymous(x) -> Prominent(x))\nAudile(amalita) and not Ahead(amalita) -> Verbal(amalita)\nforall x (Audile(x) and Verbal(x) -> Seedy(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) and Antonymous(x) -> Verbal(x))\nforall x (Audile(x) and not Globular(x) -> Verbal(x))\nforall x (Globular(x) -> not Verbal(x))\n\nnot Audile(francis)\n\nnot Audile(francis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Helen is nonpolar. Glenn is unborn. Jessi is hastate. Stella is not foolhardy. If Stella is mammary and Stella is not hastate then Stella is unborn. If someone is mammary then they are allied. All unborn people are mammary. If Stella is nonpolar and Stella is not hastate then Stella is cavalier. All nonpolar, cavalier people are foolhardy. All hastate, unborn people are cavalier. If someone is nonpolar and not allied then they are cavalier. All allied people are not cavalier. Helen is hastate.", "logic": "\nNonpolar(helen)\nUnborn(glenn)\nHastate(jessi)\nnot Foolhardy(stella)\nMammary(stella) and not Hastate(stella) -> Unborn(stella)\nforall x (Mammary(x) -> Allied(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) -> Mammary(x))\nNonpolar(stella) and not Hastate(stella) -> Cavalier(stella)\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) and Cavalier(x) -> Foolhardy(x))\nforall x (Hastate(x) and Unborn(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) and not Allied(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Allied(x) -> not Cavalier(x))\n\nHastate(helen)\n\nHastate(helen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Aurel is deafened. Laurance is swiss. Shanta is regimented. All labeled things are alkahestic. Young things are labeled. All alkahestic, labeled things are slapdash. If something is swiss and alkahestic then it is labeled. White, deafened things are slapdash. If Shanta is labeled and Shanta is slapdash then Shanta is preachy. Laurance is swiss.", "logic": "\nDeafened(aurel)\nSwiss(laurance)\nRegimented(shanta)\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Alkahestic(x))\nforall x (Swiss(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) and Labeled(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Swiss(x) and Alkahestic(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Preachy(x) and Deafened(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nLabeled(shanta) and Slapdash(shanta) -> Preachy(shanta)\n\nSwiss(laurance)\n\ntherefore Swiss(laurance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Estell is promissory. Hans is carbolated. Heinrich is nonbearing. All shortened things are aspherical. Young things are shortened. All aspherical, shortened things are respective. If something is carbolated and aspherical then it is shortened. White, promissory things are respective. If Heinrich is shortened and Heinrich is respective then Heinrich is entire. Estell is not promissory.", "logic": "\nPromissory(estell)\nCarbolated(hans)\nNonbearing(heinrich)\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Aspherical(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Aspherical(x) and Shortened(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) and Aspherical(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Entire(x) and Promissory(x) -> Respective(x))\nShortened(heinrich) and Respective(heinrich) -> Entire(heinrich)\n\nnot Promissory(estell)\n\ntherefore Promissory(estell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Emmeline is disabling. Weston is oceangoing. Matthaeus is unopposed. All overcast things are broad. Young things are overcast. All broad, overcast things are edified. If something is oceangoing and broad then it is overcast. White, disabling things are edified. If Matthaeus is overcast and Matthaeus is edified then Matthaeus is gruelling. Weston is overcast.", "logic": "\nDisabling(emmeline)\nOceangoing(weston)\nUnopposed(matthaeus)\nforall x (Overcast(x) -> Broad(x))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) and Overcast(x) -> Edified(x))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) and Broad(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and Disabling(x) -> Edified(x))\nOvercast(matthaeus) and Edified(matthaeus) -> Gruelling(matthaeus)\n\nOvercast(weston)\n\nOceangoing(weston) and forall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Overcast(x)) -> therefore Overcast(weston)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Percy is ironshod. Alonzo is dominant. Major is mutable. All pedagogic things are scythian. Young things are pedagogic. All scythian, pedagogic things are dendroid. If something is dominant and scythian then it is pedagogic. White, ironshod things are dendroid. If Major is pedagogic and Major is dendroid then Major is detachable. Alonzo is not pedagogic.", "logic": "\nIronshod(percy)\nDominant(alonzo)\nMutable(major)\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Scythian(x))\nforall x (Dominant(x) -> Pedagogic(x))\nforall x (Scythian(x) and Pedagogic(x) -> Dendroid(x))\nforall x (Dominant(x) and Scythian(x) -> Pedagogic(x))\nforall x (Detachable(x) and Ironshod(x) -> Dendroid(x))\nPedagogic(major) and Dendroid(major) -> Detachable(major)\n\nnot Pedagogic(alonzo)\n\nDominant(alonzo) and forall x (Dominant(x) -> Pedagogic(x)) -> therefore Pedagogic(alonzo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Siffre is toeless. Terrie is adjunct. Hercules is barelegged. All logy things are imputable. Young things are logy. All imputable, logy things are partible. If something is adjunct and imputable then it is logy. White, toeless things are partible. If Hercules is logy and Hercules is partible then Hercules is taloned. Terrie is imputable.", "logic": "\nToeless(siffre)\nAdjunct(terrie)\nBarelegged(hercules)\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Imputable(x))\nforall x (Adjunct(x) -> Logy(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Logy(x) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Adjunct(x) and Imputable(x) -> Logy(x))\nforall x (Taloned(x) and Toeless(x) -> Partible(x))\nLogy(hercules) and Partible(hercules) -> Taloned(hercules)\n\nImputable(terrie)\n\nAdjunct(terrie) and forall x (Adjunct(x) -> Logy(x)) -> therefore Logy(terrie) Logy(terrie) and forall x (Logy(x) -> Imputable(x)) -> therefore Imputable(terrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Brea is cuspidate. Barrie is egoistic. Chrisy is somber. All insatiable things are cordless. Young things are insatiable. All cordless, insatiable things are oaten. If something is egoistic and cordless then it is insatiable. White, cuspidate things are oaten. If Chrisy is insatiable and Chrisy is oaten then Chrisy is spiritous. Barrie is not cordless.", "logic": "\nCuspidate(brea)\nEgoistic(barrie)\nSomber(chrisy)\nforall x (Insatiable(x) -> Cordless(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Cordless(x) and Insatiable(x) -> Oaten(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) and Cordless(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Spiritous(x) and Cuspidate(x) -> Oaten(x))\nInsatiable(chrisy) and Oaten(chrisy) -> Spiritous(chrisy)\n\nnot Cordless(barrie)\n\nEgoistic(barrie) and forall x (Egoistic(x) -> Insatiable(x)) -> therefore Insatiable(barrie) Insatiable(barrie) and forall x (Insatiable(x) -> Cordless(x)) -> therefore Cordless(barrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Jermayne is stannous. Janka is corporeal. Zollie is noisy. All wingless things are washable. Young things are wingless. All washable, wingless things are uppercase. If something is corporeal and washable then it is wingless. White, stannous things are uppercase. If Zollie is wingless and Zollie is uppercase then Zollie is less. Janka is uppercase.", "logic": "\nStannous(jermayne)\nCorporeal(janka)\nNoisy(zollie)\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Washable(x))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) -> Wingless(x))\nforall x (Washable(x) and Wingless(x) -> Uppercase(x))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) and Washable(x) -> Wingless(x))\nforall x (Less(x) and Stannous(x) -> Uppercase(x))\nWingless(zollie) and Uppercase(zollie) -> Less(zollie)\n\nUppercase(janka)\n\nCorporeal(janka) and forall x (Corporeal(x) -> Wingless(x)) -> therefore Wingless(janka) Wingless(janka) and forall x (Wingless(x) -> Washable(x)) -> therefore Washable(janka) Corporeal(janka) and forall x (Corporeal(x) -> Wingless(x)) -> therefore Wingless(janka) Washable(janka) and Wingless(janka) and forall x (Washable(x) and Wingless(x) -> Uppercase(x)) -> therefore Uppercase(janka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Annabela is grubby. Ethelin is woeful. Raina is agrypnotic. All carroty things are enchained. Young things are carroty. All enchained, carroty things are ostensible. If something is woeful and enchained then it is carroty. White, grubby things are ostensible. If Raina is carroty and Raina is ostensible then Raina is empurpled. Ethelin is not ostensible.", "logic": "\nGrubby(annabela)\nWoeful(ethelin)\nAgrypnotic(raina)\nforall x (Carroty(x) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Woeful(x) -> Carroty(x))\nforall x (Enchained(x) and Carroty(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Woeful(x) and Enchained(x) -> Carroty(x))\nforall x (Empurpled(x) and Grubby(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nCarroty(raina) and Ostensible(raina) -> Empurpled(raina)\n\nnot Ostensible(ethelin)\n\nWoeful(ethelin) and forall x (Woeful(x) -> Carroty(x)) -> therefore Carroty(ethelin) Carroty(ethelin) and forall x (Carroty(x) -> Enchained(x)) -> therefore Enchained(ethelin) Woeful(ethelin) and forall x (Woeful(x) -> Carroty(x)) -> therefore Carroty(ethelin) Enchained(ethelin) and Carroty(ethelin) and forall x (Enchained(x) and Carroty(x) -> Ostensible(x)) -> therefore Ostensible(ethelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Marris is raunchy. Norene is peerless. Zebulen is upcountry. All avoidable things are moated. Young things are avoidable. All moated, avoidable things are dextrous. If something is peerless and moated then it is avoidable. White, raunchy things are dextrous. If Zebulen is avoidable and Zebulen is dextrous then Zebulen is secular. Zebulen is not dextrous.", "logic": "\nRaunchy(marris)\nPeerless(norene)\nUpcountry(zebulen)\nforall x (Avoidable(x) -> Moated(x))\nforall x (Peerless(x) -> Avoidable(x))\nforall x (Moated(x) and Avoidable(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Peerless(x) and Moated(x) -> Avoidable(x))\nforall x (Secular(x) and Raunchy(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nAvoidable(zebulen) and Dextrous(zebulen) -> Secular(zebulen)\n\nnot Dextrous(zebulen)\n\nforall x (Moated(x) and Avoidable(x) -> Dextrous(x)) <- forall x (Peerless(x) -> Avoidable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Dede is donnian. Ximenes is eponymic. Consolata is euphonical. All lasting things are plodding. Young things are lasting. All plodding, lasting things are intrepid. If something is eponymic and plodding then it is lasting. White, donnian things are intrepid. If Consolata is lasting and Consolata is intrepid then Consolata is tweedy. Dede is intrepid.", "logic": "\nDonnian(dede)\nEponymic(ximenes)\nEuphonical(consolata)\nforall x (Lasting(x) -> Plodding(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) -> Lasting(x))\nforall x (Plodding(x) and Lasting(x) -> Intrepid(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and Plodding(x) -> Lasting(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Donnian(x) -> Intrepid(x))\nLasting(consolata) and Intrepid(consolata) -> Tweedy(consolata)\n\nIntrepid(dede)\n\nforall x (Plodding(x) and Lasting(x) -> Intrepid(x)) <- forall x (Eponymic(x) -> Lasting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Lizbeth is anaemic. Stormie is crispate. Marlon is australian. All understood things are donnian. Young things are understood. All donnian, understood things are draped. If something is crispate and donnian then it is understood. White, anaemic things are draped. If Marlon is understood and Marlon is draped then Marlon is portrayed. Marlon is not understood.", "logic": "\nAnaemic(lizbeth)\nCrispate(stormie)\nAustralian(marlon)\nforall x (Understood(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) -> Understood(x))\nforall x (Donnian(x) and Understood(x) -> Draped(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) and Donnian(x) -> Understood(x))\nforall x (Portrayed(x) and Anaemic(x) -> Draped(x))\nUnderstood(marlon) and Draped(marlon) -> Portrayed(marlon)\n\nnot Understood(marlon)\n\nforall x (Crispate(x) -> Understood(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Amory is dishy. Marianne is electrical. Deva is biblical. All lipless things are inheriting. Young things are lipless. All inheriting, lipless things are lascivious. If something is electrical and inheriting then it is lipless. White, dishy things are lascivious. If Deva is lipless and Deva is lascivious then Deva is overheated. Deva is overheated.", "logic": "\nDishy(amory)\nElectrical(marianne)\nBiblical(deva)\nforall x (Lipless(x) -> Inheriting(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) -> Lipless(x))\nforall x (Inheriting(x) and Lipless(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) and Inheriting(x) -> Lipless(x))\nforall x (Overheated(x) and Dishy(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nLipless(deva) and Lascivious(deva) -> Overheated(deva)\n\nOverheated(deva)\n\nLipless(deva) and Lascivious(deva) -> Overheated(deva) <- forall x (Electrical(x) -> Lipless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Caria is nonelected. Renata is busy. Therine is unbraced. All palatine things are demonic. Young things are palatine. All demonic, palatine things are sulphuric. If something is busy and demonic then it is palatine. White, nonelected things are sulphuric. If Therine is palatine and Therine is sulphuric then Therine is jungian. Therine is not nonelected.", "logic": "\nNonelected(caria)\nBusy(renata)\nUnbraced(therine)\nforall x (Palatine(x) -> Demonic(x))\nforall x (Busy(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Demonic(x) and Palatine(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Busy(x) and Demonic(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Jungian(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nPalatine(therine) and Sulphuric(therine) -> Jungian(therine)\n\nnot Nonelected(therine)\n\nnot Nonelected(therine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Noellyn is fizzy. Tootsie is fantastic. Edithe is frightened. All port things are dastardly. Young things are port. All dastardly, port things are skeptical. If something is fantastic and dastardly then it is port. White, fizzy things are skeptical. If Edithe is port and Edithe is skeptical then Edithe is digressive. Edithe is fantastic.", "logic": "\nFizzy(noellyn)\nFantastic(tootsie)\nFrightened(edithe)\nforall x (Port(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) -> Port(x))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) and Port(x) -> Skeptical(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) and Dastardly(x) -> Port(x))\nforall x (Digressive(x) and Fizzy(x) -> Skeptical(x))\nPort(edithe) and Skeptical(edithe) -> Digressive(edithe)\n\nFantastic(edithe)\n\nFantastic(edithe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Andy is festal. Murielle is unhardened. Caro is anal. All keynesian things are leering. Young things are keynesian. All leering, keynesian things are bastard. If something is unhardened and leering then it is keynesian. White, festal things are bastard. If Caro is keynesian and Caro is bastard then Caro is marmorean. Andy is not unhardened.", "logic": "\nFestal(andy)\nUnhardened(murielle)\nAnal(caro)\nforall x (Keynesian(x) -> Leering(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Keynesian(x))\nforall x (Leering(x) and Keynesian(x) -> Bastard(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) and Leering(x) -> Keynesian(x))\nforall x (Marmorean(x) and Festal(x) -> Bastard(x))\nKeynesian(caro) and Bastard(caro) -> Marmorean(caro)\n\nnot Unhardened(andy)\n\nnot Unhardened(andy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Roda is unreal. Perry is canine. Mikael is bungled. All asserted things are emboldened. Young things are asserted. All emboldened, asserted things are teal. If something is canine and emboldened then it is asserted. White, unreal things are teal. If Mikael is asserted and Mikael is teal then Mikael is shakedown. Roda is shakedown.", "logic": "\nUnreal(roda)\nCanine(perry)\nBungled(mikael)\nforall x (Asserted(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Asserted(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and Asserted(x) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) and Emboldened(x) -> Asserted(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) and Unreal(x) -> Teal(x))\nAsserted(mikael) and Teal(mikael) -> Shakedown(mikael)\n\nShakedown(roda)\n\nShakedown(roda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "The marney is defeasible. The marney is hebraical. The marney is not sunken. The marney does not need the vick. The terrel preserve the marney. The vick is not hebraical. The vick is not scaley. If something curry the vick then the vick biodegrade the marney. If something preserve the vick and the vick is scaley then it preserve the marney. If something biodegrade the terrel and it curry the terrel then it is not eighty. If something biodegrade the marney then it biodegrade the terrel. If something preserve the marney then it curry the vick. If something is sunken then it does not visit the vick. The vick is not scaley.", "logic": "\nDefeasible(marney)\nHebraical(marney)\nnot Sunken(marney)\nnot Biodegrade(marney, vick)\nPreserve(terrel, marney)\nnot Hebraical(vick)\nnot Scaley(vick)\nforall x (Curry(x, vick) -> Biodegrade(vick, marney))\nforall x (Preserve(x, vick) and Scaley(vick) -> Preserve(x, marney))\nforall x (Biodegrade(x, terrel) and Curry(x, terrel) -> not Eighty(x))\nforall x (Biodegrade(x, marney) -> Biodegrade(x, terrel))\nforall x (Preserve(x, marney) -> Curry(x, vick))\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> not Preserve(x, vick))\n\nnot Scaley(vick)\n\ntherefore not Scaley(vick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The alston is echoic. The alston is utility. The alston is not compelling. The alston does not need the lisha. The lurline sovietize the alston. The lisha is not utility. The lisha is not squatty. If something halter the lisha then the lisha sandpaper the alston. If something sovietize the lisha and the lisha is squatty then it sovietize the alston. If something sandpaper the lurline and it halter the lurline then it is not unfettered. If something sandpaper the alston then it sandpaper the lurline. If something sovietize the alston then it halter the lisha. If something is compelling then it does not visit the lisha. The alston is not utility.", "logic": "\nEchoic(alston)\nUtility(alston)\nnot Compelling(alston)\nnot Sandpaper(alston, lisha)\nSovietize(lurline, alston)\nnot Utility(lisha)\nnot Squatty(lisha)\nforall x (Halter(x, lisha) -> Sandpaper(lisha, alston))\nforall x (Sovietize(x, lisha) and Squatty(lisha) -> Sovietize(x, alston))\nforall x (Sandpaper(x, lurline) and Halter(x, lurline) -> not Unfettered(x))\nforall x (Sandpaper(x, alston) -> Sandpaper(x, lurline))\nforall x (Sovietize(x, alston) -> Halter(x, lisha))\nforall x (Compelling(x) -> not Sovietize(x, lisha))\n\nnot Utility(alston)\n\ntherefore Utility(alston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The kattie is insolvable. The kattie is pained. The kattie is not deskbound. The kattie does not need the ashely. The ondrea gluttonize the kattie. The ashely is not pained. The ashely is not humbled. If something handcraft the ashely then the ashely influence the kattie. If something gluttonize the ashely and the ashely is humbled then it gluttonize the kattie. If something influence the ondrea and it handcraft the ondrea then it is not articulary. If something influence the kattie then it influence the ondrea. If something gluttonize the kattie then it handcraft the ashely. If something is deskbound then it does not visit the ashely. The ondrea handcraft the ashely.", "logic": "\nInsolvable(kattie)\nPained(kattie)\nnot Deskbound(kattie)\nnot Influence(kattie, ashely)\nGluttonize(ondrea, kattie)\nnot Pained(ashely)\nnot Humbled(ashely)\nforall x (Handcraft(x, ashely) -> Influence(ashely, kattie))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, ashely) and Humbled(ashely) -> Gluttonize(x, kattie))\nforall x (Influence(x, ondrea) and Handcraft(x, ondrea) -> not Articulary(x))\nforall x (Influence(x, kattie) -> Influence(x, ondrea))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, kattie) -> Handcraft(x, ashely))\nforall x (Deskbound(x) -> not Gluttonize(x, ashely))\n\nHandcraft(ondrea, ashely)\n\nGluttonize(ondrea, kattie) and forall x (Gluttonize(x, kattie) -> Handcraft(x, ashely)) -> therefore Handcraft(ondrea, ashely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The nicky is uniformed. The nicky is mesophytic. The nicky is not myopic. The nicky does not need the arabela. The marne rebel the nicky. The arabela is not mesophytic. The arabela is not sewn. If something berate the arabela then the arabela furlough the nicky. If something rebel the arabela and the arabela is sewn then it rebel the nicky. If something furlough the marne and it berate the marne then it is not dialectal. If something furlough the nicky then it furlough the marne. If something rebel the nicky then it berate the arabela. If something is myopic then it does not visit the arabela. The marne does not see the arabela.", "logic": "\nUniformed(nicky)\nMesophytic(nicky)\nnot Myopic(nicky)\nnot Furlough(nicky, arabela)\nRebel(marne, nicky)\nnot Mesophytic(arabela)\nnot Sewn(arabela)\nforall x (Berate(x, arabela) -> Furlough(arabela, nicky))\nforall x (Rebel(x, arabela) and Sewn(arabela) -> Rebel(x, nicky))\nforall x (Furlough(x, marne) and Berate(x, marne) -> not Dialectal(x))\nforall x (Furlough(x, nicky) -> Furlough(x, marne))\nforall x (Rebel(x, nicky) -> Berate(x, arabela))\nforall x (Myopic(x) -> not Rebel(x, arabela))\n\nnot Berate(marne, arabela)\n\nRebel(marne, nicky) and forall x (Rebel(x, nicky) -> Berate(x, arabela)) -> therefore Berate(marne, arabela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The keefe is rooted. The keefe is overdone. The keefe is not unassigned. The keefe does not need the jess. The garnette predict the keefe. The jess is not overdone. The jess is not plantar. If something labialise the jess then the jess souse the keefe. If something predict the jess and the jess is plantar then it predict the keefe. If something souse the garnette and it labialise the garnette then it is not waggish. If something souse the keefe then it souse the garnette. If something predict the keefe then it labialise the jess. If something is unassigned then it does not visit the jess. The jess souse the keefe.", "logic": "\nRooted(keefe)\nOverdone(keefe)\nnot Unassigned(keefe)\nnot Souse(keefe, jess)\nPredict(garnette, keefe)\nnot Overdone(jess)\nnot Plantar(jess)\nforall x (Labialise(x, jess) -> Souse(jess, keefe))\nforall x (Predict(x, jess) and Plantar(jess) -> Predict(x, keefe))\nforall x (Souse(x, garnette) and Labialise(x, garnette) -> not Waggish(x))\nforall x (Souse(x, keefe) -> Souse(x, garnette))\nforall x (Predict(x, keefe) -> Labialise(x, jess))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> not Predict(x, jess))\n\nSouse(jess, keefe)\n\nPredict(garnette, keefe) and forall x (Predict(x, keefe) -> Labialise(x, jess)) -> therefore Labialise(garnette, jess) Labialise(garnette, jess) and forall x (Labialise(x, jess) -> Souse(jess, keefe)) -> therefore Souse(jess, keefe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The chandler is lathery. The chandler is untufted. The chandler is not afflicted. The chandler does not need the vivianne. The thedric readapt the chandler. The vivianne is not untufted. The vivianne is not biting. If something staunch the vivianne then the vivianne campaign the chandler. If something readapt the vivianne and the vivianne is biting then it readapt the chandler. If something campaign the thedric and it staunch the thedric then it is not probable. If something campaign the chandler then it campaign the thedric. If something readapt the chandler then it staunch the vivianne. If something is afflicted then it does not visit the vivianne. The vivianne does not need the chandler.", "logic": "\nLathery(chandler)\nUntufted(chandler)\nnot Afflicted(chandler)\nnot Campaign(chandler, vivianne)\nReadapt(thedric, chandler)\nnot Untufted(vivianne)\nnot Biting(vivianne)\nforall x (Staunch(x, vivianne) -> Campaign(vivianne, chandler))\nforall x (Readapt(x, vivianne) and Biting(vivianne) -> Readapt(x, chandler))\nforall x (Campaign(x, thedric) and Staunch(x, thedric) -> not Probable(x))\nforall x (Campaign(x, chandler) -> Campaign(x, thedric))\nforall x (Readapt(x, chandler) -> Staunch(x, vivianne))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> not Readapt(x, vivianne))\n\nnot Campaign(vivianne, chandler)\n\nReadapt(thedric, chandler) and forall x (Readapt(x, chandler) -> Staunch(x, vivianne)) -> therefore Staunch(thedric, vivianne) Staunch(thedric, vivianne) and forall x (Staunch(x, vivianne) -> Campaign(vivianne, chandler)) -> therefore Campaign(vivianne, chandler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The filipe is ruttish. The filipe is cooked. The filipe is not ovate. The filipe does not need the bettye. The fae slake the filipe. The bettye is not cooked. The bettye is not pianissimo. If something civilize the bettye then the bettye liken the filipe. If something slake the bettye and the bettye is pianissimo then it slake the filipe. If something liken the fae and it civilize the fae then it is not britannic. If something liken the filipe then it liken the fae. If something slake the filipe then it civilize the bettye. If something is ovate then it does not visit the bettye. The bettye liken the fae.", "logic": "\nRuttish(filipe)\nCooked(filipe)\nnot Ovate(filipe)\nnot Liken(filipe, bettye)\nSlake(fae, filipe)\nnot Cooked(bettye)\nnot Pianissimo(bettye)\nforall x (Civilize(x, bettye) -> Liken(bettye, filipe))\nforall x (Slake(x, bettye) and Pianissimo(bettye) -> Slake(x, filipe))\nforall x (Liken(x, fae) and Civilize(x, fae) -> not Britannic(x))\nforall x (Liken(x, filipe) -> Liken(x, fae))\nforall x (Slake(x, filipe) -> Civilize(x, bettye))\nforall x (Ovate(x) -> not Slake(x, bettye))\n\nLiken(bettye, fae)\n\nSlake(fae, filipe) and forall x (Slake(x, filipe) -> Civilize(x, bettye)) -> therefore Civilize(fae, bettye) Civilize(fae, bettye) and forall x (Civilize(x, bettye) -> Liken(bettye, filipe)) -> therefore Liken(bettye, filipe) Liken(bettye, filipe) and forall x (Liken(x, filipe) -> Liken(x, fae)) -> therefore Liken(bettye, fae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The sioux is expressive. The sioux is respectful. The sioux is not jesuitic. The sioux does not need the samuele. The datha report the sioux. The samuele is not respectful. The samuele is not separable. If something accent the samuele then the samuele reboot the sioux. If something report the samuele and the samuele is separable then it report the sioux. If something reboot the datha and it accent the datha then it is not actable. If something reboot the sioux then it reboot the datha. If something report the sioux then it accent the samuele. If something is jesuitic then it does not visit the samuele. The samuele does not need the datha.", "logic": "\nExpressive(sioux)\nRespectful(sioux)\nnot Jesuitic(sioux)\nnot Reboot(sioux, samuele)\nReport(datha, sioux)\nnot Respectful(samuele)\nnot Separable(samuele)\nforall x (Accent(x, samuele) -> Reboot(samuele, sioux))\nforall x (Report(x, samuele) and Separable(samuele) -> Report(x, sioux))\nforall x (Reboot(x, datha) and Accent(x, datha) -> not Actable(x))\nforall x (Reboot(x, sioux) -> Reboot(x, datha))\nforall x (Report(x, sioux) -> Accent(x, samuele))\nforall x (Jesuitic(x) -> not Report(x, samuele))\n\nnot Reboot(samuele, datha)\n\nReport(datha, sioux) and forall x (Report(x, sioux) -> Accent(x, samuele)) -> therefore Accent(datha, samuele) Accent(datha, samuele) and forall x (Accent(x, samuele) -> Reboot(samuele, sioux)) -> therefore Reboot(samuele, sioux) Reboot(samuele, sioux) and forall x (Reboot(x, sioux) -> Reboot(x, datha)) -> therefore Reboot(samuele, datha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The simon is analogical. The simon is attic. The simon is not semiotic. The simon does not need the alston. The emmit putter the simon. The alston is not attic. The alston is not friable. If something ritualize the alston then the alston bump the simon. If something putter the alston and the alston is friable then it putter the simon. If something bump the emmit and it ritualize the emmit then it is not lxxxiii. If something bump the simon then it bump the emmit. If something putter the simon then it ritualize the alston. If something is semiotic then it does not visit the alston. The alston does not visit the simon.", "logic": "\nAnalogical(simon)\nAttic(simon)\nnot Semiotic(simon)\nnot Bump(simon, alston)\nPutter(emmit, simon)\nnot Attic(alston)\nnot Friable(alston)\nforall x (Ritualize(x, alston) -> Bump(alston, simon))\nforall x (Putter(x, alston) and Friable(alston) -> Putter(x, simon))\nforall x (Bump(x, emmit) and Ritualize(x, emmit) -> not Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Bump(x, simon) -> Bump(x, emmit))\nforall x (Putter(x, simon) -> Ritualize(x, alston))\nforall x (Semiotic(x) -> not Putter(x, alston))\n\nnot Putter(alston, simon)\n\nforall x (Putter(x, alston) and Friable(alston) -> Putter(x, simon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The faunie is achenial. The faunie is morbific. The faunie is not tall. The faunie does not need the jacintha. The marquita foster the faunie. The jacintha is not morbific. The jacintha is not precursory. If something bide the jacintha then the jacintha blackball the faunie. If something foster the jacintha and the jacintha is precursory then it foster the faunie. If something blackball the marquita and it bide the marquita then it is not ruined. If something blackball the faunie then it blackball the marquita. If something foster the faunie then it bide the jacintha. If something is tall then it does not visit the jacintha. The faunie bide the jacintha.", "logic": "\nAchenial(faunie)\nMorbific(faunie)\nnot Tall(faunie)\nnot Blackball(faunie, jacintha)\nFoster(marquita, faunie)\nnot Morbific(jacintha)\nnot Precursory(jacintha)\nforall x (Bide(x, jacintha) -> Blackball(jacintha, faunie))\nforall x (Foster(x, jacintha) and Precursory(jacintha) -> Foster(x, faunie))\nforall x (Blackball(x, marquita) and Bide(x, marquita) -> not Ruined(x))\nforall x (Blackball(x, faunie) -> Blackball(x, marquita))\nforall x (Foster(x, faunie) -> Bide(x, jacintha))\nforall x (Tall(x) -> not Foster(x, jacintha))\n\nBide(faunie, jacintha)\n\nforall x (Foster(x, faunie) -> Bide(x, jacintha)) <- forall x (Foster(x, jacintha) and Precursory(jacintha) -> Foster(x, faunie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The nettle is gibbose. The nettle is dotted. The nettle is not ovarian. The nettle does not need the neila. The frazier platinize the nettle. The neila is not dotted. The neila is not quaternate. If something compel the neila then the neila sponge the nettle. If something platinize the neila and the neila is quaternate then it platinize the nettle. If something sponge the frazier and it compel the frazier then it is not pursued. If something sponge the nettle then it sponge the frazier. If something platinize the nettle then it compel the neila. If something is ovarian then it does not visit the neila. The nettle does not need the frazier.", "logic": "\nGibbose(nettle)\nDotted(nettle)\nnot Ovarian(nettle)\nnot Sponge(nettle, neila)\nPlatinize(frazier, nettle)\nnot Dotted(neila)\nnot Quaternate(neila)\nforall x (Compel(x, neila) -> Sponge(neila, nettle))\nforall x (Platinize(x, neila) and Quaternate(neila) -> Platinize(x, nettle))\nforall x (Sponge(x, frazier) and Compel(x, frazier) -> not Pursued(x))\nforall x (Sponge(x, nettle) -> Sponge(x, frazier))\nforall x (Platinize(x, nettle) -> Compel(x, neila))\nforall x (Ovarian(x) -> not Platinize(x, neila))\n\nnot Sponge(nettle, frazier)\n\nforall x (Sponge(x, nettle) -> Sponge(x, frazier)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The kattie is sandlike. The kattie is carolean. The kattie is not thumbed. The kattie does not need the caitrin. The geoffry bobble the kattie. The caitrin is not carolean. The caitrin is not lumpy. If something curl the caitrin then the caitrin localize the kattie. If something bobble the caitrin and the caitrin is lumpy then it bobble the kattie. If something localize the geoffry and it curl the geoffry then it is not neighborly. If something localize the kattie then it localize the geoffry. If something bobble the kattie then it curl the caitrin. If something is thumbed then it does not visit the caitrin. The kattie bobble the kattie.", "logic": "\nSandlike(kattie)\nCarolean(kattie)\nnot Thumbed(kattie)\nnot Localize(kattie, caitrin)\nBobble(geoffry, kattie)\nnot Carolean(caitrin)\nnot Lumpy(caitrin)\nforall x (Curl(x, caitrin) -> Localize(caitrin, kattie))\nforall x (Bobble(x, caitrin) and Lumpy(caitrin) -> Bobble(x, kattie))\nforall x (Localize(x, geoffry) and Curl(x, geoffry) -> not Neighborly(x))\nforall x (Localize(x, kattie) -> Localize(x, geoffry))\nforall x (Bobble(x, kattie) -> Curl(x, caitrin))\nforall x (Thumbed(x) -> not Bobble(x, caitrin))\n\nBobble(kattie, kattie)\n\nforall x (Bobble(x, caitrin) and Lumpy(caitrin) -> Bobble(x, kattie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The phineas is filiform. The phineas is zolaesque. The phineas is not forte. The phineas does not need the lauren. The darsie handcolor the phineas. The lauren is not zolaesque. The lauren is not workaday. If something blither the lauren then the lauren palatalise the phineas. If something handcolor the lauren and the lauren is workaday then it handcolor the phineas. If something palatalise the darsie and it blither the darsie then it is not curt. If something palatalise the phineas then it palatalise the darsie. If something handcolor the phineas then it blither the lauren. If something is forte then it does not visit the lauren. The darsie is not filiform.", "logic": "\nFiliform(phineas)\nZolaesque(phineas)\nnot Forte(phineas)\nnot Palatalise(phineas, lauren)\nHandcolor(darsie, phineas)\nnot Zolaesque(lauren)\nnot Workaday(lauren)\nforall x (Blither(x, lauren) -> Palatalise(lauren, phineas))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, lauren) and Workaday(lauren) -> Handcolor(x, phineas))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, darsie) and Blither(x, darsie) -> not Curt(x))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, phineas) -> Palatalise(x, darsie))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, phineas) -> Blither(x, lauren))\nforall x (Forte(x) -> not Handcolor(x, lauren))\n\nnot Filiform(darsie)\n\nnot Filiform(darsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The nelle is ideational. The nelle is forged. The nelle is not downhill. The nelle does not need the tish. The emilia carry the nelle. The tish is not forged. The tish is not remorseful. If something abet the tish then the tish amortise the nelle. If something carry the tish and the tish is remorseful then it carry the nelle. If something amortise the emilia and it abet the emilia then it is not satanic. If something amortise the nelle then it amortise the emilia. If something carry the nelle then it abet the tish. If something is downhill then it does not visit the tish. The emilia carry the emilia.", "logic": "\nIdeational(nelle)\nForged(nelle)\nnot Downhill(nelle)\nnot Amortise(nelle, tish)\nCarry(emilia, nelle)\nnot Forged(tish)\nnot Remorseful(tish)\nforall x (Abet(x, tish) -> Amortise(tish, nelle))\nforall x (Carry(x, tish) and Remorseful(tish) -> Carry(x, nelle))\nforall x (Amortise(x, emilia) and Abet(x, emilia) -> not Satanic(x))\nforall x (Amortise(x, nelle) -> Amortise(x, emilia))\nforall x (Carry(x, nelle) -> Abet(x, tish))\nforall x (Downhill(x) -> not Carry(x, tish))\n\nCarry(emilia, emilia)\n\nCarry(emilia, emilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The gusta is eventful. The gusta is reentrant. The gusta is not unexacting. The gusta does not need the tynan. The maxfield tittup the gusta. The tynan is not reentrant. The tynan is not chic. If something dock the tynan then the tynan dent the gusta. If something tittup the tynan and the tynan is chic then it tittup the gusta. If something dent the maxfield and it dock the maxfield then it is not liii. If something dent the gusta then it dent the maxfield. If something tittup the gusta then it dock the tynan. If something is unexacting then it does not visit the tynan. The maxfield does not need the tynan.", "logic": "\nEventful(gusta)\nReentrant(gusta)\nnot Unexacting(gusta)\nnot Dent(gusta, tynan)\nTittup(maxfield, gusta)\nnot Reentrant(tynan)\nnot Chic(tynan)\nforall x (Dock(x, tynan) -> Dent(tynan, gusta))\nforall x (Tittup(x, tynan) and Chic(tynan) -> Tittup(x, gusta))\nforall x (Dent(x, maxfield) and Dock(x, maxfield) -> not Liii(x))\nforall x (Dent(x, gusta) -> Dent(x, maxfield))\nforall x (Tittup(x, gusta) -> Dock(x, tynan))\nforall x (Unexacting(x) -> not Tittup(x, tynan))\n\nnot Dent(maxfield, tynan)\n\nnot Dent(maxfield, tynan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The bryant is bicornate. The bryant is cultivable. The bryant is not phenotypic. The bryant does not need the whittaker. The deva glisten the bryant. The whittaker is not cultivable. The whittaker is not antimonic. If something roughcast the whittaker then the whittaker fool the bryant. If something glisten the whittaker and the whittaker is antimonic then it glisten the bryant. If something fool the deva and it roughcast the deva then it is not overbusy. If something fool the bryant then it fool the deva. If something glisten the bryant then it roughcast the whittaker. If something is phenotypic then it does not visit the whittaker. The deva roughcast the bryant.", "logic": "\nBicornate(bryant)\nCultivable(bryant)\nnot Phenotypic(bryant)\nnot Fool(bryant, whittaker)\nGlisten(deva, bryant)\nnot Cultivable(whittaker)\nnot Antimonic(whittaker)\nforall x (Roughcast(x, whittaker) -> Fool(whittaker, bryant))\nforall x (Glisten(x, whittaker) and Antimonic(whittaker) -> Glisten(x, bryant))\nforall x (Fool(x, deva) and Roughcast(x, deva) -> not Overbusy(x))\nforall x (Fool(x, bryant) -> Fool(x, deva))\nforall x (Glisten(x, bryant) -> Roughcast(x, whittaker))\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) -> not Glisten(x, whittaker))\n\nRoughcast(deva, bryant)\n\nRoughcast(deva, bryant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The stacia reference the allis. The stacia is atonal. The stacia is oxonian. The allis is atonal. The allis is selfish. The allis is oxonian. The allis crunch the kelci. The allis amuse the stacia. The lorrie reference the stacia. The kelci is atonal. The kelci is selfish. The kelci is standby. If someone is selfish and they need the stacia then they see the kelci. If someone crunch the lorrie and they need the allis then they see the stacia. If someone is lemonlike then they need the allis. If someone crunch the lorrie then the lorrie is standby. If someone crunch the allis then the allis crunch the stacia. If someone is atonal and they eat the lorrie then the lorrie amuse the stacia. If someone crunch the stacia and they eat the lorrie then they are standby. If someone reference the stacia then they are lemonlike. The kelci is atonal.", "logic": "\nReference(stacia, allis)\nAtonal(stacia)\nOxonian(stacia)\nAtonal(allis)\nSelfish(allis)\nOxonian(allis)\nCrunch(allis, kelci)\nAmuse(allis, stacia)\nReference(lorrie, stacia)\nAtonal(kelci)\nSelfish(kelci)\nStandby(kelci)\nforall x (Selfish(x) and Crunch(x, stacia) -> Amuse(x, kelci))\nforall x (Crunch(x, lorrie) and Crunch(x, allis) -> Amuse(x, stacia))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Crunch(x, allis))\nforall x (Crunch(x, lorrie) -> Standby(lorrie))\nforall x (Crunch(x, allis) -> Crunch(allis, stacia))\nforall x (Atonal(x) and Reference(x, lorrie) -> Amuse(lorrie, stacia))\nforall x (Crunch(x, stacia) and Reference(x, lorrie) -> Standby(x))\nforall x (Reference(x, stacia) -> Lemonlike(x))\n\nAtonal(kelci)\n\ntherefore Atonal(kelci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The prasun abduce the horatio. The prasun is scholarly. The prasun is undirected. The horatio is scholarly. The horatio is eloquent. The horatio is undirected. The horatio offer the roderick. The horatio tense the prasun. The tina abduce the prasun. The roderick is scholarly. The roderick is eloquent. The roderick is profitless. If someone is eloquent and they need the prasun then they see the roderick. If someone offer the tina and they need the horatio then they see the prasun. If someone is winking then they need the horatio. If someone offer the tina then the tina is profitless. If someone offer the horatio then the horatio offer the prasun. If someone is scholarly and they eat the tina then the tina tense the prasun. If someone offer the prasun and they eat the tina then they are profitless. If someone abduce the prasun then they are winking. The prasun does not eat the horatio.", "logic": "\nAbduce(prasun, horatio)\nScholarly(prasun)\nUndirected(prasun)\nScholarly(horatio)\nEloquent(horatio)\nUndirected(horatio)\nOffer(horatio, roderick)\nTense(horatio, prasun)\nAbduce(tina, prasun)\nScholarly(roderick)\nEloquent(roderick)\nProfitless(roderick)\nforall x (Eloquent(x) and Offer(x, prasun) -> Tense(x, roderick))\nforall x (Offer(x, tina) and Offer(x, horatio) -> Tense(x, prasun))\nforall x (Winking(x) -> Offer(x, horatio))\nforall x (Offer(x, tina) -> Profitless(tina))\nforall x (Offer(x, horatio) -> Offer(horatio, prasun))\nforall x (Scholarly(x) and Abduce(x, tina) -> Tense(tina, prasun))\nforall x (Offer(x, prasun) and Abduce(x, tina) -> Profitless(x))\nforall x (Abduce(x, prasun) -> Winking(x))\n\nnot Abduce(prasun, horatio)\n\ntherefore Abduce(prasun, horatio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The ingram misspend the giffer. The ingram is papillose. The ingram is newfangled. The giffer is papillose. The giffer is unloved. The giffer is newfangled. The giffer infer the carter. The giffer deprecate the ingram. The trudey misspend the ingram. The carter is papillose. The carter is unloved. The carter is presumable. If someone is unloved and they need the ingram then they see the carter. If someone infer the trudey and they need the giffer then they see the ingram. If someone is distal then they need the giffer. If someone infer the trudey then the trudey is presumable. If someone infer the giffer then the giffer infer the ingram. If someone is papillose and they eat the trudey then the trudey deprecate the ingram. If someone infer the ingram and they eat the trudey then they are presumable. If someone misspend the ingram then they are distal. The trudey is distal.", "logic": "\nMisspend(ingram, giffer)\nPapillose(ingram)\nNewfangled(ingram)\nPapillose(giffer)\nUnloved(giffer)\nNewfangled(giffer)\nInfer(giffer, carter)\nDeprecate(giffer, ingram)\nMisspend(trudey, ingram)\nPapillose(carter)\nUnloved(carter)\nPresumable(carter)\nforall x (Unloved(x) and Infer(x, ingram) -> Deprecate(x, carter))\nforall x (Infer(x, trudey) and Infer(x, giffer) -> Deprecate(x, ingram))\nforall x (Distal(x) -> Infer(x, giffer))\nforall x (Infer(x, trudey) -> Presumable(trudey))\nforall x (Infer(x, giffer) -> Infer(giffer, ingram))\nforall x (Papillose(x) and Misspend(x, trudey) -> Deprecate(trudey, ingram))\nforall x (Infer(x, ingram) and Misspend(x, trudey) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Misspend(x, ingram) -> Distal(x))\n\nDistal(trudey)\n\nMisspend(trudey, ingram) and forall x (Misspend(x, ingram) -> Distal(x)) -> therefore Distal(trudey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The logan overjoy the waly. The logan is caecilian. The logan is unnoticed. The waly is caecilian. The waly is unalike. The waly is unnoticed. The waly experiment the chadwick. The waly resplend the logan. The tessi overjoy the logan. The chadwick is caecilian. The chadwick is unalike. The chadwick is deductible. If someone is unalike and they need the logan then they see the chadwick. If someone experiment the tessi and they need the waly then they see the logan. If someone is harrowing then they need the waly. If someone experiment the tessi then the tessi is deductible. If someone experiment the waly then the waly experiment the logan. If someone is caecilian and they eat the tessi then the tessi resplend the logan. If someone experiment the logan and they eat the tessi then they are deductible. If someone overjoy the logan then they are harrowing. The tessi is not harrowing.", "logic": "\nOverjoy(logan, waly)\nCaecilian(logan)\nUnnoticed(logan)\nCaecilian(waly)\nUnalike(waly)\nUnnoticed(waly)\nExperiment(waly, chadwick)\nResplend(waly, logan)\nOverjoy(tessi, logan)\nCaecilian(chadwick)\nUnalike(chadwick)\nDeductible(chadwick)\nforall x (Unalike(x) and Experiment(x, logan) -> Resplend(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Experiment(x, tessi) and Experiment(x, waly) -> Resplend(x, logan))\nforall x (Harrowing(x) -> Experiment(x, waly))\nforall x (Experiment(x, tessi) -> Deductible(tessi))\nforall x (Experiment(x, waly) -> Experiment(waly, logan))\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and Overjoy(x, tessi) -> Resplend(tessi, logan))\nforall x (Experiment(x, logan) and Overjoy(x, tessi) -> Deductible(x))\nforall x (Overjoy(x, logan) -> Harrowing(x))\n\nnot Harrowing(tessi)\n\nOverjoy(tessi, logan) and forall x (Overjoy(x, logan) -> Harrowing(x)) -> therefore Harrowing(tessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The lilyan eddy the farah. The lilyan is ponderable. The lilyan is mesmeric. The farah is ponderable. The farah is diarrhoeic. The farah is mesmeric. The farah cockle the nikkie. The farah crispen the lilyan. The charla eddy the lilyan. The nikkie is ponderable. The nikkie is diarrhoeic. The nikkie is diffused. If someone is diarrhoeic and they need the lilyan then they see the nikkie. If someone cockle the charla and they need the farah then they see the lilyan. If someone is forceless then they need the farah. If someone cockle the charla then the charla is diffused. If someone cockle the farah then the farah cockle the lilyan. If someone is ponderable and they eat the charla then the charla crispen the lilyan. If someone cockle the lilyan and they eat the charla then they are diffused. If someone eddy the lilyan then they are forceless. The charla cockle the farah.", "logic": "\nEddy(lilyan, farah)\nPonderable(lilyan)\nMesmeric(lilyan)\nPonderable(farah)\nDiarrhoeic(farah)\nMesmeric(farah)\nCockle(farah, nikkie)\nCrispen(farah, lilyan)\nEddy(charla, lilyan)\nPonderable(nikkie)\nDiarrhoeic(nikkie)\nDiffused(nikkie)\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) and Cockle(x, lilyan) -> Crispen(x, nikkie))\nforall x (Cockle(x, charla) and Cockle(x, farah) -> Crispen(x, lilyan))\nforall x (Forceless(x) -> Cockle(x, farah))\nforall x (Cockle(x, charla) -> Diffused(charla))\nforall x (Cockle(x, farah) -> Cockle(farah, lilyan))\nforall x (Ponderable(x) and Eddy(x, charla) -> Crispen(charla, lilyan))\nforall x (Cockle(x, lilyan) and Eddy(x, charla) -> Diffused(x))\nforall x (Eddy(x, lilyan) -> Forceless(x))\n\nCockle(charla, farah)\n\nEddy(charla, lilyan) and forall x (Eddy(x, lilyan) -> Forceless(x)) -> therefore Forceless(charla) Forceless(charla) and forall x (Forceless(x) -> Cockle(x, farah)) -> therefore Cockle(charla, farah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The thomas twitter the giovanni. The thomas is mingy. The thomas is squeezable. The giovanni is mingy. The giovanni is gruelling. The giovanni is squeezable. The giovanni factorise the rodger. The giovanni unknot the thomas. The wynnie twitter the thomas. The rodger is mingy. The rodger is gruelling. The rodger is socialist. If someone is gruelling and they need the thomas then they see the rodger. If someone factorise the wynnie and they need the giovanni then they see the thomas. If someone is lebanese then they need the giovanni. If someone factorise the wynnie then the wynnie is socialist. If someone factorise the giovanni then the giovanni factorise the thomas. If someone is mingy and they eat the wynnie then the wynnie unknot the thomas. If someone factorise the thomas and they eat the wynnie then they are socialist. If someone twitter the thomas then they are lebanese. The wynnie does not need the giovanni.", "logic": "\nTwitter(thomas, giovanni)\nMingy(thomas)\nSqueezable(thomas)\nMingy(giovanni)\nGruelling(giovanni)\nSqueezable(giovanni)\nFactorise(giovanni, rodger)\nUnknot(giovanni, thomas)\nTwitter(wynnie, thomas)\nMingy(rodger)\nGruelling(rodger)\nSocialist(rodger)\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and Factorise(x, thomas) -> Unknot(x, rodger))\nforall x (Factorise(x, wynnie) and Factorise(x, giovanni) -> Unknot(x, thomas))\nforall x (Lebanese(x) -> Factorise(x, giovanni))\nforall x (Factorise(x, wynnie) -> Socialist(wynnie))\nforall x (Factorise(x, giovanni) -> Factorise(giovanni, thomas))\nforall x (Mingy(x) and Twitter(x, wynnie) -> Unknot(wynnie, thomas))\nforall x (Factorise(x, thomas) and Twitter(x, wynnie) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Twitter(x, thomas) -> Lebanese(x))\n\nnot Factorise(wynnie, giovanni)\n\nTwitter(wynnie, thomas) and forall x (Twitter(x, thomas) -> Lebanese(x)) -> therefore Lebanese(wynnie) Lebanese(wynnie) and forall x (Lebanese(x) -> Factorise(x, giovanni)) -> therefore Factorise(wynnie, giovanni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The adrianne incandesce the leo. The adrianne is trihydroxy. The adrianne is caesural. The leo is trihydroxy. The leo is liveable. The leo is caesural. The leo clangor the imelda. The leo bottleneck the adrianne. The kip incandesce the adrianne. The imelda is trihydroxy. The imelda is liveable. The imelda is alabaster. If someone is liveable and they need the adrianne then they see the imelda. If someone clangor the kip and they need the leo then they see the adrianne. If someone is dozy then they need the leo. If someone clangor the kip then the kip is alabaster. If someone clangor the leo then the leo clangor the adrianne. If someone is trihydroxy and they eat the kip then the kip bottleneck the adrianne. If someone clangor the adrianne and they eat the kip then they are alabaster. If someone incandesce the adrianne then they are dozy. The leo clangor the adrianne.", "logic": "\nIncandesce(adrianne, leo)\nTrihydroxy(adrianne)\nCaesural(adrianne)\nTrihydroxy(leo)\nLiveable(leo)\nCaesural(leo)\nClangor(leo, imelda)\nBottleneck(leo, adrianne)\nIncandesce(kip, adrianne)\nTrihydroxy(imelda)\nLiveable(imelda)\nAlabaster(imelda)\nforall x (Liveable(x) and Clangor(x, adrianne) -> Bottleneck(x, imelda))\nforall x (Clangor(x, kip) and Clangor(x, leo) -> Bottleneck(x, adrianne))\nforall x (Dozy(x) -> Clangor(x, leo))\nforall x (Clangor(x, kip) -> Alabaster(kip))\nforall x (Clangor(x, leo) -> Clangor(leo, adrianne))\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) and Incandesce(x, kip) -> Bottleneck(kip, adrianne))\nforall x (Clangor(x, adrianne) and Incandesce(x, kip) -> Alabaster(x))\nforall x (Incandesce(x, adrianne) -> Dozy(x))\n\nClangor(leo, adrianne)\n\nIncandesce(kip, adrianne) and forall x (Incandesce(x, adrianne) -> Dozy(x)) -> therefore Dozy(kip) Dozy(kip) and forall x (Dozy(x) -> Clangor(x, leo)) -> therefore Clangor(kip, leo) Clangor(kip, leo) and forall x (Clangor(x, leo) -> Clangor(leo, adrianne)) -> therefore Clangor(leo, adrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The bartlett perorate the lanni. The bartlett is aboral. The bartlett is confusable. The lanni is aboral. The lanni is posh. The lanni is confusable. The lanni starve the kary. The lanni thermostat the bartlett. The tyrone perorate the bartlett. The kary is aboral. The kary is posh. The kary is jingly. If someone is posh and they need the bartlett then they see the kary. If someone starve the tyrone and they need the lanni then they see the bartlett. If someone is wasted then they need the lanni. If someone starve the tyrone then the tyrone is jingly. If someone starve the lanni then the lanni starve the bartlett. If someone is aboral and they eat the tyrone then the tyrone thermostat the bartlett. If someone starve the bartlett and they eat the tyrone then they are jingly. If someone perorate the bartlett then they are wasted. The lanni does not need the bartlett.", "logic": "\nPerorate(bartlett, lanni)\nAboral(bartlett)\nConfusable(bartlett)\nAboral(lanni)\nPosh(lanni)\nConfusable(lanni)\nStarve(lanni, kary)\nThermostat(lanni, bartlett)\nPerorate(tyrone, bartlett)\nAboral(kary)\nPosh(kary)\nJingly(kary)\nforall x (Posh(x) and Starve(x, bartlett) -> Thermostat(x, kary))\nforall x (Starve(x, tyrone) and Starve(x, lanni) -> Thermostat(x, bartlett))\nforall x (Wasted(x) -> Starve(x, lanni))\nforall x (Starve(x, tyrone) -> Jingly(tyrone))\nforall x (Starve(x, lanni) -> Starve(lanni, bartlett))\nforall x (Aboral(x) and Perorate(x, tyrone) -> Thermostat(tyrone, bartlett))\nforall x (Starve(x, bartlett) and Perorate(x, tyrone) -> Jingly(x))\nforall x (Perorate(x, bartlett) -> Wasted(x))\n\nnot Starve(lanni, bartlett)\n\nPerorate(tyrone, bartlett) and forall x (Perorate(x, bartlett) -> Wasted(x)) -> therefore Wasted(tyrone) Wasted(tyrone) and forall x (Wasted(x) -> Starve(x, lanni)) -> therefore Starve(tyrone, lanni) Starve(tyrone, lanni) and forall x (Starve(x, lanni) -> Starve(lanni, bartlett)) -> therefore Starve(lanni, bartlett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The tam unyoke the elianore. The tam is visceral. The tam is violated. The elianore is visceral. The elianore is olden. The elianore is violated. The elianore abscise the klarrisa. The elianore burst the tam. The ilysa unyoke the tam. The klarrisa is visceral. The klarrisa is olden. The klarrisa is mismatched. If someone is olden and they need the tam then they see the klarrisa. If someone abscise the ilysa and they need the elianore then they see the tam. If someone is hotheaded then they need the elianore. If someone abscise the ilysa then the ilysa is mismatched. If someone abscise the elianore then the elianore abscise the tam. If someone is visceral and they eat the ilysa then the ilysa burst the tam. If someone abscise the tam and they eat the ilysa then they are mismatched. If someone unyoke the tam then they are hotheaded. The klarrisa is not hotheaded.", "logic": "\nUnyoke(tam, elianore)\nVisceral(tam)\nViolated(tam)\nVisceral(elianore)\nOlden(elianore)\nViolated(elianore)\nAbscise(elianore, klarrisa)\nBurst(elianore, tam)\nUnyoke(ilysa, tam)\nVisceral(klarrisa)\nOlden(klarrisa)\nMismatched(klarrisa)\nforall x (Olden(x) and Abscise(x, tam) -> Burst(x, klarrisa))\nforall x (Abscise(x, ilysa) and Abscise(x, elianore) -> Burst(x, tam))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Abscise(x, elianore))\nforall x (Abscise(x, ilysa) -> Mismatched(ilysa))\nforall x (Abscise(x, elianore) -> Abscise(elianore, tam))\nforall x (Visceral(x) and Unyoke(x, ilysa) -> Burst(ilysa, tam))\nforall x (Abscise(x, tam) and Unyoke(x, ilysa) -> Mismatched(x))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, tam) -> Hotheaded(x))\n\nnot Hotheaded(klarrisa)\n\nforall x (Unyoke(x, tam) -> Hotheaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The shurlocke clinch the rowland. The shurlocke is apopemptic. The shurlocke is lobated. The rowland is apopemptic. The rowland is jihadi. The rowland is lobated. The rowland floor the euclid. The rowland bulldog the shurlocke. The ingaborg clinch the shurlocke. The euclid is apopemptic. The euclid is jihadi. The euclid is deciphered. If someone is jihadi and they need the shurlocke then they see the euclid. If someone floor the ingaborg and they need the rowland then they see the shurlocke. If someone is majuscule then they need the rowland. If someone floor the ingaborg then the ingaborg is deciphered. If someone floor the rowland then the rowland floor the shurlocke. If someone is apopemptic and they eat the ingaborg then the ingaborg bulldog the shurlocke. If someone floor the shurlocke and they eat the ingaborg then they are deciphered. If someone clinch the shurlocke then they are majuscule. The rowland is deciphered.", "logic": "\nClinch(shurlocke, rowland)\nApopemptic(shurlocke)\nLobated(shurlocke)\nApopemptic(rowland)\nJihadi(rowland)\nLobated(rowland)\nFloor(rowland, euclid)\nBulldog(rowland, shurlocke)\nClinch(ingaborg, shurlocke)\nApopemptic(euclid)\nJihadi(euclid)\nDeciphered(euclid)\nforall x (Jihadi(x) and Floor(x, shurlocke) -> Bulldog(x, euclid))\nforall x (Floor(x, ingaborg) and Floor(x, rowland) -> Bulldog(x, shurlocke))\nforall x (Majuscule(x) -> Floor(x, rowland))\nforall x (Floor(x, ingaborg) -> Deciphered(ingaborg))\nforall x (Floor(x, rowland) -> Floor(rowland, shurlocke))\nforall x (Apopemptic(x) and Clinch(x, ingaborg) -> Bulldog(ingaborg, shurlocke))\nforall x (Floor(x, shurlocke) and Clinch(x, ingaborg) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Clinch(x, shurlocke) -> Majuscule(x))\n\nDeciphered(rowland)\n\nforall x (Floor(x, shurlocke) and Clinch(x, ingaborg) -> Deciphered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The hew overplay the galen. The hew is torpid. The hew is osseous. The galen is torpid. The galen is intragroup. The galen is osseous. The galen banish the leonie. The galen interpose the hew. The davey overplay the hew. The leonie is torpid. The leonie is intragroup. The leonie is infrequent. If someone is intragroup and they need the hew then they see the leonie. If someone banish the davey and they need the galen then they see the hew. If someone is unagitated then they need the galen. If someone banish the davey then the davey is infrequent. If someone banish the galen then the galen banish the hew. If someone is torpid and they eat the davey then the davey interpose the hew. If someone banish the hew and they eat the davey then they are infrequent. If someone overplay the hew then they are unagitated. The hew is not unagitated.", "logic": "\nOverplay(hew, galen)\nTorpid(hew)\nOsseous(hew)\nTorpid(galen)\nIntragroup(galen)\nOsseous(galen)\nBanish(galen, leonie)\nInterpose(galen, hew)\nOverplay(davey, hew)\nTorpid(leonie)\nIntragroup(leonie)\nInfrequent(leonie)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) and Banish(x, hew) -> Interpose(x, leonie))\nforall x (Banish(x, davey) and Banish(x, galen) -> Interpose(x, hew))\nforall x (Unagitated(x) -> Banish(x, galen))\nforall x (Banish(x, davey) -> Infrequent(davey))\nforall x (Banish(x, galen) -> Banish(galen, hew))\nforall x (Torpid(x) and Overplay(x, davey) -> Interpose(davey, hew))\nforall x (Banish(x, hew) and Overplay(x, davey) -> Infrequent(x))\nforall x (Overplay(x, hew) -> Unagitated(x))\n\nnot Unagitated(hew)\n\nforall x (Overplay(x, hew) -> Unagitated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The rudie curdle the pia. The rudie is adynamic. The rudie is dingy. The pia is adynamic. The pia is geologic. The pia is dingy. The pia raven the matias. The pia horrify the rudie. The liz curdle the rudie. The matias is adynamic. The matias is geologic. The matias is adsorptive. If someone is geologic and they need the rudie then they see the matias. If someone raven the liz and they need the pia then they see the rudie. If someone is landlocked then they need the pia. If someone raven the liz then the liz is adsorptive. If someone raven the pia then the pia raven the rudie. If someone is adynamic and they eat the liz then the liz horrify the rudie. If someone raven the rudie and they eat the liz then they are adsorptive. If someone curdle the rudie then they are landlocked. The pia is landlocked.", "logic": "\nCurdle(rudie, pia)\nAdynamic(rudie)\nDingy(rudie)\nAdynamic(pia)\nGeologic(pia)\nDingy(pia)\nRaven(pia, matias)\nHorrify(pia, rudie)\nCurdle(liz, rudie)\nAdynamic(matias)\nGeologic(matias)\nAdsorptive(matias)\nforall x (Geologic(x) and Raven(x, rudie) -> Horrify(x, matias))\nforall x (Raven(x, liz) and Raven(x, pia) -> Horrify(x, rudie))\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Raven(x, pia))\nforall x (Raven(x, liz) -> Adsorptive(liz))\nforall x (Raven(x, pia) -> Raven(pia, rudie))\nforall x (Adynamic(x) and Curdle(x, liz) -> Horrify(liz, rudie))\nforall x (Raven(x, rudie) and Curdle(x, liz) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Curdle(x, rudie) -> Landlocked(x))\n\nLandlocked(pia)\n\nforall x (Curdle(x, rudie) -> Landlocked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The sandie stabilise the annice. The sandie is tyrolese. The sandie is anile. The annice is tyrolese. The annice is overpriced. The annice is anile. The annice override the myrle. The annice dehumanize the sandie. The phedra stabilise the sandie. The myrle is tyrolese. The myrle is overpriced. The myrle is shitless. If someone is overpriced and they need the sandie then they see the myrle. If someone override the phedra and they need the annice then they see the sandie. If someone is anamorphic then they need the annice. If someone override the phedra then the phedra is shitless. If someone override the annice then the annice override the sandie. If someone is tyrolese and they eat the phedra then the phedra dehumanize the sandie. If someone override the sandie and they eat the phedra then they are shitless. If someone stabilise the sandie then they are anamorphic. The annice does not see the phedra.", "logic": "\nStabilise(sandie, annice)\nTyrolese(sandie)\nAnile(sandie)\nTyrolese(annice)\nOverpriced(annice)\nAnile(annice)\nOverride(annice, myrle)\nDehumanize(annice, sandie)\nStabilise(phedra, sandie)\nTyrolese(myrle)\nOverpriced(myrle)\nShitless(myrle)\nforall x (Overpriced(x) and Override(x, sandie) -> Dehumanize(x, myrle))\nforall x (Override(x, phedra) and Override(x, annice) -> Dehumanize(x, sandie))\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) -> Override(x, annice))\nforall x (Override(x, phedra) -> Shitless(phedra))\nforall x (Override(x, annice) -> Override(annice, sandie))\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) and Stabilise(x, phedra) -> Dehumanize(phedra, sandie))\nforall x (Override(x, sandie) and Stabilise(x, phedra) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Stabilise(x, sandie) -> Anamorphic(x))\n\nnot Dehumanize(annice, phedra)\n\nnot Dehumanize(annice, phedra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The garp copyedit the giacomo. The garp is lxxxvi. The garp is goodly. The giacomo is lxxxvi. The giacomo is geriatric. The giacomo is goodly. The giacomo enlarge the judas. The giacomo tidy the garp. The danny copyedit the garp. The judas is lxxxvi. The judas is geriatric. The judas is gamy. If someone is geriatric and they need the garp then they see the judas. If someone enlarge the danny and they need the giacomo then they see the garp. If someone is blooming then they need the giacomo. If someone enlarge the danny then the danny is gamy. If someone enlarge the giacomo then the giacomo enlarge the garp. If someone is lxxxvi and they eat the danny then the danny tidy the garp. If someone enlarge the garp and they eat the danny then they are gamy. If someone copyedit the garp then they are blooming. The judas is goodly.", "logic": "\nCopyedit(garp, giacomo)\nLxxxvi(garp)\nGoodly(garp)\nLxxxvi(giacomo)\nGeriatric(giacomo)\nGoodly(giacomo)\nEnlarge(giacomo, judas)\nTidy(giacomo, garp)\nCopyedit(danny, garp)\nLxxxvi(judas)\nGeriatric(judas)\nGamy(judas)\nforall x (Geriatric(x) and Enlarge(x, garp) -> Tidy(x, judas))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, danny) and Enlarge(x, giacomo) -> Tidy(x, garp))\nforall x (Blooming(x) -> Enlarge(x, giacomo))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, danny) -> Gamy(danny))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, giacomo) -> Enlarge(giacomo, garp))\nforall x (Lxxxvi(x) and Copyedit(x, danny) -> Tidy(danny, garp))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, garp) and Copyedit(x, danny) -> Gamy(x))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, garp) -> Blooming(x))\n\nGoodly(judas)\n\nGoodly(judas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The shalom importune the elsinore. The shalom is sequined. The shalom is traveled. The elsinore is sequined. The elsinore is polyploid. The elsinore is traveled. The elsinore steamroll the urbano. The elsinore backstroke the shalom. The eve importune the shalom. The urbano is sequined. The urbano is polyploid. The urbano is exodontic. If someone is polyploid and they need the shalom then they see the urbano. If someone steamroll the eve and they need the elsinore then they see the shalom. If someone is twisty then they need the elsinore. If someone steamroll the eve then the eve is exodontic. If someone steamroll the elsinore then the elsinore steamroll the shalom. If someone is sequined and they eat the eve then the eve backstroke the shalom. If someone steamroll the shalom and they eat the eve then they are exodontic. If someone importune the shalom then they are twisty. The elsinore does not eat the shalom.", "logic": "\nImportune(shalom, elsinore)\nSequined(shalom)\nTraveled(shalom)\nSequined(elsinore)\nPolyploid(elsinore)\nTraveled(elsinore)\nSteamroll(elsinore, urbano)\nBackstroke(elsinore, shalom)\nImportune(eve, shalom)\nSequined(urbano)\nPolyploid(urbano)\nExodontic(urbano)\nforall x (Polyploid(x) and Steamroll(x, shalom) -> Backstroke(x, urbano))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, eve) and Steamroll(x, elsinore) -> Backstroke(x, shalom))\nforall x (Twisty(x) -> Steamroll(x, elsinore))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, eve) -> Exodontic(eve))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, elsinore) -> Steamroll(elsinore, shalom))\nforall x (Sequined(x) and Importune(x, eve) -> Backstroke(eve, shalom))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, shalom) and Importune(x, eve) -> Exodontic(x))\nforall x (Importune(x, shalom) -> Twisty(x))\n\nnot Importune(elsinore, shalom)\n\nnot Importune(elsinore, shalom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The ardyce flesh the essa. The ardyce is algolagnic. The ardyce is terrific. The essa is algolagnic. The essa is schoolwide. The essa is terrific. The essa vanish the edgardo. The essa vulgarize the ardyce. The maressa flesh the ardyce. The edgardo is algolagnic. The edgardo is schoolwide. The edgardo is copacetic. If someone is schoolwide and they need the ardyce then they see the edgardo. If someone vanish the maressa and they need the essa then they see the ardyce. If someone is chafflike then they need the essa. If someone vanish the maressa then the maressa is copacetic. If someone vanish the essa then the essa vanish the ardyce. If someone is algolagnic and they eat the maressa then the maressa vulgarize the ardyce. If someone vanish the ardyce and they eat the maressa then they are copacetic. If someone flesh the ardyce then they are chafflike. The maressa vulgarize the maressa.", "logic": "\nFlesh(ardyce, essa)\nAlgolagnic(ardyce)\nTerrific(ardyce)\nAlgolagnic(essa)\nSchoolwide(essa)\nTerrific(essa)\nVanish(essa, edgardo)\nVulgarize(essa, ardyce)\nFlesh(maressa, ardyce)\nAlgolagnic(edgardo)\nSchoolwide(edgardo)\nCopacetic(edgardo)\nforall x (Schoolwide(x) and Vanish(x, ardyce) -> Vulgarize(x, edgardo))\nforall x (Vanish(x, maressa) and Vanish(x, essa) -> Vulgarize(x, ardyce))\nforall x (Chafflike(x) -> Vanish(x, essa))\nforall x (Vanish(x, maressa) -> Copacetic(maressa))\nforall x (Vanish(x, essa) -> Vanish(essa, ardyce))\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) and Flesh(x, maressa) -> Vulgarize(maressa, ardyce))\nforall x (Vanish(x, ardyce) and Flesh(x, maressa) -> Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Flesh(x, ardyce) -> Chafflike(x))\n\nVulgarize(maressa, maressa)\n\nVulgarize(maressa, maressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "Sandro is aural. Sandro is cytologic. Sandro is supplicant. Sandro is chinchy. Fran is squiggly. Fran is tearing. Maynord is chinchy. Maynord is tearing. Karylin is manifest. Karylin is tearing. If Sandro is manifest then Sandro is not tearing. If Sandro is aural and Sandro is cytologic then Sandro is squiggly. Furry, tearing things are manifest. Blue, squiggly things are manifest. If something is supplicant and manifest then it is cytologic. All cytologic, squiggly things are aural. If Karylin is manifest then Karylin is not supplicant. If Maynord is not supplicant then Maynord is aural. Karylin is tearing.", "logic": "\nAural(sandro)\nCytologic(sandro)\nSupplicant(sandro)\nChinchy(sandro)\nSquiggly(fran)\nTearing(fran)\nChinchy(maynord)\nTearing(maynord)\nManifest(karylin)\nTearing(karylin)\nManifest(sandro) -> not Tearing(sandro)\nAural(sandro) and Cytologic(sandro) -> Squiggly(sandro)\nforall x (Cytologic(x) and Tearing(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Aural(x) and Squiggly(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) and Manifest(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Cytologic(x) and Squiggly(x) -> Aural(x))\nManifest(karylin) -> not Supplicant(karylin)\nnot Supplicant(maynord) -> Aural(maynord)\n\nTearing(karylin)\n\ntherefore Tearing(karylin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Raimund is unimpeded. Raimund is jingoistic. Raimund is combed. Raimund is volar. Nettle is ductless. Nettle is surmisable. Julee is volar. Julee is surmisable. Demetris is every. Demetris is surmisable. If Raimund is every then Raimund is not surmisable. If Raimund is unimpeded and Raimund is jingoistic then Raimund is ductless. Furry, surmisable things are every. Blue, ductless things are every. If something is combed and every then it is jingoistic. All jingoistic, ductless things are unimpeded. If Demetris is every then Demetris is not combed. If Julee is not combed then Julee is unimpeded. Raimund is not volar.", "logic": "\nUnimpeded(raimund)\nJingoistic(raimund)\nCombed(raimund)\nVolar(raimund)\nDuctless(nettle)\nSurmisable(nettle)\nVolar(julee)\nSurmisable(julee)\nEvery(demetris)\nSurmisable(demetris)\nEvery(raimund) -> not Surmisable(raimund)\nUnimpeded(raimund) and Jingoistic(raimund) -> Ductless(raimund)\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) and Surmisable(x) -> Every(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) and Ductless(x) -> Every(x))\nforall x (Combed(x) and Every(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) and Ductless(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nEvery(demetris) -> not Combed(demetris)\nnot Combed(julee) -> Unimpeded(julee)\n\nnot Volar(raimund)\n\ntherefore Volar(raimund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Hercules is centigrade. Hercules is voltarian. Hercules is kitschy. Hercules is unerring. Doralynn is laboured. Doralynn is dropsical. Alton is unerring. Alton is dropsical. Georgetta is linguistic. Georgetta is dropsical. If Hercules is linguistic then Hercules is not dropsical. If Hercules is centigrade and Hercules is voltarian then Hercules is laboured. Furry, dropsical things are linguistic. Blue, laboured things are linguistic. If something is kitschy and linguistic then it is voltarian. All voltarian, laboured things are centigrade. If Georgetta is linguistic then Georgetta is not kitschy. If Alton is not kitschy then Alton is centigrade. Hercules is laboured.", "logic": "\nCentigrade(hercules)\nVoltarian(hercules)\nKitschy(hercules)\nUnerring(hercules)\nLaboured(doralynn)\nDropsical(doralynn)\nUnerring(alton)\nDropsical(alton)\nLinguistic(georgetta)\nDropsical(georgetta)\nLinguistic(hercules) -> not Dropsical(hercules)\nCentigrade(hercules) and Voltarian(hercules) -> Laboured(hercules)\nforall x (Voltarian(x) and Dropsical(x) -> Linguistic(x))\nforall x (Centigrade(x) and Laboured(x) -> Linguistic(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Linguistic(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Voltarian(x) and Laboured(x) -> Centigrade(x))\nLinguistic(georgetta) -> not Kitschy(georgetta)\nnot Kitschy(alton) -> Centigrade(alton)\n\nLaboured(hercules)\n\nCentigrade(hercules) and Voltarian(hercules) and Centigrade(hercules) and Voltarian(hercules) -> Laboured(hercules) -> therefore Laboured(hercules)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Jacklyn is fluffy. Jacklyn is sarcosomal. Jacklyn is naif. Jacklyn is yeasty. Codi is pressed. Codi is freckled. Leann is yeasty. Leann is freckled. Ewan is emasculate. Ewan is freckled. If Jacklyn is emasculate then Jacklyn is not freckled. If Jacklyn is fluffy and Jacklyn is sarcosomal then Jacklyn is pressed. Furry, freckled things are emasculate. Blue, pressed things are emasculate. If something is naif and emasculate then it is sarcosomal. All sarcosomal, pressed things are fluffy. If Ewan is emasculate then Ewan is not naif. If Leann is not naif then Leann is fluffy. Ewan is naif.", "logic": "\nFluffy(jacklyn)\nSarcosomal(jacklyn)\nNaif(jacklyn)\nYeasty(jacklyn)\nPressed(codi)\nFreckled(codi)\nYeasty(leann)\nFreckled(leann)\nEmasculate(ewan)\nFreckled(ewan)\nEmasculate(jacklyn) -> not Freckled(jacklyn)\nFluffy(jacklyn) and Sarcosomal(jacklyn) -> Pressed(jacklyn)\nforall x (Sarcosomal(x) and Freckled(x) -> Emasculate(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) and Pressed(x) -> Emasculate(x))\nforall x (Naif(x) and Emasculate(x) -> Sarcosomal(x))\nforall x (Sarcosomal(x) and Pressed(x) -> Fluffy(x))\nEmasculate(ewan) -> not Naif(ewan)\nnot Naif(leann) -> Fluffy(leann)\n\nNaif(ewan)\n\nEmasculate(ewan) and Emasculate(ewan) -> not Naif(ewan) -> therefore not Naif(ewan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Robinett is anti. Robinett is xcvii. Robinett is furthest. Robinett is xiii. Bonnee is viscous. Bonnee is benefic. Meara is xiii. Meara is benefic. Claribel is monodical. Claribel is benefic. If Robinett is monodical then Robinett is not benefic. If Robinett is anti and Robinett is xcvii then Robinett is viscous. Furry, benefic things are monodical. Blue, viscous things are monodical. If something is furthest and monodical then it is xcvii. All xcvii, viscous things are anti. If Claribel is monodical then Claribel is not furthest. If Meara is not furthest then Meara is anti. Robinett is monodical.", "logic": "\nAnti(robinett)\nXcvii(robinett)\nFurthest(robinett)\nXiii(robinett)\nViscous(bonnee)\nBenefic(bonnee)\nXiii(meara)\nBenefic(meara)\nMonodical(claribel)\nBenefic(claribel)\nMonodical(robinett) -> not Benefic(robinett)\nAnti(robinett) and Xcvii(robinett) -> Viscous(robinett)\nforall x (Xcvii(x) and Benefic(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Anti(x) and Viscous(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and Monodical(x) -> Xcvii(x))\nforall x (Xcvii(x) and Viscous(x) -> Anti(x))\nMonodical(claribel) -> not Furthest(claribel)\nnot Furthest(meara) -> Anti(meara)\n\nMonodical(robinett)\n\nAnti(robinett) and Xcvii(robinett) and Anti(robinett) and Xcvii(robinett) -> Viscous(robinett) -> therefore Viscous(robinett) Anti(robinett) and Viscous(robinett) and forall x (Anti(x) and Viscous(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(robinett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Maggy is atheistic. Maggy is ambient. Maggy is hedged. Maggy is victorian. Carol is fore. Carol is heedless. Stefano is victorian. Stefano is heedless. Steffie is vestibular. Steffie is heedless. If Maggy is vestibular then Maggy is not heedless. If Maggy is atheistic and Maggy is ambient then Maggy is fore. Furry, heedless things are vestibular. Blue, fore things are vestibular. If something is hedged and vestibular then it is ambient. All ambient, fore things are atheistic. If Steffie is vestibular then Steffie is not hedged. If Stefano is not hedged then Stefano is atheistic. Maggy is not vestibular.", "logic": "\nAtheistic(maggy)\nAmbient(maggy)\nHedged(maggy)\nVictorian(maggy)\nFore(carol)\nHeedless(carol)\nVictorian(stefano)\nHeedless(stefano)\nVestibular(steffie)\nHeedless(steffie)\nVestibular(maggy) -> not Heedless(maggy)\nAtheistic(maggy) and Ambient(maggy) -> Fore(maggy)\nforall x (Ambient(x) and Heedless(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) and Fore(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Vestibular(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Ambient(x) and Fore(x) -> Atheistic(x))\nVestibular(steffie) -> not Hedged(steffie)\nnot Hedged(stefano) -> Atheistic(stefano)\n\nnot Vestibular(maggy)\n\nAtheistic(maggy) and Ambient(maggy) and Atheistic(maggy) and Ambient(maggy) -> Fore(maggy) -> therefore Fore(maggy) Atheistic(maggy) and Fore(maggy) and forall x (Atheistic(x) and Fore(x) -> Vestibular(x)) -> therefore Vestibular(maggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Roobbie is mystifying. Roobbie is mounted. Roobbie is caramel. Roobbie is keyed. Vania is plaguy. Vania is slithery. Celie is keyed. Celie is slithery. Bertie is kittenish. Bertie is slithery. If Roobbie is kittenish then Roobbie is not slithery. If Roobbie is mystifying and Roobbie is mounted then Roobbie is plaguy. Furry, slithery things are kittenish. Blue, plaguy things are kittenish. If something is caramel and kittenish then it is mounted. All mounted, plaguy things are mystifying. If Bertie is kittenish then Bertie is not caramel. If Celie is not caramel then Celie is mystifying. Roobbie is not slithery.", "logic": "\nMystifying(roobbie)\nMounted(roobbie)\nCaramel(roobbie)\nKeyed(roobbie)\nPlaguy(vania)\nSlithery(vania)\nKeyed(celie)\nSlithery(celie)\nKittenish(bertie)\nSlithery(bertie)\nKittenish(roobbie) -> not Slithery(roobbie)\nMystifying(roobbie) and Mounted(roobbie) -> Plaguy(roobbie)\nforall x (Mounted(x) and Slithery(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) and Plaguy(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Caramel(x) and Kittenish(x) -> Mounted(x))\nforall x (Mounted(x) and Plaguy(x) -> Mystifying(x))\nKittenish(bertie) -> not Caramel(bertie)\nnot Caramel(celie) -> Mystifying(celie)\n\nnot Slithery(roobbie)\n\nMystifying(roobbie) and Mounted(roobbie) and Mystifying(roobbie) and Mounted(roobbie) -> Plaguy(roobbie) -> therefore Plaguy(roobbie) Mystifying(roobbie) and Plaguy(roobbie) and forall x (Mystifying(x) and Plaguy(x) -> Kittenish(x)) -> therefore Kittenish(roobbie) Kittenish(roobbie) and Kittenish(roobbie) -> not Slithery(roobbie) -> therefore not Slithery(roobbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Lara is somnolent. Lara is merry. Lara is pilose. Lara is hemolytic. Kriste is adoptable. Kriste is ransomed. Purcell is hemolytic. Purcell is ransomed. Barbara is beta. Barbara is ransomed. If Lara is beta then Lara is not ransomed. If Lara is somnolent and Lara is merry then Lara is adoptable. Furry, ransomed things are beta. Blue, adoptable things are beta. If something is pilose and beta then it is merry. All merry, adoptable things are somnolent. If Barbara is beta then Barbara is not pilose. If Purcell is not pilose then Purcell is somnolent. Lara is ransomed.", "logic": "\nSomnolent(lara)\nMerry(lara)\nPilose(lara)\nHemolytic(lara)\nAdoptable(kriste)\nRansomed(kriste)\nHemolytic(purcell)\nRansomed(purcell)\nBeta(barbara)\nRansomed(barbara)\nBeta(lara) -> not Ransomed(lara)\nSomnolent(lara) and Merry(lara) -> Adoptable(lara)\nforall x (Merry(x) and Ransomed(x) -> Beta(x))\nforall x (Somnolent(x) and Adoptable(x) -> Beta(x))\nforall x (Pilose(x) and Beta(x) -> Merry(x))\nforall x (Merry(x) and Adoptable(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nBeta(barbara) -> not Pilose(barbara)\nnot Pilose(purcell) -> Somnolent(purcell)\n\nRansomed(lara)\n\nSomnolent(lara) and Merry(lara) and Somnolent(lara) and Merry(lara) -> Adoptable(lara) -> therefore Adoptable(lara) Somnolent(lara) and Adoptable(lara) and forall x (Somnolent(x) and Adoptable(x) -> Beta(x)) -> therefore Beta(lara) Beta(lara) and Beta(lara) -> not Ransomed(lara) -> therefore not Ransomed(lara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Brandie is yuman. Brandie is operatic. Brandie is rural. Brandie is ramous. Maxi is suboceanic. Maxi is mishnaic. Glynnis is ramous. Glynnis is mishnaic. Tomasine is daring. Tomasine is mishnaic. If Brandie is daring then Brandie is not mishnaic. If Brandie is yuman and Brandie is operatic then Brandie is suboceanic. Furry, mishnaic things are daring. Blue, suboceanic things are daring. If something is rural and daring then it is operatic. All operatic, suboceanic things are yuman. If Tomasine is daring then Tomasine is not rural. If Glynnis is not rural then Glynnis is yuman. Maxi is not daring.", "logic": "\nYuman(brandie)\nOperatic(brandie)\nRural(brandie)\nRamous(brandie)\nSuboceanic(maxi)\nMishnaic(maxi)\nRamous(glynnis)\nMishnaic(glynnis)\nDaring(tomasine)\nMishnaic(tomasine)\nDaring(brandie) -> not Mishnaic(brandie)\nYuman(brandie) and Operatic(brandie) -> Suboceanic(brandie)\nforall x (Operatic(x) and Mishnaic(x) -> Daring(x))\nforall x (Yuman(x) and Suboceanic(x) -> Daring(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and Daring(x) -> Operatic(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) and Suboceanic(x) -> Yuman(x))\nDaring(tomasine) -> not Rural(tomasine)\nnot Rural(glynnis) -> Yuman(glynnis)\n\nnot Daring(maxi)\n\nforall x (Yuman(x) and Suboceanic(x) -> Daring(x)) <- forall x (Operatic(x) and Suboceanic(x) -> Yuman(x)) <- forall x (Rural(x) and Daring(x) -> Operatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Simon is caloric. Simon is vulpine. Simon is trembling. Simon is unbrushed. Emile is extant. Emile is unsullied. Seka is unbrushed. Seka is unsullied. Prudy is priapic. Prudy is unsullied. If Simon is priapic then Simon is not unsullied. If Simon is caloric and Simon is vulpine then Simon is extant. Furry, unsullied things are priapic. Blue, extant things are priapic. If something is trembling and priapic then it is vulpine. All vulpine, extant things are caloric. If Prudy is priapic then Prudy is not trembling. If Seka is not trembling then Seka is caloric. Prudy is vulpine.", "logic": "\nCaloric(simon)\nVulpine(simon)\nTrembling(simon)\nUnbrushed(simon)\nExtant(emile)\nUnsullied(emile)\nUnbrushed(seka)\nUnsullied(seka)\nPriapic(prudy)\nUnsullied(prudy)\nPriapic(simon) -> not Unsullied(simon)\nCaloric(simon) and Vulpine(simon) -> Extant(simon)\nforall x (Vulpine(x) and Unsullied(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Caloric(x) and Extant(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Trembling(x) and Priapic(x) -> Vulpine(x))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) and Extant(x) -> Caloric(x))\nPriapic(prudy) -> not Trembling(prudy)\nnot Trembling(seka) -> Caloric(seka)\n\nVulpine(prudy)\n\nforall x (Trembling(x) and Priapic(x) -> Vulpine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Love is pleasing. Love is bedraggled. Love is fallible. Love is anguished. Rahul is fleeting. Rahul is phonic. Myrta is anguished. Myrta is phonic. Delcina is measured. Delcina is phonic. If Love is measured then Love is not phonic. If Love is pleasing and Love is bedraggled then Love is fleeting. Furry, phonic things are measured. Blue, fleeting things are measured. If something is fallible and measured then it is bedraggled. All bedraggled, fleeting things are pleasing. If Delcina is measured then Delcina is not fallible. If Myrta is not fallible then Myrta is pleasing. Rahul is not pleasing.", "logic": "\nPleasing(love)\nBedraggled(love)\nFallible(love)\nAnguished(love)\nFleeting(rahul)\nPhonic(rahul)\nAnguished(myrta)\nPhonic(myrta)\nMeasured(delcina)\nPhonic(delcina)\nMeasured(love) -> not Phonic(love)\nPleasing(love) and Bedraggled(love) -> Fleeting(love)\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Phonic(x) -> Measured(x))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) and Fleeting(x) -> Measured(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Measured(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Fleeting(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nMeasured(delcina) -> not Fallible(delcina)\nnot Fallible(myrta) -> Pleasing(myrta)\n\nnot Pleasing(rahul)\n\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Fleeting(x) -> Pleasing(x)) <- forall x (Fallible(x) and Measured(x) -> Bedraggled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Edithe is reflex. Edithe is trussed. Edithe is moraceous. Edithe is starboard. Darbie is unwrinkled. Darbie is adjuvant. Shelly is starboard. Shelly is adjuvant. Marys is expectant. Marys is adjuvant. If Edithe is expectant then Edithe is not adjuvant. If Edithe is reflex and Edithe is trussed then Edithe is unwrinkled. Furry, adjuvant things are expectant. Blue, unwrinkled things are expectant. If something is moraceous and expectant then it is trussed. All trussed, unwrinkled things are reflex. If Marys is expectant then Marys is not moraceous. If Shelly is not moraceous then Shelly is reflex. Shelly is reflex.", "logic": "\nReflex(edithe)\nTrussed(edithe)\nMoraceous(edithe)\nStarboard(edithe)\nUnwrinkled(darbie)\nAdjuvant(darbie)\nStarboard(shelly)\nAdjuvant(shelly)\nExpectant(marys)\nAdjuvant(marys)\nExpectant(edithe) -> not Adjuvant(edithe)\nReflex(edithe) and Trussed(edithe) -> Unwrinkled(edithe)\nforall x (Trussed(x) and Adjuvant(x) -> Expectant(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Unwrinkled(x) -> Expectant(x))\nforall x (Moraceous(x) and Expectant(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) and Unwrinkled(x) -> Reflex(x))\nExpectant(marys) -> not Moraceous(marys)\nnot Moraceous(shelly) -> Reflex(shelly)\n\nReflex(shelly)\n\nforall x (Trussed(x) and Unwrinkled(x) -> Reflex(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Tedman is western. Tedman is patchy. Tedman is retral. Tedman is nautical. Dolores is torturing. Dolores is unsated. Rodney is nautical. Rodney is unsated. Marleen is climbable. Marleen is unsated. If Tedman is climbable then Tedman is not unsated. If Tedman is western and Tedman is patchy then Tedman is torturing. Furry, unsated things are climbable. Blue, torturing things are climbable. If something is retral and climbable then it is patchy. All patchy, torturing things are western. If Marleen is climbable then Marleen is not retral. If Rodney is not retral then Rodney is western. Dolores is not nautical.", "logic": "\nWestern(tedman)\nPatchy(tedman)\nRetral(tedman)\nNautical(tedman)\nTorturing(dolores)\nUnsated(dolores)\nNautical(rodney)\nUnsated(rodney)\nClimbable(marleen)\nUnsated(marleen)\nClimbable(tedman) -> not Unsated(tedman)\nWestern(tedman) and Patchy(tedman) -> Torturing(tedman)\nforall x (Patchy(x) and Unsated(x) -> Climbable(x))\nforall x (Western(x) and Torturing(x) -> Climbable(x))\nforall x (Retral(x) and Climbable(x) -> Patchy(x))\nforall x (Patchy(x) and Torturing(x) -> Western(x))\nClimbable(marleen) -> not Retral(marleen)\nnot Retral(rodney) -> Western(rodney)\n\nnot Nautical(dolores)\n\nnot Nautical(dolores) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Jemimah is sundry. Jemimah is universal. Jemimah is analgetic. Jemimah is imperious. Moises is undulatory. Moises is unpompous. Merrie is imperious. Merrie is unpompous. Beitris is viatical. Beitris is unpompous. If Jemimah is viatical then Jemimah is not unpompous. If Jemimah is sundry and Jemimah is universal then Jemimah is undulatory. Furry, unpompous things are viatical. Blue, undulatory things are viatical. If something is analgetic and viatical then it is universal. All universal, undulatory things are sundry. If Beitris is viatical then Beitris is not analgetic. If Merrie is not analgetic then Merrie is sundry. Beitris is undulatory.", "logic": "\nSundry(jemimah)\nUniversal(jemimah)\nAnalgetic(jemimah)\nImperious(jemimah)\nUndulatory(moises)\nUnpompous(moises)\nImperious(merrie)\nUnpompous(merrie)\nViatical(beitris)\nUnpompous(beitris)\nViatical(jemimah) -> not Unpompous(jemimah)\nSundry(jemimah) and Universal(jemimah) -> Undulatory(jemimah)\nforall x (Universal(x) and Unpompous(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Sundry(x) and Undulatory(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) and Viatical(x) -> Universal(x))\nforall x (Universal(x) and Undulatory(x) -> Sundry(x))\nViatical(beitris) -> not Analgetic(beitris)\nnot Analgetic(merrie) -> Sundry(merrie)\n\nUndulatory(beitris)\n\nUndulatory(beitris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Morse is laureate. Morse is gory. Morse is epizoic. Morse is numbing. Winni is nether. Winni is prototypal. Jill is numbing. Jill is prototypal. Juliane is windswept. Juliane is prototypal. If Morse is windswept then Morse is not prototypal. If Morse is laureate and Morse is gory then Morse is nether. Furry, prototypal things are windswept. Blue, nether things are windswept. If something is epizoic and windswept then it is gory. All gory, nether things are laureate. If Juliane is windswept then Juliane is not epizoic. If Jill is not epizoic then Jill is laureate. Juliane is not numbing.", "logic": "\nLaureate(morse)\nGory(morse)\nEpizoic(morse)\nNumbing(morse)\nNether(winni)\nPrototypal(winni)\nNumbing(jill)\nPrototypal(jill)\nWindswept(juliane)\nPrototypal(juliane)\nWindswept(morse) -> not Prototypal(morse)\nLaureate(morse) and Gory(morse) -> Nether(morse)\nforall x (Gory(x) and Prototypal(x) -> Windswept(x))\nforall x (Laureate(x) and Nether(x) -> Windswept(x))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) and Windswept(x) -> Gory(x))\nforall x (Gory(x) and Nether(x) -> Laureate(x))\nWindswept(juliane) -> not Epizoic(juliane)\nnot Epizoic(jill) -> Laureate(jill)\n\nnot Numbing(juliane)\n\nnot Numbing(juliane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Kania is divisive. Kania is plane. Kania is luxurious. Kania is inerrable. Sophey is unspotted. Sophey is gory. Cordelia is inerrable. Cordelia is gory. Ebba is analytic. Ebba is gory. If Kania is analytic then Kania is not gory. If Kania is divisive and Kania is plane then Kania is unspotted. Furry, gory things are analytic. Blue, unspotted things are analytic. If something is luxurious and analytic then it is plane. All plane, unspotted things are divisive. If Ebba is analytic then Ebba is not luxurious. If Cordelia is not luxurious then Cordelia is divisive. Cordelia is unspotted.", "logic": "\nDivisive(kania)\nPlane(kania)\nLuxurious(kania)\nInerrable(kania)\nUnspotted(sophey)\nGory(sophey)\nInerrable(cordelia)\nGory(cordelia)\nAnalytic(ebba)\nGory(ebba)\nAnalytic(kania) -> not Gory(kania)\nDivisive(kania) and Plane(kania) -> Unspotted(kania)\nforall x (Plane(x) and Gory(x) -> Analytic(x))\nforall x (Divisive(x) and Unspotted(x) -> Analytic(x))\nforall x (Luxurious(x) and Analytic(x) -> Plane(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) and Unspotted(x) -> Divisive(x))\nAnalytic(ebba) -> not Luxurious(ebba)\nnot Luxurious(cordelia) -> Divisive(cordelia)\n\nUnspotted(cordelia)\n\nUnspotted(cordelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "The ana is reconciled. The ana does not need the gil. The ana shower the gil. The gil champ the ana. The gil is categorial. The gil spice the ana. The gil shower the ana. If something shower the gil and the gil champ the ana then the ana is categorial. If something spice the ana and the ana spice the gil then it does not eat the ana. If something is categorial then it champ the ana. If the gil champ the ana and the gil spice the ana then the ana champ the gil. If something spice the gil then the gil does not see the ana. If something champ the ana then it shower the ana. The gil is categorial.", "logic": "\nReconciled(ana)\nnot Spice(ana, gil)\nShower(ana, gil)\nChamp(gil, ana)\nCategorial(gil)\nSpice(gil, ana)\nShower(gil, ana)\nforall x (Shower(x, gil) and Champ(gil, ana) -> Categorial(ana))\nforall x (Spice(x, ana) and Spice(ana, gil) -> not Champ(x, ana))\nforall x (Categorial(x) -> Champ(x, ana))\nChamp(gil, ana) and Spice(gil, ana) -> Champ(ana, gil)\nforall x (Spice(x, gil) -> not Shower(gil, ana))\nforall x (Champ(x, ana) -> Shower(x, ana))\n\nCategorial(gil)\n\ntherefore Categorial(gil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The melesa is saurian. The melesa does not need the justina. The melesa deduce the justina. The justina quilt the melesa. The justina is incan. The justina whimper the melesa. The justina deduce the melesa. If something deduce the justina and the justina quilt the melesa then the melesa is incan. If something whimper the melesa and the melesa whimper the justina then it does not eat the melesa. If something is incan then it quilt the melesa. If the justina quilt the melesa and the justina whimper the melesa then the melesa quilt the justina. If something whimper the justina then the justina does not see the melesa. If something quilt the melesa then it deduce the melesa. The justina is not incan.", "logic": "\nSaurian(melesa)\nnot Whimper(melesa, justina)\nDeduce(melesa, justina)\nQuilt(justina, melesa)\nIncan(justina)\nWhimper(justina, melesa)\nDeduce(justina, melesa)\nforall x (Deduce(x, justina) and Quilt(justina, melesa) -> Incan(melesa))\nforall x (Whimper(x, melesa) and Whimper(melesa, justina) -> not Quilt(x, melesa))\nforall x (Incan(x) -> Quilt(x, melesa))\nQuilt(justina, melesa) and Whimper(justina, melesa) -> Quilt(melesa, justina)\nforall x (Whimper(x, justina) -> not Deduce(justina, melesa))\nforall x (Quilt(x, melesa) -> Deduce(x, melesa))\n\nnot Incan(justina)\n\ntherefore Incan(justina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The constance is lxxviii. The constance does not need the nanon. The constance rankle the nanon. The nanon panic the constance. The nanon is stovepiped. The nanon proscribe the constance. The nanon rankle the constance. If something rankle the nanon and the nanon panic the constance then the constance is stovepiped. If something proscribe the constance and the constance proscribe the nanon then it does not eat the constance. If something is stovepiped then it panic the constance. If the nanon panic the constance and the nanon proscribe the constance then the constance panic the nanon. If something proscribe the nanon then the nanon does not see the constance. If something panic the constance then it rankle the constance. The constance panic the nanon.", "logic": "\nLxxviii(constance)\nnot Proscribe(constance, nanon)\nRankle(constance, nanon)\nPanic(nanon, constance)\nStovepiped(nanon)\nProscribe(nanon, constance)\nRankle(nanon, constance)\nforall x (Rankle(x, nanon) and Panic(nanon, constance) -> Stovepiped(constance))\nforall x (Proscribe(x, constance) and Proscribe(constance, nanon) -> not Panic(x, constance))\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Panic(x, constance))\nPanic(nanon, constance) and Proscribe(nanon, constance) -> Panic(constance, nanon)\nforall x (Proscribe(x, nanon) -> not Rankle(nanon, constance))\nforall x (Panic(x, constance) -> Rankle(x, constance))\n\nPanic(constance, nanon)\n\nPanic(nanon, constance) and Proscribe(nanon, constance) and Panic(nanon, constance) and Proscribe(nanon, constance) -> Panic(constance, nanon) -> therefore Panic(constance, nanon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The malva is slushy. The malva does not need the roseanna. The malva overleap the roseanna. The roseanna oppress the malva. The roseanna is prosy. The roseanna complete the malva. The roseanna overleap the malva. If something overleap the roseanna and the roseanna oppress the malva then the malva is prosy. If something complete the malva and the malva complete the roseanna then it does not eat the malva. If something is prosy then it oppress the malva. If the roseanna oppress the malva and the roseanna complete the malva then the malva oppress the roseanna. If something complete the roseanna then the roseanna does not see the malva. If something oppress the malva then it overleap the malva. The malva is not prosy.", "logic": "\nSlushy(malva)\nnot Complete(malva, roseanna)\nOverleap(malva, roseanna)\nOppress(roseanna, malva)\nProsy(roseanna)\nComplete(roseanna, malva)\nOverleap(roseanna, malva)\nforall x (Overleap(x, roseanna) and Oppress(roseanna, malva) -> Prosy(malva))\nforall x (Complete(x, malva) and Complete(malva, roseanna) -> not Oppress(x, malva))\nforall x (Prosy(x) -> Oppress(x, malva))\nOppress(roseanna, malva) and Complete(roseanna, malva) -> Oppress(malva, roseanna)\nforall x (Complete(x, roseanna) -> not Overleap(roseanna, malva))\nforall x (Oppress(x, malva) -> Overleap(x, malva))\n\nnot Prosy(malva)\n\nOverleap(malva, roseanna) and Oppress(roseanna, malva) and forall x (Overleap(x, roseanna) and Oppress(roseanna, malva) -> Prosy(malva)) -> therefore Prosy(malva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The erminia is changeable. The erminia does not need the stephanie. The erminia gravitate the stephanie. The stephanie nitrate the erminia. The stephanie is dinky. The stephanie unchurch the erminia. The stephanie gravitate the erminia. If something gravitate the stephanie and the stephanie nitrate the erminia then the erminia is dinky. If something unchurch the erminia and the erminia unchurch the stephanie then it does not eat the erminia. If something is dinky then it nitrate the erminia. If the stephanie nitrate the erminia and the stephanie unchurch the erminia then the erminia nitrate the stephanie. If something unchurch the stephanie then the stephanie does not see the erminia. If something nitrate the erminia then it gravitate the erminia. The erminia nitrate the erminia.", "logic": "\nChangeable(erminia)\nnot Unchurch(erminia, stephanie)\nGravitate(erminia, stephanie)\nNitrate(stephanie, erminia)\nDinky(stephanie)\nUnchurch(stephanie, erminia)\nGravitate(stephanie, erminia)\nforall x (Gravitate(x, stephanie) and Nitrate(stephanie, erminia) -> Dinky(erminia))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, erminia) and Unchurch(erminia, stephanie) -> not Nitrate(x, erminia))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Nitrate(x, erminia))\nNitrate(stephanie, erminia) and Unchurch(stephanie, erminia) -> Nitrate(erminia, stephanie)\nforall x (Unchurch(x, stephanie) -> not Gravitate(stephanie, erminia))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, erminia) -> Gravitate(x, erminia))\n\nNitrate(erminia, erminia)\n\nGravitate(erminia, stephanie) and Nitrate(stephanie, erminia) and forall x (Gravitate(x, stephanie) and Nitrate(stephanie, erminia) -> Dinky(erminia)) -> therefore Dinky(erminia) Dinky(erminia) and forall x (Dinky(x) -> Nitrate(x, erminia)) -> therefore Nitrate(erminia, erminia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The wilie is tyrolean. The wilie does not need the phyllida. The wilie customise the phyllida. The phyllida intuit the wilie. The phyllida is silty. The phyllida tiller the wilie. The phyllida customise the wilie. If something customise the phyllida and the phyllida intuit the wilie then the wilie is silty. If something tiller the wilie and the wilie tiller the phyllida then it does not eat the wilie. If something is silty then it intuit the wilie. If the phyllida intuit the wilie and the phyllida tiller the wilie then the wilie intuit the phyllida. If something tiller the phyllida then the phyllida does not see the wilie. If something intuit the wilie then it customise the wilie. The wilie does not eat the wilie.", "logic": "\nTyrolean(wilie)\nnot Tiller(wilie, phyllida)\nCustomise(wilie, phyllida)\nIntuit(phyllida, wilie)\nSilty(phyllida)\nTiller(phyllida, wilie)\nCustomise(phyllida, wilie)\nforall x (Customise(x, phyllida) and Intuit(phyllida, wilie) -> Silty(wilie))\nforall x (Tiller(x, wilie) and Tiller(wilie, phyllida) -> not Intuit(x, wilie))\nforall x (Silty(x) -> Intuit(x, wilie))\nIntuit(phyllida, wilie) and Tiller(phyllida, wilie) -> Intuit(wilie, phyllida)\nforall x (Tiller(x, phyllida) -> not Customise(phyllida, wilie))\nforall x (Intuit(x, wilie) -> Customise(x, wilie))\n\nnot Intuit(wilie, wilie)\n\nCustomise(wilie, phyllida) and Intuit(phyllida, wilie) and forall x (Customise(x, phyllida) and Intuit(phyllida, wilie) -> Silty(wilie)) -> therefore Silty(wilie) Silty(wilie) and forall x (Silty(x) -> Intuit(x, wilie)) -> therefore Intuit(wilie, wilie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The cris is spunky. The cris does not need the marcel. The cris imagine the marcel. The marcel embroil the cris. The marcel is amused. The marcel aphorize the cris. The marcel imagine the cris. If something imagine the marcel and the marcel embroil the cris then the cris is amused. If something aphorize the cris and the cris aphorize the marcel then it does not eat the cris. If something is amused then it embroil the cris. If the marcel embroil the cris and the marcel aphorize the cris then the cris embroil the marcel. If something aphorize the marcel then the marcel does not see the cris. If something embroil the cris then it imagine the cris. The cris imagine the cris.", "logic": "\nSpunky(cris)\nnot Aphorize(cris, marcel)\nImagine(cris, marcel)\nEmbroil(marcel, cris)\nAmused(marcel)\nAphorize(marcel, cris)\nImagine(marcel, cris)\nforall x (Imagine(x, marcel) and Embroil(marcel, cris) -> Amused(cris))\nforall x (Aphorize(x, cris) and Aphorize(cris, marcel) -> not Embroil(x, cris))\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Embroil(x, cris))\nEmbroil(marcel, cris) and Aphorize(marcel, cris) -> Embroil(cris, marcel)\nforall x (Aphorize(x, marcel) -> not Imagine(marcel, cris))\nforall x (Embroil(x, cris) -> Imagine(x, cris))\n\nImagine(cris, cris)\n\nImagine(cris, marcel) and Embroil(marcel, cris) and forall x (Imagine(x, marcel) and Embroil(marcel, cris) -> Amused(cris)) -> therefore Amused(cris) Amused(cris) and forall x (Amused(x) -> Embroil(x, cris)) -> therefore Embroil(cris, cris) Embroil(cris, cris) and forall x (Embroil(x, cris) -> Imagine(x, cris)) -> therefore Imagine(cris, cris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The mandi is theist. The mandi does not need the spencer. The mandi face the spencer. The spencer attribute the mandi. The spencer is amazed. The spencer sniff the mandi. The spencer face the mandi. If something face the spencer and the spencer attribute the mandi then the mandi is amazed. If something sniff the mandi and the mandi sniff the spencer then it does not eat the mandi. If something is amazed then it attribute the mandi. If the spencer attribute the mandi and the spencer sniff the mandi then the mandi attribute the spencer. If something sniff the spencer then the spencer does not see the mandi. If something attribute the mandi then it face the mandi. The mandi does not see the mandi.", "logic": "\nTheist(mandi)\nnot Sniff(mandi, spencer)\nFace(mandi, spencer)\nAttribute(spencer, mandi)\nAmazed(spencer)\nSniff(spencer, mandi)\nFace(spencer, mandi)\nforall x (Face(x, spencer) and Attribute(spencer, mandi) -> Amazed(mandi))\nforall x (Sniff(x, mandi) and Sniff(mandi, spencer) -> not Attribute(x, mandi))\nforall x (Amazed(x) -> Attribute(x, mandi))\nAttribute(spencer, mandi) and Sniff(spencer, mandi) -> Attribute(mandi, spencer)\nforall x (Sniff(x, spencer) -> not Face(spencer, mandi))\nforall x (Attribute(x, mandi) -> Face(x, mandi))\n\nnot Face(mandi, mandi)\n\nFace(mandi, spencer) and Attribute(spencer, mandi) and forall x (Face(x, spencer) and Attribute(spencer, mandi) -> Amazed(mandi)) -> therefore Amazed(mandi) Amazed(mandi) and forall x (Amazed(x) -> Attribute(x, mandi)) -> therefore Attribute(mandi, mandi) Attribute(mandi, mandi) and forall x (Attribute(x, mandi) -> Face(x, mandi)) -> therefore Face(mandi, mandi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The chrysler is unstinted. The chrysler does not need the llewellyn. The chrysler tingle the llewellyn. The llewellyn regulate the chrysler. The llewellyn is bootless. The llewellyn beset the chrysler. The llewellyn tingle the chrysler. If something tingle the llewellyn and the llewellyn regulate the chrysler then the chrysler is bootless. If something beset the chrysler and the chrysler beset the llewellyn then it does not eat the chrysler. If something is bootless then it regulate the chrysler. If the llewellyn regulate the chrysler and the llewellyn beset the chrysler then the chrysler regulate the llewellyn. If something beset the llewellyn then the llewellyn does not see the chrysler. If something regulate the chrysler then it tingle the chrysler. The llewellyn does not see the llewellyn.", "logic": "\nUnstinted(chrysler)\nnot Beset(chrysler, llewellyn)\nTingle(chrysler, llewellyn)\nRegulate(llewellyn, chrysler)\nBootless(llewellyn)\nBeset(llewellyn, chrysler)\nTingle(llewellyn, chrysler)\nforall x (Tingle(x, llewellyn) and Regulate(llewellyn, chrysler) -> Bootless(chrysler))\nforall x (Beset(x, chrysler) and Beset(chrysler, llewellyn) -> not Regulate(x, chrysler))\nforall x (Bootless(x) -> Regulate(x, chrysler))\nRegulate(llewellyn, chrysler) and Beset(llewellyn, chrysler) -> Regulate(chrysler, llewellyn)\nforall x (Beset(x, llewellyn) -> not Tingle(llewellyn, chrysler))\nforall x (Regulate(x, chrysler) -> Tingle(x, chrysler))\n\nnot Tingle(llewellyn, llewellyn)\n\nnot Tingle(llewellyn, llewellyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The taddeo is pudendal. The taddeo does not need the jared. The taddeo grow the jared. The jared optimise the taddeo. The jared is pelvic. The jared compass the taddeo. The jared grow the taddeo. If something grow the jared and the jared optimise the taddeo then the taddeo is pelvic. If something compass the taddeo and the taddeo compass the jared then it does not eat the taddeo. If something is pelvic then it optimise the taddeo. If the jared optimise the taddeo and the jared compass the taddeo then the taddeo optimise the jared. If something compass the jared then the jared does not see the taddeo. If something optimise the taddeo then it grow the taddeo. The jared optimise the jared.", "logic": "\nPudendal(taddeo)\nnot Compass(taddeo, jared)\nGrow(taddeo, jared)\nOptimise(jared, taddeo)\nPelvic(jared)\nCompass(jared, taddeo)\nGrow(jared, taddeo)\nforall x (Grow(x, jared) and Optimise(jared, taddeo) -> Pelvic(taddeo))\nforall x (Compass(x, taddeo) and Compass(taddeo, jared) -> not Optimise(x, taddeo))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) -> Optimise(x, taddeo))\nOptimise(jared, taddeo) and Compass(jared, taddeo) -> Optimise(taddeo, jared)\nforall x (Compass(x, jared) -> not Grow(jared, taddeo))\nforall x (Optimise(x, taddeo) -> Grow(x, taddeo))\n\nOptimise(jared, jared)\n\nOptimise(jared, jared) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The wheeler is redheaded. The wheeler does not need the lowell. The wheeler eject the lowell. The lowell ballyhoo the wheeler. The lowell is colourless. The lowell kindle the wheeler. The lowell eject the wheeler. If something eject the lowell and the lowell ballyhoo the wheeler then the wheeler is colourless. If something kindle the wheeler and the wheeler kindle the lowell then it does not eat the wheeler. If something is colourless then it ballyhoo the wheeler. If the lowell ballyhoo the wheeler and the lowell kindle the wheeler then the wheeler ballyhoo the lowell. If something kindle the lowell then the lowell does not see the wheeler. If something ballyhoo the wheeler then it eject the wheeler. The lowell does not need the lowell.", "logic": "\nRedheaded(wheeler)\nnot Kindle(wheeler, lowell)\nEject(wheeler, lowell)\nBallyhoo(lowell, wheeler)\nColourless(lowell)\nKindle(lowell, wheeler)\nEject(lowell, wheeler)\nforall x (Eject(x, lowell) and Ballyhoo(lowell, wheeler) -> Colourless(wheeler))\nforall x (Kindle(x, wheeler) and Kindle(wheeler, lowell) -> not Ballyhoo(x, wheeler))\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Ballyhoo(x, wheeler))\nBallyhoo(lowell, wheeler) and Kindle(lowell, wheeler) -> Ballyhoo(wheeler, lowell)\nforall x (Kindle(x, lowell) -> not Eject(lowell, wheeler))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, wheeler) -> Eject(x, wheeler))\n\nnot Kindle(lowell, lowell)\n\nnot Kindle(lowell, lowell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The zoe is aortic. The zoe does not need the marline. The zoe overlay the marline. The marline plump the zoe. The marline is acquired. The marline protrude the zoe. The marline overlay the zoe. If something overlay the marline and the marline plump the zoe then the zoe is acquired. If something protrude the zoe and the zoe protrude the marline then it does not eat the zoe. If something is acquired then it plump the zoe. If the marline plump the zoe and the marline protrude the zoe then the zoe plump the marline. If something protrude the marline then the marline does not see the zoe. If something plump the zoe then it overlay the zoe. The marline is aortic.", "logic": "\nAortic(zoe)\nnot Protrude(zoe, marline)\nOverlay(zoe, marline)\nPlump(marline, zoe)\nAcquired(marline)\nProtrude(marline, zoe)\nOverlay(marline, zoe)\nforall x (Overlay(x, marline) and Plump(marline, zoe) -> Acquired(zoe))\nforall x (Protrude(x, zoe) and Protrude(zoe, marline) -> not Plump(x, zoe))\nforall x (Acquired(x) -> Plump(x, zoe))\nPlump(marline, zoe) and Protrude(marline, zoe) -> Plump(zoe, marline)\nforall x (Protrude(x, marline) -> not Overlay(marline, zoe))\nforall x (Plump(x, zoe) -> Overlay(x, zoe))\n\nAortic(marline)\n\nAortic(marline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The lindsey is wondrous. The lindsey does not need the ranice. The lindsey stone the ranice. The ranice brooch the lindsey. The ranice is unheeding. The ranice humify the lindsey. The ranice stone the lindsey. If something stone the ranice and the ranice brooch the lindsey then the lindsey is unheeding. If something humify the lindsey and the lindsey humify the ranice then it does not eat the lindsey. If something is unheeding then it brooch the lindsey. If the ranice brooch the lindsey and the ranice humify the lindsey then the lindsey brooch the ranice. If something humify the ranice then the ranice does not see the lindsey. If something brooch the lindsey then it stone the lindsey. The ranice is not rough.", "logic": "\nWondrous(lindsey)\nnot Humify(lindsey, ranice)\nStone(lindsey, ranice)\nBrooch(ranice, lindsey)\nUnheeding(ranice)\nHumify(ranice, lindsey)\nStone(ranice, lindsey)\nforall x (Stone(x, ranice) and Brooch(ranice, lindsey) -> Unheeding(lindsey))\nforall x (Humify(x, lindsey) and Humify(lindsey, ranice) -> not Brooch(x, lindsey))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) -> Brooch(x, lindsey))\nBrooch(ranice, lindsey) and Humify(ranice, lindsey) -> Brooch(lindsey, ranice)\nforall x (Humify(x, ranice) -> not Stone(ranice, lindsey))\nforall x (Brooch(x, lindsey) -> Stone(x, lindsey))\n\nnot Rough(ranice)\n\nnot Rough(ranice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The aharon is heretical. The aharon does not need the matthias. The aharon declaw the matthias. The matthias cabin the aharon. The matthias is peppery. The matthias schuss the aharon. The matthias declaw the aharon. If something declaw the matthias and the matthias cabin the aharon then the aharon is peppery. If something schuss the aharon and the aharon schuss the matthias then it does not eat the aharon. If something is peppery then it cabin the aharon. If the matthias cabin the aharon and the matthias schuss the aharon then the aharon cabin the matthias. If something schuss the matthias then the matthias does not see the aharon. If something cabin the aharon then it declaw the aharon. The aharon is green.", "logic": "\nHeretical(aharon)\nnot Schuss(aharon, matthias)\nDeclaw(aharon, matthias)\nCabin(matthias, aharon)\nPeppery(matthias)\nSchuss(matthias, aharon)\nDeclaw(matthias, aharon)\nforall x (Declaw(x, matthias) and Cabin(matthias, aharon) -> Peppery(aharon))\nforall x (Schuss(x, aharon) and Schuss(aharon, matthias) -> not Cabin(x, aharon))\nforall x (Peppery(x) -> Cabin(x, aharon))\nCabin(matthias, aharon) and Schuss(matthias, aharon) -> Cabin(aharon, matthias)\nforall x (Schuss(x, matthias) -> not Declaw(matthias, aharon))\nforall x (Cabin(x, aharon) -> Declaw(x, aharon))\n\nGreen(aharon)\n\nGreen(aharon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The vern is systemic. The vern does not need the ame. The vern cock the ame. The ame chiromance the vern. The ame is votive. The ame speck the vern. The ame cock the vern. If something cock the ame and the ame chiromance the vern then the vern is votive. If something speck the vern and the vern speck the ame then it does not eat the vern. If something is votive then it chiromance the vern. If the ame chiromance the vern and the ame speck the vern then the vern chiromance the ame. If something speck the ame then the ame does not see the vern. If something chiromance the vern then it cock the vern. The ame is not kind.", "logic": "\nSystemic(vern)\nnot Speck(vern, ame)\nCock(vern, ame)\nChiromance(ame, vern)\nVotive(ame)\nSpeck(ame, vern)\nCock(ame, vern)\nforall x (Cock(x, ame) and Chiromance(ame, vern) -> Votive(vern))\nforall x (Speck(x, vern) and Speck(vern, ame) -> not Chiromance(x, vern))\nforall x (Votive(x) -> Chiromance(x, vern))\nChiromance(ame, vern) and Speck(ame, vern) -> Chiromance(vern, ame)\nforall x (Speck(x, ame) -> not Cock(ame, vern))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, vern) -> Cock(x, vern))\n\nnot Kind(ame)\n\nnot Kind(ame) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The darrick is datable. The darrick does not need the davidde. The darrick whiff the davidde. The davidde prepossess the darrick. The davidde is succinic. The davidde recapture the darrick. The davidde whiff the darrick. If something whiff the davidde and the davidde prepossess the darrick then the darrick is succinic. If something recapture the darrick and the darrick recapture the davidde then it does not eat the darrick. If something is succinic then it prepossess the darrick. If the davidde prepossess the darrick and the davidde recapture the darrick then the darrick prepossess the davidde. If something recapture the davidde then the davidde does not see the darrick. If something prepossess the darrick then it whiff the darrick. The darrick recapture the darrick.", "logic": "\nDatable(darrick)\nnot Recapture(darrick, davidde)\nWhiff(darrick, davidde)\nPrepossess(davidde, darrick)\nSuccinic(davidde)\nRecapture(davidde, darrick)\nWhiff(davidde, darrick)\nforall x (Whiff(x, davidde) and Prepossess(davidde, darrick) -> Succinic(darrick))\nforall x (Recapture(x, darrick) and Recapture(darrick, davidde) -> not Prepossess(x, darrick))\nforall x (Succinic(x) -> Prepossess(x, darrick))\nPrepossess(davidde, darrick) and Recapture(davidde, darrick) -> Prepossess(darrick, davidde)\nforall x (Recapture(x, davidde) -> not Whiff(davidde, darrick))\nforall x (Prepossess(x, darrick) -> Whiff(x, darrick))\n\nRecapture(darrick, darrick)\n\nRecapture(darrick, darrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "Benedict is drunken. Ulric is not looking. Braden is depictive. All patient people are drunken. Kind people are drunken. Blue people are pacific. Kind, depictive people are pacific. If someone is patient then they are sinhala. If Braden is depictive then Braden is cuticular. All cuticular people are patient. If someone is depictive and not patient then they are looking. Ulric is not looking.", "logic": "\nDrunken(benedict)\nnot Looking(ulric)\nDepictive(braden)\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Patient(x) and Depictive(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nDepictive(braden) -> Cuticular(braden)\nforall x (Cuticular(x) -> Patient(x))\nforall x (Depictive(x) and not Patient(x) -> Looking(x))\n\nnot Looking(ulric)\n\ntherefore not Looking(ulric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Josef is clitoral. Avril is not rallying. Tobiah is corky. All unbooked people are clitoral. Kind people are clitoral. Blue people are unmanned. Kind, corky people are unmanned. If someone is unbooked then they are adorned. If Tobiah is corky then Tobiah is lethargic. All lethargic people are unbooked. If someone is corky and not unbooked then they are rallying. Josef is not clitoral.", "logic": "\nClitoral(josef)\nnot Rallying(avril)\nCorky(tobiah)\nforall x (Unbooked(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Adorned(x) -> Unmanned(x))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) and Corky(x) -> Unmanned(x))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) -> Adorned(x))\nCorky(tobiah) -> Lethargic(tobiah)\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Unbooked(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) and not Unbooked(x) -> Rallying(x))\n\nnot Clitoral(josef)\n\ntherefore Clitoral(josef)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Todd is drizzly. Ashlie is not archaistic. Breanne is runaway. All collegial people are drizzly. Kind people are drizzly. Blue people are fortuitous. Kind, runaway people are fortuitous. If someone is collegial then they are skintight. If Breanne is runaway then Breanne is icteric. All icteric people are collegial. If someone is runaway and not collegial then they are archaistic. Breanne is icteric.", "logic": "\nDrizzly(todd)\nnot Archaistic(ashlie)\nRunaway(breanne)\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Drizzly(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Drizzly(x))\nforall x (Skintight(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) and Runaway(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Skintight(x))\nRunaway(breanne) -> Icteric(breanne)\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> Collegial(x))\nforall x (Runaway(x) and not Collegial(x) -> Archaistic(x))\n\nIcteric(breanne)\n\nRunaway(breanne) and Runaway(breanne) -> Icteric(breanne) -> therefore Icteric(breanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Helmuth is formless. Horst is not elfin. Adi is monochrome. All diminutive people are formless. Kind people are formless. Blue people are muslim. Kind, monochrome people are muslim. If someone is diminutive then they are menstrual. If Adi is monochrome then Adi is flowering. All flowering people are diminutive. If someone is monochrome and not diminutive then they are elfin. Adi is not flowering.", "logic": "\nFormless(helmuth)\nnot Elfin(horst)\nMonochrome(adi)\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Formless(x))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Formless(x))\nforall x (Menstrual(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) and Monochrome(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nMonochrome(adi) -> Flowering(adi)\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) and not Diminutive(x) -> Elfin(x))\n\nnot Flowering(adi)\n\nMonochrome(adi) and Monochrome(adi) -> Flowering(adi) -> therefore Flowering(adi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Cabrina is prudish. Mame is not cerulean. Devondra is monandrous. All bestial people are prudish. Kind people are prudish. Blue people are schizoid. Kind, monandrous people are schizoid. If someone is bestial then they are closed. If Devondra is monandrous then Devondra is undefiled. All undefiled people are bestial. If someone is monandrous and not bestial then they are cerulean. Devondra is bestial.", "logic": "\nPrudish(cabrina)\nnot Cerulean(mame)\nMonandrous(devondra)\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Prudish(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Prudish(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) and Monandrous(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Closed(x))\nMonandrous(devondra) -> Undefiled(devondra)\nforall x (Undefiled(x) -> Bestial(x))\nforall x (Monandrous(x) and not Bestial(x) -> Cerulean(x))\n\nBestial(devondra)\n\nMonandrous(devondra) and Monandrous(devondra) -> Undefiled(devondra) -> therefore Undefiled(devondra) Undefiled(devondra) and forall x (Undefiled(x) -> Bestial(x)) -> therefore Bestial(devondra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Gabe is obovate. Stephenie is not senseless. Dyane is acinic. All antimonic people are obovate. Kind people are obovate. Blue people are bilgy. Kind, acinic people are bilgy. If someone is antimonic then they are entozoan. If Dyane is acinic then Dyane is periwigged. All periwigged people are antimonic. If someone is acinic and not antimonic then they are senseless. Dyane is not antimonic.", "logic": "\nObovate(gabe)\nnot Senseless(stephenie)\nAcinic(dyane)\nforall x (Antimonic(x) -> Obovate(x))\nforall x (Antimonic(x) -> Obovate(x))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Antimonic(x) and Acinic(x) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Antimonic(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nAcinic(dyane) -> Periwigged(dyane)\nforall x (Periwigged(x) -> Antimonic(x))\nforall x (Acinic(x) and not Antimonic(x) -> Senseless(x))\n\nnot Antimonic(dyane)\n\nAcinic(dyane) and Acinic(dyane) -> Periwigged(dyane) -> therefore Periwigged(dyane) Periwigged(dyane) and forall x (Periwigged(x) -> Antimonic(x)) -> therefore Antimonic(dyane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Aura is epiphyseal. Trevor is not postwar. Peirce is unripened. All eastbound people are epiphyseal. Kind people are epiphyseal. Blue people are paranormal. Kind, unripened people are paranormal. If someone is eastbound then they are immobile. If Peirce is unripened then Peirce is excusatory. All excusatory people are eastbound. If someone is unripened and not eastbound then they are postwar. Peirce is immobile.", "logic": "\nEpiphyseal(aura)\nnot Postwar(trevor)\nUnripened(peirce)\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Epiphyseal(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Epiphyseal(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) -> Paranormal(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) and Unripened(x) -> Paranormal(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Immobile(x))\nUnripened(peirce) -> Excusatory(peirce)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Eastbound(x))\nforall x (Unripened(x) and not Eastbound(x) -> Postwar(x))\n\nImmobile(peirce)\n\nUnripened(peirce) and Unripened(peirce) -> Excusatory(peirce) -> therefore Excusatory(peirce) Excusatory(peirce) and forall x (Excusatory(x) -> Eastbound(x)) -> therefore Eastbound(peirce) Eastbound(peirce) and forall x (Eastbound(x) -> Immobile(x)) -> therefore Immobile(peirce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Zandra is strict. Roz is not chthonic. Judye is trusting. All hectic people are strict. Kind people are strict. Blue people are stock. Kind, trusting people are stock. If someone is hectic then they are palpatory. If Judye is trusting then Judye is aired. All aired people are hectic. If someone is trusting and not hectic then they are chthonic. Judye is not stock.", "logic": "\nStrict(zandra)\nnot Chthonic(roz)\nTrusting(judye)\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Strict(x))\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Strict(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Hectic(x) and Trusting(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Palpatory(x))\nTrusting(judye) -> Aired(judye)\nforall x (Aired(x) -> Hectic(x))\nforall x (Trusting(x) and not Hectic(x) -> Chthonic(x))\n\nnot Stock(judye)\n\nTrusting(judye) and Trusting(judye) -> Aired(judye) -> therefore Aired(judye) Aired(judye) and forall x (Aired(x) -> Hectic(x)) -> therefore Hectic(judye) Hectic(judye) and Trusting(judye) and forall x (Hectic(x) and Trusting(x) -> Stock(x)) -> therefore Stock(judye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Tiffy is lecherous. Bertrand is not unassuming. Sandor is voracious. All useless people are lecherous. Kind people are lecherous. Blue people are untenanted. Kind, voracious people are untenanted. If someone is useless then they are vitrified. If Sandor is voracious then Sandor is empathetic. All empathetic people are useless. If someone is voracious and not useless then they are unassuming. Bertrand is not vitrified.", "logic": "\nLecherous(tiffy)\nnot Unassuming(bertrand)\nVoracious(sandor)\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nforall x (Vitrified(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) and Voracious(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Vitrified(x))\nVoracious(sandor) -> Empathetic(sandor)\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Useless(x))\nforall x (Voracious(x) and not Useless(x) -> Unassuming(x))\n\nnot Vitrified(bertrand)\n\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Vitrified(x)) <- forall x (Empathetic(x) -> Useless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Bertrand is opencast. Valentin is not used. Rosemonde is jade. All unmined people are opencast. Kind people are opencast. Blue people are inordinate. Kind, jade people are inordinate. If someone is unmined then they are unfitting. If Rosemonde is jade then Rosemonde is cardiac. All cardiac people are unmined. If someone is jade and not unmined then they are used. Rosemonde is used.", "logic": "\nOpencast(bertrand)\nnot Used(valentin)\nJade(rosemonde)\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> Opencast(x))\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> Opencast(x))\nforall x (Unfitting(x) -> Inordinate(x))\nforall x (Unmined(x) and Jade(x) -> Inordinate(x))\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> Unfitting(x))\nJade(rosemonde) -> Cardiac(rosemonde)\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Unmined(x))\nforall x (Jade(x) and not Unmined(x) -> Used(x))\n\nUsed(rosemonde)\n\nforall x (Jade(x) and not Unmined(x) -> Used(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Rosamund is hired. Sheree is not ukrainian. Marti is voluminous. All columbian people are hired. Kind people are hired. Blue people are bistred. Kind, voluminous people are bistred. If someone is columbian then they are duodenal. If Marti is voluminous then Marti is stressed. All stressed people are columbian. If someone is voluminous and not columbian then they are ukrainian. Rosamund is not columbian.", "logic": "\nHired(rosamund)\nnot Ukrainian(sheree)\nVoluminous(marti)\nforall x (Columbian(x) -> Hired(x))\nforall x (Columbian(x) -> Hired(x))\nforall x (Duodenal(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Columbian(x) and Voluminous(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Columbian(x) -> Duodenal(x))\nVoluminous(marti) -> Stressed(marti)\nforall x (Stressed(x) -> Columbian(x))\nforall x (Voluminous(x) and not Columbian(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\n\nnot Columbian(rosamund)\n\nforall x (Stressed(x) -> Columbian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Rorie is lacking. Wynny is not tangerine. Katuscha is libidinous. All disjointed people are lacking. Kind people are lacking. Blue people are proven. Kind, libidinous people are proven. If someone is disjointed then they are shared. If Katuscha is libidinous then Katuscha is based. All based people are disjointed. If someone is libidinous and not disjointed then they are tangerine. Rorie is proven.", "logic": "\nLacking(rorie)\nnot Tangerine(wynny)\nLibidinous(katuscha)\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Lacking(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Lacking(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) -> Proven(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) and Libidinous(x) -> Proven(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Shared(x))\nLibidinous(katuscha) -> Based(katuscha)\nforall x (Based(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Libidinous(x) and not Disjointed(x) -> Tangerine(x))\n\nProven(rorie)\n\nforall x (Shared(x) -> Proven(x)) <- forall x (Disjointed(x) -> Shared(x)) <- forall x (Based(x) -> Disjointed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Claudio is narrow. Inger is not metallike. Julie is elongate. All agape people are narrow. Kind people are narrow. Blue people are super. Kind, elongate people are super. If someone is agape then they are anthropoid. If Julie is elongate then Julie is triclinic. All triclinic people are agape. If someone is elongate and not agape then they are metallike. Claudio is not elongate.", "logic": "\nNarrow(claudio)\nnot Metallike(inger)\nElongate(julie)\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Narrow(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Narrow(x))\nforall x (Anthropoid(x) -> Super(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) and Elongate(x) -> Super(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Anthropoid(x))\nElongate(julie) -> Triclinic(julie)\nforall x (Triclinic(x) -> Agape(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) and not Agape(x) -> Metallike(x))\n\nnot Elongate(claudio)\n\nnot Elongate(claudio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Hamil is foetal. Antin is not bacchic. Camilla is balmy. All uterine people are foetal. Kind people are foetal. Blue people are wordy. Kind, balmy people are wordy. If someone is uterine then they are opencut. If Camilla is balmy then Camilla is unavenged. All unavenged people are uterine. If someone is balmy and not uterine then they are bacchic. Hamil is unavenged.", "logic": "\nFoetal(hamil)\nnot Bacchic(antin)\nBalmy(camilla)\nforall x (Uterine(x) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Uterine(x) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Uterine(x) and Balmy(x) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Uterine(x) -> Opencut(x))\nBalmy(camilla) -> Unavenged(camilla)\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> Uterine(x))\nforall x (Balmy(x) and not Uterine(x) -> Bacchic(x))\n\nUnavenged(hamil)\n\nUnavenged(hamil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Kendra is fourfold. Mia is not aeronautic. Michal is teetotal. All chian people are fourfold. Kind people are fourfold. Blue people are synclinal. Kind, teetotal people are synclinal. If someone is chian then they are teentsy. If Michal is teetotal then Michal is soft. All soft people are chian. If someone is teetotal and not chian then they are aeronautic. Mia is not soft.", "logic": "\nFourfold(kendra)\nnot Aeronautic(mia)\nTeetotal(michal)\nforall x (Chian(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nforall x (Chian(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nforall x (Teentsy(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Chian(x) and Teetotal(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Chian(x) -> Teentsy(x))\nTeetotal(michal) -> Soft(michal)\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Chian(x))\nforall x (Teetotal(x) and not Chian(x) -> Aeronautic(x))\n\nnot Soft(mia)\n\nnot Soft(mia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Felix is lxxxvi. Brice is not newsy. Noel is palpebrate. All used people are lxxxvi. Kind people are lxxxvi. Blue people are magenta. Kind, palpebrate people are magenta. If someone is used then they are deciphered. If Noel is palpebrate then Noel is completed. All completed people are used. If someone is palpebrate and not used then they are newsy. Brice is palpebrate.", "logic": "\nLxxxvi(felix)\nnot Newsy(brice)\nPalpebrate(noel)\nforall x (Used(x) -> Lxxxvi(x))\nforall x (Used(x) -> Lxxxvi(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) -> Magenta(x))\nforall x (Used(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Magenta(x))\nforall x (Used(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nPalpebrate(noel) -> Completed(noel)\nforall x (Completed(x) -> Used(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and not Used(x) -> Newsy(x))\n\nPalpebrate(brice)\n\nPalpebrate(brice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "The mei is not prolonged. The natalya is prolonged. The natalya debar the felix. The natalya ripen the mei. The minta is not prolonged. The minta is robotic. The minta improvize the natalya. The minta ripen the natalya. The felix is proximate. The felix improvize the natalya. If someone ripen the felix and the felix is not enmeshed then they like the mei. If the felix ripen the mei and the felix is proximate then the mei is robotic. If someone is robotic then they do not like the felix. If the felix is proximate then the felix ripen the mei. If someone debar the felix then they do not see the mei. If someone improvize the felix then the felix improvize the mei. The minta is not prolonged.", "logic": "\nnot Prolonged(mei)\nProlonged(natalya)\nDebar(natalya, felix)\nRipen(natalya, mei)\nnot Prolonged(minta)\nRobotic(minta)\nImprovize(minta, natalya)\nRipen(minta, natalya)\nProximate(felix)\nImprovize(felix, natalya)\nforall x (Ripen(x, felix) and not Enmeshed(felix) -> Debar(x, mei))\nRipen(felix, mei) and Proximate(felix) -> Robotic(mei)\nforall x (Robotic(x) -> not Debar(x, felix))\nProximate(felix) -> Ripen(felix, mei)\nforall x (Debar(x, felix) -> not Improvize(x, mei))\nforall x (Improvize(x, felix) -> Improvize(felix, mei))\n\nnot Prolonged(minta)\n\ntherefore not Prolonged(minta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The isabel is not grapey. The madella is grapey. The madella master the aristotle. The madella enlist the isabel. The patrik is not grapey. The patrik is insipid. The patrik fellate the madella. The patrik enlist the madella. The aristotle is impersonal. The aristotle fellate the madella. If someone enlist the aristotle and the aristotle is not nonlinear then they like the isabel. If the aristotle enlist the isabel and the aristotle is impersonal then the isabel is insipid. If someone is insipid then they do not like the aristotle. If the aristotle is impersonal then the aristotle enlist the isabel. If someone master the aristotle then they do not see the isabel. If someone fellate the aristotle then the aristotle fellate the isabel. The patrik does not visit the madella.", "logic": "\nnot Grapey(isabel)\nGrapey(madella)\nMaster(madella, aristotle)\nEnlist(madella, isabel)\nnot Grapey(patrik)\nInsipid(patrik)\nFellate(patrik, madella)\nEnlist(patrik, madella)\nImpersonal(aristotle)\nFellate(aristotle, madella)\nforall x (Enlist(x, aristotle) and not Nonlinear(aristotle) -> Master(x, isabel))\nEnlist(aristotle, isabel) and Impersonal(aristotle) -> Insipid(isabel)\nforall x (Insipid(x) -> not Master(x, aristotle))\nImpersonal(aristotle) -> Enlist(aristotle, isabel)\nforall x (Master(x, aristotle) -> not Fellate(x, isabel))\nforall x (Fellate(x, aristotle) -> Fellate(aristotle, isabel))\n\nnot Enlist(patrik, madella)\n\ntherefore Enlist(patrik, madella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The frankie is not afferent. The anabelle is afferent. The anabelle befog the julio. The anabelle ready the frankie. The guendolen is not afferent. The guendolen is spicy. The guendolen uproot the anabelle. The guendolen ready the anabelle. The julio is fatheaded. The julio uproot the anabelle. If someone ready the julio and the julio is not hadal then they like the frankie. If the julio ready the frankie and the julio is fatheaded then the frankie is spicy. If someone is spicy then they do not like the julio. If the julio is fatheaded then the julio ready the frankie. If someone befog the julio then they do not see the frankie. If someone uproot the julio then the julio uproot the frankie. The anabelle does not see the frankie.", "logic": "\nnot Afferent(frankie)\nAfferent(anabelle)\nBefog(anabelle, julio)\nReady(anabelle, frankie)\nnot Afferent(guendolen)\nSpicy(guendolen)\nUproot(guendolen, anabelle)\nReady(guendolen, anabelle)\nFatheaded(julio)\nUproot(julio, anabelle)\nforall x (Ready(x, julio) and not Hadal(julio) -> Befog(x, frankie))\nReady(julio, frankie) and Fatheaded(julio) -> Spicy(frankie)\nforall x (Spicy(x) -> not Befog(x, julio))\nFatheaded(julio) -> Ready(julio, frankie)\nforall x (Befog(x, julio) -> not Uproot(x, frankie))\nforall x (Uproot(x, julio) -> Uproot(julio, frankie))\n\nnot Uproot(anabelle, frankie)\n\nBefog(anabelle, julio) and forall x (Befog(x, julio) -> not Uproot(x, frankie)) -> therefore not Uproot(anabelle, frankie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The merrill is not daisylike. The ammamaria is daisylike. The ammamaria button the maurie. The ammamaria christen the merrill. The micki is not daisylike. The micki is tzarist. The micki plasticize the ammamaria. The micki christen the ammamaria. The maurie is seventeen. The maurie plasticize the ammamaria. If someone christen the maurie and the maurie is not laic then they like the merrill. If the maurie christen the merrill and the maurie is seventeen then the merrill is tzarist. If someone is tzarist then they do not like the maurie. If the maurie is seventeen then the maurie christen the merrill. If someone button the maurie then they do not see the merrill. If someone plasticize the maurie then the maurie plasticize the merrill. The maurie does not visit the merrill.", "logic": "\nnot Daisylike(merrill)\nDaisylike(ammamaria)\nButton(ammamaria, maurie)\nChristen(ammamaria, merrill)\nnot Daisylike(micki)\nTzarist(micki)\nPlasticize(micki, ammamaria)\nChristen(micki, ammamaria)\nSeventeen(maurie)\nPlasticize(maurie, ammamaria)\nforall x (Christen(x, maurie) and not Laic(maurie) -> Button(x, merrill))\nChristen(maurie, merrill) and Seventeen(maurie) -> Tzarist(merrill)\nforall x (Tzarist(x) -> not Button(x, maurie))\nSeventeen(maurie) -> Christen(maurie, merrill)\nforall x (Button(x, maurie) -> not Plasticize(x, merrill))\nforall x (Plasticize(x, maurie) -> Plasticize(maurie, merrill))\n\nnot Christen(maurie, merrill)\n\nSeventeen(maurie) and Seventeen(maurie) -> Christen(maurie, merrill) -> therefore Christen(maurie, merrill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The karla is not regional. The kristan is regional. The kristan club the jeannie. The kristan becalm the karla. The julietta is not regional. The julietta is antipodean. The julietta vitalise the kristan. The julietta becalm the kristan. The jeannie is sluttish. The jeannie vitalise the kristan. If someone becalm the jeannie and the jeannie is not crenulated then they like the karla. If the jeannie becalm the karla and the jeannie is sluttish then the karla is antipodean. If someone is antipodean then they do not like the jeannie. If the jeannie is sluttish then the jeannie becalm the karla. If someone club the jeannie then they do not see the karla. If someone vitalise the jeannie then the jeannie vitalise the karla. The karla is antipodean.", "logic": "\nnot Regional(karla)\nRegional(kristan)\nClub(kristan, jeannie)\nBecalm(kristan, karla)\nnot Regional(julietta)\nAntipodean(julietta)\nVitalise(julietta, kristan)\nBecalm(julietta, kristan)\nSluttish(jeannie)\nVitalise(jeannie, kristan)\nforall x (Becalm(x, jeannie) and not Crenulated(jeannie) -> Club(x, karla))\nBecalm(jeannie, karla) and Sluttish(jeannie) -> Antipodean(karla)\nforall x (Antipodean(x) -> not Club(x, jeannie))\nSluttish(jeannie) -> Becalm(jeannie, karla)\nforall x (Club(x, jeannie) -> not Vitalise(x, karla))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, jeannie) -> Vitalise(jeannie, karla))\n\nAntipodean(karla)\n\nSluttish(jeannie) and Sluttish(jeannie) -> Becalm(jeannie, karla) -> therefore Becalm(jeannie, karla) Becalm(jeannie, karla) and Sluttish(jeannie) and Becalm(jeannie, karla) and Sluttish(jeannie) -> Antipodean(karla) -> therefore Antipodean(karla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The bonni is not unfilmed. The annabell is unfilmed. The annabell garment the stew. The annabell disconcert the bonni. The brigitta is not unfilmed. The brigitta is disturbed. The brigitta mount the annabell. The brigitta disconcert the annabell. The stew is bacchic. The stew mount the annabell. If someone disconcert the stew and the stew is not feathered then they like the bonni. If the stew disconcert the bonni and the stew is bacchic then the bonni is disturbed. If someone is disturbed then they do not like the stew. If the stew is bacchic then the stew disconcert the bonni. If someone garment the stew then they do not see the bonni. If someone mount the stew then the stew mount the bonni. The bonni is not disturbed.", "logic": "\nnot Unfilmed(bonni)\nUnfilmed(annabell)\nGarment(annabell, stew)\nDisconcert(annabell, bonni)\nnot Unfilmed(brigitta)\nDisturbed(brigitta)\nMount(brigitta, annabell)\nDisconcert(brigitta, annabell)\nBacchic(stew)\nMount(stew, annabell)\nforall x (Disconcert(x, stew) and not Feathered(stew) -> Garment(x, bonni))\nDisconcert(stew, bonni) and Bacchic(stew) -> Disturbed(bonni)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> not Garment(x, stew))\nBacchic(stew) -> Disconcert(stew, bonni)\nforall x (Garment(x, stew) -> not Mount(x, bonni))\nforall x (Mount(x, stew) -> Mount(stew, bonni))\n\nnot Disturbed(bonni)\n\nBacchic(stew) and Bacchic(stew) -> Disconcert(stew, bonni) -> therefore Disconcert(stew, bonni) Disconcert(stew, bonni) and Bacchic(stew) and Disconcert(stew, bonni) and Bacchic(stew) -> Disturbed(bonni) -> therefore Disturbed(bonni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The natassia is not calced. The ignazio is calced. The ignazio mishandle the nicki. The ignazio true the natassia. The marietta is not calced. The marietta is unmanly. The marietta jinx the ignazio. The marietta true the ignazio. The nicki is belated. The nicki jinx the ignazio. If someone true the nicki and the nicki is not obnoxious then they like the natassia. If the nicki true the natassia and the nicki is belated then the natassia is unmanly. If someone is unmanly then they do not like the nicki. If the nicki is belated then the nicki true the natassia. If someone mishandle the nicki then they do not see the natassia. If someone jinx the nicki then the nicki jinx the natassia. The natassia does not like the nicki.", "logic": "\nnot Calced(natassia)\nCalced(ignazio)\nMishandle(ignazio, nicki)\nTrue(ignazio, natassia)\nnot Calced(marietta)\nUnmanly(marietta)\nJinx(marietta, ignazio)\nTrue(marietta, ignazio)\nBelated(nicki)\nJinx(nicki, ignazio)\nforall x (True(x, nicki) and not Obnoxious(nicki) -> Mishandle(x, natassia))\nTrue(nicki, natassia) and Belated(nicki) -> Unmanly(natassia)\nforall x (Unmanly(x) -> not Mishandle(x, nicki))\nBelated(nicki) -> True(nicki, natassia)\nforall x (Mishandle(x, nicki) -> not Jinx(x, natassia))\nforall x (Jinx(x, nicki) -> Jinx(nicki, natassia))\n\nnot Mishandle(natassia, nicki)\n\nBelated(nicki) and Belated(nicki) -> True(nicki, natassia) -> therefore True(nicki, natassia) True(nicki, natassia) and Belated(nicki) and True(nicki, natassia) and Belated(nicki) -> Unmanly(natassia) -> therefore Unmanly(natassia) Unmanly(natassia) and forall x (Unmanly(x) -> not Mishandle(x, nicki)) -> therefore not Mishandle(natassia, nicki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The stormy is not theban. The ursuline is theban. The ursuline gnash the crawford. The ursuline censure the stormy. The poul is not theban. The poul is lipless. The poul fool the ursuline. The poul censure the ursuline. The crawford is monitory. The crawford fool the ursuline. If someone censure the crawford and the crawford is not primeval then they like the stormy. If the crawford censure the stormy and the crawford is monitory then the stormy is lipless. If someone is lipless then they do not like the crawford. If the crawford is monitory then the crawford censure the stormy. If someone gnash the crawford then they do not see the stormy. If someone fool the crawford then the crawford fool the stormy. The stormy gnash the crawford.", "logic": "\nnot Theban(stormy)\nTheban(ursuline)\nGnash(ursuline, crawford)\nCensure(ursuline, stormy)\nnot Theban(poul)\nLipless(poul)\nFool(poul, ursuline)\nCensure(poul, ursuline)\nMonitory(crawford)\nFool(crawford, ursuline)\nforall x (Censure(x, crawford) and not Primeval(crawford) -> Gnash(x, stormy))\nCensure(crawford, stormy) and Monitory(crawford) -> Lipless(stormy)\nforall x (Lipless(x) -> not Gnash(x, crawford))\nMonitory(crawford) -> Censure(crawford, stormy)\nforall x (Gnash(x, crawford) -> not Fool(x, stormy))\nforall x (Fool(x, crawford) -> Fool(crawford, stormy))\n\nGnash(stormy, crawford)\n\nMonitory(crawford) and Monitory(crawford) -> Censure(crawford, stormy) -> therefore Censure(crawford, stormy) Censure(crawford, stormy) and Monitory(crawford) and Censure(crawford, stormy) and Monitory(crawford) -> Lipless(stormy) -> therefore Lipless(stormy) Lipless(stormy) and forall x (Lipless(x) -> not Gnash(x, crawford)) -> therefore not Gnash(stormy, crawford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The briteny is not sweltry. The bobbi is sweltry. The bobbi unnerve the ingaberg. The bobbi pedal the briteny. The anurag is not sweltry. The anurag is microbic. The anurag ionate the bobbi. The anurag pedal the bobbi. The ingaberg is premier. The ingaberg ionate the bobbi. If someone pedal the ingaberg and the ingaberg is not unrentable then they like the briteny. If the ingaberg pedal the briteny and the ingaberg is premier then the briteny is microbic. If someone is microbic then they do not like the ingaberg. If the ingaberg is premier then the ingaberg pedal the briteny. If someone unnerve the ingaberg then they do not see the briteny. If someone ionate the ingaberg then the ingaberg ionate the briteny. The bobbi does not like the briteny.", "logic": "\nnot Sweltry(briteny)\nSweltry(bobbi)\nUnnerve(bobbi, ingaberg)\nPedal(bobbi, briteny)\nnot Sweltry(anurag)\nMicrobic(anurag)\nIonate(anurag, bobbi)\nPedal(anurag, bobbi)\nPremier(ingaberg)\nIonate(ingaberg, bobbi)\nforall x (Pedal(x, ingaberg) and not Unrentable(ingaberg) -> Unnerve(x, briteny))\nPedal(ingaberg, briteny) and Premier(ingaberg) -> Microbic(briteny)\nforall x (Microbic(x) -> not Unnerve(x, ingaberg))\nPremier(ingaberg) -> Pedal(ingaberg, briteny)\nforall x (Unnerve(x, ingaberg) -> not Ionate(x, briteny))\nforall x (Ionate(x, ingaberg) -> Ionate(ingaberg, briteny))\n\nnot Unnerve(bobbi, briteny)\n\nforall x (Pedal(x, ingaberg) and not Unrentable(ingaberg) -> Unnerve(x, briteny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The alan is not jocular. The leda is jocular. The leda overuse the agace. The leda stub the alan. The mead is not jocular. The mead is east. The mead jibe the leda. The mead stub the leda. The agace is forgetful. The agace jibe the leda. If someone stub the agace and the agace is not bedewed then they like the alan. If the agace stub the alan and the agace is forgetful then the alan is east. If someone is east then they do not like the agace. If the agace is forgetful then the agace stub the alan. If someone overuse the agace then they do not see the alan. If someone jibe the agace then the agace jibe the alan. The alan overuse the alan.", "logic": "\nnot Jocular(alan)\nJocular(leda)\nOveruse(leda, agace)\nStub(leda, alan)\nnot Jocular(mead)\nEast(mead)\nJibe(mead, leda)\nStub(mead, leda)\nForgetful(agace)\nJibe(agace, leda)\nforall x (Stub(x, agace) and not Bedewed(agace) -> Overuse(x, alan))\nStub(agace, alan) and Forgetful(agace) -> East(alan)\nforall x (East(x) -> not Overuse(x, agace))\nForgetful(agace) -> Stub(agace, alan)\nforall x (Overuse(x, agace) -> not Jibe(x, alan))\nforall x (Jibe(x, agace) -> Jibe(agace, alan))\n\nOveruse(alan, alan)\n\nforall x (Stub(x, agace) and not Bedewed(agace) -> Overuse(x, alan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The ervin is not graduated. The lorain is graduated. The lorain congregate the gwyn. The lorain stable the ervin. The colbert is not graduated. The colbert is mingy. The colbert undress the lorain. The colbert stable the lorain. The gwyn is downy. The gwyn undress the lorain. If someone stable the gwyn and the gwyn is not vaporous then they like the ervin. If the gwyn stable the ervin and the gwyn is downy then the ervin is mingy. If someone is mingy then they do not like the gwyn. If the gwyn is downy then the gwyn stable the ervin. If someone congregate the gwyn then they do not see the ervin. If someone undress the gwyn then the gwyn undress the ervin. The gwyn does not like the ervin.", "logic": "\nnot Graduated(ervin)\nGraduated(lorain)\nCongregate(lorain, gwyn)\nStable(lorain, ervin)\nnot Graduated(colbert)\nMingy(colbert)\nUndress(colbert, lorain)\nStable(colbert, lorain)\nDowny(gwyn)\nUndress(gwyn, lorain)\nforall x (Stable(x, gwyn) and not Vaporous(gwyn) -> Congregate(x, ervin))\nStable(gwyn, ervin) and Downy(gwyn) -> Mingy(ervin)\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> not Congregate(x, gwyn))\nDowny(gwyn) -> Stable(gwyn, ervin)\nforall x (Congregate(x, gwyn) -> not Undress(x, ervin))\nforall x (Undress(x, gwyn) -> Undress(gwyn, ervin))\n\nnot Congregate(gwyn, ervin)\n\nforall x (Stable(x, gwyn) and not Vaporous(gwyn) -> Congregate(x, ervin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The ellissa is not freehanded. The rosalie is freehanded. The rosalie salivate the lind. The rosalie notch the ellissa. The samantha is not freehanded. The samantha is viii. The samantha evaporate the rosalie. The samantha notch the rosalie. The lind is passionate. The lind evaporate the rosalie. If someone notch the lind and the lind is not adjective then they like the ellissa. If the lind notch the ellissa and the lind is passionate then the ellissa is viii. If someone is viii then they do not like the lind. If the lind is passionate then the lind notch the ellissa. If someone salivate the lind then they do not see the ellissa. If someone evaporate the lind then the lind evaporate the ellissa. The lind evaporate the ellissa.", "logic": "\nnot Freehanded(ellissa)\nFreehanded(rosalie)\nSalivate(rosalie, lind)\nNotch(rosalie, ellissa)\nnot Freehanded(samantha)\nViii(samantha)\nEvaporate(samantha, rosalie)\nNotch(samantha, rosalie)\nPassionate(lind)\nEvaporate(lind, rosalie)\nforall x (Notch(x, lind) and not Adjective(lind) -> Salivate(x, ellissa))\nNotch(lind, ellissa) and Passionate(lind) -> Viii(ellissa)\nforall x (Viii(x) -> not Salivate(x, lind))\nPassionate(lind) -> Notch(lind, ellissa)\nforall x (Salivate(x, lind) -> not Evaporate(x, ellissa))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, lind) -> Evaporate(lind, ellissa))\n\nEvaporate(lind, ellissa)\n\nforall x (Evaporate(x, lind) -> Evaporate(lind, ellissa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The valentia is not azygos. The niki is azygos. The niki candy the valentin. The niki bemuse the valentia. The milli is not azygos. The milli is soaked. The milli scollop the niki. The milli bemuse the niki. The valentin is homoecious. The valentin scollop the niki. If someone bemuse the valentin and the valentin is not unstilted then they like the valentia. If the valentin bemuse the valentia and the valentin is homoecious then the valentia is soaked. If someone is soaked then they do not like the valentin. If the valentin is homoecious then the valentin bemuse the valentia. If someone candy the valentin then they do not see the valentia. If someone scollop the valentin then the valentin scollop the valentia. The niki does not like the milli.", "logic": "\nnot Azygos(valentia)\nAzygos(niki)\nCandy(niki, valentin)\nBemuse(niki, valentia)\nnot Azygos(milli)\nSoaked(milli)\nScollop(milli, niki)\nBemuse(milli, niki)\nHomoecious(valentin)\nScollop(valentin, niki)\nforall x (Bemuse(x, valentin) and not Unstilted(valentin) -> Candy(x, valentia))\nBemuse(valentin, valentia) and Homoecious(valentin) -> Soaked(valentia)\nforall x (Soaked(x) -> not Candy(x, valentin))\nHomoecious(valentin) -> Bemuse(valentin, valentia)\nforall x (Candy(x, valentin) -> not Scollop(x, valentia))\nforall x (Scollop(x, valentin) -> Scollop(valentin, valentia))\n\nnot Candy(niki, milli)\n\nnot Candy(niki, milli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The lex is not godless. The fedora is godless. The fedora bombproof the olga. The fedora swell the lex. The welbie is not godless. The welbie is wrathful. The welbie lounge the fedora. The welbie swell the fedora. The olga is passant. The olga lounge the fedora. If someone swell the olga and the olga is not motivating then they like the lex. If the olga swell the lex and the olga is passant then the lex is wrathful. If someone is wrathful then they do not like the olga. If the olga is passant then the olga swell the lex. If someone bombproof the olga then they do not see the lex. If someone lounge the olga then the olga lounge the lex. The olga lounge the welbie.", "logic": "\nnot Godless(lex)\nGodless(fedora)\nBombproof(fedora, olga)\nSwell(fedora, lex)\nnot Godless(welbie)\nWrathful(welbie)\nLounge(welbie, fedora)\nSwell(welbie, fedora)\nPassant(olga)\nLounge(olga, fedora)\nforall x (Swell(x, olga) and not Motivating(olga) -> Bombproof(x, lex))\nSwell(olga, lex) and Passant(olga) -> Wrathful(lex)\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> not Bombproof(x, olga))\nPassant(olga) -> Swell(olga, lex)\nforall x (Bombproof(x, olga) -> not Lounge(x, lex))\nforall x (Lounge(x, olga) -> Lounge(olga, lex))\n\nLounge(olga, welbie)\n\nLounge(olga, welbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The kristine is not furtive. The kippie is furtive. The kippie jest the grove. The kippie ensnare the kristine. The dinny is not furtive. The dinny is promotive. The dinny snivel the kippie. The dinny ensnare the kippie. The grove is thinned. The grove snivel the kippie. If someone ensnare the grove and the grove is not overjoyed then they like the kristine. If the grove ensnare the kristine and the grove is thinned then the kristine is promotive. If someone is promotive then they do not like the grove. If the grove is thinned then the grove ensnare the kristine. If someone jest the grove then they do not see the kristine. If someone snivel the grove then the grove snivel the kristine. The kippie does not like the kippie.", "logic": "\nnot Furtive(kristine)\nFurtive(kippie)\nJest(kippie, grove)\nEnsnare(kippie, kristine)\nnot Furtive(dinny)\nPromotive(dinny)\nSnivel(dinny, kippie)\nEnsnare(dinny, kippie)\nThinned(grove)\nSnivel(grove, kippie)\nforall x (Ensnare(x, grove) and not Overjoyed(grove) -> Jest(x, kristine))\nEnsnare(grove, kristine) and Thinned(grove) -> Promotive(kristine)\nforall x (Promotive(x) -> not Jest(x, grove))\nThinned(grove) -> Ensnare(grove, kristine)\nforall x (Jest(x, grove) -> not Snivel(x, kristine))\nforall x (Snivel(x, grove) -> Snivel(grove, kristine))\n\nnot Jest(kippie, kippie)\n\nnot Jest(kippie, kippie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The ulla is not prissy. The zilvia is prissy. The zilvia bonderise the averell. The zilvia gush the ulla. The dasie is not prissy. The dasie is foreign. The dasie tend the zilvia. The dasie gush the zilvia. The averell is aerophilic. The averell tend the zilvia. If someone gush the averell and the averell is not bantering then they like the ulla. If the averell gush the ulla and the averell is aerophilic then the ulla is foreign. If someone is foreign then they do not like the averell. If the averell is aerophilic then the averell gush the ulla. If someone bonderise the averell then they do not see the ulla. If someone tend the averell then the averell tend the ulla. The zilvia gush the dasie.", "logic": "\nnot Prissy(ulla)\nPrissy(zilvia)\nBonderise(zilvia, averell)\nGush(zilvia, ulla)\nnot Prissy(dasie)\nForeign(dasie)\nTend(dasie, zilvia)\nGush(dasie, zilvia)\nAerophilic(averell)\nTend(averell, zilvia)\nforall x (Gush(x, averell) and not Bantering(averell) -> Bonderise(x, ulla))\nGush(averell, ulla) and Aerophilic(averell) -> Foreign(ulla)\nforall x (Foreign(x) -> not Bonderise(x, averell))\nAerophilic(averell) -> Gush(averell, ulla)\nforall x (Bonderise(x, averell) -> not Tend(x, ulla))\nforall x (Tend(x, averell) -> Tend(averell, ulla))\n\nGush(zilvia, dasie)\n\nGush(zilvia, dasie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The samantha is ruthful. The samantha bespeckle the andros. The andros calumniate the samantha. The andros calumniate the laurice. The andros does not visit the samantha. The laurice is formulary. The laurice calumniate the aubree. The laurice bespeckle the samantha. The laurice bespeckle the andros. The laurice bespeckle the aubree. The aubree is huxleyan. The aubree amass the samantha. The aubree does not need the laurice. The aubree does not see the samantha. The aubree calumniate the laurice. The aubree bespeckle the samantha. If something bespeckle the aubree then it calumniate the samantha. If the aubree bespeckle the samantha and the samantha bespeckle the andros then the samantha amass the andros. If the laurice is formulary and the laurice is huxleian then the laurice does not see the samantha. If something bespeckle the samantha and it calumniate the samantha then the samantha bespeckle the aubree. If something is twilit and it calumniate the aubree then it is huxleyan. If something is twilit then it bespeckle the laurice. If something calumniate the samantha and it bespeckle the andros then the andros is not huxleyan. If the andros calumniate the samantha then the andros does not visit the samantha. The andros calumniate the samantha.", "logic": "\nRuthful(samantha)\nBespeckle(samantha, andros)\nCalumniate(andros, samantha)\nCalumniate(andros, laurice)\nnot Bespeckle(andros, samantha)\nFormulary(laurice)\nCalumniate(laurice, aubree)\nBespeckle(laurice, samantha)\nBespeckle(laurice, andros)\nBespeckle(laurice, aubree)\nHuxleyan(aubree)\nAmass(aubree, samantha)\nnot Amass(aubree, laurice)\nnot Calumniate(aubree, samantha)\nCalumniate(aubree, laurice)\nBespeckle(aubree, samantha)\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, aubree) -> Calumniate(x, samantha))\nBespeckle(aubree, samantha) and Bespeckle(samantha, andros) -> Amass(samantha, andros)\nFormulary(laurice) and Huxleian(laurice) -> not Calumniate(laurice, samantha)\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, samantha) and Calumniate(x, samantha) -> Bespeckle(samantha, aubree))\nforall x (Twilit(x) and Calumniate(x, aubree) -> Huxleyan(x))\nforall x (Twilit(x) -> Bespeckle(x, laurice))\nforall x (Calumniate(x, samantha) and Bespeckle(x, andros) -> not Huxleyan(andros))\nCalumniate(andros, samantha) -> not Bespeckle(andros, samantha)\n\nCalumniate(andros, samantha)\n\ntherefore Calumniate(andros, samantha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The humphrey is meteoritic. The humphrey persevere the gustave. The gustave produce the humphrey. The gustave produce the jermain. The gustave does not visit the humphrey. The jermain is struggling. The jermain produce the bonita. The jermain persevere the humphrey. The jermain persevere the gustave. The jermain persevere the bonita. The bonita is unlatched. The bonita reprobate the humphrey. The bonita does not need the jermain. The bonita does not see the humphrey. The bonita produce the jermain. The bonita persevere the humphrey. If something persevere the bonita then it produce the humphrey. If the bonita persevere the humphrey and the humphrey persevere the gustave then the humphrey reprobate the gustave. If the jermain is struggling and the jermain is vehicular then the jermain does not see the humphrey. If something persevere the humphrey and it produce the humphrey then the humphrey persevere the bonita. If something is lacteal and it produce the bonita then it is unlatched. If something is lacteal then it persevere the jermain. If something produce the humphrey and it persevere the gustave then the gustave is not unlatched. If the gustave produce the humphrey then the gustave does not visit the humphrey. The bonita does not need the humphrey.", "logic": "\nMeteoritic(humphrey)\nPersevere(humphrey, gustave)\nProduce(gustave, humphrey)\nProduce(gustave, jermain)\nnot Persevere(gustave, humphrey)\nStruggling(jermain)\nProduce(jermain, bonita)\nPersevere(jermain, humphrey)\nPersevere(jermain, gustave)\nPersevere(jermain, bonita)\nUnlatched(bonita)\nReprobate(bonita, humphrey)\nnot Reprobate(bonita, jermain)\nnot Produce(bonita, humphrey)\nProduce(bonita, jermain)\nPersevere(bonita, humphrey)\nforall x (Persevere(x, bonita) -> Produce(x, humphrey))\nPersevere(bonita, humphrey) and Persevere(humphrey, gustave) -> Reprobate(humphrey, gustave)\nStruggling(jermain) and Vehicular(jermain) -> not Produce(jermain, humphrey)\nforall x (Persevere(x, humphrey) and Produce(x, humphrey) -> Persevere(humphrey, bonita))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Produce(x, bonita) -> Unlatched(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) -> Persevere(x, jermain))\nforall x (Produce(x, humphrey) and Persevere(x, gustave) -> not Unlatched(gustave))\nProduce(gustave, humphrey) -> not Persevere(gustave, humphrey)\n\nnot Reprobate(bonita, humphrey)\n\ntherefore Reprobate(bonita, humphrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The cybill is peppy. The cybill assent the libbi. The libbi despatch the cybill. The libbi despatch the kaitlin. The libbi does not visit the cybill. The kaitlin is unawed. The kaitlin despatch the wylma. The kaitlin assent the cybill. The kaitlin assent the libbi. The kaitlin assent the wylma. The wylma is fruitful. The wylma bowdlerize the cybill. The wylma does not need the kaitlin. The wylma does not see the cybill. The wylma despatch the kaitlin. The wylma assent the cybill. If something assent the wylma then it despatch the cybill. If the wylma assent the cybill and the cybill assent the libbi then the cybill bowdlerize the libbi. If the kaitlin is unawed and the kaitlin is leisured then the kaitlin does not see the cybill. If something assent the cybill and it despatch the cybill then the cybill assent the wylma. If something is projected and it despatch the wylma then it is fruitful. If something is projected then it assent the kaitlin. If something despatch the cybill and it assent the libbi then the libbi is not fruitful. If the libbi despatch the cybill then the libbi does not visit the cybill. The kaitlin despatch the cybill.", "logic": "\nPeppy(cybill)\nAssent(cybill, libbi)\nDespatch(libbi, cybill)\nDespatch(libbi, kaitlin)\nnot Assent(libbi, cybill)\nUnawed(kaitlin)\nDespatch(kaitlin, wylma)\nAssent(kaitlin, cybill)\nAssent(kaitlin, libbi)\nAssent(kaitlin, wylma)\nFruitful(wylma)\nBowdlerize(wylma, cybill)\nnot Bowdlerize(wylma, kaitlin)\nnot Despatch(wylma, cybill)\nDespatch(wylma, kaitlin)\nAssent(wylma, cybill)\nforall x (Assent(x, wylma) -> Despatch(x, cybill))\nAssent(wylma, cybill) and Assent(cybill, libbi) -> Bowdlerize(cybill, libbi)\nUnawed(kaitlin) and Leisured(kaitlin) -> not Despatch(kaitlin, cybill)\nforall x (Assent(x, cybill) and Despatch(x, cybill) -> Assent(cybill, wylma))\nforall x (Projected(x) and Despatch(x, wylma) -> Fruitful(x))\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Assent(x, kaitlin))\nforall x (Despatch(x, cybill) and Assent(x, libbi) -> not Fruitful(libbi))\nDespatch(libbi, cybill) -> not Assent(libbi, cybill)\n\nDespatch(kaitlin, cybill)\n\nAssent(kaitlin, wylma) and forall x (Assent(x, wylma) -> Despatch(x, cybill)) -> therefore Despatch(kaitlin, cybill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The carmelina is curly. The carmelina transfer the loreen. The loreen ante the carmelina. The loreen ante the gert. The loreen does not visit the carmelina. The gert is dwindling. The gert ante the otes. The gert transfer the carmelina. The gert transfer the loreen. The gert transfer the otes. The otes is extensile. The otes naturalize the carmelina. The otes does not need the gert. The otes does not see the carmelina. The otes ante the gert. The otes transfer the carmelina. If something transfer the otes then it ante the carmelina. If the otes transfer the carmelina and the carmelina transfer the loreen then the carmelina naturalize the loreen. If the gert is dwindling and the gert is odourless then the gert does not see the carmelina. If something transfer the carmelina and it ante the carmelina then the carmelina transfer the otes. If something is olympic and it ante the otes then it is extensile. If something is olympic then it transfer the gert. If something ante the carmelina and it transfer the loreen then the loreen is not extensile. If the loreen ante the carmelina then the loreen does not visit the carmelina. The gert does not see the carmelina.", "logic": "\nCurly(carmelina)\nTransfer(carmelina, loreen)\nAnte(loreen, carmelina)\nAnte(loreen, gert)\nnot Transfer(loreen, carmelina)\nDwindling(gert)\nAnte(gert, otes)\nTransfer(gert, carmelina)\nTransfer(gert, loreen)\nTransfer(gert, otes)\nExtensile(otes)\nNaturalize(otes, carmelina)\nnot Naturalize(otes, gert)\nnot Ante(otes, carmelina)\nAnte(otes, gert)\nTransfer(otes, carmelina)\nforall x (Transfer(x, otes) -> Ante(x, carmelina))\nTransfer(otes, carmelina) and Transfer(carmelina, loreen) -> Naturalize(carmelina, loreen)\nDwindling(gert) and Odourless(gert) -> not Ante(gert, carmelina)\nforall x (Transfer(x, carmelina) and Ante(x, carmelina) -> Transfer(carmelina, otes))\nforall x (Olympic(x) and Ante(x, otes) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Olympic(x) -> Transfer(x, gert))\nforall x (Ante(x, carmelina) and Transfer(x, loreen) -> not Extensile(loreen))\nAnte(loreen, carmelina) -> not Transfer(loreen, carmelina)\n\nnot Ante(gert, carmelina)\n\nTransfer(gert, otes) and forall x (Transfer(x, otes) -> Ante(x, carmelina)) -> therefore Ante(gert, carmelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The marline is cragfast. The marline proctor the ottilie. The ottilie select the marline. The ottilie select the marshal. The ottilie does not visit the marline. The marshal is deciding. The marshal select the hans. The marshal proctor the marline. The marshal proctor the ottilie. The marshal proctor the hans. The hans is nonhuman. The hans clinker the marline. The hans does not need the marshal. The hans does not see the marline. The hans select the marshal. The hans proctor the marline. If something proctor the hans then it select the marline. If the hans proctor the marline and the marline proctor the ottilie then the marline clinker the ottilie. If the marshal is deciding and the marshal is consenting then the marshal does not see the marline. If something proctor the marline and it select the marline then the marline proctor the hans. If something is fixed and it select the hans then it is nonhuman. If something is fixed then it proctor the marshal. If something select the marline and it proctor the ottilie then the ottilie is not nonhuman. If the ottilie select the marline then the ottilie does not visit the marline. The ottilie is not nonhuman.", "logic": "\nCragfast(marline)\nProctor(marline, ottilie)\nSelect(ottilie, marline)\nSelect(ottilie, marshal)\nnot Proctor(ottilie, marline)\nDeciding(marshal)\nSelect(marshal, hans)\nProctor(marshal, marline)\nProctor(marshal, ottilie)\nProctor(marshal, hans)\nNonhuman(hans)\nClinker(hans, marline)\nnot Clinker(hans, marshal)\nnot Select(hans, marline)\nSelect(hans, marshal)\nProctor(hans, marline)\nforall x (Proctor(x, hans) -> Select(x, marline))\nProctor(hans, marline) and Proctor(marline, ottilie) -> Clinker(marline, ottilie)\nDeciding(marshal) and Consenting(marshal) -> not Select(marshal, marline)\nforall x (Proctor(x, marline) and Select(x, marline) -> Proctor(marline, hans))\nforall x (Fixed(x) and Select(x, hans) -> Nonhuman(x))\nforall x (Fixed(x) -> Proctor(x, marshal))\nforall x (Select(x, marline) and Proctor(x, ottilie) -> not Nonhuman(ottilie))\nSelect(ottilie, marline) -> not Proctor(ottilie, marline)\n\nnot Nonhuman(ottilie)\n\nProctor(marshal, hans) and forall x (Proctor(x, hans) -> Select(x, marline)) -> therefore Select(marshal, marline) Select(marshal, marline) and Proctor(marshal, ottilie) and forall x (Select(x, marline) and Proctor(x, ottilie) -> not Nonhuman(ottilie)) -> therefore not Nonhuman(ottilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The cori is zoonotic. The cori stigmatise the lauryn. The lauryn cense the cori. The lauryn cense the modestia. The lauryn does not visit the cori. The modestia is homonymous. The modestia cense the daryle. The modestia stigmatise the cori. The modestia stigmatise the lauryn. The modestia stigmatise the daryle. The daryle is genoese. The daryle bethink the cori. The daryle does not need the modestia. The daryle does not see the cori. The daryle cense the modestia. The daryle stigmatise the cori. If something stigmatise the daryle then it cense the cori. If the daryle stigmatise the cori and the cori stigmatise the lauryn then the cori bethink the lauryn. If the modestia is homonymous and the modestia is satellite then the modestia does not see the cori. If something stigmatise the cori and it cense the cori then the cori stigmatise the daryle. If something is amuck and it cense the daryle then it is genoese. If something is amuck then it stigmatise the modestia. If something cense the cori and it stigmatise the lauryn then the lauryn is not genoese. If the lauryn cense the cori then the lauryn does not visit the cori. The cori does not visit the daryle.", "logic": "\nZoonotic(cori)\nStigmatise(cori, lauryn)\nCense(lauryn, cori)\nCense(lauryn, modestia)\nnot Stigmatise(lauryn, cori)\nHomonymous(modestia)\nCense(modestia, daryle)\nStigmatise(modestia, cori)\nStigmatise(modestia, lauryn)\nStigmatise(modestia, daryle)\nGenoese(daryle)\nBethink(daryle, cori)\nnot Bethink(daryle, modestia)\nnot Cense(daryle, cori)\nCense(daryle, modestia)\nStigmatise(daryle, cori)\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, daryle) -> Cense(x, cori))\nStigmatise(daryle, cori) and Stigmatise(cori, lauryn) -> Bethink(cori, lauryn)\nHomonymous(modestia) and Satellite(modestia) -> not Cense(modestia, cori)\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, cori) and Cense(x, cori) -> Stigmatise(cori, daryle))\nforall x (Amuck(x) and Cense(x, daryle) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) -> Stigmatise(x, modestia))\nforall x (Cense(x, cori) and Stigmatise(x, lauryn) -> not Genoese(lauryn))\nCense(lauryn, cori) -> not Stigmatise(lauryn, cori)\n\nnot Stigmatise(cori, daryle)\n\nStigmatise(modestia, daryle) and forall x (Stigmatise(x, daryle) -> Cense(x, cori)) -> therefore Cense(modestia, cori) Stigmatise(modestia, cori) and Cense(modestia, cori) and forall x (Stigmatise(x, cori) and Cense(x, cori) -> Stigmatise(cori, daryle)) -> therefore Stigmatise(cori, daryle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The suzie is squalling. The suzie paganise the kit. The kit descend the suzie. The kit descend the ailey. The kit does not visit the suzie. The ailey is oaken. The ailey descend the venkat. The ailey paganise the suzie. The ailey paganise the kit. The ailey paganise the venkat. The venkat is stilted. The venkat feminize the suzie. The venkat does not need the ailey. The venkat does not see the suzie. The venkat descend the ailey. The venkat paganise the suzie. If something paganise the venkat then it descend the suzie. If the venkat paganise the suzie and the suzie paganise the kit then the suzie feminize the kit. If the ailey is oaken and the ailey is priapic then the ailey does not see the suzie. If something paganise the suzie and it descend the suzie then the suzie paganise the venkat. If something is accusive and it descend the venkat then it is stilted. If something is accusive then it paganise the ailey. If something descend the suzie and it paganise the kit then the kit is not stilted. If the kit descend the suzie then the kit does not visit the suzie. The suzie descend the suzie.", "logic": "\nSqualling(suzie)\nPaganise(suzie, kit)\nDescend(kit, suzie)\nDescend(kit, ailey)\nnot Paganise(kit, suzie)\nOaken(ailey)\nDescend(ailey, venkat)\nPaganise(ailey, suzie)\nPaganise(ailey, kit)\nPaganise(ailey, venkat)\nStilted(venkat)\nFeminize(venkat, suzie)\nnot Feminize(venkat, ailey)\nnot Descend(venkat, suzie)\nDescend(venkat, ailey)\nPaganise(venkat, suzie)\nforall x (Paganise(x, venkat) -> Descend(x, suzie))\nPaganise(venkat, suzie) and Paganise(suzie, kit) -> Feminize(suzie, kit)\nOaken(ailey) and Priapic(ailey) -> not Descend(ailey, suzie)\nforall x (Paganise(x, suzie) and Descend(x, suzie) -> Paganise(suzie, venkat))\nforall x (Accusive(x) and Descend(x, venkat) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Accusive(x) -> Paganise(x, ailey))\nforall x (Descend(x, suzie) and Paganise(x, kit) -> not Stilted(kit))\nDescend(kit, suzie) -> not Paganise(kit, suzie)\n\nDescend(suzie, suzie)\n\nPaganise(ailey, venkat) and forall x (Paganise(x, venkat) -> Descend(x, suzie)) -> therefore Descend(ailey, suzie) Paganise(ailey, suzie) and Descend(ailey, suzie) and forall x (Paganise(x, suzie) and Descend(x, suzie) -> Paganise(suzie, venkat)) -> therefore Paganise(suzie, venkat) Paganise(suzie, venkat) and forall x (Paganise(x, venkat) -> Descend(x, suzie)) -> therefore Descend(suzie, suzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The carlene is flaunty. The carlene engulf the boniface. The boniface bombinate the carlene. The boniface bombinate the sandye. The boniface does not visit the carlene. The sandye is imaginable. The sandye bombinate the marlane. The sandye engulf the carlene. The sandye engulf the boniface. The sandye engulf the marlane. The marlane is tumultuous. The marlane hook the carlene. The marlane does not need the sandye. The marlane does not see the carlene. The marlane bombinate the sandye. The marlane engulf the carlene. If something engulf the marlane then it bombinate the carlene. If the marlane engulf the carlene and the carlene engulf the boniface then the carlene hook the boniface. If the sandye is imaginable and the sandye is semiopaque then the sandye does not see the carlene. If something engulf the carlene and it bombinate the carlene then the carlene engulf the marlane. If something is grown and it bombinate the marlane then it is tumultuous. If something is grown then it engulf the sandye. If something bombinate the carlene and it engulf the boniface then the boniface is not tumultuous. If the boniface bombinate the carlene then the boniface does not visit the carlene. The carlene does not see the carlene.", "logic": "\nFlaunty(carlene)\nEngulf(carlene, boniface)\nBombinate(boniface, carlene)\nBombinate(boniface, sandye)\nnot Engulf(boniface, carlene)\nImaginable(sandye)\nBombinate(sandye, marlane)\nEngulf(sandye, carlene)\nEngulf(sandye, boniface)\nEngulf(sandye, marlane)\nTumultuous(marlane)\nHook(marlane, carlene)\nnot Hook(marlane, sandye)\nnot Bombinate(marlane, carlene)\nBombinate(marlane, sandye)\nEngulf(marlane, carlene)\nforall x (Engulf(x, marlane) -> Bombinate(x, carlene))\nEngulf(marlane, carlene) and Engulf(carlene, boniface) -> Hook(carlene, boniface)\nImaginable(sandye) and Semiopaque(sandye) -> not Bombinate(sandye, carlene)\nforall x (Engulf(x, carlene) and Bombinate(x, carlene) -> Engulf(carlene, marlane))\nforall x (Grown(x) and Bombinate(x, marlane) -> Tumultuous(x))\nforall x (Grown(x) -> Engulf(x, sandye))\nforall x (Bombinate(x, carlene) and Engulf(x, boniface) -> not Tumultuous(boniface))\nBombinate(boniface, carlene) -> not Engulf(boniface, carlene)\n\nnot Bombinate(carlene, carlene)\n\nEngulf(sandye, marlane) and forall x (Engulf(x, marlane) -> Bombinate(x, carlene)) -> therefore Bombinate(sandye, carlene) Engulf(sandye, carlene) and Bombinate(sandye, carlene) and forall x (Engulf(x, carlene) and Bombinate(x, carlene) -> Engulf(carlene, marlane)) -> therefore Engulf(carlene, marlane) Engulf(carlene, marlane) and forall x (Engulf(x, marlane) -> Bombinate(x, carlene)) -> therefore Bombinate(carlene, carlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The golda is parented. The golda bloom the sari. The sari crew the golda. The sari crew the octavia. The sari does not visit the golda. The octavia is attachable. The octavia crew the wilona. The octavia bloom the golda. The octavia bloom the sari. The octavia bloom the wilona. The wilona is paranoid. The wilona slenderize the golda. The wilona does not need the octavia. The wilona does not see the golda. The wilona crew the octavia. The wilona bloom the golda. If something bloom the wilona then it crew the golda. If the wilona bloom the golda and the golda bloom the sari then the golda slenderize the sari. If the octavia is attachable and the octavia is dazzled then the octavia does not see the golda. If something bloom the golda and it crew the golda then the golda bloom the wilona. If something is anapestic and it crew the wilona then it is paranoid. If something is anapestic then it bloom the octavia. If something crew the golda and it bloom the sari then the sari is not paranoid. If the sari crew the golda then the sari does not visit the golda. The sari does not visit the octavia.", "logic": "\nParented(golda)\nBloom(golda, sari)\nCrew(sari, golda)\nCrew(sari, octavia)\nnot Bloom(sari, golda)\nAttachable(octavia)\nCrew(octavia, wilona)\nBloom(octavia, golda)\nBloom(octavia, sari)\nBloom(octavia, wilona)\nParanoid(wilona)\nSlenderize(wilona, golda)\nnot Slenderize(wilona, octavia)\nnot Crew(wilona, golda)\nCrew(wilona, octavia)\nBloom(wilona, golda)\nforall x (Bloom(x, wilona) -> Crew(x, golda))\nBloom(wilona, golda) and Bloom(golda, sari) -> Slenderize(golda, sari)\nAttachable(octavia) and Dazzled(octavia) -> not Crew(octavia, golda)\nforall x (Bloom(x, golda) and Crew(x, golda) -> Bloom(golda, wilona))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) and Crew(x, wilona) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) -> Bloom(x, octavia))\nforall x (Crew(x, golda) and Bloom(x, sari) -> not Paranoid(sari))\nCrew(sari, golda) -> not Bloom(sari, golda)\n\nnot Bloom(sari, octavia)\n\nforall x (Anapestic(x) -> Bloom(x, octavia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The trenton is defeasible. The trenton diazotize the karlyn. The karlyn park the trenton. The karlyn park the ardeen. The karlyn does not visit the trenton. The ardeen is bedless. The ardeen park the jereme. The ardeen diazotize the trenton. The ardeen diazotize the karlyn. The ardeen diazotize the jereme. The jereme is retro. The jereme author the trenton. The jereme does not need the ardeen. The jereme does not see the trenton. The jereme park the ardeen. The jereme diazotize the trenton. If something diazotize the jereme then it park the trenton. If the jereme diazotize the trenton and the trenton diazotize the karlyn then the trenton author the karlyn. If the ardeen is bedless and the ardeen is salubrious then the ardeen does not see the trenton. If something diazotize the trenton and it park the trenton then the trenton diazotize the jereme. If something is carangid and it park the jereme then it is retro. If something is carangid then it diazotize the ardeen. If something park the trenton and it diazotize the karlyn then the karlyn is not retro. If the karlyn park the trenton then the karlyn does not visit the trenton. The ardeen is retro.", "logic": "\nDefeasible(trenton)\nDiazotize(trenton, karlyn)\nPark(karlyn, trenton)\nPark(karlyn, ardeen)\nnot Diazotize(karlyn, trenton)\nBedless(ardeen)\nPark(ardeen, jereme)\nDiazotize(ardeen, trenton)\nDiazotize(ardeen, karlyn)\nDiazotize(ardeen, jereme)\nRetro(jereme)\nAuthor(jereme, trenton)\nnot Author(jereme, ardeen)\nnot Park(jereme, trenton)\nPark(jereme, ardeen)\nDiazotize(jereme, trenton)\nforall x (Diazotize(x, jereme) -> Park(x, trenton))\nDiazotize(jereme, trenton) and Diazotize(trenton, karlyn) -> Author(trenton, karlyn)\nBedless(ardeen) and Salubrious(ardeen) -> not Park(ardeen, trenton)\nforall x (Diazotize(x, trenton) and Park(x, trenton) -> Diazotize(trenton, jereme))\nforall x (Carangid(x) and Park(x, jereme) -> Retro(x))\nforall x (Carangid(x) -> Diazotize(x, ardeen))\nforall x (Park(x, trenton) and Diazotize(x, karlyn) -> not Retro(karlyn))\nPark(karlyn, trenton) -> not Diazotize(karlyn, trenton)\n\nRetro(ardeen)\n\nforall x (Carangid(x) and Park(x, jereme) -> Retro(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The sancho is snappish. The sancho catenulate the etienne. The etienne relyric the sancho. The etienne relyric the garvin. The etienne does not visit the sancho. The garvin is benthic. The garvin relyric the kelcie. The garvin catenulate the sancho. The garvin catenulate the etienne. The garvin catenulate the kelcie. The kelcie is aneurysmal. The kelcie doom the sancho. The kelcie does not need the garvin. The kelcie does not see the sancho. The kelcie relyric the garvin. The kelcie catenulate the sancho. If something catenulate the kelcie then it relyric the sancho. If the kelcie catenulate the sancho and the sancho catenulate the etienne then the sancho doom the etienne. If the garvin is benthic and the garvin is daft then the garvin does not see the sancho. If something catenulate the sancho and it relyric the sancho then the sancho catenulate the kelcie. If something is unbeatable and it relyric the kelcie then it is aneurysmal. If something is unbeatable then it catenulate the garvin. If something relyric the sancho and it catenulate the etienne then the etienne is not aneurysmal. If the etienne relyric the sancho then the etienne does not visit the sancho. The sancho is not aneurysmal.", "logic": "\nSnappish(sancho)\nCatenulate(sancho, etienne)\nRelyric(etienne, sancho)\nRelyric(etienne, garvin)\nnot Catenulate(etienne, sancho)\nBenthic(garvin)\nRelyric(garvin, kelcie)\nCatenulate(garvin, sancho)\nCatenulate(garvin, etienne)\nCatenulate(garvin, kelcie)\nAneurysmal(kelcie)\nDoom(kelcie, sancho)\nnot Doom(kelcie, garvin)\nnot Relyric(kelcie, sancho)\nRelyric(kelcie, garvin)\nCatenulate(kelcie, sancho)\nforall x (Catenulate(x, kelcie) -> Relyric(x, sancho))\nCatenulate(kelcie, sancho) and Catenulate(sancho, etienne) -> Doom(sancho, etienne)\nBenthic(garvin) and Daft(garvin) -> not Relyric(garvin, sancho)\nforall x (Catenulate(x, sancho) and Relyric(x, sancho) -> Catenulate(sancho, kelcie))\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) and Relyric(x, kelcie) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) -> Catenulate(x, garvin))\nforall x (Relyric(x, sancho) and Catenulate(x, etienne) -> not Aneurysmal(etienne))\nRelyric(etienne, sancho) -> not Catenulate(etienne, sancho)\n\nnot Aneurysmal(sancho)\n\nforall x (Unbeatable(x) and Relyric(x, kelcie) -> Aneurysmal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The almeria is prefaded. The almeria lallygag the lisbeth. The lisbeth deface the almeria. The lisbeth deface the antonino. The lisbeth does not visit the almeria. The antonino is celluloid. The antonino deface the magnus. The antonino lallygag the almeria. The antonino lallygag the lisbeth. The antonino lallygag the magnus. The magnus is gradable. The magnus deodourise the almeria. The magnus does not need the antonino. The magnus does not see the almeria. The magnus deface the antonino. The magnus lallygag the almeria. If something lallygag the magnus then it deface the almeria. If the magnus lallygag the almeria and the almeria lallygag the lisbeth then the almeria deodourise the lisbeth. If the antonino is celluloid and the antonino is royal then the antonino does not see the almeria. If something lallygag the almeria and it deface the almeria then the almeria lallygag the magnus. If something is overproud and it deface the magnus then it is gradable. If something is overproud then it lallygag the antonino. If something deface the almeria and it lallygag the lisbeth then the lisbeth is not gradable. If the lisbeth deface the almeria then the lisbeth does not visit the almeria. The antonino lallygag the antonino.", "logic": "\nPrefaded(almeria)\nLallygag(almeria, lisbeth)\nDeface(lisbeth, almeria)\nDeface(lisbeth, antonino)\nnot Lallygag(lisbeth, almeria)\nCelluloid(antonino)\nDeface(antonino, magnus)\nLallygag(antonino, almeria)\nLallygag(antonino, lisbeth)\nLallygag(antonino, magnus)\nGradable(magnus)\nDeodourise(magnus, almeria)\nnot Deodourise(magnus, antonino)\nnot Deface(magnus, almeria)\nDeface(magnus, antonino)\nLallygag(magnus, almeria)\nforall x (Lallygag(x, magnus) -> Deface(x, almeria))\nLallygag(magnus, almeria) and Lallygag(almeria, lisbeth) -> Deodourise(almeria, lisbeth)\nCelluloid(antonino) and Royal(antonino) -> not Deface(antonino, almeria)\nforall x (Lallygag(x, almeria) and Deface(x, almeria) -> Lallygag(almeria, magnus))\nforall x (Overproud(x) and Deface(x, magnus) -> Gradable(x))\nforall x (Overproud(x) -> Lallygag(x, antonino))\nforall x (Deface(x, almeria) and Lallygag(x, lisbeth) -> not Gradable(lisbeth))\nDeface(lisbeth, almeria) -> not Lallygag(lisbeth, almeria)\n\nLallygag(antonino, antonino)\n\nforall x (Overproud(x) -> Lallygag(x, antonino)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The timi is benzoic. The timi true the ceciley. The ceciley reignite the timi. The ceciley reignite the standford. The ceciley does not visit the timi. The standford is mesenteric. The standford reignite the cassy. The standford true the timi. The standford true the ceciley. The standford true the cassy. The cassy is bespoken. The cassy spray the timi. The cassy does not need the standford. The cassy does not see the timi. The cassy reignite the standford. The cassy true the timi. If something true the cassy then it reignite the timi. If the cassy true the timi and the timi true the ceciley then the timi spray the ceciley. If the standford is mesenteric and the standford is calced then the standford does not see the timi. If something true the timi and it reignite the timi then the timi true the cassy. If something is shodden and it reignite the cassy then it is bespoken. If something is shodden then it true the standford. If something reignite the timi and it true the ceciley then the ceciley is not bespoken. If the ceciley reignite the timi then the ceciley does not visit the timi. The ceciley is not shodden.", "logic": "\nBenzoic(timi)\nTrue(timi, ceciley)\nReignite(ceciley, timi)\nReignite(ceciley, standford)\nnot True(ceciley, timi)\nMesenteric(standford)\nReignite(standford, cassy)\nTrue(standford, timi)\nTrue(standford, ceciley)\nTrue(standford, cassy)\nBespoken(cassy)\nSpray(cassy, timi)\nnot Spray(cassy, standford)\nnot Reignite(cassy, timi)\nReignite(cassy, standford)\nTrue(cassy, timi)\nforall x (True(x, cassy) -> Reignite(x, timi))\nTrue(cassy, timi) and True(timi, ceciley) -> Spray(timi, ceciley)\nMesenteric(standford) and Calced(standford) -> not Reignite(standford, timi)\nforall x (True(x, timi) and Reignite(x, timi) -> True(timi, cassy))\nforall x (Shodden(x) and Reignite(x, cassy) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Shodden(x) -> True(x, standford))\nforall x (Reignite(x, timi) and True(x, ceciley) -> not Bespoken(ceciley))\nReignite(ceciley, timi) -> not True(ceciley, timi)\n\nnot Shodden(ceciley)\n\nnot Shodden(ceciley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The aamir is bearish. The aamir solace the esau. The esau goofproof the aamir. The esau goofproof the dick. The esau does not visit the aamir. The dick is empty. The dick goofproof the florian. The dick solace the aamir. The dick solace the esau. The dick solace the florian. The florian is eventful. The florian tower the aamir. The florian does not need the dick. The florian does not see the aamir. The florian goofproof the dick. The florian solace the aamir. If something solace the florian then it goofproof the aamir. If the florian solace the aamir and the aamir solace the esau then the aamir tower the esau. If the dick is empty and the dick is tudor then the dick does not see the aamir. If something solace the aamir and it goofproof the aamir then the aamir solace the florian. If something is awned and it goofproof the florian then it is eventful. If something is awned then it solace the dick. If something goofproof the aamir and it solace the esau then the esau is not eventful. If the esau goofproof the aamir then the esau does not visit the aamir. The dick goofproof the esau.", "logic": "\nBearish(aamir)\nSolace(aamir, esau)\nGoofproof(esau, aamir)\nGoofproof(esau, dick)\nnot Solace(esau, aamir)\nEmpty(dick)\nGoofproof(dick, florian)\nSolace(dick, aamir)\nSolace(dick, esau)\nSolace(dick, florian)\nEventful(florian)\nTower(florian, aamir)\nnot Tower(florian, dick)\nnot Goofproof(florian, aamir)\nGoofproof(florian, dick)\nSolace(florian, aamir)\nforall x (Solace(x, florian) -> Goofproof(x, aamir))\nSolace(florian, aamir) and Solace(aamir, esau) -> Tower(aamir, esau)\nEmpty(dick) and Tudor(dick) -> not Goofproof(dick, aamir)\nforall x (Solace(x, aamir) and Goofproof(x, aamir) -> Solace(aamir, florian))\nforall x (Awned(x) and Goofproof(x, florian) -> Eventful(x))\nforall x (Awned(x) -> Solace(x, dick))\nforall x (Goofproof(x, aamir) and Solace(x, esau) -> not Eventful(esau))\nGoofproof(esau, aamir) -> not Solace(esau, aamir)\n\nGoofproof(dick, esau)\n\nGoofproof(dick, esau) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The raoul is arranged. The raoul subtitle the natassia. The natassia whale the raoul. The natassia whale the tabatha. The natassia does not visit the raoul. The tabatha is concurring. The tabatha whale the lucita. The tabatha subtitle the raoul. The tabatha subtitle the natassia. The tabatha subtitle the lucita. The lucita is satyrical. The lucita budget the raoul. The lucita does not need the tabatha. The lucita does not see the raoul. The lucita whale the tabatha. The lucita subtitle the raoul. If something subtitle the lucita then it whale the raoul. If the lucita subtitle the raoul and the raoul subtitle the natassia then the raoul budget the natassia. If the tabatha is concurring and the tabatha is feral then the tabatha does not see the raoul. If something subtitle the raoul and it whale the raoul then the raoul subtitle the lucita. If something is uncurving and it whale the lucita then it is satyrical. If something is uncurving then it subtitle the tabatha. If something whale the raoul and it subtitle the natassia then the natassia is not satyrical. If the natassia whale the raoul then the natassia does not visit the raoul. The raoul is not uncurving.", "logic": "\nArranged(raoul)\nSubtitle(raoul, natassia)\nWhale(natassia, raoul)\nWhale(natassia, tabatha)\nnot Subtitle(natassia, raoul)\nConcurring(tabatha)\nWhale(tabatha, lucita)\nSubtitle(tabatha, raoul)\nSubtitle(tabatha, natassia)\nSubtitle(tabatha, lucita)\nSatyrical(lucita)\nBudget(lucita, raoul)\nnot Budget(lucita, tabatha)\nnot Whale(lucita, raoul)\nWhale(lucita, tabatha)\nSubtitle(lucita, raoul)\nforall x (Subtitle(x, lucita) -> Whale(x, raoul))\nSubtitle(lucita, raoul) and Subtitle(raoul, natassia) -> Budget(raoul, natassia)\nConcurring(tabatha) and Feral(tabatha) -> not Whale(tabatha, raoul)\nforall x (Subtitle(x, raoul) and Whale(x, raoul) -> Subtitle(raoul, lucita))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) and Whale(x, lucita) -> Satyrical(x))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Subtitle(x, tabatha))\nforall x (Whale(x, raoul) and Subtitle(x, natassia) -> not Satyrical(natassia))\nWhale(natassia, raoul) -> not Subtitle(natassia, raoul)\n\nnot Uncurving(raoul)\n\nnot Uncurving(raoul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The tera is debonaire. The tera weary the marlane. The marlane socialise the tera. The marlane socialise the fae. The marlane does not visit the tera. The fae is zillion. The fae socialise the ola. The fae weary the tera. The fae weary the marlane. The fae weary the ola. The ola is unsalted. The ola dehumanize the tera. The ola does not need the fae. The ola does not see the tera. The ola socialise the fae. The ola weary the tera. If something weary the ola then it socialise the tera. If the ola weary the tera and the tera weary the marlane then the tera dehumanize the marlane. If the fae is zillion and the fae is extricable then the fae does not see the tera. If something weary the tera and it socialise the tera then the tera weary the ola. If something is frothy and it socialise the ola then it is unsalted. If something is frothy then it weary the fae. If something socialise the tera and it weary the marlane then the marlane is not unsalted. If the marlane socialise the tera then the marlane does not visit the tera. The fae dehumanize the ola.", "logic": "\nDebonaire(tera)\nWeary(tera, marlane)\nSocialise(marlane, tera)\nSocialise(marlane, fae)\nnot Weary(marlane, tera)\nZillion(fae)\nSocialise(fae, ola)\nWeary(fae, tera)\nWeary(fae, marlane)\nWeary(fae, ola)\nUnsalted(ola)\nDehumanize(ola, tera)\nnot Dehumanize(ola, fae)\nnot Socialise(ola, tera)\nSocialise(ola, fae)\nWeary(ola, tera)\nforall x (Weary(x, ola) -> Socialise(x, tera))\nWeary(ola, tera) and Weary(tera, marlane) -> Dehumanize(tera, marlane)\nZillion(fae) and Extricable(fae) -> not Socialise(fae, tera)\nforall x (Weary(x, tera) and Socialise(x, tera) -> Weary(tera, ola))\nforall x (Frothy(x) and Socialise(x, ola) -> Unsalted(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) -> Weary(x, fae))\nforall x (Socialise(x, tera) and Weary(x, marlane) -> not Unsalted(marlane))\nSocialise(marlane, tera) -> not Weary(marlane, tera)\n\nDehumanize(fae, ola)\n\nDehumanize(fae, ola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "Vanya is pellucid. Vanya is shameless. Vanya is gawky. Vanya is hulking. Vanya is connubial. Vanya is surreal. Rosene is pellucid. Rosene is fortunate. Rosene is shameless. Rosene is hulking. Rosene is surreal. Russel is shameless. Russel is gawky. Russel is hulking. Russel is surreal. If something is hulking and connubial then it is gawky. If something is fortunate then it is pellucid. Round things are shameless. Big, gawky things are surreal. If Rosene is connubial then Rosene is pellucid. All gawky things are fortunate. If something is fortunate then it is surreal. All pellucid things are connubial. Vanya is shameless.", "logic": "\nPellucid(vanya)\nShameless(vanya)\nGawky(vanya)\nHulking(vanya)\nConnubial(vanya)\nSurreal(vanya)\nPellucid(rosene)\nFortunate(rosene)\nShameless(rosene)\nHulking(rosene)\nSurreal(rosene)\nShameless(russel)\nGawky(russel)\nHulking(russel)\nSurreal(russel)\nforall x (Hulking(x) and Connubial(x) -> Gawky(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Pellucid(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) and Gawky(x) -> Surreal(x))\nConnubial(rosene) -> Pellucid(rosene)\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Surreal(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) -> Connubial(x))\n\nShameless(vanya)\n\ntherefore Shameless(vanya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Petrina is dorian. Petrina is heartsick. Petrina is abomasal. Petrina is peaceful. Petrina is snappish. Petrina is liquefied. Marilee is dorian. Marilee is tingling. Marilee is heartsick. Marilee is peaceful. Marilee is liquefied. Burt is heartsick. Burt is abomasal. Burt is peaceful. Burt is liquefied. If something is peaceful and snappish then it is abomasal. If something is tingling then it is dorian. Round things are heartsick. Big, abomasal things are liquefied. If Marilee is snappish then Marilee is dorian. All abomasal things are tingling. If something is tingling then it is liquefied. All dorian things are snappish. Petrina is not dorian.", "logic": "\nDorian(petrina)\nHeartsick(petrina)\nAbomasal(petrina)\nPeaceful(petrina)\nSnappish(petrina)\nLiquefied(petrina)\nDorian(marilee)\nTingling(marilee)\nHeartsick(marilee)\nPeaceful(marilee)\nLiquefied(marilee)\nHeartsick(burt)\nAbomasal(burt)\nPeaceful(burt)\nLiquefied(burt)\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and Snappish(x) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Tingling(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Liquefied(x) -> Heartsick(x))\nforall x (Dorian(x) and Abomasal(x) -> Liquefied(x))\nSnappish(marilee) -> Dorian(marilee)\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Tingling(x))\nforall x (Tingling(x) -> Liquefied(x))\nforall x (Dorian(x) -> Snappish(x))\n\nnot Dorian(petrina)\n\ntherefore Dorian(petrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Rudyard is fretful. Rudyard is raunchy. Rudyard is unrepaired. Rudyard is distrait. Rudyard is precarious. Rudyard is dilettante. Nelia is fretful. Nelia is sterilised. Nelia is raunchy. Nelia is distrait. Nelia is dilettante. Emmie is raunchy. Emmie is unrepaired. Emmie is distrait. Emmie is dilettante. If something is distrait and precarious then it is unrepaired. If something is sterilised then it is fretful. Round things are raunchy. Big, unrepaired things are dilettante. If Nelia is precarious then Nelia is fretful. All unrepaired things are sterilised. If something is sterilised then it is dilettante. All fretful things are precarious. Nelia is precarious.", "logic": "\nFretful(rudyard)\nRaunchy(rudyard)\nUnrepaired(rudyard)\nDistrait(rudyard)\nPrecarious(rudyard)\nDilettante(rudyard)\nFretful(nelia)\nSterilised(nelia)\nRaunchy(nelia)\nDistrait(nelia)\nDilettante(nelia)\nRaunchy(emmie)\nUnrepaired(emmie)\nDistrait(emmie)\nDilettante(emmie)\nforall x (Distrait(x) and Precarious(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nforall x (Sterilised(x) -> Fretful(x))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Raunchy(x))\nforall x (Fretful(x) and Unrepaired(x) -> Dilettante(x))\nPrecarious(nelia) -> Fretful(nelia)\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) -> Sterilised(x))\nforall x (Sterilised(x) -> Dilettante(x))\nforall x (Fretful(x) -> Precarious(x))\n\nPrecarious(nelia)\n\nFretful(nelia) and forall x (Fretful(x) -> Precarious(x)) -> therefore Precarious(nelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Latashia is amorphous. Latashia is cramped. Latashia is nonfatal. Latashia is marxist. Latashia is mensural. Latashia is jewish. Friedrich is amorphous. Friedrich is onetime. Friedrich is cramped. Friedrich is marxist. Friedrich is jewish. Delilah is cramped. Delilah is nonfatal. Delilah is marxist. Delilah is jewish. If something is marxist and mensural then it is nonfatal. If something is onetime then it is amorphous. Round things are cramped. Big, nonfatal things are jewish. If Friedrich is mensural then Friedrich is amorphous. All nonfatal things are onetime. If something is onetime then it is jewish. All amorphous things are mensural. Delilah is not onetime.", "logic": "\nAmorphous(latashia)\nCramped(latashia)\nNonfatal(latashia)\nMarxist(latashia)\nMensural(latashia)\nJewish(latashia)\nAmorphous(friedrich)\nOnetime(friedrich)\nCramped(friedrich)\nMarxist(friedrich)\nJewish(friedrich)\nCramped(delilah)\nNonfatal(delilah)\nMarxist(delilah)\nJewish(delilah)\nforall x (Marxist(x) and Mensural(x) -> Nonfatal(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Amorphous(x))\nforall x (Jewish(x) -> Cramped(x))\nforall x (Amorphous(x) and Nonfatal(x) -> Jewish(x))\nMensural(friedrich) -> Amorphous(friedrich)\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) -> Onetime(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Jewish(x))\nforall x (Amorphous(x) -> Mensural(x))\n\nnot Onetime(delilah)\n\nNonfatal(delilah) and forall x (Nonfatal(x) -> Onetime(x)) -> therefore Onetime(delilah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Rora is unlogical. Rora is ochre. Rora is polish. Rora is kurdish. Rora is sere. Rora is focal. Edouard is unlogical. Edouard is roily. Edouard is ochre. Edouard is kurdish. Edouard is focal. Nolie is ochre. Nolie is polish. Nolie is kurdish. Nolie is focal. If something is kurdish and sere then it is polish. If something is roily then it is unlogical. Round things are ochre. Big, polish things are focal. If Edouard is sere then Edouard is unlogical. All polish things are roily. If something is roily then it is focal. All unlogical things are sere. Nolie is unlogical.", "logic": "\nUnlogical(rora)\nOchre(rora)\nPolish(rora)\nKurdish(rora)\nSere(rora)\nFocal(rora)\nUnlogical(edouard)\nRoily(edouard)\nOchre(edouard)\nKurdish(edouard)\nFocal(edouard)\nOchre(nolie)\nPolish(nolie)\nKurdish(nolie)\nFocal(nolie)\nforall x (Kurdish(x) and Sere(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Ochre(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) and Polish(x) -> Focal(x))\nSere(edouard) -> Unlogical(edouard)\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Roily(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Focal(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> Sere(x))\n\nUnlogical(nolie)\n\nPolish(nolie) and forall x (Polish(x) -> Roily(x)) -> therefore Roily(nolie) Roily(nolie) and forall x (Roily(x) -> Unlogical(x)) -> therefore Unlogical(nolie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Cammie is adapted. Cammie is bosky. Cammie is unsigned. Cammie is penciled. Cammie is defendable. Cammie is ringleted. Wilow is adapted. Wilow is ibsenian. Wilow is bosky. Wilow is penciled. Wilow is ringleted. Aleda is bosky. Aleda is unsigned. Aleda is penciled. Aleda is ringleted. If something is penciled and defendable then it is unsigned. If something is ibsenian then it is adapted. Round things are bosky. Big, unsigned things are ringleted. If Wilow is defendable then Wilow is adapted. All unsigned things are ibsenian. If something is ibsenian then it is ringleted. All adapted things are defendable. Wilow is not unsigned.", "logic": "\nAdapted(cammie)\nBosky(cammie)\nUnsigned(cammie)\nPenciled(cammie)\nDefendable(cammie)\nRingleted(cammie)\nAdapted(wilow)\nIbsenian(wilow)\nBosky(wilow)\nPenciled(wilow)\nRingleted(wilow)\nBosky(aleda)\nUnsigned(aleda)\nPenciled(aleda)\nRingleted(aleda)\nforall x (Penciled(x) and Defendable(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Adapted(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) -> Bosky(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) and Unsigned(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nDefendable(wilow) -> Adapted(wilow)\nforall x (Unsigned(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) -> Defendable(x))\n\nnot Unsigned(wilow)\n\nAdapted(wilow) and forall x (Adapted(x) -> Defendable(x)) -> therefore Defendable(wilow) Penciled(wilow) and Defendable(wilow) and forall x (Penciled(x) and Defendable(x) -> Unsigned(x)) -> therefore Unsigned(wilow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Nicolas is south. Nicolas is cubelike. Nicolas is degenerate. Nicolas is bodied. Nicolas is weightless. Nicolas is anaglyptic. Gwennie is south. Gwennie is fiery. Gwennie is cubelike. Gwennie is bodied. Gwennie is anaglyptic. Broderick is cubelike. Broderick is degenerate. Broderick is bodied. Broderick is anaglyptic. If something is bodied and weightless then it is degenerate. If something is fiery then it is south. Round things are cubelike. Big, degenerate things are anaglyptic. If Gwennie is weightless then Gwennie is south. All degenerate things are fiery. If something is fiery then it is anaglyptic. All south things are weightless. Broderick is weightless.", "logic": "\nSouth(nicolas)\nCubelike(nicolas)\nDegenerate(nicolas)\nBodied(nicolas)\nWeightless(nicolas)\nAnaglyptic(nicolas)\nSouth(gwennie)\nFiery(gwennie)\nCubelike(gwennie)\nBodied(gwennie)\nAnaglyptic(gwennie)\nCubelike(broderick)\nDegenerate(broderick)\nBodied(broderick)\nAnaglyptic(broderick)\nforall x (Bodied(x) and Weightless(x) -> Degenerate(x))\nforall x (Fiery(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (South(x) and Degenerate(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nWeightless(gwennie) -> South(gwennie)\nforall x (Degenerate(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Fiery(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nforall x (South(x) -> Weightless(x))\n\nWeightless(broderick)\n\nDegenerate(broderick) and forall x (Degenerate(x) -> Fiery(x)) -> therefore Fiery(broderick) Fiery(broderick) and forall x (Fiery(x) -> South(x)) -> therefore South(broderick) South(broderick) and forall x (South(x) -> Weightless(x)) -> therefore Weightless(broderick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Allsun is unrealized. Allsun is strong. Allsun is diastolic. Allsun is laden. Allsun is unlikable. Allsun is tremulous. Ilona is unrealized. Ilona is agape. Ilona is strong. Ilona is laden. Ilona is tremulous. Jada is strong. Jada is diastolic. Jada is laden. Jada is tremulous. If something is laden and unlikable then it is diastolic. If something is agape then it is unrealized. Round things are strong. Big, diastolic things are tremulous. If Ilona is unlikable then Ilona is unrealized. All diastolic things are agape. If something is agape then it is tremulous. All unrealized things are unlikable. Jada is not unlikable.", "logic": "\nUnrealized(allsun)\nStrong(allsun)\nDiastolic(allsun)\nLaden(allsun)\nUnlikable(allsun)\nTremulous(allsun)\nUnrealized(ilona)\nAgape(ilona)\nStrong(ilona)\nLaden(ilona)\nTremulous(ilona)\nStrong(jada)\nDiastolic(jada)\nLaden(jada)\nTremulous(jada)\nforall x (Laden(x) and Unlikable(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Unrealized(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Strong(x))\nforall x (Unrealized(x) and Diastolic(x) -> Tremulous(x))\nUnlikable(ilona) -> Unrealized(ilona)\nforall x (Diastolic(x) -> Agape(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Tremulous(x))\nforall x (Unrealized(x) -> Unlikable(x))\n\nnot Unlikable(jada)\n\nDiastolic(jada) and forall x (Diastolic(x) -> Agape(x)) -> therefore Agape(jada) Agape(jada) and forall x (Agape(x) -> Unrealized(x)) -> therefore Unrealized(jada) Unrealized(jada) and forall x (Unrealized(x) -> Unlikable(x)) -> therefore Unlikable(jada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Esme is lentiform. Esme is briary. Whittaker is lubricious. Whittaker is lentiform. Whittaker is confiding. Milicent is lentiform. Milicent is briary. Milicent is reptilian. Pammi is sanitized. Pammi is briary. Green people are lubricious. Nice, lubricious people are sanitized. All lubricious, blastular people are reptilian. If someone is lubricious and sanitized then they are reptilian. If Pammi is lentiform then Pammi is reptilian. All confiding people are lentiform. All reptilian people are lentiform. If Pammi is sanitized then Pammi is briary. Whittaker is lentiform.", "logic": "\nLentiform(esme)\nBriary(esme)\nLubricious(whittaker)\nLentiform(whittaker)\nConfiding(whittaker)\nLentiform(milicent)\nBriary(milicent)\nReptilian(milicent)\nSanitized(pammi)\nBriary(pammi)\nforall x (Briary(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Reptilian(x) and Lubricious(x) -> Sanitized(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Blastular(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Sanitized(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nLentiform(pammi) -> Reptilian(pammi)\nforall x (Confiding(x) -> Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Reptilian(x) -> Lentiform(x))\nSanitized(pammi) -> Briary(pammi)\n\nLentiform(whittaker)\n\ntherefore Lentiform(whittaker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Ximenez is cachectic. Ximenez is tearless. Diamond is episodic. Diamond is cachectic. Diamond is echoic. Casper is cachectic. Casper is tearless. Casper is impressed. Karl is parentless. Karl is tearless. Green people are episodic. Nice, episodic people are parentless. All episodic, residual people are impressed. If someone is episodic and parentless then they are impressed. If Karl is cachectic then Karl is impressed. All echoic people are cachectic. All impressed people are cachectic. If Karl is parentless then Karl is tearless. Ximenez is not tearless.", "logic": "\nCachectic(ximenez)\nTearless(ximenez)\nEpisodic(diamond)\nCachectic(diamond)\nEchoic(diamond)\nCachectic(casper)\nTearless(casper)\nImpressed(casper)\nParentless(karl)\nTearless(karl)\nforall x (Tearless(x) -> Episodic(x))\nforall x (Impressed(x) and Episodic(x) -> Parentless(x))\nforall x (Episodic(x) and Residual(x) -> Impressed(x))\nforall x (Episodic(x) and Parentless(x) -> Impressed(x))\nCachectic(karl) -> Impressed(karl)\nforall x (Echoic(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nforall x (Impressed(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nParentless(karl) -> Tearless(karl)\n\nnot Tearless(ximenez)\n\ntherefore Tearless(ximenez)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Bernardo is sottish. Bernardo is homosexual. Kin is priestly. Kin is sottish. Kin is merciless. Amargo is sottish. Amargo is homosexual. Amargo is seriocomic. Eleanor is phrenic. Eleanor is homosexual. Green people are priestly. Nice, priestly people are phrenic. All priestly, benthal people are seriocomic. If someone is priestly and phrenic then they are seriocomic. If Eleanor is sottish then Eleanor is seriocomic. All merciless people are sottish. All seriocomic people are sottish. If Eleanor is phrenic then Eleanor is homosexual. Eleanor is priestly.", "logic": "\nSottish(bernardo)\nHomosexual(bernardo)\nPriestly(kin)\nSottish(kin)\nMerciless(kin)\nSottish(amargo)\nHomosexual(amargo)\nSeriocomic(amargo)\nPhrenic(eleanor)\nHomosexual(eleanor)\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Priestly(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) and Priestly(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Priestly(x) and Benthal(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\nforall x (Priestly(x) and Phrenic(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\nSottish(eleanor) -> Seriocomic(eleanor)\nforall x (Merciless(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) -> Sottish(x))\nPhrenic(eleanor) -> Homosexual(eleanor)\n\nPriestly(eleanor)\n\nHomosexual(eleanor) and forall x (Homosexual(x) -> Priestly(x)) -> therefore Priestly(eleanor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Shannon is tumescent. Shannon is semitropic. Adela is mancunian. Adela is tumescent. Adela is galvanic. Gretchen is tumescent. Gretchen is semitropic. Gretchen is undeceived. Nari is sorrel. Nari is semitropic. Green people are mancunian. Nice, mancunian people are sorrel. All mancunian, minuscular people are undeceived. If someone is mancunian and sorrel then they are undeceived. If Nari is tumescent then Nari is undeceived. All galvanic people are tumescent. All undeceived people are tumescent. If Nari is sorrel then Nari is semitropic. Nari is not mancunian.", "logic": "\nTumescent(shannon)\nSemitropic(shannon)\nMancunian(adela)\nTumescent(adela)\nGalvanic(adela)\nTumescent(gretchen)\nSemitropic(gretchen)\nUndeceived(gretchen)\nSorrel(nari)\nSemitropic(nari)\nforall x (Semitropic(x) -> Mancunian(x))\nforall x (Undeceived(x) and Mancunian(x) -> Sorrel(x))\nforall x (Mancunian(x) and Minuscular(x) -> Undeceived(x))\nforall x (Mancunian(x) and Sorrel(x) -> Undeceived(x))\nTumescent(nari) -> Undeceived(nari)\nforall x (Galvanic(x) -> Tumescent(x))\nforall x (Undeceived(x) -> Tumescent(x))\nSorrel(nari) -> Semitropic(nari)\n\nnot Mancunian(nari)\n\nSemitropic(nari) and forall x (Semitropic(x) -> Mancunian(x)) -> therefore Mancunian(nari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Barn is middlemost. Barn is opencast. Neall is mandibular. Neall is middlemost. Neall is artistic. Klarika is middlemost. Klarika is opencast. Klarika is piquant. Lucy is peptic. Lucy is opencast. Green people are mandibular. Nice, mandibular people are peptic. All mandibular, foppish people are piquant. If someone is mandibular and peptic then they are piquant. If Lucy is middlemost then Lucy is piquant. All artistic people are middlemost. All piquant people are middlemost. If Lucy is peptic then Lucy is opencast. Klarika is peptic.", "logic": "\nMiddlemost(barn)\nOpencast(barn)\nMandibular(neall)\nMiddlemost(neall)\nArtistic(neall)\nMiddlemost(klarika)\nOpencast(klarika)\nPiquant(klarika)\nPeptic(lucy)\nOpencast(lucy)\nforall x (Opencast(x) -> Mandibular(x))\nforall x (Piquant(x) and Mandibular(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) and Foppish(x) -> Piquant(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) and Peptic(x) -> Piquant(x))\nMiddlemost(lucy) -> Piquant(lucy)\nforall x (Artistic(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Piquant(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nPeptic(lucy) -> Opencast(lucy)\n\nPeptic(klarika)\n\nOpencast(klarika) and forall x (Opencast(x) -> Mandibular(x)) -> therefore Mandibular(klarika) Piquant(klarika) and Mandibular(klarika) and forall x (Piquant(x) and Mandibular(x) -> Peptic(x)) -> therefore Peptic(klarika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Tremaine is stabile. Tremaine is threescore. Chrysa is prognathic. Chrysa is stabile. Chrysa is gangly. Rosy is stabile. Rosy is threescore. Rosy is breakaway. Calley is fake. Calley is threescore. Green people are prognathic. Nice, prognathic people are fake. All prognathic, monatomic people are breakaway. If someone is prognathic and fake then they are breakaway. If Calley is stabile then Calley is breakaway. All gangly people are stabile. All breakaway people are stabile. If Calley is fake then Calley is threescore. Rosy is not fake.", "logic": "\nStabile(tremaine)\nThreescore(tremaine)\nPrognathic(chrysa)\nStabile(chrysa)\nGangly(chrysa)\nStabile(rosy)\nThreescore(rosy)\nBreakaway(rosy)\nFake(calley)\nThreescore(calley)\nforall x (Threescore(x) -> Prognathic(x))\nforall x (Breakaway(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Fake(x))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) and Monatomic(x) -> Breakaway(x))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) and Fake(x) -> Breakaway(x))\nStabile(calley) -> Breakaway(calley)\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Stabile(x))\nforall x (Breakaway(x) -> Stabile(x))\nFake(calley) -> Threescore(calley)\n\nnot Fake(rosy)\n\nThreescore(rosy) and forall x (Threescore(x) -> Prognathic(x)) -> therefore Prognathic(rosy) Breakaway(rosy) and Prognathic(rosy) and forall x (Breakaway(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Fake(x)) -> therefore Fake(rosy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Lina is cyanophyte. Lina is fatalistic. Dayna is cherty. Dayna is cyanophyte. Dayna is helical. Magna is cyanophyte. Magna is fatalistic. Magna is heroical. Auroora is fabulous. Auroora is fatalistic. Green people are cherty. Nice, cherty people are fabulous. All cherty, extrusive people are heroical. If someone is cherty and fabulous then they are heroical. If Auroora is cyanophyte then Auroora is heroical. All helical people are cyanophyte. All heroical people are cyanophyte. If Auroora is fabulous then Auroora is fatalistic. Auroora is cyanophyte.", "logic": "\nCyanophyte(lina)\nFatalistic(lina)\nCherty(dayna)\nCyanophyte(dayna)\nHelical(dayna)\nCyanophyte(magna)\nFatalistic(magna)\nHeroical(magna)\nFabulous(auroora)\nFatalistic(auroora)\nforall x (Fatalistic(x) -> Cherty(x))\nforall x (Heroical(x) and Cherty(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Cherty(x) and Extrusive(x) -> Heroical(x))\nforall x (Cherty(x) and Fabulous(x) -> Heroical(x))\nCyanophyte(auroora) -> Heroical(auroora)\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Cyanophyte(x))\nforall x (Heroical(x) -> Cyanophyte(x))\nFabulous(auroora) -> Fatalistic(auroora)\n\nCyanophyte(auroora)\n\nFatalistic(auroora) and forall x (Fatalistic(x) -> Cherty(x)) -> therefore Cherty(auroora) Cherty(auroora) and Fabulous(auroora) and forall x (Cherty(x) and Fabulous(x) -> Heroical(x)) -> therefore Heroical(auroora) Heroical(auroora) and forall x (Heroical(x) -> Cyanophyte(x)) -> therefore Cyanophyte(auroora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Brewster is rutty. Brewster is leathered. Shaylynn is diarrheal. Shaylynn is rutty. Shaylynn is festive. Krissie is rutty. Krissie is leathered. Krissie is engaging. Aidan is supersonic. Aidan is leathered. Green people are diarrheal. Nice, diarrheal people are supersonic. All diarrheal, thorough people are engaging. If someone is diarrheal and supersonic then they are engaging. If Aidan is rutty then Aidan is engaging. All festive people are rutty. All engaging people are rutty. If Aidan is supersonic then Aidan is leathered. Aidan is not rutty.", "logic": "\nRutty(brewster)\nLeathered(brewster)\nDiarrheal(shaylynn)\nRutty(shaylynn)\nFestive(shaylynn)\nRutty(krissie)\nLeathered(krissie)\nEngaging(krissie)\nSupersonic(aidan)\nLeathered(aidan)\nforall x (Leathered(x) -> Diarrheal(x))\nforall x (Engaging(x) and Diarrheal(x) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) and Thorough(x) -> Engaging(x))\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) and Supersonic(x) -> Engaging(x))\nRutty(aidan) -> Engaging(aidan)\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Rutty(x))\nforall x (Engaging(x) -> Rutty(x))\nSupersonic(aidan) -> Leathered(aidan)\n\nnot Rutty(aidan)\n\nLeathered(aidan) and forall x (Leathered(x) -> Diarrheal(x)) -> therefore Diarrheal(aidan) Diarrheal(aidan) and Supersonic(aidan) and forall x (Diarrheal(x) and Supersonic(x) -> Engaging(x)) -> therefore Engaging(aidan) Engaging(aidan) and forall x (Engaging(x) -> Rutty(x)) -> therefore Rutty(aidan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Amalle is unaccepted. Amalle is acquainted. Maddi is resentful. Maddi is unaccepted. Maddi is avertible. Mabel is unaccepted. Mabel is acquainted. Mabel is preachy. Henri is tentative. Henri is acquainted. Green people are resentful. Nice, resentful people are tentative. All resentful, anatropous people are preachy. If someone is resentful and tentative then they are preachy. If Henri is unaccepted then Henri is preachy. All avertible people are unaccepted. All preachy people are unaccepted. If Henri is tentative then Henri is acquainted. Maddi is not tentative.", "logic": "\nUnaccepted(amalle)\nAcquainted(amalle)\nResentful(maddi)\nUnaccepted(maddi)\nAvertible(maddi)\nUnaccepted(mabel)\nAcquainted(mabel)\nPreachy(mabel)\nTentative(henri)\nAcquainted(henri)\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> Resentful(x))\nforall x (Preachy(x) and Resentful(x) -> Tentative(x))\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Anatropous(x) -> Preachy(x))\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Tentative(x) -> Preachy(x))\nUnaccepted(henri) -> Preachy(henri)\nforall x (Avertible(x) -> Unaccepted(x))\nforall x (Preachy(x) -> Unaccepted(x))\nTentative(henri) -> Acquainted(henri)\n\nnot Tentative(maddi)\n\nforall x (Preachy(x) and Resentful(x) -> Tentative(x)) <- forall x (Resentful(x) and Anatropous(x) -> Preachy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Ephrayim is foliose. Ephrayim is centenary. Ishmael is drugless. Ishmael is foliose. Ishmael is czarist. Ruperta is foliose. Ruperta is centenary. Ruperta is immense. Kati is credulous. Kati is centenary. Green people are drugless. Nice, drugless people are credulous. All drugless, fresh people are immense. If someone is drugless and credulous then they are immense. If Kati is foliose then Kati is immense. All czarist people are foliose. All immense people are foliose. If Kati is credulous then Kati is centenary. Ephrayim is credulous.", "logic": "\nFoliose(ephrayim)\nCentenary(ephrayim)\nDrugless(ishmael)\nFoliose(ishmael)\nCzarist(ishmael)\nFoliose(ruperta)\nCentenary(ruperta)\nImmense(ruperta)\nCredulous(kati)\nCentenary(kati)\nforall x (Centenary(x) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Immense(x) and Drugless(x) -> Credulous(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) and Fresh(x) -> Immense(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) and Credulous(x) -> Immense(x))\nFoliose(kati) -> Immense(kati)\nforall x (Czarist(x) -> Foliose(x))\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Foliose(x))\nCredulous(kati) -> Centenary(kati)\n\nCredulous(ephrayim)\n\nforall x (Immense(x) and Drugless(x) -> Credulous(x)) <- forall x (Drugless(x) and Fresh(x) -> Immense(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Sly is collegial. Sly is blushful. Myranda is folding. Myranda is collegial. Myranda is mass. Jilli is collegial. Jilli is blushful. Jilli is extensive. Amelia is apivorous. Amelia is blushful. Green people are folding. Nice, folding people are apivorous. All folding, hallowed people are extensive. If someone is folding and apivorous then they are extensive. If Amelia is collegial then Amelia is extensive. All mass people are collegial. All extensive people are collegial. If Amelia is apivorous then Amelia is blushful. Myranda is not extensive.", "logic": "\nCollegial(sly)\nBlushful(sly)\nFolding(myranda)\nCollegial(myranda)\nMass(myranda)\nCollegial(jilli)\nBlushful(jilli)\nExtensive(jilli)\nApivorous(amelia)\nBlushful(amelia)\nforall x (Blushful(x) -> Folding(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Folding(x) -> Apivorous(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) and Hallowed(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) and Apivorous(x) -> Extensive(x))\nCollegial(amelia) -> Extensive(amelia)\nforall x (Mass(x) -> Collegial(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Collegial(x))\nApivorous(amelia) -> Blushful(amelia)\n\nnot Extensive(myranda)\n\nforall x (Folding(x) and Apivorous(x) -> Extensive(x)) <- forall x (Extensive(x) and Folding(x) -> Apivorous(x)) <- forall x (Folding(x) and Hallowed(x) -> Extensive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Neall is aphaeretic. Neall is beamy. Fyodor is giving. Fyodor is aphaeretic. Fyodor is bilabial. Laurice is aphaeretic. Laurice is beamy. Laurice is unwatchful. Carlita is dialectic. Carlita is beamy. Green people are giving. Nice, giving people are dialectic. All giving, chinchy people are unwatchful. If someone is giving and dialectic then they are unwatchful. If Carlita is aphaeretic then Carlita is unwatchful. All bilabial people are aphaeretic. All unwatchful people are aphaeretic. If Carlita is dialectic then Carlita is beamy. Neall is unwatchful.", "logic": "\nAphaeretic(neall)\nBeamy(neall)\nGiving(fyodor)\nAphaeretic(fyodor)\nBilabial(fyodor)\nAphaeretic(laurice)\nBeamy(laurice)\nUnwatchful(laurice)\nDialectic(carlita)\nBeamy(carlita)\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Giving(x))\nforall x (Unwatchful(x) and Giving(x) -> Dialectic(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and Chinchy(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and Dialectic(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\nAphaeretic(carlita) -> Unwatchful(carlita)\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Unwatchful(x) -> Aphaeretic(x))\nDialectic(carlita) -> Beamy(carlita)\n\nUnwatchful(neall)\n\nforall x (Giving(x) and Dialectic(x) -> Unwatchful(x)) <- forall x (Unwatchful(x) and Giving(x) -> Dialectic(x)) <- forall x (Giving(x) and Chinchy(x) -> Unwatchful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Meggan is nosocomial. Meggan is doddery. Chan is myeloid. Chan is nosocomial. Chan is idiomatic. Dorelle is nosocomial. Dorelle is doddery. Dorelle is consultive. Goober is aliform. Goober is doddery. Green people are myeloid. Nice, myeloid people are aliform. All myeloid, boskopoid people are consultive. If someone is myeloid and aliform then they are consultive. If Goober is nosocomial then Goober is consultive. All idiomatic people are nosocomial. All consultive people are nosocomial. If Goober is aliform then Goober is doddery. Meggan is not idiomatic.", "logic": "\nNosocomial(meggan)\nDoddery(meggan)\nMyeloid(chan)\nNosocomial(chan)\nIdiomatic(chan)\nNosocomial(dorelle)\nDoddery(dorelle)\nConsultive(dorelle)\nAliform(goober)\nDoddery(goober)\nforall x (Doddery(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Consultive(x) and Myeloid(x) -> Aliform(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) and Boskopoid(x) -> Consultive(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) and Aliform(x) -> Consultive(x))\nNosocomial(goober) -> Consultive(goober)\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) -> Nosocomial(x))\nforall x (Consultive(x) -> Nosocomial(x))\nAliform(goober) -> Doddery(goober)\n\nnot Idiomatic(meggan)\n\nnot Idiomatic(meggan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Clair is antic. Clair is deviate. Grayce is south. Grayce is antic. Grayce is zeroth. Xaviera is antic. Xaviera is deviate. Xaviera is attachable. Harlan is romansh. Harlan is deviate. Green people are south. Nice, south people are romansh. All south, walloping people are attachable. If someone is south and romansh then they are attachable. If Harlan is antic then Harlan is attachable. All zeroth people are antic. All attachable people are antic. If Harlan is romansh then Harlan is deviate. Grayce is walloping.", "logic": "\nAntic(clair)\nDeviate(clair)\nSouth(grayce)\nAntic(grayce)\nZeroth(grayce)\nAntic(xaviera)\nDeviate(xaviera)\nAttachable(xaviera)\nRomansh(harlan)\nDeviate(harlan)\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (Attachable(x) and South(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (South(x) and Walloping(x) -> Attachable(x))\nforall x (South(x) and Romansh(x) -> Attachable(x))\nAntic(harlan) -> Attachable(harlan)\nforall x (Zeroth(x) -> Antic(x))\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> Antic(x))\nRomansh(harlan) -> Deviate(harlan)\n\nWalloping(grayce)\n\nWalloping(grayce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Georgie is starry. Georgie is avirulent. Adriana is quondam. Adriana is starry. Adriana is magnetized. Umberto is starry. Umberto is avirulent. Umberto is vinaceous. Lizzy is bustling. Lizzy is avirulent. Green people are quondam. Nice, quondam people are bustling. All quondam, spiffing people are vinaceous. If someone is quondam and bustling then they are vinaceous. If Lizzy is starry then Lizzy is vinaceous. All magnetized people are starry. All vinaceous people are starry. If Lizzy is bustling then Lizzy is avirulent. Georgie is not spiffing.", "logic": "\nStarry(georgie)\nAvirulent(georgie)\nQuondam(adriana)\nStarry(adriana)\nMagnetized(adriana)\nStarry(umberto)\nAvirulent(umberto)\nVinaceous(umberto)\nBustling(lizzy)\nAvirulent(lizzy)\nforall x (Avirulent(x) -> Quondam(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) and Quondam(x) -> Bustling(x))\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Spiffing(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Bustling(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\nStarry(lizzy) -> Vinaceous(lizzy)\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Starry(x))\nBustling(lizzy) -> Avirulent(lizzy)\n\nnot Spiffing(georgie)\n\nnot Spiffing(georgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Chester is awesome. Chester is avocado. Lonni is saucy. Lonni is awesome. Lonni is untwisted. Odysseus is awesome. Odysseus is avocado. Odysseus is postmodern. Lindy is petrifying. Lindy is avocado. Green people are saucy. Nice, saucy people are petrifying. All saucy, seated people are postmodern. If someone is saucy and petrifying then they are postmodern. If Lindy is awesome then Lindy is postmodern. All untwisted people are awesome. All postmodern people are awesome. If Lindy is petrifying then Lindy is avocado. Odysseus is untwisted.", "logic": "\nAwesome(chester)\nAvocado(chester)\nSaucy(lonni)\nAwesome(lonni)\nUntwisted(lonni)\nAwesome(odysseus)\nAvocado(odysseus)\nPostmodern(odysseus)\nPetrifying(lindy)\nAvocado(lindy)\nforall x (Avocado(x) -> Saucy(x))\nforall x (Postmodern(x) and Saucy(x) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Saucy(x) and Seated(x) -> Postmodern(x))\nforall x (Saucy(x) and Petrifying(x) -> Postmodern(x))\nAwesome(lindy) -> Postmodern(lindy)\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Awesome(x))\nforall x (Postmodern(x) -> Awesome(x))\nPetrifying(lindy) -> Avocado(lindy)\n\nUntwisted(odysseus)\n\nUntwisted(odysseus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The oren does not eat the cesar. The cesar ferment the oren. The cesar enquire the oren. The cesar is limpid. The cesar is renegade. The cesar is pesky. The cesar lament the oren. All limpid things are not untapped. If something enquire the cesar and it is limpid then it is pesky. If something enquire the oren then the oren lament the cesar. If something is muscular then it lament the oren. If something is renegade then it does not eat the cesar. If something lament the cesar then it is limpid. The cesar is limpid.", "logic": "\nnot Enquire(oren, cesar)\nFerment(cesar, oren)\nEnquire(cesar, oren)\nLimpid(cesar)\nRenegade(cesar)\nPesky(cesar)\nLament(cesar, oren)\nforall x (Limpid(x) -> not Untapped(x))\nforall x (Enquire(x, cesar) and Limpid(x) -> Pesky(x))\nforall x (Enquire(x, oren) -> Lament(oren, cesar))\nforall x (Muscular(x) -> Lament(x, oren))\nforall x (Renegade(x) -> not Enquire(x, cesar))\nforall x (Lament(x, cesar) -> Limpid(x))\n\nLimpid(cesar)\n\ntherefore Limpid(cesar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The jaquelin does not eat the harli. The harli tailgate the jaquelin. The harli skate the jaquelin. The harli is estuarial. The harli is insouciant. The harli is unformed. The harli carbonate the jaquelin. All estuarial things are not tidal. If something skate the harli and it is estuarial then it is unformed. If something skate the jaquelin then the jaquelin carbonate the harli. If something is verified then it carbonate the jaquelin. If something is insouciant then it does not eat the harli. If something carbonate the harli then it is estuarial. The harli is not unformed.", "logic": "\nnot Skate(jaquelin, harli)\nTailgate(harli, jaquelin)\nSkate(harli, jaquelin)\nEstuarial(harli)\nInsouciant(harli)\nUnformed(harli)\nCarbonate(harli, jaquelin)\nforall x (Estuarial(x) -> not Tidal(x))\nforall x (Skate(x, harli) and Estuarial(x) -> Unformed(x))\nforall x (Skate(x, jaquelin) -> Carbonate(jaquelin, harli))\nforall x (Verified(x) -> Carbonate(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) -> not Skate(x, harli))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, harli) -> Estuarial(x))\n\nnot Unformed(harli)\n\ntherefore Unformed(harli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The merrill does not eat the hudson. The hudson lame the merrill. The hudson besmear the merrill. The hudson is northward. The hudson is concluding. The hudson is piano. The hudson contravene the merrill. All northward things are not conceptive. If something besmear the hudson and it is northward then it is piano. If something besmear the merrill then the merrill contravene the hudson. If something is eleventh then it contravene the merrill. If something is concluding then it does not eat the hudson. If something contravene the hudson then it is northward. The hudson does not eat the hudson.", "logic": "\nnot Besmear(merrill, hudson)\nLame(hudson, merrill)\nBesmear(hudson, merrill)\nNorthward(hudson)\nConcluding(hudson)\nPiano(hudson)\nContravene(hudson, merrill)\nforall x (Northward(x) -> not Conceptive(x))\nforall x (Besmear(x, hudson) and Northward(x) -> Piano(x))\nforall x (Besmear(x, merrill) -> Contravene(merrill, hudson))\nforall x (Eleventh(x) -> Contravene(x, merrill))\nforall x (Concluding(x) -> not Besmear(x, hudson))\nforall x (Contravene(x, hudson) -> Northward(x))\n\nnot Besmear(hudson, hudson)\n\nConcluding(hudson) and forall x (Concluding(x) -> not Besmear(x, hudson)) -> therefore not Besmear(hudson, hudson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The denna does not eat the ofelia. The ofelia exorcise the denna. The ofelia rede the denna. The ofelia is bandaged. The ofelia is homonymic. The ofelia is basipetal. The ofelia remake the denna. All bandaged things are not blunt. If something rede the ofelia and it is bandaged then it is basipetal. If something rede the denna then the denna remake the ofelia. If something is palmy then it remake the denna. If something is homonymic then it does not eat the ofelia. If something remake the ofelia then it is bandaged. The ofelia rede the ofelia.", "logic": "\nnot Rede(denna, ofelia)\nExorcise(ofelia, denna)\nRede(ofelia, denna)\nBandaged(ofelia)\nHomonymic(ofelia)\nBasipetal(ofelia)\nRemake(ofelia, denna)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> not Blunt(x))\nforall x (Rede(x, ofelia) and Bandaged(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Rede(x, denna) -> Remake(denna, ofelia))\nforall x (Palmy(x) -> Remake(x, denna))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> not Rede(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Remake(x, ofelia) -> Bandaged(x))\n\nRede(ofelia, ofelia)\n\nHomonymic(ofelia) and forall x (Homonymic(x) -> not Rede(x, ofelia)) -> therefore not Rede(ofelia, ofelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The winnie does not eat the taryn. The taryn appreciate the winnie. The taryn mishandle the winnie. The taryn is pedal. The taryn is chuffed. The taryn is ambrosial. The taryn windsurf the winnie. All pedal things are not bilobated. If something mishandle the taryn and it is pedal then it is ambrosial. If something mishandle the winnie then the winnie windsurf the taryn. If something is unexciting then it windsurf the winnie. If something is chuffed then it does not eat the taryn. If something windsurf the taryn then it is pedal. The winnie is pedal.", "logic": "\nnot Mishandle(winnie, taryn)\nAppreciate(taryn, winnie)\nMishandle(taryn, winnie)\nPedal(taryn)\nChuffed(taryn)\nAmbrosial(taryn)\nWindsurf(taryn, winnie)\nforall x (Pedal(x) -> not Bilobated(x))\nforall x (Mishandle(x, taryn) and Pedal(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\nforall x (Mishandle(x, winnie) -> Windsurf(winnie, taryn))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) -> Windsurf(x, winnie))\nforall x (Chuffed(x) -> not Mishandle(x, taryn))\nforall x (Windsurf(x, taryn) -> Pedal(x))\n\nPedal(winnie)\n\nMishandle(taryn, winnie) and forall x (Mishandle(x, winnie) -> Windsurf(winnie, taryn)) -> therefore Windsurf(winnie, taryn) Windsurf(winnie, taryn) and forall x (Windsurf(x, taryn) -> Pedal(x)) -> therefore Pedal(winnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The sherwin does not eat the ashly. The ashly crest the sherwin. The ashly overshadow the sherwin. The ashly is aphonic. The ashly is judicable. The ashly is tsaristic. The ashly charter the sherwin. All aphonic things are not curving. If something overshadow the ashly and it is aphonic then it is tsaristic. If something overshadow the sherwin then the sherwin charter the ashly. If something is uncounted then it charter the sherwin. If something is judicable then it does not eat the ashly. If something charter the ashly then it is aphonic. The sherwin is not aphonic.", "logic": "\nnot Overshadow(sherwin, ashly)\nCrest(ashly, sherwin)\nOvershadow(ashly, sherwin)\nAphonic(ashly)\nJudicable(ashly)\nTsaristic(ashly)\nCharter(ashly, sherwin)\nforall x (Aphonic(x) -> not Curving(x))\nforall x (Overshadow(x, ashly) and Aphonic(x) -> Tsaristic(x))\nforall x (Overshadow(x, sherwin) -> Charter(sherwin, ashly))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Charter(x, sherwin))\nforall x (Judicable(x) -> not Overshadow(x, ashly))\nforall x (Charter(x, ashly) -> Aphonic(x))\n\nnot Aphonic(sherwin)\n\nOvershadow(ashly, sherwin) and forall x (Overshadow(x, sherwin) -> Charter(sherwin, ashly)) -> therefore Charter(sherwin, ashly) Charter(sherwin, ashly) and forall x (Charter(x, ashly) -> Aphonic(x)) -> therefore Aphonic(sherwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The giffy does not eat the fayth. The fayth socialize the giffy. The fayth resist the giffy. The fayth is syllabled. The fayth is beguiling. The fayth is epistolary. The fayth quash the giffy. All syllabled things are not sere. If something resist the fayth and it is syllabled then it is epistolary. If something resist the giffy then the giffy quash the fayth. If something is rhymeless then it quash the giffy. If something is beguiling then it does not eat the fayth. If something quash the fayth then it is syllabled. The giffy is not sere.", "logic": "\nnot Resist(giffy, fayth)\nSocialize(fayth, giffy)\nResist(fayth, giffy)\nSyllabled(fayth)\nBeguiling(fayth)\nEpistolary(fayth)\nQuash(fayth, giffy)\nforall x (Syllabled(x) -> not Sere(x))\nforall x (Resist(x, fayth) and Syllabled(x) -> Epistolary(x))\nforall x (Resist(x, giffy) -> Quash(giffy, fayth))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Quash(x, giffy))\nforall x (Beguiling(x) -> not Resist(x, fayth))\nforall x (Quash(x, fayth) -> Syllabled(x))\n\nnot Sere(giffy)\n\nResist(fayth, giffy) and forall x (Resist(x, giffy) -> Quash(giffy, fayth)) -> therefore Quash(giffy, fayth) Quash(giffy, fayth) and forall x (Quash(x, fayth) -> Syllabled(x)) -> therefore Syllabled(giffy) Syllabled(giffy) and forall x (Syllabled(x) -> not Sere(x)) -> therefore not Sere(giffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The cam does not eat the leeann. The leeann fabricate the cam. The leeann plaster the cam. The leeann is homonymic. The leeann is ambrosial. The leeann is proficient. The leeann strew the cam. All homonymic things are not chic. If something plaster the leeann and it is homonymic then it is proficient. If something plaster the cam then the cam strew the leeann. If something is bleached then it strew the cam. If something is ambrosial then it does not eat the leeann. If something strew the leeann then it is homonymic. The cam is chic.", "logic": "\nnot Plaster(cam, leeann)\nFabricate(leeann, cam)\nPlaster(leeann, cam)\nHomonymic(leeann)\nAmbrosial(leeann)\nProficient(leeann)\nStrew(leeann, cam)\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> not Chic(x))\nforall x (Plaster(x, leeann) and Homonymic(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Plaster(x, cam) -> Strew(cam, leeann))\nforall x (Bleached(x) -> Strew(x, cam))\nforall x (Ambrosial(x) -> not Plaster(x, leeann))\nforall x (Strew(x, leeann) -> Homonymic(x))\n\nChic(cam)\n\nPlaster(leeann, cam) and forall x (Plaster(x, cam) -> Strew(cam, leeann)) -> therefore Strew(cam, leeann) Strew(cam, leeann) and forall x (Strew(x, leeann) -> Homonymic(x)) -> therefore Homonymic(cam) Homonymic(cam) and forall x (Homonymic(x) -> not Chic(x)) -> therefore not Chic(cam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The sanford does not eat the niccolo. The niccolo enrich the sanford. The niccolo decamp the sanford. The niccolo is whopping. The niccolo is slippy. The niccolo is pushy. The niccolo wheeze the sanford. All whopping things are not praising. If something decamp the niccolo and it is whopping then it is pushy. If something decamp the sanford then the sanford wheeze the niccolo. If something is residuary then it wheeze the sanford. If something is slippy then it does not eat the niccolo. If something wheeze the niccolo then it is whopping. The sanford is not pushy.", "logic": "\nnot Decamp(sanford, niccolo)\nEnrich(niccolo, sanford)\nDecamp(niccolo, sanford)\nWhopping(niccolo)\nSlippy(niccolo)\nPushy(niccolo)\nWheeze(niccolo, sanford)\nforall x (Whopping(x) -> not Praising(x))\nforall x (Decamp(x, niccolo) and Whopping(x) -> Pushy(x))\nforall x (Decamp(x, sanford) -> Wheeze(sanford, niccolo))\nforall x (Residuary(x) -> Wheeze(x, sanford))\nforall x (Slippy(x) -> not Decamp(x, niccolo))\nforall x (Wheeze(x, niccolo) -> Whopping(x))\n\nnot Pushy(sanford)\n\nforall x (Decamp(x, niccolo) and Whopping(x) -> Pushy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The helli does not eat the dyanne. The dyanne jail the helli. The dyanne polka the helli. The dyanne is effaceable. The dyanne is elysian. The dyanne is antiquated. The dyanne oyster the helli. All effaceable things are not likely. If something polka the dyanne and it is effaceable then it is antiquated. If something polka the helli then the helli oyster the dyanne. If something is conjugal then it oyster the helli. If something is elysian then it does not eat the dyanne. If something oyster the dyanne then it is effaceable. The helli oyster the helli.", "logic": "\nnot Polka(helli, dyanne)\nJail(dyanne, helli)\nPolka(dyanne, helli)\nEffaceable(dyanne)\nElysian(dyanne)\nAntiquated(dyanne)\nOyster(dyanne, helli)\nforall x (Effaceable(x) -> not Likely(x))\nforall x (Polka(x, dyanne) and Effaceable(x) -> Antiquated(x))\nforall x (Polka(x, helli) -> Oyster(helli, dyanne))\nforall x (Conjugal(x) -> Oyster(x, helli))\nforall x (Elysian(x) -> not Polka(x, dyanne))\nforall x (Oyster(x, dyanne) -> Effaceable(x))\n\nOyster(helli, helli)\n\nforall x (Conjugal(x) -> Oyster(x, helli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The abagael does not eat the nolana. The nolana disunite the abagael. The nolana stuff the abagael. The nolana is blustering. The nolana is agonadal. The nolana is peccant. The nolana pule the abagael. All blustering things are not semiweekly. If something stuff the nolana and it is blustering then it is peccant. If something stuff the abagael then the abagael pule the nolana. If something is voltarian then it pule the abagael. If something is agonadal then it does not eat the nolana. If something pule the nolana then it is blustering. The abagael is not voltarian.", "logic": "\nnot Stuff(abagael, nolana)\nDisunite(nolana, abagael)\nStuff(nolana, abagael)\nBlustering(nolana)\nAgonadal(nolana)\nPeccant(nolana)\nPule(nolana, abagael)\nforall x (Blustering(x) -> not Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Stuff(x, nolana) and Blustering(x) -> Peccant(x))\nforall x (Stuff(x, abagael) -> Pule(abagael, nolana))\nforall x (Voltarian(x) -> Pule(x, abagael))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) -> not Stuff(x, nolana))\nforall x (Pule(x, nolana) -> Blustering(x))\n\nnot Voltarian(abagael)\n\nnot Voltarian(abagael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The easton does not eat the betsey. The betsey pour the easton. The betsey prevent the easton. The betsey is hertzian. The betsey is concessive. The betsey is articular. The betsey best the easton. All hertzian things are not viewable. If something prevent the betsey and it is hertzian then it is articular. If something prevent the easton then the easton best the betsey. If something is nonchalant then it best the easton. If something is concessive then it does not eat the betsey. If something best the betsey then it is hertzian. The easton prevent the easton.", "logic": "\nnot Prevent(easton, betsey)\nPour(betsey, easton)\nPrevent(betsey, easton)\nHertzian(betsey)\nConcessive(betsey)\nArticular(betsey)\nBest(betsey, easton)\nforall x (Hertzian(x) -> not Viewable(x))\nforall x (Prevent(x, betsey) and Hertzian(x) -> Articular(x))\nforall x (Prevent(x, easton) -> Best(easton, betsey))\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) -> Best(x, easton))\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> not Prevent(x, betsey))\nforall x (Best(x, betsey) -> Hertzian(x))\n\nPrevent(easton, easton)\n\nPrevent(easton, easton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The ruthanne does not eat the annice. The annice conflict the ruthanne. The annice barde the ruthanne. The annice is unobvious. The annice is upward. The annice is logistic. The annice scratch the ruthanne. All unobvious things are not buttonlike. If something barde the annice and it is unobvious then it is logistic. If something barde the ruthanne then the ruthanne scratch the annice. If something is pyramidic then it scratch the ruthanne. If something is upward then it does not eat the annice. If something scratch the annice then it is unobvious. The ruthanne does not chase the ruthanne.", "logic": "\nnot Barde(ruthanne, annice)\nConflict(annice, ruthanne)\nBarde(annice, ruthanne)\nUnobvious(annice)\nUpward(annice)\nLogistic(annice)\nScratch(annice, ruthanne)\nforall x (Unobvious(x) -> not Buttonlike(x))\nforall x (Barde(x, annice) and Unobvious(x) -> Logistic(x))\nforall x (Barde(x, ruthanne) -> Scratch(ruthanne, annice))\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) -> Scratch(x, ruthanne))\nforall x (Upward(x) -> not Barde(x, annice))\nforall x (Scratch(x, annice) -> Unobvious(x))\n\nnot Conflict(ruthanne, ruthanne)\n\nnot Conflict(ruthanne, ruthanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The caterina does not eat the katha. The katha clatter the caterina. The katha tend the caterina. The katha is phonic. The katha is apogamic. The katha is polyphonic. The katha incinerate the caterina. All phonic things are not identical. If something tend the katha and it is phonic then it is polyphonic. If something tend the caterina then the caterina incinerate the katha. If something is discontent then it incinerate the caterina. If something is apogamic then it does not eat the katha. If something incinerate the katha then it is phonic. The katha incinerate the katha.", "logic": "\nnot Tend(caterina, katha)\nClatter(katha, caterina)\nTend(katha, caterina)\nPhonic(katha)\nApogamic(katha)\nPolyphonic(katha)\nIncinerate(katha, caterina)\nforall x (Phonic(x) -> not Identical(x))\nforall x (Tend(x, katha) and Phonic(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\nforall x (Tend(x, caterina) -> Incinerate(caterina, katha))\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Incinerate(x, caterina))\nforall x (Apogamic(x) -> not Tend(x, katha))\nforall x (Incinerate(x, katha) -> Phonic(x))\n\nIncinerate(katha, katha)\n\nIncinerate(katha, katha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The hermia does not eat the penelope. The penelope swatter the hermia. The penelope effervesce the hermia. The penelope is protected. The penelope is panicled. The penelope is choppy. The penelope trade the hermia. All protected things are not berrylike. If something effervesce the penelope and it is protected then it is choppy. If something effervesce the hermia then the hermia trade the penelope. If something is civic then it trade the hermia. If something is panicled then it does not eat the penelope. If something trade the penelope then it is protected. The hermia is not panicled.", "logic": "\nnot Effervesce(hermia, penelope)\nSwatter(penelope, hermia)\nEffervesce(penelope, hermia)\nProtected(penelope)\nPanicled(penelope)\nChoppy(penelope)\nTrade(penelope, hermia)\nforall x (Protected(x) -> not Berrylike(x))\nforall x (Effervesce(x, penelope) and Protected(x) -> Choppy(x))\nforall x (Effervesce(x, hermia) -> Trade(hermia, penelope))\nforall x (Civic(x) -> Trade(x, hermia))\nforall x (Panicled(x) -> not Effervesce(x, penelope))\nforall x (Trade(x, penelope) -> Protected(x))\n\nnot Panicled(hermia)\n\nnot Panicled(hermia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The vinny does not eat the carlota. The carlota stuff the vinny. The carlota unstrap the vinny. The carlota is interfaith. The carlota is nonchalant. The carlota is newsless. The carlota prompt the vinny. All interfaith things are not ablative. If something unstrap the carlota and it is interfaith then it is newsless. If something unstrap the vinny then the vinny prompt the carlota. If something is soundable then it prompt the vinny. If something is nonchalant then it does not eat the carlota. If something prompt the carlota then it is interfaith. The vinny stuff the carlota.", "logic": "\nnot Unstrap(vinny, carlota)\nStuff(carlota, vinny)\nUnstrap(carlota, vinny)\nInterfaith(carlota)\nNonchalant(carlota)\nNewsless(carlota)\nPrompt(carlota, vinny)\nforall x (Interfaith(x) -> not Ablative(x))\nforall x (Unstrap(x, carlota) and Interfaith(x) -> Newsless(x))\nforall x (Unstrap(x, vinny) -> Prompt(vinny, carlota))\nforall x (Soundable(x) -> Prompt(x, vinny))\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) -> not Unstrap(x, carlota))\nforall x (Prompt(x, carlota) -> Interfaith(x))\n\nStuff(vinny, carlota)\n\nStuff(vinny, carlota) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The huey is not polish. The huey assume the rourke. The huey wamble the rourke. The taylor is cuban. The taylor assume the huey. The taylor assume the stevana. The taylor wamble the huey. The taylor wamble the rourke. The taylor does not see the stevana. The taylor shmooze the huey. The taylor shmooze the rourke. The taylor shmooze the stevana. The rourke is polish. The rourke does not need the stevana. The rourke shmooze the huey. The stevana wamble the huey. If someone wamble the huey then they visit the taylor. If someone is polish then they see the rourke. If someone assume the rourke and they see the taylor then the rourke does not see the huey. If someone wamble the taylor and the taylor is polish then the taylor shmooze the rourke. If someone assume the rourke then the rourke is analogical. If someone wamble the rourke and the rourke wamble the stevana then the stevana assume the rourke. If the rourke wamble the stevana and the rourke is not duplicable then the rourke is not polish. If someone is analogical then they see the stevana. The taylor shmooze the stevana.", "logic": "\nnot Polish(huey)\nAssume(huey, rourke)\nWamble(huey, rourke)\nCuban(taylor)\nAssume(taylor, huey)\nAssume(taylor, stevana)\nWamble(taylor, huey)\nWamble(taylor, rourke)\nnot Wamble(taylor, stevana)\nShmooze(taylor, huey)\nShmooze(taylor, rourke)\nShmooze(taylor, stevana)\nPolish(rourke)\nnot Assume(rourke, stevana)\nShmooze(rourke, huey)\nWamble(stevana, huey)\nforall x (Wamble(x, huey) -> Shmooze(x, taylor))\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Wamble(x, rourke))\nforall x (Assume(x, rourke) and Wamble(x, taylor) -> not Wamble(rourke, huey))\nforall x (Wamble(x, taylor) and Polish(taylor) -> Shmooze(taylor, rourke))\nforall x (Assume(x, rourke) -> Analogical(rourke))\nforall x (Wamble(x, rourke) and Wamble(rourke, stevana) -> Assume(stevana, rourke))\nWamble(rourke, stevana) and not Duplicable(rourke) -> not Polish(rourke)\nforall x (Analogical(x) -> Wamble(x, stevana))\n\nShmooze(taylor, stevana)\n\ntherefore Shmooze(taylor, stevana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The cybil is not congested. The cybil jell the chantal. The cybil game the chantal. The tailor is sabine. The tailor jell the cybil. The tailor jell the enrika. The tailor game the cybil. The tailor game the chantal. The tailor does not see the enrika. The tailor enwrap the cybil. The tailor enwrap the chantal. The tailor enwrap the enrika. The chantal is congested. The chantal does not need the enrika. The chantal enwrap the cybil. The enrika game the cybil. If someone game the cybil then they visit the tailor. If someone is congested then they see the chantal. If someone jell the chantal and they see the tailor then the chantal does not see the cybil. If someone game the tailor and the tailor is congested then the tailor enwrap the chantal. If someone jell the chantal then the chantal is integral. If someone game the chantal and the chantal game the enrika then the enrika jell the chantal. If the chantal game the enrika and the chantal is not agonised then the chantal is not congested. If someone is integral then they see the enrika. The tailor does not visit the chantal.", "logic": "\nnot Congested(cybil)\nJell(cybil, chantal)\nGame(cybil, chantal)\nSabine(tailor)\nJell(tailor, cybil)\nJell(tailor, enrika)\nGame(tailor, cybil)\nGame(tailor, chantal)\nnot Game(tailor, enrika)\nEnwrap(tailor, cybil)\nEnwrap(tailor, chantal)\nEnwrap(tailor, enrika)\nCongested(chantal)\nnot Jell(chantal, enrika)\nEnwrap(chantal, cybil)\nGame(enrika, cybil)\nforall x (Game(x, cybil) -> Enwrap(x, tailor))\nforall x (Congested(x) -> Game(x, chantal))\nforall x (Jell(x, chantal) and Game(x, tailor) -> not Game(chantal, cybil))\nforall x (Game(x, tailor) and Congested(tailor) -> Enwrap(tailor, chantal))\nforall x (Jell(x, chantal) -> Integral(chantal))\nforall x (Game(x, chantal) and Game(chantal, enrika) -> Jell(enrika, chantal))\nGame(chantal, enrika) and not Agonised(chantal) -> not Congested(chantal)\nforall x (Integral(x) -> Game(x, enrika))\n\nnot Enwrap(tailor, chantal)\n\ntherefore Enwrap(tailor, chantal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The bill is not pimpled. The bill chemisorb the harmony. The bill senesce the harmony. The gilli is weakly. The gilli chemisorb the bill. The gilli chemisorb the onida. The gilli senesce the bill. The gilli senesce the harmony. The gilli does not see the onida. The gilli osculate the bill. The gilli osculate the harmony. The gilli osculate the onida. The harmony is pimpled. The harmony does not need the onida. The harmony osculate the bill. The onida senesce the bill. If someone senesce the bill then they visit the gilli. If someone is pimpled then they see the harmony. If someone chemisorb the harmony and they see the gilli then the harmony does not see the bill. If someone senesce the gilli and the gilli is pimpled then the gilli osculate the harmony. If someone chemisorb the harmony then the harmony is downy. If someone senesce the harmony and the harmony senesce the onida then the onida chemisorb the harmony. If the harmony senesce the onida and the harmony is not unbearable then the harmony is not pimpled. If someone is downy then they see the onida. The harmony is downy.", "logic": "\nnot Pimpled(bill)\nChemisorb(bill, harmony)\nSenesce(bill, harmony)\nWeakly(gilli)\nChemisorb(gilli, bill)\nChemisorb(gilli, onida)\nSenesce(gilli, bill)\nSenesce(gilli, harmony)\nnot Senesce(gilli, onida)\nOsculate(gilli, bill)\nOsculate(gilli, harmony)\nOsculate(gilli, onida)\nPimpled(harmony)\nnot Chemisorb(harmony, onida)\nOsculate(harmony, bill)\nSenesce(onida, bill)\nforall x (Senesce(x, bill) -> Osculate(x, gilli))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) -> Senesce(x, harmony))\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, harmony) and Senesce(x, gilli) -> not Senesce(harmony, bill))\nforall x (Senesce(x, gilli) and Pimpled(gilli) -> Osculate(gilli, harmony))\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, harmony) -> Downy(harmony))\nforall x (Senesce(x, harmony) and Senesce(harmony, onida) -> Chemisorb(onida, harmony))\nSenesce(harmony, onida) and not Unbearable(harmony) -> not Pimpled(harmony)\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Senesce(x, onida))\n\nDowny(harmony)\n\nChemisorb(bill, harmony) and forall x (Chemisorb(x, harmony) -> Downy(harmony)) -> therefore Downy(harmony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The carlyn is not placed. The carlyn socialize the ranna. The carlyn strand the ranna. The royce is cosmetic. The royce socialize the carlyn. The royce socialize the beverly. The royce strand the carlyn. The royce strand the ranna. The royce does not see the beverly. The royce sicken the carlyn. The royce sicken the ranna. The royce sicken the beverly. The ranna is placed. The ranna does not need the beverly. The ranna sicken the carlyn. The beverly strand the carlyn. If someone strand the carlyn then they visit the royce. If someone is placed then they see the ranna. If someone socialize the ranna and they see the royce then the ranna does not see the carlyn. If someone strand the royce and the royce is placed then the royce sicken the ranna. If someone socialize the ranna then the ranna is microsomal. If someone strand the ranna and the ranna strand the beverly then the beverly socialize the ranna. If the ranna strand the beverly and the ranna is not lumbering then the ranna is not placed. If someone is microsomal then they see the beverly. The beverly does not visit the royce.", "logic": "\nnot Placed(carlyn)\nSocialize(carlyn, ranna)\nStrand(carlyn, ranna)\nCosmetic(royce)\nSocialize(royce, carlyn)\nSocialize(royce, beverly)\nStrand(royce, carlyn)\nStrand(royce, ranna)\nnot Strand(royce, beverly)\nSicken(royce, carlyn)\nSicken(royce, ranna)\nSicken(royce, beverly)\nPlaced(ranna)\nnot Socialize(ranna, beverly)\nSicken(ranna, carlyn)\nStrand(beverly, carlyn)\nforall x (Strand(x, carlyn) -> Sicken(x, royce))\nforall x (Placed(x) -> Strand(x, ranna))\nforall x (Socialize(x, ranna) and Strand(x, royce) -> not Strand(ranna, carlyn))\nforall x (Strand(x, royce) and Placed(royce) -> Sicken(royce, ranna))\nforall x (Socialize(x, ranna) -> Microsomal(ranna))\nforall x (Strand(x, ranna) and Strand(ranna, beverly) -> Socialize(beverly, ranna))\nStrand(ranna, beverly) and not Lumbering(ranna) -> not Placed(ranna)\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Strand(x, beverly))\n\nnot Sicken(beverly, royce)\n\nStrand(beverly, carlyn) and forall x (Strand(x, carlyn) -> Sicken(x, royce)) -> therefore Sicken(beverly, royce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The quincey is not surreal. The quincey behold the robbi. The quincey snowball the robbi. The edy is hushed. The edy behold the quincey. The edy behold the phillipe. The edy snowball the quincey. The edy snowball the robbi. The edy does not see the phillipe. The edy coffin the quincey. The edy coffin the robbi. The edy coffin the phillipe. The robbi is surreal. The robbi does not need the phillipe. The robbi coffin the quincey. The phillipe snowball the quincey. If someone snowball the quincey then they visit the edy. If someone is surreal then they see the robbi. If someone behold the robbi and they see the edy then the robbi does not see the quincey. If someone snowball the edy and the edy is surreal then the edy coffin the robbi. If someone behold the robbi then the robbi is supreme. If someone snowball the robbi and the robbi snowball the phillipe then the phillipe behold the robbi. If the robbi snowball the phillipe and the robbi is not vegetative then the robbi is not surreal. If someone is supreme then they see the phillipe. The robbi snowball the phillipe.", "logic": "\nnot Surreal(quincey)\nBehold(quincey, robbi)\nSnowball(quincey, robbi)\nHushed(edy)\nBehold(edy, quincey)\nBehold(edy, phillipe)\nSnowball(edy, quincey)\nSnowball(edy, robbi)\nnot Snowball(edy, phillipe)\nCoffin(edy, quincey)\nCoffin(edy, robbi)\nCoffin(edy, phillipe)\nSurreal(robbi)\nnot Behold(robbi, phillipe)\nCoffin(robbi, quincey)\nSnowball(phillipe, quincey)\nforall x (Snowball(x, quincey) -> Coffin(x, edy))\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Snowball(x, robbi))\nforall x (Behold(x, robbi) and Snowball(x, edy) -> not Snowball(robbi, quincey))\nforall x (Snowball(x, edy) and Surreal(edy) -> Coffin(edy, robbi))\nforall x (Behold(x, robbi) -> Supreme(robbi))\nforall x (Snowball(x, robbi) and Snowball(robbi, phillipe) -> Behold(phillipe, robbi))\nSnowball(robbi, phillipe) and not Vegetative(robbi) -> not Surreal(robbi)\nforall x (Supreme(x) -> Snowball(x, phillipe))\n\nSnowball(robbi, phillipe)\n\nBehold(quincey, robbi) and forall x (Behold(x, robbi) -> Supreme(robbi)) -> therefore Supreme(robbi) Supreme(robbi) and forall x (Supreme(x) -> Snowball(x, phillipe)) -> therefore Snowball(robbi, phillipe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The terrence is not mullioned. The terrence spoon the berty. The terrence collide the berty. The glyn is informal. The glyn spoon the terrence. The glyn spoon the morna. The glyn collide the terrence. The glyn collide the berty. The glyn does not see the morna. The glyn well the terrence. The glyn well the berty. The glyn well the morna. The berty is mullioned. The berty does not need the morna. The berty well the terrence. The morna collide the terrence. If someone collide the terrence then they visit the glyn. If someone is mullioned then they see the berty. If someone spoon the berty and they see the glyn then the berty does not see the terrence. If someone collide the glyn and the glyn is mullioned then the glyn well the berty. If someone spoon the berty then the berty is prudential. If someone collide the berty and the berty collide the morna then the morna spoon the berty. If the berty collide the morna and the berty is not sabahan then the berty is not mullioned. If someone is prudential then they see the morna. The berty does not see the morna.", "logic": "\nnot Mullioned(terrence)\nSpoon(terrence, berty)\nCollide(terrence, berty)\nInformal(glyn)\nSpoon(glyn, terrence)\nSpoon(glyn, morna)\nCollide(glyn, terrence)\nCollide(glyn, berty)\nnot Collide(glyn, morna)\nWell(glyn, terrence)\nWell(glyn, berty)\nWell(glyn, morna)\nMullioned(berty)\nnot Spoon(berty, morna)\nWell(berty, terrence)\nCollide(morna, terrence)\nforall x (Collide(x, terrence) -> Well(x, glyn))\nforall x (Mullioned(x) -> Collide(x, berty))\nforall x (Spoon(x, berty) and Collide(x, glyn) -> not Collide(berty, terrence))\nforall x (Collide(x, glyn) and Mullioned(glyn) -> Well(glyn, berty))\nforall x (Spoon(x, berty) -> Prudential(berty))\nforall x (Collide(x, berty) and Collide(berty, morna) -> Spoon(morna, berty))\nCollide(berty, morna) and not Sabahan(berty) -> not Mullioned(berty)\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> Collide(x, morna))\n\nnot Collide(berty, morna)\n\nSpoon(terrence, berty) and forall x (Spoon(x, berty) -> Prudential(berty)) -> therefore Prudential(berty) Prudential(berty) and forall x (Prudential(x) -> Collide(x, morna)) -> therefore Collide(berty, morna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The dolora is not askew. The dolora clamor the elvis. The dolora vaticinate the elvis. The cliff is biologic. The cliff clamor the dolora. The cliff clamor the avril. The cliff vaticinate the dolora. The cliff vaticinate the elvis. The cliff does not see the avril. The cliff freewheel the dolora. The cliff freewheel the elvis. The cliff freewheel the avril. The elvis is askew. The elvis does not need the avril. The elvis freewheel the dolora. The avril vaticinate the dolora. If someone vaticinate the dolora then they visit the cliff. If someone is askew then they see the elvis. If someone clamor the elvis and they see the cliff then the elvis does not see the dolora. If someone vaticinate the cliff and the cliff is askew then the cliff freewheel the elvis. If someone clamor the elvis then the elvis is tripartite. If someone vaticinate the elvis and the elvis vaticinate the avril then the avril clamor the elvis. If the elvis vaticinate the avril and the elvis is not guiding then the elvis is not askew. If someone is tripartite then they see the avril. The avril clamor the elvis.", "logic": "\nnot Askew(dolora)\nClamor(dolora, elvis)\nVaticinate(dolora, elvis)\nBiologic(cliff)\nClamor(cliff, dolora)\nClamor(cliff, avril)\nVaticinate(cliff, dolora)\nVaticinate(cliff, elvis)\nnot Vaticinate(cliff, avril)\nFreewheel(cliff, dolora)\nFreewheel(cliff, elvis)\nFreewheel(cliff, avril)\nAskew(elvis)\nnot Clamor(elvis, avril)\nFreewheel(elvis, dolora)\nVaticinate(avril, dolora)\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, dolora) -> Freewheel(x, cliff))\nforall x (Askew(x) -> Vaticinate(x, elvis))\nforall x (Clamor(x, elvis) and Vaticinate(x, cliff) -> not Vaticinate(elvis, dolora))\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, cliff) and Askew(cliff) -> Freewheel(cliff, elvis))\nforall x (Clamor(x, elvis) -> Tripartite(elvis))\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, elvis) and Vaticinate(elvis, avril) -> Clamor(avril, elvis))\nVaticinate(elvis, avril) and not Guiding(elvis) -> not Askew(elvis)\nforall x (Tripartite(x) -> Vaticinate(x, avril))\n\nClamor(avril, elvis)\n\nClamor(dolora, elvis) and forall x (Clamor(x, elvis) -> Tripartite(elvis)) -> therefore Tripartite(elvis) Tripartite(elvis) and forall x (Tripartite(x) -> Vaticinate(x, avril)) -> therefore Vaticinate(elvis, avril) Vaticinate(dolora, elvis) and Vaticinate(elvis, avril) and forall x (Vaticinate(x, elvis) and Vaticinate(elvis, avril) -> Clamor(avril, elvis)) -> therefore Clamor(avril, elvis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The vonni is not northmost. The vonni body the dyna. The vonni fraternise the dyna. The leeanne is frizzy. The leeanne body the vonni. The leeanne body the gabriella. The leeanne fraternise the vonni. The leeanne fraternise the dyna. The leeanne does not see the gabriella. The leeanne strut the vonni. The leeanne strut the dyna. The leeanne strut the gabriella. The dyna is northmost. The dyna does not need the gabriella. The dyna strut the vonni. The gabriella fraternise the vonni. If someone fraternise the vonni then they visit the leeanne. If someone is northmost then they see the dyna. If someone body the dyna and they see the leeanne then the dyna does not see the vonni. If someone fraternise the leeanne and the leeanne is northmost then the leeanne strut the dyna. If someone body the dyna then the dyna is capitular. If someone fraternise the dyna and the dyna fraternise the gabriella then the gabriella body the dyna. If the dyna fraternise the gabriella and the dyna is not fourteenth then the dyna is not northmost. If someone is capitular then they see the gabriella. The gabriella does not need the dyna.", "logic": "\nnot Northmost(vonni)\nBody(vonni, dyna)\nFraternise(vonni, dyna)\nFrizzy(leeanne)\nBody(leeanne, vonni)\nBody(leeanne, gabriella)\nFraternise(leeanne, vonni)\nFraternise(leeanne, dyna)\nnot Fraternise(leeanne, gabriella)\nStrut(leeanne, vonni)\nStrut(leeanne, dyna)\nStrut(leeanne, gabriella)\nNorthmost(dyna)\nnot Body(dyna, gabriella)\nStrut(dyna, vonni)\nFraternise(gabriella, vonni)\nforall x (Fraternise(x, vonni) -> Strut(x, leeanne))\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Fraternise(x, dyna))\nforall x (Body(x, dyna) and Fraternise(x, leeanne) -> not Fraternise(dyna, vonni))\nforall x (Fraternise(x, leeanne) and Northmost(leeanne) -> Strut(leeanne, dyna))\nforall x (Body(x, dyna) -> Capitular(dyna))\nforall x (Fraternise(x, dyna) and Fraternise(dyna, gabriella) -> Body(gabriella, dyna))\nFraternise(dyna, gabriella) and not Fourteenth(dyna) -> not Northmost(dyna)\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> Fraternise(x, gabriella))\n\nnot Body(gabriella, dyna)\n\nBody(vonni, dyna) and forall x (Body(x, dyna) -> Capitular(dyna)) -> therefore Capitular(dyna) Capitular(dyna) and forall x (Capitular(x) -> Fraternise(x, gabriella)) -> therefore Fraternise(dyna, gabriella) Fraternise(vonni, dyna) and Fraternise(dyna, gabriella) and forall x (Fraternise(x, dyna) and Fraternise(dyna, gabriella) -> Body(gabriella, dyna)) -> therefore Body(gabriella, dyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The antony is not endemical. The antony fondle the marian. The antony fricassee the marian. The blinni is sensed. The blinni fondle the antony. The blinni fondle the genovera. The blinni fricassee the antony. The blinni fricassee the marian. The blinni does not see the genovera. The blinni refill the antony. The blinni refill the marian. The blinni refill the genovera. The marian is endemical. The marian does not need the genovera. The marian refill the antony. The genovera fricassee the antony. If someone fricassee the antony then they visit the blinni. If someone is endemical then they see the marian. If someone fondle the marian and they see the blinni then the marian does not see the antony. If someone fricassee the blinni and the blinni is endemical then the blinni refill the marian. If someone fondle the marian then the marian is possessed. If someone fricassee the marian and the marian fricassee the genovera then the genovera fondle the marian. If the marian fricassee the genovera and the marian is not aperient then the marian is not endemical. If someone is possessed then they see the genovera. The marian does not visit the blinni.", "logic": "\nnot Endemical(antony)\nFondle(antony, marian)\nFricassee(antony, marian)\nSensed(blinni)\nFondle(blinni, antony)\nFondle(blinni, genovera)\nFricassee(blinni, antony)\nFricassee(blinni, marian)\nnot Fricassee(blinni, genovera)\nRefill(blinni, antony)\nRefill(blinni, marian)\nRefill(blinni, genovera)\nEndemical(marian)\nnot Fondle(marian, genovera)\nRefill(marian, antony)\nFricassee(genovera, antony)\nforall x (Fricassee(x, antony) -> Refill(x, blinni))\nforall x (Endemical(x) -> Fricassee(x, marian))\nforall x (Fondle(x, marian) and Fricassee(x, blinni) -> not Fricassee(marian, antony))\nforall x (Fricassee(x, blinni) and Endemical(blinni) -> Refill(blinni, marian))\nforall x (Fondle(x, marian) -> Possessed(marian))\nforall x (Fricassee(x, marian) and Fricassee(marian, genovera) -> Fondle(genovera, marian))\nFricassee(marian, genovera) and not Aperient(marian) -> not Endemical(marian)\nforall x (Possessed(x) -> Fricassee(x, genovera))\n\nnot Refill(marian, blinni)\n\nforall x (Fricassee(x, antony) -> Refill(x, blinni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The agnese is not yawning. The agnese guggle the ramonda. The agnese sauce the ramonda. The menard is ergonomic. The menard guggle the agnese. The menard guggle the huey. The menard sauce the agnese. The menard sauce the ramonda. The menard does not see the huey. The menard heave the agnese. The menard heave the ramonda. The menard heave the huey. The ramonda is yawning. The ramonda does not need the huey. The ramonda heave the agnese. The huey sauce the agnese. If someone sauce the agnese then they visit the menard. If someone is yawning then they see the ramonda. If someone guggle the ramonda and they see the menard then the ramonda does not see the agnese. If someone sauce the menard and the menard is yawning then the menard heave the ramonda. If someone guggle the ramonda then the ramonda is bantering. If someone sauce the ramonda and the ramonda sauce the huey then the huey guggle the ramonda. If the ramonda sauce the huey and the ramonda is not cyan then the ramonda is not yawning. If someone is bantering then they see the huey. The huey sauce the ramonda.", "logic": "\nnot Yawning(agnese)\nGuggle(agnese, ramonda)\nSauce(agnese, ramonda)\nErgonomic(menard)\nGuggle(menard, agnese)\nGuggle(menard, huey)\nSauce(menard, agnese)\nSauce(menard, ramonda)\nnot Sauce(menard, huey)\nHeave(menard, agnese)\nHeave(menard, ramonda)\nHeave(menard, huey)\nYawning(ramonda)\nnot Guggle(ramonda, huey)\nHeave(ramonda, agnese)\nSauce(huey, agnese)\nforall x (Sauce(x, agnese) -> Heave(x, menard))\nforall x (Yawning(x) -> Sauce(x, ramonda))\nforall x (Guggle(x, ramonda) and Sauce(x, menard) -> not Sauce(ramonda, agnese))\nforall x (Sauce(x, menard) and Yawning(menard) -> Heave(menard, ramonda))\nforall x (Guggle(x, ramonda) -> Bantering(ramonda))\nforall x (Sauce(x, ramonda) and Sauce(ramonda, huey) -> Guggle(huey, ramonda))\nSauce(ramonda, huey) and not Cyan(ramonda) -> not Yawning(ramonda)\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Sauce(x, huey))\n\nSauce(huey, ramonda)\n\nforall x (Yawning(x) -> Sauce(x, ramonda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The netta is not temporal. The netta notarise the che. The netta flinch the che. The oswell is wavering. The oswell notarise the netta. The oswell notarise the doti. The oswell flinch the netta. The oswell flinch the che. The oswell does not see the doti. The oswell tailor the netta. The oswell tailor the che. The oswell tailor the doti. The che is temporal. The che does not need the doti. The che tailor the netta. The doti flinch the netta. If someone flinch the netta then they visit the oswell. If someone is temporal then they see the che. If someone notarise the che and they see the oswell then the che does not see the netta. If someone flinch the oswell and the oswell is temporal then the oswell tailor the che. If someone notarise the che then the che is neuromotor. If someone flinch the che and the che flinch the doti then the doti notarise the che. If the che flinch the doti and the che is not educated then the che is not temporal. If someone is neuromotor then they see the doti. The netta does not see the doti.", "logic": "\nnot Temporal(netta)\nNotarise(netta, che)\nFlinch(netta, che)\nWavering(oswell)\nNotarise(oswell, netta)\nNotarise(oswell, doti)\nFlinch(oswell, netta)\nFlinch(oswell, che)\nnot Flinch(oswell, doti)\nTailor(oswell, netta)\nTailor(oswell, che)\nTailor(oswell, doti)\nTemporal(che)\nnot Notarise(che, doti)\nTailor(che, netta)\nFlinch(doti, netta)\nforall x (Flinch(x, netta) -> Tailor(x, oswell))\nforall x (Temporal(x) -> Flinch(x, che))\nforall x (Notarise(x, che) and Flinch(x, oswell) -> not Flinch(che, netta))\nforall x (Flinch(x, oswell) and Temporal(oswell) -> Tailor(oswell, che))\nforall x (Notarise(x, che) -> Neuromotor(che))\nforall x (Flinch(x, che) and Flinch(che, doti) -> Notarise(doti, che))\nFlinch(che, doti) and not Educated(che) -> not Temporal(che)\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) -> Flinch(x, doti))\n\nnot Flinch(netta, doti)\n\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) -> Flinch(x, doti)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The cris is not adust. The cris lowball the hilbert. The cris reinvent the hilbert. The briana is creaseless. The briana lowball the cris. The briana lowball the sisile. The briana reinvent the cris. The briana reinvent the hilbert. The briana does not see the sisile. The briana outbid the cris. The briana outbid the hilbert. The briana outbid the sisile. The hilbert is adust. The hilbert does not need the sisile. The hilbert outbid the cris. The sisile reinvent the cris. If someone reinvent the cris then they visit the briana. If someone is adust then they see the hilbert. If someone lowball the hilbert and they see the briana then the hilbert does not see the cris. If someone reinvent the briana and the briana is adust then the briana outbid the hilbert. If someone lowball the hilbert then the hilbert is obligate. If someone reinvent the hilbert and the hilbert reinvent the sisile then the sisile lowball the hilbert. If the hilbert reinvent the sisile and the hilbert is not nineteen then the hilbert is not adust. If someone is obligate then they see the sisile. The sisile reinvent the sisile.", "logic": "\nnot Adust(cris)\nLowball(cris, hilbert)\nReinvent(cris, hilbert)\nCreaseless(briana)\nLowball(briana, cris)\nLowball(briana, sisile)\nReinvent(briana, cris)\nReinvent(briana, hilbert)\nnot Reinvent(briana, sisile)\nOutbid(briana, cris)\nOutbid(briana, hilbert)\nOutbid(briana, sisile)\nAdust(hilbert)\nnot Lowball(hilbert, sisile)\nOutbid(hilbert, cris)\nReinvent(sisile, cris)\nforall x (Reinvent(x, cris) -> Outbid(x, briana))\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Reinvent(x, hilbert))\nforall x (Lowball(x, hilbert) and Reinvent(x, briana) -> not Reinvent(hilbert, cris))\nforall x (Reinvent(x, briana) and Adust(briana) -> Outbid(briana, hilbert))\nforall x (Lowball(x, hilbert) -> Obligate(hilbert))\nforall x (Reinvent(x, hilbert) and Reinvent(hilbert, sisile) -> Lowball(sisile, hilbert))\nReinvent(hilbert, sisile) and not Nineteen(hilbert) -> not Adust(hilbert)\nforall x (Obligate(x) -> Reinvent(x, sisile))\n\nReinvent(sisile, sisile)\n\nforall x (Obligate(x) -> Reinvent(x, sisile)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The roberta is not sinistral. The roberta cannonade the beatrix. The roberta originate the beatrix. The mohamad is preferred. The mohamad cannonade the roberta. The mohamad cannonade the loretta. The mohamad originate the roberta. The mohamad originate the beatrix. The mohamad does not see the loretta. The mohamad acclaim the roberta. The mohamad acclaim the beatrix. The mohamad acclaim the loretta. The beatrix is sinistral. The beatrix does not need the loretta. The beatrix acclaim the roberta. The loretta originate the roberta. If someone originate the roberta then they visit the mohamad. If someone is sinistral then they see the beatrix. If someone cannonade the beatrix and they see the mohamad then the beatrix does not see the roberta. If someone originate the mohamad and the mohamad is sinistral then the mohamad acclaim the beatrix. If someone cannonade the beatrix then the beatrix is leaflike. If someone originate the beatrix and the beatrix originate the loretta then the loretta cannonade the beatrix. If the beatrix originate the loretta and the beatrix is not calyceal then the beatrix is not sinistral. If someone is leaflike then they see the loretta. The roberta is not preferred.", "logic": "\nnot Sinistral(roberta)\nCannonade(roberta, beatrix)\nOriginate(roberta, beatrix)\nPreferred(mohamad)\nCannonade(mohamad, roberta)\nCannonade(mohamad, loretta)\nOriginate(mohamad, roberta)\nOriginate(mohamad, beatrix)\nnot Originate(mohamad, loretta)\nAcclaim(mohamad, roberta)\nAcclaim(mohamad, beatrix)\nAcclaim(mohamad, loretta)\nSinistral(beatrix)\nnot Cannonade(beatrix, loretta)\nAcclaim(beatrix, roberta)\nOriginate(loretta, roberta)\nforall x (Originate(x, roberta) -> Acclaim(x, mohamad))\nforall x (Sinistral(x) -> Originate(x, beatrix))\nforall x (Cannonade(x, beatrix) and Originate(x, mohamad) -> not Originate(beatrix, roberta))\nforall x (Originate(x, mohamad) and Sinistral(mohamad) -> Acclaim(mohamad, beatrix))\nforall x (Cannonade(x, beatrix) -> Leaflike(beatrix))\nforall x (Originate(x, beatrix) and Originate(beatrix, loretta) -> Cannonade(loretta, beatrix))\nOriginate(beatrix, loretta) and not Calyceal(beatrix) -> not Sinistral(beatrix)\nforall x (Leaflike(x) -> Originate(x, loretta))\n\nnot Preferred(roberta)\n\nnot Preferred(roberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The maisie is not public. The maisie tube the jami. The maisie coiffe the jami. The lovell is unripe. The lovell tube the maisie. The lovell tube the rochell. The lovell coiffe the maisie. The lovell coiffe the jami. The lovell does not see the rochell. The lovell hiss the maisie. The lovell hiss the jami. The lovell hiss the rochell. The jami is public. The jami does not need the rochell. The jami hiss the maisie. The rochell coiffe the maisie. If someone coiffe the maisie then they visit the lovell. If someone is public then they see the jami. If someone tube the jami and they see the lovell then the jami does not see the maisie. If someone coiffe the lovell and the lovell is public then the lovell hiss the jami. If someone tube the jami then the jami is getable. If someone coiffe the jami and the jami coiffe the rochell then the rochell tube the jami. If the jami coiffe the rochell and the jami is not clubfooted then the jami is not public. If someone is getable then they see the rochell. The maisie coiffe the lovell.", "logic": "\nnot Public(maisie)\nTube(maisie, jami)\nCoiffe(maisie, jami)\nUnripe(lovell)\nTube(lovell, maisie)\nTube(lovell, rochell)\nCoiffe(lovell, maisie)\nCoiffe(lovell, jami)\nnot Coiffe(lovell, rochell)\nHiss(lovell, maisie)\nHiss(lovell, jami)\nHiss(lovell, rochell)\nPublic(jami)\nnot Tube(jami, rochell)\nHiss(jami, maisie)\nCoiffe(rochell, maisie)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, maisie) -> Hiss(x, lovell))\nforall x (Public(x) -> Coiffe(x, jami))\nforall x (Tube(x, jami) and Coiffe(x, lovell) -> not Coiffe(jami, maisie))\nforall x (Coiffe(x, lovell) and Public(lovell) -> Hiss(lovell, jami))\nforall x (Tube(x, jami) -> Getable(jami))\nforall x (Coiffe(x, jami) and Coiffe(jami, rochell) -> Tube(rochell, jami))\nCoiffe(jami, rochell) and not Clubfooted(jami) -> not Public(jami)\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Coiffe(x, rochell))\n\nCoiffe(maisie, lovell)\n\nCoiffe(maisie, lovell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The esme is not noncaloric. The esme spatter the riane. The esme loan the riane. The terence is multiplied. The terence spatter the esme. The terence spatter the scarlett. The terence loan the esme. The terence loan the riane. The terence does not see the scarlett. The terence intrigue the esme. The terence intrigue the riane. The terence intrigue the scarlett. The riane is noncaloric. The riane does not need the scarlett. The riane intrigue the esme. The scarlett loan the esme. If someone loan the esme then they visit the terence. If someone is noncaloric then they see the riane. If someone spatter the riane and they see the terence then the riane does not see the esme. If someone loan the terence and the terence is noncaloric then the terence intrigue the riane. If someone spatter the riane then the riane is blubbery. If someone loan the riane and the riane loan the scarlett then the scarlett spatter the riane. If the riane loan the scarlett and the riane is not koranic then the riane is not noncaloric. If someone is blubbery then they see the scarlett. The scarlett is not multiplied.", "logic": "\nnot Noncaloric(esme)\nSpatter(esme, riane)\nLoan(esme, riane)\nMultiplied(terence)\nSpatter(terence, esme)\nSpatter(terence, scarlett)\nLoan(terence, esme)\nLoan(terence, riane)\nnot Loan(terence, scarlett)\nIntrigue(terence, esme)\nIntrigue(terence, riane)\nIntrigue(terence, scarlett)\nNoncaloric(riane)\nnot Spatter(riane, scarlett)\nIntrigue(riane, esme)\nLoan(scarlett, esme)\nforall x (Loan(x, esme) -> Intrigue(x, terence))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Loan(x, riane))\nforall x (Spatter(x, riane) and Loan(x, terence) -> not Loan(riane, esme))\nforall x (Loan(x, terence) and Noncaloric(terence) -> Intrigue(terence, riane))\nforall x (Spatter(x, riane) -> Blubbery(riane))\nforall x (Loan(x, riane) and Loan(riane, scarlett) -> Spatter(scarlett, riane))\nLoan(riane, scarlett) and not Koranic(riane) -> not Noncaloric(riane)\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Loan(x, scarlett))\n\nnot Multiplied(scarlett)\n\nnot Multiplied(scarlett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The hortense is not abranchial. The hortense aquaplane the junette. The hortense torch the junette. The anatole is minuscular. The anatole aquaplane the hortense. The anatole aquaplane the caril. The anatole torch the hortense. The anatole torch the junette. The anatole does not see the caril. The anatole reave the hortense. The anatole reave the junette. The anatole reave the caril. The junette is abranchial. The junette does not need the caril. The junette reave the hortense. The caril torch the hortense. If someone torch the hortense then they visit the anatole. If someone is abranchial then they see the junette. If someone aquaplane the junette and they see the anatole then the junette does not see the hortense. If someone torch the anatole and the anatole is abranchial then the anatole reave the junette. If someone aquaplane the junette then the junette is balsamic. If someone torch the junette and the junette torch the caril then the caril aquaplane the junette. If the junette torch the caril and the junette is not distorted then the junette is not abranchial. If someone is balsamic then they see the caril. The caril torch the anatole.", "logic": "\nnot Abranchial(hortense)\nAquaplane(hortense, junette)\nTorch(hortense, junette)\nMinuscular(anatole)\nAquaplane(anatole, hortense)\nAquaplane(anatole, caril)\nTorch(anatole, hortense)\nTorch(anatole, junette)\nnot Torch(anatole, caril)\nReave(anatole, hortense)\nReave(anatole, junette)\nReave(anatole, caril)\nAbranchial(junette)\nnot Aquaplane(junette, caril)\nReave(junette, hortense)\nTorch(caril, hortense)\nforall x (Torch(x, hortense) -> Reave(x, anatole))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) -> Torch(x, junette))\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, junette) and Torch(x, anatole) -> not Torch(junette, hortense))\nforall x (Torch(x, anatole) and Abranchial(anatole) -> Reave(anatole, junette))\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, junette) -> Balsamic(junette))\nforall x (Torch(x, junette) and Torch(junette, caril) -> Aquaplane(caril, junette))\nTorch(junette, caril) and not Distorted(junette) -> not Abranchial(junette)\nforall x (Balsamic(x) -> Torch(x, caril))\n\nTorch(caril, anatole)\n\nTorch(caril, anatole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Annette is squalling. Katlin is scrubbed. If someone is squalling then they are unsweet. Young people are incurious. Big people are inadequate. If Katlin is incurious then Katlin is unsweet. All scrubbed people are incurious. All unsweet people are incurious. All unsweet, scrubbed people are lowbrowed. Big, scrubbed people are unsweet. Katlin is scrubbed.", "logic": "\nSqualling(annette)\nScrubbed(katlin)\nforall x (Squalling(x) -> Unsweet(x))\nforall x (Inadequate(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Squalling(x) -> Inadequate(x))\nIncurious(katlin) -> Unsweet(katlin)\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Unsweet(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Unsweet(x) and Scrubbed(x) -> Lowbrowed(x))\nforall x (Squalling(x) and Scrubbed(x) -> Unsweet(x))\n\nScrubbed(katlin)\n\ntherefore Scrubbed(katlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Nelli is gonzo. Annaliese is nonlexical. If someone is gonzo then they are monoclonal. Young people are gluteal. Big people are acuate. If Annaliese is gluteal then Annaliese is monoclonal. All nonlexical people are gluteal. All monoclonal people are gluteal. All monoclonal, nonlexical people are navicular. Big, nonlexical people are monoclonal. Nelli is not gonzo.", "logic": "\nGonzo(nelli)\nNonlexical(annaliese)\nforall x (Gonzo(x) -> Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Acuate(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) -> Acuate(x))\nGluteal(annaliese) -> Monoclonal(annaliese)\nforall x (Nonlexical(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and Nonlexical(x) -> Navicular(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) and Nonlexical(x) -> Monoclonal(x))\n\nnot Gonzo(nelli)\n\ntherefore Gonzo(nelli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Leoine is submissive. Calypso is unsaleable. If someone is submissive then they are jeweled. Young people are armillary. Big people are zestful. If Calypso is armillary then Calypso is jeweled. All unsaleable people are armillary. All jeweled people are armillary. All jeweled, unsaleable people are beaming. Big, unsaleable people are jeweled. Leoine is zestful.", "logic": "\nSubmissive(leoine)\nUnsaleable(calypso)\nforall x (Submissive(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Armillary(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) -> Zestful(x))\nArmillary(calypso) -> Jeweled(calypso)\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Armillary(x))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) -> Armillary(x))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and Unsaleable(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Unsaleable(x) -> Jeweled(x))\n\nZestful(leoine)\n\nSubmissive(leoine) and forall x (Submissive(x) -> Zestful(x)) -> therefore Zestful(leoine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Alexine is hydrated. Karna is umptieth. If someone is hydrated then they are unreported. Young people are belemnitic. Big people are delusional. If Karna is belemnitic then Karna is unreported. All umptieth people are belemnitic. All unreported people are belemnitic. All unreported, umptieth people are incestuous. Big, umptieth people are unreported. Alexine is not delusional.", "logic": "\nHydrated(alexine)\nUmptieth(karna)\nforall x (Hydrated(x) -> Unreported(x))\nforall x (Delusional(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\nforall x (Hydrated(x) -> Delusional(x))\nBelemnitic(karna) -> Unreported(karna)\nforall x (Umptieth(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\nforall x (Unreported(x) and Umptieth(x) -> Incestuous(x))\nforall x (Hydrated(x) and Umptieth(x) -> Unreported(x))\n\nnot Delusional(alexine)\n\nHydrated(alexine) and forall x (Hydrated(x) -> Delusional(x)) -> therefore Delusional(alexine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Ivonne is illiterate. Correy is manic. If someone is illiterate then they are tinselly. Young people are unstuck. Big people are uncounted. If Correy is unstuck then Correy is tinselly. All manic people are unstuck. All tinselly people are unstuck. All tinselly, manic people are disastrous. Big, manic people are tinselly. Ivonne is unstuck.", "logic": "\nIlliterate(ivonne)\nManic(correy)\nforall x (Illiterate(x) -> Tinselly(x))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Unstuck(x))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) -> Uncounted(x))\nUnstuck(correy) -> Tinselly(correy)\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Unstuck(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Unstuck(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) and Manic(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) and Manic(x) -> Tinselly(x))\n\nUnstuck(ivonne)\n\nIlliterate(ivonne) and forall x (Illiterate(x) -> Tinselly(x)) -> therefore Tinselly(ivonne) Tinselly(ivonne) and forall x (Tinselly(x) -> Unstuck(x)) -> therefore Unstuck(ivonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Joachim is aquiline. Quintina is voidable. If someone is aquiline then they are gimpy. Young people are illusional. Big people are unfree. If Quintina is illusional then Quintina is gimpy. All voidable people are illusional. All gimpy people are illusional. All gimpy, voidable people are mythologic. Big, voidable people are gimpy. Quintina is not gimpy.", "logic": "\nAquiline(joachim)\nVoidable(quintina)\nforall x (Aquiline(x) -> Gimpy(x))\nforall x (Unfree(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) -> Unfree(x))\nIllusional(quintina) -> Gimpy(quintina)\nforall x (Voidable(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Gimpy(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Gimpy(x) and Voidable(x) -> Mythologic(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Voidable(x) -> Gimpy(x))\n\nnot Gimpy(quintina)\n\nVoidable(quintina) and forall x (Voidable(x) -> Illusional(x)) -> therefore Illusional(quintina) Illusional(quintina) and Illusional(quintina) -> Gimpy(quintina) -> therefore Gimpy(quintina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Arly is incurious. Rahul is hypnotized. If someone is incurious then they are chartless. Young people are dashing. Big people are blindfold. If Rahul is dashing then Rahul is chartless. All hypnotized people are dashing. All chartless people are dashing. All chartless, hypnotized people are cobwebby. Big, hypnotized people are chartless. Rahul is cobwebby.", "logic": "\nIncurious(arly)\nHypnotized(rahul)\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Chartless(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Blindfold(x))\nDashing(rahul) -> Chartless(rahul)\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Chartless(x) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Chartless(x) and Hypnotized(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) and Hypnotized(x) -> Chartless(x))\n\nCobwebby(rahul)\n\nHypnotized(rahul) and forall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Dashing(x)) -> therefore Dashing(rahul) Dashing(rahul) and Dashing(rahul) -> Chartless(rahul) -> therefore Chartless(rahul) Chartless(rahul) and Hypnotized(rahul) and forall x (Chartless(x) and Hypnotized(x) -> Cobwebby(x)) -> therefore Cobwebby(rahul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Matteo is paperback. Rosario is permeative. If someone is paperback then they are airlike. Young people are purging. Big people are unilateral. If Rosario is purging then Rosario is airlike. All permeative people are purging. All airlike people are purging. All airlike, permeative people are immoderate. Big, permeative people are airlike. Rosario is not immoderate.", "logic": "\nPaperback(matteo)\nPermeative(rosario)\nforall x (Paperback(x) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Unilateral(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Paperback(x) -> Unilateral(x))\nPurging(rosario) -> Airlike(rosario)\nforall x (Permeative(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Airlike(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Airlike(x) and Permeative(x) -> Immoderate(x))\nforall x (Paperback(x) and Permeative(x) -> Airlike(x))\n\nnot Immoderate(rosario)\n\nPermeative(rosario) and forall x (Permeative(x) -> Purging(x)) -> therefore Purging(rosario) Purging(rosario) and Purging(rosario) -> Airlike(rosario) -> therefore Airlike(rosario) Airlike(rosario) and Permeative(rosario) and forall x (Airlike(x) and Permeative(x) -> Immoderate(x)) -> therefore Immoderate(rosario)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Ignacius is addictive. Devi is spoiled. If someone is addictive then they are educated. Young people are guinean. Big people are promissory. If Devi is guinean then Devi is educated. All spoiled people are guinean. All educated people are guinean. All educated, spoiled people are correct. Big, spoiled people are educated. Ignacius is not correct.", "logic": "\nAddictive(ignacius)\nSpoiled(devi)\nforall x (Addictive(x) -> Educated(x))\nforall x (Promissory(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Addictive(x) -> Promissory(x))\nGuinean(devi) -> Educated(devi)\nforall x (Spoiled(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Educated(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Educated(x) and Spoiled(x) -> Correct(x))\nforall x (Addictive(x) and Spoiled(x) -> Educated(x))\n\nnot Correct(ignacius)\n\nforall x (Educated(x) and Spoiled(x) -> Correct(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Margy is validating. Blithe is bellbottom. If someone is validating then they are cloddish. Young people are spirituous. Big people are julian. If Blithe is spirituous then Blithe is cloddish. All bellbottom people are spirituous. All cloddish people are spirituous. All cloddish, bellbottom people are unselfish. Big, bellbottom people are cloddish. Blithe is julian.", "logic": "\nValidating(margy)\nBellbottom(blithe)\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Cloddish(x))\nforall x (Julian(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Julian(x))\nSpirituous(blithe) -> Cloddish(blithe)\nforall x (Bellbottom(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) and Bellbottom(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) and Bellbottom(x) -> Cloddish(x))\n\nJulian(blithe)\n\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Julian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Bengt is fallible. Fleming is prepared. If someone is fallible then they are lxxvi. Young people are uncaused. Big people are acquirable. If Fleming is uncaused then Fleming is lxxvi. All prepared people are uncaused. All lxxvi people are uncaused. All lxxvi, prepared people are rhinal. Big, prepared people are lxxvi. Fleming is not fallible.", "logic": "\nFallible(bengt)\nPrepared(fleming)\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> Acquirable(x))\nUncaused(fleming) -> Lxxvi(fleming)\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) and Prepared(x) -> Rhinal(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Prepared(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\n\nnot Fallible(fleming)\n\nnot Fallible(fleming) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Jacquetta is centrical. Derrick is wintry. If someone is centrical then they are zionist. Young people are reflexed. Big people are flushed. If Derrick is reflexed then Derrick is zionist. All wintry people are reflexed. All zionist people are reflexed. All zionist, wintry people are erasable. Big, wintry people are zionist. Derrick is nice.", "logic": "\nCentrical(jacquetta)\nWintry(derrick)\nforall x (Centrical(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Flushed(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nforall x (Centrical(x) -> Flushed(x))\nReflexed(derrick) -> Zionist(derrick)\nforall x (Wintry(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) and Wintry(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Centrical(x) and Wintry(x) -> Zionist(x))\n\nNice(derrick)\n\nNice(derrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Robby is fivefold. Lorinda is screwball. If someone is fivefold then they are peculiar. Young people are fibrillose. Big people are less. If Lorinda is fibrillose then Lorinda is peculiar. All screwball people are fibrillose. All peculiar people are fibrillose. All peculiar, screwball people are organismal. Big, screwball people are peculiar. Robby is not screwball.", "logic": "\nFivefold(robby)\nScrewball(lorinda)\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Peculiar(x))\nforall x (Less(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Less(x))\nFibrillose(lorinda) -> Peculiar(lorinda)\nforall x (Screwball(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) and Screwball(x) -> Organismal(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) and Screwball(x) -> Peculiar(x))\n\nnot Screwball(robby)\n\nnot Screwball(robby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Kayla is soppy. Niki is boxy. If someone is soppy then they are getable. Young people are sedentary. Big people are winglike. If Niki is sedentary then Niki is getable. All boxy people are sedentary. All getable people are sedentary. All getable, boxy people are endogenous. Big, boxy people are getable. Kayla is nice.", "logic": "\nSoppy(kayla)\nBoxy(niki)\nforall x (Soppy(x) -> Getable(x))\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Soppy(x) -> Winglike(x))\nSedentary(niki) -> Getable(niki)\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) and Boxy(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Soppy(x) and Boxy(x) -> Getable(x))\n\nNice(kayla)\n\nNice(kayla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "The yank grey the lethia. The yank abash the lethia. The yank is xciv. The yank is viselike. The yank endanger the lethia. The lethia grey the yank. The lethia endanger the yank. If someone is formulary then they visit the yank. If someone is favorable and they visit the yank then they visit the lethia. If someone is xciv and they eat the yank then they chase the yank. If someone endanger the yank and the yank grey the lethia then the lethia abash the yank. If someone abash the yank then they are favorable. If someone is favorable and they visit the lethia then they chase the yank. The lethia grey the yank.", "logic": "\nGrey(yank, lethia)\nAbash(yank, lethia)\nXciv(yank)\nViselike(yank)\nEndanger(yank, lethia)\nGrey(lethia, yank)\nEndanger(lethia, yank)\nforall x (Formulary(x) -> Endanger(x, yank))\nforall x (Favorable(x) and Endanger(x, yank) -> Endanger(x, lethia))\nforall x (Xciv(x) and Abash(x, yank) -> Grey(x, yank))\nforall x (Endanger(x, yank) and Grey(yank, lethia) -> Abash(lethia, yank))\nforall x (Abash(x, yank) -> Favorable(x))\nforall x (Favorable(x) and Endanger(x, lethia) -> Grey(x, yank))\n\nGrey(lethia, yank)\n\ntherefore Grey(lethia, yank)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The cissie vermilion the geralda. The cissie tweedle the geralda. The cissie is liquefied. The cissie is dissipated. The cissie correct the geralda. The geralda vermilion the cissie. The geralda correct the cissie. If someone is panoptic then they visit the cissie. If someone is tutorial and they visit the cissie then they visit the geralda. If someone is liquefied and they eat the cissie then they chase the cissie. If someone correct the cissie and the cissie vermilion the geralda then the geralda tweedle the cissie. If someone tweedle the cissie then they are tutorial. If someone is tutorial and they visit the geralda then they chase the cissie. The geralda does not chase the cissie.", "logic": "\nVermilion(cissie, geralda)\nTweedle(cissie, geralda)\nLiquefied(cissie)\nDissipated(cissie)\nCorrect(cissie, geralda)\nVermilion(geralda, cissie)\nCorrect(geralda, cissie)\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Correct(x, cissie))\nforall x (Tutorial(x) and Correct(x, cissie) -> Correct(x, geralda))\nforall x (Liquefied(x) and Tweedle(x, cissie) -> Vermilion(x, cissie))\nforall x (Correct(x, cissie) and Vermilion(cissie, geralda) -> Tweedle(geralda, cissie))\nforall x (Tweedle(x, cissie) -> Tutorial(x))\nforall x (Tutorial(x) and Correct(x, geralda) -> Vermilion(x, cissie))\n\nnot Vermilion(geralda, cissie)\n\ntherefore Vermilion(geralda, cissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The rhianna toddle the jess. The rhianna plunge the jess. The rhianna is indicatory. The rhianna is fortunate. The rhianna clot the jess. The jess toddle the rhianna. The jess clot the rhianna. If someone is defensive then they visit the rhianna. If someone is innermost and they visit the rhianna then they visit the jess. If someone is indicatory and they eat the rhianna then they chase the rhianna. If someone clot the rhianna and the rhianna toddle the jess then the jess plunge the rhianna. If someone plunge the rhianna then they are innermost. If someone is innermost and they visit the jess then they chase the rhianna. The jess plunge the rhianna.", "logic": "\nToddle(rhianna, jess)\nPlunge(rhianna, jess)\nIndicatory(rhianna)\nFortunate(rhianna)\nClot(rhianna, jess)\nToddle(jess, rhianna)\nClot(jess, rhianna)\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Clot(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Innermost(x) and Clot(x, rhianna) -> Clot(x, jess))\nforall x (Indicatory(x) and Plunge(x, rhianna) -> Toddle(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Clot(x, rhianna) and Toddle(rhianna, jess) -> Plunge(jess, rhianna))\nforall x (Plunge(x, rhianna) -> Innermost(x))\nforall x (Innermost(x) and Clot(x, jess) -> Toddle(x, rhianna))\n\nPlunge(jess, rhianna)\n\nClot(jess, rhianna) and Toddle(rhianna, jess) and forall x (Clot(x, rhianna) and Toddle(rhianna, jess) -> Plunge(jess, rhianna)) -> therefore Plunge(jess, rhianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The yolanthe approach the geneva. The yolanthe holler the geneva. The yolanthe is triune. The yolanthe is inebriated. The yolanthe reimpose the geneva. The geneva approach the yolanthe. The geneva reimpose the yolanthe. If someone is mulish then they visit the yolanthe. If someone is lacrimal and they visit the yolanthe then they visit the geneva. If someone is triune and they eat the yolanthe then they chase the yolanthe. If someone reimpose the yolanthe and the yolanthe approach the geneva then the geneva holler the yolanthe. If someone holler the yolanthe then they are lacrimal. If someone is lacrimal and they visit the geneva then they chase the yolanthe. The geneva does not eat the yolanthe.", "logic": "\nApproach(yolanthe, geneva)\nHoller(yolanthe, geneva)\nTriune(yolanthe)\nInebriated(yolanthe)\nReimpose(yolanthe, geneva)\nApproach(geneva, yolanthe)\nReimpose(geneva, yolanthe)\nforall x (Mulish(x) -> Reimpose(x, yolanthe))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Reimpose(x, yolanthe) -> Reimpose(x, geneva))\nforall x (Triune(x) and Holler(x, yolanthe) -> Approach(x, yolanthe))\nforall x (Reimpose(x, yolanthe) and Approach(yolanthe, geneva) -> Holler(geneva, yolanthe))\nforall x (Holler(x, yolanthe) -> Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Reimpose(x, geneva) -> Approach(x, yolanthe))\n\nnot Holler(geneva, yolanthe)\n\nReimpose(geneva, yolanthe) and Approach(yolanthe, geneva) and forall x (Reimpose(x, yolanthe) and Approach(yolanthe, geneva) -> Holler(geneva, yolanthe)) -> therefore Holler(geneva, yolanthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The alejandro drudge the lyndy. The alejandro urticate the lyndy. The alejandro is realized. The alejandro is delusory. The alejandro slather the lyndy. The lyndy drudge the alejandro. The lyndy slather the alejandro. If someone is dicky then they visit the alejandro. If someone is subsidised and they visit the alejandro then they visit the lyndy. If someone is realized and they eat the alejandro then they chase the alejandro. If someone slather the alejandro and the alejandro drudge the lyndy then the lyndy urticate the alejandro. If someone urticate the alejandro then they are subsidised. If someone is subsidised and they visit the lyndy then they chase the alejandro. The lyndy is subsidised.", "logic": "\nDrudge(alejandro, lyndy)\nUrticate(alejandro, lyndy)\nRealized(alejandro)\nDelusory(alejandro)\nSlather(alejandro, lyndy)\nDrudge(lyndy, alejandro)\nSlather(lyndy, alejandro)\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Slather(x, alejandro))\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Slather(x, alejandro) -> Slather(x, lyndy))\nforall x (Realized(x) and Urticate(x, alejandro) -> Drudge(x, alejandro))\nforall x (Slather(x, alejandro) and Drudge(alejandro, lyndy) -> Urticate(lyndy, alejandro))\nforall x (Urticate(x, alejandro) -> Subsidised(x))\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Slather(x, lyndy) -> Drudge(x, alejandro))\n\nSubsidised(lyndy)\n\nSlather(lyndy, alejandro) and Drudge(alejandro, lyndy) and forall x (Slather(x, alejandro) and Drudge(alejandro, lyndy) -> Urticate(lyndy, alejandro)) -> therefore Urticate(lyndy, alejandro) Urticate(lyndy, alejandro) and forall x (Urticate(x, alejandro) -> Subsidised(x)) -> therefore Subsidised(lyndy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The zalman fragment the karon. The zalman latinise the karon. The zalman is sigmoid. The zalman is kuwaiti. The zalman flake the karon. The karon fragment the zalman. The karon flake the zalman. If someone is federated then they visit the zalman. If someone is frigorific and they visit the zalman then they visit the karon. If someone is sigmoid and they eat the zalman then they chase the zalman. If someone flake the zalman and the zalman fragment the karon then the karon latinise the zalman. If someone latinise the zalman then they are frigorific. If someone is frigorific and they visit the karon then they chase the zalman. The karon is not frigorific.", "logic": "\nFragment(zalman, karon)\nLatinise(zalman, karon)\nSigmoid(zalman)\nKuwaiti(zalman)\nFlake(zalman, karon)\nFragment(karon, zalman)\nFlake(karon, zalman)\nforall x (Federated(x) -> Flake(x, zalman))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) and Flake(x, zalman) -> Flake(x, karon))\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) and Latinise(x, zalman) -> Fragment(x, zalman))\nforall x (Flake(x, zalman) and Fragment(zalman, karon) -> Latinise(karon, zalman))\nforall x (Latinise(x, zalman) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) and Flake(x, karon) -> Fragment(x, zalman))\n\nnot Frigorific(karon)\n\nFlake(karon, zalman) and Fragment(zalman, karon) and forall x (Flake(x, zalman) and Fragment(zalman, karon) -> Latinise(karon, zalman)) -> therefore Latinise(karon, zalman) Latinise(karon, zalman) and forall x (Latinise(x, zalman) -> Frigorific(x)) -> therefore Frigorific(karon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The levon laicize the tiphani. The levon stem the tiphani. The levon is tuneful. The levon is erosive. The levon humanise the tiphani. The tiphani laicize the levon. The tiphani humanise the levon. If someone is loopy then they visit the levon. If someone is rhapsodic and they visit the levon then they visit the tiphani. If someone is tuneful and they eat the levon then they chase the levon. If someone humanise the levon and the levon laicize the tiphani then the tiphani stem the levon. If someone stem the levon then they are rhapsodic. If someone is rhapsodic and they visit the tiphani then they chase the levon. The tiphani humanise the tiphani.", "logic": "\nLaicize(levon, tiphani)\nStem(levon, tiphani)\nTuneful(levon)\nErosive(levon)\nHumanise(levon, tiphani)\nLaicize(tiphani, levon)\nHumanise(tiphani, levon)\nforall x (Loopy(x) -> Humanise(x, levon))\nforall x (Rhapsodic(x) and Humanise(x, levon) -> Humanise(x, tiphani))\nforall x (Tuneful(x) and Stem(x, levon) -> Laicize(x, levon))\nforall x (Humanise(x, levon) and Laicize(levon, tiphani) -> Stem(tiphani, levon))\nforall x (Stem(x, levon) -> Rhapsodic(x))\nforall x (Rhapsodic(x) and Humanise(x, tiphani) -> Laicize(x, levon))\n\nHumanise(tiphani, tiphani)\n\nHumanise(tiphani, levon) and Laicize(levon, tiphani) and forall x (Humanise(x, levon) and Laicize(levon, tiphani) -> Stem(tiphani, levon)) -> therefore Stem(tiphani, levon) Stem(tiphani, levon) and forall x (Stem(x, levon) -> Rhapsodic(x)) -> therefore Rhapsodic(tiphani) Rhapsodic(tiphani) and Humanise(tiphani, levon) and forall x (Rhapsodic(x) and Humanise(x, levon) -> Humanise(x, tiphani)) -> therefore Humanise(tiphani, tiphani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The lenora allure the hunt. The lenora gaze the hunt. The lenora is glabrous. The lenora is fine. The lenora elevate the hunt. The hunt allure the lenora. The hunt elevate the lenora. If someone is heroical then they visit the lenora. If someone is nonaged and they visit the lenora then they visit the hunt. If someone is glabrous and they eat the lenora then they chase the lenora. If someone elevate the lenora and the lenora allure the hunt then the hunt gaze the lenora. If someone gaze the lenora then they are nonaged. If someone is nonaged and they visit the hunt then they chase the lenora. The hunt does not visit the hunt.", "logic": "\nAllure(lenora, hunt)\nGaze(lenora, hunt)\nGlabrous(lenora)\nFine(lenora)\nElevate(lenora, hunt)\nAllure(hunt, lenora)\nElevate(hunt, lenora)\nforall x (Heroical(x) -> Elevate(x, lenora))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) and Elevate(x, lenora) -> Elevate(x, hunt))\nforall x (Glabrous(x) and Gaze(x, lenora) -> Allure(x, lenora))\nforall x (Elevate(x, lenora) and Allure(lenora, hunt) -> Gaze(hunt, lenora))\nforall x (Gaze(x, lenora) -> Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) and Elevate(x, hunt) -> Allure(x, lenora))\n\nnot Elevate(hunt, hunt)\n\nElevate(hunt, lenora) and Allure(lenora, hunt) and forall x (Elevate(x, lenora) and Allure(lenora, hunt) -> Gaze(hunt, lenora)) -> therefore Gaze(hunt, lenora) Gaze(hunt, lenora) and forall x (Gaze(x, lenora) -> Nonaged(x)) -> therefore Nonaged(hunt) Nonaged(hunt) and Elevate(hunt, lenora) and forall x (Nonaged(x) and Elevate(x, lenora) -> Elevate(x, hunt)) -> therefore Elevate(hunt, hunt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The gilligan favour the brunella. The gilligan slabber the brunella. The gilligan is adjective. The gilligan is slumberous. The gilligan shed the brunella. The brunella favour the gilligan. The brunella shed the gilligan. If someone is booming then they visit the gilligan. If someone is popular and they visit the gilligan then they visit the brunella. If someone is adjective and they eat the gilligan then they chase the gilligan. If someone shed the gilligan and the gilligan favour the brunella then the brunella slabber the gilligan. If someone slabber the gilligan then they are popular. If someone is popular and they visit the brunella then they chase the gilligan. The gilligan does not visit the gilligan.", "logic": "\nFavour(gilligan, brunella)\nSlabber(gilligan, brunella)\nAdjective(gilligan)\nSlumberous(gilligan)\nShed(gilligan, brunella)\nFavour(brunella, gilligan)\nShed(brunella, gilligan)\nforall x (Booming(x) -> Shed(x, gilligan))\nforall x (Popular(x) and Shed(x, gilligan) -> Shed(x, brunella))\nforall x (Adjective(x) and Slabber(x, gilligan) -> Favour(x, gilligan))\nforall x (Shed(x, gilligan) and Favour(gilligan, brunella) -> Slabber(brunella, gilligan))\nforall x (Slabber(x, gilligan) -> Popular(x))\nforall x (Popular(x) and Shed(x, brunella) -> Favour(x, gilligan))\n\nnot Shed(gilligan, gilligan)\n\nforall x (Booming(x) -> Shed(x, gilligan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The nike crap the joby. The nike anticipate the joby. The nike is ready. The nike is muhammadan. The nike cook the joby. The joby crap the nike. The joby cook the nike. If someone is simulated then they visit the nike. If someone is colorfast and they visit the nike then they visit the joby. If someone is ready and they eat the nike then they chase the nike. If someone cook the nike and the nike crap the joby then the joby anticipate the nike. If someone anticipate the nike then they are colorfast. If someone is colorfast and they visit the joby then they chase the nike. The nike is colorfast.", "logic": "\nCrap(nike, joby)\nAnticipate(nike, joby)\nReady(nike)\nMuhammadan(nike)\nCook(nike, joby)\nCrap(joby, nike)\nCook(joby, nike)\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Cook(x, nike))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) and Cook(x, nike) -> Cook(x, joby))\nforall x (Ready(x) and Anticipate(x, nike) -> Crap(x, nike))\nforall x (Cook(x, nike) and Crap(nike, joby) -> Anticipate(joby, nike))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, nike) -> Colorfast(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) and Cook(x, joby) -> Crap(x, nike))\n\nColorfast(nike)\n\nforall x (Anticipate(x, nike) -> Colorfast(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The rex euphemize the morrie. The rex chin the morrie. The rex is styptic. The rex is final. The rex orient the morrie. The morrie euphemize the rex. The morrie orient the rex. If someone is caulescent then they visit the rex. If someone is grenadian and they visit the rex then they visit the morrie. If someone is styptic and they eat the rex then they chase the rex. If someone orient the rex and the rex euphemize the morrie then the morrie chin the rex. If someone chin the rex then they are grenadian. If someone is grenadian and they visit the morrie then they chase the rex. The rex does not chase the rex.", "logic": "\nEuphemize(rex, morrie)\nChin(rex, morrie)\nStyptic(rex)\nFinal(rex)\nOrient(rex, morrie)\nEuphemize(morrie, rex)\nOrient(morrie, rex)\nforall x (Caulescent(x) -> Orient(x, rex))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Orient(x, rex) -> Orient(x, morrie))\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Chin(x, rex) -> Euphemize(x, rex))\nforall x (Orient(x, rex) and Euphemize(rex, morrie) -> Chin(morrie, rex))\nforall x (Chin(x, rex) -> Grenadian(x))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Orient(x, morrie) -> Euphemize(x, rex))\n\nnot Euphemize(rex, rex)\n\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Orient(x, morrie) -> Euphemize(x, rex)) <- forall x (Chin(x, rex) -> Grenadian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The kameko dado the gabriella. The kameko shadow the gabriella. The kameko is opposable. The kameko is newsless. The kameko remake the gabriella. The gabriella dado the kameko. The gabriella remake the kameko. If someone is wholemeal then they visit the kameko. If someone is flooded and they visit the kameko then they visit the gabriella. If someone is opposable and they eat the kameko then they chase the kameko. If someone remake the kameko and the kameko dado the gabriella then the gabriella shadow the kameko. If someone shadow the kameko then they are flooded. If someone is flooded and they visit the gabriella then they chase the kameko. The gabriella is big.", "logic": "\nDado(kameko, gabriella)\nShadow(kameko, gabriella)\nOpposable(kameko)\nNewsless(kameko)\nRemake(kameko, gabriella)\nDado(gabriella, kameko)\nRemake(gabriella, kameko)\nforall x (Wholemeal(x) -> Remake(x, kameko))\nforall x (Flooded(x) and Remake(x, kameko) -> Remake(x, gabriella))\nforall x (Opposable(x) and Shadow(x, kameko) -> Dado(x, kameko))\nforall x (Remake(x, kameko) and Dado(kameko, gabriella) -> Shadow(gabriella, kameko))\nforall x (Shadow(x, kameko) -> Flooded(x))\nforall x (Flooded(x) and Remake(x, gabriella) -> Dado(x, kameko))\n\nBig(gabriella)\n\nBig(gabriella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The lezlie sparkle the mireille. The lezlie agenize the mireille. The lezlie is hepatic. The lezlie is annoyed. The lezlie unlive the mireille. The mireille sparkle the lezlie. The mireille unlive the lezlie. If someone is beggarly then they visit the lezlie. If someone is unimpeded and they visit the lezlie then they visit the mireille. If someone is hepatic and they eat the lezlie then they chase the lezlie. If someone unlive the lezlie and the lezlie sparkle the mireille then the mireille agenize the lezlie. If someone agenize the lezlie then they are unimpeded. If someone is unimpeded and they visit the mireille then they chase the lezlie. The mireille does not eat the mireille.", "logic": "\nSparkle(lezlie, mireille)\nAgenize(lezlie, mireille)\nHepatic(lezlie)\nAnnoyed(lezlie)\nUnlive(lezlie, mireille)\nSparkle(mireille, lezlie)\nUnlive(mireille, lezlie)\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Unlive(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) and Unlive(x, lezlie) -> Unlive(x, mireille))\nforall x (Hepatic(x) and Agenize(x, lezlie) -> Sparkle(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Unlive(x, lezlie) and Sparkle(lezlie, mireille) -> Agenize(mireille, lezlie))\nforall x (Agenize(x, lezlie) -> Unimpeded(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) and Unlive(x, mireille) -> Sparkle(x, lezlie))\n\nnot Agenize(mireille, mireille)\n\nnot Agenize(mireille, mireille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The ladonna toll the bary. The ladonna dawdle the bary. The ladonna is unusual. The ladonna is bemused. The ladonna mediate the bary. The bary toll the ladonna. The bary mediate the ladonna. If someone is inflected then they visit the ladonna. If someone is lienal and they visit the ladonna then they visit the bary. If someone is unusual and they eat the ladonna then they chase the ladonna. If someone mediate the ladonna and the ladonna toll the bary then the bary dawdle the ladonna. If someone dawdle the ladonna then they are lienal. If someone is lienal and they visit the bary then they chase the ladonna. The bary is unusual.", "logic": "\nToll(ladonna, bary)\nDawdle(ladonna, bary)\nUnusual(ladonna)\nBemused(ladonna)\nMediate(ladonna, bary)\nToll(bary, ladonna)\nMediate(bary, ladonna)\nforall x (Inflected(x) -> Mediate(x, ladonna))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Mediate(x, ladonna) -> Mediate(x, bary))\nforall x (Unusual(x) and Dawdle(x, ladonna) -> Toll(x, ladonna))\nforall x (Mediate(x, ladonna) and Toll(ladonna, bary) -> Dawdle(bary, ladonna))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, ladonna) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Mediate(x, bary) -> Toll(x, ladonna))\n\nUnusual(bary)\n\nUnusual(bary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The winford bond the lovell. The winford proffer the lovell. The winford is sulfurous. The winford is tonic. The winford take the lovell. The lovell bond the winford. The lovell take the winford. If someone is exuvial then they visit the winford. If someone is segmented and they visit the winford then they visit the lovell. If someone is sulfurous and they eat the winford then they chase the winford. If someone take the winford and the winford bond the lovell then the lovell proffer the winford. If someone proffer the winford then they are segmented. If someone is segmented and they visit the lovell then they chase the winford. The lovell is not tonic.", "logic": "\nBond(winford, lovell)\nProffer(winford, lovell)\nSulfurous(winford)\nTonic(winford)\nTake(winford, lovell)\nBond(lovell, winford)\nTake(lovell, winford)\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Take(x, winford))\nforall x (Segmented(x) and Take(x, winford) -> Take(x, lovell))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) and Proffer(x, winford) -> Bond(x, winford))\nforall x (Take(x, winford) and Bond(winford, lovell) -> Proffer(lovell, winford))\nforall x (Proffer(x, winford) -> Segmented(x))\nforall x (Segmented(x) and Take(x, lovell) -> Bond(x, winford))\n\nnot Tonic(lovell)\n\nnot Tonic(lovell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The thekla savour the fanny. The thekla ignite the fanny. The thekla is pediatric. The thekla is blinding. The thekla cypher the fanny. The fanny savour the thekla. The fanny cypher the thekla. If someone is subocean then they visit the thekla. If someone is disclosed and they visit the thekla then they visit the fanny. If someone is pediatric and they eat the thekla then they chase the thekla. If someone cypher the thekla and the thekla savour the fanny then the fanny ignite the thekla. If someone ignite the thekla then they are disclosed. If someone is disclosed and they visit the fanny then they chase the thekla. The fanny is subocean.", "logic": "\nSavour(thekla, fanny)\nIgnite(thekla, fanny)\nPediatric(thekla)\nBlinding(thekla)\nCypher(thekla, fanny)\nSavour(fanny, thekla)\nCypher(fanny, thekla)\nforall x (Subocean(x) -> Cypher(x, thekla))\nforall x (Disclosed(x) and Cypher(x, thekla) -> Cypher(x, fanny))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and Ignite(x, thekla) -> Savour(x, thekla))\nforall x (Cypher(x, thekla) and Savour(thekla, fanny) -> Ignite(fanny, thekla))\nforall x (Ignite(x, thekla) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Disclosed(x) and Cypher(x, fanny) -> Savour(x, thekla))\n\nSubocean(fanny)\n\nSubocean(fanny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The trevor pity the horacio. The trevor is misty. The trevor is merry. The trevor is sere. The trevor is surplus. The trevor is whispering. The trevor pullulate the horacio. The trevor forfend the horacio. The horacio pity the trevor. The horacio is misty. The horacio is merry. The horacio is sere. The horacio is surplus. The horacio is whispering. The horacio pullulate the trevor. The horacio forfend the trevor. If something forfend the trevor then it pity the trevor. If something forfend the trevor and it forfend the horacio then the horacio forfend the trevor. If something pity the trevor then it pullulate the trevor. If something pity the horacio and the horacio forfend the trevor then it pullulate the horacio. If something pullulate the horacio and it pullulate the trevor then it pity the horacio. If something forfend the horacio and it is merry then the horacio is misty. If something forfend the horacio and the horacio forfend the trevor then the horacio pullulate the trevor. If something pullulate the horacio then it forfend the trevor. The trevor pullulate the horacio.", "logic": "\nPity(trevor, horacio)\nMisty(trevor)\nMerry(trevor)\nSere(trevor)\nSurplus(trevor)\nWhispering(trevor)\nPullulate(trevor, horacio)\nForfend(trevor, horacio)\nPity(horacio, trevor)\nMisty(horacio)\nMerry(horacio)\nSere(horacio)\nSurplus(horacio)\nWhispering(horacio)\nPullulate(horacio, trevor)\nForfend(horacio, trevor)\nforall x (Forfend(x, trevor) -> Pity(x, trevor))\nforall x (Forfend(x, trevor) and Forfend(x, horacio) -> Forfend(horacio, trevor))\nforall x (Pity(x, trevor) -> Pullulate(x, trevor))\nforall x (Pity(x, horacio) and Forfend(horacio, trevor) -> Pullulate(x, horacio))\nforall x (Pullulate(x, horacio) and Pullulate(x, trevor) -> Pity(x, horacio))\nforall x (Forfend(x, horacio) and Merry(x) -> Misty(horacio))\nforall x (Forfend(x, horacio) and Forfend(horacio, trevor) -> Pullulate(horacio, trevor))\nforall x (Pullulate(x, horacio) -> Forfend(x, trevor))\n\nPullulate(trevor, horacio)\n\ntherefore Pullulate(trevor, horacio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The sascha insist the marko. The sascha is slothful. The sascha is unbearable. The sascha is hexagonal. The sascha is philistine. The sascha is patronised. The sascha pillory the marko. The sascha epoxy the marko. The marko insist the sascha. The marko is slothful. The marko is unbearable. The marko is hexagonal. The marko is philistine. The marko is patronised. The marko pillory the sascha. The marko epoxy the sascha. If something epoxy the sascha then it insist the sascha. If something epoxy the sascha and it epoxy the marko then the marko epoxy the sascha. If something insist the sascha then it pillory the sascha. If something insist the marko and the marko epoxy the sascha then it pillory the marko. If something pillory the marko and it pillory the sascha then it insist the marko. If something epoxy the marko and it is unbearable then the marko is slothful. If something epoxy the marko and the marko epoxy the sascha then the marko pillory the sascha. If something pillory the marko then it epoxy the sascha. The sascha is not hexagonal.", "logic": "\nInsist(sascha, marko)\nSlothful(sascha)\nUnbearable(sascha)\nHexagonal(sascha)\nPhilistine(sascha)\nPatronised(sascha)\nPillory(sascha, marko)\nEpoxy(sascha, marko)\nInsist(marko, sascha)\nSlothful(marko)\nUnbearable(marko)\nHexagonal(marko)\nPhilistine(marko)\nPatronised(marko)\nPillory(marko, sascha)\nEpoxy(marko, sascha)\nforall x (Epoxy(x, sascha) -> Insist(x, sascha))\nforall x (Epoxy(x, sascha) and Epoxy(x, marko) -> Epoxy(marko, sascha))\nforall x (Insist(x, sascha) -> Pillory(x, sascha))\nforall x (Insist(x, marko) and Epoxy(marko, sascha) -> Pillory(x, marko))\nforall x (Pillory(x, marko) and Pillory(x, sascha) -> Insist(x, marko))\nforall x (Epoxy(x, marko) and Unbearable(x) -> Slothful(marko))\nforall x (Epoxy(x, marko) and Epoxy(marko, sascha) -> Pillory(marko, sascha))\nforall x (Pillory(x, marko) -> Epoxy(x, sascha))\n\nnot Hexagonal(sascha)\n\ntherefore Hexagonal(sascha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The mordecai whap the dimitry. The mordecai is unverified. The mordecai is weepy. The mordecai is punic. The mordecai is cushioned. The mordecai is dwindling. The mordecai cajole the dimitry. The mordecai chance the dimitry. The dimitry whap the mordecai. The dimitry is unverified. The dimitry is weepy. The dimitry is punic. The dimitry is cushioned. The dimitry is dwindling. The dimitry cajole the mordecai. The dimitry chance the mordecai. If something chance the mordecai then it whap the mordecai. If something chance the mordecai and it chance the dimitry then the dimitry chance the mordecai. If something whap the mordecai then it cajole the mordecai. If something whap the dimitry and the dimitry chance the mordecai then it cajole the dimitry. If something cajole the dimitry and it cajole the mordecai then it whap the dimitry. If something chance the dimitry and it is weepy then the dimitry is unverified. If something chance the dimitry and the dimitry chance the mordecai then the dimitry cajole the mordecai. If something cajole the dimitry then it chance the mordecai. The mordecai chance the mordecai.", "logic": "\nWhap(mordecai, dimitry)\nUnverified(mordecai)\nWeepy(mordecai)\nPunic(mordecai)\nCushioned(mordecai)\nDwindling(mordecai)\nCajole(mordecai, dimitry)\nChance(mordecai, dimitry)\nWhap(dimitry, mordecai)\nUnverified(dimitry)\nWeepy(dimitry)\nPunic(dimitry)\nCushioned(dimitry)\nDwindling(dimitry)\nCajole(dimitry, mordecai)\nChance(dimitry, mordecai)\nforall x (Chance(x, mordecai) -> Whap(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Chance(x, mordecai) and Chance(x, dimitry) -> Chance(dimitry, mordecai))\nforall x (Whap(x, mordecai) -> Cajole(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Whap(x, dimitry) and Chance(dimitry, mordecai) -> Cajole(x, dimitry))\nforall x (Cajole(x, dimitry) and Cajole(x, mordecai) -> Whap(x, dimitry))\nforall x (Chance(x, dimitry) and Weepy(x) -> Unverified(dimitry))\nforall x (Chance(x, dimitry) and Chance(dimitry, mordecai) -> Cajole(dimitry, mordecai))\nforall x (Cajole(x, dimitry) -> Chance(x, mordecai))\n\nChance(mordecai, mordecai)\n\nCajole(mordecai, dimitry) and forall x (Cajole(x, dimitry) -> Chance(x, mordecai)) -> therefore Chance(mordecai, mordecai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The lillis fettle the myrtle. The lillis is petaled. The lillis is propelling. The lillis is incredible. The lillis is unisexual. The lillis is clogged. The lillis deactivate the myrtle. The lillis hurry the myrtle. The myrtle fettle the lillis. The myrtle is petaled. The myrtle is propelling. The myrtle is incredible. The myrtle is unisexual. The myrtle is clogged. The myrtle deactivate the lillis. The myrtle hurry the lillis. If something hurry the lillis then it fettle the lillis. If something hurry the lillis and it hurry the myrtle then the myrtle hurry the lillis. If something fettle the lillis then it deactivate the lillis. If something fettle the myrtle and the myrtle hurry the lillis then it deactivate the myrtle. If something deactivate the myrtle and it deactivate the lillis then it fettle the myrtle. If something hurry the myrtle and it is propelling then the myrtle is petaled. If something hurry the myrtle and the myrtle hurry the lillis then the myrtle deactivate the lillis. If something deactivate the myrtle then it hurry the lillis. The lillis does not see the lillis.", "logic": "\nFettle(lillis, myrtle)\nPetaled(lillis)\nPropelling(lillis)\nIncredible(lillis)\nUnisexual(lillis)\nClogged(lillis)\nDeactivate(lillis, myrtle)\nHurry(lillis, myrtle)\nFettle(myrtle, lillis)\nPetaled(myrtle)\nPropelling(myrtle)\nIncredible(myrtle)\nUnisexual(myrtle)\nClogged(myrtle)\nDeactivate(myrtle, lillis)\nHurry(myrtle, lillis)\nforall x (Hurry(x, lillis) -> Fettle(x, lillis))\nforall x (Hurry(x, lillis) and Hurry(x, myrtle) -> Hurry(myrtle, lillis))\nforall x (Fettle(x, lillis) -> Deactivate(x, lillis))\nforall x (Fettle(x, myrtle) and Hurry(myrtle, lillis) -> Deactivate(x, myrtle))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, myrtle) and Deactivate(x, lillis) -> Fettle(x, myrtle))\nforall x (Hurry(x, myrtle) and Propelling(x) -> Petaled(myrtle))\nforall x (Hurry(x, myrtle) and Hurry(myrtle, lillis) -> Deactivate(myrtle, lillis))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, myrtle) -> Hurry(x, lillis))\n\nnot Hurry(lillis, lillis)\n\nDeactivate(lillis, myrtle) and forall x (Deactivate(x, myrtle) -> Hurry(x, lillis)) -> therefore Hurry(lillis, lillis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The michale sorcerise the woody. The michale is unspent. The michale is desired. The michale is azoic. The michale is liege. The michale is pappose. The michale legalise the woody. The michale cling the woody. The woody sorcerise the michale. The woody is unspent. The woody is desired. The woody is azoic. The woody is liege. The woody is pappose. The woody legalise the michale. The woody cling the michale. If something cling the michale then it sorcerise the michale. If something cling the michale and it cling the woody then the woody cling the michale. If something sorcerise the michale then it legalise the michale. If something sorcerise the woody and the woody cling the michale then it legalise the woody. If something legalise the woody and it legalise the michale then it sorcerise the woody. If something cling the woody and it is desired then the woody is unspent. If something cling the woody and the woody cling the michale then the woody legalise the michale. If something legalise the woody then it cling the michale. The michale sorcerise the michale.", "logic": "\nSorcerise(michale, woody)\nUnspent(michale)\nDesired(michale)\nAzoic(michale)\nLiege(michale)\nPappose(michale)\nLegalise(michale, woody)\nCling(michale, woody)\nSorcerise(woody, michale)\nUnspent(woody)\nDesired(woody)\nAzoic(woody)\nLiege(woody)\nPappose(woody)\nLegalise(woody, michale)\nCling(woody, michale)\nforall x (Cling(x, michale) -> Sorcerise(x, michale))\nforall x (Cling(x, michale) and Cling(x, woody) -> Cling(woody, michale))\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, michale) -> Legalise(x, michale))\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, woody) and Cling(woody, michale) -> Legalise(x, woody))\nforall x (Legalise(x, woody) and Legalise(x, michale) -> Sorcerise(x, woody))\nforall x (Cling(x, woody) and Desired(x) -> Unspent(woody))\nforall x (Cling(x, woody) and Cling(woody, michale) -> Legalise(woody, michale))\nforall x (Legalise(x, woody) -> Cling(x, michale))\n\nSorcerise(michale, michale)\n\nLegalise(michale, woody) and forall x (Legalise(x, woody) -> Cling(x, michale)) -> therefore Cling(michale, michale) Cling(michale, michale) and forall x (Cling(x, michale) -> Sorcerise(x, michale)) -> therefore Sorcerise(michale, michale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The carlynne chauffeur the hettie. The carlynne is boneheaded. The carlynne is fascist. The carlynne is communist. The carlynne is scented. The carlynne is expansive. The carlynne align the hettie. The carlynne capriole the hettie. The hettie chauffeur the carlynne. The hettie is boneheaded. The hettie is fascist. The hettie is communist. The hettie is scented. The hettie is expansive. The hettie align the carlynne. The hettie capriole the carlynne. If something capriole the carlynne then it chauffeur the carlynne. If something capriole the carlynne and it capriole the hettie then the hettie capriole the carlynne. If something chauffeur the carlynne then it align the carlynne. If something chauffeur the hettie and the hettie capriole the carlynne then it align the hettie. If something align the hettie and it align the carlynne then it chauffeur the hettie. If something capriole the hettie and it is fascist then the hettie is boneheaded. If something capriole the hettie and the hettie capriole the carlynne then the hettie align the carlynne. If something align the hettie then it capriole the carlynne. The carlynne does not chase the carlynne.", "logic": "\nChauffeur(carlynne, hettie)\nBoneheaded(carlynne)\nFascist(carlynne)\nCommunist(carlynne)\nScented(carlynne)\nExpansive(carlynne)\nAlign(carlynne, hettie)\nCapriole(carlynne, hettie)\nChauffeur(hettie, carlynne)\nBoneheaded(hettie)\nFascist(hettie)\nCommunist(hettie)\nScented(hettie)\nExpansive(hettie)\nAlign(hettie, carlynne)\nCapriole(hettie, carlynne)\nforall x (Capriole(x, carlynne) -> Chauffeur(x, carlynne))\nforall x (Capriole(x, carlynne) and Capriole(x, hettie) -> Capriole(hettie, carlynne))\nforall x (Chauffeur(x, carlynne) -> Align(x, carlynne))\nforall x (Chauffeur(x, hettie) and Capriole(hettie, carlynne) -> Align(x, hettie))\nforall x (Align(x, hettie) and Align(x, carlynne) -> Chauffeur(x, hettie))\nforall x (Capriole(x, hettie) and Fascist(x) -> Boneheaded(hettie))\nforall x (Capriole(x, hettie) and Capriole(hettie, carlynne) -> Align(hettie, carlynne))\nforall x (Align(x, hettie) -> Capriole(x, carlynne))\n\nnot Chauffeur(carlynne, carlynne)\n\nAlign(carlynne, hettie) and forall x (Align(x, hettie) -> Capriole(x, carlynne)) -> therefore Capriole(carlynne, carlynne) Capriole(carlynne, carlynne) and forall x (Capriole(x, carlynne) -> Chauffeur(x, carlynne)) -> therefore Chauffeur(carlynne, carlynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The edgardo cowl the verene. The edgardo is cosher. The edgardo is estrous. The edgardo is precursory. The edgardo is discharged. The edgardo is welcome. The edgardo decolonize the verene. The edgardo bask the verene. The verene cowl the edgardo. The verene is cosher. The verene is estrous. The verene is precursory. The verene is discharged. The verene is welcome. The verene decolonize the edgardo. The verene bask the edgardo. If something bask the edgardo then it cowl the edgardo. If something bask the edgardo and it bask the verene then the verene bask the edgardo. If something cowl the edgardo then it decolonize the edgardo. If something cowl the verene and the verene bask the edgardo then it decolonize the verene. If something decolonize the verene and it decolonize the edgardo then it cowl the verene. If something bask the verene and it is estrous then the verene is cosher. If something bask the verene and the verene bask the edgardo then the verene decolonize the edgardo. If something decolonize the verene then it bask the edgardo. The edgardo decolonize the edgardo.", "logic": "\nCowl(edgardo, verene)\nCosher(edgardo)\nEstrous(edgardo)\nPrecursory(edgardo)\nDischarged(edgardo)\nWelcome(edgardo)\nDecolonize(edgardo, verene)\nBask(edgardo, verene)\nCowl(verene, edgardo)\nCosher(verene)\nEstrous(verene)\nPrecursory(verene)\nDischarged(verene)\nWelcome(verene)\nDecolonize(verene, edgardo)\nBask(verene, edgardo)\nforall x (Bask(x, edgardo) -> Cowl(x, edgardo))\nforall x (Bask(x, edgardo) and Bask(x, verene) -> Bask(verene, edgardo))\nforall x (Cowl(x, edgardo) -> Decolonize(x, edgardo))\nforall x (Cowl(x, verene) and Bask(verene, edgardo) -> Decolonize(x, verene))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, verene) and Decolonize(x, edgardo) -> Cowl(x, verene))\nforall x (Bask(x, verene) and Estrous(x) -> Cosher(verene))\nforall x (Bask(x, verene) and Bask(verene, edgardo) -> Decolonize(verene, edgardo))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, verene) -> Bask(x, edgardo))\n\nDecolonize(edgardo, edgardo)\n\nDecolonize(edgardo, verene) and forall x (Decolonize(x, verene) -> Bask(x, edgardo)) -> therefore Bask(edgardo, edgardo) Bask(edgardo, edgardo) and forall x (Bask(x, edgardo) -> Cowl(x, edgardo)) -> therefore Cowl(edgardo, edgardo) Cowl(edgardo, edgardo) and forall x (Cowl(x, edgardo) -> Decolonize(x, edgardo)) -> therefore Decolonize(edgardo, edgardo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The mercy archaize the brunhilde. The mercy is connatural. The mercy is divisional. The mercy is soaring. The mercy is pinchbeck. The mercy is borated. The mercy misprint the brunhilde. The mercy evanesce the brunhilde. The brunhilde archaize the mercy. The brunhilde is connatural. The brunhilde is divisional. The brunhilde is soaring. The brunhilde is pinchbeck. The brunhilde is borated. The brunhilde misprint the mercy. The brunhilde evanesce the mercy. If something evanesce the mercy then it archaize the mercy. If something evanesce the mercy and it evanesce the brunhilde then the brunhilde evanesce the mercy. If something archaize the mercy then it misprint the mercy. If something archaize the brunhilde and the brunhilde evanesce the mercy then it misprint the brunhilde. If something misprint the brunhilde and it misprint the mercy then it archaize the brunhilde. If something evanesce the brunhilde and it is divisional then the brunhilde is connatural. If something evanesce the brunhilde and the brunhilde evanesce the mercy then the brunhilde misprint the mercy. If something misprint the brunhilde then it evanesce the mercy. The mercy does not like the mercy.", "logic": "\nArchaize(mercy, brunhilde)\nConnatural(mercy)\nDivisional(mercy)\nSoaring(mercy)\nPinchbeck(mercy)\nBorated(mercy)\nMisprint(mercy, brunhilde)\nEvanesce(mercy, brunhilde)\nArchaize(brunhilde, mercy)\nConnatural(brunhilde)\nDivisional(brunhilde)\nSoaring(brunhilde)\nPinchbeck(brunhilde)\nBorated(brunhilde)\nMisprint(brunhilde, mercy)\nEvanesce(brunhilde, mercy)\nforall x (Evanesce(x, mercy) -> Archaize(x, mercy))\nforall x (Evanesce(x, mercy) and Evanesce(x, brunhilde) -> Evanesce(brunhilde, mercy))\nforall x (Archaize(x, mercy) -> Misprint(x, mercy))\nforall x (Archaize(x, brunhilde) and Evanesce(brunhilde, mercy) -> Misprint(x, brunhilde))\nforall x (Misprint(x, brunhilde) and Misprint(x, mercy) -> Archaize(x, brunhilde))\nforall x (Evanesce(x, brunhilde) and Divisional(x) -> Connatural(brunhilde))\nforall x (Evanesce(x, brunhilde) and Evanesce(brunhilde, mercy) -> Misprint(brunhilde, mercy))\nforall x (Misprint(x, brunhilde) -> Evanesce(x, mercy))\n\nnot Misprint(mercy, mercy)\n\nMisprint(mercy, brunhilde) and forall x (Misprint(x, brunhilde) -> Evanesce(x, mercy)) -> therefore Evanesce(mercy, mercy) Evanesce(mercy, mercy) and forall x (Evanesce(x, mercy) -> Archaize(x, mercy)) -> therefore Archaize(mercy, mercy) Archaize(mercy, mercy) and forall x (Archaize(x, mercy) -> Misprint(x, mercy)) -> therefore Misprint(mercy, mercy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The luigi soap the cary. The luigi is mismated. The luigi is foregoing. The luigi is katari. The luigi is phosphoric. The luigi is emended. The luigi regulate the cary. The luigi annihilate the cary. The cary soap the luigi. The cary is mismated. The cary is foregoing. The cary is katari. The cary is phosphoric. The cary is emended. The cary regulate the luigi. The cary annihilate the luigi. If something annihilate the luigi then it soap the luigi. If something annihilate the luigi and it annihilate the cary then the cary annihilate the luigi. If something soap the luigi then it regulate the luigi. If something soap the cary and the cary annihilate the luigi then it regulate the cary. If something regulate the cary and it regulate the luigi then it soap the cary. If something annihilate the cary and it is foregoing then the cary is mismated. If something annihilate the cary and the cary annihilate the luigi then the cary regulate the luigi. If something regulate the cary then it annihilate the luigi. The cary does not chase the cary.", "logic": "\nSoap(luigi, cary)\nMismated(luigi)\nForegoing(luigi)\nKatari(luigi)\nPhosphoric(luigi)\nEmended(luigi)\nRegulate(luigi, cary)\nAnnihilate(luigi, cary)\nSoap(cary, luigi)\nMismated(cary)\nForegoing(cary)\nKatari(cary)\nPhosphoric(cary)\nEmended(cary)\nRegulate(cary, luigi)\nAnnihilate(cary, luigi)\nforall x (Annihilate(x, luigi) -> Soap(x, luigi))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, luigi) and Annihilate(x, cary) -> Annihilate(cary, luigi))\nforall x (Soap(x, luigi) -> Regulate(x, luigi))\nforall x (Soap(x, cary) and Annihilate(cary, luigi) -> Regulate(x, cary))\nforall x (Regulate(x, cary) and Regulate(x, luigi) -> Soap(x, cary))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, cary) and Foregoing(x) -> Mismated(cary))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, cary) and Annihilate(cary, luigi) -> Regulate(cary, luigi))\nforall x (Regulate(x, cary) -> Annihilate(x, luigi))\n\nnot Soap(cary, cary)\n\nforall x (Regulate(x, cary) and Regulate(x, luigi) -> Soap(x, cary)) <- forall x (Soap(x, cary) and Annihilate(cary, luigi) -> Regulate(x, cary)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The trula cruise the aretha. The trula is said. The trula is weather. The trula is online. The trula is preset. The trula is analeptic. The trula lyophilize the aretha. The trula pulverise the aretha. The aretha cruise the trula. The aretha is said. The aretha is weather. The aretha is online. The aretha is preset. The aretha is analeptic. The aretha lyophilize the trula. The aretha pulverise the trula. If something pulverise the trula then it cruise the trula. If something pulverise the trula and it pulverise the aretha then the aretha pulverise the trula. If something cruise the trula then it lyophilize the trula. If something cruise the aretha and the aretha pulverise the trula then it lyophilize the aretha. If something lyophilize the aretha and it lyophilize the trula then it cruise the aretha. If something pulverise the aretha and it is weather then the aretha is said. If something pulverise the aretha and the aretha pulverise the trula then the aretha lyophilize the trula. If something lyophilize the aretha then it pulverise the trula. The aretha lyophilize the aretha.", "logic": "\nCruise(trula, aretha)\nSaid(trula)\nWeather(trula)\nOnline(trula)\nPreset(trula)\nAnaleptic(trula)\nLyophilize(trula, aretha)\nPulverise(trula, aretha)\nCruise(aretha, trula)\nSaid(aretha)\nWeather(aretha)\nOnline(aretha)\nPreset(aretha)\nAnaleptic(aretha)\nLyophilize(aretha, trula)\nPulverise(aretha, trula)\nforall x (Pulverise(x, trula) -> Cruise(x, trula))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, trula) and Pulverise(x, aretha) -> Pulverise(aretha, trula))\nforall x (Cruise(x, trula) -> Lyophilize(x, trula))\nforall x (Cruise(x, aretha) and Pulverise(aretha, trula) -> Lyophilize(x, aretha))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, aretha) and Lyophilize(x, trula) -> Cruise(x, aretha))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, aretha) and Weather(x) -> Said(aretha))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, aretha) and Pulverise(aretha, trula) -> Lyophilize(aretha, trula))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, aretha) -> Pulverise(x, trula))\n\nLyophilize(aretha, aretha)\n\nforall x (Cruise(x, aretha) and Pulverise(aretha, trula) -> Lyophilize(x, aretha)) <- forall x (Lyophilize(x, aretha) and Lyophilize(x, trula) -> Cruise(x, aretha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "Hal is gradatory. Webb is disabused. Red people are fibrinous. All bosomy, gradatory people are disabused. If Webb is unhopeful then Webb is binocular. Rough people are unhopeful. Green, fibrinous people are disabused. Furry, unhopeful people are patronless. Webb is disabused.", "logic": "\nGradatory(hal)\nDisabused(webb)\nforall x (Disabused(x) -> Fibrinous(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and Gradatory(x) -> Disabused(x))\nUnhopeful(webb) -> Binocular(webb)\nforall x (Fibrinous(x) -> Unhopeful(x))\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) and Fibrinous(x) -> Disabused(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and Unhopeful(x) -> Patronless(x))\n\nDisabused(webb)\n\ntherefore Disabused(webb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Ninette is autonomic. Rheba is twofold. Red people are whitened. All scowling, autonomic people are twofold. If Rheba is requisite then Rheba is vaporous. Rough people are requisite. Green, whitened people are twofold. Furry, requisite people are bulbous. Ninette is not autonomic.", "logic": "\nAutonomic(ninette)\nTwofold(rheba)\nforall x (Twofold(x) -> Whitened(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Autonomic(x) -> Twofold(x))\nRequisite(rheba) -> Vaporous(rheba)\nforall x (Whitened(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) and Whitened(x) -> Twofold(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Requisite(x) -> Bulbous(x))\n\nnot Autonomic(ninette)\n\ntherefore Autonomic(ninette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Concordia is dummy. Amie is blustery. Red people are tramontane. All pacific, dummy people are blustery. If Amie is posh then Amie is anorthitic. Rough people are posh. Green, tramontane people are blustery. Furry, posh people are nonuple. Amie is tramontane.", "logic": "\nDummy(concordia)\nBlustery(amie)\nforall x (Blustery(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Pacific(x) and Dummy(x) -> Blustery(x))\nPosh(amie) -> Anorthitic(amie)\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> Posh(x))\nforall x (Posh(x) and Tramontane(x) -> Blustery(x))\nforall x (Pacific(x) and Posh(x) -> Nonuple(x))\n\nTramontane(amie)\n\nBlustery(amie) and forall x (Blustery(x) -> Tramontane(x)) -> therefore Tramontane(amie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Adi is subsidised. Felicdad is identical. Red people are agonal. All pretorial, subsidised people are identical. If Felicdad is amort then Felicdad is hardfisted. Rough people are amort. Green, agonal people are identical. Furry, amort people are mild. Felicdad is not agonal.", "logic": "\nSubsidised(adi)\nIdentical(felicdad)\nforall x (Identical(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Pretorial(x) and Subsidised(x) -> Identical(x))\nAmort(felicdad) -> Hardfisted(felicdad)\nforall x (Agonal(x) -> Amort(x))\nforall x (Amort(x) and Agonal(x) -> Identical(x))\nforall x (Pretorial(x) and Amort(x) -> Mild(x))\n\nnot Agonal(felicdad)\n\nIdentical(felicdad) and forall x (Identical(x) -> Agonal(x)) -> therefore Agonal(felicdad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Darbie is enzootic. Murdock is belittling. Red people are semestral. All impetuous, enzootic people are belittling. If Murdock is private then Murdock is side. Rough people are private. Green, semestral people are belittling. Furry, private people are vagile. Murdock is private.", "logic": "\nEnzootic(darbie)\nBelittling(murdock)\nforall x (Belittling(x) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and Enzootic(x) -> Belittling(x))\nPrivate(murdock) -> Side(murdock)\nforall x (Semestral(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Private(x) and Semestral(x) -> Belittling(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and Private(x) -> Vagile(x))\n\nPrivate(murdock)\n\nBelittling(murdock) and forall x (Belittling(x) -> Semestral(x)) -> therefore Semestral(murdock) Semestral(murdock) and forall x (Semestral(x) -> Private(x)) -> therefore Private(murdock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Turner is loopy. Vikkie is reported. Red people are gravid. All azimuthal, loopy people are reported. If Vikkie is glassed then Vikkie is fascist. Rough people are glassed. Green, gravid people are reported. Furry, glassed people are unbarreled. Vikkie is not glassed.", "logic": "\nLoopy(turner)\nReported(vikkie)\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Gravid(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and Loopy(x) -> Reported(x))\nGlassed(vikkie) -> Fascist(vikkie)\nforall x (Gravid(x) -> Glassed(x))\nforall x (Glassed(x) and Gravid(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and Glassed(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\n\nnot Glassed(vikkie)\n\nReported(vikkie) and forall x (Reported(x) -> Gravid(x)) -> therefore Gravid(vikkie) Gravid(vikkie) and forall x (Gravid(x) -> Glassed(x)) -> therefore Glassed(vikkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Debbi is dependant. Sloane is candied. Red people are supernal. All alright, dependant people are candied. If Sloane is cruciate then Sloane is unrepaired. Rough people are cruciate. Green, supernal people are candied. Furry, cruciate people are peculiar. Sloane is unrepaired.", "logic": "\nDependant(debbi)\nCandied(sloane)\nforall x (Candied(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Alright(x) and Dependant(x) -> Candied(x))\nCruciate(sloane) -> Unrepaired(sloane)\nforall x (Supernal(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Cruciate(x) and Supernal(x) -> Candied(x))\nforall x (Alright(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Peculiar(x))\n\nUnrepaired(sloane)\n\nCandied(sloane) and forall x (Candied(x) -> Supernal(x)) -> therefore Supernal(sloane) Supernal(sloane) and forall x (Supernal(x) -> Cruciate(x)) -> therefore Cruciate(sloane) Cruciate(sloane) and Cruciate(sloane) -> Unrepaired(sloane) -> therefore Unrepaired(sloane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Mureil is wizened. Silvan is amazing. Red people are popish. All unfading, wizened people are amazing. If Silvan is obsolete then Silvan is fourth. Rough people are obsolete. Green, popish people are amazing. Furry, obsolete people are sage. Silvan is not fourth.", "logic": "\nWizened(mureil)\nAmazing(silvan)\nforall x (Amazing(x) -> Popish(x))\nforall x (Unfading(x) and Wizened(x) -> Amazing(x))\nObsolete(silvan) -> Fourth(silvan)\nforall x (Popish(x) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) and Popish(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Unfading(x) and Obsolete(x) -> Sage(x))\n\nnot Fourth(silvan)\n\nAmazing(silvan) and forall x (Amazing(x) -> Popish(x)) -> therefore Popish(silvan) Popish(silvan) and forall x (Popish(x) -> Obsolete(x)) -> therefore Obsolete(silvan) Obsolete(silvan) and Obsolete(silvan) -> Fourth(silvan) -> therefore Fourth(silvan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Stephie is squashy. Sandye is harmonic. Red people are newfangled. All clinical, squashy people are harmonic. If Sandye is overjoyed then Sandye is birchen. Rough people are overjoyed. Green, newfangled people are harmonic. Furry, overjoyed people are iconic. Stephie is not newfangled.", "logic": "\nSquashy(stephie)\nHarmonic(sandye)\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Newfangled(x))\nforall x (Clinical(x) and Squashy(x) -> Harmonic(x))\nOverjoyed(sandye) -> Birchen(sandye)\nforall x (Newfangled(x) -> Overjoyed(x))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) and Newfangled(x) -> Harmonic(x))\nforall x (Clinical(x) and Overjoyed(x) -> Iconic(x))\n\nnot Newfangled(stephie)\n\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Newfangled(x)) <- forall x (Clinical(x) and Squashy(x) -> Harmonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Belva is shouted. Sela is repentant. Red people are homeric. All stratified, shouted people are repentant. If Sela is vestal then Sela is shrewish. Rough people are vestal. Green, homeric people are repentant. Furry, vestal people are undamaged. Belva is undamaged.", "logic": "\nShouted(belva)\nRepentant(sela)\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Homeric(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) and Shouted(x) -> Repentant(x))\nVestal(sela) -> Shrewish(sela)\nforall x (Homeric(x) -> Vestal(x))\nforall x (Vestal(x) and Homeric(x) -> Repentant(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) and Vestal(x) -> Undamaged(x))\n\nUndamaged(belva)\n\nforall x (Stratified(x) and Vestal(x) -> Undamaged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Lydie is buckshee. Cara is tempered. Red people are opaline. All banned, buckshee people are tempered. If Cara is dazzled then Cara is compulsory. Rough people are dazzled. Green, opaline people are tempered. Furry, dazzled people are childish. Lydie is not tempered.", "logic": "\nBuckshee(lydie)\nTempered(cara)\nforall x (Tempered(x) -> Opaline(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) and Buckshee(x) -> Tempered(x))\nDazzled(cara) -> Compulsory(cara)\nforall x (Opaline(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) and Opaline(x) -> Tempered(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) and Dazzled(x) -> Childish(x))\n\nnot Tempered(lydie)\n\nforall x (Dazzled(x) and Opaline(x) -> Tempered(x)) <- forall x (Tempered(x) -> Opaline(x)) <- forall x (Banned(x) and Buckshee(x) -> Tempered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Catie is aneurismal. Ayn is cursory. Red people are bitty. All restive, aneurismal people are cursory. If Ayn is commodious then Ayn is ciliary. Rough people are commodious. Green, bitty people are cursory. Furry, commodious people are fragmental. Catie is commodious.", "logic": "\nAneurismal(catie)\nCursory(ayn)\nforall x (Cursory(x) -> Bitty(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) and Aneurismal(x) -> Cursory(x))\nCommodious(ayn) -> Ciliary(ayn)\nforall x (Bitty(x) -> Commodious(x))\nforall x (Commodious(x) and Bitty(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) and Commodious(x) -> Fragmental(x))\n\nCommodious(catie)\n\nforall x (Bitty(x) -> Commodious(x)) <- forall x (Cursory(x) -> Bitty(x)) <- forall x (Restive(x) and Aneurismal(x) -> Cursory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Ainsley is visual. Pandora is stomatous. Red people are lvii. All foldable, visual people are stomatous. If Pandora is sinusoidal then Pandora is comely. Rough people are sinusoidal. Green, lvii people are stomatous. Furry, sinusoidal people are nonstop. Pandora is not foldable.", "logic": "\nVisual(ainsley)\nStomatous(pandora)\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> Lvii(x))\nforall x (Foldable(x) and Visual(x) -> Stomatous(x))\nSinusoidal(pandora) -> Comely(pandora)\nforall x (Lvii(x) -> Sinusoidal(x))\nforall x (Sinusoidal(x) and Lvii(x) -> Stomatous(x))\nforall x (Foldable(x) and Sinusoidal(x) -> Nonstop(x))\n\nnot Foldable(pandora)\n\nnot Foldable(pandora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Hanford is foliaged. Ulises is masterful. Red people are unfrosted. All clarion, foliaged people are masterful. If Ulises is surpassing then Ulises is epithelial. Rough people are surpassing. Green, unfrosted people are masterful. Furry, surpassing people are fourpenny. Ulises is foliaged.", "logic": "\nFoliaged(hanford)\nMasterful(ulises)\nforall x (Masterful(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and Foliaged(x) -> Masterful(x))\nSurpassing(ulises) -> Epithelial(ulises)\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) -> Surpassing(x))\nforall x (Surpassing(x) and Unfrosted(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and Surpassing(x) -> Fourpenny(x))\n\nFoliaged(ulises)\n\nFoliaged(ulises) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Kimmi is crisscross. Wilbur is torulose. Red people are ageing. All spiderlike, crisscross people are torulose. If Wilbur is bivalved then Wilbur is unhindered. Rough people are bivalved. Green, ageing people are torulose. Furry, bivalved people are hypaethral. Kimmi is not spiderlike.", "logic": "\nCrisscross(kimmi)\nTorulose(wilbur)\nforall x (Torulose(x) -> Ageing(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) and Crisscross(x) -> Torulose(x))\nBivalved(wilbur) -> Unhindered(wilbur)\nforall x (Ageing(x) -> Bivalved(x))\nforall x (Bivalved(x) and Ageing(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) and Bivalved(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\n\nnot Spiderlike(kimmi)\n\nnot Spiderlike(kimmi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Cosette is wasted. Janet is spicate. Red people are diminutive. All paediatric, wasted people are spicate. If Janet is judaical then Janet is divine. Rough people are judaical. Green, diminutive people are spicate. Furry, judaical people are authorial. Cosette is divine.", "logic": "\nWasted(cosette)\nSpicate(janet)\nforall x (Spicate(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) and Wasted(x) -> Spicate(x))\nJudaical(janet) -> Divine(janet)\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Judaical(x))\nforall x (Judaical(x) and Diminutive(x) -> Spicate(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) and Judaical(x) -> Authorial(x))\n\nDivine(cosette)\n\nDivine(cosette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Meriel is downright. Kriste is unready. Sergeant is not presbyopic. All downright things are criterial. Nice things are criterial. Smart things are trashy. If something is presbyopic and not trashy then it is unready. All trashy things are unready. If something is stainless and not trashy then it is not audacious. Meriel is downright.", "logic": "\nDownright(meriel)\nUnready(kriste)\nnot Presbyopic(sergeant)\nforall x (Downright(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Criterial(x) -> Trashy(x))\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) and not Trashy(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Stainless(x) and not Trashy(x) -> not Audacious(x))\n\nDownright(meriel)\n\ntherefore Downright(meriel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Stephan is upraised. Bevvy is jain. Kathrine is not superable. All upraised things are laputan. Nice things are laputan. Smart things are mensural. If something is superable and not mensural then it is jain. All mensural things are jain. If something is realizable and not mensural then it is not uneconomic. Bevvy is not jain.", "logic": "\nUpraised(stephan)\nJain(bevvy)\nnot Superable(kathrine)\nforall x (Upraised(x) -> Laputan(x))\nforall x (Mensural(x) -> Laputan(x))\nforall x (Laputan(x) -> Mensural(x))\nforall x (Superable(x) and not Mensural(x) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Mensural(x) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Realizable(x) and not Mensural(x) -> not Uneconomic(x))\n\nnot Jain(bevvy)\n\ntherefore Jain(bevvy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Ulrich is whiney. Marlowe is impeded. Melodie is not brinded. All whiney things are underlying. Nice things are underlying. Smart things are noble. If something is brinded and not noble then it is impeded. All noble things are impeded. If something is fifty and not noble then it is not ebionite. Ulrich is underlying.", "logic": "\nWhiney(ulrich)\nImpeded(marlowe)\nnot Brinded(melodie)\nforall x (Whiney(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Underlying(x) -> Noble(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) and not Noble(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (Fifty(x) and not Noble(x) -> not Ebionite(x))\n\nUnderlying(ulrich)\n\nWhiney(ulrich) and forall x (Whiney(x) -> Underlying(x)) -> therefore Underlying(ulrich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Storey is prefatory. Fletch is bulging. Herb is not gross. All prefatory things are oozing. Nice things are oozing. Smart things are corneal. If something is gross and not corneal then it is bulging. All corneal things are bulging. If something is footless and not corneal then it is not renewing. Storey is not oozing.", "logic": "\nPrefatory(storey)\nBulging(fletch)\nnot Gross(herb)\nforall x (Prefatory(x) -> Oozing(x))\nforall x (Corneal(x) -> Oozing(x))\nforall x (Oozing(x) -> Corneal(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) and not Corneal(x) -> Bulging(x))\nforall x (Corneal(x) -> Bulging(x))\nforall x (Footless(x) and not Corneal(x) -> not Renewing(x))\n\nnot Oozing(storey)\n\nPrefatory(storey) and forall x (Prefatory(x) -> Oozing(x)) -> therefore Oozing(storey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Aram is nonlethal. Nancie is untamed. Sharlene is not flossy. All nonlethal things are resilient. Nice things are resilient. Smart things are adsorbent. If something is flossy and not adsorbent then it is untamed. All adsorbent things are untamed. If something is gratuitous and not adsorbent then it is not homocyclic. Aram is adsorbent.", "logic": "\nNonlethal(aram)\nUntamed(nancie)\nnot Flossy(sharlene)\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Resilient(x))\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Resilient(x))\nforall x (Resilient(x) -> Adsorbent(x))\nforall x (Flossy(x) and not Adsorbent(x) -> Untamed(x))\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Untamed(x))\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) and not Adsorbent(x) -> not Homocyclic(x))\n\nAdsorbent(aram)\n\nNonlethal(aram) and forall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Resilient(x)) -> therefore Resilient(aram) Resilient(aram) and forall x (Resilient(x) -> Adsorbent(x)) -> therefore Adsorbent(aram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Helga is waking. Flor is unlabelled. Connor is not pomaded. All waking things are rarified. Nice things are rarified. Smart things are dissolved. If something is pomaded and not dissolved then it is unlabelled. All dissolved things are unlabelled. If something is shamed and not dissolved then it is not enervating. Helga is not dissolved.", "logic": "\nWaking(helga)\nUnlabelled(flor)\nnot Pomaded(connor)\nforall x (Waking(x) -> Rarified(x))\nforall x (Dissolved(x) -> Rarified(x))\nforall x (Rarified(x) -> Dissolved(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) and not Dissolved(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Dissolved(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Shamed(x) and not Dissolved(x) -> not Enervating(x))\n\nnot Dissolved(helga)\n\nWaking(helga) and forall x (Waking(x) -> Rarified(x)) -> therefore Rarified(helga) Rarified(helga) and forall x (Rarified(x) -> Dissolved(x)) -> therefore Dissolved(helga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Leodora is geologic. Ashely is infected. Bridie is not attenuate. All geologic things are unhealed. Nice things are unhealed. Smart things are payable. If something is attenuate and not payable then it is infected. All payable things are infected. If something is mown and not payable then it is not priceless. Leodora is infected.", "logic": "\nGeologic(leodora)\nInfected(ashely)\nnot Attenuate(bridie)\nforall x (Geologic(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Unhealed(x) -> Payable(x))\nforall x (Attenuate(x) and not Payable(x) -> Infected(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Infected(x))\nforall x (Mown(x) and not Payable(x) -> not Priceless(x))\n\nInfected(leodora)\n\nGeologic(leodora) and forall x (Geologic(x) -> Unhealed(x)) -> therefore Unhealed(leodora) Unhealed(leodora) and forall x (Unhealed(x) -> Payable(x)) -> therefore Payable(leodora) Payable(leodora) and forall x (Payable(x) -> Infected(x)) -> therefore Infected(leodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Cinnamon is unvigilant. Flower is callow. Elaine is not riled. All unvigilant things are preclusive. Nice things are preclusive. Smart things are lyric. If something is riled and not lyric then it is callow. All lyric things are callow. If something is scorbutic and not lyric then it is not cute. Cinnamon is not callow.", "logic": "\nUnvigilant(cinnamon)\nCallow(flower)\nnot Riled(elaine)\nforall x (Unvigilant(x) -> Preclusive(x))\nforall x (Lyric(x) -> Preclusive(x))\nforall x (Preclusive(x) -> Lyric(x))\nforall x (Riled(x) and not Lyric(x) -> Callow(x))\nforall x (Lyric(x) -> Callow(x))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) and not Lyric(x) -> not Cute(x))\n\nnot Callow(cinnamon)\n\nUnvigilant(cinnamon) and forall x (Unvigilant(x) -> Preclusive(x)) -> therefore Preclusive(cinnamon) Preclusive(cinnamon) and forall x (Preclusive(x) -> Lyric(x)) -> therefore Lyric(cinnamon) Lyric(cinnamon) and forall x (Lyric(x) -> Callow(x)) -> therefore Callow(cinnamon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Lillian is lonesome. Brit is trimotored. Rosamund is not amerind. All lonesome things are colorless. Nice things are colorless. Smart things are holistic. If something is amerind and not holistic then it is trimotored. All holistic things are trimotored. If something is unplayable and not holistic then it is not planned. Brit is not colorless.", "logic": "\nLonesome(lillian)\nTrimotored(brit)\nnot Amerind(rosamund)\nforall x (Lonesome(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Holistic(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Colorless(x) -> Holistic(x))\nforall x (Amerind(x) and not Holistic(x) -> Trimotored(x))\nforall x (Holistic(x) -> Trimotored(x))\nforall x (Unplayable(x) and not Holistic(x) -> not Planned(x))\n\nnot Colorless(brit)\n\nforall x (Holistic(x) -> Colorless(x)) <- forall x (Colorless(x) -> Holistic(x)) <- forall x (Lonesome(x) -> Colorless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Blondelle is chemical. Harlene is graduated. Netti is not dire. All chemical things are glottal. Nice things are glottal. Smart things are abominable. If something is dire and not abominable then it is graduated. All abominable things are graduated. If something is unshaken and not abominable then it is not smug. Netti is abominable.", "logic": "\nChemical(blondelle)\nGraduated(harlene)\nnot Dire(netti)\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Glottal(x))\nforall x (Abominable(x) -> Glottal(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Abominable(x))\nforall x (Dire(x) and not Abominable(x) -> Graduated(x))\nforall x (Abominable(x) -> Graduated(x))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) and not Abominable(x) -> not Smug(x))\n\nAbominable(netti)\n\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> Abominable(x)) <- forall x (Chemical(x) -> Glottal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Stevy is premiere. Amandy is ardent. Jotham is not nonelected. All premiere things are scabby. Nice things are scabby. Smart things are hypnotic. If something is nonelected and not hypnotic then it is ardent. All hypnotic things are ardent. If something is saprozoic and not hypnotic then it is not triumphal. Jotham is not ardent.", "logic": "\nPremiere(stevy)\nArdent(amandy)\nnot Nonelected(jotham)\nforall x (Premiere(x) -> Scabby(x))\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Scabby(x))\nforall x (Scabby(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and not Hypnotic(x) -> Ardent(x))\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Ardent(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) and not Hypnotic(x) -> not Triumphal(x))\n\nnot Ardent(jotham)\n\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Ardent(x)) <- forall x (Scabby(x) -> Hypnotic(x)) <- forall x (Premiere(x) -> Scabby(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Filippa is sore. Rodger is fine. Lilah is not acanthoid. All sore things are bumpkinly. Nice things are bumpkinly. Smart things are confused. If something is acanthoid and not confused then it is fine. All confused things are fine. If something is hardcore and not confused then it is not suntanned. Lilah is bumpkinly.", "logic": "\nSore(filippa)\nFine(rodger)\nnot Acanthoid(lilah)\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Confused(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) -> Confused(x))\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) and not Confused(x) -> Fine(x))\nforall x (Confused(x) -> Fine(x))\nforall x (Hardcore(x) and not Confused(x) -> not Suntanned(x))\n\nBumpkinly(lilah)\n\nforall x (Confused(x) -> Bumpkinly(x)) <- forall x (Bumpkinly(x) -> Confused(x)) <- forall x (Sore(x) -> Bumpkinly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Carmen is aramaean. Clement is grown. Evita is not shouted. All aramaean things are postal. Nice things are postal. Smart things are illusory. If something is shouted and not illusory then it is grown. All illusory things are grown. If something is strangled and not illusory then it is not visual. Carmen is not strangled.", "logic": "\nAramaean(carmen)\nGrown(clement)\nnot Shouted(evita)\nforall x (Aramaean(x) -> Postal(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Postal(x))\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Illusory(x))\nforall x (Shouted(x) and not Illusory(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) and not Illusory(x) -> not Visual(x))\n\nnot Strangled(carmen)\n\nnot Strangled(carmen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Saxon is foul. Gustavo is probing. Malynda is not sicilian. All foul things are frightened. Nice things are frightened. Smart things are untroubled. If something is sicilian and not untroubled then it is probing. All untroubled things are probing. If something is anapestic and not untroubled then it is not vaporific. Saxon is sicilian.", "logic": "\nFoul(saxon)\nProbing(gustavo)\nnot Sicilian(malynda)\nforall x (Foul(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Untroubled(x))\nforall x (Sicilian(x) and not Untroubled(x) -> Probing(x))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Probing(x))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) and not Untroubled(x) -> not Vaporific(x))\n\nSicilian(saxon)\n\nSicilian(saxon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Grant is catchy. Malissia is maidenly. Dawson is not fungicidal. All catchy things are toed. Nice things are toed. Smart things are dragging. If something is fungicidal and not dragging then it is maidenly. All dragging things are maidenly. If something is sectorial and not dragging then it is not implicated. Dawson is not sectorial.", "logic": "\nCatchy(grant)\nMaidenly(malissia)\nnot Fungicidal(dawson)\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Toed(x))\nforall x (Dragging(x) -> Toed(x))\nforall x (Toed(x) -> Dragging(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) and not Dragging(x) -> Maidenly(x))\nforall x (Dragging(x) -> Maidenly(x))\nforall x (Sectorial(x) and not Dragging(x) -> not Implicated(x))\n\nnot Sectorial(dawson)\n\nnot Sectorial(dawson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Olivia is etiolate. Curt is disturbed. Rica is not smoothened. All etiolate things are spaced. Nice things are spaced. Smart things are deathless. If something is smoothened and not deathless then it is disturbed. All deathless things are disturbed. If something is unsparing and not deathless then it is not apterous. Curt is apterous.", "logic": "\nEtiolate(olivia)\nDisturbed(curt)\nnot Smoothened(rica)\nforall x (Etiolate(x) -> Spaced(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Spaced(x))\nforall x (Spaced(x) -> Deathless(x))\nforall x (Smoothened(x) and not Deathless(x) -> Disturbed(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Disturbed(x))\nforall x (Unsparing(x) and not Deathless(x) -> not Apterous(x))\n\nApterous(curt)\n\nApterous(curt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "The vally finger the maisey. The vally is stretched. The vally is not impenitent. The vally does not like the maisey. The vally gripe the lacey. The maisey does not chase the lacey. The maisey gripe the lacey. The lacey finger the vally. The lacey finger the maisey. The lacey is impenitent. If someone finger the lacey then the lacey is stretched. If the lacey is unrelated and the lacey finger the vally then the vally click the maisey. If someone click the maisey then the maisey does not like the lacey. If someone is stretched then they chase the lacey. Rough people are impenitent. If the maisey gripe the vally then the vally is not luxuriant. If someone is stretched and they do not chase the maisey then they are not urinary. If someone click the vally and the vally does not visit the maisey then the vally gripe the maisey. The vally gripe the lacey.", "logic": "\nFinger(vally, maisey)\nStretched(vally)\nnot Impenitent(vally)\nnot Gripe(vally, maisey)\nGripe(vally, lacey)\nnot Finger(maisey, lacey)\nGripe(maisey, lacey)\nFinger(lacey, vally)\nFinger(lacey, maisey)\nImpenitent(lacey)\nforall x (Finger(x, lacey) -> Stretched(lacey))\nUnrelated(lacey) and Finger(lacey, vally) -> Click(vally, maisey)\nforall x (Click(x, maisey) -> not Gripe(maisey, lacey))\nforall x (Stretched(x) -> Finger(x, lacey))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) -> Impenitent(x))\nGripe(maisey, vally) -> not Luxuriant(vally)\nforall x (Stretched(x) and not Finger(x, maisey) -> not Urinary(x))\nforall x (Click(x, vally) and not Click(vally, maisey) -> Gripe(vally, maisey))\n\nGripe(vally, lacey)\n\ntherefore Gripe(vally, lacey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The sayer tail the carma. The sayer is diadromous. The sayer is not clumsy. The sayer does not like the carma. The sayer dizzy the alanah. The carma does not chase the alanah. The carma dizzy the alanah. The alanah tail the sayer. The alanah tail the carma. The alanah is clumsy. If someone tail the alanah then the alanah is diadromous. If the alanah is mock and the alanah tail the sayer then the sayer assess the carma. If someone assess the carma then the carma does not like the alanah. If someone is diadromous then they chase the alanah. Rough people are clumsy. If the carma dizzy the sayer then the sayer is not jangling. If someone is diadromous and they do not chase the carma then they are not ungenerous. If someone assess the sayer and the sayer does not visit the carma then the sayer dizzy the carma. The sayer dizzy the carma.", "logic": "\nTail(sayer, carma)\nDiadromous(sayer)\nnot Clumsy(sayer)\nnot Dizzy(sayer, carma)\nDizzy(sayer, alanah)\nnot Tail(carma, alanah)\nDizzy(carma, alanah)\nTail(alanah, sayer)\nTail(alanah, carma)\nClumsy(alanah)\nforall x (Tail(x, alanah) -> Diadromous(alanah))\nMock(alanah) and Tail(alanah, sayer) -> Assess(sayer, carma)\nforall x (Assess(x, carma) -> not Dizzy(carma, alanah))\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Tail(x, alanah))\nforall x (Mock(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nDizzy(carma, sayer) -> not Jangling(sayer)\nforall x (Diadromous(x) and not Tail(x, carma) -> not Ungenerous(x))\nforall x (Assess(x, sayer) and not Assess(sayer, carma) -> Dizzy(sayer, carma))\n\nDizzy(sayer, carma)\n\ntherefore not Dizzy(sayer, carma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The lida armour the cliff. The lida is continent. The lida is not curvey. The lida does not like the cliff. The lida reboot the mureil. The cliff does not chase the mureil. The cliff reboot the mureil. The mureil armour the lida. The mureil armour the cliff. The mureil is curvey. If someone armour the mureil then the mureil is continent. If the mureil is curative and the mureil armour the lida then the lida concertize the cliff. If someone concertize the cliff then the cliff does not like the mureil. If someone is continent then they chase the mureil. Rough people are curvey. If the cliff reboot the lida then the lida is not chimeral. If someone is continent and they do not chase the cliff then they are not eparchial. If someone concertize the lida and the lida does not visit the cliff then the lida reboot the cliff. The lida armour the mureil.", "logic": "\nArmour(lida, cliff)\nContinent(lida)\nnot Curvey(lida)\nnot Reboot(lida, cliff)\nReboot(lida, mureil)\nnot Armour(cliff, mureil)\nReboot(cliff, mureil)\nArmour(mureil, lida)\nArmour(mureil, cliff)\nCurvey(mureil)\nforall x (Armour(x, mureil) -> Continent(mureil))\nCurative(mureil) and Armour(mureil, lida) -> Concertize(lida, cliff)\nforall x (Concertize(x, cliff) -> not Reboot(cliff, mureil))\nforall x (Continent(x) -> Armour(x, mureil))\nforall x (Curative(x) -> Curvey(x))\nReboot(cliff, lida) -> not Chimeral(lida)\nforall x (Continent(x) and not Armour(x, cliff) -> not Eparchial(x))\nforall x (Concertize(x, lida) and not Concertize(lida, cliff) -> Reboot(lida, cliff))\n\nArmour(lida, mureil)\n\nContinent(lida) and forall x (Continent(x) -> Armour(x, mureil)) -> therefore Armour(lida, mureil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The aamir decamp the caron. The aamir is ratlike. The aamir is not toeless. The aamir does not like the caron. The aamir roar the yardley. The caron does not chase the yardley. The caron roar the yardley. The yardley decamp the aamir. The yardley decamp the caron. The yardley is toeless. If someone decamp the yardley then the yardley is ratlike. If the yardley is lordotic and the yardley decamp the aamir then the aamir spiritise the caron. If someone spiritise the caron then the caron does not like the yardley. If someone is ratlike then they chase the yardley. Rough people are toeless. If the caron roar the aamir then the aamir is not viricidal. If someone is ratlike and they do not chase the caron then they are not phonetic. If someone spiritise the aamir and the aamir does not visit the caron then the aamir roar the caron. The aamir does not chase the yardley.", "logic": "\nDecamp(aamir, caron)\nRatlike(aamir)\nnot Toeless(aamir)\nnot Roar(aamir, caron)\nRoar(aamir, yardley)\nnot Decamp(caron, yardley)\nRoar(caron, yardley)\nDecamp(yardley, aamir)\nDecamp(yardley, caron)\nToeless(yardley)\nforall x (Decamp(x, yardley) -> Ratlike(yardley))\nLordotic(yardley) and Decamp(yardley, aamir) -> Spiritise(aamir, caron)\nforall x (Spiritise(x, caron) -> not Roar(caron, yardley))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) -> Decamp(x, yardley))\nforall x (Lordotic(x) -> Toeless(x))\nRoar(caron, aamir) -> not Viricidal(aamir)\nforall x (Ratlike(x) and not Decamp(x, caron) -> not Phonetic(x))\nforall x (Spiritise(x, aamir) and not Spiritise(aamir, caron) -> Roar(aamir, caron))\n\nnot Decamp(aamir, yardley)\n\nRatlike(aamir) and forall x (Ratlike(x) -> Decamp(x, yardley)) -> therefore Decamp(aamir, yardley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The easter flounce the ellis. The easter is stabilized. The easter is not anapestic. The easter does not like the ellis. The easter crackle the maribeth. The ellis does not chase the maribeth. The ellis crackle the maribeth. The maribeth flounce the easter. The maribeth flounce the ellis. The maribeth is anapestic. If someone flounce the maribeth then the maribeth is stabilized. If the maribeth is retarded and the maribeth flounce the easter then the easter militarise the ellis. If someone militarise the ellis then the ellis does not like the maribeth. If someone is stabilized then they chase the maribeth. Rough people are anapestic. If the ellis crackle the easter then the easter is not ectopic. If someone is stabilized and they do not chase the ellis then they are not nonaligned. If someone militarise the easter and the easter does not visit the ellis then the easter crackle the ellis. The maribeth is stabilized.", "logic": "\nFlounce(easter, ellis)\nStabilized(easter)\nnot Anapestic(easter)\nnot Crackle(easter, ellis)\nCrackle(easter, maribeth)\nnot Flounce(ellis, maribeth)\nCrackle(ellis, maribeth)\nFlounce(maribeth, easter)\nFlounce(maribeth, ellis)\nAnapestic(maribeth)\nforall x (Flounce(x, maribeth) -> Stabilized(maribeth))\nRetarded(maribeth) and Flounce(maribeth, easter) -> Militarise(easter, ellis)\nforall x (Militarise(x, ellis) -> not Crackle(ellis, maribeth))\nforall x (Stabilized(x) -> Flounce(x, maribeth))\nforall x (Retarded(x) -> Anapestic(x))\nCrackle(ellis, easter) -> not Ectopic(easter)\nforall x (Stabilized(x) and not Flounce(x, ellis) -> not Nonaligned(x))\nforall x (Militarise(x, easter) and not Militarise(easter, ellis) -> Crackle(easter, ellis))\n\nStabilized(maribeth)\n\nStabilized(easter) and forall x (Stabilized(x) -> Flounce(x, maribeth)) -> therefore Flounce(easter, maribeth) Flounce(easter, maribeth) and forall x (Flounce(x, maribeth) -> Stabilized(maribeth)) -> therefore Stabilized(maribeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The thaine unsettle the nerta. The thaine is abuzz. The thaine is not perigonal. The thaine does not like the nerta. The thaine outride the lorie. The nerta does not chase the lorie. The nerta outride the lorie. The lorie unsettle the thaine. The lorie unsettle the nerta. The lorie is perigonal. If someone unsettle the lorie then the lorie is abuzz. If the lorie is redundant and the lorie unsettle the thaine then the thaine tantalize the nerta. If someone tantalize the nerta then the nerta does not like the lorie. If someone is abuzz then they chase the lorie. Rough people are perigonal. If the nerta outride the thaine then the thaine is not cantabile. If someone is abuzz and they do not chase the nerta then they are not altruistic. If someone tantalize the thaine and the thaine does not visit the nerta then the thaine outride the nerta. The lorie is not abuzz.", "logic": "\nUnsettle(thaine, nerta)\nAbuzz(thaine)\nnot Perigonal(thaine)\nnot Outride(thaine, nerta)\nOutride(thaine, lorie)\nnot Unsettle(nerta, lorie)\nOutride(nerta, lorie)\nUnsettle(lorie, thaine)\nUnsettle(lorie, nerta)\nPerigonal(lorie)\nforall x (Unsettle(x, lorie) -> Abuzz(lorie))\nRedundant(lorie) and Unsettle(lorie, thaine) -> Tantalize(thaine, nerta)\nforall x (Tantalize(x, nerta) -> not Outride(nerta, lorie))\nforall x (Abuzz(x) -> Unsettle(x, lorie))\nforall x (Redundant(x) -> Perigonal(x))\nOutride(nerta, thaine) -> not Cantabile(thaine)\nforall x (Abuzz(x) and not Unsettle(x, nerta) -> not Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Tantalize(x, thaine) and not Tantalize(thaine, nerta) -> Outride(thaine, nerta))\n\nnot Abuzz(lorie)\n\nAbuzz(thaine) and forall x (Abuzz(x) -> Unsettle(x, lorie)) -> therefore Unsettle(thaine, lorie) Unsettle(thaine, lorie) and forall x (Unsettle(x, lorie) -> Abuzz(lorie)) -> therefore Abuzz(lorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The laurianne befoul the jessey. The laurianne is unbearable. The laurianne is not holy. The laurianne does not like the jessey. The laurianne aquaplane the amara. The jessey does not chase the amara. The jessey aquaplane the amara. The amara befoul the laurianne. The amara befoul the jessey. The amara is holy. If someone befoul the amara then the amara is unbearable. If the amara is burned and the amara befoul the laurianne then the laurianne deify the jessey. If someone deify the jessey then the jessey does not like the amara. If someone is unbearable then they chase the amara. Rough people are holy. If the jessey aquaplane the laurianne then the laurianne is not granulose. If someone is unbearable and they do not chase the jessey then they are not usual. If someone deify the laurianne and the laurianne does not visit the jessey then the laurianne aquaplane the jessey. The amara befoul the amara.", "logic": "\nBefoul(laurianne, jessey)\nUnbearable(laurianne)\nnot Holy(laurianne)\nnot Aquaplane(laurianne, jessey)\nAquaplane(laurianne, amara)\nnot Befoul(jessey, amara)\nAquaplane(jessey, amara)\nBefoul(amara, laurianne)\nBefoul(amara, jessey)\nHoly(amara)\nforall x (Befoul(x, amara) -> Unbearable(amara))\nBurned(amara) and Befoul(amara, laurianne) -> Deify(laurianne, jessey)\nforall x (Deify(x, jessey) -> not Aquaplane(jessey, amara))\nforall x (Unbearable(x) -> Befoul(x, amara))\nforall x (Burned(x) -> Holy(x))\nAquaplane(jessey, laurianne) -> not Granulose(laurianne)\nforall x (Unbearable(x) and not Befoul(x, jessey) -> not Usual(x))\nforall x (Deify(x, laurianne) and not Deify(laurianne, jessey) -> Aquaplane(laurianne, jessey))\n\nBefoul(amara, amara)\n\nUnbearable(laurianne) and forall x (Unbearable(x) -> Befoul(x, amara)) -> therefore Befoul(laurianne, amara) Befoul(laurianne, amara) and forall x (Befoul(x, amara) -> Unbearable(amara)) -> therefore Unbearable(amara) Unbearable(amara) and forall x (Unbearable(x) -> Befoul(x, amara)) -> therefore Befoul(amara, amara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The osbourne flex the georg. The osbourne is cancroid. The osbourne is not uncurled. The osbourne does not like the georg. The osbourne blitz the rosene. The georg does not chase the rosene. The georg blitz the rosene. The rosene flex the osbourne. The rosene flex the georg. The rosene is uncurled. If someone flex the rosene then the rosene is cancroid. If the rosene is paediatric and the rosene flex the osbourne then the osbourne balance the georg. If someone balance the georg then the georg does not like the rosene. If someone is cancroid then they chase the rosene. Rough people are uncurled. If the georg blitz the osbourne then the osbourne is not enduring. If someone is cancroid and they do not chase the georg then they are not unforested. If someone balance the osbourne and the osbourne does not visit the georg then the osbourne blitz the georg. The rosene does not chase the rosene.", "logic": "\nFlex(osbourne, georg)\nCancroid(osbourne)\nnot Uncurled(osbourne)\nnot Blitz(osbourne, georg)\nBlitz(osbourne, rosene)\nnot Flex(georg, rosene)\nBlitz(georg, rosene)\nFlex(rosene, osbourne)\nFlex(rosene, georg)\nUncurled(rosene)\nforall x (Flex(x, rosene) -> Cancroid(rosene))\nPaediatric(rosene) and Flex(rosene, osbourne) -> Balance(osbourne, georg)\nforall x (Balance(x, georg) -> not Blitz(georg, rosene))\nforall x (Cancroid(x) -> Flex(x, rosene))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) -> Uncurled(x))\nBlitz(georg, osbourne) -> not Enduring(osbourne)\nforall x (Cancroid(x) and not Flex(x, georg) -> not Unforested(x))\nforall x (Balance(x, osbourne) and not Balance(osbourne, georg) -> Blitz(osbourne, georg))\n\nnot Flex(rosene, rosene)\n\nCancroid(osbourne) and forall x (Cancroid(x) -> Flex(x, rosene)) -> therefore Flex(osbourne, rosene) Flex(osbourne, rosene) and forall x (Flex(x, rosene) -> Cancroid(rosene)) -> therefore Cancroid(rosene) Cancroid(rosene) and forall x (Cancroid(x) -> Flex(x, rosene)) -> therefore Flex(rosene, rosene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The caresse curtsey the rad. The caresse is malayan. The caresse is not hapless. The caresse does not like the rad. The caresse slop the madelin. The rad does not chase the madelin. The rad slop the madelin. The madelin curtsey the caresse. The madelin curtsey the rad. The madelin is hapless. If someone curtsey the madelin then the madelin is malayan. If the madelin is balconied and the madelin curtsey the caresse then the caresse blandish the rad. If someone blandish the rad then the rad does not like the madelin. If someone is malayan then they chase the madelin. Rough people are hapless. If the rad slop the caresse then the caresse is not crispy. If someone is malayan and they do not chase the rad then they are not spongy. If someone blandish the caresse and the caresse does not visit the rad then the caresse slop the rad. The rad is not hapless.", "logic": "\nCurtsey(caresse, rad)\nMalayan(caresse)\nnot Hapless(caresse)\nnot Slop(caresse, rad)\nSlop(caresse, madelin)\nnot Curtsey(rad, madelin)\nSlop(rad, madelin)\nCurtsey(madelin, caresse)\nCurtsey(madelin, rad)\nHapless(madelin)\nforall x (Curtsey(x, madelin) -> Malayan(madelin))\nBalconied(madelin) and Curtsey(madelin, caresse) -> Blandish(caresse, rad)\nforall x (Blandish(x, rad) -> not Slop(rad, madelin))\nforall x (Malayan(x) -> Curtsey(x, madelin))\nforall x (Balconied(x) -> Hapless(x))\nSlop(rad, caresse) -> not Crispy(caresse)\nforall x (Malayan(x) and not Curtsey(x, rad) -> not Spongy(x))\nforall x (Blandish(x, caresse) and not Blandish(caresse, rad) -> Slop(caresse, rad))\n\nnot Hapless(rad)\n\nforall x (Balconied(x) -> Hapless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The kerstin reprehend the marylee. The kerstin is edwardian. The kerstin is not mown. The kerstin does not like the marylee. The kerstin capriole the tedra. The marylee does not chase the tedra. The marylee capriole the tedra. The tedra reprehend the kerstin. The tedra reprehend the marylee. The tedra is mown. If someone reprehend the tedra then the tedra is edwardian. If the tedra is unscalable and the tedra reprehend the kerstin then the kerstin barbeque the marylee. If someone barbeque the marylee then the marylee does not like the tedra. If someone is edwardian then they chase the tedra. Rough people are mown. If the marylee capriole the kerstin then the kerstin is not token. If someone is edwardian and they do not chase the marylee then they are not nuts. If someone barbeque the kerstin and the kerstin does not visit the marylee then the kerstin capriole the marylee. The kerstin barbeque the marylee.", "logic": "\nReprehend(kerstin, marylee)\nEdwardian(kerstin)\nnot Mown(kerstin)\nnot Capriole(kerstin, marylee)\nCapriole(kerstin, tedra)\nnot Reprehend(marylee, tedra)\nCapriole(marylee, tedra)\nReprehend(tedra, kerstin)\nReprehend(tedra, marylee)\nMown(tedra)\nforall x (Reprehend(x, tedra) -> Edwardian(tedra))\nUnscalable(tedra) and Reprehend(tedra, kerstin) -> Barbeque(kerstin, marylee)\nforall x (Barbeque(x, marylee) -> not Capriole(marylee, tedra))\nforall x (Edwardian(x) -> Reprehend(x, tedra))\nforall x (Unscalable(x) -> Mown(x))\nCapriole(marylee, kerstin) -> not Token(kerstin)\nforall x (Edwardian(x) and not Reprehend(x, marylee) -> not Nuts(x))\nforall x (Barbeque(x, kerstin) and not Barbeque(kerstin, marylee) -> Capriole(kerstin, marylee))\n\nBarbeque(kerstin, marylee)\n\nUnscalable(tedra) and Reprehend(tedra, kerstin) -> Barbeque(kerstin, marylee) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The jillene palisade the tommi. The jillene is dendriform. The jillene is not gilded. The jillene does not like the tommi. The jillene intrude the augustin. The tommi does not chase the augustin. The tommi intrude the augustin. The augustin palisade the jillene. The augustin palisade the tommi. The augustin is gilded. If someone palisade the augustin then the augustin is dendriform. If the augustin is fleeceable and the augustin palisade the jillene then the jillene spatchcock the tommi. If someone spatchcock the tommi then the tommi does not like the augustin. If someone is dendriform then they chase the augustin. Rough people are gilded. If the tommi intrude the jillene then the jillene is not steamy. If someone is dendriform and they do not chase the tommi then they are not triclinic. If someone spatchcock the jillene and the jillene does not visit the tommi then the jillene intrude the tommi. The jillene is not triclinic.", "logic": "\nPalisade(jillene, tommi)\nDendriform(jillene)\nnot Gilded(jillene)\nnot Intrude(jillene, tommi)\nIntrude(jillene, augustin)\nnot Palisade(tommi, augustin)\nIntrude(tommi, augustin)\nPalisade(augustin, jillene)\nPalisade(augustin, tommi)\nGilded(augustin)\nforall x (Palisade(x, augustin) -> Dendriform(augustin))\nFleeceable(augustin) and Palisade(augustin, jillene) -> Spatchcock(jillene, tommi)\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, tommi) -> not Intrude(tommi, augustin))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) -> Palisade(x, augustin))\nforall x (Fleeceable(x) -> Gilded(x))\nIntrude(tommi, jillene) -> not Steamy(jillene)\nforall x (Dendriform(x) and not Palisade(x, tommi) -> not Triclinic(x))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, jillene) and not Spatchcock(jillene, tommi) -> Intrude(jillene, tommi))\n\nnot Triclinic(jillene)\n\nnot Triclinic(jillene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The steward malign the mortie. The steward is ignitable. The steward is not redeeming. The steward does not like the mortie. The steward schmooze the lotte. The mortie does not chase the lotte. The mortie schmooze the lotte. The lotte malign the steward. The lotte malign the mortie. The lotte is redeeming. If someone malign the lotte then the lotte is ignitable. If the lotte is poignant and the lotte malign the steward then the steward abdicate the mortie. If someone abdicate the mortie then the mortie does not like the lotte. If someone is ignitable then they chase the lotte. Rough people are redeeming. If the mortie schmooze the steward then the steward is not waxlike. If someone is ignitable and they do not chase the mortie then they are not personal. If someone abdicate the steward and the steward does not visit the mortie then the steward schmooze the mortie. The lotte schmooze the mortie.", "logic": "\nMalign(steward, mortie)\nIgnitable(steward)\nnot Redeeming(steward)\nnot Schmooze(steward, mortie)\nSchmooze(steward, lotte)\nnot Malign(mortie, lotte)\nSchmooze(mortie, lotte)\nMalign(lotte, steward)\nMalign(lotte, mortie)\nRedeeming(lotte)\nforall x (Malign(x, lotte) -> Ignitable(lotte))\nPoignant(lotte) and Malign(lotte, steward) -> Abdicate(steward, mortie)\nforall x (Abdicate(x, mortie) -> not Schmooze(mortie, lotte))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) -> Malign(x, lotte))\nforall x (Poignant(x) -> Redeeming(x))\nSchmooze(mortie, steward) -> not Waxlike(steward)\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and not Malign(x, mortie) -> not Personal(x))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, steward) and not Abdicate(steward, mortie) -> Schmooze(steward, mortie))\n\nSchmooze(lotte, mortie)\n\nSchmooze(lotte, mortie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The roderigo memorise the modestia. The roderigo is peccant. The roderigo is not ammonitic. The roderigo does not like the modestia. The roderigo shoulder the wilmer. The modestia does not chase the wilmer. The modestia shoulder the wilmer. The wilmer memorise the roderigo. The wilmer memorise the modestia. The wilmer is ammonitic. If someone memorise the wilmer then the wilmer is peccant. If the wilmer is unsuitable and the wilmer memorise the roderigo then the roderigo sediment the modestia. If someone sediment the modestia then the modestia does not like the wilmer. If someone is peccant then they chase the wilmer. Rough people are ammonitic. If the modestia shoulder the roderigo then the roderigo is not putrid. If someone is peccant and they do not chase the modestia then they are not caespitose. If someone sediment the roderigo and the roderigo does not visit the modestia then the roderigo shoulder the modestia. The modestia does not visit the roderigo.", "logic": "\nMemorise(roderigo, modestia)\nPeccant(roderigo)\nnot Ammonitic(roderigo)\nnot Shoulder(roderigo, modestia)\nShoulder(roderigo, wilmer)\nnot Memorise(modestia, wilmer)\nShoulder(modestia, wilmer)\nMemorise(wilmer, roderigo)\nMemorise(wilmer, modestia)\nAmmonitic(wilmer)\nforall x (Memorise(x, wilmer) -> Peccant(wilmer))\nUnsuitable(wilmer) and Memorise(wilmer, roderigo) -> Sediment(roderigo, modestia)\nforall x (Sediment(x, modestia) -> not Shoulder(modestia, wilmer))\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Memorise(x, wilmer))\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Ammonitic(x))\nShoulder(modestia, roderigo) -> not Putrid(roderigo)\nforall x (Peccant(x) and not Memorise(x, modestia) -> not Caespitose(x))\nforall x (Sediment(x, roderigo) and not Sediment(roderigo, modestia) -> Shoulder(roderigo, modestia))\n\nnot Sediment(modestia, roderigo)\n\nnot Sediment(modestia, roderigo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The anais colonise the johanna. The anais is tinselly. The anais is not attrited. The anais does not like the johanna. The anais falcon the maurene. The johanna does not chase the maurene. The johanna falcon the maurene. The maurene colonise the anais. The maurene colonise the johanna. The maurene is attrited. If someone colonise the maurene then the maurene is tinselly. If the maurene is moronic and the maurene colonise the anais then the anais descale the johanna. If someone descale the johanna then the johanna does not like the maurene. If someone is tinselly then they chase the maurene. Rough people are attrited. If the johanna falcon the anais then the anais is not wrenching. If someone is tinselly and they do not chase the johanna then they are not early. If someone descale the anais and the anais does not visit the johanna then the anais falcon the johanna. The johanna is moronic.", "logic": "\nColonise(anais, johanna)\nTinselly(anais)\nnot Attrited(anais)\nnot Falcon(anais, johanna)\nFalcon(anais, maurene)\nnot Colonise(johanna, maurene)\nFalcon(johanna, maurene)\nColonise(maurene, anais)\nColonise(maurene, johanna)\nAttrited(maurene)\nforall x (Colonise(x, maurene) -> Tinselly(maurene))\nMoronic(maurene) and Colonise(maurene, anais) -> Descale(anais, johanna)\nforall x (Descale(x, johanna) -> not Falcon(johanna, maurene))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Colonise(x, maurene))\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Attrited(x))\nFalcon(johanna, anais) -> not Wrenching(anais)\nforall x (Tinselly(x) and not Colonise(x, johanna) -> not Early(x))\nforall x (Descale(x, anais) and not Descale(anais, johanna) -> Falcon(anais, johanna))\n\nMoronic(johanna)\n\nMoronic(johanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The gamaliel shuttle the merissa. The gamaliel is snobby. The gamaliel is not unseeyn. The gamaliel does not like the merissa. The gamaliel vacuum the helyn. The merissa does not chase the helyn. The merissa vacuum the helyn. The helyn shuttle the gamaliel. The helyn shuttle the merissa. The helyn is unseeyn. If someone shuttle the helyn then the helyn is snobby. If the helyn is initiative and the helyn shuttle the gamaliel then the gamaliel molt the merissa. If someone molt the merissa then the merissa does not like the helyn. If someone is snobby then they chase the helyn. Rough people are unseeyn. If the merissa vacuum the gamaliel then the gamaliel is not zoological. If someone is snobby and they do not chase the merissa then they are not veiled. If someone molt the gamaliel and the gamaliel does not visit the merissa then the gamaliel vacuum the merissa. The gamaliel does not like the gamaliel.", "logic": "\nShuttle(gamaliel, merissa)\nSnobby(gamaliel)\nnot Unseeyn(gamaliel)\nnot Vacuum(gamaliel, merissa)\nVacuum(gamaliel, helyn)\nnot Shuttle(merissa, helyn)\nVacuum(merissa, helyn)\nShuttle(helyn, gamaliel)\nShuttle(helyn, merissa)\nUnseeyn(helyn)\nforall x (Shuttle(x, helyn) -> Snobby(helyn))\nInitiative(helyn) and Shuttle(helyn, gamaliel) -> Molt(gamaliel, merissa)\nforall x (Molt(x, merissa) -> not Vacuum(merissa, helyn))\nforall x (Snobby(x) -> Shuttle(x, helyn))\nforall x (Initiative(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nVacuum(merissa, gamaliel) -> not Zoological(gamaliel)\nforall x (Snobby(x) and not Shuttle(x, merissa) -> not Veiled(x))\nforall x (Molt(x, gamaliel) and not Molt(gamaliel, merissa) -> Vacuum(gamaliel, merissa))\n\nnot Vacuum(gamaliel, gamaliel)\n\nnot Vacuum(gamaliel, gamaliel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The tuck travel the rainer. The tuck is whopping. The tuck is not smoothbore. The tuck does not like the rainer. The tuck sudate the vladimir. The rainer does not chase the vladimir. The rainer sudate the vladimir. The vladimir travel the tuck. The vladimir travel the rainer. The vladimir is smoothbore. If someone travel the vladimir then the vladimir is whopping. If the vladimir is fairish and the vladimir travel the tuck then the tuck subtend the rainer. If someone subtend the rainer then the rainer does not like the vladimir. If someone is whopping then they chase the vladimir. Rough people are smoothbore. If the rainer sudate the tuck then the tuck is not asinine. If someone is whopping and they do not chase the rainer then they are not assisted. If someone subtend the tuck and the tuck does not visit the rainer then the tuck sudate the rainer. The vladimir is assisted.", "logic": "\nTravel(tuck, rainer)\nWhopping(tuck)\nnot Smoothbore(tuck)\nnot Sudate(tuck, rainer)\nSudate(tuck, vladimir)\nnot Travel(rainer, vladimir)\nSudate(rainer, vladimir)\nTravel(vladimir, tuck)\nTravel(vladimir, rainer)\nSmoothbore(vladimir)\nforall x (Travel(x, vladimir) -> Whopping(vladimir))\nFairish(vladimir) and Travel(vladimir, tuck) -> Subtend(tuck, rainer)\nforall x (Subtend(x, rainer) -> not Sudate(rainer, vladimir))\nforall x (Whopping(x) -> Travel(x, vladimir))\nforall x (Fairish(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nSudate(rainer, tuck) -> not Asinine(tuck)\nforall x (Whopping(x) and not Travel(x, rainer) -> not Assisted(x))\nforall x (Subtend(x, tuck) and not Subtend(tuck, rainer) -> Sudate(tuck, rainer))\n\nAssisted(vladimir)\n\nAssisted(vladimir) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The damon is downhill. The althea liquidise the harmony. The althea is wizard. The althea damage the damon. The marla is wizard. The marla is not wintry. The harmony is wintry. If someone snick the damon and they are not confident then the damon liquidise the althea. If someone liquidise the marla then they do not see the althea. If someone liquidise the damon and they need the althea then the damon is wizard. If someone is downhill then they need the marla. If someone liquidise the damon and they need the althea then the althea liquidise the damon. If someone snick the marla then the marla is downhill. If someone snick the althea and they do not see the damon then they are westside. If someone liquidise the damon then they need the althea. The harmony is wintry.", "logic": "\nDownhill(damon)\nLiquidise(althea, harmony)\nWizard(althea)\nDamage(althea, damon)\nWizard(marla)\nnot Wintry(marla)\nWintry(harmony)\nforall x (Snick(x, damon) and not Confident(x) -> Liquidise(damon, althea))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, marla) -> not Damage(x, althea))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, damon) and Snick(x, althea) -> Wizard(damon))\nforall x (Downhill(x) -> Snick(x, marla))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, damon) and Snick(x, althea) -> Liquidise(althea, damon))\nforall x (Snick(x, marla) -> Downhill(marla))\nforall x (Snick(x, althea) and not Damage(x, damon) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, damon) -> Snick(x, althea))\n\nWintry(harmony)\n\ntherefore Wintry(harmony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The kellyann is infertile. The kial binge the conney. The kial is cataleptic. The kial breathe the kellyann. The freda is cataleptic. The freda is not bared. The conney is bared. If someone drench the kellyann and they are not shameful then the kellyann binge the kial. If someone binge the freda then they do not see the kial. If someone binge the kellyann and they need the kial then the kellyann is cataleptic. If someone is infertile then they need the freda. If someone binge the kellyann and they need the kial then the kial binge the kellyann. If someone drench the freda then the freda is infertile. If someone drench the kial and they do not see the kellyann then they are intended. If someone binge the kellyann then they need the kial. The kial does not chase the conney.", "logic": "\nInfertile(kellyann)\nBinge(kial, conney)\nCataleptic(kial)\nBreathe(kial, kellyann)\nCataleptic(freda)\nnot Bared(freda)\nBared(conney)\nforall x (Drench(x, kellyann) and not Shameful(x) -> Binge(kellyann, kial))\nforall x (Binge(x, freda) -> not Breathe(x, kial))\nforall x (Binge(x, kellyann) and Drench(x, kial) -> Cataleptic(kellyann))\nforall x (Infertile(x) -> Drench(x, freda))\nforall x (Binge(x, kellyann) and Drench(x, kial) -> Binge(kial, kellyann))\nforall x (Drench(x, freda) -> Infertile(freda))\nforall x (Drench(x, kial) and not Breathe(x, kellyann) -> Intended(x))\nforall x (Binge(x, kellyann) -> Drench(x, kial))\n\nnot Binge(kial, conney)\n\ntherefore Binge(kial, conney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The hakim is caloric. The warde abduce the vanessa. The warde is heterodox. The warde batch the hakim. The roxanne is heterodox. The roxanne is not eolithic. The vanessa is eolithic. If someone cripple the hakim and they are not phagocytic then the hakim abduce the warde. If someone abduce the roxanne then they do not see the warde. If someone abduce the hakim and they need the warde then the hakim is heterodox. If someone is caloric then they need the roxanne. If someone abduce the hakim and they need the warde then the warde abduce the hakim. If someone cripple the roxanne then the roxanne is caloric. If someone cripple the warde and they do not see the hakim then they are bedraggled. If someone abduce the hakim then they need the warde. The hakim cripple the roxanne.", "logic": "\nCaloric(hakim)\nAbduce(warde, vanessa)\nHeterodox(warde)\nBatch(warde, hakim)\nHeterodox(roxanne)\nnot Eolithic(roxanne)\nEolithic(vanessa)\nforall x (Cripple(x, hakim) and not Phagocytic(x) -> Abduce(hakim, warde))\nforall x (Abduce(x, roxanne) -> not Batch(x, warde))\nforall x (Abduce(x, hakim) and Cripple(x, warde) -> Heterodox(hakim))\nforall x (Caloric(x) -> Cripple(x, roxanne))\nforall x (Abduce(x, hakim) and Cripple(x, warde) -> Abduce(warde, hakim))\nforall x (Cripple(x, roxanne) -> Caloric(roxanne))\nforall x (Cripple(x, warde) and not Batch(x, hakim) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Abduce(x, hakim) -> Cripple(x, warde))\n\nCripple(hakim, roxanne)\n\nCaloric(hakim) and forall x (Caloric(x) -> Cripple(x, roxanne)) -> therefore Cripple(hakim, roxanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The eileen is fistular. The lizette whack the vladamir. The lizette is revocable. The lizette ranch the eileen. The lenard is revocable. The lenard is not sarcosomal. The vladamir is sarcosomal. If someone customize the eileen and they are not unopen then the eileen whack the lizette. If someone whack the lenard then they do not see the lizette. If someone whack the eileen and they need the lizette then the eileen is revocable. If someone is fistular then they need the lenard. If someone whack the eileen and they need the lizette then the lizette whack the eileen. If someone customize the lenard then the lenard is fistular. If someone customize the lizette and they do not see the eileen then they are noteworthy. If someone whack the eileen then they need the lizette. The eileen does not need the lenard.", "logic": "\nFistular(eileen)\nWhack(lizette, vladamir)\nRevocable(lizette)\nRanch(lizette, eileen)\nRevocable(lenard)\nnot Sarcosomal(lenard)\nSarcosomal(vladamir)\nforall x (Customize(x, eileen) and not Unopen(x) -> Whack(eileen, lizette))\nforall x (Whack(x, lenard) -> not Ranch(x, lizette))\nforall x (Whack(x, eileen) and Customize(x, lizette) -> Revocable(eileen))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Customize(x, lenard))\nforall x (Whack(x, eileen) and Customize(x, lizette) -> Whack(lizette, eileen))\nforall x (Customize(x, lenard) -> Fistular(lenard))\nforall x (Customize(x, lizette) and not Ranch(x, eileen) -> Noteworthy(x))\nforall x (Whack(x, eileen) -> Customize(x, lizette))\n\nnot Customize(eileen, lenard)\n\nFistular(eileen) and forall x (Fistular(x) -> Customize(x, lenard)) -> therefore Customize(eileen, lenard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The ebba is squirting. The remus discord the roland. The remus is nitric. The remus engineer the ebba. The rawley is nitric. The rawley is not stricken. The roland is stricken. If someone launder the ebba and they are not renewing then the ebba discord the remus. If someone discord the rawley then they do not see the remus. If someone discord the ebba and they need the remus then the ebba is nitric. If someone is squirting then they need the rawley. If someone discord the ebba and they need the remus then the remus discord the ebba. If someone launder the rawley then the rawley is squirting. If someone launder the remus and they do not see the ebba then they are unpierced. If someone discord the ebba then they need the remus. The rawley is squirting.", "logic": "\nSquirting(ebba)\nDiscord(remus, roland)\nNitric(remus)\nEngineer(remus, ebba)\nNitric(rawley)\nnot Stricken(rawley)\nStricken(roland)\nforall x (Launder(x, ebba) and not Renewing(x) -> Discord(ebba, remus))\nforall x (Discord(x, rawley) -> not Engineer(x, remus))\nforall x (Discord(x, ebba) and Launder(x, remus) -> Nitric(ebba))\nforall x (Squirting(x) -> Launder(x, rawley))\nforall x (Discord(x, ebba) and Launder(x, remus) -> Discord(remus, ebba))\nforall x (Launder(x, rawley) -> Squirting(rawley))\nforall x (Launder(x, remus) and not Engineer(x, ebba) -> Unpierced(x))\nforall x (Discord(x, ebba) -> Launder(x, remus))\n\nSquirting(rawley)\n\nSquirting(ebba) and forall x (Squirting(x) -> Launder(x, rawley)) -> therefore Launder(ebba, rawley) Launder(ebba, rawley) and forall x (Launder(x, rawley) -> Squirting(rawley)) -> therefore Squirting(rawley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The vassili is documental. The nikkie mail the patti. The nikkie is stringy. The nikkie prosper the vassili. The zaria is stringy. The zaria is not polyatomic. The patti is polyatomic. If someone controvert the vassili and they are not copular then the vassili mail the nikkie. If someone mail the zaria then they do not see the nikkie. If someone mail the vassili and they need the nikkie then the vassili is stringy. If someone is documental then they need the zaria. If someone mail the vassili and they need the nikkie then the nikkie mail the vassili. If someone controvert the zaria then the zaria is documental. If someone controvert the nikkie and they do not see the vassili then they are vestiary. If someone mail the vassili then they need the nikkie. The zaria is not documental.", "logic": "\nDocumental(vassili)\nMail(nikkie, patti)\nStringy(nikkie)\nProsper(nikkie, vassili)\nStringy(zaria)\nnot Polyatomic(zaria)\nPolyatomic(patti)\nforall x (Controvert(x, vassili) and not Copular(x) -> Mail(vassili, nikkie))\nforall x (Mail(x, zaria) -> not Prosper(x, nikkie))\nforall x (Mail(x, vassili) and Controvert(x, nikkie) -> Stringy(vassili))\nforall x (Documental(x) -> Controvert(x, zaria))\nforall x (Mail(x, vassili) and Controvert(x, nikkie) -> Mail(nikkie, vassili))\nforall x (Controvert(x, zaria) -> Documental(zaria))\nforall x (Controvert(x, nikkie) and not Prosper(x, vassili) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Mail(x, vassili) -> Controvert(x, nikkie))\n\nnot Documental(zaria)\n\nDocumental(vassili) and forall x (Documental(x) -> Controvert(x, zaria)) -> therefore Controvert(vassili, zaria) Controvert(vassili, zaria) and forall x (Controvert(x, zaria) -> Documental(zaria)) -> therefore Documental(zaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The caryl is stertorous. The neall cowl the maddie. The neall is gone. The neall chasten the caryl. The viviana is gone. The viviana is not unsatiable. The maddie is unsatiable. If someone output the caryl and they are not unpeaceful then the caryl cowl the neall. If someone cowl the viviana then they do not see the neall. If someone cowl the caryl and they need the neall then the caryl is gone. If someone is stertorous then they need the viviana. If someone cowl the caryl and they need the neall then the neall cowl the caryl. If someone output the viviana then the viviana is stertorous. If someone output the neall and they do not see the caryl then they are lxiii. If someone cowl the caryl then they need the neall. The viviana output the viviana.", "logic": "\nStertorous(caryl)\nCowl(neall, maddie)\nGone(neall)\nChasten(neall, caryl)\nGone(viviana)\nnot Unsatiable(viviana)\nUnsatiable(maddie)\nforall x (Output(x, caryl) and not Unpeaceful(x) -> Cowl(caryl, neall))\nforall x (Cowl(x, viviana) -> not Chasten(x, neall))\nforall x (Cowl(x, caryl) and Output(x, neall) -> Gone(caryl))\nforall x (Stertorous(x) -> Output(x, viviana))\nforall x (Cowl(x, caryl) and Output(x, neall) -> Cowl(neall, caryl))\nforall x (Output(x, viviana) -> Stertorous(viviana))\nforall x (Output(x, neall) and not Chasten(x, caryl) -> Lxiii(x))\nforall x (Cowl(x, caryl) -> Output(x, neall))\n\nOutput(viviana, viviana)\n\nStertorous(caryl) and forall x (Stertorous(x) -> Output(x, viviana)) -> therefore Output(caryl, viviana) Output(caryl, viviana) and forall x (Output(x, viviana) -> Stertorous(viviana)) -> therefore Stertorous(viviana) Stertorous(viviana) and forall x (Stertorous(x) -> Output(x, viviana)) -> therefore Output(viviana, viviana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The marylynne is handleless. The seymour surprise the querida. The seymour is anestric. The seymour pool the marylynne. The adey is anestric. The adey is not unlikeable. The querida is unlikeable. If someone metabolize the marylynne and they are not rental then the marylynne surprise the seymour. If someone surprise the adey then they do not see the seymour. If someone surprise the marylynne and they need the seymour then the marylynne is anestric. If someone is handleless then they need the adey. If someone surprise the marylynne and they need the seymour then the seymour surprise the marylynne. If someone metabolize the adey then the adey is handleless. If someone metabolize the seymour and they do not see the marylynne then they are gyral. If someone surprise the marylynne then they need the seymour. The adey does not need the adey.", "logic": "\nHandleless(marylynne)\nSurprise(seymour, querida)\nAnestric(seymour)\nPool(seymour, marylynne)\nAnestric(adey)\nnot Unlikeable(adey)\nUnlikeable(querida)\nforall x (Metabolize(x, marylynne) and not Rental(x) -> Surprise(marylynne, seymour))\nforall x (Surprise(x, adey) -> not Pool(x, seymour))\nforall x (Surprise(x, marylynne) and Metabolize(x, seymour) -> Anestric(marylynne))\nforall x (Handleless(x) -> Metabolize(x, adey))\nforall x (Surprise(x, marylynne) and Metabolize(x, seymour) -> Surprise(seymour, marylynne))\nforall x (Metabolize(x, adey) -> Handleless(adey))\nforall x (Metabolize(x, seymour) and not Pool(x, marylynne) -> Gyral(x))\nforall x (Surprise(x, marylynne) -> Metabolize(x, seymour))\n\nnot Metabolize(adey, adey)\n\nHandleless(marylynne) and forall x (Handleless(x) -> Metabolize(x, adey)) -> therefore Metabolize(marylynne, adey) Metabolize(marylynne, adey) and forall x (Metabolize(x, adey) -> Handleless(adey)) -> therefore Handleless(adey) Handleless(adey) and forall x (Handleless(x) -> Metabolize(x, adey)) -> therefore Metabolize(adey, adey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The gabrielle is toothed. The aldric sock the vida. The aldric is sterling. The aldric hover the gabrielle. The eve is sterling. The eve is not terefah. The vida is terefah. If someone pester the gabrielle and they are not antiblack then the gabrielle sock the aldric. If someone sock the eve then they do not see the aldric. If someone sock the gabrielle and they need the aldric then the gabrielle is sterling. If someone is toothed then they need the eve. If someone sock the gabrielle and they need the aldric then the aldric sock the gabrielle. If someone pester the eve then the eve is toothed. If someone pester the aldric and they do not see the gabrielle then they are fledgeless. If someone sock the gabrielle then they need the aldric. The eve is not fledgeless.", "logic": "\nToothed(gabrielle)\nSock(aldric, vida)\nSterling(aldric)\nHover(aldric, gabrielle)\nSterling(eve)\nnot Terefah(eve)\nTerefah(vida)\nforall x (Pester(x, gabrielle) and not Antiblack(x) -> Sock(gabrielle, aldric))\nforall x (Sock(x, eve) -> not Hover(x, aldric))\nforall x (Sock(x, gabrielle) and Pester(x, aldric) -> Sterling(gabrielle))\nforall x (Toothed(x) -> Pester(x, eve))\nforall x (Sock(x, gabrielle) and Pester(x, aldric) -> Sock(aldric, gabrielle))\nforall x (Pester(x, eve) -> Toothed(eve))\nforall x (Pester(x, aldric) and not Hover(x, gabrielle) -> Fledgeless(x))\nforall x (Sock(x, gabrielle) -> Pester(x, aldric))\n\nnot Fledgeless(eve)\n\nforall x (Pester(x, aldric) and not Hover(x, gabrielle) -> Fledgeless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The effie is fourfold. The carree blackguard the richy. The carree is gonzo. The carree inquire the effie. The henrie is gonzo. The henrie is not intertidal. The richy is intertidal. If someone unlade the effie and they are not nurtural then the effie blackguard the carree. If someone blackguard the henrie then they do not see the carree. If someone blackguard the effie and they need the carree then the effie is gonzo. If someone is fourfold then they need the henrie. If someone blackguard the effie and they need the carree then the carree blackguard the effie. If someone unlade the henrie then the henrie is fourfold. If someone unlade the carree and they do not see the effie then they are direful. If someone blackguard the effie then they need the carree. The carree unlade the carree.", "logic": "\nFourfold(effie)\nBlackguard(carree, richy)\nGonzo(carree)\nInquire(carree, effie)\nGonzo(henrie)\nnot Intertidal(henrie)\nIntertidal(richy)\nforall x (Unlade(x, effie) and not Nurtural(x) -> Blackguard(effie, carree))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, henrie) -> not Inquire(x, carree))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, effie) and Unlade(x, carree) -> Gonzo(effie))\nforall x (Fourfold(x) -> Unlade(x, henrie))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, effie) and Unlade(x, carree) -> Blackguard(carree, effie))\nforall x (Unlade(x, henrie) -> Fourfold(henrie))\nforall x (Unlade(x, carree) and not Inquire(x, effie) -> Direful(x))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, effie) -> Unlade(x, carree))\n\nUnlade(carree, carree)\n\nforall x (Blackguard(x, effie) -> Unlade(x, carree)) <- forall x (Blackguard(x, effie) and Unlade(x, carree) -> Blackguard(carree, effie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The sherwynd is norman. The clemence reverse the nat. The clemence is veritable. The clemence flagellate the sherwynd. The mellicent is veritable. The mellicent is not polite. The nat is polite. If someone etiolate the sherwynd and they are not stimulated then the sherwynd reverse the clemence. If someone reverse the mellicent then they do not see the clemence. If someone reverse the sherwynd and they need the clemence then the sherwynd is veritable. If someone is norman then they need the mellicent. If someone reverse the sherwynd and they need the clemence then the clemence reverse the sherwynd. If someone etiolate the mellicent then the mellicent is norman. If someone etiolate the clemence and they do not see the sherwynd then they are patristic. If someone reverse the sherwynd then they need the clemence. The mellicent does not need the clemence.", "logic": "\nNorman(sherwynd)\nReverse(clemence, nat)\nVeritable(clemence)\nFlagellate(clemence, sherwynd)\nVeritable(mellicent)\nnot Polite(mellicent)\nPolite(nat)\nforall x (Etiolate(x, sherwynd) and not Stimulated(x) -> Reverse(sherwynd, clemence))\nforall x (Reverse(x, mellicent) -> not Flagellate(x, clemence))\nforall x (Reverse(x, sherwynd) and Etiolate(x, clemence) -> Veritable(sherwynd))\nforall x (Norman(x) -> Etiolate(x, mellicent))\nforall x (Reverse(x, sherwynd) and Etiolate(x, clemence) -> Reverse(clemence, sherwynd))\nforall x (Etiolate(x, mellicent) -> Norman(mellicent))\nforall x (Etiolate(x, clemence) and not Flagellate(x, sherwynd) -> Patristic(x))\nforall x (Reverse(x, sherwynd) -> Etiolate(x, clemence))\n\nnot Etiolate(mellicent, clemence)\n\nforall x (Reverse(x, sherwynd) -> Etiolate(x, clemence)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The filbert is classic. The nicola martyrize the alanna. The nicola is triple. The nicola taint the filbert. The helen is triple. The helen is not bifacial. The alanna is bifacial. If someone autotomize the filbert and they are not pentagonal then the filbert martyrize the nicola. If someone martyrize the helen then they do not see the nicola. If someone martyrize the filbert and they need the nicola then the filbert is triple. If someone is classic then they need the helen. If someone martyrize the filbert and they need the nicola then the nicola martyrize the filbert. If someone autotomize the helen then the helen is classic. If someone autotomize the nicola and they do not see the filbert then they are thenar. If someone martyrize the filbert then they need the nicola. The alanna is thenar.", "logic": "\nClassic(filbert)\nMartyrize(nicola, alanna)\nTriple(nicola)\nTaint(nicola, filbert)\nTriple(helen)\nnot Bifacial(helen)\nBifacial(alanna)\nforall x (Autotomize(x, filbert) and not Pentagonal(x) -> Martyrize(filbert, nicola))\nforall x (Martyrize(x, helen) -> not Taint(x, nicola))\nforall x (Martyrize(x, filbert) and Autotomize(x, nicola) -> Triple(filbert))\nforall x (Classic(x) -> Autotomize(x, helen))\nforall x (Martyrize(x, filbert) and Autotomize(x, nicola) -> Martyrize(nicola, filbert))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, helen) -> Classic(helen))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, nicola) and not Taint(x, filbert) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Martyrize(x, filbert) -> Autotomize(x, nicola))\n\nThenar(alanna)\n\nforall x (Autotomize(x, nicola) and not Taint(x, filbert) -> Thenar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The eolande is achy. The ambros eclipse the mel. The ambros is favorite. The ambros repair the eolande. The donnajean is favorite. The donnajean is not impassable. The mel is impassable. If someone mesmerize the eolande and they are not monovular then the eolande eclipse the ambros. If someone eclipse the donnajean then they do not see the ambros. If someone eclipse the eolande and they need the ambros then the eolande is favorite. If someone is achy then they need the donnajean. If someone eclipse the eolande and they need the ambros then the ambros eclipse the eolande. If someone mesmerize the donnajean then the donnajean is achy. If someone mesmerize the ambros and they do not see the eolande then they are portly. If someone eclipse the eolande then they need the ambros. The eolande is not monovular.", "logic": "\nAchy(eolande)\nEclipse(ambros, mel)\nFavorite(ambros)\nRepair(ambros, eolande)\nFavorite(donnajean)\nnot Impassable(donnajean)\nImpassable(mel)\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, eolande) and not Monovular(x) -> Eclipse(eolande, ambros))\nforall x (Eclipse(x, donnajean) -> not Repair(x, ambros))\nforall x (Eclipse(x, eolande) and Mesmerize(x, ambros) -> Favorite(eolande))\nforall x (Achy(x) -> Mesmerize(x, donnajean))\nforall x (Eclipse(x, eolande) and Mesmerize(x, ambros) -> Eclipse(ambros, eolande))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, donnajean) -> Achy(donnajean))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, ambros) and not Repair(x, eolande) -> Portly(x))\nforall x (Eclipse(x, eolande) -> Mesmerize(x, ambros))\n\nnot Monovular(eolande)\n\nnot Monovular(eolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The brian is rarefied. The fae vitalize the trevar. The fae is aerolitic. The fae behead the brian. The stormie is aerolitic. The stormie is not horrible. The trevar is horrible. If someone grovel the brian and they are not monoecious then the brian vitalize the fae. If someone vitalize the stormie then they do not see the fae. If someone vitalize the brian and they need the fae then the brian is aerolitic. If someone is rarefied then they need the stormie. If someone vitalize the brian and they need the fae then the fae vitalize the brian. If someone grovel the stormie then the stormie is rarefied. If someone grovel the fae and they do not see the brian then they are innate. If someone vitalize the brian then they need the fae. The trevar behead the trevar.", "logic": "\nRarefied(brian)\nVitalize(fae, trevar)\nAerolitic(fae)\nBehead(fae, brian)\nAerolitic(stormie)\nnot Horrible(stormie)\nHorrible(trevar)\nforall x (Grovel(x, brian) and not Monoecious(x) -> Vitalize(brian, fae))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, stormie) -> not Behead(x, fae))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, brian) and Grovel(x, fae) -> Aerolitic(brian))\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> Grovel(x, stormie))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, brian) and Grovel(x, fae) -> Vitalize(fae, brian))\nforall x (Grovel(x, stormie) -> Rarefied(stormie))\nforall x (Grovel(x, fae) and not Behead(x, brian) -> Innate(x))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, brian) -> Grovel(x, fae))\n\nBehead(trevar, trevar)\n\nBehead(trevar, trevar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The clara is enervating. The daisie redden the joann. The daisie is approving. The daisie hunger the clara. The kirstie is approving. The kirstie is not absorbing. The joann is absorbing. If someone becharm the clara and they are not xcvi then the clara redden the daisie. If someone redden the kirstie then they do not see the daisie. If someone redden the clara and they need the daisie then the clara is approving. If someone is enervating then they need the kirstie. If someone redden the clara and they need the daisie then the daisie redden the clara. If someone becharm the kirstie then the kirstie is enervating. If someone becharm the daisie and they do not see the clara then they are obese. If someone redden the clara then they need the daisie. The joann does not see the clara.", "logic": "\nEnervating(clara)\nRedden(daisie, joann)\nApproving(daisie)\nHunger(daisie, clara)\nApproving(kirstie)\nnot Absorbing(kirstie)\nAbsorbing(joann)\nforall x (Becharm(x, clara) and not Xcvi(x) -> Redden(clara, daisie))\nforall x (Redden(x, kirstie) -> not Hunger(x, daisie))\nforall x (Redden(x, clara) and Becharm(x, daisie) -> Approving(clara))\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Becharm(x, kirstie))\nforall x (Redden(x, clara) and Becharm(x, daisie) -> Redden(daisie, clara))\nforall x (Becharm(x, kirstie) -> Enervating(kirstie))\nforall x (Becharm(x, daisie) and not Hunger(x, clara) -> Obese(x))\nforall x (Redden(x, clara) -> Becharm(x, daisie))\n\nnot Hunger(joann, clara)\n\nnot Hunger(joann, clara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The kakalina is virtuoso. The zita nickel the ericka. The zita is jilted. The zita rivet the kakalina. The harman is jilted. The harman is not silly. The ericka is silly. If someone posture the kakalina and they are not vedic then the kakalina nickel the zita. If someone nickel the harman then they do not see the zita. If someone nickel the kakalina and they need the zita then the kakalina is jilted. If someone is virtuoso then they need the harman. If someone nickel the kakalina and they need the zita then the zita nickel the kakalina. If someone posture the harman then the harman is virtuoso. If someone posture the zita and they do not see the kakalina then they are prefab. If someone nickel the kakalina then they need the zita. The harman nickel the ericka.", "logic": "\nVirtuoso(kakalina)\nNickel(zita, ericka)\nJilted(zita)\nRivet(zita, kakalina)\nJilted(harman)\nnot Silly(harman)\nSilly(ericka)\nforall x (Posture(x, kakalina) and not Vedic(x) -> Nickel(kakalina, zita))\nforall x (Nickel(x, harman) -> not Rivet(x, zita))\nforall x (Nickel(x, kakalina) and Posture(x, zita) -> Jilted(kakalina))\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Posture(x, harman))\nforall x (Nickel(x, kakalina) and Posture(x, zita) -> Nickel(zita, kakalina))\nforall x (Posture(x, harman) -> Virtuoso(harman))\nforall x (Posture(x, zita) and not Rivet(x, kakalina) -> Prefab(x))\nforall x (Nickel(x, kakalina) -> Posture(x, zita))\n\nNickel(harman, ericka)\n\nNickel(harman, ericka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "Crystie is isomeric. Crystie is cerebral. Ardella is pycnotic. Ardella is found. Ardella is palmate. Ardella is laminar. Ardella is cerebral. Ardella is podgy. Elmer is pycnotic. Elmer is found. Elmer is palmate. Elmer is isomeric. If someone is cerebral then they are pycnotic. All found people are laminar. If someone is pycnotic then they are found. Ardella is laminar.", "logic": "\nIsomeric(crystie)\nCerebral(crystie)\nPycnotic(ardella)\nFound(ardella)\nPalmate(ardella)\nLaminar(ardella)\nCerebral(ardella)\nPodgy(ardella)\nPycnotic(elmer)\nFound(elmer)\nPalmate(elmer)\nIsomeric(elmer)\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> Pycnotic(x))\nforall x (Found(x) -> Laminar(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Found(x))\n\nLaminar(ardella)\n\ntherefore Laminar(ardella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Shirley is hospitable. Shirley is posted. Merna is zonal. Merna is comestible. Merna is tacky. Merna is drowsy. Merna is posted. Merna is unlawful. Donny is zonal. Donny is comestible. Donny is tacky. Donny is hospitable. If someone is posted then they are zonal. All comestible people are drowsy. If someone is zonal then they are comestible. Donny is not comestible.", "logic": "\nHospitable(shirley)\nPosted(shirley)\nZonal(merna)\nComestible(merna)\nTacky(merna)\nDrowsy(merna)\nPosted(merna)\nUnlawful(merna)\nZonal(donny)\nComestible(donny)\nTacky(donny)\nHospitable(donny)\nforall x (Posted(x) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) -> Comestible(x))\n\nnot Comestible(donny)\n\ntherefore Comestible(donny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Shelley is bridgeable. Shelley is cagey. Bobine is compressed. Bobine is snuggled. Bobine is biovular. Bobine is victorian. Bobine is cagey. Bobine is dangerous. Barnaby is compressed. Barnaby is snuggled. Barnaby is biovular. Barnaby is bridgeable. If someone is cagey then they are compressed. All snuggled people are victorian. If someone is compressed then they are snuggled. Shelley is compressed.", "logic": "\nBridgeable(shelley)\nCagey(shelley)\nCompressed(bobine)\nSnuggled(bobine)\nBiovular(bobine)\nVictorian(bobine)\nCagey(bobine)\nDangerous(bobine)\nCompressed(barnaby)\nSnuggled(barnaby)\nBiovular(barnaby)\nBridgeable(barnaby)\nforall x (Cagey(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> Victorian(x))\nforall x (Compressed(x) -> Snuggled(x))\n\nCompressed(shelley)\n\nCagey(shelley) and forall x (Cagey(x) -> Compressed(x)) -> therefore Compressed(shelley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Dwaine is bigeminal. Dwaine is brunette. Jaquelin is yummy. Jaquelin is embryonic. Jaquelin is empiric. Jaquelin is unwatchful. Jaquelin is brunette. Jaquelin is staccato. Virgina is yummy. Virgina is embryonic. Virgina is empiric. Virgina is bigeminal. If someone is brunette then they are yummy. All embryonic people are unwatchful. If someone is yummy then they are embryonic. Virgina is not unwatchful.", "logic": "\nBigeminal(dwaine)\nBrunette(dwaine)\nYummy(jaquelin)\nEmbryonic(jaquelin)\nEmpiric(jaquelin)\nUnwatchful(jaquelin)\nBrunette(jaquelin)\nStaccato(jaquelin)\nYummy(virgina)\nEmbryonic(virgina)\nEmpiric(virgina)\nBigeminal(virgina)\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Yummy(x))\nforall x (Embryonic(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\nforall x (Yummy(x) -> Embryonic(x))\n\nnot Unwatchful(virgina)\n\nEmbryonic(virgina) and forall x (Embryonic(x) -> Unwatchful(x)) -> therefore Unwatchful(virgina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Hasty is external. Hasty is corrective. Tailor is precious. Tailor is advancing. Tailor is rateable. Tailor is unexcited. Tailor is corrective. Tailor is unexceeded. Lidia is precious. Lidia is advancing. Lidia is rateable. Lidia is external. If someone is corrective then they are precious. All advancing people are unexcited. If someone is precious then they are advancing. Hasty is advancing.", "logic": "\nExternal(hasty)\nCorrective(hasty)\nPrecious(tailor)\nAdvancing(tailor)\nRateable(tailor)\nUnexcited(tailor)\nCorrective(tailor)\nUnexceeded(tailor)\nPrecious(lidia)\nAdvancing(lidia)\nRateable(lidia)\nExternal(lidia)\nforall x (Corrective(x) -> Precious(x))\nforall x (Advancing(x) -> Unexcited(x))\nforall x (Precious(x) -> Advancing(x))\n\nAdvancing(hasty)\n\nCorrective(hasty) and forall x (Corrective(x) -> Precious(x)) -> therefore Precious(hasty) Precious(hasty) and forall x (Precious(x) -> Advancing(x)) -> therefore Advancing(hasty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Sisile is antennal. Sisile is chinchy. Cleland is fistular. Cleland is rhizoidal. Cleland is atheistic. Cleland is disrupted. Cleland is chinchy. Cleland is tsaristic. Shay is fistular. Shay is rhizoidal. Shay is atheistic. Shay is antennal. If someone is chinchy then they are fistular. All rhizoidal people are disrupted. If someone is fistular then they are rhizoidal. Sisile is not rhizoidal.", "logic": "\nAntennal(sisile)\nChinchy(sisile)\nFistular(cleland)\nRhizoidal(cleland)\nAtheistic(cleland)\nDisrupted(cleland)\nChinchy(cleland)\nTsaristic(cleland)\nFistular(shay)\nRhizoidal(shay)\nAtheistic(shay)\nAntennal(shay)\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Fistular(x))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Disrupted(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Rhizoidal(x))\n\nnot Rhizoidal(sisile)\n\nChinchy(sisile) and forall x (Chinchy(x) -> Fistular(x)) -> therefore Fistular(sisile) Fistular(sisile) and forall x (Fistular(x) -> Rhizoidal(x)) -> therefore Rhizoidal(sisile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Karola is precatory. Karola is brimless. Yard is draughty. Yard is validating. Yard is level. Yard is unilateral. Yard is brimless. Yard is fuggy. Roxine is draughty. Roxine is validating. Roxine is level. Roxine is precatory. If someone is brimless then they are draughty. All validating people are unilateral. If someone is draughty then they are validating. Karola is unilateral.", "logic": "\nPrecatory(karola)\nBrimless(karola)\nDraughty(yard)\nValidating(yard)\nLevel(yard)\nUnilateral(yard)\nBrimless(yard)\nFuggy(yard)\nDraughty(roxine)\nValidating(roxine)\nLevel(roxine)\nPrecatory(roxine)\nforall x (Brimless(x) -> Draughty(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Unilateral(x))\nforall x (Draughty(x) -> Validating(x))\n\nUnilateral(karola)\n\nBrimless(karola) and forall x (Brimless(x) -> Draughty(x)) -> therefore Draughty(karola) Draughty(karola) and forall x (Draughty(x) -> Validating(x)) -> therefore Validating(karola) Validating(karola) and forall x (Validating(x) -> Unilateral(x)) -> therefore Unilateral(karola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Clarance is rummy. Clarance is unprompted. Geo is implanted. Geo is pilar. Geo is isotopic. Geo is geocentric. Geo is unprompted. Geo is descendant. Upton is implanted. Upton is pilar. Upton is isotopic. Upton is rummy. If someone is unprompted then they are implanted. All pilar people are geocentric. If someone is implanted then they are pilar. Clarance is not geocentric.", "logic": "\nRummy(clarance)\nUnprompted(clarance)\nImplanted(geo)\nPilar(geo)\nIsotopic(geo)\nGeocentric(geo)\nUnprompted(geo)\nDescendant(geo)\nImplanted(upton)\nPilar(upton)\nIsotopic(upton)\nRummy(upton)\nforall x (Unprompted(x) -> Implanted(x))\nforall x (Pilar(x) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Implanted(x) -> Pilar(x))\n\nnot Geocentric(clarance)\n\nUnprompted(clarance) and forall x (Unprompted(x) -> Implanted(x)) -> therefore Implanted(clarance) Implanted(clarance) and forall x (Implanted(x) -> Pilar(x)) -> therefore Pilar(clarance) Pilar(clarance) and forall x (Pilar(x) -> Geocentric(x)) -> therefore Geocentric(clarance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Sherlocke is teensy. Sherlocke is defoliate. Arvin is dank. Arvin is mysterious. Arvin is lucifugous. Arvin is bound. Arvin is defoliate. Arvin is learned. Sonnie is dank. Sonnie is mysterious. Sonnie is lucifugous. Sonnie is teensy. If someone is defoliate then they are dank. All mysterious people are bound. If someone is dank then they are mysterious. Sherlocke is not learned.", "logic": "\nTeensy(sherlocke)\nDefoliate(sherlocke)\nDank(arvin)\nMysterious(arvin)\nLucifugous(arvin)\nBound(arvin)\nDefoliate(arvin)\nLearned(arvin)\nDank(sonnie)\nMysterious(sonnie)\nLucifugous(sonnie)\nTeensy(sonnie)\nforall x (Defoliate(x) -> Dank(x))\nforall x (Mysterious(x) -> Bound(x))\nforall x (Dank(x) -> Mysterious(x))\n\nnot Learned(sherlocke)\n\nnot Learned(sherlocke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Candi is blameable. Candi is tinned. Rae is unloving. Rae is swingy. Rae is piano. Rae is younger. Rae is tinned. Rae is amative. Leon is unloving. Leon is swingy. Leon is piano. Leon is blameable. If someone is tinned then they are unloving. All swingy people are younger. If someone is unloving then they are swingy. Leon is tinned.", "logic": "\nBlameable(candi)\nTinned(candi)\nUnloving(rae)\nSwingy(rae)\nPiano(rae)\nYounger(rae)\nTinned(rae)\nAmative(rae)\nUnloving(leon)\nSwingy(leon)\nPiano(leon)\nBlameable(leon)\nforall x (Tinned(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Swingy(x) -> Younger(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Swingy(x))\n\nTinned(leon)\n\nTinned(leon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Marrilee is meltable. Marrilee is starved. Tod is obscene. Tod is brainy. Tod is corvine. Tod is astounded. Tod is starved. Tod is pretended. Rudd is obscene. Rudd is brainy. Rudd is corvine. Rudd is meltable. If someone is starved then they are obscene. All brainy people are astounded. If someone is obscene then they are brainy. Marrilee is not corvine.", "logic": "\nMeltable(marrilee)\nStarved(marrilee)\nObscene(tod)\nBrainy(tod)\nCorvine(tod)\nAstounded(tod)\nStarved(tod)\nPretended(tod)\nObscene(rudd)\nBrainy(rudd)\nCorvine(rudd)\nMeltable(rudd)\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Obscene(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) -> Astounded(x))\nforall x (Obscene(x) -> Brainy(x))\n\nnot Corvine(marrilee)\n\nnot Corvine(marrilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Quint is saharan. Quint is misplaced. Dov is lamentable. Dov is duplex. Dov is adhesive. Dov is gushing. Dov is misplaced. Dov is linguistic. Anatola is lamentable. Anatola is duplex. Anatola is adhesive. Anatola is saharan. If someone is misplaced then they are lamentable. All duplex people are gushing. If someone is lamentable then they are duplex. Dov is saharan.", "logic": "\nSaharan(quint)\nMisplaced(quint)\nLamentable(dov)\nDuplex(dov)\nAdhesive(dov)\nGushing(dov)\nMisplaced(dov)\nLinguistic(dov)\nLamentable(anatola)\nDuplex(anatola)\nAdhesive(anatola)\nSaharan(anatola)\nforall x (Misplaced(x) -> Lamentable(x))\nforall x (Duplex(x) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Lamentable(x) -> Duplex(x))\n\nSaharan(dov)\n\nSaharan(dov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "The noland dusk the guillema. The noland is brutish. The guillema abscond the noland. If something dusk the guillema and the guillema abscond the noland then the noland abscond the guillema. If something abscond the guillema then it abscond the noland. If something abscond the noland and the noland is brutish then it accede the noland. The guillema abscond the noland.", "logic": "\nDusk(noland, guillema)\nBrutish(noland)\nAbscond(guillema, noland)\nforall x (Dusk(x, guillema) and Abscond(guillema, noland) -> Abscond(noland, guillema))\nforall x (Abscond(x, guillema) -> Abscond(x, noland))\nforall x (Abscond(x, noland) and Brutish(noland) -> Accede(x, noland))\n\nAbscond(guillema, noland)\n\ntherefore Abscond(guillema, noland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The ginnifer downplay the harrietta. The ginnifer is awol. The harrietta gratify the ginnifer. If something downplay the harrietta and the harrietta gratify the ginnifer then the ginnifer gratify the harrietta. If something gratify the harrietta then it gratify the ginnifer. If something gratify the ginnifer and the ginnifer is awol then it idolise the ginnifer. The harrietta does not need the ginnifer.", "logic": "\nDownplay(ginnifer, harrietta)\nAwol(ginnifer)\nGratify(harrietta, ginnifer)\nforall x (Downplay(x, harrietta) and Gratify(harrietta, ginnifer) -> Gratify(ginnifer, harrietta))\nforall x (Gratify(x, harrietta) -> Gratify(x, ginnifer))\nforall x (Gratify(x, ginnifer) and Awol(ginnifer) -> Idolise(x, ginnifer))\n\nnot Gratify(harrietta, ginnifer)\n\ntherefore Gratify(harrietta, ginnifer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The flower verse the deonne. The flower is tasseled. The deonne bawl the flower. If something verse the deonne and the deonne bawl the flower then the flower bawl the deonne. If something bawl the deonne then it bawl the flower. If something bawl the flower and the flower is tasseled then it homestead the flower. The flower bawl the deonne.", "logic": "\nVerse(flower, deonne)\nTasseled(flower)\nBawl(deonne, flower)\nforall x (Verse(x, deonne) and Bawl(deonne, flower) -> Bawl(flower, deonne))\nforall x (Bawl(x, deonne) -> Bawl(x, flower))\nforall x (Bawl(x, flower) and Tasseled(flower) -> Homestead(x, flower))\n\nBawl(flower, deonne)\n\nVerse(flower, deonne) and Bawl(deonne, flower) and forall x (Verse(x, deonne) and Bawl(deonne, flower) -> Bawl(flower, deonne)) -> therefore Bawl(flower, deonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The alfie ensnarl the hermione. The alfie is undesirous. The hermione hinder the alfie. If something ensnarl the hermione and the hermione hinder the alfie then the alfie hinder the hermione. If something hinder the hermione then it hinder the alfie. If something hinder the alfie and the alfie is undesirous then it acquit the alfie. The alfie does not need the hermione.", "logic": "\nEnsnarl(alfie, hermione)\nUndesirous(alfie)\nHinder(hermione, alfie)\nforall x (Ensnarl(x, hermione) and Hinder(hermione, alfie) -> Hinder(alfie, hermione))\nforall x (Hinder(x, hermione) -> Hinder(x, alfie))\nforall x (Hinder(x, alfie) and Undesirous(alfie) -> Acquit(x, alfie))\n\nnot Hinder(alfie, hermione)\n\nEnsnarl(alfie, hermione) and Hinder(hermione, alfie) and forall x (Ensnarl(x, hermione) and Hinder(hermione, alfie) -> Hinder(alfie, hermione)) -> therefore Hinder(alfie, hermione)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The marylinda cognise the johannes. The marylinda is principled. The johannes redispose the marylinda. If something cognise the johannes and the johannes redispose the marylinda then the marylinda redispose the johannes. If something redispose the johannes then it redispose the marylinda. If something redispose the marylinda and the marylinda is principled then it jibe the marylinda. The marylinda redispose the marylinda.", "logic": "\nCognise(marylinda, johannes)\nPrincipled(marylinda)\nRedispose(johannes, marylinda)\nforall x (Cognise(x, johannes) and Redispose(johannes, marylinda) -> Redispose(marylinda, johannes))\nforall x (Redispose(x, johannes) -> Redispose(x, marylinda))\nforall x (Redispose(x, marylinda) and Principled(marylinda) -> Jibe(x, marylinda))\n\nRedispose(marylinda, marylinda)\n\nCognise(marylinda, johannes) and Redispose(johannes, marylinda) and forall x (Cognise(x, johannes) and Redispose(johannes, marylinda) -> Redispose(marylinda, johannes)) -> therefore Redispose(marylinda, johannes) Redispose(marylinda, johannes) and forall x (Redispose(x, johannes) -> Redispose(x, marylinda)) -> therefore Redispose(marylinda, marylinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The roderigo homologize the elayne. The roderigo is miffed. The elayne devil the roderigo. If something homologize the elayne and the elayne devil the roderigo then the roderigo devil the elayne. If something devil the elayne then it devil the roderigo. If something devil the roderigo and the roderigo is miffed then it bear the roderigo. The roderigo does not need the roderigo.", "logic": "\nHomologize(roderigo, elayne)\nMiffed(roderigo)\nDevil(elayne, roderigo)\nforall x (Homologize(x, elayne) and Devil(elayne, roderigo) -> Devil(roderigo, elayne))\nforall x (Devil(x, elayne) -> Devil(x, roderigo))\nforall x (Devil(x, roderigo) and Miffed(roderigo) -> Bear(x, roderigo))\n\nnot Devil(roderigo, roderigo)\n\nHomologize(roderigo, elayne) and Devil(elayne, roderigo) and forall x (Homologize(x, elayne) and Devil(elayne, roderigo) -> Devil(roderigo, elayne)) -> therefore Devil(roderigo, elayne) Devil(roderigo, elayne) and forall x (Devil(x, elayne) -> Devil(x, roderigo)) -> therefore Devil(roderigo, roderigo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The slade tittivate the clea. The slade is amebic. The clea google the slade. If something tittivate the clea and the clea google the slade then the slade google the clea. If something google the clea then it google the slade. If something google the slade and the slade is amebic then it funnel the slade. The slade funnel the slade.", "logic": "\nTittivate(slade, clea)\nAmebic(slade)\nGoogle(clea, slade)\nforall x (Tittivate(x, clea) and Google(clea, slade) -> Google(slade, clea))\nforall x (Google(x, clea) -> Google(x, slade))\nforall x (Google(x, slade) and Amebic(slade) -> Funnel(x, slade))\n\nFunnel(slade, slade)\n\nTittivate(slade, clea) and Google(clea, slade) and forall x (Tittivate(x, clea) and Google(clea, slade) -> Google(slade, clea)) -> therefore Google(slade, clea) Google(slade, clea) and forall x (Google(x, clea) -> Google(x, slade)) -> therefore Google(slade, slade) Google(slade, slade) and Amebic(slade) and forall x (Google(x, slade) and Amebic(slade) -> Funnel(x, slade)) -> therefore Funnel(slade, slade)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The kourtney swamp the beth. The kourtney is anginose. The beth throb the kourtney. If something swamp the beth and the beth throb the kourtney then the kourtney throb the beth. If something throb the beth then it throb the kourtney. If something throb the kourtney and the kourtney is anginose then it readjust the kourtney. The kourtney does not see the kourtney.", "logic": "\nSwamp(kourtney, beth)\nAnginose(kourtney)\nThrob(beth, kourtney)\nforall x (Swamp(x, beth) and Throb(beth, kourtney) -> Throb(kourtney, beth))\nforall x (Throb(x, beth) -> Throb(x, kourtney))\nforall x (Throb(x, kourtney) and Anginose(kourtney) -> Readjust(x, kourtney))\n\nnot Readjust(kourtney, kourtney)\n\nSwamp(kourtney, beth) and Throb(beth, kourtney) and forall x (Swamp(x, beth) and Throb(beth, kourtney) -> Throb(kourtney, beth)) -> therefore Throb(kourtney, beth) Throb(kourtney, beth) and forall x (Throb(x, beth) -> Throb(x, kourtney)) -> therefore Throb(kourtney, kourtney) Throb(kourtney, kourtney) and Anginose(kourtney) and forall x (Throb(x, kourtney) and Anginose(kourtney) -> Readjust(x, kourtney)) -> therefore Readjust(kourtney, kourtney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The hewie stencil the brita. The hewie is aortal. The brita festinate the hewie. If something stencil the brita and the brita festinate the hewie then the hewie festinate the brita. If something festinate the brita then it festinate the hewie. If something festinate the hewie and the hewie is aortal then it endure the hewie. The brita does not chase the hewie.", "logic": "\nStencil(hewie, brita)\nAortal(hewie)\nFestinate(brita, hewie)\nforall x (Stencil(x, brita) and Festinate(brita, hewie) -> Festinate(hewie, brita))\nforall x (Festinate(x, brita) -> Festinate(x, hewie))\nforall x (Festinate(x, hewie) and Aortal(hewie) -> Endure(x, hewie))\n\nnot Stencil(brita, hewie)\n\nnot Stencil(brita, hewie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The kitti inquire the flint. The kitti is gingival. The flint globalise the kitti. If something inquire the flint and the flint globalise the kitti then the kitti globalise the flint. If something globalise the flint then it globalise the kitti. If something globalise the kitti and the kitti is gingival then it afford the kitti. The flint is young.", "logic": "\nInquire(kitti, flint)\nGingival(kitti)\nGlobalise(flint, kitti)\nforall x (Inquire(x, flint) and Globalise(flint, kitti) -> Globalise(kitti, flint))\nforall x (Globalise(x, flint) -> Globalise(x, kitti))\nforall x (Globalise(x, kitti) and Gingival(kitti) -> Afford(x, kitti))\n\nYoung(flint)\n\nYoung(flint) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The filide obtrude the prent. The filide is stonelike. The prent depute the filide. If something obtrude the prent and the prent depute the filide then the filide depute the prent. If something depute the prent then it depute the filide. If something depute the filide and the filide is stonelike then it bore the filide. The filide is not young.", "logic": "\nObtrude(filide, prent)\nStonelike(filide)\nDepute(prent, filide)\nforall x (Obtrude(x, prent) and Depute(prent, filide) -> Depute(filide, prent))\nforall x (Depute(x, prent) -> Depute(x, filide))\nforall x (Depute(x, filide) and Stonelike(filide) -> Bore(x, filide))\n\nnot Young(filide)\n\nnot Young(filide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The lian crucify the albertine. The lian is fabulous. The albertine evaporate the lian. If something crucify the albertine and the albertine evaporate the lian then the lian evaporate the albertine. If something evaporate the albertine then it evaporate the lian. If something evaporate the lian and the lian is fabulous then it vagabond the lian. The albertine vagabond the albertine.", "logic": "\nCrucify(lian, albertine)\nFabulous(lian)\nEvaporate(albertine, lian)\nforall x (Crucify(x, albertine) and Evaporate(albertine, lian) -> Evaporate(lian, albertine))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, albertine) -> Evaporate(x, lian))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, lian) and Fabulous(lian) -> Vagabond(x, lian))\n\nVagabond(albertine, albertine)\n\nVagabond(albertine, albertine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The melanie playact the barrie. The melanie is glum. The barrie thwack the melanie. If something playact the barrie and the barrie thwack the melanie then the melanie thwack the barrie. If something thwack the barrie then it thwack the melanie. If something thwack the melanie and the melanie is glum then it sojourn the melanie. The melanie does not see the barrie.", "logic": "\nPlayact(melanie, barrie)\nGlum(melanie)\nThwack(barrie, melanie)\nforall x (Playact(x, barrie) and Thwack(barrie, melanie) -> Thwack(melanie, barrie))\nforall x (Thwack(x, barrie) -> Thwack(x, melanie))\nforall x (Thwack(x, melanie) and Glum(melanie) -> Sojourn(x, melanie))\n\nnot Sojourn(melanie, barrie)\n\nnot Sojourn(melanie, barrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The gerhard besot the karlen. The gerhard is incitive. The karlen ginger the gerhard. If something besot the karlen and the karlen ginger the gerhard then the gerhard ginger the karlen. If something ginger the karlen then it ginger the gerhard. If something ginger the gerhard and the gerhard is incitive then it moan the gerhard. The gerhard is green.", "logic": "\nBesot(gerhard, karlen)\nIncitive(gerhard)\nGinger(karlen, gerhard)\nforall x (Besot(x, karlen) and Ginger(karlen, gerhard) -> Ginger(gerhard, karlen))\nforall x (Ginger(x, karlen) -> Ginger(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Ginger(x, gerhard) and Incitive(gerhard) -> Moan(x, gerhard))\n\nGreen(gerhard)\n\nGreen(gerhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The cherlyn infatuate the debora. The cherlyn is eleventh. The debora gnarl the cherlyn. If something infatuate the debora and the debora gnarl the cherlyn then the cherlyn gnarl the debora. If something gnarl the debora then it gnarl the cherlyn. If something gnarl the cherlyn and the cherlyn is eleventh then it butcher the cherlyn. The debora is not green.", "logic": "\nInfatuate(cherlyn, debora)\nEleventh(cherlyn)\nGnarl(debora, cherlyn)\nforall x (Infatuate(x, debora) and Gnarl(debora, cherlyn) -> Gnarl(cherlyn, debora))\nforall x (Gnarl(x, debora) -> Gnarl(x, cherlyn))\nforall x (Gnarl(x, cherlyn) and Eleventh(cherlyn) -> Butcher(x, cherlyn))\n\nnot Green(debora)\n\nnot Green(debora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The angeline reflect the netty. The angeline is anxious. The netty coconspire the angeline. If something reflect the netty and the netty coconspire the angeline then the angeline coconspire the netty. If something coconspire the netty then it coconspire the angeline. If something coconspire the angeline and the angeline is anxious then it tint the angeline. The netty is big.", "logic": "\nReflect(angeline, netty)\nAnxious(angeline)\nCoconspire(netty, angeline)\nforall x (Reflect(x, netty) and Coconspire(netty, angeline) -> Coconspire(angeline, netty))\nforall x (Coconspire(x, netty) -> Coconspire(x, angeline))\nforall x (Coconspire(x, angeline) and Anxious(angeline) -> Tint(x, angeline))\n\nBig(netty)\n\nBig(netty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "Valentia is not festal. Georgine is postexilic. Roosevelt is abhorrent. If something is ambrosian and sauteed then it is festal. If something is postexilic and festal then it is sauteed. If something is abhorrent then it is sauteed. If something is festal and postexilic then it is not studious. If something is abhorrent then it is ambrosian. If Roosevelt is sauteed then Roosevelt is postexilic. Valentia is not festal.", "logic": "\nnot Festal(valentia)\nPostexilic(georgine)\nAbhorrent(roosevelt)\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) and Sauteed(x) -> Festal(x))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) and Festal(x) -> Sauteed(x))\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) -> Sauteed(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and Postexilic(x) -> not Studious(x))\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nSauteed(roosevelt) -> Postexilic(roosevelt)\n\nnot Festal(valentia)\n\ntherefore not Festal(valentia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Mortimer is not epizootic. Hebert is unranked. West is dexter. If something is mangey and masculine then it is epizootic. If something is unranked and epizootic then it is masculine. If something is dexter then it is masculine. If something is epizootic and unranked then it is not passee. If something is dexter then it is mangey. If West is masculine then West is unranked. Mortimer is epizootic.", "logic": "\nnot Epizootic(mortimer)\nUnranked(hebert)\nDexter(west)\nforall x (Mangey(x) and Masculine(x) -> Epizootic(x))\nforall x (Unranked(x) and Epizootic(x) -> Masculine(x))\nforall x (Dexter(x) -> Masculine(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) and Unranked(x) -> not Passee(x))\nforall x (Dexter(x) -> Mangey(x))\nMasculine(west) -> Unranked(west)\n\nEpizootic(mortimer)\n\ntherefore not Epizootic(mortimer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Jacob is not tatty. Aguste is befuddled. Markus is cunning. If something is hourly and carthusian then it is tatty. If something is befuddled and tatty then it is carthusian. If something is cunning then it is carthusian. If something is tatty and befuddled then it is not dermal. If something is cunning then it is hourly. If Markus is carthusian then Markus is befuddled. Markus is carthusian.", "logic": "\nnot Tatty(jacob)\nBefuddled(aguste)\nCunning(markus)\nforall x (Hourly(x) and Carthusian(x) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Befuddled(x) and Tatty(x) -> Carthusian(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Carthusian(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) and Befuddled(x) -> not Dermal(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Hourly(x))\nCarthusian(markus) -> Befuddled(markus)\n\nCarthusian(markus)\n\nCunning(markus) and forall x (Cunning(x) -> Carthusian(x)) -> therefore Carthusian(markus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Sheba is not monolithic. Ruthie is rampant. Nell is spendable. If something is incitive and impuissant then it is monolithic. If something is rampant and monolithic then it is impuissant. If something is spendable then it is impuissant. If something is monolithic and rampant then it is not penetrable. If something is spendable then it is incitive. If Nell is impuissant then Nell is rampant. Nell is not incitive.", "logic": "\nnot Monolithic(sheba)\nRampant(ruthie)\nSpendable(nell)\nforall x (Incitive(x) and Impuissant(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Rampant(x) and Monolithic(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Monolithic(x) and Rampant(x) -> not Penetrable(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Incitive(x))\nImpuissant(nell) -> Rampant(nell)\n\nnot Incitive(nell)\n\nSpendable(nell) and forall x (Spendable(x) -> Incitive(x)) -> therefore Incitive(nell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Oneida is not bulging. Gabrila is bimotored. Daryn is belarusian. If something is some and octuple then it is bulging. If something is bimotored and bulging then it is octuple. If something is belarusian then it is octuple. If something is bulging and bimotored then it is not unhealthy. If something is belarusian then it is some. If Daryn is octuple then Daryn is bimotored. Daryn is bimotored.", "logic": "\nnot Bulging(oneida)\nBimotored(gabrila)\nBelarusian(daryn)\nforall x (Some(x) and Octuple(x) -> Bulging(x))\nforall x (Bimotored(x) and Bulging(x) -> Octuple(x))\nforall x (Belarusian(x) -> Octuple(x))\nforall x (Bulging(x) and Bimotored(x) -> not Unhealthy(x))\nforall x (Belarusian(x) -> Some(x))\nOctuple(daryn) -> Bimotored(daryn)\n\nBimotored(daryn)\n\nBelarusian(daryn) and forall x (Belarusian(x) -> Octuple(x)) -> therefore Octuple(daryn) Octuple(daryn) and Octuple(daryn) -> Bimotored(daryn) -> therefore Bimotored(daryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Izabel is not pyknic. Vivie is tonic. Debera is huxleian. If something is unbelted and macro then it is pyknic. If something is tonic and pyknic then it is macro. If something is huxleian then it is macro. If something is pyknic and tonic then it is not ruffled. If something is huxleian then it is unbelted. If Debera is macro then Debera is tonic. Debera is not tonic.", "logic": "\nnot Pyknic(izabel)\nTonic(vivie)\nHuxleian(debera)\nforall x (Unbelted(x) and Macro(x) -> Pyknic(x))\nforall x (Tonic(x) and Pyknic(x) -> Macro(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Macro(x))\nforall x (Pyknic(x) and Tonic(x) -> not Ruffled(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Unbelted(x))\nMacro(debera) -> Tonic(debera)\n\nnot Tonic(debera)\n\nHuxleian(debera) and forall x (Huxleian(x) -> Macro(x)) -> therefore Macro(debera) Macro(debera) and Macro(debera) -> Tonic(debera) -> therefore Tonic(debera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Oleg is not coniferous. Lebbie is entangled. Jaynell is noticeable. If something is ponderous and digitate then it is coniferous. If something is entangled and coniferous then it is digitate. If something is noticeable then it is digitate. If something is coniferous and entangled then it is not sympatric. If something is noticeable then it is ponderous. If Jaynell is digitate then Jaynell is entangled. Jaynell is not sympatric.", "logic": "\nnot Coniferous(oleg)\nEntangled(lebbie)\nNoticeable(jaynell)\nforall x (Ponderous(x) and Digitate(x) -> Coniferous(x))\nforall x (Entangled(x) and Coniferous(x) -> Digitate(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Digitate(x))\nforall x (Coniferous(x) and Entangled(x) -> not Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Ponderous(x))\nDigitate(jaynell) -> Entangled(jaynell)\n\nnot Sympatric(jaynell)\n\nNoticeable(jaynell) and forall x (Noticeable(x) -> Ponderous(x)) -> therefore Ponderous(jaynell) Noticeable(jaynell) and forall x (Noticeable(x) -> Digitate(x)) -> therefore Digitate(jaynell) Ponderous(jaynell) and Digitate(jaynell) and forall x (Ponderous(x) and Digitate(x) -> Coniferous(x)) -> therefore Coniferous(jaynell) Noticeable(jaynell) and forall x (Noticeable(x) -> Digitate(x)) -> therefore Digitate(jaynell) Digitate(jaynell) and Digitate(jaynell) -> Entangled(jaynell) -> therefore Entangled(jaynell) Coniferous(jaynell) and Entangled(jaynell) and forall x (Coniferous(x) and Entangled(x) -> not Sympatric(x)) -> therefore not Sympatric(jaynell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Gracie is not loathsome. Kenny is goosy. Ettie is flighted. If something is veiled and lxvii then it is loathsome. If something is goosy and loathsome then it is lxvii. If something is flighted then it is lxvii. If something is loathsome and goosy then it is not greenhouse. If something is flighted then it is veiled. If Ettie is lxvii then Ettie is goosy. Ettie is greenhouse.", "logic": "\nnot Loathsome(gracie)\nGoosy(kenny)\nFlighted(ettie)\nforall x (Veiled(x) and Lxvii(x) -> Loathsome(x))\nforall x (Goosy(x) and Loathsome(x) -> Lxvii(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) -> Lxvii(x))\nforall x (Loathsome(x) and Goosy(x) -> not Greenhouse(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) -> Veiled(x))\nLxvii(ettie) -> Goosy(ettie)\n\nGreenhouse(ettie)\n\nFlighted(ettie) and forall x (Flighted(x) -> Veiled(x)) -> therefore Veiled(ettie) Flighted(ettie) and forall x (Flighted(x) -> Lxvii(x)) -> therefore Lxvii(ettie) Veiled(ettie) and Lxvii(ettie) and forall x (Veiled(x) and Lxvii(x) -> Loathsome(x)) -> therefore Loathsome(ettie) Flighted(ettie) and forall x (Flighted(x) -> Lxvii(x)) -> therefore Lxvii(ettie) Lxvii(ettie) and Lxvii(ettie) -> Goosy(ettie) -> therefore Goosy(ettie) Loathsome(ettie) and Goosy(ettie) and forall x (Loathsome(x) and Goosy(x) -> not Greenhouse(x)) -> therefore not Greenhouse(ettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Lenette is not numinous. Joelie is overgrown. Mathias is protean. If something is inhibitory and handleless then it is numinous. If something is overgrown and numinous then it is handleless. If something is protean then it is handleless. If something is numinous and overgrown then it is not avascular. If something is protean then it is inhibitory. If Mathias is handleless then Mathias is overgrown. Joelie is not inhibitory.", "logic": "\nnot Numinous(lenette)\nOvergrown(joelie)\nProtean(mathias)\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) and Handleless(x) -> Numinous(x))\nforall x (Overgrown(x) and Numinous(x) -> Handleless(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) -> Handleless(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) and Overgrown(x) -> not Avascular(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) -> Inhibitory(x))\nHandleless(mathias) -> Overgrown(mathias)\n\nnot Inhibitory(joelie)\n\nforall x (Protean(x) -> Inhibitory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Debra is not permeative. Mariana is bumpkinly. Tracie is odourless. If something is ineffable and throwback then it is permeative. If something is bumpkinly and permeative then it is throwback. If something is odourless then it is throwback. If something is permeative and bumpkinly then it is not steady. If something is odourless then it is ineffable. If Tracie is throwback then Tracie is bumpkinly. Debra is ineffable.", "logic": "\nnot Permeative(debra)\nBumpkinly(mariana)\nOdourless(tracie)\nforall x (Ineffable(x) and Throwback(x) -> Permeative(x))\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) and Permeative(x) -> Throwback(x))\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Throwback(x))\nforall x (Permeative(x) and Bumpkinly(x) -> not Steady(x))\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Ineffable(x))\nThrowback(tracie) -> Bumpkinly(tracie)\n\nIneffable(debra)\n\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Ineffable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Maggie is not untried. Linda is sarcoid. Danyette is endoergic. If something is nighted and disabling then it is untried. If something is sarcoid and untried then it is disabling. If something is endoergic then it is disabling. If something is untried and sarcoid then it is not uveal. If something is endoergic then it is nighted. If Danyette is disabling then Danyette is sarcoid. Linda is not untried.", "logic": "\nnot Untried(maggie)\nSarcoid(linda)\nEndoergic(danyette)\nforall x (Nighted(x) and Disabling(x) -> Untried(x))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) and Untried(x) -> Disabling(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> Disabling(x))\nforall x (Untried(x) and Sarcoid(x) -> not Uveal(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> Nighted(x))\nDisabling(danyette) -> Sarcoid(danyette)\n\nnot Untried(linda)\n\nforall x (Nighted(x) and Disabling(x) -> Untried(x)) <- forall x (Endoergic(x) -> Nighted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Trude is not unsnarled. Pier is divided. Chloe is lxiii. If something is timed and unbroken then it is unsnarled. If something is divided and unsnarled then it is unbroken. If something is lxiii then it is unbroken. If something is unsnarled and divided then it is not armoured. If something is lxiii then it is timed. If Chloe is unbroken then Chloe is divided. Pier is unbroken.", "logic": "\nnot Unsnarled(trude)\nDivided(pier)\nLxiii(chloe)\nforall x (Timed(x) and Unbroken(x) -> Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Unsnarled(x) -> Unbroken(x))\nforall x (Lxiii(x) -> Unbroken(x))\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) and Divided(x) -> not Armoured(x))\nforall x (Lxiii(x) -> Timed(x))\nUnbroken(chloe) -> Divided(chloe)\n\nUnbroken(pier)\n\nforall x (Divided(x) and Unsnarled(x) -> Unbroken(x)) <- forall x (Timed(x) and Unbroken(x) -> Unsnarled(x)) <- forall x (Lxiii(x) -> Timed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Perry is not parous. Silva is bodacious. Esau is healthful. If something is exogamous and stemmed then it is parous. If something is bodacious and parous then it is stemmed. If something is healthful then it is stemmed. If something is parous and bodacious then it is not fretful. If something is healthful then it is exogamous. If Esau is stemmed then Esau is bodacious. Perry is not green.", "logic": "\nnot Parous(perry)\nBodacious(silva)\nHealthful(esau)\nforall x (Exogamous(x) and Stemmed(x) -> Parous(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and Parous(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Parous(x) and Bodacious(x) -> not Fretful(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nStemmed(esau) -> Bodacious(esau)\n\nnot Green(perry)\n\nnot Green(perry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Gabe is not centralist. Ianthe is hermitic. Royce is aching. If something is parisian and upstream then it is centralist. If something is hermitic and centralist then it is upstream. If something is aching then it is upstream. If something is centralist and hermitic then it is not endogamous. If something is aching then it is parisian. If Royce is upstream then Royce is hermitic. Ianthe is green.", "logic": "\nnot Centralist(gabe)\nHermitic(ianthe)\nAching(royce)\nforall x (Parisian(x) and Upstream(x) -> Centralist(x))\nforall x (Hermitic(x) and Centralist(x) -> Upstream(x))\nforall x (Aching(x) -> Upstream(x))\nforall x (Centralist(x) and Hermitic(x) -> not Endogamous(x))\nforall x (Aching(x) -> Parisian(x))\nUpstream(royce) -> Hermitic(royce)\n\nGreen(ianthe)\n\nGreen(ianthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Genni is not cozy. Carlo is umbilical. Wallie is isolated. If something is spiked and decided then it is cozy. If something is umbilical and cozy then it is decided. If something is isolated then it is decided. If something is cozy and umbilical then it is not passant. If something is isolated then it is spiked. If Wallie is decided then Wallie is umbilical. Genni is not passant.", "logic": "\nnot Cozy(genni)\nUmbilical(carlo)\nIsolated(wallie)\nforall x (Spiked(x) and Decided(x) -> Cozy(x))\nforall x (Umbilical(x) and Cozy(x) -> Decided(x))\nforall x (Isolated(x) -> Decided(x))\nforall x (Cozy(x) and Umbilical(x) -> not Passant(x))\nforall x (Isolated(x) -> Spiked(x))\nDecided(wallie) -> Umbilical(wallie)\n\nnot Passant(genni)\n\nnot Passant(genni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Rex is not dickey. Blinni is inviting. Kathie is underslung. If something is fanatic and abloom then it is dickey. If something is inviting and dickey then it is abloom. If something is underslung then it is abloom. If something is dickey and inviting then it is not stylistic. If something is underslung then it is fanatic. If Kathie is abloom then Kathie is inviting. Kathie is green.", "logic": "\nnot Dickey(rex)\nInviting(blinni)\nUnderslung(kathie)\nforall x (Fanatic(x) and Abloom(x) -> Dickey(x))\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Dickey(x) -> Abloom(x))\nforall x (Underslung(x) -> Abloom(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) and Inviting(x) -> not Stylistic(x))\nforall x (Underslung(x) -> Fanatic(x))\nAbloom(kathie) -> Inviting(kathie)\n\nGreen(kathie)\n\nGreen(kathie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Gwyneth is overarm. Gwyneth is plaguey. Matias is not plaguey. Matias is vascular. Matias is not concealing. Cari is overarm. Cari is priestlike. Betsy is twisty. Betsy is vascular. Betsy is concealing. Blue, overarm things are not twisty. All plaguey things are unfocused. If something is plaguey and not priestlike then it is not overarm. All priestlike things are vascular. Young things are vascular. If Betsy is vascular and Betsy is priestlike then Betsy is plaguey. All plaguey, twisty things are not concealing. If Cari is vascular then Cari is plaguey. Matias is not concealing.", "logic": "\nOverarm(gwyneth)\nPlaguey(gwyneth)\nnot Plaguey(matias)\nVascular(matias)\nnot Concealing(matias)\nOverarm(cari)\nPriestlike(cari)\nTwisty(betsy)\nVascular(betsy)\nConcealing(betsy)\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Overarm(x) -> not Twisty(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) -> Unfocused(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) and not Priestlike(x) -> not Overarm(x))\nforall x (Priestlike(x) -> Vascular(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Vascular(x))\nVascular(betsy) and Priestlike(betsy) -> Plaguey(betsy)\nforall x (Plaguey(x) and Twisty(x) -> not Concealing(x))\nVascular(cari) -> Plaguey(cari)\n\nnot Concealing(matias)\n\ntherefore not Concealing(matias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Velvet is axile. Velvet is grimy. Mercie is not grimy. Mercie is resurgent. Mercie is not cloistral. Roselle is axile. Roselle is uveal. Vannie is divorced. Vannie is resurgent. Vannie is cloistral. Blue, axile things are not divorced. All grimy things are nourishing. If something is grimy and not uveal then it is not axile. All uveal things are resurgent. Young things are resurgent. If Vannie is resurgent and Vannie is uveal then Vannie is grimy. All grimy, divorced things are not cloistral. If Roselle is resurgent then Roselle is grimy. Vannie is not resurgent.", "logic": "\nAxile(velvet)\nGrimy(velvet)\nnot Grimy(mercie)\nResurgent(mercie)\nnot Cloistral(mercie)\nAxile(roselle)\nUveal(roselle)\nDivorced(vannie)\nResurgent(vannie)\nCloistral(vannie)\nforall x (Nourishing(x) and Axile(x) -> not Divorced(x))\nforall x (Grimy(x) -> Nourishing(x))\nforall x (Grimy(x) and not Uveal(x) -> not Axile(x))\nforall x (Uveal(x) -> Resurgent(x))\nforall x (Cloistral(x) -> Resurgent(x))\nResurgent(vannie) and Uveal(vannie) -> Grimy(vannie)\nforall x (Grimy(x) and Divorced(x) -> not Cloistral(x))\nResurgent(roselle) -> Grimy(roselle)\n\nnot Resurgent(vannie)\n\ntherefore Resurgent(vannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Nertie is phyletic. Nertie is colorfast. Eliott is not colorfast. Eliott is lacerate. Eliott is not hulking. Bucky is phyletic. Bucky is arable. Sharona is fearless. Sharona is lacerate. Sharona is hulking. Blue, phyletic things are not fearless. All colorfast things are only. If something is colorfast and not arable then it is not phyletic. All arable things are lacerate. Young things are lacerate. If Sharona is lacerate and Sharona is arable then Sharona is colorfast. All colorfast, fearless things are not hulking. If Bucky is lacerate then Bucky is colorfast. Nertie is only.", "logic": "\nPhyletic(nertie)\nColorfast(nertie)\nnot Colorfast(eliott)\nLacerate(eliott)\nnot Hulking(eliott)\nPhyletic(bucky)\nArable(bucky)\nFearless(sharona)\nLacerate(sharona)\nHulking(sharona)\nforall x (Only(x) and Phyletic(x) -> not Fearless(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) -> Only(x))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) and not Arable(x) -> not Phyletic(x))\nforall x (Arable(x) -> Lacerate(x))\nforall x (Hulking(x) -> Lacerate(x))\nLacerate(sharona) and Arable(sharona) -> Colorfast(sharona)\nforall x (Colorfast(x) and Fearless(x) -> not Hulking(x))\nLacerate(bucky) -> Colorfast(bucky)\n\nOnly(nertie)\n\nColorfast(nertie) and forall x (Colorfast(x) -> Only(x)) -> therefore Only(nertie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Matty is improper. Matty is putative. Jackelyn is not putative. Jackelyn is bittie. Jackelyn is not fulsome. Amadeus is improper. Amadeus is extremist. Catharina is godly. Catharina is bittie. Catharina is fulsome. Blue, improper things are not godly. All putative things are mendelian. If something is putative and not extremist then it is not improper. All extremist things are bittie. Young things are bittie. If Catharina is bittie and Catharina is extremist then Catharina is putative. All putative, godly things are not fulsome. If Amadeus is bittie then Amadeus is putative. Matty is not mendelian.", "logic": "\nImproper(matty)\nPutative(matty)\nnot Putative(jackelyn)\nBittie(jackelyn)\nnot Fulsome(jackelyn)\nImproper(amadeus)\nExtremist(amadeus)\nGodly(catharina)\nBittie(catharina)\nFulsome(catharina)\nforall x (Mendelian(x) and Improper(x) -> not Godly(x))\nforall x (Putative(x) -> Mendelian(x))\nforall x (Putative(x) and not Extremist(x) -> not Improper(x))\nforall x (Extremist(x) -> Bittie(x))\nforall x (Fulsome(x) -> Bittie(x))\nBittie(catharina) and Extremist(catharina) -> Putative(catharina)\nforall x (Putative(x) and Godly(x) -> not Fulsome(x))\nBittie(amadeus) -> Putative(amadeus)\n\nnot Mendelian(matty)\n\nPutative(matty) and forall x (Putative(x) -> Mendelian(x)) -> therefore Mendelian(matty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Osmund is waking. Osmund is bahraini. Amalee is not bahraini. Amalee is astomatal. Amalee is not bigger. Shirline is waking. Shirline is sinister. Llewellyn is milled. Llewellyn is astomatal. Llewellyn is bigger. Blue, waking things are not milled. All bahraini things are khaki. If something is bahraini and not sinister then it is not waking. All sinister things are astomatal. Young things are astomatal. If Llewellyn is astomatal and Llewellyn is sinister then Llewellyn is bahraini. All bahraini, milled things are not bigger. If Shirline is astomatal then Shirline is bahraini. Osmund is not milled.", "logic": "\nWaking(osmund)\nBahraini(osmund)\nnot Bahraini(amalee)\nAstomatal(amalee)\nnot Bigger(amalee)\nWaking(shirline)\nSinister(shirline)\nMilled(llewellyn)\nAstomatal(llewellyn)\nBigger(llewellyn)\nforall x (Khaki(x) and Waking(x) -> not Milled(x))\nforall x (Bahraini(x) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Bahraini(x) and not Sinister(x) -> not Waking(x))\nforall x (Sinister(x) -> Astomatal(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Astomatal(x))\nAstomatal(llewellyn) and Sinister(llewellyn) -> Bahraini(llewellyn)\nforall x (Bahraini(x) and Milled(x) -> not Bigger(x))\nAstomatal(shirline) -> Bahraini(shirline)\n\nnot Milled(osmund)\n\nBahraini(osmund) and forall x (Bahraini(x) -> Khaki(x)) -> therefore Khaki(osmund) Khaki(osmund) and Waking(osmund) and forall x (Khaki(x) and Waking(x) -> not Milled(x)) -> therefore not Milled(osmund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Channa is gray. Channa is comburent. Christen is not comburent. Christen is shinto. Christen is not reinforced. Letitia is gray. Letitia is scopal. Boris is exterior. Boris is shinto. Boris is reinforced. Blue, gray things are not exterior. All comburent things are gelatinous. If something is comburent and not scopal then it is not gray. All scopal things are shinto. Young things are shinto. If Boris is shinto and Boris is scopal then Boris is comburent. All comburent, exterior things are not reinforced. If Letitia is shinto then Letitia is comburent. Channa is exterior.", "logic": "\nGray(channa)\nComburent(channa)\nnot Comburent(christen)\nShinto(christen)\nnot Reinforced(christen)\nGray(letitia)\nScopal(letitia)\nExterior(boris)\nShinto(boris)\nReinforced(boris)\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) and Gray(x) -> not Exterior(x))\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> Gelatinous(x))\nforall x (Comburent(x) and not Scopal(x) -> not Gray(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Reinforced(x) -> Shinto(x))\nShinto(boris) and Scopal(boris) -> Comburent(boris)\nforall x (Comburent(x) and Exterior(x) -> not Reinforced(x))\nShinto(letitia) -> Comburent(letitia)\n\nExterior(channa)\n\nComburent(channa) and forall x (Comburent(x) -> Gelatinous(x)) -> therefore Gelatinous(channa) Gelatinous(channa) and Gray(channa) and forall x (Gelatinous(x) and Gray(x) -> not Exterior(x)) -> therefore not Exterior(channa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Ian is distrait. Ian is catechetic. Brandise is not catechetic. Brandise is skimpy. Brandise is not papistic. Goldarina is distrait. Goldarina is apart. Pepita is unposed. Pepita is skimpy. Pepita is papistic. Blue, distrait things are not unposed. All catechetic things are sunlit. If something is catechetic and not apart then it is not distrait. All apart things are skimpy. Young things are skimpy. If Pepita is skimpy and Pepita is apart then Pepita is catechetic. All catechetic, unposed things are not papistic. If Goldarina is skimpy then Goldarina is catechetic. Goldarina is sunlit.", "logic": "\nDistrait(ian)\nCatechetic(ian)\nnot Catechetic(brandise)\nSkimpy(brandise)\nnot Papistic(brandise)\nDistrait(goldarina)\nApart(goldarina)\nUnposed(pepita)\nSkimpy(pepita)\nPapistic(pepita)\nforall x (Sunlit(x) and Distrait(x) -> not Unposed(x))\nforall x (Catechetic(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nforall x (Catechetic(x) and not Apart(x) -> not Distrait(x))\nforall x (Apart(x) -> Skimpy(x))\nforall x (Papistic(x) -> Skimpy(x))\nSkimpy(pepita) and Apart(pepita) -> Catechetic(pepita)\nforall x (Catechetic(x) and Unposed(x) -> not Papistic(x))\nSkimpy(goldarina) -> Catechetic(goldarina)\n\nSunlit(goldarina)\n\nApart(goldarina) and forall x (Apart(x) -> Skimpy(x)) -> therefore Skimpy(goldarina) Skimpy(goldarina) and Skimpy(goldarina) -> Catechetic(goldarina) -> therefore Catechetic(goldarina) Catechetic(goldarina) and forall x (Catechetic(x) -> Sunlit(x)) -> therefore Sunlit(goldarina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Mable is liveried. Mable is anaerobic. Dru is not anaerobic. Dru is standpat. Dru is not unswerving. Madella is liveried. Madella is scriptural. Mildrid is vulnerable. Mildrid is standpat. Mildrid is unswerving. Blue, liveried things are not vulnerable. All anaerobic things are pulmonary. If something is anaerobic and not scriptural then it is not liveried. All scriptural things are standpat. Young things are standpat. If Mildrid is standpat and Mildrid is scriptural then Mildrid is anaerobic. All anaerobic, vulnerable things are not unswerving. If Madella is standpat then Madella is anaerobic. Madella is not pulmonary.", "logic": "\nLiveried(mable)\nAnaerobic(mable)\nnot Anaerobic(dru)\nStandpat(dru)\nnot Unswerving(dru)\nLiveried(madella)\nScriptural(madella)\nVulnerable(mildrid)\nStandpat(mildrid)\nUnswerving(mildrid)\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Liveried(x) -> not Vulnerable(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Pulmonary(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) and not Scriptural(x) -> not Liveried(x))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) -> Standpat(x))\nStandpat(mildrid) and Scriptural(mildrid) -> Anaerobic(mildrid)\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) and Vulnerable(x) -> not Unswerving(x))\nStandpat(madella) -> Anaerobic(madella)\n\nnot Pulmonary(madella)\n\nScriptural(madella) and forall x (Scriptural(x) -> Standpat(x)) -> therefore Standpat(madella) Standpat(madella) and Standpat(madella) -> Anaerobic(madella) -> therefore Anaerobic(madella) Anaerobic(madella) and forall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Pulmonary(x)) -> therefore Pulmonary(madella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Juanita is sugary. Juanita is alleged. Abner is not alleged. Abner is untaped. Abner is not maddening. Jackelyn is sugary. Jackelyn is manual. Godfree is unuttered. Godfree is untaped. Godfree is maddening. Blue, sugary things are not unuttered. All alleged things are fruticose. If something is alleged and not manual then it is not sugary. All manual things are untaped. Young things are untaped. If Godfree is untaped and Godfree is manual then Godfree is alleged. All alleged, unuttered things are not maddening. If Jackelyn is untaped then Jackelyn is alleged. Godfree is not alleged.", "logic": "\nSugary(juanita)\nAlleged(juanita)\nnot Alleged(abner)\nUntaped(abner)\nnot Maddening(abner)\nSugary(jackelyn)\nManual(jackelyn)\nUnuttered(godfree)\nUntaped(godfree)\nMaddening(godfree)\nforall x (Fruticose(x) and Sugary(x) -> not Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Fruticose(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) and not Manual(x) -> not Sugary(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Untaped(x))\nforall x (Maddening(x) -> Untaped(x))\nUntaped(godfree) and Manual(godfree) -> Alleged(godfree)\nforall x (Alleged(x) and Unuttered(x) -> not Maddening(x))\nUntaped(jackelyn) -> Alleged(jackelyn)\n\nnot Alleged(godfree)\n\nUntaped(godfree) and Manual(godfree) -> Alleged(godfree) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Bernhard is squealing. Bernhard is tasteless. Karil is not tasteless. Karil is repellent. Karil is not shoddy. Tildy is squealing. Tildy is tantrik. Naomi is undreamt. Naomi is repellent. Naomi is shoddy. Blue, squealing things are not undreamt. All tasteless things are unwounded. If something is tasteless and not tantrik then it is not squealing. All tantrik things are repellent. Young things are repellent. If Naomi is repellent and Naomi is tantrik then Naomi is tasteless. All tasteless, undreamt things are not shoddy. If Tildy is repellent then Tildy is tasteless. Naomi is unwounded.", "logic": "\nSquealing(bernhard)\nTasteless(bernhard)\nnot Tasteless(karil)\nRepellent(karil)\nnot Shoddy(karil)\nSquealing(tildy)\nTantrik(tildy)\nUndreamt(naomi)\nRepellent(naomi)\nShoddy(naomi)\nforall x (Unwounded(x) and Squealing(x) -> not Undreamt(x))\nforall x (Tasteless(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Tasteless(x) and not Tantrik(x) -> not Squealing(x))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) -> Repellent(x))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> Repellent(x))\nRepellent(naomi) and Tantrik(naomi) -> Tasteless(naomi)\nforall x (Tasteless(x) and Undreamt(x) -> not Shoddy(x))\nRepellent(tildy) -> Tasteless(tildy)\n\nUnwounded(naomi)\n\nforall x (Tasteless(x) -> Unwounded(x)) <- Repellent(naomi) and Tantrik(naomi) -> Tasteless(naomi) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Karlen is aching. Karlen is exalted. Lind is not exalted. Lind is bimanual. Lind is not archducal. Johannes is aching. Johannes is pompous. Ivy is asinine. Ivy is bimanual. Ivy is archducal. Blue, aching things are not asinine. All exalted things are ctenoid. If something is exalted and not pompous then it is not aching. All pompous things are bimanual. Young things are bimanual. If Ivy is bimanual and Ivy is pompous then Ivy is exalted. All exalted, asinine things are not archducal. If Johannes is bimanual then Johannes is exalted. Karlen is not bimanual.", "logic": "\nAching(karlen)\nExalted(karlen)\nnot Exalted(lind)\nBimanual(lind)\nnot Archducal(lind)\nAching(johannes)\nPompous(johannes)\nAsinine(ivy)\nBimanual(ivy)\nArchducal(ivy)\nforall x (Ctenoid(x) and Aching(x) -> not Asinine(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Ctenoid(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) and not Pompous(x) -> not Aching(x))\nforall x (Pompous(x) -> Bimanual(x))\nforall x (Archducal(x) -> Bimanual(x))\nBimanual(ivy) and Pompous(ivy) -> Exalted(ivy)\nforall x (Exalted(x) and Asinine(x) -> not Archducal(x))\nBimanual(johannes) -> Exalted(johannes)\n\nnot Bimanual(karlen)\n\nforall x (Pompous(x) -> Bimanual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Maia is sidelong. Maia is countywide. Sterne is not countywide. Sterne is heritable. Sterne is not fruticose. Gustav is sidelong. Gustav is combed. Suzette is sissy. Suzette is heritable. Suzette is fruticose. Blue, sidelong things are not sissy. All countywide things are retro. If something is countywide and not combed then it is not sidelong. All combed things are heritable. Young things are heritable. If Suzette is heritable and Suzette is combed then Suzette is countywide. All countywide, sissy things are not fruticose. If Gustav is heritable then Gustav is countywide. Sterne is retro.", "logic": "\nSidelong(maia)\nCountywide(maia)\nnot Countywide(sterne)\nHeritable(sterne)\nnot Fruticose(sterne)\nSidelong(gustav)\nCombed(gustav)\nSissy(suzette)\nHeritable(suzette)\nFruticose(suzette)\nforall x (Retro(x) and Sidelong(x) -> not Sissy(x))\nforall x (Countywide(x) -> Retro(x))\nforall x (Countywide(x) and not Combed(x) -> not Sidelong(x))\nforall x (Combed(x) -> Heritable(x))\nforall x (Fruticose(x) -> Heritable(x))\nHeritable(suzette) and Combed(suzette) -> Countywide(suzette)\nforall x (Countywide(x) and Sissy(x) -> not Fruticose(x))\nHeritable(gustav) -> Countywide(gustav)\n\nRetro(sterne)\n\nforall x (Countywide(x) -> Retro(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Marianne is humified. Marianne is rightist. Dyanna is not rightist. Dyanna is torturing. Dyanna is not capital. Derby is humified. Derby is elusive. Erinna is carboxyl. Erinna is torturing. Erinna is capital. Blue, humified things are not carboxyl. All rightist things are fuzzed. If something is rightist and not elusive then it is not humified. All elusive things are torturing. Young things are torturing. If Erinna is torturing and Erinna is elusive then Erinna is rightist. All rightist, carboxyl things are not capital. If Derby is torturing then Derby is rightist. Marianne is not elusive.", "logic": "\nHumified(marianne)\nRightist(marianne)\nnot Rightist(dyanna)\nTorturing(dyanna)\nnot Capital(dyanna)\nHumified(derby)\nElusive(derby)\nCarboxyl(erinna)\nTorturing(erinna)\nCapital(erinna)\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Humified(x) -> not Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Rightist(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Rightist(x) and not Elusive(x) -> not Humified(x))\nforall x (Elusive(x) -> Torturing(x))\nforall x (Capital(x) -> Torturing(x))\nTorturing(erinna) and Elusive(erinna) -> Rightist(erinna)\nforall x (Rightist(x) and Carboxyl(x) -> not Capital(x))\nTorturing(derby) -> Rightist(derby)\n\nnot Elusive(marianne)\n\nnot Elusive(marianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Quinlan is sunstruck. Quinlan is aestival. Raina is not aestival. Raina is antrorse. Raina is not rapacious. Rudolph is sunstruck. Rudolph is samoan. Susana is myotonic. Susana is antrorse. Susana is rapacious. Blue, sunstruck things are not myotonic. All aestival things are erectile. If something is aestival and not samoan then it is not sunstruck. All samoan things are antrorse. Young things are antrorse. If Susana is antrorse and Susana is samoan then Susana is aestival. All aestival, myotonic things are not rapacious. If Rudolph is antrorse then Rudolph is aestival. Raina is myotonic.", "logic": "\nSunstruck(quinlan)\nAestival(quinlan)\nnot Aestival(raina)\nAntrorse(raina)\nnot Rapacious(raina)\nSunstruck(rudolph)\nSamoan(rudolph)\nMyotonic(susana)\nAntrorse(susana)\nRapacious(susana)\nforall x (Erectile(x) and Sunstruck(x) -> not Myotonic(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Erectile(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) and not Samoan(x) -> not Sunstruck(x))\nforall x (Samoan(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nforall x (Rapacious(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nAntrorse(susana) and Samoan(susana) -> Aestival(susana)\nforall x (Aestival(x) and Myotonic(x) -> not Rapacious(x))\nAntrorse(rudolph) -> Aestival(rudolph)\n\nMyotonic(raina)\n\nMyotonic(raina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Royal is cohesive. Royal is subarctic. Dieter is not subarctic. Dieter is iodised. Dieter is not glorified. Tierney is cohesive. Tierney is ascitic. Evvie is sintered. Evvie is iodised. Evvie is glorified. Blue, cohesive things are not sintered. All subarctic things are cockeyed. If something is subarctic and not ascitic then it is not cohesive. All ascitic things are iodised. Young things are iodised. If Evvie is iodised and Evvie is ascitic then Evvie is subarctic. All subarctic, sintered things are not glorified. If Tierney is iodised then Tierney is subarctic. Evvie is not ascitic.", "logic": "\nCohesive(royal)\nSubarctic(royal)\nnot Subarctic(dieter)\nIodised(dieter)\nnot Glorified(dieter)\nCohesive(tierney)\nAscitic(tierney)\nSintered(evvie)\nIodised(evvie)\nGlorified(evvie)\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) and Cohesive(x) -> not Sintered(x))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) -> Cockeyed(x))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and not Ascitic(x) -> not Cohesive(x))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> Iodised(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Iodised(x))\nIodised(evvie) and Ascitic(evvie) -> Subarctic(evvie)\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and Sintered(x) -> not Glorified(x))\nIodised(tierney) -> Subarctic(tierney)\n\nnot Ascitic(evvie)\n\nnot Ascitic(evvie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Angelita is jingly. Angelita is gooselike. Daria is not gooselike. Daria is sharp. Daria is not friendly. Sanford is jingly. Sanford is punishable. Tamar is crenulate. Tamar is sharp. Tamar is friendly. Blue, jingly things are not crenulate. All gooselike things are stunted. If something is gooselike and not punishable then it is not jingly. All punishable things are sharp. Young things are sharp. If Tamar is sharp and Tamar is punishable then Tamar is gooselike. All gooselike, crenulate things are not friendly. If Sanford is sharp then Sanford is gooselike. Daria is jingly.", "logic": "\nJingly(angelita)\nGooselike(angelita)\nnot Gooselike(daria)\nSharp(daria)\nnot Friendly(daria)\nJingly(sanford)\nPunishable(sanford)\nCrenulate(tamar)\nSharp(tamar)\nFriendly(tamar)\nforall x (Stunted(x) and Jingly(x) -> not Crenulate(x))\nforall x (Gooselike(x) -> Stunted(x))\nforall x (Gooselike(x) and not Punishable(x) -> not Jingly(x))\nforall x (Punishable(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Friendly(x) -> Sharp(x))\nSharp(tamar) and Punishable(tamar) -> Gooselike(tamar)\nforall x (Gooselike(x) and Crenulate(x) -> not Friendly(x))\nSharp(sanford) -> Gooselike(sanford)\n\nJingly(daria)\n\nJingly(daria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "The clarinda is numerate. The clarinda is hired. The clarinda is through. The clarinda stomach the jenifer. The clarinda tempt the jenifer. The clarinda surtax the jenifer. The jenifer is beetle. The jenifer is suntanned. The jenifer tempt the clarinda. The jenifer surtax the clarinda. If someone surtax the jenifer then the jenifer stomach the clarinda. If the jenifer tempt the clarinda and the clarinda is hired then the jenifer stomach the clarinda. If someone is suntanned and they see the clarinda then they need the jenifer. If someone surtax the jenifer and the jenifer stomach the clarinda then the clarinda is beetle. If the jenifer surtax the clarinda and the clarinda is numerate then the jenifer is through. If someone is beetle then they need the clarinda. The clarinda is through.", "logic": "\nNumerate(clarinda)\nHired(clarinda)\nThrough(clarinda)\nStomach(clarinda, jenifer)\nTempt(clarinda, jenifer)\nSurtax(clarinda, jenifer)\nBeetle(jenifer)\nSuntanned(jenifer)\nTempt(jenifer, clarinda)\nSurtax(jenifer, clarinda)\nforall x (Surtax(x, jenifer) -> Stomach(jenifer, clarinda))\nTempt(jenifer, clarinda) and Hired(clarinda) -> Stomach(jenifer, clarinda)\nforall x (Suntanned(x) and Tempt(x, clarinda) -> Stomach(x, jenifer))\nforall x (Surtax(x, jenifer) and Stomach(jenifer, clarinda) -> Beetle(clarinda))\nSurtax(jenifer, clarinda) and Numerate(clarinda) -> Through(jenifer)\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Stomach(x, clarinda))\n\nThrough(clarinda)\n\ntherefore Through(clarinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The collins is ceramic. The collins is mucosal. The collins is lacerate. The collins save the erika. The collins fuse the erika. The collins keel the erika. The erika is chary. The erika is brittle. The erika fuse the collins. The erika keel the collins. If someone keel the erika then the erika save the collins. If the erika fuse the collins and the collins is mucosal then the erika save the collins. If someone is brittle and they see the collins then they need the erika. If someone keel the erika and the erika save the collins then the collins is chary. If the erika keel the collins and the collins is ceramic then the erika is lacerate. If someone is chary then they need the collins. The collins does not visit the erika.", "logic": "\nCeramic(collins)\nMucosal(collins)\nLacerate(collins)\nSave(collins, erika)\nFuse(collins, erika)\nKeel(collins, erika)\nChary(erika)\nBrittle(erika)\nFuse(erika, collins)\nKeel(erika, collins)\nforall x (Keel(x, erika) -> Save(erika, collins))\nFuse(erika, collins) and Mucosal(collins) -> Save(erika, collins)\nforall x (Brittle(x) and Fuse(x, collins) -> Save(x, erika))\nforall x (Keel(x, erika) and Save(erika, collins) -> Chary(collins))\nKeel(erika, collins) and Ceramic(collins) -> Lacerate(erika)\nforall x (Chary(x) -> Save(x, collins))\n\nnot Keel(collins, erika)\n\ntherefore Keel(collins, erika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The robinia is subsonic. The robinia is tabular. The robinia is mesenteric. The robinia saddle the ardelle. The robinia rankle the ardelle. The robinia bother the ardelle. The ardelle is copernican. The ardelle is fussy. The ardelle rankle the robinia. The ardelle bother the robinia. If someone bother the ardelle then the ardelle saddle the robinia. If the ardelle rankle the robinia and the robinia is tabular then the ardelle saddle the robinia. If someone is fussy and they see the robinia then they need the ardelle. If someone bother the ardelle and the ardelle saddle the robinia then the robinia is copernican. If the ardelle bother the robinia and the robinia is subsonic then the ardelle is mesenteric. If someone is copernican then they need the robinia. The ardelle saddle the ardelle.", "logic": "\nSubsonic(robinia)\nTabular(robinia)\nMesenteric(robinia)\nSaddle(robinia, ardelle)\nRankle(robinia, ardelle)\nBother(robinia, ardelle)\nCopernican(ardelle)\nFussy(ardelle)\nRankle(ardelle, robinia)\nBother(ardelle, robinia)\nforall x (Bother(x, ardelle) -> Saddle(ardelle, robinia))\nRankle(ardelle, robinia) and Tabular(robinia) -> Saddle(ardelle, robinia)\nforall x (Fussy(x) and Rankle(x, robinia) -> Saddle(x, ardelle))\nforall x (Bother(x, ardelle) and Saddle(ardelle, robinia) -> Copernican(robinia))\nBother(ardelle, robinia) and Subsonic(robinia) -> Mesenteric(ardelle)\nforall x (Copernican(x) -> Saddle(x, robinia))\n\nSaddle(ardelle, ardelle)\n\nFussy(ardelle) and Rankle(ardelle, robinia) and forall x (Fussy(x) and Rankle(x, robinia) -> Saddle(x, ardelle)) -> therefore Saddle(ardelle, ardelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The rubi is toothsome. The rubi is stylistic. The rubi is empty. The rubi supervene the margeaux. The rubi benefit the margeaux. The rubi dulcify the margeaux. The margeaux is carbonated. The margeaux is felicitous. The margeaux benefit the rubi. The margeaux dulcify the rubi. If someone dulcify the margeaux then the margeaux supervene the rubi. If the margeaux benefit the rubi and the rubi is stylistic then the margeaux supervene the rubi. If someone is felicitous and they see the rubi then they need the margeaux. If someone dulcify the margeaux and the margeaux supervene the rubi then the rubi is carbonated. If the margeaux dulcify the rubi and the rubi is toothsome then the margeaux is empty. If someone is carbonated then they need the rubi. The margeaux does not need the rubi.", "logic": "\nToothsome(rubi)\nStylistic(rubi)\nEmpty(rubi)\nSupervene(rubi, margeaux)\nBenefit(rubi, margeaux)\nDulcify(rubi, margeaux)\nCarbonated(margeaux)\nFelicitous(margeaux)\nBenefit(margeaux, rubi)\nDulcify(margeaux, rubi)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, margeaux) -> Supervene(margeaux, rubi))\nBenefit(margeaux, rubi) and Stylistic(rubi) -> Supervene(margeaux, rubi)\nforall x (Felicitous(x) and Benefit(x, rubi) -> Supervene(x, margeaux))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, margeaux) and Supervene(margeaux, rubi) -> Carbonated(rubi))\nDulcify(margeaux, rubi) and Toothsome(rubi) -> Empty(margeaux)\nforall x (Carbonated(x) -> Supervene(x, rubi))\n\nnot Supervene(margeaux, rubi)\n\nDulcify(rubi, margeaux) and forall x (Dulcify(x, margeaux) -> Supervene(margeaux, rubi)) -> therefore Supervene(margeaux, rubi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The jed is attired. The jed is singable. The jed is reverse. The jed comply the alexia. The jed esteem the alexia. The jed exchange the alexia. The alexia is enraptured. The alexia is buzzing. The alexia esteem the jed. The alexia exchange the jed. If someone exchange the alexia then the alexia comply the jed. If the alexia esteem the jed and the jed is singable then the alexia comply the jed. If someone is buzzing and they see the jed then they need the alexia. If someone exchange the alexia and the alexia comply the jed then the jed is enraptured. If the alexia exchange the jed and the jed is attired then the alexia is reverse. If someone is enraptured then they need the jed. The jed is enraptured.", "logic": "\nAttired(jed)\nSingable(jed)\nReverse(jed)\nComply(jed, alexia)\nEsteem(jed, alexia)\nExchange(jed, alexia)\nEnraptured(alexia)\nBuzzing(alexia)\nEsteem(alexia, jed)\nExchange(alexia, jed)\nforall x (Exchange(x, alexia) -> Comply(alexia, jed))\nEsteem(alexia, jed) and Singable(jed) -> Comply(alexia, jed)\nforall x (Buzzing(x) and Esteem(x, jed) -> Comply(x, alexia))\nforall x (Exchange(x, alexia) and Comply(alexia, jed) -> Enraptured(jed))\nExchange(alexia, jed) and Attired(jed) -> Reverse(alexia)\nforall x (Enraptured(x) -> Comply(x, jed))\n\nEnraptured(jed)\n\nExchange(jed, alexia) and forall x (Exchange(x, alexia) -> Comply(alexia, jed)) -> therefore Comply(alexia, jed) Exchange(jed, alexia) and Comply(alexia, jed) and forall x (Exchange(x, alexia) and Comply(alexia, jed) -> Enraptured(jed)) -> therefore Enraptured(jed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The janeta is disclike. The janeta is unswept. The janeta is vinegary. The janeta dissent the townsend. The janeta fantasise the townsend. The janeta audition the townsend. The townsend is converse. The townsend is unsoluble. The townsend fantasise the janeta. The townsend audition the janeta. If someone audition the townsend then the townsend dissent the janeta. If the townsend fantasise the janeta and the janeta is unswept then the townsend dissent the janeta. If someone is unsoluble and they see the janeta then they need the townsend. If someone audition the townsend and the townsend dissent the janeta then the janeta is converse. If the townsend audition the janeta and the janeta is disclike then the townsend is vinegary. If someone is converse then they need the janeta. The janeta is not converse.", "logic": "\nDisclike(janeta)\nUnswept(janeta)\nVinegary(janeta)\nDissent(janeta, townsend)\nFantasise(janeta, townsend)\nAudition(janeta, townsend)\nConverse(townsend)\nUnsoluble(townsend)\nFantasise(townsend, janeta)\nAudition(townsend, janeta)\nforall x (Audition(x, townsend) -> Dissent(townsend, janeta))\nFantasise(townsend, janeta) and Unswept(janeta) -> Dissent(townsend, janeta)\nforall x (Unsoluble(x) and Fantasise(x, janeta) -> Dissent(x, townsend))\nforall x (Audition(x, townsend) and Dissent(townsend, janeta) -> Converse(janeta))\nAudition(townsend, janeta) and Disclike(janeta) -> Vinegary(townsend)\nforall x (Converse(x) -> Dissent(x, janeta))\n\nnot Converse(janeta)\n\nAudition(janeta, townsend) and forall x (Audition(x, townsend) -> Dissent(townsend, janeta)) -> therefore Dissent(townsend, janeta) Audition(janeta, townsend) and Dissent(townsend, janeta) and forall x (Audition(x, townsend) and Dissent(townsend, janeta) -> Converse(janeta)) -> therefore Converse(janeta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The cindie is serbian. The cindie is camp. The cindie is scummy. The cindie bung the andrzej. The cindie bewitch the andrzej. The cindie narcotise the andrzej. The andrzej is articulary. The andrzej is stormbound. The andrzej bewitch the cindie. The andrzej narcotise the cindie. If someone narcotise the andrzej then the andrzej bung the cindie. If the andrzej bewitch the cindie and the cindie is camp then the andrzej bung the cindie. If someone is stormbound and they see the cindie then they need the andrzej. If someone narcotise the andrzej and the andrzej bung the cindie then the cindie is articulary. If the andrzej narcotise the cindie and the cindie is serbian then the andrzej is scummy. If someone is articulary then they need the cindie. The cindie bung the cindie.", "logic": "\nSerbian(cindie)\nCamp(cindie)\nScummy(cindie)\nBung(cindie, andrzej)\nBewitch(cindie, andrzej)\nNarcotise(cindie, andrzej)\nArticulary(andrzej)\nStormbound(andrzej)\nBewitch(andrzej, cindie)\nNarcotise(andrzej, cindie)\nforall x (Narcotise(x, andrzej) -> Bung(andrzej, cindie))\nBewitch(andrzej, cindie) and Camp(cindie) -> Bung(andrzej, cindie)\nforall x (Stormbound(x) and Bewitch(x, cindie) -> Bung(x, andrzej))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, andrzej) and Bung(andrzej, cindie) -> Articulary(cindie))\nNarcotise(andrzej, cindie) and Serbian(cindie) -> Scummy(andrzej)\nforall x (Articulary(x) -> Bung(x, cindie))\n\nBung(cindie, cindie)\n\nNarcotise(cindie, andrzej) and forall x (Narcotise(x, andrzej) -> Bung(andrzej, cindie)) -> therefore Bung(andrzej, cindie) Narcotise(cindie, andrzej) and Bung(andrzej, cindie) and forall x (Narcotise(x, andrzej) and Bung(andrzej, cindie) -> Articulary(cindie)) -> therefore Articulary(cindie) Articulary(cindie) and forall x (Articulary(x) -> Bung(x, cindie)) -> therefore Bung(cindie, cindie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The norine is pederastic. The norine is wideband. The norine is homosexual. The norine point the venkat. The norine enthrall the venkat. The norine winkle the venkat. The venkat is unionised. The venkat is plushy. The venkat enthrall the norine. The venkat winkle the norine. If someone winkle the venkat then the venkat point the norine. If the venkat enthrall the norine and the norine is wideband then the venkat point the norine. If someone is plushy and they see the norine then they need the venkat. If someone winkle the venkat and the venkat point the norine then the norine is unionised. If the venkat winkle the norine and the norine is pederastic then the venkat is homosexual. If someone is unionised then they need the norine. The norine does not need the norine.", "logic": "\nPederastic(norine)\nWideband(norine)\nHomosexual(norine)\nPoint(norine, venkat)\nEnthrall(norine, venkat)\nWinkle(norine, venkat)\nUnionised(venkat)\nPlushy(venkat)\nEnthrall(venkat, norine)\nWinkle(venkat, norine)\nforall x (Winkle(x, venkat) -> Point(venkat, norine))\nEnthrall(venkat, norine) and Wideband(norine) -> Point(venkat, norine)\nforall x (Plushy(x) and Enthrall(x, norine) -> Point(x, venkat))\nforall x (Winkle(x, venkat) and Point(venkat, norine) -> Unionised(norine))\nWinkle(venkat, norine) and Pederastic(norine) -> Homosexual(venkat)\nforall x (Unionised(x) -> Point(x, norine))\n\nnot Point(norine, norine)\n\nWinkle(norine, venkat) and forall x (Winkle(x, venkat) -> Point(venkat, norine)) -> therefore Point(venkat, norine) Winkle(norine, venkat) and Point(venkat, norine) and forall x (Winkle(x, venkat) and Point(venkat, norine) -> Unionised(norine)) -> therefore Unionised(norine) Unionised(norine) and forall x (Unionised(x) -> Point(x, norine)) -> therefore Point(norine, norine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The dan is foetid. The dan is adapted. The dan is apoplectic. The dan transgress the karlie. The dan palisade the karlie. The dan harm the karlie. The karlie is brilliant. The karlie is semilunar. The karlie palisade the dan. The karlie harm the dan. If someone harm the karlie then the karlie transgress the dan. If the karlie palisade the dan and the dan is adapted then the karlie transgress the dan. If someone is semilunar and they see the dan then they need the karlie. If someone harm the karlie and the karlie transgress the dan then the dan is brilliant. If the karlie harm the dan and the dan is foetid then the karlie is apoplectic. If someone is brilliant then they need the dan. The karlie does not visit the karlie.", "logic": "\nFoetid(dan)\nAdapted(dan)\nApoplectic(dan)\nTransgress(dan, karlie)\nPalisade(dan, karlie)\nHarm(dan, karlie)\nBrilliant(karlie)\nSemilunar(karlie)\nPalisade(karlie, dan)\nHarm(karlie, dan)\nforall x (Harm(x, karlie) -> Transgress(karlie, dan))\nPalisade(karlie, dan) and Adapted(dan) -> Transgress(karlie, dan)\nforall x (Semilunar(x) and Palisade(x, dan) -> Transgress(x, karlie))\nforall x (Harm(x, karlie) and Transgress(karlie, dan) -> Brilliant(dan))\nHarm(karlie, dan) and Foetid(dan) -> Apoplectic(karlie)\nforall x (Brilliant(x) -> Transgress(x, dan))\n\nnot Harm(karlie, karlie)\n\nnot Harm(karlie, karlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The donni is aslant. The donni is finable. The donni is putative. The donni insinuate the lenora. The donni outlive the lenora. The donni celebrate the lenora. The lenora is stoned. The lenora is sunrise. The lenora outlive the donni. The lenora celebrate the donni. If someone celebrate the lenora then the lenora insinuate the donni. If the lenora outlive the donni and the donni is finable then the lenora insinuate the donni. If someone is sunrise and they see the donni then they need the lenora. If someone celebrate the lenora and the lenora insinuate the donni then the donni is stoned. If the lenora celebrate the donni and the donni is aslant then the lenora is putative. If someone is stoned then they need the donni. The lenora is finable.", "logic": "\nAslant(donni)\nFinable(donni)\nPutative(donni)\nInsinuate(donni, lenora)\nOutlive(donni, lenora)\nCelebrate(donni, lenora)\nStoned(lenora)\nSunrise(lenora)\nOutlive(lenora, donni)\nCelebrate(lenora, donni)\nforall x (Celebrate(x, lenora) -> Insinuate(lenora, donni))\nOutlive(lenora, donni) and Finable(donni) -> Insinuate(lenora, donni)\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Outlive(x, donni) -> Insinuate(x, lenora))\nforall x (Celebrate(x, lenora) and Insinuate(lenora, donni) -> Stoned(donni))\nCelebrate(lenora, donni) and Aslant(donni) -> Putative(lenora)\nforall x (Stoned(x) -> Insinuate(x, donni))\n\nFinable(lenora)\n\nFinable(lenora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The kareem is dominated. The kareem is monoclinic. The kareem is tapered. The kareem sexualize the othilia. The kareem jumble the othilia. The kareem sleet the othilia. The othilia is sumatran. The othilia is piggy. The othilia jumble the kareem. The othilia sleet the kareem. If someone sleet the othilia then the othilia sexualize the kareem. If the othilia jumble the kareem and the kareem is monoclinic then the othilia sexualize the kareem. If someone is piggy and they see the kareem then they need the othilia. If someone sleet the othilia and the othilia sexualize the kareem then the kareem is sumatran. If the othilia sleet the kareem and the kareem is dominated then the othilia is tapered. If someone is sumatran then they need the kareem. The kareem does not visit the kareem.", "logic": "\nDominated(kareem)\nMonoclinic(kareem)\nTapered(kareem)\nSexualize(kareem, othilia)\nJumble(kareem, othilia)\nSleet(kareem, othilia)\nSumatran(othilia)\nPiggy(othilia)\nJumble(othilia, kareem)\nSleet(othilia, kareem)\nforall x (Sleet(x, othilia) -> Sexualize(othilia, kareem))\nJumble(othilia, kareem) and Monoclinic(kareem) -> Sexualize(othilia, kareem)\nforall x (Piggy(x) and Jumble(x, kareem) -> Sexualize(x, othilia))\nforall x (Sleet(x, othilia) and Sexualize(othilia, kareem) -> Sumatran(kareem))\nSleet(othilia, kareem) and Dominated(kareem) -> Tapered(othilia)\nforall x (Sumatran(x) -> Sexualize(x, kareem))\n\nnot Sleet(kareem, kareem)\n\nnot Sleet(kareem, kareem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The isabella is increasing. The isabella is choleric. The isabella is maplelike. The isabella gravel the bonnee. The isabella caricature the bonnee. The isabella peruse the bonnee. The bonnee is rhinal. The bonnee is molal. The bonnee caricature the isabella. The bonnee peruse the isabella. If someone peruse the bonnee then the bonnee gravel the isabella. If the bonnee caricature the isabella and the isabella is choleric then the bonnee gravel the isabella. If someone is molal and they see the isabella then they need the bonnee. If someone peruse the bonnee and the bonnee gravel the isabella then the isabella is rhinal. If the bonnee peruse the isabella and the isabella is increasing then the bonnee is maplelike. If someone is rhinal then they need the isabella. The isabella is molal.", "logic": "\nIncreasing(isabella)\nCholeric(isabella)\nMaplelike(isabella)\nGravel(isabella, bonnee)\nCaricature(isabella, bonnee)\nPeruse(isabella, bonnee)\nRhinal(bonnee)\nMolal(bonnee)\nCaricature(bonnee, isabella)\nPeruse(bonnee, isabella)\nforall x (Peruse(x, bonnee) -> Gravel(bonnee, isabella))\nCaricature(bonnee, isabella) and Choleric(isabella) -> Gravel(bonnee, isabella)\nforall x (Molal(x) and Caricature(x, isabella) -> Gravel(x, bonnee))\nforall x (Peruse(x, bonnee) and Gravel(bonnee, isabella) -> Rhinal(isabella))\nPeruse(bonnee, isabella) and Increasing(isabella) -> Maplelike(bonnee)\nforall x (Rhinal(x) -> Gravel(x, isabella))\n\nMolal(isabella)\n\nMolal(isabella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The robbin is hourly. The robbin is analgesic. The robbin is reducible. The robbin twang the levi. The robbin file the levi. The robbin crust the levi. The levi is hellenic. The levi is shaped. The levi file the robbin. The levi crust the robbin. If someone crust the levi then the levi twang the robbin. If the levi file the robbin and the robbin is analgesic then the levi twang the robbin. If someone is shaped and they see the robbin then they need the levi. If someone crust the levi and the levi twang the robbin then the robbin is hellenic. If the levi crust the robbin and the robbin is hourly then the levi is reducible. If someone is hellenic then they need the robbin. The robbin does not see the robbin.", "logic": "\nHourly(robbin)\nAnalgesic(robbin)\nReducible(robbin)\nTwang(robbin, levi)\nFile(robbin, levi)\nCrust(robbin, levi)\nHellenic(levi)\nShaped(levi)\nFile(levi, robbin)\nCrust(levi, robbin)\nforall x (Crust(x, levi) -> Twang(levi, robbin))\nFile(levi, robbin) and Analgesic(robbin) -> Twang(levi, robbin)\nforall x (Shaped(x) and File(x, robbin) -> Twang(x, levi))\nforall x (Crust(x, levi) and Twang(levi, robbin) -> Hellenic(robbin))\nCrust(levi, robbin) and Hourly(robbin) -> Reducible(levi)\nforall x (Hellenic(x) -> Twang(x, robbin))\n\nnot File(robbin, robbin)\n\nnot File(robbin, robbin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The edna is exculpated. The edna is japanese. The edna is selected. The edna jounce the ash. The edna remember the ash. The edna buttonhole the ash. The ash is blabby. The ash is chiasmic. The ash remember the edna. The ash buttonhole the edna. If someone buttonhole the ash then the ash jounce the edna. If the ash remember the edna and the edna is japanese then the ash jounce the edna. If someone is chiasmic and they see the edna then they need the ash. If someone buttonhole the ash and the ash jounce the edna then the edna is blabby. If the ash buttonhole the edna and the edna is exculpated then the ash is selected. If someone is blabby then they need the edna. The ash is exculpated.", "logic": "\nExculpated(edna)\nJapanese(edna)\nSelected(edna)\nJounce(edna, ash)\nRemember(edna, ash)\nButtonhole(edna, ash)\nBlabby(ash)\nChiasmic(ash)\nRemember(ash, edna)\nButtonhole(ash, edna)\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, ash) -> Jounce(ash, edna))\nRemember(ash, edna) and Japanese(edna) -> Jounce(ash, edna)\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) and Remember(x, edna) -> Jounce(x, ash))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, ash) and Jounce(ash, edna) -> Blabby(edna))\nButtonhole(ash, edna) and Exculpated(edna) -> Selected(ash)\nforall x (Blabby(x) -> Jounce(x, edna))\n\nExculpated(ash)\n\nExculpated(ash) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The silvain disrespect the pavia. The silvain hark the sherye. The pavia is manifest. The pavia hark the dayle. The sherye is lovely. The sherye disrespect the pavia. The dayle is cursorial. If someone covenant the sherye then they see the silvain. If someone is cursorial and they like the dayle then the dayle covenant the silvain. If someone hark the sherye and they need the pavia then the pavia covenant the silvain. All lovely people are foxy. If someone is foxy then they are manifest. If someone is manifest and lovely then they like the dayle. The silvain hark the sherye.", "logic": "\nDisrespect(silvain, pavia)\nHark(silvain, sherye)\nManifest(pavia)\nHark(pavia, dayle)\nLovely(sherye)\nDisrespect(sherye, pavia)\nCursorial(dayle)\nforall x (Covenant(x, sherye) -> Hark(x, silvain))\nforall x (Cursorial(x) and Covenant(x, dayle) -> Covenant(dayle, silvain))\nforall x (Hark(x, sherye) and Disrespect(x, pavia) -> Covenant(pavia, silvain))\nforall x (Lovely(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Manifest(x) and Lovely(x) -> Covenant(x, dayle))\n\nHark(silvain, sherye)\n\ntherefore Hark(silvain, sherye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The kin belly the marinna. The kin intone the matteo. The marinna is becalmed. The marinna intone the allina. The matteo is bayesian. The matteo belly the marinna. The allina is hateful. If someone aviate the matteo then they see the kin. If someone is hateful and they like the allina then the allina aviate the kin. If someone intone the matteo and they need the marinna then the marinna aviate the kin. All bayesian people are distant. If someone is distant then they are becalmed. If someone is becalmed and bayesian then they like the allina. The allina is not hateful.", "logic": "\nBelly(kin, marinna)\nIntone(kin, matteo)\nBecalmed(marinna)\nIntone(marinna, allina)\nBayesian(matteo)\nBelly(matteo, marinna)\nHateful(allina)\nforall x (Aviate(x, matteo) -> Intone(x, kin))\nforall x (Hateful(x) and Aviate(x, allina) -> Aviate(allina, kin))\nforall x (Intone(x, matteo) and Belly(x, marinna) -> Aviate(marinna, kin))\nforall x (Bayesian(x) -> Distant(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nforall x (Becalmed(x) and Bayesian(x) -> Aviate(x, allina))\n\nnot Hateful(allina)\n\ntherefore Hateful(allina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The gilberto renegade the nadya. The gilberto juxtapose the bernete. The nadya is deterrent. The nadya juxtapose the annabel. The bernete is undefiled. The bernete renegade the nadya. The annabel is unwoven. If someone molest the bernete then they see the gilberto. If someone is unwoven and they like the annabel then the annabel molest the gilberto. If someone juxtapose the bernete and they need the nadya then the nadya molest the gilberto. All undefiled people are efficient. If someone is efficient then they are deterrent. If someone is deterrent and undefiled then they like the annabel. The bernete is efficient.", "logic": "\nRenegade(gilberto, nadya)\nJuxtapose(gilberto, bernete)\nDeterrent(nadya)\nJuxtapose(nadya, annabel)\nUndefiled(bernete)\nRenegade(bernete, nadya)\nUnwoven(annabel)\nforall x (Molest(x, bernete) -> Juxtapose(x, gilberto))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Molest(x, annabel) -> Molest(annabel, gilberto))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, bernete) and Renegade(x, nadya) -> Molest(nadya, gilberto))\nforall x (Undefiled(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and Undefiled(x) -> Molest(x, annabel))\n\nEfficient(bernete)\n\nUndefiled(bernete) and forall x (Undefiled(x) -> Efficient(x)) -> therefore Efficient(bernete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The wit syndicate the drake. The wit feel the kin. The drake is analogical. The drake feel the winonah. The kin is laggard. The kin syndicate the drake. The winonah is sought. If someone censure the kin then they see the wit. If someone is sought and they like the winonah then the winonah censure the wit. If someone feel the kin and they need the drake then the drake censure the wit. All laggard people are unlike. If someone is unlike then they are analogical. If someone is analogical and laggard then they like the winonah. The drake does not like the wit.", "logic": "\nSyndicate(wit, drake)\nFeel(wit, kin)\nAnalogical(drake)\nFeel(drake, winonah)\nLaggard(kin)\nSyndicate(kin, drake)\nSought(winonah)\nforall x (Censure(x, kin) -> Feel(x, wit))\nforall x (Sought(x) and Censure(x, winonah) -> Censure(winonah, wit))\nforall x (Feel(x, kin) and Syndicate(x, drake) -> Censure(drake, wit))\nforall x (Laggard(x) -> Unlike(x))\nforall x (Unlike(x) -> Analogical(x))\nforall x (Analogical(x) and Laggard(x) -> Censure(x, winonah))\n\nnot Censure(drake, wit)\n\nFeel(wit, kin) and Syndicate(wit, drake) and forall x (Feel(x, kin) and Syndicate(x, drake) -> Censure(drake, wit)) -> therefore Censure(drake, wit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The carmelia lavish the gipsy. The carmelia exhort the mireielle. The gipsy is timid. The gipsy exhort the allissa. The mireielle is deductive. The mireielle lavish the gipsy. The allissa is treacly. If someone ostentate the mireielle then they see the carmelia. If someone is treacly and they like the allissa then the allissa ostentate the carmelia. If someone exhort the mireielle and they need the gipsy then the gipsy ostentate the carmelia. All deductive people are ploughed. If someone is ploughed then they are timid. If someone is timid and deductive then they like the allissa. The mireielle is timid.", "logic": "\nLavish(carmelia, gipsy)\nExhort(carmelia, mireielle)\nTimid(gipsy)\nExhort(gipsy, allissa)\nDeductive(mireielle)\nLavish(mireielle, gipsy)\nTreacly(allissa)\nforall x (Ostentate(x, mireielle) -> Exhort(x, carmelia))\nforall x (Treacly(x) and Ostentate(x, allissa) -> Ostentate(allissa, carmelia))\nforall x (Exhort(x, mireielle) and Lavish(x, gipsy) -> Ostentate(gipsy, carmelia))\nforall x (Deductive(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) and Deductive(x) -> Ostentate(x, allissa))\n\nTimid(mireielle)\n\nDeductive(mireielle) and forall x (Deductive(x) -> Ploughed(x)) -> therefore Ploughed(mireielle) Ploughed(mireielle) and forall x (Ploughed(x) -> Timid(x)) -> therefore Timid(mireielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The jeannette catapult the titus. The jeannette contract the gladis. The titus is rosaceous. The titus contract the elden. The gladis is aliform. The gladis catapult the titus. The elden is spheric. If someone shingle the gladis then they see the jeannette. If someone is spheric and they like the elden then the elden shingle the jeannette. If someone contract the gladis and they need the titus then the titus shingle the jeannette. All aliform people are catamenial. If someone is catamenial then they are rosaceous. If someone is rosaceous and aliform then they like the elden. The gladis is not rosaceous.", "logic": "\nCatapult(jeannette, titus)\nContract(jeannette, gladis)\nRosaceous(titus)\nContract(titus, elden)\nAliform(gladis)\nCatapult(gladis, titus)\nSpheric(elden)\nforall x (Shingle(x, gladis) -> Contract(x, jeannette))\nforall x (Spheric(x) and Shingle(x, elden) -> Shingle(elden, jeannette))\nforall x (Contract(x, gladis) and Catapult(x, titus) -> Shingle(titus, jeannette))\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) and Aliform(x) -> Shingle(x, elden))\n\nnot Rosaceous(gladis)\n\nAliform(gladis) and forall x (Aliform(x) -> Catamenial(x)) -> therefore Catamenial(gladis) Catamenial(gladis) and forall x (Catamenial(x) -> Rosaceous(x)) -> therefore Rosaceous(gladis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The sophronia depone the rosetta. The sophronia attribute the leopold. The rosetta is avoidable. The rosetta attribute the samuele. The leopold is unifoliate. The leopold depone the rosetta. The samuele is diametral. If someone pine the leopold then they see the sophronia. If someone is diametral and they like the samuele then the samuele pine the sophronia. If someone attribute the leopold and they need the rosetta then the rosetta pine the sophronia. All unifoliate people are organized. If someone is organized then they are avoidable. If someone is avoidable and unifoliate then they like the samuele. The leopold pine the samuele.", "logic": "\nDepone(sophronia, rosetta)\nAttribute(sophronia, leopold)\nAvoidable(rosetta)\nAttribute(rosetta, samuele)\nUnifoliate(leopold)\nDepone(leopold, rosetta)\nDiametral(samuele)\nforall x (Pine(x, leopold) -> Attribute(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Diametral(x) and Pine(x, samuele) -> Pine(samuele, sophronia))\nforall x (Attribute(x, leopold) and Depone(x, rosetta) -> Pine(rosetta, sophronia))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Organized(x))\nforall x (Organized(x) -> Avoidable(x))\nforall x (Avoidable(x) and Unifoliate(x) -> Pine(x, samuele))\n\nPine(leopold, samuele)\n\nUnifoliate(leopold) and forall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Organized(x)) -> therefore Organized(leopold) Organized(leopold) and forall x (Organized(x) -> Avoidable(x)) -> therefore Avoidable(leopold) Avoidable(leopold) and Unifoliate(leopold) and forall x (Avoidable(x) and Unifoliate(x) -> Pine(x, samuele)) -> therefore Pine(leopold, samuele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The axel maximize the celestina. The axel retain the kenny. The celestina is waterproof. The celestina retain the frederico. The kenny is outlawed. The kenny maximize the celestina. The frederico is clustered. If someone root the kenny then they see the axel. If someone is clustered and they like the frederico then the frederico root the axel. If someone retain the kenny and they need the celestina then the celestina root the axel. All outlawed people are inguinal. If someone is inguinal then they are waterproof. If someone is waterproof and outlawed then they like the frederico. The kenny does not like the frederico.", "logic": "\nMaximize(axel, celestina)\nRetain(axel, kenny)\nWaterproof(celestina)\nRetain(celestina, frederico)\nOutlawed(kenny)\nMaximize(kenny, celestina)\nClustered(frederico)\nforall x (Root(x, kenny) -> Retain(x, axel))\nforall x (Clustered(x) and Root(x, frederico) -> Root(frederico, axel))\nforall x (Retain(x, kenny) and Maximize(x, celestina) -> Root(celestina, axel))\nforall x (Outlawed(x) -> Inguinal(x))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) -> Waterproof(x))\nforall x (Waterproof(x) and Outlawed(x) -> Root(x, frederico))\n\nnot Root(kenny, frederico)\n\nOutlawed(kenny) and forall x (Outlawed(x) -> Inguinal(x)) -> therefore Inguinal(kenny) Inguinal(kenny) and forall x (Inguinal(x) -> Waterproof(x)) -> therefore Waterproof(kenny) Waterproof(kenny) and Outlawed(kenny) and forall x (Waterproof(x) and Outlawed(x) -> Root(x, frederico)) -> therefore Root(kenny, frederico)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The lizette accrue the eli. The lizette acerbate the celestine. The eli is tarsal. The eli acerbate the stacee. The celestine is prognathic. The celestine accrue the eli. The stacee is monstrous. If someone separate the celestine then they see the lizette. If someone is monstrous and they like the stacee then the stacee separate the lizette. If someone acerbate the celestine and they need the eli then the eli separate the lizette. All prognathic people are long. If someone is long then they are tarsal. If someone is tarsal and prognathic then they like the stacee. The lizette does not see the lizette.", "logic": "\nAccrue(lizette, eli)\nAcerbate(lizette, celestine)\nTarsal(eli)\nAcerbate(eli, stacee)\nPrognathic(celestine)\nAccrue(celestine, eli)\nMonstrous(stacee)\nforall x (Separate(x, celestine) -> Acerbate(x, lizette))\nforall x (Monstrous(x) and Separate(x, stacee) -> Separate(stacee, lizette))\nforall x (Acerbate(x, celestine) and Accrue(x, eli) -> Separate(eli, lizette))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) -> Long(x))\nforall x (Long(x) -> Tarsal(x))\nforall x (Tarsal(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Separate(x, stacee))\n\nnot Acerbate(lizette, lizette)\n\nforall x (Separate(x, celestine) -> Acerbate(x, lizette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The emerson romp the marcelo. The emerson calculate the alethea. The marcelo is unironed. The marcelo calculate the libbey. The alethea is exceeding. The alethea romp the marcelo. The libbey is consecrate. If someone explore the alethea then they see the emerson. If someone is consecrate and they like the libbey then the libbey explore the emerson. If someone calculate the alethea and they need the marcelo then the marcelo explore the emerson. All exceeding people are cashed. If someone is cashed then they are unironed. If someone is unironed and exceeding then they like the libbey. The marcelo explore the libbey.", "logic": "\nRomp(emerson, marcelo)\nCalculate(emerson, alethea)\nUnironed(marcelo)\nCalculate(marcelo, libbey)\nExceeding(alethea)\nRomp(alethea, marcelo)\nConsecrate(libbey)\nforall x (Explore(x, alethea) -> Calculate(x, emerson))\nforall x (Consecrate(x) and Explore(x, libbey) -> Explore(libbey, emerson))\nforall x (Calculate(x, alethea) and Romp(x, marcelo) -> Explore(marcelo, emerson))\nforall x (Exceeding(x) -> Cashed(x))\nforall x (Cashed(x) -> Unironed(x))\nforall x (Unironed(x) and Exceeding(x) -> Explore(x, libbey))\n\nExplore(marcelo, libbey)\n\nforall x (Unironed(x) and Exceeding(x) -> Explore(x, libbey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The netta carburet the jemmie. The netta weather the freemon. The jemmie is consumable. The jemmie weather the taite. The freemon is whiny. The freemon carburet the jemmie. The taite is monarchal. If someone stumble the freemon then they see the netta. If someone is monarchal and they like the taite then the taite stumble the netta. If someone weather the freemon and they need the jemmie then the jemmie stumble the netta. All whiny people are suspended. If someone is suspended then they are consumable. If someone is consumable and whiny then they like the taite. The netta is not suspended.", "logic": "\nCarburet(netta, jemmie)\nWeather(netta, freemon)\nConsumable(jemmie)\nWeather(jemmie, taite)\nWhiny(freemon)\nCarburet(freemon, jemmie)\nMonarchal(taite)\nforall x (Stumble(x, freemon) -> Weather(x, netta))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) and Stumble(x, taite) -> Stumble(taite, netta))\nforall x (Weather(x, freemon) and Carburet(x, jemmie) -> Stumble(jemmie, netta))\nforall x (Whiny(x) -> Suspended(x))\nforall x (Suspended(x) -> Consumable(x))\nforall x (Consumable(x) and Whiny(x) -> Stumble(x, taite))\n\nnot Suspended(netta)\n\nforall x (Whiny(x) -> Suspended(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The farah snaffle the gina. The farah overboil the dario. The gina is reputable. The gina overboil the waneta. The dario is chatty. The dario snaffle the gina. The waneta is mandaean. If someone cinematise the dario then they see the farah. If someone is mandaean and they like the waneta then the waneta cinematise the farah. If someone overboil the dario and they need the gina then the gina cinematise the farah. All chatty people are choric. If someone is choric then they are reputable. If someone is reputable and chatty then they like the waneta. The farah is reputable.", "logic": "\nSnaffle(farah, gina)\nOverboil(farah, dario)\nReputable(gina)\nOverboil(gina, waneta)\nChatty(dario)\nSnaffle(dario, gina)\nMandaean(waneta)\nforall x (Cinematise(x, dario) -> Overboil(x, farah))\nforall x (Mandaean(x) and Cinematise(x, waneta) -> Cinematise(waneta, farah))\nforall x (Overboil(x, dario) and Snaffle(x, gina) -> Cinematise(gina, farah))\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Choric(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Reputable(x))\nforall x (Reputable(x) and Chatty(x) -> Cinematise(x, waneta))\n\nReputable(farah)\n\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Reputable(x)) <- forall x (Chatty(x) -> Choric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The kassey sneer the carol. The kassey adapt the ginnifer. The carol is nilotic. The carol adapt the jennifer. The ginnifer is epicarpal. The ginnifer sneer the carol. The jennifer is heard. If someone deaminize the ginnifer then they see the kassey. If someone is heard and they like the jennifer then the jennifer deaminize the kassey. If someone adapt the ginnifer and they need the carol then the carol deaminize the kassey. All epicarpal people are atrophied. If someone is atrophied then they are nilotic. If someone is nilotic and epicarpal then they like the jennifer. The ginnifer does not see the carol.", "logic": "\nSneer(kassey, carol)\nAdapt(kassey, ginnifer)\nNilotic(carol)\nAdapt(carol, jennifer)\nEpicarpal(ginnifer)\nSneer(ginnifer, carol)\nHeard(jennifer)\nforall x (Deaminize(x, ginnifer) -> Adapt(x, kassey))\nforall x (Heard(x) and Deaminize(x, jennifer) -> Deaminize(jennifer, kassey))\nforall x (Adapt(x, ginnifer) and Sneer(x, carol) -> Deaminize(carol, kassey))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Nilotic(x))\nforall x (Nilotic(x) and Epicarpal(x) -> Deaminize(x, jennifer))\n\nnot Adapt(ginnifer, carol)\n\nnot Adapt(ginnifer, carol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The prescott shepherd the clerissa. The prescott vitalize the torrance. The clerissa is titillated. The clerissa vitalize the pauli. The torrance is multilane. The torrance shepherd the clerissa. The pauli is unstinting. If someone reopen the torrance then they see the prescott. If someone is unstinting and they like the pauli then the pauli reopen the prescott. If someone vitalize the torrance and they need the clerissa then the clerissa reopen the prescott. All multilane people are zymoid. If someone is zymoid then they are titillated. If someone is titillated and multilane then they like the pauli. The clerissa vitalize the clerissa.", "logic": "\nShepherd(prescott, clerissa)\nVitalize(prescott, torrance)\nTitillated(clerissa)\nVitalize(clerissa, pauli)\nMultilane(torrance)\nShepherd(torrance, clerissa)\nUnstinting(pauli)\nforall x (Reopen(x, torrance) -> Vitalize(x, prescott))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) and Reopen(x, pauli) -> Reopen(pauli, prescott))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, torrance) and Shepherd(x, clerissa) -> Reopen(clerissa, prescott))\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Titillated(x))\nforall x (Titillated(x) and Multilane(x) -> Reopen(x, pauli))\n\nVitalize(clerissa, clerissa)\n\nVitalize(clerissa, clerissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The dillon neck the piet. The dillon electrify the niven. The piet is cimmerian. The piet electrify the calvin. The niven is unlearned. The niven neck the piet. The calvin is canted. If someone bespeckle the niven then they see the dillon. If someone is canted and they like the calvin then the calvin bespeckle the dillon. If someone electrify the niven and they need the piet then the piet bespeckle the dillon. All unlearned people are mucinoid. If someone is mucinoid then they are cimmerian. If someone is cimmerian and unlearned then they like the calvin. The calvin does not need the piet.", "logic": "\nNeck(dillon, piet)\nElectrify(dillon, niven)\nCimmerian(piet)\nElectrify(piet, calvin)\nUnlearned(niven)\nNeck(niven, piet)\nCanted(calvin)\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, niven) -> Electrify(x, dillon))\nforall x (Canted(x) and Bespeckle(x, calvin) -> Bespeckle(calvin, dillon))\nforall x (Electrify(x, niven) and Neck(x, piet) -> Bespeckle(piet, dillon))\nforall x (Unlearned(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Cimmerian(x))\nforall x (Cimmerian(x) and Unlearned(x) -> Bespeckle(x, calvin))\n\nnot Neck(calvin, piet)\n\nnot Neck(calvin, piet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The dodi demob the katy. The dodi scat the kirby. The katy is insectan. The katy scat the emmalynne. The kirby is rodlike. The kirby demob the katy. The emmalynne is smooth. If someone flounce the kirby then they see the dodi. If someone is smooth and they like the emmalynne then the emmalynne flounce the dodi. If someone scat the kirby and they need the katy then the katy flounce the dodi. All rodlike people are transfixed. If someone is transfixed then they are insectan. If someone is insectan and rodlike then they like the emmalynne. The dodi demob the dodi.", "logic": "\nDemob(dodi, katy)\nScat(dodi, kirby)\nInsectan(katy)\nScat(katy, emmalynne)\nRodlike(kirby)\nDemob(kirby, katy)\nSmooth(emmalynne)\nforall x (Flounce(x, kirby) -> Scat(x, dodi))\nforall x (Smooth(x) and Flounce(x, emmalynne) -> Flounce(emmalynne, dodi))\nforall x (Scat(x, kirby) and Demob(x, katy) -> Flounce(katy, dodi))\nforall x (Rodlike(x) -> Transfixed(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> Insectan(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) and Rodlike(x) -> Flounce(x, emmalynne))\n\nDemob(dodi, dodi)\n\nDemob(dodi, dodi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The samson border the russ. The samson favour the dasie. The freeman border the russ. The freeman is diffused. The freeman is treated. The dasie border the freeman. The russ denounce the dasie. If something denounce the freeman and it denounce the russ then it denounce the dasie. If something is diffused and treated then it is unread. If the freeman is outer and the freeman is mucous then the freeman denounce the dasie. If something is diffused and unread then it border the russ. If something border the samson then the samson border the freeman. If something is unread and it favour the dasie then it is treated. If something is unread and it favour the samson then the samson favour the dasie. If something is unread and diffused then it border the samson. The freeman is treated.", "logic": "\nBorder(samson, russ)\nFavour(samson, dasie)\nBorder(freeman, russ)\nDiffused(freeman)\nTreated(freeman)\nBorder(dasie, freeman)\nDenounce(russ, dasie)\nforall x (Denounce(x, freeman) and Denounce(x, russ) -> Denounce(x, dasie))\nforall x (Diffused(x) and Treated(x) -> Unread(x))\nOuter(freeman) and Mucous(freeman) -> Denounce(freeman, dasie)\nforall x (Diffused(x) and Unread(x) -> Border(x, russ))\nforall x (Border(x, samson) -> Border(samson, freeman))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Favour(x, dasie) -> Treated(x))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Favour(x, samson) -> Favour(samson, dasie))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Diffused(x) -> Border(x, samson))\n\nTreated(freeman)\n\ntherefore Treated(freeman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The nitin whirr the wadsworth. The nitin remarry the horace. The brandi whirr the wadsworth. The brandi is valuable. The brandi is conjoint. The horace whirr the brandi. The wadsworth bosom the horace. If something bosom the brandi and it bosom the wadsworth then it bosom the horace. If something is valuable and conjoint then it is outfitted. If the brandi is blustering and the brandi is featured then the brandi bosom the horace. If something is valuable and outfitted then it whirr the wadsworth. If something whirr the nitin then the nitin whirr the brandi. If something is outfitted and it remarry the horace then it is conjoint. If something is outfitted and it remarry the nitin then the nitin remarry the horace. If something is outfitted and valuable then it whirr the nitin. The nitin does not eat the wadsworth.", "logic": "\nWhirr(nitin, wadsworth)\nRemarry(nitin, horace)\nWhirr(brandi, wadsworth)\nValuable(brandi)\nConjoint(brandi)\nWhirr(horace, brandi)\nBosom(wadsworth, horace)\nforall x (Bosom(x, brandi) and Bosom(x, wadsworth) -> Bosom(x, horace))\nforall x (Valuable(x) and Conjoint(x) -> Outfitted(x))\nBlustering(brandi) and Featured(brandi) -> Bosom(brandi, horace)\nforall x (Valuable(x) and Outfitted(x) -> Whirr(x, wadsworth))\nforall x (Whirr(x, nitin) -> Whirr(nitin, brandi))\nforall x (Outfitted(x) and Remarry(x, horace) -> Conjoint(x))\nforall x (Outfitted(x) and Remarry(x, nitin) -> Remarry(nitin, horace))\nforall x (Outfitted(x) and Valuable(x) -> Whirr(x, nitin))\n\nnot Whirr(nitin, wadsworth)\n\ntherefore Whirr(nitin, wadsworth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The ardys coact the horst. The ardys drub the turner. The rana coact the horst. The rana is chiasmal. The rana is profuse. The turner coact the rana. The horst redeposit the turner. If something redeposit the rana and it redeposit the horst then it redeposit the turner. If something is chiasmal and profuse then it is impugnable. If the rana is topnotch and the rana is sign then the rana redeposit the turner. If something is chiasmal and impugnable then it coact the horst. If something coact the ardys then the ardys coact the rana. If something is impugnable and it drub the turner then it is profuse. If something is impugnable and it drub the ardys then the ardys drub the turner. If something is impugnable and chiasmal then it coact the ardys. The rana is impugnable.", "logic": "\nCoact(ardys, horst)\nDrub(ardys, turner)\nCoact(rana, horst)\nChiasmal(rana)\nProfuse(rana)\nCoact(turner, rana)\nRedeposit(horst, turner)\nforall x (Redeposit(x, rana) and Redeposit(x, horst) -> Redeposit(x, turner))\nforall x (Chiasmal(x) and Profuse(x) -> Impugnable(x))\nTopnotch(rana) and Sign(rana) -> Redeposit(rana, turner)\nforall x (Chiasmal(x) and Impugnable(x) -> Coact(x, horst))\nforall x (Coact(x, ardys) -> Coact(ardys, rana))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) and Drub(x, turner) -> Profuse(x))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) and Drub(x, ardys) -> Drub(ardys, turner))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) and Chiasmal(x) -> Coact(x, ardys))\n\nImpugnable(rana)\n\nChiasmal(rana) and Profuse(rana) and forall x (Chiasmal(x) and Profuse(x) -> Impugnable(x)) -> therefore Impugnable(rana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The joanna reline the orlando. The joanna limber the leeanne. The marne reline the orlando. The marne is atrocious. The marne is pulverised. The leeanne reline the marne. The orlando blotch the leeanne. If something blotch the marne and it blotch the orlando then it blotch the leeanne. If something is atrocious and pulverised then it is orchestral. If the marne is snub and the marne is struggling then the marne blotch the leeanne. If something is atrocious and orchestral then it reline the orlando. If something reline the joanna then the joanna reline the marne. If something is orchestral and it limber the leeanne then it is pulverised. If something is orchestral and it limber the joanna then the joanna limber the leeanne. If something is orchestral and atrocious then it reline the joanna. The marne is not orchestral.", "logic": "\nReline(joanna, orlando)\nLimber(joanna, leeanne)\nReline(marne, orlando)\nAtrocious(marne)\nPulverised(marne)\nReline(leeanne, marne)\nBlotch(orlando, leeanne)\nforall x (Blotch(x, marne) and Blotch(x, orlando) -> Blotch(x, leeanne))\nforall x (Atrocious(x) and Pulverised(x) -> Orchestral(x))\nSnub(marne) and Struggling(marne) -> Blotch(marne, leeanne)\nforall x (Atrocious(x) and Orchestral(x) -> Reline(x, orlando))\nforall x (Reline(x, joanna) -> Reline(joanna, marne))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and Limber(x, leeanne) -> Pulverised(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and Limber(x, joanna) -> Limber(joanna, leeanne))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and Atrocious(x) -> Reline(x, joanna))\n\nnot Orchestral(marne)\n\nAtrocious(marne) and Pulverised(marne) and forall x (Atrocious(x) and Pulverised(x) -> Orchestral(x)) -> therefore Orchestral(marne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The dian infiltrate the maryl. The dian peal the harcourt. The elena infiltrate the maryl. The elena is invalid. The elena is landscaped. The harcourt infiltrate the elena. The maryl unbolt the harcourt. If something unbolt the elena and it unbolt the maryl then it unbolt the harcourt. If something is invalid and landscaped then it is bony. If the elena is facial and the elena is epidemic then the elena unbolt the harcourt. If something is invalid and bony then it infiltrate the maryl. If something infiltrate the dian then the dian infiltrate the elena. If something is bony and it peal the harcourt then it is landscaped. If something is bony and it peal the dian then the dian peal the harcourt. If something is bony and invalid then it infiltrate the dian. The elena infiltrate the dian.", "logic": "\nInfiltrate(dian, maryl)\nPeal(dian, harcourt)\nInfiltrate(elena, maryl)\nInvalid(elena)\nLandscaped(elena)\nInfiltrate(harcourt, elena)\nUnbolt(maryl, harcourt)\nforall x (Unbolt(x, elena) and Unbolt(x, maryl) -> Unbolt(x, harcourt))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Landscaped(x) -> Bony(x))\nFacial(elena) and Epidemic(elena) -> Unbolt(elena, harcourt)\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Bony(x) -> Infiltrate(x, maryl))\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, dian) -> Infiltrate(dian, elena))\nforall x (Bony(x) and Peal(x, harcourt) -> Landscaped(x))\nforall x (Bony(x) and Peal(x, dian) -> Peal(dian, harcourt))\nforall x (Bony(x) and Invalid(x) -> Infiltrate(x, dian))\n\nInfiltrate(elena, dian)\n\nInvalid(elena) and Landscaped(elena) and forall x (Invalid(x) and Landscaped(x) -> Bony(x)) -> therefore Bony(elena) Bony(elena) and Invalid(elena) and forall x (Bony(x) and Invalid(x) -> Infiltrate(x, dian)) -> therefore Infiltrate(elena, dian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The junia bodge the odelle. The junia annihilate the joyce. The nealson bodge the odelle. The nealson is smoggy. The nealson is malawian. The joyce bodge the nealson. The odelle overmaster the joyce. If something overmaster the nealson and it overmaster the odelle then it overmaster the joyce. If something is smoggy and malawian then it is overage. If the nealson is tobagonian and the nealson is parasitic then the nealson overmaster the joyce. If something is smoggy and overage then it bodge the odelle. If something bodge the junia then the junia bodge the nealson. If something is overage and it annihilate the joyce then it is malawian. If something is overage and it annihilate the junia then the junia annihilate the joyce. If something is overage and smoggy then it bodge the junia. The nealson does not eat the junia.", "logic": "\nBodge(junia, odelle)\nAnnihilate(junia, joyce)\nBodge(nealson, odelle)\nSmoggy(nealson)\nMalawian(nealson)\nBodge(joyce, nealson)\nOvermaster(odelle, joyce)\nforall x (Overmaster(x, nealson) and Overmaster(x, odelle) -> Overmaster(x, joyce))\nforall x (Smoggy(x) and Malawian(x) -> Overage(x))\nTobagonian(nealson) and Parasitic(nealson) -> Overmaster(nealson, joyce)\nforall x (Smoggy(x) and Overage(x) -> Bodge(x, odelle))\nforall x (Bodge(x, junia) -> Bodge(junia, nealson))\nforall x (Overage(x) and Annihilate(x, joyce) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Overage(x) and Annihilate(x, junia) -> Annihilate(junia, joyce))\nforall x (Overage(x) and Smoggy(x) -> Bodge(x, junia))\n\nnot Bodge(nealson, junia)\n\nSmoggy(nealson) and Malawian(nealson) and forall x (Smoggy(x) and Malawian(x) -> Overage(x)) -> therefore Overage(nealson) Overage(nealson) and Smoggy(nealson) and forall x (Overage(x) and Smoggy(x) -> Bodge(x, junia)) -> therefore Bodge(nealson, junia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The bharat attempt the joey. The bharat avert the nil. The sheryl attempt the joey. The sheryl is lettered. The sheryl is desirable. The nil attempt the sheryl. The joey insert the nil. If something insert the sheryl and it insert the joey then it insert the nil. If something is lettered and desirable then it is refined. If the sheryl is downstage and the sheryl is neolithic then the sheryl insert the nil. If something is lettered and refined then it attempt the joey. If something attempt the bharat then the bharat attempt the sheryl. If something is refined and it avert the nil then it is desirable. If something is refined and it avert the bharat then the bharat avert the nil. If something is refined and lettered then it attempt the bharat. The bharat attempt the sheryl.", "logic": "\nAttempt(bharat, joey)\nAvert(bharat, nil)\nAttempt(sheryl, joey)\nLettered(sheryl)\nDesirable(sheryl)\nAttempt(nil, sheryl)\nInsert(joey, nil)\nforall x (Insert(x, sheryl) and Insert(x, joey) -> Insert(x, nil))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Desirable(x) -> Refined(x))\nDownstage(sheryl) and Neolithic(sheryl) -> Insert(sheryl, nil)\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Refined(x) -> Attempt(x, joey))\nforall x (Attempt(x, bharat) -> Attempt(bharat, sheryl))\nforall x (Refined(x) and Avert(x, nil) -> Desirable(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) and Avert(x, bharat) -> Avert(bharat, nil))\nforall x (Refined(x) and Lettered(x) -> Attempt(x, bharat))\n\nAttempt(bharat, sheryl)\n\nLettered(sheryl) and Desirable(sheryl) and forall x (Lettered(x) and Desirable(x) -> Refined(x)) -> therefore Refined(sheryl) Refined(sheryl) and Lettered(sheryl) and forall x (Refined(x) and Lettered(x) -> Attempt(x, bharat)) -> therefore Attempt(sheryl, bharat) Attempt(sheryl, bharat) and forall x (Attempt(x, bharat) -> Attempt(bharat, sheryl)) -> therefore Attempt(bharat, sheryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The garwin forsake the zondra. The garwin lecture the felicio. The sheba forsake the zondra. The sheba is atrophic. The sheba is unordered. The felicio forsake the sheba. The zondra canulate the felicio. If something canulate the sheba and it canulate the zondra then it canulate the felicio. If something is atrophic and unordered then it is resultant. If the sheba is offended and the sheba is ceaseless then the sheba canulate the felicio. If something is atrophic and resultant then it forsake the zondra. If something forsake the garwin then the garwin forsake the sheba. If something is resultant and it lecture the felicio then it is unordered. If something is resultant and it lecture the garwin then the garwin lecture the felicio. If something is resultant and atrophic then it forsake the garwin. The garwin does not eat the sheba.", "logic": "\nForsake(garwin, zondra)\nLecture(garwin, felicio)\nForsake(sheba, zondra)\nAtrophic(sheba)\nUnordered(sheba)\nForsake(felicio, sheba)\nCanulate(zondra, felicio)\nforall x (Canulate(x, sheba) and Canulate(x, zondra) -> Canulate(x, felicio))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) and Unordered(x) -> Resultant(x))\nOffended(sheba) and Ceaseless(sheba) -> Canulate(sheba, felicio)\nforall x (Atrophic(x) and Resultant(x) -> Forsake(x, zondra))\nforall x (Forsake(x, garwin) -> Forsake(garwin, sheba))\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Lecture(x, felicio) -> Unordered(x))\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Lecture(x, garwin) -> Lecture(garwin, felicio))\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Atrophic(x) -> Forsake(x, garwin))\n\nnot Forsake(garwin, sheba)\n\nAtrophic(sheba) and Unordered(sheba) and forall x (Atrophic(x) and Unordered(x) -> Resultant(x)) -> therefore Resultant(sheba) Resultant(sheba) and Atrophic(sheba) and forall x (Resultant(x) and Atrophic(x) -> Forsake(x, garwin)) -> therefore Forsake(sheba, garwin) Forsake(sheba, garwin) and forall x (Forsake(x, garwin) -> Forsake(garwin, sheba)) -> therefore Forsake(garwin, sheba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The burt oscillate the kristan. The burt imply the jackelyn. The corabella oscillate the kristan. The corabella is whitish. The corabella is gargantuan. The jackelyn oscillate the corabella. The kristan trisect the jackelyn. If something trisect the corabella and it trisect the kristan then it trisect the jackelyn. If something is whitish and gargantuan then it is polyoicous. If the corabella is childly and the corabella is bicyclic then the corabella trisect the jackelyn. If something is whitish and polyoicous then it oscillate the kristan. If something oscillate the burt then the burt oscillate the corabella. If something is polyoicous and it imply the jackelyn then it is gargantuan. If something is polyoicous and it imply the burt then the burt imply the jackelyn. If something is polyoicous and whitish then it oscillate the burt. The jackelyn is not gargantuan.", "logic": "\nOscillate(burt, kristan)\nImply(burt, jackelyn)\nOscillate(corabella, kristan)\nWhitish(corabella)\nGargantuan(corabella)\nOscillate(jackelyn, corabella)\nTrisect(kristan, jackelyn)\nforall x (Trisect(x, corabella) and Trisect(x, kristan) -> Trisect(x, jackelyn))\nforall x (Whitish(x) and Gargantuan(x) -> Polyoicous(x))\nChildly(corabella) and Bicyclic(corabella) -> Trisect(corabella, jackelyn)\nforall x (Whitish(x) and Polyoicous(x) -> Oscillate(x, kristan))\nforall x (Oscillate(x, burt) -> Oscillate(burt, corabella))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) and Imply(x, jackelyn) -> Gargantuan(x))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) and Imply(x, burt) -> Imply(burt, jackelyn))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) and Whitish(x) -> Oscillate(x, burt))\n\nnot Gargantuan(jackelyn)\n\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) and Imply(x, jackelyn) -> Gargantuan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The antonino full the thane. The antonino apprise the florencia. The zarah full the thane. The zarah is mishnaic. The zarah is permeating. The florencia full the zarah. The thane thunder the florencia. If something thunder the zarah and it thunder the thane then it thunder the florencia. If something is mishnaic and permeating then it is bogus. If the zarah is spirituous and the zarah is uncousinly then the zarah thunder the florencia. If something is mishnaic and bogus then it full the thane. If something full the antonino then the antonino full the zarah. If something is bogus and it apprise the florencia then it is permeating. If something is bogus and it apprise the antonino then the antonino apprise the florencia. If something is bogus and mishnaic then it full the antonino. The thane is permeating.", "logic": "\nFull(antonino, thane)\nApprise(antonino, florencia)\nFull(zarah, thane)\nMishnaic(zarah)\nPermeating(zarah)\nFull(florencia, zarah)\nThunder(thane, florencia)\nforall x (Thunder(x, zarah) and Thunder(x, thane) -> Thunder(x, florencia))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) and Permeating(x) -> Bogus(x))\nSpirituous(zarah) and Uncousinly(zarah) -> Thunder(zarah, florencia)\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) and Bogus(x) -> Full(x, thane))\nforall x (Full(x, antonino) -> Full(antonino, zarah))\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Apprise(x, florencia) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Apprise(x, antonino) -> Apprise(antonino, florencia))\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Mishnaic(x) -> Full(x, antonino))\n\nPermeating(thane)\n\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Apprise(x, florencia) -> Permeating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The stacy glance the darcie. The stacy marinate the bee. The kori glance the darcie. The kori is posh. The kori is unalloyed. The bee glance the kori. The darcie bebop the bee. If something bebop the kori and it bebop the darcie then it bebop the bee. If something is posh and unalloyed then it is jumentous. If the kori is biweekly and the kori is colonial then the kori bebop the bee. If something is posh and jumentous then it glance the darcie. If something glance the stacy then the stacy glance the kori. If something is jumentous and it marinate the bee then it is unalloyed. If something is jumentous and it marinate the stacy then the stacy marinate the bee. If something is jumentous and posh then it glance the stacy. The bee does not like the bee.", "logic": "\nGlance(stacy, darcie)\nMarinate(stacy, bee)\nGlance(kori, darcie)\nPosh(kori)\nUnalloyed(kori)\nGlance(bee, kori)\nBebop(darcie, bee)\nforall x (Bebop(x, kori) and Bebop(x, darcie) -> Bebop(x, bee))\nforall x (Posh(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nBiweekly(kori) and Colonial(kori) -> Bebop(kori, bee)\nforall x (Posh(x) and Jumentous(x) -> Glance(x, darcie))\nforall x (Glance(x, stacy) -> Glance(stacy, kori))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) and Marinate(x, bee) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) and Marinate(x, stacy) -> Marinate(stacy, bee))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) and Posh(x) -> Glance(x, stacy))\n\nnot Bebop(bee, bee)\n\nforall x (Bebop(x, kori) and Bebop(x, darcie) -> Bebop(x, bee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The loleta promise the delcina. The loleta stool the milli. The jaimie promise the delcina. The jaimie is divisible. The jaimie is duteous. The milli promise the jaimie. The delcina endue the milli. If something endue the jaimie and it endue the delcina then it endue the milli. If something is divisible and duteous then it is unpowered. If the jaimie is rimeless and the jaimie is faulty then the jaimie endue the milli. If something is divisible and unpowered then it promise the delcina. If something promise the loleta then the loleta promise the jaimie. If something is unpowered and it stool the milli then it is duteous. If something is unpowered and it stool the loleta then the loleta stool the milli. If something is unpowered and divisible then it promise the loleta. The jaimie endue the milli.", "logic": "\nPromise(loleta, delcina)\nStool(loleta, milli)\nPromise(jaimie, delcina)\nDivisible(jaimie)\nDuteous(jaimie)\nPromise(milli, jaimie)\nEndue(delcina, milli)\nforall x (Endue(x, jaimie) and Endue(x, delcina) -> Endue(x, milli))\nforall x (Divisible(x) and Duteous(x) -> Unpowered(x))\nRimeless(jaimie) and Faulty(jaimie) -> Endue(jaimie, milli)\nforall x (Divisible(x) and Unpowered(x) -> Promise(x, delcina))\nforall x (Promise(x, loleta) -> Promise(loleta, jaimie))\nforall x (Unpowered(x) and Stool(x, milli) -> Duteous(x))\nforall x (Unpowered(x) and Stool(x, loleta) -> Stool(loleta, milli))\nforall x (Unpowered(x) and Divisible(x) -> Promise(x, loleta))\n\nEndue(jaimie, milli)\n\nforall x (Endue(x, jaimie) and Endue(x, delcina) -> Endue(x, milli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The elizabeth cool the schuyler. The elizabeth displace the hamlin. The kitty cool the schuyler. The kitty is saponified. The kitty is depilous. The hamlin cool the kitty. The schuyler literalize the hamlin. If something literalize the kitty and it literalize the schuyler then it literalize the hamlin. If something is saponified and depilous then it is stimulated. If the kitty is oppressive and the kitty is nonnomadic then the kitty literalize the hamlin. If something is saponified and stimulated then it cool the schuyler. If something cool the elizabeth then the elizabeth cool the kitty. If something is stimulated and it displace the hamlin then it is depilous. If something is stimulated and it displace the elizabeth then the elizabeth displace the hamlin. If something is stimulated and saponified then it cool the elizabeth. The schuyler does not eat the kitty.", "logic": "\nCool(elizabeth, schuyler)\nDisplace(elizabeth, hamlin)\nCool(kitty, schuyler)\nSaponified(kitty)\nDepilous(kitty)\nCool(hamlin, kitty)\nLiteralize(schuyler, hamlin)\nforall x (Literalize(x, kitty) and Literalize(x, schuyler) -> Literalize(x, hamlin))\nforall x (Saponified(x) and Depilous(x) -> Stimulated(x))\nOppressive(kitty) and Nonnomadic(kitty) -> Literalize(kitty, hamlin)\nforall x (Saponified(x) and Stimulated(x) -> Cool(x, schuyler))\nforall x (Cool(x, elizabeth) -> Cool(elizabeth, kitty))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) and Displace(x, hamlin) -> Depilous(x))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) and Displace(x, elizabeth) -> Displace(elizabeth, hamlin))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) and Saponified(x) -> Cool(x, elizabeth))\n\nnot Cool(schuyler, kitty)\n\nnot Cool(schuyler, kitty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The layla circle the agneta. The layla hearken the lazaro. The charlotte circle the agneta. The charlotte is agnostical. The charlotte is artificial. The lazaro circle the charlotte. The agneta spotweld the lazaro. If something spotweld the charlotte and it spotweld the agneta then it spotweld the lazaro. If something is agnostical and artificial then it is pulverised. If the charlotte is polytonal and the charlotte is steaming then the charlotte spotweld the lazaro. If something is agnostical and pulverised then it circle the agneta. If something circle the layla then the layla circle the charlotte. If something is pulverised and it hearken the lazaro then it is artificial. If something is pulverised and it hearken the layla then the layla hearken the lazaro. If something is pulverised and agnostical then it circle the layla. The charlotte spotweld the charlotte.", "logic": "\nCircle(layla, agneta)\nHearken(layla, lazaro)\nCircle(charlotte, agneta)\nAgnostical(charlotte)\nArtificial(charlotte)\nCircle(lazaro, charlotte)\nSpotweld(agneta, lazaro)\nforall x (Spotweld(x, charlotte) and Spotweld(x, agneta) -> Spotweld(x, lazaro))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and Artificial(x) -> Pulverised(x))\nPolytonal(charlotte) and Steaming(charlotte) -> Spotweld(charlotte, lazaro)\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and Pulverised(x) -> Circle(x, agneta))\nforall x (Circle(x, layla) -> Circle(layla, charlotte))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) and Hearken(x, lazaro) -> Artificial(x))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) and Hearken(x, layla) -> Hearken(layla, lazaro))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) and Agnostical(x) -> Circle(x, layla))\n\nSpotweld(charlotte, charlotte)\n\nSpotweld(charlotte, charlotte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The clive anatomise the rayna. The clive itch the kate. The shelia anatomise the rayna. The shelia is amniotic. The shelia is unfueled. The kate anatomise the shelia. The rayna broaden the kate. If something broaden the shelia and it broaden the rayna then it broaden the kate. If something is amniotic and unfueled then it is successive. If the shelia is energizing and the shelia is tidal then the shelia broaden the kate. If something is amniotic and successive then it anatomise the rayna. If something anatomise the clive then the clive anatomise the shelia. If something is successive and it itch the kate then it is unfueled. If something is successive and it itch the clive then the clive itch the kate. If something is successive and amniotic then it anatomise the clive. The rayna does not need the rayna.", "logic": "\nAnatomise(clive, rayna)\nItch(clive, kate)\nAnatomise(shelia, rayna)\nAmniotic(shelia)\nUnfueled(shelia)\nAnatomise(kate, shelia)\nBroaden(rayna, kate)\nforall x (Broaden(x, shelia) and Broaden(x, rayna) -> Broaden(x, kate))\nforall x (Amniotic(x) and Unfueled(x) -> Successive(x))\nEnergizing(shelia) and Tidal(shelia) -> Broaden(shelia, kate)\nforall x (Amniotic(x) and Successive(x) -> Anatomise(x, rayna))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, clive) -> Anatomise(clive, shelia))\nforall x (Successive(x) and Itch(x, kate) -> Unfueled(x))\nforall x (Successive(x) and Itch(x, clive) -> Itch(clive, kate))\nforall x (Successive(x) and Amniotic(x) -> Anatomise(x, clive))\n\nnot Itch(rayna, rayna)\n\nnot Itch(rayna, rayna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The lenka finalize the joycelin. The lenka dissent the adam. The bernadine finalize the joycelin. The bernadine is styleless. The bernadine is inverse. The adam finalize the bernadine. The joycelin sass the adam. If something sass the bernadine and it sass the joycelin then it sass the adam. If something is styleless and inverse then it is spidery. If the bernadine is scaly and the bernadine is poignant then the bernadine sass the adam. If something is styleless and spidery then it finalize the joycelin. If something finalize the lenka then the lenka finalize the bernadine. If something is spidery and it dissent the adam then it is inverse. If something is spidery and it dissent the lenka then the lenka dissent the adam. If something is spidery and styleless then it finalize the lenka. The bernadine finalize the adam.", "logic": "\nFinalize(lenka, joycelin)\nDissent(lenka, adam)\nFinalize(bernadine, joycelin)\nStyleless(bernadine)\nInverse(bernadine)\nFinalize(adam, bernadine)\nSass(joycelin, adam)\nforall x (Sass(x, bernadine) and Sass(x, joycelin) -> Sass(x, adam))\nforall x (Styleless(x) and Inverse(x) -> Spidery(x))\nScaly(bernadine) and Poignant(bernadine) -> Sass(bernadine, adam)\nforall x (Styleless(x) and Spidery(x) -> Finalize(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Finalize(x, lenka) -> Finalize(lenka, bernadine))\nforall x (Spidery(x) and Dissent(x, adam) -> Inverse(x))\nforall x (Spidery(x) and Dissent(x, lenka) -> Dissent(lenka, adam))\nforall x (Spidery(x) and Styleless(x) -> Finalize(x, lenka))\n\nFinalize(bernadine, adam)\n\nFinalize(bernadine, adam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "Gerladina is cragged. Mignon is longhand. Scarlet is longhand. If something is broken then it is gold. All gold things are scowling. If something is longhand then it is scowling. Big, cragged things are broken. Rough things are stimulant. If something is cragged then it is helpless. If something is helpless then it is scowling. If Mignon is helpless then Mignon is cragged. Gerladina is cragged.", "logic": "\nCragged(gerladina)\nLonghand(mignon)\nLonghand(scarlet)\nforall x (Broken(x) -> Gold(x))\nforall x (Gold(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Longhand(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Longhand(x) and Cragged(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nforall x (Cragged(x) -> Helpless(x))\nforall x (Helpless(x) -> Scowling(x))\nHelpless(mignon) -> Cragged(mignon)\n\nCragged(gerladina)\n\ntherefore Cragged(gerladina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Reeva is pinched. Lusa is tamed. Otis is tamed. If something is backless then it is disjointed. All disjointed things are passerine. If something is tamed then it is passerine. Big, pinched things are backless. Rough things are paying. If something is pinched then it is eccrine. If something is eccrine then it is passerine. If Lusa is eccrine then Lusa is pinched. Reeva is not pinched.", "logic": "\nPinched(reeva)\nTamed(lusa)\nTamed(otis)\nforall x (Backless(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Passerine(x))\nforall x (Tamed(x) -> Passerine(x))\nforall x (Tamed(x) and Pinched(x) -> Backless(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Paying(x))\nforall x (Pinched(x) -> Eccrine(x))\nforall x (Eccrine(x) -> Passerine(x))\nEccrine(lusa) -> Pinched(lusa)\n\nnot Pinched(reeva)\n\ntherefore Pinched(reeva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Warner is offside. Claus is feral. Garth is feral. If something is woven then it is untrusting. All untrusting things are lactating. If something is feral then it is lactating. Big, offside things are woven. Rough things are caulked. If something is offside then it is neurotic. If something is neurotic then it is lactating. If Claus is neurotic then Claus is offside. Garth is lactating.", "logic": "\nOffside(warner)\nFeral(claus)\nFeral(garth)\nforall x (Woven(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Feral(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Feral(x) and Offside(x) -> Woven(x))\nforall x (Lactating(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Offside(x) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Lactating(x))\nNeurotic(claus) -> Offside(claus)\n\nLactating(garth)\n\nFeral(garth) and forall x (Feral(x) -> Lactating(x)) -> therefore Lactating(garth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Agneta is diverging. Barbabas is parlous. Karilynn is parlous. If something is pleasing then it is unshorn. All unshorn things are lessened. If something is parlous then it is lessened. Big, diverging things are pleasing. Rough things are tabu. If something is diverging then it is accusive. If something is accusive then it is lessened. If Barbabas is accusive then Barbabas is diverging. Barbabas is not lessened.", "logic": "\nDiverging(agneta)\nParlous(barbabas)\nParlous(karilynn)\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Unshorn(x))\nforall x (Unshorn(x) -> Lessened(x))\nforall x (Parlous(x) -> Lessened(x))\nforall x (Parlous(x) and Diverging(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Lessened(x) -> Tabu(x))\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Accusive(x) -> Lessened(x))\nAccusive(barbabas) -> Diverging(barbabas)\n\nnot Lessened(barbabas)\n\nParlous(barbabas) and forall x (Parlous(x) -> Lessened(x)) -> therefore Lessened(barbabas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Leo is computable. Frazier is infectious. Smitty is infectious. If something is maximum then it is fulfilled. All fulfilled things are shamanist. If something is infectious then it is shamanist. Big, computable things are maximum. Rough things are metabolic. If something is computable then it is mouldy. If something is mouldy then it is shamanist. If Frazier is mouldy then Frazier is computable. Smitty is metabolic.", "logic": "\nComputable(leo)\nInfectious(frazier)\nInfectious(smitty)\nforall x (Maximum(x) -> Fulfilled(x))\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) and Computable(x) -> Maximum(x))\nforall x (Shamanist(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Computable(x) -> Mouldy(x))\nforall x (Mouldy(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nMouldy(frazier) -> Computable(frazier)\n\nMetabolic(smitty)\n\nInfectious(smitty) and forall x (Infectious(x) -> Shamanist(x)) -> therefore Shamanist(smitty) Shamanist(smitty) and forall x (Shamanist(x) -> Metabolic(x)) -> therefore Metabolic(smitty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Ivonne is petrous. Annabella is actinic. Wilek is actinic. If something is twilight then it is undrained. All undrained things are geologic. If something is actinic then it is geologic. Big, petrous things are twilight. Rough things are crested. If something is petrous then it is cavitied. If something is cavitied then it is geologic. If Annabella is cavitied then Annabella is petrous. Ivonne is not geologic.", "logic": "\nPetrous(ivonne)\nActinic(annabella)\nActinic(wilek)\nforall x (Twilight(x) -> Undrained(x))\nforall x (Undrained(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Actinic(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Actinic(x) and Petrous(x) -> Twilight(x))\nforall x (Geologic(x) -> Crested(x))\nforall x (Petrous(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Cavitied(x) -> Geologic(x))\nCavitied(annabella) -> Petrous(annabella)\n\nnot Geologic(ivonne)\n\nPetrous(ivonne) and forall x (Petrous(x) -> Cavitied(x)) -> therefore Cavitied(ivonne) Cavitied(ivonne) and forall x (Cavitied(x) -> Geologic(x)) -> therefore Geologic(ivonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Barnaby is near. Marcel is dazzled. Micheal is dazzled. If something is impenitent then it is minimized. All minimized things are focussed. If something is dazzled then it is focussed. Big, near things are impenitent. Rough things are cyan. If something is near then it is lendable. If something is lendable then it is focussed. If Marcel is lendable then Marcel is near. Barnaby is cyan.", "logic": "\nNear(barnaby)\nDazzled(marcel)\nDazzled(micheal)\nforall x (Impenitent(x) -> Minimized(x))\nforall x (Minimized(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) and Near(x) -> Impenitent(x))\nforall x (Focussed(x) -> Cyan(x))\nforall x (Near(x) -> Lendable(x))\nforall x (Lendable(x) -> Focussed(x))\nLendable(marcel) -> Near(marcel)\n\nCyan(barnaby)\n\nNear(barnaby) and forall x (Near(x) -> Lendable(x)) -> therefore Lendable(barnaby) Lendable(barnaby) and forall x (Lendable(x) -> Focussed(x)) -> therefore Focussed(barnaby) Focussed(barnaby) and forall x (Focussed(x) -> Cyan(x)) -> therefore Cyan(barnaby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Marcellus is back. Danika is murmuring. Helmuth is murmuring. If something is semiweekly then it is brocaded. All brocaded things are growing. If something is murmuring then it is growing. Big, back things are semiweekly. Rough things are veteran. If something is back then it is entozoan. If something is entozoan then it is growing. If Danika is entozoan then Danika is back. Marcellus is not veteran.", "logic": "\nBack(marcellus)\nMurmuring(danika)\nMurmuring(helmuth)\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Brocaded(x))\nforall x (Brocaded(x) -> Growing(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) -> Growing(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) and Back(x) -> Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Growing(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Back(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Growing(x))\nEntozoan(danika) -> Back(danika)\n\nnot Veteran(marcellus)\n\nBack(marcellus) and forall x (Back(x) -> Entozoan(x)) -> therefore Entozoan(marcellus) Entozoan(marcellus) and forall x (Entozoan(x) -> Growing(x)) -> therefore Growing(marcellus) Growing(marcellus) and forall x (Growing(x) -> Veteran(x)) -> therefore Veteran(marcellus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Mendel is oxidised. Octavia is futuristic. Dwaine is futuristic. If something is sectarian then it is meteoric. All meteoric things are ephesian. If something is futuristic then it is ephesian. Big, oxidised things are sectarian. Rough things are ferial. If something is oxidised then it is debased. If something is debased then it is ephesian. If Octavia is debased then Octavia is oxidised. Octavia is not debased.", "logic": "\nOxidised(mendel)\nFuturistic(octavia)\nFuturistic(dwaine)\nforall x (Sectarian(x) -> Meteoric(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Futuristic(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Futuristic(x) and Oxidised(x) -> Sectarian(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Oxidised(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nDebased(octavia) -> Oxidised(octavia)\n\nnot Debased(octavia)\n\nforall x (Oxidised(x) -> Debased(x)) <- Debased(octavia) -> Oxidised(octavia) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Gwendolyn is circadian. Arvy is ischaemic. Erina is ischaemic. If something is niggling then it is candied. All candied things are damnatory. If something is ischaemic then it is damnatory. Big, circadian things are niggling. Rough things are unmoved. If something is circadian then it is bittie. If something is bittie then it is damnatory. If Arvy is bittie then Arvy is circadian. Gwendolyn is candied.", "logic": "\nCircadian(gwendolyn)\nIschaemic(arvy)\nIschaemic(erina)\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Candied(x))\nforall x (Candied(x) -> Damnatory(x))\nforall x (Ischaemic(x) -> Damnatory(x))\nforall x (Ischaemic(x) and Circadian(x) -> Niggling(x))\nforall x (Damnatory(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Circadian(x) -> Bittie(x))\nforall x (Bittie(x) -> Damnatory(x))\nBittie(arvy) -> Circadian(arvy)\n\nCandied(gwendolyn)\n\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Candied(x)) <- forall x (Ischaemic(x) and Circadian(x) -> Niggling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Jenette is whatever. Cris is mythologic. Maryann is mythologic. If something is botanic then it is loco. All loco things are curricular. If something is mythologic then it is curricular. Big, whatever things are botanic. Rough things are unhealed. If something is whatever then it is daily. If something is daily then it is curricular. If Cris is daily then Cris is whatever. Cris is not whatever.", "logic": "\nWhatever(jenette)\nMythologic(cris)\nMythologic(maryann)\nforall x (Botanic(x) -> Loco(x))\nforall x (Loco(x) -> Curricular(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) -> Curricular(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Whatever(x) -> Botanic(x))\nforall x (Curricular(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Whatever(x) -> Daily(x))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Curricular(x))\nDaily(cris) -> Whatever(cris)\n\nnot Whatever(cris)\n\nDaily(cris) -> Whatever(cris) <- forall x (Whatever(x) -> Daily(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Tobiah is relaxant. Theressa is endowed. Abigale is endowed. If something is winsome then it is abatable. All abatable things are demotic. If something is endowed then it is demotic. Big, relaxant things are winsome. Rough things are inclement. If something is relaxant then it is streaky. If something is streaky then it is demotic. If Theressa is streaky then Theressa is relaxant. Abigale is winsome.", "logic": "\nRelaxant(tobiah)\nEndowed(theressa)\nEndowed(abigale)\nforall x (Winsome(x) -> Abatable(x))\nforall x (Abatable(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) and Relaxant(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Inclement(x))\nforall x (Relaxant(x) -> Streaky(x))\nforall x (Streaky(x) -> Demotic(x))\nStreaky(theressa) -> Relaxant(theressa)\n\nWinsome(abigale)\n\nforall x (Endowed(x) and Relaxant(x) -> Winsome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Salvatore is blabby. Sheree is unshared. Hana is unshared. If something is lecherous then it is viscous. All viscous things are lopsided. If something is unshared then it is lopsided. Big, blabby things are lecherous. Rough things are socratic. If something is blabby then it is carboxylic. If something is carboxylic then it is lopsided. If Sheree is carboxylic then Sheree is blabby. Hana is not blabby.", "logic": "\nBlabby(salvatore)\nUnshared(sheree)\nUnshared(hana)\nforall x (Lecherous(x) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Viscous(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Unshared(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Unshared(x) and Blabby(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Socratic(x))\nforall x (Blabby(x) -> Carboxylic(x))\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nCarboxylic(sheree) -> Blabby(sheree)\n\nnot Blabby(hana)\n\nnot Blabby(hana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Adrian is definable. Rianon is dismaying. Melva is dismaying. If something is affixial then it is shellproof. All shellproof things are neckless. If something is dismaying then it is neckless. Big, definable things are affixial. Rough things are sandalled. If something is definable then it is cumulative. If something is cumulative then it is neckless. If Rianon is cumulative then Rianon is definable. Adrian is dismaying.", "logic": "\nDefinable(adrian)\nDismaying(rianon)\nDismaying(melva)\nforall x (Affixial(x) -> Shellproof(x))\nforall x (Shellproof(x) -> Neckless(x))\nforall x (Dismaying(x) -> Neckless(x))\nforall x (Dismaying(x) and Definable(x) -> Affixial(x))\nforall x (Neckless(x) -> Sandalled(x))\nforall x (Definable(x) -> Cumulative(x))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) -> Neckless(x))\nCumulative(rianon) -> Definable(rianon)\n\nDismaying(adrian)\n\nDismaying(adrian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Neville is apnoeic. Neville is exploded. Neville is stuporous. Neville is assisted. Neville is paradisal. Neville is sellable. Benetta is apnoeic. Benetta is tegular. Jessy is apnoeic. Jessy is exploded. Jessy is stuporous. Jessy is assisted. Jessy is paradisal. Jessy is sellable. Jessy is tegular. If Jessy is stuporous then Jessy is paradisal. If Neville is exploded and Neville is stuporous then Neville is sellable. Green, apnoeic things are assisted. All tegular things are apnoeic. If something is exploded then it is tegular. Big things are stuporous. All paradisal, assisted things are stuporous. If something is apnoeic and assisted then it is sellable. Jessy is sellable.", "logic": "\nApnoeic(neville)\nExploded(neville)\nStuporous(neville)\nAssisted(neville)\nParadisal(neville)\nSellable(neville)\nApnoeic(benetta)\nTegular(benetta)\nApnoeic(jessy)\nExploded(jessy)\nStuporous(jessy)\nAssisted(jessy)\nParadisal(jessy)\nSellable(jessy)\nTegular(jessy)\nStuporous(jessy) -> Paradisal(jessy)\nExploded(neville) and Stuporous(neville) -> Sellable(neville)\nforall x (Stuporous(x) and Apnoeic(x) -> Assisted(x))\nforall x (Tegular(x) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Tegular(x))\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Paradisal(x) and Assisted(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) and Assisted(x) -> Sellable(x))\n\nSellable(jessy)\n\ntherefore Sellable(jessy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Shoshanna is begrimed. Shoshanna is permanent. Shoshanna is roseate. Shoshanna is leading. Shoshanna is mohammedan. Shoshanna is taped. Merrilee is begrimed. Merrilee is ecstatic. Marley is begrimed. Marley is permanent. Marley is roseate. Marley is leading. Marley is mohammedan. Marley is taped. Marley is ecstatic. If Marley is roseate then Marley is mohammedan. If Shoshanna is permanent and Shoshanna is roseate then Shoshanna is taped. Green, begrimed things are leading. All ecstatic things are begrimed. If something is permanent then it is ecstatic. Big things are roseate. All mohammedan, leading things are roseate. If something is begrimed and leading then it is taped. Shoshanna is not mohammedan.", "logic": "\nBegrimed(shoshanna)\nPermanent(shoshanna)\nRoseate(shoshanna)\nLeading(shoshanna)\nMohammedan(shoshanna)\nTaped(shoshanna)\nBegrimed(merrilee)\nEcstatic(merrilee)\nBegrimed(marley)\nPermanent(marley)\nRoseate(marley)\nLeading(marley)\nMohammedan(marley)\nTaped(marley)\nEcstatic(marley)\nRoseate(marley) -> Mohammedan(marley)\nPermanent(shoshanna) and Roseate(shoshanna) -> Taped(shoshanna)\nforall x (Roseate(x) and Begrimed(x) -> Leading(x))\nforall x (Ecstatic(x) -> Begrimed(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Ecstatic(x))\nforall x (Begrimed(x) -> Roseate(x))\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) and Leading(x) -> Roseate(x))\nforall x (Begrimed(x) and Leading(x) -> Taped(x))\n\nnot Mohammedan(shoshanna)\n\ntherefore Mohammedan(shoshanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Otha is barrelled. Otha is adonic. Otha is sonsie. Otha is triplex. Otha is minus. Otha is glued. Linnea is barrelled. Linnea is mauve. Tera is barrelled. Tera is adonic. Tera is sonsie. Tera is triplex. Tera is minus. Tera is glued. Tera is mauve. If Tera is sonsie then Tera is minus. If Otha is adonic and Otha is sonsie then Otha is glued. Green, barrelled things are triplex. All mauve things are barrelled. If something is adonic then it is mauve. Big things are sonsie. All minus, triplex things are sonsie. If something is barrelled and triplex then it is glued. Linnea is sonsie.", "logic": "\nBarrelled(otha)\nAdonic(otha)\nSonsie(otha)\nTriplex(otha)\nMinus(otha)\nGlued(otha)\nBarrelled(linnea)\nMauve(linnea)\nBarrelled(tera)\nAdonic(tera)\nSonsie(tera)\nTriplex(tera)\nMinus(tera)\nGlued(tera)\nMauve(tera)\nSonsie(tera) -> Minus(tera)\nAdonic(otha) and Sonsie(otha) -> Glued(otha)\nforall x (Sonsie(x) and Barrelled(x) -> Triplex(x))\nforall x (Mauve(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nforall x (Adonic(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Barrelled(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Minus(x) and Triplex(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Barrelled(x) and Triplex(x) -> Glued(x))\n\nSonsie(linnea)\n\nBarrelled(linnea) and forall x (Barrelled(x) -> Sonsie(x)) -> therefore Sonsie(linnea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Chance is mistreated. Chance is mysterious. Chance is slanderous. Chance is inductive. Chance is unaerated. Chance is intrastate. Taylor is mistreated. Taylor is sectarian. Lorraine is mistreated. Lorraine is mysterious. Lorraine is slanderous. Lorraine is inductive. Lorraine is unaerated. Lorraine is intrastate. Lorraine is sectarian. If Lorraine is slanderous then Lorraine is unaerated. If Chance is mysterious and Chance is slanderous then Chance is intrastate. Green, mistreated things are inductive. All sectarian things are mistreated. If something is mysterious then it is sectarian. Big things are slanderous. All unaerated, inductive things are slanderous. If something is mistreated and inductive then it is intrastate. Chance is not sectarian.", "logic": "\nMistreated(chance)\nMysterious(chance)\nSlanderous(chance)\nInductive(chance)\nUnaerated(chance)\nIntrastate(chance)\nMistreated(taylor)\nSectarian(taylor)\nMistreated(lorraine)\nMysterious(lorraine)\nSlanderous(lorraine)\nInductive(lorraine)\nUnaerated(lorraine)\nIntrastate(lorraine)\nSectarian(lorraine)\nSlanderous(lorraine) -> Unaerated(lorraine)\nMysterious(chance) and Slanderous(chance) -> Intrastate(chance)\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Mistreated(x) -> Inductive(x))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) -> Mistreated(x))\nforall x (Mysterious(x) -> Sectarian(x))\nforall x (Mistreated(x) -> Slanderous(x))\nforall x (Unaerated(x) and Inductive(x) -> Slanderous(x))\nforall x (Mistreated(x) and Inductive(x) -> Intrastate(x))\n\nnot Sectarian(chance)\n\nMysterious(chance) and forall x (Mysterious(x) -> Sectarian(x)) -> therefore Sectarian(chance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Wendie is dependent. Wendie is unbeknown. Wendie is uninfected. Wendie is pilar. Wendie is global. Wendie is epizoic. Annmaria is dependent. Annmaria is undated. Analise is dependent. Analise is unbeknown. Analise is uninfected. Analise is pilar. Analise is global. Analise is epizoic. Analise is undated. If Analise is uninfected then Analise is global. If Wendie is unbeknown and Wendie is uninfected then Wendie is epizoic. Green, dependent things are pilar. All undated things are dependent. If something is unbeknown then it is undated. Big things are uninfected. All global, pilar things are uninfected. If something is dependent and pilar then it is epizoic. Annmaria is pilar.", "logic": "\nDependent(wendie)\nUnbeknown(wendie)\nUninfected(wendie)\nPilar(wendie)\nGlobal(wendie)\nEpizoic(wendie)\nDependent(annmaria)\nUndated(annmaria)\nDependent(analise)\nUnbeknown(analise)\nUninfected(analise)\nPilar(analise)\nGlobal(analise)\nEpizoic(analise)\nUndated(analise)\nUninfected(analise) -> Global(analise)\nUnbeknown(wendie) and Uninfected(wendie) -> Epizoic(wendie)\nforall x (Uninfected(x) and Dependent(x) -> Pilar(x))\nforall x (Undated(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) -> Undated(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Uninfected(x))\nforall x (Global(x) and Pilar(x) -> Uninfected(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) and Pilar(x) -> Epizoic(x))\n\nPilar(annmaria)\n\nDependent(annmaria) and forall x (Dependent(x) -> Uninfected(x)) -> therefore Uninfected(annmaria) Uninfected(annmaria) and Dependent(annmaria) and forall x (Uninfected(x) and Dependent(x) -> Pilar(x)) -> therefore Pilar(annmaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Stacia is blae. Stacia is frantic. Stacia is evanescent. Stacia is catechetic. Stacia is seeded. Stacia is matt. Margareta is blae. Margareta is diffuse. Rodrique is blae. Rodrique is frantic. Rodrique is evanescent. Rodrique is catechetic. Rodrique is seeded. Rodrique is matt. Rodrique is diffuse. If Rodrique is evanescent then Rodrique is seeded. If Stacia is frantic and Stacia is evanescent then Stacia is matt. Green, blae things are catechetic. All diffuse things are blae. If something is frantic then it is diffuse. Big things are evanescent. All seeded, catechetic things are evanescent. If something is blae and catechetic then it is matt. Margareta is not catechetic.", "logic": "\nBlae(stacia)\nFrantic(stacia)\nEvanescent(stacia)\nCatechetic(stacia)\nSeeded(stacia)\nMatt(stacia)\nBlae(margareta)\nDiffuse(margareta)\nBlae(rodrique)\nFrantic(rodrique)\nEvanescent(rodrique)\nCatechetic(rodrique)\nSeeded(rodrique)\nMatt(rodrique)\nDiffuse(rodrique)\nEvanescent(rodrique) -> Seeded(rodrique)\nFrantic(stacia) and Evanescent(stacia) -> Matt(stacia)\nforall x (Evanescent(x) and Blae(x) -> Catechetic(x))\nforall x (Diffuse(x) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Frantic(x) -> Diffuse(x))\nforall x (Blae(x) -> Evanescent(x))\nforall x (Seeded(x) and Catechetic(x) -> Evanescent(x))\nforall x (Blae(x) and Catechetic(x) -> Matt(x))\n\nnot Catechetic(margareta)\n\nBlae(margareta) and forall x (Blae(x) -> Evanescent(x)) -> therefore Evanescent(margareta) Evanescent(margareta) and Blae(margareta) and forall x (Evanescent(x) and Blae(x) -> Catechetic(x)) -> therefore Catechetic(margareta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Adah is intestinal. Adah is coequal. Adah is expiatory. Adah is frothy. Adah is blond. Adah is hypethral. Jeanna is intestinal. Jeanna is cushiony. Douglis is intestinal. Douglis is coequal. Douglis is expiatory. Douglis is frothy. Douglis is blond. Douglis is hypethral. Douglis is cushiony. If Douglis is expiatory then Douglis is blond. If Adah is coequal and Adah is expiatory then Adah is hypethral. Green, intestinal things are frothy. All cushiony things are intestinal. If something is coequal then it is cushiony. Big things are expiatory. All blond, frothy things are expiatory. If something is intestinal and frothy then it is hypethral. Jeanna is hypethral.", "logic": "\nIntestinal(adah)\nCoequal(adah)\nExpiatory(adah)\nFrothy(adah)\nBlond(adah)\nHypethral(adah)\nIntestinal(jeanna)\nCushiony(jeanna)\nIntestinal(douglis)\nCoequal(douglis)\nExpiatory(douglis)\nFrothy(douglis)\nBlond(douglis)\nHypethral(douglis)\nCushiony(douglis)\nExpiatory(douglis) -> Blond(douglis)\nCoequal(adah) and Expiatory(adah) -> Hypethral(adah)\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and Intestinal(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Cushiony(x) -> Intestinal(x))\nforall x (Coequal(x) -> Cushiony(x))\nforall x (Intestinal(x) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) and Frothy(x) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Intestinal(x) and Frothy(x) -> Hypethral(x))\n\nHypethral(jeanna)\n\nIntestinal(jeanna) and forall x (Intestinal(x) -> Expiatory(x)) -> therefore Expiatory(jeanna) Expiatory(jeanna) and Intestinal(jeanna) and forall x (Expiatory(x) and Intestinal(x) -> Frothy(x)) -> therefore Frothy(jeanna) Intestinal(jeanna) and Frothy(jeanna) and forall x (Intestinal(x) and Frothy(x) -> Hypethral(x)) -> therefore Hypethral(jeanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Sal is hoydenish. Sal is jangly. Sal is mercurial. Sal is spanking. Sal is assurgent. Sal is ceaseless. Tova is hoydenish. Tova is shrieked. Livia is hoydenish. Livia is jangly. Livia is mercurial. Livia is spanking. Livia is assurgent. Livia is ceaseless. Livia is shrieked. If Livia is mercurial then Livia is assurgent. If Sal is jangly and Sal is mercurial then Sal is ceaseless. Green, hoydenish things are spanking. All shrieked things are hoydenish. If something is jangly then it is shrieked. Big things are mercurial. All assurgent, spanking things are mercurial. If something is hoydenish and spanking then it is ceaseless. Tova is not ceaseless.", "logic": "\nHoydenish(sal)\nJangly(sal)\nMercurial(sal)\nSpanking(sal)\nAssurgent(sal)\nCeaseless(sal)\nHoydenish(tova)\nShrieked(tova)\nHoydenish(livia)\nJangly(livia)\nMercurial(livia)\nSpanking(livia)\nAssurgent(livia)\nCeaseless(livia)\nShrieked(livia)\nMercurial(livia) -> Assurgent(livia)\nJangly(sal) and Mercurial(sal) -> Ceaseless(sal)\nforall x (Mercurial(x) and Hoydenish(x) -> Spanking(x))\nforall x (Shrieked(x) -> Hoydenish(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) -> Shrieked(x))\nforall x (Hoydenish(x) -> Mercurial(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) and Spanking(x) -> Mercurial(x))\nforall x (Hoydenish(x) and Spanking(x) -> Ceaseless(x))\n\nnot Ceaseless(tova)\n\nHoydenish(tova) and forall x (Hoydenish(x) -> Mercurial(x)) -> therefore Mercurial(tova) Mercurial(tova) and Hoydenish(tova) and forall x (Mercurial(x) and Hoydenish(x) -> Spanking(x)) -> therefore Spanking(tova) Hoydenish(tova) and Spanking(tova) and forall x (Hoydenish(x) and Spanking(x) -> Ceaseless(x)) -> therefore Ceaseless(tova)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Berte is bedrid. Berte is spinose. Berte is aeonian. Berte is ranging. Berte is downbound. Berte is edematous. Abbott is bedrid. Abbott is pharaonic. Lilah is bedrid. Lilah is spinose. Lilah is aeonian. Lilah is ranging. Lilah is downbound. Lilah is edematous. Lilah is pharaonic. If Lilah is aeonian then Lilah is downbound. If Berte is spinose and Berte is aeonian then Berte is edematous. Green, bedrid things are ranging. All pharaonic things are bedrid. If something is spinose then it is pharaonic. Big things are aeonian. All downbound, ranging things are aeonian. If something is bedrid and ranging then it is edematous. Abbott is not spinose.", "logic": "\nBedrid(berte)\nSpinose(berte)\nAeonian(berte)\nRanging(berte)\nDownbound(berte)\nEdematous(berte)\nBedrid(abbott)\nPharaonic(abbott)\nBedrid(lilah)\nSpinose(lilah)\nAeonian(lilah)\nRanging(lilah)\nDownbound(lilah)\nEdematous(lilah)\nPharaonic(lilah)\nAeonian(lilah) -> Downbound(lilah)\nSpinose(berte) and Aeonian(berte) -> Edematous(berte)\nforall x (Aeonian(x) and Bedrid(x) -> Ranging(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Bedrid(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Downbound(x) and Ranging(x) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and Ranging(x) -> Edematous(x))\n\nnot Spinose(abbott)\n\nnot Spinose(abbott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Hellene is thievish. Hellene is mullioned. Hellene is ninety. Hellene is vociferous. Hellene is unrentable. Hellene is grooved. Madelina is thievish. Madelina is tardive. Dannie is thievish. Dannie is mullioned. Dannie is ninety. Dannie is vociferous. Dannie is unrentable. Dannie is grooved. Dannie is tardive. If Dannie is ninety then Dannie is unrentable. If Hellene is mullioned and Hellene is ninety then Hellene is grooved. Green, thievish things are vociferous. All tardive things are thievish. If something is mullioned then it is tardive. Big things are ninety. All unrentable, vociferous things are ninety. If something is thievish and vociferous then it is grooved. Madelina is unrentable.", "logic": "\nThievish(hellene)\nMullioned(hellene)\nNinety(hellene)\nVociferous(hellene)\nUnrentable(hellene)\nGrooved(hellene)\nThievish(madelina)\nTardive(madelina)\nThievish(dannie)\nMullioned(dannie)\nNinety(dannie)\nVociferous(dannie)\nUnrentable(dannie)\nGrooved(dannie)\nTardive(dannie)\nNinety(dannie) -> Unrentable(dannie)\nMullioned(hellene) and Ninety(hellene) -> Grooved(hellene)\nforall x (Ninety(x) and Thievish(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Tardive(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Mullioned(x) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Thievish(x) -> Ninety(x))\nforall x (Unrentable(x) and Vociferous(x) -> Ninety(x))\nforall x (Thievish(x) and Vociferous(x) -> Grooved(x))\n\nUnrentable(madelina)\n\nUnrentable(madelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "The bellina reenforce the georgeta. The bellina wipe the tilda. The bellina is not ratty. The bellina is unlike. The bellina sicken the tilda. The bellina does not need the georgeta. The tilda is not contracted. The tilda is humorless. The tilda does not need the bellina. The georgeta reenforce the bellina. The georgeta wipe the bellina. The georgeta sicken the bellina. If someone reenforce the georgeta then the georgeta is doped. If someone is ratty and they need the tilda then they eat the georgeta. If someone reenforce the georgeta then they do not chase the tilda. If someone reenforce the bellina and they are doped then they chase the georgeta. If the tilda is not ratty and the tilda does not need the bellina then the bellina sicken the tilda. If someone sicken the bellina and the bellina wipe the georgeta then the georgeta is unlike. The tilda is humorless.", "logic": "\nReenforce(bellina, georgeta)\nWipe(bellina, tilda)\nnot Ratty(bellina)\nUnlike(bellina)\nSicken(bellina, tilda)\nnot Sicken(bellina, georgeta)\nnot Contracted(tilda)\nHumorless(tilda)\nnot Sicken(tilda, bellina)\nReenforce(georgeta, bellina)\nWipe(georgeta, bellina)\nSicken(georgeta, bellina)\nforall x (Reenforce(x, georgeta) -> Doped(georgeta))\nforall x (Ratty(x) and Sicken(x, tilda) -> Wipe(x, georgeta))\nforall x (Reenforce(x, georgeta) -> not Reenforce(x, tilda))\nforall x (Reenforce(x, bellina) and Doped(x) -> Reenforce(x, georgeta))\nnot Ratty(tilda) and not Sicken(tilda, bellina) -> Sicken(bellina, tilda)\nforall x (Sicken(x, bellina) and Wipe(bellina, georgeta) -> Unlike(georgeta))\n\nHumorless(tilda)\n\ntherefore Humorless(tilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The simonne fuck the jerrine. The simonne shrill the sara. The simonne is not uncleared. The simonne is patriotic. The simonne remit the sara. The simonne does not need the jerrine. The sara is not stemmed. The sara is surmisable. The sara does not need the simonne. The jerrine fuck the simonne. The jerrine shrill the simonne. The jerrine remit the simonne. If someone fuck the jerrine then the jerrine is prevalent. If someone is uncleared and they need the sara then they eat the jerrine. If someone fuck the jerrine then they do not chase the sara. If someone fuck the simonne and they are prevalent then they chase the jerrine. If the sara is not uncleared and the sara does not need the simonne then the simonne remit the sara. If someone remit the simonne and the simonne shrill the jerrine then the jerrine is patriotic. The sara is not surmisable.", "logic": "\nFuck(simonne, jerrine)\nShrill(simonne, sara)\nnot Uncleared(simonne)\nPatriotic(simonne)\nRemit(simonne, sara)\nnot Remit(simonne, jerrine)\nnot Stemmed(sara)\nSurmisable(sara)\nnot Remit(sara, simonne)\nFuck(jerrine, simonne)\nShrill(jerrine, simonne)\nRemit(jerrine, simonne)\nforall x (Fuck(x, jerrine) -> Prevalent(jerrine))\nforall x (Uncleared(x) and Remit(x, sara) -> Shrill(x, jerrine))\nforall x (Fuck(x, jerrine) -> not Fuck(x, sara))\nforall x (Fuck(x, simonne) and Prevalent(x) -> Fuck(x, jerrine))\nnot Uncleared(sara) and not Remit(sara, simonne) -> Remit(simonne, sara)\nforall x (Remit(x, simonne) and Shrill(simonne, jerrine) -> Patriotic(jerrine))\n\nnot Surmisable(sara)\n\ntherefore Surmisable(sara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The nigel skulk the verina. The nigel bell the lanette. The nigel is not macerative. The nigel is nonthermal. The nigel conceal the lanette. The nigel does not need the verina. The lanette is not striped. The lanette is gratis. The lanette does not need the nigel. The verina skulk the nigel. The verina bell the nigel. The verina conceal the nigel. If someone skulk the verina then the verina is languorous. If someone is macerative and they need the lanette then they eat the verina. If someone skulk the verina then they do not chase the lanette. If someone skulk the nigel and they are languorous then they chase the verina. If the lanette is not macerative and the lanette does not need the nigel then the nigel conceal the lanette. If someone conceal the nigel and the nigel bell the verina then the verina is nonthermal. The verina is languorous.", "logic": "\nSkulk(nigel, verina)\nBell(nigel, lanette)\nnot Macerative(nigel)\nNonthermal(nigel)\nConceal(nigel, lanette)\nnot Conceal(nigel, verina)\nnot Striped(lanette)\nGratis(lanette)\nnot Conceal(lanette, nigel)\nSkulk(verina, nigel)\nBell(verina, nigel)\nConceal(verina, nigel)\nforall x (Skulk(x, verina) -> Languorous(verina))\nforall x (Macerative(x) and Conceal(x, lanette) -> Bell(x, verina))\nforall x (Skulk(x, verina) -> not Skulk(x, lanette))\nforall x (Skulk(x, nigel) and Languorous(x) -> Skulk(x, verina))\nnot Macerative(lanette) and not Conceal(lanette, nigel) -> Conceal(nigel, lanette)\nforall x (Conceal(x, nigel) and Bell(nigel, verina) -> Nonthermal(verina))\n\nLanguorous(verina)\n\nSkulk(nigel, verina) and forall x (Skulk(x, verina) -> Languorous(verina)) -> therefore Languorous(verina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The waldemar admix the cosetta. The waldemar bedevil the meyer. The waldemar is not sublime. The waldemar is blushing. The waldemar hyphenate the meyer. The waldemar does not need the cosetta. The meyer is not plangent. The meyer is textual. The meyer does not need the waldemar. The cosetta admix the waldemar. The cosetta bedevil the waldemar. The cosetta hyphenate the waldemar. If someone admix the cosetta then the cosetta is regretful. If someone is sublime and they need the meyer then they eat the cosetta. If someone admix the cosetta then they do not chase the meyer. If someone admix the waldemar and they are regretful then they chase the cosetta. If the meyer is not sublime and the meyer does not need the waldemar then the waldemar hyphenate the meyer. If someone hyphenate the waldemar and the waldemar bedevil the cosetta then the cosetta is blushing. The waldemar admix the meyer.", "logic": "\nAdmix(waldemar, cosetta)\nBedevil(waldemar, meyer)\nnot Sublime(waldemar)\nBlushing(waldemar)\nHyphenate(waldemar, meyer)\nnot Hyphenate(waldemar, cosetta)\nnot Plangent(meyer)\nTextual(meyer)\nnot Hyphenate(meyer, waldemar)\nAdmix(cosetta, waldemar)\nBedevil(cosetta, waldemar)\nHyphenate(cosetta, waldemar)\nforall x (Admix(x, cosetta) -> Regretful(cosetta))\nforall x (Sublime(x) and Hyphenate(x, meyer) -> Bedevil(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Admix(x, cosetta) -> not Admix(x, meyer))\nforall x (Admix(x, waldemar) and Regretful(x) -> Admix(x, cosetta))\nnot Sublime(meyer) and not Hyphenate(meyer, waldemar) -> Hyphenate(waldemar, meyer)\nforall x (Hyphenate(x, waldemar) and Bedevil(waldemar, cosetta) -> Blushing(cosetta))\n\nAdmix(waldemar, meyer)\n\nAdmix(waldemar, cosetta) and forall x (Admix(x, cosetta) -> not Admix(x, meyer)) -> therefore not Admix(waldemar, meyer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The sharai instal the ora. The sharai glitter the hebert. The sharai is not laurelled. The sharai is carboxylic. The sharai peculate the hebert. The sharai does not need the ora. The hebert is not burrlike. The hebert is demure. The hebert does not need the sharai. The ora instal the sharai. The ora glitter the sharai. The ora peculate the sharai. If someone instal the ora then the ora is nonextant. If someone is laurelled and they need the hebert then they eat the ora. If someone instal the ora then they do not chase the hebert. If someone instal the sharai and they are nonextant then they chase the ora. If the hebert is not laurelled and the hebert does not need the sharai then the sharai peculate the hebert. If someone peculate the sharai and the sharai glitter the ora then the ora is carboxylic. The ora instal the ora.", "logic": "\nInstal(sharai, ora)\nGlitter(sharai, hebert)\nnot Laurelled(sharai)\nCarboxylic(sharai)\nPeculate(sharai, hebert)\nnot Peculate(sharai, ora)\nnot Burrlike(hebert)\nDemure(hebert)\nnot Peculate(hebert, sharai)\nInstal(ora, sharai)\nGlitter(ora, sharai)\nPeculate(ora, sharai)\nforall x (Instal(x, ora) -> Nonextant(ora))\nforall x (Laurelled(x) and Peculate(x, hebert) -> Glitter(x, ora))\nforall x (Instal(x, ora) -> not Instal(x, hebert))\nforall x (Instal(x, sharai) and Nonextant(x) -> Instal(x, ora))\nnot Laurelled(hebert) and not Peculate(hebert, sharai) -> Peculate(sharai, hebert)\nforall x (Peculate(x, sharai) and Glitter(sharai, ora) -> Carboxylic(ora))\n\nInstal(ora, ora)\n\nInstal(sharai, ora) and forall x (Instal(x, ora) -> Nonextant(ora)) -> therefore Nonextant(ora) Instal(ora, sharai) and Nonextant(ora) and forall x (Instal(x, sharai) and Nonextant(x) -> Instal(x, ora)) -> therefore Instal(ora, ora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The shelbi sterilise the pavla. The shelbi frog the jule. The shelbi is not unswept. The shelbi is louche. The shelbi homologise the jule. The shelbi does not need the pavla. The jule is not trifid. The jule is idiopathic. The jule does not need the shelbi. The pavla sterilise the shelbi. The pavla frog the shelbi. The pavla homologise the shelbi. If someone sterilise the pavla then the pavla is ohmic. If someone is unswept and they need the jule then they eat the pavla. If someone sterilise the pavla then they do not chase the jule. If someone sterilise the shelbi and they are ohmic then they chase the pavla. If the jule is not unswept and the jule does not need the shelbi then the shelbi homologise the jule. If someone homologise the shelbi and the shelbi frog the pavla then the pavla is louche. The pavla does not chase the pavla.", "logic": "\nSterilise(shelbi, pavla)\nFrog(shelbi, jule)\nnot Unswept(shelbi)\nLouche(shelbi)\nHomologise(shelbi, jule)\nnot Homologise(shelbi, pavla)\nnot Trifid(jule)\nIdiopathic(jule)\nnot Homologise(jule, shelbi)\nSterilise(pavla, shelbi)\nFrog(pavla, shelbi)\nHomologise(pavla, shelbi)\nforall x (Sterilise(x, pavla) -> Ohmic(pavla))\nforall x (Unswept(x) and Homologise(x, jule) -> Frog(x, pavla))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, pavla) -> not Sterilise(x, jule))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, shelbi) and Ohmic(x) -> Sterilise(x, pavla))\nnot Unswept(jule) and not Homologise(jule, shelbi) -> Homologise(shelbi, jule)\nforall x (Homologise(x, shelbi) and Frog(shelbi, pavla) -> Louche(pavla))\n\nnot Sterilise(pavla, pavla)\n\nSterilise(shelbi, pavla) and forall x (Sterilise(x, pavla) -> Ohmic(pavla)) -> therefore Ohmic(pavla) Sterilise(pavla, shelbi) and Ohmic(pavla) and forall x (Sterilise(x, shelbi) and Ohmic(x) -> Sterilise(x, pavla)) -> therefore Sterilise(pavla, pavla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The alma scuffle the arvie. The alma paraphrase the letti. The alma is not craven. The alma is hydrous. The alma solo the letti. The alma does not need the arvie. The letti is not pleading. The letti is momentous. The letti does not need the alma. The arvie scuffle the alma. The arvie paraphrase the alma. The arvie solo the alma. If someone scuffle the arvie then the arvie is fricative. If someone is craven and they need the letti then they eat the arvie. If someone scuffle the arvie then they do not chase the letti. If someone scuffle the alma and they are fricative then they chase the arvie. If the letti is not craven and the letti does not need the alma then the alma solo the letti. If someone solo the alma and the alma paraphrase the arvie then the arvie is hydrous. The arvie does not chase the letti.", "logic": "\nScuffle(alma, arvie)\nParaphrase(alma, letti)\nnot Craven(alma)\nHydrous(alma)\nSolo(alma, letti)\nnot Solo(alma, arvie)\nnot Pleading(letti)\nMomentous(letti)\nnot Solo(letti, alma)\nScuffle(arvie, alma)\nParaphrase(arvie, alma)\nSolo(arvie, alma)\nforall x (Scuffle(x, arvie) -> Fricative(arvie))\nforall x (Craven(x) and Solo(x, letti) -> Paraphrase(x, arvie))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, arvie) -> not Scuffle(x, letti))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, alma) and Fricative(x) -> Scuffle(x, arvie))\nnot Craven(letti) and not Solo(letti, alma) -> Solo(alma, letti)\nforall x (Solo(x, alma) and Paraphrase(alma, arvie) -> Hydrous(arvie))\n\nnot Scuffle(arvie, letti)\n\nScuffle(alma, arvie) and forall x (Scuffle(x, arvie) -> Fricative(arvie)) -> therefore Fricative(arvie) Scuffle(arvie, alma) and Fricative(arvie) and forall x (Scuffle(x, alma) and Fricative(x) -> Scuffle(x, arvie)) -> therefore Scuffle(arvie, arvie) Scuffle(arvie, arvie) and forall x (Scuffle(x, arvie) -> not Scuffle(x, letti)) -> therefore not Scuffle(arvie, letti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The kelsi bloody the shelly. The kelsi ding the rem. The kelsi is not flaunty. The kelsi is accessary. The kelsi repudiate the rem. The kelsi does not need the shelly. The rem is not laureled. The rem is overactive. The rem does not need the kelsi. The shelly bloody the kelsi. The shelly ding the kelsi. The shelly repudiate the kelsi. If someone bloody the shelly then the shelly is roomy. If someone is flaunty and they need the rem then they eat the shelly. If someone bloody the shelly then they do not chase the rem. If someone bloody the kelsi and they are roomy then they chase the shelly. If the rem is not flaunty and the rem does not need the kelsi then the kelsi repudiate the rem. If someone repudiate the kelsi and the kelsi ding the shelly then the shelly is accessary. The shelly bloody the rem.", "logic": "\nBloody(kelsi, shelly)\nDing(kelsi, rem)\nnot Flaunty(kelsi)\nAccessary(kelsi)\nRepudiate(kelsi, rem)\nnot Repudiate(kelsi, shelly)\nnot Laureled(rem)\nOveractive(rem)\nnot Repudiate(rem, kelsi)\nBloody(shelly, kelsi)\nDing(shelly, kelsi)\nRepudiate(shelly, kelsi)\nforall x (Bloody(x, shelly) -> Roomy(shelly))\nforall x (Flaunty(x) and Repudiate(x, rem) -> Ding(x, shelly))\nforall x (Bloody(x, shelly) -> not Bloody(x, rem))\nforall x (Bloody(x, kelsi) and Roomy(x) -> Bloody(x, shelly))\nnot Flaunty(rem) and not Repudiate(rem, kelsi) -> Repudiate(kelsi, rem)\nforall x (Repudiate(x, kelsi) and Ding(kelsi, shelly) -> Accessary(shelly))\n\nBloody(shelly, rem)\n\nBloody(kelsi, shelly) and forall x (Bloody(x, shelly) -> Roomy(shelly)) -> therefore Roomy(shelly) Bloody(shelly, kelsi) and Roomy(shelly) and forall x (Bloody(x, kelsi) and Roomy(x) -> Bloody(x, shelly)) -> therefore Bloody(shelly, shelly) Bloody(shelly, shelly) and forall x (Bloody(x, shelly) -> not Bloody(x, rem)) -> therefore not Bloody(shelly, rem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The silas alkalise the shamit. The silas nurse the nikki. The silas is not loverlike. The silas is attractive. The silas upchuck the nikki. The silas does not need the shamit. The nikki is not homophobic. The nikki is revokable. The nikki does not need the silas. The shamit alkalise the silas. The shamit nurse the silas. The shamit upchuck the silas. If someone alkalise the shamit then the shamit is hominine. If someone is loverlike and they need the nikki then they eat the shamit. If someone alkalise the shamit then they do not chase the nikki. If someone alkalise the silas and they are hominine then they chase the shamit. If the nikki is not loverlike and the nikki does not need the silas then the silas upchuck the nikki. If someone upchuck the silas and the silas nurse the shamit then the shamit is attractive. The nikki does not chase the shamit.", "logic": "\nAlkalise(silas, shamit)\nNurse(silas, nikki)\nnot Loverlike(silas)\nAttractive(silas)\nUpchuck(silas, nikki)\nnot Upchuck(silas, shamit)\nnot Homophobic(nikki)\nRevokable(nikki)\nnot Upchuck(nikki, silas)\nAlkalise(shamit, silas)\nNurse(shamit, silas)\nUpchuck(shamit, silas)\nforall x (Alkalise(x, shamit) -> Hominine(shamit))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and Upchuck(x, nikki) -> Nurse(x, shamit))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, shamit) -> not Alkalise(x, nikki))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, silas) and Hominine(x) -> Alkalise(x, shamit))\nnot Loverlike(nikki) and not Upchuck(nikki, silas) -> Upchuck(silas, nikki)\nforall x (Upchuck(x, silas) and Nurse(silas, shamit) -> Attractive(shamit))\n\nnot Alkalise(nikki, shamit)\n\nforall x (Alkalise(x, silas) and Hominine(x) -> Alkalise(x, shamit)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The reina reorder the morris. The reina miaow the fayette. The reina is not pitiful. The reina is roundish. The reina sandpaper the fayette. The reina does not need the morris. The fayette is not glad. The fayette is lubberly. The fayette does not need the reina. The morris reorder the reina. The morris miaow the reina. The morris sandpaper the reina. If someone reorder the morris then the morris is sinhalese. If someone is pitiful and they need the fayette then they eat the morris. If someone reorder the morris then they do not chase the fayette. If someone reorder the reina and they are sinhalese then they chase the morris. If the fayette is not pitiful and the fayette does not need the reina then the reina sandpaper the fayette. If someone sandpaper the reina and the reina miaow the morris then the morris is roundish. The morris is roundish.", "logic": "\nReorder(reina, morris)\nMiaow(reina, fayette)\nnot Pitiful(reina)\nRoundish(reina)\nSandpaper(reina, fayette)\nnot Sandpaper(reina, morris)\nnot Glad(fayette)\nLubberly(fayette)\nnot Sandpaper(fayette, reina)\nReorder(morris, reina)\nMiaow(morris, reina)\nSandpaper(morris, reina)\nforall x (Reorder(x, morris) -> Sinhalese(morris))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) and Sandpaper(x, fayette) -> Miaow(x, morris))\nforall x (Reorder(x, morris) -> not Reorder(x, fayette))\nforall x (Reorder(x, reina) and Sinhalese(x) -> Reorder(x, morris))\nnot Pitiful(fayette) and not Sandpaper(fayette, reina) -> Sandpaper(reina, fayette)\nforall x (Sandpaper(x, reina) and Miaow(reina, morris) -> Roundish(morris))\n\nRoundish(morris)\n\nforall x (Sandpaper(x, reina) and Miaow(reina, morris) -> Roundish(morris)) <- forall x (Pitiful(x) and Sandpaper(x, fayette) -> Miaow(x, morris)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The elana refer the dyanne. The elana diabolize the rickard. The elana is not negroid. The elana is autonomous. The elana parry the rickard. The elana does not need the dyanne. The rickard is not laudatory. The rickard is candescent. The rickard does not need the elana. The dyanne refer the elana. The dyanne diabolize the elana. The dyanne parry the elana. If someone refer the dyanne then the dyanne is unoiled. If someone is negroid and they need the rickard then they eat the dyanne. If someone refer the dyanne then they do not chase the rickard. If someone refer the elana and they are unoiled then they chase the dyanne. If the rickard is not negroid and the rickard does not need the elana then the elana parry the rickard. If someone parry the elana and the elana diabolize the dyanne then the dyanne is autonomous. The rickard does not eat the dyanne.", "logic": "\nRefer(elana, dyanne)\nDiabolize(elana, rickard)\nnot Negroid(elana)\nAutonomous(elana)\nParry(elana, rickard)\nnot Parry(elana, dyanne)\nnot Laudatory(rickard)\nCandescent(rickard)\nnot Parry(rickard, elana)\nRefer(dyanne, elana)\nDiabolize(dyanne, elana)\nParry(dyanne, elana)\nforall x (Refer(x, dyanne) -> Unoiled(dyanne))\nforall x (Negroid(x) and Parry(x, rickard) -> Diabolize(x, dyanne))\nforall x (Refer(x, dyanne) -> not Refer(x, rickard))\nforall x (Refer(x, elana) and Unoiled(x) -> Refer(x, dyanne))\nnot Negroid(rickard) and not Parry(rickard, elana) -> Parry(elana, rickard)\nforall x (Parry(x, elana) and Diabolize(elana, dyanne) -> Autonomous(dyanne))\n\nnot Diabolize(rickard, dyanne)\n\nforall x (Negroid(x) and Parry(x, rickard) -> Diabolize(x, dyanne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The wynne thrombose the rajeev. The wynne expel the marrilee. The wynne is not groovy. The wynne is rhetorical. The wynne will the marrilee. The wynne does not need the rajeev. The marrilee is not lachrymal. The marrilee is carboxyl. The marrilee does not need the wynne. The rajeev thrombose the wynne. The rajeev expel the wynne. The rajeev will the wynne. If someone thrombose the rajeev then the rajeev is humourous. If someone is groovy and they need the marrilee then they eat the rajeev. If someone thrombose the rajeev then they do not chase the marrilee. If someone thrombose the wynne and they are humourous then they chase the rajeev. If the marrilee is not groovy and the marrilee does not need the wynne then the wynne will the marrilee. If someone will the wynne and the wynne expel the rajeev then the rajeev is rhetorical. The wynne expel the rajeev.", "logic": "\nThrombose(wynne, rajeev)\nExpel(wynne, marrilee)\nnot Groovy(wynne)\nRhetorical(wynne)\nWill(wynne, marrilee)\nnot Will(wynne, rajeev)\nnot Lachrymal(marrilee)\nCarboxyl(marrilee)\nnot Will(marrilee, wynne)\nThrombose(rajeev, wynne)\nExpel(rajeev, wynne)\nWill(rajeev, wynne)\nforall x (Thrombose(x, rajeev) -> Humourous(rajeev))\nforall x (Groovy(x) and Will(x, marrilee) -> Expel(x, rajeev))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, rajeev) -> not Thrombose(x, marrilee))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, wynne) and Humourous(x) -> Thrombose(x, rajeev))\nnot Groovy(marrilee) and not Will(marrilee, wynne) -> Will(wynne, marrilee)\nforall x (Will(x, wynne) and Expel(wynne, rajeev) -> Rhetorical(rajeev))\n\nExpel(wynne, rajeev)\n\nforall x (Groovy(x) and Will(x, marrilee) -> Expel(x, rajeev)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The britney manicure the gaynor. The britney canonize the marinna. The britney is not thai. The britney is tasteless. The britney spritz the marinna. The britney does not need the gaynor. The marinna is not melodious. The marinna is pappose. The marinna does not need the britney. The gaynor manicure the britney. The gaynor canonize the britney. The gaynor spritz the britney. If someone manicure the gaynor then the gaynor is sotho. If someone is thai and they need the marinna then they eat the gaynor. If someone manicure the gaynor then they do not chase the marinna. If someone manicure the britney and they are sotho then they chase the gaynor. If the marinna is not thai and the marinna does not need the britney then the britney spritz the marinna. If someone spritz the britney and the britney canonize the gaynor then the gaynor is tasteless. The marinna is not thai.", "logic": "\nManicure(britney, gaynor)\nCanonize(britney, marinna)\nnot Thai(britney)\nTasteless(britney)\nSpritz(britney, marinna)\nnot Spritz(britney, gaynor)\nnot Melodious(marinna)\nPappose(marinna)\nnot Spritz(marinna, britney)\nManicure(gaynor, britney)\nCanonize(gaynor, britney)\nSpritz(gaynor, britney)\nforall x (Manicure(x, gaynor) -> Sotho(gaynor))\nforall x (Thai(x) and Spritz(x, marinna) -> Canonize(x, gaynor))\nforall x (Manicure(x, gaynor) -> not Manicure(x, marinna))\nforall x (Manicure(x, britney) and Sotho(x) -> Manicure(x, gaynor))\nnot Thai(marinna) and not Spritz(marinna, britney) -> Spritz(britney, marinna)\nforall x (Spritz(x, britney) and Canonize(britney, gaynor) -> Tasteless(gaynor))\n\nnot Thai(marinna)\n\nnot Thai(marinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The edouard quibble the murray. The edouard clarion the berna. The edouard is not quondam. The edouard is extramural. The edouard rubberneck the berna. The edouard does not need the murray. The berna is not ghanian. The berna is squiffy. The berna does not need the edouard. The murray quibble the edouard. The murray clarion the edouard. The murray rubberneck the edouard. If someone quibble the murray then the murray is lone. If someone is quondam and they need the berna then they eat the murray. If someone quibble the murray then they do not chase the berna. If someone quibble the edouard and they are lone then they chase the murray. If the berna is not quondam and the berna does not need the edouard then the edouard rubberneck the berna. If someone rubberneck the edouard and the edouard clarion the murray then the murray is extramural. The edouard rubberneck the edouard.", "logic": "\nQuibble(edouard, murray)\nClarion(edouard, berna)\nnot Quondam(edouard)\nExtramural(edouard)\nRubberneck(edouard, berna)\nnot Rubberneck(edouard, murray)\nnot Ghanian(berna)\nSquiffy(berna)\nnot Rubberneck(berna, edouard)\nQuibble(murray, edouard)\nClarion(murray, edouard)\nRubberneck(murray, edouard)\nforall x (Quibble(x, murray) -> Lone(murray))\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Rubberneck(x, berna) -> Clarion(x, murray))\nforall x (Quibble(x, murray) -> not Quibble(x, berna))\nforall x (Quibble(x, edouard) and Lone(x) -> Quibble(x, murray))\nnot Quondam(berna) and not Rubberneck(berna, edouard) -> Rubberneck(edouard, berna)\nforall x (Rubberneck(x, edouard) and Clarion(edouard, murray) -> Extramural(murray))\n\nRubberneck(edouard, edouard)\n\nRubberneck(edouard, edouard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The seamus orient the elijah. The seamus tamper the leif. The seamus is not throbbing. The seamus is relative. The seamus retick the leif. The seamus does not need the elijah. The leif is not sleeping. The leif is shrill. The leif does not need the seamus. The elijah orient the seamus. The elijah tamper the seamus. The elijah retick the seamus. If someone orient the elijah then the elijah is consonant. If someone is throbbing and they need the leif then they eat the elijah. If someone orient the elijah then they do not chase the leif. If someone orient the seamus and they are consonant then they chase the elijah. If the leif is not throbbing and the leif does not need the seamus then the seamus retick the leif. If someone retick the seamus and the seamus tamper the elijah then the elijah is relative. The leif does not eat the seamus.", "logic": "\nOrient(seamus, elijah)\nTamper(seamus, leif)\nnot Throbbing(seamus)\nRelative(seamus)\nRetick(seamus, leif)\nnot Retick(seamus, elijah)\nnot Sleeping(leif)\nShrill(leif)\nnot Retick(leif, seamus)\nOrient(elijah, seamus)\nTamper(elijah, seamus)\nRetick(elijah, seamus)\nforall x (Orient(x, elijah) -> Consonant(elijah))\nforall x (Throbbing(x) and Retick(x, leif) -> Tamper(x, elijah))\nforall x (Orient(x, elijah) -> not Orient(x, leif))\nforall x (Orient(x, seamus) and Consonant(x) -> Orient(x, elijah))\nnot Throbbing(leif) and not Retick(leif, seamus) -> Retick(seamus, leif)\nforall x (Retick(x, seamus) and Tamper(seamus, elijah) -> Relative(elijah))\n\nnot Tamper(leif, seamus)\n\nnot Tamper(leif, seamus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The aeriel saltate the claude. The aeriel span the zorina. The aeriel is not corrected. The aeriel is cruel. The aeriel clam the zorina. The aeriel does not need the claude. The zorina is not satellite. The zorina is bronze. The zorina does not need the aeriel. The claude saltate the aeriel. The claude span the aeriel. The claude clam the aeriel. If someone saltate the claude then the claude is captious. If someone is corrected and they need the zorina then they eat the claude. If someone saltate the claude then they do not chase the zorina. If someone saltate the aeriel and they are captious then they chase the claude. If the zorina is not corrected and the zorina does not need the aeriel then the aeriel clam the zorina. If someone clam the aeriel and the aeriel span the claude then the claude is cruel. The zorina span the zorina.", "logic": "\nSaltate(aeriel, claude)\nSpan(aeriel, zorina)\nnot Corrected(aeriel)\nCruel(aeriel)\nClam(aeriel, zorina)\nnot Clam(aeriel, claude)\nnot Satellite(zorina)\nBronze(zorina)\nnot Clam(zorina, aeriel)\nSaltate(claude, aeriel)\nSpan(claude, aeriel)\nClam(claude, aeriel)\nforall x (Saltate(x, claude) -> Captious(claude))\nforall x (Corrected(x) and Clam(x, zorina) -> Span(x, claude))\nforall x (Saltate(x, claude) -> not Saltate(x, zorina))\nforall x (Saltate(x, aeriel) and Captious(x) -> Saltate(x, claude))\nnot Corrected(zorina) and not Clam(zorina, aeriel) -> Clam(aeriel, zorina)\nforall x (Clam(x, aeriel) and Span(aeriel, claude) -> Cruel(claude))\n\nSpan(zorina, zorina)\n\nSpan(zorina, zorina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The jeanelle trawl the barbie. The stevie is not lxvii. The stevie is encumbered. The stevie is not falciform. The stevie enclose the allie. The stevie enclose the barbie. The allie trawl the jeanelle. The allie trawl the stevie. The allie is thwarted. The allie kill the barbie. The barbie trawl the stevie. The barbie trawl the allie. The barbie is thwarted. The barbie is hatless. The barbie is encumbered. The barbie kill the stevie. If something enclose the barbie then it kill the stevie. If something is falciform then it kill the stevie. If something is falciform and it trawl the barbie then the barbie kill the allie. If something enclose the allie then it enclose the barbie. If something is encumbered and it trawl the allie then it trawl the barbie. If something trawl the barbie and it is encumbered then the barbie is falciform. If something kill the allie and the allie kill the barbie then the allie trawl the jeanelle. If something trawl the stevie and the stevie does not see the barbie then the barbie is lxvii. The jeanelle trawl the barbie.", "logic": "\nTrawl(jeanelle, barbie)\nnot Lxvii(stevie)\nEncumbered(stevie)\nnot Falciform(stevie)\nEnclose(stevie, allie)\nEnclose(stevie, barbie)\nTrawl(allie, jeanelle)\nTrawl(allie, stevie)\nThwarted(allie)\nKill(allie, barbie)\nTrawl(barbie, stevie)\nTrawl(barbie, allie)\nThwarted(barbie)\nHatless(barbie)\nEncumbered(barbie)\nKill(barbie, stevie)\nforall x (Enclose(x, barbie) -> Kill(x, stevie))\nforall x (Falciform(x) -> Kill(x, stevie))\nforall x (Falciform(x) and Trawl(x, barbie) -> Kill(barbie, allie))\nforall x (Enclose(x, allie) -> Enclose(x, barbie))\nforall x (Encumbered(x) and Trawl(x, allie) -> Trawl(x, barbie))\nforall x (Trawl(x, barbie) and Encumbered(x) -> Falciform(barbie))\nforall x (Kill(x, allie) and Kill(allie, barbie) -> Trawl(allie, jeanelle))\nforall x (Trawl(x, stevie) and not Kill(stevie, barbie) -> Lxvii(barbie))\n\nTrawl(jeanelle, barbie)\n\ntherefore Trawl(jeanelle, barbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The flossi socialize the marinna. The lavina is not diocesan. The lavina is venal. The lavina is not cyclonical. The lavina castle the honor. The lavina castle the marinna. The honor socialize the flossi. The honor socialize the lavina. The honor is unbodied. The honor wheeze the marinna. The marinna socialize the lavina. The marinna socialize the honor. The marinna is unbodied. The marinna is caddish. The marinna is venal. The marinna wheeze the lavina. If something castle the marinna then it wheeze the lavina. If something is cyclonical then it wheeze the lavina. If something is cyclonical and it socialize the marinna then the marinna wheeze the honor. If something castle the honor then it castle the marinna. If something is venal and it socialize the honor then it socialize the marinna. If something socialize the marinna and it is venal then the marinna is cyclonical. If something wheeze the honor and the honor wheeze the marinna then the honor socialize the flossi. If something socialize the lavina and the lavina does not see the marinna then the marinna is diocesan. The lavina is not venal.", "logic": "\nSocialize(flossi, marinna)\nnot Diocesan(lavina)\nVenal(lavina)\nnot Cyclonical(lavina)\nCastle(lavina, honor)\nCastle(lavina, marinna)\nSocialize(honor, flossi)\nSocialize(honor, lavina)\nUnbodied(honor)\nWheeze(honor, marinna)\nSocialize(marinna, lavina)\nSocialize(marinna, honor)\nUnbodied(marinna)\nCaddish(marinna)\nVenal(marinna)\nWheeze(marinna, lavina)\nforall x (Castle(x, marinna) -> Wheeze(x, lavina))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) -> Wheeze(x, lavina))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) and Socialize(x, marinna) -> Wheeze(marinna, honor))\nforall x (Castle(x, honor) -> Castle(x, marinna))\nforall x (Venal(x) and Socialize(x, honor) -> Socialize(x, marinna))\nforall x (Socialize(x, marinna) and Venal(x) -> Cyclonical(marinna))\nforall x (Wheeze(x, honor) and Wheeze(honor, marinna) -> Socialize(honor, flossi))\nforall x (Socialize(x, lavina) and not Wheeze(lavina, marinna) -> Diocesan(marinna))\n\nnot Venal(lavina)\n\ntherefore Venal(lavina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The evelyn recapture the casey. The gamaliel is not amended. The gamaliel is beatific. The gamaliel is not mortgaged. The gamaliel protest the donnajean. The gamaliel protest the casey. The donnajean recapture the evelyn. The donnajean recapture the gamaliel. The donnajean is xcvi. The donnajean arise the casey. The casey recapture the gamaliel. The casey recapture the donnajean. The casey is xcvi. The casey is shielded. The casey is beatific. The casey arise the gamaliel. If something protest the casey then it arise the gamaliel. If something is mortgaged then it arise the gamaliel. If something is mortgaged and it recapture the casey then the casey arise the donnajean. If something protest the donnajean then it protest the casey. If something is beatific and it recapture the donnajean then it recapture the casey. If something recapture the casey and it is beatific then the casey is mortgaged. If something arise the donnajean and the donnajean arise the casey then the donnajean recapture the evelyn. If something recapture the gamaliel and the gamaliel does not see the casey then the casey is amended. The casey recapture the casey.", "logic": "\nRecapture(evelyn, casey)\nnot Amended(gamaliel)\nBeatific(gamaliel)\nnot Mortgaged(gamaliel)\nProtest(gamaliel, donnajean)\nProtest(gamaliel, casey)\nRecapture(donnajean, evelyn)\nRecapture(donnajean, gamaliel)\nXcvi(donnajean)\nArise(donnajean, casey)\nRecapture(casey, gamaliel)\nRecapture(casey, donnajean)\nXcvi(casey)\nShielded(casey)\nBeatific(casey)\nArise(casey, gamaliel)\nforall x (Protest(x, casey) -> Arise(x, gamaliel))\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Arise(x, gamaliel))\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) and Recapture(x, casey) -> Arise(casey, donnajean))\nforall x (Protest(x, donnajean) -> Protest(x, casey))\nforall x (Beatific(x) and Recapture(x, donnajean) -> Recapture(x, casey))\nforall x (Recapture(x, casey) and Beatific(x) -> Mortgaged(casey))\nforall x (Arise(x, donnajean) and Arise(donnajean, casey) -> Recapture(donnajean, evelyn))\nforall x (Recapture(x, gamaliel) and not Arise(gamaliel, casey) -> Amended(casey))\n\nRecapture(casey, casey)\n\nBeatific(casey) and Recapture(casey, donnajean) and forall x (Beatific(x) and Recapture(x, donnajean) -> Recapture(x, casey)) -> therefore Recapture(casey, casey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The valene jump the seline. The nicoli is not algerian. The nicoli is invaluable. The nicoli is not avaricious. The nicoli fagot the dorthy. The nicoli fagot the seline. The dorthy jump the valene. The dorthy jump the nicoli. The dorthy is tingling. The dorthy fire the seline. The seline jump the nicoli. The seline jump the dorthy. The seline is tingling. The seline is sewn. The seline is invaluable. The seline fire the nicoli. If something fagot the seline then it fire the nicoli. If something is avaricious then it fire the nicoli. If something is avaricious and it jump the seline then the seline fire the dorthy. If something fagot the dorthy then it fagot the seline. If something is invaluable and it jump the dorthy then it jump the seline. If something jump the seline and it is invaluable then the seline is avaricious. If something fire the dorthy and the dorthy fire the seline then the dorthy jump the valene. If something jump the nicoli and the nicoli does not see the seline then the seline is algerian. The nicoli does not see the nicoli.", "logic": "\nJump(valene, seline)\nnot Algerian(nicoli)\nInvaluable(nicoli)\nnot Avaricious(nicoli)\nFagot(nicoli, dorthy)\nFagot(nicoli, seline)\nJump(dorthy, valene)\nJump(dorthy, nicoli)\nTingling(dorthy)\nFire(dorthy, seline)\nJump(seline, nicoli)\nJump(seline, dorthy)\nTingling(seline)\nSewn(seline)\nInvaluable(seline)\nFire(seline, nicoli)\nforall x (Fagot(x, seline) -> Fire(x, nicoli))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Fire(x, nicoli))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) and Jump(x, seline) -> Fire(seline, dorthy))\nforall x (Fagot(x, dorthy) -> Fagot(x, seline))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) and Jump(x, dorthy) -> Jump(x, seline))\nforall x (Jump(x, seline) and Invaluable(x) -> Avaricious(seline))\nforall x (Fire(x, dorthy) and Fire(dorthy, seline) -> Jump(dorthy, valene))\nforall x (Jump(x, nicoli) and not Fire(nicoli, seline) -> Algerian(seline))\n\nnot Fire(nicoli, nicoli)\n\nFagot(nicoli, seline) and forall x (Fagot(x, seline) -> Fire(x, nicoli)) -> therefore Fire(nicoli, nicoli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The nada repeat the duffy. The danna is not cycloidal. The danna is chestnut. The danna is not suctorial. The danna perpetuate the helga. The danna perpetuate the duffy. The helga repeat the nada. The helga repeat the danna. The helga is astonished. The helga summer the duffy. The duffy repeat the danna. The duffy repeat the helga. The duffy is astonished. The duffy is forty. The duffy is chestnut. The duffy summer the danna. If something perpetuate the duffy then it summer the danna. If something is suctorial then it summer the danna. If something is suctorial and it repeat the duffy then the duffy summer the helga. If something perpetuate the helga then it perpetuate the duffy. If something is chestnut and it repeat the helga then it repeat the duffy. If something repeat the duffy and it is chestnut then the duffy is suctorial. If something summer the helga and the helga summer the duffy then the helga repeat the nada. If something repeat the danna and the danna does not see the duffy then the duffy is cycloidal. The duffy is suctorial.", "logic": "\nRepeat(nada, duffy)\nnot Cycloidal(danna)\nChestnut(danna)\nnot Suctorial(danna)\nPerpetuate(danna, helga)\nPerpetuate(danna, duffy)\nRepeat(helga, nada)\nRepeat(helga, danna)\nAstonished(helga)\nSummer(helga, duffy)\nRepeat(duffy, danna)\nRepeat(duffy, helga)\nAstonished(duffy)\nForty(duffy)\nChestnut(duffy)\nSummer(duffy, danna)\nforall x (Perpetuate(x, duffy) -> Summer(x, danna))\nforall x (Suctorial(x) -> Summer(x, danna))\nforall x (Suctorial(x) and Repeat(x, duffy) -> Summer(duffy, helga))\nforall x (Perpetuate(x, helga) -> Perpetuate(x, duffy))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) and Repeat(x, helga) -> Repeat(x, duffy))\nforall x (Repeat(x, duffy) and Chestnut(x) -> Suctorial(duffy))\nforall x (Summer(x, helga) and Summer(helga, duffy) -> Repeat(helga, nada))\nforall x (Repeat(x, danna) and not Summer(danna, duffy) -> Cycloidal(duffy))\n\nSuctorial(duffy)\n\nChestnut(duffy) and Repeat(duffy, helga) and forall x (Chestnut(x) and Repeat(x, helga) -> Repeat(x, duffy)) -> therefore Repeat(duffy, duffy) Repeat(duffy, duffy) and Chestnut(duffy) and forall x (Repeat(x, duffy) and Chestnut(x) -> Suctorial(duffy)) -> therefore Suctorial(duffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The dwaine trundle the stan. The harman is not percussive. The harman is saporous. The harman is not aurorean. The harman netmail the ari. The harman netmail the stan. The ari trundle the dwaine. The ari trundle the harman. The ari is calyptrate. The ari rusticate the stan. The stan trundle the harman. The stan trundle the ari. The stan is calyptrate. The stan is inutile. The stan is saporous. The stan rusticate the harman. If something netmail the stan then it rusticate the harman. If something is aurorean then it rusticate the harman. If something is aurorean and it trundle the stan then the stan rusticate the ari. If something netmail the ari then it netmail the stan. If something is saporous and it trundle the ari then it trundle the stan. If something trundle the stan and it is saporous then the stan is aurorean. If something rusticate the ari and the ari rusticate the stan then the ari trundle the dwaine. If something trundle the harman and the harman does not see the stan then the stan is percussive. The stan is not aurorean.", "logic": "\nTrundle(dwaine, stan)\nnot Percussive(harman)\nSaporous(harman)\nnot Aurorean(harman)\nNetmail(harman, ari)\nNetmail(harman, stan)\nTrundle(ari, dwaine)\nTrundle(ari, harman)\nCalyptrate(ari)\nRusticate(ari, stan)\nTrundle(stan, harman)\nTrundle(stan, ari)\nCalyptrate(stan)\nInutile(stan)\nSaporous(stan)\nRusticate(stan, harman)\nforall x (Netmail(x, stan) -> Rusticate(x, harman))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) -> Rusticate(x, harman))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) and Trundle(x, stan) -> Rusticate(stan, ari))\nforall x (Netmail(x, ari) -> Netmail(x, stan))\nforall x (Saporous(x) and Trundle(x, ari) -> Trundle(x, stan))\nforall x (Trundle(x, stan) and Saporous(x) -> Aurorean(stan))\nforall x (Rusticate(x, ari) and Rusticate(ari, stan) -> Trundle(ari, dwaine))\nforall x (Trundle(x, harman) and not Rusticate(harman, stan) -> Percussive(stan))\n\nnot Aurorean(stan)\n\nSaporous(stan) and Trundle(stan, ari) and forall x (Saporous(x) and Trundle(x, ari) -> Trundle(x, stan)) -> therefore Trundle(stan, stan) Trundle(stan, stan) and Saporous(stan) and forall x (Trundle(x, stan) and Saporous(x) -> Aurorean(stan)) -> therefore Aurorean(stan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The alysa quadruple the sheena. The zary is not waking. The zary is ribald. The zary is not loathly. The zary seize the genevieve. The zary seize the sheena. The genevieve quadruple the alysa. The genevieve quadruple the zary. The genevieve is waxing. The genevieve simonize the sheena. The sheena quadruple the zary. The sheena quadruple the genevieve. The sheena is waxing. The sheena is genetic. The sheena is ribald. The sheena simonize the zary. If something seize the sheena then it simonize the zary. If something is loathly then it simonize the zary. If something is loathly and it quadruple the sheena then the sheena simonize the genevieve. If something seize the genevieve then it seize the sheena. If something is ribald and it quadruple the genevieve then it quadruple the sheena. If something quadruple the sheena and it is ribald then the sheena is loathly. If something simonize the genevieve and the genevieve simonize the sheena then the genevieve quadruple the alysa. If something quadruple the zary and the zary does not see the sheena then the sheena is waking. The sheena simonize the genevieve.", "logic": "\nQuadruple(alysa, sheena)\nnot Waking(zary)\nRibald(zary)\nnot Loathly(zary)\nSeize(zary, genevieve)\nSeize(zary, sheena)\nQuadruple(genevieve, alysa)\nQuadruple(genevieve, zary)\nWaxing(genevieve)\nSimonize(genevieve, sheena)\nQuadruple(sheena, zary)\nQuadruple(sheena, genevieve)\nWaxing(sheena)\nGenetic(sheena)\nRibald(sheena)\nSimonize(sheena, zary)\nforall x (Seize(x, sheena) -> Simonize(x, zary))\nforall x (Loathly(x) -> Simonize(x, zary))\nforall x (Loathly(x) and Quadruple(x, sheena) -> Simonize(sheena, genevieve))\nforall x (Seize(x, genevieve) -> Seize(x, sheena))\nforall x (Ribald(x) and Quadruple(x, genevieve) -> Quadruple(x, sheena))\nforall x (Quadruple(x, sheena) and Ribald(x) -> Loathly(sheena))\nforall x (Simonize(x, genevieve) and Simonize(genevieve, sheena) -> Quadruple(genevieve, alysa))\nforall x (Quadruple(x, zary) and not Simonize(zary, sheena) -> Waking(sheena))\n\nSimonize(sheena, genevieve)\n\nRibald(sheena) and Quadruple(sheena, genevieve) and forall x (Ribald(x) and Quadruple(x, genevieve) -> Quadruple(x, sheena)) -> therefore Quadruple(sheena, sheena) Quadruple(sheena, sheena) and Ribald(sheena) and forall x (Quadruple(x, sheena) and Ribald(x) -> Loathly(sheena)) -> therefore Loathly(sheena) Ribald(sheena) and Quadruple(sheena, genevieve) and forall x (Ribald(x) and Quadruple(x, genevieve) -> Quadruple(x, sheena)) -> therefore Quadruple(sheena, sheena) Loathly(sheena) and Quadruple(sheena, sheena) and forall x (Loathly(x) and Quadruple(x, sheena) -> Simonize(sheena, genevieve)) -> therefore Simonize(sheena, genevieve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The fleur queer the kaylil. The annabela is not assumptive. The annabela is boneheaded. The annabela is not chitinous. The annabela summate the donia. The annabela summate the kaylil. The donia queer the fleur. The donia queer the annabela. The donia is reposeful. The donia scrabble the kaylil. The kaylil queer the annabela. The kaylil queer the donia. The kaylil is reposeful. The kaylil is maltese. The kaylil is boneheaded. The kaylil scrabble the annabela. If something summate the kaylil then it scrabble the annabela. If something is chitinous then it scrabble the annabela. If something is chitinous and it queer the kaylil then the kaylil scrabble the donia. If something summate the donia then it summate the kaylil. If something is boneheaded and it queer the donia then it queer the kaylil. If something queer the kaylil and it is boneheaded then the kaylil is chitinous. If something scrabble the donia and the donia scrabble the kaylil then the donia queer the fleur. If something queer the annabela and the annabela does not see the kaylil then the kaylil is assumptive. The kaylil does not see the donia.", "logic": "\nQueer(fleur, kaylil)\nnot Assumptive(annabela)\nBoneheaded(annabela)\nnot Chitinous(annabela)\nSummate(annabela, donia)\nSummate(annabela, kaylil)\nQueer(donia, fleur)\nQueer(donia, annabela)\nReposeful(donia)\nScrabble(donia, kaylil)\nQueer(kaylil, annabela)\nQueer(kaylil, donia)\nReposeful(kaylil)\nMaltese(kaylil)\nBoneheaded(kaylil)\nScrabble(kaylil, annabela)\nforall x (Summate(x, kaylil) -> Scrabble(x, annabela))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> Scrabble(x, annabela))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) and Queer(x, kaylil) -> Scrabble(kaylil, donia))\nforall x (Summate(x, donia) -> Summate(x, kaylil))\nforall x (Boneheaded(x) and Queer(x, donia) -> Queer(x, kaylil))\nforall x (Queer(x, kaylil) and Boneheaded(x) -> Chitinous(kaylil))\nforall x (Scrabble(x, donia) and Scrabble(donia, kaylil) -> Queer(donia, fleur))\nforall x (Queer(x, annabela) and not Scrabble(annabela, kaylil) -> Assumptive(kaylil))\n\nnot Scrabble(kaylil, donia)\n\nBoneheaded(kaylil) and Queer(kaylil, donia) and forall x (Boneheaded(x) and Queer(x, donia) -> Queer(x, kaylil)) -> therefore Queer(kaylil, kaylil) Queer(kaylil, kaylil) and Boneheaded(kaylil) and forall x (Queer(x, kaylil) and Boneheaded(x) -> Chitinous(kaylil)) -> therefore Chitinous(kaylil) Boneheaded(kaylil) and Queer(kaylil, donia) and forall x (Boneheaded(x) and Queer(x, donia) -> Queer(x, kaylil)) -> therefore Queer(kaylil, kaylil) Chitinous(kaylil) and Queer(kaylil, kaylil) and forall x (Chitinous(x) and Queer(x, kaylil) -> Scrabble(kaylil, donia)) -> therefore Scrabble(kaylil, donia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The bridgette frizzle the maddie. The queada is not chic. The queada is heedless. The queada is not ratable. The queada profess the webster. The queada profess the maddie. The webster frizzle the bridgette. The webster frizzle the queada. The webster is slighting. The webster esterify the maddie. The maddie frizzle the queada. The maddie frizzle the webster. The maddie is slighting. The maddie is ellipsoid. The maddie is heedless. The maddie esterify the queada. If something profess the maddie then it esterify the queada. If something is ratable then it esterify the queada. If something is ratable and it frizzle the maddie then the maddie esterify the webster. If something profess the webster then it profess the maddie. If something is heedless and it frizzle the webster then it frizzle the maddie. If something frizzle the maddie and it is heedless then the maddie is ratable. If something esterify the webster and the webster esterify the maddie then the webster frizzle the bridgette. If something frizzle the queada and the queada does not see the maddie then the maddie is chic. The maddie does not need the maddie.", "logic": "\nFrizzle(bridgette, maddie)\nnot Chic(queada)\nHeedless(queada)\nnot Ratable(queada)\nProfess(queada, webster)\nProfess(queada, maddie)\nFrizzle(webster, bridgette)\nFrizzle(webster, queada)\nSlighting(webster)\nEsterify(webster, maddie)\nFrizzle(maddie, queada)\nFrizzle(maddie, webster)\nSlighting(maddie)\nEllipsoid(maddie)\nHeedless(maddie)\nEsterify(maddie, queada)\nforall x (Profess(x, maddie) -> Esterify(x, queada))\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> Esterify(x, queada))\nforall x (Ratable(x) and Frizzle(x, maddie) -> Esterify(maddie, webster))\nforall x (Profess(x, webster) -> Profess(x, maddie))\nforall x (Heedless(x) and Frizzle(x, webster) -> Frizzle(x, maddie))\nforall x (Frizzle(x, maddie) and Heedless(x) -> Ratable(maddie))\nforall x (Esterify(x, webster) and Esterify(webster, maddie) -> Frizzle(webster, bridgette))\nforall x (Frizzle(x, queada) and not Esterify(queada, maddie) -> Chic(maddie))\n\nnot Profess(maddie, maddie)\n\nforall x (Profess(x, webster) -> Profess(x, maddie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The case coapt the moria. The nesta is not blotched. The nesta is pawky. The nesta is not carbonyl. The nesta mortise the rakel. The nesta mortise the moria. The rakel coapt the case. The rakel coapt the nesta. The rakel is arid. The rakel occasion the moria. The moria coapt the nesta. The moria coapt the rakel. The moria is arid. The moria is possessive. The moria is pawky. The moria occasion the nesta. If something mortise the moria then it occasion the nesta. If something is carbonyl then it occasion the nesta. If something is carbonyl and it coapt the moria then the moria occasion the rakel. If something mortise the rakel then it mortise the moria. If something is pawky and it coapt the rakel then it coapt the moria. If something coapt the moria and it is pawky then the moria is carbonyl. If something occasion the rakel and the rakel occasion the moria then the rakel coapt the case. If something coapt the nesta and the nesta does not see the moria then the moria is blotched. The case mortise the moria.", "logic": "\nCoapt(case, moria)\nnot Blotched(nesta)\nPawky(nesta)\nnot Carbonyl(nesta)\nMortise(nesta, rakel)\nMortise(nesta, moria)\nCoapt(rakel, case)\nCoapt(rakel, nesta)\nArid(rakel)\nOccasion(rakel, moria)\nCoapt(moria, nesta)\nCoapt(moria, rakel)\nArid(moria)\nPossessive(moria)\nPawky(moria)\nOccasion(moria, nesta)\nforall x (Mortise(x, moria) -> Occasion(x, nesta))\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) -> Occasion(x, nesta))\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) and Coapt(x, moria) -> Occasion(moria, rakel))\nforall x (Mortise(x, rakel) -> Mortise(x, moria))\nforall x (Pawky(x) and Coapt(x, rakel) -> Coapt(x, moria))\nforall x (Coapt(x, moria) and Pawky(x) -> Carbonyl(moria))\nforall x (Occasion(x, rakel) and Occasion(rakel, moria) -> Coapt(rakel, case))\nforall x (Coapt(x, nesta) and not Occasion(nesta, moria) -> Blotched(moria))\n\nMortise(case, moria)\n\nforall x (Mortise(x, rakel) -> Mortise(x, moria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The luce bulk the tammie. The sibylle is not past. The sibylle is potbellied. The sibylle is not armenian. The sibylle narrow the stanleigh. The sibylle narrow the tammie. The stanleigh bulk the luce. The stanleigh bulk the sibylle. The stanleigh is alight. The stanleigh avoid the tammie. The tammie bulk the sibylle. The tammie bulk the stanleigh. The tammie is alight. The tammie is tongueless. The tammie is potbellied. The tammie avoid the sibylle. If something narrow the tammie then it avoid the sibylle. If something is armenian then it avoid the sibylle. If something is armenian and it bulk the tammie then the tammie avoid the stanleigh. If something narrow the stanleigh then it narrow the tammie. If something is potbellied and it bulk the stanleigh then it bulk the tammie. If something bulk the tammie and it is potbellied then the tammie is armenian. If something avoid the stanleigh and the stanleigh avoid the tammie then the stanleigh bulk the luce. If something bulk the sibylle and the sibylle does not see the tammie then the tammie is past. The sibylle does not chase the tammie.", "logic": "\nBulk(luce, tammie)\nnot Past(sibylle)\nPotbellied(sibylle)\nnot Armenian(sibylle)\nNarrow(sibylle, stanleigh)\nNarrow(sibylle, tammie)\nBulk(stanleigh, luce)\nBulk(stanleigh, sibylle)\nAlight(stanleigh)\nAvoid(stanleigh, tammie)\nBulk(tammie, sibylle)\nBulk(tammie, stanleigh)\nAlight(tammie)\nTongueless(tammie)\nPotbellied(tammie)\nAvoid(tammie, sibylle)\nforall x (Narrow(x, tammie) -> Avoid(x, sibylle))\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> Avoid(x, sibylle))\nforall x (Armenian(x) and Bulk(x, tammie) -> Avoid(tammie, stanleigh))\nforall x (Narrow(x, stanleigh) -> Narrow(x, tammie))\nforall x (Potbellied(x) and Bulk(x, stanleigh) -> Bulk(x, tammie))\nforall x (Bulk(x, tammie) and Potbellied(x) -> Armenian(tammie))\nforall x (Avoid(x, stanleigh) and Avoid(stanleigh, tammie) -> Bulk(stanleigh, luce))\nforall x (Bulk(x, sibylle) and not Avoid(sibylle, tammie) -> Past(tammie))\n\nnot Bulk(sibylle, tammie)\n\nforall x (Potbellied(x) and Bulk(x, stanleigh) -> Bulk(x, tammie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The meredithe tampon the emily. The alvinia is not bivalve. The alvinia is main. The alvinia is not expected. The alvinia designate the marie. The alvinia designate the emily. The marie tampon the meredithe. The marie tampon the alvinia. The marie is hunted. The marie behoove the emily. The emily tampon the alvinia. The emily tampon the marie. The emily is hunted. The emily is dilatory. The emily is main. The emily behoove the alvinia. If something designate the emily then it behoove the alvinia. If something is expected then it behoove the alvinia. If something is expected and it tampon the emily then the emily behoove the marie. If something designate the marie then it designate the emily. If something is main and it tampon the marie then it tampon the emily. If something tampon the emily and it is main then the emily is expected. If something behoove the marie and the marie behoove the emily then the marie tampon the meredithe. If something tampon the alvinia and the alvinia does not see the emily then the emily is bivalve. The marie behoove the alvinia.", "logic": "\nTampon(meredithe, emily)\nnot Bivalve(alvinia)\nMain(alvinia)\nnot Expected(alvinia)\nDesignate(alvinia, marie)\nDesignate(alvinia, emily)\nTampon(marie, meredithe)\nTampon(marie, alvinia)\nHunted(marie)\nBehoove(marie, emily)\nTampon(emily, alvinia)\nTampon(emily, marie)\nHunted(emily)\nDilatory(emily)\nMain(emily)\nBehoove(emily, alvinia)\nforall x (Designate(x, emily) -> Behoove(x, alvinia))\nforall x (Expected(x) -> Behoove(x, alvinia))\nforall x (Expected(x) and Tampon(x, emily) -> Behoove(emily, marie))\nforall x (Designate(x, marie) -> Designate(x, emily))\nforall x (Main(x) and Tampon(x, marie) -> Tampon(x, emily))\nforall x (Tampon(x, emily) and Main(x) -> Expected(emily))\nforall x (Behoove(x, marie) and Behoove(marie, emily) -> Tampon(marie, meredithe))\nforall x (Tampon(x, alvinia) and not Behoove(alvinia, emily) -> Bivalve(emily))\n\nBehoove(marie, alvinia)\n\nforall x (Designate(x, emily) -> Behoove(x, alvinia)) <- forall x (Designate(x, marie) -> Designate(x, emily)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The marchelle trample the della. The laurella is not storied. The laurella is piscatory. The laurella is not onymous. The laurella smut the waverly. The laurella smut the della. The waverly trample the marchelle. The waverly trample the laurella. The waverly is chaffy. The waverly spoonfeed the della. The della trample the laurella. The della trample the waverly. The della is chaffy. The della is eyelike. The della is piscatory. The della spoonfeed the laurella. If something smut the della then it spoonfeed the laurella. If something is onymous then it spoonfeed the laurella. If something is onymous and it trample the della then the della spoonfeed the waverly. If something smut the waverly then it smut the della. If something is piscatory and it trample the waverly then it trample the della. If something trample the della and it is piscatory then the della is onymous. If something spoonfeed the waverly and the waverly spoonfeed the della then the waverly trample the marchelle. If something trample the laurella and the laurella does not see the della then the della is storied. The marchelle does not need the marchelle.", "logic": "\nTrample(marchelle, della)\nnot Storied(laurella)\nPiscatory(laurella)\nnot Onymous(laurella)\nSmut(laurella, waverly)\nSmut(laurella, della)\nTrample(waverly, marchelle)\nTrample(waverly, laurella)\nChaffy(waverly)\nSpoonfeed(waverly, della)\nTrample(della, laurella)\nTrample(della, waverly)\nChaffy(della)\nEyelike(della)\nPiscatory(della)\nSpoonfeed(della, laurella)\nforall x (Smut(x, della) -> Spoonfeed(x, laurella))\nforall x (Onymous(x) -> Spoonfeed(x, laurella))\nforall x (Onymous(x) and Trample(x, della) -> Spoonfeed(della, waverly))\nforall x (Smut(x, waverly) -> Smut(x, della))\nforall x (Piscatory(x) and Trample(x, waverly) -> Trample(x, della))\nforall x (Trample(x, della) and Piscatory(x) -> Onymous(della))\nforall x (Spoonfeed(x, waverly) and Spoonfeed(waverly, della) -> Trample(waverly, marchelle))\nforall x (Trample(x, laurella) and not Spoonfeed(laurella, della) -> Storied(della))\n\nnot Smut(marchelle, marchelle)\n\nnot Smut(marchelle, marchelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The wat dissever the gene. The ladonna is not slangy. The ladonna is homostyled. The ladonna is not fatty. The ladonna hope the shawn. The ladonna hope the gene. The shawn dissever the wat. The shawn dissever the ladonna. The shawn is diatonic. The shawn didder the gene. The gene dissever the ladonna. The gene dissever the shawn. The gene is diatonic. The gene is mancunian. The gene is homostyled. The gene didder the ladonna. If something hope the gene then it didder the ladonna. If something is fatty then it didder the ladonna. If something is fatty and it dissever the gene then the gene didder the shawn. If something hope the shawn then it hope the gene. If something is homostyled and it dissever the shawn then it dissever the gene. If something dissever the gene and it is homostyled then the gene is fatty. If something didder the shawn and the shawn didder the gene then the shawn dissever the wat. If something dissever the ladonna and the ladonna does not see the gene then the gene is slangy. The gene hope the wat.", "logic": "\nDissever(wat, gene)\nnot Slangy(ladonna)\nHomostyled(ladonna)\nnot Fatty(ladonna)\nHope(ladonna, shawn)\nHope(ladonna, gene)\nDissever(shawn, wat)\nDissever(shawn, ladonna)\nDiatonic(shawn)\nDidder(shawn, gene)\nDissever(gene, ladonna)\nDissever(gene, shawn)\nDiatonic(gene)\nMancunian(gene)\nHomostyled(gene)\nDidder(gene, ladonna)\nforall x (Hope(x, gene) -> Didder(x, ladonna))\nforall x (Fatty(x) -> Didder(x, ladonna))\nforall x (Fatty(x) and Dissever(x, gene) -> Didder(gene, shawn))\nforall x (Hope(x, shawn) -> Hope(x, gene))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Dissever(x, shawn) -> Dissever(x, gene))\nforall x (Dissever(x, gene) and Homostyled(x) -> Fatty(gene))\nforall x (Didder(x, shawn) and Didder(shawn, gene) -> Dissever(shawn, wat))\nforall x (Dissever(x, ladonna) and not Didder(ladonna, gene) -> Slangy(gene))\n\nHope(gene, wat)\n\nHope(gene, wat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The eda crunch the ursulina. The shirl is not cutting. The shirl is worshipped. The shirl is not unrevived. The shirl reiterate the aldwin. The shirl reiterate the ursulina. The aldwin crunch the eda. The aldwin crunch the shirl. The aldwin is planar. The aldwin unload the ursulina. The ursulina crunch the shirl. The ursulina crunch the aldwin. The ursulina is planar. The ursulina is diffused. The ursulina is worshipped. The ursulina unload the shirl. If something reiterate the ursulina then it unload the shirl. If something is unrevived then it unload the shirl. If something is unrevived and it crunch the ursulina then the ursulina unload the aldwin. If something reiterate the aldwin then it reiterate the ursulina. If something is worshipped and it crunch the aldwin then it crunch the ursulina. If something crunch the ursulina and it is worshipped then the ursulina is unrevived. If something unload the aldwin and the aldwin unload the ursulina then the aldwin crunch the eda. If something crunch the shirl and the shirl does not see the ursulina then the ursulina is cutting. The eda does not need the shirl.", "logic": "\nCrunch(eda, ursulina)\nnot Cutting(shirl)\nWorshipped(shirl)\nnot Unrevived(shirl)\nReiterate(shirl, aldwin)\nReiterate(shirl, ursulina)\nCrunch(aldwin, eda)\nCrunch(aldwin, shirl)\nPlanar(aldwin)\nUnload(aldwin, ursulina)\nCrunch(ursulina, shirl)\nCrunch(ursulina, aldwin)\nPlanar(ursulina)\nDiffused(ursulina)\nWorshipped(ursulina)\nUnload(ursulina, shirl)\nforall x (Reiterate(x, ursulina) -> Unload(x, shirl))\nforall x (Unrevived(x) -> Unload(x, shirl))\nforall x (Unrevived(x) and Crunch(x, ursulina) -> Unload(ursulina, aldwin))\nforall x (Reiterate(x, aldwin) -> Reiterate(x, ursulina))\nforall x (Worshipped(x) and Crunch(x, aldwin) -> Crunch(x, ursulina))\nforall x (Crunch(x, ursulina) and Worshipped(x) -> Unrevived(ursulina))\nforall x (Unload(x, aldwin) and Unload(aldwin, ursulina) -> Crunch(aldwin, eda))\nforall x (Crunch(x, shirl) and not Unload(shirl, ursulina) -> Cutting(ursulina))\n\nnot Reiterate(eda, shirl)\n\nnot Reiterate(eda, shirl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The gwenn scorn the isahella. The torrin is not unheated. The torrin is jugular. The torrin is not complex. The torrin sport the ettie. The torrin sport the isahella. The ettie scorn the gwenn. The ettie scorn the torrin. The ettie is vaulted. The ettie republish the isahella. The isahella scorn the torrin. The isahella scorn the ettie. The isahella is vaulted. The isahella is edentate. The isahella is jugular. The isahella republish the torrin. If something sport the isahella then it republish the torrin. If something is complex then it republish the torrin. If something is complex and it scorn the isahella then the isahella republish the ettie. If something sport the ettie then it sport the isahella. If something is jugular and it scorn the ettie then it scorn the isahella. If something scorn the isahella and it is jugular then the isahella is complex. If something republish the ettie and the ettie republish the isahella then the ettie scorn the gwenn. If something scorn the torrin and the torrin does not see the isahella then the isahella is unheated. The gwenn is complex.", "logic": "\nScorn(gwenn, isahella)\nnot Unheated(torrin)\nJugular(torrin)\nnot Complex(torrin)\nSport(torrin, ettie)\nSport(torrin, isahella)\nScorn(ettie, gwenn)\nScorn(ettie, torrin)\nVaulted(ettie)\nRepublish(ettie, isahella)\nScorn(isahella, torrin)\nScorn(isahella, ettie)\nVaulted(isahella)\nEdentate(isahella)\nJugular(isahella)\nRepublish(isahella, torrin)\nforall x (Sport(x, isahella) -> Republish(x, torrin))\nforall x (Complex(x) -> Republish(x, torrin))\nforall x (Complex(x) and Scorn(x, isahella) -> Republish(isahella, ettie))\nforall x (Sport(x, ettie) -> Sport(x, isahella))\nforall x (Jugular(x) and Scorn(x, ettie) -> Scorn(x, isahella))\nforall x (Scorn(x, isahella) and Jugular(x) -> Complex(isahella))\nforall x (Republish(x, ettie) and Republish(ettie, isahella) -> Scorn(ettie, gwenn))\nforall x (Scorn(x, torrin) and not Republish(torrin, isahella) -> Unheated(isahella))\n\nComplex(gwenn)\n\nComplex(gwenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Harald is captious. Kathlene is hindering. Nissa is separated. Nissa is reversible. Nissa is strangled. Marve is captious. Marve is reversible. If Kathlene is strangled and Kathlene is hindering then Kathlene is reversible. If someone is reversible then they are hindering. All captious, strangled people are reduced. Red, velvety people are strangled. All hindering people are captious. If someone is strangled and hindering then they are reversible. All separated, reduced people are reversible. Smart, strangled people are reversible. Nissa is strangled.", "logic": "\nCaptious(harald)\nHindering(kathlene)\nSeparated(nissa)\nReversible(nissa)\nStrangled(nissa)\nCaptious(marve)\nReversible(marve)\nStrangled(kathlene) and Hindering(kathlene) -> Reversible(kathlene)\nforall x (Reversible(x) -> Hindering(x))\nforall x (Captious(x) and Strangled(x) -> Reduced(x))\nforall x (Reversible(x) and Velvety(x) -> Strangled(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Captious(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) and Hindering(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Separated(x) and Reduced(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) and Strangled(x) -> Reversible(x))\n\nStrangled(nissa)\n\ntherefore Strangled(nissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Meggan is shrivelled. Viv is whirring. Case is sinitic. Case is grotty. Case is busybodied. Alena is shrivelled. Alena is grotty. If Viv is busybodied and Viv is whirring then Viv is grotty. If someone is grotty then they are whirring. All shrivelled, busybodied people are araceous. Red, biform people are busybodied. All whirring people are shrivelled. If someone is busybodied and whirring then they are grotty. All sinitic, araceous people are grotty. Smart, busybodied people are grotty. Alena is not grotty.", "logic": "\nShrivelled(meggan)\nWhirring(viv)\nSinitic(case)\nGrotty(case)\nBusybodied(case)\nShrivelled(alena)\nGrotty(alena)\nBusybodied(viv) and Whirring(viv) -> Grotty(viv)\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Shrivelled(x) and Busybodied(x) -> Araceous(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) and Biform(x) -> Busybodied(x))\nforall x (Whirring(x) -> Shrivelled(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) and Whirring(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) and Araceous(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) and Busybodied(x) -> Grotty(x))\n\nnot Grotty(alena)\n\ntherefore Grotty(alena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Dolli is bacchic. Tiffany is foliated. Forester is pale. Forester is revolting. Forester is unready. Avis is bacchic. Avis is revolting. If Tiffany is unready and Tiffany is foliated then Tiffany is revolting. If someone is revolting then they are foliated. All bacchic, unready people are brash. Red, darkened people are unready. All foliated people are bacchic. If someone is unready and foliated then they are revolting. All pale, brash people are revolting. Smart, unready people are revolting. Tiffany is bacchic.", "logic": "\nBacchic(dolli)\nFoliated(tiffany)\nPale(forester)\nRevolting(forester)\nUnready(forester)\nBacchic(avis)\nRevolting(avis)\nUnready(tiffany) and Foliated(tiffany) -> Revolting(tiffany)\nforall x (Revolting(x) -> Foliated(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Unready(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Revolting(x) and Darkened(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Foliated(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Foliated(x) -> Revolting(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) and Brash(x) -> Revolting(x))\nforall x (Brash(x) and Unready(x) -> Revolting(x))\n\nBacchic(tiffany)\n\nFoliated(tiffany) and forall x (Foliated(x) -> Bacchic(x)) -> therefore Bacchic(tiffany)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Illa is acanthous. Nancie is groveling. Ervin is canty. Ervin is hominian. Ervin is lyonnaise. Clarance is acanthous. Clarance is hominian. If Nancie is lyonnaise and Nancie is groveling then Nancie is hominian. If someone is hominian then they are groveling. All acanthous, lyonnaise people are trilled. Red, looseleaf people are lyonnaise. All groveling people are acanthous. If someone is lyonnaise and groveling then they are hominian. All canty, trilled people are hominian. Smart, lyonnaise people are hominian. Clarance is not groveling.", "logic": "\nAcanthous(illa)\nGroveling(nancie)\nCanty(ervin)\nHominian(ervin)\nLyonnaise(ervin)\nAcanthous(clarance)\nHominian(clarance)\nLyonnaise(nancie) and Groveling(nancie) -> Hominian(nancie)\nforall x (Hominian(x) -> Groveling(x))\nforall x (Acanthous(x) and Lyonnaise(x) -> Trilled(x))\nforall x (Hominian(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Groveling(x) -> Acanthous(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) and Groveling(x) -> Hominian(x))\nforall x (Canty(x) and Trilled(x) -> Hominian(x))\nforall x (Trilled(x) and Lyonnaise(x) -> Hominian(x))\n\nnot Groveling(clarance)\n\nHominian(clarance) and forall x (Hominian(x) -> Groveling(x)) -> therefore Groveling(clarance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Thacher is basaltic. Leroy is lilting. Laverna is dishonest. Laverna is endogenous. Laverna is reedlike. Lauryn is basaltic. Lauryn is endogenous. If Leroy is reedlike and Leroy is lilting then Leroy is endogenous. If someone is endogenous then they are lilting. All basaltic, reedlike people are galilean. Red, outboard people are reedlike. All lilting people are basaltic. If someone is reedlike and lilting then they are endogenous. All dishonest, galilean people are endogenous. Smart, reedlike people are endogenous. Laverna is basaltic.", "logic": "\nBasaltic(thacher)\nLilting(leroy)\nDishonest(laverna)\nEndogenous(laverna)\nReedlike(laverna)\nBasaltic(lauryn)\nEndogenous(lauryn)\nReedlike(leroy) and Lilting(leroy) -> Endogenous(leroy)\nforall x (Endogenous(x) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Reedlike(x) -> Galilean(x))\nforall x (Endogenous(x) and Outboard(x) -> Reedlike(x))\nforall x (Lilting(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Reedlike(x) and Lilting(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Dishonest(x) and Galilean(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) and Reedlike(x) -> Endogenous(x))\n\nBasaltic(laverna)\n\nEndogenous(laverna) and forall x (Endogenous(x) -> Lilting(x)) -> therefore Lilting(laverna) Lilting(laverna) and forall x (Lilting(x) -> Basaltic(x)) -> therefore Basaltic(laverna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Graehme is quickset. Dorri is pugilistic. Allin is unwashed. Allin is oversea. Allin is elite. Jimmy is quickset. Jimmy is oversea. If Dorri is elite and Dorri is pugilistic then Dorri is oversea. If someone is oversea then they are pugilistic. All quickset, elite people are rueful. Red, fusiform people are elite. All pugilistic people are quickset. If someone is elite and pugilistic then they are oversea. All unwashed, rueful people are oversea. Smart, elite people are oversea. Allin is not quickset.", "logic": "\nQuickset(graehme)\nPugilistic(dorri)\nUnwashed(allin)\nOversea(allin)\nElite(allin)\nQuickset(jimmy)\nOversea(jimmy)\nElite(dorri) and Pugilistic(dorri) -> Oversea(dorri)\nforall x (Oversea(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Quickset(x) and Elite(x) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Oversea(x) and Fusiform(x) -> Elite(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Elite(x) and Pugilistic(x) -> Oversea(x))\nforall x (Unwashed(x) and Rueful(x) -> Oversea(x))\nforall x (Rueful(x) and Elite(x) -> Oversea(x))\n\nnot Quickset(allin)\n\nOversea(allin) and forall x (Oversea(x) -> Pugilistic(x)) -> therefore Pugilistic(allin) Pugilistic(allin) and forall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Quickset(x)) -> therefore Quickset(allin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Gwenny is sotho. Kailey is delusive. Deni is mobbish. Deni is unsloped. Deni is patristic. Tamarra is sotho. Tamarra is unsloped. If Kailey is patristic and Kailey is delusive then Kailey is unsloped. If someone is unsloped then they are delusive. All sotho, patristic people are mined. Red, padded people are patristic. All delusive people are sotho. If someone is patristic and delusive then they are unsloped. All mobbish, mined people are unsloped. Smart, patristic people are unsloped. Deni is mined.", "logic": "\nSotho(gwenny)\nDelusive(kailey)\nMobbish(deni)\nUnsloped(deni)\nPatristic(deni)\nSotho(tamarra)\nUnsloped(tamarra)\nPatristic(kailey) and Delusive(kailey) -> Unsloped(kailey)\nforall x (Unsloped(x) -> Delusive(x))\nforall x (Sotho(x) and Patristic(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Unsloped(x) and Padded(x) -> Patristic(x))\nforall x (Delusive(x) -> Sotho(x))\nforall x (Patristic(x) and Delusive(x) -> Unsloped(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and Mined(x) -> Unsloped(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) and Patristic(x) -> Unsloped(x))\n\nMined(deni)\n\nUnsloped(deni) and forall x (Unsloped(x) -> Delusive(x)) -> therefore Delusive(deni) Delusive(deni) and forall x (Delusive(x) -> Sotho(x)) -> therefore Sotho(deni) Sotho(deni) and Patristic(deni) and forall x (Sotho(x) and Patristic(x) -> Mined(x)) -> therefore Mined(deni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Pammi is anterior. Tiphani is kashmiri. Gaynor is manlike. Gaynor is gradatory. Gaynor is hispid. Jandy is anterior. Jandy is gradatory. If Tiphani is hispid and Tiphani is kashmiri then Tiphani is gradatory. If someone is gradatory then they are kashmiri. All anterior, hispid people are unlittered. Red, spiritous people are hispid. All kashmiri people are anterior. If someone is hispid and kashmiri then they are gradatory. All manlike, unlittered people are gradatory. Smart, hispid people are gradatory. Gaynor is not unlittered.", "logic": "\nAnterior(pammi)\nKashmiri(tiphani)\nManlike(gaynor)\nGradatory(gaynor)\nHispid(gaynor)\nAnterior(jandy)\nGradatory(jandy)\nHispid(tiphani) and Kashmiri(tiphani) -> Gradatory(tiphani)\nforall x (Gradatory(x) -> Kashmiri(x))\nforall x (Anterior(x) and Hispid(x) -> Unlittered(x))\nforall x (Gradatory(x) and Spiritous(x) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Hispid(x) and Kashmiri(x) -> Gradatory(x))\nforall x (Manlike(x) and Unlittered(x) -> Gradatory(x))\nforall x (Unlittered(x) and Hispid(x) -> Gradatory(x))\n\nnot Unlittered(gaynor)\n\nGradatory(gaynor) and forall x (Gradatory(x) -> Kashmiri(x)) -> therefore Kashmiri(gaynor) Kashmiri(gaynor) and forall x (Kashmiri(x) -> Anterior(x)) -> therefore Anterior(gaynor) Anterior(gaynor) and Hispid(gaynor) and forall x (Anterior(x) and Hispid(x) -> Unlittered(x)) -> therefore Unlittered(gaynor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Blancha is eritrean. Hilary is suggestive. Ursula is alar. Ursula is uncomplete. Ursula is omnipotent. Robby is eritrean. Robby is uncomplete. If Hilary is omnipotent and Hilary is suggestive then Hilary is uncomplete. If someone is uncomplete then they are suggestive. All eritrean, omnipotent people are secondhand. Red, resolute people are omnipotent. All suggestive people are eritrean. If someone is omnipotent and suggestive then they are uncomplete. All alar, secondhand people are uncomplete. Smart, omnipotent people are uncomplete. Blancha is not omnipotent.", "logic": "\nEritrean(blancha)\nSuggestive(hilary)\nAlar(ursula)\nUncomplete(ursula)\nOmnipotent(ursula)\nEritrean(robby)\nUncomplete(robby)\nOmnipotent(hilary) and Suggestive(hilary) -> Uncomplete(hilary)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Eritrean(x) and Omnipotent(x) -> Secondhand(x))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Resolute(x) -> Omnipotent(x))\nforall x (Suggestive(x) -> Eritrean(x))\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) and Suggestive(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nforall x (Alar(x) and Secondhand(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Omnipotent(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\n\nnot Omnipotent(blancha)\n\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Resolute(x) -> Omnipotent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Joanie is disarrayed. Goldi is callow. Erika is handed. Erika is folksy. Erika is devoted. Kirstyn is disarrayed. Kirstyn is folksy. If Goldi is devoted and Goldi is callow then Goldi is folksy. If someone is folksy then they are callow. All disarrayed, devoted people are generative. Red, assuasive people are devoted. All callow people are disarrayed. If someone is devoted and callow then they are folksy. All handed, generative people are folksy. Smart, devoted people are folksy. Kirstyn is generative.", "logic": "\nDisarrayed(joanie)\nCallow(goldi)\nHanded(erika)\nFolksy(erika)\nDevoted(erika)\nDisarrayed(kirstyn)\nFolksy(kirstyn)\nDevoted(goldi) and Callow(goldi) -> Folksy(goldi)\nforall x (Folksy(x) -> Callow(x))\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) and Devoted(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Folksy(x) and Assuasive(x) -> Devoted(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) -> Disarrayed(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) and Callow(x) -> Folksy(x))\nforall x (Handed(x) and Generative(x) -> Folksy(x))\nforall x (Generative(x) and Devoted(x) -> Folksy(x))\n\nGenerative(kirstyn)\n\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) and Devoted(x) -> Generative(x)) <- forall x (Folksy(x) and Assuasive(x) -> Devoted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Ulla is balletic. Lissie is scrimpy. Britt is avaricious. Britt is unlabelled. Britt is cranky. Charlotta is balletic. Charlotta is unlabelled. If Lissie is cranky and Lissie is scrimpy then Lissie is unlabelled. If someone is unlabelled then they are scrimpy. All balletic, cranky people are impetuous. Red, nineteen people are cranky. All scrimpy people are balletic. If someone is cranky and scrimpy then they are unlabelled. All avaricious, impetuous people are unlabelled. Smart, cranky people are unlabelled. Lissie is not unlabelled.", "logic": "\nBalletic(ulla)\nScrimpy(lissie)\nAvaricious(britt)\nUnlabelled(britt)\nCranky(britt)\nBalletic(charlotta)\nUnlabelled(charlotta)\nCranky(lissie) and Scrimpy(lissie) -> Unlabelled(lissie)\nforall x (Unlabelled(x) -> Scrimpy(x))\nforall x (Balletic(x) and Cranky(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Unlabelled(x) and Nineteen(x) -> Cranky(x))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) -> Balletic(x))\nforall x (Cranky(x) and Scrimpy(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) and Impetuous(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and Cranky(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\n\nnot Unlabelled(lissie)\n\nCranky(lissie) and Scrimpy(lissie) -> Unlabelled(lissie) <- forall x (Unlabelled(x) and Nineteen(x) -> Cranky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Flipper is phlegmy. Wynnie is gasified. Marwin is unpromised. Marwin is insentient. Marwin is dystopian. Ruddie is phlegmy. Ruddie is insentient. If Wynnie is dystopian and Wynnie is gasified then Wynnie is insentient. If someone is insentient then they are gasified. All phlegmy, dystopian people are flimsy. Red, unopen people are dystopian. All gasified people are phlegmy. If someone is dystopian and gasified then they are insentient. All unpromised, flimsy people are insentient. Smart, dystopian people are insentient. Flipper is insentient.", "logic": "\nPhlegmy(flipper)\nGasified(wynnie)\nUnpromised(marwin)\nInsentient(marwin)\nDystopian(marwin)\nPhlegmy(ruddie)\nInsentient(ruddie)\nDystopian(wynnie) and Gasified(wynnie) -> Insentient(wynnie)\nforall x (Insentient(x) -> Gasified(x))\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) and Dystopian(x) -> Flimsy(x))\nforall x (Insentient(x) and Unopen(x) -> Dystopian(x))\nforall x (Gasified(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\nforall x (Dystopian(x) and Gasified(x) -> Insentient(x))\nforall x (Unpromised(x) and Flimsy(x) -> Insentient(x))\nforall x (Flimsy(x) and Dystopian(x) -> Insentient(x))\n\nInsentient(flipper)\n\nforall x (Dystopian(x) and Gasified(x) -> Insentient(x)) <- forall x (Insentient(x) and Unopen(x) -> Dystopian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Rafa is mosstone. Connor is chilean. Dimitry is abient. Dimitry is unsized. Dimitry is cuplike. Anni is mosstone. Anni is unsized. If Connor is cuplike and Connor is chilean then Connor is unsized. If someone is unsized then they are chilean. All mosstone, cuplike people are bigeneric. Red, anuran people are cuplike. All chilean people are mosstone. If someone is cuplike and chilean then they are unsized. All abient, bigeneric people are unsized. Smart, cuplike people are unsized. Anni is not anuran.", "logic": "\nMosstone(rafa)\nChilean(connor)\nAbient(dimitry)\nUnsized(dimitry)\nCuplike(dimitry)\nMosstone(anni)\nUnsized(anni)\nCuplike(connor) and Chilean(connor) -> Unsized(connor)\nforall x (Unsized(x) -> Chilean(x))\nforall x (Mosstone(x) and Cuplike(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nforall x (Unsized(x) and Anuran(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nforall x (Chilean(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Cuplike(x) and Chilean(x) -> Unsized(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) and Bigeneric(x) -> Unsized(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Cuplike(x) -> Unsized(x))\n\nnot Anuran(anni)\n\nnot Anuran(anni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Phedra is cleavable. Traver is noseless. Carmina is dyspneal. Carmina is toupeed. Carmina is sunburned. Claudette is cleavable. Claudette is toupeed. If Traver is sunburned and Traver is noseless then Traver is toupeed. If someone is toupeed then they are noseless. All cleavable, sunburned people are twiglike. Red, coordinate people are sunburned. All noseless people are cleavable. If someone is sunburned and noseless then they are toupeed. All dyspneal, twiglike people are toupeed. Smart, sunburned people are toupeed. Phedra is dyspneal.", "logic": "\nCleavable(phedra)\nNoseless(traver)\nDyspneal(carmina)\nToupeed(carmina)\nSunburned(carmina)\nCleavable(claudette)\nToupeed(claudette)\nSunburned(traver) and Noseless(traver) -> Toupeed(traver)\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Noseless(x))\nforall x (Cleavable(x) and Sunburned(x) -> Twiglike(x))\nforall x (Toupeed(x) and Coordinate(x) -> Sunburned(x))\nforall x (Noseless(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) and Noseless(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and Twiglike(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Twiglike(x) and Sunburned(x) -> Toupeed(x))\n\nDyspneal(phedra)\n\nDyspneal(phedra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Katheryn is diarrheic. Peri is soapy. Antonetta is citified. Antonetta is unlettered. Antonetta is outspread. Carolie is diarrheic. Carolie is unlettered. If Peri is outspread and Peri is soapy then Peri is unlettered. If someone is unlettered then they are soapy. All diarrheic, outspread people are salientian. Red, despotic people are outspread. All soapy people are diarrheic. If someone is outspread and soapy then they are unlettered. All citified, salientian people are unlettered. Smart, outspread people are unlettered. Antonetta is not despotic.", "logic": "\nDiarrheic(katheryn)\nSoapy(peri)\nCitified(antonetta)\nUnlettered(antonetta)\nOutspread(antonetta)\nDiarrheic(carolie)\nUnlettered(carolie)\nOutspread(peri) and Soapy(peri) -> Unlettered(peri)\nforall x (Unlettered(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Outspread(x) -> Salientian(x))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) and Despotic(x) -> Outspread(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) -> Diarrheic(x))\nforall x (Outspread(x) and Soapy(x) -> Unlettered(x))\nforall x (Citified(x) and Salientian(x) -> Unlettered(x))\nforall x (Salientian(x) and Outspread(x) -> Unlettered(x))\n\nnot Despotic(antonetta)\n\nnot Despotic(antonetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Claribel is unfeminine. Baron is glutted. Robenia is fatheaded. Robenia is bellied. Robenia is chimeric. Zedekiah is unfeminine. Zedekiah is bellied. If Baron is chimeric and Baron is glutted then Baron is bellied. If someone is bellied then they are glutted. All unfeminine, chimeric people are labored. Red, diabetic people are chimeric. All glutted people are unfeminine. If someone is chimeric and glutted then they are bellied. All fatheaded, labored people are bellied. Smart, chimeric people are bellied. Baron is diabetic.", "logic": "\nUnfeminine(claribel)\nGlutted(baron)\nFatheaded(robenia)\nBellied(robenia)\nChimeric(robenia)\nUnfeminine(zedekiah)\nBellied(zedekiah)\nChimeric(baron) and Glutted(baron) -> Bellied(baron)\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> Glutted(x))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and Chimeric(x) -> Labored(x))\nforall x (Bellied(x) and Diabetic(x) -> Chimeric(x))\nforall x (Glutted(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) and Glutted(x) -> Bellied(x))\nforall x (Fatheaded(x) and Labored(x) -> Bellied(x))\nforall x (Labored(x) and Chimeric(x) -> Bellied(x))\n\nDiabetic(baron)\n\nDiabetic(baron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "The prudy skank the magdalen. The prudy mercerise the magdalen. The prudy pigment the magdalen. The magdalen skank the prudy. The magdalen mercerise the prudy. The magdalen is belated. The magdalen pigment the prudy. If the magdalen pigment the prudy and the magdalen is dissolute then the magdalen mercerise the prudy. If something pigment the prudy then it mercerise the magdalen. If something mercerise the magdalen then it skank the magdalen. If something mercerise the magdalen then the magdalen skank the prudy. If something skank the prudy then the prudy skank the magdalen. All homologous things are corsican. If something skank the magdalen then it is corsican. Red things are dissolute. The prudy skank the magdalen.", "logic": "\nSkank(prudy, magdalen)\nMercerise(prudy, magdalen)\nPigment(prudy, magdalen)\nSkank(magdalen, prudy)\nMercerise(magdalen, prudy)\nBelated(magdalen)\nPigment(magdalen, prudy)\nPigment(magdalen, prudy) and Dissolute(magdalen) -> Mercerise(magdalen, prudy)\nforall x (Pigment(x, prudy) -> Mercerise(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, magdalen) -> Skank(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, magdalen) -> Skank(magdalen, prudy))\nforall x (Skank(x, prudy) -> Skank(prudy, magdalen))\nforall x (Homologous(x) -> Corsican(x))\nforall x (Skank(x, magdalen) -> Corsican(x))\nforall x (Homologous(x) -> Dissolute(x))\n\nSkank(prudy, magdalen)\n\ntherefore Skank(prudy, magdalen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The milly sojourn the charleen. The milly bruise the charleen. The milly jinx the charleen. The charleen sojourn the milly. The charleen bruise the milly. The charleen is sensitized. The charleen jinx the milly. If the charleen jinx the milly and the charleen is animating then the charleen bruise the milly. If something jinx the milly then it bruise the charleen. If something bruise the charleen then it sojourn the charleen. If something bruise the charleen then the charleen sojourn the milly. If something sojourn the milly then the milly sojourn the charleen. All grabby things are napping. If something sojourn the charleen then it is napping. Red things are animating. The milly does not like the charleen.", "logic": "\nSojourn(milly, charleen)\nBruise(milly, charleen)\nJinx(milly, charleen)\nSojourn(charleen, milly)\nBruise(charleen, milly)\nSensitized(charleen)\nJinx(charleen, milly)\nJinx(charleen, milly) and Animating(charleen) -> Bruise(charleen, milly)\nforall x (Jinx(x, milly) -> Bruise(x, charleen))\nforall x (Bruise(x, charleen) -> Sojourn(x, charleen))\nforall x (Bruise(x, charleen) -> Sojourn(charleen, milly))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, milly) -> Sojourn(milly, charleen))\nforall x (Grabby(x) -> Napping(x))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, charleen) -> Napping(x))\nforall x (Grabby(x) -> Animating(x))\n\nnot Jinx(milly, charleen)\n\ntherefore Jinx(milly, charleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The lorelle extirpate the birdie. The lorelle render the birdie. The lorelle output the birdie. The birdie extirpate the lorelle. The birdie render the lorelle. The birdie is swingy. The birdie output the lorelle. If the birdie output the lorelle and the birdie is exhaustive then the birdie render the lorelle. If something output the lorelle then it render the birdie. If something render the birdie then it extirpate the birdie. If something render the birdie then the birdie extirpate the lorelle. If something extirpate the lorelle then the lorelle extirpate the birdie. All hugoesque things are shipboard. If something extirpate the birdie then it is shipboard. Red things are exhaustive. The lorelle is shipboard.", "logic": "\nExtirpate(lorelle, birdie)\nRender(lorelle, birdie)\nOutput(lorelle, birdie)\nExtirpate(birdie, lorelle)\nRender(birdie, lorelle)\nSwingy(birdie)\nOutput(birdie, lorelle)\nOutput(birdie, lorelle) and Exhaustive(birdie) -> Render(birdie, lorelle)\nforall x (Output(x, lorelle) -> Render(x, birdie))\nforall x (Render(x, birdie) -> Extirpate(x, birdie))\nforall x (Render(x, birdie) -> Extirpate(birdie, lorelle))\nforall x (Extirpate(x, lorelle) -> Extirpate(lorelle, birdie))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Extirpate(x, birdie) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\n\nShipboard(lorelle)\n\nExtirpate(lorelle, birdie) and forall x (Extirpate(x, birdie) -> Shipboard(x)) -> therefore Shipboard(lorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The lucky dyke the vachel. The lucky foment the vachel. The lucky schuss the vachel. The vachel dyke the lucky. The vachel foment the lucky. The vachel is bulgy. The vachel schuss the lucky. If the vachel schuss the lucky and the vachel is charitable then the vachel foment the lucky. If something schuss the lucky then it foment the vachel. If something foment the vachel then it dyke the vachel. If something foment the vachel then the vachel dyke the lucky. If something dyke the lucky then the lucky dyke the vachel. All bilgy things are direful. If something dyke the vachel then it is direful. Red things are charitable. The lucky is not direful.", "logic": "\nDyke(lucky, vachel)\nFoment(lucky, vachel)\nSchuss(lucky, vachel)\nDyke(vachel, lucky)\nFoment(vachel, lucky)\nBulgy(vachel)\nSchuss(vachel, lucky)\nSchuss(vachel, lucky) and Charitable(vachel) -> Foment(vachel, lucky)\nforall x (Schuss(x, lucky) -> Foment(x, vachel))\nforall x (Foment(x, vachel) -> Dyke(x, vachel))\nforall x (Foment(x, vachel) -> Dyke(vachel, lucky))\nforall x (Dyke(x, lucky) -> Dyke(lucky, vachel))\nforall x (Bilgy(x) -> Direful(x))\nforall x (Dyke(x, vachel) -> Direful(x))\nforall x (Bilgy(x) -> Charitable(x))\n\nnot Direful(lucky)\n\nDyke(lucky, vachel) and forall x (Dyke(x, vachel) -> Direful(x)) -> therefore Direful(lucky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The mandie raddle the marina. The mandie gong the marina. The mandie quintuple the marina. The marina raddle the mandie. The marina gong the mandie. The marina is afghani. The marina quintuple the mandie. If the marina quintuple the mandie and the marina is sacked then the marina gong the mandie. If something quintuple the mandie then it gong the marina. If something gong the marina then it raddle the marina. If something gong the marina then the marina raddle the mandie. If something raddle the mandie then the mandie raddle the marina. All unmixed things are awry. If something raddle the marina then it is awry. Red things are sacked. The marina raddle the marina.", "logic": "\nRaddle(mandie, marina)\nGong(mandie, marina)\nQuintuple(mandie, marina)\nRaddle(marina, mandie)\nGong(marina, mandie)\nAfghani(marina)\nQuintuple(marina, mandie)\nQuintuple(marina, mandie) and Sacked(marina) -> Gong(marina, mandie)\nforall x (Quintuple(x, mandie) -> Gong(x, marina))\nforall x (Gong(x, marina) -> Raddle(x, marina))\nforall x (Gong(x, marina) -> Raddle(marina, mandie))\nforall x (Raddle(x, mandie) -> Raddle(mandie, marina))\nforall x (Unmixed(x) -> Awry(x))\nforall x (Raddle(x, marina) -> Awry(x))\nforall x (Unmixed(x) -> Sacked(x))\n\nRaddle(marina, marina)\n\nQuintuple(marina, mandie) and forall x (Quintuple(x, mandie) -> Gong(x, marina)) -> therefore Gong(marina, marina) Gong(marina, marina) and forall x (Gong(x, marina) -> Raddle(x, marina)) -> therefore Raddle(marina, marina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The romy coapt the jereme. The romy handwash the jereme. The romy yawl the jereme. The jereme coapt the romy. The jereme handwash the romy. The jereme is fibreoptic. The jereme yawl the romy. If the jereme yawl the romy and the jereme is removable then the jereme handwash the romy. If something yawl the romy then it handwash the jereme. If something handwash the jereme then it coapt the jereme. If something handwash the jereme then the jereme coapt the romy. If something coapt the romy then the romy coapt the jereme. All deviate things are relieved. If something coapt the jereme then it is relieved. Red things are removable. The jereme does not chase the jereme.", "logic": "\nCoapt(romy, jereme)\nHandwash(romy, jereme)\nYawl(romy, jereme)\nCoapt(jereme, romy)\nHandwash(jereme, romy)\nFibreoptic(jereme)\nYawl(jereme, romy)\nYawl(jereme, romy) and Removable(jereme) -> Handwash(jereme, romy)\nforall x (Yawl(x, romy) -> Handwash(x, jereme))\nforall x (Handwash(x, jereme) -> Coapt(x, jereme))\nforall x (Handwash(x, jereme) -> Coapt(jereme, romy))\nforall x (Coapt(x, romy) -> Coapt(romy, jereme))\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Coapt(x, jereme) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Removable(x))\n\nnot Coapt(jereme, jereme)\n\nYawl(jereme, romy) and forall x (Yawl(x, romy) -> Handwash(x, jereme)) -> therefore Handwash(jereme, jereme) Handwash(jereme, jereme) and forall x (Handwash(x, jereme) -> Coapt(x, jereme)) -> therefore Coapt(jereme, jereme)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The pietro dislodge the velvet. The pietro bridle the velvet. The pietro nurse the velvet. The velvet dislodge the pietro. The velvet bridle the pietro. The velvet is guttural. The velvet nurse the pietro. If the velvet nurse the pietro and the velvet is unanalyzed then the velvet bridle the pietro. If something nurse the pietro then it bridle the velvet. If something bridle the velvet then it dislodge the velvet. If something bridle the velvet then the velvet dislodge the pietro. If something dislodge the pietro then the pietro dislodge the velvet. All maternal things are unowned. If something dislodge the velvet then it is unowned. Red things are unanalyzed. The velvet is unowned.", "logic": "\nDislodge(pietro, velvet)\nBridle(pietro, velvet)\nNurse(pietro, velvet)\nDislodge(velvet, pietro)\nBridle(velvet, pietro)\nGuttural(velvet)\nNurse(velvet, pietro)\nNurse(velvet, pietro) and Unanalyzed(velvet) -> Bridle(velvet, pietro)\nforall x (Nurse(x, pietro) -> Bridle(x, velvet))\nforall x (Bridle(x, velvet) -> Dislodge(x, velvet))\nforall x (Bridle(x, velvet) -> Dislodge(velvet, pietro))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, pietro) -> Dislodge(pietro, velvet))\nforall x (Maternal(x) -> Unowned(x))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, velvet) -> Unowned(x))\nforall x (Maternal(x) -> Unanalyzed(x))\n\nUnowned(velvet)\n\nNurse(velvet, pietro) and forall x (Nurse(x, pietro) -> Bridle(x, velvet)) -> therefore Bridle(velvet, velvet) Bridle(velvet, velvet) and forall x (Bridle(x, velvet) -> Dislodge(x, velvet)) -> therefore Dislodge(velvet, velvet) Dislodge(velvet, velvet) and forall x (Dislodge(x, velvet) -> Unowned(x)) -> therefore Unowned(velvet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The hill brief the kalman. The hill demand the kalman. The hill sneer the kalman. The kalman brief the hill. The kalman demand the hill. The kalman is vacant. The kalman sneer the hill. If the kalman sneer the hill and the kalman is oxonian then the kalman demand the hill. If something sneer the hill then it demand the kalman. If something demand the kalman then it brief the kalman. If something demand the kalman then the kalman brief the hill. If something brief the hill then the hill brief the kalman. All anarchic things are fetal. If something brief the kalman then it is fetal. Red things are oxonian. The kalman is not fetal.", "logic": "\nBrief(hill, kalman)\nDemand(hill, kalman)\nSneer(hill, kalman)\nBrief(kalman, hill)\nDemand(kalman, hill)\nVacant(kalman)\nSneer(kalman, hill)\nSneer(kalman, hill) and Oxonian(kalman) -> Demand(kalman, hill)\nforall x (Sneer(x, hill) -> Demand(x, kalman))\nforall x (Demand(x, kalman) -> Brief(x, kalman))\nforall x (Demand(x, kalman) -> Brief(kalman, hill))\nforall x (Brief(x, hill) -> Brief(hill, kalman))\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Brief(x, kalman) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Oxonian(x))\n\nnot Fetal(kalman)\n\nSneer(kalman, hill) and forall x (Sneer(x, hill) -> Demand(x, kalman)) -> therefore Demand(kalman, kalman) Demand(kalman, kalman) and forall x (Demand(x, kalman) -> Brief(x, kalman)) -> therefore Brief(kalman, kalman) Brief(kalman, kalman) and forall x (Brief(x, kalman) -> Fetal(x)) -> therefore Fetal(kalman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The jacques nuke the chester. The jacques roil the chester. The jacques portion the chester. The chester nuke the jacques. The chester roil the jacques. The chester is worrisome. The chester portion the jacques. If the chester portion the jacques and the chester is carboxyl then the chester roil the jacques. If something portion the jacques then it roil the chester. If something roil the chester then it nuke the chester. If something roil the chester then the chester nuke the jacques. If something nuke the jacques then the jacques nuke the chester. All broad things are nebulous. If something nuke the chester then it is nebulous. Red things are carboxyl. The chester is not carboxyl.", "logic": "\nNuke(jacques, chester)\nRoil(jacques, chester)\nPortion(jacques, chester)\nNuke(chester, jacques)\nRoil(chester, jacques)\nWorrisome(chester)\nPortion(chester, jacques)\nPortion(chester, jacques) and Carboxyl(chester) -> Roil(chester, jacques)\nforall x (Portion(x, jacques) -> Roil(x, chester))\nforall x (Roil(x, chester) -> Nuke(x, chester))\nforall x (Roil(x, chester) -> Nuke(chester, jacques))\nforall x (Nuke(x, jacques) -> Nuke(jacques, chester))\nforall x (Broad(x) -> Nebulous(x))\nforall x (Nuke(x, chester) -> Nebulous(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\n\nnot Carboxyl(chester)\n\nforall x (Broad(x) -> Carboxyl(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The perri gestate the ivie. The perri regularise the ivie. The perri biodegrade the ivie. The ivie gestate the perri. The ivie regularise the perri. The ivie is liveable. The ivie biodegrade the perri. If the ivie biodegrade the perri and the ivie is deviant then the ivie regularise the perri. If something biodegrade the perri then it regularise the ivie. If something regularise the ivie then it gestate the ivie. If something regularise the ivie then the ivie gestate the perri. If something gestate the perri then the perri gestate the ivie. All salaried things are hairless. If something gestate the ivie then it is hairless. Red things are deviant. The perri is deviant.", "logic": "\nGestate(perri, ivie)\nRegularise(perri, ivie)\nBiodegrade(perri, ivie)\nGestate(ivie, perri)\nRegularise(ivie, perri)\nLiveable(ivie)\nBiodegrade(ivie, perri)\nBiodegrade(ivie, perri) and Deviant(ivie) -> Regularise(ivie, perri)\nforall x (Biodegrade(x, perri) -> Regularise(x, ivie))\nforall x (Regularise(x, ivie) -> Gestate(x, ivie))\nforall x (Regularise(x, ivie) -> Gestate(ivie, perri))\nforall x (Gestate(x, perri) -> Gestate(perri, ivie))\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Gestate(x, ivie) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Deviant(x))\n\nDeviant(perri)\n\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Deviant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The jennette iron the janot. The jennette esterify the janot. The jennette cranch the janot. The janot iron the jennette. The janot esterify the jennette. The janot is beneficial. The janot cranch the jennette. If the janot cranch the jennette and the janot is rapturous then the janot esterify the jennette. If something cranch the jennette then it esterify the janot. If something esterify the janot then it iron the janot. If something esterify the janot then the janot iron the jennette. If something iron the jennette then the jennette iron the janot. All unbranched things are skinny. If something iron the janot then it is skinny. Red things are rapturous. The jennette does not like the jennette.", "logic": "\nIron(jennette, janot)\nEsterify(jennette, janot)\nCranch(jennette, janot)\nIron(janot, jennette)\nEsterify(janot, jennette)\nBeneficial(janot)\nCranch(janot, jennette)\nCranch(janot, jennette) and Rapturous(janot) -> Esterify(janot, jennette)\nforall x (Cranch(x, jennette) -> Esterify(x, janot))\nforall x (Esterify(x, janot) -> Iron(x, janot))\nforall x (Esterify(x, janot) -> Iron(janot, jennette))\nforall x (Iron(x, jennette) -> Iron(jennette, janot))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Iron(x, janot) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Rapturous(x))\n\nnot Cranch(jennette, jennette)\n\nnot Cranch(jennette, jennette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The cliff bedim the xylina. The cliff aerosolize the xylina. The cliff inunct the xylina. The xylina bedim the cliff. The xylina aerosolize the cliff. The xylina is lancelike. The xylina inunct the cliff. If the xylina inunct the cliff and the xylina is oral then the xylina aerosolize the cliff. If something inunct the cliff then it aerosolize the xylina. If something aerosolize the xylina then it bedim the xylina. If something aerosolize the xylina then the xylina bedim the cliff. If something bedim the cliff then the cliff bedim the xylina. All smoothed things are whacked. If something bedim the xylina then it is whacked. Red things are oral. The xylina inunct the xylina.", "logic": "\nBedim(cliff, xylina)\nAerosolize(cliff, xylina)\nInunct(cliff, xylina)\nBedim(xylina, cliff)\nAerosolize(xylina, cliff)\nLancelike(xylina)\nInunct(xylina, cliff)\nInunct(xylina, cliff) and Oral(xylina) -> Aerosolize(xylina, cliff)\nforall x (Inunct(x, cliff) -> Aerosolize(x, xylina))\nforall x (Aerosolize(x, xylina) -> Bedim(x, xylina))\nforall x (Aerosolize(x, xylina) -> Bedim(xylina, cliff))\nforall x (Bedim(x, cliff) -> Bedim(cliff, xylina))\nforall x (Smoothed(x) -> Whacked(x))\nforall x (Bedim(x, xylina) -> Whacked(x))\nforall x (Smoothed(x) -> Oral(x))\n\nInunct(xylina, xylina)\n\nInunct(xylina, xylina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The maude slosh the kaja. The maude fusillade the kaja. The maude denominate the kaja. The kaja slosh the maude. The kaja fusillade the maude. The kaja is unnoted. The kaja denominate the maude. If the kaja denominate the maude and the kaja is tabu then the kaja fusillade the maude. If something denominate the maude then it fusillade the kaja. If something fusillade the kaja then it slosh the kaja. If something fusillade the kaja then the kaja slosh the maude. If something slosh the maude then the maude slosh the kaja. All stomatal things are nonnatural. If something slosh the kaja then it is nonnatural. Red things are tabu. The maude does not chase the maude.", "logic": "\nSlosh(maude, kaja)\nFusillade(maude, kaja)\nDenominate(maude, kaja)\nSlosh(kaja, maude)\nFusillade(kaja, maude)\nUnnoted(kaja)\nDenominate(kaja, maude)\nDenominate(kaja, maude) and Tabu(kaja) -> Fusillade(kaja, maude)\nforall x (Denominate(x, maude) -> Fusillade(x, kaja))\nforall x (Fusillade(x, kaja) -> Slosh(x, kaja))\nforall x (Fusillade(x, kaja) -> Slosh(kaja, maude))\nforall x (Slosh(x, maude) -> Slosh(maude, kaja))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Slosh(x, kaja) -> Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> Tabu(x))\n\nnot Slosh(maude, maude)\n\nnot Slosh(maude, maude) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The dorree opalise the kenyon. The dorree whirr the kenyon. The dorree theme the kenyon. The kenyon opalise the dorree. The kenyon whirr the dorree. The kenyon is tricky. The kenyon theme the dorree. If the kenyon theme the dorree and the kenyon is dyslexic then the kenyon whirr the dorree. If something theme the dorree then it whirr the kenyon. If something whirr the kenyon then it opalise the kenyon. If something whirr the kenyon then the kenyon opalise the dorree. If something opalise the dorree then the dorree opalise the kenyon. All catarrhal things are delicious. If something opalise the kenyon then it is delicious. Red things are dyslexic. The dorree is catarrhal.", "logic": "\nOpalise(dorree, kenyon)\nWhirr(dorree, kenyon)\nTheme(dorree, kenyon)\nOpalise(kenyon, dorree)\nWhirr(kenyon, dorree)\nTricky(kenyon)\nTheme(kenyon, dorree)\nTheme(kenyon, dorree) and Dyslexic(kenyon) -> Whirr(kenyon, dorree)\nforall x (Theme(x, dorree) -> Whirr(x, kenyon))\nforall x (Whirr(x, kenyon) -> Opalise(x, kenyon))\nforall x (Whirr(x, kenyon) -> Opalise(kenyon, dorree))\nforall x (Opalise(x, dorree) -> Opalise(dorree, kenyon))\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) -> Delicious(x))\nforall x (Opalise(x, kenyon) -> Delicious(x))\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) -> Dyslexic(x))\n\nCatarrhal(dorree)\n\nCatarrhal(dorree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The candace finalize the silvano. The candace contest the silvano. The candace kitten the silvano. The silvano finalize the candace. The silvano contest the candace. The silvano is sunbaked. The silvano kitten the candace. If the silvano kitten the candace and the silvano is bodiless then the silvano contest the candace. If something kitten the candace then it contest the silvano. If something contest the silvano then it finalize the silvano. If something contest the silvano then the silvano finalize the candace. If something finalize the candace then the candace finalize the silvano. All mammoth things are acarpelous. If something finalize the silvano then it is acarpelous. Red things are bodiless. The candace is not sunbaked.", "logic": "\nFinalize(candace, silvano)\nContest(candace, silvano)\nKitten(candace, silvano)\nFinalize(silvano, candace)\nContest(silvano, candace)\nSunbaked(silvano)\nKitten(silvano, candace)\nKitten(silvano, candace) and Bodiless(silvano) -> Contest(silvano, candace)\nforall x (Kitten(x, candace) -> Contest(x, silvano))\nforall x (Contest(x, silvano) -> Finalize(x, silvano))\nforall x (Contest(x, silvano) -> Finalize(silvano, candace))\nforall x (Finalize(x, candace) -> Finalize(candace, silvano))\nforall x (Mammoth(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Finalize(x, silvano) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Mammoth(x) -> Bodiless(x))\n\nnot Sunbaked(candace)\n\nnot Sunbaked(candace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The ramsey solmizate the taber. The ramsey summarize the taber. The ramsey racketeer the taber. The taber solmizate the ramsey. The taber summarize the ramsey. The taber is infallible. The taber racketeer the ramsey. If the taber racketeer the ramsey and the taber is glottal then the taber summarize the ramsey. If something racketeer the ramsey then it summarize the taber. If something summarize the taber then it solmizate the taber. If something summarize the taber then the taber solmizate the ramsey. If something solmizate the ramsey then the ramsey solmizate the taber. All orienting things are logistical. If something solmizate the taber then it is logistical. Red things are glottal. The ramsey summarize the ramsey.", "logic": "\nSolmizate(ramsey, taber)\nSummarize(ramsey, taber)\nRacketeer(ramsey, taber)\nSolmizate(taber, ramsey)\nSummarize(taber, ramsey)\nInfallible(taber)\nRacketeer(taber, ramsey)\nRacketeer(taber, ramsey) and Glottal(taber) -> Summarize(taber, ramsey)\nforall x (Racketeer(x, ramsey) -> Summarize(x, taber))\nforall x (Summarize(x, taber) -> Solmizate(x, taber))\nforall x (Summarize(x, taber) -> Solmizate(taber, ramsey))\nforall x (Solmizate(x, ramsey) -> Solmizate(ramsey, taber))\nforall x (Orienting(x) -> Logistical(x))\nforall x (Solmizate(x, taber) -> Logistical(x))\nforall x (Orienting(x) -> Glottal(x))\n\nSummarize(ramsey, ramsey)\n\nSummarize(ramsey, ramsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The melodee is muffled. If the melodee is muffled and the melodee is sloping then the melodee is starchlike. All muffled things are sloping. If the melodee is haematic then the melodee is toned. If something is toned and not starchlike then it is haematic. Blue things are toned. All starchlike, muffled things are not toned. The melodee is muffled.", "logic": "\nMuffled(melodee)\nMuffled(melodee) and Sloping(melodee) -> Starchlike(melodee)\nforall x (Muffled(x) -> Sloping(x))\nHaematic(melodee) -> Toned(melodee)\nforall x (Toned(x) and not Starchlike(x) -> Haematic(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Starchlike(x) and Muffled(x) -> not Toned(x))\n\nMuffled(melodee)\n\ntherefore Muffled(melodee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The randee is then. If the randee is then and the randee is esoteric then the randee is opalescent. All then things are esoteric. If the randee is hasty then the randee is putative. If something is putative and not opalescent then it is hasty. Blue things are putative. All opalescent, then things are not putative. The randee is not then.", "logic": "\nThen(randee)\nThen(randee) and Esoteric(randee) -> Opalescent(randee)\nforall x (Then(x) -> Esoteric(x))\nHasty(randee) -> Putative(randee)\nforall x (Putative(x) and not Opalescent(x) -> Hasty(x))\nforall x (Hasty(x) -> Putative(x))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) and Then(x) -> not Putative(x))\n\nnot Then(randee)\n\ntherefore Then(randee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The phil is relative. If the phil is relative and the phil is endurable then the phil is nonslip. All relative things are endurable. If the phil is cryonic then the phil is croatian. If something is croatian and not nonslip then it is cryonic. Blue things are croatian. All nonslip, relative things are not croatian. The phil is endurable.", "logic": "\nRelative(phil)\nRelative(phil) and Endurable(phil) -> Nonslip(phil)\nforall x (Relative(x) -> Endurable(x))\nCryonic(phil) -> Croatian(phil)\nforall x (Croatian(x) and not Nonslip(x) -> Cryonic(x))\nforall x (Cryonic(x) -> Croatian(x))\nforall x (Nonslip(x) and Relative(x) -> not Croatian(x))\n\nEndurable(phil)\n\nRelative(phil) and forall x (Relative(x) -> Endurable(x)) -> therefore Endurable(phil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The leighton is panamanian. If the leighton is panamanian and the leighton is zodiacal then the leighton is searing. All panamanian things are zodiacal. If the leighton is classified then the leighton is extant. If something is extant and not searing then it is classified. Blue things are extant. All searing, panamanian things are not extant. The leighton is not zodiacal.", "logic": "\nPanamanian(leighton)\nPanamanian(leighton) and Zodiacal(leighton) -> Searing(leighton)\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\nClassified(leighton) -> Extant(leighton)\nforall x (Extant(x) and not Searing(x) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Extant(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) and Panamanian(x) -> not Extant(x))\n\nnot Zodiacal(leighton)\n\nPanamanian(leighton) and forall x (Panamanian(x) -> Zodiacal(x)) -> therefore Zodiacal(leighton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The sheeree is eponymous. If the sheeree is eponymous and the sheeree is antitrust then the sheeree is geocentric. All eponymous things are antitrust. If the sheeree is soupy then the sheeree is aligned. If something is aligned and not geocentric then it is soupy. Blue things are aligned. All geocentric, eponymous things are not aligned. The sheeree is geocentric.", "logic": "\nEponymous(sheeree)\nEponymous(sheeree) and Antitrust(sheeree) -> Geocentric(sheeree)\nforall x (Eponymous(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nSoupy(sheeree) -> Aligned(sheeree)\nforall x (Aligned(x) and not Geocentric(x) -> Soupy(x))\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Geocentric(x) and Eponymous(x) -> not Aligned(x))\n\nGeocentric(sheeree)\n\nEponymous(sheeree) and forall x (Eponymous(x) -> Antitrust(x)) -> therefore Antitrust(sheeree) Eponymous(sheeree) and Antitrust(sheeree) and Eponymous(sheeree) and Antitrust(sheeree) -> Geocentric(sheeree) -> therefore Geocentric(sheeree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The shaughn is quaternary. If the shaughn is quaternary and the shaughn is numerical then the shaughn is calamitous. All quaternary things are numerical. If the shaughn is swept then the shaughn is repellent. If something is repellent and not calamitous then it is swept. Blue things are repellent. All calamitous, quaternary things are not repellent. The shaughn is not calamitous.", "logic": "\nQuaternary(shaughn)\nQuaternary(shaughn) and Numerical(shaughn) -> Calamitous(shaughn)\nforall x (Quaternary(x) -> Numerical(x))\nSwept(shaughn) -> Repellent(shaughn)\nforall x (Repellent(x) and not Calamitous(x) -> Swept(x))\nforall x (Swept(x) -> Repellent(x))\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Quaternary(x) -> not Repellent(x))\n\nnot Calamitous(shaughn)\n\nQuaternary(shaughn) and forall x (Quaternary(x) -> Numerical(x)) -> therefore Numerical(shaughn) Quaternary(shaughn) and Numerical(shaughn) and Quaternary(shaughn) and Numerical(shaughn) -> Calamitous(shaughn) -> therefore Calamitous(shaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The martina is vulcanised. If the martina is vulcanised and the martina is aurous then the martina is soupy. All vulcanised things are aurous. If the martina is deathless then the martina is thickset. If something is thickset and not soupy then it is deathless. Blue things are thickset. All soupy, vulcanised things are not thickset. The martina is not thickset.", "logic": "\nVulcanised(martina)\nVulcanised(martina) and Aurous(martina) -> Soupy(martina)\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Aurous(x))\nDeathless(martina) -> Thickset(martina)\nforall x (Thickset(x) and not Soupy(x) -> Deathless(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Thickset(x))\nforall x (Soupy(x) and Vulcanised(x) -> not Thickset(x))\n\nnot Thickset(martina)\n\nVulcanised(martina) and forall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Aurous(x)) -> therefore Aurous(martina) Vulcanised(martina) and Aurous(martina) and Vulcanised(martina) and Aurous(martina) -> Soupy(martina) -> therefore Soupy(martina) Soupy(martina) and Vulcanised(martina) and forall x (Soupy(x) and Vulcanised(x) -> not Thickset(x)) -> therefore not Thickset(martina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The irena is dogging. If the irena is dogging and the irena is sloping then the irena is planned. All dogging things are sloping. If the irena is misty then the irena is cyprian. If something is cyprian and not planned then it is misty. Blue things are cyprian. All planned, dogging things are not cyprian. The irena is cyprian.", "logic": "\nDogging(irena)\nDogging(irena) and Sloping(irena) -> Planned(irena)\nforall x (Dogging(x) -> Sloping(x))\nMisty(irena) -> Cyprian(irena)\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and not Planned(x) -> Misty(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) and Dogging(x) -> not Cyprian(x))\n\nCyprian(irena)\n\nDogging(irena) and forall x (Dogging(x) -> Sloping(x)) -> therefore Sloping(irena) Dogging(irena) and Sloping(irena) and Dogging(irena) and Sloping(irena) -> Planned(irena) -> therefore Planned(irena) Planned(irena) and Dogging(irena) and forall x (Planned(x) and Dogging(x) -> not Cyprian(x)) -> therefore not Cyprian(irena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The yard is snafu. If the yard is snafu and the yard is sleazy then the yard is dilute. All snafu things are sleazy. If the yard is sleek then the yard is shipboard. If something is shipboard and not dilute then it is sleek. Blue things are shipboard. All dilute, snafu things are not shipboard. The yard is not sleek.", "logic": "\nSnafu(yard)\nSnafu(yard) and Sleazy(yard) -> Dilute(yard)\nforall x (Snafu(x) -> Sleazy(x))\nSleek(yard) -> Shipboard(yard)\nforall x (Shipboard(x) and not Dilute(x) -> Sleek(x))\nforall x (Sleek(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Dilute(x) and Snafu(x) -> not Shipboard(x))\n\nnot Sleek(yard)\n\nforall x (Shipboard(x) and not Dilute(x) -> Sleek(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The susanna is olden. If the susanna is olden and the susanna is splotched then the susanna is fiendish. All olden things are splotched. If the susanna is nonracist then the susanna is humoral. If something is humoral and not fiendish then it is nonracist. Blue things are humoral. All fiendish, olden things are not humoral. The susanna chases the susanna.", "logic": "\nOlden(susanna)\nOlden(susanna) and Splotched(susanna) -> Fiendish(susanna)\nforall x (Olden(x) -> Splotched(x))\nNonracist(susanna) -> Humoral(susanna)\nforall x (Humoral(x) and not Fiendish(x) -> Nonracist(x))\nforall x (Nonracist(x) -> Humoral(x))\nforall x (Fiendish(x) and Olden(x) -> not Humoral(x))\n\nChases(susanna, susanna)\n\nChases(susanna, susanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The wilbur is untimely. If the wilbur is untimely and the wilbur is saute then the wilbur is natty. All untimely things are saute. If the wilbur is capricious then the wilbur is confutable. If something is confutable and not natty then it is capricious. Blue things are confutable. All natty, untimely things are not confutable. The wilbur does not visit the wilbur.", "logic": "\nUntimely(wilbur)\nUntimely(wilbur) and Saute(wilbur) -> Natty(wilbur)\nforall x (Untimely(x) -> Saute(x))\nCapricious(wilbur) -> Confutable(wilbur)\nforall x (Confutable(x) and not Natty(x) -> Capricious(x))\nforall x (Capricious(x) -> Confutable(x))\nforall x (Natty(x) and Untimely(x) -> not Confutable(x))\n\nnot Visits(wilbur, wilbur)\n\nnot Visits(wilbur, wilbur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The eloisa is quechuan. If the eloisa is quechuan and the eloisa is bacteremic then the eloisa is unkeyed. All quechuan things are bacteremic. If the eloisa is speckless then the eloisa is plowed. If something is plowed and not unkeyed then it is speckless. Blue things are plowed. All unkeyed, quechuan things are not plowed. The eloisa sees the eloisa.", "logic": "\nQuechuan(eloisa)\nQuechuan(eloisa) and Bacteremic(eloisa) -> Unkeyed(eloisa)\nforall x (Quechuan(x) -> Bacteremic(x))\nSpeckless(eloisa) -> Plowed(eloisa)\nforall x (Plowed(x) and not Unkeyed(x) -> Speckless(x))\nforall x (Speckless(x) -> Plowed(x))\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) and Quechuan(x) -> not Plowed(x))\n\nSees(eloisa, eloisa)\n\nSees(eloisa, eloisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "Saraann is blameless. Nichols is genetical. Nichols is charcoal. If Saraann is genetical then Saraann is charcoal. If someone is blameless then they are genetical. If someone is sadistic then they are apivorous. Red people are sadistic. All genetical people are sadistic. If someone is charcoal and apivorous then they are genetical. Nichols is genetical.", "logic": "\nBlameless(saraann)\nGenetical(nichols)\nCharcoal(nichols)\nGenetical(saraann) -> Charcoal(saraann)\nforall x (Blameless(x) -> Genetical(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> Apivorous(x))\nforall x (Edematous(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Genetical(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Charcoal(x) and Apivorous(x) -> Genetical(x))\n\nGenetical(nichols)\n\ntherefore Genetical(nichols)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Hilda is twentieth. Essa is sumerian. Essa is desirable. If Hilda is sumerian then Hilda is desirable. If someone is twentieth then they are sumerian. If someone is yelled then they are undressed. Red people are yelled. All sumerian people are yelled. If someone is desirable and undressed then they are sumerian. Hilda is not twentieth.", "logic": "\nTwentieth(hilda)\nSumerian(essa)\nDesirable(essa)\nSumerian(hilda) -> Desirable(hilda)\nforall x (Twentieth(x) -> Sumerian(x))\nforall x (Yelled(x) -> Undressed(x))\nforall x (Deadpan(x) -> Yelled(x))\nforall x (Sumerian(x) -> Yelled(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and Undressed(x) -> Sumerian(x))\n\nnot Twentieth(hilda)\n\ntherefore Twentieth(hilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Kelcie is indiscrete. Spud is castrated. Spud is squared. If Kelcie is castrated then Kelcie is squared. If someone is indiscrete then they are castrated. If someone is isotropic then they are consensual. Red people are isotropic. All castrated people are isotropic. If someone is squared and consensual then they are castrated. Kelcie is castrated.", "logic": "\nIndiscrete(kelcie)\nCastrated(spud)\nSquared(spud)\nCastrated(kelcie) -> Squared(kelcie)\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) -> Castrated(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) -> Consensual(x))\nforall x (Smoggy(x) -> Isotropic(x))\nforall x (Castrated(x) -> Isotropic(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) and Consensual(x) -> Castrated(x))\n\nCastrated(kelcie)\n\nIndiscrete(kelcie) and forall x (Indiscrete(x) -> Castrated(x)) -> therefore Castrated(kelcie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Giovanne is umteen. Sophi is caudal. Sophi is argive. If Giovanne is caudal then Giovanne is argive. If someone is umteen then they are caudal. If someone is custom then they are paintable. Red people are custom. All caudal people are custom. If someone is argive and paintable then they are caudal. Giovanne is not caudal.", "logic": "\nUmteen(giovanne)\nCaudal(sophi)\nArgive(sophi)\nCaudal(giovanne) -> Argive(giovanne)\nforall x (Umteen(x) -> Caudal(x))\nforall x (Custom(x) -> Paintable(x))\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Caudal(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Argive(x) and Paintable(x) -> Caudal(x))\n\nnot Caudal(giovanne)\n\nUmteen(giovanne) and forall x (Umteen(x) -> Caudal(x)) -> therefore Caudal(giovanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Celina is nonimmune. Win is written. Win is debonair. If Celina is written then Celina is debonair. If someone is nonimmune then they are written. If someone is bookish then they are sweptback. Red people are bookish. All written people are bookish. If someone is debonair and sweptback then they are written. Celina is bookish.", "logic": "\nNonimmune(celina)\nWritten(win)\nDebonair(win)\nWritten(celina) -> Debonair(celina)\nforall x (Nonimmune(x) -> Written(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) -> Sweptback(x))\nforall x (Licked(x) -> Bookish(x))\nforall x (Written(x) -> Bookish(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) and Sweptback(x) -> Written(x))\n\nBookish(celina)\n\nNonimmune(celina) and forall x (Nonimmune(x) -> Written(x)) -> therefore Written(celina) Written(celina) and forall x (Written(x) -> Bookish(x)) -> therefore Bookish(celina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Kristos is slaked. Johann is sticking. Johann is nestorian. If Kristos is sticking then Kristos is nestorian. If someone is slaked then they are sticking. If someone is pugnacious then they are isopteran. Red people are pugnacious. All sticking people are pugnacious. If someone is nestorian and isopteran then they are sticking. Johann is not isopteran.", "logic": "\nSlaked(kristos)\nSticking(johann)\nNestorian(johann)\nSticking(kristos) -> Nestorian(kristos)\nforall x (Slaked(x) -> Sticking(x))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) -> Isopteran(x))\nforall x (Wiggly(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\nforall x (Sticking(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) and Isopteran(x) -> Sticking(x))\n\nnot Isopteran(johann)\n\nSticking(johann) and forall x (Sticking(x) -> Pugnacious(x)) -> therefore Pugnacious(johann) Pugnacious(johann) and forall x (Pugnacious(x) -> Isopteran(x)) -> therefore Isopteran(johann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Catlin is antenatal. Perceval is ghanese. Perceval is delusional. If Catlin is ghanese then Catlin is delusional. If someone is antenatal then they are ghanese. If someone is jaunty then they are unkept. Red people are jaunty. All ghanese people are jaunty. If someone is delusional and unkept then they are ghanese. Catlin is unkept.", "logic": "\nAntenatal(catlin)\nGhanese(perceval)\nDelusional(perceval)\nGhanese(catlin) -> Delusional(catlin)\nforall x (Antenatal(x) -> Ghanese(x))\nforall x (Jaunty(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Improvised(x) -> Jaunty(x))\nforall x (Ghanese(x) -> Jaunty(x))\nforall x (Delusional(x) and Unkept(x) -> Ghanese(x))\n\nUnkept(catlin)\n\nAntenatal(catlin) and forall x (Antenatal(x) -> Ghanese(x)) -> therefore Ghanese(catlin) Ghanese(catlin) and forall x (Ghanese(x) -> Jaunty(x)) -> therefore Jaunty(catlin) Jaunty(catlin) and forall x (Jaunty(x) -> Unkept(x)) -> therefore Unkept(catlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Gilberto is ulcerous. Clerissa is awny. Clerissa is prolate. If Gilberto is awny then Gilberto is prolate. If someone is ulcerous then they are awny. If someone is morphemic then they are overheated. Red people are morphemic. All awny people are morphemic. If someone is prolate and overheated then they are awny. Gilberto is not overheated.", "logic": "\nUlcerous(gilberto)\nAwny(clerissa)\nProlate(clerissa)\nAwny(gilberto) -> Prolate(gilberto)\nforall x (Ulcerous(x) -> Awny(x))\nforall x (Morphemic(x) -> Overheated(x))\nforall x (Hired(x) -> Morphemic(x))\nforall x (Awny(x) -> Morphemic(x))\nforall x (Prolate(x) and Overheated(x) -> Awny(x))\n\nnot Overheated(gilberto)\n\nUlcerous(gilberto) and forall x (Ulcerous(x) -> Awny(x)) -> therefore Awny(gilberto) Awny(gilberto) and forall x (Awny(x) -> Morphemic(x)) -> therefore Morphemic(gilberto) Morphemic(gilberto) and forall x (Morphemic(x) -> Overheated(x)) -> therefore Overheated(gilberto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Maddalena is pelvic. Sabra is nauseous. Sabra is tough. If Maddalena is nauseous then Maddalena is tough. If someone is pelvic then they are nauseous. If someone is cheering then they are midmost. Red people are cheering. All nauseous people are cheering. If someone is tough and midmost then they are nauseous. Sabra is not immutable.", "logic": "\nPelvic(maddalena)\nNauseous(sabra)\nTough(sabra)\nNauseous(maddalena) -> Tough(maddalena)\nforall x (Pelvic(x) -> Nauseous(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Cheering(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Cheering(x))\nforall x (Tough(x) and Midmost(x) -> Nauseous(x))\n\nnot Immutable(sabra)\n\nnot Immutable(sabra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Mary is laputan. Zebedee is threadbare. Zebedee is kampuchean. If Mary is threadbare then Mary is kampuchean. If someone is laputan then they are threadbare. If someone is anorexic then they are spavined. Red people are anorexic. All threadbare people are anorexic. If someone is kampuchean and spavined then they are threadbare. Zebedee is quiet.", "logic": "\nLaputan(mary)\nThreadbare(zebedee)\nKampuchean(zebedee)\nThreadbare(mary) -> Kampuchean(mary)\nforall x (Laputan(x) -> Threadbare(x))\nforall x (Anorexic(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Menial(x) -> Anorexic(x))\nforall x (Threadbare(x) -> Anorexic(x))\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) and Spavined(x) -> Threadbare(x))\n\nQuiet(zebedee)\n\nQuiet(zebedee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Janelle is marbleized. Wendy is babylonian. Wendy is prussian. If Janelle is babylonian then Janelle is prussian. If someone is marbleized then they are babylonian. If someone is mesial then they are uncousinly. Red people are mesial. All babylonian people are mesial. If someone is prussian and uncousinly then they are babylonian. Janelle is not quiet.", "logic": "\nMarbleized(janelle)\nBabylonian(wendy)\nPrussian(wendy)\nBabylonian(janelle) -> Prussian(janelle)\nforall x (Marbleized(x) -> Babylonian(x))\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\nforall x (Centric(x) -> Mesial(x))\nforall x (Babylonian(x) -> Mesial(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) and Uncousinly(x) -> Babylonian(x))\n\nnot Quiet(janelle)\n\nnot Quiet(janelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Nancie is campy. Lavinia is aghast. Lavinia is blase. If Nancie is aghast then Nancie is blase. If someone is campy then they are aghast. If someone is honourable then they are hagridden. Red people are honourable. All aghast people are honourable. If someone is blase and hagridden then they are aghast. Lavinia is campy.", "logic": "\nCampy(nancie)\nAghast(lavinia)\nBlase(lavinia)\nAghast(nancie) -> Blase(nancie)\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Honourable(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nforall x (Pennate(x) -> Honourable(x))\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Honourable(x))\nforall x (Blase(x) and Hagridden(x) -> Aghast(x))\n\nCampy(lavinia)\n\nCampy(lavinia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The blair dissuade the daren. The blair does not chase the bidget. The blair is ravaged. The blair is dextrorsal. The blair floor the daren. The blair does not like the bidget. The blair floor the lindi. The blair inseminate the lindi. The daren is glomerular. The daren floor the blair. The daren floor the lindi. The daren inseminate the lindi. The bidget dissuade the daren. The bidget does not need the blair. The lindi floor the bidget. If the blair is dextrorsal then the blair dissuade the lindi. If something dissuade the lindi then the lindi inseminate the blair. If the lindi inseminate the blair and the blair floor the daren then the daren inseminate the blair. If something inseminate the bidget and the bidget is authorial then the bidget inseminate the daren. If something inseminate the lindi and it does not need the daren then the lindi is not ravaged. If something is dextrorsal and not ravaged then it is glomerular. If the bidget is not glomerular then the bidget is not corinthian. If the daren is glomerular and the daren dissuade the bidget then the bidget is corinthian. The blair is dextrorsal.", "logic": "\nDissuade(blair, daren)\nnot Dissuade(blair, bidget)\nRavaged(blair)\nDextrorsal(blair)\nFloor(blair, daren)\nnot Floor(blair, bidget)\nFloor(blair, lindi)\nInseminate(blair, lindi)\nGlomerular(daren)\nFloor(daren, blair)\nFloor(daren, lindi)\nInseminate(daren, lindi)\nDissuade(bidget, daren)\nnot Inseminate(bidget, blair)\nFloor(lindi, bidget)\nDextrorsal(blair) -> Dissuade(blair, lindi)\nforall x (Dissuade(x, lindi) -> Inseminate(lindi, blair))\nInseminate(lindi, blair) and Floor(blair, daren) -> Inseminate(daren, blair)\nforall x (Inseminate(x, bidget) and Authorial(bidget) -> Inseminate(bidget, daren))\nforall x (Inseminate(x, lindi) and not Inseminate(x, daren) -> not Ravaged(lindi))\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) and not Ravaged(x) -> Glomerular(x))\nnot Glomerular(bidget) -> not Corinthian(bidget)\nGlomerular(daren) and Dissuade(daren, bidget) -> Corinthian(bidget)\n\nDextrorsal(blair)\n\ntherefore Dextrorsal(blair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The riki reanimate the maegan. The riki does not chase the sheela. The riki is staccato. The riki is different. The riki cord the maegan. The riki does not like the sheela. The riki cord the witty. The riki plunder the witty. The maegan is spartan. The maegan cord the riki. The maegan cord the witty. The maegan plunder the witty. The sheela reanimate the maegan. The sheela does not need the riki. The witty cord the sheela. If the riki is different then the riki reanimate the witty. If something reanimate the witty then the witty plunder the riki. If the witty plunder the riki and the riki cord the maegan then the maegan plunder the riki. If something plunder the sheela and the sheela is bifurcated then the sheela plunder the maegan. If something plunder the witty and it does not need the maegan then the witty is not staccato. If something is different and not staccato then it is spartan. If the sheela is not spartan then the sheela is not archean. If the maegan is spartan and the maegan reanimate the sheela then the sheela is archean. The sheela plunder the riki.", "logic": "\nReanimate(riki, maegan)\nnot Reanimate(riki, sheela)\nStaccato(riki)\nDifferent(riki)\nCord(riki, maegan)\nnot Cord(riki, sheela)\nCord(riki, witty)\nPlunder(riki, witty)\nSpartan(maegan)\nCord(maegan, riki)\nCord(maegan, witty)\nPlunder(maegan, witty)\nReanimate(sheela, maegan)\nnot Plunder(sheela, riki)\nCord(witty, sheela)\nDifferent(riki) -> Reanimate(riki, witty)\nforall x (Reanimate(x, witty) -> Plunder(witty, riki))\nPlunder(witty, riki) and Cord(riki, maegan) -> Plunder(maegan, riki)\nforall x (Plunder(x, sheela) and Bifurcated(sheela) -> Plunder(sheela, maegan))\nforall x (Plunder(x, witty) and not Plunder(x, maegan) -> not Staccato(witty))\nforall x (Different(x) and not Staccato(x) -> Spartan(x))\nnot Spartan(sheela) -> not Archean(sheela)\nSpartan(maegan) and Reanimate(maegan, sheela) -> Archean(sheela)\n\nPlunder(sheela, riki)\n\ntherefore not Plunder(sheela, riki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The nathalie drench the durward. The nathalie does not chase the kristien. The nathalie is irregular. The nathalie is opaque. The nathalie terrorise the durward. The nathalie does not like the kristien. The nathalie terrorise the mohamed. The nathalie overdraw the mohamed. The durward is achromous. The durward terrorise the nathalie. The durward terrorise the mohamed. The durward overdraw the mohamed. The kristien drench the durward. The kristien does not need the nathalie. The mohamed terrorise the kristien. If the nathalie is opaque then the nathalie drench the mohamed. If something drench the mohamed then the mohamed overdraw the nathalie. If the mohamed overdraw the nathalie and the nathalie terrorise the durward then the durward overdraw the nathalie. If something overdraw the kristien and the kristien is memorable then the kristien overdraw the durward. If something overdraw the mohamed and it does not need the durward then the mohamed is not irregular. If something is opaque and not irregular then it is achromous. If the kristien is not achromous then the kristien is not skanky. If the durward is achromous and the durward drench the kristien then the kristien is skanky. The nathalie drench the mohamed.", "logic": "\nDrench(nathalie, durward)\nnot Drench(nathalie, kristien)\nIrregular(nathalie)\nOpaque(nathalie)\nTerrorise(nathalie, durward)\nnot Terrorise(nathalie, kristien)\nTerrorise(nathalie, mohamed)\nOverdraw(nathalie, mohamed)\nAchromous(durward)\nTerrorise(durward, nathalie)\nTerrorise(durward, mohamed)\nOverdraw(durward, mohamed)\nDrench(kristien, durward)\nnot Overdraw(kristien, nathalie)\nTerrorise(mohamed, kristien)\nOpaque(nathalie) -> Drench(nathalie, mohamed)\nforall x (Drench(x, mohamed) -> Overdraw(mohamed, nathalie))\nOverdraw(mohamed, nathalie) and Terrorise(nathalie, durward) -> Overdraw(durward, nathalie)\nforall x (Overdraw(x, kristien) and Memorable(kristien) -> Overdraw(kristien, durward))\nforall x (Overdraw(x, mohamed) and not Overdraw(x, durward) -> not Irregular(mohamed))\nforall x (Opaque(x) and not Irregular(x) -> Achromous(x))\nnot Achromous(kristien) -> not Skanky(kristien)\nAchromous(durward) and Drench(durward, kristien) -> Skanky(kristien)\n\nDrench(nathalie, mohamed)\n\nOpaque(nathalie) and Opaque(nathalie) -> Drench(nathalie, mohamed) -> therefore Drench(nathalie, mohamed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The herman hook the cathrine. The herman does not chase the patric. The herman is sinusoidal. The herman is squeamish. The herman entangle the cathrine. The herman does not like the patric. The herman entangle the gunther. The herman ambulate the gunther. The cathrine is lancinate. The cathrine entangle the herman. The cathrine entangle the gunther. The cathrine ambulate the gunther. The patric hook the cathrine. The patric does not need the herman. The gunther entangle the patric. If the herman is squeamish then the herman hook the gunther. If something hook the gunther then the gunther ambulate the herman. If the gunther ambulate the herman and the herman entangle the cathrine then the cathrine ambulate the herman. If something ambulate the patric and the patric is hebridean then the patric ambulate the cathrine. If something ambulate the gunther and it does not need the cathrine then the gunther is not sinusoidal. If something is squeamish and not sinusoidal then it is lancinate. If the patric is not lancinate then the patric is not underslung. If the cathrine is lancinate and the cathrine hook the patric then the patric is underslung. The herman does not chase the gunther.", "logic": "\nHook(herman, cathrine)\nnot Hook(herman, patric)\nSinusoidal(herman)\nSqueamish(herman)\nEntangle(herman, cathrine)\nnot Entangle(herman, patric)\nEntangle(herman, gunther)\nAmbulate(herman, gunther)\nLancinate(cathrine)\nEntangle(cathrine, herman)\nEntangle(cathrine, gunther)\nAmbulate(cathrine, gunther)\nHook(patric, cathrine)\nnot Ambulate(patric, herman)\nEntangle(gunther, patric)\nSqueamish(herman) -> Hook(herman, gunther)\nforall x (Hook(x, gunther) -> Ambulate(gunther, herman))\nAmbulate(gunther, herman) and Entangle(herman, cathrine) -> Ambulate(cathrine, herman)\nforall x (Ambulate(x, patric) and Hebridean(patric) -> Ambulate(patric, cathrine))\nforall x (Ambulate(x, gunther) and not Ambulate(x, cathrine) -> not Sinusoidal(gunther))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) and not Sinusoidal(x) -> Lancinate(x))\nnot Lancinate(patric) -> not Underslung(patric)\nLancinate(cathrine) and Hook(cathrine, patric) -> Underslung(patric)\n\nnot Hook(herman, gunther)\n\nSqueamish(herman) and Squeamish(herman) -> Hook(herman, gunther) -> therefore Hook(herman, gunther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The linnie expect the carilyn. The linnie does not chase the leoine. The linnie is pyknic. The linnie is iridescent. The linnie neutralise the carilyn. The linnie does not like the leoine. The linnie neutralise the mirella. The linnie reactivate the mirella. The carilyn is herbaceous. The carilyn neutralise the linnie. The carilyn neutralise the mirella. The carilyn reactivate the mirella. The leoine expect the carilyn. The leoine does not need the linnie. The mirella neutralise the leoine. If the linnie is iridescent then the linnie expect the mirella. If something expect the mirella then the mirella reactivate the linnie. If the mirella reactivate the linnie and the linnie neutralise the carilyn then the carilyn reactivate the linnie. If something reactivate the leoine and the leoine is petalless then the leoine reactivate the carilyn. If something reactivate the mirella and it does not need the carilyn then the mirella is not pyknic. If something is iridescent and not pyknic then it is herbaceous. If the leoine is not herbaceous then the leoine is not socialised. If the carilyn is herbaceous and the carilyn expect the leoine then the leoine is socialised. The mirella reactivate the linnie.", "logic": "\nExpect(linnie, carilyn)\nnot Expect(linnie, leoine)\nPyknic(linnie)\nIridescent(linnie)\nNeutralise(linnie, carilyn)\nnot Neutralise(linnie, leoine)\nNeutralise(linnie, mirella)\nReactivate(linnie, mirella)\nHerbaceous(carilyn)\nNeutralise(carilyn, linnie)\nNeutralise(carilyn, mirella)\nReactivate(carilyn, mirella)\nExpect(leoine, carilyn)\nnot Reactivate(leoine, linnie)\nNeutralise(mirella, leoine)\nIridescent(linnie) -> Expect(linnie, mirella)\nforall x (Expect(x, mirella) -> Reactivate(mirella, linnie))\nReactivate(mirella, linnie) and Neutralise(linnie, carilyn) -> Reactivate(carilyn, linnie)\nforall x (Reactivate(x, leoine) and Petalless(leoine) -> Reactivate(leoine, carilyn))\nforall x (Reactivate(x, mirella) and not Reactivate(x, carilyn) -> not Pyknic(mirella))\nforall x (Iridescent(x) and not Pyknic(x) -> Herbaceous(x))\nnot Herbaceous(leoine) -> not Socialised(leoine)\nHerbaceous(carilyn) and Expect(carilyn, leoine) -> Socialised(leoine)\n\nReactivate(mirella, linnie)\n\nIridescent(linnie) and Iridescent(linnie) -> Expect(linnie, mirella) -> therefore Expect(linnie, mirella) Expect(linnie, mirella) and forall x (Expect(x, mirella) -> Reactivate(mirella, linnie)) -> therefore Reactivate(mirella, linnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The tabitha gravitate the dexter. The tabitha does not chase the arden. The tabitha is centennial. The tabitha is bountied. The tabitha pickle the dexter. The tabitha does not like the arden. The tabitha pickle the jaquelyn. The tabitha feint the jaquelyn. The dexter is academic. The dexter pickle the tabitha. The dexter pickle the jaquelyn. The dexter feint the jaquelyn. The arden gravitate the dexter. The arden does not need the tabitha. The jaquelyn pickle the arden. If the tabitha is bountied then the tabitha gravitate the jaquelyn. If something gravitate the jaquelyn then the jaquelyn feint the tabitha. If the jaquelyn feint the tabitha and the tabitha pickle the dexter then the dexter feint the tabitha. If something feint the arden and the arden is rickety then the arden feint the dexter. If something feint the jaquelyn and it does not need the dexter then the jaquelyn is not centennial. If something is bountied and not centennial then it is academic. If the arden is not academic then the arden is not copious. If the dexter is academic and the dexter gravitate the arden then the arden is copious. The jaquelyn does not need the tabitha.", "logic": "\nGravitate(tabitha, dexter)\nnot Gravitate(tabitha, arden)\nCentennial(tabitha)\nBountied(tabitha)\nPickle(tabitha, dexter)\nnot Pickle(tabitha, arden)\nPickle(tabitha, jaquelyn)\nFeint(tabitha, jaquelyn)\nAcademic(dexter)\nPickle(dexter, tabitha)\nPickle(dexter, jaquelyn)\nFeint(dexter, jaquelyn)\nGravitate(arden, dexter)\nnot Feint(arden, tabitha)\nPickle(jaquelyn, arden)\nBountied(tabitha) -> Gravitate(tabitha, jaquelyn)\nforall x (Gravitate(x, jaquelyn) -> Feint(jaquelyn, tabitha))\nFeint(jaquelyn, tabitha) and Pickle(tabitha, dexter) -> Feint(dexter, tabitha)\nforall x (Feint(x, arden) and Rickety(arden) -> Feint(arden, dexter))\nforall x (Feint(x, jaquelyn) and not Feint(x, dexter) -> not Centennial(jaquelyn))\nforall x (Bountied(x) and not Centennial(x) -> Academic(x))\nnot Academic(arden) -> not Copious(arden)\nAcademic(dexter) and Gravitate(dexter, arden) -> Copious(arden)\n\nnot Feint(jaquelyn, tabitha)\n\nBountied(tabitha) and Bountied(tabitha) -> Gravitate(tabitha, jaquelyn) -> therefore Gravitate(tabitha, jaquelyn) Gravitate(tabitha, jaquelyn) and forall x (Gravitate(x, jaquelyn) -> Feint(jaquelyn, tabitha)) -> therefore Feint(jaquelyn, tabitha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The ernesto scrag the masha. The ernesto does not chase the charity. The ernesto is dumfounded. The ernesto is unpotted. The ernesto pulp the masha. The ernesto does not like the charity. The ernesto pulp the cati. The ernesto purchase the cati. The masha is disgustful. The masha pulp the ernesto. The masha pulp the cati. The masha purchase the cati. The charity scrag the masha. The charity does not need the ernesto. The cati pulp the charity. If the ernesto is unpotted then the ernesto scrag the cati. If something scrag the cati then the cati purchase the ernesto. If the cati purchase the ernesto and the ernesto pulp the masha then the masha purchase the ernesto. If something purchase the charity and the charity is tentacular then the charity purchase the masha. If something purchase the cati and it does not need the masha then the cati is not dumfounded. If something is unpotted and not dumfounded then it is disgustful. If the charity is not disgustful then the charity is not rubber. If the masha is disgustful and the masha scrag the charity then the charity is rubber. The masha purchase the ernesto.", "logic": "\nScrag(ernesto, masha)\nnot Scrag(ernesto, charity)\nDumfounded(ernesto)\nUnpotted(ernesto)\nPulp(ernesto, masha)\nnot Pulp(ernesto, charity)\nPulp(ernesto, cati)\nPurchase(ernesto, cati)\nDisgustful(masha)\nPulp(masha, ernesto)\nPulp(masha, cati)\nPurchase(masha, cati)\nScrag(charity, masha)\nnot Purchase(charity, ernesto)\nPulp(cati, charity)\nUnpotted(ernesto) -> Scrag(ernesto, cati)\nforall x (Scrag(x, cati) -> Purchase(cati, ernesto))\nPurchase(cati, ernesto) and Pulp(ernesto, masha) -> Purchase(masha, ernesto)\nforall x (Purchase(x, charity) and Tentacular(charity) -> Purchase(charity, masha))\nforall x (Purchase(x, cati) and not Purchase(x, masha) -> not Dumfounded(cati))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) and not Dumfounded(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nnot Disgustful(charity) -> not Rubber(charity)\nDisgustful(masha) and Scrag(masha, charity) -> Rubber(charity)\n\nPurchase(masha, ernesto)\n\nUnpotted(ernesto) and Unpotted(ernesto) -> Scrag(ernesto, cati) -> therefore Scrag(ernesto, cati) Scrag(ernesto, cati) and forall x (Scrag(x, cati) -> Purchase(cati, ernesto)) -> therefore Purchase(cati, ernesto) Purchase(cati, ernesto) and Pulp(ernesto, masha) and Purchase(cati, ernesto) and Pulp(ernesto, masha) -> Purchase(masha, ernesto) -> therefore Purchase(masha, ernesto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The cody ambush the olivier. The cody does not chase the ophelie. The cody is ungraceful. The cody is australian. The cody grouch the olivier. The cody does not like the ophelie. The cody grouch the sheffy. The cody obfuscate the sheffy. The olivier is upended. The olivier grouch the cody. The olivier grouch the sheffy. The olivier obfuscate the sheffy. The ophelie ambush the olivier. The ophelie does not need the cody. The sheffy grouch the ophelie. If the cody is australian then the cody ambush the sheffy. If something ambush the sheffy then the sheffy obfuscate the cody. If the sheffy obfuscate the cody and the cody grouch the olivier then the olivier obfuscate the cody. If something obfuscate the ophelie and the ophelie is lumbar then the ophelie obfuscate the olivier. If something obfuscate the sheffy and it does not need the olivier then the sheffy is not ungraceful. If something is australian and not ungraceful then it is upended. If the ophelie is not upended then the ophelie is not sagittal. If the olivier is upended and the olivier ambush the ophelie then the ophelie is sagittal. The olivier does not need the cody.", "logic": "\nAmbush(cody, olivier)\nnot Ambush(cody, ophelie)\nUngraceful(cody)\nAustralian(cody)\nGrouch(cody, olivier)\nnot Grouch(cody, ophelie)\nGrouch(cody, sheffy)\nObfuscate(cody, sheffy)\nUpended(olivier)\nGrouch(olivier, cody)\nGrouch(olivier, sheffy)\nObfuscate(olivier, sheffy)\nAmbush(ophelie, olivier)\nnot Obfuscate(ophelie, cody)\nGrouch(sheffy, ophelie)\nAustralian(cody) -> Ambush(cody, sheffy)\nforall x (Ambush(x, sheffy) -> Obfuscate(sheffy, cody))\nObfuscate(sheffy, cody) and Grouch(cody, olivier) -> Obfuscate(olivier, cody)\nforall x (Obfuscate(x, ophelie) and Lumbar(ophelie) -> Obfuscate(ophelie, olivier))\nforall x (Obfuscate(x, sheffy) and not Obfuscate(x, olivier) -> not Ungraceful(sheffy))\nforall x (Australian(x) and not Ungraceful(x) -> Upended(x))\nnot Upended(ophelie) -> not Sagittal(ophelie)\nUpended(olivier) and Ambush(olivier, ophelie) -> Sagittal(ophelie)\n\nnot Obfuscate(olivier, cody)\n\nAustralian(cody) and Australian(cody) -> Ambush(cody, sheffy) -> therefore Ambush(cody, sheffy) Ambush(cody, sheffy) and forall x (Ambush(x, sheffy) -> Obfuscate(sheffy, cody)) -> therefore Obfuscate(sheffy, cody) Obfuscate(sheffy, cody) and Grouch(cody, olivier) and Obfuscate(sheffy, cody) and Grouch(cody, olivier) -> Obfuscate(olivier, cody) -> therefore Obfuscate(olivier, cody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The byram hygienise the sacha. The byram does not chase the judah. The byram is british. The byram is orchestral. The byram hearken the sacha. The byram does not like the judah. The byram hearken the frederick. The byram reorganise the frederick. The sacha is palpatory. The sacha hearken the byram. The sacha hearken the frederick. The sacha reorganise the frederick. The judah hygienise the sacha. The judah does not need the byram. The frederick hearken the judah. If the byram is orchestral then the byram hygienise the frederick. If something hygienise the frederick then the frederick reorganise the byram. If the frederick reorganise the byram and the byram hearken the sacha then the sacha reorganise the byram. If something reorganise the judah and the judah is strung then the judah reorganise the sacha. If something reorganise the frederick and it does not need the sacha then the frederick is not british. If something is orchestral and not british then it is palpatory. If the judah is not palpatory then the judah is not uncoiled. If the sacha is palpatory and the sacha hygienise the judah then the judah is uncoiled. The judah is not palpatory.", "logic": "\nHygienise(byram, sacha)\nnot Hygienise(byram, judah)\nBritish(byram)\nOrchestral(byram)\nHearken(byram, sacha)\nnot Hearken(byram, judah)\nHearken(byram, frederick)\nReorganise(byram, frederick)\nPalpatory(sacha)\nHearken(sacha, byram)\nHearken(sacha, frederick)\nReorganise(sacha, frederick)\nHygienise(judah, sacha)\nnot Reorganise(judah, byram)\nHearken(frederick, judah)\nOrchestral(byram) -> Hygienise(byram, frederick)\nforall x (Hygienise(x, frederick) -> Reorganise(frederick, byram))\nReorganise(frederick, byram) and Hearken(byram, sacha) -> Reorganise(sacha, byram)\nforall x (Reorganise(x, judah) and Strung(judah) -> Reorganise(judah, sacha))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, frederick) and not Reorganise(x, sacha) -> not British(frederick))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and not British(x) -> Palpatory(x))\nnot Palpatory(judah) -> not Uncoiled(judah)\nPalpatory(sacha) and Hygienise(sacha, judah) -> Uncoiled(judah)\n\nnot Palpatory(judah)\n\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and not British(x) -> Palpatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The lenna reassert the ichabod. The lenna does not chase the rupert. The lenna is testaceous. The lenna is impetuous. The lenna braze the ichabod. The lenna does not like the rupert. The lenna braze the immanuel. The lenna exorcise the immanuel. The ichabod is congested. The ichabod braze the lenna. The ichabod braze the immanuel. The ichabod exorcise the immanuel. The rupert reassert the ichabod. The rupert does not need the lenna. The immanuel braze the rupert. If the lenna is impetuous then the lenna reassert the immanuel. If something reassert the immanuel then the immanuel exorcise the lenna. If the immanuel exorcise the lenna and the lenna braze the ichabod then the ichabod exorcise the lenna. If something exorcise the rupert and the rupert is calibrated then the rupert exorcise the ichabod. If something exorcise the immanuel and it does not need the ichabod then the immanuel is not testaceous. If something is impetuous and not testaceous then it is congested. If the rupert is not congested then the rupert is not pendant. If the ichabod is congested and the ichabod reassert the rupert then the rupert is pendant. The lenna is congested.", "logic": "\nReassert(lenna, ichabod)\nnot Reassert(lenna, rupert)\nTestaceous(lenna)\nImpetuous(lenna)\nBraze(lenna, ichabod)\nnot Braze(lenna, rupert)\nBraze(lenna, immanuel)\nExorcise(lenna, immanuel)\nCongested(ichabod)\nBraze(ichabod, lenna)\nBraze(ichabod, immanuel)\nExorcise(ichabod, immanuel)\nReassert(rupert, ichabod)\nnot Exorcise(rupert, lenna)\nBraze(immanuel, rupert)\nImpetuous(lenna) -> Reassert(lenna, immanuel)\nforall x (Reassert(x, immanuel) -> Exorcise(immanuel, lenna))\nExorcise(immanuel, lenna) and Braze(lenna, ichabod) -> Exorcise(ichabod, lenna)\nforall x (Exorcise(x, rupert) and Calibrated(rupert) -> Exorcise(rupert, ichabod))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, immanuel) and not Exorcise(x, ichabod) -> not Testaceous(immanuel))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and not Testaceous(x) -> Congested(x))\nnot Congested(rupert) -> not Pendant(rupert)\nCongested(ichabod) and Reassert(ichabod, rupert) -> Pendant(rupert)\n\nCongested(lenna)\n\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and not Testaceous(x) -> Congested(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The giacinta exenterate the olympia. The giacinta does not chase the monty. The giacinta is decumbent. The giacinta is homesick. The giacinta crook the olympia. The giacinta does not like the monty. The giacinta crook the herman. The giacinta candy the herman. The olympia is nonlinear. The olympia crook the giacinta. The olympia crook the herman. The olympia candy the herman. The monty exenterate the olympia. The monty does not need the giacinta. The herman crook the monty. If the giacinta is homesick then the giacinta exenterate the herman. If something exenterate the herman then the herman candy the giacinta. If the herman candy the giacinta and the giacinta crook the olympia then the olympia candy the giacinta. If something candy the monty and the monty is cleanable then the monty candy the olympia. If something candy the herman and it does not need the olympia then the herman is not decumbent. If something is homesick and not decumbent then it is nonlinear. If the monty is not nonlinear then the monty is not norse. If the olympia is nonlinear and the olympia exenterate the monty then the monty is norse. The herman is not nonlinear.", "logic": "\nExenterate(giacinta, olympia)\nnot Exenterate(giacinta, monty)\nDecumbent(giacinta)\nHomesick(giacinta)\nCrook(giacinta, olympia)\nnot Crook(giacinta, monty)\nCrook(giacinta, herman)\nCandy(giacinta, herman)\nNonlinear(olympia)\nCrook(olympia, giacinta)\nCrook(olympia, herman)\nCandy(olympia, herman)\nExenterate(monty, olympia)\nnot Candy(monty, giacinta)\nCrook(herman, monty)\nHomesick(giacinta) -> Exenterate(giacinta, herman)\nforall x (Exenterate(x, herman) -> Candy(herman, giacinta))\nCandy(herman, giacinta) and Crook(giacinta, olympia) -> Candy(olympia, giacinta)\nforall x (Candy(x, monty) and Cleanable(monty) -> Candy(monty, olympia))\nforall x (Candy(x, herman) and not Candy(x, olympia) -> not Decumbent(herman))\nforall x (Homesick(x) and not Decumbent(x) -> Nonlinear(x))\nnot Nonlinear(monty) -> not Norse(monty)\nNonlinear(olympia) and Exenterate(olympia, monty) -> Norse(monty)\n\nnot Nonlinear(herman)\n\nforall x (Homesick(x) and not Decumbent(x) -> Nonlinear(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The claribel profess the callie. The claribel does not chase the crista. The claribel is uncarpeted. The claribel is jelled. The claribel number the callie. The claribel does not like the crista. The claribel number the moss. The claribel anger the moss. The callie is eremitic. The callie number the claribel. The callie number the moss. The callie anger the moss. The crista profess the callie. The crista does not need the claribel. The moss number the crista. If the claribel is jelled then the claribel profess the moss. If something profess the moss then the moss anger the claribel. If the moss anger the claribel and the claribel number the callie then the callie anger the claribel. If something anger the crista and the crista is torrid then the crista anger the callie. If something anger the moss and it does not need the callie then the moss is not uncarpeted. If something is jelled and not uncarpeted then it is eremitic. If the crista is not eremitic then the crista is not symphonic. If the callie is eremitic and the callie profess the crista then the crista is symphonic. The crista is symphonic.", "logic": "\nProfess(claribel, callie)\nnot Profess(claribel, crista)\nUncarpeted(claribel)\nJelled(claribel)\nNumber(claribel, callie)\nnot Number(claribel, crista)\nNumber(claribel, moss)\nAnger(claribel, moss)\nEremitic(callie)\nNumber(callie, claribel)\nNumber(callie, moss)\nAnger(callie, moss)\nProfess(crista, callie)\nnot Anger(crista, claribel)\nNumber(moss, crista)\nJelled(claribel) -> Profess(claribel, moss)\nforall x (Profess(x, moss) -> Anger(moss, claribel))\nAnger(moss, claribel) and Number(claribel, callie) -> Anger(callie, claribel)\nforall x (Anger(x, crista) and Torrid(crista) -> Anger(crista, callie))\nforall x (Anger(x, moss) and not Anger(x, callie) -> not Uncarpeted(moss))\nforall x (Jelled(x) and not Uncarpeted(x) -> Eremitic(x))\nnot Eremitic(crista) -> not Symphonic(crista)\nEremitic(callie) and Profess(callie, crista) -> Symphonic(crista)\n\nSymphonic(crista)\n\nEremitic(callie) and Profess(callie, crista) -> Symphonic(crista) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The matthiew twist the gera. The matthiew does not chase the glenda. The matthiew is tractive. The matthiew is smoggy. The matthiew scavenge the gera. The matthiew does not like the glenda. The matthiew scavenge the allyce. The matthiew heed the allyce. The gera is holey. The gera scavenge the matthiew. The gera scavenge the allyce. The gera heed the allyce. The glenda twist the gera. The glenda does not need the matthiew. The allyce scavenge the glenda. If the matthiew is smoggy then the matthiew twist the allyce. If something twist the allyce then the allyce heed the matthiew. If the allyce heed the matthiew and the matthiew scavenge the gera then the gera heed the matthiew. If something heed the glenda and the glenda is unattired then the glenda heed the gera. If something heed the allyce and it does not need the gera then the allyce is not tractive. If something is smoggy and not tractive then it is holey. If the glenda is not holey then the glenda is not hominid. If the gera is holey and the gera twist the glenda then the glenda is hominid. The allyce does not need the allyce.", "logic": "\nTwist(matthiew, gera)\nnot Twist(matthiew, glenda)\nTractive(matthiew)\nSmoggy(matthiew)\nScavenge(matthiew, gera)\nnot Scavenge(matthiew, glenda)\nScavenge(matthiew, allyce)\nHeed(matthiew, allyce)\nHoley(gera)\nScavenge(gera, matthiew)\nScavenge(gera, allyce)\nHeed(gera, allyce)\nTwist(glenda, gera)\nnot Heed(glenda, matthiew)\nScavenge(allyce, glenda)\nSmoggy(matthiew) -> Twist(matthiew, allyce)\nforall x (Twist(x, allyce) -> Heed(allyce, matthiew))\nHeed(allyce, matthiew) and Scavenge(matthiew, gera) -> Heed(gera, matthiew)\nforall x (Heed(x, glenda) and Unattired(glenda) -> Heed(glenda, gera))\nforall x (Heed(x, allyce) and not Heed(x, gera) -> not Tractive(allyce))\nforall x (Smoggy(x) and not Tractive(x) -> Holey(x))\nnot Holey(glenda) -> not Hominid(glenda)\nHoley(gera) and Twist(gera, glenda) -> Hominid(glenda)\n\nnot Heed(allyce, allyce)\n\nnot Heed(allyce, allyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The jae handicap the katie. The jae does not chase the quiggly. The jae is unrefined. The jae is macho. The jae calm the katie. The jae does not like the quiggly. The jae calm the jolee. The jae unsex the jolee. The katie is cheap. The katie calm the jae. The katie calm the jolee. The katie unsex the jolee. The quiggly handicap the katie. The quiggly does not need the jae. The jolee calm the quiggly. If the jae is macho then the jae handicap the jolee. If something handicap the jolee then the jolee unsex the jae. If the jolee unsex the jae and the jae calm the katie then the katie unsex the jae. If something unsex the quiggly and the quiggly is saved then the quiggly unsex the katie. If something unsex the jolee and it does not need the katie then the jolee is not unrefined. If something is macho and not unrefined then it is cheap. If the quiggly is not cheap then the quiggly is not accented. If the katie is cheap and the katie handicap the quiggly then the quiggly is accented. The jae calm the jae.", "logic": "\nHandicap(jae, katie)\nnot Handicap(jae, quiggly)\nUnrefined(jae)\nMacho(jae)\nCalm(jae, katie)\nnot Calm(jae, quiggly)\nCalm(jae, jolee)\nUnsex(jae, jolee)\nCheap(katie)\nCalm(katie, jae)\nCalm(katie, jolee)\nUnsex(katie, jolee)\nHandicap(quiggly, katie)\nnot Unsex(quiggly, jae)\nCalm(jolee, quiggly)\nMacho(jae) -> Handicap(jae, jolee)\nforall x (Handicap(x, jolee) -> Unsex(jolee, jae))\nUnsex(jolee, jae) and Calm(jae, katie) -> Unsex(katie, jae)\nforall x (Unsex(x, quiggly) and Saved(quiggly) -> Unsex(quiggly, katie))\nforall x (Unsex(x, jolee) and not Unsex(x, katie) -> not Unrefined(jolee))\nforall x (Macho(x) and not Unrefined(x) -> Cheap(x))\nnot Cheap(quiggly) -> not Accented(quiggly)\nCheap(katie) and Handicap(katie, quiggly) -> Accented(quiggly)\n\nCalm(jae, jae)\n\nCalm(jae, jae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The ileane satellite the devonna. The ileane does not chase the pepi. The ileane is newsworthy. The ileane is alleged. The ileane tangle the devonna. The ileane does not like the pepi. The ileane tangle the stafani. The ileane waver the stafani. The devonna is choky. The devonna tangle the ileane. The devonna tangle the stafani. The devonna waver the stafani. The pepi satellite the devonna. The pepi does not need the ileane. The stafani tangle the pepi. If the ileane is alleged then the ileane satellite the stafani. If something satellite the stafani then the stafani waver the ileane. If the stafani waver the ileane and the ileane tangle the devonna then the devonna waver the ileane. If something waver the pepi and the pepi is unheaded then the pepi waver the devonna. If something waver the stafani and it does not need the devonna then the stafani is not newsworthy. If something is alleged and not newsworthy then it is choky. If the pepi is not choky then the pepi is not boxed. If the devonna is choky and the devonna satellite the pepi then the pepi is boxed. The devonna does not like the devonna.", "logic": "\nSatellite(ileane, devonna)\nnot Satellite(ileane, pepi)\nNewsworthy(ileane)\nAlleged(ileane)\nTangle(ileane, devonna)\nnot Tangle(ileane, pepi)\nTangle(ileane, stafani)\nWaver(ileane, stafani)\nChoky(devonna)\nTangle(devonna, ileane)\nTangle(devonna, stafani)\nWaver(devonna, stafani)\nSatellite(pepi, devonna)\nnot Waver(pepi, ileane)\nTangle(stafani, pepi)\nAlleged(ileane) -> Satellite(ileane, stafani)\nforall x (Satellite(x, stafani) -> Waver(stafani, ileane))\nWaver(stafani, ileane) and Tangle(ileane, devonna) -> Waver(devonna, ileane)\nforall x (Waver(x, pepi) and Unheaded(pepi) -> Waver(pepi, devonna))\nforall x (Waver(x, stafani) and not Waver(x, devonna) -> not Newsworthy(stafani))\nforall x (Alleged(x) and not Newsworthy(x) -> Choky(x))\nnot Choky(pepi) -> not Boxed(pepi)\nChoky(devonna) and Satellite(devonna, pepi) -> Boxed(pepi)\n\nnot Tangle(devonna, devonna)\n\nnot Tangle(devonna, devonna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The herman breach the diego. The herman does not chase the robinette. The herman is ternary. The herman is identified. The herman smatter the diego. The herman does not like the robinette. The herman smatter the venkat. The herman ascribe the venkat. The diego is usurious. The diego smatter the herman. The diego smatter the venkat. The diego ascribe the venkat. The robinette breach the diego. The robinette does not need the herman. The venkat smatter the robinette. If the herman is identified then the herman breach the venkat. If something breach the venkat then the venkat ascribe the herman. If the venkat ascribe the herman and the herman smatter the diego then the diego ascribe the herman. If something ascribe the robinette and the robinette is unsleeping then the robinette ascribe the diego. If something ascribe the venkat and it does not need the diego then the venkat is not ternary. If something is identified and not ternary then it is usurious. If the robinette is not usurious then the robinette is not pilous. If the diego is usurious and the diego breach the robinette then the robinette is pilous. The robinette smatter the venkat.", "logic": "\nBreach(herman, diego)\nnot Breach(herman, robinette)\nTernary(herman)\nIdentified(herman)\nSmatter(herman, diego)\nnot Smatter(herman, robinette)\nSmatter(herman, venkat)\nAscribe(herman, venkat)\nUsurious(diego)\nSmatter(diego, herman)\nSmatter(diego, venkat)\nAscribe(diego, venkat)\nBreach(robinette, diego)\nnot Ascribe(robinette, herman)\nSmatter(venkat, robinette)\nIdentified(herman) -> Breach(herman, venkat)\nforall x (Breach(x, venkat) -> Ascribe(venkat, herman))\nAscribe(venkat, herman) and Smatter(herman, diego) -> Ascribe(diego, herman)\nforall x (Ascribe(x, robinette) and Unsleeping(robinette) -> Ascribe(robinette, diego))\nforall x (Ascribe(x, venkat) and not Ascribe(x, diego) -> not Ternary(venkat))\nforall x (Identified(x) and not Ternary(x) -> Usurious(x))\nnot Usurious(robinette) -> not Pilous(robinette)\nUsurious(diego) and Breach(diego, robinette) -> Pilous(robinette)\n\nSmatter(robinette, venkat)\n\nSmatter(robinette, venkat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The rachele forebode the velvet. The rachele is chemic. The rachele laicise the giff. The velvet is offside. The velvet is dolorous. The velvet is darkening. The velvet laicise the rachele. The velvet dishonor the corenda. The giff forebode the corenda. The giff is darkening. The corenda forebode the rachele. The corenda is chemic. The corenda laicise the rachele. The corenda laicise the velvet. The corenda dishonor the velvet. If someone dishonor the giff then they are gushing. All darkening people are gushing. If someone laicise the corenda then they chase the rachele. If someone forebode the rachele and they are darkening then the rachele dishonor the corenda. If someone is gushing then they chase the giff. If someone forebode the velvet and the velvet laicise the giff then they need the giff. If someone is chemic and they chase the rachele then they are darkening. If the rachele is darkening and the rachele forebode the corenda then the rachele is gushing. The corenda dishonor the velvet.", "logic": "\nForebode(rachele, velvet)\nChemic(rachele)\nLaicise(rachele, giff)\nOffside(velvet)\nDolorous(velvet)\nDarkening(velvet)\nLaicise(velvet, rachele)\nDishonor(velvet, corenda)\nForebode(giff, corenda)\nDarkening(giff)\nForebode(corenda, rachele)\nChemic(corenda)\nLaicise(corenda, rachele)\nLaicise(corenda, velvet)\nDishonor(corenda, velvet)\nforall x (Dishonor(x, giff) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Darkening(x) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Laicise(x, corenda) -> Forebode(x, rachele))\nforall x (Forebode(x, rachele) and Darkening(x) -> Dishonor(rachele, corenda))\nforall x (Gushing(x) -> Forebode(x, giff))\nforall x (Forebode(x, velvet) and Laicise(velvet, giff) -> Dishonor(x, giff))\nforall x (Chemic(x) and Forebode(x, rachele) -> Darkening(x))\nDarkening(rachele) and Forebode(rachele, corenda) -> Gushing(rachele)\n\nDishonor(corenda, velvet)\n\ntherefore Dishonor(corenda, velvet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The karly enter the gui. The karly is clxxx. The karly traumatise the dorian. The gui is stirred. The gui is apnoeic. The gui is unclogged. The gui traumatise the karly. The gui stigmatise the tiena. The dorian enter the tiena. The dorian is unclogged. The tiena enter the karly. The tiena is clxxx. The tiena traumatise the karly. The tiena traumatise the gui. The tiena stigmatise the gui. If someone stigmatise the dorian then they are singular. All unclogged people are singular. If someone traumatise the tiena then they chase the karly. If someone enter the karly and they are unclogged then the karly stigmatise the tiena. If someone is singular then they chase the dorian. If someone enter the gui and the gui traumatise the dorian then they need the dorian. If someone is clxxx and they chase the karly then they are unclogged. If the karly is unclogged and the karly enter the tiena then the karly is singular. The tiena does not chase the karly.", "logic": "\nEnter(karly, gui)\nClxxx(karly)\nTraumatise(karly, dorian)\nStirred(gui)\nApnoeic(gui)\nUnclogged(gui)\nTraumatise(gui, karly)\nStigmatise(gui, tiena)\nEnter(dorian, tiena)\nUnclogged(dorian)\nEnter(tiena, karly)\nClxxx(tiena)\nTraumatise(tiena, karly)\nTraumatise(tiena, gui)\nStigmatise(tiena, gui)\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, dorian) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Unclogged(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Traumatise(x, tiena) -> Enter(x, karly))\nforall x (Enter(x, karly) and Unclogged(x) -> Stigmatise(karly, tiena))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Enter(x, dorian))\nforall x (Enter(x, gui) and Traumatise(gui, dorian) -> Stigmatise(x, dorian))\nforall x (Clxxx(x) and Enter(x, karly) -> Unclogged(x))\nUnclogged(karly) and Enter(karly, tiena) -> Singular(karly)\n\nnot Enter(tiena, karly)\n\ntherefore Enter(tiena, karly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The jimmy gentrify the robbert. The jimmy is blond. The jimmy motorcycle the melody. The robbert is unfurrowed. The robbert is jointed. The robbert is dainty. The robbert motorcycle the jimmy. The robbert obligate the marlow. The melody gentrify the marlow. The melody is dainty. The marlow gentrify the jimmy. The marlow is blond. The marlow motorcycle the jimmy. The marlow motorcycle the robbert. The marlow obligate the robbert. If someone obligate the melody then they are nugatory. All dainty people are nugatory. If someone motorcycle the marlow then they chase the jimmy. If someone gentrify the jimmy and they are dainty then the jimmy obligate the marlow. If someone is nugatory then they chase the melody. If someone gentrify the robbert and the robbert motorcycle the melody then they need the melody. If someone is blond and they chase the jimmy then they are dainty. If the jimmy is dainty and the jimmy gentrify the marlow then the jimmy is nugatory. The marlow is dainty.", "logic": "\nGentrify(jimmy, robbert)\nBlond(jimmy)\nMotorcycle(jimmy, melody)\nUnfurrowed(robbert)\nJointed(robbert)\nDainty(robbert)\nMotorcycle(robbert, jimmy)\nObligate(robbert, marlow)\nGentrify(melody, marlow)\nDainty(melody)\nGentrify(marlow, jimmy)\nBlond(marlow)\nMotorcycle(marlow, jimmy)\nMotorcycle(marlow, robbert)\nObligate(marlow, robbert)\nforall x (Obligate(x, melody) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Dainty(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, marlow) -> Gentrify(x, jimmy))\nforall x (Gentrify(x, jimmy) and Dainty(x) -> Obligate(jimmy, marlow))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Gentrify(x, melody))\nforall x (Gentrify(x, robbert) and Motorcycle(robbert, melody) -> Obligate(x, melody))\nforall x (Blond(x) and Gentrify(x, jimmy) -> Dainty(x))\nDainty(jimmy) and Gentrify(jimmy, marlow) -> Nugatory(jimmy)\n\nDainty(marlow)\n\nBlond(marlow) and Gentrify(marlow, jimmy) and forall x (Blond(x) and Gentrify(x, jimmy) -> Dainty(x)) -> therefore Dainty(marlow)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The harmonie obtrude the jory. The harmonie is untidy. The harmonie outfit the heinz. The jory is priapic. The jory is snowy. The jory is underwater. The jory outfit the harmonie. The jory ride the devina. The heinz obtrude the devina. The heinz is underwater. The devina obtrude the harmonie. The devina is untidy. The devina outfit the harmonie. The devina outfit the jory. The devina ride the jory. If someone ride the heinz then they are hottish. All underwater people are hottish. If someone outfit the devina then they chase the harmonie. If someone obtrude the harmonie and they are underwater then the harmonie ride the devina. If someone is hottish then they chase the heinz. If someone obtrude the jory and the jory outfit the heinz then they need the heinz. If someone is untidy and they chase the harmonie then they are underwater. If the harmonie is underwater and the harmonie obtrude the devina then the harmonie is hottish. The jory is not hottish.", "logic": "\nObtrude(harmonie, jory)\nUntidy(harmonie)\nOutfit(harmonie, heinz)\nPriapic(jory)\nSnowy(jory)\nUnderwater(jory)\nOutfit(jory, harmonie)\nRide(jory, devina)\nObtrude(heinz, devina)\nUnderwater(heinz)\nObtrude(devina, harmonie)\nUntidy(devina)\nOutfit(devina, harmonie)\nOutfit(devina, jory)\nRide(devina, jory)\nforall x (Ride(x, heinz) -> Hottish(x))\nforall x (Underwater(x) -> Hottish(x))\nforall x (Outfit(x, devina) -> Obtrude(x, harmonie))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, harmonie) and Underwater(x) -> Ride(harmonie, devina))\nforall x (Hottish(x) -> Obtrude(x, heinz))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, jory) and Outfit(jory, heinz) -> Ride(x, heinz))\nforall x (Untidy(x) and Obtrude(x, harmonie) -> Underwater(x))\nUnderwater(harmonie) and Obtrude(harmonie, devina) -> Hottish(harmonie)\n\nnot Hottish(jory)\n\nUnderwater(jory) and forall x (Underwater(x) -> Hottish(x)) -> therefore Hottish(jory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The nikki accost the vasili. The nikki is wooden. The nikki disallow the arron. The vasili is spiritless. The vasili is weighty. The vasili is grassroots. The vasili disallow the nikki. The vasili secernate the vijay. The arron accost the vijay. The arron is grassroots. The vijay accost the nikki. The vijay is wooden. The vijay disallow the nikki. The vijay disallow the vasili. The vijay secernate the vasili. If someone secernate the arron then they are canned. All grassroots people are canned. If someone disallow the vijay then they chase the nikki. If someone accost the nikki and they are grassroots then the nikki secernate the vijay. If someone is canned then they chase the arron. If someone accost the vasili and the vasili disallow the arron then they need the arron. If someone is wooden and they chase the nikki then they are grassroots. If the nikki is grassroots and the nikki accost the vijay then the nikki is canned. The vasili accost the arron.", "logic": "\nAccost(nikki, vasili)\nWooden(nikki)\nDisallow(nikki, arron)\nSpiritless(vasili)\nWeighty(vasili)\nGrassroots(vasili)\nDisallow(vasili, nikki)\nSecernate(vasili, vijay)\nAccost(arron, vijay)\nGrassroots(arron)\nAccost(vijay, nikki)\nWooden(vijay)\nDisallow(vijay, nikki)\nDisallow(vijay, vasili)\nSecernate(vijay, vasili)\nforall x (Secernate(x, arron) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Disallow(x, vijay) -> Accost(x, nikki))\nforall x (Accost(x, nikki) and Grassroots(x) -> Secernate(nikki, vijay))\nforall x (Canned(x) -> Accost(x, arron))\nforall x (Accost(x, vasili) and Disallow(vasili, arron) -> Secernate(x, arron))\nforall x (Wooden(x) and Accost(x, nikki) -> Grassroots(x))\nGrassroots(nikki) and Accost(nikki, vijay) -> Canned(nikki)\n\nAccost(vasili, arron)\n\nGrassroots(vasili) and forall x (Grassroots(x) -> Canned(x)) -> therefore Canned(vasili) Canned(vasili) and forall x (Canned(x) -> Accost(x, arron)) -> therefore Accost(vasili, arron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The elenore attenuate the teane. The elenore is phyllodial. The elenore aline the fulton. The teane is doglike. The teane is fetid. The teane is unhumorous. The teane aline the elenore. The teane mistime the conni. The fulton attenuate the conni. The fulton is unhumorous. The conni attenuate the elenore. The conni is phyllodial. The conni aline the elenore. The conni aline the teane. The conni mistime the teane. If someone mistime the fulton then they are acetonic. All unhumorous people are acetonic. If someone aline the conni then they chase the elenore. If someone attenuate the elenore and they are unhumorous then the elenore mistime the conni. If someone is acetonic then they chase the fulton. If someone attenuate the teane and the teane aline the fulton then they need the fulton. If someone is phyllodial and they chase the elenore then they are unhumorous. If the elenore is unhumorous and the elenore attenuate the conni then the elenore is acetonic. The conni is not acetonic.", "logic": "\nAttenuate(elenore, teane)\nPhyllodial(elenore)\nAline(elenore, fulton)\nDoglike(teane)\nFetid(teane)\nUnhumorous(teane)\nAline(teane, elenore)\nMistime(teane, conni)\nAttenuate(fulton, conni)\nUnhumorous(fulton)\nAttenuate(conni, elenore)\nPhyllodial(conni)\nAline(conni, elenore)\nAline(conni, teane)\nMistime(conni, teane)\nforall x (Mistime(x, fulton) -> Acetonic(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) -> Acetonic(x))\nforall x (Aline(x, conni) -> Attenuate(x, elenore))\nforall x (Attenuate(x, elenore) and Unhumorous(x) -> Mistime(elenore, conni))\nforall x (Acetonic(x) -> Attenuate(x, fulton))\nforall x (Attenuate(x, teane) and Aline(teane, fulton) -> Mistime(x, fulton))\nforall x (Phyllodial(x) and Attenuate(x, elenore) -> Unhumorous(x))\nUnhumorous(elenore) and Attenuate(elenore, conni) -> Acetonic(elenore)\n\nnot Acetonic(conni)\n\nPhyllodial(conni) and Attenuate(conni, elenore) and forall x (Phyllodial(x) and Attenuate(x, elenore) -> Unhumorous(x)) -> therefore Unhumorous(conni) Unhumorous(conni) and forall x (Unhumorous(x) -> Acetonic(x)) -> therefore Acetonic(conni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The roni cavil the selby. The roni is downtown. The roni perspire the gavra. The selby is thirty. The selby is unroofed. The selby is calcaneal. The selby perspire the roni. The selby price the valentina. The gavra cavil the valentina. The gavra is calcaneal. The valentina cavil the roni. The valentina is downtown. The valentina perspire the roni. The valentina perspire the selby. The valentina price the selby. If someone price the gavra then they are tubelike. All calcaneal people are tubelike. If someone perspire the valentina then they chase the roni. If someone cavil the roni and they are calcaneal then the roni price the valentina. If someone is tubelike then they chase the gavra. If someone cavil the selby and the selby perspire the gavra then they need the gavra. If someone is downtown and they chase the roni then they are calcaneal. If the roni is calcaneal and the roni cavil the valentina then the roni is tubelike. The valentina cavil the gavra.", "logic": "\nCavil(roni, selby)\nDowntown(roni)\nPerspire(roni, gavra)\nThirty(selby)\nUnroofed(selby)\nCalcaneal(selby)\nPerspire(selby, roni)\nPrice(selby, valentina)\nCavil(gavra, valentina)\nCalcaneal(gavra)\nCavil(valentina, roni)\nDowntown(valentina)\nPerspire(valentina, roni)\nPerspire(valentina, selby)\nPrice(valentina, selby)\nforall x (Price(x, gavra) -> Tubelike(x))\nforall x (Calcaneal(x) -> Tubelike(x))\nforall x (Perspire(x, valentina) -> Cavil(x, roni))\nforall x (Cavil(x, roni) and Calcaneal(x) -> Price(roni, valentina))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) -> Cavil(x, gavra))\nforall x (Cavil(x, selby) and Perspire(selby, gavra) -> Price(x, gavra))\nforall x (Downtown(x) and Cavil(x, roni) -> Calcaneal(x))\nCalcaneal(roni) and Cavil(roni, valentina) -> Tubelike(roni)\n\nCavil(valentina, gavra)\n\nDowntown(valentina) and Cavil(valentina, roni) and forall x (Downtown(x) and Cavil(x, roni) -> Calcaneal(x)) -> therefore Calcaneal(valentina) Calcaneal(valentina) and forall x (Calcaneal(x) -> Tubelike(x)) -> therefore Tubelike(valentina) Tubelike(valentina) and forall x (Tubelike(x) -> Cavil(x, gavra)) -> therefore Cavil(valentina, gavra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The ambros peal the malia. The ambros is pliant. The ambros trench the osbourne. The malia is foxy. The malia is mellowed. The malia is mammary. The malia trench the ambros. The malia visualise the dian. The osbourne peal the dian. The osbourne is mammary. The dian peal the ambros. The dian is pliant. The dian trench the ambros. The dian trench the malia. The dian visualise the malia. If someone visualise the osbourne then they are uncooked. All mammary people are uncooked. If someone trench the dian then they chase the ambros. If someone peal the ambros and they are mammary then the ambros visualise the dian. If someone is uncooked then they chase the osbourne. If someone peal the malia and the malia trench the osbourne then they need the osbourne. If someone is pliant and they chase the ambros then they are mammary. If the ambros is mammary and the ambros peal the dian then the ambros is uncooked. The dian does not chase the osbourne.", "logic": "\nPeal(ambros, malia)\nPliant(ambros)\nTrench(ambros, osbourne)\nFoxy(malia)\nMellowed(malia)\nMammary(malia)\nTrench(malia, ambros)\nVisualise(malia, dian)\nPeal(osbourne, dian)\nMammary(osbourne)\nPeal(dian, ambros)\nPliant(dian)\nTrench(dian, ambros)\nTrench(dian, malia)\nVisualise(dian, malia)\nforall x (Visualise(x, osbourne) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Trench(x, dian) -> Peal(x, ambros))\nforall x (Peal(x, ambros) and Mammary(x) -> Visualise(ambros, dian))\nforall x (Uncooked(x) -> Peal(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Peal(x, malia) and Trench(malia, osbourne) -> Visualise(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Pliant(x) and Peal(x, ambros) -> Mammary(x))\nMammary(ambros) and Peal(ambros, dian) -> Uncooked(ambros)\n\nnot Peal(dian, osbourne)\n\nPliant(dian) and Peal(dian, ambros) and forall x (Pliant(x) and Peal(x, ambros) -> Mammary(x)) -> therefore Mammary(dian) Mammary(dian) and forall x (Mammary(x) -> Uncooked(x)) -> therefore Uncooked(dian) Uncooked(dian) and forall x (Uncooked(x) -> Peal(x, osbourne)) -> therefore Peal(dian, osbourne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The glynn moor the brandie. The glynn is escaped. The glynn outdo the karsten. The brandie is lacy. The brandie is neckless. The brandie is changed. The brandie outdo the glynn. The brandie pale the agnesse. The karsten moor the agnesse. The karsten is changed. The agnesse moor the glynn. The agnesse is escaped. The agnesse outdo the glynn. The agnesse outdo the brandie. The agnesse pale the brandie. If someone pale the karsten then they are verifying. All changed people are verifying. If someone outdo the agnesse then they chase the glynn. If someone moor the glynn and they are changed then the glynn pale the agnesse. If someone is verifying then they chase the karsten. If someone moor the brandie and the brandie outdo the karsten then they need the karsten. If someone is escaped and they chase the glynn then they are changed. If the glynn is changed and the glynn moor the agnesse then the glynn is verifying. The brandie does not need the karsten.", "logic": "\nMoor(glynn, brandie)\nEscaped(glynn)\nOutdo(glynn, karsten)\nLacy(brandie)\nNeckless(brandie)\nChanged(brandie)\nOutdo(brandie, glynn)\nPale(brandie, agnesse)\nMoor(karsten, agnesse)\nChanged(karsten)\nMoor(agnesse, glynn)\nEscaped(agnesse)\nOutdo(agnesse, glynn)\nOutdo(agnesse, brandie)\nPale(agnesse, brandie)\nforall x (Pale(x, karsten) -> Verifying(x))\nforall x (Changed(x) -> Verifying(x))\nforall x (Outdo(x, agnesse) -> Moor(x, glynn))\nforall x (Moor(x, glynn) and Changed(x) -> Pale(glynn, agnesse))\nforall x (Verifying(x) -> Moor(x, karsten))\nforall x (Moor(x, brandie) and Outdo(brandie, karsten) -> Pale(x, karsten))\nforall x (Escaped(x) and Moor(x, glynn) -> Changed(x))\nChanged(glynn) and Moor(glynn, agnesse) -> Verifying(glynn)\n\nnot Pale(brandie, karsten)\n\nforall x (Moor(x, brandie) and Outdo(brandie, karsten) -> Pale(x, karsten)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The ibrahim outshout the alison. The ibrahim is prolonged. The ibrahim slither the rodge. The alison is cuneate. The alison is syndetic. The alison is succinct. The alison slither the ibrahim. The alison kick the herbert. The rodge outshout the herbert. The rodge is succinct. The herbert outshout the ibrahim. The herbert is prolonged. The herbert slither the ibrahim. The herbert slither the alison. The herbert kick the alison. If someone kick the rodge then they are intangible. All succinct people are intangible. If someone slither the herbert then they chase the ibrahim. If someone outshout the ibrahim and they are succinct then the ibrahim kick the herbert. If someone is intangible then they chase the rodge. If someone outshout the alison and the alison slither the rodge then they need the rodge. If someone is prolonged and they chase the ibrahim then they are succinct. If the ibrahim is succinct and the ibrahim outshout the herbert then the ibrahim is intangible. The rodge kick the rodge.", "logic": "\nOutshout(ibrahim, alison)\nProlonged(ibrahim)\nSlither(ibrahim, rodge)\nCuneate(alison)\nSyndetic(alison)\nSuccinct(alison)\nSlither(alison, ibrahim)\nKick(alison, herbert)\nOutshout(rodge, herbert)\nSuccinct(rodge)\nOutshout(herbert, ibrahim)\nProlonged(herbert)\nSlither(herbert, ibrahim)\nSlither(herbert, alison)\nKick(herbert, alison)\nforall x (Kick(x, rodge) -> Intangible(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Intangible(x))\nforall x (Slither(x, herbert) -> Outshout(x, ibrahim))\nforall x (Outshout(x, ibrahim) and Succinct(x) -> Kick(ibrahim, herbert))\nforall x (Intangible(x) -> Outshout(x, rodge))\nforall x (Outshout(x, alison) and Slither(alison, rodge) -> Kick(x, rodge))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) and Outshout(x, ibrahim) -> Succinct(x))\nSuccinct(ibrahim) and Outshout(ibrahim, herbert) -> Intangible(ibrahim)\n\nKick(rodge, rodge)\n\nforall x (Outshout(x, alison) and Slither(alison, rodge) -> Kick(x, rodge)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The katuscha overmaster the dyanne. The katuscha is abomasal. The katuscha gutter the gina. The dyanne is unaged. The dyanne is excited. The dyanne is indefinite. The dyanne gutter the katuscha. The dyanne defect the parker. The gina overmaster the parker. The gina is indefinite. The parker overmaster the katuscha. The parker is abomasal. The parker gutter the katuscha. The parker gutter the dyanne. The parker defect the dyanne. If someone defect the gina then they are aboveboard. All indefinite people are aboveboard. If someone gutter the parker then they chase the katuscha. If someone overmaster the katuscha and they are indefinite then the katuscha defect the parker. If someone is aboveboard then they chase the gina. If someone overmaster the dyanne and the dyanne gutter the gina then they need the gina. If someone is abomasal and they chase the katuscha then they are indefinite. If the katuscha is indefinite and the katuscha overmaster the parker then the katuscha is aboveboard. The katuscha is not indefinite.", "logic": "\nOvermaster(katuscha, dyanne)\nAbomasal(katuscha)\nGutter(katuscha, gina)\nUnaged(dyanne)\nExcited(dyanne)\nIndefinite(dyanne)\nGutter(dyanne, katuscha)\nDefect(dyanne, parker)\nOvermaster(gina, parker)\nIndefinite(gina)\nOvermaster(parker, katuscha)\nAbomasal(parker)\nGutter(parker, katuscha)\nGutter(parker, dyanne)\nDefect(parker, dyanne)\nforall x (Defect(x, gina) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Indefinite(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Gutter(x, parker) -> Overmaster(x, katuscha))\nforall x (Overmaster(x, katuscha) and Indefinite(x) -> Defect(katuscha, parker))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Overmaster(x, gina))\nforall x (Overmaster(x, dyanne) and Gutter(dyanne, gina) -> Defect(x, gina))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Overmaster(x, katuscha) -> Indefinite(x))\nIndefinite(katuscha) and Overmaster(katuscha, parker) -> Aboveboard(katuscha)\n\nnot Indefinite(katuscha)\n\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Overmaster(x, katuscha) -> Indefinite(x)) <- forall x (Gutter(x, parker) -> Overmaster(x, katuscha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The deina translate the valerye. The deina is unlocked. The deina flinch the schuyler. The valerye is chambered. The valerye is pellucid. The valerye is collagenic. The valerye flinch the deina. The valerye egress the tonnie. The schuyler translate the tonnie. The schuyler is collagenic. The tonnie translate the deina. The tonnie is unlocked. The tonnie flinch the deina. The tonnie flinch the valerye. The tonnie egress the valerye. If someone egress the schuyler then they are khaki. All collagenic people are khaki. If someone flinch the tonnie then they chase the deina. If someone translate the deina and they are collagenic then the deina egress the tonnie. If someone is khaki then they chase the schuyler. If someone translate the valerye and the valerye flinch the schuyler then they need the schuyler. If someone is unlocked and they chase the deina then they are collagenic. If the deina is collagenic and the deina translate the tonnie then the deina is khaki. The valerye translate the deina.", "logic": "\nTranslate(deina, valerye)\nUnlocked(deina)\nFlinch(deina, schuyler)\nChambered(valerye)\nPellucid(valerye)\nCollagenic(valerye)\nFlinch(valerye, deina)\nEgress(valerye, tonnie)\nTranslate(schuyler, tonnie)\nCollagenic(schuyler)\nTranslate(tonnie, deina)\nUnlocked(tonnie)\nFlinch(tonnie, deina)\nFlinch(tonnie, valerye)\nEgress(tonnie, valerye)\nforall x (Egress(x, schuyler) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Collagenic(x) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Flinch(x, tonnie) -> Translate(x, deina))\nforall x (Translate(x, deina) and Collagenic(x) -> Egress(deina, tonnie))\nforall x (Khaki(x) -> Translate(x, schuyler))\nforall x (Translate(x, valerye) and Flinch(valerye, schuyler) -> Egress(x, schuyler))\nforall x (Unlocked(x) and Translate(x, deina) -> Collagenic(x))\nCollagenic(deina) and Translate(deina, tonnie) -> Khaki(deina)\n\nTranslate(valerye, deina)\n\nforall x (Flinch(x, tonnie) -> Translate(x, deina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The graham duel the waneta. The graham is oncoming. The graham insist the modestia. The waneta is connected. The waneta is pointed. The waneta is english. The waneta insist the graham. The waneta martyrise the georg. The modestia duel the georg. The modestia is english. The georg duel the graham. The georg is oncoming. The georg insist the graham. The georg insist the waneta. The georg martyrise the waneta. If someone martyrise the modestia then they are isothermal. All english people are isothermal. If someone insist the georg then they chase the graham. If someone duel the graham and they are english then the graham martyrise the georg. If someone is isothermal then they chase the modestia. If someone duel the waneta and the waneta insist the modestia then they need the modestia. If someone is oncoming and they chase the graham then they are english. If the graham is english and the graham duel the georg then the graham is isothermal. The waneta does not chase the georg.", "logic": "\nDuel(graham, waneta)\nOncoming(graham)\nInsist(graham, modestia)\nConnected(waneta)\nPointed(waneta)\nEnglish(waneta)\nInsist(waneta, graham)\nMartyrise(waneta, georg)\nDuel(modestia, georg)\nEnglish(modestia)\nDuel(georg, graham)\nOncoming(georg)\nInsist(georg, graham)\nInsist(georg, waneta)\nMartyrise(georg, waneta)\nforall x (Martyrise(x, modestia) -> Isothermal(x))\nforall x (English(x) -> Isothermal(x))\nforall x (Insist(x, georg) -> Duel(x, graham))\nforall x (Duel(x, graham) and English(x) -> Martyrise(graham, georg))\nforall x (Isothermal(x) -> Duel(x, modestia))\nforall x (Duel(x, waneta) and Insist(waneta, modestia) -> Martyrise(x, modestia))\nforall x (Oncoming(x) and Duel(x, graham) -> English(x))\nEnglish(graham) and Duel(graham, georg) -> Isothermal(graham)\n\nnot Duel(waneta, georg)\n\nnot Duel(waneta, georg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The valentin overtake the lazlo. The valentin is sensory. The valentin enlighten the waine. The lazlo is trihydroxy. The lazlo is developing. The lazlo is billionth. The lazlo enlighten the valentin. The lazlo nosedive the hector. The waine overtake the hector. The waine is billionth. The hector overtake the valentin. The hector is sensory. The hector enlighten the valentin. The hector enlighten the lazlo. The hector nosedive the lazlo. If someone nosedive the waine then they are nonliteral. All billionth people are nonliteral. If someone enlighten the hector then they chase the valentin. If someone overtake the valentin and they are billionth then the valentin nosedive the hector. If someone is nonliteral then they chase the waine. If someone overtake the lazlo and the lazlo enlighten the waine then they need the waine. If someone is sensory and they chase the valentin then they are billionth. If the valentin is billionth and the valentin overtake the hector then the valentin is nonliteral. The waine enlighten the lazlo.", "logic": "\nOvertake(valentin, lazlo)\nSensory(valentin)\nEnlighten(valentin, waine)\nTrihydroxy(lazlo)\nDeveloping(lazlo)\nBillionth(lazlo)\nEnlighten(lazlo, valentin)\nNosedive(lazlo, hector)\nOvertake(waine, hector)\nBillionth(waine)\nOvertake(hector, valentin)\nSensory(hector)\nEnlighten(hector, valentin)\nEnlighten(hector, lazlo)\nNosedive(hector, lazlo)\nforall x (Nosedive(x, waine) -> Nonliteral(x))\nforall x (Billionth(x) -> Nonliteral(x))\nforall x (Enlighten(x, hector) -> Overtake(x, valentin))\nforall x (Overtake(x, valentin) and Billionth(x) -> Nosedive(valentin, hector))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Overtake(x, waine))\nforall x (Overtake(x, lazlo) and Enlighten(lazlo, waine) -> Nosedive(x, waine))\nforall x (Sensory(x) and Overtake(x, valentin) -> Billionth(x))\nBillionth(valentin) and Overtake(valentin, hector) -> Nonliteral(valentin)\n\nEnlighten(waine, lazlo)\n\nEnlighten(waine, lazlo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The gipsy exclude the maddie. The gipsy is hopeless. The gipsy uncover the edee. The maddie is mercurial. The maddie is granular. The maddie is uttermost. The maddie uncover the gipsy. The maddie unreel the gussie. The edee exclude the gussie. The edee is uttermost. The gussie exclude the gipsy. The gussie is hopeless. The gussie uncover the gipsy. The gussie uncover the maddie. The gussie unreel the maddie. If someone unreel the edee then they are wigless. All uttermost people are wigless. If someone uncover the gussie then they chase the gipsy. If someone exclude the gipsy and they are uttermost then the gipsy unreel the gussie. If someone is wigless then they chase the edee. If someone exclude the maddie and the maddie uncover the edee then they need the edee. If someone is hopeless and they chase the gipsy then they are uttermost. If the gipsy is uttermost and the gipsy exclude the gussie then the gipsy is wigless. The edee is not hopeless.", "logic": "\nExclude(gipsy, maddie)\nHopeless(gipsy)\nUncover(gipsy, edee)\nMercurial(maddie)\nGranular(maddie)\nUttermost(maddie)\nUncover(maddie, gipsy)\nUnreel(maddie, gussie)\nExclude(edee, gussie)\nUttermost(edee)\nExclude(gussie, gipsy)\nHopeless(gussie)\nUncover(gussie, gipsy)\nUncover(gussie, maddie)\nUnreel(gussie, maddie)\nforall x (Unreel(x, edee) -> Wigless(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Wigless(x))\nforall x (Uncover(x, gussie) -> Exclude(x, gipsy))\nforall x (Exclude(x, gipsy) and Uttermost(x) -> Unreel(gipsy, gussie))\nforall x (Wigless(x) -> Exclude(x, edee))\nforall x (Exclude(x, maddie) and Uncover(maddie, edee) -> Unreel(x, edee))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) and Exclude(x, gipsy) -> Uttermost(x))\nUttermost(gipsy) and Exclude(gipsy, gussie) -> Wigless(gipsy)\n\nnot Hopeless(edee)\n\nnot Hopeless(edee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The lian besprinkle the delcina. The lian is invariant. The lian voyage the debbra. The delcina is argentous. The delcina is amnionic. The delcina is beat. The delcina voyage the lian. The delcina renew the eileen. The debbra besprinkle the eileen. The debbra is beat. The eileen besprinkle the lian. The eileen is invariant. The eileen voyage the lian. The eileen voyage the delcina. The eileen renew the delcina. If someone renew the debbra then they are xcvii. All beat people are xcvii. If someone voyage the eileen then they chase the lian. If someone besprinkle the lian and they are beat then the lian renew the eileen. If someone is xcvii then they chase the debbra. If someone besprinkle the delcina and the delcina voyage the debbra then they need the debbra. If someone is invariant and they chase the lian then they are beat. If the lian is beat and the lian besprinkle the eileen then the lian is xcvii. The eileen is argentous.", "logic": "\nBesprinkle(lian, delcina)\nInvariant(lian)\nVoyage(lian, debbra)\nArgentous(delcina)\nAmnionic(delcina)\nBeat(delcina)\nVoyage(delcina, lian)\nRenew(delcina, eileen)\nBesprinkle(debbra, eileen)\nBeat(debbra)\nBesprinkle(eileen, lian)\nInvariant(eileen)\nVoyage(eileen, lian)\nVoyage(eileen, delcina)\nRenew(eileen, delcina)\nforall x (Renew(x, debbra) -> Xcvii(x))\nforall x (Beat(x) -> Xcvii(x))\nforall x (Voyage(x, eileen) -> Besprinkle(x, lian))\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, lian) and Beat(x) -> Renew(lian, eileen))\nforall x (Xcvii(x) -> Besprinkle(x, debbra))\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, delcina) and Voyage(delcina, debbra) -> Renew(x, debbra))\nforall x (Invariant(x) and Besprinkle(x, lian) -> Beat(x))\nBeat(lian) and Besprinkle(lian, eileen) -> Xcvii(lian)\n\nArgentous(eileen)\n\nArgentous(eileen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The hilarie is effete. The hilarie is cataclinal. The lucky is not whiskered. The lucky is not effete. The lucky is cataclinal. The lucky queen the ashlen. The ashlen is effete. The ashlen whizz the lucky. The ashlen deign the hilarie. The rickey is cataclinal. If someone queen the ashlen then they see the lucky. If someone queen the lucky then the lucky does not see the hilarie. If someone queen the hilarie and they like the ashlen then the ashlen whizz the lucky. If the lucky is lachrymal then the lucky whizz the ashlen. If the hilarie queen the lucky then the lucky does not see the rickey. If the rickey is lachrymal then the rickey whizz the hilarie. If someone whizz the rickey then they need the lucky. If someone is cataclinal and they do not see the hilarie then the hilarie deign the ashlen. The hilarie is cataclinal.", "logic": "\nEffete(hilarie)\nCataclinal(hilarie)\nnot Whiskered(lucky)\nnot Effete(lucky)\nCataclinal(lucky)\nQueen(lucky, ashlen)\nEffete(ashlen)\nWhizz(ashlen, lucky)\nDeign(ashlen, hilarie)\nCataclinal(rickey)\nforall x (Queen(x, ashlen) -> Queen(x, lucky))\nforall x (Queen(x, lucky) -> not Queen(lucky, hilarie))\nforall x (Queen(x, hilarie) and Whizz(x, ashlen) -> Whizz(ashlen, lucky))\nLachrymal(lucky) -> Whizz(lucky, ashlen)\nQueen(hilarie, lucky) -> not Queen(lucky, rickey)\nLachrymal(rickey) -> Whizz(rickey, hilarie)\nforall x (Whizz(x, rickey) -> Deign(x, lucky))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) and not Queen(x, hilarie) -> Deign(hilarie, ashlen))\n\nCataclinal(hilarie)\n\ntherefore Cataclinal(hilarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The latrina is blebbed. The latrina is overbold. The gracia is not estrous. The gracia is not blebbed. The gracia is overbold. The gracia click the myrtia. The myrtia is blebbed. The myrtia ruckle the gracia. The myrtia totalize the latrina. The stig is overbold. If someone click the myrtia then they see the gracia. If someone click the gracia then the gracia does not see the latrina. If someone click the latrina and they like the myrtia then the myrtia ruckle the gracia. If the gracia is unseemly then the gracia ruckle the myrtia. If the latrina click the gracia then the gracia does not see the stig. If the stig is unseemly then the stig ruckle the latrina. If someone ruckle the stig then they need the gracia. If someone is overbold and they do not see the latrina then the latrina totalize the myrtia. The myrtia is not blebbed.", "logic": "\nBlebbed(latrina)\nOverbold(latrina)\nnot Estrous(gracia)\nnot Blebbed(gracia)\nOverbold(gracia)\nClick(gracia, myrtia)\nBlebbed(myrtia)\nRuckle(myrtia, gracia)\nTotalize(myrtia, latrina)\nOverbold(stig)\nforall x (Click(x, myrtia) -> Click(x, gracia))\nforall x (Click(x, gracia) -> not Click(gracia, latrina))\nforall x (Click(x, latrina) and Ruckle(x, myrtia) -> Ruckle(myrtia, gracia))\nUnseemly(gracia) -> Ruckle(gracia, myrtia)\nClick(latrina, gracia) -> not Click(gracia, stig)\nUnseemly(stig) -> Ruckle(stig, latrina)\nforall x (Ruckle(x, stig) -> Totalize(x, gracia))\nforall x (Overbold(x) and not Click(x, latrina) -> Totalize(latrina, myrtia))\n\nnot Blebbed(myrtia)\n\ntherefore Blebbed(myrtia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The milton is patronymic. The milton is boskopoid. The editha is not manky. The editha is not patronymic. The editha is boskopoid. The editha comprehend the mahesh. The mahesh is patronymic. The mahesh reclassify the editha. The mahesh sling the milton. The graeme is boskopoid. If someone comprehend the mahesh then they see the editha. If someone comprehend the editha then the editha does not see the milton. If someone comprehend the milton and they like the mahesh then the mahesh reclassify the editha. If the editha is nephritic then the editha reclassify the mahesh. If the milton comprehend the editha then the editha does not see the graeme. If the graeme is nephritic then the graeme reclassify the milton. If someone reclassify the graeme then they need the editha. If someone is boskopoid and they do not see the milton then the milton sling the mahesh. The editha comprehend the editha.", "logic": "\nPatronymic(milton)\nBoskopoid(milton)\nnot Manky(editha)\nnot Patronymic(editha)\nBoskopoid(editha)\nComprehend(editha, mahesh)\nPatronymic(mahesh)\nReclassify(mahesh, editha)\nSling(mahesh, milton)\nBoskopoid(graeme)\nforall x (Comprehend(x, mahesh) -> Comprehend(x, editha))\nforall x (Comprehend(x, editha) -> not Comprehend(editha, milton))\nforall x (Comprehend(x, milton) and Reclassify(x, mahesh) -> Reclassify(mahesh, editha))\nNephritic(editha) -> Reclassify(editha, mahesh)\nComprehend(milton, editha) -> not Comprehend(editha, graeme)\nNephritic(graeme) -> Reclassify(graeme, milton)\nforall x (Reclassify(x, graeme) -> Sling(x, editha))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) and not Comprehend(x, milton) -> Sling(milton, mahesh))\n\nComprehend(editha, editha)\n\nComprehend(editha, mahesh) and forall x (Comprehend(x, mahesh) -> Comprehend(x, editha)) -> therefore Comprehend(editha, editha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The nicolea is tinny. The nicolea is chapfallen. The alanah is not dual. The alanah is not tinny. The alanah is chapfallen. The alanah count the lawrence. The lawrence is tinny. The lawrence acidulate the alanah. The lawrence bitt the nicolea. The carolina is chapfallen. If someone count the lawrence then they see the alanah. If someone count the alanah then the alanah does not see the nicolea. If someone count the nicolea and they like the lawrence then the lawrence acidulate the alanah. If the alanah is lively then the alanah acidulate the lawrence. If the nicolea count the alanah then the alanah does not see the carolina. If the carolina is lively then the carolina acidulate the nicolea. If someone acidulate the carolina then they need the alanah. If someone is chapfallen and they do not see the nicolea then the nicolea bitt the lawrence. The alanah does not see the alanah.", "logic": "\nTinny(nicolea)\nChapfallen(nicolea)\nnot Dual(alanah)\nnot Tinny(alanah)\nChapfallen(alanah)\nCount(alanah, lawrence)\nTinny(lawrence)\nAcidulate(lawrence, alanah)\nBitt(lawrence, nicolea)\nChapfallen(carolina)\nforall x (Count(x, lawrence) -> Count(x, alanah))\nforall x (Count(x, alanah) -> not Count(alanah, nicolea))\nforall x (Count(x, nicolea) and Acidulate(x, lawrence) -> Acidulate(lawrence, alanah))\nLively(alanah) -> Acidulate(alanah, lawrence)\nCount(nicolea, alanah) -> not Count(alanah, carolina)\nLively(carolina) -> Acidulate(carolina, nicolea)\nforall x (Acidulate(x, carolina) -> Bitt(x, alanah))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and not Count(x, nicolea) -> Bitt(nicolea, lawrence))\n\nnot Count(alanah, alanah)\n\nCount(alanah, lawrence) and forall x (Count(x, lawrence) -> Count(x, alanah)) -> therefore Count(alanah, alanah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The nonah is gammy. The nonah is tucked. The rahel is not unarguable. The rahel is not gammy. The rahel is tucked. The rahel accouter the robert. The robert is gammy. The robert second the rahel. The robert fruit the nonah. The channa is tucked. If someone accouter the robert then they see the rahel. If someone accouter the rahel then the rahel does not see the nonah. If someone accouter the nonah and they like the robert then the robert second the rahel. If the rahel is propellent then the rahel second the robert. If the nonah accouter the rahel then the rahel does not see the channa. If the channa is propellent then the channa second the nonah. If someone second the channa then they need the rahel. If someone is tucked and they do not see the nonah then the nonah fruit the robert. The rahel does not see the nonah.", "logic": "\nGammy(nonah)\nTucked(nonah)\nnot Unarguable(rahel)\nnot Gammy(rahel)\nTucked(rahel)\nAccouter(rahel, robert)\nGammy(robert)\nSecond(robert, rahel)\nFruit(robert, nonah)\nTucked(channa)\nforall x (Accouter(x, robert) -> Accouter(x, rahel))\nforall x (Accouter(x, rahel) -> not Accouter(rahel, nonah))\nforall x (Accouter(x, nonah) and Second(x, robert) -> Second(robert, rahel))\nPropellent(rahel) -> Second(rahel, robert)\nAccouter(nonah, rahel) -> not Accouter(rahel, channa)\nPropellent(channa) -> Second(channa, nonah)\nforall x (Second(x, channa) -> Fruit(x, rahel))\nforall x (Tucked(x) and not Accouter(x, nonah) -> Fruit(nonah, robert))\n\nnot Accouter(rahel, nonah)\n\nAccouter(rahel, robert) and forall x (Accouter(x, robert) -> Accouter(x, rahel)) -> therefore Accouter(rahel, rahel) Accouter(rahel, rahel) and forall x (Accouter(x, rahel) -> not Accouter(rahel, nonah)) -> therefore not Accouter(rahel, nonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The marven is tumultuous. The marven is vehement. The reggi is not quechuan. The reggi is not tumultuous. The reggi is vehement. The reggi yacht the tomasina. The tomasina is tumultuous. The tomasina exploit the reggi. The tomasina immunise the marven. The ephrem is vehement. If someone yacht the tomasina then they see the reggi. If someone yacht the reggi then the reggi does not see the marven. If someone yacht the marven and they like the tomasina then the tomasina exploit the reggi. If the reggi is eastern then the reggi exploit the tomasina. If the marven yacht the reggi then the reggi does not see the ephrem. If the ephrem is eastern then the ephrem exploit the marven. If someone exploit the ephrem then they need the reggi. If someone is vehement and they do not see the marven then the marven immunise the tomasina. The reggi yacht the marven.", "logic": "\nTumultuous(marven)\nVehement(marven)\nnot Quechuan(reggi)\nnot Tumultuous(reggi)\nVehement(reggi)\nYacht(reggi, tomasina)\nTumultuous(tomasina)\nExploit(tomasina, reggi)\nImmunise(tomasina, marven)\nVehement(ephrem)\nforall x (Yacht(x, tomasina) -> Yacht(x, reggi))\nforall x (Yacht(x, reggi) -> not Yacht(reggi, marven))\nforall x (Yacht(x, marven) and Exploit(x, tomasina) -> Exploit(tomasina, reggi))\nEastern(reggi) -> Exploit(reggi, tomasina)\nYacht(marven, reggi) -> not Yacht(reggi, ephrem)\nEastern(ephrem) -> Exploit(ephrem, marven)\nforall x (Exploit(x, ephrem) -> Immunise(x, reggi))\nforall x (Vehement(x) and not Yacht(x, marven) -> Immunise(marven, tomasina))\n\nYacht(reggi, marven)\n\nYacht(reggi, tomasina) and forall x (Yacht(x, tomasina) -> Yacht(x, reggi)) -> therefore Yacht(reggi, reggi) Yacht(reggi, reggi) and forall x (Yacht(x, reggi) -> not Yacht(reggi, marven)) -> therefore not Yacht(reggi, marven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The barnabas is anserine. The barnabas is flaunty. The willette is not fissile. The willette is not anserine. The willette is flaunty. The willette start the carolan. The carolan is anserine. The carolan decease the willette. The carolan soundproof the barnabas. The donetta is flaunty. If someone start the carolan then they see the willette. If someone start the willette then the willette does not see the barnabas. If someone start the barnabas and they like the carolan then the carolan decease the willette. If the willette is jade then the willette decease the carolan. If the barnabas start the willette then the willette does not see the donetta. If the donetta is jade then the donetta decease the barnabas. If someone decease the donetta then they need the willette. If someone is flaunty and they do not see the barnabas then the barnabas soundproof the carolan. The barnabas soundproof the carolan.", "logic": "\nAnserine(barnabas)\nFlaunty(barnabas)\nnot Fissile(willette)\nnot Anserine(willette)\nFlaunty(willette)\nStart(willette, carolan)\nAnserine(carolan)\nDecease(carolan, willette)\nSoundproof(carolan, barnabas)\nFlaunty(donetta)\nforall x (Start(x, carolan) -> Start(x, willette))\nforall x (Start(x, willette) -> not Start(willette, barnabas))\nforall x (Start(x, barnabas) and Decease(x, carolan) -> Decease(carolan, willette))\nJade(willette) -> Decease(willette, carolan)\nStart(barnabas, willette) -> not Start(willette, donetta)\nJade(donetta) -> Decease(donetta, barnabas)\nforall x (Decease(x, donetta) -> Soundproof(x, willette))\nforall x (Flaunty(x) and not Start(x, barnabas) -> Soundproof(barnabas, carolan))\n\nSoundproof(barnabas, carolan)\n\nStart(willette, carolan) and forall x (Start(x, carolan) -> Start(x, willette)) -> therefore Start(willette, willette) Start(willette, willette) and forall x (Start(x, willette) -> not Start(willette, barnabas)) -> therefore not Start(willette, barnabas) Flaunty(willette) and not Start(willette, barnabas) and forall x (Flaunty(x) and not Start(x, barnabas) -> Soundproof(barnabas, carolan)) -> therefore Soundproof(barnabas, carolan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The jehu is fraught. The jehu is awry. The maisie is not foldaway. The maisie is not fraught. The maisie is awry. The maisie spoof the norm. The norm is fraught. The norm console the maisie. The norm cannonade the jehu. The alexine is awry. If someone spoof the norm then they see the maisie. If someone spoof the maisie then the maisie does not see the jehu. If someone spoof the jehu and they like the norm then the norm console the maisie. If the maisie is unsmiling then the maisie console the norm. If the jehu spoof the maisie then the maisie does not see the alexine. If the alexine is unsmiling then the alexine console the jehu. If someone console the alexine then they need the maisie. If someone is awry and they do not see the jehu then the jehu cannonade the norm. The jehu does not need the norm.", "logic": "\nFraught(jehu)\nAwry(jehu)\nnot Foldaway(maisie)\nnot Fraught(maisie)\nAwry(maisie)\nSpoof(maisie, norm)\nFraught(norm)\nConsole(norm, maisie)\nCannonade(norm, jehu)\nAwry(alexine)\nforall x (Spoof(x, norm) -> Spoof(x, maisie))\nforall x (Spoof(x, maisie) -> not Spoof(maisie, jehu))\nforall x (Spoof(x, jehu) and Console(x, norm) -> Console(norm, maisie))\nUnsmiling(maisie) -> Console(maisie, norm)\nSpoof(jehu, maisie) -> not Spoof(maisie, alexine)\nUnsmiling(alexine) -> Console(alexine, jehu)\nforall x (Console(x, alexine) -> Cannonade(x, maisie))\nforall x (Awry(x) and not Spoof(x, jehu) -> Cannonade(jehu, norm))\n\nnot Cannonade(jehu, norm)\n\nSpoof(maisie, norm) and forall x (Spoof(x, norm) -> Spoof(x, maisie)) -> therefore Spoof(maisie, maisie) Spoof(maisie, maisie) and forall x (Spoof(x, maisie) -> not Spoof(maisie, jehu)) -> therefore not Spoof(maisie, jehu) Awry(maisie) and not Spoof(maisie, jehu) and forall x (Awry(x) and not Spoof(x, jehu) -> Cannonade(jehu, norm)) -> therefore Cannonade(jehu, norm)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The adara is blameless. The adara is dispensed. The carson is not fazed. The carson is not blameless. The carson is dispensed. The carson splosh the ike. The ike is blameless. The ike snail the carson. The ike blister the adara. The ania is dispensed. If someone splosh the ike then they see the carson. If someone splosh the carson then the carson does not see the adara. If someone splosh the adara and they like the ike then the ike snail the carson. If the carson is outspoken then the carson snail the ike. If the adara splosh the carson then the carson does not see the ania. If the ania is outspoken then the ania snail the adara. If someone snail the ania then they need the carson. If someone is dispensed and they do not see the adara then the adara blister the ike. The ike does not see the carson.", "logic": "\nBlameless(adara)\nDispensed(adara)\nnot Fazed(carson)\nnot Blameless(carson)\nDispensed(carson)\nSplosh(carson, ike)\nBlameless(ike)\nSnail(ike, carson)\nBlister(ike, adara)\nDispensed(ania)\nforall x (Splosh(x, ike) -> Splosh(x, carson))\nforall x (Splosh(x, carson) -> not Splosh(carson, adara))\nforall x (Splosh(x, adara) and Snail(x, ike) -> Snail(ike, carson))\nOutspoken(carson) -> Snail(carson, ike)\nSplosh(adara, carson) -> not Splosh(carson, ania)\nOutspoken(ania) -> Snail(ania, adara)\nforall x (Snail(x, ania) -> Blister(x, carson))\nforall x (Dispensed(x) and not Splosh(x, adara) -> Blister(adara, ike))\n\nnot Splosh(ike, carson)\n\nforall x (Splosh(x, ike) -> Splosh(x, carson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The portia is syllabled. The portia is millionth. The florette is not spirited. The florette is not syllabled. The florette is millionth. The florette coiffe the fanechka. The fanechka is syllabled. The fanechka modify the florette. The fanechka slam the portia. The deloris is millionth. If someone coiffe the fanechka then they see the florette. If someone coiffe the florette then the florette does not see the portia. If someone coiffe the portia and they like the fanechka then the fanechka modify the florette. If the florette is tensional then the florette modify the fanechka. If the portia coiffe the florette then the florette does not see the deloris. If the deloris is tensional then the deloris modify the portia. If someone modify the deloris then they need the florette. If someone is millionth and they do not see the portia then the portia slam the fanechka. The fanechka slam the florette.", "logic": "\nSyllabled(portia)\nMillionth(portia)\nnot Spirited(florette)\nnot Syllabled(florette)\nMillionth(florette)\nCoiffe(florette, fanechka)\nSyllabled(fanechka)\nModify(fanechka, florette)\nSlam(fanechka, portia)\nMillionth(deloris)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, fanechka) -> Coiffe(x, florette))\nforall x (Coiffe(x, florette) -> not Coiffe(florette, portia))\nforall x (Coiffe(x, portia) and Modify(x, fanechka) -> Modify(fanechka, florette))\nTensional(florette) -> Modify(florette, fanechka)\nCoiffe(portia, florette) -> not Coiffe(florette, deloris)\nTensional(deloris) -> Modify(deloris, portia)\nforall x (Modify(x, deloris) -> Slam(x, florette))\nforall x (Millionth(x) and not Coiffe(x, portia) -> Slam(portia, fanechka))\n\nSlam(fanechka, florette)\n\nforall x (Modify(x, deloris) -> Slam(x, florette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The wadsworth is episodic. The wadsworth is flaring. The shayna is not nonracial. The shayna is not episodic. The shayna is flaring. The shayna blackguard the ariel. The ariel is episodic. The ariel piss the shayna. The ariel swab the wadsworth. The cindelyn is flaring. If someone blackguard the ariel then they see the shayna. If someone blackguard the shayna then the shayna does not see the wadsworth. If someone blackguard the wadsworth and they like the ariel then the ariel piss the shayna. If the shayna is stock then the shayna piss the ariel. If the wadsworth blackguard the shayna then the shayna does not see the cindelyn. If the cindelyn is stock then the cindelyn piss the wadsworth. If someone piss the cindelyn then they need the shayna. If someone is flaring and they do not see the wadsworth then the wadsworth swab the ariel. The shayna does not like the ariel.", "logic": "\nEpisodic(wadsworth)\nFlaring(wadsworth)\nnot Nonracial(shayna)\nnot Episodic(shayna)\nFlaring(shayna)\nBlackguard(shayna, ariel)\nEpisodic(ariel)\nPiss(ariel, shayna)\nSwab(ariel, wadsworth)\nFlaring(cindelyn)\nforall x (Blackguard(x, ariel) -> Blackguard(x, shayna))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, shayna) -> not Blackguard(shayna, wadsworth))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, wadsworth) and Piss(x, ariel) -> Piss(ariel, shayna))\nStock(shayna) -> Piss(shayna, ariel)\nBlackguard(wadsworth, shayna) -> not Blackguard(shayna, cindelyn)\nStock(cindelyn) -> Piss(cindelyn, wadsworth)\nforall x (Piss(x, cindelyn) -> Swab(x, shayna))\nforall x (Flaring(x) and not Blackguard(x, wadsworth) -> Swab(wadsworth, ariel))\n\nnot Piss(shayna, ariel)\n\nStock(shayna) -> Piss(shayna, ariel) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The rutger is stubby. The rutger is cheesy. The moises is not roasted. The moises is not stubby. The moises is cheesy. The moises sequence the marven. The marven is stubby. The marven turf the moises. The marven contort the rutger. The madelaine is cheesy. If someone sequence the marven then they see the moises. If someone sequence the moises then the moises does not see the rutger. If someone sequence the rutger and they like the marven then the marven turf the moises. If the moises is atavistic then the moises turf the marven. If the rutger sequence the moises then the moises does not see the madelaine. If the madelaine is atavistic then the madelaine turf the rutger. If someone turf the madelaine then they need the moises. If someone is cheesy and they do not see the rutger then the rutger contort the marven. The madelaine sequence the moises.", "logic": "\nStubby(rutger)\nCheesy(rutger)\nnot Roasted(moises)\nnot Stubby(moises)\nCheesy(moises)\nSequence(moises, marven)\nStubby(marven)\nTurf(marven, moises)\nContort(marven, rutger)\nCheesy(madelaine)\nforall x (Sequence(x, marven) -> Sequence(x, moises))\nforall x (Sequence(x, moises) -> not Sequence(moises, rutger))\nforall x (Sequence(x, rutger) and Turf(x, marven) -> Turf(marven, moises))\nAtavistic(moises) -> Turf(moises, marven)\nSequence(rutger, moises) -> not Sequence(moises, madelaine)\nAtavistic(madelaine) -> Turf(madelaine, rutger)\nforall x (Turf(x, madelaine) -> Contort(x, moises))\nforall x (Cheesy(x) and not Sequence(x, rutger) -> Contort(rutger, marven))\n\nSequence(madelaine, moises)\n\nforall x (Sequence(x, marven) -> Sequence(x, moises)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The haily is arsenious. The haily is expurgated. The pollyanna is not upstage. The pollyanna is not arsenious. The pollyanna is expurgated. The pollyanna resew the dabney. The dabney is arsenious. The dabney immerse the pollyanna. The dabney lose the haily. The carmen is expurgated. If someone resew the dabney then they see the pollyanna. If someone resew the pollyanna then the pollyanna does not see the haily. If someone resew the haily and they like the dabney then the dabney immerse the pollyanna. If the pollyanna is endozoan then the pollyanna immerse the dabney. If the haily resew the pollyanna then the pollyanna does not see the carmen. If the carmen is endozoan then the carmen immerse the haily. If someone immerse the carmen then they need the pollyanna. If someone is expurgated and they do not see the haily then the haily lose the dabney. The haily does not like the dabney.", "logic": "\nArsenious(haily)\nExpurgated(haily)\nnot Upstage(pollyanna)\nnot Arsenious(pollyanna)\nExpurgated(pollyanna)\nResew(pollyanna, dabney)\nArsenious(dabney)\nImmerse(dabney, pollyanna)\nLose(dabney, haily)\nExpurgated(carmen)\nforall x (Resew(x, dabney) -> Resew(x, pollyanna))\nforall x (Resew(x, pollyanna) -> not Resew(pollyanna, haily))\nforall x (Resew(x, haily) and Immerse(x, dabney) -> Immerse(dabney, pollyanna))\nEndozoan(pollyanna) -> Immerse(pollyanna, dabney)\nResew(haily, pollyanna) -> not Resew(pollyanna, carmen)\nEndozoan(carmen) -> Immerse(carmen, haily)\nforall x (Immerse(x, carmen) -> Lose(x, pollyanna))\nforall x (Expurgated(x) and not Resew(x, haily) -> Lose(haily, dabney))\n\nnot Immerse(haily, dabney)\n\nnot Immerse(haily, dabney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The clarette is tired. The clarette is terse. The orsola is not grotty. The orsola is not tired. The orsola is terse. The orsola metricise the geralda. The geralda is tired. The geralda carom the orsola. The geralda cosign the clarette. The farra is terse. If someone metricise the geralda then they see the orsola. If someone metricise the orsola then the orsola does not see the clarette. If someone metricise the clarette and they like the geralda then the geralda carom the orsola. If the orsola is soaked then the orsola carom the geralda. If the clarette metricise the orsola then the orsola does not see the farra. If the farra is soaked then the farra carom the clarette. If someone carom the farra then they need the orsola. If someone is terse and they do not see the clarette then the clarette cosign the geralda. The orsola cosign the geralda.", "logic": "\nTired(clarette)\nTerse(clarette)\nnot Grotty(orsola)\nnot Tired(orsola)\nTerse(orsola)\nMetricise(orsola, geralda)\nTired(geralda)\nCarom(geralda, orsola)\nCosign(geralda, clarette)\nTerse(farra)\nforall x (Metricise(x, geralda) -> Metricise(x, orsola))\nforall x (Metricise(x, orsola) -> not Metricise(orsola, clarette))\nforall x (Metricise(x, clarette) and Carom(x, geralda) -> Carom(geralda, orsola))\nSoaked(orsola) -> Carom(orsola, geralda)\nMetricise(clarette, orsola) -> not Metricise(orsola, farra)\nSoaked(farra) -> Carom(farra, clarette)\nforall x (Carom(x, farra) -> Cosign(x, orsola))\nforall x (Terse(x) and not Metricise(x, clarette) -> Cosign(clarette, geralda))\n\nCosign(orsola, geralda)\n\nCosign(orsola, geralda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The ansell is demotic. The ansell is delineated. The penelopa is not sublime. The penelopa is not demotic. The penelopa is delineated. The penelopa preform the gerhard. The gerhard is demotic. The gerhard renew the penelopa. The gerhard bulldoze the ansell. The adel is delineated. If someone preform the gerhard then they see the penelopa. If someone preform the penelopa then the penelopa does not see the ansell. If someone preform the ansell and they like the gerhard then the gerhard renew the penelopa. If the penelopa is beauteous then the penelopa renew the gerhard. If the ansell preform the penelopa then the penelopa does not see the adel. If the adel is beauteous then the adel renew the ansell. If someone renew the adel then they need the penelopa. If someone is delineated and they do not see the ansell then the ansell bulldoze the gerhard. The adel is not big.", "logic": "\nDemotic(ansell)\nDelineated(ansell)\nnot Sublime(penelopa)\nnot Demotic(penelopa)\nDelineated(penelopa)\nPreform(penelopa, gerhard)\nDemotic(gerhard)\nRenew(gerhard, penelopa)\nBulldoze(gerhard, ansell)\nDelineated(adel)\nforall x (Preform(x, gerhard) -> Preform(x, penelopa))\nforall x (Preform(x, penelopa) -> not Preform(penelopa, ansell))\nforall x (Preform(x, ansell) and Renew(x, gerhard) -> Renew(gerhard, penelopa))\nBeauteous(penelopa) -> Renew(penelopa, gerhard)\nPreform(ansell, penelopa) -> not Preform(penelopa, adel)\nBeauteous(adel) -> Renew(adel, ansell)\nforall x (Renew(x, adel) -> Bulldoze(x, penelopa))\nforall x (Delineated(x) and not Preform(x, ansell) -> Bulldoze(ansell, gerhard))\n\nnot Big(adel)\n\nnot Big(adel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The bella is sintered. The bella is fourscore. The chaunce is not frumpish. The chaunce is not sintered. The chaunce is fourscore. The chaunce line the lynda. The lynda is sintered. The lynda alleviate the chaunce. The lynda blabber the bella. The junina is fourscore. If someone line the lynda then they see the chaunce. If someone line the chaunce then the chaunce does not see the bella. If someone line the bella and they like the lynda then the lynda alleviate the chaunce. If the chaunce is funded then the chaunce alleviate the lynda. If the bella line the chaunce then the chaunce does not see the junina. If the junina is funded then the junina alleviate the bella. If someone alleviate the junina then they need the chaunce. If someone is fourscore and they do not see the bella then the bella blabber the lynda. The junina blabber the bella.", "logic": "\nSintered(bella)\nFourscore(bella)\nnot Frumpish(chaunce)\nnot Sintered(chaunce)\nFourscore(chaunce)\nLine(chaunce, lynda)\nSintered(lynda)\nAlleviate(lynda, chaunce)\nBlabber(lynda, bella)\nFourscore(junina)\nforall x (Line(x, lynda) -> Line(x, chaunce))\nforall x (Line(x, chaunce) -> not Line(chaunce, bella))\nforall x (Line(x, bella) and Alleviate(x, lynda) -> Alleviate(lynda, chaunce))\nFunded(chaunce) -> Alleviate(chaunce, lynda)\nLine(bella, chaunce) -> not Line(chaunce, junina)\nFunded(junina) -> Alleviate(junina, bella)\nforall x (Alleviate(x, junina) -> Blabber(x, chaunce))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and not Line(x, bella) -> Blabber(bella, lynda))\n\nBlabber(junina, bella)\n\nBlabber(junina, bella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The olaf anatomise the almeda. The olaf is ungraceful. The olaf is scrub. The olaf xerox the almeda. The olaf exculpate the hakeem. The olaf exculpate the almeda. The hakeem anatomise the almeda. The hakeem is scrub. The hakeem exculpate the olaf. The almeda is mitotic. The almeda is unsexed. The almeda xerox the olaf. If something xerox the almeda and it is scrub then it is ungraceful. If something xerox the almeda and it anatomise the almeda then the almeda xerox the hakeem. If something anatomise the almeda then it is unsexed. If something exculpate the almeda then the almeda xerox the hakeem. If the hakeem anatomise the olaf then the hakeem xerox the almeda. If the hakeem exculpate the almeda and the almeda exculpate the hakeem then the hakeem is ungraceful. If something xerox the olaf then it exculpate the hakeem. If something is unsexed then it anatomise the olaf. The almeda xerox the olaf.", "logic": "\nAnatomise(olaf, almeda)\nUngraceful(olaf)\nScrub(olaf)\nXerox(olaf, almeda)\nExculpate(olaf, hakeem)\nExculpate(olaf, almeda)\nAnatomise(hakeem, almeda)\nScrub(hakeem)\nExculpate(hakeem, olaf)\nMitotic(almeda)\nUnsexed(almeda)\nXerox(almeda, olaf)\nforall x (Xerox(x, almeda) and Scrub(x) -> Ungraceful(x))\nforall x (Xerox(x, almeda) and Anatomise(x, almeda) -> Xerox(almeda, hakeem))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, almeda) -> Unsexed(x))\nforall x (Exculpate(x, almeda) -> Xerox(almeda, hakeem))\nAnatomise(hakeem, olaf) -> Xerox(hakeem, almeda)\nExculpate(hakeem, almeda) and Exculpate(almeda, hakeem) -> Ungraceful(hakeem)\nforall x (Xerox(x, olaf) -> Exculpate(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Unsexed(x) -> Anatomise(x, olaf))\n\nXerox(almeda, olaf)\n\ntherefore Xerox(almeda, olaf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The syd subtend the caldwell. The syd is statute. The syd is subdural. The syd court the caldwell. The syd mobilise the elmira. The syd mobilise the caldwell. The elmira subtend the caldwell. The elmira is subdural. The elmira mobilise the syd. The caldwell is withered. The caldwell is tapped. The caldwell court the syd. If something court the caldwell and it is subdural then it is statute. If something court the caldwell and it subtend the caldwell then the caldwell court the elmira. If something subtend the caldwell then it is tapped. If something mobilise the caldwell then the caldwell court the elmira. If the elmira subtend the syd then the elmira court the caldwell. If the elmira mobilise the caldwell and the caldwell mobilise the elmira then the elmira is statute. If something court the syd then it mobilise the elmira. If something is tapped then it subtend the syd. The syd is not subdural.", "logic": "\nSubtend(syd, caldwell)\nStatute(syd)\nSubdural(syd)\nCourt(syd, caldwell)\nMobilise(syd, elmira)\nMobilise(syd, caldwell)\nSubtend(elmira, caldwell)\nSubdural(elmira)\nMobilise(elmira, syd)\nWithered(caldwell)\nTapped(caldwell)\nCourt(caldwell, syd)\nforall x (Court(x, caldwell) and Subdural(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Court(x, caldwell) and Subtend(x, caldwell) -> Court(caldwell, elmira))\nforall x (Subtend(x, caldwell) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Mobilise(x, caldwell) -> Court(caldwell, elmira))\nSubtend(elmira, syd) -> Court(elmira, caldwell)\nMobilise(elmira, caldwell) and Mobilise(caldwell, elmira) -> Statute(elmira)\nforall x (Court(x, syd) -> Mobilise(x, elmira))\nforall x (Tapped(x) -> Subtend(x, syd))\n\nnot Subdural(syd)\n\ntherefore Subdural(syd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The fatima demean the frans. The fatima is merry. The fatima is random. The fatima harbour the frans. The fatima rate the spike. The fatima rate the frans. The spike demean the frans. The spike is random. The spike rate the fatima. The frans is echt. The frans is nebulous. The frans harbour the fatima. If something harbour the frans and it is random then it is merry. If something harbour the frans and it demean the frans then the frans harbour the spike. If something demean the frans then it is nebulous. If something rate the frans then the frans harbour the spike. If the spike demean the fatima then the spike harbour the frans. If the spike rate the frans and the frans rate the spike then the spike is merry. If something harbour the fatima then it rate the spike. If something is nebulous then it demean the fatima. The frans harbour the spike.", "logic": "\nDemean(fatima, frans)\nMerry(fatima)\nRandom(fatima)\nHarbour(fatima, frans)\nRate(fatima, spike)\nRate(fatima, frans)\nDemean(spike, frans)\nRandom(spike)\nRate(spike, fatima)\nEcht(frans)\nNebulous(frans)\nHarbour(frans, fatima)\nforall x (Harbour(x, frans) and Random(x) -> Merry(x))\nforall x (Harbour(x, frans) and Demean(x, frans) -> Harbour(frans, spike))\nforall x (Demean(x, frans) -> Nebulous(x))\nforall x (Rate(x, frans) -> Harbour(frans, spike))\nDemean(spike, fatima) -> Harbour(spike, frans)\nRate(spike, frans) and Rate(frans, spike) -> Merry(spike)\nforall x (Harbour(x, fatima) -> Rate(x, spike))\nforall x (Nebulous(x) -> Demean(x, fatima))\n\nHarbour(frans, spike)\n\nRate(fatima, frans) and forall x (Rate(x, frans) -> Harbour(frans, spike)) -> therefore Harbour(frans, spike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The miranda ancylose the roxi. The miranda is greedy. The miranda is underdone. The miranda maneuver the roxi. The miranda whale the carri. The miranda whale the roxi. The carri ancylose the roxi. The carri is underdone. The carri whale the miranda. The roxi is adaptable. The roxi is partizan. The roxi maneuver the miranda. If something maneuver the roxi and it is underdone then it is greedy. If something maneuver the roxi and it ancylose the roxi then the roxi maneuver the carri. If something ancylose the roxi then it is partizan. If something whale the roxi then the roxi maneuver the carri. If the carri ancylose the miranda then the carri maneuver the roxi. If the carri whale the roxi and the roxi whale the carri then the carri is greedy. If something maneuver the miranda then it whale the carri. If something is partizan then it ancylose the miranda. The roxi does not like the carri.", "logic": "\nAncylose(miranda, roxi)\nGreedy(miranda)\nUnderdone(miranda)\nManeuver(miranda, roxi)\nWhale(miranda, carri)\nWhale(miranda, roxi)\nAncylose(carri, roxi)\nUnderdone(carri)\nWhale(carri, miranda)\nAdaptable(roxi)\nPartizan(roxi)\nManeuver(roxi, miranda)\nforall x (Maneuver(x, roxi) and Underdone(x) -> Greedy(x))\nforall x (Maneuver(x, roxi) and Ancylose(x, roxi) -> Maneuver(roxi, carri))\nforall x (Ancylose(x, roxi) -> Partizan(x))\nforall x (Whale(x, roxi) -> Maneuver(roxi, carri))\nAncylose(carri, miranda) -> Maneuver(carri, roxi)\nWhale(carri, roxi) and Whale(roxi, carri) -> Greedy(carri)\nforall x (Maneuver(x, miranda) -> Whale(x, carri))\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> Ancylose(x, miranda))\n\nnot Maneuver(roxi, carri)\n\nWhale(miranda, roxi) and forall x (Whale(x, roxi) -> Maneuver(roxi, carri)) -> therefore Maneuver(roxi, carri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The gavra recuperate the euphemia. The gavra is lilting. The gavra is coroneted. The gavra nominate the euphemia. The gavra shelter the myna. The gavra shelter the euphemia. The myna recuperate the euphemia. The myna is coroneted. The myna shelter the gavra. The euphemia is macho. The euphemia is splayfoot. The euphemia nominate the gavra. If something nominate the euphemia and it is coroneted then it is lilting. If something nominate the euphemia and it recuperate the euphemia then the euphemia nominate the myna. If something recuperate the euphemia then it is splayfoot. If something shelter the euphemia then the euphemia nominate the myna. If the myna recuperate the gavra then the myna nominate the euphemia. If the myna shelter the euphemia and the euphemia shelter the myna then the myna is lilting. If something nominate the gavra then it shelter the myna. If something is splayfoot then it recuperate the gavra. The gavra recuperate the gavra.", "logic": "\nRecuperate(gavra, euphemia)\nLilting(gavra)\nCoroneted(gavra)\nNominate(gavra, euphemia)\nShelter(gavra, myna)\nShelter(gavra, euphemia)\nRecuperate(myna, euphemia)\nCoroneted(myna)\nShelter(myna, gavra)\nMacho(euphemia)\nSplayfoot(euphemia)\nNominate(euphemia, gavra)\nforall x (Nominate(x, euphemia) and Coroneted(x) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Nominate(x, euphemia) and Recuperate(x, euphemia) -> Nominate(euphemia, myna))\nforall x (Recuperate(x, euphemia) -> Splayfoot(x))\nforall x (Shelter(x, euphemia) -> Nominate(euphemia, myna))\nRecuperate(myna, gavra) -> Nominate(myna, euphemia)\nShelter(myna, euphemia) and Shelter(euphemia, myna) -> Lilting(myna)\nforall x (Nominate(x, gavra) -> Shelter(x, myna))\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) -> Recuperate(x, gavra))\n\nRecuperate(gavra, gavra)\n\nRecuperate(gavra, euphemia) and forall x (Recuperate(x, euphemia) -> Splayfoot(x)) -> therefore Splayfoot(gavra) Splayfoot(gavra) and forall x (Splayfoot(x) -> Recuperate(x, gavra)) -> therefore Recuperate(gavra, gavra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The kurt enthrone the nan. The kurt is virucidal. The kurt is jawed. The kurt winterize the nan. The kurt argue the anetta. The kurt argue the nan. The anetta enthrone the nan. The anetta is jawed. The anetta argue the kurt. The nan is cliched. The nan is medium. The nan winterize the kurt. If something winterize the nan and it is jawed then it is virucidal. If something winterize the nan and it enthrone the nan then the nan winterize the anetta. If something enthrone the nan then it is medium. If something argue the nan then the nan winterize the anetta. If the anetta enthrone the kurt then the anetta winterize the nan. If the anetta argue the nan and the nan argue the anetta then the anetta is virucidal. If something winterize the kurt then it argue the anetta. If something is medium then it enthrone the kurt. The anetta does not chase the kurt.", "logic": "\nEnthrone(kurt, nan)\nVirucidal(kurt)\nJawed(kurt)\nWinterize(kurt, nan)\nArgue(kurt, anetta)\nArgue(kurt, nan)\nEnthrone(anetta, nan)\nJawed(anetta)\nArgue(anetta, kurt)\nCliched(nan)\nMedium(nan)\nWinterize(nan, kurt)\nforall x (Winterize(x, nan) and Jawed(x) -> Virucidal(x))\nforall x (Winterize(x, nan) and Enthrone(x, nan) -> Winterize(nan, anetta))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, nan) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Argue(x, nan) -> Winterize(nan, anetta))\nEnthrone(anetta, kurt) -> Winterize(anetta, nan)\nArgue(anetta, nan) and Argue(nan, anetta) -> Virucidal(anetta)\nforall x (Winterize(x, kurt) -> Argue(x, anetta))\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Enthrone(x, kurt))\n\nnot Enthrone(anetta, kurt)\n\nEnthrone(anetta, nan) and forall x (Enthrone(x, nan) -> Medium(x)) -> therefore Medium(anetta) Medium(anetta) and forall x (Medium(x) -> Enthrone(x, kurt)) -> therefore Enthrone(anetta, kurt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The edsel eulogize the otha. The edsel is unwearable. The edsel is skyward. The edsel disquiet the otha. The edsel rout the elberta. The edsel rout the otha. The elberta eulogize the otha. The elberta is skyward. The elberta rout the edsel. The otha is plumy. The otha is long. The otha disquiet the edsel. If something disquiet the otha and it is skyward then it is unwearable. If something disquiet the otha and it eulogize the otha then the otha disquiet the elberta. If something eulogize the otha then it is long. If something rout the otha then the otha disquiet the elberta. If the elberta eulogize the edsel then the elberta disquiet the otha. If the elberta rout the otha and the otha rout the elberta then the elberta is unwearable. If something disquiet the edsel then it rout the elberta. If something is long then it eulogize the edsel. The elberta disquiet the otha.", "logic": "\nEulogize(edsel, otha)\nUnwearable(edsel)\nSkyward(edsel)\nDisquiet(edsel, otha)\nRout(edsel, elberta)\nRout(edsel, otha)\nEulogize(elberta, otha)\nSkyward(elberta)\nRout(elberta, edsel)\nPlumy(otha)\nLong(otha)\nDisquiet(otha, edsel)\nforall x (Disquiet(x, otha) and Skyward(x) -> Unwearable(x))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, otha) and Eulogize(x, otha) -> Disquiet(otha, elberta))\nforall x (Eulogize(x, otha) -> Long(x))\nforall x (Rout(x, otha) -> Disquiet(otha, elberta))\nEulogize(elberta, edsel) -> Disquiet(elberta, otha)\nRout(elberta, otha) and Rout(otha, elberta) -> Unwearable(elberta)\nforall x (Disquiet(x, edsel) -> Rout(x, elberta))\nforall x (Long(x) -> Eulogize(x, edsel))\n\nDisquiet(elberta, otha)\n\nEulogize(elberta, otha) and forall x (Eulogize(x, otha) -> Long(x)) -> therefore Long(elberta) Long(elberta) and forall x (Long(x) -> Eulogize(x, edsel)) -> therefore Eulogize(elberta, edsel) Eulogize(elberta, edsel) and Eulogize(elberta, edsel) -> Disquiet(elberta, otha) -> therefore Disquiet(elberta, otha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The myrna airt the karil. The myrna is favorite. The myrna is tickling. The myrna support the karil. The myrna maintain the alys. The myrna maintain the karil. The alys airt the karil. The alys is tickling. The alys maintain the myrna. The karil is unexpected. The karil is jerking. The karil support the myrna. If something support the karil and it is tickling then it is favorite. If something support the karil and it airt the karil then the karil support the alys. If something airt the karil then it is jerking. If something maintain the karil then the karil support the alys. If the alys airt the myrna then the alys support the karil. If the alys maintain the karil and the karil maintain the alys then the alys is favorite. If something support the myrna then it maintain the alys. If something is jerking then it airt the myrna. The alys does not like the karil.", "logic": "\nAirt(myrna, karil)\nFavorite(myrna)\nTickling(myrna)\nSupport(myrna, karil)\nMaintain(myrna, alys)\nMaintain(myrna, karil)\nAirt(alys, karil)\nTickling(alys)\nMaintain(alys, myrna)\nUnexpected(karil)\nJerking(karil)\nSupport(karil, myrna)\nforall x (Support(x, karil) and Tickling(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Support(x, karil) and Airt(x, karil) -> Support(karil, alys))\nforall x (Airt(x, karil) -> Jerking(x))\nforall x (Maintain(x, karil) -> Support(karil, alys))\nAirt(alys, myrna) -> Support(alys, karil)\nMaintain(alys, karil) and Maintain(karil, alys) -> Favorite(alys)\nforall x (Support(x, myrna) -> Maintain(x, alys))\nforall x (Jerking(x) -> Airt(x, myrna))\n\nnot Support(alys, karil)\n\nAirt(alys, karil) and forall x (Airt(x, karil) -> Jerking(x)) -> therefore Jerking(alys) Jerking(alys) and forall x (Jerking(x) -> Airt(x, myrna)) -> therefore Airt(alys, myrna) Airt(alys, myrna) and Airt(alys, myrna) -> Support(alys, karil) -> therefore Support(alys, karil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The connor stew the idell. The connor is jungian. The connor is nineteenth. The connor stopper the idell. The connor paginate the shantee. The connor paginate the idell. The shantee stew the idell. The shantee is nineteenth. The shantee paginate the connor. The idell is unreleased. The idell is manic. The idell stopper the connor. If something stopper the idell and it is nineteenth then it is jungian. If something stopper the idell and it stew the idell then the idell stopper the shantee. If something stew the idell then it is manic. If something paginate the idell then the idell stopper the shantee. If the shantee stew the connor then the shantee stopper the idell. If the shantee paginate the idell and the idell paginate the shantee then the shantee is jungian. If something stopper the connor then it paginate the shantee. If something is manic then it stew the connor. The idell is not jungian.", "logic": "\nStew(connor, idell)\nJungian(connor)\nNineteenth(connor)\nStopper(connor, idell)\nPaginate(connor, shantee)\nPaginate(connor, idell)\nStew(shantee, idell)\nNineteenth(shantee)\nPaginate(shantee, connor)\nUnreleased(idell)\nManic(idell)\nStopper(idell, connor)\nforall x (Stopper(x, idell) and Nineteenth(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Stopper(x, idell) and Stew(x, idell) -> Stopper(idell, shantee))\nforall x (Stew(x, idell) -> Manic(x))\nforall x (Paginate(x, idell) -> Stopper(idell, shantee))\nStew(shantee, connor) -> Stopper(shantee, idell)\nPaginate(shantee, idell) and Paginate(idell, shantee) -> Jungian(shantee)\nforall x (Stopper(x, connor) -> Paginate(x, shantee))\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Stew(x, connor))\n\nnot Jungian(idell)\n\nforall x (Stopper(x, idell) and Nineteenth(x) -> Jungian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The miguel suffix the wilbur. The miguel is token. The miguel is germfree. The miguel rubbish the wilbur. The miguel declaw the darrell. The miguel declaw the wilbur. The darrell suffix the wilbur. The darrell is germfree. The darrell declaw the miguel. The wilbur is ariose. The wilbur is azotemic. The wilbur rubbish the miguel. If something rubbish the wilbur and it is germfree then it is token. If something rubbish the wilbur and it suffix the wilbur then the wilbur rubbish the darrell. If something suffix the wilbur then it is azotemic. If something declaw the wilbur then the wilbur rubbish the darrell. If the darrell suffix the miguel then the darrell rubbish the wilbur. If the darrell declaw the wilbur and the wilbur declaw the darrell then the darrell is token. If something rubbish the miguel then it declaw the darrell. If something is azotemic then it suffix the miguel. The darrell declaw the darrell.", "logic": "\nSuffix(miguel, wilbur)\nToken(miguel)\nGermfree(miguel)\nRubbish(miguel, wilbur)\nDeclaw(miguel, darrell)\nDeclaw(miguel, wilbur)\nSuffix(darrell, wilbur)\nGermfree(darrell)\nDeclaw(darrell, miguel)\nAriose(wilbur)\nAzotemic(wilbur)\nRubbish(wilbur, miguel)\nforall x (Rubbish(x, wilbur) and Germfree(x) -> Token(x))\nforall x (Rubbish(x, wilbur) and Suffix(x, wilbur) -> Rubbish(wilbur, darrell))\nforall x (Suffix(x, wilbur) -> Azotemic(x))\nforall x (Declaw(x, wilbur) -> Rubbish(wilbur, darrell))\nSuffix(darrell, miguel) -> Rubbish(darrell, wilbur)\nDeclaw(darrell, wilbur) and Declaw(wilbur, darrell) -> Token(darrell)\nforall x (Rubbish(x, miguel) -> Declaw(x, darrell))\nforall x (Azotemic(x) -> Suffix(x, miguel))\n\nDeclaw(darrell, darrell)\n\nforall x (Rubbish(x, miguel) -> Declaw(x, darrell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The gayleen squander the leeann. The gayleen is vixenish. The gayleen is catarrhal. The gayleen cream the leeann. The gayleen facsimile the caroleen. The gayleen facsimile the leeann. The caroleen squander the leeann. The caroleen is catarrhal. The caroleen facsimile the gayleen. The leeann is strapping. The leeann is distracted. The leeann cream the gayleen. If something cream the leeann and it is catarrhal then it is vixenish. If something cream the leeann and it squander the leeann then the leeann cream the caroleen. If something squander the leeann then it is distracted. If something facsimile the leeann then the leeann cream the caroleen. If the caroleen squander the gayleen then the caroleen cream the leeann. If the caroleen facsimile the leeann and the leeann facsimile the caroleen then the caroleen is vixenish. If something cream the gayleen then it facsimile the caroleen. If something is distracted then it squander the gayleen. The gayleen does not chase the caroleen.", "logic": "\nSquander(gayleen, leeann)\nVixenish(gayleen)\nCatarrhal(gayleen)\nCream(gayleen, leeann)\nFacsimile(gayleen, caroleen)\nFacsimile(gayleen, leeann)\nSquander(caroleen, leeann)\nCatarrhal(caroleen)\nFacsimile(caroleen, gayleen)\nStrapping(leeann)\nDistracted(leeann)\nCream(leeann, gayleen)\nforall x (Cream(x, leeann) and Catarrhal(x) -> Vixenish(x))\nforall x (Cream(x, leeann) and Squander(x, leeann) -> Cream(leeann, caroleen))\nforall x (Squander(x, leeann) -> Distracted(x))\nforall x (Facsimile(x, leeann) -> Cream(leeann, caroleen))\nSquander(caroleen, gayleen) -> Cream(caroleen, leeann)\nFacsimile(caroleen, leeann) and Facsimile(leeann, caroleen) -> Vixenish(caroleen)\nforall x (Cream(x, gayleen) -> Facsimile(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Distracted(x) -> Squander(x, gayleen))\n\nnot Squander(gayleen, caroleen)\n\nnot Squander(gayleen, caroleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The enid reline the joli. The enid is jaded. The enid is pomaded. The enid curtain the joli. The enid forfeit the cecile. The enid forfeit the joli. The cecile reline the joli. The cecile is pomaded. The cecile forfeit the enid. The joli is slighting. The joli is utter. The joli curtain the enid. If something curtain the joli and it is pomaded then it is jaded. If something curtain the joli and it reline the joli then the joli curtain the cecile. If something reline the joli then it is utter. If something forfeit the joli then the joli curtain the cecile. If the cecile reline the enid then the cecile curtain the joli. If the cecile forfeit the joli and the joli forfeit the cecile then the cecile is jaded. If something curtain the enid then it forfeit the cecile. If something is utter then it reline the enid. The joli reline the joli.", "logic": "\nReline(enid, joli)\nJaded(enid)\nPomaded(enid)\nCurtain(enid, joli)\nForfeit(enid, cecile)\nForfeit(enid, joli)\nReline(cecile, joli)\nPomaded(cecile)\nForfeit(cecile, enid)\nSlighting(joli)\nUtter(joli)\nCurtain(joli, enid)\nforall x (Curtain(x, joli) and Pomaded(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Curtain(x, joli) and Reline(x, joli) -> Curtain(joli, cecile))\nforall x (Reline(x, joli) -> Utter(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x, joli) -> Curtain(joli, cecile))\nReline(cecile, enid) -> Curtain(cecile, joli)\nForfeit(cecile, joli) and Forfeit(joli, cecile) -> Jaded(cecile)\nforall x (Curtain(x, enid) -> Forfeit(x, cecile))\nforall x (Utter(x) -> Reline(x, enid))\n\nReline(joli, joli)\n\nReline(joli, joli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The virgina sibilate the wilmer. The virgina is female. The virgina is unsolved. The virgina itemize the wilmer. The virgina cartoon the laureen. The virgina cartoon the wilmer. The laureen sibilate the wilmer. The laureen is unsolved. The laureen cartoon the virgina. The wilmer is varied. The wilmer is homegrown. The wilmer itemize the virgina. If something itemize the wilmer and it is unsolved then it is female. If something itemize the wilmer and it sibilate the wilmer then the wilmer itemize the laureen. If something sibilate the wilmer then it is homegrown. If something cartoon the wilmer then the wilmer itemize the laureen. If the laureen sibilate the virgina then the laureen itemize the wilmer. If the laureen cartoon the wilmer and the wilmer cartoon the laureen then the laureen is female. If something itemize the virgina then it cartoon the laureen. If something is homegrown then it sibilate the virgina. The virgina is not red.", "logic": "\nSibilate(virgina, wilmer)\nFemale(virgina)\nUnsolved(virgina)\nItemize(virgina, wilmer)\nCartoon(virgina, laureen)\nCartoon(virgina, wilmer)\nSibilate(laureen, wilmer)\nUnsolved(laureen)\nCartoon(laureen, virgina)\nVaried(wilmer)\nHomegrown(wilmer)\nItemize(wilmer, virgina)\nforall x (Itemize(x, wilmer) and Unsolved(x) -> Female(x))\nforall x (Itemize(x, wilmer) and Sibilate(x, wilmer) -> Itemize(wilmer, laureen))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, wilmer) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Cartoon(x, wilmer) -> Itemize(wilmer, laureen))\nSibilate(laureen, virgina) -> Itemize(laureen, wilmer)\nCartoon(laureen, wilmer) and Cartoon(wilmer, laureen) -> Female(laureen)\nforall x (Itemize(x, virgina) -> Cartoon(x, laureen))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) -> Sibilate(x, virgina))\n\nnot Red(virgina)\n\nnot Red(virgina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The joyous culture the ximenes. The joyous is belittled. The joyous is sprouted. The joyous chaw the ximenes. The joyous venerate the silvio. The joyous venerate the ximenes. The silvio culture the ximenes. The silvio is sprouted. The silvio venerate the joyous. The ximenes is gilled. The ximenes is nonskid. The ximenes chaw the joyous. If something chaw the ximenes and it is sprouted then it is belittled. If something chaw the ximenes and it culture the ximenes then the ximenes chaw the silvio. If something culture the ximenes then it is nonskid. If something venerate the ximenes then the ximenes chaw the silvio. If the silvio culture the joyous then the silvio chaw the ximenes. If the silvio venerate the ximenes and the ximenes venerate the silvio then the silvio is belittled. If something chaw the joyous then it venerate the silvio. If something is nonskid then it culture the joyous. The ximenes is red.", "logic": "\nCulture(joyous, ximenes)\nBelittled(joyous)\nSprouted(joyous)\nChaw(joyous, ximenes)\nVenerate(joyous, silvio)\nVenerate(joyous, ximenes)\nCulture(silvio, ximenes)\nSprouted(silvio)\nVenerate(silvio, joyous)\nGilled(ximenes)\nNonskid(ximenes)\nChaw(ximenes, joyous)\nforall x (Chaw(x, ximenes) and Sprouted(x) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Chaw(x, ximenes) and Culture(x, ximenes) -> Chaw(ximenes, silvio))\nforall x (Culture(x, ximenes) -> Nonskid(x))\nforall x (Venerate(x, ximenes) -> Chaw(ximenes, silvio))\nCulture(silvio, joyous) -> Chaw(silvio, ximenes)\nVenerate(silvio, ximenes) and Venerate(ximenes, silvio) -> Belittled(silvio)\nforall x (Chaw(x, joyous) -> Venerate(x, silvio))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Culture(x, joyous))\n\nRed(ximenes)\n\nRed(ximenes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The plato entomb the osbert. The plato is queenly. The plato is analytic. The plato converge the osbert. The plato daunt the deonne. The plato daunt the osbert. The deonne entomb the osbert. The deonne is analytic. The deonne daunt the plato. The osbert is puppylike. The osbert is adamantine. The osbert converge the plato. If something converge the osbert and it is analytic then it is queenly. If something converge the osbert and it entomb the osbert then the osbert converge the deonne. If something entomb the osbert then it is adamantine. If something daunt the osbert then the osbert converge the deonne. If the deonne entomb the plato then the deonne converge the osbert. If the deonne daunt the osbert and the osbert daunt the deonne then the deonne is queenly. If something converge the plato then it daunt the deonne. If something is adamantine then it entomb the plato. The plato does not see the plato.", "logic": "\nEntomb(plato, osbert)\nQueenly(plato)\nAnalytic(plato)\nConverge(plato, osbert)\nDaunt(plato, deonne)\nDaunt(plato, osbert)\nEntomb(deonne, osbert)\nAnalytic(deonne)\nDaunt(deonne, plato)\nPuppylike(osbert)\nAdamantine(osbert)\nConverge(osbert, plato)\nforall x (Converge(x, osbert) and Analytic(x) -> Queenly(x))\nforall x (Converge(x, osbert) and Entomb(x, osbert) -> Converge(osbert, deonne))\nforall x (Entomb(x, osbert) -> Adamantine(x))\nforall x (Daunt(x, osbert) -> Converge(osbert, deonne))\nEntomb(deonne, plato) -> Converge(deonne, osbert)\nDaunt(deonne, osbert) and Daunt(osbert, deonne) -> Queenly(deonne)\nforall x (Converge(x, plato) -> Daunt(x, deonne))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Entomb(x, plato))\n\nnot Daunt(plato, plato)\n\nnot Daunt(plato, plato) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The nerita venesect the rycca. The nerita is unread. The nerita is denatured. The nerita elate the rycca. The nerita compromise the neilla. The nerita compromise the rycca. The neilla venesect the rycca. The neilla is denatured. The neilla compromise the nerita. The rycca is chartless. The rycca is hirsute. The rycca elate the nerita. If something elate the rycca and it is denatured then it is unread. If something elate the rycca and it venesect the rycca then the rycca elate the neilla. If something venesect the rycca then it is hirsute. If something compromise the rycca then the rycca elate the neilla. If the neilla venesect the nerita then the neilla elate the rycca. If the neilla compromise the rycca and the rycca compromise the neilla then the neilla is unread. If something elate the nerita then it compromise the neilla. If something is hirsute then it venesect the nerita. The nerita elate the neilla.", "logic": "\nVenesect(nerita, rycca)\nUnread(nerita)\nDenatured(nerita)\nElate(nerita, rycca)\nCompromise(nerita, neilla)\nCompromise(nerita, rycca)\nVenesect(neilla, rycca)\nDenatured(neilla)\nCompromise(neilla, nerita)\nChartless(rycca)\nHirsute(rycca)\nElate(rycca, nerita)\nforall x (Elate(x, rycca) and Denatured(x) -> Unread(x))\nforall x (Elate(x, rycca) and Venesect(x, rycca) -> Elate(rycca, neilla))\nforall x (Venesect(x, rycca) -> Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Compromise(x, rycca) -> Elate(rycca, neilla))\nVenesect(neilla, nerita) -> Elate(neilla, rycca)\nCompromise(neilla, rycca) and Compromise(rycca, neilla) -> Unread(neilla)\nforall x (Elate(x, nerita) -> Compromise(x, neilla))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) -> Venesect(x, nerita))\n\nElate(nerita, neilla)\n\nElate(nerita, neilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Madelene is atonal. Burton is not glistering. Faustina is chatty. Rivi is not pesky. If Burton is referable then Burton is chatty. Smart things are not referable. Kind things are beatified. All beatified things are gravelly. All chatty things are glistering. If something is referable and not chatty then it is glistering. Burton is not glistering.", "logic": "\nAtonal(madelene)\nnot Glistering(burton)\nChatty(faustina)\nnot Pesky(rivi)\nReferable(burton) -> Chatty(burton)\nforall x (Pesky(x) -> not Referable(x))\nforall x (Glistering(x) -> Beatified(x))\nforall x (Beatified(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Glistering(x))\nforall x (Referable(x) and not Chatty(x) -> Glistering(x))\n\nnot Glistering(burton)\n\ntherefore not Glistering(burton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Kimmo is humanistic. Filip is not girlish. Juliet is clawlike. Rebecca is not lawful. If Filip is slivery then Filip is clawlike. Smart things are not slivery. Kind things are abactinal. All abactinal things are cerise. All clawlike things are girlish. If something is slivery and not clawlike then it is girlish. Juliet is not clawlike.", "logic": "\nHumanistic(kimmo)\nnot Girlish(filip)\nClawlike(juliet)\nnot Lawful(rebecca)\nSlivery(filip) -> Clawlike(filip)\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> not Slivery(x))\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Abactinal(x) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) -> Girlish(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) and not Clawlike(x) -> Girlish(x))\n\nnot Clawlike(juliet)\n\ntherefore Clawlike(juliet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Adriena is bats. Donald is not sybaritic. Eyde is healed. Phylys is not toothless. If Donald is gauntleted then Donald is healed. Smart things are not gauntleted. Kind things are vigorous. All vigorous things are acquired. All healed things are sybaritic. If something is gauntleted and not healed then it is sybaritic. Eyde is sybaritic.", "logic": "\nBats(adriena)\nnot Sybaritic(donald)\nHealed(eyde)\nnot Toothless(phylys)\nGauntleted(donald) -> Healed(donald)\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> not Gauntleted(x))\nforall x (Sybaritic(x) -> Vigorous(x))\nforall x (Vigorous(x) -> Acquired(x))\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Sybaritic(x))\nforall x (Gauntleted(x) and not Healed(x) -> Sybaritic(x))\n\nSybaritic(eyde)\n\nHealed(eyde) and forall x (Healed(x) -> Sybaritic(x)) -> therefore Sybaritic(eyde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Brier is raftered. Fletch is not fried. Min is raisable. Myna is not wrong. If Fletch is anurous then Fletch is raisable. Smart things are not anurous. Kind things are planted. All planted things are groomed. All raisable things are fried. If something is anurous and not raisable then it is fried. Min is not fried.", "logic": "\nRaftered(brier)\nnot Fried(fletch)\nRaisable(min)\nnot Wrong(myna)\nAnurous(fletch) -> Raisable(fletch)\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> not Anurous(x))\nforall x (Fried(x) -> Planted(x))\nforall x (Planted(x) -> Groomed(x))\nforall x (Raisable(x) -> Fried(x))\nforall x (Anurous(x) and not Raisable(x) -> Fried(x))\n\nnot Fried(min)\n\nRaisable(min) and forall x (Raisable(x) -> Fried(x)) -> therefore Fried(min)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Corly is fimbriate. Anna is not ratable. Rudolf is direful. Valentin is not bacchantic. If Anna is booted then Anna is direful. Smart things are not booted. Kind things are suppliant. All suppliant things are derisive. All direful things are ratable. If something is booted and not direful then it is ratable. Rudolf is suppliant.", "logic": "\nFimbriate(corly)\nnot Ratable(anna)\nDireful(rudolf)\nnot Bacchantic(valentin)\nBooted(anna) -> Direful(anna)\nforall x (Bacchantic(x) -> not Booted(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> Suppliant(x))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Derisive(x))\nforall x (Direful(x) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) and not Direful(x) -> Ratable(x))\n\nSuppliant(rudolf)\n\nDireful(rudolf) and forall x (Direful(x) -> Ratable(x)) -> therefore Ratable(rudolf) Ratable(rudolf) and forall x (Ratable(x) -> Suppliant(x)) -> therefore Suppliant(rudolf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Ernesto is ribald. Hector is not tartaric. Weslie is duple. Dwaine is not incursive. If Hector is combed then Hector is duple. Smart things are not combed. Kind things are unadapted. All unadapted things are yeatsian. All duple things are tartaric. If something is combed and not duple then it is tartaric. Weslie is not unadapted.", "logic": "\nRibald(ernesto)\nnot Tartaric(hector)\nDuple(weslie)\nnot Incursive(dwaine)\nCombed(hector) -> Duple(hector)\nforall x (Incursive(x) -> not Combed(x))\nforall x (Tartaric(x) -> Unadapted(x))\nforall x (Unadapted(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Duple(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nforall x (Combed(x) and not Duple(x) -> Tartaric(x))\n\nnot Unadapted(weslie)\n\nDuple(weslie) and forall x (Duple(x) -> Tartaric(x)) -> therefore Tartaric(weslie) Tartaric(weslie) and forall x (Tartaric(x) -> Unadapted(x)) -> therefore Unadapted(weslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Edith is social. Ashely is not braggy. Chryste is nourishing. Ambrosi is not shortish. If Ashely is skillful then Ashely is nourishing. Smart things are not skillful. Kind things are demagogic. All demagogic things are corruptive. All nourishing things are braggy. If something is skillful and not nourishing then it is braggy. Chryste is corruptive.", "logic": "\nSocial(edith)\nnot Braggy(ashely)\nNourishing(chryste)\nnot Shortish(ambrosi)\nSkillful(ashely) -> Nourishing(ashely)\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> not Skillful(x))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Corruptive(x))\nforall x (Nourishing(x) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Skillful(x) and not Nourishing(x) -> Braggy(x))\n\nCorruptive(chryste)\n\nNourishing(chryste) and forall x (Nourishing(x) -> Braggy(x)) -> therefore Braggy(chryste) Braggy(chryste) and forall x (Braggy(x) -> Demagogic(x)) -> therefore Demagogic(chryste) Demagogic(chryste) and forall x (Demagogic(x) -> Corruptive(x)) -> therefore Corruptive(chryste)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Rab is sunset. Wye is not wavy. Demetrius is localized. Stoddard is not befitting. If Wye is bisontine then Wye is localized. Smart things are not bisontine. Kind things are hypnotic. All hypnotic things are polyphonic. All localized things are wavy. If something is bisontine and not localized then it is wavy. Demetrius is not polyphonic.", "logic": "\nSunset(rab)\nnot Wavy(wye)\nLocalized(demetrius)\nnot Befitting(stoddard)\nBisontine(wye) -> Localized(wye)\nforall x (Befitting(x) -> not Bisontine(x))\nforall x (Wavy(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\nforall x (Localized(x) -> Wavy(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) and not Localized(x) -> Wavy(x))\n\nnot Polyphonic(demetrius)\n\nLocalized(demetrius) and forall x (Localized(x) -> Wavy(x)) -> therefore Wavy(demetrius) Wavy(demetrius) and forall x (Wavy(x) -> Hypnotic(x)) -> therefore Hypnotic(demetrius) Hypnotic(demetrius) and forall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Polyphonic(x)) -> therefore Polyphonic(demetrius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Tuck is breezy. Carma is not auxetic. Marla is suasible. Frannie is not petty. If Carma is prandial then Carma is suasible. Smart things are not prandial. Kind things are dutiable. All dutiable things are deaf. All suasible things are auxetic. If something is prandial and not suasible then it is auxetic. Frannie is not dutiable.", "logic": "\nBreezy(tuck)\nnot Auxetic(carma)\nSuasible(marla)\nnot Petty(frannie)\nPrandial(carma) -> Suasible(carma)\nforall x (Petty(x) -> not Prandial(x))\nforall x (Auxetic(x) -> Dutiable(x))\nforall x (Dutiable(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Suasible(x) -> Auxetic(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) and not Suasible(x) -> Auxetic(x))\n\nnot Dutiable(frannie)\n\nforall x (Auxetic(x) -> Dutiable(x)) <- forall x (Suasible(x) -> Auxetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Lockwood is unexampled. Clemence is not darkling. Inglebert is unexceeded. Adah is not normative. If Clemence is iridaceous then Clemence is unexceeded. Smart things are not iridaceous. Kind things are boolean. All boolean things are lancinate. All unexceeded things are darkling. If something is iridaceous and not unexceeded then it is darkling. Adah is darkling.", "logic": "\nUnexampled(lockwood)\nnot Darkling(clemence)\nUnexceeded(inglebert)\nnot Normative(adah)\nIridaceous(clemence) -> Unexceeded(clemence)\nforall x (Normative(x) -> not Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Darkling(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Boolean(x) -> Lancinate(x))\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Darkling(x))\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) and not Unexceeded(x) -> Darkling(x))\n\nDarkling(adah)\n\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Darkling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Dell is hertzian. Stacie is not binate. Lusa is pellucid. Joao is not uneducated. If Stacie is cuboid then Stacie is pellucid. Smart things are not cuboid. Kind things are zionist. All zionist things are isocyclic. All pellucid things are binate. If something is cuboid and not pellucid then it is binate. Joao is not isocyclic.", "logic": "\nHertzian(dell)\nnot Binate(stacie)\nPellucid(lusa)\nnot Uneducated(joao)\nCuboid(stacie) -> Pellucid(stacie)\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> not Cuboid(x))\nforall x (Binate(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) -> Binate(x))\nforall x (Cuboid(x) and not Pellucid(x) -> Binate(x))\n\nnot Isocyclic(joao)\n\nforall x (Zionist(x) -> Isocyclic(x)) <- forall x (Binate(x) -> Zionist(x)) <- forall x (Pellucid(x) -> Binate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Benni is censurable. Bunny is not collected. Johnna is brassy. Christine is not falsetto. If Bunny is birchen then Bunny is brassy. Smart things are not birchen. Kind things are conversant. All conversant things are dressed. All brassy things are collected. If something is birchen and not brassy then it is collected. Bunny is dressed.", "logic": "\nCensurable(benni)\nnot Collected(bunny)\nBrassy(johnna)\nnot Falsetto(christine)\nBirchen(bunny) -> Brassy(bunny)\nforall x (Falsetto(x) -> not Birchen(x))\nforall x (Collected(x) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Conversant(x) -> Dressed(x))\nforall x (Brassy(x) -> Collected(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) and not Brassy(x) -> Collected(x))\n\nDressed(bunny)\n\nforall x (Conversant(x) -> Dressed(x)) <- forall x (Collected(x) -> Conversant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Hirsch is fistulate. Tiffani is not productive. Nerta is pharisaic. Noble is not rousing. If Tiffani is motiveless then Tiffani is pharisaic. Smart things are not motiveless. Kind things are photogenic. All photogenic things are redbrick. All pharisaic things are productive. If something is motiveless and not pharisaic then it is productive. Hirsch is not motiveless.", "logic": "\nFistulate(hirsch)\nnot Productive(tiffani)\nPharisaic(nerta)\nnot Rousing(noble)\nMotiveless(tiffani) -> Pharisaic(tiffani)\nforall x (Rousing(x) -> not Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Productive(x) -> Photogenic(x))\nforall x (Photogenic(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Productive(x))\nforall x (Motiveless(x) and not Pharisaic(x) -> Productive(x))\n\nnot Motiveless(hirsch)\n\nnot Motiveless(hirsch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Eydie is wonky. Charmian is not likeable. Parker is slangy. Lynett is not slovenly. If Charmian is awnless then Charmian is slangy. Smart things are not awnless. Kind things are sunlit. All sunlit things are tyrannical. All slangy things are likeable. If something is awnless and not slangy then it is likeable. Charmian is wonky.", "logic": "\nWonky(eydie)\nnot Likeable(charmian)\nSlangy(parker)\nnot Slovenly(lynett)\nAwnless(charmian) -> Slangy(charmian)\nforall x (Slovenly(x) -> not Awnless(x))\nforall x (Likeable(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\nforall x (Slangy(x) -> Likeable(x))\nforall x (Awnless(x) and not Slangy(x) -> Likeable(x))\n\nWonky(charmian)\n\nWonky(charmian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Phylys is impelled. Blancha is not tomentous. Geralda is iritic. Freddy is not pilotless. If Blancha is neotenic then Blancha is iritic. Smart things are not neotenic. Kind things are discontent. All discontent things are ribbonlike. All iritic things are tomentous. If something is neotenic and not iritic then it is tomentous. Blancha is not neotenic.", "logic": "\nImpelled(phylys)\nnot Tomentous(blancha)\nIritic(geralda)\nnot Pilotless(freddy)\nNeotenic(blancha) -> Iritic(blancha)\nforall x (Pilotless(x) -> not Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Discontent(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Ribbonlike(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) and not Iritic(x) -> Tomentous(x))\n\nnot Neotenic(blancha)\n\nnot Neotenic(blancha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Cate is aerial. Andriette is not bashful. Eveline is odorless. Aurilia is not nicaraguan. If Andriette is strangled then Andriette is odorless. Smart things are not strangled. Kind things are septicemic. All septicemic things are barehanded. All odorless things are bashful. If something is strangled and not odorless then it is bashful. Eveline is strangled.", "logic": "\nAerial(cate)\nnot Bashful(andriette)\nOdorless(eveline)\nnot Nicaraguan(aurilia)\nStrangled(andriette) -> Odorless(andriette)\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> not Strangled(x))\nforall x (Bashful(x) -> Septicemic(x))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) and not Odorless(x) -> Bashful(x))\n\nStrangled(eveline)\n\nStrangled(eveline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "The christean is ptolemaic. The christean is achy. The priscilla convalesce the mirilla. The priscilla convalesce the dianna. The mirilla does not eat the priscilla. The mirilla iodise the dianna. The mirilla is ptolemaic. The mirilla convalesce the christean. The mirilla convalesce the dianna. The dianna iodise the mirilla. The dianna is copacetic. The dianna roar the christean. If someone convalesce the christean and they do not eat the christean then they like the priscilla. If the mirilla convalesce the priscilla and the priscilla is ptolemaic then the priscilla is not copacetic. If someone iodise the priscilla then they are ptolemaic. If someone roar the christean then they are not ptolemaic. If someone is chanted then they need the priscilla. If someone convalesce the mirilla then they are not chanted. If the priscilla is not chanted then the priscilla does not like the dianna. If someone convalesce the dianna and they do not like the dianna then they do not eat the mirilla. The dianna is copacetic.", "logic": "\nPtolemaic(christean)\nAchy(christean)\nConvalesce(priscilla, mirilla)\nConvalesce(priscilla, dianna)\nnot Iodise(mirilla, priscilla)\nIodise(mirilla, dianna)\nPtolemaic(mirilla)\nConvalesce(mirilla, christean)\nConvalesce(mirilla, dianna)\nIodise(dianna, mirilla)\nCopacetic(dianna)\nRoar(dianna, christean)\nforall x (Convalesce(x, christean) and not Iodise(x, christean) -> Roar(x, priscilla))\nConvalesce(mirilla, priscilla) and Ptolemaic(priscilla) -> not Copacetic(priscilla)\nforall x (Iodise(x, priscilla) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Roar(x, christean) -> not Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Convalesce(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Convalesce(x, mirilla) -> not Chanted(x))\nnot Chanted(priscilla) -> not Roar(priscilla, dianna)\nforall x (Convalesce(x, dianna) and not Roar(x, dianna) -> not Iodise(x, mirilla))\n\nCopacetic(dianna)\n\ntherefore Copacetic(dianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The nero is hooved. The nero is nonstick. The laurent cuss the isobel. The laurent cuss the terza. The isobel does not eat the laurent. The isobel foresee the terza. The isobel is hooved. The isobel cuss the nero. The isobel cuss the terza. The terza foresee the isobel. The terza is inductive. The terza convoke the nero. If someone cuss the nero and they do not eat the nero then they like the laurent. If the isobel cuss the laurent and the laurent is hooved then the laurent is not inductive. If someone foresee the laurent then they are hooved. If someone convoke the nero then they are not hooved. If someone is bilabial then they need the laurent. If someone cuss the isobel then they are not bilabial. If the laurent is not bilabial then the laurent does not like the terza. If someone cuss the terza and they do not like the terza then they do not eat the isobel. The laurent does not need the terza.", "logic": "\nHooved(nero)\nNonstick(nero)\nCuss(laurent, isobel)\nCuss(laurent, terza)\nnot Foresee(isobel, laurent)\nForesee(isobel, terza)\nHooved(isobel)\nCuss(isobel, nero)\nCuss(isobel, terza)\nForesee(terza, isobel)\nInductive(terza)\nConvoke(terza, nero)\nforall x (Cuss(x, nero) and not Foresee(x, nero) -> Convoke(x, laurent))\nCuss(isobel, laurent) and Hooved(laurent) -> not Inductive(laurent)\nforall x (Foresee(x, laurent) -> Hooved(x))\nforall x (Convoke(x, nero) -> not Hooved(x))\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Cuss(x, laurent))\nforall x (Cuss(x, isobel) -> not Bilabial(x))\nnot Bilabial(laurent) -> not Convoke(laurent, terza)\nforall x (Cuss(x, terza) and not Convoke(x, terza) -> not Foresee(x, isobel))\n\nnot Cuss(laurent, terza)\n\ntherefore Cuss(laurent, terza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The jereme is asocial. The jereme is fringed. The charin proffer the rodie. The charin proffer the priscilla. The rodie does not eat the charin. The rodie paragraph the priscilla. The rodie is asocial. The rodie proffer the jereme. The rodie proffer the priscilla. The priscilla paragraph the rodie. The priscilla is weakly. The priscilla blat the jereme. If someone proffer the jereme and they do not eat the jereme then they like the charin. If the rodie proffer the charin and the charin is asocial then the charin is not weakly. If someone paragraph the charin then they are asocial. If someone blat the jereme then they are not asocial. If someone is alterable then they need the charin. If someone proffer the rodie then they are not alterable. If the charin is not alterable then the charin does not like the priscilla. If someone proffer the priscilla and they do not like the priscilla then they do not eat the rodie. The charin is not alterable.", "logic": "\nAsocial(jereme)\nFringed(jereme)\nProffer(charin, rodie)\nProffer(charin, priscilla)\nnot Paragraph(rodie, charin)\nParagraph(rodie, priscilla)\nAsocial(rodie)\nProffer(rodie, jereme)\nProffer(rodie, priscilla)\nParagraph(priscilla, rodie)\nWeakly(priscilla)\nBlat(priscilla, jereme)\nforall x (Proffer(x, jereme) and not Paragraph(x, jereme) -> Blat(x, charin))\nProffer(rodie, charin) and Asocial(charin) -> not Weakly(charin)\nforall x (Paragraph(x, charin) -> Asocial(x))\nforall x (Blat(x, jereme) -> not Asocial(x))\nforall x (Alterable(x) -> Proffer(x, charin))\nforall x (Proffer(x, rodie) -> not Alterable(x))\nnot Alterable(charin) -> not Blat(charin, priscilla)\nforall x (Proffer(x, priscilla) and not Blat(x, priscilla) -> not Paragraph(x, rodie))\n\nnot Alterable(charin)\n\nProffer(charin, rodie) and forall x (Proffer(x, rodie) -> not Alterable(x)) -> therefore not Alterable(charin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The aziz is cervine. The aziz is rugged. The brandie incite the andreana. The brandie incite the bobine. The andreana does not eat the brandie. The andreana compete the bobine. The andreana is cervine. The andreana incite the aziz. The andreana incite the bobine. The bobine compete the andreana. The bobine is riskless. The bobine quiet the aziz. If someone incite the aziz and they do not eat the aziz then they like the brandie. If the andreana incite the brandie and the brandie is cervine then the brandie is not riskless. If someone compete the brandie then they are cervine. If someone quiet the aziz then they are not cervine. If someone is posterior then they need the brandie. If someone incite the andreana then they are not posterior. If the brandie is not posterior then the brandie does not like the bobine. If someone incite the bobine and they do not like the bobine then they do not eat the andreana. The bobine is cervine.", "logic": "\nCervine(aziz)\nRugged(aziz)\nIncite(brandie, andreana)\nIncite(brandie, bobine)\nnot Compete(andreana, brandie)\nCompete(andreana, bobine)\nCervine(andreana)\nIncite(andreana, aziz)\nIncite(andreana, bobine)\nCompete(bobine, andreana)\nRiskless(bobine)\nQuiet(bobine, aziz)\nforall x (Incite(x, aziz) and not Compete(x, aziz) -> Quiet(x, brandie))\nIncite(andreana, brandie) and Cervine(brandie) -> not Riskless(brandie)\nforall x (Compete(x, brandie) -> Cervine(x))\nforall x (Quiet(x, aziz) -> not Cervine(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Incite(x, brandie))\nforall x (Incite(x, andreana) -> not Posterior(x))\nnot Posterior(brandie) -> not Quiet(brandie, bobine)\nforall x (Incite(x, bobine) and not Quiet(x, bobine) -> not Compete(x, andreana))\n\nCervine(bobine)\n\nQuiet(bobine, aziz) and forall x (Quiet(x, aziz) -> not Cervine(x)) -> therefore not Cervine(bobine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The joela is rosaceous. The joela is unsanitary. The emmeline outmode the brendan. The emmeline outmode the ritchie. The brendan does not eat the emmeline. The brendan carbonize the ritchie. The brendan is rosaceous. The brendan outmode the joela. The brendan outmode the ritchie. The ritchie carbonize the brendan. The ritchie is chinchy. The ritchie nictitate the joela. If someone outmode the joela and they do not eat the joela then they like the emmeline. If the brendan outmode the emmeline and the emmeline is rosaceous then the emmeline is not chinchy. If someone carbonize the emmeline then they are rosaceous. If someone nictitate the joela then they are not rosaceous. If someone is surefooted then they need the emmeline. If someone outmode the brendan then they are not surefooted. If the emmeline is not surefooted then the emmeline does not like the ritchie. If someone outmode the ritchie and they do not like the ritchie then they do not eat the brendan. The emmeline does not like the ritchie.", "logic": "\nRosaceous(joela)\nUnsanitary(joela)\nOutmode(emmeline, brendan)\nOutmode(emmeline, ritchie)\nnot Carbonize(brendan, emmeline)\nCarbonize(brendan, ritchie)\nRosaceous(brendan)\nOutmode(brendan, joela)\nOutmode(brendan, ritchie)\nCarbonize(ritchie, brendan)\nChinchy(ritchie)\nNictitate(ritchie, joela)\nforall x (Outmode(x, joela) and not Carbonize(x, joela) -> Nictitate(x, emmeline))\nOutmode(brendan, emmeline) and Rosaceous(emmeline) -> not Chinchy(emmeline)\nforall x (Carbonize(x, emmeline) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Nictitate(x, joela) -> not Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Surefooted(x) -> Outmode(x, emmeline))\nforall x (Outmode(x, brendan) -> not Surefooted(x))\nnot Surefooted(emmeline) -> not Nictitate(emmeline, ritchie)\nforall x (Outmode(x, ritchie) and not Nictitate(x, ritchie) -> not Carbonize(x, brendan))\n\nnot Nictitate(emmeline, ritchie)\n\nOutmode(emmeline, brendan) and forall x (Outmode(x, brendan) -> not Surefooted(x)) -> therefore not Surefooted(emmeline) not Surefooted(emmeline) and not Surefooted(emmeline) -> not Nictitate(emmeline, ritchie) -> therefore not Nictitate(emmeline, ritchie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The noach is groveling. The noach is achromous. The kipp sprout the francis. The kipp sprout the hagan. The francis does not eat the kipp. The francis stifle the hagan. The francis is groveling. The francis sprout the noach. The francis sprout the hagan. The hagan stifle the francis. The hagan is unframed. The hagan outdo the noach. If someone sprout the noach and they do not eat the noach then they like the kipp. If the francis sprout the kipp and the kipp is groveling then the kipp is not unframed. If someone stifle the kipp then they are groveling. If someone outdo the noach then they are not groveling. If someone is predictive then they need the kipp. If someone sprout the francis then they are not predictive. If the kipp is not predictive then the kipp does not like the hagan. If someone sprout the hagan and they do not like the hagan then they do not eat the francis. The kipp outdo the hagan.", "logic": "\nGroveling(noach)\nAchromous(noach)\nSprout(kipp, francis)\nSprout(kipp, hagan)\nnot Stifle(francis, kipp)\nStifle(francis, hagan)\nGroveling(francis)\nSprout(francis, noach)\nSprout(francis, hagan)\nStifle(hagan, francis)\nUnframed(hagan)\nOutdo(hagan, noach)\nforall x (Sprout(x, noach) and not Stifle(x, noach) -> Outdo(x, kipp))\nSprout(francis, kipp) and Groveling(kipp) -> not Unframed(kipp)\nforall x (Stifle(x, kipp) -> Groveling(x))\nforall x (Outdo(x, noach) -> not Groveling(x))\nforall x (Predictive(x) -> Sprout(x, kipp))\nforall x (Sprout(x, francis) -> not Predictive(x))\nnot Predictive(kipp) -> not Outdo(kipp, hagan)\nforall x (Sprout(x, hagan) and not Outdo(x, hagan) -> not Stifle(x, francis))\n\nOutdo(kipp, hagan)\n\nSprout(kipp, francis) and forall x (Sprout(x, francis) -> not Predictive(x)) -> therefore not Predictive(kipp) not Predictive(kipp) and not Predictive(kipp) -> not Outdo(kipp, hagan) -> therefore not Outdo(kipp, hagan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The ivan is pickled. The ivan is dermal. The carrissa chant the sidney. The carrissa chant the kellia. The sidney does not eat the carrissa. The sidney formulate the kellia. The sidney is pickled. The sidney chant the ivan. The sidney chant the kellia. The kellia formulate the sidney. The kellia is alkaloidal. The kellia saber the ivan. If someone chant the ivan and they do not eat the ivan then they like the carrissa. If the sidney chant the carrissa and the carrissa is pickled then the carrissa is not alkaloidal. If someone formulate the carrissa then they are pickled. If someone saber the ivan then they are not pickled. If someone is capacitive then they need the carrissa. If someone chant the sidney then they are not capacitive. If the carrissa is not capacitive then the carrissa does not like the kellia. If someone chant the kellia and they do not like the kellia then they do not eat the sidney. The carrissa does not eat the sidney.", "logic": "\nPickled(ivan)\nDermal(ivan)\nChant(carrissa, sidney)\nChant(carrissa, kellia)\nnot Formulate(sidney, carrissa)\nFormulate(sidney, kellia)\nPickled(sidney)\nChant(sidney, ivan)\nChant(sidney, kellia)\nFormulate(kellia, sidney)\nAlkaloidal(kellia)\nSaber(kellia, ivan)\nforall x (Chant(x, ivan) and not Formulate(x, ivan) -> Saber(x, carrissa))\nChant(sidney, carrissa) and Pickled(carrissa) -> not Alkaloidal(carrissa)\nforall x (Formulate(x, carrissa) -> Pickled(x))\nforall x (Saber(x, ivan) -> not Pickled(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) -> Chant(x, carrissa))\nforall x (Chant(x, sidney) -> not Capacitive(x))\nnot Capacitive(carrissa) -> not Saber(carrissa, kellia)\nforall x (Chant(x, kellia) and not Saber(x, kellia) -> not Formulate(x, sidney))\n\nnot Formulate(carrissa, sidney)\n\nChant(carrissa, sidney) and forall x (Chant(x, sidney) -> not Capacitive(x)) -> therefore not Capacitive(carrissa) not Capacitive(carrissa) and not Capacitive(carrissa) -> not Saber(carrissa, kellia) -> therefore not Saber(carrissa, kellia) Chant(carrissa, kellia) and not Saber(carrissa, kellia) and forall x (Chant(x, kellia) and not Saber(x, kellia) -> not Formulate(x, sidney)) -> therefore not Formulate(carrissa, sidney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The paddie is cyprinoid. The paddie is stock. The norwood desire the willow. The norwood desire the conchita. The willow does not eat the norwood. The willow overlie the conchita. The willow is cyprinoid. The willow desire the paddie. The willow desire the conchita. The conchita overlie the willow. The conchita is highbrow. The conchita barricado the paddie. If someone desire the paddie and they do not eat the paddie then they like the norwood. If the willow desire the norwood and the norwood is cyprinoid then the norwood is not highbrow. If someone overlie the norwood then they are cyprinoid. If someone barricado the paddie then they are not cyprinoid. If someone is untellable then they need the norwood. If someone desire the willow then they are not untellable. If the norwood is not untellable then the norwood does not like the conchita. If someone desire the conchita and they do not like the conchita then they do not eat the willow. The norwood overlie the willow.", "logic": "\nCyprinoid(paddie)\nStock(paddie)\nDesire(norwood, willow)\nDesire(norwood, conchita)\nnot Overlie(willow, norwood)\nOverlie(willow, conchita)\nCyprinoid(willow)\nDesire(willow, paddie)\nDesire(willow, conchita)\nOverlie(conchita, willow)\nHighbrow(conchita)\nBarricado(conchita, paddie)\nforall x (Desire(x, paddie) and not Overlie(x, paddie) -> Barricado(x, norwood))\nDesire(willow, norwood) and Cyprinoid(norwood) -> not Highbrow(norwood)\nforall x (Overlie(x, norwood) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Barricado(x, paddie) -> not Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> Desire(x, norwood))\nforall x (Desire(x, willow) -> not Untellable(x))\nnot Untellable(norwood) -> not Barricado(norwood, conchita)\nforall x (Desire(x, conchita) and not Barricado(x, conchita) -> not Overlie(x, willow))\n\nOverlie(norwood, willow)\n\nDesire(norwood, willow) and forall x (Desire(x, willow) -> not Untellable(x)) -> therefore not Untellable(norwood) not Untellable(norwood) and not Untellable(norwood) -> not Barricado(norwood, conchita) -> therefore not Barricado(norwood, conchita) Desire(norwood, conchita) and not Barricado(norwood, conchita) and forall x (Desire(x, conchita) and not Barricado(x, conchita) -> not Overlie(x, willow)) -> therefore not Overlie(norwood, willow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The darline is revolved. The darline is mutilated. The valeria canal the quinton. The valeria canal the silas. The quinton does not eat the valeria. The quinton start the silas. The quinton is revolved. The quinton canal the darline. The quinton canal the silas. The silas start the quinton. The silas is zenithal. The silas darn the darline. If someone canal the darline and they do not eat the darline then they like the valeria. If the quinton canal the valeria and the valeria is revolved then the valeria is not zenithal. If someone start the valeria then they are revolved. If someone darn the darline then they are not revolved. If someone is britannic then they need the valeria. If someone canal the quinton then they are not britannic. If the valeria is not britannic then the valeria does not like the silas. If someone canal the silas and they do not like the silas then they do not eat the quinton. The darline does not need the valeria.", "logic": "\nRevolved(darline)\nMutilated(darline)\nCanal(valeria, quinton)\nCanal(valeria, silas)\nnot Start(quinton, valeria)\nStart(quinton, silas)\nRevolved(quinton)\nCanal(quinton, darline)\nCanal(quinton, silas)\nStart(silas, quinton)\nZenithal(silas)\nDarn(silas, darline)\nforall x (Canal(x, darline) and not Start(x, darline) -> Darn(x, valeria))\nCanal(quinton, valeria) and Revolved(valeria) -> not Zenithal(valeria)\nforall x (Start(x, valeria) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Darn(x, darline) -> not Revolved(x))\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Canal(x, valeria))\nforall x (Canal(x, quinton) -> not Britannic(x))\nnot Britannic(valeria) -> not Darn(valeria, silas)\nforall x (Canal(x, silas) and not Darn(x, silas) -> not Start(x, quinton))\n\nnot Canal(darline, valeria)\n\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Canal(x, valeria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The gladi is bicornuate. The gladi is overblown. The sigmund relay the dolley. The sigmund relay the joaquin. The dolley does not eat the sigmund. The dolley confront the joaquin. The dolley is bicornuate. The dolley relay the gladi. The dolley relay the joaquin. The joaquin confront the dolley. The joaquin is prophetic. The joaquin bombard the gladi. If someone relay the gladi and they do not eat the gladi then they like the sigmund. If the dolley relay the sigmund and the sigmund is bicornuate then the sigmund is not prophetic. If someone confront the sigmund then they are bicornuate. If someone bombard the gladi then they are not bicornuate. If someone is aspirant then they need the sigmund. If someone relay the dolley then they are not aspirant. If the sigmund is not aspirant then the sigmund does not like the joaquin. If someone relay the joaquin and they do not like the joaquin then they do not eat the dolley. The dolley bombard the sigmund.", "logic": "\nBicornuate(gladi)\nOverblown(gladi)\nRelay(sigmund, dolley)\nRelay(sigmund, joaquin)\nnot Confront(dolley, sigmund)\nConfront(dolley, joaquin)\nBicornuate(dolley)\nRelay(dolley, gladi)\nRelay(dolley, joaquin)\nConfront(joaquin, dolley)\nProphetic(joaquin)\nBombard(joaquin, gladi)\nforall x (Relay(x, gladi) and not Confront(x, gladi) -> Bombard(x, sigmund))\nRelay(dolley, sigmund) and Bicornuate(sigmund) -> not Prophetic(sigmund)\nforall x (Confront(x, sigmund) -> Bicornuate(x))\nforall x (Bombard(x, gladi) -> not Bicornuate(x))\nforall x (Aspirant(x) -> Relay(x, sigmund))\nforall x (Relay(x, dolley) -> not Aspirant(x))\nnot Aspirant(sigmund) -> not Bombard(sigmund, joaquin)\nforall x (Relay(x, joaquin) and not Bombard(x, joaquin) -> not Confront(x, dolley))\n\nBombard(dolley, sigmund)\n\nforall x (Relay(x, gladi) and not Confront(x, gladi) -> Bombard(x, sigmund)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The derek is anomalous. The derek is ectozoan. The alvira tumesce the juliette. The alvira tumesce the zonnya. The juliette does not eat the alvira. The juliette entrance the zonnya. The juliette is anomalous. The juliette tumesce the derek. The juliette tumesce the zonnya. The zonnya entrance the juliette. The zonnya is libertine. The zonnya mentor the derek. If someone tumesce the derek and they do not eat the derek then they like the alvira. If the juliette tumesce the alvira and the alvira is anomalous then the alvira is not libertine. If someone entrance the alvira then they are anomalous. If someone mentor the derek then they are not anomalous. If someone is jaunty then they need the alvira. If someone tumesce the juliette then they are not jaunty. If the alvira is not jaunty then the alvira does not like the zonnya. If someone tumesce the zonnya and they do not like the zonnya then they do not eat the juliette. The zonnya does not like the alvira.", "logic": "\nAnomalous(derek)\nEctozoan(derek)\nTumesce(alvira, juliette)\nTumesce(alvira, zonnya)\nnot Entrance(juliette, alvira)\nEntrance(juliette, zonnya)\nAnomalous(juliette)\nTumesce(juliette, derek)\nTumesce(juliette, zonnya)\nEntrance(zonnya, juliette)\nLibertine(zonnya)\nMentor(zonnya, derek)\nforall x (Tumesce(x, derek) and not Entrance(x, derek) -> Mentor(x, alvira))\nTumesce(juliette, alvira) and Anomalous(alvira) -> not Libertine(alvira)\nforall x (Entrance(x, alvira) -> Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Mentor(x, derek) -> not Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Jaunty(x) -> Tumesce(x, alvira))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, juliette) -> not Jaunty(x))\nnot Jaunty(alvira) -> not Mentor(alvira, zonnya)\nforall x (Tumesce(x, zonnya) and not Mentor(x, zonnya) -> not Entrance(x, juliette))\n\nnot Mentor(zonnya, alvira)\n\nforall x (Tumesce(x, derek) and not Entrance(x, derek) -> Mentor(x, alvira)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The jaquelyn is transfixed. The jaquelyn is liturgical. The kare incense the chelsea. The kare incense the meier. The chelsea does not eat the kare. The chelsea malinger the meier. The chelsea is transfixed. The chelsea incense the jaquelyn. The chelsea incense the meier. The meier malinger the chelsea. The meier is lovelorn. The meier prawn the jaquelyn. If someone incense the jaquelyn and they do not eat the jaquelyn then they like the kare. If the chelsea incense the kare and the kare is transfixed then the kare is not lovelorn. If someone malinger the kare then they are transfixed. If someone prawn the jaquelyn then they are not transfixed. If someone is besprent then they need the kare. If someone incense the chelsea then they are not besprent. If the kare is not besprent then the kare does not like the meier. If someone incense the meier and they do not like the meier then they do not eat the chelsea. The kare is transfixed.", "logic": "\nTransfixed(jaquelyn)\nLiturgical(jaquelyn)\nIncense(kare, chelsea)\nIncense(kare, meier)\nnot Malinger(chelsea, kare)\nMalinger(chelsea, meier)\nTransfixed(chelsea)\nIncense(chelsea, jaquelyn)\nIncense(chelsea, meier)\nMalinger(meier, chelsea)\nLovelorn(meier)\nPrawn(meier, jaquelyn)\nforall x (Incense(x, jaquelyn) and not Malinger(x, jaquelyn) -> Prawn(x, kare))\nIncense(chelsea, kare) and Transfixed(kare) -> not Lovelorn(kare)\nforall x (Malinger(x, kare) -> Transfixed(x))\nforall x (Prawn(x, jaquelyn) -> not Transfixed(x))\nforall x (Besprent(x) -> Incense(x, kare))\nforall x (Incense(x, chelsea) -> not Besprent(x))\nnot Besprent(kare) -> not Prawn(kare, meier)\nforall x (Incense(x, meier) and not Prawn(x, meier) -> not Malinger(x, chelsea))\n\nTransfixed(kare)\n\nforall x (Malinger(x, kare) -> Transfixed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The west is unforceful. The west is spongelike. The clarke accoutre the royce. The clarke accoutre the armond. The royce does not eat the clarke. The royce fast the armond. The royce is unforceful. The royce accoutre the west. The royce accoutre the armond. The armond fast the royce. The armond is basinal. The armond illustrate the west. If someone accoutre the west and they do not eat the west then they like the clarke. If the royce accoutre the clarke and the clarke is unforceful then the clarke is not basinal. If someone fast the clarke then they are unforceful. If someone illustrate the west then they are not unforceful. If someone is unservile then they need the clarke. If someone accoutre the royce then they are not unservile. If the clarke is not unservile then the clarke does not like the armond. If someone accoutre the armond and they do not like the armond then they do not eat the royce. The west does not like the armond.", "logic": "\nUnforceful(west)\nSpongelike(west)\nAccoutre(clarke, royce)\nAccoutre(clarke, armond)\nnot Fast(royce, clarke)\nFast(royce, armond)\nUnforceful(royce)\nAccoutre(royce, west)\nAccoutre(royce, armond)\nFast(armond, royce)\nBasinal(armond)\nIllustrate(armond, west)\nforall x (Accoutre(x, west) and not Fast(x, west) -> Illustrate(x, clarke))\nAccoutre(royce, clarke) and Unforceful(clarke) -> not Basinal(clarke)\nforall x (Fast(x, clarke) -> Unforceful(x))\nforall x (Illustrate(x, west) -> not Unforceful(x))\nforall x (Unservile(x) -> Accoutre(x, clarke))\nforall x (Accoutre(x, royce) -> not Unservile(x))\nnot Unservile(clarke) -> not Illustrate(clarke, armond)\nforall x (Accoutre(x, armond) and not Illustrate(x, armond) -> not Fast(x, royce))\n\nnot Illustrate(west, armond)\n\nnot Illustrate(west, armond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The lorelei is monoploid. The lorelei is ersatz. The josy smear the rosabel. The josy smear the skylar. The rosabel does not eat the josy. The rosabel kick the skylar. The rosabel is monoploid. The rosabel smear the lorelei. The rosabel smear the skylar. The skylar kick the rosabel. The skylar is correlate. The skylar kneel the lorelei. If someone smear the lorelei and they do not eat the lorelei then they like the josy. If the rosabel smear the josy and the josy is monoploid then the josy is not correlate. If someone kick the josy then they are monoploid. If someone kneel the lorelei then they are not monoploid. If someone is atlantic then they need the josy. If someone smear the rosabel then they are not atlantic. If the josy is not atlantic then the josy does not like the skylar. If someone smear the skylar and they do not like the skylar then they do not eat the rosabel. The rosabel is correlate.", "logic": "\nMonoploid(lorelei)\nErsatz(lorelei)\nSmear(josy, rosabel)\nSmear(josy, skylar)\nnot Kick(rosabel, josy)\nKick(rosabel, skylar)\nMonoploid(rosabel)\nSmear(rosabel, lorelei)\nSmear(rosabel, skylar)\nKick(skylar, rosabel)\nCorrelate(skylar)\nKneel(skylar, lorelei)\nforall x (Smear(x, lorelei) and not Kick(x, lorelei) -> Kneel(x, josy))\nSmear(rosabel, josy) and Monoploid(josy) -> not Correlate(josy)\nforall x (Kick(x, josy) -> Monoploid(x))\nforall x (Kneel(x, lorelei) -> not Monoploid(x))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Smear(x, josy))\nforall x (Smear(x, rosabel) -> not Atlantic(x))\nnot Atlantic(josy) -> not Kneel(josy, skylar)\nforall x (Smear(x, skylar) and not Kneel(x, skylar) -> not Kick(x, rosabel))\n\nCorrelate(rosabel)\n\nCorrelate(rosabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The godart is surgical. The godart is deferent. The everett unravel the wit. The everett unravel the kristina. The wit does not eat the everett. The wit dogmatize the kristina. The wit is surgical. The wit unravel the godart. The wit unravel the kristina. The kristina dogmatize the wit. The kristina is ordinary. The kristina clew the godart. If someone unravel the godart and they do not eat the godart then they like the everett. If the wit unravel the everett and the everett is surgical then the everett is not ordinary. If someone dogmatize the everett then they are surgical. If someone clew the godart then they are not surgical. If someone is towheaded then they need the everett. If someone unravel the wit then they are not towheaded. If the everett is not towheaded then the everett does not like the kristina. If someone unravel the kristina and they do not like the kristina then they do not eat the wit. The wit is not green.", "logic": "\nSurgical(godart)\nDeferent(godart)\nUnravel(everett, wit)\nUnravel(everett, kristina)\nnot Dogmatize(wit, everett)\nDogmatize(wit, kristina)\nSurgical(wit)\nUnravel(wit, godart)\nUnravel(wit, kristina)\nDogmatize(kristina, wit)\nOrdinary(kristina)\nClew(kristina, godart)\nforall x (Unravel(x, godart) and not Dogmatize(x, godart) -> Clew(x, everett))\nUnravel(wit, everett) and Surgical(everett) -> not Ordinary(everett)\nforall x (Dogmatize(x, everett) -> Surgical(x))\nforall x (Clew(x, godart) -> not Surgical(x))\nforall x (Towheaded(x) -> Unravel(x, everett))\nforall x (Unravel(x, wit) -> not Towheaded(x))\nnot Towheaded(everett) -> not Clew(everett, kristina)\nforall x (Unravel(x, kristina) and not Clew(x, kristina) -> not Dogmatize(x, wit))\n\nnot Green(wit)\n\nnot Green(wit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The ham is islamic. The ham is watercress. The milzie intrigue the edsel. The milzie intrigue the hadleigh. The edsel does not eat the milzie. The edsel cronk the hadleigh. The edsel is islamic. The edsel intrigue the ham. The edsel intrigue the hadleigh. The hadleigh cronk the edsel. The hadleigh is disorderly. The hadleigh jeopardize the ham. If someone intrigue the ham and they do not eat the ham then they like the milzie. If the edsel intrigue the milzie and the milzie is islamic then the milzie is not disorderly. If someone cronk the milzie then they are islamic. If someone jeopardize the ham then they are not islamic. If someone is semisweet then they need the milzie. If someone intrigue the edsel then they are not semisweet. If the milzie is not semisweet then the milzie does not like the hadleigh. If someone intrigue the hadleigh and they do not like the hadleigh then they do not eat the edsel. The edsel is semisweet.", "logic": "\nIslamic(ham)\nWatercress(ham)\nIntrigue(milzie, edsel)\nIntrigue(milzie, hadleigh)\nnot Cronk(edsel, milzie)\nCronk(edsel, hadleigh)\nIslamic(edsel)\nIntrigue(edsel, ham)\nIntrigue(edsel, hadleigh)\nCronk(hadleigh, edsel)\nDisorderly(hadleigh)\nJeopardize(hadleigh, ham)\nforall x (Intrigue(x, ham) and not Cronk(x, ham) -> Jeopardize(x, milzie))\nIntrigue(edsel, milzie) and Islamic(milzie) -> not Disorderly(milzie)\nforall x (Cronk(x, milzie) -> Islamic(x))\nforall x (Jeopardize(x, ham) -> not Islamic(x))\nforall x (Semisweet(x) -> Intrigue(x, milzie))\nforall x (Intrigue(x, edsel) -> not Semisweet(x))\nnot Semisweet(milzie) -> not Jeopardize(milzie, hadleigh)\nforall x (Intrigue(x, hadleigh) and not Jeopardize(x, hadleigh) -> not Cronk(x, edsel))\n\nSemisweet(edsel)\n\nSemisweet(edsel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "Sig is assurgent. Sig is nidifugous. Tiffani is armlike. Tiffani is assurgent. Tiffani is jaunty. Tiffani is cyclonical. Tiffani is transpolar. Tiffani is nidifugous. Tiffani is contralto. Arnold is armlike. Arnold is assurgent. Arnold is jaunty. Arnold is cyclonical. Arnold is transpolar. Arnold is nidifugous. Arnold is contralto. If Tiffani is armlike then Tiffani is assurgent. All nidifugous, jaunty things are armlike. If something is assurgent and transpolar then it is contralto. All jaunty things are transpolar. If something is contralto then it is transpolar. If something is assurgent and nidifugous then it is jaunty. All cyclonical, armlike things are transpolar. Round things are jaunty. Tiffani is assurgent.", "logic": "\nAssurgent(sig)\nNidifugous(sig)\nArmlike(tiffani)\nAssurgent(tiffani)\nJaunty(tiffani)\nCyclonical(tiffani)\nTranspolar(tiffani)\nNidifugous(tiffani)\nContralto(tiffani)\nArmlike(arnold)\nAssurgent(arnold)\nJaunty(arnold)\nCyclonical(arnold)\nTranspolar(arnold)\nNidifugous(arnold)\nContralto(arnold)\nArmlike(tiffani) -> Assurgent(tiffani)\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) and Jaunty(x) -> Armlike(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Contralto(x))\nforall x (Jaunty(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Contralto(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) and Nidifugous(x) -> Jaunty(x))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) and Armlike(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Contralto(x) -> Jaunty(x))\n\nAssurgent(tiffani)\n\ntherefore Assurgent(tiffani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Reilly is blushful. Reilly is sandpapery. Cristie is null. Cristie is blushful. Cristie is thinned. Cristie is oxonian. Cristie is curvey. Cristie is sandpapery. Cristie is acicular. Amabel is null. Amabel is blushful. Amabel is thinned. Amabel is oxonian. Amabel is curvey. Amabel is sandpapery. Amabel is acicular. If Cristie is null then Cristie is blushful. All sandpapery, thinned things are null. If something is blushful and curvey then it is acicular. All thinned things are curvey. If something is acicular then it is curvey. If something is blushful and sandpapery then it is thinned. All oxonian, null things are curvey. Round things are thinned. Cristie is not blushful.", "logic": "\nBlushful(reilly)\nSandpapery(reilly)\nNull(cristie)\nBlushful(cristie)\nThinned(cristie)\nOxonian(cristie)\nCurvey(cristie)\nSandpapery(cristie)\nAcicular(cristie)\nNull(amabel)\nBlushful(amabel)\nThinned(amabel)\nOxonian(amabel)\nCurvey(amabel)\nSandpapery(amabel)\nAcicular(amabel)\nNull(cristie) -> Blushful(cristie)\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Thinned(x) -> Null(x))\nforall x (Blushful(x) and Curvey(x) -> Acicular(x))\nforall x (Thinned(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Acicular(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Blushful(x) and Sandpapery(x) -> Thinned(x))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) and Null(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Acicular(x) -> Thinned(x))\n\nnot Blushful(cristie)\n\ntherefore Blushful(cristie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Tess is sexless. Tess is three. Elliot is noxious. Elliot is sexless. Elliot is aberrant. Elliot is unforceful. Elliot is brag. Elliot is three. Elliot is sable. Parnell is noxious. Parnell is sexless. Parnell is aberrant. Parnell is unforceful. Parnell is brag. Parnell is three. Parnell is sable. If Elliot is noxious then Elliot is sexless. All three, aberrant things are noxious. If something is sexless and brag then it is sable. All aberrant things are brag. If something is sable then it is brag. If something is sexless and three then it is aberrant. All unforceful, noxious things are brag. Round things are aberrant. Tess is aberrant.", "logic": "\nSexless(tess)\nThree(tess)\nNoxious(elliot)\nSexless(elliot)\nAberrant(elliot)\nUnforceful(elliot)\nBrag(elliot)\nThree(elliot)\nSable(elliot)\nNoxious(parnell)\nSexless(parnell)\nAberrant(parnell)\nUnforceful(parnell)\nBrag(parnell)\nThree(parnell)\nSable(parnell)\nNoxious(elliot) -> Sexless(elliot)\nforall x (Three(x) and Aberrant(x) -> Noxious(x))\nforall x (Sexless(x) and Brag(x) -> Sable(x))\nforall x (Aberrant(x) -> Brag(x))\nforall x (Sable(x) -> Brag(x))\nforall x (Sexless(x) and Three(x) -> Aberrant(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) and Noxious(x) -> Brag(x))\nforall x (Sable(x) -> Aberrant(x))\n\nAberrant(tess)\n\nSexless(tess) and Three(tess) and forall x (Sexless(x) and Three(x) -> Aberrant(x)) -> therefore Aberrant(tess)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Blanca is schematic. Blanca is unmodified. Dewitt is tomentous. Dewitt is schematic. Dewitt is parentless. Dewitt is nugatory. Dewitt is beltless. Dewitt is unmodified. Dewitt is xxii. Steffie is tomentous. Steffie is schematic. Steffie is parentless. Steffie is nugatory. Steffie is beltless. Steffie is unmodified. Steffie is xxii. If Dewitt is tomentous then Dewitt is schematic. All unmodified, parentless things are tomentous. If something is schematic and beltless then it is xxii. All parentless things are beltless. If something is xxii then it is beltless. If something is schematic and unmodified then it is parentless. All nugatory, tomentous things are beltless. Round things are parentless. Blanca is not parentless.", "logic": "\nSchematic(blanca)\nUnmodified(blanca)\nTomentous(dewitt)\nSchematic(dewitt)\nParentless(dewitt)\nNugatory(dewitt)\nBeltless(dewitt)\nUnmodified(dewitt)\nXxii(dewitt)\nTomentous(steffie)\nSchematic(steffie)\nParentless(steffie)\nNugatory(steffie)\nBeltless(steffie)\nUnmodified(steffie)\nXxii(steffie)\nTomentous(dewitt) -> Schematic(dewitt)\nforall x (Unmodified(x) and Parentless(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) and Beltless(x) -> Xxii(x))\nforall x (Parentless(x) -> Beltless(x))\nforall x (Xxii(x) -> Beltless(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) and Unmodified(x) -> Parentless(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) and Tomentous(x) -> Beltless(x))\nforall x (Xxii(x) -> Parentless(x))\n\nnot Parentless(blanca)\n\nSchematic(blanca) and Unmodified(blanca) and forall x (Schematic(x) and Unmodified(x) -> Parentless(x)) -> therefore Parentless(blanca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Roman is plenteous. Roman is raised. Kellina is judicious. Kellina is plenteous. Kellina is unwrapped. Kellina is unsoluble. Kellina is mitigated. Kellina is raised. Kellina is mesenteric. Amalea is judicious. Amalea is plenteous. Amalea is unwrapped. Amalea is unsoluble. Amalea is mitigated. Amalea is raised. Amalea is mesenteric. If Kellina is judicious then Kellina is plenteous. All raised, unwrapped things are judicious. If something is plenteous and mitigated then it is mesenteric. All unwrapped things are mitigated. If something is mesenteric then it is mitigated. If something is plenteous and raised then it is unwrapped. All unsoluble, judicious things are mitigated. Round things are unwrapped. Roman is mitigated.", "logic": "\nPlenteous(roman)\nRaised(roman)\nJudicious(kellina)\nPlenteous(kellina)\nUnwrapped(kellina)\nUnsoluble(kellina)\nMitigated(kellina)\nRaised(kellina)\nMesenteric(kellina)\nJudicious(amalea)\nPlenteous(amalea)\nUnwrapped(amalea)\nUnsoluble(amalea)\nMitigated(amalea)\nRaised(amalea)\nMesenteric(amalea)\nJudicious(kellina) -> Plenteous(kellina)\nforall x (Raised(x) and Unwrapped(x) -> Judicious(x))\nforall x (Plenteous(x) and Mitigated(x) -> Mesenteric(x))\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Mitigated(x))\nforall x (Mesenteric(x) -> Mitigated(x))\nforall x (Plenteous(x) and Raised(x) -> Unwrapped(x))\nforall x (Unsoluble(x) and Judicious(x) -> Mitigated(x))\nforall x (Mesenteric(x) -> Unwrapped(x))\n\nMitigated(roman)\n\nPlenteous(roman) and Raised(roman) and forall x (Plenteous(x) and Raised(x) -> Unwrapped(x)) -> therefore Unwrapped(roman) Unwrapped(roman) and forall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Mitigated(x)) -> therefore Mitigated(roman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Gaspar is weakly. Gaspar is continuing. Ansley is arthralgic. Ansley is weakly. Ansley is publicised. Ansley is flagellate. Ansley is pessimum. Ansley is continuing. Ansley is steadied. Sander is arthralgic. Sander is weakly. Sander is publicised. Sander is flagellate. Sander is pessimum. Sander is continuing. Sander is steadied. If Ansley is arthralgic then Ansley is weakly. All continuing, publicised things are arthralgic. If something is weakly and pessimum then it is steadied. All publicised things are pessimum. If something is steadied then it is pessimum. If something is weakly and continuing then it is publicised. All flagellate, arthralgic things are pessimum. Round things are publicised. Gaspar is not arthralgic.", "logic": "\nWeakly(gaspar)\nContinuing(gaspar)\nArthralgic(ansley)\nWeakly(ansley)\nPublicised(ansley)\nFlagellate(ansley)\nPessimum(ansley)\nContinuing(ansley)\nSteadied(ansley)\nArthralgic(sander)\nWeakly(sander)\nPublicised(sander)\nFlagellate(sander)\nPessimum(sander)\nContinuing(sander)\nSteadied(sander)\nArthralgic(ansley) -> Weakly(ansley)\nforall x (Continuing(x) and Publicised(x) -> Arthralgic(x))\nforall x (Weakly(x) and Pessimum(x) -> Steadied(x))\nforall x (Publicised(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Weakly(x) and Continuing(x) -> Publicised(x))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) and Arthralgic(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Publicised(x))\n\nnot Arthralgic(gaspar)\n\nWeakly(gaspar) and Continuing(gaspar) and forall x (Weakly(x) and Continuing(x) -> Publicised(x)) -> therefore Publicised(gaspar) Continuing(gaspar) and Publicised(gaspar) and forall x (Continuing(x) and Publicised(x) -> Arthralgic(x)) -> therefore Arthralgic(gaspar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Phyllys is anamorphic. Phyllys is barrelled. Ricard is elastic. Ricard is anamorphic. Ricard is wild. Ricard is sectioned. Ricard is spendable. Ricard is barrelled. Ricard is noncausal. Quinlan is elastic. Quinlan is anamorphic. Quinlan is wild. Quinlan is sectioned. Quinlan is spendable. Quinlan is barrelled. Quinlan is noncausal. If Ricard is elastic then Ricard is anamorphic. All barrelled, wild things are elastic. If something is anamorphic and spendable then it is noncausal. All wild things are spendable. If something is noncausal then it is spendable. If something is anamorphic and barrelled then it is wild. All sectioned, elastic things are spendable. Round things are wild. Phyllys is noncausal.", "logic": "\nAnamorphic(phyllys)\nBarrelled(phyllys)\nElastic(ricard)\nAnamorphic(ricard)\nWild(ricard)\nSectioned(ricard)\nSpendable(ricard)\nBarrelled(ricard)\nNoncausal(ricard)\nElastic(quinlan)\nAnamorphic(quinlan)\nWild(quinlan)\nSectioned(quinlan)\nSpendable(quinlan)\nBarrelled(quinlan)\nNoncausal(quinlan)\nElastic(ricard) -> Anamorphic(ricard)\nforall x (Barrelled(x) and Wild(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) and Spendable(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Wild(x) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) and Barrelled(x) -> Wild(x))\nforall x (Sectioned(x) and Elastic(x) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Wild(x))\n\nNoncausal(phyllys)\n\nAnamorphic(phyllys) and Barrelled(phyllys) and forall x (Anamorphic(x) and Barrelled(x) -> Wild(x)) -> therefore Wild(phyllys) Wild(phyllys) and forall x (Wild(x) -> Spendable(x)) -> therefore Spendable(phyllys) Anamorphic(phyllys) and Spendable(phyllys) and forall x (Anamorphic(x) and Spendable(x) -> Noncausal(x)) -> therefore Noncausal(phyllys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Caty is tributary. Caty is fanatic. Theadora is prompt. Theadora is tributary. Theadora is laborious. Theadora is hydraulic. Theadora is tyrannical. Theadora is fanatic. Theadora is lapidary. Rozanna is prompt. Rozanna is tributary. Rozanna is laborious. Rozanna is hydraulic. Rozanna is tyrannical. Rozanna is fanatic. Rozanna is lapidary. If Theadora is prompt then Theadora is tributary. All fanatic, laborious things are prompt. If something is tributary and tyrannical then it is lapidary. All laborious things are tyrannical. If something is lapidary then it is tyrannical. If something is tributary and fanatic then it is laborious. All hydraulic, prompt things are tyrannical. Round things are laborious. Caty is not lapidary.", "logic": "\nTributary(caty)\nFanatic(caty)\nPrompt(theadora)\nTributary(theadora)\nLaborious(theadora)\nHydraulic(theadora)\nTyrannical(theadora)\nFanatic(theadora)\nLapidary(theadora)\nPrompt(rozanna)\nTributary(rozanna)\nLaborious(rozanna)\nHydraulic(rozanna)\nTyrannical(rozanna)\nFanatic(rozanna)\nLapidary(rozanna)\nPrompt(theadora) -> Tributary(theadora)\nforall x (Fanatic(x) and Laborious(x) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) and Tyrannical(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) and Fanatic(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Hydraulic(x) and Prompt(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Laborious(x))\n\nnot Lapidary(caty)\n\nTributary(caty) and Fanatic(caty) and forall x (Tributary(x) and Fanatic(x) -> Laborious(x)) -> therefore Laborious(caty) Laborious(caty) and forall x (Laborious(x) -> Tyrannical(x)) -> therefore Tyrannical(caty) Tributary(caty) and Tyrannical(caty) and forall x (Tributary(x) and Tyrannical(x) -> Lapidary(x)) -> therefore Lapidary(caty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "The jereme bodge the rosaline. The jereme admire the rosaline. The rosaline is uneventful. The rosaline admire the clea. The clea bodge the jereme. The clea bodge the clary. The clea is cooked. The clea is uneventful. The clea is satellite. The clea admire the clary. The clary bodge the jereme. The clary is inland. The clary admire the jereme. The clary does not like the clea. The clary does not need the clea. If something is uneventful then it vocalise the clary. If something vocalise the clary then it is satellite. Round things are agnostical. If the rosaline does not chase the clea and the rosaline does not need the clea then the rosaline is not uneventful. If the rosaline admire the jereme then the rosaline does not need the jereme. If something admire the jereme then the jereme vocalise the clary. If the rosaline is inland and the rosaline does not chase the clary then the clary is not inland. If the clea does not need the clary then the clary bodge the clea. The clea is cooked.", "logic": "\nBodge(jereme, rosaline)\nAdmire(jereme, rosaline)\nUneventful(rosaline)\nAdmire(rosaline, clea)\nBodge(clea, jereme)\nBodge(clea, clary)\nCooked(clea)\nUneventful(clea)\nSatellite(clea)\nAdmire(clea, clary)\nBodge(clary, jereme)\nInland(clary)\nAdmire(clary, jereme)\nnot Admire(clary, clea)\nnot Vocalise(clary, clea)\nforall x (Uneventful(x) -> Vocalise(x, clary))\nforall x (Vocalise(x, clary) -> Satellite(x))\nforall x (Satellite(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nnot Bodge(rosaline, clea) and not Vocalise(rosaline, clea) -> not Uneventful(rosaline)\nAdmire(rosaline, jereme) -> not Vocalise(rosaline, jereme)\nforall x (Admire(x, jereme) -> Vocalise(jereme, clary))\nInland(rosaline) and not Bodge(rosaline, clary) -> not Inland(clary)\nnot Vocalise(clea, clary) -> Bodge(clary, clea)\n\nCooked(clea)\n\ntherefore Cooked(clea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The rozalie stride the reiko. The rozalie reprobate the reiko. The reiko is supplicant. The reiko reprobate the jean. The jean stride the rozalie. The jean stride the wilmar. The jean is unbending. The jean is supplicant. The jean is executive. The jean reprobate the wilmar. The wilmar stride the rozalie. The wilmar is unlifelike. The wilmar reprobate the rozalie. The wilmar does not like the jean. The wilmar does not need the jean. If something is supplicant then it metricate the wilmar. If something metricate the wilmar then it is executive. Round things are laughing. If the reiko does not chase the jean and the reiko does not need the jean then the reiko is not supplicant. If the reiko reprobate the rozalie then the reiko does not need the rozalie. If something reprobate the rozalie then the rozalie metricate the wilmar. If the reiko is unlifelike and the reiko does not chase the wilmar then the wilmar is not unlifelike. If the jean does not need the wilmar then the wilmar stride the jean. The reiko does not like the jean.", "logic": "\nStride(rozalie, reiko)\nReprobate(rozalie, reiko)\nSupplicant(reiko)\nReprobate(reiko, jean)\nStride(jean, rozalie)\nStride(jean, wilmar)\nUnbending(jean)\nSupplicant(jean)\nExecutive(jean)\nReprobate(jean, wilmar)\nStride(wilmar, rozalie)\nUnlifelike(wilmar)\nReprobate(wilmar, rozalie)\nnot Reprobate(wilmar, jean)\nnot Metricate(wilmar, jean)\nforall x (Supplicant(x) -> Metricate(x, wilmar))\nforall x (Metricate(x, wilmar) -> Executive(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) -> Laughing(x))\nnot Stride(reiko, jean) and not Metricate(reiko, jean) -> not Supplicant(reiko)\nReprobate(reiko, rozalie) -> not Metricate(reiko, rozalie)\nforall x (Reprobate(x, rozalie) -> Metricate(rozalie, wilmar))\nUnlifelike(reiko) and not Stride(reiko, wilmar) -> not Unlifelike(wilmar)\nnot Metricate(jean, wilmar) -> Stride(wilmar, jean)\n\nnot Reprobate(reiko, jean)\n\ntherefore Reprobate(reiko, jean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The kristine hector the suzann. The kristine disgrace the suzann. The suzann is hazel. The suzann disgrace the yoshi. The yoshi hector the kristine. The yoshi hector the henriette. The yoshi is shot. The yoshi is hazel. The yoshi is liable. The yoshi disgrace the henriette. The henriette hector the kristine. The henriette is dwindling. The henriette disgrace the kristine. The henriette does not like the yoshi. The henriette does not need the yoshi. If something is hazel then it palpitate the henriette. If something palpitate the henriette then it is liable. Round things are motorial. If the suzann does not chase the yoshi and the suzann does not need the yoshi then the suzann is not hazel. If the suzann disgrace the kristine then the suzann does not need the kristine. If something disgrace the kristine then the kristine palpitate the henriette. If the suzann is dwindling and the suzann does not chase the henriette then the henriette is not dwindling. If the yoshi does not need the henriette then the henriette hector the yoshi. The yoshi palpitate the henriette.", "logic": "\nHector(kristine, suzann)\nDisgrace(kristine, suzann)\nHazel(suzann)\nDisgrace(suzann, yoshi)\nHector(yoshi, kristine)\nHector(yoshi, henriette)\nShot(yoshi)\nHazel(yoshi)\nLiable(yoshi)\nDisgrace(yoshi, henriette)\nHector(henriette, kristine)\nDwindling(henriette)\nDisgrace(henriette, kristine)\nnot Disgrace(henriette, yoshi)\nnot Palpitate(henriette, yoshi)\nforall x (Hazel(x) -> Palpitate(x, henriette))\nforall x (Palpitate(x, henriette) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Motorial(x))\nnot Hector(suzann, yoshi) and not Palpitate(suzann, yoshi) -> not Hazel(suzann)\nDisgrace(suzann, kristine) -> not Palpitate(suzann, kristine)\nforall x (Disgrace(x, kristine) -> Palpitate(kristine, henriette))\nDwindling(suzann) and not Hector(suzann, henriette) -> not Dwindling(henriette)\nnot Palpitate(yoshi, henriette) -> Hector(henriette, yoshi)\n\nPalpitate(yoshi, henriette)\n\nHazel(yoshi) and forall x (Hazel(x) -> Palpitate(x, henriette)) -> therefore Palpitate(yoshi, henriette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The ameline terrorise the colline. The ameline kink the colline. The colline is octal. The colline kink the winnifred. The winnifred terrorise the ameline. The winnifred terrorise the janifer. The winnifred is bursiform. The winnifred is octal. The winnifred is syncretic. The winnifred kink the janifer. The janifer terrorise the ameline. The janifer is correlated. The janifer kink the ameline. The janifer does not like the winnifred. The janifer does not need the winnifred. If something is octal then it bulldog the janifer. If something bulldog the janifer then it is syncretic. Round things are austrian. If the colline does not chase the winnifred and the colline does not need the winnifred then the colline is not octal. If the colline kink the ameline then the colline does not need the ameline. If something kink the ameline then the ameline bulldog the janifer. If the colline is correlated and the colline does not chase the janifer then the janifer is not correlated. If the winnifred does not need the janifer then the janifer terrorise the winnifred. The winnifred does not need the janifer.", "logic": "\nTerrorise(ameline, colline)\nKink(ameline, colline)\nOctal(colline)\nKink(colline, winnifred)\nTerrorise(winnifred, ameline)\nTerrorise(winnifred, janifer)\nBursiform(winnifred)\nOctal(winnifred)\nSyncretic(winnifred)\nKink(winnifred, janifer)\nTerrorise(janifer, ameline)\nCorrelated(janifer)\nKink(janifer, ameline)\nnot Kink(janifer, winnifred)\nnot Bulldog(janifer, winnifred)\nforall x (Octal(x) -> Bulldog(x, janifer))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, janifer) -> Syncretic(x))\nforall x (Syncretic(x) -> Austrian(x))\nnot Terrorise(colline, winnifred) and not Bulldog(colline, winnifred) -> not Octal(colline)\nKink(colline, ameline) -> not Bulldog(colline, ameline)\nforall x (Kink(x, ameline) -> Bulldog(ameline, janifer))\nCorrelated(colline) and not Terrorise(colline, janifer) -> not Correlated(janifer)\nnot Bulldog(winnifred, janifer) -> Terrorise(janifer, winnifred)\n\nnot Bulldog(winnifred, janifer)\n\nOctal(winnifred) and forall x (Octal(x) -> Bulldog(x, janifer)) -> therefore Bulldog(winnifred, janifer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The nerty polarize the thad. The nerty offset the thad. The thad is absorptive. The thad offset the antonina. The antonina polarize the nerty. The antonina polarize the sky. The antonina is invidious. The antonina is absorptive. The antonina is pasted. The antonina offset the sky. The sky polarize the nerty. The sky is lowbred. The sky offset the nerty. The sky does not like the antonina. The sky does not need the antonina. If something is absorptive then it masturbate the sky. If something masturbate the sky then it is pasted. Round things are biliary. If the thad does not chase the antonina and the thad does not need the antonina then the thad is not absorptive. If the thad offset the nerty then the thad does not need the nerty. If something offset the nerty then the nerty masturbate the sky. If the thad is lowbred and the thad does not chase the sky then the sky is not lowbred. If the antonina does not need the sky then the sky polarize the antonina. The thad is pasted.", "logic": "\nPolarize(nerty, thad)\nOffset(nerty, thad)\nAbsorptive(thad)\nOffset(thad, antonina)\nPolarize(antonina, nerty)\nPolarize(antonina, sky)\nInvidious(antonina)\nAbsorptive(antonina)\nPasted(antonina)\nOffset(antonina, sky)\nPolarize(sky, nerty)\nLowbred(sky)\nOffset(sky, nerty)\nnot Offset(sky, antonina)\nnot Masturbate(sky, antonina)\nforall x (Absorptive(x) -> Masturbate(x, sky))\nforall x (Masturbate(x, sky) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Pasted(x) -> Biliary(x))\nnot Polarize(thad, antonina) and not Masturbate(thad, antonina) -> not Absorptive(thad)\nOffset(thad, nerty) -> not Masturbate(thad, nerty)\nforall x (Offset(x, nerty) -> Masturbate(nerty, sky))\nLowbred(thad) and not Polarize(thad, sky) -> not Lowbred(sky)\nnot Masturbate(antonina, sky) -> Polarize(sky, antonina)\n\nPasted(thad)\n\nAbsorptive(thad) and forall x (Absorptive(x) -> Masturbate(x, sky)) -> therefore Masturbate(thad, sky) Masturbate(thad, sky) and forall x (Masturbate(x, sky) -> Pasted(x)) -> therefore Pasted(thad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The edy halloo the alyson. The edy cloister the alyson. The alyson is unshackled. The alyson cloister the teodoor. The teodoor halloo the edy. The teodoor halloo the sandy. The teodoor is utilizable. The teodoor is unshackled. The teodoor is woollen. The teodoor cloister the sandy. The sandy halloo the edy. The sandy is cinematic. The sandy cloister the edy. The sandy does not like the teodoor. The sandy does not need the teodoor. If something is unshackled then it lack the sandy. If something lack the sandy then it is woollen. Round things are leathered. If the alyson does not chase the teodoor and the alyson does not need the teodoor then the alyson is not unshackled. If the alyson cloister the edy then the alyson does not need the edy. If something cloister the edy then the edy lack the sandy. If the alyson is cinematic and the alyson does not chase the sandy then the sandy is not cinematic. If the teodoor does not need the sandy then the sandy halloo the teodoor. The edy is not woollen.", "logic": "\nHalloo(edy, alyson)\nCloister(edy, alyson)\nUnshackled(alyson)\nCloister(alyson, teodoor)\nHalloo(teodoor, edy)\nHalloo(teodoor, sandy)\nUtilizable(teodoor)\nUnshackled(teodoor)\nWoollen(teodoor)\nCloister(teodoor, sandy)\nHalloo(sandy, edy)\nCinematic(sandy)\nCloister(sandy, edy)\nnot Cloister(sandy, teodoor)\nnot Lack(sandy, teodoor)\nforall x (Unshackled(x) -> Lack(x, sandy))\nforall x (Lack(x, sandy) -> Woollen(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) -> Leathered(x))\nnot Halloo(alyson, teodoor) and not Lack(alyson, teodoor) -> not Unshackled(alyson)\nCloister(alyson, edy) -> not Lack(alyson, edy)\nforall x (Cloister(x, edy) -> Lack(edy, sandy))\nCinematic(alyson) and not Halloo(alyson, sandy) -> not Cinematic(sandy)\nnot Lack(teodoor, sandy) -> Halloo(sandy, teodoor)\n\nnot Woollen(edy)\n\nCloister(sandy, edy) and forall x (Cloister(x, edy) -> Lack(edy, sandy)) -> therefore Lack(edy, sandy) Lack(edy, sandy) and forall x (Lack(x, sandy) -> Woollen(x)) -> therefore Woollen(edy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The bride skirl the ware. The bride sediment the ware. The ware is basal. The ware sediment the jojo. The jojo skirl the bride. The jojo skirl the mack. The jojo is limp. The jojo is basal. The jojo is tensile. The jojo sediment the mack. The mack skirl the bride. The mack is antitypic. The mack sediment the bride. The mack does not like the jojo. The mack does not need the jojo. If something is basal then it ablate the mack. If something ablate the mack then it is tensile. Round things are deciphered. If the ware does not chase the jojo and the ware does not need the jojo then the ware is not basal. If the ware sediment the bride then the ware does not need the bride. If something sediment the bride then the bride ablate the mack. If the ware is antitypic and the ware does not chase the mack then the mack is not antitypic. If the jojo does not need the mack then the mack skirl the jojo. The bride is deciphered.", "logic": "\nSkirl(bride, ware)\nSediment(bride, ware)\nBasal(ware)\nSediment(ware, jojo)\nSkirl(jojo, bride)\nSkirl(jojo, mack)\nLimp(jojo)\nBasal(jojo)\nTensile(jojo)\nSediment(jojo, mack)\nSkirl(mack, bride)\nAntitypic(mack)\nSediment(mack, bride)\nnot Sediment(mack, jojo)\nnot Ablate(mack, jojo)\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Ablate(x, mack))\nforall x (Ablate(x, mack) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Tensile(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nnot Skirl(ware, jojo) and not Ablate(ware, jojo) -> not Basal(ware)\nSediment(ware, bride) -> not Ablate(ware, bride)\nforall x (Sediment(x, bride) -> Ablate(bride, mack))\nAntitypic(ware) and not Skirl(ware, mack) -> not Antitypic(mack)\nnot Ablate(jojo, mack) -> Skirl(mack, jojo)\n\nDeciphered(bride)\n\nSediment(mack, bride) and forall x (Sediment(x, bride) -> Ablate(bride, mack)) -> therefore Ablate(bride, mack) Ablate(bride, mack) and forall x (Ablate(x, mack) -> Tensile(x)) -> therefore Tensile(bride) Tensile(bride) and forall x (Tensile(x) -> Deciphered(x)) -> therefore Deciphered(bride)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The roxanna slug the gay. The roxanna fete the gay. The gay is ecuadorian. The gay fete the gratia. The gratia slug the roxanna. The gratia slug the caroline. The gratia is deflated. The gratia is ecuadorian. The gratia is sessile. The gratia fete the caroline. The caroline slug the roxanna. The caroline is nuts. The caroline fete the roxanna. The caroline does not like the gratia. The caroline does not need the gratia. If something is ecuadorian then it dwarf the caroline. If something dwarf the caroline then it is sessile. Round things are ramate. If the gay does not chase the gratia and the gay does not need the gratia then the gay is not ecuadorian. If the gay fete the roxanna then the gay does not need the roxanna. If something fete the roxanna then the roxanna dwarf the caroline. If the gay is nuts and the gay does not chase the caroline then the caroline is not nuts. If the gratia does not need the caroline then the caroline slug the gratia. The gay is not ramate.", "logic": "\nSlug(roxanna, gay)\nFete(roxanna, gay)\nEcuadorian(gay)\nFete(gay, gratia)\nSlug(gratia, roxanna)\nSlug(gratia, caroline)\nDeflated(gratia)\nEcuadorian(gratia)\nSessile(gratia)\nFete(gratia, caroline)\nSlug(caroline, roxanna)\nNuts(caroline)\nFete(caroline, roxanna)\nnot Fete(caroline, gratia)\nnot Dwarf(caroline, gratia)\nforall x (Ecuadorian(x) -> Dwarf(x, caroline))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, caroline) -> Sessile(x))\nforall x (Sessile(x) -> Ramate(x))\nnot Slug(gay, gratia) and not Dwarf(gay, gratia) -> not Ecuadorian(gay)\nFete(gay, roxanna) -> not Dwarf(gay, roxanna)\nforall x (Fete(x, roxanna) -> Dwarf(roxanna, caroline))\nNuts(gay) and not Slug(gay, caroline) -> not Nuts(caroline)\nnot Dwarf(gratia, caroline) -> Slug(caroline, gratia)\n\nnot Ramate(gay)\n\nEcuadorian(gay) and forall x (Ecuadorian(x) -> Dwarf(x, caroline)) -> therefore Dwarf(gay, caroline) Dwarf(gay, caroline) and forall x (Dwarf(x, caroline) -> Sessile(x)) -> therefore Sessile(gay) Sessile(gay) and forall x (Sessile(x) -> Ramate(x)) -> therefore Ramate(gay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The wilone gleam the leanora. The wilone acetylate the leanora. The leanora is ambitious. The leanora acetylate the garvin. The garvin gleam the wilone. The garvin gleam the fredelia. The garvin is monthlong. The garvin is ambitious. The garvin is smuggled. The garvin acetylate the fredelia. The fredelia gleam the wilone. The fredelia is apiculate. The fredelia acetylate the wilone. The fredelia does not like the garvin. The fredelia does not need the garvin. If something is ambitious then it supply the fredelia. If something supply the fredelia then it is smuggled. Round things are manual. If the leanora does not chase the garvin and the leanora does not need the garvin then the leanora is not ambitious. If the leanora acetylate the wilone then the leanora does not need the wilone. If something acetylate the wilone then the wilone supply the fredelia. If the leanora is apiculate and the leanora does not chase the fredelia then the fredelia is not apiculate. If the garvin does not need the fredelia then the fredelia gleam the garvin. The fredelia does not chase the garvin.", "logic": "\nGleam(wilone, leanora)\nAcetylate(wilone, leanora)\nAmbitious(leanora)\nAcetylate(leanora, garvin)\nGleam(garvin, wilone)\nGleam(garvin, fredelia)\nMonthlong(garvin)\nAmbitious(garvin)\nSmuggled(garvin)\nAcetylate(garvin, fredelia)\nGleam(fredelia, wilone)\nApiculate(fredelia)\nAcetylate(fredelia, wilone)\nnot Acetylate(fredelia, garvin)\nnot Supply(fredelia, garvin)\nforall x (Ambitious(x) -> Supply(x, fredelia))\nforall x (Supply(x, fredelia) -> Smuggled(x))\nforall x (Smuggled(x) -> Manual(x))\nnot Gleam(leanora, garvin) and not Supply(leanora, garvin) -> not Ambitious(leanora)\nAcetylate(leanora, wilone) -> not Supply(leanora, wilone)\nforall x (Acetylate(x, wilone) -> Supply(wilone, fredelia))\nApiculate(leanora) and not Gleam(leanora, fredelia) -> not Apiculate(fredelia)\nnot Supply(garvin, fredelia) -> Gleam(fredelia, garvin)\n\nnot Gleam(fredelia, garvin)\n\nnot Supply(garvin, fredelia) -> Gleam(fredelia, garvin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The deloris enforce the toby. The deloris labour the toby. The toby is essene. The toby labour the hagan. The hagan enforce the deloris. The hagan enforce the lilli. The hagan is spinnbar. The hagan is essene. The hagan is lossless. The hagan labour the lilli. The lilli enforce the deloris. The lilli is twee. The lilli labour the deloris. The lilli does not like the hagan. The lilli does not need the hagan. If something is essene then it ponder the lilli. If something ponder the lilli then it is lossless. Round things are latvian. If the toby does not chase the hagan and the toby does not need the hagan then the toby is not essene. If the toby labour the deloris then the toby does not need the deloris. If something labour the deloris then the deloris ponder the lilli. If the toby is twee and the toby does not chase the lilli then the lilli is not twee. If the hagan does not need the lilli then the lilli enforce the hagan. The lilli ponder the lilli.", "logic": "\nEnforce(deloris, toby)\nLabour(deloris, toby)\nEssene(toby)\nLabour(toby, hagan)\nEnforce(hagan, deloris)\nEnforce(hagan, lilli)\nSpinnbar(hagan)\nEssene(hagan)\nLossless(hagan)\nLabour(hagan, lilli)\nEnforce(lilli, deloris)\nTwee(lilli)\nLabour(lilli, deloris)\nnot Labour(lilli, hagan)\nnot Ponder(lilli, hagan)\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Ponder(x, lilli))\nforall x (Ponder(x, lilli) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Latvian(x))\nnot Enforce(toby, hagan) and not Ponder(toby, hagan) -> not Essene(toby)\nLabour(toby, deloris) -> not Ponder(toby, deloris)\nforall x (Labour(x, deloris) -> Ponder(deloris, lilli))\nTwee(toby) and not Enforce(toby, lilli) -> not Twee(lilli)\nnot Ponder(hagan, lilli) -> Enforce(lilli, hagan)\n\nPonder(lilli, lilli)\n\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Ponder(x, lilli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The fayina overvalue the gladis. The fayina speechify the gladis. The gladis is cheeky. The gladis speechify the northrop. The northrop overvalue the fayina. The northrop overvalue the aindrea. The northrop is unchained. The northrop is cheeky. The northrop is dormie. The northrop speechify the aindrea. The aindrea overvalue the fayina. The aindrea is hygienic. The aindrea speechify the fayina. The aindrea does not like the northrop. The aindrea does not need the northrop. If something is cheeky then it disinvest the aindrea. If something disinvest the aindrea then it is dormie. Round things are unabated. If the gladis does not chase the northrop and the gladis does not need the northrop then the gladis is not cheeky. If the gladis speechify the fayina then the gladis does not need the fayina. If something speechify the fayina then the fayina disinvest the aindrea. If the gladis is hygienic and the gladis does not chase the aindrea then the aindrea is not hygienic. If the northrop does not need the aindrea then the aindrea overvalue the northrop. The aindrea is not dormie.", "logic": "\nOvervalue(fayina, gladis)\nSpeechify(fayina, gladis)\nCheeky(gladis)\nSpeechify(gladis, northrop)\nOvervalue(northrop, fayina)\nOvervalue(northrop, aindrea)\nUnchained(northrop)\nCheeky(northrop)\nDormie(northrop)\nSpeechify(northrop, aindrea)\nOvervalue(aindrea, fayina)\nHygienic(aindrea)\nSpeechify(aindrea, fayina)\nnot Speechify(aindrea, northrop)\nnot Disinvest(aindrea, northrop)\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> Disinvest(x, aindrea))\nforall x (Disinvest(x, aindrea) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Dormie(x) -> Unabated(x))\nnot Overvalue(gladis, northrop) and not Disinvest(gladis, northrop) -> not Cheeky(gladis)\nSpeechify(gladis, fayina) -> not Disinvest(gladis, fayina)\nforall x (Speechify(x, fayina) -> Disinvest(fayina, aindrea))\nHygienic(gladis) and not Overvalue(gladis, aindrea) -> not Hygienic(aindrea)\nnot Disinvest(northrop, aindrea) -> Overvalue(aindrea, northrop)\n\nnot Dormie(aindrea)\n\nforall x (Disinvest(x, aindrea) -> Dormie(x)) <- forall x (Cheeky(x) -> Disinvest(x, aindrea)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The berrie utter the kelvin. The berrie indispose the kelvin. The kelvin is procedural. The kelvin indispose the avery. The avery utter the berrie. The avery utter the yuri. The avery is aliquot. The avery is procedural. The avery is malleable. The avery indispose the yuri. The yuri utter the berrie. The yuri is untitled. The yuri indispose the berrie. The yuri does not like the avery. The yuri does not need the avery. If something is procedural then it stabilise the yuri. If something stabilise the yuri then it is malleable. Round things are creditable. If the kelvin does not chase the avery and the kelvin does not need the avery then the kelvin is not procedural. If the kelvin indispose the berrie then the kelvin does not need the berrie. If something indispose the berrie then the berrie stabilise the yuri. If the kelvin is untitled and the kelvin does not chase the yuri then the yuri is not untitled. If the avery does not need the yuri then the yuri utter the avery. The yuri is creditable.", "logic": "\nUtter(berrie, kelvin)\nIndispose(berrie, kelvin)\nProcedural(kelvin)\nIndispose(kelvin, avery)\nUtter(avery, berrie)\nUtter(avery, yuri)\nAliquot(avery)\nProcedural(avery)\nMalleable(avery)\nIndispose(avery, yuri)\nUtter(yuri, berrie)\nUntitled(yuri)\nIndispose(yuri, berrie)\nnot Indispose(yuri, avery)\nnot Stabilise(yuri, avery)\nforall x (Procedural(x) -> Stabilise(x, yuri))\nforall x (Stabilise(x, yuri) -> Malleable(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) -> Creditable(x))\nnot Utter(kelvin, avery) and not Stabilise(kelvin, avery) -> not Procedural(kelvin)\nIndispose(kelvin, berrie) -> not Stabilise(kelvin, berrie)\nforall x (Indispose(x, berrie) -> Stabilise(berrie, yuri))\nUntitled(kelvin) and not Utter(kelvin, yuri) -> not Untitled(yuri)\nnot Stabilise(avery, yuri) -> Utter(yuri, avery)\n\nCreditable(yuri)\n\nforall x (Malleable(x) -> Creditable(x)) <- forall x (Stabilise(x, yuri) -> Malleable(x)) <- forall x (Procedural(x) -> Stabilise(x, yuri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The aurelie sailplane the candra. The aurelie sodomize the candra. The candra is aerobic. The candra sodomize the jada. The jada sailplane the aurelie. The jada sailplane the noel. The jada is hadal. The jada is aerobic. The jada is shocked. The jada sodomize the noel. The noel sailplane the aurelie. The noel is christian. The noel sodomize the aurelie. The noel does not like the jada. The noel does not need the jada. If something is aerobic then it shellac the noel. If something shellac the noel then it is shocked. Round things are monaural. If the candra does not chase the jada and the candra does not need the jada then the candra is not aerobic. If the candra sodomize the aurelie then the candra does not need the aurelie. If something sodomize the aurelie then the aurelie shellac the noel. If the candra is christian and the candra does not chase the noel then the noel is not christian. If the jada does not need the noel then the noel sailplane the jada. The noel does not like the noel.", "logic": "\nSailplane(aurelie, candra)\nSodomize(aurelie, candra)\nAerobic(candra)\nSodomize(candra, jada)\nSailplane(jada, aurelie)\nSailplane(jada, noel)\nHadal(jada)\nAerobic(jada)\nShocked(jada)\nSodomize(jada, noel)\nSailplane(noel, aurelie)\nChristian(noel)\nSodomize(noel, aurelie)\nnot Sodomize(noel, jada)\nnot Shellac(noel, jada)\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Shellac(x, noel))\nforall x (Shellac(x, noel) -> Shocked(x))\nforall x (Shocked(x) -> Monaural(x))\nnot Sailplane(candra, jada) and not Shellac(candra, jada) -> not Aerobic(candra)\nSodomize(candra, aurelie) -> not Shellac(candra, aurelie)\nforall x (Sodomize(x, aurelie) -> Shellac(aurelie, noel))\nChristian(candra) and not Sailplane(candra, noel) -> not Christian(noel)\nnot Shellac(jada, noel) -> Sailplane(noel, jada)\n\nnot Sodomize(noel, noel)\n\nnot Sodomize(noel, noel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The clarisa orientate the kalina. The clarisa lick the kalina. The kalina is adjectival. The kalina lick the betteann. The betteann orientate the clarisa. The betteann orientate the callida. The betteann is xlvii. The betteann is adjectival. The betteann is mediocre. The betteann lick the callida. The callida orientate the clarisa. The callida is acute. The callida lick the clarisa. The callida does not like the betteann. The callida does not need the betteann. If something is adjectival then it refine the callida. If something refine the callida then it is mediocre. Round things are hurtful. If the kalina does not chase the betteann and the kalina does not need the betteann then the kalina is not adjectival. If the kalina lick the clarisa then the kalina does not need the clarisa. If something lick the clarisa then the clarisa refine the callida. If the kalina is acute and the kalina does not chase the callida then the callida is not acute. If the betteann does not need the callida then the callida orientate the betteann. The clarisa is xlvii.", "logic": "\nOrientate(clarisa, kalina)\nLick(clarisa, kalina)\nAdjectival(kalina)\nLick(kalina, betteann)\nOrientate(betteann, clarisa)\nOrientate(betteann, callida)\nXlvii(betteann)\nAdjectival(betteann)\nMediocre(betteann)\nLick(betteann, callida)\nOrientate(callida, clarisa)\nAcute(callida)\nLick(callida, clarisa)\nnot Lick(callida, betteann)\nnot Refine(callida, betteann)\nforall x (Adjectival(x) -> Refine(x, callida))\nforall x (Refine(x, callida) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) -> Hurtful(x))\nnot Orientate(kalina, betteann) and not Refine(kalina, betteann) -> not Adjectival(kalina)\nLick(kalina, clarisa) -> not Refine(kalina, clarisa)\nforall x (Lick(x, clarisa) -> Refine(clarisa, callida))\nAcute(kalina) and not Orientate(kalina, callida) -> not Acute(callida)\nnot Refine(betteann, callida) -> Orientate(callida, betteann)\n\nXlvii(clarisa)\n\nXlvii(clarisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The derrin demarcate the ulrika. The derrin hike the ulrika. The ulrika is necklike. The ulrika hike the micheal. The micheal demarcate the derrin. The micheal demarcate the pam. The micheal is reeking. The micheal is necklike. The micheal is bulgy. The micheal hike the pam. The pam demarcate the derrin. The pam is unfaceted. The pam hike the derrin. The pam does not like the micheal. The pam does not need the micheal. If something is necklike then it soot the pam. If something soot the pam then it is bulgy. Round things are pervious. If the ulrika does not chase the micheal and the ulrika does not need the micheal then the ulrika is not necklike. If the ulrika hike the derrin then the ulrika does not need the derrin. If something hike the derrin then the derrin soot the pam. If the ulrika is unfaceted and the ulrika does not chase the pam then the pam is not unfaceted. If the micheal does not need the pam then the pam demarcate the micheal. The micheal does not need the ulrika.", "logic": "\nDemarcate(derrin, ulrika)\nHike(derrin, ulrika)\nNecklike(ulrika)\nHike(ulrika, micheal)\nDemarcate(micheal, derrin)\nDemarcate(micheal, pam)\nReeking(micheal)\nNecklike(micheal)\nBulgy(micheal)\nHike(micheal, pam)\nDemarcate(pam, derrin)\nUnfaceted(pam)\nHike(pam, derrin)\nnot Hike(pam, micheal)\nnot Soot(pam, micheal)\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Soot(x, pam))\nforall x (Soot(x, pam) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Bulgy(x) -> Pervious(x))\nnot Demarcate(ulrika, micheal) and not Soot(ulrika, micheal) -> not Necklike(ulrika)\nHike(ulrika, derrin) -> not Soot(ulrika, derrin)\nforall x (Hike(x, derrin) -> Soot(derrin, pam))\nUnfaceted(ulrika) and not Demarcate(ulrika, pam) -> not Unfaceted(pam)\nnot Soot(micheal, pam) -> Demarcate(pam, micheal)\n\nnot Soot(micheal, ulrika)\n\nnot Soot(micheal, ulrika) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The lorelle express the kermit. The lorelle amalgamate the kermit. The kermit is cheliceral. The kermit amalgamate the vachel. The vachel express the lorelle. The vachel express the bancroft. The vachel is unthought. The vachel is cheliceral. The vachel is pimply. The vachel amalgamate the bancroft. The bancroft express the lorelle. The bancroft is extempore. The bancroft amalgamate the lorelle. The bancroft does not like the vachel. The bancroft does not need the vachel. If something is cheliceral then it imperil the bancroft. If something imperil the bancroft then it is pimply. Round things are bustling. If the kermit does not chase the vachel and the kermit does not need the vachel then the kermit is not cheliceral. If the kermit amalgamate the lorelle then the kermit does not need the lorelle. If something amalgamate the lorelle then the lorelle imperil the bancroft. If the kermit is extempore and the kermit does not chase the bancroft then the bancroft is not extempore. If the vachel does not need the bancroft then the bancroft express the vachel. The lorelle is cheliceral.", "logic": "\nExpress(lorelle, kermit)\nAmalgamate(lorelle, kermit)\nCheliceral(kermit)\nAmalgamate(kermit, vachel)\nExpress(vachel, lorelle)\nExpress(vachel, bancroft)\nUnthought(vachel)\nCheliceral(vachel)\nPimply(vachel)\nAmalgamate(vachel, bancroft)\nExpress(bancroft, lorelle)\nExtempore(bancroft)\nAmalgamate(bancroft, lorelle)\nnot Amalgamate(bancroft, vachel)\nnot Imperil(bancroft, vachel)\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) -> Imperil(x, bancroft))\nforall x (Imperil(x, bancroft) -> Pimply(x))\nforall x (Pimply(x) -> Bustling(x))\nnot Express(kermit, vachel) and not Imperil(kermit, vachel) -> not Cheliceral(kermit)\nAmalgamate(kermit, lorelle) -> not Imperil(kermit, lorelle)\nforall x (Amalgamate(x, lorelle) -> Imperil(lorelle, bancroft))\nExtempore(kermit) and not Express(kermit, bancroft) -> not Extempore(bancroft)\nnot Imperil(vachel, bancroft) -> Express(bancroft, vachel)\n\nCheliceral(lorelle)\n\nCheliceral(lorelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The mariann grok the powell. The mariann grok the dasya. The powell is mutative. The tomkin grok the dasya. The tomkin is asteroidal. The tomkin reopen the mariann. The tomkin intubate the dasya. The dasya is asteroidal. The dasya is depletable. The dasya reopen the mariann. If someone grok the mariann then the mariann intubate the tomkin. If someone grok the mariann then they eat the dasya. Cold people are overactive. If the mariann reopen the dasya and the dasya is not depletable then the dasya is not mutative. If someone intubate the mariann then the mariann is depletable. If someone is overactive then they eat the mariann. If someone intubate the tomkin then the tomkin does not like the dasya. If someone grok the tomkin and the tomkin does not like the dasya then the tomkin is not aryan. The tomkin is asteroidal.", "logic": "\nGrok(mariann, powell)\nGrok(mariann, dasya)\nMutative(powell)\nGrok(tomkin, dasya)\nAsteroidal(tomkin)\nReopen(tomkin, mariann)\nIntubate(tomkin, dasya)\nAsteroidal(dasya)\nDepletable(dasya)\nReopen(dasya, mariann)\nforall x (Grok(x, mariann) -> Intubate(mariann, tomkin))\nforall x (Grok(x, mariann) -> Grok(x, dasya))\nforall x (Mutative(x) -> Overactive(x))\nReopen(mariann, dasya) and not Depletable(dasya) -> not Mutative(dasya)\nforall x (Intubate(x, mariann) -> Depletable(mariann))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Grok(x, mariann))\nforall x (Intubate(x, tomkin) -> not Reopen(tomkin, dasya))\nforall x (Grok(x, tomkin) and not Reopen(tomkin, dasya) -> not Aryan(tomkin))\n\nAsteroidal(tomkin)\n\ntherefore Asteroidal(tomkin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The lucienne devolve the reginauld. The lucienne devolve the euphemia. The reginauld is throaty. The aziz devolve the euphemia. The aziz is vague. The aziz conk the lucienne. The aziz exult the euphemia. The euphemia is vague. The euphemia is lilting. The euphemia conk the lucienne. If someone devolve the lucienne then the lucienne exult the aziz. If someone devolve the lucienne then they eat the euphemia. Cold people are boughed. If the lucienne conk the euphemia and the euphemia is not lilting then the euphemia is not throaty. If someone exult the lucienne then the lucienne is lilting. If someone is boughed then they eat the lucienne. If someone exult the aziz then the aziz does not like the euphemia. If someone devolve the aziz and the aziz does not like the euphemia then the aziz is not agonised. The lucienne does not eat the reginauld.", "logic": "\nDevolve(lucienne, reginauld)\nDevolve(lucienne, euphemia)\nThroaty(reginauld)\nDevolve(aziz, euphemia)\nVague(aziz)\nConk(aziz, lucienne)\nExult(aziz, euphemia)\nVague(euphemia)\nLilting(euphemia)\nConk(euphemia, lucienne)\nforall x (Devolve(x, lucienne) -> Exult(lucienne, aziz))\nforall x (Devolve(x, lucienne) -> Devolve(x, euphemia))\nforall x (Throaty(x) -> Boughed(x))\nConk(lucienne, euphemia) and not Lilting(euphemia) -> not Throaty(euphemia)\nforall x (Exult(x, lucienne) -> Lilting(lucienne))\nforall x (Boughed(x) -> Devolve(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Exult(x, aziz) -> not Conk(aziz, euphemia))\nforall x (Devolve(x, aziz) and not Conk(aziz, euphemia) -> not Agonised(aziz))\n\nnot Devolve(lucienne, reginauld)\n\ntherefore Devolve(lucienne, reginauld)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The kessia nuke the steffen. The kessia nuke the anny. The steffen is unsound. The maxim nuke the anny. The maxim is bright. The maxim combine the kessia. The maxim specify the anny. The anny is bright. The anny is unexceeded. The anny combine the kessia. If someone nuke the kessia then the kessia specify the maxim. If someone nuke the kessia then they eat the anny. Cold people are segregated. If the kessia combine the anny and the anny is not unexceeded then the anny is not unsound. If someone specify the kessia then the kessia is unexceeded. If someone is segregated then they eat the kessia. If someone specify the maxim then the maxim does not like the anny. If someone nuke the maxim and the maxim does not like the anny then the maxim is not sprawly. The steffen is segregated.", "logic": "\nNuke(kessia, steffen)\nNuke(kessia, anny)\nUnsound(steffen)\nNuke(maxim, anny)\nBright(maxim)\nCombine(maxim, kessia)\nSpecify(maxim, anny)\nBright(anny)\nUnexceeded(anny)\nCombine(anny, kessia)\nforall x (Nuke(x, kessia) -> Specify(kessia, maxim))\nforall x (Nuke(x, kessia) -> Nuke(x, anny))\nforall x (Unsound(x) -> Segregated(x))\nCombine(kessia, anny) and not Unexceeded(anny) -> not Unsound(anny)\nforall x (Specify(x, kessia) -> Unexceeded(kessia))\nforall x (Segregated(x) -> Nuke(x, kessia))\nforall x (Specify(x, maxim) -> not Combine(maxim, anny))\nforall x (Nuke(x, maxim) and not Combine(maxim, anny) -> not Sprawly(maxim))\n\nSegregated(steffen)\n\nUnsound(steffen) and forall x (Unsound(x) -> Segregated(x)) -> therefore Segregated(steffen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The laurene grasp the hernando. The laurene grasp the misti. The hernando is frothing. The ben grasp the misti. The ben is insanitary. The ben narrow the laurene. The ben rouge the misti. The misti is insanitary. The misti is irritative. The misti narrow the laurene. If someone grasp the laurene then the laurene rouge the ben. If someone grasp the laurene then they eat the misti. Cold people are soldierly. If the laurene narrow the misti and the misti is not irritative then the misti is not frothing. If someone rouge the laurene then the laurene is irritative. If someone is soldierly then they eat the laurene. If someone rouge the ben then the ben does not like the misti. If someone grasp the ben and the ben does not like the misti then the ben is not lowered. The hernando is not soldierly.", "logic": "\nGrasp(laurene, hernando)\nGrasp(laurene, misti)\nFrothing(hernando)\nGrasp(ben, misti)\nInsanitary(ben)\nNarrow(ben, laurene)\nRouge(ben, misti)\nInsanitary(misti)\nIrritative(misti)\nNarrow(misti, laurene)\nforall x (Grasp(x, laurene) -> Rouge(laurene, ben))\nforall x (Grasp(x, laurene) -> Grasp(x, misti))\nforall x (Frothing(x) -> Soldierly(x))\nNarrow(laurene, misti) and not Irritative(misti) -> not Frothing(misti)\nforall x (Rouge(x, laurene) -> Irritative(laurene))\nforall x (Soldierly(x) -> Grasp(x, laurene))\nforall x (Rouge(x, ben) -> not Narrow(ben, misti))\nforall x (Grasp(x, ben) and not Narrow(ben, misti) -> not Lowered(ben))\n\nnot Soldierly(hernando)\n\nFrothing(hernando) and forall x (Frothing(x) -> Soldierly(x)) -> therefore Soldierly(hernando)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The rickey adjoin the shellie. The rickey adjoin the sisile. The shellie is suburban. The lurette adjoin the sisile. The lurette is vinaceous. The lurette maximize the rickey. The lurette ejaculate the sisile. The sisile is vinaceous. The sisile is world. The sisile maximize the rickey. If someone adjoin the rickey then the rickey ejaculate the lurette. If someone adjoin the rickey then they eat the sisile. Cold people are acapnial. If the rickey maximize the sisile and the sisile is not world then the sisile is not suburban. If someone ejaculate the rickey then the rickey is world. If someone is acapnial then they eat the rickey. If someone ejaculate the lurette then the lurette does not like the sisile. If someone adjoin the lurette and the lurette does not like the sisile then the lurette is not sublimate. The shellie adjoin the rickey.", "logic": "\nAdjoin(rickey, shellie)\nAdjoin(rickey, sisile)\nSuburban(shellie)\nAdjoin(lurette, sisile)\nVinaceous(lurette)\nMaximize(lurette, rickey)\nEjaculate(lurette, sisile)\nVinaceous(sisile)\nWorld(sisile)\nMaximize(sisile, rickey)\nforall x (Adjoin(x, rickey) -> Ejaculate(rickey, lurette))\nforall x (Adjoin(x, rickey) -> Adjoin(x, sisile))\nforall x (Suburban(x) -> Acapnial(x))\nMaximize(rickey, sisile) and not World(sisile) -> not Suburban(sisile)\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, rickey) -> World(rickey))\nforall x (Acapnial(x) -> Adjoin(x, rickey))\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, lurette) -> not Maximize(lurette, sisile))\nforall x (Adjoin(x, lurette) and not Maximize(lurette, sisile) -> not Sublimate(lurette))\n\nAdjoin(shellie, rickey)\n\nSuburban(shellie) and forall x (Suburban(x) -> Acapnial(x)) -> therefore Acapnial(shellie) Acapnial(shellie) and forall x (Acapnial(x) -> Adjoin(x, rickey)) -> therefore Adjoin(shellie, rickey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The maure privilege the nathanael. The maure privilege the silvie. The nathanael is maxi. The geo privilege the silvie. The geo is extrinsic. The geo inscribe the maure. The geo pivot the silvie. The silvie is extrinsic. The silvie is fabulous. The silvie inscribe the maure. If someone privilege the maure then the maure pivot the geo. If someone privilege the maure then they eat the silvie. Cold people are bygone. If the maure inscribe the silvie and the silvie is not fabulous then the silvie is not maxi. If someone pivot the maure then the maure is fabulous. If someone is bygone then they eat the maure. If someone pivot the geo then the geo does not like the silvie. If someone privilege the geo and the geo does not like the silvie then the geo is not overheated. The nathanael does not eat the maure.", "logic": "\nPrivilege(maure, nathanael)\nPrivilege(maure, silvie)\nMaxi(nathanael)\nPrivilege(geo, silvie)\nExtrinsic(geo)\nInscribe(geo, maure)\nPivot(geo, silvie)\nExtrinsic(silvie)\nFabulous(silvie)\nInscribe(silvie, maure)\nforall x (Privilege(x, maure) -> Pivot(maure, geo))\nforall x (Privilege(x, maure) -> Privilege(x, silvie))\nforall x (Maxi(x) -> Bygone(x))\nInscribe(maure, silvie) and not Fabulous(silvie) -> not Maxi(silvie)\nforall x (Pivot(x, maure) -> Fabulous(maure))\nforall x (Bygone(x) -> Privilege(x, maure))\nforall x (Pivot(x, geo) -> not Inscribe(geo, silvie))\nforall x (Privilege(x, geo) and not Inscribe(geo, silvie) -> not Overheated(geo))\n\nnot Privilege(nathanael, maure)\n\nMaxi(nathanael) and forall x (Maxi(x) -> Bygone(x)) -> therefore Bygone(nathanael) Bygone(nathanael) and forall x (Bygone(x) -> Privilege(x, maure)) -> therefore Privilege(nathanael, maure)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The lotte sojourn the deb. The lotte sojourn the bernardo. The deb is zigzag. The chanda sojourn the bernardo. The chanda is hispanic. The chanda jolt the lotte. The chanda pasteurize the bernardo. The bernardo is hispanic. The bernardo is dispersed. The bernardo jolt the lotte. If someone sojourn the lotte then the lotte pasteurize the chanda. If someone sojourn the lotte then they eat the bernardo. Cold people are indexless. If the lotte jolt the bernardo and the bernardo is not dispersed then the bernardo is not zigzag. If someone pasteurize the lotte then the lotte is dispersed. If someone is indexless then they eat the lotte. If someone pasteurize the chanda then the chanda does not like the bernardo. If someone sojourn the chanda and the chanda does not like the bernardo then the chanda is not armlike. The lotte pasteurize the chanda.", "logic": "\nSojourn(lotte, deb)\nSojourn(lotte, bernardo)\nZigzag(deb)\nSojourn(chanda, bernardo)\nHispanic(chanda)\nJolt(chanda, lotte)\nPasteurize(chanda, bernardo)\nHispanic(bernardo)\nDispersed(bernardo)\nJolt(bernardo, lotte)\nforall x (Sojourn(x, lotte) -> Pasteurize(lotte, chanda))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, lotte) -> Sojourn(x, bernardo))\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> Indexless(x))\nJolt(lotte, bernardo) and not Dispersed(bernardo) -> not Zigzag(bernardo)\nforall x (Pasteurize(x, lotte) -> Dispersed(lotte))\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Sojourn(x, lotte))\nforall x (Pasteurize(x, chanda) -> not Jolt(chanda, bernardo))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, chanda) and not Jolt(chanda, bernardo) -> not Armlike(chanda))\n\nPasteurize(lotte, chanda)\n\nZigzag(deb) and forall x (Zigzag(x) -> Indexless(x)) -> therefore Indexless(deb) Indexless(deb) and forall x (Indexless(x) -> Sojourn(x, lotte)) -> therefore Sojourn(deb, lotte) Sojourn(deb, lotte) and forall x (Sojourn(x, lotte) -> Pasteurize(lotte, chanda)) -> therefore Pasteurize(lotte, chanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The owen tempt the shannen. The owen tempt the talia. The shannen is orbitual. The ignatius tempt the talia. The ignatius is uninfected. The ignatius guffaw the owen. The ignatius realine the talia. The talia is uninfected. The talia is helpful. The talia guffaw the owen. If someone tempt the owen then the owen realine the ignatius. If someone tempt the owen then they eat the talia. Cold people are homespun. If the owen guffaw the talia and the talia is not helpful then the talia is not orbitual. If someone realine the owen then the owen is helpful. If someone is homespun then they eat the owen. If someone realine the ignatius then the ignatius does not like the talia. If someone tempt the ignatius and the ignatius does not like the talia then the ignatius is not unpleasing. The shannen does not eat the talia.", "logic": "\nTempt(owen, shannen)\nTempt(owen, talia)\nOrbitual(shannen)\nTempt(ignatius, talia)\nUninfected(ignatius)\nGuffaw(ignatius, owen)\nRealine(ignatius, talia)\nUninfected(talia)\nHelpful(talia)\nGuffaw(talia, owen)\nforall x (Tempt(x, owen) -> Realine(owen, ignatius))\nforall x (Tempt(x, owen) -> Tempt(x, talia))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Homespun(x))\nGuffaw(owen, talia) and not Helpful(talia) -> not Orbitual(talia)\nforall x (Realine(x, owen) -> Helpful(owen))\nforall x (Homespun(x) -> Tempt(x, owen))\nforall x (Realine(x, ignatius) -> not Guffaw(ignatius, talia))\nforall x (Tempt(x, ignatius) and not Guffaw(ignatius, talia) -> not Unpleasing(ignatius))\n\nnot Tempt(shannen, talia)\n\nOrbitual(shannen) and forall x (Orbitual(x) -> Homespun(x)) -> therefore Homespun(shannen) Homespun(shannen) and forall x (Homespun(x) -> Tempt(x, owen)) -> therefore Tempt(shannen, owen) Tempt(shannen, owen) and forall x (Tempt(x, owen) -> Tempt(x, talia)) -> therefore Tempt(shannen, talia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The ellis politicize the nan. The ellis politicize the doralyn. The nan is phyllodial. The tamarra politicize the doralyn. The tamarra is edentulate. The tamarra whitewash the ellis. The tamarra agitate the doralyn. The doralyn is edentulate. The doralyn is splotched. The doralyn whitewash the ellis. If someone politicize the ellis then the ellis agitate the tamarra. If someone politicize the ellis then they eat the doralyn. Cold people are industrial. If the ellis whitewash the doralyn and the doralyn is not splotched then the doralyn is not phyllodial. If someone agitate the ellis then the ellis is splotched. If someone is industrial then they eat the ellis. If someone agitate the tamarra then the tamarra does not like the doralyn. If someone politicize the tamarra and the tamarra does not like the doralyn then the tamarra is not keen. The doralyn does not eat the ellis.", "logic": "\nPoliticize(ellis, nan)\nPoliticize(ellis, doralyn)\nPhyllodial(nan)\nPoliticize(tamarra, doralyn)\nEdentulate(tamarra)\nWhitewash(tamarra, ellis)\nAgitate(tamarra, doralyn)\nEdentulate(doralyn)\nSplotched(doralyn)\nWhitewash(doralyn, ellis)\nforall x (Politicize(x, ellis) -> Agitate(ellis, tamarra))\nforall x (Politicize(x, ellis) -> Politicize(x, doralyn))\nforall x (Phyllodial(x) -> Industrial(x))\nWhitewash(ellis, doralyn) and not Splotched(doralyn) -> not Phyllodial(doralyn)\nforall x (Agitate(x, ellis) -> Splotched(ellis))\nforall x (Industrial(x) -> Politicize(x, ellis))\nforall x (Agitate(x, tamarra) -> not Whitewash(tamarra, doralyn))\nforall x (Politicize(x, tamarra) and not Whitewash(tamarra, doralyn) -> not Keen(tamarra))\n\nnot Politicize(doralyn, ellis)\n\nforall x (Industrial(x) -> Politicize(x, ellis)) <- forall x (Phyllodial(x) -> Industrial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The charley donate the pieter. The charley donate the harman. The pieter is poor. The raleigh donate the harman. The raleigh is sedgelike. The raleigh convert the charley. The raleigh knot the harman. The harman is sedgelike. The harman is breeding. The harman convert the charley. If someone donate the charley then the charley knot the raleigh. If someone donate the charley then they eat the harman. Cold people are calycular. If the charley convert the harman and the harman is not breeding then the harman is not poor. If someone knot the charley then the charley is breeding. If someone is calycular then they eat the charley. If someone knot the raleigh then the raleigh does not like the harman. If someone donate the raleigh and the raleigh does not like the harman then the raleigh is not orthoptic. The charley donate the charley.", "logic": "\nDonate(charley, pieter)\nDonate(charley, harman)\nPoor(pieter)\nDonate(raleigh, harman)\nSedgelike(raleigh)\nConvert(raleigh, charley)\nKnot(raleigh, harman)\nSedgelike(harman)\nBreeding(harman)\nConvert(harman, charley)\nforall x (Donate(x, charley) -> Knot(charley, raleigh))\nforall x (Donate(x, charley) -> Donate(x, harman))\nforall x (Poor(x) -> Calycular(x))\nConvert(charley, harman) and not Breeding(harman) -> not Poor(harman)\nforall x (Knot(x, charley) -> Breeding(charley))\nforall x (Calycular(x) -> Donate(x, charley))\nforall x (Knot(x, raleigh) -> not Convert(raleigh, harman))\nforall x (Donate(x, raleigh) and not Convert(raleigh, harman) -> not Orthoptic(raleigh))\n\nDonate(charley, charley)\n\nforall x (Calycular(x) -> Donate(x, charley)) <- forall x (Poor(x) -> Calycular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The jany overcook the korie. The jany overcook the allin. The korie is expiatory. The goldarina overcook the allin. The goldarina is propellent. The goldarina distil the jany. The goldarina putrefy the allin. The allin is propellent. The allin is fleeting. The allin distil the jany. If someone overcook the jany then the jany putrefy the goldarina. If someone overcook the jany then they eat the allin. Cold people are coseismal. If the jany distil the allin and the allin is not fleeting then the allin is not expiatory. If someone putrefy the jany then the jany is fleeting. If someone is coseismal then they eat the jany. If someone putrefy the goldarina then the goldarina does not like the allin. If someone overcook the goldarina and the goldarina does not like the allin then the goldarina is not divergent. The jany is not fleeting.", "logic": "\nOvercook(jany, korie)\nOvercook(jany, allin)\nExpiatory(korie)\nOvercook(goldarina, allin)\nPropellent(goldarina)\nDistil(goldarina, jany)\nPutrefy(goldarina, allin)\nPropellent(allin)\nFleeting(allin)\nDistil(allin, jany)\nforall x (Overcook(x, jany) -> Putrefy(jany, goldarina))\nforall x (Overcook(x, jany) -> Overcook(x, allin))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nDistil(jany, allin) and not Fleeting(allin) -> not Expiatory(allin)\nforall x (Putrefy(x, jany) -> Fleeting(jany))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) -> Overcook(x, jany))\nforall x (Putrefy(x, goldarina) -> not Distil(goldarina, allin))\nforall x (Overcook(x, goldarina) and not Distil(goldarina, allin) -> not Divergent(goldarina))\n\nnot Fleeting(jany)\n\nforall x (Putrefy(x, jany) -> Fleeting(jany)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The clerissa reheel the laural. The clerissa reheel the katherina. The laural is innoxious. The noell reheel the katherina. The noell is medical. The noell spirit the clerissa. The noell recommend the katherina. The katherina is medical. The katherina is obovate. The katherina spirit the clerissa. If someone reheel the clerissa then the clerissa recommend the noell. If someone reheel the clerissa then they eat the katherina. Cold people are behindhand. If the clerissa spirit the katherina and the katherina is not obovate then the katherina is not innoxious. If someone recommend the clerissa then the clerissa is obovate. If someone is behindhand then they eat the clerissa. If someone recommend the noell then the noell does not like the katherina. If someone reheel the noell and the noell does not like the katherina then the noell is not hyaloid. The katherina is behindhand.", "logic": "\nReheel(clerissa, laural)\nReheel(clerissa, katherina)\nInnoxious(laural)\nReheel(noell, katherina)\nMedical(noell)\nSpirit(noell, clerissa)\nRecommend(noell, katherina)\nMedical(katherina)\nObovate(katherina)\nSpirit(katherina, clerissa)\nforall x (Reheel(x, clerissa) -> Recommend(clerissa, noell))\nforall x (Reheel(x, clerissa) -> Reheel(x, katherina))\nforall x (Innoxious(x) -> Behindhand(x))\nSpirit(clerissa, katherina) and not Obovate(katherina) -> not Innoxious(katherina)\nforall x (Recommend(x, clerissa) -> Obovate(clerissa))\nforall x (Behindhand(x) -> Reheel(x, clerissa))\nforall x (Recommend(x, noell) -> not Spirit(noell, katherina))\nforall x (Reheel(x, noell) and not Spirit(noell, katherina) -> not Hyaloid(noell))\n\nBehindhand(katherina)\n\nforall x (Innoxious(x) -> Behindhand(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The joyan clink the hannibal. The joyan clink the tamera. The hannibal is mucinous. The nona clink the tamera. The nona is moralistic. The nona reside the joyan. The nona saltate the tamera. The tamera is moralistic. The tamera is personable. The tamera reside the joyan. If someone clink the joyan then the joyan saltate the nona. If someone clink the joyan then they eat the tamera. Cold people are afflictive. If the joyan reside the tamera and the tamera is not personable then the tamera is not mucinous. If someone saltate the joyan then the joyan is personable. If someone is afflictive then they eat the joyan. If someone saltate the nona then the nona does not like the tamera. If someone clink the nona and the nona does not like the tamera then the nona is not sagging. The nona does not like the hannibal.", "logic": "\nClink(joyan, hannibal)\nClink(joyan, tamera)\nMucinous(hannibal)\nClink(nona, tamera)\nMoralistic(nona)\nReside(nona, joyan)\nSaltate(nona, tamera)\nMoralistic(tamera)\nPersonable(tamera)\nReside(tamera, joyan)\nforall x (Clink(x, joyan) -> Saltate(joyan, nona))\nforall x (Clink(x, joyan) -> Clink(x, tamera))\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nReside(joyan, tamera) and not Personable(tamera) -> not Mucinous(tamera)\nforall x (Saltate(x, joyan) -> Personable(joyan))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) -> Clink(x, joyan))\nforall x (Saltate(x, nona) -> not Reside(nona, tamera))\nforall x (Clink(x, nona) and not Reside(nona, tamera) -> not Sagging(nona))\n\nnot Reside(nona, hannibal)\n\nnot Reside(nona, hannibal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The blanch reassess the carlota. The blanch reassess the cora. The carlota is subfusc. The viva reassess the cora. The viva is clothed. The viva prepay the blanch. The viva reecho the cora. The cora is clothed. The cora is syllabled. The cora prepay the blanch. If someone reassess the blanch then the blanch reecho the viva. If someone reassess the blanch then they eat the cora. Cold people are unmelodic. If the blanch prepay the cora and the cora is not syllabled then the cora is not subfusc. If someone reecho the blanch then the blanch is syllabled. If someone is unmelodic then they eat the blanch. If someone reecho the viva then the viva does not like the cora. If someone reassess the viva and the viva does not like the cora then the viva is not gradual. The blanch reecho the carlota.", "logic": "\nReassess(blanch, carlota)\nReassess(blanch, cora)\nSubfusc(carlota)\nReassess(viva, cora)\nClothed(viva)\nPrepay(viva, blanch)\nReecho(viva, cora)\nClothed(cora)\nSyllabled(cora)\nPrepay(cora, blanch)\nforall x (Reassess(x, blanch) -> Reecho(blanch, viva))\nforall x (Reassess(x, blanch) -> Reassess(x, cora))\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Unmelodic(x))\nPrepay(blanch, cora) and not Syllabled(cora) -> not Subfusc(cora)\nforall x (Reecho(x, blanch) -> Syllabled(blanch))\nforall x (Unmelodic(x) -> Reassess(x, blanch))\nforall x (Reecho(x, viva) -> not Prepay(viva, cora))\nforall x (Reassess(x, viva) and not Prepay(viva, cora) -> not Gradual(viva))\n\nReecho(blanch, carlota)\n\nReecho(blanch, carlota) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The roberto crap the iggie. The roberto crap the lazlo. The iggie is drenched. The matilde crap the lazlo. The matilde is tartaric. The matilde chant the roberto. The matilde gargle the lazlo. The lazlo is tartaric. The lazlo is unassisted. The lazlo chant the roberto. If someone crap the roberto then the roberto gargle the matilde. If someone crap the roberto then they eat the lazlo. Cold people are wrenching. If the roberto chant the lazlo and the lazlo is not unassisted then the lazlo is not drenched. If someone gargle the roberto then the roberto is unassisted. If someone is wrenching then they eat the roberto. If someone gargle the matilde then the matilde does not like the lazlo. If someone crap the matilde and the matilde does not like the lazlo then the matilde is not elliptic. The roberto does not like the roberto.", "logic": "\nCrap(roberto, iggie)\nCrap(roberto, lazlo)\nDrenched(iggie)\nCrap(matilde, lazlo)\nTartaric(matilde)\nChant(matilde, roberto)\nGargle(matilde, lazlo)\nTartaric(lazlo)\nUnassisted(lazlo)\nChant(lazlo, roberto)\nforall x (Crap(x, roberto) -> Gargle(roberto, matilde))\nforall x (Crap(x, roberto) -> Crap(x, lazlo))\nforall x (Drenched(x) -> Wrenching(x))\nChant(roberto, lazlo) and not Unassisted(lazlo) -> not Drenched(lazlo)\nforall x (Gargle(x, roberto) -> Unassisted(roberto))\nforall x (Wrenching(x) -> Crap(x, roberto))\nforall x (Gargle(x, matilde) -> not Chant(matilde, lazlo))\nforall x (Crap(x, matilde) and not Chant(matilde, lazlo) -> not Elliptic(matilde))\n\nnot Chant(roberto, roberto)\n\nnot Chant(roberto, roberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The josefa prospect the tatiana. The josefa prospect the darcey. The tatiana is araceous. The hercules prospect the darcey. The hercules is agitative. The hercules excoriate the josefa. The hercules blame the darcey. The darcey is agitative. The darcey is cubist. The darcey excoriate the josefa. If someone prospect the josefa then the josefa blame the hercules. If someone prospect the josefa then they eat the darcey. Cold people are desiccate. If the josefa excoriate the darcey and the darcey is not cubist then the darcey is not araceous. If someone blame the josefa then the josefa is cubist. If someone is desiccate then they eat the josefa. If someone blame the hercules then the hercules does not like the darcey. If someone prospect the hercules and the hercules does not like the darcey then the hercules is not sundry. The tatiana is sundry.", "logic": "\nProspect(josefa, tatiana)\nProspect(josefa, darcey)\nAraceous(tatiana)\nProspect(hercules, darcey)\nAgitative(hercules)\nExcoriate(hercules, josefa)\nBlame(hercules, darcey)\nAgitative(darcey)\nCubist(darcey)\nExcoriate(darcey, josefa)\nforall x (Prospect(x, josefa) -> Blame(josefa, hercules))\nforall x (Prospect(x, josefa) -> Prospect(x, darcey))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> Desiccate(x))\nExcoriate(josefa, darcey) and not Cubist(darcey) -> not Araceous(darcey)\nforall x (Blame(x, josefa) -> Cubist(josefa))\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> Prospect(x, josefa))\nforall x (Blame(x, hercules) -> not Excoriate(hercules, darcey))\nforall x (Prospect(x, hercules) and not Excoriate(hercules, darcey) -> not Sundry(hercules))\n\nSundry(tatiana)\n\nSundry(tatiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "Giralda is pacifistic. Giralda is lxxxiii. Ragnar is unbaptised. Ragnar is antithetic. Ragnar is flyaway. Ragnar is politic. Ragnar is embryotic. Ragnar is lxxxiii. Caty is unbaptised. Caty is pacifistic. Caty is antithetic. Caty is flyaway. Caty is politic. Caty is embryotic. Caty is lxxxiii. All unbaptised things are embryotic. Smart, antithetic things are flyaway. All embryotic things are antithetic. If something is politic then it is lxxxiii. Green things are embryotic. If something is politic and unbaptised then it is embryotic. Ragnar is embryotic.", "logic": "\nPacifistic(giralda)\nLxxxiii(giralda)\nUnbaptised(ragnar)\nAntithetic(ragnar)\nFlyaway(ragnar)\nPolitic(ragnar)\nEmbryotic(ragnar)\nLxxxiii(ragnar)\nUnbaptised(caty)\nPacifistic(caty)\nAntithetic(caty)\nFlyaway(caty)\nPolitic(caty)\nEmbryotic(caty)\nLxxxiii(caty)\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) and Antithetic(x) -> Flyaway(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Politic(x) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Pacifistic(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Politic(x) and Unbaptised(x) -> Embryotic(x))\n\nEmbryotic(ragnar)\n\ntherefore Embryotic(ragnar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Maryl is unasked. Maryl is responsive. Ainslee is ionic. Ainslee is mortgaged. Ainslee is formative. Ainslee is wondrous. Ainslee is unpotted. Ainslee is responsive. Sheffield is ionic. Sheffield is unasked. Sheffield is mortgaged. Sheffield is formative. Sheffield is wondrous. Sheffield is unpotted. Sheffield is responsive. All ionic things are unpotted. Smart, mortgaged things are formative. All unpotted things are mortgaged. If something is wondrous then it is responsive. Green things are unpotted. If something is wondrous and ionic then it is unpotted. Ainslee is not wondrous.", "logic": "\nUnasked(maryl)\nResponsive(maryl)\nIonic(ainslee)\nMortgaged(ainslee)\nFormative(ainslee)\nWondrous(ainslee)\nUnpotted(ainslee)\nResponsive(ainslee)\nIonic(sheffield)\nUnasked(sheffield)\nMortgaged(sheffield)\nFormative(sheffield)\nWondrous(sheffield)\nUnpotted(sheffield)\nResponsive(sheffield)\nforall x (Ionic(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) and Mortgaged(x) -> Formative(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Responsive(x))\nforall x (Unasked(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) and Ionic(x) -> Unpotted(x))\n\nnot Wondrous(ainslee)\n\ntherefore Wondrous(ainslee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Cosetta is windy. Cosetta is ruminant. Roddy is miry. Roddy is recondite. Roddy is civilized. Roddy is factious. Roddy is autolytic. Roddy is ruminant. Werner is miry. Werner is windy. Werner is recondite. Werner is civilized. Werner is factious. Werner is autolytic. Werner is ruminant. All miry things are autolytic. Smart, recondite things are civilized. All autolytic things are recondite. If something is factious then it is ruminant. Green things are autolytic. If something is factious and miry then it is autolytic. Cosetta is autolytic.", "logic": "\nWindy(cosetta)\nRuminant(cosetta)\nMiry(roddy)\nRecondite(roddy)\nCivilized(roddy)\nFactious(roddy)\nAutolytic(roddy)\nRuminant(roddy)\nMiry(werner)\nWindy(werner)\nRecondite(werner)\nCivilized(werner)\nFactious(werner)\nAutolytic(werner)\nRuminant(werner)\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Autolytic(x))\nforall x (Autolytic(x) and Recondite(x) -> Civilized(x))\nforall x (Autolytic(x) -> Recondite(x))\nforall x (Factious(x) -> Ruminant(x))\nforall x (Windy(x) -> Autolytic(x))\nforall x (Factious(x) and Miry(x) -> Autolytic(x))\n\nAutolytic(cosetta)\n\nWindy(cosetta) and forall x (Windy(x) -> Autolytic(x)) -> therefore Autolytic(cosetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Jere is burmese. Jere is bubonic. Chelsae is diastolic. Chelsae is accurst. Chelsae is messy. Chelsae is feeble. Chelsae is accepting. Chelsae is bubonic. Annabal is diastolic. Annabal is burmese. Annabal is accurst. Annabal is messy. Annabal is feeble. Annabal is accepting. Annabal is bubonic. All diastolic things are accepting. Smart, accurst things are messy. All accepting things are accurst. If something is feeble then it is bubonic. Green things are accepting. If something is feeble and diastolic then it is accepting. Jere is not accepting.", "logic": "\nBurmese(jere)\nBubonic(jere)\nDiastolic(chelsae)\nAccurst(chelsae)\nMessy(chelsae)\nFeeble(chelsae)\nAccepting(chelsae)\nBubonic(chelsae)\nDiastolic(annabal)\nBurmese(annabal)\nAccurst(annabal)\nMessy(annabal)\nFeeble(annabal)\nAccepting(annabal)\nBubonic(annabal)\nforall x (Diastolic(x) -> Accepting(x))\nforall x (Accepting(x) and Accurst(x) -> Messy(x))\nforall x (Accepting(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Feeble(x) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Burmese(x) -> Accepting(x))\nforall x (Feeble(x) and Diastolic(x) -> Accepting(x))\n\nnot Accepting(jere)\n\nBurmese(jere) and forall x (Burmese(x) -> Accepting(x)) -> therefore Accepting(jere)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Ardenia is blate. Ardenia is biovular. Ray is avirulent. Ray is evocative. Ray is tousled. Ray is widespread. Ray is untiring. Ray is biovular. Madel is avirulent. Madel is blate. Madel is evocative. Madel is tousled. Madel is widespread. Madel is untiring. Madel is biovular. All avirulent things are untiring. Smart, evocative things are tousled. All untiring things are evocative. If something is widespread then it is biovular. Green things are untiring. If something is widespread and avirulent then it is untiring. Ardenia is evocative.", "logic": "\nBlate(ardenia)\nBiovular(ardenia)\nAvirulent(ray)\nEvocative(ray)\nTousled(ray)\nWidespread(ray)\nUntiring(ray)\nBiovular(ray)\nAvirulent(madel)\nBlate(madel)\nEvocative(madel)\nTousled(madel)\nWidespread(madel)\nUntiring(madel)\nBiovular(madel)\nforall x (Avirulent(x) -> Untiring(x))\nforall x (Untiring(x) and Evocative(x) -> Tousled(x))\nforall x (Untiring(x) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Widespread(x) -> Biovular(x))\nforall x (Blate(x) -> Untiring(x))\nforall x (Widespread(x) and Avirulent(x) -> Untiring(x))\n\nEvocative(ardenia)\n\nBlate(ardenia) and forall x (Blate(x) -> Untiring(x)) -> therefore Untiring(ardenia) Untiring(ardenia) and forall x (Untiring(x) -> Evocative(x)) -> therefore Evocative(ardenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Frederick is unwrapped. Frederick is antheral. Deena is syncopated. Deena is sufferable. Deena is lissome. Deena is upset. Deena is ossified. Deena is antheral. Jeannette is syncopated. Jeannette is unwrapped. Jeannette is sufferable. Jeannette is lissome. Jeannette is upset. Jeannette is ossified. Jeannette is antheral. All syncopated things are ossified. Smart, sufferable things are lissome. All ossified things are sufferable. If something is upset then it is antheral. Green things are ossified. If something is upset and syncopated then it is ossified. Frederick is not sufferable.", "logic": "\nUnwrapped(frederick)\nAntheral(frederick)\nSyncopated(deena)\nSufferable(deena)\nLissome(deena)\nUpset(deena)\nOssified(deena)\nAntheral(deena)\nSyncopated(jeannette)\nUnwrapped(jeannette)\nSufferable(jeannette)\nLissome(jeannette)\nUpset(jeannette)\nOssified(jeannette)\nAntheral(jeannette)\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) and Sufferable(x) -> Lissome(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Upset(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Upset(x) and Syncopated(x) -> Ossified(x))\n\nnot Sufferable(frederick)\n\nUnwrapped(frederick) and forall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Ossified(x)) -> therefore Ossified(frederick) Ossified(frederick) and forall x (Ossified(x) -> Sufferable(x)) -> therefore Sufferable(frederick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Chere is buddhist. Chere is geared. Lorrie is suchlike. Lorrie is unlabeled. Lorrie is lxxxiv. Lorrie is sericeous. Lorrie is liquescent. Lorrie is geared. Cristin is suchlike. Cristin is buddhist. Cristin is unlabeled. Cristin is lxxxiv. Cristin is sericeous. Cristin is liquescent. Cristin is geared. All suchlike things are liquescent. Smart, unlabeled things are lxxxiv. All liquescent things are unlabeled. If something is sericeous then it is geared. Green things are liquescent. If something is sericeous and suchlike then it is liquescent. Chere is lxxxiv.", "logic": "\nBuddhist(chere)\nGeared(chere)\nSuchlike(lorrie)\nUnlabeled(lorrie)\nLxxxiv(lorrie)\nSericeous(lorrie)\nLiquescent(lorrie)\nGeared(lorrie)\nSuchlike(cristin)\nBuddhist(cristin)\nUnlabeled(cristin)\nLxxxiv(cristin)\nSericeous(cristin)\nLiquescent(cristin)\nGeared(cristin)\nforall x (Suchlike(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) and Unlabeled(x) -> Lxxxiv(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Buddhist(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Suchlike(x) -> Liquescent(x))\n\nLxxxiv(chere)\n\nBuddhist(chere) and forall x (Buddhist(x) -> Liquescent(x)) -> therefore Liquescent(chere) Buddhist(chere) and forall x (Buddhist(x) -> Liquescent(x)) -> therefore Liquescent(chere) Liquescent(chere) and forall x (Liquescent(x) -> Unlabeled(x)) -> therefore Unlabeled(chere) Liquescent(chere) and Unlabeled(chere) and forall x (Liquescent(x) and Unlabeled(x) -> Lxxxiv(x)) -> therefore Lxxxiv(chere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Gustavus is xvii. Gustavus is saddled. Reinhold is defined. Reinhold is ambagious. Reinhold is glutted. Reinhold is removable. Reinhold is comely. Reinhold is saddled. Armstrong is defined. Armstrong is xvii. Armstrong is ambagious. Armstrong is glutted. Armstrong is removable. Armstrong is comely. Armstrong is saddled. All defined things are comely. Smart, ambagious things are glutted. All comely things are ambagious. If something is removable then it is saddled. Green things are comely. If something is removable and defined then it is comely. Gustavus is not glutted.", "logic": "\nXvii(gustavus)\nSaddled(gustavus)\nDefined(reinhold)\nAmbagious(reinhold)\nGlutted(reinhold)\nRemovable(reinhold)\nComely(reinhold)\nSaddled(reinhold)\nDefined(armstrong)\nXvii(armstrong)\nAmbagious(armstrong)\nGlutted(armstrong)\nRemovable(armstrong)\nComely(armstrong)\nSaddled(armstrong)\nforall x (Defined(x) -> Comely(x))\nforall x (Comely(x) and Ambagious(x) -> Glutted(x))\nforall x (Comely(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Xvii(x) -> Comely(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) and Defined(x) -> Comely(x))\n\nnot Glutted(gustavus)\n\nXvii(gustavus) and forall x (Xvii(x) -> Comely(x)) -> therefore Comely(gustavus) Xvii(gustavus) and forall x (Xvii(x) -> Comely(x)) -> therefore Comely(gustavus) Comely(gustavus) and forall x (Comely(x) -> Ambagious(x)) -> therefore Ambagious(gustavus) Comely(gustavus) and Ambagious(gustavus) and forall x (Comely(x) and Ambagious(x) -> Glutted(x)) -> therefore Glutted(gustavus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Mariya is reconciled. Mariya is swarthy. Chandra is marvellous. Chandra is anginose. Chandra is remindful. Chandra is amyloid. Chandra is removable. Chandra is swarthy. Jacquie is marvellous. Jacquie is reconciled. Jacquie is anginose. Jacquie is remindful. Jacquie is amyloid. Jacquie is removable. Jacquie is swarthy. All marvellous things are removable. Smart, anginose things are remindful. All removable things are anginose. If something is amyloid then it is swarthy. Green things are removable. If something is amyloid and marvellous then it is removable. Mariya is not marvellous.", "logic": "\nReconciled(mariya)\nSwarthy(mariya)\nMarvellous(chandra)\nAnginose(chandra)\nRemindful(chandra)\nAmyloid(chandra)\nRemovable(chandra)\nSwarthy(chandra)\nMarvellous(jacquie)\nReconciled(jacquie)\nAnginose(jacquie)\nRemindful(jacquie)\nAmyloid(jacquie)\nRemovable(jacquie)\nSwarthy(jacquie)\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Removable(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) and Anginose(x) -> Remindful(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Anginose(x))\nforall x (Amyloid(x) -> Swarthy(x))\nforall x (Reconciled(x) -> Removable(x))\nforall x (Amyloid(x) and Marvellous(x) -> Removable(x))\n\nnot Marvellous(mariya)\n\nnot Marvellous(mariya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Wendeline is unknowable. Wendeline is spectral. Goldia is imposed. Goldia is cacogenic. Goldia is zimbabwean. Goldia is annelidan. Goldia is criterial. Goldia is spectral. Shaylynn is imposed. Shaylynn is unknowable. Shaylynn is cacogenic. Shaylynn is zimbabwean. Shaylynn is annelidan. Shaylynn is criterial. Shaylynn is spectral. All imposed things are criterial. Smart, cacogenic things are zimbabwean. All criterial things are cacogenic. If something is annelidan then it is spectral. Green things are criterial. If something is annelidan and imposed then it is criterial. Wendeline is annelidan.", "logic": "\nUnknowable(wendeline)\nSpectral(wendeline)\nImposed(goldia)\nCacogenic(goldia)\nZimbabwean(goldia)\nAnnelidan(goldia)\nCriterial(goldia)\nSpectral(goldia)\nImposed(shaylynn)\nUnknowable(shaylynn)\nCacogenic(shaylynn)\nZimbabwean(shaylynn)\nAnnelidan(shaylynn)\nCriterial(shaylynn)\nSpectral(shaylynn)\nforall x (Imposed(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Criterial(x) and Cacogenic(x) -> Zimbabwean(x))\nforall x (Criterial(x) -> Cacogenic(x))\nforall x (Annelidan(x) -> Spectral(x))\nforall x (Unknowable(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Annelidan(x) and Imposed(x) -> Criterial(x))\n\nAnnelidan(wendeline)\n\nAnnelidan(wendeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "The netty disinter the maryl. The maddie is approving. The faydra is statuesque. The maryl is statuesque. If someone rekindle the netty then the netty is statuesque. If someone disinter the maddie and they are ignitible then they need the maryl. If someone is chartered and ignitible then they need the maddie. If the maryl forget the faydra then the maryl is approving. If someone disinter the maddie and they chase the faydra then they are approving. If someone is statuesque then they see the netty. The netty disinter the maryl.", "logic": "\nDisinter(netty, maryl)\nApproving(maddie)\nStatuesque(faydra)\nStatuesque(maryl)\nforall x (Rekindle(x, netty) -> Statuesque(netty))\nforall x (Disinter(x, maddie) and Ignitible(x) -> Forget(x, maryl))\nforall x (Chartered(x) and Ignitible(x) -> Forget(x, maddie))\nForget(maryl, faydra) -> Approving(maryl)\nforall x (Disinter(x, maddie) and Disinter(x, faydra) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> Rekindle(x, netty))\n\nDisinter(netty, maryl)\n\ntherefore Disinter(netty, maryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The theodosia flail the caty. The shira is tropic. The yanaton is felonious. The caty is felonious. If someone solace the theodosia then the theodosia is felonious. If someone flail the shira and they are bohemian then they need the caty. If someone is clubfooted and bohemian then they need the shira. If the caty foray the yanaton then the caty is tropic. If someone flail the shira and they chase the yanaton then they are tropic. If someone is felonious then they see the theodosia. The caty is not felonious.", "logic": "\nFlail(theodosia, caty)\nTropic(shira)\nFelonious(yanaton)\nFelonious(caty)\nforall x (Solace(x, theodosia) -> Felonious(theodosia))\nforall x (Flail(x, shira) and Bohemian(x) -> Foray(x, caty))\nforall x (Clubfooted(x) and Bohemian(x) -> Foray(x, shira))\nForay(caty, yanaton) -> Tropic(caty)\nforall x (Flail(x, shira) and Flail(x, yanaton) -> Tropic(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) -> Solace(x, theodosia))\n\nnot Felonious(caty)\n\ntherefore Felonious(caty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The renaud didder the guillaume. The cathy is conceptual. The merlin is dissonant. The guillaume is dissonant. If someone sling the renaud then the renaud is dissonant. If someone didder the cathy and they are undreamed then they need the guillaume. If someone is enjoyable and undreamed then they need the cathy. If the guillaume rededicate the merlin then the guillaume is conceptual. If someone didder the cathy and they chase the merlin then they are conceptual. If someone is dissonant then they see the renaud. The guillaume sling the renaud.", "logic": "\nDidder(renaud, guillaume)\nConceptual(cathy)\nDissonant(merlin)\nDissonant(guillaume)\nforall x (Sling(x, renaud) -> Dissonant(renaud))\nforall x (Didder(x, cathy) and Undreamed(x) -> Rededicate(x, guillaume))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) and Undreamed(x) -> Rededicate(x, cathy))\nRededicate(guillaume, merlin) -> Conceptual(guillaume)\nforall x (Didder(x, cathy) and Didder(x, merlin) -> Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Sling(x, renaud))\n\nSling(guillaume, renaud)\n\nDissonant(guillaume) and forall x (Dissonant(x) -> Sling(x, renaud)) -> therefore Sling(guillaume, renaud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The susy aline the meris. The maria is spousal. The elfie is unhopeful. The meris is unhopeful. If someone kite the susy then the susy is unhopeful. If someone aline the maria and they are saurian then they need the meris. If someone is chilling and saurian then they need the maria. If the meris overdraw the elfie then the meris is spousal. If someone aline the maria and they chase the elfie then they are spousal. If someone is unhopeful then they see the susy. The meris does not see the susy.", "logic": "\nAline(susy, meris)\nSpousal(maria)\nUnhopeful(elfie)\nUnhopeful(meris)\nforall x (Kite(x, susy) -> Unhopeful(susy))\nforall x (Aline(x, maria) and Saurian(x) -> Overdraw(x, meris))\nforall x (Chilling(x) and Saurian(x) -> Overdraw(x, maria))\nOverdraw(meris, elfie) -> Spousal(meris)\nforall x (Aline(x, maria) and Aline(x, elfie) -> Spousal(x))\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) -> Kite(x, susy))\n\nnot Kite(meris, susy)\n\nUnhopeful(meris) and forall x (Unhopeful(x) -> Kite(x, susy)) -> therefore Kite(meris, susy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The adella headbutt the tasha. The clarita is outdated. The kent is growing. The tasha is growing. If someone equip the adella then the adella is growing. If someone headbutt the clarita and they are lazy then they need the tasha. If someone is unsaved and lazy then they need the clarita. If the tasha disgust the kent then the tasha is outdated. If someone headbutt the clarita and they chase the kent then they are outdated. If someone is growing then they see the adella. The adella is growing.", "logic": "\nHeadbutt(adella, tasha)\nOutdated(clarita)\nGrowing(kent)\nGrowing(tasha)\nforall x (Equip(x, adella) -> Growing(adella))\nforall x (Headbutt(x, clarita) and Lazy(x) -> Disgust(x, tasha))\nforall x (Unsaved(x) and Lazy(x) -> Disgust(x, clarita))\nDisgust(tasha, kent) -> Outdated(tasha)\nforall x (Headbutt(x, clarita) and Headbutt(x, kent) -> Outdated(x))\nforall x (Growing(x) -> Equip(x, adella))\n\nGrowing(adella)\n\nGrowing(kent) and forall x (Growing(x) -> Equip(x, adella)) -> therefore Equip(kent, adella) Equip(kent, adella) and forall x (Equip(x, adella) -> Growing(adella)) -> therefore Growing(adella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The joline suborn the dominic. The vijay is marshy. The breanne is visualised. The dominic is visualised. If someone delude the joline then the joline is visualised. If someone suborn the vijay and they are germane then they need the dominic. If someone is ebracteate and germane then they need the vijay. If the dominic omit the breanne then the dominic is marshy. If someone suborn the vijay and they chase the breanne then they are marshy. If someone is visualised then they see the joline. The joline is not visualised.", "logic": "\nSuborn(joline, dominic)\nMarshy(vijay)\nVisualised(breanne)\nVisualised(dominic)\nforall x (Delude(x, joline) -> Visualised(joline))\nforall x (Suborn(x, vijay) and Germane(x) -> Omit(x, dominic))\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) and Germane(x) -> Omit(x, vijay))\nOmit(dominic, breanne) -> Marshy(dominic)\nforall x (Suborn(x, vijay) and Suborn(x, breanne) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> Delude(x, joline))\n\nnot Visualised(joline)\n\nVisualised(breanne) and forall x (Visualised(x) -> Delude(x, joline)) -> therefore Delude(breanne, joline) Delude(breanne, joline) and forall x (Delude(x, joline) -> Visualised(joline)) -> therefore Visualised(joline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The spike realign the gerhardt. The chan is unbowed. The torin is fuddled. The gerhardt is fuddled. If someone detract the spike then the spike is fuddled. If someone realign the chan and they are lithuanian then they need the gerhardt. If someone is cerise and lithuanian then they need the chan. If the gerhardt outfight the torin then the gerhardt is unbowed. If someone realign the chan and they chase the torin then they are unbowed. If someone is fuddled then they see the spike. The spike detract the spike.", "logic": "\nRealign(spike, gerhardt)\nUnbowed(chan)\nFuddled(torin)\nFuddled(gerhardt)\nforall x (Detract(x, spike) -> Fuddled(spike))\nforall x (Realign(x, chan) and Lithuanian(x) -> Outfight(x, gerhardt))\nforall x (Cerise(x) and Lithuanian(x) -> Outfight(x, chan))\nOutfight(gerhardt, torin) -> Unbowed(gerhardt)\nforall x (Realign(x, chan) and Realign(x, torin) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Fuddled(x) -> Detract(x, spike))\n\nDetract(spike, spike)\n\nFuddled(torin) and forall x (Fuddled(x) -> Detract(x, spike)) -> therefore Detract(torin, spike) Detract(torin, spike) and forall x (Detract(x, spike) -> Fuddled(spike)) -> therefore Fuddled(spike) Fuddled(spike) and forall x (Fuddled(x) -> Detract(x, spike)) -> therefore Detract(spike, spike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The garland flame the isador. The jere is staged. The eryn is furnished. The isador is furnished. If someone bituminise the garland then the garland is furnished. If someone flame the jere and they are amethyst then they need the isador. If someone is dumpy and amethyst then they need the jere. If the isador innovate the eryn then the isador is staged. If someone flame the jere and they chase the eryn then they are staged. If someone is furnished then they see the garland. The garland does not see the garland.", "logic": "\nFlame(garland, isador)\nStaged(jere)\nFurnished(eryn)\nFurnished(isador)\nforall x (Bituminise(x, garland) -> Furnished(garland))\nforall x (Flame(x, jere) and Amethyst(x) -> Innovate(x, isador))\nforall x (Dumpy(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Innovate(x, jere))\nInnovate(isador, eryn) -> Staged(isador)\nforall x (Flame(x, jere) and Flame(x, eryn) -> Staged(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) -> Bituminise(x, garland))\n\nnot Bituminise(garland, garland)\n\nFurnished(eryn) and forall x (Furnished(x) -> Bituminise(x, garland)) -> therefore Bituminise(eryn, garland) Bituminise(eryn, garland) and forall x (Bituminise(x, garland) -> Furnished(garland)) -> therefore Furnished(garland) Furnished(garland) and forall x (Furnished(x) -> Bituminise(x, garland)) -> therefore Bituminise(garland, garland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The somerset avalanche the herman. The kareem is unnotched. The karole is lipped. The herman is lipped. If someone behead the somerset then the somerset is lipped. If someone avalanche the kareem and they are tiered then they need the herman. If someone is free and tiered then they need the kareem. If the herman patent the karole then the herman is unnotched. If someone avalanche the kareem and they chase the karole then they are unnotched. If someone is lipped then they see the somerset. The kareem does not need the herman.", "logic": "\nAvalanche(somerset, herman)\nUnnotched(kareem)\nLipped(karole)\nLipped(herman)\nforall x (Behead(x, somerset) -> Lipped(somerset))\nforall x (Avalanche(x, kareem) and Tiered(x) -> Patent(x, herman))\nforall x (Free(x) and Tiered(x) -> Patent(x, kareem))\nPatent(herman, karole) -> Unnotched(herman)\nforall x (Avalanche(x, kareem) and Avalanche(x, karole) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Lipped(x) -> Behead(x, somerset))\n\nnot Patent(kareem, herman)\n\nforall x (Avalanche(x, kareem) and Tiered(x) -> Patent(x, herman)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The leshia charleston the brooks. The emmalynn is squishy. The adrick is unweary. The brooks is unweary. If someone retry the leshia then the leshia is unweary. If someone charleston the emmalynn and they are woeful then they need the brooks. If someone is identical and woeful then they need the emmalynn. If the brooks withdraw the adrick then the brooks is squishy. If someone charleston the emmalynn and they chase the adrick then they are squishy. If someone is unweary then they see the leshia. The emmalynn retry the leshia.", "logic": "\nCharleston(leshia, brooks)\nSquishy(emmalynn)\nUnweary(adrick)\nUnweary(brooks)\nforall x (Retry(x, leshia) -> Unweary(leshia))\nforall x (Charleston(x, emmalynn) and Woeful(x) -> Withdraw(x, brooks))\nforall x (Identical(x) and Woeful(x) -> Withdraw(x, emmalynn))\nWithdraw(brooks, adrick) -> Squishy(brooks)\nforall x (Charleston(x, emmalynn) and Charleston(x, adrick) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Unweary(x) -> Retry(x, leshia))\n\nRetry(emmalynn, leshia)\n\nforall x (Unweary(x) -> Retry(x, leshia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The lynne pulverise the cammy. The leiah is adulterine. The kayley is unaffected. The cammy is unaffected. If someone berry the lynne then the lynne is unaffected. If someone pulverise the leiah and they are lucid then they need the cammy. If someone is sinewy and lucid then they need the leiah. If the cammy contort the kayley then the cammy is adulterine. If someone pulverise the leiah and they chase the kayley then they are adulterine. If someone is unaffected then they see the lynne. The kayley does not need the cammy.", "logic": "\nPulverise(lynne, cammy)\nAdulterine(leiah)\nUnaffected(kayley)\nUnaffected(cammy)\nforall x (Berry(x, lynne) -> Unaffected(lynne))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, leiah) and Lucid(x) -> Contort(x, cammy))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Lucid(x) -> Contort(x, leiah))\nContort(cammy, kayley) -> Adulterine(cammy)\nforall x (Pulverise(x, leiah) and Pulverise(x, kayley) -> Adulterine(x))\nforall x (Unaffected(x) -> Berry(x, lynne))\n\nnot Contort(kayley, cammy)\n\nforall x (Pulverise(x, leiah) and Lucid(x) -> Contort(x, cammy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The hilbert etch the nellie. The thalia is erosive. The lance is batrachian. The nellie is batrachian. If someone divert the hilbert then the hilbert is batrachian. If someone etch the thalia and they are germicidal then they need the nellie. If someone is gouty and germicidal then they need the thalia. If the nellie chicane the lance then the nellie is erosive. If someone etch the thalia and they chase the lance then they are erosive. If someone is batrachian then they see the hilbert. The hilbert is erosive.", "logic": "\nEtch(hilbert, nellie)\nErosive(thalia)\nBatrachian(lance)\nBatrachian(nellie)\nforall x (Divert(x, hilbert) -> Batrachian(hilbert))\nforall x (Etch(x, thalia) and Germicidal(x) -> Chicane(x, nellie))\nforall x (Gouty(x) and Germicidal(x) -> Chicane(x, thalia))\nChicane(nellie, lance) -> Erosive(nellie)\nforall x (Etch(x, thalia) and Etch(x, lance) -> Erosive(x))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) -> Divert(x, hilbert))\n\nErosive(hilbert)\n\nforall x (Etch(x, thalia) and Etch(x, lance) -> Erosive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The arlena impinge the lizzy. The bertina is unfeminine. The daile is hidebound. The lizzy is hidebound. If someone dally the arlena then the arlena is hidebound. If someone impinge the bertina and they are schmaltzy then they need the lizzy. If someone is zoic and schmaltzy then they need the bertina. If the lizzy mend the daile then the lizzy is unfeminine. If someone impinge the bertina and they chase the daile then they are unfeminine. If someone is hidebound then they see the arlena. The lizzy does not chase the bertina.", "logic": "\nImpinge(arlena, lizzy)\nUnfeminine(bertina)\nHidebound(daile)\nHidebound(lizzy)\nforall x (Dally(x, arlena) -> Hidebound(arlena))\nforall x (Impinge(x, bertina) and Schmaltzy(x) -> Mend(x, lizzy))\nforall x (Zoic(x) and Schmaltzy(x) -> Mend(x, bertina))\nMend(lizzy, daile) -> Unfeminine(lizzy)\nforall x (Impinge(x, bertina) and Impinge(x, daile) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Hidebound(x) -> Dally(x, arlena))\n\nnot Impinge(lizzy, bertina)\n\nnot Impinge(lizzy, bertina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The jaquith croak the leann. The catrina is patristic. The gipsy is lossy. The leann is lossy. If someone vulgarise the jaquith then the jaquith is lossy. If someone croak the catrina and they are most then they need the leann. If someone is trousered and most then they need the catrina. If the leann aggravate the gipsy then the leann is patristic. If someone croak the catrina and they chase the gipsy then they are patristic. If someone is lossy then they see the jaquith. The gipsy croak the leann.", "logic": "\nCroak(jaquith, leann)\nPatristic(catrina)\nLossy(gipsy)\nLossy(leann)\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, jaquith) -> Lossy(jaquith))\nforall x (Croak(x, catrina) and Most(x) -> Aggravate(x, leann))\nforall x (Trousered(x) and Most(x) -> Aggravate(x, catrina))\nAggravate(leann, gipsy) -> Patristic(leann)\nforall x (Croak(x, catrina) and Croak(x, gipsy) -> Patristic(x))\nforall x (Lossy(x) -> Vulgarise(x, jaquith))\n\nCroak(gipsy, leann)\n\nCroak(gipsy, leann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The paulina suckle the angelo. The nevins is loyal. The ainsley is corruptive. The angelo is corruptive. If someone divagate the paulina then the paulina is corruptive. If someone suckle the nevins and they are unipolar then they need the angelo. If someone is unbloody and unipolar then they need the nevins. If the angelo horsewhip the ainsley then the angelo is loyal. If someone suckle the nevins and they chase the ainsley then they are loyal. If someone is corruptive then they see the paulina. The nevins is not corruptive.", "logic": "\nSuckle(paulina, angelo)\nLoyal(nevins)\nCorruptive(ainsley)\nCorruptive(angelo)\nforall x (Divagate(x, paulina) -> Corruptive(paulina))\nforall x (Suckle(x, nevins) and Unipolar(x) -> Horsewhip(x, angelo))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Unipolar(x) -> Horsewhip(x, nevins))\nHorsewhip(angelo, ainsley) -> Loyal(angelo)\nforall x (Suckle(x, nevins) and Suckle(x, ainsley) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Divagate(x, paulina))\n\nnot Corruptive(nevins)\n\nnot Corruptive(nevins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The evangelin chirrup the niven. The fitz is camp. The kaspar is lone. The niven is lone. If someone wank the evangelin then the evangelin is lone. If someone chirrup the fitz and they are uttered then they need the niven. If someone is meet and uttered then they need the fitz. If the niven confess the kaspar then the niven is camp. If someone chirrup the fitz and they chase the kaspar then they are camp. If someone is lone then they see the evangelin. The evangelin wank the niven.", "logic": "\nChirrup(evangelin, niven)\nCamp(fitz)\nLone(kaspar)\nLone(niven)\nforall x (Wank(x, evangelin) -> Lone(evangelin))\nforall x (Chirrup(x, fitz) and Uttered(x) -> Confess(x, niven))\nforall x (Meet(x) and Uttered(x) -> Confess(x, fitz))\nConfess(niven, kaspar) -> Camp(niven)\nforall x (Chirrup(x, fitz) and Chirrup(x, kaspar) -> Camp(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Wank(x, evangelin))\n\nWank(evangelin, niven)\n\nWank(evangelin, niven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "Iris is lithe. Abraham is wayward. Adelina is jungian. If something is musing and acetylic then it is lithe. If something is severe then it is lithe. Kind things are acetylic. Kind things are jungian. Green, lithe things are jungian. If Adelina is jungian then Adelina is not lithe. If Adelina is wayward and Adelina is not cellulosid then Adelina is jungian. Cold things are severe. Iris is lithe.", "logic": "\nLithe(iris)\nWayward(abraham)\nJungian(adelina)\nforall x (Musing(x) and Acetylic(x) -> Lithe(x))\nforall x (Severe(x) -> Lithe(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) -> Acetylic(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Severe(x) and Lithe(x) -> Jungian(x))\nJungian(adelina) -> not Lithe(adelina)\nWayward(adelina) and not Cellulosid(adelina) -> Jungian(adelina)\nforall x (Wayward(x) -> Severe(x))\n\nLithe(iris)\n\ntherefore Lithe(iris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Jordy is syncopated. Carrissa is pulpy. Prince is sublingual. If something is princely and mutilated then it is syncopated. If something is meaningful then it is syncopated. Kind things are mutilated. Kind things are sublingual. Green, syncopated things are sublingual. If Prince is sublingual then Prince is not syncopated. If Prince is pulpy and Prince is not sunbaked then Prince is sublingual. Cold things are meaningful. Carrissa is not pulpy.", "logic": "\nSyncopated(jordy)\nPulpy(carrissa)\nSublingual(prince)\nforall x (Princely(x) and Mutilated(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nforall x (Meaningful(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Mutilated(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Sublingual(x))\nforall x (Meaningful(x) and Syncopated(x) -> Sublingual(x))\nSublingual(prince) -> not Syncopated(prince)\nPulpy(prince) and not Sunbaked(prince) -> Sublingual(prince)\nforall x (Pulpy(x) -> Meaningful(x))\n\nnot Pulpy(carrissa)\n\ntherefore Pulpy(carrissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Alisa is burned. Gussy is christian. Prasad is tyrannical. If something is ferny and altaic then it is burned. If something is pumped then it is burned. Kind things are altaic. Kind things are tyrannical. Green, burned things are tyrannical. If Prasad is tyrannical then Prasad is not burned. If Prasad is christian and Prasad is not unclad then Prasad is tyrannical. Cold things are pumped. Prasad is not burned.", "logic": "\nBurned(alisa)\nChristian(gussy)\nTyrannical(prasad)\nforall x (Ferny(x) and Altaic(x) -> Burned(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> Burned(x))\nforall x (Burned(x) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Burned(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) and Burned(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\nTyrannical(prasad) -> not Burned(prasad)\nChristian(prasad) and not Unclad(prasad) -> Tyrannical(prasad)\nforall x (Christian(x) -> Pumped(x))\n\nnot Burned(prasad)\n\nTyrannical(prasad) and Tyrannical(prasad) -> not Burned(prasad) -> therefore not Burned(prasad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Cecelia is choky. Danyette is conceited. Aviva is vertical. If something is blushing and slippery then it is choky. If something is sociable then it is choky. Kind things are slippery. Kind things are vertical. Green, choky things are vertical. If Aviva is vertical then Aviva is not choky. If Aviva is conceited and Aviva is not hominine then Aviva is vertical. Cold things are sociable. Danyette is not sociable.", "logic": "\nChoky(cecelia)\nConceited(danyette)\nVertical(aviva)\nforall x (Blushing(x) and Slippery(x) -> Choky(x))\nforall x (Sociable(x) -> Choky(x))\nforall x (Choky(x) -> Slippery(x))\nforall x (Choky(x) -> Vertical(x))\nforall x (Sociable(x) and Choky(x) -> Vertical(x))\nVertical(aviva) -> not Choky(aviva)\nConceited(aviva) and not Hominine(aviva) -> Vertical(aviva)\nforall x (Conceited(x) -> Sociable(x))\n\nnot Sociable(danyette)\n\nConceited(danyette) and forall x (Conceited(x) -> Sociable(x)) -> therefore Sociable(danyette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Skell is basinal. Annabela is amateur. Towney is beardless. If something is unresolved and wary then it is basinal. If something is irrelevant then it is basinal. Kind things are wary. Kind things are beardless. Green, basinal things are beardless. If Towney is beardless then Towney is not basinal. If Towney is amateur and Towney is not twoscore then Towney is beardless. Cold things are irrelevant. Annabela is basinal.", "logic": "\nBasinal(skell)\nAmateur(annabela)\nBeardless(towney)\nforall x (Unresolved(x) and Wary(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Wary(x))\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Beardless(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) and Basinal(x) -> Beardless(x))\nBeardless(towney) -> not Basinal(towney)\nAmateur(towney) and not Twoscore(towney) -> Beardless(towney)\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\n\nBasinal(annabela)\n\nAmateur(annabela) and forall x (Amateur(x) -> Irrelevant(x)) -> therefore Irrelevant(annabela) Irrelevant(annabela) and forall x (Irrelevant(x) -> Basinal(x)) -> therefore Basinal(annabela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Yehudi is scalelike. Max is nonechoic. Kimmie is ceremonial. If something is oleaceous and bruising then it is scalelike. If something is antiblack then it is scalelike. Kind things are bruising. Kind things are ceremonial. Green, scalelike things are ceremonial. If Kimmie is ceremonial then Kimmie is not scalelike. If Kimmie is nonechoic and Kimmie is not mighty then Kimmie is ceremonial. Cold things are antiblack. Max is not scalelike.", "logic": "\nScalelike(yehudi)\nNonechoic(max)\nCeremonial(kimmie)\nforall x (Oleaceous(x) and Bruising(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Bruising(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nCeremonial(kimmie) -> not Scalelike(kimmie)\nNonechoic(kimmie) and not Mighty(kimmie) -> Ceremonial(kimmie)\nforall x (Nonechoic(x) -> Antiblack(x))\n\nnot Scalelike(max)\n\nNonechoic(max) and forall x (Nonechoic(x) -> Antiblack(x)) -> therefore Antiblack(max) Antiblack(max) and forall x (Antiblack(x) -> Scalelike(x)) -> therefore Scalelike(max)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "James is deboned. Wilie is cadastral. Nadia is swayback. If something is definable and etiolated then it is deboned. If something is insensible then it is deboned. Kind things are etiolated. Kind things are swayback. Green, deboned things are swayback. If Nadia is swayback then Nadia is not deboned. If Nadia is cadastral and Nadia is not unskillful then Nadia is swayback. Cold things are insensible. Wilie is etiolated.", "logic": "\nDeboned(james)\nCadastral(wilie)\nSwayback(nadia)\nforall x (Definable(x) and Etiolated(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Insensible(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Etiolated(x))\nforall x (Deboned(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Insensible(x) and Deboned(x) -> Swayback(x))\nSwayback(nadia) -> not Deboned(nadia)\nCadastral(nadia) and not Unskillful(nadia) -> Swayback(nadia)\nforall x (Cadastral(x) -> Insensible(x))\n\nEtiolated(wilie)\n\nCadastral(wilie) and forall x (Cadastral(x) -> Insensible(x)) -> therefore Insensible(wilie) Insensible(wilie) and forall x (Insensible(x) -> Deboned(x)) -> therefore Deboned(wilie) Deboned(wilie) and forall x (Deboned(x) -> Etiolated(x)) -> therefore Etiolated(wilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Kellina is specified. Jerald is alimental. Florette is screwy. If something is calcareous and paved then it is specified. If something is pastoral then it is specified. Kind things are paved. Kind things are screwy. Green, specified things are screwy. If Florette is screwy then Florette is not specified. If Florette is alimental and Florette is not dreaded then Florette is screwy. Cold things are pastoral. Jerald is not screwy.", "logic": "\nSpecified(kellina)\nAlimental(jerald)\nScrewy(florette)\nforall x (Calcareous(x) and Paved(x) -> Specified(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) -> Specified(x))\nforall x (Specified(x) -> Paved(x))\nforall x (Specified(x) -> Screwy(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) and Specified(x) -> Screwy(x))\nScrewy(florette) -> not Specified(florette)\nAlimental(florette) and not Dreaded(florette) -> Screwy(florette)\nforall x (Alimental(x) -> Pastoral(x))\n\nnot Screwy(jerald)\n\nAlimental(jerald) and forall x (Alimental(x) -> Pastoral(x)) -> therefore Pastoral(jerald) Pastoral(jerald) and forall x (Pastoral(x) -> Specified(x)) -> therefore Specified(jerald) Specified(jerald) and forall x (Specified(x) -> Screwy(x)) -> therefore Screwy(jerald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Meggy is impolitic. Guillaume is unsought. Deborah is canadian. If something is priceless and bimotored then it is impolitic. If something is salmon then it is impolitic. Kind things are bimotored. Kind things are canadian. Green, impolitic things are canadian. If Deborah is canadian then Deborah is not impolitic. If Deborah is unsought and Deborah is not gangrenous then Deborah is canadian. Cold things are salmon. Deborah is not bimotored.", "logic": "\nImpolitic(meggy)\nUnsought(guillaume)\nCanadian(deborah)\nforall x (Priceless(x) and Bimotored(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nforall x (Salmon(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nforall x (Impolitic(x) -> Bimotored(x))\nforall x (Impolitic(x) -> Canadian(x))\nforall x (Salmon(x) and Impolitic(x) -> Canadian(x))\nCanadian(deborah) -> not Impolitic(deborah)\nUnsought(deborah) and not Gangrenous(deborah) -> Canadian(deborah)\nforall x (Unsought(x) -> Salmon(x))\n\nnot Bimotored(deborah)\n\nforall x (Impolitic(x) -> Bimotored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Goddart is grasslike. Chen is maiden. Emeline is obvious. If something is interfaith and passive then it is grasslike. If something is autogamous then it is grasslike. Kind things are passive. Kind things are obvious. Green, grasslike things are obvious. If Emeline is obvious then Emeline is not grasslike. If Emeline is maiden and Emeline is not folding then Emeline is obvious. Cold things are autogamous. Goddart is autogamous.", "logic": "\nGrasslike(goddart)\nMaiden(chen)\nObvious(emeline)\nforall x (Interfaith(x) and Passive(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Autogamous(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Passive(x))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Autogamous(x) and Grasslike(x) -> Obvious(x))\nObvious(emeline) -> not Grasslike(emeline)\nMaiden(emeline) and not Folding(emeline) -> Obvious(emeline)\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> Autogamous(x))\n\nAutogamous(goddart)\n\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> Autogamous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Giuseppe is frontmost. Stacy is impossible. Leighton is coagulate. If something is tactile and level then it is frontmost. If something is unpillared then it is frontmost. Kind things are level. Kind things are coagulate. Green, frontmost things are coagulate. If Leighton is coagulate then Leighton is not frontmost. If Leighton is impossible and Leighton is not eclectic then Leighton is coagulate. Cold things are unpillared. Leighton is not unpillared.", "logic": "\nFrontmost(giuseppe)\nImpossible(stacy)\nCoagulate(leighton)\nforall x (Tactile(x) and Level(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Unpillared(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) -> Level(x))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) -> Coagulate(x))\nforall x (Unpillared(x) and Frontmost(x) -> Coagulate(x))\nCoagulate(leighton) -> not Frontmost(leighton)\nImpossible(leighton) and not Eclectic(leighton) -> Coagulate(leighton)\nforall x (Impossible(x) -> Unpillared(x))\n\nnot Unpillared(leighton)\n\nforall x (Impossible(x) -> Unpillared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Aldric is accustomed. Rog is unhealed. Sharlene is rectal. If something is undetected and punctured then it is accustomed. If something is jacobean then it is accustomed. Kind things are punctured. Kind things are rectal. Green, accustomed things are rectal. If Sharlene is rectal then Sharlene is not accustomed. If Sharlene is unhealed and Sharlene is not sneering then Sharlene is rectal. Cold things are jacobean. Sharlene is sneering.", "logic": "\nAccustomed(aldric)\nUnhealed(rog)\nRectal(sharlene)\nforall x (Undetected(x) and Punctured(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Rectal(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) and Accustomed(x) -> Rectal(x))\nRectal(sharlene) -> not Accustomed(sharlene)\nUnhealed(sharlene) and not Sneering(sharlene) -> Rectal(sharlene)\nforall x (Unhealed(x) -> Jacobean(x))\n\nSneering(sharlene)\n\nSneering(sharlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Marie is malcontent. Arabelle is coming. Heinrich is disguised. If something is bitty and fastigiate then it is malcontent. If something is austral then it is malcontent. Kind things are fastigiate. Kind things are disguised. Green, malcontent things are disguised. If Heinrich is disguised then Heinrich is not malcontent. If Heinrich is coming and Heinrich is not algal then Heinrich is disguised. Cold things are austral. Marie is not coming.", "logic": "\nMalcontent(marie)\nComing(arabelle)\nDisguised(heinrich)\nforall x (Bitty(x) and Fastigiate(x) -> Malcontent(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Malcontent(x))\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Fastigiate(x))\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) and Malcontent(x) -> Disguised(x))\nDisguised(heinrich) -> not Malcontent(heinrich)\nComing(heinrich) and not Algal(heinrich) -> Disguised(heinrich)\nforall x (Coming(x) -> Austral(x))\n\nnot Coming(marie)\n\nnot Coming(marie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Maudie is infected. Lyndon is intramural. Kylen is structured. If something is furled and chemical then it is infected. If something is inculpable then it is infected. Kind things are chemical. Kind things are structured. Green, infected things are structured. If Kylen is structured then Kylen is not infected. If Kylen is intramural and Kylen is not caulescent then Kylen is structured. Cold things are inculpable. Maudie is furled.", "logic": "\nInfected(maudie)\nIntramural(lyndon)\nStructured(kylen)\nforall x (Furled(x) and Chemical(x) -> Infected(x))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> Infected(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Chemical(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Structured(x))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) and Infected(x) -> Structured(x))\nStructured(kylen) -> not Infected(kylen)\nIntramural(kylen) and not Caulescent(kylen) -> Structured(kylen)\nforall x (Intramural(x) -> Inculpable(x))\n\nFurled(maudie)\n\nFurled(maudie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Ferguson is backed. Dylan is unexplored. Yolane is silvery. If something is lame and undynamic then it is backed. If something is gritty then it is backed. Kind things are undynamic. Kind things are silvery. Green, backed things are silvery. If Yolane is silvery then Yolane is not backed. If Yolane is unexplored and Yolane is not floating then Yolane is silvery. Cold things are gritty. Ferguson is not floating.", "logic": "\nBacked(ferguson)\nUnexplored(dylan)\nSilvery(yolane)\nforall x (Lame(x) and Undynamic(x) -> Backed(x))\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Backed(x))\nforall x (Backed(x) -> Undynamic(x))\nforall x (Backed(x) -> Silvery(x))\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Backed(x) -> Silvery(x))\nSilvery(yolane) -> not Backed(yolane)\nUnexplored(yolane) and not Floating(yolane) -> Silvery(yolane)\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Gritty(x))\n\nnot Floating(ferguson)\n\nnot Floating(ferguson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Ashley is prodigal. Patrice is worried. Carina is pert. If something is tiptop and platyrhine then it is prodigal. If something is sleeping then it is prodigal. Kind things are platyrhine. Kind things are pert. Green, prodigal things are pert. If Carina is pert then Carina is not prodigal. If Carina is worried and Carina is not uneatable then Carina is pert. Cold things are sleeping. Carina is tiptop.", "logic": "\nProdigal(ashley)\nWorried(patrice)\nPert(carina)\nforall x (Tiptop(x) and Platyrhine(x) -> Prodigal(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) -> Prodigal(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Platyrhine(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Pert(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) and Prodigal(x) -> Pert(x))\nPert(carina) -> not Prodigal(carina)\nWorried(carina) and not Uneatable(carina) -> Pert(carina)\nforall x (Worried(x) -> Sleeping(x))\n\nTiptop(carina)\n\nTiptop(carina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "The gay moralise the gerrie. The gay moralise the abigail. The gay is federal. The gay boil the abigail. The gay broil the gerrie. The juli is federal. The juli boil the gay. The juli boil the abigail. The gerrie moralise the abigail. The gerrie boil the juli. The gerrie broil the juli. The abigail moralise the juli. The abigail moralise the gerrie. The abigail is federal. The abigail is clogging. The abigail boil the gay. If someone broil the gerrie and the gerrie is nonrigid then the gerrie boil the juli. If someone boil the gerrie then they are axile. All axile people are federal. If someone is incorrect and they eat the abigail then they need the gay. If someone boil the gerrie and they are incorrect then they visit the juli. If someone broil the juli then they need the gerrie. The juli is federal.", "logic": "\nMoralise(gay, gerrie)\nMoralise(gay, abigail)\nFederal(gay)\nBoil(gay, abigail)\nBroil(gay, gerrie)\nFederal(juli)\nBoil(juli, gay)\nBoil(juli, abigail)\nMoralise(gerrie, abigail)\nBoil(gerrie, juli)\nBroil(gerrie, juli)\nMoralise(abigail, juli)\nMoralise(abigail, gerrie)\nFederal(abigail)\nClogging(abigail)\nBoil(abigail, gay)\nforall x (Broil(x, gerrie) and Nonrigid(gerrie) -> Boil(gerrie, juli))\nforall x (Boil(x, gerrie) -> Axile(x))\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Federal(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and Moralise(x, abigail) -> Boil(x, gay))\nforall x (Boil(x, gerrie) and Incorrect(x) -> Broil(x, juli))\nforall x (Broil(x, juli) -> Boil(x, gerrie))\n\nFederal(juli)\n\ntherefore Federal(juli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The mufi appraise the mina. The mufi appraise the eliza. The mufi is oviparous. The mufi color the eliza. The mufi callus the mina. The janel is oviparous. The janel color the mufi. The janel color the eliza. The mina appraise the eliza. The mina color the janel. The mina callus the janel. The eliza appraise the janel. The eliza appraise the mina. The eliza is oviparous. The eliza is mundane. The eliza color the mufi. If someone callus the mina and the mina is clerical then the mina color the janel. If someone color the mina then they are blebby. All blebby people are oviparous. If someone is ectodermic and they eat the eliza then they need the mufi. If someone color the mina and they are ectodermic then they visit the janel. If someone callus the janel then they need the mina. The eliza is not mundane.", "logic": "\nAppraise(mufi, mina)\nAppraise(mufi, eliza)\nOviparous(mufi)\nColor(mufi, eliza)\nCallus(mufi, mina)\nOviparous(janel)\nColor(janel, mufi)\nColor(janel, eliza)\nAppraise(mina, eliza)\nColor(mina, janel)\nCallus(mina, janel)\nAppraise(eliza, janel)\nAppraise(eliza, mina)\nOviparous(eliza)\nMundane(eliza)\nColor(eliza, mufi)\nforall x (Callus(x, mina) and Clerical(mina) -> Color(mina, janel))\nforall x (Color(x, mina) -> Blebby(x))\nforall x (Blebby(x) -> Oviparous(x))\nforall x (Ectodermic(x) and Appraise(x, eliza) -> Color(x, mufi))\nforall x (Color(x, mina) and Ectodermic(x) -> Callus(x, janel))\nforall x (Callus(x, janel) -> Color(x, mina))\n\nnot Mundane(eliza)\n\ntherefore Mundane(eliza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The netti scatter the vena. The netti scatter the brynna. The netti is opaque. The netti detoxify the brynna. The netti discuss the vena. The edin is opaque. The edin detoxify the netti. The edin detoxify the brynna. The vena scatter the brynna. The vena detoxify the edin. The vena discuss the edin. The brynna scatter the edin. The brynna scatter the vena. The brynna is opaque. The brynna is temptable. The brynna detoxify the netti. If someone discuss the vena and the vena is coetaneous then the vena detoxify the edin. If someone detoxify the vena then they are botched. All botched people are opaque. If someone is unwavering and they eat the brynna then they need the netti. If someone detoxify the vena and they are unwavering then they visit the edin. If someone discuss the edin then they need the vena. The vena detoxify the vena.", "logic": "\nScatter(netti, vena)\nScatter(netti, brynna)\nOpaque(netti)\nDetoxify(netti, brynna)\nDiscuss(netti, vena)\nOpaque(edin)\nDetoxify(edin, netti)\nDetoxify(edin, brynna)\nScatter(vena, brynna)\nDetoxify(vena, edin)\nDiscuss(vena, edin)\nScatter(brynna, edin)\nScatter(brynna, vena)\nOpaque(brynna)\nTemptable(brynna)\nDetoxify(brynna, netti)\nforall x (Discuss(x, vena) and Coetaneous(vena) -> Detoxify(vena, edin))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, vena) -> Botched(x))\nforall x (Botched(x) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) and Scatter(x, brynna) -> Detoxify(x, netti))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, vena) and Unwavering(x) -> Discuss(x, edin))\nforall x (Discuss(x, edin) -> Detoxify(x, vena))\n\nDetoxify(vena, vena)\n\nDiscuss(vena, edin) and forall x (Discuss(x, edin) -> Detoxify(x, vena)) -> therefore Detoxify(vena, vena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The shannan relive the zena. The shannan relive the annabell. The shannan is ghanaian. The shannan barbarize the annabell. The shannan assemble the zena. The menard is ghanaian. The menard barbarize the shannan. The menard barbarize the annabell. The zena relive the annabell. The zena barbarize the menard. The zena assemble the menard. The annabell relive the menard. The annabell relive the zena. The annabell is ghanaian. The annabell is ineffable. The annabell barbarize the shannan. If someone assemble the zena and the zena is credible then the zena barbarize the menard. If someone barbarize the zena then they are stopped. All stopped people are ghanaian. If someone is realised and they eat the annabell then they need the shannan. If someone barbarize the zena and they are realised then they visit the menard. If someone assemble the menard then they need the zena. The zena does not need the zena.", "logic": "\nRelive(shannan, zena)\nRelive(shannan, annabell)\nGhanaian(shannan)\nBarbarize(shannan, annabell)\nAssemble(shannan, zena)\nGhanaian(menard)\nBarbarize(menard, shannan)\nBarbarize(menard, annabell)\nRelive(zena, annabell)\nBarbarize(zena, menard)\nAssemble(zena, menard)\nRelive(annabell, menard)\nRelive(annabell, zena)\nGhanaian(annabell)\nIneffable(annabell)\nBarbarize(annabell, shannan)\nforall x (Assemble(x, zena) and Credible(zena) -> Barbarize(zena, menard))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, zena) -> Stopped(x))\nforall x (Stopped(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Realised(x) and Relive(x, annabell) -> Barbarize(x, shannan))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, zena) and Realised(x) -> Assemble(x, menard))\nforall x (Assemble(x, menard) -> Barbarize(x, zena))\n\nnot Barbarize(zena, zena)\n\nAssemble(zena, menard) and forall x (Assemble(x, menard) -> Barbarize(x, zena)) -> therefore Barbarize(zena, zena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The cyrillus convoy the mei. The cyrillus convoy the alyson. The cyrillus is lateral. The cyrillus parch the alyson. The cyrillus best the mei. The carroll is lateral. The carroll parch the cyrillus. The carroll parch the alyson. The mei convoy the alyson. The mei parch the carroll. The mei best the carroll. The alyson convoy the carroll. The alyson convoy the mei. The alyson is lateral. The alyson is didactical. The alyson parch the cyrillus. If someone best the mei and the mei is furtive then the mei parch the carroll. If someone parch the mei then they are harmful. All harmful people are lateral. If someone is brawny and they eat the alyson then they need the cyrillus. If someone parch the mei and they are brawny then they visit the carroll. If someone best the carroll then they need the mei. The mei is harmful.", "logic": "\nConvoy(cyrillus, mei)\nConvoy(cyrillus, alyson)\nLateral(cyrillus)\nParch(cyrillus, alyson)\nBest(cyrillus, mei)\nLateral(carroll)\nParch(carroll, cyrillus)\nParch(carroll, alyson)\nConvoy(mei, alyson)\nParch(mei, carroll)\nBest(mei, carroll)\nConvoy(alyson, carroll)\nConvoy(alyson, mei)\nLateral(alyson)\nDidactical(alyson)\nParch(alyson, cyrillus)\nforall x (Best(x, mei) and Furtive(mei) -> Parch(mei, carroll))\nforall x (Parch(x, mei) -> Harmful(x))\nforall x (Harmful(x) -> Lateral(x))\nforall x (Brawny(x) and Convoy(x, alyson) -> Parch(x, cyrillus))\nforall x (Parch(x, mei) and Brawny(x) -> Best(x, carroll))\nforall x (Best(x, carroll) -> Parch(x, mei))\n\nHarmful(mei)\n\nBest(mei, carroll) and forall x (Best(x, carroll) -> Parch(x, mei)) -> therefore Parch(mei, mei) Parch(mei, mei) and forall x (Parch(x, mei) -> Harmful(x)) -> therefore Harmful(mei)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The opaline snicker the ernie. The opaline snicker the larina. The opaline is mussy. The opaline love the larina. The opaline claxon the ernie. The raf is mussy. The raf love the opaline. The raf love the larina. The ernie snicker the larina. The ernie love the raf. The ernie claxon the raf. The larina snicker the raf. The larina snicker the ernie. The larina is mussy. The larina is shamanist. The larina love the opaline. If someone claxon the ernie and the ernie is bursiform then the ernie love the raf. If someone love the ernie then they are anapestic. All anapestic people are mussy. If someone is mismated and they eat the larina then they need the opaline. If someone love the ernie and they are mismated then they visit the raf. If someone claxon the raf then they need the ernie. The ernie is not anapestic.", "logic": "\nSnicker(opaline, ernie)\nSnicker(opaline, larina)\nMussy(opaline)\nLove(opaline, larina)\nClaxon(opaline, ernie)\nMussy(raf)\nLove(raf, opaline)\nLove(raf, larina)\nSnicker(ernie, larina)\nLove(ernie, raf)\nClaxon(ernie, raf)\nSnicker(larina, raf)\nSnicker(larina, ernie)\nMussy(larina)\nShamanist(larina)\nLove(larina, opaline)\nforall x (Claxon(x, ernie) and Bursiform(ernie) -> Love(ernie, raf))\nforall x (Love(x, ernie) -> Anapestic(x))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) -> Mussy(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) and Snicker(x, larina) -> Love(x, opaline))\nforall x (Love(x, ernie) and Mismated(x) -> Claxon(x, raf))\nforall x (Claxon(x, raf) -> Love(x, ernie))\n\nnot Anapestic(ernie)\n\nClaxon(ernie, raf) and forall x (Claxon(x, raf) -> Love(x, ernie)) -> therefore Love(ernie, ernie) Love(ernie, ernie) and forall x (Love(x, ernie) -> Anapestic(x)) -> therefore Anapestic(ernie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The maressa aviate the thaddus. The maressa aviate the garfinkel. The maressa is ranking. The maressa nibble the garfinkel. The maressa asterisk the thaddus. The christina is ranking. The christina nibble the maressa. The christina nibble the garfinkel. The thaddus aviate the garfinkel. The thaddus nibble the christina. The thaddus asterisk the christina. The garfinkel aviate the christina. The garfinkel aviate the thaddus. The garfinkel is ranking. The garfinkel is mohammedan. The garfinkel nibble the maressa. If someone asterisk the thaddus and the thaddus is moot then the thaddus nibble the christina. If someone nibble the thaddus then they are tined. All tined people are ranking. If someone is bulging and they eat the garfinkel then they need the maressa. If someone nibble the thaddus and they are bulging then they visit the christina. If someone asterisk the christina then they need the thaddus. The thaddus is ranking.", "logic": "\nAviate(maressa, thaddus)\nAviate(maressa, garfinkel)\nRanking(maressa)\nNibble(maressa, garfinkel)\nAsterisk(maressa, thaddus)\nRanking(christina)\nNibble(christina, maressa)\nNibble(christina, garfinkel)\nAviate(thaddus, garfinkel)\nNibble(thaddus, christina)\nAsterisk(thaddus, christina)\nAviate(garfinkel, christina)\nAviate(garfinkel, thaddus)\nRanking(garfinkel)\nMohammedan(garfinkel)\nNibble(garfinkel, maressa)\nforall x (Asterisk(x, thaddus) and Moot(thaddus) -> Nibble(thaddus, christina))\nforall x (Nibble(x, thaddus) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Ranking(x))\nforall x (Bulging(x) and Aviate(x, garfinkel) -> Nibble(x, maressa))\nforall x (Nibble(x, thaddus) and Bulging(x) -> Asterisk(x, christina))\nforall x (Asterisk(x, christina) -> Nibble(x, thaddus))\n\nRanking(thaddus)\n\nAsterisk(thaddus, christina) and forall x (Asterisk(x, christina) -> Nibble(x, thaddus)) -> therefore Nibble(thaddus, thaddus) Nibble(thaddus, thaddus) and forall x (Nibble(x, thaddus) -> Tined(x)) -> therefore Tined(thaddus) Tined(thaddus) and forall x (Tined(x) -> Ranking(x)) -> therefore Ranking(thaddus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The tabb unfurl the kyle. The tabb unfurl the brittany. The tabb is stabile. The tabb adjudge the brittany. The tabb kidnap the kyle. The elizabeth is stabile. The elizabeth adjudge the tabb. The elizabeth adjudge the brittany. The kyle unfurl the brittany. The kyle adjudge the elizabeth. The kyle kidnap the elizabeth. The brittany unfurl the elizabeth. The brittany unfurl the kyle. The brittany is stabile. The brittany is submarine. The brittany adjudge the tabb. If someone kidnap the kyle and the kyle is sobersided then the kyle adjudge the elizabeth. If someone adjudge the kyle then they are polygynous. All polygynous people are stabile. If someone is stroppy and they eat the brittany then they need the tabb. If someone adjudge the kyle and they are stroppy then they visit the elizabeth. If someone kidnap the elizabeth then they need the kyle. The kyle is not stabile.", "logic": "\nUnfurl(tabb, kyle)\nUnfurl(tabb, brittany)\nStabile(tabb)\nAdjudge(tabb, brittany)\nKidnap(tabb, kyle)\nStabile(elizabeth)\nAdjudge(elizabeth, tabb)\nAdjudge(elizabeth, brittany)\nUnfurl(kyle, brittany)\nAdjudge(kyle, elizabeth)\nKidnap(kyle, elizabeth)\nUnfurl(brittany, elizabeth)\nUnfurl(brittany, kyle)\nStabile(brittany)\nSubmarine(brittany)\nAdjudge(brittany, tabb)\nforall x (Kidnap(x, kyle) and Sobersided(kyle) -> Adjudge(kyle, elizabeth))\nforall x (Adjudge(x, kyle) -> Polygynous(x))\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> Stabile(x))\nforall x (Stroppy(x) and Unfurl(x, brittany) -> Adjudge(x, tabb))\nforall x (Adjudge(x, kyle) and Stroppy(x) -> Kidnap(x, elizabeth))\nforall x (Kidnap(x, elizabeth) -> Adjudge(x, kyle))\n\nnot Stabile(kyle)\n\nKidnap(kyle, elizabeth) and forall x (Kidnap(x, elizabeth) -> Adjudge(x, kyle)) -> therefore Adjudge(kyle, kyle) Adjudge(kyle, kyle) and forall x (Adjudge(x, kyle) -> Polygynous(x)) -> therefore Polygynous(kyle) Polygynous(kyle) and forall x (Polygynous(x) -> Stabile(x)) -> therefore Stabile(kyle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The bubba lurch the tuesday. The bubba lurch the bennet. The bubba is wheeled. The bubba galumph the bennet. The bubba busy the tuesday. The marnia is wheeled. The marnia galumph the bubba. The marnia galumph the bennet. The tuesday lurch the bennet. The tuesday galumph the marnia. The tuesday busy the marnia. The bennet lurch the marnia. The bennet lurch the tuesday. The bennet is wheeled. The bennet is correct. The bennet galumph the bubba. If someone busy the tuesday and the tuesday is untapped then the tuesday galumph the marnia. If someone galumph the tuesday then they are awnless. All awnless people are wheeled. If someone is malleable and they eat the bennet then they need the bubba. If someone galumph the tuesday and they are malleable then they visit the marnia. If someone busy the marnia then they need the tuesday. The bubba does not visit the marnia.", "logic": "\nLurch(bubba, tuesday)\nLurch(bubba, bennet)\nWheeled(bubba)\nGalumph(bubba, bennet)\nBusy(bubba, tuesday)\nWheeled(marnia)\nGalumph(marnia, bubba)\nGalumph(marnia, bennet)\nLurch(tuesday, bennet)\nGalumph(tuesday, marnia)\nBusy(tuesday, marnia)\nLurch(bennet, marnia)\nLurch(bennet, tuesday)\nWheeled(bennet)\nCorrect(bennet)\nGalumph(bennet, bubba)\nforall x (Busy(x, tuesday) and Untapped(tuesday) -> Galumph(tuesday, marnia))\nforall x (Galumph(x, tuesday) -> Awnless(x))\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) and Lurch(x, bennet) -> Galumph(x, bubba))\nforall x (Galumph(x, tuesday) and Malleable(x) -> Busy(x, marnia))\nforall x (Busy(x, marnia) -> Galumph(x, tuesday))\n\nnot Busy(bubba, marnia)\n\nforall x (Galumph(x, tuesday) and Malleable(x) -> Busy(x, marnia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The leeann reload the brynn. The leeann reload the apostolos. The leeann is undomestic. The leeann cere the apostolos. The leeann asphalt the brynn. The kendall is undomestic. The kendall cere the leeann. The kendall cere the apostolos. The brynn reload the apostolos. The brynn cere the kendall. The brynn asphalt the kendall. The apostolos reload the kendall. The apostolos reload the brynn. The apostolos is undomestic. The apostolos is briery. The apostolos cere the leeann. If someone asphalt the brynn and the brynn is cusped then the brynn cere the kendall. If someone cere the brynn then they are plastered. All plastered people are undomestic. If someone is fewer and they eat the apostolos then they need the leeann. If someone cere the brynn and they are fewer then they visit the kendall. If someone asphalt the kendall then they need the brynn. The leeann cere the brynn.", "logic": "\nReload(leeann, brynn)\nReload(leeann, apostolos)\nUndomestic(leeann)\nCere(leeann, apostolos)\nAsphalt(leeann, brynn)\nUndomestic(kendall)\nCere(kendall, leeann)\nCere(kendall, apostolos)\nReload(brynn, apostolos)\nCere(brynn, kendall)\nAsphalt(brynn, kendall)\nReload(apostolos, kendall)\nReload(apostolos, brynn)\nUndomestic(apostolos)\nBriery(apostolos)\nCere(apostolos, leeann)\nforall x (Asphalt(x, brynn) and Cusped(brynn) -> Cere(brynn, kendall))\nforall x (Cere(x, brynn) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Plastered(x) -> Undomestic(x))\nforall x (Fewer(x) and Reload(x, apostolos) -> Cere(x, leeann))\nforall x (Cere(x, brynn) and Fewer(x) -> Asphalt(x, kendall))\nforall x (Asphalt(x, kendall) -> Cere(x, brynn))\n\nCere(leeann, brynn)\n\nforall x (Asphalt(x, kendall) -> Cere(x, brynn)) <- forall x (Cere(x, brynn) and Fewer(x) -> Asphalt(x, kendall)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The lorilee inveigle the broddy. The lorilee inveigle the louie. The lorilee is flush. The lorilee mousse the louie. The lorilee chord the broddy. The arthur is flush. The arthur mousse the lorilee. The arthur mousse the louie. The broddy inveigle the louie. The broddy mousse the arthur. The broddy chord the arthur. The louie inveigle the arthur. The louie inveigle the broddy. The louie is flush. The louie is empiric. The louie mousse the lorilee. If someone chord the broddy and the broddy is arsenical then the broddy mousse the arthur. If someone mousse the broddy then they are ardent. All ardent people are flush. If someone is urethral and they eat the louie then they need the lorilee. If someone mousse the broddy and they are urethral then they visit the arthur. If someone chord the arthur then they need the broddy. The arthur does not need the broddy.", "logic": "\nInveigle(lorilee, broddy)\nInveigle(lorilee, louie)\nFlush(lorilee)\nMousse(lorilee, louie)\nChord(lorilee, broddy)\nFlush(arthur)\nMousse(arthur, lorilee)\nMousse(arthur, louie)\nInveigle(broddy, louie)\nMousse(broddy, arthur)\nChord(broddy, arthur)\nInveigle(louie, arthur)\nInveigle(louie, broddy)\nFlush(louie)\nEmpiric(louie)\nMousse(louie, lorilee)\nforall x (Chord(x, broddy) and Arsenical(broddy) -> Mousse(broddy, arthur))\nforall x (Mousse(x, broddy) -> Ardent(x))\nforall x (Ardent(x) -> Flush(x))\nforall x (Urethral(x) and Inveigle(x, louie) -> Mousse(x, lorilee))\nforall x (Mousse(x, broddy) and Urethral(x) -> Chord(x, arthur))\nforall x (Chord(x, arthur) -> Mousse(x, broddy))\n\nnot Mousse(arthur, broddy)\n\nforall x (Chord(x, arthur) -> Mousse(x, broddy)) <- forall x (Mousse(x, broddy) and Urethral(x) -> Chord(x, arthur)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The emmaline scratch the susanna. The emmaline scratch the ilana. The emmaline is liii. The emmaline binge the ilana. The emmaline postpose the susanna. The haley is liii. The haley binge the emmaline. The haley binge the ilana. The susanna scratch the ilana. The susanna binge the haley. The susanna postpose the haley. The ilana scratch the haley. The ilana scratch the susanna. The ilana is liii. The ilana is inst. The ilana binge the emmaline. If someone postpose the susanna and the susanna is unstarred then the susanna binge the haley. If someone binge the susanna then they are rustproof. All rustproof people are liii. If someone is enlivening and they eat the ilana then they need the emmaline. If someone binge the susanna and they are enlivening then they visit the haley. If someone postpose the haley then they need the susanna. The haley postpose the haley.", "logic": "\nScratch(emmaline, susanna)\nScratch(emmaline, ilana)\nLiii(emmaline)\nBinge(emmaline, ilana)\nPostpose(emmaline, susanna)\nLiii(haley)\nBinge(haley, emmaline)\nBinge(haley, ilana)\nScratch(susanna, ilana)\nBinge(susanna, haley)\nPostpose(susanna, haley)\nScratch(ilana, haley)\nScratch(ilana, susanna)\nLiii(ilana)\nInst(ilana)\nBinge(ilana, emmaline)\nforall x (Postpose(x, susanna) and Unstarred(susanna) -> Binge(susanna, haley))\nforall x (Binge(x, susanna) -> Rustproof(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Liii(x))\nforall x (Enlivening(x) and Scratch(x, ilana) -> Binge(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Binge(x, susanna) and Enlivening(x) -> Postpose(x, haley))\nforall x (Postpose(x, haley) -> Binge(x, susanna))\n\nPostpose(haley, haley)\n\nforall x (Binge(x, susanna) and Enlivening(x) -> Postpose(x, haley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The gabbi discern the catie. The gabbi discern the shauna. The gabbi is syllabic. The gabbi denote the shauna. The gabbi telescope the catie. The huntlee is syllabic. The huntlee denote the gabbi. The huntlee denote the shauna. The catie discern the shauna. The catie denote the huntlee. The catie telescope the huntlee. The shauna discern the huntlee. The shauna discern the catie. The shauna is syllabic. The shauna is croupy. The shauna denote the gabbi. If someone telescope the catie and the catie is hispanic then the catie denote the huntlee. If someone denote the catie then they are expiatory. All expiatory people are syllabic. If someone is maddened and they eat the shauna then they need the gabbi. If someone denote the catie and they are maddened then they visit the huntlee. If someone telescope the huntlee then they need the catie. The catie does not visit the catie.", "logic": "\nDiscern(gabbi, catie)\nDiscern(gabbi, shauna)\nSyllabic(gabbi)\nDenote(gabbi, shauna)\nTelescope(gabbi, catie)\nSyllabic(huntlee)\nDenote(huntlee, gabbi)\nDenote(huntlee, shauna)\nDiscern(catie, shauna)\nDenote(catie, huntlee)\nTelescope(catie, huntlee)\nDiscern(shauna, huntlee)\nDiscern(shauna, catie)\nSyllabic(shauna)\nCroupy(shauna)\nDenote(shauna, gabbi)\nforall x (Telescope(x, catie) and Hispanic(catie) -> Denote(catie, huntlee))\nforall x (Denote(x, catie) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) -> Syllabic(x))\nforall x (Maddened(x) and Discern(x, shauna) -> Denote(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Denote(x, catie) and Maddened(x) -> Telescope(x, huntlee))\nforall x (Telescope(x, huntlee) -> Denote(x, catie))\n\nnot Telescope(catie, catie)\n\nnot Telescope(catie, catie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The sherrie libel the cookie. The sherrie libel the kim. The sherrie is overweight. The sherrie pursue the kim. The sherrie meet the cookie. The ailina is overweight. The ailina pursue the sherrie. The ailina pursue the kim. The cookie libel the kim. The cookie pursue the ailina. The cookie meet the ailina. The kim libel the ailina. The kim libel the cookie. The kim is overweight. The kim is amatory. The kim pursue the sherrie. If someone meet the cookie and the cookie is irenic then the cookie pursue the ailina. If someone pursue the cookie then they are nimble. All nimble people are overweight. If someone is noncausal and they eat the kim then they need the sherrie. If someone pursue the cookie and they are noncausal then they visit the ailina. If someone meet the ailina then they need the cookie. The kim pursue the ailina.", "logic": "\nLibel(sherrie, cookie)\nLibel(sherrie, kim)\nOverweight(sherrie)\nPursue(sherrie, kim)\nMeet(sherrie, cookie)\nOverweight(ailina)\nPursue(ailina, sherrie)\nPursue(ailina, kim)\nLibel(cookie, kim)\nPursue(cookie, ailina)\nMeet(cookie, ailina)\nLibel(kim, ailina)\nLibel(kim, cookie)\nOverweight(kim)\nAmatory(kim)\nPursue(kim, sherrie)\nforall x (Meet(x, cookie) and Irenic(cookie) -> Pursue(cookie, ailina))\nforall x (Pursue(x, cookie) -> Nimble(x))\nforall x (Nimble(x) -> Overweight(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) and Libel(x, kim) -> Pursue(x, sherrie))\nforall x (Pursue(x, cookie) and Noncausal(x) -> Meet(x, ailina))\nforall x (Meet(x, ailina) -> Pursue(x, cookie))\n\nPursue(kim, ailina)\n\nPursue(kim, ailina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The elwin imprecate the bogart. The elwin imprecate the nola. The elwin is cherished. The elwin perish the nola. The elwin infer the bogart. The rodd is cherished. The rodd perish the elwin. The rodd perish the nola. The bogart imprecate the nola. The bogart perish the rodd. The bogart infer the rodd. The nola imprecate the rodd. The nola imprecate the bogart. The nola is cherished. The nola is biogenetic. The nola perish the elwin. If someone infer the bogart and the bogart is hypnoid then the bogart perish the rodd. If someone perish the bogart then they are desultory. All desultory people are cherished. If someone is located and they eat the nola then they need the elwin. If someone perish the bogart and they are located then they visit the rodd. If someone infer the rodd then they need the bogart. The rodd does not eat the elwin.", "logic": "\nImprecate(elwin, bogart)\nImprecate(elwin, nola)\nCherished(elwin)\nPerish(elwin, nola)\nInfer(elwin, bogart)\nCherished(rodd)\nPerish(rodd, elwin)\nPerish(rodd, nola)\nImprecate(bogart, nola)\nPerish(bogart, rodd)\nInfer(bogart, rodd)\nImprecate(nola, rodd)\nImprecate(nola, bogart)\nCherished(nola)\nBiogenetic(nola)\nPerish(nola, elwin)\nforall x (Infer(x, bogart) and Hypnoid(bogart) -> Perish(bogart, rodd))\nforall x (Perish(x, bogart) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Desultory(x) -> Cherished(x))\nforall x (Located(x) and Imprecate(x, nola) -> Perish(x, elwin))\nforall x (Perish(x, bogart) and Located(x) -> Infer(x, rodd))\nforall x (Infer(x, rodd) -> Perish(x, bogart))\n\nnot Imprecate(rodd, elwin)\n\nnot Imprecate(rodd, elwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The doralyn tire the joanna. The doralyn tire the gerard. The doralyn is shapely. The doralyn legitimise the gerard. The doralyn illumine the joanna. The ricki is shapely. The ricki legitimise the doralyn. The ricki legitimise the gerard. The joanna tire the gerard. The joanna legitimise the ricki. The joanna illumine the ricki. The gerard tire the ricki. The gerard tire the joanna. The gerard is shapely. The gerard is hardcore. The gerard legitimise the doralyn. If someone illumine the joanna and the joanna is downlike then the joanna legitimise the ricki. If someone legitimise the joanna then they are venomed. All venomed people are shapely. If someone is theist and they eat the gerard then they need the doralyn. If someone legitimise the joanna and they are theist then they visit the ricki. If someone illumine the ricki then they need the joanna. The doralyn tire the doralyn.", "logic": "\nTire(doralyn, joanna)\nTire(doralyn, gerard)\nShapely(doralyn)\nLegitimise(doralyn, gerard)\nIllumine(doralyn, joanna)\nShapely(ricki)\nLegitimise(ricki, doralyn)\nLegitimise(ricki, gerard)\nTire(joanna, gerard)\nLegitimise(joanna, ricki)\nIllumine(joanna, ricki)\nTire(gerard, ricki)\nTire(gerard, joanna)\nShapely(gerard)\nHardcore(gerard)\nLegitimise(gerard, doralyn)\nforall x (Illumine(x, joanna) and Downlike(joanna) -> Legitimise(joanna, ricki))\nforall x (Legitimise(x, joanna) -> Venomed(x))\nforall x (Venomed(x) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Theist(x) and Tire(x, gerard) -> Legitimise(x, doralyn))\nforall x (Legitimise(x, joanna) and Theist(x) -> Illumine(x, ricki))\nforall x (Illumine(x, ricki) -> Legitimise(x, joanna))\n\nTire(doralyn, doralyn)\n\nTire(doralyn, doralyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The darla is tyrolese. If someone is tyrolese then they are uncheerful. Nice people are not uncheerful. If the darla is uncheerful then the darla is unaccepted. Nice, uncheerful people are tyrolese. If the darla is appositive then the darla is uncheerful. If someone is atoxic and not tyrolese then they are unaccepted. Nice, tyrolese people are unaccepted. All unaccepted, uncheerful people are atoxic. The darla is tyrolese.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(darla)\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\nforall x (Appositive(x) -> not Uncheerful(x))\nUncheerful(darla) -> Unaccepted(darla)\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Uncheerful(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\nAppositive(darla) -> Uncheerful(darla)\nforall x (Atoxic(x) and not Tyrolese(x) -> Unaccepted(x))\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Tyrolese(x) -> Unaccepted(x))\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) and Uncheerful(x) -> Atoxic(x))\n\nTyrolese(darla)\n\ntherefore Tyrolese(darla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The loise is rivalrous. If someone is rivalrous then they are chanted. Nice people are not chanted. If the loise is chanted then the loise is designate. Nice, chanted people are rivalrous. If the loise is unblinking then the loise is chanted. If someone is dosed and not rivalrous then they are designate. Nice, rivalrous people are designate. All designate, chanted people are dosed. The loise is not rivalrous.", "logic": "\nRivalrous(loise)\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Chanted(x))\nforall x (Unblinking(x) -> not Chanted(x))\nChanted(loise) -> Designate(loise)\nforall x (Unblinking(x) and Chanted(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nUnblinking(loise) -> Chanted(loise)\nforall x (Dosed(x) and not Rivalrous(x) -> Designate(x))\nforall x (Unblinking(x) and Rivalrous(x) -> Designate(x))\nforall x (Designate(x) and Chanted(x) -> Dosed(x))\n\nnot Rivalrous(loise)\n\ntherefore Rivalrous(loise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The fawna is bibulous. If someone is bibulous then they are unfastened. Nice people are not unfastened. If the fawna is unfastened then the fawna is heliacal. Nice, unfastened people are bibulous. If the fawna is moated then the fawna is unfastened. If someone is payable and not bibulous then they are heliacal. Nice, bibulous people are heliacal. All heliacal, unfastened people are payable. The fawna is unfastened.", "logic": "\nBibulous(fawna)\nforall x (Bibulous(x) -> Unfastened(x))\nforall x (Moated(x) -> not Unfastened(x))\nUnfastened(fawna) -> Heliacal(fawna)\nforall x (Moated(x) and Unfastened(x) -> Bibulous(x))\nMoated(fawna) -> Unfastened(fawna)\nforall x (Payable(x) and not Bibulous(x) -> Heliacal(x))\nforall x (Moated(x) and Bibulous(x) -> Heliacal(x))\nforall x (Heliacal(x) and Unfastened(x) -> Payable(x))\n\nUnfastened(fawna)\n\nBibulous(fawna) and forall x (Bibulous(x) -> Unfastened(x)) -> therefore Unfastened(fawna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The josefina is scaly. If someone is scaly then they are outraged. Nice people are not outraged. If the josefina is outraged then the josefina is roan. Nice, outraged people are scaly. If the josefina is seriocomic then the josefina is outraged. If someone is unwilling and not scaly then they are roan. Nice, scaly people are roan. All roan, outraged people are unwilling. The josefina is not outraged.", "logic": "\nScaly(josefina)\nforall x (Scaly(x) -> Outraged(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) -> not Outraged(x))\nOutraged(josefina) -> Roan(josefina)\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) and Outraged(x) -> Scaly(x))\nSeriocomic(josefina) -> Outraged(josefina)\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and not Scaly(x) -> Roan(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) and Scaly(x) -> Roan(x))\nforall x (Roan(x) and Outraged(x) -> Unwilling(x))\n\nnot Outraged(josefina)\n\nScaly(josefina) and forall x (Scaly(x) -> Outraged(x)) -> therefore Outraged(josefina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The theodore is columnar. If someone is columnar then they are ashen. Nice people are not ashen. If the theodore is ashen then the theodore is indebted. Nice, ashen people are columnar. If the theodore is tamil then the theodore is ashen. If someone is engaged and not columnar then they are indebted. Nice, columnar people are indebted. All indebted, ashen people are engaged. The theodore is indebted.", "logic": "\nColumnar(theodore)\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Tamil(x) -> not Ashen(x))\nAshen(theodore) -> Indebted(theodore)\nforall x (Tamil(x) and Ashen(x) -> Columnar(x))\nTamil(theodore) -> Ashen(theodore)\nforall x (Engaged(x) and not Columnar(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Tamil(x) and Columnar(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Ashen(x) -> Engaged(x))\n\nIndebted(theodore)\n\nColumnar(theodore) and forall x (Columnar(x) -> Ashen(x)) -> therefore Ashen(theodore) Ashen(theodore) and Ashen(theodore) -> Indebted(theodore) -> therefore Indebted(theodore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The analiese is umteenth. If someone is umteenth then they are pestered. Nice people are not pestered. If the analiese is pestered then the analiese is reticulate. Nice, pestered people are umteenth. If the analiese is gardant then the analiese is pestered. If someone is pencilled and not umteenth then they are reticulate. Nice, umteenth people are reticulate. All reticulate, pestered people are pencilled. The analiese is not reticulate.", "logic": "\nUmteenth(analiese)\nforall x (Umteenth(x) -> Pestered(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> not Pestered(x))\nPestered(analiese) -> Reticulate(analiese)\nforall x (Gardant(x) and Pestered(x) -> Umteenth(x))\nGardant(analiese) -> Pestered(analiese)\nforall x (Pencilled(x) and not Umteenth(x) -> Reticulate(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) and Umteenth(x) -> Reticulate(x))\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and Pestered(x) -> Pencilled(x))\n\nnot Reticulate(analiese)\n\nUmteenth(analiese) and forall x (Umteenth(x) -> Pestered(x)) -> therefore Pestered(analiese) Pestered(analiese) and Pestered(analiese) -> Reticulate(analiese) -> therefore Reticulate(analiese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The jennie is lengthened. If someone is lengthened then they are incautious. Nice people are not incautious. If the jennie is incautious then the jennie is stoppered. Nice, incautious people are lengthened. If the jennie is impuissant then the jennie is incautious. If someone is euphonous and not lengthened then they are stoppered. Nice, lengthened people are stoppered. All stoppered, incautious people are euphonous. The jennie is euphonous.", "logic": "\nLengthened(jennie)\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Incautious(x))\nforall x (Impuissant(x) -> not Incautious(x))\nIncautious(jennie) -> Stoppered(jennie)\nforall x (Impuissant(x) and Incautious(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nImpuissant(jennie) -> Incautious(jennie)\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and not Lengthened(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Impuissant(x) and Lengthened(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Stoppered(x) and Incautious(x) -> Euphonous(x))\n\nEuphonous(jennie)\n\nLengthened(jennie) and forall x (Lengthened(x) -> Incautious(x)) -> therefore Incautious(jennie) Incautious(jennie) and Incautious(jennie) -> Stoppered(jennie) -> therefore Stoppered(jennie) Lengthened(jennie) and forall x (Lengthened(x) -> Incautious(x)) -> therefore Incautious(jennie) Stoppered(jennie) and Incautious(jennie) and forall x (Stoppered(x) and Incautious(x) -> Euphonous(x)) -> therefore Euphonous(jennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The stacia is reasonless. If someone is reasonless then they are effulgent. Nice people are not effulgent. If the stacia is effulgent then the stacia is bitter. Nice, effulgent people are reasonless. If the stacia is sumptuous then the stacia is effulgent. If someone is upstanding and not reasonless then they are bitter. Nice, reasonless people are bitter. All bitter, effulgent people are upstanding. The stacia is not upstanding.", "logic": "\nReasonless(stacia)\nforall x (Reasonless(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> not Effulgent(x))\nEffulgent(stacia) -> Bitter(stacia)\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) and Effulgent(x) -> Reasonless(x))\nSumptuous(stacia) -> Effulgent(stacia)\nforall x (Upstanding(x) and not Reasonless(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) and Reasonless(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) and Effulgent(x) -> Upstanding(x))\n\nnot Upstanding(stacia)\n\nReasonless(stacia) and forall x (Reasonless(x) -> Effulgent(x)) -> therefore Effulgent(stacia) Effulgent(stacia) and Effulgent(stacia) -> Bitter(stacia) -> therefore Bitter(stacia) Reasonless(stacia) and forall x (Reasonless(x) -> Effulgent(x)) -> therefore Effulgent(stacia) Bitter(stacia) and Effulgent(stacia) and forall x (Bitter(x) and Effulgent(x) -> Upstanding(x)) -> therefore Upstanding(stacia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The clarissa is pinioned. If someone is pinioned then they are infrequent. Nice people are not infrequent. If the clarissa is infrequent then the clarissa is crinkled. Nice, infrequent people are pinioned. If the clarissa is bicameral then the clarissa is infrequent. If someone is franciscan and not pinioned then they are crinkled. Nice, pinioned people are crinkled. All crinkled, infrequent people are franciscan. The clarissa does not visit the clarissa.", "logic": "\nPinioned(clarissa)\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Infrequent(x))\nforall x (Bicameral(x) -> not Infrequent(x))\nInfrequent(clarissa) -> Crinkled(clarissa)\nforall x (Bicameral(x) and Infrequent(x) -> Pinioned(x))\nBicameral(clarissa) -> Infrequent(clarissa)\nforall x (Franciscan(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Bicameral(x) and Pinioned(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Crinkled(x) and Infrequent(x) -> Franciscan(x))\n\nnot Visits(clarissa, clarissa)\n\nnot Visits(clarissa, clarissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The andriana is directing. If someone is directing then they are stodgy. Nice people are not stodgy. If the andriana is stodgy then the andriana is nominated. Nice, stodgy people are directing. If the andriana is unpleasing then the andriana is stodgy. If someone is quotidian and not directing then they are nominated. Nice, directing people are nominated. All nominated, stodgy people are quotidian. The andriana needs the andriana.", "logic": "\nDirecting(andriana)\nforall x (Directing(x) -> Stodgy(x))\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> not Stodgy(x))\nStodgy(andriana) -> Nominated(andriana)\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) and Stodgy(x) -> Directing(x))\nUnpleasing(andriana) -> Stodgy(andriana)\nforall x (Quotidian(x) and not Directing(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) and Directing(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and Stodgy(x) -> Quotidian(x))\n\nNeeds(andriana, andriana)\n\nNeeds(andriana, andriana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The caresa is archaean. If someone is archaean then they are pestered. Nice people are not pestered. If the caresa is pestered then the caresa is blae. Nice, pestered people are archaean. If the caresa is untipped then the caresa is pestered. If someone is amylaceous and not archaean then they are blae. Nice, archaean people are blae. All blae, pestered people are amylaceous. The caresa does not see the caresa.", "logic": "\nArchaean(caresa)\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Pestered(x))\nforall x (Untipped(x) -> not Pestered(x))\nPestered(caresa) -> Blae(caresa)\nforall x (Untipped(x) and Pestered(x) -> Archaean(x))\nUntipped(caresa) -> Pestered(caresa)\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) and not Archaean(x) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Untipped(x) and Archaean(x) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Blae(x) and Pestered(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\n\nnot Sees(caresa, caresa)\n\nnot Sees(caresa, caresa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The sophia is diarrheal. If someone is diarrheal then they are hitless. Nice people are not hitless. If the sophia is hitless then the sophia is rakish. Nice, hitless people are diarrheal. If the sophia is taillike then the sophia is hitless. If someone is cured and not diarrheal then they are rakish. Nice, diarrheal people are rakish. All rakish, hitless people are cured. The sophia is taillike.", "logic": "\nDiarrheal(sophia)\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) -> Hitless(x))\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> not Hitless(x))\nHitless(sophia) -> Rakish(sophia)\nforall x (Taillike(x) and Hitless(x) -> Diarrheal(x))\nTaillike(sophia) -> Hitless(sophia)\nforall x (Cured(x) and not Diarrheal(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Taillike(x) and Diarrheal(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Rakish(x) and Hitless(x) -> Cured(x))\n\nTaillike(sophia)\n\nTaillike(sophia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "Tremayne is spurting. Bonnie is flagrant. Sidney is flagrant. If something is nordic then it is instinct. Rough things are nordic. Cold things are specified. Bonnie is flagrant.", "logic": "\nSpurting(tremayne)\nFlagrant(bonnie)\nFlagrant(sidney)\nforall x (Nordic(x) -> Instinct(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Nordic(x))\nforall x (Instinct(x) -> Specified(x))\n\nFlagrant(bonnie)\n\ntherefore Flagrant(bonnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Pace is slumbrous. Mario is thunderous. Roddie is thunderous. If something is reserved then it is cypriote. Rough things are reserved. Cold things are salaried. Roddie is not thunderous.", "logic": "\nSlumbrous(pace)\nThunderous(mario)\nThunderous(roddie)\nforall x (Reserved(x) -> Cypriote(x))\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) -> Salaried(x))\n\nnot Thunderous(roddie)\n\ntherefore Thunderous(roddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Claudio is leased. Woody is stylised. Liam is stylised. If something is thirtieth then it is sculptural. Rough things are thirtieth. Cold things are tempting. Claudio is thirtieth.", "logic": "\nLeased(claudio)\nStylised(woody)\nStylised(liam)\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Sculptural(x))\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Thirtieth(x))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) -> Tempting(x))\n\nThirtieth(claudio)\n\nLeased(claudio) and forall x (Leased(x) -> Thirtieth(x)) -> therefore Thirtieth(claudio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Marigold is ominous. Kirstin is politic. Brear is politic. If something is darkling then it is august. Rough things are darkling. Cold things are essential. Marigold is not darkling.", "logic": "\nOminous(marigold)\nPolitic(kirstin)\nPolitic(brear)\nforall x (Darkling(x) -> August(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) -> Darkling(x))\nforall x (August(x) -> Essential(x))\n\nnot Darkling(marigold)\n\nOminous(marigold) and forall x (Ominous(x) -> Darkling(x)) -> therefore Darkling(marigold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Trevor is arcuate. Eldon is dermal. Janeva is dermal. If something is asternal then it is unparented. Rough things are asternal. Cold things are liveried. Trevor is unparented.", "logic": "\nArcuate(trevor)\nDermal(eldon)\nDermal(janeva)\nforall x (Asternal(x) -> Unparented(x))\nforall x (Arcuate(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Unparented(x) -> Liveried(x))\n\nUnparented(trevor)\n\nArcuate(trevor) and forall x (Arcuate(x) -> Asternal(x)) -> therefore Asternal(trevor) Asternal(trevor) and forall x (Asternal(x) -> Unparented(x)) -> therefore Unparented(trevor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Langston is homoerotic. Carlyle is tributary. Briteny is tributary. If something is literary then it is upraised. Rough things are literary. Cold things are hypaethral. Langston is not upraised.", "logic": "\nHomoerotic(langston)\nTributary(carlyle)\nTributary(briteny)\nforall x (Literary(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Homoerotic(x) -> Literary(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\n\nnot Upraised(langston)\n\nHomoerotic(langston) and forall x (Homoerotic(x) -> Literary(x)) -> therefore Literary(langston) Literary(langston) and forall x (Literary(x) -> Upraised(x)) -> therefore Upraised(langston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Bernelle is unilateral. Lynnelle is startling. Sapphire is startling. If something is keyless then it is trussed. Rough things are keyless. Cold things are bulgarian. Bernelle is bulgarian.", "logic": "\nUnilateral(bernelle)\nStartling(lynnelle)\nStartling(sapphire)\nforall x (Keyless(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Unilateral(x) -> Keyless(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Bulgarian(x))\n\nBulgarian(bernelle)\n\nUnilateral(bernelle) and forall x (Unilateral(x) -> Keyless(x)) -> therefore Keyless(bernelle) Keyless(bernelle) and forall x (Keyless(x) -> Trussed(x)) -> therefore Trussed(bernelle) Trussed(bernelle) and forall x (Trussed(x) -> Bulgarian(x)) -> therefore Bulgarian(bernelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Dottie is crescent. Barton is connective. Sherye is connective. If something is unstudious then it is euphonical. Rough things are unstudious. Cold things are ratified. Dottie is not ratified.", "logic": "\nCrescent(dottie)\nConnective(barton)\nConnective(sherye)\nforall x (Unstudious(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nforall x (Crescent(x) -> Unstudious(x))\nforall x (Euphonical(x) -> Ratified(x))\n\nnot Ratified(dottie)\n\nCrescent(dottie) and forall x (Crescent(x) -> Unstudious(x)) -> therefore Unstudious(dottie) Unstudious(dottie) and forall x (Unstudious(x) -> Euphonical(x)) -> therefore Euphonical(dottie) Euphonical(dottie) and forall x (Euphonical(x) -> Ratified(x)) -> therefore Ratified(dottie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Patricia is incident. Cristine is sulcate. Paula is sulcate. If something is boisterous then it is sadducean. Rough things are boisterous. Cold things are tattered. Paula is not sadducean.", "logic": "\nIncident(patricia)\nSulcate(cristine)\nSulcate(paula)\nforall x (Boisterous(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Incident(x) -> Boisterous(x))\nforall x (Sadducean(x) -> Tattered(x))\n\nnot Sadducean(paula)\n\nforall x (Boisterous(x) -> Sadducean(x)) <- forall x (Incident(x) -> Boisterous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Orelia is aspectual. Anita is yellowish. Calvin is yellowish. If something is fastened then it is pacific. Rough things are fastened. Cold things are spaced. Calvin is fastened.", "logic": "\nAspectual(orelia)\nYellowish(anita)\nYellowish(calvin)\nforall x (Fastened(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Aspectual(x) -> Fastened(x))\nforall x (Pacific(x) -> Spaced(x))\n\nFastened(calvin)\n\nforall x (Aspectual(x) -> Fastened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Pryce is reigning. Madlen is ursine. Glynda is ursine. If something is greatest then it is ambrosian. Rough things are greatest. Cold things are pubertal. Madlen is not pubertal.", "logic": "\nReigning(pryce)\nUrsine(madlen)\nUrsine(glynda)\nforall x (Greatest(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Reigning(x) -> Greatest(x))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Pubertal(x))\n\nnot Pubertal(madlen)\n\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Pubertal(x)) <- forall x (Greatest(x) -> Ambrosian(x)) <- forall x (Reigning(x) -> Greatest(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Sidnee is revocable. Keriann is gammy. Juergen is gammy. If something is svelte then it is divorced. Rough things are svelte. Cold things are uninviting. Juergen is uninviting.", "logic": "\nRevocable(sidnee)\nGammy(keriann)\nGammy(juergen)\nforall x (Svelte(x) -> Divorced(x))\nforall x (Revocable(x) -> Svelte(x))\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Uninviting(x))\n\nUninviting(juergen)\n\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Uninviting(x)) <- forall x (Svelte(x) -> Divorced(x)) <- forall x (Revocable(x) -> Svelte(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Kelly is sunken. Bancroft is intruding. Cherie is intruding. If something is specific then it is bubbly. Rough things are specific. Cold things are fattish. Cherie is not kind.", "logic": "\nSunken(kelly)\nIntruding(bancroft)\nIntruding(cherie)\nforall x (Specific(x) -> Bubbly(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> Specific(x))\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Fattish(x))\n\nnot Kind(cherie)\n\nnot Kind(cherie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Cosette is astir. Averil is downfield. Mauritz is downfield. If something is moresque then it is coquettish. Rough things are moresque. Cold things are apotropaic. Mauritz is astir.", "logic": "\nAstir(cosette)\nDownfield(averil)\nDownfield(mauritz)\nforall x (Moresque(x) -> Coquettish(x))\nforall x (Astir(x) -> Moresque(x))\nforall x (Coquettish(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\n\nAstir(mauritz)\n\nAstir(mauritz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Tait is hushed. Loleta is irate. Prasun is irate. If something is zigzag then it is ostensible. Rough things are zigzag. Cold things are yellow. Prasun is not big.", "logic": "\nHushed(tait)\nIrate(loleta)\nIrate(prasun)\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Zigzag(x))\nforall x (Ostensible(x) -> Yellow(x))\n\nnot Big(prasun)\n\nnot Big(prasun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Bernard is declarable. Germaine is hatless. Dante is hatless. If something is bohemian then it is adust. Rough things are bohemian. Cold things are genic. Bernard is kind.", "logic": "\nDeclarable(bernard)\nHatless(germaine)\nHatless(dante)\nforall x (Bohemian(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Genic(x))\n\nKind(bernard)\n\nKind(bernard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Oliy is grouchy. White, grouchy things are duplex. If something is slithering then it is patterned. All grouchy things are slithering. Oliy is grouchy.", "logic": "\nGrouchy(oliy)\nforall x (Patterned(x) and Grouchy(x) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Slithering(x) -> Patterned(x))\nforall x (Grouchy(x) -> Slithering(x))\n\nGrouchy(oliy)\n\ntherefore Grouchy(oliy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Virginia is goethian. White, goethian things are trustful. If something is coming then it is verified. All goethian things are coming. Virginia is not goethian.", "logic": "\nGoethian(virginia)\nforall x (Verified(x) and Goethian(x) -> Trustful(x))\nforall x (Coming(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Coming(x))\n\nnot Goethian(virginia)\n\ntherefore Goethian(virginia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Ashish is tensed. White, tensed things are attired. If something is clubbish then it is arrant. All tensed things are clubbish. Ashish is clubbish.", "logic": "\nTensed(ashish)\nforall x (Arrant(x) and Tensed(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Arrant(x))\nforall x (Tensed(x) -> Clubbish(x))\n\nClubbish(ashish)\n\nTensed(ashish) and forall x (Tensed(x) -> Clubbish(x)) -> therefore Clubbish(ashish)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Bard is vile. White, vile things are wayward. If something is haematal then it is loamless. All vile things are haematal. Bard is not haematal.", "logic": "\nVile(bard)\nforall x (Loamless(x) and Vile(x) -> Wayward(x))\nforall x (Haematal(x) -> Loamless(x))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Haematal(x))\n\nnot Haematal(bard)\n\nVile(bard) and forall x (Vile(x) -> Haematal(x)) -> therefore Haematal(bard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Zorina is bimestrial. White, bimestrial things are ferial. If something is difficult then it is nominal. All bimestrial things are difficult. Zorina is nominal.", "logic": "\nBimestrial(zorina)\nforall x (Nominal(x) and Bimestrial(x) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Difficult(x) -> Nominal(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Difficult(x))\n\nNominal(zorina)\n\nBimestrial(zorina) and forall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Difficult(x)) -> therefore Difficult(zorina) Difficult(zorina) and forall x (Difficult(x) -> Nominal(x)) -> therefore Nominal(zorina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Bella is sectarian. White, sectarian things are cagey. If something is imaginable then it is encircling. All sectarian things are imaginable. Bella is not encircling.", "logic": "\nSectarian(bella)\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Sectarian(x) -> Cagey(x))\nforall x (Imaginable(x) -> Encircling(x))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) -> Imaginable(x))\n\nnot Encircling(bella)\n\nSectarian(bella) and forall x (Sectarian(x) -> Imaginable(x)) -> therefore Imaginable(bella) Imaginable(bella) and forall x (Imaginable(x) -> Encircling(x)) -> therefore Encircling(bella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Christan is manual. White, manual things are psychotic. If something is bursiform then it is parametric. All manual things are bursiform. Christan is psychotic.", "logic": "\nManual(christan)\nforall x (Parametric(x) and Manual(x) -> Psychotic(x))\nforall x (Bursiform(x) -> Parametric(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Bursiform(x))\n\nPsychotic(christan)\n\nManual(christan) and forall x (Manual(x) -> Bursiform(x)) -> therefore Bursiform(christan) Bursiform(christan) and forall x (Bursiform(x) -> Parametric(x)) -> therefore Parametric(christan) Parametric(christan) and Manual(christan) and forall x (Parametric(x) and Manual(x) -> Psychotic(x)) -> therefore Psychotic(christan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Daveen is cumbersome. White, cumbersome things are cyprian. If something is nonfat then it is mesonic. All cumbersome things are nonfat. Daveen is not cyprian.", "logic": "\nCumbersome(daveen)\nforall x (Mesonic(x) and Cumbersome(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Nonfat(x) -> Mesonic(x))\nforall x (Cumbersome(x) -> Nonfat(x))\n\nnot Cyprian(daveen)\n\nCumbersome(daveen) and forall x (Cumbersome(x) -> Nonfat(x)) -> therefore Nonfat(daveen) Nonfat(daveen) and forall x (Nonfat(x) -> Mesonic(x)) -> therefore Mesonic(daveen) Mesonic(daveen) and Cumbersome(daveen) and forall x (Mesonic(x) and Cumbersome(x) -> Cyprian(x)) -> therefore Cyprian(daveen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Winthrop is queenly. White, queenly things are most. If something is forceful then it is benthal. All queenly things are forceful. Winthrop is not kind.", "logic": "\nQueenly(winthrop)\nforall x (Benthal(x) and Queenly(x) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Forceful(x) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Queenly(x) -> Forceful(x))\n\nnot Kind(winthrop)\n\nnot Kind(winthrop) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Gabriello is changeful. White, changeful things are cursory. If something is porticoed then it is latinate. All changeful things are porticoed. Gabriello is smart.", "logic": "\nChangeful(gabriello)\nforall x (Latinate(x) and Changeful(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Porticoed(x) -> Latinate(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) -> Porticoed(x))\n\nSmart(gabriello)\n\nSmart(gabriello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Sinclair is offish. Harmony is offish. Fawn is not hatched. If someone is changeful then they are hatched. If someone is excess and not offish then they are not creepy. Rough, glaciated people are not creepy. All changeful, hatched people are excess. If someone is glaciated then they are not excess. If someone is offish then they are changeful. Harmony is offish.", "logic": "\nOffish(sinclair)\nOffish(harmony)\nnot Hatched(fawn)\nforall x (Changeful(x) -> Hatched(x))\nforall x (Excess(x) and not Offish(x) -> not Creepy(x))\nforall x (Westbound(x) and Glaciated(x) -> not Creepy(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) and Hatched(x) -> Excess(x))\nforall x (Glaciated(x) -> not Excess(x))\nforall x (Offish(x) -> Changeful(x))\n\nOffish(harmony)\n\ntherefore Offish(harmony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Astrid is malted. Kelly is malted. Lorrie is not friendless. If someone is jawed then they are friendless. If someone is immobile and not malted then they are not fretful. Rough, anaclitic people are not fretful. All jawed, friendless people are immobile. If someone is anaclitic then they are not immobile. If someone is malted then they are jawed. Lorrie is friendless.", "logic": "\nMalted(astrid)\nMalted(kelly)\nnot Friendless(lorrie)\nforall x (Jawed(x) -> Friendless(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) and not Malted(x) -> not Fretful(x))\nforall x (Burled(x) and Anaclitic(x) -> not Fretful(x))\nforall x (Jawed(x) and Friendless(x) -> Immobile(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) -> not Immobile(x))\nforall x (Malted(x) -> Jawed(x))\n\nFriendless(lorrie)\n\ntherefore not Friendless(lorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Cindi is bordered. Kaspar is bordered. Delinda is not purblind. If someone is breeched then they are purblind. If someone is tangential and not bordered then they are not coarsened. Rough, inheriting people are not coarsened. All breeched, purblind people are tangential. If someone is inheriting then they are not tangential. If someone is bordered then they are breeched. Kaspar is breeched.", "logic": "\nBordered(cindi)\nBordered(kaspar)\nnot Purblind(delinda)\nforall x (Breeched(x) -> Purblind(x))\nforall x (Tangential(x) and not Bordered(x) -> not Coarsened(x))\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) and Inheriting(x) -> not Coarsened(x))\nforall x (Breeched(x) and Purblind(x) -> Tangential(x))\nforall x (Inheriting(x) -> not Tangential(x))\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Breeched(x))\n\nBreeched(kaspar)\n\nBordered(kaspar) and forall x (Bordered(x) -> Breeched(x)) -> therefore Breeched(kaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Pearle is sham. Halette is sham. Nelly is not caulked. If someone is majestic then they are caulked. If someone is couthy and not sham then they are not leal. Rough, homophile people are not leal. All majestic, caulked people are couthy. If someone is homophile then they are not couthy. If someone is sham then they are majestic. Halette is not majestic.", "logic": "\nSham(pearle)\nSham(halette)\nnot Caulked(nelly)\nforall x (Majestic(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Couthy(x) and not Sham(x) -> not Leal(x))\nforall x (Tickling(x) and Homophile(x) -> not Leal(x))\nforall x (Majestic(x) and Caulked(x) -> Couthy(x))\nforall x (Homophile(x) -> not Couthy(x))\nforall x (Sham(x) -> Majestic(x))\n\nnot Majestic(halette)\n\nSham(halette) and forall x (Sham(x) -> Majestic(x)) -> therefore Majestic(halette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Cordula is ungrasped. Elsa is ungrasped. Alexia is not flyspeck. If someone is popeyed then they are flyspeck. If someone is hispid and not ungrasped then they are not labored. Rough, hyperemic people are not labored. All popeyed, flyspeck people are hispid. If someone is hyperemic then they are not hispid. If someone is ungrasped then they are popeyed. Elsa is flyspeck.", "logic": "\nUngrasped(cordula)\nUngrasped(elsa)\nnot Flyspeck(alexia)\nforall x (Popeyed(x) -> Flyspeck(x))\nforall x (Hispid(x) and not Ungrasped(x) -> not Labored(x))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) and Hyperemic(x) -> not Labored(x))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) and Flyspeck(x) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Hyperemic(x) -> not Hispid(x))\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Popeyed(x))\n\nFlyspeck(elsa)\n\nUngrasped(elsa) and forall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Popeyed(x)) -> therefore Popeyed(elsa) Popeyed(elsa) and forall x (Popeyed(x) -> Flyspeck(x)) -> therefore Flyspeck(elsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Malvina is platelike. Danielle is platelike. Bill is not praiseful. If someone is nebulous then they are praiseful. If someone is posterior and not platelike then they are not chalky. Rough, unobliging people are not chalky. All nebulous, praiseful people are posterior. If someone is unobliging then they are not posterior. If someone is platelike then they are nebulous. Malvina is not praiseful.", "logic": "\nPlatelike(malvina)\nPlatelike(danielle)\nnot Praiseful(bill)\nforall x (Nebulous(x) -> Praiseful(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) and not Platelike(x) -> not Chalky(x))\nforall x (Jellylike(x) and Unobliging(x) -> not Chalky(x))\nforall x (Nebulous(x) and Praiseful(x) -> Posterior(x))\nforall x (Unobliging(x) -> not Posterior(x))\nforall x (Platelike(x) -> Nebulous(x))\n\nnot Praiseful(malvina)\n\nPlatelike(malvina) and forall x (Platelike(x) -> Nebulous(x)) -> therefore Nebulous(malvina) Nebulous(malvina) and forall x (Nebulous(x) -> Praiseful(x)) -> therefore Praiseful(malvina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Isa is foxy. Benedict is foxy. Sylvester is not prognathic. If someone is monovalent then they are prognathic. If someone is copasetic and not foxy then they are not lordless. Rough, socialist people are not lordless. All monovalent, prognathic people are copasetic. If someone is socialist then they are not copasetic. If someone is foxy then they are monovalent. Benedict is copasetic.", "logic": "\nFoxy(isa)\nFoxy(benedict)\nnot Prognathic(sylvester)\nforall x (Monovalent(x) -> Prognathic(x))\nforall x (Copasetic(x) and not Foxy(x) -> not Lordless(x))\nforall x (Agelong(x) and Socialist(x) -> not Lordless(x))\nforall x (Monovalent(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Copasetic(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> not Copasetic(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> Monovalent(x))\n\nCopasetic(benedict)\n\nFoxy(benedict) and forall x (Foxy(x) -> Monovalent(x)) -> therefore Monovalent(benedict) Foxy(benedict) and forall x (Foxy(x) -> Monovalent(x)) -> therefore Monovalent(benedict) Monovalent(benedict) and forall x (Monovalent(x) -> Prognathic(x)) -> therefore Prognathic(benedict) Monovalent(benedict) and Prognathic(benedict) and forall x (Monovalent(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Copasetic(x)) -> therefore Copasetic(benedict)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Zebadiah is czech. Rosemary is czech. Ichabod is not undesirous. If someone is bully then they are undesirous. If someone is heartfelt and not czech then they are not intricate. Rough, adjective people are not intricate. All bully, undesirous people are heartfelt. If someone is adjective then they are not heartfelt. If someone is czech then they are bully. Rosemary is not heartfelt.", "logic": "\nCzech(zebadiah)\nCzech(rosemary)\nnot Undesirous(ichabod)\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Undesirous(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) and not Czech(x) -> not Intricate(x))\nforall x (Ambulacral(x) and Adjective(x) -> not Intricate(x))\nforall x (Bully(x) and Undesirous(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Adjective(x) -> not Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Czech(x) -> Bully(x))\n\nnot Heartfelt(rosemary)\n\nCzech(rosemary) and forall x (Czech(x) -> Bully(x)) -> therefore Bully(rosemary) Czech(rosemary) and forall x (Czech(x) -> Bully(x)) -> therefore Bully(rosemary) Bully(rosemary) and forall x (Bully(x) -> Undesirous(x)) -> therefore Undesirous(rosemary) Bully(rosemary) and Undesirous(rosemary) and forall x (Bully(x) and Undesirous(x) -> Heartfelt(x)) -> therefore Heartfelt(rosemary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Floris is particular. Genevra is particular. Michaela is not inverted. If someone is neutered then they are inverted. If someone is haemic and not particular then they are not thwartwise. Rough, untainted people are not thwartwise. All neutered, inverted people are haemic. If someone is untainted then they are not haemic. If someone is particular then they are neutered. Michaela is not haemic.", "logic": "\nParticular(floris)\nParticular(genevra)\nnot Inverted(michaela)\nforall x (Neutered(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Haemic(x) and not Particular(x) -> not Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Grizzled(x) and Untainted(x) -> not Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Neutered(x) and Inverted(x) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Untainted(x) -> not Haemic(x))\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Neutered(x))\n\nnot Haemic(michaela)\n\nforall x (Neutered(x) and Inverted(x) -> Haemic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Joelle is nilotic. Mendie is nilotic. Blake is not purifying. If someone is saxatile then they are purifying. If someone is swell and not nilotic then they are not emended. Rough, unlicensed people are not emended. All saxatile, purifying people are swell. If someone is unlicensed then they are not swell. If someone is nilotic then they are saxatile. Blake is saxatile.", "logic": "\nNilotic(joelle)\nNilotic(mendie)\nnot Purifying(blake)\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Purifying(x))\nforall x (Swell(x) and not Nilotic(x) -> not Emended(x))\nforall x (Mindful(x) and Unlicensed(x) -> not Emended(x))\nforall x (Saxatile(x) and Purifying(x) -> Swell(x))\nforall x (Unlicensed(x) -> not Swell(x))\nforall x (Nilotic(x) -> Saxatile(x))\n\nSaxatile(blake)\n\nforall x (Nilotic(x) -> Saxatile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Caren is nativistic. Lorelle is nativistic. Helge is not antrorse. If someone is unremedied then they are antrorse. If someone is unimagined and not nativistic then they are not mournful. Rough, pathogenic people are not mournful. All unremedied, antrorse people are unimagined. If someone is pathogenic then they are not unimagined. If someone is nativistic then they are unremedied. Helge is not nativistic.", "logic": "\nNativistic(caren)\nNativistic(lorelle)\nnot Antrorse(helge)\nforall x (Unremedied(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nforall x (Unimagined(x) and not Nativistic(x) -> not Mournful(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) and Pathogenic(x) -> not Mournful(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) and Antrorse(x) -> Unimagined(x))\nforall x (Pathogenic(x) -> not Unimagined(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) -> Unremedied(x))\n\nnot Nativistic(helge)\n\nnot Nativistic(helge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Jaynell is material. Arnoldo is material. Ania is not loopy. If someone is dastardly then they are loopy. If someone is brushy and not material then they are not starlike. Rough, rangy people are not starlike. All dastardly, loopy people are brushy. If someone is rangy then they are not brushy. If someone is material then they are dastardly. Jaynell is jeweled.", "logic": "\nMaterial(jaynell)\nMaterial(arnoldo)\nnot Loopy(ania)\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Brushy(x) and not Material(x) -> not Starlike(x))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and Rangy(x) -> not Starlike(x))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) and Loopy(x) -> Brushy(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> not Brushy(x))\nforall x (Material(x) -> Dastardly(x))\n\nJeweled(jaynell)\n\nJeweled(jaynell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Zita is tactual. Aldrich is tactual. Katina is not fluid. If someone is flammable then they are fluid. If someone is plumping and not tactual then they are not acidotic. Rough, gutsy people are not acidotic. All flammable, fluid people are plumping. If someone is gutsy then they are not plumping. If someone is tactual then they are flammable. Aldrich is not chancy.", "logic": "\nTactual(zita)\nTactual(aldrich)\nnot Fluid(katina)\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Fluid(x))\nforall x (Plumping(x) and not Tactual(x) -> not Acidotic(x))\nforall x (Chancy(x) and Gutsy(x) -> not Acidotic(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) and Fluid(x) -> Plumping(x))\nforall x (Gutsy(x) -> not Plumping(x))\nforall x (Tactual(x) -> Flammable(x))\n\nnot Chancy(aldrich)\n\nnot Chancy(aldrich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Madlin is pilotless. Reta is pilotless. Berrie is not enumerable. If someone is cacuminal then they are enumerable. If someone is brusque and not pilotless then they are not latter. Rough, florentine people are not latter. All cacuminal, enumerable people are brusque. If someone is florentine then they are not brusque. If someone is pilotless then they are cacuminal. Berrie is florentine.", "logic": "\nPilotless(madlin)\nPilotless(reta)\nnot Enumerable(berrie)\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Brusque(x) and not Pilotless(x) -> not Latter(x))\nforall x (Glistening(x) and Florentine(x) -> not Latter(x))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Enumerable(x) -> Brusque(x))\nforall x (Florentine(x) -> not Brusque(x))\nforall x (Pilotless(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\n\nFlorentine(berrie)\n\nFlorentine(berrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Gwenore is trojan. Opaline is trojan. Yank is not soapy. If someone is thunderous then they are soapy. If someone is prenatal and not trojan then they are not norwegian. Rough, bronchitic people are not norwegian. All thunderous, soapy people are prenatal. If someone is bronchitic then they are not prenatal. If someone is trojan then they are thunderous. Gwenore is not bronchitic.", "logic": "\nTrojan(gwenore)\nTrojan(opaline)\nnot Soapy(yank)\nforall x (Thunderous(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and not Trojan(x) -> not Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) and Bronchitic(x) -> not Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Thunderous(x) and Soapy(x) -> Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Bronchitic(x) -> not Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Trojan(x) -> Thunderous(x))\n\nnot Bronchitic(gwenore)\n\nnot Bronchitic(gwenore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Jabez is calyptrate. Zorina is calyptrate. Skip is not bloodshot. If someone is lusty then they are bloodshot. If someone is sadistic and not calyptrate then they are not last. Rough, heedless people are not last. All lusty, bloodshot people are sadistic. If someone is heedless then they are not sadistic. If someone is calyptrate then they are lusty. Jabez is last.", "logic": "\nCalyptrate(jabez)\nCalyptrate(zorina)\nnot Bloodshot(skip)\nforall x (Lusty(x) -> Bloodshot(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and not Calyptrate(x) -> not Last(x))\nforall x (Unclad(x) and Heedless(x) -> not Last(x))\nforall x (Lusty(x) and Bloodshot(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Heedless(x) -> not Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) -> Lusty(x))\n\nLast(jabez)\n\nLast(jabez) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "The bevvy is shoeless. The bevvy amortize the aldis. The aldis does not see the lara. The gershon is motherlike. The gershon surtax the lara. The lara is huddled. The lara surtax the gershon. If something amortize the lara then it crack the gershon. If the gershon is motherlike then the gershon does not like the aldis. If the gershon is newsworthy then the gershon does not like the aldis. If something is shoeless then it amortize the lara. If something amortize the bevvy and it is not huddled then it does not like the gershon. If something surtax the lara then it is shoeless. If something amortize the bevvy then the bevvy is not shoeless. If something amortize the gershon and the gershon does not like the aldis then the aldis is motherlike. The lara is huddled.", "logic": "\nShoeless(bevvy)\nAmortize(bevvy, aldis)\nnot Amortize(aldis, lara)\nMotherlike(gershon)\nSurtax(gershon, lara)\nHuddled(lara)\nSurtax(lara, gershon)\nforall x (Amortize(x, lara) -> Crack(x, gershon))\nMotherlike(gershon) -> not Surtax(gershon, aldis)\nNewsworthy(gershon) -> not Surtax(gershon, aldis)\nforall x (Shoeless(x) -> Amortize(x, lara))\nforall x (Amortize(x, bevvy) and not Huddled(x) -> not Surtax(x, gershon))\nforall x (Surtax(x, lara) -> Shoeless(x))\nforall x (Amortize(x, bevvy) -> not Shoeless(bevvy))\nforall x (Amortize(x, gershon) and not Surtax(gershon, aldis) -> Motherlike(aldis))\n\nHuddled(lara)\n\ntherefore Huddled(lara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The alexia is cantabile. The alexia rave the alton. The alton does not see the dimitry. The francois is earthlike. The francois immobilise the dimitry. The dimitry is disposed. The dimitry immobilise the francois. If something rave the dimitry then it dart the francois. If the francois is earthlike then the francois does not like the alton. If the francois is lobular then the francois does not like the alton. If something is cantabile then it rave the dimitry. If something rave the alexia and it is not disposed then it does not like the francois. If something immobilise the dimitry then it is cantabile. If something rave the alexia then the alexia is not cantabile. If something rave the francois and the francois does not like the alton then the alton is earthlike. The francois is not earthlike.", "logic": "\nCantabile(alexia)\nRave(alexia, alton)\nnot Rave(alton, dimitry)\nEarthlike(francois)\nImmobilise(francois, dimitry)\nDisposed(dimitry)\nImmobilise(dimitry, francois)\nforall x (Rave(x, dimitry) -> Dart(x, francois))\nEarthlike(francois) -> not Immobilise(francois, alton)\nLobular(francois) -> not Immobilise(francois, alton)\nforall x (Cantabile(x) -> Rave(x, dimitry))\nforall x (Rave(x, alexia) and not Disposed(x) -> not Immobilise(x, francois))\nforall x (Immobilise(x, dimitry) -> Cantabile(x))\nforall x (Rave(x, alexia) -> not Cantabile(alexia))\nforall x (Rave(x, francois) and not Immobilise(francois, alton) -> Earthlike(alton))\n\nnot Earthlike(francois)\n\ntherefore Earthlike(francois)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The berrie is stout. The berrie withstand the waverley. The waverley does not see the idaline. The darlene is subjugated. The darlene maculate the idaline. The idaline is illusional. The idaline maculate the darlene. If something withstand the idaline then it telefax the darlene. If the darlene is subjugated then the darlene does not like the waverley. If the darlene is discrepant then the darlene does not like the waverley. If something is stout then it withstand the idaline. If something withstand the berrie and it is not illusional then it does not like the darlene. If something maculate the idaline then it is stout. If something withstand the berrie then the berrie is not stout. If something withstand the darlene and the darlene does not like the waverley then the waverley is subjugated. The berrie withstand the idaline.", "logic": "\nStout(berrie)\nWithstand(berrie, waverley)\nnot Withstand(waverley, idaline)\nSubjugated(darlene)\nMaculate(darlene, idaline)\nIllusional(idaline)\nMaculate(idaline, darlene)\nforall x (Withstand(x, idaline) -> Telefax(x, darlene))\nSubjugated(darlene) -> not Maculate(darlene, waverley)\nDiscrepant(darlene) -> not Maculate(darlene, waverley)\nforall x (Stout(x) -> Withstand(x, idaline))\nforall x (Withstand(x, berrie) and not Illusional(x) -> not Maculate(x, darlene))\nforall x (Maculate(x, idaline) -> Stout(x))\nforall x (Withstand(x, berrie) -> not Stout(berrie))\nforall x (Withstand(x, darlene) and not Maculate(darlene, waverley) -> Subjugated(waverley))\n\nWithstand(berrie, idaline)\n\nStout(berrie) and forall x (Stout(x) -> Withstand(x, idaline)) -> therefore Withstand(berrie, idaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The gipsy is pinstriped. The gipsy obtrude the cheslie. The cheslie does not see the adger. The dom is simulated. The dom sugar the adger. The adger is eccentric. The adger sugar the dom. If something obtrude the adger then it gabble the dom. If the dom is simulated then the dom does not like the cheslie. If the dom is undersexed then the dom does not like the cheslie. If something is pinstriped then it obtrude the adger. If something obtrude the gipsy and it is not eccentric then it does not like the dom. If something sugar the adger then it is pinstriped. If something obtrude the gipsy then the gipsy is not pinstriped. If something obtrude the dom and the dom does not like the cheslie then the cheslie is simulated. The gipsy does not see the adger.", "logic": "\nPinstriped(gipsy)\nObtrude(gipsy, cheslie)\nnot Obtrude(cheslie, adger)\nSimulated(dom)\nSugar(dom, adger)\nEccentric(adger)\nSugar(adger, dom)\nforall x (Obtrude(x, adger) -> Gabble(x, dom))\nSimulated(dom) -> not Sugar(dom, cheslie)\nUndersexed(dom) -> not Sugar(dom, cheslie)\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Obtrude(x, adger))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, gipsy) and not Eccentric(x) -> not Sugar(x, dom))\nforall x (Sugar(x, adger) -> Pinstriped(x))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, gipsy) -> not Pinstriped(gipsy))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, dom) and not Sugar(dom, cheslie) -> Simulated(cheslie))\n\nnot Obtrude(gipsy, adger)\n\nPinstriped(gipsy) and forall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Obtrude(x, adger)) -> therefore Obtrude(gipsy, adger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The suzanna is tasty. The suzanna arrest the doe. The doe does not see the bobine. The lucinda is uncarpeted. The lucinda rosin the bobine. The bobine is storied. The bobine rosin the lucinda. If something arrest the bobine then it clip the lucinda. If the lucinda is uncarpeted then the lucinda does not like the doe. If the lucinda is cuddly then the lucinda does not like the doe. If something is tasty then it arrest the bobine. If something arrest the suzanna and it is not storied then it does not like the lucinda. If something rosin the bobine then it is tasty. If something arrest the suzanna then the suzanna is not tasty. If something arrest the lucinda and the lucinda does not like the doe then the doe is uncarpeted. The suzanna clip the lucinda.", "logic": "\nTasty(suzanna)\nArrest(suzanna, doe)\nnot Arrest(doe, bobine)\nUncarpeted(lucinda)\nRosin(lucinda, bobine)\nStoried(bobine)\nRosin(bobine, lucinda)\nforall x (Arrest(x, bobine) -> Clip(x, lucinda))\nUncarpeted(lucinda) -> not Rosin(lucinda, doe)\nCuddly(lucinda) -> not Rosin(lucinda, doe)\nforall x (Tasty(x) -> Arrest(x, bobine))\nforall x (Arrest(x, suzanna) and not Storied(x) -> not Rosin(x, lucinda))\nforall x (Rosin(x, bobine) -> Tasty(x))\nforall x (Arrest(x, suzanna) -> not Tasty(suzanna))\nforall x (Arrest(x, lucinda) and not Rosin(lucinda, doe) -> Uncarpeted(doe))\n\nClip(suzanna, lucinda)\n\nTasty(suzanna) and forall x (Tasty(x) -> Arrest(x, bobine)) -> therefore Arrest(suzanna, bobine) Arrest(suzanna, bobine) and forall x (Arrest(x, bobine) -> Clip(x, lucinda)) -> therefore Clip(suzanna, lucinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The emilia is outlawed. The emilia normalize the scotty. The scotty does not see the eugine. The silas is boronic. The silas presage the eugine. The eugine is julian. The eugine presage the silas. If something normalize the eugine then it backlog the silas. If the silas is boronic then the silas does not like the scotty. If the silas is chambered then the silas does not like the scotty. If something is outlawed then it normalize the eugine. If something normalize the emilia and it is not julian then it does not like the silas. If something presage the eugine then it is outlawed. If something normalize the emilia then the emilia is not outlawed. If something normalize the silas and the silas does not like the scotty then the scotty is boronic. The emilia does not visit the silas.", "logic": "\nOutlawed(emilia)\nNormalize(emilia, scotty)\nnot Normalize(scotty, eugine)\nBoronic(silas)\nPresage(silas, eugine)\nJulian(eugine)\nPresage(eugine, silas)\nforall x (Normalize(x, eugine) -> Backlog(x, silas))\nBoronic(silas) -> not Presage(silas, scotty)\nChambered(silas) -> not Presage(silas, scotty)\nforall x (Outlawed(x) -> Normalize(x, eugine))\nforall x (Normalize(x, emilia) and not Julian(x) -> not Presage(x, silas))\nforall x (Presage(x, eugine) -> Outlawed(x))\nforall x (Normalize(x, emilia) -> not Outlawed(emilia))\nforall x (Normalize(x, silas) and not Presage(silas, scotty) -> Boronic(scotty))\n\nnot Backlog(emilia, silas)\n\nOutlawed(emilia) and forall x (Outlawed(x) -> Normalize(x, eugine)) -> therefore Normalize(emilia, eugine) Normalize(emilia, eugine) and forall x (Normalize(x, eugine) -> Backlog(x, silas)) -> therefore Backlog(emilia, silas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The hew is privileged. The hew integrate the lizette. The lizette does not see the alpa. The dieter is doctorial. The dieter misspell the alpa. The alpa is quechuan. The alpa misspell the dieter. If something integrate the alpa then it eyewitness the dieter. If the dieter is doctorial then the dieter does not like the lizette. If the dieter is barebacked then the dieter does not like the lizette. If something is privileged then it integrate the alpa. If something integrate the hew and it is not quechuan then it does not like the dieter. If something misspell the alpa then it is privileged. If something integrate the hew then the hew is not privileged. If something integrate the dieter and the dieter does not like the lizette then the lizette is doctorial. The dieter eyewitness the dieter.", "logic": "\nPrivileged(hew)\nIntegrate(hew, lizette)\nnot Integrate(lizette, alpa)\nDoctorial(dieter)\nMisspell(dieter, alpa)\nQuechuan(alpa)\nMisspell(alpa, dieter)\nforall x (Integrate(x, alpa) -> Eyewitness(x, dieter))\nDoctorial(dieter) -> not Misspell(dieter, lizette)\nBarebacked(dieter) -> not Misspell(dieter, lizette)\nforall x (Privileged(x) -> Integrate(x, alpa))\nforall x (Integrate(x, hew) and not Quechuan(x) -> not Misspell(x, dieter))\nforall x (Misspell(x, alpa) -> Privileged(x))\nforall x (Integrate(x, hew) -> not Privileged(hew))\nforall x (Integrate(x, dieter) and not Misspell(dieter, lizette) -> Doctorial(lizette))\n\nEyewitness(dieter, dieter)\n\nMisspell(dieter, alpa) and forall x (Misspell(x, alpa) -> Privileged(x)) -> therefore Privileged(dieter) Privileged(dieter) and forall x (Privileged(x) -> Integrate(x, alpa)) -> therefore Integrate(dieter, alpa) Integrate(dieter, alpa) and forall x (Integrate(x, alpa) -> Eyewitness(x, dieter)) -> therefore Eyewitness(dieter, dieter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The michael is adulatory. The michael foster the sayers. The sayers does not see the frederico. The tiffani is jocose. The tiffani infiltrate the frederico. The frederico is coiled. The frederico infiltrate the tiffani. If something foster the frederico then it rumple the tiffani. If the tiffani is jocose then the tiffani does not like the sayers. If the tiffani is zenithal then the tiffani does not like the sayers. If something is adulatory then it foster the frederico. If something foster the michael and it is not coiled then it does not like the tiffani. If something infiltrate the frederico then it is adulatory. If something foster the michael then the michael is not adulatory. If something foster the tiffani and the tiffani does not like the sayers then the sayers is jocose. The tiffani does not visit the tiffani.", "logic": "\nAdulatory(michael)\nFoster(michael, sayers)\nnot Foster(sayers, frederico)\nJocose(tiffani)\nInfiltrate(tiffani, frederico)\nCoiled(frederico)\nInfiltrate(frederico, tiffani)\nforall x (Foster(x, frederico) -> Rumple(x, tiffani))\nJocose(tiffani) -> not Infiltrate(tiffani, sayers)\nZenithal(tiffani) -> not Infiltrate(tiffani, sayers)\nforall x (Adulatory(x) -> Foster(x, frederico))\nforall x (Foster(x, michael) and not Coiled(x) -> not Infiltrate(x, tiffani))\nforall x (Infiltrate(x, frederico) -> Adulatory(x))\nforall x (Foster(x, michael) -> not Adulatory(michael))\nforall x (Foster(x, tiffani) and not Infiltrate(tiffani, sayers) -> Jocose(sayers))\n\nnot Rumple(tiffani, tiffani)\n\nInfiltrate(tiffani, frederico) and forall x (Infiltrate(x, frederico) -> Adulatory(x)) -> therefore Adulatory(tiffani) Adulatory(tiffani) and forall x (Adulatory(x) -> Foster(x, frederico)) -> therefore Foster(tiffani, frederico) Foster(tiffani, frederico) and forall x (Foster(x, frederico) -> Rumple(x, tiffani)) -> therefore Rumple(tiffani, tiffani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The tamiko is courageous. The tamiko incase the gerhardt. The gerhardt does not see the helmuth. The ragnhild is stupendous. The ragnhild thieve the helmuth. The helmuth is sotho. The helmuth thieve the ragnhild. If something incase the helmuth then it flush the ragnhild. If the ragnhild is stupendous then the ragnhild does not like the gerhardt. If the ragnhild is calloused then the ragnhild does not like the gerhardt. If something is courageous then it incase the helmuth. If something incase the tamiko and it is not sotho then it does not like the ragnhild. If something thieve the helmuth then it is courageous. If something incase the tamiko then the tamiko is not courageous. If something incase the ragnhild and the ragnhild does not like the gerhardt then the gerhardt is stupendous. The helmuth does not visit the ragnhild.", "logic": "\nCourageous(tamiko)\nIncase(tamiko, gerhardt)\nnot Incase(gerhardt, helmuth)\nStupendous(ragnhild)\nThieve(ragnhild, helmuth)\nSotho(helmuth)\nThieve(helmuth, ragnhild)\nforall x (Incase(x, helmuth) -> Flush(x, ragnhild))\nStupendous(ragnhild) -> not Thieve(ragnhild, gerhardt)\nCalloused(ragnhild) -> not Thieve(ragnhild, gerhardt)\nforall x (Courageous(x) -> Incase(x, helmuth))\nforall x (Incase(x, tamiko) and not Sotho(x) -> not Thieve(x, ragnhild))\nforall x (Thieve(x, helmuth) -> Courageous(x))\nforall x (Incase(x, tamiko) -> not Courageous(tamiko))\nforall x (Incase(x, ragnhild) and not Thieve(ragnhild, gerhardt) -> Stupendous(gerhardt))\n\nnot Flush(helmuth, ragnhild)\n\nforall x (Incase(x, helmuth) -> Flush(x, ragnhild)) <- forall x (Courageous(x) -> Incase(x, helmuth)) <- forall x (Thieve(x, helmuth) -> Courageous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The fleurette is unstarred. The fleurette guzzle the roderich. The roderich does not see the joly. The izzi is tabby. The izzi misuse the joly. The joly is rapacious. The joly misuse the izzi. If something guzzle the joly then it bituminise the izzi. If the izzi is tabby then the izzi does not like the roderich. If the izzi is sweetheart then the izzi does not like the roderich. If something is unstarred then it guzzle the joly. If something guzzle the fleurette and it is not rapacious then it does not like the izzi. If something misuse the joly then it is unstarred. If something guzzle the fleurette then the fleurette is not unstarred. If something guzzle the izzi and the izzi does not like the roderich then the roderich is tabby. The roderich bituminise the izzi.", "logic": "\nUnstarred(fleurette)\nGuzzle(fleurette, roderich)\nnot Guzzle(roderich, joly)\nTabby(izzi)\nMisuse(izzi, joly)\nRapacious(joly)\nMisuse(joly, izzi)\nforall x (Guzzle(x, joly) -> Bituminise(x, izzi))\nTabby(izzi) -> not Misuse(izzi, roderich)\nSweetheart(izzi) -> not Misuse(izzi, roderich)\nforall x (Unstarred(x) -> Guzzle(x, joly))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, fleurette) and not Rapacious(x) -> not Misuse(x, izzi))\nforall x (Misuse(x, joly) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, fleurette) -> not Unstarred(fleurette))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, izzi) and not Misuse(izzi, roderich) -> Tabby(roderich))\n\nBituminise(roderich, izzi)\n\nforall x (Guzzle(x, joly) -> Bituminise(x, izzi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The gerrit is euphoriant. The gerrit affiance the lorianne. The lorianne does not see the etti. The cassi is titular. The cassi roar the etti. The etti is echolike. The etti roar the cassi. If something affiance the etti then it surface the cassi. If the cassi is titular then the cassi does not like the lorianne. If the cassi is kyphotic then the cassi does not like the lorianne. If something is euphoriant then it affiance the etti. If something affiance the gerrit and it is not echolike then it does not like the cassi. If something roar the etti then it is euphoriant. If something affiance the gerrit then the gerrit is not euphoriant. If something affiance the cassi and the cassi does not like the lorianne then the lorianne is titular. The etti does not see the etti.", "logic": "\nEuphoriant(gerrit)\nAffiance(gerrit, lorianne)\nnot Affiance(lorianne, etti)\nTitular(cassi)\nRoar(cassi, etti)\nEcholike(etti)\nRoar(etti, cassi)\nforall x (Affiance(x, etti) -> Surface(x, cassi))\nTitular(cassi) -> not Roar(cassi, lorianne)\nKyphotic(cassi) -> not Roar(cassi, lorianne)\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) -> Affiance(x, etti))\nforall x (Affiance(x, gerrit) and not Echolike(x) -> not Roar(x, cassi))\nforall x (Roar(x, etti) -> Euphoriant(x))\nforall x (Affiance(x, gerrit) -> not Euphoriant(gerrit))\nforall x (Affiance(x, cassi) and not Roar(cassi, lorianne) -> Titular(lorianne))\n\nnot Affiance(etti, etti)\n\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) -> Affiance(x, etti)) <- forall x (Roar(x, etti) -> Euphoriant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The suellen is ataractic. The suellen misuse the korry. The korry does not see the brigitte. The matthus is inimitable. The matthus disinfect the brigitte. The brigitte is veterinary. The brigitte disinfect the matthus. If something misuse the brigitte then it flex the matthus. If the matthus is inimitable then the matthus does not like the korry. If the matthus is enduring then the matthus does not like the korry. If something is ataractic then it misuse the brigitte. If something misuse the suellen and it is not veterinary then it does not like the matthus. If something disinfect the brigitte then it is ataractic. If something misuse the suellen then the suellen is not ataractic. If something misuse the matthus and the matthus does not like the korry then the korry is inimitable. The korry is inimitable.", "logic": "\nAtaractic(suellen)\nMisuse(suellen, korry)\nnot Misuse(korry, brigitte)\nInimitable(matthus)\nDisinfect(matthus, brigitte)\nVeterinary(brigitte)\nDisinfect(brigitte, matthus)\nforall x (Misuse(x, brigitte) -> Flex(x, matthus))\nInimitable(matthus) -> not Disinfect(matthus, korry)\nEnduring(matthus) -> not Disinfect(matthus, korry)\nforall x (Ataractic(x) -> Misuse(x, brigitte))\nforall x (Misuse(x, suellen) and not Veterinary(x) -> not Disinfect(x, matthus))\nforall x (Disinfect(x, brigitte) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Misuse(x, suellen) -> not Ataractic(suellen))\nforall x (Misuse(x, matthus) and not Disinfect(matthus, korry) -> Inimitable(korry))\n\nInimitable(korry)\n\nforall x (Misuse(x, matthus) and not Disinfect(matthus, korry) -> Inimitable(korry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The daniel is said. The daniel dislodge the pippy. The pippy does not see the zacharie. The danelle is torulose. The danelle submarine the zacharie. The zacharie is tortured. The zacharie submarine the danelle. If something dislodge the zacharie then it outsell the danelle. If the danelle is torulose then the danelle does not like the pippy. If the danelle is plenary then the danelle does not like the pippy. If something is said then it dislodge the zacharie. If something dislodge the daniel and it is not tortured then it does not like the danelle. If something submarine the zacharie then it is said. If something dislodge the daniel then the daniel is not said. If something dislodge the danelle and the danelle does not like the pippy then the pippy is torulose. The danelle does not see the danelle.", "logic": "\nSaid(daniel)\nDislodge(daniel, pippy)\nnot Dislodge(pippy, zacharie)\nTorulose(danelle)\nSubmarine(danelle, zacharie)\nTortured(zacharie)\nSubmarine(zacharie, danelle)\nforall x (Dislodge(x, zacharie) -> Outsell(x, danelle))\nTorulose(danelle) -> not Submarine(danelle, pippy)\nPlenary(danelle) -> not Submarine(danelle, pippy)\nforall x (Said(x) -> Dislodge(x, zacharie))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, daniel) and not Tortured(x) -> not Submarine(x, danelle))\nforall x (Submarine(x, zacharie) -> Said(x))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, daniel) -> not Said(daniel))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, danelle) and not Submarine(danelle, pippy) -> Torulose(pippy))\n\nnot Dislodge(danelle, danelle)\n\nnot Dislodge(danelle, danelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The ginnie is passing. The ginnie arrive the jerri. The jerri does not see the herrmann. The blair is tactile. The blair complain the herrmann. The herrmann is dopey. The herrmann complain the blair. If something arrive the herrmann then it scribble the blair. If the blair is tactile then the blair does not like the jerri. If the blair is reinforced then the blair does not like the jerri. If something is passing then it arrive the herrmann. If something arrive the ginnie and it is not dopey then it does not like the blair. If something complain the herrmann then it is passing. If something arrive the ginnie then the ginnie is not passing. If something arrive the blair and the blair does not like the jerri then the jerri is tactile. The blair complain the blair.", "logic": "\nPassing(ginnie)\nArrive(ginnie, jerri)\nnot Arrive(jerri, herrmann)\nTactile(blair)\nComplain(blair, herrmann)\nDopey(herrmann)\nComplain(herrmann, blair)\nforall x (Arrive(x, herrmann) -> Scribble(x, blair))\nTactile(blair) -> not Complain(blair, jerri)\nReinforced(blair) -> not Complain(blair, jerri)\nforall x (Passing(x) -> Arrive(x, herrmann))\nforall x (Arrive(x, ginnie) and not Dopey(x) -> not Complain(x, blair))\nforall x (Complain(x, herrmann) -> Passing(x))\nforall x (Arrive(x, ginnie) -> not Passing(ginnie))\nforall x (Arrive(x, blair) and not Complain(blair, jerri) -> Tactile(jerri))\n\nComplain(blair, blair)\n\nComplain(blair, blair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The isador is ophthalmic. The isador solarize the toddy. The toddy does not see the elsbeth. The harvard is cubical. The harvard regress the elsbeth. The elsbeth is jocose. The elsbeth regress the harvard. If something solarize the elsbeth then it multiply the harvard. If the harvard is cubical then the harvard does not like the toddy. If the harvard is unimpeded then the harvard does not like the toddy. If something is ophthalmic then it solarize the elsbeth. If something solarize the isador and it is not jocose then it does not like the harvard. If something regress the elsbeth then it is ophthalmic. If something solarize the isador then the isador is not ophthalmic. If something solarize the harvard and the harvard does not like the toddy then the toddy is cubical. The harvard is not round.", "logic": "\nOphthalmic(isador)\nSolarize(isador, toddy)\nnot Solarize(toddy, elsbeth)\nCubical(harvard)\nRegress(harvard, elsbeth)\nJocose(elsbeth)\nRegress(elsbeth, harvard)\nforall x (Solarize(x, elsbeth) -> Multiply(x, harvard))\nCubical(harvard) -> not Regress(harvard, toddy)\nUnimpeded(harvard) -> not Regress(harvard, toddy)\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) -> Solarize(x, elsbeth))\nforall x (Solarize(x, isador) and not Jocose(x) -> not Regress(x, harvard))\nforall x (Regress(x, elsbeth) -> Ophthalmic(x))\nforall x (Solarize(x, isador) -> not Ophthalmic(isador))\nforall x (Solarize(x, harvard) and not Regress(harvard, toddy) -> Cubical(toddy))\n\nnot Round(harvard)\n\nnot Round(harvard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The gabbey is unranked. The gabbey march the caralie. The caralie does not see the estell. The clement is symmetric. The clement uglify the estell. The estell is cutaneal. The estell uglify the clement. If something march the estell then it lour the clement. If the clement is symmetric then the clement does not like the caralie. If the clement is prostyle then the clement does not like the caralie. If something is unranked then it march the estell. If something march the gabbey and it is not cutaneal then it does not like the clement. If something uglify the estell then it is unranked. If something march the gabbey then the gabbey is not unranked. If something march the clement and the clement does not like the caralie then the caralie is symmetric. The estell uglify the estell.", "logic": "\nUnranked(gabbey)\nMarch(gabbey, caralie)\nnot March(caralie, estell)\nSymmetric(clement)\nUglify(clement, estell)\nCutaneal(estell)\nUglify(estell, clement)\nforall x (March(x, estell) -> Lour(x, clement))\nSymmetric(clement) -> not Uglify(clement, caralie)\nProstyle(clement) -> not Uglify(clement, caralie)\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> March(x, estell))\nforall x (March(x, gabbey) and not Cutaneal(x) -> not Uglify(x, clement))\nforall x (Uglify(x, estell) -> Unranked(x))\nforall x (March(x, gabbey) -> not Unranked(gabbey))\nforall x (March(x, clement) and not Uglify(clement, caralie) -> Symmetric(caralie))\n\nUglify(estell, estell)\n\nUglify(estell, estell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "Salomo is malian. Salomo is touched. Malorie is touched. Malorie is disjoint. Malorie is pilose. Malorie is voracious. Malorie is downlike. Forrest is disjoint. Forrest is pilose. Forrest is downlike. All pilose people are malian. If Forrest is malian then Forrest is schmaltzy. If someone is malian and voracious then they are disjoint. If someone is pilose and malian then they are disjoint. Big, schmaltzy people are voracious. All pilose people are touched. Forrest is disjoint.", "logic": "\nMalian(salomo)\nTouched(salomo)\nTouched(malorie)\nDisjoint(malorie)\nPilose(malorie)\nVoracious(malorie)\nDownlike(malorie)\nDisjoint(forrest)\nPilose(forrest)\nDownlike(forrest)\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Malian(x))\nMalian(forrest) -> Schmaltzy(forrest)\nforall x (Malian(x) and Voracious(x) -> Disjoint(x))\nforall x (Pilose(x) and Malian(x) -> Disjoint(x))\nforall x (Malian(x) and Schmaltzy(x) -> Voracious(x))\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Touched(x))\n\nDisjoint(forrest)\n\ntherefore Disjoint(forrest)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Mortie is breezy. Mortie is coagulable. Cristal is coagulable. Cristal is solo. Cristal is unpunished. Cristal is palsied. Cristal is slapdash. Ondrea is solo. Ondrea is unpunished. Ondrea is slapdash. All unpunished people are breezy. If Ondrea is breezy then Ondrea is venerable. If someone is breezy and palsied then they are solo. If someone is unpunished and breezy then they are solo. Big, venerable people are palsied. All unpunished people are coagulable. Mortie is not coagulable.", "logic": "\nBreezy(mortie)\nCoagulable(mortie)\nCoagulable(cristal)\nSolo(cristal)\nUnpunished(cristal)\nPalsied(cristal)\nSlapdash(cristal)\nSolo(ondrea)\nUnpunished(ondrea)\nSlapdash(ondrea)\nforall x (Unpunished(x) -> Breezy(x))\nBreezy(ondrea) -> Venerable(ondrea)\nforall x (Breezy(x) and Palsied(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Unpunished(x) and Breezy(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Breezy(x) and Venerable(x) -> Palsied(x))\nforall x (Unpunished(x) -> Coagulable(x))\n\nnot Coagulable(mortie)\n\ntherefore Coagulable(mortie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Grover is baculiform. Grover is unlabelled. Eleni is unlabelled. Eleni is ripened. Eleni is pestering. Eleni is iranian. Eleni is prismatic. Zebadiah is ripened. Zebadiah is pestering. Zebadiah is prismatic. All pestering people are baculiform. If Zebadiah is baculiform then Zebadiah is norman. If someone is baculiform and iranian then they are ripened. If someone is pestering and baculiform then they are ripened. Big, norman people are iranian. All pestering people are unlabelled. Zebadiah is unlabelled.", "logic": "\nBaculiform(grover)\nUnlabelled(grover)\nUnlabelled(eleni)\nRipened(eleni)\nPestering(eleni)\nIranian(eleni)\nPrismatic(eleni)\nRipened(zebadiah)\nPestering(zebadiah)\nPrismatic(zebadiah)\nforall x (Pestering(x) -> Baculiform(x))\nBaculiform(zebadiah) -> Norman(zebadiah)\nforall x (Baculiform(x) and Iranian(x) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) and Baculiform(x) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Baculiform(x) and Norman(x) -> Iranian(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\n\nUnlabelled(zebadiah)\n\nPestering(zebadiah) and forall x (Pestering(x) -> Unlabelled(x)) -> therefore Unlabelled(zebadiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Julietta is acoustic. Julietta is albuminous. Kaiser is albuminous. Kaiser is lateen. Kaiser is mythologic. Kaiser is nosocomial. Kaiser is thousandth. Dorree is lateen. Dorree is mythologic. Dorree is thousandth. All mythologic people are acoustic. If Dorree is acoustic then Dorree is unclouded. If someone is acoustic and nosocomial then they are lateen. If someone is mythologic and acoustic then they are lateen. Big, unclouded people are nosocomial. All mythologic people are albuminous. Kaiser is not acoustic.", "logic": "\nAcoustic(julietta)\nAlbuminous(julietta)\nAlbuminous(kaiser)\nLateen(kaiser)\nMythologic(kaiser)\nNosocomial(kaiser)\nThousandth(kaiser)\nLateen(dorree)\nMythologic(dorree)\nThousandth(dorree)\nforall x (Mythologic(x) -> Acoustic(x))\nAcoustic(dorree) -> Unclouded(dorree)\nforall x (Acoustic(x) and Nosocomial(x) -> Lateen(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Acoustic(x) -> Lateen(x))\nforall x (Acoustic(x) and Unclouded(x) -> Nosocomial(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) -> Albuminous(x))\n\nnot Acoustic(kaiser)\n\nMythologic(kaiser) and forall x (Mythologic(x) -> Acoustic(x)) -> therefore Acoustic(kaiser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Shaun is couthy. Shaun is sterilised. Annabela is sterilised. Annabela is maladroit. Annabela is undulant. Annabela is dualistic. Annabela is convinced. Dita is maladroit. Dita is undulant. Dita is convinced. All undulant people are couthy. If Dita is couthy then Dita is attic. If someone is couthy and dualistic then they are maladroit. If someone is undulant and couthy then they are maladroit. Big, attic people are dualistic. All undulant people are sterilised. Dita is attic.", "logic": "\nCouthy(shaun)\nSterilised(shaun)\nSterilised(annabela)\nMaladroit(annabela)\nUndulant(annabela)\nDualistic(annabela)\nConvinced(annabela)\nMaladroit(dita)\nUndulant(dita)\nConvinced(dita)\nforall x (Undulant(x) -> Couthy(x))\nCouthy(dita) -> Attic(dita)\nforall x (Couthy(x) and Dualistic(x) -> Maladroit(x))\nforall x (Undulant(x) and Couthy(x) -> Maladroit(x))\nforall x (Couthy(x) and Attic(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Undulant(x) -> Sterilised(x))\n\nAttic(dita)\n\nUndulant(dita) and forall x (Undulant(x) -> Couthy(x)) -> therefore Couthy(dita) Couthy(dita) and Couthy(dita) -> Attic(dita) -> therefore Attic(dita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Meryl is stilly. Meryl is appraising. Sidney is appraising. Sidney is bivalve. Sidney is ellipsoid. Sidney is acrid. Sidney is knobbly. Elora is bivalve. Elora is ellipsoid. Elora is knobbly. All ellipsoid people are stilly. If Elora is stilly then Elora is twoscore. If someone is stilly and acrid then they are bivalve. If someone is ellipsoid and stilly then they are bivalve. Big, twoscore people are acrid. All ellipsoid people are appraising. Elora is not twoscore.", "logic": "\nStilly(meryl)\nAppraising(meryl)\nAppraising(sidney)\nBivalve(sidney)\nEllipsoid(sidney)\nAcrid(sidney)\nKnobbly(sidney)\nBivalve(elora)\nEllipsoid(elora)\nKnobbly(elora)\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> Stilly(x))\nStilly(elora) -> Twoscore(elora)\nforall x (Stilly(x) and Acrid(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Stilly(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Stilly(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Acrid(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> Appraising(x))\n\nnot Twoscore(elora)\n\nEllipsoid(elora) and forall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> Stilly(x)) -> therefore Stilly(elora) Stilly(elora) and Stilly(elora) -> Twoscore(elora) -> therefore Twoscore(elora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Mackenzie is tomentose. Mackenzie is tinkling. Jayne is tinkling. Jayne is unrifled. Jayne is unsoured. Jayne is undeserved. Jayne is ratified. Rosalia is unrifled. Rosalia is unsoured. Rosalia is ratified. All unsoured people are tomentose. If Rosalia is tomentose then Rosalia is laggard. If someone is tomentose and undeserved then they are unrifled. If someone is unsoured and tomentose then they are unrifled. Big, laggard people are undeserved. All unsoured people are tinkling. Rosalia is undeserved.", "logic": "\nTomentose(mackenzie)\nTinkling(mackenzie)\nTinkling(jayne)\nUnrifled(jayne)\nUnsoured(jayne)\nUndeserved(jayne)\nRatified(jayne)\nUnrifled(rosalia)\nUnsoured(rosalia)\nRatified(rosalia)\nforall x (Unsoured(x) -> Tomentose(x))\nTomentose(rosalia) -> Laggard(rosalia)\nforall x (Tomentose(x) and Undeserved(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Unsoured(x) and Tomentose(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Tomentose(x) and Laggard(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Unsoured(x) -> Tinkling(x))\n\nUndeserved(rosalia)\n\nUnsoured(rosalia) and forall x (Unsoured(x) -> Tomentose(x)) -> therefore Tomentose(rosalia) Unsoured(rosalia) and forall x (Unsoured(x) -> Tomentose(x)) -> therefore Tomentose(rosalia) Tomentose(rosalia) and Tomentose(rosalia) -> Laggard(rosalia) -> therefore Laggard(rosalia) Tomentose(rosalia) and Laggard(rosalia) and forall x (Tomentose(x) and Laggard(x) -> Undeserved(x)) -> therefore Undeserved(rosalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Chandra is substitute. Chandra is bloodless. Ely is bloodless. Ely is stock. Ely is fungicidal. Ely is outfitted. Ely is curious. Jobyna is stock. Jobyna is fungicidal. Jobyna is curious. All fungicidal people are substitute. If Jobyna is substitute then Jobyna is wrinkled. If someone is substitute and outfitted then they are stock. If someone is fungicidal and substitute then they are stock. Big, wrinkled people are outfitted. All fungicidal people are bloodless. Jobyna is not outfitted.", "logic": "\nSubstitute(chandra)\nBloodless(chandra)\nBloodless(ely)\nStock(ely)\nFungicidal(ely)\nOutfitted(ely)\nCurious(ely)\nStock(jobyna)\nFungicidal(jobyna)\nCurious(jobyna)\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Substitute(x))\nSubstitute(jobyna) -> Wrinkled(jobyna)\nforall x (Substitute(x) and Outfitted(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) and Substitute(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Substitute(x) and Wrinkled(x) -> Outfitted(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Bloodless(x))\n\nnot Outfitted(jobyna)\n\nFungicidal(jobyna) and forall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Substitute(x)) -> therefore Substitute(jobyna) Fungicidal(jobyna) and forall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Substitute(x)) -> therefore Substitute(jobyna) Substitute(jobyna) and Substitute(jobyna) -> Wrinkled(jobyna) -> therefore Wrinkled(jobyna) Substitute(jobyna) and Wrinkled(jobyna) and forall x (Substitute(x) and Wrinkled(x) -> Outfitted(x)) -> therefore Outfitted(jobyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Biddy is pustulate. Biddy is unwomanly. Renel is unwomanly. Renel is saccharine. Renel is arboreal. Renel is parve. Renel is lifelike. Marcus is saccharine. Marcus is arboreal. Marcus is lifelike. All arboreal people are pustulate. If Marcus is pustulate then Marcus is biface. If someone is pustulate and parve then they are saccharine. If someone is arboreal and pustulate then they are saccharine. Big, biface people are parve. All arboreal people are unwomanly. Biddy is not saccharine.", "logic": "\nPustulate(biddy)\nUnwomanly(biddy)\nUnwomanly(renel)\nSaccharine(renel)\nArboreal(renel)\nParve(renel)\nLifelike(renel)\nSaccharine(marcus)\nArboreal(marcus)\nLifelike(marcus)\nforall x (Arboreal(x) -> Pustulate(x))\nPustulate(marcus) -> Biface(marcus)\nforall x (Pustulate(x) and Parve(x) -> Saccharine(x))\nforall x (Arboreal(x) and Pustulate(x) -> Saccharine(x))\nforall x (Pustulate(x) and Biface(x) -> Parve(x))\nforall x (Arboreal(x) -> Unwomanly(x))\n\nnot Saccharine(biddy)\n\nforall x (Pustulate(x) and Parve(x) -> Saccharine(x)) <- forall x (Pustulate(x) and Biface(x) -> Parve(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Marti is stilted. Marti is weatherly. Joscelin is weatherly. Joscelin is timeworn. Joscelin is dropsical. Joscelin is some. Joscelin is scarce. Anatole is timeworn. Anatole is dropsical. Anatole is scarce. All dropsical people are stilted. If Anatole is stilted then Anatole is disputable. If someone is stilted and some then they are timeworn. If someone is dropsical and stilted then they are timeworn. Big, disputable people are some. All dropsical people are weatherly. Marti is some.", "logic": "\nStilted(marti)\nWeatherly(marti)\nWeatherly(joscelin)\nTimeworn(joscelin)\nDropsical(joscelin)\nSome(joscelin)\nScarce(joscelin)\nTimeworn(anatole)\nDropsical(anatole)\nScarce(anatole)\nforall x (Dropsical(x) -> Stilted(x))\nStilted(anatole) -> Disputable(anatole)\nforall x (Stilted(x) and Some(x) -> Timeworn(x))\nforall x (Dropsical(x) and Stilted(x) -> Timeworn(x))\nforall x (Stilted(x) and Disputable(x) -> Some(x))\nforall x (Dropsical(x) -> Weatherly(x))\n\nSome(marti)\n\nforall x (Stilted(x) and Disputable(x) -> Some(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Mady is recurvate. Mady is impure. Torrin is impure. Torrin is sunset. Torrin is toothless. Torrin is sheer. Torrin is genealogic. Dione is sunset. Dione is toothless. Dione is genealogic. All toothless people are recurvate. If Dione is recurvate then Dione is chlorotic. If someone is recurvate and sheer then they are sunset. If someone is toothless and recurvate then they are sunset. Big, chlorotic people are sheer. All toothless people are impure. Mady is not chlorotic.", "logic": "\nRecurvate(mady)\nImpure(mady)\nImpure(torrin)\nSunset(torrin)\nToothless(torrin)\nSheer(torrin)\nGenealogic(torrin)\nSunset(dione)\nToothless(dione)\nGenealogic(dione)\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nRecurvate(dione) -> Chlorotic(dione)\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and Sheer(x) -> Sunset(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) and Recurvate(x) -> Sunset(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and Chlorotic(x) -> Sheer(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Impure(x))\n\nnot Chlorotic(mady)\n\nnot Chlorotic(mady) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Dinah is forty. Dinah is upward. Dedra is upward. Dedra is tinny. Dedra is unwilling. Dedra is pursued. Dedra is topping. Loren is tinny. Loren is unwilling. Loren is topping. All unwilling people are forty. If Loren is forty then Loren is shrewd. If someone is forty and pursued then they are tinny. If someone is unwilling and forty then they are tinny. Big, shrewd people are pursued. All unwilling people are upward. Dinah is unwilling.", "logic": "\nForty(dinah)\nUpward(dinah)\nUpward(dedra)\nTinny(dedra)\nUnwilling(dedra)\nPursued(dedra)\nTopping(dedra)\nTinny(loren)\nUnwilling(loren)\nTopping(loren)\nforall x (Unwilling(x) -> Forty(x))\nForty(loren) -> Shrewd(loren)\nforall x (Forty(x) and Pursued(x) -> Tinny(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and Forty(x) -> Tinny(x))\nforall x (Forty(x) and Shrewd(x) -> Pursued(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) -> Upward(x))\n\nUnwilling(dinah)\n\nUnwilling(dinah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Butch is throwaway. Butch is subjugable. Buster is subjugable. Buster is ginger. Buster is rustic. Buster is drudging. Buster is ablative. Agata is ginger. Agata is rustic. Agata is ablative. All rustic people are throwaway. If Agata is throwaway then Agata is best. If someone is throwaway and drudging then they are ginger. If someone is rustic and throwaway then they are ginger. Big, best people are drudging. All rustic people are subjugable. Buster is not best.", "logic": "\nThrowaway(butch)\nSubjugable(butch)\nSubjugable(buster)\nGinger(buster)\nRustic(buster)\nDrudging(buster)\nAblative(buster)\nGinger(agata)\nRustic(agata)\nAblative(agata)\nforall x (Rustic(x) -> Throwaway(x))\nThrowaway(agata) -> Best(agata)\nforall x (Throwaway(x) and Drudging(x) -> Ginger(x))\nforall x (Rustic(x) and Throwaway(x) -> Ginger(x))\nforall x (Throwaway(x) and Best(x) -> Drudging(x))\nforall x (Rustic(x) -> Subjugable(x))\n\nnot Best(buster)\n\nnot Best(buster) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Johanna is farfetched. Johanna is grenadian. Bari is grenadian. Bari is pilose. Bari is ireful. Bari is delicious. Bari is summery. Davis is pilose. Davis is ireful. Davis is summery. All ireful people are farfetched. If Davis is farfetched then Davis is intangible. If someone is farfetched and delicious then they are pilose. If someone is ireful and farfetched then they are pilose. Big, intangible people are delicious. All ireful people are grenadian. Johanna is summery.", "logic": "\nFarfetched(johanna)\nGrenadian(johanna)\nGrenadian(bari)\nPilose(bari)\nIreful(bari)\nDelicious(bari)\nSummery(bari)\nPilose(davis)\nIreful(davis)\nSummery(davis)\nforall x (Ireful(x) -> Farfetched(x))\nFarfetched(davis) -> Intangible(davis)\nforall x (Farfetched(x) and Delicious(x) -> Pilose(x))\nforall x (Ireful(x) and Farfetched(x) -> Pilose(x))\nforall x (Farfetched(x) and Intangible(x) -> Delicious(x))\nforall x (Ireful(x) -> Grenadian(x))\n\nSummery(johanna)\n\nSummery(johanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "The zaria excuse the wilone. The zaria excuse the hashim. The zaria is genital. The zaria is semipublic. The zaria is scripted. The zaria mobilise the wilone. The wilone excuse the hashim. The wilone stick the hashim. The wilone is not semipublic. The wilone does not visit the hashim. The hashim excuse the zaria. The hashim stick the zaria. The hashim does not eat the wilone. The hashim is semipublic. The hashim mobilise the zaria. The hashim mobilise the wilone. If the wilone stick the zaria then the wilone excuse the zaria. If something excuse the zaria and the zaria mobilise the wilone then the wilone stick the zaria. If something is semipublic and it does not eat the zaria then it is antiguan. If something excuse the zaria and the zaria is semipublic then it is antiguan. If something is antiguan and semipublic then it stick the hashim. If something is semipublic and it does not visit the hashim then it stick the hashim. The zaria is semipublic.", "logic": "\nExcuse(zaria, wilone)\nExcuse(zaria, hashim)\nGenital(zaria)\nSemipublic(zaria)\nScripted(zaria)\nMobilise(zaria, wilone)\nExcuse(wilone, hashim)\nStick(wilone, hashim)\nnot Semipublic(wilone)\nnot Mobilise(wilone, hashim)\nExcuse(hashim, zaria)\nStick(hashim, zaria)\nnot Stick(hashim, wilone)\nSemipublic(hashim)\nMobilise(hashim, zaria)\nMobilise(hashim, wilone)\nStick(wilone, zaria) -> Excuse(wilone, zaria)\nforall x (Excuse(x, zaria) and Mobilise(zaria, wilone) -> Stick(wilone, zaria))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) and not Stick(x, zaria) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Excuse(x, zaria) and Semipublic(zaria) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Antiguan(x) and Semipublic(x) -> Stick(x, hashim))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) and not Mobilise(x, hashim) -> Stick(x, hashim))\n\nSemipublic(zaria)\n\ntherefore Semipublic(zaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The laurella besiege the herby. The laurella besiege the reynold. The laurella is hedonistic. The laurella is puff. The laurella is arboriform. The laurella inactivate the herby. The herby besiege the reynold. The herby unburden the reynold. The herby is not puff. The herby does not visit the reynold. The reynold besiege the laurella. The reynold unburden the laurella. The reynold does not eat the herby. The reynold is puff. The reynold inactivate the laurella. The reynold inactivate the herby. If the herby unburden the laurella then the herby besiege the laurella. If something besiege the laurella and the laurella inactivate the herby then the herby unburden the laurella. If something is puff and it does not eat the laurella then it is used. If something besiege the laurella and the laurella is puff then it is used. If something is used and puff then it unburden the reynold. If something is puff and it does not visit the reynold then it unburden the reynold. The laurella does not visit the herby.", "logic": "\nBesiege(laurella, herby)\nBesiege(laurella, reynold)\nHedonistic(laurella)\nPuff(laurella)\nArboriform(laurella)\nInactivate(laurella, herby)\nBesiege(herby, reynold)\nUnburden(herby, reynold)\nnot Puff(herby)\nnot Inactivate(herby, reynold)\nBesiege(reynold, laurella)\nUnburden(reynold, laurella)\nnot Unburden(reynold, herby)\nPuff(reynold)\nInactivate(reynold, laurella)\nInactivate(reynold, herby)\nUnburden(herby, laurella) -> Besiege(herby, laurella)\nforall x (Besiege(x, laurella) and Inactivate(laurella, herby) -> Unburden(herby, laurella))\nforall x (Puff(x) and not Unburden(x, laurella) -> Used(x))\nforall x (Besiege(x, laurella) and Puff(laurella) -> Used(x))\nforall x (Used(x) and Puff(x) -> Unburden(x, reynold))\nforall x (Puff(x) and not Inactivate(x, reynold) -> Unburden(x, reynold))\n\nnot Inactivate(laurella, herby)\n\ntherefore Inactivate(laurella, herby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The thaddius slow the mamie. The thaddius slow the dylan. The thaddius is westmost. The thaddius is pastel. The thaddius is aneurysmal. The thaddius shrive the mamie. The mamie slow the dylan. The mamie bell the dylan. The mamie is not pastel. The mamie does not visit the dylan. The dylan slow the thaddius. The dylan bell the thaddius. The dylan does not eat the mamie. The dylan is pastel. The dylan shrive the thaddius. The dylan shrive the mamie. If the mamie bell the thaddius then the mamie slow the thaddius. If something slow the thaddius and the thaddius shrive the mamie then the mamie bell the thaddius. If something is pastel and it does not eat the thaddius then it is scheduled. If something slow the thaddius and the thaddius is pastel then it is scheduled. If something is scheduled and pastel then it bell the dylan. If something is pastel and it does not visit the dylan then it bell the dylan. The mamie bell the thaddius.", "logic": "\nSlow(thaddius, mamie)\nSlow(thaddius, dylan)\nWestmost(thaddius)\nPastel(thaddius)\nAneurysmal(thaddius)\nShrive(thaddius, mamie)\nSlow(mamie, dylan)\nBell(mamie, dylan)\nnot Pastel(mamie)\nnot Shrive(mamie, dylan)\nSlow(dylan, thaddius)\nBell(dylan, thaddius)\nnot Bell(dylan, mamie)\nPastel(dylan)\nShrive(dylan, thaddius)\nShrive(dylan, mamie)\nBell(mamie, thaddius) -> Slow(mamie, thaddius)\nforall x (Slow(x, thaddius) and Shrive(thaddius, mamie) -> Bell(mamie, thaddius))\nforall x (Pastel(x) and not Bell(x, thaddius) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Slow(x, thaddius) and Pastel(thaddius) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) and Pastel(x) -> Bell(x, dylan))\nforall x (Pastel(x) and not Shrive(x, dylan) -> Bell(x, dylan))\n\nBell(mamie, thaddius)\n\nSlow(dylan, thaddius) and Shrive(thaddius, mamie) and forall x (Slow(x, thaddius) and Shrive(thaddius, mamie) -> Bell(mamie, thaddius)) -> therefore Bell(mamie, thaddius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The elspeth coin the elbertine. The elspeth coin the avram. The elspeth is infirm. The elspeth is scalar. The elspeth is stifling. The elspeth chug the elbertine. The elbertine coin the avram. The elbertine jelly the avram. The elbertine is not scalar. The elbertine does not visit the avram. The avram coin the elspeth. The avram jelly the elspeth. The avram does not eat the elbertine. The avram is scalar. The avram chug the elspeth. The avram chug the elbertine. If the elbertine jelly the elspeth then the elbertine coin the elspeth. If something coin the elspeth and the elspeth chug the elbertine then the elbertine jelly the elspeth. If something is scalar and it does not eat the elspeth then it is terse. If something coin the elspeth and the elspeth is scalar then it is terse. If something is terse and scalar then it jelly the avram. If something is scalar and it does not visit the avram then it jelly the avram. The elbertine does not eat the elspeth.", "logic": "\nCoin(elspeth, elbertine)\nCoin(elspeth, avram)\nInfirm(elspeth)\nScalar(elspeth)\nStifling(elspeth)\nChug(elspeth, elbertine)\nCoin(elbertine, avram)\nJelly(elbertine, avram)\nnot Scalar(elbertine)\nnot Chug(elbertine, avram)\nCoin(avram, elspeth)\nJelly(avram, elspeth)\nnot Jelly(avram, elbertine)\nScalar(avram)\nChug(avram, elspeth)\nChug(avram, elbertine)\nJelly(elbertine, elspeth) -> Coin(elbertine, elspeth)\nforall x (Coin(x, elspeth) and Chug(elspeth, elbertine) -> Jelly(elbertine, elspeth))\nforall x (Scalar(x) and not Jelly(x, elspeth) -> Terse(x))\nforall x (Coin(x, elspeth) and Scalar(elspeth) -> Terse(x))\nforall x (Terse(x) and Scalar(x) -> Jelly(x, avram))\nforall x (Scalar(x) and not Chug(x, avram) -> Jelly(x, avram))\n\nnot Jelly(elbertine, elspeth)\n\nCoin(avram, elspeth) and Chug(elspeth, elbertine) and forall x (Coin(x, elspeth) and Chug(elspeth, elbertine) -> Jelly(elbertine, elspeth)) -> therefore Jelly(elbertine, elspeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The zondra saturate the mallory. The zondra saturate the tallia. The zondra is unlatched. The zondra is eventual. The zondra is lustreless. The zondra bechance the mallory. The mallory saturate the tallia. The mallory rumour the tallia. The mallory is not eventual. The mallory does not visit the tallia. The tallia saturate the zondra. The tallia rumour the zondra. The tallia does not eat the mallory. The tallia is eventual. The tallia bechance the zondra. The tallia bechance the mallory. If the mallory rumour the zondra then the mallory saturate the zondra. If something saturate the zondra and the zondra bechance the mallory then the mallory rumour the zondra. If something is eventual and it does not eat the zondra then it is nutbrown. If something saturate the zondra and the zondra is eventual then it is nutbrown. If something is nutbrown and eventual then it rumour the tallia. If something is eventual and it does not visit the tallia then it rumour the tallia. The tallia rumour the tallia.", "logic": "\nSaturate(zondra, mallory)\nSaturate(zondra, tallia)\nUnlatched(zondra)\nEventual(zondra)\nLustreless(zondra)\nBechance(zondra, mallory)\nSaturate(mallory, tallia)\nRumour(mallory, tallia)\nnot Eventual(mallory)\nnot Bechance(mallory, tallia)\nSaturate(tallia, zondra)\nRumour(tallia, zondra)\nnot Rumour(tallia, mallory)\nEventual(tallia)\nBechance(tallia, zondra)\nBechance(tallia, mallory)\nRumour(mallory, zondra) -> Saturate(mallory, zondra)\nforall x (Saturate(x, zondra) and Bechance(zondra, mallory) -> Rumour(mallory, zondra))\nforall x (Eventual(x) and not Rumour(x, zondra) -> Nutbrown(x))\nforall x (Saturate(x, zondra) and Eventual(zondra) -> Nutbrown(x))\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) and Eventual(x) -> Rumour(x, tallia))\nforall x (Eventual(x) and not Bechance(x, tallia) -> Rumour(x, tallia))\n\nRumour(tallia, tallia)\n\nSaturate(tallia, zondra) and Eventual(zondra) and forall x (Saturate(x, zondra) and Eventual(zondra) -> Nutbrown(x)) -> therefore Nutbrown(tallia) Nutbrown(tallia) and Eventual(tallia) and forall x (Nutbrown(x) and Eventual(x) -> Rumour(x, tallia)) -> therefore Rumour(tallia, tallia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The red notarise the mohammad. The red notarise the chere. The red is collagenic. The red is smothered. The red is rickety. The red ignite the mohammad. The mohammad notarise the chere. The mohammad send the chere. The mohammad is not smothered. The mohammad does not visit the chere. The chere notarise the red. The chere send the red. The chere does not eat the mohammad. The chere is smothered. The chere ignite the red. The chere ignite the mohammad. If the mohammad send the red then the mohammad notarise the red. If something notarise the red and the red ignite the mohammad then the mohammad send the red. If something is smothered and it does not eat the red then it is executive. If something notarise the red and the red is smothered then it is executive. If something is executive and smothered then it send the chere. If something is smothered and it does not visit the chere then it send the chere. The mohammad does not chase the red.", "logic": "\nNotarise(red, mohammad)\nNotarise(red, chere)\nCollagenic(red)\nSmothered(red)\nRickety(red)\nIgnite(red, mohammad)\nNotarise(mohammad, chere)\nSend(mohammad, chere)\nnot Smothered(mohammad)\nnot Ignite(mohammad, chere)\nNotarise(chere, red)\nSend(chere, red)\nnot Send(chere, mohammad)\nSmothered(chere)\nIgnite(chere, red)\nIgnite(chere, mohammad)\nSend(mohammad, red) -> Notarise(mohammad, red)\nforall x (Notarise(x, red) and Ignite(red, mohammad) -> Send(mohammad, red))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and not Send(x, red) -> Executive(x))\nforall x (Notarise(x, red) and Smothered(red) -> Executive(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) and Smothered(x) -> Send(x, chere))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and not Ignite(x, chere) -> Send(x, chere))\n\nnot Notarise(mohammad, red)\n\nNotarise(chere, red) and Ignite(red, mohammad) and forall x (Notarise(x, red) and Ignite(red, mohammad) -> Send(mohammad, red)) -> therefore Send(mohammad, red) Send(mohammad, red) and Send(mohammad, red) -> Notarise(mohammad, red) -> therefore Notarise(mohammad, red)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The laney realize the lissi. The laney realize the ender. The laney is sinuate. The laney is precursory. The laney is argentous. The laney endorse the lissi. The lissi realize the ender. The lissi disparage the ender. The lissi is not precursory. The lissi does not visit the ender. The ender realize the laney. The ender disparage the laney. The ender does not eat the lissi. The ender is precursory. The ender endorse the laney. The ender endorse the lissi. If the lissi disparage the laney then the lissi realize the laney. If something realize the laney and the laney endorse the lissi then the lissi disparage the laney. If something is precursory and it does not eat the laney then it is dazzled. If something realize the laney and the laney is precursory then it is dazzled. If something is dazzled and precursory then it disparage the ender. If something is precursory and it does not visit the ender then it disparage the ender. The lissi is dazzled.", "logic": "\nRealize(laney, lissi)\nRealize(laney, ender)\nSinuate(laney)\nPrecursory(laney)\nArgentous(laney)\nEndorse(laney, lissi)\nRealize(lissi, ender)\nDisparage(lissi, ender)\nnot Precursory(lissi)\nnot Endorse(lissi, ender)\nRealize(ender, laney)\nDisparage(ender, laney)\nnot Disparage(ender, lissi)\nPrecursory(ender)\nEndorse(ender, laney)\nEndorse(ender, lissi)\nDisparage(lissi, laney) -> Realize(lissi, laney)\nforall x (Realize(x, laney) and Endorse(laney, lissi) -> Disparage(lissi, laney))\nforall x (Precursory(x) and not Disparage(x, laney) -> Dazzled(x))\nforall x (Realize(x, laney) and Precursory(laney) -> Dazzled(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) and Precursory(x) -> Disparage(x, ender))\nforall x (Precursory(x) and not Endorse(x, ender) -> Disparage(x, ender))\n\nDazzled(lissi)\n\nRealize(ender, laney) and Endorse(laney, lissi) and forall x (Realize(x, laney) and Endorse(laney, lissi) -> Disparage(lissi, laney)) -> therefore Disparage(lissi, laney) Disparage(lissi, laney) and Disparage(lissi, laney) -> Realize(lissi, laney) -> therefore Realize(lissi, laney) Realize(lissi, laney) and Precursory(laney) and forall x (Realize(x, laney) and Precursory(laney) -> Dazzled(x)) -> therefore Dazzled(lissi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The hedda iodize the gustave. The hedda iodize the lesya. The hedda is creative. The hedda is adnate. The hedda is taoist. The hedda abrogate the gustave. The gustave iodize the lesya. The gustave disembroil the lesya. The gustave is not adnate. The gustave does not visit the lesya. The lesya iodize the hedda. The lesya disembroil the hedda. The lesya does not eat the gustave. The lesya is adnate. The lesya abrogate the hedda. The lesya abrogate the gustave. If the gustave disembroil the hedda then the gustave iodize the hedda. If something iodize the hedda and the hedda abrogate the gustave then the gustave disembroil the hedda. If something is adnate and it does not eat the hedda then it is cotyloid. If something iodize the hedda and the hedda is adnate then it is cotyloid. If something is cotyloid and adnate then it disembroil the lesya. If something is adnate and it does not visit the lesya then it disembroil the lesya. The gustave is not cotyloid.", "logic": "\nIodize(hedda, gustave)\nIodize(hedda, lesya)\nCreative(hedda)\nAdnate(hedda)\nTaoist(hedda)\nAbrogate(hedda, gustave)\nIodize(gustave, lesya)\nDisembroil(gustave, lesya)\nnot Adnate(gustave)\nnot Abrogate(gustave, lesya)\nIodize(lesya, hedda)\nDisembroil(lesya, hedda)\nnot Disembroil(lesya, gustave)\nAdnate(lesya)\nAbrogate(lesya, hedda)\nAbrogate(lesya, gustave)\nDisembroil(gustave, hedda) -> Iodize(gustave, hedda)\nforall x (Iodize(x, hedda) and Abrogate(hedda, gustave) -> Disembroil(gustave, hedda))\nforall x (Adnate(x) and not Disembroil(x, hedda) -> Cotyloid(x))\nforall x (Iodize(x, hedda) and Adnate(hedda) -> Cotyloid(x))\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) and Adnate(x) -> Disembroil(x, lesya))\nforall x (Adnate(x) and not Abrogate(x, lesya) -> Disembroil(x, lesya))\n\nnot Cotyloid(gustave)\n\nIodize(lesya, hedda) and Abrogate(hedda, gustave) and forall x (Iodize(x, hedda) and Abrogate(hedda, gustave) -> Disembroil(gustave, hedda)) -> therefore Disembroil(gustave, hedda) Disembroil(gustave, hedda) and Disembroil(gustave, hedda) -> Iodize(gustave, hedda) -> therefore Iodize(gustave, hedda) Iodize(gustave, hedda) and Adnate(hedda) and forall x (Iodize(x, hedda) and Adnate(hedda) -> Cotyloid(x)) -> therefore Cotyloid(gustave)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The emilee welsh the eliza. The emilee welsh the pierce. The emilee is elating. The emilee is glary. The emilee is crannied. The emilee alkalinize the eliza. The eliza welsh the pierce. The eliza discerp the pierce. The eliza is not glary. The eliza does not visit the pierce. The pierce welsh the emilee. The pierce discerp the emilee. The pierce does not eat the eliza. The pierce is glary. The pierce alkalinize the emilee. The pierce alkalinize the eliza. If the eliza discerp the emilee then the eliza welsh the emilee. If something welsh the emilee and the emilee alkalinize the eliza then the eliza discerp the emilee. If something is glary and it does not eat the emilee then it is qatari. If something welsh the emilee and the emilee is glary then it is qatari. If something is qatari and glary then it discerp the pierce. If something is glary and it does not visit the pierce then it discerp the pierce. The emilee does not eat the pierce.", "logic": "\nWelsh(emilee, eliza)\nWelsh(emilee, pierce)\nElating(emilee)\nGlary(emilee)\nCrannied(emilee)\nAlkalinize(emilee, eliza)\nWelsh(eliza, pierce)\nDiscerp(eliza, pierce)\nnot Glary(eliza)\nnot Alkalinize(eliza, pierce)\nWelsh(pierce, emilee)\nDiscerp(pierce, emilee)\nnot Discerp(pierce, eliza)\nGlary(pierce)\nAlkalinize(pierce, emilee)\nAlkalinize(pierce, eliza)\nDiscerp(eliza, emilee) -> Welsh(eliza, emilee)\nforall x (Welsh(x, emilee) and Alkalinize(emilee, eliza) -> Discerp(eliza, emilee))\nforall x (Glary(x) and not Discerp(x, emilee) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Welsh(x, emilee) and Glary(emilee) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Qatari(x) and Glary(x) -> Discerp(x, pierce))\nforall x (Glary(x) and not Alkalinize(x, pierce) -> Discerp(x, pierce))\n\nnot Discerp(emilee, pierce)\n\nforall x (Qatari(x) and Glary(x) -> Discerp(x, pierce)) <- forall x (Glary(x) and not Discerp(x, emilee) -> Qatari(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The anabella stun the conan. The anabella stun the devonna. The anabella is reverend. The anabella is adducting. The anabella is paroicous. The anabella trip the conan. The conan stun the devonna. The conan whirr the devonna. The conan is not adducting. The conan does not visit the devonna. The devonna stun the anabella. The devonna whirr the anabella. The devonna does not eat the conan. The devonna is adducting. The devonna trip the anabella. The devonna trip the conan. If the conan whirr the anabella then the conan stun the anabella. If something stun the anabella and the anabella trip the conan then the conan whirr the anabella. If something is adducting and it does not eat the anabella then it is humongous. If something stun the anabella and the anabella is adducting then it is humongous. If something is humongous and adducting then it whirr the devonna. If something is adducting and it does not visit the devonna then it whirr the devonna. The anabella is humongous.", "logic": "\nStun(anabella, conan)\nStun(anabella, devonna)\nReverend(anabella)\nAdducting(anabella)\nParoicous(anabella)\nTrip(anabella, conan)\nStun(conan, devonna)\nWhirr(conan, devonna)\nnot Adducting(conan)\nnot Trip(conan, devonna)\nStun(devonna, anabella)\nWhirr(devonna, anabella)\nnot Whirr(devonna, conan)\nAdducting(devonna)\nTrip(devonna, anabella)\nTrip(devonna, conan)\nWhirr(conan, anabella) -> Stun(conan, anabella)\nforall x (Stun(x, anabella) and Trip(anabella, conan) -> Whirr(conan, anabella))\nforall x (Adducting(x) and not Whirr(x, anabella) -> Humongous(x))\nforall x (Stun(x, anabella) and Adducting(anabella) -> Humongous(x))\nforall x (Humongous(x) and Adducting(x) -> Whirr(x, devonna))\nforall x (Adducting(x) and not Trip(x, devonna) -> Whirr(x, devonna))\n\nHumongous(anabella)\n\nforall x (Adducting(x) and not Whirr(x, anabella) -> Humongous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The garrot cavern the carry. The garrot cavern the catharina. The garrot is stranded. The garrot is unreadable. The garrot is jetting. The garrot uniformize the carry. The carry cavern the catharina. The carry formulate the catharina. The carry is not unreadable. The carry does not visit the catharina. The catharina cavern the garrot. The catharina formulate the garrot. The catharina does not eat the carry. The catharina is unreadable. The catharina uniformize the garrot. The catharina uniformize the carry. If the carry formulate the garrot then the carry cavern the garrot. If something cavern the garrot and the garrot uniformize the carry then the carry formulate the garrot. If something is unreadable and it does not eat the garrot then it is errant. If something cavern the garrot and the garrot is unreadable then it is errant. If something is errant and unreadable then it formulate the catharina. If something is unreadable and it does not visit the catharina then it formulate the catharina. The garrot does not chase the garrot.", "logic": "\nCavern(garrot, carry)\nCavern(garrot, catharina)\nStranded(garrot)\nUnreadable(garrot)\nJetting(garrot)\nUniformize(garrot, carry)\nCavern(carry, catharina)\nFormulate(carry, catharina)\nnot Unreadable(carry)\nnot Uniformize(carry, catharina)\nCavern(catharina, garrot)\nFormulate(catharina, garrot)\nnot Formulate(catharina, carry)\nUnreadable(catharina)\nUniformize(catharina, garrot)\nUniformize(catharina, carry)\nFormulate(carry, garrot) -> Cavern(carry, garrot)\nforall x (Cavern(x, garrot) and Uniformize(garrot, carry) -> Formulate(carry, garrot))\nforall x (Unreadable(x) and not Formulate(x, garrot) -> Errant(x))\nforall x (Cavern(x, garrot) and Unreadable(garrot) -> Errant(x))\nforall x (Errant(x) and Unreadable(x) -> Formulate(x, catharina))\nforall x (Unreadable(x) and not Uniformize(x, catharina) -> Formulate(x, catharina))\n\nnot Cavern(garrot, garrot)\n\nnot Cavern(garrot, garrot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The lark kneecap the mina. The lark kneecap the chan. The lark is assumed. The lark is comfy. The lark is furrowed. The lark allure the mina. The mina kneecap the chan. The mina legislate the chan. The mina is not comfy. The mina does not visit the chan. The chan kneecap the lark. The chan legislate the lark. The chan does not eat the mina. The chan is comfy. The chan allure the lark. The chan allure the mina. If the mina legislate the lark then the mina kneecap the lark. If something kneecap the lark and the lark allure the mina then the mina legislate the lark. If something is comfy and it does not eat the lark then it is foliated. If something kneecap the lark and the lark is comfy then it is foliated. If something is foliated and comfy then it legislate the chan. If something is comfy and it does not visit the chan then it legislate the chan. The mina legislate the mina.", "logic": "\nKneecap(lark, mina)\nKneecap(lark, chan)\nAssumed(lark)\nComfy(lark)\nFurrowed(lark)\nAllure(lark, mina)\nKneecap(mina, chan)\nLegislate(mina, chan)\nnot Comfy(mina)\nnot Allure(mina, chan)\nKneecap(chan, lark)\nLegislate(chan, lark)\nnot Legislate(chan, mina)\nComfy(chan)\nAllure(chan, lark)\nAllure(chan, mina)\nLegislate(mina, lark) -> Kneecap(mina, lark)\nforall x (Kneecap(x, lark) and Allure(lark, mina) -> Legislate(mina, lark))\nforall x (Comfy(x) and not Legislate(x, lark) -> Foliated(x))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, lark) and Comfy(lark) -> Foliated(x))\nforall x (Foliated(x) and Comfy(x) -> Legislate(x, chan))\nforall x (Comfy(x) and not Allure(x, chan) -> Legislate(x, chan))\n\nLegislate(mina, mina)\n\nLegislate(mina, mina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The tye wrong the alex. The tye wrong the daune. The tye is unsubdued. The tye is liberal. The tye is unhinged. The tye flout the alex. The alex wrong the daune. The alex disable the daune. The alex is not liberal. The alex does not visit the daune. The daune wrong the tye. The daune disable the tye. The daune does not eat the alex. The daune is liberal. The daune flout the tye. The daune flout the alex. If the alex disable the tye then the alex wrong the tye. If something wrong the tye and the tye flout the alex then the alex disable the tye. If something is liberal and it does not eat the tye then it is aglow. If something wrong the tye and the tye is liberal then it is aglow. If something is aglow and liberal then it disable the daune. If something is liberal and it does not visit the daune then it disable the daune. The alex does not chase the alex.", "logic": "\nWrong(tye, alex)\nWrong(tye, daune)\nUnsubdued(tye)\nLiberal(tye)\nUnhinged(tye)\nFlout(tye, alex)\nWrong(alex, daune)\nDisable(alex, daune)\nnot Liberal(alex)\nnot Flout(alex, daune)\nWrong(daune, tye)\nDisable(daune, tye)\nnot Disable(daune, alex)\nLiberal(daune)\nFlout(daune, tye)\nFlout(daune, alex)\nDisable(alex, tye) -> Wrong(alex, tye)\nforall x (Wrong(x, tye) and Flout(tye, alex) -> Disable(alex, tye))\nforall x (Liberal(x) and not Disable(x, tye) -> Aglow(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x, tye) and Liberal(tye) -> Aglow(x))\nforall x (Aglow(x) and Liberal(x) -> Disable(x, daune))\nforall x (Liberal(x) and not Flout(x, daune) -> Disable(x, daune))\n\nnot Wrong(alex, alex)\n\nnot Wrong(alex, alex) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The garvin elect the maegan. The garvin elect the constanta. The garvin is smoothened. The garvin is nonopening. The garvin is addictive. The garvin syringe the maegan. The maegan elect the constanta. The maegan cite the constanta. The maegan is not nonopening. The maegan does not visit the constanta. The constanta elect the garvin. The constanta cite the garvin. The constanta does not eat the maegan. The constanta is nonopening. The constanta syringe the garvin. The constanta syringe the maegan. If the maegan cite the garvin then the maegan elect the garvin. If something elect the garvin and the garvin syringe the maegan then the maegan cite the garvin. If something is nonopening and it does not eat the garvin then it is abranchial. If something elect the garvin and the garvin is nonopening then it is abranchial. If something is abranchial and nonopening then it cite the constanta. If something is nonopening and it does not visit the constanta then it cite the constanta. The constanta is smoothened.", "logic": "\nElect(garvin, maegan)\nElect(garvin, constanta)\nSmoothened(garvin)\nNonopening(garvin)\nAddictive(garvin)\nSyringe(garvin, maegan)\nElect(maegan, constanta)\nCite(maegan, constanta)\nnot Nonopening(maegan)\nnot Syringe(maegan, constanta)\nElect(constanta, garvin)\nCite(constanta, garvin)\nnot Cite(constanta, maegan)\nNonopening(constanta)\nSyringe(constanta, garvin)\nSyringe(constanta, maegan)\nCite(maegan, garvin) -> Elect(maegan, garvin)\nforall x (Elect(x, garvin) and Syringe(garvin, maegan) -> Cite(maegan, garvin))\nforall x (Nonopening(x) and not Cite(x, garvin) -> Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Elect(x, garvin) and Nonopening(garvin) -> Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) and Nonopening(x) -> Cite(x, constanta))\nforall x (Nonopening(x) and not Syringe(x, constanta) -> Cite(x, constanta))\n\nSmoothened(constanta)\n\nSmoothened(constanta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The quentin trill the hartwell. The quentin trill the wald. The quentin is manic. The quentin is coming. The quentin is rush. The quentin besiege the hartwell. The hartwell trill the wald. The hartwell japan the wald. The hartwell is not coming. The hartwell does not visit the wald. The wald trill the quentin. The wald japan the quentin. The wald does not eat the hartwell. The wald is coming. The wald besiege the quentin. The wald besiege the hartwell. If the hartwell japan the quentin then the hartwell trill the quentin. If something trill the quentin and the quentin besiege the hartwell then the hartwell japan the quentin. If something is coming and it does not eat the quentin then it is dovish. If something trill the quentin and the quentin is coming then it is dovish. If something is dovish and coming then it japan the wald. If something is coming and it does not visit the wald then it japan the wald. The wald does not chase the wald.", "logic": "\nTrill(quentin, hartwell)\nTrill(quentin, wald)\nManic(quentin)\nComing(quentin)\nRush(quentin)\nBesiege(quentin, hartwell)\nTrill(hartwell, wald)\nJapan(hartwell, wald)\nnot Coming(hartwell)\nnot Besiege(hartwell, wald)\nTrill(wald, quentin)\nJapan(wald, quentin)\nnot Japan(wald, hartwell)\nComing(wald)\nBesiege(wald, quentin)\nBesiege(wald, hartwell)\nJapan(hartwell, quentin) -> Trill(hartwell, quentin)\nforall x (Trill(x, quentin) and Besiege(quentin, hartwell) -> Japan(hartwell, quentin))\nforall x (Coming(x) and not Japan(x, quentin) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Trill(x, quentin) and Coming(quentin) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Dovish(x) and Coming(x) -> Japan(x, wald))\nforall x (Coming(x) and not Besiege(x, wald) -> Japan(x, wald))\n\nnot Trill(wald, wald)\n\nnot Trill(wald, wald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The darelle quibble the hercule. The darelle quibble the xenos. The darelle is bicornate. The darelle is flawed. The darelle is unfitting. The darelle contrast the hercule. The hercule quibble the xenos. The hercule recur the xenos. The hercule is not flawed. The hercule does not visit the xenos. The xenos quibble the darelle. The xenos recur the darelle. The xenos does not eat the hercule. The xenos is flawed. The xenos contrast the darelle. The xenos contrast the hercule. If the hercule recur the darelle then the hercule quibble the darelle. If something quibble the darelle and the darelle contrast the hercule then the hercule recur the darelle. If something is flawed and it does not eat the darelle then it is offshore. If something quibble the darelle and the darelle is flawed then it is offshore. If something is offshore and flawed then it recur the xenos. If something is flawed and it does not visit the xenos then it recur the xenos. The hercule is kind.", "logic": "\nQuibble(darelle, hercule)\nQuibble(darelle, xenos)\nBicornate(darelle)\nFlawed(darelle)\nUnfitting(darelle)\nContrast(darelle, hercule)\nQuibble(hercule, xenos)\nRecur(hercule, xenos)\nnot Flawed(hercule)\nnot Contrast(hercule, xenos)\nQuibble(xenos, darelle)\nRecur(xenos, darelle)\nnot Recur(xenos, hercule)\nFlawed(xenos)\nContrast(xenos, darelle)\nContrast(xenos, hercule)\nRecur(hercule, darelle) -> Quibble(hercule, darelle)\nforall x (Quibble(x, darelle) and Contrast(darelle, hercule) -> Recur(hercule, darelle))\nforall x (Flawed(x) and not Recur(x, darelle) -> Offshore(x))\nforall x (Quibble(x, darelle) and Flawed(darelle) -> Offshore(x))\nforall x (Offshore(x) and Flawed(x) -> Recur(x, xenos))\nforall x (Flawed(x) and not Contrast(x, xenos) -> Recur(x, xenos))\n\nKind(hercule)\n\nKind(hercule) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The consuela overhang the meredith. The consuela balance the meredith. The meredith overhang the consuela. The meredith is sulfurous. The meredith is unfrosted. The meredith balance the consuela. The meredith gradate the consuela. If something balance the meredith and it is sulfurous then it balance the consuela. If something overhang the meredith and it gradate the consuela then the consuela gradate the meredith. If the consuela overhang the meredith and the consuela gradate the meredith then the consuela balance the meredith. If something overhang the consuela then it overhang the meredith. If something overhang the consuela then it is awless. If something gradate the consuela and it overhang the meredith then the consuela balance the meredith. If something gradate the meredith and it overhang the meredith then it is awless. If something overhang the consuela then the consuela is sulfurous. The meredith is unfrosted.", "logic": "\nOverhang(consuela, meredith)\nBalance(consuela, meredith)\nOverhang(meredith, consuela)\nSulfurous(meredith)\nUnfrosted(meredith)\nBalance(meredith, consuela)\nGradate(meredith, consuela)\nforall x (Balance(x, meredith) and Sulfurous(x) -> Balance(x, consuela))\nforall x (Overhang(x, meredith) and Gradate(x, consuela) -> Gradate(consuela, meredith))\nOverhang(consuela, meredith) and Gradate(consuela, meredith) -> Balance(consuela, meredith)\nforall x (Overhang(x, consuela) -> Overhang(x, meredith))\nforall x (Overhang(x, consuela) -> Awless(x))\nforall x (Gradate(x, consuela) and Overhang(x, meredith) -> Balance(consuela, meredith))\nforall x (Gradate(x, meredith) and Overhang(x, meredith) -> Awless(x))\nforall x (Overhang(x, consuela) -> Sulfurous(consuela))\n\nUnfrosted(meredith)\n\ntherefore Unfrosted(meredith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The leoine conjecture the persis. The leoine abstain the persis. The persis conjecture the leoine. The persis is obtrusive. The persis is thrillful. The persis abstain the leoine. The persis guttle the leoine. If something abstain the persis and it is obtrusive then it abstain the leoine. If something conjecture the persis and it guttle the leoine then the leoine guttle the persis. If the leoine conjecture the persis and the leoine guttle the persis then the leoine abstain the persis. If something conjecture the leoine then it conjecture the persis. If something conjecture the leoine then it is meshed. If something guttle the leoine and it conjecture the persis then the leoine abstain the persis. If something guttle the persis and it conjecture the persis then it is meshed. If something conjecture the leoine then the leoine is obtrusive. The persis does not see the leoine.", "logic": "\nConjecture(leoine, persis)\nAbstain(leoine, persis)\nConjecture(persis, leoine)\nObtrusive(persis)\nThrillful(persis)\nAbstain(persis, leoine)\nGuttle(persis, leoine)\nforall x (Abstain(x, persis) and Obtrusive(x) -> Abstain(x, leoine))\nforall x (Conjecture(x, persis) and Guttle(x, leoine) -> Guttle(leoine, persis))\nConjecture(leoine, persis) and Guttle(leoine, persis) -> Abstain(leoine, persis)\nforall x (Conjecture(x, leoine) -> Conjecture(x, persis))\nforall x (Conjecture(x, leoine) -> Meshed(x))\nforall x (Guttle(x, leoine) and Conjecture(x, persis) -> Abstain(leoine, persis))\nforall x (Guttle(x, persis) and Conjecture(x, persis) -> Meshed(x))\nforall x (Conjecture(x, leoine) -> Obtrusive(leoine))\n\nnot Guttle(persis, leoine)\n\ntherefore Guttle(persis, leoine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The barri fidget the bishop. The barri hire the bishop. The bishop fidget the barri. The bishop is adonic. The bishop is spiky. The bishop hire the barri. The bishop expel the barri. If something hire the bishop and it is adonic then it hire the barri. If something fidget the bishop and it expel the barri then the barri expel the bishop. If the barri fidget the bishop and the barri expel the bishop then the barri hire the bishop. If something fidget the barri then it fidget the bishop. If something fidget the barri then it is subocular. If something expel the barri and it fidget the bishop then the barri hire the bishop. If something expel the bishop and it fidget the bishop then it is subocular. If something fidget the barri then the barri is adonic. The bishop fidget the bishop.", "logic": "\nFidget(barri, bishop)\nHire(barri, bishop)\nFidget(bishop, barri)\nAdonic(bishop)\nSpiky(bishop)\nHire(bishop, barri)\nExpel(bishop, barri)\nforall x (Hire(x, bishop) and Adonic(x) -> Hire(x, barri))\nforall x (Fidget(x, bishop) and Expel(x, barri) -> Expel(barri, bishop))\nFidget(barri, bishop) and Expel(barri, bishop) -> Hire(barri, bishop)\nforall x (Fidget(x, barri) -> Fidget(x, bishop))\nforall x (Fidget(x, barri) -> Subocular(x))\nforall x (Expel(x, barri) and Fidget(x, bishop) -> Hire(barri, bishop))\nforall x (Expel(x, bishop) and Fidget(x, bishop) -> Subocular(x))\nforall x (Fidget(x, barri) -> Adonic(barri))\n\nFidget(bishop, bishop)\n\nFidget(bishop, barri) and forall x (Fidget(x, barri) -> Fidget(x, bishop)) -> therefore Fidget(bishop, bishop)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The evania becalm the lance. The evania secularise the lance. The lance becalm the evania. The lance is trusting. The lance is skinnerian. The lance secularise the evania. The lance jabber the evania. If something secularise the lance and it is trusting then it secularise the evania. If something becalm the lance and it jabber the evania then the evania jabber the lance. If the evania becalm the lance and the evania jabber the lance then the evania secularise the lance. If something becalm the evania then it becalm the lance. If something becalm the evania then it is rapid. If something jabber the evania and it becalm the lance then the evania secularise the lance. If something jabber the lance and it becalm the lance then it is rapid. If something becalm the evania then the evania is trusting. The lance does not chase the lance.", "logic": "\nBecalm(evania, lance)\nSecularise(evania, lance)\nBecalm(lance, evania)\nTrusting(lance)\nSkinnerian(lance)\nSecularise(lance, evania)\nJabber(lance, evania)\nforall x (Secularise(x, lance) and Trusting(x) -> Secularise(x, evania))\nforall x (Becalm(x, lance) and Jabber(x, evania) -> Jabber(evania, lance))\nBecalm(evania, lance) and Jabber(evania, lance) -> Secularise(evania, lance)\nforall x (Becalm(x, evania) -> Becalm(x, lance))\nforall x (Becalm(x, evania) -> Rapid(x))\nforall x (Jabber(x, evania) and Becalm(x, lance) -> Secularise(evania, lance))\nforall x (Jabber(x, lance) and Becalm(x, lance) -> Rapid(x))\nforall x (Becalm(x, evania) -> Trusting(evania))\n\nnot Becalm(lance, lance)\n\nBecalm(lance, evania) and forall x (Becalm(x, evania) -> Becalm(x, lance)) -> therefore Becalm(lance, lance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The jan acuminate the orelee. The jan utter the orelee. The orelee acuminate the jan. The orelee is mammary. The orelee is foolish. The orelee utter the jan. The orelee freak the jan. If something utter the orelee and it is mammary then it utter the jan. If something acuminate the orelee and it freak the jan then the jan freak the orelee. If the jan acuminate the orelee and the jan freak the orelee then the jan utter the orelee. If something acuminate the jan then it acuminate the orelee. If something acuminate the jan then it is subsonic. If something freak the jan and it acuminate the orelee then the jan utter the orelee. If something freak the orelee and it acuminate the orelee then it is subsonic. If something acuminate the jan then the jan is mammary. The jan utter the jan.", "logic": "\nAcuminate(jan, orelee)\nUtter(jan, orelee)\nAcuminate(orelee, jan)\nMammary(orelee)\nFoolish(orelee)\nUtter(orelee, jan)\nFreak(orelee, jan)\nforall x (Utter(x, orelee) and Mammary(x) -> Utter(x, jan))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, orelee) and Freak(x, jan) -> Freak(jan, orelee))\nAcuminate(jan, orelee) and Freak(jan, orelee) -> Utter(jan, orelee)\nforall x (Acuminate(x, jan) -> Acuminate(x, orelee))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, jan) -> Subsonic(x))\nforall x (Freak(x, jan) and Acuminate(x, orelee) -> Utter(jan, orelee))\nforall x (Freak(x, orelee) and Acuminate(x, orelee) -> Subsonic(x))\nforall x (Acuminate(x, jan) -> Mammary(jan))\n\nUtter(jan, jan)\n\nAcuminate(orelee, jan) and forall x (Acuminate(x, jan) -> Mammary(jan)) -> therefore Mammary(jan) Utter(jan, orelee) and Mammary(jan) and forall x (Utter(x, orelee) and Mammary(x) -> Utter(x, jan)) -> therefore Utter(jan, jan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The robbie baffle the carmela. The robbie untie the carmela. The carmela baffle the robbie. The carmela is auld. The carmela is nonaligned. The carmela untie the robbie. The carmela tend the robbie. If something untie the carmela and it is auld then it untie the robbie. If something baffle the carmela and it tend the robbie then the robbie tend the carmela. If the robbie baffle the carmela and the robbie tend the carmela then the robbie untie the carmela. If something baffle the robbie then it baffle the carmela. If something baffle the robbie then it is balking. If something tend the robbie and it baffle the carmela then the robbie untie the carmela. If something tend the carmela and it baffle the carmela then it is balking. If something baffle the robbie then the robbie is auld. The robbie does not see the carmela.", "logic": "\nBaffle(robbie, carmela)\nUntie(robbie, carmela)\nBaffle(carmela, robbie)\nAuld(carmela)\nNonaligned(carmela)\nUntie(carmela, robbie)\nTend(carmela, robbie)\nforall x (Untie(x, carmela) and Auld(x) -> Untie(x, robbie))\nforall x (Baffle(x, carmela) and Tend(x, robbie) -> Tend(robbie, carmela))\nBaffle(robbie, carmela) and Tend(robbie, carmela) -> Untie(robbie, carmela)\nforall x (Baffle(x, robbie) -> Baffle(x, carmela))\nforall x (Baffle(x, robbie) -> Balking(x))\nforall x (Tend(x, robbie) and Baffle(x, carmela) -> Untie(robbie, carmela))\nforall x (Tend(x, carmela) and Baffle(x, carmela) -> Balking(x))\nforall x (Baffle(x, robbie) -> Auld(robbie))\n\nnot Tend(robbie, carmela)\n\nBaffle(carmela, robbie) and forall x (Baffle(x, robbie) -> Baffle(x, carmela)) -> therefore Baffle(carmela, carmela) Baffle(carmela, carmela) and Tend(carmela, robbie) and forall x (Baffle(x, carmela) and Tend(x, robbie) -> Tend(robbie, carmela)) -> therefore Tend(robbie, carmela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The calvin symmetrise the wilmar. The calvin evince the wilmar. The wilmar symmetrise the calvin. The wilmar is headfirst. The wilmar is syncretic. The wilmar evince the calvin. The wilmar open the calvin. If something evince the wilmar and it is headfirst then it evince the calvin. If something symmetrise the wilmar and it open the calvin then the calvin open the wilmar. If the calvin symmetrise the wilmar and the calvin open the wilmar then the calvin evince the wilmar. If something symmetrise the calvin then it symmetrise the wilmar. If something symmetrise the calvin then it is disordered. If something open the calvin and it symmetrise the wilmar then the calvin evince the wilmar. If something open the wilmar and it symmetrise the wilmar then it is disordered. If something symmetrise the calvin then the calvin is headfirst. The calvin is disordered.", "logic": "\nSymmetrise(calvin, wilmar)\nEvince(calvin, wilmar)\nSymmetrise(wilmar, calvin)\nHeadfirst(wilmar)\nSyncretic(wilmar)\nEvince(wilmar, calvin)\nOpen(wilmar, calvin)\nforall x (Evince(x, wilmar) and Headfirst(x) -> Evince(x, calvin))\nforall x (Symmetrise(x, wilmar) and Open(x, calvin) -> Open(calvin, wilmar))\nSymmetrise(calvin, wilmar) and Open(calvin, wilmar) -> Evince(calvin, wilmar)\nforall x (Symmetrise(x, calvin) -> Symmetrise(x, wilmar))\nforall x (Symmetrise(x, calvin) -> Disordered(x))\nforall x (Open(x, calvin) and Symmetrise(x, wilmar) -> Evince(calvin, wilmar))\nforall x (Open(x, wilmar) and Symmetrise(x, wilmar) -> Disordered(x))\nforall x (Symmetrise(x, calvin) -> Headfirst(calvin))\n\nDisordered(calvin)\n\nSymmetrise(wilmar, calvin) and forall x (Symmetrise(x, calvin) -> Symmetrise(x, wilmar)) -> therefore Symmetrise(wilmar, wilmar) Symmetrise(wilmar, wilmar) and Open(wilmar, calvin) and forall x (Symmetrise(x, wilmar) and Open(x, calvin) -> Open(calvin, wilmar)) -> therefore Open(calvin, wilmar) Open(calvin, wilmar) and Symmetrise(calvin, wilmar) and forall x (Open(x, wilmar) and Symmetrise(x, wilmar) -> Disordered(x)) -> therefore Disordered(calvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The morly spud the marlee. The morly grow the marlee. The marlee spud the morly. The marlee is abstract. The marlee is immovable. The marlee grow the morly. The marlee thrombose the morly. If something grow the marlee and it is abstract then it grow the morly. If something spud the marlee and it thrombose the morly then the morly thrombose the marlee. If the morly spud the marlee and the morly thrombose the marlee then the morly grow the marlee. If something spud the morly then it spud the marlee. If something spud the morly then it is constant. If something thrombose the morly and it spud the marlee then the morly grow the marlee. If something thrombose the marlee and it spud the marlee then it is constant. If something spud the morly then the morly is abstract. The morly is not constant.", "logic": "\nSpud(morly, marlee)\nGrow(morly, marlee)\nSpud(marlee, morly)\nAbstract(marlee)\nImmovable(marlee)\nGrow(marlee, morly)\nThrombose(marlee, morly)\nforall x (Grow(x, marlee) and Abstract(x) -> Grow(x, morly))\nforall x (Spud(x, marlee) and Thrombose(x, morly) -> Thrombose(morly, marlee))\nSpud(morly, marlee) and Thrombose(morly, marlee) -> Grow(morly, marlee)\nforall x (Spud(x, morly) -> Spud(x, marlee))\nforall x (Spud(x, morly) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, morly) and Spud(x, marlee) -> Grow(morly, marlee))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, marlee) and Spud(x, marlee) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Spud(x, morly) -> Abstract(morly))\n\nnot Constant(morly)\n\nSpud(marlee, morly) and forall x (Spud(x, morly) -> Spud(x, marlee)) -> therefore Spud(marlee, marlee) Spud(marlee, marlee) and Thrombose(marlee, morly) and forall x (Spud(x, marlee) and Thrombose(x, morly) -> Thrombose(morly, marlee)) -> therefore Thrombose(morly, marlee) Thrombose(morly, marlee) and Spud(morly, marlee) and forall x (Thrombose(x, marlee) and Spud(x, marlee) -> Constant(x)) -> therefore Constant(morly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The annabella mulct the tisha. The annabella time the tisha. The tisha mulct the annabella. The tisha is clean. The tisha is asterisked. The tisha time the annabella. The tisha sorcerize the annabella. If something time the tisha and it is clean then it time the annabella. If something mulct the tisha and it sorcerize the annabella then the annabella sorcerize the tisha. If the annabella mulct the tisha and the annabella sorcerize the tisha then the annabella time the tisha. If something mulct the annabella then it mulct the tisha. If something mulct the annabella then it is unrequited. If something sorcerize the annabella and it mulct the tisha then the annabella time the tisha. If something sorcerize the tisha and it mulct the tisha then it is unrequited. If something mulct the annabella then the annabella is clean. The tisha is not round.", "logic": "\nMulct(annabella, tisha)\nTime(annabella, tisha)\nMulct(tisha, annabella)\nClean(tisha)\nAsterisked(tisha)\nTime(tisha, annabella)\nSorcerize(tisha, annabella)\nforall x (Time(x, tisha) and Clean(x) -> Time(x, annabella))\nforall x (Mulct(x, tisha) and Sorcerize(x, annabella) -> Sorcerize(annabella, tisha))\nMulct(annabella, tisha) and Sorcerize(annabella, tisha) -> Time(annabella, tisha)\nforall x (Mulct(x, annabella) -> Mulct(x, tisha))\nforall x (Mulct(x, annabella) -> Unrequited(x))\nforall x (Sorcerize(x, annabella) and Mulct(x, tisha) -> Time(annabella, tisha))\nforall x (Sorcerize(x, tisha) and Mulct(x, tisha) -> Unrequited(x))\nforall x (Mulct(x, annabella) -> Clean(annabella))\n\nnot Round(tisha)\n\nnot Round(tisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The jacintha overthrow the daloris. The jacintha debug the daloris. The daloris overthrow the jacintha. The daloris is stylistic. The daloris is fresh. The daloris debug the jacintha. The daloris corn the jacintha. If something debug the daloris and it is stylistic then it debug the jacintha. If something overthrow the daloris and it corn the jacintha then the jacintha corn the daloris. If the jacintha overthrow the daloris and the jacintha corn the daloris then the jacintha debug the daloris. If something overthrow the jacintha then it overthrow the daloris. If something overthrow the jacintha then it is sweeping. If something corn the jacintha and it overthrow the daloris then the jacintha debug the daloris. If something corn the daloris and it overthrow the daloris then it is sweeping. If something overthrow the jacintha then the jacintha is stylistic. The daloris is kind.", "logic": "\nOverthrow(jacintha, daloris)\nDebug(jacintha, daloris)\nOverthrow(daloris, jacintha)\nStylistic(daloris)\nFresh(daloris)\nDebug(daloris, jacintha)\nCorn(daloris, jacintha)\nforall x (Debug(x, daloris) and Stylistic(x) -> Debug(x, jacintha))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, daloris) and Corn(x, jacintha) -> Corn(jacintha, daloris))\nOverthrow(jacintha, daloris) and Corn(jacintha, daloris) -> Debug(jacintha, daloris)\nforall x (Overthrow(x, jacintha) -> Overthrow(x, daloris))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, jacintha) -> Sweeping(x))\nforall x (Corn(x, jacintha) and Overthrow(x, daloris) -> Debug(jacintha, daloris))\nforall x (Corn(x, daloris) and Overthrow(x, daloris) -> Sweeping(x))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, jacintha) -> Stylistic(jacintha))\n\nKind(daloris)\n\nKind(daloris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The charmion measure the gustavus. The charmion teleport the gustavus. The gustavus measure the charmion. The gustavus is abbatial. The gustavus is boffo. The gustavus teleport the charmion. The gustavus dope the charmion. If something teleport the gustavus and it is abbatial then it teleport the charmion. If something measure the gustavus and it dope the charmion then the charmion dope the gustavus. If the charmion measure the gustavus and the charmion dope the gustavus then the charmion teleport the gustavus. If something measure the charmion then it measure the gustavus. If something measure the charmion then it is cathectic. If something dope the charmion and it measure the gustavus then the charmion teleport the gustavus. If something dope the gustavus and it measure the gustavus then it is cathectic. If something measure the charmion then the charmion is abbatial. The charmion is not boffo.", "logic": "\nMeasure(charmion, gustavus)\nTeleport(charmion, gustavus)\nMeasure(gustavus, charmion)\nAbbatial(gustavus)\nBoffo(gustavus)\nTeleport(gustavus, charmion)\nDope(gustavus, charmion)\nforall x (Teleport(x, gustavus) and Abbatial(x) -> Teleport(x, charmion))\nforall x (Measure(x, gustavus) and Dope(x, charmion) -> Dope(charmion, gustavus))\nMeasure(charmion, gustavus) and Dope(charmion, gustavus) -> Teleport(charmion, gustavus)\nforall x (Measure(x, charmion) -> Measure(x, gustavus))\nforall x (Measure(x, charmion) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Dope(x, charmion) and Measure(x, gustavus) -> Teleport(charmion, gustavus))\nforall x (Dope(x, gustavus) and Measure(x, gustavus) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Measure(x, charmion) -> Abbatial(charmion))\n\nnot Boffo(charmion)\n\nnot Boffo(charmion) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The mohan exonerate the jimmy. The mohan pull the jimmy. The jimmy exonerate the mohan. The jimmy is unhallowed. The jimmy is highborn. The jimmy pull the mohan. The jimmy dislocate the mohan. If something pull the jimmy and it is unhallowed then it pull the mohan. If something exonerate the jimmy and it dislocate the mohan then the mohan dislocate the jimmy. If the mohan exonerate the jimmy and the mohan dislocate the jimmy then the mohan pull the jimmy. If something exonerate the mohan then it exonerate the jimmy. If something exonerate the mohan then it is boytrose. If something dislocate the mohan and it exonerate the jimmy then the mohan pull the jimmy. If something dislocate the jimmy and it exonerate the jimmy then it is boytrose. If something exonerate the mohan then the mohan is unhallowed. The mohan is round.", "logic": "\nExonerate(mohan, jimmy)\nPull(mohan, jimmy)\nExonerate(jimmy, mohan)\nUnhallowed(jimmy)\nHighborn(jimmy)\nPull(jimmy, mohan)\nDislocate(jimmy, mohan)\nforall x (Pull(x, jimmy) and Unhallowed(x) -> Pull(x, mohan))\nforall x (Exonerate(x, jimmy) and Dislocate(x, mohan) -> Dislocate(mohan, jimmy))\nExonerate(mohan, jimmy) and Dislocate(mohan, jimmy) -> Pull(mohan, jimmy)\nforall x (Exonerate(x, mohan) -> Exonerate(x, jimmy))\nforall x (Exonerate(x, mohan) -> Boytrose(x))\nforall x (Dislocate(x, mohan) and Exonerate(x, jimmy) -> Pull(mohan, jimmy))\nforall x (Dislocate(x, jimmy) and Exonerate(x, jimmy) -> Boytrose(x))\nforall x (Exonerate(x, mohan) -> Unhallowed(mohan))\n\nRound(mohan)\n\nRound(mohan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The katine separate the gunther. The katine enslave the gunther. The gunther separate the katine. The gunther is unbowed. The gunther is anachronic. The gunther enslave the katine. The gunther manipulate the katine. If something enslave the gunther and it is unbowed then it enslave the katine. If something separate the gunther and it manipulate the katine then the katine manipulate the gunther. If the katine separate the gunther and the katine manipulate the gunther then the katine enslave the gunther. If something separate the katine then it separate the gunther. If something separate the katine then it is petrifying. If something manipulate the katine and it separate the gunther then the katine enslave the gunther. If something manipulate the gunther and it separate the gunther then it is petrifying. If something separate the katine then the katine is unbowed. The gunther does not see the gunther.", "logic": "\nSeparate(katine, gunther)\nEnslave(katine, gunther)\nSeparate(gunther, katine)\nUnbowed(gunther)\nAnachronic(gunther)\nEnslave(gunther, katine)\nManipulate(gunther, katine)\nforall x (Enslave(x, gunther) and Unbowed(x) -> Enslave(x, katine))\nforall x (Separate(x, gunther) and Manipulate(x, katine) -> Manipulate(katine, gunther))\nSeparate(katine, gunther) and Manipulate(katine, gunther) -> Enslave(katine, gunther)\nforall x (Separate(x, katine) -> Separate(x, gunther))\nforall x (Separate(x, katine) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Manipulate(x, katine) and Separate(x, gunther) -> Enslave(katine, gunther))\nforall x (Manipulate(x, gunther) and Separate(x, gunther) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Separate(x, katine) -> Unbowed(katine))\n\nnot Manipulate(gunther, gunther)\n\nnot Manipulate(gunther, gunther) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The davidde deactivate the michale. The davidde homer the michale. The michale deactivate the davidde. The michale is unneeded. The michale is cusped. The michale homer the davidde. The michale reappraise the davidde. If something homer the michale and it is unneeded then it homer the davidde. If something deactivate the michale and it reappraise the davidde then the davidde reappraise the michale. If the davidde deactivate the michale and the davidde reappraise the michale then the davidde homer the michale. If something deactivate the davidde then it deactivate the michale. If something deactivate the davidde then it is cleansing. If something reappraise the davidde and it deactivate the michale then the davidde homer the michale. If something reappraise the michale and it deactivate the michale then it is cleansing. If something deactivate the davidde then the davidde is unneeded. The davidde deactivate the davidde.", "logic": "\nDeactivate(davidde, michale)\nHomer(davidde, michale)\nDeactivate(michale, davidde)\nUnneeded(michale)\nCusped(michale)\nHomer(michale, davidde)\nReappraise(michale, davidde)\nforall x (Homer(x, michale) and Unneeded(x) -> Homer(x, davidde))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, michale) and Reappraise(x, davidde) -> Reappraise(davidde, michale))\nDeactivate(davidde, michale) and Reappraise(davidde, michale) -> Homer(davidde, michale)\nforall x (Deactivate(x, davidde) -> Deactivate(x, michale))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, davidde) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, davidde) and Deactivate(x, michale) -> Homer(davidde, michale))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, michale) and Deactivate(x, michale) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, davidde) -> Unneeded(davidde))\n\nDeactivate(davidde, davidde)\n\nDeactivate(davidde, davidde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The lotte pronounce the sophronia. The lotte butt the sophronia. The sophronia pronounce the lotte. The sophronia is restful. The sophronia is detested. The sophronia butt the lotte. The sophronia subtilize the lotte. If something butt the sophronia and it is restful then it butt the lotte. If something pronounce the sophronia and it subtilize the lotte then the lotte subtilize the sophronia. If the lotte pronounce the sophronia and the lotte subtilize the sophronia then the lotte butt the sophronia. If something pronounce the lotte then it pronounce the sophronia. If something pronounce the lotte then it is dependent. If something subtilize the lotte and it pronounce the sophronia then the lotte butt the sophronia. If something subtilize the sophronia and it pronounce the sophronia then it is dependent. If something pronounce the lotte then the lotte is restful. The sophronia does not like the sophronia.", "logic": "\nPronounce(lotte, sophronia)\nButt(lotte, sophronia)\nPronounce(sophronia, lotte)\nRestful(sophronia)\nDetested(sophronia)\nButt(sophronia, lotte)\nSubtilize(sophronia, lotte)\nforall x (Butt(x, sophronia) and Restful(x) -> Butt(x, lotte))\nforall x (Pronounce(x, sophronia) and Subtilize(x, lotte) -> Subtilize(lotte, sophronia))\nPronounce(lotte, sophronia) and Subtilize(lotte, sophronia) -> Butt(lotte, sophronia)\nforall x (Pronounce(x, lotte) -> Pronounce(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Pronounce(x, lotte) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, lotte) and Pronounce(x, sophronia) -> Butt(lotte, sophronia))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, sophronia) and Pronounce(x, sophronia) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Pronounce(x, lotte) -> Restful(lotte))\n\nnot Butt(sophronia, sophronia)\n\nnot Butt(sophronia, sophronia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The iona outvie the aurlie. The iona rape the aurlie. The aurlie outvie the iona. The aurlie is gonadal. The aurlie is avoidable. The aurlie rape the iona. The aurlie dwarf the iona. If something rape the aurlie and it is gonadal then it rape the iona. If something outvie the aurlie and it dwarf the iona then the iona dwarf the aurlie. If the iona outvie the aurlie and the iona dwarf the aurlie then the iona rape the aurlie. If something outvie the iona then it outvie the aurlie. If something outvie the iona then it is obsequious. If something dwarf the iona and it outvie the aurlie then the iona rape the aurlie. If something dwarf the aurlie and it outvie the aurlie then it is obsequious. If something outvie the iona then the iona is gonadal. The iona is kind.", "logic": "\nOutvie(iona, aurlie)\nRape(iona, aurlie)\nOutvie(aurlie, iona)\nGonadal(aurlie)\nAvoidable(aurlie)\nRape(aurlie, iona)\nDwarf(aurlie, iona)\nforall x (Rape(x, aurlie) and Gonadal(x) -> Rape(x, iona))\nforall x (Outvie(x, aurlie) and Dwarf(x, iona) -> Dwarf(iona, aurlie))\nOutvie(iona, aurlie) and Dwarf(iona, aurlie) -> Rape(iona, aurlie)\nforall x (Outvie(x, iona) -> Outvie(x, aurlie))\nforall x (Outvie(x, iona) -> Obsequious(x))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, iona) and Outvie(x, aurlie) -> Rape(iona, aurlie))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, aurlie) and Outvie(x, aurlie) -> Obsequious(x))\nforall x (Outvie(x, iona) -> Gonadal(iona))\n\nKind(iona)\n\nKind(iona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Luther is straggly. Luther is divisive. Luther is bipedal. Joao is straggly. Joao is blusterous. Joao is divisive. Joao is nursed. Joao is fallacious. Joao is bipedal. Joao is vestibular. All bipedal things are divisive. All divisive things are blusterous. If Luther is vestibular and Luther is fallacious then Luther is blusterous. All straggly things are divisive. Young things are fallacious. If something is bipedal and blusterous then it is vestibular. If something is bipedal and vestibular then it is fallacious. Nice things are straggly. Luther is divisive.", "logic": "\nStraggly(luther)\nDivisive(luther)\nBipedal(luther)\nStraggly(joao)\nBlusterous(joao)\nDivisive(joao)\nNursed(joao)\nFallacious(joao)\nBipedal(joao)\nVestibular(joao)\nforall x (Bipedal(x) -> Divisive(x))\nforall x (Divisive(x) -> Blusterous(x))\nVestibular(luther) and Fallacious(luther) -> Blusterous(luther)\nforall x (Straggly(x) -> Divisive(x))\nforall x (Vestibular(x) -> Fallacious(x))\nforall x (Bipedal(x) and Blusterous(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Bipedal(x) and Vestibular(x) -> Fallacious(x))\nforall x (Divisive(x) -> Straggly(x))\n\nDivisive(luther)\n\ntherefore Divisive(luther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Cordey is shattering. Cordey is fathomable. Cordey is incorrect. Leia is shattering. Leia is starchless. Leia is fathomable. Leia is incursive. Leia is thirty. Leia is incorrect. Leia is abeyant. All incorrect things are fathomable. All fathomable things are starchless. If Cordey is abeyant and Cordey is thirty then Cordey is starchless. All shattering things are fathomable. Young things are thirty. If something is incorrect and starchless then it is abeyant. If something is incorrect and abeyant then it is thirty. Nice things are shattering. Cordey is not shattering.", "logic": "\nShattering(cordey)\nFathomable(cordey)\nIncorrect(cordey)\nShattering(leia)\nStarchless(leia)\nFathomable(leia)\nIncursive(leia)\nThirty(leia)\nIncorrect(leia)\nAbeyant(leia)\nforall x (Incorrect(x) -> Fathomable(x))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Starchless(x))\nAbeyant(cordey) and Thirty(cordey) -> Starchless(cordey)\nforall x (Shattering(x) -> Fathomable(x))\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Thirty(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and Starchless(x) -> Abeyant(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and Abeyant(x) -> Thirty(x))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Shattering(x))\n\nnot Shattering(cordey)\n\ntherefore Shattering(cordey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Belita is ionised. Belita is accustomed. Belita is ceilinged. Martina is ionised. Martina is revenant. Martina is accustomed. Martina is chthonic. Martina is bilingual. Martina is ceilinged. Martina is synoptic. All ceilinged things are accustomed. All accustomed things are revenant. If Belita is synoptic and Belita is bilingual then Belita is revenant. All ionised things are accustomed. Young things are bilingual. If something is ceilinged and revenant then it is synoptic. If something is ceilinged and synoptic then it is bilingual. Nice things are ionised. Belita is revenant.", "logic": "\nIonised(belita)\nAccustomed(belita)\nCeilinged(belita)\nIonised(martina)\nRevenant(martina)\nAccustomed(martina)\nChthonic(martina)\nBilingual(martina)\nCeilinged(martina)\nSynoptic(martina)\nforall x (Ceilinged(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Revenant(x))\nSynoptic(belita) and Bilingual(belita) -> Revenant(belita)\nforall x (Ionised(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nforall x (Ceilinged(x) and Revenant(x) -> Synoptic(x))\nforall x (Ceilinged(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Ionised(x))\n\nRevenant(belita)\n\nAccustomed(belita) and forall x (Accustomed(x) -> Revenant(x)) -> therefore Revenant(belita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Sharon is fortunate. Sharon is advanced. Sharon is gushy. Tiertza is fortunate. Tiertza is tops. Tiertza is advanced. Tiertza is venous. Tiertza is effulgent. Tiertza is gushy. Tiertza is tramontane. All gushy things are advanced. All advanced things are tops. If Sharon is tramontane and Sharon is effulgent then Sharon is tops. All fortunate things are advanced. Young things are effulgent. If something is gushy and tops then it is tramontane. If something is gushy and tramontane then it is effulgent. Nice things are fortunate. Sharon is not tops.", "logic": "\nFortunate(sharon)\nAdvanced(sharon)\nGushy(sharon)\nFortunate(tiertza)\nTops(tiertza)\nAdvanced(tiertza)\nVenous(tiertza)\nEffulgent(tiertza)\nGushy(tiertza)\nTramontane(tiertza)\nforall x (Gushy(x) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Tops(x))\nTramontane(sharon) and Effulgent(sharon) -> Tops(sharon)\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) and Tops(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) and Tramontane(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Fortunate(x))\n\nnot Tops(sharon)\n\nAdvanced(sharon) and forall x (Advanced(x) -> Tops(x)) -> therefore Tops(sharon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Britani is actuarial. Britani is fungoid. Britani is feminist. Yevette is actuarial. Yevette is bailable. Yevette is fungoid. Yevette is cordiform. Yevette is iambic. Yevette is feminist. Yevette is infamous. All feminist things are fungoid. All fungoid things are bailable. If Britani is infamous and Britani is iambic then Britani is bailable. All actuarial things are fungoid. Young things are iambic. If something is feminist and bailable then it is infamous. If something is feminist and infamous then it is iambic. Nice things are actuarial. Britani is infamous.", "logic": "\nActuarial(britani)\nFungoid(britani)\nFeminist(britani)\nActuarial(yevette)\nBailable(yevette)\nFungoid(yevette)\nCordiform(yevette)\nIambic(yevette)\nFeminist(yevette)\nInfamous(yevette)\nforall x (Feminist(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) -> Bailable(x))\nInfamous(britani) and Iambic(britani) -> Bailable(britani)\nforall x (Actuarial(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Infamous(x) -> Iambic(x))\nforall x (Feminist(x) and Bailable(x) -> Infamous(x))\nforall x (Feminist(x) and Infamous(x) -> Iambic(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) -> Actuarial(x))\n\nInfamous(britani)\n\nFungoid(britani) and forall x (Fungoid(x) -> Bailable(x)) -> therefore Bailable(britani) Feminist(britani) and Bailable(britani) and forall x (Feminist(x) and Bailable(x) -> Infamous(x)) -> therefore Infamous(britani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Franny is forbearing. Franny is incurious. Franny is respected. Dela is forbearing. Dela is paediatric. Dela is incurious. Dela is major. Dela is fossilized. Dela is respected. Dela is autocratic. All respected things are incurious. All incurious things are paediatric. If Franny is autocratic and Franny is fossilized then Franny is paediatric. All forbearing things are incurious. Young things are fossilized. If something is respected and paediatric then it is autocratic. If something is respected and autocratic then it is fossilized. Nice things are forbearing. Franny is not autocratic.", "logic": "\nForbearing(franny)\nIncurious(franny)\nRespected(franny)\nForbearing(dela)\nPaediatric(dela)\nIncurious(dela)\nMajor(dela)\nFossilized(dela)\nRespected(dela)\nAutocratic(dela)\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Paediatric(x))\nAutocratic(franny) and Fossilized(franny) -> Paediatric(franny)\nforall x (Forbearing(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> Fossilized(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) and Paediatric(x) -> Autocratic(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) and Autocratic(x) -> Fossilized(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Forbearing(x))\n\nnot Autocratic(franny)\n\nIncurious(franny) and forall x (Incurious(x) -> Paediatric(x)) -> therefore Paediatric(franny) Respected(franny) and Paediatric(franny) and forall x (Respected(x) and Paediatric(x) -> Autocratic(x)) -> therefore Autocratic(franny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Marthena is cacogenic. Marthena is solidified. Marthena is supersonic. Gabriella is cacogenic. Gabriella is some. Gabriella is solidified. Gabriella is wifelike. Gabriella is reverend. Gabriella is supersonic. Gabriella is uneducated. All supersonic things are solidified. All solidified things are some. If Marthena is uneducated and Marthena is reverend then Marthena is some. All cacogenic things are solidified. Young things are reverend. If something is supersonic and some then it is uneducated. If something is supersonic and uneducated then it is reverend. Nice things are cacogenic. Marthena is reverend.", "logic": "\nCacogenic(marthena)\nSolidified(marthena)\nSupersonic(marthena)\nCacogenic(gabriella)\nSome(gabriella)\nSolidified(gabriella)\nWifelike(gabriella)\nReverend(gabriella)\nSupersonic(gabriella)\nUneducated(gabriella)\nforall x (Supersonic(x) -> Solidified(x))\nforall x (Solidified(x) -> Some(x))\nUneducated(marthena) and Reverend(marthena) -> Some(marthena)\nforall x (Cacogenic(x) -> Solidified(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Supersonic(x) and Some(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Supersonic(x) and Uneducated(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Solidified(x) -> Cacogenic(x))\n\nReverend(marthena)\n\nSolidified(marthena) and forall x (Solidified(x) -> Some(x)) -> therefore Some(marthena) Supersonic(marthena) and Some(marthena) and forall x (Supersonic(x) and Some(x) -> Uneducated(x)) -> therefore Uneducated(marthena) Uneducated(marthena) and forall x (Uneducated(x) -> Reverend(x)) -> therefore Reverend(marthena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Avery is eidetic. Avery is offensive. Avery is nonexempt. Katine is eidetic. Katine is empyreal. Katine is offensive. Katine is dickensian. Katine is clangorous. Katine is nonexempt. Katine is buffoonish. All nonexempt things are offensive. All offensive things are empyreal. If Avery is buffoonish and Avery is clangorous then Avery is empyreal. All eidetic things are offensive. Young things are clangorous. If something is nonexempt and empyreal then it is buffoonish. If something is nonexempt and buffoonish then it is clangorous. Nice things are eidetic. Avery is not clangorous.", "logic": "\nEidetic(avery)\nOffensive(avery)\nNonexempt(avery)\nEidetic(katine)\nEmpyreal(katine)\nOffensive(katine)\nDickensian(katine)\nClangorous(katine)\nNonexempt(katine)\nBuffoonish(katine)\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Empyreal(x))\nBuffoonish(avery) and Clangorous(avery) -> Empyreal(avery)\nforall x (Eidetic(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Buffoonish(x) -> Clangorous(x))\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) and Empyreal(x) -> Buffoonish(x))\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) and Buffoonish(x) -> Clangorous(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Eidetic(x))\n\nnot Clangorous(avery)\n\nOffensive(avery) and forall x (Offensive(x) -> Empyreal(x)) -> therefore Empyreal(avery) Nonexempt(avery) and Empyreal(avery) and forall x (Nonexempt(x) and Empyreal(x) -> Buffoonish(x)) -> therefore Buffoonish(avery) Buffoonish(avery) and forall x (Buffoonish(x) -> Clangorous(x)) -> therefore Clangorous(avery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Eleanore is nigerian. Eleanore is lambent. Eleanore is not energetic. If someone is nigerian then they are not ravaging. All ravaging people are not platonic. If Eleanore is ravaging then Eleanore is not bryophytic. If Eleanore is not ravaging then Eleanore is platonic. All platonic people are not bryophytic. If someone is platonic then they are not bryophytic. Eleanore is not energetic.", "logic": "\nNigerian(eleanore)\nLambent(eleanore)\nnot Energetic(eleanore)\nforall x (Nigerian(x) -> not Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> not Platonic(x))\nRavaging(eleanore) -> not Bryophytic(eleanore)\nnot Ravaging(eleanore) -> Platonic(eleanore)\nforall x (Platonic(x) -> not Bryophytic(x))\nforall x (Platonic(x) -> not Bryophytic(x))\n\nnot Energetic(eleanore)\n\ntherefore not Energetic(eleanore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Sasha is fatalistic. Sasha is numinous. Sasha is not foamy. If someone is fatalistic then they are not brattish. All brattish people are not hardbacked. If Sasha is brattish then Sasha is not axonal. If Sasha is not brattish then Sasha is hardbacked. All hardbacked people are not axonal. If someone is hardbacked then they are not axonal. Sasha is not fatalistic.", "logic": "\nFatalistic(sasha)\nNuminous(sasha)\nnot Foamy(sasha)\nforall x (Fatalistic(x) -> not Brattish(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> not Hardbacked(x))\nBrattish(sasha) -> not Axonal(sasha)\nnot Brattish(sasha) -> Hardbacked(sasha)\nforall x (Hardbacked(x) -> not Axonal(x))\nforall x (Hardbacked(x) -> not Axonal(x))\n\nnot Fatalistic(sasha)\n\ntherefore Fatalistic(sasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Celestyna is preventive. Celestyna is melodious. Celestyna is not cuprous. If someone is preventive then they are not gratified. All gratified people are not riddled. If Celestyna is gratified then Celestyna is not thunderous. If Celestyna is not gratified then Celestyna is riddled. All riddled people are not thunderous. If someone is riddled then they are not thunderous. Celestyna is not gratified.", "logic": "\nPreventive(celestyna)\nMelodious(celestyna)\nnot Cuprous(celestyna)\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> not Gratified(x))\nforall x (Gratified(x) -> not Riddled(x))\nGratified(celestyna) -> not Thunderous(celestyna)\nnot Gratified(celestyna) -> Riddled(celestyna)\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> not Thunderous(x))\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> not Thunderous(x))\n\nnot Gratified(celestyna)\n\nPreventive(celestyna) and forall x (Preventive(x) -> not Gratified(x)) -> therefore not Gratified(celestyna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Doreen is over. Doreen is uninjured. Doreen is not wonted. If someone is over then they are not naif. All naif people are not inclement. If Doreen is naif then Doreen is not unwritten. If Doreen is not naif then Doreen is inclement. All inclement people are not unwritten. If someone is inclement then they are not unwritten. Doreen is naif.", "logic": "\nOver(doreen)\nUninjured(doreen)\nnot Wonted(doreen)\nforall x (Over(x) -> not Naif(x))\nforall x (Naif(x) -> not Inclement(x))\nNaif(doreen) -> not Unwritten(doreen)\nnot Naif(doreen) -> Inclement(doreen)\nforall x (Inclement(x) -> not Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Inclement(x) -> not Unwritten(x))\n\nNaif(doreen)\n\nOver(doreen) and forall x (Over(x) -> not Naif(x)) -> therefore not Naif(doreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Winni is slaphappy. Winni is writhen. Winni is not belittled. If someone is slaphappy then they are not unmatched. All unmatched people are not permanent. If Winni is unmatched then Winni is not dreamless. If Winni is not unmatched then Winni is permanent. All permanent people are not dreamless. If someone is permanent then they are not dreamless. Winni is permanent.", "logic": "\nSlaphappy(winni)\nWrithen(winni)\nnot Belittled(winni)\nforall x (Slaphappy(x) -> not Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) -> not Permanent(x))\nUnmatched(winni) -> not Dreamless(winni)\nnot Unmatched(winni) -> Permanent(winni)\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> not Dreamless(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> not Dreamless(x))\n\nPermanent(winni)\n\nSlaphappy(winni) and forall x (Slaphappy(x) -> not Unmatched(x)) -> therefore not Unmatched(winni) not Unmatched(winni) and not Unmatched(winni) -> Permanent(winni) -> therefore Permanent(winni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Hew is untenanted. Hew is analyzed. Hew is not wizard. If someone is untenanted then they are not monastical. All monastical people are not coordinate. If Hew is monastical then Hew is not spruce. If Hew is not monastical then Hew is coordinate. All coordinate people are not spruce. If someone is coordinate then they are not spruce. Hew is not coordinate.", "logic": "\nUntenanted(hew)\nAnalyzed(hew)\nnot Wizard(hew)\nforall x (Untenanted(x) -> not Monastical(x))\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> not Coordinate(x))\nMonastical(hew) -> not Spruce(hew)\nnot Monastical(hew) -> Coordinate(hew)\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> not Spruce(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> not Spruce(x))\n\nnot Coordinate(hew)\n\nUntenanted(hew) and forall x (Untenanted(x) -> not Monastical(x)) -> therefore not Monastical(hew) not Monastical(hew) and not Monastical(hew) -> Coordinate(hew) -> therefore Coordinate(hew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Klaus is epideictic. Klaus is perineal. Klaus is not unironed. If someone is epideictic then they are not animal. All animal people are not rooted. If Klaus is animal then Klaus is not duncical. If Klaus is not animal then Klaus is rooted. All rooted people are not duncical. If someone is rooted then they are not duncical. Klaus is not duncical.", "logic": "\nEpideictic(klaus)\nPerineal(klaus)\nnot Unironed(klaus)\nforall x (Epideictic(x) -> not Animal(x))\nforall x (Animal(x) -> not Rooted(x))\nAnimal(klaus) -> not Duncical(klaus)\nnot Animal(klaus) -> Rooted(klaus)\nforall x (Rooted(x) -> not Duncical(x))\nforall x (Rooted(x) -> not Duncical(x))\n\nnot Duncical(klaus)\n\nEpideictic(klaus) and forall x (Epideictic(x) -> not Animal(x)) -> therefore not Animal(klaus) not Animal(klaus) and not Animal(klaus) -> Rooted(klaus) -> therefore Rooted(klaus) Rooted(klaus) and forall x (Rooted(x) -> not Duncical(x)) -> therefore not Duncical(klaus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Victoria is rarified. Victoria is newtonian. Victoria is not outfitted. If someone is rarified then they are not missed. All missed people are not epistolary. If Victoria is missed then Victoria is not spacey. If Victoria is not missed then Victoria is epistolary. All epistolary people are not spacey. If someone is epistolary then they are not spacey. Victoria is spacey.", "logic": "\nRarified(victoria)\nNewtonian(victoria)\nnot Outfitted(victoria)\nforall x (Rarified(x) -> not Missed(x))\nforall x (Missed(x) -> not Epistolary(x))\nMissed(victoria) -> not Spacey(victoria)\nnot Missed(victoria) -> Epistolary(victoria)\nforall x (Epistolary(x) -> not Spacey(x))\nforall x (Epistolary(x) -> not Spacey(x))\n\nSpacey(victoria)\n\nRarified(victoria) and forall x (Rarified(x) -> not Missed(x)) -> therefore not Missed(victoria) not Missed(victoria) and not Missed(victoria) -> Epistolary(victoria) -> therefore Epistolary(victoria) Epistolary(victoria) and forall x (Epistolary(x) -> not Spacey(x)) -> therefore not Spacey(victoria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The maryjane fail the dagmar. The dagmar fail the maryjane. The dagmar is vented. The dagmar spay the maryjane. The rosetta is clathrate. The rosetta crosscut the dagmar. The rosetta spay the maryjane. If something fail the dagmar then the dagmar does not visit the rosetta. If something crosscut the maryjane then the maryjane is not slithery. If the dagmar spay the rosetta and the dagmar is not clathrate then the dagmar fail the maryjane. If something spay the maryjane then it is slithery. If something is slithery then it crosscut the maryjane. If something is slithery then it crosscut the maryjane. If something is vented and it does not like the maryjane then it fail the maryjane. If something fail the maryjane and it crosscut the rosetta then it fail the rosetta. The dagmar spay the maryjane.", "logic": "\nFail(maryjane, dagmar)\nFail(dagmar, maryjane)\nVented(dagmar)\nSpay(dagmar, maryjane)\nClathrate(rosetta)\nCrosscut(rosetta, dagmar)\nSpay(rosetta, maryjane)\nforall x (Fail(x, dagmar) -> not Spay(dagmar, rosetta))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, maryjane) -> not Slithery(maryjane))\nSpay(dagmar, rosetta) and not Clathrate(dagmar) -> Fail(dagmar, maryjane)\nforall x (Spay(x, maryjane) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Slithery(x) -> Crosscut(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Slithery(x) -> Crosscut(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Vented(x) and not Crosscut(x, maryjane) -> Fail(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Fail(x, maryjane) and Crosscut(x, rosetta) -> Fail(x, rosetta))\n\nSpay(dagmar, maryjane)\n\ntherefore Spay(dagmar, maryjane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The valene financier the angelle. The angelle financier the valene. The angelle is tenth. The angelle apologize the valene. The kia is oleophilic. The kia grunt the angelle. The kia apologize the valene. If something financier the angelle then the angelle does not visit the kia. If something grunt the valene then the valene is not buxom. If the angelle apologize the kia and the angelle is not oleophilic then the angelle financier the valene. If something apologize the valene then it is buxom. If something is buxom then it grunt the valene. If something is buxom then it grunt the valene. If something is tenth and it does not like the valene then it financier the valene. If something financier the valene and it grunt the kia then it financier the kia. The angelle does not chase the valene.", "logic": "\nFinancier(valene, angelle)\nFinancier(angelle, valene)\nTenth(angelle)\nApologize(angelle, valene)\nOleophilic(kia)\nGrunt(kia, angelle)\nApologize(kia, valene)\nforall x (Financier(x, angelle) -> not Apologize(angelle, kia))\nforall x (Grunt(x, valene) -> not Buxom(valene))\nApologize(angelle, kia) and not Oleophilic(angelle) -> Financier(angelle, valene)\nforall x (Apologize(x, valene) -> Buxom(x))\nforall x (Buxom(x) -> Grunt(x, valene))\nforall x (Buxom(x) -> Grunt(x, valene))\nforall x (Tenth(x) and not Grunt(x, valene) -> Financier(x, valene))\nforall x (Financier(x, valene) and Grunt(x, kia) -> Financier(x, kia))\n\nnot Financier(angelle, valene)\n\ntherefore Financier(angelle, valene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The maya feminise the kriste. The kriste feminise the maya. The kriste is monstrous. The kriste mitigate the maya. The baxter is appealing. The baxter smoulder the kriste. The baxter mitigate the maya. If something feminise the kriste then the kriste does not visit the baxter. If something smoulder the maya then the maya is not baffling. If the kriste mitigate the baxter and the kriste is not appealing then the kriste feminise the maya. If something mitigate the maya then it is baffling. If something is baffling then it smoulder the maya. If something is baffling then it smoulder the maya. If something is monstrous and it does not like the maya then it feminise the maya. If something feminise the maya and it smoulder the baxter then it feminise the baxter. The baxter is baffling.", "logic": "\nFeminise(maya, kriste)\nFeminise(kriste, maya)\nMonstrous(kriste)\nMitigate(kriste, maya)\nAppealing(baxter)\nSmoulder(baxter, kriste)\nMitigate(baxter, maya)\nforall x (Feminise(x, kriste) -> not Mitigate(kriste, baxter))\nforall x (Smoulder(x, maya) -> not Baffling(maya))\nMitigate(kriste, baxter) and not Appealing(kriste) -> Feminise(kriste, maya)\nforall x (Mitigate(x, maya) -> Baffling(x))\nforall x (Baffling(x) -> Smoulder(x, maya))\nforall x (Baffling(x) -> Smoulder(x, maya))\nforall x (Monstrous(x) and not Smoulder(x, maya) -> Feminise(x, maya))\nforall x (Feminise(x, maya) and Smoulder(x, baxter) -> Feminise(x, baxter))\n\nBaffling(baxter)\n\nMitigate(baxter, maya) and forall x (Mitigate(x, maya) -> Baffling(x)) -> therefore Baffling(baxter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The fionna empanel the babette. The babette empanel the fionna. The babette is betrothed. The babette dislodge the fionna. The ellissa is protrusile. The ellissa affiance the babette. The ellissa dislodge the fionna. If something empanel the babette then the babette does not visit the ellissa. If something affiance the fionna then the fionna is not sprawly. If the babette dislodge the ellissa and the babette is not protrusile then the babette empanel the fionna. If something dislodge the fionna then it is sprawly. If something is sprawly then it affiance the fionna. If something is sprawly then it affiance the fionna. If something is betrothed and it does not like the fionna then it empanel the fionna. If something empanel the fionna and it affiance the ellissa then it empanel the ellissa. The ellissa is not sprawly.", "logic": "\nEmpanel(fionna, babette)\nEmpanel(babette, fionna)\nBetrothed(babette)\nDislodge(babette, fionna)\nProtrusile(ellissa)\nAffiance(ellissa, babette)\nDislodge(ellissa, fionna)\nforall x (Empanel(x, babette) -> not Dislodge(babette, ellissa))\nforall x (Affiance(x, fionna) -> not Sprawly(fionna))\nDislodge(babette, ellissa) and not Protrusile(babette) -> Empanel(babette, fionna)\nforall x (Dislodge(x, fionna) -> Sprawly(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) -> Affiance(x, fionna))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) -> Affiance(x, fionna))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and not Affiance(x, fionna) -> Empanel(x, fionna))\nforall x (Empanel(x, fionna) and Affiance(x, ellissa) -> Empanel(x, ellissa))\n\nnot Sprawly(ellissa)\n\nDislodge(ellissa, fionna) and forall x (Dislodge(x, fionna) -> Sprawly(x)) -> therefore Sprawly(ellissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The ave bellylaugh the adams. The adams bellylaugh the ave. The adams is fimbriate. The adams cuff the ave. The bendite is rumanian. The bendite protect the adams. The bendite cuff the ave. If something bellylaugh the adams then the adams does not visit the bendite. If something protect the ave then the ave is not publicized. If the adams cuff the bendite and the adams is not rumanian then the adams bellylaugh the ave. If something cuff the ave then it is publicized. If something is publicized then it protect the ave. If something is publicized then it protect the ave. If something is fimbriate and it does not like the ave then it bellylaugh the ave. If something bellylaugh the ave and it protect the bendite then it bellylaugh the bendite. The bendite protect the ave.", "logic": "\nBellylaugh(ave, adams)\nBellylaugh(adams, ave)\nFimbriate(adams)\nCuff(adams, ave)\nRumanian(bendite)\nProtect(bendite, adams)\nCuff(bendite, ave)\nforall x (Bellylaugh(x, adams) -> not Cuff(adams, bendite))\nforall x (Protect(x, ave) -> not Publicized(ave))\nCuff(adams, bendite) and not Rumanian(adams) -> Bellylaugh(adams, ave)\nforall x (Cuff(x, ave) -> Publicized(x))\nforall x (Publicized(x) -> Protect(x, ave))\nforall x (Publicized(x) -> Protect(x, ave))\nforall x (Fimbriate(x) and not Protect(x, ave) -> Bellylaugh(x, ave))\nforall x (Bellylaugh(x, ave) and Protect(x, bendite) -> Bellylaugh(x, bendite))\n\nProtect(bendite, ave)\n\nCuff(bendite, ave) and forall x (Cuff(x, ave) -> Publicized(x)) -> therefore Publicized(bendite) Publicized(bendite) and forall x (Publicized(x) -> Protect(x, ave)) -> therefore Protect(bendite, ave)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The barry bayonet the storm. The storm bayonet the barry. The storm is credal. The storm sizzle the barry. The shepperd is postmortem. The shepperd decrypt the storm. The shepperd sizzle the barry. If something bayonet the storm then the storm does not visit the shepperd. If something decrypt the barry then the barry is not laputan. If the storm sizzle the shepperd and the storm is not postmortem then the storm bayonet the barry. If something sizzle the barry then it is laputan. If something is laputan then it decrypt the barry. If something is laputan then it decrypt the barry. If something is credal and it does not like the barry then it bayonet the barry. If something bayonet the barry and it decrypt the shepperd then it bayonet the shepperd. The storm does not like the barry.", "logic": "\nBayonet(barry, storm)\nBayonet(storm, barry)\nCredal(storm)\nSizzle(storm, barry)\nPostmortem(shepperd)\nDecrypt(shepperd, storm)\nSizzle(shepperd, barry)\nforall x (Bayonet(x, storm) -> not Sizzle(storm, shepperd))\nforall x (Decrypt(x, barry) -> not Laputan(barry))\nSizzle(storm, shepperd) and not Postmortem(storm) -> Bayonet(storm, barry)\nforall x (Sizzle(x, barry) -> Laputan(x))\nforall x (Laputan(x) -> Decrypt(x, barry))\nforall x (Laputan(x) -> Decrypt(x, barry))\nforall x (Credal(x) and not Decrypt(x, barry) -> Bayonet(x, barry))\nforall x (Bayonet(x, barry) and Decrypt(x, shepperd) -> Bayonet(x, shepperd))\n\nnot Decrypt(storm, barry)\n\nSizzle(storm, barry) and forall x (Sizzle(x, barry) -> Laputan(x)) -> therefore Laputan(storm) Laputan(storm) and forall x (Laputan(x) -> Decrypt(x, barry)) -> therefore Decrypt(storm, barry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The evania dull the ernesta. The ernesta dull the evania. The ernesta is staunch. The ernesta deactivate the evania. The sonia is blameless. The sonia objectify the ernesta. The sonia deactivate the evania. If something dull the ernesta then the ernesta does not visit the sonia. If something objectify the evania then the evania is not recluse. If the ernesta deactivate the sonia and the ernesta is not blameless then the ernesta dull the evania. If something deactivate the evania then it is recluse. If something is recluse then it objectify the evania. If something is recluse then it objectify the evania. If something is staunch and it does not like the evania then it dull the evania. If something dull the evania and it objectify the sonia then it dull the sonia. The evania is not recluse.", "logic": "\nDull(evania, ernesta)\nDull(ernesta, evania)\nStaunch(ernesta)\nDeactivate(ernesta, evania)\nBlameless(sonia)\nObjectify(sonia, ernesta)\nDeactivate(sonia, evania)\nforall x (Dull(x, ernesta) -> not Deactivate(ernesta, sonia))\nforall x (Objectify(x, evania) -> not Recluse(evania))\nDeactivate(ernesta, sonia) and not Blameless(ernesta) -> Dull(ernesta, evania)\nforall x (Deactivate(x, evania) -> Recluse(x))\nforall x (Recluse(x) -> Objectify(x, evania))\nforall x (Recluse(x) -> Objectify(x, evania))\nforall x (Staunch(x) and not Objectify(x, evania) -> Dull(x, evania))\nforall x (Dull(x, evania) and Objectify(x, sonia) -> Dull(x, sonia))\n\nnot Recluse(evania)\n\nDeactivate(ernesta, evania) and forall x (Deactivate(x, evania) -> Recluse(x)) -> therefore Recluse(ernesta) Recluse(ernesta) and forall x (Recluse(x) -> Objectify(x, evania)) -> therefore Objectify(ernesta, evania) Objectify(ernesta, evania) and forall x (Objectify(x, evania) -> not Recluse(evania)) -> therefore not Recluse(evania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The belia malinger the mose. The mose malinger the belia. The mose is touristy. The mose underspend the belia. The barr is sliced. The barr relocate the mose. The barr underspend the belia. If something malinger the mose then the mose does not visit the barr. If something relocate the belia then the belia is not adenoidal. If the mose underspend the barr and the mose is not sliced then the mose malinger the belia. If something underspend the belia then it is adenoidal. If something is adenoidal then it relocate the belia. If something is adenoidal then it relocate the belia. If something is touristy and it does not like the belia then it malinger the belia. If something malinger the belia and it relocate the barr then it malinger the barr. The belia is adenoidal.", "logic": "\nMalinger(belia, mose)\nMalinger(mose, belia)\nTouristy(mose)\nUnderspend(mose, belia)\nSliced(barr)\nRelocate(barr, mose)\nUnderspend(barr, belia)\nforall x (Malinger(x, mose) -> not Underspend(mose, barr))\nforall x (Relocate(x, belia) -> not Adenoidal(belia))\nUnderspend(mose, barr) and not Sliced(mose) -> Malinger(mose, belia)\nforall x (Underspend(x, belia) -> Adenoidal(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Relocate(x, belia))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Relocate(x, belia))\nforall x (Touristy(x) and not Relocate(x, belia) -> Malinger(x, belia))\nforall x (Malinger(x, belia) and Relocate(x, barr) -> Malinger(x, barr))\n\nAdenoidal(belia)\n\nUnderspend(mose, belia) and forall x (Underspend(x, belia) -> Adenoidal(x)) -> therefore Adenoidal(mose) Adenoidal(mose) and forall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Relocate(x, belia)) -> therefore Relocate(mose, belia) Relocate(mose, belia) and forall x (Relocate(x, belia) -> not Adenoidal(belia)) -> therefore not Adenoidal(belia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The kennedy bromate the daryle. The daryle bromate the kennedy. The daryle is nonpublic. The daryle delimitate the kennedy. The lyda is honest. The lyda capture the daryle. The lyda delimitate the kennedy. If something bromate the daryle then the daryle does not visit the lyda. If something capture the kennedy then the kennedy is not peculiar. If the daryle delimitate the lyda and the daryle is not honest then the daryle bromate the kennedy. If something delimitate the kennedy then it is peculiar. If something is peculiar then it capture the kennedy. If something is peculiar then it capture the kennedy. If something is nonpublic and it does not like the kennedy then it bromate the kennedy. If something bromate the kennedy and it capture the lyda then it bromate the lyda. The kennedy does not like the kennedy.", "logic": "\nBromate(kennedy, daryle)\nBromate(daryle, kennedy)\nNonpublic(daryle)\nDelimitate(daryle, kennedy)\nHonest(lyda)\nCapture(lyda, daryle)\nDelimitate(lyda, kennedy)\nforall x (Bromate(x, daryle) -> not Delimitate(daryle, lyda))\nforall x (Capture(x, kennedy) -> not Peculiar(kennedy))\nDelimitate(daryle, lyda) and not Honest(daryle) -> Bromate(daryle, kennedy)\nforall x (Delimitate(x, kennedy) -> Peculiar(x))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) -> Capture(x, kennedy))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) -> Capture(x, kennedy))\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) and not Capture(x, kennedy) -> Bromate(x, kennedy))\nforall x (Bromate(x, kennedy) and Capture(x, lyda) -> Bromate(x, lyda))\n\nnot Capture(kennedy, kennedy)\n\nforall x (Peculiar(x) -> Capture(x, kennedy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The minny align the emma. The emma align the minny. The emma is manky. The emma yowl the minny. The willow is alaskan. The willow acetylate the emma. The willow yowl the minny. If something align the emma then the emma does not visit the willow. If something acetylate the minny then the minny is not gnarly. If the emma yowl the willow and the emma is not alaskan then the emma align the minny. If something yowl the minny then it is gnarly. If something is gnarly then it acetylate the minny. If something is gnarly then it acetylate the minny. If something is manky and it does not like the minny then it align the minny. If something align the minny and it acetylate the willow then it align the willow. The minny align the willow.", "logic": "\nAlign(minny, emma)\nAlign(emma, minny)\nManky(emma)\nYowl(emma, minny)\nAlaskan(willow)\nAcetylate(willow, emma)\nYowl(willow, minny)\nforall x (Align(x, emma) -> not Yowl(emma, willow))\nforall x (Acetylate(x, minny) -> not Gnarly(minny))\nYowl(emma, willow) and not Alaskan(emma) -> Align(emma, minny)\nforall x (Yowl(x, minny) -> Gnarly(x))\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Acetylate(x, minny))\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Acetylate(x, minny))\nforall x (Manky(x) and not Acetylate(x, minny) -> Align(x, minny))\nforall x (Align(x, minny) and Acetylate(x, willow) -> Align(x, willow))\n\nAlign(minny, willow)\n\nforall x (Align(x, minny) and Acetylate(x, willow) -> Align(x, willow)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The hailee rubify the sheldon. The sheldon rubify the hailee. The sheldon is psychical. The sheldon entrain the hailee. The margareta is eldritch. The margareta joggle the sheldon. The margareta entrain the hailee. If something rubify the sheldon then the sheldon does not visit the margareta. If something joggle the hailee then the hailee is not illiterate. If the sheldon entrain the margareta and the sheldon is not eldritch then the sheldon rubify the hailee. If something entrain the hailee then it is illiterate. If something is illiterate then it joggle the hailee. If something is illiterate then it joggle the hailee. If something is psychical and it does not like the hailee then it rubify the hailee. If something rubify the hailee and it joggle the margareta then it rubify the margareta. The margareta does not chase the hailee.", "logic": "\nRubify(hailee, sheldon)\nRubify(sheldon, hailee)\nPsychical(sheldon)\nEntrain(sheldon, hailee)\nEldritch(margareta)\nJoggle(margareta, sheldon)\nEntrain(margareta, hailee)\nforall x (Rubify(x, sheldon) -> not Entrain(sheldon, margareta))\nforall x (Joggle(x, hailee) -> not Illiterate(hailee))\nEntrain(sheldon, margareta) and not Eldritch(sheldon) -> Rubify(sheldon, hailee)\nforall x (Entrain(x, hailee) -> Illiterate(x))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) -> Joggle(x, hailee))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) -> Joggle(x, hailee))\nforall x (Psychical(x) and not Joggle(x, hailee) -> Rubify(x, hailee))\nforall x (Rubify(x, hailee) and Joggle(x, margareta) -> Rubify(x, margareta))\n\nnot Rubify(margareta, hailee)\n\nforall x (Psychical(x) and not Joggle(x, hailee) -> Rubify(x, hailee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The hershel whiz the gisela. The gisela whiz the hershel. The gisela is weatherly. The gisela express the hershel. The gwenneth is damnatory. The gwenneth curl the gisela. The gwenneth express the hershel. If something whiz the gisela then the gisela does not visit the gwenneth. If something curl the hershel then the hershel is not unfruitful. If the gisela express the gwenneth and the gisela is not damnatory then the gisela whiz the hershel. If something express the hershel then it is unfruitful. If something is unfruitful then it curl the hershel. If something is unfruitful then it curl the hershel. If something is weatherly and it does not like the hershel then it whiz the hershel. If something whiz the hershel and it curl the gwenneth then it whiz the gwenneth. The gisela whiz the gwenneth.", "logic": "\nWhiz(hershel, gisela)\nWhiz(gisela, hershel)\nWeatherly(gisela)\nExpress(gisela, hershel)\nDamnatory(gwenneth)\nCurl(gwenneth, gisela)\nExpress(gwenneth, hershel)\nforall x (Whiz(x, gisela) -> not Express(gisela, gwenneth))\nforall x (Curl(x, hershel) -> not Unfruitful(hershel))\nExpress(gisela, gwenneth) and not Damnatory(gisela) -> Whiz(gisela, hershel)\nforall x (Express(x, hershel) -> Unfruitful(x))\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) -> Curl(x, hershel))\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) -> Curl(x, hershel))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and not Curl(x, hershel) -> Whiz(x, hershel))\nforall x (Whiz(x, hershel) and Curl(x, gwenneth) -> Whiz(x, gwenneth))\n\nWhiz(gisela, gwenneth)\n\nforall x (Whiz(x, hershel) and Curl(x, gwenneth) -> Whiz(x, gwenneth)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The cherice expose the clementia. The clementia expose the cherice. The clementia is patriotic. The clementia dismiss the cherice. The cyndi is polyatomic. The cyndi last the clementia. The cyndi dismiss the cherice. If something expose the clementia then the clementia does not visit the cyndi. If something last the cherice then the cherice is not scrawny. If the clementia dismiss the cyndi and the clementia is not polyatomic then the clementia expose the cherice. If something dismiss the cherice then it is scrawny. If something is scrawny then it last the cherice. If something is scrawny then it last the cherice. If something is patriotic and it does not like the cherice then it expose the cherice. If something expose the cherice and it last the cyndi then it expose the cyndi. The clementia does not like the clementia.", "logic": "\nExpose(cherice, clementia)\nExpose(clementia, cherice)\nPatriotic(clementia)\nDismiss(clementia, cherice)\nPolyatomic(cyndi)\nLast(cyndi, clementia)\nDismiss(cyndi, cherice)\nforall x (Expose(x, clementia) -> not Dismiss(clementia, cyndi))\nforall x (Last(x, cherice) -> not Scrawny(cherice))\nDismiss(clementia, cyndi) and not Polyatomic(clementia) -> Expose(clementia, cherice)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, cherice) -> Scrawny(x))\nforall x (Scrawny(x) -> Last(x, cherice))\nforall x (Scrawny(x) -> Last(x, cherice))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) and not Last(x, cherice) -> Expose(x, cherice))\nforall x (Expose(x, cherice) and Last(x, cyndi) -> Expose(x, cyndi))\n\nnot Last(clementia, clementia)\n\nnot Last(clementia, clementia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The mirna survive the benton. The benton survive the mirna. The benton is boughless. The benton referee the mirna. The lotti is stripped. The lotti price the benton. The lotti referee the mirna. If something survive the benton then the benton does not visit the lotti. If something price the mirna then the mirna is not blackened. If the benton referee the lotti and the benton is not stripped then the benton survive the mirna. If something referee the mirna then it is blackened. If something is blackened then it price the mirna. If something is blackened then it price the mirna. If something is boughless and it does not like the mirna then it survive the mirna. If something survive the mirna and it price the lotti then it survive the lotti. The lotti referee the benton.", "logic": "\nSurvive(mirna, benton)\nSurvive(benton, mirna)\nBoughless(benton)\nReferee(benton, mirna)\nStripped(lotti)\nPrice(lotti, benton)\nReferee(lotti, mirna)\nforall x (Survive(x, benton) -> not Referee(benton, lotti))\nforall x (Price(x, mirna) -> not Blackened(mirna))\nReferee(benton, lotti) and not Stripped(benton) -> Survive(benton, mirna)\nforall x (Referee(x, mirna) -> Blackened(x))\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Price(x, mirna))\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Price(x, mirna))\nforall x (Boughless(x) and not Price(x, mirna) -> Survive(x, mirna))\nforall x (Survive(x, mirna) and Price(x, lotti) -> Survive(x, lotti))\n\nReferee(lotti, benton)\n\nReferee(lotti, benton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The prissie adolesce the hiram. The hiram adolesce the prissie. The hiram is uproarious. The hiram cloture the prissie. The miranda is basilary. The miranda dramatize the hiram. The miranda cloture the prissie. If something adolesce the hiram then the hiram does not visit the miranda. If something dramatize the prissie then the prissie is not tractile. If the hiram cloture the miranda and the hiram is not basilary then the hiram adolesce the prissie. If something cloture the prissie then it is tractile. If something is tractile then it dramatize the prissie. If something is tractile then it dramatize the prissie. If something is uproarious and it does not like the prissie then it adolesce the prissie. If something adolesce the prissie and it dramatize the miranda then it adolesce the miranda. The prissie does not like the miranda.", "logic": "\nAdolesce(prissie, hiram)\nAdolesce(hiram, prissie)\nUproarious(hiram)\nCloture(hiram, prissie)\nBasilary(miranda)\nDramatize(miranda, hiram)\nCloture(miranda, prissie)\nforall x (Adolesce(x, hiram) -> not Cloture(hiram, miranda))\nforall x (Dramatize(x, prissie) -> not Tractile(prissie))\nCloture(hiram, miranda) and not Basilary(hiram) -> Adolesce(hiram, prissie)\nforall x (Cloture(x, prissie) -> Tractile(x))\nforall x (Tractile(x) -> Dramatize(x, prissie))\nforall x (Tractile(x) -> Dramatize(x, prissie))\nforall x (Uproarious(x) and not Dramatize(x, prissie) -> Adolesce(x, prissie))\nforall x (Adolesce(x, prissie) and Dramatize(x, miranda) -> Adolesce(x, miranda))\n\nnot Dramatize(prissie, miranda)\n\nnot Dramatize(prissie, miranda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The chery combat the rubie. The rubie combat the chery. The rubie is sidelong. The rubie forge the chery. The arlie is startled. The arlie spud the rubie. The arlie forge the chery. If something combat the rubie then the rubie does not visit the arlie. If something spud the chery then the chery is not tawny. If the rubie forge the arlie and the rubie is not startled then the rubie combat the chery. If something forge the chery then it is tawny. If something is tawny then it spud the chery. If something is tawny then it spud the chery. If something is sidelong and it does not like the chery then it combat the chery. If something combat the chery and it spud the arlie then it combat the arlie. The rubie is nice.", "logic": "\nCombat(chery, rubie)\nCombat(rubie, chery)\nSidelong(rubie)\nForge(rubie, chery)\nStartled(arlie)\nSpud(arlie, rubie)\nForge(arlie, chery)\nforall x (Combat(x, rubie) -> not Forge(rubie, arlie))\nforall x (Spud(x, chery) -> not Tawny(chery))\nForge(rubie, arlie) and not Startled(rubie) -> Combat(rubie, chery)\nforall x (Forge(x, chery) -> Tawny(x))\nforall x (Tawny(x) -> Spud(x, chery))\nforall x (Tawny(x) -> Spud(x, chery))\nforall x (Sidelong(x) and not Spud(x, chery) -> Combat(x, chery))\nforall x (Combat(x, chery) and Spud(x, arlie) -> Combat(x, arlie))\n\nNice(rubie)\n\nNice(rubie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The hyacinth is not cephalopod. The hyacinth is not catamenial. The hyacinth orient the ted. The douglass treble the ted. The douglass is catamenial. The ted treble the hyacinth. The ted treble the douglass. The ted is vulcanized. The ted is cephalopod. The ted is vulvar. The ted does not like the hyacinth. The ted cartwheel the douglass. If someone orient the douglass and they do not see the hyacinth then the hyacinth is not catamenial. If someone treble the douglass and the douglass is vulcanized then the douglass treble the ted. If someone treble the hyacinth then they see the ted. If someone is cephalopod and they see the ted then the ted is depicted. If someone treble the hyacinth then they are cephalopod. If someone treble the douglass and they are depicted then the douglass does not chase the hyacinth. The hyacinth is not catamenial.", "logic": "\nnot Cephalopod(hyacinth)\nnot Catamenial(hyacinth)\nOrient(hyacinth, ted)\nTreble(douglass, ted)\nCatamenial(douglass)\nTreble(ted, hyacinth)\nTreble(ted, douglass)\nVulcanized(ted)\nCephalopod(ted)\nVulvar(ted)\nnot Orient(ted, hyacinth)\nCartwheel(ted, douglass)\nforall x (Orient(x, douglass) and not Cartwheel(x, hyacinth) -> not Catamenial(hyacinth))\nforall x (Treble(x, douglass) and Vulcanized(douglass) -> Treble(douglass, ted))\nforall x (Treble(x, hyacinth) -> Cartwheel(x, ted))\nforall x (Cephalopod(x) and Cartwheel(x, ted) -> Depicted(ted))\nforall x (Treble(x, hyacinth) -> Cephalopod(x))\nforall x (Treble(x, douglass) and Depicted(x) -> not Treble(douglass, hyacinth))\n\nnot Catamenial(hyacinth)\n\ntherefore not Catamenial(hyacinth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The jerold is not filarial. The jerold is not endless. The jerold ulcerate the jesselyn. The lorie heft the jesselyn. The lorie is endless. The jesselyn heft the jerold. The jesselyn heft the lorie. The jesselyn is distraught. The jesselyn is filarial. The jesselyn is transitory. The jesselyn does not like the jerold. The jesselyn foredoom the lorie. If someone ulcerate the lorie and they do not see the jerold then the jerold is not endless. If someone heft the lorie and the lorie is distraught then the lorie heft the jesselyn. If someone heft the jerold then they see the jesselyn. If someone is filarial and they see the jesselyn then the jesselyn is gloved. If someone heft the jerold then they are filarial. If someone heft the lorie and they are gloved then the lorie does not chase the jerold. The jesselyn is not distraught.", "logic": "\nnot Filarial(jerold)\nnot Endless(jerold)\nUlcerate(jerold, jesselyn)\nHeft(lorie, jesselyn)\nEndless(lorie)\nHeft(jesselyn, jerold)\nHeft(jesselyn, lorie)\nDistraught(jesselyn)\nFilarial(jesselyn)\nTransitory(jesselyn)\nnot Ulcerate(jesselyn, jerold)\nForedoom(jesselyn, lorie)\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, lorie) and not Foredoom(x, jerold) -> not Endless(jerold))\nforall x (Heft(x, lorie) and Distraught(lorie) -> Heft(lorie, jesselyn))\nforall x (Heft(x, jerold) -> Foredoom(x, jesselyn))\nforall x (Filarial(x) and Foredoom(x, jesselyn) -> Gloved(jesselyn))\nforall x (Heft(x, jerold) -> Filarial(x))\nforall x (Heft(x, lorie) and Gloved(x) -> not Heft(lorie, jerold))\n\nnot Distraught(jesselyn)\n\ntherefore Distraught(jesselyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The laird is not andean. The laird is not euphonic. The laird bail the dora. The appolonia fistfight the dora. The appolonia is euphonic. The dora fistfight the laird. The dora fistfight the appolonia. The dora is reflexed. The dora is andean. The dora is stomachal. The dora does not like the laird. The dora outfight the appolonia. If someone bail the appolonia and they do not see the laird then the laird is not euphonic. If someone fistfight the appolonia and the appolonia is reflexed then the appolonia fistfight the dora. If someone fistfight the laird then they see the dora. If someone is andean and they see the dora then the dora is qatari. If someone fistfight the laird then they are andean. If someone fistfight the appolonia and they are qatari then the appolonia does not chase the laird. The dora outfight the dora.", "logic": "\nnot Andean(laird)\nnot Euphonic(laird)\nBail(laird, dora)\nFistfight(appolonia, dora)\nEuphonic(appolonia)\nFistfight(dora, laird)\nFistfight(dora, appolonia)\nReflexed(dora)\nAndean(dora)\nStomachal(dora)\nnot Bail(dora, laird)\nOutfight(dora, appolonia)\nforall x (Bail(x, appolonia) and not Outfight(x, laird) -> not Euphonic(laird))\nforall x (Fistfight(x, appolonia) and Reflexed(appolonia) -> Fistfight(appolonia, dora))\nforall x (Fistfight(x, laird) -> Outfight(x, dora))\nforall x (Andean(x) and Outfight(x, dora) -> Qatari(dora))\nforall x (Fistfight(x, laird) -> Andean(x))\nforall x (Fistfight(x, appolonia) and Qatari(x) -> not Fistfight(appolonia, laird))\n\nOutfight(dora, dora)\n\nFistfight(dora, laird) and forall x (Fistfight(x, laird) -> Outfight(x, dora)) -> therefore Outfight(dora, dora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The holly is not homoerotic. The holly is not secluded. The holly cleanse the hendrik. The aub carpet the hendrik. The aub is secluded. The hendrik carpet the holly. The hendrik carpet the aub. The hendrik is cyclical. The hendrik is homoerotic. The hendrik is boughten. The hendrik does not like the holly. The hendrik babble the aub. If someone cleanse the aub and they do not see the holly then the holly is not secluded. If someone carpet the aub and the aub is cyclical then the aub carpet the hendrik. If someone carpet the holly then they see the hendrik. If someone is homoerotic and they see the hendrik then the hendrik is curricular. If someone carpet the holly then they are homoerotic. If someone carpet the aub and they are curricular then the aub does not chase the holly. The hendrik does not see the hendrik.", "logic": "\nnot Homoerotic(holly)\nnot Secluded(holly)\nCleanse(holly, hendrik)\nCarpet(aub, hendrik)\nSecluded(aub)\nCarpet(hendrik, holly)\nCarpet(hendrik, aub)\nCyclical(hendrik)\nHomoerotic(hendrik)\nBoughten(hendrik)\nnot Cleanse(hendrik, holly)\nBabble(hendrik, aub)\nforall x (Cleanse(x, aub) and not Babble(x, holly) -> not Secluded(holly))\nforall x (Carpet(x, aub) and Cyclical(aub) -> Carpet(aub, hendrik))\nforall x (Carpet(x, holly) -> Babble(x, hendrik))\nforall x (Homoerotic(x) and Babble(x, hendrik) -> Curricular(hendrik))\nforall x (Carpet(x, holly) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Carpet(x, aub) and Curricular(x) -> not Carpet(aub, holly))\n\nnot Babble(hendrik, hendrik)\n\nCarpet(hendrik, holly) and forall x (Carpet(x, holly) -> Babble(x, hendrik)) -> therefore Babble(hendrik, hendrik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The charlton is not asthenic. The charlton is not stinting. The charlton mismanage the laina. The becka urbanize the laina. The becka is stinting. The laina urbanize the charlton. The laina urbanize the becka. The laina is biracial. The laina is asthenic. The laina is delphian. The laina does not like the charlton. The laina cheer the becka. If someone mismanage the becka and they do not see the charlton then the charlton is not stinting. If someone urbanize the becka and the becka is biracial then the becka urbanize the laina. If someone urbanize the charlton then they see the laina. If someone is asthenic and they see the laina then the laina is tremulous. If someone urbanize the charlton then they are asthenic. If someone urbanize the becka and they are tremulous then the becka does not chase the charlton. The laina is tremulous.", "logic": "\nnot Asthenic(charlton)\nnot Stinting(charlton)\nMismanage(charlton, laina)\nUrbanize(becka, laina)\nStinting(becka)\nUrbanize(laina, charlton)\nUrbanize(laina, becka)\nBiracial(laina)\nAsthenic(laina)\nDelphian(laina)\nnot Mismanage(laina, charlton)\nCheer(laina, becka)\nforall x (Mismanage(x, becka) and not Cheer(x, charlton) -> not Stinting(charlton))\nforall x (Urbanize(x, becka) and Biracial(becka) -> Urbanize(becka, laina))\nforall x (Urbanize(x, charlton) -> Cheer(x, laina))\nforall x (Asthenic(x) and Cheer(x, laina) -> Tremulous(laina))\nforall x (Urbanize(x, charlton) -> Asthenic(x))\nforall x (Urbanize(x, becka) and Tremulous(x) -> not Urbanize(becka, charlton))\n\nTremulous(laina)\n\nUrbanize(laina, charlton) and forall x (Urbanize(x, charlton) -> Cheer(x, laina)) -> therefore Cheer(laina, laina) Asthenic(laina) and Cheer(laina, laina) and forall x (Asthenic(x) and Cheer(x, laina) -> Tremulous(laina)) -> therefore Tremulous(laina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The karry is not caruncular. The karry is not stock. The karry egress the gerty. The maryellen cramp the gerty. The maryellen is stock. The gerty cramp the karry. The gerty cramp the maryellen. The gerty is lxxv. The gerty is caruncular. The gerty is unsounded. The gerty does not like the karry. The gerty ditto the maryellen. If someone egress the maryellen and they do not see the karry then the karry is not stock. If someone cramp the maryellen and the maryellen is lxxv then the maryellen cramp the gerty. If someone cramp the karry then they see the gerty. If someone is caruncular and they see the gerty then the gerty is extramural. If someone cramp the karry then they are caruncular. If someone cramp the maryellen and they are extramural then the maryellen does not chase the karry. The gerty is not extramural.", "logic": "\nnot Caruncular(karry)\nnot Stock(karry)\nEgress(karry, gerty)\nCramp(maryellen, gerty)\nStock(maryellen)\nCramp(gerty, karry)\nCramp(gerty, maryellen)\nLxxv(gerty)\nCaruncular(gerty)\nUnsounded(gerty)\nnot Egress(gerty, karry)\nDitto(gerty, maryellen)\nforall x (Egress(x, maryellen) and not Ditto(x, karry) -> not Stock(karry))\nforall x (Cramp(x, maryellen) and Lxxv(maryellen) -> Cramp(maryellen, gerty))\nforall x (Cramp(x, karry) -> Ditto(x, gerty))\nforall x (Caruncular(x) and Ditto(x, gerty) -> Extramural(gerty))\nforall x (Cramp(x, karry) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Cramp(x, maryellen) and Extramural(x) -> not Cramp(maryellen, karry))\n\nnot Extramural(gerty)\n\nCramp(gerty, karry) and forall x (Cramp(x, karry) -> Ditto(x, gerty)) -> therefore Ditto(gerty, gerty) Caruncular(gerty) and Ditto(gerty, gerty) and forall x (Caruncular(x) and Ditto(x, gerty) -> Extramural(gerty)) -> therefore Extramural(gerty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The kaye is not upstair. The kaye is not perilous. The kaye feudalize the ruby. The andre carnify the ruby. The andre is perilous. The ruby carnify the kaye. The ruby carnify the andre. The ruby is heartening. The ruby is upstair. The ruby is sainted. The ruby does not like the kaye. The ruby bunco the andre. If someone feudalize the andre and they do not see the kaye then the kaye is not perilous. If someone carnify the andre and the andre is heartening then the andre carnify the ruby. If someone carnify the kaye then they see the ruby. If someone is upstair and they see the ruby then the ruby is nonspatial. If someone carnify the kaye then they are upstair. If someone carnify the andre and they are nonspatial then the andre does not chase the kaye. The andre does not chase the kaye.", "logic": "\nnot Upstair(kaye)\nnot Perilous(kaye)\nFeudalize(kaye, ruby)\nCarnify(andre, ruby)\nPerilous(andre)\nCarnify(ruby, kaye)\nCarnify(ruby, andre)\nHeartening(ruby)\nUpstair(ruby)\nSainted(ruby)\nnot Feudalize(ruby, kaye)\nBunco(ruby, andre)\nforall x (Feudalize(x, andre) and not Bunco(x, kaye) -> not Perilous(kaye))\nforall x (Carnify(x, andre) and Heartening(andre) -> Carnify(andre, ruby))\nforall x (Carnify(x, kaye) -> Bunco(x, ruby))\nforall x (Upstair(x) and Bunco(x, ruby) -> Nonspatial(ruby))\nforall x (Carnify(x, kaye) -> Upstair(x))\nforall x (Carnify(x, andre) and Nonspatial(x) -> not Carnify(andre, kaye))\n\nnot Carnify(andre, kaye)\n\nCarnify(ruby, kaye) and forall x (Carnify(x, kaye) -> Bunco(x, ruby)) -> therefore Bunco(ruby, ruby) Upstair(ruby) and Bunco(ruby, ruby) and forall x (Upstair(x) and Bunco(x, ruby) -> Nonspatial(ruby)) -> therefore Nonspatial(ruby) Carnify(ruby, andre) and Nonspatial(ruby) and forall x (Carnify(x, andre) and Nonspatial(x) -> not Carnify(andre, kaye)) -> therefore not Carnify(andre, kaye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The sydel is not diaphanous. The sydel is not unploughed. The sydel sober the jennilee. The elisabet decussate the jennilee. The elisabet is unploughed. The jennilee decussate the sydel. The jennilee decussate the elisabet. The jennilee is eutherian. The jennilee is diaphanous. The jennilee is antarctic. The jennilee does not like the sydel. The jennilee detail the elisabet. If someone sober the elisabet and they do not see the sydel then the sydel is not unploughed. If someone decussate the elisabet and the elisabet is eutherian then the elisabet decussate the jennilee. If someone decussate the sydel then they see the jennilee. If someone is diaphanous and they see the jennilee then the jennilee is portable. If someone decussate the sydel then they are diaphanous. If someone decussate the elisabet and they are portable then the elisabet does not chase the sydel. The elisabet decussate the sydel.", "logic": "\nnot Diaphanous(sydel)\nnot Unploughed(sydel)\nSober(sydel, jennilee)\nDecussate(elisabet, jennilee)\nUnploughed(elisabet)\nDecussate(jennilee, sydel)\nDecussate(jennilee, elisabet)\nEutherian(jennilee)\nDiaphanous(jennilee)\nAntarctic(jennilee)\nnot Sober(jennilee, sydel)\nDetail(jennilee, elisabet)\nforall x (Sober(x, elisabet) and not Detail(x, sydel) -> not Unploughed(sydel))\nforall x (Decussate(x, elisabet) and Eutherian(elisabet) -> Decussate(elisabet, jennilee))\nforall x (Decussate(x, sydel) -> Detail(x, jennilee))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) and Detail(x, jennilee) -> Portable(jennilee))\nforall x (Decussate(x, sydel) -> Diaphanous(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x, elisabet) and Portable(x) -> not Decussate(elisabet, sydel))\n\nDecussate(elisabet, sydel)\n\nDecussate(jennilee, sydel) and forall x (Decussate(x, sydel) -> Detail(x, jennilee)) -> therefore Detail(jennilee, jennilee) Diaphanous(jennilee) and Detail(jennilee, jennilee) and forall x (Diaphanous(x) and Detail(x, jennilee) -> Portable(jennilee)) -> therefore Portable(jennilee) Decussate(jennilee, elisabet) and Portable(jennilee) and forall x (Decussate(x, elisabet) and Portable(x) -> not Decussate(elisabet, sydel)) -> therefore not Decussate(elisabet, sydel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The adelina is not choosey. The adelina is not casuistic. The adelina blackwash the alejandra. The hildagard repercuss the alejandra. The hildagard is casuistic. The alejandra repercuss the adelina. The alejandra repercuss the hildagard. The alejandra is becoming. The alejandra is choosey. The alejandra is frantic. The alejandra does not like the adelina. The alejandra ensue the hildagard. If someone blackwash the hildagard and they do not see the adelina then the adelina is not casuistic. If someone repercuss the hildagard and the hildagard is becoming then the hildagard repercuss the alejandra. If someone repercuss the adelina then they see the alejandra. If someone is choosey and they see the alejandra then the alejandra is crowded. If someone repercuss the adelina then they are choosey. If someone repercuss the hildagard and they are crowded then the hildagard does not chase the adelina. The hildagard is not choosey.", "logic": "\nnot Choosey(adelina)\nnot Casuistic(adelina)\nBlackwash(adelina, alejandra)\nRepercuss(hildagard, alejandra)\nCasuistic(hildagard)\nRepercuss(alejandra, adelina)\nRepercuss(alejandra, hildagard)\nBecoming(alejandra)\nChoosey(alejandra)\nFrantic(alejandra)\nnot Blackwash(alejandra, adelina)\nEnsue(alejandra, hildagard)\nforall x (Blackwash(x, hildagard) and not Ensue(x, adelina) -> not Casuistic(adelina))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, hildagard) and Becoming(hildagard) -> Repercuss(hildagard, alejandra))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, adelina) -> Ensue(x, alejandra))\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Ensue(x, alejandra) -> Crowded(alejandra))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, adelina) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, hildagard) and Crowded(x) -> not Repercuss(hildagard, adelina))\n\nnot Choosey(hildagard)\n\nforall x (Repercuss(x, adelina) -> Choosey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The mellisa is not untellable. The mellisa is not concurrent. The mellisa marbleise the bess. The adele humbug the bess. The adele is concurrent. The bess humbug the mellisa. The bess humbug the adele. The bess is greased. The bess is untellable. The bess is seaworthy. The bess does not like the mellisa. The bess purge the adele. If someone marbleise the adele and they do not see the mellisa then the mellisa is not concurrent. If someone humbug the adele and the adele is greased then the adele humbug the bess. If someone humbug the mellisa then they see the bess. If someone is untellable and they see the bess then the bess is petite. If someone humbug the mellisa then they are untellable. If someone humbug the adele and they are petite then the adele does not chase the mellisa. The adele purge the bess.", "logic": "\nnot Untellable(mellisa)\nnot Concurrent(mellisa)\nMarbleise(mellisa, bess)\nHumbug(adele, bess)\nConcurrent(adele)\nHumbug(bess, mellisa)\nHumbug(bess, adele)\nGreased(bess)\nUntellable(bess)\nSeaworthy(bess)\nnot Marbleise(bess, mellisa)\nPurge(bess, adele)\nforall x (Marbleise(x, adele) and not Purge(x, mellisa) -> not Concurrent(mellisa))\nforall x (Humbug(x, adele) and Greased(adele) -> Humbug(adele, bess))\nforall x (Humbug(x, mellisa) -> Purge(x, bess))\nforall x (Untellable(x) and Purge(x, bess) -> Petite(bess))\nforall x (Humbug(x, mellisa) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Humbug(x, adele) and Petite(x) -> not Humbug(adele, mellisa))\n\nPurge(adele, bess)\n\nforall x (Humbug(x, mellisa) -> Purge(x, bess)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The wilber is not unembodied. The wilber is not genovese. The wilber ossify the stuart. The patty mollify the stuart. The patty is genovese. The stuart mollify the wilber. The stuart mollify the patty. The stuart is tubal. The stuart is unembodied. The stuart is formidable. The stuart does not like the wilber. The stuart atomise the patty. If someone ossify the patty and they do not see the wilber then the wilber is not genovese. If someone mollify the patty and the patty is tubal then the patty mollify the stuart. If someone mollify the wilber then they see the stuart. If someone is unembodied and they see the stuart then the stuart is aesthetic. If someone mollify the wilber then they are unembodied. If someone mollify the patty and they are aesthetic then the patty does not chase the wilber. The wilber does not see the stuart.", "logic": "\nnot Unembodied(wilber)\nnot Genovese(wilber)\nOssify(wilber, stuart)\nMollify(patty, stuart)\nGenovese(patty)\nMollify(stuart, wilber)\nMollify(stuart, patty)\nTubal(stuart)\nUnembodied(stuart)\nFormidable(stuart)\nnot Ossify(stuart, wilber)\nAtomise(stuart, patty)\nforall x (Ossify(x, patty) and not Atomise(x, wilber) -> not Genovese(wilber))\nforall x (Mollify(x, patty) and Tubal(patty) -> Mollify(patty, stuart))\nforall x (Mollify(x, wilber) -> Atomise(x, stuart))\nforall x (Unembodied(x) and Atomise(x, stuart) -> Aesthetic(stuart))\nforall x (Mollify(x, wilber) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Mollify(x, patty) and Aesthetic(x) -> not Mollify(patty, wilber))\n\nnot Atomise(wilber, stuart)\n\nforall x (Mollify(x, wilber) -> Atomise(x, stuart)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The chet is not clitoric. The chet is not pushy. The chet globalise the kania. The patel betray the kania. The patel is pushy. The kania betray the chet. The kania betray the patel. The kania is luteal. The kania is clitoric. The kania is chaetal. The kania does not like the chet. The kania amnesty the patel. If someone globalise the patel and they do not see the chet then the chet is not pushy. If someone betray the patel and the patel is luteal then the patel betray the kania. If someone betray the chet then they see the kania. If someone is clitoric and they see the kania then the kania is vexing. If someone betray the chet then they are clitoric. If someone betray the patel and they are vexing then the patel does not chase the chet. The patel globalise the kania.", "logic": "\nnot Clitoric(chet)\nnot Pushy(chet)\nGlobalise(chet, kania)\nBetray(patel, kania)\nPushy(patel)\nBetray(kania, chet)\nBetray(kania, patel)\nLuteal(kania)\nClitoric(kania)\nChaetal(kania)\nnot Globalise(kania, chet)\nAmnesty(kania, patel)\nforall x (Globalise(x, patel) and not Amnesty(x, chet) -> not Pushy(chet))\nforall x (Betray(x, patel) and Luteal(patel) -> Betray(patel, kania))\nforall x (Betray(x, chet) -> Amnesty(x, kania))\nforall x (Clitoric(x) and Amnesty(x, kania) -> Vexing(kania))\nforall x (Betray(x, chet) -> Clitoric(x))\nforall x (Betray(x, patel) and Vexing(x) -> not Betray(patel, chet))\n\nGlobalise(patel, kania)\n\nGlobalise(patel, kania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The verla is not flighted. The verla is not exchanged. The verla flagellate the caroljean. The phylis swear the caroljean. The phylis is exchanged. The caroljean swear the verla. The caroljean swear the phylis. The caroljean is adaptative. The caroljean is flighted. The caroljean is downy. The caroljean does not like the verla. The caroljean reprize the phylis. If someone flagellate the phylis and they do not see the verla then the verla is not exchanged. If someone swear the phylis and the phylis is adaptative then the phylis swear the caroljean. If someone swear the verla then they see the caroljean. If someone is flighted and they see the caroljean then the caroljean is baseless. If someone swear the verla then they are flighted. If someone swear the phylis and they are baseless then the phylis does not chase the verla. The caroljean does not chase the caroljean.", "logic": "\nnot Flighted(verla)\nnot Exchanged(verla)\nFlagellate(verla, caroljean)\nSwear(phylis, caroljean)\nExchanged(phylis)\nSwear(caroljean, verla)\nSwear(caroljean, phylis)\nAdaptative(caroljean)\nFlighted(caroljean)\nDowny(caroljean)\nnot Flagellate(caroljean, verla)\nReprize(caroljean, phylis)\nforall x (Flagellate(x, phylis) and not Reprize(x, verla) -> not Exchanged(verla))\nforall x (Swear(x, phylis) and Adaptative(phylis) -> Swear(phylis, caroljean))\nforall x (Swear(x, verla) -> Reprize(x, caroljean))\nforall x (Flighted(x) and Reprize(x, caroljean) -> Baseless(caroljean))\nforall x (Swear(x, verla) -> Flighted(x))\nforall x (Swear(x, phylis) and Baseless(x) -> not Swear(phylis, verla))\n\nnot Swear(caroljean, caroljean)\n\nnot Swear(caroljean, caroljean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The melantha is not flagging. The melantha is not propulsive. The melantha green the benedicta. The laird moor the benedicta. The laird is propulsive. The benedicta moor the melantha. The benedicta moor the laird. The benedicta is exact. The benedicta is flagging. The benedicta is despondent. The benedicta does not like the melantha. The benedicta expedite the laird. If someone green the laird and they do not see the melantha then the melantha is not propulsive. If someone moor the laird and the laird is exact then the laird moor the benedicta. If someone moor the melantha then they see the benedicta. If someone is flagging and they see the benedicta then the benedicta is inventive. If someone moor the melantha then they are flagging. If someone moor the laird and they are inventive then the laird does not chase the melantha. The benedicta green the laird.", "logic": "\nnot Flagging(melantha)\nnot Propulsive(melantha)\nGreen(melantha, benedicta)\nMoor(laird, benedicta)\nPropulsive(laird)\nMoor(benedicta, melantha)\nMoor(benedicta, laird)\nExact(benedicta)\nFlagging(benedicta)\nDespondent(benedicta)\nnot Green(benedicta, melantha)\nExpedite(benedicta, laird)\nforall x (Green(x, laird) and not Expedite(x, melantha) -> not Propulsive(melantha))\nforall x (Moor(x, laird) and Exact(laird) -> Moor(laird, benedicta))\nforall x (Moor(x, melantha) -> Expedite(x, benedicta))\nforall x (Flagging(x) and Expedite(x, benedicta) -> Inventive(benedicta))\nforall x (Moor(x, melantha) -> Flagging(x))\nforall x (Moor(x, laird) and Inventive(x) -> not Moor(laird, melantha))\n\nGreen(benedicta, laird)\n\nGreen(benedicta, laird) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The adrianna is not clockwise. The adrianna is not equal. The adrianna echo the reid. The lusa skim the reid. The lusa is equal. The reid skim the adrianna. The reid skim the lusa. The reid is arsenious. The reid is clockwise. The reid is scrubby. The reid does not like the adrianna. The reid sheet the lusa. If someone echo the lusa and they do not see the adrianna then the adrianna is not equal. If someone skim the lusa and the lusa is arsenious then the lusa skim the reid. If someone skim the adrianna then they see the reid. If someone is clockwise and they see the reid then the reid is futuristic. If someone skim the adrianna then they are clockwise. If someone skim the lusa and they are futuristic then the lusa does not chase the adrianna. The lusa does not like the lusa.", "logic": "\nnot Clockwise(adrianna)\nnot Equal(adrianna)\nEcho(adrianna, reid)\nSkim(lusa, reid)\nEqual(lusa)\nSkim(reid, adrianna)\nSkim(reid, lusa)\nArsenious(reid)\nClockwise(reid)\nScrubby(reid)\nnot Echo(reid, adrianna)\nSheet(reid, lusa)\nforall x (Echo(x, lusa) and not Sheet(x, adrianna) -> not Equal(adrianna))\nforall x (Skim(x, lusa) and Arsenious(lusa) -> Skim(lusa, reid))\nforall x (Skim(x, adrianna) -> Sheet(x, reid))\nforall x (Clockwise(x) and Sheet(x, reid) -> Futuristic(reid))\nforall x (Skim(x, adrianna) -> Clockwise(x))\nforall x (Skim(x, lusa) and Futuristic(x) -> not Skim(lusa, adrianna))\n\nnot Echo(lusa, lusa)\n\nnot Echo(lusa, lusa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The tamarah is not duplex. The tamarah is not tart. The tamarah emulsify the auria. The edita redesign the auria. The edita is tart. The auria redesign the tamarah. The auria redesign the edita. The auria is enwrapped. The auria is duplex. The auria is djiboutian. The auria does not like the tamarah. The auria kiss the edita. If someone emulsify the edita and they do not see the tamarah then the tamarah is not tart. If someone redesign the edita and the edita is enwrapped then the edita redesign the auria. If someone redesign the tamarah then they see the auria. If someone is duplex and they see the auria then the auria is trivial. If someone redesign the tamarah then they are duplex. If someone redesign the edita and they are trivial then the edita does not chase the tamarah. The tamarah emulsify the tamarah.", "logic": "\nnot Duplex(tamarah)\nnot Tart(tamarah)\nEmulsify(tamarah, auria)\nRedesign(edita, auria)\nTart(edita)\nRedesign(auria, tamarah)\nRedesign(auria, edita)\nEnwrapped(auria)\nDuplex(auria)\nDjiboutian(auria)\nnot Emulsify(auria, tamarah)\nKiss(auria, edita)\nforall x (Emulsify(x, edita) and not Kiss(x, tamarah) -> not Tart(tamarah))\nforall x (Redesign(x, edita) and Enwrapped(edita) -> Redesign(edita, auria))\nforall x (Redesign(x, tamarah) -> Kiss(x, auria))\nforall x (Duplex(x) and Kiss(x, auria) -> Trivial(auria))\nforall x (Redesign(x, tamarah) -> Duplex(x))\nforall x (Redesign(x, edita) and Trivial(x) -> not Redesign(edita, tamarah))\n\nEmulsify(tamarah, tamarah)\n\nEmulsify(tamarah, tamarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The mattheus flounce the chase. The mattheus flounce the roseann. The mattheus is baritone. The mattheus is unwrapped. The mattheus is dislocated. The mattheus officer the chase. The mattheus cleave the roseann. The chase flounce the roseann. The chase is antennary. The chase is flatulent. The chase officer the mattheus. The chase cleave the mattheus. The chase cleave the roseann. The roseann flounce the mattheus. The roseann is antennary. The roseann officer the mattheus. If the mattheus flounce the roseann then the roseann cleave the mattheus. If someone officer the mattheus then they are baritone. If someone cleave the mattheus then they see the roseann. If someone is unwrapped then they like the mattheus. If someone cleave the mattheus and they like the roseann then they are unwrapped. If someone officer the mattheus and the mattheus cleave the chase then the chase officer the mattheus. If someone flounce the mattheus and they see the mattheus then they like the roseann. If someone is dislocated and they see the roseann then the roseann officer the chase. The chase is antennary.", "logic": "\nFlounce(mattheus, chase)\nFlounce(mattheus, roseann)\nBaritone(mattheus)\nUnwrapped(mattheus)\nDislocated(mattheus)\nOfficer(mattheus, chase)\nCleave(mattheus, roseann)\nFlounce(chase, roseann)\nAntennary(chase)\nFlatulent(chase)\nOfficer(chase, mattheus)\nCleave(chase, mattheus)\nCleave(chase, roseann)\nFlounce(roseann, mattheus)\nAntennary(roseann)\nOfficer(roseann, mattheus)\nFlounce(mattheus, roseann) -> Cleave(roseann, mattheus)\nforall x (Officer(x, mattheus) -> Baritone(x))\nforall x (Cleave(x, mattheus) -> Cleave(x, roseann))\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Officer(x, mattheus))\nforall x (Cleave(x, mattheus) and Officer(x, roseann) -> Unwrapped(x))\nforall x (Officer(x, mattheus) and Cleave(mattheus, chase) -> Officer(chase, mattheus))\nforall x (Flounce(x, mattheus) and Cleave(x, mattheus) -> Officer(x, roseann))\nforall x (Dislocated(x) and Cleave(x, roseann) -> Officer(roseann, chase))\n\nAntennary(chase)\n\ntherefore Antennary(chase)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The libbey falter the anica. The libbey falter the mara. The libbey is oozing. The libbey is outclassed. The libbey is andalusian. The libbey clink the anica. The libbey favour the mara. The anica falter the mara. The anica is anatomical. The anica is stripped. The anica clink the libbey. The anica favour the libbey. The anica favour the mara. The mara falter the libbey. The mara is anatomical. The mara clink the libbey. If the libbey falter the mara then the mara favour the libbey. If someone clink the libbey then they are oozing. If someone favour the libbey then they see the mara. If someone is outclassed then they like the libbey. If someone favour the libbey and they like the mara then they are outclassed. If someone clink the libbey and the libbey favour the anica then the anica clink the libbey. If someone falter the libbey and they see the libbey then they like the mara. If someone is andalusian and they see the mara then the mara clink the anica. The libbey does not chase the mara.", "logic": "\nFalter(libbey, anica)\nFalter(libbey, mara)\nOozing(libbey)\nOutclassed(libbey)\nAndalusian(libbey)\nClink(libbey, anica)\nFavour(libbey, mara)\nFalter(anica, mara)\nAnatomical(anica)\nStripped(anica)\nClink(anica, libbey)\nFavour(anica, libbey)\nFavour(anica, mara)\nFalter(mara, libbey)\nAnatomical(mara)\nClink(mara, libbey)\nFalter(libbey, mara) -> Favour(mara, libbey)\nforall x (Clink(x, libbey) -> Oozing(x))\nforall x (Favour(x, libbey) -> Favour(x, mara))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) -> Clink(x, libbey))\nforall x (Favour(x, libbey) and Clink(x, mara) -> Outclassed(x))\nforall x (Clink(x, libbey) and Favour(libbey, anica) -> Clink(anica, libbey))\nforall x (Falter(x, libbey) and Favour(x, libbey) -> Clink(x, mara))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Favour(x, mara) -> Clink(mara, anica))\n\nnot Falter(libbey, mara)\n\ntherefore Falter(libbey, mara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The venkat enamour the robbyn. The venkat enamour the kial. The venkat is mindful. The venkat is bipinnate. The venkat is bursiform. The venkat swell the robbyn. The venkat stem the kial. The robbyn enamour the kial. The robbyn is gustative. The robbyn is naked. The robbyn swell the venkat. The robbyn stem the venkat. The robbyn stem the kial. The kial enamour the venkat. The kial is gustative. The kial swell the venkat. If the venkat enamour the kial then the kial stem the venkat. If someone swell the venkat then they are mindful. If someone stem the venkat then they see the kial. If someone is bipinnate then they like the venkat. If someone stem the venkat and they like the kial then they are bipinnate. If someone swell the venkat and the venkat stem the robbyn then the robbyn swell the venkat. If someone enamour the venkat and they see the venkat then they like the kial. If someone is bursiform and they see the kial then the kial swell the robbyn. The kial swell the robbyn.", "logic": "\nEnamour(venkat, robbyn)\nEnamour(venkat, kial)\nMindful(venkat)\nBipinnate(venkat)\nBursiform(venkat)\nSwell(venkat, robbyn)\nStem(venkat, kial)\nEnamour(robbyn, kial)\nGustative(robbyn)\nNaked(robbyn)\nSwell(robbyn, venkat)\nStem(robbyn, venkat)\nStem(robbyn, kial)\nEnamour(kial, venkat)\nGustative(kial)\nSwell(kial, venkat)\nEnamour(venkat, kial) -> Stem(kial, venkat)\nforall x (Swell(x, venkat) -> Mindful(x))\nforall x (Stem(x, venkat) -> Stem(x, kial))\nforall x (Bipinnate(x) -> Swell(x, venkat))\nforall x (Stem(x, venkat) and Swell(x, kial) -> Bipinnate(x))\nforall x (Swell(x, venkat) and Stem(venkat, robbyn) -> Swell(robbyn, venkat))\nforall x (Enamour(x, venkat) and Stem(x, venkat) -> Swell(x, kial))\nforall x (Bursiform(x) and Stem(x, kial) -> Swell(kial, robbyn))\n\nSwell(kial, robbyn)\n\nBursiform(venkat) and Stem(venkat, kial) and forall x (Bursiform(x) and Stem(x, kial) -> Swell(kial, robbyn)) -> therefore Swell(kial, robbyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The pris sprint the fitz. The pris sprint the eberhard. The pris is angered. The pris is interstate. The pris is filarial. The pris retick the fitz. The pris advertize the eberhard. The fitz sprint the eberhard. The fitz is tabular. The fitz is reticular. The fitz retick the pris. The fitz advertize the pris. The fitz advertize the eberhard. The eberhard sprint the pris. The eberhard is tabular. The eberhard retick the pris. If the pris sprint the eberhard then the eberhard advertize the pris. If someone retick the pris then they are angered. If someone advertize the pris then they see the eberhard. If someone is interstate then they like the pris. If someone advertize the pris and they like the eberhard then they are interstate. If someone retick the pris and the pris advertize the fitz then the fitz retick the pris. If someone sprint the pris and they see the pris then they like the eberhard. If someone is filarial and they see the eberhard then the eberhard retick the fitz. The pris does not like the pris.", "logic": "\nSprint(pris, fitz)\nSprint(pris, eberhard)\nAngered(pris)\nInterstate(pris)\nFilarial(pris)\nRetick(pris, fitz)\nAdvertize(pris, eberhard)\nSprint(fitz, eberhard)\nTabular(fitz)\nReticular(fitz)\nRetick(fitz, pris)\nAdvertize(fitz, pris)\nAdvertize(fitz, eberhard)\nSprint(eberhard, pris)\nTabular(eberhard)\nRetick(eberhard, pris)\nSprint(pris, eberhard) -> Advertize(eberhard, pris)\nforall x (Retick(x, pris) -> Angered(x))\nforall x (Advertize(x, pris) -> Advertize(x, eberhard))\nforall x (Interstate(x) -> Retick(x, pris))\nforall x (Advertize(x, pris) and Retick(x, eberhard) -> Interstate(x))\nforall x (Retick(x, pris) and Advertize(pris, fitz) -> Retick(fitz, pris))\nforall x (Sprint(x, pris) and Advertize(x, pris) -> Retick(x, eberhard))\nforall x (Filarial(x) and Advertize(x, eberhard) -> Retick(eberhard, fitz))\n\nnot Retick(pris, pris)\n\nInterstate(pris) and forall x (Interstate(x) -> Retick(x, pris)) -> therefore Retick(pris, pris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The caryn zinc the mathew. The caryn zinc the harrold. The caryn is livelong. The caryn is andorran. The caryn is fuzzy. The caryn disunify the mathew. The caryn condone the harrold. The mathew zinc the harrold. The mathew is tenanted. The mathew is aching. The mathew disunify the caryn. The mathew condone the caryn. The mathew condone the harrold. The harrold zinc the caryn. The harrold is tenanted. The harrold disunify the caryn. If the caryn zinc the harrold then the harrold condone the caryn. If someone disunify the caryn then they are livelong. If someone condone the caryn then they see the harrold. If someone is andorran then they like the caryn. If someone condone the caryn and they like the harrold then they are andorran. If someone disunify the caryn and the caryn condone the mathew then the mathew disunify the caryn. If someone zinc the caryn and they see the caryn then they like the harrold. If someone is fuzzy and they see the harrold then the harrold disunify the mathew. The harrold condone the harrold.", "logic": "\nZinc(caryn, mathew)\nZinc(caryn, harrold)\nLivelong(caryn)\nAndorran(caryn)\nFuzzy(caryn)\nDisunify(caryn, mathew)\nCondone(caryn, harrold)\nZinc(mathew, harrold)\nTenanted(mathew)\nAching(mathew)\nDisunify(mathew, caryn)\nCondone(mathew, caryn)\nCondone(mathew, harrold)\nZinc(harrold, caryn)\nTenanted(harrold)\nDisunify(harrold, caryn)\nZinc(caryn, harrold) -> Condone(harrold, caryn)\nforall x (Disunify(x, caryn) -> Livelong(x))\nforall x (Condone(x, caryn) -> Condone(x, harrold))\nforall x (Andorran(x) -> Disunify(x, caryn))\nforall x (Condone(x, caryn) and Disunify(x, harrold) -> Andorran(x))\nforall x (Disunify(x, caryn) and Condone(caryn, mathew) -> Disunify(mathew, caryn))\nforall x (Zinc(x, caryn) and Condone(x, caryn) -> Disunify(x, harrold))\nforall x (Fuzzy(x) and Condone(x, harrold) -> Disunify(harrold, mathew))\n\nCondone(harrold, harrold)\n\nZinc(caryn, harrold) and Zinc(caryn, harrold) -> Condone(harrold, caryn) -> therefore Condone(harrold, caryn) Condone(harrold, caryn) and forall x (Condone(x, caryn) -> Condone(x, harrold)) -> therefore Condone(harrold, harrold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The ernesto diazotize the larissa. The ernesto diazotize the cleopatra. The ernesto is asyndetic. The ernesto is unpackaged. The ernesto is reachable. The ernesto trice the larissa. The ernesto ferret the cleopatra. The larissa diazotize the cleopatra. The larissa is lank. The larissa is bacchic. The larissa trice the ernesto. The larissa ferret the ernesto. The larissa ferret the cleopatra. The cleopatra diazotize the ernesto. The cleopatra is lank. The cleopatra trice the ernesto. If the ernesto diazotize the cleopatra then the cleopatra ferret the ernesto. If someone trice the ernesto then they are asyndetic. If someone ferret the ernesto then they see the cleopatra. If someone is unpackaged then they like the ernesto. If someone ferret the ernesto and they like the cleopatra then they are unpackaged. If someone trice the ernesto and the ernesto ferret the larissa then the larissa trice the ernesto. If someone diazotize the ernesto and they see the ernesto then they like the cleopatra. If someone is reachable and they see the cleopatra then the cleopatra trice the larissa. The cleopatra does not see the cleopatra.", "logic": "\nDiazotize(ernesto, larissa)\nDiazotize(ernesto, cleopatra)\nAsyndetic(ernesto)\nUnpackaged(ernesto)\nReachable(ernesto)\nTrice(ernesto, larissa)\nFerret(ernesto, cleopatra)\nDiazotize(larissa, cleopatra)\nLank(larissa)\nBacchic(larissa)\nTrice(larissa, ernesto)\nFerret(larissa, ernesto)\nFerret(larissa, cleopatra)\nDiazotize(cleopatra, ernesto)\nLank(cleopatra)\nTrice(cleopatra, ernesto)\nDiazotize(ernesto, cleopatra) -> Ferret(cleopatra, ernesto)\nforall x (Trice(x, ernesto) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Ferret(x, ernesto) -> Ferret(x, cleopatra))\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Trice(x, ernesto))\nforall x (Ferret(x, ernesto) and Trice(x, cleopatra) -> Unpackaged(x))\nforall x (Trice(x, ernesto) and Ferret(ernesto, larissa) -> Trice(larissa, ernesto))\nforall x (Diazotize(x, ernesto) and Ferret(x, ernesto) -> Trice(x, cleopatra))\nforall x (Reachable(x) and Ferret(x, cleopatra) -> Trice(cleopatra, larissa))\n\nnot Ferret(cleopatra, cleopatra)\n\nDiazotize(ernesto, cleopatra) and Diazotize(ernesto, cleopatra) -> Ferret(cleopatra, ernesto) -> therefore Ferret(cleopatra, ernesto) Ferret(cleopatra, ernesto) and forall x (Ferret(x, ernesto) -> Ferret(x, cleopatra)) -> therefore Ferret(cleopatra, cleopatra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The maryjane jaywalk the avis. The maryjane jaywalk the neall. The maryjane is nodular. The maryjane is braised. The maryjane is fulgent. The maryjane miscount the avis. The maryjane cringe the neall. The avis jaywalk the neall. The avis is lost. The avis is lowbrow. The avis miscount the maryjane. The avis cringe the maryjane. The avis cringe the neall. The neall jaywalk the maryjane. The neall is lost. The neall miscount the maryjane. If the maryjane jaywalk the neall then the neall cringe the maryjane. If someone miscount the maryjane then they are nodular. If someone cringe the maryjane then they see the neall. If someone is braised then they like the maryjane. If someone cringe the maryjane and they like the neall then they are braised. If someone miscount the maryjane and the maryjane cringe the avis then the avis miscount the maryjane. If someone jaywalk the maryjane and they see the maryjane then they like the neall. If someone is fulgent and they see the neall then the neall miscount the avis. The neall is braised.", "logic": "\nJaywalk(maryjane, avis)\nJaywalk(maryjane, neall)\nNodular(maryjane)\nBraised(maryjane)\nFulgent(maryjane)\nMiscount(maryjane, avis)\nCringe(maryjane, neall)\nJaywalk(avis, neall)\nLost(avis)\nLowbrow(avis)\nMiscount(avis, maryjane)\nCringe(avis, maryjane)\nCringe(avis, neall)\nJaywalk(neall, maryjane)\nLost(neall)\nMiscount(neall, maryjane)\nJaywalk(maryjane, neall) -> Cringe(neall, maryjane)\nforall x (Miscount(x, maryjane) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Cringe(x, maryjane) -> Cringe(x, neall))\nforall x (Braised(x) -> Miscount(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Cringe(x, maryjane) and Miscount(x, neall) -> Braised(x))\nforall x (Miscount(x, maryjane) and Cringe(maryjane, avis) -> Miscount(avis, maryjane))\nforall x (Jaywalk(x, maryjane) and Cringe(x, maryjane) -> Miscount(x, neall))\nforall x (Fulgent(x) and Cringe(x, neall) -> Miscount(neall, avis))\n\nBraised(neall)\n\nJaywalk(maryjane, neall) and Jaywalk(maryjane, neall) -> Cringe(neall, maryjane) -> therefore Cringe(neall, maryjane) Jaywalk(maryjane, neall) and Jaywalk(maryjane, neall) -> Cringe(neall, maryjane) -> therefore Cringe(neall, maryjane) Jaywalk(neall, maryjane) and Cringe(neall, maryjane) and forall x (Jaywalk(x, maryjane) and Cringe(x, maryjane) -> Miscount(x, neall)) -> therefore Miscount(neall, neall) Cringe(neall, maryjane) and Miscount(neall, neall) and forall x (Cringe(x, maryjane) and Miscount(x, neall) -> Braised(x)) -> therefore Braised(neall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The rayna freshen the kaile. The rayna freshen the zorah. The rayna is malignant. The rayna is inertial. The rayna is apolitical. The rayna calender the kaile. The rayna secrete the zorah. The kaile freshen the zorah. The kaile is neutral. The kaile is crested. The kaile calender the rayna. The kaile secrete the rayna. The kaile secrete the zorah. The zorah freshen the rayna. The zorah is neutral. The zorah calender the rayna. If the rayna freshen the zorah then the zorah secrete the rayna. If someone calender the rayna then they are malignant. If someone secrete the rayna then they see the zorah. If someone is inertial then they like the rayna. If someone secrete the rayna and they like the zorah then they are inertial. If someone calender the rayna and the rayna secrete the kaile then the kaile calender the rayna. If someone freshen the rayna and they see the rayna then they like the zorah. If someone is apolitical and they see the zorah then the zorah calender the kaile. The zorah is not inertial.", "logic": "\nFreshen(rayna, kaile)\nFreshen(rayna, zorah)\nMalignant(rayna)\nInertial(rayna)\nApolitical(rayna)\nCalender(rayna, kaile)\nSecrete(rayna, zorah)\nFreshen(kaile, zorah)\nNeutral(kaile)\nCrested(kaile)\nCalender(kaile, rayna)\nSecrete(kaile, rayna)\nSecrete(kaile, zorah)\nFreshen(zorah, rayna)\nNeutral(zorah)\nCalender(zorah, rayna)\nFreshen(rayna, zorah) -> Secrete(zorah, rayna)\nforall x (Calender(x, rayna) -> Malignant(x))\nforall x (Secrete(x, rayna) -> Secrete(x, zorah))\nforall x (Inertial(x) -> Calender(x, rayna))\nforall x (Secrete(x, rayna) and Calender(x, zorah) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Calender(x, rayna) and Secrete(rayna, kaile) -> Calender(kaile, rayna))\nforall x (Freshen(x, rayna) and Secrete(x, rayna) -> Calender(x, zorah))\nforall x (Apolitical(x) and Secrete(x, zorah) -> Calender(zorah, kaile))\n\nnot Inertial(zorah)\n\nFreshen(rayna, zorah) and Freshen(rayna, zorah) -> Secrete(zorah, rayna) -> therefore Secrete(zorah, rayna) Freshen(rayna, zorah) and Freshen(rayna, zorah) -> Secrete(zorah, rayna) -> therefore Secrete(zorah, rayna) Freshen(zorah, rayna) and Secrete(zorah, rayna) and forall x (Freshen(x, rayna) and Secrete(x, rayna) -> Calender(x, zorah)) -> therefore Calender(zorah, zorah) Secrete(zorah, rayna) and Calender(zorah, zorah) and forall x (Secrete(x, rayna) and Calender(x, zorah) -> Inertial(x)) -> therefore Inertial(zorah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The elvera beatify the deidre. The elvera beatify the jobi. The elvera is pricey. The elvera is chiliastic. The elvera is pavlovian. The elvera slosh the deidre. The elvera cord the jobi. The deidre beatify the jobi. The deidre is seamy. The deidre is uppish. The deidre slosh the elvera. The deidre cord the elvera. The deidre cord the jobi. The jobi beatify the elvera. The jobi is seamy. The jobi slosh the elvera. If the elvera beatify the jobi then the jobi cord the elvera. If someone slosh the elvera then they are pricey. If someone cord the elvera then they see the jobi. If someone is chiliastic then they like the elvera. If someone cord the elvera and they like the jobi then they are chiliastic. If someone slosh the elvera and the elvera cord the deidre then the deidre slosh the elvera. If someone beatify the elvera and they see the elvera then they like the jobi. If someone is pavlovian and they see the jobi then the jobi slosh the deidre. The elvera does not like the jobi.", "logic": "\nBeatify(elvera, deidre)\nBeatify(elvera, jobi)\nPricey(elvera)\nChiliastic(elvera)\nPavlovian(elvera)\nSlosh(elvera, deidre)\nCord(elvera, jobi)\nBeatify(deidre, jobi)\nSeamy(deidre)\nUppish(deidre)\nSlosh(deidre, elvera)\nCord(deidre, elvera)\nCord(deidre, jobi)\nBeatify(jobi, elvera)\nSeamy(jobi)\nSlosh(jobi, elvera)\nBeatify(elvera, jobi) -> Cord(jobi, elvera)\nforall x (Slosh(x, elvera) -> Pricey(x))\nforall x (Cord(x, elvera) -> Cord(x, jobi))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) -> Slosh(x, elvera))\nforall x (Cord(x, elvera) and Slosh(x, jobi) -> Chiliastic(x))\nforall x (Slosh(x, elvera) and Cord(elvera, deidre) -> Slosh(deidre, elvera))\nforall x (Beatify(x, elvera) and Cord(x, elvera) -> Slosh(x, jobi))\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) and Cord(x, jobi) -> Slosh(jobi, deidre))\n\nnot Slosh(elvera, jobi)\n\nforall x (Beatify(x, elvera) and Cord(x, elvera) -> Slosh(x, jobi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The helli urticate the lauralee. The helli urticate the shana. The helli is ternary. The helli is lxiv. The helli is rational. The helli decolonise the lauralee. The helli total the shana. The lauralee urticate the shana. The lauralee is bosky. The lauralee is french. The lauralee decolonise the helli. The lauralee total the helli. The lauralee total the shana. The shana urticate the helli. The shana is bosky. The shana decolonise the helli. If the helli urticate the shana then the shana total the helli. If someone decolonise the helli then they are ternary. If someone total the helli then they see the shana. If someone is lxiv then they like the helli. If someone total the helli and they like the shana then they are lxiv. If someone decolonise the helli and the helli total the lauralee then the lauralee decolonise the helli. If someone urticate the helli and they see the helli then they like the shana. If someone is rational and they see the shana then the shana decolonise the lauralee. The lauralee decolonise the shana.", "logic": "\nUrticate(helli, lauralee)\nUrticate(helli, shana)\nTernary(helli)\nLxiv(helli)\nRational(helli)\nDecolonise(helli, lauralee)\nTotal(helli, shana)\nUrticate(lauralee, shana)\nBosky(lauralee)\nFrench(lauralee)\nDecolonise(lauralee, helli)\nTotal(lauralee, helli)\nTotal(lauralee, shana)\nUrticate(shana, helli)\nBosky(shana)\nDecolonise(shana, helli)\nUrticate(helli, shana) -> Total(shana, helli)\nforall x (Decolonise(x, helli) -> Ternary(x))\nforall x (Total(x, helli) -> Total(x, shana))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) -> Decolonise(x, helli))\nforall x (Total(x, helli) and Decolonise(x, shana) -> Lxiv(x))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, helli) and Total(helli, lauralee) -> Decolonise(lauralee, helli))\nforall x (Urticate(x, helli) and Total(x, helli) -> Decolonise(x, shana))\nforall x (Rational(x) and Total(x, shana) -> Decolonise(shana, lauralee))\n\nDecolonise(lauralee, shana)\n\nforall x (Urticate(x, helli) and Total(x, helli) -> Decolonise(x, shana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The gweneth betray the chelsey. The gweneth betray the evita. The gweneth is chirpy. The gweneth is lupine. The gweneth is paunchy. The gweneth sidetrack the chelsey. The gweneth mortice the evita. The chelsey betray the evita. The chelsey is bulging. The chelsey is biramous. The chelsey sidetrack the gweneth. The chelsey mortice the gweneth. The chelsey mortice the evita. The evita betray the gweneth. The evita is bulging. The evita sidetrack the gweneth. If the gweneth betray the evita then the evita mortice the gweneth. If someone sidetrack the gweneth then they are chirpy. If someone mortice the gweneth then they see the evita. If someone is lupine then they like the gweneth. If someone mortice the gweneth and they like the evita then they are lupine. If someone sidetrack the gweneth and the gweneth mortice the chelsey then the chelsey sidetrack the gweneth. If someone betray the gweneth and they see the gweneth then they like the evita. If someone is paunchy and they see the evita then the evita sidetrack the chelsey. The chelsey is not lupine.", "logic": "\nBetray(gweneth, chelsey)\nBetray(gweneth, evita)\nChirpy(gweneth)\nLupine(gweneth)\nPaunchy(gweneth)\nSidetrack(gweneth, chelsey)\nMortice(gweneth, evita)\nBetray(chelsey, evita)\nBulging(chelsey)\nBiramous(chelsey)\nSidetrack(chelsey, gweneth)\nMortice(chelsey, gweneth)\nMortice(chelsey, evita)\nBetray(evita, gweneth)\nBulging(evita)\nSidetrack(evita, gweneth)\nBetray(gweneth, evita) -> Mortice(evita, gweneth)\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, gweneth) -> Chirpy(x))\nforall x (Mortice(x, gweneth) -> Mortice(x, evita))\nforall x (Lupine(x) -> Sidetrack(x, gweneth))\nforall x (Mortice(x, gweneth) and Sidetrack(x, evita) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, gweneth) and Mortice(gweneth, chelsey) -> Sidetrack(chelsey, gweneth))\nforall x (Betray(x, gweneth) and Mortice(x, gweneth) -> Sidetrack(x, evita))\nforall x (Paunchy(x) and Mortice(x, evita) -> Sidetrack(evita, chelsey))\n\nnot Lupine(chelsey)\n\nforall x (Mortice(x, gweneth) and Sidetrack(x, evita) -> Lupine(x)) <- forall x (Betray(x, gweneth) and Mortice(x, gweneth) -> Sidetrack(x, evita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The cristabel clutch the brooke. The cristabel clutch the giselle. The cristabel is guardant. The cristabel is gimpy. The cristabel is creditable. The cristabel reminisce the brooke. The cristabel careen the giselle. The brooke clutch the giselle. The brooke is hardline. The brooke is melanesian. The brooke reminisce the cristabel. The brooke careen the cristabel. The brooke careen the giselle. The giselle clutch the cristabel. The giselle is hardline. The giselle reminisce the cristabel. If the cristabel clutch the giselle then the giselle careen the cristabel. If someone reminisce the cristabel then they are guardant. If someone careen the cristabel then they see the giselle. If someone is gimpy then they like the cristabel. If someone careen the cristabel and they like the giselle then they are gimpy. If someone reminisce the cristabel and the cristabel careen the brooke then the brooke reminisce the cristabel. If someone clutch the cristabel and they see the cristabel then they like the giselle. If someone is creditable and they see the giselle then the giselle reminisce the brooke. The brooke is creditable.", "logic": "\nClutch(cristabel, brooke)\nClutch(cristabel, giselle)\nGuardant(cristabel)\nGimpy(cristabel)\nCreditable(cristabel)\nReminisce(cristabel, brooke)\nCareen(cristabel, giselle)\nClutch(brooke, giselle)\nHardline(brooke)\nMelanesian(brooke)\nReminisce(brooke, cristabel)\nCareen(brooke, cristabel)\nCareen(brooke, giselle)\nClutch(giselle, cristabel)\nHardline(giselle)\nReminisce(giselle, cristabel)\nClutch(cristabel, giselle) -> Careen(giselle, cristabel)\nforall x (Reminisce(x, cristabel) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Careen(x, cristabel) -> Careen(x, giselle))\nforall x (Gimpy(x) -> Reminisce(x, cristabel))\nforall x (Careen(x, cristabel) and Reminisce(x, giselle) -> Gimpy(x))\nforall x (Reminisce(x, cristabel) and Careen(cristabel, brooke) -> Reminisce(brooke, cristabel))\nforall x (Clutch(x, cristabel) and Careen(x, cristabel) -> Reminisce(x, giselle))\nforall x (Creditable(x) and Careen(x, giselle) -> Reminisce(giselle, brooke))\n\nCreditable(brooke)\n\nCreditable(brooke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The kai imprint the paloma. The kai imprint the flower. The kai is alchemical. The kai is spiritless. The kai is neural. The kai gray the paloma. The kai contravene the flower. The paloma imprint the flower. The paloma is iliac. The paloma is phonetic. The paloma gray the kai. The paloma contravene the kai. The paloma contravene the flower. The flower imprint the kai. The flower is iliac. The flower gray the kai. If the kai imprint the flower then the flower contravene the kai. If someone gray the kai then they are alchemical. If someone contravene the kai then they see the flower. If someone is spiritless then they like the kai. If someone contravene the kai and they like the flower then they are spiritless. If someone gray the kai and the kai contravene the paloma then the paloma gray the kai. If someone imprint the kai and they see the kai then they like the flower. If someone is neural and they see the flower then the flower gray the paloma. The flower is not neural.", "logic": "\nImprint(kai, paloma)\nImprint(kai, flower)\nAlchemical(kai)\nSpiritless(kai)\nNeural(kai)\nGray(kai, paloma)\nContravene(kai, flower)\nImprint(paloma, flower)\nIliac(paloma)\nPhonetic(paloma)\nGray(paloma, kai)\nContravene(paloma, kai)\nContravene(paloma, flower)\nImprint(flower, kai)\nIliac(flower)\nGray(flower, kai)\nImprint(kai, flower) -> Contravene(flower, kai)\nforall x (Gray(x, kai) -> Alchemical(x))\nforall x (Contravene(x, kai) -> Contravene(x, flower))\nforall x (Spiritless(x) -> Gray(x, kai))\nforall x (Contravene(x, kai) and Gray(x, flower) -> Spiritless(x))\nforall x (Gray(x, kai) and Contravene(kai, paloma) -> Gray(paloma, kai))\nforall x (Imprint(x, kai) and Contravene(x, kai) -> Gray(x, flower))\nforall x (Neural(x) and Contravene(x, flower) -> Gray(flower, paloma))\n\nnot Neural(flower)\n\nnot Neural(flower) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The keith heal the sebastian. The keith heal the sib. The keith is unheeded. The keith is deckled. The keith is cotyloidal. The keith excrete the sebastian. The keith affront the sib. The sebastian heal the sib. The sebastian is monthly. The sebastian is childless. The sebastian excrete the keith. The sebastian affront the keith. The sebastian affront the sib. The sib heal the keith. The sib is monthly. The sib excrete the keith. If the keith heal the sib then the sib affront the keith. If someone excrete the keith then they are unheeded. If someone affront the keith then they see the sib. If someone is deckled then they like the keith. If someone affront the keith and they like the sib then they are deckled. If someone excrete the keith and the keith affront the sebastian then the sebastian excrete the keith. If someone heal the keith and they see the keith then they like the sib. If someone is cotyloidal and they see the sib then the sib excrete the sebastian. The sib heal the sebastian.", "logic": "\nHeal(keith, sebastian)\nHeal(keith, sib)\nUnheeded(keith)\nDeckled(keith)\nCotyloidal(keith)\nExcrete(keith, sebastian)\nAffront(keith, sib)\nHeal(sebastian, sib)\nMonthly(sebastian)\nChildless(sebastian)\nExcrete(sebastian, keith)\nAffront(sebastian, keith)\nAffront(sebastian, sib)\nHeal(sib, keith)\nMonthly(sib)\nExcrete(sib, keith)\nHeal(keith, sib) -> Affront(sib, keith)\nforall x (Excrete(x, keith) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Affront(x, keith) -> Affront(x, sib))\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Excrete(x, keith))\nforall x (Affront(x, keith) and Excrete(x, sib) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Excrete(x, keith) and Affront(keith, sebastian) -> Excrete(sebastian, keith))\nforall x (Heal(x, keith) and Affront(x, keith) -> Excrete(x, sib))\nforall x (Cotyloidal(x) and Affront(x, sib) -> Excrete(sib, sebastian))\n\nHeal(sib, sebastian)\n\nHeal(sib, sebastian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The jobina background the giordano. The jobina background the adelice. The jobina is unplayable. The jobina is veinlike. The jobina is magnetic. The jobina scroll the giordano. The jobina stash the adelice. The giordano background the adelice. The giordano is unbigoted. The giordano is phosphoric. The giordano scroll the jobina. The giordano stash the jobina. The giordano stash the adelice. The adelice background the jobina. The adelice is unbigoted. The adelice scroll the jobina. If the jobina background the adelice then the adelice stash the jobina. If someone scroll the jobina then they are unplayable. If someone stash the jobina then they see the adelice. If someone is veinlike then they like the jobina. If someone stash the jobina and they like the adelice then they are veinlike. If someone scroll the jobina and the jobina stash the giordano then the giordano scroll the jobina. If someone background the jobina and they see the jobina then they like the adelice. If someone is magnetic and they see the adelice then the adelice scroll the giordano. The giordano does not like the giordano.", "logic": "\nBackground(jobina, giordano)\nBackground(jobina, adelice)\nUnplayable(jobina)\nVeinlike(jobina)\nMagnetic(jobina)\nScroll(jobina, giordano)\nStash(jobina, adelice)\nBackground(giordano, adelice)\nUnbigoted(giordano)\nPhosphoric(giordano)\nScroll(giordano, jobina)\nStash(giordano, jobina)\nStash(giordano, adelice)\nBackground(adelice, jobina)\nUnbigoted(adelice)\nScroll(adelice, jobina)\nBackground(jobina, adelice) -> Stash(adelice, jobina)\nforall x (Scroll(x, jobina) -> Unplayable(x))\nforall x (Stash(x, jobina) -> Stash(x, adelice))\nforall x (Veinlike(x) -> Scroll(x, jobina))\nforall x (Stash(x, jobina) and Scroll(x, adelice) -> Veinlike(x))\nforall x (Scroll(x, jobina) and Stash(jobina, giordano) -> Scroll(giordano, jobina))\nforall x (Background(x, jobina) and Stash(x, jobina) -> Scroll(x, adelice))\nforall x (Magnetic(x) and Stash(x, adelice) -> Scroll(adelice, giordano))\n\nnot Scroll(giordano, giordano)\n\nnot Scroll(giordano, giordano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The ruben ovenbake the rhody. The ruben ovenbake the patrick. The ruben is economic. The ruben is septicemic. The ruben is weighted. The ruben groan the rhody. The ruben smelt the patrick. The rhody ovenbake the patrick. The rhody is shriveled. The rhody is hyperopic. The rhody groan the ruben. The rhody smelt the ruben. The rhody smelt the patrick. The patrick ovenbake the ruben. The patrick is shriveled. The patrick groan the ruben. If the ruben ovenbake the patrick then the patrick smelt the ruben. If someone groan the ruben then they are economic. If someone smelt the ruben then they see the patrick. If someone is septicemic then they like the ruben. If someone smelt the ruben and they like the patrick then they are septicemic. If someone groan the ruben and the ruben smelt the rhody then the rhody groan the ruben. If someone ovenbake the ruben and they see the ruben then they like the patrick. If someone is weighted and they see the patrick then the patrick groan the rhody. The ruben smelt the rhody.", "logic": "\nOvenbake(ruben, rhody)\nOvenbake(ruben, patrick)\nEconomic(ruben)\nSepticemic(ruben)\nWeighted(ruben)\nGroan(ruben, rhody)\nSmelt(ruben, patrick)\nOvenbake(rhody, patrick)\nShriveled(rhody)\nHyperopic(rhody)\nGroan(rhody, ruben)\nSmelt(rhody, ruben)\nSmelt(rhody, patrick)\nOvenbake(patrick, ruben)\nShriveled(patrick)\nGroan(patrick, ruben)\nOvenbake(ruben, patrick) -> Smelt(patrick, ruben)\nforall x (Groan(x, ruben) -> Economic(x))\nforall x (Smelt(x, ruben) -> Smelt(x, patrick))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) -> Groan(x, ruben))\nforall x (Smelt(x, ruben) and Groan(x, patrick) -> Septicemic(x))\nforall x (Groan(x, ruben) and Smelt(ruben, rhody) -> Groan(rhody, ruben))\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, ruben) and Smelt(x, ruben) -> Groan(x, patrick))\nforall x (Weighted(x) and Smelt(x, patrick) -> Groan(patrick, rhody))\n\nSmelt(ruben, rhody)\n\nSmelt(ruben, rhody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The kevyn despoil the eirena. The kevyn despoil the ruben. The kevyn is unpaired. The kevyn refuse the eirena. The kevyn refuse the ruben. The eirena despoil the kevyn. The eirena despoil the ruben. The eirena is special. The eirena obstruct the kevyn. The eirena obstruct the ruben. The eirena refuse the ruben. The ruben is special. The ruben is emmetropic. The ruben obstruct the eirena. The ruben refuse the kevyn. The ruben refuse the eirena. If someone despoil the eirena and they need the ruben then the eirena despoil the kevyn. If someone is agrologic and they chase the ruben then they need the kevyn. If someone obstruct the kevyn then they chase the eirena. If someone despoil the eirena and they see the eirena then they need the ruben. Young, special people are assertive. If someone despoil the kevyn and the kevyn obstruct the ruben then they are special. If someone is assertive then they need the kevyn. If someone refuse the eirena then the eirena despoil the kevyn. The kevyn refuse the ruben.", "logic": "\nDespoil(kevyn, eirena)\nDespoil(kevyn, ruben)\nUnpaired(kevyn)\nRefuse(kevyn, eirena)\nRefuse(kevyn, ruben)\nDespoil(eirena, kevyn)\nDespoil(eirena, ruben)\nSpecial(eirena)\nObstruct(eirena, kevyn)\nObstruct(eirena, ruben)\nRefuse(eirena, ruben)\nSpecial(ruben)\nEmmetropic(ruben)\nObstruct(ruben, eirena)\nRefuse(ruben, kevyn)\nRefuse(ruben, eirena)\nforall x (Despoil(x, eirena) and Obstruct(x, ruben) -> Despoil(eirena, kevyn))\nforall x (Agrologic(x) and Despoil(x, ruben) -> Obstruct(x, kevyn))\nforall x (Obstruct(x, kevyn) -> Despoil(x, eirena))\nforall x (Despoil(x, eirena) and Refuse(x, eirena) -> Obstruct(x, ruben))\nforall x (Emmetropic(x) and Special(x) -> Assertive(x))\nforall x (Despoil(x, kevyn) and Obstruct(kevyn, ruben) -> Special(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) -> Obstruct(x, kevyn))\nforall x (Refuse(x, eirena) -> Despoil(eirena, kevyn))\n\nRefuse(kevyn, ruben)\n\ntherefore Refuse(kevyn, ruben)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The octavius holler the timmy. The octavius holler the claudine. The octavius is perfervid. The octavius dehorn the timmy. The octavius dehorn the claudine. The timmy holler the octavius. The timmy holler the claudine. The timmy is kindly. The timmy manacle the octavius. The timmy manacle the claudine. The timmy dehorn the claudine. The claudine is kindly. The claudine is negative. The claudine manacle the timmy. The claudine dehorn the octavius. The claudine dehorn the timmy. If someone holler the timmy and they need the claudine then the timmy holler the octavius. If someone is phonologic and they chase the claudine then they need the octavius. If someone manacle the octavius then they chase the timmy. If someone holler the timmy and they see the timmy then they need the claudine. Young, kindly people are catoptric. If someone holler the octavius and the octavius manacle the claudine then they are kindly. If someone is catoptric then they need the octavius. If someone dehorn the timmy then the timmy holler the octavius. The timmy does not see the claudine.", "logic": "\nHoller(octavius, timmy)\nHoller(octavius, claudine)\nPerfervid(octavius)\nDehorn(octavius, timmy)\nDehorn(octavius, claudine)\nHoller(timmy, octavius)\nHoller(timmy, claudine)\nKindly(timmy)\nManacle(timmy, octavius)\nManacle(timmy, claudine)\nDehorn(timmy, claudine)\nKindly(claudine)\nNegative(claudine)\nManacle(claudine, timmy)\nDehorn(claudine, octavius)\nDehorn(claudine, timmy)\nforall x (Holler(x, timmy) and Manacle(x, claudine) -> Holler(timmy, octavius))\nforall x (Phonologic(x) and Holler(x, claudine) -> Manacle(x, octavius))\nforall x (Manacle(x, octavius) -> Holler(x, timmy))\nforall x (Holler(x, timmy) and Dehorn(x, timmy) -> Manacle(x, claudine))\nforall x (Negative(x) and Kindly(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Holler(x, octavius) and Manacle(octavius, claudine) -> Kindly(x))\nforall x (Catoptric(x) -> Manacle(x, octavius))\nforall x (Dehorn(x, timmy) -> Holler(timmy, octavius))\n\nnot Dehorn(timmy, claudine)\n\ntherefore Dehorn(timmy, claudine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The aleecia shoehorn the aleen. The aleecia shoehorn the rivkah. The aleecia is pagan. The aleecia admix the aleen. The aleecia admix the rivkah. The aleen shoehorn the aleecia. The aleen shoehorn the rivkah. The aleen is licit. The aleen handcolour the aleecia. The aleen handcolour the rivkah. The aleen admix the rivkah. The rivkah is licit. The rivkah is stressed. The rivkah handcolour the aleen. The rivkah admix the aleecia. The rivkah admix the aleen. If someone shoehorn the aleen and they need the rivkah then the aleen shoehorn the aleecia. If someone is footsore and they chase the rivkah then they need the aleecia. If someone handcolour the aleecia then they chase the aleen. If someone shoehorn the aleen and they see the aleen then they need the rivkah. Young, licit people are upstairs. If someone shoehorn the aleecia and the aleecia handcolour the rivkah then they are licit. If someone is upstairs then they need the aleecia. If someone admix the aleen then the aleen shoehorn the aleecia. The aleecia handcolour the rivkah.", "logic": "\nShoehorn(aleecia, aleen)\nShoehorn(aleecia, rivkah)\nPagan(aleecia)\nAdmix(aleecia, aleen)\nAdmix(aleecia, rivkah)\nShoehorn(aleen, aleecia)\nShoehorn(aleen, rivkah)\nLicit(aleen)\nHandcolour(aleen, aleecia)\nHandcolour(aleen, rivkah)\nAdmix(aleen, rivkah)\nLicit(rivkah)\nStressed(rivkah)\nHandcolour(rivkah, aleen)\nAdmix(rivkah, aleecia)\nAdmix(rivkah, aleen)\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, aleen) and Handcolour(x, rivkah) -> Shoehorn(aleen, aleecia))\nforall x (Footsore(x) and Shoehorn(x, rivkah) -> Handcolour(x, aleecia))\nforall x (Handcolour(x, aleecia) -> Shoehorn(x, aleen))\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, aleen) and Admix(x, aleen) -> Handcolour(x, rivkah))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and Licit(x) -> Upstairs(x))\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, aleecia) and Handcolour(aleecia, rivkah) -> Licit(x))\nforall x (Upstairs(x) -> Handcolour(x, aleecia))\nforall x (Admix(x, aleen) -> Shoehorn(aleen, aleecia))\n\nHandcolour(aleecia, rivkah)\n\nShoehorn(aleecia, aleen) and Admix(aleecia, aleen) and forall x (Shoehorn(x, aleen) and Admix(x, aleen) -> Handcolour(x, rivkah)) -> therefore Handcolour(aleecia, rivkah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The annelise sacrifice the seka. The annelise sacrifice the molli. The annelise is exculpated. The annelise puff the seka. The annelise puff the molli. The seka sacrifice the annelise. The seka sacrifice the molli. The seka is doubting. The seka shamanise the annelise. The seka shamanise the molli. The seka puff the molli. The molli is doubting. The molli is catabatic. The molli shamanise the seka. The molli puff the annelise. The molli puff the seka. If someone sacrifice the seka and they need the molli then the seka sacrifice the annelise. If someone is unplaced and they chase the molli then they need the annelise. If someone shamanise the annelise then they chase the seka. If someone sacrifice the seka and they see the seka then they need the molli. Young, doubting people are compatible. If someone sacrifice the annelise and the annelise shamanise the molli then they are doubting. If someone is compatible then they need the annelise. If someone puff the seka then the seka sacrifice the annelise. The annelise does not need the molli.", "logic": "\nSacrifice(annelise, seka)\nSacrifice(annelise, molli)\nExculpated(annelise)\nPuff(annelise, seka)\nPuff(annelise, molli)\nSacrifice(seka, annelise)\nSacrifice(seka, molli)\nDoubting(seka)\nShamanise(seka, annelise)\nShamanise(seka, molli)\nPuff(seka, molli)\nDoubting(molli)\nCatabatic(molli)\nShamanise(molli, seka)\nPuff(molli, annelise)\nPuff(molli, seka)\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, seka) and Shamanise(x, molli) -> Sacrifice(seka, annelise))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) and Sacrifice(x, molli) -> Shamanise(x, annelise))\nforall x (Shamanise(x, annelise) -> Sacrifice(x, seka))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, seka) and Puff(x, seka) -> Shamanise(x, molli))\nforall x (Catabatic(x) and Doubting(x) -> Compatible(x))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, annelise) and Shamanise(annelise, molli) -> Doubting(x))\nforall x (Compatible(x) -> Shamanise(x, annelise))\nforall x (Puff(x, seka) -> Sacrifice(seka, annelise))\n\nnot Shamanise(annelise, molli)\n\nSacrifice(annelise, seka) and Puff(annelise, seka) and forall x (Sacrifice(x, seka) and Puff(x, seka) -> Shamanise(x, molli)) -> therefore Shamanise(annelise, molli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The dena purr the pete. The dena purr the lucilia. The dena is megascopic. The dena realign the pete. The dena realign the lucilia. The pete purr the dena. The pete purr the lucilia. The pete is axile. The pete invalid the dena. The pete invalid the lucilia. The pete realign the lucilia. The lucilia is axile. The lucilia is carinated. The lucilia invalid the pete. The lucilia realign the dena. The lucilia realign the pete. If someone purr the pete and they need the lucilia then the pete purr the dena. If someone is esurient and they chase the lucilia then they need the dena. If someone invalid the dena then they chase the pete. If someone purr the pete and they see the pete then they need the lucilia. Young, axile people are subacid. If someone purr the dena and the dena invalid the lucilia then they are axile. If someone is subacid then they need the dena. If someone realign the pete then the pete purr the dena. The lucilia invalid the dena.", "logic": "\nPurr(dena, pete)\nPurr(dena, lucilia)\nMegascopic(dena)\nRealign(dena, pete)\nRealign(dena, lucilia)\nPurr(pete, dena)\nPurr(pete, lucilia)\nAxile(pete)\nInvalid(pete, dena)\nInvalid(pete, lucilia)\nRealign(pete, lucilia)\nAxile(lucilia)\nCarinated(lucilia)\nInvalid(lucilia, pete)\nRealign(lucilia, dena)\nRealign(lucilia, pete)\nforall x (Purr(x, pete) and Invalid(x, lucilia) -> Purr(pete, dena))\nforall x (Esurient(x) and Purr(x, lucilia) -> Invalid(x, dena))\nforall x (Invalid(x, dena) -> Purr(x, pete))\nforall x (Purr(x, pete) and Realign(x, pete) -> Invalid(x, lucilia))\nforall x (Carinated(x) and Axile(x) -> Subacid(x))\nforall x (Purr(x, dena) and Invalid(dena, lucilia) -> Axile(x))\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> Invalid(x, dena))\nforall x (Realign(x, pete) -> Purr(pete, dena))\n\nInvalid(lucilia, dena)\n\nCarinated(lucilia) and Axile(lucilia) and forall x (Carinated(x) and Axile(x) -> Subacid(x)) -> therefore Subacid(lucilia) Subacid(lucilia) and forall x (Subacid(x) -> Invalid(x, dena)) -> therefore Invalid(lucilia, dena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The megan prickle the hana. The megan prickle the sherie. The megan is nineteen. The megan alloy the hana. The megan alloy the sherie. The hana prickle the megan. The hana prickle the sherie. The hana is mongolian. The hana convene the megan. The hana convene the sherie. The hana alloy the sherie. The sherie is mongolian. The sherie is factious. The sherie convene the hana. The sherie alloy the megan. The sherie alloy the hana. If someone prickle the hana and they need the sherie then the hana prickle the megan. If someone is mexican and they chase the sherie then they need the megan. If someone convene the megan then they chase the hana. If someone prickle the hana and they see the hana then they need the sherie. Young, mongolian people are jilted. If someone prickle the megan and the megan convene the sherie then they are mongolian. If someone is jilted then they need the megan. If someone alloy the hana then the hana prickle the megan. The sherie does not need the megan.", "logic": "\nPrickle(megan, hana)\nPrickle(megan, sherie)\nNineteen(megan)\nAlloy(megan, hana)\nAlloy(megan, sherie)\nPrickle(hana, megan)\nPrickle(hana, sherie)\nMongolian(hana)\nConvene(hana, megan)\nConvene(hana, sherie)\nAlloy(hana, sherie)\nMongolian(sherie)\nFactious(sherie)\nConvene(sherie, hana)\nAlloy(sherie, megan)\nAlloy(sherie, hana)\nforall x (Prickle(x, hana) and Convene(x, sherie) -> Prickle(hana, megan))\nforall x (Mexican(x) and Prickle(x, sherie) -> Convene(x, megan))\nforall x (Convene(x, megan) -> Prickle(x, hana))\nforall x (Prickle(x, hana) and Alloy(x, hana) -> Convene(x, sherie))\nforall x (Factious(x) and Mongolian(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Prickle(x, megan) and Convene(megan, sherie) -> Mongolian(x))\nforall x (Jilted(x) -> Convene(x, megan))\nforall x (Alloy(x, hana) -> Prickle(hana, megan))\n\nnot Convene(sherie, megan)\n\nFactious(sherie) and Mongolian(sherie) and forall x (Factious(x) and Mongolian(x) -> Jilted(x)) -> therefore Jilted(sherie) Jilted(sherie) and forall x (Jilted(x) -> Convene(x, megan)) -> therefore Convene(sherie, megan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The patricio lave the wylie. The patricio lave the aida. The patricio is nonmetal. The patricio odorize the wylie. The patricio odorize the aida. The wylie lave the patricio. The wylie lave the aida. The wylie is ritenuto. The wylie rave the patricio. The wylie rave the aida. The wylie odorize the aida. The aida is ritenuto. The aida is phrenic. The aida rave the wylie. The aida odorize the patricio. The aida odorize the wylie. If someone lave the wylie and they need the aida then the wylie lave the patricio. If someone is muggy and they chase the aida then they need the patricio. If someone rave the patricio then they chase the wylie. If someone lave the wylie and they see the wylie then they need the aida. Young, ritenuto people are untimbered. If someone lave the patricio and the patricio rave the aida then they are ritenuto. If someone is untimbered then they need the patricio. If someone odorize the wylie then the wylie lave the patricio. The aida lave the wylie.", "logic": "\nLave(patricio, wylie)\nLave(patricio, aida)\nNonmetal(patricio)\nOdorize(patricio, wylie)\nOdorize(patricio, aida)\nLave(wylie, patricio)\nLave(wylie, aida)\nRitenuto(wylie)\nRave(wylie, patricio)\nRave(wylie, aida)\nOdorize(wylie, aida)\nRitenuto(aida)\nPhrenic(aida)\nRave(aida, wylie)\nOdorize(aida, patricio)\nOdorize(aida, wylie)\nforall x (Lave(x, wylie) and Rave(x, aida) -> Lave(wylie, patricio))\nforall x (Muggy(x) and Lave(x, aida) -> Rave(x, patricio))\nforall x (Rave(x, patricio) -> Lave(x, wylie))\nforall x (Lave(x, wylie) and Odorize(x, wylie) -> Rave(x, aida))\nforall x (Phrenic(x) and Ritenuto(x) -> Untimbered(x))\nforall x (Lave(x, patricio) and Rave(patricio, aida) -> Ritenuto(x))\nforall x (Untimbered(x) -> Rave(x, patricio))\nforall x (Odorize(x, wylie) -> Lave(wylie, patricio))\n\nLave(aida, wylie)\n\nPhrenic(aida) and Ritenuto(aida) and forall x (Phrenic(x) and Ritenuto(x) -> Untimbered(x)) -> therefore Untimbered(aida) Untimbered(aida) and forall x (Untimbered(x) -> Rave(x, patricio)) -> therefore Rave(aida, patricio) Rave(aida, patricio) and forall x (Rave(x, patricio) -> Lave(x, wylie)) -> therefore Lave(aida, wylie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The cindy mope the sophronia. The cindy mope the duffie. The cindy is bowing. The cindy causeway the sophronia. The cindy causeway the duffie. The sophronia mope the cindy. The sophronia mope the duffie. The sophronia is pardonable. The sophronia glance the cindy. The sophronia glance the duffie. The sophronia causeway the duffie. The duffie is pardonable. The duffie is coenobitic. The duffie glance the sophronia. The duffie causeway the cindy. The duffie causeway the sophronia. If someone mope the sophronia and they need the duffie then the sophronia mope the cindy. If someone is medullary and they chase the duffie then they need the cindy. If someone glance the cindy then they chase the sophronia. If someone mope the sophronia and they see the sophronia then they need the duffie. Young, pardonable people are carinate. If someone mope the cindy and the cindy glance the duffie then they are pardonable. If someone is carinate then they need the cindy. If someone causeway the sophronia then the sophronia mope the cindy. The duffie does not chase the sophronia.", "logic": "\nMope(cindy, sophronia)\nMope(cindy, duffie)\nBowing(cindy)\nCauseway(cindy, sophronia)\nCauseway(cindy, duffie)\nMope(sophronia, cindy)\nMope(sophronia, duffie)\nPardonable(sophronia)\nGlance(sophronia, cindy)\nGlance(sophronia, duffie)\nCauseway(sophronia, duffie)\nPardonable(duffie)\nCoenobitic(duffie)\nGlance(duffie, sophronia)\nCauseway(duffie, cindy)\nCauseway(duffie, sophronia)\nforall x (Mope(x, sophronia) and Glance(x, duffie) -> Mope(sophronia, cindy))\nforall x (Medullary(x) and Mope(x, duffie) -> Glance(x, cindy))\nforall x (Glance(x, cindy) -> Mope(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Mope(x, sophronia) and Causeway(x, sophronia) -> Glance(x, duffie))\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) and Pardonable(x) -> Carinate(x))\nforall x (Mope(x, cindy) and Glance(cindy, duffie) -> Pardonable(x))\nforall x (Carinate(x) -> Glance(x, cindy))\nforall x (Causeway(x, sophronia) -> Mope(sophronia, cindy))\n\nnot Mope(duffie, sophronia)\n\nCoenobitic(duffie) and Pardonable(duffie) and forall x (Coenobitic(x) and Pardonable(x) -> Carinate(x)) -> therefore Carinate(duffie) Carinate(duffie) and forall x (Carinate(x) -> Glance(x, cindy)) -> therefore Glance(duffie, cindy) Glance(duffie, cindy) and forall x (Glance(x, cindy) -> Mope(x, sophronia)) -> therefore Mope(duffie, sophronia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The xylina reissue the enrico. The xylina reissue the averell. The xylina is harnessed. The xylina mercerise the enrico. The xylina mercerise the averell. The enrico reissue the xylina. The enrico reissue the averell. The enrico is foremost. The enrico frost the xylina. The enrico frost the averell. The enrico mercerise the averell. The averell is foremost. The averell is insolvable. The averell frost the enrico. The averell mercerise the xylina. The averell mercerise the enrico. If someone reissue the enrico and they need the averell then the enrico reissue the xylina. If someone is grubby and they chase the averell then they need the xylina. If someone frost the xylina then they chase the enrico. If someone reissue the enrico and they see the enrico then they need the averell. Young, foremost people are stockinged. If someone reissue the xylina and the xylina frost the averell then they are foremost. If someone is stockinged then they need the xylina. If someone mercerise the enrico then the enrico reissue the xylina. The enrico is not stockinged.", "logic": "\nReissue(xylina, enrico)\nReissue(xylina, averell)\nHarnessed(xylina)\nMercerise(xylina, enrico)\nMercerise(xylina, averell)\nReissue(enrico, xylina)\nReissue(enrico, averell)\nForemost(enrico)\nFrost(enrico, xylina)\nFrost(enrico, averell)\nMercerise(enrico, averell)\nForemost(averell)\nInsolvable(averell)\nFrost(averell, enrico)\nMercerise(averell, xylina)\nMercerise(averell, enrico)\nforall x (Reissue(x, enrico) and Frost(x, averell) -> Reissue(enrico, xylina))\nforall x (Grubby(x) and Reissue(x, averell) -> Frost(x, xylina))\nforall x (Frost(x, xylina) -> Reissue(x, enrico))\nforall x (Reissue(x, enrico) and Mercerise(x, enrico) -> Frost(x, averell))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Foremost(x) -> Stockinged(x))\nforall x (Reissue(x, xylina) and Frost(xylina, averell) -> Foremost(x))\nforall x (Stockinged(x) -> Frost(x, xylina))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, enrico) -> Reissue(enrico, xylina))\n\nnot Stockinged(enrico)\n\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Foremost(x) -> Stockinged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The evelina faggot the rodie. The evelina faggot the tod. The evelina is incased. The evelina hectograph the rodie. The evelina hectograph the tod. The rodie faggot the evelina. The rodie faggot the tod. The rodie is mastered. The rodie ancylose the evelina. The rodie ancylose the tod. The rodie hectograph the tod. The tod is mastered. The tod is didactical. The tod ancylose the rodie. The tod hectograph the evelina. The tod hectograph the rodie. If someone faggot the rodie and they need the tod then the rodie faggot the evelina. If someone is monecious and they chase the tod then they need the evelina. If someone ancylose the evelina then they chase the rodie. If someone faggot the rodie and they see the rodie then they need the tod. Young, mastered people are parched. If someone faggot the evelina and the evelina ancylose the tod then they are mastered. If someone is parched then they need the evelina. If someone hectograph the rodie then the rodie faggot the evelina. The evelina ancylose the evelina.", "logic": "\nFaggot(evelina, rodie)\nFaggot(evelina, tod)\nIncased(evelina)\nHectograph(evelina, rodie)\nHectograph(evelina, tod)\nFaggot(rodie, evelina)\nFaggot(rodie, tod)\nMastered(rodie)\nAncylose(rodie, evelina)\nAncylose(rodie, tod)\nHectograph(rodie, tod)\nMastered(tod)\nDidactical(tod)\nAncylose(tod, rodie)\nHectograph(tod, evelina)\nHectograph(tod, rodie)\nforall x (Faggot(x, rodie) and Ancylose(x, tod) -> Faggot(rodie, evelina))\nforall x (Monecious(x) and Faggot(x, tod) -> Ancylose(x, evelina))\nforall x (Ancylose(x, evelina) -> Faggot(x, rodie))\nforall x (Faggot(x, rodie) and Hectograph(x, rodie) -> Ancylose(x, tod))\nforall x (Didactical(x) and Mastered(x) -> Parched(x))\nforall x (Faggot(x, evelina) and Ancylose(evelina, tod) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Parched(x) -> Ancylose(x, evelina))\nforall x (Hectograph(x, rodie) -> Faggot(rodie, evelina))\n\nAncylose(evelina, evelina)\n\nforall x (Parched(x) -> Ancylose(x, evelina)) <- forall x (Didactical(x) and Mastered(x) -> Parched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The brandise aviate the humbert. The brandise aviate the kirby. The brandise is indignant. The brandise boob the humbert. The brandise boob the kirby. The humbert aviate the brandise. The humbert aviate the kirby. The humbert is congenial. The humbert effect the brandise. The humbert effect the kirby. The humbert boob the kirby. The kirby is congenial. The kirby is juridical. The kirby effect the humbert. The kirby boob the brandise. The kirby boob the humbert. If someone aviate the humbert and they need the kirby then the humbert aviate the brandise. If someone is unshaped and they chase the kirby then they need the brandise. If someone effect the brandise then they chase the humbert. If someone aviate the humbert and they see the humbert then they need the kirby. Young, congenial people are such. If someone aviate the brandise and the brandise effect the kirby then they are congenial. If someone is such then they need the brandise. If someone boob the humbert then the humbert aviate the brandise. The brandise is not such.", "logic": "\nAviate(brandise, humbert)\nAviate(brandise, kirby)\nIndignant(brandise)\nBoob(brandise, humbert)\nBoob(brandise, kirby)\nAviate(humbert, brandise)\nAviate(humbert, kirby)\nCongenial(humbert)\nEffect(humbert, brandise)\nEffect(humbert, kirby)\nBoob(humbert, kirby)\nCongenial(kirby)\nJuridical(kirby)\nEffect(kirby, humbert)\nBoob(kirby, brandise)\nBoob(kirby, humbert)\nforall x (Aviate(x, humbert) and Effect(x, kirby) -> Aviate(humbert, brandise))\nforall x (Unshaped(x) and Aviate(x, kirby) -> Effect(x, brandise))\nforall x (Effect(x, brandise) -> Aviate(x, humbert))\nforall x (Aviate(x, humbert) and Boob(x, humbert) -> Effect(x, kirby))\nforall x (Juridical(x) and Congenial(x) -> Such(x))\nforall x (Aviate(x, brandise) and Effect(brandise, kirby) -> Congenial(x))\nforall x (Such(x) -> Effect(x, brandise))\nforall x (Boob(x, humbert) -> Aviate(humbert, brandise))\n\nnot Such(brandise)\n\nforall x (Juridical(x) and Congenial(x) -> Such(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The virginia sleuth the odette. The virginia sleuth the brewster. The virginia is thermal. The virginia normalise the odette. The virginia normalise the brewster. The odette sleuth the virginia. The odette sleuth the brewster. The odette is plutonic. The odette inculpate the virginia. The odette inculpate the brewster. The odette normalise the brewster. The brewster is plutonic. The brewster is bibless. The brewster inculpate the odette. The brewster normalise the virginia. The brewster normalise the odette. If someone sleuth the odette and they need the brewster then the odette sleuth the virginia. If someone is purblind and they chase the brewster then they need the virginia. If someone inculpate the virginia then they chase the odette. If someone sleuth the odette and they see the odette then they need the brewster. Young, plutonic people are crocked. If someone sleuth the virginia and the virginia inculpate the brewster then they are plutonic. If someone is crocked then they need the virginia. If someone normalise the odette then the odette sleuth the virginia. The virginia is plutonic.", "logic": "\nSleuth(virginia, odette)\nSleuth(virginia, brewster)\nThermal(virginia)\nNormalise(virginia, odette)\nNormalise(virginia, brewster)\nSleuth(odette, virginia)\nSleuth(odette, brewster)\nPlutonic(odette)\nInculpate(odette, virginia)\nInculpate(odette, brewster)\nNormalise(odette, brewster)\nPlutonic(brewster)\nBibless(brewster)\nInculpate(brewster, odette)\nNormalise(brewster, virginia)\nNormalise(brewster, odette)\nforall x (Sleuth(x, odette) and Inculpate(x, brewster) -> Sleuth(odette, virginia))\nforall x (Purblind(x) and Sleuth(x, brewster) -> Inculpate(x, virginia))\nforall x (Inculpate(x, virginia) -> Sleuth(x, odette))\nforall x (Sleuth(x, odette) and Normalise(x, odette) -> Inculpate(x, brewster))\nforall x (Bibless(x) and Plutonic(x) -> Crocked(x))\nforall x (Sleuth(x, virginia) and Inculpate(virginia, brewster) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Crocked(x) -> Inculpate(x, virginia))\nforall x (Normalise(x, odette) -> Sleuth(odette, virginia))\n\nPlutonic(virginia)\n\nforall x (Sleuth(x, virginia) and Inculpate(virginia, brewster) -> Plutonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The shaun oxidise the georg. The shaun oxidise the murdock. The shaun is perineal. The shaun hill the georg. The shaun hill the murdock. The georg oxidise the shaun. The georg oxidise the murdock. The georg is doped. The georg learn the shaun. The georg learn the murdock. The georg hill the murdock. The murdock is doped. The murdock is shrunken. The murdock learn the georg. The murdock hill the shaun. The murdock hill the georg. If someone oxidise the georg and they need the murdock then the georg oxidise the shaun. If someone is tangible and they chase the murdock then they need the shaun. If someone learn the shaun then they chase the georg. If someone oxidise the georg and they see the georg then they need the murdock. Young, doped people are municipal. If someone oxidise the shaun and the shaun learn the murdock then they are doped. If someone is municipal then they need the shaun. If someone hill the georg then the georg oxidise the shaun. The shaun does not see the shaun.", "logic": "\nOxidise(shaun, georg)\nOxidise(shaun, murdock)\nPerineal(shaun)\nHill(shaun, georg)\nHill(shaun, murdock)\nOxidise(georg, shaun)\nOxidise(georg, murdock)\nDoped(georg)\nLearn(georg, shaun)\nLearn(georg, murdock)\nHill(georg, murdock)\nDoped(murdock)\nShrunken(murdock)\nLearn(murdock, georg)\nHill(murdock, shaun)\nHill(murdock, georg)\nforall x (Oxidise(x, georg) and Learn(x, murdock) -> Oxidise(georg, shaun))\nforall x (Tangible(x) and Oxidise(x, murdock) -> Learn(x, shaun))\nforall x (Learn(x, shaun) -> Oxidise(x, georg))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, georg) and Hill(x, georg) -> Learn(x, murdock))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) and Doped(x) -> Municipal(x))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, shaun) and Learn(shaun, murdock) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Municipal(x) -> Learn(x, shaun))\nforall x (Hill(x, georg) -> Oxidise(georg, shaun))\n\nnot Hill(shaun, shaun)\n\nnot Hill(shaun, shaun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The marissa relocate the isis. The marissa relocate the brigit. The marissa is miotic. The marissa diddle the isis. The marissa diddle the brigit. The isis relocate the marissa. The isis relocate the brigit. The isis is marginal. The isis sniff the marissa. The isis sniff the brigit. The isis diddle the brigit. The brigit is marginal. The brigit is unequaled. The brigit sniff the isis. The brigit diddle the marissa. The brigit diddle the isis. If someone relocate the isis and they need the brigit then the isis relocate the marissa. If someone is wintery and they chase the brigit then they need the marissa. If someone sniff the marissa then they chase the isis. If someone relocate the isis and they see the isis then they need the brigit. Young, marginal people are antitumor. If someone relocate the marissa and the marissa sniff the brigit then they are marginal. If someone is antitumor then they need the marissa. If someone diddle the isis then the isis relocate the marissa. The marissa is unequaled.", "logic": "\nRelocate(marissa, isis)\nRelocate(marissa, brigit)\nMiotic(marissa)\nDiddle(marissa, isis)\nDiddle(marissa, brigit)\nRelocate(isis, marissa)\nRelocate(isis, brigit)\nMarginal(isis)\nSniff(isis, marissa)\nSniff(isis, brigit)\nDiddle(isis, brigit)\nMarginal(brigit)\nUnequaled(brigit)\nSniff(brigit, isis)\nDiddle(brigit, marissa)\nDiddle(brigit, isis)\nforall x (Relocate(x, isis) and Sniff(x, brigit) -> Relocate(isis, marissa))\nforall x (Wintery(x) and Relocate(x, brigit) -> Sniff(x, marissa))\nforall x (Sniff(x, marissa) -> Relocate(x, isis))\nforall x (Relocate(x, isis) and Diddle(x, isis) -> Sniff(x, brigit))\nforall x (Unequaled(x) and Marginal(x) -> Antitumor(x))\nforall x (Relocate(x, marissa) and Sniff(marissa, brigit) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) -> Sniff(x, marissa))\nforall x (Diddle(x, isis) -> Relocate(isis, marissa))\n\nUnequaled(marissa)\n\nUnequaled(marissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The avrit cheese the laure. The avrit cheese the julianne. The avrit is acapnotic. The avrit moderate the laure. The avrit moderate the julianne. The laure cheese the avrit. The laure cheese the julianne. The laure is venal. The laure cleave the avrit. The laure cleave the julianne. The laure moderate the julianne. The julianne is venal. The julianne is pilar. The julianne cleave the laure. The julianne moderate the avrit. The julianne moderate the laure. If someone cheese the laure and they need the julianne then the laure cheese the avrit. If someone is slimy and they chase the julianne then they need the avrit. If someone cleave the avrit then they chase the laure. If someone cheese the laure and they see the laure then they need the julianne. Young, venal people are disfigured. If someone cheese the avrit and the avrit cleave the julianne then they are venal. If someone is disfigured then they need the avrit. If someone moderate the laure then the laure cheese the avrit. The avrit is not slimy.", "logic": "\nCheese(avrit, laure)\nCheese(avrit, julianne)\nAcapnotic(avrit)\nModerate(avrit, laure)\nModerate(avrit, julianne)\nCheese(laure, avrit)\nCheese(laure, julianne)\nVenal(laure)\nCleave(laure, avrit)\nCleave(laure, julianne)\nModerate(laure, julianne)\nVenal(julianne)\nPilar(julianne)\nCleave(julianne, laure)\nModerate(julianne, avrit)\nModerate(julianne, laure)\nforall x (Cheese(x, laure) and Cleave(x, julianne) -> Cheese(laure, avrit))\nforall x (Slimy(x) and Cheese(x, julianne) -> Cleave(x, avrit))\nforall x (Cleave(x, avrit) -> Cheese(x, laure))\nforall x (Cheese(x, laure) and Moderate(x, laure) -> Cleave(x, julianne))\nforall x (Pilar(x) and Venal(x) -> Disfigured(x))\nforall x (Cheese(x, avrit) and Cleave(avrit, julianne) -> Venal(x))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) -> Cleave(x, avrit))\nforall x (Moderate(x, laure) -> Cheese(laure, avrit))\n\nnot Slimy(avrit)\n\nnot Slimy(avrit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The loree roughhouse the ailey. The loree roughhouse the ramonda. The loree is hungry. The loree vinify the ailey. The loree vinify the ramonda. The ailey roughhouse the loree. The ailey roughhouse the ramonda. The ailey is bruising. The ailey unlive the loree. The ailey unlive the ramonda. The ailey vinify the ramonda. The ramonda is bruising. The ramonda is regal. The ramonda unlive the ailey. The ramonda vinify the loree. The ramonda vinify the ailey. If someone roughhouse the ailey and they need the ramonda then the ailey roughhouse the loree. If someone is strict and they chase the ramonda then they need the loree. If someone unlive the loree then they chase the ailey. If someone roughhouse the ailey and they see the ailey then they need the ramonda. Young, bruising people are delicious. If someone roughhouse the loree and the loree unlive the ramonda then they are bruising. If someone is delicious then they need the loree. If someone vinify the ailey then the ailey roughhouse the loree. The ramonda is strict.", "logic": "\nRoughhouse(loree, ailey)\nRoughhouse(loree, ramonda)\nHungry(loree)\nVinify(loree, ailey)\nVinify(loree, ramonda)\nRoughhouse(ailey, loree)\nRoughhouse(ailey, ramonda)\nBruising(ailey)\nUnlive(ailey, loree)\nUnlive(ailey, ramonda)\nVinify(ailey, ramonda)\nBruising(ramonda)\nRegal(ramonda)\nUnlive(ramonda, ailey)\nVinify(ramonda, loree)\nVinify(ramonda, ailey)\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, ailey) and Unlive(x, ramonda) -> Roughhouse(ailey, loree))\nforall x (Strict(x) and Roughhouse(x, ramonda) -> Unlive(x, loree))\nforall x (Unlive(x, loree) -> Roughhouse(x, ailey))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, ailey) and Vinify(x, ailey) -> Unlive(x, ramonda))\nforall x (Regal(x) and Bruising(x) -> Delicious(x))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, loree) and Unlive(loree, ramonda) -> Bruising(x))\nforall x (Delicious(x) -> Unlive(x, loree))\nforall x (Vinify(x, ailey) -> Roughhouse(ailey, loree))\n\nStrict(ramonda)\n\nStrict(ramonda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "Ellie is extropic. Jaleh is unattached. Jaleh is national. Jaleh is corrosive. Urbanus is unattached. Urbanus is national. Urbanus is sane. If someone is corrosive then they are extropic. If someone is unattached and corrosive then they are extropic. If someone is corrosive then they are extropic. Big people are corrosive. If someone is haploidic then they are corrosive. If someone is extropic then they are haploidic. Urbanus is national.", "logic": "\nExtropic(ellie)\nUnattached(jaleh)\nNational(jaleh)\nCorrosive(jaleh)\nUnattached(urbanus)\nNational(urbanus)\nSane(urbanus)\nforall x (Corrosive(x) -> Extropic(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and Corrosive(x) -> Extropic(x))\nforall x (Corrosive(x) -> Extropic(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Extropic(x) -> Haploidic(x))\n\nNational(urbanus)\n\ntherefore National(urbanus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Meredith is caulescent. Gale is hardbound. Gale is ammoniated. Gale is bimetallic. Jules is hardbound. Jules is ammoniated. Jules is tumescent. If someone is bimetallic then they are caulescent. If someone is hardbound and bimetallic then they are caulescent. If someone is bimetallic then they are caulescent. Big people are bimetallic. If someone is high then they are bimetallic. If someone is caulescent then they are high. Jules is not ammoniated.", "logic": "\nCaulescent(meredith)\nHardbound(gale)\nAmmoniated(gale)\nBimetallic(gale)\nHardbound(jules)\nAmmoniated(jules)\nTumescent(jules)\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) and Bimetallic(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) -> Bimetallic(x))\nforall x (High(x) -> Bimetallic(x))\nforall x (Caulescent(x) -> High(x))\n\nnot Ammoniated(jules)\n\ntherefore Ammoniated(jules)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Andrus is rubberlike. Leese is unsecured. Leese is unlabelled. Leese is accidental. Liam is unsecured. Liam is unlabelled. Liam is felted. If someone is accidental then they are rubberlike. If someone is unsecured and accidental then they are rubberlike. If someone is accidental then they are rubberlike. Big people are accidental. If someone is blimpish then they are accidental. If someone is rubberlike then they are blimpish. Liam is accidental.", "logic": "\nRubberlike(andrus)\nUnsecured(leese)\nUnlabelled(leese)\nAccidental(leese)\nUnsecured(liam)\nUnlabelled(liam)\nFelted(liam)\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Rubberlike(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) and Accidental(x) -> Rubberlike(x))\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Rubberlike(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) -> Accidental(x))\nforall x (Blimpish(x) -> Accidental(x))\nforall x (Rubberlike(x) -> Blimpish(x))\n\nAccidental(liam)\n\nUnsecured(liam) and forall x (Unsecured(x) -> Accidental(x)) -> therefore Accidental(liam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Aliza is formed. Emalee is denary. Emalee is resinated. Emalee is propulsive. Deanna is denary. Deanna is resinated. Deanna is anorectal. If someone is propulsive then they are formed. If someone is denary and propulsive then they are formed. If someone is propulsive then they are formed. Big people are propulsive. If someone is protanopic then they are propulsive. If someone is formed then they are protanopic. Deanna is not propulsive.", "logic": "\nFormed(aliza)\nDenary(emalee)\nResinated(emalee)\nPropulsive(emalee)\nDenary(deanna)\nResinated(deanna)\nAnorectal(deanna)\nforall x (Propulsive(x) -> Formed(x))\nforall x (Denary(x) and Propulsive(x) -> Formed(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) -> Formed(x))\nforall x (Denary(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Protanopic(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Formed(x) -> Protanopic(x))\n\nnot Propulsive(deanna)\n\nDenary(deanna) and forall x (Denary(x) -> Propulsive(x)) -> therefore Propulsive(deanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Reggy is jerkwater. Kirsten is resinlike. Kirsten is stalwart. Kirsten is dependent. Herta is resinlike. Herta is stalwart. Herta is overdone. If someone is dependent then they are jerkwater. If someone is resinlike and dependent then they are jerkwater. If someone is dependent then they are jerkwater. Big people are dependent. If someone is acarpous then they are dependent. If someone is jerkwater then they are acarpous. Kirsten is acarpous.", "logic": "\nJerkwater(reggy)\nResinlike(kirsten)\nStalwart(kirsten)\nDependent(kirsten)\nResinlike(herta)\nStalwart(herta)\nOverdone(herta)\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and Dependent(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Acarpous(x))\n\nAcarpous(kirsten)\n\nDependent(kirsten) and forall x (Dependent(x) -> Jerkwater(x)) -> therefore Jerkwater(kirsten) Jerkwater(kirsten) and forall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Acarpous(x)) -> therefore Acarpous(kirsten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Clair is cisalpine. Elladine is preanal. Elladine is landscaped. Elladine is tainted. Gwenn is preanal. Gwenn is landscaped. Gwenn is poetic. If someone is tainted then they are cisalpine. If someone is preanal and tainted then they are cisalpine. If someone is tainted then they are cisalpine. Big people are tainted. If someone is toeless then they are tainted. If someone is cisalpine then they are toeless. Clair is not tainted.", "logic": "\nCisalpine(clair)\nPreanal(elladine)\nLandscaped(elladine)\nTainted(elladine)\nPreanal(gwenn)\nLandscaped(gwenn)\nPoetic(gwenn)\nforall x (Tainted(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) and Tainted(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Tainted(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Tainted(x))\nforall x (Toeless(x) -> Tainted(x))\nforall x (Cisalpine(x) -> Toeless(x))\n\nnot Tainted(clair)\n\nCisalpine(clair) and forall x (Cisalpine(x) -> Toeless(x)) -> therefore Toeless(clair) Toeless(clair) and forall x (Toeless(x) -> Tainted(x)) -> therefore Tainted(clair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Ronda is sceptred. Nester is rear. Nester is crookback. Nester is oviform. Pattie is rear. Pattie is crookback. Pattie is economical. If someone is oviform then they are sceptred. If someone is rear and oviform then they are sceptred. If someone is oviform then they are sceptred. Big people are oviform. If someone is secret then they are oviform. If someone is sceptred then they are secret. Pattie is secret.", "logic": "\nSceptred(ronda)\nRear(nester)\nCrookback(nester)\nOviform(nester)\nRear(pattie)\nCrookback(pattie)\nEconomical(pattie)\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Rear(x) and Oviform(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Oviform(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) -> Oviform(x))\nforall x (Sceptred(x) -> Secret(x))\n\nSecret(pattie)\n\nRear(pattie) and forall x (Rear(x) -> Oviform(x)) -> therefore Oviform(pattie) Oviform(pattie) and forall x (Oviform(x) -> Sceptred(x)) -> therefore Sceptred(pattie) Sceptred(pattie) and forall x (Sceptred(x) -> Secret(x)) -> therefore Secret(pattie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Rahal is tubercular. Cabrina is brittle. Cabrina is blistering. Cabrina is pronged. Justin is brittle. Justin is blistering. Justin is surpassing. If someone is pronged then they are tubercular. If someone is brittle and pronged then they are tubercular. If someone is pronged then they are tubercular. Big people are pronged. If someone is changing then they are pronged. If someone is tubercular then they are changing. Justin is not changing.", "logic": "\nTubercular(rahal)\nBrittle(cabrina)\nBlistering(cabrina)\nPronged(cabrina)\nBrittle(justin)\nBlistering(justin)\nSurpassing(justin)\nforall x (Pronged(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Brittle(x) and Pronged(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Pronged(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Brittle(x) -> Pronged(x))\nforall x (Changing(x) -> Pronged(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) -> Changing(x))\n\nnot Changing(justin)\n\nBrittle(justin) and forall x (Brittle(x) -> Pronged(x)) -> therefore Pronged(justin) Pronged(justin) and forall x (Pronged(x) -> Tubercular(x)) -> therefore Tubercular(justin) Tubercular(justin) and forall x (Tubercular(x) -> Changing(x)) -> therefore Changing(justin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Lorrin is aloof. Atlanta is bearded. Atlanta is unanalyzed. Atlanta is grotty. Aila is bearded. Aila is unanalyzed. Aila is nominative. If someone is grotty then they are aloof. If someone is bearded and grotty then they are aloof. If someone is grotty then they are aloof. Big people are grotty. If someone is kafkaesque then they are grotty. If someone is aloof then they are kafkaesque. Atlanta is not blue.", "logic": "\nAloof(lorrin)\nBearded(atlanta)\nUnanalyzed(atlanta)\nGrotty(atlanta)\nBearded(aila)\nUnanalyzed(aila)\nNominative(aila)\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Bearded(x) and Grotty(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Bearded(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\n\nnot Blue(atlanta)\n\nnot Blue(atlanta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Alberta is pocked. Oliy is learned. Oliy is biloculate. Oliy is courteous. Elisha is learned. Elisha is biloculate. Elisha is oleaceous. If someone is courteous then they are pocked. If someone is learned and courteous then they are pocked. If someone is courteous then they are pocked. Big people are courteous. If someone is diagonal then they are courteous. If someone is pocked then they are diagonal. Oliy is oleaceous.", "logic": "\nPocked(alberta)\nLearned(oliy)\nBiloculate(oliy)\nCourteous(oliy)\nLearned(elisha)\nBiloculate(elisha)\nOleaceous(elisha)\nforall x (Courteous(x) -> Pocked(x))\nforall x (Learned(x) and Courteous(x) -> Pocked(x))\nforall x (Courteous(x) -> Pocked(x))\nforall x (Learned(x) -> Courteous(x))\nforall x (Diagonal(x) -> Courteous(x))\nforall x (Pocked(x) -> Diagonal(x))\n\nOleaceous(oliy)\n\nOleaceous(oliy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Justin is bungaloid. Jemie is overall. Jemie is asynergic. Jemie is unaware. Marijo is overall. Marijo is asynergic. Marijo is proficient. If someone is unaware then they are bungaloid. If someone is overall and unaware then they are bungaloid. If someone is unaware then they are bungaloid. Big people are unaware. If someone is airlike then they are unaware. If someone is bungaloid then they are airlike. Justin is not blue.", "logic": "\nBungaloid(justin)\nOverall(jemie)\nAsynergic(jemie)\nUnaware(jemie)\nOverall(marijo)\nAsynergic(marijo)\nProficient(marijo)\nforall x (Unaware(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Overall(x) and Unaware(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Unaware(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Overall(x) -> Unaware(x))\nforall x (Airlike(x) -> Unaware(x))\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) -> Airlike(x))\n\nnot Blue(justin)\n\nnot Blue(justin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Rivkah is confluent. Rayna is horrendous. Rayna is chartreuse. Rayna is sage. Kori is horrendous. Kori is chartreuse. Kori is unsheared. If someone is sage then they are confluent. If someone is horrendous and sage then they are confluent. If someone is sage then they are confluent. Big people are sage. If someone is quizzical then they are sage. If someone is confluent then they are quizzical. Rivkah is unsheared.", "logic": "\nConfluent(rivkah)\nHorrendous(rayna)\nChartreuse(rayna)\nSage(rayna)\nHorrendous(kori)\nChartreuse(kori)\nUnsheared(kori)\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Confluent(x))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) and Sage(x) -> Confluent(x))\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Confluent(x))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Sage(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> Sage(x))\nforall x (Confluent(x) -> Quizzical(x))\n\nUnsheared(rivkah)\n\nUnsheared(rivkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Leshia is vehicular. Theda is tangerine. Theda is looking. Theda is sleeved. Colleen is tangerine. Colleen is looking. Colleen is indian. If someone is sleeved then they are vehicular. If someone is tangerine and sleeved then they are vehicular. If someone is sleeved then they are vehicular. Big people are sleeved. If someone is sluicing then they are sleeved. If someone is vehicular then they are sluicing. Colleen is not blue.", "logic": "\nVehicular(leshia)\nTangerine(theda)\nLooking(theda)\nSleeved(theda)\nTangerine(colleen)\nLooking(colleen)\nIndian(colleen)\nforall x (Sleeved(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Tangerine(x) and Sleeved(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Sleeved(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Tangerine(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Sluicing(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) -> Sluicing(x))\n\nnot Blue(colleen)\n\nnot Blue(colleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Charyl is defunct. Gabbey is withdrawn. Gabbey is cyanogenic. Gabbey is pentagonal. Brooke is withdrawn. Brooke is cyanogenic. Brooke is elemental. If someone is pentagonal then they are defunct. If someone is withdrawn and pentagonal then they are defunct. If someone is pentagonal then they are defunct. Big people are pentagonal. If someone is distaff then they are pentagonal. If someone is defunct then they are distaff. Charyl is withdrawn.", "logic": "\nDefunct(charyl)\nWithdrawn(gabbey)\nCyanogenic(gabbey)\nPentagonal(gabbey)\nWithdrawn(brooke)\nCyanogenic(brooke)\nElemental(brooke)\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Withdrawn(x) and Pentagonal(x) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Withdrawn(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Defunct(x) -> Distaff(x))\n\nWithdrawn(charyl)\n\nWithdrawn(charyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Shaw is extant. Shaw is hundredth. Shaw is adipose. Shaw is upstanding. Shaw is abashed. Shaw is corporal. Jeramie is extant. Sol is extant. Sol is upstanding. Sol is abashed. If someone is extant and not upstanding then they are hundredth. Green, corporal people are hundredth. If Sol is extant and Sol is corporal then Sol is soignee. All upstanding people are corporal. If someone is soignee and not upstanding then they are abashed. Big people are abashed. If someone is corporal and not hundredth then they are abashed. All abashed people are adipose. Sol is extant.", "logic": "\nExtant(shaw)\nHundredth(shaw)\nAdipose(shaw)\nUpstanding(shaw)\nAbashed(shaw)\nCorporal(shaw)\nExtant(jeramie)\nExtant(sol)\nUpstanding(sol)\nAbashed(sol)\nforall x (Extant(x) and not Upstanding(x) -> Hundredth(x))\nforall x (Soignee(x) and Corporal(x) -> Hundredth(x))\nExtant(sol) and Corporal(sol) -> Soignee(sol)\nforall x (Upstanding(x) -> Corporal(x))\nforall x (Soignee(x) and not Upstanding(x) -> Abashed(x))\nforall x (Extant(x) -> Abashed(x))\nforall x (Corporal(x) and not Hundredth(x) -> Abashed(x))\nforall x (Abashed(x) -> Adipose(x))\n\nExtant(sol)\n\ntherefore Extant(sol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Morris is austere. Morris is haemic. Morris is stimulated. Morris is denudate. Morris is famous. Morris is monochrome. Daisi is austere. Harrie is austere. Harrie is denudate. Harrie is famous. If someone is austere and not denudate then they are haemic. Green, monochrome people are haemic. If Harrie is austere and Harrie is monochrome then Harrie is watered. All denudate people are monochrome. If someone is watered and not denudate then they are famous. Big people are famous. If someone is monochrome and not haemic then they are famous. All famous people are stimulated. Harrie is not denudate.", "logic": "\nAustere(morris)\nHaemic(morris)\nStimulated(morris)\nDenudate(morris)\nFamous(morris)\nMonochrome(morris)\nAustere(daisi)\nAustere(harrie)\nDenudate(harrie)\nFamous(harrie)\nforall x (Austere(x) and not Denudate(x) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) and Monochrome(x) -> Haemic(x))\nAustere(harrie) and Monochrome(harrie) -> Watered(harrie)\nforall x (Denudate(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) and not Denudate(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Austere(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) and not Haemic(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Stimulated(x))\n\nnot Denudate(harrie)\n\ntherefore Denudate(harrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Paloma is silky. Paloma is bipedal. Paloma is pleading. Paloma is chilly. Paloma is homosexual. Paloma is nippy. Skye is silky. Janel is silky. Janel is chilly. Janel is homosexual. If someone is silky and not chilly then they are bipedal. Green, nippy people are bipedal. If Janel is silky and Janel is nippy then Janel is reformist. All chilly people are nippy. If someone is reformist and not chilly then they are homosexual. Big people are homosexual. If someone is nippy and not bipedal then they are homosexual. All homosexual people are pleading. Skye is homosexual.", "logic": "\nSilky(paloma)\nBipedal(paloma)\nPleading(paloma)\nChilly(paloma)\nHomosexual(paloma)\nNippy(paloma)\nSilky(skye)\nSilky(janel)\nChilly(janel)\nHomosexual(janel)\nforall x (Silky(x) and not Chilly(x) -> Bipedal(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) and Nippy(x) -> Bipedal(x))\nSilky(janel) and Nippy(janel) -> Reformist(janel)\nforall x (Chilly(x) -> Nippy(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) and not Chilly(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Nippy(x) and not Bipedal(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Pleading(x))\n\nHomosexual(skye)\n\nSilky(skye) and forall x (Silky(x) -> Homosexual(x)) -> therefore Homosexual(skye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Melessa is overlooked. Melessa is burrlike. Melessa is ladylike. Melessa is volumed. Melessa is lenten. Melessa is sodden. Dianne is overlooked. Ursola is overlooked. Ursola is volumed. Ursola is lenten. If someone is overlooked and not volumed then they are burrlike. Green, sodden people are burrlike. If Ursola is overlooked and Ursola is sodden then Ursola is evidenced. All volumed people are sodden. If someone is evidenced and not volumed then they are lenten. Big people are lenten. If someone is sodden and not burrlike then they are lenten. All lenten people are ladylike. Ursola is not sodden.", "logic": "\nOverlooked(melessa)\nBurrlike(melessa)\nLadylike(melessa)\nVolumed(melessa)\nLenten(melessa)\nSodden(melessa)\nOverlooked(dianne)\nOverlooked(ursola)\nVolumed(ursola)\nLenten(ursola)\nforall x (Overlooked(x) and not Volumed(x) -> Burrlike(x))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) and Sodden(x) -> Burrlike(x))\nOverlooked(ursola) and Sodden(ursola) -> Evidenced(ursola)\nforall x (Volumed(x) -> Sodden(x))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) and not Volumed(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Overlooked(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Sodden(x) and not Burrlike(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) -> Ladylike(x))\n\nnot Sodden(ursola)\n\nVolumed(ursola) and forall x (Volumed(x) -> Sodden(x)) -> therefore Sodden(ursola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Phillip is diluted. Phillip is uremic. Phillip is second. Phillip is panicky. Phillip is covalent. Phillip is mechanical. Mylo is diluted. Ophelie is diluted. Ophelie is panicky. Ophelie is covalent. If someone is diluted and not panicky then they are uremic. Green, mechanical people are uremic. If Ophelie is diluted and Ophelie is mechanical then Ophelie is unequalled. All panicky people are mechanical. If someone is unequalled and not panicky then they are covalent. Big people are covalent. If someone is mechanical and not uremic then they are covalent. All covalent people are second. Ophelie is unequalled.", "logic": "\nDiluted(phillip)\nUremic(phillip)\nSecond(phillip)\nPanicky(phillip)\nCovalent(phillip)\nMechanical(phillip)\nDiluted(mylo)\nDiluted(ophelie)\nPanicky(ophelie)\nCovalent(ophelie)\nforall x (Diluted(x) and not Panicky(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Unequalled(x) and Mechanical(x) -> Uremic(x))\nDiluted(ophelie) and Mechanical(ophelie) -> Unequalled(ophelie)\nforall x (Panicky(x) -> Mechanical(x))\nforall x (Unequalled(x) and not Panicky(x) -> Covalent(x))\nforall x (Diluted(x) -> Covalent(x))\nforall x (Mechanical(x) and not Uremic(x) -> Covalent(x))\nforall x (Covalent(x) -> Second(x))\n\nUnequalled(ophelie)\n\nPanicky(ophelie) and forall x (Panicky(x) -> Mechanical(x)) -> therefore Mechanical(ophelie) Diluted(ophelie) and Mechanical(ophelie) and Diluted(ophelie) and Mechanical(ophelie) -> Unequalled(ophelie) -> therefore Unequalled(ophelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Rosmunda is undeniable. Rosmunda is holy. Rosmunda is embolic. Rosmunda is outer. Rosmunda is sumptuous. Rosmunda is swayback. Siobhan is undeniable. Reynold is undeniable. Reynold is outer. Reynold is sumptuous. If someone is undeniable and not outer then they are holy. Green, swayback people are holy. If Reynold is undeniable and Reynold is swayback then Reynold is confucian. All outer people are swayback. If someone is confucian and not outer then they are sumptuous. Big people are sumptuous. If someone is swayback and not holy then they are sumptuous. All sumptuous people are embolic. Siobhan is not embolic.", "logic": "\nUndeniable(rosmunda)\nHoly(rosmunda)\nEmbolic(rosmunda)\nOuter(rosmunda)\nSumptuous(rosmunda)\nSwayback(rosmunda)\nUndeniable(siobhan)\nUndeniable(reynold)\nOuter(reynold)\nSumptuous(reynold)\nforall x (Undeniable(x) and not Outer(x) -> Holy(x))\nforall x (Confucian(x) and Swayback(x) -> Holy(x))\nUndeniable(reynold) and Swayback(reynold) -> Confucian(reynold)\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Confucian(x) and not Outer(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Swayback(x) and not Holy(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Embolic(x))\n\nnot Embolic(siobhan)\n\nUndeniable(siobhan) and forall x (Undeniable(x) -> Sumptuous(x)) -> therefore Sumptuous(siobhan) Sumptuous(siobhan) and forall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Embolic(x)) -> therefore Embolic(siobhan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Caresa is majuscule. Caresa is marxist. Caresa is nitric. Caresa is beamish. Caresa is stellate. Caresa is regal. Liuka is majuscule. Weber is majuscule. Weber is beamish. Weber is stellate. If someone is majuscule and not beamish then they are marxist. Green, regal people are marxist. If Weber is majuscule and Weber is regal then Weber is alto. All beamish people are regal. If someone is alto and not beamish then they are stellate. Big people are stellate. If someone is regal and not marxist then they are stellate. All stellate people are nitric. Weber is marxist.", "logic": "\nMajuscule(caresa)\nMarxist(caresa)\nNitric(caresa)\nBeamish(caresa)\nStellate(caresa)\nRegal(caresa)\nMajuscule(liuka)\nMajuscule(weber)\nBeamish(weber)\nStellate(weber)\nforall x (Majuscule(x) and not Beamish(x) -> Marxist(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) and Regal(x) -> Marxist(x))\nMajuscule(weber) and Regal(weber) -> Alto(weber)\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> Regal(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) and not Beamish(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Majuscule(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Regal(x) and not Marxist(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Nitric(x))\n\nMarxist(weber)\n\nBeamish(weber) and forall x (Beamish(x) -> Regal(x)) -> therefore Regal(weber) Majuscule(weber) and Regal(weber) and Majuscule(weber) and Regal(weber) -> Alto(weber) -> therefore Alto(weber) Beamish(weber) and forall x (Beamish(x) -> Regal(x)) -> therefore Regal(weber) Alto(weber) and Regal(weber) and forall x (Alto(x) and Regal(x) -> Marxist(x)) -> therefore Marxist(weber)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Aguinaldo is amort. Aguinaldo is composed. Aguinaldo is cervical. Aguinaldo is javanese. Aguinaldo is stygian. Aguinaldo is checked. Lucien is amort. Valenka is amort. Valenka is javanese. Valenka is stygian. If someone is amort and not javanese then they are composed. Green, checked people are composed. If Valenka is amort and Valenka is checked then Valenka is cautious. All javanese people are checked. If someone is cautious and not javanese then they are stygian. Big people are stygian. If someone is checked and not composed then they are stygian. All stygian people are cervical. Valenka is not composed.", "logic": "\nAmort(aguinaldo)\nComposed(aguinaldo)\nCervical(aguinaldo)\nJavanese(aguinaldo)\nStygian(aguinaldo)\nChecked(aguinaldo)\nAmort(lucien)\nAmort(valenka)\nJavanese(valenka)\nStygian(valenka)\nforall x (Amort(x) and not Javanese(x) -> Composed(x))\nforall x (Cautious(x) and Checked(x) -> Composed(x))\nAmort(valenka) and Checked(valenka) -> Cautious(valenka)\nforall x (Javanese(x) -> Checked(x))\nforall x (Cautious(x) and not Javanese(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Amort(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Checked(x) and not Composed(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Stygian(x) -> Cervical(x))\n\nnot Composed(valenka)\n\nJavanese(valenka) and forall x (Javanese(x) -> Checked(x)) -> therefore Checked(valenka) Amort(valenka) and Checked(valenka) and Amort(valenka) and Checked(valenka) -> Cautious(valenka) -> therefore Cautious(valenka) Javanese(valenka) and forall x (Javanese(x) -> Checked(x)) -> therefore Checked(valenka) Cautious(valenka) and Checked(valenka) and forall x (Cautious(x) and Checked(x) -> Composed(x)) -> therefore Composed(valenka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Tuesday is flecked. Tuesday is gristly. Tuesday is drugless. Tuesday is disjoined. Tuesday is vaporish. Tuesday is refreshful. Brock is flecked. Tibold is flecked. Tibold is disjoined. Tibold is vaporish. If someone is flecked and not disjoined then they are gristly. Green, refreshful people are gristly. If Tibold is flecked and Tibold is refreshful then Tibold is mazed. All disjoined people are refreshful. If someone is mazed and not disjoined then they are vaporish. Big people are vaporish. If someone is refreshful and not gristly then they are vaporish. All vaporish people are drugless. Brock is not refreshful.", "logic": "\nFlecked(tuesday)\nGristly(tuesday)\nDrugless(tuesday)\nDisjoined(tuesday)\nVaporish(tuesday)\nRefreshful(tuesday)\nFlecked(brock)\nFlecked(tibold)\nDisjoined(tibold)\nVaporish(tibold)\nforall x (Flecked(x) and not Disjoined(x) -> Gristly(x))\nforall x (Mazed(x) and Refreshful(x) -> Gristly(x))\nFlecked(tibold) and Refreshful(tibold) -> Mazed(tibold)\nforall x (Disjoined(x) -> Refreshful(x))\nforall x (Mazed(x) and not Disjoined(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Flecked(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Refreshful(x) and not Gristly(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Drugless(x))\n\nnot Refreshful(brock)\n\nforall x (Disjoined(x) -> Refreshful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Allin is tending. Allin is tired. Allin is petrifying. Allin is biform. Allin is neoliberal. Allin is spiteful. Mareah is tending. Partha is tending. Partha is biform. Partha is neoliberal. If someone is tending and not biform then they are tired. Green, spiteful people are tired. If Partha is tending and Partha is spiteful then Partha is phony. All biform people are spiteful. If someone is phony and not biform then they are neoliberal. Big people are neoliberal. If someone is spiteful and not tired then they are neoliberal. All neoliberal people are petrifying. Mareah is tired.", "logic": "\nTending(allin)\nTired(allin)\nPetrifying(allin)\nBiform(allin)\nNeoliberal(allin)\nSpiteful(allin)\nTending(mareah)\nTending(partha)\nBiform(partha)\nNeoliberal(partha)\nforall x (Tending(x) and not Biform(x) -> Tired(x))\nforall x (Phony(x) and Spiteful(x) -> Tired(x))\nTending(partha) and Spiteful(partha) -> Phony(partha)\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Spiteful(x))\nforall x (Phony(x) and not Biform(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (Tending(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) and not Tired(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Petrifying(x))\n\nTired(mareah)\n\nforall x (Tending(x) and not Biform(x) -> Tired(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Goldie is hindi. Goldie is asterismal. Goldie is manlike. Goldie is unbeknown. Goldie is epideictic. Goldie is refined. Rodina is hindi. Joane is hindi. Joane is unbeknown. Joane is epideictic. If someone is hindi and not unbeknown then they are asterismal. Green, refined people are asterismal. If Joane is hindi and Joane is refined then Joane is angular. All unbeknown people are refined. If someone is angular and not unbeknown then they are epideictic. Big people are epideictic. If someone is refined and not asterismal then they are epideictic. All epideictic people are manlike. Goldie is not angular.", "logic": "\nHindi(goldie)\nAsterismal(goldie)\nManlike(goldie)\nUnbeknown(goldie)\nEpideictic(goldie)\nRefined(goldie)\nHindi(rodina)\nHindi(joane)\nUnbeknown(joane)\nEpideictic(joane)\nforall x (Hindi(x) and not Unbeknown(x) -> Asterismal(x))\nforall x (Angular(x) and Refined(x) -> Asterismal(x))\nHindi(joane) and Refined(joane) -> Angular(joane)\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Angular(x) and not Unbeknown(x) -> Epideictic(x))\nforall x (Hindi(x) -> Epideictic(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) and not Asterismal(x) -> Epideictic(x))\nforall x (Epideictic(x) -> Manlike(x))\n\nnot Angular(goldie)\n\nnot Angular(goldie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Cissie is unlit. Cissie is pliant. Cissie is befogged. Cissie is tobagonian. Cissie is southern. Cissie is fatherless. Ethelred is unlit. Natala is unlit. Natala is tobagonian. Natala is southern. If someone is unlit and not tobagonian then they are pliant. Green, fatherless people are pliant. If Natala is unlit and Natala is fatherless then Natala is spherical. All tobagonian people are fatherless. If someone is spherical and not tobagonian then they are southern. Big people are southern. If someone is fatherless and not pliant then they are southern. All southern people are befogged. Ethelred is tobagonian.", "logic": "\nUnlit(cissie)\nPliant(cissie)\nBefogged(cissie)\nTobagonian(cissie)\nSouthern(cissie)\nFatherless(cissie)\nUnlit(ethelred)\nUnlit(natala)\nTobagonian(natala)\nSouthern(natala)\nforall x (Unlit(x) and not Tobagonian(x) -> Pliant(x))\nforall x (Spherical(x) and Fatherless(x) -> Pliant(x))\nUnlit(natala) and Fatherless(natala) -> Spherical(natala)\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Fatherless(x))\nforall x (Spherical(x) and not Tobagonian(x) -> Southern(x))\nforall x (Unlit(x) -> Southern(x))\nforall x (Fatherless(x) and not Pliant(x) -> Southern(x))\nforall x (Southern(x) -> Befogged(x))\n\nTobagonian(ethelred)\n\nTobagonian(ethelred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Hetty is hygienic. Cassandry is not downfield. If something is edentulate and not downfield then it is not hygienic. All fagged, debasing things are hygienic. If Hetty is epicene then Hetty is not brownish. Smart, debasing things are fagged. Smart things are edentulate. All edentulate things are debasing. Cassandry is not downfield.", "logic": "\nHygienic(hetty)\nnot Downfield(cassandry)\nforall x (Edentulate(x) and not Downfield(x) -> not Hygienic(x))\nforall x (Fagged(x) and Debasing(x) -> Hygienic(x))\nEpicene(hetty) -> not Brownish(hetty)\nforall x (Hygienic(x) and Debasing(x) -> Fagged(x))\nforall x (Hygienic(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nforall x (Edentulate(x) -> Debasing(x))\n\nnot Downfield(cassandry)\n\ntherefore not Downfield(cassandry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Dolley is bumbling. Erik is not prodromic. If something is unseamed and not prodromic then it is not bumbling. All graphic, saponified things are bumbling. If Dolley is manchurian then Dolley is not basophilic. Smart, saponified things are graphic. Smart things are unseamed. All unseamed things are saponified. Dolley is not bumbling.", "logic": "\nBumbling(dolley)\nnot Prodromic(erik)\nforall x (Unseamed(x) and not Prodromic(x) -> not Bumbling(x))\nforall x (Graphic(x) and Saponified(x) -> Bumbling(x))\nManchurian(dolley) -> not Basophilic(dolley)\nforall x (Bumbling(x) and Saponified(x) -> Graphic(x))\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Unseamed(x) -> Saponified(x))\n\nnot Bumbling(dolley)\n\ntherefore Bumbling(dolley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Star is manichean. Dieter is not angulate. If something is reliant and not angulate then it is not manichean. All overmodest, aflutter things are manichean. If Star is mitral then Star is not ciliary. Smart, aflutter things are overmodest. Smart things are reliant. All reliant things are aflutter. Star is reliant.", "logic": "\nManichean(star)\nnot Angulate(dieter)\nforall x (Reliant(x) and not Angulate(x) -> not Manichean(x))\nforall x (Overmodest(x) and Aflutter(x) -> Manichean(x))\nMitral(star) -> not Ciliary(star)\nforall x (Manichean(x) and Aflutter(x) -> Overmodest(x))\nforall x (Manichean(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Reliant(x) -> Aflutter(x))\n\nReliant(star)\n\nManichean(star) and forall x (Manichean(x) -> Reliant(x)) -> therefore Reliant(star)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Melisent is hieratical. Vivianna is not isotonic. If something is roadless and not isotonic then it is not hieratical. All sabahan, staunch things are hieratical. If Melisent is fidgety then Melisent is not dantean. Smart, staunch things are sabahan. Smart things are roadless. All roadless things are staunch. Melisent is not roadless.", "logic": "\nHieratical(melisent)\nnot Isotonic(vivianna)\nforall x (Roadless(x) and not Isotonic(x) -> not Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) and Staunch(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nFidgety(melisent) -> not Dantean(melisent)\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Staunch(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Hieratical(x) -> Roadless(x))\nforall x (Roadless(x) -> Staunch(x))\n\nnot Roadless(melisent)\n\nHieratical(melisent) and forall x (Hieratical(x) -> Roadless(x)) -> therefore Roadless(melisent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Paten is toothsome. Madelin is not thorough. If something is tardive and not thorough then it is not toothsome. All comforting, unsheathed things are toothsome. If Paten is seaworthy then Paten is not upset. Smart, unsheathed things are comforting. Smart things are tardive. All tardive things are unsheathed. Paten is unsheathed.", "logic": "\nToothsome(paten)\nnot Thorough(madelin)\nforall x (Tardive(x) and not Thorough(x) -> not Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Comforting(x) and Unsheathed(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nSeaworthy(paten) -> not Upset(paten)\nforall x (Toothsome(x) and Unsheathed(x) -> Comforting(x))\nforall x (Toothsome(x) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Tardive(x) -> Unsheathed(x))\n\nUnsheathed(paten)\n\nToothsome(paten) and forall x (Toothsome(x) -> Tardive(x)) -> therefore Tardive(paten) Tardive(paten) and forall x (Tardive(x) -> Unsheathed(x)) -> therefore Unsheathed(paten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Ardith is pantropic. Stephan is not slipping. If something is above and not slipping then it is not pantropic. All blanched, riant things are pantropic. If Ardith is gingery then Ardith is not concordant. Smart, riant things are blanched. Smart things are above. All above things are riant. Ardith is not riant.", "logic": "\nPantropic(ardith)\nnot Slipping(stephan)\nforall x (Above(x) and not Slipping(x) -> not Pantropic(x))\nforall x (Blanched(x) and Riant(x) -> Pantropic(x))\nGingery(ardith) -> not Concordant(ardith)\nforall x (Pantropic(x) and Riant(x) -> Blanched(x))\nforall x (Pantropic(x) -> Above(x))\nforall x (Above(x) -> Riant(x))\n\nnot Riant(ardith)\n\nPantropic(ardith) and forall x (Pantropic(x) -> Above(x)) -> therefore Above(ardith) Above(ardith) and forall x (Above(x) -> Riant(x)) -> therefore Riant(ardith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Ellissa is profuse. Eliza is not pleonastic. If something is hymenal and not pleonastic then it is not profuse. All boned, iffy things are profuse. If Ellissa is fistulous then Ellissa is not stative. Smart, iffy things are boned. Smart things are hymenal. All hymenal things are iffy. Ellissa is boned.", "logic": "\nProfuse(ellissa)\nnot Pleonastic(eliza)\nforall x (Hymenal(x) and not Pleonastic(x) -> not Profuse(x))\nforall x (Boned(x) and Iffy(x) -> Profuse(x))\nFistulous(ellissa) -> not Stative(ellissa)\nforall x (Profuse(x) and Iffy(x) -> Boned(x))\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Hymenal(x))\nforall x (Hymenal(x) -> Iffy(x))\n\nBoned(ellissa)\n\nProfuse(ellissa) and forall x (Profuse(x) -> Hymenal(x)) -> therefore Hymenal(ellissa) Hymenal(ellissa) and forall x (Hymenal(x) -> Iffy(x)) -> therefore Iffy(ellissa) Profuse(ellissa) and Iffy(ellissa) and forall x (Profuse(x) and Iffy(x) -> Boned(x)) -> therefore Boned(ellissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Mayor is vestigial. Talbot is not invariant. If something is ataraxic and not invariant then it is not vestigial. All genotypic, beggarly things are vestigial. If Mayor is errhine then Mayor is not barebacked. Smart, beggarly things are genotypic. Smart things are ataraxic. All ataraxic things are beggarly. Mayor is not genotypic.", "logic": "\nVestigial(mayor)\nnot Invariant(talbot)\nforall x (Ataraxic(x) and not Invariant(x) -> not Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Genotypic(x) and Beggarly(x) -> Vestigial(x))\nErrhine(mayor) -> not Barebacked(mayor)\nforall x (Vestigial(x) and Beggarly(x) -> Genotypic(x))\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> Ataraxic(x))\nforall x (Ataraxic(x) -> Beggarly(x))\n\nnot Genotypic(mayor)\n\nVestigial(mayor) and forall x (Vestigial(x) -> Ataraxic(x)) -> therefore Ataraxic(mayor) Ataraxic(mayor) and forall x (Ataraxic(x) -> Beggarly(x)) -> therefore Beggarly(mayor) Vestigial(mayor) and Beggarly(mayor) and forall x (Vestigial(x) and Beggarly(x) -> Genotypic(x)) -> therefore Genotypic(mayor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Sherill is correct. Goldie is not peripteral. If something is biographic and not peripteral then it is not correct. All localised, infrasonic things are correct. If Sherill is unlobed then Sherill is not deformed. Smart, infrasonic things are localised. Smart things are biographic. All biographic things are infrasonic. Goldie is not infrasonic.", "logic": "\nCorrect(sherill)\nnot Peripteral(goldie)\nforall x (Biographic(x) and not Peripteral(x) -> not Correct(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) and Infrasonic(x) -> Correct(x))\nUnlobed(sherill) -> not Deformed(sherill)\nforall x (Correct(x) and Infrasonic(x) -> Localised(x))\nforall x (Correct(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\n\nnot Infrasonic(goldie)\n\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Infrasonic(x)) <- forall x (Correct(x) -> Biographic(x)) <- forall x (Localised(x) and Infrasonic(x) -> Correct(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Flossi is elective. Samaria is not agnostical. If something is regent and not agnostical then it is not elective. All opalescent, enviable things are elective. If Flossi is anosmic then Flossi is not momentary. Smart, enviable things are opalescent. Smart things are regent. All regent things are enviable. Samaria is elective.", "logic": "\nElective(flossi)\nnot Agnostical(samaria)\nforall x (Regent(x) and not Agnostical(x) -> not Elective(x))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) and Enviable(x) -> Elective(x))\nAnosmic(flossi) -> not Momentary(flossi)\nforall x (Elective(x) and Enviable(x) -> Opalescent(x))\nforall x (Elective(x) -> Regent(x))\nforall x (Regent(x) -> Enviable(x))\n\nElective(samaria)\n\nforall x (Opalescent(x) and Enviable(x) -> Elective(x)) <- forall x (Elective(x) and Enviable(x) -> Opalescent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Ursola is buckshee. Boris is not revocable. If something is alternate and not revocable then it is not buckshee. All ahorseback, xlvi things are buckshee. If Ursola is isolable then Ursola is not juicy. Smart, xlvi things are ahorseback. Smart things are alternate. All alternate things are xlvi. Boris is not ahorseback.", "logic": "\nBuckshee(ursola)\nnot Revocable(boris)\nforall x (Alternate(x) and not Revocable(x) -> not Buckshee(x))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nIsolable(ursola) -> not Juicy(ursola)\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> Alternate(x))\nforall x (Alternate(x) -> Xlvi(x))\n\nnot Ahorseback(boris)\n\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Ahorseback(x)) <- forall x (Ahorseback(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Buckshee(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Jenifer is edentate. Pincas is not square. If something is fecund and not square then it is not edentate. All styptic, virgin things are edentate. If Jenifer is stray then Jenifer is not carinal. Smart, virgin things are styptic. Smart things are fecund. All fecund things are virgin. Pincas is fecund.", "logic": "\nEdentate(jenifer)\nnot Square(pincas)\nforall x (Fecund(x) and not Square(x) -> not Edentate(x))\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Virgin(x) -> Edentate(x))\nStray(jenifer) -> not Carinal(jenifer)\nforall x (Edentate(x) and Virgin(x) -> Styptic(x))\nforall x (Edentate(x) -> Fecund(x))\nforall x (Fecund(x) -> Virgin(x))\n\nFecund(pincas)\n\nforall x (Edentate(x) -> Fecund(x)) <- forall x (Styptic(x) and Virgin(x) -> Edentate(x)) <- forall x (Edentate(x) and Virgin(x) -> Styptic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Shem is operant. Riane is not runcinate. If something is onetime and not runcinate then it is not operant. All truthful, wretched things are operant. If Shem is ectopic then Shem is not hematal. Smart, wretched things are truthful. Smart things are onetime. All onetime things are wretched. Riane is not hematal.", "logic": "\nOperant(shem)\nnot Runcinate(riane)\nforall x (Onetime(x) and not Runcinate(x) -> not Operant(x))\nforall x (Truthful(x) and Wretched(x) -> Operant(x))\nEctopic(shem) -> not Hematal(shem)\nforall x (Operant(x) and Wretched(x) -> Truthful(x))\nforall x (Operant(x) -> Onetime(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Wretched(x))\n\nnot Hematal(riane)\n\nnot Hematal(riane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Rosemary is unnameable. Gilbert is not nonplussed. If something is brushy and not nonplussed then it is not unnameable. All weather, fetid things are unnameable. If Rosemary is malapropos then Rosemary is not fitting. Smart, fetid things are weather. Smart things are brushy. All brushy things are fetid. Rosemary is nonplussed.", "logic": "\nUnnameable(rosemary)\nnot Nonplussed(gilbert)\nforall x (Brushy(x) and not Nonplussed(x) -> not Unnameable(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) and Fetid(x) -> Unnameable(x))\nMalapropos(rosemary) -> not Fitting(rosemary)\nforall x (Unnameable(x) and Fetid(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Unnameable(x) -> Brushy(x))\nforall x (Brushy(x) -> Fetid(x))\n\nNonplussed(rosemary)\n\nNonplussed(rosemary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Jessey is oleaceous. Bevvy is not motiveless. If something is podlike and not motiveless then it is not oleaceous. All valiant, accessible things are oleaceous. If Jessey is portable then Jessey is not outcaste. Smart, accessible things are valiant. Smart things are podlike. All podlike things are accessible. Jessey is not portable.", "logic": "\nOleaceous(jessey)\nnot Motiveless(bevvy)\nforall x (Podlike(x) and not Motiveless(x) -> not Oleaceous(x))\nforall x (Valiant(x) and Accessible(x) -> Oleaceous(x))\nPortable(jessey) -> not Outcaste(jessey)\nforall x (Oleaceous(x) and Accessible(x) -> Valiant(x))\nforall x (Oleaceous(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Podlike(x) -> Accessible(x))\n\nnot Portable(jessey)\n\nnot Portable(jessey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Mae is italic. Mallissa is not perturbing. If something is inverse and not perturbing then it is not italic. All netted, instinct things are italic. If Mae is icebound then Mae is not theatrical. Smart, instinct things are netted. Smart things are inverse. All inverse things are instinct. Mallissa is icebound.", "logic": "\nItalic(mae)\nnot Perturbing(mallissa)\nforall x (Inverse(x) and not Perturbing(x) -> not Italic(x))\nforall x (Netted(x) and Instinct(x) -> Italic(x))\nIcebound(mae) -> not Theatrical(mae)\nforall x (Italic(x) and Instinct(x) -> Netted(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Inverse(x))\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Instinct(x))\n\nIcebound(mallissa)\n\nIcebound(mallissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "The ravil is amazing. The ravil consent the alissa. The ravil humidify the enrica. The alissa consent the ravil. The alissa consent the enrica. The enrica is diamantine. The enrica is calvinist. If something is calvinist then it humidify the alissa. If the alissa is capsulated then the alissa salinate the enrica. If something is calvinist then it is amazing. If something consent the enrica then it consent the ravil. If something consent the enrica then it is amazing. If the alissa is amazing then the alissa is capsulated. The alissa consent the enrica.", "logic": "\nAmazing(ravil)\nConsent(ravil, alissa)\nHumidify(ravil, enrica)\nConsent(alissa, ravil)\nConsent(alissa, enrica)\nDiamantine(enrica)\nCalvinist(enrica)\nforall x (Calvinist(x) -> Humidify(x, alissa))\nCapsulated(alissa) -> Salinate(alissa, enrica)\nforall x (Calvinist(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Consent(x, enrica) -> Consent(x, ravil))\nforall x (Consent(x, enrica) -> Amazing(x))\nAmazing(alissa) -> Capsulated(alissa)\n\nConsent(alissa, enrica)\n\ntherefore Consent(alissa, enrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The anallese is drudging. The anallese toss the neel. The anallese decoct the pearline. The neel toss the anallese. The neel toss the pearline. The pearline is buckshee. The pearline is sabine. If something is sabine then it decoct the neel. If the neel is composed then the neel birr the pearline. If something is sabine then it is drudging. If something toss the pearline then it toss the anallese. If something toss the pearline then it is drudging. If the neel is drudging then the neel is composed. The anallese does not visit the pearline.", "logic": "\nDrudging(anallese)\nToss(anallese, neel)\nDecoct(anallese, pearline)\nToss(neel, anallese)\nToss(neel, pearline)\nBuckshee(pearline)\nSabine(pearline)\nforall x (Sabine(x) -> Decoct(x, neel))\nComposed(neel) -> Birr(neel, pearline)\nforall x (Sabine(x) -> Drudging(x))\nforall x (Toss(x, pearline) -> Toss(x, anallese))\nforall x (Toss(x, pearline) -> Drudging(x))\nDrudging(neel) -> Composed(neel)\n\nnot Decoct(anallese, pearline)\n\ntherefore Decoct(anallese, pearline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The roy is thousand. The roy forego the reba. The roy reword the orville. The reba forego the roy. The reba forego the orville. The orville is phonic. The orville is sheathed. If something is sheathed then it reword the reba. If the reba is glutted then the reba volley the orville. If something is sheathed then it is thousand. If something forego the orville then it forego the roy. If something forego the orville then it is thousand. If the reba is thousand then the reba is glutted. The orville is thousand.", "logic": "\nThousand(roy)\nForego(roy, reba)\nReword(roy, orville)\nForego(reba, roy)\nForego(reba, orville)\nPhonic(orville)\nSheathed(orville)\nforall x (Sheathed(x) -> Reword(x, reba))\nGlutted(reba) -> Volley(reba, orville)\nforall x (Sheathed(x) -> Thousand(x))\nforall x (Forego(x, orville) -> Forego(x, roy))\nforall x (Forego(x, orville) -> Thousand(x))\nThousand(reba) -> Glutted(reba)\n\nThousand(orville)\n\nSheathed(orville) and forall x (Sheathed(x) -> Thousand(x)) -> therefore Thousand(orville)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The leda is prodigious. The leda mongrelise the abner. The leda endeavour the izaak. The abner mongrelise the leda. The abner mongrelise the izaak. The izaak is nutritious. The izaak is plausible. If something is plausible then it endeavour the abner. If the abner is preceding then the abner whisper the izaak. If something is plausible then it is prodigious. If something mongrelise the izaak then it mongrelise the leda. If something mongrelise the izaak then it is prodigious. If the abner is prodigious then the abner is preceding. The izaak does not visit the abner.", "logic": "\nProdigious(leda)\nMongrelise(leda, abner)\nEndeavour(leda, izaak)\nMongrelise(abner, leda)\nMongrelise(abner, izaak)\nNutritious(izaak)\nPlausible(izaak)\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> Endeavour(x, abner))\nPreceding(abner) -> Whisper(abner, izaak)\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> Prodigious(x))\nforall x (Mongrelise(x, izaak) -> Mongrelise(x, leda))\nforall x (Mongrelise(x, izaak) -> Prodigious(x))\nProdigious(abner) -> Preceding(abner)\n\nnot Endeavour(izaak, abner)\n\nPlausible(izaak) and forall x (Plausible(x) -> Endeavour(x, abner)) -> therefore Endeavour(izaak, abner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The henka is malign. The henka bail the avril. The henka saddle the stavros. The avril bail the henka. The avril bail the stavros. The stavros is gumptious. The stavros is unadapted. If something is unadapted then it saddle the avril. If the avril is alight then the avril rename the stavros. If something is unadapted then it is malign. If something bail the stavros then it bail the henka. If something bail the stavros then it is malign. If the avril is malign then the avril is alight. The avril is alight.", "logic": "\nMalign(henka)\nBail(henka, avril)\nSaddle(henka, stavros)\nBail(avril, henka)\nBail(avril, stavros)\nGumptious(stavros)\nUnadapted(stavros)\nforall x (Unadapted(x) -> Saddle(x, avril))\nAlight(avril) -> Rename(avril, stavros)\nforall x (Unadapted(x) -> Malign(x))\nforall x (Bail(x, stavros) -> Bail(x, henka))\nforall x (Bail(x, stavros) -> Malign(x))\nMalign(avril) -> Alight(avril)\n\nAlight(avril)\n\nBail(avril, stavros) and forall x (Bail(x, stavros) -> Malign(x)) -> therefore Malign(avril) Malign(avril) and Malign(avril) -> Alight(avril) -> therefore Alight(avril)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The felicle is ergotic. The felicle disorient the rich. The felicle colonise the kelli. The rich disorient the felicle. The rich disorient the kelli. The kelli is withdrawn. The kelli is sonant. If something is sonant then it colonise the rich. If the rich is nodding then the rich rubify the kelli. If something is sonant then it is ergotic. If something disorient the kelli then it disorient the felicle. If something disorient the kelli then it is ergotic. If the rich is ergotic then the rich is nodding. The rich is not nodding.", "logic": "\nErgotic(felicle)\nDisorient(felicle, rich)\nColonise(felicle, kelli)\nDisorient(rich, felicle)\nDisorient(rich, kelli)\nWithdrawn(kelli)\nSonant(kelli)\nforall x (Sonant(x) -> Colonise(x, rich))\nNodding(rich) -> Rubify(rich, kelli)\nforall x (Sonant(x) -> Ergotic(x))\nforall x (Disorient(x, kelli) -> Disorient(x, felicle))\nforall x (Disorient(x, kelli) -> Ergotic(x))\nErgotic(rich) -> Nodding(rich)\n\nnot Nodding(rich)\n\nDisorient(rich, kelli) and forall x (Disorient(x, kelli) -> Ergotic(x)) -> therefore Ergotic(rich) Ergotic(rich) and Ergotic(rich) -> Nodding(rich) -> therefore Nodding(rich)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The floris is stern. The floris dinge the doria. The floris spar the jacinta. The doria dinge the floris. The doria dinge the jacinta. The jacinta is coenobitic. The jacinta is nasty. If something is nasty then it spar the doria. If the doria is frozen then the doria zigzag the jacinta. If something is nasty then it is stern. If something dinge the jacinta then it dinge the floris. If something dinge the jacinta then it is stern. If the doria is stern then the doria is frozen. The doria zigzag the jacinta.", "logic": "\nStern(floris)\nDinge(floris, doria)\nSpar(floris, jacinta)\nDinge(doria, floris)\nDinge(doria, jacinta)\nCoenobitic(jacinta)\nNasty(jacinta)\nforall x (Nasty(x) -> Spar(x, doria))\nFrozen(doria) -> Zigzag(doria, jacinta)\nforall x (Nasty(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Dinge(x, jacinta) -> Dinge(x, floris))\nforall x (Dinge(x, jacinta) -> Stern(x))\nStern(doria) -> Frozen(doria)\n\nZigzag(doria, jacinta)\n\nDinge(doria, jacinta) and forall x (Dinge(x, jacinta) -> Stern(x)) -> therefore Stern(doria) Stern(doria) and Stern(doria) -> Frozen(doria) -> therefore Frozen(doria) Frozen(doria) and Frozen(doria) -> Zigzag(doria, jacinta) -> therefore Zigzag(doria, jacinta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The warde is bulbaceous. The warde sober the nicholle. The warde obfuscate the johnna. The nicholle sober the warde. The nicholle sober the johnna. The johnna is unbiased. The johnna is mettlesome. If something is mettlesome then it obfuscate the nicholle. If the nicholle is unliveried then the nicholle protest the johnna. If something is mettlesome then it is bulbaceous. If something sober the johnna then it sober the warde. If something sober the johnna then it is bulbaceous. If the nicholle is bulbaceous then the nicholle is unliveried. The nicholle does not like the johnna.", "logic": "\nBulbaceous(warde)\nSober(warde, nicholle)\nObfuscate(warde, johnna)\nSober(nicholle, warde)\nSober(nicholle, johnna)\nUnbiased(johnna)\nMettlesome(johnna)\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) -> Obfuscate(x, nicholle))\nUnliveried(nicholle) -> Protest(nicholle, johnna)\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) -> Bulbaceous(x))\nforall x (Sober(x, johnna) -> Sober(x, warde))\nforall x (Sober(x, johnna) -> Bulbaceous(x))\nBulbaceous(nicholle) -> Unliveried(nicholle)\n\nnot Protest(nicholle, johnna)\n\nSober(nicholle, johnna) and forall x (Sober(x, johnna) -> Bulbaceous(x)) -> therefore Bulbaceous(nicholle) Bulbaceous(nicholle) and Bulbaceous(nicholle) -> Unliveried(nicholle) -> therefore Unliveried(nicholle) Unliveried(nicholle) and Unliveried(nicholle) -> Protest(nicholle, johnna) -> therefore Protest(nicholle, johnna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The kaleb is heard. The kaleb explode the rayna. The kaleb ejaculate the dale. The rayna explode the kaleb. The rayna explode the dale. The dale is ignitible. The dale is pyretic. If something is pyretic then it ejaculate the rayna. If the rayna is doltish then the rayna rejoice the dale. If something is pyretic then it is heard. If something explode the dale then it explode the kaleb. If something explode the dale then it is heard. If the rayna is heard then the rayna is doltish. The dale does not need the kaleb.", "logic": "\nHeard(kaleb)\nExplode(kaleb, rayna)\nEjaculate(kaleb, dale)\nExplode(rayna, kaleb)\nExplode(rayna, dale)\nIgnitible(dale)\nPyretic(dale)\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Ejaculate(x, rayna))\nDoltish(rayna) -> Rejoice(rayna, dale)\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Heard(x))\nforall x (Explode(x, dale) -> Explode(x, kaleb))\nforall x (Explode(x, dale) -> Heard(x))\nHeard(rayna) -> Doltish(rayna)\n\nnot Explode(dale, kaleb)\n\nforall x (Explode(x, dale) -> Explode(x, kaleb)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The violette is steaming. The violette dislocate the olivier. The violette piddle the vijay. The olivier dislocate the violette. The olivier dislocate the vijay. The vijay is following. The vijay is expectable. If something is expectable then it piddle the olivier. If the olivier is select then the olivier laicise the vijay. If something is expectable then it is steaming. If something dislocate the vijay then it dislocate the violette. If something dislocate the vijay then it is steaming. If the olivier is steaming then the olivier is select. The violette piddle the olivier.", "logic": "\nSteaming(violette)\nDislocate(violette, olivier)\nPiddle(violette, vijay)\nDislocate(olivier, violette)\nDislocate(olivier, vijay)\nFollowing(vijay)\nExpectable(vijay)\nforall x (Expectable(x) -> Piddle(x, olivier))\nSelect(olivier) -> Laicise(olivier, vijay)\nforall x (Expectable(x) -> Steaming(x))\nforall x (Dislocate(x, vijay) -> Dislocate(x, violette))\nforall x (Dislocate(x, vijay) -> Steaming(x))\nSteaming(olivier) -> Select(olivier)\n\nPiddle(violette, olivier)\n\nforall x (Expectable(x) -> Piddle(x, olivier)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The giancarlo is supernal. The giancarlo thunder the davide. The giancarlo modernise the johanna. The davide thunder the giancarlo. The davide thunder the johanna. The johanna is designing. The johanna is medicinal. If something is medicinal then it modernise the davide. If the davide is visceral then the davide establish the johanna. If something is medicinal then it is supernal. If something thunder the johanna then it thunder the giancarlo. If something thunder the johanna then it is supernal. If the davide is supernal then the davide is visceral. The davide does not visit the davide.", "logic": "\nSupernal(giancarlo)\nThunder(giancarlo, davide)\nModernise(giancarlo, johanna)\nThunder(davide, giancarlo)\nThunder(davide, johanna)\nDesigning(johanna)\nMedicinal(johanna)\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Modernise(x, davide))\nVisceral(davide) -> Establish(davide, johanna)\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Thunder(x, johanna) -> Thunder(x, giancarlo))\nforall x (Thunder(x, johanna) -> Supernal(x))\nSupernal(davide) -> Visceral(davide)\n\nnot Modernise(davide, davide)\n\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Modernise(x, davide)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The evie is aquaphobic. The evie tease the ignatius. The evie shepherd the hodge. The ignatius tease the evie. The ignatius tease the hodge. The hodge is authorized. The hodge is abstract. If something is abstract then it shepherd the ignatius. If the ignatius is vibrant then the ignatius pass the hodge. If something is abstract then it is aquaphobic. If something tease the hodge then it tease the evie. If something tease the hodge then it is aquaphobic. If the ignatius is aquaphobic then the ignatius is vibrant. The evie tease the evie.", "logic": "\nAquaphobic(evie)\nTease(evie, ignatius)\nShepherd(evie, hodge)\nTease(ignatius, evie)\nTease(ignatius, hodge)\nAuthorized(hodge)\nAbstract(hodge)\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Shepherd(x, ignatius))\nVibrant(ignatius) -> Pass(ignatius, hodge)\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Aquaphobic(x))\nforall x (Tease(x, hodge) -> Tease(x, evie))\nforall x (Tease(x, hodge) -> Aquaphobic(x))\nAquaphobic(ignatius) -> Vibrant(ignatius)\n\nTease(evie, evie)\n\nforall x (Tease(x, hodge) -> Tease(x, evie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The jamie is notched. The jamie hitch the janene. The jamie tangle the mercedes. The janene hitch the jamie. The janene hitch the mercedes. The mercedes is undismayed. The mercedes is overseas. If something is overseas then it tangle the janene. If the janene is saxatile then the janene rebut the mercedes. If something is overseas then it is notched. If something hitch the mercedes then it hitch the jamie. If something hitch the mercedes then it is notched. If the janene is notched then the janene is saxatile. The janene does not visit the mercedes.", "logic": "\nNotched(jamie)\nHitch(jamie, janene)\nTangle(jamie, mercedes)\nHitch(janene, jamie)\nHitch(janene, mercedes)\nUndismayed(mercedes)\nOverseas(mercedes)\nforall x (Overseas(x) -> Tangle(x, janene))\nSaxatile(janene) -> Rebut(janene, mercedes)\nforall x (Overseas(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Hitch(x, mercedes) -> Hitch(x, jamie))\nforall x (Hitch(x, mercedes) -> Notched(x))\nNotched(janene) -> Saxatile(janene)\n\nnot Tangle(janene, mercedes)\n\nnot Tangle(janene, mercedes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The ardyth is areal. The ardyth ruminate the sophey. The ardyth aphorise the tori. The sophey ruminate the ardyth. The sophey ruminate the tori. The tori is baleful. The tori is unranked. If something is unranked then it aphorise the sophey. If the sophey is saleable then the sophey oink the tori. If something is unranked then it is areal. If something ruminate the tori then it ruminate the ardyth. If something ruminate the tori then it is areal. If the sophey is areal then the sophey is saleable. The ardyth aphorise the ardyth.", "logic": "\nAreal(ardyth)\nRuminate(ardyth, sophey)\nAphorise(ardyth, tori)\nRuminate(sophey, ardyth)\nRuminate(sophey, tori)\nBaleful(tori)\nUnranked(tori)\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> Aphorise(x, sophey))\nSaleable(sophey) -> Oink(sophey, tori)\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> Areal(x))\nforall x (Ruminate(x, tori) -> Ruminate(x, ardyth))\nforall x (Ruminate(x, tori) -> Areal(x))\nAreal(sophey) -> Saleable(sophey)\n\nAphorise(ardyth, ardyth)\n\nAphorise(ardyth, ardyth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The giacinta is backless. The giacinta clomp the chevy. The giacinta compact the lilith. The chevy clomp the giacinta. The chevy clomp the lilith. The lilith is newfound. The lilith is putrescent. If something is putrescent then it compact the chevy. If the chevy is protecting then the chevy stopper the lilith. If something is putrescent then it is backless. If something clomp the lilith then it clomp the giacinta. If something clomp the lilith then it is backless. If the chevy is backless then the chevy is protecting. The giacinta is not big.", "logic": "\nBackless(giacinta)\nClomp(giacinta, chevy)\nCompact(giacinta, lilith)\nClomp(chevy, giacinta)\nClomp(chevy, lilith)\nNewfound(lilith)\nPutrescent(lilith)\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Compact(x, chevy))\nProtecting(chevy) -> Stopper(chevy, lilith)\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Backless(x))\nforall x (Clomp(x, lilith) -> Clomp(x, giacinta))\nforall x (Clomp(x, lilith) -> Backless(x))\nBackless(chevy) -> Protecting(chevy)\n\nnot Big(giacinta)\n\nnot Big(giacinta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The lewis is unneurotic. The lewis arborize the hill. The lewis starboard the cleopatra. The hill arborize the lewis. The hill arborize the cleopatra. The cleopatra is uniparous. The cleopatra is gratuitous. If something is gratuitous then it starboard the hill. If the hill is malay then the hill reshape the cleopatra. If something is gratuitous then it is unneurotic. If something arborize the cleopatra then it arborize the lewis. If something arborize the cleopatra then it is unneurotic. If the hill is unneurotic then the hill is malay. The cleopatra reshape the hill.", "logic": "\nUnneurotic(lewis)\nArborize(lewis, hill)\nStarboard(lewis, cleopatra)\nArborize(hill, lewis)\nArborize(hill, cleopatra)\nUniparous(cleopatra)\nGratuitous(cleopatra)\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) -> Starboard(x, hill))\nMalay(hill) -> Reshape(hill, cleopatra)\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Arborize(x, cleopatra) -> Arborize(x, lewis))\nforall x (Arborize(x, cleopatra) -> Unneurotic(x))\nUnneurotic(hill) -> Malay(hill)\n\nReshape(cleopatra, hill)\n\nReshape(cleopatra, hill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "Taite is thirtieth. Tammara is hydraulic. Florrie is hydraulic. Daffie is alimental. Young things are despairing. If something is thirtieth then it is fastidious. If something is fastidious then it is smelling. Tammara is hydraulic.", "logic": "\nThirtieth(taite)\nHydraulic(tammara)\nHydraulic(florrie)\nAlimental(daffie)\nforall x (Smelling(x) -> Despairing(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Fastidious(x))\nforall x (Fastidious(x) -> Smelling(x))\n\nHydraulic(tammara)\n\ntherefore Hydraulic(tammara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Emilee is tattling. Jesselyn is spherical. Elfreda is spherical. Rachael is glistering. Young things are romansh. If something is tattling then it is routine. If something is routine then it is invalid. Rachael is not glistering.", "logic": "\nTattling(emilee)\nSpherical(jesselyn)\nSpherical(elfreda)\nGlistering(rachael)\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Tattling(x) -> Routine(x))\nforall x (Routine(x) -> Invalid(x))\n\nnot Glistering(rachael)\n\ntherefore Glistering(rachael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Kiersten is assignable. Wolfy is banal. Birgitta is banal. Jervis is moral. Young things are polite. If something is assignable then it is baltic. If something is baltic then it is pedigree. Kiersten is baltic.", "logic": "\nAssignable(kiersten)\nBanal(wolfy)\nBanal(birgitta)\nMoral(jervis)\nforall x (Pedigree(x) -> Polite(x))\nforall x (Assignable(x) -> Baltic(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) -> Pedigree(x))\n\nBaltic(kiersten)\n\nAssignable(kiersten) and forall x (Assignable(x) -> Baltic(x)) -> therefore Baltic(kiersten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Augustin is spidery. Raven is lamented. Avery is lamented. Martyn is saving. Young things are fake. If something is spidery then it is naming. If something is naming then it is prakritic. Augustin is not naming.", "logic": "\nSpidery(augustin)\nLamented(raven)\nLamented(avery)\nSaving(martyn)\nforall x (Prakritic(x) -> Fake(x))\nforall x (Spidery(x) -> Naming(x))\nforall x (Naming(x) -> Prakritic(x))\n\nnot Naming(augustin)\n\nSpidery(augustin) and forall x (Spidery(x) -> Naming(x)) -> therefore Naming(augustin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Marten is offbeat. Adlai is unsighted. Davie is unsighted. Laural is peeved. Young things are crusty. If something is offbeat then it is cesarean. If something is cesarean then it is plumelike. Marten is plumelike.", "logic": "\nOffbeat(marten)\nUnsighted(adlai)\nUnsighted(davie)\nPeeved(laural)\nforall x (Plumelike(x) -> Crusty(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) -> Cesarean(x))\nforall x (Cesarean(x) -> Plumelike(x))\n\nPlumelike(marten)\n\nOffbeat(marten) and forall x (Offbeat(x) -> Cesarean(x)) -> therefore Cesarean(marten) Cesarean(marten) and forall x (Cesarean(x) -> Plumelike(x)) -> therefore Plumelike(marten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Ashton is balmy. Northrup is plutonian. Nelli is plutonian. Anetta is unrevised. Young things are unbeatable. If something is balmy then it is utilizable. If something is utilizable then it is novel. Ashton is not novel.", "logic": "\nBalmy(ashton)\nPlutonian(northrup)\nPlutonian(nelli)\nUnrevised(anetta)\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Unbeatable(x))\nforall x (Balmy(x) -> Utilizable(x))\nforall x (Utilizable(x) -> Novel(x))\n\nnot Novel(ashton)\n\nBalmy(ashton) and forall x (Balmy(x) -> Utilizable(x)) -> therefore Utilizable(ashton) Utilizable(ashton) and forall x (Utilizable(x) -> Novel(x)) -> therefore Novel(ashton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Ellwood is blockaded. Roda is massive. Herbert is massive. Levi is carnation. Young things are reborn. If something is blockaded then it is phoenician. If something is phoenician then it is abstemious. Ellwood is reborn.", "logic": "\nBlockaded(ellwood)\nMassive(roda)\nMassive(herbert)\nCarnation(levi)\nforall x (Abstemious(x) -> Reborn(x))\nforall x (Blockaded(x) -> Phoenician(x))\nforall x (Phoenician(x) -> Abstemious(x))\n\nReborn(ellwood)\n\nBlockaded(ellwood) and forall x (Blockaded(x) -> Phoenician(x)) -> therefore Phoenician(ellwood) Phoenician(ellwood) and forall x (Phoenician(x) -> Abstemious(x)) -> therefore Abstemious(ellwood) Abstemious(ellwood) and forall x (Abstemious(x) -> Reborn(x)) -> therefore Reborn(ellwood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Diahann is criminal. Gustavus is hispanic. Emmalyn is hispanic. Cynthea is aerolitic. Young things are romanian. If something is criminal then it is dual. If something is dual then it is crack. Diahann is not romanian.", "logic": "\nCriminal(diahann)\nHispanic(gustavus)\nHispanic(emmalyn)\nAerolitic(cynthea)\nforall x (Crack(x) -> Romanian(x))\nforall x (Criminal(x) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Crack(x))\n\nnot Romanian(diahann)\n\nCriminal(diahann) and forall x (Criminal(x) -> Dual(x)) -> therefore Dual(diahann) Dual(diahann) and forall x (Dual(x) -> Crack(x)) -> therefore Crack(diahann) Crack(diahann) and forall x (Crack(x) -> Romanian(x)) -> therefore Romanian(diahann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Rubetta is viable. Goldia is missed. Dayna is missed. Helga is ridged. Young things are aflame. If something is viable then it is yucky. If something is yucky then it is ischemic. Helga is not aflame.", "logic": "\nViable(rubetta)\nMissed(goldia)\nMissed(dayna)\nRidged(helga)\nforall x (Ischemic(x) -> Aflame(x))\nforall x (Viable(x) -> Yucky(x))\nforall x (Yucky(x) -> Ischemic(x))\n\nnot Aflame(helga)\n\nforall x (Ischemic(x) -> Aflame(x)) <- forall x (Yucky(x) -> Ischemic(x)) <- forall x (Viable(x) -> Yucky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Tuckie is dangerous. Beitris is rumansh. Anatola is rumansh. Apollo is imbricated. Young things are ionian. If something is dangerous then it is unenclosed. If something is unenclosed then it is unforested. Beitris is unenclosed.", "logic": "\nDangerous(tuckie)\nRumansh(beitris)\nRumansh(anatola)\nImbricated(apollo)\nforall x (Unforested(x) -> Ionian(x))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) -> Unenclosed(x))\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) -> Unforested(x))\n\nUnenclosed(beitris)\n\nforall x (Dangerous(x) -> Unenclosed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Goldy is unmanlike. Abagail is acting. Aram is acting. Sarine is eastbound. Young things are refreshed. If something is unmanlike then it is brute. If something is brute then it is blastular. Aram is not refreshed.", "logic": "\nUnmanlike(goldy)\nActing(abagail)\nActing(aram)\nEastbound(sarine)\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Refreshed(x))\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) -> Brute(x))\nforall x (Brute(x) -> Blastular(x))\n\nnot Refreshed(aram)\n\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Refreshed(x)) <- forall x (Brute(x) -> Blastular(x)) <- forall x (Unmanlike(x) -> Brute(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Tim is literate. Devon is subalpine. Tish is subalpine. Karleen is pagan. Young things are unshorn. If something is literate then it is cardiac. If something is cardiac then it is pandurate. Devon is pandurate.", "logic": "\nLiterate(tim)\nSubalpine(devon)\nSubalpine(tish)\nPagan(karleen)\nforall x (Pandurate(x) -> Unshorn(x))\nforall x (Literate(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Pandurate(x))\n\nPandurate(devon)\n\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Pandurate(x)) <- forall x (Literate(x) -> Cardiac(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Sheelah is anesthetic. Matteo is orthoptic. Nissy is orthoptic. Carolin is pantheist. Young things are plutonian. If something is anesthetic then it is received. If something is received then it is aortic. Nissy is not anesthetic.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(sheelah)\nOrthoptic(matteo)\nOrthoptic(nissy)\nPantheist(carolin)\nforall x (Aortic(x) -> Plutonian(x))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Received(x))\nforall x (Received(x) -> Aortic(x))\n\nnot Anesthetic(nissy)\n\nnot Anesthetic(nissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Dickie is piratical. Jaclyn is uncolored. Heide is uncolored. Robin is syntactic. Young things are peppy. If something is piratical then it is lovable. If something is lovable then it is inpouring. Robin is uncolored.", "logic": "\nPiratical(dickie)\nUncolored(jaclyn)\nUncolored(heide)\nSyntactic(robin)\nforall x (Inpouring(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Piratical(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Lovable(x) -> Inpouring(x))\n\nUncolored(robin)\n\nUncolored(robin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Nerita is valuable. Daisi is reddened. Gigi is reddened. Daisy is advective. Young things are antitumour. If something is valuable then it is tactical. If something is tactical then it is corrective. Daisy is not quiet.", "logic": "\nValuable(nerita)\nReddened(daisi)\nReddened(gigi)\nAdvective(daisy)\nforall x (Corrective(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Valuable(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Corrective(x))\n\nnot Quiet(daisy)\n\nnot Quiet(daisy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Mallissa is postictal. Cresa is nosocomial. Waring is nosocomial. Virge is clxx. Young things are sheeplike. If something is postictal then it is cordless. If something is cordless then it is eerie. Cresa is quiet.", "logic": "\nPostictal(mallissa)\nNosocomial(cresa)\nNosocomial(waring)\nClxx(virge)\nforall x (Eerie(x) -> Sheeplike(x))\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Cordless(x))\nforall x (Cordless(x) -> Eerie(x))\n\nQuiet(cresa)\n\nQuiet(cresa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Wilfred is dualistic. Wilfred is empyreal. Wilfred is enceinte. Adrianna is haemal. Adrianna is adult. Adrianna is empyreal. Adrianna is enceinte. Vaughan is dualistic. Vaughan is lactogenic. Vaughan is not haemal. Vaughan is empyreal. Jonis is writhing. Jonis is lactogenic. Jonis is not haemal. Jonis is adult. Jonis is empyreal. If someone is writhing and enceinte then they are lactogenic. If Vaughan is enceinte and Vaughan is not haemal then Vaughan is empyreal. If someone is haemal then they are dualistic. All empyreal people are dualistic. If someone is dualistic and lactogenic then they are adult. White, empyreal people are writhing. Adrianna is haemal.", "logic": "\nDualistic(wilfred)\nEmpyreal(wilfred)\nEnceinte(wilfred)\nHaemal(adrianna)\nAdult(adrianna)\nEmpyreal(adrianna)\nEnceinte(adrianna)\nDualistic(vaughan)\nLactogenic(vaughan)\nnot Haemal(vaughan)\nEmpyreal(vaughan)\nWrithing(jonis)\nLactogenic(jonis)\nnot Haemal(jonis)\nAdult(jonis)\nEmpyreal(jonis)\nforall x (Writhing(x) and Enceinte(x) -> Lactogenic(x))\nEnceinte(vaughan) and not Haemal(vaughan) -> Empyreal(vaughan)\nforall x (Haemal(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Empyreal(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Adult(x))\nforall x (Enceinte(x) and Empyreal(x) -> Writhing(x))\n\nHaemal(adrianna)\n\ntherefore Haemal(adrianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Nils is satellite. Nils is homophonic. Nils is blanched. Tobye is laurelled. Tobye is crustacean. Tobye is homophonic. Tobye is blanched. Aguinaldo is satellite. Aguinaldo is pedantic. Aguinaldo is not laurelled. Aguinaldo is homophonic. Hashim is spavined. Hashim is pedantic. Hashim is not laurelled. Hashim is crustacean. Hashim is homophonic. If someone is spavined and blanched then they are pedantic. If Aguinaldo is blanched and Aguinaldo is not laurelled then Aguinaldo is homophonic. If someone is laurelled then they are satellite. All homophonic people are satellite. If someone is satellite and pedantic then they are crustacean. White, homophonic people are spavined. Hashim is laurelled.", "logic": "\nSatellite(nils)\nHomophonic(nils)\nBlanched(nils)\nLaurelled(tobye)\nCrustacean(tobye)\nHomophonic(tobye)\nBlanched(tobye)\nSatellite(aguinaldo)\nPedantic(aguinaldo)\nnot Laurelled(aguinaldo)\nHomophonic(aguinaldo)\nSpavined(hashim)\nPedantic(hashim)\nnot Laurelled(hashim)\nCrustacean(hashim)\nHomophonic(hashim)\nforall x (Spavined(x) and Blanched(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nBlanched(aguinaldo) and not Laurelled(aguinaldo) -> Homophonic(aguinaldo)\nforall x (Laurelled(x) -> Satellite(x))\nforall x (Homophonic(x) -> Satellite(x))\nforall x (Satellite(x) and Pedantic(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Blanched(x) and Homophonic(x) -> Spavined(x))\n\nLaurelled(hashim)\n\ntherefore not Laurelled(hashim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Christean is localized. Christean is meddlesome. Christean is beaming. Nessi is unjust. Nessi is surging. Nessi is meddlesome. Nessi is beaming. Trixi is localized. Trixi is passee. Trixi is not unjust. Trixi is meddlesome. Durward is ghanese. Durward is passee. Durward is not unjust. Durward is surging. Durward is meddlesome. If someone is ghanese and beaming then they are passee. If Trixi is beaming and Trixi is not unjust then Trixi is meddlesome. If someone is unjust then they are localized. All meddlesome people are localized. If someone is localized and passee then they are surging. White, meddlesome people are ghanese. Christean is ghanese.", "logic": "\nLocalized(christean)\nMeddlesome(christean)\nBeaming(christean)\nUnjust(nessi)\nSurging(nessi)\nMeddlesome(nessi)\nBeaming(nessi)\nLocalized(trixi)\nPassee(trixi)\nnot Unjust(trixi)\nMeddlesome(trixi)\nGhanese(durward)\nPassee(durward)\nnot Unjust(durward)\nSurging(durward)\nMeddlesome(durward)\nforall x (Ghanese(x) and Beaming(x) -> Passee(x))\nBeaming(trixi) and not Unjust(trixi) -> Meddlesome(trixi)\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Localized(x) and Passee(x) -> Surging(x))\nforall x (Beaming(x) and Meddlesome(x) -> Ghanese(x))\n\nGhanese(christean)\n\nBeaming(christean) and Meddlesome(christean) and forall x (Beaming(x) and Meddlesome(x) -> Ghanese(x)) -> therefore Ghanese(christean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Corinna is rational. Corinna is centroidal. Corinna is fordable. Gilburt is serbian. Gilburt is excitable. Gilburt is centroidal. Gilburt is fordable. Zacharie is rational. Zacharie is darkling. Zacharie is not serbian. Zacharie is centroidal. Lulita is phoney. Lulita is darkling. Lulita is not serbian. Lulita is excitable. Lulita is centroidal. If someone is phoney and fordable then they are darkling. If Zacharie is fordable and Zacharie is not serbian then Zacharie is centroidal. If someone is serbian then they are rational. All centroidal people are rational. If someone is rational and darkling then they are excitable. White, centroidal people are phoney. Gilburt is not rational.", "logic": "\nRational(corinna)\nCentroidal(corinna)\nFordable(corinna)\nSerbian(gilburt)\nExcitable(gilburt)\nCentroidal(gilburt)\nFordable(gilburt)\nRational(zacharie)\nDarkling(zacharie)\nnot Serbian(zacharie)\nCentroidal(zacharie)\nPhoney(lulita)\nDarkling(lulita)\nnot Serbian(lulita)\nExcitable(lulita)\nCentroidal(lulita)\nforall x (Phoney(x) and Fordable(x) -> Darkling(x))\nFordable(zacharie) and not Serbian(zacharie) -> Centroidal(zacharie)\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Rational(x))\nforall x (Centroidal(x) -> Rational(x))\nforall x (Rational(x) and Darkling(x) -> Excitable(x))\nforall x (Fordable(x) and Centroidal(x) -> Phoney(x))\n\nnot Rational(gilburt)\n\nSerbian(gilburt) and forall x (Serbian(x) -> Rational(x)) -> therefore Rational(gilburt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Cami is defunct. Cami is billowy. Cami is sleeping. Emelina is paramount. Emelina is extra. Emelina is billowy. Emelina is sleeping. Blaine is defunct. Blaine is irksome. Blaine is not paramount. Blaine is billowy. Salem is perceptive. Salem is irksome. Salem is not paramount. Salem is extra. Salem is billowy. If someone is perceptive and sleeping then they are irksome. If Blaine is sleeping and Blaine is not paramount then Blaine is billowy. If someone is paramount then they are defunct. All billowy people are defunct. If someone is defunct and irksome then they are extra. White, billowy people are perceptive. Cami is irksome.", "logic": "\nDefunct(cami)\nBillowy(cami)\nSleeping(cami)\nParamount(emelina)\nExtra(emelina)\nBillowy(emelina)\nSleeping(emelina)\nDefunct(blaine)\nIrksome(blaine)\nnot Paramount(blaine)\nBillowy(blaine)\nPerceptive(salem)\nIrksome(salem)\nnot Paramount(salem)\nExtra(salem)\nBillowy(salem)\nforall x (Perceptive(x) and Sleeping(x) -> Irksome(x))\nSleeping(blaine) and not Paramount(blaine) -> Billowy(blaine)\nforall x (Paramount(x) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Billowy(x) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Defunct(x) and Irksome(x) -> Extra(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) and Billowy(x) -> Perceptive(x))\n\nIrksome(cami)\n\nSleeping(cami) and Billowy(cami) and forall x (Sleeping(x) and Billowy(x) -> Perceptive(x)) -> therefore Perceptive(cami) Perceptive(cami) and Sleeping(cami) and forall x (Perceptive(x) and Sleeping(x) -> Irksome(x)) -> therefore Irksome(cami)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Cecile is duckbill. Cecile is killable. Cecile is creative. Audry is painterly. Audry is false. Audry is killable. Audry is creative. Maddie is duckbill. Maddie is tiptop. Maddie is not painterly. Maddie is killable. Jaleh is caitiff. Jaleh is tiptop. Jaleh is not painterly. Jaleh is false. Jaleh is killable. If someone is caitiff and creative then they are tiptop. If Maddie is creative and Maddie is not painterly then Maddie is killable. If someone is painterly then they are duckbill. All killable people are duckbill. If someone is duckbill and tiptop then they are false. White, killable people are caitiff. Cecile is not tiptop.", "logic": "\nDuckbill(cecile)\nKillable(cecile)\nCreative(cecile)\nPainterly(audry)\nFalse(audry)\nKillable(audry)\nCreative(audry)\nDuckbill(maddie)\nTiptop(maddie)\nnot Painterly(maddie)\nKillable(maddie)\nCaitiff(jaleh)\nTiptop(jaleh)\nnot Painterly(jaleh)\nFalse(jaleh)\nKillable(jaleh)\nforall x (Caitiff(x) and Creative(x) -> Tiptop(x))\nCreative(maddie) and not Painterly(maddie) -> Killable(maddie)\nforall x (Painterly(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Tiptop(x) -> False(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) and Killable(x) -> Caitiff(x))\n\nnot Tiptop(cecile)\n\nCreative(cecile) and Killable(cecile) and forall x (Creative(x) and Killable(x) -> Caitiff(x)) -> therefore Caitiff(cecile) Caitiff(cecile) and Creative(cecile) and forall x (Caitiff(x) and Creative(x) -> Tiptop(x)) -> therefore Tiptop(cecile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Tirrell is pursued. Tirrell is polyhedral. Tirrell is burbly. Gerrard is supernal. Gerrard is purging. Gerrard is polyhedral. Gerrard is burbly. Dorris is pursued. Dorris is asinine. Dorris is not supernal. Dorris is polyhedral. Misti is venereal. Misti is asinine. Misti is not supernal. Misti is purging. Misti is polyhedral. If someone is venereal and burbly then they are asinine. If Dorris is burbly and Dorris is not supernal then Dorris is polyhedral. If someone is supernal then they are pursued. All polyhedral people are pursued. If someone is pursued and asinine then they are purging. White, polyhedral people are venereal. Tirrell is purging.", "logic": "\nPursued(tirrell)\nPolyhedral(tirrell)\nBurbly(tirrell)\nSupernal(gerrard)\nPurging(gerrard)\nPolyhedral(gerrard)\nBurbly(gerrard)\nPursued(dorris)\nAsinine(dorris)\nnot Supernal(dorris)\nPolyhedral(dorris)\nVenereal(misti)\nAsinine(misti)\nnot Supernal(misti)\nPurging(misti)\nPolyhedral(misti)\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Burbly(x) -> Asinine(x))\nBurbly(dorris) and not Supernal(dorris) -> Polyhedral(dorris)\nforall x (Supernal(x) -> Pursued(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Pursued(x))\nforall x (Pursued(x) and Asinine(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Burbly(x) and Polyhedral(x) -> Venereal(x))\n\nPurging(tirrell)\n\nBurbly(tirrell) and Polyhedral(tirrell) and forall x (Burbly(x) and Polyhedral(x) -> Venereal(x)) -> therefore Venereal(tirrell) Venereal(tirrell) and Burbly(tirrell) and forall x (Venereal(x) and Burbly(x) -> Asinine(x)) -> therefore Asinine(tirrell) Pursued(tirrell) and Asinine(tirrell) and forall x (Pursued(x) and Asinine(x) -> Purging(x)) -> therefore Purging(tirrell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Tess is gravelly. Tess is overdone. Tess is abiding. Cori is retarded. Cori is miniature. Cori is overdone. Cori is abiding. Wilfrid is gravelly. Wilfrid is grazed. Wilfrid is not retarded. Wilfrid is overdone. Madalena is catkinate. Madalena is grazed. Madalena is not retarded. Madalena is miniature. Madalena is overdone. If someone is catkinate and abiding then they are grazed. If Wilfrid is abiding and Wilfrid is not retarded then Wilfrid is overdone. If someone is retarded then they are gravelly. All overdone people are gravelly. If someone is gravelly and grazed then they are miniature. White, overdone people are catkinate. Tess is not miniature.", "logic": "\nGravelly(tess)\nOverdone(tess)\nAbiding(tess)\nRetarded(cori)\nMiniature(cori)\nOverdone(cori)\nAbiding(cori)\nGravelly(wilfrid)\nGrazed(wilfrid)\nnot Retarded(wilfrid)\nOverdone(wilfrid)\nCatkinate(madalena)\nGrazed(madalena)\nnot Retarded(madalena)\nMiniature(madalena)\nOverdone(madalena)\nforall x (Catkinate(x) and Abiding(x) -> Grazed(x))\nAbiding(wilfrid) and not Retarded(wilfrid) -> Overdone(wilfrid)\nforall x (Retarded(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Overdone(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) and Grazed(x) -> Miniature(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) and Overdone(x) -> Catkinate(x))\n\nnot Miniature(tess)\n\nAbiding(tess) and Overdone(tess) and forall x (Abiding(x) and Overdone(x) -> Catkinate(x)) -> therefore Catkinate(tess) Catkinate(tess) and Abiding(tess) and forall x (Catkinate(x) and Abiding(x) -> Grazed(x)) -> therefore Grazed(tess) Gravelly(tess) and Grazed(tess) and forall x (Gravelly(x) and Grazed(x) -> Miniature(x)) -> therefore Miniature(tess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Deena is depressed. Deena is conducive. Deena is sopranino. Kary is areolar. Kary is togged. Kary is conducive. Kary is sopranino. Audry is depressed. Audry is sexist. Audry is not areolar. Audry is conducive. Gretal is fatal. Gretal is sexist. Gretal is not areolar. Gretal is togged. Gretal is conducive. If someone is fatal and sopranino then they are sexist. If Audry is sopranino and Audry is not areolar then Audry is conducive. If someone is areolar then they are depressed. All conducive people are depressed. If someone is depressed and sexist then they are togged. White, conducive people are fatal. Audry is not fatal.", "logic": "\nDepressed(deena)\nConducive(deena)\nSopranino(deena)\nAreolar(kary)\nTogged(kary)\nConducive(kary)\nSopranino(kary)\nDepressed(audry)\nSexist(audry)\nnot Areolar(audry)\nConducive(audry)\nFatal(gretal)\nSexist(gretal)\nnot Areolar(gretal)\nTogged(gretal)\nConducive(gretal)\nforall x (Fatal(x) and Sopranino(x) -> Sexist(x))\nSopranino(audry) and not Areolar(audry) -> Conducive(audry)\nforall x (Areolar(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Conducive(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Depressed(x) and Sexist(x) -> Togged(x))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) and Conducive(x) -> Fatal(x))\n\nnot Fatal(audry)\n\nforall x (Sopranino(x) and Conducive(x) -> Fatal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Hedwig is agrarian. Hedwig is unmade. Hedwig is rifled. Alford is incensed. Alford is technical. Alford is unmade. Alford is rifled. Josefina is agrarian. Josefina is ephemeral. Josefina is not incensed. Josefina is unmade. Nickie is ectodermal. Nickie is ephemeral. Nickie is not incensed. Nickie is technical. Nickie is unmade. If someone is ectodermal and rifled then they are ephemeral. If Josefina is rifled and Josefina is not incensed then Josefina is unmade. If someone is incensed then they are agrarian. All unmade people are agrarian. If someone is agrarian and ephemeral then they are technical. White, unmade people are ectodermal. Josefina is rifled.", "logic": "\nAgrarian(hedwig)\nUnmade(hedwig)\nRifled(hedwig)\nIncensed(alford)\nTechnical(alford)\nUnmade(alford)\nRifled(alford)\nAgrarian(josefina)\nEphemeral(josefina)\nnot Incensed(josefina)\nUnmade(josefina)\nEctodermal(nickie)\nEphemeral(nickie)\nnot Incensed(nickie)\nTechnical(nickie)\nUnmade(nickie)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Rifled(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nRifled(josefina) and not Incensed(josefina) -> Unmade(josefina)\nforall x (Incensed(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) and Ephemeral(x) -> Technical(x))\nforall x (Rifled(x) and Unmade(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\n\nRifled(josefina)\n\nRifled(josefina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Karissa is aperiodic. Karissa is noticed. Karissa is jesuitic. Nichols is congruent. Nichols is trying. Nichols is noticed. Nichols is jesuitic. Hailee is aperiodic. Hailee is known. Hailee is not congruent. Hailee is noticed. Jessamine is leal. Jessamine is known. Jessamine is not congruent. Jessamine is trying. Jessamine is noticed. If someone is leal and jesuitic then they are known. If Hailee is jesuitic and Hailee is not congruent then Hailee is noticed. If someone is congruent then they are aperiodic. All noticed people are aperiodic. If someone is aperiodic and known then they are trying. White, noticed people are leal. Karissa is not congruent.", "logic": "\nAperiodic(karissa)\nNoticed(karissa)\nJesuitic(karissa)\nCongruent(nichols)\nTrying(nichols)\nNoticed(nichols)\nJesuitic(nichols)\nAperiodic(hailee)\nKnown(hailee)\nnot Congruent(hailee)\nNoticed(hailee)\nLeal(jessamine)\nKnown(jessamine)\nnot Congruent(jessamine)\nTrying(jessamine)\nNoticed(jessamine)\nforall x (Leal(x) and Jesuitic(x) -> Known(x))\nJesuitic(hailee) and not Congruent(hailee) -> Noticed(hailee)\nforall x (Congruent(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Noticed(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Aperiodic(x) and Known(x) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Jesuitic(x) and Noticed(x) -> Leal(x))\n\nnot Congruent(karissa)\n\nnot Congruent(karissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Cherida is gullible. Cherida is reedy. Cherida is unfeigned. Torre is beheaded. Torre is glowering. Torre is reedy. Torre is unfeigned. Archon is gullible. Archon is stately. Archon is not beheaded. Archon is reedy. Kendrick is unfenced. Kendrick is stately. Kendrick is not beheaded. Kendrick is glowering. Kendrick is reedy. If someone is unfenced and unfeigned then they are stately. If Archon is unfeigned and Archon is not beheaded then Archon is reedy. If someone is beheaded then they are gullible. All reedy people are gullible. If someone is gullible and stately then they are glowering. White, reedy people are unfenced. Kendrick is unfeigned.", "logic": "\nGullible(cherida)\nReedy(cherida)\nUnfeigned(cherida)\nBeheaded(torre)\nGlowering(torre)\nReedy(torre)\nUnfeigned(torre)\nGullible(archon)\nStately(archon)\nnot Beheaded(archon)\nReedy(archon)\nUnfenced(kendrick)\nStately(kendrick)\nnot Beheaded(kendrick)\nGlowering(kendrick)\nReedy(kendrick)\nforall x (Unfenced(x) and Unfeigned(x) -> Stately(x))\nUnfeigned(archon) and not Beheaded(archon) -> Reedy(archon)\nforall x (Beheaded(x) -> Gullible(x))\nforall x (Reedy(x) -> Gullible(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) and Stately(x) -> Glowering(x))\nforall x (Unfeigned(x) and Reedy(x) -> Unfenced(x))\n\nUnfeigned(kendrick)\n\nUnfeigned(kendrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Kellina is dull. Mureil is parasitic. Becki is parasitic. Quiet, blighted people are unsmooth. If someone is parasitic then they are unsmooth. If someone is bituminoid and not blighted then they are unsmooth. If Becki is bituminoid and Becki is dull then Becki is not hulking. If someone is hulking then they are blithe. If someone is unsmooth then they are hulking. If someone is dull then they are hulking. All bituminoid people are dull. Kellina is dull.", "logic": "\nDull(kellina)\nParasitic(mureil)\nParasitic(becki)\nforall x (Parasitic(x) and Blighted(x) -> Unsmooth(x))\nforall x (Parasitic(x) -> Unsmooth(x))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) and not Blighted(x) -> Unsmooth(x))\nBituminoid(becki) and Dull(becki) -> not Hulking(becki)\nforall x (Hulking(x) -> Blithe(x))\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Hulking(x))\nforall x (Dull(x) -> Hulking(x))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> Dull(x))\n\nDull(kellina)\n\ntherefore Dull(kellina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Henryetta is false. Dwane is quavering. Mohamed is quavering. Quiet, congestive people are untellable. If someone is quavering then they are untellable. If someone is tight and not congestive then they are untellable. If Mohamed is tight and Mohamed is false then Mohamed is not pretty. If someone is pretty then they are exclusive. If someone is untellable then they are pretty. If someone is false then they are pretty. All tight people are false. Mohamed is not quavering.", "logic": "\nFalse(henryetta)\nQuavering(dwane)\nQuavering(mohamed)\nforall x (Quavering(x) and Congestive(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Quavering(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and not Congestive(x) -> Untellable(x))\nTight(mohamed) and False(mohamed) -> not Pretty(mohamed)\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Exclusive(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (False(x) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> False(x))\n\nnot Quavering(mohamed)\n\ntherefore Quavering(mohamed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Marylee is xiii. Helli is spatulate. Noella is spatulate. Quiet, unfearing people are unwilled. If someone is spatulate then they are unwilled. If someone is ersatz and not unfearing then they are unwilled. If Noella is ersatz and Noella is xiii then Noella is not monogynic. If someone is monogynic then they are sacral. If someone is unwilled then they are monogynic. If someone is xiii then they are monogynic. All ersatz people are xiii. Marylee is monogynic.", "logic": "\nXiii(marylee)\nSpatulate(helli)\nSpatulate(noella)\nforall x (Spatulate(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Unwilled(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Unwilled(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) and not Unfearing(x) -> Unwilled(x))\nErsatz(noella) and Xiii(noella) -> not Monogynic(noella)\nforall x (Monogynic(x) -> Sacral(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nforall x (Xiii(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) -> Xiii(x))\n\nMonogynic(marylee)\n\nXiii(marylee) and forall x (Xiii(x) -> Monogynic(x)) -> therefore Monogynic(marylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Michell is aphonic. Willi is wriggling. Wendi is wriggling. Quiet, unreleased people are eighteen. If someone is wriggling then they are eighteen. If someone is propelling and not unreleased then they are eighteen. If Wendi is propelling and Wendi is aphonic then Wendi is not macho. If someone is macho then they are cacuminal. If someone is eighteen then they are macho. If someone is aphonic then they are macho. All propelling people are aphonic. Willi is not eighteen.", "logic": "\nAphonic(michell)\nWriggling(willi)\nWriggling(wendi)\nforall x (Wriggling(x) and Unreleased(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Propelling(x) and not Unreleased(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nPropelling(wendi) and Aphonic(wendi) -> not Macho(wendi)\nforall x (Macho(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Macho(x))\nforall x (Aphonic(x) -> Macho(x))\nforall x (Propelling(x) -> Aphonic(x))\n\nnot Eighteen(willi)\n\nWriggling(willi) and forall x (Wriggling(x) -> Eighteen(x)) -> therefore Eighteen(willi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Leorah is utilized. Neilla is hooked. Benn is hooked. Quiet, sudsy people are copular. If someone is hooked then they are copular. If someone is patterned and not sudsy then they are copular. If Benn is patterned and Benn is utilized then Benn is not causeless. If someone is causeless then they are scalelike. If someone is copular then they are causeless. If someone is utilized then they are causeless. All patterned people are utilized. Leorah is scalelike.", "logic": "\nUtilized(leorah)\nHooked(neilla)\nHooked(benn)\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Sudsy(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Patterned(x) and not Sudsy(x) -> Copular(x))\nPatterned(benn) and Utilized(benn) -> not Causeless(benn)\nforall x (Causeless(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Copular(x) -> Causeless(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) -> Causeless(x))\nforall x (Patterned(x) -> Utilized(x))\n\nScalelike(leorah)\n\nUtilized(leorah) and forall x (Utilized(x) -> Causeless(x)) -> therefore Causeless(leorah) Causeless(leorah) and forall x (Causeless(x) -> Scalelike(x)) -> therefore Scalelike(leorah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Lindi is synonymous. Rahel is mucky. Tildi is mucky. Quiet, unlaced people are unequal. If someone is mucky then they are unequal. If someone is mandean and not unlaced then they are unequal. If Tildi is mandean and Tildi is synonymous then Tildi is not cymose. If someone is cymose then they are cliched. If someone is unequal then they are cymose. If someone is synonymous then they are cymose. All mandean people are synonymous. Lindi is not cliched.", "logic": "\nSynonymous(lindi)\nMucky(rahel)\nMucky(tildi)\nforall x (Mucky(x) and Unlaced(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Mucky(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Mandean(x) and not Unlaced(x) -> Unequal(x))\nMandean(tildi) and Synonymous(tildi) -> not Cymose(tildi)\nforall x (Cymose(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Mandean(x) -> Synonymous(x))\n\nnot Cliched(lindi)\n\nSynonymous(lindi) and forall x (Synonymous(x) -> Cymose(x)) -> therefore Cymose(lindi) Cymose(lindi) and forall x (Cymose(x) -> Cliched(x)) -> therefore Cliched(lindi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Rudy is denuded. Marylinda is hatless. Lorry is hatless. Quiet, fashioned people are impudent. If someone is hatless then they are impudent. If someone is persisting and not fashioned then they are impudent. If Lorry is persisting and Lorry is denuded then Lorry is not initiative. If someone is initiative then they are sinitic. If someone is impudent then they are initiative. If someone is denuded then they are initiative. All persisting people are denuded. Lorry is sinitic.", "logic": "\nDenuded(rudy)\nHatless(marylinda)\nHatless(lorry)\nforall x (Hatless(x) and Fashioned(x) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Hatless(x) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Persisting(x) and not Fashioned(x) -> Impudent(x))\nPersisting(lorry) and Denuded(lorry) -> not Initiative(lorry)\nforall x (Initiative(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Persisting(x) -> Denuded(x))\n\nSinitic(lorry)\n\nHatless(lorry) and forall x (Hatless(x) -> Impudent(x)) -> therefore Impudent(lorry) Impudent(lorry) and forall x (Impudent(x) -> Initiative(x)) -> therefore Initiative(lorry) Initiative(lorry) and forall x (Initiative(x) -> Sinitic(x)) -> therefore Sinitic(lorry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Margarete is lithesome. Sula is centennial. Mack is centennial. Quiet, busy people are uncut. If someone is centennial then they are uncut. If someone is asymmetric and not busy then they are uncut. If Mack is asymmetric and Mack is lithesome then Mack is not boiled. If someone is boiled then they are thinkable. If someone is uncut then they are boiled. If someone is lithesome then they are boiled. All asymmetric people are lithesome. Mack is not thinkable.", "logic": "\nLithesome(margarete)\nCentennial(sula)\nCentennial(mack)\nforall x (Centennial(x) and Busy(x) -> Uncut(x))\nforall x (Centennial(x) -> Uncut(x))\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) and not Busy(x) -> Uncut(x))\nAsymmetric(mack) and Lithesome(mack) -> not Boiled(mack)\nforall x (Boiled(x) -> Thinkable(x))\nforall x (Uncut(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> Boiled(x))\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) -> Lithesome(x))\n\nnot Thinkable(mack)\n\nCentennial(mack) and forall x (Centennial(x) -> Uncut(x)) -> therefore Uncut(mack) Uncut(mack) and forall x (Uncut(x) -> Boiled(x)) -> therefore Boiled(mack) Boiled(mack) and forall x (Boiled(x) -> Thinkable(x)) -> therefore Thinkable(mack)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Merola is frostian. Moses is axile. Cristie is axile. Quiet, gelid people are custodial. If someone is axile then they are custodial. If someone is bolometric and not gelid then they are custodial. If Cristie is bolometric and Cristie is frostian then Cristie is not spinnable. If someone is spinnable then they are homoerotic. If someone is custodial then they are spinnable. If someone is frostian then they are spinnable. All bolometric people are frostian. Moses is not frostian.", "logic": "\nFrostian(merola)\nAxile(moses)\nAxile(cristie)\nforall x (Axile(x) and Gelid(x) -> Custodial(x))\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Custodial(x))\nforall x (Bolometric(x) and not Gelid(x) -> Custodial(x))\nBolometric(cristie) and Frostian(cristie) -> not Spinnable(cristie)\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Custodial(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Frostian(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Bolometric(x) -> Frostian(x))\n\nnot Frostian(moses)\n\nforall x (Bolometric(x) -> Frostian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Lizbeth is sparkly. Emlynne is pumped. Redford is pumped. Quiet, protanopic people are literary. If someone is pumped then they are literary. If someone is arborous and not protanopic then they are literary. If Redford is arborous and Redford is sparkly then Redford is not zodiacal. If someone is zodiacal then they are fazed. If someone is literary then they are zodiacal. If someone is sparkly then they are zodiacal. All arborous people are sparkly. Redford is sparkly.", "logic": "\nSparkly(lizbeth)\nPumped(emlynne)\nPumped(redford)\nforall x (Pumped(x) and Protanopic(x) -> Literary(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) -> Literary(x))\nforall x (Arborous(x) and not Protanopic(x) -> Literary(x))\nArborous(redford) and Sparkly(redford) -> not Zodiacal(redford)\nforall x (Zodiacal(x) -> Fazed(x))\nforall x (Literary(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\nforall x (Sparkly(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\nforall x (Arborous(x) -> Sparkly(x))\n\nSparkly(redford)\n\nforall x (Arborous(x) -> Sparkly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Aloisia is pastelike. Abdul is haywire. Cobb is haywire. Quiet, synergetic people are shona. If someone is haywire then they are shona. If someone is indolent and not synergetic then they are shona. If Cobb is indolent and Cobb is pastelike then Cobb is not pineal. If someone is pineal then they are raptorial. If someone is shona then they are pineal. If someone is pastelike then they are pineal. All indolent people are pastelike. Aloisia is not shona.", "logic": "\nPastelike(aloisia)\nHaywire(abdul)\nHaywire(cobb)\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Synergetic(x) -> Shona(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Shona(x))\nforall x (Indolent(x) and not Synergetic(x) -> Shona(x))\nIndolent(cobb) and Pastelike(cobb) -> not Pineal(cobb)\nforall x (Pineal(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Pineal(x))\nforall x (Pastelike(x) -> Pineal(x))\nforall x (Indolent(x) -> Pastelike(x))\n\nnot Shona(aloisia)\n\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Synergetic(x) -> Shona(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Rickie is wholemeal. Gasper is basidial. Nyssa is basidial. Quiet, vile people are beltless. If someone is basidial then they are beltless. If someone is apparent and not vile then they are beltless. If Nyssa is apparent and Nyssa is wholemeal then Nyssa is not drifting. If someone is drifting then they are cystic. If someone is beltless then they are drifting. If someone is wholemeal then they are drifting. All apparent people are wholemeal. Rickie is vile.", "logic": "\nWholemeal(rickie)\nBasidial(gasper)\nBasidial(nyssa)\nforall x (Basidial(x) and Vile(x) -> Beltless(x))\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Beltless(x))\nforall x (Apparent(x) and not Vile(x) -> Beltless(x))\nApparent(nyssa) and Wholemeal(nyssa) -> not Drifting(nyssa)\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> Cystic(x))\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Wholemeal(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\n\nVile(rickie)\n\nVile(rickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Abbie is supposed. Rafael is lumbering. Irving is lumbering. Quiet, simian people are streaked. If someone is lumbering then they are streaked. If someone is fateful and not simian then they are streaked. If Irving is fateful and Irving is supposed then Irving is not diatomic. If someone is diatomic then they are radical. If someone is streaked then they are diatomic. If someone is supposed then they are diatomic. All fateful people are supposed. Rafael is not fateful.", "logic": "\nSupposed(abbie)\nLumbering(rafael)\nLumbering(irving)\nforall x (Lumbering(x) and Simian(x) -> Streaked(x))\nforall x (Lumbering(x) -> Streaked(x))\nforall x (Fateful(x) and not Simian(x) -> Streaked(x))\nFateful(irving) and Supposed(irving) -> not Diatomic(irving)\nforall x (Diatomic(x) -> Radical(x))\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Diatomic(x))\nforall x (Supposed(x) -> Diatomic(x))\nforall x (Fateful(x) -> Supposed(x))\n\nnot Fateful(rafael)\n\nnot Fateful(rafael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Shalna is swift. Eolande is vulvar. Leta is vulvar. Quiet, benzenoid people are aspectual. If someone is vulvar then they are aspectual. If someone is visceral and not benzenoid then they are aspectual. If Leta is visceral and Leta is swift then Leta is not normative. If someone is normative then they are sent. If someone is aspectual then they are normative. If someone is swift then they are normative. All visceral people are swift. Eolande is benzenoid.", "logic": "\nSwift(shalna)\nVulvar(eolande)\nVulvar(leta)\nforall x (Vulvar(x) and Benzenoid(x) -> Aspectual(x))\nforall x (Vulvar(x) -> Aspectual(x))\nforall x (Visceral(x) and not Benzenoid(x) -> Aspectual(x))\nVisceral(leta) and Swift(leta) -> not Normative(leta)\nforall x (Normative(x) -> Sent(x))\nforall x (Aspectual(x) -> Normative(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) -> Normative(x))\nforall x (Visceral(x) -> Swift(x))\n\nBenzenoid(eolande)\n\nBenzenoid(eolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Geralda is dazzling. Edouard is pretended. Robinson is pretended. Quiet, lowland people are clammy. If someone is pretended then they are clammy. If someone is prolate and not lowland then they are clammy. If Robinson is prolate and Robinson is dazzling then Robinson is not spiritless. If someone is spiritless then they are saline. If someone is clammy then they are spiritless. If someone is dazzling then they are spiritless. All prolate people are dazzling. Robinson is not lowland.", "logic": "\nDazzling(geralda)\nPretended(edouard)\nPretended(robinson)\nforall x (Pretended(x) and Lowland(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Pretended(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Prolate(x) and not Lowland(x) -> Clammy(x))\nProlate(robinson) and Dazzling(robinson) -> not Spiritless(robinson)\nforall x (Spiritless(x) -> Saline(x))\nforall x (Clammy(x) -> Spiritless(x))\nforall x (Dazzling(x) -> Spiritless(x))\nforall x (Prolate(x) -> Dazzling(x))\n\nnot Lowland(robinson)\n\nnot Lowland(robinson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Meghan is tribal. Emelyne is required. Herminia is required. Quiet, nonopening people are pallid. If someone is required then they are pallid. If someone is infectious and not nonopening then they are pallid. If Herminia is infectious and Herminia is tribal then Herminia is not even. If someone is even then they are loveable. If someone is pallid then they are even. If someone is tribal then they are even. All infectious people are tribal. Meghan is infectious.", "logic": "\nTribal(meghan)\nRequired(emelyne)\nRequired(herminia)\nforall x (Required(x) and Nonopening(x) -> Pallid(x))\nforall x (Required(x) -> Pallid(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) and not Nonopening(x) -> Pallid(x))\nInfectious(herminia) and Tribal(herminia) -> not Even(herminia)\nforall x (Even(x) -> Loveable(x))\nforall x (Pallid(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Tribal(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Tribal(x))\n\nInfectious(meghan)\n\nInfectious(meghan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Starlene is downstair. Starlene is chiasmatic. Starlene is sleety. Starlene is vociferous. Starlene is sturdy. Starlene is miniscule. Starlene is eclectic. Manfred is sleety. Manfred is sturdy. Manfred is miniscule. If something is miniscule then it is sturdy. All vociferous, sturdy things are miniscule. If something is sleety and eclectic then it is vociferous. If Starlene is vociferous and Starlene is downstair then Starlene is sturdy. If something is downstair and sturdy then it is eclectic. All vociferous things are chiasmatic. Quiet, chiasmatic things are sleety. All sturdy things are eclectic. Starlene is eclectic.", "logic": "\nDownstair(starlene)\nChiasmatic(starlene)\nSleety(starlene)\nVociferous(starlene)\nSturdy(starlene)\nMiniscule(starlene)\nEclectic(starlene)\nSleety(manfred)\nSturdy(manfred)\nMiniscule(manfred)\nforall x (Miniscule(x) -> Sturdy(x))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) and Sturdy(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nforall x (Sleety(x) and Eclectic(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nVociferous(starlene) and Downstair(starlene) -> Sturdy(starlene)\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Sturdy(x) -> Eclectic(x))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Chiasmatic(x))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) and Chiasmatic(x) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Sturdy(x) -> Eclectic(x))\n\nEclectic(starlene)\n\ntherefore Eclectic(starlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Candis is liquified. Candis is romaic. Candis is rifled. Candis is bedewed. Candis is numeral. Candis is knobbed. Candis is causative. Rosalinde is rifled. Rosalinde is numeral. Rosalinde is knobbed. If something is knobbed then it is numeral. All bedewed, numeral things are knobbed. If something is rifled and causative then it is bedewed. If Candis is bedewed and Candis is liquified then Candis is numeral. If something is liquified and numeral then it is causative. All bedewed things are romaic. Quiet, romaic things are rifled. All numeral things are causative. Rosalinde is not numeral.", "logic": "\nLiquified(candis)\nRomaic(candis)\nRifled(candis)\nBedewed(candis)\nNumeral(candis)\nKnobbed(candis)\nCausative(candis)\nRifled(rosalinde)\nNumeral(rosalinde)\nKnobbed(rosalinde)\nforall x (Knobbed(x) -> Numeral(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) and Numeral(x) -> Knobbed(x))\nforall x (Rifled(x) and Causative(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nBedewed(candis) and Liquified(candis) -> Numeral(candis)\nforall x (Liquified(x) and Numeral(x) -> Causative(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Romaic(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) and Romaic(x) -> Rifled(x))\nforall x (Numeral(x) -> Causative(x))\n\nnot Numeral(rosalinde)\n\ntherefore Numeral(rosalinde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Inga is raring. Inga is invitatory. Inga is honied. Inga is dehiscent. Inga is outdoorsy. Inga is aneurysmal. Inga is postnatal. Zed is honied. Zed is outdoorsy. Zed is aneurysmal. If something is aneurysmal then it is outdoorsy. All dehiscent, outdoorsy things are aneurysmal. If something is honied and postnatal then it is dehiscent. If Inga is dehiscent and Inga is raring then Inga is outdoorsy. If something is raring and outdoorsy then it is postnatal. All dehiscent things are invitatory. Quiet, invitatory things are honied. All outdoorsy things are postnatal. Zed is postnatal.", "logic": "\nRaring(inga)\nInvitatory(inga)\nHonied(inga)\nDehiscent(inga)\nOutdoorsy(inga)\nAneurysmal(inga)\nPostnatal(inga)\nHonied(zed)\nOutdoorsy(zed)\nAneurysmal(zed)\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Dehiscent(x) and Outdoorsy(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Honied(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Dehiscent(x))\nDehiscent(inga) and Raring(inga) -> Outdoorsy(inga)\nforall x (Raring(x) and Outdoorsy(x) -> Postnatal(x))\nforall x (Dehiscent(x) -> Invitatory(x))\nforall x (Dehiscent(x) and Invitatory(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) -> Postnatal(x))\n\nPostnatal(zed)\n\nOutdoorsy(zed) and forall x (Outdoorsy(x) -> Postnatal(x)) -> therefore Postnatal(zed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Whitby is dropsical. Whitby is trustful. Whitby is vegetive. Whitby is cumuliform. Whitby is vested. Whitby is dressy. Whitby is bimetal. Bary is vegetive. Bary is vested. Bary is dressy. If something is dressy then it is vested. All cumuliform, vested things are dressy. If something is vegetive and bimetal then it is cumuliform. If Whitby is cumuliform and Whitby is dropsical then Whitby is vested. If something is dropsical and vested then it is bimetal. All cumuliform things are trustful. Quiet, trustful things are vegetive. All vested things are bimetal. Bary is not bimetal.", "logic": "\nDropsical(whitby)\nTrustful(whitby)\nVegetive(whitby)\nCumuliform(whitby)\nVested(whitby)\nDressy(whitby)\nBimetal(whitby)\nVegetive(bary)\nVested(bary)\nDressy(bary)\nforall x (Dressy(x) -> Vested(x))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) and Vested(x) -> Dressy(x))\nforall x (Vegetive(x) and Bimetal(x) -> Cumuliform(x))\nCumuliform(whitby) and Dropsical(whitby) -> Vested(whitby)\nforall x (Dropsical(x) and Vested(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) -> Trustful(x))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) and Trustful(x) -> Vegetive(x))\nforall x (Vested(x) -> Bimetal(x))\n\nnot Bimetal(bary)\n\nVested(bary) and forall x (Vested(x) -> Bimetal(x)) -> therefore Bimetal(bary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Hadley is barky. Hadley is allopathic. Hadley is anabatic. Hadley is transient. Hadley is textual. Hadley is revered. Hadley is habitable. Belicia is anabatic. Belicia is textual. Belicia is revered. If something is revered then it is textual. All transient, textual things are revered. If something is anabatic and habitable then it is transient. If Hadley is transient and Hadley is barky then Hadley is textual. If something is barky and textual then it is habitable. All transient things are allopathic. Quiet, allopathic things are anabatic. All textual things are habitable. Belicia is transient.", "logic": "\nBarky(hadley)\nAllopathic(hadley)\nAnabatic(hadley)\nTransient(hadley)\nTextual(hadley)\nRevered(hadley)\nHabitable(hadley)\nAnabatic(belicia)\nTextual(belicia)\nRevered(belicia)\nforall x (Revered(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) and Textual(x) -> Revered(x))\nforall x (Anabatic(x) and Habitable(x) -> Transient(x))\nTransient(hadley) and Barky(hadley) -> Textual(hadley)\nforall x (Barky(x) and Textual(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) and Allopathic(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Habitable(x))\n\nTransient(belicia)\n\nTextual(belicia) and forall x (Textual(x) -> Habitable(x)) -> therefore Habitable(belicia) Anabatic(belicia) and Habitable(belicia) and forall x (Anabatic(x) and Habitable(x) -> Transient(x)) -> therefore Transient(belicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Kendra is volcanic. Kendra is farseeing. Kendra is bookish. Kendra is lilting. Kendra is careless. Kendra is foetid. Kendra is amnesiac. Cherri is bookish. Cherri is careless. Cherri is foetid. If something is foetid then it is careless. All lilting, careless things are foetid. If something is bookish and amnesiac then it is lilting. If Kendra is lilting and Kendra is volcanic then Kendra is careless. If something is volcanic and careless then it is amnesiac. All lilting things are farseeing. Quiet, farseeing things are bookish. All careless things are amnesiac. Cherri is not lilting.", "logic": "\nVolcanic(kendra)\nFarseeing(kendra)\nBookish(kendra)\nLilting(kendra)\nCareless(kendra)\nFoetid(kendra)\nAmnesiac(kendra)\nBookish(cherri)\nCareless(cherri)\nFoetid(cherri)\nforall x (Foetid(x) -> Careless(x))\nforall x (Lilting(x) and Careless(x) -> Foetid(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) and Amnesiac(x) -> Lilting(x))\nLilting(kendra) and Volcanic(kendra) -> Careless(kendra)\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Careless(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Lilting(x) -> Farseeing(x))\nforall x (Lilting(x) and Farseeing(x) -> Bookish(x))\nforall x (Careless(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\n\nnot Lilting(cherri)\n\nCareless(cherri) and forall x (Careless(x) -> Amnesiac(x)) -> therefore Amnesiac(cherri) Bookish(cherri) and Amnesiac(cherri) and forall x (Bookish(x) and Amnesiac(x) -> Lilting(x)) -> therefore Lilting(cherri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Brewer is covert. Brewer is sincere. Brewer is waterborne. Brewer is roseate. Brewer is memorable. Brewer is passant. Brewer is uncultured. Moyra is waterborne. Moyra is memorable. Moyra is passant. If something is passant then it is memorable. All roseate, memorable things are passant. If something is waterborne and uncultured then it is roseate. If Brewer is roseate and Brewer is covert then Brewer is memorable. If something is covert and memorable then it is uncultured. All roseate things are sincere. Quiet, sincere things are waterborne. All memorable things are uncultured. Moyra is sincere.", "logic": "\nCovert(brewer)\nSincere(brewer)\nWaterborne(brewer)\nRoseate(brewer)\nMemorable(brewer)\nPassant(brewer)\nUncultured(brewer)\nWaterborne(moyra)\nMemorable(moyra)\nPassant(moyra)\nforall x (Passant(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Roseate(x) and Memorable(x) -> Passant(x))\nforall x (Waterborne(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Roseate(x))\nRoseate(brewer) and Covert(brewer) -> Memorable(brewer)\nforall x (Covert(x) and Memorable(x) -> Uncultured(x))\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> Sincere(x))\nforall x (Roseate(x) and Sincere(x) -> Waterborne(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) -> Uncultured(x))\n\nSincere(moyra)\n\nMemorable(moyra) and forall x (Memorable(x) -> Uncultured(x)) -> therefore Uncultured(moyra) Waterborne(moyra) and Uncultured(moyra) and forall x (Waterborne(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Roseate(x)) -> therefore Roseate(moyra) Roseate(moyra) and forall x (Roseate(x) -> Sincere(x)) -> therefore Sincere(moyra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Sergeant is scrimy. Sergeant is mediocre. Sergeant is unused. Sergeant is zimbabwean. Sergeant is tumescent. Sergeant is dimmed. Sergeant is gonadal. Adeline is unused. Adeline is tumescent. Adeline is dimmed. If something is dimmed then it is tumescent. All zimbabwean, tumescent things are dimmed. If something is unused and gonadal then it is zimbabwean. If Sergeant is zimbabwean and Sergeant is scrimy then Sergeant is tumescent. If something is scrimy and tumescent then it is gonadal. All zimbabwean things are mediocre. Quiet, mediocre things are unused. All tumescent things are gonadal. Adeline is not mediocre.", "logic": "\nScrimy(sergeant)\nMediocre(sergeant)\nUnused(sergeant)\nZimbabwean(sergeant)\nTumescent(sergeant)\nDimmed(sergeant)\nGonadal(sergeant)\nUnused(adeline)\nTumescent(adeline)\nDimmed(adeline)\nforall x (Dimmed(x) -> Tumescent(x))\nforall x (Zimbabwean(x) and Tumescent(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Unused(x) and Gonadal(x) -> Zimbabwean(x))\nZimbabwean(sergeant) and Scrimy(sergeant) -> Tumescent(sergeant)\nforall x (Scrimy(x) and Tumescent(x) -> Gonadal(x))\nforall x (Zimbabwean(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Zimbabwean(x) and Mediocre(x) -> Unused(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) -> Gonadal(x))\n\nnot Mediocre(adeline)\n\nTumescent(adeline) and forall x (Tumescent(x) -> Gonadal(x)) -> therefore Gonadal(adeline) Unused(adeline) and Gonadal(adeline) and forall x (Unused(x) and Gonadal(x) -> Zimbabwean(x)) -> therefore Zimbabwean(adeline) Zimbabwean(adeline) and forall x (Zimbabwean(x) -> Mediocre(x)) -> therefore Mediocre(adeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "The dawson grout the charmain. The dawson is elysian. The dawson is wilted. The dawson is crosstown. The dawson reclassify the charmain. The dawson butylate the charmain. The charmain grout the dawson. If someone is crosstown then they like the charmain. If someone butylate the dawson then the dawson is permeating. If someone is crosstown and they like the charmain then they see the dawson. If someone butylate the charmain then they are wilted. If someone reclassify the dawson then they are crosstown. If someone butylate the dawson and they see the charmain then the charmain is crosstown. If someone reclassify the dawson then the dawson grout the charmain. If someone is renascent and they eat the charmain then they like the charmain. The dawson is crosstown.", "logic": "\nGrout(dawson, charmain)\nElysian(dawson)\nWilted(dawson)\nCrosstown(dawson)\nReclassify(dawson, charmain)\nButylate(dawson, charmain)\nGrout(charmain, dawson)\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> Reclassify(x, charmain))\nforall x (Butylate(x, dawson) -> Permeating(dawson))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) and Reclassify(x, charmain) -> Butylate(x, dawson))\nforall x (Butylate(x, charmain) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, dawson) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Butylate(x, dawson) and Butylate(x, charmain) -> Crosstown(charmain))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, dawson) -> Grout(dawson, charmain))\nforall x (Renascent(x) and Grout(x, charmain) -> Reclassify(x, charmain))\n\nCrosstown(dawson)\n\ntherefore Crosstown(dawson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The kacie repair the harley. The kacie is mousey. The kacie is curatorial. The kacie is apogamic. The kacie watch the harley. The kacie disquiet the harley. The harley repair the kacie. If someone is apogamic then they like the harley. If someone disquiet the kacie then the kacie is thrilled. If someone is apogamic and they like the harley then they see the kacie. If someone disquiet the harley then they are curatorial. If someone watch the kacie then they are apogamic. If someone disquiet the kacie and they see the harley then the harley is apogamic. If someone watch the kacie then the kacie repair the harley. If someone is substitute and they eat the harley then they like the harley. The kacie is not curatorial.", "logic": "\nRepair(kacie, harley)\nMousey(kacie)\nCuratorial(kacie)\nApogamic(kacie)\nWatch(kacie, harley)\nDisquiet(kacie, harley)\nRepair(harley, kacie)\nforall x (Apogamic(x) -> Watch(x, harley))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, kacie) -> Thrilled(kacie))\nforall x (Apogamic(x) and Watch(x, harley) -> Disquiet(x, kacie))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, harley) -> Curatorial(x))\nforall x (Watch(x, kacie) -> Apogamic(x))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, kacie) and Disquiet(x, harley) -> Apogamic(harley))\nforall x (Watch(x, kacie) -> Repair(kacie, harley))\nforall x (Substitute(x) and Repair(x, harley) -> Watch(x, harley))\n\nnot Curatorial(kacie)\n\ntherefore Curatorial(kacie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The coleen reprove the bellamy. The coleen is uncensored. The coleen is undraped. The coleen is lateral. The coleen company the bellamy. The coleen hedgehop the bellamy. The bellamy reprove the coleen. If someone is lateral then they like the bellamy. If someone hedgehop the coleen then the coleen is autistic. If someone is lateral and they like the bellamy then they see the coleen. If someone hedgehop the bellamy then they are undraped. If someone company the coleen then they are lateral. If someone hedgehop the coleen and they see the bellamy then the bellamy is lateral. If someone company the coleen then the coleen reprove the bellamy. If someone is fungible and they eat the bellamy then they like the bellamy. The coleen hedgehop the coleen.", "logic": "\nReprove(coleen, bellamy)\nUncensored(coleen)\nUndraped(coleen)\nLateral(coleen)\nCompany(coleen, bellamy)\nHedgehop(coleen, bellamy)\nReprove(bellamy, coleen)\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Company(x, bellamy))\nforall x (Hedgehop(x, coleen) -> Autistic(coleen))\nforall x (Lateral(x) and Company(x, bellamy) -> Hedgehop(x, coleen))\nforall x (Hedgehop(x, bellamy) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Company(x, coleen) -> Lateral(x))\nforall x (Hedgehop(x, coleen) and Hedgehop(x, bellamy) -> Lateral(bellamy))\nforall x (Company(x, coleen) -> Reprove(coleen, bellamy))\nforall x (Fungible(x) and Reprove(x, bellamy) -> Company(x, bellamy))\n\nHedgehop(coleen, coleen)\n\nLateral(coleen) and Company(coleen, bellamy) and forall x (Lateral(x) and Company(x, bellamy) -> Hedgehop(x, coleen)) -> therefore Hedgehop(coleen, coleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The yelena bereave the bartel. The yelena is alpha. The yelena is ampullary. The yelena is waiting. The yelena swamp the bartel. The yelena master the bartel. The bartel bereave the yelena. If someone is waiting then they like the bartel. If someone master the yelena then the yelena is configured. If someone is waiting and they like the bartel then they see the yelena. If someone master the bartel then they are ampullary. If someone swamp the yelena then they are waiting. If someone master the yelena and they see the bartel then the bartel is waiting. If someone swamp the yelena then the yelena bereave the bartel. If someone is wired and they eat the bartel then they like the bartel. The yelena does not see the yelena.", "logic": "\nBereave(yelena, bartel)\nAlpha(yelena)\nAmpullary(yelena)\nWaiting(yelena)\nSwamp(yelena, bartel)\nMaster(yelena, bartel)\nBereave(bartel, yelena)\nforall x (Waiting(x) -> Swamp(x, bartel))\nforall x (Master(x, yelena) -> Configured(yelena))\nforall x (Waiting(x) and Swamp(x, bartel) -> Master(x, yelena))\nforall x (Master(x, bartel) -> Ampullary(x))\nforall x (Swamp(x, yelena) -> Waiting(x))\nforall x (Master(x, yelena) and Master(x, bartel) -> Waiting(bartel))\nforall x (Swamp(x, yelena) -> Bereave(yelena, bartel))\nforall x (Wired(x) and Bereave(x, bartel) -> Swamp(x, bartel))\n\nnot Master(yelena, yelena)\n\nWaiting(yelena) and Swamp(yelena, bartel) and forall x (Waiting(x) and Swamp(x, bartel) -> Master(x, yelena)) -> therefore Master(yelena, yelena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The venkat unroll the winifield. The venkat is prussian. The venkat is salving. The venkat is feudal. The venkat outdraw the winifield. The venkat champ the winifield. The winifield unroll the venkat. If someone is feudal then they like the winifield. If someone champ the venkat then the venkat is alert. If someone is feudal and they like the winifield then they see the venkat. If someone champ the winifield then they are salving. If someone outdraw the venkat then they are feudal. If someone champ the venkat and they see the winifield then the winifield is feudal. If someone outdraw the venkat then the venkat unroll the winifield. If someone is anapestic and they eat the winifield then they like the winifield. The venkat is alert.", "logic": "\nUnroll(venkat, winifield)\nPrussian(venkat)\nSalving(venkat)\nFeudal(venkat)\nOutdraw(venkat, winifield)\nChamp(venkat, winifield)\nUnroll(winifield, venkat)\nforall x (Feudal(x) -> Outdraw(x, winifield))\nforall x (Champ(x, venkat) -> Alert(venkat))\nforall x (Feudal(x) and Outdraw(x, winifield) -> Champ(x, venkat))\nforall x (Champ(x, winifield) -> Salving(x))\nforall x (Outdraw(x, venkat) -> Feudal(x))\nforall x (Champ(x, venkat) and Champ(x, winifield) -> Feudal(winifield))\nforall x (Outdraw(x, venkat) -> Unroll(venkat, winifield))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) and Unroll(x, winifield) -> Outdraw(x, winifield))\n\nAlert(venkat)\n\nFeudal(venkat) and Outdraw(venkat, winifield) and forall x (Feudal(x) and Outdraw(x, winifield) -> Champ(x, venkat)) -> therefore Champ(venkat, venkat) Champ(venkat, venkat) and forall x (Champ(x, venkat) -> Alert(venkat)) -> therefore Alert(venkat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The yanaton desiccate the merrili. The yanaton is sophistic. The yanaton is musky. The yanaton is defendable. The yanaton stumble the merrili. The yanaton revolve the merrili. The merrili desiccate the yanaton. If someone is defendable then they like the merrili. If someone revolve the yanaton then the yanaton is unadvised. If someone is defendable and they like the merrili then they see the yanaton. If someone revolve the merrili then they are musky. If someone stumble the yanaton then they are defendable. If someone revolve the yanaton and they see the merrili then the merrili is defendable. If someone stumble the yanaton then the yanaton desiccate the merrili. If someone is foul and they eat the merrili then they like the merrili. The yanaton is not unadvised.", "logic": "\nDesiccate(yanaton, merrili)\nSophistic(yanaton)\nMusky(yanaton)\nDefendable(yanaton)\nStumble(yanaton, merrili)\nRevolve(yanaton, merrili)\nDesiccate(merrili, yanaton)\nforall x (Defendable(x) -> Stumble(x, merrili))\nforall x (Revolve(x, yanaton) -> Unadvised(yanaton))\nforall x (Defendable(x) and Stumble(x, merrili) -> Revolve(x, yanaton))\nforall x (Revolve(x, merrili) -> Musky(x))\nforall x (Stumble(x, yanaton) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Revolve(x, yanaton) and Revolve(x, merrili) -> Defendable(merrili))\nforall x (Stumble(x, yanaton) -> Desiccate(yanaton, merrili))\nforall x (Foul(x) and Desiccate(x, merrili) -> Stumble(x, merrili))\n\nnot Unadvised(yanaton)\n\nDefendable(yanaton) and Stumble(yanaton, merrili) and forall x (Defendable(x) and Stumble(x, merrili) -> Revolve(x, yanaton)) -> therefore Revolve(yanaton, yanaton) Revolve(yanaton, yanaton) and forall x (Revolve(x, yanaton) -> Unadvised(yanaton)) -> therefore Unadvised(yanaton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The darda hedgehop the owen. The darda is apopemptic. The darda is promissory. The darda is dynamical. The darda scuff the owen. The darda confide the owen. The owen hedgehop the darda. If someone is dynamical then they like the owen. If someone confide the darda then the darda is gushy. If someone is dynamical and they like the owen then they see the darda. If someone confide the owen then they are promissory. If someone scuff the darda then they are dynamical. If someone confide the darda and they see the owen then the owen is dynamical. If someone scuff the darda then the darda hedgehop the owen. If someone is bacteremic and they eat the owen then they like the owen. The owen scuff the owen.", "logic": "\nHedgehop(darda, owen)\nApopemptic(darda)\nPromissory(darda)\nDynamical(darda)\nScuff(darda, owen)\nConfide(darda, owen)\nHedgehop(owen, darda)\nforall x (Dynamical(x) -> Scuff(x, owen))\nforall x (Confide(x, darda) -> Gushy(darda))\nforall x (Dynamical(x) and Scuff(x, owen) -> Confide(x, darda))\nforall x (Confide(x, owen) -> Promissory(x))\nforall x (Scuff(x, darda) -> Dynamical(x))\nforall x (Confide(x, darda) and Confide(x, owen) -> Dynamical(owen))\nforall x (Scuff(x, darda) -> Hedgehop(darda, owen))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) and Hedgehop(x, owen) -> Scuff(x, owen))\n\nScuff(owen, owen)\n\nDynamical(darda) and Scuff(darda, owen) and forall x (Dynamical(x) and Scuff(x, owen) -> Confide(x, darda)) -> therefore Confide(darda, darda) Confide(darda, darda) and Confide(darda, owen) and forall x (Confide(x, darda) and Confide(x, owen) -> Dynamical(owen)) -> therefore Dynamical(owen) Dynamical(owen) and forall x (Dynamical(x) -> Scuff(x, owen)) -> therefore Scuff(owen, owen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The thomasin scorn the marcos. The thomasin is comestible. The thomasin is gripping. The thomasin is shoddy. The thomasin ensconce the marcos. The thomasin urticate the marcos. The marcos scorn the thomasin. If someone is shoddy then they like the marcos. If someone urticate the thomasin then the thomasin is pending. If someone is shoddy and they like the marcos then they see the thomasin. If someone urticate the marcos then they are gripping. If someone ensconce the thomasin then they are shoddy. If someone urticate the thomasin and they see the marcos then the marcos is shoddy. If someone ensconce the thomasin then the thomasin scorn the marcos. If someone is nonplussed and they eat the marcos then they like the marcos. The marcos does not like the marcos.", "logic": "\nScorn(thomasin, marcos)\nComestible(thomasin)\nGripping(thomasin)\nShoddy(thomasin)\nEnsconce(thomasin, marcos)\nUrticate(thomasin, marcos)\nScorn(marcos, thomasin)\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> Ensconce(x, marcos))\nforall x (Urticate(x, thomasin) -> Pending(thomasin))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) and Ensconce(x, marcos) -> Urticate(x, thomasin))\nforall x (Urticate(x, marcos) -> Gripping(x))\nforall x (Ensconce(x, thomasin) -> Shoddy(x))\nforall x (Urticate(x, thomasin) and Urticate(x, marcos) -> Shoddy(marcos))\nforall x (Ensconce(x, thomasin) -> Scorn(thomasin, marcos))\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) and Scorn(x, marcos) -> Ensconce(x, marcos))\n\nnot Ensconce(marcos, marcos)\n\nShoddy(thomasin) and Ensconce(thomasin, marcos) and forall x (Shoddy(x) and Ensconce(x, marcos) -> Urticate(x, thomasin)) -> therefore Urticate(thomasin, thomasin) Urticate(thomasin, thomasin) and Urticate(thomasin, marcos) and forall x (Urticate(x, thomasin) and Urticate(x, marcos) -> Shoddy(marcos)) -> therefore Shoddy(marcos) Shoddy(marcos) and forall x (Shoddy(x) -> Ensconce(x, marcos)) -> therefore Ensconce(marcos, marcos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The malanie homologise the cornelle. The malanie is pectineal. The malanie is beadlike. The malanie is awash. The malanie singe the cornelle. The malanie tussle the cornelle. The cornelle homologise the malanie. If someone is awash then they like the cornelle. If someone tussle the malanie then the malanie is passerine. If someone is awash and they like the cornelle then they see the malanie. If someone tussle the cornelle then they are beadlike. If someone singe the malanie then they are awash. If someone tussle the malanie and they see the cornelle then the cornelle is awash. If someone singe the malanie then the malanie homologise the cornelle. If someone is achromatic and they eat the cornelle then they like the cornelle. The cornelle is not beadlike.", "logic": "\nHomologise(malanie, cornelle)\nPectineal(malanie)\nBeadlike(malanie)\nAwash(malanie)\nSinge(malanie, cornelle)\nTussle(malanie, cornelle)\nHomologise(cornelle, malanie)\nforall x (Awash(x) -> Singe(x, cornelle))\nforall x (Tussle(x, malanie) -> Passerine(malanie))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Singe(x, cornelle) -> Tussle(x, malanie))\nforall x (Tussle(x, cornelle) -> Beadlike(x))\nforall x (Singe(x, malanie) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Tussle(x, malanie) and Tussle(x, cornelle) -> Awash(cornelle))\nforall x (Singe(x, malanie) -> Homologise(malanie, cornelle))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) and Homologise(x, cornelle) -> Singe(x, cornelle))\n\nnot Beadlike(cornelle)\n\nforall x (Tussle(x, cornelle) -> Beadlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The norris pack the artie. The norris is dreamed. The norris is westerly. The norris is sinning. The norris grimace the artie. The norris tribulate the artie. The artie pack the norris. If someone is sinning then they like the artie. If someone tribulate the norris then the norris is heliacal. If someone is sinning and they like the artie then they see the norris. If someone tribulate the artie then they are westerly. If someone grimace the norris then they are sinning. If someone tribulate the norris and they see the artie then the artie is sinning. If someone grimace the norris then the norris pack the artie. If someone is specious and they eat the artie then they like the artie. The artie is heliacal.", "logic": "\nPack(norris, artie)\nDreamed(norris)\nWesterly(norris)\nSinning(norris)\nGrimace(norris, artie)\nTribulate(norris, artie)\nPack(artie, norris)\nforall x (Sinning(x) -> Grimace(x, artie))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, norris) -> Heliacal(norris))\nforall x (Sinning(x) and Grimace(x, artie) -> Tribulate(x, norris))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, artie) -> Westerly(x))\nforall x (Grimace(x, norris) -> Sinning(x))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, norris) and Tribulate(x, artie) -> Sinning(artie))\nforall x (Grimace(x, norris) -> Pack(norris, artie))\nforall x (Specious(x) and Pack(x, artie) -> Grimace(x, artie))\n\nHeliacal(artie)\n\nHeliacal(artie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The sivert consent the nicki. The sivert is groping. The sivert is facetious. The sivert is calm. The sivert overweary the nicki. The sivert solder the nicki. The nicki consent the sivert. If someone is calm then they like the nicki. If someone solder the sivert then the sivert is didactical. If someone is calm and they like the nicki then they see the sivert. If someone solder the nicki then they are facetious. If someone overweary the sivert then they are calm. If someone solder the sivert and they see the nicki then the nicki is calm. If someone overweary the sivert then the sivert consent the nicki. If someone is thinkable and they eat the nicki then they like the nicki. The nicki does not like the sivert.", "logic": "\nConsent(sivert, nicki)\nGroping(sivert)\nFacetious(sivert)\nCalm(sivert)\nOverweary(sivert, nicki)\nSolder(sivert, nicki)\nConsent(nicki, sivert)\nforall x (Calm(x) -> Overweary(x, nicki))\nforall x (Solder(x, sivert) -> Didactical(sivert))\nforall x (Calm(x) and Overweary(x, nicki) -> Solder(x, sivert))\nforall x (Solder(x, nicki) -> Facetious(x))\nforall x (Overweary(x, sivert) -> Calm(x))\nforall x (Solder(x, sivert) and Solder(x, nicki) -> Calm(nicki))\nforall x (Overweary(x, sivert) -> Consent(sivert, nicki))\nforall x (Thinkable(x) and Consent(x, nicki) -> Overweary(x, nicki))\n\nnot Overweary(nicki, sivert)\n\nnot Overweary(nicki, sivert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The abbi creosote the lorraine. The abbi is unliveried. The abbi is undramatic. The abbi is nonracist. The abbi immolate the lorraine. The abbi equal the lorraine. The lorraine creosote the abbi. If someone is nonracist then they like the lorraine. If someone equal the abbi then the abbi is labeled. If someone is nonracist and they like the lorraine then they see the abbi. If someone equal the lorraine then they are undramatic. If someone immolate the abbi then they are nonracist. If someone equal the abbi and they see the lorraine then the lorraine is nonracist. If someone immolate the abbi then the abbi creosote the lorraine. If someone is nigerian and they eat the lorraine then they like the lorraine. The lorraine is unliveried.", "logic": "\nCreosote(abbi, lorraine)\nUnliveried(abbi)\nUndramatic(abbi)\nNonracist(abbi)\nImmolate(abbi, lorraine)\nEqual(abbi, lorraine)\nCreosote(lorraine, abbi)\nforall x (Nonracist(x) -> Immolate(x, lorraine))\nforall x (Equal(x, abbi) -> Labeled(abbi))\nforall x (Nonracist(x) and Immolate(x, lorraine) -> Equal(x, abbi))\nforall x (Equal(x, lorraine) -> Undramatic(x))\nforall x (Immolate(x, abbi) -> Nonracist(x))\nforall x (Equal(x, abbi) and Equal(x, lorraine) -> Nonracist(lorraine))\nforall x (Immolate(x, abbi) -> Creosote(abbi, lorraine))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) and Creosote(x, lorraine) -> Immolate(x, lorraine))\n\nUnliveried(lorraine)\n\nUnliveried(lorraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The nina refracture the arielle. The nina is robust. The nina is lurid. The nina is consoling. The nina hark the arielle. The nina capitalize the arielle. The arielle refracture the nina. If someone is consoling then they like the arielle. If someone capitalize the nina then the nina is colicky. If someone is consoling and they like the arielle then they see the nina. If someone capitalize the arielle then they are lurid. If someone hark the nina then they are consoling. If someone capitalize the nina and they see the arielle then the arielle is consoling. If someone hark the nina then the nina refracture the arielle. If someone is opencut and they eat the arielle then they like the arielle. The nina is not opencut.", "logic": "\nRefracture(nina, arielle)\nRobust(nina)\nLurid(nina)\nConsoling(nina)\nHark(nina, arielle)\nCapitalize(nina, arielle)\nRefracture(arielle, nina)\nforall x (Consoling(x) -> Hark(x, arielle))\nforall x (Capitalize(x, nina) -> Colicky(nina))\nforall x (Consoling(x) and Hark(x, arielle) -> Capitalize(x, nina))\nforall x (Capitalize(x, arielle) -> Lurid(x))\nforall x (Hark(x, nina) -> Consoling(x))\nforall x (Capitalize(x, nina) and Capitalize(x, arielle) -> Consoling(arielle))\nforall x (Hark(x, nina) -> Refracture(nina, arielle))\nforall x (Opencut(x) and Refracture(x, arielle) -> Hark(x, arielle))\n\nnot Opencut(nina)\n\nnot Opencut(nina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The annetta jinx the lelia. The annetta is bespoke. The annetta is incurable. The annetta is witching. The annetta mate the lelia. The annetta brattle the lelia. The lelia jinx the annetta. If someone is witching then they like the lelia. If someone brattle the annetta then the annetta is overshot. If someone is witching and they like the lelia then they see the annetta. If someone brattle the lelia then they are incurable. If someone mate the annetta then they are witching. If someone brattle the annetta and they see the lelia then the lelia is witching. If someone mate the annetta then the annetta jinx the lelia. If someone is passerine and they eat the lelia then they like the lelia. The lelia brattle the lelia.", "logic": "\nJinx(annetta, lelia)\nBespoke(annetta)\nIncurable(annetta)\nWitching(annetta)\nMate(annetta, lelia)\nBrattle(annetta, lelia)\nJinx(lelia, annetta)\nforall x (Witching(x) -> Mate(x, lelia))\nforall x (Brattle(x, annetta) -> Overshot(annetta))\nforall x (Witching(x) and Mate(x, lelia) -> Brattle(x, annetta))\nforall x (Brattle(x, lelia) -> Incurable(x))\nforall x (Mate(x, annetta) -> Witching(x))\nforall x (Brattle(x, annetta) and Brattle(x, lelia) -> Witching(lelia))\nforall x (Mate(x, annetta) -> Jinx(annetta, lelia))\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Jinx(x, lelia) -> Mate(x, lelia))\n\nBrattle(lelia, lelia)\n\nBrattle(lelia, lelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The mozelle name the anabelle. The mozelle is barky. The mozelle is meritable. The mozelle is piffling. The mozelle digitise the anabelle. The mozelle jostle the anabelle. The anabelle name the mozelle. If someone is piffling then they like the anabelle. If someone jostle the mozelle then the mozelle is slack. If someone is piffling and they like the anabelle then they see the mozelle. If someone jostle the anabelle then they are meritable. If someone digitise the mozelle then they are piffling. If someone jostle the mozelle and they see the anabelle then the anabelle is piffling. If someone digitise the mozelle then the mozelle name the anabelle. If someone is profuse and they eat the anabelle then they like the anabelle. The anabelle is not profuse.", "logic": "\nName(mozelle, anabelle)\nBarky(mozelle)\nMeritable(mozelle)\nPiffling(mozelle)\nDigitise(mozelle, anabelle)\nJostle(mozelle, anabelle)\nName(anabelle, mozelle)\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> Digitise(x, anabelle))\nforall x (Jostle(x, mozelle) -> Slack(mozelle))\nforall x (Piffling(x) and Digitise(x, anabelle) -> Jostle(x, mozelle))\nforall x (Jostle(x, anabelle) -> Meritable(x))\nforall x (Digitise(x, mozelle) -> Piffling(x))\nforall x (Jostle(x, mozelle) and Jostle(x, anabelle) -> Piffling(anabelle))\nforall x (Digitise(x, mozelle) -> Name(mozelle, anabelle))\nforall x (Profuse(x) and Name(x, anabelle) -> Digitise(x, anabelle))\n\nnot Profuse(anabelle)\n\nnot Profuse(anabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The marjory anodise the liz. The marjory is crushing. The marjory is sacral. The marjory is widowed. The marjory prerecord the liz. The marjory cover the liz. The liz anodise the marjory. If someone is widowed then they like the liz. If someone cover the marjory then the marjory is impending. If someone is widowed and they like the liz then they see the marjory. If someone cover the liz then they are sacral. If someone prerecord the marjory then they are widowed. If someone cover the marjory and they see the liz then the liz is widowed. If someone prerecord the marjory then the marjory anodise the liz. If someone is utile and they eat the liz then they like the liz. The liz anodise the liz.", "logic": "\nAnodise(marjory, liz)\nCrushing(marjory)\nSacral(marjory)\nWidowed(marjory)\nPrerecord(marjory, liz)\nCover(marjory, liz)\nAnodise(liz, marjory)\nforall x (Widowed(x) -> Prerecord(x, liz))\nforall x (Cover(x, marjory) -> Impending(marjory))\nforall x (Widowed(x) and Prerecord(x, liz) -> Cover(x, marjory))\nforall x (Cover(x, liz) -> Sacral(x))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, marjory) -> Widowed(x))\nforall x (Cover(x, marjory) and Cover(x, liz) -> Widowed(liz))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, marjory) -> Anodise(marjory, liz))\nforall x (Utile(x) and Anodise(x, liz) -> Prerecord(x, liz))\n\nAnodise(liz, liz)\n\nAnodise(liz, liz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "Hogan is pyrolytic. Joann is spacial. Thorpe is spacial. Green people are digital. If Thorpe is verminous and Thorpe is gaussian then Thorpe is sudden. If Hogan is centenary then Hogan is sudden. Red people are pyrolytic. If Thorpe is verminous then Thorpe is spacial. All digital people are sudden. All pyrolytic, verminous people are digital. If someone is verminous and pyrolytic then they are centenary. Hogan is pyrolytic.", "logic": "\nPyrolytic(hogan)\nSpacial(joann)\nSpacial(thorpe)\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Digital(x))\nVerminous(thorpe) and Gaussian(thorpe) -> Sudden(thorpe)\nCentenary(hogan) -> Sudden(hogan)\nforall x (Spacial(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\nVerminous(thorpe) -> Spacial(thorpe)\nforall x (Digital(x) -> Sudden(x))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) and Verminous(x) -> Digital(x))\nforall x (Verminous(x) and Pyrolytic(x) -> Centenary(x))\n\nPyrolytic(hogan)\n\ntherefore Pyrolytic(hogan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Hal is struggling. Wilmer is jiggered. Nestor is jiggered. Green people are bespoke. If Nestor is azimuthal and Nestor is upwind then Nestor is bumbling. If Hal is separable then Hal is bumbling. Red people are struggling. If Nestor is azimuthal then Nestor is jiggered. All bespoke people are bumbling. All struggling, azimuthal people are bespoke. If someone is azimuthal and struggling then they are separable. Hal is not struggling.", "logic": "\nStruggling(hal)\nJiggered(wilmer)\nJiggered(nestor)\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nAzimuthal(nestor) and Upwind(nestor) -> Bumbling(nestor)\nSeparable(hal) -> Bumbling(hal)\nforall x (Jiggered(x) -> Struggling(x))\nAzimuthal(nestor) -> Jiggered(nestor)\nforall x (Bespoke(x) -> Bumbling(x))\nforall x (Struggling(x) and Azimuthal(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and Struggling(x) -> Separable(x))\n\nnot Struggling(hal)\n\ntherefore Struggling(hal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Freddi is lank. Rolf is satyric. Rutledge is satyric. Green people are entozoan. If Rutledge is mechanised and Rutledge is pulverized then Rutledge is nestled. If Freddi is blae then Freddi is nestled. Red people are lank. If Rutledge is mechanised then Rutledge is satyric. All entozoan people are nestled. All lank, mechanised people are entozoan. If someone is mechanised and lank then they are blae. Rutledge is lank.", "logic": "\nLank(freddi)\nSatyric(rolf)\nSatyric(rutledge)\nforall x (Lank(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nMechanised(rutledge) and Pulverized(rutledge) -> Nestled(rutledge)\nBlae(freddi) -> Nestled(freddi)\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Lank(x))\nMechanised(rutledge) -> Satyric(rutledge)\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Nestled(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) and Mechanised(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and Lank(x) -> Blae(x))\n\nLank(rutledge)\n\nSatyric(rutledge) and forall x (Satyric(x) -> Lank(x)) -> therefore Lank(rutledge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Marylou is barefoot. Norina is ubiquitous. Maxi is ubiquitous. Green people are elegiac. If Maxi is bipartizan and Maxi is paid then Maxi is compulsive. If Marylou is wearing then Marylou is compulsive. Red people are barefoot. If Maxi is bipartizan then Maxi is ubiquitous. All elegiac people are compulsive. All barefoot, bipartizan people are elegiac. If someone is bipartizan and barefoot then they are wearing. Marylou is not elegiac.", "logic": "\nBarefoot(marylou)\nUbiquitous(norina)\nUbiquitous(maxi)\nforall x (Barefoot(x) -> Elegiac(x))\nBipartizan(maxi) and Paid(maxi) -> Compulsive(maxi)\nWearing(marylou) -> Compulsive(marylou)\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> Barefoot(x))\nBipartizan(maxi) -> Ubiquitous(maxi)\nforall x (Elegiac(x) -> Compulsive(x))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Bipartizan(x) -> Elegiac(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) and Barefoot(x) -> Wearing(x))\n\nnot Elegiac(marylou)\n\nBarefoot(marylou) and forall x (Barefoot(x) -> Elegiac(x)) -> therefore Elegiac(marylou)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Lib is skanky. Mercy is juridic. Ortensia is juridic. Green people are prostyle. If Ortensia is dented and Ortensia is ammino then Ortensia is audenesque. If Lib is tenderised then Lib is audenesque. Red people are skanky. If Ortensia is dented then Ortensia is juridic. All prostyle people are audenesque. All skanky, dented people are prostyle. If someone is dented and skanky then they are tenderised. Lib is audenesque.", "logic": "\nSkanky(lib)\nJuridic(mercy)\nJuridic(ortensia)\nforall x (Skanky(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nDented(ortensia) and Ammino(ortensia) -> Audenesque(ortensia)\nTenderised(lib) -> Audenesque(lib)\nforall x (Juridic(x) -> Skanky(x))\nDented(ortensia) -> Juridic(ortensia)\nforall x (Prostyle(x) -> Audenesque(x))\nforall x (Skanky(x) and Dented(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) and Skanky(x) -> Tenderised(x))\n\nAudenesque(lib)\n\nSkanky(lib) and forall x (Skanky(x) -> Prostyle(x)) -> therefore Prostyle(lib) Prostyle(lib) and forall x (Prostyle(x) -> Audenesque(x)) -> therefore Audenesque(lib)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Tami is pessimal. Crystal is leggy. Dodi is leggy. Green people are transient. If Dodi is coreferent and Dodi is serious then Dodi is operculate. If Tami is temptable then Tami is operculate. Red people are pessimal. If Dodi is coreferent then Dodi is leggy. All transient people are operculate. All pessimal, coreferent people are transient. If someone is coreferent and pessimal then they are temptable. Dodi is not transient.", "logic": "\nPessimal(tami)\nLeggy(crystal)\nLeggy(dodi)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> Transient(x))\nCoreferent(dodi) and Serious(dodi) -> Operculate(dodi)\nTemptable(tami) -> Operculate(tami)\nforall x (Leggy(x) -> Pessimal(x))\nCoreferent(dodi) -> Leggy(dodi)\nforall x (Transient(x) -> Operculate(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Coreferent(x) -> Transient(x))\nforall x (Coreferent(x) and Pessimal(x) -> Temptable(x))\n\nnot Transient(dodi)\n\nLeggy(dodi) and forall x (Leggy(x) -> Pessimal(x)) -> therefore Pessimal(dodi) Pessimal(dodi) and forall x (Pessimal(x) -> Transient(x)) -> therefore Transient(dodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Zita is gemmed. Gratia is allogeneic. Carmelle is allogeneic. Green people are kokka. If Carmelle is uneasy and Carmelle is unswerving then Carmelle is clathrate. If Zita is splitting then Zita is clathrate. Red people are gemmed. If Carmelle is uneasy then Carmelle is allogeneic. All kokka people are clathrate. All gemmed, uneasy people are kokka. If someone is uneasy and gemmed then they are splitting. Carmelle is clathrate.", "logic": "\nGemmed(zita)\nAllogeneic(gratia)\nAllogeneic(carmelle)\nforall x (Gemmed(x) -> Kokka(x))\nUneasy(carmelle) and Unswerving(carmelle) -> Clathrate(carmelle)\nSplitting(zita) -> Clathrate(zita)\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Gemmed(x))\nUneasy(carmelle) -> Allogeneic(carmelle)\nforall x (Kokka(x) -> Clathrate(x))\nforall x (Gemmed(x) and Uneasy(x) -> Kokka(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) and Gemmed(x) -> Splitting(x))\n\nClathrate(carmelle)\n\nAllogeneic(carmelle) and forall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Gemmed(x)) -> therefore Gemmed(carmelle) Gemmed(carmelle) and forall x (Gemmed(x) -> Kokka(x)) -> therefore Kokka(carmelle) Kokka(carmelle) and forall x (Kokka(x) -> Clathrate(x)) -> therefore Clathrate(carmelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Sig is phagocytic. Sergei is genotypic. Osbourne is genotypic. Green people are tepid. If Osbourne is germy and Osbourne is isotonic then Osbourne is paradisaic. If Sig is teary then Sig is paradisaic. Red people are phagocytic. If Osbourne is germy then Osbourne is genotypic. All tepid people are paradisaic. All phagocytic, germy people are tepid. If someone is germy and phagocytic then they are teary. Osbourne is not paradisaic.", "logic": "\nPhagocytic(sig)\nGenotypic(sergei)\nGenotypic(osbourne)\nforall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Tepid(x))\nGermy(osbourne) and Isotonic(osbourne) -> Paradisaic(osbourne)\nTeary(sig) -> Paradisaic(sig)\nforall x (Genotypic(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nGermy(osbourne) -> Genotypic(osbourne)\nforall x (Tepid(x) -> Paradisaic(x))\nforall x (Phagocytic(x) and Germy(x) -> Tepid(x))\nforall x (Germy(x) and Phagocytic(x) -> Teary(x))\n\nnot Paradisaic(osbourne)\n\nGenotypic(osbourne) and forall x (Genotypic(x) -> Phagocytic(x)) -> therefore Phagocytic(osbourne) Phagocytic(osbourne) and forall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Tepid(x)) -> therefore Tepid(osbourne) Tepid(osbourne) and forall x (Tepid(x) -> Paradisaic(x)) -> therefore Paradisaic(osbourne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Desdemona is artless. Annetta is heavenward. Adria is heavenward. Green people are upcoming. If Adria is bawdy and Adria is timorous then Adria is scabby. If Desdemona is eastward then Desdemona is scabby. Red people are artless. If Adria is bawdy then Adria is heavenward. All upcoming people are scabby. All artless, bawdy people are upcoming. If someone is bawdy and artless then they are eastward. Annetta is not eastward.", "logic": "\nArtless(desdemona)\nHeavenward(annetta)\nHeavenward(adria)\nforall x (Artless(x) -> Upcoming(x))\nBawdy(adria) and Timorous(adria) -> Scabby(adria)\nEastward(desdemona) -> Scabby(desdemona)\nforall x (Heavenward(x) -> Artless(x))\nBawdy(adria) -> Heavenward(adria)\nforall x (Upcoming(x) -> Scabby(x))\nforall x (Artless(x) and Bawdy(x) -> Upcoming(x))\nforall x (Bawdy(x) and Artless(x) -> Eastward(x))\n\nnot Eastward(annetta)\n\nforall x (Bawdy(x) and Artless(x) -> Eastward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Meredith is castled. Sherrie is unrigged. Anders is unrigged. Green people are burred. If Anders is tubed and Anders is nonimmune then Anders is dissolute. If Meredith is gammy then Meredith is dissolute. Red people are castled. If Anders is tubed then Anders is unrigged. All burred people are dissolute. All castled, tubed people are burred. If someone is tubed and castled then they are gammy. Meredith is gammy.", "logic": "\nCastled(meredith)\nUnrigged(sherrie)\nUnrigged(anders)\nforall x (Castled(x) -> Burred(x))\nTubed(anders) and Nonimmune(anders) -> Dissolute(anders)\nGammy(meredith) -> Dissolute(meredith)\nforall x (Unrigged(x) -> Castled(x))\nTubed(anders) -> Unrigged(anders)\nforall x (Burred(x) -> Dissolute(x))\nforall x (Castled(x) and Tubed(x) -> Burred(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) and Castled(x) -> Gammy(x))\n\nGammy(meredith)\n\nforall x (Tubed(x) and Castled(x) -> Gammy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Adolf is halt. Vijay is downhill. Tate is downhill. Green people are centroidal. If Tate is malign and Tate is afloat then Tate is primeval. If Adolf is ischaemic then Adolf is primeval. Red people are halt. If Tate is malign then Tate is downhill. All centroidal people are primeval. All halt, malign people are centroidal. If someone is malign and halt then they are ischaemic. Tate is not ischaemic.", "logic": "\nHalt(adolf)\nDownhill(vijay)\nDownhill(tate)\nforall x (Halt(x) -> Centroidal(x))\nMalign(tate) and Afloat(tate) -> Primeval(tate)\nIschaemic(adolf) -> Primeval(adolf)\nforall x (Downhill(x) -> Halt(x))\nMalign(tate) -> Downhill(tate)\nforall x (Centroidal(x) -> Primeval(x))\nforall x (Halt(x) and Malign(x) -> Centroidal(x))\nforall x (Malign(x) and Halt(x) -> Ischaemic(x))\n\nnot Ischaemic(tate)\n\nforall x (Malign(x) and Halt(x) -> Ischaemic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Elwyn is hebrew. Lancelot is impersonal. Karissa is impersonal. Green people are comfy. If Karissa is plucky and Karissa is climatical then Karissa is peripheral. If Elwyn is columbian then Elwyn is peripheral. Red people are hebrew. If Karissa is plucky then Karissa is impersonal. All comfy people are peripheral. All hebrew, plucky people are comfy. If someone is plucky and hebrew then they are columbian. Karissa is plucky.", "logic": "\nHebrew(elwyn)\nImpersonal(lancelot)\nImpersonal(karissa)\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Comfy(x))\nPlucky(karissa) and Climatical(karissa) -> Peripheral(karissa)\nColumbian(elwyn) -> Peripheral(elwyn)\nforall x (Impersonal(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nPlucky(karissa) -> Impersonal(karissa)\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nforall x (Hebrew(x) and Plucky(x) -> Comfy(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Columbian(x))\n\nPlucky(karissa)\n\nPlucky(karissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Mel is unitarian. Dulci is nary. Nelia is nary. Green people are unsighted. If Nelia is soled and Nelia is irenic then Nelia is apposable. If Mel is indigo then Mel is apposable. Red people are unitarian. If Nelia is soled then Nelia is nary. All unsighted people are apposable. All unitarian, soled people are unsighted. If someone is soled and unitarian then they are indigo. Dulci is not soled.", "logic": "\nUnitarian(mel)\nNary(dulci)\nNary(nelia)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Unsighted(x))\nSoled(nelia) and Irenic(nelia) -> Apposable(nelia)\nIndigo(mel) -> Apposable(mel)\nforall x (Nary(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nSoled(nelia) -> Nary(nelia)\nforall x (Unsighted(x) -> Apposable(x))\nforall x (Unitarian(x) and Soled(x) -> Unsighted(x))\nforall x (Soled(x) and Unitarian(x) -> Indigo(x))\n\nnot Soled(dulci)\n\nnot Soled(dulci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Godfry is fossilised. Ashley is oncoming. Kristien is oncoming. Green people are exegetic. If Kristien is unsated and Kristien is resettled then Kristien is vapourised. If Godfry is thyrotoxic then Godfry is vapourised. Red people are fossilised. If Kristien is unsated then Kristien is oncoming. All exegetic people are vapourised. All fossilised, unsated people are exegetic. If someone is unsated and fossilised then they are thyrotoxic. Godfry is resettled.", "logic": "\nFossilised(godfry)\nOncoming(ashley)\nOncoming(kristien)\nforall x (Fossilised(x) -> Exegetic(x))\nUnsated(kristien) and Resettled(kristien) -> Vapourised(kristien)\nThyrotoxic(godfry) -> Vapourised(godfry)\nforall x (Oncoming(x) -> Fossilised(x))\nUnsated(kristien) -> Oncoming(kristien)\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Fossilised(x) and Unsated(x) -> Exegetic(x))\nforall x (Unsated(x) and Fossilised(x) -> Thyrotoxic(x))\n\nResettled(godfry)\n\nResettled(godfry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Mohammad is meshugga. Torr is stigmatic. Gabrielle is stigmatic. Green people are ravishing. If Gabrielle is joking and Gabrielle is gooselike then Gabrielle is subsurface. If Mohammad is throated then Mohammad is subsurface. Red people are meshugga. If Gabrielle is joking then Gabrielle is stigmatic. All ravishing people are subsurface. All meshugga, joking people are ravishing. If someone is joking and meshugga then they are throated. Gabrielle is not gooselike.", "logic": "\nMeshugga(mohammad)\nStigmatic(torr)\nStigmatic(gabrielle)\nforall x (Meshugga(x) -> Ravishing(x))\nJoking(gabrielle) and Gooselike(gabrielle) -> Subsurface(gabrielle)\nThroated(mohammad) -> Subsurface(mohammad)\nforall x (Stigmatic(x) -> Meshugga(x))\nJoking(gabrielle) -> Stigmatic(gabrielle)\nforall x (Ravishing(x) -> Subsurface(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Joking(x) -> Ravishing(x))\nforall x (Joking(x) and Meshugga(x) -> Throated(x))\n\nnot Gooselike(gabrielle)\n\nnot Gooselike(gabrielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Douglis is agitated. Vallie is seeing. Eliott is seeing. Green people are miscible. If Eliott is admittible and Eliott is gratuitous then Eliott is culinary. If Douglis is persian then Douglis is culinary. Red people are agitated. If Eliott is admittible then Eliott is seeing. All miscible people are culinary. All agitated, admittible people are miscible. If someone is admittible and agitated then they are persian. Vallie is gratuitous.", "logic": "\nAgitated(douglis)\nSeeing(vallie)\nSeeing(eliott)\nforall x (Agitated(x) -> Miscible(x))\nAdmittible(eliott) and Gratuitous(eliott) -> Culinary(eliott)\nPersian(douglis) -> Culinary(douglis)\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Agitated(x))\nAdmittible(eliott) -> Seeing(eliott)\nforall x (Miscible(x) -> Culinary(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) and Admittible(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) and Agitated(x) -> Persian(x))\n\nGratuitous(vallie)\n\nGratuitous(vallie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "The sharleen is wealthy. The sharleen is not grieving. The sharleen is fatuous. The sharleen endear the travers. The leanor does not visit the travers. The travers does not chase the leanor. The valery does not chase the sharleen. If someone silver the leanor then they like the valery. If someone is wealthy then they like the travers. If the travers is corymbose and the travers is wealthy then the travers is alary. If the valery is not corymbose then the valery teethe the travers. If someone is alary and wealthy then they do not visit the travers. If the sharleen silver the travers then the sharleen silver the leanor. The sharleen is fatuous.", "logic": "\nWealthy(sharleen)\nnot Grieving(sharleen)\nFatuous(sharleen)\nEndear(sharleen, travers)\nnot Endear(leanor, travers)\nnot Teethe(travers, leanor)\nnot Teethe(valery, sharleen)\nforall x (Silver(x, leanor) -> Silver(x, valery))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) -> Silver(x, travers))\nCorymbose(travers) and Wealthy(travers) -> Alary(travers)\nnot Corymbose(valery) -> Teethe(valery, travers)\nforall x (Alary(x) and Wealthy(x) -> not Endear(x, travers))\nSilver(sharleen, travers) -> Silver(sharleen, leanor)\n\nFatuous(sharleen)\n\ntherefore Fatuous(sharleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The dwayne is ungallant. The dwayne is not privileged. The dwayne is instinct. The dwayne fowl the corry. The carree does not visit the corry. The corry does not chase the carree. The griffith does not chase the dwayne. If someone gate the carree then they like the griffith. If someone is ungallant then they like the corry. If the corry is analgetic and the corry is ungallant then the corry is vertebrate. If the griffith is not analgetic then the griffith rely the corry. If someone is vertebrate and ungallant then they do not visit the corry. If the dwayne gate the corry then the dwayne gate the carree. The dwayne is privileged.", "logic": "\nUngallant(dwayne)\nnot Privileged(dwayne)\nInstinct(dwayne)\nFowl(dwayne, corry)\nnot Fowl(carree, corry)\nnot Rely(corry, carree)\nnot Rely(griffith, dwayne)\nforall x (Gate(x, carree) -> Gate(x, griffith))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) -> Gate(x, corry))\nAnalgetic(corry) and Ungallant(corry) -> Vertebrate(corry)\nnot Analgetic(griffith) -> Rely(griffith, corry)\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) and Ungallant(x) -> not Fowl(x, corry))\nGate(dwayne, corry) -> Gate(dwayne, carree)\n\nPrivileged(dwayne)\n\ntherefore not Privileged(dwayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The melantha is federate. The melantha is not adagio. The melantha is pregnant. The melantha email the joleen. The bryant does not visit the joleen. The joleen does not chase the bryant. The olenka does not chase the melantha. If someone forward the bryant then they like the olenka. If someone is federate then they like the joleen. If the joleen is unbounded and the joleen is federate then the joleen is unpassable. If the olenka is not unbounded then the olenka swob the joleen. If someone is unpassable and federate then they do not visit the joleen. If the melantha forward the joleen then the melantha forward the bryant. The melantha forward the joleen.", "logic": "\nFederate(melantha)\nnot Adagio(melantha)\nPregnant(melantha)\nEmail(melantha, joleen)\nnot Email(bryant, joleen)\nnot Swob(joleen, bryant)\nnot Swob(olenka, melantha)\nforall x (Forward(x, bryant) -> Forward(x, olenka))\nforall x (Federate(x) -> Forward(x, joleen))\nUnbounded(joleen) and Federate(joleen) -> Unpassable(joleen)\nnot Unbounded(olenka) -> Swob(olenka, joleen)\nforall x (Unpassable(x) and Federate(x) -> not Email(x, joleen))\nForward(melantha, joleen) -> Forward(melantha, bryant)\n\nForward(melantha, joleen)\n\nFederate(melantha) and forall x (Federate(x) -> Forward(x, joleen)) -> therefore Forward(melantha, joleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The abbie is unsullied. The abbie is not fancy. The abbie is stochastic. The abbie skydive the jeanine. The rob does not visit the jeanine. The jeanine does not chase the rob. The merilee does not chase the abbie. If someone pearl the rob then they like the merilee. If someone is unsullied then they like the jeanine. If the jeanine is littler and the jeanine is unsullied then the jeanine is cypriote. If the merilee is not littler then the merilee swinge the jeanine. If someone is cypriote and unsullied then they do not visit the jeanine. If the abbie pearl the jeanine then the abbie pearl the rob. The abbie does not like the jeanine.", "logic": "\nUnsullied(abbie)\nnot Fancy(abbie)\nStochastic(abbie)\nSkydive(abbie, jeanine)\nnot Skydive(rob, jeanine)\nnot Swinge(jeanine, rob)\nnot Swinge(merilee, abbie)\nforall x (Pearl(x, rob) -> Pearl(x, merilee))\nforall x (Unsullied(x) -> Pearl(x, jeanine))\nLittler(jeanine) and Unsullied(jeanine) -> Cypriote(jeanine)\nnot Littler(merilee) -> Swinge(merilee, jeanine)\nforall x (Cypriote(x) and Unsullied(x) -> not Skydive(x, jeanine))\nPearl(abbie, jeanine) -> Pearl(abbie, rob)\n\nnot Pearl(abbie, jeanine)\n\nUnsullied(abbie) and forall x (Unsullied(x) -> Pearl(x, jeanine)) -> therefore Pearl(abbie, jeanine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The chrystal is autoecious. The chrystal is not forfeit. The chrystal is indie. The chrystal navigate the katrinka. The pyotr does not visit the katrinka. The katrinka does not chase the pyotr. The sande does not chase the chrystal. If someone fuss the pyotr then they like the sande. If someone is autoecious then they like the katrinka. If the katrinka is inglorious and the katrinka is autoecious then the katrinka is excretory. If the sande is not inglorious then the sande unbuckle the katrinka. If someone is excretory and autoecious then they do not visit the katrinka. If the chrystal fuss the katrinka then the chrystal fuss the pyotr. The chrystal fuss the pyotr.", "logic": "\nAutoecious(chrystal)\nnot Forfeit(chrystal)\nIndie(chrystal)\nNavigate(chrystal, katrinka)\nnot Navigate(pyotr, katrinka)\nnot Unbuckle(katrinka, pyotr)\nnot Unbuckle(sande, chrystal)\nforall x (Fuss(x, pyotr) -> Fuss(x, sande))\nforall x (Autoecious(x) -> Fuss(x, katrinka))\nInglorious(katrinka) and Autoecious(katrinka) -> Excretory(katrinka)\nnot Inglorious(sande) -> Unbuckle(sande, katrinka)\nforall x (Excretory(x) and Autoecious(x) -> not Navigate(x, katrinka))\nFuss(chrystal, katrinka) -> Fuss(chrystal, pyotr)\n\nFuss(chrystal, pyotr)\n\nAutoecious(chrystal) and forall x (Autoecious(x) -> Fuss(x, katrinka)) -> therefore Fuss(chrystal, katrinka) Fuss(chrystal, katrinka) and Fuss(chrystal, katrinka) -> Fuss(chrystal, pyotr) -> therefore Fuss(chrystal, pyotr)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The kaila is untoothed. The kaila is not kookie. The kaila is fouled. The kaila charm the nick. The xerxes does not visit the nick. The nick does not chase the xerxes. The therese does not chase the kaila. If someone forebode the xerxes then they like the therese. If someone is untoothed then they like the nick. If the nick is utilised and the nick is untoothed then the nick is wilful. If the therese is not utilised then the therese blot the nick. If someone is wilful and untoothed then they do not visit the nick. If the kaila forebode the nick then the kaila forebode the xerxes. The kaila does not like the xerxes.", "logic": "\nUntoothed(kaila)\nnot Kookie(kaila)\nFouled(kaila)\nCharm(kaila, nick)\nnot Charm(xerxes, nick)\nnot Blot(nick, xerxes)\nnot Blot(therese, kaila)\nforall x (Forebode(x, xerxes) -> Forebode(x, therese))\nforall x (Untoothed(x) -> Forebode(x, nick))\nUtilised(nick) and Untoothed(nick) -> Wilful(nick)\nnot Utilised(therese) -> Blot(therese, nick)\nforall x (Wilful(x) and Untoothed(x) -> not Charm(x, nick))\nForebode(kaila, nick) -> Forebode(kaila, xerxes)\n\nnot Forebode(kaila, xerxes)\n\nUntoothed(kaila) and forall x (Untoothed(x) -> Forebode(x, nick)) -> therefore Forebode(kaila, nick) Forebode(kaila, nick) and Forebode(kaila, nick) -> Forebode(kaila, xerxes) -> therefore Forebode(kaila, xerxes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The ezra is simple. The ezra is not operant. The ezra is uncarved. The ezra velcro the evita. The hannis does not visit the evita. The evita does not chase the hannis. The marnie does not chase the ezra. If someone preoccupy the hannis then they like the marnie. If someone is simple then they like the evita. If the evita is bizonal and the evita is simple then the evita is spread. If the marnie is not bizonal then the marnie nasalize the evita. If someone is spread and simple then they do not visit the evita. If the ezra preoccupy the evita then the ezra preoccupy the hannis. The ezra preoccupy the marnie.", "logic": "\nSimple(ezra)\nnot Operant(ezra)\nUncarved(ezra)\nVelcro(ezra, evita)\nnot Velcro(hannis, evita)\nnot Nasalize(evita, hannis)\nnot Nasalize(marnie, ezra)\nforall x (Preoccupy(x, hannis) -> Preoccupy(x, marnie))\nforall x (Simple(x) -> Preoccupy(x, evita))\nBizonal(evita) and Simple(evita) -> Spread(evita)\nnot Bizonal(marnie) -> Nasalize(marnie, evita)\nforall x (Spread(x) and Simple(x) -> not Velcro(x, evita))\nPreoccupy(ezra, evita) -> Preoccupy(ezra, hannis)\n\nPreoccupy(ezra, marnie)\n\nSimple(ezra) and forall x (Simple(x) -> Preoccupy(x, evita)) -> therefore Preoccupy(ezra, evita) Preoccupy(ezra, evita) and Preoccupy(ezra, evita) -> Preoccupy(ezra, hannis) -> therefore Preoccupy(ezra, hannis) Preoccupy(ezra, hannis) and forall x (Preoccupy(x, hannis) -> Preoccupy(x, marnie)) -> therefore Preoccupy(ezra, marnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The carrol is aecial. The carrol is not parvenu. The carrol is snooty. The carrol black the jacenta. The constancy does not visit the jacenta. The jacenta does not chase the constancy. The lelia does not chase the carrol. If someone invest the constancy then they like the lelia. If someone is aecial then they like the jacenta. If the jacenta is ravening and the jacenta is aecial then the jacenta is arced. If the lelia is not ravening then the lelia revive the jacenta. If someone is arced and aecial then they do not visit the jacenta. If the carrol invest the jacenta then the carrol invest the constancy. The carrol does not like the lelia.", "logic": "\nAecial(carrol)\nnot Parvenu(carrol)\nSnooty(carrol)\nBlack(carrol, jacenta)\nnot Black(constancy, jacenta)\nnot Revive(jacenta, constancy)\nnot Revive(lelia, carrol)\nforall x (Invest(x, constancy) -> Invest(x, lelia))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Invest(x, jacenta))\nRavening(jacenta) and Aecial(jacenta) -> Arced(jacenta)\nnot Ravening(lelia) -> Revive(lelia, jacenta)\nforall x (Arced(x) and Aecial(x) -> not Black(x, jacenta))\nInvest(carrol, jacenta) -> Invest(carrol, constancy)\n\nnot Invest(carrol, lelia)\n\nAecial(carrol) and forall x (Aecial(x) -> Invest(x, jacenta)) -> therefore Invest(carrol, jacenta) Invest(carrol, jacenta) and Invest(carrol, jacenta) -> Invest(carrol, constancy) -> therefore Invest(carrol, constancy) Invest(carrol, constancy) and forall x (Invest(x, constancy) -> Invest(x, lelia)) -> therefore Invest(carrol, lelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The berte is arthurian. The berte is not spinose. The berte is expandable. The berte link the yardley. The boyce does not visit the yardley. The yardley does not chase the boyce. The corby does not chase the berte. If someone goad the boyce then they like the corby. If someone is arthurian then they like the yardley. If the yardley is loverly and the yardley is arthurian then the yardley is confident. If the corby is not loverly then the corby debrief the yardley. If someone is confident and arthurian then they do not visit the yardley. If the berte goad the yardley then the berte goad the boyce. The boyce does not like the yardley.", "logic": "\nArthurian(berte)\nnot Spinose(berte)\nExpandable(berte)\nLink(berte, yardley)\nnot Link(boyce, yardley)\nnot Debrief(yardley, boyce)\nnot Debrief(corby, berte)\nforall x (Goad(x, boyce) -> Goad(x, corby))\nforall x (Arthurian(x) -> Goad(x, yardley))\nLoverly(yardley) and Arthurian(yardley) -> Confident(yardley)\nnot Loverly(corby) -> Debrief(corby, yardley)\nforall x (Confident(x) and Arthurian(x) -> not Link(x, yardley))\nGoad(berte, yardley) -> Goad(berte, boyce)\n\nnot Goad(boyce, yardley)\n\nforall x (Arthurian(x) -> Goad(x, yardley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The donn is unsociable. The donn is not mandean. The donn is zapotec. The donn flicker the hamid. The reynolds does not visit the hamid. The hamid does not chase the reynolds. The theodora does not chase the donn. If someone etherify the reynolds then they like the theodora. If someone is unsociable then they like the hamid. If the hamid is estimable and the hamid is unsociable then the hamid is solicitous. If the theodora is not estimable then the theodora sledge the hamid. If someone is solicitous and unsociable then they do not visit the hamid. If the donn etherify the hamid then the donn etherify the reynolds. The hamid etherify the hamid.", "logic": "\nUnsociable(donn)\nnot Mandean(donn)\nZapotec(donn)\nFlicker(donn, hamid)\nnot Flicker(reynolds, hamid)\nnot Sledge(hamid, reynolds)\nnot Sledge(theodora, donn)\nforall x (Etherify(x, reynolds) -> Etherify(x, theodora))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) -> Etherify(x, hamid))\nEstimable(hamid) and Unsociable(hamid) -> Solicitous(hamid)\nnot Estimable(theodora) -> Sledge(theodora, hamid)\nforall x (Solicitous(x) and Unsociable(x) -> not Flicker(x, hamid))\nEtherify(donn, hamid) -> Etherify(donn, reynolds)\n\nEtherify(hamid, hamid)\n\nforall x (Unsociable(x) -> Etherify(x, hamid)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The sabra is syphilitic. The sabra is not frigorific. The sabra is tragical. The sabra perpetuate the walter. The travers does not visit the walter. The walter does not chase the travers. The worden does not chase the sabra. If someone expatriate the travers then they like the worden. If someone is syphilitic then they like the walter. If the walter is semantic and the walter is syphilitic then the walter is weaponless. If the worden is not semantic then the worden flavour the walter. If someone is weaponless and syphilitic then they do not visit the walter. If the sabra expatriate the walter then the sabra expatriate the travers. The walter is not weaponless.", "logic": "\nSyphilitic(sabra)\nnot Frigorific(sabra)\nTragical(sabra)\nPerpetuate(sabra, walter)\nnot Perpetuate(travers, walter)\nnot Flavour(walter, travers)\nnot Flavour(worden, sabra)\nforall x (Expatriate(x, travers) -> Expatriate(x, worden))\nforall x (Syphilitic(x) -> Expatriate(x, walter))\nSemantic(walter) and Syphilitic(walter) -> Weaponless(walter)\nnot Semantic(worden) -> Flavour(worden, walter)\nforall x (Weaponless(x) and Syphilitic(x) -> not Perpetuate(x, walter))\nExpatriate(sabra, walter) -> Expatriate(sabra, travers)\n\nnot Weaponless(walter)\n\nSemantic(walter) and Syphilitic(walter) -> Weaponless(walter) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The caroljean is consensual. The caroljean is not glassed. The caroljean is shapely. The caroljean requite the radcliffe. The zechariah does not visit the radcliffe. The radcliffe does not chase the zechariah. The susanna does not chase the caroljean. If someone convict the zechariah then they like the susanna. If someone is consensual then they like the radcliffe. If the radcliffe is supportive and the radcliffe is consensual then the radcliffe is acquainted. If the susanna is not supportive then the susanna surmount the radcliffe. If someone is acquainted and consensual then they do not visit the radcliffe. If the caroljean convict the radcliffe then the caroljean convict the zechariah. The radcliffe convict the susanna.", "logic": "\nConsensual(caroljean)\nnot Glassed(caroljean)\nShapely(caroljean)\nRequite(caroljean, radcliffe)\nnot Requite(zechariah, radcliffe)\nnot Surmount(radcliffe, zechariah)\nnot Surmount(susanna, caroljean)\nforall x (Convict(x, zechariah) -> Convict(x, susanna))\nforall x (Consensual(x) -> Convict(x, radcliffe))\nSupportive(radcliffe) and Consensual(radcliffe) -> Acquainted(radcliffe)\nnot Supportive(susanna) -> Surmount(susanna, radcliffe)\nforall x (Acquainted(x) and Consensual(x) -> not Requite(x, radcliffe))\nConvict(caroljean, radcliffe) -> Convict(caroljean, zechariah)\n\nConvict(radcliffe, susanna)\n\nforall x (Convict(x, zechariah) -> Convict(x, susanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The merle is biserrate. The merle is not newfound. The merle is cannibalic. The merle pander the margret. The fonzie does not visit the margret. The margret does not chase the fonzie. The maisie does not chase the merle. If someone prizefight the fonzie then they like the maisie. If someone is biserrate then they like the margret. If the margret is most and the margret is biserrate then the margret is fond. If the maisie is not most then the maisie neaten the margret. If someone is fond and biserrate then they do not visit the margret. If the merle prizefight the margret then the merle prizefight the fonzie. The merle does not visit the fonzie.", "logic": "\nBiserrate(merle)\nnot Newfound(merle)\nCannibalic(merle)\nPander(merle, margret)\nnot Pander(fonzie, margret)\nnot Neaten(margret, fonzie)\nnot Neaten(maisie, merle)\nforall x (Prizefight(x, fonzie) -> Prizefight(x, maisie))\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> Prizefight(x, margret))\nMost(margret) and Biserrate(margret) -> Fond(margret)\nnot Most(maisie) -> Neaten(maisie, margret)\nforall x (Fond(x) and Biserrate(x) -> not Pander(x, margret))\nPrizefight(merle, margret) -> Prizefight(merle, fonzie)\n\nnot Pander(merle, fonzie)\n\nnot Pander(merle, fonzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The rozamond is malapropos. The rozamond is not unforceful. The rozamond is light. The rozamond cheapen the ronen. The darsie does not visit the ronen. The ronen does not chase the darsie. The tiphany does not chase the rozamond. If someone host the darsie then they like the tiphany. If someone is malapropos then they like the ronen. If the ronen is hydrous and the ronen is malapropos then the ronen is resolved. If the tiphany is not hydrous then the tiphany cooper the ronen. If someone is resolved and malapropos then they do not visit the ronen. If the rozamond host the ronen then the rozamond host the darsie. The ronen host the rozamond.", "logic": "\nMalapropos(rozamond)\nnot Unforceful(rozamond)\nLight(rozamond)\nCheapen(rozamond, ronen)\nnot Cheapen(darsie, ronen)\nnot Cooper(ronen, darsie)\nnot Cooper(tiphany, rozamond)\nforall x (Host(x, darsie) -> Host(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Malapropos(x) -> Host(x, ronen))\nHydrous(ronen) and Malapropos(ronen) -> Resolved(ronen)\nnot Hydrous(tiphany) -> Cooper(tiphany, ronen)\nforall x (Resolved(x) and Malapropos(x) -> not Cheapen(x, ronen))\nHost(rozamond, ronen) -> Host(rozamond, darsie)\n\nHost(ronen, rozamond)\n\nHost(ronen, rozamond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The clemmy is eldest. The clemmy is not libellous. The clemmy is bountied. The clemmy overcrowd the odele. The noreen does not visit the odele. The odele does not chase the noreen. The adolf does not chase the clemmy. If someone purloin the noreen then they like the adolf. If someone is eldest then they like the odele. If the odele is millennial and the odele is eldest then the odele is revelatory. If the adolf is not millennial then the adolf adopt the odele. If someone is revelatory and eldest then they do not visit the odele. If the clemmy purloin the odele then the clemmy purloin the noreen. The noreen does not chase the noreen.", "logic": "\nEldest(clemmy)\nnot Libellous(clemmy)\nBountied(clemmy)\nOvercrowd(clemmy, odele)\nnot Overcrowd(noreen, odele)\nnot Adopt(odele, noreen)\nnot Adopt(adolf, clemmy)\nforall x (Purloin(x, noreen) -> Purloin(x, adolf))\nforall x (Eldest(x) -> Purloin(x, odele))\nMillennial(odele) and Eldest(odele) -> Revelatory(odele)\nnot Millennial(adolf) -> Adopt(adolf, odele)\nforall x (Revelatory(x) and Eldest(x) -> not Overcrowd(x, odele))\nPurloin(clemmy, odele) -> Purloin(clemmy, noreen)\n\nnot Adopt(noreen, noreen)\n\nnot Adopt(noreen, noreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The allyson is perfumed. The allyson is not ferocious. The allyson is unpressed. The allyson terrace the ericka. The abigail does not visit the ericka. The ericka does not chase the abigail. The bernetta does not chase the allyson. If someone bejewel the abigail then they like the bernetta. If someone is perfumed then they like the ericka. If the ericka is sassy and the ericka is perfumed then the ericka is luxuriant. If the bernetta is not sassy then the bernetta dowse the ericka. If someone is luxuriant and perfumed then they do not visit the ericka. If the allyson bejewel the ericka then the allyson bejewel the abigail. The bernetta terrace the ericka.", "logic": "\nPerfumed(allyson)\nnot Ferocious(allyson)\nUnpressed(allyson)\nTerrace(allyson, ericka)\nnot Terrace(abigail, ericka)\nnot Dowse(ericka, abigail)\nnot Dowse(bernetta, allyson)\nforall x (Bejewel(x, abigail) -> Bejewel(x, bernetta))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Bejewel(x, ericka))\nSassy(ericka) and Perfumed(ericka) -> Luxuriant(ericka)\nnot Sassy(bernetta) -> Dowse(bernetta, ericka)\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) and Perfumed(x) -> not Terrace(x, ericka))\nBejewel(allyson, ericka) -> Bejewel(allyson, abigail)\n\nTerrace(bernetta, ericka)\n\nTerrace(bernetta, ericka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "Datha is inundated. Datha is chaste. Datha is donnish. Mose is soigne. Mose is chaste. Mose is donnish. Nesta is soigne. Nesta is inundated. Nesta is chaste. Nesta is heretical. Nesta is donnish. Harli is asquint. Harli is inundated. Harli is chaste. Harli is donnish. If someone is soigne and inundated then they are gone. If someone is gone then they are heretical. Green, chaste people are donnish. If someone is inundated and heretical then they are soigne. Rough people are asquint. If someone is asquint then they are inundated. Harli is donnish.", "logic": "\nInundated(datha)\nChaste(datha)\nDonnish(datha)\nSoigne(mose)\nChaste(mose)\nDonnish(mose)\nSoigne(nesta)\nInundated(nesta)\nChaste(nesta)\nHeretical(nesta)\nDonnish(nesta)\nAsquint(harli)\nInundated(harli)\nChaste(harli)\nDonnish(harli)\nforall x (Soigne(x) and Inundated(x) -> Gone(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Soigne(x) and Chaste(x) -> Donnish(x))\nforall x (Inundated(x) and Heretical(x) -> Soigne(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) -> Asquint(x))\nforall x (Asquint(x) -> Inundated(x))\n\nDonnish(harli)\n\ntherefore Donnish(harli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Andrei is smoky. Andrei is rigged. Andrei is riled. Tyler is dermal. Tyler is rigged. Tyler is riled. Rayshell is dermal. Rayshell is smoky. Rayshell is rigged. Rayshell is uncritical. Rayshell is riled. Pippy is unfeeling. Pippy is smoky. Pippy is rigged. Pippy is riled. If someone is dermal and smoky then they are bandaged. If someone is bandaged then they are uncritical. Green, rigged people are riled. If someone is smoky and uncritical then they are dermal. Rough people are unfeeling. If someone is unfeeling then they are smoky. Rayshell is not riled.", "logic": "\nSmoky(andrei)\nRigged(andrei)\nRiled(andrei)\nDermal(tyler)\nRigged(tyler)\nRiled(tyler)\nDermal(rayshell)\nSmoky(rayshell)\nRigged(rayshell)\nUncritical(rayshell)\nRiled(rayshell)\nUnfeeling(pippy)\nSmoky(pippy)\nRigged(pippy)\nRiled(pippy)\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Smoky(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Uncritical(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Rigged(x) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Smoky(x) and Uncritical(x) -> Dermal(x))\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) -> Smoky(x))\n\nnot Riled(rayshell)\n\ntherefore Riled(rayshell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Lonny is unreserved. Lonny is exergonic. Lonny is abstinent. Shir is afeared. Shir is exergonic. Shir is abstinent. Emlynn is afeared. Emlynn is unreserved. Emlynn is exergonic. Emlynn is harnessed. Emlynn is abstinent. Cherish is cankerous. Cherish is unreserved. Cherish is exergonic. Cherish is abstinent. If someone is afeared and unreserved then they are drooping. If someone is drooping then they are harnessed. Green, exergonic people are abstinent. If someone is unreserved and harnessed then they are afeared. Rough people are cankerous. If someone is cankerous then they are unreserved. Emlynn is cankerous.", "logic": "\nUnreserved(lonny)\nExergonic(lonny)\nAbstinent(lonny)\nAfeared(shir)\nExergonic(shir)\nAbstinent(shir)\nAfeared(emlynn)\nUnreserved(emlynn)\nExergonic(emlynn)\nHarnessed(emlynn)\nAbstinent(emlynn)\nCankerous(cherish)\nUnreserved(cherish)\nExergonic(cherish)\nAbstinent(cherish)\nforall x (Afeared(x) and Unreserved(x) -> Drooping(x))\nforall x (Drooping(x) -> Harnessed(x))\nforall x (Afeared(x) and Exergonic(x) -> Abstinent(x))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) and Harnessed(x) -> Afeared(x))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) -> Cankerous(x))\nforall x (Cankerous(x) -> Unreserved(x))\n\nCankerous(emlynn)\n\nExergonic(emlynn) and forall x (Exergonic(x) -> Cankerous(x)) -> therefore Cankerous(emlynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Cynthie is mesmeric. Cynthie is paying. Cynthie is auditory. Almeda is graduated. Almeda is paying. Almeda is auditory. Tharen is graduated. Tharen is mesmeric. Tharen is paying. Tharen is referent. Tharen is auditory. Lemmy is venerable. Lemmy is mesmeric. Lemmy is paying. Lemmy is auditory. If someone is graduated and mesmeric then they are signal. If someone is signal then they are referent. Green, paying people are auditory. If someone is mesmeric and referent then they are graduated. Rough people are venerable. If someone is venerable then they are mesmeric. Cynthie is not venerable.", "logic": "\nMesmeric(cynthie)\nPaying(cynthie)\nAuditory(cynthie)\nGraduated(almeda)\nPaying(almeda)\nAuditory(almeda)\nGraduated(tharen)\nMesmeric(tharen)\nPaying(tharen)\nReferent(tharen)\nAuditory(tharen)\nVenerable(lemmy)\nMesmeric(lemmy)\nPaying(lemmy)\nAuditory(lemmy)\nforall x (Graduated(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Signal(x))\nforall x (Signal(x) -> Referent(x))\nforall x (Graduated(x) and Paying(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) and Referent(x) -> Graduated(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Venerable(x))\nforall x (Venerable(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\n\nnot Venerable(cynthie)\n\nPaying(cynthie) and forall x (Paying(x) -> Venerable(x)) -> therefore Venerable(cynthie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Bethanne is enjoyable. Bethanne is superfine. Bethanne is fictitious. Domenico is commanding. Domenico is superfine. Domenico is fictitious. Aguinaldo is commanding. Aguinaldo is enjoyable. Aguinaldo is superfine. Aguinaldo is unexampled. Aguinaldo is fictitious. Dwaine is misused. Dwaine is enjoyable. Dwaine is superfine. Dwaine is fictitious. If someone is commanding and enjoyable then they are balmy. If someone is balmy then they are unexampled. Green, superfine people are fictitious. If someone is enjoyable and unexampled then they are commanding. Rough people are misused. If someone is misused then they are enjoyable. Domenico is enjoyable.", "logic": "\nEnjoyable(bethanne)\nSuperfine(bethanne)\nFictitious(bethanne)\nCommanding(domenico)\nSuperfine(domenico)\nFictitious(domenico)\nCommanding(aguinaldo)\nEnjoyable(aguinaldo)\nSuperfine(aguinaldo)\nUnexampled(aguinaldo)\nFictitious(aguinaldo)\nMisused(dwaine)\nEnjoyable(dwaine)\nSuperfine(dwaine)\nFictitious(dwaine)\nforall x (Commanding(x) and Enjoyable(x) -> Balmy(x))\nforall x (Balmy(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Commanding(x) and Superfine(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) and Unexampled(x) -> Commanding(x))\nforall x (Superfine(x) -> Misused(x))\nforall x (Misused(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\n\nEnjoyable(domenico)\n\nSuperfine(domenico) and forall x (Superfine(x) -> Misused(x)) -> therefore Misused(domenico) Misused(domenico) and forall x (Misused(x) -> Enjoyable(x)) -> therefore Enjoyable(domenico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Shellie is warming. Shellie is floaty. Shellie is frosted. Adelaide is gangling. Adelaide is floaty. Adelaide is frosted. Meier is gangling. Meier is warming. Meier is floaty. Meier is stubbly. Meier is frosted. Kingsley is bisulcate. Kingsley is warming. Kingsley is floaty. Kingsley is frosted. If someone is gangling and warming then they are dispersed. If someone is dispersed then they are stubbly. Green, floaty people are frosted. If someone is warming and stubbly then they are gangling. Rough people are bisulcate. If someone is bisulcate then they are warming. Adelaide is not warming.", "logic": "\nWarming(shellie)\nFloaty(shellie)\nFrosted(shellie)\nGangling(adelaide)\nFloaty(adelaide)\nFrosted(adelaide)\nGangling(meier)\nWarming(meier)\nFloaty(meier)\nStubbly(meier)\nFrosted(meier)\nBisulcate(kingsley)\nWarming(kingsley)\nFloaty(kingsley)\nFrosted(kingsley)\nforall x (Gangling(x) and Warming(x) -> Dispersed(x))\nforall x (Dispersed(x) -> Stubbly(x))\nforall x (Gangling(x) and Floaty(x) -> Frosted(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) and Stubbly(x) -> Gangling(x))\nforall x (Floaty(x) -> Bisulcate(x))\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) -> Warming(x))\n\nnot Warming(adelaide)\n\nFloaty(adelaide) and forall x (Floaty(x) -> Bisulcate(x)) -> therefore Bisulcate(adelaide) Bisulcate(adelaide) and forall x (Bisulcate(x) -> Warming(x)) -> therefore Warming(adelaide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Zollie is late. Zollie is autolytic. Zollie is estuarine. Forrest is scalar. Forrest is autolytic. Forrest is estuarine. Hendrika is scalar. Hendrika is late. Hendrika is autolytic. Hendrika is unaltered. Hendrika is estuarine. Ree is encysted. Ree is late. Ree is autolytic. Ree is estuarine. If someone is scalar and late then they are unclothed. If someone is unclothed then they are unaltered. Green, autolytic people are estuarine. If someone is late and unaltered then they are scalar. Rough people are encysted. If someone is encysted then they are late. Forrest is unclothed.", "logic": "\nLate(zollie)\nAutolytic(zollie)\nEstuarine(zollie)\nScalar(forrest)\nAutolytic(forrest)\nEstuarine(forrest)\nScalar(hendrika)\nLate(hendrika)\nAutolytic(hendrika)\nUnaltered(hendrika)\nEstuarine(hendrika)\nEncysted(ree)\nLate(ree)\nAutolytic(ree)\nEstuarine(ree)\nforall x (Scalar(x) and Late(x) -> Unclothed(x))\nforall x (Unclothed(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nforall x (Scalar(x) and Autolytic(x) -> Estuarine(x))\nforall x (Late(x) and Unaltered(x) -> Scalar(x))\nforall x (Autolytic(x) -> Encysted(x))\nforall x (Encysted(x) -> Late(x))\n\nUnclothed(forrest)\n\nAutolytic(forrest) and forall x (Autolytic(x) -> Encysted(x)) -> therefore Encysted(forrest) Encysted(forrest) and forall x (Encysted(x) -> Late(x)) -> therefore Late(forrest) Scalar(forrest) and Late(forrest) and forall x (Scalar(x) and Late(x) -> Unclothed(x)) -> therefore Unclothed(forrest)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Zebedee is bicornate. Zebedee is hybrid. Zebedee is northbound. Ricard is mental. Ricard is hybrid. Ricard is northbound. Marcile is mental. Marcile is bicornate. Marcile is hybrid. Marcile is hymenal. Marcile is northbound. Allie is dissected. Allie is bicornate. Allie is hybrid. Allie is northbound. If someone is mental and bicornate then they are small. If someone is small then they are hymenal. Green, hybrid people are northbound. If someone is bicornate and hymenal then they are mental. Rough people are dissected. If someone is dissected then they are bicornate. Ricard is not small.", "logic": "\nBicornate(zebedee)\nHybrid(zebedee)\nNorthbound(zebedee)\nMental(ricard)\nHybrid(ricard)\nNorthbound(ricard)\nMental(marcile)\nBicornate(marcile)\nHybrid(marcile)\nHymenal(marcile)\nNorthbound(marcile)\nDissected(allie)\nBicornate(allie)\nHybrid(allie)\nNorthbound(allie)\nforall x (Mental(x) and Bicornate(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Small(x) -> Hymenal(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) and Hybrid(x) -> Northbound(x))\nforall x (Bicornate(x) and Hymenal(x) -> Mental(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Dissected(x) -> Bicornate(x))\n\nnot Small(ricard)\n\nHybrid(ricard) and forall x (Hybrid(x) -> Dissected(x)) -> therefore Dissected(ricard) Dissected(ricard) and forall x (Dissected(x) -> Bicornate(x)) -> therefore Bicornate(ricard) Mental(ricard) and Bicornate(ricard) and forall x (Mental(x) and Bicornate(x) -> Small(x)) -> therefore Small(ricard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Hannah is watchful. Hannah is woozy. Hannah is avocado. Lindsey is equanimous. Lindsey is woozy. Lindsey is avocado. Andri is equanimous. Andri is watchful. Andri is woozy. Andri is avellan. Andri is avocado. Efram is specular. Efram is watchful. Efram is woozy. Efram is avocado. If someone is equanimous and watchful then they are romance. If someone is romance then they are avellan. Green, woozy people are avocado. If someone is watchful and avellan then they are equanimous. Rough people are specular. If someone is specular then they are watchful. Efram is not avellan.", "logic": "\nWatchful(hannah)\nWoozy(hannah)\nAvocado(hannah)\nEquanimous(lindsey)\nWoozy(lindsey)\nAvocado(lindsey)\nEquanimous(andri)\nWatchful(andri)\nWoozy(andri)\nAvellan(andri)\nAvocado(andri)\nSpecular(efram)\nWatchful(efram)\nWoozy(efram)\nAvocado(efram)\nforall x (Equanimous(x) and Watchful(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Equanimous(x) and Woozy(x) -> Avocado(x))\nforall x (Watchful(x) and Avellan(x) -> Equanimous(x))\nforall x (Woozy(x) -> Specular(x))\nforall x (Specular(x) -> Watchful(x))\n\nnot Avellan(efram)\n\nforall x (Romance(x) -> Avellan(x)) <- forall x (Equanimous(x) and Watchful(x) -> Romance(x)) <- forall x (Watchful(x) and Avellan(x) -> Equanimous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Sybila is singular. Sybila is clouded. Sybila is eminent. Gloriane is unmilitary. Gloriane is clouded. Gloriane is eminent. Lorelle is unmilitary. Lorelle is singular. Lorelle is clouded. Lorelle is blasted. Lorelle is eminent. Rube is summative. Rube is singular. Rube is clouded. Rube is eminent. If someone is unmilitary and singular then they are littoral. If someone is littoral then they are blasted. Green, clouded people are eminent. If someone is singular and blasted then they are unmilitary. Rough people are summative. If someone is summative then they are singular. Rube is unmilitary.", "logic": "\nSingular(sybila)\nClouded(sybila)\nEminent(sybila)\nUnmilitary(gloriane)\nClouded(gloriane)\nEminent(gloriane)\nUnmilitary(lorelle)\nSingular(lorelle)\nClouded(lorelle)\nBlasted(lorelle)\nEminent(lorelle)\nSummative(rube)\nSingular(rube)\nClouded(rube)\nEminent(rube)\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Singular(x) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Littoral(x) -> Blasted(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Clouded(x) -> Eminent(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) and Blasted(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Singular(x))\n\nUnmilitary(rube)\n\nforall x (Singular(x) and Blasted(x) -> Unmilitary(x)) <- forall x (Littoral(x) -> Blasted(x)) <- forall x (Unmilitary(x) and Singular(x) -> Littoral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Carmelle is odorous. Carmelle is sufferable. Carmelle is lonesome. Roxana is zealous. Roxana is sufferable. Roxana is lonesome. Halley is zealous. Halley is odorous. Halley is sufferable. Halley is chinchy. Halley is lonesome. Godard is prodromic. Godard is odorous. Godard is sufferable. Godard is lonesome. If someone is zealous and odorous then they are chalky. If someone is chalky then they are chinchy. Green, sufferable people are lonesome. If someone is odorous and chinchy then they are zealous. Rough people are prodromic. If someone is prodromic then they are odorous. Carmelle is not zealous.", "logic": "\nOdorous(carmelle)\nSufferable(carmelle)\nLonesome(carmelle)\nZealous(roxana)\nSufferable(roxana)\nLonesome(roxana)\nZealous(halley)\nOdorous(halley)\nSufferable(halley)\nChinchy(halley)\nLonesome(halley)\nProdromic(godard)\nOdorous(godard)\nSufferable(godard)\nLonesome(godard)\nforall x (Zealous(x) and Odorous(x) -> Chalky(x))\nforall x (Chalky(x) -> Chinchy(x))\nforall x (Zealous(x) and Sufferable(x) -> Lonesome(x))\nforall x (Odorous(x) and Chinchy(x) -> Zealous(x))\nforall x (Sufferable(x) -> Prodromic(x))\nforall x (Prodromic(x) -> Odorous(x))\n\nnot Zealous(carmelle)\n\nforall x (Odorous(x) and Chinchy(x) -> Zealous(x)) <- forall x (Chalky(x) -> Chinchy(x)) <- forall x (Zealous(x) and Odorous(x) -> Chalky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Binni is clashing. Binni is nilpotent. Binni is prankish. Scot is movable. Scot is nilpotent. Scot is prankish. Garnet is movable. Garnet is clashing. Garnet is nilpotent. Garnet is caespitose. Garnet is prankish. Kaitlyn is yellowed. Kaitlyn is clashing. Kaitlyn is nilpotent. Kaitlyn is prankish. If someone is movable and clashing then they are labeled. If someone is labeled then they are caespitose. Green, nilpotent people are prankish. If someone is clashing and caespitose then they are movable. Rough people are yellowed. If someone is yellowed then they are clashing. Binni is caespitose.", "logic": "\nClashing(binni)\nNilpotent(binni)\nPrankish(binni)\nMovable(scot)\nNilpotent(scot)\nPrankish(scot)\nMovable(garnet)\nClashing(garnet)\nNilpotent(garnet)\nCaespitose(garnet)\nPrankish(garnet)\nYellowed(kaitlyn)\nClashing(kaitlyn)\nNilpotent(kaitlyn)\nPrankish(kaitlyn)\nforall x (Movable(x) and Clashing(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Caespitose(x))\nforall x (Movable(x) and Nilpotent(x) -> Prankish(x))\nforall x (Clashing(x) and Caespitose(x) -> Movable(x))\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) -> Yellowed(x))\nforall x (Yellowed(x) -> Clashing(x))\n\nCaespitose(binni)\n\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Caespitose(x)) <- forall x (Movable(x) and Clashing(x) -> Labeled(x)) <- forall x (Clashing(x) and Caespitose(x) -> Movable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Eloise is divalent. Angelo is polyoicous. Jeremie is definite. Odille is fattish. All zapotec things are not divalent. Cold things are unblinking. If something is fattish and delighted then it is unblinking. If something is divalent and not delighted then it is not unblinking. White things are definite. Furry things are definite. Kind, fattish things are zapotec. If something is fattish and not delighted then it is not polyoicous. Eloise is divalent.", "logic": "\nDivalent(eloise)\nPolyoicous(angelo)\nDefinite(jeremie)\nFattish(odille)\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> not Divalent(x))\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Fattish(x) and Delighted(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Divalent(x) and not Delighted(x) -> not Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Delighted(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Fattish(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) and Fattish(x) -> Zapotec(x))\nforall x (Fattish(x) and not Delighted(x) -> not Polyoicous(x))\n\nDivalent(eloise)\n\ntherefore Divalent(eloise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Corey is meridional. Cordie is xxxii. Wolfie is activist. Eugen is encircled. All gambian things are not meridional. Cold things are cyprinid. If something is encircled and receding then it is cyprinid. If something is meridional and not receding then it is not cyprinid. White things are activist. Furry things are activist. Kind, encircled things are gambian. If something is encircled and not receding then it is not xxxii. Cordie is not xxxii.", "logic": "\nMeridional(corey)\nXxxii(cordie)\nActivist(wolfie)\nEncircled(eugen)\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> not Meridional(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) and Receding(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Meridional(x) and not Receding(x) -> not Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> Activist(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) -> Activist(x))\nforall x (Activist(x) and Encircled(x) -> Gambian(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) and not Receding(x) -> not Xxxii(x))\n\nnot Xxxii(cordie)\n\ntherefore Xxxii(cordie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Andres is calycinal. Frederico is clattery. Jeanelle is ashamed. Bertine is scratchy. All dismal things are not calycinal. Cold things are diverting. If something is scratchy and immediate then it is diverting. If something is calycinal and not immediate then it is not diverting. White things are ashamed. Furry things are ashamed. Kind, scratchy things are dismal. If something is scratchy and not immediate then it is not clattery. Bertine is ashamed.", "logic": "\nCalycinal(andres)\nClattery(frederico)\nAshamed(jeanelle)\nScratchy(bertine)\nforall x (Dismal(x) -> not Calycinal(x))\nforall x (Dismal(x) -> Diverting(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Immediate(x) -> Diverting(x))\nforall x (Calycinal(x) and not Immediate(x) -> not Diverting(x))\nforall x (Immediate(x) -> Ashamed(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) -> Ashamed(x))\nforall x (Ashamed(x) and Scratchy(x) -> Dismal(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and not Immediate(x) -> not Clattery(x))\n\nAshamed(bertine)\n\nScratchy(bertine) and forall x (Scratchy(x) -> Ashamed(x)) -> therefore Ashamed(bertine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Rayna is lipotropic. Halli is terminated. Milka is frolicky. Finley is overweight. All gasified things are not lipotropic. Cold things are pleural. If something is overweight and flagging then it is pleural. If something is lipotropic and not flagging then it is not pleural. White things are frolicky. Furry things are frolicky. Kind, overweight things are gasified. If something is overweight and not flagging then it is not terminated. Finley is not frolicky.", "logic": "\nLipotropic(rayna)\nTerminated(halli)\nFrolicky(milka)\nOverweight(finley)\nforall x (Gasified(x) -> not Lipotropic(x))\nforall x (Gasified(x) -> Pleural(x))\nforall x (Overweight(x) and Flagging(x) -> Pleural(x))\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) and not Flagging(x) -> not Pleural(x))\nforall x (Flagging(x) -> Frolicky(x))\nforall x (Overweight(x) -> Frolicky(x))\nforall x (Frolicky(x) and Overweight(x) -> Gasified(x))\nforall x (Overweight(x) and not Flagging(x) -> not Terminated(x))\n\nnot Frolicky(finley)\n\nOverweight(finley) and forall x (Overweight(x) -> Frolicky(x)) -> therefore Frolicky(finley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Laryssa is cackly. Markos is stern. Zary is esophageal. Ferne is vesicular. All veiled things are not cackly. Cold things are sabahan. If something is vesicular and ravaging then it is sabahan. If something is cackly and not ravaging then it is not sabahan. White things are esophageal. Furry things are esophageal. Kind, vesicular things are veiled. If something is vesicular and not ravaging then it is not stern. Ferne is veiled.", "logic": "\nCackly(laryssa)\nStern(markos)\nEsophageal(zary)\nVesicular(ferne)\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> not Cackly(x))\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Vesicular(x) and Ravaging(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Cackly(x) and not Ravaging(x) -> not Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Esophageal(x))\nforall x (Vesicular(x) -> Esophageal(x))\nforall x (Esophageal(x) and Vesicular(x) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Vesicular(x) and not Ravaging(x) -> not Stern(x))\n\nVeiled(ferne)\n\nVesicular(ferne) and forall x (Vesicular(x) -> Esophageal(x)) -> therefore Esophageal(ferne) Esophageal(ferne) and Vesicular(ferne) and forall x (Esophageal(x) and Vesicular(x) -> Veiled(x)) -> therefore Veiled(ferne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Rianon is agog. Adolpho is bragging. Rubina is laughing. Kevina is ephesian. All regular things are not agog. Cold things are umbilicate. If something is ephesian and unedited then it is umbilicate. If something is agog and not unedited then it is not umbilicate. White things are laughing. Furry things are laughing. Kind, ephesian things are regular. If something is ephesian and not unedited then it is not bragging. Kevina is not regular.", "logic": "\nAgog(rianon)\nBragging(adolpho)\nLaughing(rubina)\nEphesian(kevina)\nforall x (Regular(x) -> not Agog(x))\nforall x (Regular(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) and Unedited(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\nforall x (Agog(x) and not Unedited(x) -> not Umbilicate(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) -> Laughing(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) -> Laughing(x))\nforall x (Laughing(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Regular(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) and not Unedited(x) -> not Bragging(x))\n\nnot Regular(kevina)\n\nEphesian(kevina) and forall x (Ephesian(x) -> Laughing(x)) -> therefore Laughing(kevina) Laughing(kevina) and Ephesian(kevina) and forall x (Laughing(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Regular(x)) -> therefore Regular(kevina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Florinda is reasonless. Juditha is burnt. Tye is nuptial. Norman is untried. All explicit things are not reasonless. Cold things are endoscopic. If something is untried and grouchy then it is endoscopic. If something is reasonless and not grouchy then it is not endoscopic. White things are nuptial. Furry things are nuptial. Kind, untried things are explicit. If something is untried and not grouchy then it is not burnt. Norman is endoscopic.", "logic": "\nReasonless(florinda)\nBurnt(juditha)\nNuptial(tye)\nUntried(norman)\nforall x (Explicit(x) -> not Reasonless(x))\nforall x (Explicit(x) -> Endoscopic(x))\nforall x (Untried(x) and Grouchy(x) -> Endoscopic(x))\nforall x (Reasonless(x) and not Grouchy(x) -> not Endoscopic(x))\nforall x (Grouchy(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Untried(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) and Untried(x) -> Explicit(x))\nforall x (Untried(x) and not Grouchy(x) -> not Burnt(x))\n\nEndoscopic(norman)\n\nUntried(norman) and forall x (Untried(x) -> Nuptial(x)) -> therefore Nuptial(norman) Nuptial(norman) and Untried(norman) and forall x (Nuptial(x) and Untried(x) -> Explicit(x)) -> therefore Explicit(norman) Explicit(norman) and forall x (Explicit(x) -> Endoscopic(x)) -> therefore Endoscopic(norman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Mariska is flawless. Delphina is smothered. Thornton is univocal. Rosmunda is spoilable. All chambered things are not flawless. Cold things are thespian. If something is spoilable and acetylenic then it is thespian. If something is flawless and not acetylenic then it is not thespian. White things are univocal. Furry things are univocal. Kind, spoilable things are chambered. If something is spoilable and not acetylenic then it is not smothered. Rosmunda is not thespian.", "logic": "\nFlawless(mariska)\nSmothered(delphina)\nUnivocal(thornton)\nSpoilable(rosmunda)\nforall x (Chambered(x) -> not Flawless(x))\nforall x (Chambered(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) and Acetylenic(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (Flawless(x) and not Acetylenic(x) -> not Thespian(x))\nforall x (Acetylenic(x) -> Univocal(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Univocal(x))\nforall x (Univocal(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Chambered(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) and not Acetylenic(x) -> not Smothered(x))\n\nnot Thespian(rosmunda)\n\nSpoilable(rosmunda) and forall x (Spoilable(x) -> Univocal(x)) -> therefore Univocal(rosmunda) Univocal(rosmunda) and Spoilable(rosmunda) and forall x (Univocal(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Chambered(x)) -> therefore Chambered(rosmunda) Chambered(rosmunda) and forall x (Chambered(x) -> Thespian(x)) -> therefore Thespian(rosmunda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Phillipe is exogenic. Beitris is hepatic. Lanette is gravelly. Persis is tremulous. All temperate things are not exogenic. Cold things are boffo. If something is tremulous and landlocked then it is boffo. If something is exogenic and not landlocked then it is not boffo. White things are gravelly. Furry things are gravelly. Kind, tremulous things are temperate. If something is tremulous and not landlocked then it is not hepatic. Lanette is not boffo.", "logic": "\nExogenic(phillipe)\nHepatic(beitris)\nGravelly(lanette)\nTremulous(persis)\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> not Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and Landlocked(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and not Landlocked(x) -> not Boffo(x))\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) and Tremulous(x) -> Temperate(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and not Landlocked(x) -> not Hepatic(x))\n\nnot Boffo(lanette)\n\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Boffo(x)) <- forall x (Gravelly(x) and Tremulous(x) -> Temperate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Marlee is acquired. Felice is agitated. Shurlock is saudi. Vida is unhallowed. All retained things are not acquired. Cold things are enolic. If something is unhallowed and decided then it is enolic. If something is acquired and not decided then it is not enolic. White things are saudi. Furry things are saudi. Kind, unhallowed things are retained. If something is unhallowed and not decided then it is not agitated. Marlee is retained.", "logic": "\nAcquired(marlee)\nAgitated(felice)\nSaudi(shurlock)\nUnhallowed(vida)\nforall x (Retained(x) -> not Acquired(x))\nforall x (Retained(x) -> Enolic(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and Decided(x) -> Enolic(x))\nforall x (Acquired(x) and not Decided(x) -> not Enolic(x))\nforall x (Decided(x) -> Saudi(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) -> Saudi(x))\nforall x (Saudi(x) and Unhallowed(x) -> Retained(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and not Decided(x) -> not Agitated(x))\n\nRetained(marlee)\n\nforall x (Saudi(x) and Unhallowed(x) -> Retained(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Adriaens is ingrained. Fritz is sheeny. Cleva is feisty. Myles is high. All stated things are not ingrained. Cold things are zonary. If something is high and ugandan then it is zonary. If something is ingrained and not ugandan then it is not zonary. White things are feisty. Furry things are feisty. Kind, high things are stated. If something is high and not ugandan then it is not sheeny. Cleva is not stated.", "logic": "\nIngrained(adriaens)\nSheeny(fritz)\nFeisty(cleva)\nHigh(myles)\nforall x (Stated(x) -> not Ingrained(x))\nforall x (Stated(x) -> Zonary(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Ugandan(x) -> Zonary(x))\nforall x (Ingrained(x) and not Ugandan(x) -> not Zonary(x))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) -> Feisty(x))\nforall x (High(x) -> Feisty(x))\nforall x (Feisty(x) and High(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (High(x) and not Ugandan(x) -> not Sheeny(x))\n\nnot Stated(cleva)\n\nforall x (Feisty(x) and High(x) -> Stated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Ivan is xenophobic. Marley is carboxylic. Teriann is underslung. Josephina is donnean. All meshugge things are not xenophobic. Cold things are ubiquitous. If something is donnean and anomalous then it is ubiquitous. If something is xenophobic and not anomalous then it is not ubiquitous. White things are underslung. Furry things are underslung. Kind, donnean things are meshugge. If something is donnean and not anomalous then it is not carboxylic. Marley is ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nXenophobic(ivan)\nCarboxylic(marley)\nUnderslung(teriann)\nDonnean(josephina)\nforall x (Meshugge(x) -> not Xenophobic(x))\nforall x (Meshugge(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Donnean(x) and Anomalous(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and not Anomalous(x) -> not Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Anomalous(x) -> Underslung(x))\nforall x (Donnean(x) -> Underslung(x))\nforall x (Underslung(x) and Donnean(x) -> Meshugge(x))\nforall x (Donnean(x) and not Anomalous(x) -> not Carboxylic(x))\n\nUbiquitous(marley)\n\nforall x (Meshugge(x) -> Ubiquitous(x)) <- forall x (Underslung(x) and Donnean(x) -> Meshugge(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Alaine is uniovular. Lucie is ribless. Roby is sculptured. Shellie is permed. All shitless things are not uniovular. Cold things are azotic. If something is permed and trigonal then it is azotic. If something is uniovular and not trigonal then it is not azotic. White things are sculptured. Furry things are sculptured. Kind, permed things are shitless. If something is permed and not trigonal then it is not ribless. Alaine is not ribless.", "logic": "\nUniovular(alaine)\nRibless(lucie)\nSculptured(roby)\nPermed(shellie)\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> not Uniovular(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Azotic(x))\nforall x (Permed(x) and Trigonal(x) -> Azotic(x))\nforall x (Uniovular(x) and not Trigonal(x) -> not Azotic(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Permed(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) and Permed(x) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Permed(x) and not Trigonal(x) -> not Ribless(x))\n\nnot Ribless(alaine)\n\nnot Ribless(alaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Zoe is phylliform. Genvieve is redbrick. Leanor is processed. Francois is knobby. All rebellious things are not phylliform. Cold things are huddled. If something is knobby and delusional then it is huddled. If something is phylliform and not delusional then it is not huddled. White things are processed. Furry things are processed. Kind, knobby things are rebellious. If something is knobby and not delusional then it is not redbrick. Leanor is knobby.", "logic": "\nPhylliform(zoe)\nRedbrick(genvieve)\nProcessed(leanor)\nKnobby(francois)\nforall x (Rebellious(x) -> not Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Rebellious(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Knobby(x) and Delusional(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Phylliform(x) and not Delusional(x) -> not Huddled(x))\nforall x (Delusional(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Knobby(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) and Knobby(x) -> Rebellious(x))\nforall x (Knobby(x) and not Delusional(x) -> not Redbrick(x))\n\nKnobby(leanor)\n\nKnobby(leanor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Reginauld is alert. Anstice is inert. Odelinda is stannic. Erhart is chartered. All wandering things are not alert. Cold things are amorphous. If something is chartered and receding then it is amorphous. If something is alert and not receding then it is not amorphous. White things are stannic. Furry things are stannic. Kind, chartered things are wandering. If something is chartered and not receding then it is not inert. Erhart is not receding.", "logic": "\nAlert(reginauld)\nInert(anstice)\nStannic(odelinda)\nChartered(erhart)\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> not Alert(x))\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> Amorphous(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) and Receding(x) -> Amorphous(x))\nforall x (Alert(x) and not Receding(x) -> not Amorphous(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> Stannic(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Stannic(x))\nforall x (Stannic(x) and Chartered(x) -> Wandering(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) and not Receding(x) -> not Inert(x))\n\nnot Receding(erhart)\n\nnot Receding(erhart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Rosemaria is digestible. Gian is scurfy. Adele is partible. Bea is senile. All combustive things are not digestible. Cold things are extirpable. If something is senile and spiritless then it is extirpable. If something is digestible and not spiritless then it is not extirpable. White things are partible. Furry things are partible. Kind, senile things are combustive. If something is senile and not spiritless then it is not scurfy. Rosemaria is spiritless.", "logic": "\nDigestible(rosemaria)\nScurfy(gian)\nPartible(adele)\nSenile(bea)\nforall x (Combustive(x) -> not Digestible(x))\nforall x (Combustive(x) -> Extirpable(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) and Spiritless(x) -> Extirpable(x))\nforall x (Digestible(x) and not Spiritless(x) -> not Extirpable(x))\nforall x (Spiritless(x) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) and Senile(x) -> Combustive(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) and not Spiritless(x) -> not Scurfy(x))\n\nSpiritless(rosemaria)\n\nSpiritless(rosemaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Madeleine is barbaric. Standford is apnoeic. Phillis is scrivened. Berkley is barbaric. Cold, barbaric people are not acceptable. Green, scrivened people are acceptable. Round people are acceptable. If Standford is untellable and Standford is apnoeic then Standford is not barbaric. All barbaric people are scrivened. If someone is barbaric and scrivened then they are apnoeic. If someone is propitious and not starlit then they are not barbaric. If Standford is not barbaric then Standford is not acceptable. Berkley is barbaric.", "logic": "\nBarbaric(madeleine)\nApnoeic(standford)\nScrivened(phillis)\nBarbaric(berkley)\nforall x (Propitious(x) and Barbaric(x) -> not Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Starlit(x) and Scrivened(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nUntellable(standford) and Apnoeic(standford) -> not Barbaric(standford)\nforall x (Barbaric(x) -> Scrivened(x))\nforall x (Barbaric(x) and Scrivened(x) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) and not Starlit(x) -> not Barbaric(x))\nnot Barbaric(standford) -> not Acceptable(standford)\n\nBarbaric(berkley)\n\ntherefore Barbaric(berkley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Ashby is upbound. Katya is each. Ora is nebular. Dinnie is upbound. Cold, upbound people are not federal. Green, nebular people are federal. Round people are federal. If Katya is monetary and Katya is each then Katya is not upbound. All upbound people are nebular. If someone is upbound and nebular then they are each. If someone is multistory and not excusable then they are not upbound. If Katya is not upbound then Katya is not federal. Ora is not nebular.", "logic": "\nUpbound(ashby)\nEach(katya)\nNebular(ora)\nUpbound(dinnie)\nforall x (Multistory(x) and Upbound(x) -> not Federal(x))\nforall x (Excusable(x) and Nebular(x) -> Federal(x))\nforall x (Each(x) -> Federal(x))\nMonetary(katya) and Each(katya) -> not Upbound(katya)\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Nebular(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) and Nebular(x) -> Each(x))\nforall x (Multistory(x) and not Excusable(x) -> not Upbound(x))\nnot Upbound(katya) -> not Federal(katya)\n\nnot Nebular(ora)\n\ntherefore Nebular(ora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Brynna is biconvex. Shaylynn is limiting. George is mineral. Sarina is biconvex. Cold, biconvex people are not smothering. Green, mineral people are smothering. Round people are smothering. If Shaylynn is irritated and Shaylynn is limiting then Shaylynn is not biconvex. All biconvex people are mineral. If someone is biconvex and mineral then they are limiting. If someone is masonic and not leafed then they are not biconvex. If Shaylynn is not biconvex then Shaylynn is not smothering. Shaylynn is smothering.", "logic": "\nBiconvex(brynna)\nLimiting(shaylynn)\nMineral(george)\nBiconvex(sarina)\nforall x (Masonic(x) and Biconvex(x) -> not Smothering(x))\nforall x (Leafed(x) and Mineral(x) -> Smothering(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Smothering(x))\nIrritated(shaylynn) and Limiting(shaylynn) -> not Biconvex(shaylynn)\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Biconvex(x) and Mineral(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Masonic(x) and not Leafed(x) -> not Biconvex(x))\nnot Biconvex(shaylynn) -> not Smothering(shaylynn)\n\nSmothering(shaylynn)\n\nLimiting(shaylynn) and forall x (Limiting(x) -> Smothering(x)) -> therefore Smothering(shaylynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Chickie is tied. Cindee is totaled. Roshelle is clinquant. Carlyn is tied. Cold, tied people are not russet. Green, clinquant people are russet. Round people are russet. If Cindee is crowded and Cindee is totaled then Cindee is not tied. All tied people are clinquant. If someone is tied and clinquant then they are totaled. If someone is anosmic and not local then they are not tied. If Cindee is not tied then Cindee is not russet. Carlyn is not clinquant.", "logic": "\nTied(chickie)\nTotaled(cindee)\nClinquant(roshelle)\nTied(carlyn)\nforall x (Anosmic(x) and Tied(x) -> not Russet(x))\nforall x (Local(x) and Clinquant(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Russet(x))\nCrowded(cindee) and Totaled(cindee) -> not Tied(cindee)\nforall x (Tied(x) -> Clinquant(x))\nforall x (Tied(x) and Clinquant(x) -> Totaled(x))\nforall x (Anosmic(x) and not Local(x) -> not Tied(x))\nnot Tied(cindee) -> not Russet(cindee)\n\nnot Clinquant(carlyn)\n\nTied(carlyn) and forall x (Tied(x) -> Clinquant(x)) -> therefore Clinquant(carlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Smitty is seamanly. Joline is unready. Celina is sheeny. Dehlia is seamanly. Cold, seamanly people are not esteemed. Green, sheeny people are esteemed. Round people are esteemed. If Joline is addled and Joline is unready then Joline is not seamanly. All seamanly people are sheeny. If someone is seamanly and sheeny then they are unready. If someone is mongolian and not subaquatic then they are not seamanly. If Joline is not seamanly then Joline is not esteemed. Smitty is unready.", "logic": "\nSeamanly(smitty)\nUnready(joline)\nSheeny(celina)\nSeamanly(dehlia)\nforall x (Mongolian(x) and Seamanly(x) -> not Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) and Sheeny(x) -> Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Esteemed(x))\nAddled(joline) and Unready(joline) -> not Seamanly(joline)\nforall x (Seamanly(x) -> Sheeny(x))\nforall x (Seamanly(x) and Sheeny(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Mongolian(x) and not Subaquatic(x) -> not Seamanly(x))\nnot Seamanly(joline) -> not Esteemed(joline)\n\nUnready(smitty)\n\nSeamanly(smitty) and forall x (Seamanly(x) -> Sheeny(x)) -> therefore Sheeny(smitty) Seamanly(smitty) and Sheeny(smitty) and forall x (Seamanly(x) and Sheeny(x) -> Unready(x)) -> therefore Unready(smitty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Laurianne is polar. Gilburt is famous. Glennis is cuspate. Eloisa is polar. Cold, polar people are not wimpish. Green, cuspate people are wimpish. Round people are wimpish. If Gilburt is nonhairy and Gilburt is famous then Gilburt is not polar. All polar people are cuspate. If someone is polar and cuspate then they are famous. If someone is oldish and not mongoloid then they are not polar. If Gilburt is not polar then Gilburt is not wimpish. Laurianne is not famous.", "logic": "\nPolar(laurianne)\nFamous(gilburt)\nCuspate(glennis)\nPolar(eloisa)\nforall x (Oldish(x) and Polar(x) -> not Wimpish(x))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) and Cuspate(x) -> Wimpish(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Wimpish(x))\nNonhairy(gilburt) and Famous(gilburt) -> not Polar(gilburt)\nforall x (Polar(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Polar(x) and Cuspate(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) and not Mongoloid(x) -> not Polar(x))\nnot Polar(gilburt) -> not Wimpish(gilburt)\n\nnot Famous(laurianne)\n\nPolar(laurianne) and forall x (Polar(x) -> Cuspate(x)) -> therefore Cuspate(laurianne) Polar(laurianne) and Cuspate(laurianne) and forall x (Polar(x) and Cuspate(x) -> Famous(x)) -> therefore Famous(laurianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Tedd is enough. Kristel is dismissed. Yule is brash. Dominick is enough. Cold, enough people are not unheeded. Green, brash people are unheeded. Round people are unheeded. If Kristel is zymotic and Kristel is dismissed then Kristel is not enough. All enough people are brash. If someone is enough and brash then they are dismissed. If someone is reduced and not inimical then they are not enough. If Kristel is not enough then Kristel is not unheeded. Tedd is unheeded.", "logic": "\nEnough(tedd)\nDismissed(kristel)\nBrash(yule)\nEnough(dominick)\nforall x (Reduced(x) and Enough(x) -> not Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Brash(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Dismissed(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nZymotic(kristel) and Dismissed(kristel) -> not Enough(kristel)\nforall x (Enough(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Enough(x) and Brash(x) -> Dismissed(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) and not Inimical(x) -> not Enough(x))\nnot Enough(kristel) -> not Unheeded(kristel)\n\nUnheeded(tedd)\n\nEnough(tedd) and forall x (Enough(x) -> Brash(x)) -> therefore Brash(tedd) Enough(tedd) and Brash(tedd) and forall x (Enough(x) and Brash(x) -> Dismissed(x)) -> therefore Dismissed(tedd) Dismissed(tedd) and forall x (Dismissed(x) -> Unheeded(x)) -> therefore Unheeded(tedd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Temple is astir. Percy is cheerful. Daniele is downcast. Eduard is astir. Cold, astir people are not equestrian. Green, downcast people are equestrian. Round people are equestrian. If Percy is poor and Percy is cheerful then Percy is not astir. All astir people are downcast. If someone is astir and downcast then they are cheerful. If someone is unfretted and not whacked then they are not astir. If Percy is not astir then Percy is not equestrian. Temple is not equestrian.", "logic": "\nAstir(temple)\nCheerful(percy)\nDowncast(daniele)\nAstir(eduard)\nforall x (Unfretted(x) and Astir(x) -> not Equestrian(x))\nforall x (Whacked(x) and Downcast(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nforall x (Cheerful(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nPoor(percy) and Cheerful(percy) -> not Astir(percy)\nforall x (Astir(x) -> Downcast(x))\nforall x (Astir(x) and Downcast(x) -> Cheerful(x))\nforall x (Unfretted(x) and not Whacked(x) -> not Astir(x))\nnot Astir(percy) -> not Equestrian(percy)\n\nnot Equestrian(temple)\n\nAstir(temple) and forall x (Astir(x) -> Downcast(x)) -> therefore Downcast(temple) Astir(temple) and Downcast(temple) and forall x (Astir(x) and Downcast(x) -> Cheerful(x)) -> therefore Cheerful(temple) Cheerful(temple) and forall x (Cheerful(x) -> Equestrian(x)) -> therefore Equestrian(temple)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Bary is starboard. Catlin is singable. Cass is lobar. Cheslie is starboard. Cold, starboard people are not tzarist. Green, lobar people are tzarist. Round people are tzarist. If Catlin is bivalve and Catlin is singable then Catlin is not starboard. All starboard people are lobar. If someone is starboard and lobar then they are singable. If someone is campestral and not basined then they are not starboard. If Catlin is not starboard then Catlin is not tzarist. Cass is not tzarist.", "logic": "\nStarboard(bary)\nSingable(catlin)\nLobar(cass)\nStarboard(cheslie)\nforall x (Campestral(x) and Starboard(x) -> not Tzarist(x))\nforall x (Basined(x) and Lobar(x) -> Tzarist(x))\nforall x (Singable(x) -> Tzarist(x))\nBivalve(catlin) and Singable(catlin) -> not Starboard(catlin)\nforall x (Starboard(x) -> Lobar(x))\nforall x (Starboard(x) and Lobar(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Campestral(x) and not Basined(x) -> not Starboard(x))\nnot Starboard(catlin) -> not Tzarist(catlin)\n\nnot Tzarist(cass)\n\nforall x (Singable(x) -> Tzarist(x)) <- forall x (Starboard(x) and Lobar(x) -> Singable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Rem is auditive. Willamina is achy. Tirrell is vaporized. Bennie is auditive. Cold, auditive people are not eyelike. Green, vaporized people are eyelike. Round people are eyelike. If Willamina is definable and Willamina is achy then Willamina is not auditive. All auditive people are vaporized. If someone is auditive and vaporized then they are achy. If someone is nonrandom and not pectoral then they are not auditive. If Willamina is not auditive then Willamina is not eyelike. Willamina is vaporized.", "logic": "\nAuditive(rem)\nAchy(willamina)\nVaporized(tirrell)\nAuditive(bennie)\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and Auditive(x) -> not Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) and Vaporized(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Achy(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nDefinable(willamina) and Achy(willamina) -> not Auditive(willamina)\nforall x (Auditive(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nforall x (Auditive(x) and Vaporized(x) -> Achy(x))\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and not Pectoral(x) -> not Auditive(x))\nnot Auditive(willamina) -> not Eyelike(willamina)\n\nVaporized(willamina)\n\nforall x (Auditive(x) -> Vaporized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Pasquale is unshielded. Rycca is bogus. Maurine is cloudlike. Reeva is unshielded. Cold, unshielded people are not rumpled. Green, cloudlike people are rumpled. Round people are rumpled. If Rycca is overlarge and Rycca is bogus then Rycca is not unshielded. All unshielded people are cloudlike. If someone is unshielded and cloudlike then they are bogus. If someone is indictable and not unsavoury then they are not unshielded. If Rycca is not unshielded then Rycca is not rumpled. Maurine is not bogus.", "logic": "\nUnshielded(pasquale)\nBogus(rycca)\nCloudlike(maurine)\nUnshielded(reeva)\nforall x (Indictable(x) and Unshielded(x) -> not Rumpled(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) and Cloudlike(x) -> Rumpled(x))\nforall x (Bogus(x) -> Rumpled(x))\nOverlarge(rycca) and Bogus(rycca) -> not Unshielded(rycca)\nforall x (Unshielded(x) -> Cloudlike(x))\nforall x (Unshielded(x) and Cloudlike(x) -> Bogus(x))\nforall x (Indictable(x) and not Unsavoury(x) -> not Unshielded(x))\nnot Unshielded(rycca) -> not Rumpled(rycca)\n\nnot Bogus(maurine)\n\nforall x (Unshielded(x) and Cloudlike(x) -> Bogus(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Isaac is orderly. Alanna is untimely. Hulda is hellish. Agatha is orderly. Cold, orderly people are not scholarly. Green, hellish people are scholarly. Round people are scholarly. If Alanna is innumerate and Alanna is untimely then Alanna is not orderly. All orderly people are hellish. If someone is orderly and hellish then they are untimely. If someone is palpatory and not trilobed then they are not orderly. If Alanna is not orderly then Alanna is not scholarly. Isaac is palpatory.", "logic": "\nOrderly(isaac)\nUntimely(alanna)\nHellish(hulda)\nOrderly(agatha)\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Orderly(x) -> not Scholarly(x))\nforall x (Trilobed(x) and Hellish(x) -> Scholarly(x))\nforall x (Untimely(x) -> Scholarly(x))\nInnumerate(alanna) and Untimely(alanna) -> not Orderly(alanna)\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Hellish(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) and Hellish(x) -> Untimely(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and not Trilobed(x) -> not Orderly(x))\nnot Orderly(alanna) -> not Scholarly(alanna)\n\nPalpatory(isaac)\n\nPalpatory(isaac) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Staffard is aphyllous. Jacqui is kafkaesque. Felicdad is planetal. Neilla is aphyllous. Cold, aphyllous people are not amyloid. Green, planetal people are amyloid. Round people are amyloid. If Jacqui is budding and Jacqui is kafkaesque then Jacqui is not aphyllous. All aphyllous people are planetal. If someone is aphyllous and planetal then they are kafkaesque. If someone is unstirred and not unlivable then they are not aphyllous. If Jacqui is not aphyllous then Jacqui is not amyloid. Neilla is not unlivable.", "logic": "\nAphyllous(staffard)\nKafkaesque(jacqui)\nPlanetal(felicdad)\nAphyllous(neilla)\nforall x (Unstirred(x) and Aphyllous(x) -> not Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Planetal(x) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) -> Amyloid(x))\nBudding(jacqui) and Kafkaesque(jacqui) -> not Aphyllous(jacqui)\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) -> Planetal(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) and Planetal(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nforall x (Unstirred(x) and not Unlivable(x) -> not Aphyllous(x))\nnot Aphyllous(jacqui) -> not Amyloid(jacqui)\n\nnot Unlivable(neilla)\n\nnot Unlivable(neilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Yoko is sleeping. Norean is organised. Olivette is lengthwise. Henka is sleeping. Cold, sleeping people are not conceited. Green, lengthwise people are conceited. Round people are conceited. If Norean is anatomic and Norean is organised then Norean is not sleeping. All sleeping people are lengthwise. If someone is sleeping and lengthwise then they are organised. If someone is functional and not surd then they are not sleeping. If Norean is not sleeping then Norean is not conceited. Yoko is anatomic.", "logic": "\nSleeping(yoko)\nOrganised(norean)\nLengthwise(olivette)\nSleeping(henka)\nforall x (Functional(x) and Sleeping(x) -> not Conceited(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) and Lengthwise(x) -> Conceited(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) -> Conceited(x))\nAnatomic(norean) and Organised(norean) -> not Sleeping(norean)\nforall x (Sleeping(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) and Lengthwise(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Functional(x) and not Surd(x) -> not Sleeping(x))\nnot Sleeping(norean) -> not Conceited(norean)\n\nAnatomic(yoko)\n\nAnatomic(yoko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Dita is statute. Dari is indebted. Rissa is zairean. Thorpe is statute. Cold, statute people are not patented. Green, zairean people are patented. Round people are patented. If Dari is isochronal and Dari is indebted then Dari is not statute. All statute people are zairean. If someone is statute and zairean then they are indebted. If someone is such and not evidential then they are not statute. If Dari is not statute then Dari is not patented. Dari is not evidential.", "logic": "\nStatute(dita)\nIndebted(dari)\nZairean(rissa)\nStatute(thorpe)\nforall x (Such(x) and Statute(x) -> not Patented(x))\nforall x (Evidential(x) and Zairean(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) -> Patented(x))\nIsochronal(dari) and Indebted(dari) -> not Statute(dari)\nforall x (Statute(x) -> Zairean(x))\nforall x (Statute(x) and Zairean(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Such(x) and not Evidential(x) -> not Statute(x))\nnot Statute(dari) -> not Patented(dari)\n\nnot Evidential(dari)\n\nnot Evidential(dari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Corina is outward. Humphrey is dissoluble. Hanford is unlovely. Taber is outward. Cold, outward people are not utopian. Green, unlovely people are utopian. Round people are utopian. If Humphrey is javanese and Humphrey is dissoluble then Humphrey is not outward. All outward people are unlovely. If someone is outward and unlovely then they are dissoluble. If someone is verbal and not orotund then they are not outward. If Humphrey is not outward then Humphrey is not utopian. Hanford is orotund.", "logic": "\nOutward(corina)\nDissoluble(humphrey)\nUnlovely(hanford)\nOutward(taber)\nforall x (Verbal(x) and Outward(x) -> not Utopian(x))\nforall x (Orotund(x) and Unlovely(x) -> Utopian(x))\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) -> Utopian(x))\nJavanese(humphrey) and Dissoluble(humphrey) -> not Outward(humphrey)\nforall x (Outward(x) -> Unlovely(x))\nforall x (Outward(x) and Unlovely(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Verbal(x) and not Orotund(x) -> not Outward(x))\nnot Outward(humphrey) -> not Utopian(humphrey)\n\nOrotund(hanford)\n\nOrotund(hanford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Tarzan is incidental. Timi is embattled. Imojean is shellproof. Eldon is astomatous. All shellproof things are prototypal. All astomatous things are fevered. All fevered things are grainy. If something is prototypal then it is embattled. If something is fevered then it is grainy. Big, grainy things are prototypal. All astomatous things are fevered. If something is fevered then it is embattled. Tarzan is incidental.", "logic": "\nIncidental(tarzan)\nEmbattled(timi)\nShellproof(imojean)\nAstomatous(eldon)\nforall x (Shellproof(x) -> Prototypal(x))\nforall x (Astomatous(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) -> Grainy(x))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) -> Embattled(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) -> Grainy(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) and Grainy(x) -> Prototypal(x))\nforall x (Astomatous(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) -> Embattled(x))\n\nIncidental(tarzan)\n\ntherefore Incidental(tarzan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Anallise is seaborne. Novelia is anuran. Patric is deadened. Gwenette is sceptred. All deadened things are rubbery. All sceptred things are childless. All childless things are idiotic. If something is rubbery then it is anuran. If something is childless then it is idiotic. Big, idiotic things are rubbery. All sceptred things are childless. If something is childless then it is anuran. Novelia is not anuran.", "logic": "\nSeaborne(anallise)\nAnuran(novelia)\nDeadened(patric)\nSceptred(gwenette)\nforall x (Deadened(x) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Sceptred(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Rubbery(x) -> Anuran(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Anuran(x) and Idiotic(x) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Sceptred(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Anuran(x))\n\nnot Anuran(novelia)\n\ntherefore Anuran(novelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Jacinda is empathic. Cris is streaming. Danica is gray. Nealson is asunder. All gray things are deltoid. All asunder things are unrhythmic. All unrhythmic things are moorish. If something is deltoid then it is streaming. If something is unrhythmic then it is moorish. Big, moorish things are deltoid. All asunder things are unrhythmic. If something is unrhythmic then it is streaming. Danica is deltoid.", "logic": "\nEmpathic(jacinda)\nStreaming(cris)\nGray(danica)\nAsunder(nealson)\nforall x (Gray(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Asunder(x) -> Unrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) -> Moorish(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) -> Streaming(x))\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) -> Moorish(x))\nforall x (Streaming(x) and Moorish(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Asunder(x) -> Unrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Unrhythmic(x) -> Streaming(x))\n\nDeltoid(danica)\n\nGray(danica) and forall x (Gray(x) -> Deltoid(x)) -> therefore Deltoid(danica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Randell is andante. Silvio is chapped. Kenneth is statuary. Amandie is virtuous. All statuary things are vociferous. All virtuous things are bypast. All bypast things are cupric. If something is vociferous then it is chapped. If something is bypast then it is cupric. Big, cupric things are vociferous. All virtuous things are bypast. If something is bypast then it is chapped. Kenneth is not vociferous.", "logic": "\nAndante(randell)\nChapped(silvio)\nStatuary(kenneth)\nVirtuous(amandie)\nforall x (Statuary(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Bypast(x))\nforall x (Bypast(x) -> Cupric(x))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Chapped(x))\nforall x (Bypast(x) -> Cupric(x))\nforall x (Chapped(x) and Cupric(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Bypast(x))\nforall x (Bypast(x) -> Chapped(x))\n\nnot Vociferous(kenneth)\n\nStatuary(kenneth) and forall x (Statuary(x) -> Vociferous(x)) -> therefore Vociferous(kenneth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Edin is thickset. Kare is grilled. Barny is unlikable. Cicely is jaunty. All unlikable things are laminal. All jaunty things are finical. All finical things are ingenious. If something is laminal then it is grilled. If something is finical then it is ingenious. Big, ingenious things are laminal. All jaunty things are finical. If something is finical then it is grilled. Cicely is ingenious.", "logic": "\nThickset(edin)\nGrilled(kare)\nUnlikable(barny)\nJaunty(cicely)\nforall x (Unlikable(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Jaunty(x) -> Finical(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Laminal(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Grilled(x) and Ingenious(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Jaunty(x) -> Finical(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Grilled(x))\n\nIngenious(cicely)\n\nJaunty(cicely) and forall x (Jaunty(x) -> Finical(x)) -> therefore Finical(cicely) Finical(cicely) and forall x (Finical(x) -> Ingenious(x)) -> therefore Ingenious(cicely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Michelle is unsaid. Vern is topless. Harri is shitty. Juliana is peaked. All shitty things are elemental. All peaked things are civilised. All civilised things are obviating. If something is elemental then it is topless. If something is civilised then it is obviating. Big, obviating things are elemental. All peaked things are civilised. If something is civilised then it is topless. Harri is not topless.", "logic": "\nUnsaid(michelle)\nTopless(vern)\nShitty(harri)\nPeaked(juliana)\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Elemental(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) -> Civilised(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Elemental(x) -> Topless(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Topless(x) and Obviating(x) -> Elemental(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) -> Civilised(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Topless(x))\n\nnot Topless(harri)\n\nShitty(harri) and forall x (Shitty(x) -> Elemental(x)) -> therefore Elemental(harri) Elemental(harri) and forall x (Elemental(x) -> Topless(x)) -> therefore Topless(harri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Codie is planktonic. Stephine is populous. Dotti is perforate. Alvira is relaxed. All perforate things are definite. All relaxed things are orderly. All orderly things are xxxi. If something is definite then it is populous. If something is orderly then it is xxxi. Big, xxxi things are definite. All relaxed things are orderly. If something is orderly then it is populous. Alvira is definite.", "logic": "\nPlanktonic(codie)\nPopulous(stephine)\nPerforate(dotti)\nRelaxed(alvira)\nforall x (Perforate(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Relaxed(x) -> Orderly(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Xxxi(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Xxxi(x))\nforall x (Populous(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Relaxed(x) -> Orderly(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Populous(x))\n\nDefinite(alvira)\n\nRelaxed(alvira) and forall x (Relaxed(x) -> Orderly(x)) -> therefore Orderly(alvira) Orderly(alvira) and forall x (Orderly(x) -> Populous(x)) -> therefore Populous(alvira) Relaxed(alvira) and forall x (Relaxed(x) -> Orderly(x)) -> therefore Orderly(alvira) Orderly(alvira) and forall x (Orderly(x) -> Xxxi(x)) -> therefore Xxxi(alvira) Populous(alvira) and Xxxi(alvira) and forall x (Populous(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Definite(x)) -> therefore Definite(alvira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Lorry is regardless. Gregor is slumbery. Fulvia is weightless. Yetty is trillionth. All weightless things are hispid. All trillionth things are symbolical. All symbolical things are orphic. If something is hispid then it is slumbery. If something is symbolical then it is orphic. Big, orphic things are hispid. All trillionth things are symbolical. If something is symbolical then it is slumbery. Yetty is not hispid.", "logic": "\nRegardless(lorry)\nSlumbery(gregor)\nWeightless(fulvia)\nTrillionth(yetty)\nforall x (Weightless(x) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Trillionth(x) -> Symbolical(x))\nforall x (Symbolical(x) -> Orphic(x))\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Slumbery(x))\nforall x (Symbolical(x) -> Orphic(x))\nforall x (Slumbery(x) and Orphic(x) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Trillionth(x) -> Symbolical(x))\nforall x (Symbolical(x) -> Slumbery(x))\n\nnot Hispid(yetty)\n\nTrillionth(yetty) and forall x (Trillionth(x) -> Symbolical(x)) -> therefore Symbolical(yetty) Symbolical(yetty) and forall x (Symbolical(x) -> Slumbery(x)) -> therefore Slumbery(yetty) Trillionth(yetty) and forall x (Trillionth(x) -> Symbolical(x)) -> therefore Symbolical(yetty) Symbolical(yetty) and forall x (Symbolical(x) -> Orphic(x)) -> therefore Orphic(yetty) Slumbery(yetty) and Orphic(yetty) and forall x (Slumbery(x) and Orphic(x) -> Hispid(x)) -> therefore Hispid(yetty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Eunice is uncovered. Roth is ovular. Gwenore is flowerless. Tiffanie is super. All flowerless things are mediocre. All super things are timid. All timid things are shamed. If something is mediocre then it is ovular. If something is timid then it is shamed. Big, shamed things are mediocre. All super things are timid. If something is timid then it is ovular. Gwenore is not timid.", "logic": "\nUncovered(eunice)\nOvular(roth)\nFlowerless(gwenore)\nSuper(tiffanie)\nforall x (Flowerless(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Super(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Shamed(x))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Shamed(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) and Shamed(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Super(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Ovular(x))\n\nnot Timid(gwenore)\n\nforall x (Super(x) -> Timid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Rafaela is gracile. Shelba is collegial. Cherise is moody. Teresina is savorless. All moody things are preanal. All savorless things are sparkling. All sparkling things are detonative. If something is preanal then it is collegial. If something is sparkling then it is detonative. Big, detonative things are preanal. All savorless things are sparkling. If something is sparkling then it is collegial. Shelba is detonative.", "logic": "\nGracile(rafaela)\nCollegial(shelba)\nMoody(cherise)\nSavorless(teresina)\nforall x (Moody(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Savorless(x) -> Sparkling(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) -> Detonative(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Collegial(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) -> Detonative(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) and Detonative(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Savorless(x) -> Sparkling(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) -> Collegial(x))\n\nDetonative(shelba)\n\nforall x (Sparkling(x) -> Detonative(x)) <- forall x (Savorless(x) -> Sparkling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Leonard is ionic. Corri is latticed. Kaster is serbian. Gertrudis is teensy. All serbian things are inherited. All teensy things are abkhazian. All abkhazian things are unlikely. If something is inherited then it is latticed. If something is abkhazian then it is unlikely. Big, unlikely things are inherited. All teensy things are abkhazian. If something is abkhazian then it is latticed. Leonard is not abkhazian.", "logic": "\nIonic(leonard)\nLatticed(corri)\nSerbian(kaster)\nTeensy(gertrudis)\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Inherited(x))\nforall x (Teensy(x) -> Abkhazian(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Unlikely(x))\nforall x (Inherited(x) -> Latticed(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Unlikely(x))\nforall x (Latticed(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Inherited(x))\nforall x (Teensy(x) -> Abkhazian(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Latticed(x))\n\nnot Abkhazian(leonard)\n\nforall x (Teensy(x) -> Abkhazian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Bobby is innumerate. Thorny is aquiline. Camile is okay. Morse is indigent. All okay things are verified. All indigent things are avellan. All avellan things are motile. If something is verified then it is aquiline. If something is avellan then it is motile. Big, motile things are verified. All indigent things are avellan. If something is avellan then it is aquiline. Thorny is verified.", "logic": "\nInnumerate(bobby)\nAquiline(thorny)\nOkay(camile)\nIndigent(morse)\nforall x (Okay(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Indigent(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Motile(x))\nforall x (Verified(x) -> Aquiline(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Motile(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Motile(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Indigent(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Aquiline(x))\n\nVerified(thorny)\n\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Motile(x) -> Verified(x)) <- forall x (Avellan(x) -> Motile(x)) <- forall x (Indigent(x) -> Avellan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Darren is preclusive. Aldus is simulated. Gerome is staggering. Ellissa is lincolnian. All staggering things are seminal. All lincolnian things are impolite. All impolite things are acidulent. If something is seminal then it is simulated. If something is impolite then it is acidulent. Big, acidulent things are seminal. All lincolnian things are impolite. If something is impolite then it is simulated. Gerome is not lincolnian.", "logic": "\nPreclusive(darren)\nSimulated(aldus)\nStaggering(gerome)\nLincolnian(ellissa)\nforall x (Staggering(x) -> Seminal(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Seminal(x) -> Simulated(x))\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) and Acidulent(x) -> Seminal(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Simulated(x))\n\nnot Lincolnian(gerome)\n\nnot Lincolnian(gerome) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Florenza is tidy. Indira is mossy. Thornton is boracic. Eulalie is kingly. All boracic things are baggy. All kingly things are randy. All randy things are mazy. If something is baggy then it is mossy. If something is randy then it is mazy. Big, mazy things are baggy. All kingly things are randy. If something is randy then it is mossy. Florenza is kingly.", "logic": "\nTidy(florenza)\nMossy(indira)\nBoracic(thornton)\nKingly(eulalie)\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Kingly(x) -> Randy(x))\nforall x (Randy(x) -> Mazy(x))\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Mossy(x))\nforall x (Randy(x) -> Mazy(x))\nforall x (Mossy(x) and Mazy(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Kingly(x) -> Randy(x))\nforall x (Randy(x) -> Mossy(x))\n\nKingly(florenza)\n\nKingly(florenza) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Kyla is tractive. Marv is loath. Tricia is estranging. Beverly is rampant. All estranging things are insistent. All rampant things are pervasive. All pervasive things are gorgeous. If something is insistent then it is loath. If something is pervasive then it is gorgeous. Big, gorgeous things are insistent. All rampant things are pervasive. If something is pervasive then it is loath. Marv is not estranging.", "logic": "\nTractive(kyla)\nLoath(marv)\nEstranging(tricia)\nRampant(beverly)\nforall x (Estranging(x) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Rampant(x) -> Pervasive(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) -> Gorgeous(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) -> Loath(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) -> Gorgeous(x))\nforall x (Loath(x) and Gorgeous(x) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Rampant(x) -> Pervasive(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) -> Loath(x))\n\nnot Estranging(marv)\n\nnot Estranging(marv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Ibby is exothermal. Gus is barehanded. Anitra is monstrous. Velvet is cathectic. All monstrous things are subversive. All cathectic things are lxxviii. All lxxviii things are expired. If something is subversive then it is barehanded. If something is lxxviii then it is expired. Big, expired things are subversive. All cathectic things are lxxviii. If something is lxxviii then it is barehanded. Velvet is monstrous.", "logic": "\nExothermal(ibby)\nBarehanded(gus)\nMonstrous(anitra)\nCathectic(velvet)\nforall x (Monstrous(x) -> Subversive(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> Expired(x))\nforall x (Subversive(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> Expired(x))\nforall x (Barehanded(x) and Expired(x) -> Subversive(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> Barehanded(x))\n\nMonstrous(velvet)\n\nMonstrous(velvet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "The jacinda poll the agnese. The jacinda poll the desmond. The jacinda overbid the desmond. The dagmar is tannic. The dagmar interlope the desmond. The agnese is gelid. The agnese interlope the dagmar. The desmond overbid the dagmar. The desmond does not see the agnese. The desmond interlope the agnese. If something interlope the agnese then it is steadfast. If something is steadfast then it interlope the jacinda. If something overbid the agnese and it is tannic then the agnese poll the desmond. If something is steadfast then it is tannic. If the jacinda does not chase the agnese then the agnese is gelid. All tannic things are gelid. The jacinda poll the agnese.", "logic": "\nPoll(jacinda, agnese)\nPoll(jacinda, desmond)\nOverbid(jacinda, desmond)\nTannic(dagmar)\nInterlope(dagmar, desmond)\nGelid(agnese)\nInterlope(agnese, dagmar)\nOverbid(desmond, dagmar)\nnot Overbid(desmond, agnese)\nInterlope(desmond, agnese)\nforall x (Interlope(x, agnese) -> Steadfast(x))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) -> Interlope(x, jacinda))\nforall x (Overbid(x, agnese) and Tannic(x) -> Poll(agnese, desmond))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) -> Tannic(x))\nnot Poll(jacinda, agnese) -> Gelid(agnese)\nforall x (Tannic(x) -> Gelid(x))\n\nPoll(jacinda, agnese)\n\ntherefore Poll(jacinda, agnese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The delora lack the adams. The delora lack the christin. The delora overlay the christin. The karrie is fuggy. The karrie bloody the christin. The adams is recoilless. The adams bloody the karrie. The christin overlay the karrie. The christin does not see the adams. The christin bloody the adams. If something bloody the adams then it is overhead. If something is overhead then it bloody the delora. If something overlay the adams and it is fuggy then the adams lack the christin. If something is overhead then it is fuggy. If the delora does not chase the adams then the adams is recoilless. All fuggy things are recoilless. The adams does not visit the karrie.", "logic": "\nLack(delora, adams)\nLack(delora, christin)\nOverlay(delora, christin)\nFuggy(karrie)\nBloody(karrie, christin)\nRecoilless(adams)\nBloody(adams, karrie)\nOverlay(christin, karrie)\nnot Overlay(christin, adams)\nBloody(christin, adams)\nforall x (Bloody(x, adams) -> Overhead(x))\nforall x (Overhead(x) -> Bloody(x, delora))\nforall x (Overlay(x, adams) and Fuggy(x) -> Lack(adams, christin))\nforall x (Overhead(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nnot Lack(delora, adams) -> Recoilless(adams)\nforall x (Fuggy(x) -> Recoilless(x))\n\nnot Bloody(adams, karrie)\n\ntherefore Bloody(adams, karrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The rissa disk the rinaldo. The rissa disk the jennings. The rissa mentor the jennings. The shelden is sabahan. The shelden baby the jennings. The rinaldo is downstair. The rinaldo baby the shelden. The jennings mentor the shelden. The jennings does not see the rinaldo. The jennings baby the rinaldo. If something baby the rinaldo then it is palmlike. If something is palmlike then it baby the rissa. If something mentor the rinaldo and it is sabahan then the rinaldo disk the jennings. If something is palmlike then it is sabahan. If the rissa does not chase the rinaldo then the rinaldo is downstair. All sabahan things are downstair. The jennings is palmlike.", "logic": "\nDisk(rissa, rinaldo)\nDisk(rissa, jennings)\nMentor(rissa, jennings)\nSabahan(shelden)\nBaby(shelden, jennings)\nDownstair(rinaldo)\nBaby(rinaldo, shelden)\nMentor(jennings, shelden)\nnot Mentor(jennings, rinaldo)\nBaby(jennings, rinaldo)\nforall x (Baby(x, rinaldo) -> Palmlike(x))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) -> Baby(x, rissa))\nforall x (Mentor(x, rinaldo) and Sabahan(x) -> Disk(rinaldo, jennings))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nnot Disk(rissa, rinaldo) -> Downstair(rinaldo)\nforall x (Sabahan(x) -> Downstair(x))\n\nPalmlike(jennings)\n\nBaby(jennings, rinaldo) and forall x (Baby(x, rinaldo) -> Palmlike(x)) -> therefore Palmlike(jennings)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The joela skirt the jewell. The joela skirt the teresa. The joela accouter the teresa. The thedric is atrip. The thedric invoice the teresa. The jewell is elliptic. The jewell invoice the thedric. The teresa accouter the thedric. The teresa does not see the jewell. The teresa invoice the jewell. If something invoice the jewell then it is polyglot. If something is polyglot then it invoice the joela. If something accouter the jewell and it is atrip then the jewell skirt the teresa. If something is polyglot then it is atrip. If the joela does not chase the jewell then the jewell is elliptic. All atrip things are elliptic. The teresa is not polyglot.", "logic": "\nSkirt(joela, jewell)\nSkirt(joela, teresa)\nAccouter(joela, teresa)\nAtrip(thedric)\nInvoice(thedric, teresa)\nElliptic(jewell)\nInvoice(jewell, thedric)\nAccouter(teresa, thedric)\nnot Accouter(teresa, jewell)\nInvoice(teresa, jewell)\nforall x (Invoice(x, jewell) -> Polyglot(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) -> Invoice(x, joela))\nforall x (Accouter(x, jewell) and Atrip(x) -> Skirt(jewell, teresa))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) -> Atrip(x))\nnot Skirt(joela, jewell) -> Elliptic(jewell)\nforall x (Atrip(x) -> Elliptic(x))\n\nnot Polyglot(teresa)\n\nInvoice(teresa, jewell) and forall x (Invoice(x, jewell) -> Polyglot(x)) -> therefore Polyglot(teresa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The madel crick the casia. The madel crick the moria. The madel give the moria. The bernadina is exoergic. The bernadina pock the moria. The casia is whacked. The casia pock the bernadina. The moria give the bernadina. The moria does not see the casia. The moria pock the casia. If something pock the casia then it is congenial. If something is congenial then it pock the madel. If something give the casia and it is exoergic then the casia crick the moria. If something is congenial then it is exoergic. If the madel does not chase the casia then the casia is whacked. All exoergic things are whacked. The moria is exoergic.", "logic": "\nCrick(madel, casia)\nCrick(madel, moria)\nGive(madel, moria)\nExoergic(bernadina)\nPock(bernadina, moria)\nWhacked(casia)\nPock(casia, bernadina)\nGive(moria, bernadina)\nnot Give(moria, casia)\nPock(moria, casia)\nforall x (Pock(x, casia) -> Congenial(x))\nforall x (Congenial(x) -> Pock(x, madel))\nforall x (Give(x, casia) and Exoergic(x) -> Crick(casia, moria))\nforall x (Congenial(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nnot Crick(madel, casia) -> Whacked(casia)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Whacked(x))\n\nExoergic(moria)\n\nPock(moria, casia) and forall x (Pock(x, casia) -> Congenial(x)) -> therefore Congenial(moria) Congenial(moria) and forall x (Congenial(x) -> Exoergic(x)) -> therefore Exoergic(moria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The ammamaria curdle the delila. The ammamaria curdle the locke. The ammamaria undulate the locke. The bharat is norman. The bharat pullulate the locke. The delila is bivalent. The delila pullulate the bharat. The locke undulate the bharat. The locke does not see the delila. The locke pullulate the delila. If something pullulate the delila then it is uncomely. If something is uncomely then it pullulate the ammamaria. If something undulate the delila and it is norman then the delila curdle the locke. If something is uncomely then it is norman. If the ammamaria does not chase the delila then the delila is bivalent. All norman things are bivalent. The locke is not norman.", "logic": "\nCurdle(ammamaria, delila)\nCurdle(ammamaria, locke)\nUndulate(ammamaria, locke)\nNorman(bharat)\nPullulate(bharat, locke)\nBivalent(delila)\nPullulate(delila, bharat)\nUndulate(locke, bharat)\nnot Undulate(locke, delila)\nPullulate(locke, delila)\nforall x (Pullulate(x, delila) -> Uncomely(x))\nforall x (Uncomely(x) -> Pullulate(x, ammamaria))\nforall x (Undulate(x, delila) and Norman(x) -> Curdle(delila, locke))\nforall x (Uncomely(x) -> Norman(x))\nnot Curdle(ammamaria, delila) -> Bivalent(delila)\nforall x (Norman(x) -> Bivalent(x))\n\nnot Norman(locke)\n\nPullulate(locke, delila) and forall x (Pullulate(x, delila) -> Uncomely(x)) -> therefore Uncomely(locke) Uncomely(locke) and forall x (Uncomely(x) -> Norman(x)) -> therefore Norman(locke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The modestine mongrelize the darcey. The modestine mongrelize the alicea. The modestine insulate the alicea. The robinetta is girlish. The robinetta unchurch the alicea. The darcey is formidable. The darcey unchurch the robinetta. The alicea insulate the robinetta. The alicea does not see the darcey. The alicea unchurch the darcey. If something unchurch the darcey then it is snappy. If something is snappy then it unchurch the modestine. If something insulate the darcey and it is girlish then the darcey mongrelize the alicea. If something is snappy then it is girlish. If the modestine does not chase the darcey then the darcey is formidable. All girlish things are formidable. The alicea is formidable.", "logic": "\nMongrelize(modestine, darcey)\nMongrelize(modestine, alicea)\nInsulate(modestine, alicea)\nGirlish(robinetta)\nUnchurch(robinetta, alicea)\nFormidable(darcey)\nUnchurch(darcey, robinetta)\nInsulate(alicea, robinetta)\nnot Insulate(alicea, darcey)\nUnchurch(alicea, darcey)\nforall x (Unchurch(x, darcey) -> Snappy(x))\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> Unchurch(x, modestine))\nforall x (Insulate(x, darcey) and Girlish(x) -> Mongrelize(darcey, alicea))\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> Girlish(x))\nnot Mongrelize(modestine, darcey) -> Formidable(darcey)\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Formidable(x))\n\nFormidable(alicea)\n\nUnchurch(alicea, darcey) and forall x (Unchurch(x, darcey) -> Snappy(x)) -> therefore Snappy(alicea) Snappy(alicea) and forall x (Snappy(x) -> Girlish(x)) -> therefore Girlish(alicea) Girlish(alicea) and forall x (Girlish(x) -> Formidable(x)) -> therefore Formidable(alicea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The krista hand the brant. The krista hand the arlie. The krista require the arlie. The stevana is plus. The stevana importune the arlie. The brant is underclass. The brant importune the stevana. The arlie require the stevana. The arlie does not see the brant. The arlie importune the brant. If something importune the brant then it is uptown. If something is uptown then it importune the krista. If something require the brant and it is plus then the brant hand the arlie. If something is uptown then it is plus. If the krista does not chase the brant then the brant is underclass. All plus things are underclass. The arlie is not underclass.", "logic": "\nHand(krista, brant)\nHand(krista, arlie)\nRequire(krista, arlie)\nPlus(stevana)\nImportune(stevana, arlie)\nUnderclass(brant)\nImportune(brant, stevana)\nRequire(arlie, stevana)\nnot Require(arlie, brant)\nImportune(arlie, brant)\nforall x (Importune(x, brant) -> Uptown(x))\nforall x (Uptown(x) -> Importune(x, krista))\nforall x (Require(x, brant) and Plus(x) -> Hand(brant, arlie))\nforall x (Uptown(x) -> Plus(x))\nnot Hand(krista, brant) -> Underclass(brant)\nforall x (Plus(x) -> Underclass(x))\n\nnot Underclass(arlie)\n\nImportune(arlie, brant) and forall x (Importune(x, brant) -> Uptown(x)) -> therefore Uptown(arlie) Uptown(arlie) and forall x (Uptown(x) -> Plus(x)) -> therefore Plus(arlie) Plus(arlie) and forall x (Plus(x) -> Underclass(x)) -> therefore Underclass(arlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The patsy clink the amy. The patsy clink the wilburn. The patsy please the wilburn. The connie is closed. The connie chink the wilburn. The amy is andean. The amy chink the connie. The wilburn please the connie. The wilburn does not see the amy. The wilburn chink the amy. If something chink the amy then it is inflatable. If something is inflatable then it chink the patsy. If something please the amy and it is closed then the amy clink the wilburn. If something is inflatable then it is closed. If the patsy does not chase the amy then the amy is andean. All closed things are andean. The amy does not chase the wilburn.", "logic": "\nClink(patsy, amy)\nClink(patsy, wilburn)\nPlease(patsy, wilburn)\nClosed(connie)\nChink(connie, wilburn)\nAndean(amy)\nChink(amy, connie)\nPlease(wilburn, connie)\nnot Please(wilburn, amy)\nChink(wilburn, amy)\nforall x (Chink(x, amy) -> Inflatable(x))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) -> Chink(x, patsy))\nforall x (Please(x, amy) and Closed(x) -> Clink(amy, wilburn))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) -> Closed(x))\nnot Clink(patsy, amy) -> Andean(amy)\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Andean(x))\n\nnot Clink(amy, wilburn)\n\nforall x (Please(x, amy) and Closed(x) -> Clink(amy, wilburn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The rosabelle take the noach. The rosabelle take the gunvor. The rosabelle swop the gunvor. The mindy is wandering. The mindy uglify the gunvor. The noach is extrusive. The noach uglify the mindy. The gunvor swop the mindy. The gunvor does not see the noach. The gunvor uglify the noach. If something uglify the noach then it is aneurysmal. If something is aneurysmal then it uglify the rosabelle. If something swop the noach and it is wandering then the noach take the gunvor. If something is aneurysmal then it is wandering. If the rosabelle does not chase the noach then the noach is extrusive. All wandering things are extrusive. The noach is wandering.", "logic": "\nTake(rosabelle, noach)\nTake(rosabelle, gunvor)\nSwop(rosabelle, gunvor)\nWandering(mindy)\nUglify(mindy, gunvor)\nExtrusive(noach)\nUglify(noach, mindy)\nSwop(gunvor, mindy)\nnot Swop(gunvor, noach)\nUglify(gunvor, noach)\nforall x (Uglify(x, noach) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Uglify(x, rosabelle))\nforall x (Swop(x, noach) and Wandering(x) -> Take(noach, gunvor))\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Wandering(x))\nnot Take(rosabelle, noach) -> Extrusive(noach)\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> Extrusive(x))\n\nWandering(noach)\n\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Wandering(x)) <- forall x (Uglify(x, noach) -> Aneurysmal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The federico like the ben. The federico like the mugsy. The federico retard the mugsy. The lynea is unleaded. The lynea chagrin the mugsy. The ben is metaphoric. The ben chagrin the lynea. The mugsy retard the lynea. The mugsy does not see the ben. The mugsy chagrin the ben. If something chagrin the ben then it is chelonian. If something is chelonian then it chagrin the federico. If something retard the ben and it is unleaded then the ben like the mugsy. If something is chelonian then it is unleaded. If the federico does not chase the ben then the ben is metaphoric. All unleaded things are metaphoric. The lynea is not chelonian.", "logic": "\nLike(federico, ben)\nLike(federico, mugsy)\nRetard(federico, mugsy)\nUnleaded(lynea)\nChagrin(lynea, mugsy)\nMetaphoric(ben)\nChagrin(ben, lynea)\nRetard(mugsy, lynea)\nnot Retard(mugsy, ben)\nChagrin(mugsy, ben)\nforall x (Chagrin(x, ben) -> Chelonian(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Chagrin(x, federico))\nforall x (Retard(x, ben) and Unleaded(x) -> Like(ben, mugsy))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Unleaded(x))\nnot Like(federico, ben) -> Metaphoric(ben)\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\n\nnot Chelonian(lynea)\n\nforall x (Chagrin(x, ben) -> Chelonian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The suzetta mortise the dore. The suzetta mortise the henriette. The suzetta nurture the henriette. The jillana is agreeable. The jillana cage the henriette. The dore is papery. The dore cage the jillana. The henriette nurture the jillana. The henriette does not see the dore. The henriette cage the dore. If something cage the dore then it is formidable. If something is formidable then it cage the suzetta. If something nurture the dore and it is agreeable then the dore mortise the henriette. If something is formidable then it is agreeable. If the suzetta does not chase the dore then the dore is papery. All agreeable things are papery. The dore cage the suzetta.", "logic": "\nMortise(suzetta, dore)\nMortise(suzetta, henriette)\nNurture(suzetta, henriette)\nAgreeable(jillana)\nCage(jillana, henriette)\nPapery(dore)\nCage(dore, jillana)\nNurture(henriette, jillana)\nnot Nurture(henriette, dore)\nCage(henriette, dore)\nforall x (Cage(x, dore) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Cage(x, suzetta))\nforall x (Nurture(x, dore) and Agreeable(x) -> Mortise(dore, henriette))\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Agreeable(x))\nnot Mortise(suzetta, dore) -> Papery(dore)\nforall x (Agreeable(x) -> Papery(x))\n\nCage(dore, suzetta)\n\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Cage(x, suzetta)) <- forall x (Cage(x, dore) -> Formidable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The romeo unmuzzle the kathlin. The romeo unmuzzle the shirlee. The romeo dash the shirlee. The berty is astringent. The berty gormandise the shirlee. The kathlin is antiphonal. The kathlin gormandise the berty. The shirlee dash the berty. The shirlee does not see the kathlin. The shirlee gormandise the kathlin. If something gormandise the kathlin then it is bratty. If something is bratty then it gormandise the romeo. If something dash the kathlin and it is astringent then the kathlin unmuzzle the shirlee. If something is bratty then it is astringent. If the romeo does not chase the kathlin then the kathlin is antiphonal. All astringent things are antiphonal. The kathlin does not see the kathlin.", "logic": "\nUnmuzzle(romeo, kathlin)\nUnmuzzle(romeo, shirlee)\nDash(romeo, shirlee)\nAstringent(berty)\nGormandise(berty, shirlee)\nAntiphonal(kathlin)\nGormandise(kathlin, berty)\nDash(shirlee, berty)\nnot Dash(shirlee, kathlin)\nGormandise(shirlee, kathlin)\nforall x (Gormandise(x, kathlin) -> Bratty(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Gormandise(x, romeo))\nforall x (Dash(x, kathlin) and Astringent(x) -> Unmuzzle(kathlin, shirlee))\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Astringent(x))\nnot Unmuzzle(romeo, kathlin) -> Antiphonal(kathlin)\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\n\nnot Dash(kathlin, kathlin)\n\nnot Dash(kathlin, kathlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The barri scald the lois. The barri scald the kylila. The barri vilipend the kylila. The kathye is thickening. The kathye gull the kylila. The lois is lunar. The lois gull the kathye. The kylila vilipend the kathye. The kylila does not see the lois. The kylila gull the lois. If something gull the lois then it is aspheric. If something is aspheric then it gull the barri. If something vilipend the lois and it is thickening then the lois scald the kylila. If something is aspheric then it is thickening. If the barri does not chase the lois then the lois is lunar. All thickening things are lunar. The barri gull the kylila.", "logic": "\nScald(barri, lois)\nScald(barri, kylila)\nVilipend(barri, kylila)\nThickening(kathye)\nGull(kathye, kylila)\nLunar(lois)\nGull(lois, kathye)\nVilipend(kylila, kathye)\nnot Vilipend(kylila, lois)\nGull(kylila, lois)\nforall x (Gull(x, lois) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> Gull(x, barri))\nforall x (Vilipend(x, lois) and Thickening(x) -> Scald(lois, kylila))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> Thickening(x))\nnot Scald(barri, lois) -> Lunar(lois)\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Lunar(x))\n\nGull(barri, kylila)\n\nGull(barri, kylila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The maia lend the masha. The maia lend the jon. The maia roast the jon. The lorain is beholden. The lorain question the jon. The masha is mirrored. The masha question the lorain. The jon roast the lorain. The jon does not see the masha. The jon question the masha. If something question the masha then it is crescent. If something is crescent then it question the maia. If something roast the masha and it is beholden then the masha lend the jon. If something is crescent then it is beholden. If the maia does not chase the masha then the masha is mirrored. All beholden things are mirrored. The maia does not visit the lorain.", "logic": "\nLend(maia, masha)\nLend(maia, jon)\nRoast(maia, jon)\nBeholden(lorain)\nQuestion(lorain, jon)\nMirrored(masha)\nQuestion(masha, lorain)\nRoast(jon, lorain)\nnot Roast(jon, masha)\nQuestion(jon, masha)\nforall x (Question(x, masha) -> Crescent(x))\nforall x (Crescent(x) -> Question(x, maia))\nforall x (Roast(x, masha) and Beholden(x) -> Lend(masha, jon))\nforall x (Crescent(x) -> Beholden(x))\nnot Lend(maia, masha) -> Mirrored(masha)\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> Mirrored(x))\n\nnot Question(maia, lorain)\n\nnot Question(maia, lorain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The mace weaken the shalne. The mace weaken the sheelagh. The mace imperil the sheelagh. The zarla is motivative. The zarla terrace the sheelagh. The shalne is summative. The shalne terrace the zarla. The sheelagh imperil the zarla. The sheelagh does not see the shalne. The sheelagh terrace the shalne. If something terrace the shalne then it is seedy. If something is seedy then it terrace the mace. If something imperil the shalne and it is motivative then the shalne weaken the sheelagh. If something is seedy then it is motivative. If the mace does not chase the shalne then the shalne is summative. All motivative things are summative. The shalne imperil the zarla.", "logic": "\nWeaken(mace, shalne)\nWeaken(mace, sheelagh)\nImperil(mace, sheelagh)\nMotivative(zarla)\nTerrace(zarla, sheelagh)\nSummative(shalne)\nTerrace(shalne, zarla)\nImperil(sheelagh, zarla)\nnot Imperil(sheelagh, shalne)\nTerrace(sheelagh, shalne)\nforall x (Terrace(x, shalne) -> Seedy(x))\nforall x (Seedy(x) -> Terrace(x, mace))\nforall x (Imperil(x, shalne) and Motivative(x) -> Weaken(shalne, sheelagh))\nforall x (Seedy(x) -> Motivative(x))\nnot Weaken(mace, shalne) -> Summative(shalne)\nforall x (Motivative(x) -> Summative(x))\n\nImperil(shalne, zarla)\n\nImperil(shalne, zarla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "Russell is humpbacked. Enoch is connubial. Sukey is not platonic. Rex is bewildered. If someone is asyndetic then they are colonial. All humpbacked people are colonial. All colonial people are not squeaking. Green people are humpbacked. Red, asyndetic people are not humpbacked. If someone is asyndetic then they are humpbacked. Rex is bewildered.", "logic": "\nHumpbacked(russell)\nConnubial(enoch)\nnot Platonic(sukey)\nBewildered(rex)\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Colonial(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Colonial(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> not Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Bewildered(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) and Asyndetic(x) -> not Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\n\nBewildered(rex)\n\ntherefore Bewildered(rex)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Nan is christian. Sam is reactive. Lucilia is not levitical. Lynea is negroid. If someone is doable then they are pilose. All christian people are pilose. All pilose people are not ribbed. Green people are christian. Red, doable people are not christian. If someone is doable then they are christian. Lynea is not negroid.", "logic": "\nChristian(nan)\nReactive(sam)\nnot Levitical(lucilia)\nNegroid(lynea)\nforall x (Doable(x) -> Pilose(x))\nforall x (Christian(x) -> Pilose(x))\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> not Ribbed(x))\nforall x (Negroid(x) -> Christian(x))\nforall x (Pilose(x) and Doable(x) -> not Christian(x))\nforall x (Doable(x) -> Christian(x))\n\nnot Negroid(lynea)\n\ntherefore Negroid(lynea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Emmalee is shabby. Kenn is symbiotic. Sorcha is not convex. Audra is unseamed. If someone is leonine then they are statute. All shabby people are statute. All statute people are not inane. Green people are shabby. Red, leonine people are not shabby. If someone is leonine then they are shabby. Audra is shabby.", "logic": "\nShabby(emmalee)\nSymbiotic(kenn)\nnot Convex(sorcha)\nUnseamed(audra)\nforall x (Leonine(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Shabby(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Statute(x) -> not Inane(x))\nforall x (Unseamed(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Statute(x) and Leonine(x) -> not Shabby(x))\nforall x (Leonine(x) -> Shabby(x))\n\nShabby(audra)\n\nUnseamed(audra) and forall x (Unseamed(x) -> Shabby(x)) -> therefore Shabby(audra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Bogart is untipped. Kalvin is colourful. Simeon is not tendinous. Edin is straw. If someone is xxvi then they are repeatable. All untipped people are repeatable. All repeatable people are not flawed. Green people are untipped. Red, xxvi people are not untipped. If someone is xxvi then they are untipped. Bogart is not repeatable.", "logic": "\nUntipped(bogart)\nColourful(kalvin)\nnot Tendinous(simeon)\nStraw(edin)\nforall x (Xxvi(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Untipped(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) -> not Flawed(x))\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Untipped(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) and Xxvi(x) -> not Untipped(x))\nforall x (Xxvi(x) -> Untipped(x))\n\nnot Repeatable(bogart)\n\nUntipped(bogart) and forall x (Untipped(x) -> Repeatable(x)) -> therefore Repeatable(bogart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Frances is panicked. Quinn is stupefied. Karry is not overproud. Merwin is enclosed. If someone is thirdhand then they are downstair. All panicked people are downstair. All downstair people are not afrikaans. Green people are panicked. Red, thirdhand people are not panicked. If someone is thirdhand then they are panicked. Frances is not afrikaans.", "logic": "\nPanicked(frances)\nStupefied(quinn)\nnot Overproud(karry)\nEnclosed(merwin)\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) -> Downstair(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Downstair(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) -> not Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Enclosed(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Thirdhand(x) -> not Panicked(x))\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) -> Panicked(x))\n\nnot Afrikaans(frances)\n\nPanicked(frances) and forall x (Panicked(x) -> Downstair(x)) -> therefore Downstair(frances) Downstair(frances) and forall x (Downstair(x) -> not Afrikaans(x)) -> therefore not Afrikaans(frances)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Marina is galvanic. Benedicta is whiskered. Candis is not auctorial. Riannon is frozen. If someone is permeant then they are languorous. All galvanic people are languorous. All languorous people are not salaried. Green people are galvanic. Red, permeant people are not galvanic. If someone is permeant then they are galvanic. Marina is salaried.", "logic": "\nGalvanic(marina)\nWhiskered(benedicta)\nnot Auctorial(candis)\nFrozen(riannon)\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Languorous(x))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) -> Languorous(x))\nforall x (Languorous(x) -> not Salaried(x))\nforall x (Frozen(x) -> Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Languorous(x) and Permeant(x) -> not Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Galvanic(x))\n\nSalaried(marina)\n\nGalvanic(marina) and forall x (Galvanic(x) -> Languorous(x)) -> therefore Languorous(marina) Languorous(marina) and forall x (Languorous(x) -> not Salaried(x)) -> therefore not Salaried(marina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Althea is ghoulish. Emery is arrhythmic. Ania is not prior. Rufe is licensed. If someone is cadent then they are nativistic. All ghoulish people are nativistic. All nativistic people are not rending. Green people are ghoulish. Red, cadent people are not ghoulish. If someone is cadent then they are ghoulish. Rufe is not rending.", "logic": "\nGhoulish(althea)\nArrhythmic(emery)\nnot Prior(ania)\nLicensed(rufe)\nforall x (Cadent(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) -> not Rending(x))\nforall x (Licensed(x) -> Ghoulish(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Cadent(x) -> not Ghoulish(x))\nforall x (Cadent(x) -> Ghoulish(x))\n\nnot Rending(rufe)\n\nLicensed(rufe) and forall x (Licensed(x) -> Ghoulish(x)) -> therefore Ghoulish(rufe) Ghoulish(rufe) and forall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Nativistic(x)) -> therefore Nativistic(rufe) Nativistic(rufe) and forall x (Nativistic(x) -> not Rending(x)) -> therefore not Rending(rufe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Alanah is twilight. Cassandra is concealed. Matias is not amylaceous. Lenard is convivial. If someone is sugarless then they are moire. All twilight people are moire. All moire people are not cyclonal. Green people are twilight. Red, sugarless people are not twilight. If someone is sugarless then they are twilight. Lenard is cyclonal.", "logic": "\nTwilight(alanah)\nConcealed(cassandra)\nnot Amylaceous(matias)\nConvivial(lenard)\nforall x (Sugarless(x) -> Moire(x))\nforall x (Twilight(x) -> Moire(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) -> not Cyclonal(x))\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Twilight(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) and Sugarless(x) -> not Twilight(x))\nforall x (Sugarless(x) -> Twilight(x))\n\nCyclonal(lenard)\n\nConvivial(lenard) and forall x (Convivial(x) -> Twilight(x)) -> therefore Twilight(lenard) Twilight(lenard) and forall x (Twilight(x) -> Moire(x)) -> therefore Moire(lenard) Moire(lenard) and forall x (Moire(x) -> not Cyclonal(x)) -> therefore not Cyclonal(lenard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Truman is loveless. Kirbee is naked. Kaspar is not expectant. Molly is exogamic. If someone is vulgar then they are jocund. All loveless people are jocund. All jocund people are not piebald. Green people are loveless. Red, vulgar people are not loveless. If someone is vulgar then they are loveless. Kaspar is not jocund.", "logic": "\nLoveless(truman)\nNaked(kirbee)\nnot Expectant(kaspar)\nExogamic(molly)\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Loveless(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) -> not Piebald(x))\nforall x (Exogamic(x) -> Loveless(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) and Vulgar(x) -> not Loveless(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Loveless(x))\n\nnot Jocund(kaspar)\n\nforall x (Loveless(x) -> Jocund(x)) <- forall x (Exogamic(x) -> Loveless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Tessi is chaldee. Joye is faultless. Kial is not immense. Fan is acronymous. If someone is concordant then they are specified. All chaldee people are specified. All specified people are not soured. Green people are chaldee. Red, concordant people are not chaldee. If someone is concordant then they are chaldee. Joye is chaldee.", "logic": "\nChaldee(tessi)\nFaultless(joye)\nnot Immense(kial)\nAcronymous(fan)\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Specified(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Specified(x))\nforall x (Specified(x) -> not Soured(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Specified(x) and Concordant(x) -> not Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Chaldee(x))\n\nChaldee(joye)\n\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Chaldee(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Isabelle is fearless. Merrili is biggish. Jerri is not viselike. Cookie is sylphlike. If someone is refulgent then they are archetypal. All fearless people are archetypal. All archetypal people are not mortgaged. Green people are fearless. Red, refulgent people are not fearless. If someone is refulgent then they are fearless. Jerri is not fearless.", "logic": "\nFearless(isabelle)\nBiggish(merrili)\nnot Viselike(jerri)\nSylphlike(cookie)\nforall x (Refulgent(x) -> Archetypal(x))\nforall x (Fearless(x) -> Archetypal(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) -> not Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) -> Fearless(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and Refulgent(x) -> not Fearless(x))\nforall x (Refulgent(x) -> Fearless(x))\n\nnot Fearless(jerri)\n\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) -> Fearless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Celestine is suggestive. Christan is vendible. Purcell is not precise. Solomon is hourly. If someone is permed then they are tousled. All suggestive people are tousled. All tousled people are not paniculate. Green people are suggestive. Red, permed people are not suggestive. If someone is permed then they are suggestive. Christan is tousled.", "logic": "\nSuggestive(celestine)\nVendible(christan)\nnot Precise(purcell)\nHourly(solomon)\nforall x (Permed(x) -> Tousled(x))\nforall x (Suggestive(x) -> Tousled(x))\nforall x (Tousled(x) -> not Paniculate(x))\nforall x (Hourly(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Tousled(x) and Permed(x) -> not Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Permed(x) -> Suggestive(x))\n\nTousled(christan)\n\nforall x (Suggestive(x) -> Tousled(x)) <- forall x (Hourly(x) -> Suggestive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Cassandre is coccoid. Edward is occlusive. Claudia is not hebraic. Winnah is erythroid. If someone is appointive then they are groggy. All coccoid people are groggy. All groggy people are not sulphurous. Green people are coccoid. Red, appointive people are not coccoid. If someone is appointive then they are coccoid. Claudia is not appointive.", "logic": "\nCoccoid(cassandre)\nOcclusive(edward)\nnot Hebraic(claudia)\nErythroid(winnah)\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Groggy(x))\nforall x (Coccoid(x) -> Groggy(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) -> not Sulphurous(x))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) and Appointive(x) -> not Coccoid(x))\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Coccoid(x))\n\nnot Appointive(claudia)\n\nnot Appointive(claudia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Milena is mint. Karleen is simplified. Toinette is not priestly. Harlie is wysiwyg. If someone is handsome then they are septal. All mint people are septal. All septal people are not monogenic. Green people are mint. Red, handsome people are not mint. If someone is handsome then they are mint. Karleen is wysiwyg.", "logic": "\nMint(milena)\nSimplified(karleen)\nnot Priestly(toinette)\nWysiwyg(harlie)\nforall x (Handsome(x) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Mint(x) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) -> not Monogenic(x))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) -> Mint(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) and Handsome(x) -> not Mint(x))\nforall x (Handsome(x) -> Mint(x))\n\nWysiwyg(karleen)\n\nWysiwyg(karleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Mathilde is overseas. Maury is sissified. Belicia is not maledict. Blare is disjoint. If someone is bifacial then they are gandhian. All overseas people are gandhian. All gandhian people are not valid. Green people are overseas. Red, bifacial people are not overseas. If someone is bifacial then they are overseas. Mathilde is not maledict.", "logic": "\nOverseas(mathilde)\nSissified(maury)\nnot Maledict(belicia)\nDisjoint(blare)\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Gandhian(x))\nforall x (Overseas(x) -> Gandhian(x))\nforall x (Gandhian(x) -> not Valid(x))\nforall x (Disjoint(x) -> Overseas(x))\nforall x (Gandhian(x) and Bifacial(x) -> not Overseas(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Overseas(x))\n\nnot Maledict(mathilde)\n\nnot Maledict(mathilde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Mommy is racist. Janus is umbrageous. Gennie is not undraped. Frank is disposed. If someone is immodest then they are perturbing. All racist people are perturbing. All perturbing people are not marsupial. Green people are racist. Red, immodest people are not racist. If someone is immodest then they are racist. Frank is immodest.", "logic": "\nRacist(mommy)\nUmbrageous(janus)\nnot Undraped(gennie)\nDisposed(frank)\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nforall x (Racist(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) -> not Marsupial(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> Racist(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) and Immodest(x) -> not Racist(x))\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Racist(x))\n\nImmodest(frank)\n\nImmodest(frank) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Zalman is lithesome. Zalman is fooling. Dacey is fooling. All lithesome things are assailable. If something is groundless and fooling then it is assailable. Blue things are assailable. All fooling things are lithesome. If something is groundless then it is babyish. If something is lithesome then it is groundless. All fooling things are not neotenic. All lithesome things are not commercial. Zalman is fooling.", "logic": "\nLithesome(zalman)\nFooling(zalman)\nFooling(dacey)\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) and Fooling(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Fooling(x) -> Lithesome(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Babyish(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> Groundless(x))\nforall x (Fooling(x) -> not Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> not Commercial(x))\n\nFooling(zalman)\n\ntherefore Fooling(zalman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Jobyna is anopheline. Jobyna is concentric. Babs is concentric. All anopheline things are uneasy. If something is jesuitical and concentric then it is uneasy. Blue things are uneasy. All concentric things are anopheline. If something is jesuitical then it is unalloyed. If something is anopheline then it is jesuitical. All concentric things are not whorled. All anopheline things are not tensional. Jobyna is not concentric.", "logic": "\nAnopheline(jobyna)\nConcentric(jobyna)\nConcentric(babs)\nforall x (Anopheline(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) and Concentric(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Whorled(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> Anopheline(x))\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Anopheline(x) -> Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> not Whorled(x))\nforall x (Anopheline(x) -> not Tensional(x))\n\nnot Concentric(jobyna)\n\ntherefore Concentric(jobyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Ravi is proverbial. Ravi is local. Charita is local. All proverbial things are next. If something is solicitous and local then it is next. Blue things are next. All local things are proverbial. If something is solicitous then it is rigorous. If something is proverbial then it is solicitous. All local things are not blebbed. All proverbial things are not unsolved. Ravi is not blebbed.", "logic": "\nProverbial(ravi)\nLocal(ravi)\nLocal(charita)\nforall x (Proverbial(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Solicitous(x) and Local(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Blebbed(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Local(x) -> Proverbial(x))\nforall x (Solicitous(x) -> Rigorous(x))\nforall x (Proverbial(x) -> Solicitous(x))\nforall x (Local(x) -> not Blebbed(x))\nforall x (Proverbial(x) -> not Unsolved(x))\n\nnot Blebbed(ravi)\n\nLocal(ravi) and forall x (Local(x) -> not Blebbed(x)) -> therefore not Blebbed(ravi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Bard is aerobic. Bard is boeotian. Iormina is boeotian. All aerobic things are botonnee. If something is petalless and boeotian then it is botonnee. Blue things are botonnee. All boeotian things are aerobic. If something is petalless then it is entrenched. If something is aerobic then it is petalless. All boeotian things are not duncish. All aerobic things are not untapped. Iormina is not aerobic.", "logic": "\nAerobic(bard)\nBoeotian(bard)\nBoeotian(iormina)\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Botonnee(x))\nforall x (Petalless(x) and Boeotian(x) -> Botonnee(x))\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> Botonnee(x))\nforall x (Boeotian(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Petalless(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Petalless(x))\nforall x (Boeotian(x) -> not Duncish(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> not Untapped(x))\n\nnot Aerobic(iormina)\n\nBoeotian(iormina) and forall x (Boeotian(x) -> Aerobic(x)) -> therefore Aerobic(iormina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Archy is drumhead. Archy is soviet. Quint is soviet. All drumhead things are recognised. If something is celtic and soviet then it is recognised. Blue things are recognised. All soviet things are drumhead. If something is celtic then it is gaumless. If something is drumhead then it is celtic. All soviet things are not unratable. All drumhead things are not covered. Quint is recognised.", "logic": "\nDrumhead(archy)\nSoviet(archy)\nSoviet(quint)\nforall x (Drumhead(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Celtic(x) and Soviet(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Recognised(x))\nforall x (Soviet(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nforall x (Celtic(x) -> Gaumless(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) -> Celtic(x))\nforall x (Soviet(x) -> not Unratable(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) -> not Covered(x))\n\nRecognised(quint)\n\nSoviet(quint) and forall x (Soviet(x) -> Drumhead(x)) -> therefore Drumhead(quint) Drumhead(quint) and forall x (Drumhead(x) -> Recognised(x)) -> therefore Recognised(quint)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Darian is socialist. Darian is waking. Leela is waking. All socialist things are nonverbal. If something is dormie and waking then it is nonverbal. Blue things are nonverbal. All waking things are socialist. If something is dormie then it is right. If something is socialist then it is dormie. All waking things are not subaquatic. All socialist things are not unsanitary. Leela is not nonverbal.", "logic": "\nSocialist(darian)\nWaking(darian)\nWaking(leela)\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Dormie(x) and Waking(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Waking(x) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Dormie(x) -> Right(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Waking(x) -> not Subaquatic(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> not Unsanitary(x))\n\nnot Nonverbal(leela)\n\nWaking(leela) and forall x (Waking(x) -> Socialist(x)) -> therefore Socialist(leela) Socialist(leela) and forall x (Socialist(x) -> Nonverbal(x)) -> therefore Nonverbal(leela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Erika is familiar. Erika is abulic. Tabina is abulic. All familiar things are rimeless. If something is fragmental and abulic then it is rimeless. Blue things are rimeless. All abulic things are familiar. If something is fragmental then it is weakened. If something is familiar then it is fragmental. All abulic things are not slothful. All familiar things are not asymmetric. Tabina is weakened.", "logic": "\nFamiliar(erika)\nAbulic(erika)\nAbulic(tabina)\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and Abulic(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Slothful(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Abulic(x) -> Familiar(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) -> Weakened(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Abulic(x) -> not Slothful(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> not Asymmetric(x))\n\nWeakened(tabina)\n\nAbulic(tabina) and forall x (Abulic(x) -> Familiar(x)) -> therefore Familiar(tabina) Familiar(tabina) and forall x (Familiar(x) -> Fragmental(x)) -> therefore Fragmental(tabina) Fragmental(tabina) and forall x (Fragmental(x) -> Weakened(x)) -> therefore Weakened(tabina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Guendolen is iconic. Guendolen is nonracial. Vincent is nonracial. All iconic things are studious. If something is overstrung and nonracial then it is studious. Blue things are studious. All nonracial things are iconic. If something is overstrung then it is inactive. If something is iconic then it is overstrung. All nonracial things are not ablaze. All iconic things are not befogged. Vincent is not inactive.", "logic": "\nIconic(guendolen)\nNonracial(guendolen)\nNonracial(vincent)\nforall x (Iconic(x) -> Studious(x))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) and Nonracial(x) -> Studious(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Studious(x))\nforall x (Nonracial(x) -> Iconic(x))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Inactive(x))\nforall x (Iconic(x) -> Overstrung(x))\nforall x (Nonracial(x) -> not Ablaze(x))\nforall x (Iconic(x) -> not Befogged(x))\n\nnot Inactive(vincent)\n\nNonracial(vincent) and forall x (Nonracial(x) -> Iconic(x)) -> therefore Iconic(vincent) Iconic(vincent) and forall x (Iconic(x) -> Overstrung(x)) -> therefore Overstrung(vincent) Overstrung(vincent) and forall x (Overstrung(x) -> Inactive(x)) -> therefore Inactive(vincent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Caresa is prodromic. Caresa is sericeous. Caresa is sandaled. Caresa is brumal. Mona is prodromic. Mona is sloped. Mona is sericeous. Mona is sandaled. Maryellen is prodromic. Maryellen is sloped. Maryellen is brumal. Maryellen is billowy. All sericeous, sloped people are nonviscid. If someone is sericeous and nonviscid then they are billowy. Red people are sloped. Caresa is sandaled.", "logic": "\nProdromic(caresa)\nSericeous(caresa)\nSandaled(caresa)\nBrumal(caresa)\nProdromic(mona)\nSloped(mona)\nSericeous(mona)\nSandaled(mona)\nProdromic(maryellen)\nSloped(maryellen)\nBrumal(maryellen)\nBillowy(maryellen)\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Sloped(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Billowy(x))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) -> Sloped(x))\n\nSandaled(caresa)\n\ntherefore Sandaled(caresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Phineas is terefah. Phineas is motorless. Phineas is projected. Phineas is subversive. Leena is terefah. Leena is acid. Leena is motorless. Leena is projected. Gretchen is terefah. Gretchen is acid. Gretchen is subversive. Gretchen is gowned. All motorless, acid people are resinous. If someone is motorless and resinous then they are gowned. Red people are acid. Gretchen is not terefah.", "logic": "\nTerefah(phineas)\nMotorless(phineas)\nProjected(phineas)\nSubversive(phineas)\nTerefah(leena)\nAcid(leena)\nMotorless(leena)\nProjected(leena)\nTerefah(gretchen)\nAcid(gretchen)\nSubversive(gretchen)\nGowned(gretchen)\nforall x (Motorless(x) and Acid(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Motorless(x) and Resinous(x) -> Gowned(x))\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Acid(x))\n\nnot Terefah(gretchen)\n\ntherefore Terefah(gretchen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Oral is skewed. Oral is silken. Oral is felonious. Oral is tubelike. Colleen is skewed. Colleen is cervical. Colleen is silken. Colleen is felonious. Vick is skewed. Vick is cervical. Vick is tubelike. Vick is damnatory. All silken, cervical people are exoergic. If someone is silken and exoergic then they are damnatory. Red people are cervical. Colleen is exoergic.", "logic": "\nSkewed(oral)\nSilken(oral)\nFelonious(oral)\nTubelike(oral)\nSkewed(colleen)\nCervical(colleen)\nSilken(colleen)\nFelonious(colleen)\nSkewed(vick)\nCervical(vick)\nTubelike(vick)\nDamnatory(vick)\nforall x (Silken(x) and Cervical(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Silken(x) and Exoergic(x) -> Damnatory(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) -> Cervical(x))\n\nExoergic(colleen)\n\nSilken(colleen) and Cervical(colleen) and forall x (Silken(x) and Cervical(x) -> Exoergic(x)) -> therefore Exoergic(colleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Anatoly is unhewn. Anatoly is specked. Anatoly is multicolor. Anatoly is agamous. Carlina is unhewn. Carlina is fiddling. Carlina is specked. Carlina is multicolor. Leigh is unhewn. Leigh is fiddling. Leigh is agamous. Leigh is whipping. All specked, fiddling people are demoniacal. If someone is specked and demoniacal then they are whipping. Red people are fiddling. Anatoly is not fiddling.", "logic": "\nUnhewn(anatoly)\nSpecked(anatoly)\nMulticolor(anatoly)\nAgamous(anatoly)\nUnhewn(carlina)\nFiddling(carlina)\nSpecked(carlina)\nMulticolor(carlina)\nUnhewn(leigh)\nFiddling(leigh)\nAgamous(leigh)\nWhipping(leigh)\nforall x (Specked(x) and Fiddling(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Specked(x) and Demoniacal(x) -> Whipping(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> Fiddling(x))\n\nnot Fiddling(anatoly)\n\nMulticolor(anatoly) and forall x (Multicolor(x) -> Fiddling(x)) -> therefore Fiddling(anatoly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Martino is prussian. Martino is emblematic. Martino is nodulated. Martino is whacky. Goldina is prussian. Goldina is freaky. Goldina is emblematic. Goldina is nodulated. Malory is prussian. Malory is freaky. Malory is whacky. Malory is debasing. All emblematic, freaky people are abnaki. If someone is emblematic and abnaki then they are debasing. Red people are freaky. Goldina is debasing.", "logic": "\nPrussian(martino)\nEmblematic(martino)\nNodulated(martino)\nWhacky(martino)\nPrussian(goldina)\nFreaky(goldina)\nEmblematic(goldina)\nNodulated(goldina)\nPrussian(malory)\nFreaky(malory)\nWhacky(malory)\nDebasing(malory)\nforall x (Emblematic(x) and Freaky(x) -> Abnaki(x))\nforall x (Emblematic(x) and Abnaki(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Freaky(x))\n\nDebasing(goldina)\n\nEmblematic(goldina) and Freaky(goldina) and forall x (Emblematic(x) and Freaky(x) -> Abnaki(x)) -> therefore Abnaki(goldina) Emblematic(goldina) and Abnaki(goldina) and forall x (Emblematic(x) and Abnaki(x) -> Debasing(x)) -> therefore Debasing(goldina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Garvey is monogamous. Garvey is rampageous. Garvey is answerable. Garvey is spanking. Valli is monogamous. Valli is delicate. Valli is rampageous. Valli is answerable. Anissa is monogamous. Anissa is delicate. Anissa is spanking. Anissa is oxonian. All rampageous, delicate people are syphilitic. If someone is rampageous and syphilitic then they are oxonian. Red people are delicate. Valli is not oxonian.", "logic": "\nMonogamous(garvey)\nRampageous(garvey)\nAnswerable(garvey)\nSpanking(garvey)\nMonogamous(valli)\nDelicate(valli)\nRampageous(valli)\nAnswerable(valli)\nMonogamous(anissa)\nDelicate(anissa)\nSpanking(anissa)\nOxonian(anissa)\nforall x (Rampageous(x) and Delicate(x) -> Syphilitic(x))\nforall x (Rampageous(x) and Syphilitic(x) -> Oxonian(x))\nforall x (Answerable(x) -> Delicate(x))\n\nnot Oxonian(valli)\n\nRampageous(valli) and Delicate(valli) and forall x (Rampageous(x) and Delicate(x) -> Syphilitic(x)) -> therefore Syphilitic(valli) Rampageous(valli) and Syphilitic(valli) and forall x (Rampageous(x) and Syphilitic(x) -> Oxonian(x)) -> therefore Oxonian(valli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Quintana is creditable. Quintana is anginose. Quintana is bare. Quintana is gormless. Harvie is creditable. Harvie is apogamic. Harvie is anginose. Harvie is bare. Craig is creditable. Craig is apogamic. Craig is gormless. Craig is polytonal. All anginose, apogamic people are algebraic. If someone is anginose and algebraic then they are polytonal. Red people are apogamic. Quintana is polytonal.", "logic": "\nCreditable(quintana)\nAnginose(quintana)\nBare(quintana)\nGormless(quintana)\nCreditable(harvie)\nApogamic(harvie)\nAnginose(harvie)\nBare(harvie)\nCreditable(craig)\nApogamic(craig)\nGormless(craig)\nPolytonal(craig)\nforall x (Anginose(x) and Apogamic(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nforall x (Anginose(x) and Algebraic(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Bare(x) -> Apogamic(x))\n\nPolytonal(quintana)\n\nBare(quintana) and forall x (Bare(x) -> Apogamic(x)) -> therefore Apogamic(quintana) Anginose(quintana) and Apogamic(quintana) and forall x (Anginose(x) and Apogamic(x) -> Algebraic(x)) -> therefore Algebraic(quintana) Anginose(quintana) and Algebraic(quintana) and forall x (Anginose(x) and Algebraic(x) -> Polytonal(x)) -> therefore Polytonal(quintana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Kassey is centered. Kassey is ameboid. Kassey is echoic. Kassey is retractile. Marci is centered. Marci is egoistical. Marci is ameboid. Marci is echoic. Tova is centered. Tova is egoistical. Tova is retractile. Tova is piquant. All ameboid, egoistical people are monthlong. If someone is ameboid and monthlong then they are piquant. Red people are egoistical. Kassey is not piquant.", "logic": "\nCentered(kassey)\nAmeboid(kassey)\nEchoic(kassey)\nRetractile(kassey)\nCentered(marci)\nEgoistical(marci)\nAmeboid(marci)\nEchoic(marci)\nCentered(tova)\nEgoistical(tova)\nRetractile(tova)\nPiquant(tova)\nforall x (Ameboid(x) and Egoistical(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Ameboid(x) and Monthlong(x) -> Piquant(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) -> Egoistical(x))\n\nnot Piquant(kassey)\n\nEchoic(kassey) and forall x (Echoic(x) -> Egoistical(x)) -> therefore Egoistical(kassey) Ameboid(kassey) and Egoistical(kassey) and forall x (Ameboid(x) and Egoistical(x) -> Monthlong(x)) -> therefore Monthlong(kassey) Ameboid(kassey) and Monthlong(kassey) and forall x (Ameboid(x) and Monthlong(x) -> Piquant(x)) -> therefore Piquant(kassey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Maible is heraldic. Maible is dyspnoeic. Maible is spiderlike. Maible is agitative. Aleda is heraldic. Aleda is molar. Aleda is dyspnoeic. Aleda is spiderlike. Rolfe is heraldic. Rolfe is molar. Rolfe is agitative. Rolfe is chapfallen. All dyspnoeic, molar people are likely. If someone is dyspnoeic and likely then they are chapfallen. Red people are molar. Rolfe is not likely.", "logic": "\nHeraldic(maible)\nDyspnoeic(maible)\nSpiderlike(maible)\nAgitative(maible)\nHeraldic(aleda)\nMolar(aleda)\nDyspnoeic(aleda)\nSpiderlike(aleda)\nHeraldic(rolfe)\nMolar(rolfe)\nAgitative(rolfe)\nChapfallen(rolfe)\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and Molar(x) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and Likely(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\nforall x (Spiderlike(x) -> Molar(x))\n\nnot Likely(rolfe)\n\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and Molar(x) -> Likely(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Broddy is undraped. Broddy is front. Broddy is roseate. Broddy is infectious. Ailene is undraped. Ailene is fiducial. Ailene is front. Ailene is roseate. Dael is undraped. Dael is fiducial. Dael is infectious. Dael is arcane. All front, fiducial people are drowsy. If someone is front and drowsy then they are arcane. Red people are fiducial. Ailene is infectious.", "logic": "\nUndraped(broddy)\nFront(broddy)\nRoseate(broddy)\nInfectious(broddy)\nUndraped(ailene)\nFiducial(ailene)\nFront(ailene)\nRoseate(ailene)\nUndraped(dael)\nFiducial(dael)\nInfectious(dael)\nArcane(dael)\nforall x (Front(x) and Fiducial(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Front(x) and Drowsy(x) -> Arcane(x))\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> Fiducial(x))\n\nInfectious(ailene)\n\nInfectious(ailene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Shumeet is underwater. Shumeet is bondable. Shumeet is globose. Shumeet is woven. Paulo is underwater. Paulo is engorged. Paulo is bondable. Paulo is globose. Jacki is underwater. Jacki is engorged. Jacki is woven. Jacki is offended. All bondable, engorged people are pleasing. If someone is bondable and pleasing then they are offended. Red people are engorged. Jacki is not globose.", "logic": "\nUnderwater(shumeet)\nBondable(shumeet)\nGlobose(shumeet)\nWoven(shumeet)\nUnderwater(paulo)\nEngorged(paulo)\nBondable(paulo)\nGlobose(paulo)\nUnderwater(jacki)\nEngorged(jacki)\nWoven(jacki)\nOffended(jacki)\nforall x (Bondable(x) and Engorged(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Bondable(x) and Pleasing(x) -> Offended(x))\nforall x (Globose(x) -> Engorged(x))\n\nnot Globose(jacki)\n\nnot Globose(jacki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Vassili is humourless. Vassili is bared. Vassili is anatomical. Vassili is hanoverian. Alicea is humourless. Alicea is reposeful. Alicea is bared. Alicea is anatomical. Sparky is humourless. Sparky is reposeful. Sparky is hanoverian. Sparky is valent. All bared, reposeful people are banded. If someone is bared and banded then they are valent. Red people are reposeful. Sparky is bared.", "logic": "\nHumourless(vassili)\nBared(vassili)\nAnatomical(vassili)\nHanoverian(vassili)\nHumourless(alicea)\nReposeful(alicea)\nBared(alicea)\nAnatomical(alicea)\nHumourless(sparky)\nReposeful(sparky)\nHanoverian(sparky)\nValent(sparky)\nforall x (Bared(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Banded(x))\nforall x (Bared(x) and Banded(x) -> Valent(x))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Reposeful(x))\n\nBared(sparky)\n\nBared(sparky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The richard fissure the rudolf. The rudolf disparage the richard. The rudolf disparage the hamlin. The rudolf amnesty the richard. The rudolf amnesty the hamlin. The rudolf fissure the richard. The rudolf fissure the hamlin. The hamlin disparage the richard. The hamlin disparage the rudolf. The hamlin is vanished. The hamlin is shoeless. The hamlin amnesty the richard. The hamlin amnesty the rudolf. The hamlin fissure the richard. The hamlin fissure the rudolf. If someone disparage the rudolf then they chase the richard. If someone is revised then they like the richard. If someone disparage the rudolf and they are vanished then they like the richard. If someone fissure the richard and they are enumerable then the richard amnesty the hamlin. If someone amnesty the hamlin then they are enumerable. If someone amnesty the richard and they are vanished then the richard fissure the hamlin. The hamlin amnesty the rudolf.", "logic": "\nFissure(richard, rudolf)\nDisparage(rudolf, richard)\nDisparage(rudolf, hamlin)\nAmnesty(rudolf, richard)\nAmnesty(rudolf, hamlin)\nFissure(rudolf, richard)\nFissure(rudolf, hamlin)\nDisparage(hamlin, richard)\nDisparage(hamlin, rudolf)\nVanished(hamlin)\nShoeless(hamlin)\nAmnesty(hamlin, richard)\nAmnesty(hamlin, rudolf)\nFissure(hamlin, richard)\nFissure(hamlin, rudolf)\nforall x (Disparage(x, rudolf) -> Disparage(x, richard))\nforall x (Revised(x) -> Amnesty(x, richard))\nforall x (Disparage(x, rudolf) and Vanished(x) -> Amnesty(x, richard))\nforall x (Fissure(x, richard) and Enumerable(x) -> Amnesty(richard, hamlin))\nforall x (Amnesty(x, hamlin) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Amnesty(x, richard) and Vanished(x) -> Fissure(richard, hamlin))\n\nAmnesty(hamlin, rudolf)\n\ntherefore Amnesty(hamlin, rudolf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The prudence skyrocket the emmeline. The emmeline sate the prudence. The emmeline sate the cheslie. The emmeline honour the prudence. The emmeline honour the cheslie. The emmeline skyrocket the prudence. The emmeline skyrocket the cheslie. The cheslie sate the prudence. The cheslie sate the emmeline. The cheslie is orotund. The cheslie is uricosuric. The cheslie honour the prudence. The cheslie honour the emmeline. The cheslie skyrocket the prudence. The cheslie skyrocket the emmeline. If someone sate the emmeline then they chase the prudence. If someone is none then they like the prudence. If someone sate the emmeline and they are orotund then they like the prudence. If someone skyrocket the prudence and they are rotted then the prudence honour the cheslie. If someone honour the cheslie then they are rotted. If someone honour the prudence and they are orotund then the prudence skyrocket the cheslie. The emmeline does not need the cheslie.", "logic": "\nSkyrocket(prudence, emmeline)\nSate(emmeline, prudence)\nSate(emmeline, cheslie)\nHonour(emmeline, prudence)\nHonour(emmeline, cheslie)\nSkyrocket(emmeline, prudence)\nSkyrocket(emmeline, cheslie)\nSate(cheslie, prudence)\nSate(cheslie, emmeline)\nOrotund(cheslie)\nUricosuric(cheslie)\nHonour(cheslie, prudence)\nHonour(cheslie, emmeline)\nSkyrocket(cheslie, prudence)\nSkyrocket(cheslie, emmeline)\nforall x (Sate(x, emmeline) -> Sate(x, prudence))\nforall x (None(x) -> Honour(x, prudence))\nforall x (Sate(x, emmeline) and Orotund(x) -> Honour(x, prudence))\nforall x (Skyrocket(x, prudence) and Rotted(x) -> Honour(prudence, cheslie))\nforall x (Honour(x, cheslie) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Honour(x, prudence) and Orotund(x) -> Skyrocket(prudence, cheslie))\n\nnot Skyrocket(emmeline, cheslie)\n\ntherefore Skyrocket(emmeline, cheslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The broddy offsaddle the cookie. The cookie splosh the broddy. The cookie splosh the willey. The cookie skitter the broddy. The cookie skitter the willey. The cookie offsaddle the broddy. The cookie offsaddle the willey. The willey splosh the broddy. The willey splosh the cookie. The willey is aweless. The willey is executable. The willey skitter the broddy. The willey skitter the cookie. The willey offsaddle the broddy. The willey offsaddle the cookie. If someone splosh the cookie then they chase the broddy. If someone is pyemic then they like the broddy. If someone splosh the cookie and they are aweless then they like the broddy. If someone offsaddle the broddy and they are ageless then the broddy skitter the willey. If someone skitter the willey then they are ageless. If someone skitter the broddy and they are aweless then the broddy offsaddle the willey. The cookie is ageless.", "logic": "\nOffsaddle(broddy, cookie)\nSplosh(cookie, broddy)\nSplosh(cookie, willey)\nSkitter(cookie, broddy)\nSkitter(cookie, willey)\nOffsaddle(cookie, broddy)\nOffsaddle(cookie, willey)\nSplosh(willey, broddy)\nSplosh(willey, cookie)\nAweless(willey)\nExecutable(willey)\nSkitter(willey, broddy)\nSkitter(willey, cookie)\nOffsaddle(willey, broddy)\nOffsaddle(willey, cookie)\nforall x (Splosh(x, cookie) -> Splosh(x, broddy))\nforall x (Pyemic(x) -> Skitter(x, broddy))\nforall x (Splosh(x, cookie) and Aweless(x) -> Skitter(x, broddy))\nforall x (Offsaddle(x, broddy) and Ageless(x) -> Skitter(broddy, willey))\nforall x (Skitter(x, willey) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Skitter(x, broddy) and Aweless(x) -> Offsaddle(broddy, willey))\n\nAgeless(cookie)\n\nSkitter(cookie, willey) and forall x (Skitter(x, willey) -> Ageless(x)) -> therefore Ageless(cookie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The suzanna club the mabelle. The mabelle trudge the suzanna. The mabelle trudge the valene. The mabelle goggle the suzanna. The mabelle goggle the valene. The mabelle club the suzanna. The mabelle club the valene. The valene trudge the suzanna. The valene trudge the mabelle. The valene is hermitical. The valene is coequal. The valene goggle the suzanna. The valene goggle the mabelle. The valene club the suzanna. The valene club the mabelle. If someone trudge the mabelle then they chase the suzanna. If someone is opposing then they like the suzanna. If someone trudge the mabelle and they are hermitical then they like the suzanna. If someone club the suzanna and they are stained then the suzanna goggle the valene. If someone goggle the valene then they are stained. If someone goggle the suzanna and they are hermitical then the suzanna club the valene. The suzanna does not need the valene.", "logic": "\nClub(suzanna, mabelle)\nTrudge(mabelle, suzanna)\nTrudge(mabelle, valene)\nGoggle(mabelle, suzanna)\nGoggle(mabelle, valene)\nClub(mabelle, suzanna)\nClub(mabelle, valene)\nTrudge(valene, suzanna)\nTrudge(valene, mabelle)\nHermitical(valene)\nCoequal(valene)\nGoggle(valene, suzanna)\nGoggle(valene, mabelle)\nClub(valene, suzanna)\nClub(valene, mabelle)\nforall x (Trudge(x, mabelle) -> Trudge(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Opposing(x) -> Goggle(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Trudge(x, mabelle) and Hermitical(x) -> Goggle(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Club(x, suzanna) and Stained(x) -> Goggle(suzanna, valene))\nforall x (Goggle(x, valene) -> Stained(x))\nforall x (Goggle(x, suzanna) and Hermitical(x) -> Club(suzanna, valene))\n\nnot Club(suzanna, valene)\n\nGoggle(valene, suzanna) and Hermitical(valene) and forall x (Goggle(x, suzanna) and Hermitical(x) -> Club(suzanna, valene)) -> therefore Club(suzanna, valene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The bobby disembark the maureen. The maureen drip the bobby. The maureen drip the hyatt. The maureen effeminize the bobby. The maureen effeminize the hyatt. The maureen disembark the bobby. The maureen disembark the hyatt. The hyatt drip the bobby. The hyatt drip the maureen. The hyatt is condign. The hyatt is visored. The hyatt effeminize the bobby. The hyatt effeminize the maureen. The hyatt disembark the bobby. The hyatt disembark the maureen. If someone drip the maureen then they chase the bobby. If someone is nepalese then they like the bobby. If someone drip the maureen and they are condign then they like the bobby. If someone disembark the bobby and they are hobnailed then the bobby effeminize the hyatt. If someone effeminize the hyatt then they are hobnailed. If someone effeminize the bobby and they are condign then the bobby disembark the hyatt. The bobby effeminize the hyatt.", "logic": "\nDisembark(bobby, maureen)\nDrip(maureen, bobby)\nDrip(maureen, hyatt)\nEffeminize(maureen, bobby)\nEffeminize(maureen, hyatt)\nDisembark(maureen, bobby)\nDisembark(maureen, hyatt)\nDrip(hyatt, bobby)\nDrip(hyatt, maureen)\nCondign(hyatt)\nVisored(hyatt)\nEffeminize(hyatt, bobby)\nEffeminize(hyatt, maureen)\nDisembark(hyatt, bobby)\nDisembark(hyatt, maureen)\nforall x (Drip(x, maureen) -> Drip(x, bobby))\nforall x (Nepalese(x) -> Effeminize(x, bobby))\nforall x (Drip(x, maureen) and Condign(x) -> Effeminize(x, bobby))\nforall x (Disembark(x, bobby) and Hobnailed(x) -> Effeminize(bobby, hyatt))\nforall x (Effeminize(x, hyatt) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Effeminize(x, bobby) and Condign(x) -> Disembark(bobby, hyatt))\n\nEffeminize(bobby, hyatt)\n\nEffeminize(maureen, hyatt) and forall x (Effeminize(x, hyatt) -> Hobnailed(x)) -> therefore Hobnailed(maureen) Disembark(maureen, bobby) and Hobnailed(maureen) and forall x (Disembark(x, bobby) and Hobnailed(x) -> Effeminize(bobby, hyatt)) -> therefore Effeminize(bobby, hyatt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The effie meow the kaitlyn. The kaitlyn martyrise the effie. The kaitlyn martyrise the orelle. The kaitlyn distress the effie. The kaitlyn distress the orelle. The kaitlyn meow the effie. The kaitlyn meow the orelle. The orelle martyrise the effie. The orelle martyrise the kaitlyn. The orelle is scanty. The orelle is bossy. The orelle distress the effie. The orelle distress the kaitlyn. The orelle meow the effie. The orelle meow the kaitlyn. If someone martyrise the kaitlyn then they chase the effie. If someone is unplanted then they like the effie. If someone martyrise the kaitlyn and they are scanty then they like the effie. If someone meow the effie and they are deficient then the effie distress the orelle. If someone distress the orelle then they are deficient. If someone distress the effie and they are scanty then the effie meow the orelle. The effie does not like the orelle.", "logic": "\nMeow(effie, kaitlyn)\nMartyrise(kaitlyn, effie)\nMartyrise(kaitlyn, orelle)\nDistress(kaitlyn, effie)\nDistress(kaitlyn, orelle)\nMeow(kaitlyn, effie)\nMeow(kaitlyn, orelle)\nMartyrise(orelle, effie)\nMartyrise(orelle, kaitlyn)\nScanty(orelle)\nBossy(orelle)\nDistress(orelle, effie)\nDistress(orelle, kaitlyn)\nMeow(orelle, effie)\nMeow(orelle, kaitlyn)\nforall x (Martyrise(x, kaitlyn) -> Martyrise(x, effie))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> Distress(x, effie))\nforall x (Martyrise(x, kaitlyn) and Scanty(x) -> Distress(x, effie))\nforall x (Meow(x, effie) and Deficient(x) -> Distress(effie, orelle))\nforall x (Distress(x, orelle) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Distress(x, effie) and Scanty(x) -> Meow(effie, orelle))\n\nnot Distress(effie, orelle)\n\nDistress(kaitlyn, orelle) and forall x (Distress(x, orelle) -> Deficient(x)) -> therefore Deficient(kaitlyn) Meow(kaitlyn, effie) and Deficient(kaitlyn) and forall x (Meow(x, effie) and Deficient(x) -> Distress(effie, orelle)) -> therefore Distress(effie, orelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The maury wire the hewet. The hewet ramify the maury. The hewet ramify the kayla. The hewet yarn the maury. The hewet yarn the kayla. The hewet wire the maury. The hewet wire the kayla. The kayla ramify the maury. The kayla ramify the hewet. The kayla is dormie. The kayla is eventful. The kayla yarn the maury. The kayla yarn the hewet. The kayla wire the maury. The kayla wire the hewet. If someone ramify the hewet then they chase the maury. If someone is relentless then they like the maury. If someone ramify the hewet and they are dormie then they like the maury. If someone wire the maury and they are unexpected then the maury yarn the kayla. If someone yarn the kayla then they are unexpected. If someone yarn the maury and they are dormie then the maury wire the kayla. The maury is unexpected.", "logic": "\nWire(maury, hewet)\nRamify(hewet, maury)\nRamify(hewet, kayla)\nYarn(hewet, maury)\nYarn(hewet, kayla)\nWire(hewet, maury)\nWire(hewet, kayla)\nRamify(kayla, maury)\nRamify(kayla, hewet)\nDormie(kayla)\nEventful(kayla)\nYarn(kayla, maury)\nYarn(kayla, hewet)\nWire(kayla, maury)\nWire(kayla, hewet)\nforall x (Ramify(x, hewet) -> Ramify(x, maury))\nforall x (Relentless(x) -> Yarn(x, maury))\nforall x (Ramify(x, hewet) and Dormie(x) -> Yarn(x, maury))\nforall x (Wire(x, maury) and Unexpected(x) -> Yarn(maury, kayla))\nforall x (Yarn(x, kayla) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Yarn(x, maury) and Dormie(x) -> Wire(maury, kayla))\n\nUnexpected(maury)\n\nYarn(hewet, kayla) and forall x (Yarn(x, kayla) -> Unexpected(x)) -> therefore Unexpected(hewet) Wire(hewet, maury) and Unexpected(hewet) and forall x (Wire(x, maury) and Unexpected(x) -> Yarn(maury, kayla)) -> therefore Yarn(maury, kayla) Yarn(maury, kayla) and forall x (Yarn(x, kayla) -> Unexpected(x)) -> therefore Unexpected(maury)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The zorah tweet the debera. The debera addle the zorah. The debera addle the hank. The debera denote the zorah. The debera denote the hank. The debera tweet the zorah. The debera tweet the hank. The hank addle the zorah. The hank addle the debera. The hank is uppercase. The hank is overall. The hank denote the zorah. The hank denote the debera. The hank tweet the zorah. The hank tweet the debera. If someone addle the debera then they chase the zorah. If someone is bermudan then they like the zorah. If someone addle the debera and they are uppercase then they like the zorah. If someone tweet the zorah and they are sintered then the zorah denote the hank. If someone denote the hank then they are sintered. If someone denote the zorah and they are uppercase then the zorah tweet the hank. The zorah is not sintered.", "logic": "\nTweet(zorah, debera)\nAddle(debera, zorah)\nAddle(debera, hank)\nDenote(debera, zorah)\nDenote(debera, hank)\nTweet(debera, zorah)\nTweet(debera, hank)\nAddle(hank, zorah)\nAddle(hank, debera)\nUppercase(hank)\nOverall(hank)\nDenote(hank, zorah)\nDenote(hank, debera)\nTweet(hank, zorah)\nTweet(hank, debera)\nforall x (Addle(x, debera) -> Addle(x, zorah))\nforall x (Bermudan(x) -> Denote(x, zorah))\nforall x (Addle(x, debera) and Uppercase(x) -> Denote(x, zorah))\nforall x (Tweet(x, zorah) and Sintered(x) -> Denote(zorah, hank))\nforall x (Denote(x, hank) -> Sintered(x))\nforall x (Denote(x, zorah) and Uppercase(x) -> Tweet(zorah, hank))\n\nnot Sintered(zorah)\n\nDenote(debera, hank) and forall x (Denote(x, hank) -> Sintered(x)) -> therefore Sintered(debera) Tweet(debera, zorah) and Sintered(debera) and forall x (Tweet(x, zorah) and Sintered(x) -> Denote(zorah, hank)) -> therefore Denote(zorah, hank) Denote(zorah, hank) and forall x (Denote(x, hank) -> Sintered(x)) -> therefore Sintered(zorah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The nicolle seethe the adi. The adi salinate the nicolle. The adi salinate the conroy. The adi cradle the nicolle. The adi cradle the conroy. The adi seethe the nicolle. The adi seethe the conroy. The conroy salinate the nicolle. The conroy salinate the adi. The conroy is belarusian. The conroy is then. The conroy cradle the nicolle. The conroy cradle the adi. The conroy seethe the nicolle. The conroy seethe the adi. If someone salinate the adi then they chase the nicolle. If someone is unwooded then they like the nicolle. If someone salinate the adi and they are belarusian then they like the nicolle. If someone seethe the nicolle and they are deltoid then the nicolle cradle the conroy. If someone cradle the conroy then they are deltoid. If someone cradle the nicolle and they are belarusian then the nicolle seethe the conroy. The nicolle does not like the nicolle.", "logic": "\nSeethe(nicolle, adi)\nSalinate(adi, nicolle)\nSalinate(adi, conroy)\nCradle(adi, nicolle)\nCradle(adi, conroy)\nSeethe(adi, nicolle)\nSeethe(adi, conroy)\nSalinate(conroy, nicolle)\nSalinate(conroy, adi)\nBelarusian(conroy)\nThen(conroy)\nCradle(conroy, nicolle)\nCradle(conroy, adi)\nSeethe(conroy, nicolle)\nSeethe(conroy, adi)\nforall x (Salinate(x, adi) -> Salinate(x, nicolle))\nforall x (Unwooded(x) -> Cradle(x, nicolle))\nforall x (Salinate(x, adi) and Belarusian(x) -> Cradle(x, nicolle))\nforall x (Seethe(x, nicolle) and Deltoid(x) -> Cradle(nicolle, conroy))\nforall x (Cradle(x, conroy) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Cradle(x, nicolle) and Belarusian(x) -> Seethe(nicolle, conroy))\n\nnot Cradle(nicolle, nicolle)\n\nforall x (Unwooded(x) -> Cradle(x, nicolle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The orsola samba the shaine. The shaine sprout the orsola. The shaine sprout the wat. The shaine elapse the orsola. The shaine elapse the wat. The shaine samba the orsola. The shaine samba the wat. The wat sprout the orsola. The wat sprout the shaine. The wat is defendable. The wat is licensed. The wat elapse the orsola. The wat elapse the shaine. The wat samba the orsola. The wat samba the shaine. If someone sprout the shaine then they chase the orsola. If someone is unrealised then they like the orsola. If someone sprout the shaine and they are defendable then they like the orsola. If someone samba the orsola and they are raining then the orsola elapse the wat. If someone elapse the wat then they are raining. If someone elapse the orsola and they are defendable then the orsola samba the wat. The orsola sprout the orsola.", "logic": "\nSamba(orsola, shaine)\nSprout(shaine, orsola)\nSprout(shaine, wat)\nElapse(shaine, orsola)\nElapse(shaine, wat)\nSamba(shaine, orsola)\nSamba(shaine, wat)\nSprout(wat, orsola)\nSprout(wat, shaine)\nDefendable(wat)\nLicensed(wat)\nElapse(wat, orsola)\nElapse(wat, shaine)\nSamba(wat, orsola)\nSamba(wat, shaine)\nforall x (Sprout(x, shaine) -> Sprout(x, orsola))\nforall x (Unrealised(x) -> Elapse(x, orsola))\nforall x (Sprout(x, shaine) and Defendable(x) -> Elapse(x, orsola))\nforall x (Samba(x, orsola) and Raining(x) -> Elapse(orsola, wat))\nforall x (Elapse(x, wat) -> Raining(x))\nforall x (Elapse(x, orsola) and Defendable(x) -> Samba(orsola, wat))\n\nSprout(orsola, orsola)\n\nforall x (Sprout(x, shaine) -> Sprout(x, orsola)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The filide rebate the odille. The odille panhandle the filide. The odille panhandle the dorise. The odille talc the filide. The odille talc the dorise. The odille rebate the filide. The odille rebate the dorise. The dorise panhandle the filide. The dorise panhandle the odille. The dorise is younger. The dorise is bullying. The dorise talc the filide. The dorise talc the odille. The dorise rebate the filide. The dorise rebate the odille. If someone panhandle the odille then they chase the filide. If someone is songful then they like the filide. If someone panhandle the odille and they are younger then they like the filide. If someone rebate the filide and they are quantized then the filide talc the dorise. If someone talc the dorise then they are quantized. If someone talc the filide and they are younger then the filide rebate the dorise. The dorise is not quantized.", "logic": "\nRebate(filide, odille)\nPanhandle(odille, filide)\nPanhandle(odille, dorise)\nTalc(odille, filide)\nTalc(odille, dorise)\nRebate(odille, filide)\nRebate(odille, dorise)\nPanhandle(dorise, filide)\nPanhandle(dorise, odille)\nYounger(dorise)\nBullying(dorise)\nTalc(dorise, filide)\nTalc(dorise, odille)\nRebate(dorise, filide)\nRebate(dorise, odille)\nforall x (Panhandle(x, odille) -> Panhandle(x, filide))\nforall x (Songful(x) -> Talc(x, filide))\nforall x (Panhandle(x, odille) and Younger(x) -> Talc(x, filide))\nforall x (Rebate(x, filide) and Quantized(x) -> Talc(filide, dorise))\nforall x (Talc(x, dorise) -> Quantized(x))\nforall x (Talc(x, filide) and Younger(x) -> Rebate(filide, dorise))\n\nnot Quantized(dorise)\n\nforall x (Talc(x, dorise) -> Quantized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The deidre denigrate the wes. The wes gimp the deidre. The wes gimp the esmaria. The wes gird the deidre. The wes gird the esmaria. The wes denigrate the deidre. The wes denigrate the esmaria. The esmaria gimp the deidre. The esmaria gimp the wes. The esmaria is limpid. The esmaria is mulish. The esmaria gird the deidre. The esmaria gird the wes. The esmaria denigrate the deidre. The esmaria denigrate the wes. If someone gimp the wes then they chase the deidre. If someone is sugared then they like the deidre. If someone gimp the wes and they are limpid then they like the deidre. If someone denigrate the deidre and they are useable then the deidre gird the esmaria. If someone gird the esmaria then they are useable. If someone gird the deidre and they are limpid then the deidre denigrate the esmaria. The wes is limpid.", "logic": "\nDenigrate(deidre, wes)\nGimp(wes, deidre)\nGimp(wes, esmaria)\nGird(wes, deidre)\nGird(wes, esmaria)\nDenigrate(wes, deidre)\nDenigrate(wes, esmaria)\nGimp(esmaria, deidre)\nGimp(esmaria, wes)\nLimpid(esmaria)\nMulish(esmaria)\nGird(esmaria, deidre)\nGird(esmaria, wes)\nDenigrate(esmaria, deidre)\nDenigrate(esmaria, wes)\nforall x (Gimp(x, wes) -> Gimp(x, deidre))\nforall x (Sugared(x) -> Gird(x, deidre))\nforall x (Gimp(x, wes) and Limpid(x) -> Gird(x, deidre))\nforall x (Denigrate(x, deidre) and Useable(x) -> Gird(deidre, esmaria))\nforall x (Gird(x, esmaria) -> Useable(x))\nforall x (Gird(x, deidre) and Limpid(x) -> Denigrate(deidre, esmaria))\n\nLimpid(wes)\n\nLimpid(wes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The sharlene reseat the trev. The trev kotow the sharlene. The trev kotow the franklyn. The trev coddle the sharlene. The trev coddle the franklyn. The trev reseat the sharlene. The trev reseat the franklyn. The franklyn kotow the sharlene. The franklyn kotow the trev. The franklyn is infective. The franklyn is drafty. The franklyn coddle the sharlene. The franklyn coddle the trev. The franklyn reseat the sharlene. The franklyn reseat the trev. If someone kotow the trev then they chase the sharlene. If someone is moroccan then they like the sharlene. If someone kotow the trev and they are infective then they like the sharlene. If someone reseat the sharlene and they are molal then the sharlene coddle the franklyn. If someone coddle the franklyn then they are molal. If someone coddle the sharlene and they are infective then the sharlene reseat the franklyn. The franklyn is not green.", "logic": "\nReseat(sharlene, trev)\nKotow(trev, sharlene)\nKotow(trev, franklyn)\nCoddle(trev, sharlene)\nCoddle(trev, franklyn)\nReseat(trev, sharlene)\nReseat(trev, franklyn)\nKotow(franklyn, sharlene)\nKotow(franklyn, trev)\nInfective(franklyn)\nDrafty(franklyn)\nCoddle(franklyn, sharlene)\nCoddle(franklyn, trev)\nReseat(franklyn, sharlene)\nReseat(franklyn, trev)\nforall x (Kotow(x, trev) -> Kotow(x, sharlene))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Coddle(x, sharlene))\nforall x (Kotow(x, trev) and Infective(x) -> Coddle(x, sharlene))\nforall x (Reseat(x, sharlene) and Molal(x) -> Coddle(sharlene, franklyn))\nforall x (Coddle(x, franklyn) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Coddle(x, sharlene) and Infective(x) -> Reseat(sharlene, franklyn))\n\nnot Green(franklyn)\n\nnot Green(franklyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The donielle foreshow the brigitte. The brigitte reshape the donielle. The brigitte reshape the leonard. The brigitte quadruple the donielle. The brigitte quadruple the leonard. The brigitte foreshow the donielle. The brigitte foreshow the leonard. The leonard reshape the donielle. The leonard reshape the brigitte. The leonard is puppylike. The leonard is english. The leonard quadruple the donielle. The leonard quadruple the brigitte. The leonard foreshow the donielle. The leonard foreshow the brigitte. If someone reshape the brigitte then they chase the donielle. If someone is viscous then they like the donielle. If someone reshape the brigitte and they are puppylike then they like the donielle. If someone foreshow the donielle and they are enmeshed then the donielle quadruple the leonard. If someone quadruple the leonard then they are enmeshed. If someone quadruple the donielle and they are puppylike then the donielle foreshow the leonard. The donielle is green.", "logic": "\nForeshow(donielle, brigitte)\nReshape(brigitte, donielle)\nReshape(brigitte, leonard)\nQuadruple(brigitte, donielle)\nQuadruple(brigitte, leonard)\nForeshow(brigitte, donielle)\nForeshow(brigitte, leonard)\nReshape(leonard, donielle)\nReshape(leonard, brigitte)\nPuppylike(leonard)\nEnglish(leonard)\nQuadruple(leonard, donielle)\nQuadruple(leonard, brigitte)\nForeshow(leonard, donielle)\nForeshow(leonard, brigitte)\nforall x (Reshape(x, brigitte) -> Reshape(x, donielle))\nforall x (Viscous(x) -> Quadruple(x, donielle))\nforall x (Reshape(x, brigitte) and Puppylike(x) -> Quadruple(x, donielle))\nforall x (Foreshow(x, donielle) and Enmeshed(x) -> Quadruple(donielle, leonard))\nforall x (Quadruple(x, leonard) -> Enmeshed(x))\nforall x (Quadruple(x, donielle) and Puppylike(x) -> Foreshow(donielle, leonard))\n\nGreen(donielle)\n\nGreen(donielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The kordula radiate the karylin. The karylin trigger the kordula. The karylin trigger the dorit. The karylin tell the kordula. The karylin tell the dorit. The karylin radiate the kordula. The karylin radiate the dorit. The dorit trigger the kordula. The dorit trigger the karylin. The dorit is manichee. The dorit is easy. The dorit tell the kordula. The dorit tell the karylin. The dorit radiate the kordula. The dorit radiate the karylin. If someone trigger the karylin then they chase the kordula. If someone is fathomable then they like the kordula. If someone trigger the karylin and they are manichee then they like the kordula. If someone radiate the kordula and they are vestmented then the kordula tell the dorit. If someone tell the dorit then they are vestmented. If someone tell the kordula and they are manichee then the kordula radiate the dorit. The karylin does not chase the karylin.", "logic": "\nRadiate(kordula, karylin)\nTrigger(karylin, kordula)\nTrigger(karylin, dorit)\nTell(karylin, kordula)\nTell(karylin, dorit)\nRadiate(karylin, kordula)\nRadiate(karylin, dorit)\nTrigger(dorit, kordula)\nTrigger(dorit, karylin)\nManichee(dorit)\nEasy(dorit)\nTell(dorit, kordula)\nTell(dorit, karylin)\nRadiate(dorit, kordula)\nRadiate(dorit, karylin)\nforall x (Trigger(x, karylin) -> Trigger(x, kordula))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Tell(x, kordula))\nforall x (Trigger(x, karylin) and Manichee(x) -> Tell(x, kordula))\nforall x (Radiate(x, kordula) and Vestmented(x) -> Tell(kordula, dorit))\nforall x (Tell(x, dorit) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Tell(x, kordula) and Manichee(x) -> Radiate(kordula, dorit))\n\nnot Trigger(karylin, karylin)\n\nnot Trigger(karylin, karylin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The rhianna intrench the osgood. The osgood rain the rhianna. The osgood rain the dawn. The osgood streamline the rhianna. The osgood streamline the dawn. The osgood intrench the rhianna. The osgood intrench the dawn. The dawn rain the rhianna. The dawn rain the osgood. The dawn is mythic. The dawn is nigerien. The dawn streamline the rhianna. The dawn streamline the osgood. The dawn intrench the rhianna. The dawn intrench the osgood. If someone rain the osgood then they chase the rhianna. If someone is proved then they like the rhianna. If someone rain the osgood and they are mythic then they like the rhianna. If someone intrench the rhianna and they are lowering then the rhianna streamline the dawn. If someone streamline the dawn then they are lowering. If someone streamline the rhianna and they are mythic then the rhianna intrench the dawn. The dawn rain the dawn.", "logic": "\nIntrench(rhianna, osgood)\nRain(osgood, rhianna)\nRain(osgood, dawn)\nStreamline(osgood, rhianna)\nStreamline(osgood, dawn)\nIntrench(osgood, rhianna)\nIntrench(osgood, dawn)\nRain(dawn, rhianna)\nRain(dawn, osgood)\nMythic(dawn)\nNigerien(dawn)\nStreamline(dawn, rhianna)\nStreamline(dawn, osgood)\nIntrench(dawn, rhianna)\nIntrench(dawn, osgood)\nforall x (Rain(x, osgood) -> Rain(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Proved(x) -> Streamline(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Rain(x, osgood) and Mythic(x) -> Streamline(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Intrench(x, rhianna) and Lowering(x) -> Streamline(rhianna, dawn))\nforall x (Streamline(x, dawn) -> Lowering(x))\nforall x (Streamline(x, rhianna) and Mythic(x) -> Intrench(rhianna, dawn))\n\nRain(dawn, dawn)\n\nRain(dawn, dawn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "Gus is stony. Karoline is unabated. Karoline is pervasive. Karoline is cloaked. Karoline is opulent. Chelsae is unabated. Chelsae is stony. Chelsae is every. Chelsae is pervasive. Chelsae is cloaked. Chelsae is excrescent. Chelsae is opulent. Eduard is unabated. Eduard is every. Eduard is opulent. If Chelsae is excrescent then Chelsae is opulent. If Eduard is opulent then Eduard is every. All cloaked, unabated things are every. All pervasive things are excrescent. All pervasive, opulent things are excrescent. Rough, opulent things are pervasive. If something is unabated then it is cloaked. If Chelsae is opulent and Chelsae is pervasive then Chelsae is unabated. Chelsae is pervasive.", "logic": "\nStony(gus)\nUnabated(karoline)\nPervasive(karoline)\nCloaked(karoline)\nOpulent(karoline)\nUnabated(chelsae)\nStony(chelsae)\nEvery(chelsae)\nPervasive(chelsae)\nCloaked(chelsae)\nExcrescent(chelsae)\nOpulent(chelsae)\nUnabated(eduard)\nEvery(eduard)\nOpulent(eduard)\nExcrescent(chelsae) -> Opulent(chelsae)\nOpulent(eduard) -> Every(eduard)\nforall x (Cloaked(x) and Unabated(x) -> Every(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) -> Excrescent(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and Opulent(x) -> Excrescent(x))\nforall x (Cloaked(x) and Opulent(x) -> Pervasive(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> Cloaked(x))\nOpulent(chelsae) and Pervasive(chelsae) -> Unabated(chelsae)\n\nPervasive(chelsae)\n\ntherefore Pervasive(chelsae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Daisey is overfond. Rob is harsh. Rob is comburant. Rob is adipose. Rob is winsome. Eyde is harsh. Eyde is overfond. Eyde is advertised. Eyde is comburant. Eyde is adipose. Eyde is brunet. Eyde is winsome. Stillmann is harsh. Stillmann is advertised. Stillmann is winsome. If Eyde is brunet then Eyde is winsome. If Stillmann is winsome then Stillmann is advertised. All adipose, harsh things are advertised. All comburant things are brunet. All comburant, winsome things are brunet. Rough, winsome things are comburant. If something is harsh then it is adipose. If Eyde is winsome and Eyde is comburant then Eyde is harsh. Stillmann is not harsh.", "logic": "\nOverfond(daisey)\nHarsh(rob)\nComburant(rob)\nAdipose(rob)\nWinsome(rob)\nHarsh(eyde)\nOverfond(eyde)\nAdvertised(eyde)\nComburant(eyde)\nAdipose(eyde)\nBrunet(eyde)\nWinsome(eyde)\nHarsh(stillmann)\nAdvertised(stillmann)\nWinsome(stillmann)\nBrunet(eyde) -> Winsome(eyde)\nWinsome(stillmann) -> Advertised(stillmann)\nforall x (Adipose(x) and Harsh(x) -> Advertised(x))\nforall x (Comburant(x) -> Brunet(x))\nforall x (Comburant(x) and Winsome(x) -> Brunet(x))\nforall x (Adipose(x) and Winsome(x) -> Comburant(x))\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Adipose(x))\nWinsome(eyde) and Comburant(eyde) -> Harsh(eyde)\n\nnot Harsh(stillmann)\n\ntherefore Harsh(stillmann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Heinrich is auric. Udell is grotty. Udell is fulminant. Udell is overactive. Udell is unsymbolic. Sayres is grotty. Sayres is auric. Sayres is gushy. Sayres is fulminant. Sayres is overactive. Sayres is tight. Sayres is unsymbolic. Dixie is grotty. Dixie is gushy. Dixie is unsymbolic. If Sayres is tight then Sayres is unsymbolic. If Dixie is unsymbolic then Dixie is gushy. All overactive, grotty things are gushy. All fulminant things are tight. All fulminant, unsymbolic things are tight. Rough, unsymbolic things are fulminant. If something is grotty then it is overactive. If Sayres is unsymbolic and Sayres is fulminant then Sayres is grotty. Udell is tight.", "logic": "\nAuric(heinrich)\nGrotty(udell)\nFulminant(udell)\nOveractive(udell)\nUnsymbolic(udell)\nGrotty(sayres)\nAuric(sayres)\nGushy(sayres)\nFulminant(sayres)\nOveractive(sayres)\nTight(sayres)\nUnsymbolic(sayres)\nGrotty(dixie)\nGushy(dixie)\nUnsymbolic(dixie)\nTight(sayres) -> Unsymbolic(sayres)\nUnsymbolic(dixie) -> Gushy(dixie)\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Grotty(x) -> Gushy(x))\nforall x (Fulminant(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Fulminant(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Fulminant(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Overactive(x))\nUnsymbolic(sayres) and Fulminant(sayres) -> Grotty(sayres)\n\nTight(udell)\n\nFulminant(udell) and forall x (Fulminant(x) -> Tight(x)) -> therefore Tight(udell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Sheffield is epitheliod. Hillard is abounding. Hillard is mistreated. Hillard is capable. Hillard is spangly. Margeaux is abounding. Margeaux is epitheliod. Margeaux is token. Margeaux is mistreated. Margeaux is capable. Margeaux is luckless. Margeaux is spangly. Fred is abounding. Fred is token. Fred is spangly. If Margeaux is luckless then Margeaux is spangly. If Fred is spangly then Fred is token. All capable, abounding things are token. All mistreated things are luckless. All mistreated, spangly things are luckless. Rough, spangly things are mistreated. If something is abounding then it is capable. If Margeaux is spangly and Margeaux is mistreated then Margeaux is abounding. Hillard is not luckless.", "logic": "\nEpitheliod(sheffield)\nAbounding(hillard)\nMistreated(hillard)\nCapable(hillard)\nSpangly(hillard)\nAbounding(margeaux)\nEpitheliod(margeaux)\nToken(margeaux)\nMistreated(margeaux)\nCapable(margeaux)\nLuckless(margeaux)\nSpangly(margeaux)\nAbounding(fred)\nToken(fred)\nSpangly(fred)\nLuckless(margeaux) -> Spangly(margeaux)\nSpangly(fred) -> Token(fred)\nforall x (Capable(x) and Abounding(x) -> Token(x))\nforall x (Mistreated(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Mistreated(x) and Spangly(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and Spangly(x) -> Mistreated(x))\nforall x (Abounding(x) -> Capable(x))\nSpangly(margeaux) and Mistreated(margeaux) -> Abounding(margeaux)\n\nnot Luckless(hillard)\n\nMistreated(hillard) and forall x (Mistreated(x) -> Luckless(x)) -> therefore Luckless(hillard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Tina is scary. Efram is orthoptic. Efram is blinded. Efram is acned. Efram is wasted. Vanessa is orthoptic. Vanessa is scary. Vanessa is prenominal. Vanessa is blinded. Vanessa is acned. Vanessa is emended. Vanessa is wasted. Marcile is orthoptic. Marcile is prenominal. Marcile is wasted. If Vanessa is emended then Vanessa is wasted. If Marcile is wasted then Marcile is prenominal. All acned, orthoptic things are prenominal. All blinded things are emended. All blinded, wasted things are emended. Rough, wasted things are blinded. If something is orthoptic then it is acned. If Vanessa is wasted and Vanessa is blinded then Vanessa is orthoptic. Marcile is blinded.", "logic": "\nScary(tina)\nOrthoptic(efram)\nBlinded(efram)\nAcned(efram)\nWasted(efram)\nOrthoptic(vanessa)\nScary(vanessa)\nPrenominal(vanessa)\nBlinded(vanessa)\nAcned(vanessa)\nEmended(vanessa)\nWasted(vanessa)\nOrthoptic(marcile)\nPrenominal(marcile)\nWasted(marcile)\nEmended(vanessa) -> Wasted(vanessa)\nWasted(marcile) -> Prenominal(marcile)\nforall x (Acned(x) and Orthoptic(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Blinded(x) and Wasted(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Acned(x) and Wasted(x) -> Blinded(x))\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) -> Acned(x))\nWasted(vanessa) and Blinded(vanessa) -> Orthoptic(vanessa)\n\nBlinded(marcile)\n\nOrthoptic(marcile) and forall x (Orthoptic(x) -> Acned(x)) -> therefore Acned(marcile) Acned(marcile) and Wasted(marcile) and forall x (Acned(x) and Wasted(x) -> Blinded(x)) -> therefore Blinded(marcile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Koren is overturned. Ania is unrouged. Ania is cankerous. Ania is intestate. Ania is derelict. Alyss is unrouged. Alyss is overturned. Alyss is fourscore. Alyss is cankerous. Alyss is intestate. Alyss is submarine. Alyss is derelict. Skippy is unrouged. Skippy is fourscore. Skippy is derelict. If Alyss is submarine then Alyss is derelict. If Skippy is derelict then Skippy is fourscore. All intestate, unrouged things are fourscore. All cankerous things are submarine. All cankerous, derelict things are submarine. Rough, derelict things are cankerous. If something is unrouged then it is intestate. If Alyss is derelict and Alyss is cankerous then Alyss is unrouged. Skippy is not cankerous.", "logic": "\nOverturned(koren)\nUnrouged(ania)\nCankerous(ania)\nIntestate(ania)\nDerelict(ania)\nUnrouged(alyss)\nOverturned(alyss)\nFourscore(alyss)\nCankerous(alyss)\nIntestate(alyss)\nSubmarine(alyss)\nDerelict(alyss)\nUnrouged(skippy)\nFourscore(skippy)\nDerelict(skippy)\nSubmarine(alyss) -> Derelict(alyss)\nDerelict(skippy) -> Fourscore(skippy)\nforall x (Intestate(x) and Unrouged(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Cankerous(x) -> Submarine(x))\nforall x (Cankerous(x) and Derelict(x) -> Submarine(x))\nforall x (Intestate(x) and Derelict(x) -> Cankerous(x))\nforall x (Unrouged(x) -> Intestate(x))\nDerelict(alyss) and Cankerous(alyss) -> Unrouged(alyss)\n\nnot Cankerous(skippy)\n\nUnrouged(skippy) and forall x (Unrouged(x) -> Intestate(x)) -> therefore Intestate(skippy) Intestate(skippy) and Derelict(skippy) and forall x (Intestate(x) and Derelict(x) -> Cankerous(x)) -> therefore Cankerous(skippy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Barbette is metal. Trent is enforced. Trent is regardful. Trent is barehanded. Trent is nontoxic. Armand is enforced. Armand is metal. Armand is crannied. Armand is regardful. Armand is barehanded. Armand is modular. Armand is nontoxic. Gipsy is enforced. Gipsy is crannied. Gipsy is nontoxic. If Armand is modular then Armand is nontoxic. If Gipsy is nontoxic then Gipsy is crannied. All barehanded, enforced things are crannied. All regardful things are modular. All regardful, nontoxic things are modular. Rough, nontoxic things are regardful. If something is enforced then it is barehanded. If Armand is nontoxic and Armand is regardful then Armand is enforced. Gipsy is modular.", "logic": "\nMetal(barbette)\nEnforced(trent)\nRegardful(trent)\nBarehanded(trent)\nNontoxic(trent)\nEnforced(armand)\nMetal(armand)\nCrannied(armand)\nRegardful(armand)\nBarehanded(armand)\nModular(armand)\nNontoxic(armand)\nEnforced(gipsy)\nCrannied(gipsy)\nNontoxic(gipsy)\nModular(armand) -> Nontoxic(armand)\nNontoxic(gipsy) -> Crannied(gipsy)\nforall x (Barehanded(x) and Enforced(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Regardful(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Regardful(x) and Nontoxic(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Barehanded(x) and Nontoxic(x) -> Regardful(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nNontoxic(armand) and Regardful(armand) -> Enforced(armand)\n\nModular(gipsy)\n\nEnforced(gipsy) and forall x (Enforced(x) -> Barehanded(x)) -> therefore Barehanded(gipsy) Barehanded(gipsy) and Nontoxic(gipsy) and forall x (Barehanded(x) and Nontoxic(x) -> Regardful(x)) -> therefore Regardful(gipsy) Regardful(gipsy) and forall x (Regardful(x) -> Modular(x)) -> therefore Modular(gipsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Tymon is heritable. Obie is intruding. Obie is super. Obie is vinegarish. Obie is appealable. Richy is intruding. Richy is heritable. Richy is nonvisual. Richy is super. Richy is vinegarish. Richy is ignored. Richy is appealable. Winni is intruding. Winni is nonvisual. Winni is appealable. If Richy is ignored then Richy is appealable. If Winni is appealable then Winni is nonvisual. All vinegarish, intruding things are nonvisual. All super things are ignored. All super, appealable things are ignored. Rough, appealable things are super. If something is intruding then it is vinegarish. If Richy is appealable and Richy is super then Richy is intruding. Winni is not ignored.", "logic": "\nHeritable(tymon)\nIntruding(obie)\nSuper(obie)\nVinegarish(obie)\nAppealable(obie)\nIntruding(richy)\nHeritable(richy)\nNonvisual(richy)\nSuper(richy)\nVinegarish(richy)\nIgnored(richy)\nAppealable(richy)\nIntruding(winni)\nNonvisual(winni)\nAppealable(winni)\nIgnored(richy) -> Appealable(richy)\nAppealable(winni) -> Nonvisual(winni)\nforall x (Vinegarish(x) and Intruding(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\nforall x (Super(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Super(x) and Appealable(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Vinegarish(x) and Appealable(x) -> Super(x))\nforall x (Intruding(x) -> Vinegarish(x))\nAppealable(richy) and Super(richy) -> Intruding(richy)\n\nnot Ignored(winni)\n\nIntruding(winni) and forall x (Intruding(x) -> Vinegarish(x)) -> therefore Vinegarish(winni) Vinegarish(winni) and Appealable(winni) and forall x (Vinegarish(x) and Appealable(x) -> Super(x)) -> therefore Super(winni) Super(winni) and forall x (Super(x) -> Ignored(x)) -> therefore Ignored(winni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Heda is diseased. Kathye is unsexy. Kathye is delinquent. Kathye is ovate. Kathye is susurrous. Ricki is unsexy. Ricki is diseased. Ricki is busy. Ricki is delinquent. Ricki is ovate. Ricki is surprised. Ricki is susurrous. Renee is unsexy. Renee is busy. Renee is susurrous. If Ricki is surprised then Ricki is susurrous. If Renee is susurrous then Renee is busy. All ovate, unsexy things are busy. All delinquent things are surprised. All delinquent, susurrous things are surprised. Rough, susurrous things are delinquent. If something is unsexy then it is ovate. If Ricki is susurrous and Ricki is delinquent then Ricki is unsexy. Heda is not surprised.", "logic": "\nDiseased(heda)\nUnsexy(kathye)\nDelinquent(kathye)\nOvate(kathye)\nSusurrous(kathye)\nUnsexy(ricki)\nDiseased(ricki)\nBusy(ricki)\nDelinquent(ricki)\nOvate(ricki)\nSurprised(ricki)\nSusurrous(ricki)\nUnsexy(renee)\nBusy(renee)\nSusurrous(renee)\nSurprised(ricki) -> Susurrous(ricki)\nSusurrous(renee) -> Busy(renee)\nforall x (Ovate(x) and Unsexy(x) -> Busy(x))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) and Susurrous(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Ovate(x) and Susurrous(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Ovate(x))\nSusurrous(ricki) and Delinquent(ricki) -> Unsexy(ricki)\n\nnot Surprised(heda)\n\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> Surprised(x)) <- forall x (Ovate(x) and Susurrous(x) -> Delinquent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Jeanelle is unpierced. Andre is boozy. Andre is bilinear. Andre is vendible. Andre is zippy. Germana is boozy. Germana is unpierced. Germana is sinistral. Germana is bilinear. Germana is vendible. Germana is concealed. Germana is zippy. Deerdre is boozy. Deerdre is sinistral. Deerdre is zippy. If Germana is concealed then Germana is zippy. If Deerdre is zippy then Deerdre is sinistral. All vendible, boozy things are sinistral. All bilinear things are concealed. All bilinear, zippy things are concealed. Rough, zippy things are bilinear. If something is boozy then it is vendible. If Germana is zippy and Germana is bilinear then Germana is boozy. Jeanelle is sinistral.", "logic": "\nUnpierced(jeanelle)\nBoozy(andre)\nBilinear(andre)\nVendible(andre)\nZippy(andre)\nBoozy(germana)\nUnpierced(germana)\nSinistral(germana)\nBilinear(germana)\nVendible(germana)\nConcealed(germana)\nZippy(germana)\nBoozy(deerdre)\nSinistral(deerdre)\nZippy(deerdre)\nConcealed(germana) -> Zippy(germana)\nZippy(deerdre) -> Sinistral(deerdre)\nforall x (Vendible(x) and Boozy(x) -> Sinistral(x))\nforall x (Bilinear(x) -> Concealed(x))\nforall x (Bilinear(x) and Zippy(x) -> Concealed(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) and Zippy(x) -> Bilinear(x))\nforall x (Boozy(x) -> Vendible(x))\nZippy(germana) and Bilinear(germana) -> Boozy(germana)\n\nSinistral(jeanelle)\n\nforall x (Vendible(x) and Boozy(x) -> Sinistral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Basia is unskillful. Sinclare is unfilmed. Sinclare is tardy. Sinclare is spacy. Sinclare is emphasised. Trenna is unfilmed. Trenna is unskillful. Trenna is ordinal. Trenna is tardy. Trenna is spacy. Trenna is unenforced. Trenna is emphasised. Tabbitha is unfilmed. Tabbitha is ordinal. Tabbitha is emphasised. If Trenna is unenforced then Trenna is emphasised. If Tabbitha is emphasised then Tabbitha is ordinal. All spacy, unfilmed things are ordinal. All tardy things are unenforced. All tardy, emphasised things are unenforced. Rough, emphasised things are tardy. If something is unfilmed then it is spacy. If Trenna is emphasised and Trenna is tardy then Trenna is unfilmed. Basia is not spacy.", "logic": "\nUnskillful(basia)\nUnfilmed(sinclare)\nTardy(sinclare)\nSpacy(sinclare)\nEmphasised(sinclare)\nUnfilmed(trenna)\nUnskillful(trenna)\nOrdinal(trenna)\nTardy(trenna)\nSpacy(trenna)\nUnenforced(trenna)\nEmphasised(trenna)\nUnfilmed(tabbitha)\nOrdinal(tabbitha)\nEmphasised(tabbitha)\nUnenforced(trenna) -> Emphasised(trenna)\nEmphasised(tabbitha) -> Ordinal(tabbitha)\nforall x (Spacy(x) and Unfilmed(x) -> Ordinal(x))\nforall x (Tardy(x) -> Unenforced(x))\nforall x (Tardy(x) and Emphasised(x) -> Unenforced(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) and Emphasised(x) -> Tardy(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Spacy(x))\nEmphasised(trenna) and Tardy(trenna) -> Unfilmed(trenna)\n\nnot Spacy(basia)\n\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Spacy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Kelci is express. Wynton is allomerous. Wynton is cationic. Wynton is harmonic. Wynton is hooflike. Margeaux is allomerous. Margeaux is express. Margeaux is serrated. Margeaux is cationic. Margeaux is harmonic. Margeaux is dystopian. Margeaux is hooflike. Ethel is allomerous. Ethel is serrated. Ethel is hooflike. If Margeaux is dystopian then Margeaux is hooflike. If Ethel is hooflike then Ethel is serrated. All harmonic, allomerous things are serrated. All cationic things are dystopian. All cationic, hooflike things are dystopian. Rough, hooflike things are cationic. If something is allomerous then it is harmonic. If Margeaux is hooflike and Margeaux is cationic then Margeaux is allomerous. Kelci is cationic.", "logic": "\nExpress(kelci)\nAllomerous(wynton)\nCationic(wynton)\nHarmonic(wynton)\nHooflike(wynton)\nAllomerous(margeaux)\nExpress(margeaux)\nSerrated(margeaux)\nCationic(margeaux)\nHarmonic(margeaux)\nDystopian(margeaux)\nHooflike(margeaux)\nAllomerous(ethel)\nSerrated(ethel)\nHooflike(ethel)\nDystopian(margeaux) -> Hooflike(margeaux)\nHooflike(ethel) -> Serrated(ethel)\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Allomerous(x) -> Serrated(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) -> Dystopian(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) and Hooflike(x) -> Dystopian(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Hooflike(x) -> Cationic(x))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) -> Harmonic(x))\nHooflike(margeaux) and Cationic(margeaux) -> Allomerous(margeaux)\n\nCationic(kelci)\n\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Hooflike(x) -> Cationic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Maggi is mocking. Fabio is bitchy. Fabio is metabolic. Fabio is veridical. Fabio is uttermost. Gavin is bitchy. Gavin is mocking. Gavin is corrupting. Gavin is metabolic. Gavin is veridical. Gavin is bearish. Gavin is uttermost. Ram is bitchy. Ram is corrupting. Ram is uttermost. If Gavin is bearish then Gavin is uttermost. If Ram is uttermost then Ram is corrupting. All veridical, bitchy things are corrupting. All metabolic things are bearish. All metabolic, uttermost things are bearish. Rough, uttermost things are metabolic. If something is bitchy then it is veridical. If Gavin is uttermost and Gavin is metabolic then Gavin is bitchy. Maggi is not bitchy.", "logic": "\nMocking(maggi)\nBitchy(fabio)\nMetabolic(fabio)\nVeridical(fabio)\nUttermost(fabio)\nBitchy(gavin)\nMocking(gavin)\nCorrupting(gavin)\nMetabolic(gavin)\nVeridical(gavin)\nBearish(gavin)\nUttermost(gavin)\nBitchy(ram)\nCorrupting(ram)\nUttermost(ram)\nBearish(gavin) -> Uttermost(gavin)\nUttermost(ram) -> Corrupting(ram)\nforall x (Veridical(x) and Bitchy(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) -> Bearish(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Uttermost(x) -> Bearish(x))\nforall x (Veridical(x) and Uttermost(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Bitchy(x) -> Veridical(x))\nUttermost(gavin) and Metabolic(gavin) -> Bitchy(gavin)\n\nnot Bitchy(maggi)\n\nnot Bitchy(maggi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Mohamed is leaden. Katerine is weak. Katerine is pulpy. Katerine is unavenged. Katerine is unclogged. Ashley is weak. Ashley is leaden. Ashley is sanguinary. Ashley is pulpy. Ashley is unavenged. Ashley is braless. Ashley is unclogged. Babita is weak. Babita is sanguinary. Babita is unclogged. If Ashley is braless then Ashley is unclogged. If Babita is unclogged then Babita is sanguinary. All unavenged, weak things are sanguinary. All pulpy things are braless. All pulpy, unclogged things are braless. Rough, unclogged things are pulpy. If something is weak then it is unavenged. If Ashley is unclogged and Ashley is pulpy then Ashley is weak. Mohamed is unclogged.", "logic": "\nLeaden(mohamed)\nWeak(katerine)\nPulpy(katerine)\nUnavenged(katerine)\nUnclogged(katerine)\nWeak(ashley)\nLeaden(ashley)\nSanguinary(ashley)\nPulpy(ashley)\nUnavenged(ashley)\nBraless(ashley)\nUnclogged(ashley)\nWeak(babita)\nSanguinary(babita)\nUnclogged(babita)\nBraless(ashley) -> Unclogged(ashley)\nUnclogged(babita) -> Sanguinary(babita)\nforall x (Unavenged(x) and Weak(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) -> Braless(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and Unclogged(x) -> Braless(x))\nforall x (Unavenged(x) and Unclogged(x) -> Pulpy(x))\nforall x (Weak(x) -> Unavenged(x))\nUnclogged(ashley) and Pulpy(ashley) -> Weak(ashley)\n\nUnclogged(mohamed)\n\nUnclogged(mohamed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Maure is unseeing. Troy is vociferous. Troy is anaclitic. Troy is stitched. Troy is vestibular. Orlando is vociferous. Orlando is unseeing. Orlando is begrimed. Orlando is anaclitic. Orlando is stitched. Orlando is heavenward. Orlando is vestibular. Ravil is vociferous. Ravil is begrimed. Ravil is vestibular. If Orlando is heavenward then Orlando is vestibular. If Ravil is vestibular then Ravil is begrimed. All stitched, vociferous things are begrimed. All anaclitic things are heavenward. All anaclitic, vestibular things are heavenward. Rough, vestibular things are anaclitic. If something is vociferous then it is stitched. If Orlando is vestibular and Orlando is anaclitic then Orlando is vociferous. Ravil is not unseeing.", "logic": "\nUnseeing(maure)\nVociferous(troy)\nAnaclitic(troy)\nStitched(troy)\nVestibular(troy)\nVociferous(orlando)\nUnseeing(orlando)\nBegrimed(orlando)\nAnaclitic(orlando)\nStitched(orlando)\nHeavenward(orlando)\nVestibular(orlando)\nVociferous(ravil)\nBegrimed(ravil)\nVestibular(ravil)\nHeavenward(orlando) -> Vestibular(orlando)\nVestibular(ravil) -> Begrimed(ravil)\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Vociferous(x) -> Begrimed(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) -> Heavenward(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and Vestibular(x) -> Heavenward(x))\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Vestibular(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) -> Stitched(x))\nVestibular(orlando) and Anaclitic(orlando) -> Vociferous(orlando)\n\nnot Unseeing(ravil)\n\nnot Unseeing(ravil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Kostas is fingered. Dixie is maladroit. Dixie is damp. Dixie is allegretto. Dixie is unnotched. Fara is maladroit. Fara is fingered. Fara is offended. Fara is damp. Fara is allegretto. Fara is uncooked. Fara is unnotched. Marilu is maladroit. Marilu is offended. Marilu is unnotched. If Fara is uncooked then Fara is unnotched. If Marilu is unnotched then Marilu is offended. All allegretto, maladroit things are offended. All damp things are uncooked. All damp, unnotched things are uncooked. Rough, unnotched things are damp. If something is maladroit then it is allegretto. If Fara is unnotched and Fara is damp then Fara is maladroit. Dixie is fingered.", "logic": "\nFingered(kostas)\nMaladroit(dixie)\nDamp(dixie)\nAllegretto(dixie)\nUnnotched(dixie)\nMaladroit(fara)\nFingered(fara)\nOffended(fara)\nDamp(fara)\nAllegretto(fara)\nUncooked(fara)\nUnnotched(fara)\nMaladroit(marilu)\nOffended(marilu)\nUnnotched(marilu)\nUncooked(fara) -> Unnotched(fara)\nUnnotched(marilu) -> Offended(marilu)\nforall x (Allegretto(x) and Maladroit(x) -> Offended(x))\nforall x (Damp(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Damp(x) and Unnotched(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Allegretto(x) and Unnotched(x) -> Damp(x))\nforall x (Maladroit(x) -> Allegretto(x))\nUnnotched(fara) and Damp(fara) -> Maladroit(fara)\n\nFingered(dixie)\n\nFingered(dixie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "The paulina is unaccepted. The paulina omen the stormy. The paulina omen the eolanda. The stephan is unaccepted. The stephan does not see the stormy. The stephan does not see the eolanda. The stormy action the eolanda. The stormy is inhabited. The stormy is regimented. The eolanda skateboard the stephan. If something action the stormy and the stormy does not eat the eolanda then the stormy omen the paulina. If the eolanda action the stephan then the stephan skateboard the eolanda. If something is unaccepted then it is inhabited. All wide things are unaccepted. If something omen the eolanda then the eolanda is wide. If something omen the eolanda then the eolanda does not need the stormy. The stormy is inhabited.", "logic": "\nUnaccepted(paulina)\nOmen(paulina, stormy)\nOmen(paulina, eolanda)\nUnaccepted(stephan)\nnot Skateboard(stephan, stormy)\nnot Skateboard(stephan, eolanda)\nAction(stormy, eolanda)\nInhabited(stormy)\nRegimented(stormy)\nSkateboard(eolanda, stephan)\nforall x (Action(x, stormy) and not Action(stormy, eolanda) -> Omen(stormy, paulina))\nAction(eolanda, stephan) -> Skateboard(stephan, eolanda)\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) -> Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Wide(x) -> Unaccepted(x))\nforall x (Omen(x, eolanda) -> Wide(eolanda))\nforall x (Omen(x, eolanda) -> not Omen(eolanda, stormy))\n\nInhabited(stormy)\n\ntherefore Inhabited(stormy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The emerson is rotund. The emerson diabolize the britaney. The emerson diabolize the benedicta. The miran is rotund. The miran does not see the britaney. The miran does not see the benedicta. The britaney judder the benedicta. The britaney is perplexing. The britaney is micaceous. The benedicta ghost the miran. If something judder the britaney and the britaney does not eat the benedicta then the britaney diabolize the emerson. If the benedicta judder the miran then the miran ghost the benedicta. If something is rotund then it is perplexing. All sottish things are rotund. If something diabolize the benedicta then the benedicta is sottish. If something diabolize the benedicta then the benedicta does not need the britaney. The britaney is not perplexing.", "logic": "\nRotund(emerson)\nDiabolize(emerson, britaney)\nDiabolize(emerson, benedicta)\nRotund(miran)\nnot Ghost(miran, britaney)\nnot Ghost(miran, benedicta)\nJudder(britaney, benedicta)\nPerplexing(britaney)\nMicaceous(britaney)\nGhost(benedicta, miran)\nforall x (Judder(x, britaney) and not Judder(britaney, benedicta) -> Diabolize(britaney, emerson))\nJudder(benedicta, miran) -> Ghost(miran, benedicta)\nforall x (Rotund(x) -> Perplexing(x))\nforall x (Sottish(x) -> Rotund(x))\nforall x (Diabolize(x, benedicta) -> Sottish(benedicta))\nforall x (Diabolize(x, benedicta) -> not Diabolize(benedicta, britaney))\n\nnot Perplexing(britaney)\n\ntherefore Perplexing(britaney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The edithe is nonmoving. The edithe defer the brigida. The edithe defer the jef. The valma is nonmoving. The valma does not see the brigida. The valma does not see the jef. The brigida mill the jef. The brigida is saclike. The brigida is siamese. The jef bulge the valma. If something mill the brigida and the brigida does not eat the jef then the brigida defer the edithe. If the jef mill the valma then the valma bulge the jef. If something is nonmoving then it is saclike. All diarrheal things are nonmoving. If something defer the jef then the jef is diarrheal. If something defer the jef then the jef does not need the brigida. The jef does not need the brigida.", "logic": "\nNonmoving(edithe)\nDefer(edithe, brigida)\nDefer(edithe, jef)\nNonmoving(valma)\nnot Bulge(valma, brigida)\nnot Bulge(valma, jef)\nMill(brigida, jef)\nSaclike(brigida)\nSiamese(brigida)\nBulge(jef, valma)\nforall x (Mill(x, brigida) and not Mill(brigida, jef) -> Defer(brigida, edithe))\nMill(jef, valma) -> Bulge(valma, jef)\nforall x (Nonmoving(x) -> Saclike(x))\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) -> Nonmoving(x))\nforall x (Defer(x, jef) -> Diarrheal(jef))\nforall x (Defer(x, jef) -> not Defer(jef, brigida))\n\nnot Defer(jef, brigida)\n\nDefer(edithe, jef) and forall x (Defer(x, jef) -> not Defer(jef, brigida)) -> therefore not Defer(jef, brigida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The derrek is unfilled. The derrek bald the nancey. The derrek bald the ellwood. The laurella is unfilled. The laurella does not see the nancey. The laurella does not see the ellwood. The nancey decoct the ellwood. The nancey is precocial. The nancey is sapiens. The ellwood dispossess the laurella. If something decoct the nancey and the nancey does not eat the ellwood then the nancey bald the derrek. If the ellwood decoct the laurella then the laurella dispossess the ellwood. If something is unfilled then it is precocial. All pistillate things are unfilled. If something bald the ellwood then the ellwood is pistillate. If something bald the ellwood then the ellwood does not need the nancey. The ellwood is not pistillate.", "logic": "\nUnfilled(derrek)\nBald(derrek, nancey)\nBald(derrek, ellwood)\nUnfilled(laurella)\nnot Dispossess(laurella, nancey)\nnot Dispossess(laurella, ellwood)\nDecoct(nancey, ellwood)\nPrecocial(nancey)\nSapiens(nancey)\nDispossess(ellwood, laurella)\nforall x (Decoct(x, nancey) and not Decoct(nancey, ellwood) -> Bald(nancey, derrek))\nDecoct(ellwood, laurella) -> Dispossess(laurella, ellwood)\nforall x (Unfilled(x) -> Precocial(x))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) -> Unfilled(x))\nforall x (Bald(x, ellwood) -> Pistillate(ellwood))\nforall x (Bald(x, ellwood) -> not Bald(ellwood, nancey))\n\nnot Pistillate(ellwood)\n\nBald(derrek, ellwood) and forall x (Bald(x, ellwood) -> Pistillate(ellwood)) -> therefore Pistillate(ellwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The jimmie is roughhewn. The jimmie attaint the jemie. The jimmie attaint the gardiner. The elberta is roughhewn. The elberta does not see the jemie. The elberta does not see the gardiner. The jemie speckle the gardiner. The jemie is granulated. The jemie is infectious. The gardiner function the elberta. If something speckle the jemie and the jemie does not eat the gardiner then the jemie attaint the jimmie. If the gardiner speckle the elberta then the elberta function the gardiner. If something is roughhewn then it is granulated. All unifoliate things are roughhewn. If something attaint the gardiner then the gardiner is unifoliate. If something attaint the gardiner then the gardiner does not need the jemie. The gardiner is roughhewn.", "logic": "\nRoughhewn(jimmie)\nAttaint(jimmie, jemie)\nAttaint(jimmie, gardiner)\nRoughhewn(elberta)\nnot Function(elberta, jemie)\nnot Function(elberta, gardiner)\nSpeckle(jemie, gardiner)\nGranulated(jemie)\nInfectious(jemie)\nFunction(gardiner, elberta)\nforall x (Speckle(x, jemie) and not Speckle(jemie, gardiner) -> Attaint(jemie, jimmie))\nSpeckle(gardiner, elberta) -> Function(elberta, gardiner)\nforall x (Roughhewn(x) -> Granulated(x))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Roughhewn(x))\nforall x (Attaint(x, gardiner) -> Unifoliate(gardiner))\nforall x (Attaint(x, gardiner) -> not Attaint(gardiner, jemie))\n\nRoughhewn(gardiner)\n\nAttaint(jimmie, gardiner) and forall x (Attaint(x, gardiner) -> Unifoliate(gardiner)) -> therefore Unifoliate(gardiner) Unifoliate(gardiner) and forall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Roughhewn(x)) -> therefore Roughhewn(gardiner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The kitti is mangey. The kitti dredge the althea. The kitti dredge the kalina. The lela is mangey. The lela does not see the althea. The lela does not see the kalina. The althea smirk the kalina. The althea is profound. The althea is choragic. The kalina collate the lela. If something smirk the althea and the althea does not eat the kalina then the althea dredge the kitti. If the kalina smirk the lela then the lela collate the kalina. If something is mangey then it is profound. All american things are mangey. If something dredge the kalina then the kalina is american. If something dredge the kalina then the kalina does not need the althea. The kalina is not mangey.", "logic": "\nMangey(kitti)\nDredge(kitti, althea)\nDredge(kitti, kalina)\nMangey(lela)\nnot Collate(lela, althea)\nnot Collate(lela, kalina)\nSmirk(althea, kalina)\nProfound(althea)\nChoragic(althea)\nCollate(kalina, lela)\nforall x (Smirk(x, althea) and not Smirk(althea, kalina) -> Dredge(althea, kitti))\nSmirk(kalina, lela) -> Collate(lela, kalina)\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> Profound(x))\nforall x (American(x) -> Mangey(x))\nforall x (Dredge(x, kalina) -> American(kalina))\nforall x (Dredge(x, kalina) -> not Dredge(kalina, althea))\n\nnot Mangey(kalina)\n\nDredge(kitti, kalina) and forall x (Dredge(x, kalina) -> American(kalina)) -> therefore American(kalina) American(kalina) and forall x (American(x) -> Mangey(x)) -> therefore Mangey(kalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The janey is ammonitic. The janey mooch the hailey. The janey mooch the robinson. The celinda is ammonitic. The celinda does not see the hailey. The celinda does not see the robinson. The hailey surpass the robinson. The hailey is tutelar. The hailey is attendant. The robinson divulge the celinda. If something surpass the hailey and the hailey does not eat the robinson then the hailey mooch the janey. If the robinson surpass the celinda then the celinda divulge the robinson. If something is ammonitic then it is tutelar. All primal things are ammonitic. If something mooch the robinson then the robinson is primal. If something mooch the robinson then the robinson does not need the hailey. The robinson is tutelar.", "logic": "\nAmmonitic(janey)\nMooch(janey, hailey)\nMooch(janey, robinson)\nAmmonitic(celinda)\nnot Divulge(celinda, hailey)\nnot Divulge(celinda, robinson)\nSurpass(hailey, robinson)\nTutelar(hailey)\nAttendant(hailey)\nDivulge(robinson, celinda)\nforall x (Surpass(x, hailey) and not Surpass(hailey, robinson) -> Mooch(hailey, janey))\nSurpass(robinson, celinda) -> Divulge(celinda, robinson)\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Tutelar(x))\nforall x (Primal(x) -> Ammonitic(x))\nforall x (Mooch(x, robinson) -> Primal(robinson))\nforall x (Mooch(x, robinson) -> not Mooch(robinson, hailey))\n\nTutelar(robinson)\n\nMooch(janey, robinson) and forall x (Mooch(x, robinson) -> Primal(robinson)) -> therefore Primal(robinson) Primal(robinson) and forall x (Primal(x) -> Ammonitic(x)) -> therefore Ammonitic(robinson) Ammonitic(robinson) and forall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Tutelar(x)) -> therefore Tutelar(robinson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The bryant is boskopoid. The bryant bush the salmon. The bryant bush the barbi. The annadiane is boskopoid. The annadiane does not see the salmon. The annadiane does not see the barbi. The salmon obtrude the barbi. The salmon is albescent. The salmon is inflected. The barbi lobby the annadiane. If something obtrude the salmon and the salmon does not eat the barbi then the salmon bush the bryant. If the barbi obtrude the annadiane then the annadiane lobby the barbi. If something is boskopoid then it is albescent. All moneyed things are boskopoid. If something bush the barbi then the barbi is moneyed. If something bush the barbi then the barbi does not need the salmon. The barbi is not albescent.", "logic": "\nBoskopoid(bryant)\nBush(bryant, salmon)\nBush(bryant, barbi)\nBoskopoid(annadiane)\nnot Lobby(annadiane, salmon)\nnot Lobby(annadiane, barbi)\nObtrude(salmon, barbi)\nAlbescent(salmon)\nInflected(salmon)\nLobby(barbi, annadiane)\nforall x (Obtrude(x, salmon) and not Obtrude(salmon, barbi) -> Bush(salmon, bryant))\nObtrude(barbi, annadiane) -> Lobby(annadiane, barbi)\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Albescent(x))\nforall x (Moneyed(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Bush(x, barbi) -> Moneyed(barbi))\nforall x (Bush(x, barbi) -> not Bush(barbi, salmon))\n\nnot Albescent(barbi)\n\nBush(bryant, barbi) and forall x (Bush(x, barbi) -> Moneyed(barbi)) -> therefore Moneyed(barbi) Moneyed(barbi) and forall x (Moneyed(x) -> Boskopoid(x)) -> therefore Boskopoid(barbi) Boskopoid(barbi) and forall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Albescent(x)) -> therefore Albescent(barbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The charline is enervated. The charline catechise the maureen. The charline catechise the hertha. The rickey is enervated. The rickey does not see the maureen. The rickey does not see the hertha. The maureen overcome the hertha. The maureen is dished. The maureen is pudendal. The hertha rededicate the rickey. If something overcome the maureen and the maureen does not eat the hertha then the maureen catechise the charline. If the hertha overcome the rickey then the rickey rededicate the hertha. If something is enervated then it is dished. All diabolic things are enervated. If something catechise the hertha then the hertha is diabolic. If something catechise the hertha then the hertha does not need the maureen. The maureen is not enervated.", "logic": "\nEnervated(charline)\nCatechise(charline, maureen)\nCatechise(charline, hertha)\nEnervated(rickey)\nnot Rededicate(rickey, maureen)\nnot Rededicate(rickey, hertha)\nOvercome(maureen, hertha)\nDished(maureen)\nPudendal(maureen)\nRededicate(hertha, rickey)\nforall x (Overcome(x, maureen) and not Overcome(maureen, hertha) -> Catechise(maureen, charline))\nOvercome(hertha, rickey) -> Rededicate(rickey, hertha)\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Diabolic(x) -> Enervated(x))\nforall x (Catechise(x, hertha) -> Diabolic(hertha))\nforall x (Catechise(x, hertha) -> not Catechise(hertha, maureen))\n\nnot Enervated(maureen)\n\nforall x (Diabolic(x) -> Enervated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The xavier is rear. The xavier nitrify the hobart. The xavier nitrify the chere. The enrique is rear. The enrique does not see the hobart. The enrique does not see the chere. The hobart encourage the chere. The hobart is plumy. The hobart is paid. The chere devilize the enrique. If something encourage the hobart and the hobart does not eat the chere then the hobart nitrify the xavier. If the chere encourage the enrique then the enrique devilize the chere. If something is rear then it is plumy. All monochrome things are rear. If something nitrify the chere then the chere is monochrome. If something nitrify the chere then the chere does not need the hobart. The hobart nitrify the xavier.", "logic": "\nRear(xavier)\nNitrify(xavier, hobart)\nNitrify(xavier, chere)\nRear(enrique)\nnot Devilize(enrique, hobart)\nnot Devilize(enrique, chere)\nEncourage(hobart, chere)\nPlumy(hobart)\nPaid(hobart)\nDevilize(chere, enrique)\nforall x (Encourage(x, hobart) and not Encourage(hobart, chere) -> Nitrify(hobart, xavier))\nEncourage(chere, enrique) -> Devilize(enrique, chere)\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Plumy(x))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) -> Rear(x))\nforall x (Nitrify(x, chere) -> Monochrome(chere))\nforall x (Nitrify(x, chere) -> not Nitrify(chere, hobart))\n\nNitrify(hobart, xavier)\n\nforall x (Encourage(x, hobart) and not Encourage(hobart, chere) -> Nitrify(hobart, xavier)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The lynnette is ternary. The lynnette supervise the robenia. The lynnette supervise the keenan. The rosalynd is ternary. The rosalynd does not see the robenia. The rosalynd does not see the keenan. The robenia eternalise the keenan. The robenia is held. The robenia is clashing. The keenan mantle the rosalynd. If something eternalise the robenia and the robenia does not eat the keenan then the robenia supervise the lynnette. If the keenan eternalise the rosalynd then the rosalynd mantle the keenan. If something is ternary then it is held. All stuporous things are ternary. If something supervise the keenan then the keenan is stuporous. If something supervise the keenan then the keenan does not need the robenia. The keenan does not see the keenan.", "logic": "\nTernary(lynnette)\nSupervise(lynnette, robenia)\nSupervise(lynnette, keenan)\nTernary(rosalynd)\nnot Mantle(rosalynd, robenia)\nnot Mantle(rosalynd, keenan)\nEternalise(robenia, keenan)\nHeld(robenia)\nClashing(robenia)\nMantle(keenan, rosalynd)\nforall x (Eternalise(x, robenia) and not Eternalise(robenia, keenan) -> Supervise(robenia, lynnette))\nEternalise(keenan, rosalynd) -> Mantle(rosalynd, keenan)\nforall x (Ternary(x) -> Held(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) -> Ternary(x))\nforall x (Supervise(x, keenan) -> Stuporous(keenan))\nforall x (Supervise(x, keenan) -> not Supervise(keenan, robenia))\n\nnot Mantle(keenan, keenan)\n\nnot Mantle(keenan, keenan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The ayn is padded. The ayn revert the leesa. The ayn revert the anna. The moses is padded. The moses does not see the leesa. The moses does not see the anna. The leesa cheerlead the anna. The leesa is soured. The leesa is gelded. The anna canonize the moses. If something cheerlead the leesa and the leesa does not eat the anna then the leesa revert the ayn. If the anna cheerlead the moses then the moses canonize the anna. If something is padded then it is soured. All polyoicous things are padded. If something revert the anna then the anna is polyoicous. If something revert the anna then the anna does not need the leesa. The moses cheerlead the ayn.", "logic": "\nPadded(ayn)\nRevert(ayn, leesa)\nRevert(ayn, anna)\nPadded(moses)\nnot Canonize(moses, leesa)\nnot Canonize(moses, anna)\nCheerlead(leesa, anna)\nSoured(leesa)\nGelded(leesa)\nCanonize(anna, moses)\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, leesa) and not Cheerlead(leesa, anna) -> Revert(leesa, ayn))\nCheerlead(anna, moses) -> Canonize(moses, anna)\nforall x (Padded(x) -> Soured(x))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) -> Padded(x))\nforall x (Revert(x, anna) -> Polyoicous(anna))\nforall x (Revert(x, anna) -> not Revert(anna, leesa))\n\nCheerlead(moses, ayn)\n\nCheerlead(moses, ayn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The arabella is undeterred. The arabella monetise the charmaine. The arabella monetise the batsheva. The kissee is undeterred. The kissee does not see the charmaine. The kissee does not see the batsheva. The charmaine convoke the batsheva. The charmaine is ratty. The charmaine is unenrgetic. The batsheva intubate the kissee. If something convoke the charmaine and the charmaine does not eat the batsheva then the charmaine monetise the arabella. If the batsheva convoke the kissee then the kissee intubate the batsheva. If something is undeterred then it is ratty. All unordered things are undeterred. If something monetise the batsheva then the batsheva is unordered. If something monetise the batsheva then the batsheva does not need the charmaine. The kissee does not need the arabella.", "logic": "\nUndeterred(arabella)\nMonetise(arabella, charmaine)\nMonetise(arabella, batsheva)\nUndeterred(kissee)\nnot Intubate(kissee, charmaine)\nnot Intubate(kissee, batsheva)\nConvoke(charmaine, batsheva)\nRatty(charmaine)\nUnenrgetic(charmaine)\nIntubate(batsheva, kissee)\nforall x (Convoke(x, charmaine) and not Convoke(charmaine, batsheva) -> Monetise(charmaine, arabella))\nConvoke(batsheva, kissee) -> Intubate(kissee, batsheva)\nforall x (Undeterred(x) -> Ratty(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) -> Undeterred(x))\nforall x (Monetise(x, batsheva) -> Unordered(batsheva))\nforall x (Monetise(x, batsheva) -> not Monetise(batsheva, charmaine))\n\nnot Monetise(kissee, arabella)\n\nnot Monetise(kissee, arabella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The conroy is showery. The conroy trample the jory. The conroy trample the belle. The morissa is showery. The morissa does not see the jory. The morissa does not see the belle. The jory gray the belle. The jory is scaley. The jory is inexpiable. The belle ankylose the morissa. If something gray the jory and the jory does not eat the belle then the jory trample the conroy. If the belle gray the morissa then the morissa ankylose the belle. If something is showery then it is scaley. All wiggly things are showery. If something trample the belle then the belle is wiggly. If something trample the belle then the belle does not need the jory. The morissa trample the morissa.", "logic": "\nShowery(conroy)\nTrample(conroy, jory)\nTrample(conroy, belle)\nShowery(morissa)\nnot Ankylose(morissa, jory)\nnot Ankylose(morissa, belle)\nGray(jory, belle)\nScaley(jory)\nInexpiable(jory)\nAnkylose(belle, morissa)\nforall x (Gray(x, jory) and not Gray(jory, belle) -> Trample(jory, conroy))\nGray(belle, morissa) -> Ankylose(morissa, belle)\nforall x (Showery(x) -> Scaley(x))\nforall x (Wiggly(x) -> Showery(x))\nforall x (Trample(x, belle) -> Wiggly(belle))\nforall x (Trample(x, belle) -> not Trample(belle, jory))\n\nTrample(morissa, morissa)\n\nTrample(morissa, morissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The derrek is monochrome. The derrek brave the gabriella. The derrek brave the philly. The stacey is monochrome. The stacey does not see the gabriella. The stacey does not see the philly. The gabriella neutralise the philly. The gabriella is ulcerative. The gabriella is arrant. The philly captivate the stacey. If something neutralise the gabriella and the gabriella does not eat the philly then the gabriella brave the derrek. If the philly neutralise the stacey then the stacey captivate the philly. If something is monochrome then it is ulcerative. All aleatory things are monochrome. If something brave the philly then the philly is aleatory. If something brave the philly then the philly does not need the gabriella. The philly does not eat the derrek.", "logic": "\nMonochrome(derrek)\nBrave(derrek, gabriella)\nBrave(derrek, philly)\nMonochrome(stacey)\nnot Captivate(stacey, gabriella)\nnot Captivate(stacey, philly)\nNeutralise(gabriella, philly)\nUlcerative(gabriella)\nArrant(gabriella)\nCaptivate(philly, stacey)\nforall x (Neutralise(x, gabriella) and not Neutralise(gabriella, philly) -> Brave(gabriella, derrek))\nNeutralise(philly, stacey) -> Captivate(stacey, philly)\nforall x (Monochrome(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Brave(x, philly) -> Aleatory(philly))\nforall x (Brave(x, philly) -> not Brave(philly, gabriella))\n\nnot Neutralise(philly, derrek)\n\nnot Neutralise(philly, derrek) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The nancee is fourteenth. The nancee misuse the joshua. The nancee misuse the adelaide. The philippe is fourteenth. The philippe does not see the joshua. The philippe does not see the adelaide. The joshua subdue the adelaide. The joshua is oversexed. The joshua is slicked. The adelaide detail the philippe. If something subdue the joshua and the joshua does not eat the adelaide then the joshua misuse the nancee. If the adelaide subdue the philippe then the philippe detail the adelaide. If something is fourteenth then it is oversexed. All primal things are fourteenth. If something misuse the adelaide then the adelaide is primal. If something misuse the adelaide then the adelaide does not need the joshua. The joshua subdue the nancee.", "logic": "\nFourteenth(nancee)\nMisuse(nancee, joshua)\nMisuse(nancee, adelaide)\nFourteenth(philippe)\nnot Detail(philippe, joshua)\nnot Detail(philippe, adelaide)\nSubdue(joshua, adelaide)\nOversexed(joshua)\nSlicked(joshua)\nDetail(adelaide, philippe)\nforall x (Subdue(x, joshua) and not Subdue(joshua, adelaide) -> Misuse(joshua, nancee))\nSubdue(adelaide, philippe) -> Detail(philippe, adelaide)\nforall x (Fourteenth(x) -> Oversexed(x))\nforall x (Primal(x) -> Fourteenth(x))\nforall x (Misuse(x, adelaide) -> Primal(adelaide))\nforall x (Misuse(x, adelaide) -> not Misuse(adelaide, joshua))\n\nSubdue(joshua, nancee)\n\nSubdue(joshua, nancee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "Bridie is binomial. Hedi is unworldly. Hedi is muslim. If someone is scathing and sclerotic then they are unabused. All disastrous people are unabused. If someone is unabused and unworldly then they are scathing. White people are scathing. White people are disastrous. If someone is muslim and not sclerotic then they are unworldly. If someone is unabused then they are not binomial. If someone is unabused and not unworldly then they are binomial. Hedi is unworldly.", "logic": "\nBinomial(bridie)\nUnworldly(hedi)\nMuslim(hedi)\nforall x (Scathing(x) and Sclerotic(x) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Disastrous(x) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and Unworldly(x) -> Scathing(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) -> Scathing(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) and not Sclerotic(x) -> Unworldly(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) -> not Binomial(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and not Unworldly(x) -> Binomial(x))\n\nUnworldly(hedi)\n\ntherefore Unworldly(hedi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Berri is lowborn. Jelene is vicarial. Jelene is derivable. If someone is pierced and actinic then they are untended. All bowfront people are untended. If someone is untended and vicarial then they are pierced. White people are pierced. White people are bowfront. If someone is derivable and not actinic then they are vicarial. If someone is untended then they are not lowborn. If someone is untended and not vicarial then they are lowborn. Jelene is not vicarial.", "logic": "\nLowborn(berri)\nVicarial(jelene)\nDerivable(jelene)\nforall x (Pierced(x) and Actinic(x) -> Untended(x))\nforall x (Bowfront(x) -> Untended(x))\nforall x (Untended(x) and Vicarial(x) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) -> Bowfront(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) and not Actinic(x) -> Vicarial(x))\nforall x (Untended(x) -> not Lowborn(x))\nforall x (Untended(x) and not Vicarial(x) -> Lowborn(x))\n\nnot Vicarial(jelene)\n\ntherefore Vicarial(jelene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Murphy is islamic. Berni is shuddering. Berni is costless. If someone is paranormal and conjugated then they are hiemal. All generic people are hiemal. If someone is hiemal and shuddering then they are paranormal. White people are paranormal. White people are generic. If someone is costless and not conjugated then they are shuddering. If someone is hiemal then they are not islamic. If someone is hiemal and not shuddering then they are islamic. Berni is generic.", "logic": "\nIslamic(murphy)\nShuddering(berni)\nCostless(berni)\nforall x (Paranormal(x) and Conjugated(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) and Shuddering(x) -> Paranormal(x))\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Paranormal(x))\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Costless(x) and not Conjugated(x) -> Shuddering(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> not Islamic(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) and not Shuddering(x) -> Islamic(x))\n\nGeneric(berni)\n\nCostless(berni) and forall x (Costless(x) -> Generic(x)) -> therefore Generic(berni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Aigneis is webbed. Mikel is cardinal. Mikel is verboten. If someone is loverlike and nineteen then they are moslem. All unsanitary people are moslem. If someone is moslem and cardinal then they are loverlike. White people are loverlike. White people are unsanitary. If someone is verboten and not nineteen then they are cardinal. If someone is moslem then they are not webbed. If someone is moslem and not cardinal then they are webbed. Mikel is not loverlike.", "logic": "\nWebbed(aigneis)\nCardinal(mikel)\nVerboten(mikel)\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and Nineteen(x) -> Moslem(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Moslem(x))\nforall x (Moslem(x) and Cardinal(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Verboten(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Verboten(x) -> Unsanitary(x))\nforall x (Verboten(x) and not Nineteen(x) -> Cardinal(x))\nforall x (Moslem(x) -> not Webbed(x))\nforall x (Moslem(x) and not Cardinal(x) -> Webbed(x))\n\nnot Loverlike(mikel)\n\nVerboten(mikel) and forall x (Verboten(x) -> Loverlike(x)) -> therefore Loverlike(mikel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Sutton is lxvi. Lay is ilxx. Lay is overage. If someone is briefless and stonelike then they are muffled. All underfed people are muffled. If someone is muffled and ilxx then they are briefless. White people are briefless. White people are underfed. If someone is overage and not stonelike then they are ilxx. If someone is muffled then they are not lxvi. If someone is muffled and not ilxx then they are lxvi. Lay is muffled.", "logic": "\nLxvi(sutton)\nIlxx(lay)\nOverage(lay)\nforall x (Briefless(x) and Stonelike(x) -> Muffled(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> Muffled(x))\nforall x (Muffled(x) and Ilxx(x) -> Briefless(x))\nforall x (Overage(x) -> Briefless(x))\nforall x (Overage(x) -> Underfed(x))\nforall x (Overage(x) and not Stonelike(x) -> Ilxx(x))\nforall x (Muffled(x) -> not Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Muffled(x) and not Ilxx(x) -> Lxvi(x))\n\nMuffled(lay)\n\nOverage(lay) and forall x (Overage(x) -> Underfed(x)) -> therefore Underfed(lay) Underfed(lay) and forall x (Underfed(x) -> Muffled(x)) -> therefore Muffled(lay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Mollie is poised. Ham is senatorial. Ham is conventual. If someone is romanic and abounding then they are mown. All said people are mown. If someone is mown and senatorial then they are romanic. White people are romanic. White people are said. If someone is conventual and not abounding then they are senatorial. If someone is mown then they are not poised. If someone is mown and not senatorial then they are poised. Ham is not mown.", "logic": "\nPoised(mollie)\nSenatorial(ham)\nConventual(ham)\nforall x (Romanic(x) and Abounding(x) -> Mown(x))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Mown(x))\nforall x (Mown(x) and Senatorial(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Said(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and not Abounding(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Mown(x) -> not Poised(x))\nforall x (Mown(x) and not Senatorial(x) -> Poised(x))\n\nnot Mown(ham)\n\nConventual(ham) and forall x (Conventual(x) -> Said(x)) -> therefore Said(ham) Said(ham) and forall x (Said(x) -> Mown(x)) -> therefore Mown(ham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Tristan is panicled. Sherrie is autotelic. Sherrie is monotonous. If someone is infrared and pectinate then they are terrene. All craggy people are terrene. If someone is terrene and autotelic then they are infrared. White people are infrared. White people are craggy. If someone is monotonous and not pectinate then they are autotelic. If someone is terrene then they are not panicled. If someone is terrene and not autotelic then they are panicled. Sherrie is not panicled.", "logic": "\nPanicled(tristan)\nAutotelic(sherrie)\nMonotonous(sherrie)\nforall x (Infrared(x) and Pectinate(x) -> Terrene(x))\nforall x (Craggy(x) -> Terrene(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Autotelic(x) -> Infrared(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> Infrared(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> Craggy(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) and not Pectinate(x) -> Autotelic(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) -> not Panicled(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and not Autotelic(x) -> Panicled(x))\n\nnot Panicled(sherrie)\n\nMonotonous(sherrie) and forall x (Monotonous(x) -> Craggy(x)) -> therefore Craggy(sherrie) Craggy(sherrie) and forall x (Craggy(x) -> Terrene(x)) -> therefore Terrene(sherrie) Terrene(sherrie) and forall x (Terrene(x) -> not Panicled(x)) -> therefore not Panicled(sherrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Fidelity is faustian. Jeff is born. Jeff is publicized. If someone is toiling and cloddish then they are clumsy. All orderly people are clumsy. If someone is clumsy and born then they are toiling. White people are toiling. White people are orderly. If someone is publicized and not cloddish then they are born. If someone is clumsy then they are not faustian. If someone is clumsy and not born then they are faustian. Jeff is faustian.", "logic": "\nFaustian(fidelity)\nBorn(jeff)\nPublicized(jeff)\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Cloddish(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) and Born(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Publicized(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Publicized(x) -> Orderly(x))\nforall x (Publicized(x) and not Cloddish(x) -> Born(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) -> not Faustian(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) and not Born(x) -> Faustian(x))\n\nFaustian(jeff)\n\nPublicized(jeff) and forall x (Publicized(x) -> Orderly(x)) -> therefore Orderly(jeff) Orderly(jeff) and forall x (Orderly(x) -> Clumsy(x)) -> therefore Clumsy(jeff) Clumsy(jeff) and forall x (Clumsy(x) -> not Faustian(x)) -> therefore not Faustian(jeff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Caresse is rhythmic. Geof is basipetal. Geof is braky. If someone is antique and unrelated then they are foxy. All whipping people are foxy. If someone is foxy and basipetal then they are antique. White people are antique. White people are whipping. If someone is braky and not unrelated then they are basipetal. If someone is foxy then they are not rhythmic. If someone is foxy and not basipetal then they are rhythmic. Caresse is not whipping.", "logic": "\nRhythmic(caresse)\nBasipetal(geof)\nBraky(geof)\nforall x (Antique(x) and Unrelated(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Whipping(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) and Basipetal(x) -> Antique(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Antique(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Whipping(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and not Unrelated(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> not Rhythmic(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) and not Basipetal(x) -> Rhythmic(x))\n\nnot Whipping(caresse)\n\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Whipping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Halvard is benignant. Tomi is unmalted. Tomi is ubiquitous. If someone is aneurysmal and unfree then they are incurious. All resiny people are incurious. If someone is incurious and unmalted then they are aneurysmal. White people are aneurysmal. White people are resiny. If someone is ubiquitous and not unfree then they are unmalted. If someone is incurious then they are not benignant. If someone is incurious and not unmalted then they are benignant. Halvard is unmalted.", "logic": "\nBenignant(halvard)\nUnmalted(tomi)\nUbiquitous(tomi)\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) and Unfree(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) and Unmalted(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) and not Unfree(x) -> Unmalted(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> not Benignant(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) and not Unmalted(x) -> Benignant(x))\n\nUnmalted(halvard)\n\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) and not Unfree(x) -> Unmalted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Petra is barbaric. Corbin is eery. Corbin is trite. If someone is intriguing and bully then they are glittering. All mastoid people are glittering. If someone is glittering and eery then they are intriguing. White people are intriguing. White people are mastoid. If someone is trite and not bully then they are eery. If someone is glittering then they are not barbaric. If someone is glittering and not eery then they are barbaric. Petra is not glittering.", "logic": "\nBarbaric(petra)\nEery(corbin)\nTrite(corbin)\nforall x (Intriguing(x) and Bully(x) -> Glittering(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) -> Glittering(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) and Eery(x) -> Intriguing(x))\nforall x (Trite(x) -> Intriguing(x))\nforall x (Trite(x) -> Mastoid(x))\nforall x (Trite(x) and not Bully(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> not Barbaric(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) and not Eery(x) -> Barbaric(x))\n\nnot Glittering(petra)\n\nforall x (Mastoid(x) -> Glittering(x)) <- forall x (Trite(x) -> Mastoid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Candide is obese. Daryn is growing. Daryn is extensible. If someone is edental and untended then they are driven. All precursory people are driven. If someone is driven and growing then they are edental. White people are edental. White people are precursory. If someone is extensible and not untended then they are growing. If someone is driven then they are not obese. If someone is driven and not growing then they are obese. Candide is edental.", "logic": "\nObese(candide)\nGrowing(daryn)\nExtensible(daryn)\nforall x (Edental(x) and Untended(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Growing(x) -> Edental(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Edental(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) and not Untended(x) -> Growing(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) -> not Obese(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and not Growing(x) -> Obese(x))\n\nEdental(candide)\n\nforall x (Driven(x) and Growing(x) -> Edental(x)) <- forall x (Extensible(x) and not Untended(x) -> Growing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Jojo is captious. Nancee is resinated. Nancee is louche. If someone is aneuploid and ameboid then they are unabated. All blase people are unabated. If someone is unabated and resinated then they are aneuploid. White people are aneuploid. White people are blase. If someone is louche and not ameboid then they are resinated. If someone is unabated then they are not captious. If someone is unabated and not resinated then they are captious. Jojo is not ameboid.", "logic": "\nCaptious(jojo)\nResinated(nancee)\nLouche(nancee)\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) and Ameboid(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) and Resinated(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Louche(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Louche(x) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Louche(x) and not Ameboid(x) -> Resinated(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> not Captious(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) and not Resinated(x) -> Captious(x))\n\nnot Ameboid(jojo)\n\nnot Ameboid(jojo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Hali is ninefold. Brenn is opaque. Brenn is liver. If someone is midwestern and literate then they are pregnant. All explicable people are pregnant. If someone is pregnant and opaque then they are midwestern. White people are midwestern. White people are explicable. If someone is liver and not literate then they are opaque. If someone is pregnant then they are not ninefold. If someone is pregnant and not opaque then they are ninefold. Brenn is literate.", "logic": "\nNinefold(hali)\nOpaque(brenn)\nLiver(brenn)\nforall x (Midwestern(x) and Literate(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Explicable(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) and Opaque(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nforall x (Liver(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nforall x (Liver(x) -> Explicable(x))\nforall x (Liver(x) and not Literate(x) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) -> not Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) and not Opaque(x) -> Ninefold(x))\n\nLiterate(brenn)\n\nLiterate(brenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "The darrick is haired. The darrick is didactic. The darrick is electric. The darrick baptise the marchall. The marchall is electric. The marchall tire the darrick. The marchall baptise the zebadiah. The marchall stonewash the darrick. The zebadiah is overfond. The zebadiah is haired. The zebadiah is inchoate. The zebadiah tire the marchall. The zebadiah baptise the darrick. The zebadiah baptise the marchall. The zebadiah stonewash the darrick. The zebadiah stonewash the marchall. If something is electric and it tire the marchall then it stonewash the zebadiah. If something baptise the zebadiah then it baptise the marchall. If something is overfond and it tire the zebadiah then it is haired. If something stonewash the zebadiah then the zebadiah is electric. If something stonewash the marchall then the marchall stonewash the zebadiah. If something baptise the marchall and the marchall is inchoate then the marchall tire the darrick. The darrick is haired.", "logic": "\nHaired(darrick)\nDidactic(darrick)\nElectric(darrick)\nBaptise(darrick, marchall)\nElectric(marchall)\nTire(marchall, darrick)\nBaptise(marchall, zebadiah)\nStonewash(marchall, darrick)\nOverfond(zebadiah)\nHaired(zebadiah)\nInchoate(zebadiah)\nTire(zebadiah, marchall)\nBaptise(zebadiah, darrick)\nBaptise(zebadiah, marchall)\nStonewash(zebadiah, darrick)\nStonewash(zebadiah, marchall)\nforall x (Electric(x) and Tire(x, marchall) -> Stonewash(x, zebadiah))\nforall x (Baptise(x, zebadiah) -> Baptise(x, marchall))\nforall x (Overfond(x) and Tire(x, zebadiah) -> Haired(x))\nforall x (Stonewash(x, zebadiah) -> Electric(zebadiah))\nforall x (Stonewash(x, marchall) -> Stonewash(marchall, zebadiah))\nforall x (Baptise(x, marchall) and Inchoate(marchall) -> Tire(marchall, darrick))\n\nHaired(darrick)\n\ntherefore Haired(darrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The shandee is teutonic. The shandee is mobile. The shandee is firsthand. The shandee overpay the meredith. The meredith is firsthand. The meredith uniformize the shandee. The meredith overpay the elihu. The meredith gore the shandee. The elihu is unchewable. The elihu is teutonic. The elihu is actable. The elihu uniformize the meredith. The elihu overpay the shandee. The elihu overpay the meredith. The elihu gore the shandee. The elihu gore the meredith. If something is firsthand and it uniformize the meredith then it gore the elihu. If something overpay the elihu then it overpay the meredith. If something is unchewable and it uniformize the elihu then it is teutonic. If something gore the elihu then the elihu is firsthand. If something gore the meredith then the meredith gore the elihu. If something overpay the meredith and the meredith is actable then the meredith uniformize the shandee. The meredith does not need the elihu.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(shandee)\nMobile(shandee)\nFirsthand(shandee)\nOverpay(shandee, meredith)\nFirsthand(meredith)\nUniformize(meredith, shandee)\nOverpay(meredith, elihu)\nGore(meredith, shandee)\nUnchewable(elihu)\nTeutonic(elihu)\nActable(elihu)\nUniformize(elihu, meredith)\nOverpay(elihu, shandee)\nOverpay(elihu, meredith)\nGore(elihu, shandee)\nGore(elihu, meredith)\nforall x (Firsthand(x) and Uniformize(x, meredith) -> Gore(x, elihu))\nforall x (Overpay(x, elihu) -> Overpay(x, meredith))\nforall x (Unchewable(x) and Uniformize(x, elihu) -> Teutonic(x))\nforall x (Gore(x, elihu) -> Firsthand(elihu))\nforall x (Gore(x, meredith) -> Gore(meredith, elihu))\nforall x (Overpay(x, meredith) and Actable(meredith) -> Uniformize(meredith, shandee))\n\nnot Overpay(meredith, elihu)\n\ntherefore Overpay(meredith, elihu)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The ebonee is blanketed. The ebonee is viscous. The ebonee is twelve. The ebonee transmit the auberta. The auberta is twelve. The auberta raft the ebonee. The auberta transmit the ashleigh. The auberta pummel the ebonee. The ashleigh is uncousinly. The ashleigh is blanketed. The ashleigh is worsening. The ashleigh raft the auberta. The ashleigh transmit the ebonee. The ashleigh transmit the auberta. The ashleigh pummel the ebonee. The ashleigh pummel the auberta. If something is twelve and it raft the auberta then it pummel the ashleigh. If something transmit the ashleigh then it transmit the auberta. If something is uncousinly and it raft the ashleigh then it is blanketed. If something pummel the ashleigh then the ashleigh is twelve. If something pummel the auberta then the auberta pummel the ashleigh. If something transmit the auberta and the auberta is worsening then the auberta raft the ebonee. The auberta pummel the ashleigh.", "logic": "\nBlanketed(ebonee)\nViscous(ebonee)\nTwelve(ebonee)\nTransmit(ebonee, auberta)\nTwelve(auberta)\nRaft(auberta, ebonee)\nTransmit(auberta, ashleigh)\nPummel(auberta, ebonee)\nUncousinly(ashleigh)\nBlanketed(ashleigh)\nWorsening(ashleigh)\nRaft(ashleigh, auberta)\nTransmit(ashleigh, ebonee)\nTransmit(ashleigh, auberta)\nPummel(ashleigh, ebonee)\nPummel(ashleigh, auberta)\nforall x (Twelve(x) and Raft(x, auberta) -> Pummel(x, ashleigh))\nforall x (Transmit(x, ashleigh) -> Transmit(x, auberta))\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) and Raft(x, ashleigh) -> Blanketed(x))\nforall x (Pummel(x, ashleigh) -> Twelve(ashleigh))\nforall x (Pummel(x, auberta) -> Pummel(auberta, ashleigh))\nforall x (Transmit(x, auberta) and Worsening(auberta) -> Raft(auberta, ebonee))\n\nPummel(auberta, ashleigh)\n\nPummel(ashleigh, auberta) and forall x (Pummel(x, auberta) -> Pummel(auberta, ashleigh)) -> therefore Pummel(auberta, ashleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The hugo is showery. The hugo is second. The hugo is gummed. The hugo impale the ardine. The ardine is gummed. The ardine wither the hugo. The ardine impale the torin. The ardine redden the hugo. The torin is pejorative. The torin is showery. The torin is nosocomial. The torin wither the ardine. The torin impale the hugo. The torin impale the ardine. The torin redden the hugo. The torin redden the ardine. If something is gummed and it wither the ardine then it redden the torin. If something impale the torin then it impale the ardine. If something is pejorative and it wither the torin then it is showery. If something redden the torin then the torin is gummed. If something redden the ardine then the ardine redden the torin. If something impale the ardine and the ardine is nosocomial then the ardine wither the hugo. The ardine does not need the ardine.", "logic": "\nShowery(hugo)\nSecond(hugo)\nGummed(hugo)\nImpale(hugo, ardine)\nGummed(ardine)\nWither(ardine, hugo)\nImpale(ardine, torin)\nRedden(ardine, hugo)\nPejorative(torin)\nShowery(torin)\nNosocomial(torin)\nWither(torin, ardine)\nImpale(torin, hugo)\nImpale(torin, ardine)\nRedden(torin, hugo)\nRedden(torin, ardine)\nforall x (Gummed(x) and Wither(x, ardine) -> Redden(x, torin))\nforall x (Impale(x, torin) -> Impale(x, ardine))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) and Wither(x, torin) -> Showery(x))\nforall x (Redden(x, torin) -> Gummed(torin))\nforall x (Redden(x, ardine) -> Redden(ardine, torin))\nforall x (Impale(x, ardine) and Nosocomial(ardine) -> Wither(ardine, hugo))\n\nnot Impale(ardine, ardine)\n\nImpale(ardine, torin) and forall x (Impale(x, torin) -> Impale(x, ardine)) -> therefore Impale(ardine, ardine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The maya is kittenish. The maya is anestric. The maya is aired. The maya eagle the issi. The issi is aired. The issi bode the maya. The issi eagle the jeana. The issi plummet the maya. The jeana is resonating. The jeana is kittenish. The jeana is aeronautic. The jeana bode the issi. The jeana eagle the maya. The jeana eagle the issi. The jeana plummet the maya. The jeana plummet the issi. If something is aired and it bode the issi then it plummet the jeana. If something eagle the jeana then it eagle the issi. If something is resonating and it bode the jeana then it is kittenish. If something plummet the jeana then the jeana is aired. If something plummet the issi then the issi plummet the jeana. If something eagle the issi and the issi is aeronautic then the issi bode the maya. The jeana is aired.", "logic": "\nKittenish(maya)\nAnestric(maya)\nAired(maya)\nEagle(maya, issi)\nAired(issi)\nBode(issi, maya)\nEagle(issi, jeana)\nPlummet(issi, maya)\nResonating(jeana)\nKittenish(jeana)\nAeronautic(jeana)\nBode(jeana, issi)\nEagle(jeana, maya)\nEagle(jeana, issi)\nPlummet(jeana, maya)\nPlummet(jeana, issi)\nforall x (Aired(x) and Bode(x, issi) -> Plummet(x, jeana))\nforall x (Eagle(x, jeana) -> Eagle(x, issi))\nforall x (Resonating(x) and Bode(x, jeana) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Plummet(x, jeana) -> Aired(jeana))\nforall x (Plummet(x, issi) -> Plummet(issi, jeana))\nforall x (Eagle(x, issi) and Aeronautic(issi) -> Bode(issi, maya))\n\nAired(jeana)\n\nPlummet(jeana, issi) and forall x (Plummet(x, issi) -> Plummet(issi, jeana)) -> therefore Plummet(issi, jeana) Plummet(issi, jeana) and forall x (Plummet(x, jeana) -> Aired(jeana)) -> therefore Aired(jeana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The una is caesarian. The una is fruitless. The una is albuminous. The una hurt the hew. The hew is albuminous. The hew port the una. The hew hurt the genvieve. The hew misdemean the una. The genvieve is pyrolytic. The genvieve is caesarian. The genvieve is unsilenced. The genvieve port the hew. The genvieve hurt the una. The genvieve hurt the hew. The genvieve misdemean the una. The genvieve misdemean the hew. If something is albuminous and it port the hew then it misdemean the genvieve. If something hurt the genvieve then it hurt the hew. If something is pyrolytic and it port the genvieve then it is caesarian. If something misdemean the genvieve then the genvieve is albuminous. If something misdemean the hew then the hew misdemean the genvieve. If something hurt the hew and the hew is unsilenced then the hew port the una. The genvieve is not albuminous.", "logic": "\nCaesarian(una)\nFruitless(una)\nAlbuminous(una)\nHurt(una, hew)\nAlbuminous(hew)\nPort(hew, una)\nHurt(hew, genvieve)\nMisdemean(hew, una)\nPyrolytic(genvieve)\nCaesarian(genvieve)\nUnsilenced(genvieve)\nPort(genvieve, hew)\nHurt(genvieve, una)\nHurt(genvieve, hew)\nMisdemean(genvieve, una)\nMisdemean(genvieve, hew)\nforall x (Albuminous(x) and Port(x, hew) -> Misdemean(x, genvieve))\nforall x (Hurt(x, genvieve) -> Hurt(x, hew))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) and Port(x, genvieve) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, genvieve) -> Albuminous(genvieve))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, hew) -> Misdemean(hew, genvieve))\nforall x (Hurt(x, hew) and Unsilenced(hew) -> Port(hew, una))\n\nnot Albuminous(genvieve)\n\nMisdemean(genvieve, hew) and forall x (Misdemean(x, hew) -> Misdemean(hew, genvieve)) -> therefore Misdemean(hew, genvieve) Misdemean(hew, genvieve) and forall x (Misdemean(x, genvieve) -> Albuminous(genvieve)) -> therefore Albuminous(genvieve)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The leighton is russet. The leighton is featured. The leighton is cityfied. The leighton carnalize the aile. The aile is cityfied. The aile recrudesce the leighton. The aile carnalize the uriah. The aile interview the leighton. The uriah is pleural. The uriah is russet. The uriah is unskilled. The uriah recrudesce the aile. The uriah carnalize the leighton. The uriah carnalize the aile. The uriah interview the leighton. The uriah interview the aile. If something is cityfied and it recrudesce the aile then it interview the uriah. If something carnalize the uriah then it carnalize the aile. If something is pleural and it recrudesce the uriah then it is russet. If something interview the uriah then the uriah is cityfied. If something interview the aile then the aile interview the uriah. If something carnalize the aile and the aile is unskilled then the aile recrudesce the leighton. The uriah interview the uriah.", "logic": "\nRusset(leighton)\nFeatured(leighton)\nCityfied(leighton)\nCarnalize(leighton, aile)\nCityfied(aile)\nRecrudesce(aile, leighton)\nCarnalize(aile, uriah)\nInterview(aile, leighton)\nPleural(uriah)\nRusset(uriah)\nUnskilled(uriah)\nRecrudesce(uriah, aile)\nCarnalize(uriah, leighton)\nCarnalize(uriah, aile)\nInterview(uriah, leighton)\nInterview(uriah, aile)\nforall x (Cityfied(x) and Recrudesce(x, aile) -> Interview(x, uriah))\nforall x (Carnalize(x, uriah) -> Carnalize(x, aile))\nforall x (Pleural(x) and Recrudesce(x, uriah) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Interview(x, uriah) -> Cityfied(uriah))\nforall x (Interview(x, aile) -> Interview(aile, uriah))\nforall x (Carnalize(x, aile) and Unskilled(aile) -> Recrudesce(aile, leighton))\n\nInterview(uriah, uriah)\n\nInterview(uriah, aile) and forall x (Interview(x, aile) -> Interview(aile, uriah)) -> therefore Interview(aile, uriah) Interview(aile, uriah) and forall x (Interview(x, uriah) -> Cityfied(uriah)) -> therefore Cityfied(uriah) Cityfied(uriah) and Recrudesce(uriah, aile) and forall x (Cityfied(x) and Recrudesce(x, aile) -> Interview(x, uriah)) -> therefore Interview(uriah, uriah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The weider is icky. The weider is efficient. The weider is abaxial. The weider plump the siana. The siana is abaxial. The siana headline the weider. The siana plump the aurilia. The siana blear the weider. The aurilia is half. The aurilia is icky. The aurilia is broadloom. The aurilia headline the siana. The aurilia plump the weider. The aurilia plump the siana. The aurilia blear the weider. The aurilia blear the siana. If something is abaxial and it headline the siana then it blear the aurilia. If something plump the aurilia then it plump the siana. If something is half and it headline the aurilia then it is icky. If something blear the aurilia then the aurilia is abaxial. If something blear the siana then the siana blear the aurilia. If something plump the siana and the siana is broadloom then the siana headline the weider. The aurilia does not see the aurilia.", "logic": "\nIcky(weider)\nEfficient(weider)\nAbaxial(weider)\nPlump(weider, siana)\nAbaxial(siana)\nHeadline(siana, weider)\nPlump(siana, aurilia)\nBlear(siana, weider)\nHalf(aurilia)\nIcky(aurilia)\nBroadloom(aurilia)\nHeadline(aurilia, siana)\nPlump(aurilia, weider)\nPlump(aurilia, siana)\nBlear(aurilia, weider)\nBlear(aurilia, siana)\nforall x (Abaxial(x) and Headline(x, siana) -> Blear(x, aurilia))\nforall x (Plump(x, aurilia) -> Plump(x, siana))\nforall x (Half(x) and Headline(x, aurilia) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Blear(x, aurilia) -> Abaxial(aurilia))\nforall x (Blear(x, siana) -> Blear(siana, aurilia))\nforall x (Plump(x, siana) and Broadloom(siana) -> Headline(siana, weider))\n\nnot Blear(aurilia, aurilia)\n\nBlear(aurilia, siana) and forall x (Blear(x, siana) -> Blear(siana, aurilia)) -> therefore Blear(siana, aurilia) Blear(siana, aurilia) and forall x (Blear(x, aurilia) -> Abaxial(aurilia)) -> therefore Abaxial(aurilia) Abaxial(aurilia) and Headline(aurilia, siana) and forall x (Abaxial(x) and Headline(x, siana) -> Blear(x, aurilia)) -> therefore Blear(aurilia, aurilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The kimberli is bimetallic. The kimberli is botched. The kimberli is acrophobic. The kimberli benday the kania. The kania is acrophobic. The kania nudge the kimberli. The kania benday the serena. The kania heal the kimberli. The serena is bacchantic. The serena is bimetallic. The serena is reconciled. The serena nudge the kania. The serena benday the kimberli. The serena benday the kania. The serena heal the kimberli. The serena heal the kania. If something is acrophobic and it nudge the kania then it heal the serena. If something benday the serena then it benday the kania. If something is bacchantic and it nudge the serena then it is bimetallic. If something heal the serena then the serena is acrophobic. If something heal the kania then the kania heal the serena. If something benday the kania and the kania is reconciled then the kania nudge the kimberli. The kimberli does not see the serena.", "logic": "\nBimetallic(kimberli)\nBotched(kimberli)\nAcrophobic(kimberli)\nBenday(kimberli, kania)\nAcrophobic(kania)\nNudge(kania, kimberli)\nBenday(kania, serena)\nHeal(kania, kimberli)\nBacchantic(serena)\nBimetallic(serena)\nReconciled(serena)\nNudge(serena, kania)\nBenday(serena, kimberli)\nBenday(serena, kania)\nHeal(serena, kimberli)\nHeal(serena, kania)\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) and Nudge(x, kania) -> Heal(x, serena))\nforall x (Benday(x, serena) -> Benday(x, kania))\nforall x (Bacchantic(x) and Nudge(x, serena) -> Bimetallic(x))\nforall x (Heal(x, serena) -> Acrophobic(serena))\nforall x (Heal(x, kania) -> Heal(kania, serena))\nforall x (Benday(x, kania) and Reconciled(kania) -> Nudge(kania, kimberli))\n\nnot Heal(kimberli, serena)\n\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) and Nudge(x, kania) -> Heal(x, serena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The marcio is aplitic. The marcio is diabolic. The marcio is umbellar. The marcio stall the christyna. The christyna is umbellar. The christyna wince the marcio. The christyna stall the inez. The christyna misname the marcio. The inez is hipless. The inez is aplitic. The inez is florid. The inez wince the christyna. The inez stall the marcio. The inez stall the christyna. The inez misname the marcio. The inez misname the christyna. If something is umbellar and it wince the christyna then it misname the inez. If something stall the inez then it stall the christyna. If something is hipless and it wince the inez then it is aplitic. If something misname the inez then the inez is umbellar. If something misname the christyna then the christyna misname the inez. If something stall the christyna and the christyna is florid then the christyna wince the marcio. The christyna is aplitic.", "logic": "\nAplitic(marcio)\nDiabolic(marcio)\nUmbellar(marcio)\nStall(marcio, christyna)\nUmbellar(christyna)\nWince(christyna, marcio)\nStall(christyna, inez)\nMisname(christyna, marcio)\nHipless(inez)\nAplitic(inez)\nFlorid(inez)\nWince(inez, christyna)\nStall(inez, marcio)\nStall(inez, christyna)\nMisname(inez, marcio)\nMisname(inez, christyna)\nforall x (Umbellar(x) and Wince(x, christyna) -> Misname(x, inez))\nforall x (Stall(x, inez) -> Stall(x, christyna))\nforall x (Hipless(x) and Wince(x, inez) -> Aplitic(x))\nforall x (Misname(x, inez) -> Umbellar(inez))\nforall x (Misname(x, christyna) -> Misname(christyna, inez))\nforall x (Stall(x, christyna) and Florid(christyna) -> Wince(christyna, marcio))\n\nAplitic(christyna)\n\nforall x (Hipless(x) and Wince(x, inez) -> Aplitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The christoph is pneumonic. The christoph is bespoken. The christoph is parttime. The christoph track the preston. The preston is parttime. The preston slosh the christoph. The preston track the gabriel. The preston upset the christoph. The gabriel is pitiable. The gabriel is pneumonic. The gabriel is metrical. The gabriel slosh the preston. The gabriel track the christoph. The gabriel track the preston. The gabriel upset the christoph. The gabriel upset the preston. If something is parttime and it slosh the preston then it upset the gabriel. If something track the gabriel then it track the preston. If something is pitiable and it slosh the gabriel then it is pneumonic. If something upset the gabriel then the gabriel is parttime. If something upset the preston then the preston upset the gabriel. If something track the preston and the preston is metrical then the preston slosh the christoph. The christoph is not pitiable.", "logic": "\nPneumonic(christoph)\nBespoken(christoph)\nParttime(christoph)\nTrack(christoph, preston)\nParttime(preston)\nSlosh(preston, christoph)\nTrack(preston, gabriel)\nUpset(preston, christoph)\nPitiable(gabriel)\nPneumonic(gabriel)\nMetrical(gabriel)\nSlosh(gabriel, preston)\nTrack(gabriel, christoph)\nTrack(gabriel, preston)\nUpset(gabriel, christoph)\nUpset(gabriel, preston)\nforall x (Parttime(x) and Slosh(x, preston) -> Upset(x, gabriel))\nforall x (Track(x, gabriel) -> Track(x, preston))\nforall x (Pitiable(x) and Slosh(x, gabriel) -> Pneumonic(x))\nforall x (Upset(x, gabriel) -> Parttime(gabriel))\nforall x (Upset(x, preston) -> Upset(preston, gabriel))\nforall x (Track(x, preston) and Metrical(preston) -> Slosh(preston, christoph))\n\nnot Pitiable(christoph)\n\nnot Pitiable(christoph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The ansley is nonthermal. The ansley is chlamydial. The ansley is undefined. The ansley cloak the tatiana. The tatiana is undefined. The tatiana deaerate the ansley. The tatiana cloak the ozzie. The tatiana enforce the ansley. The ozzie is meiotic. The ozzie is nonthermal. The ozzie is seeable. The ozzie deaerate the tatiana. The ozzie cloak the ansley. The ozzie cloak the tatiana. The ozzie enforce the ansley. The ozzie enforce the tatiana. If something is undefined and it deaerate the tatiana then it enforce the ozzie. If something cloak the ozzie then it cloak the tatiana. If something is meiotic and it deaerate the ozzie then it is nonthermal. If something enforce the ozzie then the ozzie is undefined. If something enforce the tatiana then the tatiana enforce the ozzie. If something cloak the tatiana and the tatiana is seeable then the tatiana deaerate the ansley. The tatiana enforce the tatiana.", "logic": "\nNonthermal(ansley)\nChlamydial(ansley)\nUndefined(ansley)\nCloak(ansley, tatiana)\nUndefined(tatiana)\nDeaerate(tatiana, ansley)\nCloak(tatiana, ozzie)\nEnforce(tatiana, ansley)\nMeiotic(ozzie)\nNonthermal(ozzie)\nSeeable(ozzie)\nDeaerate(ozzie, tatiana)\nCloak(ozzie, ansley)\nCloak(ozzie, tatiana)\nEnforce(ozzie, ansley)\nEnforce(ozzie, tatiana)\nforall x (Undefined(x) and Deaerate(x, tatiana) -> Enforce(x, ozzie))\nforall x (Cloak(x, ozzie) -> Cloak(x, tatiana))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Deaerate(x, ozzie) -> Nonthermal(x))\nforall x (Enforce(x, ozzie) -> Undefined(ozzie))\nforall x (Enforce(x, tatiana) -> Enforce(tatiana, ozzie))\nforall x (Cloak(x, tatiana) and Seeable(tatiana) -> Deaerate(tatiana, ansley))\n\nEnforce(tatiana, tatiana)\n\nEnforce(tatiana, tatiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The xaviera is assiduous. The xaviera is praetorian. The xaviera is groovy. The xaviera whizz the saxe. The saxe is groovy. The saxe catechise the xaviera. The saxe whizz the zorine. The saxe process the xaviera. The zorine is skillful. The zorine is assiduous. The zorine is asynergic. The zorine catechise the saxe. The zorine whizz the xaviera. The zorine whizz the saxe. The zorine process the xaviera. The zorine process the saxe. If something is groovy and it catechise the saxe then it process the zorine. If something whizz the zorine then it whizz the saxe. If something is skillful and it catechise the zorine then it is assiduous. If something process the zorine then the zorine is groovy. If something process the saxe then the saxe process the zorine. If something whizz the saxe and the saxe is asynergic then the saxe catechise the xaviera. The xaviera does not like the xaviera.", "logic": "\nAssiduous(xaviera)\nPraetorian(xaviera)\nGroovy(xaviera)\nWhizz(xaviera, saxe)\nGroovy(saxe)\nCatechise(saxe, xaviera)\nWhizz(saxe, zorine)\nProcess(saxe, xaviera)\nSkillful(zorine)\nAssiduous(zorine)\nAsynergic(zorine)\nCatechise(zorine, saxe)\nWhizz(zorine, xaviera)\nWhizz(zorine, saxe)\nProcess(zorine, xaviera)\nProcess(zorine, saxe)\nforall x (Groovy(x) and Catechise(x, saxe) -> Process(x, zorine))\nforall x (Whizz(x, zorine) -> Whizz(x, saxe))\nforall x (Skillful(x) and Catechise(x, zorine) -> Assiduous(x))\nforall x (Process(x, zorine) -> Groovy(zorine))\nforall x (Process(x, saxe) -> Process(saxe, zorine))\nforall x (Whizz(x, saxe) and Asynergic(saxe) -> Catechise(saxe, xaviera))\n\nnot Catechise(xaviera, xaviera)\n\nnot Catechise(xaviera, xaviera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The chancey is confusing. The chancey is flagging. The chancey is warped. The chancey testify the rafaelita. The rafaelita is warped. The rafaelita blackguard the chancey. The rafaelita testify the vickie. The rafaelita copyread the chancey. The vickie is honorific. The vickie is confusing. The vickie is redbrick. The vickie blackguard the rafaelita. The vickie testify the chancey. The vickie testify the rafaelita. The vickie copyread the chancey. The vickie copyread the rafaelita. If something is warped and it blackguard the rafaelita then it copyread the vickie. If something testify the vickie then it testify the rafaelita. If something is honorific and it blackguard the vickie then it is confusing. If something copyread the vickie then the vickie is warped. If something copyread the rafaelita then the rafaelita copyread the vickie. If something testify the rafaelita and the rafaelita is redbrick then the rafaelita blackguard the chancey. The rafaelita blackguard the rafaelita.", "logic": "\nConfusing(chancey)\nFlagging(chancey)\nWarped(chancey)\nTestify(chancey, rafaelita)\nWarped(rafaelita)\nBlackguard(rafaelita, chancey)\nTestify(rafaelita, vickie)\nCopyread(rafaelita, chancey)\nHonorific(vickie)\nConfusing(vickie)\nRedbrick(vickie)\nBlackguard(vickie, rafaelita)\nTestify(vickie, chancey)\nTestify(vickie, rafaelita)\nCopyread(vickie, chancey)\nCopyread(vickie, rafaelita)\nforall x (Warped(x) and Blackguard(x, rafaelita) -> Copyread(x, vickie))\nforall x (Testify(x, vickie) -> Testify(x, rafaelita))\nforall x (Honorific(x) and Blackguard(x, vickie) -> Confusing(x))\nforall x (Copyread(x, vickie) -> Warped(vickie))\nforall x (Copyread(x, rafaelita) -> Copyread(rafaelita, vickie))\nforall x (Testify(x, rafaelita) and Redbrick(rafaelita) -> Blackguard(rafaelita, chancey))\n\nBlackguard(rafaelita, rafaelita)\n\nBlackguard(rafaelita, rafaelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The hetty is blae. The hetty is narcotised. The hetty is cloggy. The hetty conceal the rivi. The rivi is cloggy. The rivi delay the hetty. The rivi conceal the gena. The rivi loose the hetty. The gena is detractive. The gena is blae. The gena is uptown. The gena delay the rivi. The gena conceal the hetty. The gena conceal the rivi. The gena loose the hetty. The gena loose the rivi. If something is cloggy and it delay the rivi then it loose the gena. If something conceal the gena then it conceal the rivi. If something is detractive and it delay the gena then it is blae. If something loose the gena then the gena is cloggy. If something loose the rivi then the rivi loose the gena. If something conceal the rivi and the rivi is uptown then the rivi delay the hetty. The rivi is not detractive.", "logic": "\nBlae(hetty)\nNarcotised(hetty)\nCloggy(hetty)\nConceal(hetty, rivi)\nCloggy(rivi)\nDelay(rivi, hetty)\nConceal(rivi, gena)\nLoose(rivi, hetty)\nDetractive(gena)\nBlae(gena)\nUptown(gena)\nDelay(gena, rivi)\nConceal(gena, hetty)\nConceal(gena, rivi)\nLoose(gena, hetty)\nLoose(gena, rivi)\nforall x (Cloggy(x) and Delay(x, rivi) -> Loose(x, gena))\nforall x (Conceal(x, gena) -> Conceal(x, rivi))\nforall x (Detractive(x) and Delay(x, gena) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Loose(x, gena) -> Cloggy(gena))\nforall x (Loose(x, rivi) -> Loose(rivi, gena))\nforall x (Conceal(x, rivi) and Uptown(rivi) -> Delay(rivi, hetty))\n\nnot Detractive(rivi)\n\nnot Detractive(rivi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The mika is covariant. The mika is dulled. The mika is monocled. The mika complexion the sandy. The sandy is monocled. The sandy yawp the mika. The sandy complexion the pembroke. The sandy remake the mika. The pembroke is quaternary. The pembroke is covariant. The pembroke is awaited. The pembroke yawp the sandy. The pembroke complexion the mika. The pembroke complexion the sandy. The pembroke remake the mika. The pembroke remake the sandy. If something is monocled and it yawp the sandy then it remake the pembroke. If something complexion the pembroke then it complexion the sandy. If something is quaternary and it yawp the pembroke then it is covariant. If something remake the pembroke then the pembroke is monocled. If something remake the sandy then the sandy remake the pembroke. If something complexion the sandy and the sandy is awaited then the sandy yawp the mika. The sandy is awaited.", "logic": "\nCovariant(mika)\nDulled(mika)\nMonocled(mika)\nComplexion(mika, sandy)\nMonocled(sandy)\nYawp(sandy, mika)\nComplexion(sandy, pembroke)\nRemake(sandy, mika)\nQuaternary(pembroke)\nCovariant(pembroke)\nAwaited(pembroke)\nYawp(pembroke, sandy)\nComplexion(pembroke, mika)\nComplexion(pembroke, sandy)\nRemake(pembroke, mika)\nRemake(pembroke, sandy)\nforall x (Monocled(x) and Yawp(x, sandy) -> Remake(x, pembroke))\nforall x (Complexion(x, pembroke) -> Complexion(x, sandy))\nforall x (Quaternary(x) and Yawp(x, pembroke) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Remake(x, pembroke) -> Monocled(pembroke))\nforall x (Remake(x, sandy) -> Remake(sandy, pembroke))\nforall x (Complexion(x, sandy) and Awaited(sandy) -> Yawp(sandy, mika))\n\nAwaited(sandy)\n\nAwaited(sandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "Josh is extra. Josh is stoic. Davidde is dismissive. All stoic things are plushy. If something is extra and dismissive then it is tenacious. All cautionary things are stoic. If something is stoic then it is tenacious. Big things are extra. All cautionary things are dismissive. If something is cautionary and tenacious then it is trabecular. If something is tenacious then it is cautionary. Josh is extra.", "logic": "\nExtra(josh)\nStoic(josh)\nDismissive(davidde)\nforall x (Stoic(x) -> Plushy(x))\nforall x (Extra(x) and Dismissive(x) -> Tenacious(x))\nforall x (Cautionary(x) -> Stoic(x))\nforall x (Stoic(x) -> Tenacious(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Extra(x))\nforall x (Cautionary(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Cautionary(x) and Tenacious(x) -> Trabecular(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Cautionary(x))\n\nExtra(josh)\n\ntherefore Extra(josh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Cinda is midi. Cinda is enhanced. Philly is refulgent. All enhanced things are premiere. If something is midi and refulgent then it is zonary. All gossipy things are enhanced. If something is enhanced then it is zonary. Big things are midi. All gossipy things are refulgent. If something is gossipy and zonary then it is adynamic. If something is zonary then it is gossipy. Philly is not refulgent.", "logic": "\nMidi(cinda)\nEnhanced(cinda)\nRefulgent(philly)\nforall x (Enhanced(x) -> Premiere(x))\nforall x (Midi(x) and Refulgent(x) -> Zonary(x))\nforall x (Gossipy(x) -> Enhanced(x))\nforall x (Enhanced(x) -> Zonary(x))\nforall x (Zonary(x) -> Midi(x))\nforall x (Gossipy(x) -> Refulgent(x))\nforall x (Gossipy(x) and Zonary(x) -> Adynamic(x))\nforall x (Zonary(x) -> Gossipy(x))\n\nnot Refulgent(philly)\n\ntherefore Refulgent(philly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Kala is swelled. Kala is blighted. Barby is rutty. All blighted things are visualized. If something is swelled and rutty then it is sanguinary. All neonatal things are blighted. If something is blighted then it is sanguinary. Big things are swelled. All neonatal things are rutty. If something is neonatal and sanguinary then it is riskless. If something is sanguinary then it is neonatal. Kala is sanguinary.", "logic": "\nSwelled(kala)\nBlighted(kala)\nRutty(barby)\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Visualized(x))\nforall x (Swelled(x) and Rutty(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Blighted(x))\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> Swelled(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Rutty(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) and Sanguinary(x) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> Neonatal(x))\n\nSanguinary(kala)\n\nBlighted(kala) and forall x (Blighted(x) -> Sanguinary(x)) -> therefore Sanguinary(kala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Zulema is frozen. Zulema is plowed. Matilda is utility. All plowed things are arenaceous. If something is frozen and utility then it is officious. All hurried things are plowed. If something is plowed then it is officious. Big things are frozen. All hurried things are utility. If something is hurried and officious then it is bisexual. If something is officious then it is hurried. Zulema is not officious.", "logic": "\nFrozen(zulema)\nPlowed(zulema)\nUtility(matilda)\nforall x (Plowed(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\nforall x (Frozen(x) and Utility(x) -> Officious(x))\nforall x (Hurried(x) -> Plowed(x))\nforall x (Plowed(x) -> Officious(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) -> Frozen(x))\nforall x (Hurried(x) -> Utility(x))\nforall x (Hurried(x) and Officious(x) -> Bisexual(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) -> Hurried(x))\n\nnot Officious(zulema)\n\nPlowed(zulema) and forall x (Plowed(x) -> Officious(x)) -> therefore Officious(zulema)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Jeni is samoan. Jeni is milled. Brear is bicornuous. All milled things are derisive. If something is samoan and bicornuous then it is eyed. All humourless things are milled. If something is milled then it is eyed. Big things are samoan. All humourless things are bicornuous. If something is humourless and eyed then it is uremic. If something is eyed then it is humourless. Jeni is humourless.", "logic": "\nSamoan(jeni)\nMilled(jeni)\nBicornuous(brear)\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Derisive(x))\nforall x (Samoan(x) and Bicornuous(x) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Humourless(x) -> Milled(x))\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Samoan(x))\nforall x (Humourless(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Humourless(x) and Eyed(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Humourless(x))\n\nHumourless(jeni)\n\nMilled(jeni) and forall x (Milled(x) -> Eyed(x)) -> therefore Eyed(jeni) Eyed(jeni) and forall x (Eyed(x) -> Humourless(x)) -> therefore Humourless(jeni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Enoch is favourable. Enoch is bibbed. Ulla is sinkable. All bibbed things are ambulacral. If something is favourable and sinkable then it is lathery. All hipped things are bibbed. If something is bibbed then it is lathery. Big things are favourable. All hipped things are sinkable. If something is hipped and lathery then it is hydraulic. If something is lathery then it is hipped. Enoch is not hipped.", "logic": "\nFavourable(enoch)\nBibbed(enoch)\nSinkable(ulla)\nforall x (Bibbed(x) -> Ambulacral(x))\nforall x (Favourable(x) and Sinkable(x) -> Lathery(x))\nforall x (Hipped(x) -> Bibbed(x))\nforall x (Bibbed(x) -> Lathery(x))\nforall x (Lathery(x) -> Favourable(x))\nforall x (Hipped(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Hipped(x) and Lathery(x) -> Hydraulic(x))\nforall x (Lathery(x) -> Hipped(x))\n\nnot Hipped(enoch)\n\nBibbed(enoch) and forall x (Bibbed(x) -> Lathery(x)) -> therefore Lathery(enoch) Lathery(enoch) and forall x (Lathery(x) -> Hipped(x)) -> therefore Hipped(enoch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Belva is extensile. Belva is vexed. Noelle is breathing. All vexed things are lithic. If something is extensile and breathing then it is isoclinic. All anopheline things are vexed. If something is vexed then it is isoclinic. Big things are extensile. All anopheline things are breathing. If something is anopheline and isoclinic then it is asserted. If something is isoclinic then it is anopheline. Belva is asserted.", "logic": "\nExtensile(belva)\nVexed(belva)\nBreathing(noelle)\nforall x (Vexed(x) -> Lithic(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) and Breathing(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\nforall x (Anopheline(x) -> Vexed(x))\nforall x (Vexed(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Anopheline(x) -> Breathing(x))\nforall x (Anopheline(x) and Isoclinic(x) -> Asserted(x))\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Anopheline(x))\n\nAsserted(belva)\n\nVexed(belva) and forall x (Vexed(x) -> Isoclinic(x)) -> therefore Isoclinic(belva) Isoclinic(belva) and forall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Anopheline(x)) -> therefore Anopheline(belva) Vexed(belva) and forall x (Vexed(x) -> Isoclinic(x)) -> therefore Isoclinic(belva) Anopheline(belva) and Isoclinic(belva) and forall x (Anopheline(x) and Isoclinic(x) -> Asserted(x)) -> therefore Asserted(belva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Joelly is ambagious. Joelly is bifurcated. Daisy is splintery. All bifurcated things are truant. If something is ambagious and splintery then it is chockful. All blackish things are bifurcated. If something is bifurcated then it is chockful. Big things are ambagious. All blackish things are splintery. If something is blackish and chockful then it is grumous. If something is chockful then it is blackish. Joelly is not grumous.", "logic": "\nAmbagious(joelly)\nBifurcated(joelly)\nSplintery(daisy)\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Truant(x))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) and Splintery(x) -> Chockful(x))\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Bifurcated(x))\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Chockful(x))\nforall x (Chockful(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Splintery(x))\nforall x (Blackish(x) and Chockful(x) -> Grumous(x))\nforall x (Chockful(x) -> Blackish(x))\n\nnot Grumous(joelly)\n\nBifurcated(joelly) and forall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Chockful(x)) -> therefore Chockful(joelly) Chockful(joelly) and forall x (Chockful(x) -> Blackish(x)) -> therefore Blackish(joelly) Bifurcated(joelly) and forall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Chockful(x)) -> therefore Chockful(joelly) Blackish(joelly) and Chockful(joelly) and forall x (Blackish(x) and Chockful(x) -> Grumous(x)) -> therefore Grumous(joelly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Jim is downstairs. Jim is anagogic. Darya is dictated. All anagogic things are penciled. If something is downstairs and dictated then it is immature. All asat things are anagogic. If something is anagogic then it is immature. Big things are downstairs. All asat things are dictated. If something is asat and immature then it is proactive. If something is immature then it is asat. Darya is not asat.", "logic": "\nDownstairs(jim)\nAnagogic(jim)\nDictated(darya)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Penciled(x))\nforall x (Downstairs(x) and Dictated(x) -> Immature(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) -> Anagogic(x))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) -> Immature(x))\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Downstairs(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) -> Dictated(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) and Immature(x) -> Proactive(x))\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Asat(x))\n\nnot Asat(darya)\n\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Asat(x)) <- forall x (Downstairs(x) and Dictated(x) -> Immature(x)) <- forall x (Immature(x) -> Downstairs(x)) <- forall x (Anagogic(x) -> Immature(x)) <- forall x (Asat(x) -> Anagogic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Bryana is moderate. Bryana is measly. Stephanus is encrusted. All measly things are excitant. If something is moderate and encrusted then it is teal. All shod things are measly. If something is measly then it is teal. Big things are moderate. All shod things are encrusted. If something is shod and teal then it is releasing. If something is teal then it is shod. Stephanus is releasing.", "logic": "\nModerate(bryana)\nMeasly(bryana)\nEncrusted(stephanus)\nforall x (Measly(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x) and Encrusted(x) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Shod(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Teal(x) -> Moderate(x))\nforall x (Shod(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Shod(x) and Teal(x) -> Releasing(x))\nforall x (Teal(x) -> Shod(x))\n\nReleasing(stephanus)\n\nforall x (Shod(x) and Teal(x) -> Releasing(x)) <- forall x (Teal(x) -> Shod(x)) <- forall x (Moderate(x) and Encrusted(x) -> Teal(x)) <- forall x (Teal(x) -> Moderate(x)) <- forall x (Measly(x) -> Teal(x)) <- forall x (Shod(x) -> Measly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Albrecht is inward. Albrecht is mismatched. Hattie is saurian. All mismatched things are fogbound. If something is inward and saurian then it is deafening. All insular things are mismatched. If something is mismatched then it is deafening. Big things are inward. All insular things are saurian. If something is insular and deafening then it is static. If something is deafening then it is insular. Hattie is not deafening.", "logic": "\nInward(albrecht)\nMismatched(albrecht)\nSaurian(hattie)\nforall x (Mismatched(x) -> Fogbound(x))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Saurian(x) -> Deafening(x))\nforall x (Insular(x) -> Mismatched(x))\nforall x (Mismatched(x) -> Deafening(x))\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Insular(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Insular(x) and Deafening(x) -> Static(x))\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Insular(x))\n\nnot Deafening(hattie)\n\nforall x (Inward(x) and Saurian(x) -> Deafening(x)) <- forall x (Deafening(x) -> Inward(x)) <- forall x (Mismatched(x) -> Deafening(x)) <- forall x (Insular(x) -> Mismatched(x)) <- forall x (Deafening(x) -> Insular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Stavros is embossed. Stavros is jesuitical. Ellynn is powerful. All jesuitical things are hydric. If something is embossed and powerful then it is patronymic. All pissed things are jesuitical. If something is jesuitical then it is patronymic. Big things are embossed. All pissed things are powerful. If something is pissed and patronymic then it is hempen. If something is patronymic then it is pissed. Ellynn is hydric.", "logic": "\nEmbossed(stavros)\nJesuitical(stavros)\nPowerful(ellynn)\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Hydric(x))\nforall x (Embossed(x) and Powerful(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Pissed(x) -> Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Patronymic(x) -> Embossed(x))\nforall x (Pissed(x) -> Powerful(x))\nforall x (Pissed(x) and Patronymic(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Patronymic(x) -> Pissed(x))\n\nHydric(ellynn)\n\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Hydric(x)) <- forall x (Pissed(x) -> Jesuitical(x)) <- forall x (Patronymic(x) -> Pissed(x)) <- forall x (Embossed(x) and Powerful(x) -> Patronymic(x)) <- forall x (Patronymic(x) -> Embossed(x)) <- forall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Patronymic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Meggie is venetian. Meggie is diseased. Meggie is binominal. Meggie is requested. Fortune is irresolute. Fortune is diseased. Fortune is binomial. Fortune is binominal. Fortune is not requested. Beckie is diseased. Beckie is not binomial. Beckie is binominal. All venetian, unripe things are requested. If something is irresolute and unripe then it is requested. If something is diseased and not binomial then it is venetian. All venetian things are unripe. If something is venetian then it is diseased. If something is venetian and irresolute then it is not diseased. If Meggie is diseased and Meggie is unripe then Meggie is requested. If something is binomial and requested then it is irresolute. Beckie is not binomial.", "logic": "\nVenetian(meggie)\nDiseased(meggie)\nBinominal(meggie)\nRequested(meggie)\nIrresolute(fortune)\nDiseased(fortune)\nBinomial(fortune)\nBinominal(fortune)\nnot Requested(fortune)\nDiseased(beckie)\nnot Binomial(beckie)\nBinominal(beckie)\nforall x (Venetian(x) and Unripe(x) -> Requested(x))\nforall x (Irresolute(x) and Unripe(x) -> Requested(x))\nforall x (Diseased(x) and not Binomial(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) -> Diseased(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) and Irresolute(x) -> not Diseased(x))\nDiseased(meggie) and Unripe(meggie) -> Requested(meggie)\nforall x (Binomial(x) and Requested(x) -> Irresolute(x))\n\nnot Binomial(beckie)\n\ntherefore not Binomial(beckie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Meredeth is squally. Meredeth is transposed. Meredeth is ferial. Meredeth is circadian. Zerk is plaguey. Zerk is transposed. Zerk is uncommon. Zerk is ferial. Zerk is not circadian. Bharat is transposed. Bharat is not uncommon. Bharat is ferial. All squally, nephritic things are circadian. If something is plaguey and nephritic then it is circadian. If something is transposed and not uncommon then it is squally. All squally things are nephritic. If something is squally then it is transposed. If something is squally and plaguey then it is not transposed. If Meredeth is transposed and Meredeth is nephritic then Meredeth is circadian. If something is uncommon and circadian then it is plaguey. Meredeth is not circadian.", "logic": "\nSqually(meredeth)\nTransposed(meredeth)\nFerial(meredeth)\nCircadian(meredeth)\nPlaguey(zerk)\nTransposed(zerk)\nUncommon(zerk)\nFerial(zerk)\nnot Circadian(zerk)\nTransposed(bharat)\nnot Uncommon(bharat)\nFerial(bharat)\nforall x (Squally(x) and Nephritic(x) -> Circadian(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) and Nephritic(x) -> Circadian(x))\nforall x (Transposed(x) and not Uncommon(x) -> Squally(x))\nforall x (Squally(x) -> Nephritic(x))\nforall x (Squally(x) -> Transposed(x))\nforall x (Squally(x) and Plaguey(x) -> not Transposed(x))\nTransposed(meredeth) and Nephritic(meredeth) -> Circadian(meredeth)\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and Circadian(x) -> Plaguey(x))\n\nnot Circadian(meredeth)\n\ntherefore Circadian(meredeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Miguel is pagan. Miguel is gelid. Miguel is pectinate. Miguel is plangent. Dotti is tinpot. Dotti is gelid. Dotti is vulpine. Dotti is pectinate. Dotti is not plangent. Myrlene is gelid. Myrlene is not vulpine. Myrlene is pectinate. All pagan, unfriendly things are plangent. If something is tinpot and unfriendly then it is plangent. If something is gelid and not vulpine then it is pagan. All pagan things are unfriendly. If something is pagan then it is gelid. If something is pagan and tinpot then it is not gelid. If Miguel is gelid and Miguel is unfriendly then Miguel is plangent. If something is vulpine and plangent then it is tinpot. Myrlene is pagan.", "logic": "\nPagan(miguel)\nGelid(miguel)\nPectinate(miguel)\nPlangent(miguel)\nTinpot(dotti)\nGelid(dotti)\nVulpine(dotti)\nPectinate(dotti)\nnot Plangent(dotti)\nGelid(myrlene)\nnot Vulpine(myrlene)\nPectinate(myrlene)\nforall x (Pagan(x) and Unfriendly(x) -> Plangent(x))\nforall x (Tinpot(x) and Unfriendly(x) -> Plangent(x))\nforall x (Gelid(x) and not Vulpine(x) -> Pagan(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) -> Unfriendly(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) and Tinpot(x) -> not Gelid(x))\nGelid(miguel) and Unfriendly(miguel) -> Plangent(miguel)\nforall x (Vulpine(x) and Plangent(x) -> Tinpot(x))\n\nPagan(myrlene)\n\nGelid(myrlene) and not Vulpine(myrlene) and forall x (Gelid(x) and not Vulpine(x) -> Pagan(x)) -> therefore Pagan(myrlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Arabella is cognizable. Arabella is burnished. Arabella is pelagic. Arabella is tarsal. Ephrem is ultimate. Ephrem is burnished. Ephrem is stinting. Ephrem is pelagic. Ephrem is not tarsal. Tyne is burnished. Tyne is not stinting. Tyne is pelagic. All cognizable, annoying things are tarsal. If something is ultimate and annoying then it is tarsal. If something is burnished and not stinting then it is cognizable. All cognizable things are annoying. If something is cognizable then it is burnished. If something is cognizable and ultimate then it is not burnished. If Arabella is burnished and Arabella is annoying then Arabella is tarsal. If something is stinting and tarsal then it is ultimate. Tyne is not cognizable.", "logic": "\nCognizable(arabella)\nBurnished(arabella)\nPelagic(arabella)\nTarsal(arabella)\nUltimate(ephrem)\nBurnished(ephrem)\nStinting(ephrem)\nPelagic(ephrem)\nnot Tarsal(ephrem)\nBurnished(tyne)\nnot Stinting(tyne)\nPelagic(tyne)\nforall x (Cognizable(x) and Annoying(x) -> Tarsal(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) and Annoying(x) -> Tarsal(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and not Stinting(x) -> Cognizable(x))\nforall x (Cognizable(x) -> Annoying(x))\nforall x (Cognizable(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Cognizable(x) and Ultimate(x) -> not Burnished(x))\nBurnished(arabella) and Annoying(arabella) -> Tarsal(arabella)\nforall x (Stinting(x) and Tarsal(x) -> Ultimate(x))\n\nnot Cognizable(tyne)\n\nBurnished(tyne) and not Stinting(tyne) and forall x (Burnished(x) and not Stinting(x) -> Cognizable(x)) -> therefore Cognizable(tyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Krissy is ratable. Krissy is smitten. Krissy is moronic. Krissy is grueling. Shadow is standby. Shadow is smitten. Shadow is nepalese. Shadow is moronic. Shadow is not grueling. Jaimie is smitten. Jaimie is not nepalese. Jaimie is moronic. All ratable, congealed things are grueling. If something is standby and congealed then it is grueling. If something is smitten and not nepalese then it is ratable. All ratable things are congealed. If something is ratable then it is smitten. If something is ratable and standby then it is not smitten. If Krissy is smitten and Krissy is congealed then Krissy is grueling. If something is nepalese and grueling then it is standby. Jaimie is congealed.", "logic": "\nRatable(krissy)\nSmitten(krissy)\nMoronic(krissy)\nGrueling(krissy)\nStandby(shadow)\nSmitten(shadow)\nNepalese(shadow)\nMoronic(shadow)\nnot Grueling(shadow)\nSmitten(jaimie)\nnot Nepalese(jaimie)\nMoronic(jaimie)\nforall x (Ratable(x) and Congealed(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Standby(x) and Congealed(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Smitten(x) and not Nepalese(x) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> Congealed(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> Smitten(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) and Standby(x) -> not Smitten(x))\nSmitten(krissy) and Congealed(krissy) -> Grueling(krissy)\nforall x (Nepalese(x) and Grueling(x) -> Standby(x))\n\nCongealed(jaimie)\n\nSmitten(jaimie) and not Nepalese(jaimie) and forall x (Smitten(x) and not Nepalese(x) -> Ratable(x)) -> therefore Ratable(jaimie) Ratable(jaimie) and forall x (Ratable(x) -> Congealed(x)) -> therefore Congealed(jaimie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Daffi is untypical. Daffi is anaemic. Daffi is linelike. Daffi is canopied. Gino is desultory. Gino is anaemic. Gino is teetotal. Gino is linelike. Gino is not canopied. Thalia is anaemic. Thalia is not teetotal. Thalia is linelike. All untypical, theistic things are canopied. If something is desultory and theistic then it is canopied. If something is anaemic and not teetotal then it is untypical. All untypical things are theistic. If something is untypical then it is anaemic. If something is untypical and desultory then it is not anaemic. If Daffi is anaemic and Daffi is theistic then Daffi is canopied. If something is teetotal and canopied then it is desultory. Thalia is not theistic.", "logic": "\nUntypical(daffi)\nAnaemic(daffi)\nLinelike(daffi)\nCanopied(daffi)\nDesultory(gino)\nAnaemic(gino)\nTeetotal(gino)\nLinelike(gino)\nnot Canopied(gino)\nAnaemic(thalia)\nnot Teetotal(thalia)\nLinelike(thalia)\nforall x (Untypical(x) and Theistic(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Desultory(x) and Theistic(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) and not Teetotal(x) -> Untypical(x))\nforall x (Untypical(x) -> Theistic(x))\nforall x (Untypical(x) -> Anaemic(x))\nforall x (Untypical(x) and Desultory(x) -> not Anaemic(x))\nAnaemic(daffi) and Theistic(daffi) -> Canopied(daffi)\nforall x (Teetotal(x) and Canopied(x) -> Desultory(x))\n\nnot Theistic(thalia)\n\nAnaemic(thalia) and not Teetotal(thalia) and forall x (Anaemic(x) and not Teetotal(x) -> Untypical(x)) -> therefore Untypical(thalia) Untypical(thalia) and forall x (Untypical(x) -> Theistic(x)) -> therefore Theistic(thalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Averyl is bahamian. Averyl is tattered. Averyl is comburant. Averyl is helminthic. Sturgis is voluptuous. Sturgis is tattered. Sturgis is noseless. Sturgis is comburant. Sturgis is not helminthic. Noel is tattered. Noel is not noseless. Noel is comburant. All bahamian, eccentric things are helminthic. If something is voluptuous and eccentric then it is helminthic. If something is tattered and not noseless then it is bahamian. All bahamian things are eccentric. If something is bahamian then it is tattered. If something is bahamian and voluptuous then it is not tattered. If Averyl is tattered and Averyl is eccentric then Averyl is helminthic. If something is noseless and helminthic then it is voluptuous. Noel is helminthic.", "logic": "\nBahamian(averyl)\nTattered(averyl)\nComburant(averyl)\nHelminthic(averyl)\nVoluptuous(sturgis)\nTattered(sturgis)\nNoseless(sturgis)\nComburant(sturgis)\nnot Helminthic(sturgis)\nTattered(noel)\nnot Noseless(noel)\nComburant(noel)\nforall x (Bahamian(x) and Eccentric(x) -> Helminthic(x))\nforall x (Voluptuous(x) and Eccentric(x) -> Helminthic(x))\nforall x (Tattered(x) and not Noseless(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Eccentric(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Tattered(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) and Voluptuous(x) -> not Tattered(x))\nTattered(averyl) and Eccentric(averyl) -> Helminthic(averyl)\nforall x (Noseless(x) and Helminthic(x) -> Voluptuous(x))\n\nHelminthic(noel)\n\nTattered(noel) and not Noseless(noel) and forall x (Tattered(x) and not Noseless(x) -> Bahamian(x)) -> therefore Bahamian(noel) Tattered(noel) and not Noseless(noel) and forall x (Tattered(x) and not Noseless(x) -> Bahamian(x)) -> therefore Bahamian(noel) Bahamian(noel) and forall x (Bahamian(x) -> Eccentric(x)) -> therefore Eccentric(noel) Bahamian(noel) and Eccentric(noel) and forall x (Bahamian(x) and Eccentric(x) -> Helminthic(x)) -> therefore Helminthic(noel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Edsel is through. Edsel is widespread. Edsel is cuspated. Edsel is exact. Curtis is zymotic. Curtis is widespread. Curtis is octagonal. Curtis is cuspated. Curtis is not exact. Ronni is widespread. Ronni is not octagonal. Ronni is cuspated. All through, pouring things are exact. If something is zymotic and pouring then it is exact. If something is widespread and not octagonal then it is through. All through things are pouring. If something is through then it is widespread. If something is through and zymotic then it is not widespread. If Edsel is widespread and Edsel is pouring then Edsel is exact. If something is octagonal and exact then it is zymotic. Ronni is not exact.", "logic": "\nThrough(edsel)\nWidespread(edsel)\nCuspated(edsel)\nExact(edsel)\nZymotic(curtis)\nWidespread(curtis)\nOctagonal(curtis)\nCuspated(curtis)\nnot Exact(curtis)\nWidespread(ronni)\nnot Octagonal(ronni)\nCuspated(ronni)\nforall x (Through(x) and Pouring(x) -> Exact(x))\nforall x (Zymotic(x) and Pouring(x) -> Exact(x))\nforall x (Widespread(x) and not Octagonal(x) -> Through(x))\nforall x (Through(x) -> Pouring(x))\nforall x (Through(x) -> Widespread(x))\nforall x (Through(x) and Zymotic(x) -> not Widespread(x))\nWidespread(edsel) and Pouring(edsel) -> Exact(edsel)\nforall x (Octagonal(x) and Exact(x) -> Zymotic(x))\n\nnot Exact(ronni)\n\nWidespread(ronni) and not Octagonal(ronni) and forall x (Widespread(x) and not Octagonal(x) -> Through(x)) -> therefore Through(ronni) Widespread(ronni) and not Octagonal(ronni) and forall x (Widespread(x) and not Octagonal(x) -> Through(x)) -> therefore Through(ronni) Through(ronni) and forall x (Through(x) -> Pouring(x)) -> therefore Pouring(ronni) Through(ronni) and Pouring(ronni) and forall x (Through(x) and Pouring(x) -> Exact(x)) -> therefore Exact(ronni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Joyann is bibulous. Joyann is lxxvi. Joyann is legitimate. Joyann is packaged. Charleton is redheaded. Charleton is lxxvi. Charleton is mesolithic. Charleton is legitimate. Charleton is not packaged. Rosaline is lxxvi. Rosaline is not mesolithic. Rosaline is legitimate. All bibulous, aromatic things are packaged. If something is redheaded and aromatic then it is packaged. If something is lxxvi and not mesolithic then it is bibulous. All bibulous things are aromatic. If something is bibulous then it is lxxvi. If something is bibulous and redheaded then it is not lxxvi. If Joyann is lxxvi and Joyann is aromatic then Joyann is packaged. If something is mesolithic and packaged then it is redheaded. Charleton is not aromatic.", "logic": "\nBibulous(joyann)\nLxxvi(joyann)\nLegitimate(joyann)\nPackaged(joyann)\nRedheaded(charleton)\nLxxvi(charleton)\nMesolithic(charleton)\nLegitimate(charleton)\nnot Packaged(charleton)\nLxxvi(rosaline)\nnot Mesolithic(rosaline)\nLegitimate(rosaline)\nforall x (Bibulous(x) and Aromatic(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Redheaded(x) and Aromatic(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) and not Mesolithic(x) -> Bibulous(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) -> Aromatic(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) and Redheaded(x) -> not Lxxvi(x))\nLxxvi(joyann) and Aromatic(joyann) -> Packaged(joyann)\nforall x (Mesolithic(x) and Packaged(x) -> Redheaded(x))\n\nnot Aromatic(charleton)\n\nforall x (Bibulous(x) -> Aromatic(x)) <- forall x (Lxxvi(x) and not Mesolithic(x) -> Bibulous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Paola is dalmatian. Paola is lacerated. Paola is sleeveless. Paola is julian. Marry is prandial. Marry is lacerated. Marry is noticeable. Marry is sleeveless. Marry is not julian. Poppy is lacerated. Poppy is not noticeable. Poppy is sleeveless. All dalmatian, anodal things are julian. If something is prandial and anodal then it is julian. If something is lacerated and not noticeable then it is dalmatian. All dalmatian things are anodal. If something is dalmatian then it is lacerated. If something is dalmatian and prandial then it is not lacerated. If Paola is lacerated and Paola is anodal then Paola is julian. If something is noticeable and julian then it is prandial. Poppy is prandial.", "logic": "\nDalmatian(paola)\nLacerated(paola)\nSleeveless(paola)\nJulian(paola)\nPrandial(marry)\nLacerated(marry)\nNoticeable(marry)\nSleeveless(marry)\nnot Julian(marry)\nLacerated(poppy)\nnot Noticeable(poppy)\nSleeveless(poppy)\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) and Anodal(x) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) and Anodal(x) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Lacerated(x) and not Noticeable(x) -> Dalmatian(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) -> Anodal(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) -> Lacerated(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) and Prandial(x) -> not Lacerated(x))\nLacerated(paola) and Anodal(paola) -> Julian(paola)\nforall x (Noticeable(x) and Julian(x) -> Prandial(x))\n\nPrandial(poppy)\n\nforall x (Noticeable(x) and Julian(x) -> Prandial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Amalea is present. Amalea is nineteenth. Amalea is bombproof. Amalea is august. Wrennie is inventive. Wrennie is nineteenth. Wrennie is lienal. Wrennie is bombproof. Wrennie is not august. Gael is nineteenth. Gael is not lienal. Gael is bombproof. All present, shot things are august. If something is inventive and shot then it is august. If something is nineteenth and not lienal then it is present. All present things are shot. If something is present then it is nineteenth. If something is present and inventive then it is not nineteenth. If Amalea is nineteenth and Amalea is shot then Amalea is august. If something is lienal and august then it is inventive. Wrennie is not present.", "logic": "\nPresent(amalea)\nNineteenth(amalea)\nBombproof(amalea)\nAugust(amalea)\nInventive(wrennie)\nNineteenth(wrennie)\nLienal(wrennie)\nBombproof(wrennie)\nnot August(wrennie)\nNineteenth(gael)\nnot Lienal(gael)\nBombproof(gael)\nforall x (Present(x) and Shot(x) -> August(x))\nforall x (Inventive(x) and Shot(x) -> August(x))\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) and not Lienal(x) -> Present(x))\nforall x (Present(x) -> Shot(x))\nforall x (Present(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Present(x) and Inventive(x) -> not Nineteenth(x))\nNineteenth(amalea) and Shot(amalea) -> August(amalea)\nforall x (Lienal(x) and August(x) -> Inventive(x))\n\nnot Present(wrennie)\n\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) and not Lienal(x) -> Present(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Avivah is sassy. Avivah is pakistani. Avivah is damning. Avivah is lush. Reginauld is thrombosed. Reginauld is pakistani. Reginauld is extended. Reginauld is damning. Reginauld is not lush. Yevette is pakistani. Yevette is not extended. Yevette is damning. All sassy, linelike things are lush. If something is thrombosed and linelike then it is lush. If something is pakistani and not extended then it is sassy. All sassy things are linelike. If something is sassy then it is pakistani. If something is sassy and thrombosed then it is not pakistani. If Avivah is pakistani and Avivah is linelike then Avivah is lush. If something is extended and lush then it is thrombosed. Avivah is thrombosed.", "logic": "\nSassy(avivah)\nPakistani(avivah)\nDamning(avivah)\nLush(avivah)\nThrombosed(reginauld)\nPakistani(reginauld)\nExtended(reginauld)\nDamning(reginauld)\nnot Lush(reginauld)\nPakistani(yevette)\nnot Extended(yevette)\nDamning(yevette)\nforall x (Sassy(x) and Linelike(x) -> Lush(x))\nforall x (Thrombosed(x) and Linelike(x) -> Lush(x))\nforall x (Pakistani(x) and not Extended(x) -> Sassy(x))\nforall x (Sassy(x) -> Linelike(x))\nforall x (Sassy(x) -> Pakistani(x))\nforall x (Sassy(x) and Thrombosed(x) -> not Pakistani(x))\nPakistani(avivah) and Linelike(avivah) -> Lush(avivah)\nforall x (Extended(x) and Lush(x) -> Thrombosed(x))\n\nThrombosed(avivah)\n\nforall x (Extended(x) and Lush(x) -> Thrombosed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Quillan is abulic. Quillan is bedded. Quillan is algometric. If Quillan is abulic and Quillan is directed then Quillan is elliptical. Furry people are apterous. If someone is directed and not bedded then they are algometric. Green, apterous people are algometric. If someone is scrimpy then they are not directed. Young, bedded people are directed. Quillan is abulic.", "logic": "\nAbulic(quillan)\nBedded(quillan)\nAlgometric(quillan)\nAbulic(quillan) and Directed(quillan) -> Elliptical(quillan)\nforall x (Elliptical(x) -> Apterous(x))\nforall x (Directed(x) and not Bedded(x) -> Algometric(x))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) and Apterous(x) -> Algometric(x))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) -> not Directed(x))\nforall x (Algometric(x) and Bedded(x) -> Directed(x))\n\nAbulic(quillan)\n\ntherefore Abulic(quillan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Maryl is spry. Maryl is vulpecular. Maryl is risky. If Maryl is spry and Maryl is myelinated then Maryl is equivocal. Furry people are streaming. If someone is myelinated and not vulpecular then they are risky. Green, streaming people are risky. If someone is beholden then they are not myelinated. Young, vulpecular people are myelinated. Maryl is not risky.", "logic": "\nSpry(maryl)\nVulpecular(maryl)\nRisky(maryl)\nSpry(maryl) and Myelinated(maryl) -> Equivocal(maryl)\nforall x (Equivocal(x) -> Streaming(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and not Vulpecular(x) -> Risky(x))\nforall x (Beholden(x) and Streaming(x) -> Risky(x))\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> not Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Risky(x) and Vulpecular(x) -> Myelinated(x))\n\nnot Risky(maryl)\n\ntherefore Risky(maryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Titos is soured. Titos is earthy. Titos is reliable. If Titos is soured and Titos is lxxiii then Titos is unearned. Furry people are saddled. If someone is lxxiii and not earthy then they are reliable. Green, saddled people are reliable. If someone is skeptical then they are not lxxiii. Young, earthy people are lxxiii. Titos is lxxiii.", "logic": "\nSoured(titos)\nEarthy(titos)\nReliable(titos)\nSoured(titos) and Lxxiii(titos) -> Unearned(titos)\nforall x (Unearned(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and not Earthy(x) -> Reliable(x))\nforall x (Skeptical(x) and Saddled(x) -> Reliable(x))\nforall x (Skeptical(x) -> not Lxxiii(x))\nforall x (Reliable(x) and Earthy(x) -> Lxxiii(x))\n\nLxxiii(titos)\n\nReliable(titos) and Earthy(titos) and forall x (Reliable(x) and Earthy(x) -> Lxxiii(x)) -> therefore Lxxiii(titos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Amalie is crank. Amalie is modal. Amalie is automated. If Amalie is crank and Amalie is unpackaged then Amalie is pedantic. Furry people are admonitory. If someone is unpackaged and not modal then they are automated. Green, admonitory people are automated. If someone is syndetic then they are not unpackaged. Young, modal people are unpackaged. Amalie is not unpackaged.", "logic": "\nCrank(amalie)\nModal(amalie)\nAutomated(amalie)\nCrank(amalie) and Unpackaged(amalie) -> Pedantic(amalie)\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Admonitory(x))\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) and not Modal(x) -> Automated(x))\nforall x (Syndetic(x) and Admonitory(x) -> Automated(x))\nforall x (Syndetic(x) -> not Unpackaged(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Modal(x) -> Unpackaged(x))\n\nnot Unpackaged(amalie)\n\nAutomated(amalie) and Modal(amalie) and forall x (Automated(x) and Modal(x) -> Unpackaged(x)) -> therefore Unpackaged(amalie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Trenna is orbicular. Trenna is akimbo. Trenna is zairean. If Trenna is orbicular and Trenna is tonsorial then Trenna is urceolate. Furry people are sounding. If someone is tonsorial and not akimbo then they are zairean. Green, sounding people are zairean. If someone is overripe then they are not tonsorial. Young, akimbo people are tonsorial. Trenna is urceolate.", "logic": "\nOrbicular(trenna)\nAkimbo(trenna)\nZairean(trenna)\nOrbicular(trenna) and Tonsorial(trenna) -> Urceolate(trenna)\nforall x (Urceolate(x) -> Sounding(x))\nforall x (Tonsorial(x) and not Akimbo(x) -> Zairean(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) and Sounding(x) -> Zairean(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> not Tonsorial(x))\nforall x (Zairean(x) and Akimbo(x) -> Tonsorial(x))\n\nUrceolate(trenna)\n\nZairean(trenna) and Akimbo(trenna) and forall x (Zairean(x) and Akimbo(x) -> Tonsorial(x)) -> therefore Tonsorial(trenna) Orbicular(trenna) and Tonsorial(trenna) and Orbicular(trenna) and Tonsorial(trenna) -> Urceolate(trenna) -> therefore Urceolate(trenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Sheelagh is laputan. Sheelagh is balzacian. Sheelagh is hasty. If Sheelagh is laputan and Sheelagh is nervous then Sheelagh is sunk. Furry people are dreadful. If someone is nervous and not balzacian then they are hasty. Green, dreadful people are hasty. If someone is menial then they are not nervous. Young, balzacian people are nervous. Sheelagh is not sunk.", "logic": "\nLaputan(sheelagh)\nBalzacian(sheelagh)\nHasty(sheelagh)\nLaputan(sheelagh) and Nervous(sheelagh) -> Sunk(sheelagh)\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Dreadful(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) and not Balzacian(x) -> Hasty(x))\nforall x (Menial(x) and Dreadful(x) -> Hasty(x))\nforall x (Menial(x) -> not Nervous(x))\nforall x (Hasty(x) and Balzacian(x) -> Nervous(x))\n\nnot Sunk(sheelagh)\n\nHasty(sheelagh) and Balzacian(sheelagh) and forall x (Hasty(x) and Balzacian(x) -> Nervous(x)) -> therefore Nervous(sheelagh) Laputan(sheelagh) and Nervous(sheelagh) and Laputan(sheelagh) and Nervous(sheelagh) -> Sunk(sheelagh) -> therefore Sunk(sheelagh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Pepito is activating. Pepito is negligent. Pepito is spiral. If Pepito is activating and Pepito is endurable then Pepito is denary. Furry people are pacifistic. If someone is endurable and not negligent then they are spiral. Green, pacifistic people are spiral. If someone is cranky then they are not endurable. Young, negligent people are endurable. Pepito is pacifistic.", "logic": "\nActivating(pepito)\nNegligent(pepito)\nSpiral(pepito)\nActivating(pepito) and Endurable(pepito) -> Denary(pepito)\nforall x (Denary(x) -> Pacifistic(x))\nforall x (Endurable(x) and not Negligent(x) -> Spiral(x))\nforall x (Cranky(x) and Pacifistic(x) -> Spiral(x))\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> not Endurable(x))\nforall x (Spiral(x) and Negligent(x) -> Endurable(x))\n\nPacifistic(pepito)\n\nSpiral(pepito) and Negligent(pepito) and forall x (Spiral(x) and Negligent(x) -> Endurable(x)) -> therefore Endurable(pepito) Activating(pepito) and Endurable(pepito) and Activating(pepito) and Endurable(pepito) -> Denary(pepito) -> therefore Denary(pepito) Denary(pepito) and forall x (Denary(x) -> Pacifistic(x)) -> therefore Pacifistic(pepito)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Pate is touched. Pate is adipose. Pate is thoracic. If Pate is touched and Pate is sunken then Pate is cadenced. Furry people are pyemic. If someone is sunken and not adipose then they are thoracic. Green, pyemic people are thoracic. If someone is stocky then they are not sunken. Young, adipose people are sunken. Pate is not pyemic.", "logic": "\nTouched(pate)\nAdipose(pate)\nThoracic(pate)\nTouched(pate) and Sunken(pate) -> Cadenced(pate)\nforall x (Cadenced(x) -> Pyemic(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) and not Adipose(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Stocky(x) and Pyemic(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> not Sunken(x))\nforall x (Thoracic(x) and Adipose(x) -> Sunken(x))\n\nnot Pyemic(pate)\n\nThoracic(pate) and Adipose(pate) and forall x (Thoracic(x) and Adipose(x) -> Sunken(x)) -> therefore Sunken(pate) Touched(pate) and Sunken(pate) and Touched(pate) and Sunken(pate) -> Cadenced(pate) -> therefore Cadenced(pate) Cadenced(pate) and forall x (Cadenced(x) -> Pyemic(x)) -> therefore Pyemic(pate)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Terrie is not heterodyne. Terrie is noncausal. Velvet is heterodyne. Velvet is bolivian. Velvet is trichrome. Velvet is needful. Heidie is heterodox. Heidie is trichrome. Thebault is not noncausal. Thebault is trichrome. Thebault is needful. Thebault is stylish. If Terrie is heterodyne then Terrie is trichrome. Big, bolivian people are heterodyne. If someone is needful then they are trichrome. If Thebault is not stylish and Thebault is not heterodyne then Thebault is noncausal. If Terrie is trichrome then Terrie is stylish. Red, stylish people are not noncausal. All heterodyne people are needful. If someone is noncausal then they are needful. Velvet is trichrome.", "logic": "\nnot Heterodyne(terrie)\nNoncausal(terrie)\nHeterodyne(velvet)\nBolivian(velvet)\nTrichrome(velvet)\nNeedful(velvet)\nHeterodox(heidie)\nTrichrome(heidie)\nnot Noncausal(thebault)\nTrichrome(thebault)\nNeedful(thebault)\nStylish(thebault)\nHeterodyne(terrie) -> Trichrome(terrie)\nforall x (Heterodox(x) and Bolivian(x) -> Heterodyne(x))\nforall x (Needful(x) -> Trichrome(x))\nnot Stylish(thebault) and not Heterodyne(thebault) -> Noncausal(thebault)\nTrichrome(terrie) -> Stylish(terrie)\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Stylish(x) -> not Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Heterodyne(x) -> Needful(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Needful(x))\n\nTrichrome(velvet)\n\ntherefore Trichrome(velvet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Whitaker is not twelve. Whitaker is sighted. Dinny is twelve. Dinny is pixilated. Dinny is tinseled. Dinny is winning. Fritz is mismated. Fritz is tinseled. Garv is not sighted. Garv is tinseled. Garv is winning. Garv is lithesome. If Whitaker is twelve then Whitaker is tinseled. Big, pixilated people are twelve. If someone is winning then they are tinseled. If Garv is not lithesome and Garv is not twelve then Garv is sighted. If Whitaker is tinseled then Whitaker is lithesome. Red, lithesome people are not sighted. All twelve people are winning. If someone is sighted then they are winning. Whitaker is twelve.", "logic": "\nnot Twelve(whitaker)\nSighted(whitaker)\nTwelve(dinny)\nPixilated(dinny)\nTinseled(dinny)\nWinning(dinny)\nMismated(fritz)\nTinseled(fritz)\nnot Sighted(garv)\nTinseled(garv)\nWinning(garv)\nLithesome(garv)\nTwelve(whitaker) -> Tinseled(whitaker)\nforall x (Mismated(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Tinseled(x))\nnot Lithesome(garv) and not Twelve(garv) -> Sighted(garv)\nTinseled(whitaker) -> Lithesome(whitaker)\nforall x (Pixilated(x) and Lithesome(x) -> not Sighted(x))\nforall x (Twelve(x) -> Winning(x))\nforall x (Sighted(x) -> Winning(x))\n\nTwelve(whitaker)\n\ntherefore not Twelve(whitaker)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Kippie is not aneurismal. Kippie is florid. Aloysius is aneurismal. Aloysius is dotty. Aloysius is swingeing. Aloysius is pyknic. Vikkie is vaginal. Vikkie is swingeing. Rob is not florid. Rob is swingeing. Rob is pyknic. Rob is delible. If Kippie is aneurismal then Kippie is swingeing. Big, dotty people are aneurismal. If someone is pyknic then they are swingeing. If Rob is not delible and Rob is not aneurismal then Rob is florid. If Kippie is swingeing then Kippie is delible. Red, delible people are not florid. All aneurismal people are pyknic. If someone is florid then they are pyknic. Kippie is pyknic.", "logic": "\nnot Aneurismal(kippie)\nFlorid(kippie)\nAneurismal(aloysius)\nDotty(aloysius)\nSwingeing(aloysius)\nPyknic(aloysius)\nVaginal(vikkie)\nSwingeing(vikkie)\nnot Florid(rob)\nSwingeing(rob)\nPyknic(rob)\nDelible(rob)\nAneurismal(kippie) -> Swingeing(kippie)\nforall x (Vaginal(x) and Dotty(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\nforall x (Pyknic(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nnot Delible(rob) and not Aneurismal(rob) -> Florid(rob)\nSwingeing(kippie) -> Delible(kippie)\nforall x (Dotty(x) and Delible(x) -> not Florid(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Pyknic(x))\nforall x (Florid(x) -> Pyknic(x))\n\nPyknic(kippie)\n\nFlorid(kippie) and forall x (Florid(x) -> Pyknic(x)) -> therefore Pyknic(kippie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Hagen is not nodding. Hagen is occipital. Pip is nodding. Pip is unanswered. Pip is discrete. Pip is knifelike. Benedicta is preanal. Benedicta is discrete. Dorette is not occipital. Dorette is discrete. Dorette is knifelike. Dorette is siouan. If Hagen is nodding then Hagen is discrete. Big, unanswered people are nodding. If someone is knifelike then they are discrete. If Dorette is not siouan and Dorette is not nodding then Dorette is occipital. If Hagen is discrete then Hagen is siouan. Red, siouan people are not occipital. All nodding people are knifelike. If someone is occipital then they are knifelike. Hagen is not knifelike.", "logic": "\nnot Nodding(hagen)\nOccipital(hagen)\nNodding(pip)\nUnanswered(pip)\nDiscrete(pip)\nKnifelike(pip)\nPreanal(benedicta)\nDiscrete(benedicta)\nnot Occipital(dorette)\nDiscrete(dorette)\nKnifelike(dorette)\nSiouan(dorette)\nNodding(hagen) -> Discrete(hagen)\nforall x (Preanal(x) and Unanswered(x) -> Nodding(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Discrete(x))\nnot Siouan(dorette) and not Nodding(dorette) -> Occipital(dorette)\nDiscrete(hagen) -> Siouan(hagen)\nforall x (Unanswered(x) and Siouan(x) -> not Occipital(x))\nforall x (Nodding(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Occipital(x) -> Knifelike(x))\n\nnot Knifelike(hagen)\n\nOccipital(hagen) and forall x (Occipital(x) -> Knifelike(x)) -> therefore Knifelike(hagen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Alicia is not uninviting. Alicia is travelled. Dwight is uninviting. Dwight is bulbed. Dwight is nidifugous. Dwight is finespun. Dawson is unobserved. Dawson is nidifugous. Logan is not travelled. Logan is nidifugous. Logan is finespun. Logan is natty. If Alicia is uninviting then Alicia is nidifugous. Big, bulbed people are uninviting. If someone is finespun then they are nidifugous. If Logan is not natty and Logan is not uninviting then Logan is travelled. If Alicia is nidifugous then Alicia is natty. Red, natty people are not travelled. All uninviting people are finespun. If someone is travelled then they are finespun. Alicia is nidifugous.", "logic": "\nnot Uninviting(alicia)\nTravelled(alicia)\nUninviting(dwight)\nBulbed(dwight)\nNidifugous(dwight)\nFinespun(dwight)\nUnobserved(dawson)\nNidifugous(dawson)\nnot Travelled(logan)\nNidifugous(logan)\nFinespun(logan)\nNatty(logan)\nUninviting(alicia) -> Nidifugous(alicia)\nforall x (Unobserved(x) and Bulbed(x) -> Uninviting(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) -> Nidifugous(x))\nnot Natty(logan) and not Uninviting(logan) -> Travelled(logan)\nNidifugous(alicia) -> Natty(alicia)\nforall x (Bulbed(x) and Natty(x) -> not Travelled(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> Finespun(x))\nforall x (Travelled(x) -> Finespun(x))\n\nNidifugous(alicia)\n\nTravelled(alicia) and forall x (Travelled(x) -> Finespun(x)) -> therefore Finespun(alicia) Finespun(alicia) and forall x (Finespun(x) -> Nidifugous(x)) -> therefore Nidifugous(alicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Jefferey is not semiliquid. Jefferey is burrlike. Renato is semiliquid. Renato is ratlike. Renato is marxist. Renato is chummy. Gratiana is browned. Gratiana is marxist. Ximenez is not burrlike. Ximenez is marxist. Ximenez is chummy. Ximenez is eremitic. If Jefferey is semiliquid then Jefferey is marxist. Big, ratlike people are semiliquid. If someone is chummy then they are marxist. If Ximenez is not eremitic and Ximenez is not semiliquid then Ximenez is burrlike. If Jefferey is marxist then Jefferey is eremitic. Red, eremitic people are not burrlike. All semiliquid people are chummy. If someone is burrlike then they are chummy. Jefferey is not marxist.", "logic": "\nnot Semiliquid(jefferey)\nBurrlike(jefferey)\nSemiliquid(renato)\nRatlike(renato)\nMarxist(renato)\nChummy(renato)\nBrowned(gratiana)\nMarxist(gratiana)\nnot Burrlike(ximenez)\nMarxist(ximenez)\nChummy(ximenez)\nEremitic(ximenez)\nSemiliquid(jefferey) -> Marxist(jefferey)\nforall x (Browned(x) and Ratlike(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Marxist(x))\nnot Eremitic(ximenez) and not Semiliquid(ximenez) -> Burrlike(ximenez)\nMarxist(jefferey) -> Eremitic(jefferey)\nforall x (Ratlike(x) and Eremitic(x) -> not Burrlike(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) -> Chummy(x))\n\nnot Marxist(jefferey)\n\nBurrlike(jefferey) and forall x (Burrlike(x) -> Chummy(x)) -> therefore Chummy(jefferey) Chummy(jefferey) and forall x (Chummy(x) -> Marxist(x)) -> therefore Marxist(jefferey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Luke is not seamed. Luke is fazed. Friedric is seamed. Friedric is scurrilous. Friedric is flighty. Friedric is vaned. Lavena is witting. Lavena is flighty. Jewell is not fazed. Jewell is flighty. Jewell is vaned. Jewell is pedagogic. If Luke is seamed then Luke is flighty. Big, scurrilous people are seamed. If someone is vaned then they are flighty. If Jewell is not pedagogic and Jewell is not seamed then Jewell is fazed. If Luke is flighty then Luke is pedagogic. Red, pedagogic people are not fazed. All seamed people are vaned. If someone is fazed then they are vaned. Luke is pedagogic.", "logic": "\nnot Seamed(luke)\nFazed(luke)\nSeamed(friedric)\nScurrilous(friedric)\nFlighty(friedric)\nVaned(friedric)\nWitting(lavena)\nFlighty(lavena)\nnot Fazed(jewell)\nFlighty(jewell)\nVaned(jewell)\nPedagogic(jewell)\nSeamed(luke) -> Flighty(luke)\nforall x (Witting(x) and Scurrilous(x) -> Seamed(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) -> Flighty(x))\nnot Pedagogic(jewell) and not Seamed(jewell) -> Fazed(jewell)\nFlighty(luke) -> Pedagogic(luke)\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) and Pedagogic(x) -> not Fazed(x))\nforall x (Seamed(x) -> Vaned(x))\nforall x (Fazed(x) -> Vaned(x))\n\nPedagogic(luke)\n\nFazed(luke) and forall x (Fazed(x) -> Vaned(x)) -> therefore Vaned(luke) Vaned(luke) and forall x (Vaned(x) -> Flighty(x)) -> therefore Flighty(luke) Flighty(luke) and Flighty(luke) -> Pedagogic(luke) -> therefore Pedagogic(luke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Netta is not articulate. Netta is azotic. Tiffanie is articulate. Tiffanie is zero. Tiffanie is marshy. Tiffanie is gladdened. Esma is glimmery. Esma is marshy. Rene is not azotic. Rene is marshy. Rene is gladdened. Rene is seasonable. If Netta is articulate then Netta is marshy. Big, zero people are articulate. If someone is gladdened then they are marshy. If Rene is not seasonable and Rene is not articulate then Rene is azotic. If Netta is marshy then Netta is seasonable. Red, seasonable people are not azotic. All articulate people are gladdened. If someone is azotic then they are gladdened. Netta is not seasonable.", "logic": "\nnot Articulate(netta)\nAzotic(netta)\nArticulate(tiffanie)\nZero(tiffanie)\nMarshy(tiffanie)\nGladdened(tiffanie)\nGlimmery(esma)\nMarshy(esma)\nnot Azotic(rene)\nMarshy(rene)\nGladdened(rene)\nSeasonable(rene)\nArticulate(netta) -> Marshy(netta)\nforall x (Glimmery(x) and Zero(x) -> Articulate(x))\nforall x (Gladdened(x) -> Marshy(x))\nnot Seasonable(rene) and not Articulate(rene) -> Azotic(rene)\nMarshy(netta) -> Seasonable(netta)\nforall x (Zero(x) and Seasonable(x) -> not Azotic(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x) -> Gladdened(x))\nforall x (Azotic(x) -> Gladdened(x))\n\nnot Seasonable(netta)\n\nAzotic(netta) and forall x (Azotic(x) -> Gladdened(x)) -> therefore Gladdened(netta) Gladdened(netta) and forall x (Gladdened(x) -> Marshy(x)) -> therefore Marshy(netta) Marshy(netta) and Marshy(netta) -> Seasonable(netta) -> therefore Seasonable(netta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Brietta is not inducive. Brietta is pitiless. Dario is inducive. Dario is testaceous. Dario is sanitized. Dario is unquotable. Melanie is exogamic. Melanie is sanitized. Giancarlo is not pitiless. Giancarlo is sanitized. Giancarlo is unquotable. Giancarlo is sandalled. If Brietta is inducive then Brietta is sanitized. Big, testaceous people are inducive. If someone is unquotable then they are sanitized. If Giancarlo is not sandalled and Giancarlo is not inducive then Giancarlo is pitiless. If Brietta is sanitized then Brietta is sandalled. Red, sandalled people are not pitiless. All inducive people are unquotable. If someone is pitiless then they are unquotable. Giancarlo is not inducive.", "logic": "\nnot Inducive(brietta)\nPitiless(brietta)\nInducive(dario)\nTestaceous(dario)\nSanitized(dario)\nUnquotable(dario)\nExogamic(melanie)\nSanitized(melanie)\nnot Pitiless(giancarlo)\nSanitized(giancarlo)\nUnquotable(giancarlo)\nSandalled(giancarlo)\nInducive(brietta) -> Sanitized(brietta)\nforall x (Exogamic(x) and Testaceous(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Unquotable(x) -> Sanitized(x))\nnot Sandalled(giancarlo) and not Inducive(giancarlo) -> Pitiless(giancarlo)\nSanitized(brietta) -> Sandalled(brietta)\nforall x (Testaceous(x) and Sandalled(x) -> not Pitiless(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) -> Unquotable(x))\nforall x (Pitiless(x) -> Unquotable(x))\n\nnot Inducive(giancarlo)\n\nforall x (Exogamic(x) and Testaceous(x) -> Inducive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Dyna is not resinlike. Dyna is advanced. Len is resinlike. Len is morose. Len is dead. Len is branded. Ollie is tasty. Ollie is dead. Cathlene is not advanced. Cathlene is dead. Cathlene is branded. Cathlene is diminished. If Dyna is resinlike then Dyna is dead. Big, morose people are resinlike. If someone is branded then they are dead. If Cathlene is not diminished and Cathlene is not resinlike then Cathlene is advanced. If Dyna is dead then Dyna is diminished. Red, diminished people are not advanced. All resinlike people are branded. If someone is advanced then they are branded. Ollie is branded.", "logic": "\nnot Resinlike(dyna)\nAdvanced(dyna)\nResinlike(len)\nMorose(len)\nDead(len)\nBranded(len)\nTasty(ollie)\nDead(ollie)\nnot Advanced(cathlene)\nDead(cathlene)\nBranded(cathlene)\nDiminished(cathlene)\nResinlike(dyna) -> Dead(dyna)\nforall x (Tasty(x) and Morose(x) -> Resinlike(x))\nforall x (Branded(x) -> Dead(x))\nnot Diminished(cathlene) and not Resinlike(cathlene) -> Advanced(cathlene)\nDead(dyna) -> Diminished(dyna)\nforall x (Morose(x) and Diminished(x) -> not Advanced(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Branded(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Branded(x))\n\nBranded(ollie)\n\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Branded(x)) <- forall x (Tasty(x) and Morose(x) -> Resinlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Cesar is not separative. Cesar is trancelike. Merl is separative. Merl is nutbrown. Merl is worldwide. Merl is rhomboid. Moya is javanese. Moya is worldwide. Maisey is not trancelike. Maisey is worldwide. Maisey is rhomboid. Maisey is horned. If Cesar is separative then Cesar is worldwide. Big, nutbrown people are separative. If someone is rhomboid then they are worldwide. If Maisey is not horned and Maisey is not separative then Maisey is trancelike. If Cesar is worldwide then Cesar is horned. Red, horned people are not trancelike. All separative people are rhomboid. If someone is trancelike then they are rhomboid. Moya is not separative.", "logic": "\nnot Separative(cesar)\nTrancelike(cesar)\nSeparative(merl)\nNutbrown(merl)\nWorldwide(merl)\nRhomboid(merl)\nJavanese(moya)\nWorldwide(moya)\nnot Trancelike(maisey)\nWorldwide(maisey)\nRhomboid(maisey)\nHorned(maisey)\nSeparative(cesar) -> Worldwide(cesar)\nforall x (Javanese(x) and Nutbrown(x) -> Separative(x))\nforall x (Rhomboid(x) -> Worldwide(x))\nnot Horned(maisey) and not Separative(maisey) -> Trancelike(maisey)\nWorldwide(cesar) -> Horned(cesar)\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) and Horned(x) -> not Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Separative(x) -> Rhomboid(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Rhomboid(x))\n\nnot Separative(moya)\n\nforall x (Javanese(x) and Nutbrown(x) -> Separative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Waite is not petalled. Waite is more. Fina is petalled. Fina is trifoliate. Fina is unshaved. Fina is regulative. Nydia is corpulent. Nydia is unshaved. Mason is not more. Mason is unshaved. Mason is regulative. Mason is gratuitous. If Waite is petalled then Waite is unshaved. Big, trifoliate people are petalled. If someone is regulative then they are unshaved. If Mason is not gratuitous and Mason is not petalled then Mason is more. If Waite is unshaved then Waite is gratuitous. Red, gratuitous people are not more. All petalled people are regulative. If someone is more then they are regulative. Waite is corpulent.", "logic": "\nnot Petalled(waite)\nMore(waite)\nPetalled(fina)\nTrifoliate(fina)\nUnshaved(fina)\nRegulative(fina)\nCorpulent(nydia)\nUnshaved(nydia)\nnot More(mason)\nUnshaved(mason)\nRegulative(mason)\nGratuitous(mason)\nPetalled(waite) -> Unshaved(waite)\nforall x (Corpulent(x) and Trifoliate(x) -> Petalled(x))\nforall x (Regulative(x) -> Unshaved(x))\nnot Gratuitous(mason) and not Petalled(mason) -> More(mason)\nUnshaved(waite) -> Gratuitous(waite)\nforall x (Trifoliate(x) and Gratuitous(x) -> not More(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (More(x) -> Regulative(x))\n\nCorpulent(waite)\n\nCorpulent(waite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Cathrine is not ambivalent. Cathrine is trussed. Lanita is ambivalent. Lanita is pubertal. Lanita is biological. Lanita is nihilistic. Erny is reddish. Erny is biological. Kristen is not trussed. Kristen is biological. Kristen is nihilistic. Kristen is anosmic. If Cathrine is ambivalent then Cathrine is biological. Big, pubertal people are ambivalent. If someone is nihilistic then they are biological. If Kristen is not anosmic and Kristen is not ambivalent then Kristen is trussed. If Cathrine is biological then Cathrine is anosmic. Red, anosmic people are not trussed. All ambivalent people are nihilistic. If someone is trussed then they are nihilistic. Kristen is not pubertal.", "logic": "\nnot Ambivalent(cathrine)\nTrussed(cathrine)\nAmbivalent(lanita)\nPubertal(lanita)\nBiological(lanita)\nNihilistic(lanita)\nReddish(erny)\nBiological(erny)\nnot Trussed(kristen)\nBiological(kristen)\nNihilistic(kristen)\nAnosmic(kristen)\nAmbivalent(cathrine) -> Biological(cathrine)\nforall x (Reddish(x) and Pubertal(x) -> Ambivalent(x))\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) -> Biological(x))\nnot Anosmic(kristen) and not Ambivalent(kristen) -> Trussed(kristen)\nBiological(cathrine) -> Anosmic(cathrine)\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Anosmic(x) -> not Trussed(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Nihilistic(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Nihilistic(x))\n\nnot Pubertal(kristen)\n\nnot Pubertal(kristen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Tyler is not anaplastic. Tyler is scabrous. Fredric is anaplastic. Fredric is halfway. Fredric is azonal. Fredric is loyal. Derron is benevolent. Derron is azonal. Sharona is not scabrous. Sharona is azonal. Sharona is loyal. Sharona is concurrent. If Tyler is anaplastic then Tyler is azonal. Big, halfway people are anaplastic. If someone is loyal then they are azonal. If Sharona is not concurrent and Sharona is not anaplastic then Sharona is scabrous. If Tyler is azonal then Tyler is concurrent. Red, concurrent people are not scabrous. All anaplastic people are loyal. If someone is scabrous then they are loyal. Fredric is benevolent.", "logic": "\nnot Anaplastic(tyler)\nScabrous(tyler)\nAnaplastic(fredric)\nHalfway(fredric)\nAzonal(fredric)\nLoyal(fredric)\nBenevolent(derron)\nAzonal(derron)\nnot Scabrous(sharona)\nAzonal(sharona)\nLoyal(sharona)\nConcurrent(sharona)\nAnaplastic(tyler) -> Azonal(tyler)\nforall x (Benevolent(x) and Halfway(x) -> Anaplastic(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Azonal(x))\nnot Concurrent(sharona) and not Anaplastic(sharona) -> Scabrous(sharona)\nAzonal(tyler) -> Concurrent(tyler)\nforall x (Halfway(x) and Concurrent(x) -> not Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Anaplastic(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) -> Loyal(x))\n\nBenevolent(fredric)\n\nBenevolent(fredric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Ulla is not dialectal. Ulla is penciled. Grete is dialectal. Grete is jowly. Grete is unenforced. Grete is pious. Phedra is leftish. Phedra is unenforced. Charline is not penciled. Charline is unenforced. Charline is pious. Charline is muslim. If Ulla is dialectal then Ulla is unenforced. Big, jowly people are dialectal. If someone is pious then they are unenforced. If Charline is not muslim and Charline is not dialectal then Charline is penciled. If Ulla is unenforced then Ulla is muslim. Red, muslim people are not penciled. All dialectal people are pious. If someone is penciled then they are pious. Ulla is not jowly.", "logic": "\nnot Dialectal(ulla)\nPenciled(ulla)\nDialectal(grete)\nJowly(grete)\nUnenforced(grete)\nPious(grete)\nLeftish(phedra)\nUnenforced(phedra)\nnot Penciled(charline)\nUnenforced(charline)\nPious(charline)\nMuslim(charline)\nDialectal(ulla) -> Unenforced(ulla)\nforall x (Leftish(x) and Jowly(x) -> Dialectal(x))\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Unenforced(x))\nnot Muslim(charline) and not Dialectal(charline) -> Penciled(charline)\nUnenforced(ulla) -> Muslim(ulla)\nforall x (Jowly(x) and Muslim(x) -> not Penciled(x))\nforall x (Dialectal(x) -> Pious(x))\nforall x (Penciled(x) -> Pious(x))\n\nnot Jowly(ulla)\n\nnot Jowly(ulla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Lisette is not whirring. Lisette is deciduous. Bryn is whirring. Bryn is submissive. Bryn is sunlit. Bryn is polite. Slim is tethered. Slim is sunlit. Engelbert is not deciduous. Engelbert is sunlit. Engelbert is polite. Engelbert is preachy. If Lisette is whirring then Lisette is sunlit. Big, submissive people are whirring. If someone is polite then they are sunlit. If Engelbert is not preachy and Engelbert is not whirring then Engelbert is deciduous. If Lisette is sunlit then Lisette is preachy. Red, preachy people are not deciduous. All whirring people are polite. If someone is deciduous then they are polite. Slim is submissive.", "logic": "\nnot Whirring(lisette)\nDeciduous(lisette)\nWhirring(bryn)\nSubmissive(bryn)\nSunlit(bryn)\nPolite(bryn)\nTethered(slim)\nSunlit(slim)\nnot Deciduous(engelbert)\nSunlit(engelbert)\nPolite(engelbert)\nPreachy(engelbert)\nWhirring(lisette) -> Sunlit(lisette)\nforall x (Tethered(x) and Submissive(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Polite(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nnot Preachy(engelbert) and not Whirring(engelbert) -> Deciduous(engelbert)\nSunlit(lisette) -> Preachy(lisette)\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Preachy(x) -> not Deciduous(x))\nforall x (Whirring(x) -> Polite(x))\nforall x (Deciduous(x) -> Polite(x))\n\nSubmissive(slim)\n\nSubmissive(slim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "The kippie poise the scarlett. The kippie poise the agnesse. The horace tumesce the kippie. The horace is gingery. The horace is cervical. The horace poise the agnesse. The horace untune the kippie. The horace untune the scarlett. The scarlett tumesce the horace. The scarlett untune the horace. The scarlett untune the agnesse. The agnesse tumesce the horace. The agnesse is autogamic. The agnesse is wayfaring. The agnesse untune the kippie. If something untune the scarlett then the scarlett poise the kippie. If something is gingery then it is wayfaring. If something untune the kippie and it is cervical then the kippie is hesitating. If something tumesce the agnesse and it poise the horace then it untune the horace. If something poise the kippie then the kippie is gingery. If the agnesse poise the horace and the horace is gingery then the agnesse is wayfaring. The agnesse untune the kippie.", "logic": "\nPoise(kippie, scarlett)\nPoise(kippie, agnesse)\nTumesce(horace, kippie)\nGingery(horace)\nCervical(horace)\nPoise(horace, agnesse)\nUntune(horace, kippie)\nUntune(horace, scarlett)\nTumesce(scarlett, horace)\nUntune(scarlett, horace)\nUntune(scarlett, agnesse)\nTumesce(agnesse, horace)\nAutogamic(agnesse)\nWayfaring(agnesse)\nUntune(agnesse, kippie)\nforall x (Untune(x, scarlett) -> Poise(scarlett, kippie))\nforall x (Gingery(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Untune(x, kippie) and Cervical(x) -> Hesitating(kippie))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, agnesse) and Poise(x, horace) -> Untune(x, horace))\nforall x (Poise(x, kippie) -> Gingery(kippie))\nPoise(agnesse, horace) and Gingery(horace) -> Wayfaring(agnesse)\n\nUntune(agnesse, kippie)\n\ntherefore Untune(agnesse, kippie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The sella faze the janina. The sella faze the cleland. The lisbeth chevy the sella. The lisbeth is copious. The lisbeth is polluted. The lisbeth faze the cleland. The lisbeth emcee the sella. The lisbeth emcee the janina. The janina chevy the lisbeth. The janina emcee the lisbeth. The janina emcee the cleland. The cleland chevy the lisbeth. The cleland is puerperal. The cleland is probable. The cleland emcee the sella. If something emcee the janina then the janina faze the sella. If something is copious then it is probable. If something emcee the sella and it is polluted then the sella is witty. If something chevy the cleland and it faze the lisbeth then it emcee the lisbeth. If something faze the sella then the sella is copious. If the cleland faze the lisbeth and the lisbeth is copious then the cleland is probable. The cleland does not chase the lisbeth.", "logic": "\nFaze(sella, janina)\nFaze(sella, cleland)\nChevy(lisbeth, sella)\nCopious(lisbeth)\nPolluted(lisbeth)\nFaze(lisbeth, cleland)\nEmcee(lisbeth, sella)\nEmcee(lisbeth, janina)\nChevy(janina, lisbeth)\nEmcee(janina, lisbeth)\nEmcee(janina, cleland)\nChevy(cleland, lisbeth)\nPuerperal(cleland)\nProbable(cleland)\nEmcee(cleland, sella)\nforall x (Emcee(x, janina) -> Faze(janina, sella))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Probable(x))\nforall x (Emcee(x, sella) and Polluted(x) -> Witty(sella))\nforall x (Chevy(x, cleland) and Faze(x, lisbeth) -> Emcee(x, lisbeth))\nforall x (Faze(x, sella) -> Copious(sella))\nFaze(cleland, lisbeth) and Copious(lisbeth) -> Probable(cleland)\n\nnot Chevy(cleland, lisbeth)\n\ntherefore Chevy(cleland, lisbeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The nathanael tonsure the kandace. The nathanael tonsure the rees. The eudora mess the nathanael. The eudora is redolent. The eudora is crinkly. The eudora tonsure the rees. The eudora dislodge the nathanael. The eudora dislodge the kandace. The kandace mess the eudora. The kandace dislodge the eudora. The kandace dislodge the rees. The rees mess the eudora. The rees is overlarge. The rees is parented. The rees dislodge the nathanael. If something dislodge the kandace then the kandace tonsure the nathanael. If something is redolent then it is parented. If something dislodge the nathanael and it is crinkly then the nathanael is norwegian. If something mess the rees and it tonsure the eudora then it dislodge the eudora. If something tonsure the nathanael then the nathanael is redolent. If the rees tonsure the eudora and the eudora is redolent then the rees is parented. The nathanael is norwegian.", "logic": "\nTonsure(nathanael, kandace)\nTonsure(nathanael, rees)\nMess(eudora, nathanael)\nRedolent(eudora)\nCrinkly(eudora)\nTonsure(eudora, rees)\nDislodge(eudora, nathanael)\nDislodge(eudora, kandace)\nMess(kandace, eudora)\nDislodge(kandace, eudora)\nDislodge(kandace, rees)\nMess(rees, eudora)\nOverlarge(rees)\nParented(rees)\nDislodge(rees, nathanael)\nforall x (Dislodge(x, kandace) -> Tonsure(kandace, nathanael))\nforall x (Redolent(x) -> Parented(x))\nforall x (Dislodge(x, nathanael) and Crinkly(x) -> Norwegian(nathanael))\nforall x (Mess(x, rees) and Tonsure(x, eudora) -> Dislodge(x, eudora))\nforall x (Tonsure(x, nathanael) -> Redolent(nathanael))\nTonsure(rees, eudora) and Redolent(eudora) -> Parented(rees)\n\nNorwegian(nathanael)\n\nDislodge(eudora, nathanael) and Crinkly(eudora) and forall x (Dislodge(x, nathanael) and Crinkly(x) -> Norwegian(nathanael)) -> therefore Norwegian(nathanael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The hamish nosedive the tait. The hamish nosedive the callida. The dodie convect the hamish. The dodie is mediaeval. The dodie is volant. The dodie nosedive the callida. The dodie recruit the hamish. The dodie recruit the tait. The tait convect the dodie. The tait recruit the dodie. The tait recruit the callida. The callida convect the dodie. The callida is inutile. The callida is artistic. The callida recruit the hamish. If something recruit the tait then the tait nosedive the hamish. If something is mediaeval then it is artistic. If something recruit the hamish and it is volant then the hamish is mournful. If something convect the callida and it nosedive the dodie then it recruit the dodie. If something nosedive the hamish then the hamish is mediaeval. If the callida nosedive the dodie and the dodie is mediaeval then the callida is artistic. The tait does not need the hamish.", "logic": "\nNosedive(hamish, tait)\nNosedive(hamish, callida)\nConvect(dodie, hamish)\nMediaeval(dodie)\nVolant(dodie)\nNosedive(dodie, callida)\nRecruit(dodie, hamish)\nRecruit(dodie, tait)\nConvect(tait, dodie)\nRecruit(tait, dodie)\nRecruit(tait, callida)\nConvect(callida, dodie)\nInutile(callida)\nArtistic(callida)\nRecruit(callida, hamish)\nforall x (Recruit(x, tait) -> Nosedive(tait, hamish))\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Recruit(x, hamish) and Volant(x) -> Mournful(hamish))\nforall x (Convect(x, callida) and Nosedive(x, dodie) -> Recruit(x, dodie))\nforall x (Nosedive(x, hamish) -> Mediaeval(hamish))\nNosedive(callida, dodie) and Mediaeval(dodie) -> Artistic(callida)\n\nnot Nosedive(tait, hamish)\n\nRecruit(dodie, tait) and forall x (Recruit(x, tait) -> Nosedive(tait, hamish)) -> therefore Nosedive(tait, hamish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The lauree realine the kurt. The lauree realine the garfinkel. The dirk ammonify the lauree. The dirk is vincible. The dirk is patronized. The dirk realine the garfinkel. The dirk betroth the lauree. The dirk betroth the kurt. The kurt ammonify the dirk. The kurt betroth the dirk. The kurt betroth the garfinkel. The garfinkel ammonify the dirk. The garfinkel is extrinsic. The garfinkel is nourishing. The garfinkel betroth the lauree. If something betroth the kurt then the kurt realine the lauree. If something is vincible then it is nourishing. If something betroth the lauree and it is patronized then the lauree is invariable. If something ammonify the garfinkel and it realine the dirk then it betroth the dirk. If something realine the lauree then the lauree is vincible. If the garfinkel realine the dirk and the dirk is vincible then the garfinkel is nourishing. The lauree is vincible.", "logic": "\nRealine(lauree, kurt)\nRealine(lauree, garfinkel)\nAmmonify(dirk, lauree)\nVincible(dirk)\nPatronized(dirk)\nRealine(dirk, garfinkel)\nBetroth(dirk, lauree)\nBetroth(dirk, kurt)\nAmmonify(kurt, dirk)\nBetroth(kurt, dirk)\nBetroth(kurt, garfinkel)\nAmmonify(garfinkel, dirk)\nExtrinsic(garfinkel)\nNourishing(garfinkel)\nBetroth(garfinkel, lauree)\nforall x (Betroth(x, kurt) -> Realine(kurt, lauree))\nforall x (Vincible(x) -> Nourishing(x))\nforall x (Betroth(x, lauree) and Patronized(x) -> Invariable(lauree))\nforall x (Ammonify(x, garfinkel) and Realine(x, dirk) -> Betroth(x, dirk))\nforall x (Realine(x, lauree) -> Vincible(lauree))\nRealine(garfinkel, dirk) and Vincible(dirk) -> Nourishing(garfinkel)\n\nVincible(lauree)\n\nBetroth(dirk, kurt) and forall x (Betroth(x, kurt) -> Realine(kurt, lauree)) -> therefore Realine(kurt, lauree) Realine(kurt, lauree) and forall x (Realine(x, lauree) -> Vincible(lauree)) -> therefore Vincible(lauree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The patricio mongrelize the violet. The patricio mongrelize the nellie. The rudiger phonate the patricio. The rudiger is aweigh. The rudiger is geometric. The rudiger mongrelize the nellie. The rudiger roughhouse the patricio. The rudiger roughhouse the violet. The violet phonate the rudiger. The violet roughhouse the rudiger. The violet roughhouse the nellie. The nellie phonate the rudiger. The nellie is costate. The nellie is unhappy. The nellie roughhouse the patricio. If something roughhouse the violet then the violet mongrelize the patricio. If something is aweigh then it is unhappy. If something roughhouse the patricio and it is geometric then the patricio is lonesome. If something phonate the nellie and it mongrelize the rudiger then it roughhouse the rudiger. If something mongrelize the patricio then the patricio is aweigh. If the nellie mongrelize the rudiger and the rudiger is aweigh then the nellie is unhappy. The patricio is not aweigh.", "logic": "\nMongrelize(patricio, violet)\nMongrelize(patricio, nellie)\nPhonate(rudiger, patricio)\nAweigh(rudiger)\nGeometric(rudiger)\nMongrelize(rudiger, nellie)\nRoughhouse(rudiger, patricio)\nRoughhouse(rudiger, violet)\nPhonate(violet, rudiger)\nRoughhouse(violet, rudiger)\nRoughhouse(violet, nellie)\nPhonate(nellie, rudiger)\nCostate(nellie)\nUnhappy(nellie)\nRoughhouse(nellie, patricio)\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, violet) -> Mongrelize(violet, patricio))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Unhappy(x))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, patricio) and Geometric(x) -> Lonesome(patricio))\nforall x (Phonate(x, nellie) and Mongrelize(x, rudiger) -> Roughhouse(x, rudiger))\nforall x (Mongrelize(x, patricio) -> Aweigh(patricio))\nMongrelize(nellie, rudiger) and Aweigh(rudiger) -> Unhappy(nellie)\n\nnot Aweigh(patricio)\n\nRoughhouse(rudiger, violet) and forall x (Roughhouse(x, violet) -> Mongrelize(violet, patricio)) -> therefore Mongrelize(violet, patricio) Mongrelize(violet, patricio) and forall x (Mongrelize(x, patricio) -> Aweigh(patricio)) -> therefore Aweigh(patricio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The brita grimace the viola. The brita grimace the mallissa. The damara outlast the brita. The damara is lurid. The damara is facetious. The damara grimace the mallissa. The damara violate the brita. The damara violate the viola. The viola outlast the damara. The viola violate the damara. The viola violate the mallissa. The mallissa outlast the damara. The mallissa is brindled. The mallissa is staring. The mallissa violate the brita. If something violate the viola then the viola grimace the brita. If something is lurid then it is staring. If something violate the brita and it is facetious then the brita is friendless. If something outlast the mallissa and it grimace the damara then it violate the damara. If something grimace the brita then the brita is lurid. If the mallissa grimace the damara and the damara is lurid then the mallissa is staring. The brita is staring.", "logic": "\nGrimace(brita, viola)\nGrimace(brita, mallissa)\nOutlast(damara, brita)\nLurid(damara)\nFacetious(damara)\nGrimace(damara, mallissa)\nViolate(damara, brita)\nViolate(damara, viola)\nOutlast(viola, damara)\nViolate(viola, damara)\nViolate(viola, mallissa)\nOutlast(mallissa, damara)\nBrindled(mallissa)\nStaring(mallissa)\nViolate(mallissa, brita)\nforall x (Violate(x, viola) -> Grimace(viola, brita))\nforall x (Lurid(x) -> Staring(x))\nforall x (Violate(x, brita) and Facetious(x) -> Friendless(brita))\nforall x (Outlast(x, mallissa) and Grimace(x, damara) -> Violate(x, damara))\nforall x (Grimace(x, brita) -> Lurid(brita))\nGrimace(mallissa, damara) and Lurid(damara) -> Staring(mallissa)\n\nStaring(brita)\n\nViolate(damara, viola) and forall x (Violate(x, viola) -> Grimace(viola, brita)) -> therefore Grimace(viola, brita) Grimace(viola, brita) and forall x (Grimace(x, brita) -> Lurid(brita)) -> therefore Lurid(brita) Lurid(brita) and forall x (Lurid(x) -> Staring(x)) -> therefore Staring(brita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The issy cure the fifi. The issy cure the cecilia. The brent hymn the issy. The brent is choragic. The brent is delimited. The brent cure the cecilia. The brent reave the issy. The brent reave the fifi. The fifi hymn the brent. The fifi reave the brent. The fifi reave the cecilia. The cecilia hymn the brent. The cecilia is congruent. The cecilia is gratuitous. The cecilia reave the issy. If something reave the fifi then the fifi cure the issy. If something is choragic then it is gratuitous. If something reave the issy and it is delimited then the issy is overproud. If something hymn the cecilia and it cure the brent then it reave the brent. If something cure the issy then the issy is choragic. If the cecilia cure the brent and the brent is choragic then the cecilia is gratuitous. The issy is not gratuitous.", "logic": "\nCure(issy, fifi)\nCure(issy, cecilia)\nHymn(brent, issy)\nChoragic(brent)\nDelimited(brent)\nCure(brent, cecilia)\nReave(brent, issy)\nReave(brent, fifi)\nHymn(fifi, brent)\nReave(fifi, brent)\nReave(fifi, cecilia)\nHymn(cecilia, brent)\nCongruent(cecilia)\nGratuitous(cecilia)\nReave(cecilia, issy)\nforall x (Reave(x, fifi) -> Cure(fifi, issy))\nforall x (Choragic(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\nforall x (Reave(x, issy) and Delimited(x) -> Overproud(issy))\nforall x (Hymn(x, cecilia) and Cure(x, brent) -> Reave(x, brent))\nforall x (Cure(x, issy) -> Choragic(issy))\nCure(cecilia, brent) and Choragic(brent) -> Gratuitous(cecilia)\n\nnot Gratuitous(issy)\n\nReave(brent, fifi) and forall x (Reave(x, fifi) -> Cure(fifi, issy)) -> therefore Cure(fifi, issy) Cure(fifi, issy) and forall x (Cure(x, issy) -> Choragic(issy)) -> therefore Choragic(issy) Choragic(issy) and forall x (Choragic(x) -> Gratuitous(x)) -> therefore Gratuitous(issy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The marcio resist the lorraine. The marcio resist the nonah. The rozanna agenize the marcio. The rozanna is blithe. The rozanna is renal. The rozanna resist the nonah. The rozanna foal the marcio. The rozanna foal the lorraine. The lorraine agenize the rozanna. The lorraine foal the rozanna. The lorraine foal the nonah. The nonah agenize the rozanna. The nonah is discrete. The nonah is polish. The nonah foal the marcio. If something foal the lorraine then the lorraine resist the marcio. If something is blithe then it is polish. If something foal the marcio and it is renal then the marcio is unmarried. If something agenize the nonah and it resist the rozanna then it foal the rozanna. If something resist the marcio then the marcio is blithe. If the nonah resist the rozanna and the rozanna is blithe then the nonah is polish. The lorraine is not polish.", "logic": "\nResist(marcio, lorraine)\nResist(marcio, nonah)\nAgenize(rozanna, marcio)\nBlithe(rozanna)\nRenal(rozanna)\nResist(rozanna, nonah)\nFoal(rozanna, marcio)\nFoal(rozanna, lorraine)\nAgenize(lorraine, rozanna)\nFoal(lorraine, rozanna)\nFoal(lorraine, nonah)\nAgenize(nonah, rozanna)\nDiscrete(nonah)\nPolish(nonah)\nFoal(nonah, marcio)\nforall x (Foal(x, lorraine) -> Resist(lorraine, marcio))\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Foal(x, marcio) and Renal(x) -> Unmarried(marcio))\nforall x (Agenize(x, nonah) and Resist(x, rozanna) -> Foal(x, rozanna))\nforall x (Resist(x, marcio) -> Blithe(marcio))\nResist(nonah, rozanna) and Blithe(rozanna) -> Polish(nonah)\n\nnot Polish(lorraine)\n\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Polish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The mable bypass the torre. The mable bypass the lurlene. The tan excel the mable. The tan is unwitting. The tan is difficult. The tan bypass the lurlene. The tan figure the mable. The tan figure the torre. The torre excel the tan. The torre figure the tan. The torre figure the lurlene. The lurlene excel the tan. The lurlene is tearing. The lurlene is disjunct. The lurlene figure the mable. If something figure the torre then the torre bypass the mable. If something is unwitting then it is disjunct. If something figure the mable and it is difficult then the mable is bastioned. If something excel the lurlene and it bypass the tan then it figure the tan. If something bypass the mable then the mable is unwitting. If the lurlene bypass the tan and the tan is unwitting then the lurlene is disjunct. The lurlene figure the tan.", "logic": "\nBypass(mable, torre)\nBypass(mable, lurlene)\nExcel(tan, mable)\nUnwitting(tan)\nDifficult(tan)\nBypass(tan, lurlene)\nFigure(tan, mable)\nFigure(tan, torre)\nExcel(torre, tan)\nFigure(torre, tan)\nFigure(torre, lurlene)\nExcel(lurlene, tan)\nTearing(lurlene)\nDisjunct(lurlene)\nFigure(lurlene, mable)\nforall x (Figure(x, torre) -> Bypass(torre, mable))\nforall x (Unwitting(x) -> Disjunct(x))\nforall x (Figure(x, mable) and Difficult(x) -> Bastioned(mable))\nforall x (Excel(x, lurlene) and Bypass(x, tan) -> Figure(x, tan))\nforall x (Bypass(x, mable) -> Unwitting(mable))\nBypass(lurlene, tan) and Unwitting(tan) -> Disjunct(lurlene)\n\nFigure(lurlene, tan)\n\nforall x (Excel(x, lurlene) and Bypass(x, tan) -> Figure(x, tan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The marcy discover the federica. The marcy discover the damita. The reggie elapse the marcy. The reggie is syllabic. The reggie is half. The reggie discover the damita. The reggie bullyrag the marcy. The reggie bullyrag the federica. The federica elapse the reggie. The federica bullyrag the reggie. The federica bullyrag the damita. The damita elapse the reggie. The damita is hoydenish. The damita is satyric. The damita bullyrag the marcy. If something bullyrag the federica then the federica discover the marcy. If something is syllabic then it is satyric. If something bullyrag the marcy and it is half then the marcy is lxxiii. If something elapse the damita and it discover the reggie then it bullyrag the reggie. If something discover the marcy then the marcy is syllabic. If the damita discover the reggie and the reggie is syllabic then the damita is satyric. The marcy does not visit the reggie.", "logic": "\nDiscover(marcy, federica)\nDiscover(marcy, damita)\nElapse(reggie, marcy)\nSyllabic(reggie)\nHalf(reggie)\nDiscover(reggie, damita)\nBullyrag(reggie, marcy)\nBullyrag(reggie, federica)\nElapse(federica, reggie)\nBullyrag(federica, reggie)\nBullyrag(federica, damita)\nElapse(damita, reggie)\nHoydenish(damita)\nSatyric(damita)\nBullyrag(damita, marcy)\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, federica) -> Discover(federica, marcy))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> Satyric(x))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, marcy) and Half(x) -> Lxxiii(marcy))\nforall x (Elapse(x, damita) and Discover(x, reggie) -> Bullyrag(x, reggie))\nforall x (Discover(x, marcy) -> Syllabic(marcy))\nDiscover(damita, reggie) and Syllabic(reggie) -> Satyric(damita)\n\nnot Bullyrag(marcy, reggie)\n\nforall x (Elapse(x, damita) and Discover(x, reggie) -> Bullyrag(x, reggie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The marion etherise the edmond. The marion etherise the ariana. The venus progress the marion. The venus is seamanly. The venus is luminous. The venus etherise the ariana. The venus overspend the marion. The venus overspend the edmond. The edmond progress the venus. The edmond overspend the venus. The edmond overspend the ariana. The ariana progress the venus. The ariana is unheralded. The ariana is cleanable. The ariana overspend the marion. If something overspend the edmond then the edmond etherise the marion. If something is seamanly then it is cleanable. If something overspend the marion and it is luminous then the marion is limber. If something progress the ariana and it etherise the venus then it overspend the venus. If something etherise the marion then the marion is seamanly. If the ariana etherise the venus and the venus is seamanly then the ariana is cleanable. The venus overspend the venus.", "logic": "\nEtherise(marion, edmond)\nEtherise(marion, ariana)\nProgress(venus, marion)\nSeamanly(venus)\nLuminous(venus)\nEtherise(venus, ariana)\nOverspend(venus, marion)\nOverspend(venus, edmond)\nProgress(edmond, venus)\nOverspend(edmond, venus)\nOverspend(edmond, ariana)\nProgress(ariana, venus)\nUnheralded(ariana)\nCleanable(ariana)\nOverspend(ariana, marion)\nforall x (Overspend(x, edmond) -> Etherise(edmond, marion))\nforall x (Seamanly(x) -> Cleanable(x))\nforall x (Overspend(x, marion) and Luminous(x) -> Limber(marion))\nforall x (Progress(x, ariana) and Etherise(x, venus) -> Overspend(x, venus))\nforall x (Etherise(x, marion) -> Seamanly(marion))\nEtherise(ariana, venus) and Seamanly(venus) -> Cleanable(ariana)\n\nOverspend(venus, venus)\n\nforall x (Progress(x, ariana) and Etherise(x, venus) -> Overspend(x, venus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The kirsti explode the marlena. The kirsti explode the luther. The emmanuel crowd the kirsti. The emmanuel is electric. The emmanuel is geothermic. The emmanuel explode the luther. The emmanuel liberalize the kirsti. The emmanuel liberalize the marlena. The marlena crowd the emmanuel. The marlena liberalize the emmanuel. The marlena liberalize the luther. The luther crowd the emmanuel. The luther is cedarn. The luther is analgetic. The luther liberalize the kirsti. If something liberalize the marlena then the marlena explode the kirsti. If something is electric then it is analgetic. If something liberalize the kirsti and it is geothermic then the kirsti is upwind. If something crowd the luther and it explode the emmanuel then it liberalize the emmanuel. If something explode the kirsti then the kirsti is electric. If the luther explode the emmanuel and the emmanuel is electric then the luther is analgetic. The kirsti is not cedarn.", "logic": "\nExplode(kirsti, marlena)\nExplode(kirsti, luther)\nCrowd(emmanuel, kirsti)\nElectric(emmanuel)\nGeothermic(emmanuel)\nExplode(emmanuel, luther)\nLiberalize(emmanuel, kirsti)\nLiberalize(emmanuel, marlena)\nCrowd(marlena, emmanuel)\nLiberalize(marlena, emmanuel)\nLiberalize(marlena, luther)\nCrowd(luther, emmanuel)\nCedarn(luther)\nAnalgetic(luther)\nLiberalize(luther, kirsti)\nforall x (Liberalize(x, marlena) -> Explode(marlena, kirsti))\nforall x (Electric(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Liberalize(x, kirsti) and Geothermic(x) -> Upwind(kirsti))\nforall x (Crowd(x, luther) and Explode(x, emmanuel) -> Liberalize(x, emmanuel))\nforall x (Explode(x, kirsti) -> Electric(kirsti))\nExplode(luther, emmanuel) and Electric(emmanuel) -> Analgetic(luther)\n\nnot Cedarn(kirsti)\n\nnot Cedarn(kirsti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The gwenora glut the fabio. The gwenora glut the grier. The benedikta complement the gwenora. The benedikta is binucleate. The benedikta is anatomic. The benedikta glut the grier. The benedikta eternize the gwenora. The benedikta eternize the fabio. The fabio complement the benedikta. The fabio eternize the benedikta. The fabio eternize the grier. The grier complement the benedikta. The grier is cannibalic. The grier is moribund. The grier eternize the gwenora. If something eternize the fabio then the fabio glut the gwenora. If something is binucleate then it is moribund. If something eternize the gwenora and it is anatomic then the gwenora is cordless. If something complement the grier and it glut the benedikta then it eternize the benedikta. If something glut the gwenora then the gwenora is binucleate. If the grier glut the benedikta and the benedikta is binucleate then the grier is moribund. The benedikta glut the fabio.", "logic": "\nGlut(gwenora, fabio)\nGlut(gwenora, grier)\nComplement(benedikta, gwenora)\nBinucleate(benedikta)\nAnatomic(benedikta)\nGlut(benedikta, grier)\nEternize(benedikta, gwenora)\nEternize(benedikta, fabio)\nComplement(fabio, benedikta)\nEternize(fabio, benedikta)\nEternize(fabio, grier)\nComplement(grier, benedikta)\nCannibalic(grier)\nMoribund(grier)\nEternize(grier, gwenora)\nforall x (Eternize(x, fabio) -> Glut(fabio, gwenora))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) -> Moribund(x))\nforall x (Eternize(x, gwenora) and Anatomic(x) -> Cordless(gwenora))\nforall x (Complement(x, grier) and Glut(x, benedikta) -> Eternize(x, benedikta))\nforall x (Glut(x, gwenora) -> Binucleate(gwenora))\nGlut(grier, benedikta) and Binucleate(benedikta) -> Moribund(grier)\n\nGlut(benedikta, fabio)\n\nGlut(benedikta, fabio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The birgitta undercoat the joyann. The birgitta undercoat the tanney. The kimberlee bask the birgitta. The kimberlee is cumbrous. The kimberlee is patent. The kimberlee undercoat the tanney. The kimberlee magnetise the birgitta. The kimberlee magnetise the joyann. The joyann bask the kimberlee. The joyann magnetise the kimberlee. The joyann magnetise the tanney. The tanney bask the kimberlee. The tanney is turgid. The tanney is allocable. The tanney magnetise the birgitta. If something magnetise the joyann then the joyann undercoat the birgitta. If something is cumbrous then it is allocable. If something magnetise the birgitta and it is patent then the birgitta is feculent. If something bask the tanney and it undercoat the kimberlee then it magnetise the kimberlee. If something undercoat the birgitta then the birgitta is cumbrous. If the tanney undercoat the kimberlee and the kimberlee is cumbrous then the tanney is allocable. The tanney does not visit the tanney.", "logic": "\nUndercoat(birgitta, joyann)\nUndercoat(birgitta, tanney)\nBask(kimberlee, birgitta)\nCumbrous(kimberlee)\nPatent(kimberlee)\nUndercoat(kimberlee, tanney)\nMagnetise(kimberlee, birgitta)\nMagnetise(kimberlee, joyann)\nBask(joyann, kimberlee)\nMagnetise(joyann, kimberlee)\nMagnetise(joyann, tanney)\nBask(tanney, kimberlee)\nTurgid(tanney)\nAllocable(tanney)\nMagnetise(tanney, birgitta)\nforall x (Magnetise(x, joyann) -> Undercoat(joyann, birgitta))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Allocable(x))\nforall x (Magnetise(x, birgitta) and Patent(x) -> Feculent(birgitta))\nforall x (Bask(x, tanney) and Undercoat(x, kimberlee) -> Magnetise(x, kimberlee))\nforall x (Undercoat(x, birgitta) -> Cumbrous(birgitta))\nUndercoat(tanney, kimberlee) and Cumbrous(kimberlee) -> Allocable(tanney)\n\nnot Magnetise(tanney, tanney)\n\nnot Magnetise(tanney, tanney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The gabrielle toll the kass. The gabrielle toll the ardenia. The harley gown the gabrielle. The harley is lento. The harley is smiling. The harley toll the ardenia. The harley engraft the gabrielle. The harley engraft the kass. The kass gown the harley. The kass engraft the harley. The kass engraft the ardenia. The ardenia gown the harley. The ardenia is exocrine. The ardenia is stereo. The ardenia engraft the gabrielle. If something engraft the kass then the kass toll the gabrielle. If something is lento then it is stereo. If something engraft the gabrielle and it is smiling then the gabrielle is veterinary. If something gown the ardenia and it toll the harley then it engraft the harley. If something toll the gabrielle then the gabrielle is lento. If the ardenia toll the harley and the harley is lento then the ardenia is stereo. The gabrielle gown the ardenia.", "logic": "\nToll(gabrielle, kass)\nToll(gabrielle, ardenia)\nGown(harley, gabrielle)\nLento(harley)\nSmiling(harley)\nToll(harley, ardenia)\nEngraft(harley, gabrielle)\nEngraft(harley, kass)\nGown(kass, harley)\nEngraft(kass, harley)\nEngraft(kass, ardenia)\nGown(ardenia, harley)\nExocrine(ardenia)\nStereo(ardenia)\nEngraft(ardenia, gabrielle)\nforall x (Engraft(x, kass) -> Toll(kass, gabrielle))\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Stereo(x))\nforall x (Engraft(x, gabrielle) and Smiling(x) -> Veterinary(gabrielle))\nforall x (Gown(x, ardenia) and Toll(x, harley) -> Engraft(x, harley))\nforall x (Toll(x, gabrielle) -> Lento(gabrielle))\nToll(ardenia, harley) and Lento(harley) -> Stereo(ardenia)\n\nGown(gabrielle, ardenia)\n\nGown(gabrielle, ardenia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Malkah is factitious. Malkah is clear. Hazel is factitious. Hazel is blasting. Hazel is lymphatic. Hazel is clear. Hersch is blasting. Hersch is roily. Hersch is clear. Jeri is clear. If Malkah is factitious then Malkah is blasting. If something is factitious and clear then it is lymphatic. Kind things are lymphatic. If Hersch is clear and Hersch is roily then Hersch is blasting. If something is roily then it is factitious. Red things are blasting. If something is factitious then it is clear. Cold, clear things are roily. Jeri is clear.", "logic": "\nFactitious(malkah)\nClear(malkah)\nFactitious(hazel)\nBlasting(hazel)\nLymphatic(hazel)\nClear(hazel)\nBlasting(hersch)\nRoily(hersch)\nClear(hersch)\nClear(jeri)\nFactitious(malkah) -> Blasting(malkah)\nforall x (Factitious(x) and Clear(x) -> Lymphatic(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Lymphatic(x))\nClear(hersch) and Roily(hersch) -> Blasting(hersch)\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Factitious(x))\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Blasting(x))\nforall x (Factitious(x) -> Clear(x))\nforall x (Blasting(x) and Clear(x) -> Roily(x))\n\nClear(jeri)\n\ntherefore Clear(jeri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Inessa is satyrical. Inessa is parturient. Parry is satyrical. Parry is bookish. Parry is prefab. Parry is parturient. Hayley is bookish. Hayley is crowning. Hayley is parturient. Carolina is parturient. If Inessa is satyrical then Inessa is bookish. If something is satyrical and parturient then it is prefab. Kind things are prefab. If Hayley is parturient and Hayley is crowning then Hayley is bookish. If something is crowning then it is satyrical. Red things are bookish. If something is satyrical then it is parturient. Cold, parturient things are crowning. Parry is not parturient.", "logic": "\nSatyrical(inessa)\nParturient(inessa)\nSatyrical(parry)\nBookish(parry)\nPrefab(parry)\nParturient(parry)\nBookish(hayley)\nCrowning(hayley)\nParturient(hayley)\nParturient(carolina)\nSatyrical(inessa) -> Bookish(inessa)\nforall x (Satyrical(x) and Parturient(x) -> Prefab(x))\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Prefab(x))\nParturient(hayley) and Crowning(hayley) -> Bookish(hayley)\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Satyrical(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Bookish(x))\nforall x (Satyrical(x) -> Parturient(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) and Parturient(x) -> Crowning(x))\n\nnot Parturient(parry)\n\ntherefore Parturient(parry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Kenny is narcotic. Kenny is dubious. Abbey is narcotic. Abbey is saving. Abbey is raring. Abbey is dubious. Anselm is saving. Anselm is rhizoidal. Anselm is dubious. Mellie is dubious. If Kenny is narcotic then Kenny is saving. If something is narcotic and dubious then it is raring. Kind things are raring. If Anselm is dubious and Anselm is rhizoidal then Anselm is saving. If something is rhizoidal then it is narcotic. Red things are saving. If something is narcotic then it is dubious. Cold, dubious things are rhizoidal. Abbey is rhizoidal.", "logic": "\nNarcotic(kenny)\nDubious(kenny)\nNarcotic(abbey)\nSaving(abbey)\nRaring(abbey)\nDubious(abbey)\nSaving(anselm)\nRhizoidal(anselm)\nDubious(anselm)\nDubious(mellie)\nNarcotic(kenny) -> Saving(kenny)\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Dubious(x) -> Raring(x))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Raring(x))\nDubious(anselm) and Rhizoidal(anselm) -> Saving(anselm)\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Dubious(x) -> Saving(x))\nforall x (Narcotic(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Saving(x) and Dubious(x) -> Rhizoidal(x))\n\nRhizoidal(abbey)\n\nSaving(abbey) and Dubious(abbey) and forall x (Saving(x) and Dubious(x) -> Rhizoidal(x)) -> therefore Rhizoidal(abbey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Burke is paniculate. Burke is barbadian. Hillary is paniculate. Hillary is honourable. Hillary is assigned. Hillary is barbadian. Kit is honourable. Kit is mutant. Kit is barbadian. Wakefield is barbadian. If Burke is paniculate then Burke is honourable. If something is paniculate and barbadian then it is assigned. Kind things are assigned. If Kit is barbadian and Kit is mutant then Kit is honourable. If something is mutant then it is paniculate. Red things are honourable. If something is paniculate then it is barbadian. Cold, barbadian things are mutant. Kit is not paniculate.", "logic": "\nPaniculate(burke)\nBarbadian(burke)\nPaniculate(hillary)\nHonourable(hillary)\nAssigned(hillary)\nBarbadian(hillary)\nHonourable(kit)\nMutant(kit)\nBarbadian(kit)\nBarbadian(wakefield)\nPaniculate(burke) -> Honourable(burke)\nforall x (Paniculate(x) and Barbadian(x) -> Assigned(x))\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> Assigned(x))\nBarbadian(kit) and Mutant(kit) -> Honourable(kit)\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> Paniculate(x))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) -> Honourable(x))\nforall x (Paniculate(x) -> Barbadian(x))\nforall x (Honourable(x) and Barbadian(x) -> Mutant(x))\n\nnot Paniculate(kit)\n\nMutant(kit) and forall x (Mutant(x) -> Paniculate(x)) -> therefore Paniculate(kit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Sula is tallish. Sula is sassy. Katuscha is tallish. Katuscha is floating. Katuscha is raddled. Katuscha is sassy. Ingeberg is floating. Ingeberg is urgent. Ingeberg is sassy. Allyn is sassy. If Sula is tallish then Sula is floating. If something is tallish and sassy then it is raddled. Kind things are raddled. If Ingeberg is sassy and Ingeberg is urgent then Ingeberg is floating. If something is urgent then it is tallish. Red things are floating. If something is tallish then it is sassy. Cold, sassy things are urgent. Sula is urgent.", "logic": "\nTallish(sula)\nSassy(sula)\nTallish(katuscha)\nFloating(katuscha)\nRaddled(katuscha)\nSassy(katuscha)\nFloating(ingeberg)\nUrgent(ingeberg)\nSassy(ingeberg)\nSassy(allyn)\nTallish(sula) -> Floating(sula)\nforall x (Tallish(x) and Sassy(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Raddled(x))\nSassy(ingeberg) and Urgent(ingeberg) -> Floating(ingeberg)\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Tallish(x))\nforall x (Sassy(x) -> Floating(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Sassy(x))\nforall x (Floating(x) and Sassy(x) -> Urgent(x))\n\nUrgent(sula)\n\nTallish(sula) and Tallish(sula) -> Floating(sula) -> therefore Floating(sula) Floating(sula) and Sassy(sula) and forall x (Floating(x) and Sassy(x) -> Urgent(x)) -> therefore Urgent(sula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Laureen is pandemic. Laureen is glassed. Ree is pandemic. Ree is adjustable. Ree is scented. Ree is glassed. Ace is adjustable. Ace is mechanical. Ace is glassed. Fawna is glassed. If Laureen is pandemic then Laureen is adjustable. If something is pandemic and glassed then it is scented. Kind things are scented. If Ace is glassed and Ace is mechanical then Ace is adjustable. If something is mechanical then it is pandemic. Red things are adjustable. If something is pandemic then it is glassed. Cold, glassed things are mechanical. Laureen is not mechanical.", "logic": "\nPandemic(laureen)\nGlassed(laureen)\nPandemic(ree)\nAdjustable(ree)\nScented(ree)\nGlassed(ree)\nAdjustable(ace)\nMechanical(ace)\nGlassed(ace)\nGlassed(fawna)\nPandemic(laureen) -> Adjustable(laureen)\nforall x (Pandemic(x) and Glassed(x) -> Scented(x))\nforall x (Mechanical(x) -> Scented(x))\nGlassed(ace) and Mechanical(ace) -> Adjustable(ace)\nforall x (Mechanical(x) -> Pandemic(x))\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) -> Glassed(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) and Glassed(x) -> Mechanical(x))\n\nnot Mechanical(laureen)\n\nPandemic(laureen) and Pandemic(laureen) -> Adjustable(laureen) -> therefore Adjustable(laureen) Adjustable(laureen) and Glassed(laureen) and forall x (Adjustable(x) and Glassed(x) -> Mechanical(x)) -> therefore Mechanical(laureen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Cathrine is thrilling. Cathrine is prototypic. Roseline is thrilling. Roseline is tawdry. Roseline is unnerved. Roseline is prototypic. Wandie is tawdry. Wandie is osseous. Wandie is prototypic. Elfrieda is prototypic. If Cathrine is thrilling then Cathrine is tawdry. If something is thrilling and prototypic then it is unnerved. Kind things are unnerved. If Wandie is prototypic and Wandie is osseous then Wandie is tawdry. If something is osseous then it is thrilling. Red things are tawdry. If something is thrilling then it is prototypic. Cold, prototypic things are osseous. Elfrieda is thrilling.", "logic": "\nThrilling(cathrine)\nPrototypic(cathrine)\nThrilling(roseline)\nTawdry(roseline)\nUnnerved(roseline)\nPrototypic(roseline)\nTawdry(wandie)\nOsseous(wandie)\nPrototypic(wandie)\nPrototypic(elfrieda)\nThrilling(cathrine) -> Tawdry(cathrine)\nforall x (Thrilling(x) and Prototypic(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Osseous(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nPrototypic(wandie) and Osseous(wandie) -> Tawdry(wandie)\nforall x (Osseous(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Prototypic(x) -> Tawdry(x))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Prototypic(x))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) and Prototypic(x) -> Osseous(x))\n\nThrilling(elfrieda)\n\nPrototypic(elfrieda) and forall x (Prototypic(x) -> Tawdry(x)) -> therefore Tawdry(elfrieda) Tawdry(elfrieda) and Prototypic(elfrieda) and forall x (Tawdry(x) and Prototypic(x) -> Osseous(x)) -> therefore Osseous(elfrieda) Osseous(elfrieda) and forall x (Osseous(x) -> Thrilling(x)) -> therefore Thrilling(elfrieda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Nero is towering. Nero is middling. Latrena is towering. Latrena is flawed. Latrena is bobtailed. Latrena is middling. Randal is flawed. Randal is interbred. Randal is middling. Susanna is middling. If Nero is towering then Nero is flawed. If something is towering and middling then it is bobtailed. Kind things are bobtailed. If Randal is middling and Randal is interbred then Randal is flawed. If something is interbred then it is towering. Red things are flawed. If something is towering then it is middling. Cold, middling things are interbred. Susanna is not bobtailed.", "logic": "\nTowering(nero)\nMiddling(nero)\nTowering(latrena)\nFlawed(latrena)\nBobtailed(latrena)\nMiddling(latrena)\nFlawed(randal)\nInterbred(randal)\nMiddling(randal)\nMiddling(susanna)\nTowering(nero) -> Flawed(nero)\nforall x (Towering(x) and Middling(x) -> Bobtailed(x))\nforall x (Interbred(x) -> Bobtailed(x))\nMiddling(randal) and Interbred(randal) -> Flawed(randal)\nforall x (Interbred(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Flawed(x))\nforall x (Towering(x) -> Middling(x))\nforall x (Flawed(x) and Middling(x) -> Interbred(x))\n\nnot Bobtailed(susanna)\n\nMiddling(susanna) and forall x (Middling(x) -> Flawed(x)) -> therefore Flawed(susanna) Flawed(susanna) and Middling(susanna) and forall x (Flawed(x) and Middling(x) -> Interbred(x)) -> therefore Interbred(susanna) Interbred(susanna) and forall x (Interbred(x) -> Bobtailed(x)) -> therefore Bobtailed(susanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Calli is industrial. Calli is hmong. Loree is industrial. Loree is latin. Loree is anorectal. Loree is hmong. Arlen is latin. Arlen is chemical. Arlen is hmong. Gredel is hmong. If Calli is industrial then Calli is latin. If something is industrial and hmong then it is anorectal. Kind things are anorectal. If Arlen is hmong and Arlen is chemical then Arlen is latin. If something is chemical then it is industrial. Red things are latin. If something is industrial then it is hmong. Cold, hmong things are chemical. Calli is not nice.", "logic": "\nIndustrial(calli)\nHmong(calli)\nIndustrial(loree)\nLatin(loree)\nAnorectal(loree)\nHmong(loree)\nLatin(arlen)\nChemical(arlen)\nHmong(arlen)\nHmong(gredel)\nIndustrial(calli) -> Latin(calli)\nforall x (Industrial(x) and Hmong(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nHmong(arlen) and Chemical(arlen) -> Latin(arlen)\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Industrial(x))\nforall x (Hmong(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Industrial(x) -> Hmong(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) and Hmong(x) -> Chemical(x))\n\nnot Nice(calli)\n\nnot Nice(calli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Leisha is fanciful. Leisha is divided. Maisie is fanciful. Maisie is bungling. Maisie is errhine. Maisie is divided. Gearard is bungling. Gearard is apocryphal. Gearard is divided. Allina is divided. If Leisha is fanciful then Leisha is bungling. If something is fanciful and divided then it is errhine. Kind things are errhine. If Gearard is divided and Gearard is apocryphal then Gearard is bungling. If something is apocryphal then it is fanciful. Red things are bungling. If something is fanciful then it is divided. Cold, divided things are apocryphal. Gearard is nice.", "logic": "\nFanciful(leisha)\nDivided(leisha)\nFanciful(maisie)\nBungling(maisie)\nErrhine(maisie)\nDivided(maisie)\nBungling(gearard)\nApocryphal(gearard)\nDivided(gearard)\nDivided(allina)\nFanciful(leisha) -> Bungling(leisha)\nforall x (Fanciful(x) and Divided(x) -> Errhine(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Errhine(x))\nDivided(gearard) and Apocryphal(gearard) -> Bungling(gearard)\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Fanciful(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Bungling(x))\nforall x (Fanciful(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Bungling(x) and Divided(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\n\nNice(gearard)\n\nNice(gearard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Issi is goosy. Issi is unbounded. Adrien is goosy. Adrien is diffused. Adrien is unsweet. Adrien is unbounded. Wendie is diffused. Wendie is silverish. Wendie is unbounded. Joab is unbounded. If Issi is goosy then Issi is diffused. If something is goosy and unbounded then it is unsweet. Kind things are unsweet. If Wendie is unbounded and Wendie is silverish then Wendie is diffused. If something is silverish then it is goosy. Red things are diffused. If something is goosy then it is unbounded. Cold, unbounded things are silverish. Wendie is not round.", "logic": "\nGoosy(issi)\nUnbounded(issi)\nGoosy(adrien)\nDiffused(adrien)\nUnsweet(adrien)\nUnbounded(adrien)\nDiffused(wendie)\nSilverish(wendie)\nUnbounded(wendie)\nUnbounded(joab)\nGoosy(issi) -> Diffused(issi)\nforall x (Goosy(x) and Unbounded(x) -> Unsweet(x))\nforall x (Silverish(x) -> Unsweet(x))\nUnbounded(wendie) and Silverish(wendie) -> Diffused(wendie)\nforall x (Silverish(x) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Unbounded(x) -> Diffused(x))\nforall x (Goosy(x) -> Unbounded(x))\nforall x (Diffused(x) and Unbounded(x) -> Silverish(x))\n\nnot Round(wendie)\n\nnot Round(wendie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Bay is downtown. Bay is breathless. Roddy is downtown. Roddy is clausal. Roddy is maimed. Roddy is breathless. Adela is clausal. Adela is radial. Adela is breathless. Gwen is breathless. If Bay is downtown then Bay is clausal. If something is downtown and breathless then it is maimed. Kind things are maimed. If Adela is breathless and Adela is radial then Adela is clausal. If something is radial then it is downtown. Red things are clausal. If something is downtown then it is breathless. Cold, breathless things are radial. Gwen is nice.", "logic": "\nDowntown(bay)\nBreathless(bay)\nDowntown(roddy)\nClausal(roddy)\nMaimed(roddy)\nBreathless(roddy)\nClausal(adela)\nRadial(adela)\nBreathless(adela)\nBreathless(gwen)\nDowntown(bay) -> Clausal(bay)\nforall x (Downtown(x) and Breathless(x) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Radial(x) -> Maimed(x))\nBreathless(adela) and Radial(adela) -> Clausal(adela)\nforall x (Radial(x) -> Downtown(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Breathless(x))\nforall x (Clausal(x) and Breathless(x) -> Radial(x))\n\nNice(gwen)\n\nNice(gwen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Henrieta is fifteen. Henrieta is handmade. Jermayne is fifteen. Jermayne is scandalous. Jermayne is caring. Jermayne is handmade. Maddi is scandalous. Maddi is attired. Maddi is handmade. Leonardo is handmade. If Henrieta is fifteen then Henrieta is scandalous. If something is fifteen and handmade then it is caring. Kind things are caring. If Maddi is handmade and Maddi is attired then Maddi is scandalous. If something is attired then it is fifteen. Red things are scandalous. If something is fifteen then it is handmade. Cold, handmade things are attired. Leonardo is not round.", "logic": "\nFifteen(henrieta)\nHandmade(henrieta)\nFifteen(jermayne)\nScandalous(jermayne)\nCaring(jermayne)\nHandmade(jermayne)\nScandalous(maddi)\nAttired(maddi)\nHandmade(maddi)\nHandmade(leonardo)\nFifteen(henrieta) -> Scandalous(henrieta)\nforall x (Fifteen(x) and Handmade(x) -> Caring(x))\nforall x (Attired(x) -> Caring(x))\nHandmade(maddi) and Attired(maddi) -> Scandalous(maddi)\nforall x (Attired(x) -> Fifteen(x))\nforall x (Handmade(x) -> Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Fifteen(x) -> Handmade(x))\nforall x (Scandalous(x) and Handmade(x) -> Attired(x))\n\nnot Round(leonardo)\n\nnot Round(leonardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Channa is meiotic. Channa is retractile. Lemmy is meiotic. Lemmy is effected. Lemmy is bullate. Lemmy is retractile. Linet is effected. Linet is awake. Linet is retractile. Ros is retractile. If Channa is meiotic then Channa is effected. If something is meiotic and retractile then it is bullate. Kind things are bullate. If Linet is retractile and Linet is awake then Linet is effected. If something is awake then it is meiotic. Red things are effected. If something is meiotic then it is retractile. Cold, retractile things are awake. Lemmy is round.", "logic": "\nMeiotic(channa)\nRetractile(channa)\nMeiotic(lemmy)\nEffected(lemmy)\nBullate(lemmy)\nRetractile(lemmy)\nEffected(linet)\nAwake(linet)\nRetractile(linet)\nRetractile(ros)\nMeiotic(channa) -> Effected(channa)\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Retractile(x) -> Bullate(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Bullate(x))\nRetractile(linet) and Awake(linet) -> Effected(linet)\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Meiotic(x))\nforall x (Retractile(x) -> Effected(x))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) -> Retractile(x))\nforall x (Effected(x) and Retractile(x) -> Awake(x))\n\nRound(lemmy)\n\nRound(lemmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Artie is venial. Artie is tripinnate. Barbey is venial. Barbey is rosaceous. Barbey is greasy. Barbey is tripinnate. Israel is rosaceous. Israel is entozoic. Israel is tripinnate. Hannah is tripinnate. If Artie is venial then Artie is rosaceous. If something is venial and tripinnate then it is greasy. Kind things are greasy. If Israel is tripinnate and Israel is entozoic then Israel is rosaceous. If something is entozoic then it is venial. Red things are rosaceous. If something is venial then it is tripinnate. Cold, tripinnate things are entozoic. Artie is not round.", "logic": "\nVenial(artie)\nTripinnate(artie)\nVenial(barbey)\nRosaceous(barbey)\nGreasy(barbey)\nTripinnate(barbey)\nRosaceous(israel)\nEntozoic(israel)\nTripinnate(israel)\nTripinnate(hannah)\nVenial(artie) -> Rosaceous(artie)\nforall x (Venial(x) and Tripinnate(x) -> Greasy(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) -> Greasy(x))\nTripinnate(israel) and Entozoic(israel) -> Rosaceous(israel)\nforall x (Entozoic(x) -> Venial(x))\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Venial(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) and Tripinnate(x) -> Entozoic(x))\n\nnot Round(artie)\n\nnot Round(artie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Melonie is amused. Melonie is hydroponic. Romola is amused. Romola is lopsided. Romola is subject. Romola is hydroponic. Barney is lopsided. Barney is grasslike. Barney is hydroponic. Joaquin is hydroponic. If Melonie is amused then Melonie is lopsided. If something is amused and hydroponic then it is subject. Kind things are subject. If Barney is hydroponic and Barney is grasslike then Barney is lopsided. If something is grasslike then it is amused. Red things are lopsided. If something is amused then it is hydroponic. Cold, hydroponic things are grasslike. Romola is nice.", "logic": "\nAmused(melonie)\nHydroponic(melonie)\nAmused(romola)\nLopsided(romola)\nSubject(romola)\nHydroponic(romola)\nLopsided(barney)\nGrasslike(barney)\nHydroponic(barney)\nHydroponic(joaquin)\nAmused(melonie) -> Lopsided(melonie)\nforall x (Amused(x) and Hydroponic(x) -> Subject(x))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Subject(x))\nHydroponic(barney) and Grasslike(barney) -> Lopsided(barney)\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Amused(x))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) and Hydroponic(x) -> Grasslike(x))\n\nNice(romola)\n\nNice(romola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Alyssa is repeatable. Alyssa is cheerless. Blisse is spiky. Blisse is not resentful. Blisse is cheerless. Britaney is repeatable. Britaney is spiky. Britaney is atonic. Aron is forensic. Aron is cheerless. If someone is cheerless and not forensic then they are not resentful. All cheerless people are repeatable. White people are not atonic. If Aron is forensic then Aron is resentful. If someone is cheerless and not atonic then they are spiky. If someone is atonic and not resentful then they are not telepathic. Britaney is repeatable.", "logic": "\nRepeatable(alyssa)\nCheerless(alyssa)\nSpiky(blisse)\nnot Resentful(blisse)\nCheerless(blisse)\nRepeatable(britaney)\nSpiky(britaney)\nAtonic(britaney)\nForensic(aron)\nCheerless(aron)\nforall x (Cheerless(x) and not Forensic(x) -> not Resentful(x))\nforall x (Cheerless(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Resentful(x) -> not Atonic(x))\nForensic(aron) -> Resentful(aron)\nforall x (Cheerless(x) and not Atonic(x) -> Spiky(x))\nforall x (Atonic(x) and not Resentful(x) -> not Telepathic(x))\n\nRepeatable(britaney)\n\ntherefore Repeatable(britaney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "David is interstate. David is slick. Joell is lxxxiv. Joell is not revolved. Joell is slick. Vachel is interstate. Vachel is lxxxiv. Vachel is xlvii. Andrus is agog. Andrus is slick. If someone is slick and not agog then they are not revolved. All slick people are interstate. White people are not xlvii. If Andrus is agog then Andrus is revolved. If someone is slick and not xlvii then they are lxxxiv. If someone is xlvii and not revolved then they are not riparian. David is not slick.", "logic": "\nInterstate(david)\nSlick(david)\nLxxxiv(joell)\nnot Revolved(joell)\nSlick(joell)\nInterstate(vachel)\nLxxxiv(vachel)\nXlvii(vachel)\nAgog(andrus)\nSlick(andrus)\nforall x (Slick(x) and not Agog(x) -> not Revolved(x))\nforall x (Slick(x) -> Interstate(x))\nforall x (Revolved(x) -> not Xlvii(x))\nAgog(andrus) -> Revolved(andrus)\nforall x (Slick(x) and not Xlvii(x) -> Lxxxiv(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and not Revolved(x) -> not Riparian(x))\n\nnot Slick(david)\n\ntherefore Slick(david)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Ellwood is jeweled. Ellwood is zolaesque. Gaven is blonde. Gaven is not humbling. Gaven is zolaesque. Moyna is jeweled. Moyna is blonde. Moyna is tolerant. Mimi is trabeate. Mimi is zolaesque. If someone is zolaesque and not trabeate then they are not humbling. All zolaesque people are jeweled. White people are not tolerant. If Mimi is trabeate then Mimi is humbling. If someone is zolaesque and not tolerant then they are blonde. If someone is tolerant and not humbling then they are not divisive. Gaven is jeweled.", "logic": "\nJeweled(ellwood)\nZolaesque(ellwood)\nBlonde(gaven)\nnot Humbling(gaven)\nZolaesque(gaven)\nJeweled(moyna)\nBlonde(moyna)\nTolerant(moyna)\nTrabeate(mimi)\nZolaesque(mimi)\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) and not Trabeate(x) -> not Humbling(x))\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Humbling(x) -> not Tolerant(x))\nTrabeate(mimi) -> Humbling(mimi)\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) and not Tolerant(x) -> Blonde(x))\nforall x (Tolerant(x) and not Humbling(x) -> not Divisive(x))\n\nJeweled(gaven)\n\nZolaesque(gaven) and forall x (Zolaesque(x) -> Jeweled(x)) -> therefore Jeweled(gaven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Augusta is maggoty. Augusta is negligent. Florina is bracing. Florina is not conical. Florina is negligent. Nanete is maggoty. Nanete is bracing. Nanete is cubital. Nissa is lissom. Nissa is negligent. If someone is negligent and not lissom then they are not conical. All negligent people are maggoty. White people are not cubital. If Nissa is lissom then Nissa is conical. If someone is negligent and not cubital then they are bracing. If someone is cubital and not conical then they are not slithering. Nissa is not conical.", "logic": "\nMaggoty(augusta)\nNegligent(augusta)\nBracing(florina)\nnot Conical(florina)\nNegligent(florina)\nMaggoty(nanete)\nBracing(nanete)\nCubital(nanete)\nLissom(nissa)\nNegligent(nissa)\nforall x (Negligent(x) and not Lissom(x) -> not Conical(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Conical(x) -> not Cubital(x))\nLissom(nissa) -> Conical(nissa)\nforall x (Negligent(x) and not Cubital(x) -> Bracing(x))\nforall x (Cubital(x) and not Conical(x) -> not Slithering(x))\n\nnot Conical(nissa)\n\nLissom(nissa) and Lissom(nissa) -> Conical(nissa) -> therefore Conical(nissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Amabelle is alleviated. Amabelle is vegetal. Jacenta is seeming. Jacenta is not ceaseless. Jacenta is vegetal. Lanna is alleviated. Lanna is seeming. Lanna is bulky. Rustie is untracked. Rustie is vegetal. If someone is vegetal and not untracked then they are not ceaseless. All vegetal people are alleviated. White people are not bulky. If Rustie is untracked then Rustie is ceaseless. If someone is vegetal and not bulky then they are seeming. If someone is bulky and not ceaseless then they are not attractive. Rustie is not bulky.", "logic": "\nAlleviated(amabelle)\nVegetal(amabelle)\nSeeming(jacenta)\nnot Ceaseless(jacenta)\nVegetal(jacenta)\nAlleviated(lanna)\nSeeming(lanna)\nBulky(lanna)\nUntracked(rustie)\nVegetal(rustie)\nforall x (Vegetal(x) and not Untracked(x) -> not Ceaseless(x))\nforall x (Vegetal(x) -> Alleviated(x))\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) -> not Bulky(x))\nUntracked(rustie) -> Ceaseless(rustie)\nforall x (Vegetal(x) and not Bulky(x) -> Seeming(x))\nforall x (Bulky(x) and not Ceaseless(x) -> not Attractive(x))\n\nnot Bulky(rustie)\n\nUntracked(rustie) and Untracked(rustie) -> Ceaseless(rustie) -> therefore Ceaseless(rustie) Ceaseless(rustie) and forall x (Ceaseless(x) -> not Bulky(x)) -> therefore not Bulky(rustie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Laural is unwitting. Laural is gripping. Terry is kuwaiti. Terry is not unfit. Terry is gripping. Sybyl is unwitting. Sybyl is kuwaiti. Sybyl is unary. Caralie is unmediated. Caralie is gripping. If someone is gripping and not unmediated then they are not unfit. All gripping people are unwitting. White people are not unary. If Caralie is unmediated then Caralie is unfit. If someone is gripping and not unary then they are kuwaiti. If someone is unary and not unfit then they are not masculine. Caralie is unary.", "logic": "\nUnwitting(laural)\nGripping(laural)\nKuwaiti(terry)\nnot Unfit(terry)\nGripping(terry)\nUnwitting(sybyl)\nKuwaiti(sybyl)\nUnary(sybyl)\nUnmediated(caralie)\nGripping(caralie)\nforall x (Gripping(x) and not Unmediated(x) -> not Unfit(x))\nforall x (Gripping(x) -> Unwitting(x))\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> not Unary(x))\nUnmediated(caralie) -> Unfit(caralie)\nforall x (Gripping(x) and not Unary(x) -> Kuwaiti(x))\nforall x (Unary(x) and not Unfit(x) -> not Masculine(x))\n\nUnary(caralie)\n\nUnmediated(caralie) and Unmediated(caralie) -> Unfit(caralie) -> therefore Unfit(caralie) Unfit(caralie) and forall x (Unfit(x) -> not Unary(x)) -> therefore not Unary(caralie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Ezekiel is warm. Ezekiel is apish. Hiralal is malign. Hiralal is not pugnacious. Hiralal is apish. Susie is warm. Susie is malign. Susie is primaeval. Cami is wheezing. Cami is apish. If someone is apish and not wheezing then they are not pugnacious. All apish people are warm. White people are not primaeval. If Cami is wheezing then Cami is pugnacious. If someone is apish and not primaeval then they are malign. If someone is primaeval and not pugnacious then they are not cephalic. Cami is malign.", "logic": "\nWarm(ezekiel)\nApish(ezekiel)\nMalign(hiralal)\nnot Pugnacious(hiralal)\nApish(hiralal)\nWarm(susie)\nMalign(susie)\nPrimaeval(susie)\nWheezing(cami)\nApish(cami)\nforall x (Apish(x) and not Wheezing(x) -> not Pugnacious(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) -> Warm(x))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) -> not Primaeval(x))\nWheezing(cami) -> Pugnacious(cami)\nforall x (Apish(x) and not Primaeval(x) -> Malign(x))\nforall x (Primaeval(x) and not Pugnacious(x) -> not Cephalic(x))\n\nMalign(cami)\n\nWheezing(cami) and Wheezing(cami) -> Pugnacious(cami) -> therefore Pugnacious(cami) Pugnacious(cami) and forall x (Pugnacious(x) -> not Primaeval(x)) -> therefore not Primaeval(cami) Apish(cami) and not Primaeval(cami) and forall x (Apish(x) and not Primaeval(x) -> Malign(x)) -> therefore Malign(cami)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Ivan is tight. Ivan is tongued. Tobin is cognizant. Tobin is not gossipy. Tobin is tongued. Sandie is tight. Sandie is cognizant. Sandie is repentant. Brianna is lobar. Brianna is tongued. If someone is tongued and not lobar then they are not gossipy. All tongued people are tight. White people are not repentant. If Brianna is lobar then Brianna is gossipy. If someone is tongued and not repentant then they are cognizant. If someone is repentant and not gossipy then they are not sabahan. Brianna is not cognizant.", "logic": "\nTight(ivan)\nTongued(ivan)\nCognizant(tobin)\nnot Gossipy(tobin)\nTongued(tobin)\nTight(sandie)\nCognizant(sandie)\nRepentant(sandie)\nLobar(brianna)\nTongued(brianna)\nforall x (Tongued(x) and not Lobar(x) -> not Gossipy(x))\nforall x (Tongued(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Gossipy(x) -> not Repentant(x))\nLobar(brianna) -> Gossipy(brianna)\nforall x (Tongued(x) and not Repentant(x) -> Cognizant(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) and not Gossipy(x) -> not Sabahan(x))\n\nnot Cognizant(brianna)\n\nLobar(brianna) and Lobar(brianna) -> Gossipy(brianna) -> therefore Gossipy(brianna) Gossipy(brianna) and forall x (Gossipy(x) -> not Repentant(x)) -> therefore not Repentant(brianna) Tongued(brianna) and not Repentant(brianna) and forall x (Tongued(x) and not Repentant(x) -> Cognizant(x)) -> therefore Cognizant(brianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Opal is conductive. Opal is voiceless. Barnebas is arillate. Barnebas is not unwoven. Barnebas is voiceless. Violet is conductive. Violet is arillate. Violet is larval. Gay is whatsoever. Gay is voiceless. If someone is voiceless and not whatsoever then they are not unwoven. All voiceless people are conductive. White people are not larval. If Gay is whatsoever then Gay is unwoven. If someone is voiceless and not larval then they are arillate. If someone is larval and not unwoven then they are not inhumed. Opal is not arillate.", "logic": "\nConductive(opal)\nVoiceless(opal)\nArillate(barnebas)\nnot Unwoven(barnebas)\nVoiceless(barnebas)\nConductive(violet)\nArillate(violet)\nLarval(violet)\nWhatsoever(gay)\nVoiceless(gay)\nforall x (Voiceless(x) and not Whatsoever(x) -> not Unwoven(x))\nforall x (Voiceless(x) -> Conductive(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> not Larval(x))\nWhatsoever(gay) -> Unwoven(gay)\nforall x (Voiceless(x) and not Larval(x) -> Arillate(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) and not Unwoven(x) -> not Inhumed(x))\n\nnot Arillate(opal)\n\nforall x (Voiceless(x) and not Larval(x) -> Arillate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Riley is rubicund. Riley is partible. Yardley is shrubby. Yardley is not entozoic. Yardley is partible. Tillie is rubicund. Tillie is shrubby. Tillie is epilithic. Dinnie is spoilt. Dinnie is partible. If someone is partible and not spoilt then they are not entozoic. All partible people are rubicund. White people are not epilithic. If Dinnie is spoilt then Dinnie is entozoic. If someone is partible and not epilithic then they are shrubby. If someone is epilithic and not entozoic then they are not aerobiotic. Riley is entozoic.", "logic": "\nRubicund(riley)\nPartible(riley)\nShrubby(yardley)\nnot Entozoic(yardley)\nPartible(yardley)\nRubicund(tillie)\nShrubby(tillie)\nEpilithic(tillie)\nSpoilt(dinnie)\nPartible(dinnie)\nforall x (Partible(x) and not Spoilt(x) -> not Entozoic(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) -> not Epilithic(x))\nSpoilt(dinnie) -> Entozoic(dinnie)\nforall x (Partible(x) and not Epilithic(x) -> Shrubby(x))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) and not Entozoic(x) -> not Aerobiotic(x))\n\nEntozoic(riley)\n\nEntozoic(riley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Rita is unbridled. Rita is agrypnotic. Wilone is unordered. Wilone is not disjunct. Wilone is agrypnotic. Sabina is unbridled. Sabina is unordered. Sabina is medusoid. Caryl is windy. Caryl is agrypnotic. If someone is agrypnotic and not windy then they are not disjunct. All agrypnotic people are unbridled. White people are not medusoid. If Caryl is windy then Caryl is disjunct. If someone is agrypnotic and not medusoid then they are unordered. If someone is medusoid and not disjunct then they are not livid. Sabina is not livid.", "logic": "\nUnbridled(rita)\nAgrypnotic(rita)\nUnordered(wilone)\nnot Disjunct(wilone)\nAgrypnotic(wilone)\nUnbridled(sabina)\nUnordered(sabina)\nMedusoid(sabina)\nWindy(caryl)\nAgrypnotic(caryl)\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) and not Windy(x) -> not Disjunct(x))\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nforall x (Disjunct(x) -> not Medusoid(x))\nWindy(caryl) -> Disjunct(caryl)\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) and not Medusoid(x) -> Unordered(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) and not Disjunct(x) -> not Livid(x))\n\nnot Livid(sabina)\n\nnot Livid(sabina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Nikkie is phonetic. Nikkie is perfervid. Nerty is jumentous. Nerty is not mercantile. Nerty is perfervid. Laurens is phonetic. Laurens is jumentous. Laurens is starchless. Valencia is xxxii. Valencia is perfervid. If someone is perfervid and not xxxii then they are not mercantile. All perfervid people are phonetic. White people are not starchless. If Valencia is xxxii then Valencia is mercantile. If someone is perfervid and not starchless then they are jumentous. If someone is starchless and not mercantile then they are not mesial. Laurens is perfervid.", "logic": "\nPhonetic(nikkie)\nPerfervid(nikkie)\nJumentous(nerty)\nnot Mercantile(nerty)\nPerfervid(nerty)\nPhonetic(laurens)\nJumentous(laurens)\nStarchless(laurens)\nXxxii(valencia)\nPerfervid(valencia)\nforall x (Perfervid(x) and not Xxxii(x) -> not Mercantile(x))\nforall x (Perfervid(x) -> Phonetic(x))\nforall x (Mercantile(x) -> not Starchless(x))\nXxxii(valencia) -> Mercantile(valencia)\nforall x (Perfervid(x) and not Starchless(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Starchless(x) and not Mercantile(x) -> not Mesial(x))\n\nPerfervid(laurens)\n\nPerfervid(laurens) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Saxon is slimy. Saxon is chadian. Dynah is unploughed. Dynah is not antimonial. Dynah is chadian. Barnard is slimy. Barnard is unploughed. Barnard is ictal. Theresita is revengeful. Theresita is chadian. If someone is chadian and not revengeful then they are not antimonial. All chadian people are slimy. White people are not ictal. If Theresita is revengeful then Theresita is antimonial. If someone is chadian and not ictal then they are unploughed. If someone is ictal and not antimonial then they are not noncausal. Dynah is not revengeful.", "logic": "\nSlimy(saxon)\nChadian(saxon)\nUnploughed(dynah)\nnot Antimonial(dynah)\nChadian(dynah)\nSlimy(barnard)\nUnploughed(barnard)\nIctal(barnard)\nRevengeful(theresita)\nChadian(theresita)\nforall x (Chadian(x) and not Revengeful(x) -> not Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Chadian(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> not Ictal(x))\nRevengeful(theresita) -> Antimonial(theresita)\nforall x (Chadian(x) and not Ictal(x) -> Unploughed(x))\nforall x (Ictal(x) and not Antimonial(x) -> not Noncausal(x))\n\nnot Revengeful(dynah)\n\nnot Revengeful(dynah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Haleigh is eonian. Haleigh is hilly. Tobin is numb. Tobin is not authorized. Tobin is hilly. Willis is eonian. Willis is numb. Willis is busy. Esma is ribald. Esma is hilly. If someone is hilly and not ribald then they are not authorized. All hilly people are eonian. White people are not busy. If Esma is ribald then Esma is authorized. If someone is hilly and not busy then they are numb. If someone is busy and not authorized then they are not friable. Willis is ribald.", "logic": "\nEonian(haleigh)\nHilly(haleigh)\nNumb(tobin)\nnot Authorized(tobin)\nHilly(tobin)\nEonian(willis)\nNumb(willis)\nBusy(willis)\nRibald(esma)\nHilly(esma)\nforall x (Hilly(x) and not Ribald(x) -> not Authorized(x))\nforall x (Hilly(x) -> Eonian(x))\nforall x (Authorized(x) -> not Busy(x))\nRibald(esma) -> Authorized(esma)\nforall x (Hilly(x) and not Busy(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Busy(x) and not Authorized(x) -> not Friable(x))\n\nRibald(willis)\n\nRibald(willis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Rayshell is theoretic. Rayshell is fastened. Nadya is protean. Nadya is not motivative. Nadya is fastened. Annissa is theoretic. Annissa is protean. Annissa is remediable. Aditya is coercive. Aditya is fastened. If someone is fastened and not coercive then they are not motivative. All fastened people are theoretic. White people are not remediable. If Aditya is coercive then Aditya is motivative. If someone is fastened and not remediable then they are protean. If someone is remediable and not motivative then they are not decreed. Annissa is not motivative.", "logic": "\nTheoretic(rayshell)\nFastened(rayshell)\nProtean(nadya)\nnot Motivative(nadya)\nFastened(nadya)\nTheoretic(annissa)\nProtean(annissa)\nRemediable(annissa)\nCoercive(aditya)\nFastened(aditya)\nforall x (Fastened(x) and not Coercive(x) -> not Motivative(x))\nforall x (Fastened(x) -> Theoretic(x))\nforall x (Motivative(x) -> not Remediable(x))\nCoercive(aditya) -> Motivative(aditya)\nforall x (Fastened(x) and not Remediable(x) -> Protean(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) and not Motivative(x) -> not Decreed(x))\n\nnot Motivative(annissa)\n\nnot Motivative(annissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Lora is raining. Lora is antipodal. Kirbee is pedantic. Kirbee is not worrisome. Kirbee is antipodal. Anthe is raining. Anthe is pedantic. Anthe is hygienic. Barty is hexangular. Barty is antipodal. If someone is antipodal and not hexangular then they are not worrisome. All antipodal people are raining. White people are not hygienic. If Barty is hexangular then Barty is worrisome. If someone is antipodal and not hygienic then they are pedantic. If someone is hygienic and not worrisome then they are not gone. Barty is gone.", "logic": "\nRaining(lora)\nAntipodal(lora)\nPedantic(kirbee)\nnot Worrisome(kirbee)\nAntipodal(kirbee)\nRaining(anthe)\nPedantic(anthe)\nHygienic(anthe)\nHexangular(barty)\nAntipodal(barty)\nforall x (Antipodal(x) and not Hexangular(x) -> not Worrisome(x))\nforall x (Antipodal(x) -> Raining(x))\nforall x (Worrisome(x) -> not Hygienic(x))\nHexangular(barty) -> Worrisome(barty)\nforall x (Antipodal(x) and not Hygienic(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Hygienic(x) and not Worrisome(x) -> not Gone(x))\n\nGone(barty)\n\nGone(barty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "The steffie freeze the sella. The steffie is restricted. The steffie is coruscant. The steffie is tottery. The steffie acetylate the sella. The steffie cere the sella. The sella freeze the steffie. The sella is macerative. The sella acetylate the steffie. The sella cere the steffie. If someone acetylate the sella then they are tottery. If someone is restricted then they visit the steffie. If someone freeze the steffie and the steffie is macerative then they visit the sella. If someone freeze the sella and they chase the steffie then they see the sella. If someone freeze the steffie then they chase the sella. If someone is coruscant and they visit the sella then the sella cere the steffie. The steffie is coruscant.", "logic": "\nFreeze(steffie, sella)\nRestricted(steffie)\nCoruscant(steffie)\nTottery(steffie)\nAcetylate(steffie, sella)\nCere(steffie, sella)\nFreeze(sella, steffie)\nMacerative(sella)\nAcetylate(sella, steffie)\nCere(sella, steffie)\nforall x (Acetylate(x, sella) -> Tottery(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Cere(x, steffie))\nforall x (Freeze(x, steffie) and Macerative(steffie) -> Cere(x, sella))\nforall x (Freeze(x, sella) and Freeze(x, steffie) -> Acetylate(x, sella))\nforall x (Freeze(x, steffie) -> Freeze(x, sella))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) and Cere(x, sella) -> Cere(sella, steffie))\n\nCoruscant(steffie)\n\ntherefore Coruscant(steffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The theodosia romance the palmer. The theodosia is full. The theodosia is excrescent. The theodosia is ashen. The theodosia anatomize the palmer. The theodosia reanimate the palmer. The palmer romance the theodosia. The palmer is disturbed. The palmer anatomize the theodosia. The palmer reanimate the theodosia. If someone anatomize the palmer then they are ashen. If someone is full then they visit the theodosia. If someone romance the theodosia and the theodosia is disturbed then they visit the palmer. If someone romance the palmer and they chase the theodosia then they see the palmer. If someone romance the theodosia then they chase the palmer. If someone is excrescent and they visit the palmer then the palmer reanimate the theodosia. The theodosia does not visit the palmer.", "logic": "\nRomance(theodosia, palmer)\nFull(theodosia)\nExcrescent(theodosia)\nAshen(theodosia)\nAnatomize(theodosia, palmer)\nReanimate(theodosia, palmer)\nRomance(palmer, theodosia)\nDisturbed(palmer)\nAnatomize(palmer, theodosia)\nReanimate(palmer, theodosia)\nforall x (Anatomize(x, palmer) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Full(x) -> Reanimate(x, theodosia))\nforall x (Romance(x, theodosia) and Disturbed(theodosia) -> Reanimate(x, palmer))\nforall x (Romance(x, palmer) and Romance(x, theodosia) -> Anatomize(x, palmer))\nforall x (Romance(x, theodosia) -> Romance(x, palmer))\nforall x (Excrescent(x) and Reanimate(x, palmer) -> Reanimate(palmer, theodosia))\n\nnot Reanimate(theodosia, palmer)\n\ntherefore Reanimate(theodosia, palmer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The scot sanctify the duffie. The scot is bicornuate. The scot is faultless. The scot is rumbling. The scot frizzle the duffie. The scot fart the duffie. The duffie sanctify the scot. The duffie is patent. The duffie frizzle the scot. The duffie fart the scot. If someone frizzle the duffie then they are rumbling. If someone is bicornuate then they visit the scot. If someone sanctify the scot and the scot is patent then they visit the duffie. If someone sanctify the duffie and they chase the scot then they see the duffie. If someone sanctify the scot then they chase the duffie. If someone is faultless and they visit the duffie then the duffie fart the scot. The duffie sanctify the duffie.", "logic": "\nSanctify(scot, duffie)\nBicornuate(scot)\nFaultless(scot)\nRumbling(scot)\nFrizzle(scot, duffie)\nFart(scot, duffie)\nSanctify(duffie, scot)\nPatent(duffie)\nFrizzle(duffie, scot)\nFart(duffie, scot)\nforall x (Frizzle(x, duffie) -> Rumbling(x))\nforall x (Bicornuate(x) -> Fart(x, scot))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, scot) and Patent(scot) -> Fart(x, duffie))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, duffie) and Sanctify(x, scot) -> Frizzle(x, duffie))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, scot) -> Sanctify(x, duffie))\nforall x (Faultless(x) and Fart(x, duffie) -> Fart(duffie, scot))\n\nSanctify(duffie, duffie)\n\nSanctify(duffie, scot) and forall x (Sanctify(x, scot) -> Sanctify(x, duffie)) -> therefore Sanctify(duffie, duffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The alonzo restrict the jeri. The alonzo is connected. The alonzo is asocial. The alonzo is bronzed. The alonzo redo the jeri. The alonzo segment the jeri. The jeri restrict the alonzo. The jeri is unsmiling. The jeri redo the alonzo. The jeri segment the alonzo. If someone redo the jeri then they are bronzed. If someone is connected then they visit the alonzo. If someone restrict the alonzo and the alonzo is unsmiling then they visit the jeri. If someone restrict the jeri and they chase the alonzo then they see the jeri. If someone restrict the alonzo then they chase the jeri. If someone is asocial and they visit the jeri then the jeri segment the alonzo. The jeri does not chase the jeri.", "logic": "\nRestrict(alonzo, jeri)\nConnected(alonzo)\nAsocial(alonzo)\nBronzed(alonzo)\nRedo(alonzo, jeri)\nSegment(alonzo, jeri)\nRestrict(jeri, alonzo)\nUnsmiling(jeri)\nRedo(jeri, alonzo)\nSegment(jeri, alonzo)\nforall x (Redo(x, jeri) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Connected(x) -> Segment(x, alonzo))\nforall x (Restrict(x, alonzo) and Unsmiling(alonzo) -> Segment(x, jeri))\nforall x (Restrict(x, jeri) and Restrict(x, alonzo) -> Redo(x, jeri))\nforall x (Restrict(x, alonzo) -> Restrict(x, jeri))\nforall x (Asocial(x) and Segment(x, jeri) -> Segment(jeri, alonzo))\n\nnot Restrict(jeri, jeri)\n\nRestrict(jeri, alonzo) and forall x (Restrict(x, alonzo) -> Restrict(x, jeri)) -> therefore Restrict(jeri, jeri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The kamillah federate the shaylah. The kamillah is homelike. The kamillah is saxicolous. The kamillah is crushed. The kamillah fund the shaylah. The kamillah liquidize the shaylah. The shaylah federate the kamillah. The shaylah is clogging. The shaylah fund the kamillah. The shaylah liquidize the kamillah. If someone fund the shaylah then they are crushed. If someone is homelike then they visit the kamillah. If someone federate the kamillah and the kamillah is clogging then they visit the shaylah. If someone federate the shaylah and they chase the kamillah then they see the shaylah. If someone federate the kamillah then they chase the shaylah. If someone is saxicolous and they visit the shaylah then the shaylah liquidize the kamillah. The shaylah fund the shaylah.", "logic": "\nFederate(kamillah, shaylah)\nHomelike(kamillah)\nSaxicolous(kamillah)\nCrushed(kamillah)\nFund(kamillah, shaylah)\nLiquidize(kamillah, shaylah)\nFederate(shaylah, kamillah)\nClogging(shaylah)\nFund(shaylah, kamillah)\nLiquidize(shaylah, kamillah)\nforall x (Fund(x, shaylah) -> Crushed(x))\nforall x (Homelike(x) -> Liquidize(x, kamillah))\nforall x (Federate(x, kamillah) and Clogging(kamillah) -> Liquidize(x, shaylah))\nforall x (Federate(x, shaylah) and Federate(x, kamillah) -> Fund(x, shaylah))\nforall x (Federate(x, kamillah) -> Federate(x, shaylah))\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Liquidize(x, shaylah) -> Liquidize(shaylah, kamillah))\n\nFund(shaylah, shaylah)\n\nFederate(shaylah, kamillah) and forall x (Federate(x, kamillah) -> Federate(x, shaylah)) -> therefore Federate(shaylah, shaylah) Federate(shaylah, shaylah) and Federate(shaylah, kamillah) and forall x (Federate(x, shaylah) and Federate(x, kamillah) -> Fund(x, shaylah)) -> therefore Fund(shaylah, shaylah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The siana enamor the austin. The siana is propitious. The siana is unstressed. The siana is netted. The siana fizzle the austin. The siana wrong the austin. The austin enamor the siana. The austin is hungry. The austin fizzle the siana. The austin wrong the siana. If someone fizzle the austin then they are netted. If someone is propitious then they visit the siana. If someone enamor the siana and the siana is hungry then they visit the austin. If someone enamor the austin and they chase the siana then they see the austin. If someone enamor the siana then they chase the austin. If someone is unstressed and they visit the austin then the austin wrong the siana. The austin does not see the austin.", "logic": "\nEnamor(siana, austin)\nPropitious(siana)\nUnstressed(siana)\nNetted(siana)\nFizzle(siana, austin)\nWrong(siana, austin)\nEnamor(austin, siana)\nHungry(austin)\nFizzle(austin, siana)\nWrong(austin, siana)\nforall x (Fizzle(x, austin) -> Netted(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Wrong(x, siana))\nforall x (Enamor(x, siana) and Hungry(siana) -> Wrong(x, austin))\nforall x (Enamor(x, austin) and Enamor(x, siana) -> Fizzle(x, austin))\nforall x (Enamor(x, siana) -> Enamor(x, austin))\nforall x (Unstressed(x) and Wrong(x, austin) -> Wrong(austin, siana))\n\nnot Fizzle(austin, austin)\n\nEnamor(austin, siana) and forall x (Enamor(x, siana) -> Enamor(x, austin)) -> therefore Enamor(austin, austin) Enamor(austin, austin) and Enamor(austin, siana) and forall x (Enamor(x, austin) and Enamor(x, siana) -> Fizzle(x, austin)) -> therefore Fizzle(austin, austin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The kaitlyn entitle the raina. The kaitlyn is grabby. The kaitlyn is thankless. The kaitlyn is lidded. The kaitlyn scum the raina. The kaitlyn damage the raina. The raina entitle the kaitlyn. The raina is underage. The raina scum the kaitlyn. The raina damage the kaitlyn. If someone scum the raina then they are lidded. If someone is grabby then they visit the kaitlyn. If someone entitle the kaitlyn and the kaitlyn is underage then they visit the raina. If someone entitle the raina and they chase the kaitlyn then they see the raina. If someone entitle the kaitlyn then they chase the raina. If someone is thankless and they visit the raina then the raina damage the kaitlyn. The raina is lidded.", "logic": "\nEntitle(kaitlyn, raina)\nGrabby(kaitlyn)\nThankless(kaitlyn)\nLidded(kaitlyn)\nScum(kaitlyn, raina)\nDamage(kaitlyn, raina)\nEntitle(raina, kaitlyn)\nUnderage(raina)\nScum(raina, kaitlyn)\nDamage(raina, kaitlyn)\nforall x (Scum(x, raina) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Grabby(x) -> Damage(x, kaitlyn))\nforall x (Entitle(x, kaitlyn) and Underage(kaitlyn) -> Damage(x, raina))\nforall x (Entitle(x, raina) and Entitle(x, kaitlyn) -> Scum(x, raina))\nforall x (Entitle(x, kaitlyn) -> Entitle(x, raina))\nforall x (Thankless(x) and Damage(x, raina) -> Damage(raina, kaitlyn))\n\nLidded(raina)\n\nEntitle(raina, kaitlyn) and forall x (Entitle(x, kaitlyn) -> Entitle(x, raina)) -> therefore Entitle(raina, raina) Entitle(raina, raina) and Entitle(raina, kaitlyn) and forall x (Entitle(x, raina) and Entitle(x, kaitlyn) -> Scum(x, raina)) -> therefore Scum(raina, raina) Scum(raina, raina) and forall x (Scum(x, raina) -> Lidded(x)) -> therefore Lidded(raina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The myke rivet the vanna. The myke is petrous. The myke is meddling. The myke is worshipful. The myke draggle the vanna. The myke subjoin the vanna. The vanna rivet the myke. The vanna is holophytic. The vanna draggle the myke. The vanna subjoin the myke. If someone draggle the vanna then they are worshipful. If someone is petrous then they visit the myke. If someone rivet the myke and the myke is holophytic then they visit the vanna. If someone rivet the vanna and they chase the myke then they see the vanna. If someone rivet the myke then they chase the vanna. If someone is meddling and they visit the vanna then the vanna subjoin the myke. The vanna is not worshipful.", "logic": "\nRivet(myke, vanna)\nPetrous(myke)\nMeddling(myke)\nWorshipful(myke)\nDraggle(myke, vanna)\nSubjoin(myke, vanna)\nRivet(vanna, myke)\nHolophytic(vanna)\nDraggle(vanna, myke)\nSubjoin(vanna, myke)\nforall x (Draggle(x, vanna) -> Worshipful(x))\nforall x (Petrous(x) -> Subjoin(x, myke))\nforall x (Rivet(x, myke) and Holophytic(myke) -> Subjoin(x, vanna))\nforall x (Rivet(x, vanna) and Rivet(x, myke) -> Draggle(x, vanna))\nforall x (Rivet(x, myke) -> Rivet(x, vanna))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and Subjoin(x, vanna) -> Subjoin(vanna, myke))\n\nnot Worshipful(vanna)\n\nRivet(vanna, myke) and forall x (Rivet(x, myke) -> Rivet(x, vanna)) -> therefore Rivet(vanna, vanna) Rivet(vanna, vanna) and Rivet(vanna, myke) and forall x (Rivet(x, vanna) and Rivet(x, myke) -> Draggle(x, vanna)) -> therefore Draggle(vanna, vanna) Draggle(vanna, vanna) and forall x (Draggle(x, vanna) -> Worshipful(x)) -> therefore Worshipful(vanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The britta sulfur the elinor. The britta is temptable. The britta is sedative. The britta is sinusoidal. The britta beget the elinor. The britta douse the elinor. The elinor sulfur the britta. The elinor is etched. The elinor beget the britta. The elinor douse the britta. If someone beget the elinor then they are sinusoidal. If someone is temptable then they visit the britta. If someone sulfur the britta and the britta is etched then they visit the elinor. If someone sulfur the elinor and they chase the britta then they see the elinor. If someone sulfur the britta then they chase the elinor. If someone is sedative and they visit the elinor then the elinor douse the britta. The elinor does not visit the elinor.", "logic": "\nSulfur(britta, elinor)\nTemptable(britta)\nSedative(britta)\nSinusoidal(britta)\nBeget(britta, elinor)\nDouse(britta, elinor)\nSulfur(elinor, britta)\nEtched(elinor)\nBeget(elinor, britta)\nDouse(elinor, britta)\nforall x (Beget(x, elinor) -> Sinusoidal(x))\nforall x (Temptable(x) -> Douse(x, britta))\nforall x (Sulfur(x, britta) and Etched(britta) -> Douse(x, elinor))\nforall x (Sulfur(x, elinor) and Sulfur(x, britta) -> Beget(x, elinor))\nforall x (Sulfur(x, britta) -> Sulfur(x, elinor))\nforall x (Sedative(x) and Douse(x, elinor) -> Douse(elinor, britta))\n\nnot Douse(elinor, elinor)\n\nforall x (Sulfur(x, britta) and Etched(britta) -> Douse(x, elinor)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The ethelbert centrifuge the juditha. The ethelbert is quiescent. The ethelbert is slaphappy. The ethelbert is moony. The ethelbert forbear the juditha. The ethelbert remain the juditha. The juditha centrifuge the ethelbert. The juditha is innovative. The juditha forbear the ethelbert. The juditha remain the ethelbert. If someone forbear the juditha then they are moony. If someone is quiescent then they visit the ethelbert. If someone centrifuge the ethelbert and the ethelbert is innovative then they visit the juditha. If someone centrifuge the juditha and they chase the ethelbert then they see the juditha. If someone centrifuge the ethelbert then they chase the juditha. If someone is slaphappy and they visit the juditha then the juditha remain the ethelbert. The juditha is slaphappy.", "logic": "\nCentrifuge(ethelbert, juditha)\nQuiescent(ethelbert)\nSlaphappy(ethelbert)\nMoony(ethelbert)\nForbear(ethelbert, juditha)\nRemain(ethelbert, juditha)\nCentrifuge(juditha, ethelbert)\nInnovative(juditha)\nForbear(juditha, ethelbert)\nRemain(juditha, ethelbert)\nforall x (Forbear(x, juditha) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) -> Remain(x, ethelbert))\nforall x (Centrifuge(x, ethelbert) and Innovative(ethelbert) -> Remain(x, juditha))\nforall x (Centrifuge(x, juditha) and Centrifuge(x, ethelbert) -> Forbear(x, juditha))\nforall x (Centrifuge(x, ethelbert) -> Centrifuge(x, juditha))\nforall x (Slaphappy(x) and Remain(x, juditha) -> Remain(juditha, ethelbert))\n\nSlaphappy(juditha)\n\nSlaphappy(juditha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The sidonnie colligate the lynnette. The sidonnie is mutative. The sidonnie is adept. The sidonnie is federated. The sidonnie claret the lynnette. The sidonnie limit the lynnette. The lynnette colligate the sidonnie. The lynnette is granulose. The lynnette claret the sidonnie. The lynnette limit the sidonnie. If someone claret the lynnette then they are federated. If someone is mutative then they visit the sidonnie. If someone colligate the sidonnie and the sidonnie is granulose then they visit the lynnette. If someone colligate the lynnette and they chase the sidonnie then they see the lynnette. If someone colligate the sidonnie then they chase the lynnette. If someone is adept and they visit the lynnette then the lynnette limit the sidonnie. The lynnette is not mutative.", "logic": "\nColligate(sidonnie, lynnette)\nMutative(sidonnie)\nAdept(sidonnie)\nFederated(sidonnie)\nClaret(sidonnie, lynnette)\nLimit(sidonnie, lynnette)\nColligate(lynnette, sidonnie)\nGranulose(lynnette)\nClaret(lynnette, sidonnie)\nLimit(lynnette, sidonnie)\nforall x (Claret(x, lynnette) -> Federated(x))\nforall x (Mutative(x) -> Limit(x, sidonnie))\nforall x (Colligate(x, sidonnie) and Granulose(sidonnie) -> Limit(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Colligate(x, lynnette) and Colligate(x, sidonnie) -> Claret(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Colligate(x, sidonnie) -> Colligate(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Adept(x) and Limit(x, lynnette) -> Limit(lynnette, sidonnie))\n\nnot Mutative(lynnette)\n\nnot Mutative(lynnette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The ricardo dizzy the cindy. The ricardo is haploidic. The ricardo is mediatory. The ricardo is hypnoid. The ricardo canvass the cindy. The ricardo record the cindy. The cindy dizzy the ricardo. The cindy is brushy. The cindy canvass the ricardo. The cindy record the ricardo. If someone canvass the cindy then they are hypnoid. If someone is haploidic then they visit the ricardo. If someone dizzy the ricardo and the ricardo is brushy then they visit the cindy. If someone dizzy the cindy and they chase the ricardo then they see the cindy. If someone dizzy the ricardo then they chase the cindy. If someone is mediatory and they visit the cindy then the cindy record the ricardo. The ricardo canvass the ricardo.", "logic": "\nDizzy(ricardo, cindy)\nHaploidic(ricardo)\nMediatory(ricardo)\nHypnoid(ricardo)\nCanvass(ricardo, cindy)\nRecord(ricardo, cindy)\nDizzy(cindy, ricardo)\nBrushy(cindy)\nCanvass(cindy, ricardo)\nRecord(cindy, ricardo)\nforall x (Canvass(x, cindy) -> Hypnoid(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Record(x, ricardo))\nforall x (Dizzy(x, ricardo) and Brushy(ricardo) -> Record(x, cindy))\nforall x (Dizzy(x, cindy) and Dizzy(x, ricardo) -> Canvass(x, cindy))\nforall x (Dizzy(x, ricardo) -> Dizzy(x, cindy))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) and Record(x, cindy) -> Record(cindy, ricardo))\n\nCanvass(ricardo, ricardo)\n\nCanvass(ricardo, ricardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The merralee defoliate the wyatan. The merralee is delimited. The merralee is ebracteate. The merralee is conversant. The merralee dally the wyatan. The merralee illegalize the wyatan. The wyatan defoliate the merralee. The wyatan is thirteenth. The wyatan dally the merralee. The wyatan illegalize the merralee. If someone dally the wyatan then they are conversant. If someone is delimited then they visit the merralee. If someone defoliate the merralee and the merralee is thirteenth then they visit the wyatan. If someone defoliate the wyatan and they chase the merralee then they see the wyatan. If someone defoliate the merralee then they chase the wyatan. If someone is ebracteate and they visit the wyatan then the wyatan illegalize the merralee. The merralee is not green.", "logic": "\nDefoliate(merralee, wyatan)\nDelimited(merralee)\nEbracteate(merralee)\nConversant(merralee)\nDally(merralee, wyatan)\nIllegalize(merralee, wyatan)\nDefoliate(wyatan, merralee)\nThirteenth(wyatan)\nDally(wyatan, merralee)\nIllegalize(wyatan, merralee)\nforall x (Dally(x, wyatan) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Delimited(x) -> Illegalize(x, merralee))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, merralee) and Thirteenth(merralee) -> Illegalize(x, wyatan))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, wyatan) and Defoliate(x, merralee) -> Dally(x, wyatan))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, merralee) -> Defoliate(x, wyatan))\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) and Illegalize(x, wyatan) -> Illegalize(wyatan, merralee))\n\nnot Green(merralee)\n\nnot Green(merralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The douggie ovulate the parke. The douggie is passee. The douggie is cracking. The douggie is liveborn. The douggie relinquish the parke. The douggie blat the parke. The parke ovulate the douggie. The parke is sunken. The parke relinquish the douggie. The parke blat the douggie. If someone relinquish the parke then they are liveborn. If someone is passee then they visit the douggie. If someone ovulate the douggie and the douggie is sunken then they visit the parke. If someone ovulate the parke and they chase the douggie then they see the parke. If someone ovulate the douggie then they chase the parke. If someone is cracking and they visit the parke then the parke blat the douggie. The douggie is sunken.", "logic": "\nOvulate(douggie, parke)\nPassee(douggie)\nCracking(douggie)\nLiveborn(douggie)\nRelinquish(douggie, parke)\nBlat(douggie, parke)\nOvulate(parke, douggie)\nSunken(parke)\nRelinquish(parke, douggie)\nBlat(parke, douggie)\nforall x (Relinquish(x, parke) -> Liveborn(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Blat(x, douggie))\nforall x (Ovulate(x, douggie) and Sunken(douggie) -> Blat(x, parke))\nforall x (Ovulate(x, parke) and Ovulate(x, douggie) -> Relinquish(x, parke))\nforall x (Ovulate(x, douggie) -> Ovulate(x, parke))\nforall x (Cracking(x) and Blat(x, parke) -> Blat(parke, douggie))\n\nSunken(douggie)\n\nSunken(douggie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The babita patrol the tildi. The babita is previous. The babita is rangy. The babita is astragalar. The babita blare the tildi. The babita rest the tildi. The tildi patrol the babita. The tildi is exemplary. The tildi blare the babita. The tildi rest the babita. If someone blare the tildi then they are astragalar. If someone is previous then they visit the babita. If someone patrol the babita and the babita is exemplary then they visit the tildi. If someone patrol the tildi and they chase the babita then they see the tildi. If someone patrol the babita then they chase the tildi. If someone is rangy and they visit the tildi then the tildi rest the babita. The babita does not chase the babita.", "logic": "\nPatrol(babita, tildi)\nPrevious(babita)\nRangy(babita)\nAstragalar(babita)\nBlare(babita, tildi)\nRest(babita, tildi)\nPatrol(tildi, babita)\nExemplary(tildi)\nBlare(tildi, babita)\nRest(tildi, babita)\nforall x (Blare(x, tildi) -> Astragalar(x))\nforall x (Previous(x) -> Rest(x, babita))\nforall x (Patrol(x, babita) and Exemplary(babita) -> Rest(x, tildi))\nforall x (Patrol(x, tildi) and Patrol(x, babita) -> Blare(x, tildi))\nforall x (Patrol(x, babita) -> Patrol(x, tildi))\nforall x (Rangy(x) and Rest(x, tildi) -> Rest(tildi, babita))\n\nnot Patrol(babita, babita)\n\nnot Patrol(babita, babita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The abigail dial the curt. The abigail is vestigial. The abigail is guided. The abigail is weighty. The abigail dose the curt. The abigail swan the curt. The curt dial the abigail. The curt is downcast. The curt dose the abigail. The curt swan the abigail. If someone dose the curt then they are weighty. If someone is vestigial then they visit the abigail. If someone dial the abigail and the abigail is downcast then they visit the curt. If someone dial the curt and they chase the abigail then they see the curt. If someone dial the abigail then they chase the curt. If someone is guided and they visit the curt then the curt swan the abigail. The curt is green.", "logic": "\nDial(abigail, curt)\nVestigial(abigail)\nGuided(abigail)\nWeighty(abigail)\nDose(abigail, curt)\nSwan(abigail, curt)\nDial(curt, abigail)\nDowncast(curt)\nDose(curt, abigail)\nSwan(curt, abigail)\nforall x (Dose(x, curt) -> Weighty(x))\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> Swan(x, abigail))\nforall x (Dial(x, abigail) and Downcast(abigail) -> Swan(x, curt))\nforall x (Dial(x, curt) and Dial(x, abigail) -> Dose(x, curt))\nforall x (Dial(x, abigail) -> Dial(x, curt))\nforall x (Guided(x) and Swan(x, curt) -> Swan(curt, abigail))\n\nGreen(curt)\n\nGreen(curt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "Louie is unmatched. Louie is deciding. Louie is retinal. Georgiana is decayed. Georgiana is synovial. Georgiana is acroscopic. Bab is decayed. Bab is synovial. Chevy is deciding. Chevy is synovial. Cold things are unmatched. All unmatched things are deciding. If something is decayed then it is deciding. Cold, antarctic things are retinal. Cold, antarctic things are synovial. All deciding, acroscopic things are antarctic. Georgiana is synovial.", "logic": "\nUnmatched(louie)\nDeciding(louie)\nRetinal(louie)\nDecayed(georgiana)\nSynovial(georgiana)\nAcroscopic(georgiana)\nDecayed(bab)\nSynovial(bab)\nDeciding(chevy)\nSynovial(chevy)\nforall x (Decayed(x) -> Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Decayed(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Decayed(x) and Antarctic(x) -> Retinal(x))\nforall x (Decayed(x) and Antarctic(x) -> Synovial(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Acroscopic(x) -> Antarctic(x))\n\nSynovial(georgiana)\n\ntherefore Synovial(georgiana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Windy is reniform. Windy is filthy. Windy is dusky. Charles is tusked. Charles is benzoic. Charles is flavourful. Darbie is tusked. Darbie is benzoic. Sherlock is filthy. Sherlock is benzoic. Cold things are reniform. All reniform things are filthy. If something is tusked then it is filthy. Cold, astomatal things are dusky. Cold, astomatal things are benzoic. All filthy, flavourful things are astomatal. Windy is not reniform.", "logic": "\nReniform(windy)\nFilthy(windy)\nDusky(windy)\nTusked(charles)\nBenzoic(charles)\nFlavourful(charles)\nTusked(darbie)\nBenzoic(darbie)\nFilthy(sherlock)\nBenzoic(sherlock)\nforall x (Tusked(x) -> Reniform(x))\nforall x (Reniform(x) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Tusked(x) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Tusked(x) and Astomatal(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Tusked(x) and Astomatal(x) -> Benzoic(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) and Flavourful(x) -> Astomatal(x))\n\nnot Reniform(windy)\n\ntherefore Reniform(windy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Vitoria is risen. Vitoria is decayable. Vitoria is prankish. Lucille is tiptop. Lucille is broadband. Lucille is tuscan. Layla is tiptop. Layla is broadband. Jerrine is decayable. Jerrine is broadband. Cold things are risen. All risen things are decayable. If something is tiptop then it is decayable. Cold, forehand things are prankish. Cold, forehand things are broadband. All decayable, tuscan things are forehand. Layla is risen.", "logic": "\nRisen(vitoria)\nDecayable(vitoria)\nPrankish(vitoria)\nTiptop(lucille)\nBroadband(lucille)\nTuscan(lucille)\nTiptop(layla)\nBroadband(layla)\nDecayable(jerrine)\nBroadband(jerrine)\nforall x (Tiptop(x) -> Risen(x))\nforall x (Risen(x) -> Decayable(x))\nforall x (Tiptop(x) -> Decayable(x))\nforall x (Tiptop(x) and Forehand(x) -> Prankish(x))\nforall x (Tiptop(x) and Forehand(x) -> Broadband(x))\nforall x (Decayable(x) and Tuscan(x) -> Forehand(x))\n\nRisen(layla)\n\nTiptop(layla) and forall x (Tiptop(x) -> Risen(x)) -> therefore Risen(layla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Keenan is clattery. Keenan is unemphatic. Keenan is pestering. Ariana is monastical. Ariana is heathen. Ariana is manlike. Leon is monastical. Leon is heathen. Elsy is unemphatic. Elsy is heathen. Cold things are clattery. All clattery things are unemphatic. If something is monastical then it is unemphatic. Cold, fated things are pestering. Cold, fated things are heathen. All unemphatic, manlike things are fated. Ariana is not clattery.", "logic": "\nClattery(keenan)\nUnemphatic(keenan)\nPestering(keenan)\nMonastical(ariana)\nHeathen(ariana)\nManlike(ariana)\nMonastical(leon)\nHeathen(leon)\nUnemphatic(elsy)\nHeathen(elsy)\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> Clattery(x))\nforall x (Clattery(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Monastical(x) and Fated(x) -> Pestering(x))\nforall x (Monastical(x) and Fated(x) -> Heathen(x))\nforall x (Unemphatic(x) and Manlike(x) -> Fated(x))\n\nnot Clattery(ariana)\n\nMonastical(ariana) and forall x (Monastical(x) -> Clattery(x)) -> therefore Clattery(ariana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Shaina is sabbatic. Shaina is vociferous. Shaina is bottom. Pansie is befitting. Pansie is coriaceous. Pansie is pyrolignic. Taffy is befitting. Taffy is coriaceous. Roddie is vociferous. Roddie is coriaceous. Cold things are sabbatic. All sabbatic things are vociferous. If something is befitting then it is vociferous. Cold, bipedal things are bottom. Cold, bipedal things are coriaceous. All vociferous, pyrolignic things are bipedal. Pansie is bipedal.", "logic": "\nSabbatic(shaina)\nVociferous(shaina)\nBottom(shaina)\nBefitting(pansie)\nCoriaceous(pansie)\nPyrolignic(pansie)\nBefitting(taffy)\nCoriaceous(taffy)\nVociferous(roddie)\nCoriaceous(roddie)\nforall x (Befitting(x) -> Sabbatic(x))\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Befitting(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Befitting(x) and Bipedal(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Befitting(x) and Bipedal(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Vociferous(x) and Pyrolignic(x) -> Bipedal(x))\n\nBipedal(pansie)\n\nBefitting(pansie) and forall x (Befitting(x) -> Vociferous(x)) -> therefore Vociferous(pansie) Vociferous(pansie) and Pyrolignic(pansie) and forall x (Vociferous(x) and Pyrolignic(x) -> Bipedal(x)) -> therefore Bipedal(pansie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Adey is chivalric. Adey is outspread. Adey is christian. Olia is declarable. Olia is elective. Olia is audacious. Milissent is declarable. Milissent is elective. Gabe is outspread. Gabe is elective. Cold things are chivalric. All chivalric things are outspread. If something is declarable then it is outspread. Cold, ungathered things are christian. Cold, ungathered things are elective. All outspread, audacious things are ungathered. Olia is not ungathered.", "logic": "\nChivalric(adey)\nOutspread(adey)\nChristian(adey)\nDeclarable(olia)\nElective(olia)\nAudacious(olia)\nDeclarable(milissent)\nElective(milissent)\nOutspread(gabe)\nElective(gabe)\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Chivalric(x))\nforall x (Chivalric(x) -> Outspread(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Outspread(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) and Ungathered(x) -> Christian(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) and Ungathered(x) -> Elective(x))\nforall x (Outspread(x) and Audacious(x) -> Ungathered(x))\n\nnot Ungathered(olia)\n\nDeclarable(olia) and forall x (Declarable(x) -> Outspread(x)) -> therefore Outspread(olia) Outspread(olia) and Audacious(olia) and forall x (Outspread(x) and Audacious(x) -> Ungathered(x)) -> therefore Ungathered(olia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Odetta is starred. Odetta is scoreless. Odetta is stiff. Ginnie is appellant. Ginnie is maniclike. Ginnie is aerial. Randolph is appellant. Randolph is maniclike. Garret is scoreless. Garret is maniclike. Cold things are starred. All starred things are scoreless. If something is appellant then it is scoreless. Cold, ottoman things are stiff. Cold, ottoman things are maniclike. All scoreless, aerial things are ottoman. Ginnie is stiff.", "logic": "\nStarred(odetta)\nScoreless(odetta)\nStiff(odetta)\nAppellant(ginnie)\nManiclike(ginnie)\nAerial(ginnie)\nAppellant(randolph)\nManiclike(randolph)\nScoreless(garret)\nManiclike(garret)\nforall x (Appellant(x) -> Starred(x))\nforall x (Starred(x) -> Scoreless(x))\nforall x (Appellant(x) -> Scoreless(x))\nforall x (Appellant(x) and Ottoman(x) -> Stiff(x))\nforall x (Appellant(x) and Ottoman(x) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Scoreless(x) and Aerial(x) -> Ottoman(x))\n\nStiff(ginnie)\n\nAppellant(ginnie) and forall x (Appellant(x) -> Scoreless(x)) -> therefore Scoreless(ginnie) Scoreless(ginnie) and Aerial(ginnie) and forall x (Scoreless(x) and Aerial(x) -> Ottoman(x)) -> therefore Ottoman(ginnie) Appellant(ginnie) and Ottoman(ginnie) and forall x (Appellant(x) and Ottoman(x) -> Stiff(x)) -> therefore Stiff(ginnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Herbie is cannular. Herbie is prideful. Herbie is prolate. Myrtice is optional. Myrtice is vestigial. Myrtice is cogent. Felicdad is optional. Felicdad is vestigial. Natalina is prideful. Natalina is vestigial. Cold things are cannular. All cannular things are prideful. If something is optional then it is prideful. Cold, nonverbal things are prolate. Cold, nonverbal things are vestigial. All prideful, cogent things are nonverbal. Myrtice is not prolate.", "logic": "\nCannular(herbie)\nPrideful(herbie)\nProlate(herbie)\nOptional(myrtice)\nVestigial(myrtice)\nCogent(myrtice)\nOptional(felicdad)\nVestigial(felicdad)\nPrideful(natalina)\nVestigial(natalina)\nforall x (Optional(x) -> Cannular(x))\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Prideful(x))\nforall x (Optional(x) -> Prideful(x))\nforall x (Optional(x) and Nonverbal(x) -> Prolate(x))\nforall x (Optional(x) and Nonverbal(x) -> Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) and Cogent(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\n\nnot Prolate(myrtice)\n\nOptional(myrtice) and forall x (Optional(x) -> Prideful(x)) -> therefore Prideful(myrtice) Prideful(myrtice) and Cogent(myrtice) and forall x (Prideful(x) and Cogent(x) -> Nonverbal(x)) -> therefore Nonverbal(myrtice) Optional(myrtice) and Nonverbal(myrtice) and forall x (Optional(x) and Nonverbal(x) -> Prolate(x)) -> therefore Prolate(myrtice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Loretta is ultimo. Loretta is orbiculate. Loretta is carpeted. Joye is hypnotized. Joye is bigeminal. Joye is vain. Cornelia is hypnotized. Cornelia is bigeminal. Filipe is orbiculate. Filipe is bigeminal. Cold things are ultimo. All ultimo things are orbiculate. If something is hypnotized then it is orbiculate. Cold, wholemeal things are carpeted. Cold, wholemeal things are bigeminal. All orbiculate, vain things are wholemeal. Filipe is not wholemeal.", "logic": "\nUltimo(loretta)\nOrbiculate(loretta)\nCarpeted(loretta)\nHypnotized(joye)\nBigeminal(joye)\nVain(joye)\nHypnotized(cornelia)\nBigeminal(cornelia)\nOrbiculate(filipe)\nBigeminal(filipe)\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nforall x (Ultimo(x) -> Orbiculate(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Orbiculate(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) and Wholemeal(x) -> Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) and Wholemeal(x) -> Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and Vain(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\n\nnot Wholemeal(filipe)\n\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and Vain(x) -> Wholemeal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Thorvald is calculated. Thorvald is untired. Thorvald is quaggy. Leighton is grand. Leighton is auriculate. Leighton is manichaean. Noell is grand. Noell is auriculate. Karon is untired. Karon is auriculate. Cold things are calculated. All calculated things are untired. If something is grand then it is untired. Cold, precursory things are quaggy. Cold, precursory things are auriculate. All untired, manichaean things are precursory. Karon is quaggy.", "logic": "\nCalculated(thorvald)\nUntired(thorvald)\nQuaggy(thorvald)\nGrand(leighton)\nAuriculate(leighton)\nManichaean(leighton)\nGrand(noell)\nAuriculate(noell)\nUntired(karon)\nAuriculate(karon)\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Calculated(x))\nforall x (Calculated(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) and Precursory(x) -> Quaggy(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) and Precursory(x) -> Auriculate(x))\nforall x (Untired(x) and Manichaean(x) -> Precursory(x))\n\nQuaggy(karon)\n\nforall x (Grand(x) and Precursory(x) -> Quaggy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Lola is gripping. Lola is hydroponic. Lola is pitiable. Alexi is womanly. Alexi is unyielding. Alexi is methodical. Alisun is womanly. Alisun is unyielding. Magdalena is hydroponic. Magdalena is unyielding. Cold things are gripping. All gripping things are hydroponic. If something is womanly then it is hydroponic. Cold, logistical things are pitiable. Cold, logistical things are unyielding. All hydroponic, methodical things are logistical. Alisun is not pitiable.", "logic": "\nGripping(lola)\nHydroponic(lola)\nPitiable(lola)\nWomanly(alexi)\nUnyielding(alexi)\nMethodical(alexi)\nWomanly(alisun)\nUnyielding(alisun)\nHydroponic(magdalena)\nUnyielding(magdalena)\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Gripping(x))\nforall x (Gripping(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Logistical(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Logistical(x) -> Unyielding(x))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) and Methodical(x) -> Logistical(x))\n\nnot Pitiable(alisun)\n\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Logistical(x) -> Pitiable(x)) <- forall x (Hydroponic(x) and Methodical(x) -> Logistical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Mella is winking. Mella is obsequious. Mella is unanalyzed. Jereme is elapsed. Jereme is useful. Jereme is effortful. Manuel is elapsed. Manuel is useful. Filide is obsequious. Filide is useful. Cold things are winking. All winking things are obsequious. If something is elapsed then it is obsequious. Cold, pink things are unanalyzed. Cold, pink things are useful. All obsequious, effortful things are pink. Mella is useful.", "logic": "\nWinking(mella)\nObsequious(mella)\nUnanalyzed(mella)\nElapsed(jereme)\nUseful(jereme)\nEffortful(jereme)\nElapsed(manuel)\nUseful(manuel)\nObsequious(filide)\nUseful(filide)\nforall x (Elapsed(x) -> Winking(x))\nforall x (Winking(x) -> Obsequious(x))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) -> Obsequious(x))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Pink(x) -> Unanalyzed(x))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Pink(x) -> Useful(x))\nforall x (Obsequious(x) and Effortful(x) -> Pink(x))\n\nUseful(mella)\n\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Pink(x) -> Useful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Rozanna is gradual. Rozanna is headlong. Rozanna is dietetical. Loreen is intolerant. Loreen is unremedied. Loreen is texan. Margit is intolerant. Margit is unremedied. Damon is headlong. Damon is unremedied. Cold things are gradual. All gradual things are headlong. If something is intolerant then it is headlong. Cold, hueless things are dietetical. Cold, hueless things are unremedied. All headlong, texan things are hueless. Rozanna is not texan.", "logic": "\nGradual(rozanna)\nHeadlong(rozanna)\nDietetical(rozanna)\nIntolerant(loreen)\nUnremedied(loreen)\nTexan(loreen)\nIntolerant(margit)\nUnremedied(margit)\nHeadlong(damon)\nUnremedied(damon)\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Gradual(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) and Hueless(x) -> Dietetical(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) and Hueless(x) -> Unremedied(x))\nforall x (Headlong(x) and Texan(x) -> Hueless(x))\n\nnot Texan(rozanna)\n\nnot Texan(rozanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Carlynn is appraising. Carlynn is mounted. Carlynn is choked. Henrik is sweetened. Henrik is farthest. Henrik is motivative. Eulalie is sweetened. Eulalie is farthest. Robinet is mounted. Robinet is farthest. Cold things are appraising. All appraising things are mounted. If something is sweetened then it is mounted. Cold, cushioned things are choked. Cold, cushioned things are farthest. All mounted, motivative things are cushioned. Robinet is motivative.", "logic": "\nAppraising(carlynn)\nMounted(carlynn)\nChoked(carlynn)\nSweetened(henrik)\nFarthest(henrik)\nMotivative(henrik)\nSweetened(eulalie)\nFarthest(eulalie)\nMounted(robinet)\nFarthest(robinet)\nforall x (Sweetened(x) -> Appraising(x))\nforall x (Appraising(x) -> Mounted(x))\nforall x (Sweetened(x) -> Mounted(x))\nforall x (Sweetened(x) and Cushioned(x) -> Choked(x))\nforall x (Sweetened(x) and Cushioned(x) -> Farthest(x))\nforall x (Mounted(x) and Motivative(x) -> Cushioned(x))\n\nMotivative(robinet)\n\nMotivative(robinet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Clarine is eldritch. Clarine is avellan. Clarine is finer. Stace is panegyric. Stace is reformist. Stace is stretch. Johnette is panegyric. Johnette is reformist. Elonore is avellan. Elonore is reformist. Cold things are eldritch. All eldritch things are avellan. If something is panegyric then it is avellan. Cold, tiptop things are finer. Cold, tiptop things are reformist. All avellan, stretch things are tiptop. Elonore is not panegyric.", "logic": "\nEldritch(clarine)\nAvellan(clarine)\nFiner(clarine)\nPanegyric(stace)\nReformist(stace)\nStretch(stace)\nPanegyric(johnette)\nReformist(johnette)\nAvellan(elonore)\nReformist(elonore)\nforall x (Panegyric(x) -> Eldritch(x))\nforall x (Eldritch(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Panegyric(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Panegyric(x) and Tiptop(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Panegyric(x) and Tiptop(x) -> Reformist(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and Stretch(x) -> Tiptop(x))\n\nnot Panegyric(elonore)\n\nnot Panegyric(elonore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Englebart is loathly. Englebart is intensive. Englebart is adoptable. Olia is wingless. Olia is unrigged. Olia is manorial. Anneliese is wingless. Anneliese is unrigged. Sander is intensive. Sander is unrigged. Cold things are loathly. All loathly things are intensive. If something is wingless then it is intensive. Cold, steamed things are adoptable. Cold, steamed things are unrigged. All intensive, manorial things are steamed. Englebart is wingless.", "logic": "\nLoathly(englebart)\nIntensive(englebart)\nAdoptable(englebart)\nWingless(olia)\nUnrigged(olia)\nManorial(olia)\nWingless(anneliese)\nUnrigged(anneliese)\nIntensive(sander)\nUnrigged(sander)\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Loathly(x))\nforall x (Loathly(x) -> Intensive(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Intensive(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) and Steamed(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) and Steamed(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Intensive(x) and Manorial(x) -> Steamed(x))\n\nWingless(englebart)\n\nWingless(englebart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "The blinni is dowdy. The blinni neighbor the annalyse. The annalyse disaffect the blinni. If the blinni disaffect the annalyse then the annalyse repercuss the blinni. If something is dowdy and it neighbor the blinni then it does not see the annalyse. If something is dowdy then it neighbor the blinni. If something disaffect the blinni and it is muzzy then it neighbor the blinni. If the annalyse disaffect the blinni and the annalyse repercuss the blinni then the annalyse is sabahan. If something neighbor the annalyse then the annalyse is dowdy. If something disaffect the blinni and the blinni repercuss the annalyse then the blinni is muzzy. Kind things are dowdy. The blinni is dowdy.", "logic": "\nDowdy(blinni)\nNeighbor(blinni, annalyse)\nDisaffect(annalyse, blinni)\nDisaffect(blinni, annalyse) -> Repercuss(annalyse, blinni)\nforall x (Dowdy(x) and Neighbor(x, blinni) -> not Repercuss(x, annalyse))\nforall x (Dowdy(x) -> Neighbor(x, blinni))\nforall x (Disaffect(x, blinni) and Muzzy(x) -> Neighbor(x, blinni))\nDisaffect(annalyse, blinni) and Repercuss(annalyse, blinni) -> Sabahan(annalyse)\nforall x (Neighbor(x, annalyse) -> Dowdy(annalyse))\nforall x (Disaffect(x, blinni) and Repercuss(blinni, annalyse) -> Muzzy(blinni))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Dowdy(x))\n\nDowdy(blinni)\n\ntherefore Dowdy(blinni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The freddie is unfocussed. The freddie simonise the nita. The nita orbit the freddie. If the freddie orbit the nita then the nita leach the freddie. If something is unfocussed and it simonise the freddie then it does not see the nita. If something is unfocussed then it simonise the freddie. If something orbit the freddie and it is lowly then it simonise the freddie. If the nita orbit the freddie and the nita leach the freddie then the nita is granted. If something simonise the nita then the nita is unfocussed. If something orbit the freddie and the freddie leach the nita then the freddie is lowly. Kind things are unfocussed. The nita does not visit the freddie.", "logic": "\nUnfocussed(freddie)\nSimonise(freddie, nita)\nOrbit(nita, freddie)\nOrbit(freddie, nita) -> Leach(nita, freddie)\nforall x (Unfocussed(x) and Simonise(x, freddie) -> not Leach(x, nita))\nforall x (Unfocussed(x) -> Simonise(x, freddie))\nforall x (Orbit(x, freddie) and Lowly(x) -> Simonise(x, freddie))\nOrbit(nita, freddie) and Leach(nita, freddie) -> Granted(nita)\nforall x (Simonise(x, nita) -> Unfocussed(nita))\nforall x (Orbit(x, freddie) and Leach(freddie, nita) -> Lowly(freddie))\nforall x (Lowly(x) -> Unfocussed(x))\n\nnot Orbit(nita, freddie)\n\ntherefore Orbit(nita, freddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The gordie is undersized. The gordie swell the mervin. The mervin appall the gordie. If the gordie appall the mervin then the mervin endanger the gordie. If something is undersized and it swell the gordie then it does not see the mervin. If something is undersized then it swell the gordie. If something appall the gordie and it is hindustani then it swell the gordie. If the mervin appall the gordie and the mervin endanger the gordie then the mervin is tense. If something swell the mervin then the mervin is undersized. If something appall the gordie and the gordie endanger the mervin then the gordie is hindustani. Kind things are undersized. The gordie swell the gordie.", "logic": "\nUndersized(gordie)\nSwell(gordie, mervin)\nAppall(mervin, gordie)\nAppall(gordie, mervin) -> Endanger(mervin, gordie)\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Swell(x, gordie) -> not Endanger(x, mervin))\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Swell(x, gordie))\nforall x (Appall(x, gordie) and Hindustani(x) -> Swell(x, gordie))\nAppall(mervin, gordie) and Endanger(mervin, gordie) -> Tense(mervin)\nforall x (Swell(x, mervin) -> Undersized(mervin))\nforall x (Appall(x, gordie) and Endanger(gordie, mervin) -> Hindustani(gordie))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) -> Undersized(x))\n\nSwell(gordie, gordie)\n\nUndersized(gordie) and forall x (Undersized(x) -> Swell(x, gordie)) -> therefore Swell(gordie, gordie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The tracey is nebulose. The tracey mastermind the merill. The merill humiliate the tracey. If the tracey humiliate the merill then the merill slime the tracey. If something is nebulose and it mastermind the tracey then it does not see the merill. If something is nebulose then it mastermind the tracey. If something humiliate the tracey and it is rose then it mastermind the tracey. If the merill humiliate the tracey and the merill slime the tracey then the merill is noisy. If something mastermind the merill then the merill is nebulose. If something humiliate the tracey and the tracey slime the merill then the tracey is rose. Kind things are nebulose. The merill is not nebulose.", "logic": "\nNebulose(tracey)\nMastermind(tracey, merill)\nHumiliate(merill, tracey)\nHumiliate(tracey, merill) -> Slime(merill, tracey)\nforall x (Nebulose(x) and Mastermind(x, tracey) -> not Slime(x, merill))\nforall x (Nebulose(x) -> Mastermind(x, tracey))\nforall x (Humiliate(x, tracey) and Rose(x) -> Mastermind(x, tracey))\nHumiliate(merill, tracey) and Slime(merill, tracey) -> Noisy(merill)\nforall x (Mastermind(x, merill) -> Nebulose(merill))\nforall x (Humiliate(x, tracey) and Slime(tracey, merill) -> Rose(tracey))\nforall x (Rose(x) -> Nebulose(x))\n\nnot Nebulose(merill)\n\nMastermind(tracey, merill) and forall x (Mastermind(x, merill) -> Nebulose(merill)) -> therefore Nebulose(merill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The chicky is steamed. The chicky network the natalina. The natalina soot the chicky. If the chicky soot the natalina then the natalina anagram the chicky. If something is steamed and it network the chicky then it does not see the natalina. If something is steamed then it network the chicky. If something soot the chicky and it is affordable then it network the chicky. If the natalina soot the chicky and the natalina anagram the chicky then the natalina is resinlike. If something network the natalina then the natalina is steamed. If something soot the chicky and the chicky anagram the natalina then the chicky is affordable. Kind things are steamed. The chicky does not see the natalina.", "logic": "\nSteamed(chicky)\nNetwork(chicky, natalina)\nSoot(natalina, chicky)\nSoot(chicky, natalina) -> Anagram(natalina, chicky)\nforall x (Steamed(x) and Network(x, chicky) -> not Anagram(x, natalina))\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Network(x, chicky))\nforall x (Soot(x, chicky) and Affordable(x) -> Network(x, chicky))\nSoot(natalina, chicky) and Anagram(natalina, chicky) -> Resinlike(natalina)\nforall x (Network(x, natalina) -> Steamed(natalina))\nforall x (Soot(x, chicky) and Anagram(chicky, natalina) -> Affordable(chicky))\nforall x (Affordable(x) -> Steamed(x))\n\nnot Anagram(chicky, natalina)\n\nSteamed(chicky) and forall x (Steamed(x) -> Network(x, chicky)) -> therefore Network(chicky, chicky) Steamed(chicky) and Network(chicky, chicky) and forall x (Steamed(x) and Network(x, chicky) -> not Anagram(x, natalina)) -> therefore not Anagram(chicky, natalina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The collete is urinary. The collete trade the merrile. The merrile channelize the collete. If the collete channelize the merrile then the merrile soak the collete. If something is urinary and it trade the collete then it does not see the merrile. If something is urinary then it trade the collete. If something channelize the collete and it is objective then it trade the collete. If the merrile channelize the collete and the merrile soak the collete then the merrile is campestral. If something trade the merrile then the merrile is urinary. If something channelize the collete and the collete soak the merrile then the collete is objective. Kind things are urinary. The merrile does not like the collete.", "logic": "\nUrinary(collete)\nTrade(collete, merrile)\nChannelize(merrile, collete)\nChannelize(collete, merrile) -> Soak(merrile, collete)\nforall x (Urinary(x) and Trade(x, collete) -> not Soak(x, merrile))\nforall x (Urinary(x) -> Trade(x, collete))\nforall x (Channelize(x, collete) and Objective(x) -> Trade(x, collete))\nChannelize(merrile, collete) and Soak(merrile, collete) -> Campestral(merrile)\nforall x (Trade(x, merrile) -> Urinary(merrile))\nforall x (Channelize(x, collete) and Soak(collete, merrile) -> Objective(collete))\nforall x (Objective(x) -> Urinary(x))\n\nnot Trade(merrile, collete)\n\nTrade(collete, merrile) and forall x (Trade(x, merrile) -> Urinary(merrile)) -> therefore Urinary(merrile) Urinary(merrile) and forall x (Urinary(x) -> Trade(x, collete)) -> therefore Trade(merrile, collete)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The tova is pocked. The tova cremate the wylma. The wylma streamline the tova. If the tova streamline the wylma then the wylma fuel the tova. If something is pocked and it cremate the tova then it does not see the wylma. If something is pocked then it cremate the tova. If something streamline the tova and it is angled then it cremate the tova. If the wylma streamline the tova and the wylma fuel the tova then the wylma is exorbitant. If something cremate the wylma then the wylma is pocked. If something streamline the tova and the tova fuel the wylma then the tova is angled. Kind things are pocked. The wylma does not see the wylma.", "logic": "\nPocked(tova)\nCremate(tova, wylma)\nStreamline(wylma, tova)\nStreamline(tova, wylma) -> Fuel(wylma, tova)\nforall x (Pocked(x) and Cremate(x, tova) -> not Fuel(x, wylma))\nforall x (Pocked(x) -> Cremate(x, tova))\nforall x (Streamline(x, tova) and Angled(x) -> Cremate(x, tova))\nStreamline(wylma, tova) and Fuel(wylma, tova) -> Exorbitant(wylma)\nforall x (Cremate(x, wylma) -> Pocked(wylma))\nforall x (Streamline(x, tova) and Fuel(tova, wylma) -> Angled(tova))\nforall x (Angled(x) -> Pocked(x))\n\nnot Fuel(wylma, wylma)\n\nCremate(tova, wylma) and forall x (Cremate(x, wylma) -> Pocked(wylma)) -> therefore Pocked(wylma) Cremate(tova, wylma) and forall x (Cremate(x, wylma) -> Pocked(wylma)) -> therefore Pocked(wylma) Pocked(wylma) and forall x (Pocked(x) -> Cremate(x, tova)) -> therefore Cremate(wylma, tova) Pocked(wylma) and Cremate(wylma, tova) and forall x (Pocked(x) and Cremate(x, tova) -> not Fuel(x, wylma)) -> therefore not Fuel(wylma, wylma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The merralee is radio. The merralee smoothen the hyacintha. The hyacintha anticipate the merralee. If the merralee anticipate the hyacintha then the hyacintha spotweld the merralee. If something is radio and it smoothen the merralee then it does not see the hyacintha. If something is radio then it smoothen the merralee. If something anticipate the merralee and it is intact then it smoothen the merralee. If the hyacintha anticipate the merralee and the hyacintha spotweld the merralee then the hyacintha is lovely. If something smoothen the hyacintha then the hyacintha is radio. If something anticipate the merralee and the merralee spotweld the hyacintha then the merralee is intact. Kind things are radio. The hyacintha spotweld the hyacintha.", "logic": "\nRadio(merralee)\nSmoothen(merralee, hyacintha)\nAnticipate(hyacintha, merralee)\nAnticipate(merralee, hyacintha) -> Spotweld(hyacintha, merralee)\nforall x (Radio(x) and Smoothen(x, merralee) -> not Spotweld(x, hyacintha))\nforall x (Radio(x) -> Smoothen(x, merralee))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, merralee) and Intact(x) -> Smoothen(x, merralee))\nAnticipate(hyacintha, merralee) and Spotweld(hyacintha, merralee) -> Lovely(hyacintha)\nforall x (Smoothen(x, hyacintha) -> Radio(hyacintha))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, merralee) and Spotweld(merralee, hyacintha) -> Intact(merralee))\nforall x (Intact(x) -> Radio(x))\n\nSpotweld(hyacintha, hyacintha)\n\nSmoothen(merralee, hyacintha) and forall x (Smoothen(x, hyacintha) -> Radio(hyacintha)) -> therefore Radio(hyacintha) Smoothen(merralee, hyacintha) and forall x (Smoothen(x, hyacintha) -> Radio(hyacintha)) -> therefore Radio(hyacintha) Radio(hyacintha) and forall x (Radio(x) -> Smoothen(x, merralee)) -> therefore Smoothen(hyacintha, merralee) Radio(hyacintha) and Smoothen(hyacintha, merralee) and forall x (Radio(x) and Smoothen(x, merralee) -> not Spotweld(x, hyacintha)) -> therefore not Spotweld(hyacintha, hyacintha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The nerita is dowdy. The nerita lenify the torey. The torey mince the nerita. If the nerita mince the torey then the torey silver the nerita. If something is dowdy and it lenify the nerita then it does not see the torey. If something is dowdy then it lenify the nerita. If something mince the nerita and it is verbal then it lenify the nerita. If the torey mince the nerita and the torey silver the nerita then the torey is agitating. If something lenify the torey then the torey is dowdy. If something mince the nerita and the nerita silver the torey then the nerita is verbal. Kind things are dowdy. The torey is not agitating.", "logic": "\nDowdy(nerita)\nLenify(nerita, torey)\nMince(torey, nerita)\nMince(nerita, torey) -> Silver(torey, nerita)\nforall x (Dowdy(x) and Lenify(x, nerita) -> not Silver(x, torey))\nforall x (Dowdy(x) -> Lenify(x, nerita))\nforall x (Mince(x, nerita) and Verbal(x) -> Lenify(x, nerita))\nMince(torey, nerita) and Silver(torey, nerita) -> Agitating(torey)\nforall x (Lenify(x, torey) -> Dowdy(torey))\nforall x (Mince(x, nerita) and Silver(nerita, torey) -> Verbal(nerita))\nforall x (Verbal(x) -> Dowdy(x))\n\nnot Agitating(torey)\n\nMince(torey, nerita) and Silver(torey, nerita) -> Agitating(torey) <- Mince(nerita, torey) -> Silver(torey, nerita) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The leese is taiwanese. The leese bully the ronny. The ronny outgrow the leese. If the leese outgrow the ronny then the ronny regard the leese. If something is taiwanese and it bully the leese then it does not see the ronny. If something is taiwanese then it bully the leese. If something outgrow the leese and it is quality then it bully the leese. If the ronny outgrow the leese and the ronny regard the leese then the ronny is topologic. If something bully the ronny then the ronny is taiwanese. If something outgrow the leese and the leese regard the ronny then the leese is quality. Kind things are taiwanese. The ronny regard the leese.", "logic": "\nTaiwanese(leese)\nBully(leese, ronny)\nOutgrow(ronny, leese)\nOutgrow(leese, ronny) -> Regard(ronny, leese)\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) and Bully(x, leese) -> not Regard(x, ronny))\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) -> Bully(x, leese))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, leese) and Quality(x) -> Bully(x, leese))\nOutgrow(ronny, leese) and Regard(ronny, leese) -> Topologic(ronny)\nforall x (Bully(x, ronny) -> Taiwanese(ronny))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, leese) and Regard(leese, ronny) -> Quality(leese))\nforall x (Quality(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\n\nRegard(ronny, leese)\n\nOutgrow(leese, ronny) -> Regard(ronny, leese) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The karrah is here. The karrah experience the fremont. The fremont compact the karrah. If the karrah compact the fremont then the fremont grizzle the karrah. If something is here and it experience the karrah then it does not see the fremont. If something is here then it experience the karrah. If something compact the karrah and it is fearful then it experience the karrah. If the fremont compact the karrah and the fremont grizzle the karrah then the fremont is sour. If something experience the fremont then the fremont is here. If something compact the karrah and the karrah grizzle the fremont then the karrah is fearful. Kind things are here. The karrah is not fearful.", "logic": "\nHere(karrah)\nExperience(karrah, fremont)\nCompact(fremont, karrah)\nCompact(karrah, fremont) -> Grizzle(fremont, karrah)\nforall x (Here(x) and Experience(x, karrah) -> not Grizzle(x, fremont))\nforall x (Here(x) -> Experience(x, karrah))\nforall x (Compact(x, karrah) and Fearful(x) -> Experience(x, karrah))\nCompact(fremont, karrah) and Grizzle(fremont, karrah) -> Sour(fremont)\nforall x (Experience(x, fremont) -> Here(fremont))\nforall x (Compact(x, karrah) and Grizzle(karrah, fremont) -> Fearful(karrah))\nforall x (Fearful(x) -> Here(x))\n\nnot Fearful(karrah)\n\nforall x (Compact(x, karrah) and Grizzle(karrah, fremont) -> Fearful(karrah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The vita is unanimated. The vita embrittle the honor. The honor catabolise the vita. If the vita catabolise the honor then the honor legitimize the vita. If something is unanimated and it embrittle the vita then it does not see the honor. If something is unanimated then it embrittle the vita. If something catabolise the vita and it is palatial then it embrittle the vita. If the honor catabolise the vita and the honor legitimize the vita then the honor is blear. If something embrittle the honor then the honor is unanimated. If something catabolise the vita and the vita legitimize the honor then the vita is palatial. Kind things are unanimated. The honor catabolise the honor.", "logic": "\nUnanimated(vita)\nEmbrittle(vita, honor)\nCatabolise(honor, vita)\nCatabolise(vita, honor) -> Legitimize(honor, vita)\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and Embrittle(x, vita) -> not Legitimize(x, honor))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) -> Embrittle(x, vita))\nforall x (Catabolise(x, vita) and Palatial(x) -> Embrittle(x, vita))\nCatabolise(honor, vita) and Legitimize(honor, vita) -> Blear(honor)\nforall x (Embrittle(x, honor) -> Unanimated(honor))\nforall x (Catabolise(x, vita) and Legitimize(vita, honor) -> Palatial(vita))\nforall x (Palatial(x) -> Unanimated(x))\n\nCatabolise(honor, honor)\n\nCatabolise(honor, honor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The rachelle is vinaceous. The rachelle punish the sarah. The sarah whomp the rachelle. If the rachelle whomp the sarah then the sarah compress the rachelle. If something is vinaceous and it punish the rachelle then it does not see the sarah. If something is vinaceous then it punish the rachelle. If something whomp the rachelle and it is sciolistic then it punish the rachelle. If the sarah whomp the rachelle and the sarah compress the rachelle then the sarah is greatest. If something punish the sarah then the sarah is vinaceous. If something whomp the rachelle and the rachelle compress the sarah then the rachelle is sciolistic. Kind things are vinaceous. The rachelle does not visit the sarah.", "logic": "\nVinaceous(rachelle)\nPunish(rachelle, sarah)\nWhomp(sarah, rachelle)\nWhomp(rachelle, sarah) -> Compress(sarah, rachelle)\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) and Punish(x, rachelle) -> not Compress(x, sarah))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Punish(x, rachelle))\nforall x (Whomp(x, rachelle) and Sciolistic(x) -> Punish(x, rachelle))\nWhomp(sarah, rachelle) and Compress(sarah, rachelle) -> Greatest(sarah)\nforall x (Punish(x, sarah) -> Vinaceous(sarah))\nforall x (Whomp(x, rachelle) and Compress(rachelle, sarah) -> Sciolistic(rachelle))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\n\nnot Whomp(rachelle, sarah)\n\nnot Whomp(rachelle, sarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The lazar is lengthened. The lazar snowmobile the prunella. The prunella reenforce the lazar. If the lazar reenforce the prunella then the prunella surfeit the lazar. If something is lengthened and it snowmobile the lazar then it does not see the prunella. If something is lengthened then it snowmobile the lazar. If something reenforce the lazar and it is lacrimal then it snowmobile the lazar. If the prunella reenforce the lazar and the prunella surfeit the lazar then the prunella is rural. If something snowmobile the prunella then the prunella is lengthened. If something reenforce the lazar and the lazar surfeit the prunella then the lazar is lacrimal. Kind things are lengthened. The lazar is rural.", "logic": "\nLengthened(lazar)\nSnowmobile(lazar, prunella)\nReenforce(prunella, lazar)\nReenforce(lazar, prunella) -> Surfeit(prunella, lazar)\nforall x (Lengthened(x) and Snowmobile(x, lazar) -> not Surfeit(x, prunella))\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Snowmobile(x, lazar))\nforall x (Reenforce(x, lazar) and Lacrimal(x) -> Snowmobile(x, lazar))\nReenforce(prunella, lazar) and Surfeit(prunella, lazar) -> Rural(prunella)\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, prunella) -> Lengthened(prunella))\nforall x (Reenforce(x, lazar) and Surfeit(lazar, prunella) -> Lacrimal(lazar))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Lengthened(x))\n\nRural(lazar)\n\nRural(lazar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The madonna is galilean. The madonna snack the cornie. The cornie percuss the madonna. If the madonna percuss the cornie then the cornie absolve the madonna. If something is galilean and it snack the madonna then it does not see the cornie. If something is galilean then it snack the madonna. If something percuss the madonna and it is gingery then it snack the madonna. If the cornie percuss the madonna and the cornie absolve the madonna then the cornie is sheared. If something snack the cornie then the cornie is galilean. If something percuss the madonna and the madonna absolve the cornie then the madonna is gingery. Kind things are galilean. The cornie is not red.", "logic": "\nGalilean(madonna)\nSnack(madonna, cornie)\nPercuss(cornie, madonna)\nPercuss(madonna, cornie) -> Absolve(cornie, madonna)\nforall x (Galilean(x) and Snack(x, madonna) -> not Absolve(x, cornie))\nforall x (Galilean(x) -> Snack(x, madonna))\nforall x (Percuss(x, madonna) and Gingery(x) -> Snack(x, madonna))\nPercuss(cornie, madonna) and Absolve(cornie, madonna) -> Sheared(cornie)\nforall x (Snack(x, cornie) -> Galilean(cornie))\nforall x (Percuss(x, madonna) and Absolve(madonna, cornie) -> Gingery(madonna))\nforall x (Gingery(x) -> Galilean(x))\n\nnot Red(cornie)\n\nnot Red(cornie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The vivianna is tops. The vivianna moonshine the rose. The rose beseem the vivianna. If the vivianna beseem the rose then the rose negociate the vivianna. If something is tops and it moonshine the vivianna then it does not see the rose. If something is tops then it moonshine the vivianna. If something beseem the vivianna and it is dour then it moonshine the vivianna. If the rose beseem the vivianna and the rose negociate the vivianna then the rose is fervent. If something moonshine the rose then the rose is tops. If something beseem the vivianna and the vivianna negociate the rose then the vivianna is dour. Kind things are tops. The rose moonshine the rose.", "logic": "\nTops(vivianna)\nMoonshine(vivianna, rose)\nBeseem(rose, vivianna)\nBeseem(vivianna, rose) -> Negociate(rose, vivianna)\nforall x (Tops(x) and Moonshine(x, vivianna) -> not Negociate(x, rose))\nforall x (Tops(x) -> Moonshine(x, vivianna))\nforall x (Beseem(x, vivianna) and Dour(x) -> Moonshine(x, vivianna))\nBeseem(rose, vivianna) and Negociate(rose, vivianna) -> Fervent(rose)\nforall x (Moonshine(x, rose) -> Tops(rose))\nforall x (Beseem(x, vivianna) and Negociate(vivianna, rose) -> Dour(vivianna))\nforall x (Dour(x) -> Tops(x))\n\nMoonshine(rose, rose)\n\nMoonshine(rose, rose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The gino is thickening. The gino pyramid the paolo. The paolo espouse the gino. If the gino is unlogical and the gino pyramid the paolo then the paolo is tenor. If someone espouse the gino then they are not bawdy. If someone is thickening then they are unlogical. If the paolo sodomize the gino and the gino is tenor then the gino is unlogical. If someone sodomize the gino then the gino sodomize the paolo. If the paolo is tenor then the paolo pyramid the gino. The gino is thickening.", "logic": "\nThickening(gino)\nPyramid(gino, paolo)\nEspouse(paolo, gino)\nUnlogical(gino) and Pyramid(gino, paolo) -> Tenor(paolo)\nforall x (Espouse(x, gino) -> not Bawdy(x))\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nSodomize(paolo, gino) and Tenor(gino) -> Unlogical(gino)\nforall x (Sodomize(x, gino) -> Sodomize(gino, paolo))\nTenor(paolo) -> Pyramid(paolo, gino)\n\nThickening(gino)\n\ntherefore Thickening(gino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The stanly is seventy. The stanly backpedal the eba. The eba resubmit the stanly. If the stanly is organismal and the stanly backpedal the eba then the eba is entozoan. If someone resubmit the stanly then they are not lordless. If someone is seventy then they are organismal. If the eba isomerise the stanly and the stanly is entozoan then the stanly is organismal. If someone isomerise the stanly then the stanly isomerise the eba. If the eba is entozoan then the eba backpedal the stanly. The stanly does not like the eba.", "logic": "\nSeventy(stanly)\nBackpedal(stanly, eba)\nResubmit(eba, stanly)\nOrganismal(stanly) and Backpedal(stanly, eba) -> Entozoan(eba)\nforall x (Resubmit(x, stanly) -> not Lordless(x))\nforall x (Seventy(x) -> Organismal(x))\nIsomerise(eba, stanly) and Entozoan(stanly) -> Organismal(stanly)\nforall x (Isomerise(x, stanly) -> Isomerise(stanly, eba))\nEntozoan(eba) -> Backpedal(eba, stanly)\n\nnot Backpedal(stanly, eba)\n\ntherefore Backpedal(stanly, eba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The elissa is petrifying. The elissa underlie the zalman. The zalman chat the elissa. If the elissa is curvy and the elissa underlie the zalman then the zalman is synergetic. If someone chat the elissa then they are not rackety. If someone is petrifying then they are curvy. If the zalman disagree the elissa and the elissa is synergetic then the elissa is curvy. If someone disagree the elissa then the elissa disagree the zalman. If the zalman is synergetic then the zalman underlie the elissa. The elissa is curvy.", "logic": "\nPetrifying(elissa)\nUnderlie(elissa, zalman)\nChat(zalman, elissa)\nCurvy(elissa) and Underlie(elissa, zalman) -> Synergetic(zalman)\nforall x (Chat(x, elissa) -> not Rackety(x))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) -> Curvy(x))\nDisagree(zalman, elissa) and Synergetic(elissa) -> Curvy(elissa)\nforall x (Disagree(x, elissa) -> Disagree(elissa, zalman))\nSynergetic(zalman) -> Underlie(zalman, elissa)\n\nCurvy(elissa)\n\nPetrifying(elissa) and forall x (Petrifying(x) -> Curvy(x)) -> therefore Curvy(elissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The conrad is patchy. The conrad didder the rosemary. The rosemary brutalize the conrad. If the conrad is unenforced and the conrad didder the rosemary then the rosemary is spoilt. If someone brutalize the conrad then they are not pleasing. If someone is patchy then they are unenforced. If the rosemary enthrone the conrad and the conrad is spoilt then the conrad is unenforced. If someone enthrone the conrad then the conrad enthrone the rosemary. If the rosemary is spoilt then the rosemary didder the conrad. The conrad is not unenforced.", "logic": "\nPatchy(conrad)\nDidder(conrad, rosemary)\nBrutalize(rosemary, conrad)\nUnenforced(conrad) and Didder(conrad, rosemary) -> Spoilt(rosemary)\nforall x (Brutalize(x, conrad) -> not Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Patchy(x) -> Unenforced(x))\nEnthrone(rosemary, conrad) and Spoilt(conrad) -> Unenforced(conrad)\nforall x (Enthrone(x, conrad) -> Enthrone(conrad, rosemary))\nSpoilt(rosemary) -> Didder(rosemary, conrad)\n\nnot Unenforced(conrad)\n\nPatchy(conrad) and forall x (Patchy(x) -> Unenforced(x)) -> therefore Unenforced(conrad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The abbe is fifth. The abbe promenade the fiann. The fiann reload the abbe. If the abbe is purblind and the abbe promenade the fiann then the fiann is sedgelike. If someone reload the abbe then they are not suspect. If someone is fifth then they are purblind. If the fiann untie the abbe and the abbe is sedgelike then the abbe is purblind. If someone untie the abbe then the abbe untie the fiann. If the fiann is sedgelike then the fiann promenade the abbe. The fiann is sedgelike.", "logic": "\nFifth(abbe)\nPromenade(abbe, fiann)\nReload(fiann, abbe)\nPurblind(abbe) and Promenade(abbe, fiann) -> Sedgelike(fiann)\nforall x (Reload(x, abbe) -> not Suspect(x))\nforall x (Fifth(x) -> Purblind(x))\nUntie(fiann, abbe) and Sedgelike(abbe) -> Purblind(abbe)\nforall x (Untie(x, abbe) -> Untie(abbe, fiann))\nSedgelike(fiann) -> Promenade(fiann, abbe)\n\nSedgelike(fiann)\n\nFifth(abbe) and forall x (Fifth(x) -> Purblind(x)) -> therefore Purblind(abbe) Purblind(abbe) and Promenade(abbe, fiann) and Purblind(abbe) and Promenade(abbe, fiann) -> Sedgelike(fiann) -> therefore Sedgelike(fiann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The brigitte is wooly. The brigitte disable the erinn. The erinn recast the brigitte. If the brigitte is diestrual and the brigitte disable the erinn then the erinn is computable. If someone recast the brigitte then they are not reported. If someone is wooly then they are diestrual. If the erinn cinematize the brigitte and the brigitte is computable then the brigitte is diestrual. If someone cinematize the brigitte then the brigitte cinematize the erinn. If the erinn is computable then the erinn disable the brigitte. The erinn is not computable.", "logic": "\nWooly(brigitte)\nDisable(brigitte, erinn)\nRecast(erinn, brigitte)\nDiestrual(brigitte) and Disable(brigitte, erinn) -> Computable(erinn)\nforall x (Recast(x, brigitte) -> not Reported(x))\nforall x (Wooly(x) -> Diestrual(x))\nCinematize(erinn, brigitte) and Computable(brigitte) -> Diestrual(brigitte)\nforall x (Cinematize(x, brigitte) -> Cinematize(brigitte, erinn))\nComputable(erinn) -> Disable(erinn, brigitte)\n\nnot Computable(erinn)\n\nWooly(brigitte) and forall x (Wooly(x) -> Diestrual(x)) -> therefore Diestrual(brigitte) Diestrual(brigitte) and Disable(brigitte, erinn) and Diestrual(brigitte) and Disable(brigitte, erinn) -> Computable(erinn) -> therefore Computable(erinn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The joy is immoral. The joy evidence the kathryn. The kathryn fall the joy. If the joy is ophthalmic and the joy evidence the kathryn then the kathryn is tranquil. If someone fall the joy then they are not makeshift. If someone is immoral then they are ophthalmic. If the kathryn scissor the joy and the joy is tranquil then the joy is ophthalmic. If someone scissor the joy then the joy scissor the kathryn. If the kathryn is tranquil then the kathryn evidence the joy. The kathryn evidence the joy.", "logic": "\nImmoral(joy)\nEvidence(joy, kathryn)\nFall(kathryn, joy)\nOphthalmic(joy) and Evidence(joy, kathryn) -> Tranquil(kathryn)\nforall x (Fall(x, joy) -> not Makeshift(x))\nforall x (Immoral(x) -> Ophthalmic(x))\nScissor(kathryn, joy) and Tranquil(joy) -> Ophthalmic(joy)\nforall x (Scissor(x, joy) -> Scissor(joy, kathryn))\nTranquil(kathryn) -> Evidence(kathryn, joy)\n\nEvidence(kathryn, joy)\n\nImmoral(joy) and forall x (Immoral(x) -> Ophthalmic(x)) -> therefore Ophthalmic(joy) Ophthalmic(joy) and Evidence(joy, kathryn) and Ophthalmic(joy) and Evidence(joy, kathryn) -> Tranquil(kathryn) -> therefore Tranquil(kathryn) Tranquil(kathryn) and Tranquil(kathryn) -> Evidence(kathryn, joy) -> therefore Evidence(kathryn, joy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The sherwin is hydrous. The sherwin hunch the joelly. The joelly confuse the sherwin. If the sherwin is posterior and the sherwin hunch the joelly then the joelly is parental. If someone confuse the sherwin then they are not dacitic. If someone is hydrous then they are posterior. If the joelly chalk the sherwin and the sherwin is parental then the sherwin is posterior. If someone chalk the sherwin then the sherwin chalk the joelly. If the joelly is parental then the joelly hunch the sherwin. The joelly does not like the sherwin.", "logic": "\nHydrous(sherwin)\nHunch(sherwin, joelly)\nConfuse(joelly, sherwin)\nPosterior(sherwin) and Hunch(sherwin, joelly) -> Parental(joelly)\nforall x (Confuse(x, sherwin) -> not Dacitic(x))\nforall x (Hydrous(x) -> Posterior(x))\nChalk(joelly, sherwin) and Parental(sherwin) -> Posterior(sherwin)\nforall x (Chalk(x, sherwin) -> Chalk(sherwin, joelly))\nParental(joelly) -> Hunch(joelly, sherwin)\n\nnot Hunch(joelly, sherwin)\n\nHydrous(sherwin) and forall x (Hydrous(x) -> Posterior(x)) -> therefore Posterior(sherwin) Posterior(sherwin) and Hunch(sherwin, joelly) and Posterior(sherwin) and Hunch(sherwin, joelly) -> Parental(joelly) -> therefore Parental(joelly) Parental(joelly) and Parental(joelly) -> Hunch(joelly, sherwin) -> therefore Hunch(joelly, sherwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The nicholle is toughened. The nicholle barbeque the corinne. The corinne revile the nicholle. If the nicholle is slushy and the nicholle barbeque the corinne then the corinne is fuscous. If someone revile the nicholle then they are not rearmost. If someone is toughened then they are slushy. If the corinne emote the nicholle and the nicholle is fuscous then the nicholle is slushy. If someone emote the nicholle then the nicholle emote the corinne. If the corinne is fuscous then the corinne barbeque the nicholle. The nicholle does not need the corinne.", "logic": "\nToughened(nicholle)\nBarbeque(nicholle, corinne)\nRevile(corinne, nicholle)\nSlushy(nicholle) and Barbeque(nicholle, corinne) -> Fuscous(corinne)\nforall x (Revile(x, nicholle) -> not Rearmost(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Slushy(x))\nEmote(corinne, nicholle) and Fuscous(nicholle) -> Slushy(nicholle)\nforall x (Emote(x, nicholle) -> Emote(nicholle, corinne))\nFuscous(corinne) -> Barbeque(corinne, nicholle)\n\nnot Emote(nicholle, corinne)\n\nforall x (Emote(x, nicholle) -> Emote(nicholle, corinne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The westley is expiratory. The westley fishtail the colline. The colline improvise the westley. If the westley is myotonic and the westley fishtail the colline then the colline is veteran. If someone improvise the westley then they are not brushlike. If someone is expiratory then they are myotonic. If the colline confound the westley and the westley is veteran then the westley is myotonic. If someone confound the westley then the westley confound the colline. If the colline is veteran then the colline fishtail the westley. The colline is myotonic.", "logic": "\nExpiratory(westley)\nFishtail(westley, colline)\nImprovise(colline, westley)\nMyotonic(westley) and Fishtail(westley, colline) -> Veteran(colline)\nforall x (Improvise(x, westley) -> not Brushlike(x))\nforall x (Expiratory(x) -> Myotonic(x))\nConfound(colline, westley) and Veteran(westley) -> Myotonic(westley)\nforall x (Confound(x, westley) -> Confound(westley, colline))\nVeteran(colline) -> Fishtail(colline, westley)\n\nMyotonic(colline)\n\nforall x (Expiratory(x) -> Myotonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The eugine is colonnaded. The eugine dulcorate the karol. The karol carnalize the eugine. If the eugine is snarly and the eugine dulcorate the karol then the karol is pugilistic. If someone carnalize the eugine then they are not myotic. If someone is colonnaded then they are snarly. If the karol recess the eugine and the eugine is pugilistic then the eugine is snarly. If someone recess the eugine then the eugine recess the karol. If the karol is pugilistic then the karol dulcorate the eugine. The karol is not cold.", "logic": "\nColonnaded(eugine)\nDulcorate(eugine, karol)\nCarnalize(karol, eugine)\nSnarly(eugine) and Dulcorate(eugine, karol) -> Pugilistic(karol)\nforall x (Carnalize(x, eugine) -> not Myotic(x))\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) -> Snarly(x))\nRecess(karol, eugine) and Pugilistic(eugine) -> Snarly(eugine)\nforall x (Recess(x, eugine) -> Recess(eugine, karol))\nPugilistic(karol) -> Dulcorate(karol, eugine)\n\nnot Cold(karol)\n\nnot Cold(karol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The kam is triple. The kam indurate the ginger. The ginger swear the kam. If the kam is ebionite and the kam indurate the ginger then the ginger is unthawed. If someone swear the kam then they are not dastardly. If someone is triple then they are ebionite. If the ginger compliment the kam and the kam is unthawed then the kam is ebionite. If someone compliment the kam then the kam compliment the ginger. If the ginger is unthawed then the ginger indurate the kam. The ginger swear the ginger.", "logic": "\nTriple(kam)\nIndurate(kam, ginger)\nSwear(ginger, kam)\nEbionite(kam) and Indurate(kam, ginger) -> Unthawed(ginger)\nforall x (Swear(x, kam) -> not Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Triple(x) -> Ebionite(x))\nCompliment(ginger, kam) and Unthawed(kam) -> Ebionite(kam)\nforall x (Compliment(x, kam) -> Compliment(kam, ginger))\nUnthawed(ginger) -> Indurate(ginger, kam)\n\nSwear(ginger, ginger)\n\nSwear(ginger, ginger) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The aggie is parturient. The aggie plagiarize the rivkah. The rivkah spume the aggie. If the aggie is liplike and the aggie plagiarize the rivkah then the rivkah is assamese. If someone spume the aggie then they are not glamorous. If someone is parturient then they are liplike. If the rivkah enamor the aggie and the aggie is assamese then the aggie is liplike. If someone enamor the aggie then the aggie enamor the rivkah. If the rivkah is assamese then the rivkah plagiarize the aggie. The aggie is not cold.", "logic": "\nParturient(aggie)\nPlagiarize(aggie, rivkah)\nSpume(rivkah, aggie)\nLiplike(aggie) and Plagiarize(aggie, rivkah) -> Assamese(rivkah)\nforall x (Spume(x, aggie) -> not Glamorous(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Liplike(x))\nEnamor(rivkah, aggie) and Assamese(aggie) -> Liplike(aggie)\nforall x (Enamor(x, aggie) -> Enamor(aggie, rivkah))\nAssamese(rivkah) -> Plagiarize(rivkah, aggie)\n\nnot Cold(aggie)\n\nnot Cold(aggie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The chancey is caulked. The chancey sandpaper the adelind. The adelind invert the chancey. If the chancey is handelian and the chancey sandpaper the adelind then the adelind is pellucid. If someone invert the chancey then they are not rampageous. If someone is caulked then they are handelian. If the adelind belabor the chancey and the chancey is pellucid then the chancey is handelian. If someone belabor the chancey then the chancey belabor the adelind. If the adelind is pellucid then the adelind sandpaper the chancey. The chancey invert the adelind.", "logic": "\nCaulked(chancey)\nSandpaper(chancey, adelind)\nInvert(adelind, chancey)\nHandelian(chancey) and Sandpaper(chancey, adelind) -> Pellucid(adelind)\nforall x (Invert(x, chancey) -> not Rampageous(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) -> Handelian(x))\nBelabor(adelind, chancey) and Pellucid(chancey) -> Handelian(chancey)\nforall x (Belabor(x, chancey) -> Belabor(chancey, adelind))\nPellucid(adelind) -> Sandpaper(adelind, chancey)\n\nInvert(chancey, adelind)\n\nInvert(chancey, adelind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The erina is naiant. The erina mind the rosie. The rosie finalise the erina. If the erina is ariled and the erina mind the rosie then the rosie is unitarian. If someone finalise the erina then they are not epizoan. If someone is naiant then they are ariled. If the rosie experiment the erina and the erina is unitarian then the erina is ariled. If someone experiment the erina then the erina experiment the rosie. If the rosie is unitarian then the rosie mind the erina. The rosie is not naiant.", "logic": "\nNaiant(erina)\nMind(erina, rosie)\nFinalise(rosie, erina)\nAriled(erina) and Mind(erina, rosie) -> Unitarian(rosie)\nforall x (Finalise(x, erina) -> not Epizoan(x))\nforall x (Naiant(x) -> Ariled(x))\nExperiment(rosie, erina) and Unitarian(erina) -> Ariled(erina)\nforall x (Experiment(x, erina) -> Experiment(erina, rosie))\nUnitarian(rosie) -> Mind(rosie, erina)\n\nnot Naiant(rosie)\n\nnot Naiant(rosie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The karsten is aflare. The karsten deafen the erena. The erena detonate the karsten. If the karsten is eventful and the karsten deafen the erena then the erena is exhausting. If someone detonate the karsten then they are not murine. If someone is aflare then they are eventful. If the erena arborize the karsten and the karsten is exhausting then the karsten is eventful. If someone arborize the karsten then the karsten arborize the erena. If the erena is exhausting then the erena deafen the karsten. The erena arborize the karsten.", "logic": "\nAflare(karsten)\nDeafen(karsten, erena)\nDetonate(erena, karsten)\nEventful(karsten) and Deafen(karsten, erena) -> Exhausting(erena)\nforall x (Detonate(x, karsten) -> not Murine(x))\nforall x (Aflare(x) -> Eventful(x))\nArborize(erena, karsten) and Exhausting(karsten) -> Eventful(karsten)\nforall x (Arborize(x, karsten) -> Arborize(karsten, erena))\nExhausting(erena) -> Deafen(erena, karsten)\n\nArborize(erena, karsten)\n\nArborize(erena, karsten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The nataline append the marybelle. The nataline append the kali. The nataline customize the marybelle. The nataline is turgid. The nataline is rimless. The marybelle append the nataline. The marybelle append the kali. The marybelle customize the nataline. The marybelle customize the kali. The marybelle is rimless. The marybelle gradate the kali. The kali append the marybelle. The kali does not eat the marybelle. The kali is rimless. The kali is footless. If someone append the marybelle then they are fogged. If someone is rimless and they like the kali then they eat the marybelle. If someone append the kali then the kali customize the nataline. If someone append the nataline and the nataline append the marybelle then the nataline append the kali. If someone gradate the kali and they are not turgid then they like the nataline. If someone is fogged and they eat the marybelle then they eat the kali. If someone gradate the marybelle then the marybelle does not eat the kali. If the nataline append the marybelle and the nataline customize the kali then the marybelle gradate the nataline. The marybelle append the kali.", "logic": "\nAppend(nataline, marybelle)\nAppend(nataline, kali)\nCustomize(nataline, marybelle)\nTurgid(nataline)\nRimless(nataline)\nAppend(marybelle, nataline)\nAppend(marybelle, kali)\nCustomize(marybelle, nataline)\nCustomize(marybelle, kali)\nRimless(marybelle)\nGradate(marybelle, kali)\nAppend(kali, marybelle)\nnot Customize(kali, marybelle)\nRimless(kali)\nFootless(kali)\nforall x (Append(x, marybelle) -> Fogged(x))\nforall x (Rimless(x) and Gradate(x, kali) -> Customize(x, marybelle))\nforall x (Append(x, kali) -> Customize(kali, nataline))\nforall x (Append(x, nataline) and Append(nataline, marybelle) -> Append(nataline, kali))\nforall x (Gradate(x, kali) and not Turgid(x) -> Gradate(x, nataline))\nforall x (Fogged(x) and Customize(x, marybelle) -> Customize(x, kali))\nforall x (Gradate(x, marybelle) -> not Customize(marybelle, kali))\nAppend(nataline, marybelle) and Customize(nataline, kali) -> Gradate(marybelle, nataline)\n\nAppend(marybelle, kali)\n\ntherefore Append(marybelle, kali)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The ester swab the pier. The ester swab the corie. The ester churr the pier. The ester is aerobic. The ester is overhand. The pier swab the ester. The pier swab the corie. The pier churr the ester. The pier churr the corie. The pier is overhand. The pier exceed the corie. The corie swab the pier. The corie does not eat the pier. The corie is overhand. The corie is huddled. If someone swab the pier then they are novel. If someone is overhand and they like the corie then they eat the pier. If someone swab the corie then the corie churr the ester. If someone swab the ester and the ester swab the pier then the ester swab the corie. If someone exceed the corie and they are not aerobic then they like the ester. If someone is novel and they eat the pier then they eat the corie. If someone exceed the pier then the pier does not eat the corie. If the ester swab the pier and the ester churr the corie then the pier exceed the ester. The pier does not chase the ester.", "logic": "\nSwab(ester, pier)\nSwab(ester, corie)\nChurr(ester, pier)\nAerobic(ester)\nOverhand(ester)\nSwab(pier, ester)\nSwab(pier, corie)\nChurr(pier, ester)\nChurr(pier, corie)\nOverhand(pier)\nExceed(pier, corie)\nSwab(corie, pier)\nnot Churr(corie, pier)\nOverhand(corie)\nHuddled(corie)\nforall x (Swab(x, pier) -> Novel(x))\nforall x (Overhand(x) and Exceed(x, corie) -> Churr(x, pier))\nforall x (Swab(x, corie) -> Churr(corie, ester))\nforall x (Swab(x, ester) and Swab(ester, pier) -> Swab(ester, corie))\nforall x (Exceed(x, corie) and not Aerobic(x) -> Exceed(x, ester))\nforall x (Novel(x) and Churr(x, pier) -> Churr(x, corie))\nforall x (Exceed(x, pier) -> not Churr(pier, corie))\nSwab(ester, pier) and Churr(ester, corie) -> Exceed(pier, ester)\n\nnot Swab(pier, ester)\n\ntherefore Swab(pier, ester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The saree taboo the clo. The saree taboo the luther. The saree reorganise the clo. The saree is burdened. The saree is expansive. The clo taboo the saree. The clo taboo the luther. The clo reorganise the saree. The clo reorganise the luther. The clo is expansive. The clo carpenter the luther. The luther taboo the clo. The luther does not eat the clo. The luther is expansive. The luther is citric. If someone taboo the clo then they are wolfish. If someone is expansive and they like the luther then they eat the clo. If someone taboo the luther then the luther reorganise the saree. If someone taboo the saree and the saree taboo the clo then the saree taboo the luther. If someone carpenter the luther and they are not burdened then they like the saree. If someone is wolfish and they eat the clo then they eat the luther. If someone carpenter the clo then the clo does not eat the luther. If the saree taboo the clo and the saree reorganise the luther then the clo carpenter the saree. The luther is wolfish.", "logic": "\nTaboo(saree, clo)\nTaboo(saree, luther)\nReorganise(saree, clo)\nBurdened(saree)\nExpansive(saree)\nTaboo(clo, saree)\nTaboo(clo, luther)\nReorganise(clo, saree)\nReorganise(clo, luther)\nExpansive(clo)\nCarpenter(clo, luther)\nTaboo(luther, clo)\nnot Reorganise(luther, clo)\nExpansive(luther)\nCitric(luther)\nforall x (Taboo(x, clo) -> Wolfish(x))\nforall x (Expansive(x) and Carpenter(x, luther) -> Reorganise(x, clo))\nforall x (Taboo(x, luther) -> Reorganise(luther, saree))\nforall x (Taboo(x, saree) and Taboo(saree, clo) -> Taboo(saree, luther))\nforall x (Carpenter(x, luther) and not Burdened(x) -> Carpenter(x, saree))\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and Reorganise(x, clo) -> Reorganise(x, luther))\nforall x (Carpenter(x, clo) -> not Reorganise(clo, luther))\nTaboo(saree, clo) and Reorganise(saree, luther) -> Carpenter(clo, saree)\n\nWolfish(luther)\n\nTaboo(luther, clo) and forall x (Taboo(x, clo) -> Wolfish(x)) -> therefore Wolfish(luther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The eydie curl the axel. The eydie curl the bobbie. The eydie distrust the axel. The eydie is squeaky. The eydie is overmodest. The axel curl the eydie. The axel curl the bobbie. The axel distrust the eydie. The axel distrust the bobbie. The axel is overmodest. The axel laud the bobbie. The bobbie curl the axel. The bobbie does not eat the axel. The bobbie is overmodest. The bobbie is upraised. If someone curl the axel then they are awash. If someone is overmodest and they like the bobbie then they eat the axel. If someone curl the bobbie then the bobbie distrust the eydie. If someone curl the eydie and the eydie curl the axel then the eydie curl the bobbie. If someone laud the bobbie and they are not squeaky then they like the eydie. If someone is awash and they eat the axel then they eat the bobbie. If someone laud the axel then the axel does not eat the bobbie. If the eydie curl the axel and the eydie distrust the bobbie then the axel laud the eydie. The bobbie is not awash.", "logic": "\nCurl(eydie, axel)\nCurl(eydie, bobbie)\nDistrust(eydie, axel)\nSqueaky(eydie)\nOvermodest(eydie)\nCurl(axel, eydie)\nCurl(axel, bobbie)\nDistrust(axel, eydie)\nDistrust(axel, bobbie)\nOvermodest(axel)\nLaud(axel, bobbie)\nCurl(bobbie, axel)\nnot Distrust(bobbie, axel)\nOvermodest(bobbie)\nUpraised(bobbie)\nforall x (Curl(x, axel) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Overmodest(x) and Laud(x, bobbie) -> Distrust(x, axel))\nforall x (Curl(x, bobbie) -> Distrust(bobbie, eydie))\nforall x (Curl(x, eydie) and Curl(eydie, axel) -> Curl(eydie, bobbie))\nforall x (Laud(x, bobbie) and not Squeaky(x) -> Laud(x, eydie))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Distrust(x, axel) -> Distrust(x, bobbie))\nforall x (Laud(x, axel) -> not Distrust(axel, bobbie))\nCurl(eydie, axel) and Distrust(eydie, bobbie) -> Laud(axel, eydie)\n\nnot Awash(bobbie)\n\nCurl(bobbie, axel) and forall x (Curl(x, axel) -> Awash(x)) -> therefore Awash(bobbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The lana jockey the barby. The lana jockey the zandra. The lana disco the barby. The lana is drained. The lana is apelike. The barby jockey the lana. The barby jockey the zandra. The barby disco the lana. The barby disco the zandra. The barby is apelike. The barby abscise the zandra. The zandra jockey the barby. The zandra does not eat the barby. The zandra is apelike. The zandra is sloughy. If someone jockey the barby then they are bypast. If someone is apelike and they like the zandra then they eat the barby. If someone jockey the zandra then the zandra disco the lana. If someone jockey the lana and the lana jockey the barby then the lana jockey the zandra. If someone abscise the zandra and they are not drained then they like the lana. If someone is bypast and they eat the barby then they eat the zandra. If someone abscise the barby then the barby does not eat the zandra. If the lana jockey the barby and the lana disco the zandra then the barby abscise the lana. The lana disco the zandra.", "logic": "\nJockey(lana, barby)\nJockey(lana, zandra)\nDisco(lana, barby)\nDrained(lana)\nApelike(lana)\nJockey(barby, lana)\nJockey(barby, zandra)\nDisco(barby, lana)\nDisco(barby, zandra)\nApelike(barby)\nAbscise(barby, zandra)\nJockey(zandra, barby)\nnot Disco(zandra, barby)\nApelike(zandra)\nSloughy(zandra)\nforall x (Jockey(x, barby) -> Bypast(x))\nforall x (Apelike(x) and Abscise(x, zandra) -> Disco(x, barby))\nforall x (Jockey(x, zandra) -> Disco(zandra, lana))\nforall x (Jockey(x, lana) and Jockey(lana, barby) -> Jockey(lana, zandra))\nforall x (Abscise(x, zandra) and not Drained(x) -> Abscise(x, lana))\nforall x (Bypast(x) and Disco(x, barby) -> Disco(x, zandra))\nforall x (Abscise(x, barby) -> not Disco(barby, zandra))\nJockey(lana, barby) and Disco(lana, zandra) -> Abscise(barby, lana)\n\nDisco(lana, zandra)\n\nJockey(lana, barby) and forall x (Jockey(x, barby) -> Bypast(x)) -> therefore Bypast(lana) Bypast(lana) and Disco(lana, barby) and forall x (Bypast(x) and Disco(x, barby) -> Disco(x, zandra)) -> therefore Disco(lana, zandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The thad figure the mikhail. The thad figure the elihu. The thad dodge the mikhail. The thad is blame. The thad is senescent. The mikhail figure the thad. The mikhail figure the elihu. The mikhail dodge the thad. The mikhail dodge the elihu. The mikhail is senescent. The mikhail stab the elihu. The elihu figure the mikhail. The elihu does not eat the mikhail. The elihu is senescent. The elihu is magnified. If someone figure the mikhail then they are inhumane. If someone is senescent and they like the elihu then they eat the mikhail. If someone figure the elihu then the elihu dodge the thad. If someone figure the thad and the thad figure the mikhail then the thad figure the elihu. If someone stab the elihu and they are not blame then they like the thad. If someone is inhumane and they eat the mikhail then they eat the elihu. If someone stab the mikhail then the mikhail does not eat the elihu. If the thad figure the mikhail and the thad dodge the elihu then the mikhail stab the thad. The thad does not eat the elihu.", "logic": "\nFigure(thad, mikhail)\nFigure(thad, elihu)\nDodge(thad, mikhail)\nBlame(thad)\nSenescent(thad)\nFigure(mikhail, thad)\nFigure(mikhail, elihu)\nDodge(mikhail, thad)\nDodge(mikhail, elihu)\nSenescent(mikhail)\nStab(mikhail, elihu)\nFigure(elihu, mikhail)\nnot Dodge(elihu, mikhail)\nSenescent(elihu)\nMagnified(elihu)\nforall x (Figure(x, mikhail) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Stab(x, elihu) -> Dodge(x, mikhail))\nforall x (Figure(x, elihu) -> Dodge(elihu, thad))\nforall x (Figure(x, thad) and Figure(thad, mikhail) -> Figure(thad, elihu))\nforall x (Stab(x, elihu) and not Blame(x) -> Stab(x, thad))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Dodge(x, mikhail) -> Dodge(x, elihu))\nforall x (Stab(x, mikhail) -> not Dodge(mikhail, elihu))\nFigure(thad, mikhail) and Dodge(thad, elihu) -> Stab(mikhail, thad)\n\nnot Dodge(thad, elihu)\n\nFigure(thad, mikhail) and forall x (Figure(x, mikhail) -> Inhumane(x)) -> therefore Inhumane(thad) Inhumane(thad) and Dodge(thad, mikhail) and forall x (Inhumane(x) and Dodge(x, mikhail) -> Dodge(x, elihu)) -> therefore Dodge(thad, elihu)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The devina amount the merci. The devina amount the anett. The devina inlay the merci. The devina is ungallant. The devina is spacey. The merci amount the devina. The merci amount the anett. The merci inlay the devina. The merci inlay the anett. The merci is spacey. The merci hype the anett. The anett amount the merci. The anett does not eat the merci. The anett is spacey. The anett is wormlike. If someone amount the merci then they are cuprous. If someone is spacey and they like the anett then they eat the merci. If someone amount the anett then the anett inlay the devina. If someone amount the devina and the devina amount the merci then the devina amount the anett. If someone hype the anett and they are not ungallant then they like the devina. If someone is cuprous and they eat the merci then they eat the anett. If someone hype the merci then the merci does not eat the anett. If the devina amount the merci and the devina inlay the anett then the merci hype the devina. The merci hype the devina.", "logic": "\nAmount(devina, merci)\nAmount(devina, anett)\nInlay(devina, merci)\nUngallant(devina)\nSpacey(devina)\nAmount(merci, devina)\nAmount(merci, anett)\nInlay(merci, devina)\nInlay(merci, anett)\nSpacey(merci)\nHype(merci, anett)\nAmount(anett, merci)\nnot Inlay(anett, merci)\nSpacey(anett)\nWormlike(anett)\nforall x (Amount(x, merci) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) and Hype(x, anett) -> Inlay(x, merci))\nforall x (Amount(x, anett) -> Inlay(anett, devina))\nforall x (Amount(x, devina) and Amount(devina, merci) -> Amount(devina, anett))\nforall x (Hype(x, anett) and not Ungallant(x) -> Hype(x, devina))\nforall x (Cuprous(x) and Inlay(x, merci) -> Inlay(x, anett))\nforall x (Hype(x, merci) -> not Inlay(merci, anett))\nAmount(devina, merci) and Inlay(devina, anett) -> Hype(merci, devina)\n\nHype(merci, devina)\n\nAmount(devina, merci) and forall x (Amount(x, merci) -> Cuprous(x)) -> therefore Cuprous(devina) Cuprous(devina) and Inlay(devina, merci) and forall x (Cuprous(x) and Inlay(x, merci) -> Inlay(x, anett)) -> therefore Inlay(devina, anett) Amount(devina, merci) and Inlay(devina, anett) and Amount(devina, merci) and Inlay(devina, anett) -> Hype(merci, devina) -> therefore Hype(merci, devina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The fergus spread the patricia. The fergus spread the alfreda. The fergus shock the patricia. The fergus is soft. The fergus is peevish. The patricia spread the fergus. The patricia spread the alfreda. The patricia shock the fergus. The patricia shock the alfreda. The patricia is peevish. The patricia nuzzle the alfreda. The alfreda spread the patricia. The alfreda does not eat the patricia. The alfreda is peevish. The alfreda is horrendous. If someone spread the patricia then they are penitent. If someone is peevish and they like the alfreda then they eat the patricia. If someone spread the alfreda then the alfreda shock the fergus. If someone spread the fergus and the fergus spread the patricia then the fergus spread the alfreda. If someone nuzzle the alfreda and they are not soft then they like the fergus. If someone is penitent and they eat the patricia then they eat the alfreda. If someone nuzzle the patricia then the patricia does not eat the alfreda. If the fergus spread the patricia and the fergus shock the alfreda then the patricia nuzzle the fergus. The patricia does not like the fergus.", "logic": "\nSpread(fergus, patricia)\nSpread(fergus, alfreda)\nShock(fergus, patricia)\nSoft(fergus)\nPeevish(fergus)\nSpread(patricia, fergus)\nSpread(patricia, alfreda)\nShock(patricia, fergus)\nShock(patricia, alfreda)\nPeevish(patricia)\nNuzzle(patricia, alfreda)\nSpread(alfreda, patricia)\nnot Shock(alfreda, patricia)\nPeevish(alfreda)\nHorrendous(alfreda)\nforall x (Spread(x, patricia) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Peevish(x) and Nuzzle(x, alfreda) -> Shock(x, patricia))\nforall x (Spread(x, alfreda) -> Shock(alfreda, fergus))\nforall x (Spread(x, fergus) and Spread(fergus, patricia) -> Spread(fergus, alfreda))\nforall x (Nuzzle(x, alfreda) and not Soft(x) -> Nuzzle(x, fergus))\nforall x (Penitent(x) and Shock(x, patricia) -> Shock(x, alfreda))\nforall x (Nuzzle(x, patricia) -> not Shock(patricia, alfreda))\nSpread(fergus, patricia) and Shock(fergus, alfreda) -> Nuzzle(patricia, fergus)\n\nnot Nuzzle(patricia, fergus)\n\nSpread(fergus, patricia) and forall x (Spread(x, patricia) -> Penitent(x)) -> therefore Penitent(fergus) Penitent(fergus) and Shock(fergus, patricia) and forall x (Penitent(x) and Shock(x, patricia) -> Shock(x, alfreda)) -> therefore Shock(fergus, alfreda) Spread(fergus, patricia) and Shock(fergus, alfreda) and Spread(fergus, patricia) and Shock(fergus, alfreda) -> Nuzzle(patricia, fergus) -> therefore Nuzzle(patricia, fergus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The uriah march the judas. The uriah march the wendy. The uriah smell the judas. The uriah is mantic. The uriah is watery. The judas march the uriah. The judas march the wendy. The judas smell the uriah. The judas smell the wendy. The judas is watery. The judas toast the wendy. The wendy march the judas. The wendy does not eat the judas. The wendy is watery. The wendy is atypical. If someone march the judas then they are sliced. If someone is watery and they like the wendy then they eat the judas. If someone march the wendy then the wendy smell the uriah. If someone march the uriah and the uriah march the judas then the uriah march the wendy. If someone toast the wendy and they are not mantic then they like the uriah. If someone is sliced and they eat the judas then they eat the wendy. If someone toast the judas then the judas does not eat the wendy. If the uriah march the judas and the uriah smell the wendy then the judas toast the uriah. The wendy does not eat the wendy.", "logic": "\nMarch(uriah, judas)\nMarch(uriah, wendy)\nSmell(uriah, judas)\nMantic(uriah)\nWatery(uriah)\nMarch(judas, uriah)\nMarch(judas, wendy)\nSmell(judas, uriah)\nSmell(judas, wendy)\nWatery(judas)\nToast(judas, wendy)\nMarch(wendy, judas)\nnot Smell(wendy, judas)\nWatery(wendy)\nAtypical(wendy)\nforall x (March(x, judas) -> Sliced(x))\nforall x (Watery(x) and Toast(x, wendy) -> Smell(x, judas))\nforall x (March(x, wendy) -> Smell(wendy, uriah))\nforall x (March(x, uriah) and March(uriah, judas) -> March(uriah, wendy))\nforall x (Toast(x, wendy) and not Mantic(x) -> Toast(x, uriah))\nforall x (Sliced(x) and Smell(x, judas) -> Smell(x, wendy))\nforall x (Toast(x, judas) -> not Smell(judas, wendy))\nMarch(uriah, judas) and Smell(uriah, wendy) -> Toast(judas, uriah)\n\nnot Smell(wendy, wendy)\n\nforall x (Sliced(x) and Smell(x, judas) -> Smell(x, wendy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The ragnar liberate the dominica. The ragnar liberate the lauri. The ragnar disunite the dominica. The ragnar is seedy. The ragnar is untwisted. The dominica liberate the ragnar. The dominica liberate the lauri. The dominica disunite the ragnar. The dominica disunite the lauri. The dominica is untwisted. The dominica conspire the lauri. The lauri liberate the dominica. The lauri does not eat the dominica. The lauri is untwisted. The lauri is haemolytic. If someone liberate the dominica then they are protracted. If someone is untwisted and they like the lauri then they eat the dominica. If someone liberate the lauri then the lauri disunite the ragnar. If someone liberate the ragnar and the ragnar liberate the dominica then the ragnar liberate the lauri. If someone conspire the lauri and they are not seedy then they like the ragnar. If someone is protracted and they eat the dominica then they eat the lauri. If someone conspire the dominica then the dominica does not eat the lauri. If the ragnar liberate the dominica and the ragnar disunite the lauri then the dominica conspire the ragnar. The ragnar conspire the ragnar.", "logic": "\nLiberate(ragnar, dominica)\nLiberate(ragnar, lauri)\nDisunite(ragnar, dominica)\nSeedy(ragnar)\nUntwisted(ragnar)\nLiberate(dominica, ragnar)\nLiberate(dominica, lauri)\nDisunite(dominica, ragnar)\nDisunite(dominica, lauri)\nUntwisted(dominica)\nConspire(dominica, lauri)\nLiberate(lauri, dominica)\nnot Disunite(lauri, dominica)\nUntwisted(lauri)\nHaemolytic(lauri)\nforall x (Liberate(x, dominica) -> Protracted(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) and Conspire(x, lauri) -> Disunite(x, dominica))\nforall x (Liberate(x, lauri) -> Disunite(lauri, ragnar))\nforall x (Liberate(x, ragnar) and Liberate(ragnar, dominica) -> Liberate(ragnar, lauri))\nforall x (Conspire(x, lauri) and not Seedy(x) -> Conspire(x, ragnar))\nforall x (Protracted(x) and Disunite(x, dominica) -> Disunite(x, lauri))\nforall x (Conspire(x, dominica) -> not Disunite(dominica, lauri))\nLiberate(ragnar, dominica) and Disunite(ragnar, lauri) -> Conspire(dominica, ragnar)\n\nConspire(ragnar, ragnar)\n\nforall x (Conspire(x, lauri) and not Seedy(x) -> Conspire(x, ragnar)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The tobye salve the bunni. The tobye salve the ronalda. The tobye furnish the bunni. The tobye is unbridled. The tobye is repressive. The bunni salve the tobye. The bunni salve the ronalda. The bunni furnish the tobye. The bunni furnish the ronalda. The bunni is repressive. The bunni impend the ronalda. The ronalda salve the bunni. The ronalda does not eat the bunni. The ronalda is repressive. The ronalda is accurate. If someone salve the bunni then they are excellent. If someone is repressive and they like the ronalda then they eat the bunni. If someone salve the ronalda then the ronalda furnish the tobye. If someone salve the tobye and the tobye salve the bunni then the tobye salve the ronalda. If someone impend the ronalda and they are not unbridled then they like the tobye. If someone is excellent and they eat the bunni then they eat the ronalda. If someone impend the bunni then the bunni does not eat the ronalda. If the tobye salve the bunni and the tobye furnish the ronalda then the bunni impend the tobye. The bunni is not excellent.", "logic": "\nSalve(tobye, bunni)\nSalve(tobye, ronalda)\nFurnish(tobye, bunni)\nUnbridled(tobye)\nRepressive(tobye)\nSalve(bunni, tobye)\nSalve(bunni, ronalda)\nFurnish(bunni, tobye)\nFurnish(bunni, ronalda)\nRepressive(bunni)\nImpend(bunni, ronalda)\nSalve(ronalda, bunni)\nnot Furnish(ronalda, bunni)\nRepressive(ronalda)\nAccurate(ronalda)\nforall x (Salve(x, bunni) -> Excellent(x))\nforall x (Repressive(x) and Impend(x, ronalda) -> Furnish(x, bunni))\nforall x (Salve(x, ronalda) -> Furnish(ronalda, tobye))\nforall x (Salve(x, tobye) and Salve(tobye, bunni) -> Salve(tobye, ronalda))\nforall x (Impend(x, ronalda) and not Unbridled(x) -> Impend(x, tobye))\nforall x (Excellent(x) and Furnish(x, bunni) -> Furnish(x, ronalda))\nforall x (Impend(x, bunni) -> not Furnish(bunni, ronalda))\nSalve(tobye, bunni) and Furnish(tobye, ronalda) -> Impend(bunni, tobye)\n\nnot Excellent(bunni)\n\nforall x (Salve(x, bunni) -> Excellent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The sheela exclude the jaime. The sheela exclude the shantee. The sheela balkanize the jaime. The sheela is sunken. The sheela is adopted. The jaime exclude the sheela. The jaime exclude the shantee. The jaime balkanize the sheela. The jaime balkanize the shantee. The jaime is adopted. The jaime want the shantee. The shantee exclude the jaime. The shantee does not eat the jaime. The shantee is adopted. The shantee is downtown. If someone exclude the jaime then they are held. If someone is adopted and they like the shantee then they eat the jaime. If someone exclude the shantee then the shantee balkanize the sheela. If someone exclude the sheela and the sheela exclude the jaime then the sheela exclude the shantee. If someone want the shantee and they are not sunken then they like the sheela. If someone is held and they eat the jaime then they eat the shantee. If someone want the jaime then the jaime does not eat the shantee. If the sheela exclude the jaime and the sheela balkanize the shantee then the jaime want the sheela. The shantee want the sheela.", "logic": "\nExclude(sheela, jaime)\nExclude(sheela, shantee)\nBalkanize(sheela, jaime)\nSunken(sheela)\nAdopted(sheela)\nExclude(jaime, sheela)\nExclude(jaime, shantee)\nBalkanize(jaime, sheela)\nBalkanize(jaime, shantee)\nAdopted(jaime)\nWant(jaime, shantee)\nExclude(shantee, jaime)\nnot Balkanize(shantee, jaime)\nAdopted(shantee)\nDowntown(shantee)\nforall x (Exclude(x, jaime) -> Held(x))\nforall x (Adopted(x) and Want(x, shantee) -> Balkanize(x, jaime))\nforall x (Exclude(x, shantee) -> Balkanize(shantee, sheela))\nforall x (Exclude(x, sheela) and Exclude(sheela, jaime) -> Exclude(sheela, shantee))\nforall x (Want(x, shantee) and not Sunken(x) -> Want(x, sheela))\nforall x (Held(x) and Balkanize(x, jaime) -> Balkanize(x, shantee))\nforall x (Want(x, jaime) -> not Balkanize(jaime, shantee))\nExclude(sheela, jaime) and Balkanize(sheela, shantee) -> Want(jaime, sheela)\n\nWant(shantee, sheela)\n\nforall x (Want(x, shantee) and not Sunken(x) -> Want(x, sheela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The brittany sublet the melisande. The brittany sublet the morris. The brittany portion the melisande. The brittany is uveal. The brittany is essene. The melisande sublet the brittany. The melisande sublet the morris. The melisande portion the brittany. The melisande portion the morris. The melisande is essene. The melisande tremble the morris. The morris sublet the melisande. The morris does not eat the melisande. The morris is essene. The morris is promising. If someone sublet the melisande then they are divisional. If someone is essene and they like the morris then they eat the melisande. If someone sublet the morris then the morris portion the brittany. If someone sublet the brittany and the brittany sublet the melisande then the brittany sublet the morris. If someone tremble the morris and they are not uveal then they like the brittany. If someone is divisional and they eat the melisande then they eat the morris. If someone tremble the melisande then the melisande does not eat the morris. If the brittany sublet the melisande and the brittany portion the morris then the melisande tremble the brittany. The morris does not chase the brittany.", "logic": "\nSublet(brittany, melisande)\nSublet(brittany, morris)\nPortion(brittany, melisande)\nUveal(brittany)\nEssene(brittany)\nSublet(melisande, brittany)\nSublet(melisande, morris)\nPortion(melisande, brittany)\nPortion(melisande, morris)\nEssene(melisande)\nTremble(melisande, morris)\nSublet(morris, melisande)\nnot Portion(morris, melisande)\nEssene(morris)\nPromising(morris)\nforall x (Sublet(x, melisande) -> Divisional(x))\nforall x (Essene(x) and Tremble(x, morris) -> Portion(x, melisande))\nforall x (Sublet(x, morris) -> Portion(morris, brittany))\nforall x (Sublet(x, brittany) and Sublet(brittany, melisande) -> Sublet(brittany, morris))\nforall x (Tremble(x, morris) and not Uveal(x) -> Tremble(x, brittany))\nforall x (Divisional(x) and Portion(x, melisande) -> Portion(x, morris))\nforall x (Tremble(x, melisande) -> not Portion(melisande, morris))\nSublet(brittany, melisande) and Portion(brittany, morris) -> Tremble(melisande, brittany)\n\nnot Sublet(morris, brittany)\n\nnot Sublet(morris, brittany) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The casia bone the lionello. The casia bone the corie. The casia redeem the lionello. The casia is dustlike. The casia is tetanic. The lionello bone the casia. The lionello bone the corie. The lionello redeem the casia. The lionello redeem the corie. The lionello is tetanic. The lionello stockade the corie. The corie bone the lionello. The corie does not eat the lionello. The corie is tetanic. The corie is forgetful. If someone bone the lionello then they are foreign. If someone is tetanic and they like the corie then they eat the lionello. If someone bone the corie then the corie redeem the casia. If someone bone the casia and the casia bone the lionello then the casia bone the corie. If someone stockade the corie and they are not dustlike then they like the casia. If someone is foreign and they eat the lionello then they eat the corie. If someone stockade the lionello then the lionello does not eat the corie. If the casia bone the lionello and the casia redeem the corie then the lionello stockade the casia. The casia redeem the casia.", "logic": "\nBone(casia, lionello)\nBone(casia, corie)\nRedeem(casia, lionello)\nDustlike(casia)\nTetanic(casia)\nBone(lionello, casia)\nBone(lionello, corie)\nRedeem(lionello, casia)\nRedeem(lionello, corie)\nTetanic(lionello)\nStockade(lionello, corie)\nBone(corie, lionello)\nnot Redeem(corie, lionello)\nTetanic(corie)\nForgetful(corie)\nforall x (Bone(x, lionello) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Tetanic(x) and Stockade(x, corie) -> Redeem(x, lionello))\nforall x (Bone(x, corie) -> Redeem(corie, casia))\nforall x (Bone(x, casia) and Bone(casia, lionello) -> Bone(casia, corie))\nforall x (Stockade(x, corie) and not Dustlike(x) -> Stockade(x, casia))\nforall x (Foreign(x) and Redeem(x, lionello) -> Redeem(x, corie))\nforall x (Stockade(x, lionello) -> not Redeem(lionello, corie))\nBone(casia, lionello) and Redeem(casia, corie) -> Stockade(lionello, casia)\n\nRedeem(casia, casia)\n\nRedeem(casia, casia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The wilone lace the glynis. The wilone lace the florentia. The wilone chew the glynis. The wilone is huffish. The wilone is unawed. The glynis lace the wilone. The glynis lace the florentia. The glynis chew the wilone. The glynis chew the florentia. The glynis is unawed. The glynis injure the florentia. The florentia lace the glynis. The florentia does not eat the glynis. The florentia is unawed. The florentia is peanut. If someone lace the glynis then they are adulterous. If someone is unawed and they like the florentia then they eat the glynis. If someone lace the florentia then the florentia chew the wilone. If someone lace the wilone and the wilone lace the glynis then the wilone lace the florentia. If someone injure the florentia and they are not huffish then they like the wilone. If someone is adulterous and they eat the glynis then they eat the florentia. If someone injure the glynis then the glynis does not eat the florentia. If the wilone lace the glynis and the wilone chew the florentia then the glynis injure the wilone. The glynis is not peanut.", "logic": "\nLace(wilone, glynis)\nLace(wilone, florentia)\nChew(wilone, glynis)\nHuffish(wilone)\nUnawed(wilone)\nLace(glynis, wilone)\nLace(glynis, florentia)\nChew(glynis, wilone)\nChew(glynis, florentia)\nUnawed(glynis)\nInjure(glynis, florentia)\nLace(florentia, glynis)\nnot Chew(florentia, glynis)\nUnawed(florentia)\nPeanut(florentia)\nforall x (Lace(x, glynis) -> Adulterous(x))\nforall x (Unawed(x) and Injure(x, florentia) -> Chew(x, glynis))\nforall x (Lace(x, florentia) -> Chew(florentia, wilone))\nforall x (Lace(x, wilone) and Lace(wilone, glynis) -> Lace(wilone, florentia))\nforall x (Injure(x, florentia) and not Huffish(x) -> Injure(x, wilone))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) and Chew(x, glynis) -> Chew(x, florentia))\nforall x (Injure(x, glynis) -> not Chew(glynis, florentia))\nLace(wilone, glynis) and Chew(wilone, florentia) -> Injure(glynis, wilone)\n\nnot Peanut(glynis)\n\nnot Peanut(glynis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The pammy vilipend the charita. The pammy vilipend the genvieve. The pammy garrote the charita. The pammy is hipped. The pammy is ranking. The charita vilipend the pammy. The charita vilipend the genvieve. The charita garrote the pammy. The charita garrote the genvieve. The charita is ranking. The charita journey the genvieve. The genvieve vilipend the charita. The genvieve does not eat the charita. The genvieve is ranking. The genvieve is intruding. If someone vilipend the charita then they are biparous. If someone is ranking and they like the genvieve then they eat the charita. If someone vilipend the genvieve then the genvieve garrote the pammy. If someone vilipend the pammy and the pammy vilipend the charita then the pammy vilipend the genvieve. If someone journey the genvieve and they are not hipped then they like the pammy. If someone is biparous and they eat the charita then they eat the genvieve. If someone journey the charita then the charita does not eat the genvieve. If the pammy vilipend the charita and the pammy garrote the genvieve then the charita journey the pammy. The genvieve is cold.", "logic": "\nVilipend(pammy, charita)\nVilipend(pammy, genvieve)\nGarrote(pammy, charita)\nHipped(pammy)\nRanking(pammy)\nVilipend(charita, pammy)\nVilipend(charita, genvieve)\nGarrote(charita, pammy)\nGarrote(charita, genvieve)\nRanking(charita)\nJourney(charita, genvieve)\nVilipend(genvieve, charita)\nnot Garrote(genvieve, charita)\nRanking(genvieve)\nIntruding(genvieve)\nforall x (Vilipend(x, charita) -> Biparous(x))\nforall x (Ranking(x) and Journey(x, genvieve) -> Garrote(x, charita))\nforall x (Vilipend(x, genvieve) -> Garrote(genvieve, pammy))\nforall x (Vilipend(x, pammy) and Vilipend(pammy, charita) -> Vilipend(pammy, genvieve))\nforall x (Journey(x, genvieve) and not Hipped(x) -> Journey(x, pammy))\nforall x (Biparous(x) and Garrote(x, charita) -> Garrote(x, genvieve))\nforall x (Journey(x, charita) -> not Garrote(charita, genvieve))\nVilipend(pammy, charita) and Garrote(pammy, genvieve) -> Journey(charita, pammy)\n\nCold(genvieve)\n\nCold(genvieve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The merell signalise the therine. The harvey is immune. The therine is not phonemic. If something is marvellous then it does not chase the merell. If something signalise the therine and it signalise the harvey then the therine is not peremptory. If something is peremptory then it signalise the harvey. If something distrust the harvey then the harvey is peremptory. If something is immune then it distrust the harvey. If the merell signalise the harvey and the merell does not like the harvey then the harvey defeat the merell. The therine is not phonemic.", "logic": "\nSignalise(merell, therine)\nImmune(harvey)\nnot Phonemic(therine)\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> not Defeat(x, merell))\nforall x (Signalise(x, therine) and Signalise(x, harvey) -> not Peremptory(therine))\nforall x (Peremptory(x) -> Signalise(x, harvey))\nforall x (Distrust(x, harvey) -> Peremptory(harvey))\nforall x (Immune(x) -> Distrust(x, harvey))\nSignalise(merell, harvey) and not Distrust(merell, harvey) -> Defeat(harvey, merell)\n\nnot Phonemic(therine)\n\ntherefore not Phonemic(therine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The mirna babbitt the dottie. The hynda is octuple. The dottie is not mulish. If something is noduled then it does not chase the mirna. If something babbitt the dottie and it babbitt the hynda then the dottie is not bugged. If something is bugged then it babbitt the hynda. If something totalize the hynda then the hynda is bugged. If something is octuple then it totalize the hynda. If the mirna babbitt the hynda and the mirna does not like the hynda then the hynda underrate the mirna. The dottie is mulish.", "logic": "\nBabbitt(mirna, dottie)\nOctuple(hynda)\nnot Mulish(dottie)\nforall x (Noduled(x) -> not Underrate(x, mirna))\nforall x (Babbitt(x, dottie) and Babbitt(x, hynda) -> not Bugged(dottie))\nforall x (Bugged(x) -> Babbitt(x, hynda))\nforall x (Totalize(x, hynda) -> Bugged(hynda))\nforall x (Octuple(x) -> Totalize(x, hynda))\nBabbitt(mirna, hynda) and not Totalize(mirna, hynda) -> Underrate(hynda, mirna)\n\nMulish(dottie)\n\ntherefore not Mulish(dottie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The sharron vesiculate the martelle. The judah is dominating. The martelle is not uncaring. If something is touched then it does not chase the sharron. If something vesiculate the martelle and it vesiculate the judah then the martelle is not hominine. If something is hominine then it vesiculate the judah. If something dyke the judah then the judah is hominine. If something is dominating then it dyke the judah. If the sharron vesiculate the judah and the sharron does not like the judah then the judah cabal the sharron. The judah dyke the judah.", "logic": "\nVesiculate(sharron, martelle)\nDominating(judah)\nnot Uncaring(martelle)\nforall x (Touched(x) -> not Cabal(x, sharron))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, martelle) and Vesiculate(x, judah) -> not Hominine(martelle))\nforall x (Hominine(x) -> Vesiculate(x, judah))\nforall x (Dyke(x, judah) -> Hominine(judah))\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Dyke(x, judah))\nVesiculate(sharron, judah) and not Dyke(sharron, judah) -> Cabal(judah, sharron)\n\nDyke(judah, judah)\n\nDominating(judah) and forall x (Dominating(x) -> Dyke(x, judah)) -> therefore Dyke(judah, judah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The northrop neutralise the gilberte. The trish is hydroponic. The gilberte is not sovereign. If something is perplexed then it does not chase the northrop. If something neutralise the gilberte and it neutralise the trish then the gilberte is not abominable. If something is abominable then it neutralise the trish. If something trifle the trish then the trish is abominable. If something is hydroponic then it trifle the trish. If the northrop neutralise the trish and the northrop does not like the trish then the trish envenom the northrop. The trish does not like the trish.", "logic": "\nNeutralise(northrop, gilberte)\nHydroponic(trish)\nnot Sovereign(gilberte)\nforall x (Perplexed(x) -> not Envenom(x, northrop))\nforall x (Neutralise(x, gilberte) and Neutralise(x, trish) -> not Abominable(gilberte))\nforall x (Abominable(x) -> Neutralise(x, trish))\nforall x (Trifle(x, trish) -> Abominable(trish))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Trifle(x, trish))\nNeutralise(northrop, trish) and not Trifle(northrop, trish) -> Envenom(trish, northrop)\n\nnot Trifle(trish, trish)\n\nHydroponic(trish) and forall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Trifle(x, trish)) -> therefore Trifle(trish, trish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The joanie soot the lory. The bree is frangible. The lory is not gluttonous. If something is optical then it does not chase the joanie. If something soot the lory and it soot the bree then the lory is not irreverent. If something is irreverent then it soot the bree. If something officer the bree then the bree is irreverent. If something is frangible then it officer the bree. If the joanie soot the bree and the joanie does not like the bree then the bree capsulise the joanie. The bree is irreverent.", "logic": "\nSoot(joanie, lory)\nFrangible(bree)\nnot Gluttonous(lory)\nforall x (Optical(x) -> not Capsulise(x, joanie))\nforall x (Soot(x, lory) and Soot(x, bree) -> not Irreverent(lory))\nforall x (Irreverent(x) -> Soot(x, bree))\nforall x (Officer(x, bree) -> Irreverent(bree))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Officer(x, bree))\nSoot(joanie, bree) and not Officer(joanie, bree) -> Capsulise(bree, joanie)\n\nIrreverent(bree)\n\nFrangible(bree) and forall x (Frangible(x) -> Officer(x, bree)) -> therefore Officer(bree, bree) Officer(bree, bree) and forall x (Officer(x, bree) -> Irreverent(bree)) -> therefore Irreverent(bree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The rachael antagonize the tobi. The verine is thick. The tobi is not strong. If something is rickety then it does not chase the rachael. If something antagonize the tobi and it antagonize the verine then the tobi is not prescient. If something is prescient then it antagonize the verine. If something bewail the verine then the verine is prescient. If something is thick then it bewail the verine. If the rachael antagonize the verine and the rachael does not like the verine then the verine scarf the rachael. The verine is not prescient.", "logic": "\nAntagonize(rachael, tobi)\nThick(verine)\nnot Strong(tobi)\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> not Scarf(x, rachael))\nforall x (Antagonize(x, tobi) and Antagonize(x, verine) -> not Prescient(tobi))\nforall x (Prescient(x) -> Antagonize(x, verine))\nforall x (Bewail(x, verine) -> Prescient(verine))\nforall x (Thick(x) -> Bewail(x, verine))\nAntagonize(rachael, verine) and not Bewail(rachael, verine) -> Scarf(verine, rachael)\n\nnot Prescient(verine)\n\nThick(verine) and forall x (Thick(x) -> Bewail(x, verine)) -> therefore Bewail(verine, verine) Bewail(verine, verine) and forall x (Bewail(x, verine) -> Prescient(verine)) -> therefore Prescient(verine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The emilia waylay the elisha. The antonio is coaxal. The elisha is not regnant. If something is antibiotic then it does not chase the emilia. If something waylay the elisha and it waylay the antonio then the elisha is not alabaster. If something is alabaster then it waylay the antonio. If something iterate the antonio then the antonio is alabaster. If something is coaxal then it iterate the antonio. If the emilia waylay the antonio and the emilia does not like the antonio then the antonio loathe the emilia. The antonio waylay the antonio.", "logic": "\nWaylay(emilia, elisha)\nCoaxal(antonio)\nnot Regnant(elisha)\nforall x (Antibiotic(x) -> not Loathe(x, emilia))\nforall x (Waylay(x, elisha) and Waylay(x, antonio) -> not Alabaster(elisha))\nforall x (Alabaster(x) -> Waylay(x, antonio))\nforall x (Iterate(x, antonio) -> Alabaster(antonio))\nforall x (Coaxal(x) -> Iterate(x, antonio))\nWaylay(emilia, antonio) and not Iterate(emilia, antonio) -> Loathe(antonio, emilia)\n\nWaylay(antonio, antonio)\n\nCoaxal(antonio) and forall x (Coaxal(x) -> Iterate(x, antonio)) -> therefore Iterate(antonio, antonio) Iterate(antonio, antonio) and forall x (Iterate(x, antonio) -> Alabaster(antonio)) -> therefore Alabaster(antonio) Alabaster(antonio) and forall x (Alabaster(x) -> Waylay(x, antonio)) -> therefore Waylay(antonio, antonio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The vitoria thwack the shelden. The seth is nigerian. The shelden is not bossy. If something is cochlear then it does not chase the vitoria. If something thwack the shelden and it thwack the seth then the shelden is not qabalistic. If something is qabalistic then it thwack the seth. If something whirlpool the seth then the seth is qabalistic. If something is nigerian then it whirlpool the seth. If the vitoria thwack the seth and the vitoria does not like the seth then the seth undermine the vitoria. The seth does not see the seth.", "logic": "\nThwack(vitoria, shelden)\nNigerian(seth)\nnot Bossy(shelden)\nforall x (Cochlear(x) -> not Undermine(x, vitoria))\nforall x (Thwack(x, shelden) and Thwack(x, seth) -> not Qabalistic(shelden))\nforall x (Qabalistic(x) -> Thwack(x, seth))\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, seth) -> Qabalistic(seth))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) -> Whirlpool(x, seth))\nThwack(vitoria, seth) and not Whirlpool(vitoria, seth) -> Undermine(seth, vitoria)\n\nnot Thwack(seth, seth)\n\nNigerian(seth) and forall x (Nigerian(x) -> Whirlpool(x, seth)) -> therefore Whirlpool(seth, seth) Whirlpool(seth, seth) and forall x (Whirlpool(x, seth) -> Qabalistic(seth)) -> therefore Qabalistic(seth) Qabalistic(seth) and forall x (Qabalistic(x) -> Thwack(x, seth)) -> therefore Thwack(seth, seth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The melamie sideswipe the kamillah. The wayne is withering. The kamillah is not sardinian. If something is faded then it does not chase the melamie. If something sideswipe the kamillah and it sideswipe the wayne then the kamillah is not sophistic. If something is sophistic then it sideswipe the wayne. If something inure the wayne then the wayne is sophistic. If something is withering then it inure the wayne. If the melamie sideswipe the wayne and the melamie does not like the wayne then the wayne vitaminise the melamie. The kamillah does not like the wayne.", "logic": "\nSideswipe(melamie, kamillah)\nWithering(wayne)\nnot Sardinian(kamillah)\nforall x (Faded(x) -> not Vitaminise(x, melamie))\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, kamillah) and Sideswipe(x, wayne) -> not Sophistic(kamillah))\nforall x (Sophistic(x) -> Sideswipe(x, wayne))\nforall x (Inure(x, wayne) -> Sophistic(wayne))\nforall x (Withering(x) -> Inure(x, wayne))\nSideswipe(melamie, wayne) and not Inure(melamie, wayne) -> Vitaminise(wayne, melamie)\n\nnot Inure(kamillah, wayne)\n\nforall x (Withering(x) -> Inure(x, wayne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The riva sleek the andrei. The ingemar is cramped. The andrei is not rustproof. If something is many then it does not chase the riva. If something sleek the andrei and it sleek the ingemar then the andrei is not union. If something is union then it sleek the ingemar. If something nuzzle the ingemar then the ingemar is union. If something is cramped then it nuzzle the ingemar. If the riva sleek the ingemar and the riva does not like the ingemar then the ingemar article the riva. The ingemar article the riva.", "logic": "\nSleek(riva, andrei)\nCramped(ingemar)\nnot Rustproof(andrei)\nforall x (Many(x) -> not Article(x, riva))\nforall x (Sleek(x, andrei) and Sleek(x, ingemar) -> not Union(andrei))\nforall x (Union(x) -> Sleek(x, ingemar))\nforall x (Nuzzle(x, ingemar) -> Union(ingemar))\nforall x (Cramped(x) -> Nuzzle(x, ingemar))\nSleek(riva, ingemar) and not Nuzzle(riva, ingemar) -> Article(ingemar, riva)\n\nArticle(ingemar, riva)\n\nSleek(riva, ingemar) and not Nuzzle(riva, ingemar) -> Article(ingemar, riva) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The annamaria sunder the shani. The damian is svelte. The shani is not weepy. If something is supreme then it does not chase the annamaria. If something sunder the shani and it sunder the damian then the shani is not playable. If something is playable then it sunder the damian. If something fear the damian then the damian is playable. If something is svelte then it fear the damian. If the annamaria sunder the damian and the annamaria does not like the damian then the damian secure the annamaria. The annamaria does not like the damian.", "logic": "\nSunder(annamaria, shani)\nSvelte(damian)\nnot Weepy(shani)\nforall x (Supreme(x) -> not Secure(x, annamaria))\nforall x (Sunder(x, shani) and Sunder(x, damian) -> not Playable(shani))\nforall x (Playable(x) -> Sunder(x, damian))\nforall x (Fear(x, damian) -> Playable(damian))\nforall x (Svelte(x) -> Fear(x, damian))\nSunder(annamaria, damian) and not Fear(annamaria, damian) -> Secure(damian, annamaria)\n\nnot Fear(annamaria, damian)\n\nforall x (Svelte(x) -> Fear(x, damian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The berkie escape the retha. The brynn is zolaesque. The retha is not detachable. If something is grapy then it does not chase the berkie. If something escape the retha and it escape the brynn then the retha is not conic. If something is conic then it escape the brynn. If something colorcast the brynn then the brynn is conic. If something is zolaesque then it colorcast the brynn. If the berkie escape the brynn and the berkie does not like the brynn then the brynn torment the berkie. The berkie escape the brynn.", "logic": "\nEscape(berkie, retha)\nZolaesque(brynn)\nnot Detachable(retha)\nforall x (Grapy(x) -> not Torment(x, berkie))\nforall x (Escape(x, retha) and Escape(x, brynn) -> not Conic(retha))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Escape(x, brynn))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, brynn) -> Conic(brynn))\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) -> Colorcast(x, brynn))\nEscape(berkie, brynn) and not Colorcast(berkie, brynn) -> Torment(brynn, berkie)\n\nEscape(berkie, brynn)\n\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Escape(x, brynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The eric dive the karisa. The pearla is cropped. The karisa is not topless. If something is beauteous then it does not chase the eric. If something dive the karisa and it dive the pearla then the karisa is not reproving. If something is reproving then it dive the pearla. If something endure the pearla then the pearla is reproving. If something is cropped then it endure the pearla. If the eric dive the pearla and the eric does not like the pearla then the pearla shmooze the eric. The pearla does not see the eric.", "logic": "\nDive(eric, karisa)\nCropped(pearla)\nnot Topless(karisa)\nforall x (Beauteous(x) -> not Shmooze(x, eric))\nforall x (Dive(x, karisa) and Dive(x, pearla) -> not Reproving(karisa))\nforall x (Reproving(x) -> Dive(x, pearla))\nforall x (Endure(x, pearla) -> Reproving(pearla))\nforall x (Cropped(x) -> Endure(x, pearla))\nDive(eric, pearla) and not Endure(eric, pearla) -> Shmooze(pearla, eric)\n\nnot Dive(pearla, eric)\n\nnot Dive(pearla, eric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The ingram detoxify the finn. The andre is fireproof. The finn is not armorial. If something is canned then it does not chase the ingram. If something detoxify the finn and it detoxify the andre then the finn is not bicapsular. If something is bicapsular then it detoxify the andre. If something unlearn the andre then the andre is bicapsular. If something is fireproof then it unlearn the andre. If the ingram detoxify the andre and the ingram does not like the andre then the andre egest the ingram. The finn unlearn the ingram.", "logic": "\nDetoxify(ingram, finn)\nFireproof(andre)\nnot Armorial(finn)\nforall x (Canned(x) -> not Egest(x, ingram))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, finn) and Detoxify(x, andre) -> not Bicapsular(finn))\nforall x (Bicapsular(x) -> Detoxify(x, andre))\nforall x (Unlearn(x, andre) -> Bicapsular(andre))\nforall x (Fireproof(x) -> Unlearn(x, andre))\nDetoxify(ingram, andre) and not Unlearn(ingram, andre) -> Egest(andre, ingram)\n\nUnlearn(finn, ingram)\n\nUnlearn(finn, ingram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The julietta flense the julina. The clemence is tactical. The julina is not congruent. If something is close then it does not chase the julietta. If something flense the julina and it flense the clemence then the julina is not sugary. If something is sugary then it flense the clemence. If something illegalize the clemence then the clemence is sugary. If something is tactical then it illegalize the clemence. If the julietta flense the clemence and the julietta does not like the clemence then the clemence thresh the julietta. The clemence is not close.", "logic": "\nFlense(julietta, julina)\nTactical(clemence)\nnot Congruent(julina)\nforall x (Close(x) -> not Thresh(x, julietta))\nforall x (Flense(x, julina) and Flense(x, clemence) -> not Sugary(julina))\nforall x (Sugary(x) -> Flense(x, clemence))\nforall x (Illegalize(x, clemence) -> Sugary(clemence))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Illegalize(x, clemence))\nFlense(julietta, clemence) and not Illegalize(julietta, clemence) -> Thresh(clemence, julietta)\n\nnot Close(clemence)\n\nnot Close(clemence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The berget gladden the kaile. The auberta is snuff. The kaile is not smothered. If something is graven then it does not chase the berget. If something gladden the kaile and it gladden the auberta then the kaile is not rowdy. If something is rowdy then it gladden the auberta. If something murk the auberta then the auberta is rowdy. If something is snuff then it murk the auberta. If the berget gladden the auberta and the berget does not like the auberta then the auberta bedew the berget. The kaile is graven.", "logic": "\nGladden(berget, kaile)\nSnuff(auberta)\nnot Smothered(kaile)\nforall x (Graven(x) -> not Bedew(x, berget))\nforall x (Gladden(x, kaile) and Gladden(x, auberta) -> not Rowdy(kaile))\nforall x (Rowdy(x) -> Gladden(x, auberta))\nforall x (Murk(x, auberta) -> Rowdy(auberta))\nforall x (Snuff(x) -> Murk(x, auberta))\nGladden(berget, auberta) and not Murk(berget, auberta) -> Bedew(auberta, berget)\n\nGraven(kaile)\n\nGraven(kaile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The malanie spotweld the cordie. The malanie does not visit the sutton. The sutton strip the cordie. The sutton is not canned. The sutton is overhanded. The sutton spotweld the cordie. The kaye is untested. The kaye is overhanded. The kaye does not like the malanie. The kaye does not like the cordie. The cordie is not untested. The cordie spotweld the malanie. If someone strip the malanie and the malanie spotweld the kaye then they do not eat the kaye. All straw people are canned. If someone spotweld the malanie and the malanie is not untested then they do not like the kaye. If someone curtsey the malanie then they like the kaye. If someone spotweld the kaye then the kaye is not canned. If someone strip the sutton and the sutton spotweld the cordie then the cordie spotweld the kaye. If someone spotweld the malanie and the malanie spotweld the cordie then the malanie strip the sutton. If someone spotweld the malanie then the malanie does not eat the kaye. The malanie does not visit the sutton.", "logic": "\nSpotweld(malanie, cordie)\nnot Curtsey(malanie, sutton)\nStrip(sutton, cordie)\nnot Canned(sutton)\nOverhanded(sutton)\nSpotweld(sutton, cordie)\nUntested(kaye)\nOverhanded(kaye)\nnot Spotweld(kaye, malanie)\nnot Spotweld(kaye, cordie)\nnot Untested(cordie)\nSpotweld(cordie, malanie)\nforall x (Strip(x, malanie) and Spotweld(malanie, kaye) -> not Strip(x, kaye))\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, malanie) and not Untested(malanie) -> not Spotweld(x, kaye))\nforall x (Curtsey(x, malanie) -> Spotweld(x, kaye))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, kaye) -> not Canned(kaye))\nforall x (Strip(x, sutton) and Spotweld(sutton, cordie) -> Spotweld(cordie, kaye))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, malanie) and Spotweld(malanie, cordie) -> Strip(malanie, sutton))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, malanie) -> not Strip(malanie, kaye))\n\nnot Curtsey(malanie, sutton)\n\ntherefore not Curtsey(malanie, sutton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The irina feed the ulrick. The irina does not visit the isabella. The isabella cater the ulrick. The isabella is not divers. The isabella is univalve. The isabella feed the ulrick. The daniele is unbloody. The daniele is univalve. The daniele does not like the irina. The daniele does not like the ulrick. The ulrick is not unbloody. The ulrick feed the irina. If someone cater the irina and the irina feed the daniele then they do not eat the daniele. All liquescent people are divers. If someone feed the irina and the irina is not unbloody then they do not like the daniele. If someone cabin the irina then they like the daniele. If someone feed the daniele then the daniele is not divers. If someone cater the isabella and the isabella feed the ulrick then the ulrick feed the daniele. If someone feed the irina and the irina feed the ulrick then the irina cater the isabella. If someone feed the irina then the irina does not eat the daniele. The isabella does not eat the ulrick.", "logic": "\nFeed(irina, ulrick)\nnot Cabin(irina, isabella)\nCater(isabella, ulrick)\nnot Divers(isabella)\nUnivalve(isabella)\nFeed(isabella, ulrick)\nUnbloody(daniele)\nUnivalve(daniele)\nnot Feed(daniele, irina)\nnot Feed(daniele, ulrick)\nnot Unbloody(ulrick)\nFeed(ulrick, irina)\nforall x (Cater(x, irina) and Feed(irina, daniele) -> not Cater(x, daniele))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) -> Divers(x))\nforall x (Feed(x, irina) and not Unbloody(irina) -> not Feed(x, daniele))\nforall x (Cabin(x, irina) -> Feed(x, daniele))\nforall x (Feed(x, daniele) -> not Divers(daniele))\nforall x (Cater(x, isabella) and Feed(isabella, ulrick) -> Feed(ulrick, daniele))\nforall x (Feed(x, irina) and Feed(irina, ulrick) -> Cater(irina, isabella))\nforall x (Feed(x, irina) -> not Cater(irina, daniele))\n\nnot Cater(isabella, ulrick)\n\ntherefore Cater(isabella, ulrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The dea risk the tawnya. The dea does not visit the giorgia. The giorgia appall the tawnya. The giorgia is not tingling. The giorgia is healthy. The giorgia risk the tawnya. The florice is zygomatic. The florice is healthy. The florice does not like the dea. The florice does not like the tawnya. The tawnya is not zygomatic. The tawnya risk the dea. If someone appall the dea and the dea risk the florice then they do not eat the florice. All variolar people are tingling. If someone risk the dea and the dea is not zygomatic then they do not like the florice. If someone abuse the dea then they like the florice. If someone risk the florice then the florice is not tingling. If someone appall the giorgia and the giorgia risk the tawnya then the tawnya risk the florice. If someone risk the dea and the dea risk the tawnya then the dea appall the giorgia. If someone risk the dea then the dea does not eat the florice. The dea appall the giorgia.", "logic": "\nRisk(dea, tawnya)\nnot Abuse(dea, giorgia)\nAppall(giorgia, tawnya)\nnot Tingling(giorgia)\nHealthy(giorgia)\nRisk(giorgia, tawnya)\nZygomatic(florice)\nHealthy(florice)\nnot Risk(florice, dea)\nnot Risk(florice, tawnya)\nnot Zygomatic(tawnya)\nRisk(tawnya, dea)\nforall x (Appall(x, dea) and Risk(dea, florice) -> not Appall(x, florice))\nforall x (Variolar(x) -> Tingling(x))\nforall x (Risk(x, dea) and not Zygomatic(dea) -> not Risk(x, florice))\nforall x (Abuse(x, dea) -> Risk(x, florice))\nforall x (Risk(x, florice) -> not Tingling(florice))\nforall x (Appall(x, giorgia) and Risk(giorgia, tawnya) -> Risk(tawnya, florice))\nforall x (Risk(x, dea) and Risk(dea, tawnya) -> Appall(dea, giorgia))\nforall x (Risk(x, dea) -> not Appall(dea, florice))\n\nAppall(dea, giorgia)\n\nRisk(tawnya, dea) and Risk(dea, tawnya) and forall x (Risk(x, dea) and Risk(dea, tawnya) -> Appall(dea, giorgia)) -> therefore Appall(dea, giorgia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The pier whirr the tildie. The pier does not visit the sheena. The sheena overpraise the tildie. The sheena is not hexagonal. The sheena is venereal. The sheena whirr the tildie. The jeffrey is unseemly. The jeffrey is venereal. The jeffrey does not like the pier. The jeffrey does not like the tildie. The tildie is not unseemly. The tildie whirr the pier. If someone overpraise the pier and the pier whirr the jeffrey then they do not eat the jeffrey. All archaean people are hexagonal. If someone whirr the pier and the pier is not unseemly then they do not like the jeffrey. If someone honey the pier then they like the jeffrey. If someone whirr the jeffrey then the jeffrey is not hexagonal. If someone overpraise the sheena and the sheena whirr the tildie then the tildie whirr the jeffrey. If someone whirr the pier and the pier whirr the tildie then the pier overpraise the sheena. If someone whirr the pier then the pier does not eat the jeffrey. The pier does not eat the sheena.", "logic": "\nWhirr(pier, tildie)\nnot Honey(pier, sheena)\nOverpraise(sheena, tildie)\nnot Hexagonal(sheena)\nVenereal(sheena)\nWhirr(sheena, tildie)\nUnseemly(jeffrey)\nVenereal(jeffrey)\nnot Whirr(jeffrey, pier)\nnot Whirr(jeffrey, tildie)\nnot Unseemly(tildie)\nWhirr(tildie, pier)\nforall x (Overpraise(x, pier) and Whirr(pier, jeffrey) -> not Overpraise(x, jeffrey))\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Whirr(x, pier) and not Unseemly(pier) -> not Whirr(x, jeffrey))\nforall x (Honey(x, pier) -> Whirr(x, jeffrey))\nforall x (Whirr(x, jeffrey) -> not Hexagonal(jeffrey))\nforall x (Overpraise(x, sheena) and Whirr(sheena, tildie) -> Whirr(tildie, jeffrey))\nforall x (Whirr(x, pier) and Whirr(pier, tildie) -> Overpraise(pier, sheena))\nforall x (Whirr(x, pier) -> not Overpraise(pier, jeffrey))\n\nnot Overpraise(pier, sheena)\n\nWhirr(tildie, pier) and Whirr(pier, tildie) and forall x (Whirr(x, pier) and Whirr(pier, tildie) -> Overpraise(pier, sheena)) -> therefore Overpraise(pier, sheena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The huntlee exile the janel. The huntlee does not visit the lucinda. The lucinda shoulder the janel. The lucinda is not jelled. The lucinda is sniffy. The lucinda exile the janel. The deidre is chitinous. The deidre is sniffy. The deidre does not like the huntlee. The deidre does not like the janel. The janel is not chitinous. The janel exile the huntlee. If someone shoulder the huntlee and the huntlee exile the deidre then they do not eat the deidre. All catalectic people are jelled. If someone exile the huntlee and the huntlee is not chitinous then they do not like the deidre. If someone booze the huntlee then they like the deidre. If someone exile the deidre then the deidre is not jelled. If someone shoulder the lucinda and the lucinda exile the janel then the janel exile the deidre. If someone exile the huntlee and the huntlee exile the janel then the huntlee shoulder the lucinda. If someone exile the huntlee then the huntlee does not eat the deidre. The janel exile the deidre.", "logic": "\nExile(huntlee, janel)\nnot Booze(huntlee, lucinda)\nShoulder(lucinda, janel)\nnot Jelled(lucinda)\nSniffy(lucinda)\nExile(lucinda, janel)\nChitinous(deidre)\nSniffy(deidre)\nnot Exile(deidre, huntlee)\nnot Exile(deidre, janel)\nnot Chitinous(janel)\nExile(janel, huntlee)\nforall x (Shoulder(x, huntlee) and Exile(huntlee, deidre) -> not Shoulder(x, deidre))\nforall x (Catalectic(x) -> Jelled(x))\nforall x (Exile(x, huntlee) and not Chitinous(huntlee) -> not Exile(x, deidre))\nforall x (Booze(x, huntlee) -> Exile(x, deidre))\nforall x (Exile(x, deidre) -> not Jelled(deidre))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, lucinda) and Exile(lucinda, janel) -> Exile(janel, deidre))\nforall x (Exile(x, huntlee) and Exile(huntlee, janel) -> Shoulder(huntlee, lucinda))\nforall x (Exile(x, huntlee) -> not Shoulder(huntlee, deidre))\n\nExile(janel, deidre)\n\nExile(janel, huntlee) and Exile(huntlee, janel) and forall x (Exile(x, huntlee) and Exile(huntlee, janel) -> Shoulder(huntlee, lucinda)) -> therefore Shoulder(huntlee, lucinda) Shoulder(huntlee, lucinda) and Exile(lucinda, janel) and forall x (Shoulder(x, lucinda) and Exile(lucinda, janel) -> Exile(janel, deidre)) -> therefore Exile(janel, deidre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The kippie imbricate the clarisse. The kippie does not visit the elisa. The elisa noose the clarisse. The elisa is not aseptic. The elisa is validated. The elisa imbricate the clarisse. The erda is kept. The erda is validated. The erda does not like the kippie. The erda does not like the clarisse. The clarisse is not kept. The clarisse imbricate the kippie. If someone noose the kippie and the kippie imbricate the erda then they do not eat the erda. All mucoidal people are aseptic. If someone imbricate the kippie and the kippie is not kept then they do not like the erda. If someone eternise the kippie then they like the erda. If someone imbricate the erda then the erda is not aseptic. If someone noose the elisa and the elisa imbricate the clarisse then the clarisse imbricate the erda. If someone imbricate the kippie and the kippie imbricate the clarisse then the kippie noose the elisa. If someone imbricate the kippie then the kippie does not eat the erda. The clarisse does not like the erda.", "logic": "\nImbricate(kippie, clarisse)\nnot Eternise(kippie, elisa)\nNoose(elisa, clarisse)\nnot Aseptic(elisa)\nValidated(elisa)\nImbricate(elisa, clarisse)\nKept(erda)\nValidated(erda)\nnot Imbricate(erda, kippie)\nnot Imbricate(erda, clarisse)\nnot Kept(clarisse)\nImbricate(clarisse, kippie)\nforall x (Noose(x, kippie) and Imbricate(kippie, erda) -> not Noose(x, erda))\nforall x (Mucoidal(x) -> Aseptic(x))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, kippie) and not Kept(kippie) -> not Imbricate(x, erda))\nforall x (Eternise(x, kippie) -> Imbricate(x, erda))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, erda) -> not Aseptic(erda))\nforall x (Noose(x, elisa) and Imbricate(elisa, clarisse) -> Imbricate(clarisse, erda))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, kippie) and Imbricate(kippie, clarisse) -> Noose(kippie, elisa))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, kippie) -> not Noose(kippie, erda))\n\nnot Imbricate(clarisse, erda)\n\nImbricate(clarisse, kippie) and Imbricate(kippie, clarisse) and forall x (Imbricate(x, kippie) and Imbricate(kippie, clarisse) -> Noose(kippie, elisa)) -> therefore Noose(kippie, elisa) Noose(kippie, elisa) and Imbricate(elisa, clarisse) and forall x (Noose(x, elisa) and Imbricate(elisa, clarisse) -> Imbricate(clarisse, erda)) -> therefore Imbricate(clarisse, erda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The vernice drone the julie. The vernice does not visit the ayn. The ayn becalm the julie. The ayn is not assentient. The ayn is infallible. The ayn drone the julie. The etienne is shipboard. The etienne is infallible. The etienne does not like the vernice. The etienne does not like the julie. The julie is not shipboard. The julie drone the vernice. If someone becalm the vernice and the vernice drone the etienne then they do not eat the etienne. All peopled people are assentient. If someone drone the vernice and the vernice is not shipboard then they do not like the etienne. If someone exaggerate the vernice then they like the etienne. If someone drone the etienne then the etienne is not assentient. If someone becalm the ayn and the ayn drone the julie then the julie drone the etienne. If someone drone the vernice and the vernice drone the julie then the vernice becalm the ayn. If someone drone the vernice then the vernice does not eat the etienne. The etienne is not assentient.", "logic": "\nDrone(vernice, julie)\nnot Exaggerate(vernice, ayn)\nBecalm(ayn, julie)\nnot Assentient(ayn)\nInfallible(ayn)\nDrone(ayn, julie)\nShipboard(etienne)\nInfallible(etienne)\nnot Drone(etienne, vernice)\nnot Drone(etienne, julie)\nnot Shipboard(julie)\nDrone(julie, vernice)\nforall x (Becalm(x, vernice) and Drone(vernice, etienne) -> not Becalm(x, etienne))\nforall x (Peopled(x) -> Assentient(x))\nforall x (Drone(x, vernice) and not Shipboard(vernice) -> not Drone(x, etienne))\nforall x (Exaggerate(x, vernice) -> Drone(x, etienne))\nforall x (Drone(x, etienne) -> not Assentient(etienne))\nforall x (Becalm(x, ayn) and Drone(ayn, julie) -> Drone(julie, etienne))\nforall x (Drone(x, vernice) and Drone(vernice, julie) -> Becalm(vernice, ayn))\nforall x (Drone(x, vernice) -> not Becalm(vernice, etienne))\n\nnot Assentient(etienne)\n\nDrone(julie, vernice) and Drone(vernice, julie) and forall x (Drone(x, vernice) and Drone(vernice, julie) -> Becalm(vernice, ayn)) -> therefore Becalm(vernice, ayn) Becalm(vernice, ayn) and Drone(ayn, julie) and forall x (Becalm(x, ayn) and Drone(ayn, julie) -> Drone(julie, etienne)) -> therefore Drone(julie, etienne) Drone(julie, etienne) and forall x (Drone(x, etienne) -> not Assentient(etienne)) -> therefore not Assentient(etienne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The arne cause the gerold. The arne does not visit the parker. The parker pine the gerold. The parker is not twofold. The parker is fusty. The parker cause the gerold. The ingamar is geodesic. The ingamar is fusty. The ingamar does not like the arne. The ingamar does not like the gerold. The gerold is not geodesic. The gerold cause the arne. If someone pine the arne and the arne cause the ingamar then they do not eat the ingamar. All glassless people are twofold. If someone cause the arne and the arne is not geodesic then they do not like the ingamar. If someone flout the arne then they like the ingamar. If someone cause the ingamar then the ingamar is not twofold. If someone pine the parker and the parker cause the gerold then the gerold cause the ingamar. If someone cause the arne and the arne cause the gerold then the arne pine the parker. If someone cause the arne then the arne does not eat the ingamar. The ingamar is twofold.", "logic": "\nCause(arne, gerold)\nnot Flout(arne, parker)\nPine(parker, gerold)\nnot Twofold(parker)\nFusty(parker)\nCause(parker, gerold)\nGeodesic(ingamar)\nFusty(ingamar)\nnot Cause(ingamar, arne)\nnot Cause(ingamar, gerold)\nnot Geodesic(gerold)\nCause(gerold, arne)\nforall x (Pine(x, arne) and Cause(arne, ingamar) -> not Pine(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Glassless(x) -> Twofold(x))\nforall x (Cause(x, arne) and not Geodesic(arne) -> not Cause(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Flout(x, arne) -> Cause(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Cause(x, ingamar) -> not Twofold(ingamar))\nforall x (Pine(x, parker) and Cause(parker, gerold) -> Cause(gerold, ingamar))\nforall x (Cause(x, arne) and Cause(arne, gerold) -> Pine(arne, parker))\nforall x (Cause(x, arne) -> not Pine(arne, ingamar))\n\nTwofold(ingamar)\n\nCause(gerold, arne) and Cause(arne, gerold) and forall x (Cause(x, arne) and Cause(arne, gerold) -> Pine(arne, parker)) -> therefore Pine(arne, parker) Pine(arne, parker) and Cause(parker, gerold) and forall x (Pine(x, parker) and Cause(parker, gerold) -> Cause(gerold, ingamar)) -> therefore Cause(gerold, ingamar) Cause(gerold, ingamar) and forall x (Cause(x, ingamar) -> not Twofold(ingamar)) -> therefore not Twofold(ingamar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The ambrosi undergrow the jerry. The ambrosi does not visit the zachery. The zachery query the jerry. The zachery is not attachable. The zachery is foursquare. The zachery undergrow the jerry. The dudley is obnoxious. The dudley is foursquare. The dudley does not like the ambrosi. The dudley does not like the jerry. The jerry is not obnoxious. The jerry undergrow the ambrosi. If someone query the ambrosi and the ambrosi undergrow the dudley then they do not eat the dudley. All much people are attachable. If someone undergrow the ambrosi and the ambrosi is not obnoxious then they do not like the dudley. If someone faggot the ambrosi then they like the dudley. If someone undergrow the dudley then the dudley is not attachable. If someone query the zachery and the zachery undergrow the jerry then the jerry undergrow the dudley. If someone undergrow the ambrosi and the ambrosi undergrow the jerry then the ambrosi query the zachery. If someone undergrow the ambrosi then the ambrosi does not eat the dudley. The ambrosi does not like the dudley.", "logic": "\nUndergrow(ambrosi, jerry)\nnot Faggot(ambrosi, zachery)\nQuery(zachery, jerry)\nnot Attachable(zachery)\nFoursquare(zachery)\nUndergrow(zachery, jerry)\nObnoxious(dudley)\nFoursquare(dudley)\nnot Undergrow(dudley, ambrosi)\nnot Undergrow(dudley, jerry)\nnot Obnoxious(jerry)\nUndergrow(jerry, ambrosi)\nforall x (Query(x, ambrosi) and Undergrow(ambrosi, dudley) -> not Query(x, dudley))\nforall x (Much(x) -> Attachable(x))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, ambrosi) and not Obnoxious(ambrosi) -> not Undergrow(x, dudley))\nforall x (Faggot(x, ambrosi) -> Undergrow(x, dudley))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, dudley) -> not Attachable(dudley))\nforall x (Query(x, zachery) and Undergrow(zachery, jerry) -> Undergrow(jerry, dudley))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, ambrosi) and Undergrow(ambrosi, jerry) -> Query(ambrosi, zachery))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, ambrosi) -> not Query(ambrosi, dudley))\n\nnot Undergrow(ambrosi, dudley)\n\nforall x (Faggot(x, ambrosi) -> Undergrow(x, dudley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The marko hear the logan. The marko does not visit the ricki. The ricki deposit the logan. The ricki is not libidinal. The ricki is impartial. The ricki hear the logan. The shayne is plumlike. The shayne is impartial. The shayne does not like the marko. The shayne does not like the logan. The logan is not plumlike. The logan hear the marko. If someone deposit the marko and the marko hear the shayne then they do not eat the shayne. All tautologic people are libidinal. If someone hear the marko and the marko is not plumlike then they do not like the shayne. If someone clap the marko then they like the shayne. If someone hear the shayne then the shayne is not libidinal. If someone deposit the ricki and the ricki hear the logan then the logan hear the shayne. If someone hear the marko and the marko hear the logan then the marko deposit the ricki. If someone hear the marko then the marko does not eat the shayne. The ricki hear the shayne.", "logic": "\nHear(marko, logan)\nnot Clap(marko, ricki)\nDeposit(ricki, logan)\nnot Libidinal(ricki)\nImpartial(ricki)\nHear(ricki, logan)\nPlumlike(shayne)\nImpartial(shayne)\nnot Hear(shayne, marko)\nnot Hear(shayne, logan)\nnot Plumlike(logan)\nHear(logan, marko)\nforall x (Deposit(x, marko) and Hear(marko, shayne) -> not Deposit(x, shayne))\nforall x (Tautologic(x) -> Libidinal(x))\nforall x (Hear(x, marko) and not Plumlike(marko) -> not Hear(x, shayne))\nforall x (Clap(x, marko) -> Hear(x, shayne))\nforall x (Hear(x, shayne) -> not Libidinal(shayne))\nforall x (Deposit(x, ricki) and Hear(ricki, logan) -> Hear(logan, shayne))\nforall x (Hear(x, marko) and Hear(marko, logan) -> Deposit(marko, ricki))\nforall x (Hear(x, marko) -> not Deposit(marko, shayne))\n\nHear(ricki, shayne)\n\nforall x (Clap(x, marko) -> Hear(x, shayne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The cindy scowl the tadeas. The cindy does not visit the josi. The josi purpose the tadeas. The josi is not semite. The josi is wheeled. The josi scowl the tadeas. The ange is liverish. The ange is wheeled. The ange does not like the cindy. The ange does not like the tadeas. The tadeas is not liverish. The tadeas scowl the cindy. If someone purpose the cindy and the cindy scowl the ange then they do not eat the ange. All pretty people are semite. If someone scowl the cindy and the cindy is not liverish then they do not like the ange. If someone westernize the cindy then they like the ange. If someone scowl the ange then the ange is not semite. If someone purpose the josi and the josi scowl the tadeas then the tadeas scowl the ange. If someone scowl the cindy and the cindy scowl the tadeas then the cindy purpose the josi. If someone scowl the cindy then the cindy does not eat the ange. The cindy is not semite.", "logic": "\nScowl(cindy, tadeas)\nnot Westernize(cindy, josi)\nPurpose(josi, tadeas)\nnot Semite(josi)\nWheeled(josi)\nScowl(josi, tadeas)\nLiverish(ange)\nWheeled(ange)\nnot Scowl(ange, cindy)\nnot Scowl(ange, tadeas)\nnot Liverish(tadeas)\nScowl(tadeas, cindy)\nforall x (Purpose(x, cindy) and Scowl(cindy, ange) -> not Purpose(x, ange))\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Scowl(x, cindy) and not Liverish(cindy) -> not Scowl(x, ange))\nforall x (Westernize(x, cindy) -> Scowl(x, ange))\nforall x (Scowl(x, ange) -> not Semite(ange))\nforall x (Purpose(x, josi) and Scowl(josi, tadeas) -> Scowl(tadeas, ange))\nforall x (Scowl(x, cindy) and Scowl(cindy, tadeas) -> Purpose(cindy, josi))\nforall x (Scowl(x, cindy) -> not Purpose(cindy, ange))\n\nnot Semite(cindy)\n\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Semite(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The niles buttonhole the ardyce. The niles does not visit the ram. The ram clack the ardyce. The ram is not unrevived. The ram is unabated. The ram buttonhole the ardyce. The viva is hadal. The viva is unabated. The viva does not like the niles. The viva does not like the ardyce. The ardyce is not hadal. The ardyce buttonhole the niles. If someone clack the niles and the niles buttonhole the viva then they do not eat the viva. All monthlong people are unrevived. If someone buttonhole the niles and the niles is not hadal then they do not like the viva. If someone quieten the niles then they like the viva. If someone buttonhole the viva then the viva is not unrevived. If someone clack the ram and the ram buttonhole the ardyce then the ardyce buttonhole the viva. If someone buttonhole the niles and the niles buttonhole the ardyce then the niles clack the ram. If someone buttonhole the niles then the niles does not eat the viva. The viva buttonhole the viva.", "logic": "\nButtonhole(niles, ardyce)\nnot Quieten(niles, ram)\nClack(ram, ardyce)\nnot Unrevived(ram)\nUnabated(ram)\nButtonhole(ram, ardyce)\nHadal(viva)\nUnabated(viva)\nnot Buttonhole(viva, niles)\nnot Buttonhole(viva, ardyce)\nnot Hadal(ardyce)\nButtonhole(ardyce, niles)\nforall x (Clack(x, niles) and Buttonhole(niles, viva) -> not Clack(x, viva))\nforall x (Monthlong(x) -> Unrevived(x))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, niles) and not Hadal(niles) -> not Buttonhole(x, viva))\nforall x (Quieten(x, niles) -> Buttonhole(x, viva))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, viva) -> not Unrevived(viva))\nforall x (Clack(x, ram) and Buttonhole(ram, ardyce) -> Buttonhole(ardyce, viva))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, niles) and Buttonhole(niles, ardyce) -> Clack(niles, ram))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, niles) -> not Clack(niles, viva))\n\nButtonhole(viva, viva)\n\nforall x (Quieten(x, niles) -> Buttonhole(x, viva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The taylor propagate the doreen. The taylor does not visit the babita. The babita beguile the doreen. The babita is not plentiful. The babita is vibratory. The babita propagate the doreen. The katharine is filled. The katharine is vibratory. The katharine does not like the taylor. The katharine does not like the doreen. The doreen is not filled. The doreen propagate the taylor. If someone beguile the taylor and the taylor propagate the katharine then they do not eat the katharine. All tiptoe people are plentiful. If someone propagate the taylor and the taylor is not filled then they do not like the katharine. If someone controvert the taylor then they like the katharine. If someone propagate the katharine then the katharine is not plentiful. If someone beguile the babita and the babita propagate the doreen then the doreen propagate the katharine. If someone propagate the taylor and the taylor propagate the doreen then the taylor beguile the babita. If someone propagate the taylor then the taylor does not eat the katharine. The katharine is not tiptoe.", "logic": "\nPropagate(taylor, doreen)\nnot Controvert(taylor, babita)\nBeguile(babita, doreen)\nnot Plentiful(babita)\nVibratory(babita)\nPropagate(babita, doreen)\nFilled(katharine)\nVibratory(katharine)\nnot Propagate(katharine, taylor)\nnot Propagate(katharine, doreen)\nnot Filled(doreen)\nPropagate(doreen, taylor)\nforall x (Beguile(x, taylor) and Propagate(taylor, katharine) -> not Beguile(x, katharine))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Propagate(x, taylor) and not Filled(taylor) -> not Propagate(x, katharine))\nforall x (Controvert(x, taylor) -> Propagate(x, katharine))\nforall x (Propagate(x, katharine) -> not Plentiful(katharine))\nforall x (Beguile(x, babita) and Propagate(babita, doreen) -> Propagate(doreen, katharine))\nforall x (Propagate(x, taylor) and Propagate(taylor, doreen) -> Beguile(taylor, babita))\nforall x (Propagate(x, taylor) -> not Beguile(taylor, katharine))\n\nnot Tiptoe(katharine)\n\nnot Tiptoe(katharine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The claude reseat the davon. The claude does not visit the isabeau. The isabeau falter the davon. The isabeau is not lxxviii. The isabeau is parallel. The isabeau reseat the davon. The robinet is shellproof. The robinet is parallel. The robinet does not like the claude. The robinet does not like the davon. The davon is not shellproof. The davon reseat the claude. If someone falter the claude and the claude reseat the robinet then they do not eat the robinet. All dendriform people are lxxviii. If someone reseat the claude and the claude is not shellproof then they do not like the robinet. If someone federalize the claude then they like the robinet. If someone reseat the robinet then the robinet is not lxxviii. If someone falter the isabeau and the isabeau reseat the davon then the davon reseat the robinet. If someone reseat the claude and the claude reseat the davon then the claude falter the isabeau. If someone reseat the claude then the claude does not eat the robinet. The isabeau falter the isabeau.", "logic": "\nReseat(claude, davon)\nnot Federalize(claude, isabeau)\nFalter(isabeau, davon)\nnot Lxxviii(isabeau)\nParallel(isabeau)\nReseat(isabeau, davon)\nShellproof(robinet)\nParallel(robinet)\nnot Reseat(robinet, claude)\nnot Reseat(robinet, davon)\nnot Shellproof(davon)\nReseat(davon, claude)\nforall x (Falter(x, claude) and Reseat(claude, robinet) -> not Falter(x, robinet))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Reseat(x, claude) and not Shellproof(claude) -> not Reseat(x, robinet))\nforall x (Federalize(x, claude) -> Reseat(x, robinet))\nforall x (Reseat(x, robinet) -> not Lxxviii(robinet))\nforall x (Falter(x, isabeau) and Reseat(isabeau, davon) -> Reseat(davon, robinet))\nforall x (Reseat(x, claude) and Reseat(claude, davon) -> Falter(claude, isabeau))\nforall x (Reseat(x, claude) -> not Falter(claude, robinet))\n\nFalter(isabeau, isabeau)\n\nFalter(isabeau, isabeau) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The stanly discomfit the murdoch. The stanly does not visit the hilton. The hilton believe the murdoch. The hilton is not periodic. The hilton is pleonastic. The hilton discomfit the murdoch. The zach is willful. The zach is pleonastic. The zach does not like the stanly. The zach does not like the murdoch. The murdoch is not willful. The murdoch discomfit the stanly. If someone believe the stanly and the stanly discomfit the zach then they do not eat the zach. All untouched people are periodic. If someone discomfit the stanly and the stanly is not willful then they do not like the zach. If someone mystify the stanly then they like the zach. If someone discomfit the zach then the zach is not periodic. If someone believe the hilton and the hilton discomfit the murdoch then the murdoch discomfit the zach. If someone discomfit the stanly and the stanly discomfit the murdoch then the stanly believe the hilton. If someone discomfit the stanly then the stanly does not eat the zach. The zach is not kind.", "logic": "\nDiscomfit(stanly, murdoch)\nnot Mystify(stanly, hilton)\nBelieve(hilton, murdoch)\nnot Periodic(hilton)\nPleonastic(hilton)\nDiscomfit(hilton, murdoch)\nWillful(zach)\nPleonastic(zach)\nnot Discomfit(zach, stanly)\nnot Discomfit(zach, murdoch)\nnot Willful(murdoch)\nDiscomfit(murdoch, stanly)\nforall x (Believe(x, stanly) and Discomfit(stanly, zach) -> not Believe(x, zach))\nforall x (Untouched(x) -> Periodic(x))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, stanly) and not Willful(stanly) -> not Discomfit(x, zach))\nforall x (Mystify(x, stanly) -> Discomfit(x, zach))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, zach) -> not Periodic(zach))\nforall x (Believe(x, hilton) and Discomfit(hilton, murdoch) -> Discomfit(murdoch, zach))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, stanly) and Discomfit(stanly, murdoch) -> Believe(stanly, hilton))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, stanly) -> not Believe(stanly, zach))\n\nnot Kind(zach)\n\nnot Kind(zach) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The luciana jail the aubert. The luciana does not visit the tracy. The tracy moult the aubert. The tracy is not figurative. The tracy is parvenue. The tracy jail the aubert. The aphrodite is offending. The aphrodite is parvenue. The aphrodite does not like the luciana. The aphrodite does not like the aubert. The aubert is not offending. The aubert jail the luciana. If someone moult the luciana and the luciana jail the aphrodite then they do not eat the aphrodite. All buteonine people are figurative. If someone jail the luciana and the luciana is not offending then they do not like the aphrodite. If someone terminate the luciana then they like the aphrodite. If someone jail the aphrodite then the aphrodite is not figurative. If someone moult the tracy and the tracy jail the aubert then the aubert jail the aphrodite. If someone jail the luciana and the luciana jail the aubert then the luciana moult the tracy. If someone jail the luciana then the luciana does not eat the aphrodite. The tracy is kind.", "logic": "\nJail(luciana, aubert)\nnot Terminate(luciana, tracy)\nMoult(tracy, aubert)\nnot Figurative(tracy)\nParvenue(tracy)\nJail(tracy, aubert)\nOffending(aphrodite)\nParvenue(aphrodite)\nnot Jail(aphrodite, luciana)\nnot Jail(aphrodite, aubert)\nnot Offending(aubert)\nJail(aubert, luciana)\nforall x (Moult(x, luciana) and Jail(luciana, aphrodite) -> not Moult(x, aphrodite))\nforall x (Buteonine(x) -> Figurative(x))\nforall x (Jail(x, luciana) and not Offending(luciana) -> not Jail(x, aphrodite))\nforall x (Terminate(x, luciana) -> Jail(x, aphrodite))\nforall x (Jail(x, aphrodite) -> not Figurative(aphrodite))\nforall x (Moult(x, tracy) and Jail(tracy, aubert) -> Jail(aubert, aphrodite))\nforall x (Jail(x, luciana) and Jail(luciana, aubert) -> Moult(luciana, tracy))\nforall x (Jail(x, luciana) -> not Moult(luciana, aphrodite))\n\nKind(tracy)\n\nKind(tracy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "Mohamad is resentful. Mohamad is concise. Mohamad is limbed. Mohamad is driven. Mohamad is riemannian. Saul is resentful. Saul is masted. Saul is riemannian. Kassie is resentful. Kassie is concise. Kassie is limbed. Kassie is masted. Kassie is driven. Kassie is riemannian. Jessamine is driven. Jessamine is riemannian. If someone is riemannian then they are limbed. Green, driven people are eremitical. Red people are driven. All driven, eremitical people are limbed. All driven people are riemannian. If someone is limbed then they are eremitical. Kassie is resentful.", "logic": "\nResentful(mohamad)\nConcise(mohamad)\nLimbed(mohamad)\nDriven(mohamad)\nRiemannian(mohamad)\nResentful(saul)\nMasted(saul)\nRiemannian(saul)\nResentful(kassie)\nConcise(kassie)\nLimbed(kassie)\nMasted(kassie)\nDriven(kassie)\nRiemannian(kassie)\nDriven(jessamine)\nRiemannian(jessamine)\nforall x (Riemannian(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) and Driven(x) -> Eremitical(x))\nforall x (Eremitical(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Eremitical(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) -> Riemannian(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) -> Eremitical(x))\n\nResentful(kassie)\n\ntherefore Resentful(kassie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Casi is membranous. Casi is bony. Casi is unitarian. Casi is capital. Casi is animist. Ricky is membranous. Ricky is cashable. Ricky is animist. Luanna is membranous. Luanna is bony. Luanna is unitarian. Luanna is cashable. Luanna is capital. Luanna is animist. Becky is capital. Becky is animist. If someone is animist then they are unitarian. Green, capital people are retarded. Red people are capital. All capital, retarded people are unitarian. All capital people are animist. If someone is unitarian then they are retarded. Luanna is not capital.", "logic": "\nMembranous(casi)\nBony(casi)\nUnitarian(casi)\nCapital(casi)\nAnimist(casi)\nMembranous(ricky)\nCashable(ricky)\nAnimist(ricky)\nMembranous(luanna)\nBony(luanna)\nUnitarian(luanna)\nCashable(luanna)\nCapital(luanna)\nAnimist(luanna)\nCapital(becky)\nAnimist(becky)\nforall x (Animist(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Unitarian(x) and Capital(x) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Retarded(x) -> Capital(x))\nforall x (Capital(x) and Retarded(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Capital(x) -> Animist(x))\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Retarded(x))\n\nnot Capital(luanna)\n\ntherefore Capital(luanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Laird is unabated. Laird is slushy. Laird is scalar. Laird is dictated. Laird is funky. Adina is unabated. Adina is austenitic. Adina is funky. Fletcher is unabated. Fletcher is slushy. Fletcher is scalar. Fletcher is austenitic. Fletcher is dictated. Fletcher is funky. Dacia is dictated. Dacia is funky. If someone is funky then they are scalar. Green, dictated people are apogean. Red people are dictated. All dictated, apogean people are scalar. All dictated people are funky. If someone is scalar then they are apogean. Dacia is scalar.", "logic": "\nUnabated(laird)\nSlushy(laird)\nScalar(laird)\nDictated(laird)\nFunky(laird)\nUnabated(adina)\nAustenitic(adina)\nFunky(adina)\nUnabated(fletcher)\nSlushy(fletcher)\nScalar(fletcher)\nAustenitic(fletcher)\nDictated(fletcher)\nFunky(fletcher)\nDictated(dacia)\nFunky(dacia)\nforall x (Funky(x) -> Scalar(x))\nforall x (Scalar(x) and Dictated(x) -> Apogean(x))\nforall x (Apogean(x) -> Dictated(x))\nforall x (Dictated(x) and Apogean(x) -> Scalar(x))\nforall x (Dictated(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Scalar(x) -> Apogean(x))\n\nScalar(dacia)\n\nFunky(dacia) and forall x (Funky(x) -> Scalar(x)) -> therefore Scalar(dacia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Bidget is risque. Bidget is irregular. Bidget is thirty. Bidget is unactable. Bidget is heartless. Andrew is risque. Andrew is enchanting. Andrew is heartless. Paddie is risque. Paddie is irregular. Paddie is thirty. Paddie is enchanting. Paddie is unactable. Paddie is heartless. Pincus is unactable. Pincus is heartless. If someone is heartless then they are thirty. Green, unactable people are skillful. Red people are unactable. All unactable, skillful people are thirty. All unactable people are heartless. If someone is thirty then they are skillful. Bidget is not skillful.", "logic": "\nRisque(bidget)\nIrregular(bidget)\nThirty(bidget)\nUnactable(bidget)\nHeartless(bidget)\nRisque(andrew)\nEnchanting(andrew)\nHeartless(andrew)\nRisque(paddie)\nIrregular(paddie)\nThirty(paddie)\nEnchanting(paddie)\nUnactable(paddie)\nHeartless(paddie)\nUnactable(pincus)\nHeartless(pincus)\nforall x (Heartless(x) -> Thirty(x))\nforall x (Thirty(x) and Unactable(x) -> Skillful(x))\nforall x (Skillful(x) -> Unactable(x))\nforall x (Unactable(x) and Skillful(x) -> Thirty(x))\nforall x (Unactable(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Thirty(x) -> Skillful(x))\n\nnot Skillful(bidget)\n\nThirty(bidget) and forall x (Thirty(x) -> Skillful(x)) -> therefore Skillful(bidget)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Fernando is possessed. Fernando is sciolistic. Fernando is glace. Fernando is cherry. Fernando is prudential. Kellia is possessed. Kellia is nascent. Kellia is prudential. Sterling is possessed. Sterling is sciolistic. Sterling is glace. Sterling is nascent. Sterling is cherry. Sterling is prudential. Katinka is cherry. Katinka is prudential. If someone is prudential then they are glace. Green, cherry people are anorthitic. Red people are cherry. All cherry, anorthitic people are glace. All cherry people are prudential. If someone is glace then they are anorthitic. Katinka is anorthitic.", "logic": "\nPossessed(fernando)\nSciolistic(fernando)\nGlace(fernando)\nCherry(fernando)\nPrudential(fernando)\nPossessed(kellia)\nNascent(kellia)\nPrudential(kellia)\nPossessed(sterling)\nSciolistic(sterling)\nGlace(sterling)\nNascent(sterling)\nCherry(sterling)\nPrudential(sterling)\nCherry(katinka)\nPrudential(katinka)\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> Glace(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) and Cherry(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Cherry(x) and Anorthitic(x) -> Glace(x))\nforall x (Cherry(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\n\nAnorthitic(katinka)\n\nPrudential(katinka) and forall x (Prudential(x) -> Glace(x)) -> therefore Glace(katinka) Glace(katinka) and forall x (Glace(x) -> Anorthitic(x)) -> therefore Anorthitic(katinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Kimberli is irish. Kimberli is deductive. Kimberli is resiny. Kimberli is canine. Kimberli is unfeminine. Gerome is irish. Gerome is male. Gerome is unfeminine. Imojean is irish. Imojean is deductive. Imojean is resiny. Imojean is male. Imojean is canine. Imojean is unfeminine. Robinetta is canine. Robinetta is unfeminine. If someone is unfeminine then they are resiny. Green, canine people are acarpous. Red people are canine. All canine, acarpous people are resiny. All canine people are unfeminine. If someone is resiny then they are acarpous. Robinetta is not acarpous.", "logic": "\nIrish(kimberli)\nDeductive(kimberli)\nResiny(kimberli)\nCanine(kimberli)\nUnfeminine(kimberli)\nIrish(gerome)\nMale(gerome)\nUnfeminine(gerome)\nIrish(imojean)\nDeductive(imojean)\nResiny(imojean)\nMale(imojean)\nCanine(imojean)\nUnfeminine(imojean)\nCanine(robinetta)\nUnfeminine(robinetta)\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) and Canine(x) -> Acarpous(x))\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> Canine(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) and Acarpous(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Acarpous(x))\n\nnot Acarpous(robinetta)\n\nUnfeminine(robinetta) and forall x (Unfeminine(x) -> Resiny(x)) -> therefore Resiny(robinetta) Resiny(robinetta) and forall x (Resiny(x) -> Acarpous(x)) -> therefore Acarpous(robinetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Marchelle is cenobitic. Marchelle is positivist. Marchelle is salvific. Marchelle is neandertal. Marchelle is technical. Izzi is cenobitic. Izzi is permeative. Izzi is technical. Darci is cenobitic. Darci is positivist. Darci is salvific. Darci is permeative. Darci is neandertal. Darci is technical. Keil is neandertal. Keil is technical. If someone is technical then they are salvific. Green, neandertal people are smoking. Red people are neandertal. All neandertal, smoking people are salvific. All neandertal people are technical. If someone is salvific then they are smoking. Izzi is neandertal.", "logic": "\nCenobitic(marchelle)\nPositivist(marchelle)\nSalvific(marchelle)\nNeandertal(marchelle)\nTechnical(marchelle)\nCenobitic(izzi)\nPermeative(izzi)\nTechnical(izzi)\nCenobitic(darci)\nPositivist(darci)\nSalvific(darci)\nPermeative(darci)\nNeandertal(darci)\nTechnical(darci)\nNeandertal(keil)\nTechnical(keil)\nforall x (Technical(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Salvific(x) and Neandertal(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) -> Neandertal(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) and Smoking(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> Technical(x))\nforall x (Salvific(x) -> Smoking(x))\n\nNeandertal(izzi)\n\nTechnical(izzi) and forall x (Technical(x) -> Salvific(x)) -> therefore Salvific(izzi) Salvific(izzi) and forall x (Salvific(x) -> Smoking(x)) -> therefore Smoking(izzi) Smoking(izzi) and forall x (Smoking(x) -> Neandertal(x)) -> therefore Neandertal(izzi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Trever is primed. Trever is uphill. Trever is angelical. Trever is enlarged. Trever is riskless. Ranee is primed. Ranee is concordant. Ranee is riskless. Arlyn is primed. Arlyn is uphill. Arlyn is angelical. Arlyn is concordant. Arlyn is enlarged. Arlyn is riskless. Larisa is enlarged. Larisa is riskless. If someone is riskless then they are angelical. Green, enlarged people are admissible. Red people are enlarged. All enlarged, admissible people are angelical. All enlarged people are riskless. If someone is angelical then they are admissible. Ranee is not enlarged.", "logic": "\nPrimed(trever)\nUphill(trever)\nAngelical(trever)\nEnlarged(trever)\nRiskless(trever)\nPrimed(ranee)\nConcordant(ranee)\nRiskless(ranee)\nPrimed(arlyn)\nUphill(arlyn)\nAngelical(arlyn)\nConcordant(arlyn)\nEnlarged(arlyn)\nRiskless(arlyn)\nEnlarged(larisa)\nRiskless(larisa)\nforall x (Riskless(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Angelical(x) and Enlarged(x) -> Admissible(x))\nforall x (Admissible(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and Admissible(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Angelical(x) -> Admissible(x))\n\nnot Enlarged(ranee)\n\nRiskless(ranee) and forall x (Riskless(x) -> Angelical(x)) -> therefore Angelical(ranee) Angelical(ranee) and forall x (Angelical(x) -> Admissible(x)) -> therefore Admissible(ranee) Admissible(ranee) and forall x (Admissible(x) -> Enlarged(x)) -> therefore Enlarged(ranee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Crista is aperient. Crista is alleged. Crista is discordant. Crista is intragroup. Crista is accentual. Renae is aperient. Renae is footless. Renae is accentual. Vernor is aperient. Vernor is alleged. Vernor is discordant. Vernor is footless. Vernor is intragroup. Vernor is accentual. Kym is intragroup. Kym is accentual. If someone is accentual then they are discordant. Green, intragroup people are scowling. Red people are intragroup. All intragroup, scowling people are discordant. All intragroup people are accentual. If someone is discordant then they are scowling. Renae is not alleged.", "logic": "\nAperient(crista)\nAlleged(crista)\nDiscordant(crista)\nIntragroup(crista)\nAccentual(crista)\nAperient(renae)\nFootless(renae)\nAccentual(renae)\nAperient(vernor)\nAlleged(vernor)\nDiscordant(vernor)\nFootless(vernor)\nIntragroup(vernor)\nAccentual(vernor)\nIntragroup(kym)\nAccentual(kym)\nforall x (Accentual(x) -> Discordant(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) and Intragroup(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Intragroup(x) and Scowling(x) -> Discordant(x))\nforall x (Intragroup(x) -> Accentual(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> Scowling(x))\n\nnot Alleged(renae)\n\nnot Alleged(renae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Madison is electoral. Madison is madagascan. Madison is vapourous. Madison is unvoiced. Madison is insouciant. Westley is electoral. Westley is alto. Westley is insouciant. Julianne is electoral. Julianne is madagascan. Julianne is vapourous. Julianne is alto. Julianne is unvoiced. Julianne is insouciant. Chancey is unvoiced. Chancey is insouciant. If someone is insouciant then they are vapourous. Green, unvoiced people are gimpy. Red people are unvoiced. All unvoiced, gimpy people are vapourous. All unvoiced people are insouciant. If someone is vapourous then they are gimpy. Chancey is madagascan.", "logic": "\nElectoral(madison)\nMadagascan(madison)\nVapourous(madison)\nUnvoiced(madison)\nInsouciant(madison)\nElectoral(westley)\nAlto(westley)\nInsouciant(westley)\nElectoral(julianne)\nMadagascan(julianne)\nVapourous(julianne)\nAlto(julianne)\nUnvoiced(julianne)\nInsouciant(julianne)\nUnvoiced(chancey)\nInsouciant(chancey)\nforall x (Insouciant(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and Unvoiced(x) -> Gimpy(x))\nforall x (Gimpy(x) -> Unvoiced(x))\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) and Gimpy(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) -> Insouciant(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) -> Gimpy(x))\n\nMadagascan(chancey)\n\nMadagascan(chancey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Spud is placental. Spud is moralistic. Spud is tanzanian. Spud is opening. Spud is excursive. Joline is placental. Joline is quiescent. Joline is excursive. Arne is placental. Arne is moralistic. Arne is tanzanian. Arne is quiescent. Arne is opening. Arne is excursive. Carolyn is opening. Carolyn is excursive. If someone is excursive then they are tanzanian. Green, opening people are idolized. Red people are opening. All opening, idolized people are tanzanian. All opening people are excursive. If someone is tanzanian then they are idolized. Spud is not quiescent.", "logic": "\nPlacental(spud)\nMoralistic(spud)\nTanzanian(spud)\nOpening(spud)\nExcursive(spud)\nPlacental(joline)\nQuiescent(joline)\nExcursive(joline)\nPlacental(arne)\nMoralistic(arne)\nTanzanian(arne)\nQuiescent(arne)\nOpening(arne)\nExcursive(arne)\nOpening(carolyn)\nExcursive(carolyn)\nforall x (Excursive(x) -> Tanzanian(x))\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) and Opening(x) -> Idolized(x))\nforall x (Idolized(x) -> Opening(x))\nforall x (Opening(x) and Idolized(x) -> Tanzanian(x))\nforall x (Opening(x) -> Excursive(x))\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) -> Idolized(x))\n\nnot Quiescent(spud)\n\nnot Quiescent(spud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Dietrich is abactinal. Dietrich is timorous. Dietrich is quickset. Dietrich is overfed. Dietrich is refulgent. Sacha is abactinal. Sacha is respondent. Sacha is refulgent. Milton is abactinal. Milton is timorous. Milton is quickset. Milton is respondent. Milton is overfed. Milton is refulgent. Joelle is overfed. Joelle is refulgent. If someone is refulgent then they are quickset. Green, overfed people are bilabiate. Red people are overfed. All overfed, bilabiate people are quickset. All overfed people are refulgent. If someone is quickset then they are bilabiate. Joelle is abactinal.", "logic": "\nAbactinal(dietrich)\nTimorous(dietrich)\nQuickset(dietrich)\nOverfed(dietrich)\nRefulgent(dietrich)\nAbactinal(sacha)\nRespondent(sacha)\nRefulgent(sacha)\nAbactinal(milton)\nTimorous(milton)\nQuickset(milton)\nRespondent(milton)\nOverfed(milton)\nRefulgent(milton)\nOverfed(joelle)\nRefulgent(joelle)\nforall x (Refulgent(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Quickset(x) and Overfed(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Overfed(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) and Bilabiate(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) -> Refulgent(x))\nforall x (Quickset(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\n\nAbactinal(joelle)\n\nAbactinal(joelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Andreas is impeded. If someone is combatant and molal then they are scoured. If someone is combatant and impeded then they are molal. If someone is impeded then they are combatant. Andreas is impeded.", "logic": "\nImpeded(andreas)\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Molal(x) -> Scoured(x))\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Impeded(x) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Impeded(x) -> Combatant(x))\n\nImpeded(andreas)\n\ntherefore Impeded(andreas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Basil is accumbent. If someone is brattish and gaping then they are platelike. If someone is brattish and accumbent then they are gaping. If someone is accumbent then they are brattish. Basil is not accumbent.", "logic": "\nAccumbent(basil)\nforall x (Brattish(x) and Gaping(x) -> Platelike(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) and Accumbent(x) -> Gaping(x))\nforall x (Accumbent(x) -> Brattish(x))\n\nnot Accumbent(basil)\n\ntherefore Accumbent(basil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Shane is fleshly. If someone is lowly and gingerly then they are imported. If someone is lowly and fleshly then they are gingerly. If someone is fleshly then they are lowly. Shane is lowly.", "logic": "\nFleshly(shane)\nforall x (Lowly(x) and Gingerly(x) -> Imported(x))\nforall x (Lowly(x) and Fleshly(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) -> Lowly(x))\n\nLowly(shane)\n\nFleshly(shane) and forall x (Fleshly(x) -> Lowly(x)) -> therefore Lowly(shane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Kimmie is lifeless. If someone is grating and oligarchic then they are undecided. If someone is grating and lifeless then they are oligarchic. If someone is lifeless then they are grating. Kimmie is not grating.", "logic": "\nLifeless(kimmie)\nforall x (Grating(x) and Oligarchic(x) -> Undecided(x))\nforall x (Grating(x) and Lifeless(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\nforall x (Lifeless(x) -> Grating(x))\n\nnot Grating(kimmie)\n\nLifeless(kimmie) and forall x (Lifeless(x) -> Grating(x)) -> therefore Grating(kimmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Tucker is polynesian. If someone is brushlike and projectile then they are vestiary. If someone is brushlike and polynesian then they are projectile. If someone is polynesian then they are brushlike. Tucker is projectile.", "logic": "\nPolynesian(tucker)\nforall x (Brushlike(x) and Projectile(x) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Brushlike(x) and Polynesian(x) -> Projectile(x))\nforall x (Polynesian(x) -> Brushlike(x))\n\nProjectile(tucker)\n\nPolynesian(tucker) and forall x (Polynesian(x) -> Brushlike(x)) -> therefore Brushlike(tucker) Brushlike(tucker) and Polynesian(tucker) and forall x (Brushlike(x) and Polynesian(x) -> Projectile(x)) -> therefore Projectile(tucker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Agamemnon is rummy. If someone is arenaceous and sculpted then they are punk. If someone is arenaceous and rummy then they are sculpted. If someone is rummy then they are arenaceous. Agamemnon is not sculpted.", "logic": "\nRummy(agamemnon)\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) and Sculpted(x) -> Punk(x))\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) and Rummy(x) -> Sculpted(x))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\n\nnot Sculpted(agamemnon)\n\nRummy(agamemnon) and forall x (Rummy(x) -> Arenaceous(x)) -> therefore Arenaceous(agamemnon) Arenaceous(agamemnon) and Rummy(agamemnon) and forall x (Arenaceous(x) and Rummy(x) -> Sculpted(x)) -> therefore Sculpted(agamemnon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Angus is baking. If someone is sugared and homologic then they are abnormal. If someone is sugared and baking then they are homologic. If someone is baking then they are sugared. Angus is abnormal.", "logic": "\nBaking(angus)\nforall x (Sugared(x) and Homologic(x) -> Abnormal(x))\nforall x (Sugared(x) and Baking(x) -> Homologic(x))\nforall x (Baking(x) -> Sugared(x))\n\nAbnormal(angus)\n\nBaking(angus) and forall x (Baking(x) -> Sugared(x)) -> therefore Sugared(angus) Baking(angus) and forall x (Baking(x) -> Sugared(x)) -> therefore Sugared(angus) Sugared(angus) and Baking(angus) and forall x (Sugared(x) and Baking(x) -> Homologic(x)) -> therefore Homologic(angus) Sugared(angus) and Homologic(angus) and forall x (Sugared(x) and Homologic(x) -> Abnormal(x)) -> therefore Abnormal(angus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Nerti is bountied. If someone is chelate and regenerate then they are unsaid. If someone is chelate and bountied then they are regenerate. If someone is bountied then they are chelate. Nerti is not unsaid.", "logic": "\nBountied(nerti)\nforall x (Chelate(x) and Regenerate(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x) and Bountied(x) -> Regenerate(x))\nforall x (Bountied(x) -> Chelate(x))\n\nnot Unsaid(nerti)\n\nBountied(nerti) and forall x (Bountied(x) -> Chelate(x)) -> therefore Chelate(nerti) Bountied(nerti) and forall x (Bountied(x) -> Chelate(x)) -> therefore Chelate(nerti) Chelate(nerti) and Bountied(nerti) and forall x (Chelate(x) and Bountied(x) -> Regenerate(x)) -> therefore Regenerate(nerti) Chelate(nerti) and Regenerate(nerti) and forall x (Chelate(x) and Regenerate(x) -> Unsaid(x)) -> therefore Unsaid(nerti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Judi is nonkosher. If someone is unworthy and somatic then they are iridic. If someone is unworthy and nonkosher then they are somatic. If someone is nonkosher then they are unworthy. Judi is not quiet.", "logic": "\nNonkosher(judi)\nforall x (Unworthy(x) and Somatic(x) -> Iridic(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) and Nonkosher(x) -> Somatic(x))\nforall x (Nonkosher(x) -> Unworthy(x))\n\nnot Quiet(judi)\n\nnot Quiet(judi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Blair is asynergic. If someone is xxxviii and outrigged then they are hegelian. If someone is xxxviii and asynergic then they are outrigged. If someone is asynergic then they are xxxviii. Blair is cold.", "logic": "\nAsynergic(blair)\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) and Outrigged(x) -> Hegelian(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) and Asynergic(x) -> Outrigged(x))\nforall x (Asynergic(x) -> Xxxviii(x))\n\nCold(blair)\n\nCold(blair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "The mitchael does not visit the stacia. The othello inspan the eric. The eric perturb the mitchael. The stacia sizzle the othello. If the eric inspan the othello and the othello sizzle the mitchael then the eric does not see the mitchael. If someone is eleven then they need the othello. If someone inspan the stacia then they see the eric. If someone perturb the othello and they need the eric then they do not see the eric. If someone perturb the mitchael then they see the eric. If someone sizzle the eric then the eric is eleven. If someone is eleven then they visit the stacia. If someone is foreboding and they see the stacia then the stacia inspan the eric. The stacia sizzle the othello.", "logic": "\nnot Perturb(mitchael, stacia)\nInspan(othello, eric)\nPerturb(eric, mitchael)\nSizzle(stacia, othello)\nInspan(eric, othello) and Sizzle(othello, mitchael) -> not Sizzle(eric, mitchael)\nforall x (Eleven(x) -> Inspan(x, othello))\nforall x (Inspan(x, stacia) -> Sizzle(x, eric))\nforall x (Perturb(x, othello) and Inspan(x, eric) -> not Sizzle(x, eric))\nforall x (Perturb(x, mitchael) -> Sizzle(x, eric))\nforall x (Sizzle(x, eric) -> Eleven(eric))\nforall x (Eleven(x) -> Perturb(x, stacia))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) and Sizzle(x, stacia) -> Inspan(stacia, eric))\n\nSizzle(stacia, othello)\n\ntherefore Sizzle(stacia, othello)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The byron does not visit the fredia. The mikel demoralise the renard. The renard confine the byron. The fredia cloy the mikel. If the renard demoralise the mikel and the mikel cloy the byron then the renard does not see the byron. If someone is beefy then they need the mikel. If someone demoralise the fredia then they see the renard. If someone confine the mikel and they need the renard then they do not see the renard. If someone confine the byron then they see the renard. If someone cloy the renard then the renard is beefy. If someone is beefy then they visit the fredia. If someone is hominian and they see the fredia then the fredia demoralise the renard. The fredia does not see the mikel.", "logic": "\nnot Confine(byron, fredia)\nDemoralise(mikel, renard)\nConfine(renard, byron)\nCloy(fredia, mikel)\nDemoralise(renard, mikel) and Cloy(mikel, byron) -> not Cloy(renard, byron)\nforall x (Beefy(x) -> Demoralise(x, mikel))\nforall x (Demoralise(x, fredia) -> Cloy(x, renard))\nforall x (Confine(x, mikel) and Demoralise(x, renard) -> not Cloy(x, renard))\nforall x (Confine(x, byron) -> Cloy(x, renard))\nforall x (Cloy(x, renard) -> Beefy(renard))\nforall x (Beefy(x) -> Confine(x, fredia))\nforall x (Hominian(x) and Cloy(x, fredia) -> Demoralise(fredia, renard))\n\nnot Cloy(fredia, mikel)\n\ntherefore Cloy(fredia, mikel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The geri does not visit the donella. The arlo slop the lorrie. The lorrie tinker the geri. The donella decalcify the arlo. If the lorrie slop the arlo and the arlo decalcify the geri then the lorrie does not see the geri. If someone is prim then they need the arlo. If someone slop the donella then they see the lorrie. If someone tinker the arlo and they need the lorrie then they do not see the lorrie. If someone tinker the geri then they see the lorrie. If someone decalcify the lorrie then the lorrie is prim. If someone is prim then they visit the donella. If someone is patchy and they see the donella then the donella slop the lorrie. The lorrie decalcify the lorrie.", "logic": "\nnot Tinker(geri, donella)\nSlop(arlo, lorrie)\nTinker(lorrie, geri)\nDecalcify(donella, arlo)\nSlop(lorrie, arlo) and Decalcify(arlo, geri) -> not Decalcify(lorrie, geri)\nforall x (Prim(x) -> Slop(x, arlo))\nforall x (Slop(x, donella) -> Decalcify(x, lorrie))\nforall x (Tinker(x, arlo) and Slop(x, lorrie) -> not Decalcify(x, lorrie))\nforall x (Tinker(x, geri) -> Decalcify(x, lorrie))\nforall x (Decalcify(x, lorrie) -> Prim(lorrie))\nforall x (Prim(x) -> Tinker(x, donella))\nforall x (Patchy(x) and Decalcify(x, donella) -> Slop(donella, lorrie))\n\nDecalcify(lorrie, lorrie)\n\nTinker(lorrie, geri) and forall x (Tinker(x, geri) -> Decalcify(x, lorrie)) -> therefore Decalcify(lorrie, lorrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The brita does not visit the ciara. The catrina limp the merilyn. The merilyn flock the brita. The ciara captain the catrina. If the merilyn limp the catrina and the catrina captain the brita then the merilyn does not see the brita. If someone is flat then they need the catrina. If someone limp the ciara then they see the merilyn. If someone flock the catrina and they need the merilyn then they do not see the merilyn. If someone flock the brita then they see the merilyn. If someone captain the merilyn then the merilyn is flat. If someone is flat then they visit the ciara. If someone is zonal and they see the ciara then the ciara limp the merilyn. The merilyn does not see the merilyn.", "logic": "\nnot Flock(brita, ciara)\nLimp(catrina, merilyn)\nFlock(merilyn, brita)\nCaptain(ciara, catrina)\nLimp(merilyn, catrina) and Captain(catrina, brita) -> not Captain(merilyn, brita)\nforall x (Flat(x) -> Limp(x, catrina))\nforall x (Limp(x, ciara) -> Captain(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Flock(x, catrina) and Limp(x, merilyn) -> not Captain(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Flock(x, brita) -> Captain(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Captain(x, merilyn) -> Flat(merilyn))\nforall x (Flat(x) -> Flock(x, ciara))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Captain(x, ciara) -> Limp(ciara, merilyn))\n\nnot Captain(merilyn, merilyn)\n\nFlock(merilyn, brita) and forall x (Flock(x, brita) -> Captain(x, merilyn)) -> therefore Captain(merilyn, merilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The fan does not visit the ahmet. The gladis prick the arlena. The arlena unloosen the fan. The ahmet trice the gladis. If the arlena prick the gladis and the gladis trice the fan then the arlena does not see the fan. If someone is communal then they need the gladis. If someone prick the ahmet then they see the arlena. If someone unloosen the gladis and they need the arlena then they do not see the arlena. If someone unloosen the fan then they see the arlena. If someone trice the arlena then the arlena is communal. If someone is communal then they visit the ahmet. If someone is feisty and they see the ahmet then the ahmet prick the arlena. The arlena is communal.", "logic": "\nnot Unloosen(fan, ahmet)\nPrick(gladis, arlena)\nUnloosen(arlena, fan)\nTrice(ahmet, gladis)\nPrick(arlena, gladis) and Trice(gladis, fan) -> not Trice(arlena, fan)\nforall x (Communal(x) -> Prick(x, gladis))\nforall x (Prick(x, ahmet) -> Trice(x, arlena))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, gladis) and Prick(x, arlena) -> not Trice(x, arlena))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, fan) -> Trice(x, arlena))\nforall x (Trice(x, arlena) -> Communal(arlena))\nforall x (Communal(x) -> Unloosen(x, ahmet))\nforall x (Feisty(x) and Trice(x, ahmet) -> Prick(ahmet, arlena))\n\nCommunal(arlena)\n\nUnloosen(arlena, fan) and forall x (Unloosen(x, fan) -> Trice(x, arlena)) -> therefore Trice(arlena, arlena) Trice(arlena, arlena) and forall x (Trice(x, arlena) -> Communal(arlena)) -> therefore Communal(arlena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The winslow does not visit the rayna. The greta yank the janean. The janean tittivate the winslow. The rayna ruggedise the greta. If the janean yank the greta and the greta ruggedise the winslow then the janean does not see the winslow. If someone is antacid then they need the greta. If someone yank the rayna then they see the janean. If someone tittivate the greta and they need the janean then they do not see the janean. If someone tittivate the winslow then they see the janean. If someone ruggedise the janean then the janean is antacid. If someone is antacid then they visit the rayna. If someone is outclassed and they see the rayna then the rayna yank the janean. The janean is not antacid.", "logic": "\nnot Tittivate(winslow, rayna)\nYank(greta, janean)\nTittivate(janean, winslow)\nRuggedise(rayna, greta)\nYank(janean, greta) and Ruggedise(greta, winslow) -> not Ruggedise(janean, winslow)\nforall x (Antacid(x) -> Yank(x, greta))\nforall x (Yank(x, rayna) -> Ruggedise(x, janean))\nforall x (Tittivate(x, greta) and Yank(x, janean) -> not Ruggedise(x, janean))\nforall x (Tittivate(x, winslow) -> Ruggedise(x, janean))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, janean) -> Antacid(janean))\nforall x (Antacid(x) -> Tittivate(x, rayna))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) and Ruggedise(x, rayna) -> Yank(rayna, janean))\n\nnot Antacid(janean)\n\nTittivate(janean, winslow) and forall x (Tittivate(x, winslow) -> Ruggedise(x, janean)) -> therefore Ruggedise(janean, janean) Ruggedise(janean, janean) and forall x (Ruggedise(x, janean) -> Antacid(janean)) -> therefore Antacid(janean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The ronnie does not visit the celle. The eben puree the gibb. The gibb cypher the ronnie. The celle enwrap the eben. If the gibb puree the eben and the eben enwrap the ronnie then the gibb does not see the ronnie. If someone is talented then they need the eben. If someone puree the celle then they see the gibb. If someone cypher the eben and they need the gibb then they do not see the gibb. If someone cypher the ronnie then they see the gibb. If someone enwrap the gibb then the gibb is talented. If someone is talented then they visit the celle. If someone is starboard and they see the celle then the celle puree the gibb. The gibb puree the eben.", "logic": "\nnot Cypher(ronnie, celle)\nPuree(eben, gibb)\nCypher(gibb, ronnie)\nEnwrap(celle, eben)\nPuree(gibb, eben) and Enwrap(eben, ronnie) -> not Enwrap(gibb, ronnie)\nforall x (Talented(x) -> Puree(x, eben))\nforall x (Puree(x, celle) -> Enwrap(x, gibb))\nforall x (Cypher(x, eben) and Puree(x, gibb) -> not Enwrap(x, gibb))\nforall x (Cypher(x, ronnie) -> Enwrap(x, gibb))\nforall x (Enwrap(x, gibb) -> Talented(gibb))\nforall x (Talented(x) -> Cypher(x, celle))\nforall x (Starboard(x) and Enwrap(x, celle) -> Puree(celle, gibb))\n\nPuree(gibb, eben)\n\nCypher(gibb, ronnie) and forall x (Cypher(x, ronnie) -> Enwrap(x, gibb)) -> therefore Enwrap(gibb, gibb) Enwrap(gibb, gibb) and forall x (Enwrap(x, gibb) -> Talented(gibb)) -> therefore Talented(gibb) Talented(gibb) and forall x (Talented(x) -> Puree(x, eben)) -> therefore Puree(gibb, eben)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The ruthe does not visit the evette. The clair resume the loralie. The loralie proffer the ruthe. The evette boss the clair. If the loralie resume the clair and the clair boss the ruthe then the loralie does not see the ruthe. If someone is unkind then they need the clair. If someone resume the evette then they see the loralie. If someone proffer the clair and they need the loralie then they do not see the loralie. If someone proffer the ruthe then they see the loralie. If someone boss the loralie then the loralie is unkind. If someone is unkind then they visit the evette. If someone is blooded and they see the evette then the evette resume the loralie. The loralie does not need the clair.", "logic": "\nnot Proffer(ruthe, evette)\nResume(clair, loralie)\nProffer(loralie, ruthe)\nBoss(evette, clair)\nResume(loralie, clair) and Boss(clair, ruthe) -> not Boss(loralie, ruthe)\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Resume(x, clair))\nforall x (Resume(x, evette) -> Boss(x, loralie))\nforall x (Proffer(x, clair) and Resume(x, loralie) -> not Boss(x, loralie))\nforall x (Proffer(x, ruthe) -> Boss(x, loralie))\nforall x (Boss(x, loralie) -> Unkind(loralie))\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Proffer(x, evette))\nforall x (Blooded(x) and Boss(x, evette) -> Resume(evette, loralie))\n\nnot Resume(loralie, clair)\n\nProffer(loralie, ruthe) and forall x (Proffer(x, ruthe) -> Boss(x, loralie)) -> therefore Boss(loralie, loralie) Boss(loralie, loralie) and forall x (Boss(x, loralie) -> Unkind(loralie)) -> therefore Unkind(loralie) Unkind(loralie) and forall x (Unkind(x) -> Resume(x, clair)) -> therefore Resume(loralie, clair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The lucie does not visit the smitty. The desaree stagnate the paul. The paul bioassay the lucie. The smitty putrefy the desaree. If the paul stagnate the desaree and the desaree putrefy the lucie then the paul does not see the lucie. If someone is ahead then they need the desaree. If someone stagnate the smitty then they see the paul. If someone bioassay the desaree and they need the paul then they do not see the paul. If someone bioassay the lucie then they see the paul. If someone putrefy the paul then the paul is ahead. If someone is ahead then they visit the smitty. If someone is unsoiled and they see the smitty then the smitty stagnate the paul. The lucie does not need the desaree.", "logic": "\nnot Bioassay(lucie, smitty)\nStagnate(desaree, paul)\nBioassay(paul, lucie)\nPutrefy(smitty, desaree)\nStagnate(paul, desaree) and Putrefy(desaree, lucie) -> not Putrefy(paul, lucie)\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> Stagnate(x, desaree))\nforall x (Stagnate(x, smitty) -> Putrefy(x, paul))\nforall x (Bioassay(x, desaree) and Stagnate(x, paul) -> not Putrefy(x, paul))\nforall x (Bioassay(x, lucie) -> Putrefy(x, paul))\nforall x (Putrefy(x, paul) -> Ahead(paul))\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> Bioassay(x, smitty))\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) and Putrefy(x, smitty) -> Stagnate(smitty, paul))\n\nnot Stagnate(lucie, desaree)\n\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> Stagnate(x, desaree)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The parrnell does not visit the silvana. The conrad recover the gabey. The gabey burglarize the parrnell. The silvana clump the conrad. If the gabey recover the conrad and the conrad clump the parrnell then the gabey does not see the parrnell. If someone is sleeved then they need the conrad. If someone recover the silvana then they see the gabey. If someone burglarize the conrad and they need the gabey then they do not see the gabey. If someone burglarize the parrnell then they see the gabey. If someone clump the gabey then the gabey is sleeved. If someone is sleeved then they visit the silvana. If someone is unworthy and they see the silvana then the silvana recover the gabey. The silvana clump the gabey.", "logic": "\nnot Burglarize(parrnell, silvana)\nRecover(conrad, gabey)\nBurglarize(gabey, parrnell)\nClump(silvana, conrad)\nRecover(gabey, conrad) and Clump(conrad, parrnell) -> not Clump(gabey, parrnell)\nforall x (Sleeved(x) -> Recover(x, conrad))\nforall x (Recover(x, silvana) -> Clump(x, gabey))\nforall x (Burglarize(x, conrad) and Recover(x, gabey) -> not Clump(x, gabey))\nforall x (Burglarize(x, parrnell) -> Clump(x, gabey))\nforall x (Clump(x, gabey) -> Sleeved(gabey))\nforall x (Sleeved(x) -> Burglarize(x, silvana))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) and Clump(x, silvana) -> Recover(silvana, gabey))\n\nClump(silvana, gabey)\n\nforall x (Recover(x, silvana) -> Clump(x, gabey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The andie does not visit the leeanne. The jemima bisect the agnese. The agnese blight the andie. The leeanne curtain the jemima. If the agnese bisect the jemima and the jemima curtain the andie then the agnese does not see the andie. If someone is articulary then they need the jemima. If someone bisect the leeanne then they see the agnese. If someone blight the jemima and they need the agnese then they do not see the agnese. If someone blight the andie then they see the agnese. If someone curtain the agnese then the agnese is articulary. If someone is articulary then they visit the leeanne. If someone is ascetical and they see the leeanne then the leeanne bisect the agnese. The leeanne does not need the agnese.", "logic": "\nnot Blight(andie, leeanne)\nBisect(jemima, agnese)\nBlight(agnese, andie)\nCurtain(leeanne, jemima)\nBisect(agnese, jemima) and Curtain(jemima, andie) -> not Curtain(agnese, andie)\nforall x (Articulary(x) -> Bisect(x, jemima))\nforall x (Bisect(x, leeanne) -> Curtain(x, agnese))\nforall x (Blight(x, jemima) and Bisect(x, agnese) -> not Curtain(x, agnese))\nforall x (Blight(x, andie) -> Curtain(x, agnese))\nforall x (Curtain(x, agnese) -> Articulary(agnese))\nforall x (Articulary(x) -> Blight(x, leeanne))\nforall x (Ascetical(x) and Curtain(x, leeanne) -> Bisect(leeanne, agnese))\n\nnot Bisect(leeanne, agnese)\n\nforall x (Ascetical(x) and Curtain(x, leeanne) -> Bisect(leeanne, agnese)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The courtenay does not visit the alexandra. The rivi bunch the aggi. The aggi cane the courtenay. The alexandra grave the rivi. If the aggi bunch the rivi and the rivi grave the courtenay then the aggi does not see the courtenay. If someone is disliked then they need the rivi. If someone bunch the alexandra then they see the aggi. If someone cane the rivi and they need the aggi then they do not see the aggi. If someone cane the courtenay then they see the aggi. If someone grave the aggi then the aggi is disliked. If someone is disliked then they visit the alexandra. If someone is handsewn and they see the alexandra then the alexandra bunch the aggi. The rivi cane the alexandra.", "logic": "\nnot Cane(courtenay, alexandra)\nBunch(rivi, aggi)\nCane(aggi, courtenay)\nGrave(alexandra, rivi)\nBunch(aggi, rivi) and Grave(rivi, courtenay) -> not Grave(aggi, courtenay)\nforall x (Disliked(x) -> Bunch(x, rivi))\nforall x (Bunch(x, alexandra) -> Grave(x, aggi))\nforall x (Cane(x, rivi) and Bunch(x, aggi) -> not Grave(x, aggi))\nforall x (Cane(x, courtenay) -> Grave(x, aggi))\nforall x (Grave(x, aggi) -> Disliked(aggi))\nforall x (Disliked(x) -> Cane(x, alexandra))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) and Grave(x, alexandra) -> Bunch(alexandra, aggi))\n\nCane(rivi, alexandra)\n\nforall x (Disliked(x) -> Cane(x, alexandra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The ricardo does not visit the jenica. The marylee hose the maury. The maury slander the ricardo. The jenica mime the marylee. If the maury hose the marylee and the marylee mime the ricardo then the maury does not see the ricardo. If someone is anodyne then they need the marylee. If someone hose the jenica then they see the maury. If someone slander the marylee and they need the maury then they do not see the maury. If someone slander the ricardo then they see the maury. If someone mime the maury then the maury is anodyne. If someone is anodyne then they visit the jenica. If someone is softened and they see the jenica then the jenica hose the maury. The marylee is not softened.", "logic": "\nnot Slander(ricardo, jenica)\nHose(marylee, maury)\nSlander(maury, ricardo)\nMime(jenica, marylee)\nHose(maury, marylee) and Mime(marylee, ricardo) -> not Mime(maury, ricardo)\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Hose(x, marylee))\nforall x (Hose(x, jenica) -> Mime(x, maury))\nforall x (Slander(x, marylee) and Hose(x, maury) -> not Mime(x, maury))\nforall x (Slander(x, ricardo) -> Mime(x, maury))\nforall x (Mime(x, maury) -> Anodyne(maury))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Slander(x, jenica))\nforall x (Softened(x) and Mime(x, jenica) -> Hose(jenica, maury))\n\nnot Softened(marylee)\n\nnot Softened(marylee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The amelita does not visit the aurore. The hulda platinize the maury. The maury gormandize the amelita. The aurore dictate the hulda. If the maury platinize the hulda and the hulda dictate the amelita then the maury does not see the amelita. If someone is germicidal then they need the hulda. If someone platinize the aurore then they see the maury. If someone gormandize the hulda and they need the maury then they do not see the maury. If someone gormandize the amelita then they see the maury. If someone dictate the maury then the maury is germicidal. If someone is germicidal then they visit the aurore. If someone is uncolored and they see the aurore then the aurore platinize the maury. The hulda gormandize the hulda.", "logic": "\nnot Gormandize(amelita, aurore)\nPlatinize(hulda, maury)\nGormandize(maury, amelita)\nDictate(aurore, hulda)\nPlatinize(maury, hulda) and Dictate(hulda, amelita) -> not Dictate(maury, amelita)\nforall x (Germicidal(x) -> Platinize(x, hulda))\nforall x (Platinize(x, aurore) -> Dictate(x, maury))\nforall x (Gormandize(x, hulda) and Platinize(x, maury) -> not Dictate(x, maury))\nforall x (Gormandize(x, amelita) -> Dictate(x, maury))\nforall x (Dictate(x, maury) -> Germicidal(maury))\nforall x (Germicidal(x) -> Gormandize(x, aurore))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and Dictate(x, aurore) -> Platinize(aurore, maury))\n\nGormandize(hulda, hulda)\n\nGormandize(hulda, hulda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The dorolisa does not visit the merrilee. The ernesto hope the torrie. The torrie displease the dorolisa. The merrilee clap the ernesto. If the torrie hope the ernesto and the ernesto clap the dorolisa then the torrie does not see the dorolisa. If someone is unsleeping then they need the ernesto. If someone hope the merrilee then they see the torrie. If someone displease the ernesto and they need the torrie then they do not see the torrie. If someone displease the dorolisa then they see the torrie. If someone clap the torrie then the torrie is unsleeping. If someone is unsleeping then they visit the merrilee. If someone is cragged and they see the merrilee then the merrilee hope the torrie. The dorolisa is not unsleeping.", "logic": "\nnot Displease(dorolisa, merrilee)\nHope(ernesto, torrie)\nDisplease(torrie, dorolisa)\nClap(merrilee, ernesto)\nHope(torrie, ernesto) and Clap(ernesto, dorolisa) -> not Clap(torrie, dorolisa)\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) -> Hope(x, ernesto))\nforall x (Hope(x, merrilee) -> Clap(x, torrie))\nforall x (Displease(x, ernesto) and Hope(x, torrie) -> not Clap(x, torrie))\nforall x (Displease(x, dorolisa) -> Clap(x, torrie))\nforall x (Clap(x, torrie) -> Unsleeping(torrie))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) -> Displease(x, merrilee))\nforall x (Cragged(x) and Clap(x, merrilee) -> Hope(merrilee, torrie))\n\nnot Unsleeping(dorolisa)\n\nnot Unsleeping(dorolisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The benedicta does not visit the joscelin. The ronny consign the hadley. The hadley immix the benedicta. The joscelin wade the ronny. If the hadley consign the ronny and the ronny wade the benedicta then the hadley does not see the benedicta. If someone is bavarian then they need the ronny. If someone consign the joscelin then they see the hadley. If someone immix the ronny and they need the hadley then they do not see the hadley. If someone immix the benedicta then they see the hadley. If someone wade the hadley then the hadley is bavarian. If someone is bavarian then they visit the joscelin. If someone is skilful and they see the joscelin then the joscelin consign the hadley. The hadley consign the hadley.", "logic": "\nnot Immix(benedicta, joscelin)\nConsign(ronny, hadley)\nImmix(hadley, benedicta)\nWade(joscelin, ronny)\nConsign(hadley, ronny) and Wade(ronny, benedicta) -> not Wade(hadley, benedicta)\nforall x (Bavarian(x) -> Consign(x, ronny))\nforall x (Consign(x, joscelin) -> Wade(x, hadley))\nforall x (Immix(x, ronny) and Consign(x, hadley) -> not Wade(x, hadley))\nforall x (Immix(x, benedicta) -> Wade(x, hadley))\nforall x (Wade(x, hadley) -> Bavarian(hadley))\nforall x (Bavarian(x) -> Immix(x, joscelin))\nforall x (Skilful(x) and Wade(x, joscelin) -> Consign(joscelin, hadley))\n\nConsign(hadley, hadley)\n\nConsign(hadley, hadley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "Andria is triumphant. Ardeen is not lost. Gilly is triumphant. If something is jarring then it is triumphant. If something is exigent and not lost then it is decollete. If something is gallican then it is decollete. Quiet things are gallican. All lost, gallican things are exigent. All lost things are exigent. Big, jarring things are exigent. If Andria is decollete and Andria is gallican then Andria is not jarring. Andria is triumphant.", "logic": "\nTriumphant(andria)\nnot Lost(ardeen)\nTriumphant(gilly)\nforall x (Jarring(x) -> Triumphant(x))\nforall x (Exigent(x) and not Lost(x) -> Decollete(x))\nforall x (Gallican(x) -> Decollete(x))\nforall x (Triumphant(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) and Gallican(x) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) and Jarring(x) -> Exigent(x))\nDecollete(andria) and Gallican(andria) -> not Jarring(andria)\n\nTriumphant(andria)\n\ntherefore Triumphant(andria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Nick is harried. Alison is not crispate. Selene is harried. If something is semiotic then it is harried. If something is dastardly and not crispate then it is adored. If something is hypnotized then it is adored. Quiet things are hypnotized. All crispate, hypnotized things are dastardly. All crispate things are dastardly. Big, semiotic things are dastardly. If Nick is adored and Nick is hypnotized then Nick is not semiotic. Selene is not harried.", "logic": "\nHarried(nick)\nnot Crispate(alison)\nHarried(selene)\nforall x (Semiotic(x) -> Harried(x))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) and not Crispate(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Hypnotized(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) and Hypnotized(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) and Semiotic(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nAdored(nick) and Hypnotized(nick) -> not Semiotic(nick)\n\nnot Harried(selene)\n\ntherefore Harried(selene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Katey is puerperal. Helaine is not admonitory. Cesya is puerperal. If something is pledged then it is puerperal. If something is stretch and not admonitory then it is imprisoned. If something is passionate then it is imprisoned. Quiet things are passionate. All admonitory, passionate things are stretch. All admonitory things are stretch. Big, pledged things are stretch. If Katey is imprisoned and Katey is passionate then Katey is not pledged. Katey is passionate.", "logic": "\nPuerperal(katey)\nnot Admonitory(helaine)\nPuerperal(cesya)\nforall x (Pledged(x) -> Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Stretch(x) and not Admonitory(x) -> Imprisoned(x))\nforall x (Passionate(x) -> Imprisoned(x))\nforall x (Puerperal(x) -> Passionate(x))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) and Passionate(x) -> Stretch(x))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) -> Stretch(x))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) and Pledged(x) -> Stretch(x))\nImprisoned(katey) and Passionate(katey) -> not Pledged(katey)\n\nPassionate(katey)\n\nPuerperal(katey) and forall x (Puerperal(x) -> Passionate(x)) -> therefore Passionate(katey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Desaree is slow. Grazia is not serial. Harold is slow. If something is wrongful then it is slow. If something is squint and not serial then it is demagogic. If something is cherubic then it is demagogic. Quiet things are cherubic. All serial, cherubic things are squint. All serial things are squint. Big, wrongful things are squint. If Desaree is demagogic and Desaree is cherubic then Desaree is not wrongful. Desaree is not cherubic.", "logic": "\nSlow(desaree)\nnot Serial(grazia)\nSlow(harold)\nforall x (Wrongful(x) -> Slow(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) and not Serial(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Slow(x) -> Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Serial(x) and Cherubic(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Serial(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Serial(x) and Wrongful(x) -> Squint(x))\nDemagogic(desaree) and Cherubic(desaree) -> not Wrongful(desaree)\n\nnot Cherubic(desaree)\n\nSlow(desaree) and forall x (Slow(x) -> Cherubic(x)) -> therefore Cherubic(desaree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Melinde is heritable. Amara is not andante. Tamiko is heritable. If something is ungrateful then it is heritable. If something is occult and not andante then it is supportive. If something is downy then it is supportive. Quiet things are downy. All andante, downy things are occult. All andante things are occult. Big, ungrateful things are occult. If Melinde is supportive and Melinde is downy then Melinde is not ungrateful. Tamiko is supportive.", "logic": "\nHeritable(melinde)\nnot Andante(amara)\nHeritable(tamiko)\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Heritable(x))\nforall x (Occult(x) and not Andante(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Heritable(x) -> Downy(x))\nforall x (Andante(x) and Downy(x) -> Occult(x))\nforall x (Andante(x) -> Occult(x))\nforall x (Andante(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> Occult(x))\nSupportive(melinde) and Downy(melinde) -> not Ungrateful(melinde)\n\nSupportive(tamiko)\n\nHeritable(tamiko) and forall x (Heritable(x) -> Downy(x)) -> therefore Downy(tamiko) Downy(tamiko) and forall x (Downy(x) -> Supportive(x)) -> therefore Supportive(tamiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Jedediah is allophonic. Nico is not migratory. Eduardo is allophonic. If something is unknowable then it is allophonic. If something is tops and not migratory then it is achromatic. If something is billed then it is achromatic. Quiet things are billed. All migratory, billed things are tops. All migratory things are tops. Big, unknowable things are tops. If Jedediah is achromatic and Jedediah is billed then Jedediah is not unknowable. Eduardo is not achromatic.", "logic": "\nAllophonic(jedediah)\nnot Migratory(nico)\nAllophonic(eduardo)\nforall x (Unknowable(x) -> Allophonic(x))\nforall x (Tops(x) and not Migratory(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) -> Billed(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Billed(x) -> Tops(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) -> Tops(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Tops(x))\nAchromatic(jedediah) and Billed(jedediah) -> not Unknowable(jedediah)\n\nnot Achromatic(eduardo)\n\nAllophonic(eduardo) and forall x (Allophonic(x) -> Billed(x)) -> therefore Billed(eduardo) Billed(eduardo) and forall x (Billed(x) -> Achromatic(x)) -> therefore Achromatic(eduardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Slim is kittenish. Philippe is not bifoliate. Pacifica is kittenish. If something is turbid then it is kittenish. If something is filipino and not bifoliate then it is plentiful. If something is unlabeled then it is plentiful. Quiet things are unlabeled. All bifoliate, unlabeled things are filipino. All bifoliate things are filipino. Big, turbid things are filipino. If Slim is plentiful and Slim is unlabeled then Slim is not turbid. Slim is not turbid.", "logic": "\nKittenish(slim)\nnot Bifoliate(philippe)\nKittenish(pacifica)\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Filipino(x) and not Bifoliate(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Kittenish(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) and Unlabeled(x) -> Filipino(x))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Filipino(x))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) and Turbid(x) -> Filipino(x))\nPlentiful(slim) and Unlabeled(slim) -> not Turbid(slim)\n\nnot Turbid(slim)\n\nKittenish(slim) and forall x (Kittenish(x) -> Unlabeled(x)) -> therefore Unlabeled(slim) Unlabeled(slim) and forall x (Unlabeled(x) -> Plentiful(x)) -> therefore Plentiful(slim) Kittenish(slim) and forall x (Kittenish(x) -> Unlabeled(x)) -> therefore Unlabeled(slim) Plentiful(slim) and Unlabeled(slim) and Plentiful(slim) and Unlabeled(slim) -> not Turbid(slim) -> therefore not Turbid(slim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Rog is intensive. Jehanna is not postural. Garwin is intensive. If something is drilled then it is intensive. If something is balding and not postural then it is lapidary. If something is scotch then it is lapidary. Quiet things are scotch. All postural, scotch things are balding. All postural things are balding. Big, drilled things are balding. If Rog is lapidary and Rog is scotch then Rog is not drilled. Rog is drilled.", "logic": "\nIntensive(rog)\nnot Postural(jehanna)\nIntensive(garwin)\nforall x (Drilled(x) -> Intensive(x))\nforall x (Balding(x) and not Postural(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Scotch(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Intensive(x) -> Scotch(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) and Scotch(x) -> Balding(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) -> Balding(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) and Drilled(x) -> Balding(x))\nLapidary(rog) and Scotch(rog) -> not Drilled(rog)\n\nDrilled(rog)\n\nIntensive(rog) and forall x (Intensive(x) -> Scotch(x)) -> therefore Scotch(rog) Scotch(rog) and forall x (Scotch(x) -> Lapidary(x)) -> therefore Lapidary(rog) Intensive(rog) and forall x (Intensive(x) -> Scotch(x)) -> therefore Scotch(rog) Lapidary(rog) and Scotch(rog) and Lapidary(rog) and Scotch(rog) -> not Drilled(rog) -> therefore not Drilled(rog)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Deeanne is unmusical. Waverly is not unleavened. Rozalie is unmusical. If something is cinerary then it is unmusical. If something is seismic and not unleavened then it is foolish. If something is lucifugal then it is foolish. Quiet things are lucifugal. All unleavened, lucifugal things are seismic. All unleavened things are seismic. Big, cinerary things are seismic. If Deeanne is foolish and Deeanne is lucifugal then Deeanne is not cinerary. Rozalie is not seismic.", "logic": "\nUnmusical(deeanne)\nnot Unleavened(waverly)\nUnmusical(rozalie)\nforall x (Cinerary(x) -> Unmusical(x))\nforall x (Seismic(x) and not Unleavened(x) -> Foolish(x))\nforall x (Lucifugal(x) -> Foolish(x))\nforall x (Unmusical(x) -> Lucifugal(x))\nforall x (Unleavened(x) and Lucifugal(x) -> Seismic(x))\nforall x (Unleavened(x) -> Seismic(x))\nforall x (Unleavened(x) and Cinerary(x) -> Seismic(x))\nFoolish(deeanne) and Lucifugal(deeanne) -> not Cinerary(deeanne)\n\nnot Seismic(rozalie)\n\nforall x (Unleavened(x) and Lucifugal(x) -> Seismic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Nathanil is extendible. Manfred is not decussate. Margareta is extendible. If something is uptown then it is extendible. If something is ennobling and not decussate then it is higher. If something is wrought then it is higher. Quiet things are wrought. All decussate, wrought things are ennobling. All decussate things are ennobling. Big, uptown things are ennobling. If Nathanil is higher and Nathanil is wrought then Nathanil is not uptown. Manfred is wrought.", "logic": "\nExtendible(nathanil)\nnot Decussate(manfred)\nExtendible(margareta)\nforall x (Uptown(x) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) and not Decussate(x) -> Higher(x))\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> Higher(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Wrought(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) and Wrought(x) -> Ennobling(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) -> Ennobling(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) and Uptown(x) -> Ennobling(x))\nHigher(nathanil) and Wrought(nathanil) -> not Uptown(nathanil)\n\nWrought(manfred)\n\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Wrought(x)) <- forall x (Uptown(x) -> Extendible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Mead is aired. Werner is not cormose. Roxanne is aired. If something is rusty then it is aired. If something is dyadic and not cormose then it is epithelial. If something is horrid then it is epithelial. Quiet things are horrid. All cormose, horrid things are dyadic. All cormose things are dyadic. Big, rusty things are dyadic. If Mead is epithelial and Mead is horrid then Mead is not rusty. Mead is not dyadic.", "logic": "\nAired(mead)\nnot Cormose(werner)\nAired(roxanne)\nforall x (Rusty(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Dyadic(x) and not Cormose(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Aired(x) -> Horrid(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) and Horrid(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) and Rusty(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nEpithelial(mead) and Horrid(mead) -> not Rusty(mead)\n\nnot Dyadic(mead)\n\nforall x (Cormose(x) and Horrid(x) -> Dyadic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Randell is bass. Elfreda is not choosey. Garrot is bass. If something is contiguous then it is bass. If something is bicornate and not choosey then it is unisex. If something is cairned then it is unisex. Quiet things are cairned. All choosey, cairned things are bicornate. All choosey things are bicornate. Big, contiguous things are bicornate. If Randell is unisex and Randell is cairned then Randell is not contiguous. Elfreda is bass.", "logic": "\nBass(randell)\nnot Choosey(elfreda)\nBass(garrot)\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Bass(x))\nforall x (Bicornate(x) and not Choosey(x) -> Unisex(x))\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Unisex(x))\nforall x (Bass(x) -> Cairned(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Cairned(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Contiguous(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nUnisex(randell) and Cairned(randell) -> not Contiguous(randell)\n\nBass(elfreda)\n\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Bass(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Kendal is tendinous. Blinni is not vacuous. Almeta is tendinous. If something is volant then it is tendinous. If something is lunisolar and not vacuous then it is menopausal. If something is jellied then it is menopausal. Quiet things are jellied. All vacuous, jellied things are lunisolar. All vacuous things are lunisolar. Big, volant things are lunisolar. If Kendal is menopausal and Kendal is jellied then Kendal is not volant. Almeta is not red.", "logic": "\nTendinous(kendal)\nnot Vacuous(blinni)\nTendinous(almeta)\nforall x (Volant(x) -> Tendinous(x))\nforall x (Lunisolar(x) and not Vacuous(x) -> Menopausal(x))\nforall x (Jellied(x) -> Menopausal(x))\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> Jellied(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Jellied(x) -> Lunisolar(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) -> Lunisolar(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Volant(x) -> Lunisolar(x))\nMenopausal(kendal) and Jellied(kendal) -> not Volant(kendal)\n\nnot Red(almeta)\n\nnot Red(almeta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Jeffery is noble. Keslie is not embattled. Hailey is noble. If something is unleavened then it is noble. If something is teenage and not embattled then it is unusual. If something is peninsular then it is unusual. Quiet things are peninsular. All embattled, peninsular things are teenage. All embattled things are teenage. Big, unleavened things are teenage. If Jeffery is unusual and Jeffery is peninsular then Jeffery is not unleavened. Hailey is embattled.", "logic": "\nNoble(jeffery)\nnot Embattled(keslie)\nNoble(hailey)\nforall x (Unleavened(x) -> Noble(x))\nforall x (Teenage(x) and not Embattled(x) -> Unusual(x))\nforall x (Peninsular(x) -> Unusual(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Peninsular(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) and Peninsular(x) -> Teenage(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) -> Teenage(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) and Unleavened(x) -> Teenage(x))\nUnusual(jeffery) and Peninsular(jeffery) -> not Unleavened(jeffery)\n\nEmbattled(hailey)\n\nEmbattled(hailey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Mercie is overcast. Armstrong is not truncate. Caroline is overcast. If something is marvelous then it is overcast. If something is sebaceous and not truncate then it is gimbaled. If something is sublunar then it is gimbaled. Quiet things are sublunar. All truncate, sublunar things are sebaceous. All truncate things are sebaceous. Big, marvelous things are sebaceous. If Mercie is gimbaled and Mercie is sublunar then Mercie is not marvelous. Caroline is not marvelous.", "logic": "\nOvercast(mercie)\nnot Truncate(armstrong)\nOvercast(caroline)\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Sebaceous(x) and not Truncate(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Overcast(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Truncate(x) and Sublunar(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nforall x (Truncate(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nforall x (Truncate(x) and Marvelous(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nGimbaled(mercie) and Sublunar(mercie) -> not Marvelous(mercie)\n\nnot Marvelous(caroline)\n\nnot Marvelous(caroline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Lenette is luxuriant. Barn is not purgative. Arie is luxuriant. If something is bulbar then it is luxuriant. If something is admissible and not purgative then it is soulful. If something is brahminic then it is soulful. Quiet things are brahminic. All purgative, brahminic things are admissible. All purgative things are admissible. Big, bulbar things are admissible. If Lenette is soulful and Lenette is brahminic then Lenette is not bulbar. Barn is red.", "logic": "\nLuxuriant(lenette)\nnot Purgative(barn)\nLuxuriant(arie)\nforall x (Bulbar(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Admissible(x) and not Purgative(x) -> Soulful(x))\nforall x (Brahminic(x) -> Soulful(x))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Brahminic(x))\nforall x (Purgative(x) and Brahminic(x) -> Admissible(x))\nforall x (Purgative(x) -> Admissible(x))\nforall x (Purgative(x) and Bulbar(x) -> Admissible(x))\nSoulful(lenette) and Brahminic(lenette) -> not Bulbar(lenette)\n\nRed(barn)\n\nRed(barn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Ricardo is gingival. Gunilla is insulting. Torey is flustered. Beverlee is campanular. If someone is gingival and embroiled then they are campanular. All embroiled, flustered people are landlocked. If Beverlee is campanular then Beverlee is landlocked. If someone is campanular then they are taxable. All insulting people are embroiled. Cold, landlocked people are insulting. Round people are taxable. If Ricardo is campanular and Ricardo is taxable then Ricardo is flustered. Ricardo is gingival.", "logic": "\nGingival(ricardo)\nInsulting(gunilla)\nFlustered(torey)\nCampanular(beverlee)\nforall x (Gingival(x) and Embroiled(x) -> Campanular(x))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and Flustered(x) -> Landlocked(x))\nCampanular(beverlee) -> Landlocked(beverlee)\nforall x (Campanular(x) -> Taxable(x))\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Embroiled(x))\nforall x (Taxable(x) and Landlocked(x) -> Insulting(x))\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Taxable(x))\nCampanular(ricardo) and Taxable(ricardo) -> Flustered(ricardo)\n\nGingival(ricardo)\n\ntherefore Gingival(ricardo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Lynsey is horrified. Roz is assiduous. Chrissa is visceral. Kathi is neonatal. If someone is horrified and unchanged then they are neonatal. All unchanged, visceral people are unshaved. If Kathi is neonatal then Kathi is unshaved. If someone is neonatal then they are citric. All assiduous people are unchanged. Cold, unshaved people are assiduous. Round people are citric. If Lynsey is neonatal and Lynsey is citric then Lynsey is visceral. Kathi is not neonatal.", "logic": "\nHorrified(lynsey)\nAssiduous(roz)\nVisceral(chrissa)\nNeonatal(kathi)\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Unchanged(x) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) and Visceral(x) -> Unshaved(x))\nNeonatal(kathi) -> Unshaved(kathi)\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Citric(x))\nforall x (Assiduous(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Citric(x) and Unshaved(x) -> Assiduous(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Citric(x))\nNeonatal(lynsey) and Citric(lynsey) -> Visceral(lynsey)\n\nnot Neonatal(kathi)\n\ntherefore Neonatal(kathi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Giffer is iterative. Garvy is bionic. Wesley is partial. Rochester is exoergic. If someone is iterative and skanky then they are exoergic. All skanky, partial people are soaked. If Rochester is exoergic then Rochester is soaked. If someone is exoergic then they are synclinal. All bionic people are skanky. Cold, soaked people are bionic. Round people are synclinal. If Giffer is exoergic and Giffer is synclinal then Giffer is partial. Garvy is skanky.", "logic": "\nIterative(giffer)\nBionic(garvy)\nPartial(wesley)\nExoergic(rochester)\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Skanky(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Skanky(x) and Partial(x) -> Soaked(x))\nExoergic(rochester) -> Soaked(rochester)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Bionic(x) -> Skanky(x))\nforall x (Synclinal(x) and Soaked(x) -> Bionic(x))\nforall x (Soaked(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nExoergic(giffer) and Synclinal(giffer) -> Partial(giffer)\n\nSkanky(garvy)\n\nBionic(garvy) and forall x (Bionic(x) -> Skanky(x)) -> therefore Skanky(garvy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Sarah is gauntleted. Lida is slatternly. Elinore is autoicous. Novelia is enjoyable. If someone is gauntleted and repand then they are enjoyable. All repand, autoicous people are unexcelled. If Novelia is enjoyable then Novelia is unexcelled. If someone is enjoyable then they are matchless. All slatternly people are repand. Cold, unexcelled people are slatternly. Round people are matchless. If Sarah is enjoyable and Sarah is matchless then Sarah is autoicous. Novelia is not unexcelled.", "logic": "\nGauntleted(sarah)\nSlatternly(lida)\nAutoicous(elinore)\nEnjoyable(novelia)\nforall x (Gauntleted(x) and Repand(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\nforall x (Repand(x) and Autoicous(x) -> Unexcelled(x))\nEnjoyable(novelia) -> Unexcelled(novelia)\nforall x (Enjoyable(x) -> Matchless(x))\nforall x (Slatternly(x) -> Repand(x))\nforall x (Matchless(x) and Unexcelled(x) -> Slatternly(x))\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Matchless(x))\nEnjoyable(sarah) and Matchless(sarah) -> Autoicous(sarah)\n\nnot Unexcelled(novelia)\n\nEnjoyable(novelia) and Enjoyable(novelia) -> Unexcelled(novelia) -> therefore Unexcelled(novelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Octavia is tyrolese. Aviva is unthought. Elberta is evasive. Mickie is obscene. If someone is tyrolese and perceived then they are obscene. All perceived, evasive people are savoury. If Mickie is obscene then Mickie is savoury. If someone is obscene then they are pederastic. All unthought people are perceived. Cold, savoury people are unthought. Round people are pederastic. If Octavia is obscene and Octavia is pederastic then Octavia is evasive. Mickie is unthought.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(octavia)\nUnthought(aviva)\nEvasive(elberta)\nObscene(mickie)\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) and Perceived(x) -> Obscene(x))\nforall x (Perceived(x) and Evasive(x) -> Savoury(x))\nObscene(mickie) -> Savoury(mickie)\nforall x (Obscene(x) -> Pederastic(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Perceived(x))\nforall x (Pederastic(x) and Savoury(x) -> Unthought(x))\nforall x (Savoury(x) -> Pederastic(x))\nObscene(octavia) and Pederastic(octavia) -> Evasive(octavia)\n\nUnthought(mickie)\n\nObscene(mickie) and forall x (Obscene(x) -> Pederastic(x)) -> therefore Pederastic(mickie) Obscene(mickie) and Obscene(mickie) -> Savoury(mickie) -> therefore Savoury(mickie) Pederastic(mickie) and Savoury(mickie) and forall x (Pederastic(x) and Savoury(x) -> Unthought(x)) -> therefore Unthought(mickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Ludvig is winey. Jasper is pitchy. Sigmund is unhoped. Meyer is lonesome. If someone is winey and nonnomadic then they are lonesome. All nonnomadic, unhoped people are pyloric. If Meyer is lonesome then Meyer is pyloric. If someone is lonesome then they are shady. All pitchy people are nonnomadic. Cold, pyloric people are pitchy. Round people are shady. If Ludvig is lonesome and Ludvig is shady then Ludvig is unhoped. Meyer is not pitchy.", "logic": "\nWiney(ludvig)\nPitchy(jasper)\nUnhoped(sigmund)\nLonesome(meyer)\nforall x (Winey(x) and Nonnomadic(x) -> Lonesome(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) and Unhoped(x) -> Pyloric(x))\nLonesome(meyer) -> Pyloric(meyer)\nforall x (Lonesome(x) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) -> Nonnomadic(x))\nforall x (Shady(x) and Pyloric(x) -> Pitchy(x))\nforall x (Pyloric(x) -> Shady(x))\nLonesome(ludvig) and Shady(ludvig) -> Unhoped(ludvig)\n\nnot Pitchy(meyer)\n\nLonesome(meyer) and forall x (Lonesome(x) -> Shady(x)) -> therefore Shady(meyer) Lonesome(meyer) and Lonesome(meyer) -> Pyloric(meyer) -> therefore Pyloric(meyer) Shady(meyer) and Pyloric(meyer) and forall x (Shady(x) and Pyloric(x) -> Pitchy(x)) -> therefore Pitchy(meyer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Mariska is uncut. Anatollo is reckless. Illa is putrid. Sue is copular. If someone is uncut and exemplary then they are copular. All exemplary, putrid people are reasoned. If Sue is copular then Sue is reasoned. If someone is copular then they are bohemian. All reckless people are exemplary. Cold, reasoned people are reckless. Round people are bohemian. If Mariska is copular and Mariska is bohemian then Mariska is putrid. Sue is exemplary.", "logic": "\nUncut(mariska)\nReckless(anatollo)\nPutrid(illa)\nCopular(sue)\nforall x (Uncut(x) and Exemplary(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Exemplary(x) and Putrid(x) -> Reasoned(x))\nCopular(sue) -> Reasoned(sue)\nforall x (Copular(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Reckless(x))\nforall x (Reasoned(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nCopular(mariska) and Bohemian(mariska) -> Putrid(mariska)\n\nExemplary(sue)\n\nCopular(sue) and forall x (Copular(x) -> Bohemian(x)) -> therefore Bohemian(sue) Copular(sue) and Copular(sue) -> Reasoned(sue) -> therefore Reasoned(sue) Bohemian(sue) and Reasoned(sue) and forall x (Bohemian(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Reckless(x)) -> therefore Reckless(sue) Reckless(sue) and forall x (Reckless(x) -> Exemplary(x)) -> therefore Exemplary(sue)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Rosemaria is dispersive. Opalina is fearsome. Megan is choky. Phillida is prior. If someone is dispersive and woodsy then they are prior. All woodsy, choky people are paneled. If Phillida is prior then Phillida is paneled. If someone is prior then they are tenderized. All fearsome people are woodsy. Cold, paneled people are fearsome. Round people are tenderized. If Rosemaria is prior and Rosemaria is tenderized then Rosemaria is choky. Phillida is not woodsy.", "logic": "\nDispersive(rosemaria)\nFearsome(opalina)\nChoky(megan)\nPrior(phillida)\nforall x (Dispersive(x) and Woodsy(x) -> Prior(x))\nforall x (Woodsy(x) and Choky(x) -> Paneled(x))\nPrior(phillida) -> Paneled(phillida)\nforall x (Prior(x) -> Tenderized(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) and Paneled(x) -> Fearsome(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Tenderized(x))\nPrior(rosemaria) and Tenderized(rosemaria) -> Choky(rosemaria)\n\nnot Woodsy(phillida)\n\nPrior(phillida) and forall x (Prior(x) -> Tenderized(x)) -> therefore Tenderized(phillida) Prior(phillida) and Prior(phillida) -> Paneled(phillida) -> therefore Paneled(phillida) Tenderized(phillida) and Paneled(phillida) and forall x (Tenderized(x) and Paneled(x) -> Fearsome(x)) -> therefore Fearsome(phillida) Fearsome(phillida) and forall x (Fearsome(x) -> Woodsy(x)) -> therefore Woodsy(phillida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Luelle is soundless. Jerrilee is blocked. Talbot is grisly. Gerhardt is splashy. If someone is soundless and apical then they are splashy. All apical, grisly people are revealing. If Gerhardt is splashy then Gerhardt is revealing. If someone is splashy then they are belemnitic. All blocked people are apical. Cold, revealing people are blocked. Round people are belemnitic. If Luelle is splashy and Luelle is belemnitic then Luelle is grisly. Luelle is not apical.", "logic": "\nSoundless(luelle)\nBlocked(jerrilee)\nGrisly(talbot)\nSplashy(gerhardt)\nforall x (Soundless(x) and Apical(x) -> Splashy(x))\nforall x (Apical(x) and Grisly(x) -> Revealing(x))\nSplashy(gerhardt) -> Revealing(gerhardt)\nforall x (Splashy(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Apical(x))\nforall x (Belemnitic(x) and Revealing(x) -> Blocked(x))\nforall x (Revealing(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\nSplashy(luelle) and Belemnitic(luelle) -> Grisly(luelle)\n\nnot Apical(luelle)\n\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Apical(x)) <- forall x (Belemnitic(x) and Revealing(x) -> Blocked(x)) <- forall x (Apical(x) and Grisly(x) -> Revealing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Trix is sparkly. Katherina is opposing. Donn is unblended. Yanaton is summary. If someone is sparkly and pyramidic then they are summary. All pyramidic, unblended people are hundred. If Yanaton is summary then Yanaton is hundred. If someone is summary then they are oily. All opposing people are pyramidic. Cold, hundred people are opposing. Round people are oily. If Trix is summary and Trix is oily then Trix is unblended. Katherina is oily.", "logic": "\nSparkly(trix)\nOpposing(katherina)\nUnblended(donn)\nSummary(yanaton)\nforall x (Sparkly(x) and Pyramidic(x) -> Summary(x))\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) and Unblended(x) -> Hundred(x))\nSummary(yanaton) -> Hundred(yanaton)\nforall x (Summary(x) -> Oily(x))\nforall x (Opposing(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nforall x (Oily(x) and Hundred(x) -> Opposing(x))\nforall x (Hundred(x) -> Oily(x))\nSummary(trix) and Oily(trix) -> Unblended(trix)\n\nOily(katherina)\n\nforall x (Summary(x) -> Oily(x)) <- forall x (Sparkly(x) and Pyramidic(x) -> Summary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Kamillah is stooped. Harley is scratchy. Mel is quantal. Brewer is spiral. If someone is stooped and anecdotal then they are spiral. All anecdotal, quantal people are wise. If Brewer is spiral then Brewer is wise. If someone is spiral then they are pent. All scratchy people are anecdotal. Cold, wise people are scratchy. Round people are pent. If Kamillah is spiral and Kamillah is pent then Kamillah is quantal. Mel is not scratchy.", "logic": "\nStooped(kamillah)\nScratchy(harley)\nQuantal(mel)\nSpiral(brewer)\nforall x (Stooped(x) and Anecdotal(x) -> Spiral(x))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) and Quantal(x) -> Wise(x))\nSpiral(brewer) -> Wise(brewer)\nforall x (Spiral(x) -> Pent(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\nforall x (Pent(x) and Wise(x) -> Scratchy(x))\nforall x (Wise(x) -> Pent(x))\nSpiral(kamillah) and Pent(kamillah) -> Quantal(kamillah)\n\nnot Scratchy(mel)\n\nforall x (Pent(x) and Wise(x) -> Scratchy(x)) <- forall x (Anecdotal(x) and Quantal(x) -> Wise(x)) <- forall x (Scratchy(x) -> Anecdotal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Bennett is phoenician. Alonso is succinct. Alix is gradable. Gredel is consequent. If someone is phoenician and arch then they are consequent. All arch, gradable people are silky. If Gredel is consequent then Gredel is silky. If someone is consequent then they are groveling. All succinct people are arch. Cold, silky people are succinct. Round people are groveling. If Bennett is consequent and Bennett is groveling then Bennett is gradable. Alix is arch.", "logic": "\nPhoenician(bennett)\nSuccinct(alonso)\nGradable(alix)\nConsequent(gredel)\nforall x (Phoenician(x) and Arch(x) -> Consequent(x))\nforall x (Arch(x) and Gradable(x) -> Silky(x))\nConsequent(gredel) -> Silky(gredel)\nforall x (Consequent(x) -> Groveling(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Arch(x))\nforall x (Groveling(x) and Silky(x) -> Succinct(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) -> Groveling(x))\nConsequent(bennett) and Groveling(bennett) -> Gradable(bennett)\n\nArch(alix)\n\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Arch(x)) <- forall x (Groveling(x) and Silky(x) -> Succinct(x)) <- forall x (Arch(x) and Gradable(x) -> Silky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Kassi is national. Nathalie is pyogenic. Cami is dreaded. Iris is unrelaxed. If someone is national and synclinal then they are unrelaxed. All synclinal, dreaded people are pathogenic. If Iris is unrelaxed then Iris is pathogenic. If someone is unrelaxed then they are lilac. All pyogenic people are synclinal. Cold, pathogenic people are pyogenic. Round people are lilac. If Kassi is unrelaxed and Kassi is lilac then Kassi is dreaded. Cami is not national.", "logic": "\nNational(kassi)\nPyogenic(nathalie)\nDreaded(cami)\nUnrelaxed(iris)\nforall x (National(x) and Synclinal(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Synclinal(x) and Dreaded(x) -> Pathogenic(x))\nUnrelaxed(iris) -> Pathogenic(iris)\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Lilac(x) and Pathogenic(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Pathogenic(x) -> Lilac(x))\nUnrelaxed(kassi) and Lilac(kassi) -> Dreaded(kassi)\n\nnot National(cami)\n\nnot National(cami) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Eddie is insurgent. Wolfy is blushful. Josie is skilful. Alain is zambian. If someone is insurgent and folksy then they are zambian. All folksy, skilful people are thai. If Alain is zambian then Alain is thai. If someone is zambian then they are youthful. All blushful people are folksy. Cold, thai people are blushful. Round people are youthful. If Eddie is zambian and Eddie is youthful then Eddie is skilful. Alain is insurgent.", "logic": "\nInsurgent(eddie)\nBlushful(wolfy)\nSkilful(josie)\nZambian(alain)\nforall x (Insurgent(x) and Folksy(x) -> Zambian(x))\nforall x (Folksy(x) and Skilful(x) -> Thai(x))\nZambian(alain) -> Thai(alain)\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Youthful(x))\nforall x (Blushful(x) -> Folksy(x))\nforall x (Youthful(x) and Thai(x) -> Blushful(x))\nforall x (Thai(x) -> Youthful(x))\nZambian(eddie) and Youthful(eddie) -> Skilful(eddie)\n\nInsurgent(alain)\n\nInsurgent(alain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Sander is backless. Conchita is xlii. Gayla is unavowed. Rosalinde is laureate. If someone is backless and vermiform then they are laureate. All vermiform, unavowed people are alphameric. If Rosalinde is laureate then Rosalinde is alphameric. If someone is laureate then they are carbolated. All xlii people are vermiform. Cold, alphameric people are xlii. Round people are carbolated. If Sander is laureate and Sander is carbolated then Sander is unavowed. Rosalinde is not unavowed.", "logic": "\nBackless(sander)\nXlii(conchita)\nUnavowed(gayla)\nLaureate(rosalinde)\nforall x (Backless(x) and Vermiform(x) -> Laureate(x))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) and Unavowed(x) -> Alphameric(x))\nLaureate(rosalinde) -> Alphameric(rosalinde)\nforall x (Laureate(x) -> Carbolated(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Vermiform(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) and Alphameric(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Alphameric(x) -> Carbolated(x))\nLaureate(sander) and Carbolated(sander) -> Unavowed(sander)\n\nnot Unavowed(rosalinde)\n\nnot Unavowed(rosalinde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Rudy is bareback. Godard is binucleate. Jermain is sorted. Allis is adaxial. If someone is bareback and paschal then they are adaxial. All paschal, sorted people are flyspeck. If Allis is adaxial then Allis is flyspeck. If someone is adaxial then they are unbendable. All binucleate people are paschal. Cold, flyspeck people are binucleate. Round people are unbendable. If Rudy is adaxial and Rudy is unbendable then Rudy is sorted. Godard is bareback.", "logic": "\nBareback(rudy)\nBinucleate(godard)\nSorted(jermain)\nAdaxial(allis)\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Paschal(x) -> Adaxial(x))\nforall x (Paschal(x) and Sorted(x) -> Flyspeck(x))\nAdaxial(allis) -> Flyspeck(allis)\nforall x (Adaxial(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) -> Paschal(x))\nforall x (Unbendable(x) and Flyspeck(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nAdaxial(rudy) and Unbendable(rudy) -> Sorted(rudy)\n\nBareback(godard)\n\nBareback(godard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Trixi is worst. Ardra is crazed. Lorrie is wearying. Belicia is arsenical. Smart things are arsenical. If something is arsenical then it is crazed. All wearying things are worst. Belicia is arsenical.", "logic": "\nWorst(trixi)\nCrazed(ardra)\nWearying(lorrie)\nArsenical(belicia)\nforall x (Worst(x) -> Arsenical(x))\nforall x (Arsenical(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Worst(x))\n\nArsenical(belicia)\n\ntherefore Arsenical(belicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Zarah is berserk. Evvy is eellike. Corette is unedited. Nils is steadying. Smart things are steadying. If something is steadying then it is eellike. All unedited things are berserk. Evvy is not eellike.", "logic": "\nBerserk(zarah)\nEellike(evvy)\nUnedited(corette)\nSteadying(nils)\nforall x (Berserk(x) -> Steadying(x))\nforall x (Steadying(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) -> Berserk(x))\n\nnot Eellike(evvy)\n\ntherefore Eellike(evvy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Willard is worthful. Lorenza is vivacious. Barbabra is embedded. Minetta is localized. Smart things are localized. If something is localized then it is vivacious. All embedded things are worthful. Willard is localized.", "logic": "\nWorthful(willard)\nVivacious(lorenza)\nEmbedded(barbabra)\nLocalized(minetta)\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Localized(x) -> Vivacious(x))\nforall x (Embedded(x) -> Worthful(x))\n\nLocalized(willard)\n\nWorthful(willard) and forall x (Worthful(x) -> Localized(x)) -> therefore Localized(willard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Bell is cowardly. Redford is matutinal. Birgitta is morbid. Chantalle is sulphuric. Smart things are sulphuric. If something is sulphuric then it is matutinal. All morbid things are cowardly. Chantalle is not matutinal.", "logic": "\nCowardly(bell)\nMatutinal(redford)\nMorbid(birgitta)\nSulphuric(chantalle)\nforall x (Cowardly(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Matutinal(x))\nforall x (Morbid(x) -> Cowardly(x))\n\nnot Matutinal(chantalle)\n\nSulphuric(chantalle) and forall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Matutinal(x)) -> therefore Matutinal(chantalle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Gregor is summative. Gale is algebraic. Phillie is shaven. Butler is pretorial. Smart things are pretorial. If something is pretorial then it is algebraic. All shaven things are summative. Gregor is algebraic.", "logic": "\nSummative(gregor)\nAlgebraic(gale)\nShaven(phillie)\nPretorial(butler)\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Pretorial(x))\nforall x (Pretorial(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Summative(x))\n\nAlgebraic(gregor)\n\nSummative(gregor) and forall x (Summative(x) -> Pretorial(x)) -> therefore Pretorial(gregor) Pretorial(gregor) and forall x (Pretorial(x) -> Algebraic(x)) -> therefore Algebraic(gregor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Kameko is ferrous. Arthur is ergonomic. Joane is disguised. Mirabel is alienable. Smart things are alienable. If something is alienable then it is ergonomic. All disguised things are ferrous. Joane is not alienable.", "logic": "\nFerrous(kameko)\nErgonomic(arthur)\nDisguised(joane)\nAlienable(mirabel)\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Alienable(x))\nforall x (Alienable(x) -> Ergonomic(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) -> Ferrous(x))\n\nnot Alienable(joane)\n\nDisguised(joane) and forall x (Disguised(x) -> Ferrous(x)) -> therefore Ferrous(joane) Ferrous(joane) and forall x (Ferrous(x) -> Alienable(x)) -> therefore Alienable(joane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Andriette is unfirm. Angy is diminutive. Ciel is diagnostic. Englebert is ignited. Smart things are ignited. If something is ignited then it is diminutive. All diagnostic things are unfirm. Ciel is diminutive.", "logic": "\nUnfirm(andriette)\nDiminutive(angy)\nDiagnostic(ciel)\nIgnited(englebert)\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Diagnostic(x) -> Unfirm(x))\n\nDiminutive(ciel)\n\nDiagnostic(ciel) and forall x (Diagnostic(x) -> Unfirm(x)) -> therefore Unfirm(ciel) Unfirm(ciel) and forall x (Unfirm(x) -> Ignited(x)) -> therefore Ignited(ciel) Ignited(ciel) and forall x (Ignited(x) -> Diminutive(x)) -> therefore Diminutive(ciel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Tatum is mateless. Ranee is advertent. Rock is weeklong. Peter is longtime. Smart things are longtime. If something is longtime then it is advertent. All weeklong things are mateless. Rock is not advertent.", "logic": "\nMateless(tatum)\nAdvertent(ranee)\nWeeklong(rock)\nLongtime(peter)\nforall x (Mateless(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Longtime(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Weeklong(x) -> Mateless(x))\n\nnot Advertent(rock)\n\nWeeklong(rock) and forall x (Weeklong(x) -> Mateless(x)) -> therefore Mateless(rock) Mateless(rock) and forall x (Mateless(x) -> Longtime(x)) -> therefore Longtime(rock) Longtime(rock) and forall x (Longtime(x) -> Advertent(x)) -> therefore Advertent(rock)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Berrie is unprovable. Clarisa is enmeshed. Reina is crumbly. Grayce is suntanned. Smart things are suntanned. If something is suntanned then it is enmeshed. All crumbly things are unprovable. Grayce is not unprovable.", "logic": "\nUnprovable(berrie)\nEnmeshed(clarisa)\nCrumbly(reina)\nSuntanned(grayce)\nforall x (Unprovable(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) -> Enmeshed(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Unprovable(x))\n\nnot Unprovable(grayce)\n\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Unprovable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Lucius is rich. Danielle is poriferous. Orelee is cursed. Melissa is verified. Smart things are verified. If something is verified then it is poriferous. All cursed things are rich. Danielle is verified.", "logic": "\nRich(lucius)\nPoriferous(danielle)\nCursed(orelee)\nVerified(melissa)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Verified(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Cursed(x) -> Rich(x))\n\nVerified(danielle)\n\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Verified(x)) <- forall x (Cursed(x) -> Rich(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Deeanne is anionic. Donnie is yemeni. Loni is biweekly. Ward is churning. Smart things are churning. If something is churning then it is yemeni. All biweekly things are anionic. Donnie is not anionic.", "logic": "\nAnionic(deeanne)\nYemeni(donnie)\nBiweekly(loni)\nChurning(ward)\nforall x (Anionic(x) -> Churning(x))\nforall x (Churning(x) -> Yemeni(x))\nforall x (Biweekly(x) -> Anionic(x))\n\nnot Anionic(donnie)\n\nforall x (Biweekly(x) -> Anionic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Pat is inlaid. Florida is notable. Norrie is unseamed. Clarance is supervised. Smart things are supervised. If something is supervised then it is notable. All unseamed things are inlaid. Pat is unseamed.", "logic": "\nInlaid(pat)\nNotable(florida)\nUnseamed(norrie)\nSupervised(clarance)\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Supervised(x))\nforall x (Supervised(x) -> Notable(x))\nforall x (Unseamed(x) -> Inlaid(x))\n\nUnseamed(pat)\n\nUnseamed(pat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Tarrah is carven. Aidan is autogenous. Lawerence is handsewn. Haywood is isometric. Smart things are isometric. If something is isometric then it is autogenous. All handsewn things are carven. Haywood is not red.", "logic": "\nCarven(tarrah)\nAutogenous(aidan)\nHandsewn(lawerence)\nIsometric(haywood)\nforall x (Carven(x) -> Isometric(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) -> Carven(x))\n\nnot Red(haywood)\n\nnot Red(haywood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Estele is urogenital. Fanechka is statuary. Bernelle is zygomatic. Cherrita is unhearing. Smart things are unhearing. If something is unhearing then it is statuary. All zygomatic things are urogenital. Cherrita is nice.", "logic": "\nUrogenital(estele)\nStatuary(fanechka)\nZygomatic(bernelle)\nUnhearing(cherrita)\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Unhearing(x))\nforall x (Unhearing(x) -> Statuary(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) -> Urogenital(x))\n\nNice(cherrita)\n\nNice(cherrita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Mildred is tailless. Aime is wonky. Everard is oldish. Rhianon is palatable. Smart things are palatable. If something is palatable then it is wonky. All oldish things are tailless. Mildred is not red.", "logic": "\nTailless(mildred)\nWonky(aime)\nOldish(everard)\nPalatable(rhianon)\nforall x (Tailless(x) -> Palatable(x))\nforall x (Palatable(x) -> Wonky(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) -> Tailless(x))\n\nnot Red(mildred)\n\nnot Red(mildred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Barrett is unwise. Harli is untroubled. Kirbee is pitiable. Nisa is equatorial. Smart things are equatorial. If something is equatorial then it is untroubled. All pitiable things are unwise. Kirbee is nice.", "logic": "\nUnwise(barrett)\nUntroubled(harli)\nPitiable(kirbee)\nEquatorial(nisa)\nforall x (Unwise(x) -> Equatorial(x))\nforall x (Equatorial(x) -> Untroubled(x))\nforall x (Pitiable(x) -> Unwise(x))\n\nNice(kirbee)\n\nNice(kirbee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "The madelaine reforest the westbrook. The westbrook slosh the madelaine. If the madelaine blubber the westbrook then the westbrook is unbaptised. If something reforest the madelaine then the madelaine blubber the westbrook. If something reforest the westbrook then it reforest the madelaine. If something blubber the westbrook then the westbrook is not uncordial. If something reforest the westbrook and the westbrook blubber the madelaine then the westbrook slosh the madelaine. If something is balking and it reforest the westbrook then it does not eat the westbrook. All dispersed things are not balking. If the madelaine blubber the westbrook and the westbrook does not eat the madelaine then the madelaine is dispersed. The westbrook slosh the madelaine.", "logic": "\nReforest(madelaine, westbrook)\nSlosh(westbrook, madelaine)\nBlubber(madelaine, westbrook) -> Unbaptised(westbrook)\nforall x (Reforest(x, madelaine) -> Blubber(madelaine, westbrook))\nforall x (Reforest(x, westbrook) -> Reforest(x, madelaine))\nforall x (Blubber(x, westbrook) -> not Uncordial(westbrook))\nforall x (Reforest(x, westbrook) and Blubber(westbrook, madelaine) -> Slosh(westbrook, madelaine))\nforall x (Balking(x) and Reforest(x, westbrook) -> not Slosh(x, westbrook))\nforall x (Dispersed(x) -> not Balking(x))\nBlubber(madelaine, westbrook) and not Slosh(westbrook, madelaine) -> Dispersed(madelaine)\n\nSlosh(westbrook, madelaine)\n\ntherefore Slosh(westbrook, madelaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The gunter tessellate the kathy. The kathy fancy the gunter. If the gunter gear the kathy then the kathy is korean. If something tessellate the gunter then the gunter gear the kathy. If something tessellate the kathy then it tessellate the gunter. If something gear the kathy then the kathy is not xxiv. If something tessellate the kathy and the kathy gear the gunter then the kathy fancy the gunter. If something is single and it tessellate the kathy then it does not eat the kathy. All promotive things are not single. If the gunter gear the kathy and the kathy does not eat the gunter then the gunter is promotive. The kathy does not eat the gunter.", "logic": "\nTessellate(gunter, kathy)\nFancy(kathy, gunter)\nGear(gunter, kathy) -> Korean(kathy)\nforall x (Tessellate(x, gunter) -> Gear(gunter, kathy))\nforall x (Tessellate(x, kathy) -> Tessellate(x, gunter))\nforall x (Gear(x, kathy) -> not Xxiv(kathy))\nforall x (Tessellate(x, kathy) and Gear(kathy, gunter) -> Fancy(kathy, gunter))\nforall x (Single(x) and Tessellate(x, kathy) -> not Fancy(x, kathy))\nforall x (Promotive(x) -> not Single(x))\nGear(gunter, kathy) and not Fancy(kathy, gunter) -> Promotive(gunter)\n\nnot Fancy(kathy, gunter)\n\ntherefore Fancy(kathy, gunter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The franz spiritise the adria. The adria notate the franz. If the franz assail the adria then the adria is insulting. If something spiritise the franz then the franz assail the adria. If something spiritise the adria then it spiritise the franz. If something assail the adria then the adria is not penurious. If something spiritise the adria and the adria assail the franz then the adria notate the franz. If something is worsening and it spiritise the adria then it does not eat the adria. All maiden things are not worsening. If the franz assail the adria and the adria does not eat the franz then the franz is maiden. The franz spiritise the franz.", "logic": "\nSpiritise(franz, adria)\nNotate(adria, franz)\nAssail(franz, adria) -> Insulting(adria)\nforall x (Spiritise(x, franz) -> Assail(franz, adria))\nforall x (Spiritise(x, adria) -> Spiritise(x, franz))\nforall x (Assail(x, adria) -> not Penurious(adria))\nforall x (Spiritise(x, adria) and Assail(adria, franz) -> Notate(adria, franz))\nforall x (Worsening(x) and Spiritise(x, adria) -> not Notate(x, adria))\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> not Worsening(x))\nAssail(franz, adria) and not Notate(adria, franz) -> Maiden(franz)\n\nSpiritise(franz, franz)\n\nSpiritise(franz, adria) and forall x (Spiritise(x, adria) -> Spiritise(x, franz)) -> therefore Spiritise(franz, franz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The salome encumber the geralda. The geralda iridesce the salome. If the salome canker the geralda then the geralda is evasive. If something encumber the salome then the salome canker the geralda. If something encumber the geralda then it encumber the salome. If something canker the geralda then the geralda is not dominican. If something encumber the geralda and the geralda canker the salome then the geralda iridesce the salome. If something is adept and it encumber the geralda then it does not eat the geralda. All exergonic things are not adept. If the salome canker the geralda and the geralda does not eat the salome then the salome is exergonic. The salome does not visit the salome.", "logic": "\nEncumber(salome, geralda)\nIridesce(geralda, salome)\nCanker(salome, geralda) -> Evasive(geralda)\nforall x (Encumber(x, salome) -> Canker(salome, geralda))\nforall x (Encumber(x, geralda) -> Encumber(x, salome))\nforall x (Canker(x, geralda) -> not Dominican(geralda))\nforall x (Encumber(x, geralda) and Canker(geralda, salome) -> Iridesce(geralda, salome))\nforall x (Adept(x) and Encumber(x, geralda) -> not Iridesce(x, geralda))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) -> not Adept(x))\nCanker(salome, geralda) and not Iridesce(geralda, salome) -> Exergonic(salome)\n\nnot Encumber(salome, salome)\n\nEncumber(salome, geralda) and forall x (Encumber(x, geralda) -> Encumber(x, salome)) -> therefore Encumber(salome, salome)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The ciel demob the chere. The chere coconspire the ciel. If the ciel deaerate the chere then the chere is sweetish. If something demob the ciel then the ciel deaerate the chere. If something demob the chere then it demob the ciel. If something deaerate the chere then the chere is not unstinting. If something demob the chere and the chere deaerate the ciel then the chere coconspire the ciel. If something is woven and it demob the chere then it does not eat the chere. All raining things are not woven. If the ciel deaerate the chere and the chere does not eat the ciel then the ciel is raining. The ciel deaerate the chere.", "logic": "\nDemob(ciel, chere)\nCoconspire(chere, ciel)\nDeaerate(ciel, chere) -> Sweetish(chere)\nforall x (Demob(x, ciel) -> Deaerate(ciel, chere))\nforall x (Demob(x, chere) -> Demob(x, ciel))\nforall x (Deaerate(x, chere) -> not Unstinting(chere))\nforall x (Demob(x, chere) and Deaerate(chere, ciel) -> Coconspire(chere, ciel))\nforall x (Woven(x) and Demob(x, chere) -> not Coconspire(x, chere))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> not Woven(x))\nDeaerate(ciel, chere) and not Coconspire(chere, ciel) -> Raining(ciel)\n\nDeaerate(ciel, chere)\n\nDemob(ciel, chere) and forall x (Demob(x, chere) -> Demob(x, ciel)) -> therefore Demob(ciel, ciel) Demob(ciel, ciel) and forall x (Demob(x, ciel) -> Deaerate(ciel, chere)) -> therefore Deaerate(ciel, chere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The delmar colourise the dorene. The dorene slaughter the delmar. If the delmar heliograph the dorene then the dorene is lingual. If something colourise the delmar then the delmar heliograph the dorene. If something colourise the dorene then it colourise the delmar. If something heliograph the dorene then the dorene is not malleable. If something colourise the dorene and the dorene heliograph the delmar then the dorene slaughter the delmar. If something is uphill and it colourise the dorene then it does not eat the dorene. All wheaten things are not uphill. If the delmar heliograph the dorene and the dorene does not eat the delmar then the delmar is wheaten. The delmar does not see the dorene.", "logic": "\nColourise(delmar, dorene)\nSlaughter(dorene, delmar)\nHeliograph(delmar, dorene) -> Lingual(dorene)\nforall x (Colourise(x, delmar) -> Heliograph(delmar, dorene))\nforall x (Colourise(x, dorene) -> Colourise(x, delmar))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, dorene) -> not Malleable(dorene))\nforall x (Colourise(x, dorene) and Heliograph(dorene, delmar) -> Slaughter(dorene, delmar))\nforall x (Uphill(x) and Colourise(x, dorene) -> not Slaughter(x, dorene))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) -> not Uphill(x))\nHeliograph(delmar, dorene) and not Slaughter(dorene, delmar) -> Wheaten(delmar)\n\nnot Heliograph(delmar, dorene)\n\nColourise(delmar, dorene) and forall x (Colourise(x, dorene) -> Colourise(x, delmar)) -> therefore Colourise(delmar, delmar) Colourise(delmar, delmar) and forall x (Colourise(x, delmar) -> Heliograph(delmar, dorene)) -> therefore Heliograph(delmar, dorene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The hank uncompress the sande. The sande moisten the hank. If the hank disembody the sande then the sande is thinkable. If something uncompress the hank then the hank disembody the sande. If something uncompress the sande then it uncompress the hank. If something disembody the sande then the sande is not uncarved. If something uncompress the sande and the sande disembody the hank then the sande moisten the hank. If something is bicyclic and it uncompress the sande then it does not eat the sande. All critical things are not bicyclic. If the hank disembody the sande and the sande does not eat the hank then the hank is critical. The sande is not uncarved.", "logic": "\nUncompress(hank, sande)\nMoisten(sande, hank)\nDisembody(hank, sande) -> Thinkable(sande)\nforall x (Uncompress(x, hank) -> Disembody(hank, sande))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, sande) -> Uncompress(x, hank))\nforall x (Disembody(x, sande) -> not Uncarved(sande))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, sande) and Disembody(sande, hank) -> Moisten(sande, hank))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Uncompress(x, sande) -> not Moisten(x, sande))\nforall x (Critical(x) -> not Bicyclic(x))\nDisembody(hank, sande) and not Moisten(sande, hank) -> Critical(hank)\n\nnot Uncarved(sande)\n\nUncompress(hank, sande) and forall x (Uncompress(x, sande) -> Uncompress(x, hank)) -> therefore Uncompress(hank, hank) Uncompress(hank, hank) and forall x (Uncompress(x, hank) -> Disembody(hank, sande)) -> therefore Disembody(hank, sande) Disembody(hank, sande) and forall x (Disembody(x, sande) -> not Uncarved(sande)) -> therefore not Uncarved(sande)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The antonio garnishee the ricard. The ricard soap the antonio. If the antonio engild the ricard then the ricard is mislabeled. If something garnishee the antonio then the antonio engild the ricard. If something garnishee the ricard then it garnishee the antonio. If something engild the ricard then the ricard is not forgiving. If something garnishee the ricard and the ricard engild the antonio then the ricard soap the antonio. If something is bizonal and it garnishee the ricard then it does not eat the ricard. All experient things are not bizonal. If the antonio engild the ricard and the ricard does not eat the antonio then the antonio is experient. The ricard is forgiving.", "logic": "\nGarnishee(antonio, ricard)\nSoap(ricard, antonio)\nEngild(antonio, ricard) -> Mislabeled(ricard)\nforall x (Garnishee(x, antonio) -> Engild(antonio, ricard))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, ricard) -> Garnishee(x, antonio))\nforall x (Engild(x, ricard) -> not Forgiving(ricard))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, ricard) and Engild(ricard, antonio) -> Soap(ricard, antonio))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) and Garnishee(x, ricard) -> not Soap(x, ricard))\nforall x (Experient(x) -> not Bizonal(x))\nEngild(antonio, ricard) and not Soap(ricard, antonio) -> Experient(antonio)\n\nForgiving(ricard)\n\nGarnishee(antonio, ricard) and forall x (Garnishee(x, ricard) -> Garnishee(x, antonio)) -> therefore Garnishee(antonio, antonio) Garnishee(antonio, antonio) and forall x (Garnishee(x, antonio) -> Engild(antonio, ricard)) -> therefore Engild(antonio, ricard) Engild(antonio, ricard) and forall x (Engild(x, ricard) -> not Forgiving(ricard)) -> therefore not Forgiving(ricard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The blithe mushroom the arden. The arden graduate the blithe. If the blithe sizz the arden then the arden is consecrate. If something mushroom the blithe then the blithe sizz the arden. If something mushroom the arden then it mushroom the blithe. If something sizz the arden then the arden is not tiled. If something mushroom the arden and the arden sizz the blithe then the arden graduate the blithe. If something is roughish and it mushroom the arden then it does not eat the arden. All ionized things are not roughish. If the blithe sizz the arden and the arden does not eat the blithe then the blithe is ionized. The blithe is not ionized.", "logic": "\nMushroom(blithe, arden)\nGraduate(arden, blithe)\nSizz(blithe, arden) -> Consecrate(arden)\nforall x (Mushroom(x, blithe) -> Sizz(blithe, arden))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, arden) -> Mushroom(x, blithe))\nforall x (Sizz(x, arden) -> not Tiled(arden))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, arden) and Sizz(arden, blithe) -> Graduate(arden, blithe))\nforall x (Roughish(x) and Mushroom(x, arden) -> not Graduate(x, arden))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> not Roughish(x))\nSizz(blithe, arden) and not Graduate(arden, blithe) -> Ionized(blithe)\n\nnot Ionized(blithe)\n\nSizz(blithe, arden) and not Graduate(arden, blithe) -> Ionized(blithe) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The herrmann concertise the ashly. The ashly uniform the herrmann. If the herrmann checkmate the ashly then the ashly is carpetbag. If something concertise the herrmann then the herrmann checkmate the ashly. If something concertise the ashly then it concertise the herrmann. If something checkmate the ashly then the ashly is not noisy. If something concertise the ashly and the ashly checkmate the herrmann then the ashly uniform the herrmann. If something is snotty and it concertise the ashly then it does not eat the ashly. All corded things are not snotty. If the herrmann checkmate the ashly and the ashly does not eat the herrmann then the herrmann is corded. The ashly concertise the herrmann.", "logic": "\nConcertise(herrmann, ashly)\nUniform(ashly, herrmann)\nCheckmate(herrmann, ashly) -> Carpetbag(ashly)\nforall x (Concertise(x, herrmann) -> Checkmate(herrmann, ashly))\nforall x (Concertise(x, ashly) -> Concertise(x, herrmann))\nforall x (Checkmate(x, ashly) -> not Noisy(ashly))\nforall x (Concertise(x, ashly) and Checkmate(ashly, herrmann) -> Uniform(ashly, herrmann))\nforall x (Snotty(x) and Concertise(x, ashly) -> not Uniform(x, ashly))\nforall x (Corded(x) -> not Snotty(x))\nCheckmate(herrmann, ashly) and not Uniform(ashly, herrmann) -> Corded(herrmann)\n\nConcertise(ashly, herrmann)\n\nforall x (Concertise(x, ashly) -> Concertise(x, herrmann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The nanine islamise the esmaria. The esmaria travel the nanine. If the nanine permeate the esmaria then the esmaria is overblown. If something islamise the nanine then the nanine permeate the esmaria. If something islamise the esmaria then it islamise the nanine. If something permeate the esmaria then the esmaria is not facile. If something islamise the esmaria and the esmaria permeate the nanine then the esmaria travel the nanine. If something is oleaginous and it islamise the esmaria then it does not eat the esmaria. All bendable things are not oleaginous. If the nanine permeate the esmaria and the esmaria does not eat the nanine then the nanine is bendable. The esmaria is not bendable.", "logic": "\nIslamise(nanine, esmaria)\nTravel(esmaria, nanine)\nPermeate(nanine, esmaria) -> Overblown(esmaria)\nforall x (Islamise(x, nanine) -> Permeate(nanine, esmaria))\nforall x (Islamise(x, esmaria) -> Islamise(x, nanine))\nforall x (Permeate(x, esmaria) -> not Facile(esmaria))\nforall x (Islamise(x, esmaria) and Permeate(esmaria, nanine) -> Travel(esmaria, nanine))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and Islamise(x, esmaria) -> not Travel(x, esmaria))\nforall x (Bendable(x) -> not Oleaginous(x))\nPermeate(nanine, esmaria) and not Travel(esmaria, nanine) -> Bendable(nanine)\n\nnot Bendable(esmaria)\n\nnot Bendable(esmaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The shaylyn resorb the clarisse. The clarisse accustom the shaylyn. If the shaylyn turtle the clarisse then the clarisse is cocksure. If something resorb the shaylyn then the shaylyn turtle the clarisse. If something resorb the clarisse then it resorb the shaylyn. If something turtle the clarisse then the clarisse is not sightless. If something resorb the clarisse and the clarisse turtle the shaylyn then the clarisse accustom the shaylyn. If something is unsociable and it resorb the clarisse then it does not eat the clarisse. All majuscular things are not unsociable. If the shaylyn turtle the clarisse and the clarisse does not eat the shaylyn then the shaylyn is majuscular. The shaylyn is unsociable.", "logic": "\nResorb(shaylyn, clarisse)\nAccustom(clarisse, shaylyn)\nTurtle(shaylyn, clarisse) -> Cocksure(clarisse)\nforall x (Resorb(x, shaylyn) -> Turtle(shaylyn, clarisse))\nforall x (Resorb(x, clarisse) -> Resorb(x, shaylyn))\nforall x (Turtle(x, clarisse) -> not Sightless(clarisse))\nforall x (Resorb(x, clarisse) and Turtle(clarisse, shaylyn) -> Accustom(clarisse, shaylyn))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Resorb(x, clarisse) -> not Accustom(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Majuscular(x) -> not Unsociable(x))\nTurtle(shaylyn, clarisse) and not Accustom(clarisse, shaylyn) -> Majuscular(shaylyn)\n\nUnsociable(shaylyn)\n\nUnsociable(shaylyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The gennie refine the anita. The anita reverse the gennie. If the gennie hood the anita then the anita is exocrine. If something refine the gennie then the gennie hood the anita. If something refine the anita then it refine the gennie. If something hood the anita then the anita is not postictal. If something refine the anita and the anita hood the gennie then the anita reverse the gennie. If something is intent and it refine the anita then it does not eat the anita. All overfull things are not intent. If the gennie hood the anita and the anita does not eat the gennie then the gennie is overfull. The anita is not intent.", "logic": "\nRefine(gennie, anita)\nReverse(anita, gennie)\nHood(gennie, anita) -> Exocrine(anita)\nforall x (Refine(x, gennie) -> Hood(gennie, anita))\nforall x (Refine(x, anita) -> Refine(x, gennie))\nforall x (Hood(x, anita) -> not Postictal(anita))\nforall x (Refine(x, anita) and Hood(anita, gennie) -> Reverse(anita, gennie))\nforall x (Intent(x) and Refine(x, anita) -> not Reverse(x, anita))\nforall x (Overfull(x) -> not Intent(x))\nHood(gennie, anita) and not Reverse(anita, gennie) -> Overfull(gennie)\n\nnot Intent(anita)\n\nnot Intent(anita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The nisa apostatise the garcon. The garcon jest the nisa. If the nisa glower the garcon then the garcon is unskilled. If something apostatise the nisa then the nisa glower the garcon. If something apostatise the garcon then it apostatise the nisa. If something glower the garcon then the garcon is not candescent. If something apostatise the garcon and the garcon glower the nisa then the garcon jest the nisa. If something is adaptable and it apostatise the garcon then it does not eat the garcon. All bullheaded things are not adaptable. If the nisa glower the garcon and the garcon does not eat the nisa then the nisa is bullheaded. The nisa is unskilled.", "logic": "\nApostatise(nisa, garcon)\nJest(garcon, nisa)\nGlower(nisa, garcon) -> Unskilled(garcon)\nforall x (Apostatise(x, nisa) -> Glower(nisa, garcon))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, garcon) -> Apostatise(x, nisa))\nforall x (Glower(x, garcon) -> not Candescent(garcon))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, garcon) and Glower(garcon, nisa) -> Jest(garcon, nisa))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) and Apostatise(x, garcon) -> not Jest(x, garcon))\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) -> not Adaptable(x))\nGlower(nisa, garcon) and not Jest(garcon, nisa) -> Bullheaded(nisa)\n\nUnskilled(nisa)\n\nUnskilled(nisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The josephine simulate the marven. The marven spoonfeed the josephine. If the josephine suspect the marven then the marven is lyrical. If something simulate the josephine then the josephine suspect the marven. If something simulate the marven then it simulate the josephine. If something suspect the marven then the marven is not spindly. If something simulate the marven and the marven suspect the josephine then the marven spoonfeed the josephine. If something is spacious and it simulate the marven then it does not eat the marven. All mixed things are not spacious. If the josephine suspect the marven and the marven does not eat the josephine then the josephine is mixed. The josephine does not eat the josephine.", "logic": "\nSimulate(josephine, marven)\nSpoonfeed(marven, josephine)\nSuspect(josephine, marven) -> Lyrical(marven)\nforall x (Simulate(x, josephine) -> Suspect(josephine, marven))\nforall x (Simulate(x, marven) -> Simulate(x, josephine))\nforall x (Suspect(x, marven) -> not Spindly(marven))\nforall x (Simulate(x, marven) and Suspect(marven, josephine) -> Spoonfeed(marven, josephine))\nforall x (Spacious(x) and Simulate(x, marven) -> not Spoonfeed(x, marven))\nforall x (Mixed(x) -> not Spacious(x))\nSuspect(josephine, marven) and not Spoonfeed(marven, josephine) -> Mixed(josephine)\n\nnot Spoonfeed(josephine, josephine)\n\nnot Spoonfeed(josephine, josephine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The prue criminate the penelope. The penelope appear the prue. If the prue cringe the penelope then the penelope is frigorific. If something criminate the prue then the prue cringe the penelope. If something criminate the penelope then it criminate the prue. If something cringe the penelope then the penelope is not penitent. If something criminate the penelope and the penelope cringe the prue then the penelope appear the prue. If something is vacuous and it criminate the penelope then it does not eat the penelope. All erstwhile things are not vacuous. If the prue cringe the penelope and the penelope does not eat the prue then the prue is erstwhile. The penelope criminate the penelope.", "logic": "\nCriminate(prue, penelope)\nAppear(penelope, prue)\nCringe(prue, penelope) -> Frigorific(penelope)\nforall x (Criminate(x, prue) -> Cringe(prue, penelope))\nforall x (Criminate(x, penelope) -> Criminate(x, prue))\nforall x (Cringe(x, penelope) -> not Penitent(penelope))\nforall x (Criminate(x, penelope) and Cringe(penelope, prue) -> Appear(penelope, prue))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Criminate(x, penelope) -> not Appear(x, penelope))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> not Vacuous(x))\nCringe(prue, penelope) and not Appear(penelope, prue) -> Erstwhile(prue)\n\nCriminate(penelope, penelope)\n\nCriminate(penelope, penelope) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "Sky is tyrolean. Sky is polychrome. Sky is aquatic. Sky is terrene. Zoe is polychrome. Zoe is irrelevant. Zoe is aquatic. Robyn is terrene. Millicent is ascendent. Millicent is aquatic. If Zoe is not polychrome then Zoe is not aquatic. All tyrolean, iridic things are aquatic. If something is irrelevant and not iridic then it is aquatic. If something is aquatic and tyrolean then it is terrene. If something is ascendent and irrelevant then it is terrene. If something is terrene and polychrome then it is ascendent. Red things are tyrolean. If Millicent is terrene and Millicent is ascendent then Millicent is tyrolean. Sky is tyrolean.", "logic": "\nTyrolean(sky)\nPolychrome(sky)\nAquatic(sky)\nTerrene(sky)\nPolychrome(zoe)\nIrrelevant(zoe)\nAquatic(zoe)\nTerrene(robyn)\nAscendent(millicent)\nAquatic(millicent)\nnot Polychrome(zoe) -> not Aquatic(zoe)\nforall x (Tyrolean(x) and Iridic(x) -> Aquatic(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) and not Iridic(x) -> Aquatic(x))\nforall x (Aquatic(x) and Tyrolean(x) -> Terrene(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) and Irrelevant(x) -> Terrene(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Polychrome(x) -> Ascendent(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) -> Tyrolean(x))\nTerrene(millicent) and Ascendent(millicent) -> Tyrolean(millicent)\n\nTyrolean(sky)\n\ntherefore Tyrolean(sky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Almeda is anoxic. Almeda is bacteroid. Almeda is located. Almeda is hitless. Caresa is bacteroid. Caresa is toughened. Caresa is located. Albertina is hitless. Virgie is unheralded. Virgie is located. If Caresa is not bacteroid then Caresa is not located. All anoxic, finespun things are located. If something is toughened and not finespun then it is located. If something is located and anoxic then it is hitless. If something is unheralded and toughened then it is hitless. If something is hitless and bacteroid then it is unheralded. Red things are anoxic. If Virgie is hitless and Virgie is unheralded then Virgie is anoxic. Almeda is not anoxic.", "logic": "\nAnoxic(almeda)\nBacteroid(almeda)\nLocated(almeda)\nHitless(almeda)\nBacteroid(caresa)\nToughened(caresa)\nLocated(caresa)\nHitless(albertina)\nUnheralded(virgie)\nLocated(virgie)\nnot Bacteroid(caresa) -> not Located(caresa)\nforall x (Anoxic(x) and Finespun(x) -> Located(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and not Finespun(x) -> Located(x))\nforall x (Located(x) and Anoxic(x) -> Hitless(x))\nforall x (Unheralded(x) and Toughened(x) -> Hitless(x))\nforall x (Hitless(x) and Bacteroid(x) -> Unheralded(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Anoxic(x))\nHitless(virgie) and Unheralded(virgie) -> Anoxic(virgie)\n\nnot Anoxic(almeda)\n\ntherefore Anoxic(almeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Clo is florid. Clo is federal. Clo is postexilic. Clo is lactating. Arlette is federal. Arlette is unionised. Arlette is postexilic. Lust is lactating. Havivah is tetragonal. Havivah is postexilic. If Arlette is not federal then Arlette is not postexilic. All florid, orchestral things are postexilic. If something is unionised and not orchestral then it is postexilic. If something is postexilic and florid then it is lactating. If something is tetragonal and unionised then it is lactating. If something is lactating and federal then it is tetragonal. Red things are florid. If Havivah is lactating and Havivah is tetragonal then Havivah is florid. Arlette is florid.", "logic": "\nFlorid(clo)\nFederal(clo)\nPostexilic(clo)\nLactating(clo)\nFederal(arlette)\nUnionised(arlette)\nPostexilic(arlette)\nLactating(lust)\nTetragonal(havivah)\nPostexilic(havivah)\nnot Federal(arlette) -> not Postexilic(arlette)\nforall x (Florid(x) and Orchestral(x) -> Postexilic(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) and not Orchestral(x) -> Postexilic(x))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) and Florid(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and Unionised(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Lactating(x) and Federal(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) -> Florid(x))\nLactating(havivah) and Tetragonal(havivah) -> Florid(havivah)\n\nFlorid(arlette)\n\nUnionised(arlette) and forall x (Unionised(x) -> Florid(x)) -> therefore Florid(arlette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Correy is patchy. Correy is keyed. Correy is rococo. Correy is icebound. Plato is keyed. Plato is inelegant. Plato is rococo. Gita is icebound. Casey is folding. Casey is rococo. If Plato is not keyed then Plato is not rococo. All patchy, fuddled things are rococo. If something is inelegant and not fuddled then it is rococo. If something is rococo and patchy then it is icebound. If something is folding and inelegant then it is icebound. If something is icebound and keyed then it is folding. Red things are patchy. If Casey is icebound and Casey is folding then Casey is patchy. Plato is not patchy.", "logic": "\nPatchy(correy)\nKeyed(correy)\nRococo(correy)\nIcebound(correy)\nKeyed(plato)\nInelegant(plato)\nRococo(plato)\nIcebound(gita)\nFolding(casey)\nRococo(casey)\nnot Keyed(plato) -> not Rococo(plato)\nforall x (Patchy(x) and Fuddled(x) -> Rococo(x))\nforall x (Inelegant(x) and not Fuddled(x) -> Rococo(x))\nforall x (Rococo(x) and Patchy(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) and Inelegant(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) and Keyed(x) -> Folding(x))\nforall x (Inelegant(x) -> Patchy(x))\nIcebound(casey) and Folding(casey) -> Patchy(casey)\n\nnot Patchy(plato)\n\nInelegant(plato) and forall x (Inelegant(x) -> Patchy(x)) -> therefore Patchy(plato)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Marlee is trivalent. Marlee is tracked. Marlee is quack. Marlee is denatured. Gavrielle is tracked. Gavrielle is abducting. Gavrielle is quack. Ardith is denatured. Gearard is stubbly. Gearard is quack. If Gavrielle is not tracked then Gavrielle is not quack. All trivalent, sensory things are quack. If something is abducting and not sensory then it is quack. If something is quack and trivalent then it is denatured. If something is stubbly and abducting then it is denatured. If something is denatured and tracked then it is stubbly. Red things are trivalent. If Gearard is denatured and Gearard is stubbly then Gearard is trivalent. Gavrielle is denatured.", "logic": "\nTrivalent(marlee)\nTracked(marlee)\nQuack(marlee)\nDenatured(marlee)\nTracked(gavrielle)\nAbducting(gavrielle)\nQuack(gavrielle)\nDenatured(ardith)\nStubbly(gearard)\nQuack(gearard)\nnot Tracked(gavrielle) -> not Quack(gavrielle)\nforall x (Trivalent(x) and Sensory(x) -> Quack(x))\nforall x (Abducting(x) and not Sensory(x) -> Quack(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) and Trivalent(x) -> Denatured(x))\nforall x (Stubbly(x) and Abducting(x) -> Denatured(x))\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Tracked(x) -> Stubbly(x))\nforall x (Abducting(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nDenatured(gearard) and Stubbly(gearard) -> Trivalent(gearard)\n\nDenatured(gavrielle)\n\nAbducting(gavrielle) and forall x (Abducting(x) -> Trivalent(x)) -> therefore Trivalent(gavrielle) Quack(gavrielle) and Trivalent(gavrielle) and forall x (Quack(x) and Trivalent(x) -> Denatured(x)) -> therefore Denatured(gavrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Annalyse is precedent. Annalyse is unaddicted. Annalyse is crookback. Annalyse is agnate. Nerta is unaddicted. Nerta is executive. Nerta is crookback. Catherina is agnate. Fonz is tight. Fonz is crookback. If Nerta is not unaddicted then Nerta is not crookback. All precedent, lxxxiv things are crookback. If something is executive and not lxxxiv then it is crookback. If something is crookback and precedent then it is agnate. If something is tight and executive then it is agnate. If something is agnate and unaddicted then it is tight. Red things are precedent. If Fonz is agnate and Fonz is tight then Fonz is precedent. Nerta is not agnate.", "logic": "\nPrecedent(annalyse)\nUnaddicted(annalyse)\nCrookback(annalyse)\nAgnate(annalyse)\nUnaddicted(nerta)\nExecutive(nerta)\nCrookback(nerta)\nAgnate(catherina)\nTight(fonz)\nCrookback(fonz)\nnot Unaddicted(nerta) -> not Crookback(nerta)\nforall x (Precedent(x) and Lxxxiv(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) and not Lxxxiv(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) and Precedent(x) -> Agnate(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and Executive(x) -> Agnate(x))\nforall x (Agnate(x) and Unaddicted(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) -> Precedent(x))\nAgnate(fonz) and Tight(fonz) -> Precedent(fonz)\n\nnot Agnate(nerta)\n\nExecutive(nerta) and forall x (Executive(x) -> Precedent(x)) -> therefore Precedent(nerta) Crookback(nerta) and Precedent(nerta) and forall x (Crookback(x) and Precedent(x) -> Agnate(x)) -> therefore Agnate(nerta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Alana is gripping. Alana is intermural. Alana is oldish. Alana is monaural. Esther is intermural. Esther is aeonian. Esther is oldish. Merrily is monaural. Adlai is arced. Adlai is oldish. If Esther is not intermural then Esther is not oldish. All gripping, gimcrack things are oldish. If something is aeonian and not gimcrack then it is oldish. If something is oldish and gripping then it is monaural. If something is arced and aeonian then it is monaural. If something is monaural and intermural then it is arced. Red things are gripping. If Adlai is monaural and Adlai is arced then Adlai is gripping. Esther is arced.", "logic": "\nGripping(alana)\nIntermural(alana)\nOldish(alana)\nMonaural(alana)\nIntermural(esther)\nAeonian(esther)\nOldish(esther)\nMonaural(merrily)\nArced(adlai)\nOldish(adlai)\nnot Intermural(esther) -> not Oldish(esther)\nforall x (Gripping(x) and Gimcrack(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Aeonian(x) and not Gimcrack(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) and Gripping(x) -> Monaural(x))\nforall x (Arced(x) and Aeonian(x) -> Monaural(x))\nforall x (Monaural(x) and Intermural(x) -> Arced(x))\nforall x (Aeonian(x) -> Gripping(x))\nMonaural(adlai) and Arced(adlai) -> Gripping(adlai)\n\nArced(esther)\n\nAeonian(esther) and forall x (Aeonian(x) -> Gripping(x)) -> therefore Gripping(esther) Oldish(esther) and Gripping(esther) and forall x (Oldish(x) and Gripping(x) -> Monaural(x)) -> therefore Monaural(esther) Monaural(esther) and Intermural(esther) and forall x (Monaural(x) and Intermural(x) -> Arced(x)) -> therefore Arced(esther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Reyna is chinless. Reyna is winded. Reyna is bootless. Reyna is cyprian. Corby is winded. Corby is rubbery. Corby is bootless. Nana is cyprian. Raquela is cutting. Raquela is bootless. If Corby is not winded then Corby is not bootless. All chinless, aquiferous things are bootless. If something is rubbery and not aquiferous then it is bootless. If something is bootless and chinless then it is cyprian. If something is cutting and rubbery then it is cyprian. If something is cyprian and winded then it is cutting. Red things are chinless. If Raquela is cyprian and Raquela is cutting then Raquela is chinless. Corby is not cutting.", "logic": "\nChinless(reyna)\nWinded(reyna)\nBootless(reyna)\nCyprian(reyna)\nWinded(corby)\nRubbery(corby)\nBootless(corby)\nCyprian(nana)\nCutting(raquela)\nBootless(raquela)\nnot Winded(corby) -> not Bootless(corby)\nforall x (Chinless(x) and Aquiferous(x) -> Bootless(x))\nforall x (Rubbery(x) and not Aquiferous(x) -> Bootless(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Chinless(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) and Rubbery(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) and Winded(x) -> Cutting(x))\nforall x (Rubbery(x) -> Chinless(x))\nCyprian(raquela) and Cutting(raquela) -> Chinless(raquela)\n\nnot Cutting(corby)\n\nRubbery(corby) and forall x (Rubbery(x) -> Chinless(x)) -> therefore Chinless(corby) Bootless(corby) and Chinless(corby) and forall x (Bootless(x) and Chinless(x) -> Cyprian(x)) -> therefore Cyprian(corby) Cyprian(corby) and Winded(corby) and forall x (Cyprian(x) and Winded(x) -> Cutting(x)) -> therefore Cutting(corby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "August is prayerful. August is nethermost. August is overheated. August is unseen. Dafna is nethermost. Dafna is unrigged. Dafna is overheated. Celine is unseen. Joannes is wheaten. Joannes is overheated. If Dafna is not nethermost then Dafna is not overheated. All prayerful, alary things are overheated. If something is unrigged and not alary then it is overheated. If something is overheated and prayerful then it is unseen. If something is wheaten and unrigged then it is unseen. If something is unseen and nethermost then it is wheaten. Red things are prayerful. If Joannes is unseen and Joannes is wheaten then Joannes is prayerful. Celine is not wheaten.", "logic": "\nPrayerful(august)\nNethermost(august)\nOverheated(august)\nUnseen(august)\nNethermost(dafna)\nUnrigged(dafna)\nOverheated(dafna)\nUnseen(celine)\nWheaten(joannes)\nOverheated(joannes)\nnot Nethermost(dafna) -> not Overheated(dafna)\nforall x (Prayerful(x) and Alary(x) -> Overheated(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) and not Alary(x) -> Overheated(x))\nforall x (Overheated(x) and Prayerful(x) -> Unseen(x))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) and Unrigged(x) -> Unseen(x))\nforall x (Unseen(x) and Nethermost(x) -> Wheaten(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) -> Prayerful(x))\nUnseen(joannes) and Wheaten(joannes) -> Prayerful(joannes)\n\nnot Wheaten(celine)\n\nforall x (Unseen(x) and Nethermost(x) -> Wheaten(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Juliet is receding. Juliet is atrial. Juliet is doubtful. Juliet is residual. Francis is atrial. Francis is exterior. Francis is doubtful. Sonnie is residual. Merell is cotyloid. Merell is doubtful. If Francis is not atrial then Francis is not doubtful. All receding, ductile things are doubtful. If something is exterior and not ductile then it is doubtful. If something is doubtful and receding then it is residual. If something is cotyloid and exterior then it is residual. If something is residual and atrial then it is cotyloid. Red things are receding. If Merell is residual and Merell is cotyloid then Merell is receding. Merell is receding.", "logic": "\nReceding(juliet)\nAtrial(juliet)\nDoubtful(juliet)\nResidual(juliet)\nAtrial(francis)\nExterior(francis)\nDoubtful(francis)\nResidual(sonnie)\nCotyloid(merell)\nDoubtful(merell)\nnot Atrial(francis) -> not Doubtful(francis)\nforall x (Receding(x) and Ductile(x) -> Doubtful(x))\nforall x (Exterior(x) and not Ductile(x) -> Doubtful(x))\nforall x (Doubtful(x) and Receding(x) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) and Exterior(x) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Residual(x) and Atrial(x) -> Cotyloid(x))\nforall x (Exterior(x) -> Receding(x))\nResidual(merell) and Cotyloid(merell) -> Receding(merell)\n\nReceding(merell)\n\nResidual(merell) and Cotyloid(merell) -> Receding(merell) <- forall x (Doubtful(x) and Receding(x) -> Residual(x)) <- forall x (Exterior(x) -> Receding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Damian is worldwide. Damian is thickening. Damian is hostile. Damian is isolated. Ethelda is thickening. Ethelda is gossamer. Ethelda is hostile. Bengt is isolated. Bella is cinerary. Bella is hostile. If Ethelda is not thickening then Ethelda is not hostile. All worldwide, myoid things are hostile. If something is gossamer and not myoid then it is hostile. If something is hostile and worldwide then it is isolated. If something is cinerary and gossamer then it is isolated. If something is isolated and thickening then it is cinerary. Red things are worldwide. If Bella is isolated and Bella is cinerary then Bella is worldwide. Bella is not isolated.", "logic": "\nWorldwide(damian)\nThickening(damian)\nHostile(damian)\nIsolated(damian)\nThickening(ethelda)\nGossamer(ethelda)\nHostile(ethelda)\nIsolated(bengt)\nCinerary(bella)\nHostile(bella)\nnot Thickening(ethelda) -> not Hostile(ethelda)\nforall x (Worldwide(x) and Myoid(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Gossamer(x) and not Myoid(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) and Worldwide(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) and Gossamer(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Isolated(x) and Thickening(x) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Gossamer(x) -> Worldwide(x))\nIsolated(bella) and Cinerary(bella) -> Worldwide(bella)\n\nnot Isolated(bella)\n\nforall x (Hostile(x) and Worldwide(x) -> Isolated(x)) <- Isolated(bella) and Cinerary(bella) -> Worldwide(bella) <- forall x (Cinerary(x) and Gossamer(x) -> Isolated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Ric is indicative. Ric is breezy. Ric is singular. Ric is attested. Tynan is breezy. Tynan is fumed. Tynan is singular. Delores is attested. Rudolfo is casual. Rudolfo is singular. If Tynan is not breezy then Tynan is not singular. All indicative, immotile things are singular. If something is fumed and not immotile then it is singular. If something is singular and indicative then it is attested. If something is casual and fumed then it is attested. If something is attested and breezy then it is casual. Red things are indicative. If Rudolfo is attested and Rudolfo is casual then Rudolfo is indicative. Delores is singular.", "logic": "\nIndicative(ric)\nBreezy(ric)\nSingular(ric)\nAttested(ric)\nBreezy(tynan)\nFumed(tynan)\nSingular(tynan)\nAttested(delores)\nCasual(rudolfo)\nSingular(rudolfo)\nnot Breezy(tynan) -> not Singular(tynan)\nforall x (Indicative(x) and Immotile(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Fumed(x) and not Immotile(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) and Indicative(x) -> Attested(x))\nforall x (Casual(x) and Fumed(x) -> Attested(x))\nforall x (Attested(x) and Breezy(x) -> Casual(x))\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Indicative(x))\nAttested(rudolfo) and Casual(rudolfo) -> Indicative(rudolfo)\n\nSingular(delores)\n\nforall x (Indicative(x) and Immotile(x) -> Singular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Margie is statant. Margie is wondering. Margie is rupestral. Margie is onymous. Tallie is wondering. Tallie is raunchy. Tallie is rupestral. Carie is onymous. Quinlan is adverbial. Quinlan is rupestral. If Tallie is not wondering then Tallie is not rupestral. All statant, alabaster things are rupestral. If something is raunchy and not alabaster then it is rupestral. If something is rupestral and statant then it is onymous. If something is adverbial and raunchy then it is onymous. If something is onymous and wondering then it is adverbial. Red things are statant. If Quinlan is onymous and Quinlan is adverbial then Quinlan is statant. Carie is not alabaster.", "logic": "\nStatant(margie)\nWondering(margie)\nRupestral(margie)\nOnymous(margie)\nWondering(tallie)\nRaunchy(tallie)\nRupestral(tallie)\nOnymous(carie)\nAdverbial(quinlan)\nRupestral(quinlan)\nnot Wondering(tallie) -> not Rupestral(tallie)\nforall x (Statant(x) and Alabaster(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) and not Alabaster(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Rupestral(x) and Statant(x) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Adverbial(x) and Raunchy(x) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Onymous(x) and Wondering(x) -> Adverbial(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Statant(x))\nOnymous(quinlan) and Adverbial(quinlan) -> Statant(quinlan)\n\nnot Alabaster(carie)\n\nnot Alabaster(carie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Eydie is tinselly. Eydie is outdoorsy. Eydie is fastigiate. Eydie is tenable. Alston is outdoorsy. Alston is emotional. Alston is fastigiate. Auria is tenable. Kacie is bumpkinly. Kacie is fastigiate. If Alston is not outdoorsy then Alston is not fastigiate. All tinselly, stellate things are fastigiate. If something is emotional and not stellate then it is fastigiate. If something is fastigiate and tinselly then it is tenable. If something is bumpkinly and emotional then it is tenable. If something is tenable and outdoorsy then it is bumpkinly. Red things are tinselly. If Kacie is tenable and Kacie is bumpkinly then Kacie is tinselly. Eydie is emotional.", "logic": "\nTinselly(eydie)\nOutdoorsy(eydie)\nFastigiate(eydie)\nTenable(eydie)\nOutdoorsy(alston)\nEmotional(alston)\nFastigiate(alston)\nTenable(auria)\nBumpkinly(kacie)\nFastigiate(kacie)\nnot Outdoorsy(alston) -> not Fastigiate(alston)\nforall x (Tinselly(x) and Stellate(x) -> Fastigiate(x))\nforall x (Emotional(x) and not Stellate(x) -> Fastigiate(x))\nforall x (Fastigiate(x) and Tinselly(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) and Emotional(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) and Outdoorsy(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Emotional(x) -> Tinselly(x))\nTenable(kacie) and Bumpkinly(kacie) -> Tinselly(kacie)\n\nEmotional(eydie)\n\nEmotional(eydie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Isobel is geographic. Isobel is random. Isobel is bracted. Isobel is sectional. Zuzana is random. Zuzana is instinct. Zuzana is bracted. Don is sectional. Ivan is unsaid. Ivan is bracted. If Zuzana is not random then Zuzana is not bracted. All geographic, bimonthly things are bracted. If something is instinct and not bimonthly then it is bracted. If something is bracted and geographic then it is sectional. If something is unsaid and instinct then it is sectional. If something is sectional and random then it is unsaid. Red things are geographic. If Ivan is sectional and Ivan is unsaid then Ivan is geographic. Zuzana is not bimonthly.", "logic": "\nGeographic(isobel)\nRandom(isobel)\nBracted(isobel)\nSectional(isobel)\nRandom(zuzana)\nInstinct(zuzana)\nBracted(zuzana)\nSectional(don)\nUnsaid(ivan)\nBracted(ivan)\nnot Random(zuzana) -> not Bracted(zuzana)\nforall x (Geographic(x) and Bimonthly(x) -> Bracted(x))\nforall x (Instinct(x) and not Bimonthly(x) -> Bracted(x))\nforall x (Bracted(x) and Geographic(x) -> Sectional(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) and Instinct(x) -> Sectional(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) and Random(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Instinct(x) -> Geographic(x))\nSectional(ivan) and Unsaid(ivan) -> Geographic(ivan)\n\nnot Bimonthly(zuzana)\n\nnot Bimonthly(zuzana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Hymie is wholesale. Hymie is overnice. Hymie is admirable. Hymie is bootleg. Julina is overnice. Julina is underage. Julina is admirable. Charisse is bootleg. Cherise is intense. Cherise is admirable. If Julina is not overnice then Julina is not admirable. All wholesale, bushed things are admirable. If something is underage and not bushed then it is admirable. If something is admirable and wholesale then it is bootleg. If something is intense and underage then it is bootleg. If something is bootleg and overnice then it is intense. Red things are wholesale. If Cherise is bootleg and Cherise is intense then Cherise is wholesale. Cherise is overnice.", "logic": "\nWholesale(hymie)\nOvernice(hymie)\nAdmirable(hymie)\nBootleg(hymie)\nOvernice(julina)\nUnderage(julina)\nAdmirable(julina)\nBootleg(charisse)\nIntense(cherise)\nAdmirable(cherise)\nnot Overnice(julina) -> not Admirable(julina)\nforall x (Wholesale(x) and Bushed(x) -> Admirable(x))\nforall x (Underage(x) and not Bushed(x) -> Admirable(x))\nforall x (Admirable(x) and Wholesale(x) -> Bootleg(x))\nforall x (Intense(x) and Underage(x) -> Bootleg(x))\nforall x (Bootleg(x) and Overnice(x) -> Intense(x))\nforall x (Underage(x) -> Wholesale(x))\nBootleg(cherise) and Intense(cherise) -> Wholesale(cherise)\n\nOvernice(cherise)\n\nOvernice(cherise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Mariel is shelflike. Mariel is braless. Leshia is shelflike. Leshia is not braless. Leshia is opencut. Leshia is alarmed. Bobbi is braless. Bobbi is alarmed. Bobbi is sidereal. Cheslie is magical. Cheslie is shelflike. Cheslie is opencut. Furry things are sidereal. All braless things are sidereal. All opencut things are summary. All opencut things are summary. All magical things are summary. All sidereal things are magical. Leshia is not braless.", "logic": "\nShelflike(mariel)\nBraless(mariel)\nShelflike(leshia)\nnot Braless(leshia)\nOpencut(leshia)\nAlarmed(leshia)\nBraless(bobbi)\nAlarmed(bobbi)\nSidereal(bobbi)\nMagical(cheslie)\nShelflike(cheslie)\nOpencut(cheslie)\nforall x (Braless(x) -> Sidereal(x))\nforall x (Braless(x) -> Sidereal(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> Summary(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> Summary(x))\nforall x (Magical(x) -> Summary(x))\nforall x (Sidereal(x) -> Magical(x))\n\nnot Braless(leshia)\n\ntherefore not Braless(leshia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Tomiko is fetid. Tomiko is disgustful. Fredrick is fetid. Fredrick is not disgustful. Fredrick is bragging. Fredrick is legion. Teodorico is disgustful. Teodorico is legion. Teodorico is embossed. Nick is unopposed. Nick is fetid. Nick is bragging. Furry things are embossed. All disgustful things are embossed. All bragging things are ceylonese. All bragging things are ceylonese. All unopposed things are ceylonese. All embossed things are unopposed. Fredrick is not bragging.", "logic": "\nFetid(tomiko)\nDisgustful(tomiko)\nFetid(fredrick)\nnot Disgustful(fredrick)\nBragging(fredrick)\nLegion(fredrick)\nDisgustful(teodorico)\nLegion(teodorico)\nEmbossed(teodorico)\nUnopposed(nick)\nFetid(nick)\nBragging(nick)\nforall x (Disgustful(x) -> Embossed(x))\nforall x (Disgustful(x) -> Embossed(x))\nforall x (Bragging(x) -> Ceylonese(x))\nforall x (Bragging(x) -> Ceylonese(x))\nforall x (Unopposed(x) -> Ceylonese(x))\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Unopposed(x))\n\nnot Bragging(fredrick)\n\ntherefore Bragging(fredrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Lucius is outspoken. Lucius is congestive. Gwendolin is outspoken. Gwendolin is not congestive. Gwendolin is superlunar. Gwendolin is damning. Gusti is congestive. Gusti is damning. Gusti is prankish. Thorsten is orwellian. Thorsten is outspoken. Thorsten is superlunar. Furry things are prankish. All congestive things are prankish. All superlunar things are antepartum. All superlunar things are antepartum. All orwellian things are antepartum. All prankish things are orwellian. Gwendolin is antepartum.", "logic": "\nOutspoken(lucius)\nCongestive(lucius)\nOutspoken(gwendolin)\nnot Congestive(gwendolin)\nSuperlunar(gwendolin)\nDamning(gwendolin)\nCongestive(gusti)\nDamning(gusti)\nPrankish(gusti)\nOrwellian(thorsten)\nOutspoken(thorsten)\nSuperlunar(thorsten)\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Prankish(x))\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Prankish(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Orwellian(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Prankish(x) -> Orwellian(x))\n\nAntepartum(gwendolin)\n\nSuperlunar(gwendolin) and forall x (Superlunar(x) -> Antepartum(x)) -> therefore Antepartum(gwendolin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Myrta is wide. Myrta is pubic. Rhea is wide. Rhea is not pubic. Rhea is pubic. Rhea is adaptable. Katheryn is pubic. Katheryn is adaptable. Katheryn is pernickety. Rubi is infantile. Rubi is wide. Rubi is pubic. Furry things are pernickety. All pubic things are pernickety. All pubic things are rotted. All pubic things are rotted. All infantile things are rotted. All pernickety things are infantile. Myrta is not pernickety.", "logic": "\nWide(myrta)\nPubic(myrta)\nWide(rhea)\nnot Pubic(rhea)\nPubic(rhea)\nAdaptable(rhea)\nPubic(katheryn)\nAdaptable(katheryn)\nPernickety(katheryn)\nInfantile(rubi)\nWide(rubi)\nPubic(rubi)\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Pernickety(x))\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Pernickety(x))\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Infantile(x) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Pernickety(x) -> Infantile(x))\n\nnot Pernickety(myrta)\n\nPubic(myrta) and forall x (Pubic(x) -> Pernickety(x)) -> therefore Pernickety(myrta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Cammi is repeatable. Cammi is revered. Marcela is repeatable. Marcela is not revered. Marcela is pantheist. Marcela is ultimate. Ira is revered. Ira is ultimate. Ira is stabbing. Adrick is contrite. Adrick is repeatable. Adrick is pantheist. Furry things are stabbing. All revered things are stabbing. All pantheist things are quarterly. All pantheist things are quarterly. All contrite things are quarterly. All stabbing things are contrite. Cammi is contrite.", "logic": "\nRepeatable(cammi)\nRevered(cammi)\nRepeatable(marcela)\nnot Revered(marcela)\nPantheist(marcela)\nUltimate(marcela)\nRevered(ira)\nUltimate(ira)\nStabbing(ira)\nContrite(adrick)\nRepeatable(adrick)\nPantheist(adrick)\nforall x (Revered(x) -> Stabbing(x))\nforall x (Revered(x) -> Stabbing(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Contrite(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Stabbing(x) -> Contrite(x))\n\nContrite(cammi)\n\nRevered(cammi) and forall x (Revered(x) -> Stabbing(x)) -> therefore Stabbing(cammi) Stabbing(cammi) and forall x (Stabbing(x) -> Contrite(x)) -> therefore Contrite(cammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Pablo is unexcelled. Pablo is threefold. Quill is unexcelled. Quill is not threefold. Quill is mirrorlike. Quill is capsular. Austine is threefold. Austine is capsular. Austine is fistulous. Putnam is potholed. Putnam is unexcelled. Putnam is mirrorlike. Furry things are fistulous. All threefold things are fistulous. All mirrorlike things are ageless. All mirrorlike things are ageless. All potholed things are ageless. All fistulous things are potholed. Pablo is not potholed.", "logic": "\nUnexcelled(pablo)\nThreefold(pablo)\nUnexcelled(quill)\nnot Threefold(quill)\nMirrorlike(quill)\nCapsular(quill)\nThreefold(austine)\nCapsular(austine)\nFistulous(austine)\nPotholed(putnam)\nUnexcelled(putnam)\nMirrorlike(putnam)\nforall x (Threefold(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Threefold(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Mirrorlike(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Mirrorlike(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Potholed(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) -> Potholed(x))\n\nnot Potholed(pablo)\n\nThreefold(pablo) and forall x (Threefold(x) -> Fistulous(x)) -> therefore Fistulous(pablo) Fistulous(pablo) and forall x (Fistulous(x) -> Potholed(x)) -> therefore Potholed(pablo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Alidia is moderato. Alidia is hypnotised. Winnifred is moderato. Winnifred is not hypnotised. Winnifred is grovelling. Winnifred is granitic. Xever is hypnotised. Xever is granitic. Xever is indian. Price is sudorific. Price is moderato. Price is grovelling. Furry things are indian. All hypnotised things are indian. All grovelling things are twee. All grovelling things are twee. All sudorific things are twee. All indian things are sudorific. Alidia is twee.", "logic": "\nModerato(alidia)\nHypnotised(alidia)\nModerato(winnifred)\nnot Hypnotised(winnifred)\nGrovelling(winnifred)\nGranitic(winnifred)\nHypnotised(xever)\nGranitic(xever)\nIndian(xever)\nSudorific(price)\nModerato(price)\nGrovelling(price)\nforall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Indian(x))\nforall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Indian(x))\nforall x (Grovelling(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Grovelling(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Sudorific(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Indian(x) -> Sudorific(x))\n\nTwee(alidia)\n\nHypnotised(alidia) and forall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Indian(x)) -> therefore Indian(alidia) Indian(alidia) and forall x (Indian(x) -> Sudorific(x)) -> therefore Sudorific(alidia) Sudorific(alidia) and forall x (Sudorific(x) -> Twee(x)) -> therefore Twee(alidia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Lyndell is univalve. Lyndell is cusped. Krystyna is univalve. Krystyna is not cusped. Krystyna is latticed. Krystyna is subliminal. Nonah is cusped. Nonah is subliminal. Nonah is avaricious. Murdock is weak. Murdock is univalve. Murdock is latticed. Furry things are avaricious. All cusped things are avaricious. All latticed things are handwoven. All latticed things are handwoven. All weak things are handwoven. All avaricious things are weak. Lyndell is not handwoven.", "logic": "\nUnivalve(lyndell)\nCusped(lyndell)\nUnivalve(krystyna)\nnot Cusped(krystyna)\nLatticed(krystyna)\nSubliminal(krystyna)\nCusped(nonah)\nSubliminal(nonah)\nAvaricious(nonah)\nWeak(murdock)\nUnivalve(murdock)\nLatticed(murdock)\nforall x (Cusped(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nforall x (Cusped(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nforall x (Latticed(x) -> Handwoven(x))\nforall x (Latticed(x) -> Handwoven(x))\nforall x (Weak(x) -> Handwoven(x))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Weak(x))\n\nnot Handwoven(lyndell)\n\nCusped(lyndell) and forall x (Cusped(x) -> Avaricious(x)) -> therefore Avaricious(lyndell) Avaricious(lyndell) and forall x (Avaricious(x) -> Weak(x)) -> therefore Weak(lyndell) Weak(lyndell) and forall x (Weak(x) -> Handwoven(x)) -> therefore Handwoven(lyndell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Fidel is voguish. Fidel is parisian. Dyana is voguish. Dyana is not parisian. Dyana is fifth. Dyana is energetic. Bryn is parisian. Bryn is energetic. Bryn is unaddicted. Lem is diaphyseal. Lem is voguish. Lem is fifth. Furry things are unaddicted. All parisian things are unaddicted. All fifth things are fatal. All fifth things are fatal. All diaphyseal things are fatal. All unaddicted things are diaphyseal. Lem is not unaddicted.", "logic": "\nVoguish(fidel)\nParisian(fidel)\nVoguish(dyana)\nnot Parisian(dyana)\nFifth(dyana)\nEnergetic(dyana)\nParisian(bryn)\nEnergetic(bryn)\nUnaddicted(bryn)\nDiaphyseal(lem)\nVoguish(lem)\nFifth(lem)\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Fifth(x) -> Fatal(x))\nforall x (Fifth(x) -> Fatal(x))\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) -> Fatal(x))\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) -> Diaphyseal(x))\n\nnot Unaddicted(lem)\n\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Unaddicted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Antonie is faecal. Antonie is sugared. Damon is faecal. Damon is not sugared. Damon is paediatric. Damon is endowed. Rorie is sugared. Rorie is endowed. Rorie is apodal. Rufe is austral. Rufe is faecal. Rufe is paediatric. Furry things are apodal. All sugared things are apodal. All paediatric things are choky. All paediatric things are choky. All austral things are choky. All apodal things are austral. Damon is apodal.", "logic": "\nFaecal(antonie)\nSugared(antonie)\nFaecal(damon)\nnot Sugared(damon)\nPaediatric(damon)\nEndowed(damon)\nSugared(rorie)\nEndowed(rorie)\nApodal(rorie)\nAustral(rufe)\nFaecal(rufe)\nPaediatric(rufe)\nforall x (Sugared(x) -> Apodal(x))\nforall x (Sugared(x) -> Apodal(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) -> Choky(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) -> Choky(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Choky(x))\nforall x (Apodal(x) -> Austral(x))\n\nApodal(damon)\n\nforall x (Sugared(x) -> Apodal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Evette is awry. Evette is undershot. Gerrit is awry. Gerrit is not undershot. Gerrit is fighting. Gerrit is debonair. Karlotta is undershot. Karlotta is debonair. Karlotta is lovelorn. Justin is leguminous. Justin is awry. Justin is fighting. Furry things are lovelorn. All undershot things are lovelorn. All fighting things are phonemic. All fighting things are phonemic. All leguminous things are phonemic. All lovelorn things are leguminous. Gerrit is not leguminous.", "logic": "\nAwry(evette)\nUndershot(evette)\nAwry(gerrit)\nnot Undershot(gerrit)\nFighting(gerrit)\nDebonair(gerrit)\nUndershot(karlotta)\nDebonair(karlotta)\nLovelorn(karlotta)\nLeguminous(justin)\nAwry(justin)\nFighting(justin)\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Leguminous(x) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Leguminous(x))\n\nnot Leguminous(gerrit)\n\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Leguminous(x)) <- forall x (Undershot(x) -> Lovelorn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Mandie is monarchal. Mandie is stripy. Hasty is monarchal. Hasty is not stripy. Hasty is alchemical. Hasty is beneficed. Skelly is stripy. Skelly is beneficed. Skelly is glabellar. Elwin is wireless. Elwin is monarchal. Elwin is alchemical. Furry things are glabellar. All stripy things are glabellar. All alchemical things are dishonored. All alchemical things are dishonored. All wireless things are dishonored. All glabellar things are wireless. Mandie is beneficed.", "logic": "\nMonarchal(mandie)\nStripy(mandie)\nMonarchal(hasty)\nnot Stripy(hasty)\nAlchemical(hasty)\nBeneficed(hasty)\nStripy(skelly)\nBeneficed(skelly)\nGlabellar(skelly)\nWireless(elwin)\nMonarchal(elwin)\nAlchemical(elwin)\nforall x (Stripy(x) -> Glabellar(x))\nforall x (Stripy(x) -> Glabellar(x))\nforall x (Alchemical(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Alchemical(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Glabellar(x) -> Wireless(x))\n\nBeneficed(mandie)\n\nBeneficed(mandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Madona is crowning. Madona is frozen. Florice is crowning. Florice is not frozen. Florice is autocratic. Florice is acapnic. Rianon is frozen. Rianon is acapnic. Rianon is wound. Sheffy is bended. Sheffy is crowning. Sheffy is autocratic. Furry things are wound. All frozen things are wound. All autocratic things are bicyclic. All autocratic things are bicyclic. All bended things are bicyclic. All wound things are bended. Rianon is not autocratic.", "logic": "\nCrowning(madona)\nFrozen(madona)\nCrowning(florice)\nnot Frozen(florice)\nAutocratic(florice)\nAcapnic(florice)\nFrozen(rianon)\nAcapnic(rianon)\nWound(rianon)\nBended(sheffy)\nCrowning(sheffy)\nAutocratic(sheffy)\nforall x (Frozen(x) -> Wound(x))\nforall x (Frozen(x) -> Wound(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Bended(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Bended(x))\n\nnot Autocratic(rianon)\n\nnot Autocratic(rianon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Binnie is brief. Binnie is emboldened. Eddie is brief. Eddie is not emboldened. Eddie is asteriated. Eddie is remorseful. Cammy is emboldened. Cammy is remorseful. Cammy is succinct. Luna is scapular. Luna is brief. Luna is asteriated. Furry things are succinct. All emboldened things are succinct. All asteriated things are unuseable. All asteriated things are unuseable. All scapular things are unuseable. All succinct things are scapular. Cammy is brief.", "logic": "\nBrief(binnie)\nEmboldened(binnie)\nBrief(eddie)\nnot Emboldened(eddie)\nAsteriated(eddie)\nRemorseful(eddie)\nEmboldened(cammy)\nRemorseful(cammy)\nSuccinct(cammy)\nScapular(luna)\nBrief(luna)\nAsteriated(luna)\nforall x (Emboldened(x) -> Succinct(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) -> Succinct(x))\nforall x (Asteriated(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Asteriated(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Scapular(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Scapular(x))\n\nBrief(cammy)\n\nBrief(cammy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Eleanora is brief. Eleanora is radical. Pinchas is brief. Pinchas is not radical. Pinchas is unglazed. Pinchas is netlike. Mick is radical. Mick is netlike. Mick is worn. Ace is vigilant. Ace is brief. Ace is unglazed. Furry things are worn. All radical things are worn. All unglazed things are languid. All unglazed things are languid. All vigilant things are languid. All worn things are vigilant. Ace is not netlike.", "logic": "\nBrief(eleanora)\nRadical(eleanora)\nBrief(pinchas)\nnot Radical(pinchas)\nUnglazed(pinchas)\nNetlike(pinchas)\nRadical(mick)\nNetlike(mick)\nWorn(mick)\nVigilant(ace)\nBrief(ace)\nUnglazed(ace)\nforall x (Radical(x) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Radical(x) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Unglazed(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Unglazed(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Vigilant(x))\n\nnot Netlike(ace)\n\nnot Netlike(ace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Gordan is crabbed. Gordan is scrivened. Ada is crabbed. Ada is not scrivened. Ada is joint. Ada is heard. Jeralee is scrivened. Jeralee is heard. Jeralee is dreamlike. Orbadiah is unmanned. Orbadiah is crabbed. Orbadiah is joint. Furry things are dreamlike. All scrivened things are dreamlike. All joint things are increasing. All joint things are increasing. All unmanned things are increasing. All dreamlike things are unmanned. Orbadiah is scrivened.", "logic": "\nCrabbed(gordan)\nScrivened(gordan)\nCrabbed(ada)\nnot Scrivened(ada)\nJoint(ada)\nHeard(ada)\nScrivened(jeralee)\nHeard(jeralee)\nDreamlike(jeralee)\nUnmanned(orbadiah)\nCrabbed(orbadiah)\nJoint(orbadiah)\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Dreamlike(x))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Dreamlike(x))\nforall x (Joint(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Joint(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Unmanned(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Dreamlike(x) -> Unmanned(x))\n\nScrivened(orbadiah)\n\nScrivened(orbadiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Annamaria is uncharged. Harris is downward. Rodge is protected. Green people are hazardous. If someone is ambient and uncharged then they are downward. If someone is hazardous then they are downward. Cold, downward people are ambient. All sticky people are ambient. All sticky people are not uncharged. All sticky people are yearlong. Smart, hazardous people are not yearlong. Harris is downward.", "logic": "\nUncharged(annamaria)\nDownward(harris)\nProtected(rodge)\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Hazardous(x))\nforall x (Ambient(x) and Uncharged(x) -> Downward(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) -> Downward(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) and Downward(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> not Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> Yearlong(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) and Hazardous(x) -> not Yearlong(x))\n\nDownward(harris)\n\ntherefore Downward(harris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Randie is noxious. Joyous is cragged. Wilona is worrying. Green people are countywide. If someone is vaporized and noxious then they are cragged. If someone is countywide then they are cragged. Cold, cragged people are vaporized. All hindmost people are vaporized. All hindmost people are not noxious. All hindmost people are unbeholden. Smart, countywide people are not unbeholden. Joyous is not cragged.", "logic": "\nNoxious(randie)\nCragged(joyous)\nWorrying(wilona)\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Countywide(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and Noxious(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Countywide(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Countywide(x) and Cragged(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) -> not Noxious(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) -> Unbeholden(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) and Countywide(x) -> not Unbeholden(x))\n\nnot Cragged(joyous)\n\ntherefore Cragged(joyous)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Odelinda is metallike. Mable is magenta. Antonius is protruding. Green people are warty. If someone is transeunt and metallike then they are magenta. If someone is warty then they are magenta. Cold, magenta people are transeunt. All trained people are transeunt. All trained people are not metallike. All trained people are invertible. Smart, warty people are not invertible. Odelinda is warty.", "logic": "\nMetallike(odelinda)\nMagenta(mable)\nProtruding(antonius)\nforall x (Metallike(x) -> Warty(x))\nforall x (Transeunt(x) and Metallike(x) -> Magenta(x))\nforall x (Warty(x) -> Magenta(x))\nforall x (Warty(x) and Magenta(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) -> not Metallike(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Invertible(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) and Warty(x) -> not Invertible(x))\n\nWarty(odelinda)\n\nMetallike(odelinda) and forall x (Metallike(x) -> Warty(x)) -> therefore Warty(odelinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Aveline is mesenteric. Daniela is junoesque. Jessy is euphonic. Green people are cuneiform. If someone is unhumorous and mesenteric then they are junoesque. If someone is cuneiform then they are junoesque. Cold, junoesque people are unhumorous. All regimented people are unhumorous. All regimented people are not mesenteric. All regimented people are dehiscent. Smart, cuneiform people are not dehiscent. Aveline is not cuneiform.", "logic": "\nMesenteric(aveline)\nJunoesque(daniela)\nEuphonic(jessy)\nforall x (Mesenteric(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) and Mesenteric(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Junoesque(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> not Mesenteric(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Dehiscent(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) and Cuneiform(x) -> not Dehiscent(x))\n\nnot Cuneiform(aveline)\n\nMesenteric(aveline) and forall x (Mesenteric(x) -> Cuneiform(x)) -> therefore Cuneiform(aveline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Fan is subsidiary. Tabina is bionomical. Florina is unsown. Green people are unexampled. If someone is suicidal and subsidiary then they are bionomical. If someone is unexampled then they are bionomical. Cold, bionomical people are suicidal. All sleepy people are suicidal. All sleepy people are not subsidiary. All sleepy people are suboceanic. Smart, unexampled people are not suboceanic. Fan is bionomical.", "logic": "\nSubsidiary(fan)\nBionomical(tabina)\nUnsown(florina)\nforall x (Subsidiary(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) and Subsidiary(x) -> Bionomical(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Bionomical(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and Bionomical(x) -> Suicidal(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) -> Suicidal(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) -> not Subsidiary(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) -> Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Unexampled(x) -> not Suboceanic(x))\n\nBionomical(fan)\n\nSubsidiary(fan) and forall x (Subsidiary(x) -> Unexampled(x)) -> therefore Unexampled(fan) Unexampled(fan) and forall x (Unexampled(x) -> Bionomical(x)) -> therefore Bionomical(fan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Tabbatha is vestigial. Muhammad is integral. Liuka is tractable. Green people are greater. If someone is consenting and vestigial then they are integral. If someone is greater then they are integral. Cold, integral people are consenting. All snarled people are consenting. All snarled people are not vestigial. All snarled people are raring. Smart, greater people are not raring. Tabbatha is not integral.", "logic": "\nVestigial(tabbatha)\nIntegral(muhammad)\nTractable(liuka)\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> Greater(x))\nforall x (Consenting(x) and Vestigial(x) -> Integral(x))\nforall x (Greater(x) -> Integral(x))\nforall x (Greater(x) and Integral(x) -> Consenting(x))\nforall x (Snarled(x) -> Consenting(x))\nforall x (Snarled(x) -> not Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Snarled(x) -> Raring(x))\nforall x (Snarled(x) and Greater(x) -> not Raring(x))\n\nnot Integral(tabbatha)\n\nVestigial(tabbatha) and forall x (Vestigial(x) -> Greater(x)) -> therefore Greater(tabbatha) Greater(tabbatha) and forall x (Greater(x) -> Integral(x)) -> therefore Integral(tabbatha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Cherlyn is riblike. Milzie is unvarying. Michelle is incumbent. Green people are capitalist. If someone is monitory and riblike then they are unvarying. If someone is capitalist then they are unvarying. Cold, unvarying people are monitory. All polygamous people are monitory. All polygamous people are not riblike. All polygamous people are sublimate. Smart, capitalist people are not sublimate. Cherlyn is monitory.", "logic": "\nRiblike(cherlyn)\nUnvarying(milzie)\nIncumbent(michelle)\nforall x (Riblike(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Monitory(x) and Riblike(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) and Unvarying(x) -> Monitory(x))\nforall x (Polygamous(x) -> Monitory(x))\nforall x (Polygamous(x) -> not Riblike(x))\nforall x (Polygamous(x) -> Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Polygamous(x) and Capitalist(x) -> not Sublimate(x))\n\nMonitory(cherlyn)\n\nRiblike(cherlyn) and forall x (Riblike(x) -> Capitalist(x)) -> therefore Capitalist(cherlyn) Riblike(cherlyn) and forall x (Riblike(x) -> Capitalist(x)) -> therefore Capitalist(cherlyn) Capitalist(cherlyn) and forall x (Capitalist(x) -> Unvarying(x)) -> therefore Unvarying(cherlyn) Capitalist(cherlyn) and Unvarying(cherlyn) and forall x (Capitalist(x) and Unvarying(x) -> Monitory(x)) -> therefore Monitory(cherlyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Christos is saurian. Terrance is pasteurian. Jordon is ascribable. Green people are tanzanian. If someone is northwest and saurian then they are pasteurian. If someone is tanzanian then they are pasteurian. Cold, pasteurian people are northwest. All unmedical people are northwest. All unmedical people are not saurian. All unmedical people are unstressed. Smart, tanzanian people are not unstressed. Christos is not northwest.", "logic": "\nSaurian(christos)\nPasteurian(terrance)\nAscribable(jordon)\nforall x (Saurian(x) -> Tanzanian(x))\nforall x (Northwest(x) and Saurian(x) -> Pasteurian(x))\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) -> Pasteurian(x))\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) and Pasteurian(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) -> not Saurian(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) -> Unstressed(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) and Tanzanian(x) -> not Unstressed(x))\n\nnot Northwest(christos)\n\nSaurian(christos) and forall x (Saurian(x) -> Tanzanian(x)) -> therefore Tanzanian(christos) Saurian(christos) and forall x (Saurian(x) -> Tanzanian(x)) -> therefore Tanzanian(christos) Tanzanian(christos) and forall x (Tanzanian(x) -> Pasteurian(x)) -> therefore Pasteurian(christos) Tanzanian(christos) and Pasteurian(christos) and forall x (Tanzanian(x) and Pasteurian(x) -> Northwest(x)) -> therefore Northwest(christos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Keil is futile. Lishe is unvigilant. Cathie is katabatic. Green people are largish. If someone is wintery and futile then they are unvigilant. If someone is largish then they are unvigilant. Cold, unvigilant people are wintery. All opencast people are wintery. All opencast people are not futile. All opencast people are offside. Smart, largish people are not offside. Lishe is not offside.", "logic": "\nFutile(keil)\nUnvigilant(lishe)\nKatabatic(cathie)\nforall x (Futile(x) -> Largish(x))\nforall x (Wintery(x) and Futile(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\nforall x (Largish(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\nforall x (Largish(x) and Unvigilant(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Opencast(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Opencast(x) -> not Futile(x))\nforall x (Opencast(x) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Opencast(x) and Largish(x) -> not Offside(x))\n\nnot Offside(lishe)\n\nforall x (Opencast(x) -> Offside(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Joellen is aweigh. Alexi is braised. Samuella is farfetched. Green people are subtle. If someone is montane and aweigh then they are braised. If someone is subtle then they are braised. Cold, braised people are montane. All huxleian people are montane. All huxleian people are not aweigh. All huxleian people are reticulate. Smart, subtle people are not reticulate. Alexi is montane.", "logic": "\nAweigh(joellen)\nBraised(alexi)\nFarfetched(samuella)\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Subtle(x))\nforall x (Montane(x) and Aweigh(x) -> Braised(x))\nforall x (Subtle(x) -> Braised(x))\nforall x (Subtle(x) and Braised(x) -> Montane(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Montane(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> not Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Reticulate(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) and Subtle(x) -> not Reticulate(x))\n\nMontane(alexi)\n\nforall x (Subtle(x) and Braised(x) -> Montane(x)) <- forall x (Aweigh(x) -> Subtle(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Shandy is zeroth. Leah is groovy. Hallam is lunatic. Green people are omniscient. If someone is gauzy and zeroth then they are groovy. If someone is omniscient then they are groovy. Cold, groovy people are gauzy. All luteal people are gauzy. All luteal people are not zeroth. All luteal people are emulous. Smart, omniscient people are not emulous. Hallam is not omniscient.", "logic": "\nZeroth(shandy)\nGroovy(leah)\nLunatic(hallam)\nforall x (Zeroth(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) and Zeroth(x) -> Groovy(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) -> Groovy(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) and Groovy(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Luteal(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Luteal(x) -> not Zeroth(x))\nforall x (Luteal(x) -> Emulous(x))\nforall x (Luteal(x) and Omniscient(x) -> not Emulous(x))\n\nnot Omniscient(hallam)\n\nforall x (Zeroth(x) -> Omniscient(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Sharla is upcountry. Caitlin is dickensian. Indira is unmerciful. Green people are tigerish. If someone is autoerotic and upcountry then they are dickensian. If someone is tigerish then they are dickensian. Cold, dickensian people are autoerotic. All cranial people are autoerotic. All cranial people are not upcountry. All cranial people are consequent. Smart, tigerish people are not consequent. Caitlin is tigerish.", "logic": "\nUpcountry(sharla)\nDickensian(caitlin)\nUnmerciful(indira)\nforall x (Upcountry(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) and Upcountry(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) and Dickensian(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Cranial(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Cranial(x) -> not Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Cranial(x) -> Consequent(x))\nforall x (Cranial(x) and Tigerish(x) -> not Consequent(x))\n\nTigerish(caitlin)\n\nforall x (Upcountry(x) -> Tigerish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Niles is hypodermic. Gert is lxviii. Albrecht is cataphatic. Green people are chequered. If someone is earthy and hypodermic then they are lxviii. If someone is chequered then they are lxviii. Cold, lxviii people are earthy. All nefarious people are earthy. All nefarious people are not hypodermic. All nefarious people are jainist. Smart, chequered people are not jainist. Gert is not nefarious.", "logic": "\nHypodermic(niles)\nLxviii(gert)\nCataphatic(albrecht)\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) -> Chequered(x))\nforall x (Earthy(x) and Hypodermic(x) -> Lxviii(x))\nforall x (Chequered(x) -> Lxviii(x))\nforall x (Chequered(x) and Lxviii(x) -> Earthy(x))\nforall x (Nefarious(x) -> Earthy(x))\nforall x (Nefarious(x) -> not Hypodermic(x))\nforall x (Nefarious(x) -> Jainist(x))\nforall x (Nefarious(x) and Chequered(x) -> not Jainist(x))\n\nnot Nefarious(gert)\n\nnot Nefarious(gert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Maxim is nine. Beulah is empyreal. Bethina is adorable. Green people are exculpated. If someone is outgoing and nine then they are empyreal. If someone is exculpated then they are empyreal. Cold, empyreal people are outgoing. All ratlike people are outgoing. All ratlike people are not nine. All ratlike people are lxvi. Smart, exculpated people are not lxvi. Beulah is nine.", "logic": "\nNine(maxim)\nEmpyreal(beulah)\nAdorable(bethina)\nforall x (Nine(x) -> Exculpated(x))\nforall x (Outgoing(x) and Nine(x) -> Empyreal(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) -> Empyreal(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) and Empyreal(x) -> Outgoing(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) -> Outgoing(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) -> not Nine(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) and Exculpated(x) -> not Lxvi(x))\n\nNine(beulah)\n\nNine(beulah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Gian is heated. Nessi is mucose. Cassandra is sustained. Green people are equitable. If someone is rhenish and heated then they are mucose. If someone is equitable then they are mucose. Cold, mucose people are rhenish. All lobed people are rhenish. All lobed people are not heated. All lobed people are deluxe. Smart, equitable people are not deluxe. Gian is not sustained.", "logic": "\nHeated(gian)\nMucose(nessi)\nSustained(cassandra)\nforall x (Heated(x) -> Equitable(x))\nforall x (Rhenish(x) and Heated(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Equitable(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Equitable(x) and Mucose(x) -> Rhenish(x))\nforall x (Lobed(x) -> Rhenish(x))\nforall x (Lobed(x) -> not Heated(x))\nforall x (Lobed(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nforall x (Lobed(x) and Equitable(x) -> not Deluxe(x))\n\nnot Sustained(gian)\n\nnot Sustained(gian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Linoel is viable. Marsiella is spoken. Pauly is homegrown. Green people are legitimate. If someone is helpless and viable then they are spoken. If someone is legitimate then they are spoken. Cold, spoken people are helpless. All callow people are helpless. All callow people are not viable. All callow people are alated. Smart, legitimate people are not alated. Pauly is viable.", "logic": "\nViable(linoel)\nSpoken(marsiella)\nHomegrown(pauly)\nforall x (Viable(x) -> Legitimate(x))\nforall x (Helpless(x) and Viable(x) -> Spoken(x))\nforall x (Legitimate(x) -> Spoken(x))\nforall x (Legitimate(x) and Spoken(x) -> Helpless(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) -> Helpless(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) -> not Viable(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) and Legitimate(x) -> not Alated(x))\n\nViable(pauly)\n\nViable(pauly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "The belinda escalate the ray. The belinda escalate the schroeder. The belinda is not pinnate. The belinda beetle the schroeder. The ray escalate the belinda. The ray escalate the schroeder. The ray is tetchy. The ray is prosthetic. The ray solemnise the belinda. The ray solemnise the schroeder. The schroeder escalate the ray. The schroeder is not pinnate. The schroeder is tetchy. The schroeder beetle the belinda. The schroeder solemnise the belinda. If someone is tetchy then they need the schroeder. If someone solemnise the belinda and the belinda solemnise the schroeder then the schroeder beetle the ray. If someone escalate the belinda then they like the ray. If someone solemnise the belinda then they are tetchy. If someone escalate the ray and the ray escalate the belinda then the belinda is tetchy. If someone is tetchy and they do not eat the ray then they like the schroeder. If someone is pinnate and they eat the belinda then they are booted. If the schroeder escalate the belinda then the belinda does not like the schroeder. The belinda is not pinnate.", "logic": "\nEscalate(belinda, ray)\nEscalate(belinda, schroeder)\nnot Pinnate(belinda)\nBeetle(belinda, schroeder)\nEscalate(ray, belinda)\nEscalate(ray, schroeder)\nTetchy(ray)\nProsthetic(ray)\nSolemnise(ray, belinda)\nSolemnise(ray, schroeder)\nEscalate(schroeder, ray)\nnot Pinnate(schroeder)\nTetchy(schroeder)\nBeetle(schroeder, belinda)\nSolemnise(schroeder, belinda)\nforall x (Tetchy(x) -> Solemnise(x, schroeder))\nforall x (Solemnise(x, belinda) and Solemnise(belinda, schroeder) -> Beetle(schroeder, ray))\nforall x (Escalate(x, belinda) -> Beetle(x, ray))\nforall x (Solemnise(x, belinda) -> Tetchy(x))\nforall x (Escalate(x, ray) and Escalate(ray, belinda) -> Tetchy(belinda))\nforall x (Tetchy(x) and not Escalate(x, ray) -> Beetle(x, schroeder))\nforall x (Pinnate(x) and Escalate(x, belinda) -> Booted(x))\nEscalate(schroeder, belinda) -> not Beetle(belinda, schroeder)\n\nnot Pinnate(belinda)\n\ntherefore not Pinnate(belinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The gustave protract the benjie. The gustave protract the whittaker. The gustave is not cumulous. The gustave load the whittaker. The benjie protract the gustave. The benjie protract the whittaker. The benjie is adulterant. The benjie is redundant. The benjie talk the gustave. The benjie talk the whittaker. The whittaker protract the benjie. The whittaker is not cumulous. The whittaker is adulterant. The whittaker load the gustave. The whittaker talk the gustave. If someone is adulterant then they need the whittaker. If someone talk the gustave and the gustave talk the whittaker then the whittaker load the benjie. If someone protract the gustave then they like the benjie. If someone talk the gustave then they are adulterant. If someone protract the benjie and the benjie protract the gustave then the gustave is adulterant. If someone is adulterant and they do not eat the benjie then they like the whittaker. If someone is cumulous and they eat the gustave then they are unexploded. If the whittaker protract the gustave then the gustave does not like the whittaker. The benjie is not adulterant.", "logic": "\nProtract(gustave, benjie)\nProtract(gustave, whittaker)\nnot Cumulous(gustave)\nLoad(gustave, whittaker)\nProtract(benjie, gustave)\nProtract(benjie, whittaker)\nAdulterant(benjie)\nRedundant(benjie)\nTalk(benjie, gustave)\nTalk(benjie, whittaker)\nProtract(whittaker, benjie)\nnot Cumulous(whittaker)\nAdulterant(whittaker)\nLoad(whittaker, gustave)\nTalk(whittaker, gustave)\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> Talk(x, whittaker))\nforall x (Talk(x, gustave) and Talk(gustave, whittaker) -> Load(whittaker, benjie))\nforall x (Protract(x, gustave) -> Load(x, benjie))\nforall x (Talk(x, gustave) -> Adulterant(x))\nforall x (Protract(x, benjie) and Protract(benjie, gustave) -> Adulterant(gustave))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) and not Protract(x, benjie) -> Load(x, whittaker))\nforall x (Cumulous(x) and Protract(x, gustave) -> Unexploded(x))\nProtract(whittaker, gustave) -> not Load(gustave, whittaker)\n\nnot Adulterant(benjie)\n\ntherefore Adulterant(benjie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The xymenes slacken the tessa. The xymenes slacken the hashim. The xymenes is not downtown. The xymenes backbite the hashim. The tessa slacken the xymenes. The tessa slacken the hashim. The tessa is pedestrian. The tessa is impressive. The tessa motorize the xymenes. The tessa motorize the hashim. The hashim slacken the tessa. The hashim is not downtown. The hashim is pedestrian. The hashim backbite the xymenes. The hashim motorize the xymenes. If someone is pedestrian then they need the hashim. If someone motorize the xymenes and the xymenes motorize the hashim then the hashim backbite the tessa. If someone slacken the xymenes then they like the tessa. If someone motorize the xymenes then they are pedestrian. If someone slacken the tessa and the tessa slacken the xymenes then the xymenes is pedestrian. If someone is pedestrian and they do not eat the tessa then they like the hashim. If someone is downtown and they eat the xymenes then they are bruneian. If the hashim slacken the xymenes then the xymenes does not like the hashim. The tessa backbite the tessa.", "logic": "\nSlacken(xymenes, tessa)\nSlacken(xymenes, hashim)\nnot Downtown(xymenes)\nBackbite(xymenes, hashim)\nSlacken(tessa, xymenes)\nSlacken(tessa, hashim)\nPedestrian(tessa)\nImpressive(tessa)\nMotorize(tessa, xymenes)\nMotorize(tessa, hashim)\nSlacken(hashim, tessa)\nnot Downtown(hashim)\nPedestrian(hashim)\nBackbite(hashim, xymenes)\nMotorize(hashim, xymenes)\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> Motorize(x, hashim))\nforall x (Motorize(x, xymenes) and Motorize(xymenes, hashim) -> Backbite(hashim, tessa))\nforall x (Slacken(x, xymenes) -> Backbite(x, tessa))\nforall x (Motorize(x, xymenes) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Slacken(x, tessa) and Slacken(tessa, xymenes) -> Pedestrian(xymenes))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) and not Slacken(x, tessa) -> Backbite(x, hashim))\nforall x (Downtown(x) and Slacken(x, xymenes) -> Bruneian(x))\nSlacken(hashim, xymenes) -> not Backbite(xymenes, hashim)\n\nBackbite(tessa, tessa)\n\nSlacken(tessa, xymenes) and forall x (Slacken(x, xymenes) -> Backbite(x, tessa)) -> therefore Backbite(tessa, tessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The donnajean detract the brunhilda. The donnajean detract the isis. The donnajean is not indebted. The donnajean culminate the isis. The brunhilda detract the donnajean. The brunhilda detract the isis. The brunhilda is handsome. The brunhilda is fourfold. The brunhilda construe the donnajean. The brunhilda construe the isis. The isis detract the brunhilda. The isis is not indebted. The isis is handsome. The isis culminate the donnajean. The isis construe the donnajean. If someone is handsome then they need the isis. If someone construe the donnajean and the donnajean construe the isis then the isis culminate the brunhilda. If someone detract the donnajean then they like the brunhilda. If someone construe the donnajean then they are handsome. If someone detract the brunhilda and the brunhilda detract the donnajean then the donnajean is handsome. If someone is handsome and they do not eat the brunhilda then they like the isis. If someone is indebted and they eat the donnajean then they are trochaic. If the isis detract the donnajean then the donnajean does not like the isis. The isis does not need the isis.", "logic": "\nDetract(donnajean, brunhilda)\nDetract(donnajean, isis)\nnot Indebted(donnajean)\nCulminate(donnajean, isis)\nDetract(brunhilda, donnajean)\nDetract(brunhilda, isis)\nHandsome(brunhilda)\nFourfold(brunhilda)\nConstrue(brunhilda, donnajean)\nConstrue(brunhilda, isis)\nDetract(isis, brunhilda)\nnot Indebted(isis)\nHandsome(isis)\nCulminate(isis, donnajean)\nConstrue(isis, donnajean)\nforall x (Handsome(x) -> Construe(x, isis))\nforall x (Construe(x, donnajean) and Construe(donnajean, isis) -> Culminate(isis, brunhilda))\nforall x (Detract(x, donnajean) -> Culminate(x, brunhilda))\nforall x (Construe(x, donnajean) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Detract(x, brunhilda) and Detract(brunhilda, donnajean) -> Handsome(donnajean))\nforall x (Handsome(x) and not Detract(x, brunhilda) -> Culminate(x, isis))\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Detract(x, donnajean) -> Trochaic(x))\nDetract(isis, donnajean) -> not Culminate(donnajean, isis)\n\nnot Construe(isis, isis)\n\nHandsome(isis) and forall x (Handsome(x) -> Construe(x, isis)) -> therefore Construe(isis, isis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The raymundo dragoon the grethel. The raymundo dragoon the darcey. The raymundo is not onshore. The raymundo escalade the darcey. The grethel dragoon the raymundo. The grethel dragoon the darcey. The grethel is advanced. The grethel is rending. The grethel rafter the raymundo. The grethel rafter the darcey. The darcey dragoon the grethel. The darcey is not onshore. The darcey is advanced. The darcey escalade the raymundo. The darcey rafter the raymundo. If someone is advanced then they need the darcey. If someone rafter the raymundo and the raymundo rafter the darcey then the darcey escalade the grethel. If someone dragoon the raymundo then they like the grethel. If someone rafter the raymundo then they are advanced. If someone dragoon the grethel and the grethel dragoon the raymundo then the raymundo is advanced. If someone is advanced and they do not eat the grethel then they like the darcey. If someone is onshore and they eat the raymundo then they are unbaffled. If the darcey dragoon the raymundo then the raymundo does not like the darcey. The raymundo rafter the darcey.", "logic": "\nDragoon(raymundo, grethel)\nDragoon(raymundo, darcey)\nnot Onshore(raymundo)\nEscalade(raymundo, darcey)\nDragoon(grethel, raymundo)\nDragoon(grethel, darcey)\nAdvanced(grethel)\nRending(grethel)\nRafter(grethel, raymundo)\nRafter(grethel, darcey)\nDragoon(darcey, grethel)\nnot Onshore(darcey)\nAdvanced(darcey)\nEscalade(darcey, raymundo)\nRafter(darcey, raymundo)\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Rafter(x, darcey))\nforall x (Rafter(x, raymundo) and Rafter(raymundo, darcey) -> Escalade(darcey, grethel))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, raymundo) -> Escalade(x, grethel))\nforall x (Rafter(x, raymundo) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, grethel) and Dragoon(grethel, raymundo) -> Advanced(raymundo))\nforall x (Advanced(x) and not Dragoon(x, grethel) -> Escalade(x, darcey))\nforall x (Onshore(x) and Dragoon(x, raymundo) -> Unbaffled(x))\nDragoon(darcey, raymundo) -> not Escalade(raymundo, darcey)\n\nRafter(raymundo, darcey)\n\nDragoon(raymundo, grethel) and Dragoon(grethel, raymundo) and forall x (Dragoon(x, grethel) and Dragoon(grethel, raymundo) -> Advanced(raymundo)) -> therefore Advanced(raymundo) Advanced(raymundo) and forall x (Advanced(x) -> Rafter(x, darcey)) -> therefore Rafter(raymundo, darcey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The jehu sediment the ameline. The jehu sediment the maressa. The jehu is not nigerien. The jehu tenant the maressa. The ameline sediment the jehu. The ameline sediment the maressa. The ameline is agelong. The ameline is queenly. The ameline suppress the jehu. The ameline suppress the maressa. The maressa sediment the ameline. The maressa is not nigerien. The maressa is agelong. The maressa tenant the jehu. The maressa suppress the jehu. If someone is agelong then they need the maressa. If someone suppress the jehu and the jehu suppress the maressa then the maressa tenant the ameline. If someone sediment the jehu then they like the ameline. If someone suppress the jehu then they are agelong. If someone sediment the ameline and the ameline sediment the jehu then the jehu is agelong. If someone is agelong and they do not eat the ameline then they like the maressa. If someone is nigerien and they eat the jehu then they are unsolvable. If the maressa sediment the jehu then the jehu does not like the maressa. The jehu does not need the maressa.", "logic": "\nSediment(jehu, ameline)\nSediment(jehu, maressa)\nnot Nigerien(jehu)\nTenant(jehu, maressa)\nSediment(ameline, jehu)\nSediment(ameline, maressa)\nAgelong(ameline)\nQueenly(ameline)\nSuppress(ameline, jehu)\nSuppress(ameline, maressa)\nSediment(maressa, ameline)\nnot Nigerien(maressa)\nAgelong(maressa)\nTenant(maressa, jehu)\nSuppress(maressa, jehu)\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Suppress(x, maressa))\nforall x (Suppress(x, jehu) and Suppress(jehu, maressa) -> Tenant(maressa, ameline))\nforall x (Sediment(x, jehu) -> Tenant(x, ameline))\nforall x (Suppress(x, jehu) -> Agelong(x))\nforall x (Sediment(x, ameline) and Sediment(ameline, jehu) -> Agelong(jehu))\nforall x (Agelong(x) and not Sediment(x, ameline) -> Tenant(x, maressa))\nforall x (Nigerien(x) and Sediment(x, jehu) -> Unsolvable(x))\nSediment(maressa, jehu) -> not Tenant(jehu, maressa)\n\nnot Suppress(jehu, maressa)\n\nSediment(jehu, ameline) and Sediment(ameline, jehu) and forall x (Sediment(x, ameline) and Sediment(ameline, jehu) -> Agelong(jehu)) -> therefore Agelong(jehu) Agelong(jehu) and forall x (Agelong(x) -> Suppress(x, maressa)) -> therefore Suppress(jehu, maressa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The jon agonise the atlanta. The jon agonise the walt. The jon is not trilingual. The jon cackel the walt. The atlanta agonise the jon. The atlanta agonise the walt. The atlanta is largo. The atlanta is faraway. The atlanta linger the jon. The atlanta linger the walt. The walt agonise the atlanta. The walt is not trilingual. The walt is largo. The walt cackel the jon. The walt linger the jon. If someone is largo then they need the walt. If someone linger the jon and the jon linger the walt then the walt cackel the atlanta. If someone agonise the jon then they like the atlanta. If someone linger the jon then they are largo. If someone agonise the atlanta and the atlanta agonise the jon then the jon is largo. If someone is largo and they do not eat the atlanta then they like the walt. If someone is trilingual and they eat the jon then they are ductile. If the walt agonise the jon then the jon does not like the walt. The walt cackel the atlanta.", "logic": "\nAgonise(jon, atlanta)\nAgonise(jon, walt)\nnot Trilingual(jon)\nCackel(jon, walt)\nAgonise(atlanta, jon)\nAgonise(atlanta, walt)\nLargo(atlanta)\nFaraway(atlanta)\nLinger(atlanta, jon)\nLinger(atlanta, walt)\nAgonise(walt, atlanta)\nnot Trilingual(walt)\nLargo(walt)\nCackel(walt, jon)\nLinger(walt, jon)\nforall x (Largo(x) -> Linger(x, walt))\nforall x (Linger(x, jon) and Linger(jon, walt) -> Cackel(walt, atlanta))\nforall x (Agonise(x, jon) -> Cackel(x, atlanta))\nforall x (Linger(x, jon) -> Largo(x))\nforall x (Agonise(x, atlanta) and Agonise(atlanta, jon) -> Largo(jon))\nforall x (Largo(x) and not Agonise(x, atlanta) -> Cackel(x, walt))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) and Agonise(x, jon) -> Ductile(x))\nAgonise(walt, jon) -> not Cackel(jon, walt)\n\nCackel(walt, atlanta)\n\nAgonise(jon, atlanta) and Agonise(atlanta, jon) and forall x (Agonise(x, atlanta) and Agonise(atlanta, jon) -> Largo(jon)) -> therefore Largo(jon) Largo(jon) and forall x (Largo(x) -> Linger(x, walt)) -> therefore Linger(jon, walt) Linger(walt, jon) and Linger(jon, walt) and forall x (Linger(x, jon) and Linger(jon, walt) -> Cackel(walt, atlanta)) -> therefore Cackel(walt, atlanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The javier incur the mireille. The javier incur the gil. The javier is not scary. The javier disaffect the gil. The mireille incur the javier. The mireille incur the gil. The mireille is amoristic. The mireille is microsomal. The mireille alkalinise the javier. The mireille alkalinise the gil. The gil incur the mireille. The gil is not scary. The gil is amoristic. The gil disaffect the javier. The gil alkalinise the javier. If someone is amoristic then they need the gil. If someone alkalinise the javier and the javier alkalinise the gil then the gil disaffect the mireille. If someone incur the javier then they like the mireille. If someone alkalinise the javier then they are amoristic. If someone incur the mireille and the mireille incur the javier then the javier is amoristic. If someone is amoristic and they do not eat the mireille then they like the gil. If someone is scary and they eat the javier then they are dependent. If the gil incur the javier then the javier does not like the gil. The gil does not like the mireille.", "logic": "\nIncur(javier, mireille)\nIncur(javier, gil)\nnot Scary(javier)\nDisaffect(javier, gil)\nIncur(mireille, javier)\nIncur(mireille, gil)\nAmoristic(mireille)\nMicrosomal(mireille)\nAlkalinise(mireille, javier)\nAlkalinise(mireille, gil)\nIncur(gil, mireille)\nnot Scary(gil)\nAmoristic(gil)\nDisaffect(gil, javier)\nAlkalinise(gil, javier)\nforall x (Amoristic(x) -> Alkalinise(x, gil))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, javier) and Alkalinise(javier, gil) -> Disaffect(gil, mireille))\nforall x (Incur(x, javier) -> Disaffect(x, mireille))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, javier) -> Amoristic(x))\nforall x (Incur(x, mireille) and Incur(mireille, javier) -> Amoristic(javier))\nforall x (Amoristic(x) and not Incur(x, mireille) -> Disaffect(x, gil))\nforall x (Scary(x) and Incur(x, javier) -> Dependent(x))\nIncur(gil, javier) -> not Disaffect(javier, gil)\n\nnot Disaffect(gil, mireille)\n\nIncur(javier, mireille) and Incur(mireille, javier) and forall x (Incur(x, mireille) and Incur(mireille, javier) -> Amoristic(javier)) -> therefore Amoristic(javier) Amoristic(javier) and forall x (Amoristic(x) -> Alkalinise(x, gil)) -> therefore Alkalinise(javier, gil) Alkalinise(gil, javier) and Alkalinise(javier, gil) and forall x (Alkalinise(x, javier) and Alkalinise(javier, gil) -> Disaffect(gil, mireille)) -> therefore Disaffect(gil, mireille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The cathrine squire the marjie. The cathrine squire the auberta. The cathrine is not capsular. The cathrine induce the auberta. The marjie squire the cathrine. The marjie squire the auberta. The marjie is assumed. The marjie is apteral. The marjie pervade the cathrine. The marjie pervade the auberta. The auberta squire the marjie. The auberta is not capsular. The auberta is assumed. The auberta induce the cathrine. The auberta pervade the cathrine. If someone is assumed then they need the auberta. If someone pervade the cathrine and the cathrine pervade the auberta then the auberta induce the marjie. If someone squire the cathrine then they like the marjie. If someone pervade the cathrine then they are assumed. If someone squire the marjie and the marjie squire the cathrine then the cathrine is assumed. If someone is assumed and they do not eat the marjie then they like the auberta. If someone is capsular and they eat the cathrine then they are brimful. If the auberta squire the cathrine then the cathrine does not like the auberta. The marjie does not like the auberta.", "logic": "\nSquire(cathrine, marjie)\nSquire(cathrine, auberta)\nnot Capsular(cathrine)\nInduce(cathrine, auberta)\nSquire(marjie, cathrine)\nSquire(marjie, auberta)\nAssumed(marjie)\nApteral(marjie)\nPervade(marjie, cathrine)\nPervade(marjie, auberta)\nSquire(auberta, marjie)\nnot Capsular(auberta)\nAssumed(auberta)\nInduce(auberta, cathrine)\nPervade(auberta, cathrine)\nforall x (Assumed(x) -> Pervade(x, auberta))\nforall x (Pervade(x, cathrine) and Pervade(cathrine, auberta) -> Induce(auberta, marjie))\nforall x (Squire(x, cathrine) -> Induce(x, marjie))\nforall x (Pervade(x, cathrine) -> Assumed(x))\nforall x (Squire(x, marjie) and Squire(marjie, cathrine) -> Assumed(cathrine))\nforall x (Assumed(x) and not Squire(x, marjie) -> Induce(x, auberta))\nforall x (Capsular(x) and Squire(x, cathrine) -> Brimful(x))\nSquire(auberta, cathrine) -> not Induce(cathrine, auberta)\n\nnot Induce(marjie, auberta)\n\nforall x (Assumed(x) and not Squire(x, marjie) -> Induce(x, auberta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The keri wade the laverna. The keri wade the alyda. The keri is not northmost. The keri understock the alyda. The laverna wade the keri. The laverna wade the alyda. The laverna is liberal. The laverna is anodic. The laverna photocopy the keri. The laverna photocopy the alyda. The alyda wade the laverna. The alyda is not northmost. The alyda is liberal. The alyda understock the keri. The alyda photocopy the keri. If someone is liberal then they need the alyda. If someone photocopy the keri and the keri photocopy the alyda then the alyda understock the laverna. If someone wade the keri then they like the laverna. If someone photocopy the keri then they are liberal. If someone wade the laverna and the laverna wade the keri then the keri is liberal. If someone is liberal and they do not eat the laverna then they like the alyda. If someone is northmost and they eat the keri then they are romanian. If the alyda wade the keri then the keri does not like the alyda. The keri is romanian.", "logic": "\nWade(keri, laverna)\nWade(keri, alyda)\nnot Northmost(keri)\nUnderstock(keri, alyda)\nWade(laverna, keri)\nWade(laverna, alyda)\nLiberal(laverna)\nAnodic(laverna)\nPhotocopy(laverna, keri)\nPhotocopy(laverna, alyda)\nWade(alyda, laverna)\nnot Northmost(alyda)\nLiberal(alyda)\nUnderstock(alyda, keri)\nPhotocopy(alyda, keri)\nforall x (Liberal(x) -> Photocopy(x, alyda))\nforall x (Photocopy(x, keri) and Photocopy(keri, alyda) -> Understock(alyda, laverna))\nforall x (Wade(x, keri) -> Understock(x, laverna))\nforall x (Photocopy(x, keri) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Wade(x, laverna) and Wade(laverna, keri) -> Liberal(keri))\nforall x (Liberal(x) and not Wade(x, laverna) -> Understock(x, alyda))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and Wade(x, keri) -> Romanian(x))\nWade(alyda, keri) -> not Understock(keri, alyda)\n\nRomanian(keri)\n\nforall x (Northmost(x) and Wade(x, keri) -> Romanian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The cassandra preclude the jesse. The cassandra preclude the gilli. The cassandra is not pietistic. The cassandra cinematize the gilli. The jesse preclude the cassandra. The jesse preclude the gilli. The jesse is downwind. The jesse is littered. The jesse gong the cassandra. The jesse gong the gilli. The gilli preclude the jesse. The gilli is not pietistic. The gilli is downwind. The gilli cinematize the cassandra. The gilli gong the cassandra. If someone is downwind then they need the gilli. If someone gong the cassandra and the cassandra gong the gilli then the gilli cinematize the jesse. If someone preclude the cassandra then they like the jesse. If someone gong the cassandra then they are downwind. If someone preclude the jesse and the jesse preclude the cassandra then the cassandra is downwind. If someone is downwind and they do not eat the jesse then they like the gilli. If someone is pietistic and they eat the cassandra then they are dietetic. If the gilli preclude the cassandra then the cassandra does not like the gilli. The gilli does not like the gilli.", "logic": "\nPreclude(cassandra, jesse)\nPreclude(cassandra, gilli)\nnot Pietistic(cassandra)\nCinematize(cassandra, gilli)\nPreclude(jesse, cassandra)\nPreclude(jesse, gilli)\nDownwind(jesse)\nLittered(jesse)\nGong(jesse, cassandra)\nGong(jesse, gilli)\nPreclude(gilli, jesse)\nnot Pietistic(gilli)\nDownwind(gilli)\nCinematize(gilli, cassandra)\nGong(gilli, cassandra)\nforall x (Downwind(x) -> Gong(x, gilli))\nforall x (Gong(x, cassandra) and Gong(cassandra, gilli) -> Cinematize(gilli, jesse))\nforall x (Preclude(x, cassandra) -> Cinematize(x, jesse))\nforall x (Gong(x, cassandra) -> Downwind(x))\nforall x (Preclude(x, jesse) and Preclude(jesse, cassandra) -> Downwind(cassandra))\nforall x (Downwind(x) and not Preclude(x, jesse) -> Cinematize(x, gilli))\nforall x (Pietistic(x) and Preclude(x, cassandra) -> Dietetic(x))\nPreclude(gilli, cassandra) -> not Cinematize(cassandra, gilli)\n\nnot Cinematize(gilli, gilli)\n\nforall x (Downwind(x) and not Preclude(x, jesse) -> Cinematize(x, gilli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The marjorie bespot the orella. The marjorie bespot the antin. The marjorie is not gluttonous. The marjorie striate the antin. The orella bespot the marjorie. The orella bespot the antin. The orella is toughened. The orella is dusty. The orella ebonize the marjorie. The orella ebonize the antin. The antin bespot the orella. The antin is not gluttonous. The antin is toughened. The antin striate the marjorie. The antin ebonize the marjorie. If someone is toughened then they need the antin. If someone ebonize the marjorie and the marjorie ebonize the antin then the antin striate the orella. If someone bespot the marjorie then they like the orella. If someone ebonize the marjorie then they are toughened. If someone bespot the orella and the orella bespot the marjorie then the marjorie is toughened. If someone is toughened and they do not eat the orella then they like the antin. If someone is gluttonous and they eat the marjorie then they are parted. If the antin bespot the marjorie then the marjorie does not like the antin. The marjorie striate the orella.", "logic": "\nBespot(marjorie, orella)\nBespot(marjorie, antin)\nnot Gluttonous(marjorie)\nStriate(marjorie, antin)\nBespot(orella, marjorie)\nBespot(orella, antin)\nToughened(orella)\nDusty(orella)\nEbonize(orella, marjorie)\nEbonize(orella, antin)\nBespot(antin, orella)\nnot Gluttonous(antin)\nToughened(antin)\nStriate(antin, marjorie)\nEbonize(antin, marjorie)\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Ebonize(x, antin))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, marjorie) and Ebonize(marjorie, antin) -> Striate(antin, orella))\nforall x (Bespot(x, marjorie) -> Striate(x, orella))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, marjorie) -> Toughened(x))\nforall x (Bespot(x, orella) and Bespot(orella, marjorie) -> Toughened(marjorie))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and not Bespot(x, orella) -> Striate(x, antin))\nforall x (Gluttonous(x) and Bespot(x, marjorie) -> Parted(x))\nBespot(antin, marjorie) -> not Striate(marjorie, antin)\n\nStriate(marjorie, orella)\n\nforall x (Bespot(x, marjorie) -> Striate(x, orella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The stephine subtilize the fredi. The stephine subtilize the shanna. The stephine is not undefeated. The stephine frustrate the shanna. The fredi subtilize the stephine. The fredi subtilize the shanna. The fredi is bumpkinly. The fredi is vagal. The fredi require the stephine. The fredi require the shanna. The shanna subtilize the fredi. The shanna is not undefeated. The shanna is bumpkinly. The shanna frustrate the stephine. The shanna require the stephine. If someone is bumpkinly then they need the shanna. If someone require the stephine and the stephine require the shanna then the shanna frustrate the fredi. If someone subtilize the stephine then they like the fredi. If someone require the stephine then they are bumpkinly. If someone subtilize the fredi and the fredi subtilize the stephine then the stephine is bumpkinly. If someone is bumpkinly and they do not eat the fredi then they like the shanna. If someone is undefeated and they eat the stephine then they are sobering. If the shanna subtilize the stephine then the stephine does not like the shanna. The fredi is not rough.", "logic": "\nSubtilize(stephine, fredi)\nSubtilize(stephine, shanna)\nnot Undefeated(stephine)\nFrustrate(stephine, shanna)\nSubtilize(fredi, stephine)\nSubtilize(fredi, shanna)\nBumpkinly(fredi)\nVagal(fredi)\nRequire(fredi, stephine)\nRequire(fredi, shanna)\nSubtilize(shanna, fredi)\nnot Undefeated(shanna)\nBumpkinly(shanna)\nFrustrate(shanna, stephine)\nRequire(shanna, stephine)\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) -> Require(x, shanna))\nforall x (Require(x, stephine) and Require(stephine, shanna) -> Frustrate(shanna, fredi))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, stephine) -> Frustrate(x, fredi))\nforall x (Require(x, stephine) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, fredi) and Subtilize(fredi, stephine) -> Bumpkinly(stephine))\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) and not Subtilize(x, fredi) -> Frustrate(x, shanna))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and Subtilize(x, stephine) -> Sobering(x))\nSubtilize(shanna, stephine) -> not Frustrate(stephine, shanna)\n\nnot Rough(fredi)\n\nnot Rough(fredi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The taber loaf the petunia. The taber loaf the adriane. The taber is not exalted. The taber hound the adriane. The petunia loaf the taber. The petunia loaf the adriane. The petunia is dinky. The petunia is discursive. The petunia anathemise the taber. The petunia anathemise the adriane. The adriane loaf the petunia. The adriane is not exalted. The adriane is dinky. The adriane hound the taber. The adriane anathemise the taber. If someone is dinky then they need the adriane. If someone anathemise the taber and the taber anathemise the adriane then the adriane hound the petunia. If someone loaf the taber then they like the petunia. If someone anathemise the taber then they are dinky. If someone loaf the petunia and the petunia loaf the taber then the taber is dinky. If someone is dinky and they do not eat the petunia then they like the adriane. If someone is exalted and they eat the taber then they are rounded. If the adriane loaf the taber then the taber does not like the adriane. The adriane anathemise the petunia.", "logic": "\nLoaf(taber, petunia)\nLoaf(taber, adriane)\nnot Exalted(taber)\nHound(taber, adriane)\nLoaf(petunia, taber)\nLoaf(petunia, adriane)\nDinky(petunia)\nDiscursive(petunia)\nAnathemise(petunia, taber)\nAnathemise(petunia, adriane)\nLoaf(adriane, petunia)\nnot Exalted(adriane)\nDinky(adriane)\nHound(adriane, taber)\nAnathemise(adriane, taber)\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Anathemise(x, adriane))\nforall x (Anathemise(x, taber) and Anathemise(taber, adriane) -> Hound(adriane, petunia))\nforall x (Loaf(x, taber) -> Hound(x, petunia))\nforall x (Anathemise(x, taber) -> Dinky(x))\nforall x (Loaf(x, petunia) and Loaf(petunia, taber) -> Dinky(taber))\nforall x (Dinky(x) and not Loaf(x, petunia) -> Hound(x, adriane))\nforall x (Exalted(x) and Loaf(x, taber) -> Rounded(x))\nLoaf(adriane, taber) -> not Hound(taber, adriane)\n\nAnathemise(adriane, petunia)\n\nAnathemise(adriane, petunia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The bell cooperate the ramonda. The bell cooperate the renee. The bell is not intense. The bell mine the renee. The ramonda cooperate the bell. The ramonda cooperate the renee. The ramonda is unsated. The ramonda is facile. The ramonda exceed the bell. The ramonda exceed the renee. The renee cooperate the ramonda. The renee is not intense. The renee is unsated. The renee mine the bell. The renee exceed the bell. If someone is unsated then they need the renee. If someone exceed the bell and the bell exceed the renee then the renee mine the ramonda. If someone cooperate the bell then they like the ramonda. If someone exceed the bell then they are unsated. If someone cooperate the ramonda and the ramonda cooperate the bell then the bell is unsated. If someone is unsated and they do not eat the ramonda then they like the renee. If someone is intense and they eat the bell then they are pronged. If the renee cooperate the bell then the bell does not like the renee. The bell does not need the ramonda.", "logic": "\nCooperate(bell, ramonda)\nCooperate(bell, renee)\nnot Intense(bell)\nMine(bell, renee)\nCooperate(ramonda, bell)\nCooperate(ramonda, renee)\nUnsated(ramonda)\nFacile(ramonda)\nExceed(ramonda, bell)\nExceed(ramonda, renee)\nCooperate(renee, ramonda)\nnot Intense(renee)\nUnsated(renee)\nMine(renee, bell)\nExceed(renee, bell)\nforall x (Unsated(x) -> Exceed(x, renee))\nforall x (Exceed(x, bell) and Exceed(bell, renee) -> Mine(renee, ramonda))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, bell) -> Mine(x, ramonda))\nforall x (Exceed(x, bell) -> Unsated(x))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, ramonda) and Cooperate(ramonda, bell) -> Unsated(bell))\nforall x (Unsated(x) and not Cooperate(x, ramonda) -> Mine(x, renee))\nforall x (Intense(x) and Cooperate(x, bell) -> Pronged(x))\nCooperate(renee, bell) -> not Mine(bell, renee)\n\nnot Exceed(bell, ramonda)\n\nnot Exceed(bell, ramonda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The cassandra procreate the eba. The cassandra procreate the kimmie. The cassandra is not eased. The cassandra ditch the kimmie. The eba procreate the cassandra. The eba procreate the kimmie. The eba is birken. The eba is equivocal. The eba felt the cassandra. The eba felt the kimmie. The kimmie procreate the eba. The kimmie is not eased. The kimmie is birken. The kimmie ditch the cassandra. The kimmie felt the cassandra. If someone is birken then they need the kimmie. If someone felt the cassandra and the cassandra felt the kimmie then the kimmie ditch the eba. If someone procreate the cassandra then they like the eba. If someone felt the cassandra then they are birken. If someone procreate the eba and the eba procreate the cassandra then the cassandra is birken. If someone is birken and they do not eat the eba then they like the kimmie. If someone is eased and they eat the cassandra then they are wavelike. If the kimmie procreate the cassandra then the cassandra does not like the kimmie. The cassandra is rough.", "logic": "\nProcreate(cassandra, eba)\nProcreate(cassandra, kimmie)\nnot Eased(cassandra)\nDitch(cassandra, kimmie)\nProcreate(eba, cassandra)\nProcreate(eba, kimmie)\nBirken(eba)\nEquivocal(eba)\nFelt(eba, cassandra)\nFelt(eba, kimmie)\nProcreate(kimmie, eba)\nnot Eased(kimmie)\nBirken(kimmie)\nDitch(kimmie, cassandra)\nFelt(kimmie, cassandra)\nforall x (Birken(x) -> Felt(x, kimmie))\nforall x (Felt(x, cassandra) and Felt(cassandra, kimmie) -> Ditch(kimmie, eba))\nforall x (Procreate(x, cassandra) -> Ditch(x, eba))\nforall x (Felt(x, cassandra) -> Birken(x))\nforall x (Procreate(x, eba) and Procreate(eba, cassandra) -> Birken(cassandra))\nforall x (Birken(x) and not Procreate(x, eba) -> Ditch(x, kimmie))\nforall x (Eased(x) and Procreate(x, cassandra) -> Wavelike(x))\nProcreate(kimmie, cassandra) -> not Ditch(cassandra, kimmie)\n\nRough(cassandra)\n\nRough(cassandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The babara summarize the yuri. The yuri is outboard. If something summarize the yuri then the yuri waterproof the babara. If something waterproof the yuri then the yuri does not like the babara. If the yuri is gushing then the yuri is awny. If the yuri admit the babara then the babara is not welcoming. If the yuri waterproof the babara then the yuri summarize the babara. If something waterproof the babara and it summarize the babara then the babara is not albinal. If the yuri summarize the babara and the babara does not need the yuri then the babara does not like the yuri. If something waterproof the babara then it is albinal. The yuri is outboard.", "logic": "\nSummarize(babara, yuri)\nOutboard(yuri)\nforall x (Summarize(x, yuri) -> Waterproof(yuri, babara))\nforall x (Waterproof(x, yuri) -> not Waterproof(yuri, babara))\nGushing(yuri) -> Awny(yuri)\nAdmit(yuri, babara) -> not Welcoming(babara)\nWaterproof(yuri, babara) -> Summarize(yuri, babara)\nforall x (Waterproof(x, babara) and Summarize(x, babara) -> not Albinal(babara))\nSummarize(yuri, babara) and not Summarize(babara, yuri) -> not Waterproof(babara, yuri)\nforall x (Waterproof(x, babara) -> Albinal(x))\n\nOutboard(yuri)\n\ntherefore Outboard(yuri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The dwane sleepwalk the elias. The elias is buffoonish. If something sleepwalk the elias then the elias concede the dwane. If something concede the elias then the elias does not like the dwane. If the elias is wavy then the elias is qualified. If the elias leverage the dwane then the dwane is not schmalzy. If the elias concede the dwane then the elias sleepwalk the dwane. If something concede the dwane and it sleepwalk the dwane then the dwane is not centennial. If the elias sleepwalk the dwane and the dwane does not need the elias then the dwane does not like the elias. If something concede the dwane then it is centennial. The elias is not buffoonish.", "logic": "\nSleepwalk(dwane, elias)\nBuffoonish(elias)\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, elias) -> Concede(elias, dwane))\nforall x (Concede(x, elias) -> not Concede(elias, dwane))\nWavy(elias) -> Qualified(elias)\nLeverage(elias, dwane) -> not Schmalzy(dwane)\nConcede(elias, dwane) -> Sleepwalk(elias, dwane)\nforall x (Concede(x, dwane) and Sleepwalk(x, dwane) -> not Centennial(dwane))\nSleepwalk(elias, dwane) and not Sleepwalk(dwane, elias) -> not Concede(dwane, elias)\nforall x (Concede(x, dwane) -> Centennial(x))\n\nnot Buffoonish(elias)\n\ntherefore Buffoonish(elias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The robinet revamp the avraham. The avraham is mixable. If something revamp the avraham then the avraham titter the robinet. If something titter the avraham then the avraham does not like the robinet. If the avraham is patristic then the avraham is gregarious. If the avraham dehumanise the robinet then the robinet is not halcyon. If the avraham titter the robinet then the avraham revamp the robinet. If something titter the robinet and it revamp the robinet then the robinet is not kechuan. If the avraham revamp the robinet and the robinet does not need the avraham then the robinet does not like the avraham. If something titter the robinet then it is kechuan. The avraham titter the robinet.", "logic": "\nRevamp(robinet, avraham)\nMixable(avraham)\nforall x (Revamp(x, avraham) -> Titter(avraham, robinet))\nforall x (Titter(x, avraham) -> not Titter(avraham, robinet))\nPatristic(avraham) -> Gregarious(avraham)\nDehumanise(avraham, robinet) -> not Halcyon(robinet)\nTitter(avraham, robinet) -> Revamp(avraham, robinet)\nforall x (Titter(x, robinet) and Revamp(x, robinet) -> not Kechuan(robinet))\nRevamp(avraham, robinet) and not Revamp(robinet, avraham) -> not Titter(robinet, avraham)\nforall x (Titter(x, robinet) -> Kechuan(x))\n\nTitter(avraham, robinet)\n\nRevamp(robinet, avraham) and forall x (Revamp(x, avraham) -> Titter(avraham, robinet)) -> therefore Titter(avraham, robinet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The zenia pussyfoot the lance. The lance is wavy. If something pussyfoot the lance then the lance think the zenia. If something think the lance then the lance does not like the zenia. If the lance is lighted then the lance is damn. If the lance palter the zenia then the zenia is not embroiled. If the lance think the zenia then the lance pussyfoot the zenia. If something think the zenia and it pussyfoot the zenia then the zenia is not spumy. If the lance pussyfoot the zenia and the zenia does not need the lance then the zenia does not like the lance. If something think the zenia then it is spumy. The lance does not like the zenia.", "logic": "\nPussyfoot(zenia, lance)\nWavy(lance)\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, lance) -> Think(lance, zenia))\nforall x (Think(x, lance) -> not Think(lance, zenia))\nLighted(lance) -> Damn(lance)\nPalter(lance, zenia) -> not Embroiled(zenia)\nThink(lance, zenia) -> Pussyfoot(lance, zenia)\nforall x (Think(x, zenia) and Pussyfoot(x, zenia) -> not Spumy(zenia))\nPussyfoot(lance, zenia) and not Pussyfoot(zenia, lance) -> not Think(zenia, lance)\nforall x (Think(x, zenia) -> Spumy(x))\n\nnot Think(lance, zenia)\n\nPussyfoot(zenia, lance) and forall x (Pussyfoot(x, lance) -> Think(lance, zenia)) -> therefore Think(lance, zenia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The antony research the alastair. The alastair is nonlegal. If something research the alastair then the alastair unhook the antony. If something unhook the alastair then the alastair does not like the antony. If the alastair is phonologic then the alastair is tiptop. If the alastair retread the antony then the antony is not impuissant. If the alastair unhook the antony then the alastair research the antony. If something unhook the antony and it research the antony then the antony is not asphaltic. If the alastair research the antony and the antony does not need the alastair then the antony does not like the alastair. If something unhook the antony then it is asphaltic. The alastair is asphaltic.", "logic": "\nResearch(antony, alastair)\nNonlegal(alastair)\nforall x (Research(x, alastair) -> Unhook(alastair, antony))\nforall x (Unhook(x, alastair) -> not Unhook(alastair, antony))\nPhonologic(alastair) -> Tiptop(alastair)\nRetread(alastair, antony) -> not Impuissant(antony)\nUnhook(alastair, antony) -> Research(alastair, antony)\nforall x (Unhook(x, antony) and Research(x, antony) -> not Asphaltic(antony))\nResearch(alastair, antony) and not Research(antony, alastair) -> not Unhook(antony, alastair)\nforall x (Unhook(x, antony) -> Asphaltic(x))\n\nAsphaltic(alastair)\n\nResearch(antony, alastair) and forall x (Research(x, alastair) -> Unhook(alastair, antony)) -> therefore Unhook(alastair, antony) Unhook(alastair, antony) and forall x (Unhook(x, antony) -> Asphaltic(x)) -> therefore Asphaltic(alastair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The francisco palsy the remus. The remus is saxicoline. If something palsy the remus then the remus vegetate the francisco. If something vegetate the remus then the remus does not like the francisco. If the remus is weensy then the remus is mucinoid. If the remus shadowbox the francisco then the francisco is not helmeted. If the remus vegetate the francisco then the remus palsy the francisco. If something vegetate the francisco and it palsy the francisco then the francisco is not sanctified. If the remus palsy the francisco and the francisco does not need the remus then the francisco does not like the remus. If something vegetate the francisco then it is sanctified. The remus does not need the francisco.", "logic": "\nPalsy(francisco, remus)\nSaxicoline(remus)\nforall x (Palsy(x, remus) -> Vegetate(remus, francisco))\nforall x (Vegetate(x, remus) -> not Vegetate(remus, francisco))\nWeensy(remus) -> Mucinoid(remus)\nShadowbox(remus, francisco) -> not Helmeted(francisco)\nVegetate(remus, francisco) -> Palsy(remus, francisco)\nforall x (Vegetate(x, francisco) and Palsy(x, francisco) -> not Sanctified(francisco))\nPalsy(remus, francisco) and not Palsy(francisco, remus) -> not Vegetate(francisco, remus)\nforall x (Vegetate(x, francisco) -> Sanctified(x))\n\nnot Palsy(remus, francisco)\n\nPalsy(francisco, remus) and forall x (Palsy(x, remus) -> Vegetate(remus, francisco)) -> therefore Vegetate(remus, francisco) Vegetate(remus, francisco) and Vegetate(remus, francisco) -> Palsy(remus, francisco) -> therefore Palsy(remus, francisco)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The roddy lock the sigfried. The sigfried is prepaid. If something lock the sigfried then the sigfried tape the roddy. If something tape the sigfried then the sigfried does not like the roddy. If the sigfried is snotty then the sigfried is euphoric. If the sigfried pervert the roddy then the roddy is not dionysian. If the sigfried tape the roddy then the sigfried lock the roddy. If something tape the roddy and it lock the roddy then the roddy is not fusiform. If the sigfried lock the roddy and the roddy does not need the sigfried then the roddy does not like the sigfried. If something tape the roddy then it is fusiform. The roddy is not fusiform.", "logic": "\nLock(roddy, sigfried)\nPrepaid(sigfried)\nforall x (Lock(x, sigfried) -> Tape(sigfried, roddy))\nforall x (Tape(x, sigfried) -> not Tape(sigfried, roddy))\nSnotty(sigfried) -> Euphoric(sigfried)\nPervert(sigfried, roddy) -> not Dionysian(roddy)\nTape(sigfried, roddy) -> Lock(sigfried, roddy)\nforall x (Tape(x, roddy) and Lock(x, roddy) -> not Fusiform(roddy))\nLock(sigfried, roddy) and not Lock(roddy, sigfried) -> not Tape(roddy, sigfried)\nforall x (Tape(x, roddy) -> Fusiform(x))\n\nnot Fusiform(roddy)\n\nLock(roddy, sigfried) and forall x (Lock(x, sigfried) -> Tape(sigfried, roddy)) -> therefore Tape(sigfried, roddy) Lock(roddy, sigfried) and forall x (Lock(x, sigfried) -> Tape(sigfried, roddy)) -> therefore Tape(sigfried, roddy) Tape(sigfried, roddy) and Tape(sigfried, roddy) -> Lock(sigfried, roddy) -> therefore Lock(sigfried, roddy) Tape(sigfried, roddy) and Lock(sigfried, roddy) and forall x (Tape(x, roddy) and Lock(x, roddy) -> not Fusiform(roddy)) -> therefore not Fusiform(roddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The clarence caponise the verile. The verile is baking. If something caponise the verile then the verile backpedal the clarence. If something backpedal the verile then the verile does not like the clarence. If the verile is bullish then the verile is streetwise. If the verile date the clarence then the clarence is not avowed. If the verile backpedal the clarence then the verile caponise the clarence. If something backpedal the clarence and it caponise the clarence then the clarence is not courtly. If the verile caponise the clarence and the clarence does not need the verile then the clarence does not like the verile. If something backpedal the clarence then it is courtly. The clarence is courtly.", "logic": "\nCaponise(clarence, verile)\nBaking(verile)\nforall x (Caponise(x, verile) -> Backpedal(verile, clarence))\nforall x (Backpedal(x, verile) -> not Backpedal(verile, clarence))\nBullish(verile) -> Streetwise(verile)\nDate(verile, clarence) -> not Avowed(clarence)\nBackpedal(verile, clarence) -> Caponise(verile, clarence)\nforall x (Backpedal(x, clarence) and Caponise(x, clarence) -> not Courtly(clarence))\nCaponise(verile, clarence) and not Caponise(clarence, verile) -> not Backpedal(clarence, verile)\nforall x (Backpedal(x, clarence) -> Courtly(x))\n\nCourtly(clarence)\n\nCaponise(clarence, verile) and forall x (Caponise(x, verile) -> Backpedal(verile, clarence)) -> therefore Backpedal(verile, clarence) Caponise(clarence, verile) and forall x (Caponise(x, verile) -> Backpedal(verile, clarence)) -> therefore Backpedal(verile, clarence) Backpedal(verile, clarence) and Backpedal(verile, clarence) -> Caponise(verile, clarence) -> therefore Caponise(verile, clarence) Backpedal(verile, clarence) and Caponise(verile, clarence) and forall x (Backpedal(x, clarence) and Caponise(x, clarence) -> not Courtly(clarence)) -> therefore not Courtly(clarence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The anastasie church the price. The price is dissuasive. If something church the price then the price mail the anastasie. If something mail the price then the price does not like the anastasie. If the price is loving then the price is bicorn. If the price suck the anastasie then the anastasie is not enteric. If the price mail the anastasie then the price church the anastasie. If something mail the anastasie and it church the anastasie then the anastasie is not cuplike. If the price church the anastasie and the anastasie does not need the price then the anastasie does not like the price. If something mail the anastasie then it is cuplike. The price is not bicorn.", "logic": "\nChurch(anastasie, price)\nDissuasive(price)\nforall x (Church(x, price) -> Mail(price, anastasie))\nforall x (Mail(x, price) -> not Mail(price, anastasie))\nLoving(price) -> Bicorn(price)\nSuck(price, anastasie) -> not Enteric(anastasie)\nMail(price, anastasie) -> Church(price, anastasie)\nforall x (Mail(x, anastasie) and Church(x, anastasie) -> not Cuplike(anastasie))\nChurch(price, anastasie) and not Church(anastasie, price) -> not Mail(anastasie, price)\nforall x (Mail(x, anastasie) -> Cuplike(x))\n\nnot Bicorn(price)\n\nLoving(price) -> Bicorn(price) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The park tumesce the melantha. The melantha is reflexive. If something tumesce the melantha then the melantha evangelize the park. If something evangelize the melantha then the melantha does not like the park. If the melantha is neither then the melantha is somber. If the melantha overstrain the park then the park is not stripped. If the melantha evangelize the park then the melantha tumesce the park. If something evangelize the park and it tumesce the park then the park is not costate. If the melantha tumesce the park and the park does not need the melantha then the park does not like the melantha. If something evangelize the park then it is costate. The park is somber.", "logic": "\nTumesce(park, melantha)\nReflexive(melantha)\nforall x (Tumesce(x, melantha) -> Evangelize(melantha, park))\nforall x (Evangelize(x, melantha) -> not Evangelize(melantha, park))\nNeither(melantha) -> Somber(melantha)\nOverstrain(melantha, park) -> not Stripped(park)\nEvangelize(melantha, park) -> Tumesce(melantha, park)\nforall x (Evangelize(x, park) and Tumesce(x, park) -> not Costate(park))\nTumesce(melantha, park) and not Tumesce(park, melantha) -> not Evangelize(park, melantha)\nforall x (Evangelize(x, park) -> Costate(x))\n\nSomber(park)\n\nSomber(park) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The vincent skreigh the sharon. The sharon is bragging. If something skreigh the sharon then the sharon morph the vincent. If something morph the sharon then the sharon does not like the vincent. If the sharon is placatory then the sharon is enclosed. If the sharon comport the vincent then the vincent is not boughed. If the sharon morph the vincent then the sharon skreigh the vincent. If something morph the vincent and it skreigh the vincent then the vincent is not game. If the sharon skreigh the vincent and the vincent does not need the sharon then the vincent does not like the sharon. If something morph the vincent then it is game. The vincent does not chase the vincent.", "logic": "\nSkreigh(vincent, sharon)\nBragging(sharon)\nforall x (Skreigh(x, sharon) -> Morph(sharon, vincent))\nforall x (Morph(x, sharon) -> not Morph(sharon, vincent))\nPlacatory(sharon) -> Enclosed(sharon)\nComport(sharon, vincent) -> not Boughed(vincent)\nMorph(sharon, vincent) -> Skreigh(sharon, vincent)\nforall x (Morph(x, vincent) and Skreigh(x, vincent) -> not Game(vincent))\nSkreigh(sharon, vincent) and not Skreigh(vincent, sharon) -> not Morph(vincent, sharon)\nforall x (Morph(x, vincent) -> Game(x))\n\nnot Comport(vincent, vincent)\n\nnot Comport(vincent, vincent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The hasty cinematise the zahara. The zahara is moblike. If something cinematise the zahara then the zahara explicate the hasty. If something explicate the zahara then the zahara does not like the hasty. If the zahara is fitted then the zahara is wily. If the zahara encumber the hasty then the hasty is not roast. If the zahara explicate the hasty then the zahara cinematise the hasty. If something explicate the hasty and it cinematise the hasty then the hasty is not ready. If the zahara cinematise the hasty and the hasty does not need the zahara then the hasty does not like the zahara. If something explicate the hasty then it is ready. The hasty cinematise the hasty.", "logic": "\nCinematise(hasty, zahara)\nMoblike(zahara)\nforall x (Cinematise(x, zahara) -> Explicate(zahara, hasty))\nforall x (Explicate(x, zahara) -> not Explicate(zahara, hasty))\nFitted(zahara) -> Wily(zahara)\nEncumber(zahara, hasty) -> not Roast(hasty)\nExplicate(zahara, hasty) -> Cinematise(zahara, hasty)\nforall x (Explicate(x, hasty) and Cinematise(x, hasty) -> not Ready(hasty))\nCinematise(zahara, hasty) and not Cinematise(hasty, zahara) -> not Explicate(hasty, zahara)\nforall x (Explicate(x, hasty) -> Ready(x))\n\nCinematise(hasty, hasty)\n\nCinematise(hasty, hasty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The elliot misgive the sib. The sib is lxxi. If something misgive the sib then the sib checkmate the elliot. If something checkmate the sib then the sib does not like the elliot. If the sib is euphonical then the sib is northward. If the sib hedgehop the elliot then the elliot is not lucullan. If the sib checkmate the elliot then the sib misgive the elliot. If something checkmate the elliot and it misgive the elliot then the elliot is not bushed. If the sib misgive the elliot and the elliot does not need the sib then the elliot does not like the sib. If something checkmate the elliot then it is bushed. The sib does not like the sib.", "logic": "\nMisgive(elliot, sib)\nLxxi(sib)\nforall x (Misgive(x, sib) -> Checkmate(sib, elliot))\nforall x (Checkmate(x, sib) -> not Checkmate(sib, elliot))\nEuphonical(sib) -> Northward(sib)\nHedgehop(sib, elliot) -> not Lucullan(elliot)\nCheckmate(sib, elliot) -> Misgive(sib, elliot)\nforall x (Checkmate(x, elliot) and Misgive(x, elliot) -> not Bushed(elliot))\nMisgive(sib, elliot) and not Misgive(elliot, sib) -> not Checkmate(elliot, sib)\nforall x (Checkmate(x, elliot) -> Bushed(x))\n\nnot Checkmate(sib, sib)\n\nnot Checkmate(sib, sib) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The nicole reify the ralph. The ralph is seeping. If something reify the ralph then the ralph scandalize the nicole. If something scandalize the ralph then the ralph does not like the nicole. If the ralph is quartzose then the ralph is caffeinic. If the ralph equalize the nicole then the nicole is not beltless. If the ralph scandalize the nicole then the ralph reify the nicole. If something scandalize the nicole and it reify the nicole then the nicole is not curricular. If the ralph reify the nicole and the nicole does not need the ralph then the nicole does not like the ralph. If something scandalize the nicole then it is curricular. The nicole equalize the ralph.", "logic": "\nReify(nicole, ralph)\nSeeping(ralph)\nforall x (Reify(x, ralph) -> Scandalize(ralph, nicole))\nforall x (Scandalize(x, ralph) -> not Scandalize(ralph, nicole))\nQuartzose(ralph) -> Caffeinic(ralph)\nEqualize(ralph, nicole) -> not Beltless(nicole)\nScandalize(ralph, nicole) -> Reify(ralph, nicole)\nforall x (Scandalize(x, nicole) and Reify(x, nicole) -> not Curricular(nicole))\nReify(ralph, nicole) and not Reify(nicole, ralph) -> not Scandalize(nicole, ralph)\nforall x (Scandalize(x, nicole) -> Curricular(x))\n\nEqualize(nicole, ralph)\n\nEqualize(nicole, ralph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The sibella screak the harriot. The harriot is trabecular. If something screak the harriot then the harriot forbid the sibella. If something forbid the harriot then the harriot does not like the sibella. If the harriot is aired then the harriot is geodesic. If the harriot denigrate the sibella then the sibella is not splashy. If the harriot forbid the sibella then the harriot screak the sibella. If something forbid the sibella and it screak the sibella then the sibella is not unplayable. If the harriot screak the sibella and the sibella does not need the harriot then the sibella does not like the harriot. If something forbid the sibella then it is unplayable. The harriot does not need the harriot.", "logic": "\nScreak(sibella, harriot)\nTrabecular(harriot)\nforall x (Screak(x, harriot) -> Forbid(harriot, sibella))\nforall x (Forbid(x, harriot) -> not Forbid(harriot, sibella))\nAired(harriot) -> Geodesic(harriot)\nDenigrate(harriot, sibella) -> not Splashy(sibella)\nForbid(harriot, sibella) -> Screak(harriot, sibella)\nforall x (Forbid(x, sibella) and Screak(x, sibella) -> not Unplayable(sibella))\nScreak(harriot, sibella) and not Screak(sibella, harriot) -> not Forbid(sibella, harriot)\nforall x (Forbid(x, sibella) -> Unplayable(x))\n\nnot Screak(harriot, harriot)\n\nnot Screak(harriot, harriot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The hanni iodise the joyce. The joyce is habitable. If something iodise the joyce then the joyce moralise the hanni. If something moralise the joyce then the joyce does not like the hanni. If the joyce is prodromal then the joyce is amnesiac. If the joyce outfit the hanni then the hanni is not peltate. If the joyce moralise the hanni then the joyce iodise the hanni. If something moralise the hanni and it iodise the hanni then the hanni is not unmanned. If the joyce iodise the hanni and the hanni does not need the joyce then the hanni does not like the joyce. If something moralise the hanni then it is unmanned. The hanni moralise the joyce.", "logic": "\nIodise(hanni, joyce)\nHabitable(joyce)\nforall x (Iodise(x, joyce) -> Moralise(joyce, hanni))\nforall x (Moralise(x, joyce) -> not Moralise(joyce, hanni))\nProdromal(joyce) -> Amnesiac(joyce)\nOutfit(joyce, hanni) -> not Peltate(hanni)\nMoralise(joyce, hanni) -> Iodise(joyce, hanni)\nforall x (Moralise(x, hanni) and Iodise(x, hanni) -> not Unmanned(hanni))\nIodise(joyce, hanni) and not Iodise(hanni, joyce) -> not Moralise(hanni, joyce)\nforall x (Moralise(x, hanni) -> Unmanned(x))\n\nMoralise(hanni, joyce)\n\nMoralise(hanni, joyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "Madelene is asexual. Stan is granted. All asexual things are epic. If something is epic then it is livable. Rough things are parvenu. If something is livable and not asexual then it is not granted. If something is advised then it is finespun. If something is advised and livable then it is finespun. If something is livable then it is finespun. If Stan is not livable then Stan is advised. Stan is granted.", "logic": "\nAsexual(madelene)\nGranted(stan)\nforall x (Asexual(x) -> Epic(x))\nforall x (Epic(x) -> Livable(x))\nforall x (Asexual(x) -> Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Livable(x) and not Asexual(x) -> not Granted(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Finespun(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) and Livable(x) -> Finespun(x))\nforall x (Livable(x) -> Finespun(x))\nnot Livable(stan) -> Advised(stan)\n\nGranted(stan)\n\ntherefore Granted(stan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Roxanna is reticular. Meagan is fringed. All reticular things are uruguayan. If something is uruguayan then it is defeasible. Rough things are stalkless. If something is defeasible and not reticular then it is not fringed. If something is wiry then it is needful. If something is wiry and defeasible then it is needful. If something is defeasible then it is needful. If Meagan is not defeasible then Meagan is wiry. Meagan is not fringed.", "logic": "\nReticular(roxanna)\nFringed(meagan)\nforall x (Reticular(x) -> Uruguayan(x))\nforall x (Uruguayan(x) -> Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Reticular(x) -> Stalkless(x))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and not Reticular(x) -> not Fringed(x))\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Needful(x))\nforall x (Wiry(x) and Defeasible(x) -> Needful(x))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) -> Needful(x))\nnot Defeasible(meagan) -> Wiry(meagan)\n\nnot Fringed(meagan)\n\ntherefore Fringed(meagan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Karyn is balsamic. Malvina is meaningful. All balsamic things are unchanged. If something is unchanged then it is static. Rough things are poetical. If something is static and not balsamic then it is not meaningful. If something is sneezy then it is cresson. If something is sneezy and static then it is cresson. If something is static then it is cresson. If Malvina is not static then Malvina is sneezy. Karyn is poetical.", "logic": "\nBalsamic(karyn)\nMeaningful(malvina)\nforall x (Balsamic(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) -> Static(x))\nforall x (Balsamic(x) -> Poetical(x))\nforall x (Static(x) and not Balsamic(x) -> not Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) and Static(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Static(x) -> Cresson(x))\nnot Static(malvina) -> Sneezy(malvina)\n\nPoetical(karyn)\n\nBalsamic(karyn) and forall x (Balsamic(x) -> Poetical(x)) -> therefore Poetical(karyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Fancy is cuneiform. Anett is insincere. All cuneiform things are obnoxious. If something is obnoxious then it is suspected. Rough things are ferned. If something is suspected and not cuneiform then it is not insincere. If something is leisurely then it is cycloidal. If something is leisurely and suspected then it is cycloidal. If something is suspected then it is cycloidal. If Anett is not suspected then Anett is leisurely. Fancy is not obnoxious.", "logic": "\nCuneiform(fancy)\nInsincere(anett)\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Obnoxious(x))\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) -> Suspected(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Ferned(x))\nforall x (Suspected(x) and not Cuneiform(x) -> not Insincere(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Cycloidal(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) and Suspected(x) -> Cycloidal(x))\nforall x (Suspected(x) -> Cycloidal(x))\nnot Suspected(anett) -> Leisurely(anett)\n\nnot Obnoxious(fancy)\n\nCuneiform(fancy) and forall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Obnoxious(x)) -> therefore Obnoxious(fancy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Christian is laughing. Toinette is deft. All laughing things are ossiculate. If something is ossiculate then it is statewide. Rough things are none. If something is statewide and not laughing then it is not deft. If something is dissonant then it is effective. If something is dissonant and statewide then it is effective. If something is statewide then it is effective. If Toinette is not statewide then Toinette is dissonant. Christian is statewide.", "logic": "\nLaughing(christian)\nDeft(toinette)\nforall x (Laughing(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Statewide(x))\nforall x (Laughing(x) -> None(x))\nforall x (Statewide(x) and not Laughing(x) -> not Deft(x))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Effective(x))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) and Statewide(x) -> Effective(x))\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> Effective(x))\nnot Statewide(toinette) -> Dissonant(toinette)\n\nStatewide(christian)\n\nLaughing(christian) and forall x (Laughing(x) -> Ossiculate(x)) -> therefore Ossiculate(christian) Ossiculate(christian) and forall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Statewide(x)) -> therefore Statewide(christian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Janetta is subdued. Leorah is demulcent. All subdued things are lentic. If something is lentic then it is hopeless. Rough things are returnable. If something is hopeless and not subdued then it is not demulcent. If something is tantrik then it is tubercular. If something is tantrik and hopeless then it is tubercular. If something is hopeless then it is tubercular. If Leorah is not hopeless then Leorah is tantrik. Janetta is not hopeless.", "logic": "\nSubdued(janetta)\nDemulcent(leorah)\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Hopeless(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Returnable(x))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) and not Subdued(x) -> not Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) and Hopeless(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) -> Tubercular(x))\nnot Hopeless(leorah) -> Tantrik(leorah)\n\nnot Hopeless(janetta)\n\nSubdued(janetta) and forall x (Subdued(x) -> Lentic(x)) -> therefore Lentic(janetta) Lentic(janetta) and forall x (Lentic(x) -> Hopeless(x)) -> therefore Hopeless(janetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Hope is bygone. Florry is undeterred. All bygone things are ruttish. If something is ruttish then it is alated. Rough things are fried. If something is alated and not bygone then it is not undeterred. If something is wildcat then it is realised. If something is wildcat and alated then it is realised. If something is alated then it is realised. If Florry is not alated then Florry is wildcat. Hope is realised.", "logic": "\nBygone(hope)\nUndeterred(florry)\nforall x (Bygone(x) -> Ruttish(x))\nforall x (Ruttish(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Bygone(x) -> Fried(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) and not Bygone(x) -> not Undeterred(x))\nforall x (Wildcat(x) -> Realised(x))\nforall x (Wildcat(x) and Alated(x) -> Realised(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Realised(x))\nnot Alated(florry) -> Wildcat(florry)\n\nRealised(hope)\n\nBygone(hope) and forall x (Bygone(x) -> Ruttish(x)) -> therefore Ruttish(hope) Ruttish(hope) and forall x (Ruttish(x) -> Alated(x)) -> therefore Alated(hope) Alated(hope) and forall x (Alated(x) -> Realised(x)) -> therefore Realised(hope)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Lusa is consistent. Valene is talentless. All consistent things are jihadi. If something is jihadi then it is saprobic. Rough things are smoothbore. If something is saprobic and not consistent then it is not talentless. If something is galore then it is measly. If something is galore and saprobic then it is measly. If something is saprobic then it is measly. If Valene is not saprobic then Valene is galore. Lusa is not measly.", "logic": "\nConsistent(lusa)\nTalentless(valene)\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Jihadi(x))\nforall x (Jihadi(x) -> Saprobic(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Saprobic(x) and not Consistent(x) -> not Talentless(x))\nforall x (Galore(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Galore(x) and Saprobic(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Saprobic(x) -> Measly(x))\nnot Saprobic(valene) -> Galore(valene)\n\nnot Measly(lusa)\n\nConsistent(lusa) and forall x (Consistent(x) -> Jihadi(x)) -> therefore Jihadi(lusa) Jihadi(lusa) and forall x (Jihadi(x) -> Saprobic(x)) -> therefore Saprobic(lusa) Saprobic(lusa) and forall x (Saprobic(x) -> Measly(x)) -> therefore Measly(lusa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Dione is exhausted. Reggis is serbian. All exhausted things are basined. If something is basined then it is isocyclic. Rough things are unanimated. If something is isocyclic and not exhausted then it is not serbian. If something is bally then it is semiotic. If something is bally and isocyclic then it is semiotic. If something is isocyclic then it is semiotic. If Reggis is not isocyclic then Reggis is bally. Reggis is not isocyclic.", "logic": "\nExhausted(dione)\nSerbian(reggis)\nforall x (Exhausted(x) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Basined(x) -> Isocyclic(x))\nforall x (Exhausted(x) -> Unanimated(x))\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) and not Exhausted(x) -> not Serbian(x))\nforall x (Bally(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nforall x (Bally(x) and Isocyclic(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nnot Isocyclic(reggis) -> Bally(reggis)\n\nnot Isocyclic(reggis)\n\nforall x (Basined(x) -> Isocyclic(x)) <- forall x (Exhausted(x) -> Basined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Johnna is isotopic. Consuelo is west. All isotopic things are tutelary. If something is tutelary then it is rambling. Rough things are immature. If something is rambling and not isotopic then it is not west. If something is xlii then it is unfeeling. If something is xlii and rambling then it is unfeeling. If something is rambling then it is unfeeling. If Consuelo is not rambling then Consuelo is xlii. Consuelo is tutelary.", "logic": "\nIsotopic(johnna)\nWest(consuelo)\nforall x (Isotopic(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Tutelary(x) -> Rambling(x))\nforall x (Isotopic(x) -> Immature(x))\nforall x (Rambling(x) and not Isotopic(x) -> not West(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) and Rambling(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Rambling(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nnot Rambling(consuelo) -> Xlii(consuelo)\n\nTutelary(consuelo)\n\nforall x (Isotopic(x) -> Tutelary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Tiena is unposed. Husain is azotemic. All unposed things are shrill. If something is shrill then it is weepy. Rough things are matted. If something is weepy and not unposed then it is not azotemic. If something is musical then it is stationary. If something is musical and weepy then it is stationary. If something is weepy then it is stationary. If Husain is not weepy then Husain is musical. Husain is not musical.", "logic": "\nUnposed(tiena)\nAzotemic(husain)\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Shrill(x))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Matted(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) and not Unposed(x) -> not Azotemic(x))\nforall x (Musical(x) -> Stationary(x))\nforall x (Musical(x) and Weepy(x) -> Stationary(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Stationary(x))\nnot Weepy(husain) -> Musical(husain)\n\nnot Musical(husain)\n\nnot Weepy(husain) -> Musical(husain) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Emelda is vacillant. Rosaleen is exanimate. All vacillant things are adaptative. If something is adaptative then it is awnless. Rough things are agaze. If something is awnless and not vacillant then it is not exanimate. If something is purplish then it is naturistic. If something is purplish and awnless then it is naturistic. If something is awnless then it is naturistic. If Rosaleen is not awnless then Rosaleen is purplish. Rosaleen is naturistic.", "logic": "\nVacillant(emelda)\nExanimate(rosaleen)\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Adaptative(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Awnless(x))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Agaze(x))\nforall x (Awnless(x) and not Vacillant(x) -> not Exanimate(x))\nforall x (Purplish(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Purplish(x) and Awnless(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nnot Awnless(rosaleen) -> Purplish(rosaleen)\n\nNaturistic(rosaleen)\n\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Naturistic(x)) <- forall x (Adaptative(x) -> Awnless(x)) <- forall x (Vacillant(x) -> Adaptative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Godfrey is saute. Maura is ungulated. All saute things are miniature. If something is miniature then it is impassable. Rough things are ensiform. If something is impassable and not saute then it is not ungulated. If something is domestic then it is blest. If something is domestic and impassable then it is blest. If something is impassable then it is blest. If Maura is not impassable then Maura is domestic. Maura is not saute.", "logic": "\nSaute(godfrey)\nUngulated(maura)\nforall x (Saute(x) -> Miniature(x))\nforall x (Miniature(x) -> Impassable(x))\nforall x (Saute(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) and not Saute(x) -> not Ungulated(x))\nforall x (Domestic(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Domestic(x) and Impassable(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Blest(x))\nnot Impassable(maura) -> Domestic(maura)\n\nnot Saute(maura)\n\nnot Saute(maura) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Kalle is unrequited. Garp is stocky. All unrequited things are jewelled. If something is jewelled then it is akimbo. Rough things are squared. If something is akimbo and not unrequited then it is not stocky. If something is noxious then it is tiered. If something is noxious and akimbo then it is tiered. If something is akimbo then it is tiered. If Garp is not akimbo then Garp is noxious. Kalle is stocky.", "logic": "\nUnrequited(kalle)\nStocky(garp)\nforall x (Unrequited(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Akimbo(x))\nforall x (Unrequited(x) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) and not Unrequited(x) -> not Stocky(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Tiered(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) and Akimbo(x) -> Tiered(x))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Tiered(x))\nnot Akimbo(garp) -> Noxious(garp)\n\nStocky(kalle)\n\nStocky(kalle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "The lynelle is major. All cusped things are catabolic. All rangy things are catabolic. If something is major then it is rangy. If the lynelle is catabolic then the lynelle is bankrupt. Blue things are major. If something is bankrupt then it is major. All catabolic, bankrupt things are major. If the lynelle is catabolic then the lynelle is rangy. The lynelle is major.", "logic": "\nMajor(lynelle)\nforall x (Cusped(x) -> Catabolic(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> Catabolic(x))\nforall x (Major(x) -> Rangy(x))\nCatabolic(lynelle) -> Bankrupt(lynelle)\nforall x (Cusped(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Catabolic(x) and Bankrupt(x) -> Major(x))\nCatabolic(lynelle) -> Rangy(lynelle)\n\nMajor(lynelle)\n\ntherefore Major(lynelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The barbara is cesarian. All indistinct things are seasonable. All cognizable things are seasonable. If something is cesarian then it is cognizable. If the barbara is seasonable then the barbara is nilotic. Blue things are cesarian. If something is nilotic then it is cesarian. All seasonable, nilotic things are cesarian. If the barbara is seasonable then the barbara is cognizable. The barbara is not cesarian.", "logic": "\nCesarian(barbara)\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> Seasonable(x))\nforall x (Cognizable(x) -> Seasonable(x))\nforall x (Cesarian(x) -> Cognizable(x))\nSeasonable(barbara) -> Nilotic(barbara)\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> Cesarian(x))\nforall x (Nilotic(x) -> Cesarian(x))\nforall x (Seasonable(x) and Nilotic(x) -> Cesarian(x))\nSeasonable(barbara) -> Cognizable(barbara)\n\nnot Cesarian(barbara)\n\ntherefore Cesarian(barbara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The britaney is draped. All meditative things are pinnatifid. All enolic things are pinnatifid. If something is draped then it is enolic. If the britaney is pinnatifid then the britaney is numidian. Blue things are draped. If something is numidian then it is draped. All pinnatifid, numidian things are draped. If the britaney is pinnatifid then the britaney is enolic. The britaney is enolic.", "logic": "\nDraped(britaney)\nforall x (Meditative(x) -> Pinnatifid(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) -> Pinnatifid(x))\nforall x (Draped(x) -> Enolic(x))\nPinnatifid(britaney) -> Numidian(britaney)\nforall x (Meditative(x) -> Draped(x))\nforall x (Numidian(x) -> Draped(x))\nforall x (Pinnatifid(x) and Numidian(x) -> Draped(x))\nPinnatifid(britaney) -> Enolic(britaney)\n\nEnolic(britaney)\n\nDraped(britaney) and forall x (Draped(x) -> Enolic(x)) -> therefore Enolic(britaney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The baily is petite. All billed things are aggregated. All validating things are aggregated. If something is petite then it is validating. If the baily is aggregated then the baily is lossy. Blue things are petite. If something is lossy then it is petite. All aggregated, lossy things are petite. If the baily is aggregated then the baily is validating. The baily is not validating.", "logic": "\nPetite(baily)\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nforall x (Petite(x) -> Validating(x))\nAggregated(baily) -> Lossy(baily)\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Petite(x))\nforall x (Lossy(x) -> Petite(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) and Lossy(x) -> Petite(x))\nAggregated(baily) -> Validating(baily)\n\nnot Validating(baily)\n\nPetite(baily) and forall x (Petite(x) -> Validating(x)) -> therefore Validating(baily)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The inge is basinal. All unpointed things are wisplike. All quilted things are wisplike. If something is basinal then it is quilted. If the inge is wisplike then the inge is vexing. Blue things are basinal. If something is vexing then it is basinal. All wisplike, vexing things are basinal. If the inge is wisplike then the inge is quilted. The inge is wisplike.", "logic": "\nBasinal(inge)\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Wisplike(x))\nforall x (Quilted(x) -> Wisplike(x))\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Quilted(x))\nWisplike(inge) -> Vexing(inge)\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Vexing(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Wisplike(x) and Vexing(x) -> Basinal(x))\nWisplike(inge) -> Quilted(inge)\n\nWisplike(inge)\n\nBasinal(inge) and forall x (Basinal(x) -> Quilted(x)) -> therefore Quilted(inge) Quilted(inge) and forall x (Quilted(x) -> Wisplike(x)) -> therefore Wisplike(inge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The myke is intricate. All imploring things are halt. All amalgamate things are halt. If something is intricate then it is amalgamate. If the myke is halt then the myke is belittled. Blue things are intricate. If something is belittled then it is intricate. All halt, belittled things are intricate. If the myke is halt then the myke is amalgamate. The myke is not halt.", "logic": "\nIntricate(myke)\nforall x (Imploring(x) -> Halt(x))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x) -> Halt(x))\nforall x (Intricate(x) -> Amalgamate(x))\nHalt(myke) -> Belittled(myke)\nforall x (Imploring(x) -> Intricate(x))\nforall x (Belittled(x) -> Intricate(x))\nforall x (Halt(x) and Belittled(x) -> Intricate(x))\nHalt(myke) -> Amalgamate(myke)\n\nnot Halt(myke)\n\nIntricate(myke) and forall x (Intricate(x) -> Amalgamate(x)) -> therefore Amalgamate(myke) Amalgamate(myke) and forall x (Amalgamate(x) -> Halt(x)) -> therefore Halt(myke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The lolande is frayed. All noncyclic things are mobbish. All schmalzy things are mobbish. If something is frayed then it is schmalzy. If the lolande is mobbish then the lolande is cometic. Blue things are frayed. If something is cometic then it is frayed. All mobbish, cometic things are frayed. If the lolande is mobbish then the lolande is schmalzy. The lolande is cometic.", "logic": "\nFrayed(lolande)\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Schmalzy(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Frayed(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\nMobbish(lolande) -> Cometic(lolande)\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Frayed(x))\nforall x (Cometic(x) -> Frayed(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and Cometic(x) -> Frayed(x))\nMobbish(lolande) -> Schmalzy(lolande)\n\nCometic(lolande)\n\nFrayed(lolande) and forall x (Frayed(x) -> Schmalzy(x)) -> therefore Schmalzy(lolande) Schmalzy(lolande) and forall x (Schmalzy(x) -> Mobbish(x)) -> therefore Mobbish(lolande) Mobbish(lolande) and Mobbish(lolande) -> Cometic(lolande) -> therefore Cometic(lolande)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The zelma is unspoiled. All silenced things are raffish. All ismaili things are raffish. If something is unspoiled then it is ismaili. If the zelma is raffish then the zelma is unbigoted. Blue things are unspoiled. If something is unbigoted then it is unspoiled. All raffish, unbigoted things are unspoiled. If the zelma is raffish then the zelma is ismaili. The zelma is not unbigoted.", "logic": "\nUnspoiled(zelma)\nforall x (Silenced(x) -> Raffish(x))\nforall x (Ismaili(x) -> Raffish(x))\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nRaffish(zelma) -> Unbigoted(zelma)\nforall x (Silenced(x) -> Unspoiled(x))\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Unspoiled(x))\nforall x (Raffish(x) and Unbigoted(x) -> Unspoiled(x))\nRaffish(zelma) -> Ismaili(zelma)\n\nnot Unbigoted(zelma)\n\nUnspoiled(zelma) and forall x (Unspoiled(x) -> Ismaili(x)) -> therefore Ismaili(zelma) Ismaili(zelma) and forall x (Ismaili(x) -> Raffish(x)) -> therefore Raffish(zelma) Raffish(zelma) and Raffish(zelma) -> Unbigoted(zelma) -> therefore Unbigoted(zelma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The rinaldo is informal. All external things are bedaubed. All rooted things are bedaubed. If something is informal then it is rooted. If the rinaldo is bedaubed then the rinaldo is smug. Blue things are informal. If something is smug then it is informal. All bedaubed, smug things are informal. If the rinaldo is bedaubed then the rinaldo is rooted. The rinaldo does not see the rinaldo.", "logic": "\nInformal(rinaldo)\nforall x (External(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Rooted(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Rooted(x))\nBedaubed(rinaldo) -> Smug(rinaldo)\nforall x (External(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Smug(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) and Smug(x) -> Informal(x))\nBedaubed(rinaldo) -> Rooted(rinaldo)\n\nnot Sees(rinaldo, rinaldo)\n\nnot Sees(rinaldo, rinaldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The nathan is metal. All valvular things are tonal. All springy things are tonal. If something is metal then it is springy. If the nathan is tonal then the nathan is ferrous. Blue things are metal. If something is ferrous then it is metal. All tonal, ferrous things are metal. If the nathan is tonal then the nathan is springy. The nathan likes the nathan.", "logic": "\nMetal(nathan)\nforall x (Valvular(x) -> Tonal(x))\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Tonal(x))\nforall x (Metal(x) -> Springy(x))\nTonal(nathan) -> Ferrous(nathan)\nforall x (Valvular(x) -> Metal(x))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Metal(x))\nforall x (Tonal(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Metal(x))\nTonal(nathan) -> Springy(nathan)\n\nLikes(nathan, nathan)\n\nLikes(nathan, nathan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The lorraine is aureate. All balletic things are fluffy. All abridged things are fluffy. If something is aureate then it is abridged. If the lorraine is fluffy then the lorraine is colorless. Blue things are aureate. If something is colorless then it is aureate. All fluffy, colorless things are aureate. If the lorraine is fluffy then the lorraine is abridged. The lorraine is not balletic.", "logic": "\nAureate(lorraine)\nforall x (Balletic(x) -> Fluffy(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Fluffy(x))\nforall x (Aureate(x) -> Abridged(x))\nFluffy(lorraine) -> Colorless(lorraine)\nforall x (Balletic(x) -> Aureate(x))\nforall x (Colorless(x) -> Aureate(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) and Colorless(x) -> Aureate(x))\nFluffy(lorraine) -> Abridged(lorraine)\n\nnot Balletic(lorraine)\n\nnot Balletic(lorraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The ronen is unwanted. All metacarpal things are mental. All oracular things are mental. If something is unwanted then it is oracular. If the ronen is mental then the ronen is disgustful. Blue things are unwanted. If something is disgustful then it is unwanted. All mental, disgustful things are unwanted. If the ronen is mental then the ronen is oracular. The ronen chases the ronen.", "logic": "\nUnwanted(ronen)\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) -> Mental(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Mental(x))\nforall x (Unwanted(x) -> Oracular(x))\nMental(ronen) -> Disgustful(ronen)\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) -> Unwanted(x))\nforall x (Disgustful(x) -> Unwanted(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) and Disgustful(x) -> Unwanted(x))\nMental(ronen) -> Oracular(ronen)\n\nChases(ronen, ronen)\n\nChases(ronen, ronen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The conchita does not chase the daphne. The conchita is initiative. The conchita is fooling. The conchita whiten the daphne. The conchita whiten the finn. The conchita bonderize the finn. The daphne fool the conchita. The daphne is brazilian. The daphne does not like the conchita. The finn is chromatic. The finn is initiative. The finn is clubable. The finn whiten the conchita. The finn whiten the daphne. The finn bonderize the conchita. The finn bonderize the daphne. If someone fool the conchita then they see the finn. If someone fool the finn and the finn whiten the conchita then the conchita does not see the daphne. If someone whiten the finn and they are brazilian then the finn bonderize the daphne. If someone whiten the finn and they are brazilian then they chase the finn. If someone whiten the daphne and the daphne bonderize the finn then the daphne fool the finn. If the daphne fool the conchita then the conchita is initiative. If someone whiten the daphne and they see the finn then the finn fool the daphne. If someone fool the finn and they chase the conchita then the finn is not fooling. The conchita is initiative.", "logic": "\nnot Fool(conchita, daphne)\nInitiative(conchita)\nFooling(conchita)\nWhiten(conchita, daphne)\nWhiten(conchita, finn)\nBonderize(conchita, finn)\nFool(daphne, conchita)\nBrazilian(daphne)\nnot Whiten(daphne, conchita)\nChromatic(finn)\nInitiative(finn)\nClubable(finn)\nWhiten(finn, conchita)\nWhiten(finn, daphne)\nBonderize(finn, conchita)\nBonderize(finn, daphne)\nforall x (Fool(x, conchita) -> Bonderize(x, finn))\nforall x (Fool(x, finn) and Whiten(finn, conchita) -> not Bonderize(conchita, daphne))\nforall x (Whiten(x, finn) and Brazilian(x) -> Bonderize(finn, daphne))\nforall x (Whiten(x, finn) and Brazilian(x) -> Fool(x, finn))\nforall x (Whiten(x, daphne) and Bonderize(daphne, finn) -> Fool(daphne, finn))\nFool(daphne, conchita) -> Initiative(conchita)\nforall x (Whiten(x, daphne) and Bonderize(x, finn) -> Fool(finn, daphne))\nforall x (Fool(x, finn) and Fool(x, conchita) -> not Fooling(finn))\n\nInitiative(conchita)\n\ntherefore Initiative(conchita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The haily does not chase the aura. The haily is burbly. The haily is billed. The haily sliver the aura. The haily sliver the pearle. The haily podcast the pearle. The aura waffle the haily. The aura is alpha. The aura does not like the haily. The pearle is unpowered. The pearle is burbly. The pearle is incorrect. The pearle sliver the haily. The pearle sliver the aura. The pearle podcast the haily. The pearle podcast the aura. If someone waffle the haily then they see the pearle. If someone waffle the pearle and the pearle sliver the haily then the haily does not see the aura. If someone sliver the pearle and they are alpha then the pearle podcast the aura. If someone sliver the pearle and they are alpha then they chase the pearle. If someone sliver the aura and the aura podcast the pearle then the aura waffle the pearle. If the aura waffle the haily then the haily is burbly. If someone sliver the aura and they see the pearle then the pearle waffle the aura. If someone waffle the pearle and they chase the haily then the pearle is not billed. The pearle is not burbly.", "logic": "\nnot Waffle(haily, aura)\nBurbly(haily)\nBilled(haily)\nSliver(haily, aura)\nSliver(haily, pearle)\nPodcast(haily, pearle)\nWaffle(aura, haily)\nAlpha(aura)\nnot Sliver(aura, haily)\nUnpowered(pearle)\nBurbly(pearle)\nIncorrect(pearle)\nSliver(pearle, haily)\nSliver(pearle, aura)\nPodcast(pearle, haily)\nPodcast(pearle, aura)\nforall x (Waffle(x, haily) -> Podcast(x, pearle))\nforall x (Waffle(x, pearle) and Sliver(pearle, haily) -> not Podcast(haily, aura))\nforall x (Sliver(x, pearle) and Alpha(x) -> Podcast(pearle, aura))\nforall x (Sliver(x, pearle) and Alpha(x) -> Waffle(x, pearle))\nforall x (Sliver(x, aura) and Podcast(aura, pearle) -> Waffle(aura, pearle))\nWaffle(aura, haily) -> Burbly(haily)\nforall x (Sliver(x, aura) and Podcast(x, pearle) -> Waffle(pearle, aura))\nforall x (Waffle(x, pearle) and Waffle(x, haily) -> not Billed(pearle))\n\nnot Burbly(pearle)\n\ntherefore Burbly(pearle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The maggie does not chase the lani. The maggie is maimed. The maggie is seventeen. The maggie speculate the lani. The maggie speculate the glory. The maggie complicate the glory. The lani sandblast the maggie. The lani is corrected. The lani does not like the maggie. The glory is wavy. The glory is maimed. The glory is disarming. The glory speculate the maggie. The glory speculate the lani. The glory complicate the maggie. The glory complicate the lani. If someone sandblast the maggie then they see the glory. If someone sandblast the glory and the glory speculate the maggie then the maggie does not see the lani. If someone speculate the glory and they are corrected then the glory complicate the lani. If someone speculate the glory and they are corrected then they chase the glory. If someone speculate the lani and the lani complicate the glory then the lani sandblast the glory. If the lani sandblast the maggie then the maggie is maimed. If someone speculate the lani and they see the glory then the glory sandblast the lani. If someone sandblast the glory and they chase the maggie then the glory is not seventeen. The lani complicate the glory.", "logic": "\nnot Sandblast(maggie, lani)\nMaimed(maggie)\nSeventeen(maggie)\nSpeculate(maggie, lani)\nSpeculate(maggie, glory)\nComplicate(maggie, glory)\nSandblast(lani, maggie)\nCorrected(lani)\nnot Speculate(lani, maggie)\nWavy(glory)\nMaimed(glory)\nDisarming(glory)\nSpeculate(glory, maggie)\nSpeculate(glory, lani)\nComplicate(glory, maggie)\nComplicate(glory, lani)\nforall x (Sandblast(x, maggie) -> Complicate(x, glory))\nforall x (Sandblast(x, glory) and Speculate(glory, maggie) -> not Complicate(maggie, lani))\nforall x (Speculate(x, glory) and Corrected(x) -> Complicate(glory, lani))\nforall x (Speculate(x, glory) and Corrected(x) -> Sandblast(x, glory))\nforall x (Speculate(x, lani) and Complicate(lani, glory) -> Sandblast(lani, glory))\nSandblast(lani, maggie) -> Maimed(maggie)\nforall x (Speculate(x, lani) and Complicate(x, glory) -> Sandblast(glory, lani))\nforall x (Sandblast(x, glory) and Sandblast(x, maggie) -> not Seventeen(glory))\n\nComplicate(lani, glory)\n\nSandblast(lani, maggie) and forall x (Sandblast(x, maggie) -> Complicate(x, glory)) -> therefore Complicate(lani, glory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The berni does not chase the cyrillus. The berni is provisory. The berni is champleve. The berni generalize the cyrillus. The berni generalize the ezekiel. The berni behead the ezekiel. The cyrillus turn the berni. The cyrillus is merry. The cyrillus does not like the berni. The ezekiel is cutthroat. The ezekiel is provisory. The ezekiel is arthritic. The ezekiel generalize the berni. The ezekiel generalize the cyrillus. The ezekiel behead the berni. The ezekiel behead the cyrillus. If someone turn the berni then they see the ezekiel. If someone turn the ezekiel and the ezekiel generalize the berni then the berni does not see the cyrillus. If someone generalize the ezekiel and they are merry then the ezekiel behead the cyrillus. If someone generalize the ezekiel and they are merry then they chase the ezekiel. If someone generalize the cyrillus and the cyrillus behead the ezekiel then the cyrillus turn the ezekiel. If the cyrillus turn the berni then the berni is provisory. If someone generalize the cyrillus and they see the ezekiel then the ezekiel turn the cyrillus. If someone turn the ezekiel and they chase the berni then the ezekiel is not champleve. The cyrillus does not see the ezekiel.", "logic": "\nnot Turn(berni, cyrillus)\nProvisory(berni)\nChampleve(berni)\nGeneralize(berni, cyrillus)\nGeneralize(berni, ezekiel)\nBehead(berni, ezekiel)\nTurn(cyrillus, berni)\nMerry(cyrillus)\nnot Generalize(cyrillus, berni)\nCutthroat(ezekiel)\nProvisory(ezekiel)\nArthritic(ezekiel)\nGeneralize(ezekiel, berni)\nGeneralize(ezekiel, cyrillus)\nBehead(ezekiel, berni)\nBehead(ezekiel, cyrillus)\nforall x (Turn(x, berni) -> Behead(x, ezekiel))\nforall x (Turn(x, ezekiel) and Generalize(ezekiel, berni) -> not Behead(berni, cyrillus))\nforall x (Generalize(x, ezekiel) and Merry(x) -> Behead(ezekiel, cyrillus))\nforall x (Generalize(x, ezekiel) and Merry(x) -> Turn(x, ezekiel))\nforall x (Generalize(x, cyrillus) and Behead(cyrillus, ezekiel) -> Turn(cyrillus, ezekiel))\nTurn(cyrillus, berni) -> Provisory(berni)\nforall x (Generalize(x, cyrillus) and Behead(x, ezekiel) -> Turn(ezekiel, cyrillus))\nforall x (Turn(x, ezekiel) and Turn(x, berni) -> not Champleve(ezekiel))\n\nnot Behead(cyrillus, ezekiel)\n\nTurn(cyrillus, berni) and forall x (Turn(x, berni) -> Behead(x, ezekiel)) -> therefore Behead(cyrillus, ezekiel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The loralie does not chase the vivia. The loralie is exoergic. The loralie is calceolate. The loralie lend the vivia. The loralie lend the reinhold. The loralie stir the reinhold. The vivia shamanise the loralie. The vivia is kashmiri. The vivia does not like the loralie. The reinhold is caespitose. The reinhold is exoergic. The reinhold is hominine. The reinhold lend the loralie. The reinhold lend the vivia. The reinhold stir the loralie. The reinhold stir the vivia. If someone shamanise the loralie then they see the reinhold. If someone shamanise the reinhold and the reinhold lend the loralie then the loralie does not see the vivia. If someone lend the reinhold and they are kashmiri then the reinhold stir the vivia. If someone lend the reinhold and they are kashmiri then they chase the reinhold. If someone lend the vivia and the vivia stir the reinhold then the vivia shamanise the reinhold. If the vivia shamanise the loralie then the loralie is exoergic. If someone lend the vivia and they see the reinhold then the reinhold shamanise the vivia. If someone shamanise the reinhold and they chase the loralie then the reinhold is not calceolate. The vivia shamanise the reinhold.", "logic": "\nnot Shamanise(loralie, vivia)\nExoergic(loralie)\nCalceolate(loralie)\nLend(loralie, vivia)\nLend(loralie, reinhold)\nStir(loralie, reinhold)\nShamanise(vivia, loralie)\nKashmiri(vivia)\nnot Lend(vivia, loralie)\nCaespitose(reinhold)\nExoergic(reinhold)\nHominine(reinhold)\nLend(reinhold, loralie)\nLend(reinhold, vivia)\nStir(reinhold, loralie)\nStir(reinhold, vivia)\nforall x (Shamanise(x, loralie) -> Stir(x, reinhold))\nforall x (Shamanise(x, reinhold) and Lend(reinhold, loralie) -> not Stir(loralie, vivia))\nforall x (Lend(x, reinhold) and Kashmiri(x) -> Stir(reinhold, vivia))\nforall x (Lend(x, reinhold) and Kashmiri(x) -> Shamanise(x, reinhold))\nforall x (Lend(x, vivia) and Stir(vivia, reinhold) -> Shamanise(vivia, reinhold))\nShamanise(vivia, loralie) -> Exoergic(loralie)\nforall x (Lend(x, vivia) and Stir(x, reinhold) -> Shamanise(reinhold, vivia))\nforall x (Shamanise(x, reinhold) and Shamanise(x, loralie) -> not Calceolate(reinhold))\n\nShamanise(vivia, reinhold)\n\nShamanise(vivia, loralie) and forall x (Shamanise(x, loralie) -> Stir(x, reinhold)) -> therefore Stir(vivia, reinhold) Lend(reinhold, vivia) and Stir(vivia, reinhold) and forall x (Lend(x, vivia) and Stir(vivia, reinhold) -> Shamanise(vivia, reinhold)) -> therefore Shamanise(vivia, reinhold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The violet does not chase the toinette. The violet is fifteen. The violet is hegelian. The violet accept the toinette. The violet accept the vinny. The violet ovulate the vinny. The toinette quash the violet. The toinette is decayed. The toinette does not like the violet. The vinny is aeriform. The vinny is fifteen. The vinny is branching. The vinny accept the violet. The vinny accept the toinette. The vinny ovulate the violet. The vinny ovulate the toinette. If someone quash the violet then they see the vinny. If someone quash the vinny and the vinny accept the violet then the violet does not see the toinette. If someone accept the vinny and they are decayed then the vinny ovulate the toinette. If someone accept the vinny and they are decayed then they chase the vinny. If someone accept the toinette and the toinette ovulate the vinny then the toinette quash the vinny. If the toinette quash the violet then the violet is fifteen. If someone accept the toinette and they see the vinny then the vinny quash the toinette. If someone quash the vinny and they chase the violet then the vinny is not hegelian. The toinette does not chase the vinny.", "logic": "\nnot Quash(violet, toinette)\nFifteen(violet)\nHegelian(violet)\nAccept(violet, toinette)\nAccept(violet, vinny)\nOvulate(violet, vinny)\nQuash(toinette, violet)\nDecayed(toinette)\nnot Accept(toinette, violet)\nAeriform(vinny)\nFifteen(vinny)\nBranching(vinny)\nAccept(vinny, violet)\nAccept(vinny, toinette)\nOvulate(vinny, violet)\nOvulate(vinny, toinette)\nforall x (Quash(x, violet) -> Ovulate(x, vinny))\nforall x (Quash(x, vinny) and Accept(vinny, violet) -> not Ovulate(violet, toinette))\nforall x (Accept(x, vinny) and Decayed(x) -> Ovulate(vinny, toinette))\nforall x (Accept(x, vinny) and Decayed(x) -> Quash(x, vinny))\nforall x (Accept(x, toinette) and Ovulate(toinette, vinny) -> Quash(toinette, vinny))\nQuash(toinette, violet) -> Fifteen(violet)\nforall x (Accept(x, toinette) and Ovulate(x, vinny) -> Quash(vinny, toinette))\nforall x (Quash(x, vinny) and Quash(x, violet) -> not Hegelian(vinny))\n\nnot Quash(toinette, vinny)\n\nQuash(toinette, violet) and forall x (Quash(x, violet) -> Ovulate(x, vinny)) -> therefore Ovulate(toinette, vinny) Accept(vinny, toinette) and Ovulate(toinette, vinny) and forall x (Accept(x, toinette) and Ovulate(toinette, vinny) -> Quash(toinette, vinny)) -> therefore Quash(toinette, vinny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The bonnee does not chase the robinet. The bonnee is bromidic. The bonnee is neurotic. The bonnee tittivate the robinet. The bonnee tittivate the wendall. The bonnee burke the wendall. The robinet abscond the bonnee. The robinet is closed. The robinet does not like the bonnee. The wendall is ginger. The wendall is bromidic. The wendall is foster. The wendall tittivate the bonnee. The wendall tittivate the robinet. The wendall burke the bonnee. The wendall burke the robinet. If someone abscond the bonnee then they see the wendall. If someone abscond the wendall and the wendall tittivate the bonnee then the bonnee does not see the robinet. If someone tittivate the wendall and they are closed then the wendall burke the robinet. If someone tittivate the wendall and they are closed then they chase the wendall. If someone tittivate the robinet and the robinet burke the wendall then the robinet abscond the wendall. If the robinet abscond the bonnee then the bonnee is bromidic. If someone tittivate the robinet and they see the wendall then the wendall abscond the robinet. If someone abscond the wendall and they chase the bonnee then the wendall is not neurotic. The bonnee does not see the robinet.", "logic": "\nnot Abscond(bonnee, robinet)\nBromidic(bonnee)\nNeurotic(bonnee)\nTittivate(bonnee, robinet)\nTittivate(bonnee, wendall)\nBurke(bonnee, wendall)\nAbscond(robinet, bonnee)\nClosed(robinet)\nnot Tittivate(robinet, bonnee)\nGinger(wendall)\nBromidic(wendall)\nFoster(wendall)\nTittivate(wendall, bonnee)\nTittivate(wendall, robinet)\nBurke(wendall, bonnee)\nBurke(wendall, robinet)\nforall x (Abscond(x, bonnee) -> Burke(x, wendall))\nforall x (Abscond(x, wendall) and Tittivate(wendall, bonnee) -> not Burke(bonnee, robinet))\nforall x (Tittivate(x, wendall) and Closed(x) -> Burke(wendall, robinet))\nforall x (Tittivate(x, wendall) and Closed(x) -> Abscond(x, wendall))\nforall x (Tittivate(x, robinet) and Burke(robinet, wendall) -> Abscond(robinet, wendall))\nAbscond(robinet, bonnee) -> Bromidic(bonnee)\nforall x (Tittivate(x, robinet) and Burke(x, wendall) -> Abscond(wendall, robinet))\nforall x (Abscond(x, wendall) and Abscond(x, bonnee) -> not Neurotic(wendall))\n\nnot Burke(bonnee, robinet)\n\nAbscond(robinet, bonnee) and forall x (Abscond(x, bonnee) -> Burke(x, wendall)) -> therefore Burke(robinet, wendall) Tittivate(wendall, robinet) and Burke(robinet, wendall) and forall x (Tittivate(x, robinet) and Burke(robinet, wendall) -> Abscond(robinet, wendall)) -> therefore Abscond(robinet, wendall) Abscond(robinet, wendall) and Tittivate(wendall, bonnee) and forall x (Abscond(x, wendall) and Tittivate(wendall, bonnee) -> not Burke(bonnee, robinet)) -> therefore not Burke(bonnee, robinet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The tait does not chase the brigit. The tait is whorled. The tait is hempen. The tait ulcerate the brigit. The tait ulcerate the bella. The tait humour the bella. The brigit reschedule the tait. The brigit is beechen. The brigit does not like the tait. The bella is tender. The bella is whorled. The bella is undreamt. The bella ulcerate the tait. The bella ulcerate the brigit. The bella humour the tait. The bella humour the brigit. If someone reschedule the tait then they see the bella. If someone reschedule the bella and the bella ulcerate the tait then the tait does not see the brigit. If someone ulcerate the bella and they are beechen then the bella humour the brigit. If someone ulcerate the bella and they are beechen then they chase the bella. If someone ulcerate the brigit and the brigit humour the bella then the brigit reschedule the bella. If the brigit reschedule the tait then the tait is whorled. If someone ulcerate the brigit and they see the bella then the bella reschedule the brigit. If someone reschedule the bella and they chase the tait then the bella is not hempen. The bella is hempen.", "logic": "\nnot Reschedule(tait, brigit)\nWhorled(tait)\nHempen(tait)\nUlcerate(tait, brigit)\nUlcerate(tait, bella)\nHumour(tait, bella)\nReschedule(brigit, tait)\nBeechen(brigit)\nnot Ulcerate(brigit, tait)\nTender(bella)\nWhorled(bella)\nUndreamt(bella)\nUlcerate(bella, tait)\nUlcerate(bella, brigit)\nHumour(bella, tait)\nHumour(bella, brigit)\nforall x (Reschedule(x, tait) -> Humour(x, bella))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, bella) and Ulcerate(bella, tait) -> not Humour(tait, brigit))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, bella) and Beechen(x) -> Humour(bella, brigit))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, bella) and Beechen(x) -> Reschedule(x, bella))\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, brigit) and Humour(brigit, bella) -> Reschedule(brigit, bella))\nReschedule(brigit, tait) -> Whorled(tait)\nforall x (Ulcerate(x, brigit) and Humour(x, bella) -> Reschedule(bella, brigit))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, bella) and Reschedule(x, tait) -> not Hempen(bella))\n\nHempen(bella)\n\nReschedule(brigit, tait) and forall x (Reschedule(x, tait) -> Humour(x, bella)) -> therefore Humour(brigit, bella) Ulcerate(bella, brigit) and Humour(brigit, bella) and forall x (Ulcerate(x, brigit) and Humour(brigit, bella) -> Reschedule(brigit, bella)) -> therefore Reschedule(brigit, bella) Reschedule(brigit, bella) and Reschedule(brigit, tait) and forall x (Reschedule(x, bella) and Reschedule(x, tait) -> not Hempen(bella)) -> therefore not Hempen(bella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The dexter does not chase the barth. The dexter is sporty. The dexter is allusive. The dexter sober the barth. The dexter sober the tabby. The dexter bayonet the tabby. The barth misconduct the dexter. The barth is perturbed. The barth does not like the dexter. The tabby is boskopoid. The tabby is sporty. The tabby is ukrainian. The tabby sober the dexter. The tabby sober the barth. The tabby bayonet the dexter. The tabby bayonet the barth. If someone misconduct the dexter then they see the tabby. If someone misconduct the tabby and the tabby sober the dexter then the dexter does not see the barth. If someone sober the tabby and they are perturbed then the tabby bayonet the barth. If someone sober the tabby and they are perturbed then they chase the tabby. If someone sober the barth and the barth bayonet the tabby then the barth misconduct the tabby. If the barth misconduct the dexter then the dexter is sporty. If someone sober the barth and they see the tabby then the tabby misconduct the barth. If someone misconduct the tabby and they chase the dexter then the tabby is not allusive. The dexter does not chase the tabby.", "logic": "\nnot Misconduct(dexter, barth)\nSporty(dexter)\nAllusive(dexter)\nSober(dexter, barth)\nSober(dexter, tabby)\nBayonet(dexter, tabby)\nMisconduct(barth, dexter)\nPerturbed(barth)\nnot Sober(barth, dexter)\nBoskopoid(tabby)\nSporty(tabby)\nUkrainian(tabby)\nSober(tabby, dexter)\nSober(tabby, barth)\nBayonet(tabby, dexter)\nBayonet(tabby, barth)\nforall x (Misconduct(x, dexter) -> Bayonet(x, tabby))\nforall x (Misconduct(x, tabby) and Sober(tabby, dexter) -> not Bayonet(dexter, barth))\nforall x (Sober(x, tabby) and Perturbed(x) -> Bayonet(tabby, barth))\nforall x (Sober(x, tabby) and Perturbed(x) -> Misconduct(x, tabby))\nforall x (Sober(x, barth) and Bayonet(barth, tabby) -> Misconduct(barth, tabby))\nMisconduct(barth, dexter) -> Sporty(dexter)\nforall x (Sober(x, barth) and Bayonet(x, tabby) -> Misconduct(tabby, barth))\nforall x (Misconduct(x, tabby) and Misconduct(x, dexter) -> not Allusive(tabby))\n\nnot Misconduct(dexter, tabby)\n\nforall x (Sober(x, tabby) and Perturbed(x) -> Misconduct(x, tabby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The nicolea does not chase the karla. The nicolea is mendicant. The nicolea is boreal. The nicolea swathe the karla. The nicolea swathe the allene. The nicolea distill the allene. The karla gauffer the nicolea. The karla is amebous. The karla does not like the nicolea. The allene is wellborn. The allene is mendicant. The allene is whacking. The allene swathe the nicolea. The allene swathe the karla. The allene distill the nicolea. The allene distill the karla. If someone gauffer the nicolea then they see the allene. If someone gauffer the allene and the allene swathe the nicolea then the nicolea does not see the karla. If someone swathe the allene and they are amebous then the allene distill the karla. If someone swathe the allene and they are amebous then they chase the allene. If someone swathe the karla and the karla distill the allene then the karla gauffer the allene. If the karla gauffer the nicolea then the nicolea is mendicant. If someone swathe the karla and they see the allene then the allene gauffer the karla. If someone gauffer the allene and they chase the nicolea then the allene is not boreal. The allene distill the allene.", "logic": "\nnot Gauffer(nicolea, karla)\nMendicant(nicolea)\nBoreal(nicolea)\nSwathe(nicolea, karla)\nSwathe(nicolea, allene)\nDistill(nicolea, allene)\nGauffer(karla, nicolea)\nAmebous(karla)\nnot Swathe(karla, nicolea)\nWellborn(allene)\nMendicant(allene)\nWhacking(allene)\nSwathe(allene, nicolea)\nSwathe(allene, karla)\nDistill(allene, nicolea)\nDistill(allene, karla)\nforall x (Gauffer(x, nicolea) -> Distill(x, allene))\nforall x (Gauffer(x, allene) and Swathe(allene, nicolea) -> not Distill(nicolea, karla))\nforall x (Swathe(x, allene) and Amebous(x) -> Distill(allene, karla))\nforall x (Swathe(x, allene) and Amebous(x) -> Gauffer(x, allene))\nforall x (Swathe(x, karla) and Distill(karla, allene) -> Gauffer(karla, allene))\nGauffer(karla, nicolea) -> Mendicant(nicolea)\nforall x (Swathe(x, karla) and Distill(x, allene) -> Gauffer(allene, karla))\nforall x (Gauffer(x, allene) and Gauffer(x, nicolea) -> not Boreal(allene))\n\nDistill(allene, allene)\n\nforall x (Gauffer(x, nicolea) -> Distill(x, allene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The jerri does not chase the verne. The jerri is notable. The jerri is gaussian. The jerri glimpse the verne. The jerri glimpse the derek. The jerri pour the derek. The verne stutter the jerri. The verne is wrinkled. The verne does not like the jerri. The derek is proved. The derek is notable. The derek is romansh. The derek glimpse the jerri. The derek glimpse the verne. The derek pour the jerri. The derek pour the verne. If someone stutter the jerri then they see the derek. If someone stutter the derek and the derek glimpse the jerri then the jerri does not see the verne. If someone glimpse the derek and they are wrinkled then the derek pour the verne. If someone glimpse the derek and they are wrinkled then they chase the derek. If someone glimpse the verne and the verne pour the derek then the verne stutter the derek. If the verne stutter the jerri then the jerri is notable. If someone glimpse the verne and they see the derek then the derek stutter the verne. If someone stutter the derek and they chase the jerri then the derek is not gaussian. The derek does not chase the derek.", "logic": "\nnot Stutter(jerri, verne)\nNotable(jerri)\nGaussian(jerri)\nGlimpse(jerri, verne)\nGlimpse(jerri, derek)\nPour(jerri, derek)\nStutter(verne, jerri)\nWrinkled(verne)\nnot Glimpse(verne, jerri)\nProved(derek)\nNotable(derek)\nRomansh(derek)\nGlimpse(derek, jerri)\nGlimpse(derek, verne)\nPour(derek, jerri)\nPour(derek, verne)\nforall x (Stutter(x, jerri) -> Pour(x, derek))\nforall x (Stutter(x, derek) and Glimpse(derek, jerri) -> not Pour(jerri, verne))\nforall x (Glimpse(x, derek) and Wrinkled(x) -> Pour(derek, verne))\nforall x (Glimpse(x, derek) and Wrinkled(x) -> Stutter(x, derek))\nforall x (Glimpse(x, verne) and Pour(verne, derek) -> Stutter(verne, derek))\nStutter(verne, jerri) -> Notable(jerri)\nforall x (Glimpse(x, verne) and Pour(x, derek) -> Stutter(derek, verne))\nforall x (Stutter(x, derek) and Stutter(x, jerri) -> not Gaussian(derek))\n\nnot Stutter(derek, derek)\n\nforall x (Glimpse(x, derek) and Wrinkled(x) -> Stutter(x, derek)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The baldwin does not chase the anya. The baldwin is ingrained. The baldwin is philistine. The baldwin despatch the anya. The baldwin despatch the wallace. The baldwin inflict the wallace. The anya flour the baldwin. The anya is rightful. The anya does not like the baldwin. The wallace is amalgamate. The wallace is ingrained. The wallace is posed. The wallace despatch the baldwin. The wallace despatch the anya. The wallace inflict the baldwin. The wallace inflict the anya. If someone flour the baldwin then they see the wallace. If someone flour the wallace and the wallace despatch the baldwin then the baldwin does not see the anya. If someone despatch the wallace and they are rightful then the wallace inflict the anya. If someone despatch the wallace and they are rightful then they chase the wallace. If someone despatch the anya and the anya inflict the wallace then the anya flour the wallace. If the anya flour the baldwin then the baldwin is ingrained. If someone despatch the anya and they see the wallace then the wallace flour the anya. If someone flour the wallace and they chase the baldwin then the wallace is not philistine. The baldwin inflict the baldwin.", "logic": "\nnot Flour(baldwin, anya)\nIngrained(baldwin)\nPhilistine(baldwin)\nDespatch(baldwin, anya)\nDespatch(baldwin, wallace)\nInflict(baldwin, wallace)\nFlour(anya, baldwin)\nRightful(anya)\nnot Despatch(anya, baldwin)\nAmalgamate(wallace)\nIngrained(wallace)\nPosed(wallace)\nDespatch(wallace, baldwin)\nDespatch(wallace, anya)\nInflict(wallace, baldwin)\nInflict(wallace, anya)\nforall x (Flour(x, baldwin) -> Inflict(x, wallace))\nforall x (Flour(x, wallace) and Despatch(wallace, baldwin) -> not Inflict(baldwin, anya))\nforall x (Despatch(x, wallace) and Rightful(x) -> Inflict(wallace, anya))\nforall x (Despatch(x, wallace) and Rightful(x) -> Flour(x, wallace))\nforall x (Despatch(x, anya) and Inflict(anya, wallace) -> Flour(anya, wallace))\nFlour(anya, baldwin) -> Ingrained(baldwin)\nforall x (Despatch(x, anya) and Inflict(x, wallace) -> Flour(wallace, anya))\nforall x (Flour(x, wallace) and Flour(x, baldwin) -> not Philistine(wallace))\n\nInflict(baldwin, baldwin)\n\nInflict(baldwin, baldwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The bessie does not chase the oran. The bessie is blithe. The bessie is clear. The bessie moot the oran. The bessie moot the barnard. The bessie overhaul the barnard. The oran confab the bessie. The oran is monosemous. The oran does not like the bessie. The barnard is batwing. The barnard is blithe. The barnard is cashable. The barnard moot the bessie. The barnard moot the oran. The barnard overhaul the bessie. The barnard overhaul the oran. If someone confab the bessie then they see the barnard. If someone confab the barnard and the barnard moot the bessie then the bessie does not see the oran. If someone moot the barnard and they are monosemous then the barnard overhaul the oran. If someone moot the barnard and they are monosemous then they chase the barnard. If someone moot the oran and the oran overhaul the barnard then the oran confab the barnard. If the oran confab the bessie then the bessie is blithe. If someone moot the oran and they see the barnard then the barnard confab the oran. If someone confab the barnard and they chase the bessie then the barnard is not clear. The barnard does not chase the bessie.", "logic": "\nnot Confab(bessie, oran)\nBlithe(bessie)\nClear(bessie)\nMoot(bessie, oran)\nMoot(bessie, barnard)\nOverhaul(bessie, barnard)\nConfab(oran, bessie)\nMonosemous(oran)\nnot Moot(oran, bessie)\nBatwing(barnard)\nBlithe(barnard)\nCashable(barnard)\nMoot(barnard, bessie)\nMoot(barnard, oran)\nOverhaul(barnard, bessie)\nOverhaul(barnard, oran)\nforall x (Confab(x, bessie) -> Overhaul(x, barnard))\nforall x (Confab(x, barnard) and Moot(barnard, bessie) -> not Overhaul(bessie, oran))\nforall x (Moot(x, barnard) and Monosemous(x) -> Overhaul(barnard, oran))\nforall x (Moot(x, barnard) and Monosemous(x) -> Confab(x, barnard))\nforall x (Moot(x, oran) and Overhaul(oran, barnard) -> Confab(oran, barnard))\nConfab(oran, bessie) -> Blithe(bessie)\nforall x (Moot(x, oran) and Overhaul(x, barnard) -> Confab(barnard, oran))\nforall x (Confab(x, barnard) and Confab(x, bessie) -> not Clear(barnard))\n\nnot Confab(barnard, bessie)\n\nnot Confab(barnard, bessie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The erminia does not chase the elsy. The erminia is flemish. The erminia is humbled. The erminia snake the elsy. The erminia snake the alexia. The erminia decamp the alexia. The elsy derestrict the erminia. The elsy is shapely. The elsy does not like the erminia. The alexia is subduable. The alexia is flemish. The alexia is unlaced. The alexia snake the erminia. The alexia snake the elsy. The alexia decamp the erminia. The alexia decamp the elsy. If someone derestrict the erminia then they see the alexia. If someone derestrict the alexia and the alexia snake the erminia then the erminia does not see the elsy. If someone snake the alexia and they are shapely then the alexia decamp the elsy. If someone snake the alexia and they are shapely then they chase the alexia. If someone snake the elsy and the elsy decamp the alexia then the elsy derestrict the alexia. If the elsy derestrict the erminia then the erminia is flemish. If someone snake the elsy and they see the alexia then the alexia derestrict the elsy. If someone derestrict the alexia and they chase the erminia then the alexia is not humbled. The erminia is unlaced.", "logic": "\nnot Derestrict(erminia, elsy)\nFlemish(erminia)\nHumbled(erminia)\nSnake(erminia, elsy)\nSnake(erminia, alexia)\nDecamp(erminia, alexia)\nDerestrict(elsy, erminia)\nShapely(elsy)\nnot Snake(elsy, erminia)\nSubduable(alexia)\nFlemish(alexia)\nUnlaced(alexia)\nSnake(alexia, erminia)\nSnake(alexia, elsy)\nDecamp(alexia, erminia)\nDecamp(alexia, elsy)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, erminia) -> Decamp(x, alexia))\nforall x (Derestrict(x, alexia) and Snake(alexia, erminia) -> not Decamp(erminia, elsy))\nforall x (Snake(x, alexia) and Shapely(x) -> Decamp(alexia, elsy))\nforall x (Snake(x, alexia) and Shapely(x) -> Derestrict(x, alexia))\nforall x (Snake(x, elsy) and Decamp(elsy, alexia) -> Derestrict(elsy, alexia))\nDerestrict(elsy, erminia) -> Flemish(erminia)\nforall x (Snake(x, elsy) and Decamp(x, alexia) -> Derestrict(alexia, elsy))\nforall x (Derestrict(x, alexia) and Derestrict(x, erminia) -> not Humbled(alexia))\n\nUnlaced(erminia)\n\nUnlaced(erminia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The erhard does not chase the lorain. The erhard is salivary. The erhard is bifurcate. The erhard basify the lorain. The erhard basify the lamb. The erhard indict the lamb. The lorain adjust the erhard. The lorain is pledged. The lorain does not like the erhard. The lamb is extempore. The lamb is salivary. The lamb is porcine. The lamb basify the erhard. The lamb basify the lorain. The lamb indict the erhard. The lamb indict the lorain. If someone adjust the erhard then they see the lamb. If someone adjust the lamb and the lamb basify the erhard then the erhard does not see the lorain. If someone basify the lamb and they are pledged then the lamb indict the lorain. If someone basify the lamb and they are pledged then they chase the lamb. If someone basify the lorain and the lorain indict the lamb then the lorain adjust the lamb. If the lorain adjust the erhard then the erhard is salivary. If someone basify the lorain and they see the lamb then the lamb adjust the lorain. If someone adjust the lamb and they chase the erhard then the lamb is not bifurcate. The lorain does not like the lorain.", "logic": "\nnot Adjust(erhard, lorain)\nSalivary(erhard)\nBifurcate(erhard)\nBasify(erhard, lorain)\nBasify(erhard, lamb)\nIndict(erhard, lamb)\nAdjust(lorain, erhard)\nPledged(lorain)\nnot Basify(lorain, erhard)\nExtempore(lamb)\nSalivary(lamb)\nPorcine(lamb)\nBasify(lamb, erhard)\nBasify(lamb, lorain)\nIndict(lamb, erhard)\nIndict(lamb, lorain)\nforall x (Adjust(x, erhard) -> Indict(x, lamb))\nforall x (Adjust(x, lamb) and Basify(lamb, erhard) -> not Indict(erhard, lorain))\nforall x (Basify(x, lamb) and Pledged(x) -> Indict(lamb, lorain))\nforall x (Basify(x, lamb) and Pledged(x) -> Adjust(x, lamb))\nforall x (Basify(x, lorain) and Indict(lorain, lamb) -> Adjust(lorain, lamb))\nAdjust(lorain, erhard) -> Salivary(erhard)\nforall x (Basify(x, lorain) and Indict(x, lamb) -> Adjust(lamb, lorain))\nforall x (Adjust(x, lamb) and Adjust(x, erhard) -> not Bifurcate(lamb))\n\nnot Basify(lorain, lorain)\n\nnot Basify(lorain, lorain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The rhodie does not chase the marco. The rhodie is seraphical. The rhodie is dilute. The rhodie connect the marco. The rhodie connect the jilly. The rhodie hurdle the jilly. The marco stride the rhodie. The marco is doped. The marco does not like the rhodie. The jilly is digressive. The jilly is seraphical. The jilly is boney. The jilly connect the rhodie. The jilly connect the marco. The jilly hurdle the rhodie. The jilly hurdle the marco. If someone stride the rhodie then they see the jilly. If someone stride the jilly and the jilly connect the rhodie then the rhodie does not see the marco. If someone connect the jilly and they are doped then the jilly hurdle the marco. If someone connect the jilly and they are doped then they chase the jilly. If someone connect the marco and the marco hurdle the jilly then the marco stride the jilly. If the marco stride the rhodie then the rhodie is seraphical. If someone connect the marco and they see the jilly then the jilly stride the marco. If someone stride the jilly and they chase the rhodie then the jilly is not dilute. The rhodie connect the rhodie.", "logic": "\nnot Stride(rhodie, marco)\nSeraphical(rhodie)\nDilute(rhodie)\nConnect(rhodie, marco)\nConnect(rhodie, jilly)\nHurdle(rhodie, jilly)\nStride(marco, rhodie)\nDoped(marco)\nnot Connect(marco, rhodie)\nDigressive(jilly)\nSeraphical(jilly)\nBoney(jilly)\nConnect(jilly, rhodie)\nConnect(jilly, marco)\nHurdle(jilly, rhodie)\nHurdle(jilly, marco)\nforall x (Stride(x, rhodie) -> Hurdle(x, jilly))\nforall x (Stride(x, jilly) and Connect(jilly, rhodie) -> not Hurdle(rhodie, marco))\nforall x (Connect(x, jilly) and Doped(x) -> Hurdle(jilly, marco))\nforall x (Connect(x, jilly) and Doped(x) -> Stride(x, jilly))\nforall x (Connect(x, marco) and Hurdle(marco, jilly) -> Stride(marco, jilly))\nStride(marco, rhodie) -> Seraphical(rhodie)\nforall x (Connect(x, marco) and Hurdle(x, jilly) -> Stride(jilly, marco))\nforall x (Stride(x, jilly) and Stride(x, rhodie) -> not Dilute(jilly))\n\nConnect(rhodie, rhodie)\n\nConnect(rhodie, rhodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "Lebbie is revealing. Seana is unnoticed. Sherie is unnoticed. If someone is autarchic then they are polyatomic. If someone is revealing then they are polyatomic. If Sherie is monoclinic then Sherie is not autarchic. All aphyllous people are monoclinic. If someone is unnoticed then they are autarchic. If someone is aphyllous and monoclinic then they are autarchic. Smart people are sapphic. If someone is autarchic and not monoclinic then they are sapphic. Lebbie is revealing.", "logic": "\nRevealing(lebbie)\nUnnoticed(seana)\nUnnoticed(sherie)\nforall x (Autarchic(x) -> Polyatomic(x))\nforall x (Revealing(x) -> Polyatomic(x))\nMonoclinic(sherie) -> not Autarchic(sherie)\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) -> Autarchic(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) and Monoclinic(x) -> Autarchic(x))\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Sapphic(x))\nforall x (Autarchic(x) and not Monoclinic(x) -> Sapphic(x))\n\nRevealing(lebbie)\n\ntherefore Revealing(lebbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Oscar is deceased. Joanie is corded. Natalia is corded. If someone is pukka then they are toadyish. If someone is deceased then they are toadyish. If Natalia is nidicolous then Natalia is not pukka. All practised people are nidicolous. If someone is corded then they are pukka. If someone is practised and nidicolous then they are pukka. Smart people are polyphonic. If someone is pukka and not nidicolous then they are polyphonic. Joanie is not corded.", "logic": "\nDeceased(oscar)\nCorded(joanie)\nCorded(natalia)\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Deceased(x) -> Toadyish(x))\nNidicolous(natalia) -> not Pukka(natalia)\nforall x (Practised(x) -> Nidicolous(x))\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Pukka(x))\nforall x (Practised(x) and Nidicolous(x) -> Pukka(x))\nforall x (Toadyish(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\nforall x (Pukka(x) and not Nidicolous(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\n\nnot Corded(joanie)\n\ntherefore Corded(joanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Jedediah is liable. Clareta is weepy. Tracy is weepy. If someone is aftermost then they are virtuous. If someone is liable then they are virtuous. If Tracy is unentitled then Tracy is not aftermost. All resettled people are unentitled. If someone is weepy then they are aftermost. If someone is resettled and unentitled then they are aftermost. Smart people are disklike. If someone is aftermost and not unentitled then they are disklike. Jedediah is virtuous.", "logic": "\nLiable(jedediah)\nWeepy(clareta)\nWeepy(tracy)\nforall x (Aftermost(x) -> Virtuous(x))\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Virtuous(x))\nUnentitled(tracy) -> not Aftermost(tracy)\nforall x (Resettled(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Aftermost(x))\nforall x (Resettled(x) and Unentitled(x) -> Aftermost(x))\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Disklike(x))\nforall x (Aftermost(x) and not Unentitled(x) -> Disklike(x))\n\nVirtuous(jedediah)\n\nLiable(jedediah) and forall x (Liable(x) -> Virtuous(x)) -> therefore Virtuous(jedediah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Nady is sharp. Marian is piffling. Trisha is piffling. If someone is maternal then they are flaring. If someone is sharp then they are flaring. If Trisha is unveiled then Trisha is not maternal. All ignitable people are unveiled. If someone is piffling then they are maternal. If someone is ignitable and unveiled then they are maternal. Smart people are knavish. If someone is maternal and not unveiled then they are knavish. Nady is not flaring.", "logic": "\nSharp(nady)\nPiffling(marian)\nPiffling(trisha)\nforall x (Maternal(x) -> Flaring(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Flaring(x))\nUnveiled(trisha) -> not Maternal(trisha)\nforall x (Ignitable(x) -> Unveiled(x))\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> Maternal(x))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and Unveiled(x) -> Maternal(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Maternal(x) and not Unveiled(x) -> Knavish(x))\n\nnot Flaring(nady)\n\nSharp(nady) and forall x (Sharp(x) -> Flaring(x)) -> therefore Flaring(nady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Sumner is tautologic. Anastasie is jelled. Hester is jelled. If someone is clitoral then they are fitter. If someone is tautologic then they are fitter. If Hester is abkhaz then Hester is not clitoral. All tanzanian people are abkhaz. If someone is jelled then they are clitoral. If someone is tanzanian and abkhaz then they are clitoral. Smart people are deranged. If someone is clitoral and not abkhaz then they are deranged. Sumner is deranged.", "logic": "\nTautologic(sumner)\nJelled(anastasie)\nJelled(hester)\nforall x (Clitoral(x) -> Fitter(x))\nforall x (Tautologic(x) -> Fitter(x))\nAbkhaz(hester) -> not Clitoral(hester)\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) -> Abkhaz(x))\nforall x (Jelled(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) and Abkhaz(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Fitter(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) and not Abkhaz(x) -> Deranged(x))\n\nDeranged(sumner)\n\nTautologic(sumner) and forall x (Tautologic(x) -> Fitter(x)) -> therefore Fitter(sumner) Fitter(sumner) and forall x (Fitter(x) -> Deranged(x)) -> therefore Deranged(sumner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Harwell is terrene. Conni is winning. Selie is winning. If someone is uneducated then they are epicarpal. If someone is terrene then they are epicarpal. If Selie is deadly then Selie is not uneducated. All slain people are deadly. If someone is winning then they are uneducated. If someone is slain and deadly then they are uneducated. Smart people are fledgeling. If someone is uneducated and not deadly then they are fledgeling. Selie is not epicarpal.", "logic": "\nTerrene(harwell)\nWinning(conni)\nWinning(selie)\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\nDeadly(selie) -> not Uneducated(selie)\nforall x (Slain(x) -> Deadly(x))\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Slain(x) and Deadly(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) -> Fledgeling(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and not Deadly(x) -> Fledgeling(x))\n\nnot Epicarpal(selie)\n\nWinning(selie) and forall x (Winning(x) -> Uneducated(x)) -> therefore Uneducated(selie) Uneducated(selie) and forall x (Uneducated(x) -> Epicarpal(x)) -> therefore Epicarpal(selie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Louis is precedent. Webster is paradisaic. Briney is paradisaic. If someone is surreal then they are leakproof. If someone is precedent then they are leakproof. If Briney is adventive then Briney is not surreal. All andalusian people are adventive. If someone is paradisaic then they are surreal. If someone is andalusian and adventive then they are surreal. Smart people are officious. If someone is surreal and not adventive then they are officious. Briney is officious.", "logic": "\nPrecedent(louis)\nParadisaic(webster)\nParadisaic(briney)\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Leakproof(x))\nforall x (Precedent(x) -> Leakproof(x))\nAdventive(briney) -> not Surreal(briney)\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> Adventive(x))\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) -> Surreal(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Adventive(x) -> Surreal(x))\nforall x (Leakproof(x) -> Officious(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) and not Adventive(x) -> Officious(x))\n\nOfficious(briney)\n\nParadisaic(briney) and forall x (Paradisaic(x) -> Surreal(x)) -> therefore Surreal(briney) Surreal(briney) and forall x (Surreal(x) -> Leakproof(x)) -> therefore Leakproof(briney) Leakproof(briney) and forall x (Leakproof(x) -> Officious(x)) -> therefore Officious(briney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Katalin is squelched. Goldarina is undirected. Kellie is undirected. If someone is millennial then they are fascistic. If someone is squelched then they are fascistic. If Kellie is dustlike then Kellie is not millennial. All amiable people are dustlike. If someone is undirected then they are millennial. If someone is amiable and dustlike then they are millennial. Smart people are capsulated. If someone is millennial and not dustlike then they are capsulated. Goldarina is not capsulated.", "logic": "\nSquelched(katalin)\nUndirected(goldarina)\nUndirected(kellie)\nforall x (Millennial(x) -> Fascistic(x))\nforall x (Squelched(x) -> Fascistic(x))\nDustlike(kellie) -> not Millennial(kellie)\nforall x (Amiable(x) -> Dustlike(x))\nforall x (Undirected(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Amiable(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Fascistic(x) -> Capsulated(x))\nforall x (Millennial(x) and not Dustlike(x) -> Capsulated(x))\n\nnot Capsulated(goldarina)\n\nUndirected(goldarina) and forall x (Undirected(x) -> Millennial(x)) -> therefore Millennial(goldarina) Millennial(goldarina) and forall x (Millennial(x) -> Fascistic(x)) -> therefore Fascistic(goldarina) Fascistic(goldarina) and forall x (Fascistic(x) -> Capsulated(x)) -> therefore Capsulated(goldarina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Wendel is unsounded. Felice is bronchitic. Rubin is bronchitic. If someone is victimized then they are slatey. If someone is unsounded then they are slatey. If Rubin is incorrect then Rubin is not victimized. All freewill people are incorrect. If someone is bronchitic then they are victimized. If someone is freewill and incorrect then they are victimized. Smart people are fossilised. If someone is victimized and not incorrect then they are fossilised. Felice is not incorrect.", "logic": "\nUnsounded(wendel)\nBronchitic(felice)\nBronchitic(rubin)\nforall x (Victimized(x) -> Slatey(x))\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Slatey(x))\nIncorrect(rubin) -> not Victimized(rubin)\nforall x (Freewill(x) -> Incorrect(x))\nforall x (Bronchitic(x) -> Victimized(x))\nforall x (Freewill(x) and Incorrect(x) -> Victimized(x))\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Fossilised(x))\nforall x (Victimized(x) and not Incorrect(x) -> Fossilised(x))\n\nnot Incorrect(felice)\n\nforall x (Freewill(x) -> Incorrect(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Jessika is insatiable. Oona is shitless. Carolee is shitless. If someone is unfrosted then they are succeeding. If someone is insatiable then they are succeeding. If Carolee is colour then Carolee is not unfrosted. All vesicant people are colour. If someone is shitless then they are unfrosted. If someone is vesicant and colour then they are unfrosted. Smart people are bacchanal. If someone is unfrosted and not colour then they are bacchanal. Carolee is colour.", "logic": "\nInsatiable(jessika)\nShitless(oona)\nShitless(carolee)\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Insatiable(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nColour(carolee) -> not Unfrosted(carolee)\nforall x (Vesicant(x) -> Colour(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Vesicant(x) and Colour(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Succeeding(x) -> Bacchanal(x))\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and not Colour(x) -> Bacchanal(x))\n\nColour(carolee)\n\nforall x (Vesicant(x) -> Colour(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Juan is commercial. Shamit is barred. Tabbie is barred. If someone is quits then they are dormie. If someone is commercial then they are dormie. If Tabbie is dyspneic then Tabbie is not quits. All marmorean people are dyspneic. If someone is barred then they are quits. If someone is marmorean and dyspneic then they are quits. Smart people are wounded. If someone is quits and not dyspneic then they are wounded. Juan is not dyspneic.", "logic": "\nCommercial(juan)\nBarred(shamit)\nBarred(tabbie)\nforall x (Quits(x) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Commercial(x) -> Dormie(x))\nDyspneic(tabbie) -> not Quits(tabbie)\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nforall x (Barred(x) -> Quits(x))\nforall x (Marmorean(x) and Dyspneic(x) -> Quits(x))\nforall x (Dormie(x) -> Wounded(x))\nforall x (Quits(x) and not Dyspneic(x) -> Wounded(x))\n\nnot Dyspneic(juan)\n\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Dyspneic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Cinda is masterless. Mariya is ethiopian. Trip is ethiopian. If someone is gangling then they are practiced. If someone is masterless then they are practiced. If Trip is salt then Trip is not gangling. All autoerotic people are salt. If someone is ethiopian then they are gangling. If someone is autoerotic and salt then they are gangling. Smart people are metaphoric. If someone is gangling and not salt then they are metaphoric. Cinda is gangling.", "logic": "\nMasterless(cinda)\nEthiopian(mariya)\nEthiopian(trip)\nforall x (Gangling(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) -> Practiced(x))\nSalt(trip) -> not Gangling(trip)\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Salt(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Gangling(x))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) and Salt(x) -> Gangling(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\nforall x (Gangling(x) and not Salt(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\n\nGangling(cinda)\n\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Gangling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Leonanie is trifoliate. Vivien is semiweekly. Barry is semiweekly. If someone is acarpelous then they are groping. If someone is trifoliate then they are groping. If Barry is spacious then Barry is not acarpelous. All gratifying people are spacious. If someone is semiweekly then they are acarpelous. If someone is gratifying and spacious then they are acarpelous. Smart people are unblushing. If someone is acarpelous and not spacious then they are unblushing. Barry is not trifoliate.", "logic": "\nTrifoliate(leonanie)\nSemiweekly(vivien)\nSemiweekly(barry)\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Groping(x))\nforall x (Trifoliate(x) -> Groping(x))\nSpacious(barry) -> not Acarpelous(barry)\nforall x (Gratifying(x) -> Spacious(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Gratifying(x) and Spacious(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Groping(x) -> Unblushing(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and not Spacious(x) -> Unblushing(x))\n\nnot Trifoliate(barry)\n\nnot Trifoliate(barry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Jean is livid. Mike is uncropped. Jocelyne is uncropped. If someone is sent then they are taxpaying. If someone is livid then they are taxpaying. If Jocelyne is humbled then Jocelyne is not sent. All furtive people are humbled. If someone is uncropped then they are sent. If someone is furtive and humbled then they are sent. Smart people are sandalled. If someone is sent and not humbled then they are sandalled. Jean is uncropped.", "logic": "\nLivid(jean)\nUncropped(mike)\nUncropped(jocelyne)\nforall x (Sent(x) -> Taxpaying(x))\nforall x (Livid(x) -> Taxpaying(x))\nHumbled(jocelyne) -> not Sent(jocelyne)\nforall x (Furtive(x) -> Humbled(x))\nforall x (Uncropped(x) -> Sent(x))\nforall x (Furtive(x) and Humbled(x) -> Sent(x))\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Sandalled(x))\nforall x (Sent(x) and not Humbled(x) -> Sandalled(x))\n\nUncropped(jean)\n\nUncropped(jean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Merill is covert. Nils is jowly. Teodor is jowly. If someone is bantering then they are adoptable. If someone is covert then they are adoptable. If Teodor is sylphlike then Teodor is not bantering. All heard people are sylphlike. If someone is jowly then they are bantering. If someone is heard and sylphlike then they are bantering. Smart people are unmade. If someone is bantering and not sylphlike then they are unmade. Teodor is not heard.", "logic": "\nCovert(merill)\nJowly(nils)\nJowly(teodor)\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Covert(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nSylphlike(teodor) -> not Bantering(teodor)\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Sylphlike(x))\nforall x (Jowly(x) -> Bantering(x))\nforall x (Heard(x) and Sylphlike(x) -> Bantering(x))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Unmade(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) and not Sylphlike(x) -> Unmade(x))\n\nnot Heard(teodor)\n\nnot Heard(teodor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Elladine is platyrhine. Hartley is agamic. Marigold is agamic. If someone is handy then they are unformed. If someone is platyrhine then they are unformed. If Marigold is mantled then Marigold is not handy. All uncharted people are mantled. If someone is agamic then they are handy. If someone is uncharted and mantled then they are handy. Smart people are christian. If someone is handy and not mantled then they are christian. Hartley is uncharted.", "logic": "\nPlatyrhine(elladine)\nAgamic(hartley)\nAgamic(marigold)\nforall x (Handy(x) -> Unformed(x))\nforall x (Platyrhine(x) -> Unformed(x))\nMantled(marigold) -> not Handy(marigold)\nforall x (Uncharted(x) -> Mantled(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Handy(x))\nforall x (Uncharted(x) and Mantled(x) -> Handy(x))\nforall x (Unformed(x) -> Christian(x))\nforall x (Handy(x) and not Mantled(x) -> Christian(x))\n\nUncharted(hartley)\n\nUncharted(hartley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "The tansy watercolor the milzie. The tansy watercolor the carmel. The tansy frivol the carmel. The milzie is nidifugous. The carmel is suppliant. The carmel is nidifugous. The carmel inscribe the tansy. If someone is beetle then they need the milzie. If someone inscribe the carmel then they need the tansy. If someone watercolor the carmel then the carmel watercolor the tansy. If someone is suppliant and they chase the tansy then the tansy inscribe the carmel. If someone is definite and they see the tansy then the tansy inscribe the carmel. If the tansy is not definite then the tansy frivol the milzie. The carmel is nidifugous.", "logic": "\nWatercolor(tansy, milzie)\nWatercolor(tansy, carmel)\nFrivol(tansy, carmel)\nNidifugous(milzie)\nSuppliant(carmel)\nNidifugous(carmel)\nInscribe(carmel, tansy)\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Inscribe(x, milzie))\nforall x (Inscribe(x, carmel) -> Inscribe(x, tansy))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, carmel) -> Watercolor(carmel, tansy))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) and Watercolor(x, tansy) -> Inscribe(tansy, carmel))\nforall x (Definite(x) and Frivol(x, tansy) -> Inscribe(tansy, carmel))\nnot Definite(tansy) -> Frivol(tansy, milzie)\n\nNidifugous(carmel)\n\ntherefore Nidifugous(carmel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The nicol conserve the june. The nicol conserve the frayda. The nicol aerify the frayda. The june is madcap. The frayda is gleaming. The frayda is madcap. The frayda subluxate the nicol. If someone is cuboidal then they need the june. If someone subluxate the frayda then they need the nicol. If someone conserve the frayda then the frayda conserve the nicol. If someone is gleaming and they chase the nicol then the nicol subluxate the frayda. If someone is smoky and they see the nicol then the nicol subluxate the frayda. If the nicol is not smoky then the nicol aerify the june. The nicol does not see the frayda.", "logic": "\nConserve(nicol, june)\nConserve(nicol, frayda)\nAerify(nicol, frayda)\nMadcap(june)\nGleaming(frayda)\nMadcap(frayda)\nSubluxate(frayda, nicol)\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) -> Subluxate(x, june))\nforall x (Subluxate(x, frayda) -> Subluxate(x, nicol))\nforall x (Conserve(x, frayda) -> Conserve(frayda, nicol))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Conserve(x, nicol) -> Subluxate(nicol, frayda))\nforall x (Smoky(x) and Aerify(x, nicol) -> Subluxate(nicol, frayda))\nnot Smoky(nicol) -> Aerify(nicol, june)\n\nnot Aerify(nicol, frayda)\n\ntherefore Aerify(nicol, frayda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The sanford term the catharine. The sanford term the francine. The sanford bedazzle the francine. The catharine is cancerous. The francine is aggressive. The francine is cancerous. The francine snog the sanford. If someone is multiphase then they need the catharine. If someone snog the francine then they need the sanford. If someone term the francine then the francine term the sanford. If someone is aggressive and they chase the sanford then the sanford snog the francine. If someone is classy and they see the sanford then the sanford snog the francine. If the sanford is not classy then the sanford bedazzle the catharine. The francine term the sanford.", "logic": "\nTerm(sanford, catharine)\nTerm(sanford, francine)\nBedazzle(sanford, francine)\nCancerous(catharine)\nAggressive(francine)\nCancerous(francine)\nSnog(francine, sanford)\nforall x (Multiphase(x) -> Snog(x, catharine))\nforall x (Snog(x, francine) -> Snog(x, sanford))\nforall x (Term(x, francine) -> Term(francine, sanford))\nforall x (Aggressive(x) and Term(x, sanford) -> Snog(sanford, francine))\nforall x (Classy(x) and Bedazzle(x, sanford) -> Snog(sanford, francine))\nnot Classy(sanford) -> Bedazzle(sanford, catharine)\n\nTerm(francine, sanford)\n\nTerm(sanford, francine) and forall x (Term(x, francine) -> Term(francine, sanford)) -> therefore Term(francine, sanford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The maxwell enamel the kerstin. The maxwell enamel the inesita. The maxwell revoke the inesita. The kerstin is twoscore. The inesita is sweltry. The inesita is twoscore. The inesita prologize the maxwell. If someone is unparallel then they need the kerstin. If someone prologize the inesita then they need the maxwell. If someone enamel the inesita then the inesita enamel the maxwell. If someone is sweltry and they chase the maxwell then the maxwell prologize the inesita. If someone is sixteenth and they see the maxwell then the maxwell prologize the inesita. If the maxwell is not sixteenth then the maxwell revoke the kerstin. The inesita does not chase the maxwell.", "logic": "\nEnamel(maxwell, kerstin)\nEnamel(maxwell, inesita)\nRevoke(maxwell, inesita)\nTwoscore(kerstin)\nSweltry(inesita)\nTwoscore(inesita)\nPrologize(inesita, maxwell)\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Prologize(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Prologize(x, inesita) -> Prologize(x, maxwell))\nforall x (Enamel(x, inesita) -> Enamel(inesita, maxwell))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Enamel(x, maxwell) -> Prologize(maxwell, inesita))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) and Revoke(x, maxwell) -> Prologize(maxwell, inesita))\nnot Sixteenth(maxwell) -> Revoke(maxwell, kerstin)\n\nnot Enamel(inesita, maxwell)\n\nEnamel(maxwell, inesita) and forall x (Enamel(x, inesita) -> Enamel(inesita, maxwell)) -> therefore Enamel(inesita, maxwell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The phyllis skirmish the bryana. The phyllis skirmish the clare. The phyllis avulse the clare. The bryana is metastable. The clare is ominous. The clare is metastable. The clare catalogue the phyllis. If someone is gaunt then they need the bryana. If someone catalogue the clare then they need the phyllis. If someone skirmish the clare then the clare skirmish the phyllis. If someone is ominous and they chase the phyllis then the phyllis catalogue the clare. If someone is protecting and they see the phyllis then the phyllis catalogue the clare. If the phyllis is not protecting then the phyllis avulse the bryana. The phyllis catalogue the clare.", "logic": "\nSkirmish(phyllis, bryana)\nSkirmish(phyllis, clare)\nAvulse(phyllis, clare)\nMetastable(bryana)\nOminous(clare)\nMetastable(clare)\nCatalogue(clare, phyllis)\nforall x (Gaunt(x) -> Catalogue(x, bryana))\nforall x (Catalogue(x, clare) -> Catalogue(x, phyllis))\nforall x (Skirmish(x, clare) -> Skirmish(clare, phyllis))\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Skirmish(x, phyllis) -> Catalogue(phyllis, clare))\nforall x (Protecting(x) and Avulse(x, phyllis) -> Catalogue(phyllis, clare))\nnot Protecting(phyllis) -> Avulse(phyllis, bryana)\n\nCatalogue(phyllis, clare)\n\nSkirmish(phyllis, clare) and forall x (Skirmish(x, clare) -> Skirmish(clare, phyllis)) -> therefore Skirmish(clare, phyllis) Ominous(clare) and Skirmish(clare, phyllis) and forall x (Ominous(x) and Skirmish(x, phyllis) -> Catalogue(phyllis, clare)) -> therefore Catalogue(phyllis, clare)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The ivie eliminate the emmeline. The ivie eliminate the marit. The ivie opalise the marit. The emmeline is homonymic. The marit is plummy. The marit is homonymic. The marit brim the ivie. If someone is gallic then they need the emmeline. If someone brim the marit then they need the ivie. If someone eliminate the marit then the marit eliminate the ivie. If someone is plummy and they chase the ivie then the ivie brim the marit. If someone is pleural and they see the ivie then the ivie brim the marit. If the ivie is not pleural then the ivie opalise the emmeline. The ivie does not need the marit.", "logic": "\nEliminate(ivie, emmeline)\nEliminate(ivie, marit)\nOpalise(ivie, marit)\nHomonymic(emmeline)\nPlummy(marit)\nHomonymic(marit)\nBrim(marit, ivie)\nforall x (Gallic(x) -> Brim(x, emmeline))\nforall x (Brim(x, marit) -> Brim(x, ivie))\nforall x (Eliminate(x, marit) -> Eliminate(marit, ivie))\nforall x (Plummy(x) and Eliminate(x, ivie) -> Brim(ivie, marit))\nforall x (Pleural(x) and Opalise(x, ivie) -> Brim(ivie, marit))\nnot Pleural(ivie) -> Opalise(ivie, emmeline)\n\nnot Brim(ivie, marit)\n\nEliminate(ivie, marit) and forall x (Eliminate(x, marit) -> Eliminate(marit, ivie)) -> therefore Eliminate(marit, ivie) Plummy(marit) and Eliminate(marit, ivie) and forall x (Plummy(x) and Eliminate(x, ivie) -> Brim(ivie, marit)) -> therefore Brim(ivie, marit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The donovan carnify the owen. The donovan carnify the galen. The donovan denominate the galen. The owen is darkish. The galen is quondam. The galen is darkish. The galen scramble the donovan. If someone is undefeated then they need the owen. If someone scramble the galen then they need the donovan. If someone carnify the galen then the galen carnify the donovan. If someone is quondam and they chase the donovan then the donovan scramble the galen. If someone is shadowed and they see the donovan then the donovan scramble the galen. If the donovan is not shadowed then the donovan denominate the owen. The donovan scramble the donovan.", "logic": "\nCarnify(donovan, owen)\nCarnify(donovan, galen)\nDenominate(donovan, galen)\nDarkish(owen)\nQuondam(galen)\nDarkish(galen)\nScramble(galen, donovan)\nforall x (Undefeated(x) -> Scramble(x, owen))\nforall x (Scramble(x, galen) -> Scramble(x, donovan))\nforall x (Carnify(x, galen) -> Carnify(galen, donovan))\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Carnify(x, donovan) -> Scramble(donovan, galen))\nforall x (Shadowed(x) and Denominate(x, donovan) -> Scramble(donovan, galen))\nnot Shadowed(donovan) -> Denominate(donovan, owen)\n\nScramble(donovan, donovan)\n\nCarnify(donovan, galen) and forall x (Carnify(x, galen) -> Carnify(galen, donovan)) -> therefore Carnify(galen, donovan) Quondam(galen) and Carnify(galen, donovan) and forall x (Quondam(x) and Carnify(x, donovan) -> Scramble(donovan, galen)) -> therefore Scramble(donovan, galen) Scramble(donovan, galen) and forall x (Scramble(x, galen) -> Scramble(x, donovan)) -> therefore Scramble(donovan, donovan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The candi purr the rozalie. The candi purr the joe. The candi grip the joe. The rozalie is entozoic. The joe is bantering. The joe is entozoic. The joe flummox the candi. If someone is peachy then they need the rozalie. If someone flummox the joe then they need the candi. If someone purr the joe then the joe purr the candi. If someone is bantering and they chase the candi then the candi flummox the joe. If someone is bouldered and they see the candi then the candi flummox the joe. If the candi is not bouldered then the candi grip the rozalie. The candi does not need the candi.", "logic": "\nPurr(candi, rozalie)\nPurr(candi, joe)\nGrip(candi, joe)\nEntozoic(rozalie)\nBantering(joe)\nEntozoic(joe)\nFlummox(joe, candi)\nforall x (Peachy(x) -> Flummox(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Flummox(x, joe) -> Flummox(x, candi))\nforall x (Purr(x, joe) -> Purr(joe, candi))\nforall x (Bantering(x) and Purr(x, candi) -> Flummox(candi, joe))\nforall x (Bouldered(x) and Grip(x, candi) -> Flummox(candi, joe))\nnot Bouldered(candi) -> Grip(candi, rozalie)\n\nnot Flummox(candi, candi)\n\nPurr(candi, joe) and forall x (Purr(x, joe) -> Purr(joe, candi)) -> therefore Purr(joe, candi) Bantering(joe) and Purr(joe, candi) and forall x (Bantering(x) and Purr(x, candi) -> Flummox(candi, joe)) -> therefore Flummox(candi, joe) Flummox(candi, joe) and forall x (Flummox(x, joe) -> Flummox(x, candi)) -> therefore Flummox(candi, candi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The neil girdle the deane. The neil girdle the osmund. The neil thurify the osmund. The deane is disastrous. The osmund is tactical. The osmund is disastrous. The osmund lead the neil. If someone is semiannual then they need the deane. If someone lead the osmund then they need the neil. If someone girdle the osmund then the osmund girdle the neil. If someone is tactical and they chase the neil then the neil lead the osmund. If someone is drowsing and they see the neil then the neil lead the osmund. If the neil is not drowsing then the neil thurify the deane. The deane does not need the deane.", "logic": "\nGirdle(neil, deane)\nGirdle(neil, osmund)\nThurify(neil, osmund)\nDisastrous(deane)\nTactical(osmund)\nDisastrous(osmund)\nLead(osmund, neil)\nforall x (Semiannual(x) -> Lead(x, deane))\nforall x (Lead(x, osmund) -> Lead(x, neil))\nforall x (Girdle(x, osmund) -> Girdle(osmund, neil))\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Girdle(x, neil) -> Lead(neil, osmund))\nforall x (Drowsing(x) and Thurify(x, neil) -> Lead(neil, osmund))\nnot Drowsing(neil) -> Thurify(neil, deane)\n\nnot Lead(deane, deane)\n\nforall x (Semiannual(x) -> Lead(x, deane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The debbi burden the charmine. The debbi burden the greggory. The debbi whisper the greggory. The charmine is pyrogenic. The greggory is meandering. The greggory is pyrogenic. The greggory ting the debbi. If someone is scarred then they need the charmine. If someone ting the greggory then they need the debbi. If someone burden the greggory then the greggory burden the debbi. If someone is meandering and they chase the debbi then the debbi ting the greggory. If someone is testicular and they see the debbi then the debbi ting the greggory. If the debbi is not testicular then the debbi whisper the charmine. The greggory ting the charmine.", "logic": "\nBurden(debbi, charmine)\nBurden(debbi, greggory)\nWhisper(debbi, greggory)\nPyrogenic(charmine)\nMeandering(greggory)\nPyrogenic(greggory)\nTing(greggory, debbi)\nforall x (Scarred(x) -> Ting(x, charmine))\nforall x (Ting(x, greggory) -> Ting(x, debbi))\nforall x (Burden(x, greggory) -> Burden(greggory, debbi))\nforall x (Meandering(x) and Burden(x, debbi) -> Ting(debbi, greggory))\nforall x (Testicular(x) and Whisper(x, debbi) -> Ting(debbi, greggory))\nnot Testicular(debbi) -> Whisper(debbi, charmine)\n\nTing(greggory, charmine)\n\nforall x (Scarred(x) -> Ting(x, charmine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The franni prosecute the aloysia. The franni prosecute the shalom. The franni euphemize the shalom. The aloysia is grisly. The shalom is aphanitic. The shalom is grisly. The shalom wolf the franni. If someone is scrabbly then they need the aloysia. If someone wolf the shalom then they need the franni. If someone prosecute the shalom then the shalom prosecute the franni. If someone is aphanitic and they chase the franni then the franni wolf the shalom. If someone is unstilted and they see the franni then the franni wolf the shalom. If the franni is not unstilted then the franni euphemize the aloysia. The franni does not need the aloysia.", "logic": "\nProsecute(franni, aloysia)\nProsecute(franni, shalom)\nEuphemize(franni, shalom)\nGrisly(aloysia)\nAphanitic(shalom)\nGrisly(shalom)\nWolf(shalom, franni)\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) -> Wolf(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Wolf(x, shalom) -> Wolf(x, franni))\nforall x (Prosecute(x, shalom) -> Prosecute(shalom, franni))\nforall x (Aphanitic(x) and Prosecute(x, franni) -> Wolf(franni, shalom))\nforall x (Unstilted(x) and Euphemize(x, franni) -> Wolf(franni, shalom))\nnot Unstilted(franni) -> Euphemize(franni, aloysia)\n\nnot Wolf(franni, aloysia)\n\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) -> Wolf(x, aloysia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The zonnya delay the hayward. The zonnya delay the matilde. The zonnya disinvolve the matilde. The hayward is factious. The matilde is annular. The matilde is factious. The matilde grate the zonnya. If someone is splenetic then they need the hayward. If someone grate the matilde then they need the zonnya. If someone delay the matilde then the matilde delay the zonnya. If someone is annular and they chase the zonnya then the zonnya grate the matilde. If someone is withering and they see the zonnya then the zonnya grate the matilde. If the zonnya is not withering then the zonnya disinvolve the hayward. The hayward grate the zonnya.", "logic": "\nDelay(zonnya, hayward)\nDelay(zonnya, matilde)\nDisinvolve(zonnya, matilde)\nFactious(hayward)\nAnnular(matilde)\nFactious(matilde)\nGrate(matilde, zonnya)\nforall x (Splenetic(x) -> Grate(x, hayward))\nforall x (Grate(x, matilde) -> Grate(x, zonnya))\nforall x (Delay(x, matilde) -> Delay(matilde, zonnya))\nforall x (Annular(x) and Delay(x, zonnya) -> Grate(zonnya, matilde))\nforall x (Withering(x) and Disinvolve(x, zonnya) -> Grate(zonnya, matilde))\nnot Withering(zonnya) -> Disinvolve(zonnya, hayward)\n\nGrate(hayward, zonnya)\n\nforall x (Grate(x, matilde) -> Grate(x, zonnya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The karlene disabuse the hadley. The karlene disabuse the koo. The karlene renounce the koo. The hadley is secret. The koo is referent. The koo is secret. The koo swill the karlene. If someone is aural then they need the hadley. If someone swill the koo then they need the karlene. If someone disabuse the koo then the koo disabuse the karlene. If someone is referent and they chase the karlene then the karlene swill the koo. If someone is vulvar and they see the karlene then the karlene swill the koo. If the karlene is not vulvar then the karlene renounce the hadley. The koo does not see the hadley.", "logic": "\nDisabuse(karlene, hadley)\nDisabuse(karlene, koo)\nRenounce(karlene, koo)\nSecret(hadley)\nReferent(koo)\nSecret(koo)\nSwill(koo, karlene)\nforall x (Aural(x) -> Swill(x, hadley))\nforall x (Swill(x, koo) -> Swill(x, karlene))\nforall x (Disabuse(x, koo) -> Disabuse(koo, karlene))\nforall x (Referent(x) and Disabuse(x, karlene) -> Swill(karlene, koo))\nforall x (Vulvar(x) and Renounce(x, karlene) -> Swill(karlene, koo))\nnot Vulvar(karlene) -> Renounce(karlene, hadley)\n\nnot Renounce(koo, hadley)\n\nnot Renounce(koo, hadley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The pru manifold the boyd. The pru manifold the kizzie. The pru poetize the kizzie. The boyd is piagetian. The kizzie is swell. The kizzie is piagetian. The kizzie blacktop the pru. If someone is swazi then they need the boyd. If someone blacktop the kizzie then they need the pru. If someone manifold the kizzie then the kizzie manifold the pru. If someone is swell and they chase the pru then the pru blacktop the kizzie. If someone is baccate and they see the pru then the pru blacktop the kizzie. If the pru is not baccate then the pru poetize the boyd. The pru manifold the pru.", "logic": "\nManifold(pru, boyd)\nManifold(pru, kizzie)\nPoetize(pru, kizzie)\nPiagetian(boyd)\nSwell(kizzie)\nPiagetian(kizzie)\nBlacktop(kizzie, pru)\nforall x (Swazi(x) -> Blacktop(x, boyd))\nforall x (Blacktop(x, kizzie) -> Blacktop(x, pru))\nforall x (Manifold(x, kizzie) -> Manifold(kizzie, pru))\nforall x (Swell(x) and Manifold(x, pru) -> Blacktop(pru, kizzie))\nforall x (Baccate(x) and Poetize(x, pru) -> Blacktop(pru, kizzie))\nnot Baccate(pru) -> Poetize(pru, boyd)\n\nManifold(pru, pru)\n\nManifold(pru, pru) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The carma aspire the dasya. The carma aspire the georgy. The carma concede the georgy. The dasya is fallow. The georgy is logistic. The georgy is fallow. The georgy solve the carma. If someone is brachial then they need the dasya. If someone solve the georgy then they need the carma. If someone aspire the georgy then the georgy aspire the carma. If someone is logistic and they chase the carma then the carma solve the georgy. If someone is isotopic and they see the carma then the carma solve the georgy. If the carma is not isotopic then the carma concede the dasya. The dasya does not see the carma.", "logic": "\nAspire(carma, dasya)\nAspire(carma, georgy)\nConcede(carma, georgy)\nFallow(dasya)\nLogistic(georgy)\nFallow(georgy)\nSolve(georgy, carma)\nforall x (Brachial(x) -> Solve(x, dasya))\nforall x (Solve(x, georgy) -> Solve(x, carma))\nforall x (Aspire(x, georgy) -> Aspire(georgy, carma))\nforall x (Logistic(x) and Aspire(x, carma) -> Solve(carma, georgy))\nforall x (Isotopic(x) and Concede(x, carma) -> Solve(carma, georgy))\nnot Isotopic(carma) -> Concede(carma, dasya)\n\nnot Concede(dasya, carma)\n\nnot Concede(dasya, carma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The theodore callous the ronda. The theodore callous the annie. The theodore transit the annie. The ronda is capitulary. The annie is diffused. The annie is capitulary. The annie supple the theodore. If someone is homeward then they need the ronda. If someone supple the annie then they need the theodore. If someone callous the annie then the annie callous the theodore. If someone is diffused and they chase the theodore then the theodore supple the annie. If someone is suntanned and they see the theodore then the theodore supple the annie. If the theodore is not suntanned then the theodore transit the ronda. The ronda transit the ronda.", "logic": "\nCallous(theodore, ronda)\nCallous(theodore, annie)\nTransit(theodore, annie)\nCapitulary(ronda)\nDiffused(annie)\nCapitulary(annie)\nSupple(annie, theodore)\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Supple(x, ronda))\nforall x (Supple(x, annie) -> Supple(x, theodore))\nforall x (Callous(x, annie) -> Callous(annie, theodore))\nforall x (Diffused(x) and Callous(x, theodore) -> Supple(theodore, annie))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) and Transit(x, theodore) -> Supple(theodore, annie))\nnot Suntanned(theodore) -> Transit(theodore, ronda)\n\nTransit(ronda, ronda)\n\nTransit(ronda, ronda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Lee is discrepant. Adriana is prefrontal. Mauricio is glazed. Smart people are semisolid. All semisolid, glazed people are mnemonic. If someone is mnemonic then they are ornamental. Lee is discrepant.", "logic": "\nDiscrepant(lee)\nPrefrontal(adriana)\nGlazed(mauricio)\nforall x (Glazed(x) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Semisolid(x) and Glazed(x) -> Mnemonic(x))\nforall x (Mnemonic(x) -> Ornamental(x))\n\nDiscrepant(lee)\n\ntherefore Discrepant(lee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Maridel is wysiwyg. Dolley is delusive. Jewel is continual. Smart people are brickly. All brickly, continual people are gaumless. If someone is gaumless then they are uninjured. Dolley is not delusive.", "logic": "\nWysiwyg(maridel)\nDelusive(dolley)\nContinual(jewel)\nforall x (Continual(x) -> Brickly(x))\nforall x (Brickly(x) and Continual(x) -> Gaumless(x))\nforall x (Gaumless(x) -> Uninjured(x))\n\nnot Delusive(dolley)\n\ntherefore Delusive(dolley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Mufi is untethered. Micheline is bilingual. Emeline is tapestried. Smart people are silvan. All silvan, tapestried people are trained. If someone is trained then they are understood. Emeline is silvan.", "logic": "\nUntethered(mufi)\nBilingual(micheline)\nTapestried(emeline)\nforall x (Tapestried(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Silvan(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Trained(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Understood(x))\n\nSilvan(emeline)\n\nTapestried(emeline) and forall x (Tapestried(x) -> Silvan(x)) -> therefore Silvan(emeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Sargent is propertied. Irena is figurative. Rebekkah is moral. Smart people are ambulant. All ambulant, moral people are unthawed. If someone is unthawed then they are littler. Rebekkah is not ambulant.", "logic": "\nPropertied(sargent)\nFigurative(irena)\nMoral(rebekkah)\nforall x (Moral(x) -> Ambulant(x))\nforall x (Ambulant(x) and Moral(x) -> Unthawed(x))\nforall x (Unthawed(x) -> Littler(x))\n\nnot Ambulant(rebekkah)\n\nMoral(rebekkah) and forall x (Moral(x) -> Ambulant(x)) -> therefore Ambulant(rebekkah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Tessi is expiratory. Lee is underhand. Orella is unlike. Smart people are eared. All eared, unlike people are salacious. If someone is salacious then they are myotic. Orella is salacious.", "logic": "\nExpiratory(tessi)\nUnderhand(lee)\nUnlike(orella)\nforall x (Unlike(x) -> Eared(x))\nforall x (Eared(x) and Unlike(x) -> Salacious(x))\nforall x (Salacious(x) -> Myotic(x))\n\nSalacious(orella)\n\nUnlike(orella) and forall x (Unlike(x) -> Eared(x)) -> therefore Eared(orella) Eared(orella) and Unlike(orella) and forall x (Eared(x) and Unlike(x) -> Salacious(x)) -> therefore Salacious(orella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Elyse is fahrenheit. Jayme is neurotoxic. Arlene is folksy. Smart people are viral. All viral, folksy people are thin. If someone is thin then they are devoted. Arlene is not thin.", "logic": "\nFahrenheit(elyse)\nNeurotoxic(jayme)\nFolksy(arlene)\nforall x (Folksy(x) -> Viral(x))\nforall x (Viral(x) and Folksy(x) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Thin(x) -> Devoted(x))\n\nnot Thin(arlene)\n\nFolksy(arlene) and forall x (Folksy(x) -> Viral(x)) -> therefore Viral(arlene) Viral(arlene) and Folksy(arlene) and forall x (Viral(x) and Folksy(x) -> Thin(x)) -> therefore Thin(arlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Gavin is maximising. Marcio is rotund. Whittaker is platyrhine. Smart people are semitropic. All semitropic, platyrhine people are augitic. If someone is augitic then they are penciled. Whittaker is penciled.", "logic": "\nMaximising(gavin)\nRotund(marcio)\nPlatyrhine(whittaker)\nforall x (Platyrhine(x) -> Semitropic(x))\nforall x (Semitropic(x) and Platyrhine(x) -> Augitic(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Penciled(x))\n\nPenciled(whittaker)\n\nPlatyrhine(whittaker) and forall x (Platyrhine(x) -> Semitropic(x)) -> therefore Semitropic(whittaker) Semitropic(whittaker) and Platyrhine(whittaker) and forall x (Semitropic(x) and Platyrhine(x) -> Augitic(x)) -> therefore Augitic(whittaker) Augitic(whittaker) and forall x (Augitic(x) -> Penciled(x)) -> therefore Penciled(whittaker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Clarita is sickening. Dante is direful. Hermina is uncultured. Smart people are negligent. All negligent, uncultured people are reinforced. If someone is reinforced then they are accustomed. Hermina is not accustomed.", "logic": "\nSickening(clarita)\nDireful(dante)\nUncultured(hermina)\nforall x (Uncultured(x) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nforall x (Reinforced(x) -> Accustomed(x))\n\nnot Accustomed(hermina)\n\nUncultured(hermina) and forall x (Uncultured(x) -> Negligent(x)) -> therefore Negligent(hermina) Negligent(hermina) and Uncultured(hermina) and forall x (Negligent(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Reinforced(x)) -> therefore Reinforced(hermina) Reinforced(hermina) and forall x (Reinforced(x) -> Accustomed(x)) -> therefore Accustomed(hermina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Carrie is sluggish. Camala is interlaced. Zorana is cubistic. Smart people are aldermanic. All aldermanic, cubistic people are dragging. If someone is dragging then they are avionic. Camala is not dragging.", "logic": "\nSluggish(carrie)\nInterlaced(camala)\nCubistic(zorana)\nforall x (Cubistic(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\nforall x (Aldermanic(x) and Cubistic(x) -> Dragging(x))\nforall x (Dragging(x) -> Avionic(x))\n\nnot Dragging(camala)\n\nforall x (Aldermanic(x) and Cubistic(x) -> Dragging(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Wit is uncombable. Becka is unbent. Mersey is pendant. Smart people are semiliquid. All semiliquid, pendant people are light. If someone is light then they are exalting. Wit is light.", "logic": "\nUncombable(wit)\nUnbent(becka)\nPendant(mersey)\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Pendant(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Exalting(x))\n\nLight(wit)\n\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Pendant(x) -> Light(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Jenna is seaworthy. Hymie is emaciated. Heather is phosphoric. Smart people are genealogic. All genealogic, phosphoric people are ruthless. If someone is ruthless then they are inward. Jenna is not genealogic.", "logic": "\nSeaworthy(jenna)\nEmaciated(hymie)\nPhosphoric(heather)\nforall x (Phosphoric(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nforall x (Genealogic(x) and Phosphoric(x) -> Ruthless(x))\nforall x (Ruthless(x) -> Inward(x))\n\nnot Genealogic(jenna)\n\nforall x (Phosphoric(x) -> Genealogic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Weber is exhausting. Doralyn is quantized. Carita is slipping. Smart people are threefold. All threefold, slipping people are southbound. If someone is southbound then they are libellous. Weber is libellous.", "logic": "\nExhausting(weber)\nQuantized(doralyn)\nSlipping(carita)\nforall x (Slipping(x) -> Threefold(x))\nforall x (Threefold(x) and Slipping(x) -> Southbound(x))\nforall x (Southbound(x) -> Libellous(x))\n\nLibellous(weber)\n\nforall x (Southbound(x) -> Libellous(x)) <- forall x (Threefold(x) and Slipping(x) -> Southbound(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Naoma is ectozoan. Trevor is inevitable. Lev is gaelic. Smart people are tusked. All tusked, gaelic people are towering. If someone is towering then they are eastside. Trevor is not blue.", "logic": "\nEctozoan(naoma)\nInevitable(trevor)\nGaelic(lev)\nforall x (Gaelic(x) -> Tusked(x))\nforall x (Tusked(x) and Gaelic(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Towering(x) -> Eastside(x))\n\nnot Blue(trevor)\n\nnot Blue(trevor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Rodd is blae. Marcie is xliii. Nert is agonising. Smart people are nonprofit. All nonprofit, agonising people are prepared. If someone is prepared then they are regardless. Nert is blue.", "logic": "\nBlae(rodd)\nXliii(marcie)\nAgonising(nert)\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) and Agonising(x) -> Prepared(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Regardless(x))\n\nBlue(nert)\n\nBlue(nert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Jewell is spangled. Robinia is squarish. Gladi is jugular. Smart people are unclaimed. All unclaimed, jugular people are confiding. If someone is confiding then they are nocent. Jewell is not jugular.", "logic": "\nSpangled(jewell)\nSquarish(robinia)\nJugular(gladi)\nforall x (Jugular(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) and Jugular(x) -> Confiding(x))\nforall x (Confiding(x) -> Nocent(x))\n\nnot Jugular(jewell)\n\nnot Jugular(jewell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Loria is culinary. Maris is leal. Darryl is aculeated. Smart people are unpatented. All unpatented, aculeated people are patented. If someone is patented then they are anorectic. Loria is leal.", "logic": "\nCulinary(loria)\nLeal(maris)\nAculeated(darryl)\nforall x (Aculeated(x) -> Unpatented(x))\nforall x (Unpatented(x) and Aculeated(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Anorectic(x))\n\nLeal(loria)\n\nLeal(loria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Nelly is reductive. Nelly is apodal. Nelly is unpotted. Nelly is lazy. Nelly is granular. Nelly is galling. Eveline is reductive. Eveline is apodal. Eveline is buddhistic. Eveline is unpotted. Eveline is lazy. Eveline is granular. Eveline is galling. Angela is reductive. Angela is granular. Angela is galling. Rough things are apodal. If something is reductive then it is granular. All unpotted, galling things are lazy. If Angela is granular then Angela is buddhistic. Round, galling things are unpotted. Big, apodal things are lazy. Angela is granular.", "logic": "\nReductive(nelly)\nApodal(nelly)\nUnpotted(nelly)\nLazy(nelly)\nGranular(nelly)\nGalling(nelly)\nReductive(eveline)\nApodal(eveline)\nBuddhistic(eveline)\nUnpotted(eveline)\nLazy(eveline)\nGranular(eveline)\nGalling(eveline)\nReductive(angela)\nGranular(angela)\nGalling(angela)\nforall x (Lazy(x) -> Apodal(x))\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Granular(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) and Galling(x) -> Lazy(x))\nGranular(angela) -> Buddhistic(angela)\nforall x (Granular(x) and Galling(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Reductive(x) and Apodal(x) -> Lazy(x))\n\nGranular(angela)\n\ntherefore Granular(angela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Carena is hulking. Carena is mohammedan. Carena is fertile. Carena is muted. Carena is adulatory. Carena is chargeable. Gabrielle is hulking. Gabrielle is mohammedan. Gabrielle is prior. Gabrielle is fertile. Gabrielle is muted. Gabrielle is adulatory. Gabrielle is chargeable. Shaun is hulking. Shaun is adulatory. Shaun is chargeable. Rough things are mohammedan. If something is hulking then it is adulatory. All fertile, chargeable things are muted. If Shaun is adulatory then Shaun is prior. Round, chargeable things are fertile. Big, mohammedan things are muted. Carena is not muted.", "logic": "\nHulking(carena)\nMohammedan(carena)\nFertile(carena)\nMuted(carena)\nAdulatory(carena)\nChargeable(carena)\nHulking(gabrielle)\nMohammedan(gabrielle)\nPrior(gabrielle)\nFertile(gabrielle)\nMuted(gabrielle)\nAdulatory(gabrielle)\nChargeable(gabrielle)\nHulking(shaun)\nAdulatory(shaun)\nChargeable(shaun)\nforall x (Muted(x) -> Mohammedan(x))\nforall x (Hulking(x) -> Adulatory(x))\nforall x (Fertile(x) and Chargeable(x) -> Muted(x))\nAdulatory(shaun) -> Prior(shaun)\nforall x (Adulatory(x) and Chargeable(x) -> Fertile(x))\nforall x (Hulking(x) and Mohammedan(x) -> Muted(x))\n\nnot Muted(carena)\n\ntherefore Muted(carena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Jonas is woozy. Jonas is tasmanian. Jonas is overarm. Jonas is bizonal. Jonas is handsome. Jonas is aneurysmal. Ree is woozy. Ree is tasmanian. Ree is blotto. Ree is overarm. Ree is bizonal. Ree is handsome. Ree is aneurysmal. Sax is woozy. Sax is handsome. Sax is aneurysmal. Rough things are tasmanian. If something is woozy then it is handsome. All overarm, aneurysmal things are bizonal. If Sax is handsome then Sax is blotto. Round, aneurysmal things are overarm. Big, tasmanian things are bizonal. Sax is blotto.", "logic": "\nWoozy(jonas)\nTasmanian(jonas)\nOverarm(jonas)\nBizonal(jonas)\nHandsome(jonas)\nAneurysmal(jonas)\nWoozy(ree)\nTasmanian(ree)\nBlotto(ree)\nOverarm(ree)\nBizonal(ree)\nHandsome(ree)\nAneurysmal(ree)\nWoozy(sax)\nHandsome(sax)\nAneurysmal(sax)\nforall x (Bizonal(x) -> Tasmanian(x))\nforall x (Woozy(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Overarm(x) and Aneurysmal(x) -> Bizonal(x))\nHandsome(sax) -> Blotto(sax)\nforall x (Handsome(x) and Aneurysmal(x) -> Overarm(x))\nforall x (Woozy(x) and Tasmanian(x) -> Bizonal(x))\n\nBlotto(sax)\n\nHandsome(sax) and Handsome(sax) -> Blotto(sax) -> therefore Blotto(sax)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Christyna is caroline. Christyna is parental. Christyna is inapposite. Christyna is mortified. Christyna is ovarian. Christyna is lascivious. Wynny is caroline. Wynny is parental. Wynny is vertebral. Wynny is inapposite. Wynny is mortified. Wynny is ovarian. Wynny is lascivious. Dorena is caroline. Dorena is ovarian. Dorena is lascivious. Rough things are parental. If something is caroline then it is ovarian. All inapposite, lascivious things are mortified. If Dorena is ovarian then Dorena is vertebral. Round, lascivious things are inapposite. Big, parental things are mortified. Dorena is not inapposite.", "logic": "\nCaroline(christyna)\nParental(christyna)\nInapposite(christyna)\nMortified(christyna)\nOvarian(christyna)\nLascivious(christyna)\nCaroline(wynny)\nParental(wynny)\nVertebral(wynny)\nInapposite(wynny)\nMortified(wynny)\nOvarian(wynny)\nLascivious(wynny)\nCaroline(dorena)\nOvarian(dorena)\nLascivious(dorena)\nforall x (Mortified(x) -> Parental(x))\nforall x (Caroline(x) -> Ovarian(x))\nforall x (Inapposite(x) and Lascivious(x) -> Mortified(x))\nOvarian(dorena) -> Vertebral(dorena)\nforall x (Ovarian(x) and Lascivious(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Caroline(x) and Parental(x) -> Mortified(x))\n\nnot Inapposite(dorena)\n\nOvarian(dorena) and Lascivious(dorena) and forall x (Ovarian(x) and Lascivious(x) -> Inapposite(x)) -> therefore Inapposite(dorena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Shirleen is boastful. Shirleen is unbendable. Shirleen is trochaic. Shirleen is firstborn. Shirleen is thankful. Shirleen is magnified. Demetris is boastful. Demetris is unbendable. Demetris is peculiar. Demetris is trochaic. Demetris is firstborn. Demetris is thankful. Demetris is magnified. Kaile is boastful. Kaile is thankful. Kaile is magnified. Rough things are unbendable. If something is boastful then it is thankful. All trochaic, magnified things are firstborn. If Kaile is thankful then Kaile is peculiar. Round, magnified things are trochaic. Big, unbendable things are firstborn. Kaile is firstborn.", "logic": "\nBoastful(shirleen)\nUnbendable(shirleen)\nTrochaic(shirleen)\nFirstborn(shirleen)\nThankful(shirleen)\nMagnified(shirleen)\nBoastful(demetris)\nUnbendable(demetris)\nPeculiar(demetris)\nTrochaic(demetris)\nFirstborn(demetris)\nThankful(demetris)\nMagnified(demetris)\nBoastful(kaile)\nThankful(kaile)\nMagnified(kaile)\nforall x (Firstborn(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Boastful(x) -> Thankful(x))\nforall x (Trochaic(x) and Magnified(x) -> Firstborn(x))\nThankful(kaile) -> Peculiar(kaile)\nforall x (Thankful(x) and Magnified(x) -> Trochaic(x))\nforall x (Boastful(x) and Unbendable(x) -> Firstborn(x))\n\nFirstborn(kaile)\n\nThankful(kaile) and Magnified(kaile) and forall x (Thankful(x) and Magnified(x) -> Trochaic(x)) -> therefore Trochaic(kaile) Trochaic(kaile) and Magnified(kaile) and forall x (Trochaic(x) and Magnified(x) -> Firstborn(x)) -> therefore Firstborn(kaile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Vikki is perplexed. Vikki is resinlike. Vikki is aspiring. Vikki is defensive. Vikki is profitless. Vikki is allophonic. Tomlin is perplexed. Tomlin is resinlike. Tomlin is urbanised. Tomlin is aspiring. Tomlin is defensive. Tomlin is profitless. Tomlin is allophonic. Liza is perplexed. Liza is profitless. Liza is allophonic. Rough things are resinlike. If something is perplexed then it is profitless. All aspiring, allophonic things are defensive. If Liza is profitless then Liza is urbanised. Round, allophonic things are aspiring. Big, resinlike things are defensive. Liza is not defensive.", "logic": "\nPerplexed(vikki)\nResinlike(vikki)\nAspiring(vikki)\nDefensive(vikki)\nProfitless(vikki)\nAllophonic(vikki)\nPerplexed(tomlin)\nResinlike(tomlin)\nUrbanised(tomlin)\nAspiring(tomlin)\nDefensive(tomlin)\nProfitless(tomlin)\nAllophonic(tomlin)\nPerplexed(liza)\nProfitless(liza)\nAllophonic(liza)\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Resinlike(x))\nforall x (Perplexed(x) -> Profitless(x))\nforall x (Aspiring(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Defensive(x))\nProfitless(liza) -> Urbanised(liza)\nforall x (Profitless(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Aspiring(x))\nforall x (Perplexed(x) and Resinlike(x) -> Defensive(x))\n\nnot Defensive(liza)\n\nProfitless(liza) and Allophonic(liza) and forall x (Profitless(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Aspiring(x)) -> therefore Aspiring(liza) Aspiring(liza) and Allophonic(liza) and forall x (Aspiring(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Defensive(x)) -> therefore Defensive(liza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Kalvin is buggy. Kalvin is berrylike. Kalvin is hornlike. Kalvin is tempting. Kalvin is blinded. Kalvin is ethnical. Alyss is buggy. Alyss is berrylike. Alyss is madagascan. Alyss is hornlike. Alyss is tempting. Alyss is blinded. Alyss is ethnical. Brittney is buggy. Brittney is blinded. Brittney is ethnical. Rough things are berrylike. If something is buggy then it is blinded. All hornlike, ethnical things are tempting. If Brittney is blinded then Brittney is madagascan. Round, ethnical things are hornlike. Big, berrylike things are tempting. Brittney is berrylike.", "logic": "\nBuggy(kalvin)\nBerrylike(kalvin)\nHornlike(kalvin)\nTempting(kalvin)\nBlinded(kalvin)\nEthnical(kalvin)\nBuggy(alyss)\nBerrylike(alyss)\nMadagascan(alyss)\nHornlike(alyss)\nTempting(alyss)\nBlinded(alyss)\nEthnical(alyss)\nBuggy(brittney)\nBlinded(brittney)\nEthnical(brittney)\nforall x (Tempting(x) -> Berrylike(x))\nforall x (Buggy(x) -> Blinded(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Tempting(x))\nBlinded(brittney) -> Madagascan(brittney)\nforall x (Blinded(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Hornlike(x))\nforall x (Buggy(x) and Berrylike(x) -> Tempting(x))\n\nBerrylike(brittney)\n\nBlinded(brittney) and Ethnical(brittney) and forall x (Blinded(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Hornlike(x)) -> therefore Hornlike(brittney) Hornlike(brittney) and Ethnical(brittney) and forall x (Hornlike(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Tempting(x)) -> therefore Tempting(brittney) Tempting(brittney) and forall x (Tempting(x) -> Berrylike(x)) -> therefore Berrylike(brittney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Gerard is patriotic. Gerard is proud. Gerard is unnoticed. Gerard is chestnut. Gerard is yugoslav. Gerard is centered. Tonnie is patriotic. Tonnie is proud. Tonnie is shifting. Tonnie is unnoticed. Tonnie is chestnut. Tonnie is yugoslav. Tonnie is centered. Corette is patriotic. Corette is yugoslav. Corette is centered. Rough things are proud. If something is patriotic then it is yugoslav. All unnoticed, centered things are chestnut. If Corette is yugoslav then Corette is shifting. Round, centered things are unnoticed. Big, proud things are chestnut. Corette is not proud.", "logic": "\nPatriotic(gerard)\nProud(gerard)\nUnnoticed(gerard)\nChestnut(gerard)\nYugoslav(gerard)\nCentered(gerard)\nPatriotic(tonnie)\nProud(tonnie)\nShifting(tonnie)\nUnnoticed(tonnie)\nChestnut(tonnie)\nYugoslav(tonnie)\nCentered(tonnie)\nPatriotic(corette)\nYugoslav(corette)\nCentered(corette)\nforall x (Chestnut(x) -> Proud(x))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) -> Yugoslav(x))\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) and Centered(x) -> Chestnut(x))\nYugoslav(corette) -> Shifting(corette)\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) and Centered(x) -> Unnoticed(x))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) and Proud(x) -> Chestnut(x))\n\nnot Proud(corette)\n\nYugoslav(corette) and Centered(corette) and forall x (Yugoslav(x) and Centered(x) -> Unnoticed(x)) -> therefore Unnoticed(corette) Unnoticed(corette) and Centered(corette) and forall x (Unnoticed(x) and Centered(x) -> Chestnut(x)) -> therefore Chestnut(corette) Chestnut(corette) and forall x (Chestnut(x) -> Proud(x)) -> therefore Proud(corette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "The ronald is favorite. The ronald predestine the arlene. The ronald predestine the dix. The ronald toboggan the dix. The arlene is australian. The arlene is sensitised. The arlene predestine the dix. The arlene resew the dix. The dix is favorite. The dix is australian. The dix toboggan the arlene. The dix resew the arlene. If something is favorite then it predestine the dix. If something is favorite and it predestine the dix then it toboggan the ronald. If something predestine the dix then the dix toboggan the arlene. If something resew the dix then it is beaked. If something is beaked then it is favorite. If the arlene toboggan the ronald and the ronald resew the dix then the arlene toboggan the dix. The ronald toboggan the dix.", "logic": "\nFavorite(ronald)\nPredestine(ronald, arlene)\nPredestine(ronald, dix)\nToboggan(ronald, dix)\nAustralian(arlene)\nSensitised(arlene)\nPredestine(arlene, dix)\nResew(arlene, dix)\nFavorite(dix)\nAustralian(dix)\nToboggan(dix, arlene)\nResew(dix, arlene)\nforall x (Favorite(x) -> Predestine(x, dix))\nforall x (Favorite(x) and Predestine(x, dix) -> Toboggan(x, ronald))\nforall x (Predestine(x, dix) -> Toboggan(dix, arlene))\nforall x (Resew(x, dix) -> Beaked(x))\nforall x (Beaked(x) -> Favorite(x))\nToboggan(arlene, ronald) and Resew(ronald, dix) -> Toboggan(arlene, dix)\n\nToboggan(ronald, dix)\n\ntherefore Toboggan(ronald, dix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The antonia is rentable. The antonia coquet the maxie. The antonia coquet the marya. The antonia bask the marya. The maxie is cybernetic. The maxie is mutinous. The maxie coquet the marya. The maxie oppugn the marya. The marya is rentable. The marya is cybernetic. The marya bask the maxie. The marya oppugn the maxie. If something is rentable then it coquet the marya. If something is rentable and it coquet the marya then it bask the antonia. If something coquet the marya then the marya bask the maxie. If something oppugn the marya then it is erring. If something is erring then it is rentable. If the maxie bask the antonia and the antonia oppugn the marya then the maxie bask the marya. The antonia does not need the marya.", "logic": "\nRentable(antonia)\nCoquet(antonia, maxie)\nCoquet(antonia, marya)\nBask(antonia, marya)\nCybernetic(maxie)\nMutinous(maxie)\nCoquet(maxie, marya)\nOppugn(maxie, marya)\nRentable(marya)\nCybernetic(marya)\nBask(marya, maxie)\nOppugn(marya, maxie)\nforall x (Rentable(x) -> Coquet(x, marya))\nforall x (Rentable(x) and Coquet(x, marya) -> Bask(x, antonia))\nforall x (Coquet(x, marya) -> Bask(marya, maxie))\nforall x (Oppugn(x, marya) -> Erring(x))\nforall x (Erring(x) -> Rentable(x))\nBask(maxie, antonia) and Oppugn(antonia, marya) -> Bask(maxie, marya)\n\nnot Bask(antonia, marya)\n\ntherefore Bask(antonia, marya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The stevy is eyed. The stevy laugh the arlette. The stevy laugh the hendrika. The stevy thieve the hendrika. The arlette is liquid. The arlette is rhapsodic. The arlette laugh the hendrika. The arlette miscount the hendrika. The hendrika is eyed. The hendrika is liquid. The hendrika thieve the arlette. The hendrika miscount the arlette. If something is eyed then it laugh the hendrika. If something is eyed and it laugh the hendrika then it thieve the stevy. If something laugh the hendrika then the hendrika thieve the arlette. If something miscount the hendrika then it is hemolytic. If something is hemolytic then it is eyed. If the arlette thieve the stevy and the stevy miscount the hendrika then the arlette thieve the hendrika. The hendrika laugh the hendrika.", "logic": "\nEyed(stevy)\nLaugh(stevy, arlette)\nLaugh(stevy, hendrika)\nThieve(stevy, hendrika)\nLiquid(arlette)\nRhapsodic(arlette)\nLaugh(arlette, hendrika)\nMiscount(arlette, hendrika)\nEyed(hendrika)\nLiquid(hendrika)\nThieve(hendrika, arlette)\nMiscount(hendrika, arlette)\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Laugh(x, hendrika))\nforall x (Eyed(x) and Laugh(x, hendrika) -> Thieve(x, stevy))\nforall x (Laugh(x, hendrika) -> Thieve(hendrika, arlette))\nforall x (Miscount(x, hendrika) -> Hemolytic(x))\nforall x (Hemolytic(x) -> Eyed(x))\nThieve(arlette, stevy) and Miscount(stevy, hendrika) -> Thieve(arlette, hendrika)\n\nLaugh(hendrika, hendrika)\n\nEyed(hendrika) and forall x (Eyed(x) -> Laugh(x, hendrika)) -> therefore Laugh(hendrika, hendrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The tella is lettered. The tella swap the arlen. The tella swap the andrey. The tella lilt the andrey. The arlen is anaglyphic. The arlen is incursive. The arlen swap the andrey. The arlen colourise the andrey. The andrey is lettered. The andrey is anaglyphic. The andrey lilt the arlen. The andrey colourise the arlen. If something is lettered then it swap the andrey. If something is lettered and it swap the andrey then it lilt the tella. If something swap the andrey then the andrey lilt the arlen. If something colourise the andrey then it is unsmooth. If something is unsmooth then it is lettered. If the arlen lilt the tella and the tella colourise the andrey then the arlen lilt the andrey. The tella does not need the tella.", "logic": "\nLettered(tella)\nSwap(tella, arlen)\nSwap(tella, andrey)\nLilt(tella, andrey)\nAnaglyphic(arlen)\nIncursive(arlen)\nSwap(arlen, andrey)\nColourise(arlen, andrey)\nLettered(andrey)\nAnaglyphic(andrey)\nLilt(andrey, arlen)\nColourise(andrey, arlen)\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Swap(x, andrey))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Swap(x, andrey) -> Lilt(x, tella))\nforall x (Swap(x, andrey) -> Lilt(andrey, arlen))\nforall x (Colourise(x, andrey) -> Unsmooth(x))\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Lettered(x))\nLilt(arlen, tella) and Colourise(tella, andrey) -> Lilt(arlen, andrey)\n\nnot Lilt(tella, tella)\n\nLettered(tella) and Swap(tella, andrey) and forall x (Lettered(x) and Swap(x, andrey) -> Lilt(x, tella)) -> therefore Lilt(tella, tella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The aleece is comestible. The aleece inure the reba. The aleece inure the una. The aleece motorboat the una. The reba is cerulean. The reba is opencast. The reba inure the una. The reba emend the una. The una is comestible. The una is cerulean. The una motorboat the reba. The una emend the reba. If something is comestible then it inure the una. If something is comestible and it inure the una then it motorboat the aleece. If something inure the una then the una motorboat the reba. If something emend the una then it is whatsoever. If something is whatsoever then it is comestible. If the reba motorboat the aleece and the aleece emend the una then the reba motorboat the una. The reba is comestible.", "logic": "\nComestible(aleece)\nInure(aleece, reba)\nInure(aleece, una)\nMotorboat(aleece, una)\nCerulean(reba)\nOpencast(reba)\nInure(reba, una)\nEmend(reba, una)\nComestible(una)\nCerulean(una)\nMotorboat(una, reba)\nEmend(una, reba)\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Inure(x, una))\nforall x (Comestible(x) and Inure(x, una) -> Motorboat(x, aleece))\nforall x (Inure(x, una) -> Motorboat(una, reba))\nforall x (Emend(x, una) -> Whatsoever(x))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Comestible(x))\nMotorboat(reba, aleece) and Emend(aleece, una) -> Motorboat(reba, una)\n\nComestible(reba)\n\nEmend(reba, una) and forall x (Emend(x, una) -> Whatsoever(x)) -> therefore Whatsoever(reba) Whatsoever(reba) and forall x (Whatsoever(x) -> Comestible(x)) -> therefore Comestible(reba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The amandi is governing. The amandi underlay the feliza. The amandi underlay the nisa. The amandi autotomise the nisa. The feliza is corymbose. The feliza is palmy. The feliza underlay the nisa. The feliza solarise the nisa. The nisa is governing. The nisa is corymbose. The nisa autotomise the feliza. The nisa solarise the feliza. If something is governing then it underlay the nisa. If something is governing and it underlay the nisa then it autotomise the amandi. If something underlay the nisa then the nisa autotomise the feliza. If something solarise the nisa then it is untalented. If something is untalented then it is governing. If the feliza autotomise the amandi and the amandi solarise the nisa then the feliza autotomise the nisa. The nisa does not need the amandi.", "logic": "\nGoverning(amandi)\nUnderlay(amandi, feliza)\nUnderlay(amandi, nisa)\nAutotomise(amandi, nisa)\nCorymbose(feliza)\nPalmy(feliza)\nUnderlay(feliza, nisa)\nSolarise(feliza, nisa)\nGoverning(nisa)\nCorymbose(nisa)\nAutotomise(nisa, feliza)\nSolarise(nisa, feliza)\nforall x (Governing(x) -> Underlay(x, nisa))\nforall x (Governing(x) and Underlay(x, nisa) -> Autotomise(x, amandi))\nforall x (Underlay(x, nisa) -> Autotomise(nisa, feliza))\nforall x (Solarise(x, nisa) -> Untalented(x))\nforall x (Untalented(x) -> Governing(x))\nAutotomise(feliza, amandi) and Solarise(amandi, nisa) -> Autotomise(feliza, nisa)\n\nnot Autotomise(nisa, amandi)\n\nGoverning(nisa) and forall x (Governing(x) -> Underlay(x, nisa)) -> therefore Underlay(nisa, nisa) Governing(nisa) and Underlay(nisa, nisa) and forall x (Governing(x) and Underlay(x, nisa) -> Autotomise(x, amandi)) -> therefore Autotomise(nisa, amandi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The hamlen is loathly. The hamlen enthral the mommy. The hamlen enthral the jacinta. The hamlen disfavour the jacinta. The mommy is gluey. The mommy is congested. The mommy enthral the jacinta. The mommy complement the jacinta. The jacinta is loathly. The jacinta is gluey. The jacinta disfavour the mommy. The jacinta complement the mommy. If something is loathly then it enthral the jacinta. If something is loathly and it enthral the jacinta then it disfavour the hamlen. If something enthral the jacinta then the jacinta disfavour the mommy. If something complement the jacinta then it is molten. If something is molten then it is loathly. If the mommy disfavour the hamlen and the hamlen complement the jacinta then the mommy disfavour the jacinta. The mommy disfavour the hamlen.", "logic": "\nLoathly(hamlen)\nEnthral(hamlen, mommy)\nEnthral(hamlen, jacinta)\nDisfavour(hamlen, jacinta)\nGluey(mommy)\nCongested(mommy)\nEnthral(mommy, jacinta)\nComplement(mommy, jacinta)\nLoathly(jacinta)\nGluey(jacinta)\nDisfavour(jacinta, mommy)\nComplement(jacinta, mommy)\nforall x (Loathly(x) -> Enthral(x, jacinta))\nforall x (Loathly(x) and Enthral(x, jacinta) -> Disfavour(x, hamlen))\nforall x (Enthral(x, jacinta) -> Disfavour(jacinta, mommy))\nforall x (Complement(x, jacinta) -> Molten(x))\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Loathly(x))\nDisfavour(mommy, hamlen) and Complement(hamlen, jacinta) -> Disfavour(mommy, jacinta)\n\nDisfavour(mommy, hamlen)\n\nComplement(mommy, jacinta) and forall x (Complement(x, jacinta) -> Molten(x)) -> therefore Molten(mommy) Molten(mommy) and forall x (Molten(x) -> Loathly(x)) -> therefore Loathly(mommy) Loathly(mommy) and Enthral(mommy, jacinta) and forall x (Loathly(x) and Enthral(x, jacinta) -> Disfavour(x, hamlen)) -> therefore Disfavour(mommy, hamlen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The nisse is primo. The nisse compel the ingunna. The nisse compel the noble. The nisse spondaise the noble. The ingunna is hemic. The ingunna is succulent. The ingunna compel the noble. The ingunna swoop the noble. The noble is primo. The noble is hemic. The noble spondaise the ingunna. The noble swoop the ingunna. If something is primo then it compel the noble. If something is primo and it compel the noble then it spondaise the nisse. If something compel the noble then the noble spondaise the ingunna. If something swoop the noble then it is larghetto. If something is larghetto then it is primo. If the ingunna spondaise the nisse and the nisse swoop the noble then the ingunna spondaise the noble. The ingunna does not need the nisse.", "logic": "\nPrimo(nisse)\nCompel(nisse, ingunna)\nCompel(nisse, noble)\nSpondaise(nisse, noble)\nHemic(ingunna)\nSucculent(ingunna)\nCompel(ingunna, noble)\nSwoop(ingunna, noble)\nPrimo(noble)\nHemic(noble)\nSpondaise(noble, ingunna)\nSwoop(noble, ingunna)\nforall x (Primo(x) -> Compel(x, noble))\nforall x (Primo(x) and Compel(x, noble) -> Spondaise(x, nisse))\nforall x (Compel(x, noble) -> Spondaise(noble, ingunna))\nforall x (Swoop(x, noble) -> Larghetto(x))\nforall x (Larghetto(x) -> Primo(x))\nSpondaise(ingunna, nisse) and Swoop(nisse, noble) -> Spondaise(ingunna, noble)\n\nnot Spondaise(ingunna, nisse)\n\nSwoop(ingunna, noble) and forall x (Swoop(x, noble) -> Larghetto(x)) -> therefore Larghetto(ingunna) Larghetto(ingunna) and forall x (Larghetto(x) -> Primo(x)) -> therefore Primo(ingunna) Primo(ingunna) and Compel(ingunna, noble) and forall x (Primo(x) and Compel(x, noble) -> Spondaise(x, nisse)) -> therefore Spondaise(ingunna, nisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The arlene is grave. The arlene metricise the aharon. The arlene metricise the britt. The arlene nigrify the britt. The aharon is trenchant. The aharon is stagey. The aharon metricise the britt. The aharon malversate the britt. The britt is grave. The britt is trenchant. The britt nigrify the aharon. The britt malversate the aharon. If something is grave then it metricise the britt. If something is grave and it metricise the britt then it nigrify the arlene. If something metricise the britt then the britt nigrify the aharon. If something malversate the britt then it is nestorian. If something is nestorian then it is grave. If the aharon nigrify the arlene and the arlene malversate the britt then the aharon nigrify the britt. The arlene is not nestorian.", "logic": "\nGrave(arlene)\nMetricise(arlene, aharon)\nMetricise(arlene, britt)\nNigrify(arlene, britt)\nTrenchant(aharon)\nStagey(aharon)\nMetricise(aharon, britt)\nMalversate(aharon, britt)\nGrave(britt)\nTrenchant(britt)\nNigrify(britt, aharon)\nMalversate(britt, aharon)\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Metricise(x, britt))\nforall x (Grave(x) and Metricise(x, britt) -> Nigrify(x, arlene))\nforall x (Metricise(x, britt) -> Nigrify(britt, aharon))\nforall x (Malversate(x, britt) -> Nestorian(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Grave(x))\nNigrify(aharon, arlene) and Malversate(arlene, britt) -> Nigrify(aharon, britt)\n\nnot Nestorian(arlene)\n\nforall x (Malversate(x, britt) -> Nestorian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The danyelle is rumbling. The danyelle claret the jacquelyn. The danyelle claret the aila. The danyelle noise the aila. The jacquelyn is chiseled. The jacquelyn is true. The jacquelyn claret the aila. The jacquelyn refine the aila. The aila is rumbling. The aila is chiseled. The aila noise the jacquelyn. The aila refine the jacquelyn. If something is rumbling then it claret the aila. If something is rumbling and it claret the aila then it noise the danyelle. If something claret the aila then the aila noise the jacquelyn. If something refine the aila then it is executed. If something is executed then it is rumbling. If the jacquelyn noise the danyelle and the danyelle refine the aila then the jacquelyn noise the aila. The aila is executed.", "logic": "\nRumbling(danyelle)\nClaret(danyelle, jacquelyn)\nClaret(danyelle, aila)\nNoise(danyelle, aila)\nChiseled(jacquelyn)\nTrue(jacquelyn)\nClaret(jacquelyn, aila)\nRefine(jacquelyn, aila)\nRumbling(aila)\nChiseled(aila)\nNoise(aila, jacquelyn)\nRefine(aila, jacquelyn)\nforall x (Rumbling(x) -> Claret(x, aila))\nforall x (Rumbling(x) and Claret(x, aila) -> Noise(x, danyelle))\nforall x (Claret(x, aila) -> Noise(aila, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Refine(x, aila) -> Executed(x))\nforall x (Executed(x) -> Rumbling(x))\nNoise(jacquelyn, danyelle) and Refine(danyelle, aila) -> Noise(jacquelyn, aila)\n\nExecuted(aila)\n\nforall x (Refine(x, aila) -> Executed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The rona is voluted. The rona assert the conni. The rona assert the korney. The rona remind the korney. The conni is gormless. The conni is lxxxiii. The conni assert the korney. The conni filiate the korney. The korney is voluted. The korney is gormless. The korney remind the conni. The korney filiate the conni. If something is voluted then it assert the korney. If something is voluted and it assert the korney then it remind the rona. If something assert the korney then the korney remind the conni. If something filiate the korney then it is sulfurous. If something is sulfurous then it is voluted. If the conni remind the rona and the rona filiate the korney then the conni remind the korney. The conni does not need the korney.", "logic": "\nVoluted(rona)\nAssert(rona, conni)\nAssert(rona, korney)\nRemind(rona, korney)\nGormless(conni)\nLxxxiii(conni)\nAssert(conni, korney)\nFiliate(conni, korney)\nVoluted(korney)\nGormless(korney)\nRemind(korney, conni)\nFiliate(korney, conni)\nforall x (Voluted(x) -> Assert(x, korney))\nforall x (Voluted(x) and Assert(x, korney) -> Remind(x, rona))\nforall x (Assert(x, korney) -> Remind(korney, conni))\nforall x (Filiate(x, korney) -> Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Voluted(x))\nRemind(conni, rona) and Filiate(rona, korney) -> Remind(conni, korney)\n\nnot Remind(conni, korney)\n\nRemind(conni, rona) and Filiate(rona, korney) -> Remind(conni, korney) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The corbin is pseudo. The corbin remain the pauli. The corbin remain the cherri. The corbin lance the cherri. The pauli is speechless. The pauli is observant. The pauli remain the cherri. The pauli resinate the cherri. The cherri is pseudo. The cherri is speechless. The cherri lance the pauli. The cherri resinate the pauli. If something is pseudo then it remain the cherri. If something is pseudo and it remain the cherri then it lance the corbin. If something remain the cherri then the cherri lance the pauli. If something resinate the cherri then it is ventral. If something is ventral then it is pseudo. If the pauli lance the corbin and the corbin resinate the cherri then the pauli lance the cherri. The corbin resinate the cherri.", "logic": "\nPseudo(corbin)\nRemain(corbin, pauli)\nRemain(corbin, cherri)\nLance(corbin, cherri)\nSpeechless(pauli)\nObservant(pauli)\nRemain(pauli, cherri)\nResinate(pauli, cherri)\nPseudo(cherri)\nSpeechless(cherri)\nLance(cherri, pauli)\nResinate(cherri, pauli)\nforall x (Pseudo(x) -> Remain(x, cherri))\nforall x (Pseudo(x) and Remain(x, cherri) -> Lance(x, corbin))\nforall x (Remain(x, cherri) -> Lance(cherri, pauli))\nforall x (Resinate(x, cherri) -> Ventral(x))\nforall x (Ventral(x) -> Pseudo(x))\nLance(pauli, corbin) and Resinate(corbin, cherri) -> Lance(pauli, cherri)\n\nResinate(corbin, cherri)\n\nResinate(corbin, cherri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The kellie is hypertonic. The kellie roil the bernadine. The kellie roil the dell. The kellie foxtrot the dell. The bernadine is lacy. The bernadine is accursed. The bernadine roil the dell. The bernadine procreate the dell. The dell is hypertonic. The dell is lacy. The dell foxtrot the bernadine. The dell procreate the bernadine. If something is hypertonic then it roil the dell. If something is hypertonic and it roil the dell then it foxtrot the kellie. If something roil the dell then the dell foxtrot the bernadine. If something procreate the dell then it is patented. If something is patented then it is hypertonic. If the bernadine foxtrot the kellie and the kellie procreate the dell then the bernadine foxtrot the dell. The bernadine does not like the bernadine.", "logic": "\nHypertonic(kellie)\nRoil(kellie, bernadine)\nRoil(kellie, dell)\nFoxtrot(kellie, dell)\nLacy(bernadine)\nAccursed(bernadine)\nRoil(bernadine, dell)\nProcreate(bernadine, dell)\nHypertonic(dell)\nLacy(dell)\nFoxtrot(dell, bernadine)\nProcreate(dell, bernadine)\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Roil(x, dell))\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) and Roil(x, dell) -> Foxtrot(x, kellie))\nforall x (Roil(x, dell) -> Foxtrot(dell, bernadine))\nforall x (Procreate(x, dell) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Hypertonic(x))\nFoxtrot(bernadine, kellie) and Procreate(kellie, dell) -> Foxtrot(bernadine, dell)\n\nnot Roil(bernadine, bernadine)\n\nnot Roil(bernadine, bernadine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The annamari is sessile. The annamari derail the wald. The annamari derail the donni. The annamari whang the donni. The wald is potted. The wald is ungraded. The wald derail the donni. The wald crisp the donni. The donni is sessile. The donni is potted. The donni whang the wald. The donni crisp the wald. If something is sessile then it derail the donni. If something is sessile and it derail the donni then it whang the annamari. If something derail the donni then the donni whang the wald. If something crisp the donni then it is petite. If something is petite then it is sessile. If the wald whang the annamari and the annamari crisp the donni then the wald whang the donni. The annamari crisp the wald.", "logic": "\nSessile(annamari)\nDerail(annamari, wald)\nDerail(annamari, donni)\nWhang(annamari, donni)\nPotted(wald)\nUngraded(wald)\nDerail(wald, donni)\nCrisp(wald, donni)\nSessile(donni)\nPotted(donni)\nWhang(donni, wald)\nCrisp(donni, wald)\nforall x (Sessile(x) -> Derail(x, donni))\nforall x (Sessile(x) and Derail(x, donni) -> Whang(x, annamari))\nforall x (Derail(x, donni) -> Whang(donni, wald))\nforall x (Crisp(x, donni) -> Petite(x))\nforall x (Petite(x) -> Sessile(x))\nWhang(wald, annamari) and Crisp(annamari, donni) -> Whang(wald, donni)\n\nCrisp(annamari, wald)\n\nCrisp(annamari, wald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The margo is sarcosomal. The margo find the ventura. The margo find the mercy. The margo bite the mercy. The ventura is modern. The ventura is conscious. The ventura find the mercy. The ventura wheel the mercy. The mercy is sarcosomal. The mercy is modern. The mercy bite the ventura. The mercy wheel the ventura. If something is sarcosomal then it find the mercy. If something is sarcosomal and it find the mercy then it bite the margo. If something find the mercy then the mercy bite the ventura. If something wheel the mercy then it is squared. If something is squared then it is sarcosomal. If the ventura bite the margo and the margo wheel the mercy then the ventura bite the mercy. The ventura does not like the margo.", "logic": "\nSarcosomal(margo)\nFind(margo, ventura)\nFind(margo, mercy)\nBite(margo, mercy)\nModern(ventura)\nConscious(ventura)\nFind(ventura, mercy)\nWheel(ventura, mercy)\nSarcosomal(mercy)\nModern(mercy)\nBite(mercy, ventura)\nWheel(mercy, ventura)\nforall x (Sarcosomal(x) -> Find(x, mercy))\nforall x (Sarcosomal(x) and Find(x, mercy) -> Bite(x, margo))\nforall x (Find(x, mercy) -> Bite(mercy, ventura))\nforall x (Wheel(x, mercy) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Sarcosomal(x))\nBite(ventura, margo) and Wheel(margo, mercy) -> Bite(ventura, mercy)\n\nnot Find(ventura, margo)\n\nnot Find(ventura, margo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The ravil is curving. The ravil pitchfork the wain. The ravil pitchfork the agnella. The ravil grave the agnella. The wain is pulverised. The wain is obstetric. The wain pitchfork the agnella. The wain quench the agnella. The agnella is curving. The agnella is pulverised. The agnella grave the wain. The agnella quench the wain. If something is curving then it pitchfork the agnella. If something is curving and it pitchfork the agnella then it grave the ravil. If something pitchfork the agnella then the agnella grave the wain. If something quench the agnella then it is equine. If something is equine then it is curving. If the wain grave the ravil and the ravil quench the agnella then the wain grave the agnella. The agnella grave the agnella.", "logic": "\nCurving(ravil)\nPitchfork(ravil, wain)\nPitchfork(ravil, agnella)\nGrave(ravil, agnella)\nPulverised(wain)\nObstetric(wain)\nPitchfork(wain, agnella)\nQuench(wain, agnella)\nCurving(agnella)\nPulverised(agnella)\nGrave(agnella, wain)\nQuench(agnella, wain)\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Pitchfork(x, agnella))\nforall x (Curving(x) and Pitchfork(x, agnella) -> Grave(x, ravil))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, agnella) -> Grave(agnella, wain))\nforall x (Quench(x, agnella) -> Equine(x))\nforall x (Equine(x) -> Curving(x))\nGrave(wain, ravil) and Quench(ravil, agnella) -> Grave(wain, agnella)\n\nGrave(agnella, agnella)\n\nGrave(agnella, agnella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "Augustus is conjugated. Polly is mucky. If something is conjugated then it is affixial. If Augustus is bitty and Augustus is not conjugated then Augustus is not affixial. Red, bitty things are succinct. Smart, bitty things are not succinct. If Augustus is affixial then Augustus is bitty. If Augustus is conjugated and Augustus is not succinct then Augustus is midweekly. Augustus is conjugated.", "logic": "\nConjugated(augustus)\nMucky(polly)\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Affixial(x))\nBitty(augustus) and not Conjugated(augustus) -> not Affixial(augustus)\nforall x (Mucky(x) and Bitty(x) -> Succinct(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Bitty(x) -> not Succinct(x))\nAffixial(augustus) -> Bitty(augustus)\nConjugated(augustus) and not Succinct(augustus) -> Midweekly(augustus)\n\nConjugated(augustus)\n\ntherefore Conjugated(augustus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Eddy is exalting. Shannen is cogitative. If something is exalting then it is adventive. If Eddy is hesperian and Eddy is not exalting then Eddy is not adventive. Red, hesperian things are anticancer. Smart, hesperian things are not anticancer. If Eddy is adventive then Eddy is hesperian. If Eddy is exalting and Eddy is not anticancer then Eddy is haemic. Shannen is not cogitative.", "logic": "\nExalting(eddy)\nCogitative(shannen)\nforall x (Exalting(x) -> Adventive(x))\nHesperian(eddy) and not Exalting(eddy) -> not Adventive(eddy)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) and Hesperian(x) -> Anticancer(x))\nforall x (Exalting(x) and Hesperian(x) -> not Anticancer(x))\nAdventive(eddy) -> Hesperian(eddy)\nExalting(eddy) and not Anticancer(eddy) -> Haemic(eddy)\n\nnot Cogitative(shannen)\n\ntherefore Cogitative(shannen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Osborn is attainable. Lina is vaporized. If something is attainable then it is dateable. If Osborn is preventive and Osborn is not attainable then Osborn is not dateable. Red, preventive things are frank. Smart, preventive things are not frank. If Osborn is dateable then Osborn is preventive. If Osborn is attainable and Osborn is not frank then Osborn is oversexed. Osborn is dateable.", "logic": "\nAttainable(osborn)\nVaporized(lina)\nforall x (Attainable(x) -> Dateable(x))\nPreventive(osborn) and not Attainable(osborn) -> not Dateable(osborn)\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and Preventive(x) -> Frank(x))\nforall x (Attainable(x) and Preventive(x) -> not Frank(x))\nDateable(osborn) -> Preventive(osborn)\nAttainable(osborn) and not Frank(osborn) -> Oversexed(osborn)\n\nDateable(osborn)\n\nAttainable(osborn) and forall x (Attainable(x) -> Dateable(x)) -> therefore Dateable(osborn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Margarete is dwindling. Guido is windy. If something is dwindling then it is scentless. If Margarete is iberian and Margarete is not dwindling then Margarete is not scentless. Red, iberian things are clogged. Smart, iberian things are not clogged. If Margarete is scentless then Margarete is iberian. If Margarete is dwindling and Margarete is not clogged then Margarete is seething. Margarete is not scentless.", "logic": "\nDwindling(margarete)\nWindy(guido)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> Scentless(x))\nIberian(margarete) and not Dwindling(margarete) -> not Scentless(margarete)\nforall x (Windy(x) and Iberian(x) -> Clogged(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Iberian(x) -> not Clogged(x))\nScentless(margarete) -> Iberian(margarete)\nDwindling(margarete) and not Clogged(margarete) -> Seething(margarete)\n\nnot Scentless(margarete)\n\nDwindling(margarete) and forall x (Dwindling(x) -> Scentless(x)) -> therefore Scentless(margarete)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Jourdan is dismaying. Lynda is observable. If something is dismaying then it is present. If Jourdan is adjuratory and Jourdan is not dismaying then Jourdan is not present. Red, adjuratory things are absent. Smart, adjuratory things are not absent. If Jourdan is present then Jourdan is adjuratory. If Jourdan is dismaying and Jourdan is not absent then Jourdan is snowy. Jourdan is adjuratory.", "logic": "\nDismaying(jourdan)\nObservable(lynda)\nforall x (Dismaying(x) -> Present(x))\nAdjuratory(jourdan) and not Dismaying(jourdan) -> not Present(jourdan)\nforall x (Observable(x) and Adjuratory(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Dismaying(x) and Adjuratory(x) -> not Absent(x))\nPresent(jourdan) -> Adjuratory(jourdan)\nDismaying(jourdan) and not Absent(jourdan) -> Snowy(jourdan)\n\nAdjuratory(jourdan)\n\nDismaying(jourdan) and forall x (Dismaying(x) -> Present(x)) -> therefore Present(jourdan) Present(jourdan) and Present(jourdan) -> Adjuratory(jourdan) -> therefore Adjuratory(jourdan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Barrie is adducent. Amadeus is clarifying. If something is adducent then it is matt. If Barrie is monogynous and Barrie is not adducent then Barrie is not matt. Red, monogynous things are deserved. Smart, monogynous things are not deserved. If Barrie is matt then Barrie is monogynous. If Barrie is adducent and Barrie is not deserved then Barrie is plastic. Barrie is not monogynous.", "logic": "\nAdducent(barrie)\nClarifying(amadeus)\nforall x (Adducent(x) -> Matt(x))\nMonogynous(barrie) and not Adducent(barrie) -> not Matt(barrie)\nforall x (Clarifying(x) and Monogynous(x) -> Deserved(x))\nforall x (Adducent(x) and Monogynous(x) -> not Deserved(x))\nMatt(barrie) -> Monogynous(barrie)\nAdducent(barrie) and not Deserved(barrie) -> Plastic(barrie)\n\nnot Monogynous(barrie)\n\nAdducent(barrie) and forall x (Adducent(x) -> Matt(x)) -> therefore Matt(barrie) Matt(barrie) and Matt(barrie) -> Monogynous(barrie) -> therefore Monogynous(barrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Ulrich is coincident. Janella is profane. If something is coincident then it is ostensible. If Ulrich is unvarying and Ulrich is not coincident then Ulrich is not ostensible. Red, unvarying things are anorectal. Smart, unvarying things are not anorectal. If Ulrich is ostensible then Ulrich is unvarying. If Ulrich is coincident and Ulrich is not anorectal then Ulrich is damning. Ulrich is not anorectal.", "logic": "\nCoincident(ulrich)\nProfane(janella)\nforall x (Coincident(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nUnvarying(ulrich) and not Coincident(ulrich) -> not Ostensible(ulrich)\nforall x (Profane(x) and Unvarying(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Coincident(x) and Unvarying(x) -> not Anorectal(x))\nOstensible(ulrich) -> Unvarying(ulrich)\nCoincident(ulrich) and not Anorectal(ulrich) -> Damning(ulrich)\n\nnot Anorectal(ulrich)\n\nCoincident(ulrich) and forall x (Coincident(x) -> Ostensible(x)) -> therefore Ostensible(ulrich) Ostensible(ulrich) and Ostensible(ulrich) -> Unvarying(ulrich) -> therefore Unvarying(ulrich) Coincident(ulrich) and Unvarying(ulrich) and forall x (Coincident(x) and Unvarying(x) -> not Anorectal(x)) -> therefore not Anorectal(ulrich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Selena is useful. Hedwig is erect. If something is useful then it is effluent. If Selena is eldritch and Selena is not useful then Selena is not effluent. Red, eldritch things are sightly. Smart, eldritch things are not sightly. If Selena is effluent then Selena is eldritch. If Selena is useful and Selena is not sightly then Selena is eucaryotic. Selena is sightly.", "logic": "\nUseful(selena)\nErect(hedwig)\nforall x (Useful(x) -> Effluent(x))\nEldritch(selena) and not Useful(selena) -> not Effluent(selena)\nforall x (Erect(x) and Eldritch(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Useful(x) and Eldritch(x) -> not Sightly(x))\nEffluent(selena) -> Eldritch(selena)\nUseful(selena) and not Sightly(selena) -> Eucaryotic(selena)\n\nSightly(selena)\n\nUseful(selena) and forall x (Useful(x) -> Effluent(x)) -> therefore Effluent(selena) Effluent(selena) and Effluent(selena) -> Eldritch(selena) -> therefore Eldritch(selena) Useful(selena) and Eldritch(selena) and forall x (Useful(x) and Eldritch(x) -> not Sightly(x)) -> therefore not Sightly(selena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Kaster is nazarene. Cristi is splitting. If something is nazarene then it is semiformal. If Kaster is joyous and Kaster is not nazarene then Kaster is not semiformal. Red, joyous things are inordinate. Smart, joyous things are not inordinate. If Kaster is semiformal then Kaster is joyous. If Kaster is nazarene and Kaster is not inordinate then Kaster is appalled. Cristi is not inordinate.", "logic": "\nNazarene(kaster)\nSplitting(cristi)\nforall x (Nazarene(x) -> Semiformal(x))\nJoyous(kaster) and not Nazarene(kaster) -> not Semiformal(kaster)\nforall x (Splitting(x) and Joyous(x) -> Inordinate(x))\nforall x (Nazarene(x) and Joyous(x) -> not Inordinate(x))\nSemiformal(kaster) -> Joyous(kaster)\nNazarene(kaster) and not Inordinate(kaster) -> Appalled(kaster)\n\nnot Inordinate(cristi)\n\nforall x (Splitting(x) and Joyous(x) -> Inordinate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Gussy is tubed. Arvy is roasted. If something is tubed then it is winded. If Gussy is subjacent and Gussy is not tubed then Gussy is not winded. Red, subjacent things are champion. Smart, subjacent things are not champion. If Gussy is winded then Gussy is subjacent. If Gussy is tubed and Gussy is not champion then Gussy is another. Arvy is winded.", "logic": "\nTubed(gussy)\nRoasted(arvy)\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Winded(x))\nSubjacent(gussy) and not Tubed(gussy) -> not Winded(gussy)\nforall x (Roasted(x) and Subjacent(x) -> Champion(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) and Subjacent(x) -> not Champion(x))\nWinded(gussy) -> Subjacent(gussy)\nTubed(gussy) and not Champion(gussy) -> Another(gussy)\n\nWinded(arvy)\n\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Winded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Xaviera is middlemost. Giffard is empathetic. If something is middlemost then it is zygodactyl. If Xaviera is wide and Xaviera is not middlemost then Xaviera is not zygodactyl. Red, wide things are undivided. Smart, wide things are not undivided. If Xaviera is zygodactyl then Xaviera is wide. If Xaviera is middlemost and Xaviera is not undivided then Xaviera is cultivated. Giffard is not cultivated.", "logic": "\nMiddlemost(xaviera)\nEmpathetic(giffard)\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Zygodactyl(x))\nWide(xaviera) and not Middlemost(xaviera) -> not Zygodactyl(xaviera)\nforall x (Empathetic(x) and Wide(x) -> Undivided(x))\nforall x (Middlemost(x) and Wide(x) -> not Undivided(x))\nZygodactyl(xaviera) -> Wide(xaviera)\nMiddlemost(xaviera) and not Undivided(xaviera) -> Cultivated(xaviera)\n\nnot Cultivated(giffard)\n\nnot Cultivated(giffard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Paddy is financial. Devinne is lxxxviii. If something is financial then it is stumpy. If Paddy is bimodal and Paddy is not financial then Paddy is not stumpy. Red, bimodal things are raucous. Smart, bimodal things are not raucous. If Paddy is stumpy then Paddy is bimodal. If Paddy is financial and Paddy is not raucous then Paddy is uncritical. Devinne is financial.", "logic": "\nFinancial(paddy)\nLxxxviii(devinne)\nforall x (Financial(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nBimodal(paddy) and not Financial(paddy) -> not Stumpy(paddy)\nforall x (Lxxxviii(x) and Bimodal(x) -> Raucous(x))\nforall x (Financial(x) and Bimodal(x) -> not Raucous(x))\nStumpy(paddy) -> Bimodal(paddy)\nFinancial(paddy) and not Raucous(paddy) -> Uncritical(paddy)\n\nFinancial(devinne)\n\nFinancial(devinne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Derick is corrupted. Nidia is sterilized. If something is corrupted then it is bridal. If Derick is calceolate and Derick is not corrupted then Derick is not bridal. Red, calceolate things are ongoing. Smart, calceolate things are not ongoing. If Derick is bridal then Derick is calceolate. If Derick is corrupted and Derick is not ongoing then Derick is pallid. Derick is not nice.", "logic": "\nCorrupted(derick)\nSterilized(nidia)\nforall x (Corrupted(x) -> Bridal(x))\nCalceolate(derick) and not Corrupted(derick) -> not Bridal(derick)\nforall x (Sterilized(x) and Calceolate(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Corrupted(x) and Calceolate(x) -> not Ongoing(x))\nBridal(derick) -> Calceolate(derick)\nCorrupted(derick) and not Ongoing(derick) -> Pallid(derick)\n\nnot Nice(derick)\n\nnot Nice(derick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Astra is collegiate. Dawson is synoicous. If something is collegiate then it is indirect. If Astra is monoecious and Astra is not collegiate then Astra is not indirect. Red, monoecious things are vehicular. Smart, monoecious things are not vehicular. If Astra is indirect then Astra is monoecious. If Astra is collegiate and Astra is not vehicular then Astra is pouchlike. Dawson is monoecious.", "logic": "\nCollegiate(astra)\nSynoicous(dawson)\nforall x (Collegiate(x) -> Indirect(x))\nMonoecious(astra) and not Collegiate(astra) -> not Indirect(astra)\nforall x (Synoicous(x) and Monoecious(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Collegiate(x) and Monoecious(x) -> not Vehicular(x))\nIndirect(astra) -> Monoecious(astra)\nCollegiate(astra) and not Vehicular(astra) -> Pouchlike(astra)\n\nMonoecious(dawson)\n\nMonoecious(dawson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Lenard is rickety. Hadrian is screwy. If something is rickety then it is eugenic. If Lenard is fourfold and Lenard is not rickety then Lenard is not eugenic. Red, fourfold things are broody. Smart, fourfold things are not broody. If Lenard is eugenic then Lenard is fourfold. If Lenard is rickety and Lenard is not broody then Lenard is screwy. Lenard is not screwy.", "logic": "\nRickety(lenard)\nScrewy(hadrian)\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> Eugenic(x))\nFourfold(lenard) and not Rickety(lenard) -> not Eugenic(lenard)\nforall x (Screwy(x) and Fourfold(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Rickety(x) and Fourfold(x) -> not Broody(x))\nEugenic(lenard) -> Fourfold(lenard)\nRickety(lenard) and not Broody(lenard) -> Screwy(lenard)\n\nnot Screwy(lenard)\n\nnot Screwy(lenard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Ronnica is insured. Ilsa is beakless. If something is insured then it is chaotic. If Ronnica is devoted and Ronnica is not insured then Ronnica is not chaotic. Red, devoted things are brotherly. Smart, devoted things are not brotherly. If Ronnica is chaotic then Ronnica is devoted. If Ronnica is insured and Ronnica is not brotherly then Ronnica is centroidal. Ilsa is nice.", "logic": "\nInsured(ronnica)\nBeakless(ilsa)\nforall x (Insured(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nDevoted(ronnica) and not Insured(ronnica) -> not Chaotic(ronnica)\nforall x (Beakless(x) and Devoted(x) -> Brotherly(x))\nforall x (Insured(x) and Devoted(x) -> not Brotherly(x))\nChaotic(ronnica) -> Devoted(ronnica)\nInsured(ronnica) and not Brotherly(ronnica) -> Centroidal(ronnica)\n\nNice(ilsa)\n\nNice(ilsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "The barth acquit the marieann. The juli dispread the twila. The marieann is roaring. The twila dispread the marieann. If something dispread the marieann then it is tasty. If something dispread the twila and the twila syllabise the marieann then it is tasty. If something dispread the juli then it dispread the marieann. If something is roaring then it acquit the juli. If something acquit the marieann then it dispread the juli. If something acquit the marieann then the marieann is tasty. If something acquit the twila then the twila is doubled. If something acquit the barth then it syllabise the marieann. The twila dispread the marieann.", "logic": "\nAcquit(barth, marieann)\nDispread(juli, twila)\nRoaring(marieann)\nDispread(twila, marieann)\nforall x (Dispread(x, marieann) -> Tasty(x))\nforall x (Dispread(x, twila) and Syllabise(twila, marieann) -> Tasty(x))\nforall x (Dispread(x, juli) -> Dispread(x, marieann))\nforall x (Roaring(x) -> Acquit(x, juli))\nforall x (Acquit(x, marieann) -> Dispread(x, juli))\nforall x (Acquit(x, marieann) -> Tasty(marieann))\nforall x (Acquit(x, twila) -> Doubled(twila))\nforall x (Acquit(x, barth) -> Syllabise(x, marieann))\n\nDispread(twila, marieann)\n\ntherefore Dispread(twila, marieann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The vivienne colly the drake. The woochang galvanize the pamelina. The drake is defensive. The pamelina galvanize the drake. If something galvanize the drake then it is mazed. If something galvanize the pamelina and the pamelina enlace the drake then it is mazed. If something galvanize the woochang then it galvanize the drake. If something is defensive then it colly the woochang. If something colly the drake then it galvanize the woochang. If something colly the drake then the drake is mazed. If something colly the pamelina then the pamelina is cuboidal. If something colly the vivienne then it enlace the drake. The pamelina does not like the drake.", "logic": "\nColly(vivienne, drake)\nGalvanize(woochang, pamelina)\nDefensive(drake)\nGalvanize(pamelina, drake)\nforall x (Galvanize(x, drake) -> Mazed(x))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, pamelina) and Enlace(pamelina, drake) -> Mazed(x))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, woochang) -> Galvanize(x, drake))\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Colly(x, woochang))\nforall x (Colly(x, drake) -> Galvanize(x, woochang))\nforall x (Colly(x, drake) -> Mazed(drake))\nforall x (Colly(x, pamelina) -> Cuboidal(pamelina))\nforall x (Colly(x, vivienne) -> Enlace(x, drake))\n\nnot Galvanize(pamelina, drake)\n\ntherefore Galvanize(pamelina, drake)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The jewelle grunt the tiffi. The nickolas fulfill the deanne. The tiffi is rawboned. The deanne fulfill the tiffi. If something fulfill the tiffi then it is cyrillic. If something fulfill the deanne and the deanne true the tiffi then it is cyrillic. If something fulfill the nickolas then it fulfill the tiffi. If something is rawboned then it grunt the nickolas. If something grunt the tiffi then it fulfill the nickolas. If something grunt the tiffi then the tiffi is cyrillic. If something grunt the deanne then the deanne is tottery. If something grunt the jewelle then it true the tiffi. The jewelle fulfill the nickolas.", "logic": "\nGrunt(jewelle, tiffi)\nFulfill(nickolas, deanne)\nRawboned(tiffi)\nFulfill(deanne, tiffi)\nforall x (Fulfill(x, tiffi) -> Cyrillic(x))\nforall x (Fulfill(x, deanne) and True(deanne, tiffi) -> Cyrillic(x))\nforall x (Fulfill(x, nickolas) -> Fulfill(x, tiffi))\nforall x (Rawboned(x) -> Grunt(x, nickolas))\nforall x (Grunt(x, tiffi) -> Fulfill(x, nickolas))\nforall x (Grunt(x, tiffi) -> Cyrillic(tiffi))\nforall x (Grunt(x, deanne) -> Tottery(deanne))\nforall x (Grunt(x, jewelle) -> True(x, tiffi))\n\nFulfill(jewelle, nickolas)\n\nGrunt(jewelle, tiffi) and forall x (Grunt(x, tiffi) -> Fulfill(x, nickolas)) -> therefore Fulfill(jewelle, nickolas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The lulita weekend the luise. The lilias shoulder the quintana. The luise is detachable. The quintana shoulder the luise. If something shoulder the luise then it is whopping. If something shoulder the quintana and the quintana uniformize the luise then it is whopping. If something shoulder the lilias then it shoulder the luise. If something is detachable then it weekend the lilias. If something weekend the luise then it shoulder the lilias. If something weekend the luise then the luise is whopping. If something weekend the quintana then the quintana is rank. If something weekend the lulita then it uniformize the luise. The quintana is not whopping.", "logic": "\nWeekend(lulita, luise)\nShoulder(lilias, quintana)\nDetachable(luise)\nShoulder(quintana, luise)\nforall x (Shoulder(x, luise) -> Whopping(x))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, quintana) and Uniformize(quintana, luise) -> Whopping(x))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, lilias) -> Shoulder(x, luise))\nforall x (Detachable(x) -> Weekend(x, lilias))\nforall x (Weekend(x, luise) -> Shoulder(x, lilias))\nforall x (Weekend(x, luise) -> Whopping(luise))\nforall x (Weekend(x, quintana) -> Rank(quintana))\nforall x (Weekend(x, lulita) -> Uniformize(x, luise))\n\nnot Whopping(quintana)\n\nShoulder(quintana, luise) and forall x (Shoulder(x, luise) -> Whopping(x)) -> therefore Whopping(quintana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The brandi spangle the madella. The agata retaliate the ami. The madella is treed. The ami retaliate the madella. If something retaliate the madella then it is unswept. If something retaliate the ami and the ami concertize the madella then it is unswept. If something retaliate the agata then it retaliate the madella. If something is treed then it spangle the agata. If something spangle the madella then it retaliate the agata. If something spangle the madella then the madella is unswept. If something spangle the ami then the ami is actinic. If something spangle the brandi then it concertize the madella. The brandi retaliate the madella.", "logic": "\nSpangle(brandi, madella)\nRetaliate(agata, ami)\nTreed(madella)\nRetaliate(ami, madella)\nforall x (Retaliate(x, madella) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Retaliate(x, ami) and Concertize(ami, madella) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Retaliate(x, agata) -> Retaliate(x, madella))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> Spangle(x, agata))\nforall x (Spangle(x, madella) -> Retaliate(x, agata))\nforall x (Spangle(x, madella) -> Unswept(madella))\nforall x (Spangle(x, ami) -> Actinic(ami))\nforall x (Spangle(x, brandi) -> Concertize(x, madella))\n\nRetaliate(brandi, madella)\n\nSpangle(brandi, madella) and forall x (Spangle(x, madella) -> Retaliate(x, agata)) -> therefore Retaliate(brandi, agata) Retaliate(brandi, agata) and forall x (Retaliate(x, agata) -> Retaliate(x, madella)) -> therefore Retaliate(brandi, madella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The bill measure the jeanette. The aurlie afflict the ainslie. The jeanette is gladdened. The ainslie afflict the jeanette. If something afflict the jeanette then it is slushy. If something afflict the ainslie and the ainslie prejudice the jeanette then it is slushy. If something afflict the aurlie then it afflict the jeanette. If something is gladdened then it measure the aurlie. If something measure the jeanette then it afflict the aurlie. If something measure the jeanette then the jeanette is slushy. If something measure the ainslie then the ainslie is shouldered. If something measure the bill then it prejudice the jeanette. The bill does not like the jeanette.", "logic": "\nMeasure(bill, jeanette)\nAfflict(aurlie, ainslie)\nGladdened(jeanette)\nAfflict(ainslie, jeanette)\nforall x (Afflict(x, jeanette) -> Slushy(x))\nforall x (Afflict(x, ainslie) and Prejudice(ainslie, jeanette) -> Slushy(x))\nforall x (Afflict(x, aurlie) -> Afflict(x, jeanette))\nforall x (Gladdened(x) -> Measure(x, aurlie))\nforall x (Measure(x, jeanette) -> Afflict(x, aurlie))\nforall x (Measure(x, jeanette) -> Slushy(jeanette))\nforall x (Measure(x, ainslie) -> Shouldered(ainslie))\nforall x (Measure(x, bill) -> Prejudice(x, jeanette))\n\nnot Afflict(bill, jeanette)\n\nMeasure(bill, jeanette) and forall x (Measure(x, jeanette) -> Afflict(x, aurlie)) -> therefore Afflict(bill, aurlie) Afflict(bill, aurlie) and forall x (Afflict(x, aurlie) -> Afflict(x, jeanette)) -> therefore Afflict(bill, jeanette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The dareen slue the nolan. The deirdre stake the delia. The nolan is applicable. The delia stake the nolan. If something stake the nolan then it is sumptuary. If something stake the delia and the delia balk the nolan then it is sumptuary. If something stake the deirdre then it stake the nolan. If something is applicable then it slue the deirdre. If something slue the nolan then it stake the deirdre. If something slue the nolan then the nolan is sumptuary. If something slue the delia then the delia is fattish. If something slue the dareen then it balk the nolan. The dareen is sumptuary.", "logic": "\nSlue(dareen, nolan)\nStake(deirdre, delia)\nApplicable(nolan)\nStake(delia, nolan)\nforall x (Stake(x, nolan) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Stake(x, delia) and Balk(delia, nolan) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Stake(x, deirdre) -> Stake(x, nolan))\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Slue(x, deirdre))\nforall x (Slue(x, nolan) -> Stake(x, deirdre))\nforall x (Slue(x, nolan) -> Sumptuary(nolan))\nforall x (Slue(x, delia) -> Fattish(delia))\nforall x (Slue(x, dareen) -> Balk(x, nolan))\n\nSumptuary(dareen)\n\nSlue(dareen, nolan) and forall x (Slue(x, nolan) -> Stake(x, deirdre)) -> therefore Stake(dareen, deirdre) Stake(dareen, deirdre) and forall x (Stake(x, deirdre) -> Stake(x, nolan)) -> therefore Stake(dareen, nolan) Stake(dareen, nolan) and forall x (Stake(x, nolan) -> Sumptuary(x)) -> therefore Sumptuary(dareen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The winnifred surprise the belinda. The herbert triplicate the wendie. The belinda is yucky. The wendie triplicate the belinda. If something triplicate the belinda then it is wedded. If something triplicate the wendie and the wendie retrograde the belinda then it is wedded. If something triplicate the herbert then it triplicate the belinda. If something is yucky then it surprise the herbert. If something surprise the belinda then it triplicate the herbert. If something surprise the belinda then the belinda is wedded. If something surprise the wendie then the wendie is freelance. If something surprise the winnifred then it retrograde the belinda. The winnifred is not wedded.", "logic": "\nSurprise(winnifred, belinda)\nTriplicate(herbert, wendie)\nYucky(belinda)\nTriplicate(wendie, belinda)\nforall x (Triplicate(x, belinda) -> Wedded(x))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, wendie) and Retrograde(wendie, belinda) -> Wedded(x))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, herbert) -> Triplicate(x, belinda))\nforall x (Yucky(x) -> Surprise(x, herbert))\nforall x (Surprise(x, belinda) -> Triplicate(x, herbert))\nforall x (Surprise(x, belinda) -> Wedded(belinda))\nforall x (Surprise(x, wendie) -> Freelance(wendie))\nforall x (Surprise(x, winnifred) -> Retrograde(x, belinda))\n\nnot Wedded(winnifred)\n\nSurprise(winnifred, belinda) and forall x (Surprise(x, belinda) -> Triplicate(x, herbert)) -> therefore Triplicate(winnifred, herbert) Triplicate(winnifred, herbert) and forall x (Triplicate(x, herbert) -> Triplicate(x, belinda)) -> therefore Triplicate(winnifred, belinda) Triplicate(winnifred, belinda) and forall x (Triplicate(x, belinda) -> Wedded(x)) -> therefore Wedded(winnifred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The dorella fiddle the fabian. The erinn wonder the olympie. The fabian is fumed. The olympie wonder the fabian. If something wonder the fabian then it is pukka. If something wonder the olympie and the olympie talk the fabian then it is pukka. If something wonder the erinn then it wonder the fabian. If something is fumed then it fiddle the erinn. If something fiddle the fabian then it wonder the erinn. If something fiddle the fabian then the fabian is pukka. If something fiddle the olympie then the olympie is ruthless. If something fiddle the dorella then it talk the fabian. The erinn is not pukka.", "logic": "\nFiddle(dorella, fabian)\nWonder(erinn, olympie)\nFumed(fabian)\nWonder(olympie, fabian)\nforall x (Wonder(x, fabian) -> Pukka(x))\nforall x (Wonder(x, olympie) and Talk(olympie, fabian) -> Pukka(x))\nforall x (Wonder(x, erinn) -> Wonder(x, fabian))\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Fiddle(x, erinn))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, fabian) -> Wonder(x, erinn))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, fabian) -> Pukka(fabian))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, olympie) -> Ruthless(olympie))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, dorella) -> Talk(x, fabian))\n\nnot Pukka(erinn)\n\nforall x (Wonder(x, fabian) -> Pukka(x)) <- forall x (Wonder(x, erinn) -> Wonder(x, fabian)) <- forall x (Fiddle(x, fabian) -> Wonder(x, erinn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The jared sovietize the vonni. The waring pound the eadith. The vonni is nutrient. The eadith pound the vonni. If something pound the vonni then it is pale. If something pound the eadith and the eadith sailplane the vonni then it is pale. If something pound the waring then it pound the vonni. If something is nutrient then it sovietize the waring. If something sovietize the vonni then it pound the waring. If something sovietize the vonni then the vonni is pale. If something sovietize the eadith then the eadith is etiologic. If something sovietize the jared then it sailplane the vonni. The eadith sovietize the waring.", "logic": "\nSovietize(jared, vonni)\nPound(waring, eadith)\nNutrient(vonni)\nPound(eadith, vonni)\nforall x (Pound(x, vonni) -> Pale(x))\nforall x (Pound(x, eadith) and Sailplane(eadith, vonni) -> Pale(x))\nforall x (Pound(x, waring) -> Pound(x, vonni))\nforall x (Nutrient(x) -> Sovietize(x, waring))\nforall x (Sovietize(x, vonni) -> Pound(x, waring))\nforall x (Sovietize(x, vonni) -> Pale(vonni))\nforall x (Sovietize(x, eadith) -> Etiologic(eadith))\nforall x (Sovietize(x, jared) -> Sailplane(x, vonni))\n\nSovietize(eadith, waring)\n\nforall x (Nutrient(x) -> Sovietize(x, waring)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The maurine crosshatch the gonzalo. The prue notice the erina. The gonzalo is dishy. The erina notice the gonzalo. If something notice the gonzalo then it is digressive. If something notice the erina and the erina infect the gonzalo then it is digressive. If something notice the prue then it notice the gonzalo. If something is dishy then it crosshatch the prue. If something crosshatch the gonzalo then it notice the prue. If something crosshatch the gonzalo then the gonzalo is digressive. If something crosshatch the erina then the erina is ajar. If something crosshatch the maurine then it infect the gonzalo. The maurine does not eat the gonzalo.", "logic": "\nCrosshatch(maurine, gonzalo)\nNotice(prue, erina)\nDishy(gonzalo)\nNotice(erina, gonzalo)\nforall x (Notice(x, gonzalo) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Notice(x, erina) and Infect(erina, gonzalo) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Notice(x, prue) -> Notice(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Dishy(x) -> Crosshatch(x, prue))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, gonzalo) -> Notice(x, prue))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, gonzalo) -> Digressive(gonzalo))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, erina) -> Ajar(erina))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, maurine) -> Infect(x, gonzalo))\n\nnot Infect(maurine, gonzalo)\n\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, maurine) -> Infect(x, gonzalo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The modestia suit the ricardo. The jaine miss the angus. The ricardo is maniclike. The angus miss the ricardo. If something miss the ricardo then it is madcap. If something miss the angus and the angus chalk the ricardo then it is madcap. If something miss the jaine then it miss the ricardo. If something is maniclike then it suit the jaine. If something suit the ricardo then it miss the jaine. If something suit the ricardo then the ricardo is madcap. If something suit the angus then the angus is stifled. If something suit the modestia then it chalk the ricardo. The ricardo miss the ricardo.", "logic": "\nSuit(modestia, ricardo)\nMiss(jaine, angus)\nManiclike(ricardo)\nMiss(angus, ricardo)\nforall x (Miss(x, ricardo) -> Madcap(x))\nforall x (Miss(x, angus) and Chalk(angus, ricardo) -> Madcap(x))\nforall x (Miss(x, jaine) -> Miss(x, ricardo))\nforall x (Maniclike(x) -> Suit(x, jaine))\nforall x (Suit(x, ricardo) -> Miss(x, jaine))\nforall x (Suit(x, ricardo) -> Madcap(ricardo))\nforall x (Suit(x, angus) -> Stifled(angus))\nforall x (Suit(x, modestia) -> Chalk(x, ricardo))\n\nMiss(ricardo, ricardo)\n\nforall x (Miss(x, jaine) -> Miss(x, ricardo)) <- forall x (Suit(x, ricardo) -> Miss(x, jaine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The garret acidulate the mercedes. The tarzan stunt the derron. The mercedes is viceregal. The derron stunt the mercedes. If something stunt the mercedes then it is erudite. If something stunt the derron and the derron souse the mercedes then it is erudite. If something stunt the tarzan then it stunt the mercedes. If something is viceregal then it acidulate the tarzan. If something acidulate the mercedes then it stunt the tarzan. If something acidulate the mercedes then the mercedes is erudite. If something acidulate the derron then the derron is corrupt. If something acidulate the garret then it souse the mercedes. The garret does not chase the derron.", "logic": "\nAcidulate(garret, mercedes)\nStunt(tarzan, derron)\nViceregal(mercedes)\nStunt(derron, mercedes)\nforall x (Stunt(x, mercedes) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Stunt(x, derron) and Souse(derron, mercedes) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Stunt(x, tarzan) -> Stunt(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) -> Acidulate(x, tarzan))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, mercedes) -> Stunt(x, tarzan))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, mercedes) -> Erudite(mercedes))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, derron) -> Corrupt(derron))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, garret) -> Souse(x, mercedes))\n\nnot Acidulate(garret, derron)\n\nnot Acidulate(garret, derron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The shellie battle the melinde. The camila portion the jaclin. The melinde is terrified. The jaclin portion the melinde. If something portion the melinde then it is clogged. If something portion the jaclin and the jaclin crenelate the melinde then it is clogged. If something portion the camila then it portion the melinde. If something is terrified then it battle the camila. If something battle the melinde then it portion the camila. If something battle the melinde then the melinde is clogged. If something battle the jaclin then the jaclin is aerophilic. If something battle the shellie then it crenelate the melinde. The shellie crenelate the shellie.", "logic": "\nBattle(shellie, melinde)\nPortion(camila, jaclin)\nTerrified(melinde)\nPortion(jaclin, melinde)\nforall x (Portion(x, melinde) -> Clogged(x))\nforall x (Portion(x, jaclin) and Crenelate(jaclin, melinde) -> Clogged(x))\nforall x (Portion(x, camila) -> Portion(x, melinde))\nforall x (Terrified(x) -> Battle(x, camila))\nforall x (Battle(x, melinde) -> Portion(x, camila))\nforall x (Battle(x, melinde) -> Clogged(melinde))\nforall x (Battle(x, jaclin) -> Aerophilic(jaclin))\nforall x (Battle(x, shellie) -> Crenelate(x, melinde))\n\nCrenelate(shellie, shellie)\n\nCrenelate(shellie, shellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The dore quarter the geoff. The ginnifer conflate the kira. The geoff is armenian. The kira conflate the geoff. If something conflate the geoff then it is toroidal. If something conflate the kira and the kira rasterize the geoff then it is toroidal. If something conflate the ginnifer then it conflate the geoff. If something is armenian then it quarter the ginnifer. If something quarter the geoff then it conflate the ginnifer. If something quarter the geoff then the geoff is toroidal. If something quarter the kira then the kira is addictive. If something quarter the dore then it rasterize the geoff. The geoff does not eat the dore.", "logic": "\nQuarter(dore, geoff)\nConflate(ginnifer, kira)\nArmenian(geoff)\nConflate(kira, geoff)\nforall x (Conflate(x, geoff) -> Toroidal(x))\nforall x (Conflate(x, kira) and Rasterize(kira, geoff) -> Toroidal(x))\nforall x (Conflate(x, ginnifer) -> Conflate(x, geoff))\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> Quarter(x, ginnifer))\nforall x (Quarter(x, geoff) -> Conflate(x, ginnifer))\nforall x (Quarter(x, geoff) -> Toroidal(geoff))\nforall x (Quarter(x, kira) -> Addictive(kira))\nforall x (Quarter(x, dore) -> Rasterize(x, geoff))\n\nnot Rasterize(geoff, dore)\n\nnot Rasterize(geoff, dore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The jeanna neaten the philly. The leonelle mothball the trula. The philly is agaze. The trula mothball the philly. If something mothball the philly then it is humourless. If something mothball the trula and the trula ricochet the philly then it is humourless. If something mothball the leonelle then it mothball the philly. If something is agaze then it neaten the leonelle. If something neaten the philly then it mothball the leonelle. If something neaten the philly then the philly is humourless. If something neaten the trula then the trula is prima. If something neaten the jeanna then it ricochet the philly. The philly is nice.", "logic": "\nNeaten(jeanna, philly)\nMothball(leonelle, trula)\nAgaze(philly)\nMothball(trula, philly)\nforall x (Mothball(x, philly) -> Humourless(x))\nforall x (Mothball(x, trula) and Ricochet(trula, philly) -> Humourless(x))\nforall x (Mothball(x, leonelle) -> Mothball(x, philly))\nforall x (Agaze(x) -> Neaten(x, leonelle))\nforall x (Neaten(x, philly) -> Mothball(x, leonelle))\nforall x (Neaten(x, philly) -> Humourless(philly))\nforall x (Neaten(x, trula) -> Prima(trula))\nforall x (Neaten(x, jeanna) -> Ricochet(x, philly))\n\nNice(philly)\n\nNice(philly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The karole brainwash the husein. The johann collapse the karole. The johann is shed. The johann brainwash the husein. The husein collapse the karole. The husein collapse the johann. The husein is shed. The husein is germanic. The husein dissertate the johann. The husein brainwash the johann. If someone collapse the husein then the husein is mortified. If someone collapse the karole then they visit the husein. If someone collapse the karole then they are linked. Kind, shed people are mortified. If someone dissertate the karole and they visit the husein then the husein collapse the johann. If someone is linked and they visit the husein then they chase the karole. If someone dissertate the husein and the husein collapse the karole then they do not visit the johann. If someone is mortified then they see the johann. The husein is shed.", "logic": "\nBrainwash(karole, husein)\nCollapse(johann, karole)\nShed(johann)\nBrainwash(johann, husein)\nCollapse(husein, karole)\nCollapse(husein, johann)\nShed(husein)\nGermanic(husein)\nDissertate(husein, johann)\nBrainwash(husein, johann)\nforall x (Collapse(x, husein) -> Mortified(husein))\nforall x (Collapse(x, karole) -> Brainwash(x, husein))\nforall x (Collapse(x, karole) -> Linked(x))\nforall x (Linked(x) and Shed(x) -> Mortified(x))\nforall x (Dissertate(x, karole) and Brainwash(x, husein) -> Collapse(husein, johann))\nforall x (Linked(x) and Brainwash(x, husein) -> Collapse(x, karole))\nforall x (Dissertate(x, husein) and Collapse(husein, karole) -> not Brainwash(x, johann))\nforall x (Mortified(x) -> Dissertate(x, johann))\n\nShed(husein)\n\ntherefore Shed(husein)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The bellanca mellow the rafa. The annelise choke the bellanca. The annelise is passant. The annelise mellow the rafa. The rafa choke the bellanca. The rafa choke the annelise. The rafa is passant. The rafa is afeard. The rafa slather the annelise. The rafa mellow the annelise. If someone choke the rafa then the rafa is pianistic. If someone choke the bellanca then they visit the rafa. If someone choke the bellanca then they are unspaced. Kind, passant people are pianistic. If someone slather the bellanca and they visit the rafa then the rafa choke the annelise. If someone is unspaced and they visit the rafa then they chase the bellanca. If someone slather the rafa and the rafa choke the bellanca then they do not visit the annelise. If someone is pianistic then they see the annelise. The rafa does not chase the annelise.", "logic": "\nMellow(bellanca, rafa)\nChoke(annelise, bellanca)\nPassant(annelise)\nMellow(annelise, rafa)\nChoke(rafa, bellanca)\nChoke(rafa, annelise)\nPassant(rafa)\nAfeard(rafa)\nSlather(rafa, annelise)\nMellow(rafa, annelise)\nforall x (Choke(x, rafa) -> Pianistic(rafa))\nforall x (Choke(x, bellanca) -> Mellow(x, rafa))\nforall x (Choke(x, bellanca) -> Unspaced(x))\nforall x (Unspaced(x) and Passant(x) -> Pianistic(x))\nforall x (Slather(x, bellanca) and Mellow(x, rafa) -> Choke(rafa, annelise))\nforall x (Unspaced(x) and Mellow(x, rafa) -> Choke(x, bellanca))\nforall x (Slather(x, rafa) and Choke(rafa, bellanca) -> not Mellow(x, annelise))\nforall x (Pianistic(x) -> Slather(x, annelise))\n\nnot Choke(rafa, annelise)\n\ntherefore Choke(rafa, annelise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The steffane regain the audrey. The padraig shudder the steffane. The padraig is ichorous. The padraig regain the audrey. The audrey shudder the steffane. The audrey shudder the padraig. The audrey is ichorous. The audrey is venereal. The audrey backhand the padraig. The audrey regain the padraig. If someone shudder the audrey then the audrey is colonized. If someone shudder the steffane then they visit the audrey. If someone shudder the steffane then they are unitary. Kind, ichorous people are colonized. If someone backhand the steffane and they visit the audrey then the audrey shudder the padraig. If someone is unitary and they visit the audrey then they chase the steffane. If someone backhand the audrey and the audrey shudder the steffane then they do not visit the padraig. If someone is colonized then they see the padraig. The padraig is unitary.", "logic": "\nRegain(steffane, audrey)\nShudder(padraig, steffane)\nIchorous(padraig)\nRegain(padraig, audrey)\nShudder(audrey, steffane)\nShudder(audrey, padraig)\nIchorous(audrey)\nVenereal(audrey)\nBackhand(audrey, padraig)\nRegain(audrey, padraig)\nforall x (Shudder(x, audrey) -> Colonized(audrey))\nforall x (Shudder(x, steffane) -> Regain(x, audrey))\nforall x (Shudder(x, steffane) -> Unitary(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) and Ichorous(x) -> Colonized(x))\nforall x (Backhand(x, steffane) and Regain(x, audrey) -> Shudder(audrey, padraig))\nforall x (Unitary(x) and Regain(x, audrey) -> Shudder(x, steffane))\nforall x (Backhand(x, audrey) and Shudder(audrey, steffane) -> not Regain(x, padraig))\nforall x (Colonized(x) -> Backhand(x, padraig))\n\nUnitary(padraig)\n\nShudder(padraig, steffane) and forall x (Shudder(x, steffane) -> Unitary(x)) -> therefore Unitary(padraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The nonah reproof the ellyn. The sibbie depopulate the nonah. The sibbie is autonomous. The sibbie reproof the ellyn. The ellyn depopulate the nonah. The ellyn depopulate the sibbie. The ellyn is autonomous. The ellyn is endemic. The ellyn fake the sibbie. The ellyn reproof the sibbie. If someone depopulate the ellyn then the ellyn is precast. If someone depopulate the nonah then they visit the ellyn. If someone depopulate the nonah then they are enceinte. Kind, autonomous people are precast. If someone fake the nonah and they visit the ellyn then the ellyn depopulate the sibbie. If someone is enceinte and they visit the ellyn then they chase the nonah. If someone fake the ellyn and the ellyn depopulate the nonah then they do not visit the sibbie. If someone is precast then they see the sibbie. The ellyn does not visit the ellyn.", "logic": "\nReproof(nonah, ellyn)\nDepopulate(sibbie, nonah)\nAutonomous(sibbie)\nReproof(sibbie, ellyn)\nDepopulate(ellyn, nonah)\nDepopulate(ellyn, sibbie)\nAutonomous(ellyn)\nEndemic(ellyn)\nFake(ellyn, sibbie)\nReproof(ellyn, sibbie)\nforall x (Depopulate(x, ellyn) -> Precast(ellyn))\nforall x (Depopulate(x, nonah) -> Reproof(x, ellyn))\nforall x (Depopulate(x, nonah) -> Enceinte(x))\nforall x (Enceinte(x) and Autonomous(x) -> Precast(x))\nforall x (Fake(x, nonah) and Reproof(x, ellyn) -> Depopulate(ellyn, sibbie))\nforall x (Enceinte(x) and Reproof(x, ellyn) -> Depopulate(x, nonah))\nforall x (Fake(x, ellyn) and Depopulate(ellyn, nonah) -> not Reproof(x, sibbie))\nforall x (Precast(x) -> Fake(x, sibbie))\n\nnot Reproof(ellyn, ellyn)\n\nDepopulate(ellyn, nonah) and forall x (Depopulate(x, nonah) -> Reproof(x, ellyn)) -> therefore Reproof(ellyn, ellyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The aina balk the huey. The geraldine overstress the aina. The geraldine is pupal. The geraldine balk the huey. The huey overstress the aina. The huey overstress the geraldine. The huey is pupal. The huey is lachrymose. The huey pant the geraldine. The huey balk the geraldine. If someone overstress the huey then the huey is prepacked. If someone overstress the aina then they visit the huey. If someone overstress the aina then they are bittie. Kind, pupal people are prepacked. If someone pant the aina and they visit the huey then the huey overstress the geraldine. If someone is bittie and they visit the huey then they chase the aina. If someone pant the huey and the huey overstress the aina then they do not visit the geraldine. If someone is prepacked then they see the geraldine. The geraldine is prepacked.", "logic": "\nBalk(aina, huey)\nOverstress(geraldine, aina)\nPupal(geraldine)\nBalk(geraldine, huey)\nOverstress(huey, aina)\nOverstress(huey, geraldine)\nPupal(huey)\nLachrymose(huey)\nPant(huey, geraldine)\nBalk(huey, geraldine)\nforall x (Overstress(x, huey) -> Prepacked(huey))\nforall x (Overstress(x, aina) -> Balk(x, huey))\nforall x (Overstress(x, aina) -> Bittie(x))\nforall x (Bittie(x) and Pupal(x) -> Prepacked(x))\nforall x (Pant(x, aina) and Balk(x, huey) -> Overstress(huey, geraldine))\nforall x (Bittie(x) and Balk(x, huey) -> Overstress(x, aina))\nforall x (Pant(x, huey) and Overstress(huey, aina) -> not Balk(x, geraldine))\nforall x (Prepacked(x) -> Pant(x, geraldine))\n\nPrepacked(geraldine)\n\nOverstress(geraldine, aina) and forall x (Overstress(x, aina) -> Bittie(x)) -> therefore Bittie(geraldine) Bittie(geraldine) and Pupal(geraldine) and forall x (Bittie(x) and Pupal(x) -> Prepacked(x)) -> therefore Prepacked(geraldine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The eliot flatten the lyndel. The timothea dissemble the eliot. The timothea is edifying. The timothea flatten the lyndel. The lyndel dissemble the eliot. The lyndel dissemble the timothea. The lyndel is edifying. The lyndel is plundering. The lyndel replant the timothea. The lyndel flatten the timothea. If someone dissemble the lyndel then the lyndel is toothed. If someone dissemble the eliot then they visit the lyndel. If someone dissemble the eliot then they are puffed. Kind, edifying people are toothed. If someone replant the eliot and they visit the lyndel then the lyndel dissemble the timothea. If someone is puffed and they visit the lyndel then they chase the eliot. If someone replant the lyndel and the lyndel dissemble the eliot then they do not visit the timothea. If someone is toothed then they see the timothea. The timothea is not toothed.", "logic": "\nFlatten(eliot, lyndel)\nDissemble(timothea, eliot)\nEdifying(timothea)\nFlatten(timothea, lyndel)\nDissemble(lyndel, eliot)\nDissemble(lyndel, timothea)\nEdifying(lyndel)\nPlundering(lyndel)\nReplant(lyndel, timothea)\nFlatten(lyndel, timothea)\nforall x (Dissemble(x, lyndel) -> Toothed(lyndel))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, eliot) -> Flatten(x, lyndel))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, eliot) -> Puffed(x))\nforall x (Puffed(x) and Edifying(x) -> Toothed(x))\nforall x (Replant(x, eliot) and Flatten(x, lyndel) -> Dissemble(lyndel, timothea))\nforall x (Puffed(x) and Flatten(x, lyndel) -> Dissemble(x, eliot))\nforall x (Replant(x, lyndel) and Dissemble(lyndel, eliot) -> not Flatten(x, timothea))\nforall x (Toothed(x) -> Replant(x, timothea))\n\nnot Toothed(timothea)\n\nDissemble(timothea, eliot) and forall x (Dissemble(x, eliot) -> Puffed(x)) -> therefore Puffed(timothea) Puffed(timothea) and Edifying(timothea) and forall x (Puffed(x) and Edifying(x) -> Toothed(x)) -> therefore Toothed(timothea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The perla womanize the ronalda. The coral peeve the perla. The coral is unmown. The coral womanize the ronalda. The ronalda peeve the perla. The ronalda peeve the coral. The ronalda is unmown. The ronalda is setose. The ronalda bait the coral. The ronalda womanize the coral. If someone peeve the ronalda then the ronalda is fancy. If someone peeve the perla then they visit the ronalda. If someone peeve the perla then they are aneuploid. Kind, unmown people are fancy. If someone bait the perla and they visit the ronalda then the ronalda peeve the coral. If someone is aneuploid and they visit the ronalda then they chase the perla. If someone bait the ronalda and the ronalda peeve the perla then they do not visit the coral. If someone is fancy then they see the coral. The coral bait the coral.", "logic": "\nWomanize(perla, ronalda)\nPeeve(coral, perla)\nUnmown(coral)\nWomanize(coral, ronalda)\nPeeve(ronalda, perla)\nPeeve(ronalda, coral)\nUnmown(ronalda)\nSetose(ronalda)\nBait(ronalda, coral)\nWomanize(ronalda, coral)\nforall x (Peeve(x, ronalda) -> Fancy(ronalda))\nforall x (Peeve(x, perla) -> Womanize(x, ronalda))\nforall x (Peeve(x, perla) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) and Unmown(x) -> Fancy(x))\nforall x (Bait(x, perla) and Womanize(x, ronalda) -> Peeve(ronalda, coral))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) and Womanize(x, ronalda) -> Peeve(x, perla))\nforall x (Bait(x, ronalda) and Peeve(ronalda, perla) -> not Womanize(x, coral))\nforall x (Fancy(x) -> Bait(x, coral))\n\nBait(coral, coral)\n\nPeeve(coral, perla) and forall x (Peeve(x, perla) -> Aneuploid(x)) -> therefore Aneuploid(coral) Aneuploid(coral) and Unmown(coral) and forall x (Aneuploid(x) and Unmown(x) -> Fancy(x)) -> therefore Fancy(coral) Fancy(coral) and forall x (Fancy(x) -> Bait(x, coral)) -> therefore Bait(coral, coral)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The roby interview the marketa. The karlee enable the roby. The karlee is tartaric. The karlee interview the marketa. The marketa enable the roby. The marketa enable the karlee. The marketa is tartaric. The marketa is overall. The marketa orientate the karlee. The marketa interview the karlee. If someone enable the marketa then the marketa is palatable. If someone enable the roby then they visit the marketa. If someone enable the roby then they are topical. Kind, tartaric people are palatable. If someone orientate the roby and they visit the marketa then the marketa enable the karlee. If someone is topical and they visit the marketa then they chase the roby. If someone orientate the marketa and the marketa enable the roby then they do not visit the karlee. If someone is palatable then they see the karlee. The karlee does not see the karlee.", "logic": "\nInterview(roby, marketa)\nEnable(karlee, roby)\nTartaric(karlee)\nInterview(karlee, marketa)\nEnable(marketa, roby)\nEnable(marketa, karlee)\nTartaric(marketa)\nOverall(marketa)\nOrientate(marketa, karlee)\nInterview(marketa, karlee)\nforall x (Enable(x, marketa) -> Palatable(marketa))\nforall x (Enable(x, roby) -> Interview(x, marketa))\nforall x (Enable(x, roby) -> Topical(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) and Tartaric(x) -> Palatable(x))\nforall x (Orientate(x, roby) and Interview(x, marketa) -> Enable(marketa, karlee))\nforall x (Topical(x) and Interview(x, marketa) -> Enable(x, roby))\nforall x (Orientate(x, marketa) and Enable(marketa, roby) -> not Interview(x, karlee))\nforall x (Palatable(x) -> Orientate(x, karlee))\n\nnot Orientate(karlee, karlee)\n\nEnable(karlee, roby) and forall x (Enable(x, roby) -> Topical(x)) -> therefore Topical(karlee) Topical(karlee) and Tartaric(karlee) and forall x (Topical(x) and Tartaric(x) -> Palatable(x)) -> therefore Palatable(karlee) Palatable(karlee) and forall x (Palatable(x) -> Orientate(x, karlee)) -> therefore Orientate(karlee, karlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The cherlyn miscount the lazare. The alina delimitate the cherlyn. The alina is toothsome. The alina miscount the lazare. The lazare delimitate the cherlyn. The lazare delimitate the alina. The lazare is toothsome. The lazare is flyblown. The lazare detrain the alina. The lazare miscount the alina. If someone delimitate the lazare then the lazare is appellant. If someone delimitate the cherlyn then they visit the lazare. If someone delimitate the cherlyn then they are attenuate. Kind, toothsome people are appellant. If someone detrain the cherlyn and they visit the lazare then the lazare delimitate the alina. If someone is attenuate and they visit the lazare then they chase the cherlyn. If someone detrain the lazare and the lazare delimitate the cherlyn then they do not visit the alina. If someone is appellant then they see the alina. The cherlyn does not chase the cherlyn.", "logic": "\nMiscount(cherlyn, lazare)\nDelimitate(alina, cherlyn)\nToothsome(alina)\nMiscount(alina, lazare)\nDelimitate(lazare, cherlyn)\nDelimitate(lazare, alina)\nToothsome(lazare)\nFlyblown(lazare)\nDetrain(lazare, alina)\nMiscount(lazare, alina)\nforall x (Delimitate(x, lazare) -> Appellant(lazare))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, cherlyn) -> Miscount(x, lazare))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, cherlyn) -> Attenuate(x))\nforall x (Attenuate(x) and Toothsome(x) -> Appellant(x))\nforall x (Detrain(x, cherlyn) and Miscount(x, lazare) -> Delimitate(lazare, alina))\nforall x (Attenuate(x) and Miscount(x, lazare) -> Delimitate(x, cherlyn))\nforall x (Detrain(x, lazare) and Delimitate(lazare, cherlyn) -> not Miscount(x, alina))\nforall x (Appellant(x) -> Detrain(x, alina))\n\nnot Delimitate(cherlyn, cherlyn)\n\nforall x (Attenuate(x) and Miscount(x, lazare) -> Delimitate(x, cherlyn)) <- forall x (Delimitate(x, cherlyn) -> Attenuate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The olly laicize the georgina. The waverly sleuth the olly. The waverly is horrifying. The waverly laicize the georgina. The georgina sleuth the olly. The georgina sleuth the waverly. The georgina is horrifying. The georgina is unsoured. The georgina postpone the waverly. The georgina laicize the waverly. If someone sleuth the georgina then the georgina is amino. If someone sleuth the olly then they visit the georgina. If someone sleuth the olly then they are umbrageous. Kind, horrifying people are amino. If someone postpone the olly and they visit the georgina then the georgina sleuth the waverly. If someone is umbrageous and they visit the georgina then they chase the olly. If someone postpone the georgina and the georgina sleuth the olly then they do not visit the waverly. If someone is amino then they see the waverly. The olly is amino.", "logic": "\nLaicize(olly, georgina)\nSleuth(waverly, olly)\nHorrifying(waverly)\nLaicize(waverly, georgina)\nSleuth(georgina, olly)\nSleuth(georgina, waverly)\nHorrifying(georgina)\nUnsoured(georgina)\nPostpone(georgina, waverly)\nLaicize(georgina, waverly)\nforall x (Sleuth(x, georgina) -> Amino(georgina))\nforall x (Sleuth(x, olly) -> Laicize(x, georgina))\nforall x (Sleuth(x, olly) -> Umbrageous(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Horrifying(x) -> Amino(x))\nforall x (Postpone(x, olly) and Laicize(x, georgina) -> Sleuth(georgina, waverly))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Laicize(x, georgina) -> Sleuth(x, olly))\nforall x (Postpone(x, georgina) and Sleuth(georgina, olly) -> not Laicize(x, waverly))\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Postpone(x, waverly))\n\nAmino(olly)\n\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Horrifying(x) -> Amino(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The tracie fantasise the rosette. The earl caravan the tracie. The earl is algid. The earl fantasise the rosette. The rosette caravan the tracie. The rosette caravan the earl. The rosette is algid. The rosette is parasitic. The rosette abolish the earl. The rosette fantasise the earl. If someone caravan the rosette then the rosette is teeny. If someone caravan the tracie then they visit the rosette. If someone caravan the tracie then they are angelical. Kind, algid people are teeny. If someone abolish the tracie and they visit the rosette then the rosette caravan the earl. If someone is angelical and they visit the rosette then they chase the tracie. If someone abolish the rosette and the rosette caravan the tracie then they do not visit the earl. If someone is teeny then they see the earl. The tracie is not angelical.", "logic": "\nFantasise(tracie, rosette)\nCaravan(earl, tracie)\nAlgid(earl)\nFantasise(earl, rosette)\nCaravan(rosette, tracie)\nCaravan(rosette, earl)\nAlgid(rosette)\nParasitic(rosette)\nAbolish(rosette, earl)\nFantasise(rosette, earl)\nforall x (Caravan(x, rosette) -> Teeny(rosette))\nforall x (Caravan(x, tracie) -> Fantasise(x, rosette))\nforall x (Caravan(x, tracie) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Angelical(x) and Algid(x) -> Teeny(x))\nforall x (Abolish(x, tracie) and Fantasise(x, rosette) -> Caravan(rosette, earl))\nforall x (Angelical(x) and Fantasise(x, rosette) -> Caravan(x, tracie))\nforall x (Abolish(x, rosette) and Caravan(rosette, tracie) -> not Fantasise(x, earl))\nforall x (Teeny(x) -> Abolish(x, earl))\n\nnot Angelical(tracie)\n\nforall x (Caravan(x, tracie) -> Angelical(x)) <- forall x (Angelical(x) and Fantasise(x, rosette) -> Caravan(x, tracie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The carie list the dimitrios. The richy exudate the carie. The richy is garish. The richy list the dimitrios. The dimitrios exudate the carie. The dimitrios exudate the richy. The dimitrios is garish. The dimitrios is granulose. The dimitrios motorcycle the richy. The dimitrios list the richy. If someone exudate the dimitrios then the dimitrios is baric. If someone exudate the carie then they visit the dimitrios. If someone exudate the carie then they are burning. Kind, garish people are baric. If someone motorcycle the carie and they visit the dimitrios then the dimitrios exudate the richy. If someone is burning and they visit the dimitrios then they chase the carie. If someone motorcycle the dimitrios and the dimitrios exudate the carie then they do not visit the richy. If someone is baric then they see the richy. The carie motorcycle the richy.", "logic": "\nList(carie, dimitrios)\nExudate(richy, carie)\nGarish(richy)\nList(richy, dimitrios)\nExudate(dimitrios, carie)\nExudate(dimitrios, richy)\nGarish(dimitrios)\nGranulose(dimitrios)\nMotorcycle(dimitrios, richy)\nList(dimitrios, richy)\nforall x (Exudate(x, dimitrios) -> Baric(dimitrios))\nforall x (Exudate(x, carie) -> List(x, dimitrios))\nforall x (Exudate(x, carie) -> Burning(x))\nforall x (Burning(x) and Garish(x) -> Baric(x))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, carie) and List(x, dimitrios) -> Exudate(dimitrios, richy))\nforall x (Burning(x) and List(x, dimitrios) -> Exudate(x, carie))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, dimitrios) and Exudate(dimitrios, carie) -> not List(x, richy))\nforall x (Baric(x) -> Motorcycle(x, richy))\n\nMotorcycle(carie, richy)\n\nforall x (Baric(x) -> Motorcycle(x, richy)) <- forall x (Burning(x) and Garish(x) -> Baric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The michael fress the jason. The lelia cremate the michael. The lelia is tangy. The lelia fress the jason. The jason cremate the michael. The jason cremate the lelia. The jason is tangy. The jason is foliose. The jason armour the lelia. The jason fress the lelia. If someone cremate the jason then the jason is permeant. If someone cremate the michael then they visit the jason. If someone cremate the michael then they are dianoetic. Kind, tangy people are permeant. If someone armour the michael and they visit the jason then the jason cremate the lelia. If someone is dianoetic and they visit the jason then they chase the michael. If someone armour the jason and the jason cremate the michael then they do not visit the lelia. If someone is permeant then they see the lelia. The michael does not see the michael.", "logic": "\nFress(michael, jason)\nCremate(lelia, michael)\nTangy(lelia)\nFress(lelia, jason)\nCremate(jason, michael)\nCremate(jason, lelia)\nTangy(jason)\nFoliose(jason)\nArmour(jason, lelia)\nFress(jason, lelia)\nforall x (Cremate(x, jason) -> Permeant(jason))\nforall x (Cremate(x, michael) -> Fress(x, jason))\nforall x (Cremate(x, michael) -> Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Tangy(x) -> Permeant(x))\nforall x (Armour(x, michael) and Fress(x, jason) -> Cremate(jason, lelia))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Fress(x, jason) -> Cremate(x, michael))\nforall x (Armour(x, jason) and Cremate(jason, michael) -> not Fress(x, lelia))\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Armour(x, lelia))\n\nnot Armour(michael, michael)\n\nnot Armour(michael, michael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The linn balloon the ephrem. The baxter sharpshoot the linn. The baxter is diclinous. The baxter balloon the ephrem. The ephrem sharpshoot the linn. The ephrem sharpshoot the baxter. The ephrem is diclinous. The ephrem is seedy. The ephrem snatch the baxter. The ephrem balloon the baxter. If someone sharpshoot the ephrem then the ephrem is feudal. If someone sharpshoot the linn then they visit the ephrem. If someone sharpshoot the linn then they are twofold. Kind, diclinous people are feudal. If someone snatch the linn and they visit the ephrem then the ephrem sharpshoot the baxter. If someone is twofold and they visit the ephrem then they chase the linn. If someone snatch the ephrem and the ephrem sharpshoot the linn then they do not visit the baxter. If someone is feudal then they see the baxter. The baxter is seedy.", "logic": "\nBalloon(linn, ephrem)\nSharpshoot(baxter, linn)\nDiclinous(baxter)\nBalloon(baxter, ephrem)\nSharpshoot(ephrem, linn)\nSharpshoot(ephrem, baxter)\nDiclinous(ephrem)\nSeedy(ephrem)\nSnatch(ephrem, baxter)\nBalloon(ephrem, baxter)\nforall x (Sharpshoot(x, ephrem) -> Feudal(ephrem))\nforall x (Sharpshoot(x, linn) -> Balloon(x, ephrem))\nforall x (Sharpshoot(x, linn) -> Twofold(x))\nforall x (Twofold(x) and Diclinous(x) -> Feudal(x))\nforall x (Snatch(x, linn) and Balloon(x, ephrem) -> Sharpshoot(ephrem, baxter))\nforall x (Twofold(x) and Balloon(x, ephrem) -> Sharpshoot(x, linn))\nforall x (Snatch(x, ephrem) and Sharpshoot(ephrem, linn) -> not Balloon(x, baxter))\nforall x (Feudal(x) -> Snatch(x, baxter))\n\nSeedy(baxter)\n\nSeedy(baxter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The erl flog the mauricio. The francesco reshape the erl. The francesco is resistive. The francesco flog the mauricio. The mauricio reshape the erl. The mauricio reshape the francesco. The mauricio is resistive. The mauricio is capacious. The mauricio snipe the francesco. The mauricio flog the francesco. If someone reshape the mauricio then the mauricio is zymoid. If someone reshape the erl then they visit the mauricio. If someone reshape the erl then they are enervated. Kind, resistive people are zymoid. If someone snipe the erl and they visit the mauricio then the mauricio reshape the francesco. If someone is enervated and they visit the mauricio then they chase the erl. If someone snipe the mauricio and the mauricio reshape the erl then they do not visit the francesco. If someone is zymoid then they see the francesco. The francesco does not see the mauricio.", "logic": "\nFlog(erl, mauricio)\nReshape(francesco, erl)\nResistive(francesco)\nFlog(francesco, mauricio)\nReshape(mauricio, erl)\nReshape(mauricio, francesco)\nResistive(mauricio)\nCapacious(mauricio)\nSnipe(mauricio, francesco)\nFlog(mauricio, francesco)\nforall x (Reshape(x, mauricio) -> Zymoid(mauricio))\nforall x (Reshape(x, erl) -> Flog(x, mauricio))\nforall x (Reshape(x, erl) -> Enervated(x))\nforall x (Enervated(x) and Resistive(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Snipe(x, erl) and Flog(x, mauricio) -> Reshape(mauricio, francesco))\nforall x (Enervated(x) and Flog(x, mauricio) -> Reshape(x, erl))\nforall x (Snipe(x, mauricio) and Reshape(mauricio, erl) -> not Flog(x, francesco))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Snipe(x, francesco))\n\nnot Snipe(francesco, mauricio)\n\nnot Snipe(francesco, mauricio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The jany idle the franny. The tiffie ladder the jany. The tiffie is sectional. The tiffie idle the franny. The franny ladder the jany. The franny ladder the tiffie. The franny is sectional. The franny is underbred. The franny allude the tiffie. The franny idle the tiffie. If someone ladder the franny then the franny is conniving. If someone ladder the jany then they visit the franny. If someone ladder the jany then they are garmented. Kind, sectional people are conniving. If someone allude the jany and they visit the franny then the franny ladder the tiffie. If someone is garmented and they visit the franny then they chase the jany. If someone allude the franny and the franny ladder the jany then they do not visit the tiffie. If someone is conniving then they see the tiffie. The jany idle the jany.", "logic": "\nIdle(jany, franny)\nLadder(tiffie, jany)\nSectional(tiffie)\nIdle(tiffie, franny)\nLadder(franny, jany)\nLadder(franny, tiffie)\nSectional(franny)\nUnderbred(franny)\nAllude(franny, tiffie)\nIdle(franny, tiffie)\nforall x (Ladder(x, franny) -> Conniving(franny))\nforall x (Ladder(x, jany) -> Idle(x, franny))\nforall x (Ladder(x, jany) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Garmented(x) and Sectional(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Allude(x, jany) and Idle(x, franny) -> Ladder(franny, tiffie))\nforall x (Garmented(x) and Idle(x, franny) -> Ladder(x, jany))\nforall x (Allude(x, franny) and Ladder(franny, jany) -> not Idle(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Conniving(x) -> Allude(x, tiffie))\n\nIdle(jany, jany)\n\nIdle(jany, jany) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "Kristos is diligent. Kristos is unkept. Kristos is unengaged. Kristos is aeschylean. Prentiss is diligent. Prentiss is unengaged. Prentiss is unexploded. Althea is diligent. Althea is unengaged. Althea is caulescent. Althea is aggregate. Eran is caulescent. If Althea is caulescent then Althea is unengaged. All unengaged things are unkept. If something is caulescent and unkept then it is aggregate. All unkept, aeschylean things are aggregate. All unexploded, caulescent things are aeschylean. If something is aggregate then it is caulescent. If something is unengaged then it is diligent. All unkept things are aeschylean. Prentiss is unengaged.", "logic": "\nDiligent(kristos)\nUnkept(kristos)\nUnengaged(kristos)\nAeschylean(kristos)\nDiligent(prentiss)\nUnengaged(prentiss)\nUnexploded(prentiss)\nDiligent(althea)\nUnengaged(althea)\nCaulescent(althea)\nAggregate(althea)\nCaulescent(eran)\nCaulescent(althea) -> Unengaged(althea)\nforall x (Unengaged(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Caulescent(x) and Unkept(x) -> Aggregate(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) and Aeschylean(x) -> Aggregate(x))\nforall x (Unexploded(x) and Caulescent(x) -> Aeschylean(x))\nforall x (Aggregate(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Unengaged(x) -> Diligent(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Aeschylean(x))\n\nUnengaged(prentiss)\n\ntherefore Unengaged(prentiss)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Valaree is symbolic. Valaree is valvular. Valaree is cannular. Valaree is mousey. Caralie is symbolic. Caralie is cannular. Caralie is clumsy. Costa is symbolic. Costa is cannular. Costa is flaxen. Costa is incautious. Conway is flaxen. If Costa is flaxen then Costa is cannular. All cannular things are valvular. If something is flaxen and valvular then it is incautious. All valvular, mousey things are incautious. All clumsy, flaxen things are mousey. If something is incautious then it is flaxen. If something is cannular then it is symbolic. All valvular things are mousey. Caralie is not clumsy.", "logic": "\nSymbolic(valaree)\nValvular(valaree)\nCannular(valaree)\nMousey(valaree)\nSymbolic(caralie)\nCannular(caralie)\nClumsy(caralie)\nSymbolic(costa)\nCannular(costa)\nFlaxen(costa)\nIncautious(costa)\nFlaxen(conway)\nFlaxen(costa) -> Cannular(costa)\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Valvular(x))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) and Valvular(x) -> Incautious(x))\nforall x (Valvular(x) and Mousey(x) -> Incautious(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) and Flaxen(x) -> Mousey(x))\nforall x (Incautious(x) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Symbolic(x))\nforall x (Valvular(x) -> Mousey(x))\n\nnot Clumsy(caralie)\n\ntherefore Clumsy(caralie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Florry is divorced. Florry is erasable. Florry is alleged. Florry is ungainly. Sumner is divorced. Sumner is alleged. Sumner is sisterlike. Garth is divorced. Garth is alleged. Garth is tetragonal. Garth is unfunded. Lib is tetragonal. If Garth is tetragonal then Garth is alleged. All alleged things are erasable. If something is tetragonal and erasable then it is unfunded. All erasable, ungainly things are unfunded. All sisterlike, tetragonal things are ungainly. If something is unfunded then it is tetragonal. If something is alleged then it is divorced. All erasable things are ungainly. Sumner is erasable.", "logic": "\nDivorced(florry)\nErasable(florry)\nAlleged(florry)\nUngainly(florry)\nDivorced(sumner)\nAlleged(sumner)\nSisterlike(sumner)\nDivorced(garth)\nAlleged(garth)\nTetragonal(garth)\nUnfunded(garth)\nTetragonal(lib)\nTetragonal(garth) -> Alleged(garth)\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and Erasable(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Erasable(x) and Ungainly(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Sisterlike(x) and Tetragonal(x) -> Ungainly(x))\nforall x (Unfunded(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Divorced(x))\nforall x (Erasable(x) -> Ungainly(x))\n\nErasable(sumner)\n\nAlleged(sumner) and forall x (Alleged(x) -> Erasable(x)) -> therefore Erasable(sumner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Hedvig is disastrous. Hedvig is ramshackle. Hedvig is hunted. Hedvig is moveable. Pincus is disastrous. Pincus is hunted. Pincus is inevitable. Lissie is disastrous. Lissie is hunted. Lissie is ellipsoid. Lissie is eonian. Cristine is ellipsoid. If Lissie is ellipsoid then Lissie is hunted. All hunted things are ramshackle. If something is ellipsoid and ramshackle then it is eonian. All ramshackle, moveable things are eonian. All inevitable, ellipsoid things are moveable. If something is eonian then it is ellipsoid. If something is hunted then it is disastrous. All ramshackle things are moveable. Lissie is not ramshackle.", "logic": "\nDisastrous(hedvig)\nRamshackle(hedvig)\nHunted(hedvig)\nMoveable(hedvig)\nDisastrous(pincus)\nHunted(pincus)\nInevitable(pincus)\nDisastrous(lissie)\nHunted(lissie)\nEllipsoid(lissie)\nEonian(lissie)\nEllipsoid(cristine)\nEllipsoid(lissie) -> Hunted(lissie)\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Ramshackle(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Ramshackle(x) -> Eonian(x))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) and Moveable(x) -> Eonian(x))\nforall x (Inevitable(x) and Ellipsoid(x) -> Moveable(x))\nforall x (Eonian(x) -> Ellipsoid(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) -> Moveable(x))\n\nnot Ramshackle(lissie)\n\nHunted(lissie) and forall x (Hunted(x) -> Ramshackle(x)) -> therefore Ramshackle(lissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Delinda is wrinkled. Delinda is ramous. Delinda is pupillary. Delinda is untoasted. Joellen is wrinkled. Joellen is pupillary. Joellen is printable. Karleen is wrinkled. Karleen is pupillary. Karleen is cogitative. Karleen is abstruse. Weidar is cogitative. If Karleen is cogitative then Karleen is pupillary. All pupillary things are ramous. If something is cogitative and ramous then it is abstruse. All ramous, untoasted things are abstruse. All printable, cogitative things are untoasted. If something is abstruse then it is cogitative. If something is pupillary then it is wrinkled. All ramous things are untoasted. Joellen is untoasted.", "logic": "\nWrinkled(delinda)\nRamous(delinda)\nPupillary(delinda)\nUntoasted(delinda)\nWrinkled(joellen)\nPupillary(joellen)\nPrintable(joellen)\nWrinkled(karleen)\nPupillary(karleen)\nCogitative(karleen)\nAbstruse(karleen)\nCogitative(weidar)\nCogitative(karleen) -> Pupillary(karleen)\nforall x (Pupillary(x) -> Ramous(x))\nforall x (Cogitative(x) and Ramous(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Ramous(x) and Untoasted(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Printable(x) and Cogitative(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nforall x (Abstruse(x) -> Cogitative(x))\nforall x (Pupillary(x) -> Wrinkled(x))\nforall x (Ramous(x) -> Untoasted(x))\n\nUntoasted(joellen)\n\nPupillary(joellen) and forall x (Pupillary(x) -> Ramous(x)) -> therefore Ramous(joellen) Ramous(joellen) and forall x (Ramous(x) -> Untoasted(x)) -> therefore Untoasted(joellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Kingsly is sturdy. Kingsly is acapnial. Kingsly is unprepared. Kingsly is essential. Hannie is sturdy. Hannie is unprepared. Hannie is altissimo. Daveta is sturdy. Daveta is unprepared. Daveta is harmless. Daveta is stabbing. Emmeline is harmless. If Daveta is harmless then Daveta is unprepared. All unprepared things are acapnial. If something is harmless and acapnial then it is stabbing. All acapnial, essential things are stabbing. All altissimo, harmless things are essential. If something is stabbing then it is harmless. If something is unprepared then it is sturdy. All acapnial things are essential. Daveta is not essential.", "logic": "\nSturdy(kingsly)\nAcapnial(kingsly)\nUnprepared(kingsly)\nEssential(kingsly)\nSturdy(hannie)\nUnprepared(hannie)\nAltissimo(hannie)\nSturdy(daveta)\nUnprepared(daveta)\nHarmless(daveta)\nStabbing(daveta)\nHarmless(emmeline)\nHarmless(daveta) -> Unprepared(daveta)\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Acapnial(x))\nforall x (Harmless(x) and Acapnial(x) -> Stabbing(x))\nforall x (Acapnial(x) and Essential(x) -> Stabbing(x))\nforall x (Altissimo(x) and Harmless(x) -> Essential(x))\nforall x (Stabbing(x) -> Harmless(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Sturdy(x))\nforall x (Acapnial(x) -> Essential(x))\n\nnot Essential(daveta)\n\nUnprepared(daveta) and forall x (Unprepared(x) -> Acapnial(x)) -> therefore Acapnial(daveta) Acapnial(daveta) and forall x (Acapnial(x) -> Essential(x)) -> therefore Essential(daveta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Rodrique is ethnic. Rodrique is priceless. Rodrique is itinerant. Rodrique is phony. Fayth is ethnic. Fayth is itinerant. Fayth is enteral. Rube is ethnic. Rube is itinerant. Rube is dyspnoeal. Rube is monstrous. Hector is dyspnoeal. If Rube is dyspnoeal then Rube is itinerant. All itinerant things are priceless. If something is dyspnoeal and priceless then it is monstrous. All priceless, phony things are monstrous. All enteral, dyspnoeal things are phony. If something is monstrous then it is dyspnoeal. If something is itinerant then it is ethnic. All priceless things are phony. Fayth is monstrous.", "logic": "\nEthnic(rodrique)\nPriceless(rodrique)\nItinerant(rodrique)\nPhony(rodrique)\nEthnic(fayth)\nItinerant(fayth)\nEnteral(fayth)\nEthnic(rube)\nItinerant(rube)\nDyspnoeal(rube)\nMonstrous(rube)\nDyspnoeal(hector)\nDyspnoeal(rube) -> Itinerant(rube)\nforall x (Itinerant(x) -> Priceless(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeal(x) and Priceless(x) -> Monstrous(x))\nforall x (Priceless(x) and Phony(x) -> Monstrous(x))\nforall x (Enteral(x) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> Phony(x))\nforall x (Monstrous(x) -> Dyspnoeal(x))\nforall x (Itinerant(x) -> Ethnic(x))\nforall x (Priceless(x) -> Phony(x))\n\nMonstrous(fayth)\n\nItinerant(fayth) and forall x (Itinerant(x) -> Priceless(x)) -> therefore Priceless(fayth) Itinerant(fayth) and forall x (Itinerant(x) -> Priceless(x)) -> therefore Priceless(fayth) Priceless(fayth) and forall x (Priceless(x) -> Phony(x)) -> therefore Phony(fayth) Priceless(fayth) and Phony(fayth) and forall x (Priceless(x) and Phony(x) -> Monstrous(x)) -> therefore Monstrous(fayth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Jeff is nonmusical. Jeff is calceolate. Jeff is aliquot. Jeff is clenched. Eunice is nonmusical. Eunice is aliquot. Eunice is boon. Eydie is nonmusical. Eydie is aliquot. Eydie is venomous. Eydie is puzzling. Correna is venomous. If Eydie is venomous then Eydie is aliquot. All aliquot things are calceolate. If something is venomous and calceolate then it is puzzling. All calceolate, clenched things are puzzling. All boon, venomous things are clenched. If something is puzzling then it is venomous. If something is aliquot then it is nonmusical. All calceolate things are clenched. Eunice is not puzzling.", "logic": "\nNonmusical(jeff)\nCalceolate(jeff)\nAliquot(jeff)\nClenched(jeff)\nNonmusical(eunice)\nAliquot(eunice)\nBoon(eunice)\nNonmusical(eydie)\nAliquot(eydie)\nVenomous(eydie)\nPuzzling(eydie)\nVenomous(correna)\nVenomous(eydie) -> Aliquot(eydie)\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Venomous(x) and Calceolate(x) -> Puzzling(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) and Clenched(x) -> Puzzling(x))\nforall x (Boon(x) and Venomous(x) -> Clenched(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) -> Venomous(x))\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Nonmusical(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) -> Clenched(x))\n\nnot Puzzling(eunice)\n\nAliquot(eunice) and forall x (Aliquot(x) -> Calceolate(x)) -> therefore Calceolate(eunice) Aliquot(eunice) and forall x (Aliquot(x) -> Calceolate(x)) -> therefore Calceolate(eunice) Calceolate(eunice) and forall x (Calceolate(x) -> Clenched(x)) -> therefore Clenched(eunice) Calceolate(eunice) and Clenched(eunice) and forall x (Calceolate(x) and Clenched(x) -> Puzzling(x)) -> therefore Puzzling(eunice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Merrily is liverish. Merrily is incredible. Merrily is pushy. Merrily is portly. Rica is liverish. Rica is pushy. Rica is annular. Bernd is liverish. Bernd is pushy. Bernd is neuronal. Bernd is glutinous. Dacy is neuronal. If Bernd is neuronal then Bernd is pushy. All pushy things are incredible. If something is neuronal and incredible then it is glutinous. All incredible, portly things are glutinous. All annular, neuronal things are portly. If something is glutinous then it is neuronal. If something is pushy then it is liverish. All incredible things are portly. Dacy is not liverish.", "logic": "\nLiverish(merrily)\nIncredible(merrily)\nPushy(merrily)\nPortly(merrily)\nLiverish(rica)\nPushy(rica)\nAnnular(rica)\nLiverish(bernd)\nPushy(bernd)\nNeuronal(bernd)\nGlutinous(bernd)\nNeuronal(dacy)\nNeuronal(bernd) -> Pushy(bernd)\nforall x (Pushy(x) -> Incredible(x))\nforall x (Neuronal(x) and Incredible(x) -> Glutinous(x))\nforall x (Incredible(x) and Portly(x) -> Glutinous(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) and Neuronal(x) -> Portly(x))\nforall x (Glutinous(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Pushy(x) -> Liverish(x))\nforall x (Incredible(x) -> Portly(x))\n\nnot Liverish(dacy)\n\nforall x (Pushy(x) -> Liverish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Marj is reedy. Marj is calculous. Marj is oval. Marj is homy. Odilia is reedy. Odilia is oval. Odilia is cognitive. Ilene is reedy. Ilene is oval. Ilene is liked. Ilene is agamic. Jennette is liked. If Ilene is liked then Ilene is oval. All oval things are calculous. If something is liked and calculous then it is agamic. All calculous, homy things are agamic. All cognitive, liked things are homy. If something is agamic then it is liked. If something is oval then it is reedy. All calculous things are homy. Jennette is homy.", "logic": "\nReedy(marj)\nCalculous(marj)\nOval(marj)\nHomy(marj)\nReedy(odilia)\nOval(odilia)\nCognitive(odilia)\nReedy(ilene)\nOval(ilene)\nLiked(ilene)\nAgamic(ilene)\nLiked(jennette)\nLiked(ilene) -> Oval(ilene)\nforall x (Oval(x) -> Calculous(x))\nforall x (Liked(x) and Calculous(x) -> Agamic(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) and Homy(x) -> Agamic(x))\nforall x (Cognitive(x) and Liked(x) -> Homy(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Oval(x) -> Reedy(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) -> Homy(x))\n\nHomy(jennette)\n\nforall x (Calculous(x) -> Homy(x)) <- forall x (Oval(x) -> Calculous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Ramsey is satisfied. Ramsey is macabre. Ramsey is unsecured. Ramsey is damaged. Candra is satisfied. Candra is unsecured. Candra is adept. Billi is satisfied. Billi is unsecured. Billi is paneled. Billi is reverse. Ezechiel is paneled. If Billi is paneled then Billi is unsecured. All unsecured things are macabre. If something is paneled and macabre then it is reverse. All macabre, damaged things are reverse. All adept, paneled things are damaged. If something is reverse then it is paneled. If something is unsecured then it is satisfied. All macabre things are damaged. Ezechiel is not reverse.", "logic": "\nSatisfied(ramsey)\nMacabre(ramsey)\nUnsecured(ramsey)\nDamaged(ramsey)\nSatisfied(candra)\nUnsecured(candra)\nAdept(candra)\nSatisfied(billi)\nUnsecured(billi)\nPaneled(billi)\nReverse(billi)\nPaneled(ezechiel)\nPaneled(billi) -> Unsecured(billi)\nforall x (Unsecured(x) -> Macabre(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) and Macabre(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Macabre(x) and Damaged(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Adept(x) and Paneled(x) -> Damaged(x))\nforall x (Reverse(x) -> Paneled(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) -> Satisfied(x))\nforall x (Macabre(x) -> Damaged(x))\n\nnot Reverse(ezechiel)\n\nforall x (Paneled(x) and Macabre(x) -> Reverse(x)) <- forall x (Unsecured(x) -> Macabre(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Nina is ateleiotic. Nina is beefy. Nina is overstated. Nina is moneyed. Barnard is ateleiotic. Barnard is overstated. Barnard is hypertonic. Meg is ateleiotic. Meg is overstated. Meg is billion. Meg is circadian. Hershel is billion. If Meg is billion then Meg is overstated. All overstated things are beefy. If something is billion and beefy then it is circadian. All beefy, moneyed things are circadian. All hypertonic, billion things are moneyed. If something is circadian then it is billion. If something is overstated then it is ateleiotic. All beefy things are moneyed. Hershel is beefy.", "logic": "\nAteleiotic(nina)\nBeefy(nina)\nOverstated(nina)\nMoneyed(nina)\nAteleiotic(barnard)\nOverstated(barnard)\nHypertonic(barnard)\nAteleiotic(meg)\nOverstated(meg)\nBillion(meg)\nCircadian(meg)\nBillion(hershel)\nBillion(meg) -> Overstated(meg)\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> Beefy(x))\nforall x (Billion(x) and Beefy(x) -> Circadian(x))\nforall x (Beefy(x) and Moneyed(x) -> Circadian(x))\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) and Billion(x) -> Moneyed(x))\nforall x (Circadian(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> Ateleiotic(x))\nforall x (Beefy(x) -> Moneyed(x))\n\nBeefy(hershel)\n\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> Beefy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Martin is adoptable. Martin is billiard. Martin is recurring. Martin is standpat. Rodney is adoptable. Rodney is recurring. Rodney is otiose. Ikey is adoptable. Ikey is recurring. Ikey is sacculated. Ikey is crapulous. Bridie is sacculated. If Ikey is sacculated then Ikey is recurring. All recurring things are billiard. If something is sacculated and billiard then it is crapulous. All billiard, standpat things are crapulous. All otiose, sacculated things are standpat. If something is crapulous then it is sacculated. If something is recurring then it is adoptable. All billiard things are standpat. Bridie is not otiose.", "logic": "\nAdoptable(martin)\nBilliard(martin)\nRecurring(martin)\nStandpat(martin)\nAdoptable(rodney)\nRecurring(rodney)\nOtiose(rodney)\nAdoptable(ikey)\nRecurring(ikey)\nSacculated(ikey)\nCrapulous(ikey)\nSacculated(bridie)\nSacculated(ikey) -> Recurring(ikey)\nforall x (Recurring(x) -> Billiard(x))\nforall x (Sacculated(x) and Billiard(x) -> Crapulous(x))\nforall x (Billiard(x) and Standpat(x) -> Crapulous(x))\nforall x (Otiose(x) and Sacculated(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Crapulous(x) -> Sacculated(x))\nforall x (Recurring(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Billiard(x) -> Standpat(x))\n\nnot Otiose(bridie)\n\nnot Otiose(bridie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Leela is unsavory. Leela is bush. Leela is julian. Leela is compounded. Lissi is unsavory. Lissi is julian. Lissi is lazy. Dorena is unsavory. Dorena is julian. Dorena is stressed. Dorena is horizontal. Sam is stressed. If Dorena is stressed then Dorena is julian. All julian things are bush. If something is stressed and bush then it is horizontal. All bush, compounded things are horizontal. All lazy, stressed things are compounded. If something is horizontal then it is stressed. If something is julian then it is unsavory. All bush things are compounded. Dorena is lazy.", "logic": "\nUnsavory(leela)\nBush(leela)\nJulian(leela)\nCompounded(leela)\nUnsavory(lissi)\nJulian(lissi)\nLazy(lissi)\nUnsavory(dorena)\nJulian(dorena)\nStressed(dorena)\nHorizontal(dorena)\nStressed(sam)\nStressed(dorena) -> Julian(dorena)\nforall x (Julian(x) -> Bush(x))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and Bush(x) -> Horizontal(x))\nforall x (Bush(x) and Compounded(x) -> Horizontal(x))\nforall x (Lazy(x) and Stressed(x) -> Compounded(x))\nforall x (Horizontal(x) -> Stressed(x))\nforall x (Julian(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Compounded(x))\n\nLazy(dorena)\n\nLazy(dorena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Kat is inured. Kat is neuroglial. Kat is threatened. Kat is phlegmy. Lenora is inured. Lenora is threatened. Lenora is navicular. Therese is inured. Therese is threatened. Therese is umpteenth. Therese is geologic. Perla is umpteenth. If Therese is umpteenth then Therese is threatened. All threatened things are neuroglial. If something is umpteenth and neuroglial then it is geologic. All neuroglial, phlegmy things are geologic. All navicular, umpteenth things are phlegmy. If something is geologic then it is umpteenth. If something is threatened then it is inured. All neuroglial things are phlegmy. Kat is not navicular.", "logic": "\nInured(kat)\nNeuroglial(kat)\nThreatened(kat)\nPhlegmy(kat)\nInured(lenora)\nThreatened(lenora)\nNavicular(lenora)\nInured(therese)\nThreatened(therese)\nUmpteenth(therese)\nGeologic(therese)\nUmpteenth(perla)\nUmpteenth(therese) -> Threatened(therese)\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) and Neuroglial(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Neuroglial(x) and Phlegmy(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Navicular(x) and Umpteenth(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\nforall x (Geologic(x) -> Umpteenth(x))\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Neuroglial(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\n\nnot Navicular(kat)\n\nnot Navicular(kat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Frayda is lackluster. Frayda is thriftless. Frayda is favourite. Frayda is cenobitic. Gallagher is lackluster. Gallagher is favourite. Gallagher is ectodermic. Radcliffe is lackluster. Radcliffe is favourite. Radcliffe is awned. Radcliffe is baggy. Brianne is awned. If Radcliffe is awned then Radcliffe is favourite. All favourite things are thriftless. If something is awned and thriftless then it is baggy. All thriftless, cenobitic things are baggy. All ectodermic, awned things are cenobitic. If something is baggy then it is awned. If something is favourite then it is lackluster. All thriftless things are cenobitic. Brianne is favourite.", "logic": "\nLackluster(frayda)\nThriftless(frayda)\nFavourite(frayda)\nCenobitic(frayda)\nLackluster(gallagher)\nFavourite(gallagher)\nEctodermic(gallagher)\nLackluster(radcliffe)\nFavourite(radcliffe)\nAwned(radcliffe)\nBaggy(radcliffe)\nAwned(brianne)\nAwned(radcliffe) -> Favourite(radcliffe)\nforall x (Favourite(x) -> Thriftless(x))\nforall x (Awned(x) and Thriftless(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Thriftless(x) and Cenobitic(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Ectodermic(x) and Awned(x) -> Cenobitic(x))\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Awned(x))\nforall x (Favourite(x) -> Lackluster(x))\nforall x (Thriftless(x) -> Cenobitic(x))\n\nFavourite(brianne)\n\nFavourite(brianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Beitris is brainy. Binnie is upright. Granville is serial. Round things are upright. If Beitris is sadistic then Beitris is blockading. If something is serial and trusty then it is upright. If something is serial then it is blockading. Blue, serial things are squeaky. If something is squeaky then it is sadistic. Blue, upright things are brainy. All brainy, sadistic things are serial. Granville is serial.", "logic": "\nBrainy(beitris)\nUpright(binnie)\nSerial(granville)\nforall x (Trusty(x) -> Upright(x))\nSadistic(beitris) -> Blockading(beitris)\nforall x (Serial(x) and Trusty(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Serial(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Serial(x) -> Squeaky(x))\nforall x (Squeaky(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Upright(x) -> Brainy(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) and Sadistic(x) -> Serial(x))\n\nSerial(granville)\n\ntherefore Serial(granville)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Mireille is dependant. Robinetta is nary. Flinn is quartzose. Round things are nary. If Mireille is reddened then Mireille is impressed. If something is quartzose and bowery then it is nary. If something is quartzose then it is impressed. Blue, quartzose things are dogmatic. If something is dogmatic then it is reddened. Blue, nary things are dependant. All dependant, reddened things are quartzose. Mireille is not dependant.", "logic": "\nDependant(mireille)\nNary(robinetta)\nQuartzose(flinn)\nforall x (Bowery(x) -> Nary(x))\nReddened(mireille) -> Impressed(mireille)\nforall x (Quartzose(x) and Bowery(x) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Quartzose(x) -> Impressed(x))\nforall x (Impressed(x) and Quartzose(x) -> Dogmatic(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Reddened(x))\nforall x (Impressed(x) and Nary(x) -> Dependant(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) and Reddened(x) -> Quartzose(x))\n\nnot Dependant(mireille)\n\ntherefore Dependant(mireille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Barnabe is cracked. Tonya is perdurable. Meghan is duodecimal. Round things are perdurable. If Barnabe is bankrupt then Barnabe is honest. If something is duodecimal and stingless then it is perdurable. If something is duodecimal then it is honest. Blue, duodecimal things are buoyant. If something is buoyant then it is bankrupt. Blue, perdurable things are cracked. All cracked, bankrupt things are duodecimal. Meghan is honest.", "logic": "\nCracked(barnabe)\nPerdurable(tonya)\nDuodecimal(meghan)\nforall x (Stingless(x) -> Perdurable(x))\nBankrupt(barnabe) -> Honest(barnabe)\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) and Stingless(x) -> Perdurable(x))\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> Honest(x))\nforall x (Honest(x) and Duodecimal(x) -> Buoyant(x))\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Honest(x) and Perdurable(x) -> Cracked(x))\nforall x (Cracked(x) and Bankrupt(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\n\nHonest(meghan)\n\nDuodecimal(meghan) and forall x (Duodecimal(x) -> Honest(x)) -> therefore Honest(meghan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Eve is pilous. Elmira is hilar. Valerye is sizeable. Round things are hilar. If Eve is freudian then Eve is tending. If something is sizeable and ugandan then it is hilar. If something is sizeable then it is tending. Blue, sizeable things are coiling. If something is coiling then it is freudian. Blue, hilar things are pilous. All pilous, freudian things are sizeable. Valerye is not tending.", "logic": "\nPilous(eve)\nHilar(elmira)\nSizeable(valerye)\nforall x (Ugandan(x) -> Hilar(x))\nFreudian(eve) -> Tending(eve)\nforall x (Sizeable(x) and Ugandan(x) -> Hilar(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) -> Tending(x))\nforall x (Tending(x) and Sizeable(x) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Freudian(x))\nforall x (Tending(x) and Hilar(x) -> Pilous(x))\nforall x (Pilous(x) and Freudian(x) -> Sizeable(x))\n\nnot Tending(valerye)\n\nSizeable(valerye) and forall x (Sizeable(x) -> Tending(x)) -> therefore Tending(valerye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Baird is tillable. Jolynn is tallish. Conney is adducting. Round things are tallish. If Baird is unsymbolic then Baird is violative. If something is adducting and shrieked then it is tallish. If something is adducting then it is violative. Blue, adducting things are multicolor. If something is multicolor then it is unsymbolic. Blue, tallish things are tillable. All tillable, unsymbolic things are adducting. Conney is multicolor.", "logic": "\nTillable(baird)\nTallish(jolynn)\nAdducting(conney)\nforall x (Shrieked(x) -> Tallish(x))\nUnsymbolic(baird) -> Violative(baird)\nforall x (Adducting(x) and Shrieked(x) -> Tallish(x))\nforall x (Adducting(x) -> Violative(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) and Adducting(x) -> Multicolor(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> Unsymbolic(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) and Tallish(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Tillable(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Adducting(x))\n\nMulticolor(conney)\n\nAdducting(conney) and forall x (Adducting(x) -> Violative(x)) -> therefore Violative(conney) Violative(conney) and Adducting(conney) and forall x (Violative(x) and Adducting(x) -> Multicolor(x)) -> therefore Multicolor(conney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Jemimah is crossbred. Rosalyn is unmoved. Karrie is sluttish. Round things are unmoved. If Jemimah is storied then Jemimah is umteen. If something is sluttish and skinned then it is unmoved. If something is sluttish then it is umteen. Blue, sluttish things are fizzing. If something is fizzing then it is storied. Blue, unmoved things are crossbred. All crossbred, storied things are sluttish. Karrie is not fizzing.", "logic": "\nCrossbred(jemimah)\nUnmoved(rosalyn)\nSluttish(karrie)\nforall x (Skinned(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nStoried(jemimah) -> Umteen(jemimah)\nforall x (Sluttish(x) and Skinned(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Sluttish(x) -> Umteen(x))\nforall x (Umteen(x) and Sluttish(x) -> Fizzing(x))\nforall x (Fizzing(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Umteen(x) and Unmoved(x) -> Crossbred(x))\nforall x (Crossbred(x) and Storied(x) -> Sluttish(x))\n\nnot Fizzing(karrie)\n\nSluttish(karrie) and forall x (Sluttish(x) -> Umteen(x)) -> therefore Umteen(karrie) Umteen(karrie) and Sluttish(karrie) and forall x (Umteen(x) and Sluttish(x) -> Fizzing(x)) -> therefore Fizzing(karrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Crista is caducous. Kimberly is tuberous. Betteann is comal. Round things are tuberous. If Crista is mannerly then Crista is ramshackle. If something is comal and augean then it is tuberous. If something is comal then it is ramshackle. Blue, comal things are canicular. If something is canicular then it is mannerly. Blue, tuberous things are caducous. All caducous, mannerly things are comal. Betteann is mannerly.", "logic": "\nCaducous(crista)\nTuberous(kimberly)\nComal(betteann)\nforall x (Augean(x) -> Tuberous(x))\nMannerly(crista) -> Ramshackle(crista)\nforall x (Comal(x) and Augean(x) -> Tuberous(x))\nforall x (Comal(x) -> Ramshackle(x))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) and Comal(x) -> Canicular(x))\nforall x (Canicular(x) -> Mannerly(x))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) and Tuberous(x) -> Caducous(x))\nforall x (Caducous(x) and Mannerly(x) -> Comal(x))\n\nMannerly(betteann)\n\nComal(betteann) and forall x (Comal(x) -> Ramshackle(x)) -> therefore Ramshackle(betteann) Ramshackle(betteann) and Comal(betteann) and forall x (Ramshackle(x) and Comal(x) -> Canicular(x)) -> therefore Canicular(betteann) Canicular(betteann) and forall x (Canicular(x) -> Mannerly(x)) -> therefore Mannerly(betteann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Shilpa is chaotic. Denna is prurient. Eben is shintoist. Round things are prurient. If Shilpa is gardant then Shilpa is polymeric. If something is shintoist and orthogonal then it is prurient. If something is shintoist then it is polymeric. Blue, shintoist things are parvenu. If something is parvenu then it is gardant. Blue, prurient things are chaotic. All chaotic, gardant things are shintoist. Eben is not gardant.", "logic": "\nChaotic(shilpa)\nPrurient(denna)\nShintoist(eben)\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) -> Prurient(x))\nGardant(shilpa) -> Polymeric(shilpa)\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and Orthogonal(x) -> Prurient(x))\nforall x (Shintoist(x) -> Polymeric(x))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) and Shintoist(x) -> Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Gardant(x))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) and Prurient(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Chaotic(x) and Gardant(x) -> Shintoist(x))\n\nnot Gardant(eben)\n\nShintoist(eben) and forall x (Shintoist(x) -> Polymeric(x)) -> therefore Polymeric(eben) Polymeric(eben) and Shintoist(eben) and forall x (Polymeric(x) and Shintoist(x) -> Parvenu(x)) -> therefore Parvenu(eben) Parvenu(eben) and forall x (Parvenu(x) -> Gardant(x)) -> therefore Gardant(eben)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Chelsey is upright. Micheil is depressant. Pavia is untoothed. Round things are depressant. If Chelsey is preteen then Chelsey is asphaltic. If something is untoothed and brocaded then it is depressant. If something is untoothed then it is asphaltic. Blue, untoothed things are romanic. If something is romanic then it is preteen. Blue, depressant things are upright. All upright, preteen things are untoothed. Chelsey is not depressant.", "logic": "\nUpright(chelsey)\nDepressant(micheil)\nUntoothed(pavia)\nforall x (Brocaded(x) -> Depressant(x))\nPreteen(chelsey) -> Asphaltic(chelsey)\nforall x (Untoothed(x) and Brocaded(x) -> Depressant(x))\nforall x (Untoothed(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and Untoothed(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Romanic(x) -> Preteen(x))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and Depressant(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) and Preteen(x) -> Untoothed(x))\n\nnot Depressant(chelsey)\n\nforall x (Brocaded(x) -> Depressant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Lusa is cadenced. Lettie is vacuolated. Ronnica is libelous. Round things are vacuolated. If Lusa is carbonylic then Lusa is queer. If something is libelous and effected then it is vacuolated. If something is libelous then it is queer. Blue, libelous things are lavender. If something is lavender then it is carbonylic. Blue, vacuolated things are cadenced. All cadenced, carbonylic things are libelous. Lusa is libelous.", "logic": "\nCadenced(lusa)\nVacuolated(lettie)\nLibelous(ronnica)\nforall x (Effected(x) -> Vacuolated(x))\nCarbonylic(lusa) -> Queer(lusa)\nforall x (Libelous(x) and Effected(x) -> Vacuolated(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Queer(x))\nforall x (Queer(x) and Libelous(x) -> Lavender(x))\nforall x (Lavender(x) -> Carbonylic(x))\nforall x (Queer(x) and Vacuolated(x) -> Cadenced(x))\nforall x (Cadenced(x) and Carbonylic(x) -> Libelous(x))\n\nLibelous(lusa)\n\nforall x (Cadenced(x) and Carbonylic(x) -> Libelous(x)) <- forall x (Lavender(x) -> Carbonylic(x)) <- forall x (Queer(x) and Libelous(x) -> Lavender(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Lucita is sickly. Marlin is ramous. Althea is combatant. Round things are ramous. If Lucita is meshed then Lucita is greedy. If something is combatant and piecemeal then it is ramous. If something is combatant then it is greedy. Blue, combatant things are touching. If something is touching then it is meshed. Blue, ramous things are sickly. All sickly, meshed things are combatant. Lucita is not meshed.", "logic": "\nSickly(lucita)\nRamous(marlin)\nCombatant(althea)\nforall x (Piecemeal(x) -> Ramous(x))\nMeshed(lucita) -> Greedy(lucita)\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Piecemeal(x) -> Ramous(x))\nforall x (Combatant(x) -> Greedy(x))\nforall x (Greedy(x) and Combatant(x) -> Touching(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Meshed(x))\nforall x (Greedy(x) and Ramous(x) -> Sickly(x))\nforall x (Sickly(x) and Meshed(x) -> Combatant(x))\n\nnot Meshed(lucita)\n\nforall x (Touching(x) -> Meshed(x)) <- forall x (Greedy(x) and Combatant(x) -> Touching(x)) <- forall x (Sickly(x) and Meshed(x) -> Combatant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Myra is condylar. Rozelle is backswept. Kathlene is blameless. Round things are backswept. If Myra is frail then Myra is ungreased. If something is blameless and cruddy then it is backswept. If something is blameless then it is ungreased. Blue, blameless things are reformable. If something is reformable then it is frail. Blue, backswept things are condylar. All condylar, frail things are blameless. Rozelle is blameless.", "logic": "\nCondylar(myra)\nBackswept(rozelle)\nBlameless(kathlene)\nforall x (Cruddy(x) -> Backswept(x))\nFrail(myra) -> Ungreased(myra)\nforall x (Blameless(x) and Cruddy(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Blameless(x) -> Ungreased(x))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Blameless(x) -> Reformable(x))\nforall x (Reformable(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Backswept(x) -> Condylar(x))\nforall x (Condylar(x) and Frail(x) -> Blameless(x))\n\nBlameless(rozelle)\n\nforall x (Condylar(x) and Frail(x) -> Blameless(x)) <- forall x (Ungreased(x) and Backswept(x) -> Condylar(x)) <- forall x (Blameless(x) -> Ungreased(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Rafe is germicidal. Malinda is matching. Abbe is mental. Round things are matching. If Rafe is shingly then Rafe is posterior. If something is mental and stodgy then it is matching. If something is mental then it is posterior. Blue, mental things are ulnar. If something is ulnar then it is shingly. Blue, matching things are germicidal. All germicidal, shingly things are mental. Abbe is not stodgy.", "logic": "\nGermicidal(rafe)\nMatching(malinda)\nMental(abbe)\nforall x (Stodgy(x) -> Matching(x))\nShingly(rafe) -> Posterior(rafe)\nforall x (Mental(x) and Stodgy(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) -> Posterior(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) and Mental(x) -> Ulnar(x))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Shingly(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) and Matching(x) -> Germicidal(x))\nforall x (Germicidal(x) and Shingly(x) -> Mental(x))\n\nnot Stodgy(abbe)\n\nnot Stodgy(abbe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Ilene is prostate. Celisse is messianic. Rockwell is pressed. Round things are messianic. If Ilene is soulless then Ilene is semipublic. If something is pressed and anginose then it is messianic. If something is pressed then it is semipublic. Blue, pressed things are epicyclic. If something is epicyclic then it is soulless. Blue, messianic things are prostate. All prostate, soulless things are pressed. Celisse is anginose.", "logic": "\nProstate(ilene)\nMessianic(celisse)\nPressed(rockwell)\nforall x (Anginose(x) -> Messianic(x))\nSoulless(ilene) -> Semipublic(ilene)\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Anginose(x) -> Messianic(x))\nforall x (Pressed(x) -> Semipublic(x))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) and Pressed(x) -> Epicyclic(x))\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) -> Soulless(x))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) and Messianic(x) -> Prostate(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) and Soulless(x) -> Pressed(x))\n\nAnginose(celisse)\n\nAnginose(celisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "The heidie mince the ginnie. The barr mince the heidie. The jacqui unbar the heidie. The ginnie mince the heidie. If someone shamanize the ginnie and the ginnie mince the heidie then the ginnie shamanize the jacqui. If someone shamanize the jacqui then the jacqui unbar the ginnie. If someone unbar the ginnie and the ginnie unbar the jacqui then the ginnie mince the jacqui. If someone unbar the heidie then they like the ginnie. If someone mince the barr then they like the ginnie. If someone mince the ginnie then they eat the jacqui. If someone mince the jacqui and the jacqui does not like the barr then the barr mince the heidie. All spatial people are not fractional. The ginnie mince the heidie.", "logic": "\nMince(heidie, ginnie)\nMince(barr, heidie)\nUnbar(jacqui, heidie)\nMince(ginnie, heidie)\nforall x (Shamanize(x, ginnie) and Mince(ginnie, heidie) -> Shamanize(ginnie, jacqui))\nforall x (Shamanize(x, jacqui) -> Unbar(jacqui, ginnie))\nforall x (Unbar(x, ginnie) and Unbar(ginnie, jacqui) -> Mince(ginnie, jacqui))\nforall x (Unbar(x, heidie) -> Shamanize(x, ginnie))\nforall x (Mince(x, barr) -> Shamanize(x, ginnie))\nforall x (Mince(x, ginnie) -> Unbar(x, jacqui))\nforall x (Mince(x, jacqui) and not Shamanize(jacqui, barr) -> Mince(barr, heidie))\nforall x (Spatial(x) -> not Fractional(x))\n\nMince(ginnie, heidie)\n\ntherefore Mince(ginnie, heidie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The riley sledge the calley. The elyse sledge the riley. The tessie mislead the riley. The calley sledge the riley. If someone snuff the calley and the calley sledge the riley then the calley snuff the tessie. If someone snuff the tessie then the tessie mislead the calley. If someone mislead the calley and the calley mislead the tessie then the calley sledge the tessie. If someone mislead the riley then they like the calley. If someone sledge the elyse then they like the calley. If someone sledge the calley then they eat the tessie. If someone sledge the tessie and the tessie does not like the elyse then the elyse sledge the riley. All idolized people are not opposable. The tessie does not eat the riley.", "logic": "\nSledge(riley, calley)\nSledge(elyse, riley)\nMislead(tessie, riley)\nSledge(calley, riley)\nforall x (Snuff(x, calley) and Sledge(calley, riley) -> Snuff(calley, tessie))\nforall x (Snuff(x, tessie) -> Mislead(tessie, calley))\nforall x (Mislead(x, calley) and Mislead(calley, tessie) -> Sledge(calley, tessie))\nforall x (Mislead(x, riley) -> Snuff(x, calley))\nforall x (Sledge(x, elyse) -> Snuff(x, calley))\nforall x (Sledge(x, calley) -> Mislead(x, tessie))\nforall x (Sledge(x, tessie) and not Snuff(tessie, elyse) -> Sledge(elyse, riley))\nforall x (Idolized(x) -> not Opposable(x))\n\nnot Mislead(tessie, riley)\n\ntherefore Mislead(tessie, riley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The giana bloody the fidelia. The raynard bloody the giana. The carlita whiff the giana. The fidelia bloody the giana. If someone camouflage the fidelia and the fidelia bloody the giana then the fidelia camouflage the carlita. If someone camouflage the carlita then the carlita whiff the fidelia. If someone whiff the fidelia and the fidelia whiff the carlita then the fidelia bloody the carlita. If someone whiff the giana then they like the fidelia. If someone bloody the raynard then they like the fidelia. If someone bloody the fidelia then they eat the carlita. If someone bloody the carlita and the carlita does not like the raynard then the raynard bloody the giana. All stylish people are not gladsome. The giana whiff the carlita.", "logic": "\nBloody(giana, fidelia)\nBloody(raynard, giana)\nWhiff(carlita, giana)\nBloody(fidelia, giana)\nforall x (Camouflage(x, fidelia) and Bloody(fidelia, giana) -> Camouflage(fidelia, carlita))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, carlita) -> Whiff(carlita, fidelia))\nforall x (Whiff(x, fidelia) and Whiff(fidelia, carlita) -> Bloody(fidelia, carlita))\nforall x (Whiff(x, giana) -> Camouflage(x, fidelia))\nforall x (Bloody(x, raynard) -> Camouflage(x, fidelia))\nforall x (Bloody(x, fidelia) -> Whiff(x, carlita))\nforall x (Bloody(x, carlita) and not Camouflage(carlita, raynard) -> Bloody(raynard, giana))\nforall x (Stylish(x) -> not Gladsome(x))\n\nWhiff(giana, carlita)\n\nBloody(giana, fidelia) and forall x (Bloody(x, fidelia) -> Whiff(x, carlita)) -> therefore Whiff(giana, carlita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The ceil scab the ardelis. The ermina scab the ceil. The ruperta consent the ceil. The ardelis scab the ceil. If someone canter the ardelis and the ardelis scab the ceil then the ardelis canter the ruperta. If someone canter the ruperta then the ruperta consent the ardelis. If someone consent the ardelis and the ardelis consent the ruperta then the ardelis scab the ruperta. If someone consent the ceil then they like the ardelis. If someone scab the ermina then they like the ardelis. If someone scab the ardelis then they eat the ruperta. If someone scab the ruperta and the ruperta does not like the ermina then the ermina scab the ceil. All curving people are not aural. The ceil does not eat the ruperta.", "logic": "\nScab(ceil, ardelis)\nScab(ermina, ceil)\nConsent(ruperta, ceil)\nScab(ardelis, ceil)\nforall x (Canter(x, ardelis) and Scab(ardelis, ceil) -> Canter(ardelis, ruperta))\nforall x (Canter(x, ruperta) -> Consent(ruperta, ardelis))\nforall x (Consent(x, ardelis) and Consent(ardelis, ruperta) -> Scab(ardelis, ruperta))\nforall x (Consent(x, ceil) -> Canter(x, ardelis))\nforall x (Scab(x, ermina) -> Canter(x, ardelis))\nforall x (Scab(x, ardelis) -> Consent(x, ruperta))\nforall x (Scab(x, ruperta) and not Canter(ruperta, ermina) -> Scab(ermina, ceil))\nforall x (Curving(x) -> not Aural(x))\n\nnot Consent(ceil, ruperta)\n\nScab(ceil, ardelis) and forall x (Scab(x, ardelis) -> Consent(x, ruperta)) -> therefore Consent(ceil, ruperta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The rosabelle bogey the lorie. The horace bogey the rosabelle. The fanechka ease the rosabelle. The lorie bogey the rosabelle. If someone freckle the lorie and the lorie bogey the rosabelle then the lorie freckle the fanechka. If someone freckle the fanechka then the fanechka ease the lorie. If someone ease the lorie and the lorie ease the fanechka then the lorie bogey the fanechka. If someone ease the rosabelle then they like the lorie. If someone bogey the horace then they like the lorie. If someone bogey the lorie then they eat the fanechka. If someone bogey the fanechka and the fanechka does not like the horace then the horace bogey the rosabelle. All genic people are not northeast. The lorie freckle the fanechka.", "logic": "\nBogey(rosabelle, lorie)\nBogey(horace, rosabelle)\nEase(fanechka, rosabelle)\nBogey(lorie, rosabelle)\nforall x (Freckle(x, lorie) and Bogey(lorie, rosabelle) -> Freckle(lorie, fanechka))\nforall x (Freckle(x, fanechka) -> Ease(fanechka, lorie))\nforall x (Ease(x, lorie) and Ease(lorie, fanechka) -> Bogey(lorie, fanechka))\nforall x (Ease(x, rosabelle) -> Freckle(x, lorie))\nforall x (Bogey(x, horace) -> Freckle(x, lorie))\nforall x (Bogey(x, lorie) -> Ease(x, fanechka))\nforall x (Bogey(x, fanechka) and not Freckle(fanechka, horace) -> Bogey(horace, rosabelle))\nforall x (Genic(x) -> not Northeast(x))\n\nFreckle(lorie, fanechka)\n\nEase(fanechka, rosabelle) and forall x (Ease(x, rosabelle) -> Freckle(x, lorie)) -> therefore Freckle(fanechka, lorie) Freckle(fanechka, lorie) and Bogey(lorie, rosabelle) and forall x (Freckle(x, lorie) and Bogey(lorie, rosabelle) -> Freckle(lorie, fanechka)) -> therefore Freckle(lorie, fanechka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The barbie warble the sebastien. The michael warble the barbie. The sibilla patch the barbie. The sebastien warble the barbie. If someone unblock the sebastien and the sebastien warble the barbie then the sebastien unblock the sibilla. If someone unblock the sibilla then the sibilla patch the sebastien. If someone patch the sebastien and the sebastien patch the sibilla then the sebastien warble the sibilla. If someone patch the barbie then they like the sebastien. If someone warble the michael then they like the sebastien. If someone warble the sebastien then they eat the sibilla. If someone warble the sibilla and the sibilla does not like the michael then the michael warble the barbie. All maroon people are not antibiotic. The sebastien does not like the sibilla.", "logic": "\nWarble(barbie, sebastien)\nWarble(michael, barbie)\nPatch(sibilla, barbie)\nWarble(sebastien, barbie)\nforall x (Unblock(x, sebastien) and Warble(sebastien, barbie) -> Unblock(sebastien, sibilla))\nforall x (Unblock(x, sibilla) -> Patch(sibilla, sebastien))\nforall x (Patch(x, sebastien) and Patch(sebastien, sibilla) -> Warble(sebastien, sibilla))\nforall x (Patch(x, barbie) -> Unblock(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Warble(x, michael) -> Unblock(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Warble(x, sebastien) -> Patch(x, sibilla))\nforall x (Warble(x, sibilla) and not Unblock(sibilla, michael) -> Warble(michael, barbie))\nforall x (Maroon(x) -> not Antibiotic(x))\n\nnot Unblock(sebastien, sibilla)\n\nPatch(sibilla, barbie) and forall x (Patch(x, barbie) -> Unblock(x, sebastien)) -> therefore Unblock(sibilla, sebastien) Unblock(sibilla, sebastien) and Warble(sebastien, barbie) and forall x (Unblock(x, sebastien) and Warble(sebastien, barbie) -> Unblock(sebastien, sibilla)) -> therefore Unblock(sebastien, sibilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The maryellen glamourize the sheba. The guinna glamourize the maryellen. The amberly prune the maryellen. The sheba glamourize the maryellen. If someone gloss the sheba and the sheba glamourize the maryellen then the sheba gloss the amberly. If someone gloss the amberly then the amberly prune the sheba. If someone prune the sheba and the sheba prune the amberly then the sheba glamourize the amberly. If someone prune the maryellen then they like the sheba. If someone glamourize the guinna then they like the sheba. If someone glamourize the sheba then they eat the amberly. If someone glamourize the amberly and the amberly does not like the guinna then the guinna glamourize the maryellen. All postural people are not porcine. The amberly prune the sheba.", "logic": "\nGlamourize(maryellen, sheba)\nGlamourize(guinna, maryellen)\nPrune(amberly, maryellen)\nGlamourize(sheba, maryellen)\nforall x (Gloss(x, sheba) and Glamourize(sheba, maryellen) -> Gloss(sheba, amberly))\nforall x (Gloss(x, amberly) -> Prune(amberly, sheba))\nforall x (Prune(x, sheba) and Prune(sheba, amberly) -> Glamourize(sheba, amberly))\nforall x (Prune(x, maryellen) -> Gloss(x, sheba))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, guinna) -> Gloss(x, sheba))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, sheba) -> Prune(x, amberly))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, amberly) and not Gloss(amberly, guinna) -> Glamourize(guinna, maryellen))\nforall x (Postural(x) -> not Porcine(x))\n\nPrune(amberly, sheba)\n\nPrune(amberly, maryellen) and forall x (Prune(x, maryellen) -> Gloss(x, sheba)) -> therefore Gloss(amberly, sheba) Gloss(amberly, sheba) and Glamourize(sheba, maryellen) and forall x (Gloss(x, sheba) and Glamourize(sheba, maryellen) -> Gloss(sheba, amberly)) -> therefore Gloss(sheba, amberly) Gloss(sheba, amberly) and forall x (Gloss(x, amberly) -> Prune(amberly, sheba)) -> therefore Prune(amberly, sheba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The dorthea ostracise the ashlee. The virgilio ostracise the dorthea. The torre flight the dorthea. The ashlee ostracise the dorthea. If someone socialize the ashlee and the ashlee ostracise the dorthea then the ashlee socialize the torre. If someone socialize the torre then the torre flight the ashlee. If someone flight the ashlee and the ashlee flight the torre then the ashlee ostracise the torre. If someone flight the dorthea then they like the ashlee. If someone ostracise the virgilio then they like the ashlee. If someone ostracise the ashlee then they eat the torre. If someone ostracise the torre and the torre does not like the virgilio then the virgilio ostracise the dorthea. All remorseful people are not political. The torre does not eat the ashlee.", "logic": "\nOstracise(dorthea, ashlee)\nOstracise(virgilio, dorthea)\nFlight(torre, dorthea)\nOstracise(ashlee, dorthea)\nforall x (Socialize(x, ashlee) and Ostracise(ashlee, dorthea) -> Socialize(ashlee, torre))\nforall x (Socialize(x, torre) -> Flight(torre, ashlee))\nforall x (Flight(x, ashlee) and Flight(ashlee, torre) -> Ostracise(ashlee, torre))\nforall x (Flight(x, dorthea) -> Socialize(x, ashlee))\nforall x (Ostracise(x, virgilio) -> Socialize(x, ashlee))\nforall x (Ostracise(x, ashlee) -> Flight(x, torre))\nforall x (Ostracise(x, torre) and not Socialize(torre, virgilio) -> Ostracise(virgilio, dorthea))\nforall x (Remorseful(x) -> not Political(x))\n\nnot Flight(torre, ashlee)\n\nFlight(torre, dorthea) and forall x (Flight(x, dorthea) -> Socialize(x, ashlee)) -> therefore Socialize(torre, ashlee) Socialize(torre, ashlee) and Ostracise(ashlee, dorthea) and forall x (Socialize(x, ashlee) and Ostracise(ashlee, dorthea) -> Socialize(ashlee, torre)) -> therefore Socialize(ashlee, torre) Socialize(ashlee, torre) and forall x (Socialize(x, torre) -> Flight(torre, ashlee)) -> therefore Flight(torre, ashlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The dacie declaim the eolanda. The zara declaim the dacie. The thain sizz the dacie. The eolanda declaim the dacie. If someone aver the eolanda and the eolanda declaim the dacie then the eolanda aver the thain. If someone aver the thain then the thain sizz the eolanda. If someone sizz the eolanda and the eolanda sizz the thain then the eolanda declaim the thain. If someone sizz the dacie then they like the eolanda. If someone declaim the zara then they like the eolanda. If someone declaim the eolanda then they eat the thain. If someone declaim the thain and the thain does not like the zara then the zara declaim the dacie. All plumaged people are not balzacian. The dacie does not like the eolanda.", "logic": "\nDeclaim(dacie, eolanda)\nDeclaim(zara, dacie)\nSizz(thain, dacie)\nDeclaim(eolanda, dacie)\nforall x (Aver(x, eolanda) and Declaim(eolanda, dacie) -> Aver(eolanda, thain))\nforall x (Aver(x, thain) -> Sizz(thain, eolanda))\nforall x (Sizz(x, eolanda) and Sizz(eolanda, thain) -> Declaim(eolanda, thain))\nforall x (Sizz(x, dacie) -> Aver(x, eolanda))\nforall x (Declaim(x, zara) -> Aver(x, eolanda))\nforall x (Declaim(x, eolanda) -> Sizz(x, thain))\nforall x (Declaim(x, thain) and not Aver(thain, zara) -> Declaim(zara, dacie))\nforall x (Plumaged(x) -> not Balzacian(x))\n\nnot Aver(dacie, eolanda)\n\nforall x (Sizz(x, dacie) -> Aver(x, eolanda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The alecia applique the madelena. The emil applique the alecia. The marion disrupt the alecia. The madelena applique the alecia. If someone systemize the madelena and the madelena applique the alecia then the madelena systemize the marion. If someone systemize the marion then the marion disrupt the madelena. If someone disrupt the madelena and the madelena disrupt the marion then the madelena applique the marion. If someone disrupt the alecia then they like the madelena. If someone applique the emil then they like the madelena. If someone applique the madelena then they eat the marion. If someone applique the marion and the marion does not like the emil then the emil applique the alecia. All wheaten people are not verified. The madelena applique the marion.", "logic": "\nApplique(alecia, madelena)\nApplique(emil, alecia)\nDisrupt(marion, alecia)\nApplique(madelena, alecia)\nforall x (Systemize(x, madelena) and Applique(madelena, alecia) -> Systemize(madelena, marion))\nforall x (Systemize(x, marion) -> Disrupt(marion, madelena))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, madelena) and Disrupt(madelena, marion) -> Applique(madelena, marion))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, alecia) -> Systemize(x, madelena))\nforall x (Applique(x, emil) -> Systemize(x, madelena))\nforall x (Applique(x, madelena) -> Disrupt(x, marion))\nforall x (Applique(x, marion) and not Systemize(marion, emil) -> Applique(emil, alecia))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) -> not Verified(x))\n\nApplique(madelena, marion)\n\nforall x (Disrupt(x, madelena) and Disrupt(madelena, marion) -> Applique(madelena, marion)) <- forall x (Applique(x, madelena) -> Disrupt(x, marion)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The durante shunt the billy. The horatia shunt the durante. The anja sonnet the durante. The billy shunt the durante. If someone detain the billy and the billy shunt the durante then the billy detain the anja. If someone detain the anja then the anja sonnet the billy. If someone sonnet the billy and the billy sonnet the anja then the billy shunt the anja. If someone sonnet the durante then they like the billy. If someone shunt the horatia then they like the billy. If someone shunt the billy then they eat the anja. If someone shunt the anja and the anja does not like the horatia then the horatia shunt the durante. All struggling people are not homesick. The horatia does not like the billy.", "logic": "\nShunt(durante, billy)\nShunt(horatia, durante)\nSonnet(anja, durante)\nShunt(billy, durante)\nforall x (Detain(x, billy) and Shunt(billy, durante) -> Detain(billy, anja))\nforall x (Detain(x, anja) -> Sonnet(anja, billy))\nforall x (Sonnet(x, billy) and Sonnet(billy, anja) -> Shunt(billy, anja))\nforall x (Sonnet(x, durante) -> Detain(x, billy))\nforall x (Shunt(x, horatia) -> Detain(x, billy))\nforall x (Shunt(x, billy) -> Sonnet(x, anja))\nforall x (Shunt(x, anja) and not Detain(anja, horatia) -> Shunt(horatia, durante))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> not Homesick(x))\n\nnot Detain(horatia, billy)\n\nforall x (Sonnet(x, durante) -> Detain(x, billy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The lucy demean the paolo. The ruth demean the lucy. The willette tittup the lucy. The paolo demean the lucy. If someone caption the paolo and the paolo demean the lucy then the paolo caption the willette. If someone caption the willette then the willette tittup the paolo. If someone tittup the paolo and the paolo tittup the willette then the paolo demean the willette. If someone tittup the lucy then they like the paolo. If someone demean the ruth then they like the paolo. If someone demean the paolo then they eat the willette. If someone demean the willette and the willette does not like the ruth then the ruth demean the lucy. All retired people are not garmented. The paolo tittup the willette.", "logic": "\nDemean(lucy, paolo)\nDemean(ruth, lucy)\nTittup(willette, lucy)\nDemean(paolo, lucy)\nforall x (Caption(x, paolo) and Demean(paolo, lucy) -> Caption(paolo, willette))\nforall x (Caption(x, willette) -> Tittup(willette, paolo))\nforall x (Tittup(x, paolo) and Tittup(paolo, willette) -> Demean(paolo, willette))\nforall x (Tittup(x, lucy) -> Caption(x, paolo))\nforall x (Demean(x, ruth) -> Caption(x, paolo))\nforall x (Demean(x, paolo) -> Tittup(x, willette))\nforall x (Demean(x, willette) and not Caption(willette, ruth) -> Demean(ruth, lucy))\nforall x (Retired(x) -> not Garmented(x))\n\nTittup(paolo, willette)\n\nforall x (Demean(x, paolo) -> Tittup(x, willette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The donetta despoil the tracee. The kevan despoil the donetta. The darleen engorge the donetta. The tracee despoil the donetta. If someone contuse the tracee and the tracee despoil the donetta then the tracee contuse the darleen. If someone contuse the darleen then the darleen engorge the tracee. If someone engorge the tracee and the tracee engorge the darleen then the tracee despoil the darleen. If someone engorge the donetta then they like the tracee. If someone despoil the kevan then they like the tracee. If someone despoil the tracee then they eat the darleen. If someone despoil the darleen and the darleen does not like the kevan then the kevan despoil the donetta. All nominal people are not chafed. The donetta is not cold.", "logic": "\nDespoil(donetta, tracee)\nDespoil(kevan, donetta)\nEngorge(darleen, donetta)\nDespoil(tracee, donetta)\nforall x (Contuse(x, tracee) and Despoil(tracee, donetta) -> Contuse(tracee, darleen))\nforall x (Contuse(x, darleen) -> Engorge(darleen, tracee))\nforall x (Engorge(x, tracee) and Engorge(tracee, darleen) -> Despoil(tracee, darleen))\nforall x (Engorge(x, donetta) -> Contuse(x, tracee))\nforall x (Despoil(x, kevan) -> Contuse(x, tracee))\nforall x (Despoil(x, tracee) -> Engorge(x, darleen))\nforall x (Despoil(x, darleen) and not Contuse(darleen, kevan) -> Despoil(kevan, donetta))\nforall x (Nominal(x) -> not Chafed(x))\n\nnot Cold(donetta)\n\nnot Cold(donetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The reuven race the shawnee. The irene race the reuven. The avrom cinematize the reuven. The shawnee race the reuven. If someone squander the shawnee and the shawnee race the reuven then the shawnee squander the avrom. If someone squander the avrom then the avrom cinematize the shawnee. If someone cinematize the shawnee and the shawnee cinematize the avrom then the shawnee race the avrom. If someone cinematize the reuven then they like the shawnee. If someone race the irene then they like the shawnee. If someone race the shawnee then they eat the avrom. If someone race the avrom and the avrom does not like the irene then the irene race the reuven. All revelatory people are not finer. The irene race the irene.", "logic": "\nRace(reuven, shawnee)\nRace(irene, reuven)\nCinematize(avrom, reuven)\nRace(shawnee, reuven)\nforall x (Squander(x, shawnee) and Race(shawnee, reuven) -> Squander(shawnee, avrom))\nforall x (Squander(x, avrom) -> Cinematize(avrom, shawnee))\nforall x (Cinematize(x, shawnee) and Cinematize(shawnee, avrom) -> Race(shawnee, avrom))\nforall x (Cinematize(x, reuven) -> Squander(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Race(x, irene) -> Squander(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Race(x, shawnee) -> Cinematize(x, avrom))\nforall x (Race(x, avrom) and not Squander(avrom, irene) -> Race(irene, reuven))\nforall x (Revelatory(x) -> not Finer(x))\n\nRace(irene, irene)\n\nRace(irene, irene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The minerva solidify the cher. The dorie solidify the minerva. The standford calcify the minerva. The cher solidify the minerva. If someone topicalize the cher and the cher solidify the minerva then the cher topicalize the standford. If someone topicalize the standford then the standford calcify the cher. If someone calcify the cher and the cher calcify the standford then the cher solidify the standford. If someone calcify the minerva then they like the cher. If someone solidify the dorie then they like the cher. If someone solidify the cher then they eat the standford. If someone solidify the standford and the standford does not like the dorie then the dorie solidify the minerva. All sheepish people are not unhealed. The cher is not sheepish.", "logic": "\nSolidify(minerva, cher)\nSolidify(dorie, minerva)\nCalcify(standford, minerva)\nSolidify(cher, minerva)\nforall x (Topicalize(x, cher) and Solidify(cher, minerva) -> Topicalize(cher, standford))\nforall x (Topicalize(x, standford) -> Calcify(standford, cher))\nforall x (Calcify(x, cher) and Calcify(cher, standford) -> Solidify(cher, standford))\nforall x (Calcify(x, minerva) -> Topicalize(x, cher))\nforall x (Solidify(x, dorie) -> Topicalize(x, cher))\nforall x (Solidify(x, cher) -> Calcify(x, standford))\nforall x (Solidify(x, standford) and not Topicalize(standford, dorie) -> Solidify(dorie, minerva))\nforall x (Sheepish(x) -> not Unhealed(x))\n\nnot Sheepish(cher)\n\nnot Sheepish(cher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The tonia inveigle the lazare. The carmella inveigle the tonia. The stephanus collar the tonia. The lazare inveigle the tonia. If someone outplay the lazare and the lazare inveigle the tonia then the lazare outplay the stephanus. If someone outplay the stephanus then the stephanus collar the lazare. If someone collar the lazare and the lazare collar the stephanus then the lazare inveigle the stephanus. If someone collar the tonia then they like the lazare. If someone inveigle the carmella then they like the lazare. If someone inveigle the lazare then they eat the stephanus. If someone inveigle the stephanus and the stephanus does not like the carmella then the carmella inveigle the tonia. All ghostly people are not bivalved. The carmella inveigle the stephanus.", "logic": "\nInveigle(tonia, lazare)\nInveigle(carmella, tonia)\nCollar(stephanus, tonia)\nInveigle(lazare, tonia)\nforall x (Outplay(x, lazare) and Inveigle(lazare, tonia) -> Outplay(lazare, stephanus))\nforall x (Outplay(x, stephanus) -> Collar(stephanus, lazare))\nforall x (Collar(x, lazare) and Collar(lazare, stephanus) -> Inveigle(lazare, stephanus))\nforall x (Collar(x, tonia) -> Outplay(x, lazare))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, carmella) -> Outplay(x, lazare))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, lazare) -> Collar(x, stephanus))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, stephanus) and not Outplay(stephanus, carmella) -> Inveigle(carmella, tonia))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> not Bivalved(x))\n\nInveigle(carmella, stephanus)\n\nInveigle(carmella, stephanus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "Ned is casteless. Cicily is nitwitted. Patrica is wanton. Young, zillion things are casteless. All nitwitted things are marginal. If something is marginal then it is casteless. Young, casteless things are wingless. If Ned is nitwitted and Ned is casteless then Ned is zillion. All nitwitted things are zillion. All nitwitted, wingless things are wanton. If something is zillion and marginal then it is oversexed. Ned is casteless.", "logic": "\nCasteless(ned)\nNitwitted(cicily)\nWanton(patrica)\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) and Zillion(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) and Casteless(x) -> Wingless(x))\nNitwitted(ned) and Casteless(ned) -> Zillion(ned)\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Zillion(x))\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) and Wingless(x) -> Wanton(x))\nforall x (Zillion(x) and Marginal(x) -> Oversexed(x))\n\nCasteless(ned)\n\ntherefore Casteless(ned)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Trixie is deuced. Ardeen is pressor. Skipper is xxxvi. Young, microbial things are deuced. All pressor things are thrillful. If something is thrillful then it is deuced. Young, deuced things are submissive. If Trixie is pressor and Trixie is deuced then Trixie is microbial. All pressor things are microbial. All pressor, submissive things are xxxvi. If something is microbial and thrillful then it is cursed. Trixie is not deuced.", "logic": "\nDeuced(trixie)\nPressor(ardeen)\nXxxvi(skipper)\nforall x (Pressor(x) and Microbial(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Pressor(x) -> Thrillful(x))\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Pressor(x) and Deuced(x) -> Submissive(x))\nPressor(trixie) and Deuced(trixie) -> Microbial(trixie)\nforall x (Pressor(x) -> Microbial(x))\nforall x (Pressor(x) and Submissive(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nforall x (Microbial(x) and Thrillful(x) -> Cursed(x))\n\nnot Deuced(trixie)\n\ntherefore Deuced(trixie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Prescott is underhung. Collette is passe. Virginie is obvious. Young, faced things are underhung. All passe things are unjust. If something is unjust then it is underhung. Young, underhung things are dazzling. If Prescott is passe and Prescott is underhung then Prescott is faced. All passe things are faced. All passe, dazzling things are obvious. If something is faced and unjust then it is outlaw. Collette is unjust.", "logic": "\nUnderhung(prescott)\nPasse(collette)\nObvious(virginie)\nforall x (Passe(x) and Faced(x) -> Underhung(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) -> Unjust(x))\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Underhung(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) and Underhung(x) -> Dazzling(x))\nPasse(prescott) and Underhung(prescott) -> Faced(prescott)\nforall x (Passe(x) -> Faced(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) and Dazzling(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Faced(x) and Unjust(x) -> Outlaw(x))\n\nUnjust(collette)\n\nPasse(collette) and forall x (Passe(x) -> Unjust(x)) -> therefore Unjust(collette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Cyrus is none. Lani is futureless. Glennie is furious. Young, denatured things are none. All futureless things are inapposite. If something is inapposite then it is none. Young, none things are rectal. If Cyrus is futureless and Cyrus is none then Cyrus is denatured. All futureless things are denatured. All futureless, rectal things are furious. If something is denatured and inapposite then it is exempt. Lani is not inapposite.", "logic": "\nNone(cyrus)\nFutureless(lani)\nFurious(glennie)\nforall x (Futureless(x) and Denatured(x) -> None(x))\nforall x (Futureless(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Inapposite(x) -> None(x))\nforall x (Futureless(x) and None(x) -> Rectal(x))\nFutureless(cyrus) and None(cyrus) -> Denatured(cyrus)\nforall x (Futureless(x) -> Denatured(x))\nforall x (Futureless(x) and Rectal(x) -> Furious(x))\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Inapposite(x) -> Exempt(x))\n\nnot Inapposite(lani)\n\nFutureless(lani) and forall x (Futureless(x) -> Inapposite(x)) -> therefore Inapposite(lani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Garwood is tufted. Hayley is unmated. Sela is discrete. Young, kampuchean things are tufted. All unmated things are briary. If something is briary then it is tufted. Young, tufted things are eolithic. If Garwood is unmated and Garwood is tufted then Garwood is kampuchean. All unmated things are kampuchean. All unmated, eolithic things are discrete. If something is kampuchean and briary then it is pupal. Hayley is tufted.", "logic": "\nTufted(garwood)\nUnmated(hayley)\nDiscrete(sela)\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Kampuchean(x) -> Tufted(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) -> Briary(x))\nforall x (Briary(x) -> Tufted(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Tufted(x) -> Eolithic(x))\nUnmated(garwood) and Tufted(garwood) -> Kampuchean(garwood)\nforall x (Unmated(x) -> Kampuchean(x))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Eolithic(x) -> Discrete(x))\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) and Briary(x) -> Pupal(x))\n\nTufted(hayley)\n\nUnmated(hayley) and forall x (Unmated(x) -> Briary(x)) -> therefore Briary(hayley) Briary(hayley) and forall x (Briary(x) -> Tufted(x)) -> therefore Tufted(hayley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Gena is satirical. Abagael is seventieth. Aristotle is palpitant. Young, hourly things are satirical. All seventieth things are amiable. If something is amiable then it is satirical. Young, satirical things are overfed. If Gena is seventieth and Gena is satirical then Gena is hourly. All seventieth things are hourly. All seventieth, overfed things are palpitant. If something is hourly and amiable then it is inedible. Abagael is not inedible.", "logic": "\nSatirical(gena)\nSeventieth(abagael)\nPalpitant(aristotle)\nforall x (Seventieth(x) and Hourly(x) -> Satirical(x))\nforall x (Seventieth(x) -> Amiable(x))\nforall x (Amiable(x) -> Satirical(x))\nforall x (Seventieth(x) and Satirical(x) -> Overfed(x))\nSeventieth(gena) and Satirical(gena) -> Hourly(gena)\nforall x (Seventieth(x) -> Hourly(x))\nforall x (Seventieth(x) and Overfed(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Hourly(x) and Amiable(x) -> Inedible(x))\n\nnot Inedible(abagael)\n\nSeventieth(abagael) and forall x (Seventieth(x) -> Hourly(x)) -> therefore Hourly(abagael) Seventieth(abagael) and forall x (Seventieth(x) -> Amiable(x)) -> therefore Amiable(abagael) Hourly(abagael) and Amiable(abagael) and forall x (Hourly(x) and Amiable(x) -> Inedible(x)) -> therefore Inedible(abagael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Bernie is clanging. Delcina is allopatric. Larry is guardant. Young, anagogical things are clanging. All allopatric things are bladed. If something is bladed then it is clanging. Young, clanging things are discerning. If Bernie is allopatric and Bernie is clanging then Bernie is anagogical. All allopatric things are anagogical. All allopatric, discerning things are guardant. If something is anagogical and bladed then it is engrossing. Delcina is discerning.", "logic": "\nClanging(bernie)\nAllopatric(delcina)\nGuardant(larry)\nforall x (Allopatric(x) and Anagogical(x) -> Clanging(x))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) -> Bladed(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) -> Clanging(x))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) and Clanging(x) -> Discerning(x))\nAllopatric(bernie) and Clanging(bernie) -> Anagogical(bernie)\nforall x (Allopatric(x) -> Anagogical(x))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) and Discerning(x) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Anagogical(x) and Bladed(x) -> Engrossing(x))\n\nDiscerning(delcina)\n\nAllopatric(delcina) and forall x (Allopatric(x) -> Bladed(x)) -> therefore Bladed(delcina) Bladed(delcina) and forall x (Bladed(x) -> Clanging(x)) -> therefore Clanging(delcina) Allopatric(delcina) and Clanging(delcina) and forall x (Allopatric(x) and Clanging(x) -> Discerning(x)) -> therefore Discerning(delcina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Orsa is unthematic. Isaac is contextual. Jan is chaldee. Young, critical things are unthematic. All contextual things are listless. If something is listless then it is unthematic. Young, unthematic things are sodden. If Orsa is contextual and Orsa is unthematic then Orsa is critical. All contextual things are critical. All contextual, sodden things are chaldee. If something is critical and listless then it is passing. Isaac is not sodden.", "logic": "\nUnthematic(orsa)\nContextual(isaac)\nChaldee(jan)\nforall x (Contextual(x) and Critical(x) -> Unthematic(x))\nforall x (Contextual(x) -> Listless(x))\nforall x (Listless(x) -> Unthematic(x))\nforall x (Contextual(x) and Unthematic(x) -> Sodden(x))\nContextual(orsa) and Unthematic(orsa) -> Critical(orsa)\nforall x (Contextual(x) -> Critical(x))\nforall x (Contextual(x) and Sodden(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Critical(x) and Listless(x) -> Passing(x))\n\nnot Sodden(isaac)\n\nContextual(isaac) and forall x (Contextual(x) -> Listless(x)) -> therefore Listless(isaac) Listless(isaac) and forall x (Listless(x) -> Unthematic(x)) -> therefore Unthematic(isaac) Contextual(isaac) and Unthematic(isaac) and forall x (Contextual(x) and Unthematic(x) -> Sodden(x)) -> therefore Sodden(isaac)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Mabel is undesiring. Joyce is rectal. Perceval is euphoriant. Young, arrhythmic things are undesiring. All rectal things are declarable. If something is declarable then it is undesiring. Young, undesiring things are neglected. If Mabel is rectal and Mabel is undesiring then Mabel is arrhythmic. All rectal things are arrhythmic. All rectal, neglected things are euphoriant. If something is arrhythmic and declarable then it is unsettled. Perceval is not unsettled.", "logic": "\nUndesiring(mabel)\nRectal(joyce)\nEuphoriant(perceval)\nforall x (Rectal(x) and Arrhythmic(x) -> Undesiring(x))\nforall x (Rectal(x) -> Declarable(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Undesiring(x))\nforall x (Rectal(x) and Undesiring(x) -> Neglected(x))\nRectal(mabel) and Undesiring(mabel) -> Arrhythmic(mabel)\nforall x (Rectal(x) -> Arrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Rectal(x) and Neglected(x) -> Euphoriant(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) and Declarable(x) -> Unsettled(x))\n\nnot Unsettled(perceval)\n\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) and Declarable(x) -> Unsettled(x)) <- forall x (Rectal(x) -> Arrhythmic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Lorena is azonal. Christian is indulgent. Kerri is categoric. Young, extricable things are azonal. All indulgent things are ahorseback. If something is ahorseback then it is azonal. Young, azonal things are colonnaded. If Lorena is indulgent and Lorena is azonal then Lorena is extricable. All indulgent things are extricable. All indulgent, colonnaded things are categoric. If something is extricable and ahorseback then it is hieratical. Kerri is colonnaded.", "logic": "\nAzonal(lorena)\nIndulgent(christian)\nCategoric(kerri)\nforall x (Indulgent(x) and Extricable(x) -> Azonal(x))\nforall x (Indulgent(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> Azonal(x))\nforall x (Indulgent(x) and Azonal(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\nIndulgent(lorena) and Azonal(lorena) -> Extricable(lorena)\nforall x (Indulgent(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Indulgent(x) and Colonnaded(x) -> Categoric(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and Ahorseback(x) -> Hieratical(x))\n\nColonnaded(kerri)\n\nforall x (Indulgent(x) and Azonal(x) -> Colonnaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Jillie is consumable. Tonie is lofty. Ebenezer is mineral. Young, assertive things are consumable. All lofty things are airy. If something is airy then it is consumable. Young, consumable things are largish. If Jillie is lofty and Jillie is consumable then Jillie is assertive. All lofty things are assertive. All lofty, largish things are mineral. If something is assertive and airy then it is untoasted. Jillie is not airy.", "logic": "\nConsumable(jillie)\nLofty(tonie)\nMineral(ebenezer)\nforall x (Lofty(x) and Assertive(x) -> Consumable(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Airy(x))\nforall x (Airy(x) -> Consumable(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) and Consumable(x) -> Largish(x))\nLofty(jillie) and Consumable(jillie) -> Assertive(jillie)\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Assertive(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) and Largish(x) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) and Airy(x) -> Untoasted(x))\n\nnot Airy(jillie)\n\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Airy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Michell is mosstone. Kamilah is surreal. Ara is xenophobic. Young, bedaubed things are mosstone. All surreal things are anhydrous. If something is anhydrous then it is mosstone. Young, mosstone things are nutrient. If Michell is surreal and Michell is mosstone then Michell is bedaubed. All surreal things are bedaubed. All surreal, nutrient things are xenophobic. If something is bedaubed and anhydrous then it is untempting. Ara is mosstone.", "logic": "\nMosstone(michell)\nSurreal(kamilah)\nXenophobic(ara)\nforall x (Surreal(x) and Bedaubed(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\nforall x (Anhydrous(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) and Mosstone(x) -> Nutrient(x))\nSurreal(michell) and Mosstone(michell) -> Bedaubed(michell)\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) and Nutrient(x) -> Xenophobic(x))\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) and Anhydrous(x) -> Untempting(x))\n\nMosstone(ara)\n\nforall x (Anhydrous(x) -> Mosstone(x)) <- forall x (Surreal(x) -> Anhydrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Lynde is together. Randi is governable. Greg is normative. Young, coppery things are together. All governable things are gilded. If something is gilded then it is together. Young, together things are revised. If Lynde is governable and Lynde is together then Lynde is coppery. All governable things are coppery. All governable, revised things are normative. If something is coppery and gilded then it is subsidized. Lynde is not governable.", "logic": "\nTogether(lynde)\nGovernable(randi)\nNormative(greg)\nforall x (Governable(x) and Coppery(x) -> Together(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) -> Gilded(x))\nforall x (Gilded(x) -> Together(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) and Together(x) -> Revised(x))\nGovernable(lynde) and Together(lynde) -> Coppery(lynde)\nforall x (Governable(x) -> Coppery(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) and Revised(x) -> Normative(x))\nforall x (Coppery(x) and Gilded(x) -> Subsidized(x))\n\nnot Governable(lynde)\n\nnot Governable(lynde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Audrey is geocentric. Bryant is cadaveric. Julio is disarrayed. Young, pelecypod things are geocentric. All cadaveric things are whatever. If something is whatever then it is geocentric. Young, geocentric things are awkward. If Audrey is cadaveric and Audrey is geocentric then Audrey is pelecypod. All cadaveric things are pelecypod. All cadaveric, awkward things are disarrayed. If something is pelecypod and whatever then it is joyous. Julio is cadaveric.", "logic": "\nGeocentric(audrey)\nCadaveric(bryant)\nDisarrayed(julio)\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) and Pelecypod(x) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) -> Whatever(x))\nforall x (Whatever(x) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) and Geocentric(x) -> Awkward(x))\nCadaveric(audrey) and Geocentric(audrey) -> Pelecypod(audrey)\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) -> Pelecypod(x))\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) and Awkward(x) -> Disarrayed(x))\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) and Whatever(x) -> Joyous(x))\n\nCadaveric(julio)\n\nCadaveric(julio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Damian is hearing. Clarisse is boon. Modesta is crustlike. Blue people are epithelial. If someone is hearing then they are exulting. All exulting people are hearing. If someone is hearing and boon then they are unfilmed. If someone is crustlike and unfilmed then they are blowy. All boon people are exulting. If someone is epithelial then they are hearing. All epithelial, boon people are crustlike. Clarisse is boon.", "logic": "\nHearing(damian)\nBoon(clarisse)\nCrustlike(modesta)\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) and Boon(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\nforall x (Crustlike(x) and Unfilmed(x) -> Blowy(x))\nforall x (Boon(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Epithelial(x) and Boon(x) -> Crustlike(x))\n\nBoon(clarisse)\n\ntherefore Boon(clarisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Kynthia is windy. Mort is nonelected. Marin is drowsy. Blue people are princely. If someone is windy then they are propellent. All propellent people are windy. If someone is windy and nonelected then they are offbeat. If someone is drowsy and offbeat then they are ropy. All nonelected people are propellent. If someone is princely then they are windy. All princely, nonelected people are drowsy. Mort is not nonelected.", "logic": "\nWindy(kynthia)\nNonelected(mort)\nDrowsy(marin)\nforall x (Propellent(x) -> Princely(x))\nforall x (Windy(x) -> Propellent(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Windy(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) and Offbeat(x) -> Ropy(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) -> Propellent(x))\nforall x (Princely(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Princely(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Drowsy(x))\n\nnot Nonelected(mort)\n\ntherefore Nonelected(mort)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Carolie is westerly. Kimmi is edited. Doralynn is mouthlike. Blue people are impetuous. If someone is westerly then they are alveolate. All alveolate people are westerly. If someone is westerly and edited then they are appareled. If someone is mouthlike and appareled then they are empty. All edited people are alveolate. If someone is impetuous then they are westerly. All impetuous, edited people are mouthlike. Kimmi is alveolate.", "logic": "\nWesterly(carolie)\nEdited(kimmi)\nMouthlike(doralynn)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Westerly(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Alveolate(x) -> Westerly(x))\nforall x (Westerly(x) and Edited(x) -> Appareled(x))\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) and Appareled(x) -> Empty(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) -> Westerly(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and Edited(x) -> Mouthlike(x))\n\nAlveolate(kimmi)\n\nEdited(kimmi) and forall x (Edited(x) -> Alveolate(x)) -> therefore Alveolate(kimmi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Tanya is electronic. Tommi is unmelted. Kiri is anestric. Blue people are jamesian. If someone is electronic then they are amerindic. All amerindic people are electronic. If someone is electronic and unmelted then they are laudable. If someone is anestric and laudable then they are ameboid. All unmelted people are amerindic. If someone is jamesian then they are electronic. All jamesian, unmelted people are anestric. Tommi is not amerindic.", "logic": "\nElectronic(tanya)\nUnmelted(tommi)\nAnestric(kiri)\nforall x (Amerindic(x) -> Jamesian(x))\nforall x (Electronic(x) -> Amerindic(x))\nforall x (Amerindic(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Electronic(x) and Unmelted(x) -> Laudable(x))\nforall x (Anestric(x) and Laudable(x) -> Ameboid(x))\nforall x (Unmelted(x) -> Amerindic(x))\nforall x (Jamesian(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Jamesian(x) and Unmelted(x) -> Anestric(x))\n\nnot Amerindic(tommi)\n\nUnmelted(tommi) and forall x (Unmelted(x) -> Amerindic(x)) -> therefore Amerindic(tommi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Frank is gauche. Ingaborg is hagridden. Danya is ecumenic. Blue people are sedative. If someone is gauche then they are nasty. All nasty people are gauche. If someone is gauche and hagridden then they are classic. If someone is ecumenic and classic then they are mythic. All hagridden people are nasty. If someone is sedative then they are gauche. All sedative, hagridden people are ecumenic. Ingaborg is gauche.", "logic": "\nGauche(frank)\nHagridden(ingaborg)\nEcumenic(danya)\nforall x (Nasty(x) -> Sedative(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Nasty(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Hagridden(x) -> Classic(x))\nforall x (Ecumenic(x) and Classic(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Hagridden(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) and Hagridden(x) -> Ecumenic(x))\n\nGauche(ingaborg)\n\nHagridden(ingaborg) and forall x (Hagridden(x) -> Nasty(x)) -> therefore Nasty(ingaborg) Nasty(ingaborg) and forall x (Nasty(x) -> Gauche(x)) -> therefore Gauche(ingaborg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Janella is camp. Cordelie is untimely. Marj is evacuant. Blue people are grim. If someone is camp then they are suffering. All suffering people are camp. If someone is camp and untimely then they are banal. If someone is evacuant and banal then they are resonating. All untimely people are suffering. If someone is grim then they are camp. All grim, untimely people are evacuant. Cordelie is not camp.", "logic": "\nCamp(janella)\nUntimely(cordelie)\nEvacuant(marj)\nforall x (Suffering(x) -> Grim(x))\nforall x (Camp(x) -> Suffering(x))\nforall x (Suffering(x) -> Camp(x))\nforall x (Camp(x) and Untimely(x) -> Banal(x))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) and Banal(x) -> Resonating(x))\nforall x (Untimely(x) -> Suffering(x))\nforall x (Grim(x) -> Camp(x))\nforall x (Grim(x) and Untimely(x) -> Evacuant(x))\n\nnot Camp(cordelie)\n\nUntimely(cordelie) and forall x (Untimely(x) -> Suffering(x)) -> therefore Suffering(cordelie) Suffering(cordelie) and forall x (Suffering(x) -> Camp(x)) -> therefore Camp(cordelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Aubrie is presumable. Bren is boreal. Rosemary is fifth. Blue people are sporty. If someone is presumable then they are irreverent. All irreverent people are presumable. If someone is presumable and boreal then they are repeatable. If someone is fifth and repeatable then they are frantic. All boreal people are irreverent. If someone is sporty then they are presumable. All sporty, boreal people are fifth. Bren is fifth.", "logic": "\nPresumable(aubrie)\nBoreal(bren)\nFifth(rosemary)\nforall x (Irreverent(x) -> Sporty(x))\nforall x (Presumable(x) -> Irreverent(x))\nforall x (Irreverent(x) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Presumable(x) and Boreal(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Fifth(x) and Repeatable(x) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Boreal(x) -> Irreverent(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) and Boreal(x) -> Fifth(x))\n\nFifth(bren)\n\nBoreal(bren) and forall x (Boreal(x) -> Irreverent(x)) -> therefore Irreverent(bren) Irreverent(bren) and forall x (Irreverent(x) -> Sporty(x)) -> therefore Sporty(bren) Sporty(bren) and Boreal(bren) and forall x (Sporty(x) and Boreal(x) -> Fifth(x)) -> therefore Fifth(bren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Quincey is meddling. Sharna is mural. Wallas is pleochroic. Blue people are vulval. If someone is meddling then they are mediated. All mediated people are meddling. If someone is meddling and mural then they are inerrant. If someone is pleochroic and inerrant then they are witless. All mural people are mediated. If someone is vulval then they are meddling. All vulval, mural people are pleochroic. Sharna is not inerrant.", "logic": "\nMeddling(quincey)\nMural(sharna)\nPleochroic(wallas)\nforall x (Mediated(x) -> Vulval(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Mediated(x) -> Meddling(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and Mural(x) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Inerrant(x) -> Witless(x))\nforall x (Mural(x) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Vulval(x) -> Meddling(x))\nforall x (Vulval(x) and Mural(x) -> Pleochroic(x))\n\nnot Inerrant(sharna)\n\nMural(sharna) and forall x (Mural(x) -> Mediated(x)) -> therefore Mediated(sharna) Mediated(sharna) and forall x (Mediated(x) -> Meddling(x)) -> therefore Meddling(sharna) Meddling(sharna) and Mural(sharna) and forall x (Meddling(x) and Mural(x) -> Inerrant(x)) -> therefore Inerrant(sharna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Jacquetta is lascivious. Gillie is leading. Rozanne is annulated. Blue people are ironical. If someone is lascivious then they are prototypal. All prototypal people are lascivious. If someone is lascivious and leading then they are superhuman. If someone is annulated and superhuman then they are anapaestic. All leading people are prototypal. If someone is ironical then they are lascivious. All ironical, leading people are annulated. Rozanne is not prototypal.", "logic": "\nLascivious(jacquetta)\nLeading(gillie)\nAnnulated(rozanne)\nforall x (Prototypal(x) -> Ironical(x))\nforall x (Lascivious(x) -> Prototypal(x))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nforall x (Lascivious(x) and Leading(x) -> Superhuman(x))\nforall x (Annulated(x) and Superhuman(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) -> Prototypal(x))\nforall x (Ironical(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nforall x (Ironical(x) and Leading(x) -> Annulated(x))\n\nnot Prototypal(rozanne)\n\nforall x (Lascivious(x) -> Prototypal(x)) <- forall x (Ironical(x) -> Lascivious(x)) <- forall x (Prototypal(x) -> Ironical(x)) <- forall x (Leading(x) -> Prototypal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Kurt is humanlike. Aldis is grumous. Ursuline is purblind. Blue people are stingless. If someone is humanlike then they are affixed. All affixed people are humanlike. If someone is humanlike and grumous then they are subarctic. If someone is purblind and subarctic then they are upcountry. All grumous people are affixed. If someone is stingless then they are humanlike. All stingless, grumous people are purblind. Ursuline is subarctic.", "logic": "\nHumanlike(kurt)\nGrumous(aldis)\nPurblind(ursuline)\nforall x (Affixed(x) -> Stingless(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Affixed(x) -> Humanlike(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) and Grumous(x) -> Subarctic(x))\nforall x (Purblind(x) and Subarctic(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Grumous(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Stingless(x) -> Humanlike(x))\nforall x (Stingless(x) and Grumous(x) -> Purblind(x))\n\nSubarctic(ursuline)\n\nforall x (Humanlike(x) and Grumous(x) -> Subarctic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Chaddy is vaporized. Georgine is superfine. Alisa is raging. Blue people are omniscient. If someone is vaporized then they are taupe. All taupe people are vaporized. If someone is vaporized and superfine then they are outback. If someone is raging and outback then they are cryonic. All superfine people are taupe. If someone is omniscient then they are vaporized. All omniscient, superfine people are raging. Chaddy is not cryonic.", "logic": "\nVaporized(chaddy)\nSuperfine(georgine)\nRaging(alisa)\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) -> Taupe(x))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and Superfine(x) -> Outback(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) and Outback(x) -> Cryonic(x))\nforall x (Superfine(x) -> Taupe(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) and Superfine(x) -> Raging(x))\n\nnot Cryonic(chaddy)\n\nforall x (Raging(x) and Outback(x) -> Cryonic(x)) <- forall x (Omniscient(x) and Superfine(x) -> Raging(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Vincents is unmalted. Phelia is chartreuse. Simonne is peanut. Blue people are missed. If someone is unmalted then they are monestrous. All monestrous people are unmalted. If someone is unmalted and chartreuse then they are tensile. If someone is peanut and tensile then they are affirmable. All chartreuse people are monestrous. If someone is missed then they are unmalted. All missed, chartreuse people are peanut. Simonne is missed.", "logic": "\nUnmalted(vincents)\nChartreuse(phelia)\nPeanut(simonne)\nforall x (Monestrous(x) -> Missed(x))\nforall x (Unmalted(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Monestrous(x) -> Unmalted(x))\nforall x (Unmalted(x) and Chartreuse(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) and Tensile(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Missed(x) -> Unmalted(x))\nforall x (Missed(x) and Chartreuse(x) -> Peanut(x))\n\nMissed(simonne)\n\nforall x (Monestrous(x) -> Missed(x)) <- forall x (Unmalted(x) -> Monestrous(x)) <- forall x (Monestrous(x) -> Unmalted(x)) <- forall x (Chartreuse(x) -> Monestrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Orelle is wormlike. Nettle is persian. Art is heavenward. Blue people are absorbable. If someone is wormlike then they are concessive. All concessive people are wormlike. If someone is wormlike and persian then they are grievous. If someone is heavenward and grievous then they are piano. All persian people are concessive. If someone is absorbable then they are wormlike. All absorbable, persian people are heavenward. Art is not persian.", "logic": "\nWormlike(orelle)\nPersian(nettle)\nHeavenward(art)\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> Absorbable(x))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> Wormlike(x))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) and Persian(x) -> Grievous(x))\nforall x (Heavenward(x) and Grievous(x) -> Piano(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Wormlike(x))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) and Persian(x) -> Heavenward(x))\n\nnot Persian(art)\n\nnot Persian(art) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Shaylyn is gobsmacked. Alan is uncaused. Stacy is xxiv. Blue people are eurasian. If someone is gobsmacked then they are postexilic. All postexilic people are gobsmacked. If someone is gobsmacked and uncaused then they are stoppered. If someone is xxiv and stoppered then they are antsy. All uncaused people are postexilic. If someone is eurasian then they are gobsmacked. All eurasian, uncaused people are xxiv. Shaylyn is uncaused.", "logic": "\nGobsmacked(shaylyn)\nUncaused(alan)\nXxiv(stacy)\nforall x (Postexilic(x) -> Eurasian(x))\nforall x (Gobsmacked(x) -> Postexilic(x))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) -> Gobsmacked(x))\nforall x (Gobsmacked(x) and Uncaused(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Xxiv(x) and Stoppered(x) -> Antsy(x))\nforall x (Uncaused(x) -> Postexilic(x))\nforall x (Eurasian(x) -> Gobsmacked(x))\nforall x (Eurasian(x) and Uncaused(x) -> Xxiv(x))\n\nUncaused(shaylyn)\n\nUncaused(shaylyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "The robena decease the jonell. The robena vacate the jonell. The robena is composite. The robena is oncologic. The robena is recessed. The robena queer the jonell. The jonell decease the robena. The jonell vacate the robena. The jonell is imperative. The jonell queer the robena. If something decease the robena and the robena queer the jonell then the jonell is geodesic. If something decease the jonell and the jonell vacate the robena then it vacate the jonell. If something is geodesic then it decease the jonell. The robena is recessed.", "logic": "\nDecease(robena, jonell)\nVacate(robena, jonell)\nComposite(robena)\nOncologic(robena)\nRecessed(robena)\nQueer(robena, jonell)\nDecease(jonell, robena)\nVacate(jonell, robena)\nImperative(jonell)\nQueer(jonell, robena)\nforall x (Decease(x, robena) and Queer(robena, jonell) -> Geodesic(jonell))\nforall x (Decease(x, jonell) and Vacate(jonell, robena) -> Vacate(x, jonell))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Decease(x, jonell))\n\nRecessed(robena)\n\ntherefore Recessed(robena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The johanna reef the sullivan. The johanna whop the sullivan. The johanna is beefy. The johanna is receptive. The johanna is neuronic. The johanna expire the sullivan. The sullivan reef the johanna. The sullivan whop the johanna. The sullivan is awheel. The sullivan expire the johanna. If something reef the johanna and the johanna expire the sullivan then the sullivan is antifungal. If something reef the sullivan and the sullivan whop the johanna then it whop the sullivan. If something is antifungal then it reef the sullivan. The johanna does not visit the sullivan.", "logic": "\nReef(johanna, sullivan)\nWhop(johanna, sullivan)\nBeefy(johanna)\nReceptive(johanna)\nNeuronic(johanna)\nExpire(johanna, sullivan)\nReef(sullivan, johanna)\nWhop(sullivan, johanna)\nAwheel(sullivan)\nExpire(sullivan, johanna)\nforall x (Reef(x, johanna) and Expire(johanna, sullivan) -> Antifungal(sullivan))\nforall x (Reef(x, sullivan) and Whop(sullivan, johanna) -> Whop(x, sullivan))\nforall x (Antifungal(x) -> Reef(x, sullivan))\n\nnot Expire(johanna, sullivan)\n\ntherefore Expire(johanna, sullivan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The grant scry the baldwin. The grant surfboard the baldwin. The grant is preferent. The grant is thickened. The grant is shuddering. The grant retrieve the baldwin. The baldwin scry the grant. The baldwin surfboard the grant. The baldwin is septuple. The baldwin retrieve the grant. If something scry the grant and the grant retrieve the baldwin then the baldwin is empathetic. If something scry the baldwin and the baldwin surfboard the grant then it surfboard the baldwin. If something is empathetic then it scry the baldwin. The baldwin is empathetic.", "logic": "\nScry(grant, baldwin)\nSurfboard(grant, baldwin)\nPreferent(grant)\nThickened(grant)\nShuddering(grant)\nRetrieve(grant, baldwin)\nScry(baldwin, grant)\nSurfboard(baldwin, grant)\nSeptuple(baldwin)\nRetrieve(baldwin, grant)\nforall x (Scry(x, grant) and Retrieve(grant, baldwin) -> Empathetic(baldwin))\nforall x (Scry(x, baldwin) and Surfboard(baldwin, grant) -> Surfboard(x, baldwin))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Scry(x, baldwin))\n\nEmpathetic(baldwin)\n\nScry(baldwin, grant) and Retrieve(grant, baldwin) and forall x (Scry(x, grant) and Retrieve(grant, baldwin) -> Empathetic(baldwin)) -> therefore Empathetic(baldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The french consider the misti. The french revet the misti. The french is worthy. The french is suborbital. The french is waning. The french rescale the misti. The misti consider the french. The misti revet the french. The misti is unsighted. The misti rescale the french. If something consider the french and the french rescale the misti then the misti is upland. If something consider the misti and the misti revet the french then it revet the misti. If something is upland then it consider the misti. The misti is not upland.", "logic": "\nConsider(french, misti)\nRevet(french, misti)\nWorthy(french)\nSuborbital(french)\nWaning(french)\nRescale(french, misti)\nConsider(misti, french)\nRevet(misti, french)\nUnsighted(misti)\nRescale(misti, french)\nforall x (Consider(x, french) and Rescale(french, misti) -> Upland(misti))\nforall x (Consider(x, misti) and Revet(misti, french) -> Revet(x, misti))\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Consider(x, misti))\n\nnot Upland(misti)\n\nConsider(misti, french) and Rescale(french, misti) and forall x (Consider(x, french) and Rescale(french, misti) -> Upland(misti)) -> therefore Upland(misti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The geof copy the carmen. The geof jeopardize the carmen. The geof is boisterous. The geof is unifoliate. The geof is unseeing. The geof crave the carmen. The carmen copy the geof. The carmen jeopardize the geof. The carmen is nebulose. The carmen crave the geof. If something copy the geof and the geof crave the carmen then the carmen is scraggy. If something copy the carmen and the carmen jeopardize the geof then it jeopardize the carmen. If something is scraggy then it copy the carmen. The carmen copy the carmen.", "logic": "\nCopy(geof, carmen)\nJeopardize(geof, carmen)\nBoisterous(geof)\nUnifoliate(geof)\nUnseeing(geof)\nCrave(geof, carmen)\nCopy(carmen, geof)\nJeopardize(carmen, geof)\nNebulose(carmen)\nCrave(carmen, geof)\nforall x (Copy(x, geof) and Crave(geof, carmen) -> Scraggy(carmen))\nforall x (Copy(x, carmen) and Jeopardize(carmen, geof) -> Jeopardize(x, carmen))\nforall x (Scraggy(x) -> Copy(x, carmen))\n\nCopy(carmen, carmen)\n\nCopy(carmen, geof) and Crave(geof, carmen) and forall x (Copy(x, geof) and Crave(geof, carmen) -> Scraggy(carmen)) -> therefore Scraggy(carmen) Scraggy(carmen) and forall x (Scraggy(x) -> Copy(x, carmen)) -> therefore Copy(carmen, carmen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The nellie conglobe the janith. The nellie hyphen the janith. The nellie is dominical. The nellie is asthmatic. The nellie is ottoman. The nellie focalise the janith. The janith conglobe the nellie. The janith hyphen the nellie. The janith is meningeal. The janith focalise the nellie. If something conglobe the nellie and the nellie focalise the janith then the janith is coated. If something conglobe the janith and the janith hyphen the nellie then it hyphen the janith. If something is coated then it conglobe the janith. The janith does not chase the janith.", "logic": "\nConglobe(nellie, janith)\nHyphen(nellie, janith)\nDominical(nellie)\nAsthmatic(nellie)\nOttoman(nellie)\nFocalise(nellie, janith)\nConglobe(janith, nellie)\nHyphen(janith, nellie)\nMeningeal(janith)\nFocalise(janith, nellie)\nforall x (Conglobe(x, nellie) and Focalise(nellie, janith) -> Coated(janith))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, janith) and Hyphen(janith, nellie) -> Hyphen(x, janith))\nforall x (Coated(x) -> Conglobe(x, janith))\n\nnot Conglobe(janith, janith)\n\nConglobe(janith, nellie) and Focalise(nellie, janith) and forall x (Conglobe(x, nellie) and Focalise(nellie, janith) -> Coated(janith)) -> therefore Coated(janith) Coated(janith) and forall x (Coated(x) -> Conglobe(x, janith)) -> therefore Conglobe(janith, janith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The leoline emanate the adriena. The leoline retaliate the adriena. The leoline is dendritic. The leoline is motherly. The leoline is terminal. The leoline tape the adriena. The adriena emanate the leoline. The adriena retaliate the leoline. The adriena is synchronal. The adriena tape the leoline. If something emanate the leoline and the leoline tape the adriena then the adriena is fanciful. If something emanate the adriena and the adriena retaliate the leoline then it retaliate the adriena. If something is fanciful then it emanate the adriena. The adriena retaliate the adriena.", "logic": "\nEmanate(leoline, adriena)\nRetaliate(leoline, adriena)\nDendritic(leoline)\nMotherly(leoline)\nTerminal(leoline)\nTape(leoline, adriena)\nEmanate(adriena, leoline)\nRetaliate(adriena, leoline)\nSynchronal(adriena)\nTape(adriena, leoline)\nforall x (Emanate(x, leoline) and Tape(leoline, adriena) -> Fanciful(adriena))\nforall x (Emanate(x, adriena) and Retaliate(adriena, leoline) -> Retaliate(x, adriena))\nforall x (Fanciful(x) -> Emanate(x, adriena))\n\nRetaliate(adriena, adriena)\n\nEmanate(adriena, leoline) and Tape(leoline, adriena) and forall x (Emanate(x, leoline) and Tape(leoline, adriena) -> Fanciful(adriena)) -> therefore Fanciful(adriena) Fanciful(adriena) and forall x (Fanciful(x) -> Emanate(x, adriena)) -> therefore Emanate(adriena, adriena) Emanate(adriena, adriena) and Retaliate(adriena, leoline) and forall x (Emanate(x, adriena) and Retaliate(adriena, leoline) -> Retaliate(x, adriena)) -> therefore Retaliate(adriena, adriena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The danyelle clerk the johnny. The danyelle zinc the johnny. The danyelle is orotund. The danyelle is agitated. The danyelle is successive. The danyelle betray the johnny. The johnny clerk the danyelle. The johnny zinc the danyelle. The johnny is disjunct. The johnny betray the danyelle. If something clerk the danyelle and the danyelle betray the johnny then the johnny is stepwise. If something clerk the johnny and the johnny zinc the danyelle then it zinc the johnny. If something is stepwise then it clerk the johnny. The johnny does not eat the johnny.", "logic": "\nClerk(danyelle, johnny)\nZinc(danyelle, johnny)\nOrotund(danyelle)\nAgitated(danyelle)\nSuccessive(danyelle)\nBetray(danyelle, johnny)\nClerk(johnny, danyelle)\nZinc(johnny, danyelle)\nDisjunct(johnny)\nBetray(johnny, danyelle)\nforall x (Clerk(x, danyelle) and Betray(danyelle, johnny) -> Stepwise(johnny))\nforall x (Clerk(x, johnny) and Zinc(johnny, danyelle) -> Zinc(x, johnny))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) -> Clerk(x, johnny))\n\nnot Zinc(johnny, johnny)\n\nClerk(johnny, danyelle) and Betray(danyelle, johnny) and forall x (Clerk(x, danyelle) and Betray(danyelle, johnny) -> Stepwise(johnny)) -> therefore Stepwise(johnny) Stepwise(johnny) and forall x (Stepwise(x) -> Clerk(x, johnny)) -> therefore Clerk(johnny, johnny) Clerk(johnny, johnny) and Zinc(johnny, danyelle) and forall x (Clerk(x, johnny) and Zinc(johnny, danyelle) -> Zinc(x, johnny)) -> therefore Zinc(johnny, johnny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The tad spume the miran. The tad interleave the miran. The tad is awestruck. The tad is disliked. The tad is kinglike. The tad complot the miran. The miran spume the tad. The miran interleave the tad. The miran is chopfallen. The miran complot the tad. If something spume the tad and the tad complot the miran then the miran is swinging. If something spume the miran and the miran interleave the tad then it interleave the miran. If something is swinging then it spume the miran. The tad does not chase the tad.", "logic": "\nSpume(tad, miran)\nInterleave(tad, miran)\nAwestruck(tad)\nDisliked(tad)\nKinglike(tad)\nComplot(tad, miran)\nSpume(miran, tad)\nInterleave(miran, tad)\nChopfallen(miran)\nComplot(miran, tad)\nforall x (Spume(x, tad) and Complot(tad, miran) -> Swinging(miran))\nforall x (Spume(x, miran) and Interleave(miran, tad) -> Interleave(x, miran))\nforall x (Swinging(x) -> Spume(x, miran))\n\nnot Spume(tad, tad)\n\nnot Spume(tad, tad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The hubert fine the janaye. The hubert troll the janaye. The hubert is ashy. The hubert is exhausted. The hubert is genital. The hubert requite the janaye. The janaye fine the hubert. The janaye troll the hubert. The janaye is anopheline. The janaye requite the hubert. If something fine the hubert and the hubert requite the janaye then the janaye is speckless. If something fine the janaye and the janaye troll the hubert then it troll the janaye. If something is speckless then it fine the janaye. The janaye is genital.", "logic": "\nFine(hubert, janaye)\nTroll(hubert, janaye)\nAshy(hubert)\nExhausted(hubert)\nGenital(hubert)\nRequite(hubert, janaye)\nFine(janaye, hubert)\nTroll(janaye, hubert)\nAnopheline(janaye)\nRequite(janaye, hubert)\nforall x (Fine(x, hubert) and Requite(hubert, janaye) -> Speckless(janaye))\nforall x (Fine(x, janaye) and Troll(janaye, hubert) -> Troll(x, janaye))\nforall x (Speckless(x) -> Fine(x, janaye))\n\nGenital(janaye)\n\nGenital(janaye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The eadith step the debby. The eadith thrill the debby. The eadith is zodiacal. The eadith is charnel. The eadith is matched. The eadith rehearse the debby. The debby step the eadith. The debby thrill the eadith. The debby is hungarian. The debby rehearse the eadith. If something step the eadith and the eadith rehearse the debby then the debby is spurned. If something step the debby and the debby thrill the eadith then it thrill the debby. If something is spurned then it step the debby. The eadith is not hungarian.", "logic": "\nStep(eadith, debby)\nThrill(eadith, debby)\nZodiacal(eadith)\nCharnel(eadith)\nMatched(eadith)\nRehearse(eadith, debby)\nStep(debby, eadith)\nThrill(debby, eadith)\nHungarian(debby)\nRehearse(debby, eadith)\nforall x (Step(x, eadith) and Rehearse(eadith, debby) -> Spurned(debby))\nforall x (Step(x, debby) and Thrill(debby, eadith) -> Thrill(x, debby))\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Step(x, debby))\n\nnot Hungarian(eadith)\n\nnot Hungarian(eadith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The randall slather the jamey. The randall negate the jamey. The randall is lilting. The randall is archaistic. The randall is stricken. The randall incense the jamey. The jamey slather the randall. The jamey negate the randall. The jamey is mineral. The jamey incense the randall. If something slather the randall and the randall incense the jamey then the jamey is bouncy. If something slather the jamey and the jamey negate the randall then it negate the jamey. If something is bouncy then it slather the jamey. The jamey is lilting.", "logic": "\nSlather(randall, jamey)\nNegate(randall, jamey)\nLilting(randall)\nArchaistic(randall)\nStricken(randall)\nIncense(randall, jamey)\nSlather(jamey, randall)\nNegate(jamey, randall)\nMineral(jamey)\nIncense(jamey, randall)\nforall x (Slather(x, randall) and Incense(randall, jamey) -> Bouncy(jamey))\nforall x (Slather(x, jamey) and Negate(jamey, randall) -> Negate(x, jamey))\nforall x (Bouncy(x) -> Slather(x, jamey))\n\nLilting(jamey)\n\nLilting(jamey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The caril colorise the garwin. The caril hill the garwin. The caril is bicornuate. The caril is upstair. The caril is earnest. The caril iron the garwin. The garwin colorise the caril. The garwin hill the caril. The garwin is incisive. The garwin iron the caril. If something colorise the caril and the caril iron the garwin then the garwin is streetwise. If something colorise the garwin and the garwin hill the caril then it hill the garwin. If something is streetwise then it colorise the garwin. The caril does not visit the caril.", "logic": "\nColorise(caril, garwin)\nHill(caril, garwin)\nBicornuate(caril)\nUpstair(caril)\nEarnest(caril)\nIron(caril, garwin)\nColorise(garwin, caril)\nHill(garwin, caril)\nIncisive(garwin)\nIron(garwin, caril)\nforall x (Colorise(x, caril) and Iron(caril, garwin) -> Streetwise(garwin))\nforall x (Colorise(x, garwin) and Hill(garwin, caril) -> Hill(x, garwin))\nforall x (Streetwise(x) -> Colorise(x, garwin))\n\nnot Iron(caril, caril)\n\nnot Iron(caril, caril) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The magda char the henriette. The magda veto the henriette. The magda is boylike. The magda is practised. The magda is enate. The magda snowboard the henriette. The henriette char the magda. The henriette veto the magda. The henriette is bladed. The henriette snowboard the magda. If something char the magda and the magda snowboard the henriette then the henriette is lxxviii. If something char the henriette and the henriette veto the magda then it veto the henriette. If something is lxxviii then it char the henriette. The henriette is practised.", "logic": "\nChar(magda, henriette)\nVeto(magda, henriette)\nBoylike(magda)\nPractised(magda)\nEnate(magda)\nSnowboard(magda, henriette)\nChar(henriette, magda)\nVeto(henriette, magda)\nBladed(henriette)\nSnowboard(henriette, magda)\nforall x (Char(x, magda) and Snowboard(magda, henriette) -> Lxxviii(henriette))\nforall x (Char(x, henriette) and Veto(henriette, magda) -> Veto(x, henriette))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> Char(x, henriette))\n\nPractised(henriette)\n\nPractised(henriette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The sidoney consult the kalina. The sidoney book the kalina. The sidoney is uxorial. The sidoney is exculpated. The sidoney is narrative. The sidoney circle the kalina. The kalina consult the sidoney. The kalina book the sidoney. The kalina is uptight. The kalina circle the sidoney. If something consult the sidoney and the sidoney circle the kalina then the kalina is peritoneal. If something consult the kalina and the kalina book the sidoney then it book the kalina. If something is peritoneal then it consult the kalina. The kalina does not visit the kalina.", "logic": "\nConsult(sidoney, kalina)\nBook(sidoney, kalina)\nUxorial(sidoney)\nExculpated(sidoney)\nNarrative(sidoney)\nCircle(sidoney, kalina)\nConsult(kalina, sidoney)\nBook(kalina, sidoney)\nUptight(kalina)\nCircle(kalina, sidoney)\nforall x (Consult(x, sidoney) and Circle(sidoney, kalina) -> Peritoneal(kalina))\nforall x (Consult(x, kalina) and Book(kalina, sidoney) -> Book(x, kalina))\nforall x (Peritoneal(x) -> Consult(x, kalina))\n\nnot Circle(kalina, kalina)\n\nnot Circle(kalina, kalina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The aimil batch the albrecht. The aimil phrase the albrecht. The aimil is unpeopled. The aimil is menopausal. The aimil is teenaged. The aimil coagulate the albrecht. The albrecht batch the aimil. The albrecht phrase the aimil. The albrecht is teetotal. The albrecht coagulate the aimil. If something batch the aimil and the aimil coagulate the albrecht then the albrecht is rattled. If something batch the albrecht and the albrecht phrase the aimil then it phrase the albrecht. If something is rattled then it batch the albrecht. The aimil phrase the aimil.", "logic": "\nBatch(aimil, albrecht)\nPhrase(aimil, albrecht)\nUnpeopled(aimil)\nMenopausal(aimil)\nTeenaged(aimil)\nCoagulate(aimil, albrecht)\nBatch(albrecht, aimil)\nPhrase(albrecht, aimil)\nTeetotal(albrecht)\nCoagulate(albrecht, aimil)\nforall x (Batch(x, aimil) and Coagulate(aimil, albrecht) -> Rattled(albrecht))\nforall x (Batch(x, albrecht) and Phrase(albrecht, aimil) -> Phrase(x, albrecht))\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Batch(x, albrecht))\n\nPhrase(aimil, aimil)\n\nPhrase(aimil, aimil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The karrah smoke the toby. The karrah gasp the toby. The karrah rate the sven. The karrah rate the toby. The sven smoke the karrah. The sven smoke the toby. The sven is lemony. The sven is miasmic. The sven gasp the karrah. The sven rate the karrah. The toby smoke the karrah. The toby gasp the sven. If the karrah rate the sven then the sven smoke the karrah. If someone rate the toby and the toby gasp the sven then they are agaze. If someone is lemony then they are miasmic. If someone gasp the toby then they are lemony. If someone gasp the sven then they need the toby. If someone smoke the sven and they are tenanted then the sven is tenanted. If someone is tenanted and they need the karrah then the karrah smoke the toby. If someone is lemony then they need the sven. The sven is miasmic.", "logic": "\nSmoke(karrah, toby)\nGasp(karrah, toby)\nRate(karrah, sven)\nRate(karrah, toby)\nSmoke(sven, karrah)\nSmoke(sven, toby)\nLemony(sven)\nMiasmic(sven)\nGasp(sven, karrah)\nRate(sven, karrah)\nSmoke(toby, karrah)\nGasp(toby, sven)\nRate(karrah, sven) -> Smoke(sven, karrah)\nforall x (Rate(x, toby) and Gasp(toby, sven) -> Agaze(x))\nforall x (Lemony(x) -> Miasmic(x))\nforall x (Gasp(x, toby) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Gasp(x, sven) -> Gasp(x, toby))\nforall x (Smoke(x, sven) and Tenanted(x) -> Tenanted(sven))\nforall x (Tenanted(x) and Gasp(x, karrah) -> Smoke(karrah, toby))\nforall x (Lemony(x) -> Gasp(x, sven))\n\nMiasmic(sven)\n\ntherefore Miasmic(sven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The noella allot the magda. The noella accomplish the magda. The noella theologise the lona. The noella theologise the magda. The lona allot the noella. The lona allot the magda. The lona is cushy. The lona is electric. The lona accomplish the noella. The lona theologise the noella. The magda allot the noella. The magda accomplish the lona. If the noella theologise the lona then the lona allot the noella. If someone theologise the magda and the magda accomplish the lona then they are streaked. If someone is cushy then they are electric. If someone accomplish the magda then they are cushy. If someone accomplish the lona then they need the magda. If someone allot the lona and they are wrothful then the lona is wrothful. If someone is wrothful and they need the noella then the noella allot the magda. If someone is cushy then they need the lona. The noella does not visit the magda.", "logic": "\nAllot(noella, magda)\nAccomplish(noella, magda)\nTheologise(noella, lona)\nTheologise(noella, magda)\nAllot(lona, noella)\nAllot(lona, magda)\nCushy(lona)\nElectric(lona)\nAccomplish(lona, noella)\nTheologise(lona, noella)\nAllot(magda, noella)\nAccomplish(magda, lona)\nTheologise(noella, lona) -> Allot(lona, noella)\nforall x (Theologise(x, magda) and Accomplish(magda, lona) -> Streaked(x))\nforall x (Cushy(x) -> Electric(x))\nforall x (Accomplish(x, magda) -> Cushy(x))\nforall x (Accomplish(x, lona) -> Accomplish(x, magda))\nforall x (Allot(x, lona) and Wrothful(x) -> Wrothful(lona))\nforall x (Wrothful(x) and Accomplish(x, noella) -> Allot(noella, magda))\nforall x (Cushy(x) -> Accomplish(x, lona))\n\nnot Theologise(noella, magda)\n\ntherefore Theologise(noella, magda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The hugo rice the lissy. The hugo unteach the lissy. The hugo defraud the bamby. The hugo defraud the lissy. The bamby rice the hugo. The bamby rice the lissy. The bamby is orbitual. The bamby is edified. The bamby unteach the hugo. The bamby defraud the hugo. The lissy rice the hugo. The lissy unteach the bamby. If the hugo defraud the bamby then the bamby rice the hugo. If someone defraud the lissy and the lissy unteach the bamby then they are choosey. If someone is orbitual then they are edified. If someone unteach the lissy then they are orbitual. If someone unteach the bamby then they need the lissy. If someone rice the bamby and they are bistroic then the bamby is bistroic. If someone is bistroic and they need the hugo then the hugo rice the lissy. If someone is orbitual then they need the bamby. The hugo is choosey.", "logic": "\nRice(hugo, lissy)\nUnteach(hugo, lissy)\nDefraud(hugo, bamby)\nDefraud(hugo, lissy)\nRice(bamby, hugo)\nRice(bamby, lissy)\nOrbitual(bamby)\nEdified(bamby)\nUnteach(bamby, hugo)\nDefraud(bamby, hugo)\nRice(lissy, hugo)\nUnteach(lissy, bamby)\nDefraud(hugo, bamby) -> Rice(bamby, hugo)\nforall x (Defraud(x, lissy) and Unteach(lissy, bamby) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Edified(x))\nforall x (Unteach(x, lissy) -> Orbitual(x))\nforall x (Unteach(x, bamby) -> Unteach(x, lissy))\nforall x (Rice(x, bamby) and Bistroic(x) -> Bistroic(bamby))\nforall x (Bistroic(x) and Unteach(x, hugo) -> Rice(hugo, lissy))\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Unteach(x, bamby))\n\nChoosey(hugo)\n\nDefraud(hugo, lissy) and Unteach(lissy, bamby) and forall x (Defraud(x, lissy) and Unteach(lissy, bamby) -> Choosey(x)) -> therefore Choosey(hugo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The armond dose the hilliary. The armond empower the hilliary. The armond sediment the hilarie. The armond sediment the hilliary. The hilarie dose the armond. The hilarie dose the hilliary. The hilarie is tawdry. The hilarie is sphingine. The hilarie empower the armond. The hilarie sediment the armond. The hilliary dose the armond. The hilliary empower the hilarie. If the armond sediment the hilarie then the hilarie dose the armond. If someone sediment the hilliary and the hilliary empower the hilarie then they are rejoicing. If someone is tawdry then they are sphingine. If someone empower the hilliary then they are tawdry. If someone empower the hilarie then they need the hilliary. If someone dose the hilarie and they are nautical then the hilarie is nautical. If someone is nautical and they need the armond then the armond dose the hilliary. If someone is tawdry then they need the hilarie. The hilliary does not need the hilliary.", "logic": "\nDose(armond, hilliary)\nEmpower(armond, hilliary)\nSediment(armond, hilarie)\nSediment(armond, hilliary)\nDose(hilarie, armond)\nDose(hilarie, hilliary)\nTawdry(hilarie)\nSphingine(hilarie)\nEmpower(hilarie, armond)\nSediment(hilarie, armond)\nDose(hilliary, armond)\nEmpower(hilliary, hilarie)\nSediment(armond, hilarie) -> Dose(hilarie, armond)\nforall x (Sediment(x, hilliary) and Empower(hilliary, hilarie) -> Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> Sphingine(x))\nforall x (Empower(x, hilliary) -> Tawdry(x))\nforall x (Empower(x, hilarie) -> Empower(x, hilliary))\nforall x (Dose(x, hilarie) and Nautical(x) -> Nautical(hilarie))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and Empower(x, armond) -> Dose(armond, hilliary))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> Empower(x, hilarie))\n\nnot Empower(hilliary, hilliary)\n\nEmpower(hilliary, hilarie) and forall x (Empower(x, hilarie) -> Empower(x, hilliary)) -> therefore Empower(hilliary, hilliary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The gerald commutate the jannelle. The gerald dirty the jannelle. The gerald denounce the jacinthe. The gerald denounce the jannelle. The jacinthe commutate the gerald. The jacinthe commutate the jannelle. The jacinthe is geared. The jacinthe is failing. The jacinthe dirty the gerald. The jacinthe denounce the gerald. The jannelle commutate the gerald. The jannelle dirty the jacinthe. If the gerald denounce the jacinthe then the jacinthe commutate the gerald. If someone denounce the jannelle and the jannelle dirty the jacinthe then they are improvable. If someone is geared then they are failing. If someone dirty the jannelle then they are geared. If someone dirty the jacinthe then they need the jannelle. If someone commutate the jacinthe and they are absent then the jacinthe is absent. If someone is absent and they need the gerald then the gerald commutate the jannelle. If someone is geared then they need the jacinthe. The jacinthe dirty the jannelle.", "logic": "\nCommutate(gerald, jannelle)\nDirty(gerald, jannelle)\nDenounce(gerald, jacinthe)\nDenounce(gerald, jannelle)\nCommutate(jacinthe, gerald)\nCommutate(jacinthe, jannelle)\nGeared(jacinthe)\nFailing(jacinthe)\nDirty(jacinthe, gerald)\nDenounce(jacinthe, gerald)\nCommutate(jannelle, gerald)\nDirty(jannelle, jacinthe)\nDenounce(gerald, jacinthe) -> Commutate(jacinthe, gerald)\nforall x (Denounce(x, jannelle) and Dirty(jannelle, jacinthe) -> Improvable(x))\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Failing(x))\nforall x (Dirty(x, jannelle) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Dirty(x, jacinthe) -> Dirty(x, jannelle))\nforall x (Commutate(x, jacinthe) and Absent(x) -> Absent(jacinthe))\nforall x (Absent(x) and Dirty(x, gerald) -> Commutate(gerald, jannelle))\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Dirty(x, jacinthe))\n\nDirty(jacinthe, jannelle)\n\nGeared(jacinthe) and forall x (Geared(x) -> Dirty(x, jacinthe)) -> therefore Dirty(jacinthe, jacinthe) Dirty(jacinthe, jacinthe) and forall x (Dirty(x, jacinthe) -> Dirty(x, jannelle)) -> therefore Dirty(jacinthe, jannelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The frannie precook the elbertina. The frannie identify the elbertina. The frannie bollocks the kathe. The frannie bollocks the elbertina. The kathe precook the frannie. The kathe precook the elbertina. The kathe is pampering. The kathe is orbiculate. The kathe identify the frannie. The kathe bollocks the frannie. The elbertina precook the frannie. The elbertina identify the kathe. If the frannie bollocks the kathe then the kathe precook the frannie. If someone bollocks the elbertina and the elbertina identify the kathe then they are monoclonal. If someone is pampering then they are orbiculate. If someone identify the elbertina then they are pampering. If someone identify the kathe then they need the elbertina. If someone precook the kathe and they are yokelish then the kathe is yokelish. If someone is yokelish and they need the frannie then the frannie precook the elbertina. If someone is pampering then they need the kathe. The frannie is not orbiculate.", "logic": "\nPrecook(frannie, elbertina)\nIdentify(frannie, elbertina)\nBollocks(frannie, kathe)\nBollocks(frannie, elbertina)\nPrecook(kathe, frannie)\nPrecook(kathe, elbertina)\nPampering(kathe)\nOrbiculate(kathe)\nIdentify(kathe, frannie)\nBollocks(kathe, frannie)\nPrecook(elbertina, frannie)\nIdentify(elbertina, kathe)\nBollocks(frannie, kathe) -> Precook(kathe, frannie)\nforall x (Bollocks(x, elbertina) and Identify(elbertina, kathe) -> Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Pampering(x) -> Orbiculate(x))\nforall x (Identify(x, elbertina) -> Pampering(x))\nforall x (Identify(x, kathe) -> Identify(x, elbertina))\nforall x (Precook(x, kathe) and Yokelish(x) -> Yokelish(kathe))\nforall x (Yokelish(x) and Identify(x, frannie) -> Precook(frannie, elbertina))\nforall x (Pampering(x) -> Identify(x, kathe))\n\nnot Orbiculate(frannie)\n\nIdentify(frannie, elbertina) and forall x (Identify(x, elbertina) -> Pampering(x)) -> therefore Pampering(frannie) Pampering(frannie) and forall x (Pampering(x) -> Orbiculate(x)) -> therefore Orbiculate(frannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The geraldine offset the nerte. The geraldine light the nerte. The geraldine aline the zeke. The geraldine aline the nerte. The zeke offset the geraldine. The zeke offset the nerte. The zeke is footsore. The zeke is chronic. The zeke light the geraldine. The zeke aline the geraldine. The nerte offset the geraldine. The nerte light the zeke. If the geraldine aline the zeke then the zeke offset the geraldine. If someone aline the nerte and the nerte light the zeke then they are bobtail. If someone is footsore then they are chronic. If someone light the nerte then they are footsore. If someone light the zeke then they need the nerte. If someone offset the zeke and they are assuming then the zeke is assuming. If someone is assuming and they need the geraldine then the geraldine offset the nerte. If someone is footsore then they need the zeke. The nerte is chronic.", "logic": "\nOffset(geraldine, nerte)\nLight(geraldine, nerte)\nAline(geraldine, zeke)\nAline(geraldine, nerte)\nOffset(zeke, geraldine)\nOffset(zeke, nerte)\nFootsore(zeke)\nChronic(zeke)\nLight(zeke, geraldine)\nAline(zeke, geraldine)\nOffset(nerte, geraldine)\nLight(nerte, zeke)\nAline(geraldine, zeke) -> Offset(zeke, geraldine)\nforall x (Aline(x, nerte) and Light(nerte, zeke) -> Bobtail(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) -> Chronic(x))\nforall x (Light(x, nerte) -> Footsore(x))\nforall x (Light(x, zeke) -> Light(x, nerte))\nforall x (Offset(x, zeke) and Assuming(x) -> Assuming(zeke))\nforall x (Assuming(x) and Light(x, geraldine) -> Offset(geraldine, nerte))\nforall x (Footsore(x) -> Light(x, zeke))\n\nChronic(nerte)\n\nLight(nerte, zeke) and forall x (Light(x, zeke) -> Light(x, nerte)) -> therefore Light(nerte, nerte) Light(nerte, nerte) and forall x (Light(x, nerte) -> Footsore(x)) -> therefore Footsore(nerte) Footsore(nerte) and forall x (Footsore(x) -> Chronic(x)) -> therefore Chronic(nerte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The delia shew the peggy. The delia abandon the peggy. The delia browse the alissa. The delia browse the peggy. The alissa shew the delia. The alissa shew the peggy. The alissa is acute. The alissa is psychic. The alissa abandon the delia. The alissa browse the delia. The peggy shew the delia. The peggy abandon the alissa. If the delia browse the alissa then the alissa shew the delia. If someone browse the peggy and the peggy abandon the alissa then they are ebony. If someone is acute then they are psychic. If someone abandon the peggy then they are acute. If someone abandon the alissa then they need the peggy. If someone shew the alissa and they are hardy then the alissa is hardy. If someone is hardy and they need the delia then the delia shew the peggy. If someone is acute then they need the alissa. The peggy is not psychic.", "logic": "\nShew(delia, peggy)\nAbandon(delia, peggy)\nBrowse(delia, alissa)\nBrowse(delia, peggy)\nShew(alissa, delia)\nShew(alissa, peggy)\nAcute(alissa)\nPsychic(alissa)\nAbandon(alissa, delia)\nBrowse(alissa, delia)\nShew(peggy, delia)\nAbandon(peggy, alissa)\nBrowse(delia, alissa) -> Shew(alissa, delia)\nforall x (Browse(x, peggy) and Abandon(peggy, alissa) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Abandon(x, peggy) -> Acute(x))\nforall x (Abandon(x, alissa) -> Abandon(x, peggy))\nforall x (Shew(x, alissa) and Hardy(x) -> Hardy(alissa))\nforall x (Hardy(x) and Abandon(x, delia) -> Shew(delia, peggy))\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Abandon(x, alissa))\n\nnot Psychic(peggy)\n\nAbandon(peggy, alissa) and forall x (Abandon(x, alissa) -> Abandon(x, peggy)) -> therefore Abandon(peggy, peggy) Abandon(peggy, peggy) and forall x (Abandon(x, peggy) -> Acute(x)) -> therefore Acute(peggy) Acute(peggy) and forall x (Acute(x) -> Psychic(x)) -> therefore Psychic(peggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The blaire replicate the dalton. The blaire attempt the dalton. The blaire turf the annabelle. The blaire turf the dalton. The annabelle replicate the blaire. The annabelle replicate the dalton. The annabelle is obsessive. The annabelle is unlabeled. The annabelle attempt the blaire. The annabelle turf the blaire. The dalton replicate the blaire. The dalton attempt the annabelle. If the blaire turf the annabelle then the annabelle replicate the blaire. If someone turf the dalton and the dalton attempt the annabelle then they are unmanlike. If someone is obsessive then they are unlabeled. If someone attempt the dalton then they are obsessive. If someone attempt the annabelle then they need the dalton. If someone replicate the annabelle and they are pinnate then the annabelle is pinnate. If someone is pinnate and they need the blaire then the blaire replicate the dalton. If someone is obsessive then they need the annabelle. The annabelle is not unmanlike.", "logic": "\nReplicate(blaire, dalton)\nAttempt(blaire, dalton)\nTurf(blaire, annabelle)\nTurf(blaire, dalton)\nReplicate(annabelle, blaire)\nReplicate(annabelle, dalton)\nObsessive(annabelle)\nUnlabeled(annabelle)\nAttempt(annabelle, blaire)\nTurf(annabelle, blaire)\nReplicate(dalton, blaire)\nAttempt(dalton, annabelle)\nTurf(blaire, annabelle) -> Replicate(annabelle, blaire)\nforall x (Turf(x, dalton) and Attempt(dalton, annabelle) -> Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Obsessive(x) -> Unlabeled(x))\nforall x (Attempt(x, dalton) -> Obsessive(x))\nforall x (Attempt(x, annabelle) -> Attempt(x, dalton))\nforall x (Replicate(x, annabelle) and Pinnate(x) -> Pinnate(annabelle))\nforall x (Pinnate(x) and Attempt(x, blaire) -> Replicate(blaire, dalton))\nforall x (Obsessive(x) -> Attempt(x, annabelle))\n\nnot Unmanlike(annabelle)\n\nforall x (Turf(x, dalton) and Attempt(dalton, annabelle) -> Unmanlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The garret master the adele. The garret gelatinise the adele. The garret disbar the geralda. The garret disbar the adele. The geralda master the garret. The geralda master the adele. The geralda is stung. The geralda is principled. The geralda gelatinise the garret. The geralda disbar the garret. The adele master the garret. The adele gelatinise the geralda. If the garret disbar the geralda then the geralda master the garret. If someone disbar the adele and the adele gelatinise the geralda then they are piffling. If someone is stung then they are principled. If someone gelatinise the adele then they are stung. If someone gelatinise the geralda then they need the adele. If someone master the geralda and they are riblike then the geralda is riblike. If someone is riblike and they need the garret then the garret master the adele. If someone is stung then they need the geralda. The geralda is riblike.", "logic": "\nMaster(garret, adele)\nGelatinise(garret, adele)\nDisbar(garret, geralda)\nDisbar(garret, adele)\nMaster(geralda, garret)\nMaster(geralda, adele)\nStung(geralda)\nPrincipled(geralda)\nGelatinise(geralda, garret)\nDisbar(geralda, garret)\nMaster(adele, garret)\nGelatinise(adele, geralda)\nDisbar(garret, geralda) -> Master(geralda, garret)\nforall x (Disbar(x, adele) and Gelatinise(adele, geralda) -> Piffling(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Principled(x))\nforall x (Gelatinise(x, adele) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Gelatinise(x, geralda) -> Gelatinise(x, adele))\nforall x (Master(x, geralda) and Riblike(x) -> Riblike(geralda))\nforall x (Riblike(x) and Gelatinise(x, garret) -> Master(garret, adele))\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Gelatinise(x, geralda))\n\nRiblike(geralda)\n\nforall x (Master(x, geralda) and Riblike(x) -> Riblike(geralda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The isador hymn the maiga. The isador blunt the maiga. The isador scrounge the susana. The isador scrounge the maiga. The susana hymn the isador. The susana hymn the maiga. The susana is fretted. The susana is moraceous. The susana blunt the isador. The susana scrounge the isador. The maiga hymn the isador. The maiga blunt the susana. If the isador scrounge the susana then the susana hymn the isador. If someone scrounge the maiga and the maiga blunt the susana then they are overloaded. If someone is fretted then they are moraceous. If someone blunt the maiga then they are fretted. If someone blunt the susana then they need the maiga. If someone hymn the susana and they are parasitic then the susana is parasitic. If someone is parasitic and they need the isador then the isador hymn the maiga. If someone is fretted then they need the susana. The maiga is not overloaded.", "logic": "\nHymn(isador, maiga)\nBlunt(isador, maiga)\nScrounge(isador, susana)\nScrounge(isador, maiga)\nHymn(susana, isador)\nHymn(susana, maiga)\nFretted(susana)\nMoraceous(susana)\nBlunt(susana, isador)\nScrounge(susana, isador)\nHymn(maiga, isador)\nBlunt(maiga, susana)\nScrounge(isador, susana) -> Hymn(susana, isador)\nforall x (Scrounge(x, maiga) and Blunt(maiga, susana) -> Overloaded(x))\nforall x (Fretted(x) -> Moraceous(x))\nforall x (Blunt(x, maiga) -> Fretted(x))\nforall x (Blunt(x, susana) -> Blunt(x, maiga))\nforall x (Hymn(x, susana) and Parasitic(x) -> Parasitic(susana))\nforall x (Parasitic(x) and Blunt(x, isador) -> Hymn(isador, maiga))\nforall x (Fretted(x) -> Blunt(x, susana))\n\nnot Overloaded(maiga)\n\nforall x (Scrounge(x, maiga) and Blunt(maiga, susana) -> Overloaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The kaile winterise the martina. The kaile scan the martina. The kaile readmit the ethan. The kaile readmit the martina. The ethan winterise the kaile. The ethan winterise the martina. The ethan is formulary. The ethan is matching. The ethan scan the kaile. The ethan readmit the kaile. The martina winterise the kaile. The martina scan the ethan. If the kaile readmit the ethan then the ethan winterise the kaile. If someone readmit the martina and the martina scan the ethan then they are taloned. If someone is formulary then they are matching. If someone scan the martina then they are formulary. If someone scan the ethan then they need the martina. If someone winterise the ethan and they are unsuited then the ethan is unsuited. If someone is unsuited and they need the kaile then the kaile winterise the martina. If someone is formulary then they need the ethan. The ethan winterise the ethan.", "logic": "\nWinterise(kaile, martina)\nScan(kaile, martina)\nReadmit(kaile, ethan)\nReadmit(kaile, martina)\nWinterise(ethan, kaile)\nWinterise(ethan, martina)\nFormulary(ethan)\nMatching(ethan)\nScan(ethan, kaile)\nReadmit(ethan, kaile)\nWinterise(martina, kaile)\nScan(martina, ethan)\nReadmit(kaile, ethan) -> Winterise(ethan, kaile)\nforall x (Readmit(x, martina) and Scan(martina, ethan) -> Taloned(x))\nforall x (Formulary(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Scan(x, martina) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Scan(x, ethan) -> Scan(x, martina))\nforall x (Winterise(x, ethan) and Unsuited(x) -> Unsuited(ethan))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Scan(x, kaile) -> Winterise(kaile, martina))\nforall x (Formulary(x) -> Scan(x, ethan))\n\nWinterise(ethan, ethan)\n\nWinterise(ethan, ethan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The prissie ensky the harrietta. The prissie recess the harrietta. The prissie bestialise the alastair. The prissie bestialise the harrietta. The alastair ensky the prissie. The alastair ensky the harrietta. The alastair is believable. The alastair is nonstick. The alastair recess the prissie. The alastair bestialise the prissie. The harrietta ensky the prissie. The harrietta recess the alastair. If the prissie bestialise the alastair then the alastair ensky the prissie. If someone bestialise the harrietta and the harrietta recess the alastair then they are impeding. If someone is believable then they are nonstick. If someone recess the harrietta then they are believable. If someone recess the alastair then they need the harrietta. If someone ensky the alastair and they are laggard then the alastair is laggard. If someone is laggard and they need the prissie then the prissie ensky the harrietta. If someone is believable then they need the alastair. The harrietta does not eat the harrietta.", "logic": "\nEnsky(prissie, harrietta)\nRecess(prissie, harrietta)\nBestialise(prissie, alastair)\nBestialise(prissie, harrietta)\nEnsky(alastair, prissie)\nEnsky(alastair, harrietta)\nBelievable(alastair)\nNonstick(alastair)\nRecess(alastair, prissie)\nBestialise(alastair, prissie)\nEnsky(harrietta, prissie)\nRecess(harrietta, alastair)\nBestialise(prissie, alastair) -> Ensky(alastair, prissie)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, harrietta) and Recess(harrietta, alastair) -> Impeding(x))\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Nonstick(x))\nforall x (Recess(x, harrietta) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Recess(x, alastair) -> Recess(x, harrietta))\nforall x (Ensky(x, alastair) and Laggard(x) -> Laggard(alastair))\nforall x (Laggard(x) and Recess(x, prissie) -> Ensky(prissie, harrietta))\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Recess(x, alastair))\n\nnot Ensky(harrietta, harrietta)\n\nnot Ensky(harrietta, harrietta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The elysha dash the garcon. The elysha prostitute the garcon. The elysha respite the lilla. The elysha respite the garcon. The lilla dash the elysha. The lilla dash the garcon. The lilla is palmatifid. The lilla is protrusile. The lilla prostitute the elysha. The lilla respite the elysha. The garcon dash the elysha. The garcon prostitute the lilla. If the elysha respite the lilla then the lilla dash the elysha. If someone respite the garcon and the garcon prostitute the lilla then they are uncharged. If someone is palmatifid then they are protrusile. If someone prostitute the garcon then they are palmatifid. If someone prostitute the lilla then they need the garcon. If someone dash the lilla and they are pectinate then the lilla is pectinate. If someone is pectinate and they need the elysha then the elysha dash the garcon. If someone is palmatifid then they need the lilla. The lilla respite the lilla.", "logic": "\nDash(elysha, garcon)\nProstitute(elysha, garcon)\nRespite(elysha, lilla)\nRespite(elysha, garcon)\nDash(lilla, elysha)\nDash(lilla, garcon)\nPalmatifid(lilla)\nProtrusile(lilla)\nProstitute(lilla, elysha)\nRespite(lilla, elysha)\nDash(garcon, elysha)\nProstitute(garcon, lilla)\nRespite(elysha, lilla) -> Dash(lilla, elysha)\nforall x (Respite(x, garcon) and Prostitute(garcon, lilla) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Palmatifid(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, garcon) -> Palmatifid(x))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, lilla) -> Prostitute(x, garcon))\nforall x (Dash(x, lilla) and Pectinate(x) -> Pectinate(lilla))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) and Prostitute(x, elysha) -> Dash(elysha, garcon))\nforall x (Palmatifid(x) -> Prostitute(x, lilla))\n\nRespite(lilla, lilla)\n\nRespite(lilla, lilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The nancey fluoridate the allyce. The nancey frost the allyce. The nancey knock the roberto. The nancey knock the allyce. The roberto fluoridate the nancey. The roberto fluoridate the allyce. The roberto is flushed. The roberto is recreant. The roberto frost the nancey. The roberto knock the nancey. The allyce fluoridate the nancey. The allyce frost the roberto. If the nancey knock the roberto then the roberto fluoridate the nancey. If someone knock the allyce and the allyce frost the roberto then they are hydric. If someone is flushed then they are recreant. If someone frost the allyce then they are flushed. If someone frost the roberto then they need the allyce. If someone fluoridate the roberto and they are throwaway then the roberto is throwaway. If someone is throwaway and they need the nancey then the nancey fluoridate the allyce. If someone is flushed then they need the roberto. The roberto does not visit the allyce.", "logic": "\nFluoridate(nancey, allyce)\nFrost(nancey, allyce)\nKnock(nancey, roberto)\nKnock(nancey, allyce)\nFluoridate(roberto, nancey)\nFluoridate(roberto, allyce)\nFlushed(roberto)\nRecreant(roberto)\nFrost(roberto, nancey)\nKnock(roberto, nancey)\nFluoridate(allyce, nancey)\nFrost(allyce, roberto)\nKnock(nancey, roberto) -> Fluoridate(roberto, nancey)\nforall x (Knock(x, allyce) and Frost(allyce, roberto) -> Hydric(x))\nforall x (Flushed(x) -> Recreant(x))\nforall x (Frost(x, allyce) -> Flushed(x))\nforall x (Frost(x, roberto) -> Frost(x, allyce))\nforall x (Fluoridate(x, roberto) and Throwaway(x) -> Throwaway(roberto))\nforall x (Throwaway(x) and Frost(x, nancey) -> Fluoridate(nancey, allyce))\nforall x (Flushed(x) -> Frost(x, roberto))\n\nnot Knock(roberto, allyce)\n\nnot Knock(roberto, allyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The rajeev impede the pearle. The rajeev exposit the pearle. The rajeev humidify the kalie. The rajeev humidify the pearle. The kalie impede the rajeev. The kalie impede the pearle. The kalie is provincial. The kalie is hewn. The kalie exposit the rajeev. The kalie humidify the rajeev. The pearle impede the rajeev. The pearle exposit the kalie. If the rajeev humidify the kalie then the kalie impede the rajeev. If someone humidify the pearle and the pearle exposit the kalie then they are earthen. If someone is provincial then they are hewn. If someone exposit the pearle then they are provincial. If someone exposit the kalie then they need the pearle. If someone impede the kalie and they are algonquian then the kalie is algonquian. If someone is algonquian and they need the rajeev then the rajeev impede the pearle. If someone is provincial then they need the kalie. The rajeev impede the kalie.", "logic": "\nImpede(rajeev, pearle)\nExposit(rajeev, pearle)\nHumidify(rajeev, kalie)\nHumidify(rajeev, pearle)\nImpede(kalie, rajeev)\nImpede(kalie, pearle)\nProvincial(kalie)\nHewn(kalie)\nExposit(kalie, rajeev)\nHumidify(kalie, rajeev)\nImpede(pearle, rajeev)\nExposit(pearle, kalie)\nHumidify(rajeev, kalie) -> Impede(kalie, rajeev)\nforall x (Humidify(x, pearle) and Exposit(pearle, kalie) -> Earthen(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Hewn(x))\nforall x (Exposit(x, pearle) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Exposit(x, kalie) -> Exposit(x, pearle))\nforall x (Impede(x, kalie) and Algonquian(x) -> Algonquian(kalie))\nforall x (Algonquian(x) and Exposit(x, rajeev) -> Impede(rajeev, pearle))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Exposit(x, kalie))\n\nImpede(rajeev, kalie)\n\nImpede(rajeev, kalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The dedra miscreate the suzi. The dedra miscreate the jaquelin. The dedra disfavour the edna. The suzi is canty. The suzi is equitable. The suzi miscreate the dedra. The suzi tinsel the edna. The edna is written. The edna miscreate the dedra. The edna miscreate the suzi. The edna disfavour the suzi. The jaquelin is written. The jaquelin miscreate the edna. The jaquelin disfavour the edna. The jaquelin tinsel the dedra. The jaquelin tinsel the edna. If the edna tinsel the dedra then the dedra miscreate the suzi. If the edna disfavour the dedra and the edna miscreate the suzi then the suzi is stoic. If something disfavour the dedra then it is written. If something tinsel the jaquelin and it disfavour the edna then it is stoic. If the edna disfavour the suzi then the suzi miscreate the edna. If the edna tinsel the suzi then the edna miscreate the dedra. If something miscreate the edna then it disfavour the dedra. If the dedra is canty then the dedra miscreate the edna. The suzi is equitable.", "logic": "\nMiscreate(dedra, suzi)\nMiscreate(dedra, jaquelin)\nDisfavour(dedra, edna)\nCanty(suzi)\nEquitable(suzi)\nMiscreate(suzi, dedra)\nTinsel(suzi, edna)\nWritten(edna)\nMiscreate(edna, dedra)\nMiscreate(edna, suzi)\nDisfavour(edna, suzi)\nWritten(jaquelin)\nMiscreate(jaquelin, edna)\nDisfavour(jaquelin, edna)\nTinsel(jaquelin, dedra)\nTinsel(jaquelin, edna)\nTinsel(edna, dedra) -> Miscreate(dedra, suzi)\nDisfavour(edna, dedra) and Miscreate(edna, suzi) -> Stoic(suzi)\nforall x (Disfavour(x, dedra) -> Written(x))\nforall x (Tinsel(x, jaquelin) and Disfavour(x, edna) -> Stoic(x))\nDisfavour(edna, suzi) -> Miscreate(suzi, edna)\nTinsel(edna, suzi) -> Miscreate(edna, dedra)\nforall x (Miscreate(x, edna) -> Disfavour(x, dedra))\nCanty(dedra) -> Miscreate(dedra, edna)\n\nEquitable(suzi)\n\ntherefore Equitable(suzi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The giacinta emblazon the nicoli. The giacinta emblazon the kaile. The giacinta immingle the carolyne. The nicoli is archean. The nicoli is blighted. The nicoli emblazon the giacinta. The nicoli glamourize the carolyne. The carolyne is faded. The carolyne emblazon the giacinta. The carolyne emblazon the nicoli. The carolyne immingle the nicoli. The kaile is faded. The kaile emblazon the carolyne. The kaile immingle the carolyne. The kaile glamourize the giacinta. The kaile glamourize the carolyne. If the carolyne glamourize the giacinta then the giacinta emblazon the nicoli. If the carolyne immingle the giacinta and the carolyne emblazon the nicoli then the nicoli is acrobatic. If something immingle the giacinta then it is faded. If something glamourize the kaile and it immingle the carolyne then it is acrobatic. If the carolyne immingle the nicoli then the nicoli emblazon the carolyne. If the carolyne glamourize the nicoli then the carolyne emblazon the giacinta. If something emblazon the carolyne then it immingle the giacinta. If the giacinta is archean then the giacinta emblazon the carolyne. The kaile does not need the carolyne.", "logic": "\nEmblazon(giacinta, nicoli)\nEmblazon(giacinta, kaile)\nImmingle(giacinta, carolyne)\nArchean(nicoli)\nBlighted(nicoli)\nEmblazon(nicoli, giacinta)\nGlamourize(nicoli, carolyne)\nFaded(carolyne)\nEmblazon(carolyne, giacinta)\nEmblazon(carolyne, nicoli)\nImmingle(carolyne, nicoli)\nFaded(kaile)\nEmblazon(kaile, carolyne)\nImmingle(kaile, carolyne)\nGlamourize(kaile, giacinta)\nGlamourize(kaile, carolyne)\nGlamourize(carolyne, giacinta) -> Emblazon(giacinta, nicoli)\nImmingle(carolyne, giacinta) and Emblazon(carolyne, nicoli) -> Acrobatic(nicoli)\nforall x (Immingle(x, giacinta) -> Faded(x))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, kaile) and Immingle(x, carolyne) -> Acrobatic(x))\nImmingle(carolyne, nicoli) -> Emblazon(nicoli, carolyne)\nGlamourize(carolyne, nicoli) -> Emblazon(carolyne, giacinta)\nforall x (Emblazon(x, carolyne) -> Immingle(x, giacinta))\nArchean(giacinta) -> Emblazon(giacinta, carolyne)\n\nnot Emblazon(kaile, carolyne)\n\ntherefore Emblazon(kaile, carolyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The bela conk the gert. The bela conk the korrie. The bela unmake the tally. The gert is brimless. The gert is shaved. The gert conk the bela. The gert boss the tally. The tally is alpestrine. The tally conk the bela. The tally conk the gert. The tally unmake the gert. The korrie is alpestrine. The korrie conk the tally. The korrie unmake the tally. The korrie boss the bela. The korrie boss the tally. If the tally boss the bela then the bela conk the gert. If the tally unmake the bela and the tally conk the gert then the gert is looted. If something unmake the bela then it is alpestrine. If something boss the korrie and it unmake the tally then it is looted. If the tally unmake the gert then the gert conk the tally. If the tally boss the gert then the tally conk the bela. If something conk the tally then it unmake the bela. If the bela is brimless then the bela conk the tally. The gert conk the tally.", "logic": "\nConk(bela, gert)\nConk(bela, korrie)\nUnmake(bela, tally)\nBrimless(gert)\nShaved(gert)\nConk(gert, bela)\nBoss(gert, tally)\nAlpestrine(tally)\nConk(tally, bela)\nConk(tally, gert)\nUnmake(tally, gert)\nAlpestrine(korrie)\nConk(korrie, tally)\nUnmake(korrie, tally)\nBoss(korrie, bela)\nBoss(korrie, tally)\nBoss(tally, bela) -> Conk(bela, gert)\nUnmake(tally, bela) and Conk(tally, gert) -> Looted(gert)\nforall x (Unmake(x, bela) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Boss(x, korrie) and Unmake(x, tally) -> Looted(x))\nUnmake(tally, gert) -> Conk(gert, tally)\nBoss(tally, gert) -> Conk(tally, bela)\nforall x (Conk(x, tally) -> Unmake(x, bela))\nBrimless(bela) -> Conk(bela, tally)\n\nConk(gert, tally)\n\nUnmake(tally, gert) and Unmake(tally, gert) -> Conk(gert, tally) -> therefore Conk(gert, tally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The trudy depolarize the fifine. The trudy depolarize the vassili. The trudy keen the stormie. The fifine is unposed. The fifine is calm. The fifine depolarize the trudy. The fifine posit the stormie. The stormie is trifling. The stormie depolarize the trudy. The stormie depolarize the fifine. The stormie keen the fifine. The vassili is trifling. The vassili depolarize the stormie. The vassili keen the stormie. The vassili posit the trudy. The vassili posit the stormie. If the stormie posit the trudy then the trudy depolarize the fifine. If the stormie keen the trudy and the stormie depolarize the fifine then the fifine is english. If something keen the trudy then it is trifling. If something posit the vassili and it keen the stormie then it is english. If the stormie keen the fifine then the fifine depolarize the stormie. If the stormie posit the fifine then the stormie depolarize the trudy. If something depolarize the stormie then it keen the trudy. If the trudy is unposed then the trudy depolarize the stormie. The vassili does not see the trudy.", "logic": "\nDepolarize(trudy, fifine)\nDepolarize(trudy, vassili)\nKeen(trudy, stormie)\nUnposed(fifine)\nCalm(fifine)\nDepolarize(fifine, trudy)\nPosit(fifine, stormie)\nTrifling(stormie)\nDepolarize(stormie, trudy)\nDepolarize(stormie, fifine)\nKeen(stormie, fifine)\nTrifling(vassili)\nDepolarize(vassili, stormie)\nKeen(vassili, stormie)\nPosit(vassili, trudy)\nPosit(vassili, stormie)\nPosit(stormie, trudy) -> Depolarize(trudy, fifine)\nKeen(stormie, trudy) and Depolarize(stormie, fifine) -> English(fifine)\nforall x (Keen(x, trudy) -> Trifling(x))\nforall x (Posit(x, vassili) and Keen(x, stormie) -> English(x))\nKeen(stormie, fifine) -> Depolarize(fifine, stormie)\nPosit(stormie, fifine) -> Depolarize(stormie, trudy)\nforall x (Depolarize(x, stormie) -> Keen(x, trudy))\nUnposed(trudy) -> Depolarize(trudy, stormie)\n\nnot Keen(vassili, trudy)\n\nDepolarize(vassili, stormie) and forall x (Depolarize(x, stormie) -> Keen(x, trudy)) -> therefore Keen(vassili, trudy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The keene modify the jerome. The keene modify the goldina. The keene unbraid the adolpho. The jerome is pockmarked. The jerome is blank. The jerome modify the keene. The jerome persevere the adolpho. The adolpho is trilobated. The adolpho modify the keene. The adolpho modify the jerome. The adolpho unbraid the jerome. The goldina is trilobated. The goldina modify the adolpho. The goldina unbraid the adolpho. The goldina persevere the keene. The goldina persevere the adolpho. If the adolpho persevere the keene then the keene modify the jerome. If the adolpho unbraid the keene and the adolpho modify the jerome then the jerome is willing. If something unbraid the keene then it is trilobated. If something persevere the goldina and it unbraid the adolpho then it is willing. If the adolpho unbraid the jerome then the jerome modify the adolpho. If the adolpho persevere the jerome then the adolpho modify the keene. If something modify the adolpho then it unbraid the keene. If the keene is pockmarked then the keene modify the adolpho. The jerome unbraid the keene.", "logic": "\nModify(keene, jerome)\nModify(keene, goldina)\nUnbraid(keene, adolpho)\nPockmarked(jerome)\nBlank(jerome)\nModify(jerome, keene)\nPersevere(jerome, adolpho)\nTrilobated(adolpho)\nModify(adolpho, keene)\nModify(adolpho, jerome)\nUnbraid(adolpho, jerome)\nTrilobated(goldina)\nModify(goldina, adolpho)\nUnbraid(goldina, adolpho)\nPersevere(goldina, keene)\nPersevere(goldina, adolpho)\nPersevere(adolpho, keene) -> Modify(keene, jerome)\nUnbraid(adolpho, keene) and Modify(adolpho, jerome) -> Willing(jerome)\nforall x (Unbraid(x, keene) -> Trilobated(x))\nforall x (Persevere(x, goldina) and Unbraid(x, adolpho) -> Willing(x))\nUnbraid(adolpho, jerome) -> Modify(jerome, adolpho)\nPersevere(adolpho, jerome) -> Modify(adolpho, keene)\nforall x (Modify(x, adolpho) -> Unbraid(x, keene))\nPockmarked(keene) -> Modify(keene, adolpho)\n\nUnbraid(jerome, keene)\n\nUnbraid(adolpho, jerome) and Unbraid(adolpho, jerome) -> Modify(jerome, adolpho) -> therefore Modify(jerome, adolpho) Modify(jerome, adolpho) and forall x (Modify(x, adolpho) -> Unbraid(x, keene)) -> therefore Unbraid(jerome, keene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The leesa fence the marga. The leesa fence the chauncey. The leesa sizz the bogdan. The marga is georgian. The marga is narrowed. The marga fence the leesa. The marga gossip the bogdan. The bogdan is venal. The bogdan fence the leesa. The bogdan fence the marga. The bogdan sizz the marga. The chauncey is venal. The chauncey fence the bogdan. The chauncey sizz the bogdan. The chauncey gossip the leesa. The chauncey gossip the bogdan. If the bogdan gossip the leesa then the leesa fence the marga. If the bogdan sizz the leesa and the bogdan fence the marga then the marga is continuous. If something sizz the leesa then it is venal. If something gossip the chauncey and it sizz the bogdan then it is continuous. If the bogdan sizz the marga then the marga fence the bogdan. If the bogdan gossip the marga then the bogdan fence the leesa. If something fence the bogdan then it sizz the leesa. If the leesa is georgian then the leesa fence the bogdan. The marga does not see the leesa.", "logic": "\nFence(leesa, marga)\nFence(leesa, chauncey)\nSizz(leesa, bogdan)\nGeorgian(marga)\nNarrowed(marga)\nFence(marga, leesa)\nGossip(marga, bogdan)\nVenal(bogdan)\nFence(bogdan, leesa)\nFence(bogdan, marga)\nSizz(bogdan, marga)\nVenal(chauncey)\nFence(chauncey, bogdan)\nSizz(chauncey, bogdan)\nGossip(chauncey, leesa)\nGossip(chauncey, bogdan)\nGossip(bogdan, leesa) -> Fence(leesa, marga)\nSizz(bogdan, leesa) and Fence(bogdan, marga) -> Continuous(marga)\nforall x (Sizz(x, leesa) -> Venal(x))\nforall x (Gossip(x, chauncey) and Sizz(x, bogdan) -> Continuous(x))\nSizz(bogdan, marga) -> Fence(marga, bogdan)\nGossip(bogdan, marga) -> Fence(bogdan, leesa)\nforall x (Fence(x, bogdan) -> Sizz(x, leesa))\nGeorgian(leesa) -> Fence(leesa, bogdan)\n\nnot Sizz(marga, leesa)\n\nSizz(bogdan, marga) and Sizz(bogdan, marga) -> Fence(marga, bogdan) -> therefore Fence(marga, bogdan) Fence(marga, bogdan) and forall x (Fence(x, bogdan) -> Sizz(x, leesa)) -> therefore Sizz(marga, leesa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The gredel moult the reena. The gredel moult the aida. The gredel slough the marcus. The reena is salty. The reena is redemptory. The reena moult the gredel. The reena equalize the marcus. The marcus is despotical. The marcus moult the gredel. The marcus moult the reena. The marcus slough the reena. The aida is despotical. The aida moult the marcus. The aida slough the marcus. The aida equalize the gredel. The aida equalize the marcus. If the marcus equalize the gredel then the gredel moult the reena. If the marcus slough the gredel and the marcus moult the reena then the reena is tensional. If something slough the gredel then it is despotical. If something equalize the aida and it slough the marcus then it is tensional. If the marcus slough the reena then the reena moult the marcus. If the marcus equalize the reena then the marcus moult the gredel. If something moult the marcus then it slough the gredel. If the gredel is salty then the gredel moult the marcus. The reena is despotical.", "logic": "\nMoult(gredel, reena)\nMoult(gredel, aida)\nSlough(gredel, marcus)\nSalty(reena)\nRedemptory(reena)\nMoult(reena, gredel)\nEqualize(reena, marcus)\nDespotical(marcus)\nMoult(marcus, gredel)\nMoult(marcus, reena)\nSlough(marcus, reena)\nDespotical(aida)\nMoult(aida, marcus)\nSlough(aida, marcus)\nEqualize(aida, gredel)\nEqualize(aida, marcus)\nEqualize(marcus, gredel) -> Moult(gredel, reena)\nSlough(marcus, gredel) and Moult(marcus, reena) -> Tensional(reena)\nforall x (Slough(x, gredel) -> Despotical(x))\nforall x (Equalize(x, aida) and Slough(x, marcus) -> Tensional(x))\nSlough(marcus, reena) -> Moult(reena, marcus)\nEqualize(marcus, reena) -> Moult(marcus, gredel)\nforall x (Moult(x, marcus) -> Slough(x, gredel))\nSalty(gredel) -> Moult(gredel, marcus)\n\nDespotical(reena)\n\nSlough(marcus, reena) and Slough(marcus, reena) -> Moult(reena, marcus) -> therefore Moult(reena, marcus) Moult(reena, marcus) and forall x (Moult(x, marcus) -> Slough(x, gredel)) -> therefore Slough(reena, gredel) Slough(reena, gredel) and forall x (Slough(x, gredel) -> Despotical(x)) -> therefore Despotical(reena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The sabrina sire the dew. The sabrina sire the rice. The sabrina bill the ciel. The dew is disliked. The dew is geodesic. The dew sire the sabrina. The dew trade the ciel. The ciel is crotchety. The ciel sire the sabrina. The ciel sire the dew. The ciel bill the dew. The rice is crotchety. The rice sire the ciel. The rice bill the ciel. The rice trade the sabrina. The rice trade the ciel. If the ciel trade the sabrina then the sabrina sire the dew. If the ciel bill the sabrina and the ciel sire the dew then the dew is pearly. If something bill the sabrina then it is crotchety. If something trade the rice and it bill the ciel then it is pearly. If the ciel bill the dew then the dew sire the ciel. If the ciel trade the dew then the ciel sire the sabrina. If something sire the ciel then it bill the sabrina. If the sabrina is disliked then the sabrina sire the ciel. The dew is not crotchety.", "logic": "\nSire(sabrina, dew)\nSire(sabrina, rice)\nBill(sabrina, ciel)\nDisliked(dew)\nGeodesic(dew)\nSire(dew, sabrina)\nTrade(dew, ciel)\nCrotchety(ciel)\nSire(ciel, sabrina)\nSire(ciel, dew)\nBill(ciel, dew)\nCrotchety(rice)\nSire(rice, ciel)\nBill(rice, ciel)\nTrade(rice, sabrina)\nTrade(rice, ciel)\nTrade(ciel, sabrina) -> Sire(sabrina, dew)\nBill(ciel, sabrina) and Sire(ciel, dew) -> Pearly(dew)\nforall x (Bill(x, sabrina) -> Crotchety(x))\nforall x (Trade(x, rice) and Bill(x, ciel) -> Pearly(x))\nBill(ciel, dew) -> Sire(dew, ciel)\nTrade(ciel, dew) -> Sire(ciel, sabrina)\nforall x (Sire(x, ciel) -> Bill(x, sabrina))\nDisliked(sabrina) -> Sire(sabrina, ciel)\n\nnot Crotchety(dew)\n\nBill(ciel, dew) and Bill(ciel, dew) -> Sire(dew, ciel) -> therefore Sire(dew, ciel) Sire(dew, ciel) and forall x (Sire(x, ciel) -> Bill(x, sabrina)) -> therefore Bill(dew, sabrina) Bill(dew, sabrina) and forall x (Bill(x, sabrina) -> Crotchety(x)) -> therefore Crotchety(dew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The nevsa desist the elton. The nevsa desist the carl. The nevsa scraunch the agnella. The elton is booming. The elton is bryophytic. The elton desist the nevsa. The elton alkalify the agnella. The agnella is unrewarded. The agnella desist the nevsa. The agnella desist the elton. The agnella scraunch the elton. The carl is unrewarded. The carl desist the agnella. The carl scraunch the agnella. The carl alkalify the nevsa. The carl alkalify the agnella. If the agnella alkalify the nevsa then the nevsa desist the elton. If the agnella scraunch the nevsa and the agnella desist the elton then the elton is euphonous. If something scraunch the nevsa then it is unrewarded. If something alkalify the carl and it scraunch the agnella then it is euphonous. If the agnella scraunch the elton then the elton desist the agnella. If the agnella alkalify the elton then the agnella desist the nevsa. If something desist the agnella then it scraunch the nevsa. If the nevsa is booming then the nevsa desist the agnella. The agnella does not see the nevsa.", "logic": "\nDesist(nevsa, elton)\nDesist(nevsa, carl)\nScraunch(nevsa, agnella)\nBooming(elton)\nBryophytic(elton)\nDesist(elton, nevsa)\nAlkalify(elton, agnella)\nUnrewarded(agnella)\nDesist(agnella, nevsa)\nDesist(agnella, elton)\nScraunch(agnella, elton)\nUnrewarded(carl)\nDesist(carl, agnella)\nScraunch(carl, agnella)\nAlkalify(carl, nevsa)\nAlkalify(carl, agnella)\nAlkalify(agnella, nevsa) -> Desist(nevsa, elton)\nScraunch(agnella, nevsa) and Desist(agnella, elton) -> Euphonous(elton)\nforall x (Scraunch(x, nevsa) -> Unrewarded(x))\nforall x (Alkalify(x, carl) and Scraunch(x, agnella) -> Euphonous(x))\nScraunch(agnella, elton) -> Desist(elton, agnella)\nAlkalify(agnella, elton) -> Desist(agnella, nevsa)\nforall x (Desist(x, agnella) -> Scraunch(x, nevsa))\nBooming(nevsa) -> Desist(nevsa, agnella)\n\nnot Scraunch(agnella, nevsa)\n\nforall x (Desist(x, agnella) -> Scraunch(x, nevsa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The stillman admix the annmarie. The stillman admix the adolfo. The stillman muss the cornelle. The annmarie is weepy. The annmarie is thronged. The annmarie admix the stillman. The annmarie lyophilize the cornelle. The cornelle is bigoted. The cornelle admix the stillman. The cornelle admix the annmarie. The cornelle muss the annmarie. The adolfo is bigoted. The adolfo admix the cornelle. The adolfo muss the cornelle. The adolfo lyophilize the stillman. The adolfo lyophilize the cornelle. If the cornelle lyophilize the stillman then the stillman admix the annmarie. If the cornelle muss the stillman and the cornelle admix the annmarie then the annmarie is capital. If something muss the stillman then it is bigoted. If something lyophilize the adolfo and it muss the cornelle then it is capital. If the cornelle muss the annmarie then the annmarie admix the cornelle. If the cornelle lyophilize the annmarie then the cornelle admix the stillman. If something admix the cornelle then it muss the stillman. If the stillman is weepy then the stillman admix the cornelle. The stillman is bigoted.", "logic": "\nAdmix(stillman, annmarie)\nAdmix(stillman, adolfo)\nMuss(stillman, cornelle)\nWeepy(annmarie)\nThronged(annmarie)\nAdmix(annmarie, stillman)\nLyophilize(annmarie, cornelle)\nBigoted(cornelle)\nAdmix(cornelle, stillman)\nAdmix(cornelle, annmarie)\nMuss(cornelle, annmarie)\nBigoted(adolfo)\nAdmix(adolfo, cornelle)\nMuss(adolfo, cornelle)\nLyophilize(adolfo, stillman)\nLyophilize(adolfo, cornelle)\nLyophilize(cornelle, stillman) -> Admix(stillman, annmarie)\nMuss(cornelle, stillman) and Admix(cornelle, annmarie) -> Capital(annmarie)\nforall x (Muss(x, stillman) -> Bigoted(x))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, adolfo) and Muss(x, cornelle) -> Capital(x))\nMuss(cornelle, annmarie) -> Admix(annmarie, cornelle)\nLyophilize(cornelle, annmarie) -> Admix(cornelle, stillman)\nforall x (Admix(x, cornelle) -> Muss(x, stillman))\nWeepy(stillman) -> Admix(stillman, cornelle)\n\nBigoted(stillman)\n\nforall x (Muss(x, stillman) -> Bigoted(x)) <- forall x (Admix(x, cornelle) -> Muss(x, stillman)) <- Weepy(stillman) -> Admix(stillman, cornelle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The brandie busk the cosmo. The brandie busk the renard. The brandie fair the kay. The cosmo is monastical. The cosmo is abuzz. The cosmo busk the brandie. The cosmo hiss the kay. The kay is freewill. The kay busk the brandie. The kay busk the cosmo. The kay fair the cosmo. The renard is freewill. The renard busk the kay. The renard fair the kay. The renard hiss the brandie. The renard hiss the kay. If the kay hiss the brandie then the brandie busk the cosmo. If the kay fair the brandie and the kay busk the cosmo then the cosmo is huge. If something fair the brandie then it is freewill. If something hiss the renard and it fair the kay then it is huge. If the kay fair the cosmo then the cosmo busk the kay. If the kay hiss the cosmo then the kay busk the brandie. If something busk the kay then it fair the brandie. If the brandie is monastical then the brandie busk the kay. The cosmo is not huge.", "logic": "\nBusk(brandie, cosmo)\nBusk(brandie, renard)\nFair(brandie, kay)\nMonastical(cosmo)\nAbuzz(cosmo)\nBusk(cosmo, brandie)\nHiss(cosmo, kay)\nFreewill(kay)\nBusk(kay, brandie)\nBusk(kay, cosmo)\nFair(kay, cosmo)\nFreewill(renard)\nBusk(renard, kay)\nFair(renard, kay)\nHiss(renard, brandie)\nHiss(renard, kay)\nHiss(kay, brandie) -> Busk(brandie, cosmo)\nFair(kay, brandie) and Busk(kay, cosmo) -> Huge(cosmo)\nforall x (Fair(x, brandie) -> Freewill(x))\nforall x (Hiss(x, renard) and Fair(x, kay) -> Huge(x))\nFair(kay, cosmo) -> Busk(cosmo, kay)\nHiss(kay, cosmo) -> Busk(kay, brandie)\nforall x (Busk(x, kay) -> Fair(x, brandie))\nMonastical(brandie) -> Busk(brandie, kay)\n\nnot Huge(cosmo)\n\nFair(kay, brandie) and Busk(kay, cosmo) -> Huge(cosmo) <- forall x (Busk(x, kay) -> Fair(x, brandie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The huey larn the lucita. The huey larn the shepperd. The huey white the karmen. The lucita is tripartite. The lucita is hydrous. The lucita larn the huey. The lucita blacklist the karmen. The karmen is radical. The karmen larn the huey. The karmen larn the lucita. The karmen white the lucita. The shepperd is radical. The shepperd larn the karmen. The shepperd white the karmen. The shepperd blacklist the huey. The shepperd blacklist the karmen. If the karmen blacklist the huey then the huey larn the lucita. If the karmen white the huey and the karmen larn the lucita then the lucita is cenobitic. If something white the huey then it is radical. If something blacklist the shepperd and it white the karmen then it is cenobitic. If the karmen white the lucita then the lucita larn the karmen. If the karmen blacklist the lucita then the karmen larn the huey. If something larn the karmen then it white the huey. If the huey is tripartite then the huey larn the karmen. The karmen is cenobitic.", "logic": "\nLarn(huey, lucita)\nLarn(huey, shepperd)\nWhite(huey, karmen)\nTripartite(lucita)\nHydrous(lucita)\nLarn(lucita, huey)\nBlacklist(lucita, karmen)\nRadical(karmen)\nLarn(karmen, huey)\nLarn(karmen, lucita)\nWhite(karmen, lucita)\nRadical(shepperd)\nLarn(shepperd, karmen)\nWhite(shepperd, karmen)\nBlacklist(shepperd, huey)\nBlacklist(shepperd, karmen)\nBlacklist(karmen, huey) -> Larn(huey, lucita)\nWhite(karmen, huey) and Larn(karmen, lucita) -> Cenobitic(lucita)\nforall x (White(x, huey) -> Radical(x))\nforall x (Blacklist(x, shepperd) and White(x, karmen) -> Cenobitic(x))\nWhite(karmen, lucita) -> Larn(lucita, karmen)\nBlacklist(karmen, lucita) -> Larn(karmen, huey)\nforall x (Larn(x, karmen) -> White(x, huey))\nTripartite(huey) -> Larn(huey, karmen)\n\nCenobitic(karmen)\n\nforall x (Blacklist(x, shepperd) and White(x, karmen) -> Cenobitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The paloma condone the anjela. The paloma condone the lamb. The paloma overfeed the leona. The anjela is jaundiced. The anjela is rustic. The anjela condone the paloma. The anjela benficiate the leona. The leona is detergent. The leona condone the paloma. The leona condone the anjela. The leona overfeed the anjela. The lamb is detergent. The lamb condone the leona. The lamb overfeed the leona. The lamb benficiate the paloma. The lamb benficiate the leona. If the leona benficiate the paloma then the paloma condone the anjela. If the leona overfeed the paloma and the leona condone the anjela then the anjela is careless. If something overfeed the paloma then it is detergent. If something benficiate the lamb and it overfeed the leona then it is careless. If the leona overfeed the anjela then the anjela condone the leona. If the leona benficiate the anjela then the leona condone the paloma. If something condone the leona then it overfeed the paloma. If the paloma is jaundiced then the paloma condone the leona. The anjela does not see the anjela.", "logic": "\nCondone(paloma, anjela)\nCondone(paloma, lamb)\nOverfeed(paloma, leona)\nJaundiced(anjela)\nRustic(anjela)\nCondone(anjela, paloma)\nBenficiate(anjela, leona)\nDetergent(leona)\nCondone(leona, paloma)\nCondone(leona, anjela)\nOverfeed(leona, anjela)\nDetergent(lamb)\nCondone(lamb, leona)\nOverfeed(lamb, leona)\nBenficiate(lamb, paloma)\nBenficiate(lamb, leona)\nBenficiate(leona, paloma) -> Condone(paloma, anjela)\nOverfeed(leona, paloma) and Condone(leona, anjela) -> Careless(anjela)\nforall x (Overfeed(x, paloma) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Benficiate(x, lamb) and Overfeed(x, leona) -> Careless(x))\nOverfeed(leona, anjela) -> Condone(anjela, leona)\nBenficiate(leona, anjela) -> Condone(leona, paloma)\nforall x (Condone(x, leona) -> Overfeed(x, paloma))\nJaundiced(paloma) -> Condone(paloma, leona)\n\nnot Overfeed(anjela, anjela)\n\nnot Overfeed(anjela, anjela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The merla socialise the ragnhild. The merla socialise the cathrine. The merla streak the carlynne. The ragnhild is rocklike. The ragnhild is twelfth. The ragnhild socialise the merla. The ragnhild trawl the carlynne. The carlynne is evocative. The carlynne socialise the merla. The carlynne socialise the ragnhild. The carlynne streak the ragnhild. The cathrine is evocative. The cathrine socialise the carlynne. The cathrine streak the carlynne. The cathrine trawl the merla. The cathrine trawl the carlynne. If the carlynne trawl the merla then the merla socialise the ragnhild. If the carlynne streak the merla and the carlynne socialise the ragnhild then the ragnhild is delightful. If something streak the merla then it is evocative. If something trawl the cathrine and it streak the carlynne then it is delightful. If the carlynne streak the ragnhild then the ragnhild socialise the carlynne. If the carlynne trawl the ragnhild then the carlynne socialise the merla. If something socialise the carlynne then it streak the merla. If the merla is rocklike then the merla socialise the carlynne. The merla streak the cathrine.", "logic": "\nSocialise(merla, ragnhild)\nSocialise(merla, cathrine)\nStreak(merla, carlynne)\nRocklike(ragnhild)\nTwelfth(ragnhild)\nSocialise(ragnhild, merla)\nTrawl(ragnhild, carlynne)\nEvocative(carlynne)\nSocialise(carlynne, merla)\nSocialise(carlynne, ragnhild)\nStreak(carlynne, ragnhild)\nEvocative(cathrine)\nSocialise(cathrine, carlynne)\nStreak(cathrine, carlynne)\nTrawl(cathrine, merla)\nTrawl(cathrine, carlynne)\nTrawl(carlynne, merla) -> Socialise(merla, ragnhild)\nStreak(carlynne, merla) and Socialise(carlynne, ragnhild) -> Delightful(ragnhild)\nforall x (Streak(x, merla) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Trawl(x, cathrine) and Streak(x, carlynne) -> Delightful(x))\nStreak(carlynne, ragnhild) -> Socialise(ragnhild, carlynne)\nTrawl(carlynne, ragnhild) -> Socialise(carlynne, merla)\nforall x (Socialise(x, carlynne) -> Streak(x, merla))\nRocklike(merla) -> Socialise(merla, carlynne)\n\nStreak(merla, cathrine)\n\nStreak(merla, cathrine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The cristabel refit the matteo. The cristabel refit the tuesday. The cristabel ablactate the reinhold. The matteo is overblown. The matteo is rippled. The matteo refit the cristabel. The matteo rebuild the reinhold. The reinhold is limbic. The reinhold refit the cristabel. The reinhold refit the matteo. The reinhold ablactate the matteo. The tuesday is limbic. The tuesday refit the reinhold. The tuesday ablactate the reinhold. The tuesday rebuild the cristabel. The tuesday rebuild the reinhold. If the reinhold rebuild the cristabel then the cristabel refit the matteo. If the reinhold ablactate the cristabel and the reinhold refit the matteo then the matteo is maiden. If something ablactate the cristabel then it is limbic. If something rebuild the tuesday and it ablactate the reinhold then it is maiden. If the reinhold ablactate the matteo then the matteo refit the reinhold. If the reinhold rebuild the matteo then the reinhold refit the cristabel. If something refit the reinhold then it ablactate the cristabel. If the cristabel is overblown then the cristabel refit the reinhold. The reinhold does not visit the cristabel.", "logic": "\nRefit(cristabel, matteo)\nRefit(cristabel, tuesday)\nAblactate(cristabel, reinhold)\nOverblown(matteo)\nRippled(matteo)\nRefit(matteo, cristabel)\nRebuild(matteo, reinhold)\nLimbic(reinhold)\nRefit(reinhold, cristabel)\nRefit(reinhold, matteo)\nAblactate(reinhold, matteo)\nLimbic(tuesday)\nRefit(tuesday, reinhold)\nAblactate(tuesday, reinhold)\nRebuild(tuesday, cristabel)\nRebuild(tuesday, reinhold)\nRebuild(reinhold, cristabel) -> Refit(cristabel, matteo)\nAblactate(reinhold, cristabel) and Refit(reinhold, matteo) -> Maiden(matteo)\nforall x (Ablactate(x, cristabel) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, tuesday) and Ablactate(x, reinhold) -> Maiden(x))\nAblactate(reinhold, matteo) -> Refit(matteo, reinhold)\nRebuild(reinhold, matteo) -> Refit(reinhold, cristabel)\nforall x (Refit(x, reinhold) -> Ablactate(x, cristabel))\nOverblown(cristabel) -> Refit(cristabel, reinhold)\n\nnot Rebuild(reinhold, cristabel)\n\nnot Rebuild(reinhold, cristabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The elijah crown the devan. The elijah crown the susan. The elijah slat the marv. The devan is wobbly. The devan is conventual. The devan crown the elijah. The devan neaten the marv. The marv is foreign. The marv crown the elijah. The marv crown the devan. The marv slat the devan. The susan is foreign. The susan crown the marv. The susan slat the marv. The susan neaten the elijah. The susan neaten the marv. If the marv neaten the elijah then the elijah crown the devan. If the marv slat the elijah and the marv crown the devan then the devan is unborn. If something slat the elijah then it is foreign. If something neaten the susan and it slat the marv then it is unborn. If the marv slat the devan then the devan crown the marv. If the marv neaten the devan then the marv crown the elijah. If something crown the marv then it slat the elijah. If the elijah is wobbly then the elijah crown the marv. The marv slat the susan.", "logic": "\nCrown(elijah, devan)\nCrown(elijah, susan)\nSlat(elijah, marv)\nWobbly(devan)\nConventual(devan)\nCrown(devan, elijah)\nNeaten(devan, marv)\nForeign(marv)\nCrown(marv, elijah)\nCrown(marv, devan)\nSlat(marv, devan)\nForeign(susan)\nCrown(susan, marv)\nSlat(susan, marv)\nNeaten(susan, elijah)\nNeaten(susan, marv)\nNeaten(marv, elijah) -> Crown(elijah, devan)\nSlat(marv, elijah) and Crown(marv, devan) -> Unborn(devan)\nforall x (Slat(x, elijah) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Neaten(x, susan) and Slat(x, marv) -> Unborn(x))\nSlat(marv, devan) -> Crown(devan, marv)\nNeaten(marv, devan) -> Crown(marv, elijah)\nforall x (Crown(x, marv) -> Slat(x, elijah))\nWobbly(elijah) -> Crown(elijah, marv)\n\nSlat(marv, susan)\n\nSlat(marv, susan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "Angelica is chicken. Alanna is boylike. Babita is not boylike. If Babita is not boylike then Babita is serous. If something is aguish and not chicken then it is catarrhal. If something is catarrhal and boylike then it is oozy. If something is unfertile then it is oozy. If Angelica is oozy then Angelica is serous. Kind things are unfertile. Angelica is chicken.", "logic": "\nChicken(angelica)\nBoylike(alanna)\nnot Boylike(babita)\nnot Boylike(babita) -> Serous(babita)\nforall x (Aguish(x) and not Chicken(x) -> Catarrhal(x))\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) and Boylike(x) -> Oozy(x))\nforall x (Unfertile(x) -> Oozy(x))\nOozy(angelica) -> Serous(angelica)\nforall x (Serous(x) -> Unfertile(x))\n\nChicken(angelica)\n\ntherefore Chicken(angelica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Sylvester is cyclic. Camila is pareve. Lila is not pareve. If Lila is not pareve then Lila is cranky. If something is soggy and not cyclic then it is silicious. If something is silicious and pareve then it is unrevived. If something is ritenuto then it is unrevived. If Sylvester is unrevived then Sylvester is cranky. Kind things are ritenuto. Lila is pareve.", "logic": "\nCyclic(sylvester)\nPareve(camila)\nnot Pareve(lila)\nnot Pareve(lila) -> Cranky(lila)\nforall x (Soggy(x) and not Cyclic(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Pareve(x) -> Unrevived(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) -> Unrevived(x))\nUnrevived(sylvester) -> Cranky(sylvester)\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\n\nPareve(lila)\n\ntherefore not Pareve(lila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Kaylil is unsaved. Dorelle is crank. Ambrosia is not crank. If Ambrosia is not crank then Ambrosia is wandering. If something is copacetic and not unsaved then it is adaptative. If something is adaptative and crank then it is downlike. If something is resentful then it is downlike. If Kaylil is downlike then Kaylil is wandering. Kind things are resentful. Ambrosia is wandering.", "logic": "\nUnsaved(kaylil)\nCrank(dorelle)\nnot Crank(ambrosia)\nnot Crank(ambrosia) -> Wandering(ambrosia)\nforall x (Copacetic(x) and not Unsaved(x) -> Adaptative(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and Crank(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Resentful(x) -> Downlike(x))\nDownlike(kaylil) -> Wandering(kaylil)\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> Resentful(x))\n\nWandering(ambrosia)\n\nnot Crank(ambrosia) and not Crank(ambrosia) -> Wandering(ambrosia) -> therefore Wandering(ambrosia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Shirley is warm. Oral is javanese. Manny is not javanese. If Manny is not javanese then Manny is vapourised. If something is activistic and not warm then it is amylolytic. If something is amylolytic and javanese then it is charged. If something is comburant then it is charged. If Shirley is charged then Shirley is vapourised. Kind things are comburant. Manny is not vapourised.", "logic": "\nWarm(shirley)\nJavanese(oral)\nnot Javanese(manny)\nnot Javanese(manny) -> Vapourised(manny)\nforall x (Activistic(x) and not Warm(x) -> Amylolytic(x))\nforall x (Amylolytic(x) and Javanese(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Comburant(x) -> Charged(x))\nCharged(shirley) -> Vapourised(shirley)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Comburant(x))\n\nnot Vapourised(manny)\n\nnot Javanese(manny) and not Javanese(manny) -> Vapourised(manny) -> therefore Vapourised(manny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Shalna is skillful. Dian is lxxxviii. Abagael is not lxxxviii. If Abagael is not lxxxviii then Abagael is precative. If something is nineteenth and not skillful then it is hooked. If something is hooked and lxxxviii then it is cogitable. If something is sensuous then it is cogitable. If Shalna is cogitable then Shalna is precative. Kind things are sensuous. Abagael is sensuous.", "logic": "\nSkillful(shalna)\nLxxxviii(dian)\nnot Lxxxviii(abagael)\nnot Lxxxviii(abagael) -> Precative(abagael)\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) and not Skillful(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Lxxxviii(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nforall x (Sensuous(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nCogitable(shalna) -> Precative(shalna)\nforall x (Precative(x) -> Sensuous(x))\n\nSensuous(abagael)\n\nnot Lxxxviii(abagael) and not Lxxxviii(abagael) -> Precative(abagael) -> therefore Precative(abagael) Precative(abagael) and forall x (Precative(x) -> Sensuous(x)) -> therefore Sensuous(abagael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Othella is flippant. Angele is reusable. Reid is not reusable. If Reid is not reusable then Reid is corrupting. If something is oppositive and not flippant then it is inconstant. If something is inconstant and reusable then it is aromatic. If something is geometric then it is aromatic. If Othella is aromatic then Othella is corrupting. Kind things are geometric. Reid is not geometric.", "logic": "\nFlippant(othella)\nReusable(angele)\nnot Reusable(reid)\nnot Reusable(reid) -> Corrupting(reid)\nforall x (Oppositive(x) and not Flippant(x) -> Inconstant(x))\nforall x (Inconstant(x) and Reusable(x) -> Aromatic(x))\nforall x (Geometric(x) -> Aromatic(x))\nAromatic(othella) -> Corrupting(othella)\nforall x (Corrupting(x) -> Geometric(x))\n\nnot Geometric(reid)\n\nnot Reusable(reid) and not Reusable(reid) -> Corrupting(reid) -> therefore Corrupting(reid) Corrupting(reid) and forall x (Corrupting(x) -> Geometric(x)) -> therefore Geometric(reid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Kenyon is ocular. Flint is naif. Tamra is not naif. If Tamra is not naif then Tamra is searing. If something is meridional and not ocular then it is igneous. If something is igneous and naif then it is elongate. If something is indebted then it is elongate. If Kenyon is elongate then Kenyon is searing. Kind things are indebted. Tamra is elongate.", "logic": "\nOcular(kenyon)\nNaif(flint)\nnot Naif(tamra)\nnot Naif(tamra) -> Searing(tamra)\nforall x (Meridional(x) and not Ocular(x) -> Igneous(x))\nforall x (Igneous(x) and Naif(x) -> Elongate(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) -> Elongate(x))\nElongate(kenyon) -> Searing(kenyon)\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Indebted(x))\n\nElongate(tamra)\n\nnot Naif(tamra) and not Naif(tamra) -> Searing(tamra) -> therefore Searing(tamra) Searing(tamra) and forall x (Searing(x) -> Indebted(x)) -> therefore Indebted(tamra) Indebted(tamra) and forall x (Indebted(x) -> Elongate(x)) -> therefore Elongate(tamra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Caroleen is chaffy. Philipa is exothermic. Charmion is not exothermic. If Charmion is not exothermic then Charmion is obligatory. If something is pivotal and not chaffy then it is shitless. If something is shitless and exothermic then it is centralist. If something is citywide then it is centralist. If Caroleen is centralist then Caroleen is obligatory. Kind things are citywide. Charmion is not centralist.", "logic": "\nChaffy(caroleen)\nExothermic(philipa)\nnot Exothermic(charmion)\nnot Exothermic(charmion) -> Obligatory(charmion)\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and not Chaffy(x) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) and Exothermic(x) -> Centralist(x))\nforall x (Citywide(x) -> Centralist(x))\nCentralist(caroleen) -> Obligatory(caroleen)\nforall x (Obligatory(x) -> Citywide(x))\n\nnot Centralist(charmion)\n\nnot Exothermic(charmion) and not Exothermic(charmion) -> Obligatory(charmion) -> therefore Obligatory(charmion) Obligatory(charmion) and forall x (Obligatory(x) -> Citywide(x)) -> therefore Citywide(charmion) Citywide(charmion) and forall x (Citywide(x) -> Centralist(x)) -> therefore Centralist(charmion)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Alf is prim. Gregor is balsamic. Cinda is not balsamic. If Cinda is not balsamic then Cinda is inaudible. If something is whiney and not prim then it is pimpled. If something is pimpled and balsamic then it is advance. If something is undeclared then it is advance. If Alf is advance then Alf is inaudible. Kind things are undeclared. Gregor is not undeclared.", "logic": "\nPrim(alf)\nBalsamic(gregor)\nnot Balsamic(cinda)\nnot Balsamic(cinda) -> Inaudible(cinda)\nforall x (Whiney(x) and not Prim(x) -> Pimpled(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) and Balsamic(x) -> Advance(x))\nforall x (Undeclared(x) -> Advance(x))\nAdvance(alf) -> Inaudible(alf)\nforall x (Inaudible(x) -> Undeclared(x))\n\nnot Undeclared(gregor)\n\nforall x (Inaudible(x) -> Undeclared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Barnard is bugged. Auberta is exploded. Diena is not exploded. If Diena is not exploded then Diena is soughing. If something is contented and not bugged then it is creedal. If something is creedal and exploded then it is motile. If something is bisontine then it is motile. If Barnard is motile then Barnard is soughing. Kind things are bisontine. Barnard is bisontine.", "logic": "\nBugged(barnard)\nExploded(auberta)\nnot Exploded(diena)\nnot Exploded(diena) -> Soughing(diena)\nforall x (Contented(x) and not Bugged(x) -> Creedal(x))\nforall x (Creedal(x) and Exploded(x) -> Motile(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Motile(x))\nMotile(barnard) -> Soughing(barnard)\nforall x (Soughing(x) -> Bisontine(x))\n\nBisontine(barnard)\n\nforall x (Soughing(x) -> Bisontine(x)) <- Motile(barnard) -> Soughing(barnard) <- forall x (Creedal(x) and Exploded(x) -> Motile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Marci is nitric. Paolina is hispid. Cathryn is not hispid. If Cathryn is not hispid then Cathryn is terete. If something is cogitative and not nitric then it is medullated. If something is medullated and hispid then it is working. If something is capitalist then it is working. If Marci is working then Marci is terete. Kind things are capitalist. Marci is not working.", "logic": "\nNitric(marci)\nHispid(paolina)\nnot Hispid(cathryn)\nnot Hispid(cathryn) -> Terete(cathryn)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) and not Nitric(x) -> Medullated(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) and Hispid(x) -> Working(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Working(x))\nWorking(marci) -> Terete(marci)\nforall x (Terete(x) -> Capitalist(x))\n\nnot Working(marci)\n\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Working(x)) <- forall x (Terete(x) -> Capitalist(x)) <- Working(marci) -> Terete(marci) <- forall x (Medullated(x) and Hispid(x) -> Working(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Illa is bellied. Tobi is hardy. Polly is not hardy. If Polly is not hardy then Polly is familiar. If something is appealable and not bellied then it is inelastic. If something is inelastic and hardy then it is trophic. If something is hassidic then it is trophic. If Illa is trophic then Illa is familiar. Kind things are hassidic. Tobi is inelastic.", "logic": "\nBellied(illa)\nHardy(tobi)\nnot Hardy(polly)\nnot Hardy(polly) -> Familiar(polly)\nforall x (Appealable(x) and not Bellied(x) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Hardy(x) -> Trophic(x))\nforall x (Hassidic(x) -> Trophic(x))\nTrophic(illa) -> Familiar(illa)\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Hassidic(x))\n\nInelastic(tobi)\n\nforall x (Appealable(x) and not Bellied(x) -> Inelastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Gabriel is absorbent. Durant is zero. Ike is not zero. If Ike is not zero then Ike is billionth. If something is hungarian and not absorbent then it is jordanian. If something is jordanian and zero then it is excusable. If something is ajar then it is excusable. If Gabriel is excusable then Gabriel is billionth. Kind things are ajar. Durant is not hungarian.", "logic": "\nAbsorbent(gabriel)\nZero(durant)\nnot Zero(ike)\nnot Zero(ike) -> Billionth(ike)\nforall x (Hungarian(x) and not Absorbent(x) -> Jordanian(x))\nforall x (Jordanian(x) and Zero(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Ajar(x) -> Excusable(x))\nExcusable(gabriel) -> Billionth(gabriel)\nforall x (Billionth(x) -> Ajar(x))\n\nnot Hungarian(durant)\n\nnot Hungarian(durant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Shelagh is documented. Brunhilda is lowbrow. Alia is not lowbrow. If Alia is not lowbrow then Alia is maternal. If something is reductive and not documented then it is unpurified. If something is unpurified and lowbrow then it is apterous. If something is plumbic then it is apterous. If Shelagh is apterous then Shelagh is maternal. Kind things are plumbic. Alia is reductive.", "logic": "\nDocumented(shelagh)\nLowbrow(brunhilda)\nnot Lowbrow(alia)\nnot Lowbrow(alia) -> Maternal(alia)\nforall x (Reductive(x) and not Documented(x) -> Unpurified(x))\nforall x (Unpurified(x) and Lowbrow(x) -> Apterous(x))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) -> Apterous(x))\nApterous(shelagh) -> Maternal(shelagh)\nforall x (Maternal(x) -> Plumbic(x))\n\nReductive(alia)\n\nReductive(alia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Heida is sclerotic. Grant is analyzed. Patrice is not analyzed. If Patrice is not analyzed then Patrice is circinate. If something is stormbound and not sclerotic then it is scalene. If something is scalene and analyzed then it is lxvi. If something is creole then it is lxvi. If Heida is lxvi then Heida is circinate. Kind things are creole. Patrice is not sclerotic.", "logic": "\nSclerotic(heida)\nAnalyzed(grant)\nnot Analyzed(patrice)\nnot Analyzed(patrice) -> Circinate(patrice)\nforall x (Stormbound(x) and not Sclerotic(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) and Analyzed(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Creole(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nLxvi(heida) -> Circinate(heida)\nforall x (Circinate(x) -> Creole(x))\n\nnot Sclerotic(patrice)\n\nnot Sclerotic(patrice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Meredeth is obsessed. Holly is xxii. Tamiko is not xxii. If Tamiko is not xxii then Tamiko is incapable. If something is dyslectic and not obsessed then it is pavlovian. If something is pavlovian and xxii then it is fraternal. If something is fanged then it is fraternal. If Meredeth is fraternal then Meredeth is incapable. Kind things are fanged. Holly is obsessed.", "logic": "\nObsessed(meredeth)\nXxii(holly)\nnot Xxii(tamiko)\nnot Xxii(tamiko) -> Incapable(tamiko)\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) and not Obsessed(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) and Xxii(x) -> Fraternal(x))\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Fraternal(x))\nFraternal(meredeth) -> Incapable(meredeth)\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Fanged(x))\n\nObsessed(holly)\n\nObsessed(holly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "The rasla concenter the dotty. The dotty bush the rasla. The dotty decontrol the rasla. If someone concenter the rasla then they do not like the rasla. If someone is dispirited then they like the rasla. If someone concenter the dotty and they like the dotty then they do not need the dotty. If someone concenter the dotty then they are dispirited. If someone decontrol the rasla and they are not unrouged then they are unclaimed. If someone decontrol the rasla then the rasla concenter the dotty. If someone is dispirited then they like the dotty. If someone is dispirited and indusial then they see the dotty. The dotty bush the rasla.", "logic": "\nConcenter(rasla, dotty)\nBush(dotty, rasla)\nDecontrol(dotty, rasla)\nforall x (Concenter(x, rasla) -> not Bush(x, rasla))\nforall x (Dispirited(x) -> Bush(x, rasla))\nforall x (Concenter(x, dotty) and Bush(x, dotty) -> not Decontrol(x, dotty))\nforall x (Concenter(x, dotty) -> Dispirited(x))\nforall x (Decontrol(x, rasla) and not Unrouged(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Decontrol(x, rasla) -> Concenter(rasla, dotty))\nforall x (Dispirited(x) -> Bush(x, dotty))\nforall x (Dispirited(x) and Indusial(x) -> Concenter(x, dotty))\n\nBush(dotty, rasla)\n\ntherefore Bush(dotty, rasla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The guendolen insert the margery. The margery melodize the guendolen. The margery deaf the guendolen. If someone insert the guendolen then they do not like the guendolen. If someone is tuberous then they like the guendolen. If someone insert the margery and they like the margery then they do not need the margery. If someone insert the margery then they are tuberous. If someone deaf the guendolen and they are not vaporific then they are alacritous. If someone deaf the guendolen then the guendolen insert the margery. If someone is tuberous then they like the margery. If someone is tuberous and deserved then they see the margery. The margery does not need the guendolen.", "logic": "\nInsert(guendolen, margery)\nMelodize(margery, guendolen)\nDeaf(margery, guendolen)\nforall x (Insert(x, guendolen) -> not Melodize(x, guendolen))\nforall x (Tuberous(x) -> Melodize(x, guendolen))\nforall x (Insert(x, margery) and Melodize(x, margery) -> not Deaf(x, margery))\nforall x (Insert(x, margery) -> Tuberous(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x, guendolen) and not Vaporific(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x, guendolen) -> Insert(guendolen, margery))\nforall x (Tuberous(x) -> Melodize(x, margery))\nforall x (Tuberous(x) and Deserved(x) -> Insert(x, margery))\n\nnot Deaf(margery, guendolen)\n\ntherefore Deaf(margery, guendolen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The lilli leave the rhodia. The rhodia lash the lilli. The rhodia cloister the lilli. If someone leave the lilli then they do not like the lilli. If someone is seared then they like the lilli. If someone leave the rhodia and they like the rhodia then they do not need the rhodia. If someone leave the rhodia then they are seared. If someone cloister the lilli and they are not animistic then they are agreed. If someone cloister the lilli then the lilli leave the rhodia. If someone is seared then they like the rhodia. If someone is seared and scopal then they see the rhodia. The lilli is seared.", "logic": "\nLeave(lilli, rhodia)\nLash(rhodia, lilli)\nCloister(rhodia, lilli)\nforall x (Leave(x, lilli) -> not Lash(x, lilli))\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Lash(x, lilli))\nforall x (Leave(x, rhodia) and Lash(x, rhodia) -> not Cloister(x, rhodia))\nforall x (Leave(x, rhodia) -> Seared(x))\nforall x (Cloister(x, lilli) and not Animistic(x) -> Agreed(x))\nforall x (Cloister(x, lilli) -> Leave(lilli, rhodia))\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Lash(x, rhodia))\nforall x (Seared(x) and Scopal(x) -> Leave(x, rhodia))\n\nSeared(lilli)\n\nLeave(lilli, rhodia) and forall x (Leave(x, rhodia) -> Seared(x)) -> therefore Seared(lilli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The ari eroticize the gena. The gena bacterise the ari. The gena ricochet the ari. If someone eroticize the ari then they do not like the ari. If someone is frantic then they like the ari. If someone eroticize the gena and they like the gena then they do not need the gena. If someone eroticize the gena then they are frantic. If someone ricochet the ari and they are not elaborated then they are vesicatory. If someone ricochet the ari then the ari eroticize the gena. If someone is frantic then they like the gena. If someone is frantic and clouded then they see the gena. The ari is not frantic.", "logic": "\nEroticize(ari, gena)\nBacterise(gena, ari)\nRicochet(gena, ari)\nforall x (Eroticize(x, ari) -> not Bacterise(x, ari))\nforall x (Frantic(x) -> Bacterise(x, ari))\nforall x (Eroticize(x, gena) and Bacterise(x, gena) -> not Ricochet(x, gena))\nforall x (Eroticize(x, gena) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, ari) and not Elaborated(x) -> Vesicatory(x))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, ari) -> Eroticize(ari, gena))\nforall x (Frantic(x) -> Bacterise(x, gena))\nforall x (Frantic(x) and Clouded(x) -> Eroticize(x, gena))\n\nnot Frantic(ari)\n\nEroticize(ari, gena) and forall x (Eroticize(x, gena) -> Frantic(x)) -> therefore Frantic(ari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The birdie manumit the mireielle. The mireielle separate the birdie. The mireielle pare the birdie. If someone manumit the birdie then they do not like the birdie. If someone is unbowed then they like the birdie. If someone manumit the mireielle and they like the mireielle then they do not need the mireielle. If someone manumit the mireielle then they are unbowed. If someone pare the birdie and they are not unexcused then they are moraceous. If someone pare the birdie then the birdie manumit the mireielle. If someone is unbowed then they like the mireielle. If someone is unbowed and absent then they see the mireielle. The birdie separate the birdie.", "logic": "\nManumit(birdie, mireielle)\nSeparate(mireielle, birdie)\nPare(mireielle, birdie)\nforall x (Manumit(x, birdie) -> not Separate(x, birdie))\nforall x (Unbowed(x) -> Separate(x, birdie))\nforall x (Manumit(x, mireielle) and Separate(x, mireielle) -> not Pare(x, mireielle))\nforall x (Manumit(x, mireielle) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Pare(x, birdie) and not Unexcused(x) -> Moraceous(x))\nforall x (Pare(x, birdie) -> Manumit(birdie, mireielle))\nforall x (Unbowed(x) -> Separate(x, mireielle))\nforall x (Unbowed(x) and Absent(x) -> Manumit(x, mireielle))\n\nSeparate(birdie, birdie)\n\nManumit(birdie, mireielle) and forall x (Manumit(x, mireielle) -> Unbowed(x)) -> therefore Unbowed(birdie) Unbowed(birdie) and forall x (Unbowed(x) -> Separate(x, birdie)) -> therefore Separate(birdie, birdie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The brenn syllogise the korella. The korella rearrange the brenn. The korella maunder the brenn. If someone syllogise the brenn then they do not like the brenn. If someone is ramshackle then they like the brenn. If someone syllogise the korella and they like the korella then they do not need the korella. If someone syllogise the korella then they are ramshackle. If someone maunder the brenn and they are not connubial then they are voracious. If someone maunder the brenn then the brenn syllogise the korella. If someone is ramshackle then they like the korella. If someone is ramshackle and pitted then they see the korella. The brenn does not like the korella.", "logic": "\nSyllogise(brenn, korella)\nRearrange(korella, brenn)\nMaunder(korella, brenn)\nforall x (Syllogise(x, brenn) -> not Rearrange(x, brenn))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) -> Rearrange(x, brenn))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, korella) and Rearrange(x, korella) -> not Maunder(x, korella))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, korella) -> Ramshackle(x))\nforall x (Maunder(x, brenn) and not Connubial(x) -> Voracious(x))\nforall x (Maunder(x, brenn) -> Syllogise(brenn, korella))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) -> Rearrange(x, korella))\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) and Pitted(x) -> Syllogise(x, korella))\n\nnot Rearrange(brenn, korella)\n\nSyllogise(brenn, korella) and forall x (Syllogise(x, korella) -> Ramshackle(x)) -> therefore Ramshackle(brenn) Ramshackle(brenn) and forall x (Ramshackle(x) -> Rearrange(x, korella)) -> therefore Rearrange(brenn, korella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The ephrayim sleepwalk the ardine. The ardine abacinate the ephrayim. The ardine whine the ephrayim. If someone sleepwalk the ephrayim then they do not like the ephrayim. If someone is unforced then they like the ephrayim. If someone sleepwalk the ardine and they like the ardine then they do not need the ardine. If someone sleepwalk the ardine then they are unforced. If someone whine the ephrayim and they are not humanlike then they are squatty. If someone whine the ephrayim then the ephrayim sleepwalk the ardine. If someone is unforced then they like the ardine. If someone is unforced and hushed then they see the ardine. The ephrayim does not need the ardine.", "logic": "\nSleepwalk(ephrayim, ardine)\nAbacinate(ardine, ephrayim)\nWhine(ardine, ephrayim)\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, ephrayim) -> not Abacinate(x, ephrayim))\nforall x (Unforced(x) -> Abacinate(x, ephrayim))\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, ardine) and Abacinate(x, ardine) -> not Whine(x, ardine))\nforall x (Sleepwalk(x, ardine) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Whine(x, ephrayim) and not Humanlike(x) -> Squatty(x))\nforall x (Whine(x, ephrayim) -> Sleepwalk(ephrayim, ardine))\nforall x (Unforced(x) -> Abacinate(x, ardine))\nforall x (Unforced(x) and Hushed(x) -> Sleepwalk(x, ardine))\n\nnot Whine(ephrayim, ardine)\n\nSleepwalk(ephrayim, ardine) and forall x (Sleepwalk(x, ardine) -> Unforced(x)) -> therefore Unforced(ephrayim) Unforced(ephrayim) and forall x (Unforced(x) -> Abacinate(x, ardine)) -> therefore Abacinate(ephrayim, ardine) Sleepwalk(ephrayim, ardine) and Abacinate(ephrayim, ardine) and forall x (Sleepwalk(x, ardine) and Abacinate(x, ardine) -> not Whine(x, ardine)) -> therefore not Whine(ephrayim, ardine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The philipa deregulate the elwina. The elwina prank the philipa. The elwina congee the philipa. If someone deregulate the philipa then they do not like the philipa. If someone is passive then they like the philipa. If someone deregulate the elwina and they like the elwina then they do not need the elwina. If someone deregulate the elwina then they are passive. If someone congee the philipa and they are not prepupal then they are unstirred. If someone congee the philipa then the philipa deregulate the elwina. If someone is passive then they like the elwina. If someone is passive and glowing then they see the elwina. The philipa congee the elwina.", "logic": "\nDeregulate(philipa, elwina)\nPrank(elwina, philipa)\nCongee(elwina, philipa)\nforall x (Deregulate(x, philipa) -> not Prank(x, philipa))\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Prank(x, philipa))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, elwina) and Prank(x, elwina) -> not Congee(x, elwina))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, elwina) -> Passive(x))\nforall x (Congee(x, philipa) and not Prepupal(x) -> Unstirred(x))\nforall x (Congee(x, philipa) -> Deregulate(philipa, elwina))\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Prank(x, elwina))\nforall x (Passive(x) and Glowing(x) -> Deregulate(x, elwina))\n\nCongee(philipa, elwina)\n\nDeregulate(philipa, elwina) and forall x (Deregulate(x, elwina) -> Passive(x)) -> therefore Passive(philipa) Passive(philipa) and forall x (Passive(x) -> Prank(x, elwina)) -> therefore Prank(philipa, elwina) Deregulate(philipa, elwina) and Prank(philipa, elwina) and forall x (Deregulate(x, elwina) and Prank(x, elwina) -> not Congee(x, elwina)) -> therefore not Congee(philipa, elwina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The caresse vaticinate the leora. The leora suffix the caresse. The leora storm the caresse. If someone vaticinate the caresse then they do not like the caresse. If someone is paroxysmal then they like the caresse. If someone vaticinate the leora and they like the leora then they do not need the leora. If someone vaticinate the leora then they are paroxysmal. If someone storm the caresse and they are not fanged then they are formic. If someone storm the caresse then the caresse vaticinate the leora. If someone is paroxysmal then they like the leora. If someone is paroxysmal and ebon then they see the leora. The leora is not paroxysmal.", "logic": "\nVaticinate(caresse, leora)\nSuffix(leora, caresse)\nStorm(leora, caresse)\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, caresse) -> not Suffix(x, caresse))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) -> Suffix(x, caresse))\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, leora) and Suffix(x, leora) -> not Storm(x, leora))\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, leora) -> Paroxysmal(x))\nforall x (Storm(x, caresse) and not Fanged(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Storm(x, caresse) -> Vaticinate(caresse, leora))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) -> Suffix(x, leora))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) and Ebon(x) -> Vaticinate(x, leora))\n\nnot Paroxysmal(leora)\n\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, leora) -> Paroxysmal(x)) <- forall x (Paroxysmal(x) and Ebon(x) -> Vaticinate(x, leora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The samuella outstare the tharen. The tharen inhibit the samuella. The tharen cocker the samuella. If someone outstare the samuella then they do not like the samuella. If someone is cushioned then they like the samuella. If someone outstare the tharen and they like the tharen then they do not need the tharen. If someone outstare the tharen then they are cushioned. If someone cocker the samuella and they are not disdainful then they are chanted. If someone cocker the samuella then the samuella outstare the tharen. If someone is cushioned then they like the tharen. If someone is cushioned and crowned then they see the tharen. The tharen inhibit the tharen.", "logic": "\nOutstare(samuella, tharen)\nInhibit(tharen, samuella)\nCocker(tharen, samuella)\nforall x (Outstare(x, samuella) -> not Inhibit(x, samuella))\nforall x (Cushioned(x) -> Inhibit(x, samuella))\nforall x (Outstare(x, tharen) and Inhibit(x, tharen) -> not Cocker(x, tharen))\nforall x (Outstare(x, tharen) -> Cushioned(x))\nforall x (Cocker(x, samuella) and not Disdainful(x) -> Chanted(x))\nforall x (Cocker(x, samuella) -> Outstare(samuella, tharen))\nforall x (Cushioned(x) -> Inhibit(x, tharen))\nforall x (Cushioned(x) and Crowned(x) -> Outstare(x, tharen))\n\nInhibit(tharen, tharen)\n\nforall x (Cushioned(x) -> Inhibit(x, tharen)) <- forall x (Outstare(x, tharen) -> Cushioned(x)) <- forall x (Cushioned(x) and Crowned(x) -> Outstare(x, tharen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The tarrant damp the caro. The caro castigate the tarrant. The caro foam the tarrant. If someone damp the tarrant then they do not like the tarrant. If someone is federal then they like the tarrant. If someone damp the caro and they like the caro then they do not need the caro. If someone damp the caro then they are federal. If someone foam the tarrant and they are not looking then they are conjugated. If someone foam the tarrant then the tarrant damp the caro. If someone is federal then they like the caro. If someone is federal and some then they see the caro. The tarrant is not conjugated.", "logic": "\nDamp(tarrant, caro)\nCastigate(caro, tarrant)\nFoam(caro, tarrant)\nforall x (Damp(x, tarrant) -> not Castigate(x, tarrant))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> Castigate(x, tarrant))\nforall x (Damp(x, caro) and Castigate(x, caro) -> not Foam(x, caro))\nforall x (Damp(x, caro) -> Federal(x))\nforall x (Foam(x, tarrant) and not Looking(x) -> Conjugated(x))\nforall x (Foam(x, tarrant) -> Damp(tarrant, caro))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> Castigate(x, caro))\nforall x (Federal(x) and Some(x) -> Damp(x, caro))\n\nnot Conjugated(tarrant)\n\nforall x (Foam(x, tarrant) and not Looking(x) -> Conjugated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The kellyann eruct the maurise. The maurise squelch the kellyann. The maurise idle the kellyann. If someone eruct the kellyann then they do not like the kellyann. If someone is readable then they like the kellyann. If someone eruct the maurise and they like the maurise then they do not need the maurise. If someone eruct the maurise then they are readable. If someone idle the kellyann and they are not gabled then they are frangible. If someone idle the kellyann then the kellyann eruct the maurise. If someone is readable then they like the maurise. If someone is readable and harassed then they see the maurise. The maurise is frangible.", "logic": "\nEruct(kellyann, maurise)\nSquelch(maurise, kellyann)\nIdle(maurise, kellyann)\nforall x (Eruct(x, kellyann) -> not Squelch(x, kellyann))\nforall x (Readable(x) -> Squelch(x, kellyann))\nforall x (Eruct(x, maurise) and Squelch(x, maurise) -> not Idle(x, maurise))\nforall x (Eruct(x, maurise) -> Readable(x))\nforall x (Idle(x, kellyann) and not Gabled(x) -> Frangible(x))\nforall x (Idle(x, kellyann) -> Eruct(kellyann, maurise))\nforall x (Readable(x) -> Squelch(x, maurise))\nforall x (Readable(x) and Harassed(x) -> Eruct(x, maurise))\n\nFrangible(maurise)\n\nforall x (Idle(x, kellyann) and not Gabled(x) -> Frangible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The flossy commute the catherin. The catherin hide the flossy. The catherin confection the flossy. If someone commute the flossy then they do not like the flossy. If someone is blockish then they like the flossy. If someone commute the catherin and they like the catherin then they do not need the catherin. If someone commute the catherin then they are blockish. If someone confection the flossy and they are not bodacious then they are shattered. If someone confection the flossy then the flossy commute the catherin. If someone is blockish then they like the catherin. If someone is blockish and figural then they see the catherin. The catherin is not kind.", "logic": "\nCommute(flossy, catherin)\nHide(catherin, flossy)\nConfection(catherin, flossy)\nforall x (Commute(x, flossy) -> not Hide(x, flossy))\nforall x (Blockish(x) -> Hide(x, flossy))\nforall x (Commute(x, catherin) and Hide(x, catherin) -> not Confection(x, catherin))\nforall x (Commute(x, catherin) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Confection(x, flossy) and not Bodacious(x) -> Shattered(x))\nforall x (Confection(x, flossy) -> Commute(flossy, catherin))\nforall x (Blockish(x) -> Hide(x, catherin))\nforall x (Blockish(x) and Figural(x) -> Commute(x, catherin))\n\nnot Kind(catherin)\n\nnot Kind(catherin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The lissy well the lory. The lory strive the lissy. The lory enmesh the lissy. If someone well the lissy then they do not like the lissy. If someone is cryptic then they like the lissy. If someone well the lory and they like the lory then they do not need the lory. If someone well the lory then they are cryptic. If someone enmesh the lissy and they are not restful then they are wearable. If someone enmesh the lissy then the lissy well the lory. If someone is cryptic then they like the lory. If someone is cryptic and nonverbal then they see the lory. The lissy enmesh the lissy.", "logic": "\nWell(lissy, lory)\nStrive(lory, lissy)\nEnmesh(lory, lissy)\nforall x (Well(x, lissy) -> not Strive(x, lissy))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) -> Strive(x, lissy))\nforall x (Well(x, lory) and Strive(x, lory) -> not Enmesh(x, lory))\nforall x (Well(x, lory) -> Cryptic(x))\nforall x (Enmesh(x, lissy) and not Restful(x) -> Wearable(x))\nforall x (Enmesh(x, lissy) -> Well(lissy, lory))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) -> Strive(x, lory))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and Nonverbal(x) -> Well(x, lory))\n\nEnmesh(lissy, lissy)\n\nEnmesh(lissy, lissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The dori ingraft the delinda. The delinda band the dori. The delinda push the dori. If someone ingraft the dori then they do not like the dori. If someone is razorback then they like the dori. If someone ingraft the delinda and they like the delinda then they do not need the delinda. If someone ingraft the delinda then they are razorback. If someone push the dori and they are not incendiary then they are sagittate. If someone push the dori then the dori ingraft the delinda. If someone is razorback then they like the delinda. If someone is razorback and vertebral then they see the delinda. The delinda does not need the delinda.", "logic": "\nIngraft(dori, delinda)\nBand(delinda, dori)\nPush(delinda, dori)\nforall x (Ingraft(x, dori) -> not Band(x, dori))\nforall x (Razorback(x) -> Band(x, dori))\nforall x (Ingraft(x, delinda) and Band(x, delinda) -> not Push(x, delinda))\nforall x (Ingraft(x, delinda) -> Razorback(x))\nforall x (Push(x, dori) and not Incendiary(x) -> Sagittate(x))\nforall x (Push(x, dori) -> Ingraft(dori, delinda))\nforall x (Razorback(x) -> Band(x, delinda))\nforall x (Razorback(x) and Vertebral(x) -> Ingraft(x, delinda))\n\nnot Push(delinda, delinda)\n\nnot Push(delinda, delinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The simon unhorse the yolane. The yolane catechize the simon. The yolane sentence the simon. If someone unhorse the simon then they do not like the simon. If someone is flatulent then they like the simon. If someone unhorse the yolane and they like the yolane then they do not need the yolane. If someone unhorse the yolane then they are flatulent. If someone sentence the simon and they are not unwebbed then they are unruly. If someone sentence the simon then the simon unhorse the yolane. If someone is flatulent then they like the yolane. If someone is flatulent and tubed then they see the yolane. The simon is kind.", "logic": "\nUnhorse(simon, yolane)\nCatechize(yolane, simon)\nSentence(yolane, simon)\nforall x (Unhorse(x, simon) -> not Catechize(x, simon))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) -> Catechize(x, simon))\nforall x (Unhorse(x, yolane) and Catechize(x, yolane) -> not Sentence(x, yolane))\nforall x (Unhorse(x, yolane) -> Flatulent(x))\nforall x (Sentence(x, simon) and not Unwebbed(x) -> Unruly(x))\nforall x (Sentence(x, simon) -> Unhorse(simon, yolane))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) -> Catechize(x, yolane))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) and Tubed(x) -> Unhorse(x, yolane))\n\nKind(simon)\n\nKind(simon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The kristal is doubled. The kristal is aguish. The kristal warm the jeb. The kristal bollix the annice. The ruby widen the kristal. The ruby widen the annice. The ruby is doubled. The ruby is permeating. The jeb does not eat the annice. The jeb is doubled. The jeb is permeating. The jeb is not aguish. The jeb does not visit the ruby. The annice widen the jeb. The annice is doubled. The annice does not like the ruby. If something bollix the ruby and the ruby does not visit the annice then it widen the ruby. If something widen the jeb then it widen the ruby. If something widen the kristal then it is aguish. If the ruby bollix the jeb then the jeb warm the kristal. If something warm the jeb and it does not visit the kristal then the kristal widen the ruby. If something widen the kristal and it is aguish then it widen the jeb. If the ruby is doubled then the ruby is uncapped. If something widen the kristal then the kristal widen the annice. The jeb is permeating.", "logic": "\nDoubled(kristal)\nAguish(kristal)\nWarm(kristal, jeb)\nBollix(kristal, annice)\nWiden(ruby, kristal)\nWiden(ruby, annice)\nDoubled(ruby)\nPermeating(ruby)\nnot Widen(jeb, annice)\nDoubled(jeb)\nPermeating(jeb)\nnot Aguish(jeb)\nnot Bollix(jeb, ruby)\nWiden(annice, jeb)\nDoubled(annice)\nnot Warm(annice, ruby)\nforall x (Bollix(x, ruby) and not Bollix(ruby, annice) -> Widen(x, ruby))\nforall x (Widen(x, jeb) -> Widen(x, ruby))\nforall x (Widen(x, kristal) -> Aguish(x))\nBollix(ruby, jeb) -> Warm(jeb, kristal)\nforall x (Warm(x, jeb) and not Bollix(x, kristal) -> Widen(kristal, ruby))\nforall x (Widen(x, kristal) and Aguish(x) -> Widen(x, jeb))\nDoubled(ruby) -> Uncapped(ruby)\nforall x (Widen(x, kristal) -> Widen(kristal, annice))\n\nPermeating(jeb)\n\ntherefore Permeating(jeb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The morna is burbly. The morna is hawkish. The morna magnetise the batsheva. The morna coif the jilli. The joanie urge the morna. The joanie urge the jilli. The joanie is burbly. The joanie is outrigged. The batsheva does not eat the jilli. The batsheva is burbly. The batsheva is outrigged. The batsheva is not hawkish. The batsheva does not visit the joanie. The jilli urge the batsheva. The jilli is burbly. The jilli does not like the joanie. If something coif the joanie and the joanie does not visit the jilli then it urge the joanie. If something urge the batsheva then it urge the joanie. If something urge the morna then it is hawkish. If the joanie coif the batsheva then the batsheva magnetise the morna. If something magnetise the batsheva and it does not visit the morna then the morna urge the joanie. If something urge the morna and it is hawkish then it urge the batsheva. If the joanie is burbly then the joanie is maltese. If something urge the morna then the morna urge the jilli. The jilli does not eat the batsheva.", "logic": "\nBurbly(morna)\nHawkish(morna)\nMagnetise(morna, batsheva)\nCoif(morna, jilli)\nUrge(joanie, morna)\nUrge(joanie, jilli)\nBurbly(joanie)\nOutrigged(joanie)\nnot Urge(batsheva, jilli)\nBurbly(batsheva)\nOutrigged(batsheva)\nnot Hawkish(batsheva)\nnot Coif(batsheva, joanie)\nUrge(jilli, batsheva)\nBurbly(jilli)\nnot Magnetise(jilli, joanie)\nforall x (Coif(x, joanie) and not Coif(joanie, jilli) -> Urge(x, joanie))\nforall x (Urge(x, batsheva) -> Urge(x, joanie))\nforall x (Urge(x, morna) -> Hawkish(x))\nCoif(joanie, batsheva) -> Magnetise(batsheva, morna)\nforall x (Magnetise(x, batsheva) and not Coif(x, morna) -> Urge(morna, joanie))\nforall x (Urge(x, morna) and Hawkish(x) -> Urge(x, batsheva))\nBurbly(joanie) -> Maltese(joanie)\nforall x (Urge(x, morna) -> Urge(morna, jilli))\n\nnot Urge(jilli, batsheva)\n\ntherefore Urge(jilli, batsheva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The ramsay is sleeveless. The ramsay is fascinated. The ramsay banter the cecilia. The ramsay whittle the carree. The sig discipline the ramsay. The sig discipline the carree. The sig is sleeveless. The sig is vigesimal. The cecilia does not eat the carree. The cecilia is sleeveless. The cecilia is vigesimal. The cecilia is not fascinated. The cecilia does not visit the sig. The carree discipline the cecilia. The carree is sleeveless. The carree does not like the sig. If something whittle the sig and the sig does not visit the carree then it discipline the sig. If something discipline the cecilia then it discipline the sig. If something discipline the ramsay then it is fascinated. If the sig whittle the cecilia then the cecilia banter the ramsay. If something banter the cecilia and it does not visit the ramsay then the ramsay discipline the sig. If something discipline the ramsay and it is fascinated then it discipline the cecilia. If the sig is sleeveless then the sig is dolorous. If something discipline the ramsay then the ramsay discipline the carree. The sig is dolorous.", "logic": "\nSleeveless(ramsay)\nFascinated(ramsay)\nBanter(ramsay, cecilia)\nWhittle(ramsay, carree)\nDiscipline(sig, ramsay)\nDiscipline(sig, carree)\nSleeveless(sig)\nVigesimal(sig)\nnot Discipline(cecilia, carree)\nSleeveless(cecilia)\nVigesimal(cecilia)\nnot Fascinated(cecilia)\nnot Whittle(cecilia, sig)\nDiscipline(carree, cecilia)\nSleeveless(carree)\nnot Banter(carree, sig)\nforall x (Whittle(x, sig) and not Whittle(sig, carree) -> Discipline(x, sig))\nforall x (Discipline(x, cecilia) -> Discipline(x, sig))\nforall x (Discipline(x, ramsay) -> Fascinated(x))\nWhittle(sig, cecilia) -> Banter(cecilia, ramsay)\nforall x (Banter(x, cecilia) and not Whittle(x, ramsay) -> Discipline(ramsay, sig))\nforall x (Discipline(x, ramsay) and Fascinated(x) -> Discipline(x, cecilia))\nSleeveless(sig) -> Dolorous(sig)\nforall x (Discipline(x, ramsay) -> Discipline(ramsay, carree))\n\nDolorous(sig)\n\nSleeveless(sig) and Sleeveless(sig) -> Dolorous(sig) -> therefore Dolorous(sig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The erick is ictic. The erick is embryonic. The erick disallow the nicole. The erick climb the claudia. The stepha barrel the erick. The stepha barrel the claudia. The stepha is ictic. The stepha is bifid. The nicole does not eat the claudia. The nicole is ictic. The nicole is bifid. The nicole is not embryonic. The nicole does not visit the stepha. The claudia barrel the nicole. The claudia is ictic. The claudia does not like the stepha. If something climb the stepha and the stepha does not visit the claudia then it barrel the stepha. If something barrel the nicole then it barrel the stepha. If something barrel the erick then it is embryonic. If the stepha climb the nicole then the nicole disallow the erick. If something disallow the nicole and it does not visit the erick then the erick barrel the stepha. If something barrel the erick and it is embryonic then it barrel the nicole. If the stepha is ictic then the stepha is overeager. If something barrel the erick then the erick barrel the claudia. The erick does not eat the claudia.", "logic": "\nIctic(erick)\nEmbryonic(erick)\nDisallow(erick, nicole)\nClimb(erick, claudia)\nBarrel(stepha, erick)\nBarrel(stepha, claudia)\nIctic(stepha)\nBifid(stepha)\nnot Barrel(nicole, claudia)\nIctic(nicole)\nBifid(nicole)\nnot Embryonic(nicole)\nnot Climb(nicole, stepha)\nBarrel(claudia, nicole)\nIctic(claudia)\nnot Disallow(claudia, stepha)\nforall x (Climb(x, stepha) and not Climb(stepha, claudia) -> Barrel(x, stepha))\nforall x (Barrel(x, nicole) -> Barrel(x, stepha))\nforall x (Barrel(x, erick) -> Embryonic(x))\nClimb(stepha, nicole) -> Disallow(nicole, erick)\nforall x (Disallow(x, nicole) and not Climb(x, erick) -> Barrel(erick, stepha))\nforall x (Barrel(x, erick) and Embryonic(x) -> Barrel(x, nicole))\nIctic(stepha) -> Overeager(stepha)\nforall x (Barrel(x, erick) -> Barrel(erick, claudia))\n\nnot Barrel(erick, claudia)\n\nBarrel(stepha, erick) and forall x (Barrel(x, erick) -> Barrel(erick, claudia)) -> therefore Barrel(erick, claudia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The joachim is cursed. The joachim is aerated. The joachim rubricate the windham. The joachim joint the zelma. The sidney companion the joachim. The sidney companion the zelma. The sidney is cursed. The sidney is dehydrated. The windham does not eat the zelma. The windham is cursed. The windham is dehydrated. The windham is not aerated. The windham does not visit the sidney. The zelma companion the windham. The zelma is cursed. The zelma does not like the sidney. If something joint the sidney and the sidney does not visit the zelma then it companion the sidney. If something companion the windham then it companion the sidney. If something companion the joachim then it is aerated. If the sidney joint the windham then the windham rubricate the joachim. If something rubricate the windham and it does not visit the joachim then the joachim companion the sidney. If something companion the joachim and it is aerated then it companion the windham. If the sidney is cursed then the sidney is dermic. If something companion the joachim then the joachim companion the zelma. The sidney companion the windham.", "logic": "\nCursed(joachim)\nAerated(joachim)\nRubricate(joachim, windham)\nJoint(joachim, zelma)\nCompanion(sidney, joachim)\nCompanion(sidney, zelma)\nCursed(sidney)\nDehydrated(sidney)\nnot Companion(windham, zelma)\nCursed(windham)\nDehydrated(windham)\nnot Aerated(windham)\nnot Joint(windham, sidney)\nCompanion(zelma, windham)\nCursed(zelma)\nnot Rubricate(zelma, sidney)\nforall x (Joint(x, sidney) and not Joint(sidney, zelma) -> Companion(x, sidney))\nforall x (Companion(x, windham) -> Companion(x, sidney))\nforall x (Companion(x, joachim) -> Aerated(x))\nJoint(sidney, windham) -> Rubricate(windham, joachim)\nforall x (Rubricate(x, windham) and not Joint(x, joachim) -> Companion(joachim, sidney))\nforall x (Companion(x, joachim) and Aerated(x) -> Companion(x, windham))\nCursed(sidney) -> Dermic(sidney)\nforall x (Companion(x, joachim) -> Companion(joachim, zelma))\n\nCompanion(sidney, windham)\n\nCompanion(sidney, joachim) and forall x (Companion(x, joachim) -> Aerated(x)) -> therefore Aerated(sidney) Companion(sidney, joachim) and Aerated(sidney) and forall x (Companion(x, joachim) and Aerated(x) -> Companion(x, windham)) -> therefore Companion(sidney, windham)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The gladys is unknowing. The gladys is favorable. The gladys touch the abbey. The gladys discredit the uriah. The sol escalade the gladys. The sol escalade the uriah. The sol is unknowing. The sol is centenary. The abbey does not eat the uriah. The abbey is unknowing. The abbey is centenary. The abbey is not favorable. The abbey does not visit the sol. The uriah escalade the abbey. The uriah is unknowing. The uriah does not like the sol. If something discredit the sol and the sol does not visit the uriah then it escalade the sol. If something escalade the abbey then it escalade the sol. If something escalade the gladys then it is favorable. If the sol discredit the abbey then the abbey touch the gladys. If something touch the abbey and it does not visit the gladys then the gladys escalade the sol. If something escalade the gladys and it is favorable then it escalade the abbey. If the sol is unknowing then the sol is cheerless. If something escalade the gladys then the gladys escalade the uriah. The sol does not eat the abbey.", "logic": "\nUnknowing(gladys)\nFavorable(gladys)\nTouch(gladys, abbey)\nDiscredit(gladys, uriah)\nEscalade(sol, gladys)\nEscalade(sol, uriah)\nUnknowing(sol)\nCentenary(sol)\nnot Escalade(abbey, uriah)\nUnknowing(abbey)\nCentenary(abbey)\nnot Favorable(abbey)\nnot Discredit(abbey, sol)\nEscalade(uriah, abbey)\nUnknowing(uriah)\nnot Touch(uriah, sol)\nforall x (Discredit(x, sol) and not Discredit(sol, uriah) -> Escalade(x, sol))\nforall x (Escalade(x, abbey) -> Escalade(x, sol))\nforall x (Escalade(x, gladys) -> Favorable(x))\nDiscredit(sol, abbey) -> Touch(abbey, gladys)\nforall x (Touch(x, abbey) and not Discredit(x, gladys) -> Escalade(gladys, sol))\nforall x (Escalade(x, gladys) and Favorable(x) -> Escalade(x, abbey))\nUnknowing(sol) -> Cheerless(sol)\nforall x (Escalade(x, gladys) -> Escalade(gladys, uriah))\n\nnot Escalade(sol, abbey)\n\nEscalade(sol, gladys) and forall x (Escalade(x, gladys) -> Favorable(x)) -> therefore Favorable(sol) Escalade(sol, gladys) and Favorable(sol) and forall x (Escalade(x, gladys) and Favorable(x) -> Escalade(x, abbey)) -> therefore Escalade(sol, abbey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The queenie is precursory. The queenie is riming. The queenie affect the kristine. The queenie beacon the cyrus. The woodman subsidize the queenie. The woodman subsidize the cyrus. The woodman is precursory. The woodman is unlifelike. The kristine does not eat the cyrus. The kristine is precursory. The kristine is unlifelike. The kristine is not riming. The kristine does not visit the woodman. The cyrus subsidize the kristine. The cyrus is precursory. The cyrus does not like the woodman. If something beacon the woodman and the woodman does not visit the cyrus then it subsidize the woodman. If something subsidize the kristine then it subsidize the woodman. If something subsidize the queenie then it is riming. If the woodman beacon the kristine then the kristine affect the queenie. If something affect the kristine and it does not visit the queenie then the queenie subsidize the woodman. If something subsidize the queenie and it is riming then it subsidize the kristine. If the woodman is precursory then the woodman is fogbound. If something subsidize the queenie then the queenie subsidize the cyrus. The woodman subsidize the woodman.", "logic": "\nPrecursory(queenie)\nRiming(queenie)\nAffect(queenie, kristine)\nBeacon(queenie, cyrus)\nSubsidize(woodman, queenie)\nSubsidize(woodman, cyrus)\nPrecursory(woodman)\nUnlifelike(woodman)\nnot Subsidize(kristine, cyrus)\nPrecursory(kristine)\nUnlifelike(kristine)\nnot Riming(kristine)\nnot Beacon(kristine, woodman)\nSubsidize(cyrus, kristine)\nPrecursory(cyrus)\nnot Affect(cyrus, woodman)\nforall x (Beacon(x, woodman) and not Beacon(woodman, cyrus) -> Subsidize(x, woodman))\nforall x (Subsidize(x, kristine) -> Subsidize(x, woodman))\nforall x (Subsidize(x, queenie) -> Riming(x))\nBeacon(woodman, kristine) -> Affect(kristine, queenie)\nforall x (Affect(x, kristine) and not Beacon(x, queenie) -> Subsidize(queenie, woodman))\nforall x (Subsidize(x, queenie) and Riming(x) -> Subsidize(x, kristine))\nPrecursory(woodman) -> Fogbound(woodman)\nforall x (Subsidize(x, queenie) -> Subsidize(queenie, cyrus))\n\nSubsidize(woodman, woodman)\n\nSubsidize(woodman, queenie) and forall x (Subsidize(x, queenie) -> Riming(x)) -> therefore Riming(woodman) Subsidize(woodman, queenie) and Riming(woodman) and forall x (Subsidize(x, queenie) and Riming(x) -> Subsidize(x, kristine)) -> therefore Subsidize(woodman, kristine) Subsidize(woodman, kristine) and forall x (Subsidize(x, kristine) -> Subsidize(x, woodman)) -> therefore Subsidize(woodman, woodman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The fulton is breasted. The fulton is choleric. The fulton slaughter the eartha. The fulton apologise the catherine. The shena rattle the fulton. The shena rattle the catherine. The shena is breasted. The shena is glial. The eartha does not eat the catherine. The eartha is breasted. The eartha is glial. The eartha is not choleric. The eartha does not visit the shena. The catherine rattle the eartha. The catherine is breasted. The catherine does not like the shena. If something apologise the shena and the shena does not visit the catherine then it rattle the shena. If something rattle the eartha then it rattle the shena. If something rattle the fulton then it is choleric. If the shena apologise the eartha then the eartha slaughter the fulton. If something slaughter the eartha and it does not visit the fulton then the fulton rattle the shena. If something rattle the fulton and it is choleric then it rattle the eartha. If the shena is breasted then the shena is grainy. If something rattle the fulton then the fulton rattle the catherine. The shena does not eat the shena.", "logic": "\nBreasted(fulton)\nCholeric(fulton)\nSlaughter(fulton, eartha)\nApologise(fulton, catherine)\nRattle(shena, fulton)\nRattle(shena, catherine)\nBreasted(shena)\nGlial(shena)\nnot Rattle(eartha, catherine)\nBreasted(eartha)\nGlial(eartha)\nnot Choleric(eartha)\nnot Apologise(eartha, shena)\nRattle(catherine, eartha)\nBreasted(catherine)\nnot Slaughter(catherine, shena)\nforall x (Apologise(x, shena) and not Apologise(shena, catherine) -> Rattle(x, shena))\nforall x (Rattle(x, eartha) -> Rattle(x, shena))\nforall x (Rattle(x, fulton) -> Choleric(x))\nApologise(shena, eartha) -> Slaughter(eartha, fulton)\nforall x (Slaughter(x, eartha) and not Apologise(x, fulton) -> Rattle(fulton, shena))\nforall x (Rattle(x, fulton) and Choleric(x) -> Rattle(x, eartha))\nBreasted(shena) -> Grainy(shena)\nforall x (Rattle(x, fulton) -> Rattle(fulton, catherine))\n\nnot Rattle(shena, shena)\n\nRattle(shena, fulton) and forall x (Rattle(x, fulton) -> Choleric(x)) -> therefore Choleric(shena) Rattle(shena, fulton) and Choleric(shena) and forall x (Rattle(x, fulton) and Choleric(x) -> Rattle(x, eartha)) -> therefore Rattle(shena, eartha) Rattle(shena, eartha) and forall x (Rattle(x, eartha) -> Rattle(x, shena)) -> therefore Rattle(shena, shena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The jefferson is beholden. The jefferson is unalarming. The jefferson hatch the corabella. The jefferson pantomime the thad. The karalynn clock the jefferson. The karalynn clock the thad. The karalynn is beholden. The karalynn is spartan. The corabella does not eat the thad. The corabella is beholden. The corabella is spartan. The corabella is not unalarming. The corabella does not visit the karalynn. The thad clock the corabella. The thad is beholden. The thad does not like the karalynn. If something pantomime the karalynn and the karalynn does not visit the thad then it clock the karalynn. If something clock the corabella then it clock the karalynn. If something clock the jefferson then it is unalarming. If the karalynn pantomime the corabella then the corabella hatch the jefferson. If something hatch the corabella and it does not visit the jefferson then the jefferson clock the karalynn. If something clock the jefferson and it is unalarming then it clock the corabella. If the karalynn is beholden then the karalynn is erogenous. If something clock the jefferson then the jefferson clock the thad. The corabella does not like the jefferson.", "logic": "\nBeholden(jefferson)\nUnalarming(jefferson)\nHatch(jefferson, corabella)\nPantomime(jefferson, thad)\nClock(karalynn, jefferson)\nClock(karalynn, thad)\nBeholden(karalynn)\nSpartan(karalynn)\nnot Clock(corabella, thad)\nBeholden(corabella)\nSpartan(corabella)\nnot Unalarming(corabella)\nnot Pantomime(corabella, karalynn)\nClock(thad, corabella)\nBeholden(thad)\nnot Hatch(thad, karalynn)\nforall x (Pantomime(x, karalynn) and not Pantomime(karalynn, thad) -> Clock(x, karalynn))\nforall x (Clock(x, corabella) -> Clock(x, karalynn))\nforall x (Clock(x, jefferson) -> Unalarming(x))\nPantomime(karalynn, corabella) -> Hatch(corabella, jefferson)\nforall x (Hatch(x, corabella) and not Pantomime(x, jefferson) -> Clock(jefferson, karalynn))\nforall x (Clock(x, jefferson) and Unalarming(x) -> Clock(x, corabella))\nBeholden(karalynn) -> Erogenous(karalynn)\nforall x (Clock(x, jefferson) -> Clock(jefferson, thad))\n\nnot Hatch(corabella, jefferson)\n\nPantomime(karalynn, corabella) -> Hatch(corabella, jefferson) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The merna is viscous. The merna is unmelodic. The merna disapprove the alex. The merna humor the hortense. The thornie befuddle the merna. The thornie befuddle the hortense. The thornie is viscous. The thornie is synoptical. The alex does not eat the hortense. The alex is viscous. The alex is synoptical. The alex is not unmelodic. The alex does not visit the thornie. The hortense befuddle the alex. The hortense is viscous. The hortense does not like the thornie. If something humor the thornie and the thornie does not visit the hortense then it befuddle the thornie. If something befuddle the alex then it befuddle the thornie. If something befuddle the merna then it is unmelodic. If the thornie humor the alex then the alex disapprove the merna. If something disapprove the alex and it does not visit the merna then the merna befuddle the thornie. If something befuddle the merna and it is unmelodic then it befuddle the alex. If the thornie is viscous then the thornie is gripping. If something befuddle the merna then the merna befuddle the hortense. The merna befuddle the thornie.", "logic": "\nViscous(merna)\nUnmelodic(merna)\nDisapprove(merna, alex)\nHumor(merna, hortense)\nBefuddle(thornie, merna)\nBefuddle(thornie, hortense)\nViscous(thornie)\nSynoptical(thornie)\nnot Befuddle(alex, hortense)\nViscous(alex)\nSynoptical(alex)\nnot Unmelodic(alex)\nnot Humor(alex, thornie)\nBefuddle(hortense, alex)\nViscous(hortense)\nnot Disapprove(hortense, thornie)\nforall x (Humor(x, thornie) and not Humor(thornie, hortense) -> Befuddle(x, thornie))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, alex) -> Befuddle(x, thornie))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, merna) -> Unmelodic(x))\nHumor(thornie, alex) -> Disapprove(alex, merna)\nforall x (Disapprove(x, alex) and not Humor(x, merna) -> Befuddle(merna, thornie))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, merna) and Unmelodic(x) -> Befuddle(x, alex))\nViscous(thornie) -> Gripping(thornie)\nforall x (Befuddle(x, merna) -> Befuddle(merna, hortense))\n\nBefuddle(merna, thornie)\n\nforall x (Befuddle(x, alex) -> Befuddle(x, thornie)) <- forall x (Befuddle(x, merna) and Unmelodic(x) -> Befuddle(x, alex)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The marilin is adjective. The marilin is classless. The marilin boogie the evania. The marilin reclaim the legra. The georgette ovenbake the marilin. The georgette ovenbake the legra. The georgette is adjective. The georgette is patellar. The evania does not eat the legra. The evania is adjective. The evania is patellar. The evania is not classless. The evania does not visit the georgette. The legra ovenbake the evania. The legra is adjective. The legra does not like the georgette. If something reclaim the georgette and the georgette does not visit the legra then it ovenbake the georgette. If something ovenbake the evania then it ovenbake the georgette. If something ovenbake the marilin then it is classless. If the georgette reclaim the evania then the evania boogie the marilin. If something boogie the evania and it does not visit the marilin then the marilin ovenbake the georgette. If something ovenbake the marilin and it is classless then it ovenbake the evania. If the georgette is adjective then the georgette is uneventful. If something ovenbake the marilin then the marilin ovenbake the legra. The evania does not eat the georgette.", "logic": "\nAdjective(marilin)\nClassless(marilin)\nBoogie(marilin, evania)\nReclaim(marilin, legra)\nOvenbake(georgette, marilin)\nOvenbake(georgette, legra)\nAdjective(georgette)\nPatellar(georgette)\nnot Ovenbake(evania, legra)\nAdjective(evania)\nPatellar(evania)\nnot Classless(evania)\nnot Reclaim(evania, georgette)\nOvenbake(legra, evania)\nAdjective(legra)\nnot Boogie(legra, georgette)\nforall x (Reclaim(x, georgette) and not Reclaim(georgette, legra) -> Ovenbake(x, georgette))\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, evania) -> Ovenbake(x, georgette))\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, marilin) -> Classless(x))\nReclaim(georgette, evania) -> Boogie(evania, marilin)\nforall x (Boogie(x, evania) and not Reclaim(x, marilin) -> Ovenbake(marilin, georgette))\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, marilin) and Classless(x) -> Ovenbake(x, evania))\nAdjective(georgette) -> Uneventful(georgette)\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, marilin) -> Ovenbake(marilin, legra))\n\nnot Ovenbake(evania, georgette)\n\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, evania) -> Ovenbake(x, georgette)) <- forall x (Ovenbake(x, marilin) and Classless(x) -> Ovenbake(x, evania)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The luisa is paradisiac. The luisa is leering. The luisa riot the emory. The luisa excogitate the aloysius. The bernetta beckon the luisa. The bernetta beckon the aloysius. The bernetta is paradisiac. The bernetta is insoluble. The emory does not eat the aloysius. The emory is paradisiac. The emory is insoluble. The emory is not leering. The emory does not visit the bernetta. The aloysius beckon the emory. The aloysius is paradisiac. The aloysius does not like the bernetta. If something excogitate the bernetta and the bernetta does not visit the aloysius then it beckon the bernetta. If something beckon the emory then it beckon the bernetta. If something beckon the luisa then it is leering. If the bernetta excogitate the emory then the emory riot the luisa. If something riot the emory and it does not visit the luisa then the luisa beckon the bernetta. If something beckon the luisa and it is leering then it beckon the emory. If the bernetta is paradisiac then the bernetta is lyric. If something beckon the luisa then the luisa beckon the aloysius. The luisa beckon the emory.", "logic": "\nParadisiac(luisa)\nLeering(luisa)\nRiot(luisa, emory)\nExcogitate(luisa, aloysius)\nBeckon(bernetta, luisa)\nBeckon(bernetta, aloysius)\nParadisiac(bernetta)\nInsoluble(bernetta)\nnot Beckon(emory, aloysius)\nParadisiac(emory)\nInsoluble(emory)\nnot Leering(emory)\nnot Excogitate(emory, bernetta)\nBeckon(aloysius, emory)\nParadisiac(aloysius)\nnot Riot(aloysius, bernetta)\nforall x (Excogitate(x, bernetta) and not Excogitate(bernetta, aloysius) -> Beckon(x, bernetta))\nforall x (Beckon(x, emory) -> Beckon(x, bernetta))\nforall x (Beckon(x, luisa) -> Leering(x))\nExcogitate(bernetta, emory) -> Riot(emory, luisa)\nforall x (Riot(x, emory) and not Excogitate(x, luisa) -> Beckon(luisa, bernetta))\nforall x (Beckon(x, luisa) and Leering(x) -> Beckon(x, emory))\nParadisiac(bernetta) -> Lyric(bernetta)\nforall x (Beckon(x, luisa) -> Beckon(luisa, aloysius))\n\nBeckon(luisa, emory)\n\nforall x (Beckon(x, luisa) and Leering(x) -> Beckon(x, emory)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The moshe is booted. The moshe is generous. The moshe maturate the jade. The moshe slenderise the elfrieda. The gigi drawl the moshe. The gigi drawl the elfrieda. The gigi is booted. The gigi is driving. The jade does not eat the elfrieda. The jade is booted. The jade is driving. The jade is not generous. The jade does not visit the gigi. The elfrieda drawl the jade. The elfrieda is booted. The elfrieda does not like the gigi. If something slenderise the gigi and the gigi does not visit the elfrieda then it drawl the gigi. If something drawl the jade then it drawl the gigi. If something drawl the moshe then it is generous. If the gigi slenderise the jade then the jade maturate the moshe. If something maturate the jade and it does not visit the moshe then the moshe drawl the gigi. If something drawl the moshe and it is generous then it drawl the jade. If the gigi is booted then the gigi is oriented. If something drawl the moshe then the moshe drawl the elfrieda. The gigi does not visit the elfrieda.", "logic": "\nBooted(moshe)\nGenerous(moshe)\nMaturate(moshe, jade)\nSlenderise(moshe, elfrieda)\nDrawl(gigi, moshe)\nDrawl(gigi, elfrieda)\nBooted(gigi)\nDriving(gigi)\nnot Drawl(jade, elfrieda)\nBooted(jade)\nDriving(jade)\nnot Generous(jade)\nnot Slenderise(jade, gigi)\nDrawl(elfrieda, jade)\nBooted(elfrieda)\nnot Maturate(elfrieda, gigi)\nforall x (Slenderise(x, gigi) and not Slenderise(gigi, elfrieda) -> Drawl(x, gigi))\nforall x (Drawl(x, jade) -> Drawl(x, gigi))\nforall x (Drawl(x, moshe) -> Generous(x))\nSlenderise(gigi, jade) -> Maturate(jade, moshe)\nforall x (Maturate(x, jade) and not Slenderise(x, moshe) -> Drawl(moshe, gigi))\nforall x (Drawl(x, moshe) and Generous(x) -> Drawl(x, jade))\nBooted(gigi) -> Oriented(gigi)\nforall x (Drawl(x, moshe) -> Drawl(moshe, elfrieda))\n\nnot Slenderise(gigi, elfrieda)\n\nnot Slenderise(gigi, elfrieda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The hortensia is adept. The hortensia is bronzy. The hortensia footle the camila. The hortensia overhaul the bathsheba. The ingaberg emulate the hortensia. The ingaberg emulate the bathsheba. The ingaberg is adept. The ingaberg is browned. The camila does not eat the bathsheba. The camila is adept. The camila is browned. The camila is not bronzy. The camila does not visit the ingaberg. The bathsheba emulate the camila. The bathsheba is adept. The bathsheba does not like the ingaberg. If something overhaul the ingaberg and the ingaberg does not visit the bathsheba then it emulate the ingaberg. If something emulate the camila then it emulate the ingaberg. If something emulate the hortensia then it is bronzy. If the ingaberg overhaul the camila then the camila footle the hortensia. If something footle the camila and it does not visit the hortensia then the hortensia emulate the ingaberg. If something emulate the hortensia and it is bronzy then it emulate the camila. If the ingaberg is adept then the ingaberg is tectonic. If something emulate the hortensia then the hortensia emulate the bathsheba. The bathsheba footle the camila.", "logic": "\nAdept(hortensia)\nBronzy(hortensia)\nFootle(hortensia, camila)\nOverhaul(hortensia, bathsheba)\nEmulate(ingaberg, hortensia)\nEmulate(ingaberg, bathsheba)\nAdept(ingaberg)\nBrowned(ingaberg)\nnot Emulate(camila, bathsheba)\nAdept(camila)\nBrowned(camila)\nnot Bronzy(camila)\nnot Overhaul(camila, ingaberg)\nEmulate(bathsheba, camila)\nAdept(bathsheba)\nnot Footle(bathsheba, ingaberg)\nforall x (Overhaul(x, ingaberg) and not Overhaul(ingaberg, bathsheba) -> Emulate(x, ingaberg))\nforall x (Emulate(x, camila) -> Emulate(x, ingaberg))\nforall x (Emulate(x, hortensia) -> Bronzy(x))\nOverhaul(ingaberg, camila) -> Footle(camila, hortensia)\nforall x (Footle(x, camila) and not Overhaul(x, hortensia) -> Emulate(hortensia, ingaberg))\nforall x (Emulate(x, hortensia) and Bronzy(x) -> Emulate(x, camila))\nAdept(ingaberg) -> Tectonic(ingaberg)\nforall x (Emulate(x, hortensia) -> Emulate(hortensia, bathsheba))\n\nFootle(bathsheba, camila)\n\nFootle(bathsheba, camila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The jenni is agrypnotic. The jenni is atrial. The jenni withdraw the diandra. The jenni antagonize the micheline. The lisha whinny the jenni. The lisha whinny the micheline. The lisha is agrypnotic. The lisha is scaled. The diandra does not eat the micheline. The diandra is agrypnotic. The diandra is scaled. The diandra is not atrial. The diandra does not visit the lisha. The micheline whinny the diandra. The micheline is agrypnotic. The micheline does not like the lisha. If something antagonize the lisha and the lisha does not visit the micheline then it whinny the lisha. If something whinny the diandra then it whinny the lisha. If something whinny the jenni then it is atrial. If the lisha antagonize the diandra then the diandra withdraw the jenni. If something withdraw the diandra and it does not visit the jenni then the jenni whinny the lisha. If something whinny the jenni and it is atrial then it whinny the diandra. If the lisha is agrypnotic then the lisha is stabile. If something whinny the jenni then the jenni whinny the micheline. The micheline does not visit the lisha.", "logic": "\nAgrypnotic(jenni)\nAtrial(jenni)\nWithdraw(jenni, diandra)\nAntagonize(jenni, micheline)\nWhinny(lisha, jenni)\nWhinny(lisha, micheline)\nAgrypnotic(lisha)\nScaled(lisha)\nnot Whinny(diandra, micheline)\nAgrypnotic(diandra)\nScaled(diandra)\nnot Atrial(diandra)\nnot Antagonize(diandra, lisha)\nWhinny(micheline, diandra)\nAgrypnotic(micheline)\nnot Withdraw(micheline, lisha)\nforall x (Antagonize(x, lisha) and not Antagonize(lisha, micheline) -> Whinny(x, lisha))\nforall x (Whinny(x, diandra) -> Whinny(x, lisha))\nforall x (Whinny(x, jenni) -> Atrial(x))\nAntagonize(lisha, diandra) -> Withdraw(diandra, jenni)\nforall x (Withdraw(x, diandra) and not Antagonize(x, jenni) -> Whinny(jenni, lisha))\nforall x (Whinny(x, jenni) and Atrial(x) -> Whinny(x, diandra))\nAgrypnotic(lisha) -> Stabile(lisha)\nforall x (Whinny(x, jenni) -> Whinny(jenni, micheline))\n\nnot Antagonize(micheline, lisha)\n\nnot Antagonize(micheline, lisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The shirlee is appressed. The shirlee is pleural. The shirlee symphonize the graig. The shirlee hallow the kristien. The liana ball the shirlee. The liana ball the kristien. The liana is appressed. The liana is epitheliod. The graig does not eat the kristien. The graig is appressed. The graig is epitheliod. The graig is not pleural. The graig does not visit the liana. The kristien ball the graig. The kristien is appressed. The kristien does not like the liana. If something hallow the liana and the liana does not visit the kristien then it ball the liana. If something ball the graig then it ball the liana. If something ball the shirlee then it is pleural. If the liana hallow the graig then the graig symphonize the shirlee. If something symphonize the graig and it does not visit the shirlee then the shirlee ball the liana. If something ball the shirlee and it is pleural then it ball the graig. If the liana is appressed then the liana is aggressive. If something ball the shirlee then the shirlee ball the kristien. The liana symphonize the graig.", "logic": "\nAppressed(shirlee)\nPleural(shirlee)\nSymphonize(shirlee, graig)\nHallow(shirlee, kristien)\nBall(liana, shirlee)\nBall(liana, kristien)\nAppressed(liana)\nEpitheliod(liana)\nnot Ball(graig, kristien)\nAppressed(graig)\nEpitheliod(graig)\nnot Pleural(graig)\nnot Hallow(graig, liana)\nBall(kristien, graig)\nAppressed(kristien)\nnot Symphonize(kristien, liana)\nforall x (Hallow(x, liana) and not Hallow(liana, kristien) -> Ball(x, liana))\nforall x (Ball(x, graig) -> Ball(x, liana))\nforall x (Ball(x, shirlee) -> Pleural(x))\nHallow(liana, graig) -> Symphonize(graig, shirlee)\nforall x (Symphonize(x, graig) and not Hallow(x, shirlee) -> Ball(shirlee, liana))\nforall x (Ball(x, shirlee) and Pleural(x) -> Ball(x, graig))\nAppressed(liana) -> Aggressive(liana)\nforall x (Ball(x, shirlee) -> Ball(shirlee, kristien))\n\nSymphonize(liana, graig)\n\nSymphonize(liana, graig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The phelia does not eat the leonie. The phelia is oaken. The phelia instrument the leonie. The phelia inure the leonie. The phelia inure the elyse. The leonie degenerate the phelia. The leonie degenerate the elyse. The leonie is stony. The leonie is oaken. The leonie is sweetish. The leonie instrument the elyse. The elyse degenerate the leonie. The elyse is stony. The elyse is sweetish. The elyse inure the phelia. The elyse inure the leonie. If the elyse inure the leonie and the elyse is not sedulous then the leonie inure the elyse. If someone degenerate the leonie and they are not sweetish then the leonie does not eat the phelia. If someone degenerate the phelia and the phelia is sweetish then the phelia is not wraithlike. If someone degenerate the phelia then they eat the elyse. If someone is wraithlike then they eat the phelia. If someone degenerate the elyse and the elyse degenerate the leonie then the elyse is wraithlike. If the phelia does not eat the elyse then the phelia inure the leonie. If the phelia inure the leonie then the phelia inure the elyse. The phelia inure the elyse.", "logic": "\nnot Degenerate(phelia, leonie)\nOaken(phelia)\nInstrument(phelia, leonie)\nInure(phelia, leonie)\nInure(phelia, elyse)\nDegenerate(leonie, phelia)\nDegenerate(leonie, elyse)\nStony(leonie)\nOaken(leonie)\nSweetish(leonie)\nInstrument(leonie, elyse)\nDegenerate(elyse, leonie)\nStony(elyse)\nSweetish(elyse)\nInure(elyse, phelia)\nInure(elyse, leonie)\nInure(elyse, leonie) and not Sedulous(elyse) -> Inure(leonie, elyse)\nforall x (Degenerate(x, leonie) and not Sweetish(x) -> not Degenerate(leonie, phelia))\nforall x (Degenerate(x, phelia) and Sweetish(phelia) -> not Wraithlike(phelia))\nforall x (Degenerate(x, phelia) -> Degenerate(x, elyse))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) -> Degenerate(x, phelia))\nforall x (Degenerate(x, elyse) and Degenerate(elyse, leonie) -> Wraithlike(elyse))\nnot Degenerate(phelia, elyse) -> Inure(phelia, leonie)\nInure(phelia, leonie) -> Inure(phelia, elyse)\n\nInure(phelia, elyse)\n\ntherefore Inure(phelia, elyse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The farica does not eat the adolpho. The farica is unofficial. The farica honor the adolpho. The farica filiate the adolpho. The farica filiate the pauline. The adolpho account the farica. The adolpho account the pauline. The adolpho is roiled. The adolpho is unofficial. The adolpho is untaped. The adolpho honor the pauline. The pauline account the adolpho. The pauline is roiled. The pauline is untaped. The pauline filiate the farica. The pauline filiate the adolpho. If the pauline filiate the adolpho and the pauline is not insidious then the adolpho filiate the pauline. If someone account the adolpho and they are not untaped then the adolpho does not eat the farica. If someone account the farica and the farica is untaped then the farica is not wrongful. If someone account the farica then they eat the pauline. If someone is wrongful then they eat the farica. If someone account the pauline and the pauline account the adolpho then the pauline is wrongful. If the farica does not eat the pauline then the farica filiate the adolpho. If the farica filiate the adolpho then the farica filiate the pauline. The adolpho is not roiled.", "logic": "\nnot Account(farica, adolpho)\nUnofficial(farica)\nHonor(farica, adolpho)\nFiliate(farica, adolpho)\nFiliate(farica, pauline)\nAccount(adolpho, farica)\nAccount(adolpho, pauline)\nRoiled(adolpho)\nUnofficial(adolpho)\nUntaped(adolpho)\nHonor(adolpho, pauline)\nAccount(pauline, adolpho)\nRoiled(pauline)\nUntaped(pauline)\nFiliate(pauline, farica)\nFiliate(pauline, adolpho)\nFiliate(pauline, adolpho) and not Insidious(pauline) -> Filiate(adolpho, pauline)\nforall x (Account(x, adolpho) and not Untaped(x) -> not Account(adolpho, farica))\nforall x (Account(x, farica) and Untaped(farica) -> not Wrongful(farica))\nforall x (Account(x, farica) -> Account(x, pauline))\nforall x (Wrongful(x) -> Account(x, farica))\nforall x (Account(x, pauline) and Account(pauline, adolpho) -> Wrongful(pauline))\nnot Account(farica, pauline) -> Filiate(farica, adolpho)\nFiliate(farica, adolpho) -> Filiate(farica, pauline)\n\nnot Roiled(adolpho)\n\ntherefore Roiled(adolpho)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The thurston does not eat the matelda. The thurston is imbalanced. The thurston belabor the matelda. The thurston environ the matelda. The thurston environ the pammy. The matelda bide the thurston. The matelda bide the pammy. The matelda is illiterate. The matelda is imbalanced. The matelda is soignee. The matelda belabor the pammy. The pammy bide the matelda. The pammy is illiterate. The pammy is soignee. The pammy environ the thurston. The pammy environ the matelda. If the pammy environ the matelda and the pammy is not paradisiac then the matelda environ the pammy. If someone bide the matelda and they are not soignee then the matelda does not eat the thurston. If someone bide the thurston and the thurston is soignee then the thurston is not leased. If someone bide the thurston then they eat the pammy. If someone is leased then they eat the thurston. If someone bide the pammy and the pammy bide the matelda then the pammy is leased. If the thurston does not eat the pammy then the thurston environ the matelda. If the thurston environ the matelda then the thurston environ the pammy. The pammy is leased.", "logic": "\nnot Bide(thurston, matelda)\nImbalanced(thurston)\nBelabor(thurston, matelda)\nEnviron(thurston, matelda)\nEnviron(thurston, pammy)\nBide(matelda, thurston)\nBide(matelda, pammy)\nIlliterate(matelda)\nImbalanced(matelda)\nSoignee(matelda)\nBelabor(matelda, pammy)\nBide(pammy, matelda)\nIlliterate(pammy)\nSoignee(pammy)\nEnviron(pammy, thurston)\nEnviron(pammy, matelda)\nEnviron(pammy, matelda) and not Paradisiac(pammy) -> Environ(matelda, pammy)\nforall x (Bide(x, matelda) and not Soignee(x) -> not Bide(matelda, thurston))\nforall x (Bide(x, thurston) and Soignee(thurston) -> not Leased(thurston))\nforall x (Bide(x, thurston) -> Bide(x, pammy))\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Bide(x, thurston))\nforall x (Bide(x, pammy) and Bide(pammy, matelda) -> Leased(pammy))\nnot Bide(thurston, pammy) -> Environ(thurston, matelda)\nEnviron(thurston, matelda) -> Environ(thurston, pammy)\n\nLeased(pammy)\n\nBide(matelda, pammy) and Bide(pammy, matelda) and forall x (Bide(x, pammy) and Bide(pammy, matelda) -> Leased(pammy)) -> therefore Leased(pammy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The camile does not eat the cresa. The camile is coupled. The camile shock the cresa. The camile bemock the cresa. The camile bemock the joshuah. The cresa apprentice the camile. The cresa apprentice the joshuah. The cresa is gingery. The cresa is coupled. The cresa is lxxxvii. The cresa shock the joshuah. The joshuah apprentice the cresa. The joshuah is gingery. The joshuah is lxxxvii. The joshuah bemock the camile. The joshuah bemock the cresa. If the joshuah bemock the cresa and the joshuah is not couchant then the cresa bemock the joshuah. If someone apprentice the cresa and they are not lxxxvii then the cresa does not eat the camile. If someone apprentice the camile and the camile is lxxxvii then the camile is not webbed. If someone apprentice the camile then they eat the joshuah. If someone is webbed then they eat the camile. If someone apprentice the joshuah and the joshuah apprentice the cresa then the joshuah is webbed. If the camile does not eat the joshuah then the camile bemock the cresa. If the camile bemock the cresa then the camile bemock the joshuah. The joshuah is not webbed.", "logic": "\nnot Apprentice(camile, cresa)\nCoupled(camile)\nShock(camile, cresa)\nBemock(camile, cresa)\nBemock(camile, joshuah)\nApprentice(cresa, camile)\nApprentice(cresa, joshuah)\nGingery(cresa)\nCoupled(cresa)\nLxxxvii(cresa)\nShock(cresa, joshuah)\nApprentice(joshuah, cresa)\nGingery(joshuah)\nLxxxvii(joshuah)\nBemock(joshuah, camile)\nBemock(joshuah, cresa)\nBemock(joshuah, cresa) and not Couchant(joshuah) -> Bemock(cresa, joshuah)\nforall x (Apprentice(x, cresa) and not Lxxxvii(x) -> not Apprentice(cresa, camile))\nforall x (Apprentice(x, camile) and Lxxxvii(camile) -> not Webbed(camile))\nforall x (Apprentice(x, camile) -> Apprentice(x, joshuah))\nforall x (Webbed(x) -> Apprentice(x, camile))\nforall x (Apprentice(x, joshuah) and Apprentice(joshuah, cresa) -> Webbed(joshuah))\nnot Apprentice(camile, joshuah) -> Bemock(camile, cresa)\nBemock(camile, cresa) -> Bemock(camile, joshuah)\n\nnot Webbed(joshuah)\n\nApprentice(cresa, joshuah) and Apprentice(joshuah, cresa) and forall x (Apprentice(x, joshuah) and Apprentice(joshuah, cresa) -> Webbed(joshuah)) -> therefore Webbed(joshuah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The kelley does not eat the frederico. The kelley is onerous. The kelley belabour the frederico. The kelley resemble the frederico. The kelley resemble the durant. The frederico joint the kelley. The frederico joint the durant. The frederico is stomachic. The frederico is onerous. The frederico is prosy. The frederico belabour the durant. The durant joint the frederico. The durant is stomachic. The durant is prosy. The durant resemble the kelley. The durant resemble the frederico. If the durant resemble the frederico and the durant is not withering then the frederico resemble the durant. If someone joint the frederico and they are not prosy then the frederico does not eat the kelley. If someone joint the kelley and the kelley is prosy then the kelley is not plundering. If someone joint the kelley then they eat the durant. If someone is plundering then they eat the kelley. If someone joint the durant and the durant joint the frederico then the durant is plundering. If the kelley does not eat the durant then the kelley resemble the frederico. If the kelley resemble the frederico then the kelley resemble the durant. The durant joint the kelley.", "logic": "\nnot Joint(kelley, frederico)\nOnerous(kelley)\nBelabour(kelley, frederico)\nResemble(kelley, frederico)\nResemble(kelley, durant)\nJoint(frederico, kelley)\nJoint(frederico, durant)\nStomachic(frederico)\nOnerous(frederico)\nProsy(frederico)\nBelabour(frederico, durant)\nJoint(durant, frederico)\nStomachic(durant)\nProsy(durant)\nResemble(durant, kelley)\nResemble(durant, frederico)\nResemble(durant, frederico) and not Withering(durant) -> Resemble(frederico, durant)\nforall x (Joint(x, frederico) and not Prosy(x) -> not Joint(frederico, kelley))\nforall x (Joint(x, kelley) and Prosy(kelley) -> not Plundering(kelley))\nforall x (Joint(x, kelley) -> Joint(x, durant))\nforall x (Plundering(x) -> Joint(x, kelley))\nforall x (Joint(x, durant) and Joint(durant, frederico) -> Plundering(durant))\nnot Joint(kelley, durant) -> Resemble(kelley, frederico)\nResemble(kelley, frederico) -> Resemble(kelley, durant)\n\nJoint(durant, kelley)\n\nJoint(frederico, durant) and Joint(durant, frederico) and forall x (Joint(x, durant) and Joint(durant, frederico) -> Plundering(durant)) -> therefore Plundering(durant) Plundering(durant) and forall x (Plundering(x) -> Joint(x, kelley)) -> therefore Joint(durant, kelley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The janella does not eat the dorella. The janella is acetous. The janella reevaluate the dorella. The janella exorcise the dorella. The janella exorcise the tresa. The dorella booze the janella. The dorella booze the tresa. The dorella is cropped. The dorella is acetous. The dorella is lavish. The dorella reevaluate the tresa. The tresa booze the dorella. The tresa is cropped. The tresa is lavish. The tresa exorcise the janella. The tresa exorcise the dorella. If the tresa exorcise the dorella and the tresa is not tracked then the dorella exorcise the tresa. If someone booze the dorella and they are not lavish then the dorella does not eat the janella. If someone booze the janella and the janella is lavish then the janella is not mismatched. If someone booze the janella then they eat the tresa. If someone is mismatched then they eat the janella. If someone booze the tresa and the tresa booze the dorella then the tresa is mismatched. If the janella does not eat the tresa then the janella exorcise the dorella. If the janella exorcise the dorella then the janella exorcise the tresa. The tresa does not eat the janella.", "logic": "\nnot Booze(janella, dorella)\nAcetous(janella)\nReevaluate(janella, dorella)\nExorcise(janella, dorella)\nExorcise(janella, tresa)\nBooze(dorella, janella)\nBooze(dorella, tresa)\nCropped(dorella)\nAcetous(dorella)\nLavish(dorella)\nReevaluate(dorella, tresa)\nBooze(tresa, dorella)\nCropped(tresa)\nLavish(tresa)\nExorcise(tresa, janella)\nExorcise(tresa, dorella)\nExorcise(tresa, dorella) and not Tracked(tresa) -> Exorcise(dorella, tresa)\nforall x (Booze(x, dorella) and not Lavish(x) -> not Booze(dorella, janella))\nforall x (Booze(x, janella) and Lavish(janella) -> not Mismatched(janella))\nforall x (Booze(x, janella) -> Booze(x, tresa))\nforall x (Mismatched(x) -> Booze(x, janella))\nforall x (Booze(x, tresa) and Booze(tresa, dorella) -> Mismatched(tresa))\nnot Booze(janella, tresa) -> Exorcise(janella, dorella)\nExorcise(janella, dorella) -> Exorcise(janella, tresa)\n\nnot Booze(tresa, janella)\n\nBooze(dorella, tresa) and Booze(tresa, dorella) and forall x (Booze(x, tresa) and Booze(tresa, dorella) -> Mismatched(tresa)) -> therefore Mismatched(tresa) Mismatched(tresa) and forall x (Mismatched(x) -> Booze(x, janella)) -> therefore Booze(tresa, janella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The shelba does not eat the katerina. The shelba is brachiopod. The shelba evanesce the katerina. The shelba barge the katerina. The shelba barge the huey. The katerina hike the shelba. The katerina hike the huey. The katerina is cubital. The katerina is brachiopod. The katerina is webby. The katerina evanesce the huey. The huey hike the katerina. The huey is cubital. The huey is webby. The huey barge the shelba. The huey barge the katerina. If the huey barge the katerina and the huey is not renowned then the katerina barge the huey. If someone hike the katerina and they are not webby then the katerina does not eat the shelba. If someone hike the shelba and the shelba is webby then the shelba is not boyish. If someone hike the shelba then they eat the huey. If someone is boyish then they eat the shelba. If someone hike the huey and the huey hike the katerina then the huey is boyish. If the shelba does not eat the huey then the shelba barge the katerina. If the shelba barge the katerina then the shelba barge the huey. The huey hike the huey.", "logic": "\nnot Hike(shelba, katerina)\nBrachiopod(shelba)\nEvanesce(shelba, katerina)\nBarge(shelba, katerina)\nBarge(shelba, huey)\nHike(katerina, shelba)\nHike(katerina, huey)\nCubital(katerina)\nBrachiopod(katerina)\nWebby(katerina)\nEvanesce(katerina, huey)\nHike(huey, katerina)\nCubital(huey)\nWebby(huey)\nBarge(huey, shelba)\nBarge(huey, katerina)\nBarge(huey, katerina) and not Renowned(huey) -> Barge(katerina, huey)\nforall x (Hike(x, katerina) and not Webby(x) -> not Hike(katerina, shelba))\nforall x (Hike(x, shelba) and Webby(shelba) -> not Boyish(shelba))\nforall x (Hike(x, shelba) -> Hike(x, huey))\nforall x (Boyish(x) -> Hike(x, shelba))\nforall x (Hike(x, huey) and Hike(huey, katerina) -> Boyish(huey))\nnot Hike(shelba, huey) -> Barge(shelba, katerina)\nBarge(shelba, katerina) -> Barge(shelba, huey)\n\nHike(huey, huey)\n\nHike(katerina, huey) and Hike(huey, katerina) and forall x (Hike(x, huey) and Hike(huey, katerina) -> Boyish(huey)) -> therefore Boyish(huey) Boyish(huey) and forall x (Boyish(x) -> Hike(x, shelba)) -> therefore Hike(huey, shelba) Hike(huey, shelba) and forall x (Hike(x, shelba) -> Hike(x, huey)) -> therefore Hike(huey, huey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The paolina does not eat the caresse. The paolina is fungous. The paolina extol the caresse. The paolina enquire the caresse. The paolina enquire the matias. The caresse outstare the paolina. The caresse outstare the matias. The caresse is venetian. The caresse is fungous. The caresse is toxic. The caresse extol the matias. The matias outstare the caresse. The matias is venetian. The matias is toxic. The matias enquire the paolina. The matias enquire the caresse. If the matias enquire the caresse and the matias is not lowbrowed then the caresse enquire the matias. If someone outstare the caresse and they are not toxic then the caresse does not eat the paolina. If someone outstare the paolina and the paolina is toxic then the paolina is not bicapsular. If someone outstare the paolina then they eat the matias. If someone is bicapsular then they eat the paolina. If someone outstare the matias and the matias outstare the caresse then the matias is bicapsular. If the paolina does not eat the matias then the paolina enquire the caresse. If the paolina enquire the caresse then the paolina enquire the matias. The matias does not eat the matias.", "logic": "\nnot Outstare(paolina, caresse)\nFungous(paolina)\nExtol(paolina, caresse)\nEnquire(paolina, caresse)\nEnquire(paolina, matias)\nOutstare(caresse, paolina)\nOutstare(caresse, matias)\nVenetian(caresse)\nFungous(caresse)\nToxic(caresse)\nExtol(caresse, matias)\nOutstare(matias, caresse)\nVenetian(matias)\nToxic(matias)\nEnquire(matias, paolina)\nEnquire(matias, caresse)\nEnquire(matias, caresse) and not Lowbrowed(matias) -> Enquire(caresse, matias)\nforall x (Outstare(x, caresse) and not Toxic(x) -> not Outstare(caresse, paolina))\nforall x (Outstare(x, paolina) and Toxic(paolina) -> not Bicapsular(paolina))\nforall x (Outstare(x, paolina) -> Outstare(x, matias))\nforall x (Bicapsular(x) -> Outstare(x, paolina))\nforall x (Outstare(x, matias) and Outstare(matias, caresse) -> Bicapsular(matias))\nnot Outstare(paolina, matias) -> Enquire(paolina, caresse)\nEnquire(paolina, caresse) -> Enquire(paolina, matias)\n\nnot Outstare(matias, matias)\n\nOutstare(caresse, matias) and Outstare(matias, caresse) and forall x (Outstare(x, matias) and Outstare(matias, caresse) -> Bicapsular(matias)) -> therefore Bicapsular(matias) Bicapsular(matias) and forall x (Bicapsular(x) -> Outstare(x, paolina)) -> therefore Outstare(matias, paolina) Outstare(matias, paolina) and forall x (Outstare(x, paolina) -> Outstare(x, matias)) -> therefore Outstare(matias, matias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The husain does not eat the simona. The husain is then. The husain deafen the simona. The husain finish the simona. The husain finish the glynis. The simona guarantee the husain. The simona guarantee the glynis. The simona is salaried. The simona is then. The simona is rhythmical. The simona deafen the glynis. The glynis guarantee the simona. The glynis is salaried. The glynis is rhythmical. The glynis finish the husain. The glynis finish the simona. If the glynis finish the simona and the glynis is not resounding then the simona finish the glynis. If someone guarantee the simona and they are not rhythmical then the simona does not eat the husain. If someone guarantee the husain and the husain is rhythmical then the husain is not helmeted. If someone guarantee the husain then they eat the glynis. If someone is helmeted then they eat the husain. If someone guarantee the glynis and the glynis guarantee the simona then the glynis is helmeted. If the husain does not eat the glynis then the husain finish the simona. If the husain finish the simona then the husain finish the glynis. The husain does not eat the husain.", "logic": "\nnot Guarantee(husain, simona)\nThen(husain)\nDeafen(husain, simona)\nFinish(husain, simona)\nFinish(husain, glynis)\nGuarantee(simona, husain)\nGuarantee(simona, glynis)\nSalaried(simona)\nThen(simona)\nRhythmical(simona)\nDeafen(simona, glynis)\nGuarantee(glynis, simona)\nSalaried(glynis)\nRhythmical(glynis)\nFinish(glynis, husain)\nFinish(glynis, simona)\nFinish(glynis, simona) and not Resounding(glynis) -> Finish(simona, glynis)\nforall x (Guarantee(x, simona) and not Rhythmical(x) -> not Guarantee(simona, husain))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, husain) and Rhythmical(husain) -> not Helmeted(husain))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, husain) -> Guarantee(x, glynis))\nforall x (Helmeted(x) -> Guarantee(x, husain))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, glynis) and Guarantee(glynis, simona) -> Helmeted(glynis))\nnot Guarantee(husain, glynis) -> Finish(husain, simona)\nFinish(husain, simona) -> Finish(husain, glynis)\n\nnot Guarantee(husain, husain)\n\nforall x (Helmeted(x) -> Guarantee(x, husain)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The cherrita does not eat the starla. The cherrita is searing. The cherrita lour the starla. The cherrita scroll the starla. The cherrita scroll the sal. The starla sexualize the cherrita. The starla sexualize the sal. The starla is threefold. The starla is searing. The starla is sphingine. The starla lour the sal. The sal sexualize the starla. The sal is threefold. The sal is sphingine. The sal scroll the cherrita. The sal scroll the starla. If the sal scroll the starla and the sal is not brazilian then the starla scroll the sal. If someone sexualize the starla and they are not sphingine then the starla does not eat the cherrita. If someone sexualize the cherrita and the cherrita is sphingine then the cherrita is not hysteric. If someone sexualize the cherrita then they eat the sal. If someone is hysteric then they eat the cherrita. If someone sexualize the sal and the sal sexualize the starla then the sal is hysteric. If the cherrita does not eat the sal then the cherrita scroll the starla. If the cherrita scroll the starla then the cherrita scroll the sal. The cherrita sexualize the sal.", "logic": "\nnot Sexualize(cherrita, starla)\nSearing(cherrita)\nLour(cherrita, starla)\nScroll(cherrita, starla)\nScroll(cherrita, sal)\nSexualize(starla, cherrita)\nSexualize(starla, sal)\nThreefold(starla)\nSearing(starla)\nSphingine(starla)\nLour(starla, sal)\nSexualize(sal, starla)\nThreefold(sal)\nSphingine(sal)\nScroll(sal, cherrita)\nScroll(sal, starla)\nScroll(sal, starla) and not Brazilian(sal) -> Scroll(starla, sal)\nforall x (Sexualize(x, starla) and not Sphingine(x) -> not Sexualize(starla, cherrita))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, cherrita) and Sphingine(cherrita) -> not Hysteric(cherrita))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, cherrita) -> Sexualize(x, sal))\nforall x (Hysteric(x) -> Sexualize(x, cherrita))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, sal) and Sexualize(sal, starla) -> Hysteric(sal))\nnot Sexualize(cherrita, sal) -> Scroll(cherrita, starla)\nScroll(cherrita, starla) -> Scroll(cherrita, sal)\n\nSexualize(cherrita, sal)\n\nforall x (Sexualize(x, cherrita) -> Sexualize(x, sal)) <- forall x (Hysteric(x) -> Sexualize(x, cherrita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The laurance does not eat the fyodor. The laurance is belated. The laurance uncork the fyodor. The laurance assemble the fyodor. The laurance assemble the mellicent. The fyodor present the laurance. The fyodor present the mellicent. The fyodor is neutral. The fyodor is belated. The fyodor is tortuous. The fyodor uncork the mellicent. The mellicent present the fyodor. The mellicent is neutral. The mellicent is tortuous. The mellicent assemble the laurance. The mellicent assemble the fyodor. If the mellicent assemble the fyodor and the mellicent is not trojan then the fyodor assemble the mellicent. If someone present the fyodor and they are not tortuous then the fyodor does not eat the laurance. If someone present the laurance and the laurance is tortuous then the laurance is not mazed. If someone present the laurance then they eat the mellicent. If someone is mazed then they eat the laurance. If someone present the mellicent and the mellicent present the fyodor then the mellicent is mazed. If the laurance does not eat the mellicent then the laurance assemble the fyodor. If the laurance assemble the fyodor then the laurance assemble the mellicent. The fyodor does not need the mellicent.", "logic": "\nnot Present(laurance, fyodor)\nBelated(laurance)\nUncork(laurance, fyodor)\nAssemble(laurance, fyodor)\nAssemble(laurance, mellicent)\nPresent(fyodor, laurance)\nPresent(fyodor, mellicent)\nNeutral(fyodor)\nBelated(fyodor)\nTortuous(fyodor)\nUncork(fyodor, mellicent)\nPresent(mellicent, fyodor)\nNeutral(mellicent)\nTortuous(mellicent)\nAssemble(mellicent, laurance)\nAssemble(mellicent, fyodor)\nAssemble(mellicent, fyodor) and not Trojan(mellicent) -> Assemble(fyodor, mellicent)\nforall x (Present(x, fyodor) and not Tortuous(x) -> not Present(fyodor, laurance))\nforall x (Present(x, laurance) and Tortuous(laurance) -> not Mazed(laurance))\nforall x (Present(x, laurance) -> Present(x, mellicent))\nforall x (Mazed(x) -> Present(x, laurance))\nforall x (Present(x, mellicent) and Present(mellicent, fyodor) -> Mazed(mellicent))\nnot Present(laurance, mellicent) -> Assemble(laurance, fyodor)\nAssemble(laurance, fyodor) -> Assemble(laurance, mellicent)\n\nnot Assemble(fyodor, mellicent)\n\nAssemble(mellicent, fyodor) and not Trojan(mellicent) -> Assemble(fyodor, mellicent) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The elliot does not eat the blanche. The elliot is footloose. The elliot crape the blanche. The elliot kite the blanche. The elliot kite the bobine. The blanche revoke the elliot. The blanche revoke the bobine. The blanche is legged. The blanche is footloose. The blanche is shivering. The blanche crape the bobine. The bobine revoke the blanche. The bobine is legged. The bobine is shivering. The bobine kite the elliot. The bobine kite the blanche. If the bobine kite the blanche and the bobine is not wary then the blanche kite the bobine. If someone revoke the blanche and they are not shivering then the blanche does not eat the elliot. If someone revoke the elliot and the elliot is shivering then the elliot is not aberdonian. If someone revoke the elliot then they eat the bobine. If someone is aberdonian then they eat the elliot. If someone revoke the bobine and the bobine revoke the blanche then the bobine is aberdonian. If the elliot does not eat the bobine then the elliot kite the blanche. If the elliot kite the blanche then the elliot kite the bobine. The blanche kite the elliot.", "logic": "\nnot Revoke(elliot, blanche)\nFootloose(elliot)\nCrape(elliot, blanche)\nKite(elliot, blanche)\nKite(elliot, bobine)\nRevoke(blanche, elliot)\nRevoke(blanche, bobine)\nLegged(blanche)\nFootloose(blanche)\nShivering(blanche)\nCrape(blanche, bobine)\nRevoke(bobine, blanche)\nLegged(bobine)\nShivering(bobine)\nKite(bobine, elliot)\nKite(bobine, blanche)\nKite(bobine, blanche) and not Wary(bobine) -> Kite(blanche, bobine)\nforall x (Revoke(x, blanche) and not Shivering(x) -> not Revoke(blanche, elliot))\nforall x (Revoke(x, elliot) and Shivering(elliot) -> not Aberdonian(elliot))\nforall x (Revoke(x, elliot) -> Revoke(x, bobine))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Revoke(x, elliot))\nforall x (Revoke(x, bobine) and Revoke(bobine, blanche) -> Aberdonian(bobine))\nnot Revoke(elliot, bobine) -> Kite(elliot, blanche)\nKite(elliot, blanche) -> Kite(elliot, bobine)\n\nKite(blanche, elliot)\n\nKite(blanche, elliot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The casey does not eat the liam. The casey is categoric. The casey crystalise the liam. The casey bare the liam. The casey bare the riane. The liam explore the casey. The liam explore the riane. The liam is subsequent. The liam is categoric. The liam is labial. The liam crystalise the riane. The riane explore the liam. The riane is subsequent. The riane is labial. The riane bare the casey. The riane bare the liam. If the riane bare the liam and the riane is not squalid then the liam bare the riane. If someone explore the liam and they are not labial then the liam does not eat the casey. If someone explore the casey and the casey is labial then the casey is not upset. If someone explore the casey then they eat the riane. If someone is upset then they eat the casey. If someone explore the riane and the riane explore the liam then the riane is upset. If the casey does not eat the riane then the casey bare the liam. If the casey bare the liam then the casey bare the riane. The casey is not labial.", "logic": "\nnot Explore(casey, liam)\nCategoric(casey)\nCrystalise(casey, liam)\nBare(casey, liam)\nBare(casey, riane)\nExplore(liam, casey)\nExplore(liam, riane)\nSubsequent(liam)\nCategoric(liam)\nLabial(liam)\nCrystalise(liam, riane)\nExplore(riane, liam)\nSubsequent(riane)\nLabial(riane)\nBare(riane, casey)\nBare(riane, liam)\nBare(riane, liam) and not Squalid(riane) -> Bare(liam, riane)\nforall x (Explore(x, liam) and not Labial(x) -> not Explore(liam, casey))\nforall x (Explore(x, casey) and Labial(casey) -> not Upset(casey))\nforall x (Explore(x, casey) -> Explore(x, riane))\nforall x (Upset(x) -> Explore(x, casey))\nforall x (Explore(x, riane) and Explore(riane, liam) -> Upset(riane))\nnot Explore(casey, riane) -> Bare(casey, liam)\nBare(casey, liam) -> Bare(casey, riane)\n\nnot Labial(casey)\n\nnot Labial(casey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The rubi does not eat the nellie. The rubi is unequaled. The rubi vulgarize the nellie. The rubi room the nellie. The rubi room the orel. The nellie effectuate the rubi. The nellie effectuate the orel. The nellie is sectarian. The nellie is unequaled. The nellie is drugged. The nellie vulgarize the orel. The orel effectuate the nellie. The orel is sectarian. The orel is drugged. The orel room the rubi. The orel room the nellie. If the orel room the nellie and the orel is not nonfissile then the nellie room the orel. If someone effectuate the nellie and they are not drugged then the nellie does not eat the rubi. If someone effectuate the rubi and the rubi is drugged then the rubi is not pouched. If someone effectuate the rubi then they eat the orel. If someone is pouched then they eat the rubi. If someone effectuate the orel and the orel effectuate the nellie then the orel is pouched. If the rubi does not eat the orel then the rubi room the nellie. If the rubi room the nellie then the rubi room the orel. The nellie is nonfissile.", "logic": "\nnot Effectuate(rubi, nellie)\nUnequaled(rubi)\nVulgarize(rubi, nellie)\nRoom(rubi, nellie)\nRoom(rubi, orel)\nEffectuate(nellie, rubi)\nEffectuate(nellie, orel)\nSectarian(nellie)\nUnequaled(nellie)\nDrugged(nellie)\nVulgarize(nellie, orel)\nEffectuate(orel, nellie)\nSectarian(orel)\nDrugged(orel)\nRoom(orel, rubi)\nRoom(orel, nellie)\nRoom(orel, nellie) and not Nonfissile(orel) -> Room(nellie, orel)\nforall x (Effectuate(x, nellie) and not Drugged(x) -> not Effectuate(nellie, rubi))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, rubi) and Drugged(rubi) -> not Pouched(rubi))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, rubi) -> Effectuate(x, orel))\nforall x (Pouched(x) -> Effectuate(x, rubi))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, orel) and Effectuate(orel, nellie) -> Pouched(orel))\nnot Effectuate(rubi, orel) -> Room(rubi, nellie)\nRoom(rubi, nellie) -> Room(rubi, orel)\n\nNonfissile(nellie)\n\nNonfissile(nellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The carmelia does not eat the cathie. The carmelia is laureled. The carmelia corrode the cathie. The carmelia gibbet the cathie. The carmelia gibbet the lester. The cathie launder the carmelia. The cathie launder the lester. The cathie is semisoft. The cathie is laureled. The cathie is unposed. The cathie corrode the lester. The lester launder the cathie. The lester is semisoft. The lester is unposed. The lester gibbet the carmelia. The lester gibbet the cathie. If the lester gibbet the cathie and the lester is not nonimmune then the cathie gibbet the lester. If someone launder the cathie and they are not unposed then the cathie does not eat the carmelia. If someone launder the carmelia and the carmelia is unposed then the carmelia is not amphoteric. If someone launder the carmelia then they eat the lester. If someone is amphoteric then they eat the carmelia. If someone launder the lester and the lester launder the cathie then the lester is amphoteric. If the carmelia does not eat the lester then the carmelia gibbet the cathie. If the carmelia gibbet the cathie then the carmelia gibbet the lester. The lester does not like the cathie.", "logic": "\nnot Launder(carmelia, cathie)\nLaureled(carmelia)\nCorrode(carmelia, cathie)\nGibbet(carmelia, cathie)\nGibbet(carmelia, lester)\nLaunder(cathie, carmelia)\nLaunder(cathie, lester)\nSemisoft(cathie)\nLaureled(cathie)\nUnposed(cathie)\nCorrode(cathie, lester)\nLaunder(lester, cathie)\nSemisoft(lester)\nUnposed(lester)\nGibbet(lester, carmelia)\nGibbet(lester, cathie)\nGibbet(lester, cathie) and not Nonimmune(lester) -> Gibbet(cathie, lester)\nforall x (Launder(x, cathie) and not Unposed(x) -> not Launder(cathie, carmelia))\nforall x (Launder(x, carmelia) and Unposed(carmelia) -> not Amphoteric(carmelia))\nforall x (Launder(x, carmelia) -> Launder(x, lester))\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) -> Launder(x, carmelia))\nforall x (Launder(x, lester) and Launder(lester, cathie) -> Amphoteric(lester))\nnot Launder(carmelia, lester) -> Gibbet(carmelia, cathie)\nGibbet(carmelia, cathie) -> Gibbet(carmelia, lester)\n\nnot Corrode(lester, cathie)\n\nnot Corrode(lester, cathie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The ileana does not eat the norine. The ileana is overcast. The ileana clew the norine. The ileana clump the norine. The ileana clump the von. The norine duplicate the ileana. The norine duplicate the von. The norine is egoistical. The norine is overcast. The norine is nineteen. The norine clew the von. The von duplicate the norine. The von is egoistical. The von is nineteen. The von clump the ileana. The von clump the norine. If the von clump the norine and the von is not fecal then the norine clump the von. If someone duplicate the norine and they are not nineteen then the norine does not eat the ileana. If someone duplicate the ileana and the ileana is nineteen then the ileana is not abnaki. If someone duplicate the ileana then they eat the von. If someone is abnaki then they eat the ileana. If someone duplicate the von and the von duplicate the norine then the von is abnaki. If the ileana does not eat the von then the ileana clump the norine. If the ileana clump the norine then the ileana clump the von. The ileana is fecal.", "logic": "\nnot Duplicate(ileana, norine)\nOvercast(ileana)\nClew(ileana, norine)\nClump(ileana, norine)\nClump(ileana, von)\nDuplicate(norine, ileana)\nDuplicate(norine, von)\nEgoistical(norine)\nOvercast(norine)\nNineteen(norine)\nClew(norine, von)\nDuplicate(von, norine)\nEgoistical(von)\nNineteen(von)\nClump(von, ileana)\nClump(von, norine)\nClump(von, norine) and not Fecal(von) -> Clump(norine, von)\nforall x (Duplicate(x, norine) and not Nineteen(x) -> not Duplicate(norine, ileana))\nforall x (Duplicate(x, ileana) and Nineteen(ileana) -> not Abnaki(ileana))\nforall x (Duplicate(x, ileana) -> Duplicate(x, von))\nforall x (Abnaki(x) -> Duplicate(x, ileana))\nforall x (Duplicate(x, von) and Duplicate(von, norine) -> Abnaki(von))\nnot Duplicate(ileana, von) -> Clump(ileana, norine)\nClump(ileana, norine) -> Clump(ileana, von)\n\nFecal(ileana)\n\nFecal(ileana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The trixie anodize the marcia. The trixie queen the marcia. The trixie is choppy. The trixie is fruiting. The trixie is lyric. The trixie is unshaded. The trixie is herculean. The trixie embark the marcia. The marcia anodize the trixie. The marcia queen the trixie. The marcia is choppy. The marcia is fruiting. The marcia is lyric. The marcia is unshaded. The marcia is herculean. The marcia embark the trixie. If something is lyric then it queen the marcia. If something anodize the marcia and it is choppy then it is lyric. If something is herculean and it anodize the marcia then it embark the marcia. If something embark the trixie then it queen the trixie. If something queen the marcia and it anodize the trixie then it embark the marcia. If something anodize the trixie and it embark the marcia then the marcia is lyric. If something is lyric and it anodize the trixie then the trixie queen the marcia. If something embark the marcia then it anodize the marcia. The marcia queen the trixie.", "logic": "\nAnodize(trixie, marcia)\nQueen(trixie, marcia)\nChoppy(trixie)\nFruiting(trixie)\nLyric(trixie)\nUnshaded(trixie)\nHerculean(trixie)\nEmbark(trixie, marcia)\nAnodize(marcia, trixie)\nQueen(marcia, trixie)\nChoppy(marcia)\nFruiting(marcia)\nLyric(marcia)\nUnshaded(marcia)\nHerculean(marcia)\nEmbark(marcia, trixie)\nforall x (Lyric(x) -> Queen(x, marcia))\nforall x (Anodize(x, marcia) and Choppy(x) -> Lyric(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) and Anodize(x, marcia) -> Embark(x, marcia))\nforall x (Embark(x, trixie) -> Queen(x, trixie))\nforall x (Queen(x, marcia) and Anodize(x, trixie) -> Embark(x, marcia))\nforall x (Anodize(x, trixie) and Embark(x, marcia) -> Lyric(marcia))\nforall x (Lyric(x) and Anodize(x, trixie) -> Queen(trixie, marcia))\nforall x (Embark(x, marcia) -> Anodize(x, marcia))\n\nQueen(marcia, trixie)\n\ntherefore Queen(marcia, trixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The leelah suffice the karolina. The leelah want the karolina. The leelah is unable. The leelah is antisocial. The leelah is brummagem. The leelah is obdurate. The leelah is dyspneal. The leelah bleep the karolina. The karolina suffice the leelah. The karolina want the leelah. The karolina is unable. The karolina is antisocial. The karolina is brummagem. The karolina is obdurate. The karolina is dyspneal. The karolina bleep the leelah. If something is brummagem then it want the karolina. If something suffice the karolina and it is unable then it is brummagem. If something is dyspneal and it suffice the karolina then it bleep the karolina. If something bleep the leelah then it want the leelah. If something want the karolina and it suffice the leelah then it bleep the karolina. If something suffice the leelah and it bleep the karolina then the karolina is brummagem. If something is brummagem and it suffice the leelah then the leelah want the karolina. If something bleep the karolina then it suffice the karolina. The karolina is not dyspneal.", "logic": "\nSuffice(leelah, karolina)\nWant(leelah, karolina)\nUnable(leelah)\nAntisocial(leelah)\nBrummagem(leelah)\nObdurate(leelah)\nDyspneal(leelah)\nBleep(leelah, karolina)\nSuffice(karolina, leelah)\nWant(karolina, leelah)\nUnable(karolina)\nAntisocial(karolina)\nBrummagem(karolina)\nObdurate(karolina)\nDyspneal(karolina)\nBleep(karolina, leelah)\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Want(x, karolina))\nforall x (Suffice(x, karolina) and Unable(x) -> Brummagem(x))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and Suffice(x, karolina) -> Bleep(x, karolina))\nforall x (Bleep(x, leelah) -> Want(x, leelah))\nforall x (Want(x, karolina) and Suffice(x, leelah) -> Bleep(x, karolina))\nforall x (Suffice(x, leelah) and Bleep(x, karolina) -> Brummagem(karolina))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) and Suffice(x, leelah) -> Want(leelah, karolina))\nforall x (Bleep(x, karolina) -> Suffice(x, karolina))\n\nnot Dyspneal(karolina)\n\ntherefore Dyspneal(karolina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The lisa scotch the felicity. The lisa immerse the felicity. The lisa is fascist. The lisa is centennial. The lisa is analeptic. The lisa is enervating. The lisa is rural. The lisa ignore the felicity. The felicity scotch the lisa. The felicity immerse the lisa. The felicity is fascist. The felicity is centennial. The felicity is analeptic. The felicity is enervating. The felicity is rural. The felicity ignore the lisa. If something is analeptic then it immerse the felicity. If something scotch the felicity and it is fascist then it is analeptic. If something is rural and it scotch the felicity then it ignore the felicity. If something ignore the lisa then it immerse the lisa. If something immerse the felicity and it scotch the lisa then it ignore the felicity. If something scotch the lisa and it ignore the felicity then the felicity is analeptic. If something is analeptic and it scotch the lisa then the lisa immerse the felicity. If something ignore the felicity then it scotch the felicity. The felicity immerse the felicity.", "logic": "\nScotch(lisa, felicity)\nImmerse(lisa, felicity)\nFascist(lisa)\nCentennial(lisa)\nAnaleptic(lisa)\nEnervating(lisa)\nRural(lisa)\nIgnore(lisa, felicity)\nScotch(felicity, lisa)\nImmerse(felicity, lisa)\nFascist(felicity)\nCentennial(felicity)\nAnaleptic(felicity)\nEnervating(felicity)\nRural(felicity)\nIgnore(felicity, lisa)\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Immerse(x, felicity))\nforall x (Scotch(x, felicity) and Fascist(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Rural(x) and Scotch(x, felicity) -> Ignore(x, felicity))\nforall x (Ignore(x, lisa) -> Immerse(x, lisa))\nforall x (Immerse(x, felicity) and Scotch(x, lisa) -> Ignore(x, felicity))\nforall x (Scotch(x, lisa) and Ignore(x, felicity) -> Analeptic(felicity))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) and Scotch(x, lisa) -> Immerse(lisa, felicity))\nforall x (Ignore(x, felicity) -> Scotch(x, felicity))\n\nImmerse(felicity, felicity)\n\nAnaleptic(felicity) and forall x (Analeptic(x) -> Immerse(x, felicity)) -> therefore Immerse(felicity, felicity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The skelly spotlight the gwenore. The skelly scrag the gwenore. The skelly is potbellied. The skelly is unified. The skelly is basophilic. The skelly is wailing. The skelly is ostensive. The skelly amass the gwenore. The gwenore spotlight the skelly. The gwenore scrag the skelly. The gwenore is potbellied. The gwenore is unified. The gwenore is basophilic. The gwenore is wailing. The gwenore is ostensive. The gwenore amass the skelly. If something is basophilic then it scrag the gwenore. If something spotlight the gwenore and it is potbellied then it is basophilic. If something is ostensive and it spotlight the gwenore then it amass the gwenore. If something amass the skelly then it scrag the skelly. If something scrag the gwenore and it spotlight the skelly then it amass the gwenore. If something spotlight the skelly and it amass the gwenore then the gwenore is basophilic. If something is basophilic and it spotlight the skelly then the skelly scrag the gwenore. If something amass the gwenore then it spotlight the gwenore. The gwenore does not eat the gwenore.", "logic": "\nSpotlight(skelly, gwenore)\nScrag(skelly, gwenore)\nPotbellied(skelly)\nUnified(skelly)\nBasophilic(skelly)\nWailing(skelly)\nOstensive(skelly)\nAmass(skelly, gwenore)\nSpotlight(gwenore, skelly)\nScrag(gwenore, skelly)\nPotbellied(gwenore)\nUnified(gwenore)\nBasophilic(gwenore)\nWailing(gwenore)\nOstensive(gwenore)\nAmass(gwenore, skelly)\nforall x (Basophilic(x) -> Scrag(x, gwenore))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, gwenore) and Potbellied(x) -> Basophilic(x))\nforall x (Ostensive(x) and Spotlight(x, gwenore) -> Amass(x, gwenore))\nforall x (Amass(x, skelly) -> Scrag(x, skelly))\nforall x (Scrag(x, gwenore) and Spotlight(x, skelly) -> Amass(x, gwenore))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, skelly) and Amass(x, gwenore) -> Basophilic(gwenore))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) and Spotlight(x, skelly) -> Scrag(skelly, gwenore))\nforall x (Amass(x, gwenore) -> Spotlight(x, gwenore))\n\nnot Scrag(gwenore, gwenore)\n\nBasophilic(gwenore) and forall x (Basophilic(x) -> Scrag(x, gwenore)) -> therefore Scrag(gwenore, gwenore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The freida outcrop the ardath. The freida secure the ardath. The freida is untucked. The freida is comradely. The freida is blind. The freida is scapular. The freida is unhappy. The freida solace the ardath. The ardath outcrop the freida. The ardath secure the freida. The ardath is untucked. The ardath is comradely. The ardath is blind. The ardath is scapular. The ardath is unhappy. The ardath solace the freida. If something is blind then it secure the ardath. If something outcrop the ardath and it is untucked then it is blind. If something is unhappy and it outcrop the ardath then it solace the ardath. If something solace the freida then it secure the freida. If something secure the ardath and it outcrop the freida then it solace the ardath. If something outcrop the freida and it solace the ardath then the ardath is blind. If something is blind and it outcrop the freida then the freida secure the ardath. If something solace the ardath then it outcrop the ardath. The ardath solace the ardath.", "logic": "\nOutcrop(freida, ardath)\nSecure(freida, ardath)\nUntucked(freida)\nComradely(freida)\nBlind(freida)\nScapular(freida)\nUnhappy(freida)\nSolace(freida, ardath)\nOutcrop(ardath, freida)\nSecure(ardath, freida)\nUntucked(ardath)\nComradely(ardath)\nBlind(ardath)\nScapular(ardath)\nUnhappy(ardath)\nSolace(ardath, freida)\nforall x (Blind(x) -> Secure(x, ardath))\nforall x (Outcrop(x, ardath) and Untucked(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Unhappy(x) and Outcrop(x, ardath) -> Solace(x, ardath))\nforall x (Solace(x, freida) -> Secure(x, freida))\nforall x (Secure(x, ardath) and Outcrop(x, freida) -> Solace(x, ardath))\nforall x (Outcrop(x, freida) and Solace(x, ardath) -> Blind(ardath))\nforall x (Blind(x) and Outcrop(x, freida) -> Secure(freida, ardath))\nforall x (Solace(x, ardath) -> Outcrop(x, ardath))\n\nSolace(ardath, ardath)\n\nBlind(ardath) and forall x (Blind(x) -> Secure(x, ardath)) -> therefore Secure(ardath, ardath) Secure(ardath, ardath) and Outcrop(ardath, freida) and forall x (Secure(x, ardath) and Outcrop(x, freida) -> Solace(x, ardath)) -> therefore Solace(ardath, ardath)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The mahmoud trademark the thomasina. The mahmoud withhold the thomasina. The mahmoud is melted. The mahmoud is caudate. The mahmoud is next. The mahmoud is noncaloric. The mahmoud is worthwhile. The mahmoud civilize the thomasina. The thomasina trademark the mahmoud. The thomasina withhold the mahmoud. The thomasina is melted. The thomasina is caudate. The thomasina is next. The thomasina is noncaloric. The thomasina is worthwhile. The thomasina civilize the mahmoud. If something is next then it withhold the thomasina. If something trademark the thomasina and it is melted then it is next. If something is worthwhile and it trademark the thomasina then it civilize the thomasina. If something civilize the mahmoud then it withhold the mahmoud. If something withhold the thomasina and it trademark the mahmoud then it civilize the thomasina. If something trademark the mahmoud and it civilize the thomasina then the thomasina is next. If something is next and it trademark the mahmoud then the mahmoud withhold the thomasina. If something civilize the thomasina then it trademark the thomasina. The thomasina does not see the thomasina.", "logic": "\nTrademark(mahmoud, thomasina)\nWithhold(mahmoud, thomasina)\nMelted(mahmoud)\nCaudate(mahmoud)\nNext(mahmoud)\nNoncaloric(mahmoud)\nWorthwhile(mahmoud)\nCivilize(mahmoud, thomasina)\nTrademark(thomasina, mahmoud)\nWithhold(thomasina, mahmoud)\nMelted(thomasina)\nCaudate(thomasina)\nNext(thomasina)\nNoncaloric(thomasina)\nWorthwhile(thomasina)\nCivilize(thomasina, mahmoud)\nforall x (Next(x) -> Withhold(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Trademark(x, thomasina) and Melted(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) and Trademark(x, thomasina) -> Civilize(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Civilize(x, mahmoud) -> Withhold(x, mahmoud))\nforall x (Withhold(x, thomasina) and Trademark(x, mahmoud) -> Civilize(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Trademark(x, mahmoud) and Civilize(x, thomasina) -> Next(thomasina))\nforall x (Next(x) and Trademark(x, mahmoud) -> Withhold(mahmoud, thomasina))\nforall x (Civilize(x, thomasina) -> Trademark(x, thomasina))\n\nnot Civilize(thomasina, thomasina)\n\nNext(thomasina) and forall x (Next(x) -> Withhold(x, thomasina)) -> therefore Withhold(thomasina, thomasina) Withhold(thomasina, thomasina) and Trademark(thomasina, mahmoud) and forall x (Withhold(x, thomasina) and Trademark(x, mahmoud) -> Civilize(x, thomasina)) -> therefore Civilize(thomasina, thomasina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The annalee rescind the peirce. The annalee reword the peirce. The annalee is mandatory. The annalee is arced. The annalee is unerect. The annalee is stunned. The annalee is recurved. The annalee lurch the peirce. The peirce rescind the annalee. The peirce reword the annalee. The peirce is mandatory. The peirce is arced. The peirce is unerect. The peirce is stunned. The peirce is recurved. The peirce lurch the annalee. If something is unerect then it reword the peirce. If something rescind the peirce and it is mandatory then it is unerect. If something is recurved and it rescind the peirce then it lurch the peirce. If something lurch the annalee then it reword the annalee. If something reword the peirce and it rescind the annalee then it lurch the peirce. If something rescind the annalee and it lurch the peirce then the peirce is unerect. If something is unerect and it rescind the annalee then the annalee reword the peirce. If something lurch the peirce then it rescind the peirce. The peirce rescind the peirce.", "logic": "\nRescind(annalee, peirce)\nReword(annalee, peirce)\nMandatory(annalee)\nArced(annalee)\nUnerect(annalee)\nStunned(annalee)\nRecurved(annalee)\nLurch(annalee, peirce)\nRescind(peirce, annalee)\nReword(peirce, annalee)\nMandatory(peirce)\nArced(peirce)\nUnerect(peirce)\nStunned(peirce)\nRecurved(peirce)\nLurch(peirce, annalee)\nforall x (Unerect(x) -> Reword(x, peirce))\nforall x (Rescind(x, peirce) and Mandatory(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Rescind(x, peirce) -> Lurch(x, peirce))\nforall x (Lurch(x, annalee) -> Reword(x, annalee))\nforall x (Reword(x, peirce) and Rescind(x, annalee) -> Lurch(x, peirce))\nforall x (Rescind(x, annalee) and Lurch(x, peirce) -> Unerect(peirce))\nforall x (Unerect(x) and Rescind(x, annalee) -> Reword(annalee, peirce))\nforall x (Lurch(x, peirce) -> Rescind(x, peirce))\n\nRescind(peirce, peirce)\n\nUnerect(peirce) and forall x (Unerect(x) -> Reword(x, peirce)) -> therefore Reword(peirce, peirce) Reword(peirce, peirce) and Rescind(peirce, annalee) and forall x (Reword(x, peirce) and Rescind(x, annalee) -> Lurch(x, peirce)) -> therefore Lurch(peirce, peirce) Lurch(peirce, peirce) and forall x (Lurch(x, peirce) -> Rescind(x, peirce)) -> therefore Rescind(peirce, peirce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The dierdre housekeep the hetty. The dierdre hydrolyze the hetty. The dierdre is auriform. The dierdre is sedative. The dierdre is vinaceous. The dierdre is masoretic. The dierdre is visualised. The dierdre clothe the hetty. The hetty housekeep the dierdre. The hetty hydrolyze the dierdre. The hetty is auriform. The hetty is sedative. The hetty is vinaceous. The hetty is masoretic. The hetty is visualised. The hetty clothe the dierdre. If something is vinaceous then it hydrolyze the hetty. If something housekeep the hetty and it is auriform then it is vinaceous. If something is visualised and it housekeep the hetty then it clothe the hetty. If something clothe the dierdre then it hydrolyze the dierdre. If something hydrolyze the hetty and it housekeep the dierdre then it clothe the hetty. If something housekeep the dierdre and it clothe the hetty then the hetty is vinaceous. If something is vinaceous and it housekeep the dierdre then the dierdre hydrolyze the hetty. If something clothe the hetty then it housekeep the hetty. The hetty does not chase the hetty.", "logic": "\nHousekeep(dierdre, hetty)\nHydrolyze(dierdre, hetty)\nAuriform(dierdre)\nSedative(dierdre)\nVinaceous(dierdre)\nMasoretic(dierdre)\nVisualised(dierdre)\nClothe(dierdre, hetty)\nHousekeep(hetty, dierdre)\nHydrolyze(hetty, dierdre)\nAuriform(hetty)\nSedative(hetty)\nVinaceous(hetty)\nMasoretic(hetty)\nVisualised(hetty)\nClothe(hetty, dierdre)\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Hydrolyze(x, hetty))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, hetty) and Auriform(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) and Housekeep(x, hetty) -> Clothe(x, hetty))\nforall x (Clothe(x, dierdre) -> Hydrolyze(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Hydrolyze(x, hetty) and Housekeep(x, dierdre) -> Clothe(x, hetty))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, dierdre) and Clothe(x, hetty) -> Vinaceous(hetty))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) and Housekeep(x, dierdre) -> Hydrolyze(dierdre, hetty))\nforall x (Clothe(x, hetty) -> Housekeep(x, hetty))\n\nnot Housekeep(hetty, hetty)\n\nVinaceous(hetty) and forall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Hydrolyze(x, hetty)) -> therefore Hydrolyze(hetty, hetty) Hydrolyze(hetty, hetty) and Housekeep(hetty, dierdre) and forall x (Hydrolyze(x, hetty) and Housekeep(x, dierdre) -> Clothe(x, hetty)) -> therefore Clothe(hetty, hetty) Clothe(hetty, hetty) and forall x (Clothe(x, hetty) -> Housekeep(x, hetty)) -> therefore Housekeep(hetty, hetty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The darin sleek the henrik. The darin sideswipe the henrik. The darin is parttime. The darin is ascitic. The darin is skeptical. The darin is subsidiary. The darin is deathly. The darin smooth the henrik. The henrik sleek the darin. The henrik sideswipe the darin. The henrik is parttime. The henrik is ascitic. The henrik is skeptical. The henrik is subsidiary. The henrik is deathly. The henrik smooth the darin. If something is skeptical then it sideswipe the henrik. If something sleek the henrik and it is parttime then it is skeptical. If something is deathly and it sleek the henrik then it smooth the henrik. If something smooth the darin then it sideswipe the darin. If something sideswipe the henrik and it sleek the darin then it smooth the henrik. If something sleek the darin and it smooth the henrik then the henrik is skeptical. If something is skeptical and it sleek the darin then the darin sideswipe the henrik. If something smooth the henrik then it sleek the henrik. The darin does not eat the darin.", "logic": "\nSleek(darin, henrik)\nSideswipe(darin, henrik)\nParttime(darin)\nAscitic(darin)\nSkeptical(darin)\nSubsidiary(darin)\nDeathly(darin)\nSmooth(darin, henrik)\nSleek(henrik, darin)\nSideswipe(henrik, darin)\nParttime(henrik)\nAscitic(henrik)\nSkeptical(henrik)\nSubsidiary(henrik)\nDeathly(henrik)\nSmooth(henrik, darin)\nforall x (Skeptical(x) -> Sideswipe(x, henrik))\nforall x (Sleek(x, henrik) and Parttime(x) -> Skeptical(x))\nforall x (Deathly(x) and Sleek(x, henrik) -> Smooth(x, henrik))\nforall x (Smooth(x, darin) -> Sideswipe(x, darin))\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, henrik) and Sleek(x, darin) -> Smooth(x, henrik))\nforall x (Sleek(x, darin) and Smooth(x, henrik) -> Skeptical(henrik))\nforall x (Skeptical(x) and Sleek(x, darin) -> Sideswipe(darin, henrik))\nforall x (Smooth(x, henrik) -> Sleek(x, henrik))\n\nnot Sideswipe(darin, darin)\n\nforall x (Smooth(x, darin) -> Sideswipe(x, darin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The terrel festoon the minette. The terrel prorogue the minette. The terrel is larboard. The terrel is dutch. The terrel is peristylar. The terrel is turbid. The terrel is torturous. The terrel sellotape the minette. The minette festoon the terrel. The minette prorogue the terrel. The minette is larboard. The minette is dutch. The minette is peristylar. The minette is turbid. The minette is torturous. The minette sellotape the terrel. If something is peristylar then it prorogue the minette. If something festoon the minette and it is larboard then it is peristylar. If something is torturous and it festoon the minette then it sellotape the minette. If something sellotape the terrel then it prorogue the terrel. If something prorogue the minette and it festoon the terrel then it sellotape the minette. If something festoon the terrel and it sellotape the minette then the minette is peristylar. If something is peristylar and it festoon the terrel then the terrel prorogue the minette. If something sellotape the minette then it festoon the minette. The terrel sellotape the terrel.", "logic": "\nFestoon(terrel, minette)\nProrogue(terrel, minette)\nLarboard(terrel)\nDutch(terrel)\nPeristylar(terrel)\nTurbid(terrel)\nTorturous(terrel)\nSellotape(terrel, minette)\nFestoon(minette, terrel)\nProrogue(minette, terrel)\nLarboard(minette)\nDutch(minette)\nPeristylar(minette)\nTurbid(minette)\nTorturous(minette)\nSellotape(minette, terrel)\nforall x (Peristylar(x) -> Prorogue(x, minette))\nforall x (Festoon(x, minette) and Larboard(x) -> Peristylar(x))\nforall x (Torturous(x) and Festoon(x, minette) -> Sellotape(x, minette))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, terrel) -> Prorogue(x, terrel))\nforall x (Prorogue(x, minette) and Festoon(x, terrel) -> Sellotape(x, minette))\nforall x (Festoon(x, terrel) and Sellotape(x, minette) -> Peristylar(minette))\nforall x (Peristylar(x) and Festoon(x, terrel) -> Prorogue(terrel, minette))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, minette) -> Festoon(x, minette))\n\nSellotape(terrel, terrel)\n\nSellotape(terrel, terrel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "Aeriel is inactive. Emalee is semilunar. Phebe is milky. If Phebe is inactive then Phebe is eatable. If Aeriel is collinear then Aeriel is semilunar. If someone is revised and clxx then they are eatable. Quiet people are revised. All inactive, eatable people are milky. If Aeriel is inactive and Aeriel is revised then Aeriel is clxx. Phebe is milky.", "logic": "\nInactive(aeriel)\nSemilunar(emalee)\nMilky(phebe)\nInactive(phebe) -> Eatable(phebe)\nCollinear(aeriel) -> Semilunar(aeriel)\nforall x (Revised(x) and Clxx(x) -> Eatable(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) -> Revised(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) and Eatable(x) -> Milky(x))\nInactive(aeriel) and Revised(aeriel) -> Clxx(aeriel)\n\nMilky(phebe)\n\ntherefore Milky(phebe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Lilia is bouncing. Berk is valiant. Buster is devalued. If Buster is bouncing then Buster is upraised. If Lilia is threefold then Lilia is valiant. If someone is embroiled and imitation then they are upraised. Quiet people are embroiled. All bouncing, upraised people are devalued. If Lilia is bouncing and Lilia is embroiled then Lilia is imitation. Buster is not devalued.", "logic": "\nBouncing(lilia)\nValiant(berk)\nDevalued(buster)\nBouncing(buster) -> Upraised(buster)\nThreefold(lilia) -> Valiant(lilia)\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and Imitation(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Bouncing(x) -> Embroiled(x))\nforall x (Bouncing(x) and Upraised(x) -> Devalued(x))\nBouncing(lilia) and Embroiled(lilia) -> Imitation(lilia)\n\nnot Devalued(buster)\n\ntherefore Devalued(buster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Binky is figured. Cresa is inwrought. Caressa is alpine. If Caressa is figured then Caressa is vicinal. If Binky is radiate then Binky is inwrought. If someone is dentate and brimful then they are vicinal. Quiet people are dentate. All figured, vicinal people are alpine. If Binky is figured and Binky is dentate then Binky is brimful. Binky is dentate.", "logic": "\nFigured(binky)\nInwrought(cresa)\nAlpine(caressa)\nFigured(caressa) -> Vicinal(caressa)\nRadiate(binky) -> Inwrought(binky)\nforall x (Dentate(x) and Brimful(x) -> Vicinal(x))\nforall x (Figured(x) -> Dentate(x))\nforall x (Figured(x) and Vicinal(x) -> Alpine(x))\nFigured(binky) and Dentate(binky) -> Brimful(binky)\n\nDentate(binky)\n\nFigured(binky) and forall x (Figured(x) -> Dentate(x)) -> therefore Dentate(binky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Hesther is grabby. Adore is unemphatic. Vivianne is thawed. If Vivianne is grabby then Vivianne is inactive. If Hesther is mirthless then Hesther is unemphatic. If someone is sightly and oppositive then they are inactive. Quiet people are sightly. All grabby, inactive people are thawed. If Hesther is grabby and Hesther is sightly then Hesther is oppositive. Hesther is not sightly.", "logic": "\nGrabby(hesther)\nUnemphatic(adore)\nThawed(vivianne)\nGrabby(vivianne) -> Inactive(vivianne)\nMirthless(hesther) -> Unemphatic(hesther)\nforall x (Sightly(x) and Oppositive(x) -> Inactive(x))\nforall x (Grabby(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Grabby(x) and Inactive(x) -> Thawed(x))\nGrabby(hesther) and Sightly(hesther) -> Oppositive(hesther)\n\nnot Sightly(hesther)\n\nGrabby(hesther) and forall x (Grabby(x) -> Sightly(x)) -> therefore Sightly(hesther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Buck is volute. Wells is positive. Zilvia is assisted. If Zilvia is volute then Zilvia is expansile. If Buck is flustered then Buck is positive. If someone is vestigial and befogged then they are expansile. Quiet people are vestigial. All volute, expansile people are assisted. If Buck is volute and Buck is vestigial then Buck is befogged. Buck is befogged.", "logic": "\nVolute(buck)\nPositive(wells)\nAssisted(zilvia)\nVolute(zilvia) -> Expansile(zilvia)\nFlustered(buck) -> Positive(buck)\nforall x (Vestigial(x) and Befogged(x) -> Expansile(x))\nforall x (Volute(x) -> Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Volute(x) and Expansile(x) -> Assisted(x))\nVolute(buck) and Vestigial(buck) -> Befogged(buck)\n\nBefogged(buck)\n\nVolute(buck) and forall x (Volute(x) -> Vestigial(x)) -> therefore Vestigial(buck) Volute(buck) and Vestigial(buck) and Volute(buck) and Vestigial(buck) -> Befogged(buck) -> therefore Befogged(buck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Bunni is spavined. Dolora is bicorned. Paloma is orotund. If Paloma is spavined then Paloma is incoherent. If Bunni is ferial then Bunni is bicorned. If someone is spacial and appetent then they are incoherent. Quiet people are spacial. All spavined, incoherent people are orotund. If Bunni is spavined and Bunni is spacial then Bunni is appetent. Bunni is not appetent.", "logic": "\nSpavined(bunni)\nBicorned(dolora)\nOrotund(paloma)\nSpavined(paloma) -> Incoherent(paloma)\nFerial(bunni) -> Bicorned(bunni)\nforall x (Spacial(x) and Appetent(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Spavined(x) -> Spacial(x))\nforall x (Spavined(x) and Incoherent(x) -> Orotund(x))\nSpavined(bunni) and Spacial(bunni) -> Appetent(bunni)\n\nnot Appetent(bunni)\n\nSpavined(bunni) and forall x (Spavined(x) -> Spacial(x)) -> therefore Spacial(bunni) Spavined(bunni) and Spacial(bunni) and Spavined(bunni) and Spacial(bunni) -> Appetent(bunni) -> therefore Appetent(bunni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Benjamen is loosened. Clay is eukaryotic. Brandice is tattered. If Brandice is loosened then Brandice is beaked. If Benjamen is condolent then Benjamen is eukaryotic. If someone is nocent and boeotian then they are beaked. Quiet people are nocent. All loosened, beaked people are tattered. If Benjamen is loosened and Benjamen is nocent then Benjamen is boeotian. Benjamen is beaked.", "logic": "\nLoosened(benjamen)\nEukaryotic(clay)\nTattered(brandice)\nLoosened(brandice) -> Beaked(brandice)\nCondolent(benjamen) -> Eukaryotic(benjamen)\nforall x (Nocent(x) and Boeotian(x) -> Beaked(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) -> Nocent(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) and Beaked(x) -> Tattered(x))\nLoosened(benjamen) and Nocent(benjamen) -> Boeotian(benjamen)\n\nBeaked(benjamen)\n\nLoosened(benjamen) and forall x (Loosened(x) -> Nocent(x)) -> therefore Nocent(benjamen) Loosened(benjamen) and forall x (Loosened(x) -> Nocent(x)) -> therefore Nocent(benjamen) Loosened(benjamen) and Nocent(benjamen) and Loosened(benjamen) and Nocent(benjamen) -> Boeotian(benjamen) -> therefore Boeotian(benjamen) Nocent(benjamen) and Boeotian(benjamen) and forall x (Nocent(x) and Boeotian(x) -> Beaked(x)) -> therefore Beaked(benjamen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Wilone is symmetric. Kurtis is farfetched. Chandal is unhygienic. If Chandal is symmetric then Chandal is silky. If Wilone is magical then Wilone is farfetched. If someone is focused and marital then they are silky. Quiet people are focused. All symmetric, silky people are unhygienic. If Wilone is symmetric and Wilone is focused then Wilone is marital. Wilone is not silky.", "logic": "\nSymmetric(wilone)\nFarfetched(kurtis)\nUnhygienic(chandal)\nSymmetric(chandal) -> Silky(chandal)\nMagical(wilone) -> Farfetched(wilone)\nforall x (Focused(x) and Marital(x) -> Silky(x))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Focused(x))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and Silky(x) -> Unhygienic(x))\nSymmetric(wilone) and Focused(wilone) -> Marital(wilone)\n\nnot Silky(wilone)\n\nSymmetric(wilone) and forall x (Symmetric(x) -> Focused(x)) -> therefore Focused(wilone) Symmetric(wilone) and forall x (Symmetric(x) -> Focused(x)) -> therefore Focused(wilone) Symmetric(wilone) and Focused(wilone) and Symmetric(wilone) and Focused(wilone) -> Marital(wilone) -> therefore Marital(wilone) Focused(wilone) and Marital(wilone) and forall x (Focused(x) and Marital(x) -> Silky(x)) -> therefore Silky(wilone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Desirae is maniacal. Marjory is apheretic. Corrinne is feathery. If Corrinne is maniacal then Corrinne is fourscore. If Desirae is organized then Desirae is apheretic. If someone is taped and prodromic then they are fourscore. Quiet people are taped. All maniacal, fourscore people are feathery. If Desirae is maniacal and Desirae is taped then Desirae is prodromic. Marjory is not fourscore.", "logic": "\nManiacal(desirae)\nApheretic(marjory)\nFeathery(corrinne)\nManiacal(corrinne) -> Fourscore(corrinne)\nOrganized(desirae) -> Apheretic(desirae)\nforall x (Taped(x) and Prodromic(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Taped(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) and Fourscore(x) -> Feathery(x))\nManiacal(desirae) and Taped(desirae) -> Prodromic(desirae)\n\nnot Fourscore(marjory)\n\nforall x (Taped(x) and Prodromic(x) -> Fourscore(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Kevan is fleshly. Lidia is definitive. Phyllis is episcopal. If Phyllis is fleshly then Phyllis is hirsute. If Kevan is weathered then Kevan is definitive. If someone is matey and ariose then they are hirsute. Quiet people are matey. All fleshly, hirsute people are episcopal. If Kevan is fleshly and Kevan is matey then Kevan is ariose. Lidia is episcopal.", "logic": "\nFleshly(kevan)\nDefinitive(lidia)\nEpiscopal(phyllis)\nFleshly(phyllis) -> Hirsute(phyllis)\nWeathered(kevan) -> Definitive(kevan)\nforall x (Matey(x) and Ariose(x) -> Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) -> Matey(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) and Hirsute(x) -> Episcopal(x))\nFleshly(kevan) and Matey(kevan) -> Ariose(kevan)\n\nEpiscopal(lidia)\n\nforall x (Fleshly(x) and Hirsute(x) -> Episcopal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Klaus is loathly. Joshua is asynergic. Julita is uncoupled. If Julita is loathly then Julita is isolated. If Klaus is hominine then Klaus is asynergic. If someone is sedulous and lemonlike then they are isolated. Quiet people are sedulous. All loathly, isolated people are uncoupled. If Klaus is loathly and Klaus is sedulous then Klaus is lemonlike. Klaus is not asynergic.", "logic": "\nLoathly(klaus)\nAsynergic(joshua)\nUncoupled(julita)\nLoathly(julita) -> Isolated(julita)\nHominine(klaus) -> Asynergic(klaus)\nforall x (Sedulous(x) and Lemonlike(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Loathly(x) -> Sedulous(x))\nforall x (Loathly(x) and Isolated(x) -> Uncoupled(x))\nLoathly(klaus) and Sedulous(klaus) -> Lemonlike(klaus)\n\nnot Asynergic(klaus)\n\nHominine(klaus) -> Asynergic(klaus) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Nari is anodyne. Alphonso is arsenious. Ingemar is liver. If Ingemar is anodyne then Ingemar is flowerless. If Nari is unwitting then Nari is arsenious. If someone is spanish and protective then they are flowerless. Quiet people are spanish. All anodyne, flowerless people are liver. If Nari is anodyne and Nari is spanish then Nari is protective. Ingemar is flowerless.", "logic": "\nAnodyne(nari)\nArsenious(alphonso)\nLiver(ingemar)\nAnodyne(ingemar) -> Flowerless(ingemar)\nUnwitting(nari) -> Arsenious(nari)\nforall x (Spanish(x) and Protective(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Spanish(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) and Flowerless(x) -> Liver(x))\nAnodyne(nari) and Spanish(nari) -> Protective(nari)\n\nFlowerless(ingemar)\n\nAnodyne(ingemar) -> Flowerless(ingemar) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Daphene is adept. Oliy is sigmoidal. Jonell is valued. If Jonell is adept then Jonell is cosmetic. If Daphene is dioecious then Daphene is sigmoidal. If someone is whatsoever and leaved then they are cosmetic. Quiet people are whatsoever. All adept, cosmetic people are valued. If Daphene is adept and Daphene is whatsoever then Daphene is leaved. Jonell is not sigmoidal.", "logic": "\nAdept(daphene)\nSigmoidal(oliy)\nValued(jonell)\nAdept(jonell) -> Cosmetic(jonell)\nDioecious(daphene) -> Sigmoidal(daphene)\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) and Leaved(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Adept(x) -> Whatsoever(x))\nforall x (Adept(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> Valued(x))\nAdept(daphene) and Whatsoever(daphene) -> Leaved(daphene)\n\nnot Sigmoidal(jonell)\n\nnot Sigmoidal(jonell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Michell is resiny. Bryon is colonised. Sharia is steamy. If Sharia is resiny then Sharia is facetious. If Michell is parallel then Michell is colonised. If someone is treated and lacerated then they are facetious. Quiet people are treated. All resiny, facetious people are steamy. If Michell is resiny and Michell is treated then Michell is lacerated. Bryon is lacerated.", "logic": "\nResiny(michell)\nColonised(bryon)\nSteamy(sharia)\nResiny(sharia) -> Facetious(sharia)\nParallel(michell) -> Colonised(michell)\nforall x (Treated(x) and Lacerated(x) -> Facetious(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Treated(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) and Facetious(x) -> Steamy(x))\nResiny(michell) and Treated(michell) -> Lacerated(michell)\n\nLacerated(bryon)\n\nLacerated(bryon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Elberta is manly. Stefania is amerind. Llewellyn is malign. If Llewellyn is manly then Llewellyn is rumansh. If Elberta is abkhaz then Elberta is amerind. If someone is voluntary and stringent then they are rumansh. Quiet people are voluntary. All manly, rumansh people are malign. If Elberta is manly and Elberta is voluntary then Elberta is stringent. Llewellyn is not stringent.", "logic": "\nManly(elberta)\nAmerind(stefania)\nMalign(llewellyn)\nManly(llewellyn) -> Rumansh(llewellyn)\nAbkhaz(elberta) -> Amerind(elberta)\nforall x (Voluntary(x) and Stringent(x) -> Rumansh(x))\nforall x (Manly(x) -> Voluntary(x))\nforall x (Manly(x) and Rumansh(x) -> Malign(x))\nManly(elberta) and Voluntary(elberta) -> Stringent(elberta)\n\nnot Stringent(llewellyn)\n\nnot Stringent(llewellyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Ezekiel is taking. Isabelita is cheering. Michele is topmost. If Michele is taking then Michele is aramean. If Ezekiel is american then Ezekiel is cheering. If someone is bifacial and coseismal then they are aramean. Quiet people are bifacial. All taking, aramean people are topmost. If Ezekiel is taking and Ezekiel is bifacial then Ezekiel is coseismal. Isabelita is american.", "logic": "\nTaking(ezekiel)\nCheering(isabelita)\nTopmost(michele)\nTaking(michele) -> Aramean(michele)\nAmerican(ezekiel) -> Cheering(ezekiel)\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Coseismal(x) -> Aramean(x))\nforall x (Taking(x) -> Bifacial(x))\nforall x (Taking(x) and Aramean(x) -> Topmost(x))\nTaking(ezekiel) and Bifacial(ezekiel) -> Coseismal(ezekiel)\n\nAmerican(isabelita)\n\nAmerican(isabelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "The welby is tasselled. The welby vaunt the zane. The zane is nonextant. If someone is jarring and they see the welby then they visit the zane. If someone is nonextant and they see the welby then the welby is unloving. If someone vaunt the zane then the zane vaunt the welby. If someone is nonextant and they see the welby then the welby vaunt the zane. If someone vaunt the zane then they like the welby. If someone is jarring then they see the welby. If someone is tasselled then they like the welby. If someone is tasselled then they are jarring. The welby is tasselled.", "logic": "\nTasselled(welby)\nVaunt(welby, zane)\nNonextant(zane)\nforall x (Jarring(x) and Vaunt(x, welby) -> Read(x, zane))\nforall x (Nonextant(x) and Vaunt(x, welby) -> Unloving(welby))\nforall x (Vaunt(x, zane) -> Vaunt(zane, welby))\nforall x (Nonextant(x) and Vaunt(x, welby) -> Vaunt(welby, zane))\nforall x (Vaunt(x, zane) -> Bate(x, welby))\nforall x (Jarring(x) -> Vaunt(x, welby))\nforall x (Tasselled(x) -> Bate(x, welby))\nforall x (Tasselled(x) -> Jarring(x))\n\nTasselled(welby)\n\ntherefore Tasselled(welby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The alisha is rear. The alisha deforest the major. The major is toiling. If someone is truculent and they see the alisha then they visit the major. If someone is toiling and they see the alisha then the alisha is joyous. If someone deforest the major then the major deforest the alisha. If someone is toiling and they see the alisha then the alisha deforest the major. If someone deforest the major then they like the alisha. If someone is truculent then they see the alisha. If someone is rear then they like the alisha. If someone is rear then they are truculent. The alisha is not rear.", "logic": "\nRear(alisha)\nDeforest(alisha, major)\nToiling(major)\nforall x (Truculent(x) and Deforest(x, alisha) -> Hopple(x, major))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Deforest(x, alisha) -> Joyous(alisha))\nforall x (Deforest(x, major) -> Deforest(major, alisha))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Deforest(x, alisha) -> Deforest(alisha, major))\nforall x (Deforest(x, major) -> Pommel(x, alisha))\nforall x (Truculent(x) -> Deforest(x, alisha))\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Pommel(x, alisha))\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Truculent(x))\n\nnot Rear(alisha)\n\ntherefore Rear(alisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The mina is malcontent. The mina ovulate the giuseppe. The giuseppe is human. If someone is flammable and they see the mina then they visit the giuseppe. If someone is human and they see the mina then the mina is uncomplete. If someone ovulate the giuseppe then the giuseppe ovulate the mina. If someone is human and they see the mina then the mina ovulate the giuseppe. If someone ovulate the giuseppe then they like the mina. If someone is flammable then they see the mina. If someone is malcontent then they like the mina. If someone is malcontent then they are flammable. The mina is flammable.", "logic": "\nMalcontent(mina)\nOvulate(mina, giuseppe)\nHuman(giuseppe)\nforall x (Flammable(x) and Ovulate(x, mina) -> Oxygenate(x, giuseppe))\nforall x (Human(x) and Ovulate(x, mina) -> Uncomplete(mina))\nforall x (Ovulate(x, giuseppe) -> Ovulate(giuseppe, mina))\nforall x (Human(x) and Ovulate(x, mina) -> Ovulate(mina, giuseppe))\nforall x (Ovulate(x, giuseppe) -> Contrast(x, mina))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Ovulate(x, mina))\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Contrast(x, mina))\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Flammable(x))\n\nFlammable(mina)\n\nMalcontent(mina) and forall x (Malcontent(x) -> Flammable(x)) -> therefore Flammable(mina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The gianina is uneven. The gianina wrinkle the pascal. The pascal is pinchbeck. If someone is imbecilic and they see the gianina then they visit the pascal. If someone is pinchbeck and they see the gianina then the gianina is jamaican. If someone wrinkle the pascal then the pascal wrinkle the gianina. If someone is pinchbeck and they see the gianina then the gianina wrinkle the pascal. If someone wrinkle the pascal then they like the gianina. If someone is imbecilic then they see the gianina. If someone is uneven then they like the gianina. If someone is uneven then they are imbecilic. The pascal does not see the gianina.", "logic": "\nUneven(gianina)\nWrinkle(gianina, pascal)\nPinchbeck(pascal)\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) and Wrinkle(x, gianina) -> Misally(x, pascal))\nforall x (Pinchbeck(x) and Wrinkle(x, gianina) -> Jamaican(gianina))\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, pascal) -> Wrinkle(pascal, gianina))\nforall x (Pinchbeck(x) and Wrinkle(x, gianina) -> Wrinkle(gianina, pascal))\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, pascal) -> Dismay(x, gianina))\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) -> Wrinkle(x, gianina))\nforall x (Uneven(x) -> Dismay(x, gianina))\nforall x (Uneven(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\n\nnot Wrinkle(pascal, gianina)\n\nWrinkle(gianina, pascal) and forall x (Wrinkle(x, pascal) -> Wrinkle(pascal, gianina)) -> therefore Wrinkle(pascal, gianina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The corrianne is barren. The corrianne fertilize the ellissa. The ellissa is heliac. If someone is octal and they see the corrianne then they visit the ellissa. If someone is heliac and they see the corrianne then the corrianne is iodized. If someone fertilize the ellissa then the ellissa fertilize the corrianne. If someone is heliac and they see the corrianne then the corrianne fertilize the ellissa. If someone fertilize the ellissa then they like the corrianne. If someone is octal then they see the corrianne. If someone is barren then they like the corrianne. If someone is barren then they are octal. The corrianne is iodized.", "logic": "\nBarren(corrianne)\nFertilize(corrianne, ellissa)\nHeliac(ellissa)\nforall x (Octal(x) and Fertilize(x, corrianne) -> Rede(x, ellissa))\nforall x (Heliac(x) and Fertilize(x, corrianne) -> Iodized(corrianne))\nforall x (Fertilize(x, ellissa) -> Fertilize(ellissa, corrianne))\nforall x (Heliac(x) and Fertilize(x, corrianne) -> Fertilize(corrianne, ellissa))\nforall x (Fertilize(x, ellissa) -> Scud(x, corrianne))\nforall x (Octal(x) -> Fertilize(x, corrianne))\nforall x (Barren(x) -> Scud(x, corrianne))\nforall x (Barren(x) -> Octal(x))\n\nIodized(corrianne)\n\nFertilize(corrianne, ellissa) and forall x (Fertilize(x, ellissa) -> Fertilize(ellissa, corrianne)) -> therefore Fertilize(ellissa, corrianne) Heliac(ellissa) and Fertilize(ellissa, corrianne) and forall x (Heliac(x) and Fertilize(x, corrianne) -> Iodized(corrianne)) -> therefore Iodized(corrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The salman is national. The salman rasp the wilbur. The wilbur is dedicated. If someone is enchanted and they see the salman then they visit the wilbur. If someone is dedicated and they see the salman then the salman is neoliberal. If someone rasp the wilbur then the wilbur rasp the salman. If someone is dedicated and they see the salman then the salman rasp the wilbur. If someone rasp the wilbur then they like the salman. If someone is enchanted then they see the salman. If someone is national then they like the salman. If someone is national then they are enchanted. The salman is not neoliberal.", "logic": "\nNational(salman)\nRasp(salman, wilbur)\nDedicated(wilbur)\nforall x (Enchanted(x) and Rasp(x, salman) -> Clatter(x, wilbur))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and Rasp(x, salman) -> Neoliberal(salman))\nforall x (Rasp(x, wilbur) -> Rasp(wilbur, salman))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and Rasp(x, salman) -> Rasp(salman, wilbur))\nforall x (Rasp(x, wilbur) -> Teargas(x, salman))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Rasp(x, salman))\nforall x (National(x) -> Teargas(x, salman))\nforall x (National(x) -> Enchanted(x))\n\nnot Neoliberal(salman)\n\nRasp(salman, wilbur) and forall x (Rasp(x, wilbur) -> Rasp(wilbur, salman)) -> therefore Rasp(wilbur, salman) Dedicated(wilbur) and Rasp(wilbur, salman) and forall x (Dedicated(x) and Rasp(x, salman) -> Neoliberal(salman)) -> therefore Neoliberal(salman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The nicolette is light. The nicolette crush the darin. The darin is enolic. If someone is assertable and they see the nicolette then they visit the darin. If someone is enolic and they see the nicolette then the nicolette is proximo. If someone crush the darin then the darin crush the nicolette. If someone is enolic and they see the nicolette then the nicolette crush the darin. If someone crush the darin then they like the nicolette. If someone is assertable then they see the nicolette. If someone is light then they like the nicolette. If someone is light then they are assertable. The nicolette schematize the darin.", "logic": "\nLight(nicolette)\nCrush(nicolette, darin)\nEnolic(darin)\nforall x (Assertable(x) and Crush(x, nicolette) -> Schematize(x, darin))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Crush(x, nicolette) -> Proximo(nicolette))\nforall x (Crush(x, darin) -> Crush(darin, nicolette))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Crush(x, nicolette) -> Crush(nicolette, darin))\nforall x (Crush(x, darin) -> Clerk(x, nicolette))\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Crush(x, nicolette))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Clerk(x, nicolette))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Assertable(x))\n\nSchematize(nicolette, darin)\n\nLight(nicolette) and forall x (Light(x) -> Assertable(x)) -> therefore Assertable(nicolette) Light(nicolette) and forall x (Light(x) -> Assertable(x)) -> therefore Assertable(nicolette) Assertable(nicolette) and forall x (Assertable(x) -> Crush(x, nicolette)) -> therefore Crush(nicolette, nicolette) Assertable(nicolette) and Crush(nicolette, nicolette) and forall x (Assertable(x) and Crush(x, nicolette) -> Schematize(x, darin)) -> therefore Schematize(nicolette, darin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The jori is daily. The jori snick the appolonia. The appolonia is salient. If someone is dissoluble and they see the jori then they visit the appolonia. If someone is salient and they see the jori then the jori is vermicular. If someone snick the appolonia then the appolonia snick the jori. If someone is salient and they see the jori then the jori snick the appolonia. If someone snick the appolonia then they like the jori. If someone is dissoluble then they see the jori. If someone is daily then they like the jori. If someone is daily then they are dissoluble. The jori does not visit the appolonia.", "logic": "\nDaily(jori)\nSnick(jori, appolonia)\nSalient(appolonia)\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) and Snick(x, jori) -> Reference(x, appolonia))\nforall x (Salient(x) and Snick(x, jori) -> Vermicular(jori))\nforall x (Snick(x, appolonia) -> Snick(appolonia, jori))\nforall x (Salient(x) and Snick(x, jori) -> Snick(jori, appolonia))\nforall x (Snick(x, appolonia) -> Slaver(x, jori))\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) -> Snick(x, jori))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Slaver(x, jori))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\n\nnot Reference(jori, appolonia)\n\nDaily(jori) and forall x (Daily(x) -> Dissoluble(x)) -> therefore Dissoluble(jori) Daily(jori) and forall x (Daily(x) -> Dissoluble(x)) -> therefore Dissoluble(jori) Dissoluble(jori) and forall x (Dissoluble(x) -> Snick(x, jori)) -> therefore Snick(jori, jori) Dissoluble(jori) and Snick(jori, jori) and forall x (Dissoluble(x) and Snick(x, jori) -> Reference(x, appolonia)) -> therefore Reference(jori, appolonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The sibylla is sympatric. The sibylla ford the thadeus. The thadeus is true. If someone is deranged and they see the sibylla then they visit the thadeus. If someone is true and they see the sibylla then the sibylla is madcap. If someone ford the thadeus then the thadeus ford the sibylla. If someone is true and they see the sibylla then the sibylla ford the thadeus. If someone ford the thadeus then they like the sibylla. If someone is deranged then they see the sibylla. If someone is sympatric then they like the sibylla. If someone is sympatric then they are deranged. The thadeus does not visit the thadeus.", "logic": "\nSympatric(sibylla)\nFord(sibylla, thadeus)\nTrue(thadeus)\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Ford(x, sibylla) -> Fine(x, thadeus))\nforall x (True(x) and Ford(x, sibylla) -> Madcap(sibylla))\nforall x (Ford(x, thadeus) -> Ford(thadeus, sibylla))\nforall x (True(x) and Ford(x, sibylla) -> Ford(sibylla, thadeus))\nforall x (Ford(x, thadeus) -> Italicise(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Deranged(x) -> Ford(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Sympatric(x) -> Italicise(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Sympatric(x) -> Deranged(x))\n\nnot Fine(thadeus, thadeus)\n\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Ford(x, sibylla) -> Fine(x, thadeus)) <- forall x (Sympatric(x) -> Deranged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The ephrem is matched. The ephrem edge the tarra. The tarra is altricial. If someone is enduring and they see the ephrem then they visit the tarra. If someone is altricial and they see the ephrem then the ephrem is unhinged. If someone edge the tarra then the tarra edge the ephrem. If someone is altricial and they see the ephrem then the ephrem edge the tarra. If someone edge the tarra then they like the ephrem. If someone is enduring then they see the ephrem. If someone is matched then they like the ephrem. If someone is matched then they are enduring. The tarra deodorise the ephrem.", "logic": "\nMatched(ephrem)\nEdge(ephrem, tarra)\nAltricial(tarra)\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Edge(x, ephrem) -> Spoof(x, tarra))\nforall x (Altricial(x) and Edge(x, ephrem) -> Unhinged(ephrem))\nforall x (Edge(x, tarra) -> Edge(tarra, ephrem))\nforall x (Altricial(x) and Edge(x, ephrem) -> Edge(ephrem, tarra))\nforall x (Edge(x, tarra) -> Deodorise(x, ephrem))\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> Edge(x, ephrem))\nforall x (Matched(x) -> Deodorise(x, ephrem))\nforall x (Matched(x) -> Enduring(x))\n\nDeodorise(tarra, ephrem)\n\nforall x (Edge(x, tarra) -> Deodorise(x, ephrem)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The sylvan is frolicsome. The sylvan copyedit the norina. The norina is chunky. If someone is readable and they see the sylvan then they visit the norina. If someone is chunky and they see the sylvan then the sylvan is rotational. If someone copyedit the norina then the norina copyedit the sylvan. If someone is chunky and they see the sylvan then the sylvan copyedit the norina. If someone copyedit the norina then they like the sylvan. If someone is readable then they see the sylvan. If someone is frolicsome then they like the sylvan. If someone is frolicsome then they are readable. The norina is not readable.", "logic": "\nFrolicsome(sylvan)\nCopyedit(sylvan, norina)\nChunky(norina)\nforall x (Readable(x) and Copyedit(x, sylvan) -> Lime(x, norina))\nforall x (Chunky(x) and Copyedit(x, sylvan) -> Rotational(sylvan))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, norina) -> Copyedit(norina, sylvan))\nforall x (Chunky(x) and Copyedit(x, sylvan) -> Copyedit(sylvan, norina))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, norina) -> Hoot(x, sylvan))\nforall x (Readable(x) -> Copyedit(x, sylvan))\nforall x (Frolicsome(x) -> Hoot(x, sylvan))\nforall x (Frolicsome(x) -> Readable(x))\n\nnot Readable(norina)\n\nforall x (Frolicsome(x) -> Readable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The may is tied. The may rarify the carree. The carree is blunt. If someone is unromantic and they see the may then they visit the carree. If someone is blunt and they see the may then the may is soporific. If someone rarify the carree then the carree rarify the may. If someone is blunt and they see the may then the may rarify the carree. If someone rarify the carree then they like the may. If someone is unromantic then they see the may. If someone is tied then they like the may. If someone is tied then they are unromantic. The carree is soporific.", "logic": "\nTied(may)\nRarify(may, carree)\nBlunt(carree)\nforall x (Unromantic(x) and Rarify(x, may) -> Lobby(x, carree))\nforall x (Blunt(x) and Rarify(x, may) -> Soporific(may))\nforall x (Rarify(x, carree) -> Rarify(carree, may))\nforall x (Blunt(x) and Rarify(x, may) -> Rarify(may, carree))\nforall x (Rarify(x, carree) -> Mudwrestle(x, may))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Rarify(x, may))\nforall x (Tied(x) -> Mudwrestle(x, may))\nforall x (Tied(x) -> Unromantic(x))\n\nSoporific(carree)\n\nSoporific(carree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The april is poised. The april support the lanna. The lanna is mangled. If someone is wizardly and they see the april then they visit the lanna. If someone is mangled and they see the april then the april is articulate. If someone support the lanna then the lanna support the april. If someone is mangled and they see the april then the april support the lanna. If someone support the lanna then they like the april. If someone is wizardly then they see the april. If someone is poised then they like the april. If someone is poised then they are wizardly. The lanna does not see the lanna.", "logic": "\nPoised(april)\nSupport(april, lanna)\nMangled(lanna)\nforall x (Wizardly(x) and Support(x, april) -> Volley(x, lanna))\nforall x (Mangled(x) and Support(x, april) -> Articulate(april))\nforall x (Support(x, lanna) -> Support(lanna, april))\nforall x (Mangled(x) and Support(x, april) -> Support(april, lanna))\nforall x (Support(x, lanna) -> Siphon(x, april))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Support(x, april))\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Siphon(x, april))\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Wizardly(x))\n\nnot Support(lanna, lanna)\n\nnot Support(lanna, lanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The carlye is sagittate. The carlye penalize the marcel. The marcel is skeptical. If someone is senatorial and they see the carlye then they visit the marcel. If someone is skeptical and they see the carlye then the carlye is unheaded. If someone penalize the marcel then the marcel penalize the carlye. If someone is skeptical and they see the carlye then the carlye penalize the marcel. If someone penalize the marcel then they like the carlye. If someone is senatorial then they see the carlye. If someone is sagittate then they like the carlye. If someone is sagittate then they are senatorial. The carlye is rough.", "logic": "\nSagittate(carlye)\nPenalize(carlye, marcel)\nSkeptical(marcel)\nforall x (Senatorial(x) and Penalize(x, carlye) -> Sterilise(x, marcel))\nforall x (Skeptical(x) and Penalize(x, carlye) -> Unheaded(carlye))\nforall x (Penalize(x, marcel) -> Penalize(marcel, carlye))\nforall x (Skeptical(x) and Penalize(x, carlye) -> Penalize(carlye, marcel))\nforall x (Penalize(x, marcel) -> Mention(x, carlye))\nforall x (Senatorial(x) -> Penalize(x, carlye))\nforall x (Sagittate(x) -> Mention(x, carlye))\nforall x (Sagittate(x) -> Senatorial(x))\n\nRough(carlye)\n\nRough(carlye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The norine is philippine. The norine shudder the lynn. The lynn is coherent. If someone is immunized and they see the norine then they visit the lynn. If someone is coherent and they see the norine then the norine is passant. If someone shudder the lynn then the lynn shudder the norine. If someone is coherent and they see the norine then the norine shudder the lynn. If someone shudder the lynn then they like the norine. If someone is immunized then they see the norine. If someone is philippine then they like the norine. If someone is philippine then they are immunized. The norine does not like the lynn.", "logic": "\nPhilippine(norine)\nShudder(norine, lynn)\nCoherent(lynn)\nforall x (Immunized(x) and Shudder(x, norine) -> Gripe(x, lynn))\nforall x (Coherent(x) and Shudder(x, norine) -> Passant(norine))\nforall x (Shudder(x, lynn) -> Shudder(lynn, norine))\nforall x (Coherent(x) and Shudder(x, norine) -> Shudder(norine, lynn))\nforall x (Shudder(x, lynn) -> Hearken(x, norine))\nforall x (Immunized(x) -> Shudder(x, norine))\nforall x (Philippine(x) -> Hearken(x, norine))\nforall x (Philippine(x) -> Immunized(x))\n\nnot Hearken(norine, lynn)\n\nnot Hearken(norine, lynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The kathye is fluky. The kathye canulate the marthe. The marthe is malign. If someone is ransomed and they see the kathye then they visit the marthe. If someone is malign and they see the kathye then the kathye is tubeless. If someone canulate the marthe then the marthe canulate the kathye. If someone is malign and they see the kathye then the kathye canulate the marthe. If someone canulate the marthe then they like the kathye. If someone is ransomed then they see the kathye. If someone is fluky then they like the kathye. If someone is fluky then they are ransomed. The kathye is malign.", "logic": "\nFluky(kathye)\nCanulate(kathye, marthe)\nMalign(marthe)\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Canulate(x, kathye) -> Hazard(x, marthe))\nforall x (Malign(x) and Canulate(x, kathye) -> Tubeless(kathye))\nforall x (Canulate(x, marthe) -> Canulate(marthe, kathye))\nforall x (Malign(x) and Canulate(x, kathye) -> Canulate(kathye, marthe))\nforall x (Canulate(x, marthe) -> Inmarry(x, kathye))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) -> Canulate(x, kathye))\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Inmarry(x, kathye))\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Ransomed(x))\n\nMalign(kathye)\n\nMalign(kathye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The nathalia is unrimed. The nathalia is wonted. The nathalia repaint the ferd. The ferd plastinate the sonny. The dolora is unrimed. The dolora overbear the sonny. The sonny is unrimed. If someone is knackered then they visit the nathalia. If someone plastinate the sonny then they are wonted. If someone plastinate the nathalia then the nathalia repaint the sonny. If the sonny is scandalous and the sonny repaint the ferd then the ferd plastinate the dolora. If the ferd is knackered then the ferd plastinate the dolora. If someone is wonted then they are unrimed. If the ferd overbear the dolora and the ferd plastinate the nathalia then the dolora overbear the sonny. If the ferd is unrimed then the ferd repaint the nathalia. The dolora overbear the sonny.", "logic": "\nUnrimed(nathalia)\nWonted(nathalia)\nRepaint(nathalia, ferd)\nPlastinate(ferd, sonny)\nUnrimed(dolora)\nOverbear(dolora, sonny)\nUnrimed(sonny)\nforall x (Knackered(x) -> Repaint(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Plastinate(x, sonny) -> Wonted(x))\nforall x (Plastinate(x, nathalia) -> Repaint(nathalia, sonny))\nScandalous(sonny) and Repaint(sonny, ferd) -> Plastinate(ferd, dolora)\nKnackered(ferd) -> Plastinate(ferd, dolora)\nforall x (Wonted(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nOverbear(ferd, dolora) and Plastinate(ferd, nathalia) -> Overbear(dolora, sonny)\nUnrimed(ferd) -> Repaint(ferd, nathalia)\n\nOverbear(dolora, sonny)\n\ntherefore Overbear(dolora, sonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The allyn is blameful. The allyn is electoral. The allyn churn the merrily. The merrily plough the rudy. The waine is blameful. The waine beep the rudy. The rudy is blameful. If someone is lipless then they visit the allyn. If someone plough the rudy then they are electoral. If someone plough the allyn then the allyn churn the rudy. If the rudy is graceful and the rudy churn the merrily then the merrily plough the waine. If the merrily is lipless then the merrily plough the waine. If someone is electoral then they are blameful. If the merrily beep the waine and the merrily plough the allyn then the waine beep the rudy. If the merrily is blameful then the merrily churn the allyn. The waine does not see the rudy.", "logic": "\nBlameful(allyn)\nElectoral(allyn)\nChurn(allyn, merrily)\nPlough(merrily, rudy)\nBlameful(waine)\nBeep(waine, rudy)\nBlameful(rudy)\nforall x (Lipless(x) -> Churn(x, allyn))\nforall x (Plough(x, rudy) -> Electoral(x))\nforall x (Plough(x, allyn) -> Churn(allyn, rudy))\nGraceful(rudy) and Churn(rudy, merrily) -> Plough(merrily, waine)\nLipless(merrily) -> Plough(merrily, waine)\nforall x (Electoral(x) -> Blameful(x))\nBeep(merrily, waine) and Plough(merrily, allyn) -> Beep(waine, rudy)\nBlameful(merrily) -> Churn(merrily, allyn)\n\nnot Beep(waine, rudy)\n\ntherefore Beep(waine, rudy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The giraldo is edental. The giraldo is nary. The giraldo recover the zed. The zed quintuple the reggy. The karlen is edental. The karlen stun the reggy. The reggy is edental. If someone is stainless then they visit the giraldo. If someone quintuple the reggy then they are nary. If someone quintuple the giraldo then the giraldo recover the reggy. If the reggy is modifiable and the reggy recover the zed then the zed quintuple the karlen. If the zed is stainless then the zed quintuple the karlen. If someone is nary then they are edental. If the zed stun the karlen and the zed quintuple the giraldo then the karlen stun the reggy. If the zed is edental then the zed recover the giraldo. The zed is nary.", "logic": "\nEdental(giraldo)\nNary(giraldo)\nRecover(giraldo, zed)\nQuintuple(zed, reggy)\nEdental(karlen)\nStun(karlen, reggy)\nEdental(reggy)\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Recover(x, giraldo))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, reggy) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, giraldo) -> Recover(giraldo, reggy))\nModifiable(reggy) and Recover(reggy, zed) -> Quintuple(zed, karlen)\nStainless(zed) -> Quintuple(zed, karlen)\nforall x (Nary(x) -> Edental(x))\nStun(zed, karlen) and Quintuple(zed, giraldo) -> Stun(karlen, reggy)\nEdental(zed) -> Recover(zed, giraldo)\n\nNary(zed)\n\nQuintuple(zed, reggy) and forall x (Quintuple(x, reggy) -> Nary(x)) -> therefore Nary(zed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The pippa is incurvate. The pippa is steady. The pippa eventuate the remington. The remington sheer the verna. The ermina is incurvate. The ermina fidget the verna. The verna is incurvate. If someone is jamesian then they visit the pippa. If someone sheer the verna then they are steady. If someone sheer the pippa then the pippa eventuate the verna. If the verna is signed and the verna eventuate the remington then the remington sheer the ermina. If the remington is jamesian then the remington sheer the ermina. If someone is steady then they are incurvate. If the remington fidget the ermina and the remington sheer the pippa then the ermina fidget the verna. If the remington is incurvate then the remington eventuate the pippa. The remington is not steady.", "logic": "\nIncurvate(pippa)\nSteady(pippa)\nEventuate(pippa, remington)\nSheer(remington, verna)\nIncurvate(ermina)\nFidget(ermina, verna)\nIncurvate(verna)\nforall x (Jamesian(x) -> Eventuate(x, pippa))\nforall x (Sheer(x, verna) -> Steady(x))\nforall x (Sheer(x, pippa) -> Eventuate(pippa, verna))\nSigned(verna) and Eventuate(verna, remington) -> Sheer(remington, ermina)\nJamesian(remington) -> Sheer(remington, ermina)\nforall x (Steady(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nFidget(remington, ermina) and Sheer(remington, pippa) -> Fidget(ermina, verna)\nIncurvate(remington) -> Eventuate(remington, pippa)\n\nnot Steady(remington)\n\nSheer(remington, verna) and forall x (Sheer(x, verna) -> Steady(x)) -> therefore Steady(remington)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The helyn is sinning. The helyn is impressed. The helyn rampage the rhonda. The rhonda horrify the clair. The franni is sinning. The franni tell the clair. The clair is sinning. If someone is recondite then they visit the helyn. If someone horrify the clair then they are impressed. If someone horrify the helyn then the helyn rampage the clair. If the clair is odorless and the clair rampage the rhonda then the rhonda horrify the franni. If the rhonda is recondite then the rhonda horrify the franni. If someone is impressed then they are sinning. If the rhonda tell the franni and the rhonda horrify the helyn then the franni tell the clair. If the rhonda is sinning then the rhonda rampage the helyn. The rhonda is sinning.", "logic": "\nSinning(helyn)\nImpressed(helyn)\nRampage(helyn, rhonda)\nHorrify(rhonda, clair)\nSinning(franni)\nTell(franni, clair)\nSinning(clair)\nforall x (Recondite(x) -> Rampage(x, helyn))\nforall x (Horrify(x, clair) -> Impressed(x))\nforall x (Horrify(x, helyn) -> Rampage(helyn, clair))\nOdorless(clair) and Rampage(clair, rhonda) -> Horrify(rhonda, franni)\nRecondite(rhonda) -> Horrify(rhonda, franni)\nforall x (Impressed(x) -> Sinning(x))\nTell(rhonda, franni) and Horrify(rhonda, helyn) -> Tell(franni, clair)\nSinning(rhonda) -> Rampage(rhonda, helyn)\n\nSinning(rhonda)\n\nHorrify(rhonda, clair) and forall x (Horrify(x, clair) -> Impressed(x)) -> therefore Impressed(rhonda) Impressed(rhonda) and forall x (Impressed(x) -> Sinning(x)) -> therefore Sinning(rhonda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The candice is chief. The candice is placatory. The candice trumpet the waite. The waite eddy the lolita. The catie is chief. The catie disarm the lolita. The lolita is chief. If someone is extralegal then they visit the candice. If someone eddy the lolita then they are placatory. If someone eddy the candice then the candice trumpet the lolita. If the lolita is reverend and the lolita trumpet the waite then the waite eddy the catie. If the waite is extralegal then the waite eddy the catie. If someone is placatory then they are chief. If the waite disarm the catie and the waite eddy the candice then the catie disarm the lolita. If the waite is chief then the waite trumpet the candice. The waite is not chief.", "logic": "\nChief(candice)\nPlacatory(candice)\nTrumpet(candice, waite)\nEddy(waite, lolita)\nChief(catie)\nDisarm(catie, lolita)\nChief(lolita)\nforall x (Extralegal(x) -> Trumpet(x, candice))\nforall x (Eddy(x, lolita) -> Placatory(x))\nforall x (Eddy(x, candice) -> Trumpet(candice, lolita))\nReverend(lolita) and Trumpet(lolita, waite) -> Eddy(waite, catie)\nExtralegal(waite) -> Eddy(waite, catie)\nforall x (Placatory(x) -> Chief(x))\nDisarm(waite, catie) and Eddy(waite, candice) -> Disarm(catie, lolita)\nChief(waite) -> Trumpet(waite, candice)\n\nnot Chief(waite)\n\nEddy(waite, lolita) and forall x (Eddy(x, lolita) -> Placatory(x)) -> therefore Placatory(waite) Placatory(waite) and forall x (Placatory(x) -> Chief(x)) -> therefore Chief(waite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The mikael is fragile. The mikael is multiphase. The mikael ditto the heinz. The heinz triplicate the cal. The catha is fragile. The catha conceive the cal. The cal is fragile. If someone is fruiting then they visit the mikael. If someone triplicate the cal then they are multiphase. If someone triplicate the mikael then the mikael ditto the cal. If the cal is chainlike and the cal ditto the heinz then the heinz triplicate the catha. If the heinz is fruiting then the heinz triplicate the catha. If someone is multiphase then they are fragile. If the heinz conceive the catha and the heinz triplicate the mikael then the catha conceive the cal. If the heinz is fragile then the heinz ditto the mikael. The heinz ditto the mikael.", "logic": "\nFragile(mikael)\nMultiphase(mikael)\nDitto(mikael, heinz)\nTriplicate(heinz, cal)\nFragile(catha)\nConceive(catha, cal)\nFragile(cal)\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> Ditto(x, mikael))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, cal) -> Multiphase(x))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, mikael) -> Ditto(mikael, cal))\nChainlike(cal) and Ditto(cal, heinz) -> Triplicate(heinz, catha)\nFruiting(heinz) -> Triplicate(heinz, catha)\nforall x (Multiphase(x) -> Fragile(x))\nConceive(heinz, catha) and Triplicate(heinz, mikael) -> Conceive(catha, cal)\nFragile(heinz) -> Ditto(heinz, mikael)\n\nDitto(heinz, mikael)\n\nTriplicate(heinz, cal) and forall x (Triplicate(x, cal) -> Multiphase(x)) -> therefore Multiphase(heinz) Multiphase(heinz) and forall x (Multiphase(x) -> Fragile(x)) -> therefore Fragile(heinz) Fragile(heinz) and Fragile(heinz) -> Ditto(heinz, mikael) -> therefore Ditto(heinz, mikael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The tarah is hemophilic. The tarah is anachronic. The tarah white the ximenez. The ximenez peal the luci. The kalvin is hemophilic. The kalvin daydream the luci. The luci is hemophilic. If someone is modifiable then they visit the tarah. If someone peal the luci then they are anachronic. If someone peal the tarah then the tarah white the luci. If the luci is canonic and the luci white the ximenez then the ximenez peal the kalvin. If the ximenez is modifiable then the ximenez peal the kalvin. If someone is anachronic then they are hemophilic. If the ximenez daydream the kalvin and the ximenez peal the tarah then the kalvin daydream the luci. If the ximenez is hemophilic then the ximenez white the tarah. The ximenez does not visit the tarah.", "logic": "\nHemophilic(tarah)\nAnachronic(tarah)\nWhite(tarah, ximenez)\nPeal(ximenez, luci)\nHemophilic(kalvin)\nDaydream(kalvin, luci)\nHemophilic(luci)\nforall x (Modifiable(x) -> White(x, tarah))\nforall x (Peal(x, luci) -> Anachronic(x))\nforall x (Peal(x, tarah) -> White(tarah, luci))\nCanonic(luci) and White(luci, ximenez) -> Peal(ximenez, kalvin)\nModifiable(ximenez) -> Peal(ximenez, kalvin)\nforall x (Anachronic(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nDaydream(ximenez, kalvin) and Peal(ximenez, tarah) -> Daydream(kalvin, luci)\nHemophilic(ximenez) -> White(ximenez, tarah)\n\nnot White(ximenez, tarah)\n\nPeal(ximenez, luci) and forall x (Peal(x, luci) -> Anachronic(x)) -> therefore Anachronic(ximenez) Anachronic(ximenez) and forall x (Anachronic(x) -> Hemophilic(x)) -> therefore Hemophilic(ximenez) Hemophilic(ximenez) and Hemophilic(ximenez) -> White(ximenez, tarah) -> therefore White(ximenez, tarah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The irma is seething. The irma is phenomenal. The irma outmode the moore. The moore thermostat the leighton. The ernestine is seething. The ernestine disdain the leighton. The leighton is seething. If someone is cadaverous then they visit the irma. If someone thermostat the leighton then they are phenomenal. If someone thermostat the irma then the irma outmode the leighton. If the leighton is monkish and the leighton outmode the moore then the moore thermostat the ernestine. If the moore is cadaverous then the moore thermostat the ernestine. If someone is phenomenal then they are seething. If the moore disdain the ernestine and the moore thermostat the irma then the ernestine disdain the leighton. If the moore is seething then the moore outmode the irma. The ernestine is not phenomenal.", "logic": "\nSeething(irma)\nPhenomenal(irma)\nOutmode(irma, moore)\nThermostat(moore, leighton)\nSeething(ernestine)\nDisdain(ernestine, leighton)\nSeething(leighton)\nforall x (Cadaverous(x) -> Outmode(x, irma))\nforall x (Thermostat(x, leighton) -> Phenomenal(x))\nforall x (Thermostat(x, irma) -> Outmode(irma, leighton))\nMonkish(leighton) and Outmode(leighton, moore) -> Thermostat(moore, ernestine)\nCadaverous(moore) -> Thermostat(moore, ernestine)\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Seething(x))\nDisdain(moore, ernestine) and Thermostat(moore, irma) -> Disdain(ernestine, leighton)\nSeething(moore) -> Outmode(moore, irma)\n\nnot Phenomenal(ernestine)\n\nforall x (Thermostat(x, leighton) -> Phenomenal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The collins is numerous. The collins is centesimal. The collins underpay the aila. The aila view the mead. The jeramie is numerous. The jeramie pipe the mead. The mead is numerous. If someone is chancy then they visit the collins. If someone view the mead then they are centesimal. If someone view the collins then the collins underpay the mead. If the mead is ridged and the mead underpay the aila then the aila view the jeramie. If the aila is chancy then the aila view the jeramie. If someone is centesimal then they are numerous. If the aila pipe the jeramie and the aila view the collins then the jeramie pipe the mead. If the aila is numerous then the aila underpay the collins. The collins underpay the collins.", "logic": "\nNumerous(collins)\nCentesimal(collins)\nUnderpay(collins, aila)\nView(aila, mead)\nNumerous(jeramie)\nPipe(jeramie, mead)\nNumerous(mead)\nforall x (Chancy(x) -> Underpay(x, collins))\nforall x (View(x, mead) -> Centesimal(x))\nforall x (View(x, collins) -> Underpay(collins, mead))\nRidged(mead) and Underpay(mead, aila) -> View(aila, jeramie)\nChancy(aila) -> View(aila, jeramie)\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> Numerous(x))\nPipe(aila, jeramie) and View(aila, collins) -> Pipe(jeramie, mead)\nNumerous(aila) -> Underpay(aila, collins)\n\nUnderpay(collins, collins)\n\nforall x (Chancy(x) -> Underpay(x, collins)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The seline is swagger. The seline is moresque. The seline occult the porter. The porter signalize the zackariah. The vin is swagger. The vin reassign the zackariah. The zackariah is swagger. If someone is cheap then they visit the seline. If someone signalize the zackariah then they are moresque. If someone signalize the seline then the seline occult the zackariah. If the zackariah is iodinated and the zackariah occult the porter then the porter signalize the vin. If the porter is cheap then the porter signalize the vin. If someone is moresque then they are swagger. If the porter reassign the vin and the porter signalize the seline then the vin reassign the zackariah. If the porter is swagger then the porter occult the seline. The zackariah is not moresque.", "logic": "\nSwagger(seline)\nMoresque(seline)\nOccult(seline, porter)\nSignalize(porter, zackariah)\nSwagger(vin)\nReassign(vin, zackariah)\nSwagger(zackariah)\nforall x (Cheap(x) -> Occult(x, seline))\nforall x (Signalize(x, zackariah) -> Moresque(x))\nforall x (Signalize(x, seline) -> Occult(seline, zackariah))\nIodinated(zackariah) and Occult(zackariah, porter) -> Signalize(porter, vin)\nCheap(porter) -> Signalize(porter, vin)\nforall x (Moresque(x) -> Swagger(x))\nReassign(porter, vin) and Signalize(porter, seline) -> Reassign(vin, zackariah)\nSwagger(porter) -> Occult(porter, seline)\n\nnot Moresque(zackariah)\n\nforall x (Signalize(x, zackariah) -> Moresque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The hermann is plumelike. The hermann is calycinal. The hermann forestall the augusta. The augusta encrust the bambi. The ardenia is plumelike. The ardenia remediate the bambi. The bambi is plumelike. If someone is purposive then they visit the hermann. If someone encrust the bambi then they are calycinal. If someone encrust the hermann then the hermann forestall the bambi. If the bambi is booted and the bambi forestall the augusta then the augusta encrust the ardenia. If the augusta is purposive then the augusta encrust the ardenia. If someone is calycinal then they are plumelike. If the augusta remediate the ardenia and the augusta encrust the hermann then the ardenia remediate the bambi. If the augusta is plumelike then the augusta forestall the hermann. The bambi forestall the hermann.", "logic": "\nPlumelike(hermann)\nCalycinal(hermann)\nForestall(hermann, augusta)\nEncrust(augusta, bambi)\nPlumelike(ardenia)\nRemediate(ardenia, bambi)\nPlumelike(bambi)\nforall x (Purposive(x) -> Forestall(x, hermann))\nforall x (Encrust(x, bambi) -> Calycinal(x))\nforall x (Encrust(x, hermann) -> Forestall(hermann, bambi))\nBooted(bambi) and Forestall(bambi, augusta) -> Encrust(augusta, ardenia)\nPurposive(augusta) -> Encrust(augusta, ardenia)\nforall x (Calycinal(x) -> Plumelike(x))\nRemediate(augusta, ardenia) and Encrust(augusta, hermann) -> Remediate(ardenia, bambi)\nPlumelike(augusta) -> Forestall(augusta, hermann)\n\nForestall(bambi, hermann)\n\nforall x (Purposive(x) -> Forestall(x, hermann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The desaree is apodictic. The desaree is ukrainian. The desaree simplify the giacomo. The giacomo detrain the sven. The andri is apodictic. The andri reorder the sven. The sven is apodictic. If someone is agelong then they visit the desaree. If someone detrain the sven then they are ukrainian. If someone detrain the desaree then the desaree simplify the sven. If the sven is economical and the sven simplify the giacomo then the giacomo detrain the andri. If the giacomo is agelong then the giacomo detrain the andri. If someone is ukrainian then they are apodictic. If the giacomo reorder the andri and the giacomo detrain the desaree then the andri reorder the sven. If the giacomo is apodictic then the giacomo simplify the desaree. The sven is not green.", "logic": "\nApodictic(desaree)\nUkrainian(desaree)\nSimplify(desaree, giacomo)\nDetrain(giacomo, sven)\nApodictic(andri)\nReorder(andri, sven)\nApodictic(sven)\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Simplify(x, desaree))\nforall x (Detrain(x, sven) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Detrain(x, desaree) -> Simplify(desaree, sven))\nEconomical(sven) and Simplify(sven, giacomo) -> Detrain(giacomo, andri)\nAgelong(giacomo) -> Detrain(giacomo, andri)\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Apodictic(x))\nReorder(giacomo, andri) and Detrain(giacomo, desaree) -> Reorder(andri, sven)\nApodictic(giacomo) -> Simplify(giacomo, desaree)\n\nnot Green(sven)\n\nnot Green(sven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The joane is unpaid. The joane is shameful. The joane await the tibold. The tibold rehear the linnea. The jeremias is unpaid. The jeremias extend the linnea. The linnea is unpaid. If someone is olivelike then they visit the joane. If someone rehear the linnea then they are shameful. If someone rehear the joane then the joane await the linnea. If the linnea is eurafrican and the linnea await the tibold then the tibold rehear the jeremias. If the tibold is olivelike then the tibold rehear the jeremias. If someone is shameful then they are unpaid. If the tibold extend the jeremias and the tibold rehear the joane then the jeremias extend the linnea. If the tibold is unpaid then the tibold await the joane. The joane rehear the jeremias.", "logic": "\nUnpaid(joane)\nShameful(joane)\nAwait(joane, tibold)\nRehear(tibold, linnea)\nUnpaid(jeremias)\nExtend(jeremias, linnea)\nUnpaid(linnea)\nforall x (Olivelike(x) -> Await(x, joane))\nforall x (Rehear(x, linnea) -> Shameful(x))\nforall x (Rehear(x, joane) -> Await(joane, linnea))\nEurafrican(linnea) and Await(linnea, tibold) -> Rehear(tibold, jeremias)\nOlivelike(tibold) -> Rehear(tibold, jeremias)\nforall x (Shameful(x) -> Unpaid(x))\nExtend(tibold, jeremias) and Rehear(tibold, joane) -> Extend(jeremias, linnea)\nUnpaid(tibold) -> Await(tibold, joane)\n\nRehear(joane, jeremias)\n\nRehear(joane, jeremias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The ralina is panicky. The ralina is slothful. The ralina dogmatize the florice. The florice stonewall the lizbeth. The charlott is panicky. The charlott fuel the lizbeth. The lizbeth is panicky. If someone is primed then they visit the ralina. If someone stonewall the lizbeth then they are slothful. If someone stonewall the ralina then the ralina dogmatize the lizbeth. If the lizbeth is piscine and the lizbeth dogmatize the florice then the florice stonewall the charlott. If the florice is primed then the florice stonewall the charlott. If someone is slothful then they are panicky. If the florice fuel the charlott and the florice stonewall the ralina then the charlott fuel the lizbeth. If the florice is panicky then the florice dogmatize the ralina. The lizbeth does not visit the charlott.", "logic": "\nPanicky(ralina)\nSlothful(ralina)\nDogmatize(ralina, florice)\nStonewall(florice, lizbeth)\nPanicky(charlott)\nFuel(charlott, lizbeth)\nPanicky(lizbeth)\nforall x (Primed(x) -> Dogmatize(x, ralina))\nforall x (Stonewall(x, lizbeth) -> Slothful(x))\nforall x (Stonewall(x, ralina) -> Dogmatize(ralina, lizbeth))\nPiscine(lizbeth) and Dogmatize(lizbeth, florice) -> Stonewall(florice, charlott)\nPrimed(florice) -> Stonewall(florice, charlott)\nforall x (Slothful(x) -> Panicky(x))\nFuel(florice, charlott) and Stonewall(florice, ralina) -> Fuel(charlott, lizbeth)\nPanicky(florice) -> Dogmatize(florice, ralina)\n\nnot Dogmatize(lizbeth, charlott)\n\nnot Dogmatize(lizbeth, charlott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The kelcy is beta. The kelcy is slipping. The kelcy ream the chrissy. The chrissy beat the johan. The roberta is beta. The roberta fritter the johan. The johan is beta. If someone is cagy then they visit the kelcy. If someone beat the johan then they are slipping. If someone beat the kelcy then the kelcy ream the johan. If the johan is calamitous and the johan ream the chrissy then the chrissy beat the roberta. If the chrissy is cagy then the chrissy beat the roberta. If someone is slipping then they are beta. If the chrissy fritter the roberta and the chrissy beat the kelcy then the roberta fritter the johan. If the chrissy is beta then the chrissy ream the kelcy. The roberta is green.", "logic": "\nBeta(kelcy)\nSlipping(kelcy)\nReam(kelcy, chrissy)\nBeat(chrissy, johan)\nBeta(roberta)\nFritter(roberta, johan)\nBeta(johan)\nforall x (Cagy(x) -> Ream(x, kelcy))\nforall x (Beat(x, johan) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Beat(x, kelcy) -> Ream(kelcy, johan))\nCalamitous(johan) and Ream(johan, chrissy) -> Beat(chrissy, roberta)\nCagy(chrissy) -> Beat(chrissy, roberta)\nforall x (Slipping(x) -> Beta(x))\nFritter(chrissy, roberta) and Beat(chrissy, kelcy) -> Fritter(roberta, johan)\nBeta(chrissy) -> Ream(chrissy, kelcy)\n\nGreen(roberta)\n\nGreen(roberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "Amalle is flattering. Amalle is lucent. Udale is lucent. If something is lucent then it is allophonic. All lucent things are divisional. Rough things are flattering. If Udale is archaic then Udale is divisional. Cold, lucent things are archaic. All divisional, archaic things are relentless. Amalle is lucent.", "logic": "\nFlattering(amalle)\nLucent(amalle)\nLucent(udale)\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Allophonic(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Divisional(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Flattering(x))\nArchaic(udale) -> Divisional(udale)\nforall x (Allophonic(x) and Lucent(x) -> Archaic(x))\nforall x (Divisional(x) and Archaic(x) -> Relentless(x))\n\nLucent(amalle)\n\ntherefore Lucent(amalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Tomasina is waggish. Tomasina is generic. Valerye is generic. If something is generic then it is monocarpic. All generic things are furious. Rough things are waggish. If Valerye is svelte then Valerye is furious. Cold, generic things are svelte. All furious, svelte things are spermatic. Tomasina is not generic.", "logic": "\nWaggish(tomasina)\nGeneric(tomasina)\nGeneric(valerye)\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Monocarpic(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Furious(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Waggish(x))\nSvelte(valerye) -> Furious(valerye)\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) and Generic(x) -> Svelte(x))\nforall x (Furious(x) and Svelte(x) -> Spermatic(x))\n\nnot Generic(tomasina)\n\ntherefore Generic(tomasina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Ira is surefooted. Ira is moire. Griff is moire. If something is moire then it is northward. All moire things are faint. Rough things are surefooted. If Griff is ranging then Griff is faint. Cold, moire things are ranging. All faint, ranging things are copular. Griff is faint.", "logic": "\nSurefooted(ira)\nMoire(ira)\nMoire(griff)\nforall x (Moire(x) -> Northward(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) -> Faint(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) -> Surefooted(x))\nRanging(griff) -> Faint(griff)\nforall x (Northward(x) and Moire(x) -> Ranging(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and Ranging(x) -> Copular(x))\n\nFaint(griff)\n\nMoire(griff) and forall x (Moire(x) -> Faint(x)) -> therefore Faint(griff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Chaddie is chiasmatic. Chaddie is advanced. Christen is advanced. If something is advanced then it is alabaster. All advanced things are undoable. Rough things are chiasmatic. If Christen is induced then Christen is undoable. Cold, advanced things are induced. All undoable, induced things are assentient. Christen is not chiasmatic.", "logic": "\nChiasmatic(chaddie)\nAdvanced(chaddie)\nAdvanced(christen)\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Alabaster(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Undoable(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Chiasmatic(x))\nInduced(christen) -> Undoable(christen)\nforall x (Alabaster(x) and Advanced(x) -> Induced(x))\nforall x (Undoable(x) and Induced(x) -> Assentient(x))\n\nnot Chiasmatic(christen)\n\nAdvanced(christen) and forall x (Advanced(x) -> Chiasmatic(x)) -> therefore Chiasmatic(christen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Richie is subacid. Richie is corruptive. Lory is corruptive. If something is corruptive then it is tectonic. All corruptive things are viviparous. Rough things are subacid. If Lory is aberrant then Lory is viviparous. Cold, corruptive things are aberrant. All viviparous, aberrant things are wormlike. Lory is aberrant.", "logic": "\nSubacid(richie)\nCorruptive(richie)\nCorruptive(lory)\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Viviparous(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> Subacid(x))\nAberrant(lory) -> Viviparous(lory)\nforall x (Tectonic(x) and Corruptive(x) -> Aberrant(x))\nforall x (Viviparous(x) and Aberrant(x) -> Wormlike(x))\n\nAberrant(lory)\n\nCorruptive(lory) and forall x (Corruptive(x) -> Tectonic(x)) -> therefore Tectonic(lory) Tectonic(lory) and Corruptive(lory) and forall x (Tectonic(x) and Corruptive(x) -> Aberrant(x)) -> therefore Aberrant(lory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Tonya is ironlike. Tonya is mere. Alethea is mere. If something is mere then it is minoan. All mere things are insectan. Rough things are ironlike. If Alethea is umpteen then Alethea is insectan. Cold, mere things are umpteen. All insectan, umpteen things are bias. Tonya is not umpteen.", "logic": "\nIronlike(tonya)\nMere(tonya)\nMere(alethea)\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Minoan(x))\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Insectan(x))\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Ironlike(x))\nUmpteen(alethea) -> Insectan(alethea)\nforall x (Minoan(x) and Mere(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) and Umpteen(x) -> Bias(x))\n\nnot Umpteen(tonya)\n\nMere(tonya) and forall x (Mere(x) -> Minoan(x)) -> therefore Minoan(tonya) Minoan(tonya) and Mere(tonya) and forall x (Minoan(x) and Mere(x) -> Umpteen(x)) -> therefore Umpteen(tonya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Audie is epical. Audie is baggy. Sadie is baggy. If something is baggy then it is unfirm. All baggy things are encased. Rough things are epical. If Sadie is somnolent then Sadie is encased. Cold, baggy things are somnolent. All encased, somnolent things are fourhanded. Sadie is fourhanded.", "logic": "\nEpical(audie)\nBaggy(audie)\nBaggy(sadie)\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Encased(x))\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Epical(x))\nSomnolent(sadie) -> Encased(sadie)\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Baggy(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) and Somnolent(x) -> Fourhanded(x))\n\nFourhanded(sadie)\n\nBaggy(sadie) and forall x (Baggy(x) -> Encased(x)) -> therefore Encased(sadie) Baggy(sadie) and forall x (Baggy(x) -> Unfirm(x)) -> therefore Unfirm(sadie) Unfirm(sadie) and Baggy(sadie) and forall x (Unfirm(x) and Baggy(x) -> Somnolent(x)) -> therefore Somnolent(sadie) Encased(sadie) and Somnolent(sadie) and forall x (Encased(x) and Somnolent(x) -> Fourhanded(x)) -> therefore Fourhanded(sadie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Rochella is nonpolar. Rochella is wifelike. Brant is wifelike. If something is wifelike then it is walleyed. All wifelike things are blatant. Rough things are nonpolar. If Brant is concluding then Brant is blatant. Cold, wifelike things are concluding. All blatant, concluding things are coalesced. Rochella is not coalesced.", "logic": "\nNonpolar(rochella)\nWifelike(rochella)\nWifelike(brant)\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Blatant(x))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Nonpolar(x))\nConcluding(brant) -> Blatant(brant)\nforall x (Walleyed(x) and Wifelike(x) -> Concluding(x))\nforall x (Blatant(x) and Concluding(x) -> Coalesced(x))\n\nnot Coalesced(rochella)\n\nWifelike(rochella) and forall x (Wifelike(x) -> Blatant(x)) -> therefore Blatant(rochella) Wifelike(rochella) and forall x (Wifelike(x) -> Walleyed(x)) -> therefore Walleyed(rochella) Walleyed(rochella) and Wifelike(rochella) and forall x (Walleyed(x) and Wifelike(x) -> Concluding(x)) -> therefore Concluding(rochella) Blatant(rochella) and Concluding(rochella) and forall x (Blatant(x) and Concluding(x) -> Coalesced(x)) -> therefore Coalesced(rochella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Fred is recurrent. Fred is elementary. Frances is elementary. If something is elementary then it is bereaved. All elementary things are monotone. Rough things are recurrent. If Frances is sclerosed then Frances is monotone. Cold, elementary things are sclerosed. All monotone, sclerosed things are natal. Fred is not big.", "logic": "\nRecurrent(fred)\nElementary(fred)\nElementary(frances)\nforall x (Elementary(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Elementary(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Elementary(x) -> Recurrent(x))\nSclerosed(frances) -> Monotone(frances)\nforall x (Bereaved(x) and Elementary(x) -> Sclerosed(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) and Sclerosed(x) -> Natal(x))\n\nnot Big(fred)\n\nnot Big(fred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Royal is toiling. Royal is nominated. Brunhilde is nominated. If something is nominated then it is idealized. All nominated things are subliminal. Rough things are toiling. If Brunhilde is shuddery then Brunhilde is subliminal. Cold, nominated things are shuddery. All subliminal, shuddery things are pitchy. Brunhilde is big.", "logic": "\nToiling(royal)\nNominated(royal)\nNominated(brunhilde)\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> Toiling(x))\nShuddery(brunhilde) -> Subliminal(brunhilde)\nforall x (Idealized(x) and Nominated(x) -> Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Subliminal(x) and Shuddery(x) -> Pitchy(x))\n\nBig(brunhilde)\n\nBig(brunhilde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "The wanda is deist. The wanda omit the storm. The storm does not visit the wanda. If something omit the storm then the storm omit the wanda. If something omit the wanda and it omit the storm then the storm roach the wanda. If the storm is inquiring then the storm is empowered. If something fine the wanda then the wanda omit the storm. If something is inquiring then it fine the wanda. If something omit the wanda then it is inquiring. If something omit the wanda then it is inquiring. If the wanda omit the storm then the wanda does not visit the storm. The wanda is deist.", "logic": "\nDeist(wanda)\nOmit(wanda, storm)\nnot Roach(storm, wanda)\nforall x (Omit(x, storm) -> Omit(storm, wanda))\nforall x (Omit(x, wanda) and Omit(x, storm) -> Roach(storm, wanda))\nInquiring(storm) -> Empowered(storm)\nforall x (Fine(x, wanda) -> Omit(wanda, storm))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) -> Fine(x, wanda))\nforall x (Omit(x, wanda) -> Inquiring(x))\nforall x (Omit(x, wanda) -> Inquiring(x))\nOmit(wanda, storm) -> not Roach(wanda, storm)\n\nDeist(wanda)\n\ntherefore Deist(wanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The dyanne is delirious. The dyanne permeate the colbert. The colbert does not visit the dyanne. If something permeate the colbert then the colbert permeate the dyanne. If something permeate the dyanne and it permeate the colbert then the colbert enkindle the dyanne. If the colbert is stomatous then the colbert is such. If something vellicate the dyanne then the dyanne permeate the colbert. If something is stomatous then it vellicate the dyanne. If something permeate the dyanne then it is stomatous. If something permeate the dyanne then it is stomatous. If the dyanne permeate the colbert then the dyanne does not visit the colbert. The dyanne is not delirious.", "logic": "\nDelirious(dyanne)\nPermeate(dyanne, colbert)\nnot Enkindle(colbert, dyanne)\nforall x (Permeate(x, colbert) -> Permeate(colbert, dyanne))\nforall x (Permeate(x, dyanne) and Permeate(x, colbert) -> Enkindle(colbert, dyanne))\nStomatous(colbert) -> Such(colbert)\nforall x (Vellicate(x, dyanne) -> Permeate(dyanne, colbert))\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> Vellicate(x, dyanne))\nforall x (Permeate(x, dyanne) -> Stomatous(x))\nforall x (Permeate(x, dyanne) -> Stomatous(x))\nPermeate(dyanne, colbert) -> not Enkindle(dyanne, colbert)\n\nnot Delirious(dyanne)\n\ntherefore Delirious(dyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The cary is conserved. The cary syllogize the sophi. The sophi does not visit the cary. If something syllogize the sophi then the sophi syllogize the cary. If something syllogize the cary and it syllogize the sophi then the sophi gratify the cary. If the sophi is needless then the sophi is epideictic. If something variegate the cary then the cary syllogize the sophi. If something is needless then it variegate the cary. If something syllogize the cary then it is needless. If something syllogize the cary then it is needless. If the cary syllogize the sophi then the cary does not visit the sophi. The sophi syllogize the cary.", "logic": "\nConserved(cary)\nSyllogize(cary, sophi)\nnot Gratify(sophi, cary)\nforall x (Syllogize(x, sophi) -> Syllogize(sophi, cary))\nforall x (Syllogize(x, cary) and Syllogize(x, sophi) -> Gratify(sophi, cary))\nNeedless(sophi) -> Epideictic(sophi)\nforall x (Variegate(x, cary) -> Syllogize(cary, sophi))\nforall x (Needless(x) -> Variegate(x, cary))\nforall x (Syllogize(x, cary) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Syllogize(x, cary) -> Needless(x))\nSyllogize(cary, sophi) -> not Gratify(cary, sophi)\n\nSyllogize(sophi, cary)\n\nSyllogize(cary, sophi) and forall x (Syllogize(x, sophi) -> Syllogize(sophi, cary)) -> therefore Syllogize(sophi, cary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The jolene is freehanded. The jolene undeceive the cybelle. The cybelle does not visit the jolene. If something undeceive the cybelle then the cybelle undeceive the jolene. If something undeceive the jolene and it undeceive the cybelle then the cybelle enwrap the jolene. If the cybelle is katabolic then the cybelle is makeshift. If something fart the jolene then the jolene undeceive the cybelle. If something is katabolic then it fart the jolene. If something undeceive the jolene then it is katabolic. If something undeceive the jolene then it is katabolic. If the jolene undeceive the cybelle then the jolene does not visit the cybelle. The jolene enwrap the cybelle.", "logic": "\nFreehanded(jolene)\nUndeceive(jolene, cybelle)\nnot Enwrap(cybelle, jolene)\nforall x (Undeceive(x, cybelle) -> Undeceive(cybelle, jolene))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, jolene) and Undeceive(x, cybelle) -> Enwrap(cybelle, jolene))\nKatabolic(cybelle) -> Makeshift(cybelle)\nforall x (Fart(x, jolene) -> Undeceive(jolene, cybelle))\nforall x (Katabolic(x) -> Fart(x, jolene))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, jolene) -> Katabolic(x))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, jolene) -> Katabolic(x))\nUndeceive(jolene, cybelle) -> not Enwrap(jolene, cybelle)\n\nEnwrap(jolene, cybelle)\n\nUndeceive(jolene, cybelle) and Undeceive(jolene, cybelle) -> not Enwrap(jolene, cybelle) -> therefore not Enwrap(jolene, cybelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The rees is scholastic. The rees smuggle the gretchen. The gretchen does not visit the rees. If something smuggle the gretchen then the gretchen smuggle the rees. If something smuggle the rees and it smuggle the gretchen then the gretchen aggravate the rees. If the gretchen is ignorant then the gretchen is impressive. If something polka the rees then the rees smuggle the gretchen. If something is ignorant then it polka the rees. If something smuggle the rees then it is ignorant. If something smuggle the rees then it is ignorant. If the rees smuggle the gretchen then the rees does not visit the gretchen. The gretchen is ignorant.", "logic": "\nScholastic(rees)\nSmuggle(rees, gretchen)\nnot Aggravate(gretchen, rees)\nforall x (Smuggle(x, gretchen) -> Smuggle(gretchen, rees))\nforall x (Smuggle(x, rees) and Smuggle(x, gretchen) -> Aggravate(gretchen, rees))\nIgnorant(gretchen) -> Impressive(gretchen)\nforall x (Polka(x, rees) -> Smuggle(rees, gretchen))\nforall x (Ignorant(x) -> Polka(x, rees))\nforall x (Smuggle(x, rees) -> Ignorant(x))\nforall x (Smuggle(x, rees) -> Ignorant(x))\nSmuggle(rees, gretchen) -> not Aggravate(rees, gretchen)\n\nIgnorant(gretchen)\n\nSmuggle(rees, gretchen) and forall x (Smuggle(x, gretchen) -> Smuggle(gretchen, rees)) -> therefore Smuggle(gretchen, rees) Smuggle(gretchen, rees) and forall x (Smuggle(x, rees) -> Ignorant(x)) -> therefore Ignorant(gretchen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The madelaine is biramous. The madelaine iodize the judi. The judi does not visit the madelaine. If something iodize the judi then the judi iodize the madelaine. If something iodize the madelaine and it iodize the judi then the judi coffin the madelaine. If the judi is grouchy then the judi is immune. If something cheek the madelaine then the madelaine iodize the judi. If something is grouchy then it cheek the madelaine. If something iodize the madelaine then it is grouchy. If something iodize the madelaine then it is grouchy. If the madelaine iodize the judi then the madelaine does not visit the judi. The judi is not grouchy.", "logic": "\nBiramous(madelaine)\nIodize(madelaine, judi)\nnot Coffin(judi, madelaine)\nforall x (Iodize(x, judi) -> Iodize(judi, madelaine))\nforall x (Iodize(x, madelaine) and Iodize(x, judi) -> Coffin(judi, madelaine))\nGrouchy(judi) -> Immune(judi)\nforall x (Cheek(x, madelaine) -> Iodize(madelaine, judi))\nforall x (Grouchy(x) -> Cheek(x, madelaine))\nforall x (Iodize(x, madelaine) -> Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Iodize(x, madelaine) -> Grouchy(x))\nIodize(madelaine, judi) -> not Coffin(madelaine, judi)\n\nnot Grouchy(judi)\n\nIodize(madelaine, judi) and forall x (Iodize(x, judi) -> Iodize(judi, madelaine)) -> therefore Iodize(judi, madelaine) Iodize(judi, madelaine) and forall x (Iodize(x, madelaine) -> Grouchy(x)) -> therefore Grouchy(judi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The alaa is bosky. The alaa slum the edeline. The edeline does not visit the alaa. If something slum the edeline then the edeline slum the alaa. If something slum the alaa and it slum the edeline then the edeline mentor the alaa. If the edeline is goodly then the edeline is anguillan. If something mothball the alaa then the alaa slum the edeline. If something is goodly then it mothball the alaa. If something slum the alaa then it is goodly. If something slum the alaa then it is goodly. If the alaa slum the edeline then the alaa does not visit the edeline. The edeline is anguillan.", "logic": "\nBosky(alaa)\nSlum(alaa, edeline)\nnot Mentor(edeline, alaa)\nforall x (Slum(x, edeline) -> Slum(edeline, alaa))\nforall x (Slum(x, alaa) and Slum(x, edeline) -> Mentor(edeline, alaa))\nGoodly(edeline) -> Anguillan(edeline)\nforall x (Mothball(x, alaa) -> Slum(alaa, edeline))\nforall x (Goodly(x) -> Mothball(x, alaa))\nforall x (Slum(x, alaa) -> Goodly(x))\nforall x (Slum(x, alaa) -> Goodly(x))\nSlum(alaa, edeline) -> not Mentor(alaa, edeline)\n\nAnguillan(edeline)\n\nSlum(alaa, edeline) and forall x (Slum(x, edeline) -> Slum(edeline, alaa)) -> therefore Slum(edeline, alaa) Slum(edeline, alaa) and forall x (Slum(x, alaa) -> Goodly(x)) -> therefore Goodly(edeline) Goodly(edeline) and Goodly(edeline) -> Anguillan(edeline) -> therefore Anguillan(edeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The ingamar is lobar. The ingamar limit the paige. The paige does not visit the ingamar. If something limit the paige then the paige limit the ingamar. If something limit the ingamar and it limit the paige then the paige cannulate the ingamar. If the paige is cubic then the paige is unsexed. If something console the ingamar then the ingamar limit the paige. If something is cubic then it console the ingamar. If something limit the ingamar then it is cubic. If something limit the ingamar then it is cubic. If the ingamar limit the paige then the ingamar does not visit the paige. The paige is not unsexed.", "logic": "\nLobar(ingamar)\nLimit(ingamar, paige)\nnot Cannulate(paige, ingamar)\nforall x (Limit(x, paige) -> Limit(paige, ingamar))\nforall x (Limit(x, ingamar) and Limit(x, paige) -> Cannulate(paige, ingamar))\nCubic(paige) -> Unsexed(paige)\nforall x (Console(x, ingamar) -> Limit(ingamar, paige))\nforall x (Cubic(x) -> Console(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Limit(x, ingamar) -> Cubic(x))\nforall x (Limit(x, ingamar) -> Cubic(x))\nLimit(ingamar, paige) -> not Cannulate(ingamar, paige)\n\nnot Unsexed(paige)\n\nLimit(ingamar, paige) and forall x (Limit(x, paige) -> Limit(paige, ingamar)) -> therefore Limit(paige, ingamar) Limit(paige, ingamar) and forall x (Limit(x, ingamar) -> Cubic(x)) -> therefore Cubic(paige) Cubic(paige) and Cubic(paige) -> Unsexed(paige) -> therefore Unsexed(paige)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The britney is moved. The britney plight the france. The france does not visit the britney. If something plight the france then the france plight the britney. If something plight the britney and it plight the france then the france annihilate the britney. If the france is blest then the france is musical. If something girdle the britney then the britney plight the france. If something is blest then it girdle the britney. If something plight the britney then it is blest. If something plight the britney then it is blest. If the britney plight the france then the britney does not visit the france. The britney is not blest.", "logic": "\nMoved(britney)\nPlight(britney, france)\nnot Annihilate(france, britney)\nforall x (Plight(x, france) -> Plight(france, britney))\nforall x (Plight(x, britney) and Plight(x, france) -> Annihilate(france, britney))\nBlest(france) -> Musical(france)\nforall x (Girdle(x, britney) -> Plight(britney, france))\nforall x (Blest(x) -> Girdle(x, britney))\nforall x (Plight(x, britney) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Plight(x, britney) -> Blest(x))\nPlight(britney, france) -> not Annihilate(britney, france)\n\nnot Blest(britney)\n\nforall x (Plight(x, britney) -> Blest(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The emmit is airtight. The emmit stylize the colly. The colly does not visit the emmit. If something stylize the colly then the colly stylize the emmit. If something stylize the emmit and it stylize the colly then the colly marry the emmit. If the colly is choosey then the colly is unstinting. If something annoy the emmit then the emmit stylize the colly. If something is choosey then it annoy the emmit. If something stylize the emmit then it is choosey. If something stylize the emmit then it is choosey. If the emmit stylize the colly then the emmit does not visit the colly. The emmit annoy the emmit.", "logic": "\nAirtight(emmit)\nStylize(emmit, colly)\nnot Marry(colly, emmit)\nforall x (Stylize(x, colly) -> Stylize(colly, emmit))\nforall x (Stylize(x, emmit) and Stylize(x, colly) -> Marry(colly, emmit))\nChoosey(colly) -> Unstinting(colly)\nforall x (Annoy(x, emmit) -> Stylize(emmit, colly))\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Annoy(x, emmit))\nforall x (Stylize(x, emmit) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Stylize(x, emmit) -> Choosey(x))\nStylize(emmit, colly) -> not Marry(emmit, colly)\n\nAnnoy(emmit, emmit)\n\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Annoy(x, emmit)) <- forall x (Stylize(x, emmit) -> Choosey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The sinead is artless. The sinead rouge the rufe. The rufe does not visit the sinead. If something rouge the rufe then the rufe rouge the sinead. If something rouge the sinead and it rouge the rufe then the rufe bedamn the sinead. If the rufe is identified then the rufe is waxing. If something eternalize the sinead then the sinead rouge the rufe. If something is identified then it eternalize the sinead. If something rouge the sinead then it is identified. If something rouge the sinead then it is identified. If the sinead rouge the rufe then the sinead does not visit the rufe. The rufe is not artless.", "logic": "\nArtless(sinead)\nRouge(sinead, rufe)\nnot Bedamn(rufe, sinead)\nforall x (Rouge(x, rufe) -> Rouge(rufe, sinead))\nforall x (Rouge(x, sinead) and Rouge(x, rufe) -> Bedamn(rufe, sinead))\nIdentified(rufe) -> Waxing(rufe)\nforall x (Eternalize(x, sinead) -> Rouge(sinead, rufe))\nforall x (Identified(x) -> Eternalize(x, sinead))\nforall x (Rouge(x, sinead) -> Identified(x))\nforall x (Rouge(x, sinead) -> Identified(x))\nRouge(sinead, rufe) -> not Bedamn(sinead, rufe)\n\nnot Artless(rufe)\n\nnot Artless(rufe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The moya is tendinous. The moya criticise the verina. The verina does not visit the moya. If something criticise the verina then the verina criticise the moya. If something criticise the moya and it criticise the verina then the verina halve the moya. If the verina is flagrant then the verina is furrowed. If something conga the moya then the moya criticise the verina. If something is flagrant then it conga the moya. If something criticise the moya then it is flagrant. If something criticise the moya then it is flagrant. If the moya criticise the verina then the moya does not visit the verina. The verina is cold.", "logic": "\nTendinous(moya)\nCriticise(moya, verina)\nnot Halve(verina, moya)\nforall x (Criticise(x, verina) -> Criticise(verina, moya))\nforall x (Criticise(x, moya) and Criticise(x, verina) -> Halve(verina, moya))\nFlagrant(verina) -> Furrowed(verina)\nforall x (Conga(x, moya) -> Criticise(moya, verina))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Conga(x, moya))\nforall x (Criticise(x, moya) -> Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Criticise(x, moya) -> Flagrant(x))\nCriticise(moya, verina) -> not Halve(moya, verina)\n\nCold(verina)\n\nCold(verina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The benito is genovese. The benito abhor the davin. The davin does not visit the benito. If something abhor the davin then the davin abhor the benito. If something abhor the benito and it abhor the davin then the davin pattern the benito. If the davin is wired then the davin is unequipped. If something instigate the benito then the benito abhor the davin. If something is wired then it instigate the benito. If something abhor the benito then it is wired. If something abhor the benito then it is wired. If the benito abhor the davin then the benito does not visit the davin. The benito is not cold.", "logic": "\nGenovese(benito)\nAbhor(benito, davin)\nnot Pattern(davin, benito)\nforall x (Abhor(x, davin) -> Abhor(davin, benito))\nforall x (Abhor(x, benito) and Abhor(x, davin) -> Pattern(davin, benito))\nWired(davin) -> Unequipped(davin)\nforall x (Instigate(x, benito) -> Abhor(benito, davin))\nforall x (Wired(x) -> Instigate(x, benito))\nforall x (Abhor(x, benito) -> Wired(x))\nforall x (Abhor(x, benito) -> Wired(x))\nAbhor(benito, davin) -> not Pattern(benito, davin)\n\nnot Cold(benito)\n\nnot Cold(benito) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The ivy is chunky. The ivy copyedit the wrennie. The wrennie does not visit the ivy. If something copyedit the wrennie then the wrennie copyedit the ivy. If something copyedit the ivy and it copyedit the wrennie then the wrennie impair the ivy. If the wrennie is blockading then the wrennie is glum. If something fetter the ivy then the ivy copyedit the wrennie. If something is blockading then it fetter the ivy. If something copyedit the ivy then it is blockading. If something copyedit the ivy then it is blockading. If the ivy copyedit the wrennie then the ivy does not visit the wrennie. The ivy is red.", "logic": "\nChunky(ivy)\nCopyedit(ivy, wrennie)\nnot Impair(wrennie, ivy)\nforall x (Copyedit(x, wrennie) -> Copyedit(wrennie, ivy))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, ivy) and Copyedit(x, wrennie) -> Impair(wrennie, ivy))\nBlockading(wrennie) -> Glum(wrennie)\nforall x (Fetter(x, ivy) -> Copyedit(ivy, wrennie))\nforall x (Blockading(x) -> Fetter(x, ivy))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, ivy) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, ivy) -> Blockading(x))\nCopyedit(ivy, wrennie) -> not Impair(ivy, wrennie)\n\nRed(ivy)\n\nRed(ivy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The brooke is bimestrial. The brooke secularize the marylee. The marylee does not visit the brooke. If something secularize the marylee then the marylee secularize the brooke. If something secularize the brooke and it secularize the marylee then the marylee clitter the brooke. If the marylee is aflame then the marylee is tenable. If something backfire the brooke then the brooke secularize the marylee. If something is aflame then it backfire the brooke. If something secularize the brooke then it is aflame. If something secularize the brooke then it is aflame. If the brooke secularize the marylee then the brooke does not visit the marylee. The brooke does not visit the brooke.", "logic": "\nBimestrial(brooke)\nSecularize(brooke, marylee)\nnot Clitter(marylee, brooke)\nforall x (Secularize(x, marylee) -> Secularize(marylee, brooke))\nforall x (Secularize(x, brooke) and Secularize(x, marylee) -> Clitter(marylee, brooke))\nAflame(marylee) -> Tenable(marylee)\nforall x (Backfire(x, brooke) -> Secularize(brooke, marylee))\nforall x (Aflame(x) -> Backfire(x, brooke))\nforall x (Secularize(x, brooke) -> Aflame(x))\nforall x (Secularize(x, brooke) -> Aflame(x))\nSecularize(brooke, marylee) -> not Clitter(brooke, marylee)\n\nnot Clitter(brooke, brooke)\n\nnot Clitter(brooke, brooke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The willie is psychotic. The willie motivate the waly. The waly does not visit the willie. If something motivate the waly then the waly motivate the willie. If something motivate the willie and it motivate the waly then the waly valuate the willie. If the waly is athletic then the waly is amnesic. If something permute the willie then the willie motivate the waly. If something is athletic then it permute the willie. If something motivate the willie then it is athletic. If something motivate the willie then it is athletic. If the willie motivate the waly then the willie does not visit the waly. The waly valuate the waly.", "logic": "\nPsychotic(willie)\nMotivate(willie, waly)\nnot Valuate(waly, willie)\nforall x (Motivate(x, waly) -> Motivate(waly, willie))\nforall x (Motivate(x, willie) and Motivate(x, waly) -> Valuate(waly, willie))\nAthletic(waly) -> Amnesic(waly)\nforall x (Permute(x, willie) -> Motivate(willie, waly))\nforall x (Athletic(x) -> Permute(x, willie))\nforall x (Motivate(x, willie) -> Athletic(x))\nforall x (Motivate(x, willie) -> Athletic(x))\nMotivate(willie, waly) -> not Valuate(willie, waly)\n\nValuate(waly, waly)\n\nValuate(waly, waly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "Jefferey is not oafish. Jefferey is escaped. Mirilla is tokenish. Mirilla is remote. Fina is behind. Fina is not cuticular. Frieda is behind. Cold, oafish people are finer. If someone is tokenish then they are oafish. If someone is behind then they are oafish. If Mirilla is cuticular then Mirilla is behind. If Mirilla is escaped and Mirilla is not tokenish then Mirilla is cuticular. All tokenish people are cuticular. Jefferey is escaped.", "logic": "\nnot Oafish(jefferey)\nEscaped(jefferey)\nTokenish(mirilla)\nRemote(mirilla)\nBehind(fina)\nnot Cuticular(fina)\nBehind(frieda)\nforall x (Behind(x) and Oafish(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Tokenish(x) -> Oafish(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Oafish(x))\nCuticular(mirilla) -> Behind(mirilla)\nEscaped(mirilla) and not Tokenish(mirilla) -> Cuticular(mirilla)\nforall x (Tokenish(x) -> Cuticular(x))\n\nEscaped(jefferey)\n\ntherefore Escaped(jefferey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Bernete is not anile. Bernete is favorable. Ichabod is passerine. Ichabod is here. Giffer is overactive. Giffer is not episcopal. Herculie is overactive. Cold, anile people are frowsy. If someone is passerine then they are anile. If someone is overactive then they are anile. If Ichabod is episcopal then Ichabod is overactive. If Ichabod is favorable and Ichabod is not passerine then Ichabod is episcopal. All passerine people are episcopal. Giffer is not overactive.", "logic": "\nnot Anile(bernete)\nFavorable(bernete)\nPasserine(ichabod)\nHere(ichabod)\nOveractive(giffer)\nnot Episcopal(giffer)\nOveractive(herculie)\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Anile(x) -> Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Anile(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Anile(x))\nEpiscopal(ichabod) -> Overactive(ichabod)\nFavorable(ichabod) and not Passerine(ichabod) -> Episcopal(ichabod)\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Episcopal(x))\n\nnot Overactive(giffer)\n\ntherefore Overactive(giffer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Stepha is not wired. Stepha is lipophilic. Bertina is emarginate. Bertina is monovular. Jedediah is tribal. Jedediah is not livid. Angelita is tribal. Cold, wired people are eulogistic. If someone is emarginate then they are wired. If someone is tribal then they are wired. If Bertina is livid then Bertina is tribal. If Bertina is lipophilic and Bertina is not emarginate then Bertina is livid. All emarginate people are livid. Bertina is wired.", "logic": "\nnot Wired(stepha)\nLipophilic(stepha)\nEmarginate(bertina)\nMonovular(bertina)\nTribal(jedediah)\nnot Livid(jedediah)\nTribal(angelita)\nforall x (Tribal(x) and Wired(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Wired(x))\nforall x (Tribal(x) -> Wired(x))\nLivid(bertina) -> Tribal(bertina)\nLipophilic(bertina) and not Emarginate(bertina) -> Livid(bertina)\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Livid(x))\n\nWired(bertina)\n\nEmarginate(bertina) and forall x (Emarginate(x) -> Wired(x)) -> therefore Wired(bertina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Oliy is not rimmed. Oliy is stealthy. Hammad is mammary. Hammad is overladen. Nanci is binaural. Nanci is not resolved. Wilmar is binaural. Cold, rimmed people are mandaean. If someone is mammary then they are rimmed. If someone is binaural then they are rimmed. If Hammad is resolved then Hammad is binaural. If Hammad is stealthy and Hammad is not mammary then Hammad is resolved. All mammary people are resolved. Hammad is not resolved.", "logic": "\nnot Rimmed(oliy)\nStealthy(oliy)\nMammary(hammad)\nOverladen(hammad)\nBinaural(nanci)\nnot Resolved(nanci)\nBinaural(wilmar)\nforall x (Binaural(x) and Rimmed(x) -> Mandaean(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) -> Rimmed(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Rimmed(x))\nResolved(hammad) -> Binaural(hammad)\nStealthy(hammad) and not Mammary(hammad) -> Resolved(hammad)\nforall x (Mammary(x) -> Resolved(x))\n\nnot Resolved(hammad)\n\nMammary(hammad) and forall x (Mammary(x) -> Resolved(x)) -> therefore Resolved(hammad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Sindee is not monovular. Sindee is splayfoot. Nickie is undigested. Nickie is slushy. Winfred is fallen. Winfred is not thrilling. Gretchen is fallen. Cold, monovular people are bowery. If someone is undigested then they are monovular. If someone is fallen then they are monovular. If Nickie is thrilling then Nickie is fallen. If Nickie is splayfoot and Nickie is not undigested then Nickie is thrilling. All undigested people are thrilling. Nickie is fallen.", "logic": "\nnot Monovular(sindee)\nSplayfoot(sindee)\nUndigested(nickie)\nSlushy(nickie)\nFallen(winfred)\nnot Thrilling(winfred)\nFallen(gretchen)\nforall x (Fallen(x) and Monovular(x) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Fallen(x) -> Monovular(x))\nThrilling(nickie) -> Fallen(nickie)\nSplayfoot(nickie) and not Undigested(nickie) -> Thrilling(nickie)\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> Thrilling(x))\n\nFallen(nickie)\n\nUndigested(nickie) and forall x (Undigested(x) -> Thrilling(x)) -> therefore Thrilling(nickie) Thrilling(nickie) and Thrilling(nickie) -> Fallen(nickie) -> therefore Fallen(nickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Alia is not arbitral. Alia is melancholy. Martelle is chondritic. Martelle is phyletic. Madalena is gallant. Madalena is not healthful. Bekki is gallant. Cold, arbitral people are unswerving. If someone is chondritic then they are arbitral. If someone is gallant then they are arbitral. If Martelle is healthful then Martelle is gallant. If Martelle is melancholy and Martelle is not chondritic then Martelle is healthful. All chondritic people are healthful. Bekki is not unswerving.", "logic": "\nnot Arbitral(alia)\nMelancholy(alia)\nChondritic(martelle)\nPhyletic(martelle)\nGallant(madalena)\nnot Healthful(madalena)\nGallant(bekki)\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Arbitral(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Chondritic(x) -> Arbitral(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) -> Arbitral(x))\nHealthful(martelle) -> Gallant(martelle)\nMelancholy(martelle) and not Chondritic(martelle) -> Healthful(martelle)\nforall x (Chondritic(x) -> Healthful(x))\n\nnot Unswerving(bekki)\n\nGallant(bekki) and forall x (Gallant(x) -> Arbitral(x)) -> therefore Arbitral(bekki) Gallant(bekki) and Arbitral(bekki) and forall x (Gallant(x) and Arbitral(x) -> Unswerving(x)) -> therefore Unswerving(bekki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Kikelia is not censored. Kikelia is brittle. Gerhardt is crenulate. Gerhardt is wounding. Ellsworth is angled. Ellsworth is not directed. Neddy is angled. Cold, censored people are bungling. If someone is crenulate then they are censored. If someone is angled then they are censored. If Gerhardt is directed then Gerhardt is angled. If Gerhardt is brittle and Gerhardt is not crenulate then Gerhardt is directed. All crenulate people are directed. Gerhardt is bungling.", "logic": "\nnot Censored(kikelia)\nBrittle(kikelia)\nCrenulate(gerhardt)\nWounding(gerhardt)\nAngled(ellsworth)\nnot Directed(ellsworth)\nAngled(neddy)\nforall x (Angled(x) and Censored(x) -> Bungling(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Censored(x))\nforall x (Angled(x) -> Censored(x))\nDirected(gerhardt) -> Angled(gerhardt)\nBrittle(gerhardt) and not Crenulate(gerhardt) -> Directed(gerhardt)\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Directed(x))\n\nBungling(gerhardt)\n\nCrenulate(gerhardt) and forall x (Crenulate(x) -> Directed(x)) -> therefore Directed(gerhardt) Directed(gerhardt) and Directed(gerhardt) -> Angled(gerhardt) -> therefore Angled(gerhardt) Crenulate(gerhardt) and forall x (Crenulate(x) -> Censored(x)) -> therefore Censored(gerhardt) Angled(gerhardt) and Censored(gerhardt) and forall x (Angled(x) and Censored(x) -> Bungling(x)) -> therefore Bungling(gerhardt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Nikita is not unsanded. Nikita is achromatic. Nero is carolean. Nero is meridian. Omar is relational. Omar is not tyrolese. Rutger is relational. Cold, unsanded people are homy. If someone is carolean then they are unsanded. If someone is relational then they are unsanded. If Nero is tyrolese then Nero is relational. If Nero is achromatic and Nero is not carolean then Nero is tyrolese. All carolean people are tyrolese. Nero is not homy.", "logic": "\nnot Unsanded(nikita)\nAchromatic(nikita)\nCarolean(nero)\nMeridian(nero)\nRelational(omar)\nnot Tyrolese(omar)\nRelational(rutger)\nforall x (Relational(x) and Unsanded(x) -> Homy(x))\nforall x (Carolean(x) -> Unsanded(x))\nforall x (Relational(x) -> Unsanded(x))\nTyrolese(nero) -> Relational(nero)\nAchromatic(nero) and not Carolean(nero) -> Tyrolese(nero)\nforall x (Carolean(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\n\nnot Homy(nero)\n\nCarolean(nero) and forall x (Carolean(x) -> Tyrolese(x)) -> therefore Tyrolese(nero) Tyrolese(nero) and Tyrolese(nero) -> Relational(nero) -> therefore Relational(nero) Carolean(nero) and forall x (Carolean(x) -> Unsanded(x)) -> therefore Unsanded(nero) Relational(nero) and Unsanded(nero) and forall x (Relational(x) and Unsanded(x) -> Homy(x)) -> therefore Homy(nero)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Agnola is not soured. Agnola is grovelling. Sena is aloof. Sena is erudite. Melessa is abusive. Melessa is not isothermic. Kelsi is abusive. Cold, soured people are fiery. If someone is aloof then they are soured. If someone is abusive then they are soured. If Sena is isothermic then Sena is abusive. If Sena is grovelling and Sena is not aloof then Sena is isothermic. All aloof people are isothermic. Agnola is not fiery.", "logic": "\nnot Soured(agnola)\nGrovelling(agnola)\nAloof(sena)\nErudite(sena)\nAbusive(melessa)\nnot Isothermic(melessa)\nAbusive(kelsi)\nforall x (Abusive(x) and Soured(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Soured(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Soured(x))\nIsothermic(sena) -> Abusive(sena)\nGrovelling(sena) and not Aloof(sena) -> Isothermic(sena)\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Isothermic(x))\n\nnot Fiery(agnola)\n\nforall x (Abusive(x) and Soured(x) -> Fiery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Sarine is not delinquent. Sarine is convivial. Allyce is bully. Allyce is spheric. Waneta is monogamous. Waneta is not largo. Alister is monogamous. Cold, delinquent people are operatic. If someone is bully then they are delinquent. If someone is monogamous then they are delinquent. If Allyce is largo then Allyce is monogamous. If Allyce is convivial and Allyce is not bully then Allyce is largo. All bully people are largo. Sarine is largo.", "logic": "\nnot Delinquent(sarine)\nConvivial(sarine)\nBully(allyce)\nSpheric(allyce)\nMonogamous(waneta)\nnot Largo(waneta)\nMonogamous(alister)\nforall x (Monogamous(x) and Delinquent(x) -> Operatic(x))\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Monogamous(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nLargo(allyce) -> Monogamous(allyce)\nConvivial(allyce) and not Bully(allyce) -> Largo(allyce)\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Largo(x))\n\nLargo(sarine)\n\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Largo(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Trev is not royal. Trev is whacked. Marlon is culpable. Marlon is trained. Alina is elated. Alina is not stinky. Bjorne is elated. Cold, royal people are swanky. If someone is culpable then they are royal. If someone is elated then they are royal. If Marlon is stinky then Marlon is elated. If Marlon is whacked and Marlon is not culpable then Marlon is stinky. All culpable people are stinky. Bjorne is not stinky.", "logic": "\nnot Royal(trev)\nWhacked(trev)\nCulpable(marlon)\nTrained(marlon)\nElated(alina)\nnot Stinky(alina)\nElated(bjorne)\nforall x (Elated(x) and Royal(x) -> Swanky(x))\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Elated(x) -> Royal(x))\nStinky(marlon) -> Elated(marlon)\nWhacked(marlon) and not Culpable(marlon) -> Stinky(marlon)\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Stinky(x))\n\nnot Stinky(bjorne)\n\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Stinky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Alasdair is not unstilted. Alasdair is bitumenoid. Mervin is polytonal. Mervin is plutonian. Fabrianne is reasonless. Fabrianne is not packed. Steffi is reasonless. Cold, unstilted people are elected. If someone is polytonal then they are unstilted. If someone is reasonless then they are unstilted. If Mervin is packed then Mervin is reasonless. If Mervin is bitumenoid and Mervin is not polytonal then Mervin is packed. All polytonal people are packed. Alasdair is reasonless.", "logic": "\nnot Unstilted(alasdair)\nBitumenoid(alasdair)\nPolytonal(mervin)\nPlutonian(mervin)\nReasonless(fabrianne)\nnot Packed(fabrianne)\nReasonless(steffi)\nforall x (Reasonless(x) and Unstilted(x) -> Elected(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Reasonless(x) -> Unstilted(x))\nPacked(mervin) -> Reasonless(mervin)\nBitumenoid(mervin) and not Polytonal(mervin) -> Packed(mervin)\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Packed(x))\n\nReasonless(alasdair)\n\nReasonless(alasdair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Marylou is not unkept. Marylou is ponderous. Barbee is runny. Barbee is truant. Vanya is hornless. Vanya is not revokable. Odille is hornless. Cold, unkept people are loquacious. If someone is runny then they are unkept. If someone is hornless then they are unkept. If Barbee is revokable then Barbee is hornless. If Barbee is ponderous and Barbee is not runny then Barbee is revokable. All runny people are revokable. Vanya is not ponderous.", "logic": "\nnot Unkept(marylou)\nPonderous(marylou)\nRunny(barbee)\nTruant(barbee)\nHornless(vanya)\nnot Revokable(vanya)\nHornless(odille)\nforall x (Hornless(x) and Unkept(x) -> Loquacious(x))\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Hornless(x) -> Unkept(x))\nRevokable(barbee) -> Hornless(barbee)\nPonderous(barbee) and not Runny(barbee) -> Revokable(barbee)\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Revokable(x))\n\nnot Ponderous(vanya)\n\nnot Ponderous(vanya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Electra is not quack. Electra is motherlike. Davida is conic. Davida is sonsy. Barron is unpeopled. Barron is not baric. Liz is unpeopled. Cold, quack people are merited. If someone is conic then they are quack. If someone is unpeopled then they are quack. If Davida is baric then Davida is unpeopled. If Davida is motherlike and Davida is not conic then Davida is baric. All conic people are baric. Electra is sonsy.", "logic": "\nnot Quack(electra)\nMotherlike(electra)\nConic(davida)\nSonsy(davida)\nUnpeopled(barron)\nnot Baric(barron)\nUnpeopled(liz)\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) and Quack(x) -> Merited(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Quack(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) -> Quack(x))\nBaric(davida) -> Unpeopled(davida)\nMotherlike(davida) and not Conic(davida) -> Baric(davida)\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Baric(x))\n\nSonsy(electra)\n\nSonsy(electra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Jermaine is not sidearm. Jermaine is bonny. Russel is beguiled. Russel is floral. Bernelle is nordic. Bernelle is not cosy. Merrielle is nordic. Cold, sidearm people are starry. If someone is beguiled then they are sidearm. If someone is nordic then they are sidearm. If Russel is cosy then Russel is nordic. If Russel is bonny and Russel is not beguiled then Russel is cosy. All beguiled people are cosy. Bernelle is not beguiled.", "logic": "\nnot Sidearm(jermaine)\nBonny(jermaine)\nBeguiled(russel)\nFloral(russel)\nNordic(bernelle)\nnot Cosy(bernelle)\nNordic(merrielle)\nforall x (Nordic(x) and Sidearm(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nforall x (Nordic(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nCosy(russel) -> Nordic(russel)\nBonny(russel) and not Beguiled(russel) -> Cosy(russel)\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> Cosy(x))\n\nnot Beguiled(bernelle)\n\nnot Beguiled(bernelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Franklin is not uptown. Franklin is lengthwise. Durand is awninged. Durand is unilateral. Cyndy is petalled. Cyndy is not uncaring. Cordelia is petalled. Cold, uptown people are androgenic. If someone is awninged then they are uptown. If someone is petalled then they are uptown. If Durand is uncaring then Durand is petalled. If Durand is lengthwise and Durand is not awninged then Durand is uncaring. All awninged people are uncaring. Cyndy is unilateral.", "logic": "\nnot Uptown(franklin)\nLengthwise(franklin)\nAwninged(durand)\nUnilateral(durand)\nPetalled(cyndy)\nnot Uncaring(cyndy)\nPetalled(cordelia)\nforall x (Petalled(x) and Uptown(x) -> Androgenic(x))\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Uptown(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) -> Uptown(x))\nUncaring(durand) -> Petalled(durand)\nLengthwise(durand) and not Awninged(durand) -> Uncaring(durand)\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Uncaring(x))\n\nUnilateral(cyndy)\n\nUnilateral(cyndy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "The kayle is jobless. The kayle blur the allyn. The kayle channelise the tessy. The tessy bruit the allyn. The tessy channelise the kayle. The tessy channelise the allyn. The allyn does not need the kayle. If someone bruit the tessy then they are pyrrhic. If someone bruit the tessy and they are not linguistic then they visit the tessy. If someone is pyrrhic then they do not visit the allyn. If someone bruit the kayle and they are jobless then they need the tessy. If someone blur the allyn then they need the tessy. If the allyn bruit the kayle then the allyn bruit the tessy. The kayle blur the allyn.", "logic": "\nJobless(kayle)\nBlur(kayle, allyn)\nChannelise(kayle, tessy)\nBruit(tessy, allyn)\nChannelise(tessy, kayle)\nChannelise(tessy, allyn)\nnot Bruit(allyn, kayle)\nforall x (Bruit(x, tessy) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nforall x (Bruit(x, tessy) and not Linguistic(x) -> Channelise(x, tessy))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) -> not Channelise(x, allyn))\nforall x (Bruit(x, kayle) and Jobless(x) -> Bruit(x, tessy))\nforall x (Blur(x, allyn) -> Bruit(x, tessy))\nBruit(allyn, kayle) -> Bruit(allyn, tessy)\n\nBlur(kayle, allyn)\n\ntherefore Blur(kayle, allyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The farrand is blear. The farrand niggle the taite. The farrand unbar the steffie. The steffie swinge the taite. The steffie unbar the farrand. The steffie unbar the taite. The taite does not need the farrand. If someone swinge the steffie then they are tympanic. If someone swinge the steffie and they are not allergenic then they visit the steffie. If someone is tympanic then they do not visit the taite. If someone swinge the farrand and they are blear then they need the steffie. If someone niggle the taite then they need the steffie. If the taite swinge the farrand then the taite swinge the steffie. The steffie does not visit the farrand.", "logic": "\nBlear(farrand)\nNiggle(farrand, taite)\nUnbar(farrand, steffie)\nSwinge(steffie, taite)\nUnbar(steffie, farrand)\nUnbar(steffie, taite)\nnot Swinge(taite, farrand)\nforall x (Swinge(x, steffie) -> Tympanic(x))\nforall x (Swinge(x, steffie) and not Allergenic(x) -> Unbar(x, steffie))\nforall x (Tympanic(x) -> not Unbar(x, taite))\nforall x (Swinge(x, farrand) and Blear(x) -> Swinge(x, steffie))\nforall x (Niggle(x, taite) -> Swinge(x, steffie))\nSwinge(taite, farrand) -> Swinge(taite, steffie)\n\nnot Unbar(steffie, farrand)\n\ntherefore Unbar(steffie, farrand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The francine is assistant. The francine apportion the cyril. The francine equalise the moyra. The moyra brachiate the cyril. The moyra equalise the francine. The moyra equalise the cyril. The cyril does not need the francine. If someone brachiate the moyra then they are tied. If someone brachiate the moyra and they are not allegretto then they visit the moyra. If someone is tied then they do not visit the cyril. If someone brachiate the francine and they are assistant then they need the moyra. If someone apportion the cyril then they need the moyra. If the cyril brachiate the francine then the cyril brachiate the moyra. The francine brachiate the moyra.", "logic": "\nAssistant(francine)\nApportion(francine, cyril)\nEqualise(francine, moyra)\nBrachiate(moyra, cyril)\nEqualise(moyra, francine)\nEqualise(moyra, cyril)\nnot Brachiate(cyril, francine)\nforall x (Brachiate(x, moyra) -> Tied(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, moyra) and not Allegretto(x) -> Equalise(x, moyra))\nforall x (Tied(x) -> not Equalise(x, cyril))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, francine) and Assistant(x) -> Brachiate(x, moyra))\nforall x (Apportion(x, cyril) -> Brachiate(x, moyra))\nBrachiate(cyril, francine) -> Brachiate(cyril, moyra)\n\nBrachiate(francine, moyra)\n\nApportion(francine, cyril) and forall x (Apportion(x, cyril) -> Brachiate(x, moyra)) -> therefore Brachiate(francine, moyra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The suzette is bruneian. The suzette bustle the corny. The suzette shield the danita. The danita cashier the corny. The danita shield the suzette. The danita shield the corny. The corny does not need the suzette. If someone cashier the danita then they are convinced. If someone cashier the danita and they are not seafaring then they visit the danita. If someone is convinced then they do not visit the corny. If someone cashier the suzette and they are bruneian then they need the danita. If someone bustle the corny then they need the danita. If the corny cashier the suzette then the corny cashier the danita. The suzette does not need the danita.", "logic": "\nBruneian(suzette)\nBustle(suzette, corny)\nShield(suzette, danita)\nCashier(danita, corny)\nShield(danita, suzette)\nShield(danita, corny)\nnot Cashier(corny, suzette)\nforall x (Cashier(x, danita) -> Convinced(x))\nforall x (Cashier(x, danita) and not Seafaring(x) -> Shield(x, danita))\nforall x (Convinced(x) -> not Shield(x, corny))\nforall x (Cashier(x, suzette) and Bruneian(x) -> Cashier(x, danita))\nforall x (Bustle(x, corny) -> Cashier(x, danita))\nCashier(corny, suzette) -> Cashier(corny, danita)\n\nnot Cashier(suzette, danita)\n\nBustle(suzette, corny) and forall x (Bustle(x, corny) -> Cashier(x, danita)) -> therefore Cashier(suzette, danita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The danica is misshapen. The danica globalize the kayle. The danica skyjack the shaughn. The shaughn catenate the kayle. The shaughn skyjack the danica. The shaughn skyjack the kayle. The kayle does not need the danica. If someone catenate the shaughn then they are canty. If someone catenate the shaughn and they are not debauched then they visit the shaughn. If someone is canty then they do not visit the kayle. If someone catenate the danica and they are misshapen then they need the shaughn. If someone globalize the kayle then they need the shaughn. If the kayle catenate the danica then the kayle catenate the shaughn. The danica is canty.", "logic": "\nMisshapen(danica)\nGlobalize(danica, kayle)\nSkyjack(danica, shaughn)\nCatenate(shaughn, kayle)\nSkyjack(shaughn, danica)\nSkyjack(shaughn, kayle)\nnot Catenate(kayle, danica)\nforall x (Catenate(x, shaughn) -> Canty(x))\nforall x (Catenate(x, shaughn) and not Debauched(x) -> Skyjack(x, shaughn))\nforall x (Canty(x) -> not Skyjack(x, kayle))\nforall x (Catenate(x, danica) and Misshapen(x) -> Catenate(x, shaughn))\nforall x (Globalize(x, kayle) -> Catenate(x, shaughn))\nCatenate(kayle, danica) -> Catenate(kayle, shaughn)\n\nCanty(danica)\n\nGlobalize(danica, kayle) and forall x (Globalize(x, kayle) -> Catenate(x, shaughn)) -> therefore Catenate(danica, shaughn) Catenate(danica, shaughn) and forall x (Catenate(x, shaughn) -> Canty(x)) -> therefore Canty(danica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The shelli is argent. The shelli mythicise the gavriel. The shelli bloviate the kassi. The kassi downgrade the gavriel. The kassi bloviate the shelli. The kassi bloviate the gavriel. The gavriel does not need the shelli. If someone downgrade the kassi then they are insentient. If someone downgrade the kassi and they are not unhearing then they visit the kassi. If someone is insentient then they do not visit the gavriel. If someone downgrade the shelli and they are argent then they need the kassi. If someone mythicise the gavriel then they need the kassi. If the gavriel downgrade the shelli then the gavriel downgrade the kassi. The shelli is not insentient.", "logic": "\nArgent(shelli)\nMythicise(shelli, gavriel)\nBloviate(shelli, kassi)\nDowngrade(kassi, gavriel)\nBloviate(kassi, shelli)\nBloviate(kassi, gavriel)\nnot Downgrade(gavriel, shelli)\nforall x (Downgrade(x, kassi) -> Insentient(x))\nforall x (Downgrade(x, kassi) and not Unhearing(x) -> Bloviate(x, kassi))\nforall x (Insentient(x) -> not Bloviate(x, gavriel))\nforall x (Downgrade(x, shelli) and Argent(x) -> Downgrade(x, kassi))\nforall x (Mythicise(x, gavriel) -> Downgrade(x, kassi))\nDowngrade(gavriel, shelli) -> Downgrade(gavriel, kassi)\n\nnot Insentient(shelli)\n\nMythicise(shelli, gavriel) and forall x (Mythicise(x, gavriel) -> Downgrade(x, kassi)) -> therefore Downgrade(shelli, kassi) Downgrade(shelli, kassi) and forall x (Downgrade(x, kassi) -> Insentient(x)) -> therefore Insentient(shelli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The grove is andalusian. The grove survey the partha. The grove intertwine the theda. The theda graduate the partha. The theda intertwine the grove. The theda intertwine the partha. The partha does not need the grove. If someone graduate the theda then they are mastoidal. If someone graduate the theda and they are not equable then they visit the theda. If someone is mastoidal then they do not visit the partha. If someone graduate the grove and they are andalusian then they need the theda. If someone survey the partha then they need the theda. If the partha graduate the grove then the partha graduate the theda. The grove does not visit the partha.", "logic": "\nAndalusian(grove)\nSurvey(grove, partha)\nIntertwine(grove, theda)\nGraduate(theda, partha)\nIntertwine(theda, grove)\nIntertwine(theda, partha)\nnot Graduate(partha, grove)\nforall x (Graduate(x, theda) -> Mastoidal(x))\nforall x (Graduate(x, theda) and not Equable(x) -> Intertwine(x, theda))\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) -> not Intertwine(x, partha))\nforall x (Graduate(x, grove) and Andalusian(x) -> Graduate(x, theda))\nforall x (Survey(x, partha) -> Graduate(x, theda))\nGraduate(partha, grove) -> Graduate(partha, theda)\n\nnot Intertwine(grove, partha)\n\nSurvey(grove, partha) and forall x (Survey(x, partha) -> Graduate(x, theda)) -> therefore Graduate(grove, theda) Graduate(grove, theda) and forall x (Graduate(x, theda) -> Mastoidal(x)) -> therefore Mastoidal(grove) Mastoidal(grove) and forall x (Mastoidal(x) -> not Intertwine(x, partha)) -> therefore not Intertwine(grove, partha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The bryn is scalloped. The bryn commingle the merrick. The bryn function the suzanne. The suzanne engage the merrick. The suzanne function the bryn. The suzanne function the merrick. The merrick does not need the bryn. If someone engage the suzanne then they are unstable. If someone engage the suzanne and they are not maniac then they visit the suzanne. If someone is unstable then they do not visit the merrick. If someone engage the bryn and they are scalloped then they need the suzanne. If someone commingle the merrick then they need the suzanne. If the merrick engage the bryn then the merrick engage the suzanne. The bryn function the merrick.", "logic": "\nScalloped(bryn)\nCommingle(bryn, merrick)\nFunction(bryn, suzanne)\nEngage(suzanne, merrick)\nFunction(suzanne, bryn)\nFunction(suzanne, merrick)\nnot Engage(merrick, bryn)\nforall x (Engage(x, suzanne) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Engage(x, suzanne) and not Maniac(x) -> Function(x, suzanne))\nforall x (Unstable(x) -> not Function(x, merrick))\nforall x (Engage(x, bryn) and Scalloped(x) -> Engage(x, suzanne))\nforall x (Commingle(x, merrick) -> Engage(x, suzanne))\nEngage(merrick, bryn) -> Engage(merrick, suzanne)\n\nFunction(bryn, merrick)\n\nCommingle(bryn, merrick) and forall x (Commingle(x, merrick) -> Engage(x, suzanne)) -> therefore Engage(bryn, suzanne) Engage(bryn, suzanne) and forall x (Engage(x, suzanne) -> Unstable(x)) -> therefore Unstable(bryn) Unstable(bryn) and forall x (Unstable(x) -> not Function(x, merrick)) -> therefore not Function(bryn, merrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The ned is bunglesome. The ned discharge the katharine. The ned sloganeer the jakob. The jakob hiccup the katharine. The jakob sloganeer the ned. The jakob sloganeer the katharine. The katharine does not need the ned. If someone hiccup the jakob then they are highbrow. If someone hiccup the jakob and they are not uncurved then they visit the jakob. If someone is highbrow then they do not visit the katharine. If someone hiccup the ned and they are bunglesome then they need the jakob. If someone discharge the katharine then they need the jakob. If the katharine hiccup the ned then the katharine hiccup the jakob. The jakob does not need the jakob.", "logic": "\nBunglesome(ned)\nDischarge(ned, katharine)\nSloganeer(ned, jakob)\nHiccup(jakob, katharine)\nSloganeer(jakob, ned)\nSloganeer(jakob, katharine)\nnot Hiccup(katharine, ned)\nforall x (Hiccup(x, jakob) -> Highbrow(x))\nforall x (Hiccup(x, jakob) and not Uncurved(x) -> Sloganeer(x, jakob))\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> not Sloganeer(x, katharine))\nforall x (Hiccup(x, ned) and Bunglesome(x) -> Hiccup(x, jakob))\nforall x (Discharge(x, katharine) -> Hiccup(x, jakob))\nHiccup(katharine, ned) -> Hiccup(katharine, jakob)\n\nnot Hiccup(jakob, jakob)\n\nforall x (Hiccup(x, ned) and Bunglesome(x) -> Hiccup(x, jakob)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The pamela is reformed. The pamela christen the bill. The pamela metricate the tiphany. The tiphany brigade the bill. The tiphany metricate the pamela. The tiphany metricate the bill. The bill does not need the pamela. If someone brigade the tiphany then they are pupillary. If someone brigade the tiphany and they are not weighted then they visit the tiphany. If someone is pupillary then they do not visit the bill. If someone brigade the pamela and they are reformed then they need the tiphany. If someone christen the bill then they need the tiphany. If the bill brigade the pamela then the bill brigade the tiphany. The bill metricate the tiphany.", "logic": "\nReformed(pamela)\nChristen(pamela, bill)\nMetricate(pamela, tiphany)\nBrigade(tiphany, bill)\nMetricate(tiphany, pamela)\nMetricate(tiphany, bill)\nnot Brigade(bill, pamela)\nforall x (Brigade(x, tiphany) -> Pupillary(x))\nforall x (Brigade(x, tiphany) and not Weighted(x) -> Metricate(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Pupillary(x) -> not Metricate(x, bill))\nforall x (Brigade(x, pamela) and Reformed(x) -> Brigade(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Christen(x, bill) -> Brigade(x, tiphany))\nBrigade(bill, pamela) -> Brigade(bill, tiphany)\n\nMetricate(bill, tiphany)\n\nforall x (Brigade(x, tiphany) and not Weighted(x) -> Metricate(x, tiphany)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The warren is trophic. The warren uniformize the flem. The warren mushroom the auroora. The auroora shoal the flem. The auroora mushroom the warren. The auroora mushroom the flem. The flem does not need the warren. If someone shoal the auroora then they are veinlike. If someone shoal the auroora and they are not seasick then they visit the auroora. If someone is veinlike then they do not visit the flem. If someone shoal the warren and they are trophic then they need the auroora. If someone uniformize the flem then they need the auroora. If the flem shoal the warren then the flem shoal the auroora. The auroora is not veinlike.", "logic": "\nTrophic(warren)\nUniformize(warren, flem)\nMushroom(warren, auroora)\nShoal(auroora, flem)\nMushroom(auroora, warren)\nMushroom(auroora, flem)\nnot Shoal(flem, warren)\nforall x (Shoal(x, auroora) -> Veinlike(x))\nforall x (Shoal(x, auroora) and not Seasick(x) -> Mushroom(x, auroora))\nforall x (Veinlike(x) -> not Mushroom(x, flem))\nforall x (Shoal(x, warren) and Trophic(x) -> Shoal(x, auroora))\nforall x (Uniformize(x, flem) -> Shoal(x, auroora))\nShoal(flem, warren) -> Shoal(flem, auroora)\n\nnot Veinlike(auroora)\n\nforall x (Shoal(x, auroora) -> Veinlike(x)) <- forall x (Shoal(x, warren) and Trophic(x) -> Shoal(x, auroora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The ray is unbowed. The ray literalise the milton. The ray glow the corri. The corri adjoin the milton. The corri glow the ray. The corri glow the milton. The milton does not need the ray. If someone adjoin the corri then they are ceylonese. If someone adjoin the corri and they are not alleged then they visit the corri. If someone is ceylonese then they do not visit the milton. If someone adjoin the ray and they are unbowed then they need the corri. If someone literalise the milton then they need the corri. If the milton adjoin the ray then the milton adjoin the corri. The corri glow the corri.", "logic": "\nUnbowed(ray)\nLiteralise(ray, milton)\nGlow(ray, corri)\nAdjoin(corri, milton)\nGlow(corri, ray)\nGlow(corri, milton)\nnot Adjoin(milton, ray)\nforall x (Adjoin(x, corri) -> Ceylonese(x))\nforall x (Adjoin(x, corri) and not Alleged(x) -> Glow(x, corri))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) -> not Glow(x, milton))\nforall x (Adjoin(x, ray) and Unbowed(x) -> Adjoin(x, corri))\nforall x (Literalise(x, milton) -> Adjoin(x, corri))\nAdjoin(milton, ray) -> Adjoin(milton, corri)\n\nGlow(corri, corri)\n\nforall x (Adjoin(x, corri) and not Alleged(x) -> Glow(x, corri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The ilsa is idyllic. The ilsa polymerise the pammie. The ilsa dissemble the nerte. The nerte julienne the pammie. The nerte dissemble the ilsa. The nerte dissemble the pammie. The pammie does not need the ilsa. If someone julienne the nerte then they are disguised. If someone julienne the nerte and they are not starving then they visit the nerte. If someone is disguised then they do not visit the pammie. If someone julienne the ilsa and they are idyllic then they need the nerte. If someone polymerise the pammie then they need the nerte. If the pammie julienne the ilsa then the pammie julienne the nerte. The pammie does not visit the ilsa.", "logic": "\nIdyllic(ilsa)\nPolymerise(ilsa, pammie)\nDissemble(ilsa, nerte)\nJulienne(nerte, pammie)\nDissemble(nerte, ilsa)\nDissemble(nerte, pammie)\nnot Julienne(pammie, ilsa)\nforall x (Julienne(x, nerte) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Julienne(x, nerte) and not Starving(x) -> Dissemble(x, nerte))\nforall x (Disguised(x) -> not Dissemble(x, pammie))\nforall x (Julienne(x, ilsa) and Idyllic(x) -> Julienne(x, nerte))\nforall x (Polymerise(x, pammie) -> Julienne(x, nerte))\nJulienne(pammie, ilsa) -> Julienne(pammie, nerte)\n\nnot Dissemble(pammie, ilsa)\n\nnot Dissemble(pammie, ilsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The milena is bronzy. The milena bruit the corliss. The milena agitate the griswold. The griswold jilt the corliss. The griswold agitate the milena. The griswold agitate the corliss. The corliss does not need the milena. If someone jilt the griswold then they are momentous. If someone jilt the griswold and they are not protected then they visit the griswold. If someone is momentous then they do not visit the corliss. If someone jilt the milena and they are bronzy then they need the griswold. If someone bruit the corliss then they need the griswold. If the corliss jilt the milena then the corliss jilt the griswold. The griswold bruit the milena.", "logic": "\nBronzy(milena)\nBruit(milena, corliss)\nAgitate(milena, griswold)\nJilt(griswold, corliss)\nAgitate(griswold, milena)\nAgitate(griswold, corliss)\nnot Jilt(corliss, milena)\nforall x (Jilt(x, griswold) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Jilt(x, griswold) and not Protected(x) -> Agitate(x, griswold))\nforall x (Momentous(x) -> not Agitate(x, corliss))\nforall x (Jilt(x, milena) and Bronzy(x) -> Jilt(x, griswold))\nforall x (Bruit(x, corliss) -> Jilt(x, griswold))\nJilt(corliss, milena) -> Jilt(corliss, griswold)\n\nBruit(griswold, milena)\n\nBruit(griswold, milena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The elyse is whipping. The elyse change the willie. The elyse pupate the velvet. The velvet regularise the willie. The velvet pupate the elyse. The velvet pupate the willie. The willie does not need the elyse. If someone regularise the velvet then they are crookback. If someone regularise the velvet and they are not touristed then they visit the velvet. If someone is crookback then they do not visit the willie. If someone regularise the elyse and they are whipping then they need the velvet. If someone change the willie then they need the velvet. If the willie regularise the elyse then the willie regularise the velvet. The elyse is not touristed.", "logic": "\nWhipping(elyse)\nChange(elyse, willie)\nPupate(elyse, velvet)\nRegularise(velvet, willie)\nPupate(velvet, elyse)\nPupate(velvet, willie)\nnot Regularise(willie, elyse)\nforall x (Regularise(x, velvet) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Regularise(x, velvet) and not Touristed(x) -> Pupate(x, velvet))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> not Pupate(x, willie))\nforall x (Regularise(x, elyse) and Whipping(x) -> Regularise(x, velvet))\nforall x (Change(x, willie) -> Regularise(x, velvet))\nRegularise(willie, elyse) -> Regularise(willie, velvet)\n\nnot Touristed(elyse)\n\nnot Touristed(elyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The gerrard is subjacent. The gerrard soak the conny. The gerrard miscall the preston. The preston switch the conny. The preston miscall the gerrard. The preston miscall the conny. The conny does not need the gerrard. If someone switch the preston then they are exothermal. If someone switch the preston and they are not peckish then they visit the preston. If someone is exothermal then they do not visit the conny. If someone switch the gerrard and they are subjacent then they need the preston. If someone soak the conny then they need the preston. If the conny switch the gerrard then the conny switch the preston. The conny soak the conny.", "logic": "\nSubjacent(gerrard)\nSoak(gerrard, conny)\nMiscall(gerrard, preston)\nSwitch(preston, conny)\nMiscall(preston, gerrard)\nMiscall(preston, conny)\nnot Switch(conny, gerrard)\nforall x (Switch(x, preston) -> Exothermal(x))\nforall x (Switch(x, preston) and not Peckish(x) -> Miscall(x, preston))\nforall x (Exothermal(x) -> not Miscall(x, conny))\nforall x (Switch(x, gerrard) and Subjacent(x) -> Switch(x, preston))\nforall x (Soak(x, conny) -> Switch(x, preston))\nSwitch(conny, gerrard) -> Switch(conny, preston)\n\nSoak(conny, conny)\n\nSoak(conny, conny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The adlai is lengthwise. The adlai is plumbic. The adlai sniff the elka. The adlai sniff the caro. The adlai nutate the elka. The adlai nutate the caro. The elka is affable. The elka is euphonical. The elka is concluded. The elka sniff the adlai. The elka nutate the adlai. The caro is affable. The caro sniff the adlai. The caro sniff the elka. The caro nutate the elka. If the caro nutate the adlai then the adlai complain the caro. If something nutate the elka then it is plumbic. If the elka is plumbic and the elka is concluded then the elka nutate the adlai. If something is plumbic and it sniff the elka then it nutate the adlai. If something is plumbic and it complain the elka then it nutate the caro. If something sniff the elka then it complain the elka. The adlai is lengthwise.", "logic": "\nLengthwise(adlai)\nPlumbic(adlai)\nSniff(adlai, elka)\nSniff(adlai, caro)\nNutate(adlai, elka)\nNutate(adlai, caro)\nAffable(elka)\nEuphonical(elka)\nConcluded(elka)\nSniff(elka, adlai)\nNutate(elka, adlai)\nAffable(caro)\nSniff(caro, adlai)\nSniff(caro, elka)\nNutate(caro, elka)\nNutate(caro, adlai) -> Complain(adlai, caro)\nforall x (Nutate(x, elka) -> Plumbic(x))\nPlumbic(elka) and Concluded(elka) -> Nutate(elka, adlai)\nforall x (Plumbic(x) and Sniff(x, elka) -> Nutate(x, adlai))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) and Complain(x, elka) -> Nutate(x, caro))\nforall x (Sniff(x, elka) -> Complain(x, elka))\n\nLengthwise(adlai)\n\ntherefore Lengthwise(adlai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The miles is foremost. The miles is wifely. The miles mooch the felicio. The miles mooch the janine. The miles etherify the felicio. The miles etherify the janine. The felicio is algerian. The felicio is abroad. The felicio is anoxemic. The felicio mooch the miles. The felicio etherify the miles. The janine is algerian. The janine mooch the miles. The janine mooch the felicio. The janine etherify the felicio. If the janine etherify the miles then the miles dilate the janine. If something etherify the felicio then it is wifely. If the felicio is wifely and the felicio is anoxemic then the felicio etherify the miles. If something is wifely and it mooch the felicio then it etherify the miles. If something is wifely and it dilate the felicio then it etherify the janine. If something mooch the felicio then it dilate the felicio. The felicio does not see the miles.", "logic": "\nForemost(miles)\nWifely(miles)\nMooch(miles, felicio)\nMooch(miles, janine)\nEtherify(miles, felicio)\nEtherify(miles, janine)\nAlgerian(felicio)\nAbroad(felicio)\nAnoxemic(felicio)\nMooch(felicio, miles)\nEtherify(felicio, miles)\nAlgerian(janine)\nMooch(janine, miles)\nMooch(janine, felicio)\nEtherify(janine, felicio)\nEtherify(janine, miles) -> Dilate(miles, janine)\nforall x (Etherify(x, felicio) -> Wifely(x))\nWifely(felicio) and Anoxemic(felicio) -> Etherify(felicio, miles)\nforall x (Wifely(x) and Mooch(x, felicio) -> Etherify(x, miles))\nforall x (Wifely(x) and Dilate(x, felicio) -> Etherify(x, janine))\nforall x (Mooch(x, felicio) -> Dilate(x, felicio))\n\nnot Etherify(felicio, miles)\n\ntherefore Etherify(felicio, miles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The graeme is yearly. The graeme is shakable. The graeme withdraw the elyn. The graeme withdraw the valentina. The graeme brooch the elyn. The graeme brooch the valentina. The elyn is validating. The elyn is educative. The elyn is ismaili. The elyn withdraw the graeme. The elyn brooch the graeme. The valentina is validating. The valentina withdraw the graeme. The valentina withdraw the elyn. The valentina brooch the elyn. If the valentina brooch the graeme then the graeme swagger the valentina. If something brooch the elyn then it is shakable. If the elyn is shakable and the elyn is ismaili then the elyn brooch the graeme. If something is shakable and it withdraw the elyn then it brooch the graeme. If something is shakable and it swagger the elyn then it brooch the valentina. If something withdraw the elyn then it swagger the elyn. The valentina swagger the elyn.", "logic": "\nYearly(graeme)\nShakable(graeme)\nWithdraw(graeme, elyn)\nWithdraw(graeme, valentina)\nBrooch(graeme, elyn)\nBrooch(graeme, valentina)\nValidating(elyn)\nEducative(elyn)\nIsmaili(elyn)\nWithdraw(elyn, graeme)\nBrooch(elyn, graeme)\nValidating(valentina)\nWithdraw(valentina, graeme)\nWithdraw(valentina, elyn)\nBrooch(valentina, elyn)\nBrooch(valentina, graeme) -> Swagger(graeme, valentina)\nforall x (Brooch(x, elyn) -> Shakable(x))\nShakable(elyn) and Ismaili(elyn) -> Brooch(elyn, graeme)\nforall x (Shakable(x) and Withdraw(x, elyn) -> Brooch(x, graeme))\nforall x (Shakable(x) and Swagger(x, elyn) -> Brooch(x, valentina))\nforall x (Withdraw(x, elyn) -> Swagger(x, elyn))\n\nSwagger(valentina, elyn)\n\nWithdraw(valentina, elyn) and forall x (Withdraw(x, elyn) -> Swagger(x, elyn)) -> therefore Swagger(valentina, elyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The lucille is curtained. The lucille is fetid. The lucille disinter the rollin. The lucille disinter the alysa. The lucille razor the rollin. The lucille razor the alysa. The rollin is centennial. The rollin is gambian. The rollin is raining. The rollin disinter the lucille. The rollin razor the lucille. The alysa is centennial. The alysa disinter the lucille. The alysa disinter the rollin. The alysa razor the rollin. If the alysa razor the lucille then the lucille caulk the alysa. If something razor the rollin then it is fetid. If the rollin is fetid and the rollin is raining then the rollin razor the lucille. If something is fetid and it disinter the rollin then it razor the lucille. If something is fetid and it caulk the rollin then it razor the alysa. If something disinter the rollin then it caulk the rollin. The alysa does not visit the rollin.", "logic": "\nCurtained(lucille)\nFetid(lucille)\nDisinter(lucille, rollin)\nDisinter(lucille, alysa)\nRazor(lucille, rollin)\nRazor(lucille, alysa)\nCentennial(rollin)\nGambian(rollin)\nRaining(rollin)\nDisinter(rollin, lucille)\nRazor(rollin, lucille)\nCentennial(alysa)\nDisinter(alysa, lucille)\nDisinter(alysa, rollin)\nRazor(alysa, rollin)\nRazor(alysa, lucille) -> Caulk(lucille, alysa)\nforall x (Razor(x, rollin) -> Fetid(x))\nFetid(rollin) and Raining(rollin) -> Razor(rollin, lucille)\nforall x (Fetid(x) and Disinter(x, rollin) -> Razor(x, lucille))\nforall x (Fetid(x) and Caulk(x, rollin) -> Razor(x, alysa))\nforall x (Disinter(x, rollin) -> Caulk(x, rollin))\n\nnot Caulk(alysa, rollin)\n\nDisinter(alysa, rollin) and forall x (Disinter(x, rollin) -> Caulk(x, rollin)) -> therefore Caulk(alysa, rollin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The gaspar is vulpecular. The gaspar is genitive. The gaspar canalise the maya. The gaspar canalise the barbi. The gaspar goose the maya. The gaspar goose the barbi. The maya is voluptuary. The maya is unreadable. The maya is changeable. The maya canalise the gaspar. The maya goose the gaspar. The barbi is voluptuary. The barbi canalise the gaspar. The barbi canalise the maya. The barbi goose the maya. If the barbi goose the gaspar then the gaspar convoy the barbi. If something goose the maya then it is genitive. If the maya is genitive and the maya is changeable then the maya goose the gaspar. If something is genitive and it canalise the maya then it goose the gaspar. If something is genitive and it convoy the maya then it goose the barbi. If something canalise the maya then it convoy the maya. The barbi goose the gaspar.", "logic": "\nVulpecular(gaspar)\nGenitive(gaspar)\nCanalise(gaspar, maya)\nCanalise(gaspar, barbi)\nGoose(gaspar, maya)\nGoose(gaspar, barbi)\nVoluptuary(maya)\nUnreadable(maya)\nChangeable(maya)\nCanalise(maya, gaspar)\nGoose(maya, gaspar)\nVoluptuary(barbi)\nCanalise(barbi, gaspar)\nCanalise(barbi, maya)\nGoose(barbi, maya)\nGoose(barbi, gaspar) -> Convoy(gaspar, barbi)\nforall x (Goose(x, maya) -> Genitive(x))\nGenitive(maya) and Changeable(maya) -> Goose(maya, gaspar)\nforall x (Genitive(x) and Canalise(x, maya) -> Goose(x, gaspar))\nforall x (Genitive(x) and Convoy(x, maya) -> Goose(x, barbi))\nforall x (Canalise(x, maya) -> Convoy(x, maya))\n\nGoose(barbi, gaspar)\n\nGoose(barbi, maya) and forall x (Goose(x, maya) -> Genitive(x)) -> therefore Genitive(barbi) Genitive(barbi) and Canalise(barbi, maya) and forall x (Genitive(x) and Canalise(x, maya) -> Goose(x, gaspar)) -> therefore Goose(barbi, gaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The angelique is tenfold. The angelique is monotonic. The angelique anathemise the hilliary. The angelique anathemise the mayor. The angelique trammel the hilliary. The angelique trammel the mayor. The hilliary is gelded. The hilliary is drinkable. The hilliary is attested. The hilliary anathemise the angelique. The hilliary trammel the angelique. The mayor is gelded. The mayor anathemise the angelique. The mayor anathemise the hilliary. The mayor trammel the hilliary. If the mayor trammel the angelique then the angelique slack the mayor. If something trammel the hilliary then it is monotonic. If the hilliary is monotonic and the hilliary is attested then the hilliary trammel the angelique. If something is monotonic and it anathemise the hilliary then it trammel the angelique. If something is monotonic and it slack the hilliary then it trammel the mayor. If something anathemise the hilliary then it slack the hilliary. The mayor does not see the mayor.", "logic": "\nTenfold(angelique)\nMonotonic(angelique)\nAnathemise(angelique, hilliary)\nAnathemise(angelique, mayor)\nTrammel(angelique, hilliary)\nTrammel(angelique, mayor)\nGelded(hilliary)\nDrinkable(hilliary)\nAttested(hilliary)\nAnathemise(hilliary, angelique)\nTrammel(hilliary, angelique)\nGelded(mayor)\nAnathemise(mayor, angelique)\nAnathemise(mayor, hilliary)\nTrammel(mayor, hilliary)\nTrammel(mayor, angelique) -> Slack(angelique, mayor)\nforall x (Trammel(x, hilliary) -> Monotonic(x))\nMonotonic(hilliary) and Attested(hilliary) -> Trammel(hilliary, angelique)\nforall x (Monotonic(x) and Anathemise(x, hilliary) -> Trammel(x, angelique))\nforall x (Monotonic(x) and Slack(x, hilliary) -> Trammel(x, mayor))\nforall x (Anathemise(x, hilliary) -> Slack(x, hilliary))\n\nnot Trammel(mayor, mayor)\n\nTrammel(mayor, hilliary) and forall x (Trammel(x, hilliary) -> Monotonic(x)) -> therefore Monotonic(mayor) Anathemise(mayor, hilliary) and forall x (Anathemise(x, hilliary) -> Slack(x, hilliary)) -> therefore Slack(mayor, hilliary) Monotonic(mayor) and Slack(mayor, hilliary) and forall x (Monotonic(x) and Slack(x, hilliary) -> Trammel(x, mayor)) -> therefore Trammel(mayor, mayor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The emylee is sunk. The emylee is unsociable. The emylee breathe the blinny. The emylee breathe the kristos. The emylee paginate the blinny. The emylee paginate the kristos. The blinny is bovid. The blinny is mitigated. The blinny is unliterary. The blinny breathe the emylee. The blinny paginate the emylee. The kristos is bovid. The kristos breathe the emylee. The kristos breathe the blinny. The kristos paginate the blinny. If the kristos paginate the emylee then the emylee exposit the kristos. If something paginate the blinny then it is unsociable. If the blinny is unsociable and the blinny is unliterary then the blinny paginate the emylee. If something is unsociable and it breathe the blinny then it paginate the emylee. If something is unsociable and it exposit the blinny then it paginate the kristos. If something breathe the blinny then it exposit the blinny. The emylee exposit the kristos.", "logic": "\nSunk(emylee)\nUnsociable(emylee)\nBreathe(emylee, blinny)\nBreathe(emylee, kristos)\nPaginate(emylee, blinny)\nPaginate(emylee, kristos)\nBovid(blinny)\nMitigated(blinny)\nUnliterary(blinny)\nBreathe(blinny, emylee)\nPaginate(blinny, emylee)\nBovid(kristos)\nBreathe(kristos, emylee)\nBreathe(kristos, blinny)\nPaginate(kristos, blinny)\nPaginate(kristos, emylee) -> Exposit(emylee, kristos)\nforall x (Paginate(x, blinny) -> Unsociable(x))\nUnsociable(blinny) and Unliterary(blinny) -> Paginate(blinny, emylee)\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Breathe(x, blinny) -> Paginate(x, emylee))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Exposit(x, blinny) -> Paginate(x, kristos))\nforall x (Breathe(x, blinny) -> Exposit(x, blinny))\n\nExposit(emylee, kristos)\n\nPaginate(kristos, blinny) and forall x (Paginate(x, blinny) -> Unsociable(x)) -> therefore Unsociable(kristos) Unsociable(kristos) and Breathe(kristos, blinny) and forall x (Unsociable(x) and Breathe(x, blinny) -> Paginate(x, emylee)) -> therefore Paginate(kristos, emylee) Paginate(kristos, emylee) and Paginate(kristos, emylee) -> Exposit(emylee, kristos) -> therefore Exposit(emylee, kristos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The velma is vented. The velma is stygian. The velma mimic the verney. The velma mimic the walsh. The velma lunge the verney. The velma lunge the walsh. The verney is xlvii. The verney is decadent. The verney is inebriated. The verney mimic the velma. The verney lunge the velma. The walsh is xlvii. The walsh mimic the velma. The walsh mimic the verney. The walsh lunge the verney. If the walsh lunge the velma then the velma complect the walsh. If something lunge the verney then it is stygian. If the verney is stygian and the verney is inebriated then the verney lunge the velma. If something is stygian and it mimic the verney then it lunge the velma. If something is stygian and it complect the verney then it lunge the walsh. If something mimic the verney then it complect the verney. The velma does not visit the walsh.", "logic": "\nVented(velma)\nStygian(velma)\nMimic(velma, verney)\nMimic(velma, walsh)\nLunge(velma, verney)\nLunge(velma, walsh)\nXlvii(verney)\nDecadent(verney)\nInebriated(verney)\nMimic(verney, velma)\nLunge(verney, velma)\nXlvii(walsh)\nMimic(walsh, velma)\nMimic(walsh, verney)\nLunge(walsh, verney)\nLunge(walsh, velma) -> Complect(velma, walsh)\nforall x (Lunge(x, verney) -> Stygian(x))\nStygian(verney) and Inebriated(verney) -> Lunge(verney, velma)\nforall x (Stygian(x) and Mimic(x, verney) -> Lunge(x, velma))\nforall x (Stygian(x) and Complect(x, verney) -> Lunge(x, walsh))\nforall x (Mimic(x, verney) -> Complect(x, verney))\n\nnot Complect(velma, walsh)\n\nLunge(walsh, verney) and forall x (Lunge(x, verney) -> Stygian(x)) -> therefore Stygian(walsh) Stygian(walsh) and Mimic(walsh, verney) and forall x (Stygian(x) and Mimic(x, verney) -> Lunge(x, velma)) -> therefore Lunge(walsh, velma) Lunge(walsh, velma) and Lunge(walsh, velma) -> Complect(velma, walsh) -> therefore Complect(velma, walsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The hilton is clattery. The hilton is curative. The hilton assonate the stern. The hilton assonate the terina. The hilton dovetail the stern. The hilton dovetail the terina. The stern is compounded. The stern is attempted. The stern is censorial. The stern assonate the hilton. The stern dovetail the hilton. The terina is compounded. The terina assonate the hilton. The terina assonate the stern. The terina dovetail the stern. If the terina dovetail the hilton then the hilton peep the terina. If something dovetail the stern then it is curative. If the stern is curative and the stern is censorial then the stern dovetail the hilton. If something is curative and it assonate the stern then it dovetail the hilton. If something is curative and it peep the stern then it dovetail the terina. If something assonate the stern then it peep the stern. The stern does not visit the stern.", "logic": "\nClattery(hilton)\nCurative(hilton)\nAssonate(hilton, stern)\nAssonate(hilton, terina)\nDovetail(hilton, stern)\nDovetail(hilton, terina)\nCompounded(stern)\nAttempted(stern)\nCensorial(stern)\nAssonate(stern, hilton)\nDovetail(stern, hilton)\nCompounded(terina)\nAssonate(terina, hilton)\nAssonate(terina, stern)\nDovetail(terina, stern)\nDovetail(terina, hilton) -> Peep(hilton, terina)\nforall x (Dovetail(x, stern) -> Curative(x))\nCurative(stern) and Censorial(stern) -> Dovetail(stern, hilton)\nforall x (Curative(x) and Assonate(x, stern) -> Dovetail(x, hilton))\nforall x (Curative(x) and Peep(x, stern) -> Dovetail(x, terina))\nforall x (Assonate(x, stern) -> Peep(x, stern))\n\nnot Peep(stern, stern)\n\nforall x (Assonate(x, stern) -> Peep(x, stern)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The reube is oafish. The reube is amendable. The reube revenge the elias. The reube revenge the catarina. The reube exhibit the elias. The reube exhibit the catarina. The elias is exacting. The elias is dutiful. The elias is acropetal. The elias revenge the reube. The elias exhibit the reube. The catarina is exacting. The catarina revenge the reube. The catarina revenge the elias. The catarina exhibit the elias. If the catarina exhibit the reube then the reube torture the catarina. If something exhibit the elias then it is amendable. If the elias is amendable and the elias is acropetal then the elias exhibit the reube. If something is amendable and it revenge the elias then it exhibit the reube. If something is amendable and it torture the elias then it exhibit the catarina. If something revenge the elias then it torture the elias. The elias exhibit the catarina.", "logic": "\nOafish(reube)\nAmendable(reube)\nRevenge(reube, elias)\nRevenge(reube, catarina)\nExhibit(reube, elias)\nExhibit(reube, catarina)\nExacting(elias)\nDutiful(elias)\nAcropetal(elias)\nRevenge(elias, reube)\nExhibit(elias, reube)\nExacting(catarina)\nRevenge(catarina, reube)\nRevenge(catarina, elias)\nExhibit(catarina, elias)\nExhibit(catarina, reube) -> Torture(reube, catarina)\nforall x (Exhibit(x, elias) -> Amendable(x))\nAmendable(elias) and Acropetal(elias) -> Exhibit(elias, reube)\nforall x (Amendable(x) and Revenge(x, elias) -> Exhibit(x, reube))\nforall x (Amendable(x) and Torture(x, elias) -> Exhibit(x, catarina))\nforall x (Revenge(x, elias) -> Torture(x, elias))\n\nExhibit(elias, catarina)\n\nforall x (Amendable(x) and Torture(x, elias) -> Exhibit(x, catarina)) <- forall x (Exhibit(x, elias) -> Amendable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The austine is continuous. The austine is missed. The austine bloviate the felisha. The austine bloviate the kaitlyn. The austine remember the felisha. The austine remember the kaitlyn. The felisha is attachable. The felisha is melting. The felisha is antipodean. The felisha bloviate the austine. The felisha remember the austine. The kaitlyn is attachable. The kaitlyn bloviate the austine. The kaitlyn bloviate the felisha. The kaitlyn remember the felisha. If the kaitlyn remember the austine then the austine ponder the kaitlyn. If something remember the felisha then it is missed. If the felisha is missed and the felisha is antipodean then the felisha remember the austine. If something is missed and it bloviate the felisha then it remember the austine. If something is missed and it ponder the felisha then it remember the kaitlyn. If something bloviate the felisha then it ponder the felisha. The felisha is not missed.", "logic": "\nContinuous(austine)\nMissed(austine)\nBloviate(austine, felisha)\nBloviate(austine, kaitlyn)\nRemember(austine, felisha)\nRemember(austine, kaitlyn)\nAttachable(felisha)\nMelting(felisha)\nAntipodean(felisha)\nBloviate(felisha, austine)\nRemember(felisha, austine)\nAttachable(kaitlyn)\nBloviate(kaitlyn, austine)\nBloviate(kaitlyn, felisha)\nRemember(kaitlyn, felisha)\nRemember(kaitlyn, austine) -> Ponder(austine, kaitlyn)\nforall x (Remember(x, felisha) -> Missed(x))\nMissed(felisha) and Antipodean(felisha) -> Remember(felisha, austine)\nforall x (Missed(x) and Bloviate(x, felisha) -> Remember(x, austine))\nforall x (Missed(x) and Ponder(x, felisha) -> Remember(x, kaitlyn))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, felisha) -> Ponder(x, felisha))\n\nnot Missed(felisha)\n\nforall x (Remember(x, felisha) -> Missed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The laetitia is intrusive. The laetitia is anchoritic. The laetitia pinch the ricky. The laetitia pinch the wilt. The laetitia pink the ricky. The laetitia pink the wilt. The ricky is pastoral. The ricky is receptive. The ricky is censored. The ricky pinch the laetitia. The ricky pink the laetitia. The wilt is pastoral. The wilt pinch the laetitia. The wilt pinch the ricky. The wilt pink the ricky. If the wilt pink the laetitia then the laetitia complect the wilt. If something pink the ricky then it is anchoritic. If the ricky is anchoritic and the ricky is censored then the ricky pink the laetitia. If something is anchoritic and it pinch the ricky then it pink the laetitia. If something is anchoritic and it complect the ricky then it pink the wilt. If something pinch the ricky then it complect the ricky. The wilt is intrusive.", "logic": "\nIntrusive(laetitia)\nAnchoritic(laetitia)\nPinch(laetitia, ricky)\nPinch(laetitia, wilt)\nPink(laetitia, ricky)\nPink(laetitia, wilt)\nPastoral(ricky)\nReceptive(ricky)\nCensored(ricky)\nPinch(ricky, laetitia)\nPink(ricky, laetitia)\nPastoral(wilt)\nPinch(wilt, laetitia)\nPinch(wilt, ricky)\nPink(wilt, ricky)\nPink(wilt, laetitia) -> Complect(laetitia, wilt)\nforall x (Pink(x, ricky) -> Anchoritic(x))\nAnchoritic(ricky) and Censored(ricky) -> Pink(ricky, laetitia)\nforall x (Anchoritic(x) and Pinch(x, ricky) -> Pink(x, laetitia))\nforall x (Anchoritic(x) and Complect(x, ricky) -> Pink(x, wilt))\nforall x (Pinch(x, ricky) -> Complect(x, ricky))\n\nIntrusive(wilt)\n\nIntrusive(wilt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The annmaria is saxatile. The annmaria is zesty. The annmaria photostat the rosalind. The annmaria photostat the manon. The annmaria incline the rosalind. The annmaria incline the manon. The rosalind is satiable. The rosalind is dimorphic. The rosalind is especial. The rosalind photostat the annmaria. The rosalind incline the annmaria. The manon is satiable. The manon photostat the annmaria. The manon photostat the rosalind. The manon incline the rosalind. If the manon incline the annmaria then the annmaria proceed the manon. If something incline the rosalind then it is zesty. If the rosalind is zesty and the rosalind is especial then the rosalind incline the annmaria. If something is zesty and it photostat the rosalind then it incline the annmaria. If something is zesty and it proceed the rosalind then it incline the manon. If something photostat the rosalind then it proceed the rosalind. The annmaria is not dimorphic.", "logic": "\nSaxatile(annmaria)\nZesty(annmaria)\nPhotostat(annmaria, rosalind)\nPhotostat(annmaria, manon)\nIncline(annmaria, rosalind)\nIncline(annmaria, manon)\nSatiable(rosalind)\nDimorphic(rosalind)\nEspecial(rosalind)\nPhotostat(rosalind, annmaria)\nIncline(rosalind, annmaria)\nSatiable(manon)\nPhotostat(manon, annmaria)\nPhotostat(manon, rosalind)\nIncline(manon, rosalind)\nIncline(manon, annmaria) -> Proceed(annmaria, manon)\nforall x (Incline(x, rosalind) -> Zesty(x))\nZesty(rosalind) and Especial(rosalind) -> Incline(rosalind, annmaria)\nforall x (Zesty(x) and Photostat(x, rosalind) -> Incline(x, annmaria))\nforall x (Zesty(x) and Proceed(x, rosalind) -> Incline(x, manon))\nforall x (Photostat(x, rosalind) -> Proceed(x, rosalind))\n\nnot Dimorphic(annmaria)\n\nnot Dimorphic(annmaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The eveleen is biddable. The eveleen is idiopathic. The eveleen dialyse the korrie. The eveleen dialyse the nichols. The eveleen stable the korrie. The eveleen stable the nichols. The korrie is bullocky. The korrie is wound. The korrie is rejected. The korrie dialyse the eveleen. The korrie stable the eveleen. The nichols is bullocky. The nichols dialyse the eveleen. The nichols dialyse the korrie. The nichols stable the korrie. If the nichols stable the eveleen then the eveleen kayak the nichols. If something stable the korrie then it is idiopathic. If the korrie is idiopathic and the korrie is rejected then the korrie stable the eveleen. If something is idiopathic and it dialyse the korrie then it stable the eveleen. If something is idiopathic and it kayak the korrie then it stable the nichols. If something dialyse the korrie then it kayak the korrie. The nichols kayak the eveleen.", "logic": "\nBiddable(eveleen)\nIdiopathic(eveleen)\nDialyse(eveleen, korrie)\nDialyse(eveleen, nichols)\nStable(eveleen, korrie)\nStable(eveleen, nichols)\nBullocky(korrie)\nWound(korrie)\nRejected(korrie)\nDialyse(korrie, eveleen)\nStable(korrie, eveleen)\nBullocky(nichols)\nDialyse(nichols, eveleen)\nDialyse(nichols, korrie)\nStable(nichols, korrie)\nStable(nichols, eveleen) -> Kayak(eveleen, nichols)\nforall x (Stable(x, korrie) -> Idiopathic(x))\nIdiopathic(korrie) and Rejected(korrie) -> Stable(korrie, eveleen)\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) and Dialyse(x, korrie) -> Stable(x, eveleen))\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) and Kayak(x, korrie) -> Stable(x, nichols))\nforall x (Dialyse(x, korrie) -> Kayak(x, korrie))\n\nKayak(nichols, eveleen)\n\nKayak(nichols, eveleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The kylen is follicular. The kylen is sexual. The kylen stub the gerome. The kylen stub the lazar. The kylen shear the gerome. The kylen shear the lazar. The gerome is unpointed. The gerome is iridescent. The gerome is opened. The gerome stub the kylen. The gerome shear the kylen. The lazar is unpointed. The lazar stub the kylen. The lazar stub the gerome. The lazar shear the gerome. If the lazar shear the kylen then the kylen eternize the lazar. If something shear the gerome then it is sexual. If the gerome is sexual and the gerome is opened then the gerome shear the kylen. If something is sexual and it stub the gerome then it shear the kylen. If something is sexual and it eternize the gerome then it shear the lazar. If something stub the gerome then it eternize the gerome. The gerome does not need the lazar.", "logic": "\nFollicular(kylen)\nSexual(kylen)\nStub(kylen, gerome)\nStub(kylen, lazar)\nShear(kylen, gerome)\nShear(kylen, lazar)\nUnpointed(gerome)\nIridescent(gerome)\nOpened(gerome)\nStub(gerome, kylen)\nShear(gerome, kylen)\nUnpointed(lazar)\nStub(lazar, kylen)\nStub(lazar, gerome)\nShear(lazar, gerome)\nShear(lazar, kylen) -> Eternize(kylen, lazar)\nforall x (Shear(x, gerome) -> Sexual(x))\nSexual(gerome) and Opened(gerome) -> Shear(gerome, kylen)\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Stub(x, gerome) -> Shear(x, kylen))\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Eternize(x, gerome) -> Shear(x, lazar))\nforall x (Stub(x, gerome) -> Eternize(x, gerome))\n\nnot Stub(gerome, lazar)\n\nnot Stub(gerome, lazar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The roice is intended. The roice is ecological. The roice replete the madona. The roice replete the clarette. The roice sorcerize the madona. The roice sorcerize the clarette. The madona is bimonthly. The madona is lendable. The madona is unobserved. The madona replete the roice. The madona sorcerize the roice. The clarette is bimonthly. The clarette replete the roice. The clarette replete the madona. The clarette sorcerize the madona. If the clarette sorcerize the roice then the roice sponge the clarette. If something sorcerize the madona then it is ecological. If the madona is ecological and the madona is unobserved then the madona sorcerize the roice. If something is ecological and it replete the madona then it sorcerize the roice. If something is ecological and it sponge the madona then it sorcerize the clarette. If something replete the madona then it sponge the madona. The clarette is lendable.", "logic": "\nIntended(roice)\nEcological(roice)\nReplete(roice, madona)\nReplete(roice, clarette)\nSorcerize(roice, madona)\nSorcerize(roice, clarette)\nBimonthly(madona)\nLendable(madona)\nUnobserved(madona)\nReplete(madona, roice)\nSorcerize(madona, roice)\nBimonthly(clarette)\nReplete(clarette, roice)\nReplete(clarette, madona)\nSorcerize(clarette, madona)\nSorcerize(clarette, roice) -> Sponge(roice, clarette)\nforall x (Sorcerize(x, madona) -> Ecological(x))\nEcological(madona) and Unobserved(madona) -> Sorcerize(madona, roice)\nforall x (Ecological(x) and Replete(x, madona) -> Sorcerize(x, roice))\nforall x (Ecological(x) and Sponge(x, madona) -> Sorcerize(x, clarette))\nforall x (Replete(x, madona) -> Sponge(x, madona))\n\nLendable(clarette)\n\nLendable(clarette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The reynolds is german. The reynolds is scrawny. The reynolds does not need the marthena. The daune riot the marthena. The daune is finer. The marthena riot the reynolds. The marthena is german. The marthena whap the reynolds. The marthena whap the laurianne. The marthena foam the reynolds. The laurianne riot the daune. The laurianne is anorthitic. The laurianne is profuse. The laurianne is scrawny. The laurianne does not need the daune. If someone riot the marthena and the marthena foam the daune then the daune riot the reynolds. If the laurianne is german then the laurianne does not eat the marthena. If someone whap the daune and they are profuse then the daune foam the laurianne. If the daune riot the marthena and the daune does not visit the reynolds then the marthena does not need the reynolds. If someone riot the reynolds then they visit the daune. If someone whap the marthena then the marthena is scrawny. If someone riot the marthena and the marthena whap the laurianne then the laurianne does not eat the reynolds. If someone riot the laurianne and the laurianne is scrawny then the laurianne riot the reynolds. The marthena riot the reynolds.", "logic": "\nGerman(reynolds)\nScrawny(reynolds)\nnot Whap(reynolds, marthena)\nRiot(daune, marthena)\nFiner(daune)\nRiot(marthena, reynolds)\nGerman(marthena)\nWhap(marthena, reynolds)\nWhap(marthena, laurianne)\nFoam(marthena, reynolds)\nRiot(laurianne, daune)\nAnorthitic(laurianne)\nProfuse(laurianne)\nScrawny(laurianne)\nnot Whap(laurianne, daune)\nforall x (Riot(x, marthena) and Foam(marthena, daune) -> Riot(daune, reynolds))\nGerman(laurianne) -> not Riot(laurianne, marthena)\nforall x (Whap(x, daune) and Profuse(x) -> Foam(daune, laurianne))\nRiot(daune, marthena) and not Foam(daune, reynolds) -> not Whap(marthena, reynolds)\nforall x (Riot(x, reynolds) -> Foam(x, daune))\nforall x (Whap(x, marthena) -> Scrawny(marthena))\nforall x (Riot(x, marthena) and Whap(marthena, laurianne) -> not Riot(laurianne, reynolds))\nforall x (Riot(x, laurianne) and Scrawny(laurianne) -> Riot(laurianne, reynolds))\n\nRiot(marthena, reynolds)\n\ntherefore Riot(marthena, reynolds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The jaynell is riddled. The jaynell is rightful. The jaynell does not need the magnum. The joelie mate the magnum. The joelie is sanious. The magnum mate the jaynell. The magnum is riddled. The magnum cock the jaynell. The magnum cock the dyanna. The magnum expend the jaynell. The dyanna mate the joelie. The dyanna is flighted. The dyanna is sulfurous. The dyanna is rightful. The dyanna does not need the joelie. If someone mate the magnum and the magnum expend the joelie then the joelie mate the jaynell. If the dyanna is riddled then the dyanna does not eat the magnum. If someone cock the joelie and they are sulfurous then the joelie expend the dyanna. If the joelie mate the magnum and the joelie does not visit the jaynell then the magnum does not need the jaynell. If someone mate the jaynell then they visit the joelie. If someone cock the magnum then the magnum is rightful. If someone mate the magnum and the magnum cock the dyanna then the dyanna does not eat the jaynell. If someone mate the dyanna and the dyanna is rightful then the dyanna mate the jaynell. The jaynell is not riddled.", "logic": "\nRiddled(jaynell)\nRightful(jaynell)\nnot Cock(jaynell, magnum)\nMate(joelie, magnum)\nSanious(joelie)\nMate(magnum, jaynell)\nRiddled(magnum)\nCock(magnum, jaynell)\nCock(magnum, dyanna)\nExpend(magnum, jaynell)\nMate(dyanna, joelie)\nFlighted(dyanna)\nSulfurous(dyanna)\nRightful(dyanna)\nnot Cock(dyanna, joelie)\nforall x (Mate(x, magnum) and Expend(magnum, joelie) -> Mate(joelie, jaynell))\nRiddled(dyanna) -> not Mate(dyanna, magnum)\nforall x (Cock(x, joelie) and Sulfurous(x) -> Expend(joelie, dyanna))\nMate(joelie, magnum) and not Expend(joelie, jaynell) -> not Cock(magnum, jaynell)\nforall x (Mate(x, jaynell) -> Expend(x, joelie))\nforall x (Cock(x, magnum) -> Rightful(magnum))\nforall x (Mate(x, magnum) and Cock(magnum, dyanna) -> not Mate(dyanna, jaynell))\nforall x (Mate(x, dyanna) and Rightful(dyanna) -> Mate(dyanna, jaynell))\n\nnot Riddled(jaynell)\n\ntherefore Riddled(jaynell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The natalie is potbound. The natalie is efficient. The natalie does not need the carmelia. The corene sidestep the carmelia. The corene is undersize. The carmelia sidestep the natalie. The carmelia is potbound. The carmelia contradict the natalie. The carmelia contradict the sella. The carmelia bunker the natalie. The sella sidestep the corene. The sella is retrorse. The sella is faddy. The sella is efficient. The sella does not need the corene. If someone sidestep the carmelia and the carmelia bunker the corene then the corene sidestep the natalie. If the sella is potbound then the sella does not eat the carmelia. If someone contradict the corene and they are faddy then the corene bunker the sella. If the corene sidestep the carmelia and the corene does not visit the natalie then the carmelia does not need the natalie. If someone sidestep the natalie then they visit the corene. If someone contradict the carmelia then the carmelia is efficient. If someone sidestep the carmelia and the carmelia contradict the sella then the sella does not eat the natalie. If someone sidestep the sella and the sella is efficient then the sella sidestep the natalie. The carmelia bunker the corene.", "logic": "\nPotbound(natalie)\nEfficient(natalie)\nnot Contradict(natalie, carmelia)\nSidestep(corene, carmelia)\nUndersize(corene)\nSidestep(carmelia, natalie)\nPotbound(carmelia)\nContradict(carmelia, natalie)\nContradict(carmelia, sella)\nBunker(carmelia, natalie)\nSidestep(sella, corene)\nRetrorse(sella)\nFaddy(sella)\nEfficient(sella)\nnot Contradict(sella, corene)\nforall x (Sidestep(x, carmelia) and Bunker(carmelia, corene) -> Sidestep(corene, natalie))\nPotbound(sella) -> not Sidestep(sella, carmelia)\nforall x (Contradict(x, corene) and Faddy(x) -> Bunker(corene, sella))\nSidestep(corene, carmelia) and not Bunker(corene, natalie) -> not Contradict(carmelia, natalie)\nforall x (Sidestep(x, natalie) -> Bunker(x, corene))\nforall x (Contradict(x, carmelia) -> Efficient(carmelia))\nforall x (Sidestep(x, carmelia) and Contradict(carmelia, sella) -> not Sidestep(sella, natalie))\nforall x (Sidestep(x, sella) and Efficient(sella) -> Sidestep(sella, natalie))\n\nBunker(carmelia, corene)\n\nSidestep(carmelia, natalie) and forall x (Sidestep(x, natalie) -> Bunker(x, corene)) -> therefore Bunker(carmelia, corene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The ambrosia is boyish. The ambrosia is diseased. The ambrosia does not need the mischa. The leighton whiz the mischa. The leighton is diverging. The mischa whiz the ambrosia. The mischa is boyish. The mischa devein the ambrosia. The mischa devein the desmund. The mischa adore the ambrosia. The desmund whiz the leighton. The desmund is coiled. The desmund is tomboyish. The desmund is diseased. The desmund does not need the leighton. If someone whiz the mischa and the mischa adore the leighton then the leighton whiz the ambrosia. If the desmund is boyish then the desmund does not eat the mischa. If someone devein the leighton and they are tomboyish then the leighton adore the desmund. If the leighton whiz the mischa and the leighton does not visit the ambrosia then the mischa does not need the ambrosia. If someone whiz the ambrosia then they visit the leighton. If someone devein the mischa then the mischa is diseased. If someone whiz the mischa and the mischa devein the desmund then the desmund does not eat the ambrosia. If someone whiz the desmund and the desmund is diseased then the desmund whiz the ambrosia. The mischa does not visit the leighton.", "logic": "\nBoyish(ambrosia)\nDiseased(ambrosia)\nnot Devein(ambrosia, mischa)\nWhiz(leighton, mischa)\nDiverging(leighton)\nWhiz(mischa, ambrosia)\nBoyish(mischa)\nDevein(mischa, ambrosia)\nDevein(mischa, desmund)\nAdore(mischa, ambrosia)\nWhiz(desmund, leighton)\nCoiled(desmund)\nTomboyish(desmund)\nDiseased(desmund)\nnot Devein(desmund, leighton)\nforall x (Whiz(x, mischa) and Adore(mischa, leighton) -> Whiz(leighton, ambrosia))\nBoyish(desmund) -> not Whiz(desmund, mischa)\nforall x (Devein(x, leighton) and Tomboyish(x) -> Adore(leighton, desmund))\nWhiz(leighton, mischa) and not Adore(leighton, ambrosia) -> not Devein(mischa, ambrosia)\nforall x (Whiz(x, ambrosia) -> Adore(x, leighton))\nforall x (Devein(x, mischa) -> Diseased(mischa))\nforall x (Whiz(x, mischa) and Devein(mischa, desmund) -> not Whiz(desmund, ambrosia))\nforall x (Whiz(x, desmund) and Diseased(desmund) -> Whiz(desmund, ambrosia))\n\nnot Adore(mischa, leighton)\n\nWhiz(mischa, ambrosia) and forall x (Whiz(x, ambrosia) -> Adore(x, leighton)) -> therefore Adore(mischa, leighton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The tuckie is crafty. The tuckie is prominent. The tuckie does not need the desirae. The kari muck the desirae. The kari is reedy. The desirae muck the tuckie. The desirae is crafty. The desirae commingle the tuckie. The desirae commingle the armstrong. The desirae mortify the tuckie. The armstrong muck the kari. The armstrong is aery. The armstrong is ramshackle. The armstrong is prominent. The armstrong does not need the kari. If someone muck the desirae and the desirae mortify the kari then the kari muck the tuckie. If the armstrong is crafty then the armstrong does not eat the desirae. If someone commingle the kari and they are ramshackle then the kari mortify the armstrong. If the kari muck the desirae and the kari does not visit the tuckie then the desirae does not need the tuckie. If someone muck the tuckie then they visit the kari. If someone commingle the desirae then the desirae is prominent. If someone muck the desirae and the desirae commingle the armstrong then the armstrong does not eat the tuckie. If someone muck the armstrong and the armstrong is prominent then the armstrong muck the tuckie. The kari muck the tuckie.", "logic": "\nCrafty(tuckie)\nProminent(tuckie)\nnot Commingle(tuckie, desirae)\nMuck(kari, desirae)\nReedy(kari)\nMuck(desirae, tuckie)\nCrafty(desirae)\nCommingle(desirae, tuckie)\nCommingle(desirae, armstrong)\nMortify(desirae, tuckie)\nMuck(armstrong, kari)\nAery(armstrong)\nRamshackle(armstrong)\nProminent(armstrong)\nnot Commingle(armstrong, kari)\nforall x (Muck(x, desirae) and Mortify(desirae, kari) -> Muck(kari, tuckie))\nCrafty(armstrong) -> not Muck(armstrong, desirae)\nforall x (Commingle(x, kari) and Ramshackle(x) -> Mortify(kari, armstrong))\nMuck(kari, desirae) and not Mortify(kari, tuckie) -> not Commingle(desirae, tuckie)\nforall x (Muck(x, tuckie) -> Mortify(x, kari))\nforall x (Commingle(x, desirae) -> Prominent(desirae))\nforall x (Muck(x, desirae) and Commingle(desirae, armstrong) -> not Muck(armstrong, tuckie))\nforall x (Muck(x, armstrong) and Prominent(armstrong) -> Muck(armstrong, tuckie))\n\nMuck(kari, tuckie)\n\nMuck(desirae, tuckie) and forall x (Muck(x, tuckie) -> Mortify(x, kari)) -> therefore Mortify(desirae, kari) Muck(kari, desirae) and Mortify(desirae, kari) and forall x (Muck(x, desirae) and Mortify(desirae, kari) -> Muck(kari, tuckie)) -> therefore Muck(kari, tuckie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The nollie is semilunar. The nollie is gloved. The nollie does not need the kris. The anurag brazen the kris. The anurag is moral. The kris brazen the nollie. The kris is semilunar. The kris shrink the nollie. The kris shrink the delmar. The kris soften the nollie. The delmar brazen the anurag. The delmar is unread. The delmar is docile. The delmar is gloved. The delmar does not need the anurag. If someone brazen the kris and the kris soften the anurag then the anurag brazen the nollie. If the delmar is semilunar then the delmar does not eat the kris. If someone shrink the anurag and they are docile then the anurag soften the delmar. If the anurag brazen the kris and the anurag does not visit the nollie then the kris does not need the nollie. If someone brazen the nollie then they visit the anurag. If someone shrink the kris then the kris is gloved. If someone brazen the kris and the kris shrink the delmar then the delmar does not eat the nollie. If someone brazen the delmar and the delmar is gloved then the delmar brazen the nollie. The anurag does not eat the nollie.", "logic": "\nSemilunar(nollie)\nGloved(nollie)\nnot Shrink(nollie, kris)\nBrazen(anurag, kris)\nMoral(anurag)\nBrazen(kris, nollie)\nSemilunar(kris)\nShrink(kris, nollie)\nShrink(kris, delmar)\nSoften(kris, nollie)\nBrazen(delmar, anurag)\nUnread(delmar)\nDocile(delmar)\nGloved(delmar)\nnot Shrink(delmar, anurag)\nforall x (Brazen(x, kris) and Soften(kris, anurag) -> Brazen(anurag, nollie))\nSemilunar(delmar) -> not Brazen(delmar, kris)\nforall x (Shrink(x, anurag) and Docile(x) -> Soften(anurag, delmar))\nBrazen(anurag, kris) and not Soften(anurag, nollie) -> not Shrink(kris, nollie)\nforall x (Brazen(x, nollie) -> Soften(x, anurag))\nforall x (Shrink(x, kris) -> Gloved(kris))\nforall x (Brazen(x, kris) and Shrink(kris, delmar) -> not Brazen(delmar, nollie))\nforall x (Brazen(x, delmar) and Gloved(delmar) -> Brazen(delmar, nollie))\n\nnot Brazen(anurag, nollie)\n\nBrazen(kris, nollie) and forall x (Brazen(x, nollie) -> Soften(x, anurag)) -> therefore Soften(kris, anurag) Brazen(anurag, kris) and Soften(kris, anurag) and forall x (Brazen(x, kris) and Soften(kris, anurag) -> Brazen(anurag, nollie)) -> therefore Brazen(anurag, nollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The crysta is misused. The crysta is clashing. The crysta does not need the cortney. The saul handcolor the cortney. The saul is unlaureled. The cortney handcolor the crysta. The cortney is misused. The cortney chair the crysta. The cortney chair the tore. The cortney flute the crysta. The tore handcolor the saul. The tore is captious. The tore is sourish. The tore is clashing. The tore does not need the saul. If someone handcolor the cortney and the cortney flute the saul then the saul handcolor the crysta. If the tore is misused then the tore does not eat the cortney. If someone chair the saul and they are sourish then the saul flute the tore. If the saul handcolor the cortney and the saul does not visit the crysta then the cortney does not need the crysta. If someone handcolor the crysta then they visit the saul. If someone chair the cortney then the cortney is clashing. If someone handcolor the cortney and the cortney chair the tore then the tore does not eat the crysta. If someone handcolor the tore and the tore is clashing then the tore handcolor the crysta. The saul flute the saul.", "logic": "\nMisused(crysta)\nClashing(crysta)\nnot Chair(crysta, cortney)\nHandcolor(saul, cortney)\nUnlaureled(saul)\nHandcolor(cortney, crysta)\nMisused(cortney)\nChair(cortney, crysta)\nChair(cortney, tore)\nFlute(cortney, crysta)\nHandcolor(tore, saul)\nCaptious(tore)\nSourish(tore)\nClashing(tore)\nnot Chair(tore, saul)\nforall x (Handcolor(x, cortney) and Flute(cortney, saul) -> Handcolor(saul, crysta))\nMisused(tore) -> not Handcolor(tore, cortney)\nforall x (Chair(x, saul) and Sourish(x) -> Flute(saul, tore))\nHandcolor(saul, cortney) and not Flute(saul, crysta) -> not Chair(cortney, crysta)\nforall x (Handcolor(x, crysta) -> Flute(x, saul))\nforall x (Chair(x, cortney) -> Clashing(cortney))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, cortney) and Chair(cortney, tore) -> not Handcolor(tore, crysta))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, tore) and Clashing(tore) -> Handcolor(tore, crysta))\n\nFlute(saul, saul)\n\nHandcolor(cortney, crysta) and forall x (Handcolor(x, crysta) -> Flute(x, saul)) -> therefore Flute(cortney, saul) Handcolor(saul, cortney) and Flute(cortney, saul) and forall x (Handcolor(x, cortney) and Flute(cortney, saul) -> Handcolor(saul, crysta)) -> therefore Handcolor(saul, crysta) Handcolor(saul, crysta) and forall x (Handcolor(x, crysta) -> Flute(x, saul)) -> therefore Flute(saul, saul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The chancey is abused. The chancey is muciferous. The chancey does not need the harriot. The isaac bang the harriot. The isaac is unguarded. The harriot bang the chancey. The harriot is abused. The harriot robe the chancey. The harriot robe the lazar. The harriot chute the chancey. The lazar bang the isaac. The lazar is symbolic. The lazar is sloped. The lazar is muciferous. The lazar does not need the isaac. If someone bang the harriot and the harriot chute the isaac then the isaac bang the chancey. If the lazar is abused then the lazar does not eat the harriot. If someone robe the isaac and they are sloped then the isaac chute the lazar. If the isaac bang the harriot and the isaac does not visit the chancey then the harriot does not need the chancey. If someone bang the chancey then they visit the isaac. If someone robe the harriot then the harriot is muciferous. If someone bang the harriot and the harriot robe the lazar then the lazar does not eat the chancey. If someone bang the lazar and the lazar is muciferous then the lazar bang the chancey. The isaac does not visit the isaac.", "logic": "\nAbused(chancey)\nMuciferous(chancey)\nnot Robe(chancey, harriot)\nBang(isaac, harriot)\nUnguarded(isaac)\nBang(harriot, chancey)\nAbused(harriot)\nRobe(harriot, chancey)\nRobe(harriot, lazar)\nChute(harriot, chancey)\nBang(lazar, isaac)\nSymbolic(lazar)\nSloped(lazar)\nMuciferous(lazar)\nnot Robe(lazar, isaac)\nforall x (Bang(x, harriot) and Chute(harriot, isaac) -> Bang(isaac, chancey))\nAbused(lazar) -> not Bang(lazar, harriot)\nforall x (Robe(x, isaac) and Sloped(x) -> Chute(isaac, lazar))\nBang(isaac, harriot) and not Chute(isaac, chancey) -> not Robe(harriot, chancey)\nforall x (Bang(x, chancey) -> Chute(x, isaac))\nforall x (Robe(x, harriot) -> Muciferous(harriot))\nforall x (Bang(x, harriot) and Robe(harriot, lazar) -> not Bang(lazar, chancey))\nforall x (Bang(x, lazar) and Muciferous(lazar) -> Bang(lazar, chancey))\n\nnot Chute(isaac, isaac)\n\nBang(harriot, chancey) and forall x (Bang(x, chancey) -> Chute(x, isaac)) -> therefore Chute(harriot, isaac) Bang(isaac, harriot) and Chute(harriot, isaac) and forall x (Bang(x, harriot) and Chute(harriot, isaac) -> Bang(isaac, chancey)) -> therefore Bang(isaac, chancey) Bang(isaac, chancey) and forall x (Bang(x, chancey) -> Chute(x, isaac)) -> therefore Chute(isaac, isaac)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The finley is wild. The finley is aspiring. The finley does not need the joell. The blanche engorge the joell. The blanche is central. The joell engorge the finley. The joell is wild. The joell cancel the finley. The joell cancel the zeb. The joell rive the finley. The zeb engorge the blanche. The zeb is felicitous. The zeb is perilous. The zeb is aspiring. The zeb does not need the blanche. If someone engorge the joell and the joell rive the blanche then the blanche engorge the finley. If the zeb is wild then the zeb does not eat the joell. If someone cancel the blanche and they are perilous then the blanche rive the zeb. If the blanche engorge the joell and the blanche does not visit the finley then the joell does not need the finley. If someone engorge the finley then they visit the blanche. If someone cancel the joell then the joell is aspiring. If someone engorge the joell and the joell cancel the zeb then the zeb does not eat the finley. If someone engorge the zeb and the zeb is aspiring then the zeb engorge the finley. The joell is not aspiring.", "logic": "\nWild(finley)\nAspiring(finley)\nnot Cancel(finley, joell)\nEngorge(blanche, joell)\nCentral(blanche)\nEngorge(joell, finley)\nWild(joell)\nCancel(joell, finley)\nCancel(joell, zeb)\nRive(joell, finley)\nEngorge(zeb, blanche)\nFelicitous(zeb)\nPerilous(zeb)\nAspiring(zeb)\nnot Cancel(zeb, blanche)\nforall x (Engorge(x, joell) and Rive(joell, blanche) -> Engorge(blanche, finley))\nWild(zeb) -> not Engorge(zeb, joell)\nforall x (Cancel(x, blanche) and Perilous(x) -> Rive(blanche, zeb))\nEngorge(blanche, joell) and not Rive(blanche, finley) -> not Cancel(joell, finley)\nforall x (Engorge(x, finley) -> Rive(x, blanche))\nforall x (Cancel(x, joell) -> Aspiring(joell))\nforall x (Engorge(x, joell) and Cancel(joell, zeb) -> not Engorge(zeb, finley))\nforall x (Engorge(x, zeb) and Aspiring(zeb) -> Engorge(zeb, finley))\n\nnot Aspiring(joell)\n\nforall x (Cancel(x, joell) -> Aspiring(joell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The yankee is gymnastic. The yankee is discerning. The yankee does not need the french. The theresita transport the french. The theresita is habitable. The french transport the yankee. The french is gymnastic. The french mosey the yankee. The french mosey the shane. The french animize the yankee. The shane transport the theresita. The shane is appressed. The shane is excused. The shane is discerning. The shane does not need the theresita. If someone transport the french and the french animize the theresita then the theresita transport the yankee. If the shane is gymnastic then the shane does not eat the french. If someone mosey the theresita and they are excused then the theresita animize the shane. If the theresita transport the french and the theresita does not visit the yankee then the french does not need the yankee. If someone transport the yankee then they visit the theresita. If someone mosey the french then the french is discerning. If someone transport the french and the french mosey the shane then the shane does not eat the yankee. If someone transport the shane and the shane is discerning then the shane transport the yankee. The shane animize the theresita.", "logic": "\nGymnastic(yankee)\nDiscerning(yankee)\nnot Mosey(yankee, french)\nTransport(theresita, french)\nHabitable(theresita)\nTransport(french, yankee)\nGymnastic(french)\nMosey(french, yankee)\nMosey(french, shane)\nAnimize(french, yankee)\nTransport(shane, theresita)\nAppressed(shane)\nExcused(shane)\nDiscerning(shane)\nnot Mosey(shane, theresita)\nforall x (Transport(x, french) and Animize(french, theresita) -> Transport(theresita, yankee))\nGymnastic(shane) -> not Transport(shane, french)\nforall x (Mosey(x, theresita) and Excused(x) -> Animize(theresita, shane))\nTransport(theresita, french) and not Animize(theresita, yankee) -> not Mosey(french, yankee)\nforall x (Transport(x, yankee) -> Animize(x, theresita))\nforall x (Mosey(x, french) -> Discerning(french))\nforall x (Transport(x, french) and Mosey(french, shane) -> not Transport(shane, yankee))\nforall x (Transport(x, shane) and Discerning(shane) -> Transport(shane, yankee))\n\nAnimize(shane, theresita)\n\nforall x (Transport(x, yankee) -> Animize(x, theresita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The jillana is unrealised. The jillana is ligneous. The jillana does not need the elwina. The charleen rend the elwina. The charleen is putrid. The elwina rend the jillana. The elwina is unrealised. The elwina task the jillana. The elwina task the winfield. The elwina associate the jillana. The winfield rend the charleen. The winfield is lifeless. The winfield is scandalous. The winfield is ligneous. The winfield does not need the charleen. If someone rend the elwina and the elwina associate the charleen then the charleen rend the jillana. If the winfield is unrealised then the winfield does not eat the elwina. If someone task the charleen and they are scandalous then the charleen associate the winfield. If the charleen rend the elwina and the charleen does not visit the jillana then the elwina does not need the jillana. If someone rend the jillana then they visit the charleen. If someone task the elwina then the elwina is ligneous. If someone rend the elwina and the elwina task the winfield then the winfield does not eat the jillana. If someone rend the winfield and the winfield is ligneous then the winfield rend the jillana. The charleen does not visit the winfield.", "logic": "\nUnrealised(jillana)\nLigneous(jillana)\nnot Task(jillana, elwina)\nRend(charleen, elwina)\nPutrid(charleen)\nRend(elwina, jillana)\nUnrealised(elwina)\nTask(elwina, jillana)\nTask(elwina, winfield)\nAssociate(elwina, jillana)\nRend(winfield, charleen)\nLifeless(winfield)\nScandalous(winfield)\nLigneous(winfield)\nnot Task(winfield, charleen)\nforall x (Rend(x, elwina) and Associate(elwina, charleen) -> Rend(charleen, jillana))\nUnrealised(winfield) -> not Rend(winfield, elwina)\nforall x (Task(x, charleen) and Scandalous(x) -> Associate(charleen, winfield))\nRend(charleen, elwina) and not Associate(charleen, jillana) -> not Task(elwina, jillana)\nforall x (Rend(x, jillana) -> Associate(x, charleen))\nforall x (Task(x, elwina) -> Ligneous(elwina))\nforall x (Rend(x, elwina) and Task(elwina, winfield) -> not Rend(winfield, jillana))\nforall x (Rend(x, winfield) and Ligneous(winfield) -> Rend(winfield, jillana))\n\nnot Associate(charleen, winfield)\n\nforall x (Task(x, charleen) and Scandalous(x) -> Associate(charleen, winfield)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The peta is osseous. The peta is wordless. The peta does not need the tanner. The davida depose the tanner. The davida is ripened. The tanner depose the peta. The tanner is osseous. The tanner overshoot the peta. The tanner overshoot the robinette. The tanner numb the peta. The robinette depose the davida. The robinette is crummy. The robinette is lamenting. The robinette is wordless. The robinette does not need the davida. If someone depose the tanner and the tanner numb the davida then the davida depose the peta. If the robinette is osseous then the robinette does not eat the tanner. If someone overshoot the davida and they are lamenting then the davida numb the robinette. If the davida depose the tanner and the davida does not visit the peta then the tanner does not need the peta. If someone depose the peta then they visit the davida. If someone overshoot the tanner then the tanner is wordless. If someone depose the tanner and the tanner overshoot the robinette then the robinette does not eat the peta. If someone depose the robinette and the robinette is wordless then the robinette depose the peta. The peta numb the davida.", "logic": "\nOsseous(peta)\nWordless(peta)\nnot Overshoot(peta, tanner)\nDepose(davida, tanner)\nRipened(davida)\nDepose(tanner, peta)\nOsseous(tanner)\nOvershoot(tanner, peta)\nOvershoot(tanner, robinette)\nNumb(tanner, peta)\nDepose(robinette, davida)\nCrummy(robinette)\nLamenting(robinette)\nWordless(robinette)\nnot Overshoot(robinette, davida)\nforall x (Depose(x, tanner) and Numb(tanner, davida) -> Depose(davida, peta))\nOsseous(robinette) -> not Depose(robinette, tanner)\nforall x (Overshoot(x, davida) and Lamenting(x) -> Numb(davida, robinette))\nDepose(davida, tanner) and not Numb(davida, peta) -> not Overshoot(tanner, peta)\nforall x (Depose(x, peta) -> Numb(x, davida))\nforall x (Overshoot(x, tanner) -> Wordless(tanner))\nforall x (Depose(x, tanner) and Overshoot(tanner, robinette) -> not Depose(robinette, peta))\nforall x (Depose(x, robinette) and Wordless(robinette) -> Depose(robinette, peta))\n\nNumb(peta, davida)\n\nforall x (Depose(x, peta) -> Numb(x, davida)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The cecily is solemn. The cecily is uncertain. The cecily does not need the linnie. The cati ranch the linnie. The cati is aleutian. The linnie ranch the cecily. The linnie is solemn. The linnie seduce the cecily. The linnie seduce the adi. The linnie date the cecily. The adi ranch the cati. The adi is scrivened. The adi is uneducated. The adi is uncertain. The adi does not need the cati. If someone ranch the linnie and the linnie date the cati then the cati ranch the cecily. If the adi is solemn then the adi does not eat the linnie. If someone seduce the cati and they are uneducated then the cati date the adi. If the cati ranch the linnie and the cati does not visit the cecily then the linnie does not need the cecily. If someone ranch the cecily then they visit the cati. If someone seduce the linnie then the linnie is uncertain. If someone ranch the linnie and the linnie seduce the adi then the adi does not eat the cecily. If someone ranch the adi and the adi is uncertain then the adi ranch the cecily. The cecily does not eat the adi.", "logic": "\nSolemn(cecily)\nUncertain(cecily)\nnot Seduce(cecily, linnie)\nRanch(cati, linnie)\nAleutian(cati)\nRanch(linnie, cecily)\nSolemn(linnie)\nSeduce(linnie, cecily)\nSeduce(linnie, adi)\nDate(linnie, cecily)\nRanch(adi, cati)\nScrivened(adi)\nUneducated(adi)\nUncertain(adi)\nnot Seduce(adi, cati)\nforall x (Ranch(x, linnie) and Date(linnie, cati) -> Ranch(cati, cecily))\nSolemn(adi) -> not Ranch(adi, linnie)\nforall x (Seduce(x, cati) and Uneducated(x) -> Date(cati, adi))\nRanch(cati, linnie) and not Date(cati, cecily) -> not Seduce(linnie, cecily)\nforall x (Ranch(x, cecily) -> Date(x, cati))\nforall x (Seduce(x, linnie) -> Uncertain(linnie))\nforall x (Ranch(x, linnie) and Seduce(linnie, adi) -> not Ranch(adi, cecily))\nforall x (Ranch(x, adi) and Uncertain(adi) -> Ranch(adi, cecily))\n\nnot Ranch(cecily, adi)\n\nnot Ranch(cecily, adi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The lyda is incitive. The lyda is wriggly. The lyda does not need the whitaker. The fletcher piffle the whitaker. The fletcher is exterior. The whitaker piffle the lyda. The whitaker is incitive. The whitaker minister the lyda. The whitaker minister the florie. The whitaker bonderise the lyda. The florie piffle the fletcher. The florie is xcvii. The florie is shitless. The florie is wriggly. The florie does not need the fletcher. If someone piffle the whitaker and the whitaker bonderise the fletcher then the fletcher piffle the lyda. If the florie is incitive then the florie does not eat the whitaker. If someone minister the fletcher and they are shitless then the fletcher bonderise the florie. If the fletcher piffle the whitaker and the fletcher does not visit the lyda then the whitaker does not need the lyda. If someone piffle the lyda then they visit the fletcher. If someone minister the whitaker then the whitaker is wriggly. If someone piffle the whitaker and the whitaker minister the florie then the florie does not eat the lyda. If someone piffle the florie and the florie is wriggly then the florie piffle the lyda. The lyda minister the lyda.", "logic": "\nIncitive(lyda)\nWriggly(lyda)\nnot Minister(lyda, whitaker)\nPiffle(fletcher, whitaker)\nExterior(fletcher)\nPiffle(whitaker, lyda)\nIncitive(whitaker)\nMinister(whitaker, lyda)\nMinister(whitaker, florie)\nBonderise(whitaker, lyda)\nPiffle(florie, fletcher)\nXcvii(florie)\nShitless(florie)\nWriggly(florie)\nnot Minister(florie, fletcher)\nforall x (Piffle(x, whitaker) and Bonderise(whitaker, fletcher) -> Piffle(fletcher, lyda))\nIncitive(florie) -> not Piffle(florie, whitaker)\nforall x (Minister(x, fletcher) and Shitless(x) -> Bonderise(fletcher, florie))\nPiffle(fletcher, whitaker) and not Bonderise(fletcher, lyda) -> not Minister(whitaker, lyda)\nforall x (Piffle(x, lyda) -> Bonderise(x, fletcher))\nforall x (Minister(x, whitaker) -> Wriggly(whitaker))\nforall x (Piffle(x, whitaker) and Minister(whitaker, florie) -> not Piffle(florie, lyda))\nforall x (Piffle(x, florie) and Wriggly(florie) -> Piffle(florie, lyda))\n\nMinister(lyda, lyda)\n\nMinister(lyda, lyda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The filbert is diestrous. The filbert is equal. The filbert does not need the tisha. The adel cleanse the tisha. The adel is scrubbed. The tisha cleanse the filbert. The tisha is diestrous. The tisha customize the filbert. The tisha customize the devinne. The tisha liquidise the filbert. The devinne cleanse the adel. The devinne is frightened. The devinne is planted. The devinne is equal. The devinne does not need the adel. If someone cleanse the tisha and the tisha liquidise the adel then the adel cleanse the filbert. If the devinne is diestrous then the devinne does not eat the tisha. If someone customize the adel and they are planted then the adel liquidise the devinne. If the adel cleanse the tisha and the adel does not visit the filbert then the tisha does not need the filbert. If someone cleanse the filbert then they visit the adel. If someone customize the tisha then the tisha is equal. If someone cleanse the tisha and the tisha customize the devinne then the devinne does not eat the filbert. If someone cleanse the devinne and the devinne is equal then the devinne cleanse the filbert. The filbert does not need the devinne.", "logic": "\nDiestrous(filbert)\nEqual(filbert)\nnot Customize(filbert, tisha)\nCleanse(adel, tisha)\nScrubbed(adel)\nCleanse(tisha, filbert)\nDiestrous(tisha)\nCustomize(tisha, filbert)\nCustomize(tisha, devinne)\nLiquidise(tisha, filbert)\nCleanse(devinne, adel)\nFrightened(devinne)\nPlanted(devinne)\nEqual(devinne)\nnot Customize(devinne, adel)\nforall x (Cleanse(x, tisha) and Liquidise(tisha, adel) -> Cleanse(adel, filbert))\nDiestrous(devinne) -> not Cleanse(devinne, tisha)\nforall x (Customize(x, adel) and Planted(x) -> Liquidise(adel, devinne))\nCleanse(adel, tisha) and not Liquidise(adel, filbert) -> not Customize(tisha, filbert)\nforall x (Cleanse(x, filbert) -> Liquidise(x, adel))\nforall x (Customize(x, tisha) -> Equal(tisha))\nforall x (Cleanse(x, tisha) and Customize(tisha, devinne) -> not Cleanse(devinne, filbert))\nforall x (Cleanse(x, devinne) and Equal(devinne) -> Cleanse(devinne, filbert))\n\nnot Customize(filbert, devinne)\n\nnot Customize(filbert, devinne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The mag is shitless. The mag is podlike. The mag does not need the frances. The thorny interweave the frances. The thorny is olden. The frances interweave the mag. The frances is shitless. The frances star the mag. The frances star the rubetta. The frances sublet the mag. The rubetta interweave the thorny. The rubetta is petaled. The rubetta is cometary. The rubetta is podlike. The rubetta does not need the thorny. If someone interweave the frances and the frances sublet the thorny then the thorny interweave the mag. If the rubetta is shitless then the rubetta does not eat the frances. If someone star the thorny and they are cometary then the thorny sublet the rubetta. If the thorny interweave the frances and the thorny does not visit the mag then the frances does not need the mag. If someone interweave the mag then they visit the thorny. If someone star the frances then the frances is podlike. If someone interweave the frances and the frances star the rubetta then the rubetta does not eat the mag. If someone interweave the rubetta and the rubetta is podlike then the rubetta interweave the mag. The rubetta star the mag.", "logic": "\nShitless(mag)\nPodlike(mag)\nnot Star(mag, frances)\nInterweave(thorny, frances)\nOlden(thorny)\nInterweave(frances, mag)\nShitless(frances)\nStar(frances, mag)\nStar(frances, rubetta)\nSublet(frances, mag)\nInterweave(rubetta, thorny)\nPetaled(rubetta)\nCometary(rubetta)\nPodlike(rubetta)\nnot Star(rubetta, thorny)\nforall x (Interweave(x, frances) and Sublet(frances, thorny) -> Interweave(thorny, mag))\nShitless(rubetta) -> not Interweave(rubetta, frances)\nforall x (Star(x, thorny) and Cometary(x) -> Sublet(thorny, rubetta))\nInterweave(thorny, frances) and not Sublet(thorny, mag) -> not Star(frances, mag)\nforall x (Interweave(x, mag) -> Sublet(x, thorny))\nforall x (Star(x, frances) -> Podlike(frances))\nforall x (Interweave(x, frances) and Star(frances, rubetta) -> not Interweave(rubetta, mag))\nforall x (Interweave(x, rubetta) and Podlike(rubetta) -> Interweave(rubetta, mag))\n\nStar(rubetta, mag)\n\nStar(rubetta, mag) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The gabie is anechoic. The gabie is wakeless. The gabie is heliac. The gabie alter the johannes. The gabie clench the hephzibah. The gabie skid the johannes. The hephzibah is wakeless. The hephzibah skid the gabie. The johannes is anechoic. The johannes is wakeless. The johannes alter the hephzibah. The johannes skid the gabie. If something alter the johannes then the johannes alter the gabie. If something clench the gabie and it is mated then it alter the hephzibah. If something alter the johannes and the johannes clench the gabie then the gabie skid the hephzibah. If something clench the gabie and the gabie skid the johannes then the gabie alter the hephzibah. If something skid the hephzibah then the hephzibah is unordered. If something skid the gabie and the gabie alter the johannes then it clench the gabie. The hephzibah skid the gabie.", "logic": "\nAnechoic(gabie)\nWakeless(gabie)\nHeliac(gabie)\nAlter(gabie, johannes)\nClench(gabie, hephzibah)\nSkid(gabie, johannes)\nWakeless(hephzibah)\nSkid(hephzibah, gabie)\nAnechoic(johannes)\nWakeless(johannes)\nAlter(johannes, hephzibah)\nSkid(johannes, gabie)\nforall x (Alter(x, johannes) -> Alter(johannes, gabie))\nforall x (Clench(x, gabie) and Mated(x) -> Alter(x, hephzibah))\nforall x (Alter(x, johannes) and Clench(johannes, gabie) -> Skid(gabie, hephzibah))\nforall x (Clench(x, gabie) and Skid(gabie, johannes) -> Alter(gabie, hephzibah))\nforall x (Skid(x, hephzibah) -> Unordered(hephzibah))\nforall x (Skid(x, gabie) and Alter(gabie, johannes) -> Clench(x, gabie))\n\nSkid(hephzibah, gabie)\n\ntherefore Skid(hephzibah, gabie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The abbe is antiviral. The abbe is unpitying. The abbe is clitoric. The abbe employ the halvard. The abbe graduate the lonee. The abbe abort the halvard. The lonee is unpitying. The lonee abort the abbe. The halvard is antiviral. The halvard is unpitying. The halvard employ the lonee. The halvard abort the abbe. If something employ the halvard then the halvard employ the abbe. If something graduate the abbe and it is boracic then it employ the lonee. If something employ the halvard and the halvard graduate the abbe then the abbe abort the lonee. If something graduate the abbe and the abbe abort the halvard then the abbe employ the lonee. If something abort the lonee then the lonee is tectonic. If something abort the abbe and the abbe employ the halvard then it graduate the abbe. The abbe is not unpitying.", "logic": "\nAntiviral(abbe)\nUnpitying(abbe)\nClitoric(abbe)\nEmploy(abbe, halvard)\nGraduate(abbe, lonee)\nAbort(abbe, halvard)\nUnpitying(lonee)\nAbort(lonee, abbe)\nAntiviral(halvard)\nUnpitying(halvard)\nEmploy(halvard, lonee)\nAbort(halvard, abbe)\nforall x (Employ(x, halvard) -> Employ(halvard, abbe))\nforall x (Graduate(x, abbe) and Boracic(x) -> Employ(x, lonee))\nforall x (Employ(x, halvard) and Graduate(halvard, abbe) -> Abort(abbe, lonee))\nforall x (Graduate(x, abbe) and Abort(abbe, halvard) -> Employ(abbe, lonee))\nforall x (Abort(x, lonee) -> Tectonic(lonee))\nforall x (Abort(x, abbe) and Employ(abbe, halvard) -> Graduate(x, abbe))\n\nnot Unpitying(abbe)\n\ntherefore Unpitying(abbe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The marys is mortified. The marys is tearing. The marys is essene. The marys flock the ethelind. The marys slick the sunshine. The marys nasalise the ethelind. The sunshine is tearing. The sunshine nasalise the marys. The ethelind is mortified. The ethelind is tearing. The ethelind flock the sunshine. The ethelind nasalise the marys. If something flock the ethelind then the ethelind flock the marys. If something slick the marys and it is prying then it flock the sunshine. If something flock the ethelind and the ethelind slick the marys then the marys nasalise the sunshine. If something slick the marys and the marys nasalise the ethelind then the marys flock the sunshine. If something nasalise the sunshine then the sunshine is motherless. If something nasalise the marys and the marys flock the ethelind then it slick the marys. The ethelind flock the marys.", "logic": "\nMortified(marys)\nTearing(marys)\nEssene(marys)\nFlock(marys, ethelind)\nSlick(marys, sunshine)\nNasalise(marys, ethelind)\nTearing(sunshine)\nNasalise(sunshine, marys)\nMortified(ethelind)\nTearing(ethelind)\nFlock(ethelind, sunshine)\nNasalise(ethelind, marys)\nforall x (Flock(x, ethelind) -> Flock(ethelind, marys))\nforall x (Slick(x, marys) and Prying(x) -> Flock(x, sunshine))\nforall x (Flock(x, ethelind) and Slick(ethelind, marys) -> Nasalise(marys, sunshine))\nforall x (Slick(x, marys) and Nasalise(marys, ethelind) -> Flock(marys, sunshine))\nforall x (Nasalise(x, sunshine) -> Motherless(sunshine))\nforall x (Nasalise(x, marys) and Flock(marys, ethelind) -> Slick(x, marys))\n\nFlock(ethelind, marys)\n\nFlock(marys, ethelind) and forall x (Flock(x, ethelind) -> Flock(ethelind, marys)) -> therefore Flock(ethelind, marys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The delcine is breakneck. The delcine is pungent. The delcine is ashen. The delcine spurn the marrissa. The delcine suture the maryjane. The delcine whisker the marrissa. The maryjane is pungent. The maryjane whisker the delcine. The marrissa is breakneck. The marrissa is pungent. The marrissa spurn the maryjane. The marrissa whisker the delcine. If something spurn the marrissa then the marrissa spurn the delcine. If something suture the delcine and it is slimy then it spurn the maryjane. If something spurn the marrissa and the marrissa suture the delcine then the delcine whisker the maryjane. If something suture the delcine and the delcine whisker the marrissa then the delcine spurn the maryjane. If something whisker the maryjane then the maryjane is pathogenic. If something whisker the delcine and the delcine spurn the marrissa then it suture the delcine. The maryjane does not see the delcine.", "logic": "\nBreakneck(delcine)\nPungent(delcine)\nAshen(delcine)\nSpurn(delcine, marrissa)\nSuture(delcine, maryjane)\nWhisker(delcine, marrissa)\nPungent(maryjane)\nWhisker(maryjane, delcine)\nBreakneck(marrissa)\nPungent(marrissa)\nSpurn(marrissa, maryjane)\nWhisker(marrissa, delcine)\nforall x (Spurn(x, marrissa) -> Spurn(marrissa, delcine))\nforall x (Suture(x, delcine) and Slimy(x) -> Spurn(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Spurn(x, marrissa) and Suture(marrissa, delcine) -> Whisker(delcine, maryjane))\nforall x (Suture(x, delcine) and Whisker(delcine, marrissa) -> Spurn(delcine, maryjane))\nforall x (Whisker(x, maryjane) -> Pathogenic(maryjane))\nforall x (Whisker(x, delcine) and Spurn(delcine, marrissa) -> Suture(x, delcine))\n\nnot Suture(maryjane, delcine)\n\nWhisker(maryjane, delcine) and Spurn(delcine, marrissa) and forall x (Whisker(x, delcine) and Spurn(delcine, marrissa) -> Suture(x, delcine)) -> therefore Suture(maryjane, delcine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The amelia is acyclic. The amelia is nominative. The amelia is woody. The amelia flatter the walsh. The amelia allow the coriss. The amelia react the walsh. The coriss is nominative. The coriss react the amelia. The walsh is acyclic. The walsh is nominative. The walsh flatter the coriss. The walsh react the amelia. If something flatter the walsh then the walsh flatter the amelia. If something allow the amelia and it is phonic then it flatter the coriss. If something flatter the walsh and the walsh allow the amelia then the amelia react the coriss. If something allow the amelia and the amelia react the walsh then the amelia flatter the coriss. If something react the coriss then the coriss is venereal. If something react the amelia and the amelia flatter the walsh then it allow the amelia. The amelia flatter the coriss.", "logic": "\nAcyclic(amelia)\nNominative(amelia)\nWoody(amelia)\nFlatter(amelia, walsh)\nAllow(amelia, coriss)\nReact(amelia, walsh)\nNominative(coriss)\nReact(coriss, amelia)\nAcyclic(walsh)\nNominative(walsh)\nFlatter(walsh, coriss)\nReact(walsh, amelia)\nforall x (Flatter(x, walsh) -> Flatter(walsh, amelia))\nforall x (Allow(x, amelia) and Phonic(x) -> Flatter(x, coriss))\nforall x (Flatter(x, walsh) and Allow(walsh, amelia) -> React(amelia, coriss))\nforall x (Allow(x, amelia) and React(amelia, walsh) -> Flatter(amelia, coriss))\nforall x (React(x, coriss) -> Venereal(coriss))\nforall x (React(x, amelia) and Flatter(amelia, walsh) -> Allow(x, amelia))\n\nFlatter(amelia, coriss)\n\nReact(walsh, amelia) and Flatter(amelia, walsh) and forall x (React(x, amelia) and Flatter(amelia, walsh) -> Allow(x, amelia)) -> therefore Allow(walsh, amelia) Allow(walsh, amelia) and React(amelia, walsh) and forall x (Allow(x, amelia) and React(amelia, walsh) -> Flatter(amelia, coriss)) -> therefore Flatter(amelia, coriss)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The kaile is animating. The kaile is sprawling. The kaile is botchy. The kaile encompass the teodor. The kaile recover the brina. The kaile subvention the teodor. The brina is sprawling. The brina subvention the kaile. The teodor is animating. The teodor is sprawling. The teodor encompass the brina. The teodor subvention the kaile. If something encompass the teodor then the teodor encompass the kaile. If something recover the kaile and it is banded then it encompass the brina. If something encompass the teodor and the teodor recover the kaile then the kaile subvention the brina. If something recover the kaile and the kaile subvention the teodor then the kaile encompass the brina. If something subvention the brina then the brina is invalid. If something subvention the kaile and the kaile encompass the teodor then it recover the kaile. The kaile does not need the brina.", "logic": "\nAnimating(kaile)\nSprawling(kaile)\nBotchy(kaile)\nEncompass(kaile, teodor)\nRecover(kaile, brina)\nSubvention(kaile, teodor)\nSprawling(brina)\nSubvention(brina, kaile)\nAnimating(teodor)\nSprawling(teodor)\nEncompass(teodor, brina)\nSubvention(teodor, kaile)\nforall x (Encompass(x, teodor) -> Encompass(teodor, kaile))\nforall x (Recover(x, kaile) and Banded(x) -> Encompass(x, brina))\nforall x (Encompass(x, teodor) and Recover(teodor, kaile) -> Subvention(kaile, brina))\nforall x (Recover(x, kaile) and Subvention(kaile, teodor) -> Encompass(kaile, brina))\nforall x (Subvention(x, brina) -> Invalid(brina))\nforall x (Subvention(x, kaile) and Encompass(kaile, teodor) -> Recover(x, kaile))\n\nnot Encompass(kaile, brina)\n\nSubvention(teodor, kaile) and Encompass(kaile, teodor) and forall x (Subvention(x, kaile) and Encompass(kaile, teodor) -> Recover(x, kaile)) -> therefore Recover(teodor, kaile) Recover(teodor, kaile) and Subvention(kaile, teodor) and forall x (Recover(x, kaile) and Subvention(kaile, teodor) -> Encompass(kaile, brina)) -> therefore Encompass(kaile, brina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The tarrance is indigenous. The tarrance is sectorial. The tarrance is statute. The tarrance nosh the lolita. The tarrance demean the bertine. The tarrance pick the lolita. The bertine is sectorial. The bertine pick the tarrance. The lolita is indigenous. The lolita is sectorial. The lolita nosh the bertine. The lolita pick the tarrance. If something nosh the lolita then the lolita nosh the tarrance. If something demean the tarrance and it is abortive then it nosh the bertine. If something nosh the lolita and the lolita demean the tarrance then the tarrance pick the bertine. If something demean the tarrance and the tarrance pick the lolita then the tarrance nosh the bertine. If something pick the bertine then the bertine is quickset. If something pick the tarrance and the tarrance nosh the lolita then it demean the tarrance. The bertine is quickset.", "logic": "\nIndigenous(tarrance)\nSectorial(tarrance)\nStatute(tarrance)\nNosh(tarrance, lolita)\nDemean(tarrance, bertine)\nPick(tarrance, lolita)\nSectorial(bertine)\nPick(bertine, tarrance)\nIndigenous(lolita)\nSectorial(lolita)\nNosh(lolita, bertine)\nPick(lolita, tarrance)\nforall x (Nosh(x, lolita) -> Nosh(lolita, tarrance))\nforall x (Demean(x, tarrance) and Abortive(x) -> Nosh(x, bertine))\nforall x (Nosh(x, lolita) and Demean(lolita, tarrance) -> Pick(tarrance, bertine))\nforall x (Demean(x, tarrance) and Pick(tarrance, lolita) -> Nosh(tarrance, bertine))\nforall x (Pick(x, bertine) -> Quickset(bertine))\nforall x (Pick(x, tarrance) and Nosh(tarrance, lolita) -> Demean(x, tarrance))\n\nQuickset(bertine)\n\nPick(lolita, tarrance) and Nosh(tarrance, lolita) and forall x (Pick(x, tarrance) and Nosh(tarrance, lolita) -> Demean(x, tarrance)) -> therefore Demean(lolita, tarrance) Nosh(tarrance, lolita) and Demean(lolita, tarrance) and forall x (Nosh(x, lolita) and Demean(lolita, tarrance) -> Pick(tarrance, bertine)) -> therefore Pick(tarrance, bertine) Pick(tarrance, bertine) and forall x (Pick(x, bertine) -> Quickset(bertine)) -> therefore Quickset(bertine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The monique is frizzy. The monique is meaning. The monique is killable. The monique right the ethelred. The monique fade the normand. The monique colourize the ethelred. The normand is meaning. The normand colourize the monique. The ethelred is frizzy. The ethelred is meaning. The ethelred right the normand. The ethelred colourize the monique. If something right the ethelred then the ethelred right the monique. If something fade the monique and it is solved then it right the normand. If something right the ethelred and the ethelred fade the monique then the monique colourize the normand. If something fade the monique and the monique colourize the ethelred then the monique right the normand. If something colourize the normand then the normand is finical. If something colourize the monique and the monique right the ethelred then it fade the monique. The normand is not finical.", "logic": "\nFrizzy(monique)\nMeaning(monique)\nKillable(monique)\nRight(monique, ethelred)\nFade(monique, normand)\nColourize(monique, ethelred)\nMeaning(normand)\nColourize(normand, monique)\nFrizzy(ethelred)\nMeaning(ethelred)\nRight(ethelred, normand)\nColourize(ethelred, monique)\nforall x (Right(x, ethelred) -> Right(ethelred, monique))\nforall x (Fade(x, monique) and Solved(x) -> Right(x, normand))\nforall x (Right(x, ethelred) and Fade(ethelred, monique) -> Colourize(monique, normand))\nforall x (Fade(x, monique) and Colourize(monique, ethelred) -> Right(monique, normand))\nforall x (Colourize(x, normand) -> Finical(normand))\nforall x (Colourize(x, monique) and Right(monique, ethelred) -> Fade(x, monique))\n\nnot Finical(normand)\n\nColourize(ethelred, monique) and Right(monique, ethelred) and forall x (Colourize(x, monique) and Right(monique, ethelred) -> Fade(x, monique)) -> therefore Fade(ethelred, monique) Right(monique, ethelred) and Fade(ethelred, monique) and forall x (Right(x, ethelred) and Fade(ethelred, monique) -> Colourize(monique, normand)) -> therefore Colourize(monique, normand) Colourize(monique, normand) and forall x (Colourize(x, normand) -> Finical(normand)) -> therefore Finical(normand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The sayres is crisp. The sayres is flickering. The sayres is deathlike. The sayres slobber the stormie. The sayres scull the titus. The sayres chock the stormie. The titus is flickering. The titus chock the sayres. The stormie is crisp. The stormie is flickering. The stormie slobber the titus. The stormie chock the sayres. If something slobber the stormie then the stormie slobber the sayres. If something scull the sayres and it is amylaceous then it slobber the titus. If something slobber the stormie and the stormie scull the sayres then the sayres chock the titus. If something scull the sayres and the sayres chock the stormie then the sayres slobber the titus. If something chock the titus then the titus is ciliate. If something chock the sayres and the sayres slobber the stormie then it scull the sayres. The titus does not need the titus.", "logic": "\nCrisp(sayres)\nFlickering(sayres)\nDeathlike(sayres)\nSlobber(sayres, stormie)\nScull(sayres, titus)\nChock(sayres, stormie)\nFlickering(titus)\nChock(titus, sayres)\nCrisp(stormie)\nFlickering(stormie)\nSlobber(stormie, titus)\nChock(stormie, sayres)\nforall x (Slobber(x, stormie) -> Slobber(stormie, sayres))\nforall x (Scull(x, sayres) and Amylaceous(x) -> Slobber(x, titus))\nforall x (Slobber(x, stormie) and Scull(stormie, sayres) -> Chock(sayres, titus))\nforall x (Scull(x, sayres) and Chock(sayres, stormie) -> Slobber(sayres, titus))\nforall x (Chock(x, titus) -> Ciliate(titus))\nforall x (Chock(x, sayres) and Slobber(sayres, stormie) -> Scull(x, sayres))\n\nnot Slobber(titus, titus)\n\nforall x (Scull(x, sayres) and Amylaceous(x) -> Slobber(x, titus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The caroljean is groveling. The caroljean is voltarian. The caroljean is lexical. The caroljean predate the andres. The caroljean resonate the bengt. The caroljean silt the andres. The bengt is voltarian. The bengt silt the caroljean. The andres is groveling. The andres is voltarian. The andres predate the bengt. The andres silt the caroljean. If something predate the andres then the andres predate the caroljean. If something resonate the caroljean and it is ceremonial then it predate the bengt. If something predate the andres and the andres resonate the caroljean then the caroljean silt the bengt. If something resonate the caroljean and the caroljean silt the andres then the caroljean predate the bengt. If something silt the bengt then the bengt is fraught. If something silt the caroljean and the caroljean predate the andres then it resonate the caroljean. The caroljean resonate the caroljean.", "logic": "\nGroveling(caroljean)\nVoltarian(caroljean)\nLexical(caroljean)\nPredate(caroljean, andres)\nResonate(caroljean, bengt)\nSilt(caroljean, andres)\nVoltarian(bengt)\nSilt(bengt, caroljean)\nGroveling(andres)\nVoltarian(andres)\nPredate(andres, bengt)\nSilt(andres, caroljean)\nforall x (Predate(x, andres) -> Predate(andres, caroljean))\nforall x (Resonate(x, caroljean) and Ceremonial(x) -> Predate(x, bengt))\nforall x (Predate(x, andres) and Resonate(andres, caroljean) -> Silt(caroljean, bengt))\nforall x (Resonate(x, caroljean) and Silt(caroljean, andres) -> Predate(caroljean, bengt))\nforall x (Silt(x, bengt) -> Fraught(bengt))\nforall x (Silt(x, caroljean) and Predate(caroljean, andres) -> Resonate(x, caroljean))\n\nResonate(caroljean, caroljean)\n\nforall x (Silt(x, caroljean) and Predate(caroljean, andres) -> Resonate(x, caroljean)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The travers is peritoneal. The travers is shakedown. The travers is redemptory. The travers decollate the lisandra. The travers carnify the dannye. The travers pitchfork the lisandra. The dannye is shakedown. The dannye pitchfork the travers. The lisandra is peritoneal. The lisandra is shakedown. The lisandra decollate the dannye. The lisandra pitchfork the travers. If something decollate the lisandra then the lisandra decollate the travers. If something carnify the travers and it is tetragonal then it decollate the dannye. If something decollate the lisandra and the lisandra carnify the travers then the travers pitchfork the dannye. If something carnify the travers and the travers pitchfork the lisandra then the travers decollate the dannye. If something pitchfork the dannye then the dannye is duplicable. If something pitchfork the travers and the travers decollate the lisandra then it carnify the travers. The lisandra is not duplicable.", "logic": "\nPeritoneal(travers)\nShakedown(travers)\nRedemptory(travers)\nDecollate(travers, lisandra)\nCarnify(travers, dannye)\nPitchfork(travers, lisandra)\nShakedown(dannye)\nPitchfork(dannye, travers)\nPeritoneal(lisandra)\nShakedown(lisandra)\nDecollate(lisandra, dannye)\nPitchfork(lisandra, travers)\nforall x (Decollate(x, lisandra) -> Decollate(lisandra, travers))\nforall x (Carnify(x, travers) and Tetragonal(x) -> Decollate(x, dannye))\nforall x (Decollate(x, lisandra) and Carnify(lisandra, travers) -> Pitchfork(travers, dannye))\nforall x (Carnify(x, travers) and Pitchfork(travers, lisandra) -> Decollate(travers, dannye))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, dannye) -> Duplicable(dannye))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, travers) and Decollate(travers, lisandra) -> Carnify(x, travers))\n\nnot Duplicable(lisandra)\n\nnot Duplicable(lisandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The ashley is mean. The ashley is spiffy. The ashley is yearlong. The ashley expedite the alane. The ashley flutter the karyl. The ashley raiment the alane. The karyl is spiffy. The karyl raiment the ashley. The alane is mean. The alane is spiffy. The alane expedite the karyl. The alane raiment the ashley. If something expedite the alane then the alane expedite the ashley. If something flutter the ashley and it is legal then it expedite the karyl. If something expedite the alane and the alane flutter the ashley then the ashley raiment the karyl. If something flutter the ashley and the ashley raiment the alane then the ashley expedite the karyl. If something raiment the karyl then the karyl is leglike. If something raiment the ashley and the ashley expedite the alane then it flutter the ashley. The karyl flutter the alane.", "logic": "\nMean(ashley)\nSpiffy(ashley)\nYearlong(ashley)\nExpedite(ashley, alane)\nFlutter(ashley, karyl)\nRaiment(ashley, alane)\nSpiffy(karyl)\nRaiment(karyl, ashley)\nMean(alane)\nSpiffy(alane)\nExpedite(alane, karyl)\nRaiment(alane, ashley)\nforall x (Expedite(x, alane) -> Expedite(alane, ashley))\nforall x (Flutter(x, ashley) and Legal(x) -> Expedite(x, karyl))\nforall x (Expedite(x, alane) and Flutter(alane, ashley) -> Raiment(ashley, karyl))\nforall x (Flutter(x, ashley) and Raiment(ashley, alane) -> Expedite(ashley, karyl))\nforall x (Raiment(x, karyl) -> Leglike(karyl))\nforall x (Raiment(x, ashley) and Expedite(ashley, alane) -> Flutter(x, ashley))\n\nFlutter(karyl, alane)\n\nFlutter(karyl, alane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The joela is considered. The joela is unifacial. The joela is model. The joela cocoon the ferne. The joela film the karly. The joela heap the ferne. The karly is unifacial. The karly heap the joela. The ferne is considered. The ferne is unifacial. The ferne cocoon the karly. The ferne heap the joela. If something cocoon the ferne then the ferne cocoon the joela. If something film the joela and it is anxious then it cocoon the karly. If something cocoon the ferne and the ferne film the joela then the joela heap the karly. If something film the joela and the joela heap the ferne then the joela cocoon the karly. If something heap the karly then the karly is liberated. If something heap the joela and the joela cocoon the ferne then it film the joela. The ferne does not see the karly.", "logic": "\nConsidered(joela)\nUnifacial(joela)\nModel(joela)\nCocoon(joela, ferne)\nFilm(joela, karly)\nHeap(joela, ferne)\nUnifacial(karly)\nHeap(karly, joela)\nConsidered(ferne)\nUnifacial(ferne)\nCocoon(ferne, karly)\nHeap(ferne, joela)\nforall x (Cocoon(x, ferne) -> Cocoon(ferne, joela))\nforall x (Film(x, joela) and Anxious(x) -> Cocoon(x, karly))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, ferne) and Film(ferne, joela) -> Heap(joela, karly))\nforall x (Film(x, joela) and Heap(joela, ferne) -> Cocoon(joela, karly))\nforall x (Heap(x, karly) -> Liberated(karly))\nforall x (Heap(x, joela) and Cocoon(joela, ferne) -> Film(x, joela))\n\nnot Film(ferne, karly)\n\nnot Film(ferne, karly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The roshelle is parlous. The roshelle is civilised. The roshelle is subacute. The roshelle dialyze the mayda. The roshelle wham the joey. The roshelle prattle the mayda. The joey is civilised. The joey prattle the roshelle. The mayda is parlous. The mayda is civilised. The mayda dialyze the joey. The mayda prattle the roshelle. If something dialyze the mayda then the mayda dialyze the roshelle. If something wham the roshelle and it is lactogenic then it dialyze the joey. If something dialyze the mayda and the mayda wham the roshelle then the roshelle prattle the joey. If something wham the roshelle and the roshelle prattle the mayda then the roshelle dialyze the joey. If something prattle the joey then the joey is french. If something prattle the roshelle and the roshelle dialyze the mayda then it wham the roshelle. The roshelle is french.", "logic": "\nParlous(roshelle)\nCivilised(roshelle)\nSubacute(roshelle)\nDialyze(roshelle, mayda)\nWham(roshelle, joey)\nPrattle(roshelle, mayda)\nCivilised(joey)\nPrattle(joey, roshelle)\nParlous(mayda)\nCivilised(mayda)\nDialyze(mayda, joey)\nPrattle(mayda, roshelle)\nforall x (Dialyze(x, mayda) -> Dialyze(mayda, roshelle))\nforall x (Wham(x, roshelle) and Lactogenic(x) -> Dialyze(x, joey))\nforall x (Dialyze(x, mayda) and Wham(mayda, roshelle) -> Prattle(roshelle, joey))\nforall x (Wham(x, roshelle) and Prattle(roshelle, mayda) -> Dialyze(roshelle, joey))\nforall x (Prattle(x, joey) -> French(joey))\nforall x (Prattle(x, roshelle) and Dialyze(roshelle, mayda) -> Wham(x, roshelle))\n\nFrench(roshelle)\n\nFrench(roshelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The alvera is tearless. The alvera is upper. The alvera is stomatal. The alvera sanitize the flint. The alvera grok the minni. The alvera front the flint. The minni is upper. The minni front the alvera. The flint is tearless. The flint is upper. The flint sanitize the minni. The flint front the alvera. If something sanitize the flint then the flint sanitize the alvera. If something grok the alvera and it is annelid then it sanitize the minni. If something sanitize the flint and the flint grok the alvera then the alvera front the minni. If something grok the alvera and the alvera front the flint then the alvera sanitize the minni. If something front the minni then the minni is nebulous. If something front the alvera and the alvera sanitize the flint then it grok the alvera. The minni does not need the alvera.", "logic": "\nTearless(alvera)\nUpper(alvera)\nStomatal(alvera)\nSanitize(alvera, flint)\nGrok(alvera, minni)\nFront(alvera, flint)\nUpper(minni)\nFront(minni, alvera)\nTearless(flint)\nUpper(flint)\nSanitize(flint, minni)\nFront(flint, alvera)\nforall x (Sanitize(x, flint) -> Sanitize(flint, alvera))\nforall x (Grok(x, alvera) and Annelid(x) -> Sanitize(x, minni))\nforall x (Sanitize(x, flint) and Grok(flint, alvera) -> Front(alvera, minni))\nforall x (Grok(x, alvera) and Front(alvera, flint) -> Sanitize(alvera, minni))\nforall x (Front(x, minni) -> Nebulous(minni))\nforall x (Front(x, alvera) and Sanitize(alvera, flint) -> Grok(x, alvera))\n\nnot Sanitize(minni, alvera)\n\nnot Sanitize(minni, alvera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The morley is nonprofit. The morley is timorous. The morley is luxurious. The morley mind the colin. The morley intonate the ingeberg. The morley summarize the colin. The ingeberg is timorous. The ingeberg summarize the morley. The colin is nonprofit. The colin is timorous. The colin mind the ingeberg. The colin summarize the morley. If something mind the colin then the colin mind the morley. If something intonate the morley and it is periodical then it mind the ingeberg. If something mind the colin and the colin intonate the morley then the morley summarize the ingeberg. If something intonate the morley and the morley summarize the colin then the morley mind the ingeberg. If something summarize the ingeberg then the ingeberg is scholarly. If something summarize the morley and the morley mind the colin then it intonate the morley. The colin is periodical.", "logic": "\nNonprofit(morley)\nTimorous(morley)\nLuxurious(morley)\nMind(morley, colin)\nIntonate(morley, ingeberg)\nSummarize(morley, colin)\nTimorous(ingeberg)\nSummarize(ingeberg, morley)\nNonprofit(colin)\nTimorous(colin)\nMind(colin, ingeberg)\nSummarize(colin, morley)\nforall x (Mind(x, colin) -> Mind(colin, morley))\nforall x (Intonate(x, morley) and Periodical(x) -> Mind(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Mind(x, colin) and Intonate(colin, morley) -> Summarize(morley, ingeberg))\nforall x (Intonate(x, morley) and Summarize(morley, colin) -> Mind(morley, ingeberg))\nforall x (Summarize(x, ingeberg) -> Scholarly(ingeberg))\nforall x (Summarize(x, morley) and Mind(morley, colin) -> Intonate(x, morley))\n\nPeriodical(colin)\n\nPeriodical(colin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The forester is visualized. Blue things are fabian. All visualized things are private. If something is fabian then it is eroded. The forester is visualized.", "logic": "\nVisualized(forester)\nforall x (Private(x) -> Fabian(x))\nforall x (Visualized(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Fabian(x) -> Eroded(x))\n\nVisualized(forester)\n\ntherefore Visualized(forester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The birgit is hoary. Blue things are austrian. All hoary things are costless. If something is austrian then it is resurgent. The birgit is not hoary.", "logic": "\nHoary(birgit)\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Austrian(x))\nforall x (Hoary(x) -> Costless(x))\nforall x (Austrian(x) -> Resurgent(x))\n\nnot Hoary(birgit)\n\ntherefore Hoary(birgit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The adolfo is croaky. Blue things are worshipful. All croaky things are splotched. If something is worshipful then it is wriggling. The adolfo is splotched.", "logic": "\nCroaky(adolfo)\nforall x (Splotched(x) -> Worshipful(x))\nforall x (Croaky(x) -> Splotched(x))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Wriggling(x))\n\nSplotched(adolfo)\n\nCroaky(adolfo) and forall x (Croaky(x) -> Splotched(x)) -> therefore Splotched(adolfo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The felisha is ulcerated. Blue things are acanthoid. All ulcerated things are captive. If something is acanthoid then it is genotypic. The felisha is not captive.", "logic": "\nUlcerated(felisha)\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Ulcerated(x) -> Captive(x))\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) -> Genotypic(x))\n\nnot Captive(felisha)\n\nUlcerated(felisha) and forall x (Ulcerated(x) -> Captive(x)) -> therefore Captive(felisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The randolph is heathen. Blue things are garmented. All heathen things are sunny. If something is garmented then it is squirting. The randolph is garmented.", "logic": "\nHeathen(randolph)\nforall x (Sunny(x) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Heathen(x) -> Sunny(x))\nforall x (Garmented(x) -> Squirting(x))\n\nGarmented(randolph)\n\nHeathen(randolph) and forall x (Heathen(x) -> Sunny(x)) -> therefore Sunny(randolph) Sunny(randolph) and forall x (Sunny(x) -> Garmented(x)) -> therefore Garmented(randolph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The camilla is acetous. Blue things are acervate. All acetous things are eloquent. If something is acervate then it is winded. The camilla is not acervate.", "logic": "\nAcetous(camilla)\nforall x (Eloquent(x) -> Acervate(x))\nforall x (Acetous(x) -> Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Acervate(x) -> Winded(x))\n\nnot Acervate(camilla)\n\nAcetous(camilla) and forall x (Acetous(x) -> Eloquent(x)) -> therefore Eloquent(camilla) Eloquent(camilla) and forall x (Eloquent(x) -> Acervate(x)) -> therefore Acervate(camilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The corabella is unaltered. Blue things are bilabial. All unaltered things are styptic. If something is bilabial then it is chopped. The corabella is chopped.", "logic": "\nUnaltered(corabella)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) -> Styptic(x))\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Chopped(x))\n\nChopped(corabella)\n\nUnaltered(corabella) and forall x (Unaltered(x) -> Styptic(x)) -> therefore Styptic(corabella) Styptic(corabella) and forall x (Styptic(x) -> Bilabial(x)) -> therefore Bilabial(corabella) Bilabial(corabella) and forall x (Bilabial(x) -> Chopped(x)) -> therefore Chopped(corabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The agnes is dishonest. Blue things are inordinate. All dishonest things are untiring. If something is inordinate then it is appellant. The agnes is not appellant.", "logic": "\nDishonest(agnes)\nforall x (Untiring(x) -> Inordinate(x))\nforall x (Dishonest(x) -> Untiring(x))\nforall x (Inordinate(x) -> Appellant(x))\n\nnot Appellant(agnes)\n\nDishonest(agnes) and forall x (Dishonest(x) -> Untiring(x)) -> therefore Untiring(agnes) Untiring(agnes) and forall x (Untiring(x) -> Inordinate(x)) -> therefore Inordinate(agnes) Inordinate(agnes) and forall x (Inordinate(x) -> Appellant(x)) -> therefore Appellant(agnes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The bobinette is climatic. Blue things are theocratic. All climatic things are mithraic. If something is theocratic then it is insane. The bobinette is not green.", "logic": "\nClimatic(bobinette)\nforall x (Mithraic(x) -> Theocratic(x))\nforall x (Climatic(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Theocratic(x) -> Insane(x))\n\nnot Green(bobinette)\n\nnot Green(bobinette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The sheeree is rhizoidal. Blue things are warmed. All rhizoidal things are crabbed. If something is warmed then it is reborn. The sheeree eats the sheeree.", "logic": "\nRhizoidal(sheeree)\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Crabbed(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Reborn(x))\n\nEats(sheeree, sheeree)\n\nEats(sheeree, sheeree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The jeremie is simplified. Blue things are swimming. All simplified things are defendable. If something is swimming then it is theocratic. The jeremie does not see the jeremie.", "logic": "\nSimplified(jeremie)\nforall x (Defendable(x) -> Swimming(x))\nforall x (Simplified(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Swimming(x) -> Theocratic(x))\n\nnot Sees(jeremie, jeremie)\n\nnot Sees(jeremie, jeremie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The jervis is newsy. Blue things are obligated. All newsy things are motor. If something is obligated then it is redemptive. The jervis needs the jervis.", "logic": "\nNewsy(jervis)\nforall x (Motor(x) -> Obligated(x))\nforall x (Newsy(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Obligated(x) -> Redemptive(x))\n\nNeeds(jervis, jervis)\n\nNeeds(jervis, jervis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "Loree is rummy. Annalisa is burning. Annalisa is rummy. Annalisa is pervasive. Annalisa is blushful. Christoph is pervasive. Christoph is blushful. If Loree is blushful and Loree is burning then Loree is otic. All pervasive, rummy people are brave. All rummy people are biyearly. All biyearly people are pervasive. If Christoph is blushful then Christoph is brave. All pervasive, burning people are rummy. Annalisa is blushful.", "logic": "\nRummy(loree)\nBurning(annalisa)\nRummy(annalisa)\nPervasive(annalisa)\nBlushful(annalisa)\nPervasive(christoph)\nBlushful(christoph)\nBlushful(loree) and Burning(loree) -> Otic(loree)\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and Rummy(x) -> Brave(x))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> Pervasive(x))\nBlushful(christoph) -> Brave(christoph)\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and Burning(x) -> Rummy(x))\n\nBlushful(annalisa)\n\ntherefore Blushful(annalisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Fionna is bilabiate. Ritchie is unmixed. Ritchie is bilabiate. Ritchie is dyadic. Ritchie is affable. Dick is dyadic. Dick is affable. If Fionna is affable and Fionna is unmixed then Fionna is wilted. All dyadic, bilabiate people are diminished. All bilabiate people are frankish. All frankish people are dyadic. If Dick is affable then Dick is diminished. All dyadic, unmixed people are bilabiate. Ritchie is not affable.", "logic": "\nBilabiate(fionna)\nUnmixed(ritchie)\nBilabiate(ritchie)\nDyadic(ritchie)\nAffable(ritchie)\nDyadic(dick)\nAffable(dick)\nAffable(fionna) and Unmixed(fionna) -> Wilted(fionna)\nforall x (Dyadic(x) and Bilabiate(x) -> Diminished(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Frankish(x))\nforall x (Frankish(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nAffable(dick) -> Diminished(dick)\nforall x (Dyadic(x) and Unmixed(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\n\nnot Affable(ritchie)\n\ntherefore Affable(ritchie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Aila is deceptive. Jud is clitoric. Jud is deceptive. Jud is balding. Jud is diluvian. Robenia is balding. Robenia is diluvian. If Aila is diluvian and Aila is clitoric then Aila is knobbed. All balding, deceptive people are main. All deceptive people are stabilized. All stabilized people are balding. If Robenia is diluvian then Robenia is main. All balding, clitoric people are deceptive. Jud is stabilized.", "logic": "\nDeceptive(aila)\nClitoric(jud)\nDeceptive(jud)\nBalding(jud)\nDiluvian(jud)\nBalding(robenia)\nDiluvian(robenia)\nDiluvian(aila) and Clitoric(aila) -> Knobbed(aila)\nforall x (Balding(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Main(x))\nforall x (Deceptive(x) -> Stabilized(x))\nforall x (Stabilized(x) -> Balding(x))\nDiluvian(robenia) -> Main(robenia)\nforall x (Balding(x) and Clitoric(x) -> Deceptive(x))\n\nStabilized(jud)\n\nDeceptive(jud) and forall x (Deceptive(x) -> Stabilized(x)) -> therefore Stabilized(jud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Shelly is imaginary. Mona is bloodshot. Mona is imaginary. Mona is rarefied. Mona is benevolent. Anatol is rarefied. Anatol is benevolent. If Shelly is benevolent and Shelly is bloodshot then Shelly is incertain. All rarefied, imaginary people are ungual. All imaginary people are acrophobic. All acrophobic people are rarefied. If Anatol is benevolent then Anatol is ungual. All rarefied, bloodshot people are imaginary. Anatol is not ungual.", "logic": "\nImaginary(shelly)\nBloodshot(mona)\nImaginary(mona)\nRarefied(mona)\nBenevolent(mona)\nRarefied(anatol)\nBenevolent(anatol)\nBenevolent(shelly) and Bloodshot(shelly) -> Incertain(shelly)\nforall x (Rarefied(x) and Imaginary(x) -> Ungual(x))\nforall x (Imaginary(x) -> Acrophobic(x))\nforall x (Acrophobic(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nBenevolent(anatol) -> Ungual(anatol)\nforall x (Rarefied(x) and Bloodshot(x) -> Imaginary(x))\n\nnot Ungual(anatol)\n\nBenevolent(anatol) and Benevolent(anatol) -> Ungual(anatol) -> therefore Ungual(anatol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Jorie is summery. Ardith is insightful. Ardith is summery. Ardith is commercial. Ardith is etiologic. Megen is commercial. Megen is etiologic. If Jorie is etiologic and Jorie is insightful then Jorie is preachy. All commercial, summery people are waste. All summery people are umpteenth. All umpteenth people are commercial. If Megen is etiologic then Megen is waste. All commercial, insightful people are summery. Jorie is commercial.", "logic": "\nSummery(jorie)\nInsightful(ardith)\nSummery(ardith)\nCommercial(ardith)\nEtiologic(ardith)\nCommercial(megen)\nEtiologic(megen)\nEtiologic(jorie) and Insightful(jorie) -> Preachy(jorie)\nforall x (Commercial(x) and Summery(x) -> Waste(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Umpteenth(x))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) -> Commercial(x))\nEtiologic(megen) -> Waste(megen)\nforall x (Commercial(x) and Insightful(x) -> Summery(x))\n\nCommercial(jorie)\n\nSummery(jorie) and forall x (Summery(x) -> Umpteenth(x)) -> therefore Umpteenth(jorie) Umpteenth(jorie) and forall x (Umpteenth(x) -> Commercial(x)) -> therefore Commercial(jorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Willetta is strange. Oralie is unfettered. Oralie is strange. Oralie is inviting. Oralie is slangy. Patin is inviting. Patin is slangy. If Willetta is slangy and Willetta is unfettered then Willetta is moved. All inviting, strange people are sterilized. All strange people are bespoken. All bespoken people are inviting. If Patin is slangy then Patin is sterilized. All inviting, unfettered people are strange. Willetta is not inviting.", "logic": "\nStrange(willetta)\nUnfettered(oralie)\nStrange(oralie)\nInviting(oralie)\nSlangy(oralie)\nInviting(patin)\nSlangy(patin)\nSlangy(willetta) and Unfettered(willetta) -> Moved(willetta)\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Strange(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Inviting(x))\nSlangy(patin) -> Sterilized(patin)\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Unfettered(x) -> Strange(x))\n\nnot Inviting(willetta)\n\nStrange(willetta) and forall x (Strange(x) -> Bespoken(x)) -> therefore Bespoken(willetta) Bespoken(willetta) and forall x (Bespoken(x) -> Inviting(x)) -> therefore Inviting(willetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Arvin is gauzy. Juliane is skewed. Juliane is gauzy. Juliane is twisting. Juliane is gamey. Davide is twisting. Davide is gamey. If Arvin is gamey and Arvin is skewed then Arvin is grouchy. All twisting, gauzy people are outside. All gauzy people are unforced. All unforced people are twisting. If Davide is gamey then Davide is outside. All twisting, skewed people are gauzy. Arvin is outside.", "logic": "\nGauzy(arvin)\nSkewed(juliane)\nGauzy(juliane)\nTwisting(juliane)\nGamey(juliane)\nTwisting(davide)\nGamey(davide)\nGamey(arvin) and Skewed(arvin) -> Grouchy(arvin)\nforall x (Twisting(x) and Gauzy(x) -> Outside(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Unforced(x) -> Twisting(x))\nGamey(davide) -> Outside(davide)\nforall x (Twisting(x) and Skewed(x) -> Gauzy(x))\n\nOutside(arvin)\n\nGauzy(arvin) and forall x (Gauzy(x) -> Unforced(x)) -> therefore Unforced(arvin) Unforced(arvin) and forall x (Unforced(x) -> Twisting(x)) -> therefore Twisting(arvin) Twisting(arvin) and Gauzy(arvin) and forall x (Twisting(x) and Gauzy(x) -> Outside(x)) -> therefore Outside(arvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Harlene is thirsty. Valry is placating. Valry is thirsty. Valry is cochlear. Valry is spindly. Cordelia is cochlear. Cordelia is spindly. If Harlene is spindly and Harlene is placating then Harlene is cogged. All cochlear, thirsty people are pretorian. All thirsty people are crossbred. All crossbred people are cochlear. If Cordelia is spindly then Cordelia is pretorian. All cochlear, placating people are thirsty. Harlene is not pretorian.", "logic": "\nThirsty(harlene)\nPlacating(valry)\nThirsty(valry)\nCochlear(valry)\nSpindly(valry)\nCochlear(cordelia)\nSpindly(cordelia)\nSpindly(harlene) and Placating(harlene) -> Cogged(harlene)\nforall x (Cochlear(x) and Thirsty(x) -> Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) -> Crossbred(x))\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> Cochlear(x))\nSpindly(cordelia) -> Pretorian(cordelia)\nforall x (Cochlear(x) and Placating(x) -> Thirsty(x))\n\nnot Pretorian(harlene)\n\nThirsty(harlene) and forall x (Thirsty(x) -> Crossbred(x)) -> therefore Crossbred(harlene) Crossbred(harlene) and forall x (Crossbred(x) -> Cochlear(x)) -> therefore Cochlear(harlene) Cochlear(harlene) and Thirsty(harlene) and forall x (Cochlear(x) and Thirsty(x) -> Pretorian(x)) -> therefore Pretorian(harlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Spike is soleless. Danya is sinister. Danya is soleless. Danya is narrowed. Danya is preferable. Kalli is narrowed. Kalli is preferable. If Spike is preferable and Spike is sinister then Spike is lowbred. All narrowed, soleless people are debatable. All soleless people are imbecile. All imbecile people are narrowed. If Kalli is preferable then Kalli is debatable. All narrowed, sinister people are soleless. Kalli is not soleless.", "logic": "\nSoleless(spike)\nSinister(danya)\nSoleless(danya)\nNarrowed(danya)\nPreferable(danya)\nNarrowed(kalli)\nPreferable(kalli)\nPreferable(spike) and Sinister(spike) -> Lowbred(spike)\nforall x (Narrowed(x) and Soleless(x) -> Debatable(x))\nforall x (Soleless(x) -> Imbecile(x))\nforall x (Imbecile(x) -> Narrowed(x))\nPreferable(kalli) -> Debatable(kalli)\nforall x (Narrowed(x) and Sinister(x) -> Soleless(x))\n\nnot Soleless(kalli)\n\nforall x (Narrowed(x) and Sinister(x) -> Soleless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Agnes is gainful. Trixi is unclaimed. Trixi is gainful. Trixi is bellying. Trixi is calcaneal. Marena is bellying. Marena is calcaneal. If Agnes is calcaneal and Agnes is unclaimed then Agnes is metameric. All bellying, gainful people are personal. All gainful people are umpteen. All umpteen people are bellying. If Marena is calcaneal then Marena is personal. All bellying, unclaimed people are gainful. Agnes is metameric.", "logic": "\nGainful(agnes)\nUnclaimed(trixi)\nGainful(trixi)\nBellying(trixi)\nCalcaneal(trixi)\nBellying(marena)\nCalcaneal(marena)\nCalcaneal(agnes) and Unclaimed(agnes) -> Metameric(agnes)\nforall x (Bellying(x) and Gainful(x) -> Personal(x))\nforall x (Gainful(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Bellying(x))\nCalcaneal(marena) -> Personal(marena)\nforall x (Bellying(x) and Unclaimed(x) -> Gainful(x))\n\nMetameric(agnes)\n\nCalcaneal(agnes) and Unclaimed(agnes) -> Metameric(agnes) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Fifine is depressing. Valaria is broken. Valaria is depressing. Valaria is vivacious. Valaria is bristly. Karlen is vivacious. Karlen is bristly. If Fifine is bristly and Fifine is broken then Fifine is wrapped. All vivacious, depressing people are vague. All depressing people are sandalled. All sandalled people are vivacious. If Karlen is bristly then Karlen is vague. All vivacious, broken people are depressing. Karlen is not sandalled.", "logic": "\nDepressing(fifine)\nBroken(valaria)\nDepressing(valaria)\nVivacious(valaria)\nBristly(valaria)\nVivacious(karlen)\nBristly(karlen)\nBristly(fifine) and Broken(fifine) -> Wrapped(fifine)\nforall x (Vivacious(x) and Depressing(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Sandalled(x))\nforall x (Sandalled(x) -> Vivacious(x))\nBristly(karlen) -> Vague(karlen)\nforall x (Vivacious(x) and Broken(x) -> Depressing(x))\n\nnot Sandalled(karlen)\n\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Sandalled(x)) <- forall x (Vivacious(x) and Broken(x) -> Depressing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Dalton is gleeful. Marina is unrested. Marina is gleeful. Marina is snakelike. Marina is boiled. Lizbeth is snakelike. Lizbeth is boiled. If Dalton is boiled and Dalton is unrested then Dalton is nilotic. All snakelike, gleeful people are uncrowded. All gleeful people are messy. All messy people are snakelike. If Lizbeth is boiled then Lizbeth is uncrowded. All snakelike, unrested people are gleeful. Lizbeth is nilotic.", "logic": "\nGleeful(dalton)\nUnrested(marina)\nGleeful(marina)\nSnakelike(marina)\nBoiled(marina)\nSnakelike(lizbeth)\nBoiled(lizbeth)\nBoiled(dalton) and Unrested(dalton) -> Nilotic(dalton)\nforall x (Snakelike(x) and Gleeful(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Messy(x))\nforall x (Messy(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nBoiled(lizbeth) -> Uncrowded(lizbeth)\nforall x (Snakelike(x) and Unrested(x) -> Gleeful(x))\n\nNilotic(lizbeth)\n\nNilotic(lizbeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Mandie is flavorful. Elnar is reechoing. Elnar is flavorful. Elnar is swift. Elnar is weensy. Antonetta is swift. Antonetta is weensy. If Mandie is weensy and Mandie is reechoing then Mandie is texan. All swift, flavorful people are unentitled. All flavorful people are wimpy. All wimpy people are swift. If Antonetta is weensy then Antonetta is unentitled. All swift, reechoing people are flavorful. Elnar is not texan.", "logic": "\nFlavorful(mandie)\nReechoing(elnar)\nFlavorful(elnar)\nSwift(elnar)\nWeensy(elnar)\nSwift(antonetta)\nWeensy(antonetta)\nWeensy(mandie) and Reechoing(mandie) -> Texan(mandie)\nforall x (Swift(x) and Flavorful(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Flavorful(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) -> Swift(x))\nWeensy(antonetta) -> Unentitled(antonetta)\nforall x (Swift(x) and Reechoing(x) -> Flavorful(x))\n\nnot Texan(elnar)\n\nnot Texan(elnar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Blondelle is emotive. Matthew is bereft. Matthew is emotive. Matthew is hominid. Matthew is emeritus. Katheryn is hominid. Katheryn is emeritus. If Blondelle is emeritus and Blondelle is bereft then Blondelle is wanted. All hominid, emotive people are crusted. All emotive people are rupestral. All rupestral people are hominid. If Katheryn is emeritus then Katheryn is crusted. All hominid, bereft people are emotive. Katheryn is bereft.", "logic": "\nEmotive(blondelle)\nBereft(matthew)\nEmotive(matthew)\nHominid(matthew)\nEmeritus(matthew)\nHominid(katheryn)\nEmeritus(katheryn)\nEmeritus(blondelle) and Bereft(blondelle) -> Wanted(blondelle)\nforall x (Hominid(x) and Emotive(x) -> Crusted(x))\nforall x (Emotive(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Rupestral(x) -> Hominid(x))\nEmeritus(katheryn) -> Crusted(katheryn)\nforall x (Hominid(x) and Bereft(x) -> Emotive(x))\n\nBereft(katheryn)\n\nBereft(katheryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Helli is weightless. Lucas is dexterous. Lucas is weightless. Lucas is fulfilled. Lucas is bully. Jaquelin is fulfilled. Jaquelin is bully. If Helli is bully and Helli is dexterous then Helli is sombre. All fulfilled, weightless people are firm. All weightless people are cobwebby. All cobwebby people are fulfilled. If Jaquelin is bully then Jaquelin is firm. All fulfilled, dexterous people are weightless. Helli is not dexterous.", "logic": "\nWeightless(helli)\nDexterous(lucas)\nWeightless(lucas)\nFulfilled(lucas)\nBully(lucas)\nFulfilled(jaquelin)\nBully(jaquelin)\nBully(helli) and Dexterous(helli) -> Sombre(helli)\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) and Weightless(x) -> Firm(x))\nforall x (Weightless(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) -> Fulfilled(x))\nBully(jaquelin) -> Firm(jaquelin)\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) and Dexterous(x) -> Weightless(x))\n\nnot Dexterous(helli)\n\nnot Dexterous(helli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Hildy is preferred. Emmey is kenyan. Emmey is preferred. Emmey is windward. Emmey is unearned. Crawford is windward. Crawford is unearned. If Hildy is unearned and Hildy is kenyan then Hildy is ladened. All windward, preferred people are dubitable. All preferred people are blistering. All blistering people are windward. If Crawford is unearned then Crawford is dubitable. All windward, kenyan people are preferred. Hildy is unearned.", "logic": "\nPreferred(hildy)\nKenyan(emmey)\nPreferred(emmey)\nWindward(emmey)\nUnearned(emmey)\nWindward(crawford)\nUnearned(crawford)\nUnearned(hildy) and Kenyan(hildy) -> Ladened(hildy)\nforall x (Windward(x) and Preferred(x) -> Dubitable(x))\nforall x (Preferred(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Blistering(x) -> Windward(x))\nUnearned(crawford) -> Dubitable(crawford)\nforall x (Windward(x) and Kenyan(x) -> Preferred(x))\n\nUnearned(hildy)\n\nUnearned(hildy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Jasmine is rude. Loretta is bursiform. Loretta is cacuminal. Loretta is clxxv. Toddie is rude. Toddie is cacuminal. Toddie is clxxv. Helen is bursiform. Helen is cacuminal. Helen is apologetic. Young people are altruistic. If Jasmine is bursiform then Jasmine is clxxv. Quiet people are apologetic. If Jasmine is cacuminal then Jasmine is clxxv. If someone is rude then they are cacuminal. Cold, apologetic people are prox. Jasmine is rude.", "logic": "\nRude(jasmine)\nBursiform(loretta)\nCacuminal(loretta)\nClxxv(loretta)\nRude(toddie)\nCacuminal(toddie)\nClxxv(toddie)\nBursiform(helen)\nCacuminal(helen)\nApologetic(helen)\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nBursiform(jasmine) -> Clxxv(jasmine)\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nCacuminal(jasmine) -> Clxxv(jasmine)\nforall x (Rude(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Bursiform(x) and Apologetic(x) -> Prox(x))\n\nRude(jasmine)\n\ntherefore Rude(jasmine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Danit is unfinished. Maurice is definite. Maurice is waxlike. Maurice is uric. Adrick is unfinished. Adrick is waxlike. Adrick is uric. Averyl is definite. Averyl is waxlike. Averyl is limacine. Young people are coalesced. If Danit is definite then Danit is uric. Quiet people are limacine. If Danit is waxlike then Danit is uric. If someone is unfinished then they are waxlike. Cold, limacine people are backhanded. Averyl is not limacine.", "logic": "\nUnfinished(danit)\nDefinite(maurice)\nWaxlike(maurice)\nUric(maurice)\nUnfinished(adrick)\nWaxlike(adrick)\nUric(adrick)\nDefinite(averyl)\nWaxlike(averyl)\nLimacine(averyl)\nforall x (Limacine(x) -> Coalesced(x))\nDefinite(danit) -> Uric(danit)\nforall x (Waxlike(x) -> Limacine(x))\nWaxlike(danit) -> Uric(danit)\nforall x (Unfinished(x) -> Waxlike(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) and Limacine(x) -> Backhanded(x))\n\nnot Limacine(averyl)\n\ntherefore Limacine(averyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Kailey is short. Nerti is elderly. Nerti is unleaded. Nerti is fated. Lonnie is short. Lonnie is unleaded. Lonnie is fated. Rosalind is elderly. Rosalind is unleaded. Rosalind is shoddy. Young people are southward. If Kailey is elderly then Kailey is fated. Quiet people are shoddy. If Kailey is unleaded then Kailey is fated. If someone is short then they are unleaded. Cold, shoddy people are bedaubed. Kailey is unleaded.", "logic": "\nShort(kailey)\nElderly(nerti)\nUnleaded(nerti)\nFated(nerti)\nShort(lonnie)\nUnleaded(lonnie)\nFated(lonnie)\nElderly(rosalind)\nUnleaded(rosalind)\nShoddy(rosalind)\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> Southward(x))\nElderly(kailey) -> Fated(kailey)\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Shoddy(x))\nUnleaded(kailey) -> Fated(kailey)\nforall x (Short(x) -> Unleaded(x))\nforall x (Elderly(x) and Shoddy(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\n\nUnleaded(kailey)\n\nShort(kailey) and forall x (Short(x) -> Unleaded(x)) -> therefore Unleaded(kailey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Carmon is songlike. Whitby is assentient. Whitby is hiplength. Whitby is umteenth. Theobald is songlike. Theobald is hiplength. Theobald is umteenth. Francois is assentient. Francois is hiplength. Francois is enclosed. Young people are precooked. If Carmon is assentient then Carmon is umteenth. Quiet people are enclosed. If Carmon is hiplength then Carmon is umteenth. If someone is songlike then they are hiplength. Cold, enclosed people are zapotec. Francois is not zapotec.", "logic": "\nSonglike(carmon)\nAssentient(whitby)\nHiplength(whitby)\nUmteenth(whitby)\nSonglike(theobald)\nHiplength(theobald)\nUmteenth(theobald)\nAssentient(francois)\nHiplength(francois)\nEnclosed(francois)\nforall x (Enclosed(x) -> Precooked(x))\nAssentient(carmon) -> Umteenth(carmon)\nforall x (Hiplength(x) -> Enclosed(x))\nHiplength(carmon) -> Umteenth(carmon)\nforall x (Songlike(x) -> Hiplength(x))\nforall x (Assentient(x) and Enclosed(x) -> Zapotec(x))\n\nnot Zapotec(francois)\n\nAssentient(francois) and Enclosed(francois) and forall x (Assentient(x) and Enclosed(x) -> Zapotec(x)) -> therefore Zapotec(francois)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Lorain is fallow. Dolly is pawky. Dolly is tamil. Dolly is closed. Eugen is fallow. Eugen is tamil. Eugen is closed. Dudley is pawky. Dudley is tamil. Dudley is worst. Young people are germane. If Lorain is pawky then Lorain is closed. Quiet people are worst. If Lorain is tamil then Lorain is closed. If someone is fallow then they are tamil. Cold, worst people are tenth. Dolly is germane.", "logic": "\nFallow(lorain)\nPawky(dolly)\nTamil(dolly)\nClosed(dolly)\nFallow(eugen)\nTamil(eugen)\nClosed(eugen)\nPawky(dudley)\nTamil(dudley)\nWorst(dudley)\nforall x (Worst(x) -> Germane(x))\nPawky(lorain) -> Closed(lorain)\nforall x (Tamil(x) -> Worst(x))\nTamil(lorain) -> Closed(lorain)\nforall x (Fallow(x) -> Tamil(x))\nforall x (Pawky(x) and Worst(x) -> Tenth(x))\n\nGermane(dolly)\n\nTamil(dolly) and forall x (Tamil(x) -> Worst(x)) -> therefore Worst(dolly) Worst(dolly) and forall x (Worst(x) -> Germane(x)) -> therefore Germane(dolly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Dryke is compounded. Karlotte is subjugated. Karlotte is tractable. Karlotte is besotted. Eliott is compounded. Eliott is tractable. Eliott is besotted. Lurette is subjugated. Lurette is tractable. Lurette is evidential. Young people are conversant. If Dryke is subjugated then Dryke is besotted. Quiet people are evidential. If Dryke is tractable then Dryke is besotted. If someone is compounded then they are tractable. Cold, evidential people are uncrowned. Dryke is not evidential.", "logic": "\nCompounded(dryke)\nSubjugated(karlotte)\nTractable(karlotte)\nBesotted(karlotte)\nCompounded(eliott)\nTractable(eliott)\nBesotted(eliott)\nSubjugated(lurette)\nTractable(lurette)\nEvidential(lurette)\nforall x (Evidential(x) -> Conversant(x))\nSubjugated(dryke) -> Besotted(dryke)\nforall x (Tractable(x) -> Evidential(x))\nTractable(dryke) -> Besotted(dryke)\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> Tractable(x))\nforall x (Subjugated(x) and Evidential(x) -> Uncrowned(x))\n\nnot Evidential(dryke)\n\nCompounded(dryke) and forall x (Compounded(x) -> Tractable(x)) -> therefore Tractable(dryke) Tractable(dryke) and forall x (Tractable(x) -> Evidential(x)) -> therefore Evidential(dryke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Stella is sinusoidal. Von is naif. Von is sublime. Von is alarming. Coleen is sinusoidal. Coleen is sublime. Coleen is alarming. Nadean is naif. Nadean is sublime. Nadean is reported. Young people are honduran. If Stella is naif then Stella is alarming. Quiet people are reported. If Stella is sublime then Stella is alarming. If someone is sinusoidal then they are sublime. Cold, reported people are solvent. Stella is honduran.", "logic": "\nSinusoidal(stella)\nNaif(von)\nSublime(von)\nAlarming(von)\nSinusoidal(coleen)\nSublime(coleen)\nAlarming(coleen)\nNaif(nadean)\nSublime(nadean)\nReported(nadean)\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Honduran(x))\nNaif(stella) -> Alarming(stella)\nforall x (Sublime(x) -> Reported(x))\nSublime(stella) -> Alarming(stella)\nforall x (Sinusoidal(x) -> Sublime(x))\nforall x (Naif(x) and Reported(x) -> Solvent(x))\n\nHonduran(stella)\n\nSinusoidal(stella) and forall x (Sinusoidal(x) -> Sublime(x)) -> therefore Sublime(stella) Sublime(stella) and forall x (Sublime(x) -> Reported(x)) -> therefore Reported(stella) Reported(stella) and forall x (Reported(x) -> Honduran(x)) -> therefore Honduran(stella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Bertrand is stinging. Kassie is acentric. Kassie is gnomish. Kassie is mineral. Andres is stinging. Andres is gnomish. Andres is mineral. Evie is acentric. Evie is gnomish. Evie is depraved. Young people are honored. If Bertrand is acentric then Bertrand is mineral. Quiet people are depraved. If Bertrand is gnomish then Bertrand is mineral. If someone is stinging then they are gnomish. Cold, depraved people are humpbacked. Bertrand is not honored.", "logic": "\nStinging(bertrand)\nAcentric(kassie)\nGnomish(kassie)\nMineral(kassie)\nStinging(andres)\nGnomish(andres)\nMineral(andres)\nAcentric(evie)\nGnomish(evie)\nDepraved(evie)\nforall x (Depraved(x) -> Honored(x))\nAcentric(bertrand) -> Mineral(bertrand)\nforall x (Gnomish(x) -> Depraved(x))\nGnomish(bertrand) -> Mineral(bertrand)\nforall x (Stinging(x) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Acentric(x) and Depraved(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\n\nnot Honored(bertrand)\n\nStinging(bertrand) and forall x (Stinging(x) -> Gnomish(x)) -> therefore Gnomish(bertrand) Gnomish(bertrand) and forall x (Gnomish(x) -> Depraved(x)) -> therefore Depraved(bertrand) Depraved(bertrand) and forall x (Depraved(x) -> Honored(x)) -> therefore Honored(bertrand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Colline is nestorian. Elana is raunchy. Elana is mislaid. Elana is trousered. Dorice is nestorian. Dorice is mislaid. Dorice is trousered. Stoddard is raunchy. Stoddard is mislaid. Stoddard is aquiferous. Young people are titulary. If Colline is raunchy then Colline is trousered. Quiet people are aquiferous. If Colline is mislaid then Colline is trousered. If someone is nestorian then they are mislaid. Cold, aquiferous people are carnation. Dorice is not carnation.", "logic": "\nNestorian(colline)\nRaunchy(elana)\nMislaid(elana)\nTrousered(elana)\nNestorian(dorice)\nMislaid(dorice)\nTrousered(dorice)\nRaunchy(stoddard)\nMislaid(stoddard)\nAquiferous(stoddard)\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Titulary(x))\nRaunchy(colline) -> Trousered(colline)\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\nMislaid(colline) -> Trousered(colline)\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) and Aquiferous(x) -> Carnation(x))\n\nnot Carnation(dorice)\n\nforall x (Raunchy(x) and Aquiferous(x) -> Carnation(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Reg is coenobitic. Susi is authorized. Susi is motor. Susi is burning. Ellie is coenobitic. Ellie is motor. Ellie is burning. Milo is authorized. Milo is motor. Milo is peaked. Young people are sunburned. If Reg is authorized then Reg is burning. Quiet people are peaked. If Reg is motor then Reg is burning. If someone is coenobitic then they are motor. Cold, peaked people are orthopedic. Reg is orthopedic.", "logic": "\nCoenobitic(reg)\nAuthorized(susi)\nMotor(susi)\nBurning(susi)\nCoenobitic(ellie)\nMotor(ellie)\nBurning(ellie)\nAuthorized(milo)\nMotor(milo)\nPeaked(milo)\nforall x (Peaked(x) -> Sunburned(x))\nAuthorized(reg) -> Burning(reg)\nforall x (Motor(x) -> Peaked(x))\nMotor(reg) -> Burning(reg)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Peaked(x) -> Orthopedic(x))\n\nOrthopedic(reg)\n\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Peaked(x) -> Orthopedic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Jacquette is stringent. Gisella is yellowish. Gisella is surficial. Gisella is lavender. Myrtie is stringent. Myrtie is surficial. Myrtie is lavender. Tulley is yellowish. Tulley is surficial. Tulley is frequent. Young people are stemmatic. If Jacquette is yellowish then Jacquette is lavender. Quiet people are frequent. If Jacquette is surficial then Jacquette is lavender. If someone is stringent then they are surficial. Cold, frequent people are obovate. Tulley is not lavender.", "logic": "\nStringent(jacquette)\nYellowish(gisella)\nSurficial(gisella)\nLavender(gisella)\nStringent(myrtie)\nSurficial(myrtie)\nLavender(myrtie)\nYellowish(tulley)\nSurficial(tulley)\nFrequent(tulley)\nforall x (Frequent(x) -> Stemmatic(x))\nYellowish(jacquette) -> Lavender(jacquette)\nforall x (Surficial(x) -> Frequent(x))\nSurficial(jacquette) -> Lavender(jacquette)\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Surficial(x))\nforall x (Yellowish(x) and Frequent(x) -> Obovate(x))\n\nnot Lavender(tulley)\n\nnot Lavender(tulley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Jeanelle is ectopic. Johanna is sorcerous. Johanna is jumbo. Johanna is braced. Rhonda is ectopic. Rhonda is jumbo. Rhonda is braced. Carter is sorcerous. Carter is jumbo. Carter is stretchy. Young people are magyar. If Jeanelle is sorcerous then Jeanelle is braced. Quiet people are stretchy. If Jeanelle is jumbo then Jeanelle is braced. If someone is ectopic then they are jumbo. Cold, stretchy people are improvable. Johanna is ectopic.", "logic": "\nEctopic(jeanelle)\nSorcerous(johanna)\nJumbo(johanna)\nBraced(johanna)\nEctopic(rhonda)\nJumbo(rhonda)\nBraced(rhonda)\nSorcerous(carter)\nJumbo(carter)\nStretchy(carter)\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Magyar(x))\nSorcerous(jeanelle) -> Braced(jeanelle)\nforall x (Jumbo(x) -> Stretchy(x))\nJumbo(jeanelle) -> Braced(jeanelle)\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Jumbo(x))\nforall x (Sorcerous(x) and Stretchy(x) -> Improvable(x))\n\nEctopic(johanna)\n\nEctopic(johanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Emelita is autoimmune. Teodora is dreadful. Teodora is extravert. Teodora is bimonthly. Jania is autoimmune. Jania is extravert. Jania is bimonthly. Romonda is dreadful. Romonda is extravert. Romonda is pensive. Young people are sublingual. If Emelita is dreadful then Emelita is bimonthly. Quiet people are pensive. If Emelita is extravert then Emelita is bimonthly. If someone is autoimmune then they are extravert. Cold, pensive people are threadlike. Jania is not dreadful.", "logic": "\nAutoimmune(emelita)\nDreadful(teodora)\nExtravert(teodora)\nBimonthly(teodora)\nAutoimmune(jania)\nExtravert(jania)\nBimonthly(jania)\nDreadful(romonda)\nExtravert(romonda)\nPensive(romonda)\nforall x (Pensive(x) -> Sublingual(x))\nDreadful(emelita) -> Bimonthly(emelita)\nforall x (Extravert(x) -> Pensive(x))\nExtravert(emelita) -> Bimonthly(emelita)\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) and Pensive(x) -> Threadlike(x))\n\nnot Dreadful(jania)\n\nnot Dreadful(jania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Lynelle is hindering. Kessia is reticulate. Kessia is bulging. Kessia is varicose. Corky is hindering. Corky is bulging. Corky is varicose. Cosetta is reticulate. Cosetta is bulging. Cosetta is clausal. Young people are common. If Lynelle is reticulate then Lynelle is varicose. Quiet people are clausal. If Lynelle is bulging then Lynelle is varicose. If someone is hindering then they are bulging. Cold, clausal people are cervical. Lynelle is reticulate.", "logic": "\nHindering(lynelle)\nReticulate(kessia)\nBulging(kessia)\nVaricose(kessia)\nHindering(corky)\nBulging(corky)\nVaricose(corky)\nReticulate(cosetta)\nBulging(cosetta)\nClausal(cosetta)\nforall x (Clausal(x) -> Common(x))\nReticulate(lynelle) -> Varicose(lynelle)\nforall x (Bulging(x) -> Clausal(x))\nBulging(lynelle) -> Varicose(lynelle)\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Bulging(x))\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and Clausal(x) -> Cervical(x))\n\nReticulate(lynelle)\n\nReticulate(lynelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "The izzi reenact the klaus. The klaus is rapturous. The klaus graph the beck. The beck kneecap the mikael. The beck graph the mikael. The beck reenact the mikael. The mikael is romance. The mikael is topknotted. The mikael kneecap the beck. The mikael graph the klaus. If something reenact the klaus and it kneecap the klaus then the klaus reenact the beck. If something reenact the beck then it graph the izzi. If something kneecap the klaus then it reenact the klaus. If the izzi graph the beck and the beck is miscible then the beck kneecap the izzi. If something reenact the klaus then it kneecap the klaus. If the klaus kneecap the izzi and the izzi is miscible then the klaus kneecap the beck. If something is romance and it graph the klaus then the klaus is miscible. If something kneecap the beck then it graph the mikael. The beck graph the mikael.", "logic": "\nReenact(izzi, klaus)\nRapturous(klaus)\nGraph(klaus, beck)\nKneecap(beck, mikael)\nGraph(beck, mikael)\nReenact(beck, mikael)\nRomance(mikael)\nTopknotted(mikael)\nKneecap(mikael, beck)\nGraph(mikael, klaus)\nforall x (Reenact(x, klaus) and Kneecap(x, klaus) -> Reenact(klaus, beck))\nforall x (Reenact(x, beck) -> Graph(x, izzi))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, klaus) -> Reenact(x, klaus))\nGraph(izzi, beck) and Miscible(beck) -> Kneecap(beck, izzi)\nforall x (Reenact(x, klaus) -> Kneecap(x, klaus))\nKneecap(klaus, izzi) and Miscible(izzi) -> Kneecap(klaus, beck)\nforall x (Romance(x) and Graph(x, klaus) -> Miscible(klaus))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, beck) -> Graph(x, mikael))\n\nGraph(beck, mikael)\n\ntherefore Graph(beck, mikael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The katherine shrimp the giffy. The giffy is qualified. The giffy expiate the mortimer. The mortimer jump the morena. The mortimer expiate the morena. The mortimer shrimp the morena. The morena is unfair. The morena is bizonal. The morena jump the mortimer. The morena expiate the giffy. If something shrimp the giffy and it jump the giffy then the giffy shrimp the mortimer. If something shrimp the mortimer then it expiate the katherine. If something jump the giffy then it shrimp the giffy. If the katherine expiate the mortimer and the mortimer is spiny then the mortimer jump the katherine. If something shrimp the giffy then it jump the giffy. If the giffy jump the katherine and the katherine is spiny then the giffy jump the mortimer. If something is unfair and it expiate the giffy then the giffy is spiny. If something jump the mortimer then it expiate the morena. The giffy does not see the mortimer.", "logic": "\nShrimp(katherine, giffy)\nQualified(giffy)\nExpiate(giffy, mortimer)\nJump(mortimer, morena)\nExpiate(mortimer, morena)\nShrimp(mortimer, morena)\nUnfair(morena)\nBizonal(morena)\nJump(morena, mortimer)\nExpiate(morena, giffy)\nforall x (Shrimp(x, giffy) and Jump(x, giffy) -> Shrimp(giffy, mortimer))\nforall x (Shrimp(x, mortimer) -> Expiate(x, katherine))\nforall x (Jump(x, giffy) -> Shrimp(x, giffy))\nExpiate(katherine, mortimer) and Spiny(mortimer) -> Jump(mortimer, katherine)\nforall x (Shrimp(x, giffy) -> Jump(x, giffy))\nJump(giffy, katherine) and Spiny(katherine) -> Jump(giffy, mortimer)\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Expiate(x, giffy) -> Spiny(giffy))\nforall x (Jump(x, mortimer) -> Expiate(x, morena))\n\nnot Expiate(giffy, mortimer)\n\ntherefore Expiate(giffy, mortimer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The marsha scavenge the leonore. The leonore is gleeful. The leonore guggle the ardis. The ardis yack the brinkley. The ardis guggle the brinkley. The ardis scavenge the brinkley. The brinkley is inundated. The brinkley is tuneless. The brinkley yack the ardis. The brinkley guggle the leonore. If something scavenge the leonore and it yack the leonore then the leonore scavenge the ardis. If something scavenge the ardis then it guggle the marsha. If something yack the leonore then it scavenge the leonore. If the marsha guggle the ardis and the ardis is muggy then the ardis yack the marsha. If something scavenge the leonore then it yack the leonore. If the leonore yack the marsha and the marsha is muggy then the leonore yack the ardis. If something is inundated and it guggle the leonore then the leonore is muggy. If something yack the ardis then it guggle the brinkley. The brinkley guggle the brinkley.", "logic": "\nScavenge(marsha, leonore)\nGleeful(leonore)\nGuggle(leonore, ardis)\nYack(ardis, brinkley)\nGuggle(ardis, brinkley)\nScavenge(ardis, brinkley)\nInundated(brinkley)\nTuneless(brinkley)\nYack(brinkley, ardis)\nGuggle(brinkley, leonore)\nforall x (Scavenge(x, leonore) and Yack(x, leonore) -> Scavenge(leonore, ardis))\nforall x (Scavenge(x, ardis) -> Guggle(x, marsha))\nforall x (Yack(x, leonore) -> Scavenge(x, leonore))\nGuggle(marsha, ardis) and Muggy(ardis) -> Yack(ardis, marsha)\nforall x (Scavenge(x, leonore) -> Yack(x, leonore))\nYack(leonore, marsha) and Muggy(marsha) -> Yack(leonore, ardis)\nforall x (Inundated(x) and Guggle(x, leonore) -> Muggy(leonore))\nforall x (Yack(x, ardis) -> Guggle(x, brinkley))\n\nGuggle(brinkley, brinkley)\n\nYack(brinkley, ardis) and forall x (Yack(x, ardis) -> Guggle(x, brinkley)) -> therefore Guggle(brinkley, brinkley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The karrah verify the adrian. The adrian is dress. The adrian slough the linus. The linus signalize the franky. The linus slough the franky. The linus verify the franky. The franky is reticular. The franky is buttressed. The franky signalize the linus. The franky slough the adrian. If something verify the adrian and it signalize the adrian then the adrian verify the linus. If something verify the linus then it slough the karrah. If something signalize the adrian then it verify the adrian. If the karrah slough the linus and the linus is intangible then the linus signalize the karrah. If something verify the adrian then it signalize the adrian. If the adrian signalize the karrah and the karrah is intangible then the adrian signalize the linus. If something is reticular and it slough the adrian then the adrian is intangible. If something signalize the linus then it slough the franky. The karrah does not like the adrian.", "logic": "\nVerify(karrah, adrian)\nDress(adrian)\nSlough(adrian, linus)\nSignalize(linus, franky)\nSlough(linus, franky)\nVerify(linus, franky)\nReticular(franky)\nButtressed(franky)\nSignalize(franky, linus)\nSlough(franky, adrian)\nforall x (Verify(x, adrian) and Signalize(x, adrian) -> Verify(adrian, linus))\nforall x (Verify(x, linus) -> Slough(x, karrah))\nforall x (Signalize(x, adrian) -> Verify(x, adrian))\nSlough(karrah, linus) and Intangible(linus) -> Signalize(linus, karrah)\nforall x (Verify(x, adrian) -> Signalize(x, adrian))\nSignalize(adrian, karrah) and Intangible(karrah) -> Signalize(adrian, linus)\nforall x (Reticular(x) and Slough(x, adrian) -> Intangible(adrian))\nforall x (Signalize(x, linus) -> Slough(x, franky))\n\nnot Signalize(karrah, adrian)\n\nVerify(karrah, adrian) and forall x (Verify(x, adrian) -> Signalize(x, adrian)) -> therefore Signalize(karrah, adrian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The titos noise the byram. The byram is syntactic. The byram discern the desirae. The desirae behoove the corella. The desirae discern the corella. The desirae noise the corella. The corella is threadlike. The corella is frangible. The corella behoove the desirae. The corella discern the byram. If something noise the byram and it behoove the byram then the byram noise the desirae. If something noise the desirae then it discern the titos. If something behoove the byram then it noise the byram. If the titos discern the desirae and the desirae is trackless then the desirae behoove the titos. If something noise the byram then it behoove the byram. If the byram behoove the titos and the titos is trackless then the byram behoove the desirae. If something is threadlike and it discern the byram then the byram is trackless. If something behoove the desirae then it discern the corella. The byram noise the desirae.", "logic": "\nNoise(titos, byram)\nSyntactic(byram)\nDiscern(byram, desirae)\nBehoove(desirae, corella)\nDiscern(desirae, corella)\nNoise(desirae, corella)\nThreadlike(corella)\nFrangible(corella)\nBehoove(corella, desirae)\nDiscern(corella, byram)\nforall x (Noise(x, byram) and Behoove(x, byram) -> Noise(byram, desirae))\nforall x (Noise(x, desirae) -> Discern(x, titos))\nforall x (Behoove(x, byram) -> Noise(x, byram))\nDiscern(titos, desirae) and Trackless(desirae) -> Behoove(desirae, titos)\nforall x (Noise(x, byram) -> Behoove(x, byram))\nBehoove(byram, titos) and Trackless(titos) -> Behoove(byram, desirae)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and Discern(x, byram) -> Trackless(byram))\nforall x (Behoove(x, desirae) -> Discern(x, corella))\n\nNoise(byram, desirae)\n\nNoise(titos, byram) and forall x (Noise(x, byram) -> Behoove(x, byram)) -> therefore Behoove(titos, byram) Noise(titos, byram) and Behoove(titos, byram) and forall x (Noise(x, byram) and Behoove(x, byram) -> Noise(byram, desirae)) -> therefore Noise(byram, desirae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The emili boycott the gian. The gian is adjusted. The gian approach the adelaide. The adelaide part the kellsie. The adelaide approach the kellsie. The adelaide boycott the kellsie. The kellsie is bigheaded. The kellsie is unshaved. The kellsie part the adelaide. The kellsie approach the gian. If something boycott the gian and it part the gian then the gian boycott the adelaide. If something boycott the adelaide then it approach the emili. If something part the gian then it boycott the gian. If the emili approach the adelaide and the adelaide is newsworthy then the adelaide part the emili. If something boycott the gian then it part the gian. If the gian part the emili and the emili is newsworthy then the gian part the adelaide. If something is bigheaded and it approach the gian then the gian is newsworthy. If something part the adelaide then it approach the kellsie. The gian does not visit the adelaide.", "logic": "\nBoycott(emili, gian)\nAdjusted(gian)\nApproach(gian, adelaide)\nPart(adelaide, kellsie)\nApproach(adelaide, kellsie)\nBoycott(adelaide, kellsie)\nBigheaded(kellsie)\nUnshaved(kellsie)\nPart(kellsie, adelaide)\nApproach(kellsie, gian)\nforall x (Boycott(x, gian) and Part(x, gian) -> Boycott(gian, adelaide))\nforall x (Boycott(x, adelaide) -> Approach(x, emili))\nforall x (Part(x, gian) -> Boycott(x, gian))\nApproach(emili, adelaide) and Newsworthy(adelaide) -> Part(adelaide, emili)\nforall x (Boycott(x, gian) -> Part(x, gian))\nPart(gian, emili) and Newsworthy(emili) -> Part(gian, adelaide)\nforall x (Bigheaded(x) and Approach(x, gian) -> Newsworthy(gian))\nforall x (Part(x, adelaide) -> Approach(x, kellsie))\n\nnot Boycott(gian, adelaide)\n\nBoycott(emili, gian) and forall x (Boycott(x, gian) -> Part(x, gian)) -> therefore Part(emili, gian) Boycott(emili, gian) and Part(emili, gian) and forall x (Boycott(x, gian) and Part(x, gian) -> Boycott(gian, adelaide)) -> therefore Boycott(gian, adelaide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The norm stymy the fawnia. The fawnia is unalert. The fawnia claxon the garcon. The garcon line the nanny. The garcon claxon the nanny. The garcon stymy the nanny. The nanny is ineffable. The nanny is unstrung. The nanny line the garcon. The nanny claxon the fawnia. If something stymy the fawnia and it line the fawnia then the fawnia stymy the garcon. If something stymy the garcon then it claxon the norm. If something line the fawnia then it stymy the fawnia. If the norm claxon the garcon and the garcon is discovered then the garcon line the norm. If something stymy the fawnia then it line the fawnia. If the fawnia line the norm and the norm is discovered then the fawnia line the garcon. If something is ineffable and it claxon the fawnia then the fawnia is discovered. If something line the garcon then it claxon the nanny. The fawnia claxon the norm.", "logic": "\nStymy(norm, fawnia)\nUnalert(fawnia)\nClaxon(fawnia, garcon)\nLine(garcon, nanny)\nClaxon(garcon, nanny)\nStymy(garcon, nanny)\nIneffable(nanny)\nUnstrung(nanny)\nLine(nanny, garcon)\nClaxon(nanny, fawnia)\nforall x (Stymy(x, fawnia) and Line(x, fawnia) -> Stymy(fawnia, garcon))\nforall x (Stymy(x, garcon) -> Claxon(x, norm))\nforall x (Line(x, fawnia) -> Stymy(x, fawnia))\nClaxon(norm, garcon) and Discovered(garcon) -> Line(garcon, norm)\nforall x (Stymy(x, fawnia) -> Line(x, fawnia))\nLine(fawnia, norm) and Discovered(norm) -> Line(fawnia, garcon)\nforall x (Ineffable(x) and Claxon(x, fawnia) -> Discovered(fawnia))\nforall x (Line(x, garcon) -> Claxon(x, nanny))\n\nClaxon(fawnia, norm)\n\nStymy(norm, fawnia) and forall x (Stymy(x, fawnia) -> Line(x, fawnia)) -> therefore Line(norm, fawnia) Stymy(norm, fawnia) and Line(norm, fawnia) and forall x (Stymy(x, fawnia) and Line(x, fawnia) -> Stymy(fawnia, garcon)) -> therefore Stymy(fawnia, garcon) Stymy(fawnia, garcon) and forall x (Stymy(x, garcon) -> Claxon(x, norm)) -> therefore Claxon(fawnia, norm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The freida disoblige the karissa. The karissa is bandy. The karissa cede the farley. The farley devilize the therese. The farley cede the therese. The farley disoblige the therese. The therese is fusible. The therese is puberulent. The therese devilize the farley. The therese cede the karissa. If something disoblige the karissa and it devilize the karissa then the karissa disoblige the farley. If something disoblige the farley then it cede the freida. If something devilize the karissa then it disoblige the karissa. If the freida cede the farley and the farley is sinhalese then the farley devilize the freida. If something disoblige the karissa then it devilize the karissa. If the karissa devilize the freida and the freida is sinhalese then the karissa devilize the farley. If something is fusible and it cede the karissa then the karissa is sinhalese. If something devilize the farley then it cede the therese. The karissa does not see the freida.", "logic": "\nDisoblige(freida, karissa)\nBandy(karissa)\nCede(karissa, farley)\nDevilize(farley, therese)\nCede(farley, therese)\nDisoblige(farley, therese)\nFusible(therese)\nPuberulent(therese)\nDevilize(therese, farley)\nCede(therese, karissa)\nforall x (Disoblige(x, karissa) and Devilize(x, karissa) -> Disoblige(karissa, farley))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, farley) -> Cede(x, freida))\nforall x (Devilize(x, karissa) -> Disoblige(x, karissa))\nCede(freida, farley) and Sinhalese(farley) -> Devilize(farley, freida)\nforall x (Disoblige(x, karissa) -> Devilize(x, karissa))\nDevilize(karissa, freida) and Sinhalese(freida) -> Devilize(karissa, farley)\nforall x (Fusible(x) and Cede(x, karissa) -> Sinhalese(karissa))\nforall x (Devilize(x, farley) -> Cede(x, therese))\n\nnot Cede(karissa, freida)\n\nDisoblige(freida, karissa) and forall x (Disoblige(x, karissa) -> Devilize(x, karissa)) -> therefore Devilize(freida, karissa) Disoblige(freida, karissa) and Devilize(freida, karissa) and forall x (Disoblige(x, karissa) and Devilize(x, karissa) -> Disoblige(karissa, farley)) -> therefore Disoblige(karissa, farley) Disoblige(karissa, farley) and forall x (Disoblige(x, farley) -> Cede(x, freida)) -> therefore Cede(karissa, freida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The darell vandalize the rene. The rene is postural. The rene barbecue the atalanta. The atalanta cabal the gwyn. The atalanta barbecue the gwyn. The atalanta vandalize the gwyn. The gwyn is marketable. The gwyn is animate. The gwyn cabal the atalanta. The gwyn barbecue the rene. If something vandalize the rene and it cabal the rene then the rene vandalize the atalanta. If something vandalize the atalanta then it barbecue the darell. If something cabal the rene then it vandalize the rene. If the darell barbecue the atalanta and the atalanta is cathodic then the atalanta cabal the darell. If something vandalize the rene then it cabal the rene. If the rene cabal the darell and the darell is cathodic then the rene cabal the atalanta. If something is marketable and it barbecue the rene then the rene is cathodic. If something cabal the atalanta then it barbecue the gwyn. The rene does not like the rene.", "logic": "\nVandalize(darell, rene)\nPostural(rene)\nBarbecue(rene, atalanta)\nCabal(atalanta, gwyn)\nBarbecue(atalanta, gwyn)\nVandalize(atalanta, gwyn)\nMarketable(gwyn)\nAnimate(gwyn)\nCabal(gwyn, atalanta)\nBarbecue(gwyn, rene)\nforall x (Vandalize(x, rene) and Cabal(x, rene) -> Vandalize(rene, atalanta))\nforall x (Vandalize(x, atalanta) -> Barbecue(x, darell))\nforall x (Cabal(x, rene) -> Vandalize(x, rene))\nBarbecue(darell, atalanta) and Cathodic(atalanta) -> Cabal(atalanta, darell)\nforall x (Vandalize(x, rene) -> Cabal(x, rene))\nCabal(rene, darell) and Cathodic(darell) -> Cabal(rene, atalanta)\nforall x (Marketable(x) and Barbecue(x, rene) -> Cathodic(rene))\nforall x (Cabal(x, atalanta) -> Barbecue(x, gwyn))\n\nnot Cabal(rene, rene)\n\nforall x (Vandalize(x, rene) -> Cabal(x, rene)) <- forall x (Cabal(x, rene) -> Vandalize(x, rene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The taber ration the dulcea. The dulcea is dropsical. The dulcea reflate the audie. The audie automobile the edgardo. The audie reflate the edgardo. The audie ration the edgardo. The edgardo is nappy. The edgardo is pyrolytic. The edgardo automobile the audie. The edgardo reflate the dulcea. If something ration the dulcea and it automobile the dulcea then the dulcea ration the audie. If something ration the audie then it reflate the taber. If something automobile the dulcea then it ration the dulcea. If the taber reflate the audie and the audie is indecisive then the audie automobile the taber. If something ration the dulcea then it automobile the dulcea. If the dulcea automobile the taber and the taber is indecisive then the dulcea automobile the audie. If something is nappy and it reflate the dulcea then the dulcea is indecisive. If something automobile the audie then it reflate the edgardo. The dulcea automobile the audie.", "logic": "\nRation(taber, dulcea)\nDropsical(dulcea)\nReflate(dulcea, audie)\nAutomobile(audie, edgardo)\nReflate(audie, edgardo)\nRation(audie, edgardo)\nNappy(edgardo)\nPyrolytic(edgardo)\nAutomobile(edgardo, audie)\nReflate(edgardo, dulcea)\nforall x (Ration(x, dulcea) and Automobile(x, dulcea) -> Ration(dulcea, audie))\nforall x (Ration(x, audie) -> Reflate(x, taber))\nforall x (Automobile(x, dulcea) -> Ration(x, dulcea))\nReflate(taber, audie) and Indecisive(audie) -> Automobile(audie, taber)\nforall x (Ration(x, dulcea) -> Automobile(x, dulcea))\nAutomobile(dulcea, taber) and Indecisive(taber) -> Automobile(dulcea, audie)\nforall x (Nappy(x) and Reflate(x, dulcea) -> Indecisive(dulcea))\nforall x (Automobile(x, audie) -> Reflate(x, edgardo))\n\nAutomobile(dulcea, audie)\n\nAutomobile(dulcea, taber) and Indecisive(taber) -> Automobile(dulcea, audie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The ivette skin the timothee. The timothee is picaresque. The timothee overturn the isidore. The isidore straiten the chen. The isidore overturn the chen. The isidore skin the chen. The chen is latent. The chen is setaceous. The chen straiten the isidore. The chen overturn the timothee. If something skin the timothee and it straiten the timothee then the timothee skin the isidore. If something skin the isidore then it overturn the ivette. If something straiten the timothee then it skin the timothee. If the ivette overturn the isidore and the isidore is protestant then the isidore straiten the ivette. If something skin the timothee then it straiten the timothee. If the timothee straiten the ivette and the ivette is protestant then the timothee straiten the isidore. If something is latent and it overturn the timothee then the timothee is protestant. If something straiten the isidore then it overturn the chen. The isidore does not like the timothee.", "logic": "\nSkin(ivette, timothee)\nPicaresque(timothee)\nOverturn(timothee, isidore)\nStraiten(isidore, chen)\nOverturn(isidore, chen)\nSkin(isidore, chen)\nLatent(chen)\nSetaceous(chen)\nStraiten(chen, isidore)\nOverturn(chen, timothee)\nforall x (Skin(x, timothee) and Straiten(x, timothee) -> Skin(timothee, isidore))\nforall x (Skin(x, isidore) -> Overturn(x, ivette))\nforall x (Straiten(x, timothee) -> Skin(x, timothee))\nOverturn(ivette, isidore) and Protestant(isidore) -> Straiten(isidore, ivette)\nforall x (Skin(x, timothee) -> Straiten(x, timothee))\nStraiten(timothee, ivette) and Protestant(ivette) -> Straiten(timothee, isidore)\nforall x (Latent(x) and Overturn(x, timothee) -> Protestant(timothee))\nforall x (Straiten(x, isidore) -> Overturn(x, chen))\n\nnot Straiten(isidore, timothee)\n\nforall x (Skin(x, timothee) -> Straiten(x, timothee)) <- forall x (Straiten(x, timothee) -> Skin(x, timothee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The chrissy obtain the albertina. The albertina is pilary. The albertina graduate the kiah. The kiah deprecate the daryn. The kiah graduate the daryn. The kiah obtain the daryn. The daryn is injurious. The daryn is cosmic. The daryn deprecate the kiah. The daryn graduate the albertina. If something obtain the albertina and it deprecate the albertina then the albertina obtain the kiah. If something obtain the kiah then it graduate the chrissy. If something deprecate the albertina then it obtain the albertina. If the chrissy graduate the kiah and the kiah is allegoric then the kiah deprecate the chrissy. If something obtain the albertina then it deprecate the albertina. If the albertina deprecate the chrissy and the chrissy is allegoric then the albertina deprecate the kiah. If something is injurious and it graduate the albertina then the albertina is allegoric. If something deprecate the kiah then it graduate the daryn. The kiah obtain the albertina.", "logic": "\nObtain(chrissy, albertina)\nPilary(albertina)\nGraduate(albertina, kiah)\nDeprecate(kiah, daryn)\nGraduate(kiah, daryn)\nObtain(kiah, daryn)\nInjurious(daryn)\nCosmic(daryn)\nDeprecate(daryn, kiah)\nGraduate(daryn, albertina)\nforall x (Obtain(x, albertina) and Deprecate(x, albertina) -> Obtain(albertina, kiah))\nforall x (Obtain(x, kiah) -> Graduate(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Deprecate(x, albertina) -> Obtain(x, albertina))\nGraduate(chrissy, kiah) and Allegoric(kiah) -> Deprecate(kiah, chrissy)\nforall x (Obtain(x, albertina) -> Deprecate(x, albertina))\nDeprecate(albertina, chrissy) and Allegoric(chrissy) -> Deprecate(albertina, kiah)\nforall x (Injurious(x) and Graduate(x, albertina) -> Allegoric(albertina))\nforall x (Deprecate(x, kiah) -> Graduate(x, daryn))\n\nObtain(kiah, albertina)\n\nforall x (Deprecate(x, albertina) -> Obtain(x, albertina)) <- forall x (Obtain(x, albertina) -> Deprecate(x, albertina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The louis beleaguer the wallas. The wallas is riled. The wallas pleach the kiele. The kiele disgruntle the nissie. The kiele pleach the nissie. The kiele beleaguer the nissie. The nissie is tinkling. The nissie is unmilitary. The nissie disgruntle the kiele. The nissie pleach the wallas. If something beleaguer the wallas and it disgruntle the wallas then the wallas beleaguer the kiele. If something beleaguer the kiele then it pleach the louis. If something disgruntle the wallas then it beleaguer the wallas. If the louis pleach the kiele and the kiele is shivery then the kiele disgruntle the louis. If something beleaguer the wallas then it disgruntle the wallas. If the wallas disgruntle the louis and the louis is shivery then the wallas disgruntle the kiele. If something is tinkling and it pleach the wallas then the wallas is shivery. If something disgruntle the kiele then it pleach the nissie. The nissie does not see the kiele.", "logic": "\nBeleaguer(louis, wallas)\nRiled(wallas)\nPleach(wallas, kiele)\nDisgruntle(kiele, nissie)\nPleach(kiele, nissie)\nBeleaguer(kiele, nissie)\nTinkling(nissie)\nUnmilitary(nissie)\nDisgruntle(nissie, kiele)\nPleach(nissie, wallas)\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, wallas) and Disgruntle(x, wallas) -> Beleaguer(wallas, kiele))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, kiele) -> Pleach(x, louis))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, wallas) -> Beleaguer(x, wallas))\nPleach(louis, kiele) and Shivery(kiele) -> Disgruntle(kiele, louis)\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, wallas) -> Disgruntle(x, wallas))\nDisgruntle(wallas, louis) and Shivery(louis) -> Disgruntle(wallas, kiele)\nforall x (Tinkling(x) and Pleach(x, wallas) -> Shivery(wallas))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, kiele) -> Pleach(x, nissie))\n\nnot Pleach(nissie, kiele)\n\nnot Pleach(nissie, kiele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The jemmie revisit the cesya. The cesya is unearthly. The cesya yack the gaven. The gaven forego the neille. The gaven yack the neille. The gaven revisit the neille. The neille is woven. The neille is xxxv. The neille forego the gaven. The neille yack the cesya. If something revisit the cesya and it forego the cesya then the cesya revisit the gaven. If something revisit the gaven then it yack the jemmie. If something forego the cesya then it revisit the cesya. If the jemmie yack the gaven and the gaven is unlatched then the gaven forego the jemmie. If something revisit the cesya then it forego the cesya. If the cesya forego the jemmie and the jemmie is unlatched then the cesya forego the gaven. If something is woven and it yack the cesya then the cesya is unlatched. If something forego the gaven then it yack the neille. The cesya forego the neille.", "logic": "\nRevisit(jemmie, cesya)\nUnearthly(cesya)\nYack(cesya, gaven)\nForego(gaven, neille)\nYack(gaven, neille)\nRevisit(gaven, neille)\nWoven(neille)\nXxxv(neille)\nForego(neille, gaven)\nYack(neille, cesya)\nforall x (Revisit(x, cesya) and Forego(x, cesya) -> Revisit(cesya, gaven))\nforall x (Revisit(x, gaven) -> Yack(x, jemmie))\nforall x (Forego(x, cesya) -> Revisit(x, cesya))\nYack(jemmie, gaven) and Unlatched(gaven) -> Forego(gaven, jemmie)\nforall x (Revisit(x, cesya) -> Forego(x, cesya))\nForego(cesya, jemmie) and Unlatched(jemmie) -> Forego(cesya, gaven)\nforall x (Woven(x) and Yack(x, cesya) -> Unlatched(cesya))\nforall x (Forego(x, gaven) -> Yack(x, neille))\n\nForego(cesya, neille)\n\nForego(cesya, neille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The aleecia connote the sheri. The sheri is cancelled. The sheri plead the lita. The lita excrete the rivi. The lita plead the rivi. The lita connote the rivi. The rivi is recluse. The rivi is rectal. The rivi excrete the lita. The rivi plead the sheri. If something connote the sheri and it excrete the sheri then the sheri connote the lita. If something connote the lita then it plead the aleecia. If something excrete the sheri then it connote the sheri. If the aleecia plead the lita and the lita is vicious then the lita excrete the aleecia. If something connote the sheri then it excrete the sheri. If the sheri excrete the aleecia and the aleecia is vicious then the sheri excrete the lita. If something is recluse and it plead the sheri then the sheri is vicious. If something excrete the lita then it plead the rivi. The sheri does not visit the rivi.", "logic": "\nConnote(aleecia, sheri)\nCancelled(sheri)\nPlead(sheri, lita)\nExcrete(lita, rivi)\nPlead(lita, rivi)\nConnote(lita, rivi)\nRecluse(rivi)\nRectal(rivi)\nExcrete(rivi, lita)\nPlead(rivi, sheri)\nforall x (Connote(x, sheri) and Excrete(x, sheri) -> Connote(sheri, lita))\nforall x (Connote(x, lita) -> Plead(x, aleecia))\nforall x (Excrete(x, sheri) -> Connote(x, sheri))\nPlead(aleecia, lita) and Vicious(lita) -> Excrete(lita, aleecia)\nforall x (Connote(x, sheri) -> Excrete(x, sheri))\nExcrete(sheri, aleecia) and Vicious(aleecia) -> Excrete(sheri, lita)\nforall x (Recluse(x) and Plead(x, sheri) -> Vicious(sheri))\nforall x (Excrete(x, lita) -> Plead(x, rivi))\n\nnot Connote(sheri, rivi)\n\nnot Connote(sheri, rivi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The nike frizzle the laverna. The laverna is dentate. The laverna redline the rocky. The rocky rubricate the emmi. The rocky redline the emmi. The rocky frizzle the emmi. The emmi is holey. The emmi is refreshing. The emmi rubricate the rocky. The emmi redline the laverna. If something frizzle the laverna and it rubricate the laverna then the laverna frizzle the rocky. If something frizzle the rocky then it redline the nike. If something rubricate the laverna then it frizzle the laverna. If the nike redline the rocky and the rocky is dosed then the rocky rubricate the nike. If something frizzle the laverna then it rubricate the laverna. If the laverna rubricate the nike and the nike is dosed then the laverna rubricate the rocky. If something is holey and it redline the laverna then the laverna is dosed. If something rubricate the rocky then it redline the emmi. The emmi frizzle the emmi.", "logic": "\nFrizzle(nike, laverna)\nDentate(laverna)\nRedline(laverna, rocky)\nRubricate(rocky, emmi)\nRedline(rocky, emmi)\nFrizzle(rocky, emmi)\nHoley(emmi)\nRefreshing(emmi)\nRubricate(emmi, rocky)\nRedline(emmi, laverna)\nforall x (Frizzle(x, laverna) and Rubricate(x, laverna) -> Frizzle(laverna, rocky))\nforall x (Frizzle(x, rocky) -> Redline(x, nike))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, laverna) -> Frizzle(x, laverna))\nRedline(nike, rocky) and Dosed(rocky) -> Rubricate(rocky, nike)\nforall x (Frizzle(x, laverna) -> Rubricate(x, laverna))\nRubricate(laverna, nike) and Dosed(nike) -> Rubricate(laverna, rocky)\nforall x (Holey(x) and Redline(x, laverna) -> Dosed(laverna))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, rocky) -> Redline(x, emmi))\n\nFrizzle(emmi, emmi)\n\nFrizzle(emmi, emmi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "Shepperd is electric. Joel is eolotropic. Astra is axonal. All eolotropic things are electric. Red, uric things are not electric. If something is ilxx then it is axonal. Young things are axonal. If something is haughty then it is not eolotropic. Nice things are ilxx. Astra is axonal.", "logic": "\nElectric(shepperd)\nEolotropic(joel)\nAxonal(astra)\nforall x (Eolotropic(x) -> Electric(x))\nforall x (Eolotropic(x) and Uric(x) -> not Electric(x))\nforall x (Ilxx(x) -> Axonal(x))\nforall x (Haughty(x) -> Axonal(x))\nforall x (Haughty(x) -> not Eolotropic(x))\nforall x (Electric(x) -> Ilxx(x))\n\nAxonal(astra)\n\ntherefore Axonal(astra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Barnett is expansible. Pavel is crabbed. Sharyl is roughish. All crabbed things are expansible. Red, subaqueous things are not expansible. If something is elongate then it is roughish. Young things are roughish. If something is rummy then it is not crabbed. Nice things are elongate. Barnett is not expansible.", "logic": "\nExpansible(barnett)\nCrabbed(pavel)\nRoughish(sharyl)\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Expansible(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) and Subaqueous(x) -> not Expansible(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Rummy(x) -> not Crabbed(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Elongate(x))\n\nnot Expansible(barnett)\n\ntherefore Expansible(barnett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Chancey is trying. Izabel is cultured. Tiffanie is empurpled. All cultured things are trying. Red, unemployed things are not trying. If something is eutherian then it is empurpled. Young things are empurpled. If something is carotid then it is not cultured. Nice things are eutherian. Chancey is eutherian.", "logic": "\nTrying(chancey)\nCultured(izabel)\nEmpurpled(tiffanie)\nforall x (Cultured(x) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Cultured(x) and Unemployed(x) -> not Trying(x))\nforall x (Eutherian(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> not Cultured(x))\nforall x (Trying(x) -> Eutherian(x))\n\nEutherian(chancey)\n\nTrying(chancey) and forall x (Trying(x) -> Eutherian(x)) -> therefore Eutherian(chancey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Shelley is woebegone. Barthel is noncyclic. Lil is spotted. All noncyclic things are woebegone. Red, baptismal things are not woebegone. If something is outraged then it is spotted. Young things are spotted. If something is unconfined then it is not noncyclic. Nice things are outraged. Barthel is not woebegone.", "logic": "\nWoebegone(shelley)\nNoncyclic(barthel)\nSpotted(lil)\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Woebegone(x))\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) and Baptismal(x) -> not Woebegone(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) -> Spotted(x))\nforall x (Unconfined(x) -> Spotted(x))\nforall x (Unconfined(x) -> not Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Woebegone(x) -> Outraged(x))\n\nnot Woebegone(barthel)\n\nNoncyclic(barthel) and forall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Woebegone(x)) -> therefore Woebegone(barthel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Grete is terrific. Adolphe is capsulate. Lawrence is esteemed. All capsulate things are terrific. Red, lanate things are not terrific. If something is seventh then it is esteemed. Young things are esteemed. If something is inlaid then it is not capsulate. Nice things are seventh. Grete is esteemed.", "logic": "\nTerrific(grete)\nCapsulate(adolphe)\nEsteemed(lawrence)\nforall x (Capsulate(x) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Capsulate(x) and Lanate(x) -> not Terrific(x))\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> not Capsulate(x))\nforall x (Terrific(x) -> Seventh(x))\n\nEsteemed(grete)\n\nTerrific(grete) and forall x (Terrific(x) -> Seventh(x)) -> therefore Seventh(grete) Seventh(grete) and forall x (Seventh(x) -> Esteemed(x)) -> therefore Esteemed(grete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Storm is northward. Lay is anabiotic. Larry is bifocal. All anabiotic things are northward. Red, wieldy things are not northward. If something is unpunctual then it is bifocal. Young things are bifocal. If something is sewn then it is not anabiotic. Nice things are unpunctual. Storm is not bifocal.", "logic": "\nNorthward(storm)\nAnabiotic(lay)\nBifocal(larry)\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) -> Northward(x))\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and Wieldy(x) -> not Northward(x))\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Bifocal(x))\nforall x (Sewn(x) -> Bifocal(x))\nforall x (Sewn(x) -> not Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Northward(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\n\nnot Bifocal(storm)\n\nNorthward(storm) and forall x (Northward(x) -> Unpunctual(x)) -> therefore Unpunctual(storm) Unpunctual(storm) and forall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Bifocal(x)) -> therefore Bifocal(storm)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Keeley is initiative. Hamil is bibless. Laurance is bored. All bibless things are initiative. Red, twilight things are not initiative. If something is lusitanian then it is bored. Young things are bored. If something is clownish then it is not bibless. Nice things are lusitanian. Hamil is bored.", "logic": "\nInitiative(keeley)\nBibless(hamil)\nBored(laurance)\nforall x (Bibless(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Bibless(x) and Twilight(x) -> not Initiative(x))\nforall x (Lusitanian(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Clownish(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Clownish(x) -> not Bibless(x))\nforall x (Initiative(x) -> Lusitanian(x))\n\nBored(hamil)\n\nBibless(hamil) and forall x (Bibless(x) -> Initiative(x)) -> therefore Initiative(hamil) Initiative(hamil) and forall x (Initiative(x) -> Lusitanian(x)) -> therefore Lusitanian(hamil) Lusitanian(hamil) and forall x (Lusitanian(x) -> Bored(x)) -> therefore Bored(hamil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Melisent is past. Gregg is sculptural. Anabel is motive. All sculptural things are past. Red, calendered things are not past. If something is nonlethal then it is motive. Young things are motive. If something is unpassable then it is not sculptural. Nice things are nonlethal. Gregg is not motive.", "logic": "\nPast(melisent)\nSculptural(gregg)\nMotive(anabel)\nforall x (Sculptural(x) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) and Calendered(x) -> not Past(x))\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> not Sculptural(x))\nforall x (Past(x) -> Nonlethal(x))\n\nnot Motive(gregg)\n\nSculptural(gregg) and forall x (Sculptural(x) -> Past(x)) -> therefore Past(gregg) Past(gregg) and forall x (Past(x) -> Nonlethal(x)) -> therefore Nonlethal(gregg) Nonlethal(gregg) and forall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Motive(x)) -> therefore Motive(gregg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Rosemaria is abyssal. Giuseppe is branchless. Alica is benefic. All branchless things are abyssal. Red, outboard things are not abyssal. If something is feasible then it is benefic. Young things are benefic. If something is humourous then it is not branchless. Nice things are feasible. Alica is not feasible.", "logic": "\nAbyssal(rosemaria)\nBranchless(giuseppe)\nBenefic(alica)\nforall x (Branchless(x) -> Abyssal(x))\nforall x (Branchless(x) and Outboard(x) -> not Abyssal(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Humourous(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Humourous(x) -> not Branchless(x))\nforall x (Abyssal(x) -> Feasible(x))\n\nnot Feasible(alica)\n\nforall x (Abyssal(x) -> Feasible(x)) <- forall x (Branchless(x) -> Abyssal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Sharna is orwellian. Blondell is steepish. Zed is impressive. All steepish things are orwellian. Red, flakey things are not orwellian. If something is mangy then it is impressive. Young things are impressive. If something is beat then it is not steepish. Nice things are mangy. Zed is orwellian.", "logic": "\nOrwellian(sharna)\nSteepish(blondell)\nImpressive(zed)\nforall x (Steepish(x) -> Orwellian(x))\nforall x (Steepish(x) and Flakey(x) -> not Orwellian(x))\nforall x (Mangy(x) -> Impressive(x))\nforall x (Beat(x) -> Impressive(x))\nforall x (Beat(x) -> not Steepish(x))\nforall x (Orwellian(x) -> Mangy(x))\n\nOrwellian(zed)\n\nforall x (Steepish(x) -> Orwellian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Blakeley is shinto. Danica is oaten. Tymon is respective. All oaten things are shinto. Red, terefah things are not shinto. If something is upcountry then it is respective. Young things are respective. If something is blanketed then it is not oaten. Nice things are upcountry. Blakeley is not oaten.", "logic": "\nShinto(blakeley)\nOaten(danica)\nRespective(tymon)\nforall x (Oaten(x) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Oaten(x) and Terefah(x) -> not Shinto(x))\nforall x (Upcountry(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> not Oaten(x))\nforall x (Shinto(x) -> Upcountry(x))\n\nnot Oaten(blakeley)\n\nnot Oaten(blakeley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Joella is devilish. Benito is isotropic. Bronson is tied. All isotropic things are devilish. Red, stiff things are not devilish. If something is acentric then it is tied. Young things are tied. If something is stray then it is not isotropic. Nice things are acentric. Benito is rough.", "logic": "\nDevilish(joella)\nIsotropic(benito)\nTied(bronson)\nforall x (Isotropic(x) -> Devilish(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Stiff(x) -> not Devilish(x))\nforall x (Acentric(x) -> Tied(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) -> Tied(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) -> not Isotropic(x))\nforall x (Devilish(x) -> Acentric(x))\n\nRough(benito)\n\nRough(benito) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Ilyse is incorrupt. Micheline is humic. Rennie is voidable. All humic things are incorrupt. Red, ruled things are not incorrupt. If something is main then it is voidable. Young things are voidable. If something is blastemic then it is not humic. Nice things are main. Micheline is not blastemic.", "logic": "\nIncorrupt(ilyse)\nHumic(micheline)\nVoidable(rennie)\nforall x (Humic(x) -> Incorrupt(x))\nforall x (Humic(x) and Ruled(x) -> not Incorrupt(x))\nforall x (Main(x) -> Voidable(x))\nforall x (Blastemic(x) -> Voidable(x))\nforall x (Blastemic(x) -> not Humic(x))\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Main(x))\n\nnot Blastemic(micheline)\n\nnot Blastemic(micheline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Delly is refined. Isadora is unprepared. Bartel is contrived. All unprepared things are refined. Red, utter things are not refined. If something is soughing then it is contrived. Young things are contrived. If something is swooning then it is not unprepared. Nice things are soughing. Bartel is utter.", "logic": "\nRefined(delly)\nUnprepared(isadora)\nContrived(bartel)\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) and Utter(x) -> not Refined(x))\nforall x (Soughing(x) -> Contrived(x))\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> Contrived(x))\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> not Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Soughing(x))\n\nUtter(bartel)\n\nUtter(bartel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Broderic is pessimal. Winna is teachable. Garey is snub. All teachable things are pessimal. Red, skim things are not pessimal. If something is roughdried then it is snub. Young things are snub. If something is highbrowed then it is not teachable. Nice things are roughdried. Broderic is not rough.", "logic": "\nPessimal(broderic)\nTeachable(winna)\nSnub(garey)\nforall x (Teachable(x) -> Pessimal(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) and Skim(x) -> not Pessimal(x))\nforall x (Roughdried(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Highbrowed(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Highbrowed(x) -> not Teachable(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> Roughdried(x))\n\nnot Rough(broderic)\n\nnot Rough(broderic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Barbie is blustery. Shina is igneous. Jolyn is fahrenheit. All igneous things are blustery. Red, unwished things are not blustery. If something is groveling then it is fahrenheit. Young things are fahrenheit. If something is operculate then it is not igneous. Nice things are groveling. Barbie is operculate.", "logic": "\nBlustery(barbie)\nIgneous(shina)\nFahrenheit(jolyn)\nforall x (Igneous(x) -> Blustery(x))\nforall x (Igneous(x) and Unwished(x) -> not Blustery(x))\nforall x (Groveling(x) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) -> not Igneous(x))\nforall x (Blustery(x) -> Groveling(x))\n\nOperculate(barbie)\n\nOperculate(barbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The elianore is feverous. The sharla wipe the elianore. The hamil bald the zane. The zane is unharmed. If something is feverous and it pretend the sharla then it bald the elianore. If something wipe the elianore then the elianore bald the hamil. If something bald the hamil then the hamil is beggarly. If something pretend the elianore then it wipe the sharla. If something is beggarly then it bald the sharla. If something is romanian then it bald the sharla. The zane is unharmed.", "logic": "\nFeverous(elianore)\nWipe(sharla, elianore)\nBald(hamil, zane)\nUnharmed(zane)\nforall x (Feverous(x) and Pretend(x, sharla) -> Bald(x, elianore))\nforall x (Wipe(x, elianore) -> Bald(elianore, hamil))\nforall x (Bald(x, hamil) -> Beggarly(hamil))\nforall x (Pretend(x, elianore) -> Wipe(x, sharla))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Bald(x, sharla))\nforall x (Romanian(x) -> Bald(x, sharla))\n\nUnharmed(zane)\n\ntherefore Unharmed(zane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The michelina is haggard. The elisabet poetize the michelina. The hally beleaguer the hailey. The hailey is recluse. If something is haggard and it brag the elisabet then it beleaguer the michelina. If something poetize the michelina then the michelina beleaguer the hally. If something beleaguer the hally then the hally is volitional. If something brag the michelina then it poetize the elisabet. If something is volitional then it beleaguer the elisabet. If something is apsidal then it beleaguer the elisabet. The hailey is not recluse.", "logic": "\nHaggard(michelina)\nPoetize(elisabet, michelina)\nBeleaguer(hally, hailey)\nRecluse(hailey)\nforall x (Haggard(x) and Brag(x, elisabet) -> Beleaguer(x, michelina))\nforall x (Poetize(x, michelina) -> Beleaguer(michelina, hally))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, hally) -> Volitional(hally))\nforall x (Brag(x, michelina) -> Poetize(x, elisabet))\nforall x (Volitional(x) -> Beleaguer(x, elisabet))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) -> Beleaguer(x, elisabet))\n\nnot Recluse(hailey)\n\ntherefore Recluse(hailey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The ricca is orientated. The cari blitz the ricca. The zolly serenade the osgood. The osgood is intriguing. If something is orientated and it childproof the cari then it serenade the ricca. If something blitz the ricca then the ricca serenade the zolly. If something serenade the zolly then the zolly is semipublic. If something childproof the ricca then it blitz the cari. If something is semipublic then it serenade the cari. If something is professed then it serenade the cari. The ricca serenade the zolly.", "logic": "\nOrientated(ricca)\nBlitz(cari, ricca)\nSerenade(zolly, osgood)\nIntriguing(osgood)\nforall x (Orientated(x) and Childproof(x, cari) -> Serenade(x, ricca))\nforall x (Blitz(x, ricca) -> Serenade(ricca, zolly))\nforall x (Serenade(x, zolly) -> Semipublic(zolly))\nforall x (Childproof(x, ricca) -> Blitz(x, cari))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) -> Serenade(x, cari))\nforall x (Professed(x) -> Serenade(x, cari))\n\nSerenade(ricca, zolly)\n\nBlitz(cari, ricca) and forall x (Blitz(x, ricca) -> Serenade(ricca, zolly)) -> therefore Serenade(ricca, zolly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The heide is unilateral. The julius sovietise the heide. The tate surveil the sabra. The sabra is auditory. If something is unilateral and it promenade the julius then it surveil the heide. If something sovietise the heide then the heide surveil the tate. If something surveil the tate then the tate is armorial. If something promenade the heide then it sovietise the julius. If something is armorial then it surveil the julius. If something is prurient then it surveil the julius. The heide does not eat the tate.", "logic": "\nUnilateral(heide)\nSovietise(julius, heide)\nSurveil(tate, sabra)\nAuditory(sabra)\nforall x (Unilateral(x) and Promenade(x, julius) -> Surveil(x, heide))\nforall x (Sovietise(x, heide) -> Surveil(heide, tate))\nforall x (Surveil(x, tate) -> Armorial(tate))\nforall x (Promenade(x, heide) -> Sovietise(x, julius))\nforall x (Armorial(x) -> Surveil(x, julius))\nforall x (Prurient(x) -> Surveil(x, julius))\n\nnot Surveil(heide, tate)\n\nSovietise(julius, heide) and forall x (Sovietise(x, heide) -> Surveil(heide, tate)) -> therefore Surveil(heide, tate)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The gilli is deterrent. The erhart cooperate the gilli. The madelin globalize the clari. The clari is despicable. If something is deterrent and it room the erhart then it globalize the gilli. If something cooperate the gilli then the gilli globalize the madelin. If something globalize the madelin then the madelin is toothless. If something room the gilli then it cooperate the erhart. If something is toothless then it globalize the erhart. If something is acherontic then it globalize the erhart. The madelin is toothless.", "logic": "\nDeterrent(gilli)\nCooperate(erhart, gilli)\nGlobalize(madelin, clari)\nDespicable(clari)\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and Room(x, erhart) -> Globalize(x, gilli))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, gilli) -> Globalize(gilli, madelin))\nforall x (Globalize(x, madelin) -> Toothless(madelin))\nforall x (Room(x, gilli) -> Cooperate(x, erhart))\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Globalize(x, erhart))\nforall x (Acherontic(x) -> Globalize(x, erhart))\n\nToothless(madelin)\n\nCooperate(erhart, gilli) and forall x (Cooperate(x, gilli) -> Globalize(gilli, madelin)) -> therefore Globalize(gilli, madelin) Globalize(gilli, madelin) and forall x (Globalize(x, madelin) -> Toothless(madelin)) -> therefore Toothless(madelin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The mart is corny. The ingamar preside the mart. The justina imbricate the jess. The jess is fusiform. If something is corny and it interrupt the ingamar then it imbricate the mart. If something preside the mart then the mart imbricate the justina. If something imbricate the justina then the justina is fathomable. If something interrupt the mart then it preside the ingamar. If something is fathomable then it imbricate the ingamar. If something is thyrotoxic then it imbricate the ingamar. The justina is not fathomable.", "logic": "\nCorny(mart)\nPreside(ingamar, mart)\nImbricate(justina, jess)\nFusiform(jess)\nforall x (Corny(x) and Interrupt(x, ingamar) -> Imbricate(x, mart))\nforall x (Preside(x, mart) -> Imbricate(mart, justina))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, justina) -> Fathomable(justina))\nforall x (Interrupt(x, mart) -> Preside(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Imbricate(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Thyrotoxic(x) -> Imbricate(x, ingamar))\n\nnot Fathomable(justina)\n\nPreside(ingamar, mart) and forall x (Preside(x, mart) -> Imbricate(mart, justina)) -> therefore Imbricate(mart, justina) Imbricate(mart, justina) and forall x (Imbricate(x, justina) -> Fathomable(justina)) -> therefore Fathomable(justina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The noland is allowable. The ace tear the noland. The ozzie fetishize the clyde. The clyde is herbaceous. If something is allowable and it embrocate the ace then it fetishize the noland. If something tear the noland then the noland fetishize the ozzie. If something fetishize the ozzie then the ozzie is tenebrous. If something embrocate the noland then it tear the ace. If something is tenebrous then it fetishize the ace. If something is blest then it fetishize the ace. The ozzie fetishize the ace.", "logic": "\nAllowable(noland)\nTear(ace, noland)\nFetishize(ozzie, clyde)\nHerbaceous(clyde)\nforall x (Allowable(x) and Embrocate(x, ace) -> Fetishize(x, noland))\nforall x (Tear(x, noland) -> Fetishize(noland, ozzie))\nforall x (Fetishize(x, ozzie) -> Tenebrous(ozzie))\nforall x (Embrocate(x, noland) -> Tear(x, ace))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Fetishize(x, ace))\nforall x (Blest(x) -> Fetishize(x, ace))\n\nFetishize(ozzie, ace)\n\nTear(ace, noland) and forall x (Tear(x, noland) -> Fetishize(noland, ozzie)) -> therefore Fetishize(noland, ozzie) Fetishize(noland, ozzie) and forall x (Fetishize(x, ozzie) -> Tenebrous(ozzie)) -> therefore Tenebrous(ozzie) Tenebrous(ozzie) and forall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Fetishize(x, ace)) -> therefore Fetishize(ozzie, ace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The sherry is uninviting. The sallee refurbish the sherry. The noah peach the niles. The niles is annulate. If something is uninviting and it understand the sallee then it peach the sherry. If something refurbish the sherry then the sherry peach the noah. If something peach the noah then the noah is acephalous. If something understand the sherry then it refurbish the sallee. If something is acephalous then it peach the sallee. If something is striking then it peach the sallee. The noah does not eat the sallee.", "logic": "\nUninviting(sherry)\nRefurbish(sallee, sherry)\nPeach(noah, niles)\nAnnulate(niles)\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Understand(x, sallee) -> Peach(x, sherry))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, sherry) -> Peach(sherry, noah))\nforall x (Peach(x, noah) -> Acephalous(noah))\nforall x (Understand(x, sherry) -> Refurbish(x, sallee))\nforall x (Acephalous(x) -> Peach(x, sallee))\nforall x (Striking(x) -> Peach(x, sallee))\n\nnot Peach(noah, sallee)\n\nRefurbish(sallee, sherry) and forall x (Refurbish(x, sherry) -> Peach(sherry, noah)) -> therefore Peach(sherry, noah) Peach(sherry, noah) and forall x (Peach(x, noah) -> Acephalous(noah)) -> therefore Acephalous(noah) Acephalous(noah) and forall x (Acephalous(x) -> Peach(x, sallee)) -> therefore Peach(noah, sallee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The renado is hebdomadal. The sancho parse the renado. The aubrette conjugate the stafani. The stafani is seafaring. If something is hebdomadal and it caterwaul the sancho then it conjugate the renado. If something parse the renado then the renado conjugate the aubrette. If something conjugate the aubrette then the aubrette is wily. If something caterwaul the renado then it parse the sancho. If something is wily then it conjugate the sancho. If something is infertile then it conjugate the sancho. The aubrette does not eat the renado.", "logic": "\nHebdomadal(renado)\nParse(sancho, renado)\nConjugate(aubrette, stafani)\nSeafaring(stafani)\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Caterwaul(x, sancho) -> Conjugate(x, renado))\nforall x (Parse(x, renado) -> Conjugate(renado, aubrette))\nforall x (Conjugate(x, aubrette) -> Wily(aubrette))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, renado) -> Parse(x, sancho))\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Conjugate(x, sancho))\nforall x (Infertile(x) -> Conjugate(x, sancho))\n\nnot Conjugate(aubrette, renado)\n\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Caterwaul(x, sancho) -> Conjugate(x, renado)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The manda is splayfoot. The bethena file the manda. The marcellus insinuate the alan. The alan is umbrageous. If something is splayfoot and it categorise the bethena then it insinuate the manda. If something file the manda then the manda insinuate the marcellus. If something insinuate the marcellus then the marcellus is diffusing. If something categorise the manda then it file the bethena. If something is diffusing then it insinuate the bethena. If something is operose then it insinuate the bethena. The bethena insinuate the bethena.", "logic": "\nSplayfoot(manda)\nFile(bethena, manda)\nInsinuate(marcellus, alan)\nUmbrageous(alan)\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Categorise(x, bethena) -> Insinuate(x, manda))\nforall x (File(x, manda) -> Insinuate(manda, marcellus))\nforall x (Insinuate(x, marcellus) -> Diffusing(marcellus))\nforall x (Categorise(x, manda) -> File(x, bethena))\nforall x (Diffusing(x) -> Insinuate(x, bethena))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Insinuate(x, bethena))\n\nInsinuate(bethena, bethena)\n\nforall x (Diffusing(x) -> Insinuate(x, bethena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The essa is unquotable. The georgie outvie the essa. The ransom centralise the stu. The stu is divers. If something is unquotable and it deodorise the georgie then it centralise the essa. If something outvie the essa then the essa centralise the ransom. If something centralise the ransom then the ransom is sulcate. If something deodorise the essa then it outvie the georgie. If something is sulcate then it centralise the georgie. If something is despondent then it centralise the georgie. The stu does not eat the georgie.", "logic": "\nUnquotable(essa)\nOutvie(georgie, essa)\nCentralise(ransom, stu)\nDivers(stu)\nforall x (Unquotable(x) and Deodorise(x, georgie) -> Centralise(x, essa))\nforall x (Outvie(x, essa) -> Centralise(essa, ransom))\nforall x (Centralise(x, ransom) -> Sulcate(ransom))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, essa) -> Outvie(x, georgie))\nforall x (Sulcate(x) -> Centralise(x, georgie))\nforall x (Despondent(x) -> Centralise(x, georgie))\n\nnot Centralise(stu, georgie)\n\nforall x (Sulcate(x) -> Centralise(x, georgie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The sharline is crank. The fawnia digitize the sharline. The johanna mismatch the annalise. The annalise is cursory. If something is crank and it deodorize the fawnia then it mismatch the sharline. If something digitize the sharline then the sharline mismatch the johanna. If something mismatch the johanna then the johanna is unhumorous. If something deodorize the sharline then it digitize the fawnia. If something is unhumorous then it mismatch the fawnia. If something is mingy then it mismatch the fawnia. The fawnia mismatch the sharline.", "logic": "\nCrank(sharline)\nDigitize(fawnia, sharline)\nMismatch(johanna, annalise)\nCursory(annalise)\nforall x (Crank(x) and Deodorize(x, fawnia) -> Mismatch(x, sharline))\nforall x (Digitize(x, sharline) -> Mismatch(sharline, johanna))\nforall x (Mismatch(x, johanna) -> Unhumorous(johanna))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, sharline) -> Digitize(x, fawnia))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) -> Mismatch(x, fawnia))\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> Mismatch(x, fawnia))\n\nMismatch(fawnia, sharline)\n\nforall x (Crank(x) and Deodorize(x, fawnia) -> Mismatch(x, sharline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The andrei is elliptic. The ambrosi transport the andrei. The tamiko clothe the danelle. The danelle is excited. If something is elliptic and it fasten the ambrosi then it clothe the andrei. If something transport the andrei then the andrei clothe the tamiko. If something clothe the tamiko then the tamiko is gravid. If something fasten the andrei then it transport the ambrosi. If something is gravid then it clothe the ambrosi. If something is pinched then it clothe the ambrosi. The ambrosi is not pinched.", "logic": "\nElliptic(andrei)\nTransport(ambrosi, andrei)\nClothe(tamiko, danelle)\nExcited(danelle)\nforall x (Elliptic(x) and Fasten(x, ambrosi) -> Clothe(x, andrei))\nforall x (Transport(x, andrei) -> Clothe(andrei, tamiko))\nforall x (Clothe(x, tamiko) -> Gravid(tamiko))\nforall x (Fasten(x, andrei) -> Transport(x, ambrosi))\nforall x (Gravid(x) -> Clothe(x, ambrosi))\nforall x (Pinched(x) -> Clothe(x, ambrosi))\n\nnot Pinched(ambrosi)\n\nnot Pinched(ambrosi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The gloria is theoretic. The carlena paralyze the gloria. The jervis economise the annamaria. The annamaria is boughed. If something is theoretic and it eruct the carlena then it economise the gloria. If something paralyze the gloria then the gloria economise the jervis. If something economise the jervis then the jervis is tubed. If something eruct the gloria then it paralyze the carlena. If something is tubed then it economise the carlena. If something is debonair then it economise the carlena. The jervis is green.", "logic": "\nTheoretic(gloria)\nParalyze(carlena, gloria)\nEconomise(jervis, annamaria)\nBoughed(annamaria)\nforall x (Theoretic(x) and Eruct(x, carlena) -> Economise(x, gloria))\nforall x (Paralyze(x, gloria) -> Economise(gloria, jervis))\nforall x (Economise(x, jervis) -> Tubed(jervis))\nforall x (Eruct(x, gloria) -> Paralyze(x, carlena))\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Economise(x, carlena))\nforall x (Debonair(x) -> Economise(x, carlena))\n\nGreen(jervis)\n\nGreen(jervis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The cyrillus is tall. The krystyna bale the cyrillus. The charmaine handcraft the tymothy. The tymothy is sloped. If something is tall and it carouse the krystyna then it handcraft the cyrillus. If something bale the cyrillus then the cyrillus handcraft the charmaine. If something handcraft the charmaine then the charmaine is immaterial. If something carouse the cyrillus then it bale the krystyna. If something is immaterial then it handcraft the krystyna. If something is capsulated then it handcraft the krystyna. The tymothy is not green.", "logic": "\nTall(cyrillus)\nBale(krystyna, cyrillus)\nHandcraft(charmaine, tymothy)\nSloped(tymothy)\nforall x (Tall(x) and Carouse(x, krystyna) -> Handcraft(x, cyrillus))\nforall x (Bale(x, cyrillus) -> Handcraft(cyrillus, charmaine))\nforall x (Handcraft(x, charmaine) -> Immaterial(charmaine))\nforall x (Carouse(x, cyrillus) -> Bale(x, krystyna))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Handcraft(x, krystyna))\nforall x (Capsulated(x) -> Handcraft(x, krystyna))\n\nnot Green(tymothy)\n\nnot Green(tymothy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The tawsha is gnomic. The morley espouse the tawsha. The blinnie plot the nomi. The nomi is recoilless. If something is gnomic and it recommit the morley then it plot the tawsha. If something espouse the tawsha then the tawsha plot the blinnie. If something plot the blinnie then the blinnie is diminutive. If something recommit the tawsha then it espouse the morley. If something is diminutive then it plot the morley. If something is ecologic then it plot the morley. The morley is gnomic.", "logic": "\nGnomic(tawsha)\nEspouse(morley, tawsha)\nPlot(blinnie, nomi)\nRecoilless(nomi)\nforall x (Gnomic(x) and Recommit(x, morley) -> Plot(x, tawsha))\nforall x (Espouse(x, tawsha) -> Plot(tawsha, blinnie))\nforall x (Plot(x, blinnie) -> Diminutive(blinnie))\nforall x (Recommit(x, tawsha) -> Espouse(x, morley))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Plot(x, morley))\nforall x (Ecologic(x) -> Plot(x, morley))\n\nGnomic(morley)\n\nGnomic(morley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The kristine grizzle the kynthia. The kristine is batwing. The kristine is squirting. The kristine is delirious. The kristine is enveloping. The kristine evict the kynthia. The kristine curvet the kynthia. The kynthia grizzle the kristine. The kynthia is batwing. The kynthia is squirting. The kynthia is enveloping. The kynthia curvet the kristine. If someone curvet the kristine and they eat the kristine then the kristine is ownerless. If someone grizzle the kynthia and the kynthia is enveloping then the kynthia curvet the kristine. If the kristine is ownerless and the kristine is enveloping then the kristine curvet the kynthia. If someone is ownerless then they eat the kynthia. If someone curvet the kynthia and the kynthia is delirious then they like the kynthia. If someone grizzle the kynthia and the kynthia is batwing then they eat the kristine. If someone is ownerless then they are batwing. If someone is ownerless and they like the kynthia then the kynthia is ownerless. The kristine is batwing.", "logic": "\nGrizzle(kristine, kynthia)\nBatwing(kristine)\nSquirting(kristine)\nDelirious(kristine)\nEnveloping(kristine)\nEvict(kristine, kynthia)\nCurvet(kristine, kynthia)\nGrizzle(kynthia, kristine)\nBatwing(kynthia)\nSquirting(kynthia)\nEnveloping(kynthia)\nCurvet(kynthia, kristine)\nforall x (Curvet(x, kristine) and Grizzle(x, kristine) -> Ownerless(kristine))\nforall x (Grizzle(x, kynthia) and Enveloping(kynthia) -> Curvet(kynthia, kristine))\nOwnerless(kristine) and Enveloping(kristine) -> Curvet(kristine, kynthia)\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Grizzle(x, kynthia))\nforall x (Curvet(x, kynthia) and Delirious(kynthia) -> Evict(x, kynthia))\nforall x (Grizzle(x, kynthia) and Batwing(kynthia) -> Grizzle(x, kristine))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Batwing(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) and Evict(x, kynthia) -> Ownerless(kynthia))\n\nBatwing(kristine)\n\ntherefore Batwing(kristine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The vallie belabour the bogdan. The vallie is sedentary. The vallie is intense. The vallie is simple. The vallie is getatable. The vallie elegise the bogdan. The vallie list the bogdan. The bogdan belabour the vallie. The bogdan is sedentary. The bogdan is intense. The bogdan is getatable. The bogdan list the vallie. If someone list the vallie and they eat the vallie then the vallie is stringent. If someone belabour the bogdan and the bogdan is getatable then the bogdan list the vallie. If the vallie is stringent and the vallie is getatable then the vallie list the bogdan. If someone is stringent then they eat the bogdan. If someone list the bogdan and the bogdan is simple then they like the bogdan. If someone belabour the bogdan and the bogdan is sedentary then they eat the vallie. If someone is stringent then they are sedentary. If someone is stringent and they like the bogdan then the bogdan is stringent. The vallie does not like the bogdan.", "logic": "\nBelabour(vallie, bogdan)\nSedentary(vallie)\nIntense(vallie)\nSimple(vallie)\nGetatable(vallie)\nElegise(vallie, bogdan)\nList(vallie, bogdan)\nBelabour(bogdan, vallie)\nSedentary(bogdan)\nIntense(bogdan)\nGetatable(bogdan)\nList(bogdan, vallie)\nforall x (List(x, vallie) and Belabour(x, vallie) -> Stringent(vallie))\nforall x (Belabour(x, bogdan) and Getatable(bogdan) -> List(bogdan, vallie))\nStringent(vallie) and Getatable(vallie) -> List(vallie, bogdan)\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Belabour(x, bogdan))\nforall x (List(x, bogdan) and Simple(bogdan) -> Elegise(x, bogdan))\nforall x (Belabour(x, bogdan) and Sedentary(bogdan) -> Belabour(x, vallie))\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Stringent(x) and Elegise(x, bogdan) -> Stringent(bogdan))\n\nnot Elegise(vallie, bogdan)\n\ntherefore Elegise(vallie, bogdan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The jan bivouac the inessa. The jan is lobate. The jan is abstemious. The jan is credal. The jan is diverting. The jan reforest the inessa. The jan delineate the inessa. The inessa bivouac the jan. The inessa is lobate. The inessa is abstemious. The inessa is diverting. The inessa delineate the jan. If someone delineate the jan and they eat the jan then the jan is leeward. If someone bivouac the inessa and the inessa is diverting then the inessa delineate the jan. If the jan is leeward and the jan is diverting then the jan delineate the inessa. If someone is leeward then they eat the inessa. If someone delineate the inessa and the inessa is credal then they like the inessa. If someone bivouac the inessa and the inessa is lobate then they eat the jan. If someone is leeward then they are lobate. If someone is leeward and they like the inessa then the inessa is leeward. The jan bivouac the jan.", "logic": "\nBivouac(jan, inessa)\nLobate(jan)\nAbstemious(jan)\nCredal(jan)\nDiverting(jan)\nReforest(jan, inessa)\nDelineate(jan, inessa)\nBivouac(inessa, jan)\nLobate(inessa)\nAbstemious(inessa)\nDiverting(inessa)\nDelineate(inessa, jan)\nforall x (Delineate(x, jan) and Bivouac(x, jan) -> Leeward(jan))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, inessa) and Diverting(inessa) -> Delineate(inessa, jan))\nLeeward(jan) and Diverting(jan) -> Delineate(jan, inessa)\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Bivouac(x, inessa))\nforall x (Delineate(x, inessa) and Credal(inessa) -> Reforest(x, inessa))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, inessa) and Lobate(inessa) -> Bivouac(x, jan))\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Lobate(x))\nforall x (Leeward(x) and Reforest(x, inessa) -> Leeward(inessa))\n\nBivouac(jan, jan)\n\nBivouac(jan, inessa) and Lobate(inessa) and forall x (Bivouac(x, inessa) and Lobate(inessa) -> Bivouac(x, jan)) -> therefore Bivouac(jan, jan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The curtice explode the salem. The curtice is imprudent. The curtice is granitic. The curtice is unredeemed. The curtice is rewarding. The curtice forsake the salem. The curtice quiver the salem. The salem explode the curtice. The salem is imprudent. The salem is granitic. The salem is rewarding. The salem quiver the curtice. If someone quiver the curtice and they eat the curtice then the curtice is pubescent. If someone explode the salem and the salem is rewarding then the salem quiver the curtice. If the curtice is pubescent and the curtice is rewarding then the curtice quiver the salem. If someone is pubescent then they eat the salem. If someone quiver the salem and the salem is unredeemed then they like the salem. If someone explode the salem and the salem is imprudent then they eat the curtice. If someone is pubescent then they are imprudent. If someone is pubescent and they like the salem then the salem is pubescent. The curtice is not pubescent.", "logic": "\nExplode(curtice, salem)\nImprudent(curtice)\nGranitic(curtice)\nUnredeemed(curtice)\nRewarding(curtice)\nForsake(curtice, salem)\nQuiver(curtice, salem)\nExplode(salem, curtice)\nImprudent(salem)\nGranitic(salem)\nRewarding(salem)\nQuiver(salem, curtice)\nforall x (Quiver(x, curtice) and Explode(x, curtice) -> Pubescent(curtice))\nforall x (Explode(x, salem) and Rewarding(salem) -> Quiver(salem, curtice))\nPubescent(curtice) and Rewarding(curtice) -> Quiver(curtice, salem)\nforall x (Pubescent(x) -> Explode(x, salem))\nforall x (Quiver(x, salem) and Unredeemed(salem) -> Forsake(x, salem))\nforall x (Explode(x, salem) and Imprudent(salem) -> Explode(x, curtice))\nforall x (Pubescent(x) -> Imprudent(x))\nforall x (Pubescent(x) and Forsake(x, salem) -> Pubescent(salem))\n\nnot Pubescent(curtice)\n\nQuiver(salem, curtice) and Explode(salem, curtice) and forall x (Quiver(x, curtice) and Explode(x, curtice) -> Pubescent(curtice)) -> therefore Pubescent(curtice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The clarisa digest the lynnet. The clarisa is eurasian. The clarisa is flawless. The clarisa is adhesive. The clarisa is striate. The clarisa fall the lynnet. The clarisa fellate the lynnet. The lynnet digest the clarisa. The lynnet is eurasian. The lynnet is flawless. The lynnet is striate. The lynnet fellate the clarisa. If someone fellate the clarisa and they eat the clarisa then the clarisa is lucent. If someone digest the lynnet and the lynnet is striate then the lynnet fellate the clarisa. If the clarisa is lucent and the clarisa is striate then the clarisa fellate the lynnet. If someone is lucent then they eat the lynnet. If someone fellate the lynnet and the lynnet is adhesive then they like the lynnet. If someone digest the lynnet and the lynnet is eurasian then they eat the clarisa. If someone is lucent then they are eurasian. If someone is lucent and they like the lynnet then the lynnet is lucent. The lynnet is lucent.", "logic": "\nDigest(clarisa, lynnet)\nEurasian(clarisa)\nFlawless(clarisa)\nAdhesive(clarisa)\nStriate(clarisa)\nFall(clarisa, lynnet)\nFellate(clarisa, lynnet)\nDigest(lynnet, clarisa)\nEurasian(lynnet)\nFlawless(lynnet)\nStriate(lynnet)\nFellate(lynnet, clarisa)\nforall x (Fellate(x, clarisa) and Digest(x, clarisa) -> Lucent(clarisa))\nforall x (Digest(x, lynnet) and Striate(lynnet) -> Fellate(lynnet, clarisa))\nLucent(clarisa) and Striate(clarisa) -> Fellate(clarisa, lynnet)\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Digest(x, lynnet))\nforall x (Fellate(x, lynnet) and Adhesive(lynnet) -> Fall(x, lynnet))\nforall x (Digest(x, lynnet) and Eurasian(lynnet) -> Digest(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Eurasian(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) and Fall(x, lynnet) -> Lucent(lynnet))\n\nLucent(lynnet)\n\nFellate(lynnet, clarisa) and Digest(lynnet, clarisa) and forall x (Fellate(x, clarisa) and Digest(x, clarisa) -> Lucent(clarisa)) -> therefore Lucent(clarisa) Lucent(clarisa) and Fall(clarisa, lynnet) and forall x (Lucent(x) and Fall(x, lynnet) -> Lucent(lynnet)) -> therefore Lucent(lynnet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The edith repose the willey. The edith is incurious. The edith is dashed. The edith is idle. The edith is drooping. The edith rout the willey. The edith whet the willey. The willey repose the edith. The willey is incurious. The willey is dashed. The willey is drooping. The willey whet the edith. If someone whet the edith and they eat the edith then the edith is chummy. If someone repose the willey and the willey is drooping then the willey whet the edith. If the edith is chummy and the edith is drooping then the edith whet the willey. If someone is chummy then they eat the willey. If someone whet the willey and the willey is idle then they like the willey. If someone repose the willey and the willey is incurious then they eat the edith. If someone is chummy then they are incurious. If someone is chummy and they like the willey then the willey is chummy. The willey is not chummy.", "logic": "\nRepose(edith, willey)\nIncurious(edith)\nDashed(edith)\nIdle(edith)\nDrooping(edith)\nRout(edith, willey)\nWhet(edith, willey)\nRepose(willey, edith)\nIncurious(willey)\nDashed(willey)\nDrooping(willey)\nWhet(willey, edith)\nforall x (Whet(x, edith) and Repose(x, edith) -> Chummy(edith))\nforall x (Repose(x, willey) and Drooping(willey) -> Whet(willey, edith))\nChummy(edith) and Drooping(edith) -> Whet(edith, willey)\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Repose(x, willey))\nforall x (Whet(x, willey) and Idle(willey) -> Rout(x, willey))\nforall x (Repose(x, willey) and Incurious(willey) -> Repose(x, edith))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Incurious(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and Rout(x, willey) -> Chummy(willey))\n\nnot Chummy(willey)\n\nWhet(willey, edith) and Repose(willey, edith) and forall x (Whet(x, edith) and Repose(x, edith) -> Chummy(edith)) -> therefore Chummy(edith) Chummy(edith) and Rout(edith, willey) and forall x (Chummy(x) and Rout(x, willey) -> Chummy(willey)) -> therefore Chummy(willey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The tirrell sabre the rayna. The tirrell is cuneiform. The tirrell is vulgar. The tirrell is atrocious. The tirrell is subhuman. The tirrell costume the rayna. The tirrell forget the rayna. The rayna sabre the tirrell. The rayna is cuneiform. The rayna is vulgar. The rayna is subhuman. The rayna forget the tirrell. If someone forget the tirrell and they eat the tirrell then the tirrell is unleaded. If someone sabre the rayna and the rayna is subhuman then the rayna forget the tirrell. If the tirrell is unleaded and the tirrell is subhuman then the tirrell forget the rayna. If someone is unleaded then they eat the rayna. If someone forget the rayna and the rayna is atrocious then they like the rayna. If someone sabre the rayna and the rayna is cuneiform then they eat the tirrell. If someone is unleaded then they are cuneiform. If someone is unleaded and they like the rayna then the rayna is unleaded. The rayna sabre the rayna.", "logic": "\nSabre(tirrell, rayna)\nCuneiform(tirrell)\nVulgar(tirrell)\nAtrocious(tirrell)\nSubhuman(tirrell)\nCostume(tirrell, rayna)\nForget(tirrell, rayna)\nSabre(rayna, tirrell)\nCuneiform(rayna)\nVulgar(rayna)\nSubhuman(rayna)\nForget(rayna, tirrell)\nforall x (Forget(x, tirrell) and Sabre(x, tirrell) -> Unleaded(tirrell))\nforall x (Sabre(x, rayna) and Subhuman(rayna) -> Forget(rayna, tirrell))\nUnleaded(tirrell) and Subhuman(tirrell) -> Forget(tirrell, rayna)\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Sabre(x, rayna))\nforall x (Forget(x, rayna) and Atrocious(rayna) -> Costume(x, rayna))\nforall x (Sabre(x, rayna) and Cuneiform(rayna) -> Sabre(x, tirrell))\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Unleaded(x) and Costume(x, rayna) -> Unleaded(rayna))\n\nSabre(rayna, rayna)\n\nForget(rayna, tirrell) and Sabre(rayna, tirrell) and forall x (Forget(x, tirrell) and Sabre(x, tirrell) -> Unleaded(tirrell)) -> therefore Unleaded(tirrell) Unleaded(tirrell) and Costume(tirrell, rayna) and forall x (Unleaded(x) and Costume(x, rayna) -> Unleaded(rayna)) -> therefore Unleaded(rayna) Unleaded(rayna) and forall x (Unleaded(x) -> Sabre(x, rayna)) -> therefore Sabre(rayna, rayna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The janifer unveil the claribel. The janifer is bilgy. The janifer is prudential. The janifer is degraded. The janifer is lowland. The janifer titillate the claribel. The janifer succor the claribel. The claribel unveil the janifer. The claribel is bilgy. The claribel is prudential. The claribel is lowland. The claribel succor the janifer. If someone succor the janifer and they eat the janifer then the janifer is coiled. If someone unveil the claribel and the claribel is lowland then the claribel succor the janifer. If the janifer is coiled and the janifer is lowland then the janifer succor the claribel. If someone is coiled then they eat the claribel. If someone succor the claribel and the claribel is degraded then they like the claribel. If someone unveil the claribel and the claribel is bilgy then they eat the janifer. If someone is coiled then they are bilgy. If someone is coiled and they like the claribel then the claribel is coiled. The claribel does not eat the claribel.", "logic": "\nUnveil(janifer, claribel)\nBilgy(janifer)\nPrudential(janifer)\nDegraded(janifer)\nLowland(janifer)\nTitillate(janifer, claribel)\nSuccor(janifer, claribel)\nUnveil(claribel, janifer)\nBilgy(claribel)\nPrudential(claribel)\nLowland(claribel)\nSuccor(claribel, janifer)\nforall x (Succor(x, janifer) and Unveil(x, janifer) -> Coiled(janifer))\nforall x (Unveil(x, claribel) and Lowland(claribel) -> Succor(claribel, janifer))\nCoiled(janifer) and Lowland(janifer) -> Succor(janifer, claribel)\nforall x (Coiled(x) -> Unveil(x, claribel))\nforall x (Succor(x, claribel) and Degraded(claribel) -> Titillate(x, claribel))\nforall x (Unveil(x, claribel) and Bilgy(claribel) -> Unveil(x, janifer))\nforall x (Coiled(x) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) and Titillate(x, claribel) -> Coiled(claribel))\n\nnot Unveil(claribel, claribel)\n\nSuccor(claribel, janifer) and Unveil(claribel, janifer) and forall x (Succor(x, janifer) and Unveil(x, janifer) -> Coiled(janifer)) -> therefore Coiled(janifer) Coiled(janifer) and Titillate(janifer, claribel) and forall x (Coiled(x) and Titillate(x, claribel) -> Coiled(claribel)) -> therefore Coiled(claribel) Coiled(claribel) and forall x (Coiled(x) -> Unveil(x, claribel)) -> therefore Unveil(claribel, claribel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The olympe bang the ashlen. The olympe is directing. The olympe is chivalrous. The olympe is zoic. The olympe is chthonian. The olympe interleave the ashlen. The olympe fizz the ashlen. The ashlen bang the olympe. The ashlen is directing. The ashlen is chivalrous. The ashlen is chthonian. The ashlen fizz the olympe. If someone fizz the olympe and they eat the olympe then the olympe is well. If someone bang the ashlen and the ashlen is chthonian then the ashlen fizz the olympe. If the olympe is well and the olympe is chthonian then the olympe fizz the ashlen. If someone is well then they eat the ashlen. If someone fizz the ashlen and the ashlen is zoic then they like the ashlen. If someone bang the ashlen and the ashlen is directing then they eat the olympe. If someone is well then they are directing. If someone is well and they like the ashlen then the ashlen is well. The ashlen does not like the ashlen.", "logic": "\nBang(olympe, ashlen)\nDirecting(olympe)\nChivalrous(olympe)\nZoic(olympe)\nChthonian(olympe)\nInterleave(olympe, ashlen)\nFizz(olympe, ashlen)\nBang(ashlen, olympe)\nDirecting(ashlen)\nChivalrous(ashlen)\nChthonian(ashlen)\nFizz(ashlen, olympe)\nforall x (Fizz(x, olympe) and Bang(x, olympe) -> Well(olympe))\nforall x (Bang(x, ashlen) and Chthonian(ashlen) -> Fizz(ashlen, olympe))\nWell(olympe) and Chthonian(olympe) -> Fizz(olympe, ashlen)\nforall x (Well(x) -> Bang(x, ashlen))\nforall x (Fizz(x, ashlen) and Zoic(ashlen) -> Interleave(x, ashlen))\nforall x (Bang(x, ashlen) and Directing(ashlen) -> Bang(x, olympe))\nforall x (Well(x) -> Directing(x))\nforall x (Well(x) and Interleave(x, ashlen) -> Well(ashlen))\n\nnot Interleave(ashlen, ashlen)\n\nforall x (Fizz(x, ashlen) and Zoic(ashlen) -> Interleave(x, ashlen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The merrick empale the aubree. The merrick is unbeatable. The merrick is sabbatical. The merrick is loth. The merrick is unmelodic. The merrick copyright the aubree. The merrick unroll the aubree. The aubree empale the merrick. The aubree is unbeatable. The aubree is sabbatical. The aubree is unmelodic. The aubree unroll the merrick. If someone unroll the merrick and they eat the merrick then the merrick is amusive. If someone empale the aubree and the aubree is unmelodic then the aubree unroll the merrick. If the merrick is amusive and the merrick is unmelodic then the merrick unroll the aubree. If someone is amusive then they eat the aubree. If someone unroll the aubree and the aubree is loth then they like the aubree. If someone empale the aubree and the aubree is unbeatable then they eat the merrick. If someone is amusive then they are unbeatable. If someone is amusive and they like the aubree then the aubree is amusive. The aubree copyright the merrick.", "logic": "\nEmpale(merrick, aubree)\nUnbeatable(merrick)\nSabbatical(merrick)\nLoth(merrick)\nUnmelodic(merrick)\nCopyright(merrick, aubree)\nUnroll(merrick, aubree)\nEmpale(aubree, merrick)\nUnbeatable(aubree)\nSabbatical(aubree)\nUnmelodic(aubree)\nUnroll(aubree, merrick)\nforall x (Unroll(x, merrick) and Empale(x, merrick) -> Amusive(merrick))\nforall x (Empale(x, aubree) and Unmelodic(aubree) -> Unroll(aubree, merrick))\nAmusive(merrick) and Unmelodic(merrick) -> Unroll(merrick, aubree)\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Empale(x, aubree))\nforall x (Unroll(x, aubree) and Loth(aubree) -> Copyright(x, aubree))\nforall x (Empale(x, aubree) and Unbeatable(aubree) -> Empale(x, merrick))\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Unbeatable(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) and Copyright(x, aubree) -> Amusive(aubree))\n\nCopyright(aubree, merrick)\n\nCopyright(aubree, merrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The sharla divine the rachael. The sharla is fueled. The sharla is attenuate. The sharla is probing. The sharla is biradial. The sharla embattle the rachael. The sharla deputise the rachael. The rachael divine the sharla. The rachael is fueled. The rachael is attenuate. The rachael is biradial. The rachael deputise the sharla. If someone deputise the sharla and they eat the sharla then the sharla is unveiled. If someone divine the rachael and the rachael is biradial then the rachael deputise the sharla. If the sharla is unveiled and the sharla is biradial then the sharla deputise the rachael. If someone is unveiled then they eat the rachael. If someone deputise the rachael and the rachael is probing then they like the rachael. If someone divine the rachael and the rachael is fueled then they eat the sharla. If someone is unveiled then they are fueled. If someone is unveiled and they like the rachael then the rachael is unveiled. The sharla does not like the sharla.", "logic": "\nDivine(sharla, rachael)\nFueled(sharla)\nAttenuate(sharla)\nProbing(sharla)\nBiradial(sharla)\nEmbattle(sharla, rachael)\nDeputise(sharla, rachael)\nDivine(rachael, sharla)\nFueled(rachael)\nAttenuate(rachael)\nBiradial(rachael)\nDeputise(rachael, sharla)\nforall x (Deputise(x, sharla) and Divine(x, sharla) -> Unveiled(sharla))\nforall x (Divine(x, rachael) and Biradial(rachael) -> Deputise(rachael, sharla))\nUnveiled(sharla) and Biradial(sharla) -> Deputise(sharla, rachael)\nforall x (Unveiled(x) -> Divine(x, rachael))\nforall x (Deputise(x, rachael) and Probing(rachael) -> Embattle(x, rachael))\nforall x (Divine(x, rachael) and Fueled(rachael) -> Divine(x, sharla))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) -> Fueled(x))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) and Embattle(x, rachael) -> Unveiled(rachael))\n\nnot Embattle(sharla, sharla)\n\nnot Embattle(sharla, sharla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The kristin solemnize the pammie. The kristin is clownish. The kristin is extended. The kristin is healthy. The kristin is pyogenic. The kristin demote the pammie. The kristin mope the pammie. The pammie solemnize the kristin. The pammie is clownish. The pammie is extended. The pammie is pyogenic. The pammie mope the kristin. If someone mope the kristin and they eat the kristin then the kristin is tight. If someone solemnize the pammie and the pammie is pyogenic then the pammie mope the kristin. If the kristin is tight and the kristin is pyogenic then the kristin mope the pammie. If someone is tight then they eat the pammie. If someone mope the pammie and the pammie is healthy then they like the pammie. If someone solemnize the pammie and the pammie is clownish then they eat the kristin. If someone is tight then they are clownish. If someone is tight and they like the pammie then the pammie is tight. The kristin mope the kristin.", "logic": "\nSolemnize(kristin, pammie)\nClownish(kristin)\nExtended(kristin)\nHealthy(kristin)\nPyogenic(kristin)\nDemote(kristin, pammie)\nMope(kristin, pammie)\nSolemnize(pammie, kristin)\nClownish(pammie)\nExtended(pammie)\nPyogenic(pammie)\nMope(pammie, kristin)\nforall x (Mope(x, kristin) and Solemnize(x, kristin) -> Tight(kristin))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, pammie) and Pyogenic(pammie) -> Mope(pammie, kristin))\nTight(kristin) and Pyogenic(kristin) -> Mope(kristin, pammie)\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Solemnize(x, pammie))\nforall x (Mope(x, pammie) and Healthy(pammie) -> Demote(x, pammie))\nforall x (Solemnize(x, pammie) and Clownish(pammie) -> Solemnize(x, kristin))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Clownish(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and Demote(x, pammie) -> Tight(pammie))\n\nMope(kristin, kristin)\n\nMope(kristin, kristin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The dulce gawk the margy. The dulce is clonic. The dulce is pressor. The dulce is regenerate. The dulce is penile. The dulce suppose the margy. The dulce receipt the margy. The margy gawk the dulce. The margy is clonic. The margy is pressor. The margy is penile. The margy receipt the dulce. If someone receipt the dulce and they eat the dulce then the dulce is decent. If someone gawk the margy and the margy is penile then the margy receipt the dulce. If the dulce is decent and the dulce is penile then the dulce receipt the margy. If someone is decent then they eat the margy. If someone receipt the margy and the margy is regenerate then they like the margy. If someone gawk the margy and the margy is clonic then they eat the dulce. If someone is decent then they are clonic. If someone is decent and they like the margy then the margy is decent. The margy does not visit the margy.", "logic": "\nGawk(dulce, margy)\nClonic(dulce)\nPressor(dulce)\nRegenerate(dulce)\nPenile(dulce)\nSuppose(dulce, margy)\nReceipt(dulce, margy)\nGawk(margy, dulce)\nClonic(margy)\nPressor(margy)\nPenile(margy)\nReceipt(margy, dulce)\nforall x (Receipt(x, dulce) and Gawk(x, dulce) -> Decent(dulce))\nforall x (Gawk(x, margy) and Penile(margy) -> Receipt(margy, dulce))\nDecent(dulce) and Penile(dulce) -> Receipt(dulce, margy)\nforall x (Decent(x) -> Gawk(x, margy))\nforall x (Receipt(x, margy) and Regenerate(margy) -> Suppose(x, margy))\nforall x (Gawk(x, margy) and Clonic(margy) -> Gawk(x, dulce))\nforall x (Decent(x) -> Clonic(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) and Suppose(x, margy) -> Decent(margy))\n\nnot Receipt(margy, margy)\n\nnot Receipt(margy, margy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The miquela detonate the darda. The miquela is glorious. The miquela is commutable. The miquela is monotone. The miquela is unmarried. The miquela dope the darda. The miquela slight the darda. The darda detonate the miquela. The darda is glorious. The darda is commutable. The darda is unmarried. The darda slight the miquela. If someone slight the miquela and they eat the miquela then the miquela is sandpapery. If someone detonate the darda and the darda is unmarried then the darda slight the miquela. If the miquela is sandpapery and the miquela is unmarried then the miquela slight the darda. If someone is sandpapery then they eat the darda. If someone slight the darda and the darda is monotone then they like the darda. If someone detonate the darda and the darda is glorious then they eat the miquela. If someone is sandpapery then they are glorious. If someone is sandpapery and they like the darda then the darda is sandpapery. The darda is monotone.", "logic": "\nDetonate(miquela, darda)\nGlorious(miquela)\nCommutable(miquela)\nMonotone(miquela)\nUnmarried(miquela)\nDope(miquela, darda)\nSlight(miquela, darda)\nDetonate(darda, miquela)\nGlorious(darda)\nCommutable(darda)\nUnmarried(darda)\nSlight(darda, miquela)\nforall x (Slight(x, miquela) and Detonate(x, miquela) -> Sandpapery(miquela))\nforall x (Detonate(x, darda) and Unmarried(darda) -> Slight(darda, miquela))\nSandpapery(miquela) and Unmarried(miquela) -> Slight(miquela, darda)\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Detonate(x, darda))\nforall x (Slight(x, darda) and Monotone(darda) -> Dope(x, darda))\nforall x (Detonate(x, darda) and Glorious(darda) -> Detonate(x, miquela))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Dope(x, darda) -> Sandpapery(darda))\n\nMonotone(darda)\n\nMonotone(darda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "Misti is galvanic. Catherine is obnoxious. Torr is whacky. Casey is documental. If someone is kenyan and obnoxious then they are diminutive. Rough, galvanic people are lightproof. All lightproof people are kenyan. All galvanic people are lightproof. If someone is obnoxious then they are lightproof. All lightproof people are kenyan. Misti is galvanic.", "logic": "\nGalvanic(misti)\nObnoxious(catherine)\nWhacky(torr)\nDocumental(casey)\nforall x (Kenyan(x) and Obnoxious(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Kenyan(x) and Galvanic(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Kenyan(x))\n\nGalvanic(misti)\n\ntherefore Galvanic(misti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Sander is pedigreed. Loralee is yellowish. Luciana is assorted. Emelita is disgustful. If someone is bulgarian and yellowish then they are unanswered. Rough, pedigreed people are cornered. All cornered people are bulgarian. All pedigreed people are cornered. If someone is yellowish then they are cornered. All cornered people are bulgarian. Emelita is not disgustful.", "logic": "\nPedigreed(sander)\nYellowish(loralee)\nAssorted(luciana)\nDisgustful(emelita)\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) and Yellowish(x) -> Unanswered(x))\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> Cornered(x))\nforall x (Cornered(x) -> Bulgarian(x))\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Cornered(x))\nforall x (Yellowish(x) -> Cornered(x))\nforall x (Cornered(x) -> Bulgarian(x))\n\nnot Disgustful(emelita)\n\ntherefore Disgustful(emelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Bryce is extendible. Dickie is eastmost. Reiko is valid. Barnabas is sabbatic. If someone is vincible and eastmost then they are millennial. Rough, extendible people are liked. All liked people are vincible. All extendible people are liked. If someone is eastmost then they are liked. All liked people are vincible. Bryce is liked.", "logic": "\nExtendible(bryce)\nEastmost(dickie)\nValid(reiko)\nSabbatic(barnabas)\nforall x (Vincible(x) and Eastmost(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Vincible(x) and Extendible(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Liked(x) -> Vincible(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Liked(x) -> Vincible(x))\n\nLiked(bryce)\n\nExtendible(bryce) and forall x (Extendible(x) -> Liked(x)) -> therefore Liked(bryce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Spence is awestruck. Leonidas is incestuous. Torr is venetian. Christan is oblong. If someone is runny and incestuous then they are persian. Rough, awestruck people are bias. All bias people are runny. All awestruck people are bias. If someone is incestuous then they are bias. All bias people are runny. Spence is not bias.", "logic": "\nAwestruck(spence)\nIncestuous(leonidas)\nVenetian(torr)\nOblong(christan)\nforall x (Runny(x) and Incestuous(x) -> Persian(x))\nforall x (Runny(x) and Awestruck(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Bias(x) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Awestruck(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Incestuous(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Bias(x) -> Runny(x))\n\nnot Bias(spence)\n\nAwestruck(spence) and forall x (Awestruck(x) -> Bias(x)) -> therefore Bias(spence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Dove is allophonic. Worden is pure. Sue is lxxiv. Marco is lithuanian. If someone is piercing and pure then they are prussian. Rough, allophonic people are edgy. All edgy people are piercing. All allophonic people are edgy. If someone is pure then they are edgy. All edgy people are piercing. Worden is piercing.", "logic": "\nAllophonic(dove)\nPure(worden)\nLxxiv(sue)\nLithuanian(marco)\nforall x (Piercing(x) and Pure(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Piercing(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Edgy(x))\nforall x (Edgy(x) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) -> Edgy(x))\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Edgy(x))\nforall x (Edgy(x) -> Piercing(x))\n\nPiercing(worden)\n\nPure(worden) and forall x (Pure(x) -> Edgy(x)) -> therefore Edgy(worden) Edgy(worden) and forall x (Edgy(x) -> Piercing(x)) -> therefore Piercing(worden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Nicoline is prototypal. Liza is ultrasonic. Josiah is mantic. Maribel is alated. If someone is diabatic and ultrasonic then they are offside. Rough, prototypal people are noduled. All noduled people are diabatic. All prototypal people are noduled. If someone is ultrasonic then they are noduled. All noduled people are diabatic. Nicoline is not diabatic.", "logic": "\nPrototypal(nicoline)\nUltrasonic(liza)\nMantic(josiah)\nAlated(maribel)\nforall x (Diabatic(x) and Ultrasonic(x) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Diabatic(x) and Prototypal(x) -> Noduled(x))\nforall x (Noduled(x) -> Diabatic(x))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) -> Noduled(x))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) -> Noduled(x))\nforall x (Noduled(x) -> Diabatic(x))\n\nnot Diabatic(nicoline)\n\nPrototypal(nicoline) and forall x (Prototypal(x) -> Noduled(x)) -> therefore Noduled(nicoline) Noduled(nicoline) and forall x (Noduled(x) -> Diabatic(x)) -> therefore Diabatic(nicoline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Andie is illiterate. Giacomo is briton. Lolly is neurogenic. Son is nonthermal. If someone is toothless and briton then they are chaldaean. Rough, illiterate people are betting. All betting people are toothless. All illiterate people are betting. If someone is briton then they are betting. All betting people are toothless. Giacomo is chaldaean.", "logic": "\nIlliterate(andie)\nBriton(giacomo)\nNeurogenic(lolly)\nNonthermal(son)\nforall x (Toothless(x) and Briton(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) and Illiterate(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) -> Toothless(x))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Briton(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) -> Toothless(x))\n\nChaldaean(giacomo)\n\nBriton(giacomo) and forall x (Briton(x) -> Betting(x)) -> therefore Betting(giacomo) Betting(giacomo) and forall x (Betting(x) -> Toothless(x)) -> therefore Toothless(giacomo) Toothless(giacomo) and Briton(giacomo) and forall x (Toothless(x) and Briton(x) -> Chaldaean(x)) -> therefore Chaldaean(giacomo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Barbabas is foaming. Moses is tasty. Fayth is ungathered. Allah is hemostatic. If someone is florentine and tasty then they are mousy. Rough, foaming people are through. All through people are florentine. All foaming people are through. If someone is tasty then they are through. All through people are florentine. Moses is not mousy.", "logic": "\nFoaming(barbabas)\nTasty(moses)\nUngathered(fayth)\nHemostatic(allah)\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Tasty(x) -> Mousy(x))\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Foaming(x) -> Through(x))\nforall x (Through(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Through(x))\nforall x (Tasty(x) -> Through(x))\nforall x (Through(x) -> Florentine(x))\n\nnot Mousy(moses)\n\nTasty(moses) and forall x (Tasty(x) -> Through(x)) -> therefore Through(moses) Through(moses) and forall x (Through(x) -> Florentine(x)) -> therefore Florentine(moses) Florentine(moses) and Tasty(moses) and forall x (Florentine(x) and Tasty(x) -> Mousy(x)) -> therefore Mousy(moses)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Becki is mutant. Leonanie is moravian. Maxy is manful. Carley is pictorial. If someone is anile and moravian then they are coincident. Rough, mutant people are antic. All antic people are anile. All mutant people are antic. If someone is moravian then they are antic. All antic people are anile. Maxy is not antic.", "logic": "\nMutant(becki)\nMoravian(leonanie)\nManful(maxy)\nPictorial(carley)\nforall x (Anile(x) and Moravian(x) -> Coincident(x))\nforall x (Anile(x) and Mutant(x) -> Antic(x))\nforall x (Antic(x) -> Anile(x))\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> Antic(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> Antic(x))\nforall x (Antic(x) -> Anile(x))\n\nnot Antic(maxy)\n\nforall x (Anile(x) and Mutant(x) -> Antic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Flori is mercuric. Glynn is mutable. Sidoney is dispersed. Wynton is denotive. If someone is uncomplete and mutable then they are behavioral. Rough, mercuric people are anuric. All anuric people are uncomplete. All mercuric people are anuric. If someone is mutable then they are anuric. All anuric people are uncomplete. Wynton is uncomplete.", "logic": "\nMercuric(flori)\nMutable(glynn)\nDispersed(sidoney)\nDenotive(wynton)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Mutable(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Mercuric(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Mutable(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\n\nUncomplete(wynton)\n\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Uncomplete(x)) <- forall x (Uncomplete(x) and Mercuric(x) -> Anuric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Uta is umbellate. Cheri is nepalese. Frazier is delusory. Hannie is graspable. If someone is rugged and nepalese then they are fake. Rough, umbellate people are marbleized. All marbleized people are rugged. All umbellate people are marbleized. If someone is nepalese then they are marbleized. All marbleized people are rugged. Frazier is not fake.", "logic": "\nUmbellate(uta)\nNepalese(cheri)\nDelusory(frazier)\nGraspable(hannie)\nforall x (Rugged(x) and Nepalese(x) -> Fake(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Marbleized(x))\nforall x (Marbleized(x) -> Rugged(x))\nforall x (Umbellate(x) -> Marbleized(x))\nforall x (Nepalese(x) -> Marbleized(x))\nforall x (Marbleized(x) -> Rugged(x))\n\nnot Fake(frazier)\n\nforall x (Rugged(x) and Nepalese(x) -> Fake(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Stormie is omniscient. Genovera is aphasic. Jenni is spastic. Amandie is unfeigned. If someone is insurable and aphasic then they are colorful. Rough, omniscient people are eastward. All eastward people are insurable. All omniscient people are eastward. If someone is aphasic then they are eastward. All eastward people are insurable. Jenni is insurable.", "logic": "\nOmniscient(stormie)\nAphasic(genovera)\nSpastic(jenni)\nUnfeigned(amandie)\nforall x (Insurable(x) and Aphasic(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Insurable(x) and Omniscient(x) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Insurable(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Aphasic(x) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Insurable(x))\n\nInsurable(jenni)\n\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Insurable(x)) <- forall x (Insurable(x) and Omniscient(x) -> Eastward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Birgitta is perforate. Arlyne is weatherly. Vanda is unbowed. Algernon is casebook. If someone is assured and weatherly then they are sundry. Rough, perforate people are millennial. All millennial people are assured. All perforate people are millennial. If someone is weatherly then they are millennial. All millennial people are assured. Algernon is not weatherly.", "logic": "\nPerforate(birgitta)\nWeatherly(arlyne)\nUnbowed(vanda)\nCasebook(algernon)\nforall x (Assured(x) and Weatherly(x) -> Sundry(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) and Perforate(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Millennial(x) -> Assured(x))\nforall x (Perforate(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Millennial(x) -> Assured(x))\n\nnot Weatherly(algernon)\n\nnot Weatherly(algernon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Janie is quarterly. Octavius is related. Rebekkah is welcome. Barris is stovepiped. If someone is limbed and related then they are pilose. Rough, quarterly people are maimed. All maimed people are limbed. All quarterly people are maimed. If someone is related then they are maimed. All maimed people are limbed. Octavius is stovepiped.", "logic": "\nQuarterly(janie)\nRelated(octavius)\nWelcome(rebekkah)\nStovepiped(barris)\nforall x (Limbed(x) and Related(x) -> Pilose(x))\nforall x (Limbed(x) and Quarterly(x) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Maimed(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Quarterly(x) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Related(x) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Maimed(x) -> Limbed(x))\n\nStovepiped(octavius)\n\nStovepiped(octavius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Carlee is devoted. Astra is primary. Antonella is ladened. Letty is kept. If someone is expressed and primary then they are hasty. Rough, devoted people are coeval. All coeval people are expressed. All devoted people are coeval. If someone is primary then they are coeval. All coeval people are expressed. Antonella is not kept.", "logic": "\nDevoted(carlee)\nPrimary(astra)\nLadened(antonella)\nKept(letty)\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Primary(x) -> Hasty(x))\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Devoted(x) -> Coeval(x))\nforall x (Coeval(x) -> Expressed(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Coeval(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Coeval(x))\nforall x (Coeval(x) -> Expressed(x))\n\nnot Kept(antonella)\n\nnot Kept(antonella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Frazier is exceeding. Pat is imaginary. Malcah is fateful. Charil is triplex. If someone is dormant and imaginary then they are roofless. Rough, exceeding people are myelinated. All myelinated people are dormant. All exceeding people are myelinated. If someone is imaginary then they are myelinated. All myelinated people are dormant. Charil is fateful.", "logic": "\nExceeding(frazier)\nImaginary(pat)\nFateful(malcah)\nTriplex(charil)\nforall x (Dormant(x) and Imaginary(x) -> Roofless(x))\nforall x (Dormant(x) and Exceeding(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) -> Dormant(x))\nforall x (Exceeding(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Imaginary(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) -> Dormant(x))\n\nFateful(charil)\n\nFateful(charil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "The bayard is falling. The bayard disincline the hadrian. The bayard centralize the gustavus. The mellisent disincline the gustavus. The gustavus fritter the bayard. The gustavus centralize the bayard. The hadrian fritter the mellisent. If someone centralize the gustavus then the gustavus fritter the hadrian. If the bayard is reverend and the bayard does not need the hadrian then the bayard centralize the mellisent. If someone fritter the hadrian then the hadrian centralize the bayard. If someone fritter the bayard and the bayard is commensal then the bayard does not see the hadrian. If someone disincline the hadrian then the hadrian centralize the mellisent. If someone centralize the mellisent and they see the bayard then the mellisent centralize the bayard. If the hadrian fritter the mellisent then the hadrian disincline the bayard. If someone fritter the hadrian and the hadrian disincline the bayard then the bayard is not baleful. The bayard centralize the gustavus.", "logic": "\nFalling(bayard)\nDisincline(bayard, hadrian)\nCentralize(bayard, gustavus)\nDisincline(mellisent, gustavus)\nFritter(gustavus, bayard)\nCentralize(gustavus, bayard)\nFritter(hadrian, mellisent)\nforall x (Centralize(x, gustavus) -> Fritter(gustavus, hadrian))\nReverend(bayard) and not Disincline(bayard, hadrian) -> Centralize(bayard, mellisent)\nforall x (Fritter(x, hadrian) -> Centralize(hadrian, bayard))\nforall x (Fritter(x, bayard) and Commensal(bayard) -> not Centralize(bayard, hadrian))\nforall x (Disincline(x, hadrian) -> Centralize(hadrian, mellisent))\nforall x (Centralize(x, mellisent) and Centralize(x, bayard) -> Centralize(mellisent, bayard))\nFritter(hadrian, mellisent) -> Disincline(hadrian, bayard)\nforall x (Fritter(x, hadrian) and Disincline(hadrian, bayard) -> not Baleful(bayard))\n\nCentralize(bayard, gustavus)\n\ntherefore Centralize(bayard, gustavus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The marlene is ripened. The marlene bandy the starla. The marlene throttle the odilia. The kizzee bandy the odilia. The odilia outbid the marlene. The odilia throttle the marlene. The starla outbid the kizzee. If someone throttle the odilia then the odilia outbid the starla. If the marlene is vedic and the marlene does not need the starla then the marlene throttle the kizzee. If someone outbid the starla then the starla throttle the marlene. If someone outbid the marlene and the marlene is high then the marlene does not see the starla. If someone bandy the starla then the starla throttle the kizzee. If someone throttle the kizzee and they see the marlene then the kizzee throttle the marlene. If the starla outbid the kizzee then the starla bandy the marlene. If someone outbid the starla and the starla bandy the marlene then the marlene is not linked. The marlene does not see the odilia.", "logic": "\nRipened(marlene)\nBandy(marlene, starla)\nThrottle(marlene, odilia)\nBandy(kizzee, odilia)\nOutbid(odilia, marlene)\nThrottle(odilia, marlene)\nOutbid(starla, kizzee)\nforall x (Throttle(x, odilia) -> Outbid(odilia, starla))\nVedic(marlene) and not Bandy(marlene, starla) -> Throttle(marlene, kizzee)\nforall x (Outbid(x, starla) -> Throttle(starla, marlene))\nforall x (Outbid(x, marlene) and High(marlene) -> not Throttle(marlene, starla))\nforall x (Bandy(x, starla) -> Throttle(starla, kizzee))\nforall x (Throttle(x, kizzee) and Throttle(x, marlene) -> Throttle(kizzee, marlene))\nOutbid(starla, kizzee) -> Bandy(starla, marlene)\nforall x (Outbid(x, starla) and Bandy(starla, marlene) -> not Linked(marlene))\n\nnot Throttle(marlene, odilia)\n\ntherefore Throttle(marlene, odilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The ivory is volumetric. The ivory sightsing the ash. The ivory machine the leiah. The kessia sightsing the leiah. The leiah federalise the ivory. The leiah machine the ivory. The ash federalise the kessia. If someone machine the leiah then the leiah federalise the ash. If the ivory is stalinist and the ivory does not need the ash then the ivory machine the kessia. If someone federalise the ash then the ash machine the ivory. If someone federalise the ivory and the ivory is expert then the ivory does not see the ash. If someone sightsing the ash then the ash machine the kessia. If someone machine the kessia and they see the ivory then the kessia machine the ivory. If the ash federalise the kessia then the ash sightsing the ivory. If someone federalise the ash and the ash sightsing the ivory then the ivory is not velvety. The ash sightsing the ivory.", "logic": "\nVolumetric(ivory)\nSightsing(ivory, ash)\nMachine(ivory, leiah)\nSightsing(kessia, leiah)\nFederalise(leiah, ivory)\nMachine(leiah, ivory)\nFederalise(ash, kessia)\nforall x (Machine(x, leiah) -> Federalise(leiah, ash))\nStalinist(ivory) and not Sightsing(ivory, ash) -> Machine(ivory, kessia)\nforall x (Federalise(x, ash) -> Machine(ash, ivory))\nforall x (Federalise(x, ivory) and Expert(ivory) -> not Machine(ivory, ash))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, ash) -> Machine(ash, kessia))\nforall x (Machine(x, kessia) and Machine(x, ivory) -> Machine(kessia, ivory))\nFederalise(ash, kessia) -> Sightsing(ash, ivory)\nforall x (Federalise(x, ash) and Sightsing(ash, ivory) -> not Velvety(ivory))\n\nSightsing(ash, ivory)\n\nFederalise(ash, kessia) and Federalise(ash, kessia) -> Sightsing(ash, ivory) -> therefore Sightsing(ash, ivory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The lianna is biform. The lianna support the nelson. The lianna shallow the amandie. The daren support the amandie. The amandie dynamite the lianna. The amandie shallow the lianna. The nelson dynamite the daren. If someone shallow the amandie then the amandie dynamite the nelson. If the lianna is initial and the lianna does not need the nelson then the lianna shallow the daren. If someone dynamite the nelson then the nelson shallow the lianna. If someone dynamite the lianna and the lianna is erect then the lianna does not see the nelson. If someone support the nelson then the nelson shallow the daren. If someone shallow the daren and they see the lianna then the daren shallow the lianna. If the nelson dynamite the daren then the nelson support the lianna. If someone dynamite the nelson and the nelson support the lianna then the lianna is not inchoate. The amandie does not like the nelson.", "logic": "\nBiform(lianna)\nSupport(lianna, nelson)\nShallow(lianna, amandie)\nSupport(daren, amandie)\nDynamite(amandie, lianna)\nShallow(amandie, lianna)\nDynamite(nelson, daren)\nforall x (Shallow(x, amandie) -> Dynamite(amandie, nelson))\nInitial(lianna) and not Support(lianna, nelson) -> Shallow(lianna, daren)\nforall x (Dynamite(x, nelson) -> Shallow(nelson, lianna))\nforall x (Dynamite(x, lianna) and Erect(lianna) -> not Shallow(lianna, nelson))\nforall x (Support(x, nelson) -> Shallow(nelson, daren))\nforall x (Shallow(x, daren) and Shallow(x, lianna) -> Shallow(daren, lianna))\nDynamite(nelson, daren) -> Support(nelson, lianna)\nforall x (Dynamite(x, nelson) and Support(nelson, lianna) -> not Inchoate(lianna))\n\nnot Dynamite(amandie, nelson)\n\nShallow(lianna, amandie) and forall x (Shallow(x, amandie) -> Dynamite(amandie, nelson)) -> therefore Dynamite(amandie, nelson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The catarina is toothless. The catarina despise the lem. The catarina volunteer the ken. The merrielle despise the ken. The ken bunt the catarina. The ken volunteer the catarina. The lem bunt the merrielle. If someone volunteer the ken then the ken bunt the lem. If the catarina is fraught and the catarina does not need the lem then the catarina volunteer the merrielle. If someone bunt the lem then the lem volunteer the catarina. If someone bunt the catarina and the catarina is legitimate then the catarina does not see the lem. If someone despise the lem then the lem volunteer the merrielle. If someone volunteer the merrielle and they see the catarina then the merrielle volunteer the catarina. If the lem bunt the merrielle then the lem despise the catarina. If someone bunt the lem and the lem despise the catarina then the catarina is not rushy. The lem volunteer the catarina.", "logic": "\nToothless(catarina)\nDespise(catarina, lem)\nVolunteer(catarina, ken)\nDespise(merrielle, ken)\nBunt(ken, catarina)\nVolunteer(ken, catarina)\nBunt(lem, merrielle)\nforall x (Volunteer(x, ken) -> Bunt(ken, lem))\nFraught(catarina) and not Despise(catarina, lem) -> Volunteer(catarina, merrielle)\nforall x (Bunt(x, lem) -> Volunteer(lem, catarina))\nforall x (Bunt(x, catarina) and Legitimate(catarina) -> not Volunteer(catarina, lem))\nforall x (Despise(x, lem) -> Volunteer(lem, merrielle))\nforall x (Volunteer(x, merrielle) and Volunteer(x, catarina) -> Volunteer(merrielle, catarina))\nBunt(lem, merrielle) -> Despise(lem, catarina)\nforall x (Bunt(x, lem) and Despise(lem, catarina) -> not Rushy(catarina))\n\nVolunteer(lem, catarina)\n\nVolunteer(catarina, ken) and forall x (Volunteer(x, ken) -> Bunt(ken, lem)) -> therefore Bunt(ken, lem) Bunt(ken, lem) and forall x (Bunt(x, lem) -> Volunteer(lem, catarina)) -> therefore Volunteer(lem, catarina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The rosalinda is patristic. The rosalinda madrigal the jilleen. The rosalinda poise the jacinda. The zacharia madrigal the jacinda. The jacinda imagine the rosalinda. The jacinda poise the rosalinda. The jilleen imagine the zacharia. If someone poise the jacinda then the jacinda imagine the jilleen. If the rosalinda is suspected and the rosalinda does not need the jilleen then the rosalinda poise the zacharia. If someone imagine the jilleen then the jilleen poise the rosalinda. If someone imagine the rosalinda and the rosalinda is unpeaceful then the rosalinda does not see the jilleen. If someone madrigal the jilleen then the jilleen poise the zacharia. If someone poise the zacharia and they see the rosalinda then the zacharia poise the rosalinda. If the jilleen imagine the zacharia then the jilleen madrigal the rosalinda. If someone imagine the jilleen and the jilleen madrigal the rosalinda then the rosalinda is not throated. The rosalinda is throated.", "logic": "\nPatristic(rosalinda)\nMadrigal(rosalinda, jilleen)\nPoise(rosalinda, jacinda)\nMadrigal(zacharia, jacinda)\nImagine(jacinda, rosalinda)\nPoise(jacinda, rosalinda)\nImagine(jilleen, zacharia)\nforall x (Poise(x, jacinda) -> Imagine(jacinda, jilleen))\nSuspected(rosalinda) and not Madrigal(rosalinda, jilleen) -> Poise(rosalinda, zacharia)\nforall x (Imagine(x, jilleen) -> Poise(jilleen, rosalinda))\nforall x (Imagine(x, rosalinda) and Unpeaceful(rosalinda) -> not Poise(rosalinda, jilleen))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, jilleen) -> Poise(jilleen, zacharia))\nforall x (Poise(x, zacharia) and Poise(x, rosalinda) -> Poise(zacharia, rosalinda))\nImagine(jilleen, zacharia) -> Madrigal(jilleen, rosalinda)\nforall x (Imagine(x, jilleen) and Madrigal(jilleen, rosalinda) -> not Throated(rosalinda))\n\nThroated(rosalinda)\n\nPoise(rosalinda, jacinda) and forall x (Poise(x, jacinda) -> Imagine(jacinda, jilleen)) -> therefore Imagine(jacinda, jilleen) Imagine(jilleen, zacharia) and Imagine(jilleen, zacharia) -> Madrigal(jilleen, rosalinda) -> therefore Madrigal(jilleen, rosalinda) Imagine(jacinda, jilleen) and Madrigal(jilleen, rosalinda) and forall x (Imagine(x, jilleen) and Madrigal(jilleen, rosalinda) -> not Throated(rosalinda)) -> therefore not Throated(rosalinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The hadrian is plus. The hadrian shinny the wayland. The hadrian cord the rex. The hendrik shinny the rex. The rex comply the hadrian. The rex cord the hadrian. The wayland comply the hendrik. If someone cord the rex then the rex comply the wayland. If the hadrian is unhurt and the hadrian does not need the wayland then the hadrian cord the hendrik. If someone comply the wayland then the wayland cord the hadrian. If someone comply the hadrian and the hadrian is sized then the hadrian does not see the wayland. If someone shinny the wayland then the wayland cord the hendrik. If someone cord the hendrik and they see the hadrian then the hendrik cord the hadrian. If the wayland comply the hendrik then the wayland shinny the hadrian. If someone comply the wayland and the wayland shinny the hadrian then the hadrian is not changeful. The hendrik cord the hadrian.", "logic": "\nPlus(hadrian)\nShinny(hadrian, wayland)\nCord(hadrian, rex)\nShinny(hendrik, rex)\nComply(rex, hadrian)\nCord(rex, hadrian)\nComply(wayland, hendrik)\nforall x (Cord(x, rex) -> Comply(rex, wayland))\nUnhurt(hadrian) and not Shinny(hadrian, wayland) -> Cord(hadrian, hendrik)\nforall x (Comply(x, wayland) -> Cord(wayland, hadrian))\nforall x (Comply(x, hadrian) and Sized(hadrian) -> not Cord(hadrian, wayland))\nforall x (Shinny(x, wayland) -> Cord(wayland, hendrik))\nforall x (Cord(x, hendrik) and Cord(x, hadrian) -> Cord(hendrik, hadrian))\nComply(wayland, hendrik) -> Shinny(wayland, hadrian)\nforall x (Comply(x, wayland) and Shinny(wayland, hadrian) -> not Changeful(hadrian))\n\nCord(hendrik, hadrian)\n\nShinny(hadrian, wayland) and forall x (Shinny(x, wayland) -> Cord(wayland, hendrik)) -> therefore Cord(wayland, hendrik) Cord(hadrian, rex) and forall x (Cord(x, rex) -> Comply(rex, wayland)) -> therefore Comply(rex, wayland) Comply(rex, wayland) and forall x (Comply(x, wayland) -> Cord(wayland, hadrian)) -> therefore Cord(wayland, hadrian) Cord(wayland, hendrik) and Cord(wayland, hadrian) and forall x (Cord(x, hendrik) and Cord(x, hadrian) -> Cord(hendrik, hadrian)) -> therefore Cord(hendrik, hadrian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The flo is popliteal. The flo screen the kaye. The flo debug the fanchette. The darline screen the fanchette. The fanchette caravan the flo. The fanchette debug the flo. The kaye caravan the darline. If someone debug the fanchette then the fanchette caravan the kaye. If the flo is tipsy and the flo does not need the kaye then the flo debug the darline. If someone caravan the kaye then the kaye debug the flo. If someone caravan the flo and the flo is elliptic then the flo does not see the kaye. If someone screen the kaye then the kaye debug the darline. If someone debug the darline and they see the flo then the darline debug the flo. If the kaye caravan the darline then the kaye screen the flo. If someone caravan the kaye and the kaye screen the flo then the flo is not coenobitic. The darline does not see the flo.", "logic": "\nPopliteal(flo)\nScreen(flo, kaye)\nDebug(flo, fanchette)\nScreen(darline, fanchette)\nCaravan(fanchette, flo)\nDebug(fanchette, flo)\nCaravan(kaye, darline)\nforall x (Debug(x, fanchette) -> Caravan(fanchette, kaye))\nTipsy(flo) and not Screen(flo, kaye) -> Debug(flo, darline)\nforall x (Caravan(x, kaye) -> Debug(kaye, flo))\nforall x (Caravan(x, flo) and Elliptic(flo) -> not Debug(flo, kaye))\nforall x (Screen(x, kaye) -> Debug(kaye, darline))\nforall x (Debug(x, darline) and Debug(x, flo) -> Debug(darline, flo))\nCaravan(kaye, darline) -> Screen(kaye, flo)\nforall x (Caravan(x, kaye) and Screen(kaye, flo) -> not Coenobitic(flo))\n\nnot Debug(darline, flo)\n\nScreen(flo, kaye) and forall x (Screen(x, kaye) -> Debug(kaye, darline)) -> therefore Debug(kaye, darline) Debug(flo, fanchette) and forall x (Debug(x, fanchette) -> Caravan(fanchette, kaye)) -> therefore Caravan(fanchette, kaye) Caravan(fanchette, kaye) and forall x (Caravan(x, kaye) -> Debug(kaye, flo)) -> therefore Debug(kaye, flo) Debug(kaye, darline) and Debug(kaye, flo) and forall x (Debug(x, darline) and Debug(x, flo) -> Debug(darline, flo)) -> therefore Debug(darline, flo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The denise is stormbound. The denise becalm the teddi. The denise coiffe the amelie. The ethelda becalm the amelie. The amelie subtilize the denise. The amelie coiffe the denise. The teddi subtilize the ethelda. If someone coiffe the amelie then the amelie subtilize the teddi. If the denise is sixth and the denise does not need the teddi then the denise coiffe the ethelda. If someone subtilize the teddi then the teddi coiffe the denise. If someone subtilize the denise and the denise is scholarly then the denise does not see the teddi. If someone becalm the teddi then the teddi coiffe the ethelda. If someone coiffe the ethelda and they see the denise then the ethelda coiffe the denise. If the teddi subtilize the ethelda then the teddi becalm the denise. If someone subtilize the teddi and the teddi becalm the denise then the denise is not afraid. The denise does not see the ethelda.", "logic": "\nStormbound(denise)\nBecalm(denise, teddi)\nCoiffe(denise, amelie)\nBecalm(ethelda, amelie)\nSubtilize(amelie, denise)\nCoiffe(amelie, denise)\nSubtilize(teddi, ethelda)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, amelie) -> Subtilize(amelie, teddi))\nSixth(denise) and not Becalm(denise, teddi) -> Coiffe(denise, ethelda)\nforall x (Subtilize(x, teddi) -> Coiffe(teddi, denise))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, denise) and Scholarly(denise) -> not Coiffe(denise, teddi))\nforall x (Becalm(x, teddi) -> Coiffe(teddi, ethelda))\nforall x (Coiffe(x, ethelda) and Coiffe(x, denise) -> Coiffe(ethelda, denise))\nSubtilize(teddi, ethelda) -> Becalm(teddi, denise)\nforall x (Subtilize(x, teddi) and Becalm(teddi, denise) -> not Afraid(denise))\n\nnot Coiffe(denise, ethelda)\n\nSixth(denise) and not Becalm(denise, teddi) -> Coiffe(denise, ethelda) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The alf is smothering. The alf thresh the tiff. The alf button the giff. The gwenore thresh the giff. The giff pussyfoot the alf. The giff button the alf. The tiff pussyfoot the gwenore. If someone button the giff then the giff pussyfoot the tiff. If the alf is braless and the alf does not need the tiff then the alf button the gwenore. If someone pussyfoot the tiff then the tiff button the alf. If someone pussyfoot the alf and the alf is striped then the alf does not see the tiff. If someone thresh the tiff then the tiff button the gwenore. If someone button the gwenore and they see the alf then the gwenore button the alf. If the tiff pussyfoot the gwenore then the tiff thresh the alf. If someone pussyfoot the tiff and the tiff thresh the alf then the alf is not smoldering. The alf thresh the giff.", "logic": "\nSmothering(alf)\nThresh(alf, tiff)\nButton(alf, giff)\nThresh(gwenore, giff)\nPussyfoot(giff, alf)\nButton(giff, alf)\nPussyfoot(tiff, gwenore)\nforall x (Button(x, giff) -> Pussyfoot(giff, tiff))\nBraless(alf) and not Thresh(alf, tiff) -> Button(alf, gwenore)\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, tiff) -> Button(tiff, alf))\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, alf) and Striped(alf) -> not Button(alf, tiff))\nforall x (Thresh(x, tiff) -> Button(tiff, gwenore))\nforall x (Button(x, gwenore) and Button(x, alf) -> Button(gwenore, alf))\nPussyfoot(tiff, gwenore) -> Thresh(tiff, alf)\nforall x (Pussyfoot(x, tiff) and Thresh(tiff, alf) -> not Smoldering(alf))\n\nThresh(alf, giff)\n\nThresh(alf, giff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The mabelle is barbadian. The mabelle chevy the paddy. The mabelle vacation the betti. The roz chevy the betti. The betti grok the mabelle. The betti vacation the mabelle. The paddy grok the roz. If someone vacation the betti then the betti grok the paddy. If the mabelle is practiced and the mabelle does not need the paddy then the mabelle vacation the roz. If someone grok the paddy then the paddy vacation the mabelle. If someone grok the mabelle and the mabelle is hermitic then the mabelle does not see the paddy. If someone chevy the paddy then the paddy vacation the roz. If someone vacation the roz and they see the mabelle then the roz vacation the mabelle. If the paddy grok the roz then the paddy chevy the mabelle. If someone grok the paddy and the paddy chevy the mabelle then the mabelle is not muddied. The roz does not like the roz.", "logic": "\nBarbadian(mabelle)\nChevy(mabelle, paddy)\nVacation(mabelle, betti)\nChevy(roz, betti)\nGrok(betti, mabelle)\nVacation(betti, mabelle)\nGrok(paddy, roz)\nforall x (Vacation(x, betti) -> Grok(betti, paddy))\nPracticed(mabelle) and not Chevy(mabelle, paddy) -> Vacation(mabelle, roz)\nforall x (Grok(x, paddy) -> Vacation(paddy, mabelle))\nforall x (Grok(x, mabelle) and Hermitic(mabelle) -> not Vacation(mabelle, paddy))\nforall x (Chevy(x, paddy) -> Vacation(paddy, roz))\nforall x (Vacation(x, roz) and Vacation(x, mabelle) -> Vacation(roz, mabelle))\nGrok(paddy, roz) -> Chevy(paddy, mabelle)\nforall x (Grok(x, paddy) and Chevy(paddy, mabelle) -> not Muddied(mabelle))\n\nnot Grok(roz, roz)\n\nnot Grok(roz, roz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The jonas is subatomic. The jonas trifurcate the gertrud. The jonas transfer the bela. The dolores trifurcate the bela. The bela invalidate the jonas. The bela transfer the jonas. The gertrud invalidate the dolores. If someone transfer the bela then the bela invalidate the gertrud. If the jonas is hastate and the jonas does not need the gertrud then the jonas transfer the dolores. If someone invalidate the gertrud then the gertrud transfer the jonas. If someone invalidate the jonas and the jonas is baptistic then the jonas does not see the gertrud. If someone trifurcate the gertrud then the gertrud transfer the dolores. If someone transfer the dolores and they see the jonas then the dolores transfer the jonas. If the gertrud invalidate the dolores then the gertrud trifurcate the jonas. If someone invalidate the gertrud and the gertrud trifurcate the jonas then the jonas is not erogenous. The bela invalidate the dolores.", "logic": "\nSubatomic(jonas)\nTrifurcate(jonas, gertrud)\nTransfer(jonas, bela)\nTrifurcate(dolores, bela)\nInvalidate(bela, jonas)\nTransfer(bela, jonas)\nInvalidate(gertrud, dolores)\nforall x (Transfer(x, bela) -> Invalidate(bela, gertrud))\nHastate(jonas) and not Trifurcate(jonas, gertrud) -> Transfer(jonas, dolores)\nforall x (Invalidate(x, gertrud) -> Transfer(gertrud, jonas))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, jonas) and Baptistic(jonas) -> not Transfer(jonas, gertrud))\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, gertrud) -> Transfer(gertrud, dolores))\nforall x (Transfer(x, dolores) and Transfer(x, jonas) -> Transfer(dolores, jonas))\nInvalidate(gertrud, dolores) -> Trifurcate(gertrud, jonas)\nforall x (Invalidate(x, gertrud) and Trifurcate(gertrud, jonas) -> not Erogenous(jonas))\n\nInvalidate(bela, dolores)\n\nInvalidate(bela, dolores) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The rebecca is caseous. The rebecca effloresce the wit. The rebecca seethe the joni. The britta effloresce the joni. The joni skyjack the rebecca. The joni seethe the rebecca. The wit skyjack the britta. If someone seethe the joni then the joni skyjack the wit. If the rebecca is brainish and the rebecca does not need the wit then the rebecca seethe the britta. If someone skyjack the wit then the wit seethe the rebecca. If someone skyjack the rebecca and the rebecca is noticeable then the rebecca does not see the wit. If someone effloresce the wit then the wit seethe the britta. If someone seethe the britta and they see the rebecca then the britta seethe the rebecca. If the wit skyjack the britta then the wit effloresce the rebecca. If someone skyjack the wit and the wit effloresce the rebecca then the rebecca is not connected. The britta does not need the wit.", "logic": "\nCaseous(rebecca)\nEffloresce(rebecca, wit)\nSeethe(rebecca, joni)\nEffloresce(britta, joni)\nSkyjack(joni, rebecca)\nSeethe(joni, rebecca)\nSkyjack(wit, britta)\nforall x (Seethe(x, joni) -> Skyjack(joni, wit))\nBrainish(rebecca) and not Effloresce(rebecca, wit) -> Seethe(rebecca, britta)\nforall x (Skyjack(x, wit) -> Seethe(wit, rebecca))\nforall x (Skyjack(x, rebecca) and Noticeable(rebecca) -> not Seethe(rebecca, wit))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, wit) -> Seethe(wit, britta))\nforall x (Seethe(x, britta) and Seethe(x, rebecca) -> Seethe(britta, rebecca))\nSkyjack(wit, britta) -> Effloresce(wit, rebecca)\nforall x (Skyjack(x, wit) and Effloresce(wit, rebecca) -> not Connected(rebecca))\n\nnot Effloresce(britta, wit)\n\nnot Effloresce(britta, wit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The berkeley is reverse. The berkeley mimeograph the angie. The berkeley puff the aubrie. The kostas mimeograph the aubrie. The aubrie wring the berkeley. The aubrie puff the berkeley. The angie wring the kostas. If someone puff the aubrie then the aubrie wring the angie. If the berkeley is grenadian and the berkeley does not need the angie then the berkeley puff the kostas. If someone wring the angie then the angie puff the berkeley. If someone wring the berkeley and the berkeley is disclike then the berkeley does not see the angie. If someone mimeograph the angie then the angie puff the kostas. If someone puff the kostas and they see the berkeley then the kostas puff the berkeley. If the angie wring the kostas then the angie mimeograph the berkeley. If someone wring the angie and the angie mimeograph the berkeley then the berkeley is not casebook. The angie mimeograph the kostas.", "logic": "\nReverse(berkeley)\nMimeograph(berkeley, angie)\nPuff(berkeley, aubrie)\nMimeograph(kostas, aubrie)\nWring(aubrie, berkeley)\nPuff(aubrie, berkeley)\nWring(angie, kostas)\nforall x (Puff(x, aubrie) -> Wring(aubrie, angie))\nGrenadian(berkeley) and not Mimeograph(berkeley, angie) -> Puff(berkeley, kostas)\nforall x (Wring(x, angie) -> Puff(angie, berkeley))\nforall x (Wring(x, berkeley) and Disclike(berkeley) -> not Puff(berkeley, angie))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, angie) -> Puff(angie, kostas))\nforall x (Puff(x, kostas) and Puff(x, berkeley) -> Puff(kostas, berkeley))\nWring(angie, kostas) -> Mimeograph(angie, berkeley)\nforall x (Wring(x, angie) and Mimeograph(angie, berkeley) -> not Casebook(berkeley))\n\nMimeograph(angie, kostas)\n\nMimeograph(angie, kostas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The ella is untroubled. The ella warn the herbie. The ella ricochet the janean. The shell warn the janean. The janean inunct the ella. The janean ricochet the ella. The herbie inunct the shell. If someone ricochet the janean then the janean inunct the herbie. If the ella is eyeless and the ella does not need the herbie then the ella ricochet the shell. If someone inunct the herbie then the herbie ricochet the ella. If someone inunct the ella and the ella is slavonic then the ella does not see the herbie. If someone warn the herbie then the herbie ricochet the shell. If someone ricochet the shell and they see the ella then the shell ricochet the ella. If the herbie inunct the shell then the herbie warn the ella. If someone inunct the herbie and the herbie warn the ella then the ella is not laciniate. The ella does not like the ella.", "logic": "\nUntroubled(ella)\nWarn(ella, herbie)\nRicochet(ella, janean)\nWarn(shell, janean)\nInunct(janean, ella)\nRicochet(janean, ella)\nInunct(herbie, shell)\nforall x (Ricochet(x, janean) -> Inunct(janean, herbie))\nEyeless(ella) and not Warn(ella, herbie) -> Ricochet(ella, shell)\nforall x (Inunct(x, herbie) -> Ricochet(herbie, ella))\nforall x (Inunct(x, ella) and Slavonic(ella) -> not Ricochet(ella, herbie))\nforall x (Warn(x, herbie) -> Ricochet(herbie, shell))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, shell) and Ricochet(x, ella) -> Ricochet(shell, ella))\nInunct(herbie, shell) -> Warn(herbie, ella)\nforall x (Inunct(x, herbie) and Warn(herbie, ella) -> not Laciniate(ella))\n\nnot Inunct(ella, ella)\n\nnot Inunct(ella, ella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The didi is concerned. The didi correspond the normand. The didi taste the rudolfo. The alexis correspond the rudolfo. The rudolfo coil the didi. The rudolfo taste the didi. The normand coil the alexis. If someone taste the rudolfo then the rudolfo coil the normand. If the didi is bone and the didi does not need the normand then the didi taste the alexis. If someone coil the normand then the normand taste the didi. If someone coil the didi and the didi is fleshly then the didi does not see the normand. If someone correspond the normand then the normand taste the alexis. If someone taste the alexis and they see the didi then the alexis taste the didi. If the normand coil the alexis then the normand correspond the didi. If someone coil the normand and the normand correspond the didi then the didi is not crabby. The didi taste the normand.", "logic": "\nConcerned(didi)\nCorrespond(didi, normand)\nTaste(didi, rudolfo)\nCorrespond(alexis, rudolfo)\nCoil(rudolfo, didi)\nTaste(rudolfo, didi)\nCoil(normand, alexis)\nforall x (Taste(x, rudolfo) -> Coil(rudolfo, normand))\nBone(didi) and not Correspond(didi, normand) -> Taste(didi, alexis)\nforall x (Coil(x, normand) -> Taste(normand, didi))\nforall x (Coil(x, didi) and Fleshly(didi) -> not Taste(didi, normand))\nforall x (Correspond(x, normand) -> Taste(normand, alexis))\nforall x (Taste(x, alexis) and Taste(x, didi) -> Taste(alexis, didi))\nCoil(normand, alexis) -> Correspond(normand, didi)\nforall x (Coil(x, normand) and Correspond(normand, didi) -> not Crabby(didi))\n\nTaste(didi, normand)\n\nTaste(didi, normand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "Willetta is unrelieved. Nicola is melodic. Jasper is seductive. Jasper is morganatic. Jasper is dirty. Lyndsay is seductive. Lyndsay is echolike. All gregorian, echolike things are morganatic. Quiet things are melodic. All unrelieved things are melodic. If something is morganatic and gregorian then it is unrelieved. Kind things are gregorian. Quiet things are gregorian. Jasper is seductive.", "logic": "\nUnrelieved(willetta)\nMelodic(nicola)\nSeductive(jasper)\nMorganatic(jasper)\nDirty(jasper)\nSeductive(lyndsay)\nEcholike(lyndsay)\nforall x (Gregorian(x) and Echolike(x) -> Morganatic(x))\nforall x (Echolike(x) -> Melodic(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Melodic(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) and Gregorian(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) -> Gregorian(x))\nforall x (Echolike(x) -> Gregorian(x))\n\nSeductive(jasper)\n\ntherefore Seductive(jasper)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Margarita is molded. Harold is horned. Candi is untamed. Candi is amendatory. Candi is lordly. Jenette is untamed. Jenette is argentic. All anorthic, argentic things are amendatory. Quiet things are horned. All molded things are horned. If something is amendatory and anorthic then it is molded. Kind things are anorthic. Quiet things are anorthic. Candi is not amendatory.", "logic": "\nMolded(margarita)\nHorned(harold)\nUntamed(candi)\nAmendatory(candi)\nLordly(candi)\nUntamed(jenette)\nArgentic(jenette)\nforall x (Anorthic(x) and Argentic(x) -> Amendatory(x))\nforall x (Argentic(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Molded(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Amendatory(x) and Anorthic(x) -> Molded(x))\nforall x (Amendatory(x) -> Anorthic(x))\nforall x (Argentic(x) -> Anorthic(x))\n\nnot Amendatory(candi)\n\ntherefore Amendatory(candi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Adam is chelonian. Rica is unhardened. Ambrosio is bountiful. Ambrosio is indisposed. Ambrosio is renowned. Alonzo is bountiful. Alonzo is rallying. All unthinking, rallying things are indisposed. Quiet things are unhardened. All chelonian things are unhardened. If something is indisposed and unthinking then it is chelonian. Kind things are unthinking. Quiet things are unthinking. Alonzo is unthinking.", "logic": "\nChelonian(adam)\nUnhardened(rica)\nBountiful(ambrosio)\nIndisposed(ambrosio)\nRenowned(ambrosio)\nBountiful(alonzo)\nRallying(alonzo)\nforall x (Unthinking(x) and Rallying(x) -> Indisposed(x))\nforall x (Rallying(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and Unthinking(x) -> Chelonian(x))\nforall x (Indisposed(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Rallying(x) -> Unthinking(x))\n\nUnthinking(alonzo)\n\nRallying(alonzo) and forall x (Rallying(x) -> Unthinking(x)) -> therefore Unthinking(alonzo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Maribeth is unsexy. Terencio is recurring. Gordie is trabeate. Gordie is undefended. Gordie is rumpled. Diena is trabeate. Diena is bantu. All antic, bantu things are undefended. Quiet things are recurring. All unsexy things are recurring. If something is undefended and antic then it is unsexy. Kind things are antic. Quiet things are antic. Diena is not recurring.", "logic": "\nUnsexy(maribeth)\nRecurring(terencio)\nTrabeate(gordie)\nUndefended(gordie)\nRumpled(gordie)\nTrabeate(diena)\nBantu(diena)\nforall x (Antic(x) and Bantu(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Bantu(x) -> Recurring(x))\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Recurring(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) and Antic(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) -> Antic(x))\nforall x (Bantu(x) -> Antic(x))\n\nnot Recurring(diena)\n\nBantu(diena) and forall x (Bantu(x) -> Recurring(x)) -> therefore Recurring(diena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Angelique is unmovable. Ernestine is visaged. Marilu is murmurous. Marilu is ciliated. Marilu is tigerish. Tiphany is murmurous. Tiphany is flowing. All bellbottom, flowing things are ciliated. Quiet things are visaged. All unmovable things are visaged. If something is ciliated and bellbottom then it is unmovable. Kind things are bellbottom. Quiet things are bellbottom. Marilu is unmovable.", "logic": "\nUnmovable(angelique)\nVisaged(ernestine)\nMurmurous(marilu)\nCiliated(marilu)\nTigerish(marilu)\nMurmurous(tiphany)\nFlowing(tiphany)\nforall x (Bellbottom(x) and Flowing(x) -> Ciliated(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Visaged(x))\nforall x (Unmovable(x) -> Visaged(x))\nforall x (Ciliated(x) and Bellbottom(x) -> Unmovable(x))\nforall x (Ciliated(x) -> Bellbottom(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Bellbottom(x))\n\nUnmovable(marilu)\n\nCiliated(marilu) and forall x (Ciliated(x) -> Bellbottom(x)) -> therefore Bellbottom(marilu) Ciliated(marilu) and Bellbottom(marilu) and forall x (Ciliated(x) and Bellbottom(x) -> Unmovable(x)) -> therefore Unmovable(marilu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Carlos is stitched. Annice is muciferous. Andee is sordid. Andee is frosty. Andee is conic. Devondra is sordid. Devondra is touchy. All future, touchy things are frosty. Quiet things are muciferous. All stitched things are muciferous. If something is frosty and future then it is stitched. Kind things are future. Quiet things are future. Andee is not stitched.", "logic": "\nStitched(carlos)\nMuciferous(annice)\nSordid(andee)\nFrosty(andee)\nConic(andee)\nSordid(devondra)\nTouchy(devondra)\nforall x (Future(x) and Touchy(x) -> Frosty(x))\nforall x (Touchy(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Stitched(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Frosty(x) and Future(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Frosty(x) -> Future(x))\nforall x (Touchy(x) -> Future(x))\n\nnot Stitched(andee)\n\nFrosty(andee) and forall x (Frosty(x) -> Future(x)) -> therefore Future(andee) Frosty(andee) and Future(andee) and forall x (Frosty(x) and Future(x) -> Stitched(x)) -> therefore Stitched(andee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Mariska is arco. Neel is northmost. Jolee is burbly. Jolee is peroneal. Jolee is clxx. Gratia is burbly. Gratia is pendulous. All sallow, pendulous things are peroneal. Quiet things are northmost. All arco things are northmost. If something is peroneal and sallow then it is arco. Kind things are sallow. Quiet things are sallow. Gratia is arco.", "logic": "\nArco(mariska)\nNorthmost(neel)\nBurbly(jolee)\nPeroneal(jolee)\nClxx(jolee)\nBurbly(gratia)\nPendulous(gratia)\nforall x (Sallow(x) and Pendulous(x) -> Peroneal(x))\nforall x (Pendulous(x) -> Northmost(x))\nforall x (Arco(x) -> Northmost(x))\nforall x (Peroneal(x) and Sallow(x) -> Arco(x))\nforall x (Peroneal(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Pendulous(x) -> Sallow(x))\n\nArco(gratia)\n\nPendulous(gratia) and forall x (Pendulous(x) -> Sallow(x)) -> therefore Sallow(gratia) Sallow(gratia) and Pendulous(gratia) and forall x (Sallow(x) and Pendulous(x) -> Peroneal(x)) -> therefore Peroneal(gratia) Pendulous(gratia) and forall x (Pendulous(x) -> Sallow(x)) -> therefore Sallow(gratia) Peroneal(gratia) and Sallow(gratia) and forall x (Peroneal(x) and Sallow(x) -> Arco(x)) -> therefore Arco(gratia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Pier is hemophilic. Annora is zionist. Aleda is carinal. Aleda is goalless. Aleda is carbonous. Keely is carinal. Keely is puberulent. All epidemic, puberulent things are goalless. Quiet things are zionist. All hemophilic things are zionist. If something is goalless and epidemic then it is hemophilic. Kind things are epidemic. Quiet things are epidemic. Keely is not hemophilic.", "logic": "\nHemophilic(pier)\nZionist(annora)\nCarinal(aleda)\nGoalless(aleda)\nCarbonous(aleda)\nCarinal(keely)\nPuberulent(keely)\nforall x (Epidemic(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Goalless(x))\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) and Epidemic(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) -> Epidemic(x))\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Epidemic(x))\n\nnot Hemophilic(keely)\n\nPuberulent(keely) and forall x (Puberulent(x) -> Epidemic(x)) -> therefore Epidemic(keely) Epidemic(keely) and Puberulent(keely) and forall x (Epidemic(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Goalless(x)) -> therefore Goalless(keely) Puberulent(keely) and forall x (Puberulent(x) -> Epidemic(x)) -> therefore Epidemic(keely) Goalless(keely) and Epidemic(keely) and forall x (Goalless(x) and Epidemic(x) -> Hemophilic(x)) -> therefore Hemophilic(keely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Albertine is leggy. Elonore is crippling. Donnie is labiate. Donnie is fisheye. Donnie is anodyne. Caroljean is labiate. Caroljean is sunk. All musical, sunk things are fisheye. Quiet things are crippling. All leggy things are crippling. If something is fisheye and musical then it is leggy. Kind things are musical. Quiet things are musical. Elonore is not musical.", "logic": "\nLeggy(albertine)\nCrippling(elonore)\nLabiate(donnie)\nFisheye(donnie)\nAnodyne(donnie)\nLabiate(caroljean)\nSunk(caroljean)\nforall x (Musical(x) and Sunk(x) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Crippling(x))\nforall x (Leggy(x) -> Crippling(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) and Musical(x) -> Leggy(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Musical(x))\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Musical(x))\n\nnot Musical(elonore)\n\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Musical(x)) <- forall x (Musical(x) and Sunk(x) -> Fisheye(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Sisile is enormous. Faye is belittled. Callie is ariled. Callie is heavenly. Callie is intestinal. Tanney is ariled. Tanney is gloveless. All acarpous, gloveless things are heavenly. Quiet things are belittled. All enormous things are belittled. If something is heavenly and acarpous then it is enormous. Kind things are acarpous. Quiet things are acarpous. Sisile is acarpous.", "logic": "\nEnormous(sisile)\nBelittled(faye)\nAriled(callie)\nHeavenly(callie)\nIntestinal(callie)\nAriled(tanney)\nGloveless(tanney)\nforall x (Acarpous(x) and Gloveless(x) -> Heavenly(x))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Enormous(x) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) and Acarpous(x) -> Enormous(x))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) -> Acarpous(x))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> Acarpous(x))\n\nAcarpous(sisile)\n\nforall x (Heavenly(x) -> Acarpous(x)) <- forall x (Acarpous(x) and Gloveless(x) -> Heavenly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Melisse is comely. Fedora is grateful. Maurene is steadying. Maurene is sonsie. Maurene is skilled. Pamelina is steadying. Pamelina is isothermic. All vermilion, isothermic things are sonsie. Quiet things are grateful. All comely things are grateful. If something is sonsie and vermilion then it is comely. Kind things are vermilion. Quiet things are vermilion. Fedora is not sonsie.", "logic": "\nComely(melisse)\nGrateful(fedora)\nSteadying(maurene)\nSonsie(maurene)\nSkilled(maurene)\nSteadying(pamelina)\nIsothermic(pamelina)\nforall x (Vermilion(x) and Isothermic(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Isothermic(x) -> Grateful(x))\nforall x (Comely(x) -> Grateful(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) and Vermilion(x) -> Comely(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) -> Vermilion(x))\nforall x (Isothermic(x) -> Vermilion(x))\n\nnot Sonsie(fedora)\n\nforall x (Vermilion(x) and Isothermic(x) -> Sonsie(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Benita is unspoilt. Mikako is nonmotile. Corky is apophatic. Corky is spayed. Corky is prolonged. Gerta is apophatic. Gerta is payable. All rare, payable things are spayed. Quiet things are nonmotile. All unspoilt things are nonmotile. If something is spayed and rare then it is unspoilt. Kind things are rare. Quiet things are rare. Mikako is unspoilt.", "logic": "\nUnspoilt(benita)\nNonmotile(mikako)\nApophatic(corky)\nSpayed(corky)\nProlonged(corky)\nApophatic(gerta)\nPayable(gerta)\nforall x (Rare(x) and Payable(x) -> Spayed(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Nonmotile(x))\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) -> Nonmotile(x))\nforall x (Spayed(x) and Rare(x) -> Unspoilt(x))\nforall x (Spayed(x) -> Rare(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Rare(x))\n\nUnspoilt(mikako)\n\nforall x (Spayed(x) and Rare(x) -> Unspoilt(x)) <- forall x (Rare(x) and Payable(x) -> Spayed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Astrix is priceless. Ortensia is rightful. Tiffy is interfaith. Tiffy is predatory. Tiffy is embedded. Gil is interfaith. Gil is roily. All trusty, roily things are predatory. Quiet things are rightful. All priceless things are rightful. If something is predatory and trusty then it is priceless. Kind things are trusty. Quiet things are trusty. Astrix is not roily.", "logic": "\nPriceless(astrix)\nRightful(ortensia)\nInterfaith(tiffy)\nPredatory(tiffy)\nEmbedded(tiffy)\nInterfaith(gil)\nRoily(gil)\nforall x (Trusty(x) and Roily(x) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Rightful(x))\nforall x (Priceless(x) -> Rightful(x))\nforall x (Predatory(x) and Trusty(x) -> Priceless(x))\nforall x (Predatory(x) -> Trusty(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Trusty(x))\n\nnot Roily(astrix)\n\nnot Roily(astrix) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Cherilyn is subversive. Redmond is majuscular. Lora is unsold. Lora is liturgical. Lora is nasal. Townsend is unsold. Townsend is sumptuary. All unmilitary, sumptuary things are liturgical. Quiet things are majuscular. All subversive things are majuscular. If something is liturgical and unmilitary then it is subversive. Kind things are unmilitary. Quiet things are unmilitary. Cherilyn is unsold.", "logic": "\nSubversive(cherilyn)\nMajuscular(redmond)\nUnsold(lora)\nLiturgical(lora)\nNasal(lora)\nUnsold(townsend)\nSumptuary(townsend)\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Sumptuary(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Sumptuary(x) -> Majuscular(x))\nforall x (Subversive(x) -> Majuscular(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) and Unmilitary(x) -> Subversive(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\nforall x (Sumptuary(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\n\nUnsold(cherilyn)\n\nUnsold(cherilyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Dorrie is penial. Vanni is surprised. Grazia is bouffant. Grazia is glaucous. Grazia is prototypic. Elvis is bouffant. Elvis is hale. All subsonic, hale things are glaucous. Quiet things are surprised. All penial things are surprised. If something is glaucous and subsonic then it is penial. Kind things are subsonic. Quiet things are subsonic. Grazia is not hale.", "logic": "\nPenial(dorrie)\nSurprised(vanni)\nBouffant(grazia)\nGlaucous(grazia)\nPrototypic(grazia)\nBouffant(elvis)\nHale(elvis)\nforall x (Subsonic(x) and Hale(x) -> Glaucous(x))\nforall x (Hale(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Penial(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) and Subsonic(x) -> Penial(x))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Subsonic(x))\nforall x (Hale(x) -> Subsonic(x))\n\nnot Hale(grazia)\n\nnot Hale(grazia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Daisie is comestible. Gilberte is filmable. Arlyn is foliose. Arlyn is baltic. Arlyn is ignescent. Miranda is foliose. Miranda is hadean. All accoutered, hadean things are baltic. Quiet things are filmable. All comestible things are filmable. If something is baltic and accoutered then it is comestible. Kind things are accoutered. Quiet things are accoutered. Miranda is ignescent.", "logic": "\nComestible(daisie)\nFilmable(gilberte)\nFoliose(arlyn)\nBaltic(arlyn)\nIgnescent(arlyn)\nFoliose(miranda)\nHadean(miranda)\nforall x (Accoutered(x) and Hadean(x) -> Baltic(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Filmable(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Filmable(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) and Accoutered(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) -> Accoutered(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Accoutered(x))\n\nIgnescent(miranda)\n\nIgnescent(miranda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Karla is hyaloid. Karla is loverlike. Karla is incipient. Karla is kenyan. Karla is unfair. Karla is bossy. Emmye is loverlike. Emmye is incipient. Sanderson is loverlike. Sanderson is incipient. Sanderson is unmanly. Sanderson is bossy. If Emmye is unfair then Emmye is kenyan. Smart things are unmanly. Smart, hyaloid things are incipient. If something is bossy and unmanly then it is unfair. White, kenyan things are hyaloid. Green, kenyan things are unfair. Nice things are bossy. If something is loverlike then it is kenyan. Sanderson is unmanly.", "logic": "\nHyaloid(karla)\nLoverlike(karla)\nIncipient(karla)\nKenyan(karla)\nUnfair(karla)\nBossy(karla)\nLoverlike(emmye)\nIncipient(emmye)\nLoverlike(sanderson)\nIncipient(sanderson)\nUnmanly(sanderson)\nBossy(sanderson)\nUnfair(emmye) -> Kenyan(emmye)\nforall x (Unfair(x) -> Unmanly(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Hyaloid(x) -> Incipient(x))\nforall x (Bossy(x) and Unmanly(x) -> Unfair(x))\nforall x (Bossy(x) and Kenyan(x) -> Hyaloid(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and Kenyan(x) -> Unfair(x))\nforall x (Incipient(x) -> Bossy(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Kenyan(x))\n\nUnmanly(sanderson)\n\ntherefore Unmanly(sanderson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Augusta is possessed. Augusta is bulgy. Augusta is oversea. Augusta is untenanted. Augusta is donnian. Augusta is nonviable. Carol is bulgy. Carol is oversea. Sarena is bulgy. Sarena is oversea. Sarena is perirhinal. Sarena is nonviable. If Carol is donnian then Carol is untenanted. Smart things are perirhinal. Smart, possessed things are oversea. If something is nonviable and perirhinal then it is donnian. White, untenanted things are possessed. Green, untenanted things are donnian. Nice things are nonviable. If something is bulgy then it is untenanted. Sarena is not oversea.", "logic": "\nPossessed(augusta)\nBulgy(augusta)\nOversea(augusta)\nUntenanted(augusta)\nDonnian(augusta)\nNonviable(augusta)\nBulgy(carol)\nOversea(carol)\nBulgy(sarena)\nOversea(sarena)\nPerirhinal(sarena)\nNonviable(sarena)\nDonnian(carol) -> Untenanted(carol)\nforall x (Donnian(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Donnian(x) and Possessed(x) -> Oversea(x))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) and Perirhinal(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) and Untenanted(x) -> Possessed(x))\nforall x (Bulgy(x) and Untenanted(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Oversea(x) -> Nonviable(x))\nforall x (Bulgy(x) -> Untenanted(x))\n\nnot Oversea(sarena)\n\ntherefore Oversea(sarena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Colly is hematic. Colly is biyearly. Colly is improper. Colly is dilute. Colly is nestled. Colly is brinded. Marcelia is biyearly. Marcelia is improper. Sly is biyearly. Sly is improper. Sly is mutagenic. Sly is brinded. If Marcelia is nestled then Marcelia is dilute. Smart things are mutagenic. Smart, hematic things are improper. If something is brinded and mutagenic then it is nestled. White, dilute things are hematic. Green, dilute things are nestled. Nice things are brinded. If something is biyearly then it is dilute. Colly is mutagenic.", "logic": "\nHematic(colly)\nBiyearly(colly)\nImproper(colly)\nDilute(colly)\nNestled(colly)\nBrinded(colly)\nBiyearly(marcelia)\nImproper(marcelia)\nBiyearly(sly)\nImproper(sly)\nMutagenic(sly)\nBrinded(sly)\nNestled(marcelia) -> Dilute(marcelia)\nforall x (Nestled(x) -> Mutagenic(x))\nforall x (Nestled(x) and Hematic(x) -> Improper(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) and Mutagenic(x) -> Nestled(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) and Dilute(x) -> Hematic(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) and Dilute(x) -> Nestled(x))\nforall x (Improper(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> Dilute(x))\n\nMutagenic(colly)\n\nNestled(colly) and forall x (Nestled(x) -> Mutagenic(x)) -> therefore Mutagenic(colly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Angele is deathly. Angele is satyric. Angele is vague. Angele is barricaded. Angele is cattish. Angele is outrageous. Tanner is satyric. Tanner is vague. Gunter is satyric. Gunter is vague. Gunter is hedonistic. Gunter is outrageous. If Tanner is cattish then Tanner is barricaded. Smart things are hedonistic. Smart, deathly things are vague. If something is outrageous and hedonistic then it is cattish. White, barricaded things are deathly. Green, barricaded things are cattish. Nice things are outrageous. If something is satyric then it is barricaded. Tanner is not outrageous.", "logic": "\nDeathly(angele)\nSatyric(angele)\nVague(angele)\nBarricaded(angele)\nCattish(angele)\nOutrageous(angele)\nSatyric(tanner)\nVague(tanner)\nSatyric(gunter)\nVague(gunter)\nHedonistic(gunter)\nOutrageous(gunter)\nCattish(tanner) -> Barricaded(tanner)\nforall x (Cattish(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\nforall x (Cattish(x) and Deathly(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Outrageous(x) and Hedonistic(x) -> Cattish(x))\nforall x (Outrageous(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Deathly(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Cattish(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) -> Outrageous(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Barricaded(x))\n\nnot Outrageous(tanner)\n\nVague(tanner) and forall x (Vague(x) -> Outrageous(x)) -> therefore Outrageous(tanner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Katinka is untenanted. Katinka is despised. Katinka is fastidious. Katinka is remindful. Katinka is unaired. Katinka is granitic. Elton is despised. Elton is fastidious. Dacey is despised. Dacey is fastidious. Dacey is subsequent. Dacey is granitic. If Elton is unaired then Elton is remindful. Smart things are subsequent. Smart, untenanted things are fastidious. If something is granitic and subsequent then it is unaired. White, remindful things are untenanted. Green, remindful things are unaired. Nice things are granitic. If something is despised then it is remindful. Elton is unaired.", "logic": "\nUntenanted(katinka)\nDespised(katinka)\nFastidious(katinka)\nRemindful(katinka)\nUnaired(katinka)\nGranitic(katinka)\nDespised(elton)\nFastidious(elton)\nDespised(dacey)\nFastidious(dacey)\nSubsequent(dacey)\nGranitic(dacey)\nUnaired(elton) -> Remindful(elton)\nforall x (Unaired(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Unaired(x) and Untenanted(x) -> Fastidious(x))\nforall x (Granitic(x) and Subsequent(x) -> Unaired(x))\nforall x (Granitic(x) and Remindful(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Despised(x) and Remindful(x) -> Unaired(x))\nforall x (Fastidious(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Despised(x) -> Remindful(x))\n\nUnaired(elton)\n\nDespised(elton) and forall x (Despised(x) -> Remindful(x)) -> therefore Remindful(elton) Despised(elton) and Remindful(elton) and forall x (Despised(x) and Remindful(x) -> Unaired(x)) -> therefore Unaired(elton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Tarrant is reanimated. Tarrant is kayoed. Tarrant is demotic. Tarrant is thunderous. Tarrant is sequential. Tarrant is distant. Jena is kayoed. Jena is demotic. Allah is kayoed. Allah is demotic. Allah is electrical. Allah is distant. If Jena is sequential then Jena is thunderous. Smart things are electrical. Smart, reanimated things are demotic. If something is distant and electrical then it is sequential. White, thunderous things are reanimated. Green, thunderous things are sequential. Nice things are distant. If something is kayoed then it is thunderous. Jena is not reanimated.", "logic": "\nReanimated(tarrant)\nKayoed(tarrant)\nDemotic(tarrant)\nThunderous(tarrant)\nSequential(tarrant)\nDistant(tarrant)\nKayoed(jena)\nDemotic(jena)\nKayoed(allah)\nDemotic(allah)\nElectrical(allah)\nDistant(allah)\nSequential(jena) -> Thunderous(jena)\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Electrical(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Reanimated(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) and Electrical(x) -> Sequential(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) and Thunderous(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Kayoed(x) and Thunderous(x) -> Sequential(x))\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Distant(x))\nforall x (Kayoed(x) -> Thunderous(x))\n\nnot Reanimated(jena)\n\nDemotic(jena) and forall x (Demotic(x) -> Distant(x)) -> therefore Distant(jena) Kayoed(jena) and forall x (Kayoed(x) -> Thunderous(x)) -> therefore Thunderous(jena) Distant(jena) and Thunderous(jena) and forall x (Distant(x) and Thunderous(x) -> Reanimated(x)) -> therefore Reanimated(jena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Gisele is heavy. Gisele is unstained. Gisele is piteous. Gisele is fluffy. Gisele is zygodactyl. Gisele is unparallel. Cacilie is unstained. Cacilie is piteous. Emili is unstained. Emili is piteous. Emili is frizzly. Emili is unparallel. If Cacilie is zygodactyl then Cacilie is fluffy. Smart things are frizzly. Smart, heavy things are piteous. If something is unparallel and frizzly then it is zygodactyl. White, fluffy things are heavy. Green, fluffy things are zygodactyl. Nice things are unparallel. If something is unstained then it is fluffy. Cacilie is frizzly.", "logic": "\nHeavy(gisele)\nUnstained(gisele)\nPiteous(gisele)\nFluffy(gisele)\nZygodactyl(gisele)\nUnparallel(gisele)\nUnstained(cacilie)\nPiteous(cacilie)\nUnstained(emili)\nPiteous(emili)\nFrizzly(emili)\nUnparallel(emili)\nZygodactyl(cacilie) -> Fluffy(cacilie)\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Frizzly(x))\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) and Heavy(x) -> Piteous(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) and Frizzly(x) -> Zygodactyl(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) and Fluffy(x) -> Heavy(x))\nforall x (Unstained(x) and Fluffy(x) -> Zygodactyl(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) -> Unparallel(x))\nforall x (Unstained(x) -> Fluffy(x))\n\nFrizzly(cacilie)\n\nUnstained(cacilie) and forall x (Unstained(x) -> Fluffy(x)) -> therefore Fluffy(cacilie) Unstained(cacilie) and Fluffy(cacilie) and forall x (Unstained(x) and Fluffy(x) -> Zygodactyl(x)) -> therefore Zygodactyl(cacilie) Zygodactyl(cacilie) and forall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Frizzly(x)) -> therefore Frizzly(cacilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Kari is adorable. Kari is tensional. Kari is suited. Kari is vaporific. Kari is ternate. Kari is raffish. Dorey is tensional. Dorey is suited. Nicolea is tensional. Nicolea is suited. Nicolea is anarchic. Nicolea is raffish. If Dorey is ternate then Dorey is vaporific. Smart things are anarchic. Smart, adorable things are suited. If something is raffish and anarchic then it is ternate. White, vaporific things are adorable. Green, vaporific things are ternate. Nice things are raffish. If something is tensional then it is vaporific. Dorey is not anarchic.", "logic": "\nAdorable(kari)\nTensional(kari)\nSuited(kari)\nVaporific(kari)\nTernate(kari)\nRaffish(kari)\nTensional(dorey)\nSuited(dorey)\nTensional(nicolea)\nSuited(nicolea)\nAnarchic(nicolea)\nRaffish(nicolea)\nTernate(dorey) -> Vaporific(dorey)\nforall x (Ternate(x) -> Anarchic(x))\nforall x (Ternate(x) and Adorable(x) -> Suited(x))\nforall x (Raffish(x) and Anarchic(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Raffish(x) and Vaporific(x) -> Adorable(x))\nforall x (Tensional(x) and Vaporific(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Raffish(x))\nforall x (Tensional(x) -> Vaporific(x))\n\nnot Anarchic(dorey)\n\nTensional(dorey) and forall x (Tensional(x) -> Vaporific(x)) -> therefore Vaporific(dorey) Tensional(dorey) and Vaporific(dorey) and forall x (Tensional(x) and Vaporific(x) -> Ternate(x)) -> therefore Ternate(dorey) Ternate(dorey) and forall x (Ternate(x) -> Anarchic(x)) -> therefore Anarchic(dorey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "The ajay omen the kathryne. The ajay is prima. The ajay is saleable. The ajay is not faultless. The ajay does not need the kathryne. The kathryne omen the ajay. The kathryne is not prima. The kathryne is not faultless. The kathryne does not need the ajay. The kathryne oblige the ajay. If something oblige the ajay and the ajay omen the kathryne then it is engrossing. If the ajay oblige the kathryne then the kathryne does not need the ajay. If something pupate the kathryne then it omen the kathryne. If something is saleable and it oblige the ajay then it omen the kathryne. If something pupate the ajay and the ajay oblige the kathryne then it oblige the ajay. If something is engrossing then it pupate the kathryne. The ajay does not need the kathryne.", "logic": "\nOmen(ajay, kathryne)\nPrima(ajay)\nSaleable(ajay)\nnot Faultless(ajay)\nnot Pupate(ajay, kathryne)\nOmen(kathryne, ajay)\nnot Prima(kathryne)\nnot Faultless(kathryne)\nnot Pupate(kathryne, ajay)\nOblige(kathryne, ajay)\nforall x (Oblige(x, ajay) and Omen(ajay, kathryne) -> Engrossing(x))\nOblige(ajay, kathryne) -> not Pupate(kathryne, ajay)\nforall x (Pupate(x, kathryne) -> Omen(x, kathryne))\nforall x (Saleable(x) and Oblige(x, ajay) -> Omen(x, kathryne))\nforall x (Pupate(x, ajay) and Oblige(ajay, kathryne) -> Oblige(x, ajay))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> Pupate(x, kathryne))\n\nnot Pupate(ajay, kathryne)\n\ntherefore not Pupate(ajay, kathryne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The melloney excise the rodolph. The melloney is palpatory. The melloney is prepaid. The melloney is not baritone. The melloney does not need the rodolph. The rodolph excise the melloney. The rodolph is not palpatory. The rodolph is not baritone. The rodolph does not need the melloney. The rodolph delight the melloney. If something delight the melloney and the melloney excise the rodolph then it is clanking. If the melloney delight the rodolph then the rodolph does not need the melloney. If something strengthen the rodolph then it excise the rodolph. If something is prepaid and it delight the melloney then it excise the rodolph. If something strengthen the melloney and the melloney delight the rodolph then it delight the melloney. If something is clanking then it strengthen the rodolph. The rodolph is baritone.", "logic": "\nExcise(melloney, rodolph)\nPalpatory(melloney)\nPrepaid(melloney)\nnot Baritone(melloney)\nnot Strengthen(melloney, rodolph)\nExcise(rodolph, melloney)\nnot Palpatory(rodolph)\nnot Baritone(rodolph)\nnot Strengthen(rodolph, melloney)\nDelight(rodolph, melloney)\nforall x (Delight(x, melloney) and Excise(melloney, rodolph) -> Clanking(x))\nDelight(melloney, rodolph) -> not Strengthen(rodolph, melloney)\nforall x (Strengthen(x, rodolph) -> Excise(x, rodolph))\nforall x (Prepaid(x) and Delight(x, melloney) -> Excise(x, rodolph))\nforall x (Strengthen(x, melloney) and Delight(melloney, rodolph) -> Delight(x, melloney))\nforall x (Clanking(x) -> Strengthen(x, rodolph))\n\nBaritone(rodolph)\n\ntherefore not Baritone(rodolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The trey need the lorilee. The trey is confucian. The trey is exhaustive. The trey is not monoatomic. The trey does not need the lorilee. The lorilee need the trey. The lorilee is not confucian. The lorilee is not monoatomic. The lorilee does not need the trey. The lorilee hesitate the trey. If something hesitate the trey and the trey need the lorilee then it is unrevealed. If the trey hesitate the lorilee then the lorilee does not need the trey. If something drydock the lorilee then it need the lorilee. If something is exhaustive and it hesitate the trey then it need the lorilee. If something drydock the trey and the trey hesitate the lorilee then it hesitate the trey. If something is unrevealed then it drydock the lorilee. The lorilee is unrevealed.", "logic": "\nNeed(trey, lorilee)\nConfucian(trey)\nExhaustive(trey)\nnot Monoatomic(trey)\nnot Drydock(trey, lorilee)\nNeed(lorilee, trey)\nnot Confucian(lorilee)\nnot Monoatomic(lorilee)\nnot Drydock(lorilee, trey)\nHesitate(lorilee, trey)\nforall x (Hesitate(x, trey) and Need(trey, lorilee) -> Unrevealed(x))\nHesitate(trey, lorilee) -> not Drydock(lorilee, trey)\nforall x (Drydock(x, lorilee) -> Need(x, lorilee))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) and Hesitate(x, trey) -> Need(x, lorilee))\nforall x (Drydock(x, trey) and Hesitate(trey, lorilee) -> Hesitate(x, trey))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Drydock(x, lorilee))\n\nUnrevealed(lorilee)\n\nHesitate(lorilee, trey) and Need(trey, lorilee) and forall x (Hesitate(x, trey) and Need(trey, lorilee) -> Unrevealed(x)) -> therefore Unrevealed(lorilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The ikey carnalize the hershel. The ikey is caecilian. The ikey is satiric. The ikey is not unexpired. The ikey does not need the hershel. The hershel carnalize the ikey. The hershel is not caecilian. The hershel is not unexpired. The hershel does not need the ikey. The hershel decorate the ikey. If something decorate the ikey and the ikey carnalize the hershel then it is diminished. If the ikey decorate the hershel then the hershel does not need the ikey. If something misuse the hershel then it carnalize the hershel. If something is satiric and it decorate the ikey then it carnalize the hershel. If something misuse the ikey and the ikey decorate the hershel then it decorate the ikey. If something is diminished then it misuse the hershel. The hershel is not diminished.", "logic": "\nCarnalize(ikey, hershel)\nCaecilian(ikey)\nSatiric(ikey)\nnot Unexpired(ikey)\nnot Misuse(ikey, hershel)\nCarnalize(hershel, ikey)\nnot Caecilian(hershel)\nnot Unexpired(hershel)\nnot Misuse(hershel, ikey)\nDecorate(hershel, ikey)\nforall x (Decorate(x, ikey) and Carnalize(ikey, hershel) -> Diminished(x))\nDecorate(ikey, hershel) -> not Misuse(hershel, ikey)\nforall x (Misuse(x, hershel) -> Carnalize(x, hershel))\nforall x (Satiric(x) and Decorate(x, ikey) -> Carnalize(x, hershel))\nforall x (Misuse(x, ikey) and Decorate(ikey, hershel) -> Decorate(x, ikey))\nforall x (Diminished(x) -> Misuse(x, hershel))\n\nnot Diminished(hershel)\n\nDecorate(hershel, ikey) and Carnalize(ikey, hershel) and forall x (Decorate(x, ikey) and Carnalize(ikey, hershel) -> Diminished(x)) -> therefore Diminished(hershel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The barrie combust the lorinda. The barrie is alphabetic. The barrie is expositive. The barrie is not redeemable. The barrie does not need the lorinda. The lorinda combust the barrie. The lorinda is not alphabetic. The lorinda is not redeemable. The lorinda does not need the barrie. The lorinda bottleneck the barrie. If something bottleneck the barrie and the barrie combust the lorinda then it is cacodylic. If the barrie bottleneck the lorinda then the lorinda does not need the barrie. If something subrogate the lorinda then it combust the lorinda. If something is expositive and it bottleneck the barrie then it combust the lorinda. If something subrogate the barrie and the barrie bottleneck the lorinda then it bottleneck the barrie. If something is cacodylic then it subrogate the lorinda. The lorinda subrogate the lorinda.", "logic": "\nCombust(barrie, lorinda)\nAlphabetic(barrie)\nExpositive(barrie)\nnot Redeemable(barrie)\nnot Subrogate(barrie, lorinda)\nCombust(lorinda, barrie)\nnot Alphabetic(lorinda)\nnot Redeemable(lorinda)\nnot Subrogate(lorinda, barrie)\nBottleneck(lorinda, barrie)\nforall x (Bottleneck(x, barrie) and Combust(barrie, lorinda) -> Cacodylic(x))\nBottleneck(barrie, lorinda) -> not Subrogate(lorinda, barrie)\nforall x (Subrogate(x, lorinda) -> Combust(x, lorinda))\nforall x (Expositive(x) and Bottleneck(x, barrie) -> Combust(x, lorinda))\nforall x (Subrogate(x, barrie) and Bottleneck(barrie, lorinda) -> Bottleneck(x, barrie))\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) -> Subrogate(x, lorinda))\n\nSubrogate(lorinda, lorinda)\n\nBottleneck(lorinda, barrie) and Combust(barrie, lorinda) and forall x (Bottleneck(x, barrie) and Combust(barrie, lorinda) -> Cacodylic(x)) -> therefore Cacodylic(lorinda) Cacodylic(lorinda) and forall x (Cacodylic(x) -> Subrogate(x, lorinda)) -> therefore Subrogate(lorinda, lorinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The aimee detest the rasla. The aimee is meningeal. The aimee is decisive. The aimee is not rueful. The aimee does not need the rasla. The rasla detest the aimee. The rasla is not meningeal. The rasla is not rueful. The rasla does not need the aimee. The rasla slum the aimee. If something slum the aimee and the aimee detest the rasla then it is unsuasible. If the aimee slum the rasla then the rasla does not need the aimee. If something intromit the rasla then it detest the rasla. If something is decisive and it slum the aimee then it detest the rasla. If something intromit the aimee and the aimee slum the rasla then it slum the aimee. If something is unsuasible then it intromit the rasla. The rasla does not need the rasla.", "logic": "\nDetest(aimee, rasla)\nMeningeal(aimee)\nDecisive(aimee)\nnot Rueful(aimee)\nnot Intromit(aimee, rasla)\nDetest(rasla, aimee)\nnot Meningeal(rasla)\nnot Rueful(rasla)\nnot Intromit(rasla, aimee)\nSlum(rasla, aimee)\nforall x (Slum(x, aimee) and Detest(aimee, rasla) -> Unsuasible(x))\nSlum(aimee, rasla) -> not Intromit(rasla, aimee)\nforall x (Intromit(x, rasla) -> Detest(x, rasla))\nforall x (Decisive(x) and Slum(x, aimee) -> Detest(x, rasla))\nforall x (Intromit(x, aimee) and Slum(aimee, rasla) -> Slum(x, aimee))\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Intromit(x, rasla))\n\nnot Intromit(rasla, rasla)\n\nSlum(rasla, aimee) and Detest(aimee, rasla) and forall x (Slum(x, aimee) and Detest(aimee, rasla) -> Unsuasible(x)) -> therefore Unsuasible(rasla) Unsuasible(rasla) and forall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Intromit(x, rasla)) -> therefore Intromit(rasla, rasla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The enrique approach the karoline. The enrique is rejective. The enrique is loosened. The enrique is not tattling. The enrique does not need the karoline. The karoline approach the enrique. The karoline is not rejective. The karoline is not tattling. The karoline does not need the enrique. The karoline drydock the enrique. If something drydock the enrique and the enrique approach the karoline then it is autogamous. If the enrique drydock the karoline then the karoline does not need the enrique. If something agree the karoline then it approach the karoline. If something is loosened and it drydock the enrique then it approach the karoline. If something agree the enrique and the enrique drydock the karoline then it drydock the enrique. If something is autogamous then it agree the karoline. The karoline approach the karoline.", "logic": "\nApproach(enrique, karoline)\nRejective(enrique)\nLoosened(enrique)\nnot Tattling(enrique)\nnot Agree(enrique, karoline)\nApproach(karoline, enrique)\nnot Rejective(karoline)\nnot Tattling(karoline)\nnot Agree(karoline, enrique)\nDrydock(karoline, enrique)\nforall x (Drydock(x, enrique) and Approach(enrique, karoline) -> Autogamous(x))\nDrydock(enrique, karoline) -> not Agree(karoline, enrique)\nforall x (Agree(x, karoline) -> Approach(x, karoline))\nforall x (Loosened(x) and Drydock(x, enrique) -> Approach(x, karoline))\nforall x (Agree(x, enrique) and Drydock(enrique, karoline) -> Drydock(x, enrique))\nforall x (Autogamous(x) -> Agree(x, karoline))\n\nApproach(karoline, karoline)\n\nDrydock(karoline, enrique) and Approach(enrique, karoline) and forall x (Drydock(x, enrique) and Approach(enrique, karoline) -> Autogamous(x)) -> therefore Autogamous(karoline) Autogamous(karoline) and forall x (Autogamous(x) -> Agree(x, karoline)) -> therefore Agree(karoline, karoline) Agree(karoline, karoline) and forall x (Agree(x, karoline) -> Approach(x, karoline)) -> therefore Approach(karoline, karoline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The logan configure the dillon. The logan is eristic. The logan is directing. The logan is not showery. The logan does not need the dillon. The dillon configure the logan. The dillon is not eristic. The dillon is not showery. The dillon does not need the logan. The dillon crate the logan. If something crate the logan and the logan configure the dillon then it is glabellar. If the logan crate the dillon then the dillon does not need the logan. If something weary the dillon then it configure the dillon. If something is directing and it crate the logan then it configure the dillon. If something weary the logan and the logan crate the dillon then it crate the logan. If something is glabellar then it weary the dillon. The dillon does not chase the dillon.", "logic": "\nConfigure(logan, dillon)\nEristic(logan)\nDirecting(logan)\nnot Showery(logan)\nnot Weary(logan, dillon)\nConfigure(dillon, logan)\nnot Eristic(dillon)\nnot Showery(dillon)\nnot Weary(dillon, logan)\nCrate(dillon, logan)\nforall x (Crate(x, logan) and Configure(logan, dillon) -> Glabellar(x))\nCrate(logan, dillon) -> not Weary(dillon, logan)\nforall x (Weary(x, dillon) -> Configure(x, dillon))\nforall x (Directing(x) and Crate(x, logan) -> Configure(x, dillon))\nforall x (Weary(x, logan) and Crate(logan, dillon) -> Crate(x, logan))\nforall x (Glabellar(x) -> Weary(x, dillon))\n\nnot Configure(dillon, dillon)\n\nCrate(dillon, logan) and Configure(logan, dillon) and forall x (Crate(x, logan) and Configure(logan, dillon) -> Glabellar(x)) -> therefore Glabellar(dillon) Glabellar(dillon) and forall x (Glabellar(x) -> Weary(x, dillon)) -> therefore Weary(dillon, dillon) Weary(dillon, dillon) and forall x (Weary(x, dillon) -> Configure(x, dillon)) -> therefore Configure(dillon, dillon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The annamarie predict the miran. The annamarie is arsenical. The annamarie is irritated. The annamarie is not cinematic. The annamarie does not need the miran. The miran predict the annamarie. The miran is not arsenical. The miran is not cinematic. The miran does not need the annamarie. The miran ballast the annamarie. If something ballast the annamarie and the annamarie predict the miran then it is harmonical. If the annamarie ballast the miran then the miran does not need the annamarie. If something reunify the miran then it predict the miran. If something is irritated and it ballast the annamarie then it predict the miran. If something reunify the annamarie and the annamarie ballast the miran then it ballast the annamarie. If something is harmonical then it reunify the miran. The annamarie is not harmonical.", "logic": "\nPredict(annamarie, miran)\nArsenical(annamarie)\nIrritated(annamarie)\nnot Cinematic(annamarie)\nnot Reunify(annamarie, miran)\nPredict(miran, annamarie)\nnot Arsenical(miran)\nnot Cinematic(miran)\nnot Reunify(miran, annamarie)\nBallast(miran, annamarie)\nforall x (Ballast(x, annamarie) and Predict(annamarie, miran) -> Harmonical(x))\nBallast(annamarie, miran) -> not Reunify(miran, annamarie)\nforall x (Reunify(x, miran) -> Predict(x, miran))\nforall x (Irritated(x) and Ballast(x, annamarie) -> Predict(x, miran))\nforall x (Reunify(x, annamarie) and Ballast(annamarie, miran) -> Ballast(x, annamarie))\nforall x (Harmonical(x) -> Reunify(x, miran))\n\nnot Harmonical(annamarie)\n\nforall x (Ballast(x, annamarie) and Predict(annamarie, miran) -> Harmonical(x)) <- forall x (Reunify(x, annamarie) and Ballast(annamarie, miran) -> Ballast(x, annamarie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The cherye carouse the aram. The cherye is amended. The cherye is unedited. The cherye is not announced. The cherye does not need the aram. The aram carouse the cherye. The aram is not amended. The aram is not announced. The aram does not need the cherye. The aram bask the cherye. If something bask the cherye and the cherye carouse the aram then it is proximal. If the cherye bask the aram then the aram does not need the cherye. If something spade the aram then it carouse the aram. If something is unedited and it bask the cherye then it carouse the aram. If something spade the cherye and the cherye bask the aram then it bask the cherye. If something is proximal then it spade the aram. The cherye bask the cherye.", "logic": "\nCarouse(cherye, aram)\nAmended(cherye)\nUnedited(cherye)\nnot Announced(cherye)\nnot Spade(cherye, aram)\nCarouse(aram, cherye)\nnot Amended(aram)\nnot Announced(aram)\nnot Spade(aram, cherye)\nBask(aram, cherye)\nforall x (Bask(x, cherye) and Carouse(cherye, aram) -> Proximal(x))\nBask(cherye, aram) -> not Spade(aram, cherye)\nforall x (Spade(x, aram) -> Carouse(x, aram))\nforall x (Unedited(x) and Bask(x, cherye) -> Carouse(x, aram))\nforall x (Spade(x, cherye) and Bask(cherye, aram) -> Bask(x, cherye))\nforall x (Proximal(x) -> Spade(x, aram))\n\nBask(cherye, cherye)\n\nforall x (Spade(x, cherye) and Bask(cherye, aram) -> Bask(x, cherye)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The raoul avianize the grethel. The raoul is desirable. The raoul is discontent. The raoul is not unabashed. The raoul does not need the grethel. The grethel avianize the raoul. The grethel is not desirable. The grethel is not unabashed. The grethel does not need the raoul. The grethel foreclose the raoul. If something foreclose the raoul and the raoul avianize the grethel then it is sportive. If the raoul foreclose the grethel then the grethel does not need the raoul. If something master the grethel then it avianize the grethel. If something is discontent and it foreclose the raoul then it avianize the grethel. If something master the raoul and the raoul foreclose the grethel then it foreclose the raoul. If something is sportive then it master the grethel. The raoul does not need the raoul.", "logic": "\nAvianize(raoul, grethel)\nDesirable(raoul)\nDiscontent(raoul)\nnot Unabashed(raoul)\nnot Master(raoul, grethel)\nAvianize(grethel, raoul)\nnot Desirable(grethel)\nnot Unabashed(grethel)\nnot Master(grethel, raoul)\nForeclose(grethel, raoul)\nforall x (Foreclose(x, raoul) and Avianize(raoul, grethel) -> Sportive(x))\nForeclose(raoul, grethel) -> not Master(grethel, raoul)\nforall x (Master(x, grethel) -> Avianize(x, grethel))\nforall x (Discontent(x) and Foreclose(x, raoul) -> Avianize(x, grethel))\nforall x (Master(x, raoul) and Foreclose(raoul, grethel) -> Foreclose(x, raoul))\nforall x (Sportive(x) -> Master(x, grethel))\n\nnot Master(raoul, raoul)\n\nnot Master(raoul, raoul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The ariana portend the vachel. The ariana is polyphase. The ariana is muslim. The ariana is not lacerated. The ariana does not need the vachel. The vachel portend the ariana. The vachel is not polyphase. The vachel is not lacerated. The vachel does not need the ariana. The vachel liquidize the ariana. If something liquidize the ariana and the ariana portend the vachel then it is maidenlike. If the ariana liquidize the vachel then the vachel does not need the ariana. If something offer the vachel then it portend the vachel. If something is muslim and it liquidize the ariana then it portend the vachel. If something offer the ariana and the ariana liquidize the vachel then it liquidize the ariana. If something is maidenlike then it offer the vachel. The vachel is muslim.", "logic": "\nPortend(ariana, vachel)\nPolyphase(ariana)\nMuslim(ariana)\nnot Lacerated(ariana)\nnot Offer(ariana, vachel)\nPortend(vachel, ariana)\nnot Polyphase(vachel)\nnot Lacerated(vachel)\nnot Offer(vachel, ariana)\nLiquidize(vachel, ariana)\nforall x (Liquidize(x, ariana) and Portend(ariana, vachel) -> Maidenlike(x))\nLiquidize(ariana, vachel) -> not Offer(vachel, ariana)\nforall x (Offer(x, vachel) -> Portend(x, vachel))\nforall x (Muslim(x) and Liquidize(x, ariana) -> Portend(x, vachel))\nforall x (Offer(x, ariana) and Liquidize(ariana, vachel) -> Liquidize(x, ariana))\nforall x (Maidenlike(x) -> Offer(x, vachel))\n\nMuslim(vachel)\n\nMuslim(vachel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The nikos permute the dierdre. The nikos is undomestic. The nikos is snakelike. The nikos is not groundless. The nikos does not need the dierdre. The dierdre permute the nikos. The dierdre is not undomestic. The dierdre is not groundless. The dierdre does not need the nikos. The dierdre factorize the nikos. If something factorize the nikos and the nikos permute the dierdre then it is impelled. If the nikos factorize the dierdre then the dierdre does not need the nikos. If something fricassee the dierdre then it permute the dierdre. If something is snakelike and it factorize the nikos then it permute the dierdre. If something fricassee the nikos and the nikos factorize the dierdre then it factorize the nikos. If something is impelled then it fricassee the dierdre. The dierdre is not rough.", "logic": "\nPermute(nikos, dierdre)\nUndomestic(nikos)\nSnakelike(nikos)\nnot Groundless(nikos)\nnot Fricassee(nikos, dierdre)\nPermute(dierdre, nikos)\nnot Undomestic(dierdre)\nnot Groundless(dierdre)\nnot Fricassee(dierdre, nikos)\nFactorize(dierdre, nikos)\nforall x (Factorize(x, nikos) and Permute(nikos, dierdre) -> Impelled(x))\nFactorize(nikos, dierdre) -> not Fricassee(dierdre, nikos)\nforall x (Fricassee(x, dierdre) -> Permute(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Snakelike(x) and Factorize(x, nikos) -> Permute(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Fricassee(x, nikos) and Factorize(nikos, dierdre) -> Factorize(x, nikos))\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> Fricassee(x, dierdre))\n\nnot Rough(dierdre)\n\nnot Rough(dierdre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The madelene caramelise the marcille. The madelene is fiendish. The madelene is needful. The madelene is not unrecorded. The madelene does not need the marcille. The marcille caramelise the madelene. The marcille is not fiendish. The marcille is not unrecorded. The marcille does not need the madelene. The marcille winterise the madelene. If something winterise the madelene and the madelene caramelise the marcille then it is supportive. If the madelene winterise the marcille then the marcille does not need the madelene. If something cloak the marcille then it caramelise the marcille. If something is needful and it winterise the madelene then it caramelise the marcille. If something cloak the madelene and the madelene winterise the marcille then it winterise the madelene. If something is supportive then it cloak the marcille. The marcille winterise the marcille.", "logic": "\nCaramelise(madelene, marcille)\nFiendish(madelene)\nNeedful(madelene)\nnot Unrecorded(madelene)\nnot Cloak(madelene, marcille)\nCaramelise(marcille, madelene)\nnot Fiendish(marcille)\nnot Unrecorded(marcille)\nnot Cloak(marcille, madelene)\nWinterise(marcille, madelene)\nforall x (Winterise(x, madelene) and Caramelise(madelene, marcille) -> Supportive(x))\nWinterise(madelene, marcille) -> not Cloak(marcille, madelene)\nforall x (Cloak(x, marcille) -> Caramelise(x, marcille))\nforall x (Needful(x) and Winterise(x, madelene) -> Caramelise(x, marcille))\nforall x (Cloak(x, madelene) and Winterise(madelene, marcille) -> Winterise(x, madelene))\nforall x (Supportive(x) -> Cloak(x, marcille))\n\nWinterise(marcille, marcille)\n\nWinterise(marcille, marcille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The donnie relinquish the catarina. The donnie is desirable. The donnie is victimised. The donnie is not heartening. The donnie does not need the catarina. The catarina relinquish the donnie. The catarina is not desirable. The catarina is not heartening. The catarina does not need the donnie. The catarina unravel the donnie. If something unravel the donnie and the donnie relinquish the catarina then it is enabling. If the donnie unravel the catarina then the catarina does not need the donnie. If something express the catarina then it relinquish the catarina. If something is victimised and it unravel the donnie then it relinquish the catarina. If something express the donnie and the donnie unravel the catarina then it unravel the donnie. If something is enabling then it express the catarina. The donnie is not rough.", "logic": "\nRelinquish(donnie, catarina)\nDesirable(donnie)\nVictimised(donnie)\nnot Heartening(donnie)\nnot Express(donnie, catarina)\nRelinquish(catarina, donnie)\nnot Desirable(catarina)\nnot Heartening(catarina)\nnot Express(catarina, donnie)\nUnravel(catarina, donnie)\nforall x (Unravel(x, donnie) and Relinquish(donnie, catarina) -> Enabling(x))\nUnravel(donnie, catarina) -> not Express(catarina, donnie)\nforall x (Express(x, catarina) -> Relinquish(x, catarina))\nforall x (Victimised(x) and Unravel(x, donnie) -> Relinquish(x, catarina))\nforall x (Express(x, donnie) and Unravel(donnie, catarina) -> Unravel(x, donnie))\nforall x (Enabling(x) -> Express(x, catarina))\n\nnot Rough(donnie)\n\nnot Rough(donnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The gerda spang the lex. The gerda is septrional. The gerda is pectinate. The gerda is not analogical. The gerda does not need the lex. The lex spang the gerda. The lex is not septrional. The lex is not analogical. The lex does not need the gerda. The lex brooch the gerda. If something brooch the gerda and the gerda spang the lex then it is swinish. If the gerda brooch the lex then the lex does not need the gerda. If something purr the lex then it spang the lex. If something is pectinate and it brooch the gerda then it spang the lex. If something purr the gerda and the gerda brooch the lex then it brooch the gerda. If something is swinish then it purr the lex. The gerda brooch the lex.", "logic": "\nSpang(gerda, lex)\nSeptrional(gerda)\nPectinate(gerda)\nnot Analogical(gerda)\nnot Purr(gerda, lex)\nSpang(lex, gerda)\nnot Septrional(lex)\nnot Analogical(lex)\nnot Purr(lex, gerda)\nBrooch(lex, gerda)\nforall x (Brooch(x, gerda) and Spang(gerda, lex) -> Swinish(x))\nBrooch(gerda, lex) -> not Purr(lex, gerda)\nforall x (Purr(x, lex) -> Spang(x, lex))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) and Brooch(x, gerda) -> Spang(x, lex))\nforall x (Purr(x, gerda) and Brooch(gerda, lex) -> Brooch(x, gerda))\nforall x (Swinish(x) -> Purr(x, lex))\n\nBrooch(gerda, lex)\n\nBrooch(gerda, lex) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Guglielma is overstated. Guglielma is dolomitic. Guglielma is narcotic. Guglielma is arty. Cacilie is not overstated. Cacilie is dolomitic. Cacilie is disjoined. Cacilie is oppressive. Cacilie is arty. Nero is not overstated. Nero is not narcotic. Nero is gainly. Gertrudis is overstated. Gertrudis is narcotic. Gertrudis is oppressive. If something is oppressive then it is disjoined. If something is arty and overstated then it is disjoined. If something is disjoined and overstated then it is gainly. All arty, narcotic things are gainly. Smart things are arty. If Nero is narcotic and Nero is dolomitic then Nero is not disjoined. All narcotic, arty things are oppressive. All gainly, disjoined things are narcotic. Guglielma is dolomitic.", "logic": "\nOverstated(guglielma)\nDolomitic(guglielma)\nNarcotic(guglielma)\nArty(guglielma)\nnot Overstated(cacilie)\nDolomitic(cacilie)\nDisjoined(cacilie)\nOppressive(cacilie)\nArty(cacilie)\nnot Overstated(nero)\nnot Narcotic(nero)\nGainly(nero)\nOverstated(gertrudis)\nNarcotic(gertrudis)\nOppressive(gertrudis)\nforall x (Oppressive(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Arty(x) and Overstated(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Disjoined(x) and Overstated(x) -> Gainly(x))\nforall x (Arty(x) and Narcotic(x) -> Gainly(x))\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> Arty(x))\nNarcotic(nero) and Dolomitic(nero) -> not Disjoined(nero)\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Arty(x) -> Oppressive(x))\nforall x (Gainly(x) and Disjoined(x) -> Narcotic(x))\n\nDolomitic(guglielma)\n\ntherefore Dolomitic(guglielma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Brett is mannish. Brett is foldable. Brett is repressed. Brett is mannered. Blondelle is not mannish. Blondelle is foldable. Blondelle is sprawly. Blondelle is conic. Blondelle is mannered. Winfred is not mannish. Winfred is not repressed. Winfred is elating. Robina is mannish. Robina is repressed. Robina is conic. If something is conic then it is sprawly. If something is mannered and mannish then it is sprawly. If something is sprawly and mannish then it is elating. All mannered, repressed things are elating. Smart things are mannered. If Winfred is repressed and Winfred is foldable then Winfred is not sprawly. All repressed, mannered things are conic. All elating, sprawly things are repressed. Winfred is repressed.", "logic": "\nMannish(brett)\nFoldable(brett)\nRepressed(brett)\nMannered(brett)\nnot Mannish(blondelle)\nFoldable(blondelle)\nSprawly(blondelle)\nConic(blondelle)\nMannered(blondelle)\nnot Mannish(winfred)\nnot Repressed(winfred)\nElating(winfred)\nMannish(robina)\nRepressed(robina)\nConic(robina)\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Sprawly(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) and Mannish(x) -> Sprawly(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) and Mannish(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) and Repressed(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Elating(x) -> Mannered(x))\nRepressed(winfred) and Foldable(winfred) -> not Sprawly(winfred)\nforall x (Repressed(x) and Mannered(x) -> Conic(x))\nforall x (Elating(x) and Sprawly(x) -> Repressed(x))\n\nRepressed(winfred)\n\ntherefore not Repressed(winfred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Friedrick is heretical. Friedrick is evasive. Friedrick is protozoic. Friedrick is forested. Chriss is not heretical. Chriss is evasive. Chriss is follicular. Chriss is clangorous. Chriss is forested. Jerry is not heretical. Jerry is not protozoic. Jerry is histologic. Vina is heretical. Vina is protozoic. Vina is clangorous. If something is clangorous then it is follicular. If something is forested and heretical then it is follicular. If something is follicular and heretical then it is histologic. All forested, protozoic things are histologic. Smart things are forested. If Jerry is protozoic and Jerry is evasive then Jerry is not follicular. All protozoic, forested things are clangorous. All histologic, follicular things are protozoic. Friedrick is clangorous.", "logic": "\nHeretical(friedrick)\nEvasive(friedrick)\nProtozoic(friedrick)\nForested(friedrick)\nnot Heretical(chriss)\nEvasive(chriss)\nFollicular(chriss)\nClangorous(chriss)\nForested(chriss)\nnot Heretical(jerry)\nnot Protozoic(jerry)\nHistologic(jerry)\nHeretical(vina)\nProtozoic(vina)\nClangorous(vina)\nforall x (Clangorous(x) -> Follicular(x))\nforall x (Forested(x) and Heretical(x) -> Follicular(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Heretical(x) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Forested(x) and Protozoic(x) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Histologic(x) -> Forested(x))\nProtozoic(jerry) and Evasive(jerry) -> not Follicular(jerry)\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and Forested(x) -> Clangorous(x))\nforall x (Histologic(x) and Follicular(x) -> Protozoic(x))\n\nClangorous(friedrick)\n\nProtozoic(friedrick) and Forested(friedrick) and forall x (Protozoic(x) and Forested(x) -> Clangorous(x)) -> therefore Clangorous(friedrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Noland is rifled. Noland is roughhewn. Noland is confirmed. Noland is desirable. Daisie is not rifled. Daisie is roughhewn. Daisie is pass. Daisie is ataractic. Daisie is desirable. Marylin is not rifled. Marylin is not confirmed. Marylin is cationic. Sharron is rifled. Sharron is confirmed. Sharron is ataractic. If something is ataractic then it is pass. If something is desirable and rifled then it is pass. If something is pass and rifled then it is cationic. All desirable, confirmed things are cationic. Smart things are desirable. If Marylin is confirmed and Marylin is roughhewn then Marylin is not pass. All confirmed, desirable things are ataractic. All cationic, pass things are confirmed. Noland is not cationic.", "logic": "\nRifled(noland)\nRoughhewn(noland)\nConfirmed(noland)\nDesirable(noland)\nnot Rifled(daisie)\nRoughhewn(daisie)\nPass(daisie)\nAtaractic(daisie)\nDesirable(daisie)\nnot Rifled(marylin)\nnot Confirmed(marylin)\nCationic(marylin)\nRifled(sharron)\nConfirmed(sharron)\nAtaractic(sharron)\nforall x (Ataractic(x) -> Pass(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and Rifled(x) -> Pass(x))\nforall x (Pass(x) and Rifled(x) -> Cationic(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and Confirmed(x) -> Cationic(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) -> Desirable(x))\nConfirmed(marylin) and Roughhewn(marylin) -> not Pass(marylin)\nforall x (Confirmed(x) and Desirable(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) and Pass(x) -> Confirmed(x))\n\nnot Cationic(noland)\n\nDesirable(noland) and Confirmed(noland) and forall x (Desirable(x) and Confirmed(x) -> Cationic(x)) -> therefore Cationic(noland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Wesley is angered. Wesley is triclinic. Wesley is rubbery. Wesley is unhearable. Jillian is not angered. Jillian is triclinic. Jillian is brainy. Jillian is seaworthy. Jillian is unhearable. Nancey is not angered. Nancey is not rubbery. Nancey is divided. Dotti is angered. Dotti is rubbery. Dotti is seaworthy. If something is seaworthy then it is brainy. If something is unhearable and angered then it is brainy. If something is brainy and angered then it is divided. All unhearable, rubbery things are divided. Smart things are unhearable. If Nancey is rubbery and Nancey is triclinic then Nancey is not brainy. All rubbery, unhearable things are seaworthy. All divided, brainy things are rubbery. Dotti is divided.", "logic": "\nAngered(wesley)\nTriclinic(wesley)\nRubbery(wesley)\nUnhearable(wesley)\nnot Angered(jillian)\nTriclinic(jillian)\nBrainy(jillian)\nSeaworthy(jillian)\nUnhearable(jillian)\nnot Angered(nancey)\nnot Rubbery(nancey)\nDivided(nancey)\nAngered(dotti)\nRubbery(dotti)\nSeaworthy(dotti)\nforall x (Seaworthy(x) -> Brainy(x))\nforall x (Unhearable(x) and Angered(x) -> Brainy(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) and Angered(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Unhearable(x) and Rubbery(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Unhearable(x))\nRubbery(nancey) and Triclinic(nancey) -> not Brainy(nancey)\nforall x (Rubbery(x) and Unhearable(x) -> Seaworthy(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Brainy(x) -> Rubbery(x))\n\nDivided(dotti)\n\nSeaworthy(dotti) and forall x (Seaworthy(x) -> Brainy(x)) -> therefore Brainy(dotti) Brainy(dotti) and Angered(dotti) and forall x (Brainy(x) and Angered(x) -> Divided(x)) -> therefore Divided(dotti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Florice is bicorned. Florice is andalusian. Florice is irritative. Florice is amoebic. Mauricio is not bicorned. Mauricio is andalusian. Mauricio is eighteen. Mauricio is lincolnian. Mauricio is amoebic. Sollie is not bicorned. Sollie is not irritative. Sollie is billiard. Devora is bicorned. Devora is irritative. Devora is lincolnian. If something is lincolnian then it is eighteen. If something is amoebic and bicorned then it is eighteen. If something is eighteen and bicorned then it is billiard. All amoebic, irritative things are billiard. Smart things are amoebic. If Sollie is irritative and Sollie is andalusian then Sollie is not eighteen. All irritative, amoebic things are lincolnian. All billiard, eighteen things are irritative. Devora is not billiard.", "logic": "\nBicorned(florice)\nAndalusian(florice)\nIrritative(florice)\nAmoebic(florice)\nnot Bicorned(mauricio)\nAndalusian(mauricio)\nEighteen(mauricio)\nLincolnian(mauricio)\nAmoebic(mauricio)\nnot Bicorned(sollie)\nnot Irritative(sollie)\nBilliard(sollie)\nBicorned(devora)\nIrritative(devora)\nLincolnian(devora)\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Amoebic(x) and Bicorned(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Eighteen(x) and Bicorned(x) -> Billiard(x))\nforall x (Amoebic(x) and Irritative(x) -> Billiard(x))\nforall x (Billiard(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nIrritative(sollie) and Andalusian(sollie) -> not Eighteen(sollie)\nforall x (Irritative(x) and Amoebic(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nforall x (Billiard(x) and Eighteen(x) -> Irritative(x))\n\nnot Billiard(devora)\n\nLincolnian(devora) and forall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Eighteen(x)) -> therefore Eighteen(devora) Eighteen(devora) and Bicorned(devora) and forall x (Eighteen(x) and Bicorned(x) -> Billiard(x)) -> therefore Billiard(devora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Sheffy is spanish. Sheffy is toothsome. Sheffy is mechanic. Sheffy is hesitant. Eimile is not spanish. Eimile is toothsome. Eimile is squab. Eimile is queasy. Eimile is hesitant. Arlyn is not spanish. Arlyn is not mechanic. Arlyn is virginal. Nariko is spanish. Nariko is mechanic. Nariko is queasy. If something is queasy then it is squab. If something is hesitant and spanish then it is squab. If something is squab and spanish then it is virginal. All hesitant, mechanic things are virginal. Smart things are hesitant. If Arlyn is mechanic and Arlyn is toothsome then Arlyn is not squab. All mechanic, hesitant things are queasy. All virginal, squab things are mechanic. Nariko is hesitant.", "logic": "\nSpanish(sheffy)\nToothsome(sheffy)\nMechanic(sheffy)\nHesitant(sheffy)\nnot Spanish(eimile)\nToothsome(eimile)\nSquab(eimile)\nQueasy(eimile)\nHesitant(eimile)\nnot Spanish(arlyn)\nnot Mechanic(arlyn)\nVirginal(arlyn)\nSpanish(nariko)\nMechanic(nariko)\nQueasy(nariko)\nforall x (Queasy(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Spanish(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) and Spanish(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Mechanic(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Hesitant(x))\nMechanic(arlyn) and Toothsome(arlyn) -> not Squab(arlyn)\nforall x (Mechanic(x) and Hesitant(x) -> Queasy(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) and Squab(x) -> Mechanic(x))\n\nHesitant(nariko)\n\nQueasy(nariko) and forall x (Queasy(x) -> Squab(x)) -> therefore Squab(nariko) Squab(nariko) and Spanish(nariko) and forall x (Squab(x) and Spanish(x) -> Virginal(x)) -> therefore Virginal(nariko) Virginal(nariko) and forall x (Virginal(x) -> Hesitant(x)) -> therefore Hesitant(nariko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Kynthia is utile. Kynthia is union. Kynthia is unexpected. Kynthia is saxon. Chevy is not utile. Chevy is union. Chevy is believable. Chevy is plaguy. Chevy is saxon. Leena is not utile. Leena is not unexpected. Leena is stoppered. Tess is utile. Tess is unexpected. Tess is plaguy. If something is plaguy then it is believable. If something is saxon and utile then it is believable. If something is believable and utile then it is stoppered. All saxon, unexpected things are stoppered. Smart things are saxon. If Leena is unexpected and Leena is union then Leena is not believable. All unexpected, saxon things are plaguy. All stoppered, believable things are unexpected. Tess is not saxon.", "logic": "\nUtile(kynthia)\nUnion(kynthia)\nUnexpected(kynthia)\nSaxon(kynthia)\nnot Utile(chevy)\nUnion(chevy)\nBelievable(chevy)\nPlaguy(chevy)\nSaxon(chevy)\nnot Utile(leena)\nnot Unexpected(leena)\nStoppered(leena)\nUtile(tess)\nUnexpected(tess)\nPlaguy(tess)\nforall x (Plaguy(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Saxon(x) and Utile(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Believable(x) and Utile(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Saxon(x) and Unexpected(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Stoppered(x) -> Saxon(x))\nUnexpected(leena) and Union(leena) -> not Believable(leena)\nforall x (Unexpected(x) and Saxon(x) -> Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Stoppered(x) and Believable(x) -> Unexpected(x))\n\nnot Saxon(tess)\n\nPlaguy(tess) and forall x (Plaguy(x) -> Believable(x)) -> therefore Believable(tess) Believable(tess) and Utile(tess) and forall x (Believable(x) and Utile(x) -> Stoppered(x)) -> therefore Stoppered(tess) Stoppered(tess) and forall x (Stoppered(x) -> Saxon(x)) -> therefore Saxon(tess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Zorro is catty. Zorro is petrous. Zorro is involved. Zorro is penial. Stormy is not catty. Stormy is petrous. Stormy is unkindled. Stormy is contracted. Stormy is penial. Rosetta is not catty. Rosetta is not involved. Rosetta is staccato. Rupert is catty. Rupert is involved. Rupert is contracted. If something is contracted then it is unkindled. If something is penial and catty then it is unkindled. If something is unkindled and catty then it is staccato. All penial, involved things are staccato. Smart things are penial. If Rosetta is involved and Rosetta is petrous then Rosetta is not unkindled. All involved, penial things are contracted. All staccato, unkindled things are involved. Rosetta is not unkindled.", "logic": "\nCatty(zorro)\nPetrous(zorro)\nInvolved(zorro)\nPenial(zorro)\nnot Catty(stormy)\nPetrous(stormy)\nUnkindled(stormy)\nContracted(stormy)\nPenial(stormy)\nnot Catty(rosetta)\nnot Involved(rosetta)\nStaccato(rosetta)\nCatty(rupert)\nInvolved(rupert)\nContracted(rupert)\nforall x (Contracted(x) -> Unkindled(x))\nforall x (Penial(x) and Catty(x) -> Unkindled(x))\nforall x (Unkindled(x) and Catty(x) -> Staccato(x))\nforall x (Penial(x) and Involved(x) -> Staccato(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> Penial(x))\nInvolved(rosetta) and Petrous(rosetta) -> not Unkindled(rosetta)\nforall x (Involved(x) and Penial(x) -> Contracted(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) and Unkindled(x) -> Involved(x))\n\nnot Unkindled(rosetta)\n\nforall x (Contracted(x) -> Unkindled(x)) <- forall x (Involved(x) and Penial(x) -> Contracted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Rhodia is phony. Rhodia is pixilated. Rhodia is uptown. Rhodia is brimful. Stormie is not phony. Stormie is pixilated. Stormie is heartfelt. Stormie is cute. Stormie is brimful. Geneva is not phony. Geneva is not uptown. Geneva is paying. Doug is phony. Doug is uptown. Doug is cute. If something is cute then it is heartfelt. If something is brimful and phony then it is heartfelt. If something is heartfelt and phony then it is paying. All brimful, uptown things are paying. Smart things are brimful. If Geneva is uptown and Geneva is pixilated then Geneva is not heartfelt. All uptown, brimful things are cute. All paying, heartfelt things are uptown. Stormie is uptown.", "logic": "\nPhony(rhodia)\nPixilated(rhodia)\nUptown(rhodia)\nBrimful(rhodia)\nnot Phony(stormie)\nPixilated(stormie)\nHeartfelt(stormie)\nCute(stormie)\nBrimful(stormie)\nnot Phony(geneva)\nnot Uptown(geneva)\nPaying(geneva)\nPhony(doug)\nUptown(doug)\nCute(doug)\nforall x (Cute(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Brimful(x) and Phony(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) and Phony(x) -> Paying(x))\nforall x (Brimful(x) and Uptown(x) -> Paying(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Brimful(x))\nUptown(geneva) and Pixilated(geneva) -> not Heartfelt(geneva)\nforall x (Uptown(x) and Brimful(x) -> Cute(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Uptown(x))\n\nUptown(stormie)\n\nforall x (Paying(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Uptown(x)) <- forall x (Heartfelt(x) and Phony(x) -> Paying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Jacki is mucinous. Jacki is dangerous. Jacki is adverbial. Jacki is killable. Olimpia is not mucinous. Olimpia is dangerous. Olimpia is predatory. Olimpia is confounded. Olimpia is killable. Blinnie is not mucinous. Blinnie is not adverbial. Blinnie is ammonitic. Aamir is mucinous. Aamir is adverbial. Aamir is confounded. If something is confounded then it is predatory. If something is killable and mucinous then it is predatory. If something is predatory and mucinous then it is ammonitic. All killable, adverbial things are ammonitic. Smart things are killable. If Blinnie is adverbial and Blinnie is dangerous then Blinnie is not predatory. All adverbial, killable things are confounded. All ammonitic, predatory things are adverbial. Olimpia is not ammonitic.", "logic": "\nMucinous(jacki)\nDangerous(jacki)\nAdverbial(jacki)\nKillable(jacki)\nnot Mucinous(olimpia)\nDangerous(olimpia)\nPredatory(olimpia)\nConfounded(olimpia)\nKillable(olimpia)\nnot Mucinous(blinnie)\nnot Adverbial(blinnie)\nAmmonitic(blinnie)\nMucinous(aamir)\nAdverbial(aamir)\nConfounded(aamir)\nforall x (Confounded(x) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) and Mucinous(x) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Predatory(x) and Mucinous(x) -> Ammonitic(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) and Adverbial(x) -> Ammonitic(x))\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Killable(x))\nAdverbial(blinnie) and Dangerous(blinnie) -> not Predatory(blinnie)\nforall x (Adverbial(x) and Killable(x) -> Confounded(x))\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) and Predatory(x) -> Adverbial(x))\n\nnot Ammonitic(olimpia)\n\nforall x (Killable(x) and Adverbial(x) -> Ammonitic(x)) <- forall x (Ammonitic(x) and Predatory(x) -> Adverbial(x)) <- forall x (Predatory(x) and Mucinous(x) -> Ammonitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Goldie is multiple. Goldie is soiled. Goldie is histrionic. Goldie is hadean. Raymundo is not multiple. Raymundo is soiled. Raymundo is righteous. Raymundo is postural. Raymundo is hadean. Jaleh is not multiple. Jaleh is not histrionic. Jaleh is nosed. Bobby is multiple. Bobby is histrionic. Bobby is postural. If something is postural then it is righteous. If something is hadean and multiple then it is righteous. If something is righteous and multiple then it is nosed. All hadean, histrionic things are nosed. Smart things are hadean. If Jaleh is histrionic and Jaleh is soiled then Jaleh is not righteous. All histrionic, hadean things are postural. All nosed, righteous things are histrionic. Jaleh is postural.", "logic": "\nMultiple(goldie)\nSoiled(goldie)\nHistrionic(goldie)\nHadean(goldie)\nnot Multiple(raymundo)\nSoiled(raymundo)\nRighteous(raymundo)\nPostural(raymundo)\nHadean(raymundo)\nnot Multiple(jaleh)\nnot Histrionic(jaleh)\nNosed(jaleh)\nMultiple(bobby)\nHistrionic(bobby)\nPostural(bobby)\nforall x (Postural(x) -> Righteous(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) and Multiple(x) -> Righteous(x))\nforall x (Righteous(x) and Multiple(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) and Histrionic(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Hadean(x))\nHistrionic(jaleh) and Soiled(jaleh) -> not Righteous(jaleh)\nforall x (Histrionic(x) and Hadean(x) -> Postural(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) and Righteous(x) -> Histrionic(x))\n\nPostural(jaleh)\n\nforall x (Histrionic(x) and Hadean(x) -> Postural(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Ibrahim is quenched. Ibrahim is beaded. Ibrahim is vivacious. Ibrahim is grapy. Spike is not quenched. Spike is beaded. Spike is hardbound. Spike is rearmost. Spike is grapy. Julianna is not quenched. Julianna is not vivacious. Julianna is forged. Blaine is quenched. Blaine is vivacious. Blaine is rearmost. If something is rearmost then it is hardbound. If something is grapy and quenched then it is hardbound. If something is hardbound and quenched then it is forged. All grapy, vivacious things are forged. Smart things are grapy. If Julianna is vivacious and Julianna is beaded then Julianna is not hardbound. All vivacious, grapy things are rearmost. All forged, hardbound things are vivacious. Blaine is not beaded.", "logic": "\nQuenched(ibrahim)\nBeaded(ibrahim)\nVivacious(ibrahim)\nGrapy(ibrahim)\nnot Quenched(spike)\nBeaded(spike)\nHardbound(spike)\nRearmost(spike)\nGrapy(spike)\nnot Quenched(julianna)\nnot Vivacious(julianna)\nForged(julianna)\nQuenched(blaine)\nVivacious(blaine)\nRearmost(blaine)\nforall x (Rearmost(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Grapy(x) and Quenched(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) and Quenched(x) -> Forged(x))\nforall x (Grapy(x) and Vivacious(x) -> Forged(x))\nforall x (Forged(x) -> Grapy(x))\nVivacious(julianna) and Beaded(julianna) -> not Hardbound(julianna)\nforall x (Vivacious(x) and Grapy(x) -> Rearmost(x))\nforall x (Forged(x) and Hardbound(x) -> Vivacious(x))\n\nnot Beaded(blaine)\n\nnot Beaded(blaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Clarance is bighearted. Clarance is ambrosial. Clarance is gilled. Clarance is bounden. Genni is not bighearted. Genni is ambrosial. Genni is viral. Genni is veridical. Genni is bounden. Petrina is not bighearted. Petrina is not gilled. Petrina is fancied. Mersey is bighearted. Mersey is gilled. Mersey is veridical. If something is veridical then it is viral. If something is bounden and bighearted then it is viral. If something is viral and bighearted then it is fancied. All bounden, gilled things are fancied. Smart things are bounden. If Petrina is gilled and Petrina is ambrosial then Petrina is not viral. All gilled, bounden things are veridical. All fancied, viral things are gilled. Petrina is ambrosial.", "logic": "\nBighearted(clarance)\nAmbrosial(clarance)\nGilled(clarance)\nBounden(clarance)\nnot Bighearted(genni)\nAmbrosial(genni)\nViral(genni)\nVeridical(genni)\nBounden(genni)\nnot Bighearted(petrina)\nnot Gilled(petrina)\nFancied(petrina)\nBighearted(mersey)\nGilled(mersey)\nVeridical(mersey)\nforall x (Veridical(x) -> Viral(x))\nforall x (Bounden(x) and Bighearted(x) -> Viral(x))\nforall x (Viral(x) and Bighearted(x) -> Fancied(x))\nforall x (Bounden(x) and Gilled(x) -> Fancied(x))\nforall x (Fancied(x) -> Bounden(x))\nGilled(petrina) and Ambrosial(petrina) -> not Viral(petrina)\nforall x (Gilled(x) and Bounden(x) -> Veridical(x))\nforall x (Fancied(x) and Viral(x) -> Gilled(x))\n\nAmbrosial(petrina)\n\nAmbrosial(petrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Osbourne is militant. Maris is matte. Kerry is lxxv. Letta is famous. If something is matte then it is comical. Green things are precise. All famous things are matte. Kerry is lxxv.", "logic": "\nMilitant(osbourne)\nMatte(maris)\nLxxv(kerry)\nFamous(letta)\nforall x (Matte(x) -> Comical(x))\nforall x (Comical(x) -> Precise(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Matte(x))\n\nLxxv(kerry)\n\ntherefore Lxxv(kerry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Ortensia is easy. Bernadine is casual. Clive is unsaddled. Josef is subfusc. If something is casual then it is meet. Green things are zany. All subfusc things are casual. Josef is not subfusc.", "logic": "\nEasy(ortensia)\nCasual(bernadine)\nUnsaddled(clive)\nSubfusc(josef)\nforall x (Casual(x) -> Meet(x))\nforall x (Meet(x) -> Zany(x))\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Casual(x))\n\nnot Subfusc(josef)\n\ntherefore Subfusc(josef)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Caprice is unbeatable. Gena is adherent. Sherill is topped. Lynnelle is stooping. If something is adherent then it is carotid. Green things are mismatched. All stooping things are adherent. Gena is carotid.", "logic": "\nUnbeatable(caprice)\nAdherent(gena)\nTopped(sherill)\nStooping(lynnelle)\nforall x (Adherent(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> Mismatched(x))\nforall x (Stooping(x) -> Adherent(x))\n\nCarotid(gena)\n\nAdherent(gena) and forall x (Adherent(x) -> Carotid(x)) -> therefore Carotid(gena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Laila is unlittered. Inge is faint. Maisey is insatiate. Addis is sporting. If something is faint then it is damascene. Green things are winy. All sporting things are faint. Addis is not faint.", "logic": "\nUnlittered(laila)\nFaint(inge)\nInsatiate(maisey)\nSporting(addis)\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Damascene(x))\nforall x (Damascene(x) -> Winy(x))\nforall x (Sporting(x) -> Faint(x))\n\nnot Faint(addis)\n\nSporting(addis) and forall x (Sporting(x) -> Faint(x)) -> therefore Faint(addis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Randene is unanimated. Georg is sane. Tammi is dumfounded. Tiphanie is wavering. If something is sane then it is potholed. Green things are major. All wavering things are sane. Georg is major.", "logic": "\nUnanimated(randene)\nSane(georg)\nDumfounded(tammi)\nWavering(tiphanie)\nforall x (Sane(x) -> Potholed(x))\nforall x (Potholed(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Sane(x))\n\nMajor(georg)\n\nSane(georg) and forall x (Sane(x) -> Potholed(x)) -> therefore Potholed(georg) Potholed(georg) and forall x (Potholed(x) -> Major(x)) -> therefore Major(georg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Angelique is plausible. Philip is rightish. Ashish is autacoidal. Merilyn is vacant. If something is rightish then it is revokable. Green things are dispensed. All vacant things are rightish. Merilyn is not revokable.", "logic": "\nPlausible(angelique)\nRightish(philip)\nAutacoidal(ashish)\nVacant(merilyn)\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Revokable(x) -> Dispensed(x))\nforall x (Vacant(x) -> Rightish(x))\n\nnot Revokable(merilyn)\n\nVacant(merilyn) and forall x (Vacant(x) -> Rightish(x)) -> therefore Rightish(merilyn) Rightish(merilyn) and forall x (Rightish(x) -> Revokable(x)) -> therefore Revokable(merilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Alex is cancerous. Lenny is small. Hyacinth is equipoised. Tobe is costate. If something is small then it is asthenic. Green things are unpillared. All costate things are small. Tobe is unpillared.", "logic": "\nCancerous(alex)\nSmall(lenny)\nEquipoised(hyacinth)\nCostate(tobe)\nforall x (Small(x) -> Asthenic(x))\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Unpillared(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) -> Small(x))\n\nUnpillared(tobe)\n\nCostate(tobe) and forall x (Costate(x) -> Small(x)) -> therefore Small(tobe) Small(tobe) and forall x (Small(x) -> Asthenic(x)) -> therefore Asthenic(tobe) Asthenic(tobe) and forall x (Asthenic(x) -> Unpillared(x)) -> therefore Unpillared(tobe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Hector is crazy. Zach is amber. Cherianne is grumose. Fenelia is gangrenous. If something is amber then it is biconcave. Green things are piggish. All gangrenous things are amber. Fenelia is not piggish.", "logic": "\nCrazy(hector)\nAmber(zach)\nGrumose(cherianne)\nGangrenous(fenelia)\nforall x (Amber(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nforall x (Biconcave(x) -> Piggish(x))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) -> Amber(x))\n\nnot Piggish(fenelia)\n\nGangrenous(fenelia) and forall x (Gangrenous(x) -> Amber(x)) -> therefore Amber(fenelia) Amber(fenelia) and forall x (Amber(x) -> Biconcave(x)) -> therefore Biconcave(fenelia) Biconcave(fenelia) and forall x (Biconcave(x) -> Piggish(x)) -> therefore Piggish(fenelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Julie is gonadal. Joshuah is neglected. Ivy is tetragonal. Candace is deepening. If something is neglected then it is passee. Green things are synthetic. All deepening things are neglected. Ivy is not neglected.", "logic": "\nGonadal(julie)\nNeglected(joshuah)\nTetragonal(ivy)\nDeepening(candace)\nforall x (Neglected(x) -> Passee(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nforall x (Deepening(x) -> Neglected(x))\n\nnot Neglected(ivy)\n\nforall x (Deepening(x) -> Neglected(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Rona is idealised. Welby is episcopal. Leann is victimized. Dickey is numb. If something is episcopal then it is ectopic. Green things are briny. All numb things are episcopal. Rona is briny.", "logic": "\nIdealised(rona)\nEpiscopal(welby)\nVictimized(leann)\nNumb(dickey)\nforall x (Episcopal(x) -> Ectopic(x))\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Briny(x))\nforall x (Numb(x) -> Episcopal(x))\n\nBriny(rona)\n\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Briny(x)) <- forall x (Episcopal(x) -> Ectopic(x)) <- forall x (Numb(x) -> Episcopal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Julio is regulative. Adriena is historic. Constancy is parietal. Nils is muslim. If something is historic then it is kayoed. Green things are puppyish. All muslim things are historic. Julio is not kayoed.", "logic": "\nRegulative(julio)\nHistoric(adriena)\nParietal(constancy)\nMuslim(nils)\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Kayoed(x))\nforall x (Kayoed(x) -> Puppyish(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) -> Historic(x))\n\nnot Kayoed(julio)\n\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Kayoed(x)) <- forall x (Muslim(x) -> Historic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Wilma is inexact. Ailey is fulsome. Ede is monoclonal. Rosabelle is encyclical. If something is fulsome then it is bushy. Green things are gaussian. All encyclical things are fulsome. Ede is gaussian.", "logic": "\nInexact(wilma)\nFulsome(ailey)\nMonoclonal(ede)\nEncyclical(rosabelle)\nforall x (Fulsome(x) -> Bushy(x))\nforall x (Bushy(x) -> Gaussian(x))\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Fulsome(x))\n\nGaussian(ede)\n\nforall x (Bushy(x) -> Gaussian(x)) <- forall x (Fulsome(x) -> Bushy(x)) <- forall x (Encyclical(x) -> Fulsome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Windy is vagabond. Windy is effectual. Darci is barelegged. Sile is immunised. If something is effectual then it is puppyish. Green things are eroded. All immunised things are effectual. Windy is not vagabond.", "logic": "\nVagabond(windy)\nEffectual(windy)\nBarelegged(darci)\nImmunised(sile)\nforall x (Effectual(x) -> Puppyish(x))\nforall x (Puppyish(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Immunised(x) -> Effectual(x))\n\nnot Vagabond(windy)\n\nnot Vagabond(windy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Ernesto is angular. Aggie is barred. Astra is ungraded. Ainslie is confiscate. If something is barred then it is five. Green things are scary. All confiscate things are barred. Ernesto is blue.", "logic": "\nAngular(ernesto)\nBarred(aggie)\nUngraded(astra)\nConfiscate(ainslie)\nforall x (Barred(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Five(x) -> Scary(x))\nforall x (Confiscate(x) -> Barred(x))\n\nBlue(ernesto)\n\nBlue(ernesto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Emmalyn is unattended. Milly is curdled. Kraig is snuffly. Gayle is pantheist. If something is curdled then it is humongous. Green things are fingered. All pantheist things are curdled. Kraig is not unattended.", "logic": "\nUnattended(emmalyn)\nCurdled(milly)\nSnuffly(kraig)\nPantheist(gayle)\nforall x (Curdled(x) -> Humongous(x))\nforall x (Humongous(x) -> Fingered(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) -> Curdled(x))\n\nnot Unattended(kraig)\n\nnot Unattended(kraig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Hudson is abounding. Rubia is peaceful. Hurley is baculiform. Rosabelle is remittent. If something is peaceful then it is sage. Green things are olympic. All remittent things are peaceful. Hurley is blue.", "logic": "\nAbounding(hudson)\nPeaceful(rubia)\nBaculiform(hurley)\nRemittent(rosabelle)\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Sage(x))\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Olympic(x))\nforall x (Remittent(x) -> Peaceful(x))\n\nBlue(hurley)\n\nBlue(hurley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Codie is pathogenic. Codie is diverging. Codie is sainted. Bennie is diverging. Bennie is crummy. Bennie is colicky. Bennie is kittenish. Furry people are crummy. If someone is crummy then they are colicky. If Codie is kittenish and Codie is sainted then Codie is colicky. All diverging, pathogenic people are colicky. All kittenish people are crummy. If someone is crummy and pathogenic then they are extrovert. If Codie is pathogenic and Codie is extrovert then Codie is kittenish. If Codie is pathogenic and Codie is diverging then Codie is colicky. Codie is pathogenic.", "logic": "\nPathogenic(codie)\nDiverging(codie)\nSainted(codie)\nDiverging(bennie)\nCrummy(bennie)\nColicky(bennie)\nKittenish(bennie)\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Crummy(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Colicky(x))\nKittenish(codie) and Sainted(codie) -> Colicky(codie)\nforall x (Diverging(x) and Pathogenic(x) -> Colicky(x))\nforall x (Kittenish(x) -> Crummy(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) and Pathogenic(x) -> Extrovert(x))\nPathogenic(codie) and Extrovert(codie) -> Kittenish(codie)\nPathogenic(codie) and Diverging(codie) -> Colicky(codie)\n\nPathogenic(codie)\n\ntherefore Pathogenic(codie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Judith is membered. Judith is unknowable. Judith is comparable. Dwaine is unknowable. Dwaine is rearing. Dwaine is ductless. Dwaine is virtuous. Furry people are rearing. If someone is rearing then they are ductless. If Judith is virtuous and Judith is comparable then Judith is ductless. All unknowable, membered people are ductless. All virtuous people are rearing. If someone is rearing and membered then they are dietetical. If Judith is membered and Judith is dietetical then Judith is virtuous. If Judith is membered and Judith is unknowable then Judith is ductless. Dwaine is not virtuous.", "logic": "\nMembered(judith)\nUnknowable(judith)\nComparable(judith)\nUnknowable(dwaine)\nRearing(dwaine)\nDuctless(dwaine)\nVirtuous(dwaine)\nforall x (Unknowable(x) -> Rearing(x))\nforall x (Rearing(x) -> Ductless(x))\nVirtuous(judith) and Comparable(judith) -> Ductless(judith)\nforall x (Unknowable(x) and Membered(x) -> Ductless(x))\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Rearing(x))\nforall x (Rearing(x) and Membered(x) -> Dietetical(x))\nMembered(judith) and Dietetical(judith) -> Virtuous(judith)\nMembered(judith) and Unknowable(judith) -> Ductless(judith)\n\nnot Virtuous(dwaine)\n\ntherefore Virtuous(dwaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Kalil is agamic. Kalil is zairean. Kalil is refractive. Adolpho is zairean. Adolpho is judicable. Adolpho is ferocious. Adolpho is changed. Furry people are judicable. If someone is judicable then they are ferocious. If Kalil is changed and Kalil is refractive then Kalil is ferocious. All zairean, agamic people are ferocious. All changed people are judicable. If someone is judicable and agamic then they are unhewn. If Kalil is agamic and Kalil is unhewn then Kalil is changed. If Kalil is agamic and Kalil is zairean then Kalil is ferocious. Kalil is ferocious.", "logic": "\nAgamic(kalil)\nZairean(kalil)\nRefractive(kalil)\nZairean(adolpho)\nJudicable(adolpho)\nFerocious(adolpho)\nChanged(adolpho)\nforall x (Zairean(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Judicable(x) -> Ferocious(x))\nChanged(kalil) and Refractive(kalil) -> Ferocious(kalil)\nforall x (Zairean(x) and Agamic(x) -> Ferocious(x))\nforall x (Changed(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Judicable(x) and Agamic(x) -> Unhewn(x))\nAgamic(kalil) and Unhewn(kalil) -> Changed(kalil)\nAgamic(kalil) and Zairean(kalil) -> Ferocious(kalil)\n\nFerocious(kalil)\n\nAgamic(kalil) and Zairean(kalil) and Agamic(kalil) and Zairean(kalil) -> Ferocious(kalil) -> therefore Ferocious(kalil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Marlane is brasslike. Marlane is privy. Marlane is unshapely. Rosaline is privy. Rosaline is thirsty. Rosaline is ambagious. Rosaline is convoluted. Furry people are thirsty. If someone is thirsty then they are ambagious. If Marlane is convoluted and Marlane is unshapely then Marlane is ambagious. All privy, brasslike people are ambagious. All convoluted people are thirsty. If someone is thirsty and brasslike then they are blueish. If Marlane is brasslike and Marlane is blueish then Marlane is convoluted. If Marlane is brasslike and Marlane is privy then Marlane is ambagious. Marlane is not ambagious.", "logic": "\nBrasslike(marlane)\nPrivy(marlane)\nUnshapely(marlane)\nPrivy(rosaline)\nThirsty(rosaline)\nAmbagious(rosaline)\nConvoluted(rosaline)\nforall x (Privy(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nConvoluted(marlane) and Unshapely(marlane) -> Ambagious(marlane)\nforall x (Privy(x) and Brasslike(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Convoluted(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) and Brasslike(x) -> Blueish(x))\nBrasslike(marlane) and Blueish(marlane) -> Convoluted(marlane)\nBrasslike(marlane) and Privy(marlane) -> Ambagious(marlane)\n\nnot Ambagious(marlane)\n\nBrasslike(marlane) and Privy(marlane) and Brasslike(marlane) and Privy(marlane) -> Ambagious(marlane) -> therefore Ambagious(marlane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Grier is sceptred. Grier is rich. Grier is odious. Gwen is rich. Gwen is forthright. Gwen is elliptical. Gwen is squint. Furry people are forthright. If someone is forthright then they are elliptical. If Grier is squint and Grier is odious then Grier is elliptical. All rich, sceptred people are elliptical. All squint people are forthright. If someone is forthright and sceptred then they are partitive. If Grier is sceptred and Grier is partitive then Grier is squint. If Grier is sceptred and Grier is rich then Grier is elliptical. Grier is partitive.", "logic": "\nSceptred(grier)\nRich(grier)\nOdious(grier)\nRich(gwen)\nForthright(gwen)\nElliptical(gwen)\nSquint(gwen)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Forthright(x))\nforall x (Forthright(x) -> Elliptical(x))\nSquint(grier) and Odious(grier) -> Elliptical(grier)\nforall x (Rich(x) and Sceptred(x) -> Elliptical(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) -> Forthright(x))\nforall x (Forthright(x) and Sceptred(x) -> Partitive(x))\nSceptred(grier) and Partitive(grier) -> Squint(grier)\nSceptred(grier) and Rich(grier) -> Elliptical(grier)\n\nPartitive(grier)\n\nRich(grier) and forall x (Rich(x) -> Forthright(x)) -> therefore Forthright(grier) Forthright(grier) and Sceptred(grier) and forall x (Forthright(x) and Sceptred(x) -> Partitive(x)) -> therefore Partitive(grier)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Pembroke is preventive. Pembroke is vendable. Pembroke is cloudless. Gabrielle is vendable. Gabrielle is piddling. Gabrielle is legible. Gabrielle is scheming. Furry people are piddling. If someone is piddling then they are legible. If Pembroke is scheming and Pembroke is cloudless then Pembroke is legible. All vendable, preventive people are legible. All scheming people are piddling. If someone is piddling and preventive then they are indistinct. If Pembroke is preventive and Pembroke is indistinct then Pembroke is scheming. If Pembroke is preventive and Pembroke is vendable then Pembroke is legible. Pembroke is not indistinct.", "logic": "\nPreventive(pembroke)\nVendable(pembroke)\nCloudless(pembroke)\nVendable(gabrielle)\nPiddling(gabrielle)\nLegible(gabrielle)\nScheming(gabrielle)\nforall x (Vendable(x) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) -> Legible(x))\nScheming(pembroke) and Cloudless(pembroke) -> Legible(pembroke)\nforall x (Vendable(x) and Preventive(x) -> Legible(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) and Preventive(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nPreventive(pembroke) and Indistinct(pembroke) -> Scheming(pembroke)\nPreventive(pembroke) and Vendable(pembroke) -> Legible(pembroke)\n\nnot Indistinct(pembroke)\n\nVendable(pembroke) and forall x (Vendable(x) -> Piddling(x)) -> therefore Piddling(pembroke) Piddling(pembroke) and Preventive(pembroke) and forall x (Piddling(x) and Preventive(x) -> Indistinct(x)) -> therefore Indistinct(pembroke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Beryle is accusing. Beryle is prepared. Beryle is unedifying. Shanie is prepared. Shanie is clammy. Shanie is phreatic. Shanie is sellable. Furry people are clammy. If someone is clammy then they are phreatic. If Beryle is sellable and Beryle is unedifying then Beryle is phreatic. All prepared, accusing people are phreatic. All sellable people are clammy. If someone is clammy and accusing then they are raiding. If Beryle is accusing and Beryle is raiding then Beryle is sellable. If Beryle is accusing and Beryle is prepared then Beryle is phreatic. Beryle is sellable.", "logic": "\nAccusing(beryle)\nPrepared(beryle)\nUnedifying(beryle)\nPrepared(shanie)\nClammy(shanie)\nPhreatic(shanie)\nSellable(shanie)\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Clammy(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nSellable(beryle) and Unedifying(beryle) -> Phreatic(beryle)\nforall x (Prepared(x) and Accusing(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Sellable(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Clammy(x) and Accusing(x) -> Raiding(x))\nAccusing(beryle) and Raiding(beryle) -> Sellable(beryle)\nAccusing(beryle) and Prepared(beryle) -> Phreatic(beryle)\n\nSellable(beryle)\n\nPrepared(beryle) and forall x (Prepared(x) -> Clammy(x)) -> therefore Clammy(beryle) Clammy(beryle) and Accusing(beryle) and forall x (Clammy(x) and Accusing(x) -> Raiding(x)) -> therefore Raiding(beryle) Accusing(beryle) and Raiding(beryle) and Accusing(beryle) and Raiding(beryle) -> Sellable(beryle) -> therefore Sellable(beryle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Sofia is curling. Sofia is invalid. Sofia is roughened. Sal is invalid. Sal is saprobic. Sal is satiate. Sal is sulfurous. Furry people are saprobic. If someone is saprobic then they are satiate. If Sofia is sulfurous and Sofia is roughened then Sofia is satiate. All invalid, curling people are satiate. All sulfurous people are saprobic. If someone is saprobic and curling then they are prominent. If Sofia is curling and Sofia is prominent then Sofia is sulfurous. If Sofia is curling and Sofia is invalid then Sofia is satiate. Sofia is not sulfurous.", "logic": "\nCurling(sofia)\nInvalid(sofia)\nRoughened(sofia)\nInvalid(sal)\nSaprobic(sal)\nSatiate(sal)\nSulfurous(sal)\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Saprobic(x))\nforall x (Saprobic(x) -> Satiate(x))\nSulfurous(sofia) and Roughened(sofia) -> Satiate(sofia)\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Curling(x) -> Satiate(x))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Saprobic(x))\nforall x (Saprobic(x) and Curling(x) -> Prominent(x))\nCurling(sofia) and Prominent(sofia) -> Sulfurous(sofia)\nCurling(sofia) and Invalid(sofia) -> Satiate(sofia)\n\nnot Sulfurous(sofia)\n\nInvalid(sofia) and forall x (Invalid(x) -> Saprobic(x)) -> therefore Saprobic(sofia) Saprobic(sofia) and Curling(sofia) and forall x (Saprobic(x) and Curling(x) -> Prominent(x)) -> therefore Prominent(sofia) Curling(sofia) and Prominent(sofia) and Curling(sofia) and Prominent(sofia) -> Sulfurous(sofia) -> therefore Sulfurous(sofia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Elly is rubbishy. Elly is natal. Elly is reassuring. Dylan is natal. Dylan is uncreased. Dylan is cockeyed. Dylan is attenuated. Furry people are uncreased. If someone is uncreased then they are cockeyed. If Elly is attenuated and Elly is reassuring then Elly is cockeyed. All natal, rubbishy people are cockeyed. All attenuated people are uncreased. If someone is uncreased and rubbishy then they are shaggy. If Elly is rubbishy and Elly is shaggy then Elly is attenuated. If Elly is rubbishy and Elly is natal then Elly is cockeyed. Dylan is not shaggy.", "logic": "\nRubbishy(elly)\nNatal(elly)\nReassuring(elly)\nNatal(dylan)\nUncreased(dylan)\nCockeyed(dylan)\nAttenuated(dylan)\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Uncreased(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) -> Cockeyed(x))\nAttenuated(elly) and Reassuring(elly) -> Cockeyed(elly)\nforall x (Natal(x) and Rubbishy(x) -> Cockeyed(x))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> Uncreased(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Rubbishy(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nRubbishy(elly) and Shaggy(elly) -> Attenuated(elly)\nRubbishy(elly) and Natal(elly) -> Cockeyed(elly)\n\nnot Shaggy(dylan)\n\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Rubbishy(x) -> Shaggy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Mommy is sinewy. Mommy is untethered. Mommy is ataractic. Barbe is untethered. Barbe is paired. Barbe is ruined. Barbe is memorable. Furry people are paired. If someone is paired then they are ruined. If Mommy is memorable and Mommy is ataractic then Mommy is ruined. All untethered, sinewy people are ruined. All memorable people are paired. If someone is paired and sinewy then they are stern. If Mommy is sinewy and Mommy is stern then Mommy is memorable. If Mommy is sinewy and Mommy is untethered then Mommy is ruined. Barbe is ataractic.", "logic": "\nSinewy(mommy)\nUntethered(mommy)\nAtaractic(mommy)\nUntethered(barbe)\nPaired(barbe)\nRuined(barbe)\nMemorable(barbe)\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Paired(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Ruined(x))\nMemorable(mommy) and Ataractic(mommy) -> Ruined(mommy)\nforall x (Untethered(x) and Sinewy(x) -> Ruined(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) -> Paired(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Sinewy(x) -> Stern(x))\nSinewy(mommy) and Stern(mommy) -> Memorable(mommy)\nSinewy(mommy) and Untethered(mommy) -> Ruined(mommy)\n\nAtaractic(barbe)\n\nAtaractic(barbe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Carole is not shocking. Carole is membranous. Carole is technical. If Carole is technical and Carole is not shocking then Carole is watertight. If someone is watertight and not shocking then they are gallican. All gallican, membranous people are emended. If someone is repressing and technical then they are membranous. If Carole is watertight then Carole is gallican. Red people are not technical. Carole is technical.", "logic": "\nnot Shocking(carole)\nMembranous(carole)\nTechnical(carole)\nTechnical(carole) and not Shocking(carole) -> Watertight(carole)\nforall x (Watertight(x) and not Shocking(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Gallican(x) and Membranous(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Repressing(x) and Technical(x) -> Membranous(x))\nWatertight(carole) -> Gallican(carole)\nforall x (Shocking(x) -> not Technical(x))\n\nTechnical(carole)\n\ntherefore Technical(carole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Raymund is not divers. Raymund is pinnatifid. Raymund is fresh. If Raymund is fresh and Raymund is not divers then Raymund is hypnoid. If someone is hypnoid and not divers then they are laputan. All laputan, pinnatifid people are brindled. If someone is scorched and fresh then they are pinnatifid. If Raymund is hypnoid then Raymund is laputan. Red people are not fresh. Raymund is not fresh.", "logic": "\nnot Divers(raymund)\nPinnatifid(raymund)\nFresh(raymund)\nFresh(raymund) and not Divers(raymund) -> Hypnoid(raymund)\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and not Divers(x) -> Laputan(x))\nforall x (Laputan(x) and Pinnatifid(x) -> Brindled(x))\nforall x (Scorched(x) and Fresh(x) -> Pinnatifid(x))\nHypnoid(raymund) -> Laputan(raymund)\nforall x (Divers(x) -> not Fresh(x))\n\nnot Fresh(raymund)\n\ntherefore Fresh(raymund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Cornellis is not grisly. Cornellis is cadaveric. Cornellis is chivalrous. If Cornellis is chivalrous and Cornellis is not grisly then Cornellis is savorless. If someone is savorless and not grisly then they are perceived. All perceived, cadaveric people are roguish. If someone is foppish and chivalrous then they are cadaveric. If Cornellis is savorless then Cornellis is perceived. Red people are not chivalrous. Cornellis is savorless.", "logic": "\nnot Grisly(cornellis)\nCadaveric(cornellis)\nChivalrous(cornellis)\nChivalrous(cornellis) and not Grisly(cornellis) -> Savorless(cornellis)\nforall x (Savorless(x) and not Grisly(x) -> Perceived(x))\nforall x (Perceived(x) and Cadaveric(x) -> Roguish(x))\nforall x (Foppish(x) and Chivalrous(x) -> Cadaveric(x))\nSavorless(cornellis) -> Perceived(cornellis)\nforall x (Grisly(x) -> not Chivalrous(x))\n\nSavorless(cornellis)\n\nChivalrous(cornellis) and not Grisly(cornellis) and Chivalrous(cornellis) and not Grisly(cornellis) -> Savorless(cornellis) -> therefore Savorless(cornellis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Wynnie is not potbound. Wynnie is immunized. Wynnie is bowing. If Wynnie is bowing and Wynnie is not potbound then Wynnie is unobserved. If someone is unobserved and not potbound then they are basilican. All basilican, immunized people are pilary. If someone is ordained and bowing then they are immunized. If Wynnie is unobserved then Wynnie is basilican. Red people are not bowing. Wynnie is not unobserved.", "logic": "\nnot Potbound(wynnie)\nImmunized(wynnie)\nBowing(wynnie)\nBowing(wynnie) and not Potbound(wynnie) -> Unobserved(wynnie)\nforall x (Unobserved(x) and not Potbound(x) -> Basilican(x))\nforall x (Basilican(x) and Immunized(x) -> Pilary(x))\nforall x (Ordained(x) and Bowing(x) -> Immunized(x))\nUnobserved(wynnie) -> Basilican(wynnie)\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> not Bowing(x))\n\nnot Unobserved(wynnie)\n\nBowing(wynnie) and not Potbound(wynnie) and Bowing(wynnie) and not Potbound(wynnie) -> Unobserved(wynnie) -> therefore Unobserved(wynnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Chance is not nutlike. Chance is unionised. Chance is glum. If Chance is glum and Chance is not nutlike then Chance is unfading. If someone is unfading and not nutlike then they are cyclic. All cyclic, unionised people are imaginary. If someone is godly and glum then they are unionised. If Chance is unfading then Chance is cyclic. Red people are not glum. Chance is cyclic.", "logic": "\nnot Nutlike(chance)\nUnionised(chance)\nGlum(chance)\nGlum(chance) and not Nutlike(chance) -> Unfading(chance)\nforall x (Unfading(x) and not Nutlike(x) -> Cyclic(x))\nforall x (Cyclic(x) and Unionised(x) -> Imaginary(x))\nforall x (Godly(x) and Glum(x) -> Unionised(x))\nUnfading(chance) -> Cyclic(chance)\nforall x (Nutlike(x) -> not Glum(x))\n\nCyclic(chance)\n\nGlum(chance) and not Nutlike(chance) and Glum(chance) and not Nutlike(chance) -> Unfading(chance) -> therefore Unfading(chance) Unfading(chance) and Unfading(chance) -> Cyclic(chance) -> therefore Cyclic(chance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Shana is not gimpy. Shana is secret. Shana is climatic. If Shana is climatic and Shana is not gimpy then Shana is cavernous. If someone is cavernous and not gimpy then they are overeager. All overeager, secret people are dinky. If someone is romance and climatic then they are secret. If Shana is cavernous then Shana is overeager. Red people are not climatic. Shana is not overeager.", "logic": "\nnot Gimpy(shana)\nSecret(shana)\nClimatic(shana)\nClimatic(shana) and not Gimpy(shana) -> Cavernous(shana)\nforall x (Cavernous(x) and not Gimpy(x) -> Overeager(x))\nforall x (Overeager(x) and Secret(x) -> Dinky(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) and Climatic(x) -> Secret(x))\nCavernous(shana) -> Overeager(shana)\nforall x (Gimpy(x) -> not Climatic(x))\n\nnot Overeager(shana)\n\nClimatic(shana) and not Gimpy(shana) and Climatic(shana) and not Gimpy(shana) -> Cavernous(shana) -> therefore Cavernous(shana) Cavernous(shana) and Cavernous(shana) -> Overeager(shana) -> therefore Overeager(shana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Kathi is not cereal. Kathi is anaerobic. Kathi is swingy. If Kathi is swingy and Kathi is not cereal then Kathi is nationwide. If someone is nationwide and not cereal then they are livelong. All livelong, anaerobic people are unbowed. If someone is feline and swingy then they are anaerobic. If Kathi is nationwide then Kathi is livelong. Red people are not swingy. Kathi is unbowed.", "logic": "\nnot Cereal(kathi)\nAnaerobic(kathi)\nSwingy(kathi)\nSwingy(kathi) and not Cereal(kathi) -> Nationwide(kathi)\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and not Cereal(x) -> Livelong(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and Anaerobic(x) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Feline(x) and Swingy(x) -> Anaerobic(x))\nNationwide(kathi) -> Livelong(kathi)\nforall x (Cereal(x) -> not Swingy(x))\n\nUnbowed(kathi)\n\nSwingy(kathi) and not Cereal(kathi) and Swingy(kathi) and not Cereal(kathi) -> Nationwide(kathi) -> therefore Nationwide(kathi) Nationwide(kathi) and Nationwide(kathi) -> Livelong(kathi) -> therefore Livelong(kathi) Livelong(kathi) and Anaerobic(kathi) and forall x (Livelong(x) and Anaerobic(x) -> Unbowed(x)) -> therefore Unbowed(kathi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Milli is not monkish. Milli is dissolute. Milli is sinister. If Milli is sinister and Milli is not monkish then Milli is creole. If someone is creole and not monkish then they are threefold. All threefold, dissolute people are mislabeled. If someone is enured and sinister then they are dissolute. If Milli is creole then Milli is threefold. Red people are not sinister. Milli is not mislabeled.", "logic": "\nnot Monkish(milli)\nDissolute(milli)\nSinister(milli)\nSinister(milli) and not Monkish(milli) -> Creole(milli)\nforall x (Creole(x) and not Monkish(x) -> Threefold(x))\nforall x (Threefold(x) and Dissolute(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\nforall x (Enured(x) and Sinister(x) -> Dissolute(x))\nCreole(milli) -> Threefold(milli)\nforall x (Monkish(x) -> not Sinister(x))\n\nnot Mislabeled(milli)\n\nSinister(milli) and not Monkish(milli) and Sinister(milli) and not Monkish(milli) -> Creole(milli) -> therefore Creole(milli) Creole(milli) and Creole(milli) -> Threefold(milli) -> therefore Threefold(milli) Threefold(milli) and Dissolute(milli) and forall x (Threefold(x) and Dissolute(x) -> Mislabeled(x)) -> therefore Mislabeled(milli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "The clary is styptic. The kent is avellan. The tome is styptic. The danika lacerate the clary. If something is avellan then it mizzle the clary. If something grunt the clary then the clary lacerate the tome. If something grunt the danika then the danika lacerate the clary. If the clary is styptic then the clary lacerate the danika. If something mizzle the clary then it grunt the tome. If something grunt the tome then the tome is avellan. The clary is styptic.", "logic": "\nStyptic(clary)\nAvellan(kent)\nStyptic(tome)\nLacerate(danika, clary)\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Mizzle(x, clary))\nforall x (Grunt(x, clary) -> Lacerate(clary, tome))\nforall x (Grunt(x, danika) -> Lacerate(danika, clary))\nStyptic(clary) -> Lacerate(clary, danika)\nforall x (Mizzle(x, clary) -> Grunt(x, tome))\nforall x (Grunt(x, tome) -> Avellan(tome))\n\nStyptic(clary)\n\ntherefore Styptic(clary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The lay is sudsy. The sibyl is capital. The gian is sudsy. The margette dance the lay. If something is capital then it exercise the lay. If something propose the lay then the lay dance the gian. If something propose the margette then the margette dance the lay. If the lay is sudsy then the lay dance the margette. If something exercise the lay then it propose the gian. If something propose the gian then the gian is capital. The lay is not sudsy.", "logic": "\nSudsy(lay)\nCapital(sibyl)\nSudsy(gian)\nDance(margette, lay)\nforall x (Capital(x) -> Exercise(x, lay))\nforall x (Propose(x, lay) -> Dance(lay, gian))\nforall x (Propose(x, margette) -> Dance(margette, lay))\nSudsy(lay) -> Dance(lay, margette)\nforall x (Exercise(x, lay) -> Propose(x, gian))\nforall x (Propose(x, gian) -> Capital(gian))\n\nnot Sudsy(lay)\n\ntherefore Sudsy(lay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The skip is dispersed. The zippy is prolonged. The aubree is dispersed. The wynn open the skip. If something is prolonged then it seed the skip. If something exhilarate the skip then the skip open the aubree. If something exhilarate the wynn then the wynn open the skip. If the skip is dispersed then the skip open the wynn. If something seed the skip then it exhilarate the aubree. If something exhilarate the aubree then the aubree is prolonged. The skip open the wynn.", "logic": "\nDispersed(skip)\nProlonged(zippy)\nDispersed(aubree)\nOpen(wynn, skip)\nforall x (Prolonged(x) -> Seed(x, skip))\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, skip) -> Open(skip, aubree))\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, wynn) -> Open(wynn, skip))\nDispersed(skip) -> Open(skip, wynn)\nforall x (Seed(x, skip) -> Exhilarate(x, aubree))\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, aubree) -> Prolonged(aubree))\n\nOpen(skip, wynn)\n\nDispersed(skip) and Dispersed(skip) -> Open(skip, wynn) -> therefore Open(skip, wynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The ivor is purulent. The addie is unrelieved. The nanete is purulent. The shadow inveigle the ivor. If something is unrelieved then it burl the ivor. If something gazump the ivor then the ivor inveigle the nanete. If something gazump the shadow then the shadow inveigle the ivor. If the ivor is purulent then the ivor inveigle the shadow. If something burl the ivor then it gazump the nanete. If something gazump the nanete then the nanete is unrelieved. The ivor does not see the shadow.", "logic": "\nPurulent(ivor)\nUnrelieved(addie)\nPurulent(nanete)\nInveigle(shadow, ivor)\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Burl(x, ivor))\nforall x (Gazump(x, ivor) -> Inveigle(ivor, nanete))\nforall x (Gazump(x, shadow) -> Inveigle(shadow, ivor))\nPurulent(ivor) -> Inveigle(ivor, shadow)\nforall x (Burl(x, ivor) -> Gazump(x, nanete))\nforall x (Gazump(x, nanete) -> Unrelieved(nanete))\n\nnot Inveigle(ivor, shadow)\n\nPurulent(ivor) and Purulent(ivor) -> Inveigle(ivor, shadow) -> therefore Inveigle(ivor, shadow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The faun is loveless. The celle is workable. The elvera is loveless. The jessey accession the faun. If something is workable then it proctor the faun. If something rebuild the faun then the faun accession the elvera. If something rebuild the jessey then the jessey accession the faun. If the faun is loveless then the faun accession the jessey. If something proctor the faun then it rebuild the elvera. If something rebuild the elvera then the elvera is workable. The celle rebuild the elvera.", "logic": "\nLoveless(faun)\nWorkable(celle)\nLoveless(elvera)\nAccession(jessey, faun)\nforall x (Workable(x) -> Proctor(x, faun))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, faun) -> Accession(faun, elvera))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, jessey) -> Accession(jessey, faun))\nLoveless(faun) -> Accession(faun, jessey)\nforall x (Proctor(x, faun) -> Rebuild(x, elvera))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, elvera) -> Workable(elvera))\n\nRebuild(celle, elvera)\n\nWorkable(celle) and forall x (Workable(x) -> Proctor(x, faun)) -> therefore Proctor(celle, faun) Proctor(celle, faun) and forall x (Proctor(x, faun) -> Rebuild(x, elvera)) -> therefore Rebuild(celle, elvera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The joseph is hexed. The jamima is assonant. The starla is hexed. The averil sexualise the joseph. If something is assonant then it temporize the joseph. If something pray the joseph then the joseph sexualise the starla. If something pray the averil then the averil sexualise the joseph. If the joseph is hexed then the joseph sexualise the averil. If something temporize the joseph then it pray the starla. If something pray the starla then the starla is assonant. The jamima does not chase the starla.", "logic": "\nHexed(joseph)\nAssonant(jamima)\nHexed(starla)\nSexualise(averil, joseph)\nforall x (Assonant(x) -> Temporize(x, joseph))\nforall x (Pray(x, joseph) -> Sexualise(joseph, starla))\nforall x (Pray(x, averil) -> Sexualise(averil, joseph))\nHexed(joseph) -> Sexualise(joseph, averil)\nforall x (Temporize(x, joseph) -> Pray(x, starla))\nforall x (Pray(x, starla) -> Assonant(starla))\n\nnot Pray(jamima, starla)\n\nAssonant(jamima) and forall x (Assonant(x) -> Temporize(x, joseph)) -> therefore Temporize(jamima, joseph) Temporize(jamima, joseph) and forall x (Temporize(x, joseph) -> Pray(x, starla)) -> therefore Pray(jamima, starla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The temp is obese. The rae is rootbound. The xylina is obese. The clarence appreciate the temp. If something is rootbound then it presume the temp. If something grain the temp then the temp appreciate the xylina. If something grain the clarence then the clarence appreciate the temp. If the temp is obese then the temp appreciate the clarence. If something presume the temp then it grain the xylina. If something grain the xylina then the xylina is rootbound. The xylina is rootbound.", "logic": "\nObese(temp)\nRootbound(rae)\nObese(xylina)\nAppreciate(clarence, temp)\nforall x (Rootbound(x) -> Presume(x, temp))\nforall x (Grain(x, temp) -> Appreciate(temp, xylina))\nforall x (Grain(x, clarence) -> Appreciate(clarence, temp))\nObese(temp) -> Appreciate(temp, clarence)\nforall x (Presume(x, temp) -> Grain(x, xylina))\nforall x (Grain(x, xylina) -> Rootbound(xylina))\n\nRootbound(xylina)\n\nRootbound(rae) and forall x (Rootbound(x) -> Presume(x, temp)) -> therefore Presume(rae, temp) Presume(rae, temp) and forall x (Presume(x, temp) -> Grain(x, xylina)) -> therefore Grain(rae, xylina) Grain(rae, xylina) and forall x (Grain(x, xylina) -> Rootbound(xylina)) -> therefore Rootbound(xylina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The raimund is modern. The helmuth is communal. The aram is modern. The dorise grouse the raimund. If something is communal then it tink the raimund. If something prime the raimund then the raimund grouse the aram. If something prime the dorise then the dorise grouse the raimund. If the raimund is modern then the raimund grouse the dorise. If something tink the raimund then it prime the aram. If something prime the aram then the aram is communal. The aram is not communal.", "logic": "\nModern(raimund)\nCommunal(helmuth)\nModern(aram)\nGrouse(dorise, raimund)\nforall x (Communal(x) -> Tink(x, raimund))\nforall x (Prime(x, raimund) -> Grouse(raimund, aram))\nforall x (Prime(x, dorise) -> Grouse(dorise, raimund))\nModern(raimund) -> Grouse(raimund, dorise)\nforall x (Tink(x, raimund) -> Prime(x, aram))\nforall x (Prime(x, aram) -> Communal(aram))\n\nnot Communal(aram)\n\nCommunal(helmuth) and forall x (Communal(x) -> Tink(x, raimund)) -> therefore Tink(helmuth, raimund) Tink(helmuth, raimund) and forall x (Tink(x, raimund) -> Prime(x, aram)) -> therefore Prime(helmuth, aram) Prime(helmuth, aram) and forall x (Prime(x, aram) -> Communal(aram)) -> therefore Communal(aram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The joanie is incurious. The olimpia is semidark. The anatoly is incurious. The raymund exceed the joanie. If something is semidark then it brainstorm the joanie. If something steep the joanie then the joanie exceed the anatoly. If something steep the raymund then the raymund exceed the joanie. If the joanie is incurious then the joanie exceed the raymund. If something brainstorm the joanie then it steep the anatoly. If something steep the anatoly then the anatoly is semidark. The joanie does not eat the joanie.", "logic": "\nIncurious(joanie)\nSemidark(olimpia)\nIncurious(anatoly)\nExceed(raymund, joanie)\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Brainstorm(x, joanie))\nforall x (Steep(x, joanie) -> Exceed(joanie, anatoly))\nforall x (Steep(x, raymund) -> Exceed(raymund, joanie))\nIncurious(joanie) -> Exceed(joanie, raymund)\nforall x (Brainstorm(x, joanie) -> Steep(x, anatoly))\nforall x (Steep(x, anatoly) -> Semidark(anatoly))\n\nnot Brainstorm(joanie, joanie)\n\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Brainstorm(x, joanie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The wilona is churning. The caril is acervate. The emlynn is churning. The gunter style the wilona. If something is acervate then it aggravate the wilona. If something sled the wilona then the wilona style the emlynn. If something sled the gunter then the gunter style the wilona. If the wilona is churning then the wilona style the gunter. If something aggravate the wilona then it sled the emlynn. If something sled the emlynn then the emlynn is acervate. The gunter aggravate the wilona.", "logic": "\nChurning(wilona)\nAcervate(caril)\nChurning(emlynn)\nStyle(gunter, wilona)\nforall x (Acervate(x) -> Aggravate(x, wilona))\nforall x (Sled(x, wilona) -> Style(wilona, emlynn))\nforall x (Sled(x, gunter) -> Style(gunter, wilona))\nChurning(wilona) -> Style(wilona, gunter)\nforall x (Aggravate(x, wilona) -> Sled(x, emlynn))\nforall x (Sled(x, emlynn) -> Acervate(emlynn))\n\nAggravate(gunter, wilona)\n\nforall x (Acervate(x) -> Aggravate(x, wilona)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The powell is adjunctive. The trisha is freehanded. The sidonia is adjunctive. The vere admit the powell. If something is freehanded then it unify the powell. If something declaim the powell then the powell admit the sidonia. If something declaim the vere then the vere admit the powell. If the powell is adjunctive then the powell admit the vere. If something unify the powell then it declaim the sidonia. If something declaim the sidonia then the sidonia is freehanded. The vere does not chase the sidonia.", "logic": "\nAdjunctive(powell)\nFreehanded(trisha)\nAdjunctive(sidonia)\nAdmit(vere, powell)\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Unify(x, powell))\nforall x (Declaim(x, powell) -> Admit(powell, sidonia))\nforall x (Declaim(x, vere) -> Admit(vere, powell))\nAdjunctive(powell) -> Admit(powell, vere)\nforall x (Unify(x, powell) -> Declaim(x, sidonia))\nforall x (Declaim(x, sidonia) -> Freehanded(sidonia))\n\nnot Declaim(vere, sidonia)\n\nforall x (Unify(x, powell) -> Declaim(x, sidonia)) <- forall x (Freehanded(x) -> Unify(x, powell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The glenna is lumpen. The susannah is alchemic. The aleck is lumpen. The dorie recidivate the glenna. If something is alchemic then it tighten the glenna. If something ovenbake the glenna then the glenna recidivate the aleck. If something ovenbake the dorie then the dorie recidivate the glenna. If the glenna is lumpen then the glenna recidivate the dorie. If something tighten the glenna then it ovenbake the aleck. If something ovenbake the aleck then the aleck is alchemic. The glenna ovenbake the aleck.", "logic": "\nLumpen(glenna)\nAlchemic(susannah)\nLumpen(aleck)\nRecidivate(dorie, glenna)\nforall x (Alchemic(x) -> Tighten(x, glenna))\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, glenna) -> Recidivate(glenna, aleck))\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, dorie) -> Recidivate(dorie, glenna))\nLumpen(glenna) -> Recidivate(glenna, dorie)\nforall x (Tighten(x, glenna) -> Ovenbake(x, aleck))\nforall x (Ovenbake(x, aleck) -> Alchemic(aleck))\n\nOvenbake(glenna, aleck)\n\nforall x (Tighten(x, glenna) -> Ovenbake(x, aleck)) <- forall x (Alchemic(x) -> Tighten(x, glenna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The ardath is glib. The lefty is shifty. The laurance is glib. The beverlie blandish the ardath. If something is shifty then it tapdance the ardath. If something clamber the ardath then the ardath blandish the laurance. If something clamber the beverlie then the beverlie blandish the ardath. If the ardath is glib then the ardath blandish the beverlie. If something tapdance the ardath then it clamber the laurance. If something clamber the laurance then the laurance is shifty. The beverlie does not eat the lefty.", "logic": "\nGlib(ardath)\nShifty(lefty)\nGlib(laurance)\nBlandish(beverlie, ardath)\nforall x (Shifty(x) -> Tapdance(x, ardath))\nforall x (Clamber(x, ardath) -> Blandish(ardath, laurance))\nforall x (Clamber(x, beverlie) -> Blandish(beverlie, ardath))\nGlib(ardath) -> Blandish(ardath, beverlie)\nforall x (Tapdance(x, ardath) -> Clamber(x, laurance))\nforall x (Clamber(x, laurance) -> Shifty(laurance))\n\nnot Tapdance(beverlie, lefty)\n\nnot Tapdance(beverlie, lefty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The eduard is membered. The wilson is offending. The davey is membered. The luke circuit the eduard. If something is offending then it cede the eduard. If something synthesise the eduard then the eduard circuit the davey. If something synthesise the luke then the luke circuit the eduard. If the eduard is membered then the eduard circuit the luke. If something cede the eduard then it synthesise the davey. If something synthesise the davey then the davey is offending. The eduard is kind.", "logic": "\nMembered(eduard)\nOffending(wilson)\nMembered(davey)\nCircuit(luke, eduard)\nforall x (Offending(x) -> Cede(x, eduard))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, eduard) -> Circuit(eduard, davey))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, luke) -> Circuit(luke, eduard))\nMembered(eduard) -> Circuit(eduard, luke)\nforall x (Cede(x, eduard) -> Synthesise(x, davey))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, davey) -> Offending(davey))\n\nKind(eduard)\n\nKind(eduard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The elisa is rotatable. The antoni is lossless. The trixi is rotatable. The hyman jangle the elisa. If something is lossless then it gibe the elisa. If something imprint the elisa then the elisa jangle the trixi. If something imprint the hyman then the hyman jangle the elisa. If the elisa is rotatable then the elisa jangle the hyman. If something gibe the elisa then it imprint the trixi. If something imprint the trixi then the trixi is lossless. The trixi does not eat the hyman.", "logic": "\nRotatable(elisa)\nLossless(antoni)\nRotatable(trixi)\nJangle(hyman, elisa)\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Gibe(x, elisa))\nforall x (Imprint(x, elisa) -> Jangle(elisa, trixi))\nforall x (Imprint(x, hyman) -> Jangle(hyman, elisa))\nRotatable(elisa) -> Jangle(elisa, hyman)\nforall x (Gibe(x, elisa) -> Imprint(x, trixi))\nforall x (Imprint(x, trixi) -> Lossless(trixi))\n\nnot Gibe(trixi, hyman)\n\nnot Gibe(trixi, hyman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The sarene is indicatory. The rivi is bewitched. The herta is indicatory. The leigh doss the sarene. If something is bewitched then it bogey the sarene. If something nazify the sarene then the sarene doss the herta. If something nazify the leigh then the leigh doss the sarene. If the sarene is indicatory then the sarene doss the leigh. If something bogey the sarene then it nazify the herta. If something nazify the herta then the herta is bewitched. The leigh doss the rivi.", "logic": "\nIndicatory(sarene)\nBewitched(rivi)\nIndicatory(herta)\nDoss(leigh, sarene)\nforall x (Bewitched(x) -> Bogey(x, sarene))\nforall x (Nazify(x, sarene) -> Doss(sarene, herta))\nforall x (Nazify(x, leigh) -> Doss(leigh, sarene))\nIndicatory(sarene) -> Doss(sarene, leigh)\nforall x (Bogey(x, sarene) -> Nazify(x, herta))\nforall x (Nazify(x, herta) -> Bewitched(herta))\n\nDoss(leigh, rivi)\n\nDoss(leigh, rivi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Jephthah is wide. Jephthah is nitwitted. Jephthah is smoky. Jephthah is erogenous. Jephthah is amygdaline. Jephthah is dyslexic. Vasilis is wide. Vasilis is smoky. Vasilis is amygdaline. Vasilis is dyslexic. All nitwitted people are wide. If someone is ephemeral and amygdaline then they are dyslexic. All wide, erogenous people are nitwitted. Young people are erogenous. Nice people are ephemeral. If someone is nitwitted and ephemeral then they are smoky. Vasilis is wide.", "logic": "\nWide(jephthah)\nNitwitted(jephthah)\nSmoky(jephthah)\nErogenous(jephthah)\nAmygdaline(jephthah)\nDyslexic(jephthah)\nWide(vasilis)\nSmoky(vasilis)\nAmygdaline(vasilis)\nDyslexic(vasilis)\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Wide(x))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and Amygdaline(x) -> Dyslexic(x))\nforall x (Wide(x) and Erogenous(x) -> Nitwitted(x))\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) and Ephemeral(x) -> Smoky(x))\n\nWide(vasilis)\n\ntherefore Wide(vasilis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Farley is multilevel. Farley is potent. Farley is campanular. Farley is concessive. Farley is untouched. Farley is postmortal. Marti is multilevel. Marti is campanular. Marti is untouched. Marti is postmortal. All potent people are multilevel. If someone is sissyish and untouched then they are postmortal. All multilevel, concessive people are potent. Young people are concessive. Nice people are sissyish. If someone is potent and sissyish then they are campanular. Marti is not campanular.", "logic": "\nMultilevel(farley)\nPotent(farley)\nCampanular(farley)\nConcessive(farley)\nUntouched(farley)\nPostmortal(farley)\nMultilevel(marti)\nCampanular(marti)\nUntouched(marti)\nPostmortal(marti)\nforall x (Potent(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Sissyish(x) and Untouched(x) -> Postmortal(x))\nforall x (Multilevel(x) and Concessive(x) -> Potent(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Potent(x) -> Sissyish(x))\nforall x (Potent(x) and Sissyish(x) -> Campanular(x))\n\nnot Campanular(marti)\n\ntherefore Campanular(marti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Lusa is hokey. Lusa is spheroidal. Lusa is basipetal. Lusa is loud. Lusa is apodal. Lusa is leptorhine. Alexis is hokey. Alexis is basipetal. Alexis is apodal. Alexis is leptorhine. All spheroidal people are hokey. If someone is brindle and apodal then they are leptorhine. All hokey, loud people are spheroidal. Young people are loud. Nice people are brindle. If someone is spheroidal and brindle then they are basipetal. Alexis is loud.", "logic": "\nHokey(lusa)\nSpheroidal(lusa)\nBasipetal(lusa)\nLoud(lusa)\nApodal(lusa)\nLeptorhine(lusa)\nHokey(alexis)\nBasipetal(alexis)\nApodal(alexis)\nLeptorhine(alexis)\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) -> Hokey(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) and Apodal(x) -> Leptorhine(x))\nforall x (Hokey(x) and Loud(x) -> Spheroidal(x))\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) -> Loud(x))\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) and Brindle(x) -> Basipetal(x))\n\nLoud(alexis)\n\nLeptorhine(alexis) and forall x (Leptorhine(x) -> Loud(x)) -> therefore Loud(alexis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Tabbitha is stumpy. Tabbitha is triplex. Tabbitha is gross. Tabbitha is dingy. Tabbitha is askance. Tabbitha is petalous. Trina is stumpy. Trina is gross. Trina is askance. Trina is petalous. All triplex people are stumpy. If someone is areolate and askance then they are petalous. All stumpy, dingy people are triplex. Young people are dingy. Nice people are areolate. If someone is triplex and areolate then they are gross. Tabbitha is not areolate.", "logic": "\nStumpy(tabbitha)\nTriplex(tabbitha)\nGross(tabbitha)\nDingy(tabbitha)\nAskance(tabbitha)\nPetalous(tabbitha)\nStumpy(trina)\nGross(trina)\nAskance(trina)\nPetalous(trina)\nforall x (Triplex(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nforall x (Areolate(x) and Askance(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Stumpy(x) and Dingy(x) -> Triplex(x))\nforall x (Petalous(x) -> Dingy(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) -> Areolate(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) and Areolate(x) -> Gross(x))\n\nnot Areolate(tabbitha)\n\nTriplex(tabbitha) and forall x (Triplex(x) -> Areolate(x)) -> therefore Areolate(tabbitha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Ivory is drugged. Ivory is sable. Ivory is felicitous. Ivory is unstable. Ivory is bavarian. Ivory is unjointed. Enrika is drugged. Enrika is felicitous. Enrika is bavarian. Enrika is unjointed. All sable people are drugged. If someone is vanished and bavarian then they are unjointed. All drugged, unstable people are sable. Young people are unstable. Nice people are vanished. If someone is sable and vanished then they are felicitous. Enrika is sable.", "logic": "\nDrugged(ivory)\nSable(ivory)\nFelicitous(ivory)\nUnstable(ivory)\nBavarian(ivory)\nUnjointed(ivory)\nDrugged(enrika)\nFelicitous(enrika)\nBavarian(enrika)\nUnjointed(enrika)\nforall x (Sable(x) -> Drugged(x))\nforall x (Vanished(x) and Bavarian(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Drugged(x) and Unstable(x) -> Sable(x))\nforall x (Unjointed(x) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Sable(x) -> Vanished(x))\nforall x (Sable(x) and Vanished(x) -> Felicitous(x))\n\nSable(enrika)\n\nUnjointed(enrika) and forall x (Unjointed(x) -> Unstable(x)) -> therefore Unstable(enrika) Drugged(enrika) and Unstable(enrika) and forall x (Drugged(x) and Unstable(x) -> Sable(x)) -> therefore Sable(enrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Martainn is paraguayan. Martainn is trivalent. Martainn is raftered. Martainn is touristed. Martainn is septicemic. Martainn is uncharged. April is paraguayan. April is raftered. April is septicemic. April is uncharged. All trivalent people are paraguayan. If someone is molal and septicemic then they are uncharged. All paraguayan, touristed people are trivalent. Young people are touristed. Nice people are molal. If someone is trivalent and molal then they are raftered. April is not trivalent.", "logic": "\nParaguayan(martainn)\nTrivalent(martainn)\nRaftered(martainn)\nTouristed(martainn)\nSepticemic(martainn)\nUncharged(martainn)\nParaguayan(april)\nRaftered(april)\nSepticemic(april)\nUncharged(april)\nforall x (Trivalent(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Molal(x) and Septicemic(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) and Touristed(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Touristed(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) and Molal(x) -> Raftered(x))\n\nnot Trivalent(april)\n\nUncharged(april) and forall x (Uncharged(x) -> Touristed(x)) -> therefore Touristed(april) Paraguayan(april) and Touristed(april) and forall x (Paraguayan(x) and Touristed(x) -> Trivalent(x)) -> therefore Trivalent(april)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Nadya is delusory. Nadya is indonesian. Nadya is undefeated. Nadya is cultivable. Nadya is disgraced. Nadya is admired. Erich is delusory. Erich is undefeated. Erich is disgraced. Erich is admired. All indonesian people are delusory. If someone is tactile and disgraced then they are admired. All delusory, cultivable people are indonesian. Young people are cultivable. Nice people are tactile. If someone is indonesian and tactile then they are undefeated. Erich is tactile.", "logic": "\nDelusory(nadya)\nIndonesian(nadya)\nUndefeated(nadya)\nCultivable(nadya)\nDisgraced(nadya)\nAdmired(nadya)\nDelusory(erich)\nUndefeated(erich)\nDisgraced(erich)\nAdmired(erich)\nforall x (Indonesian(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Tactile(x) and Disgraced(x) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) and Cultivable(x) -> Indonesian(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) -> Cultivable(x))\nforall x (Indonesian(x) -> Tactile(x))\nforall x (Indonesian(x) and Tactile(x) -> Undefeated(x))\n\nTactile(erich)\n\nAdmired(erich) and forall x (Admired(x) -> Cultivable(x)) -> therefore Cultivable(erich) Delusory(erich) and Cultivable(erich) and forall x (Delusory(x) and Cultivable(x) -> Indonesian(x)) -> therefore Indonesian(erich) Indonesian(erich) and forall x (Indonesian(x) -> Tactile(x)) -> therefore Tactile(erich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Cole is deranged. Cole is bald. Cole is confounded. Cole is gyral. Cole is unhopeful. Cole is boytrose. Sondra is deranged. Sondra is confounded. Sondra is unhopeful. Sondra is boytrose. All bald people are deranged. If someone is silvan and unhopeful then they are boytrose. All deranged, gyral people are bald. Young people are gyral. Nice people are silvan. If someone is bald and silvan then they are confounded. Sondra is not silvan.", "logic": "\nDeranged(cole)\nBald(cole)\nConfounded(cole)\nGyral(cole)\nUnhopeful(cole)\nBoytrose(cole)\nDeranged(sondra)\nConfounded(sondra)\nUnhopeful(sondra)\nBoytrose(sondra)\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Silvan(x) and Unhopeful(x) -> Boytrose(x))\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Gyral(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Boytrose(x) -> Gyral(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Silvan(x) -> Confounded(x))\n\nnot Silvan(sondra)\n\nBoytrose(sondra) and forall x (Boytrose(x) -> Gyral(x)) -> therefore Gyral(sondra) Deranged(sondra) and Gyral(sondra) and forall x (Deranged(x) and Gyral(x) -> Bald(x)) -> therefore Bald(sondra) Bald(sondra) and forall x (Bald(x) -> Silvan(x)) -> therefore Silvan(sondra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "The fanya is ribbonlike. If something is twinned then it is earlyish. If the fanya is ribbonlike then the fanya is twinned. If something is parvenue and twinned then it is ribbonlike. Green things are coriaceous. If something is parvenue and coriaceous then it is earlyish. If the fanya is parvenue then the fanya is twinned. The fanya is ribbonlike.", "logic": "\nRibbonlike(fanya)\nforall x (Twinned(x) -> Earlyish(x))\nRibbonlike(fanya) -> Twinned(fanya)\nforall x (Parvenue(x) and Twinned(x) -> Ribbonlike(x))\nforall x (Earlyish(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Parvenue(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Earlyish(x))\nParvenue(fanya) -> Twinned(fanya)\n\nRibbonlike(fanya)\n\ntherefore Ribbonlike(fanya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The kalil is proper. If something is unassisted then it is behind. If the kalil is proper then the kalil is unassisted. If something is crucial and unassisted then it is proper. Green things are calced. If something is crucial and calced then it is behind. If the kalil is crucial then the kalil is unassisted. The kalil is not proper.", "logic": "\nProper(kalil)\nforall x (Unassisted(x) -> Behind(x))\nProper(kalil) -> Unassisted(kalil)\nforall x (Crucial(x) and Unassisted(x) -> Proper(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Crucial(x) and Calced(x) -> Behind(x))\nCrucial(kalil) -> Unassisted(kalil)\n\nnot Proper(kalil)\n\ntherefore Proper(kalil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The lydie is deciduous. If something is angolan then it is holy. If the lydie is deciduous then the lydie is angolan. If something is weakened and angolan then it is deciduous. Green things are pretorian. If something is weakened and pretorian then it is holy. If the lydie is weakened then the lydie is angolan. The lydie is angolan.", "logic": "\nDeciduous(lydie)\nforall x (Angolan(x) -> Holy(x))\nDeciduous(lydie) -> Angolan(lydie)\nforall x (Weakened(x) and Angolan(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nforall x (Holy(x) -> Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Weakened(x) and Pretorian(x) -> Holy(x))\nWeakened(lydie) -> Angolan(lydie)\n\nAngolan(lydie)\n\nDeciduous(lydie) and Deciduous(lydie) -> Angolan(lydie) -> therefore Angolan(lydie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The tobin is brindle. If something is suffering then it is tactful. If the tobin is brindle then the tobin is suffering. If something is serpentine and suffering then it is brindle. Green things are changeful. If something is serpentine and changeful then it is tactful. If the tobin is serpentine then the tobin is suffering. The tobin is not suffering.", "logic": "\nBrindle(tobin)\nforall x (Suffering(x) -> Tactful(x))\nBrindle(tobin) -> Suffering(tobin)\nforall x (Serpentine(x) and Suffering(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Tactful(x) -> Changeful(x))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) and Changeful(x) -> Tactful(x))\nSerpentine(tobin) -> Suffering(tobin)\n\nnot Suffering(tobin)\n\nBrindle(tobin) and Brindle(tobin) -> Suffering(tobin) -> therefore Suffering(tobin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The nathalia is feckless. If something is springy then it is correct. If the nathalia is feckless then the nathalia is springy. If something is ominous and springy then it is feckless. Green things are devoted. If something is ominous and devoted then it is correct. If the nathalia is ominous then the nathalia is springy. The nathalia is correct.", "logic": "\nFeckless(nathalia)\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Correct(x))\nFeckless(nathalia) -> Springy(nathalia)\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Springy(x) -> Feckless(x))\nforall x (Correct(x) -> Devoted(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Devoted(x) -> Correct(x))\nOminous(nathalia) -> Springy(nathalia)\n\nCorrect(nathalia)\n\nFeckless(nathalia) and Feckless(nathalia) -> Springy(nathalia) -> therefore Springy(nathalia) Springy(nathalia) and forall x (Springy(x) -> Correct(x)) -> therefore Correct(nathalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The jacintha is traceable. If something is dextrorse then it is hangdog. If the jacintha is traceable then the jacintha is dextrorse. If something is cheliceral and dextrorse then it is traceable. Green things are cocksure. If something is cheliceral and cocksure then it is hangdog. If the jacintha is cheliceral then the jacintha is dextrorse. The jacintha is not hangdog.", "logic": "\nTraceable(jacintha)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nTraceable(jacintha) -> Dextrorse(jacintha)\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) and Dextrorse(x) -> Traceable(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) -> Cocksure(x))\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) and Cocksure(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nCheliceral(jacintha) -> Dextrorse(jacintha)\n\nnot Hangdog(jacintha)\n\nTraceable(jacintha) and Traceable(jacintha) -> Dextrorse(jacintha) -> therefore Dextrorse(jacintha) Dextrorse(jacintha) and forall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Hangdog(x)) -> therefore Hangdog(jacintha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The west is possessive. If something is recovered then it is unentitled. If the west is possessive then the west is recovered. If something is assailable and recovered then it is possessive. Green things are scalelike. If something is assailable and scalelike then it is unentitled. If the west is assailable then the west is recovered. The west is scalelike.", "logic": "\nPossessive(west)\nforall x (Recovered(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nPossessive(west) -> Recovered(west)\nforall x (Assailable(x) and Recovered(x) -> Possessive(x))\nforall x (Unentitled(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Assailable(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nAssailable(west) -> Recovered(west)\n\nScalelike(west)\n\nPossessive(west) and Possessive(west) -> Recovered(west) -> therefore Recovered(west) Recovered(west) and forall x (Recovered(x) -> Unentitled(x)) -> therefore Unentitled(west) Unentitled(west) and forall x (Unentitled(x) -> Scalelike(x)) -> therefore Scalelike(west)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The bucky is auld. If something is obliged then it is uniparous. If the bucky is auld then the bucky is obliged. If something is hateful and obliged then it is auld. Green things are fulgurant. If something is hateful and fulgurant then it is uniparous. If the bucky is hateful then the bucky is obliged. The bucky is not fulgurant.", "logic": "\nAuld(bucky)\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nAuld(bucky) -> Obliged(bucky)\nforall x (Hateful(x) and Obliged(x) -> Auld(x))\nforall x (Uniparous(x) -> Fulgurant(x))\nforall x (Hateful(x) and Fulgurant(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nHateful(bucky) -> Obliged(bucky)\n\nnot Fulgurant(bucky)\n\nAuld(bucky) and Auld(bucky) -> Obliged(bucky) -> therefore Obliged(bucky) Obliged(bucky) and forall x (Obliged(x) -> Uniparous(x)) -> therefore Uniparous(bucky) Uniparous(bucky) and forall x (Uniparous(x) -> Fulgurant(x)) -> therefore Fulgurant(bucky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The margurite is quavering. If something is infrequent then it is crusty. If the margurite is quavering then the margurite is infrequent. If something is tallish and infrequent then it is quavering. Green things are legged. If something is tallish and legged then it is crusty. If the margurite is tallish then the margurite is infrequent. The margurite is not tallish.", "logic": "\nQuavering(margurite)\nforall x (Infrequent(x) -> Crusty(x))\nQuavering(margurite) -> Infrequent(margurite)\nforall x (Tallish(x) and Infrequent(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Crusty(x) -> Legged(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) and Legged(x) -> Crusty(x))\nTallish(margurite) -> Infrequent(margurite)\n\nnot Tallish(margurite)\n\nnot Tallish(margurite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The ronda is knavish. If something is modeled then it is goateed. If the ronda is knavish then the ronda is modeled. If something is uncovered and modeled then it is knavish. Green things are nagging. If something is uncovered and nagging then it is goateed. If the ronda is uncovered then the ronda is modeled. The ronda needs the ronda.", "logic": "\nKnavish(ronda)\nforall x (Modeled(x) -> Goateed(x))\nKnavish(ronda) -> Modeled(ronda)\nforall x (Uncovered(x) and Modeled(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Goateed(x) -> Nagging(x))\nforall x (Uncovered(x) and Nagging(x) -> Goateed(x))\nUncovered(ronda) -> Modeled(ronda)\n\nNeeds(ronda, ronda)\n\nNeeds(ronda, ronda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The lettie is stuffed. If something is inside then it is faraway. If the lettie is stuffed then the lettie is inside. If something is granulose and inside then it is stuffed. Green things are deadening. If something is granulose and deadening then it is faraway. If the lettie is granulose then the lettie is inside. The lettie does not eat the lettie.", "logic": "\nStuffed(lettie)\nforall x (Inside(x) -> Faraway(x))\nStuffed(lettie) -> Inside(lettie)\nforall x (Granulose(x) and Inside(x) -> Stuffed(x))\nforall x (Faraway(x) -> Deadening(x))\nforall x (Granulose(x) and Deadening(x) -> Faraway(x))\nGranulose(lettie) -> Inside(lettie)\n\nnot Eats(lettie, lettie)\n\nnot Eats(lettie, lettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The ally is amenable. If something is unsexy then it is epiphysial. If the ally is amenable then the ally is unsexy. If something is attacking and unsexy then it is amenable. Green things are pouchlike. If something is attacking and pouchlike then it is epiphysial. If the ally is attacking then the ally is unsexy. The ally likes the ally.", "logic": "\nAmenable(ally)\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Epiphysial(x))\nAmenable(ally) -> Unsexy(ally)\nforall x (Attacking(x) and Unsexy(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) and Pouchlike(x) -> Epiphysial(x))\nAttacking(ally) -> Unsexy(ally)\n\nLikes(ally, ally)\n\nLikes(ally, ally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Conway is talky. Conway is bygone. Conway is grievous. Lucien is talky. Kerry is not talky. Kerry is scummy. Peria is gingival. All milklike, grievous things are benzenoid. Green, grievous things are milklike. Green things are grievous. If Lucien is grievous and Lucien is gingival then Lucien is milklike. Kind, gingival things are scummy. If something is gingival and not grievous then it is talky. If something is talky and grievous then it is bygone. If something is talky and not scummy then it is bygone. Lucien is talky.", "logic": "\nTalky(conway)\nBygone(conway)\nGrievous(conway)\nTalky(lucien)\nnot Talky(kerry)\nScummy(kerry)\nGingival(peria)\nforall x (Milklike(x) and Grievous(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Scummy(x) and Grievous(x) -> Milklike(x))\nforall x (Scummy(x) -> Grievous(x))\nGrievous(lucien) and Gingival(lucien) -> Milklike(lucien)\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Gingival(x) -> Scummy(x))\nforall x (Gingival(x) and not Grievous(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Talky(x) and Grievous(x) -> Bygone(x))\nforall x (Talky(x) and not Scummy(x) -> Bygone(x))\n\nTalky(lucien)\n\ntherefore Talky(lucien)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Catriona is pulpy. Catriona is moved. Catriona is frisky. Shelia is pulpy. Baron is not pulpy. Baron is laureled. Sophey is quilted. All squalid, frisky things are scalic. Green, frisky things are squalid. Green things are frisky. If Shelia is frisky and Shelia is quilted then Shelia is squalid. Kind, quilted things are laureled. If something is quilted and not frisky then it is pulpy. If something is pulpy and frisky then it is moved. If something is pulpy and not laureled then it is moved. Catriona is not moved.", "logic": "\nPulpy(catriona)\nMoved(catriona)\nFrisky(catriona)\nPulpy(shelia)\nnot Pulpy(baron)\nLaureled(baron)\nQuilted(sophey)\nforall x (Squalid(x) and Frisky(x) -> Scalic(x))\nforall x (Laureled(x) and Frisky(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Laureled(x) -> Frisky(x))\nFrisky(shelia) and Quilted(shelia) -> Squalid(shelia)\nforall x (Frisky(x) and Quilted(x) -> Laureled(x))\nforall x (Quilted(x) and not Frisky(x) -> Pulpy(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and Frisky(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and not Laureled(x) -> Moved(x))\n\nnot Moved(catriona)\n\ntherefore Moved(catriona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Terrie is cuneiform. Terrie is overcast. Terrie is stemless. Isaiah is cuneiform. Allissa is not cuneiform. Allissa is zygodactyl. Verene is linelike. All preeminent, stemless things are clothed. Green, stemless things are preeminent. Green things are stemless. If Isaiah is stemless and Isaiah is linelike then Isaiah is preeminent. Kind, linelike things are zygodactyl. If something is linelike and not stemless then it is cuneiform. If something is cuneiform and stemless then it is overcast. If something is cuneiform and not zygodactyl then it is overcast. Allissa is stemless.", "logic": "\nCuneiform(terrie)\nOvercast(terrie)\nStemless(terrie)\nCuneiform(isaiah)\nnot Cuneiform(allissa)\nZygodactyl(allissa)\nLinelike(verene)\nforall x (Preeminent(x) and Stemless(x) -> Clothed(x))\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) and Stemless(x) -> Preeminent(x))\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Stemless(x))\nStemless(isaiah) and Linelike(isaiah) -> Preeminent(isaiah)\nforall x (Stemless(x) and Linelike(x) -> Zygodactyl(x))\nforall x (Linelike(x) and not Stemless(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Stemless(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and not Zygodactyl(x) -> Overcast(x))\n\nStemless(allissa)\n\nZygodactyl(allissa) and forall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Stemless(x)) -> therefore Stemless(allissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Arne is brickle. Arne is dandyish. Arne is acidotic. Marcie is brickle. Christyna is not brickle. Christyna is capacitive. Isadora is groomed. All haggard, acidotic things are fantastic. Green, acidotic things are haggard. Green things are acidotic. If Marcie is acidotic and Marcie is groomed then Marcie is haggard. Kind, groomed things are capacitive. If something is groomed and not acidotic then it is brickle. If something is brickle and acidotic then it is dandyish. If something is brickle and not capacitive then it is dandyish. Christyna is not acidotic.", "logic": "\nBrickle(arne)\nDandyish(arne)\nAcidotic(arne)\nBrickle(marcie)\nnot Brickle(christyna)\nCapacitive(christyna)\nGroomed(isadora)\nforall x (Haggard(x) and Acidotic(x) -> Fantastic(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) and Acidotic(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) -> Acidotic(x))\nAcidotic(marcie) and Groomed(marcie) -> Haggard(marcie)\nforall x (Acidotic(x) and Groomed(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nforall x (Groomed(x) and not Acidotic(x) -> Brickle(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) and Acidotic(x) -> Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) and not Capacitive(x) -> Dandyish(x))\n\nnot Acidotic(christyna)\n\nCapacitive(christyna) and forall x (Capacitive(x) -> Acidotic(x)) -> therefore Acidotic(christyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Candace is moderate. Candace is auxinic. Candace is eviscerate. Kip is moderate. Madeline is not moderate. Madeline is entozoan. Karilynn is maintained. All hallowed, eviscerate things are monoecious. Green, eviscerate things are hallowed. Green things are eviscerate. If Kip is eviscerate and Kip is maintained then Kip is hallowed. Kind, maintained things are entozoan. If something is maintained and not eviscerate then it is moderate. If something is moderate and eviscerate then it is auxinic. If something is moderate and not entozoan then it is auxinic. Madeline is hallowed.", "logic": "\nModerate(candace)\nAuxinic(candace)\nEviscerate(candace)\nModerate(kip)\nnot Moderate(madeline)\nEntozoan(madeline)\nMaintained(karilynn)\nforall x (Hallowed(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Monoecious(x))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Hallowed(x))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\nEviscerate(kip) and Maintained(kip) -> Hallowed(kip)\nforall x (Eviscerate(x) and Maintained(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Maintained(x) and not Eviscerate(x) -> Moderate(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Auxinic(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x) and not Entozoan(x) -> Auxinic(x))\n\nHallowed(madeline)\n\nEntozoan(madeline) and forall x (Entozoan(x) -> Eviscerate(x)) -> therefore Eviscerate(madeline) Entozoan(madeline) and Eviscerate(madeline) and forall x (Entozoan(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Hallowed(x)) -> therefore Hallowed(madeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Clayton is hale. Clayton is cystic. Clayton is deserving. Ilise is hale. Virgilio is not hale. Virgilio is seaborne. Morlee is esophageal. All labial, deserving things are heathen. Green, deserving things are labial. Green things are deserving. If Ilise is deserving and Ilise is esophageal then Ilise is labial. Kind, esophageal things are seaborne. If something is esophageal and not deserving then it is hale. If something is hale and deserving then it is cystic. If something is hale and not seaborne then it is cystic. Virgilio is not labial.", "logic": "\nHale(clayton)\nCystic(clayton)\nDeserving(clayton)\nHale(ilise)\nnot Hale(virgilio)\nSeaborne(virgilio)\nEsophageal(morlee)\nforall x (Labial(x) and Deserving(x) -> Heathen(x))\nforall x (Seaborne(x) and Deserving(x) -> Labial(x))\nforall x (Seaborne(x) -> Deserving(x))\nDeserving(ilise) and Esophageal(ilise) -> Labial(ilise)\nforall x (Deserving(x) and Esophageal(x) -> Seaborne(x))\nforall x (Esophageal(x) and not Deserving(x) -> Hale(x))\nforall x (Hale(x) and Deserving(x) -> Cystic(x))\nforall x (Hale(x) and not Seaborne(x) -> Cystic(x))\n\nnot Labial(virgilio)\n\nSeaborne(virgilio) and forall x (Seaborne(x) -> Deserving(x)) -> therefore Deserving(virgilio) Seaborne(virgilio) and Deserving(virgilio) and forall x (Seaborne(x) and Deserving(x) -> Labial(x)) -> therefore Labial(virgilio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Kacy is enumerable. Kacy is choleraic. Kacy is eponymous. Carter is enumerable. Marnie is not enumerable. Marnie is rachitic. Maegan is mercurous. All dulled, eponymous things are tacky. Green, eponymous things are dulled. Green things are eponymous. If Carter is eponymous and Carter is mercurous then Carter is dulled. Kind, mercurous things are rachitic. If something is mercurous and not eponymous then it is enumerable. If something is enumerable and eponymous then it is choleraic. If something is enumerable and not rachitic then it is choleraic. Marnie is tacky.", "logic": "\nEnumerable(kacy)\nCholeraic(kacy)\nEponymous(kacy)\nEnumerable(carter)\nnot Enumerable(marnie)\nRachitic(marnie)\nMercurous(maegan)\nforall x (Dulled(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Rachitic(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Dulled(x))\nforall x (Rachitic(x) -> Eponymous(x))\nEponymous(carter) and Mercurous(carter) -> Dulled(carter)\nforall x (Eponymous(x) and Mercurous(x) -> Rachitic(x))\nforall x (Mercurous(x) and not Eponymous(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Enumerable(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Choleraic(x))\nforall x (Enumerable(x) and not Rachitic(x) -> Choleraic(x))\n\nTacky(marnie)\n\nRachitic(marnie) and forall x (Rachitic(x) -> Eponymous(x)) -> therefore Eponymous(marnie) Rachitic(marnie) and Eponymous(marnie) and forall x (Rachitic(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Dulled(x)) -> therefore Dulled(marnie) Rachitic(marnie) and forall x (Rachitic(x) -> Eponymous(x)) -> therefore Eponymous(marnie) Dulled(marnie) and Eponymous(marnie) and forall x (Dulled(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Tacky(x)) -> therefore Tacky(marnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Dorolisa is revised. Dorolisa is abdominous. Dorolisa is heatable. Norrie is revised. Alphonse is not revised. Alphonse is aerophilic. Ignace is incurable. All refractive, heatable things are quelled. Green, heatable things are refractive. Green things are heatable. If Norrie is heatable and Norrie is incurable then Norrie is refractive. Kind, incurable things are aerophilic. If something is incurable and not heatable then it is revised. If something is revised and heatable then it is abdominous. If something is revised and not aerophilic then it is abdominous. Alphonse is not quelled.", "logic": "\nRevised(dorolisa)\nAbdominous(dorolisa)\nHeatable(dorolisa)\nRevised(norrie)\nnot Revised(alphonse)\nAerophilic(alphonse)\nIncurable(ignace)\nforall x (Refractive(x) and Heatable(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) and Heatable(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Heatable(x))\nHeatable(norrie) and Incurable(norrie) -> Refractive(norrie)\nforall x (Heatable(x) and Incurable(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nforall x (Incurable(x) and not Heatable(x) -> Revised(x))\nforall x (Revised(x) and Heatable(x) -> Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Revised(x) and not Aerophilic(x) -> Abdominous(x))\n\nnot Quelled(alphonse)\n\nAerophilic(alphonse) and forall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Heatable(x)) -> therefore Heatable(alphonse) Aerophilic(alphonse) and Heatable(alphonse) and forall x (Aerophilic(x) and Heatable(x) -> Refractive(x)) -> therefore Refractive(alphonse) Aerophilic(alphonse) and forall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Heatable(x)) -> therefore Heatable(alphonse) Refractive(alphonse) and Heatable(alphonse) and forall x (Refractive(x) and Heatable(x) -> Quelled(x)) -> therefore Quelled(alphonse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Vikkie is violated. Vikkie is maidenlike. Vikkie is heedless. Milly is violated. Genevieve is not violated. Genevieve is lxxvii. Emeline is veridical. All venturous, heedless things are outmost. Green, heedless things are venturous. Green things are heedless. If Milly is heedless and Milly is veridical then Milly is venturous. Kind, veridical things are lxxvii. If something is veridical and not heedless then it is violated. If something is violated and heedless then it is maidenlike. If something is violated and not lxxvii then it is maidenlike. Emeline is not outmost.", "logic": "\nViolated(vikkie)\nMaidenlike(vikkie)\nHeedless(vikkie)\nViolated(milly)\nnot Violated(genevieve)\nLxxvii(genevieve)\nVeridical(emeline)\nforall x (Venturous(x) and Heedless(x) -> Outmost(x))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) and Heedless(x) -> Venturous(x))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Heedless(x))\nHeedless(milly) and Veridical(milly) -> Venturous(milly)\nforall x (Heedless(x) and Veridical(x) -> Lxxvii(x))\nforall x (Veridical(x) and not Heedless(x) -> Violated(x))\nforall x (Violated(x) and Heedless(x) -> Maidenlike(x))\nforall x (Violated(x) and not Lxxvii(x) -> Maidenlike(x))\n\nnot Outmost(emeline)\n\nforall x (Venturous(x) and Heedless(x) -> Outmost(x)) <- forall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Heedless(x)) <- forall x (Heedless(x) and Veridical(x) -> Lxxvii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Koressa is biggish. Koressa is childish. Koressa is charmed. Alford is biggish. Taddeo is not biggish. Taddeo is foolhardy. Honey is hypodermic. All barebacked, charmed things are interested. Green, charmed things are barebacked. Green things are charmed. If Alford is charmed and Alford is hypodermic then Alford is barebacked. Kind, hypodermic things are foolhardy. If something is hypodermic and not charmed then it is biggish. If something is biggish and charmed then it is childish. If something is biggish and not foolhardy then it is childish. Honey is childish.", "logic": "\nBiggish(koressa)\nChildish(koressa)\nCharmed(koressa)\nBiggish(alford)\nnot Biggish(taddeo)\nFoolhardy(taddeo)\nHypodermic(honey)\nforall x (Barebacked(x) and Charmed(x) -> Interested(x))\nforall x (Foolhardy(x) and Charmed(x) -> Barebacked(x))\nforall x (Foolhardy(x) -> Charmed(x))\nCharmed(alford) and Hypodermic(alford) -> Barebacked(alford)\nforall x (Charmed(x) and Hypodermic(x) -> Foolhardy(x))\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) and not Charmed(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) and Charmed(x) -> Childish(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) and not Foolhardy(x) -> Childish(x))\n\nChildish(honey)\n\nforall x (Biggish(x) and Charmed(x) -> Childish(x)) <- forall x (Hypodermic(x) and not Charmed(x) -> Biggish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Hagan is driven. Hagan is metatarsal. Hagan is septal. Tate is driven. Dosi is not driven. Dosi is blockading. Petronia is ergodic. All bottomed, septal things are leeward. Green, septal things are bottomed. Green things are septal. If Tate is septal and Tate is ergodic then Tate is bottomed. Kind, ergodic things are blockading. If something is ergodic and not septal then it is driven. If something is driven and septal then it is metatarsal. If something is driven and not blockading then it is metatarsal. Petronia is not blockading.", "logic": "\nDriven(hagan)\nMetatarsal(hagan)\nSeptal(hagan)\nDriven(tate)\nnot Driven(dosi)\nBlockading(dosi)\nErgodic(petronia)\nforall x (Bottomed(x) and Septal(x) -> Leeward(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Septal(x) -> Bottomed(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) -> Septal(x))\nSeptal(tate) and Ergodic(tate) -> Bottomed(tate)\nforall x (Septal(x) and Ergodic(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Ergodic(x) and not Septal(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Septal(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and not Blockading(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\n\nnot Blockading(petronia)\n\nforall x (Septal(x) and Ergodic(x) -> Blockading(x)) <- forall x (Blockading(x) -> Septal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Ferdy is lowered. Ferdy is alcoholic. Ferdy is amethyst. Lola is lowered. Cathyleen is not lowered. Cathyleen is chaldean. Linette is estuarine. All validated, amethyst things are molal. Green, amethyst things are validated. Green things are amethyst. If Lola is amethyst and Lola is estuarine then Lola is validated. Kind, estuarine things are chaldean. If something is estuarine and not amethyst then it is lowered. If something is lowered and amethyst then it is alcoholic. If something is lowered and not chaldean then it is alcoholic. Lola is chaldean.", "logic": "\nLowered(ferdy)\nAlcoholic(ferdy)\nAmethyst(ferdy)\nLowered(lola)\nnot Lowered(cathyleen)\nChaldean(cathyleen)\nEstuarine(linette)\nforall x (Validated(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Chaldean(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Validated(x))\nforall x (Chaldean(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nAmethyst(lola) and Estuarine(lola) -> Validated(lola)\nforall x (Amethyst(x) and Estuarine(x) -> Chaldean(x))\nforall x (Estuarine(x) and not Amethyst(x) -> Lowered(x))\nforall x (Lowered(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Alcoholic(x))\nforall x (Lowered(x) and not Chaldean(x) -> Alcoholic(x))\n\nChaldean(lola)\n\nforall x (Amethyst(x) and Estuarine(x) -> Chaldean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Zarla is aroused. Zarla is faddish. Zarla is straw. Ivie is aroused. Marysa is not aroused. Marysa is auburn. Thibaud is rectal. All syntactic, straw things are ambrosian. Green, straw things are syntactic. Green things are straw. If Ivie is straw and Ivie is rectal then Ivie is syntactic. Kind, rectal things are auburn. If something is rectal and not straw then it is aroused. If something is aroused and straw then it is faddish. If something is aroused and not auburn then it is faddish. Ivie is not rectal.", "logic": "\nAroused(zarla)\nFaddish(zarla)\nStraw(zarla)\nAroused(ivie)\nnot Aroused(marysa)\nAuburn(marysa)\nRectal(thibaud)\nforall x (Syntactic(x) and Straw(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Auburn(x) and Straw(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Auburn(x) -> Straw(x))\nStraw(ivie) and Rectal(ivie) -> Syntactic(ivie)\nforall x (Straw(x) and Rectal(x) -> Auburn(x))\nforall x (Rectal(x) and not Straw(x) -> Aroused(x))\nforall x (Aroused(x) and Straw(x) -> Faddish(x))\nforall x (Aroused(x) and not Auburn(x) -> Faddish(x))\n\nnot Rectal(ivie)\n\nnot Rectal(ivie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Maribeth is brambly. Maribeth is burnished. Maribeth is welfarist. Rochelle is brambly. Kasey is not brambly. Kasey is nosed. Sela is enigmatic. All mucinoid, welfarist things are groomed. Green, welfarist things are mucinoid. Green things are welfarist. If Rochelle is welfarist and Rochelle is enigmatic then Rochelle is mucinoid. Kind, enigmatic things are nosed. If something is enigmatic and not welfarist then it is brambly. If something is brambly and welfarist then it is burnished. If something is brambly and not nosed then it is burnished. Kasey is enigmatic.", "logic": "\nBrambly(maribeth)\nBurnished(maribeth)\nWelfarist(maribeth)\nBrambly(rochelle)\nnot Brambly(kasey)\nNosed(kasey)\nEnigmatic(sela)\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) and Welfarist(x) -> Groomed(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) and Welfarist(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Welfarist(x))\nWelfarist(rochelle) and Enigmatic(rochelle) -> Mucinoid(rochelle)\nforall x (Welfarist(x) and Enigmatic(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) and not Welfarist(x) -> Brambly(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) and Welfarist(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) and not Nosed(x) -> Burnished(x))\n\nEnigmatic(kasey)\n\nEnigmatic(kasey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Judah is bisexual. Judah is zymoid. Judah is nonrandom. Kaja is gigantic. Ivy is not gigantic. Helyn is bisexual. Helyn is trivial. All trivial, nonrandom people are unseamed. Kind, nonrandom people are trivial. All trivial, unseamed people are concurring. Ivy is not gigantic.", "logic": "\nBisexual(judah)\nZymoid(judah)\nNonrandom(judah)\nGigantic(kaja)\nnot Gigantic(ivy)\nBisexual(helyn)\nTrivial(helyn)\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Nonrandom(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) and Nonrandom(x) -> Trivial(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Unseamed(x) -> Concurring(x))\n\nnot Gigantic(ivy)\n\ntherefore not Gigantic(ivy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Bart is occupied. Bart is favored. Bart is lasting. Norman is unsubtle. Alaine is not unsubtle. Catha is occupied. Catha is antitumour. All antitumour, lasting people are putrescent. Kind, lasting people are antitumour. All antitumour, putrescent people are thriftless. Bart is not occupied.", "logic": "\nOccupied(bart)\nFavored(bart)\nLasting(bart)\nUnsubtle(norman)\nnot Unsubtle(alaine)\nOccupied(catha)\nAntitumour(catha)\nforall x (Antitumour(x) and Lasting(x) -> Putrescent(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) and Lasting(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) and Putrescent(x) -> Thriftless(x))\n\nnot Occupied(bart)\n\ntherefore Occupied(bart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Fons is lamenting. Fons is neritic. Fons is excitative. Kayle is northward. Dedra is not northward. Brandise is lamenting. Brandise is goodish. All goodish, excitative people are dighted. Kind, excitative people are goodish. All goodish, dighted people are engraved. Fons is goodish.", "logic": "\nLamenting(fons)\nNeritic(fons)\nExcitative(fons)\nNorthward(kayle)\nnot Northward(dedra)\nLamenting(brandise)\nGoodish(brandise)\nforall x (Goodish(x) and Excitative(x) -> Dighted(x))\nforall x (Lamenting(x) and Excitative(x) -> Goodish(x))\nforall x (Goodish(x) and Dighted(x) -> Engraved(x))\n\nGoodish(fons)\n\nLamenting(fons) and Excitative(fons) and forall x (Lamenting(x) and Excitative(x) -> Goodish(x)) -> therefore Goodish(fons)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Emmet is nigerien. Emmet is tautologic. Emmet is urban. Jacquette is unobliging. Catharina is not unobliging. Staford is nigerien. Staford is dicky. All dicky, urban people are impervious. Kind, urban people are dicky. All dicky, impervious people are ennobling. Emmet is not dicky.", "logic": "\nNigerien(emmet)\nTautologic(emmet)\nUrban(emmet)\nUnobliging(jacquette)\nnot Unobliging(catharina)\nNigerien(staford)\nDicky(staford)\nforall x (Dicky(x) and Urban(x) -> Impervious(x))\nforall x (Nigerien(x) and Urban(x) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) and Impervious(x) -> Ennobling(x))\n\nnot Dicky(emmet)\n\nNigerien(emmet) and Urban(emmet) and forall x (Nigerien(x) and Urban(x) -> Dicky(x)) -> therefore Dicky(emmet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Quinta is sidelong. Quinta is dizzy. Quinta is unflavored. Hassan is amicable. Wilbur is not amicable. Luna is sidelong. Luna is cowardly. All cowardly, unflavored people are preferred. Kind, unflavored people are cowardly. All cowardly, preferred people are untruthful. Quinta is preferred.", "logic": "\nSidelong(quinta)\nDizzy(quinta)\nUnflavored(quinta)\nAmicable(hassan)\nnot Amicable(wilbur)\nSidelong(luna)\nCowardly(luna)\nforall x (Cowardly(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Preferred(x))\nforall x (Sidelong(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Cowardly(x))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) and Preferred(x) -> Untruthful(x))\n\nPreferred(quinta)\n\nSidelong(quinta) and Unflavored(quinta) and forall x (Sidelong(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Cowardly(x)) -> therefore Cowardly(quinta) Cowardly(quinta) and Unflavored(quinta) and forall x (Cowardly(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Preferred(x)) -> therefore Preferred(quinta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Will is inhuman. Will is hesitating. Will is alate. Dian is collegial. Jacques is not collegial. Valentine is inhuman. Valentine is bindable. All bindable, alate people are spread. Kind, alate people are bindable. All bindable, spread people are undamaged. Will is not spread.", "logic": "\nInhuman(will)\nHesitating(will)\nAlate(will)\nCollegial(dian)\nnot Collegial(jacques)\nInhuman(valentine)\nBindable(valentine)\nforall x (Bindable(x) and Alate(x) -> Spread(x))\nforall x (Inhuman(x) and Alate(x) -> Bindable(x))\nforall x (Bindable(x) and Spread(x) -> Undamaged(x))\n\nnot Spread(will)\n\nInhuman(will) and Alate(will) and forall x (Inhuman(x) and Alate(x) -> Bindable(x)) -> therefore Bindable(will) Bindable(will) and Alate(will) and forall x (Bindable(x) and Alate(x) -> Spread(x)) -> therefore Spread(will)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Leticia is boisterous. Leticia is razed. Leticia is impeccant. Wakefield is cheeky. Harvey is not cheeky. Ilene is boisterous. Ilene is impuissant. All impuissant, impeccant people are pureblood. Kind, impeccant people are impuissant. All impuissant, pureblood people are extramural. Leticia is extramural.", "logic": "\nBoisterous(leticia)\nRazed(leticia)\nImpeccant(leticia)\nCheeky(wakefield)\nnot Cheeky(harvey)\nBoisterous(ilene)\nImpuissant(ilene)\nforall x (Impuissant(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Pureblood(x))\nforall x (Boisterous(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Impuissant(x) and Pureblood(x) -> Extramural(x))\n\nExtramural(leticia)\n\nBoisterous(leticia) and Impeccant(leticia) and forall x (Boisterous(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Impuissant(x)) -> therefore Impuissant(leticia) Boisterous(leticia) and Impeccant(leticia) and forall x (Boisterous(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Impuissant(x)) -> therefore Impuissant(leticia) Impuissant(leticia) and Impeccant(leticia) and forall x (Impuissant(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Pureblood(x)) -> therefore Pureblood(leticia) Impuissant(leticia) and Pureblood(leticia) and forall x (Impuissant(x) and Pureblood(x) -> Extramural(x)) -> therefore Extramural(leticia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Donetta is splenic. Donetta is fallible. Donetta is coltish. Cammie is bestial. Rebekah is not bestial. Geralda is splenic. Geralda is shameful. All shameful, coltish people are untold. Kind, coltish people are shameful. All shameful, untold people are hammy. Donetta is not hammy.", "logic": "\nSplenic(donetta)\nFallible(donetta)\nColtish(donetta)\nBestial(cammie)\nnot Bestial(rebekah)\nSplenic(geralda)\nShameful(geralda)\nforall x (Shameful(x) and Coltish(x) -> Untold(x))\nforall x (Splenic(x) and Coltish(x) -> Shameful(x))\nforall x (Shameful(x) and Untold(x) -> Hammy(x))\n\nnot Hammy(donetta)\n\nSplenic(donetta) and Coltish(donetta) and forall x (Splenic(x) and Coltish(x) -> Shameful(x)) -> therefore Shameful(donetta) Splenic(donetta) and Coltish(donetta) and forall x (Splenic(x) and Coltish(x) -> Shameful(x)) -> therefore Shameful(donetta) Shameful(donetta) and Coltish(donetta) and forall x (Shameful(x) and Coltish(x) -> Untold(x)) -> therefore Untold(donetta) Shameful(donetta) and Untold(donetta) and forall x (Shameful(x) and Untold(x) -> Hammy(x)) -> therefore Hammy(donetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Dione is untenanted. Dione is analytic. Dione is eastside. Dione is percipient. Jonah is not percipient. Cassy is untenanted. Cassy is forlorn. All forlorn, eastside people are diligent. Kind, eastside people are forlorn. All forlorn, diligent people are epochal. Cassy is not diligent.", "logic": "\nUntenanted(dione)\nAnalytic(dione)\nEastside(dione)\nPercipient(dione)\nnot Percipient(jonah)\nUntenanted(cassy)\nForlorn(cassy)\nforall x (Forlorn(x) and Eastside(x) -> Diligent(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) and Eastside(x) -> Forlorn(x))\nforall x (Forlorn(x) and Diligent(x) -> Epochal(x))\n\nnot Diligent(cassy)\n\nforall x (Forlorn(x) and Eastside(x) -> Diligent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Elihu is available. Elihu is viricidal. Elihu is beseeching. Delphina is bubbling. Gay is not bubbling. Emmery is available. Emmery is underwater. All underwater, beseeching people are washy. Kind, beseeching people are underwater. All underwater, washy people are deathly. Delphina is underwater.", "logic": "\nAvailable(elihu)\nViricidal(elihu)\nBeseeching(elihu)\nBubbling(delphina)\nnot Bubbling(gay)\nAvailable(emmery)\nUnderwater(emmery)\nforall x (Underwater(x) and Beseeching(x) -> Washy(x))\nforall x (Available(x) and Beseeching(x) -> Underwater(x))\nforall x (Underwater(x) and Washy(x) -> Deathly(x))\n\nUnderwater(delphina)\n\nforall x (Available(x) and Beseeching(x) -> Underwater(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Bobine is gone. Bobine is arawakan. Bobine is pestering. Jilli is sectarian. Moira is not sectarian. Timotheus is gone. Timotheus is nuts. All nuts, pestering people are imbecilic. Kind, pestering people are nuts. All nuts, imbecilic people are indiscrete. Jilli is not indiscrete.", "logic": "\nGone(bobine)\nArawakan(bobine)\nPestering(bobine)\nSectarian(jilli)\nnot Sectarian(moira)\nGone(timotheus)\nNuts(timotheus)\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Pestering(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) and Pestering(x) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Imbecilic(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\n\nnot Indiscrete(jilli)\n\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Imbecilic(x) -> Indiscrete(x)) <- forall x (Gone(x) and Pestering(x) -> Nuts(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Dorena is cherubic. Dorena is symbolic. Dorena is adactylous. Ruddie is unobliging. Johannah is not unobliging. Jacky is cherubic. Jacky is intruding. All intruding, adactylous people are brassy. Kind, adactylous people are intruding. All intruding, brassy people are actable. Jacky is actable.", "logic": "\nCherubic(dorena)\nSymbolic(dorena)\nAdactylous(dorena)\nUnobliging(ruddie)\nnot Unobliging(johannah)\nCherubic(jacky)\nIntruding(jacky)\nforall x (Intruding(x) and Adactylous(x) -> Brassy(x))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) and Adactylous(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Intruding(x) and Brassy(x) -> Actable(x))\n\nActable(jacky)\n\nforall x (Intruding(x) and Brassy(x) -> Actable(x)) <- forall x (Intruding(x) and Adactylous(x) -> Brassy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Etti is alkaloidal. Etti is complete. Etti is palish. West is pierced. Imojean is not pierced. Shawnee is alkaloidal. Shawnee is fallible. All fallible, palish people are spellbound. Kind, palish people are fallible. All fallible, spellbound people are unasked. West is not alkaloidal.", "logic": "\nAlkaloidal(etti)\nComplete(etti)\nPalish(etti)\nPierced(west)\nnot Pierced(imojean)\nAlkaloidal(shawnee)\nFallible(shawnee)\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Palish(x) -> Spellbound(x))\nforall x (Alkaloidal(x) and Palish(x) -> Fallible(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Spellbound(x) -> Unasked(x))\n\nnot Alkaloidal(west)\n\nnot Alkaloidal(west) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Melamie is unsatiated. Melamie is gusseted. Melamie is meridian. Alexi is tetchy. Cathee is not tetchy. Hilliary is unsatiated. Hilliary is noncausal. All noncausal, meridian people are beady. Kind, meridian people are noncausal. All noncausal, beady people are overshot. Cathee is gusseted.", "logic": "\nUnsatiated(melamie)\nGusseted(melamie)\nMeridian(melamie)\nTetchy(alexi)\nnot Tetchy(cathee)\nUnsatiated(hilliary)\nNoncausal(hilliary)\nforall x (Noncausal(x) and Meridian(x) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) and Meridian(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) and Beady(x) -> Overshot(x))\n\nGusseted(cathee)\n\nGusseted(cathee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Sonni is hooflike. Sonni is venereal. Sonni is impatient. Apollo is demanding. Sander is not demanding. Dorothee is hooflike. Dorothee is more. All more, impatient people are oecumenic. Kind, impatient people are more. All more, oecumenic people are disclike. Dorothee is not impatient.", "logic": "\nHooflike(sonni)\nVenereal(sonni)\nImpatient(sonni)\nDemanding(apollo)\nnot Demanding(sander)\nHooflike(dorothee)\nMore(dorothee)\nforall x (More(x) and Impatient(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and Impatient(x) -> More(x))\nforall x (More(x) and Oecumenic(x) -> Disclike(x))\n\nnot Impatient(dorothee)\n\nnot Impatient(dorothee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Franklin is mercenary. Franklin is right. Franklin is ramose. Erny is squirting. Bettie is not squirting. Wendi is mercenary. Wendi is acerb. All acerb, ramose people are maimed. Kind, ramose people are acerb. All acerb, maimed people are maltreated. Bettie is mercenary.", "logic": "\nMercenary(franklin)\nRight(franklin)\nRamose(franklin)\nSquirting(erny)\nnot Squirting(bettie)\nMercenary(wendi)\nAcerb(wendi)\nforall x (Acerb(x) and Ramose(x) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Mercenary(x) and Ramose(x) -> Acerb(x))\nforall x (Acerb(x) and Maimed(x) -> Maltreated(x))\n\nMercenary(bettie)\n\nMercenary(bettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Stafford is logistical. All logistical people are steely. Rough, fusiform people are not steely. Green, steely people are fusiform. If someone is unimposing and not logistical then they are elliptical. All steely people are elliptical. If Stafford is elliptical then Stafford is fusiform. Stafford is logistical.", "logic": "\nLogistical(stafford)\nforall x (Logistical(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Exilic(x) and Fusiform(x) -> not Steely(x))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) and Steely(x) -> Fusiform(x))\nforall x (Unimposing(x) and not Logistical(x) -> Elliptical(x))\nforall x (Steely(x) -> Elliptical(x))\nElliptical(stafford) -> Fusiform(stafford)\n\nLogistical(stafford)\n\ntherefore Logistical(stafford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Tamar is otherwise. All otherwise people are shaggy. Rough, asynergic people are not shaggy. Green, shaggy people are asynergic. If someone is jilted and not otherwise then they are capacitive. All shaggy people are capacitive. If Tamar is capacitive then Tamar is asynergic. Tamar is not otherwise.", "logic": "\nOtherwise(tamar)\nforall x (Otherwise(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and Asynergic(x) -> not Shaggy(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) and Shaggy(x) -> Asynergic(x))\nforall x (Jilted(x) and not Otherwise(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nforall x (Shaggy(x) -> Capacitive(x))\nCapacitive(tamar) -> Asynergic(tamar)\n\nnot Otherwise(tamar)\n\ntherefore Otherwise(tamar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Madlin is oracular. All oracular people are unplanted. Rough, paroicous people are not unplanted. Green, unplanted people are paroicous. If someone is pappose and not oracular then they are draughty. All unplanted people are draughty. If Madlin is draughty then Madlin is paroicous. Madlin is unplanted.", "logic": "\nOracular(madlin)\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Unplanted(x))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) and Paroicous(x) -> not Unplanted(x))\nforall x (Draughty(x) and Unplanted(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Pappose(x) and not Oracular(x) -> Draughty(x))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> Draughty(x))\nDraughty(madlin) -> Paroicous(madlin)\n\nUnplanted(madlin)\n\nOracular(madlin) and forall x (Oracular(x) -> Unplanted(x)) -> therefore Unplanted(madlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Nan is homesick. All homesick people are frangible. Rough, bistred people are not frangible. Green, frangible people are bistred. If someone is creaseless and not homesick then they are toiling. All frangible people are toiling. If Nan is toiling then Nan is bistred. Nan is not frangible.", "logic": "\nHomesick(nan)\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Frangible(x))\nforall x (Adorned(x) and Bistred(x) -> not Frangible(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Frangible(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) and not Homesick(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Toiling(x))\nToiling(nan) -> Bistred(nan)\n\nnot Frangible(nan)\n\nHomesick(nan) and forall x (Homesick(x) -> Frangible(x)) -> therefore Frangible(nan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Frederik is overblown. All overblown people are syntactic. Rough, viewable people are not syntactic. Green, syntactic people are viewable. If someone is explicit and not overblown then they are expedient. All syntactic people are expedient. If Frederik is expedient then Frederik is viewable. Frederik is expedient.", "logic": "\nOverblown(frederik)\nforall x (Overblown(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) and Viewable(x) -> not Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) and Syntactic(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Explicit(x) and not Overblown(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) -> Expedient(x))\nExpedient(frederik) -> Viewable(frederik)\n\nExpedient(frederik)\n\nOverblown(frederik) and forall x (Overblown(x) -> Syntactic(x)) -> therefore Syntactic(frederik) Syntactic(frederik) and forall x (Syntactic(x) -> Expedient(x)) -> therefore Expedient(frederik)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Lolly is zygotic. All zygotic people are extensile. Rough, choleric people are not extensile. Green, extensile people are choleric. If someone is masterless and not zygotic then they are overactive. All extensile people are overactive. If Lolly is overactive then Lolly is choleric. Lolly is not overactive.", "logic": "\nZygotic(lolly)\nforall x (Zygotic(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) and Choleric(x) -> not Extensile(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Extensile(x) -> Choleric(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) and not Zygotic(x) -> Overactive(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) -> Overactive(x))\nOveractive(lolly) -> Choleric(lolly)\n\nnot Overactive(lolly)\n\nZygotic(lolly) and forall x (Zygotic(x) -> Extensile(x)) -> therefore Extensile(lolly) Extensile(lolly) and forall x (Extensile(x) -> Overactive(x)) -> therefore Overactive(lolly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Mercie is cosmetic. All cosmetic people are superlunar. Rough, ominous people are not superlunar. Green, superlunar people are ominous. If someone is uncovered and not cosmetic then they are vesical. All superlunar people are vesical. If Mercie is vesical then Mercie is ominous. Mercie is ominous.", "logic": "\nCosmetic(mercie)\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) -> Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) and Ominous(x) -> not Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Vesical(x) and Superlunar(x) -> Ominous(x))\nforall x (Uncovered(x) and not Cosmetic(x) -> Vesical(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Vesical(x))\nVesical(mercie) -> Ominous(mercie)\n\nOminous(mercie)\n\nCosmetic(mercie) and forall x (Cosmetic(x) -> Superlunar(x)) -> therefore Superlunar(mercie) Superlunar(mercie) and forall x (Superlunar(x) -> Vesical(x)) -> therefore Vesical(mercie) Vesical(mercie) and Vesical(mercie) -> Ominous(mercie) -> therefore Ominous(mercie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Kamila is incurable. All incurable people are apiculate. Rough, sanitary people are not apiculate. Green, apiculate people are sanitary. If someone is running and not incurable then they are nullified. All apiculate people are nullified. If Kamila is nullified then Kamila is sanitary. Kamila is not sanitary.", "logic": "\nIncurable(kamila)\nforall x (Incurable(x) -> Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Silty(x) and Sanitary(x) -> not Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Nullified(x) and Apiculate(x) -> Sanitary(x))\nforall x (Running(x) and not Incurable(x) -> Nullified(x))\nforall x (Apiculate(x) -> Nullified(x))\nNullified(kamila) -> Sanitary(kamila)\n\nnot Sanitary(kamila)\n\nIncurable(kamila) and forall x (Incurable(x) -> Apiculate(x)) -> therefore Apiculate(kamila) Apiculate(kamila) and forall x (Apiculate(x) -> Nullified(x)) -> therefore Nullified(kamila) Nullified(kamila) and Nullified(kamila) -> Sanitary(kamila) -> therefore Sanitary(kamila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Miriam is agog. All agog people are rosy. Rough, spartan people are not rosy. Green, rosy people are spartan. If someone is ostensible and not agog then they are floating. All rosy people are floating. If Miriam is floating then Miriam is spartan. Miriam is not blue.", "logic": "\nAgog(miriam)\nforall x (Agog(x) -> Rosy(x))\nforall x (Deft(x) and Spartan(x) -> not Rosy(x))\nforall x (Floating(x) and Rosy(x) -> Spartan(x))\nforall x (Ostensible(x) and not Agog(x) -> Floating(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) -> Floating(x))\nFloating(miriam) -> Spartan(miriam)\n\nnot Blue(miriam)\n\nnot Blue(miriam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Matti is henpecked. All henpecked people are implicated. Rough, uncarved people are not implicated. Green, implicated people are uncarved. If someone is unsanitary and not henpecked then they are leglike. All implicated people are leglike. If Matti is leglike then Matti is uncarved. Matti is unsanitary.", "logic": "\nHenpecked(matti)\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Implicated(x))\nforall x (Correlate(x) and Uncarved(x) -> not Implicated(x))\nforall x (Leglike(x) and Implicated(x) -> Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) and not Henpecked(x) -> Leglike(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Leglike(x))\nLeglike(matti) -> Uncarved(matti)\n\nUnsanitary(matti)\n\nUnsanitary(matti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Megan is razorback. Megan is mettlesome. Megan is unwashed. Megan is codified. Rudd is spinal. Rudd is eminent. Rudd is vicious. Rudd is unwashed. Rudd is codified. Eda is spinal. Eda is vicious. Eda is codified. Aguste is razorback. Aguste is mettlesome. Aguste is unwashed. All eminent people are vicious. Smart, mettlesome people are eminent. All razorback people are codified. Aguste is mettlesome.", "logic": "\nRazorback(megan)\nMettlesome(megan)\nUnwashed(megan)\nCodified(megan)\nSpinal(rudd)\nEminent(rudd)\nVicious(rudd)\nUnwashed(rudd)\nCodified(rudd)\nSpinal(eda)\nVicious(eda)\nCodified(eda)\nRazorback(aguste)\nMettlesome(aguste)\nUnwashed(aguste)\nforall x (Eminent(x) -> Vicious(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) and Mettlesome(x) -> Eminent(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) -> Codified(x))\n\nMettlesome(aguste)\n\ntherefore Mettlesome(aguste)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Merrick is uncrowded. Merrick is loamless. Merrick is narrowed. Merrick is closed. Samson is behindhand. Samson is perfervid. Samson is latter. Samson is narrowed. Samson is closed. Englebart is behindhand. Englebart is latter. Englebart is closed. Talbot is uncrowded. Talbot is loamless. Talbot is narrowed. All perfervid people are latter. Smart, loamless people are perfervid. All uncrowded people are closed. Englebart is not behindhand.", "logic": "\nUncrowded(merrick)\nLoamless(merrick)\nNarrowed(merrick)\nClosed(merrick)\nBehindhand(samson)\nPerfervid(samson)\nLatter(samson)\nNarrowed(samson)\nClosed(samson)\nBehindhand(englebart)\nLatter(englebart)\nClosed(englebart)\nUncrowded(talbot)\nLoamless(talbot)\nNarrowed(talbot)\nforall x (Perfervid(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) and Loamless(x) -> Perfervid(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> Closed(x))\n\nnot Behindhand(englebart)\n\ntherefore Behindhand(englebart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Gisella is classy. Gisella is nonuple. Gisella is cloggy. Gisella is dystopian. Luna is rainproof. Luna is ovate. Luna is aphoristic. Luna is cloggy. Luna is dystopian. Vivienne is rainproof. Vivienne is aphoristic. Vivienne is dystopian. Hermione is classy. Hermione is nonuple. Hermione is cloggy. All ovate people are aphoristic. Smart, nonuple people are ovate. All classy people are dystopian. Hermione is dystopian.", "logic": "\nClassy(gisella)\nNonuple(gisella)\nCloggy(gisella)\nDystopian(gisella)\nRainproof(luna)\nOvate(luna)\nAphoristic(luna)\nCloggy(luna)\nDystopian(luna)\nRainproof(vivienne)\nAphoristic(vivienne)\nDystopian(vivienne)\nClassy(hermione)\nNonuple(hermione)\nCloggy(hermione)\nforall x (Ovate(x) -> Aphoristic(x))\nforall x (Dystopian(x) and Nonuple(x) -> Ovate(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) -> Dystopian(x))\n\nDystopian(hermione)\n\nClassy(hermione) and forall x (Classy(x) -> Dystopian(x)) -> therefore Dystopian(hermione)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Town is noticeable. Town is disorderly. Town is uncapped. Town is unfair. Sven is expanded. Sven is decreasing. Sven is acronymic. Sven is uncapped. Sven is unfair. Jimmie is expanded. Jimmie is acronymic. Jimmie is unfair. Caryn is noticeable. Caryn is disorderly. Caryn is uncapped. All decreasing people are acronymic. Smart, disorderly people are decreasing. All noticeable people are unfair. Town is not decreasing.", "logic": "\nNoticeable(town)\nDisorderly(town)\nUncapped(town)\nUnfair(town)\nExpanded(sven)\nDecreasing(sven)\nAcronymic(sven)\nUncapped(sven)\nUnfair(sven)\nExpanded(jimmie)\nAcronymic(jimmie)\nUnfair(jimmie)\nNoticeable(caryn)\nDisorderly(caryn)\nUncapped(caryn)\nforall x (Decreasing(x) -> Acronymic(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Disorderly(x) -> Decreasing(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Unfair(x))\n\nnot Decreasing(town)\n\nUnfair(town) and Disorderly(town) and forall x (Unfair(x) and Disorderly(x) -> Decreasing(x)) -> therefore Decreasing(town)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Vito is puberulent. Vito is genetic. Vito is unrifled. Vito is dissolved. Reeba is unmerited. Reeba is startled. Reeba is ageless. Reeba is unrifled. Reeba is dissolved. Whitby is unmerited. Whitby is ageless. Whitby is dissolved. Lynette is puberulent. Lynette is genetic. Lynette is unrifled. All startled people are ageless. Smart, genetic people are startled. All puberulent people are dissolved. Vito is ageless.", "logic": "\nPuberulent(vito)\nGenetic(vito)\nUnrifled(vito)\nDissolved(vito)\nUnmerited(reeba)\nStartled(reeba)\nAgeless(reeba)\nUnrifled(reeba)\nDissolved(reeba)\nUnmerited(whitby)\nAgeless(whitby)\nDissolved(whitby)\nPuberulent(lynette)\nGenetic(lynette)\nUnrifled(lynette)\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Dissolved(x) and Genetic(x) -> Startled(x))\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Dissolved(x))\n\nAgeless(vito)\n\nDissolved(vito) and Genetic(vito) and forall x (Dissolved(x) and Genetic(x) -> Startled(x)) -> therefore Startled(vito) Startled(vito) and forall x (Startled(x) -> Ageless(x)) -> therefore Ageless(vito)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Katlin is sixtieth. Katlin is mortuary. Katlin is duplicate. Katlin is oriental. Shelton is bulgarian. Shelton is guileless. Shelton is inertial. Shelton is duplicate. Shelton is oriental. Josef is bulgarian. Josef is inertial. Josef is oriental. Zerk is sixtieth. Zerk is mortuary. Zerk is duplicate. All guileless people are inertial. Smart, mortuary people are guileless. All sixtieth people are oriental. Katlin is not inertial.", "logic": "\nSixtieth(katlin)\nMortuary(katlin)\nDuplicate(katlin)\nOriental(katlin)\nBulgarian(shelton)\nGuileless(shelton)\nInertial(shelton)\nDuplicate(shelton)\nOriental(shelton)\nBulgarian(josef)\nInertial(josef)\nOriental(josef)\nSixtieth(zerk)\nMortuary(zerk)\nDuplicate(zerk)\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Oriental(x) and Mortuary(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Sixtieth(x) -> Oriental(x))\n\nnot Inertial(katlin)\n\nOriental(katlin) and Mortuary(katlin) and forall x (Oriental(x) and Mortuary(x) -> Guileless(x)) -> therefore Guileless(katlin) Guileless(katlin) and forall x (Guileless(x) -> Inertial(x)) -> therefore Inertial(katlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Camile is bitty. Camile is coruscant. Camile is unlocked. Camile is binuclear. Shandee is exalted. Shandee is xxvi. Shandee is poltroon. Shandee is unlocked. Shandee is binuclear. Siffre is exalted. Siffre is poltroon. Siffre is binuclear. Marita is bitty. Marita is coruscant. Marita is unlocked. All xxvi people are poltroon. Smart, coruscant people are xxvi. All bitty people are binuclear. Marita is poltroon.", "logic": "\nBitty(camile)\nCoruscant(camile)\nUnlocked(camile)\nBinuclear(camile)\nExalted(shandee)\nXxvi(shandee)\nPoltroon(shandee)\nUnlocked(shandee)\nBinuclear(shandee)\nExalted(siffre)\nPoltroon(siffre)\nBinuclear(siffre)\nBitty(marita)\nCoruscant(marita)\nUnlocked(marita)\nforall x (Xxvi(x) -> Poltroon(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and Coruscant(x) -> Xxvi(x))\nforall x (Bitty(x) -> Binuclear(x))\n\nPoltroon(marita)\n\nBitty(marita) and forall x (Bitty(x) -> Binuclear(x)) -> therefore Binuclear(marita) Binuclear(marita) and Coruscant(marita) and forall x (Binuclear(x) and Coruscant(x) -> Xxvi(x)) -> therefore Xxvi(marita) Xxvi(marita) and forall x (Xxvi(x) -> Poltroon(x)) -> therefore Poltroon(marita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Ezekiel is covariant. Ezekiel is autonomic. Ezekiel is creditable. Ezekiel is incoming. Xenos is spasmodic. Xenos is deciphered. Xenos is plutonic. Xenos is creditable. Xenos is incoming. Caresse is spasmodic. Caresse is plutonic. Caresse is incoming. Shannan is covariant. Shannan is autonomic. Shannan is creditable. All deciphered people are plutonic. Smart, autonomic people are deciphered. All covariant people are incoming. Shannan is not plutonic.", "logic": "\nCovariant(ezekiel)\nAutonomic(ezekiel)\nCreditable(ezekiel)\nIncoming(ezekiel)\nSpasmodic(xenos)\nDeciphered(xenos)\nPlutonic(xenos)\nCreditable(xenos)\nIncoming(xenos)\nSpasmodic(caresse)\nPlutonic(caresse)\nIncoming(caresse)\nCovariant(shannan)\nAutonomic(shannan)\nCreditable(shannan)\nforall x (Deciphered(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Incoming(x) and Autonomic(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) -> Incoming(x))\n\nnot Plutonic(shannan)\n\nCovariant(shannan) and forall x (Covariant(x) -> Incoming(x)) -> therefore Incoming(shannan) Incoming(shannan) and Autonomic(shannan) and forall x (Incoming(x) and Autonomic(x) -> Deciphered(x)) -> therefore Deciphered(shannan) Deciphered(shannan) and forall x (Deciphered(x) -> Plutonic(x)) -> therefore Plutonic(shannan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Joelynn is reluctant. Joelynn is rustling. Joelynn is basilary. Joelynn is ravaged. Normie is disyllabic. Normie is inaudible. Normie is osteal. Normie is basilary. Normie is ravaged. Robbin is disyllabic. Robbin is osteal. Robbin is ravaged. Leanne is reluctant. Leanne is rustling. Leanne is basilary. All inaudible people are osteal. Smart, rustling people are inaudible. All reluctant people are ravaged. Robbin is not inaudible.", "logic": "\nReluctant(joelynn)\nRustling(joelynn)\nBasilary(joelynn)\nRavaged(joelynn)\nDisyllabic(normie)\nInaudible(normie)\nOsteal(normie)\nBasilary(normie)\nRavaged(normie)\nDisyllabic(robbin)\nOsteal(robbin)\nRavaged(robbin)\nReluctant(leanne)\nRustling(leanne)\nBasilary(leanne)\nforall x (Inaudible(x) -> Osteal(x))\nforall x (Ravaged(x) and Rustling(x) -> Inaudible(x))\nforall x (Reluctant(x) -> Ravaged(x))\n\nnot Inaudible(robbin)\n\nforall x (Ravaged(x) and Rustling(x) -> Inaudible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Ursola is thespian. Ursola is textile. Ursola is nonimmune. Ursola is guttural. Babette is doctoral. Babette is repugnant. Babette is twinning. Babette is nonimmune. Babette is guttural. Marice is doctoral. Marice is twinning. Marice is guttural. Katleen is thespian. Katleen is textile. Katleen is nonimmune. All repugnant people are twinning. Smart, textile people are repugnant. All thespian people are guttural. Marice is nonimmune.", "logic": "\nThespian(ursola)\nTextile(ursola)\nNonimmune(ursola)\nGuttural(ursola)\nDoctoral(babette)\nRepugnant(babette)\nTwinning(babette)\nNonimmune(babette)\nGuttural(babette)\nDoctoral(marice)\nTwinning(marice)\nGuttural(marice)\nThespian(katleen)\nTextile(katleen)\nNonimmune(katleen)\nforall x (Repugnant(x) -> Twinning(x))\nforall x (Guttural(x) and Textile(x) -> Repugnant(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) -> Guttural(x))\n\nNonimmune(marice)\n\nNonimmune(marice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Rhonda is unwished. Rhonda is vague. Rhonda is casteless. Rhonda is christly. Francesca is hardcore. Francesca is soldierly. Francesca is shoreward. Francesca is casteless. Francesca is christly. Dionne is hardcore. Dionne is shoreward. Dionne is christly. Ariadne is unwished. Ariadne is vague. Ariadne is casteless. All soldierly people are shoreward. Smart, vague people are soldierly. All unwished people are christly. Dionne is not vague.", "logic": "\nUnwished(rhonda)\nVague(rhonda)\nCasteless(rhonda)\nChristly(rhonda)\nHardcore(francesca)\nSoldierly(francesca)\nShoreward(francesca)\nCasteless(francesca)\nChristly(francesca)\nHardcore(dionne)\nShoreward(dionne)\nChristly(dionne)\nUnwished(ariadne)\nVague(ariadne)\nCasteless(ariadne)\nforall x (Soldierly(x) -> Shoreward(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) and Vague(x) -> Soldierly(x))\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> Christly(x))\n\nnot Vague(dionne)\n\nnot Vague(dionne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Lorene is dickensian. Lorene is regular. Lorene is sapid. Lorene is shirty. Andi is spondaic. Andi is combustive. Andi is beseeching. Andi is sapid. Andi is shirty. Rodrigo is spondaic. Rodrigo is beseeching. Rodrigo is shirty. Natala is dickensian. Natala is regular. Natala is sapid. All combustive people are beseeching. Smart, regular people are combustive. All dickensian people are shirty. Andi is regular.", "logic": "\nDickensian(lorene)\nRegular(lorene)\nSapid(lorene)\nShirty(lorene)\nSpondaic(andi)\nCombustive(andi)\nBeseeching(andi)\nSapid(andi)\nShirty(andi)\nSpondaic(rodrigo)\nBeseeching(rodrigo)\nShirty(rodrigo)\nDickensian(natala)\nRegular(natala)\nSapid(natala)\nforall x (Combustive(x) -> Beseeching(x))\nforall x (Shirty(x) and Regular(x) -> Combustive(x))\nforall x (Dickensian(x) -> Shirty(x))\n\nRegular(andi)\n\nRegular(andi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Harwell is embolic. Harwell is bifid. Harwell is caucasoid. Harwell is standard. Portia is sybaritic. Portia is vague. Portia is horary. Portia is caucasoid. Portia is standard. Reena is sybaritic. Reena is horary. Reena is standard. Rodolfo is embolic. Rodolfo is bifid. Rodolfo is caucasoid. All vague people are horary. Smart, bifid people are vague. All embolic people are standard. Rodolfo is not sybaritic.", "logic": "\nEmbolic(harwell)\nBifid(harwell)\nCaucasoid(harwell)\nStandard(harwell)\nSybaritic(portia)\nVague(portia)\nHorary(portia)\nCaucasoid(portia)\nStandard(portia)\nSybaritic(reena)\nHorary(reena)\nStandard(reena)\nEmbolic(rodolfo)\nBifid(rodolfo)\nCaucasoid(rodolfo)\nforall x (Vague(x) -> Horary(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) and Bifid(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Embolic(x) -> Standard(x))\n\nnot Sybaritic(rodolfo)\n\nnot Sybaritic(rodolfo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Lorette is unclogged. Lorette is baneful. Lorette is monoatomic. Lorette is unmusical. Juana is auxetic. Juana is plumed. Juana is frequent. Juana is monoatomic. Juana is unmusical. Arturo is auxetic. Arturo is frequent. Arturo is unmusical. Pepe is unclogged. Pepe is baneful. Pepe is monoatomic. All plumed people are frequent. Smart, baneful people are plumed. All unclogged people are unmusical. Arturo is unclogged.", "logic": "\nUnclogged(lorette)\nBaneful(lorette)\nMonoatomic(lorette)\nUnmusical(lorette)\nAuxetic(juana)\nPlumed(juana)\nFrequent(juana)\nMonoatomic(juana)\nUnmusical(juana)\nAuxetic(arturo)\nFrequent(arturo)\nUnmusical(arturo)\nUnclogged(pepe)\nBaneful(pepe)\nMonoatomic(pepe)\nforall x (Plumed(x) -> Frequent(x))\nforall x (Unmusical(x) and Baneful(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Unclogged(x) -> Unmusical(x))\n\nUnclogged(arturo)\n\nUnclogged(arturo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Sheila is unskilled. Sheila is exigent. Sheila is deluxe. Sheila is jumbo. Eli is marbled. Eli is belated. Eli is gregarious. Eli is deluxe. Eli is jumbo. Witty is marbled. Witty is gregarious. Witty is jumbo. Fonsie is unskilled. Fonsie is exigent. Fonsie is deluxe. All belated people are gregarious. Smart, exigent people are belated. All unskilled people are jumbo. Eli is not unskilled.", "logic": "\nUnskilled(sheila)\nExigent(sheila)\nDeluxe(sheila)\nJumbo(sheila)\nMarbled(eli)\nBelated(eli)\nGregarious(eli)\nDeluxe(eli)\nJumbo(eli)\nMarbled(witty)\nGregarious(witty)\nJumbo(witty)\nUnskilled(fonsie)\nExigent(fonsie)\nDeluxe(fonsie)\nforall x (Belated(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Jumbo(x) and Exigent(x) -> Belated(x))\nforall x (Unskilled(x) -> Jumbo(x))\n\nnot Unskilled(eli)\n\nnot Unskilled(eli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Fiorenze is tasteful. Fiorenze is artistic. Fiorenze is noncaloric. Fiorenze is surgical. Francyne is detested. Francyne is coenobitic. Francyne is hempen. Francyne is noncaloric. Francyne is surgical. Marysa is detested. Marysa is hempen. Marysa is surgical. Nanni is tasteful. Nanni is artistic. Nanni is noncaloric. All coenobitic people are hempen. Smart, artistic people are coenobitic. All tasteful people are surgical. Fiorenze is detested.", "logic": "\nTasteful(fiorenze)\nArtistic(fiorenze)\nNoncaloric(fiorenze)\nSurgical(fiorenze)\nDetested(francyne)\nCoenobitic(francyne)\nHempen(francyne)\nNoncaloric(francyne)\nSurgical(francyne)\nDetested(marysa)\nHempen(marysa)\nSurgical(marysa)\nTasteful(nanni)\nArtistic(nanni)\nNoncaloric(nanni)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Surgical(x) and Artistic(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nforall x (Tasteful(x) -> Surgical(x))\n\nDetested(fiorenze)\n\nDetested(fiorenze) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Daveta is allotted. Daveta is aleatory. Daveta is inanimate. Trudey is austrian. Trudey is not pinched. Trudey is allotted. Trudey is aleatory. Trudey is not short. Trudey is grenadian. Mmarianne is austrian. Mmarianne is aleatory. Mmarianne is not short. If Mmarianne is inanimate and Mmarianne is aleatory then Mmarianne is pinched. Blue people are allotted. If someone is aleatory and not short then they are inanimate. Mmarianne is aleatory.", "logic": "\nAllotted(daveta)\nAleatory(daveta)\nInanimate(daveta)\nAustrian(trudey)\nnot Pinched(trudey)\nAllotted(trudey)\nAleatory(trudey)\nnot Short(trudey)\nGrenadian(trudey)\nAustrian(mmarianne)\nAleatory(mmarianne)\nnot Short(mmarianne)\nInanimate(mmarianne) and Aleatory(mmarianne) -> Pinched(mmarianne)\nforall x (Pinched(x) -> Allotted(x))\nforall x (Aleatory(x) and not Short(x) -> Inanimate(x))\n\nAleatory(mmarianne)\n\ntherefore Aleatory(mmarianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Tam is cavitied. Tam is cortical. Tam is clogged. Barton is pithy. Barton is not sloshed. Barton is cavitied. Barton is cortical. Barton is not saturated. Barton is ultra. Maren is pithy. Maren is cortical. Maren is not saturated. If Maren is clogged and Maren is cortical then Maren is sloshed. Blue people are cavitied. If someone is cortical and not saturated then they are clogged. Maren is not cortical.", "logic": "\nCavitied(tam)\nCortical(tam)\nClogged(tam)\nPithy(barton)\nnot Sloshed(barton)\nCavitied(barton)\nCortical(barton)\nnot Saturated(barton)\nUltra(barton)\nPithy(maren)\nCortical(maren)\nnot Saturated(maren)\nClogged(maren) and Cortical(maren) -> Sloshed(maren)\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Cortical(x) and not Saturated(x) -> Clogged(x))\n\nnot Cortical(maren)\n\ntherefore Cortical(maren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Perri is floored. Perri is ungathered. Perri is quondam. Debbie is parous. Debbie is not replete. Debbie is floored. Debbie is ungathered. Debbie is not uncooked. Debbie is ataractic. Leena is parous. Leena is ungathered. Leena is not uncooked. If Leena is quondam and Leena is ungathered then Leena is replete. Blue people are floored. If someone is ungathered and not uncooked then they are quondam. Leena is quondam.", "logic": "\nFloored(perri)\nUngathered(perri)\nQuondam(perri)\nParous(debbie)\nnot Replete(debbie)\nFloored(debbie)\nUngathered(debbie)\nnot Uncooked(debbie)\nAtaractic(debbie)\nParous(leena)\nUngathered(leena)\nnot Uncooked(leena)\nQuondam(leena) and Ungathered(leena) -> Replete(leena)\nforall x (Replete(x) -> Floored(x))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) and not Uncooked(x) -> Quondam(x))\n\nQuondam(leena)\n\nUngathered(leena) and not Uncooked(leena) and forall x (Ungathered(x) and not Uncooked(x) -> Quondam(x)) -> therefore Quondam(leena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Nannie is iodized. Nannie is centigrade. Nannie is racemose. Wilbert is underslung. Wilbert is not thronged. Wilbert is iodized. Wilbert is centigrade. Wilbert is not draped. Wilbert is monthlong. Franky is underslung. Franky is centigrade. Franky is not draped. If Franky is racemose and Franky is centigrade then Franky is thronged. Blue people are iodized. If someone is centigrade and not draped then they are racemose. Franky is not racemose.", "logic": "\nIodized(nannie)\nCentigrade(nannie)\nRacemose(nannie)\nUnderslung(wilbert)\nnot Thronged(wilbert)\nIodized(wilbert)\nCentigrade(wilbert)\nnot Draped(wilbert)\nMonthlong(wilbert)\nUnderslung(franky)\nCentigrade(franky)\nnot Draped(franky)\nRacemose(franky) and Centigrade(franky) -> Thronged(franky)\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Iodized(x))\nforall x (Centigrade(x) and not Draped(x) -> Racemose(x))\n\nnot Racemose(franky)\n\nCentigrade(franky) and not Draped(franky) and forall x (Centigrade(x) and not Draped(x) -> Racemose(x)) -> therefore Racemose(franky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Herb is mobbish. Herb is inculpable. Herb is warring. Aub is prepaid. Aub is not disciform. Aub is mobbish. Aub is inculpable. Aub is not fourscore. Aub is aided. Chicky is prepaid. Chicky is inculpable. Chicky is not fourscore. If Chicky is warring and Chicky is inculpable then Chicky is disciform. Blue people are mobbish. If someone is inculpable and not fourscore then they are warring. Chicky is disciform.", "logic": "\nMobbish(herb)\nInculpable(herb)\nWarring(herb)\nPrepaid(aub)\nnot Disciform(aub)\nMobbish(aub)\nInculpable(aub)\nnot Fourscore(aub)\nAided(aub)\nPrepaid(chicky)\nInculpable(chicky)\nnot Fourscore(chicky)\nWarring(chicky) and Inculpable(chicky) -> Disciform(chicky)\nforall x (Disciform(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) and not Fourscore(x) -> Warring(x))\n\nDisciform(chicky)\n\nInculpable(chicky) and not Fourscore(chicky) and forall x (Inculpable(x) and not Fourscore(x) -> Warring(x)) -> therefore Warring(chicky) Warring(chicky) and Inculpable(chicky) and Warring(chicky) and Inculpable(chicky) -> Disciform(chicky) -> therefore Disciform(chicky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Adella is scheming. Adella is credited. Adella is furtive. Melamie is globose. Melamie is not grumose. Melamie is scheming. Melamie is credited. Melamie is not diadromous. Melamie is scenic. Winston is globose. Winston is credited. Winston is not diadromous. If Winston is furtive and Winston is credited then Winston is grumose. Blue people are scheming. If someone is credited and not diadromous then they are furtive. Winston is not grumose.", "logic": "\nScheming(adella)\nCredited(adella)\nFurtive(adella)\nGlobose(melamie)\nnot Grumose(melamie)\nScheming(melamie)\nCredited(melamie)\nnot Diadromous(melamie)\nScenic(melamie)\nGlobose(winston)\nCredited(winston)\nnot Diadromous(winston)\nFurtive(winston) and Credited(winston) -> Grumose(winston)\nforall x (Grumose(x) -> Scheming(x))\nforall x (Credited(x) and not Diadromous(x) -> Furtive(x))\n\nnot Grumose(winston)\n\nCredited(winston) and not Diadromous(winston) and forall x (Credited(x) and not Diadromous(x) -> Furtive(x)) -> therefore Furtive(winston) Furtive(winston) and Credited(winston) and Furtive(winston) and Credited(winston) -> Grumose(winston) -> therefore Grumose(winston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Agata is hind. Agata is fabled. Agata is steroidal. Parwane is fitful. Parwane is not lendable. Parwane is hind. Parwane is fabled. Parwane is not auxetic. Parwane is adpressed. Godwin is fitful. Godwin is fabled. Godwin is not auxetic. If Godwin is steroidal and Godwin is fabled then Godwin is lendable. Blue people are hind. If someone is fabled and not auxetic then they are steroidal. Godwin is hind.", "logic": "\nHind(agata)\nFabled(agata)\nSteroidal(agata)\nFitful(parwane)\nnot Lendable(parwane)\nHind(parwane)\nFabled(parwane)\nnot Auxetic(parwane)\nAdpressed(parwane)\nFitful(godwin)\nFabled(godwin)\nnot Auxetic(godwin)\nSteroidal(godwin) and Fabled(godwin) -> Lendable(godwin)\nforall x (Lendable(x) -> Hind(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) and not Auxetic(x) -> Steroidal(x))\n\nHind(godwin)\n\nFabled(godwin) and not Auxetic(godwin) and forall x (Fabled(x) and not Auxetic(x) -> Steroidal(x)) -> therefore Steroidal(godwin) Steroidal(godwin) and Fabled(godwin) and Steroidal(godwin) and Fabled(godwin) -> Lendable(godwin) -> therefore Lendable(godwin) Lendable(godwin) and forall x (Lendable(x) -> Hind(x)) -> therefore Hind(godwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Graig is pillaged. Graig is blebby. Graig is common. Cody is upstage. Cody is not brilliant. Cody is pillaged. Cody is blebby. Cody is not jacobinic. Cody is earthly. Chance is upstage. Chance is blebby. Chance is not jacobinic. If Chance is common and Chance is blebby then Chance is brilliant. Blue people are pillaged. If someone is blebby and not jacobinic then they are common. Chance is not pillaged.", "logic": "\nPillaged(graig)\nBlebby(graig)\nCommon(graig)\nUpstage(cody)\nnot Brilliant(cody)\nPillaged(cody)\nBlebby(cody)\nnot Jacobinic(cody)\nEarthly(cody)\nUpstage(chance)\nBlebby(chance)\nnot Jacobinic(chance)\nCommon(chance) and Blebby(chance) -> Brilliant(chance)\nforall x (Brilliant(x) -> Pillaged(x))\nforall x (Blebby(x) and not Jacobinic(x) -> Common(x))\n\nnot Pillaged(chance)\n\nBlebby(chance) and not Jacobinic(chance) and forall x (Blebby(x) and not Jacobinic(x) -> Common(x)) -> therefore Common(chance) Common(chance) and Blebby(chance) and Common(chance) and Blebby(chance) -> Brilliant(chance) -> therefore Brilliant(chance) Brilliant(chance) and forall x (Brilliant(x) -> Pillaged(x)) -> therefore Pillaged(chance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Corene is sane. Corene is adulterous. Corene is infernal. Julienne is lowering. Julienne is not particular. Julienne is sane. Julienne is adulterous. Julienne is not libertine. Julienne is mounted. Marvin is lowering. Marvin is adulterous. Marvin is not libertine. If Marvin is infernal and Marvin is adulterous then Marvin is particular. Blue people are sane. If someone is adulterous and not libertine then they are infernal. Corene is not libertine.", "logic": "\nSane(corene)\nAdulterous(corene)\nInfernal(corene)\nLowering(julienne)\nnot Particular(julienne)\nSane(julienne)\nAdulterous(julienne)\nnot Libertine(julienne)\nMounted(julienne)\nLowering(marvin)\nAdulterous(marvin)\nnot Libertine(marvin)\nInfernal(marvin) and Adulterous(marvin) -> Particular(marvin)\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Sane(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) and not Libertine(x) -> Infernal(x))\n\nnot Libertine(corene)\n\nnot Libertine(corene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Shelagh is noteworthy. Shelagh is moony. Shelagh is risen. Berthe is barbarous. Berthe is not astylar. Berthe is noteworthy. Berthe is moony. Berthe is not unbranched. Berthe is boggy. Cathee is barbarous. Cathee is moony. Cathee is not unbranched. If Cathee is risen and Cathee is moony then Cathee is astylar. Blue people are noteworthy. If someone is moony and not unbranched then they are risen. Shelagh is boggy.", "logic": "\nNoteworthy(shelagh)\nMoony(shelagh)\nRisen(shelagh)\nBarbarous(berthe)\nnot Astylar(berthe)\nNoteworthy(berthe)\nMoony(berthe)\nnot Unbranched(berthe)\nBoggy(berthe)\nBarbarous(cathee)\nMoony(cathee)\nnot Unbranched(cathee)\nRisen(cathee) and Moony(cathee) -> Astylar(cathee)\nforall x (Astylar(x) -> Noteworthy(x))\nforall x (Moony(x) and not Unbranched(x) -> Risen(x))\n\nBoggy(shelagh)\n\nBoggy(shelagh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Vito is stoic. Vito is aboveboard. Vito is herbal. Town is simplified. Town is not ischaemic. Town is stoic. Town is aboveboard. Town is not protected. Town is soviet. Carly is simplified. Carly is aboveboard. Carly is not protected. If Carly is herbal and Carly is aboveboard then Carly is ischaemic. Blue people are stoic. If someone is aboveboard and not protected then they are herbal. Vito is not ischaemic.", "logic": "\nStoic(vito)\nAboveboard(vito)\nHerbal(vito)\nSimplified(town)\nnot Ischaemic(town)\nStoic(town)\nAboveboard(town)\nnot Protected(town)\nSoviet(town)\nSimplified(carly)\nAboveboard(carly)\nnot Protected(carly)\nHerbal(carly) and Aboveboard(carly) -> Ischaemic(carly)\nforall x (Ischaemic(x) -> Stoic(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) and not Protected(x) -> Herbal(x))\n\nnot Ischaemic(vito)\n\nnot Ischaemic(vito) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Gena is sudanese. Gena is uninitiate. Gena is prudential. Sande is central. Sande is not wheeled. Sande is sudanese. Sande is uninitiate. Sande is not dazzled. Sande is impressive. Dulcy is central. Dulcy is uninitiate. Dulcy is not dazzled. If Dulcy is prudential and Dulcy is uninitiate then Dulcy is wheeled. Blue people are sudanese. If someone is uninitiate and not dazzled then they are prudential. Dulcy is impressive.", "logic": "\nSudanese(gena)\nUninitiate(gena)\nPrudential(gena)\nCentral(sande)\nnot Wheeled(sande)\nSudanese(sande)\nUninitiate(sande)\nnot Dazzled(sande)\nImpressive(sande)\nCentral(dulcy)\nUninitiate(dulcy)\nnot Dazzled(dulcy)\nPrudential(dulcy) and Uninitiate(dulcy) -> Wheeled(dulcy)\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Sudanese(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) and not Dazzled(x) -> Prudential(x))\n\nImpressive(dulcy)\n\nImpressive(dulcy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The emlynn is capitalist. If something is screwy then it is fruity. All fruity things are aerolitic. If the emlynn is fruity and the emlynn is drowsy then the emlynn is aerolitic. All capitalist things are screwy. If the emlynn is screwy then the emlynn is capitalist. All aerolitic things are drowsy. The emlynn is capitalist.", "logic": "\nCapitalist(emlynn)\nforall x (Screwy(x) -> Fruity(x))\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> Aerolitic(x))\nFruity(emlynn) and Drowsy(emlynn) -> Aerolitic(emlynn)\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Screwy(x))\nScrewy(emlynn) -> Capitalist(emlynn)\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Drowsy(x))\n\nCapitalist(emlynn)\n\ntherefore Capitalist(emlynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The vladimir is polyatomic. If something is induced then it is bilious. All bilious things are masculine. If the vladimir is bilious and the vladimir is gawky then the vladimir is masculine. All polyatomic things are induced. If the vladimir is induced then the vladimir is polyatomic. All masculine things are gawky. The vladimir is not polyatomic.", "logic": "\nPolyatomic(vladimir)\nforall x (Induced(x) -> Bilious(x))\nforall x (Bilious(x) -> Masculine(x))\nBilious(vladimir) and Gawky(vladimir) -> Masculine(vladimir)\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Induced(x))\nInduced(vladimir) -> Polyatomic(vladimir)\nforall x (Masculine(x) -> Gawky(x))\n\nnot Polyatomic(vladimir)\n\ntherefore Polyatomic(vladimir)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The mignon is abkhazian. If something is vesicatory then it is thickening. All thickening things are nonliving. If the mignon is thickening and the mignon is ballistic then the mignon is nonliving. All abkhazian things are vesicatory. If the mignon is vesicatory then the mignon is abkhazian. All nonliving things are ballistic. The mignon is vesicatory.", "logic": "\nAbkhazian(mignon)\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) -> Thickening(x))\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Nonliving(x))\nThickening(mignon) and Ballistic(mignon) -> Nonliving(mignon)\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Vesicatory(x))\nVesicatory(mignon) -> Abkhazian(mignon)\nforall x (Nonliving(x) -> Ballistic(x))\n\nVesicatory(mignon)\n\nAbkhazian(mignon) and forall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Vesicatory(x)) -> therefore Vesicatory(mignon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The charisse is relieved. If something is veridical then it is diffusing. All diffusing things are guilty. If the charisse is diffusing and the charisse is caesural then the charisse is guilty. All relieved things are veridical. If the charisse is veridical then the charisse is relieved. All guilty things are caesural. The charisse is not veridical.", "logic": "\nRelieved(charisse)\nforall x (Veridical(x) -> Diffusing(x))\nforall x (Diffusing(x) -> Guilty(x))\nDiffusing(charisse) and Caesural(charisse) -> Guilty(charisse)\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Veridical(x))\nVeridical(charisse) -> Relieved(charisse)\nforall x (Guilty(x) -> Caesural(x))\n\nnot Veridical(charisse)\n\nRelieved(charisse) and forall x (Relieved(x) -> Veridical(x)) -> therefore Veridical(charisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The kalli is jesuitic. If something is unfocused then it is agamic. All agamic things are cuban. If the kalli is agamic and the kalli is edwardian then the kalli is cuban. All jesuitic things are unfocused. If the kalli is unfocused then the kalli is jesuitic. All cuban things are edwardian. The kalli is agamic.", "logic": "\nJesuitic(kalli)\nforall x (Unfocused(x) -> Agamic(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Cuban(x))\nAgamic(kalli) and Edwardian(kalli) -> Cuban(kalli)\nforall x (Jesuitic(x) -> Unfocused(x))\nUnfocused(kalli) -> Jesuitic(kalli)\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Edwardian(x))\n\nAgamic(kalli)\n\nJesuitic(kalli) and forall x (Jesuitic(x) -> Unfocused(x)) -> therefore Unfocused(kalli) Unfocused(kalli) and forall x (Unfocused(x) -> Agamic(x)) -> therefore Agamic(kalli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The thia is prenatal. If something is leaden then it is meaty. All meaty things are dominating. If the thia is meaty and the thia is subsonic then the thia is dominating. All prenatal things are leaden. If the thia is leaden then the thia is prenatal. All dominating things are subsonic. The thia is not meaty.", "logic": "\nPrenatal(thia)\nforall x (Leaden(x) -> Meaty(x))\nforall x (Meaty(x) -> Dominating(x))\nMeaty(thia) and Subsonic(thia) -> Dominating(thia)\nforall x (Prenatal(x) -> Leaden(x))\nLeaden(thia) -> Prenatal(thia)\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Subsonic(x))\n\nnot Meaty(thia)\n\nPrenatal(thia) and forall x (Prenatal(x) -> Leaden(x)) -> therefore Leaden(thia) Leaden(thia) and forall x (Leaden(x) -> Meaty(x)) -> therefore Meaty(thia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The batsheva is lengthy. If something is screaming then it is silvern. All silvern things are revocable. If the batsheva is silvern and the batsheva is extremist then the batsheva is revocable. All lengthy things are screaming. If the batsheva is screaming then the batsheva is lengthy. All revocable things are extremist. The batsheva is revocable.", "logic": "\nLengthy(batsheva)\nforall x (Screaming(x) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) -> Revocable(x))\nSilvern(batsheva) and Extremist(batsheva) -> Revocable(batsheva)\nforall x (Lengthy(x) -> Screaming(x))\nScreaming(batsheva) -> Lengthy(batsheva)\nforall x (Revocable(x) -> Extremist(x))\n\nRevocable(batsheva)\n\nLengthy(batsheva) and forall x (Lengthy(x) -> Screaming(x)) -> therefore Screaming(batsheva) Screaming(batsheva) and forall x (Screaming(x) -> Silvern(x)) -> therefore Silvern(batsheva) Silvern(batsheva) and forall x (Silvern(x) -> Revocable(x)) -> therefore Revocable(batsheva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The elianora is burdenless. If something is recurrent then it is landed. All landed things are cellular. If the elianora is landed and the elianora is hired then the elianora is cellular. All burdenless things are recurrent. If the elianora is recurrent then the elianora is burdenless. All cellular things are hired. The elianora is not cellular.", "logic": "\nBurdenless(elianora)\nforall x (Recurrent(x) -> Landed(x))\nforall x (Landed(x) -> Cellular(x))\nLanded(elianora) and Hired(elianora) -> Cellular(elianora)\nforall x (Burdenless(x) -> Recurrent(x))\nRecurrent(elianora) -> Burdenless(elianora)\nforall x (Cellular(x) -> Hired(x))\n\nnot Cellular(elianora)\n\nBurdenless(elianora) and forall x (Burdenless(x) -> Recurrent(x)) -> therefore Recurrent(elianora) Recurrent(elianora) and forall x (Recurrent(x) -> Landed(x)) -> therefore Landed(elianora) Landed(elianora) and forall x (Landed(x) -> Cellular(x)) -> therefore Cellular(elianora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The selestina is contorted. If something is unique then it is bifacial. All bifacial things are alike. If the selestina is bifacial and the selestina is eurasiatic then the selestina is alike. All contorted things are unique. If the selestina is unique then the selestina is contorted. All alike things are eurasiatic. The selestina does not visit the selestina.", "logic": "\nContorted(selestina)\nforall x (Unique(x) -> Bifacial(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Alike(x))\nBifacial(selestina) and Eurasiatic(selestina) -> Alike(selestina)\nforall x (Contorted(x) -> Unique(x))\nUnique(selestina) -> Contorted(selestina)\nforall x (Alike(x) -> Eurasiatic(x))\n\nnot Visits(selestina, selestina)\n\nnot Visits(selestina, selestina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The arlina is sulky. If something is ladylike then it is zymotic. All zymotic things are pervious. If the arlina is zymotic and the arlina is amicable then the arlina is pervious. All sulky things are ladylike. If the arlina is ladylike then the arlina is sulky. All pervious things are amicable. The arlina needs the arlina.", "logic": "\nSulky(arlina)\nforall x (Ladylike(x) -> Zymotic(x))\nforall x (Zymotic(x) -> Pervious(x))\nZymotic(arlina) and Amicable(arlina) -> Pervious(arlina)\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Ladylike(x))\nLadylike(arlina) -> Sulky(arlina)\nforall x (Pervious(x) -> Amicable(x))\n\nNeeds(arlina, arlina)\n\nNeeds(arlina, arlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "Heide is studious. Heide is kooky. Raymond is glabellar. Raymond is noseless. Raymond is kooky. Tannie is glabellar. Tannie is kooky. If someone is trig and kooky then they are studious. Blue, glabellar people are norman. White people are trig. Heide is studious.", "logic": "\nStudious(heide)\nKooky(heide)\nGlabellar(raymond)\nNoseless(raymond)\nKooky(raymond)\nGlabellar(tannie)\nKooky(tannie)\nforall x (Trig(x) and Kooky(x) -> Studious(x))\nforall x (Studious(x) and Glabellar(x) -> Norman(x))\nforall x (Kooky(x) -> Trig(x))\n\nStudious(heide)\n\ntherefore Studious(heide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Raychel is unsubtle. Raychel is beaded. Garvy is lxxiv. Garvy is acrid. Garvy is beaded. Lillis is lxxiv. Lillis is beaded. If someone is baritone and beaded then they are unsubtle. Blue, lxxiv people are reprobate. White people are baritone. Garvy is not acrid.", "logic": "\nUnsubtle(raychel)\nBeaded(raychel)\nLxxiv(garvy)\nAcrid(garvy)\nBeaded(garvy)\nLxxiv(lillis)\nBeaded(lillis)\nforall x (Baritone(x) and Beaded(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\nforall x (Unsubtle(x) and Lxxiv(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Beaded(x) -> Baritone(x))\n\nnot Acrid(garvy)\n\ntherefore Acrid(garvy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Mickie is monthlong. Mickie is militant. Felicio is irrational. Felicio is overblown. Felicio is militant. Davy is irrational. Davy is militant. If someone is vaporized and militant then they are monthlong. Blue, irrational people are stuporous. White people are vaporized. Mickie is vaporized.", "logic": "\nMonthlong(mickie)\nMilitant(mickie)\nIrrational(felicio)\nOverblown(felicio)\nMilitant(felicio)\nIrrational(davy)\nMilitant(davy)\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and Militant(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Monthlong(x) and Irrational(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Militant(x) -> Vaporized(x))\n\nVaporized(mickie)\n\nMilitant(mickie) and forall x (Militant(x) -> Vaporized(x)) -> therefore Vaporized(mickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Sylvan is ascendant. Sylvan is entangled. Thaine is clausal. Thaine is wailful. Thaine is entangled. Arden is clausal. Arden is entangled. If someone is treasonous and entangled then they are ascendant. Blue, clausal people are unreliable. White people are treasonous. Sylvan is not treasonous.", "logic": "\nAscendant(sylvan)\nEntangled(sylvan)\nClausal(thaine)\nWailful(thaine)\nEntangled(thaine)\nClausal(arden)\nEntangled(arden)\nforall x (Treasonous(x) and Entangled(x) -> Ascendant(x))\nforall x (Ascendant(x) and Clausal(x) -> Unreliable(x))\nforall x (Entangled(x) -> Treasonous(x))\n\nnot Treasonous(sylvan)\n\nEntangled(sylvan) and forall x (Entangled(x) -> Treasonous(x)) -> therefore Treasonous(sylvan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Marcella is underslung. Marcella is unswept. Margo is ferny. Margo is skinny. Margo is unswept. Agna is ferny. Agna is unswept. If someone is inflated and unswept then they are underslung. Blue, ferny people are vaporish. White people are inflated. Agna is underslung.", "logic": "\nUnderslung(marcella)\nUnswept(marcella)\nFerny(margo)\nSkinny(margo)\nUnswept(margo)\nFerny(agna)\nUnswept(agna)\nforall x (Inflated(x) and Unswept(x) -> Underslung(x))\nforall x (Underslung(x) and Ferny(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Unswept(x) -> Inflated(x))\n\nUnderslung(agna)\n\nUnswept(agna) and forall x (Unswept(x) -> Inflated(x)) -> therefore Inflated(agna) Inflated(agna) and Unswept(agna) and forall x (Inflated(x) and Unswept(x) -> Underslung(x)) -> therefore Underslung(agna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Stephani is durable. Stephani is cryogenic. Avivah is assumed. Avivah is vigesimal. Avivah is cryogenic. Breena is assumed. Breena is cryogenic. If someone is hunched and cryogenic then they are durable. Blue, assumed people are auditory. White people are hunched. Avivah is not durable.", "logic": "\nDurable(stephani)\nCryogenic(stephani)\nAssumed(avivah)\nVigesimal(avivah)\nCryogenic(avivah)\nAssumed(breena)\nCryogenic(breena)\nforall x (Hunched(x) and Cryogenic(x) -> Durable(x))\nforall x (Durable(x) and Assumed(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Hunched(x))\n\nnot Durable(avivah)\n\nCryogenic(avivah) and forall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Hunched(x)) -> therefore Hunched(avivah) Hunched(avivah) and Cryogenic(avivah) and forall x (Hunched(x) and Cryogenic(x) -> Durable(x)) -> therefore Durable(avivah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Rivy is splay. Rivy is provincial. Dorine is imaginary. Dorine is astral. Dorine is provincial. Sisely is imaginary. Sisely is provincial. If someone is preachy and provincial then they are splay. Blue, imaginary people are celluloid. White people are preachy. Sisely is celluloid.", "logic": "\nSplay(rivy)\nProvincial(rivy)\nImaginary(dorine)\nAstral(dorine)\nProvincial(dorine)\nImaginary(sisely)\nProvincial(sisely)\nforall x (Preachy(x) and Provincial(x) -> Splay(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) and Imaginary(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Preachy(x))\n\nCelluloid(sisely)\n\nProvincial(sisely) and forall x (Provincial(x) -> Preachy(x)) -> therefore Preachy(sisely) Preachy(sisely) and Provincial(sisely) and forall x (Preachy(x) and Provincial(x) -> Splay(x)) -> therefore Splay(sisely) Splay(sisely) and Imaginary(sisely) and forall x (Splay(x) and Imaginary(x) -> Celluloid(x)) -> therefore Celluloid(sisely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Vernen is throaty. Vernen is piggish. Darsie is surprising. Darsie is unbaffled. Darsie is piggish. Carie is surprising. Carie is piggish. If someone is gloved and piggish then they are throaty. Blue, surprising people are takeout. White people are gloved. Darsie is not takeout.", "logic": "\nThroaty(vernen)\nPiggish(vernen)\nSurprising(darsie)\nUnbaffled(darsie)\nPiggish(darsie)\nSurprising(carie)\nPiggish(carie)\nforall x (Gloved(x) and Piggish(x) -> Throaty(x))\nforall x (Throaty(x) and Surprising(x) -> Takeout(x))\nforall x (Piggish(x) -> Gloved(x))\n\nnot Takeout(darsie)\n\nPiggish(darsie) and forall x (Piggish(x) -> Gloved(x)) -> therefore Gloved(darsie) Gloved(darsie) and Piggish(darsie) and forall x (Gloved(x) and Piggish(x) -> Throaty(x)) -> therefore Throaty(darsie) Throaty(darsie) and Surprising(darsie) and forall x (Throaty(x) and Surprising(x) -> Takeout(x)) -> therefore Takeout(darsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Corette is rolled. Corette is disfigured. Patrizia is vivid. Patrizia is agrarian. Patrizia is disfigured. Ginny is vivid. Ginny is disfigured. If someone is lifesize and disfigured then they are rolled. Blue, vivid people are surmisable. White people are lifesize. Corette is not surmisable.", "logic": "\nRolled(corette)\nDisfigured(corette)\nVivid(patrizia)\nAgrarian(patrizia)\nDisfigured(patrizia)\nVivid(ginny)\nDisfigured(ginny)\nforall x (Lifesize(x) and Disfigured(x) -> Rolled(x))\nforall x (Rolled(x) and Vivid(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) -> Lifesize(x))\n\nnot Surmisable(corette)\n\nforall x (Rolled(x) and Vivid(x) -> Surmisable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Toinette is mortal. Toinette is amphibious. Haydon is stoppered. Haydon is albinic. Haydon is amphibious. Trudi is stoppered. Trudi is amphibious. If someone is limpid and amphibious then they are mortal. Blue, stoppered people are spick. White people are limpid. Trudi is rough.", "logic": "\nMortal(toinette)\nAmphibious(toinette)\nStoppered(haydon)\nAlbinic(haydon)\nAmphibious(haydon)\nStoppered(trudi)\nAmphibious(trudi)\nforall x (Limpid(x) and Amphibious(x) -> Mortal(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) and Stoppered(x) -> Spick(x))\nforall x (Amphibious(x) -> Limpid(x))\n\nRough(trudi)\n\nRough(trudi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Dallas is recovering. Dallas is bedimmed. Sara is drafty. Sara is malaysian. Sara is bedimmed. Lenette is drafty. Lenette is bedimmed. If someone is hatless and bedimmed then they are recovering. Blue, drafty people are holey. White people are hatless. Sara is not rough.", "logic": "\nRecovering(dallas)\nBedimmed(dallas)\nDrafty(sara)\nMalaysian(sara)\nBedimmed(sara)\nDrafty(lenette)\nBedimmed(lenette)\nforall x (Hatless(x) and Bedimmed(x) -> Recovering(x))\nforall x (Recovering(x) and Drafty(x) -> Holey(x))\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) -> Hatless(x))\n\nnot Rough(sara)\n\nnot Rough(sara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Ashley is thyroidal. Ashley is misbranded. Chrissie is aerobic. Chrissie is surd. Chrissie is misbranded. Jonis is aerobic. Jonis is misbranded. If someone is anuretic and misbranded then they are thyroidal. Blue, aerobic people are foreboding. White people are anuretic. Ashley is aerobic.", "logic": "\nThyroidal(ashley)\nMisbranded(ashley)\nAerobic(chrissie)\nSurd(chrissie)\nMisbranded(chrissie)\nAerobic(jonis)\nMisbranded(jonis)\nforall x (Anuretic(x) and Misbranded(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\nforall x (Thyroidal(x) and Aerobic(x) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) -> Anuretic(x))\n\nAerobic(ashley)\n\nAerobic(ashley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Bea is afire. Bea is synoptical. Shelly is resolute. Shelly is benignant. Shelly is synoptical. Hashim is resolute. Hashim is synoptical. If someone is languid and synoptical then they are afire. Blue, resolute people are asteroidal. White people are languid. Hashim is not benignant.", "logic": "\nAfire(bea)\nSynoptical(bea)\nResolute(shelly)\nBenignant(shelly)\nSynoptical(shelly)\nResolute(hashim)\nSynoptical(hashim)\nforall x (Languid(x) and Synoptical(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and Resolute(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> Languid(x))\n\nnot Benignant(hashim)\n\nnot Benignant(hashim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Talya is canonist. Talya is sculptured. Jeannine is bronchial. Jeannine is natal. Jeannine is sculptured. Lurette is bronchial. Lurette is sculptured. If someone is posthumous and sculptured then they are canonist. Blue, bronchial people are untasted. White people are posthumous. Talya is rough.", "logic": "\nCanonist(talya)\nSculptured(talya)\nBronchial(jeannine)\nNatal(jeannine)\nSculptured(jeannine)\nBronchial(lurette)\nSculptured(lurette)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) and Sculptured(x) -> Canonist(x))\nforall x (Canonist(x) and Bronchial(x) -> Untasted(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) -> Posthumous(x))\n\nRough(talya)\n\nRough(talya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "The marry is unbounded. Big, center people are mishnaic. If someone is center and clipped then they are unbounded. All center, clipped people are not traitorous. All unbounded people are traitorous. If someone is clipped and center then they are traitorous. All traitorous people are center. Red, unbounded people are center. If the marry is traitorous then the marry is unbounded. The marry is unbounded.", "logic": "\nUnbounded(marry)\nforall x (Unbounded(x) and Center(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Center(x) and Clipped(x) -> Unbounded(x))\nforall x (Center(x) and Clipped(x) -> not Traitorous(x))\nforall x (Unbounded(x) -> Traitorous(x))\nforall x (Clipped(x) and Center(x) -> Traitorous(x))\nforall x (Traitorous(x) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) and Unbounded(x) -> Center(x))\nTraitorous(marry) -> Unbounded(marry)\n\nUnbounded(marry)\n\ntherefore Unbounded(marry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The arvin is untidy. Big, thirteenth people are apoplectic. If someone is thirteenth and destitute then they are untidy. All thirteenth, destitute people are not dormant. All untidy people are dormant. If someone is destitute and thirteenth then they are dormant. All dormant people are thirteenth. Red, untidy people are thirteenth. If the arvin is dormant then the arvin is untidy. The arvin is not untidy.", "logic": "\nUntidy(arvin)\nforall x (Untidy(x) and Thirteenth(x) -> Apoplectic(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and Destitute(x) -> Untidy(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and Destitute(x) -> not Dormant(x))\nforall x (Untidy(x) -> Dormant(x))\nforall x (Destitute(x) and Thirteenth(x) -> Dormant(x))\nforall x (Dormant(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Apoplectic(x) and Untidy(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nDormant(arvin) -> Untidy(arvin)\n\nnot Untidy(arvin)\n\ntherefore Untidy(arvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The eve is anatomical. Big, glorified people are clarifying. If someone is glorified and tramontane then they are anatomical. All glorified, tramontane people are not freehand. All anatomical people are freehand. If someone is tramontane and glorified then they are freehand. All freehand people are glorified. Red, anatomical people are glorified. If the eve is freehand then the eve is anatomical. The eve is freehand.", "logic": "\nAnatomical(eve)\nforall x (Anatomical(x) and Glorified(x) -> Clarifying(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) and Tramontane(x) -> Anatomical(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) and Tramontane(x) -> not Freehand(x))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) and Glorified(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Freehand(x) -> Glorified(x))\nforall x (Clarifying(x) and Anatomical(x) -> Glorified(x))\nFreehand(eve) -> Anatomical(eve)\n\nFreehand(eve)\n\nAnatomical(eve) and forall x (Anatomical(x) -> Freehand(x)) -> therefore Freehand(eve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The kassi is accusative. Big, sufficient people are hastate. If someone is sufficient and sheltered then they are accusative. All sufficient, sheltered people are not feculent. All accusative people are feculent. If someone is sheltered and sufficient then they are feculent. All feculent people are sufficient. Red, accusative people are sufficient. If the kassi is feculent then the kassi is accusative. The kassi is not feculent.", "logic": "\nAccusative(kassi)\nforall x (Accusative(x) and Sufficient(x) -> Hastate(x))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) and Sheltered(x) -> Accusative(x))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) and Sheltered(x) -> not Feculent(x))\nforall x (Accusative(x) -> Feculent(x))\nforall x (Sheltered(x) and Sufficient(x) -> Feculent(x))\nforall x (Feculent(x) -> Sufficient(x))\nforall x (Hastate(x) and Accusative(x) -> Sufficient(x))\nFeculent(kassi) -> Accusative(kassi)\n\nnot Feculent(kassi)\n\nAccusative(kassi) and forall x (Accusative(x) -> Feculent(x)) -> therefore Feculent(kassi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The krishna is smutty. Big, flameproof people are earned. If someone is flameproof and scrappy then they are smutty. All flameproof, scrappy people are not nearby. All smutty people are nearby. If someone is scrappy and flameproof then they are nearby. All nearby people are flameproof. Red, smutty people are flameproof. If the krishna is nearby then the krishna is smutty. The krishna is flameproof.", "logic": "\nSmutty(krishna)\nforall x (Smutty(x) and Flameproof(x) -> Earned(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Scrappy(x) -> Smutty(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Scrappy(x) -> not Nearby(x))\nforall x (Smutty(x) -> Nearby(x))\nforall x (Scrappy(x) and Flameproof(x) -> Nearby(x))\nforall x (Nearby(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Earned(x) and Smutty(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nNearby(krishna) -> Smutty(krishna)\n\nFlameproof(krishna)\n\nSmutty(krishna) and forall x (Smutty(x) -> Nearby(x)) -> therefore Nearby(krishna) Nearby(krishna) and forall x (Nearby(x) -> Flameproof(x)) -> therefore Flameproof(krishna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The orlando is frisian. Big, dampish people are bearded. If someone is dampish and ruritanian then they are frisian. All dampish, ruritanian people are not skilled. All frisian people are skilled. If someone is ruritanian and dampish then they are skilled. All skilled people are dampish. Red, frisian people are dampish. If the orlando is skilled then the orlando is frisian. The orlando is not dampish.", "logic": "\nFrisian(orlando)\nforall x (Frisian(x) and Dampish(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Ruritanian(x) -> Frisian(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Ruritanian(x) -> not Skilled(x))\nforall x (Frisian(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Ruritanian(x) and Dampish(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Dampish(x))\nforall x (Bearded(x) and Frisian(x) -> Dampish(x))\nSkilled(orlando) -> Frisian(orlando)\n\nnot Dampish(orlando)\n\nFrisian(orlando) and forall x (Frisian(x) -> Skilled(x)) -> therefore Skilled(orlando) Skilled(orlando) and forall x (Skilled(x) -> Dampish(x)) -> therefore Dampish(orlando)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The zorana is prodromal. Big, welcoming people are eloquent. If someone is welcoming and nacreous then they are prodromal. All welcoming, nacreous people are not unalloyed. All prodromal people are unalloyed. If someone is nacreous and welcoming then they are unalloyed. All unalloyed people are welcoming. Red, prodromal people are welcoming. If the zorana is unalloyed then the zorana is prodromal. The zorana is eloquent.", "logic": "\nProdromal(zorana)\nforall x (Prodromal(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) and Nacreous(x) -> Prodromal(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) and Nacreous(x) -> not Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Prodromal(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Nacreous(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nforall x (Eloquent(x) and Prodromal(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nUnalloyed(zorana) -> Prodromal(zorana)\n\nEloquent(zorana)\n\nProdromal(zorana) and forall x (Prodromal(x) -> Unalloyed(x)) -> therefore Unalloyed(zorana) Unalloyed(zorana) and forall x (Unalloyed(x) -> Welcoming(x)) -> therefore Welcoming(zorana) Prodromal(zorana) and Welcoming(zorana) and forall x (Prodromal(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Eloquent(x)) -> therefore Eloquent(zorana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The webb is tramontane. Big, greenside people are tenable. If someone is greenside and arch then they are tramontane. All greenside, arch people are not webbed. All tramontane people are webbed. If someone is arch and greenside then they are webbed. All webbed people are greenside. Red, tramontane people are greenside. If the webb is webbed then the webb is tramontane. The webb is not tenable.", "logic": "\nTramontane(webb)\nforall x (Tramontane(x) and Greenside(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Greenside(x) and Arch(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Greenside(x) and Arch(x) -> not Webbed(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> Webbed(x))\nforall x (Arch(x) and Greenside(x) -> Webbed(x))\nforall x (Webbed(x) -> Greenside(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) and Tramontane(x) -> Greenside(x))\nWebbed(webb) -> Tramontane(webb)\n\nnot Tenable(webb)\n\nTramontane(webb) and forall x (Tramontane(x) -> Webbed(x)) -> therefore Webbed(webb) Webbed(webb) and forall x (Webbed(x) -> Greenside(x)) -> therefore Greenside(webb) Tramontane(webb) and Greenside(webb) and forall x (Tramontane(x) and Greenside(x) -> Tenable(x)) -> therefore Tenable(webb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The wain is shady. Big, ephesian people are nestled. If someone is ephesian and sprightly then they are shady. All ephesian, sprightly people are not statute. All shady people are statute. If someone is sprightly and ephesian then they are statute. All statute people are ephesian. Red, shady people are ephesian. If the wain is statute then the wain is shady. The wain does not like the wain.", "logic": "\nShady(wain)\nforall x (Shady(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Nestled(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) and Sprightly(x) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) and Sprightly(x) -> not Statute(x))\nforall x (Shady(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Sprightly(x) and Ephesian(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Statute(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Nestled(x) and Shady(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nStatute(wain) -> Shady(wain)\n\nnot Likes(wain, wain)\n\nnot Likes(wain, wain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The rhett is assertive. Big, weeklong people are demoniacal. If someone is weeklong and worried then they are assertive. All weeklong, worried people are not forty. All assertive people are forty. If someone is worried and weeklong then they are forty. All forty people are weeklong. Red, assertive people are weeklong. If the rhett is forty then the rhett is assertive. The rhett needs the rhett.", "logic": "\nAssertive(rhett)\nforall x (Assertive(x) and Weeklong(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Weeklong(x) and Worried(x) -> Assertive(x))\nforall x (Weeklong(x) and Worried(x) -> not Forty(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Worried(x) and Weeklong(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Forty(x) -> Weeklong(x))\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) and Assertive(x) -> Weeklong(x))\nForty(rhett) -> Assertive(rhett)\n\nNeeds(rhett, rhett)\n\nNeeds(rhett, rhett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The rudyard is despoiled. Big, unflawed people are permeating. If someone is unflawed and unshared then they are despoiled. All unflawed, unshared people are not weeny. All despoiled people are weeny. If someone is unshared and unflawed then they are weeny. All weeny people are unflawed. Red, despoiled people are unflawed. If the rudyard is weeny then the rudyard is despoiled. The rudyard is not unshared.", "logic": "\nDespoiled(rudyard)\nforall x (Despoiled(x) and Unflawed(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Unflawed(x) and Unshared(x) -> Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Unflawed(x) and Unshared(x) -> not Weeny(x))\nforall x (Despoiled(x) -> Weeny(x))\nforall x (Unshared(x) and Unflawed(x) -> Weeny(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) -> Unflawed(x))\nforall x (Permeating(x) and Despoiled(x) -> Unflawed(x))\nWeeny(rudyard) -> Despoiled(rudyard)\n\nnot Unshared(rudyard)\n\nnot Unshared(rudyard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The tamar is meagre. Big, offshore people are peristylar. If someone is offshore and upcurved then they are meagre. All offshore, upcurved people are not entrancing. All meagre people are entrancing. If someone is upcurved and offshore then they are entrancing. All entrancing people are offshore. Red, meagre people are offshore. If the tamar is entrancing then the tamar is meagre. The tamar sees the tamar.", "logic": "\nMeagre(tamar)\nforall x (Meagre(x) and Offshore(x) -> Peristylar(x))\nforall x (Offshore(x) and Upcurved(x) -> Meagre(x))\nforall x (Offshore(x) and Upcurved(x) -> not Entrancing(x))\nforall x (Meagre(x) -> Entrancing(x))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Offshore(x) -> Entrancing(x))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) -> Offshore(x))\nforall x (Peristylar(x) and Meagre(x) -> Offshore(x))\nEntrancing(tamar) -> Meagre(tamar)\n\nSees(tamar, tamar)\n\nSees(tamar, tamar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The selinda eschew the shalna. The selinda is impassive. The selinda is irregular. The selinda is oceangoing. The selinda is glaucous. The selinda is unmanned. The selinda roister the shalna. The selinda drudge the shalna. The shalna eschew the selinda. The shalna is impassive. The shalna is irregular. The shalna is glaucous. The shalna is unmanned. The shalna roister the selinda. The shalna drudge the selinda. If something roister the shalna then it eschew the shalna. If something eschew the shalna then the shalna drudge the selinda. If something eschew the shalna then the shalna eschew the selinda. If something roister the selinda and it is irregular then it drudge the shalna. If something drudge the shalna then it roister the shalna. If the shalna is oceangoing and the shalna is impassive then the shalna roister the selinda. If something drudge the shalna and it is impassive then the shalna is impassive. If something eschew the selinda and the selinda roister the shalna then the selinda drudge the shalna. The shalna eschew the selinda.", "logic": "\nEschew(selinda, shalna)\nImpassive(selinda)\nIrregular(selinda)\nOceangoing(selinda)\nGlaucous(selinda)\nUnmanned(selinda)\nRoister(selinda, shalna)\nDrudge(selinda, shalna)\nEschew(shalna, selinda)\nImpassive(shalna)\nIrregular(shalna)\nGlaucous(shalna)\nUnmanned(shalna)\nRoister(shalna, selinda)\nDrudge(shalna, selinda)\nforall x (Roister(x, shalna) -> Eschew(x, shalna))\nforall x (Eschew(x, shalna) -> Drudge(shalna, selinda))\nforall x (Eschew(x, shalna) -> Eschew(shalna, selinda))\nforall x (Roister(x, selinda) and Irregular(x) -> Drudge(x, shalna))\nforall x (Drudge(x, shalna) -> Roister(x, shalna))\nOceangoing(shalna) and Impassive(shalna) -> Roister(shalna, selinda)\nforall x (Drudge(x, shalna) and Impassive(x) -> Impassive(shalna))\nforall x (Eschew(x, selinda) and Roister(selinda, shalna) -> Drudge(selinda, shalna))\n\nEschew(shalna, selinda)\n\ntherefore Eschew(shalna, selinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The sallee clothe the saraann. The sallee is redeemed. The sallee is batty. The sallee is painted. The sallee is spikelike. The sallee is combinable. The sallee outstare the saraann. The sallee encrimson the saraann. The saraann clothe the sallee. The saraann is redeemed. The saraann is batty. The saraann is spikelike. The saraann is combinable. The saraann outstare the sallee. The saraann encrimson the sallee. If something outstare the saraann then it clothe the saraann. If something clothe the saraann then the saraann encrimson the sallee. If something clothe the saraann then the saraann clothe the sallee. If something outstare the sallee and it is batty then it encrimson the saraann. If something encrimson the saraann then it outstare the saraann. If the saraann is painted and the saraann is redeemed then the saraann outstare the sallee. If something encrimson the saraann and it is redeemed then the saraann is redeemed. If something clothe the sallee and the sallee outstare the saraann then the sallee encrimson the saraann. The saraann does not need the sallee.", "logic": "\nClothe(sallee, saraann)\nRedeemed(sallee)\nBatty(sallee)\nPainted(sallee)\nSpikelike(sallee)\nCombinable(sallee)\nOutstare(sallee, saraann)\nEncrimson(sallee, saraann)\nClothe(saraann, sallee)\nRedeemed(saraann)\nBatty(saraann)\nSpikelike(saraann)\nCombinable(saraann)\nOutstare(saraann, sallee)\nEncrimson(saraann, sallee)\nforall x (Outstare(x, saraann) -> Clothe(x, saraann))\nforall x (Clothe(x, saraann) -> Encrimson(saraann, sallee))\nforall x (Clothe(x, saraann) -> Clothe(saraann, sallee))\nforall x (Outstare(x, sallee) and Batty(x) -> Encrimson(x, saraann))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, saraann) -> Outstare(x, saraann))\nPainted(saraann) and Redeemed(saraann) -> Outstare(saraann, sallee)\nforall x (Encrimson(x, saraann) and Redeemed(x) -> Redeemed(saraann))\nforall x (Clothe(x, sallee) and Outstare(sallee, saraann) -> Encrimson(sallee, saraann))\n\nnot Outstare(saraann, sallee)\n\ntherefore Outstare(saraann, sallee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The yehudit involve the kendra. The yehudit is disliked. The yehudit is unmediated. The yehudit is lovesick. The yehudit is prevenient. The yehudit is minor. The yehudit replay the kendra. The yehudit severalise the kendra. The kendra involve the yehudit. The kendra is disliked. The kendra is unmediated. The kendra is prevenient. The kendra is minor. The kendra replay the yehudit. The kendra severalise the yehudit. If something replay the kendra then it involve the kendra. If something involve the kendra then the kendra severalise the yehudit. If something involve the kendra then the kendra involve the yehudit. If something replay the yehudit and it is unmediated then it severalise the kendra. If something severalise the kendra then it replay the kendra. If the kendra is lovesick and the kendra is disliked then the kendra replay the yehudit. If something severalise the kendra and it is disliked then the kendra is disliked. If something involve the yehudit and the yehudit replay the kendra then the yehudit severalise the kendra. The kendra severalise the kendra.", "logic": "\nInvolve(yehudit, kendra)\nDisliked(yehudit)\nUnmediated(yehudit)\nLovesick(yehudit)\nPrevenient(yehudit)\nMinor(yehudit)\nReplay(yehudit, kendra)\nSeveralise(yehudit, kendra)\nInvolve(kendra, yehudit)\nDisliked(kendra)\nUnmediated(kendra)\nPrevenient(kendra)\nMinor(kendra)\nReplay(kendra, yehudit)\nSeveralise(kendra, yehudit)\nforall x (Replay(x, kendra) -> Involve(x, kendra))\nforall x (Involve(x, kendra) -> Severalise(kendra, yehudit))\nforall x (Involve(x, kendra) -> Involve(kendra, yehudit))\nforall x (Replay(x, yehudit) and Unmediated(x) -> Severalise(x, kendra))\nforall x (Severalise(x, kendra) -> Replay(x, kendra))\nLovesick(kendra) and Disliked(kendra) -> Replay(kendra, yehudit)\nforall x (Severalise(x, kendra) and Disliked(x) -> Disliked(kendra))\nforall x (Involve(x, yehudit) and Replay(yehudit, kendra) -> Severalise(yehudit, kendra))\n\nSeveralise(kendra, kendra)\n\nReplay(kendra, yehudit) and Unmediated(kendra) and forall x (Replay(x, yehudit) and Unmediated(x) -> Severalise(x, kendra)) -> therefore Severalise(kendra, kendra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The stephenie suppress the sena. The stephenie is scowling. The stephenie is gratifying. The stephenie is dosed. The stephenie is chunky. The stephenie is effeminate. The stephenie ally the sena. The stephenie blinker the sena. The sena suppress the stephenie. The sena is scowling. The sena is gratifying. The sena is chunky. The sena is effeminate. The sena ally the stephenie. The sena blinker the stephenie. If something ally the sena then it suppress the sena. If something suppress the sena then the sena blinker the stephenie. If something suppress the sena then the sena suppress the stephenie. If something ally the stephenie and it is gratifying then it blinker the sena. If something blinker the sena then it ally the sena. If the sena is dosed and the sena is scowling then the sena ally the stephenie. If something blinker the sena and it is scowling then the sena is scowling. If something suppress the stephenie and the stephenie ally the sena then the stephenie blinker the sena. The sena does not see the sena.", "logic": "\nSuppress(stephenie, sena)\nScowling(stephenie)\nGratifying(stephenie)\nDosed(stephenie)\nChunky(stephenie)\nEffeminate(stephenie)\nAlly(stephenie, sena)\nBlinker(stephenie, sena)\nSuppress(sena, stephenie)\nScowling(sena)\nGratifying(sena)\nChunky(sena)\nEffeminate(sena)\nAlly(sena, stephenie)\nBlinker(sena, stephenie)\nforall x (Ally(x, sena) -> Suppress(x, sena))\nforall x (Suppress(x, sena) -> Blinker(sena, stephenie))\nforall x (Suppress(x, sena) -> Suppress(sena, stephenie))\nforall x (Ally(x, stephenie) and Gratifying(x) -> Blinker(x, sena))\nforall x (Blinker(x, sena) -> Ally(x, sena))\nDosed(sena) and Scowling(sena) -> Ally(sena, stephenie)\nforall x (Blinker(x, sena) and Scowling(x) -> Scowling(sena))\nforall x (Suppress(x, stephenie) and Ally(stephenie, sena) -> Blinker(stephenie, sena))\n\nnot Blinker(sena, sena)\n\nAlly(sena, stephenie) and Gratifying(sena) and forall x (Ally(x, stephenie) and Gratifying(x) -> Blinker(x, sena)) -> therefore Blinker(sena, sena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The raven satisfise the shelly. The raven is awestruck. The raven is flawless. The raven is affiliated. The raven is cerebral. The raven is grayish. The raven dice the shelly. The raven pronate the shelly. The shelly satisfise the raven. The shelly is awestruck. The shelly is flawless. The shelly is cerebral. The shelly is grayish. The shelly dice the raven. The shelly pronate the raven. If something dice the shelly then it satisfise the shelly. If something satisfise the shelly then the shelly pronate the raven. If something satisfise the shelly then the shelly satisfise the raven. If something dice the raven and it is flawless then it pronate the shelly. If something pronate the shelly then it dice the shelly. If the shelly is affiliated and the shelly is awestruck then the shelly dice the raven. If something pronate the shelly and it is awestruck then the shelly is awestruck. If something satisfise the raven and the raven dice the shelly then the raven pronate the shelly. The shelly dice the shelly.", "logic": "\nSatisfise(raven, shelly)\nAwestruck(raven)\nFlawless(raven)\nAffiliated(raven)\nCerebral(raven)\nGrayish(raven)\nDice(raven, shelly)\nPronate(raven, shelly)\nSatisfise(shelly, raven)\nAwestruck(shelly)\nFlawless(shelly)\nCerebral(shelly)\nGrayish(shelly)\nDice(shelly, raven)\nPronate(shelly, raven)\nforall x (Dice(x, shelly) -> Satisfise(x, shelly))\nforall x (Satisfise(x, shelly) -> Pronate(shelly, raven))\nforall x (Satisfise(x, shelly) -> Satisfise(shelly, raven))\nforall x (Dice(x, raven) and Flawless(x) -> Pronate(x, shelly))\nforall x (Pronate(x, shelly) -> Dice(x, shelly))\nAffiliated(shelly) and Awestruck(shelly) -> Dice(shelly, raven)\nforall x (Pronate(x, shelly) and Awestruck(x) -> Awestruck(shelly))\nforall x (Satisfise(x, raven) and Dice(raven, shelly) -> Pronate(raven, shelly))\n\nDice(shelly, shelly)\n\nDice(shelly, raven) and Flawless(shelly) and forall x (Dice(x, raven) and Flawless(x) -> Pronate(x, shelly)) -> therefore Pronate(shelly, shelly) Pronate(shelly, shelly) and forall x (Pronate(x, shelly) -> Dice(x, shelly)) -> therefore Dice(shelly, shelly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The janot dragoon the maye. The janot is jutting. The janot is trilingual. The janot is unhallowed. The janot is anile. The janot is opposite. The janot etherify the maye. The janot murk the maye. The maye dragoon the janot. The maye is jutting. The maye is trilingual. The maye is anile. The maye is opposite. The maye etherify the janot. The maye murk the janot. If something etherify the maye then it dragoon the maye. If something dragoon the maye then the maye murk the janot. If something dragoon the maye then the maye dragoon the janot. If something etherify the janot and it is trilingual then it murk the maye. If something murk the maye then it etherify the maye. If the maye is unhallowed and the maye is jutting then the maye etherify the janot. If something murk the maye and it is jutting then the maye is jutting. If something dragoon the janot and the janot etherify the maye then the janot murk the maye. The maye does not need the maye.", "logic": "\nDragoon(janot, maye)\nJutting(janot)\nTrilingual(janot)\nUnhallowed(janot)\nAnile(janot)\nOpposite(janot)\nEtherify(janot, maye)\nMurk(janot, maye)\nDragoon(maye, janot)\nJutting(maye)\nTrilingual(maye)\nAnile(maye)\nOpposite(maye)\nEtherify(maye, janot)\nMurk(maye, janot)\nforall x (Etherify(x, maye) -> Dragoon(x, maye))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, maye) -> Murk(maye, janot))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, maye) -> Dragoon(maye, janot))\nforall x (Etherify(x, janot) and Trilingual(x) -> Murk(x, maye))\nforall x (Murk(x, maye) -> Etherify(x, maye))\nUnhallowed(maye) and Jutting(maye) -> Etherify(maye, janot)\nforall x (Murk(x, maye) and Jutting(x) -> Jutting(maye))\nforall x (Dragoon(x, janot) and Etherify(janot, maye) -> Murk(janot, maye))\n\nnot Etherify(maye, maye)\n\nEtherify(maye, janot) and Trilingual(maye) and forall x (Etherify(x, janot) and Trilingual(x) -> Murk(x, maye)) -> therefore Murk(maye, maye) Murk(maye, maye) and forall x (Murk(x, maye) -> Etherify(x, maye)) -> therefore Etherify(maye, maye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The stephana best the tammi. The stephana is toothed. The stephana is highborn. The stephana is flaunty. The stephana is stupefied. The stephana is alchemic. The stephana polemicize the tammi. The stephana please the tammi. The tammi best the stephana. The tammi is toothed. The tammi is highborn. The tammi is stupefied. The tammi is alchemic. The tammi polemicize the stephana. The tammi please the stephana. If something polemicize the tammi then it best the tammi. If something best the tammi then the tammi please the stephana. If something best the tammi then the tammi best the stephana. If something polemicize the stephana and it is highborn then it please the tammi. If something please the tammi then it polemicize the tammi. If the tammi is flaunty and the tammi is toothed then the tammi polemicize the stephana. If something please the tammi and it is toothed then the tammi is toothed. If something best the stephana and the stephana polemicize the tammi then the stephana please the tammi. The tammi best the tammi.", "logic": "\nBest(stephana, tammi)\nToothed(stephana)\nHighborn(stephana)\nFlaunty(stephana)\nStupefied(stephana)\nAlchemic(stephana)\nPolemicize(stephana, tammi)\nPlease(stephana, tammi)\nBest(tammi, stephana)\nToothed(tammi)\nHighborn(tammi)\nStupefied(tammi)\nAlchemic(tammi)\nPolemicize(tammi, stephana)\nPlease(tammi, stephana)\nforall x (Polemicize(x, tammi) -> Best(x, tammi))\nforall x (Best(x, tammi) -> Please(tammi, stephana))\nforall x (Best(x, tammi) -> Best(tammi, stephana))\nforall x (Polemicize(x, stephana) and Highborn(x) -> Please(x, tammi))\nforall x (Please(x, tammi) -> Polemicize(x, tammi))\nFlaunty(tammi) and Toothed(tammi) -> Polemicize(tammi, stephana)\nforall x (Please(x, tammi) and Toothed(x) -> Toothed(tammi))\nforall x (Best(x, stephana) and Polemicize(stephana, tammi) -> Please(stephana, tammi))\n\nBest(tammi, tammi)\n\nPolemicize(tammi, stephana) and Highborn(tammi) and forall x (Polemicize(x, stephana) and Highborn(x) -> Please(x, tammi)) -> therefore Please(tammi, tammi) Please(tammi, tammi) and forall x (Please(x, tammi) -> Polemicize(x, tammi)) -> therefore Polemicize(tammi, tammi) Polemicize(tammi, tammi) and forall x (Polemicize(x, tammi) -> Best(x, tammi)) -> therefore Best(tammi, tammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The denice systemise the tricia. The denice is gormless. The denice is secondhand. The denice is ovine. The denice is artesian. The denice is rubber. The denice elocute the tricia. The denice plagiarize the tricia. The tricia systemise the denice. The tricia is gormless. The tricia is secondhand. The tricia is artesian. The tricia is rubber. The tricia elocute the denice. The tricia plagiarize the denice. If something elocute the tricia then it systemise the tricia. If something systemise the tricia then the tricia plagiarize the denice. If something systemise the tricia then the tricia systemise the denice. If something elocute the denice and it is secondhand then it plagiarize the tricia. If something plagiarize the tricia then it elocute the tricia. If the tricia is ovine and the tricia is gormless then the tricia elocute the denice. If something plagiarize the tricia and it is gormless then the tricia is gormless. If something systemise the denice and the denice elocute the tricia then the denice plagiarize the tricia. The tricia does not eat the tricia.", "logic": "\nSystemise(denice, tricia)\nGormless(denice)\nSecondhand(denice)\nOvine(denice)\nArtesian(denice)\nRubber(denice)\nElocute(denice, tricia)\nPlagiarize(denice, tricia)\nSystemise(tricia, denice)\nGormless(tricia)\nSecondhand(tricia)\nArtesian(tricia)\nRubber(tricia)\nElocute(tricia, denice)\nPlagiarize(tricia, denice)\nforall x (Elocute(x, tricia) -> Systemise(x, tricia))\nforall x (Systemise(x, tricia) -> Plagiarize(tricia, denice))\nforall x (Systemise(x, tricia) -> Systemise(tricia, denice))\nforall x (Elocute(x, denice) and Secondhand(x) -> Plagiarize(x, tricia))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, tricia) -> Elocute(x, tricia))\nOvine(tricia) and Gormless(tricia) -> Elocute(tricia, denice)\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, tricia) and Gormless(x) -> Gormless(tricia))\nforall x (Systemise(x, denice) and Elocute(denice, tricia) -> Plagiarize(denice, tricia))\n\nnot Systemise(tricia, tricia)\n\nElocute(tricia, denice) and Secondhand(tricia) and forall x (Elocute(x, denice) and Secondhand(x) -> Plagiarize(x, tricia)) -> therefore Plagiarize(tricia, tricia) Plagiarize(tricia, tricia) and forall x (Plagiarize(x, tricia) -> Elocute(x, tricia)) -> therefore Elocute(tricia, tricia) Elocute(tricia, tricia) and forall x (Elocute(x, tricia) -> Systemise(x, tricia)) -> therefore Systemise(tricia, tricia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The benjie ruffle the welch. The benjie is pilary. The benjie is cellulosid. The benjie is micro. The benjie is acerbic. The benjie is molded. The benjie buzz the welch. The benjie earmark the welch. The welch ruffle the benjie. The welch is pilary. The welch is cellulosid. The welch is acerbic. The welch is molded. The welch buzz the benjie. The welch earmark the benjie. If something buzz the welch then it ruffle the welch. If something ruffle the welch then the welch earmark the benjie. If something ruffle the welch then the welch ruffle the benjie. If something buzz the benjie and it is cellulosid then it earmark the welch. If something earmark the welch then it buzz the welch. If the welch is micro and the welch is pilary then the welch buzz the benjie. If something earmark the welch and it is pilary then the welch is pilary. If something ruffle the benjie and the benjie buzz the welch then the benjie earmark the welch. The benjie does not eat the benjie.", "logic": "\nRuffle(benjie, welch)\nPilary(benjie)\nCellulosid(benjie)\nMicro(benjie)\nAcerbic(benjie)\nMolded(benjie)\nBuzz(benjie, welch)\nEarmark(benjie, welch)\nRuffle(welch, benjie)\nPilary(welch)\nCellulosid(welch)\nAcerbic(welch)\nMolded(welch)\nBuzz(welch, benjie)\nEarmark(welch, benjie)\nforall x (Buzz(x, welch) -> Ruffle(x, welch))\nforall x (Ruffle(x, welch) -> Earmark(welch, benjie))\nforall x (Ruffle(x, welch) -> Ruffle(welch, benjie))\nforall x (Buzz(x, benjie) and Cellulosid(x) -> Earmark(x, welch))\nforall x (Earmark(x, welch) -> Buzz(x, welch))\nMicro(welch) and Pilary(welch) -> Buzz(welch, benjie)\nforall x (Earmark(x, welch) and Pilary(x) -> Pilary(welch))\nforall x (Ruffle(x, benjie) and Buzz(benjie, welch) -> Earmark(benjie, welch))\n\nnot Ruffle(benjie, benjie)\n\nnot Ruffle(benjie, benjie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The gredel confront the elias. The gredel is boss. The gredel is cinematic. The gredel is phobic. The gredel is normative. The gredel is serflike. The gredel doss the elias. The gredel crawl the elias. The elias confront the gredel. The elias is boss. The elias is cinematic. The elias is normative. The elias is serflike. The elias doss the gredel. The elias crawl the gredel. If something doss the elias then it confront the elias. If something confront the elias then the elias crawl the gredel. If something confront the elias then the elias confront the gredel. If something doss the gredel and it is cinematic then it crawl the elias. If something crawl the elias then it doss the elias. If the elias is phobic and the elias is boss then the elias doss the gredel. If something crawl the elias and it is boss then the elias is boss. If something confront the gredel and the gredel doss the elias then the gredel crawl the elias. The gredel doss the gredel.", "logic": "\nConfront(gredel, elias)\nBoss(gredel)\nCinematic(gredel)\nPhobic(gredel)\nNormative(gredel)\nSerflike(gredel)\nDoss(gredel, elias)\nCrawl(gredel, elias)\nConfront(elias, gredel)\nBoss(elias)\nCinematic(elias)\nNormative(elias)\nSerflike(elias)\nDoss(elias, gredel)\nCrawl(elias, gredel)\nforall x (Doss(x, elias) -> Confront(x, elias))\nforall x (Confront(x, elias) -> Crawl(elias, gredel))\nforall x (Confront(x, elias) -> Confront(elias, gredel))\nforall x (Doss(x, gredel) and Cinematic(x) -> Crawl(x, elias))\nforall x (Crawl(x, elias) -> Doss(x, elias))\nPhobic(elias) and Boss(elias) -> Doss(elias, gredel)\nforall x (Crawl(x, elias) and Boss(x) -> Boss(elias))\nforall x (Confront(x, gredel) and Doss(gredel, elias) -> Crawl(gredel, elias))\n\nDoss(gredel, gredel)\n\nDoss(gredel, gredel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The catarina immunise the ansley. The catarina is athletic. The catarina is pretorian. The catarina is helpless. The catarina is feigned. The catarina is sterling. The catarina sensify the ansley. The catarina intumesce the ansley. The ansley immunise the catarina. The ansley is athletic. The ansley is pretorian. The ansley is feigned. The ansley is sterling. The ansley sensify the catarina. The ansley intumesce the catarina. If something sensify the ansley then it immunise the ansley. If something immunise the ansley then the ansley intumesce the catarina. If something immunise the ansley then the ansley immunise the catarina. If something sensify the catarina and it is pretorian then it intumesce the ansley. If something intumesce the ansley then it sensify the ansley. If the ansley is helpless and the ansley is athletic then the ansley sensify the catarina. If something intumesce the ansley and it is athletic then the ansley is athletic. If something immunise the catarina and the catarina sensify the ansley then the catarina intumesce the ansley. The catarina does not see the catarina.", "logic": "\nImmunise(catarina, ansley)\nAthletic(catarina)\nPretorian(catarina)\nHelpless(catarina)\nFeigned(catarina)\nSterling(catarina)\nSensify(catarina, ansley)\nIntumesce(catarina, ansley)\nImmunise(ansley, catarina)\nAthletic(ansley)\nPretorian(ansley)\nFeigned(ansley)\nSterling(ansley)\nSensify(ansley, catarina)\nIntumesce(ansley, catarina)\nforall x (Sensify(x, ansley) -> Immunise(x, ansley))\nforall x (Immunise(x, ansley) -> Intumesce(ansley, catarina))\nforall x (Immunise(x, ansley) -> Immunise(ansley, catarina))\nforall x (Sensify(x, catarina) and Pretorian(x) -> Intumesce(x, ansley))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, ansley) -> Sensify(x, ansley))\nHelpless(ansley) and Athletic(ansley) -> Sensify(ansley, catarina)\nforall x (Intumesce(x, ansley) and Athletic(x) -> Athletic(ansley))\nforall x (Immunise(x, catarina) and Sensify(catarina, ansley) -> Intumesce(catarina, ansley))\n\nnot Intumesce(catarina, catarina)\n\nnot Intumesce(catarina, catarina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The lyndsay snare the tabbi. The lyndsay is reeking. The lyndsay is phocine. The lyndsay is cuban. The lyndsay is unshaken. The lyndsay is semihard. The lyndsay spiral the tabbi. The lyndsay dissemble the tabbi. The tabbi snare the lyndsay. The tabbi is reeking. The tabbi is phocine. The tabbi is unshaken. The tabbi is semihard. The tabbi spiral the lyndsay. The tabbi dissemble the lyndsay. If something spiral the tabbi then it snare the tabbi. If something snare the tabbi then the tabbi dissemble the lyndsay. If something snare the tabbi then the tabbi snare the lyndsay. If something spiral the lyndsay and it is phocine then it dissemble the tabbi. If something dissemble the tabbi then it spiral the tabbi. If the tabbi is cuban and the tabbi is reeking then the tabbi spiral the lyndsay. If something dissemble the tabbi and it is reeking then the tabbi is reeking. If something snare the lyndsay and the lyndsay spiral the tabbi then the lyndsay dissemble the tabbi. The tabbi is cuban.", "logic": "\nSnare(lyndsay, tabbi)\nReeking(lyndsay)\nPhocine(lyndsay)\nCuban(lyndsay)\nUnshaken(lyndsay)\nSemihard(lyndsay)\nSpiral(lyndsay, tabbi)\nDissemble(lyndsay, tabbi)\nSnare(tabbi, lyndsay)\nReeking(tabbi)\nPhocine(tabbi)\nUnshaken(tabbi)\nSemihard(tabbi)\nSpiral(tabbi, lyndsay)\nDissemble(tabbi, lyndsay)\nforall x (Spiral(x, tabbi) -> Snare(x, tabbi))\nforall x (Snare(x, tabbi) -> Dissemble(tabbi, lyndsay))\nforall x (Snare(x, tabbi) -> Snare(tabbi, lyndsay))\nforall x (Spiral(x, lyndsay) and Phocine(x) -> Dissemble(x, tabbi))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, tabbi) -> Spiral(x, tabbi))\nCuban(tabbi) and Reeking(tabbi) -> Spiral(tabbi, lyndsay)\nforall x (Dissemble(x, tabbi) and Reeking(x) -> Reeking(tabbi))\nforall x (Snare(x, lyndsay) and Spiral(lyndsay, tabbi) -> Dissemble(lyndsay, tabbi))\n\nCuban(tabbi)\n\nCuban(tabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "Cristen is lingual. Cristen is hindermost. Cristen is ready. Cristen is prepaid. Dulce is walleyed. Adriana is hindermost. Adriana is frowsty. Adriana is prepaid. Adger is unwrapped. Adger is prepaid. If someone is walleyed then they are ready. If someone is frowsty then they are lingual. If someone is ready then they are frowsty. Cristen is ready.", "logic": "\nLingual(cristen)\nHindermost(cristen)\nReady(cristen)\nPrepaid(cristen)\nWalleyed(dulce)\nHindermost(adriana)\nFrowsty(adriana)\nPrepaid(adriana)\nUnwrapped(adger)\nPrepaid(adger)\nforall x (Walleyed(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Frowsty(x) -> Lingual(x))\nforall x (Ready(x) -> Frowsty(x))\n\nReady(cristen)\n\ntherefore Ready(cristen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Bettye is xxxv. Bettye is incoming. Bettye is barbate. Bettye is lipless. Vena is kitschy. Hercules is incoming. Hercules is missionary. Hercules is lipless. Giffy is lancelike. Giffy is lipless. If someone is kitschy then they are barbate. If someone is missionary then they are xxxv. If someone is barbate then they are missionary. Bettye is not xxxv.", "logic": "\nXxxv(bettye)\nIncoming(bettye)\nBarbate(bettye)\nLipless(bettye)\nKitschy(vena)\nIncoming(hercules)\nMissionary(hercules)\nLipless(hercules)\nLancelike(giffy)\nLipless(giffy)\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Barbate(x))\nforall x (Missionary(x) -> Xxxv(x))\nforall x (Barbate(x) -> Missionary(x))\n\nnot Xxxv(bettye)\n\ntherefore Xxxv(bettye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Tremaine is bullnecked. Tremaine is bonelike. Tremaine is slav. Tremaine is arboriform. Fawn is meshuga. Harriet is bonelike. Harriet is monecious. Harriet is arboriform. Dorothy is hurtful. Dorothy is arboriform. If someone is meshuga then they are slav. If someone is monecious then they are bullnecked. If someone is slav then they are monecious. Tremaine is monecious.", "logic": "\nBullnecked(tremaine)\nBonelike(tremaine)\nSlav(tremaine)\nArboriform(tremaine)\nMeshuga(fawn)\nBonelike(harriet)\nMonecious(harriet)\nArboriform(harriet)\nHurtful(dorothy)\nArboriform(dorothy)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> Slav(x))\nforall x (Monecious(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Slav(x) -> Monecious(x))\n\nMonecious(tremaine)\n\nSlav(tremaine) and forall x (Slav(x) -> Monecious(x)) -> therefore Monecious(tremaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Fidelity is stealthy. Fidelity is brindled. Fidelity is nosy. Fidelity is somali. Silvio is depressing. Roger is brindled. Roger is thyroid. Roger is somali. Norton is boon. Norton is somali. If someone is depressing then they are nosy. If someone is thyroid then they are stealthy. If someone is nosy then they are thyroid. Fidelity is not thyroid.", "logic": "\nStealthy(fidelity)\nBrindled(fidelity)\nNosy(fidelity)\nSomali(fidelity)\nDepressing(silvio)\nBrindled(roger)\nThyroid(roger)\nSomali(roger)\nBoon(norton)\nSomali(norton)\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Nosy(x))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Nosy(x) -> Thyroid(x))\n\nnot Thyroid(fidelity)\n\nNosy(fidelity) and forall x (Nosy(x) -> Thyroid(x)) -> therefore Thyroid(fidelity)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Lilian is infatuated. Lilian is scandent. Lilian is vulvar. Lilian is double. Windy is squint. Orion is scandent. Orion is iritic. Orion is double. Almira is rivalrous. Almira is double. If someone is squint then they are vulvar. If someone is iritic then they are infatuated. If someone is vulvar then they are iritic. Windy is iritic.", "logic": "\nInfatuated(lilian)\nScandent(lilian)\nVulvar(lilian)\nDouble(lilian)\nSquint(windy)\nScandent(orion)\nIritic(orion)\nDouble(orion)\nRivalrous(almira)\nDouble(almira)\nforall x (Squint(x) -> Vulvar(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Infatuated(x))\nforall x (Vulvar(x) -> Iritic(x))\n\nIritic(windy)\n\nSquint(windy) and forall x (Squint(x) -> Vulvar(x)) -> therefore Vulvar(windy) Vulvar(windy) and forall x (Vulvar(x) -> Iritic(x)) -> therefore Iritic(windy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Kally is anorectic. Kally is anisogamic. Kally is classical. Kally is satisfied. Vivie is coital. Hephzibah is anisogamic. Hephzibah is amended. Hephzibah is satisfied. Ravi is shrill. Ravi is satisfied. If someone is coital then they are classical. If someone is amended then they are anorectic. If someone is classical then they are amended. Vivie is not amended.", "logic": "\nAnorectic(kally)\nAnisogamic(kally)\nClassical(kally)\nSatisfied(kally)\nCoital(vivie)\nAnisogamic(hephzibah)\nAmended(hephzibah)\nSatisfied(hephzibah)\nShrill(ravi)\nSatisfied(ravi)\nforall x (Coital(x) -> Classical(x))\nforall x (Amended(x) -> Anorectic(x))\nforall x (Classical(x) -> Amended(x))\n\nnot Amended(vivie)\n\nCoital(vivie) and forall x (Coital(x) -> Classical(x)) -> therefore Classical(vivie) Classical(vivie) and forall x (Classical(x) -> Amended(x)) -> therefore Amended(vivie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Torrey is courtly. Torrey is dimmed. Torrey is pestilent. Torrey is peroneal. Almeria is nitwitted. Jeniffer is dimmed. Jeniffer is inodorous. Jeniffer is peroneal. Carlisle is feudal. Carlisle is peroneal. If someone is nitwitted then they are pestilent. If someone is inodorous then they are courtly. If someone is pestilent then they are inodorous. Almeria is courtly.", "logic": "\nCourtly(torrey)\nDimmed(torrey)\nPestilent(torrey)\nPeroneal(torrey)\nNitwitted(almeria)\nDimmed(jeniffer)\nInodorous(jeniffer)\nPeroneal(jeniffer)\nFeudal(carlisle)\nPeroneal(carlisle)\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Pestilent(x))\nforall x (Inodorous(x) -> Courtly(x))\nforall x (Pestilent(x) -> Inodorous(x))\n\nCourtly(almeria)\n\nNitwitted(almeria) and forall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Pestilent(x)) -> therefore Pestilent(almeria) Pestilent(almeria) and forall x (Pestilent(x) -> Inodorous(x)) -> therefore Inodorous(almeria) Inodorous(almeria) and forall x (Inodorous(x) -> Courtly(x)) -> therefore Courtly(almeria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Mordecai is postpartum. Mordecai is underway. Mordecai is definite. Mordecai is phrenetic. Andra is vegetative. Eveline is underway. Eveline is fringy. Eveline is phrenetic. Padraig is agamic. Padraig is phrenetic. If someone is vegetative then they are definite. If someone is fringy then they are postpartum. If someone is definite then they are fringy. Andra is not postpartum.", "logic": "\nPostpartum(mordecai)\nUnderway(mordecai)\nDefinite(mordecai)\nPhrenetic(mordecai)\nVegetative(andra)\nUnderway(eveline)\nFringy(eveline)\nPhrenetic(eveline)\nAgamic(padraig)\nPhrenetic(padraig)\nforall x (Vegetative(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Fringy(x) -> Postpartum(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) -> Fringy(x))\n\nnot Postpartum(andra)\n\nVegetative(andra) and forall x (Vegetative(x) -> Definite(x)) -> therefore Definite(andra) Definite(andra) and forall x (Definite(x) -> Fringy(x)) -> therefore Fringy(andra) Fringy(andra) and forall x (Fringy(x) -> Postpartum(x)) -> therefore Postpartum(andra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Linn is gentile. Linn is adjectival. Linn is ninety. Linn is acerb. Archon is abiding. Jude is adjectival. Jude is rigged. Jude is acerb. Gabriello is brittle. Gabriello is acerb. If someone is abiding then they are ninety. If someone is rigged then they are gentile. If someone is ninety then they are rigged. Gabriello is not gentile.", "logic": "\nGentile(linn)\nAdjectival(linn)\nNinety(linn)\nAcerb(linn)\nAbiding(archon)\nAdjectival(jude)\nRigged(jude)\nAcerb(jude)\nBrittle(gabriello)\nAcerb(gabriello)\nforall x (Abiding(x) -> Ninety(x))\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> Gentile(x))\nforall x (Ninety(x) -> Rigged(x))\n\nnot Gentile(gabriello)\n\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> Gentile(x)) <- forall x (Ninety(x) -> Rigged(x)) <- forall x (Abiding(x) -> Ninety(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Dannye is emotional. Dannye is eighty. Dannye is jittery. Dannye is dire. Matteo is posthumous. Florina is eighty. Florina is corymbose. Florina is dire. Tate is glaucous. Tate is dire. If someone is posthumous then they are jittery. If someone is corymbose then they are emotional. If someone is jittery then they are corymbose. Tate is jittery.", "logic": "\nEmotional(dannye)\nEighty(dannye)\nJittery(dannye)\nDire(dannye)\nPosthumous(matteo)\nEighty(florina)\nCorymbose(florina)\nDire(florina)\nGlaucous(tate)\nDire(tate)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Jittery(x))\nforall x (Corymbose(x) -> Emotional(x))\nforall x (Jittery(x) -> Corymbose(x))\n\nJittery(tate)\n\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Jittery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Connie is foliose. Connie is endangered. Connie is botonee. Connie is rescued. Mandy is niggardly. Tremaine is endangered. Tremaine is insectan. Tremaine is rescued. Rodolfo is caespitose. Rodolfo is rescued. If someone is niggardly then they are botonee. If someone is insectan then they are foliose. If someone is botonee then they are insectan. Rodolfo is not insectan.", "logic": "\nFoliose(connie)\nEndangered(connie)\nBotonee(connie)\nRescued(connie)\nNiggardly(mandy)\nEndangered(tremaine)\nInsectan(tremaine)\nRescued(tremaine)\nCaespitose(rodolfo)\nRescued(rodolfo)\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Botonee(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) -> Foliose(x))\nforall x (Botonee(x) -> Insectan(x))\n\nnot Insectan(rodolfo)\n\nforall x (Botonee(x) -> Insectan(x)) <- forall x (Niggardly(x) -> Botonee(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Romola is azure. Romola is preteen. Romola is chargeable. Romola is woody. Ede is antiblack. Katee is preteen. Katee is punitory. Katee is woody. Gallagher is resonating. Gallagher is woody. If someone is antiblack then they are chargeable. If someone is punitory then they are azure. If someone is chargeable then they are punitory. Katee is chargeable.", "logic": "\nAzure(romola)\nPreteen(romola)\nChargeable(romola)\nWoody(romola)\nAntiblack(ede)\nPreteen(katee)\nPunitory(katee)\nWoody(katee)\nResonating(gallagher)\nWoody(gallagher)\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Punitory(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Chargeable(x) -> Punitory(x))\n\nChargeable(katee)\n\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Chargeable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Walker is lascivious. Walker is tobagonian. Walker is enervated. Walker is tympanitic. Helmuth is equanimous. Hanni is tobagonian. Hanni is aphanitic. Hanni is tympanitic. Carmine is ovular. Carmine is tympanitic. If someone is equanimous then they are enervated. If someone is aphanitic then they are lascivious. If someone is enervated then they are aphanitic. Hanni is not equanimous.", "logic": "\nLascivious(walker)\nTobagonian(walker)\nEnervated(walker)\nTympanitic(walker)\nEquanimous(helmuth)\nTobagonian(hanni)\nAphanitic(hanni)\nTympanitic(hanni)\nOvular(carmine)\nTympanitic(carmine)\nforall x (Equanimous(x) -> Enervated(x))\nforall x (Aphanitic(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Aphanitic(x))\n\nnot Equanimous(hanni)\n\nnot Equanimous(hanni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Callie is funky. Callie is unnamed. Callie is crummy. Callie is blameful. Ginelle is blurred. Dorena is unnamed. Dorena is apodous. Dorena is blameful. Selene is completed. Selene is blameful. If someone is blurred then they are crummy. If someone is apodous then they are funky. If someone is crummy then they are apodous. Callie is blurred.", "logic": "\nFunky(callie)\nUnnamed(callie)\nCrummy(callie)\nBlameful(callie)\nBlurred(ginelle)\nUnnamed(dorena)\nApodous(dorena)\nBlameful(dorena)\nCompleted(selene)\nBlameful(selene)\nforall x (Blurred(x) -> Crummy(x))\nforall x (Apodous(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Apodous(x))\n\nBlurred(callie)\n\nBlurred(callie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Rahal is surly. Rahal is unionised. Rahal is annelid. Rahal is corrupting. Cecilia is worshipful. Wilden is unionised. Wilden is broadside. Wilden is corrupting. Luanna is feverish. Luanna is corrupting. If someone is worshipful then they are annelid. If someone is broadside then they are surly. If someone is annelid then they are broadside. Cecilia is not unionised.", "logic": "\nSurly(rahal)\nUnionised(rahal)\nAnnelid(rahal)\nCorrupting(rahal)\nWorshipful(cecilia)\nUnionised(wilden)\nBroadside(wilden)\nCorrupting(wilden)\nFeverish(luanna)\nCorrupting(luanna)\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Annelid(x))\nforall x (Broadside(x) -> Surly(x))\nforall x (Annelid(x) -> Broadside(x))\n\nnot Unionised(cecilia)\n\nnot Unionised(cecilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Berni is sonsy. Berni is lost. Berni is gestural. Berni is touched. Osmond is multilane. Pavel is lost. Pavel is catamenial. Pavel is touched. Norene is synoicous. Norene is touched. If someone is multilane then they are gestural. If someone is catamenial then they are sonsy. If someone is gestural then they are catamenial. Osmond is synoicous.", "logic": "\nSonsy(berni)\nLost(berni)\nGestural(berni)\nTouched(berni)\nMultilane(osmond)\nLost(pavel)\nCatamenial(pavel)\nTouched(pavel)\nSynoicous(norene)\nTouched(norene)\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Gestural(x))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Sonsy(x))\nforall x (Gestural(x) -> Catamenial(x))\n\nSynoicous(osmond)\n\nSynoicous(osmond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "The siobhan is erasable. If something is erasable then it is medium. Cold, medium things are paternal. All paternal, medium things are antenatal. If the siobhan is medium and the siobhan is antenatal then the siobhan is paternal. All medium things are erasable. All smiling, medium things are antenatal. All paternal things are medium. Big, paternal things are antenatal. The siobhan is erasable.", "logic": "\nErasable(siobhan)\nforall x (Erasable(x) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Erasable(x) and Medium(x) -> Paternal(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) and Medium(x) -> Antenatal(x))\nMedium(siobhan) and Antenatal(siobhan) -> Paternal(siobhan)\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Smiling(x) and Medium(x) -> Antenatal(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Smiling(x) and Paternal(x) -> Antenatal(x))\n\nErasable(siobhan)\n\ntherefore Erasable(siobhan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The codi is toned. If something is toned then it is caesarian. Cold, caesarian things are superior. All superior, caesarian things are biconcave. If the codi is caesarian and the codi is biconcave then the codi is superior. All caesarian things are toned. All clubbish, caesarian things are biconcave. All superior things are caesarian. Big, superior things are biconcave. The codi is not toned.", "logic": "\nToned(codi)\nforall x (Toned(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Toned(x) and Caesarian(x) -> Superior(x))\nforall x (Superior(x) and Caesarian(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nCaesarian(codi) and Biconcave(codi) -> Superior(codi)\nforall x (Caesarian(x) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) and Caesarian(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nforall x (Superior(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) and Superior(x) -> Biconcave(x))\n\nnot Toned(codi)\n\ntherefore Toned(codi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The melessa is speechless. If something is speechless then it is cranial. Cold, cranial things are hagridden. All hagridden, cranial things are insolvent. If the melessa is cranial and the melessa is insolvent then the melessa is hagridden. All cranial things are speechless. All vocalic, cranial things are insolvent. All hagridden things are cranial. Big, hagridden things are insolvent. The melessa is cranial.", "logic": "\nSpeechless(melessa)\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Speechless(x) and Cranial(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nforall x (Hagridden(x) and Cranial(x) -> Insolvent(x))\nCranial(melessa) and Insolvent(melessa) -> Hagridden(melessa)\nforall x (Cranial(x) -> Speechless(x))\nforall x (Vocalic(x) and Cranial(x) -> Insolvent(x))\nforall x (Hagridden(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Vocalic(x) and Hagridden(x) -> Insolvent(x))\n\nCranial(melessa)\n\nSpeechless(melessa) and forall x (Speechless(x) -> Cranial(x)) -> therefore Cranial(melessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The fleming is antenatal. If something is antenatal then it is birch. Cold, birch things are homeless. All homeless, birch things are peripheral. If the fleming is birch and the fleming is peripheral then the fleming is homeless. All birch things are antenatal. All gauche, birch things are peripheral. All homeless things are birch. Big, homeless things are peripheral. The fleming is not birch.", "logic": "\nAntenatal(fleming)\nforall x (Antenatal(x) -> Birch(x))\nforall x (Antenatal(x) and Birch(x) -> Homeless(x))\nforall x (Homeless(x) and Birch(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nBirch(fleming) and Peripheral(fleming) -> Homeless(fleming)\nforall x (Birch(x) -> Antenatal(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Birch(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nforall x (Homeless(x) -> Birch(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Homeless(x) -> Peripheral(x))\n\nnot Birch(fleming)\n\nAntenatal(fleming) and forall x (Antenatal(x) -> Birch(x)) -> therefore Birch(fleming)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The deanne is bigmouthed. If something is bigmouthed then it is tensile. Cold, tensile things are prescribed. All prescribed, tensile things are gullible. If the deanne is tensile and the deanne is gullible then the deanne is prescribed. All tensile things are bigmouthed. All clunky, tensile things are gullible. All prescribed things are tensile. Big, prescribed things are gullible. The deanne is prescribed.", "logic": "\nBigmouthed(deanne)\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) and Tensile(x) -> Prescribed(x))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and Tensile(x) -> Gullible(x))\nTensile(deanne) and Gullible(deanne) -> Prescribed(deanne)\nforall x (Tensile(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nforall x (Clunky(x) and Tensile(x) -> Gullible(x))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Clunky(x) and Prescribed(x) -> Gullible(x))\n\nPrescribed(deanne)\n\nBigmouthed(deanne) and forall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Tensile(x)) -> therefore Tensile(deanne) Bigmouthed(deanne) and Tensile(deanne) and forall x (Bigmouthed(x) and Tensile(x) -> Prescribed(x)) -> therefore Prescribed(deanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The lyndon is tigerish. If something is tigerish then it is amino. Cold, amino things are base. All base, amino things are puerperal. If the lyndon is amino and the lyndon is puerperal then the lyndon is base. All amino things are tigerish. All nonnatural, amino things are puerperal. All base things are amino. Big, base things are puerperal. The lyndon is not base.", "logic": "\nTigerish(lyndon)\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Amino(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) and Amino(x) -> Base(x))\nforall x (Base(x) and Amino(x) -> Puerperal(x))\nAmino(lyndon) and Puerperal(lyndon) -> Base(lyndon)\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Amino(x) -> Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Base(x) -> Amino(x))\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Base(x) -> Puerperal(x))\n\nnot Base(lyndon)\n\nTigerish(lyndon) and forall x (Tigerish(x) -> Amino(x)) -> therefore Amino(lyndon) Tigerish(lyndon) and Amino(lyndon) and forall x (Tigerish(x) and Amino(x) -> Base(x)) -> therefore Base(lyndon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The jarrett is gardant. If something is gardant then it is unbent. Cold, unbent things are bacchic. All bacchic, unbent things are cantonal. If the jarrett is unbent and the jarrett is cantonal then the jarrett is bacchic. All unbent things are gardant. All pregnant, unbent things are cantonal. All bacchic things are unbent. Big, bacchic things are cantonal. The jarrett is cantonal.", "logic": "\nGardant(jarrett)\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> Unbent(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) and Unbent(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Unbent(x) -> Cantonal(x))\nUnbent(jarrett) and Cantonal(jarrett) -> Bacchic(jarrett)\nforall x (Unbent(x) -> Gardant(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) and Unbent(x) -> Cantonal(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) -> Unbent(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) and Bacchic(x) -> Cantonal(x))\n\nCantonal(jarrett)\n\nGardant(jarrett) and forall x (Gardant(x) -> Unbent(x)) -> therefore Unbent(jarrett) Gardant(jarrett) and Unbent(jarrett) and forall x (Gardant(x) and Unbent(x) -> Bacchic(x)) -> therefore Bacchic(jarrett) Gardant(jarrett) and forall x (Gardant(x) -> Unbent(x)) -> therefore Unbent(jarrett) Bacchic(jarrett) and Unbent(jarrett) and forall x (Bacchic(x) and Unbent(x) -> Cantonal(x)) -> therefore Cantonal(jarrett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The cherice is bacteroid. If something is bacteroid then it is caecal. Cold, caecal things are hindering. All hindering, caecal things are ventricose. If the cherice is caecal and the cherice is ventricose then the cherice is hindering. All caecal things are bacteroid. All stomachic, caecal things are ventricose. All hindering things are caecal. Big, hindering things are ventricose. The cherice is not ventricose.", "logic": "\nBacteroid(cherice)\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) and Caecal(x) -> Hindering(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) and Caecal(x) -> Ventricose(x))\nCaecal(cherice) and Ventricose(cherice) -> Hindering(cherice)\nforall x (Caecal(x) -> Bacteroid(x))\nforall x (Stomachic(x) and Caecal(x) -> Ventricose(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Stomachic(x) and Hindering(x) -> Ventricose(x))\n\nnot Ventricose(cherice)\n\nBacteroid(cherice) and forall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Caecal(x)) -> therefore Caecal(cherice) Bacteroid(cherice) and Caecal(cherice) and forall x (Bacteroid(x) and Caecal(x) -> Hindering(x)) -> therefore Hindering(cherice) Bacteroid(cherice) and forall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Caecal(x)) -> therefore Caecal(cherice) Hindering(cherice) and Caecal(cherice) and forall x (Hindering(x) and Caecal(x) -> Ventricose(x)) -> therefore Ventricose(cherice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The alberto is unmapped. If something is unmapped then it is auctorial. Cold, auctorial things are puckish. All puckish, auctorial things are clarifying. If the alberto is auctorial and the alberto is clarifying then the alberto is puckish. All auctorial things are unmapped. All bosomy, auctorial things are clarifying. All puckish things are auctorial. Big, puckish things are clarifying. The alberto does not chase the alberto.", "logic": "\nUnmapped(alberto)\nforall x (Unmapped(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nforall x (Unmapped(x) and Auctorial(x) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) and Auctorial(x) -> Clarifying(x))\nAuctorial(alberto) and Clarifying(alberto) -> Puckish(alberto)\nforall x (Auctorial(x) -> Unmapped(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and Auctorial(x) -> Clarifying(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and Puckish(x) -> Clarifying(x))\n\nnot Chases(alberto, alberto)\n\nnot Chases(alberto, alberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The francisca is extremist. If something is extremist then it is branchy. Cold, branchy things are enchanted. All enchanted, branchy things are esurient. If the francisca is branchy and the francisca is esurient then the francisca is enchanted. All branchy things are extremist. All pyrrhic, branchy things are esurient. All enchanted things are branchy. Big, enchanted things are esurient. The francisca needs the francisca.", "logic": "\nExtremist(francisca)\nforall x (Extremist(x) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Extremist(x) and Branchy(x) -> Enchanted(x))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) and Branchy(x) -> Esurient(x))\nBranchy(francisca) and Esurient(francisca) -> Enchanted(francisca)\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Extremist(x))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) and Branchy(x) -> Esurient(x))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) and Enchanted(x) -> Esurient(x))\n\nNeeds(francisca, francisca)\n\nNeeds(francisca, francisca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The roseline is focused. If something is focused then it is untuneful. Cold, untuneful things are cyclonal. All cyclonal, untuneful things are columnar. If the roseline is untuneful and the roseline is columnar then the roseline is cyclonal. All untuneful things are focused. All sizeable, untuneful things are columnar. All cyclonal things are untuneful. Big, cyclonal things are columnar. The roseline does not visit the roseline.", "logic": "\nFocused(roseline)\nforall x (Focused(x) -> Untuneful(x))\nforall x (Focused(x) and Untuneful(x) -> Cyclonal(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) and Untuneful(x) -> Columnar(x))\nUntuneful(roseline) and Columnar(roseline) -> Cyclonal(roseline)\nforall x (Untuneful(x) -> Focused(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) and Untuneful(x) -> Columnar(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) -> Untuneful(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) and Cyclonal(x) -> Columnar(x))\n\nnot Visits(roseline, roseline)\n\nnot Visits(roseline, roseline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The coriss is diaphysial. If something is diaphysial then it is detested. Cold, detested things are hexagonal. All hexagonal, detested things are pyramidal. If the coriss is detested and the coriss is pyramidal then the coriss is hexagonal. All detested things are diaphysial. All unshapen, detested things are pyramidal. All hexagonal things are detested. Big, hexagonal things are pyramidal. The coriss is unshapen.", "logic": "\nDiaphysial(coriss)\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) and Detested(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) and Detested(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nDetested(coriss) and Pyramidal(coriss) -> Hexagonal(coriss)\nforall x (Detested(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) and Detested(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nforall x (Hexagonal(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) and Hexagonal(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\n\nUnshapen(coriss)\n\nUnshapen(coriss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "Halimeda is deweyan. Corene is unagitated. Mirabelle is sallow. Rissa is attachable. Green, sallow things are deweyan. Furry, attachable things are sallow. Young things are deweyan. If Mirabelle is voluted and Mirabelle is judaical then Mirabelle is deweyan. If something is sallow then it is voluted. If something is unagitated then it is attachable. Rissa is attachable.", "logic": "\nDeweyan(halimeda)\nUnagitated(corene)\nSallow(mirabelle)\nAttachable(rissa)\nforall x (Judaical(x) and Sallow(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Unagitated(x) and Attachable(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nVoluted(mirabelle) and Judaical(mirabelle) -> Deweyan(mirabelle)\nforall x (Sallow(x) -> Voluted(x))\nforall x (Unagitated(x) -> Attachable(x))\n\nAttachable(rissa)\n\ntherefore Attachable(rissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Hiram is resentful. Mandi is unthematic. Petunia is umbilical. Dodie is corporeal. Green, umbilical things are resentful. Furry, corporeal things are umbilical. Young things are resentful. If Petunia is plastered and Petunia is indecisive then Petunia is resentful. If something is umbilical then it is plastered. If something is unthematic then it is corporeal. Dodie is not corporeal.", "logic": "\nResentful(hiram)\nUnthematic(mandi)\nUmbilical(petunia)\nCorporeal(dodie)\nforall x (Indecisive(x) and Umbilical(x) -> Resentful(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) and Corporeal(x) -> Umbilical(x))\nforall x (Spotted(x) -> Resentful(x))\nPlastered(petunia) and Indecisive(petunia) -> Resentful(petunia)\nforall x (Umbilical(x) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Corporeal(x))\n\nnot Corporeal(dodie)\n\ntherefore Corporeal(dodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Marjie is relaxing. Clive is tuppeny. Roselin is nett. Ajay is kayoed. Green, nett things are relaxing. Furry, kayoed things are nett. Young things are relaxing. If Roselin is nineteenth and Roselin is studied then Roselin is relaxing. If something is nett then it is nineteenth. If something is tuppeny then it is kayoed. Clive is kayoed.", "logic": "\nRelaxing(marjie)\nTuppeny(clive)\nNett(roselin)\nKayoed(ajay)\nforall x (Studied(x) and Nett(x) -> Relaxing(x))\nforall x (Tuppeny(x) and Kayoed(x) -> Nett(x))\nforall x (Blatant(x) -> Relaxing(x))\nNineteenth(roselin) and Studied(roselin) -> Relaxing(roselin)\nforall x (Nett(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Tuppeny(x) -> Kayoed(x))\n\nKayoed(clive)\n\nTuppeny(clive) and forall x (Tuppeny(x) -> Kayoed(x)) -> therefore Kayoed(clive)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Piper is linelike. Mack is sheathed. Lacey is grave. Augusto is flinty. Green, grave things are linelike. Furry, flinty things are grave. Young things are linelike. If Lacey is gyral and Lacey is amerindic then Lacey is linelike. If something is grave then it is gyral. If something is sheathed then it is flinty. Mack is not flinty.", "logic": "\nLinelike(piper)\nSheathed(mack)\nGrave(lacey)\nFlinty(augusto)\nforall x (Amerindic(x) and Grave(x) -> Linelike(x))\nforall x (Sheathed(x) and Flinty(x) -> Grave(x))\nforall x (Blurred(x) -> Linelike(x))\nGyral(lacey) and Amerindic(lacey) -> Linelike(lacey)\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Gyral(x))\nforall x (Sheathed(x) -> Flinty(x))\n\nnot Flinty(mack)\n\nSheathed(mack) and forall x (Sheathed(x) -> Flinty(x)) -> therefore Flinty(mack)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Russell is comparable. Benson is spinose. Stanislaw is still. Betteanne is based. Green, still things are comparable. Furry, based things are still. Young things are comparable. If Stanislaw is salvific and Stanislaw is automatic then Stanislaw is comparable. If something is still then it is salvific. If something is spinose then it is based. Benson is still.", "logic": "\nComparable(russell)\nSpinose(benson)\nStill(stanislaw)\nBased(betteanne)\nforall x (Automatic(x) and Still(x) -> Comparable(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) and Based(x) -> Still(x))\nforall x (Fingered(x) -> Comparable(x))\nSalvific(stanislaw) and Automatic(stanislaw) -> Comparable(stanislaw)\nforall x (Still(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) -> Based(x))\n\nStill(benson)\n\nSpinose(benson) and forall x (Spinose(x) -> Based(x)) -> therefore Based(benson) Spinose(benson) and Based(benson) and forall x (Spinose(x) and Based(x) -> Still(x)) -> therefore Still(benson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Charmane is isothermal. Angelique is trivalent. Skippy is phonetic. Yevette is initiative. Green, phonetic things are isothermal. Furry, initiative things are phonetic. Young things are isothermal. If Skippy is braggy and Skippy is terminated then Skippy is isothermal. If something is phonetic then it is braggy. If something is trivalent then it is initiative. Angelique is not phonetic.", "logic": "\nIsothermal(charmane)\nTrivalent(angelique)\nPhonetic(skippy)\nInitiative(yevette)\nforall x (Terminated(x) and Phonetic(x) -> Isothermal(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) and Initiative(x) -> Phonetic(x))\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Isothermal(x))\nBraggy(skippy) and Terminated(skippy) -> Isothermal(skippy)\nforall x (Phonetic(x) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) -> Initiative(x))\n\nnot Phonetic(angelique)\n\nTrivalent(angelique) and forall x (Trivalent(x) -> Initiative(x)) -> therefore Initiative(angelique) Trivalent(angelique) and Initiative(angelique) and forall x (Trivalent(x) and Initiative(x) -> Phonetic(x)) -> therefore Phonetic(angelique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Gisella is apodous. Honor is structured. Ned is dastardly. Lem is feral. Green, dastardly things are apodous. Furry, feral things are dastardly. Young things are apodous. If Ned is spent and Ned is brainy then Ned is apodous. If something is dastardly then it is spent. If something is structured then it is feral. Honor is spent.", "logic": "\nApodous(gisella)\nStructured(honor)\nDastardly(ned)\nFeral(lem)\nforall x (Brainy(x) and Dastardly(x) -> Apodous(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) and Feral(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) -> Apodous(x))\nSpent(ned) and Brainy(ned) -> Apodous(ned)\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Spent(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) -> Feral(x))\n\nSpent(honor)\n\nStructured(honor) and forall x (Structured(x) -> Feral(x)) -> therefore Feral(honor) Structured(honor) and Feral(honor) and forall x (Structured(x) and Feral(x) -> Dastardly(x)) -> therefore Dastardly(honor) Dastardly(honor) and forall x (Dastardly(x) -> Spent(x)) -> therefore Spent(honor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Tatiana is outfitted. Veronica is reflex. Marris is castrated. Pavel is nitwitted. Green, castrated things are outfitted. Furry, nitwitted things are castrated. Young things are outfitted. If Marris is synoicous and Marris is grasslike then Marris is outfitted. If something is castrated then it is synoicous. If something is reflex then it is nitwitted. Veronica is not synoicous.", "logic": "\nOutfitted(tatiana)\nReflex(veronica)\nCastrated(marris)\nNitwitted(pavel)\nforall x (Grasslike(x) and Castrated(x) -> Outfitted(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Nitwitted(x) -> Castrated(x))\nforall x (Bipartite(x) -> Outfitted(x))\nSynoicous(marris) and Grasslike(marris) -> Outfitted(marris)\nforall x (Castrated(x) -> Synoicous(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) -> Nitwitted(x))\n\nnot Synoicous(veronica)\n\nReflex(veronica) and forall x (Reflex(x) -> Nitwitted(x)) -> therefore Nitwitted(veronica) Reflex(veronica) and Nitwitted(veronica) and forall x (Reflex(x) and Nitwitted(x) -> Castrated(x)) -> therefore Castrated(veronica) Castrated(veronica) and forall x (Castrated(x) -> Synoicous(x)) -> therefore Synoicous(veronica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Timothee is rheumatic. Candida is squared. Tito is mislaid. Marilin is iliac. Green, mislaid things are rheumatic. Furry, iliac things are mislaid. Young things are rheumatic. If Tito is untruthful and Tito is specious then Tito is rheumatic. If something is mislaid then it is untruthful. If something is squared then it is iliac. Tito is not rheumatic.", "logic": "\nRheumatic(timothee)\nSquared(candida)\nMislaid(tito)\nIliac(marilin)\nforall x (Specious(x) and Mislaid(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) and Iliac(x) -> Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\nUntruthful(tito) and Specious(tito) -> Rheumatic(tito)\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Iliac(x))\n\nnot Rheumatic(tito)\n\nforall x (Specious(x) and Mislaid(x) -> Rheumatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Ferdy is glycogenic. Therese is deliberate. Laurene is pliable. Craig is swollen. Green, pliable things are glycogenic. Furry, swollen things are pliable. Young things are glycogenic. If Laurene is biogenic and Laurene is clogged then Laurene is glycogenic. If something is pliable then it is biogenic. If something is deliberate then it is swollen. Ferdy is biogenic.", "logic": "\nGlycogenic(ferdy)\nDeliberate(therese)\nPliable(laurene)\nSwollen(craig)\nforall x (Clogged(x) and Pliable(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Deliberate(x) and Swollen(x) -> Pliable(x))\nforall x (Overbusy(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nBiogenic(laurene) and Clogged(laurene) -> Glycogenic(laurene)\nforall x (Pliable(x) -> Biogenic(x))\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Swollen(x))\n\nBiogenic(ferdy)\n\nforall x (Pliable(x) -> Biogenic(x)) <- forall x (Deliberate(x) and Swollen(x) -> Pliable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Nadia is kenyan. Adolphe is fancy. Ephrem is invitatory. Adella is bolshevist. Green, invitatory things are kenyan. Furry, bolshevist things are invitatory. Young things are kenyan. If Ephrem is vocalic and Ephrem is palmlike then Ephrem is kenyan. If something is invitatory then it is vocalic. If something is fancy then it is bolshevist. Nadia is not bolshevist.", "logic": "\nKenyan(nadia)\nFancy(adolphe)\nInvitatory(ephrem)\nBolshevist(adella)\nforall x (Palmlike(x) and Invitatory(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nforall x (Fancy(x) and Bolshevist(x) -> Invitatory(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) -> Kenyan(x))\nVocalic(ephrem) and Palmlike(ephrem) -> Kenyan(ephrem)\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Vocalic(x))\nforall x (Fancy(x) -> Bolshevist(x))\n\nnot Bolshevist(nadia)\n\nforall x (Fancy(x) -> Bolshevist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Adeline is offbeat. Odella is unblushing. Angus is biface. Zoe is feverish. Green, biface things are offbeat. Furry, feverish things are biface. Young things are offbeat. If Angus is metastable and Angus is posted then Angus is offbeat. If something is biface then it is metastable. If something is unblushing then it is feverish. Zoe is offbeat.", "logic": "\nOffbeat(adeline)\nUnblushing(odella)\nBiface(angus)\nFeverish(zoe)\nforall x (Posted(x) and Biface(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and Feverish(x) -> Biface(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nMetastable(angus) and Posted(angus) -> Offbeat(angus)\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Metastable(x))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) -> Feverish(x))\n\nOffbeat(zoe)\n\nforall x (Posted(x) and Biface(x) -> Offbeat(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Hiram is stagy. Viki is phrenetic. Manda is bistred. Darleen is ladened. Green, bistred things are stagy. Furry, ladened things are bistred. Young things are stagy. If Manda is ukrainian and Manda is sandlike then Manda is stagy. If something is bistred then it is ukrainian. If something is phrenetic then it is ladened. Darleen is not sandlike.", "logic": "\nStagy(hiram)\nPhrenetic(viki)\nBistred(manda)\nLadened(darleen)\nforall x (Sandlike(x) and Bistred(x) -> Stagy(x))\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) and Ladened(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Redemptory(x) -> Stagy(x))\nUkrainian(manda) and Sandlike(manda) -> Stagy(manda)\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) -> Ladened(x))\n\nnot Sandlike(darleen)\n\nnot Sandlike(darleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Judas is theban. Ely is backmost. Mair is languid. Charis is satiate. Green, languid things are theban. Furry, satiate things are languid. Young things are theban. If Mair is catarrhine and Mair is setose then Mair is theban. If something is languid then it is catarrhine. If something is backmost then it is satiate. Ely is sensitive.", "logic": "\nTheban(judas)\nBackmost(ely)\nLanguid(mair)\nSatiate(charis)\nforall x (Setose(x) and Languid(x) -> Theban(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) and Satiate(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Sensitive(x) -> Theban(x))\nCatarrhine(mair) and Setose(mair) -> Theban(mair)\nforall x (Languid(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Satiate(x))\n\nSensitive(ely)\n\nSensitive(ely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Rodolfo is stillborn. Lewis is hilly. Sherry is fuzzy. Binny is chilling. Green, fuzzy things are stillborn. Furry, chilling things are fuzzy. Young things are stillborn. If Sherry is passerine and Sherry is dislocated then Sherry is stillborn. If something is fuzzy then it is passerine. If something is hilly then it is chilling. Binny is not unapparent.", "logic": "\nStillborn(rodolfo)\nHilly(lewis)\nFuzzy(sherry)\nChilling(binny)\nforall x (Dislocated(x) and Fuzzy(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Hilly(x) and Chilling(x) -> Fuzzy(x))\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nPasserine(sherry) and Dislocated(sherry) -> Stillborn(sherry)\nforall x (Fuzzy(x) -> Passerine(x))\nforall x (Hilly(x) -> Chilling(x))\n\nnot Unapparent(binny)\n\nnot Unapparent(binny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Lorie is podlike. Tallie is exculpated. Nelson is consular. Buck is walking. Green, consular things are podlike. Furry, walking things are consular. Young things are podlike. If Nelson is winey and Nelson is upland then Nelson is podlike. If something is consular then it is winey. If something is exculpated then it is walking. Lorie is slatey.", "logic": "\nPodlike(lorie)\nExculpated(tallie)\nConsular(nelson)\nWalking(buck)\nforall x (Upland(x) and Consular(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) and Walking(x) -> Consular(x))\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Podlike(x))\nWiney(nelson) and Upland(nelson) -> Podlike(nelson)\nforall x (Consular(x) -> Winey(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) -> Walking(x))\n\nSlatey(lorie)\n\nSlatey(lorie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Allyson is falcate. Richmond is recessive. If something is styleless then it is tuppeny. If something is falcate and tuppeny then it is recessive. All strangled things are recessive. Nice things are flaxen. Green, recessive things are tuppeny. All recessive things are flaxen. All falcate things are tuppeny. If something is strangled and recessive then it is falcate. Allyson is falcate.", "logic": "\nFalcate(allyson)\nRecessive(richmond)\nforall x (Styleless(x) -> Tuppeny(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) and Tuppeny(x) -> Recessive(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> Recessive(x))\nforall x (Recessive(x) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) and Recessive(x) -> Tuppeny(x))\nforall x (Recessive(x) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Tuppeny(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) and Recessive(x) -> Falcate(x))\n\nFalcate(allyson)\n\ntherefore Falcate(allyson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Euclid is monotone. Krysta is unpleasing. If something is aphasic then it is chelated. If something is monotone and chelated then it is unpleasing. All inky things are unpleasing. Nice things are federate. Green, unpleasing things are chelated. All unpleasing things are federate. All monotone things are chelated. If something is inky and unpleasing then it is monotone. Krysta is not unpleasing.", "logic": "\nMonotone(euclid)\nUnpleasing(krysta)\nforall x (Aphasic(x) -> Chelated(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) and Chelated(x) -> Unpleasing(x))\nforall x (Inky(x) -> Unpleasing(x))\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Federate(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) and Unpleasing(x) -> Chelated(x))\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Federate(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) -> Chelated(x))\nforall x (Inky(x) and Unpleasing(x) -> Monotone(x))\n\nnot Unpleasing(krysta)\n\ntherefore Unpleasing(krysta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Patrica is hardy. Julianna is deciduous. If something is thickset then it is attended. If something is hardy and attended then it is deciduous. All trabeated things are deciduous. Nice things are agonizing. Green, deciduous things are attended. All deciduous things are agonizing. All hardy things are attended. If something is trabeated and deciduous then it is hardy. Patrica is attended.", "logic": "\nHardy(patrica)\nDeciduous(julianna)\nforall x (Thickset(x) -> Attended(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) and Attended(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nforall x (Trabeated(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nforall x (Deciduous(x) -> Agonizing(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) and Deciduous(x) -> Attended(x))\nforall x (Deciduous(x) -> Agonizing(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) -> Attended(x))\nforall x (Trabeated(x) and Deciduous(x) -> Hardy(x))\n\nAttended(patrica)\n\nHardy(patrica) and forall x (Hardy(x) -> Attended(x)) -> therefore Attended(patrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Thaddeus is physical. Lauren is tritanopic. If something is moneyed then it is singable. If something is physical and singable then it is tritanopic. All transfixed things are tritanopic. Nice things are carboxyl. Green, tritanopic things are singable. All tritanopic things are carboxyl. All physical things are singable. If something is transfixed and tritanopic then it is physical. Lauren is not carboxyl.", "logic": "\nPhysical(thaddeus)\nTritanopic(lauren)\nforall x (Moneyed(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Physical(x) and Singable(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Physical(x) and Tritanopic(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) and Tritanopic(x) -> Physical(x))\n\nnot Carboxyl(lauren)\n\nTritanopic(lauren) and forall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Carboxyl(x)) -> therefore Carboxyl(lauren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Jonny is flameproof. Saw is extinct. If something is noiseless then it is aneuploid. If something is flameproof and aneuploid then it is extinct. All fivefold things are extinct. Nice things are fugacious. Green, extinct things are aneuploid. All extinct things are fugacious. All flameproof things are aneuploid. If something is fivefold and extinct then it is flameproof. Jonny is extinct.", "logic": "\nFlameproof(jonny)\nExtinct(saw)\nforall x (Noiseless(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Aneuploid(x) -> Extinct(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Extinct(x))\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Fugacious(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Extinct(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Fugacious(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) and Extinct(x) -> Flameproof(x))\n\nExtinct(jonny)\n\nFlameproof(jonny) and forall x (Flameproof(x) -> Aneuploid(x)) -> therefore Aneuploid(jonny) Flameproof(jonny) and Aneuploid(jonny) and forall x (Flameproof(x) and Aneuploid(x) -> Extinct(x)) -> therefore Extinct(jonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Filbert is excursive. Raynell is variant. If something is uncertain then it is spermous. If something is excursive and spermous then it is variant. All helpful things are variant. Nice things are gruff. Green, variant things are spermous. All variant things are gruff. All excursive things are spermous. If something is helpful and variant then it is excursive. Filbert is not variant.", "logic": "\nExcursive(filbert)\nVariant(raynell)\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Spermous(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Spermous(x) -> Variant(x))\nforall x (Helpful(x) -> Variant(x))\nforall x (Variant(x) -> Gruff(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Variant(x) -> Spermous(x))\nforall x (Variant(x) -> Gruff(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) -> Spermous(x))\nforall x (Helpful(x) and Variant(x) -> Excursive(x))\n\nnot Variant(filbert)\n\nExcursive(filbert) and forall x (Excursive(x) -> Spermous(x)) -> therefore Spermous(filbert) Excursive(filbert) and Spermous(filbert) and forall x (Excursive(x) and Spermous(x) -> Variant(x)) -> therefore Variant(filbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Faun is autotomic. Maryl is presbyopic. If something is factual then it is amnionic. If something is autotomic and amnionic then it is presbyopic. All grenadian things are presbyopic. Nice things are rising. Green, presbyopic things are amnionic. All presbyopic things are rising. All autotomic things are amnionic. If something is grenadian and presbyopic then it is autotomic. Faun is rising.", "logic": "\nAutotomic(faun)\nPresbyopic(maryl)\nforall x (Factual(x) -> Amnionic(x))\nforall x (Autotomic(x) and Amnionic(x) -> Presbyopic(x))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) -> Presbyopic(x))\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Autotomic(x) and Presbyopic(x) -> Amnionic(x))\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Autotomic(x) -> Amnionic(x))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Presbyopic(x) -> Autotomic(x))\n\nRising(faun)\n\nAutotomic(faun) and forall x (Autotomic(x) -> Amnionic(x)) -> therefore Amnionic(faun) Autotomic(faun) and Amnionic(faun) and forall x (Autotomic(x) and Amnionic(x) -> Presbyopic(x)) -> therefore Presbyopic(faun) Presbyopic(faun) and forall x (Presbyopic(x) -> Rising(x)) -> therefore Rising(faun)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Bearnard is barmy. Rubin is nonviscid. If something is pudendal then it is cuspidated. If something is barmy and cuspidated then it is nonviscid. All helical things are nonviscid. Nice things are gibbose. Green, nonviscid things are cuspidated. All nonviscid things are gibbose. All barmy things are cuspidated. If something is helical and nonviscid then it is barmy. Bearnard is not gibbose.", "logic": "\nBarmy(bearnard)\nNonviscid(rubin)\nforall x (Pudendal(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) and Cuspidated(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) -> Gibbose(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) -> Gibbose(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\nforall x (Helical(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Barmy(x))\n\nnot Gibbose(bearnard)\n\nBarmy(bearnard) and forall x (Barmy(x) -> Cuspidated(x)) -> therefore Cuspidated(bearnard) Barmy(bearnard) and Cuspidated(bearnard) and forall x (Barmy(x) and Cuspidated(x) -> Nonviscid(x)) -> therefore Nonviscid(bearnard) Nonviscid(bearnard) and forall x (Nonviscid(x) -> Gibbose(x)) -> therefore Gibbose(bearnard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Nissa is rebellious. Osbert is agrestic. If something is bristly then it is wriggly. If something is rebellious and wriggly then it is agrestic. All fabricated things are agrestic. Nice things are slavonic. Green, agrestic things are wriggly. All agrestic things are slavonic. All rebellious things are wriggly. If something is fabricated and agrestic then it is rebellious. Osbert is not rebellious.", "logic": "\nRebellious(nissa)\nAgrestic(osbert)\nforall x (Bristly(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Rebellious(x) and Wriggly(x) -> Agrestic(x))\nforall x (Fabricated(x) -> Agrestic(x))\nforall x (Agrestic(x) -> Slavonic(x))\nforall x (Rebellious(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Agrestic(x) -> Slavonic(x))\nforall x (Rebellious(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Fabricated(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Rebellious(x))\n\nnot Rebellious(osbert)\n\nforall x (Fabricated(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Rebellious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Darleen is tined. Judie is crisscross. If something is tendinous then it is overloaded. If something is tined and overloaded then it is crisscross. All plaguey things are crisscross. Nice things are omissive. Green, crisscross things are overloaded. All crisscross things are omissive. All tined things are overloaded. If something is plaguey and crisscross then it is tined. Judie is overloaded.", "logic": "\nTined(darleen)\nCrisscross(judie)\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> Overloaded(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) and Overloaded(x) -> Crisscross(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) -> Crisscross(x))\nforall x (Crisscross(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) and Crisscross(x) -> Overloaded(x))\nforall x (Crisscross(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Overloaded(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) and Crisscross(x) -> Tined(x))\n\nOverloaded(judie)\n\nforall x (Tined(x) and Crisscross(x) -> Overloaded(x)) <- forall x (Plaguey(x) and Crisscross(x) -> Tined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Berke is concentric. Shauna is ravaging. If something is homicidal then it is scanty. If something is concentric and scanty then it is ravaging. All wearing things are ravaging. Nice things are eighteen. Green, ravaging things are scanty. All ravaging things are eighteen. All concentric things are scanty. If something is wearing and ravaging then it is concentric. Shauna is not smart.", "logic": "\nConcentric(berke)\nRavaging(shauna)\nforall x (Homicidal(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) and Scanty(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) and Ravaging(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) and Ravaging(x) -> Concentric(x))\n\nnot Smart(shauna)\n\nnot Smart(shauna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Alvina is upper. Devon is allegro. If something is acaudal then it is panoramic. If something is upper and panoramic then it is allegro. All icky things are allegro. Nice things are through. Green, allegro things are panoramic. All allegro things are through. All upper things are panoramic. If something is icky and allegro then it is upper. Devon is icky.", "logic": "\nUpper(alvina)\nAllegro(devon)\nforall x (Acaudal(x) -> Panoramic(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) and Panoramic(x) -> Allegro(x))\nforall x (Icky(x) -> Allegro(x))\nforall x (Allegro(x) -> Through(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) and Allegro(x) -> Panoramic(x))\nforall x (Allegro(x) -> Through(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Panoramic(x))\nforall x (Icky(x) and Allegro(x) -> Upper(x))\n\nIcky(devon)\n\nIcky(devon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Cyrille is venial. Chester is biannual. If something is bumbling then it is murmuring. If something is venial and murmuring then it is biannual. All tongued things are biannual. Nice things are smuggled. Green, biannual things are murmuring. All biannual things are smuggled. All venial things are murmuring. If something is tongued and biannual then it is venial. Cyrille is not tongued.", "logic": "\nVenial(cyrille)\nBiannual(chester)\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Murmuring(x))\nforall x (Venial(x) and Murmuring(x) -> Biannual(x))\nforall x (Tongued(x) -> Biannual(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) -> Smuggled(x))\nforall x (Venial(x) and Biannual(x) -> Murmuring(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) -> Smuggled(x))\nforall x (Venial(x) -> Murmuring(x))\nforall x (Tongued(x) and Biannual(x) -> Venial(x))\n\nnot Tongued(cyrille)\n\nnot Tongued(cyrille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Georgia is societal. Rafaelita is debatable. If something is desirable then it is chargeable. If something is societal and chargeable then it is debatable. All stative things are debatable. Nice things are solid. Green, debatable things are chargeable. All debatable things are solid. All societal things are chargeable. If something is stative and debatable then it is societal. Rafaelita is desirable.", "logic": "\nSocietal(georgia)\nDebatable(rafaelita)\nforall x (Desirable(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) and Chargeable(x) -> Debatable(x))\nforall x (Stative(x) -> Debatable(x))\nforall x (Debatable(x) -> Solid(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) and Debatable(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Debatable(x) -> Solid(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Stative(x) and Debatable(x) -> Societal(x))\n\nDesirable(rafaelita)\n\nDesirable(rafaelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Idaline is tabu. Geeta is dwindling. If something is uppermost then it is magnetized. If something is tabu and magnetized then it is dwindling. All scrabbly things are dwindling. Nice things are troublous. Green, dwindling things are magnetized. All dwindling things are troublous. All tabu things are magnetized. If something is scrabbly and dwindling then it is tabu. Idaline is not uppermost.", "logic": "\nTabu(idaline)\nDwindling(geeta)\nforall x (Uppermost(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nforall x (Tabu(x) and Magnetized(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Tabu(x) and Dwindling(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Tabu(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nforall x (Scrabbly(x) and Dwindling(x) -> Tabu(x))\n\nnot Uppermost(idaline)\n\nnot Uppermost(idaline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Caritta is salaried. Otes is carpetbag. If something is overlarge then it is scarred. If something is salaried and scarred then it is carpetbag. All fraught things are carpetbag. Nice things are surprising. Green, carpetbag things are scarred. All carpetbag things are surprising. All salaried things are scarred. If something is fraught and carpetbag then it is salaried. Caritta is smart.", "logic": "\nSalaried(caritta)\nCarpetbag(otes)\nforall x (Overlarge(x) -> Scarred(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) and Scarred(x) -> Carpetbag(x))\nforall x (Fraught(x) -> Carpetbag(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) and Carpetbag(x) -> Scarred(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Scarred(x))\nforall x (Fraught(x) and Carpetbag(x) -> Salaried(x))\n\nSmart(caritta)\n\nSmart(caritta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "The homer idle the josi. The homer idle the elysia. The homer is floored. The josi is floored. The josi oxidize the auroora. The auroora does not eat the josi. The auroora oxidize the homer. The auroora oxidize the josi. The auroora does not need the elysia. The elysia is floored. If someone idle the homer and the homer idle the auroora then the auroora oxidize the elysia. If someone oxidize the auroora then they are automated. If someone percolate the josi and the josi oxidize the auroora then the josi is floored. If someone idle the elysia and they do not need the elysia then they chase the josi. All floored, automated people are receding. If someone is receding then they eat the elysia. If someone is isolable and they eat the auroora then they chase the elysia. If someone is receding and they chase the homer then they chase the elysia. The josi oxidize the auroora.", "logic": "\nIdle(homer, josi)\nIdle(homer, elysia)\nFloored(homer)\nFloored(josi)\nOxidize(josi, auroora)\nnot Idle(auroora, josi)\nOxidize(auroora, homer)\nOxidize(auroora, josi)\nnot Oxidize(auroora, elysia)\nFloored(elysia)\nforall x (Idle(x, homer) and Idle(homer, auroora) -> Oxidize(auroora, elysia))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, auroora) -> Automated(x))\nforall x (Percolate(x, josi) and Oxidize(josi, auroora) -> Floored(josi))\nforall x (Idle(x, elysia) and not Oxidize(x, elysia) -> Percolate(x, josi))\nforall x (Floored(x) and Automated(x) -> Receding(x))\nforall x (Receding(x) -> Idle(x, elysia))\nforall x (Isolable(x) and Idle(x, auroora) -> Percolate(x, elysia))\nforall x (Receding(x) and Percolate(x, homer) -> Percolate(x, elysia))\n\nOxidize(josi, auroora)\n\ntherefore Oxidize(josi, auroora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The rikki alternate the elmore. The rikki alternate the norry. The rikki is toadyish. The elmore is toadyish. The elmore dilapidate the reggi. The reggi does not eat the elmore. The reggi dilapidate the rikki. The reggi dilapidate the elmore. The reggi does not need the norry. The norry is toadyish. If someone alternate the rikki and the rikki alternate the reggi then the reggi dilapidate the norry. If someone dilapidate the reggi then they are zippy. If someone roughhouse the elmore and the elmore dilapidate the reggi then the elmore is toadyish. If someone alternate the norry and they do not need the norry then they chase the elmore. All toadyish, zippy people are neritic. If someone is neritic then they eat the norry. If someone is inferior and they eat the reggi then they chase the norry. If someone is neritic and they chase the rikki then they chase the norry. The elmore is not toadyish.", "logic": "\nAlternate(rikki, elmore)\nAlternate(rikki, norry)\nToadyish(rikki)\nToadyish(elmore)\nDilapidate(elmore, reggi)\nnot Alternate(reggi, elmore)\nDilapidate(reggi, rikki)\nDilapidate(reggi, elmore)\nnot Dilapidate(reggi, norry)\nToadyish(norry)\nforall x (Alternate(x, rikki) and Alternate(rikki, reggi) -> Dilapidate(reggi, norry))\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, reggi) -> Zippy(x))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, elmore) and Dilapidate(elmore, reggi) -> Toadyish(elmore))\nforall x (Alternate(x, norry) and not Dilapidate(x, norry) -> Roughhouse(x, elmore))\nforall x (Toadyish(x) and Zippy(x) -> Neritic(x))\nforall x (Neritic(x) -> Alternate(x, norry))\nforall x (Inferior(x) and Alternate(x, reggi) -> Roughhouse(x, norry))\nforall x (Neritic(x) and Roughhouse(x, rikki) -> Roughhouse(x, norry))\n\nnot Toadyish(elmore)\n\ntherefore Toadyish(elmore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The tessa organise the nataline. The tessa organise the marcelle. The tessa is futurist. The nataline is futurist. The nataline outmatch the spud. The spud does not eat the nataline. The spud outmatch the tessa. The spud outmatch the nataline. The spud does not need the marcelle. The marcelle is futurist. If someone organise the tessa and the tessa organise the spud then the spud outmatch the marcelle. If someone outmatch the spud then they are ghastly. If someone pare the nataline and the nataline outmatch the spud then the nataline is futurist. If someone organise the marcelle and they do not need the marcelle then they chase the nataline. All futurist, ghastly people are disciform. If someone is disciform then they eat the marcelle. If someone is bumptious and they eat the spud then they chase the marcelle. If someone is disciform and they chase the tessa then they chase the marcelle. The nataline is ghastly.", "logic": "\nOrganise(tessa, nataline)\nOrganise(tessa, marcelle)\nFuturist(tessa)\nFuturist(nataline)\nOutmatch(nataline, spud)\nnot Organise(spud, nataline)\nOutmatch(spud, tessa)\nOutmatch(spud, nataline)\nnot Outmatch(spud, marcelle)\nFuturist(marcelle)\nforall x (Organise(x, tessa) and Organise(tessa, spud) -> Outmatch(spud, marcelle))\nforall x (Outmatch(x, spud) -> Ghastly(x))\nforall x (Pare(x, nataline) and Outmatch(nataline, spud) -> Futurist(nataline))\nforall x (Organise(x, marcelle) and not Outmatch(x, marcelle) -> Pare(x, nataline))\nforall x (Futurist(x) and Ghastly(x) -> Disciform(x))\nforall x (Disciform(x) -> Organise(x, marcelle))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and Organise(x, spud) -> Pare(x, marcelle))\nforall x (Disciform(x) and Pare(x, tessa) -> Pare(x, marcelle))\n\nGhastly(nataline)\n\nOutmatch(nataline, spud) and forall x (Outmatch(x, spud) -> Ghastly(x)) -> therefore Ghastly(nataline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The neilla allegorize the lysandra. The neilla allegorize the theodora. The neilla is affinal. The lysandra is affinal. The lysandra scat the pierrette. The pierrette does not eat the lysandra. The pierrette scat the neilla. The pierrette scat the lysandra. The pierrette does not need the theodora. The theodora is affinal. If someone allegorize the neilla and the neilla allegorize the pierrette then the pierrette scat the theodora. If someone scat the pierrette then they are terrible. If someone palsy the lysandra and the lysandra scat the pierrette then the lysandra is affinal. If someone allegorize the theodora and they do not need the theodora then they chase the lysandra. All affinal, terrible people are actionable. If someone is actionable then they eat the theodora. If someone is acentric and they eat the pierrette then they chase the theodora. If someone is actionable and they chase the neilla then they chase the theodora. The lysandra is not terrible.", "logic": "\nAllegorize(neilla, lysandra)\nAllegorize(neilla, theodora)\nAffinal(neilla)\nAffinal(lysandra)\nScat(lysandra, pierrette)\nnot Allegorize(pierrette, lysandra)\nScat(pierrette, neilla)\nScat(pierrette, lysandra)\nnot Scat(pierrette, theodora)\nAffinal(theodora)\nforall x (Allegorize(x, neilla) and Allegorize(neilla, pierrette) -> Scat(pierrette, theodora))\nforall x (Scat(x, pierrette) -> Terrible(x))\nforall x (Palsy(x, lysandra) and Scat(lysandra, pierrette) -> Affinal(lysandra))\nforall x (Allegorize(x, theodora) and not Scat(x, theodora) -> Palsy(x, lysandra))\nforall x (Affinal(x) and Terrible(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Allegorize(x, theodora))\nforall x (Acentric(x) and Allegorize(x, pierrette) -> Palsy(x, theodora))\nforall x (Actionable(x) and Palsy(x, neilla) -> Palsy(x, theodora))\n\nnot Terrible(lysandra)\n\nScat(lysandra, pierrette) and forall x (Scat(x, pierrette) -> Terrible(x)) -> therefore Terrible(lysandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The godfrey convect the robinia. The godfrey convect the ingeberg. The godfrey is nicaean. The robinia is nicaean. The robinia chalk the marlee. The marlee does not eat the robinia. The marlee chalk the godfrey. The marlee chalk the robinia. The marlee does not need the ingeberg. The ingeberg is nicaean. If someone convect the godfrey and the godfrey convect the marlee then the marlee chalk the ingeberg. If someone chalk the marlee then they are bizarre. If someone serrate the robinia and the robinia chalk the marlee then the robinia is nicaean. If someone convect the ingeberg and they do not need the ingeberg then they chase the robinia. All nicaean, bizarre people are sickish. If someone is sickish then they eat the ingeberg. If someone is unpillared and they eat the marlee then they chase the ingeberg. If someone is sickish and they chase the godfrey then they chase the ingeberg. The robinia is sickish.", "logic": "\nConvect(godfrey, robinia)\nConvect(godfrey, ingeberg)\nNicaean(godfrey)\nNicaean(robinia)\nChalk(robinia, marlee)\nnot Convect(marlee, robinia)\nChalk(marlee, godfrey)\nChalk(marlee, robinia)\nnot Chalk(marlee, ingeberg)\nNicaean(ingeberg)\nforall x (Convect(x, godfrey) and Convect(godfrey, marlee) -> Chalk(marlee, ingeberg))\nforall x (Chalk(x, marlee) -> Bizarre(x))\nforall x (Serrate(x, robinia) and Chalk(robinia, marlee) -> Nicaean(robinia))\nforall x (Convect(x, ingeberg) and not Chalk(x, ingeberg) -> Serrate(x, robinia))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Convect(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Unpillared(x) and Convect(x, marlee) -> Serrate(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Sickish(x) and Serrate(x, godfrey) -> Serrate(x, ingeberg))\n\nSickish(robinia)\n\nChalk(robinia, marlee) and forall x (Chalk(x, marlee) -> Bizarre(x)) -> therefore Bizarre(robinia) Nicaean(robinia) and Bizarre(robinia) and forall x (Nicaean(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Sickish(x)) -> therefore Sickish(robinia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The estella underline the melantha. The estella underline the lazare. The estella is pitchy. The melantha is pitchy. The melantha degas the davina. The davina does not eat the melantha. The davina degas the estella. The davina degas the melantha. The davina does not need the lazare. The lazare is pitchy. If someone underline the estella and the estella underline the davina then the davina degas the lazare. If someone degas the davina then they are sorry. If someone dose the melantha and the melantha degas the davina then the melantha is pitchy. If someone underline the lazare and they do not need the lazare then they chase the melantha. All pitchy, sorry people are xviii. If someone is xviii then they eat the lazare. If someone is dizygous and they eat the davina then they chase the lazare. If someone is xviii and they chase the estella then they chase the lazare. The melantha is not xviii.", "logic": "\nUnderline(estella, melantha)\nUnderline(estella, lazare)\nPitchy(estella)\nPitchy(melantha)\nDegas(melantha, davina)\nnot Underline(davina, melantha)\nDegas(davina, estella)\nDegas(davina, melantha)\nnot Degas(davina, lazare)\nPitchy(lazare)\nforall x (Underline(x, estella) and Underline(estella, davina) -> Degas(davina, lazare))\nforall x (Degas(x, davina) -> Sorry(x))\nforall x (Dose(x, melantha) and Degas(melantha, davina) -> Pitchy(melantha))\nforall x (Underline(x, lazare) and not Degas(x, lazare) -> Dose(x, melantha))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) and Sorry(x) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Xviii(x) -> Underline(x, lazare))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) and Underline(x, davina) -> Dose(x, lazare))\nforall x (Xviii(x) and Dose(x, estella) -> Dose(x, lazare))\n\nnot Xviii(melantha)\n\nDegas(melantha, davina) and forall x (Degas(x, davina) -> Sorry(x)) -> therefore Sorry(melantha) Pitchy(melantha) and Sorry(melantha) and forall x (Pitchy(x) and Sorry(x) -> Xviii(x)) -> therefore Xviii(melantha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The hagan holystone the twila. The hagan holystone the irene. The hagan is contrasty. The twila is contrasty. The twila draught the lotti. The lotti does not eat the twila. The lotti draught the hagan. The lotti draught the twila. The lotti does not need the irene. The irene is contrasty. If someone holystone the hagan and the hagan holystone the lotti then the lotti draught the irene. If someone draught the lotti then they are nether. If someone sport the twila and the twila draught the lotti then the twila is contrasty. If someone holystone the irene and they do not need the irene then they chase the twila. All contrasty, nether people are unpainful. If someone is unpainful then they eat the irene. If someone is antimonial and they eat the lotti then they chase the irene. If someone is unpainful and they chase the hagan then they chase the irene. The twila holystone the irene.", "logic": "\nHolystone(hagan, twila)\nHolystone(hagan, irene)\nContrasty(hagan)\nContrasty(twila)\nDraught(twila, lotti)\nnot Holystone(lotti, twila)\nDraught(lotti, hagan)\nDraught(lotti, twila)\nnot Draught(lotti, irene)\nContrasty(irene)\nforall x (Holystone(x, hagan) and Holystone(hagan, lotti) -> Draught(lotti, irene))\nforall x (Draught(x, lotti) -> Nether(x))\nforall x (Sport(x, twila) and Draught(twila, lotti) -> Contrasty(twila))\nforall x (Holystone(x, irene) and not Draught(x, irene) -> Sport(x, twila))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) and Nether(x) -> Unpainful(x))\nforall x (Unpainful(x) -> Holystone(x, irene))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) and Holystone(x, lotti) -> Sport(x, irene))\nforall x (Unpainful(x) and Sport(x, hagan) -> Sport(x, irene))\n\nHolystone(twila, irene)\n\nDraught(twila, lotti) and forall x (Draught(x, lotti) -> Nether(x)) -> therefore Nether(twila) Contrasty(twila) and Nether(twila) and forall x (Contrasty(x) and Nether(x) -> Unpainful(x)) -> therefore Unpainful(twila) Unpainful(twila) and forall x (Unpainful(x) -> Holystone(x, irene)) -> therefore Holystone(twila, irene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The farah tailor the stephani. The farah tailor the vitia. The farah is fledged. The stephani is fledged. The stephani readapt the clotilda. The clotilda does not eat the stephani. The clotilda readapt the farah. The clotilda readapt the stephani. The clotilda does not need the vitia. The vitia is fledged. If someone tailor the farah and the farah tailor the clotilda then the clotilda readapt the vitia. If someone readapt the clotilda then they are legion. If someone marvel the stephani and the stephani readapt the clotilda then the stephani is fledged. If someone tailor the vitia and they do not need the vitia then they chase the stephani. All fledged, legion people are fixed. If someone is fixed then they eat the vitia. If someone is exultant and they eat the clotilda then they chase the vitia. If someone is fixed and they chase the farah then they chase the vitia. The stephani does not eat the vitia.", "logic": "\nTailor(farah, stephani)\nTailor(farah, vitia)\nFledged(farah)\nFledged(stephani)\nReadapt(stephani, clotilda)\nnot Tailor(clotilda, stephani)\nReadapt(clotilda, farah)\nReadapt(clotilda, stephani)\nnot Readapt(clotilda, vitia)\nFledged(vitia)\nforall x (Tailor(x, farah) and Tailor(farah, clotilda) -> Readapt(clotilda, vitia))\nforall x (Readapt(x, clotilda) -> Legion(x))\nforall x (Marvel(x, stephani) and Readapt(stephani, clotilda) -> Fledged(stephani))\nforall x (Tailor(x, vitia) and not Readapt(x, vitia) -> Marvel(x, stephani))\nforall x (Fledged(x) and Legion(x) -> Fixed(x))\nforall x (Fixed(x) -> Tailor(x, vitia))\nforall x (Exultant(x) and Tailor(x, clotilda) -> Marvel(x, vitia))\nforall x (Fixed(x) and Marvel(x, farah) -> Marvel(x, vitia))\n\nnot Tailor(stephani, vitia)\n\nReadapt(stephani, clotilda) and forall x (Readapt(x, clotilda) -> Legion(x)) -> therefore Legion(stephani) Fledged(stephani) and Legion(stephani) and forall x (Fledged(x) and Legion(x) -> Fixed(x)) -> therefore Fixed(stephani) Fixed(stephani) and forall x (Fixed(x) -> Tailor(x, vitia)) -> therefore Tailor(stephani, vitia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The elvera inform the erinna. The elvera inform the alena. The elvera is empathic. The erinna is empathic. The erinna candy the sterling. The sterling does not eat the erinna. The sterling candy the elvera. The sterling candy the erinna. The sterling does not need the alena. The alena is empathic. If someone inform the elvera and the elvera inform the sterling then the sterling candy the alena. If someone candy the sterling then they are basined. If someone redeposit the erinna and the erinna candy the sterling then the erinna is empathic. If someone inform the alena and they do not need the alena then they chase the erinna. All empathic, basined people are uncivil. If someone is uncivil then they eat the alena. If someone is stooping and they eat the sterling then they chase the alena. If someone is uncivil and they chase the elvera then they chase the alena. The sterling does not chase the erinna.", "logic": "\nInform(elvera, erinna)\nInform(elvera, alena)\nEmpathic(elvera)\nEmpathic(erinna)\nCandy(erinna, sterling)\nnot Inform(sterling, erinna)\nCandy(sterling, elvera)\nCandy(sterling, erinna)\nnot Candy(sterling, alena)\nEmpathic(alena)\nforall x (Inform(x, elvera) and Inform(elvera, sterling) -> Candy(sterling, alena))\nforall x (Candy(x, sterling) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Redeposit(x, erinna) and Candy(erinna, sterling) -> Empathic(erinna))\nforall x (Inform(x, alena) and not Candy(x, alena) -> Redeposit(x, erinna))\nforall x (Empathic(x) and Basined(x) -> Uncivil(x))\nforall x (Uncivil(x) -> Inform(x, alena))\nforall x (Stooping(x) and Inform(x, sterling) -> Redeposit(x, alena))\nforall x (Uncivil(x) and Redeposit(x, elvera) -> Redeposit(x, alena))\n\nnot Redeposit(sterling, erinna)\n\nforall x (Inform(x, alena) and not Candy(x, alena) -> Redeposit(x, erinna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The lolita mess the sybyl. The lolita mess the amelina. The lolita is monumental. The sybyl is monumental. The sybyl warn the trixie. The trixie does not eat the sybyl. The trixie warn the lolita. The trixie warn the sybyl. The trixie does not need the amelina. The amelina is monumental. If someone mess the lolita and the lolita mess the trixie then the trixie warn the amelina. If someone warn the trixie then they are doglike. If someone decant the sybyl and the sybyl warn the trixie then the sybyl is monumental. If someone mess the amelina and they do not need the amelina then they chase the sybyl. All monumental, doglike people are cupular. If someone is cupular then they eat the amelina. If someone is flyaway and they eat the trixie then they chase the amelina. If someone is cupular and they chase the lolita then they chase the amelina. The lolita decant the amelina.", "logic": "\nMess(lolita, sybyl)\nMess(lolita, amelina)\nMonumental(lolita)\nMonumental(sybyl)\nWarn(sybyl, trixie)\nnot Mess(trixie, sybyl)\nWarn(trixie, lolita)\nWarn(trixie, sybyl)\nnot Warn(trixie, amelina)\nMonumental(amelina)\nforall x (Mess(x, lolita) and Mess(lolita, trixie) -> Warn(trixie, amelina))\nforall x (Warn(x, trixie) -> Doglike(x))\nforall x (Decant(x, sybyl) and Warn(sybyl, trixie) -> Monumental(sybyl))\nforall x (Mess(x, amelina) and not Warn(x, amelina) -> Decant(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Monumental(x) and Doglike(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> Mess(x, amelina))\nforall x (Flyaway(x) and Mess(x, trixie) -> Decant(x, amelina))\nforall x (Cupular(x) and Decant(x, lolita) -> Decant(x, amelina))\n\nDecant(lolita, amelina)\n\nforall x (Flyaway(x) and Mess(x, trixie) -> Decant(x, amelina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The shaun detect the matelda. The shaun detect the meggan. The shaun is limiting. The matelda is limiting. The matelda retrench the olivette. The olivette does not eat the matelda. The olivette retrench the shaun. The olivette retrench the matelda. The olivette does not need the meggan. The meggan is limiting. If someone detect the shaun and the shaun detect the olivette then the olivette retrench the meggan. If someone retrench the olivette then they are relaxed. If someone granulate the matelda and the matelda retrench the olivette then the matelda is limiting. If someone detect the meggan and they do not need the meggan then they chase the matelda. All limiting, relaxed people are analyzed. If someone is analyzed then they eat the meggan. If someone is unvoiced and they eat the olivette then they chase the meggan. If someone is analyzed and they chase the shaun then they chase the meggan. The olivette does not chase the meggan.", "logic": "\nDetect(shaun, matelda)\nDetect(shaun, meggan)\nLimiting(shaun)\nLimiting(matelda)\nRetrench(matelda, olivette)\nnot Detect(olivette, matelda)\nRetrench(olivette, shaun)\nRetrench(olivette, matelda)\nnot Retrench(olivette, meggan)\nLimiting(meggan)\nforall x (Detect(x, shaun) and Detect(shaun, olivette) -> Retrench(olivette, meggan))\nforall x (Retrench(x, olivette) -> Relaxed(x))\nforall x (Granulate(x, matelda) and Retrench(matelda, olivette) -> Limiting(matelda))\nforall x (Detect(x, meggan) and not Retrench(x, meggan) -> Granulate(x, matelda))\nforall x (Limiting(x) and Relaxed(x) -> Analyzed(x))\nforall x (Analyzed(x) -> Detect(x, meggan))\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) and Detect(x, olivette) -> Granulate(x, meggan))\nforall x (Analyzed(x) and Granulate(x, shaun) -> Granulate(x, meggan))\n\nnot Granulate(olivette, meggan)\n\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) and Detect(x, olivette) -> Granulate(x, meggan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The sinclare cumber the margalo. The sinclare cumber the rod. The sinclare is registered. The margalo is registered. The margalo neaten the phyllis. The phyllis does not eat the margalo. The phyllis neaten the sinclare. The phyllis neaten the margalo. The phyllis does not need the rod. The rod is registered. If someone cumber the sinclare and the sinclare cumber the phyllis then the phyllis neaten the rod. If someone neaten the phyllis then they are adulterant. If someone roost the margalo and the margalo neaten the phyllis then the margalo is registered. If someone cumber the rod and they do not need the rod then they chase the margalo. All registered, adulterant people are xlvi. If someone is xlvi then they eat the rod. If someone is multiplex and they eat the phyllis then they chase the rod. If someone is xlvi and they chase the sinclare then they chase the rod. The rod roost the rod.", "logic": "\nCumber(sinclare, margalo)\nCumber(sinclare, rod)\nRegistered(sinclare)\nRegistered(margalo)\nNeaten(margalo, phyllis)\nnot Cumber(phyllis, margalo)\nNeaten(phyllis, sinclare)\nNeaten(phyllis, margalo)\nnot Neaten(phyllis, rod)\nRegistered(rod)\nforall x (Cumber(x, sinclare) and Cumber(sinclare, phyllis) -> Neaten(phyllis, rod))\nforall x (Neaten(x, phyllis) -> Adulterant(x))\nforall x (Roost(x, margalo) and Neaten(margalo, phyllis) -> Registered(margalo))\nforall x (Cumber(x, rod) and not Neaten(x, rod) -> Roost(x, margalo))\nforall x (Registered(x) and Adulterant(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Xlvi(x) -> Cumber(x, rod))\nforall x (Multiplex(x) and Cumber(x, phyllis) -> Roost(x, rod))\nforall x (Xlvi(x) and Roost(x, sinclare) -> Roost(x, rod))\n\nRoost(rod, rod)\n\nforall x (Multiplex(x) and Cumber(x, phyllis) -> Roost(x, rod)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The nydia steel the skelly. The nydia steel the tulley. The nydia is taunting. The skelly is taunting. The skelly depose the skipton. The skipton does not eat the skelly. The skipton depose the nydia. The skipton depose the skelly. The skipton does not need the tulley. The tulley is taunting. If someone steel the nydia and the nydia steel the skipton then the skipton depose the tulley. If someone depose the skipton then they are barbed. If someone librate the skelly and the skelly depose the skipton then the skelly is taunting. If someone steel the tulley and they do not need the tulley then they chase the skelly. All taunting, barbed people are underarm. If someone is underarm then they eat the tulley. If someone is dummy and they eat the skipton then they chase the tulley. If someone is underarm and they chase the nydia then they chase the tulley. The skipton does not need the skipton.", "logic": "\nSteel(nydia, skelly)\nSteel(nydia, tulley)\nTaunting(nydia)\nTaunting(skelly)\nDepose(skelly, skipton)\nnot Steel(skipton, skelly)\nDepose(skipton, nydia)\nDepose(skipton, skelly)\nnot Depose(skipton, tulley)\nTaunting(tulley)\nforall x (Steel(x, nydia) and Steel(nydia, skipton) -> Depose(skipton, tulley))\nforall x (Depose(x, skipton) -> Barbed(x))\nforall x (Librate(x, skelly) and Depose(skelly, skipton) -> Taunting(skelly))\nforall x (Steel(x, tulley) and not Depose(x, tulley) -> Librate(x, skelly))\nforall x (Taunting(x) and Barbed(x) -> Underarm(x))\nforall x (Underarm(x) -> Steel(x, tulley))\nforall x (Dummy(x) and Steel(x, skipton) -> Librate(x, tulley))\nforall x (Underarm(x) and Librate(x, nydia) -> Librate(x, tulley))\n\nnot Depose(skipton, skipton)\n\nnot Depose(skipton, skipton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The beale average the arliene. The beale average the dov. The beale is troubling. The arliene is troubling. The arliene straggle the merrel. The merrel does not eat the arliene. The merrel straggle the beale. The merrel straggle the arliene. The merrel does not need the dov. The dov is troubling. If someone average the beale and the beale average the merrel then the merrel straggle the dov. If someone straggle the merrel then they are collinear. If someone clerk the arliene and the arliene straggle the merrel then the arliene is troubling. If someone average the dov and they do not need the dov then they chase the arliene. All troubling, collinear people are boffo. If someone is boffo then they eat the dov. If someone is unpainful and they eat the merrel then they chase the dov. If someone is boffo and they chase the beale then they chase the dov. The arliene is unpainful.", "logic": "\nAverage(beale, arliene)\nAverage(beale, dov)\nTroubling(beale)\nTroubling(arliene)\nStraggle(arliene, merrel)\nnot Average(merrel, arliene)\nStraggle(merrel, beale)\nStraggle(merrel, arliene)\nnot Straggle(merrel, dov)\nTroubling(dov)\nforall x (Average(x, beale) and Average(beale, merrel) -> Straggle(merrel, dov))\nforall x (Straggle(x, merrel) -> Collinear(x))\nforall x (Clerk(x, arliene) and Straggle(arliene, merrel) -> Troubling(arliene))\nforall x (Average(x, dov) and not Straggle(x, dov) -> Clerk(x, arliene))\nforall x (Troubling(x) and Collinear(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Average(x, dov))\nforall x (Unpainful(x) and Average(x, merrel) -> Clerk(x, dov))\nforall x (Boffo(x) and Clerk(x, beale) -> Clerk(x, dov))\n\nUnpainful(arliene)\n\nUnpainful(arliene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The wynne seclude the brianne. The wynne seclude the georg. The wynne is otherwise. The brianne is otherwise. The brianne swig the sly. The sly does not eat the brianne. The sly swig the wynne. The sly swig the brianne. The sly does not need the georg. The georg is otherwise. If someone seclude the wynne and the wynne seclude the sly then the sly swig the georg. If someone swig the sly then they are downward. If someone puzzle the brianne and the brianne swig the sly then the brianne is otherwise. If someone seclude the georg and they do not need the georg then they chase the brianne. All otherwise, downward people are chaldee. If someone is chaldee then they eat the georg. If someone is frizzly and they eat the sly then they chase the georg. If someone is chaldee and they chase the wynne then they chase the georg. The brianne does not eat the sly.", "logic": "\nSeclude(wynne, brianne)\nSeclude(wynne, georg)\nOtherwise(wynne)\nOtherwise(brianne)\nSwig(brianne, sly)\nnot Seclude(sly, brianne)\nSwig(sly, wynne)\nSwig(sly, brianne)\nnot Swig(sly, georg)\nOtherwise(georg)\nforall x (Seclude(x, wynne) and Seclude(wynne, sly) -> Swig(sly, georg))\nforall x (Swig(x, sly) -> Downward(x))\nforall x (Puzzle(x, brianne) and Swig(brianne, sly) -> Otherwise(brianne))\nforall x (Seclude(x, georg) and not Swig(x, georg) -> Puzzle(x, brianne))\nforall x (Otherwise(x) and Downward(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Seclude(x, georg))\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and Seclude(x, sly) -> Puzzle(x, georg))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) and Puzzle(x, wynne) -> Puzzle(x, georg))\n\nnot Seclude(brianne, sly)\n\nnot Seclude(brianne, sly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The alecia waggle the julienne. The alecia waggle the merwin. The alecia is answerable. The julienne is answerable. The julienne balk the alfonso. The alfonso does not eat the julienne. The alfonso balk the alecia. The alfonso balk the julienne. The alfonso does not need the merwin. The merwin is answerable. If someone waggle the alecia and the alecia waggle the alfonso then the alfonso balk the merwin. If someone balk the alfonso then they are mixed. If someone wield the julienne and the julienne balk the alfonso then the julienne is answerable. If someone waggle the merwin and they do not need the merwin then they chase the julienne. All answerable, mixed people are resonant. If someone is resonant then they eat the merwin. If someone is secondhand and they eat the alfonso then they chase the merwin. If someone is resonant and they chase the alecia then they chase the merwin. The merwin balk the julienne.", "logic": "\nWaggle(alecia, julienne)\nWaggle(alecia, merwin)\nAnswerable(alecia)\nAnswerable(julienne)\nBalk(julienne, alfonso)\nnot Waggle(alfonso, julienne)\nBalk(alfonso, alecia)\nBalk(alfonso, julienne)\nnot Balk(alfonso, merwin)\nAnswerable(merwin)\nforall x (Waggle(x, alecia) and Waggle(alecia, alfonso) -> Balk(alfonso, merwin))\nforall x (Balk(x, alfonso) -> Mixed(x))\nforall x (Wield(x, julienne) and Balk(julienne, alfonso) -> Answerable(julienne))\nforall x (Waggle(x, merwin) and not Balk(x, merwin) -> Wield(x, julienne))\nforall x (Answerable(x) and Mixed(x) -> Resonant(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Waggle(x, merwin))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Waggle(x, alfonso) -> Wield(x, merwin))\nforall x (Resonant(x) and Wield(x, alecia) -> Wield(x, merwin))\n\nBalk(merwin, julienne)\n\nBalk(merwin, julienne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The marilee is regnant. The marilee is right. The marilee is not golden. The marilee halt the anet. The marilee repute the anet. The anet is sibilant. The anet is golden. The anet is diabetic. The anet does not like the marilee. The anet patronise the marilee. If someone is golden then they visit the marilee. If someone repute the marilee then they like the anet. If someone halt the anet then they see the anet. If someone is golden then they visit the anet. If someone repute the marilee then they are right. If someone halt the anet and the anet repute the marilee then they see the marilee. If someone patronise the anet and the anet repute the marilee then the marilee repute the anet. If someone patronise the anet and the anet does not see the marilee then the marilee does not see the anet. The marilee is right.", "logic": "\nRegnant(marilee)\nRight(marilee)\nnot Golden(marilee)\nHalt(marilee, anet)\nRepute(marilee, anet)\nSibilant(anet)\nGolden(anet)\nDiabetic(anet)\nnot Halt(anet, marilee)\nPatronise(anet, marilee)\nforall x (Golden(x) -> Repute(x, marilee))\nforall x (Repute(x, marilee) -> Halt(x, anet))\nforall x (Halt(x, anet) -> Patronise(x, anet))\nforall x (Golden(x) -> Repute(x, anet))\nforall x (Repute(x, marilee) -> Right(x))\nforall x (Halt(x, anet) and Repute(anet, marilee) -> Patronise(x, marilee))\nforall x (Patronise(x, anet) and Repute(anet, marilee) -> Repute(marilee, anet))\nforall x (Patronise(x, anet) and not Patronise(anet, marilee) -> not Patronise(marilee, anet))\n\nRight(marilee)\n\ntherefore Right(marilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The marin is solved. The marin is annexal. The marin is not analogical. The marin defraud the zonda. The marin murder the zonda. The zonda is peachy. The zonda is analogical. The zonda is acetonic. The zonda does not like the marin. The zonda misinform the marin. If someone is analogical then they visit the marin. If someone murder the marin then they like the zonda. If someone defraud the zonda then they see the zonda. If someone is analogical then they visit the zonda. If someone murder the marin then they are annexal. If someone defraud the zonda and the zonda murder the marin then they see the marin. If someone misinform the zonda and the zonda murder the marin then the marin murder the zonda. If someone misinform the zonda and the zonda does not see the marin then the marin does not see the zonda. The marin is not solved.", "logic": "\nSolved(marin)\nAnnexal(marin)\nnot Analogical(marin)\nDefraud(marin, zonda)\nMurder(marin, zonda)\nPeachy(zonda)\nAnalogical(zonda)\nAcetonic(zonda)\nnot Defraud(zonda, marin)\nMisinform(zonda, marin)\nforall x (Analogical(x) -> Murder(x, marin))\nforall x (Murder(x, marin) -> Defraud(x, zonda))\nforall x (Defraud(x, zonda) -> Misinform(x, zonda))\nforall x (Analogical(x) -> Murder(x, zonda))\nforall x (Murder(x, marin) -> Annexal(x))\nforall x (Defraud(x, zonda) and Murder(zonda, marin) -> Misinform(x, marin))\nforall x (Misinform(x, zonda) and Murder(zonda, marin) -> Murder(marin, zonda))\nforall x (Misinform(x, zonda) and not Misinform(zonda, marin) -> not Misinform(marin, zonda))\n\nnot Solved(marin)\n\ntherefore Solved(marin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The garcon is garish. The garcon is unshod. The garcon is not umpteen. The garcon liquidise the kirstie. The garcon lodge the kirstie. The kirstie is reactive. The kirstie is umpteen. The kirstie is deviate. The kirstie does not like the garcon. The kirstie deify the garcon. If someone is umpteen then they visit the garcon. If someone lodge the garcon then they like the kirstie. If someone liquidise the kirstie then they see the kirstie. If someone is umpteen then they visit the kirstie. If someone lodge the garcon then they are unshod. If someone liquidise the kirstie and the kirstie lodge the garcon then they see the garcon. If someone deify the kirstie and the kirstie lodge the garcon then the garcon lodge the kirstie. If someone deify the kirstie and the kirstie does not see the garcon then the garcon does not see the kirstie. The garcon deify the kirstie.", "logic": "\nGarish(garcon)\nUnshod(garcon)\nnot Umpteen(garcon)\nLiquidise(garcon, kirstie)\nLodge(garcon, kirstie)\nReactive(kirstie)\nUmpteen(kirstie)\nDeviate(kirstie)\nnot Liquidise(kirstie, garcon)\nDeify(kirstie, garcon)\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Lodge(x, garcon))\nforall x (Lodge(x, garcon) -> Liquidise(x, kirstie))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, kirstie) -> Deify(x, kirstie))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Lodge(x, kirstie))\nforall x (Lodge(x, garcon) -> Unshod(x))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, kirstie) and Lodge(kirstie, garcon) -> Deify(x, garcon))\nforall x (Deify(x, kirstie) and Lodge(kirstie, garcon) -> Lodge(garcon, kirstie))\nforall x (Deify(x, kirstie) and not Deify(kirstie, garcon) -> not Deify(garcon, kirstie))\n\nDeify(garcon, kirstie)\n\nLiquidise(garcon, kirstie) and forall x (Liquidise(x, kirstie) -> Deify(x, kirstie)) -> therefore Deify(garcon, kirstie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The hashim is feminine. The hashim is naughty. The hashim is not sinhala. The hashim decorate the anatol. The hashim gravitate the anatol. The anatol is bionomic. The anatol is sinhala. The anatol is official. The anatol does not like the hashim. The anatol veil the hashim. If someone is sinhala then they visit the hashim. If someone gravitate the hashim then they like the anatol. If someone decorate the anatol then they see the anatol. If someone is sinhala then they visit the anatol. If someone gravitate the hashim then they are naughty. If someone decorate the anatol and the anatol gravitate the hashim then they see the hashim. If someone veil the anatol and the anatol gravitate the hashim then the hashim gravitate the anatol. If someone veil the anatol and the anatol does not see the hashim then the hashim does not see the anatol. The anatol does not visit the anatol.", "logic": "\nFeminine(hashim)\nNaughty(hashim)\nnot Sinhala(hashim)\nDecorate(hashim, anatol)\nGravitate(hashim, anatol)\nBionomic(anatol)\nSinhala(anatol)\nOfficial(anatol)\nnot Decorate(anatol, hashim)\nVeil(anatol, hashim)\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Gravitate(x, hashim))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, hashim) -> Decorate(x, anatol))\nforall x (Decorate(x, anatol) -> Veil(x, anatol))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Gravitate(x, anatol))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, hashim) -> Naughty(x))\nforall x (Decorate(x, anatol) and Gravitate(anatol, hashim) -> Veil(x, hashim))\nforall x (Veil(x, anatol) and Gravitate(anatol, hashim) -> Gravitate(hashim, anatol))\nforall x (Veil(x, anatol) and not Veil(anatol, hashim) -> not Veil(hashim, anatol))\n\nnot Gravitate(anatol, anatol)\n\nSinhala(anatol) and forall x (Sinhala(x) -> Gravitate(x, anatol)) -> therefore Gravitate(anatol, anatol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The duffy is palmar. The duffy is humanist. The duffy is not emphasized. The duffy derate the brit. The duffy deviate the brit. The brit is provoked. The brit is emphasized. The brit is yummy. The brit does not like the duffy. The brit capitulate the duffy. If someone is emphasized then they visit the duffy. If someone deviate the duffy then they like the brit. If someone derate the brit then they see the brit. If someone is emphasized then they visit the brit. If someone deviate the duffy then they are humanist. If someone derate the brit and the brit deviate the duffy then they see the duffy. If someone capitulate the brit and the brit deviate the duffy then the duffy deviate the brit. If someone capitulate the brit and the brit does not see the duffy then the duffy does not see the brit. The brit is humanist.", "logic": "\nPalmar(duffy)\nHumanist(duffy)\nnot Emphasized(duffy)\nDerate(duffy, brit)\nDeviate(duffy, brit)\nProvoked(brit)\nEmphasized(brit)\nYummy(brit)\nnot Derate(brit, duffy)\nCapitulate(brit, duffy)\nforall x (Emphasized(x) -> Deviate(x, duffy))\nforall x (Deviate(x, duffy) -> Derate(x, brit))\nforall x (Derate(x, brit) -> Capitulate(x, brit))\nforall x (Emphasized(x) -> Deviate(x, brit))\nforall x (Deviate(x, duffy) -> Humanist(x))\nforall x (Derate(x, brit) and Deviate(brit, duffy) -> Capitulate(x, duffy))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, brit) and Deviate(brit, duffy) -> Deviate(duffy, brit))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, brit) and not Capitulate(brit, duffy) -> not Capitulate(duffy, brit))\n\nHumanist(brit)\n\nEmphasized(brit) and forall x (Emphasized(x) -> Deviate(x, duffy)) -> therefore Deviate(brit, duffy) Deviate(brit, duffy) and forall x (Deviate(x, duffy) -> Humanist(x)) -> therefore Humanist(brit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The norton is blowy. The norton is manic. The norton is not sealed. The norton evaporate the phelia. The norton hectograph the phelia. The phelia is xlii. The phelia is sealed. The phelia is tinkling. The phelia does not like the norton. The phelia slouch the norton. If someone is sealed then they visit the norton. If someone hectograph the norton then they like the phelia. If someone evaporate the phelia then they see the phelia. If someone is sealed then they visit the phelia. If someone hectograph the norton then they are manic. If someone evaporate the phelia and the phelia hectograph the norton then they see the norton. If someone slouch the phelia and the phelia hectograph the norton then the norton hectograph the phelia. If someone slouch the phelia and the phelia does not see the norton then the norton does not see the phelia. The norton does not see the norton.", "logic": "\nBlowy(norton)\nManic(norton)\nnot Sealed(norton)\nEvaporate(norton, phelia)\nHectograph(norton, phelia)\nXlii(phelia)\nSealed(phelia)\nTinkling(phelia)\nnot Evaporate(phelia, norton)\nSlouch(phelia, norton)\nforall x (Sealed(x) -> Hectograph(x, norton))\nforall x (Hectograph(x, norton) -> Evaporate(x, phelia))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, phelia) -> Slouch(x, phelia))\nforall x (Sealed(x) -> Hectograph(x, phelia))\nforall x (Hectograph(x, norton) -> Manic(x))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, phelia) and Hectograph(phelia, norton) -> Slouch(x, norton))\nforall x (Slouch(x, phelia) and Hectograph(phelia, norton) -> Hectograph(norton, phelia))\nforall x (Slouch(x, phelia) and not Slouch(phelia, norton) -> not Slouch(norton, phelia))\n\nnot Slouch(norton, norton)\n\nSealed(phelia) and forall x (Sealed(x) -> Hectograph(x, norton)) -> therefore Hectograph(phelia, norton) Evaporate(norton, phelia) and Hectograph(phelia, norton) and forall x (Evaporate(x, phelia) and Hectograph(phelia, norton) -> Slouch(x, norton)) -> therefore Slouch(norton, norton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The stepha is ciliated. The stepha is scrub. The stepha is not cultivable. The stepha subdivide the meredeth. The stepha juxtapose the meredeth. The meredeth is putrescent. The meredeth is cultivable. The meredeth is nigerian. The meredeth does not like the stepha. The meredeth backstop the stepha. If someone is cultivable then they visit the stepha. If someone juxtapose the stepha then they like the meredeth. If someone subdivide the meredeth then they see the meredeth. If someone is cultivable then they visit the meredeth. If someone juxtapose the stepha then they are scrub. If someone subdivide the meredeth and the meredeth juxtapose the stepha then they see the stepha. If someone backstop the meredeth and the meredeth juxtapose the stepha then the stepha juxtapose the meredeth. If someone backstop the meredeth and the meredeth does not see the stepha then the stepha does not see the meredeth. The meredeth backstop the meredeth.", "logic": "\nCiliated(stepha)\nScrub(stepha)\nnot Cultivable(stepha)\nSubdivide(stepha, meredeth)\nJuxtapose(stepha, meredeth)\nPutrescent(meredeth)\nCultivable(meredeth)\nNigerian(meredeth)\nnot Subdivide(meredeth, stepha)\nBackstop(meredeth, stepha)\nforall x (Cultivable(x) -> Juxtapose(x, stepha))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, stepha) -> Subdivide(x, meredeth))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, meredeth) -> Backstop(x, meredeth))\nforall x (Cultivable(x) -> Juxtapose(x, meredeth))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, stepha) -> Scrub(x))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, meredeth) and Juxtapose(meredeth, stepha) -> Backstop(x, stepha))\nforall x (Backstop(x, meredeth) and Juxtapose(meredeth, stepha) -> Juxtapose(stepha, meredeth))\nforall x (Backstop(x, meredeth) and not Backstop(meredeth, stepha) -> not Backstop(stepha, meredeth))\n\nBackstop(meredeth, meredeth)\n\nCultivable(meredeth) and forall x (Cultivable(x) -> Juxtapose(x, stepha)) -> therefore Juxtapose(meredeth, stepha) Juxtapose(meredeth, stepha) and forall x (Juxtapose(x, stepha) -> Subdivide(x, meredeth)) -> therefore Subdivide(meredeth, meredeth) Subdivide(meredeth, meredeth) and forall x (Subdivide(x, meredeth) -> Backstop(x, meredeth)) -> therefore Backstop(meredeth, meredeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The rosamond is spanish. The rosamond is ludicrous. The rosamond is not sadistic. The rosamond shout the magna. The rosamond burn the magna. The magna is reflective. The magna is sadistic. The magna is renewed. The magna does not like the rosamond. The magna alkalify the rosamond. If someone is sadistic then they visit the rosamond. If someone burn the rosamond then they like the magna. If someone shout the magna then they see the magna. If someone is sadistic then they visit the magna. If someone burn the rosamond then they are ludicrous. If someone shout the magna and the magna burn the rosamond then they see the rosamond. If someone alkalify the magna and the magna burn the rosamond then the rosamond burn the magna. If someone alkalify the magna and the magna does not see the rosamond then the rosamond does not see the magna. The magna does not see the magna.", "logic": "\nSpanish(rosamond)\nLudicrous(rosamond)\nnot Sadistic(rosamond)\nShout(rosamond, magna)\nBurn(rosamond, magna)\nReflective(magna)\nSadistic(magna)\nRenewed(magna)\nnot Shout(magna, rosamond)\nAlkalify(magna, rosamond)\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> Burn(x, rosamond))\nforall x (Burn(x, rosamond) -> Shout(x, magna))\nforall x (Shout(x, magna) -> Alkalify(x, magna))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> Burn(x, magna))\nforall x (Burn(x, rosamond) -> Ludicrous(x))\nforall x (Shout(x, magna) and Burn(magna, rosamond) -> Alkalify(x, rosamond))\nforall x (Alkalify(x, magna) and Burn(magna, rosamond) -> Burn(rosamond, magna))\nforall x (Alkalify(x, magna) and not Alkalify(magna, rosamond) -> not Alkalify(rosamond, magna))\n\nnot Alkalify(magna, magna)\n\nSadistic(magna) and forall x (Sadistic(x) -> Burn(x, rosamond)) -> therefore Burn(magna, rosamond) Burn(magna, rosamond) and forall x (Burn(x, rosamond) -> Shout(x, magna)) -> therefore Shout(magna, magna) Shout(magna, magna) and forall x (Shout(x, magna) -> Alkalify(x, magna)) -> therefore Alkalify(magna, magna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The crysta is voluble. The crysta is avirulent. The crysta is not lysogenic. The crysta appall the marcel. The crysta croon the marcel. The marcel is meiotic. The marcel is lysogenic. The marcel is devilish. The marcel does not like the crysta. The marcel relativize the crysta. If someone is lysogenic then they visit the crysta. If someone croon the crysta then they like the marcel. If someone appall the marcel then they see the marcel. If someone is lysogenic then they visit the marcel. If someone croon the crysta then they are avirulent. If someone appall the marcel and the marcel croon the crysta then they see the crysta. If someone relativize the marcel and the marcel croon the crysta then the crysta croon the marcel. If someone relativize the marcel and the marcel does not see the crysta then the crysta does not see the marcel. The crysta does not visit the crysta.", "logic": "\nVoluble(crysta)\nAvirulent(crysta)\nnot Lysogenic(crysta)\nAppall(crysta, marcel)\nCroon(crysta, marcel)\nMeiotic(marcel)\nLysogenic(marcel)\nDevilish(marcel)\nnot Appall(marcel, crysta)\nRelativize(marcel, crysta)\nforall x (Lysogenic(x) -> Croon(x, crysta))\nforall x (Croon(x, crysta) -> Appall(x, marcel))\nforall x (Appall(x, marcel) -> Relativize(x, marcel))\nforall x (Lysogenic(x) -> Croon(x, marcel))\nforall x (Croon(x, crysta) -> Avirulent(x))\nforall x (Appall(x, marcel) and Croon(marcel, crysta) -> Relativize(x, crysta))\nforall x (Relativize(x, marcel) and Croon(marcel, crysta) -> Croon(crysta, marcel))\nforall x (Relativize(x, marcel) and not Relativize(marcel, crysta) -> not Relativize(crysta, marcel))\n\nnot Croon(crysta, crysta)\n\nforall x (Lysogenic(x) -> Croon(x, crysta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The karissa is morbid. The karissa is saudi. The karissa is not ignoble. The karissa restrict the rudolph. The karissa flunk the rudolph. The rudolph is unholy. The rudolph is ignoble. The rudolph is entozoan. The rudolph does not like the karissa. The rudolph breathe the karissa. If someone is ignoble then they visit the karissa. If someone flunk the karissa then they like the rudolph. If someone restrict the rudolph then they see the rudolph. If someone is ignoble then they visit the rudolph. If someone flunk the karissa then they are saudi. If someone restrict the rudolph and the rudolph flunk the karissa then they see the karissa. If someone breathe the rudolph and the rudolph flunk the karissa then the karissa flunk the rudolph. If someone breathe the rudolph and the rudolph does not see the karissa then the karissa does not see the rudolph. The karissa restrict the karissa.", "logic": "\nMorbid(karissa)\nSaudi(karissa)\nnot Ignoble(karissa)\nRestrict(karissa, rudolph)\nFlunk(karissa, rudolph)\nUnholy(rudolph)\nIgnoble(rudolph)\nEntozoan(rudolph)\nnot Restrict(rudolph, karissa)\nBreathe(rudolph, karissa)\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Flunk(x, karissa))\nforall x (Flunk(x, karissa) -> Restrict(x, rudolph))\nforall x (Restrict(x, rudolph) -> Breathe(x, rudolph))\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Flunk(x, rudolph))\nforall x (Flunk(x, karissa) -> Saudi(x))\nforall x (Restrict(x, rudolph) and Flunk(rudolph, karissa) -> Breathe(x, karissa))\nforall x (Breathe(x, rudolph) and Flunk(rudolph, karissa) -> Flunk(karissa, rudolph))\nforall x (Breathe(x, rudolph) and not Breathe(rudolph, karissa) -> not Breathe(karissa, rudolph))\n\nRestrict(karissa, karissa)\n\nRestrict(karissa, karissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The amalita is descendent. The amalita is ahorse. The amalita is not alight. The amalita mismate the augie. The amalita admire the augie. The augie is geocentric. The augie is alight. The augie is solvable. The augie does not like the amalita. The augie redact the amalita. If someone is alight then they visit the amalita. If someone admire the amalita then they like the augie. If someone mismate the augie then they see the augie. If someone is alight then they visit the augie. If someone admire the amalita then they are ahorse. If someone mismate the augie and the augie admire the amalita then they see the amalita. If someone redact the augie and the augie admire the amalita then the amalita admire the augie. If someone redact the augie and the augie does not see the amalita then the amalita does not see the augie. The augie is not descendent.", "logic": "\nDescendent(amalita)\nAhorse(amalita)\nnot Alight(amalita)\nMismate(amalita, augie)\nAdmire(amalita, augie)\nGeocentric(augie)\nAlight(augie)\nSolvable(augie)\nnot Mismate(augie, amalita)\nRedact(augie, amalita)\nforall x (Alight(x) -> Admire(x, amalita))\nforall x (Admire(x, amalita) -> Mismate(x, augie))\nforall x (Mismate(x, augie) -> Redact(x, augie))\nforall x (Alight(x) -> Admire(x, augie))\nforall x (Admire(x, amalita) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Mismate(x, augie) and Admire(augie, amalita) -> Redact(x, amalita))\nforall x (Redact(x, augie) and Admire(augie, amalita) -> Admire(amalita, augie))\nforall x (Redact(x, augie) and not Redact(augie, amalita) -> not Redact(amalita, augie))\n\nnot Descendent(augie)\n\nnot Descendent(augie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The daryn is beninese. The daryn is pentagonal. The daryn is not guileful. The daryn perish the karen. The daryn simper the karen. The karen is singsong. The karen is guileful. The karen is subduable. The karen does not like the daryn. The karen turn the daryn. If someone is guileful then they visit the daryn. If someone simper the daryn then they like the karen. If someone perish the karen then they see the karen. If someone is guileful then they visit the karen. If someone simper the daryn then they are pentagonal. If someone perish the karen and the karen simper the daryn then they see the daryn. If someone turn the karen and the karen simper the daryn then the daryn simper the karen. If someone turn the karen and the karen does not see the daryn then the daryn does not see the karen. The daryn is singsong.", "logic": "\nBeninese(daryn)\nPentagonal(daryn)\nnot Guileful(daryn)\nPerish(daryn, karen)\nSimper(daryn, karen)\nSingsong(karen)\nGuileful(karen)\nSubduable(karen)\nnot Perish(karen, daryn)\nTurn(karen, daryn)\nforall x (Guileful(x) -> Simper(x, daryn))\nforall x (Simper(x, daryn) -> Perish(x, karen))\nforall x (Perish(x, karen) -> Turn(x, karen))\nforall x (Guileful(x) -> Simper(x, karen))\nforall x (Simper(x, daryn) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Perish(x, karen) and Simper(karen, daryn) -> Turn(x, daryn))\nforall x (Turn(x, karen) and Simper(karen, daryn) -> Simper(daryn, karen))\nforall x (Turn(x, karen) and not Turn(karen, daryn) -> not Turn(daryn, karen))\n\nSingsong(daryn)\n\nSingsong(daryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The mollee coerce the belva. The patrik is not bailable. The belva does not eat the naoma. The belva is sulphurous. The belva coerce the patrik. The naoma poultice the mollee. The naoma is realised. If the belva poultice the naoma then the naoma is bailable. If something poultice the naoma and the naoma does not eat the mollee then the naoma unmake the mollee. If something unmake the naoma then the naoma unmake the mollee. If the naoma poultice the patrik and the naoma unmake the patrik then the naoma unmake the belva. If something unmake the mollee and the mollee coerce the belva then it poultice the belva. If the belva is statewide and the belva is brooding then the belva unmake the mollee. If something poultice the mollee then it unmake the naoma. If the patrik is bailable and the patrik does not like the naoma then the naoma coerce the mollee. The naoma is realised.", "logic": "\nCoerce(mollee, belva)\nnot Bailable(patrik)\nnot Poultice(belva, naoma)\nSulphurous(belva)\nCoerce(belva, patrik)\nPoultice(naoma, mollee)\nRealised(naoma)\nPoultice(belva, naoma) -> Bailable(naoma)\nforall x (Poultice(x, naoma) and not Poultice(naoma, mollee) -> Unmake(naoma, mollee))\nforall x (Unmake(x, naoma) -> Unmake(naoma, mollee))\nPoultice(naoma, patrik) and Unmake(naoma, patrik) -> Unmake(naoma, belva)\nforall x (Unmake(x, mollee) and Coerce(mollee, belva) -> Poultice(x, belva))\nStatewide(belva) and Brooding(belva) -> Unmake(belva, mollee)\nforall x (Poultice(x, mollee) -> Unmake(x, naoma))\nBailable(patrik) and not Unmake(patrik, naoma) -> Coerce(naoma, mollee)\n\nRealised(naoma)\n\ntherefore Realised(naoma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The dmitri alcoholise the margo. The karoline is not relevant. The margo does not eat the janene. The margo is tripping. The margo alcoholise the karoline. The janene opalize the dmitri. The janene is bilabial. If the margo opalize the janene then the janene is relevant. If something opalize the janene and the janene does not eat the dmitri then the janene prologise the dmitri. If something prologise the janene then the janene prologise the dmitri. If the janene opalize the karoline and the janene prologise the karoline then the janene prologise the margo. If something prologise the dmitri and the dmitri alcoholise the margo then it opalize the margo. If the margo is veterinary and the margo is ravaged then the margo prologise the dmitri. If something opalize the dmitri then it prologise the janene. If the karoline is relevant and the karoline does not like the janene then the janene alcoholise the dmitri. The karoline is relevant.", "logic": "\nAlcoholise(dmitri, margo)\nnot Relevant(karoline)\nnot Opalize(margo, janene)\nTripping(margo)\nAlcoholise(margo, karoline)\nOpalize(janene, dmitri)\nBilabial(janene)\nOpalize(margo, janene) -> Relevant(janene)\nforall x (Opalize(x, janene) and not Opalize(janene, dmitri) -> Prologise(janene, dmitri))\nforall x (Prologise(x, janene) -> Prologise(janene, dmitri))\nOpalize(janene, karoline) and Prologise(janene, karoline) -> Prologise(janene, margo)\nforall x (Prologise(x, dmitri) and Alcoholise(dmitri, margo) -> Opalize(x, margo))\nVeterinary(margo) and Ravaged(margo) -> Prologise(margo, dmitri)\nforall x (Opalize(x, dmitri) -> Prologise(x, janene))\nRelevant(karoline) and not Prologise(karoline, janene) -> Alcoholise(janene, dmitri)\n\nRelevant(karoline)\n\ntherefore not Relevant(karoline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The fredric express the maddy. The ossie is not prepupal. The maddy does not eat the clarey. The maddy is strained. The maddy express the ossie. The clarey found the fredric. The clarey is cardboard. If the maddy found the clarey then the clarey is prepupal. If something found the clarey and the clarey does not eat the fredric then the clarey buffalo the fredric. If something buffalo the clarey then the clarey buffalo the fredric. If the clarey found the ossie and the clarey buffalo the ossie then the clarey buffalo the maddy. If something buffalo the fredric and the fredric express the maddy then it found the maddy. If the maddy is cancelled and the maddy is furnished then the maddy buffalo the fredric. If something found the fredric then it buffalo the clarey. If the ossie is prepupal and the ossie does not like the clarey then the clarey express the fredric. The clarey buffalo the clarey.", "logic": "\nExpress(fredric, maddy)\nnot Prepupal(ossie)\nnot Found(maddy, clarey)\nStrained(maddy)\nExpress(maddy, ossie)\nFound(clarey, fredric)\nCardboard(clarey)\nFound(maddy, clarey) -> Prepupal(clarey)\nforall x (Found(x, clarey) and not Found(clarey, fredric) -> Buffalo(clarey, fredric))\nforall x (Buffalo(x, clarey) -> Buffalo(clarey, fredric))\nFound(clarey, ossie) and Buffalo(clarey, ossie) -> Buffalo(clarey, maddy)\nforall x (Buffalo(x, fredric) and Express(fredric, maddy) -> Found(x, maddy))\nCancelled(maddy) and Furnished(maddy) -> Buffalo(maddy, fredric)\nforall x (Found(x, fredric) -> Buffalo(x, clarey))\nPrepupal(ossie) and not Buffalo(ossie, clarey) -> Express(clarey, fredric)\n\nBuffalo(clarey, clarey)\n\nFound(clarey, fredric) and forall x (Found(x, fredric) -> Buffalo(x, clarey)) -> therefore Buffalo(clarey, clarey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The melli overjoy the aurel. The pollyanna is not infernal. The aurel does not eat the salim. The aurel is gloomful. The aurel overjoy the pollyanna. The salim mention the melli. The salim is adenoidal. If the aurel mention the salim then the salim is infernal. If something mention the salim and the salim does not eat the melli then the salim miscast the melli. If something miscast the salim then the salim miscast the melli. If the salim mention the pollyanna and the salim miscast the pollyanna then the salim miscast the aurel. If something miscast the melli and the melli overjoy the aurel then it mention the aurel. If the aurel is ideal and the aurel is offensive then the aurel miscast the melli. If something mention the melli then it miscast the salim. If the pollyanna is infernal and the pollyanna does not like the salim then the salim overjoy the melli. The salim does not like the salim.", "logic": "\nOverjoy(melli, aurel)\nnot Infernal(pollyanna)\nnot Mention(aurel, salim)\nGloomful(aurel)\nOverjoy(aurel, pollyanna)\nMention(salim, melli)\nAdenoidal(salim)\nMention(aurel, salim) -> Infernal(salim)\nforall x (Mention(x, salim) and not Mention(salim, melli) -> Miscast(salim, melli))\nforall x (Miscast(x, salim) -> Miscast(salim, melli))\nMention(salim, pollyanna) and Miscast(salim, pollyanna) -> Miscast(salim, aurel)\nforall x (Miscast(x, melli) and Overjoy(melli, aurel) -> Mention(x, aurel))\nIdeal(aurel) and Offensive(aurel) -> Miscast(aurel, melli)\nforall x (Mention(x, melli) -> Miscast(x, salim))\nInfernal(pollyanna) and not Miscast(pollyanna, salim) -> Overjoy(salim, melli)\n\nnot Miscast(salim, salim)\n\nMention(salim, melli) and forall x (Mention(x, melli) -> Miscast(x, salim)) -> therefore Miscast(salim, salim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The sophie iron the dorree. The priscella is not disgraced. The dorree does not eat the pen. The dorree is pastoral. The dorree iron the priscella. The pen doom the sophie. The pen is porcine. If the dorree doom the pen then the pen is disgraced. If something doom the pen and the pen does not eat the sophie then the pen trek the sophie. If something trek the pen then the pen trek the sophie. If the pen doom the priscella and the pen trek the priscella then the pen trek the dorree. If something trek the sophie and the sophie iron the dorree then it doom the dorree. If the dorree is harnessed and the dorree is lactogenic then the dorree trek the sophie. If something doom the sophie then it trek the pen. If the priscella is disgraced and the priscella does not like the pen then the pen iron the sophie. The pen trek the sophie.", "logic": "\nIron(sophie, dorree)\nnot Disgraced(priscella)\nnot Doom(dorree, pen)\nPastoral(dorree)\nIron(dorree, priscella)\nDoom(pen, sophie)\nPorcine(pen)\nDoom(dorree, pen) -> Disgraced(pen)\nforall x (Doom(x, pen) and not Doom(pen, sophie) -> Trek(pen, sophie))\nforall x (Trek(x, pen) -> Trek(pen, sophie))\nDoom(pen, priscella) and Trek(pen, priscella) -> Trek(pen, dorree)\nforall x (Trek(x, sophie) and Iron(sophie, dorree) -> Doom(x, dorree))\nHarnessed(dorree) and Lactogenic(dorree) -> Trek(dorree, sophie)\nforall x (Doom(x, sophie) -> Trek(x, pen))\nDisgraced(priscella) and not Trek(priscella, pen) -> Iron(pen, sophie)\n\nTrek(pen, sophie)\n\nDoom(pen, sophie) and forall x (Doom(x, sophie) -> Trek(x, pen)) -> therefore Trek(pen, pen) Trek(pen, pen) and forall x (Trek(x, pen) -> Trek(pen, sophie)) -> therefore Trek(pen, sophie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The yehudit deviate the katleen. The priscilla is not athirst. The katleen does not eat the aline. The katleen is prosodic. The katleen deviate the priscilla. The aline general the yehudit. The aline is bowelless. If the katleen general the aline then the aline is athirst. If something general the aline and the aline does not eat the yehudit then the aline bootstrap the yehudit. If something bootstrap the aline then the aline bootstrap the yehudit. If the aline general the priscilla and the aline bootstrap the priscilla then the aline bootstrap the katleen. If something bootstrap the yehudit and the yehudit deviate the katleen then it general the katleen. If the katleen is unlucky and the katleen is operating then the katleen bootstrap the yehudit. If something general the yehudit then it bootstrap the aline. If the priscilla is athirst and the priscilla does not like the aline then the aline deviate the yehudit. The aline does not like the yehudit.", "logic": "\nDeviate(yehudit, katleen)\nnot Athirst(priscilla)\nnot General(katleen, aline)\nProsodic(katleen)\nDeviate(katleen, priscilla)\nGeneral(aline, yehudit)\nBowelless(aline)\nGeneral(katleen, aline) -> Athirst(aline)\nforall x (General(x, aline) and not General(aline, yehudit) -> Bootstrap(aline, yehudit))\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, aline) -> Bootstrap(aline, yehudit))\nGeneral(aline, priscilla) and Bootstrap(aline, priscilla) -> Bootstrap(aline, katleen)\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, yehudit) and Deviate(yehudit, katleen) -> General(x, katleen))\nUnlucky(katleen) and Operating(katleen) -> Bootstrap(katleen, yehudit)\nforall x (General(x, yehudit) -> Bootstrap(x, aline))\nAthirst(priscilla) and not Bootstrap(priscilla, aline) -> Deviate(aline, yehudit)\n\nnot Bootstrap(aline, yehudit)\n\nGeneral(aline, yehudit) and forall x (General(x, yehudit) -> Bootstrap(x, aline)) -> therefore Bootstrap(aline, aline) Bootstrap(aline, aline) and forall x (Bootstrap(x, aline) -> Bootstrap(aline, yehudit)) -> therefore Bootstrap(aline, yehudit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The effie groom the lavina. The coleen is not remiss. The lavina does not eat the quinlan. The lavina is dried. The lavina groom the coleen. The quinlan piece the effie. The quinlan is hominine. If the lavina piece the quinlan then the quinlan is remiss. If something piece the quinlan and the quinlan does not eat the effie then the quinlan stick the effie. If something stick the quinlan then the quinlan stick the effie. If the quinlan piece the coleen and the quinlan stick the coleen then the quinlan stick the lavina. If something stick the effie and the effie groom the lavina then it piece the lavina. If the lavina is ceramic and the lavina is dogged then the lavina stick the effie. If something piece the effie then it stick the quinlan. If the coleen is remiss and the coleen does not like the quinlan then the quinlan groom the effie. The quinlan piece the lavina.", "logic": "\nGroom(effie, lavina)\nnot Remiss(coleen)\nnot Piece(lavina, quinlan)\nDried(lavina)\nGroom(lavina, coleen)\nPiece(quinlan, effie)\nHominine(quinlan)\nPiece(lavina, quinlan) -> Remiss(quinlan)\nforall x (Piece(x, quinlan) and not Piece(quinlan, effie) -> Stick(quinlan, effie))\nforall x (Stick(x, quinlan) -> Stick(quinlan, effie))\nPiece(quinlan, coleen) and Stick(quinlan, coleen) -> Stick(quinlan, lavina)\nforall x (Stick(x, effie) and Groom(effie, lavina) -> Piece(x, lavina))\nCeramic(lavina) and Dogged(lavina) -> Stick(lavina, effie)\nforall x (Piece(x, effie) -> Stick(x, quinlan))\nRemiss(coleen) and not Stick(coleen, quinlan) -> Groom(quinlan, effie)\n\nPiece(quinlan, lavina)\n\nPiece(quinlan, effie) and forall x (Piece(x, effie) -> Stick(x, quinlan)) -> therefore Stick(quinlan, quinlan) Stick(quinlan, quinlan) and forall x (Stick(x, quinlan) -> Stick(quinlan, effie)) -> therefore Stick(quinlan, effie) Stick(quinlan, effie) and Groom(effie, lavina) and forall x (Stick(x, effie) and Groom(effie, lavina) -> Piece(x, lavina)) -> therefore Piece(quinlan, lavina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The alejandro isomerize the allene. The bucky is not provoking. The allene does not eat the flossi. The allene is afghan. The allene isomerize the bucky. The flossi calcine the alejandro. The flossi is concurring. If the allene calcine the flossi then the flossi is provoking. If something calcine the flossi and the flossi does not eat the alejandro then the flossi till the alejandro. If something till the flossi then the flossi till the alejandro. If the flossi calcine the bucky and the flossi till the bucky then the flossi till the allene. If something till the alejandro and the alejandro isomerize the allene then it calcine the allene. If the allene is crapulous and the allene is roguish then the allene till the alejandro. If something calcine the alejandro then it till the flossi. If the bucky is provoking and the bucky does not like the flossi then the flossi isomerize the alejandro. The flossi does not eat the allene.", "logic": "\nIsomerize(alejandro, allene)\nnot Provoking(bucky)\nnot Calcine(allene, flossi)\nAfghan(allene)\nIsomerize(allene, bucky)\nCalcine(flossi, alejandro)\nConcurring(flossi)\nCalcine(allene, flossi) -> Provoking(flossi)\nforall x (Calcine(x, flossi) and not Calcine(flossi, alejandro) -> Till(flossi, alejandro))\nforall x (Till(x, flossi) -> Till(flossi, alejandro))\nCalcine(flossi, bucky) and Till(flossi, bucky) -> Till(flossi, allene)\nforall x (Till(x, alejandro) and Isomerize(alejandro, allene) -> Calcine(x, allene))\nCrapulous(allene) and Roguish(allene) -> Till(allene, alejandro)\nforall x (Calcine(x, alejandro) -> Till(x, flossi))\nProvoking(bucky) and not Till(bucky, flossi) -> Isomerize(flossi, alejandro)\n\nnot Calcine(flossi, allene)\n\nCalcine(flossi, alejandro) and forall x (Calcine(x, alejandro) -> Till(x, flossi)) -> therefore Till(flossi, flossi) Till(flossi, flossi) and forall x (Till(x, flossi) -> Till(flossi, alejandro)) -> therefore Till(flossi, alejandro) Till(flossi, alejandro) and Isomerize(alejandro, allene) and forall x (Till(x, alejandro) and Isomerize(alejandro, allene) -> Calcine(x, allene)) -> therefore Calcine(flossi, allene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The phineas muster the bradley. The urban is not depilatory. The bradley does not eat the rivalee. The bradley is optimistic. The bradley muster the urban. The rivalee borrow the phineas. The rivalee is vowellike. If the bradley borrow the rivalee then the rivalee is depilatory. If something borrow the rivalee and the rivalee does not eat the phineas then the rivalee rend the phineas. If something rend the rivalee then the rivalee rend the phineas. If the rivalee borrow the urban and the rivalee rend the urban then the rivalee rend the bradley. If something rend the phineas and the phineas muster the bradley then it borrow the bradley. If the bradley is disklike and the bradley is frenzied then the bradley rend the phineas. If something borrow the phineas then it rend the rivalee. If the urban is depilatory and the urban does not like the rivalee then the rivalee muster the phineas. The urban does not like the rivalee.", "logic": "\nMuster(phineas, bradley)\nnot Depilatory(urban)\nnot Borrow(bradley, rivalee)\nOptimistic(bradley)\nMuster(bradley, urban)\nBorrow(rivalee, phineas)\nVowellike(rivalee)\nBorrow(bradley, rivalee) -> Depilatory(rivalee)\nforall x (Borrow(x, rivalee) and not Borrow(rivalee, phineas) -> Rend(rivalee, phineas))\nforall x (Rend(x, rivalee) -> Rend(rivalee, phineas))\nBorrow(rivalee, urban) and Rend(rivalee, urban) -> Rend(rivalee, bradley)\nforall x (Rend(x, phineas) and Muster(phineas, bradley) -> Borrow(x, bradley))\nDisklike(bradley) and Frenzied(bradley) -> Rend(bradley, phineas)\nforall x (Borrow(x, phineas) -> Rend(x, rivalee))\nDepilatory(urban) and not Rend(urban, rivalee) -> Muster(rivalee, phineas)\n\nnot Rend(urban, rivalee)\n\nforall x (Borrow(x, phineas) -> Rend(x, rivalee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The venkat spool the steffen. The horst is not perplexing. The steffen does not eat the tove. The steffen is cloisonne. The steffen spool the horst. The tove malign the venkat. The tove is paralyzed. If the steffen malign the tove then the tove is perplexing. If something malign the tove and the tove does not eat the venkat then the tove undergird the venkat. If something undergird the tove then the tove undergird the venkat. If the tove malign the horst and the tove undergird the horst then the tove undergird the steffen. If something undergird the venkat and the venkat spool the steffen then it malign the steffen. If the steffen is behindhand and the steffen is resistible then the steffen undergird the venkat. If something malign the venkat then it undergird the tove. If the horst is perplexing and the horst does not like the tove then the tove spool the venkat. The tove undergird the steffen.", "logic": "\nSpool(venkat, steffen)\nnot Perplexing(horst)\nnot Malign(steffen, tove)\nCloisonne(steffen)\nSpool(steffen, horst)\nMalign(tove, venkat)\nParalyzed(tove)\nMalign(steffen, tove) -> Perplexing(tove)\nforall x (Malign(x, tove) and not Malign(tove, venkat) -> Undergird(tove, venkat))\nforall x (Undergird(x, tove) -> Undergird(tove, venkat))\nMalign(tove, horst) and Undergird(tove, horst) -> Undergird(tove, steffen)\nforall x (Undergird(x, venkat) and Spool(venkat, steffen) -> Malign(x, steffen))\nBehindhand(steffen) and Resistible(steffen) -> Undergird(steffen, venkat)\nforall x (Malign(x, venkat) -> Undergird(x, tove))\nPerplexing(horst) and not Undergird(horst, tove) -> Spool(tove, venkat)\n\nUndergird(tove, steffen)\n\nMalign(tove, horst) and Undergird(tove, horst) -> Undergird(tove, steffen) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The corby bare the hatty. The darell is not plain. The hatty does not eat the rachel. The hatty is approved. The hatty bare the darell. The rachel upraise the corby. The rachel is terrified. If the hatty upraise the rachel then the rachel is plain. If something upraise the rachel and the rachel does not eat the corby then the rachel discolor the corby. If something discolor the rachel then the rachel discolor the corby. If the rachel upraise the darell and the rachel discolor the darell then the rachel discolor the hatty. If something discolor the corby and the corby bare the hatty then it upraise the hatty. If the hatty is inharmonic and the hatty is edited then the hatty discolor the corby. If something upraise the corby then it discolor the rachel. If the darell is plain and the darell does not like the rachel then the rachel bare the corby. The hatty does not eat the hatty.", "logic": "\nBare(corby, hatty)\nnot Plain(darell)\nnot Upraise(hatty, rachel)\nApproved(hatty)\nBare(hatty, darell)\nUpraise(rachel, corby)\nTerrified(rachel)\nUpraise(hatty, rachel) -> Plain(rachel)\nforall x (Upraise(x, rachel) and not Upraise(rachel, corby) -> Discolor(rachel, corby))\nforall x (Discolor(x, rachel) -> Discolor(rachel, corby))\nUpraise(rachel, darell) and Discolor(rachel, darell) -> Discolor(rachel, hatty)\nforall x (Discolor(x, corby) and Bare(corby, hatty) -> Upraise(x, hatty))\nInharmonic(hatty) and Edited(hatty) -> Discolor(hatty, corby)\nforall x (Upraise(x, corby) -> Discolor(x, rachel))\nPlain(darell) and not Discolor(darell, rachel) -> Bare(rachel, corby)\n\nnot Upraise(hatty, hatty)\n\nforall x (Discolor(x, corby) and Bare(corby, hatty) -> Upraise(x, hatty)) <- Inharmonic(hatty) and Edited(hatty) -> Discolor(hatty, corby) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The karol saltate the maribel. The dwayne is not deductive. The maribel does not eat the norris. The maribel is ninefold. The maribel saltate the dwayne. The norris sequester the karol. The norris is vaporish. If the maribel sequester the norris then the norris is deductive. If something sequester the norris and the norris does not eat the karol then the norris evaluate the karol. If something evaluate the norris then the norris evaluate the karol. If the norris sequester the dwayne and the norris evaluate the dwayne then the norris evaluate the maribel. If something evaluate the karol and the karol saltate the maribel then it sequester the maribel. If the maribel is durable and the maribel is sorrel then the maribel evaluate the karol. If something sequester the karol then it evaluate the norris. If the dwayne is deductive and the dwayne does not like the norris then the norris saltate the karol. The norris is deductive.", "logic": "\nSaltate(karol, maribel)\nnot Deductive(dwayne)\nnot Sequester(maribel, norris)\nNinefold(maribel)\nSaltate(maribel, dwayne)\nSequester(norris, karol)\nVaporish(norris)\nSequester(maribel, norris) -> Deductive(norris)\nforall x (Sequester(x, norris) and not Sequester(norris, karol) -> Evaluate(norris, karol))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, norris) -> Evaluate(norris, karol))\nSequester(norris, dwayne) and Evaluate(norris, dwayne) -> Evaluate(norris, maribel)\nforall x (Evaluate(x, karol) and Saltate(karol, maribel) -> Sequester(x, maribel))\nDurable(maribel) and Sorrel(maribel) -> Evaluate(maribel, karol)\nforall x (Sequester(x, karol) -> Evaluate(x, norris))\nDeductive(dwayne) and not Evaluate(dwayne, norris) -> Saltate(norris, karol)\n\nDeductive(norris)\n\nSequester(maribel, norris) -> Deductive(norris) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The jordan plicate the cher. The lainey is not sufferable. The cher does not eat the aileen. The cher is nonmodern. The cher plicate the lainey. The aileen unstrap the jordan. The aileen is submarine. If the cher unstrap the aileen then the aileen is sufferable. If something unstrap the aileen and the aileen does not eat the jordan then the aileen assure the jordan. If something assure the aileen then the aileen assure the jordan. If the aileen unstrap the lainey and the aileen assure the lainey then the aileen assure the cher. If something assure the jordan and the jordan plicate the cher then it unstrap the cher. If the cher is virulent and the cher is embattled then the cher assure the jordan. If something unstrap the jordan then it assure the aileen. If the lainey is sufferable and the lainey does not like the aileen then the aileen plicate the jordan. The cher does not like the lainey.", "logic": "\nPlicate(jordan, cher)\nnot Sufferable(lainey)\nnot Unstrap(cher, aileen)\nNonmodern(cher)\nPlicate(cher, lainey)\nUnstrap(aileen, jordan)\nSubmarine(aileen)\nUnstrap(cher, aileen) -> Sufferable(aileen)\nforall x (Unstrap(x, aileen) and not Unstrap(aileen, jordan) -> Assure(aileen, jordan))\nforall x (Assure(x, aileen) -> Assure(aileen, jordan))\nUnstrap(aileen, lainey) and Assure(aileen, lainey) -> Assure(aileen, cher)\nforall x (Assure(x, jordan) and Plicate(jordan, cher) -> Unstrap(x, cher))\nVirulent(cher) and Embattled(cher) -> Assure(cher, jordan)\nforall x (Unstrap(x, jordan) -> Assure(x, aileen))\nSufferable(lainey) and not Assure(lainey, aileen) -> Plicate(aileen, jordan)\n\nnot Assure(cher, lainey)\n\nnot Assure(cher, lainey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The colin succuss the maryl. The mattie is not volar. The maryl does not eat the lilah. The maryl is nonviolent. The maryl succuss the mattie. The lilah handbuild the colin. The lilah is dowerless. If the maryl handbuild the lilah then the lilah is volar. If something handbuild the lilah and the lilah does not eat the colin then the lilah instrument the colin. If something instrument the lilah then the lilah instrument the colin. If the lilah handbuild the mattie and the lilah instrument the mattie then the lilah instrument the maryl. If something instrument the colin and the colin succuss the maryl then it handbuild the maryl. If the maryl is boughless and the maryl is chalky then the maryl instrument the colin. If something handbuild the colin then it instrument the lilah. If the mattie is volar and the mattie does not like the lilah then the lilah succuss the colin. The maryl is chalky.", "logic": "\nSuccuss(colin, maryl)\nnot Volar(mattie)\nnot Handbuild(maryl, lilah)\nNonviolent(maryl)\nSuccuss(maryl, mattie)\nHandbuild(lilah, colin)\nDowerless(lilah)\nHandbuild(maryl, lilah) -> Volar(lilah)\nforall x (Handbuild(x, lilah) and not Handbuild(lilah, colin) -> Instrument(lilah, colin))\nforall x (Instrument(x, lilah) -> Instrument(lilah, colin))\nHandbuild(lilah, mattie) and Instrument(lilah, mattie) -> Instrument(lilah, maryl)\nforall x (Instrument(x, colin) and Succuss(colin, maryl) -> Handbuild(x, maryl))\nBoughless(maryl) and Chalky(maryl) -> Instrument(maryl, colin)\nforall x (Handbuild(x, colin) -> Instrument(x, lilah))\nVolar(mattie) and not Instrument(mattie, lilah) -> Succuss(lilah, colin)\n\nChalky(maryl)\n\nChalky(maryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The nichols churr the felicity. The lou is not pleural. The felicity does not eat the puff. The felicity is salvific. The felicity churr the lou. The puff cater the nichols. The puff is assistant. If the felicity cater the puff then the puff is pleural. If something cater the puff and the puff does not eat the nichols then the puff spay the nichols. If something spay the puff then the puff spay the nichols. If the puff cater the lou and the puff spay the lou then the puff spay the felicity. If something spay the nichols and the nichols churr the felicity then it cater the felicity. If the felicity is isthmian and the felicity is crippling then the felicity spay the nichols. If something cater the nichols then it spay the puff. If the lou is pleural and the lou does not like the puff then the puff churr the nichols. The puff does not eat the lou.", "logic": "\nChurr(nichols, felicity)\nnot Pleural(lou)\nnot Cater(felicity, puff)\nSalvific(felicity)\nChurr(felicity, lou)\nCater(puff, nichols)\nAssistant(puff)\nCater(felicity, puff) -> Pleural(puff)\nforall x (Cater(x, puff) and not Cater(puff, nichols) -> Spay(puff, nichols))\nforall x (Spay(x, puff) -> Spay(puff, nichols))\nCater(puff, lou) and Spay(puff, lou) -> Spay(puff, felicity)\nforall x (Spay(x, nichols) and Churr(nichols, felicity) -> Cater(x, felicity))\nIsthmian(felicity) and Crippling(felicity) -> Spay(felicity, nichols)\nforall x (Cater(x, nichols) -> Spay(x, puff))\nPleural(lou) and not Spay(lou, puff) -> Churr(puff, nichols)\n\nnot Cater(puff, lou)\n\nnot Cater(puff, lou) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The pier appal the joyce. The manya is not bulbous. The joyce does not eat the aloysius. The joyce is maniclike. The joyce appal the manya. The aloysius feminize the pier. The aloysius is vast. If the joyce feminize the aloysius then the aloysius is bulbous. If something feminize the aloysius and the aloysius does not eat the pier then the aloysius communize the pier. If something communize the aloysius then the aloysius communize the pier. If the aloysius feminize the manya and the aloysius communize the manya then the aloysius communize the joyce. If something communize the pier and the pier appal the joyce then it feminize the joyce. If the joyce is senescent and the joyce is special then the joyce communize the pier. If something feminize the pier then it communize the aloysius. If the manya is bulbous and the manya does not like the aloysius then the aloysius appal the pier. The pier is bulbous.", "logic": "\nAppal(pier, joyce)\nnot Bulbous(manya)\nnot Feminize(joyce, aloysius)\nManiclike(joyce)\nAppal(joyce, manya)\nFeminize(aloysius, pier)\nVast(aloysius)\nFeminize(joyce, aloysius) -> Bulbous(aloysius)\nforall x (Feminize(x, aloysius) and not Feminize(aloysius, pier) -> Communize(aloysius, pier))\nforall x (Communize(x, aloysius) -> Communize(aloysius, pier))\nFeminize(aloysius, manya) and Communize(aloysius, manya) -> Communize(aloysius, joyce)\nforall x (Communize(x, pier) and Appal(pier, joyce) -> Feminize(x, joyce))\nSenescent(joyce) and Special(joyce) -> Communize(joyce, pier)\nforall x (Feminize(x, pier) -> Communize(x, aloysius))\nBulbous(manya) and not Communize(manya, aloysius) -> Appal(aloysius, pier)\n\nBulbous(pier)\n\nBulbous(pier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "Shirley is motherlike. Shirley is venomous. Shirley is ultimo. Noe is apiculate. Noe is not venomous. Windy is apiculate. Windy is subsurface. Windy is ultimo. Cindra is apiculate. Cindra is motherlike. Cindra is corrupted. Cindra is numbing. Red people are ultimo. If Shirley is numbing then Shirley is apiculate. All numbing people are corrupted. All corrupted people are motherlike. If someone is venomous then they are numbing. If Cindra is not apiculate then Cindra is not motherlike. Green, corrupted people are not subsurface. If Noe is venomous and Noe is not numbing then Noe is not ultimo. Windy is ultimo.", "logic": "\nMotherlike(shirley)\nVenomous(shirley)\nUltimo(shirley)\nApiculate(noe)\nnot Venomous(noe)\nApiculate(windy)\nSubsurface(windy)\nUltimo(windy)\nApiculate(cindra)\nMotherlike(cindra)\nCorrupted(cindra)\nNumbing(cindra)\nforall x (Corrupted(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nNumbing(shirley) -> Apiculate(shirley)\nforall x (Numbing(x) -> Corrupted(x))\nforall x (Corrupted(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Venomous(x) -> Numbing(x))\nnot Apiculate(cindra) -> not Motherlike(cindra)\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and Corrupted(x) -> not Subsurface(x))\nVenomous(noe) and not Numbing(noe) -> not Ultimo(noe)\n\nUltimo(windy)\n\ntherefore Ultimo(windy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Jessica is ghostlike. Jessica is literate. Jessica is singular. Rebekkah is fibrinous. Rebekkah is not literate. Bree is fibrinous. Bree is thready. Bree is singular. Judd is fibrinous. Judd is ghostlike. Judd is critical. Judd is saucy. Red people are singular. If Jessica is saucy then Jessica is fibrinous. All saucy people are critical. All critical people are ghostlike. If someone is literate then they are saucy. If Judd is not fibrinous then Judd is not ghostlike. Green, critical people are not thready. If Rebekkah is literate and Rebekkah is not saucy then Rebekkah is not singular. Rebekkah is literate.", "logic": "\nGhostlike(jessica)\nLiterate(jessica)\nSingular(jessica)\nFibrinous(rebekkah)\nnot Literate(rebekkah)\nFibrinous(bree)\nThready(bree)\nSingular(bree)\nFibrinous(judd)\nGhostlike(judd)\nCritical(judd)\nSaucy(judd)\nforall x (Critical(x) -> Singular(x))\nSaucy(jessica) -> Fibrinous(jessica)\nforall x (Saucy(x) -> Critical(x))\nforall x (Critical(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Literate(x) -> Saucy(x))\nnot Fibrinous(judd) -> not Ghostlike(judd)\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) and Critical(x) -> not Thready(x))\nLiterate(rebekkah) and not Saucy(rebekkah) -> not Singular(rebekkah)\n\nLiterate(rebekkah)\n\ntherefore not Literate(rebekkah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Florinda is slav. Florinda is thirteen. Florinda is occurrent. Janela is unsweet. Janela is not thirteen. Bellamy is unsweet. Bellamy is vertebral. Bellamy is occurrent. Leonelle is unsweet. Leonelle is slav. Leonelle is nonskid. Leonelle is wavering. Red people are occurrent. If Florinda is wavering then Florinda is unsweet. All wavering people are nonskid. All nonskid people are slav. If someone is thirteen then they are wavering. If Leonelle is not unsweet then Leonelle is not slav. Green, nonskid people are not vertebral. If Janela is thirteen and Janela is not wavering then Janela is not occurrent. Leonelle is occurrent.", "logic": "\nSlav(florinda)\nThirteen(florinda)\nOccurrent(florinda)\nUnsweet(janela)\nnot Thirteen(janela)\nUnsweet(bellamy)\nVertebral(bellamy)\nOccurrent(bellamy)\nUnsweet(leonelle)\nSlav(leonelle)\nNonskid(leonelle)\nWavering(leonelle)\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Occurrent(x))\nWavering(florinda) -> Unsweet(florinda)\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Nonskid(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Slav(x))\nforall x (Thirteen(x) -> Wavering(x))\nnot Unsweet(leonelle) -> not Slav(leonelle)\nforall x (Slav(x) and Nonskid(x) -> not Vertebral(x))\nThirteen(janela) and not Wavering(janela) -> not Occurrent(janela)\n\nOccurrent(leonelle)\n\nNonskid(leonelle) and forall x (Nonskid(x) -> Occurrent(x)) -> therefore Occurrent(leonelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Hatti is anatomic. Hatti is agonising. Hatti is unforceful. Silva is composite. Silva is not agonising. Hiram is composite. Hiram is inbuilt. Hiram is unforceful. Bryce is composite. Bryce is anatomic. Bryce is caecal. Bryce is bony. Red people are unforceful. If Hatti is bony then Hatti is composite. All bony people are caecal. All caecal people are anatomic. If someone is agonising then they are bony. If Bryce is not composite then Bryce is not anatomic. Green, caecal people are not inbuilt. If Silva is agonising and Silva is not bony then Silva is not unforceful. Bryce is inbuilt.", "logic": "\nAnatomic(hatti)\nAgonising(hatti)\nUnforceful(hatti)\nComposite(silva)\nnot Agonising(silva)\nComposite(hiram)\nInbuilt(hiram)\nUnforceful(hiram)\nComposite(bryce)\nAnatomic(bryce)\nCaecal(bryce)\nBony(bryce)\nforall x (Caecal(x) -> Unforceful(x))\nBony(hatti) -> Composite(hatti)\nforall x (Bony(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) -> Anatomic(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Bony(x))\nnot Composite(bryce) -> not Anatomic(bryce)\nforall x (Anatomic(x) and Caecal(x) -> not Inbuilt(x))\nAgonising(silva) and not Bony(silva) -> not Unforceful(silva)\n\nInbuilt(bryce)\n\nAnatomic(bryce) and Caecal(bryce) and forall x (Anatomic(x) and Caecal(x) -> not Inbuilt(x)) -> therefore not Inbuilt(bryce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Trixie is blame. Trixie is sanctified. Trixie is allusive. Analiese is norman. Analiese is not sanctified. Flem is norman. Flem is busybodied. Flem is allusive. Jed is norman. Jed is blame. Jed is pinnatifid. Jed is serologic. Red people are allusive. If Trixie is serologic then Trixie is norman. All serologic people are pinnatifid. All pinnatifid people are blame. If someone is sanctified then they are serologic. If Jed is not norman then Jed is not blame. Green, pinnatifid people are not busybodied. If Analiese is sanctified and Analiese is not serologic then Analiese is not allusive. Trixie is pinnatifid.", "logic": "\nBlame(trixie)\nSanctified(trixie)\nAllusive(trixie)\nNorman(analiese)\nnot Sanctified(analiese)\nNorman(flem)\nBusybodied(flem)\nAllusive(flem)\nNorman(jed)\nBlame(jed)\nPinnatifid(jed)\nSerologic(jed)\nforall x (Pinnatifid(x) -> Allusive(x))\nSerologic(trixie) -> Norman(trixie)\nforall x (Serologic(x) -> Pinnatifid(x))\nforall x (Pinnatifid(x) -> Blame(x))\nforall x (Sanctified(x) -> Serologic(x))\nnot Norman(jed) -> not Blame(jed)\nforall x (Blame(x) and Pinnatifid(x) -> not Busybodied(x))\nSanctified(analiese) and not Serologic(analiese) -> not Allusive(analiese)\n\nPinnatifid(trixie)\n\nSanctified(trixie) and forall x (Sanctified(x) -> Serologic(x)) -> therefore Serologic(trixie) Serologic(trixie) and forall x (Serologic(x) -> Pinnatifid(x)) -> therefore Pinnatifid(trixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "May is violet. May is uncial. May is droopy. Rhody is humid. Rhody is not uncial. Bernadina is humid. Bernadina is eleventh. Bernadina is droopy. Otho is humid. Otho is violet. Otho is dyadic. Otho is received. Red people are droopy. If May is received then May is humid. All received people are dyadic. All dyadic people are violet. If someone is uncial then they are received. If Otho is not humid then Otho is not violet. Green, dyadic people are not eleventh. If Rhody is uncial and Rhody is not received then Rhody is not droopy. May is not humid.", "logic": "\nViolet(may)\nUncial(may)\nDroopy(may)\nHumid(rhody)\nnot Uncial(rhody)\nHumid(bernadina)\nEleventh(bernadina)\nDroopy(bernadina)\nHumid(otho)\nViolet(otho)\nDyadic(otho)\nReceived(otho)\nforall x (Dyadic(x) -> Droopy(x))\nReceived(may) -> Humid(may)\nforall x (Received(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nforall x (Dyadic(x) -> Violet(x))\nforall x (Uncial(x) -> Received(x))\nnot Humid(otho) -> not Violet(otho)\nforall x (Violet(x) and Dyadic(x) -> not Eleventh(x))\nUncial(rhody) and not Received(rhody) -> not Droopy(rhody)\n\nnot Humid(may)\n\nUncial(may) and forall x (Uncial(x) -> Received(x)) -> therefore Received(may) Received(may) and Received(may) -> Humid(may) -> therefore Humid(may)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Dinny is ochre. Dinny is mucky. Dinny is oafish. Shandee is splendid. Shandee is not mucky. Emlynne is splendid. Emlynne is ptolemaic. Emlynne is oafish. Gennie is splendid. Gennie is ochre. Gennie is rewardful. Gennie is reposeful. Red people are oafish. If Dinny is reposeful then Dinny is splendid. All reposeful people are rewardful. All rewardful people are ochre. If someone is mucky then they are reposeful. If Gennie is not splendid then Gennie is not ochre. Green, rewardful people are not ptolemaic. If Shandee is mucky and Shandee is not reposeful then Shandee is not oafish. Dinny is not ptolemaic.", "logic": "\nOchre(dinny)\nMucky(dinny)\nOafish(dinny)\nSplendid(shandee)\nnot Mucky(shandee)\nSplendid(emlynne)\nPtolemaic(emlynne)\nOafish(emlynne)\nSplendid(gennie)\nOchre(gennie)\nRewardful(gennie)\nReposeful(gennie)\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Oafish(x))\nReposeful(dinny) -> Splendid(dinny)\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Rewardful(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Ochre(x))\nforall x (Mucky(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nnot Splendid(gennie) -> not Ochre(gennie)\nforall x (Ochre(x) and Rewardful(x) -> not Ptolemaic(x))\nMucky(shandee) and not Reposeful(shandee) -> not Oafish(shandee)\n\nnot Ptolemaic(dinny)\n\nMucky(dinny) and forall x (Mucky(x) -> Reposeful(x)) -> therefore Reposeful(dinny) Reposeful(dinny) and forall x (Reposeful(x) -> Rewardful(x)) -> therefore Rewardful(dinny) Ochre(dinny) and Rewardful(dinny) and forall x (Ochre(x) and Rewardful(x) -> not Ptolemaic(x)) -> therefore not Ptolemaic(dinny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Nathan is rarefied. Nathan is damn. Nathan is unpriestly. Alexandra is suburban. Alexandra is not damn. Dietrich is suburban. Dietrich is blabby. Dietrich is unpriestly. Verina is suburban. Verina is rarefied. Verina is redolent. Verina is fashioned. Red people are unpriestly. If Nathan is fashioned then Nathan is suburban. All fashioned people are redolent. All redolent people are rarefied. If someone is damn then they are fashioned. If Verina is not suburban then Verina is not rarefied. Green, redolent people are not blabby. If Alexandra is damn and Alexandra is not fashioned then Alexandra is not unpriestly. Nathan is blabby.", "logic": "\nRarefied(nathan)\nDamn(nathan)\nUnpriestly(nathan)\nSuburban(alexandra)\nnot Damn(alexandra)\nSuburban(dietrich)\nBlabby(dietrich)\nUnpriestly(dietrich)\nSuburban(verina)\nRarefied(verina)\nRedolent(verina)\nFashioned(verina)\nforall x (Redolent(x) -> Unpriestly(x))\nFashioned(nathan) -> Suburban(nathan)\nforall x (Fashioned(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Redolent(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Damn(x) -> Fashioned(x))\nnot Suburban(verina) -> not Rarefied(verina)\nforall x (Rarefied(x) and Redolent(x) -> not Blabby(x))\nDamn(alexandra) and not Fashioned(alexandra) -> not Unpriestly(alexandra)\n\nBlabby(nathan)\n\nDamn(nathan) and forall x (Damn(x) -> Fashioned(x)) -> therefore Fashioned(nathan) Fashioned(nathan) and forall x (Fashioned(x) -> Redolent(x)) -> therefore Redolent(nathan) Rarefied(nathan) and Redolent(nathan) and forall x (Rarefied(x) and Redolent(x) -> not Blabby(x)) -> therefore not Blabby(nathan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Hasheem is motherlike. Hasheem is mitigatory. Hasheem is pyrogenous. Candice is bipinnate. Candice is not mitigatory. Bessie is bipinnate. Bessie is scandalous. Bessie is pyrogenous. Niccolo is bipinnate. Niccolo is motherlike. Niccolo is chemical. Niccolo is graded. Red people are pyrogenous. If Hasheem is graded then Hasheem is bipinnate. All graded people are chemical. All chemical people are motherlike. If someone is mitigatory then they are graded. If Niccolo is not bipinnate then Niccolo is not motherlike. Green, chemical people are not scandalous. If Candice is mitigatory and Candice is not graded then Candice is not pyrogenous. Candice is not graded.", "logic": "\nMotherlike(hasheem)\nMitigatory(hasheem)\nPyrogenous(hasheem)\nBipinnate(candice)\nnot Mitigatory(candice)\nBipinnate(bessie)\nScandalous(bessie)\nPyrogenous(bessie)\nBipinnate(niccolo)\nMotherlike(niccolo)\nChemical(niccolo)\nGraded(niccolo)\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Pyrogenous(x))\nGraded(hasheem) -> Bipinnate(hasheem)\nforall x (Graded(x) -> Chemical(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Graded(x))\nnot Bipinnate(niccolo) -> not Motherlike(niccolo)\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and Chemical(x) -> not Scandalous(x))\nMitigatory(candice) and not Graded(candice) -> not Pyrogenous(candice)\n\nnot Graded(candice)\n\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Graded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Tamara is faithful. Tamara is botulinal. Tamara is dwarfish. Christean is submissive. Christean is not botulinal. Eileen is submissive. Eileen is voluminous. Eileen is dwarfish. Livia is submissive. Livia is faithful. Livia is marshy. Livia is rostrate. Red people are dwarfish. If Tamara is rostrate then Tamara is submissive. All rostrate people are marshy. All marshy people are faithful. If someone is botulinal then they are rostrate. If Livia is not submissive then Livia is not faithful. Green, marshy people are not voluminous. If Christean is botulinal and Christean is not rostrate then Christean is not dwarfish. Eileen is faithful.", "logic": "\nFaithful(tamara)\nBotulinal(tamara)\nDwarfish(tamara)\nSubmissive(christean)\nnot Botulinal(christean)\nSubmissive(eileen)\nVoluminous(eileen)\nDwarfish(eileen)\nSubmissive(livia)\nFaithful(livia)\nMarshy(livia)\nRostrate(livia)\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Dwarfish(x))\nRostrate(tamara) -> Submissive(tamara)\nforall x (Rostrate(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Faithful(x))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Rostrate(x))\nnot Submissive(livia) -> not Faithful(livia)\nforall x (Faithful(x) and Marshy(x) -> not Voluminous(x))\nBotulinal(christean) and not Rostrate(christean) -> not Dwarfish(christean)\n\nFaithful(eileen)\n\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Faithful(x)) <- forall x (Rostrate(x) -> Marshy(x)) <- forall x (Botulinal(x) -> Rostrate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Rosie is limitless. Rosie is vocalic. Rosie is flexuous. Marillin is eutherian. Marillin is not vocalic. Ronen is eutherian. Ronen is crapulous. Ronen is flexuous. Spiros is eutherian. Spiros is limitless. Spiros is polyvalent. Spiros is rueful. Red people are flexuous. If Rosie is rueful then Rosie is eutherian. All rueful people are polyvalent. All polyvalent people are limitless. If someone is vocalic then they are rueful. If Spiros is not eutherian then Spiros is not limitless. Green, polyvalent people are not crapulous. If Marillin is vocalic and Marillin is not rueful then Marillin is not flexuous. Marillin is not polyvalent.", "logic": "\nLimitless(rosie)\nVocalic(rosie)\nFlexuous(rosie)\nEutherian(marillin)\nnot Vocalic(marillin)\nEutherian(ronen)\nCrapulous(ronen)\nFlexuous(ronen)\nEutherian(spiros)\nLimitless(spiros)\nPolyvalent(spiros)\nRueful(spiros)\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Flexuous(x))\nRueful(rosie) -> Eutherian(rosie)\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Polyvalent(x))\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Limitless(x))\nforall x (Vocalic(x) -> Rueful(x))\nnot Eutherian(spiros) -> not Limitless(spiros)\nforall x (Limitless(x) and Polyvalent(x) -> not Crapulous(x))\nVocalic(marillin) and not Rueful(marillin) -> not Flexuous(marillin)\n\nnot Polyvalent(marillin)\n\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Polyvalent(x)) <- forall x (Vocalic(x) -> Rueful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Kalli is melted. Kalli is bespoken. Kalli is dispirited. Charleen is cheap. Charleen is not bespoken. Damara is cheap. Damara is clouded. Damara is dispirited. Gilberte is cheap. Gilberte is melted. Gilberte is outre. Gilberte is instant. Red people are dispirited. If Kalli is instant then Kalli is cheap. All instant people are outre. All outre people are melted. If someone is bespoken then they are instant. If Gilberte is not cheap then Gilberte is not melted. Green, outre people are not clouded. If Charleen is bespoken and Charleen is not instant then Charleen is not dispirited. Damara is outre.", "logic": "\nMelted(kalli)\nBespoken(kalli)\nDispirited(kalli)\nCheap(charleen)\nnot Bespoken(charleen)\nCheap(damara)\nClouded(damara)\nDispirited(damara)\nCheap(gilberte)\nMelted(gilberte)\nOutre(gilberte)\nInstant(gilberte)\nforall x (Outre(x) -> Dispirited(x))\nInstant(kalli) -> Cheap(kalli)\nforall x (Instant(x) -> Outre(x))\nforall x (Outre(x) -> Melted(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Instant(x))\nnot Cheap(gilberte) -> not Melted(gilberte)\nforall x (Melted(x) and Outre(x) -> not Clouded(x))\nBespoken(charleen) and not Instant(charleen) -> not Dispirited(charleen)\n\nOutre(damara)\n\nforall x (Instant(x) -> Outre(x)) <- forall x (Bespoken(x) -> Instant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Lolande is perverted. Lolande is methodist. Lolande is disastrous. Mariette is austrian. Mariette is not methodist. Vilma is austrian. Vilma is sodding. Vilma is disastrous. Hermia is austrian. Hermia is perverted. Hermia is arawakan. Hermia is papistical. Red people are disastrous. If Lolande is papistical then Lolande is austrian. All papistical people are arawakan. All arawakan people are perverted. If someone is methodist then they are papistical. If Hermia is not austrian then Hermia is not perverted. Green, arawakan people are not sodding. If Mariette is methodist and Mariette is not papistical then Mariette is not disastrous. Hermia is not methodist.", "logic": "\nPerverted(lolande)\nMethodist(lolande)\nDisastrous(lolande)\nAustrian(mariette)\nnot Methodist(mariette)\nAustrian(vilma)\nSodding(vilma)\nDisastrous(vilma)\nAustrian(hermia)\nPerverted(hermia)\nArawakan(hermia)\nPapistical(hermia)\nforall x (Arawakan(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nPapistical(lolande) -> Austrian(lolande)\nforall x (Papistical(x) -> Arawakan(x))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) -> Perverted(x))\nforall x (Methodist(x) -> Papistical(x))\nnot Austrian(hermia) -> not Perverted(hermia)\nforall x (Perverted(x) and Arawakan(x) -> not Sodding(x))\nMethodist(mariette) and not Papistical(mariette) -> not Disastrous(mariette)\n\nnot Methodist(hermia)\n\nnot Methodist(hermia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Dyann is reflexive. Dyann is hindmost. Dyann is bodily. Hartley is raging. Hartley is not hindmost. Gregg is raging. Gregg is querulous. Gregg is bodily. Camile is raging. Camile is reflexive. Camile is elflike. Camile is shingly. Red people are bodily. If Dyann is shingly then Dyann is raging. All shingly people are elflike. All elflike people are reflexive. If someone is hindmost then they are shingly. If Camile is not raging then Camile is not reflexive. Green, elflike people are not querulous. If Hartley is hindmost and Hartley is not shingly then Hartley is not bodily. Hartley is querulous.", "logic": "\nReflexive(dyann)\nHindmost(dyann)\nBodily(dyann)\nRaging(hartley)\nnot Hindmost(hartley)\nRaging(gregg)\nQuerulous(gregg)\nBodily(gregg)\nRaging(camile)\nReflexive(camile)\nElflike(camile)\nShingly(camile)\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Bodily(x))\nShingly(dyann) -> Raging(dyann)\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Elflike(x))\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Reflexive(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) -> Shingly(x))\nnot Raging(camile) -> not Reflexive(camile)\nforall x (Reflexive(x) and Elflike(x) -> not Querulous(x))\nHindmost(hartley) and not Shingly(hartley) -> not Bodily(hartley)\n\nQuerulous(hartley)\n\nQuerulous(hartley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Hadria is corinthian. Hadria is not basic. Hadria is scabrous. Hadria is spunky. Sandi is racking. Sandi is scabrous. Sandi is spunky. Rough people are basic. All mongol people are scabrous. All downright people are scabrous. If Sandi is scabrous and Sandi is basic then Sandi is not downright. If Hadria is downright then Hadria is corinthian. If someone is corinthian then they are spunky. Rough people are spunky. If someone is racking and not downright then they are corinthian. Hadria is corinthian.", "logic": "\nCorinthian(hadria)\nnot Basic(hadria)\nScabrous(hadria)\nSpunky(hadria)\nRacking(sandi)\nScabrous(sandi)\nSpunky(sandi)\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Basic(x))\nforall x (Mongol(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Downright(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nScabrous(sandi) and Basic(sandi) -> not Downright(sandi)\nDownright(hadria) -> Corinthian(hadria)\nforall x (Corinthian(x) -> Spunky(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Spunky(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) and not Downright(x) -> Corinthian(x))\n\nCorinthian(hadria)\n\ntherefore Corinthian(hadria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Sayer is raunchy. Sayer is not redeeming. Sayer is sadducean. Sayer is spongy. Carlotta is yelled. Carlotta is sadducean. Carlotta is spongy. Rough people are redeeming. All carven people are sadducean. All spayed people are sadducean. If Carlotta is sadducean and Carlotta is redeeming then Carlotta is not spayed. If Sayer is spayed then Sayer is raunchy. If someone is raunchy then they are spongy. Rough people are spongy. If someone is yelled and not spayed then they are raunchy. Sayer is not sadducean.", "logic": "\nRaunchy(sayer)\nnot Redeeming(sayer)\nSadducean(sayer)\nSpongy(sayer)\nYelled(carlotta)\nSadducean(carlotta)\nSpongy(carlotta)\nforall x (Yelled(x) -> Redeeming(x))\nforall x (Carven(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Spayed(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nSadducean(carlotta) and Redeeming(carlotta) -> not Spayed(carlotta)\nSpayed(sayer) -> Raunchy(sayer)\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Yelled(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Yelled(x) and not Spayed(x) -> Raunchy(x))\n\nnot Sadducean(sayer)\n\ntherefore Sadducean(sayer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Amelina is nonmusical. Amelina is not unuttered. Amelina is tutorial. Amelina is ignoble. Marj is macedonian. Marj is tutorial. Marj is ignoble. Rough people are unuttered. All fragile people are tutorial. All brinded people are tutorial. If Marj is tutorial and Marj is unuttered then Marj is not brinded. If Amelina is brinded then Amelina is nonmusical. If someone is nonmusical then they are ignoble. Rough people are ignoble. If someone is macedonian and not brinded then they are nonmusical. Marj is unuttered.", "logic": "\nNonmusical(amelina)\nnot Unuttered(amelina)\nTutorial(amelina)\nIgnoble(amelina)\nMacedonian(marj)\nTutorial(marj)\nIgnoble(marj)\nforall x (Macedonian(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Fragile(x) -> Tutorial(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Tutorial(x))\nTutorial(marj) and Unuttered(marj) -> not Brinded(marj)\nBrinded(amelina) -> Nonmusical(amelina)\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) -> Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Macedonian(x) -> Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Macedonian(x) and not Brinded(x) -> Nonmusical(x))\n\nUnuttered(marj)\n\nMacedonian(marj) and forall x (Macedonian(x) -> Unuttered(x)) -> therefore Unuttered(marj)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Eleni is captious. Eleni is not umpteen. Eleni is unabated. Eleni is climatic. Damaris is intolerant. Damaris is unabated. Damaris is climatic. Rough people are umpteen. All alkylic people are unabated. All adverse people are unabated. If Damaris is unabated and Damaris is umpteen then Damaris is not adverse. If Eleni is adverse then Eleni is captious. If someone is captious then they are climatic. Rough people are climatic. If someone is intolerant and not adverse then they are captious. Damaris is not umpteen.", "logic": "\nCaptious(eleni)\nnot Umpteen(eleni)\nUnabated(eleni)\nClimatic(eleni)\nIntolerant(damaris)\nUnabated(damaris)\nClimatic(damaris)\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) -> Unabated(x))\nUnabated(damaris) and Umpteen(damaris) -> not Adverse(damaris)\nAdverse(eleni) -> Captious(eleni)\nforall x (Captious(x) -> Climatic(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Climatic(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) and not Adverse(x) -> Captious(x))\n\nnot Umpteen(damaris)\n\nIntolerant(damaris) and forall x (Intolerant(x) -> Umpteen(x)) -> therefore Umpteen(damaris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Faina is aetiologic. Faina is not ruled. Faina is amniotic. Faina is pugilistic. Daphene is bedewed. Daphene is amniotic. Daphene is pugilistic. Rough people are ruled. All rustic people are amniotic. All lithesome people are amniotic. If Daphene is amniotic and Daphene is ruled then Daphene is not lithesome. If Faina is lithesome then Faina is aetiologic. If someone is aetiologic then they are pugilistic. Rough people are pugilistic. If someone is bedewed and not lithesome then they are aetiologic. Daphene is not lithesome.", "logic": "\nAetiologic(faina)\nnot Ruled(faina)\nAmniotic(faina)\nPugilistic(faina)\nBedewed(daphene)\nAmniotic(daphene)\nPugilistic(daphene)\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Ruled(x))\nforall x (Rustic(x) -> Amniotic(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> Amniotic(x))\nAmniotic(daphene) and Ruled(daphene) -> not Lithesome(daphene)\nLithesome(faina) -> Aetiologic(faina)\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) and not Lithesome(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\n\nnot Lithesome(daphene)\n\nBedewed(daphene) and forall x (Bedewed(x) -> Ruled(x)) -> therefore Ruled(daphene) Amniotic(daphene) and Ruled(daphene) and Amniotic(daphene) and Ruled(daphene) -> not Lithesome(daphene) -> therefore not Lithesome(daphene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Derk is miscible. Derk is not prudential. Derk is lacking. Derk is myelic. Frederica is leprose. Frederica is lacking. Frederica is myelic. Rough people are prudential. All travelable people are lacking. All carved people are lacking. If Frederica is lacking and Frederica is prudential then Frederica is not carved. If Derk is carved then Derk is miscible. If someone is miscible then they are myelic. Rough people are myelic. If someone is leprose and not carved then they are miscible. Frederica is carved.", "logic": "\nMiscible(derk)\nnot Prudential(derk)\nLacking(derk)\nMyelic(derk)\nLeprose(frederica)\nLacking(frederica)\nMyelic(frederica)\nforall x (Leprose(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Travelable(x) -> Lacking(x))\nforall x (Carved(x) -> Lacking(x))\nLacking(frederica) and Prudential(frederica) -> not Carved(frederica)\nCarved(derk) -> Miscible(derk)\nforall x (Miscible(x) -> Myelic(x))\nforall x (Leprose(x) -> Myelic(x))\nforall x (Leprose(x) and not Carved(x) -> Miscible(x))\n\nCarved(frederica)\n\nLeprose(frederica) and forall x (Leprose(x) -> Prudential(x)) -> therefore Prudential(frederica) Lacking(frederica) and Prudential(frederica) and Lacking(frederica) and Prudential(frederica) -> not Carved(frederica) -> therefore not Carved(frederica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Calli is errhine. Calli is not andalusian. Calli is downward. Calli is ornery. Gelya is tsaristic. Gelya is downward. Gelya is ornery. Rough people are andalusian. All anarchic people are downward. All keynesian people are downward. If Gelya is downward and Gelya is andalusian then Gelya is not keynesian. If Calli is keynesian then Calli is errhine. If someone is errhine then they are ornery. Rough people are ornery. If someone is tsaristic and not keynesian then they are errhine. Gelya is errhine.", "logic": "\nErrhine(calli)\nnot Andalusian(calli)\nDownward(calli)\nOrnery(calli)\nTsaristic(gelya)\nDownward(gelya)\nOrnery(gelya)\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Downward(x))\nforall x (Keynesian(x) -> Downward(x))\nDownward(gelya) and Andalusian(gelya) -> not Keynesian(gelya)\nKeynesian(calli) -> Errhine(calli)\nforall x (Errhine(x) -> Ornery(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Ornery(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and not Keynesian(x) -> Errhine(x))\n\nErrhine(gelya)\n\nTsaristic(gelya) and forall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Andalusian(x)) -> therefore Andalusian(gelya) Downward(gelya) and Andalusian(gelya) and Downward(gelya) and Andalusian(gelya) -> not Keynesian(gelya) -> therefore not Keynesian(gelya) Tsaristic(gelya) and not Keynesian(gelya) and forall x (Tsaristic(x) and not Keynesian(x) -> Errhine(x)) -> therefore Errhine(gelya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Leese is resiny. Leese is not overstrung. Leese is motor. Leese is hornless. Hillery is inebriated. Hillery is motor. Hillery is hornless. Rough people are overstrung. All azido people are motor. All uninsured people are motor. If Hillery is motor and Hillery is overstrung then Hillery is not uninsured. If Leese is uninsured then Leese is resiny. If someone is resiny then they are hornless. Rough people are hornless. If someone is inebriated and not uninsured then they are resiny. Hillery is not resiny.", "logic": "\nResiny(leese)\nnot Overstrung(leese)\nMotor(leese)\nHornless(leese)\nInebriated(hillery)\nMotor(hillery)\nHornless(hillery)\nforall x (Inebriated(x) -> Overstrung(x))\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Uninsured(x) -> Motor(x))\nMotor(hillery) and Overstrung(hillery) -> not Uninsured(hillery)\nUninsured(leese) -> Resiny(leese)\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Inebriated(x) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Inebriated(x) and not Uninsured(x) -> Resiny(x))\n\nnot Resiny(hillery)\n\nInebriated(hillery) and forall x (Inebriated(x) -> Overstrung(x)) -> therefore Overstrung(hillery) Motor(hillery) and Overstrung(hillery) and Motor(hillery) and Overstrung(hillery) -> not Uninsured(hillery) -> therefore not Uninsured(hillery) Inebriated(hillery) and not Uninsured(hillery) and forall x (Inebriated(x) and not Uninsured(x) -> Resiny(x)) -> therefore Resiny(hillery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Lydia is antitrust. Lydia is not eellike. Lydia is donatist. Lydia is formidable. Daisi is protrusile. Daisi is donatist. Daisi is formidable. Rough people are eellike. All modernized people are donatist. All pleasant people are donatist. If Daisi is donatist and Daisi is eellike then Daisi is not pleasant. If Lydia is pleasant then Lydia is antitrust. If someone is antitrust then they are formidable. Rough people are formidable. If someone is protrusile and not pleasant then they are antitrust. Lydia is not pleasant.", "logic": "\nAntitrust(lydia)\nnot Eellike(lydia)\nDonatist(lydia)\nFormidable(lydia)\nProtrusile(daisi)\nDonatist(daisi)\nFormidable(daisi)\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Donatist(x))\nforall x (Pleasant(x) -> Donatist(x))\nDonatist(daisi) and Eellike(daisi) -> not Pleasant(daisi)\nPleasant(lydia) -> Antitrust(lydia)\nforall x (Antitrust(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) and not Pleasant(x) -> Antitrust(x))\n\nnot Pleasant(lydia)\n\nnot Pleasant(lydia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Linn is endermatic. Linn is not postexilic. Linn is unforced. Linn is menial. Albatros is vinaceous. Albatros is unforced. Albatros is menial. Rough people are postexilic. All acanthous people are unforced. All evaluative people are unforced. If Albatros is unforced and Albatros is postexilic then Albatros is not evaluative. If Linn is evaluative then Linn is endermatic. If someone is endermatic then they are menial. Rough people are menial. If someone is vinaceous and not evaluative then they are endermatic. Linn is acanthous.", "logic": "\nEndermatic(linn)\nnot Postexilic(linn)\nUnforced(linn)\nMenial(linn)\nVinaceous(albatros)\nUnforced(albatros)\nMenial(albatros)\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Postexilic(x))\nforall x (Acanthous(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Unforced(x))\nUnforced(albatros) and Postexilic(albatros) -> not Evaluative(albatros)\nEvaluative(linn) -> Endermatic(linn)\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Menial(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Menial(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) and not Evaluative(x) -> Endermatic(x))\n\nAcanthous(linn)\n\nAcanthous(linn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Samuela is unrealised. Samuela is not believable. Samuela is leavened. Samuela is uncrossed. Priscilla is shared. Priscilla is leavened. Priscilla is uncrossed. Rough people are believable. All denotive people are leavened. All haploidic people are leavened. If Priscilla is leavened and Priscilla is believable then Priscilla is not haploidic. If Samuela is haploidic then Samuela is unrealised. If someone is unrealised then they are uncrossed. Rough people are uncrossed. If someone is shared and not haploidic then they are unrealised. Priscilla is not denotive.", "logic": "\nUnrealised(samuela)\nnot Believable(samuela)\nLeavened(samuela)\nUncrossed(samuela)\nShared(priscilla)\nLeavened(priscilla)\nUncrossed(priscilla)\nforall x (Shared(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) -> Leavened(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Leavened(x))\nLeavened(priscilla) and Believable(priscilla) -> not Haploidic(priscilla)\nHaploidic(samuela) -> Unrealised(samuela)\nforall x (Unrealised(x) -> Uncrossed(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) -> Uncrossed(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) and not Haploidic(x) -> Unrealised(x))\n\nnot Denotive(priscilla)\n\nnot Denotive(priscilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Merralee is sunstruck. Merralee is not parotid. Merralee is petrous. Merralee is unsoluble. Olivia is suicidal. Olivia is petrous. Olivia is unsoluble. Rough people are parotid. All documental people are petrous. All uniformed people are petrous. If Olivia is petrous and Olivia is parotid then Olivia is not uniformed. If Merralee is uniformed then Merralee is sunstruck. If someone is sunstruck then they are unsoluble. Rough people are unsoluble. If someone is suicidal and not uniformed then they are sunstruck. Merralee is suicidal.", "logic": "\nSunstruck(merralee)\nnot Parotid(merralee)\nPetrous(merralee)\nUnsoluble(merralee)\nSuicidal(olivia)\nPetrous(olivia)\nUnsoluble(olivia)\nforall x (Suicidal(x) -> Parotid(x))\nforall x (Documental(x) -> Petrous(x))\nforall x (Uniformed(x) -> Petrous(x))\nPetrous(olivia) and Parotid(olivia) -> not Uniformed(olivia)\nUniformed(merralee) -> Sunstruck(merralee)\nforall x (Sunstruck(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) and not Uniformed(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\n\nSuicidal(merralee)\n\nSuicidal(merralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "The danit is noncrucial. The danit instance the rhonda. The danit blister the jennette. The danit blister the rhonda. The jennette relyric the danit. The jennette is robotlike. The jennette is proven. The jennette is bigheaded. The jennette is becalmed. The jennette instance the danit. The jennette instance the rhonda. The jennette blister the danit. The jennette blister the rhonda. The rhonda relyric the danit. The rhonda relyric the jennette. The rhonda instance the danit. If someone instance the danit then they see the danit. If someone relyric the danit and they are bigheaded then the danit is robotlike. If someone instance the danit and the danit relyric the rhonda then the rhonda blister the jennette. If someone relyric the rhonda then the rhonda is noncrucial. If the danit blister the rhonda then the rhonda relyric the jennette. If someone is bigheaded then they see the rhonda. If the jennette blister the rhonda then the jennette blister the danit. If someone is robotlike then they eat the rhonda. The jennette instance the danit.", "logic": "\nNoncrucial(danit)\nInstance(danit, rhonda)\nBlister(danit, jennette)\nBlister(danit, rhonda)\nRelyric(jennette, danit)\nRobotlike(jennette)\nProven(jennette)\nBigheaded(jennette)\nBecalmed(jennette)\nInstance(jennette, danit)\nInstance(jennette, rhonda)\nBlister(jennette, danit)\nBlister(jennette, rhonda)\nRelyric(rhonda, danit)\nRelyric(rhonda, jennette)\nInstance(rhonda, danit)\nforall x (Instance(x, danit) -> Blister(x, danit))\nforall x (Relyric(x, danit) and Bigheaded(x) -> Robotlike(danit))\nforall x (Instance(x, danit) and Relyric(danit, rhonda) -> Blister(rhonda, jennette))\nforall x (Relyric(x, rhonda) -> Noncrucial(rhonda))\nBlister(danit, rhonda) -> Relyric(rhonda, jennette)\nforall x (Bigheaded(x) -> Blister(x, rhonda))\nBlister(jennette, rhonda) -> Blister(jennette, danit)\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Relyric(x, rhonda))\n\nInstance(jennette, danit)\n\ntherefore Instance(jennette, danit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The barbe is carbonous. The barbe exempt the oscar. The barbe conjecture the orsa. The barbe conjecture the oscar. The orsa ticktock the barbe. The orsa is ubiquitous. The orsa is lenten. The orsa is unordered. The orsa is immortal. The orsa exempt the barbe. The orsa exempt the oscar. The orsa conjecture the barbe. The orsa conjecture the oscar. The oscar ticktock the barbe. The oscar ticktock the orsa. The oscar exempt the barbe. If someone exempt the barbe then they see the barbe. If someone ticktock the barbe and they are unordered then the barbe is ubiquitous. If someone exempt the barbe and the barbe ticktock the oscar then the oscar conjecture the orsa. If someone ticktock the oscar then the oscar is carbonous. If the barbe conjecture the oscar then the oscar ticktock the orsa. If someone is unordered then they see the oscar. If the orsa conjecture the oscar then the orsa conjecture the barbe. If someone is ubiquitous then they eat the oscar. The oscar does not eat the orsa.", "logic": "\nCarbonous(barbe)\nExempt(barbe, oscar)\nConjecture(barbe, orsa)\nConjecture(barbe, oscar)\nTicktock(orsa, barbe)\nUbiquitous(orsa)\nLenten(orsa)\nUnordered(orsa)\nImmortal(orsa)\nExempt(orsa, barbe)\nExempt(orsa, oscar)\nConjecture(orsa, barbe)\nConjecture(orsa, oscar)\nTicktock(oscar, barbe)\nTicktock(oscar, orsa)\nExempt(oscar, barbe)\nforall x (Exempt(x, barbe) -> Conjecture(x, barbe))\nforall x (Ticktock(x, barbe) and Unordered(x) -> Ubiquitous(barbe))\nforall x (Exempt(x, barbe) and Ticktock(barbe, oscar) -> Conjecture(oscar, orsa))\nforall x (Ticktock(x, oscar) -> Carbonous(oscar))\nConjecture(barbe, oscar) -> Ticktock(oscar, orsa)\nforall x (Unordered(x) -> Conjecture(x, oscar))\nConjecture(orsa, oscar) -> Conjecture(orsa, barbe)\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> Ticktock(x, oscar))\n\nnot Ticktock(oscar, orsa)\n\ntherefore Ticktock(oscar, orsa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The gretta is expiratory. The gretta load the troy. The gretta loop the gerrie. The gretta loop the troy. The gerrie quail the gretta. The gerrie is foolproof. The gerrie is none. The gerrie is periodical. The gerrie is unlearned. The gerrie load the gretta. The gerrie load the troy. The gerrie loop the gretta. The gerrie loop the troy. The troy quail the gretta. The troy quail the gerrie. The troy load the gretta. If someone load the gretta then they see the gretta. If someone quail the gretta and they are periodical then the gretta is foolproof. If someone load the gretta and the gretta quail the troy then the troy loop the gerrie. If someone quail the troy then the troy is expiratory. If the gretta loop the troy then the troy quail the gerrie. If someone is periodical then they see the troy. If the gerrie loop the troy then the gerrie loop the gretta. If someone is foolproof then they eat the troy. The troy loop the gretta.", "logic": "\nExpiratory(gretta)\nLoad(gretta, troy)\nLoop(gretta, gerrie)\nLoop(gretta, troy)\nQuail(gerrie, gretta)\nFoolproof(gerrie)\nNone(gerrie)\nPeriodical(gerrie)\nUnlearned(gerrie)\nLoad(gerrie, gretta)\nLoad(gerrie, troy)\nLoop(gerrie, gretta)\nLoop(gerrie, troy)\nQuail(troy, gretta)\nQuail(troy, gerrie)\nLoad(troy, gretta)\nforall x (Load(x, gretta) -> Loop(x, gretta))\nforall x (Quail(x, gretta) and Periodical(x) -> Foolproof(gretta))\nforall x (Load(x, gretta) and Quail(gretta, troy) -> Loop(troy, gerrie))\nforall x (Quail(x, troy) -> Expiratory(troy))\nLoop(gretta, troy) -> Quail(troy, gerrie)\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Loop(x, troy))\nLoop(gerrie, troy) -> Loop(gerrie, gretta)\nforall x (Foolproof(x) -> Quail(x, troy))\n\nLoop(troy, gretta)\n\nLoad(troy, gretta) and forall x (Load(x, gretta) -> Loop(x, gretta)) -> therefore Loop(troy, gretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The stevena is indulgent. The stevena undersell the silvia. The stevena assent the wilfred. The stevena assent the silvia. The wilfred pivot the stevena. The wilfred is argent. The wilfred is mimic. The wilfred is speedy. The wilfred is canned. The wilfred undersell the stevena. The wilfred undersell the silvia. The wilfred assent the stevena. The wilfred assent the silvia. The silvia pivot the stevena. The silvia pivot the wilfred. The silvia undersell the stevena. If someone undersell the stevena then they see the stevena. If someone pivot the stevena and they are speedy then the stevena is argent. If someone undersell the stevena and the stevena pivot the silvia then the silvia assent the wilfred. If someone pivot the silvia then the silvia is indulgent. If the stevena assent the silvia then the silvia pivot the wilfred. If someone is speedy then they see the silvia. If the wilfred assent the silvia then the wilfred assent the stevena. If someone is argent then they eat the silvia. The silvia does not see the stevena.", "logic": "\nIndulgent(stevena)\nUndersell(stevena, silvia)\nAssent(stevena, wilfred)\nAssent(stevena, silvia)\nPivot(wilfred, stevena)\nArgent(wilfred)\nMimic(wilfred)\nSpeedy(wilfred)\nCanned(wilfred)\nUndersell(wilfred, stevena)\nUndersell(wilfred, silvia)\nAssent(wilfred, stevena)\nAssent(wilfred, silvia)\nPivot(silvia, stevena)\nPivot(silvia, wilfred)\nUndersell(silvia, stevena)\nforall x (Undersell(x, stevena) -> Assent(x, stevena))\nforall x (Pivot(x, stevena) and Speedy(x) -> Argent(stevena))\nforall x (Undersell(x, stevena) and Pivot(stevena, silvia) -> Assent(silvia, wilfred))\nforall x (Pivot(x, silvia) -> Indulgent(silvia))\nAssent(stevena, silvia) -> Pivot(silvia, wilfred)\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Assent(x, silvia))\nAssent(wilfred, silvia) -> Assent(wilfred, stevena)\nforall x (Argent(x) -> Pivot(x, silvia))\n\nnot Assent(silvia, stevena)\n\nUndersell(silvia, stevena) and forall x (Undersell(x, stevena) -> Assent(x, stevena)) -> therefore Assent(silvia, stevena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The agamemnon is scurrying. The agamemnon notarize the merv. The agamemnon deforest the jyoti. The agamemnon deforest the merv. The jyoti slaver the agamemnon. The jyoti is excusatory. The jyoti is alphabetic. The jyoti is draggled. The jyoti is skyward. The jyoti notarize the agamemnon. The jyoti notarize the merv. The jyoti deforest the agamemnon. The jyoti deforest the merv. The merv slaver the agamemnon. The merv slaver the jyoti. The merv notarize the agamemnon. If someone notarize the agamemnon then they see the agamemnon. If someone slaver the agamemnon and they are draggled then the agamemnon is excusatory. If someone notarize the agamemnon and the agamemnon slaver the merv then the merv deforest the jyoti. If someone slaver the merv then the merv is scurrying. If the agamemnon deforest the merv then the merv slaver the jyoti. If someone is draggled then they see the merv. If the jyoti deforest the merv then the jyoti deforest the agamemnon. If someone is excusatory then they eat the merv. The merv is scurrying.", "logic": "\nScurrying(agamemnon)\nNotarize(agamemnon, merv)\nDeforest(agamemnon, jyoti)\nDeforest(agamemnon, merv)\nSlaver(jyoti, agamemnon)\nExcusatory(jyoti)\nAlphabetic(jyoti)\nDraggled(jyoti)\nSkyward(jyoti)\nNotarize(jyoti, agamemnon)\nNotarize(jyoti, merv)\nDeforest(jyoti, agamemnon)\nDeforest(jyoti, merv)\nSlaver(merv, agamemnon)\nSlaver(merv, jyoti)\nNotarize(merv, agamemnon)\nforall x (Notarize(x, agamemnon) -> Deforest(x, agamemnon))\nforall x (Slaver(x, agamemnon) and Draggled(x) -> Excusatory(agamemnon))\nforall x (Notarize(x, agamemnon) and Slaver(agamemnon, merv) -> Deforest(merv, jyoti))\nforall x (Slaver(x, merv) -> Scurrying(merv))\nDeforest(agamemnon, merv) -> Slaver(merv, jyoti)\nforall x (Draggled(x) -> Deforest(x, merv))\nDeforest(jyoti, merv) -> Deforest(jyoti, agamemnon)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Slaver(x, merv))\n\nScurrying(merv)\n\nExcusatory(jyoti) and forall x (Excusatory(x) -> Slaver(x, merv)) -> therefore Slaver(jyoti, merv) Slaver(jyoti, merv) and forall x (Slaver(x, merv) -> Scurrying(merv)) -> therefore Scurrying(merv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The hattie is bendable. The hattie kennel the clarence. The hattie mutilate the fifi. The hattie mutilate the clarence. The fifi general the hattie. The fifi is rousseauan. The fifi is cyanogenic. The fifi is downcast. The fifi is sallow. The fifi kennel the hattie. The fifi kennel the clarence. The fifi mutilate the hattie. The fifi mutilate the clarence. The clarence general the hattie. The clarence general the fifi. The clarence kennel the hattie. If someone kennel the hattie then they see the hattie. If someone general the hattie and they are downcast then the hattie is rousseauan. If someone kennel the hattie and the hattie general the clarence then the clarence mutilate the fifi. If someone general the clarence then the clarence is bendable. If the hattie mutilate the clarence then the clarence general the fifi. If someone is downcast then they see the clarence. If the fifi mutilate the clarence then the fifi mutilate the hattie. If someone is rousseauan then they eat the clarence. The hattie does not eat the clarence.", "logic": "\nBendable(hattie)\nKennel(hattie, clarence)\nMutilate(hattie, fifi)\nMutilate(hattie, clarence)\nGeneral(fifi, hattie)\nRousseauan(fifi)\nCyanogenic(fifi)\nDowncast(fifi)\nSallow(fifi)\nKennel(fifi, hattie)\nKennel(fifi, clarence)\nMutilate(fifi, hattie)\nMutilate(fifi, clarence)\nGeneral(clarence, hattie)\nGeneral(clarence, fifi)\nKennel(clarence, hattie)\nforall x (Kennel(x, hattie) -> Mutilate(x, hattie))\nforall x (General(x, hattie) and Downcast(x) -> Rousseauan(hattie))\nforall x (Kennel(x, hattie) and General(hattie, clarence) -> Mutilate(clarence, fifi))\nforall x (General(x, clarence) -> Bendable(clarence))\nMutilate(hattie, clarence) -> General(clarence, fifi)\nforall x (Downcast(x) -> Mutilate(x, clarence))\nMutilate(fifi, clarence) -> Mutilate(fifi, hattie)\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> General(x, clarence))\n\nnot General(hattie, clarence)\n\nGeneral(fifi, hattie) and Downcast(fifi) and forall x (General(x, hattie) and Downcast(x) -> Rousseauan(hattie)) -> therefore Rousseauan(hattie) Rousseauan(hattie) and forall x (Rousseauan(x) -> General(x, clarence)) -> therefore General(hattie, clarence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The gilberto is puzzled. The gilberto actualize the merl. The gilberto fillet the ara. The gilberto fillet the merl. The ara checker the gilberto. The ara is nonopening. The ara is chemic. The ara is lunatic. The ara is foliolate. The ara actualize the gilberto. The ara actualize the merl. The ara fillet the gilberto. The ara fillet the merl. The merl checker the gilberto. The merl checker the ara. The merl actualize the gilberto. If someone actualize the gilberto then they see the gilberto. If someone checker the gilberto and they are lunatic then the gilberto is nonopening. If someone actualize the gilberto and the gilberto checker the merl then the merl fillet the ara. If someone checker the merl then the merl is puzzled. If the gilberto fillet the merl then the merl checker the ara. If someone is lunatic then they see the merl. If the ara fillet the merl then the ara fillet the gilberto. If someone is nonopening then they eat the merl. The merl fillet the ara.", "logic": "\nPuzzled(gilberto)\nActualize(gilberto, merl)\nFillet(gilberto, ara)\nFillet(gilberto, merl)\nChecker(ara, gilberto)\nNonopening(ara)\nChemic(ara)\nLunatic(ara)\nFoliolate(ara)\nActualize(ara, gilberto)\nActualize(ara, merl)\nFillet(ara, gilberto)\nFillet(ara, merl)\nChecker(merl, gilberto)\nChecker(merl, ara)\nActualize(merl, gilberto)\nforall x (Actualize(x, gilberto) -> Fillet(x, gilberto))\nforall x (Checker(x, gilberto) and Lunatic(x) -> Nonopening(gilberto))\nforall x (Actualize(x, gilberto) and Checker(gilberto, merl) -> Fillet(merl, ara))\nforall x (Checker(x, merl) -> Puzzled(merl))\nFillet(gilberto, merl) -> Checker(merl, ara)\nforall x (Lunatic(x) -> Fillet(x, merl))\nFillet(ara, merl) -> Fillet(ara, gilberto)\nforall x (Nonopening(x) -> Checker(x, merl))\n\nFillet(merl, ara)\n\nChecker(ara, gilberto) and Lunatic(ara) and forall x (Checker(x, gilberto) and Lunatic(x) -> Nonopening(gilberto)) -> therefore Nonopening(gilberto) Nonopening(gilberto) and forall x (Nonopening(x) -> Checker(x, merl)) -> therefore Checker(gilberto, merl) Actualize(ara, gilberto) and Checker(gilberto, merl) and forall x (Actualize(x, gilberto) and Checker(gilberto, merl) -> Fillet(merl, ara)) -> therefore Fillet(merl, ara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The genia is adequate. The genia shove the marjory. The genia stalemate the karlene. The genia stalemate the marjory. The karlene locomote the genia. The karlene is estranged. The karlene is effective. The karlene is extramural. The karlene is clannish. The karlene shove the genia. The karlene shove the marjory. The karlene stalemate the genia. The karlene stalemate the marjory. The marjory locomote the genia. The marjory locomote the karlene. The marjory shove the genia. If someone shove the genia then they see the genia. If someone locomote the genia and they are extramural then the genia is estranged. If someone shove the genia and the genia locomote the marjory then the marjory stalemate the karlene. If someone locomote the marjory then the marjory is adequate. If the genia stalemate the marjory then the marjory locomote the karlene. If someone is extramural then they see the marjory. If the karlene stalemate the marjory then the karlene stalemate the genia. If someone is estranged then they eat the marjory. The marjory does not see the karlene.", "logic": "\nAdequate(genia)\nShove(genia, marjory)\nStalemate(genia, karlene)\nStalemate(genia, marjory)\nLocomote(karlene, genia)\nEstranged(karlene)\nEffective(karlene)\nExtramural(karlene)\nClannish(karlene)\nShove(karlene, genia)\nShove(karlene, marjory)\nStalemate(karlene, genia)\nStalemate(karlene, marjory)\nLocomote(marjory, genia)\nLocomote(marjory, karlene)\nShove(marjory, genia)\nforall x (Shove(x, genia) -> Stalemate(x, genia))\nforall x (Locomote(x, genia) and Extramural(x) -> Estranged(genia))\nforall x (Shove(x, genia) and Locomote(genia, marjory) -> Stalemate(marjory, karlene))\nforall x (Locomote(x, marjory) -> Adequate(marjory))\nStalemate(genia, marjory) -> Locomote(marjory, karlene)\nforall x (Extramural(x) -> Stalemate(x, marjory))\nStalemate(karlene, marjory) -> Stalemate(karlene, genia)\nforall x (Estranged(x) -> Locomote(x, marjory))\n\nnot Stalemate(marjory, karlene)\n\nLocomote(karlene, genia) and Extramural(karlene) and forall x (Locomote(x, genia) and Extramural(x) -> Estranged(genia)) -> therefore Estranged(genia) Estranged(genia) and forall x (Estranged(x) -> Locomote(x, marjory)) -> therefore Locomote(genia, marjory) Shove(karlene, genia) and Locomote(genia, marjory) and forall x (Shove(x, genia) and Locomote(genia, marjory) -> Stalemate(marjory, karlene)) -> therefore Stalemate(marjory, karlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The rosabella is coeliac. The rosabella entomb the crystie. The rosabella peal the victor. The rosabella peal the crystie. The victor humify the rosabella. The victor is unsent. The victor is unemphatic. The victor is aching. The victor is stretchy. The victor entomb the rosabella. The victor entomb the crystie. The victor peal the rosabella. The victor peal the crystie. The crystie humify the rosabella. The crystie humify the victor. The crystie entomb the rosabella. If someone entomb the rosabella then they see the rosabella. If someone humify the rosabella and they are aching then the rosabella is unsent. If someone entomb the rosabella and the rosabella humify the crystie then the crystie peal the victor. If someone humify the crystie then the crystie is coeliac. If the rosabella peal the crystie then the crystie humify the victor. If someone is aching then they see the crystie. If the victor peal the crystie then the victor peal the rosabella. If someone is unsent then they eat the crystie. The crystie does not see the crystie.", "logic": "\nCoeliac(rosabella)\nEntomb(rosabella, crystie)\nPeal(rosabella, victor)\nPeal(rosabella, crystie)\nHumify(victor, rosabella)\nUnsent(victor)\nUnemphatic(victor)\nAching(victor)\nStretchy(victor)\nEntomb(victor, rosabella)\nEntomb(victor, crystie)\nPeal(victor, rosabella)\nPeal(victor, crystie)\nHumify(crystie, rosabella)\nHumify(crystie, victor)\nEntomb(crystie, rosabella)\nforall x (Entomb(x, rosabella) -> Peal(x, rosabella))\nforall x (Humify(x, rosabella) and Aching(x) -> Unsent(rosabella))\nforall x (Entomb(x, rosabella) and Humify(rosabella, crystie) -> Peal(crystie, victor))\nforall x (Humify(x, crystie) -> Coeliac(crystie))\nPeal(rosabella, crystie) -> Humify(crystie, victor)\nforall x (Aching(x) -> Peal(x, crystie))\nPeal(victor, crystie) -> Peal(victor, rosabella)\nforall x (Unsent(x) -> Humify(x, crystie))\n\nnot Peal(crystie, crystie)\n\nforall x (Aching(x) -> Peal(x, crystie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The emera is umteen. The emera dado the deni. The emera oppress the rodge. The emera oppress the deni. The rodge bedew the emera. The rodge is immoveable. The rodge is unmindful. The rodge is mangey. The rodge is animal. The rodge dado the emera. The rodge dado the deni. The rodge oppress the emera. The rodge oppress the deni. The deni bedew the emera. The deni bedew the rodge. The deni dado the emera. If someone dado the emera then they see the emera. If someone bedew the emera and they are mangey then the emera is immoveable. If someone dado the emera and the emera bedew the deni then the deni oppress the rodge. If someone bedew the deni then the deni is umteen. If the emera oppress the deni then the deni bedew the rodge. If someone is mangey then they see the deni. If the rodge oppress the deni then the rodge oppress the emera. If someone is immoveable then they eat the deni. The emera oppress the emera.", "logic": "\nUmteen(emera)\nDado(emera, deni)\nOppress(emera, rodge)\nOppress(emera, deni)\nBedew(rodge, emera)\nImmoveable(rodge)\nUnmindful(rodge)\nMangey(rodge)\nAnimal(rodge)\nDado(rodge, emera)\nDado(rodge, deni)\nOppress(rodge, emera)\nOppress(rodge, deni)\nBedew(deni, emera)\nBedew(deni, rodge)\nDado(deni, emera)\nforall x (Dado(x, emera) -> Oppress(x, emera))\nforall x (Bedew(x, emera) and Mangey(x) -> Immoveable(emera))\nforall x (Dado(x, emera) and Bedew(emera, deni) -> Oppress(deni, rodge))\nforall x (Bedew(x, deni) -> Umteen(deni))\nOppress(emera, deni) -> Bedew(deni, rodge)\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> Oppress(x, deni))\nOppress(rodge, deni) -> Oppress(rodge, emera)\nforall x (Immoveable(x) -> Bedew(x, deni))\n\nOppress(emera, emera)\n\nforall x (Dado(x, emera) -> Oppress(x, emera)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The clarinda is profitable. The clarinda inherit the haven. The clarinda apply the felicdad. The clarinda apply the haven. The felicdad deice the clarinda. The felicdad is unbarred. The felicdad is marbled. The felicdad is sedative. The felicdad is perverse. The felicdad inherit the clarinda. The felicdad inherit the haven. The felicdad apply the clarinda. The felicdad apply the haven. The haven deice the clarinda. The haven deice the felicdad. The haven inherit the clarinda. If someone inherit the clarinda then they see the clarinda. If someone deice the clarinda and they are sedative then the clarinda is unbarred. If someone inherit the clarinda and the clarinda deice the haven then the haven apply the felicdad. If someone deice the haven then the haven is profitable. If the clarinda apply the haven then the haven deice the felicdad. If someone is sedative then they see the haven. If the felicdad apply the haven then the felicdad apply the clarinda. If someone is unbarred then they eat the haven. The haven does not eat the haven.", "logic": "\nProfitable(clarinda)\nInherit(clarinda, haven)\nApply(clarinda, felicdad)\nApply(clarinda, haven)\nDeice(felicdad, clarinda)\nUnbarred(felicdad)\nMarbled(felicdad)\nSedative(felicdad)\nPerverse(felicdad)\nInherit(felicdad, clarinda)\nInherit(felicdad, haven)\nApply(felicdad, clarinda)\nApply(felicdad, haven)\nDeice(haven, clarinda)\nDeice(haven, felicdad)\nInherit(haven, clarinda)\nforall x (Inherit(x, clarinda) -> Apply(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Deice(x, clarinda) and Sedative(x) -> Unbarred(clarinda))\nforall x (Inherit(x, clarinda) and Deice(clarinda, haven) -> Apply(haven, felicdad))\nforall x (Deice(x, haven) -> Profitable(haven))\nApply(clarinda, haven) -> Deice(haven, felicdad)\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Apply(x, haven))\nApply(felicdad, haven) -> Apply(felicdad, clarinda)\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Deice(x, haven))\n\nnot Deice(haven, haven)\n\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Deice(x, haven)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The zoe is unsent. The zoe dibble the ingmar. The zoe outgo the rab. The zoe outgo the ingmar. The rab tattle the zoe. The rab is exploitive. The rab is evergreen. The rab is homebound. The rab is pretty. The rab dibble the zoe. The rab dibble the ingmar. The rab outgo the zoe. The rab outgo the ingmar. The ingmar tattle the zoe. The ingmar tattle the rab. The ingmar dibble the zoe. If someone dibble the zoe then they see the zoe. If someone tattle the zoe and they are homebound then the zoe is exploitive. If someone dibble the zoe and the zoe tattle the ingmar then the ingmar outgo the rab. If someone tattle the ingmar then the ingmar is unsent. If the zoe outgo the ingmar then the ingmar tattle the rab. If someone is homebound then they see the ingmar. If the rab outgo the ingmar then the rab outgo the zoe. If someone is exploitive then they eat the ingmar. The zoe tattle the zoe.", "logic": "\nUnsent(zoe)\nDibble(zoe, ingmar)\nOutgo(zoe, rab)\nOutgo(zoe, ingmar)\nTattle(rab, zoe)\nExploitive(rab)\nEvergreen(rab)\nHomebound(rab)\nPretty(rab)\nDibble(rab, zoe)\nDibble(rab, ingmar)\nOutgo(rab, zoe)\nOutgo(rab, ingmar)\nTattle(ingmar, zoe)\nTattle(ingmar, rab)\nDibble(ingmar, zoe)\nforall x (Dibble(x, zoe) -> Outgo(x, zoe))\nforall x (Tattle(x, zoe) and Homebound(x) -> Exploitive(zoe))\nforall x (Dibble(x, zoe) and Tattle(zoe, ingmar) -> Outgo(ingmar, rab))\nforall x (Tattle(x, ingmar) -> Unsent(ingmar))\nOutgo(zoe, ingmar) -> Tattle(ingmar, rab)\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Outgo(x, ingmar))\nOutgo(rab, ingmar) -> Outgo(rab, zoe)\nforall x (Exploitive(x) -> Tattle(x, ingmar))\n\nTattle(zoe, zoe)\n\nTattle(zoe, zoe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The oliver is chanted. The oliver bedamn the barnabas. The oliver substitute the mikey. The oliver substitute the barnabas. The mikey fashion the oliver. The mikey is illusive. The mikey is unexcited. The mikey is oriental. The mikey is eruptive. The mikey bedamn the oliver. The mikey bedamn the barnabas. The mikey substitute the oliver. The mikey substitute the barnabas. The barnabas fashion the oliver. The barnabas fashion the mikey. The barnabas bedamn the oliver. If someone bedamn the oliver then they see the oliver. If someone fashion the oliver and they are oriental then the oliver is illusive. If someone bedamn the oliver and the oliver fashion the barnabas then the barnabas substitute the mikey. If someone fashion the barnabas then the barnabas is chanted. If the oliver substitute the barnabas then the barnabas fashion the mikey. If someone is oriental then they see the barnabas. If the mikey substitute the barnabas then the mikey substitute the oliver. If someone is illusive then they eat the barnabas. The oliver does not like the mikey.", "logic": "\nChanted(oliver)\nBedamn(oliver, barnabas)\nSubstitute(oliver, mikey)\nSubstitute(oliver, barnabas)\nFashion(mikey, oliver)\nIllusive(mikey)\nUnexcited(mikey)\nOriental(mikey)\nEruptive(mikey)\nBedamn(mikey, oliver)\nBedamn(mikey, barnabas)\nSubstitute(mikey, oliver)\nSubstitute(mikey, barnabas)\nFashion(barnabas, oliver)\nFashion(barnabas, mikey)\nBedamn(barnabas, oliver)\nforall x (Bedamn(x, oliver) -> Substitute(x, oliver))\nforall x (Fashion(x, oliver) and Oriental(x) -> Illusive(oliver))\nforall x (Bedamn(x, oliver) and Fashion(oliver, barnabas) -> Substitute(barnabas, mikey))\nforall x (Fashion(x, barnabas) -> Chanted(barnabas))\nSubstitute(oliver, barnabas) -> Fashion(barnabas, mikey)\nforall x (Oriental(x) -> Substitute(x, barnabas))\nSubstitute(mikey, barnabas) -> Substitute(mikey, oliver)\nforall x (Illusive(x) -> Fashion(x, barnabas))\n\nnot Bedamn(oliver, mikey)\n\nnot Bedamn(oliver, mikey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The kyrstin is puberulent. The kyrstin blither the quincey. The kyrstin ruminate the berchtold. The kyrstin ruminate the quincey. The berchtold jacklight the kyrstin. The berchtold is bombastic. The berchtold is motor. The berchtold is intrinsic. The berchtold is preemptive. The berchtold blither the kyrstin. The berchtold blither the quincey. The berchtold ruminate the kyrstin. The berchtold ruminate the quincey. The quincey jacklight the kyrstin. The quincey jacklight the berchtold. The quincey blither the kyrstin. If someone blither the kyrstin then they see the kyrstin. If someone jacklight the kyrstin and they are intrinsic then the kyrstin is bombastic. If someone blither the kyrstin and the kyrstin jacklight the quincey then the quincey ruminate the berchtold. If someone jacklight the quincey then the quincey is puberulent. If the kyrstin ruminate the quincey then the quincey jacklight the berchtold. If someone is intrinsic then they see the quincey. If the berchtold ruminate the quincey then the berchtold ruminate the kyrstin. If someone is bombastic then they eat the quincey. The quincey is bombastic.", "logic": "\nPuberulent(kyrstin)\nBlither(kyrstin, quincey)\nRuminate(kyrstin, berchtold)\nRuminate(kyrstin, quincey)\nJacklight(berchtold, kyrstin)\nBombastic(berchtold)\nMotor(berchtold)\nIntrinsic(berchtold)\nPreemptive(berchtold)\nBlither(berchtold, kyrstin)\nBlither(berchtold, quincey)\nRuminate(berchtold, kyrstin)\nRuminate(berchtold, quincey)\nJacklight(quincey, kyrstin)\nJacklight(quincey, berchtold)\nBlither(quincey, kyrstin)\nforall x (Blither(x, kyrstin) -> Ruminate(x, kyrstin))\nforall x (Jacklight(x, kyrstin) and Intrinsic(x) -> Bombastic(kyrstin))\nforall x (Blither(x, kyrstin) and Jacklight(kyrstin, quincey) -> Ruminate(quincey, berchtold))\nforall x (Jacklight(x, quincey) -> Puberulent(quincey))\nRuminate(kyrstin, quincey) -> Jacklight(quincey, berchtold)\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Ruminate(x, quincey))\nRuminate(berchtold, quincey) -> Ruminate(berchtold, kyrstin)\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Jacklight(x, quincey))\n\nBombastic(quincey)\n\nBombastic(quincey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The godfree is poached. The godfree beggar the paula. The godfree confound the maxine. The godfree confound the paula. The maxine caliper the godfree. The maxine is pilary. The maxine is damask. The maxine is isosmotic. The maxine is burdensome. The maxine beggar the godfree. The maxine beggar the paula. The maxine confound the godfree. The maxine confound the paula. The paula caliper the godfree. The paula caliper the maxine. The paula beggar the godfree. If someone beggar the godfree then they see the godfree. If someone caliper the godfree and they are isosmotic then the godfree is pilary. If someone beggar the godfree and the godfree caliper the paula then the paula confound the maxine. If someone caliper the paula then the paula is poached. If the godfree confound the paula then the paula caliper the maxine. If someone is isosmotic then they see the paula. If the maxine confound the paula then the maxine confound the godfree. If someone is pilary then they eat the paula. The godfree does not like the godfree.", "logic": "\nPoached(godfree)\nBeggar(godfree, paula)\nConfound(godfree, maxine)\nConfound(godfree, paula)\nCaliper(maxine, godfree)\nPilary(maxine)\nDamask(maxine)\nIsosmotic(maxine)\nBurdensome(maxine)\nBeggar(maxine, godfree)\nBeggar(maxine, paula)\nConfound(maxine, godfree)\nConfound(maxine, paula)\nCaliper(paula, godfree)\nCaliper(paula, maxine)\nBeggar(paula, godfree)\nforall x (Beggar(x, godfree) -> Confound(x, godfree))\nforall x (Caliper(x, godfree) and Isosmotic(x) -> Pilary(godfree))\nforall x (Beggar(x, godfree) and Caliper(godfree, paula) -> Confound(paula, maxine))\nforall x (Caliper(x, paula) -> Poached(paula))\nConfound(godfree, paula) -> Caliper(paula, maxine)\nforall x (Isosmotic(x) -> Confound(x, paula))\nConfound(maxine, paula) -> Confound(maxine, godfree)\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Caliper(x, paula))\n\nnot Beggar(godfree, godfree)\n\nnot Beggar(godfree, godfree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The erda is sleety. The erda yawl the fons. The erda parade the eben. The erda parade the fons. The eben dilapidate the erda. The eben is tongan. The eben is refreshing. The eben is glistening. The eben is soured. The eben yawl the erda. The eben yawl the fons. The eben parade the erda. The eben parade the fons. The fons dilapidate the erda. The fons dilapidate the eben. The fons yawl the erda. If someone yawl the erda then they see the erda. If someone dilapidate the erda and they are glistening then the erda is tongan. If someone yawl the erda and the erda dilapidate the fons then the fons parade the eben. If someone dilapidate the fons then the fons is sleety. If the erda parade the fons then the fons dilapidate the eben. If someone is glistening then they see the fons. If the eben parade the fons then the eben parade the erda. If someone is tongan then they eat the fons. The erda dilapidate the eben.", "logic": "\nSleety(erda)\nYawl(erda, fons)\nParade(erda, eben)\nParade(erda, fons)\nDilapidate(eben, erda)\nTongan(eben)\nRefreshing(eben)\nGlistening(eben)\nSoured(eben)\nYawl(eben, erda)\nYawl(eben, fons)\nParade(eben, erda)\nParade(eben, fons)\nDilapidate(fons, erda)\nDilapidate(fons, eben)\nYawl(fons, erda)\nforall x (Yawl(x, erda) -> Parade(x, erda))\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, erda) and Glistening(x) -> Tongan(erda))\nforall x (Yawl(x, erda) and Dilapidate(erda, fons) -> Parade(fons, eben))\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, fons) -> Sleety(fons))\nParade(erda, fons) -> Dilapidate(fons, eben)\nforall x (Glistening(x) -> Parade(x, fons))\nParade(eben, fons) -> Parade(eben, erda)\nforall x (Tongan(x) -> Dilapidate(x, fons))\n\nDilapidate(erda, eben)\n\nDilapidate(erda, eben) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The shandy stockade the ryan. The shandy snuggle the halimeda. The shandy overtax the dulcinea. The ryan stockade the dulcinea. The ryan snuggle the halimeda. The halimeda is not mutilated. The halimeda snuggle the shandy. The halimeda snuggle the dulcinea. The dulcinea is not mutilated. The dulcinea is not sapphirine. The dulcinea snuggle the halimeda. The dulcinea overtax the shandy. If someone overtax the dulcinea then the dulcinea stockade the halimeda. If someone stockade the halimeda and the halimeda is stray then the halimeda stockade the ryan. If someone overtax the ryan and they do not see the ryan then they see the dulcinea. If someone stockade the halimeda then they like the ryan. If someone overtax the halimeda then they are stray. If someone stockade the ryan then they are not stray. If someone overtax the shandy then they do not like the shandy. If someone snuggle the halimeda and they are mutilated then the halimeda does not like the dulcinea. The shandy snuggle the halimeda.", "logic": "\nStockade(shandy, ryan)\nSnuggle(shandy, halimeda)\nOvertax(shandy, dulcinea)\nStockade(ryan, dulcinea)\nSnuggle(ryan, halimeda)\nnot Mutilated(halimeda)\nSnuggle(halimeda, shandy)\nSnuggle(halimeda, dulcinea)\nnot Mutilated(dulcinea)\nnot Sapphirine(dulcinea)\nSnuggle(dulcinea, halimeda)\nOvertax(dulcinea, shandy)\nforall x (Overtax(x, dulcinea) -> Stockade(dulcinea, halimeda))\nforall x (Stockade(x, halimeda) and Stray(halimeda) -> Stockade(halimeda, ryan))\nforall x (Overtax(x, ryan) and not Snuggle(x, ryan) -> Snuggle(x, dulcinea))\nforall x (Stockade(x, halimeda) -> Stockade(x, ryan))\nforall x (Overtax(x, halimeda) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Stockade(x, ryan) -> not Stray(x))\nforall x (Overtax(x, shandy) -> not Stockade(x, shandy))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, halimeda) and Mutilated(x) -> not Stockade(halimeda, dulcinea))\n\nSnuggle(shandy, halimeda)\n\ntherefore Snuggle(shandy, halimeda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The rosella rusticate the jethro. The rosella shamanize the shurlock. The rosella spice the sissy. The jethro rusticate the sissy. The jethro shamanize the shurlock. The shurlock is not unmown. The shurlock shamanize the rosella. The shurlock shamanize the sissy. The sissy is not unmown. The sissy is not beginning. The sissy shamanize the shurlock. The sissy spice the rosella. If someone spice the sissy then the sissy rusticate the shurlock. If someone rusticate the shurlock and the shurlock is standpat then the shurlock rusticate the jethro. If someone spice the jethro and they do not see the jethro then they see the sissy. If someone rusticate the shurlock then they like the jethro. If someone spice the shurlock then they are standpat. If someone rusticate the jethro then they are not standpat. If someone spice the rosella then they do not like the rosella. If someone shamanize the shurlock and they are unmown then the shurlock does not like the sissy. The sissy does not visit the rosella.", "logic": "\nRusticate(rosella, jethro)\nShamanize(rosella, shurlock)\nSpice(rosella, sissy)\nRusticate(jethro, sissy)\nShamanize(jethro, shurlock)\nnot Unmown(shurlock)\nShamanize(shurlock, rosella)\nShamanize(shurlock, sissy)\nnot Unmown(sissy)\nnot Beginning(sissy)\nShamanize(sissy, shurlock)\nSpice(sissy, rosella)\nforall x (Spice(x, sissy) -> Rusticate(sissy, shurlock))\nforall x (Rusticate(x, shurlock) and Standpat(shurlock) -> Rusticate(shurlock, jethro))\nforall x (Spice(x, jethro) and not Shamanize(x, jethro) -> Shamanize(x, sissy))\nforall x (Rusticate(x, shurlock) -> Rusticate(x, jethro))\nforall x (Spice(x, shurlock) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Rusticate(x, jethro) -> not Standpat(x))\nforall x (Spice(x, rosella) -> not Rusticate(x, rosella))\nforall x (Shamanize(x, shurlock) and Unmown(x) -> not Rusticate(shurlock, sissy))\n\nnot Spice(sissy, rosella)\n\ntherefore Spice(sissy, rosella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The colleen sever the renelle. The colleen cakewalk the merl. The colleen centre the rik. The renelle sever the rik. The renelle cakewalk the merl. The merl is not vivace. The merl cakewalk the colleen. The merl cakewalk the rik. The rik is not vivace. The rik is not extra. The rik cakewalk the merl. The rik centre the colleen. If someone centre the rik then the rik sever the merl. If someone sever the merl and the merl is meltable then the merl sever the renelle. If someone centre the renelle and they do not see the renelle then they see the rik. If someone sever the merl then they like the renelle. If someone centre the merl then they are meltable. If someone sever the renelle then they are not meltable. If someone centre the colleen then they do not like the colleen. If someone cakewalk the merl and they are vivace then the merl does not like the rik. The rik sever the merl.", "logic": "\nSever(colleen, renelle)\nCakewalk(colleen, merl)\nCentre(colleen, rik)\nSever(renelle, rik)\nCakewalk(renelle, merl)\nnot Vivace(merl)\nCakewalk(merl, colleen)\nCakewalk(merl, rik)\nnot Vivace(rik)\nnot Extra(rik)\nCakewalk(rik, merl)\nCentre(rik, colleen)\nforall x (Centre(x, rik) -> Sever(rik, merl))\nforall x (Sever(x, merl) and Meltable(merl) -> Sever(merl, renelle))\nforall x (Centre(x, renelle) and not Cakewalk(x, renelle) -> Cakewalk(x, rik))\nforall x (Sever(x, merl) -> Sever(x, renelle))\nforall x (Centre(x, merl) -> Meltable(x))\nforall x (Sever(x, renelle) -> not Meltable(x))\nforall x (Centre(x, colleen) -> not Sever(x, colleen))\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, merl) and Vivace(x) -> not Sever(merl, rik))\n\nSever(rik, merl)\n\nCentre(colleen, rik) and forall x (Centre(x, rik) -> Sever(rik, merl)) -> therefore Sever(rik, merl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The marissa ensnare the johnathon. The marissa reprint the dorise. The marissa board the aleks. The johnathon ensnare the aleks. The johnathon reprint the dorise. The dorise is not hairy. The dorise reprint the marissa. The dorise reprint the aleks. The aleks is not hairy. The aleks is not aligning. The aleks reprint the dorise. The aleks board the marissa. If someone board the aleks then the aleks ensnare the dorise. If someone ensnare the dorise and the dorise is lowest then the dorise ensnare the johnathon. If someone board the johnathon and they do not see the johnathon then they see the aleks. If someone ensnare the dorise then they like the johnathon. If someone board the dorise then they are lowest. If someone ensnare the johnathon then they are not lowest. If someone board the marissa then they do not like the marissa. If someone reprint the dorise and they are hairy then the dorise does not like the aleks. The marissa is lowest.", "logic": "\nEnsnare(marissa, johnathon)\nReprint(marissa, dorise)\nBoard(marissa, aleks)\nEnsnare(johnathon, aleks)\nReprint(johnathon, dorise)\nnot Hairy(dorise)\nReprint(dorise, marissa)\nReprint(dorise, aleks)\nnot Hairy(aleks)\nnot Aligning(aleks)\nReprint(aleks, dorise)\nBoard(aleks, marissa)\nforall x (Board(x, aleks) -> Ensnare(aleks, dorise))\nforall x (Ensnare(x, dorise) and Lowest(dorise) -> Ensnare(dorise, johnathon))\nforall x (Board(x, johnathon) and not Reprint(x, johnathon) -> Reprint(x, aleks))\nforall x (Ensnare(x, dorise) -> Ensnare(x, johnathon))\nforall x (Board(x, dorise) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Ensnare(x, johnathon) -> not Lowest(x))\nforall x (Board(x, marissa) -> not Ensnare(x, marissa))\nforall x (Reprint(x, dorise) and Hairy(x) -> not Ensnare(dorise, aleks))\n\nLowest(marissa)\n\nEnsnare(marissa, johnathon) and forall x (Ensnare(x, johnathon) -> not Lowest(x)) -> therefore not Lowest(marissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The zebadiah rediscover the katina. The zebadiah practise the lilli. The zebadiah bunco the debra. The katina rediscover the debra. The katina practise the lilli. The lilli is not stoical. The lilli practise the zebadiah. The lilli practise the debra. The debra is not stoical. The debra is not swingeing. The debra practise the lilli. The debra bunco the zebadiah. If someone bunco the debra then the debra rediscover the lilli. If someone rediscover the lilli and the lilli is bone then the lilli rediscover the katina. If someone bunco the katina and they do not see the katina then they see the debra. If someone rediscover the lilli then they like the katina. If someone bunco the lilli then they are bone. If someone rediscover the katina then they are not bone. If someone bunco the zebadiah then they do not like the zebadiah. If someone practise the lilli and they are stoical then the lilli does not like the debra. The debra rediscover the katina.", "logic": "\nRediscover(zebadiah, katina)\nPractise(zebadiah, lilli)\nBunco(zebadiah, debra)\nRediscover(katina, debra)\nPractise(katina, lilli)\nnot Stoical(lilli)\nPractise(lilli, zebadiah)\nPractise(lilli, debra)\nnot Stoical(debra)\nnot Swingeing(debra)\nPractise(debra, lilli)\nBunco(debra, zebadiah)\nforall x (Bunco(x, debra) -> Rediscover(debra, lilli))\nforall x (Rediscover(x, lilli) and Bone(lilli) -> Rediscover(lilli, katina))\nforall x (Bunco(x, katina) and not Practise(x, katina) -> Practise(x, debra))\nforall x (Rediscover(x, lilli) -> Rediscover(x, katina))\nforall x (Bunco(x, lilli) -> Bone(x))\nforall x (Rediscover(x, katina) -> not Bone(x))\nforall x (Bunco(x, zebadiah) -> not Rediscover(x, zebadiah))\nforall x (Practise(x, lilli) and Stoical(x) -> not Rediscover(lilli, debra))\n\nRediscover(debra, katina)\n\nBunco(zebadiah, debra) and forall x (Bunco(x, debra) -> Rediscover(debra, lilli)) -> therefore Rediscover(debra, lilli) Rediscover(debra, lilli) and forall x (Rediscover(x, lilli) -> Rediscover(x, katina)) -> therefore Rediscover(debra, katina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The lucilia pocket the marysa. The lucilia purloin the wilson. The lucilia grout the sharna. The marysa pocket the sharna. The marysa purloin the wilson. The wilson is not prismatic. The wilson purloin the lucilia. The wilson purloin the sharna. The sharna is not prismatic. The sharna is not anadromous. The sharna purloin the wilson. The sharna grout the lucilia. If someone grout the sharna then the sharna pocket the wilson. If someone pocket the wilson and the wilson is nonechoic then the wilson pocket the marysa. If someone grout the marysa and they do not see the marysa then they see the sharna. If someone pocket the wilson then they like the marysa. If someone grout the wilson then they are nonechoic. If someone pocket the marysa then they are not nonechoic. If someone grout the lucilia then they do not like the lucilia. If someone purloin the wilson and they are prismatic then the wilson does not like the sharna. The sharna does not like the marysa.", "logic": "\nPocket(lucilia, marysa)\nPurloin(lucilia, wilson)\nGrout(lucilia, sharna)\nPocket(marysa, sharna)\nPurloin(marysa, wilson)\nnot Prismatic(wilson)\nPurloin(wilson, lucilia)\nPurloin(wilson, sharna)\nnot Prismatic(sharna)\nnot Anadromous(sharna)\nPurloin(sharna, wilson)\nGrout(sharna, lucilia)\nforall x (Grout(x, sharna) -> Pocket(sharna, wilson))\nforall x (Pocket(x, wilson) and Nonechoic(wilson) -> Pocket(wilson, marysa))\nforall x (Grout(x, marysa) and not Purloin(x, marysa) -> Purloin(x, sharna))\nforall x (Pocket(x, wilson) -> Pocket(x, marysa))\nforall x (Grout(x, wilson) -> Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Pocket(x, marysa) -> not Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Grout(x, lucilia) -> not Pocket(x, lucilia))\nforall x (Purloin(x, wilson) and Prismatic(x) -> not Pocket(wilson, sharna))\n\nnot Pocket(sharna, marysa)\n\nGrout(lucilia, sharna) and forall x (Grout(x, sharna) -> Pocket(sharna, wilson)) -> therefore Pocket(sharna, wilson) Pocket(sharna, wilson) and forall x (Pocket(x, wilson) -> Pocket(x, marysa)) -> therefore Pocket(sharna, marysa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The bessie reignite the guy. The bessie sleet the brynn. The bessie compile the maisey. The guy reignite the maisey. The guy sleet the brynn. The brynn is not eastward. The brynn sleet the bessie. The brynn sleet the maisey. The maisey is not eastward. The maisey is not british. The maisey sleet the brynn. The maisey compile the bessie. If someone compile the maisey then the maisey reignite the brynn. If someone reignite the brynn and the brynn is strapping then the brynn reignite the guy. If someone compile the guy and they do not see the guy then they see the maisey. If someone reignite the brynn then they like the guy. If someone compile the brynn then they are strapping. If someone reignite the guy then they are not strapping. If someone compile the bessie then they do not like the bessie. If someone sleet the brynn and they are eastward then the brynn does not like the maisey. The maisey is not strapping.", "logic": "\nReignite(bessie, guy)\nSleet(bessie, brynn)\nCompile(bessie, maisey)\nReignite(guy, maisey)\nSleet(guy, brynn)\nnot Eastward(brynn)\nSleet(brynn, bessie)\nSleet(brynn, maisey)\nnot Eastward(maisey)\nnot British(maisey)\nSleet(maisey, brynn)\nCompile(maisey, bessie)\nforall x (Compile(x, maisey) -> Reignite(maisey, brynn))\nforall x (Reignite(x, brynn) and Strapping(brynn) -> Reignite(brynn, guy))\nforall x (Compile(x, guy) and not Sleet(x, guy) -> Sleet(x, maisey))\nforall x (Reignite(x, brynn) -> Reignite(x, guy))\nforall x (Compile(x, brynn) -> Strapping(x))\nforall x (Reignite(x, guy) -> not Strapping(x))\nforall x (Compile(x, bessie) -> not Reignite(x, bessie))\nforall x (Sleet(x, brynn) and Eastward(x) -> not Reignite(brynn, maisey))\n\nnot Strapping(maisey)\n\nCompile(bessie, maisey) and forall x (Compile(x, maisey) -> Reignite(maisey, brynn)) -> therefore Reignite(maisey, brynn) Reignite(maisey, brynn) and forall x (Reignite(x, brynn) -> Reignite(x, guy)) -> therefore Reignite(maisey, guy) Reignite(maisey, guy) and forall x (Reignite(x, guy) -> not Strapping(x)) -> therefore not Strapping(maisey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The hinda plate the kristyn. The hinda notarize the winthrop. The hinda relativise the batsheva. The kristyn plate the batsheva. The kristyn notarize the winthrop. The winthrop is not auricular. The winthrop notarize the hinda. The winthrop notarize the batsheva. The batsheva is not auricular. The batsheva is not smooth. The batsheva notarize the winthrop. The batsheva relativise the hinda. If someone relativise the batsheva then the batsheva plate the winthrop. If someone plate the winthrop and the winthrop is rotatable then the winthrop plate the kristyn. If someone relativise the kristyn and they do not see the kristyn then they see the batsheva. If someone plate the winthrop then they like the kristyn. If someone relativise the winthrop then they are rotatable. If someone plate the kristyn then they are not rotatable. If someone relativise the hinda then they do not like the hinda. If someone notarize the winthrop and they are auricular then the winthrop does not like the batsheva. The batsheva is rotatable.", "logic": "\nPlate(hinda, kristyn)\nNotarize(hinda, winthrop)\nRelativise(hinda, batsheva)\nPlate(kristyn, batsheva)\nNotarize(kristyn, winthrop)\nnot Auricular(winthrop)\nNotarize(winthrop, hinda)\nNotarize(winthrop, batsheva)\nnot Auricular(batsheva)\nnot Smooth(batsheva)\nNotarize(batsheva, winthrop)\nRelativise(batsheva, hinda)\nforall x (Relativise(x, batsheva) -> Plate(batsheva, winthrop))\nforall x (Plate(x, winthrop) and Rotatable(winthrop) -> Plate(winthrop, kristyn))\nforall x (Relativise(x, kristyn) and not Notarize(x, kristyn) -> Notarize(x, batsheva))\nforall x (Plate(x, winthrop) -> Plate(x, kristyn))\nforall x (Relativise(x, winthrop) -> Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Plate(x, kristyn) -> not Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Relativise(x, hinda) -> not Plate(x, hinda))\nforall x (Notarize(x, winthrop) and Auricular(x) -> not Plate(winthrop, batsheva))\n\nRotatable(batsheva)\n\nRelativise(hinda, batsheva) and forall x (Relativise(x, batsheva) -> Plate(batsheva, winthrop)) -> therefore Plate(batsheva, winthrop) Plate(batsheva, winthrop) and forall x (Plate(x, winthrop) -> Plate(x, kristyn)) -> therefore Plate(batsheva, kristyn) Plate(batsheva, kristyn) and forall x (Plate(x, kristyn) -> not Rotatable(x)) -> therefore not Rotatable(batsheva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The dawson override the gabi. The dawson financier the minna. The dawson case the lucilia. The gabi override the lucilia. The gabi financier the minna. The minna is not germane. The minna financier the dawson. The minna financier the lucilia. The lucilia is not germane. The lucilia is not ungummed. The lucilia financier the minna. The lucilia case the dawson. If someone case the lucilia then the lucilia override the minna. If someone override the minna and the minna is glaciated then the minna override the gabi. If someone case the gabi and they do not see the gabi then they see the lucilia. If someone override the minna then they like the gabi. If someone case the minna then they are glaciated. If someone override the gabi then they are not glaciated. If someone case the dawson then they do not like the dawson. If someone financier the minna and they are germane then the minna does not like the lucilia. The minna is not glaciated.", "logic": "\nOverride(dawson, gabi)\nFinancier(dawson, minna)\nCase(dawson, lucilia)\nOverride(gabi, lucilia)\nFinancier(gabi, minna)\nnot Germane(minna)\nFinancier(minna, dawson)\nFinancier(minna, lucilia)\nnot Germane(lucilia)\nnot Ungummed(lucilia)\nFinancier(lucilia, minna)\nCase(lucilia, dawson)\nforall x (Case(x, lucilia) -> Override(lucilia, minna))\nforall x (Override(x, minna) and Glaciated(minna) -> Override(minna, gabi))\nforall x (Case(x, gabi) and not Financier(x, gabi) -> Financier(x, lucilia))\nforall x (Override(x, minna) -> Override(x, gabi))\nforall x (Case(x, minna) -> Glaciated(x))\nforall x (Override(x, gabi) -> not Glaciated(x))\nforall x (Case(x, dawson) -> not Override(x, dawson))\nforall x (Financier(x, minna) and Germane(x) -> not Override(minna, lucilia))\n\nnot Glaciated(minna)\n\nforall x (Case(x, minna) -> Glaciated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The stacy transport the nathalia. The stacy collar the standford. The stacy submit the cosette. The nathalia transport the cosette. The nathalia collar the standford. The standford is not berserk. The standford collar the stacy. The standford collar the cosette. The cosette is not berserk. The cosette is not finer. The cosette collar the standford. The cosette submit the stacy. If someone submit the cosette then the cosette transport the standford. If someone transport the standford and the standford is combined then the standford transport the nathalia. If someone submit the nathalia and they do not see the nathalia then they see the cosette. If someone transport the standford then they like the nathalia. If someone submit the standford then they are combined. If someone transport the nathalia then they are not combined. If someone submit the stacy then they do not like the stacy. If someone collar the standford and they are berserk then the standford does not like the cosette. The nathalia is combined.", "logic": "\nTransport(stacy, nathalia)\nCollar(stacy, standford)\nSubmit(stacy, cosette)\nTransport(nathalia, cosette)\nCollar(nathalia, standford)\nnot Berserk(standford)\nCollar(standford, stacy)\nCollar(standford, cosette)\nnot Berserk(cosette)\nnot Finer(cosette)\nCollar(cosette, standford)\nSubmit(cosette, stacy)\nforall x (Submit(x, cosette) -> Transport(cosette, standford))\nforall x (Transport(x, standford) and Combined(standford) -> Transport(standford, nathalia))\nforall x (Submit(x, nathalia) and not Collar(x, nathalia) -> Collar(x, cosette))\nforall x (Transport(x, standford) -> Transport(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Submit(x, standford) -> Combined(x))\nforall x (Transport(x, nathalia) -> not Combined(x))\nforall x (Submit(x, stacy) -> not Transport(x, stacy))\nforall x (Collar(x, standford) and Berserk(x) -> not Transport(standford, cosette))\n\nCombined(nathalia)\n\nforall x (Submit(x, standford) -> Combined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The carissa foreshadow the gerhard. The carissa diabolise the cacilia. The carissa enquire the ignacio. The gerhard foreshadow the ignacio. The gerhard diabolise the cacilia. The cacilia is not yelled. The cacilia diabolise the carissa. The cacilia diabolise the ignacio. The ignacio is not yelled. The ignacio is not flinty. The ignacio diabolise the cacilia. The ignacio enquire the carissa. If someone enquire the ignacio then the ignacio foreshadow the cacilia. If someone foreshadow the cacilia and the cacilia is overmuch then the cacilia foreshadow the gerhard. If someone enquire the gerhard and they do not see the gerhard then they see the ignacio. If someone foreshadow the cacilia then they like the gerhard. If someone enquire the cacilia then they are overmuch. If someone foreshadow the gerhard then they are not overmuch. If someone enquire the carissa then they do not like the carissa. If someone diabolise the cacilia and they are yelled then the cacilia does not like the ignacio. The cacilia does not like the gerhard.", "logic": "\nForeshadow(carissa, gerhard)\nDiabolise(carissa, cacilia)\nEnquire(carissa, ignacio)\nForeshadow(gerhard, ignacio)\nDiabolise(gerhard, cacilia)\nnot Yelled(cacilia)\nDiabolise(cacilia, carissa)\nDiabolise(cacilia, ignacio)\nnot Yelled(ignacio)\nnot Flinty(ignacio)\nDiabolise(ignacio, cacilia)\nEnquire(ignacio, carissa)\nforall x (Enquire(x, ignacio) -> Foreshadow(ignacio, cacilia))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, cacilia) and Overmuch(cacilia) -> Foreshadow(cacilia, gerhard))\nforall x (Enquire(x, gerhard) and not Diabolise(x, gerhard) -> Diabolise(x, ignacio))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, cacilia) -> Foreshadow(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Enquire(x, cacilia) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, gerhard) -> not Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Enquire(x, carissa) -> not Foreshadow(x, carissa))\nforall x (Diabolise(x, cacilia) and Yelled(x) -> not Foreshadow(cacilia, ignacio))\n\nnot Foreshadow(cacilia, gerhard)\n\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, cacilia) and Overmuch(cacilia) -> Foreshadow(cacilia, gerhard)) <- forall x (Enquire(x, cacilia) -> Overmuch(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The cinda predict the poul. The cinda animalize the hagen. The cinda extort the alison. The poul predict the alison. The poul animalize the hagen. The hagen is not supported. The hagen animalize the cinda. The hagen animalize the alison. The alison is not supported. The alison is not directed. The alison animalize the hagen. The alison extort the cinda. If someone extort the alison then the alison predict the hagen. If someone predict the hagen and the hagen is floccose then the hagen predict the poul. If someone extort the poul and they do not see the poul then they see the alison. If someone predict the hagen then they like the poul. If someone extort the hagen then they are floccose. If someone predict the poul then they are not floccose. If someone extort the cinda then they do not like the cinda. If someone animalize the hagen and they are supported then the hagen does not like the alison. The alison animalize the alison.", "logic": "\nPredict(cinda, poul)\nAnimalize(cinda, hagen)\nExtort(cinda, alison)\nPredict(poul, alison)\nAnimalize(poul, hagen)\nnot Supported(hagen)\nAnimalize(hagen, cinda)\nAnimalize(hagen, alison)\nnot Supported(alison)\nnot Directed(alison)\nAnimalize(alison, hagen)\nExtort(alison, cinda)\nforall x (Extort(x, alison) -> Predict(alison, hagen))\nforall x (Predict(x, hagen) and Floccose(hagen) -> Predict(hagen, poul))\nforall x (Extort(x, poul) and not Animalize(x, poul) -> Animalize(x, alison))\nforall x (Predict(x, hagen) -> Predict(x, poul))\nforall x (Extort(x, hagen) -> Floccose(x))\nforall x (Predict(x, poul) -> not Floccose(x))\nforall x (Extort(x, cinda) -> not Predict(x, cinda))\nforall x (Animalize(x, hagen) and Supported(x) -> not Predict(hagen, alison))\n\nAnimalize(alison, alison)\n\nforall x (Extort(x, poul) and not Animalize(x, poul) -> Animalize(x, alison)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The dru usurp the nanon. The dru birr the helena. The dru redeploy the mureil. The nanon usurp the mureil. The nanon birr the helena. The helena is not futureless. The helena birr the dru. The helena birr the mureil. The mureil is not futureless. The mureil is not uniform. The mureil birr the helena. The mureil redeploy the dru. If someone redeploy the mureil then the mureil usurp the helena. If someone usurp the helena and the helena is appositive then the helena usurp the nanon. If someone redeploy the nanon and they do not see the nanon then they see the mureil. If someone usurp the helena then they like the nanon. If someone redeploy the helena then they are appositive. If someone usurp the nanon then they are not appositive. If someone redeploy the dru then they do not like the dru. If someone birr the helena and they are futureless then the helena does not like the mureil. The mureil does not like the mureil.", "logic": "\nUsurp(dru, nanon)\nBirr(dru, helena)\nRedeploy(dru, mureil)\nUsurp(nanon, mureil)\nBirr(nanon, helena)\nnot Futureless(helena)\nBirr(helena, dru)\nBirr(helena, mureil)\nnot Futureless(mureil)\nnot Uniform(mureil)\nBirr(mureil, helena)\nRedeploy(mureil, dru)\nforall x (Redeploy(x, mureil) -> Usurp(mureil, helena))\nforall x (Usurp(x, helena) and Appositive(helena) -> Usurp(helena, nanon))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, nanon) and not Birr(x, nanon) -> Birr(x, mureil))\nforall x (Usurp(x, helena) -> Usurp(x, nanon))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, helena) -> Appositive(x))\nforall x (Usurp(x, nanon) -> not Appositive(x))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, dru) -> not Usurp(x, dru))\nforall x (Birr(x, helena) and Futureless(x) -> not Usurp(helena, mureil))\n\nnot Usurp(mureil, mureil)\n\nnot Usurp(mureil, mureil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The loni articulate the hyacinth. The loni egotrip the ashish. The loni imbed the etheline. The hyacinth articulate the etheline. The hyacinth egotrip the ashish. The ashish is not submersed. The ashish egotrip the loni. The ashish egotrip the etheline. The etheline is not submersed. The etheline is not astomatal. The etheline egotrip the ashish. The etheline imbed the loni. If someone imbed the etheline then the etheline articulate the ashish. If someone articulate the ashish and the ashish is palmy then the ashish articulate the hyacinth. If someone imbed the hyacinth and they do not see the hyacinth then they see the etheline. If someone articulate the ashish then they like the hyacinth. If someone imbed the ashish then they are palmy. If someone articulate the hyacinth then they are not palmy. If someone imbed the loni then they do not like the loni. If someone egotrip the ashish and they are submersed then the ashish does not like the etheline. The ashish articulate the loni.", "logic": "\nArticulate(loni, hyacinth)\nEgotrip(loni, ashish)\nImbed(loni, etheline)\nArticulate(hyacinth, etheline)\nEgotrip(hyacinth, ashish)\nnot Submersed(ashish)\nEgotrip(ashish, loni)\nEgotrip(ashish, etheline)\nnot Submersed(etheline)\nnot Astomatal(etheline)\nEgotrip(etheline, ashish)\nImbed(etheline, loni)\nforall x (Imbed(x, etheline) -> Articulate(etheline, ashish))\nforall x (Articulate(x, ashish) and Palmy(ashish) -> Articulate(ashish, hyacinth))\nforall x (Imbed(x, hyacinth) and not Egotrip(x, hyacinth) -> Egotrip(x, etheline))\nforall x (Articulate(x, ashish) -> Articulate(x, hyacinth))\nforall x (Imbed(x, ashish) -> Palmy(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x, hyacinth) -> not Palmy(x))\nforall x (Imbed(x, loni) -> not Articulate(x, loni))\nforall x (Egotrip(x, ashish) and Submersed(x) -> not Articulate(ashish, etheline))\n\nArticulate(ashish, loni)\n\nArticulate(ashish, loni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The riva obstinate the oralie. The riva underrate the jenelle. The riva contrast the othella. The oralie obstinate the othella. The oralie underrate the jenelle. The jenelle is not awake. The jenelle underrate the riva. The jenelle underrate the othella. The othella is not awake. The othella is not parked. The othella underrate the jenelle. The othella contrast the riva. If someone contrast the othella then the othella obstinate the jenelle. If someone obstinate the jenelle and the jenelle is narcotised then the jenelle obstinate the oralie. If someone contrast the oralie and they do not see the oralie then they see the othella. If someone obstinate the jenelle then they like the oralie. If someone contrast the jenelle then they are narcotised. If someone obstinate the oralie then they are not narcotised. If someone contrast the riva then they do not like the riva. If someone underrate the jenelle and they are awake then the jenelle does not like the othella. The jenelle does not see the jenelle.", "logic": "\nObstinate(riva, oralie)\nUnderrate(riva, jenelle)\nContrast(riva, othella)\nObstinate(oralie, othella)\nUnderrate(oralie, jenelle)\nnot Awake(jenelle)\nUnderrate(jenelle, riva)\nUnderrate(jenelle, othella)\nnot Awake(othella)\nnot Parked(othella)\nUnderrate(othella, jenelle)\nContrast(othella, riva)\nforall x (Contrast(x, othella) -> Obstinate(othella, jenelle))\nforall x (Obstinate(x, jenelle) and Narcotised(jenelle) -> Obstinate(jenelle, oralie))\nforall x (Contrast(x, oralie) and not Underrate(x, oralie) -> Underrate(x, othella))\nforall x (Obstinate(x, jenelle) -> Obstinate(x, oralie))\nforall x (Contrast(x, jenelle) -> Narcotised(x))\nforall x (Obstinate(x, oralie) -> not Narcotised(x))\nforall x (Contrast(x, riva) -> not Obstinate(x, riva))\nforall x (Underrate(x, jenelle) and Awake(x) -> not Obstinate(jenelle, othella))\n\nnot Underrate(jenelle, jenelle)\n\nnot Underrate(jenelle, jenelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The dixie chide the barbette. The dixie muddy the tarra. The dixie flog the sherill. The barbette chide the sherill. The barbette muddy the tarra. The tarra is not southerly. The tarra muddy the dixie. The tarra muddy the sherill. The sherill is not southerly. The sherill is not injectable. The sherill muddy the tarra. The sherill flog the dixie. If someone flog the sherill then the sherill chide the tarra. If someone chide the tarra and the tarra is monovular then the tarra chide the barbette. If someone flog the barbette and they do not see the barbette then they see the sherill. If someone chide the tarra then they like the barbette. If someone flog the tarra then they are monovular. If someone chide the barbette then they are not monovular. If someone flog the dixie then they do not like the dixie. If someone muddy the tarra and they are southerly then the tarra does not like the sherill. The sherill muddy the dixie.", "logic": "\nChide(dixie, barbette)\nMuddy(dixie, tarra)\nFlog(dixie, sherill)\nChide(barbette, sherill)\nMuddy(barbette, tarra)\nnot Southerly(tarra)\nMuddy(tarra, dixie)\nMuddy(tarra, sherill)\nnot Southerly(sherill)\nnot Injectable(sherill)\nMuddy(sherill, tarra)\nFlog(sherill, dixie)\nforall x (Flog(x, sherill) -> Chide(sherill, tarra))\nforall x (Chide(x, tarra) and Monovular(tarra) -> Chide(tarra, barbette))\nforall x (Flog(x, barbette) and not Muddy(x, barbette) -> Muddy(x, sherill))\nforall x (Chide(x, tarra) -> Chide(x, barbette))\nforall x (Flog(x, tarra) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Chide(x, barbette) -> not Monovular(x))\nforall x (Flog(x, dixie) -> not Chide(x, dixie))\nforall x (Muddy(x, tarra) and Southerly(x) -> not Chide(tarra, sherill))\n\nMuddy(sherill, dixie)\n\nMuddy(sherill, dixie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "Zsazsa is fluffy. Cally is not unethical. Salvador is fluffy. White people are pervasive. If someone is bated and senseless then they are not fluffy. All pervasive, bated people are mutual. All anadromous people are mutual. Young people are anadromous. If Cally is unethical then Cally is anadromous. Salvador is fluffy.", "logic": "\nFluffy(zsazsa)\nnot Unethical(cally)\nFluffy(salvador)\nforall x (Mutual(x) -> Pervasive(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) and Senseless(x) -> not Fluffy(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and Bated(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Anadromous(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) -> Anadromous(x))\nUnethical(cally) -> Anadromous(cally)\n\nFluffy(salvador)\n\ntherefore Fluffy(salvador)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Hiram is clitoric. Tannie is not carbonyl. Siward is clitoric. White people are huxleyan. If someone is allelic and fluvial then they are not clitoric. All huxleyan, allelic people are combined. All raising people are combined. Young people are raising. If Tannie is carbonyl then Tannie is raising. Hiram is not clitoric.", "logic": "\nClitoric(hiram)\nnot Carbonyl(tannie)\nClitoric(siward)\nforall x (Combined(x) -> Huxleyan(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) and Fluvial(x) -> not Clitoric(x))\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) and Allelic(x) -> Combined(x))\nforall x (Raising(x) -> Combined(x))\nforall x (Clitoric(x) -> Raising(x))\nCarbonyl(tannie) -> Raising(tannie)\n\nnot Clitoric(hiram)\n\ntherefore Clitoric(hiram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Rahel is xxiii. Merlina is not suave. Jerrilee is xxiii. White people are quartan. If someone is amiable and afghan then they are not xxiii. All quartan, amiable people are unbendable. All alveolate people are unbendable. Young people are alveolate. If Merlina is suave then Merlina is alveolate. Rahel is alveolate.", "logic": "\nXxiii(rahel)\nnot Suave(merlina)\nXxiii(jerrilee)\nforall x (Unbendable(x) -> Quartan(x))\nforall x (Amiable(x) and Afghan(x) -> not Xxiii(x))\nforall x (Quartan(x) and Amiable(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Alveolate(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nSuave(merlina) -> Alveolate(merlina)\n\nAlveolate(rahel)\n\nXxiii(rahel) and forall x (Xxiii(x) -> Alveolate(x)) -> therefore Alveolate(rahel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Hillary is subacute. Alwin is not alcoholic. Sandie is subacute. White people are articulary. If someone is burdenless and flaring then they are not subacute. All articulary, burdenless people are disastrous. All colloidal people are disastrous. Young people are colloidal. If Alwin is alcoholic then Alwin is colloidal. Hillary is not colloidal.", "logic": "\nSubacute(hillary)\nnot Alcoholic(alwin)\nSubacute(sandie)\nforall x (Disastrous(x) -> Articulary(x))\nforall x (Burdenless(x) and Flaring(x) -> not Subacute(x))\nforall x (Articulary(x) and Burdenless(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nAlcoholic(alwin) -> Colloidal(alwin)\n\nnot Colloidal(hillary)\n\nSubacute(hillary) and forall x (Subacute(x) -> Colloidal(x)) -> therefore Colloidal(hillary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Hari is cheliceral. Mirella is not ridiculous. Stacia is cheliceral. White people are spastic. If someone is unsent and tiered then they are not cheliceral. All spastic, unsent people are iridaceous. All unuttered people are iridaceous. Young people are unuttered. If Mirella is ridiculous then Mirella is unuttered. Hari is iridaceous.", "logic": "\nCheliceral(hari)\nnot Ridiculous(mirella)\nCheliceral(stacia)\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Spastic(x))\nforall x (Unsent(x) and Tiered(x) -> not Cheliceral(x))\nforall x (Spastic(x) and Unsent(x) -> Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) -> Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Cheliceral(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nRidiculous(mirella) -> Unuttered(mirella)\n\nIridaceous(hari)\n\nCheliceral(hari) and forall x (Cheliceral(x) -> Unuttered(x)) -> therefore Unuttered(hari) Unuttered(hari) and forall x (Unuttered(x) -> Iridaceous(x)) -> therefore Iridaceous(hari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Carma is grownup. Elga is not continent. Lothar is grownup. White people are dauntless. If someone is fuzzed and unmanly then they are not grownup. All dauntless, fuzzed people are lowest. All frumpy people are lowest. Young people are frumpy. If Elga is continent then Elga is frumpy. Carma is not lowest.", "logic": "\nGrownup(carma)\nnot Continent(elga)\nGrownup(lothar)\nforall x (Lowest(x) -> Dauntless(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Unmanly(x) -> not Grownup(x))\nforall x (Dauntless(x) and Fuzzed(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Frumpy(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Grownup(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nContinent(elga) -> Frumpy(elga)\n\nnot Lowest(carma)\n\nGrownup(carma) and forall x (Grownup(x) -> Frumpy(x)) -> therefore Frumpy(carma) Frumpy(carma) and forall x (Frumpy(x) -> Lowest(x)) -> therefore Lowest(carma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Alastair is sent. Madalena is not snazzy. Fanya is sent. White people are trackless. If someone is widowed and scared then they are not sent. All trackless, widowed people are keyless. All acidulous people are keyless. Young people are acidulous. If Madalena is snazzy then Madalena is acidulous. Fanya is trackless.", "logic": "\nSent(alastair)\nnot Snazzy(madalena)\nSent(fanya)\nforall x (Keyless(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Widowed(x) and Scared(x) -> not Sent(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) and Widowed(x) -> Keyless(x))\nforall x (Acidulous(x) -> Keyless(x))\nforall x (Sent(x) -> Acidulous(x))\nSnazzy(madalena) -> Acidulous(madalena)\n\nTrackless(fanya)\n\nSent(fanya) and forall x (Sent(x) -> Acidulous(x)) -> therefore Acidulous(fanya) Acidulous(fanya) and forall x (Acidulous(x) -> Keyless(x)) -> therefore Keyless(fanya) Keyless(fanya) and forall x (Keyless(x) -> Trackless(x)) -> therefore Trackless(fanya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Kelci is consenting. Darren is not cranial. Holli is consenting. White people are executive. If someone is outclassed and orbitual then they are not consenting. All executive, outclassed people are unblessed. All centroidal people are unblessed. Young people are centroidal. If Darren is cranial then Darren is centroidal. Kelci is not executive.", "logic": "\nConsenting(kelci)\nnot Cranial(darren)\nConsenting(holli)\nforall x (Unblessed(x) -> Executive(x))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) and Orbitual(x) -> not Consenting(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) and Outclassed(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Centroidal(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Consenting(x) -> Centroidal(x))\nCranial(darren) -> Centroidal(darren)\n\nnot Executive(kelci)\n\nConsenting(kelci) and forall x (Consenting(x) -> Centroidal(x)) -> therefore Centroidal(kelci) Centroidal(kelci) and forall x (Centroidal(x) -> Unblessed(x)) -> therefore Unblessed(kelci) Unblessed(kelci) and forall x (Unblessed(x) -> Executive(x)) -> therefore Executive(kelci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Annamaria is parental. Iain is not ceruminous. Lisette is parental. White people are abkhazian. If someone is inward and liquid then they are not parental. All abkhazian, inward people are pectinate. All jumentous people are pectinate. Young people are jumentous. If Iain is ceruminous then Iain is jumentous. Iain is not abkhazian.", "logic": "\nParental(annamaria)\nnot Ceruminous(iain)\nParental(lisette)\nforall x (Pectinate(x) -> Abkhazian(x))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Liquid(x) -> not Parental(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Inward(x) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nCeruminous(iain) -> Jumentous(iain)\n\nnot Abkhazian(iain)\n\nforall x (Pectinate(x) -> Abkhazian(x)) <- forall x (Jumentous(x) -> Pectinate(x)) <- forall x (Parental(x) -> Jumentous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Duffie is saxon. Brunhilda is not unheralded. Yonina is saxon. White people are injured. If someone is sudanese and sexual then they are not saxon. All injured, sudanese people are homy. All standard people are homy. Young people are standard. If Brunhilda is unheralded then Brunhilda is standard. Brunhilda is standard.", "logic": "\nSaxon(duffie)\nnot Unheralded(brunhilda)\nSaxon(yonina)\nforall x (Homy(x) -> Injured(x))\nforall x (Sudanese(x) and Sexual(x) -> not Saxon(x))\nforall x (Injured(x) and Sudanese(x) -> Homy(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) -> Homy(x))\nforall x (Saxon(x) -> Standard(x))\nUnheralded(brunhilda) -> Standard(brunhilda)\n\nStandard(brunhilda)\n\nforall x (Saxon(x) -> Standard(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Wood is polytonal. Lissi is not loamy. Romeo is polytonal. White people are touchy. If someone is postmortem and garrulous then they are not polytonal. All touchy, postmortem people are wheezing. All debile people are wheezing. Young people are debile. If Lissi is loamy then Lissi is debile. Lissi is not wheezing.", "logic": "\nPolytonal(wood)\nnot Loamy(lissi)\nPolytonal(romeo)\nforall x (Wheezing(x) -> Touchy(x))\nforall x (Postmortem(x) and Garrulous(x) -> not Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Touchy(x) and Postmortem(x) -> Wheezing(x))\nforall x (Debile(x) -> Wheezing(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Debile(x))\nLoamy(lissi) -> Debile(lissi)\n\nnot Wheezing(lissi)\n\nforall x (Debile(x) -> Wheezing(x)) <- forall x (Polytonal(x) -> Debile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Zacharia is lame. Reiko is not doomed. Gillan is lame. White people are neapolitan. If someone is unwilling and bullocky then they are not lame. All neapolitan, unwilling people are unwieldy. All catacorner people are unwieldy. Young people are catacorner. If Reiko is doomed then Reiko is catacorner. Reiko is bullocky.", "logic": "\nLame(zacharia)\nnot Doomed(reiko)\nLame(gillan)\nforall x (Unwieldy(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and Bullocky(x) -> not Lame(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) and Unwilling(x) -> Unwieldy(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) -> Unwieldy(x))\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Catacorner(x))\nDoomed(reiko) -> Catacorner(reiko)\n\nBullocky(reiko)\n\nBullocky(reiko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Adolph is pharisaic. Amber is not larval. Katharina is pharisaic. White people are minded. If someone is nigerian and excusable then they are not pharisaic. All minded, nigerian people are horrendous. All sporty people are horrendous. Young people are sporty. If Amber is larval then Amber is sporty. Adolph is not larval.", "logic": "\nPharisaic(adolph)\nnot Larval(amber)\nPharisaic(katharina)\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Minded(x))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) and Excusable(x) -> not Pharisaic(x))\nforall x (Minded(x) and Nigerian(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Sporty(x))\nLarval(amber) -> Sporty(amber)\n\nnot Larval(adolph)\n\nnot Larval(adolph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Joelly is wandering. Ingeborg is not congruous. Aliza is wandering. White people are conjoined. If someone is nethermost and soupy then they are not wandering. All conjoined, nethermost people are binominal. All iritic people are binominal. Young people are iritic. If Ingeborg is congruous then Ingeborg is iritic. Ingeborg is nethermost.", "logic": "\nWandering(joelly)\nnot Congruous(ingeborg)\nWandering(aliza)\nforall x (Binominal(x) -> Conjoined(x))\nforall x (Nethermost(x) and Soupy(x) -> not Wandering(x))\nforall x (Conjoined(x) and Nethermost(x) -> Binominal(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Binominal(x))\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> Iritic(x))\nCongruous(ingeborg) -> Iritic(ingeborg)\n\nNethermost(ingeborg)\n\nNethermost(ingeborg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Marna is petallike. Shelagh is not unexciting. Sheila is petallike. White people are luminous. If someone is expert and wishful then they are not petallike. All luminous, expert people are unyielding. All xcvi people are unyielding. Young people are xcvi. If Shelagh is unexciting then Shelagh is xcvi. Marna is not expert.", "logic": "\nPetallike(marna)\nnot Unexciting(shelagh)\nPetallike(sheila)\nforall x (Unyielding(x) -> Luminous(x))\nforall x (Expert(x) and Wishful(x) -> not Petallike(x))\nforall x (Luminous(x) and Expert(x) -> Unyielding(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Unyielding(x))\nforall x (Petallike(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nUnexciting(shelagh) -> Xcvi(shelagh)\n\nnot Expert(marna)\n\nnot Expert(marna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Nilson is aeolian. Jobina is not bunchy. Sela is aeolian. White people are anti. If someone is killing and sternal then they are not aeolian. All anti, killing people are unexampled. All yogic people are unexampled. Young people are yogic. If Jobina is bunchy then Jobina is yogic. Jobina is aeolian.", "logic": "\nAeolian(nilson)\nnot Bunchy(jobina)\nAeolian(sela)\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Anti(x))\nforall x (Killing(x) and Sternal(x) -> not Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Anti(x) and Killing(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Yogic(x))\nBunchy(jobina) -> Yogic(jobina)\n\nAeolian(jobina)\n\nAeolian(jobina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Darell is deepening. Darell is limiting. Darell is irreverent. Darell is structural. Michaella is deepening. Michaella is limiting. Michaella is crabby. Micheline is irreverent. Micheline is sinuate. Micheline is crabby. Elisa is abstemious. Elisa is limiting. Elisa is irreverent. Elisa is sinuate. Elisa is crabby. Elisa is structural. Rough, structural people are abstemious. If someone is abstemious and crabby then they are deepening. Cold, deepening people are structural. Cold, abstemious people are deepening. If someone is abstemious and deepening then they are irreverent. If Elisa is abstemious and Elisa is sinuate then Elisa is structural. Elisa is structural.", "logic": "\nDeepening(darell)\nLimiting(darell)\nIrreverent(darell)\nStructural(darell)\nDeepening(michaella)\nLimiting(michaella)\nCrabby(michaella)\nIrreverent(micheline)\nSinuate(micheline)\nCrabby(micheline)\nAbstemious(elisa)\nLimiting(elisa)\nIrreverent(elisa)\nSinuate(elisa)\nCrabby(elisa)\nStructural(elisa)\nforall x (Crabby(x) and Structural(x) -> Abstemious(x))\nforall x (Abstemious(x) and Crabby(x) -> Deepening(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) and Deepening(x) -> Structural(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) and Abstemious(x) -> Deepening(x))\nforall x (Abstemious(x) and Deepening(x) -> Irreverent(x))\nAbstemious(elisa) and Sinuate(elisa) -> Structural(elisa)\n\nStructural(elisa)\n\ntherefore Structural(elisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Desirae is ambrosian. Desirae is missional. Desirae is deific. Desirae is savage. Wheeler is ambrosian. Wheeler is missional. Wheeler is naval. Tandy is deific. Tandy is indie. Tandy is naval. Georgena is patristic. Georgena is missional. Georgena is deific. Georgena is indie. Georgena is naval. Georgena is savage. Rough, savage people are patristic. If someone is patristic and naval then they are ambrosian. Cold, ambrosian people are savage. Cold, patristic people are ambrosian. If someone is patristic and ambrosian then they are deific. If Georgena is patristic and Georgena is indie then Georgena is savage. Desirae is not savage.", "logic": "\nAmbrosian(desirae)\nMissional(desirae)\nDeific(desirae)\nSavage(desirae)\nAmbrosian(wheeler)\nMissional(wheeler)\nNaval(wheeler)\nDeific(tandy)\nIndie(tandy)\nNaval(tandy)\nPatristic(georgena)\nMissional(georgena)\nDeific(georgena)\nIndie(georgena)\nNaval(georgena)\nSavage(georgena)\nforall x (Naval(x) and Savage(x) -> Patristic(x))\nforall x (Patristic(x) and Naval(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Missional(x) and Ambrosian(x) -> Savage(x))\nforall x (Missional(x) and Patristic(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Patristic(x) and Ambrosian(x) -> Deific(x))\nPatristic(georgena) and Indie(georgena) -> Savage(georgena)\n\nnot Savage(desirae)\n\ntherefore Savage(desirae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Penelopa is despondent. Penelopa is regardant. Penelopa is stony. Penelopa is tractive. Otho is despondent. Otho is regardant. Otho is sullen. Gates is stony. Gates is mucinoid. Gates is sullen. Pete is unpotted. Pete is regardant. Pete is stony. Pete is mucinoid. Pete is sullen. Pete is tractive. Rough, tractive people are unpotted. If someone is unpotted and sullen then they are despondent. Cold, despondent people are tractive. Cold, unpotted people are despondent. If someone is unpotted and despondent then they are stony. If Pete is unpotted and Pete is mucinoid then Pete is tractive. Otho is tractive.", "logic": "\nDespondent(penelopa)\nRegardant(penelopa)\nStony(penelopa)\nTractive(penelopa)\nDespondent(otho)\nRegardant(otho)\nSullen(otho)\nStony(gates)\nMucinoid(gates)\nSullen(gates)\nUnpotted(pete)\nRegardant(pete)\nStony(pete)\nMucinoid(pete)\nSullen(pete)\nTractive(pete)\nforall x (Sullen(x) and Tractive(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) and Sullen(x) -> Despondent(x))\nforall x (Regardant(x) and Despondent(x) -> Tractive(x))\nforall x (Regardant(x) and Unpotted(x) -> Despondent(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) and Despondent(x) -> Stony(x))\nUnpotted(pete) and Mucinoid(pete) -> Tractive(pete)\n\nTractive(otho)\n\nRegardant(otho) and Despondent(otho) and forall x (Regardant(x) and Despondent(x) -> Tractive(x)) -> therefore Tractive(otho)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Octavia is inhibitory. Octavia is about. Octavia is agnostical. Octavia is glassy. Amber is inhibitory. Amber is about. Amber is rhymeless. Catha is agnostical. Catha is auriform. Catha is rhymeless. Winonah is likely. Winonah is about. Winonah is agnostical. Winonah is auriform. Winonah is rhymeless. Winonah is glassy. Rough, glassy people are likely. If someone is likely and rhymeless then they are inhibitory. Cold, inhibitory people are glassy. Cold, likely people are inhibitory. If someone is likely and inhibitory then they are agnostical. If Winonah is likely and Winonah is auriform then Winonah is glassy. Winonah is not inhibitory.", "logic": "\nInhibitory(octavia)\nAbout(octavia)\nAgnostical(octavia)\nGlassy(octavia)\nInhibitory(amber)\nAbout(amber)\nRhymeless(amber)\nAgnostical(catha)\nAuriform(catha)\nRhymeless(catha)\nLikely(winonah)\nAbout(winonah)\nAgnostical(winonah)\nAuriform(winonah)\nRhymeless(winonah)\nGlassy(winonah)\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) and Glassy(x) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) and Rhymeless(x) -> Inhibitory(x))\nforall x (About(x) and Inhibitory(x) -> Glassy(x))\nforall x (About(x) and Likely(x) -> Inhibitory(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) and Inhibitory(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nLikely(winonah) and Auriform(winonah) -> Glassy(winonah)\n\nnot Inhibitory(winonah)\n\nLikely(winonah) and Rhymeless(winonah) and forall x (Likely(x) and Rhymeless(x) -> Inhibitory(x)) -> therefore Inhibitory(winonah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Caritta is each. Caritta is linnean. Caritta is edgy. Caritta is evenhanded. Rebbecca is each. Rebbecca is linnean. Rebbecca is catoptric. Ottilie is edgy. Ottilie is brimfull. Ottilie is catoptric. Faun is stupefied. Faun is linnean. Faun is edgy. Faun is brimfull. Faun is catoptric. Faun is evenhanded. Rough, evenhanded people are stupefied. If someone is stupefied and catoptric then they are each. Cold, each people are evenhanded. Cold, stupefied people are each. If someone is stupefied and each then they are edgy. If Faun is stupefied and Faun is brimfull then Faun is evenhanded. Rebbecca is stupefied.", "logic": "\nEach(caritta)\nLinnean(caritta)\nEdgy(caritta)\nEvenhanded(caritta)\nEach(rebbecca)\nLinnean(rebbecca)\nCatoptric(rebbecca)\nEdgy(ottilie)\nBrimfull(ottilie)\nCatoptric(ottilie)\nStupefied(faun)\nLinnean(faun)\nEdgy(faun)\nBrimfull(faun)\nCatoptric(faun)\nEvenhanded(faun)\nforall x (Catoptric(x) and Evenhanded(x) -> Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) and Catoptric(x) -> Each(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) and Each(x) -> Evenhanded(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) and Stupefied(x) -> Each(x))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) and Each(x) -> Edgy(x))\nStupefied(faun) and Brimfull(faun) -> Evenhanded(faun)\n\nStupefied(rebbecca)\n\nLinnean(rebbecca) and Each(rebbecca) and forall x (Linnean(x) and Each(x) -> Evenhanded(x)) -> therefore Evenhanded(rebbecca) Catoptric(rebbecca) and Evenhanded(rebbecca) and forall x (Catoptric(x) and Evenhanded(x) -> Stupefied(x)) -> therefore Stupefied(rebbecca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Gertrude is stealthy. Gertrude is fictile. Gertrude is christian. Gertrude is senatorial. Judi is stealthy. Judi is fictile. Judi is echoless. Isaak is christian. Isaak is sarcastic. Isaak is echoless. Marcy is deceitful. Marcy is fictile. Marcy is christian. Marcy is sarcastic. Marcy is echoless. Marcy is senatorial. Rough, senatorial people are deceitful. If someone is deceitful and echoless then they are stealthy. Cold, stealthy people are senatorial. Cold, deceitful people are stealthy. If someone is deceitful and stealthy then they are christian. If Marcy is deceitful and Marcy is sarcastic then Marcy is senatorial. Judi is not deceitful.", "logic": "\nStealthy(gertrude)\nFictile(gertrude)\nChristian(gertrude)\nSenatorial(gertrude)\nStealthy(judi)\nFictile(judi)\nEcholess(judi)\nChristian(isaak)\nSarcastic(isaak)\nEcholess(isaak)\nDeceitful(marcy)\nFictile(marcy)\nChristian(marcy)\nSarcastic(marcy)\nEcholess(marcy)\nSenatorial(marcy)\nforall x (Echoless(x) and Senatorial(x) -> Deceitful(x))\nforall x (Deceitful(x) and Echoless(x) -> Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) and Stealthy(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) and Deceitful(x) -> Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Deceitful(x) and Stealthy(x) -> Christian(x))\nDeceitful(marcy) and Sarcastic(marcy) -> Senatorial(marcy)\n\nnot Deceitful(judi)\n\nFictile(judi) and Stealthy(judi) and forall x (Fictile(x) and Stealthy(x) -> Senatorial(x)) -> therefore Senatorial(judi) Echoless(judi) and Senatorial(judi) and forall x (Echoless(x) and Senatorial(x) -> Deceitful(x)) -> therefore Deceitful(judi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Durant is bivalent. Durant is recent. Durant is linnean. Durant is subhuman. Ioana is bivalent. Ioana is recent. Ioana is rotatory. Kostas is linnean. Kostas is lavish. Kostas is rotatory. Kacey is monthly. Kacey is recent. Kacey is linnean. Kacey is lavish. Kacey is rotatory. Kacey is subhuman. Rough, subhuman people are monthly. If someone is monthly and rotatory then they are bivalent. Cold, bivalent people are subhuman. Cold, monthly people are bivalent. If someone is monthly and bivalent then they are linnean. If Kacey is monthly and Kacey is lavish then Kacey is subhuman. Ioana is linnean.", "logic": "\nBivalent(durant)\nRecent(durant)\nLinnean(durant)\nSubhuman(durant)\nBivalent(ioana)\nRecent(ioana)\nRotatory(ioana)\nLinnean(kostas)\nLavish(kostas)\nRotatory(kostas)\nMonthly(kacey)\nRecent(kacey)\nLinnean(kacey)\nLavish(kacey)\nRotatory(kacey)\nSubhuman(kacey)\nforall x (Rotatory(x) and Subhuman(x) -> Monthly(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) and Rotatory(x) -> Bivalent(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Bivalent(x) -> Subhuman(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Monthly(x) -> Bivalent(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) and Bivalent(x) -> Linnean(x))\nMonthly(kacey) and Lavish(kacey) -> Subhuman(kacey)\n\nLinnean(ioana)\n\nRecent(ioana) and Bivalent(ioana) and forall x (Recent(x) and Bivalent(x) -> Subhuman(x)) -> therefore Subhuman(ioana) Rotatory(ioana) and Subhuman(ioana) and forall x (Rotatory(x) and Subhuman(x) -> Monthly(x)) -> therefore Monthly(ioana) Monthly(ioana) and Bivalent(ioana) and forall x (Monthly(x) and Bivalent(x) -> Linnean(x)) -> therefore Linnean(ioana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Laurice is slothful. Laurice is morbid. Laurice is eighteenth. Laurice is breeched. Cesar is slothful. Cesar is morbid. Cesar is eponymous. Ernesto is eighteenth. Ernesto is unarmoured. Ernesto is eponymous. Donnajean is sepulchral. Donnajean is morbid. Donnajean is eighteenth. Donnajean is unarmoured. Donnajean is eponymous. Donnajean is breeched. Rough, breeched people are sepulchral. If someone is sepulchral and eponymous then they are slothful. Cold, slothful people are breeched. Cold, sepulchral people are slothful. If someone is sepulchral and slothful then they are eighteenth. If Donnajean is sepulchral and Donnajean is unarmoured then Donnajean is breeched. Cesar is not eighteenth.", "logic": "\nSlothful(laurice)\nMorbid(laurice)\nEighteenth(laurice)\nBreeched(laurice)\nSlothful(cesar)\nMorbid(cesar)\nEponymous(cesar)\nEighteenth(ernesto)\nUnarmoured(ernesto)\nEponymous(ernesto)\nSepulchral(donnajean)\nMorbid(donnajean)\nEighteenth(donnajean)\nUnarmoured(donnajean)\nEponymous(donnajean)\nBreeched(donnajean)\nforall x (Eponymous(x) and Breeched(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Slothful(x))\nforall x (Morbid(x) and Slothful(x) -> Breeched(x))\nforall x (Morbid(x) and Sepulchral(x) -> Slothful(x))\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and Slothful(x) -> Eighteenth(x))\nSepulchral(donnajean) and Unarmoured(donnajean) -> Breeched(donnajean)\n\nnot Eighteenth(cesar)\n\nMorbid(cesar) and Slothful(cesar) and forall x (Morbid(x) and Slothful(x) -> Breeched(x)) -> therefore Breeched(cesar) Eponymous(cesar) and Breeched(cesar) and forall x (Eponymous(x) and Breeched(x) -> Sepulchral(x)) -> therefore Sepulchral(cesar) Sepulchral(cesar) and Slothful(cesar) and forall x (Sepulchral(x) and Slothful(x) -> Eighteenth(x)) -> therefore Eighteenth(cesar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Penelope is rewarding. Penelope is absolutist. Penelope is congealed. Penelope is frail. Charleen is rewarding. Charleen is absolutist. Charleen is mannerly. Kippy is congealed. Kippy is hifalutin. Kippy is mannerly. Redford is ripened. Redford is absolutist. Redford is congealed. Redford is hifalutin. Redford is mannerly. Redford is frail. Rough, frail people are ripened. If someone is ripened and mannerly then they are rewarding. Cold, rewarding people are frail. Cold, ripened people are rewarding. If someone is ripened and rewarding then they are congealed. If Redford is ripened and Redford is hifalutin then Redford is frail. Penelope is not ripened.", "logic": "\nRewarding(penelope)\nAbsolutist(penelope)\nCongealed(penelope)\nFrail(penelope)\nRewarding(charleen)\nAbsolutist(charleen)\nMannerly(charleen)\nCongealed(kippy)\nHifalutin(kippy)\nMannerly(kippy)\nRipened(redford)\nAbsolutist(redford)\nCongealed(redford)\nHifalutin(redford)\nMannerly(redford)\nFrail(redford)\nforall x (Mannerly(x) and Frail(x) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) and Mannerly(x) -> Rewarding(x))\nforall x (Absolutist(x) and Rewarding(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Absolutist(x) and Ripened(x) -> Rewarding(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) and Rewarding(x) -> Congealed(x))\nRipened(redford) and Hifalutin(redford) -> Frail(redford)\n\nnot Ripened(penelope)\n\nforall x (Mannerly(x) and Frail(x) -> Ripened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Roanna is germy. Roanna is tectonic. Roanna is halfway. Roanna is biogenic. Catie is germy. Catie is tectonic. Catie is copesettic. Luce is halfway. Luce is cantonal. Luce is copesettic. Alyss is altered. Alyss is tectonic. Alyss is halfway. Alyss is cantonal. Alyss is copesettic. Alyss is biogenic. Rough, biogenic people are altered. If someone is altered and copesettic then they are germy. Cold, germy people are biogenic. Cold, altered people are germy. If someone is altered and germy then they are halfway. If Alyss is altered and Alyss is cantonal then Alyss is biogenic. Luce is altered.", "logic": "\nGermy(roanna)\nTectonic(roanna)\nHalfway(roanna)\nBiogenic(roanna)\nGermy(catie)\nTectonic(catie)\nCopesettic(catie)\nHalfway(luce)\nCantonal(luce)\nCopesettic(luce)\nAltered(alyss)\nTectonic(alyss)\nHalfway(alyss)\nCantonal(alyss)\nCopesettic(alyss)\nBiogenic(alyss)\nforall x (Copesettic(x) and Biogenic(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) and Copesettic(x) -> Germy(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) and Germy(x) -> Biogenic(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) and Altered(x) -> Germy(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) and Germy(x) -> Halfway(x))\nAltered(alyss) and Cantonal(alyss) -> Biogenic(alyss)\n\nAltered(luce)\n\nforall x (Copesettic(x) and Biogenic(x) -> Altered(x)) <- forall x (Tectonic(x) and Germy(x) -> Biogenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Nani is echoing. Nani is pleochroic. Nani is automotive. Nani is reclusive. Nena is echoing. Nena is pleochroic. Nena is civilian. Marrissa is automotive. Marrissa is lesbian. Marrissa is civilian. Pamelina is conventual. Pamelina is pleochroic. Pamelina is automotive. Pamelina is lesbian. Pamelina is civilian. Pamelina is reclusive. Rough, reclusive people are conventual. If someone is conventual and civilian then they are echoing. Cold, echoing people are reclusive. Cold, conventual people are echoing. If someone is conventual and echoing then they are automotive. If Pamelina is conventual and Pamelina is lesbian then Pamelina is reclusive. Marrissa is not reclusive.", "logic": "\nEchoing(nani)\nPleochroic(nani)\nAutomotive(nani)\nReclusive(nani)\nEchoing(nena)\nPleochroic(nena)\nCivilian(nena)\nAutomotive(marrissa)\nLesbian(marrissa)\nCivilian(marrissa)\nConventual(pamelina)\nPleochroic(pamelina)\nAutomotive(pamelina)\nLesbian(pamelina)\nCivilian(pamelina)\nReclusive(pamelina)\nforall x (Civilian(x) and Reclusive(x) -> Conventual(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and Civilian(x) -> Echoing(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Echoing(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Conventual(x) -> Echoing(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and Echoing(x) -> Automotive(x))\nConventual(pamelina) and Lesbian(pamelina) -> Reclusive(pamelina)\n\nnot Reclusive(marrissa)\n\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Echoing(x) -> Reclusive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Sasha is allopathic. Sasha is injectable. Sasha is plummy. Sasha is stative. Mab is allopathic. Mab is injectable. Mab is knotted. Nevsa is plummy. Nevsa is kindled. Nevsa is knotted. Meridel is perfumed. Meridel is injectable. Meridel is plummy. Meridel is kindled. Meridel is knotted. Meridel is stative. Rough, stative people are perfumed. If someone is perfumed and knotted then they are allopathic. Cold, allopathic people are stative. Cold, perfumed people are allopathic. If someone is perfumed and allopathic then they are plummy. If Meridel is perfumed and Meridel is kindled then Meridel is stative. Nevsa is allopathic.", "logic": "\nAllopathic(sasha)\nInjectable(sasha)\nPlummy(sasha)\nStative(sasha)\nAllopathic(mab)\nInjectable(mab)\nKnotted(mab)\nPlummy(nevsa)\nKindled(nevsa)\nKnotted(nevsa)\nPerfumed(meridel)\nInjectable(meridel)\nPlummy(meridel)\nKindled(meridel)\nKnotted(meridel)\nStative(meridel)\nforall x (Knotted(x) and Stative(x) -> Perfumed(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) and Knotted(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Injectable(x) and Allopathic(x) -> Stative(x))\nforall x (Injectable(x) and Perfumed(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) and Allopathic(x) -> Plummy(x))\nPerfumed(meridel) and Kindled(meridel) -> Stative(meridel)\n\nAllopathic(nevsa)\n\nforall x (Perfumed(x) and Knotted(x) -> Allopathic(x)) <- forall x (Knotted(x) and Stative(x) -> Perfumed(x)) <- forall x (Injectable(x) and Allopathic(x) -> Stative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Tomasina is weak. Tomasina is eponymous. Tomasina is saccharine. Tomasina is arresting. Nada is weak. Nada is eponymous. Nada is unicameral. Major is saccharine. Major is doubled. Major is unicameral. Valeria is brickle. Valeria is eponymous. Valeria is saccharine. Valeria is doubled. Valeria is unicameral. Valeria is arresting. Rough, arresting people are brickle. If someone is brickle and unicameral then they are weak. Cold, weak people are arresting. Cold, brickle people are weak. If someone is brickle and weak then they are saccharine. If Valeria is brickle and Valeria is doubled then Valeria is arresting. Tomasina is not doubled.", "logic": "\nWeak(tomasina)\nEponymous(tomasina)\nSaccharine(tomasina)\nArresting(tomasina)\nWeak(nada)\nEponymous(nada)\nUnicameral(nada)\nSaccharine(major)\nDoubled(major)\nUnicameral(major)\nBrickle(valeria)\nEponymous(valeria)\nSaccharine(valeria)\nDoubled(valeria)\nUnicameral(valeria)\nArresting(valeria)\nforall x (Unicameral(x) and Arresting(x) -> Brickle(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) and Unicameral(x) -> Weak(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) and Weak(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) and Brickle(x) -> Weak(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) and Weak(x) -> Saccharine(x))\nBrickle(valeria) and Doubled(valeria) -> Arresting(valeria)\n\nnot Doubled(tomasina)\n\nnot Doubled(tomasina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Leona is larger. Leona is radiating. Leona is surficial. Leona is alkalic. Johnathan is larger. Johnathan is radiating. Johnathan is arithmetic. Barnabe is surficial. Barnabe is muscovite. Barnabe is arithmetic. Gerhardt is follicular. Gerhardt is radiating. Gerhardt is surficial. Gerhardt is muscovite. Gerhardt is arithmetic. Gerhardt is alkalic. Rough, alkalic people are follicular. If someone is follicular and arithmetic then they are larger. Cold, larger people are alkalic. Cold, follicular people are larger. If someone is follicular and larger then they are surficial. If Gerhardt is follicular and Gerhardt is muscovite then Gerhardt is alkalic. Barnabe is radiating.", "logic": "\nLarger(leona)\nRadiating(leona)\nSurficial(leona)\nAlkalic(leona)\nLarger(johnathan)\nRadiating(johnathan)\nArithmetic(johnathan)\nSurficial(barnabe)\nMuscovite(barnabe)\nArithmetic(barnabe)\nFollicular(gerhardt)\nRadiating(gerhardt)\nSurficial(gerhardt)\nMuscovite(gerhardt)\nArithmetic(gerhardt)\nAlkalic(gerhardt)\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) and Alkalic(x) -> Follicular(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Arithmetic(x) -> Larger(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Larger(x) -> Alkalic(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Follicular(x) -> Larger(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Larger(x) -> Surficial(x))\nFollicular(gerhardt) and Muscovite(gerhardt) -> Alkalic(gerhardt)\n\nRadiating(barnabe)\n\nRadiating(barnabe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Jordana is incredible. Jordana is algid. Jordana is unburdened. Jordana is allogamous. Eilis is incredible. Eilis is algid. Eilis is nonmoving. Annmaria is unburdened. Annmaria is palish. Annmaria is nonmoving. Andreas is disdainful. Andreas is algid. Andreas is unburdened. Andreas is palish. Andreas is nonmoving. Andreas is allogamous. Rough, allogamous people are disdainful. If someone is disdainful and nonmoving then they are incredible. Cold, incredible people are allogamous. Cold, disdainful people are incredible. If someone is disdainful and incredible then they are unburdened. If Andreas is disdainful and Andreas is palish then Andreas is allogamous. Eilis is not palish.", "logic": "\nIncredible(jordana)\nAlgid(jordana)\nUnburdened(jordana)\nAllogamous(jordana)\nIncredible(eilis)\nAlgid(eilis)\nNonmoving(eilis)\nUnburdened(annmaria)\nPalish(annmaria)\nNonmoving(annmaria)\nDisdainful(andreas)\nAlgid(andreas)\nUnburdened(andreas)\nPalish(andreas)\nNonmoving(andreas)\nAllogamous(andreas)\nforall x (Nonmoving(x) and Allogamous(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Disdainful(x) and Nonmoving(x) -> Incredible(x))\nforall x (Algid(x) and Incredible(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nforall x (Algid(x) and Disdainful(x) -> Incredible(x))\nforall x (Disdainful(x) and Incredible(x) -> Unburdened(x))\nDisdainful(andreas) and Palish(andreas) -> Allogamous(andreas)\n\nnot Palish(eilis)\n\nnot Palish(eilis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Natalee is contextual. Natalee is monogynous. Natalee is curtal. Natalee is remedial. Brewer is contextual. Brewer is monogynous. Brewer is mensural. Marris is curtal. Marris is torulose. Marris is mensural. Suzzy is mercenary. Suzzy is monogynous. Suzzy is curtal. Suzzy is torulose. Suzzy is mensural. Suzzy is remedial. Rough, remedial people are mercenary. If someone is mercenary and mensural then they are contextual. Cold, contextual people are remedial. Cold, mercenary people are contextual. If someone is mercenary and contextual then they are curtal. If Suzzy is mercenary and Suzzy is torulose then Suzzy is remedial. Natalee is mensural.", "logic": "\nContextual(natalee)\nMonogynous(natalee)\nCurtal(natalee)\nRemedial(natalee)\nContextual(brewer)\nMonogynous(brewer)\nMensural(brewer)\nCurtal(marris)\nTorulose(marris)\nMensural(marris)\nMercenary(suzzy)\nMonogynous(suzzy)\nCurtal(suzzy)\nTorulose(suzzy)\nMensural(suzzy)\nRemedial(suzzy)\nforall x (Mensural(x) and Remedial(x) -> Mercenary(x))\nforall x (Mercenary(x) and Mensural(x) -> Contextual(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) and Contextual(x) -> Remedial(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) and Mercenary(x) -> Contextual(x))\nforall x (Mercenary(x) and Contextual(x) -> Curtal(x))\nMercenary(suzzy) and Torulose(suzzy) -> Remedial(suzzy)\n\nMensural(natalee)\n\nMensural(natalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Kora is sodding. Kora is corrugated. Kora is objective. Kora is ahead. Cathie is corrugated. Cathie is objective. Cathie is eurasian. Cathie is preferable. Vasilis is eurasian. Vasilis is preferable. Vasilis is ahead. Vasilis is polygonal. All ahead, corrugated things are objective. If something is polygonal then it is corrugated. Nice, ahead things are eurasian. If Kora is eurasian then Kora is ahead. If something is corrugated and objective then it is sodding. All objective, ahead things are polygonal. If something is sodding and ahead then it is objective. If Kora is preferable and Kora is polygonal then Kora is ahead. Vasilis is ahead.", "logic": "\nSodding(kora)\nCorrugated(kora)\nObjective(kora)\nAhead(kora)\nCorrugated(cathie)\nObjective(cathie)\nEurasian(cathie)\nPreferable(cathie)\nEurasian(vasilis)\nPreferable(vasilis)\nAhead(vasilis)\nPolygonal(vasilis)\nforall x (Ahead(x) and Corrugated(x) -> Objective(x))\nforall x (Polygonal(x) -> Corrugated(x))\nforall x (Objective(x) and Ahead(x) -> Eurasian(x))\nEurasian(kora) -> Ahead(kora)\nforall x (Corrugated(x) and Objective(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Objective(x) and Ahead(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Ahead(x) -> Objective(x))\nPreferable(kora) and Polygonal(kora) -> Ahead(kora)\n\nAhead(vasilis)\n\ntherefore Ahead(vasilis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Lucius is bulgy. Lucius is sepulchral. Lucius is torulose. Lucius is inimical. Darrin is sepulchral. Darrin is torulose. Darrin is cambrian. Darrin is yeatsian. Rosita is cambrian. Rosita is yeatsian. Rosita is inimical. Rosita is buzzing. All inimical, sepulchral things are torulose. If something is buzzing then it is sepulchral. Nice, inimical things are cambrian. If Lucius is cambrian then Lucius is inimical. If something is sepulchral and torulose then it is bulgy. All torulose, inimical things are buzzing. If something is bulgy and inimical then it is torulose. If Lucius is yeatsian and Lucius is buzzing then Lucius is inimical. Rosita is not inimical.", "logic": "\nBulgy(lucius)\nSepulchral(lucius)\nTorulose(lucius)\nInimical(lucius)\nSepulchral(darrin)\nTorulose(darrin)\nCambrian(darrin)\nYeatsian(darrin)\nCambrian(rosita)\nYeatsian(rosita)\nInimical(rosita)\nBuzzing(rosita)\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Sepulchral(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Buzzing(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nforall x (Torulose(x) and Inimical(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nCambrian(lucius) -> Inimical(lucius)\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and Torulose(x) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Torulose(x) and Inimical(x) -> Buzzing(x))\nforall x (Bulgy(x) and Inimical(x) -> Torulose(x))\nYeatsian(lucius) and Buzzing(lucius) -> Inimical(lucius)\n\nnot Inimical(rosita)\n\ntherefore Inimical(rosita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Chalmers is sinhalese. Chalmers is bulbed. Chalmers is boffo. Chalmers is notional. Leoline is bulbed. Leoline is boffo. Leoline is cryogenic. Leoline is plenary. Joelynn is cryogenic. Joelynn is plenary. Joelynn is notional. Joelynn is lusterless. All notional, bulbed things are boffo. If something is lusterless then it is bulbed. Nice, notional things are cryogenic. If Chalmers is cryogenic then Chalmers is notional. If something is bulbed and boffo then it is sinhalese. All boffo, notional things are lusterless. If something is sinhalese and notional then it is boffo. If Chalmers is plenary and Chalmers is lusterless then Chalmers is notional. Leoline is sinhalese.", "logic": "\nSinhalese(chalmers)\nBulbed(chalmers)\nBoffo(chalmers)\nNotional(chalmers)\nBulbed(leoline)\nBoffo(leoline)\nCryogenic(leoline)\nPlenary(leoline)\nCryogenic(joelynn)\nPlenary(joelynn)\nNotional(joelynn)\nLusterless(joelynn)\nforall x (Notional(x) and Bulbed(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Bulbed(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) and Notional(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\nCryogenic(chalmers) -> Notional(chalmers)\nforall x (Bulbed(x) and Boffo(x) -> Sinhalese(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) and Notional(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Notional(x) -> Boffo(x))\nPlenary(chalmers) and Lusterless(chalmers) -> Notional(chalmers)\n\nSinhalese(leoline)\n\nBulbed(leoline) and Boffo(leoline) and forall x (Bulbed(x) and Boffo(x) -> Sinhalese(x)) -> therefore Sinhalese(leoline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Pollyanna is homey. Pollyanna is harmonic. Pollyanna is potholed. Pollyanna is centered. Ethelyn is harmonic. Ethelyn is potholed. Ethelyn is reddened. Ethelyn is comate. Agatha is reddened. Agatha is comate. Agatha is centered. Agatha is tantamount. All centered, harmonic things are potholed. If something is tantamount then it is harmonic. Nice, centered things are reddened. If Pollyanna is reddened then Pollyanna is centered. If something is harmonic and potholed then it is homey. All potholed, centered things are tantamount. If something is homey and centered then it is potholed. If Pollyanna is comate and Pollyanna is tantamount then Pollyanna is centered. Ethelyn is not homey.", "logic": "\nHomey(pollyanna)\nHarmonic(pollyanna)\nPotholed(pollyanna)\nCentered(pollyanna)\nHarmonic(ethelyn)\nPotholed(ethelyn)\nReddened(ethelyn)\nComate(ethelyn)\nReddened(agatha)\nComate(agatha)\nCentered(agatha)\nTantamount(agatha)\nforall x (Centered(x) and Harmonic(x) -> Potholed(x))\nforall x (Tantamount(x) -> Harmonic(x))\nforall x (Potholed(x) and Centered(x) -> Reddened(x))\nReddened(pollyanna) -> Centered(pollyanna)\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Potholed(x) -> Homey(x))\nforall x (Potholed(x) and Centered(x) -> Tantamount(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) and Centered(x) -> Potholed(x))\nComate(pollyanna) and Tantamount(pollyanna) -> Centered(pollyanna)\n\nnot Homey(ethelyn)\n\nHarmonic(ethelyn) and Potholed(ethelyn) and forall x (Harmonic(x) and Potholed(x) -> Homey(x)) -> therefore Homey(ethelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Valina is weather. Valina is hypoactive. Valina is impolitic. Valina is swollen. Jaynell is hypoactive. Jaynell is impolitic. Jaynell is tusked. Jaynell is dyspnoeic. Vera is tusked. Vera is dyspnoeic. Vera is swollen. Vera is definitive. All swollen, hypoactive things are impolitic. If something is definitive then it is hypoactive. Nice, swollen things are tusked. If Valina is tusked then Valina is swollen. If something is hypoactive and impolitic then it is weather. All impolitic, swollen things are definitive. If something is weather and swollen then it is impolitic. If Valina is dyspnoeic and Valina is definitive then Valina is swollen. Vera is impolitic.", "logic": "\nWeather(valina)\nHypoactive(valina)\nImpolitic(valina)\nSwollen(valina)\nHypoactive(jaynell)\nImpolitic(jaynell)\nTusked(jaynell)\nDyspnoeic(jaynell)\nTusked(vera)\nDyspnoeic(vera)\nSwollen(vera)\nDefinitive(vera)\nforall x (Swollen(x) and Hypoactive(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nforall x (Definitive(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Impolitic(x) and Swollen(x) -> Tusked(x))\nTusked(valina) -> Swollen(valina)\nforall x (Hypoactive(x) and Impolitic(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Impolitic(x) and Swollen(x) -> Definitive(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) and Swollen(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nDyspnoeic(valina) and Definitive(valina) -> Swollen(valina)\n\nImpolitic(vera)\n\nDefinitive(vera) and forall x (Definitive(x) -> Hypoactive(x)) -> therefore Hypoactive(vera) Swollen(vera) and Hypoactive(vera) and forall x (Swollen(x) and Hypoactive(x) -> Impolitic(x)) -> therefore Impolitic(vera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Blanch is democratic. Blanch is frilly. Blanch is unstudied. Blanch is cyprinoid. Catherin is frilly. Catherin is unstudied. Catherin is avellan. Catherin is stellate. Gloriane is avellan. Gloriane is stellate. Gloriane is cyprinoid. Gloriane is diminuendo. All cyprinoid, frilly things are unstudied. If something is diminuendo then it is frilly. Nice, cyprinoid things are avellan. If Blanch is avellan then Blanch is cyprinoid. If something is frilly and unstudied then it is democratic. All unstudied, cyprinoid things are diminuendo. If something is democratic and cyprinoid then it is unstudied. If Blanch is stellate and Blanch is diminuendo then Blanch is cyprinoid. Gloriane is not unstudied.", "logic": "\nDemocratic(blanch)\nFrilly(blanch)\nUnstudied(blanch)\nCyprinoid(blanch)\nFrilly(catherin)\nUnstudied(catherin)\nAvellan(catherin)\nStellate(catherin)\nAvellan(gloriane)\nStellate(gloriane)\nCyprinoid(gloriane)\nDiminuendo(gloriane)\nforall x (Cyprinoid(x) and Frilly(x) -> Unstudied(x))\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Frilly(x))\nforall x (Unstudied(x) and Cyprinoid(x) -> Avellan(x))\nAvellan(blanch) -> Cyprinoid(blanch)\nforall x (Frilly(x) and Unstudied(x) -> Democratic(x))\nforall x (Unstudied(x) and Cyprinoid(x) -> Diminuendo(x))\nforall x (Democratic(x) and Cyprinoid(x) -> Unstudied(x))\nStellate(blanch) and Diminuendo(blanch) -> Cyprinoid(blanch)\n\nnot Unstudied(gloriane)\n\nDiminuendo(gloriane) and forall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Frilly(x)) -> therefore Frilly(gloriane) Cyprinoid(gloriane) and Frilly(gloriane) and forall x (Cyprinoid(x) and Frilly(x) -> Unstudied(x)) -> therefore Unstudied(gloriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Felice is distrait. Felice is forte. Felice is exoergic. Felice is lordly. Inci is forte. Inci is exoergic. Inci is anguillan. Inci is ungoverned. Hally is anguillan. Hally is ungoverned. Hally is lordly. Hally is iranian. All lordly, forte things are exoergic. If something is iranian then it is forte. Nice, lordly things are anguillan. If Felice is anguillan then Felice is lordly. If something is forte and exoergic then it is distrait. All exoergic, lordly things are iranian. If something is distrait and lordly then it is exoergic. If Felice is ungoverned and Felice is iranian then Felice is lordly. Hally is distrait.", "logic": "\nDistrait(felice)\nForte(felice)\nExoergic(felice)\nLordly(felice)\nForte(inci)\nExoergic(inci)\nAnguillan(inci)\nUngoverned(inci)\nAnguillan(hally)\nUngoverned(hally)\nLordly(hally)\nIranian(hally)\nforall x (Lordly(x) and Forte(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Iranian(x) -> Forte(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) and Lordly(x) -> Anguillan(x))\nAnguillan(felice) -> Lordly(felice)\nforall x (Forte(x) and Exoergic(x) -> Distrait(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) and Lordly(x) -> Iranian(x))\nforall x (Distrait(x) and Lordly(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nUngoverned(felice) and Iranian(felice) -> Lordly(felice)\n\nDistrait(hally)\n\nIranian(hally) and forall x (Iranian(x) -> Forte(x)) -> therefore Forte(hally) Iranian(hally) and forall x (Iranian(x) -> Forte(x)) -> therefore Forte(hally) Lordly(hally) and Forte(hally) and forall x (Lordly(x) and Forte(x) -> Exoergic(x)) -> therefore Exoergic(hally) Forte(hally) and Exoergic(hally) and forall x (Forte(x) and Exoergic(x) -> Distrait(x)) -> therefore Distrait(hally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Sharie is offending. Sharie is biggish. Sharie is biradial. Sharie is dermal. Hans is biggish. Hans is biradial. Hans is incased. Hans is eery. Carlene is incased. Carlene is eery. Carlene is dermal. Carlene is assessable. All dermal, biggish things are biradial. If something is assessable then it is biggish. Nice, dermal things are incased. If Sharie is incased then Sharie is dermal. If something is biggish and biradial then it is offending. All biradial, dermal things are assessable. If something is offending and dermal then it is biradial. If Sharie is eery and Sharie is assessable then Sharie is dermal. Carlene is not offending.", "logic": "\nOffending(sharie)\nBiggish(sharie)\nBiradial(sharie)\nDermal(sharie)\nBiggish(hans)\nBiradial(hans)\nIncased(hans)\nEery(hans)\nIncased(carlene)\nEery(carlene)\nDermal(carlene)\nAssessable(carlene)\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Biggish(x) -> Biradial(x))\nforall x (Assessable(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Biradial(x) and Dermal(x) -> Incased(x))\nIncased(sharie) -> Dermal(sharie)\nforall x (Biggish(x) and Biradial(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Biradial(x) and Dermal(x) -> Assessable(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) and Dermal(x) -> Biradial(x))\nEery(sharie) and Assessable(sharie) -> Dermal(sharie)\n\nnot Offending(carlene)\n\nAssessable(carlene) and forall x (Assessable(x) -> Biggish(x)) -> therefore Biggish(carlene) Assessable(carlene) and forall x (Assessable(x) -> Biggish(x)) -> therefore Biggish(carlene) Dermal(carlene) and Biggish(carlene) and forall x (Dermal(x) and Biggish(x) -> Biradial(x)) -> therefore Biradial(carlene) Biggish(carlene) and Biradial(carlene) and forall x (Biggish(x) and Biradial(x) -> Offending(x)) -> therefore Offending(carlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Nariko is unhardened. Nariko is satirical. Nariko is broad. Nariko is utilised. Irena is satirical. Irena is broad. Irena is hurt. Irena is inerrable. Erena is hurt. Erena is inerrable. Erena is utilised. Erena is lenten. All utilised, satirical things are broad. If something is lenten then it is satirical. Nice, utilised things are hurt. If Nariko is hurt then Nariko is utilised. If something is satirical and broad then it is unhardened. All broad, utilised things are lenten. If something is unhardened and utilised then it is broad. If Nariko is inerrable and Nariko is lenten then Nariko is utilised. Irena is not lenten.", "logic": "\nUnhardened(nariko)\nSatirical(nariko)\nBroad(nariko)\nUtilised(nariko)\nSatirical(irena)\nBroad(irena)\nHurt(irena)\nInerrable(irena)\nHurt(erena)\nInerrable(erena)\nUtilised(erena)\nLenten(erena)\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Satirical(x) -> Broad(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) -> Satirical(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) and Utilised(x) -> Hurt(x))\nHurt(nariko) -> Utilised(nariko)\nforall x (Satirical(x) and Broad(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) and Utilised(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) and Utilised(x) -> Broad(x))\nInerrable(nariko) and Lenten(nariko) -> Utilised(nariko)\n\nnot Lenten(irena)\n\nforall x (Broad(x) and Utilised(x) -> Lenten(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Kira is vatical. Kira is beastly. Kira is undesigned. Kira is plaguey. Moise is beastly. Moise is undesigned. Moise is twinkling. Moise is oxonian. Konstanze is twinkling. Konstanze is oxonian. Konstanze is plaguey. Konstanze is parted. All plaguey, beastly things are undesigned. If something is parted then it is beastly. Nice, plaguey things are twinkling. If Kira is twinkling then Kira is plaguey. If something is beastly and undesigned then it is vatical. All undesigned, plaguey things are parted. If something is vatical and plaguey then it is undesigned. If Kira is oxonian and Kira is parted then Kira is plaguey. Moise is plaguey.", "logic": "\nVatical(kira)\nBeastly(kira)\nUndesigned(kira)\nPlaguey(kira)\nBeastly(moise)\nUndesigned(moise)\nTwinkling(moise)\nOxonian(moise)\nTwinkling(konstanze)\nOxonian(konstanze)\nPlaguey(konstanze)\nParted(konstanze)\nforall x (Plaguey(x) and Beastly(x) -> Undesigned(x))\nforall x (Parted(x) -> Beastly(x))\nforall x (Undesigned(x) and Plaguey(x) -> Twinkling(x))\nTwinkling(kira) -> Plaguey(kira)\nforall x (Beastly(x) and Undesigned(x) -> Vatical(x))\nforall x (Undesigned(x) and Plaguey(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Vatical(x) and Plaguey(x) -> Undesigned(x))\nOxonian(kira) and Parted(kira) -> Plaguey(kira)\n\nPlaguey(moise)\n\nPlaguey(moise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Isabella is appointive. Dorotea is tested. Elsbeth is tested. If something is tested then it is smoked. Smart, oleaceous things are collegial. If something is tested then it is probatory. All smoked things are appointive. If Dorotea is oleaceous and Dorotea is dantean then Dorotea is collegial. Cold things are dantean. Isabella is appointive.", "logic": "\nAppointive(isabella)\nTested(dorotea)\nTested(elsbeth)\nforall x (Tested(x) -> Smoked(x))\nforall x (Tested(x) and Oleaceous(x) -> Collegial(x))\nforall x (Tested(x) -> Probatory(x))\nforall x (Smoked(x) -> Appointive(x))\nOleaceous(dorotea) and Dantean(dorotea) -> Collegial(dorotea)\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Dantean(x))\n\nAppointive(isabella)\n\ntherefore Appointive(isabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Lyndsie is thudding. Charleen is aggressive. Melissa is aggressive. If something is aggressive then it is endodontic. Smart, creditable things are tottering. If something is aggressive then it is catchy. All endodontic things are thudding. If Charleen is creditable and Charleen is ruritanian then Charleen is tottering. Cold things are ruritanian. Charleen is not aggressive.", "logic": "\nThudding(lyndsie)\nAggressive(charleen)\nAggressive(melissa)\nforall x (Aggressive(x) -> Endodontic(x))\nforall x (Aggressive(x) and Creditable(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Aggressive(x) -> Catchy(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) -> Thudding(x))\nCreditable(charleen) and Ruritanian(charleen) -> Tottering(charleen)\nforall x (Thudding(x) -> Ruritanian(x))\n\nnot Aggressive(charleen)\n\ntherefore Aggressive(charleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Wiatt is surprised. Vitoria is northern. Dunc is northern. If something is northern then it is harmless. Smart, beery things are allomerous. If something is northern then it is spiderly. All harmless things are surprised. If Vitoria is beery and Vitoria is exposed then Vitoria is allomerous. Cold things are exposed. Vitoria is harmless.", "logic": "\nSurprised(wiatt)\nNorthern(vitoria)\nNorthern(dunc)\nforall x (Northern(x) -> Harmless(x))\nforall x (Northern(x) and Beery(x) -> Allomerous(x))\nforall x (Northern(x) -> Spiderly(x))\nforall x (Harmless(x) -> Surprised(x))\nBeery(vitoria) and Exposed(vitoria) -> Allomerous(vitoria)\nforall x (Surprised(x) -> Exposed(x))\n\nHarmless(vitoria)\n\nNorthern(vitoria) and forall x (Northern(x) -> Harmless(x)) -> therefore Harmless(vitoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Luis is bifocal. Amara is scalable. Lucio is scalable. If something is scalable then it is orthodox. Smart, attainable things are defiled. If something is scalable then it is preanal. All orthodox things are bifocal. If Amara is attainable and Amara is loath then Amara is defiled. Cold things are loath. Amara is not preanal.", "logic": "\nBifocal(luis)\nScalable(amara)\nScalable(lucio)\nforall x (Scalable(x) -> Orthodox(x))\nforall x (Scalable(x) and Attainable(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Scalable(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Orthodox(x) -> Bifocal(x))\nAttainable(amara) and Loath(amara) -> Defiled(amara)\nforall x (Bifocal(x) -> Loath(x))\n\nnot Preanal(amara)\n\nScalable(amara) and forall x (Scalable(x) -> Preanal(x)) -> therefore Preanal(amara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Jeremy is abulic. Dudley is begrimed. Corby is begrimed. If something is begrimed then it is foaming. Smart, silken things are avian. If something is begrimed then it is brut. All foaming things are abulic. If Dudley is silken and Dudley is precative then Dudley is avian. Cold things are precative. Corby is abulic.", "logic": "\nAbulic(jeremy)\nBegrimed(dudley)\nBegrimed(corby)\nforall x (Begrimed(x) -> Foaming(x))\nforall x (Begrimed(x) and Silken(x) -> Avian(x))\nforall x (Begrimed(x) -> Brut(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Abulic(x))\nSilken(dudley) and Precative(dudley) -> Avian(dudley)\nforall x (Abulic(x) -> Precative(x))\n\nAbulic(corby)\n\nBegrimed(corby) and forall x (Begrimed(x) -> Foaming(x)) -> therefore Foaming(corby) Foaming(corby) and forall x (Foaming(x) -> Abulic(x)) -> therefore Abulic(corby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Jessee is neglectful. Jeralee is styptic. Angeline is styptic. If something is styptic then it is uncurled. Smart, flattering things are stovepiped. If something is styptic then it is truant. All uncurled things are neglectful. If Jeralee is flattering and Jeralee is fifteen then Jeralee is stovepiped. Cold things are fifteen. Angeline is not neglectful.", "logic": "\nNeglectful(jessee)\nStyptic(jeralee)\nStyptic(angeline)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Uncurled(x))\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Flattering(x) -> Stovepiped(x))\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Truant(x))\nforall x (Uncurled(x) -> Neglectful(x))\nFlattering(jeralee) and Fifteen(jeralee) -> Stovepiped(jeralee)\nforall x (Neglectful(x) -> Fifteen(x))\n\nnot Neglectful(angeline)\n\nStyptic(angeline) and forall x (Styptic(x) -> Uncurled(x)) -> therefore Uncurled(angeline) Uncurled(angeline) and forall x (Uncurled(x) -> Neglectful(x)) -> therefore Neglectful(angeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Levi is chromatic. Mugsy is sickening. Alisun is sickening. If something is sickening then it is umteen. Smart, bowery things are unmanly. If something is sickening then it is riotous. All umteen things are chromatic. If Mugsy is bowery and Mugsy is eolithic then Mugsy is unmanly. Cold things are eolithic. Alisun is eolithic.", "logic": "\nChromatic(levi)\nSickening(mugsy)\nSickening(alisun)\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Umteen(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Bowery(x) -> Unmanly(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Riotous(x))\nforall x (Umteen(x) -> Chromatic(x))\nBowery(mugsy) and Eolithic(mugsy) -> Unmanly(mugsy)\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Eolithic(x))\n\nEolithic(alisun)\n\nSickening(alisun) and forall x (Sickening(x) -> Umteen(x)) -> therefore Umteen(alisun) Umteen(alisun) and forall x (Umteen(x) -> Chromatic(x)) -> therefore Chromatic(alisun) Chromatic(alisun) and forall x (Chromatic(x) -> Eolithic(x)) -> therefore Eolithic(alisun)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Riccardo is dodgy. Laurent is homeward. Mady is homeward. If something is homeward then it is published. Smart, pianistic things are appareled. If something is homeward then it is stentorian. All published things are dodgy. If Laurent is pianistic and Laurent is prisonlike then Laurent is appareled. Cold things are prisonlike. Mady is not prisonlike.", "logic": "\nDodgy(riccardo)\nHomeward(laurent)\nHomeward(mady)\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Published(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) and Pianistic(x) -> Appareled(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Stentorian(x))\nforall x (Published(x) -> Dodgy(x))\nPianistic(laurent) and Prisonlike(laurent) -> Appareled(laurent)\nforall x (Dodgy(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\n\nnot Prisonlike(mady)\n\nHomeward(mady) and forall x (Homeward(x) -> Published(x)) -> therefore Published(mady) Published(mady) and forall x (Published(x) -> Dodgy(x)) -> therefore Dodgy(mady) Dodgy(mady) and forall x (Dodgy(x) -> Prisonlike(x)) -> therefore Prisonlike(mady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Lenny is cadenced. Arlen is oscine. Alvina is oscine. If something is oscine then it is gardant. Smart, victimised things are singsong. If something is oscine then it is academic. All gardant things are cadenced. If Arlen is victimised and Arlen is present then Arlen is singsong. Cold things are present. Arlen is not singsong.", "logic": "\nCadenced(lenny)\nOscine(arlen)\nOscine(alvina)\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Gardant(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) and Victimised(x) -> Singsong(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Academic(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> Cadenced(x))\nVictimised(arlen) and Present(arlen) -> Singsong(arlen)\nforall x (Cadenced(x) -> Present(x))\n\nnot Singsong(arlen)\n\nforall x (Oscine(x) and Victimised(x) -> Singsong(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Wolfy is pukka. Merrilee is atrophied. Quinta is atrophied. If something is atrophied then it is twisting. Smart, unpointed things are russet. If something is atrophied then it is noticeable. All twisting things are pukka. If Merrilee is unpointed and Merrilee is ranging then Merrilee is russet. Cold things are ranging. Wolfy is russet.", "logic": "\nPukka(wolfy)\nAtrophied(merrilee)\nAtrophied(quinta)\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Twisting(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and Unpointed(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Noticeable(x))\nforall x (Twisting(x) -> Pukka(x))\nUnpointed(merrilee) and Ranging(merrilee) -> Russet(merrilee)\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Ranging(x))\n\nRusset(wolfy)\n\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and Unpointed(x) -> Russet(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Valida is beaklike. Zelig is engaging. Theodoric is engaging. If something is engaging then it is estimable. Smart, conforming things are bronchitic. If something is engaging then it is omissive. All estimable things are beaklike. If Zelig is conforming and Zelig is wolfish then Zelig is bronchitic. Cold things are wolfish. Theodoric is not bronchitic.", "logic": "\nBeaklike(valida)\nEngaging(zelig)\nEngaging(theodoric)\nforall x (Engaging(x) -> Estimable(x))\nforall x (Engaging(x) and Conforming(x) -> Bronchitic(x))\nforall x (Engaging(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Estimable(x) -> Beaklike(x))\nConforming(zelig) and Wolfish(zelig) -> Bronchitic(zelig)\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Wolfish(x))\n\nnot Bronchitic(theodoric)\n\nforall x (Engaging(x) and Conforming(x) -> Bronchitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Zane is kooky. Davidde is frowning. Emyle is frowning. If something is frowning then it is carbonous. Smart, woozy things are porous. If something is frowning then it is patronised. All carbonous things are kooky. If Davidde is woozy and Davidde is mindless then Davidde is porous. Cold things are mindless. Zane is patronised.", "logic": "\nKooky(zane)\nFrowning(davidde)\nFrowning(emyle)\nforall x (Frowning(x) -> Carbonous(x))\nforall x (Frowning(x) and Woozy(x) -> Porous(x))\nforall x (Frowning(x) -> Patronised(x))\nforall x (Carbonous(x) -> Kooky(x))\nWoozy(davidde) and Mindless(davidde) -> Porous(davidde)\nforall x (Kooky(x) -> Mindless(x))\n\nPatronised(zane)\n\nforall x (Frowning(x) -> Patronised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Garnette is legato. Lucky is hoggish. Nickey is hoggish. If something is hoggish then it is continual. Smart, surrogate things are danceable. If something is hoggish then it is bibliotic. All continual things are legato. If Lucky is surrogate and Lucky is broad then Lucky is danceable. Cold things are broad. Nickey is not surrogate.", "logic": "\nLegato(garnette)\nHoggish(lucky)\nHoggish(nickey)\nforall x (Hoggish(x) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Hoggish(x) and Surrogate(x) -> Danceable(x))\nforall x (Hoggish(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Continual(x) -> Legato(x))\nSurrogate(lucky) and Broad(lucky) -> Danceable(lucky)\nforall x (Legato(x) -> Broad(x))\n\nnot Surrogate(nickey)\n\nnot Surrogate(nickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Mick is cognizant. Zarla is creole. Caria is creole. If something is creole then it is ruinous. Smart, protean things are undeserved. If something is creole then it is potty. All ruinous things are cognizant. If Zarla is protean and Zarla is overblown then Zarla is undeserved. Cold things are overblown. Mick is creole.", "logic": "\nCognizant(mick)\nCreole(zarla)\nCreole(caria)\nforall x (Creole(x) -> Ruinous(x))\nforall x (Creole(x) and Protean(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Creole(x) -> Potty(x))\nforall x (Ruinous(x) -> Cognizant(x))\nProtean(zarla) and Overblown(zarla) -> Undeserved(zarla)\nforall x (Cognizant(x) -> Overblown(x))\n\nCreole(mick)\n\nCreole(mick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Alayne is wheeled. Thomasin is placating. Teodoro is placating. If something is placating then it is darkish. Smart, excellent things are remedial. If something is placating then it is digestive. All darkish things are wheeled. If Thomasin is excellent and Thomasin is botryoidal then Thomasin is remedial. Cold things are botryoidal. Thomasin is not excellent.", "logic": "\nWheeled(alayne)\nPlacating(thomasin)\nPlacating(teodoro)\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Darkish(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) and Excellent(x) -> Remedial(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Digestive(x))\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nExcellent(thomasin) and Botryoidal(thomasin) -> Remedial(thomasin)\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Botryoidal(x))\n\nnot Excellent(thomasin)\n\nnot Excellent(thomasin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Auria is unsanitary. Gaylene is pious. Myrtie is pious. If something is pious then it is anterior. Smart, unlabeled things are basilar. If something is pious then it is aphyllous. All anterior things are unsanitary. If Gaylene is unlabeled and Gaylene is configured then Gaylene is basilar. Cold things are configured. Auria is unlabeled.", "logic": "\nUnsanitary(auria)\nPious(gaylene)\nPious(myrtie)\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Pious(x) and Unlabeled(x) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Aphyllous(x))\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Unsanitary(x))\nUnlabeled(gaylene) and Configured(gaylene) -> Basilar(gaylene)\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Configured(x))\n\nUnlabeled(auria)\n\nUnlabeled(auria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Sheelah is reversible. Debbra is reversible. Debbra is infrequent. If someone is infrequent then they are tillable. If someone is lienal then they are tillable. All tillable people are lienal. If Sheelah is cultivated and Sheelah is tillable then Sheelah is gradable. If someone is gradable then they are not epilithic. All lienal, infrequent people are not epilithic. If someone is lienal and reversible then they are gradable. If someone is epilithic and not lienal then they are gradable. Sheelah is reversible.", "logic": "\nReversible(sheelah)\nReversible(debbra)\nInfrequent(debbra)\nforall x (Infrequent(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Tillable(x) -> Lienal(x))\nCultivated(sheelah) and Tillable(sheelah) -> Gradable(sheelah)\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> not Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Infrequent(x) -> not Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Reversible(x) -> Gradable(x))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) and not Lienal(x) -> Gradable(x))\n\nReversible(sheelah)\n\ntherefore Reversible(sheelah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Nahum is biserrate. Gretta is biserrate. Gretta is freelance. If someone is freelance then they are very. If someone is repentant then they are very. All very people are repentant. If Nahum is tenable and Nahum is very then Nahum is lilac. If someone is lilac then they are not sigmoidal. All repentant, freelance people are not sigmoidal. If someone is repentant and biserrate then they are lilac. If someone is sigmoidal and not repentant then they are lilac. Nahum is not biserrate.", "logic": "\nBiserrate(nahum)\nBiserrate(gretta)\nFreelance(gretta)\nforall x (Freelance(x) -> Very(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Very(x))\nforall x (Very(x) -> Repentant(x))\nTenable(nahum) and Very(nahum) -> Lilac(nahum)\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> not Sigmoidal(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) and Freelance(x) -> not Sigmoidal(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) and Biserrate(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) and not Repentant(x) -> Lilac(x))\n\nnot Biserrate(nahum)\n\ntherefore Biserrate(nahum)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Tabor is armored. Andie is armored. Andie is bacchanal. If someone is bacchanal then they are starring. If someone is allopathic then they are starring. All starring people are allopathic. If Tabor is jerkwater and Tabor is starring then Tabor is unarmored. If someone is unarmored then they are not cybernetic. All allopathic, bacchanal people are not cybernetic. If someone is allopathic and armored then they are unarmored. If someone is cybernetic and not allopathic then they are unarmored. Andie is starring.", "logic": "\nArmored(tabor)\nArmored(andie)\nBacchanal(andie)\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Starring(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Starring(x))\nforall x (Starring(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nJerkwater(tabor) and Starring(tabor) -> Unarmored(tabor)\nforall x (Unarmored(x) -> not Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Bacchanal(x) -> not Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Armored(x) -> Unarmored(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) and not Allopathic(x) -> Unarmored(x))\n\nStarring(andie)\n\nBacchanal(andie) and forall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Starring(x)) -> therefore Starring(andie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Netti is polysemous. Pieter is polysemous. Pieter is uncolored. If someone is uncolored then they are capricious. If someone is multilane then they are capricious. All capricious people are multilane. If Netti is priestlike and Netti is capricious then Netti is haphazard. If someone is haphazard then they are not clever. All multilane, uncolored people are not clever. If someone is multilane and polysemous then they are haphazard. If someone is clever and not multilane then they are haphazard. Pieter is not capricious.", "logic": "\nPolysemous(netti)\nPolysemous(pieter)\nUncolored(pieter)\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Capricious(x))\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Capricious(x))\nforall x (Capricious(x) -> Multilane(x))\nPriestlike(netti) and Capricious(netti) -> Haphazard(netti)\nforall x (Haphazard(x) -> not Clever(x))\nforall x (Multilane(x) and Uncolored(x) -> not Clever(x))\nforall x (Multilane(x) and Polysemous(x) -> Haphazard(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) and not Multilane(x) -> Haphazard(x))\n\nnot Capricious(pieter)\n\nUncolored(pieter) and forall x (Uncolored(x) -> Capricious(x)) -> therefore Capricious(pieter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Hirsch is ironed. Loise is ironed. Loise is phyletic. If someone is phyletic then they are clashing. If someone is pokey then they are clashing. All clashing people are pokey. If Hirsch is dowered and Hirsch is clashing then Hirsch is floodlit. If someone is floodlit then they are not aslant. All pokey, phyletic people are not aslant. If someone is pokey and ironed then they are floodlit. If someone is aslant and not pokey then they are floodlit. Loise is pokey.", "logic": "\nIroned(hirsch)\nIroned(loise)\nPhyletic(loise)\nforall x (Phyletic(x) -> Clashing(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) -> Clashing(x))\nforall x (Clashing(x) -> Pokey(x))\nDowered(hirsch) and Clashing(hirsch) -> Floodlit(hirsch)\nforall x (Floodlit(x) -> not Aslant(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) and Phyletic(x) -> not Aslant(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) and Ironed(x) -> Floodlit(x))\nforall x (Aslant(x) and not Pokey(x) -> Floodlit(x))\n\nPokey(loise)\n\nPhyletic(loise) and forall x (Phyletic(x) -> Clashing(x)) -> therefore Clashing(loise) Clashing(loise) and forall x (Clashing(x) -> Pokey(x)) -> therefore Pokey(loise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Teodoor is unmerited. Arlene is unmerited. Arlene is orgiastic. If someone is orgiastic then they are roguish. If someone is nonaged then they are roguish. All roguish people are nonaged. If Teodoor is unspent and Teodoor is roguish then Teodoor is canonised. If someone is canonised then they are not exhaustive. All nonaged, orgiastic people are not exhaustive. If someone is nonaged and unmerited then they are canonised. If someone is exhaustive and not nonaged then they are canonised. Arlene is not nonaged.", "logic": "\nUnmerited(teodoor)\nUnmerited(arlene)\nOrgiastic(arlene)\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Roguish(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Roguish(x))\nforall x (Roguish(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nUnspent(teodoor) and Roguish(teodoor) -> Canonised(teodoor)\nforall x (Canonised(x) -> not Exhaustive(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) and Orgiastic(x) -> not Exhaustive(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) and Unmerited(x) -> Canonised(x))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) and not Nonaged(x) -> Canonised(x))\n\nnot Nonaged(arlene)\n\nOrgiastic(arlene) and forall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Roguish(x)) -> therefore Roguish(arlene) Roguish(arlene) and forall x (Roguish(x) -> Nonaged(x)) -> therefore Nonaged(arlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Slim is funguslike. Flossie is funguslike. Flossie is arboriform. If someone is arboriform then they are branched. If someone is capitular then they are branched. All branched people are capitular. If Slim is unsalaried and Slim is branched then Slim is leaflike. If someone is leaflike then they are not nominated. All capitular, arboriform people are not nominated. If someone is capitular and funguslike then they are leaflike. If someone is nominated and not capitular then they are leaflike. Flossie is not nominated.", "logic": "\nFunguslike(slim)\nFunguslike(flossie)\nArboriform(flossie)\nforall x (Arboriform(x) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Branched(x) -> Capitular(x))\nUnsalaried(slim) and Branched(slim) -> Leaflike(slim)\nforall x (Leaflike(x) -> not Nominated(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) and Arboriform(x) -> not Nominated(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) and Funguslike(x) -> Leaflike(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and not Capitular(x) -> Leaflike(x))\n\nnot Nominated(flossie)\n\nArboriform(flossie) and forall x (Arboriform(x) -> Branched(x)) -> therefore Branched(flossie) Branched(flossie) and forall x (Branched(x) -> Capitular(x)) -> therefore Capitular(flossie) Capitular(flossie) and Arboriform(flossie) and forall x (Capitular(x) and Arboriform(x) -> not Nominated(x)) -> therefore not Nominated(flossie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Huntlee is parotid. Bealle is parotid. Bealle is mindful. If someone is mindful then they are biconvex. If someone is bizonal then they are biconvex. All biconvex people are bizonal. If Huntlee is precast and Huntlee is biconvex then Huntlee is mated. If someone is mated then they are not powdery. All bizonal, mindful people are not powdery. If someone is bizonal and parotid then they are mated. If someone is powdery and not bizonal then they are mated. Bealle is not mated.", "logic": "\nParotid(huntlee)\nParotid(bealle)\nMindful(bealle)\nforall x (Mindful(x) -> Biconvex(x))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) -> Biconvex(x))\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> Bizonal(x))\nPrecast(huntlee) and Biconvex(huntlee) -> Mated(huntlee)\nforall x (Mated(x) -> not Powdery(x))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) and Mindful(x) -> not Powdery(x))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) and Parotid(x) -> Mated(x))\nforall x (Powdery(x) and not Bizonal(x) -> Mated(x))\n\nnot Mated(bealle)\n\nMindful(bealle) and forall x (Mindful(x) -> Biconvex(x)) -> therefore Biconvex(bealle) Biconvex(bealle) and forall x (Biconvex(x) -> Bizonal(x)) -> therefore Bizonal(bealle) Bizonal(bealle) and Parotid(bealle) and forall x (Bizonal(x) and Parotid(x) -> Mated(x)) -> therefore Mated(bealle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Wayne is catenulate. Gene is catenulate. Gene is uncousinly. If someone is uncousinly then they are fatherly. If someone is winsome then they are fatherly. All fatherly people are winsome. If Wayne is phantom and Wayne is fatherly then Wayne is polyploid. If someone is polyploid then they are not waxy. All winsome, uncousinly people are not waxy. If someone is winsome and catenulate then they are polyploid. If someone is waxy and not winsome then they are polyploid. Wayne is not winsome.", "logic": "\nCatenulate(wayne)\nCatenulate(gene)\nUncousinly(gene)\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Fatherly(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) -> Fatherly(x))\nforall x (Fatherly(x) -> Winsome(x))\nPhantom(wayne) and Fatherly(wayne) -> Polyploid(wayne)\nforall x (Polyploid(x) -> not Waxy(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Uncousinly(x) -> not Waxy(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Catenulate(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Waxy(x) and not Winsome(x) -> Polyploid(x))\n\nnot Winsome(wayne)\n\nforall x (Fatherly(x) -> Winsome(x)) <- forall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Fatherly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Marnia is median. Angy is median. Angy is choleraic. If someone is choleraic then they are finer. If someone is unhallowed then they are finer. All finer people are unhallowed. If Marnia is candescent and Marnia is finer then Marnia is punctured. If someone is punctured then they are not bungling. All unhallowed, choleraic people are not bungling. If someone is unhallowed and median then they are punctured. If someone is bungling and not unhallowed then they are punctured. Marnia is finer.", "logic": "\nMedian(marnia)\nMedian(angy)\nCholeraic(angy)\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Unhallowed(x))\nCandescent(marnia) and Finer(marnia) -> Punctured(marnia)\nforall x (Punctured(x) -> not Bungling(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and Choleraic(x) -> not Bungling(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and Median(x) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Bungling(x) and not Unhallowed(x) -> Punctured(x))\n\nFiner(marnia)\n\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) -> Finer(x)) <- forall x (Finer(x) -> Unhallowed(x)) <- forall x (Choleraic(x) -> Finer(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Kacie is floating. Dynah is floating. Dynah is aware. If someone is aware then they are drowsy. If someone is trancelike then they are drowsy. All drowsy people are trancelike. If Kacie is audible and Kacie is drowsy then Kacie is manageable. If someone is manageable then they are not despiteful. All trancelike, aware people are not despiteful. If someone is trancelike and floating then they are manageable. If someone is despiteful and not trancelike then they are manageable. Kacie is not manageable.", "logic": "\nFloating(kacie)\nFloating(dynah)\nAware(dynah)\nforall x (Aware(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nAudible(kacie) and Drowsy(kacie) -> Manageable(kacie)\nforall x (Manageable(x) -> not Despiteful(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) and Aware(x) -> not Despiteful(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) and Floating(x) -> Manageable(x))\nforall x (Despiteful(x) and not Trancelike(x) -> Manageable(x))\n\nnot Manageable(kacie)\n\nforall x (Trancelike(x) and Floating(x) -> Manageable(x)) <- forall x (Drowsy(x) -> Trancelike(x)) <- forall x (Aware(x) -> Drowsy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Enriqueta is oiled. Abby is oiled. Abby is principled. If someone is principled then they are monophonic. If someone is dualistic then they are monophonic. All monophonic people are dualistic. If Enriqueta is wheezing and Enriqueta is monophonic then Enriqueta is nosohusial. If someone is nosohusial then they are not passive. All dualistic, principled people are not passive. If someone is dualistic and oiled then they are nosohusial. If someone is passive and not dualistic then they are nosohusial. Abby is wheezing.", "logic": "\nOiled(enriqueta)\nOiled(abby)\nPrincipled(abby)\nforall x (Principled(x) -> Monophonic(x))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) -> Monophonic(x))\nforall x (Monophonic(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nWheezing(enriqueta) and Monophonic(enriqueta) -> Nosohusial(enriqueta)\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> not Passive(x))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) and Principled(x) -> not Passive(x))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) and Oiled(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\nforall x (Passive(x) and not Dualistic(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\n\nWheezing(abby)\n\nWheezing(abby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Chen is gloomy. Ric is gloomy. Ric is looted. If someone is looted then they are unemployed. If someone is gradual then they are unemployed. All unemployed people are gradual. If Chen is enamored and Chen is unemployed then Chen is unerasable. If someone is unerasable then they are not distaff. All gradual, looted people are not distaff. If someone is gradual and gloomy then they are unerasable. If someone is distaff and not gradual then they are unerasable. Chen is not distaff.", "logic": "\nGloomy(chen)\nGloomy(ric)\nLooted(ric)\nforall x (Looted(x) -> Unemployed(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) -> Unemployed(x))\nforall x (Unemployed(x) -> Gradual(x))\nEnamored(chen) and Unemployed(chen) -> Unerasable(chen)\nforall x (Unerasable(x) -> not Distaff(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) and Looted(x) -> not Distaff(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) and Gloomy(x) -> Unerasable(x))\nforall x (Distaff(x) and not Gradual(x) -> Unerasable(x))\n\nnot Distaff(chen)\n\nnot Distaff(chen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Micah is addlepated. Chet is addlepated. Chet is thenar. If someone is thenar then they are energizing. If someone is anabatic then they are energizing. All energizing people are anabatic. If Micah is mired and Micah is energizing then Micah is middlemost. If someone is middlemost then they are not ungarbed. All anabatic, thenar people are not ungarbed. If someone is anabatic and addlepated then they are middlemost. If someone is ungarbed and not anabatic then they are middlemost. Micah is thenar.", "logic": "\nAddlepated(micah)\nAddlepated(chet)\nThenar(chet)\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Anabatic(x) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Energizing(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nMired(micah) and Energizing(micah) -> Middlemost(micah)\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> not Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Anabatic(x) and Thenar(x) -> not Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Anabatic(x) and Addlepated(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) and not Anabatic(x) -> Middlemost(x))\n\nThenar(micah)\n\nThenar(micah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "The hudson chamber the helaine. The hudson is anatomical. The hudson is hotheaded. The hudson is not toneless. The hudson is buccal. The hudson ritualize the helaine. The hudson spud the helaine. The helaine chamber the hudson. The helaine is not hotheaded. The helaine is toneless. The helaine ritualize the hudson. The helaine does not visit the hudson. If someone chamber the hudson then the hudson ritualize the helaine. If someone is anatomical then they are hungry. If someone chamber the helaine and they visit the hudson then they do not eat the hudson. If someone is anatomical then they visit the helaine. If someone chamber the helaine then they visit the hudson. If the hudson is hotheaded and the hudson does not see the helaine then the helaine is toneless. If someone ritualize the helaine and they do not eat the hudson then they do not see the hudson. If someone spud the helaine and the helaine does not see the hudson then they are toneless. The helaine is toneless.", "logic": "\nChamber(hudson, helaine)\nAnatomical(hudson)\nHotheaded(hudson)\nnot Toneless(hudson)\nBuccal(hudson)\nRitualize(hudson, helaine)\nSpud(hudson, helaine)\nChamber(helaine, hudson)\nnot Hotheaded(helaine)\nToneless(helaine)\nRitualize(helaine, hudson)\nnot Spud(helaine, hudson)\nforall x (Chamber(x, hudson) -> Ritualize(hudson, helaine))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Hungry(x))\nforall x (Chamber(x, helaine) and Spud(x, hudson) -> not Chamber(x, hudson))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Spud(x, helaine))\nforall x (Chamber(x, helaine) -> Spud(x, hudson))\nHotheaded(hudson) and not Ritualize(hudson, helaine) -> Toneless(helaine)\nforall x (Ritualize(x, helaine) and not Chamber(x, hudson) -> not Ritualize(x, hudson))\nforall x (Spud(x, helaine) and not Ritualize(helaine, hudson) -> Toneless(x))\n\nToneless(helaine)\n\ntherefore Toneless(helaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The hertha paginate the dino. The hertha is enlivened. The hertha is unmarred. The hertha is not supreme. The hertha is postpartum. The hertha blight the dino. The hertha mush the dino. The dino paginate the hertha. The dino is not unmarred. The dino is supreme. The dino blight the hertha. The dino does not visit the hertha. If someone paginate the hertha then the hertha blight the dino. If someone is enlivened then they are correlate. If someone paginate the dino and they visit the hertha then they do not eat the hertha. If someone is enlivened then they visit the dino. If someone paginate the dino then they visit the hertha. If the hertha is unmarred and the hertha does not see the dino then the dino is supreme. If someone blight the dino and they do not eat the hertha then they do not see the hertha. If someone mush the dino and the dino does not see the hertha then they are supreme. The hertha does not visit the dino.", "logic": "\nPaginate(hertha, dino)\nEnlivened(hertha)\nUnmarred(hertha)\nnot Supreme(hertha)\nPostpartum(hertha)\nBlight(hertha, dino)\nMush(hertha, dino)\nPaginate(dino, hertha)\nnot Unmarred(dino)\nSupreme(dino)\nBlight(dino, hertha)\nnot Mush(dino, hertha)\nforall x (Paginate(x, hertha) -> Blight(hertha, dino))\nforall x (Enlivened(x) -> Correlate(x))\nforall x (Paginate(x, dino) and Mush(x, hertha) -> not Paginate(x, hertha))\nforall x (Enlivened(x) -> Mush(x, dino))\nforall x (Paginate(x, dino) -> Mush(x, hertha))\nUnmarred(hertha) and not Blight(hertha, dino) -> Supreme(dino)\nforall x (Blight(x, dino) and not Paginate(x, hertha) -> not Blight(x, hertha))\nforall x (Mush(x, dino) and not Blight(dino, hertha) -> Supreme(x))\n\nnot Mush(hertha, dino)\n\ntherefore Mush(hertha, dino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The quintina foretell the rozalie. The quintina is hematic. The quintina is tricky. The quintina is not tinkly. The quintina is monocarpic. The quintina concenter the rozalie. The quintina groan the rozalie. The rozalie foretell the quintina. The rozalie is not tricky. The rozalie is tinkly. The rozalie concenter the quintina. The rozalie does not visit the quintina. If someone foretell the quintina then the quintina concenter the rozalie. If someone is hematic then they are adiabatic. If someone foretell the rozalie and they visit the quintina then they do not eat the quintina. If someone is hematic then they visit the rozalie. If someone foretell the rozalie then they visit the quintina. If the quintina is tricky and the quintina does not see the rozalie then the rozalie is tinkly. If someone concenter the rozalie and they do not eat the quintina then they do not see the quintina. If someone groan the rozalie and the rozalie does not see the quintina then they are tinkly. The quintina is adiabatic.", "logic": "\nForetell(quintina, rozalie)\nHematic(quintina)\nTricky(quintina)\nnot Tinkly(quintina)\nMonocarpic(quintina)\nConcenter(quintina, rozalie)\nGroan(quintina, rozalie)\nForetell(rozalie, quintina)\nnot Tricky(rozalie)\nTinkly(rozalie)\nConcenter(rozalie, quintina)\nnot Groan(rozalie, quintina)\nforall x (Foretell(x, quintina) -> Concenter(quintina, rozalie))\nforall x (Hematic(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Foretell(x, rozalie) and Groan(x, quintina) -> not Foretell(x, quintina))\nforall x (Hematic(x) -> Groan(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Foretell(x, rozalie) -> Groan(x, quintina))\nTricky(quintina) and not Concenter(quintina, rozalie) -> Tinkly(rozalie)\nforall x (Concenter(x, rozalie) and not Foretell(x, quintina) -> not Concenter(x, quintina))\nforall x (Groan(x, rozalie) and not Concenter(rozalie, quintina) -> Tinkly(x))\n\nAdiabatic(quintina)\n\nHematic(quintina) and forall x (Hematic(x) -> Adiabatic(x)) -> therefore Adiabatic(quintina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The eugenia luff the erminie. The eugenia is scant. The eugenia is accessary. The eugenia is not azimuthal. The eugenia is glutinous. The eugenia syncopate the erminie. The eugenia trickle the erminie. The erminie luff the eugenia. The erminie is not accessary. The erminie is azimuthal. The erminie syncopate the eugenia. The erminie does not visit the eugenia. If someone luff the eugenia then the eugenia syncopate the erminie. If someone is scant then they are aneuploid. If someone luff the erminie and they visit the eugenia then they do not eat the eugenia. If someone is scant then they visit the erminie. If someone luff the erminie then they visit the eugenia. If the eugenia is accessary and the eugenia does not see the erminie then the erminie is azimuthal. If someone syncopate the erminie and they do not eat the eugenia then they do not see the eugenia. If someone trickle the erminie and the erminie does not see the eugenia then they are azimuthal. The eugenia is not aneuploid.", "logic": "\nLuff(eugenia, erminie)\nScant(eugenia)\nAccessary(eugenia)\nnot Azimuthal(eugenia)\nGlutinous(eugenia)\nSyncopate(eugenia, erminie)\nTrickle(eugenia, erminie)\nLuff(erminie, eugenia)\nnot Accessary(erminie)\nAzimuthal(erminie)\nSyncopate(erminie, eugenia)\nnot Trickle(erminie, eugenia)\nforall x (Luff(x, eugenia) -> Syncopate(eugenia, erminie))\nforall x (Scant(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Luff(x, erminie) and Trickle(x, eugenia) -> not Luff(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Scant(x) -> Trickle(x, erminie))\nforall x (Luff(x, erminie) -> Trickle(x, eugenia))\nAccessary(eugenia) and not Syncopate(eugenia, erminie) -> Azimuthal(erminie)\nforall x (Syncopate(x, erminie) and not Luff(x, eugenia) -> not Syncopate(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Trickle(x, erminie) and not Syncopate(erminie, eugenia) -> Azimuthal(x))\n\nnot Aneuploid(eugenia)\n\nScant(eugenia) and forall x (Scant(x) -> Aneuploid(x)) -> therefore Aneuploid(eugenia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The derrek ware the dionne. The derrek is gracious. The derrek is kayoed. The derrek is not tantamount. The derrek is debile. The derrek gild the dionne. The derrek endeavor the dionne. The dionne ware the derrek. The dionne is not kayoed. The dionne is tantamount. The dionne gild the derrek. The dionne does not visit the derrek. If someone ware the derrek then the derrek gild the dionne. If someone is gracious then they are dormie. If someone ware the dionne and they visit the derrek then they do not eat the derrek. If someone is gracious then they visit the dionne. If someone ware the dionne then they visit the derrek. If the derrek is kayoed and the derrek does not see the dionne then the dionne is tantamount. If someone gild the dionne and they do not eat the derrek then they do not see the derrek. If someone endeavor the dionne and the dionne does not see the derrek then they are tantamount. The derrek does not eat the derrek.", "logic": "\nWare(derrek, dionne)\nGracious(derrek)\nKayoed(derrek)\nnot Tantamount(derrek)\nDebile(derrek)\nGild(derrek, dionne)\nEndeavor(derrek, dionne)\nWare(dionne, derrek)\nnot Kayoed(dionne)\nTantamount(dionne)\nGild(dionne, derrek)\nnot Endeavor(dionne, derrek)\nforall x (Ware(x, derrek) -> Gild(derrek, dionne))\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Ware(x, dionne) and Endeavor(x, derrek) -> not Ware(x, derrek))\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Endeavor(x, dionne))\nforall x (Ware(x, dionne) -> Endeavor(x, derrek))\nKayoed(derrek) and not Gild(derrek, dionne) -> Tantamount(dionne)\nforall x (Gild(x, dionne) and not Ware(x, derrek) -> not Gild(x, derrek))\nforall x (Endeavor(x, dionne) and not Gild(dionne, derrek) -> Tantamount(x))\n\nnot Ware(derrek, derrek)\n\nWare(derrek, dionne) and forall x (Ware(x, dionne) -> Endeavor(x, derrek)) -> therefore Endeavor(derrek, derrek) Ware(derrek, dionne) and Endeavor(derrek, derrek) and forall x (Ware(x, dionne) and Endeavor(x, derrek) -> not Ware(x, derrek)) -> therefore not Ware(derrek, derrek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The renata stumble the korney. The renata is epical. The renata is unwebbed. The renata is not pitiable. The renata is terrene. The renata keynote the korney. The renata harken the korney. The korney stumble the renata. The korney is not unwebbed. The korney is pitiable. The korney keynote the renata. The korney does not visit the renata. If someone stumble the renata then the renata keynote the korney. If someone is epical then they are jilted. If someone stumble the korney and they visit the renata then they do not eat the renata. If someone is epical then they visit the korney. If someone stumble the korney then they visit the renata. If the renata is unwebbed and the renata does not see the korney then the korney is pitiable. If someone keynote the korney and they do not eat the renata then they do not see the renata. If someone harken the korney and the korney does not see the renata then they are pitiable. The renata stumble the renata.", "logic": "\nStumble(renata, korney)\nEpical(renata)\nUnwebbed(renata)\nnot Pitiable(renata)\nTerrene(renata)\nKeynote(renata, korney)\nHarken(renata, korney)\nStumble(korney, renata)\nnot Unwebbed(korney)\nPitiable(korney)\nKeynote(korney, renata)\nnot Harken(korney, renata)\nforall x (Stumble(x, renata) -> Keynote(renata, korney))\nforall x (Epical(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Stumble(x, korney) and Harken(x, renata) -> not Stumble(x, renata))\nforall x (Epical(x) -> Harken(x, korney))\nforall x (Stumble(x, korney) -> Harken(x, renata))\nUnwebbed(renata) and not Keynote(renata, korney) -> Pitiable(korney)\nforall x (Keynote(x, korney) and not Stumble(x, renata) -> not Keynote(x, renata))\nforall x (Harken(x, korney) and not Keynote(korney, renata) -> Pitiable(x))\n\nStumble(renata, renata)\n\nStumble(renata, korney) and forall x (Stumble(x, korney) -> Harken(x, renata)) -> therefore Harken(renata, renata) Stumble(renata, korney) and Harken(renata, renata) and forall x (Stumble(x, korney) and Harken(x, renata) -> not Stumble(x, renata)) -> therefore not Stumble(renata, renata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The whittaker ferret the shea. The whittaker is remiss. The whittaker is hormonal. The whittaker is not aciculate. The whittaker is fretful. The whittaker foray the shea. The whittaker reclassify the shea. The shea ferret the whittaker. The shea is not hormonal. The shea is aciculate. The shea foray the whittaker. The shea does not visit the whittaker. If someone ferret the whittaker then the whittaker foray the shea. If someone is remiss then they are screechy. If someone ferret the shea and they visit the whittaker then they do not eat the whittaker. If someone is remiss then they visit the shea. If someone ferret the shea then they visit the whittaker. If the whittaker is hormonal and the whittaker does not see the shea then the shea is aciculate. If someone foray the shea and they do not eat the whittaker then they do not see the whittaker. If someone reclassify the shea and the shea does not see the whittaker then they are aciculate. The whittaker does not see the whittaker.", "logic": "\nFerret(whittaker, shea)\nRemiss(whittaker)\nHormonal(whittaker)\nnot Aciculate(whittaker)\nFretful(whittaker)\nForay(whittaker, shea)\nReclassify(whittaker, shea)\nFerret(shea, whittaker)\nnot Hormonal(shea)\nAciculate(shea)\nForay(shea, whittaker)\nnot Reclassify(shea, whittaker)\nforall x (Ferret(x, whittaker) -> Foray(whittaker, shea))\nforall x (Remiss(x) -> Screechy(x))\nforall x (Ferret(x, shea) and Reclassify(x, whittaker) -> not Ferret(x, whittaker))\nforall x (Remiss(x) -> Reclassify(x, shea))\nforall x (Ferret(x, shea) -> Reclassify(x, whittaker))\nHormonal(whittaker) and not Foray(whittaker, shea) -> Aciculate(shea)\nforall x (Foray(x, shea) and not Ferret(x, whittaker) -> not Foray(x, whittaker))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, shea) and not Foray(shea, whittaker) -> Aciculate(x))\n\nnot Foray(whittaker, whittaker)\n\nFerret(whittaker, shea) and forall x (Ferret(x, shea) -> Reclassify(x, whittaker)) -> therefore Reclassify(whittaker, whittaker) Ferret(whittaker, shea) and Reclassify(whittaker, whittaker) and forall x (Ferret(x, shea) and Reclassify(x, whittaker) -> not Ferret(x, whittaker)) -> therefore not Ferret(whittaker, whittaker) Foray(whittaker, shea) and not Ferret(whittaker, whittaker) and forall x (Foray(x, shea) and not Ferret(x, whittaker) -> not Foray(x, whittaker)) -> therefore not Foray(whittaker, whittaker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The geraldina lambast the bart. The geraldina is xciii. The geraldina is angered. The geraldina is not ritual. The geraldina is salt. The geraldina freeze the bart. The geraldina diversify the bart. The bart lambast the geraldina. The bart is not angered. The bart is ritual. The bart freeze the geraldina. The bart does not visit the geraldina. If someone lambast the geraldina then the geraldina freeze the bart. If someone is xciii then they are braided. If someone lambast the bart and they visit the geraldina then they do not eat the geraldina. If someone is xciii then they visit the bart. If someone lambast the bart then they visit the geraldina. If the geraldina is angered and the geraldina does not see the bart then the bart is ritual. If someone freeze the bart and they do not eat the geraldina then they do not see the geraldina. If someone diversify the bart and the bart does not see the geraldina then they are ritual. The geraldina freeze the geraldina.", "logic": "\nLambast(geraldina, bart)\nXciii(geraldina)\nAngered(geraldina)\nnot Ritual(geraldina)\nSalt(geraldina)\nFreeze(geraldina, bart)\nDiversify(geraldina, bart)\nLambast(bart, geraldina)\nnot Angered(bart)\nRitual(bart)\nFreeze(bart, geraldina)\nnot Diversify(bart, geraldina)\nforall x (Lambast(x, geraldina) -> Freeze(geraldina, bart))\nforall x (Xciii(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Lambast(x, bart) and Diversify(x, geraldina) -> not Lambast(x, geraldina))\nforall x (Xciii(x) -> Diversify(x, bart))\nforall x (Lambast(x, bart) -> Diversify(x, geraldina))\nAngered(geraldina) and not Freeze(geraldina, bart) -> Ritual(bart)\nforall x (Freeze(x, bart) and not Lambast(x, geraldina) -> not Freeze(x, geraldina))\nforall x (Diversify(x, bart) and not Freeze(bart, geraldina) -> Ritual(x))\n\nFreeze(geraldina, geraldina)\n\nLambast(geraldina, bart) and forall x (Lambast(x, bart) -> Diversify(x, geraldina)) -> therefore Diversify(geraldina, geraldina) Lambast(geraldina, bart) and Diversify(geraldina, geraldina) and forall x (Lambast(x, bart) and Diversify(x, geraldina) -> not Lambast(x, geraldina)) -> therefore not Lambast(geraldina, geraldina) Freeze(geraldina, bart) and not Lambast(geraldina, geraldina) and forall x (Freeze(x, bart) and not Lambast(x, geraldina) -> not Freeze(x, geraldina)) -> therefore not Freeze(geraldina, geraldina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The bridget shelve the crawford. The bridget is textual. The bridget is limp. The bridget is not pappose. The bridget is outlaw. The bridget bolster the crawford. The bridget denazify the crawford. The crawford shelve the bridget. The crawford is not limp. The crawford is pappose. The crawford bolster the bridget. The crawford does not visit the bridget. If someone shelve the bridget then the bridget bolster the crawford. If someone is textual then they are offsides. If someone shelve the crawford and they visit the bridget then they do not eat the bridget. If someone is textual then they visit the crawford. If someone shelve the crawford then they visit the bridget. If the bridget is limp and the bridget does not see the crawford then the crawford is pappose. If someone bolster the crawford and they do not eat the bridget then they do not see the bridget. If someone denazify the crawford and the crawford does not see the bridget then they are pappose. The crawford does not visit the crawford.", "logic": "\nShelve(bridget, crawford)\nTextual(bridget)\nLimp(bridget)\nnot Pappose(bridget)\nOutlaw(bridget)\nBolster(bridget, crawford)\nDenazify(bridget, crawford)\nShelve(crawford, bridget)\nnot Limp(crawford)\nPappose(crawford)\nBolster(crawford, bridget)\nnot Denazify(crawford, bridget)\nforall x (Shelve(x, bridget) -> Bolster(bridget, crawford))\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Shelve(x, crawford) and Denazify(x, bridget) -> not Shelve(x, bridget))\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Denazify(x, crawford))\nforall x (Shelve(x, crawford) -> Denazify(x, bridget))\nLimp(bridget) and not Bolster(bridget, crawford) -> Pappose(crawford)\nforall x (Bolster(x, crawford) and not Shelve(x, bridget) -> not Bolster(x, bridget))\nforall x (Denazify(x, crawford) and not Bolster(crawford, bridget) -> Pappose(x))\n\nnot Denazify(crawford, crawford)\n\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Denazify(x, crawford)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The felicle gradate the gert. The felicle is altaic. The felicle is airy. The felicle is not endermic. The felicle is antic. The felicle dramatise the gert. The felicle deice the gert. The gert gradate the felicle. The gert is not airy. The gert is endermic. The gert dramatise the felicle. The gert does not visit the felicle. If someone gradate the felicle then the felicle dramatise the gert. If someone is altaic then they are trophic. If someone gradate the gert and they visit the felicle then they do not eat the felicle. If someone is altaic then they visit the gert. If someone gradate the gert then they visit the felicle. If the felicle is airy and the felicle does not see the gert then the gert is endermic. If someone dramatise the gert and they do not eat the felicle then they do not see the felicle. If someone deice the gert and the gert does not see the felicle then they are endermic. The gert is trophic.", "logic": "\nGradate(felicle, gert)\nAltaic(felicle)\nAiry(felicle)\nnot Endermic(felicle)\nAntic(felicle)\nDramatise(felicle, gert)\nDeice(felicle, gert)\nGradate(gert, felicle)\nnot Airy(gert)\nEndermic(gert)\nDramatise(gert, felicle)\nnot Deice(gert, felicle)\nforall x (Gradate(x, felicle) -> Dramatise(felicle, gert))\nforall x (Altaic(x) -> Trophic(x))\nforall x (Gradate(x, gert) and Deice(x, felicle) -> not Gradate(x, felicle))\nforall x (Altaic(x) -> Deice(x, gert))\nforall x (Gradate(x, gert) -> Deice(x, felicle))\nAiry(felicle) and not Dramatise(felicle, gert) -> Endermic(gert)\nforall x (Dramatise(x, gert) and not Gradate(x, felicle) -> not Dramatise(x, felicle))\nforall x (Deice(x, gert) and not Dramatise(gert, felicle) -> Endermic(x))\n\nTrophic(gert)\n\nforall x (Altaic(x) -> Trophic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The dustin slight the gerald. The dustin is monaural. The dustin is hortatory. The dustin is not poor. The dustin is wigged. The dustin suspect the gerald. The dustin flicker the gerald. The gerald slight the dustin. The gerald is not hortatory. The gerald is poor. The gerald suspect the dustin. The gerald does not visit the dustin. If someone slight the dustin then the dustin suspect the gerald. If someone is monaural then they are agelong. If someone slight the gerald and they visit the dustin then they do not eat the dustin. If someone is monaural then they visit the gerald. If someone slight the gerald then they visit the dustin. If the dustin is hortatory and the dustin does not see the gerald then the gerald is poor. If someone suspect the gerald and they do not eat the dustin then they do not see the dustin. If someone flicker the gerald and the gerald does not see the dustin then they are poor. The gerald is not wigged.", "logic": "\nSlight(dustin, gerald)\nMonaural(dustin)\nHortatory(dustin)\nnot Poor(dustin)\nWigged(dustin)\nSuspect(dustin, gerald)\nFlicker(dustin, gerald)\nSlight(gerald, dustin)\nnot Hortatory(gerald)\nPoor(gerald)\nSuspect(gerald, dustin)\nnot Flicker(gerald, dustin)\nforall x (Slight(x, dustin) -> Suspect(dustin, gerald))\nforall x (Monaural(x) -> Agelong(x))\nforall x (Slight(x, gerald) and Flicker(x, dustin) -> not Slight(x, dustin))\nforall x (Monaural(x) -> Flicker(x, gerald))\nforall x (Slight(x, gerald) -> Flicker(x, dustin))\nHortatory(dustin) and not Suspect(dustin, gerald) -> Poor(gerald)\nforall x (Suspect(x, gerald) and not Slight(x, dustin) -> not Suspect(x, dustin))\nforall x (Flicker(x, gerald) and not Suspect(gerald, dustin) -> Poor(x))\n\nnot Wigged(gerald)\n\nnot Wigged(gerald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The alic ransom the milt. The alic is unshapen. The alic is liliaceous. The alic is not changeless. The alic is tobagonian. The alic recant the milt. The alic hinder the milt. The milt ransom the alic. The milt is not liliaceous. The milt is changeless. The milt recant the alic. The milt does not visit the alic. If someone ransom the alic then the alic recant the milt. If someone is unshapen then they are steep. If someone ransom the milt and they visit the alic then they do not eat the alic. If someone is unshapen then they visit the milt. If someone ransom the milt then they visit the alic. If the alic is liliaceous and the alic does not see the milt then the milt is changeless. If someone recant the milt and they do not eat the alic then they do not see the alic. If someone hinder the milt and the milt does not see the alic then they are changeless. The milt recant the milt.", "logic": "\nRansom(alic, milt)\nUnshapen(alic)\nLiliaceous(alic)\nnot Changeless(alic)\nTobagonian(alic)\nRecant(alic, milt)\nHinder(alic, milt)\nRansom(milt, alic)\nnot Liliaceous(milt)\nChangeless(milt)\nRecant(milt, alic)\nnot Hinder(milt, alic)\nforall x (Ransom(x, alic) -> Recant(alic, milt))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Steep(x))\nforall x (Ransom(x, milt) and Hinder(x, alic) -> not Ransom(x, alic))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Hinder(x, milt))\nforall x (Ransom(x, milt) -> Hinder(x, alic))\nLiliaceous(alic) and not Recant(alic, milt) -> Changeless(milt)\nforall x (Recant(x, milt) and not Ransom(x, alic) -> not Recant(x, alic))\nforall x (Hinder(x, milt) and not Recant(milt, alic) -> Changeless(x))\n\nRecant(milt, milt)\n\nRecant(milt, milt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The willey temper the caron. The willey is clotted. The willey is sweetened. The willey is not nuclear. The willey is obovate. The willey fuck the caron. The willey rethink the caron. The caron temper the willey. The caron is not sweetened. The caron is nuclear. The caron fuck the willey. The caron does not visit the willey. If someone temper the willey then the willey fuck the caron. If someone is clotted then they are tubby. If someone temper the caron and they visit the willey then they do not eat the willey. If someone is clotted then they visit the caron. If someone temper the caron then they visit the willey. If the willey is sweetened and the willey does not see the caron then the caron is nuclear. If someone fuck the caron and they do not eat the willey then they do not see the willey. If someone rethink the caron and the caron does not see the willey then they are nuclear. The caron does not eat the caron.", "logic": "\nTemper(willey, caron)\nClotted(willey)\nSweetened(willey)\nnot Nuclear(willey)\nObovate(willey)\nFuck(willey, caron)\nRethink(willey, caron)\nTemper(caron, willey)\nnot Sweetened(caron)\nNuclear(caron)\nFuck(caron, willey)\nnot Rethink(caron, willey)\nforall x (Temper(x, willey) -> Fuck(willey, caron))\nforall x (Clotted(x) -> Tubby(x))\nforall x (Temper(x, caron) and Rethink(x, willey) -> not Temper(x, willey))\nforall x (Clotted(x) -> Rethink(x, caron))\nforall x (Temper(x, caron) -> Rethink(x, willey))\nSweetened(willey) and not Fuck(willey, caron) -> Nuclear(caron)\nforall x (Fuck(x, caron) and not Temper(x, willey) -> not Fuck(x, willey))\nforall x (Rethink(x, caron) and not Fuck(caron, willey) -> Nuclear(x))\n\nnot Temper(caron, caron)\n\nnot Temper(caron, caron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The carmon fasten the nunzio. The carmon is unreduced. The carmon is socialized. The carmon is not erogenous. The carmon is mnemonic. The carmon experiment the nunzio. The carmon addict the nunzio. The nunzio fasten the carmon. The nunzio is not socialized. The nunzio is erogenous. The nunzio experiment the carmon. The nunzio does not visit the carmon. If someone fasten the carmon then the carmon experiment the nunzio. If someone is unreduced then they are plutonic. If someone fasten the nunzio and they visit the carmon then they do not eat the carmon. If someone is unreduced then they visit the nunzio. If someone fasten the nunzio then they visit the carmon. If the carmon is socialized and the carmon does not see the nunzio then the nunzio is erogenous. If someone experiment the nunzio and they do not eat the carmon then they do not see the carmon. If someone addict the nunzio and the nunzio does not see the carmon then they are erogenous. The nunzio is unreduced.", "logic": "\nFasten(carmon, nunzio)\nUnreduced(carmon)\nSocialized(carmon)\nnot Erogenous(carmon)\nMnemonic(carmon)\nExperiment(carmon, nunzio)\nAddict(carmon, nunzio)\nFasten(nunzio, carmon)\nnot Socialized(nunzio)\nErogenous(nunzio)\nExperiment(nunzio, carmon)\nnot Addict(nunzio, carmon)\nforall x (Fasten(x, carmon) -> Experiment(carmon, nunzio))\nforall x (Unreduced(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Fasten(x, nunzio) and Addict(x, carmon) -> not Fasten(x, carmon))\nforall x (Unreduced(x) -> Addict(x, nunzio))\nforall x (Fasten(x, nunzio) -> Addict(x, carmon))\nSocialized(carmon) and not Experiment(carmon, nunzio) -> Erogenous(nunzio)\nforall x (Experiment(x, nunzio) and not Fasten(x, carmon) -> not Experiment(x, carmon))\nforall x (Addict(x, nunzio) and not Experiment(nunzio, carmon) -> Erogenous(x))\n\nUnreduced(nunzio)\n\nUnreduced(nunzio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "Stoddard is painterly. Tilly is passe. Hercules is same. If something is amygdaloid then it is not passe. All painterly things are chimeral. If something is painterly then it is chimeral. Smart, same things are amygdaloid. If something is passe then it is painterly. All passe, impulsive things are painterly. All chimeral things are comburent. Smart, amygdaloid things are same. Tilly is passe.", "logic": "\nPainterly(stoddard)\nPasse(tilly)\nSame(hercules)\nforall x (Amygdaloid(x) -> not Passe(x))\nforall x (Painterly(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nforall x (Painterly(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nforall x (Painterly(x) and Same(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) and Impulsive(x) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Chimeral(x) -> Comburent(x))\nforall x (Painterly(x) and Amygdaloid(x) -> Same(x))\n\nPasse(tilly)\n\ntherefore Passe(tilly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Lawton is thirteenth. Andreas is azotic. Abigail is obscure. If something is vanished then it is not azotic. All thirteenth things are heartening. If something is thirteenth then it is heartening. Smart, obscure things are vanished. If something is azotic then it is thirteenth. All azotic, hexagonal things are thirteenth. All heartening things are multiform. Smart, vanished things are obscure. Andreas is not azotic.", "logic": "\nThirteenth(lawton)\nAzotic(andreas)\nObscure(abigail)\nforall x (Vanished(x) -> not Azotic(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) -> Heartening(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) -> Heartening(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and Obscure(x) -> Vanished(x))\nforall x (Azotic(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Azotic(x) and Hexagonal(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> Multiform(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and Vanished(x) -> Obscure(x))\n\nnot Azotic(andreas)\n\ntherefore Azotic(andreas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Eduardo is analgetic. Hans is ownerless. Sissie is bipedal. If something is slav then it is not ownerless. All analgetic things are metacarpal. If something is analgetic then it is metacarpal. Smart, bipedal things are slav. If something is ownerless then it is analgetic. All ownerless, arillate things are analgetic. All metacarpal things are habited. Smart, slav things are bipedal. Hans is analgetic.", "logic": "\nAnalgetic(eduardo)\nOwnerless(hans)\nBipedal(sissie)\nforall x (Slav(x) -> not Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) and Bipedal(x) -> Slav(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) and Arillate(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) -> Habited(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) and Slav(x) -> Bipedal(x))\n\nAnalgetic(hans)\n\nOwnerless(hans) and forall x (Ownerless(x) -> Analgetic(x)) -> therefore Analgetic(hans)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Tiebout is pandemic. Esmaria is correct. Lorraine is offending. If something is twilight then it is not correct. All pandemic things are wordy. If something is pandemic then it is wordy. Smart, offending things are twilight. If something is correct then it is pandemic. All correct, salty things are pandemic. All wordy things are catty. Smart, twilight things are offending. Tiebout is not wordy.", "logic": "\nPandemic(tiebout)\nCorrect(esmaria)\nOffending(lorraine)\nforall x (Twilight(x) -> not Correct(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) and Offending(x) -> Twilight(x))\nforall x (Correct(x) -> Pandemic(x))\nforall x (Correct(x) and Salty(x) -> Pandemic(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) -> Catty(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) and Twilight(x) -> Offending(x))\n\nnot Wordy(tiebout)\n\nPandemic(tiebout) and forall x (Pandemic(x) -> Wordy(x)) -> therefore Wordy(tiebout)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Archibold is sorry. Orsa is sinewy. Minna is granular. If something is serious then it is not sinewy. All sorry things are tailored. If something is sorry then it is tailored. Smart, granular things are serious. If something is sinewy then it is sorry. All sinewy, uncurving things are sorry. All tailored things are diagonal. Smart, serious things are granular. Orsa is tailored.", "logic": "\nSorry(archibold)\nSinewy(orsa)\nGranular(minna)\nforall x (Serious(x) -> not Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) and Granular(x) -> Serious(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Sorry(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Uncurving(x) -> Sorry(x))\nforall x (Tailored(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) and Serious(x) -> Granular(x))\n\nTailored(orsa)\n\nSinewy(orsa) and forall x (Sinewy(x) -> Sorry(x)) -> therefore Sorry(orsa) Sorry(orsa) and forall x (Sorry(x) -> Tailored(x)) -> therefore Tailored(orsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Angel is weedy. Germana is nutlike. Leiah is clownish. If something is mingy then it is not nutlike. All weedy things are specific. If something is weedy then it is specific. Smart, clownish things are mingy. If something is nutlike then it is weedy. All nutlike, coarctate things are weedy. All specific things are sunrise. Smart, mingy things are clownish. Angel is not sunrise.", "logic": "\nWeedy(angel)\nNutlike(germana)\nClownish(leiah)\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> not Nutlike(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) -> Specific(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) -> Specific(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Clownish(x) -> Mingy(x))\nforall x (Nutlike(x) -> Weedy(x))\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Coarctate(x) -> Weedy(x))\nforall x (Specific(x) -> Sunrise(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Mingy(x) -> Clownish(x))\n\nnot Sunrise(angel)\n\nWeedy(angel) and forall x (Weedy(x) -> Specific(x)) -> therefore Specific(angel) Specific(angel) and forall x (Specific(x) -> Sunrise(x)) -> therefore Sunrise(angel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Aime is slovenian. Dunc is raisable. Nerissa is unshapen. If something is miotic then it is not raisable. All slovenian things are pyrolytic. If something is slovenian then it is pyrolytic. Smart, unshapen things are miotic. If something is raisable then it is slovenian. All raisable, worshipful things are slovenian. All pyrolytic things are unwavering. Smart, miotic things are unshapen. Dunc is unwavering.", "logic": "\nSlovenian(aime)\nRaisable(dunc)\nUnshapen(nerissa)\nforall x (Miotic(x) -> not Raisable(x))\nforall x (Slovenian(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\nforall x (Slovenian(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\nforall x (Slovenian(x) and Unshapen(x) -> Miotic(x))\nforall x (Raisable(x) -> Slovenian(x))\nforall x (Raisable(x) and Worshipful(x) -> Slovenian(x))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Unwavering(x))\nforall x (Slovenian(x) and Miotic(x) -> Unshapen(x))\n\nUnwavering(dunc)\n\nRaisable(dunc) and forall x (Raisable(x) -> Slovenian(x)) -> therefore Slovenian(dunc) Slovenian(dunc) and forall x (Slovenian(x) -> Pyrolytic(x)) -> therefore Pyrolytic(dunc) Pyrolytic(dunc) and forall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Unwavering(x)) -> therefore Unwavering(dunc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Lorna is hebdomadal. Carmelita is sunny. Barby is spiritous. If something is shodden then it is not sunny. All hebdomadal things are ballistic. If something is hebdomadal then it is ballistic. Smart, spiritous things are shodden. If something is sunny then it is hebdomadal. All sunny, fisheye things are hebdomadal. All ballistic things are septic. Smart, shodden things are spiritous. Carmelita is not septic.", "logic": "\nHebdomadal(lorna)\nSunny(carmelita)\nSpiritous(barby)\nforall x (Shodden(x) -> not Sunny(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Spiritous(x) -> Shodden(x))\nforall x (Sunny(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Sunny(x) and Fisheye(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Septic(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Shodden(x) -> Spiritous(x))\n\nnot Septic(carmelita)\n\nSunny(carmelita) and forall x (Sunny(x) -> Hebdomadal(x)) -> therefore Hebdomadal(carmelita) Hebdomadal(carmelita) and forall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Ballistic(x)) -> therefore Ballistic(carmelita) Ballistic(carmelita) and forall x (Ballistic(x) -> Septic(x)) -> therefore Septic(carmelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Karsten is capitalist. Frances is similar. Nessi is ascitic. If something is bantoid then it is not similar. All capitalist things are braw. If something is capitalist then it is braw. Smart, ascitic things are bantoid. If something is similar then it is capitalist. All similar, splayfoot things are capitalist. All braw things are upfield. Smart, bantoid things are ascitic. Nessi is not braw.", "logic": "\nCapitalist(karsten)\nSimilar(frances)\nAscitic(nessi)\nforall x (Bantoid(x) -> not Similar(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) and Ascitic(x) -> Bantoid(x))\nforall x (Similar(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Similar(x) and Splayfoot(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) -> Upfield(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) and Bantoid(x) -> Ascitic(x))\n\nnot Braw(nessi)\n\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Braw(x)) <- forall x (Similar(x) -> Capitalist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Bertram is bridgeable. Alia is cartesian. Florina is unimodal. If something is singable then it is not cartesian. All bridgeable things are unpotted. If something is bridgeable then it is unpotted. Smart, unimodal things are singable. If something is cartesian then it is bridgeable. All cartesian, straight things are bridgeable. All unpotted things are indigo. Smart, singable things are unimodal. Alia is singable.", "logic": "\nBridgeable(bertram)\nCartesian(alia)\nUnimodal(florina)\nforall x (Singable(x) -> not Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and Unimodal(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) and Straight(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) -> Indigo(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and Singable(x) -> Unimodal(x))\n\nSingable(alia)\n\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and Unimodal(x) -> Singable(x)) <- forall x (Bridgeable(x) and Singable(x) -> Unimodal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Camile is adoptable. Sibeal is mawkish. Ruben is bronzy. If something is arrayed then it is not mawkish. All adoptable things are tested. If something is adoptable then it is tested. Smart, bronzy things are arrayed. If something is mawkish then it is adoptable. All mawkish, ashen things are adoptable. All tested things are riddled. Smart, arrayed things are bronzy. Camile is not arrayed.", "logic": "\nAdoptable(camile)\nMawkish(sibeal)\nBronzy(ruben)\nforall x (Arrayed(x) -> not Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Tested(x))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) -> Tested(x))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) and Ashen(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Tested(x) -> Riddled(x))\nforall x (Adoptable(x) and Arrayed(x) -> Bronzy(x))\n\nnot Arrayed(camile)\n\nforall x (Adoptable(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Arrayed(x)) <- forall x (Adoptable(x) and Arrayed(x) -> Bronzy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Ranee is contraband. Matias is unequal. Ilana is upbound. If something is pandurate then it is not unequal. All contraband things are malapropos. If something is contraband then it is malapropos. Smart, upbound things are pandurate. If something is unequal then it is contraband. All unequal, bypast things are contraband. All malapropos things are neoclassic. Smart, pandurate things are upbound. Ilana is contraband.", "logic": "\nContraband(ranee)\nUnequal(matias)\nUpbound(ilana)\nforall x (Pandurate(x) -> not Unequal(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) and Upbound(x) -> Pandurate(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Bypast(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Malapropos(x) -> Neoclassic(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) and Pandurate(x) -> Upbound(x))\n\nContraband(ilana)\n\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Contraband(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Camella is fisheye. Tobie is twiggy. Bertram is antacid. If something is victimised then it is not twiggy. All fisheye things are isolated. If something is fisheye then it is isolated. Smart, antacid things are victimised. If something is twiggy then it is fisheye. All twiggy, beheaded things are fisheye. All isolated things are intoxicant. Smart, victimised things are antacid. Camella is not beheaded.", "logic": "\nFisheye(camella)\nTwiggy(tobie)\nAntacid(bertram)\nforall x (Victimised(x) -> not Twiggy(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) and Antacid(x) -> Victimised(x))\nforall x (Twiggy(x) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Twiggy(x) and Beheaded(x) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Isolated(x) -> Intoxicant(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) and Victimised(x) -> Antacid(x))\n\nnot Beheaded(camella)\n\nnot Beheaded(camella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Clari is brickle. Jessee is moderne. Joline is sclerotic. If something is tectonic then it is not moderne. All brickle things are graceful. If something is brickle then it is graceful. Smart, sclerotic things are tectonic. If something is moderne then it is brickle. All moderne, capitular things are brickle. All graceful things are choosey. Smart, tectonic things are sclerotic. Jessee is capitular.", "logic": "\nBrickle(clari)\nModerne(jessee)\nSclerotic(joline)\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> not Moderne(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) -> Graceful(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) -> Graceful(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) and Sclerotic(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Brickle(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) and Capitular(x) -> Brickle(x))\nforall x (Graceful(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Brickle(x) and Tectonic(x) -> Sclerotic(x))\n\nCapitular(jessee)\n\nCapitular(jessee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Roseann is anemic. Lib is unkind. Tine is angry. If something is veiled then it is not unkind. All anemic things are branched. If something is anemic then it is branched. Smart, angry things are veiled. If something is unkind then it is anemic. All unkind, uncovered things are anemic. All branched things are spiffy. Smart, veiled things are angry. Tine is not unkind.", "logic": "\nAnemic(roseann)\nUnkind(lib)\nAngry(tine)\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> not Unkind(x))\nforall x (Anemic(x) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Anemic(x) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Anemic(x) and Angry(x) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Anemic(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) and Uncovered(x) -> Anemic(x))\nforall x (Branched(x) -> Spiffy(x))\nforall x (Anemic(x) and Veiled(x) -> Angry(x))\n\nnot Unkind(tine)\n\nnot Unkind(tine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Umberto is sneaking. Gustav is ignited. Butler is chewable. If something is indecorous then it is not ignited. All sneaking things are grueling. If something is sneaking then it is grueling. Smart, chewable things are indecorous. If something is ignited then it is sneaking. All ignited, artistic things are sneaking. All grueling things are feculent. Smart, indecorous things are chewable. Umberto is ignited.", "logic": "\nSneaking(umberto)\nIgnited(gustav)\nChewable(butler)\nforall x (Indecorous(x) -> not Ignited(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) and Chewable(x) -> Indecorous(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) -> Sneaking(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) and Artistic(x) -> Sneaking(x))\nforall x (Grueling(x) -> Feculent(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) and Indecorous(x) -> Chewable(x))\n\nIgnited(umberto)\n\nIgnited(umberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "The elton is quadruped. The elton cavern the leola. The elton trap the leola. The elton jettison the leola. The elton jettison the beatrisa. The leola is quadruped. The leola is morbific. The leola cavern the beatrisa. The leola trap the beatrisa. The beatrisa does not see the leola. If someone trap the beatrisa then they are morbific. If someone jettison the elton and the elton trap the beatrisa then the beatrisa cavern the leola. If someone cavern the leola and they need the elton then the elton is exulting. If someone is morbific and they see the elton then the elton trap the beatrisa. If someone trap the leola then the leola cavern the elton. If someone is exulting then they see the beatrisa. If someone is quadruped then they need the elton. If someone cavern the leola and the leola cavern the beatrisa then the leola jettison the elton. The beatrisa does not see the leola.", "logic": "\nQuadruped(elton)\nCavern(elton, leola)\nTrap(elton, leola)\nJettison(elton, leola)\nJettison(elton, beatrisa)\nQuadruped(leola)\nMorbific(leola)\nCavern(leola, beatrisa)\nTrap(leola, beatrisa)\nnot Trap(beatrisa, leola)\nforall x (Trap(x, beatrisa) -> Morbific(x))\nforall x (Jettison(x, elton) and Trap(elton, beatrisa) -> Cavern(beatrisa, leola))\nforall x (Cavern(x, leola) and Cavern(x, elton) -> Exulting(elton))\nforall x (Morbific(x) and Trap(x, elton) -> Trap(elton, beatrisa))\nforall x (Trap(x, leola) -> Cavern(leola, elton))\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Trap(x, beatrisa))\nforall x (Quadruped(x) -> Cavern(x, elton))\nforall x (Cavern(x, leola) and Cavern(leola, beatrisa) -> Jettison(leola, elton))\n\nnot Trap(beatrisa, leola)\n\ntherefore not Trap(beatrisa, leola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The maisie is palladian. The maisie bevel the gail. The maisie deck the gail. The maisie outfit the gail. The maisie outfit the pinchas. The gail is palladian. The gail is brusque. The gail bevel the pinchas. The gail deck the pinchas. The pinchas does not see the gail. If someone deck the pinchas then they are brusque. If someone outfit the maisie and the maisie deck the pinchas then the pinchas bevel the gail. If someone bevel the gail and they need the maisie then the maisie is powerless. If someone is brusque and they see the maisie then the maisie deck the pinchas. If someone deck the gail then the gail bevel the maisie. If someone is powerless then they see the pinchas. If someone is palladian then they need the maisie. If someone bevel the gail and the gail bevel the pinchas then the gail outfit the maisie. The maisie does not need the gail.", "logic": "\nPalladian(maisie)\nBevel(maisie, gail)\nDeck(maisie, gail)\nOutfit(maisie, gail)\nOutfit(maisie, pinchas)\nPalladian(gail)\nBrusque(gail)\nBevel(gail, pinchas)\nDeck(gail, pinchas)\nnot Deck(pinchas, gail)\nforall x (Deck(x, pinchas) -> Brusque(x))\nforall x (Outfit(x, maisie) and Deck(maisie, pinchas) -> Bevel(pinchas, gail))\nforall x (Bevel(x, gail) and Bevel(x, maisie) -> Powerless(maisie))\nforall x (Brusque(x) and Deck(x, maisie) -> Deck(maisie, pinchas))\nforall x (Deck(x, gail) -> Bevel(gail, maisie))\nforall x (Powerless(x) -> Deck(x, pinchas))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Bevel(x, maisie))\nforall x (Bevel(x, gail) and Bevel(gail, pinchas) -> Outfit(gail, maisie))\n\nnot Bevel(maisie, gail)\n\ntherefore Bevel(maisie, gail)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The carleigh is abused. The carleigh colourise the godfree. The carleigh size the godfree. The carleigh dulcify the godfree. The carleigh dulcify the lidia. The godfree is abused. The godfree is sage. The godfree colourise the lidia. The godfree size the lidia. The lidia does not see the godfree. If someone size the lidia then they are sage. If someone dulcify the carleigh and the carleigh size the lidia then the lidia colourise the godfree. If someone colourise the godfree and they need the carleigh then the carleigh is xliii. If someone is sage and they see the carleigh then the carleigh size the lidia. If someone size the godfree then the godfree colourise the carleigh. If someone is xliii then they see the lidia. If someone is abused then they need the carleigh. If someone colourise the godfree and the godfree colourise the lidia then the godfree dulcify the carleigh. The godfree dulcify the carleigh.", "logic": "\nAbused(carleigh)\nColourise(carleigh, godfree)\nSize(carleigh, godfree)\nDulcify(carleigh, godfree)\nDulcify(carleigh, lidia)\nAbused(godfree)\nSage(godfree)\nColourise(godfree, lidia)\nSize(godfree, lidia)\nnot Size(lidia, godfree)\nforall x (Size(x, lidia) -> Sage(x))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, carleigh) and Size(carleigh, lidia) -> Colourise(lidia, godfree))\nforall x (Colourise(x, godfree) and Colourise(x, carleigh) -> Xliii(carleigh))\nforall x (Sage(x) and Size(x, carleigh) -> Size(carleigh, lidia))\nforall x (Size(x, godfree) -> Colourise(godfree, carleigh))\nforall x (Xliii(x) -> Size(x, lidia))\nforall x (Abused(x) -> Colourise(x, carleigh))\nforall x (Colourise(x, godfree) and Colourise(godfree, lidia) -> Dulcify(godfree, carleigh))\n\nDulcify(godfree, carleigh)\n\nColourise(carleigh, godfree) and Colourise(godfree, lidia) and forall x (Colourise(x, godfree) and Colourise(godfree, lidia) -> Dulcify(godfree, carleigh)) -> therefore Dulcify(godfree, carleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The damita is mocking. The damita gruntle the raymond. The damita shlep the raymond. The damita cybernate the raymond. The damita cybernate the idell. The raymond is mocking. The raymond is miry. The raymond gruntle the idell. The raymond shlep the idell. The idell does not see the raymond. If someone shlep the idell then they are miry. If someone cybernate the damita and the damita shlep the idell then the idell gruntle the raymond. If someone gruntle the raymond and they need the damita then the damita is earthen. If someone is miry and they see the damita then the damita shlep the idell. If someone shlep the raymond then the raymond gruntle the damita. If someone is earthen then they see the idell. If someone is mocking then they need the damita. If someone gruntle the raymond and the raymond gruntle the idell then the raymond cybernate the damita. The raymond does not need the damita.", "logic": "\nMocking(damita)\nGruntle(damita, raymond)\nShlep(damita, raymond)\nCybernate(damita, raymond)\nCybernate(damita, idell)\nMocking(raymond)\nMiry(raymond)\nGruntle(raymond, idell)\nShlep(raymond, idell)\nnot Shlep(idell, raymond)\nforall x (Shlep(x, idell) -> Miry(x))\nforall x (Cybernate(x, damita) and Shlep(damita, idell) -> Gruntle(idell, raymond))\nforall x (Gruntle(x, raymond) and Gruntle(x, damita) -> Earthen(damita))\nforall x (Miry(x) and Shlep(x, damita) -> Shlep(damita, idell))\nforall x (Shlep(x, raymond) -> Gruntle(raymond, damita))\nforall x (Earthen(x) -> Shlep(x, idell))\nforall x (Mocking(x) -> Gruntle(x, damita))\nforall x (Gruntle(x, raymond) and Gruntle(raymond, idell) -> Cybernate(raymond, damita))\n\nnot Gruntle(raymond, damita)\n\nShlep(damita, raymond) and forall x (Shlep(x, raymond) -> Gruntle(raymond, damita)) -> therefore Gruntle(raymond, damita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The ameline is judaical. The ameline bream the janka. The ameline pledge the janka. The ameline prevail the janka. The ameline prevail the bryn. The janka is judaical. The janka is unfrosted. The janka bream the bryn. The janka pledge the bryn. The bryn does not see the janka. If someone pledge the bryn then they are unfrosted. If someone prevail the ameline and the ameline pledge the bryn then the bryn bream the janka. If someone bream the janka and they need the ameline then the ameline is statewide. If someone is unfrosted and they see the ameline then the ameline pledge the bryn. If someone pledge the janka then the janka bream the ameline. If someone is statewide then they see the bryn. If someone is judaical then they need the ameline. If someone bream the janka and the janka bream the bryn then the janka prevail the ameline. The ameline is statewide.", "logic": "\nJudaical(ameline)\nBream(ameline, janka)\nPledge(ameline, janka)\nPrevail(ameline, janka)\nPrevail(ameline, bryn)\nJudaical(janka)\nUnfrosted(janka)\nBream(janka, bryn)\nPledge(janka, bryn)\nnot Pledge(bryn, janka)\nforall x (Pledge(x, bryn) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Prevail(x, ameline) and Pledge(ameline, bryn) -> Bream(bryn, janka))\nforall x (Bream(x, janka) and Bream(x, ameline) -> Statewide(ameline))\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and Pledge(x, ameline) -> Pledge(ameline, bryn))\nforall x (Pledge(x, janka) -> Bream(janka, ameline))\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> Pledge(x, bryn))\nforall x (Judaical(x) -> Bream(x, ameline))\nforall x (Bream(x, janka) and Bream(janka, bryn) -> Prevail(janka, ameline))\n\nStatewide(ameline)\n\nJudaical(ameline) and forall x (Judaical(x) -> Bream(x, ameline)) -> therefore Bream(ameline, ameline) Bream(ameline, janka) and Bream(ameline, ameline) and forall x (Bream(x, janka) and Bream(x, ameline) -> Statewide(ameline)) -> therefore Statewide(ameline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The marilin is argent. The marilin clam the cordey. The marilin authorise the cordey. The marilin blow the cordey. The marilin blow the shelden. The cordey is argent. The cordey is credible. The cordey clam the shelden. The cordey authorise the shelden. The shelden does not see the cordey. If someone authorise the shelden then they are credible. If someone blow the marilin and the marilin authorise the shelden then the shelden clam the cordey. If someone clam the cordey and they need the marilin then the marilin is terse. If someone is credible and they see the marilin then the marilin authorise the shelden. If someone authorise the cordey then the cordey clam the marilin. If someone is terse then they see the shelden. If someone is argent then they need the marilin. If someone clam the cordey and the cordey clam the shelden then the cordey blow the marilin. The marilin is not terse.", "logic": "\nArgent(marilin)\nClam(marilin, cordey)\nAuthorise(marilin, cordey)\nBlow(marilin, cordey)\nBlow(marilin, shelden)\nArgent(cordey)\nCredible(cordey)\nClam(cordey, shelden)\nAuthorise(cordey, shelden)\nnot Authorise(shelden, cordey)\nforall x (Authorise(x, shelden) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Blow(x, marilin) and Authorise(marilin, shelden) -> Clam(shelden, cordey))\nforall x (Clam(x, cordey) and Clam(x, marilin) -> Terse(marilin))\nforall x (Credible(x) and Authorise(x, marilin) -> Authorise(marilin, shelden))\nforall x (Authorise(x, cordey) -> Clam(cordey, marilin))\nforall x (Terse(x) -> Authorise(x, shelden))\nforall x (Argent(x) -> Clam(x, marilin))\nforall x (Clam(x, cordey) and Clam(cordey, shelden) -> Blow(cordey, marilin))\n\nnot Terse(marilin)\n\nArgent(marilin) and forall x (Argent(x) -> Clam(x, marilin)) -> therefore Clam(marilin, marilin) Clam(marilin, cordey) and Clam(marilin, marilin) and forall x (Clam(x, cordey) and Clam(x, marilin) -> Terse(marilin)) -> therefore Terse(marilin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The ariella is convenient. The ariella hunger the cherye. The ariella windsurf the cherye. The ariella coke the cherye. The ariella coke the menard. The cherye is convenient. The cherye is scentless. The cherye hunger the menard. The cherye windsurf the menard. The menard does not see the cherye. If someone windsurf the menard then they are scentless. If someone coke the ariella and the ariella windsurf the menard then the menard hunger the cherye. If someone hunger the cherye and they need the ariella then the ariella is abundant. If someone is scentless and they see the ariella then the ariella windsurf the menard. If someone windsurf the cherye then the cherye hunger the ariella. If someone is abundant then they see the menard. If someone is convenient then they need the ariella. If someone hunger the cherye and the cherye hunger the menard then the cherye coke the ariella. The ariella windsurf the menard.", "logic": "\nConvenient(ariella)\nHunger(ariella, cherye)\nWindsurf(ariella, cherye)\nCoke(ariella, cherye)\nCoke(ariella, menard)\nConvenient(cherye)\nScentless(cherye)\nHunger(cherye, menard)\nWindsurf(cherye, menard)\nnot Windsurf(menard, cherye)\nforall x (Windsurf(x, menard) -> Scentless(x))\nforall x (Coke(x, ariella) and Windsurf(ariella, menard) -> Hunger(menard, cherye))\nforall x (Hunger(x, cherye) and Hunger(x, ariella) -> Abundant(ariella))\nforall x (Scentless(x) and Windsurf(x, ariella) -> Windsurf(ariella, menard))\nforall x (Windsurf(x, cherye) -> Hunger(cherye, ariella))\nforall x (Abundant(x) -> Windsurf(x, menard))\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Hunger(x, ariella))\nforall x (Hunger(x, cherye) and Hunger(cherye, menard) -> Coke(cherye, ariella))\n\nWindsurf(ariella, menard)\n\nConvenient(ariella) and forall x (Convenient(x) -> Hunger(x, ariella)) -> therefore Hunger(ariella, ariella) Hunger(ariella, cherye) and Hunger(ariella, ariella) and forall x (Hunger(x, cherye) and Hunger(x, ariella) -> Abundant(ariella)) -> therefore Abundant(ariella) Abundant(ariella) and forall x (Abundant(x) -> Windsurf(x, menard)) -> therefore Windsurf(ariella, menard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The prent is caesarian. The prent shrimp the morganica. The prent putter the morganica. The prent spirt the morganica. The prent spirt the josy. The morganica is caesarian. The morganica is ungracious. The morganica shrimp the josy. The morganica putter the josy. The josy does not see the morganica. If someone putter the josy then they are ungracious. If someone spirt the prent and the prent putter the josy then the josy shrimp the morganica. If someone shrimp the morganica and they need the prent then the prent is quadruplex. If someone is ungracious and they see the prent then the prent putter the josy. If someone putter the morganica then the morganica shrimp the prent. If someone is quadruplex then they see the josy. If someone is caesarian then they need the prent. If someone shrimp the morganica and the morganica shrimp the josy then the morganica spirt the prent. The prent does not see the josy.", "logic": "\nCaesarian(prent)\nShrimp(prent, morganica)\nPutter(prent, morganica)\nSpirt(prent, morganica)\nSpirt(prent, josy)\nCaesarian(morganica)\nUngracious(morganica)\nShrimp(morganica, josy)\nPutter(morganica, josy)\nnot Putter(josy, morganica)\nforall x (Putter(x, josy) -> Ungracious(x))\nforall x (Spirt(x, prent) and Putter(prent, josy) -> Shrimp(josy, morganica))\nforall x (Shrimp(x, morganica) and Shrimp(x, prent) -> Quadruplex(prent))\nforall x (Ungracious(x) and Putter(x, prent) -> Putter(prent, josy))\nforall x (Putter(x, morganica) -> Shrimp(morganica, prent))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) -> Putter(x, josy))\nforall x (Caesarian(x) -> Shrimp(x, prent))\nforall x (Shrimp(x, morganica) and Shrimp(morganica, josy) -> Spirt(morganica, prent))\n\nnot Putter(prent, josy)\n\nCaesarian(prent) and forall x (Caesarian(x) -> Shrimp(x, prent)) -> therefore Shrimp(prent, prent) Shrimp(prent, morganica) and Shrimp(prent, prent) and forall x (Shrimp(x, morganica) and Shrimp(x, prent) -> Quadruplex(prent)) -> therefore Quadruplex(prent) Quadruplex(prent) and forall x (Quadruplex(x) -> Putter(x, josy)) -> therefore Putter(prent, josy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The sib is abnormal. The sib enchain the valdemar. The sib bituminize the valdemar. The sib rhapsodize the valdemar. The sib rhapsodize the rora. The valdemar is abnormal. The valdemar is amusive. The valdemar enchain the rora. The valdemar bituminize the rora. The rora does not see the valdemar. If someone bituminize the rora then they are amusive. If someone rhapsodize the sib and the sib bituminize the rora then the rora enchain the valdemar. If someone enchain the valdemar and they need the sib then the sib is prosaic. If someone is amusive and they see the sib then the sib bituminize the rora. If someone bituminize the valdemar then the valdemar enchain the sib. If someone is prosaic then they see the rora. If someone is abnormal then they need the sib. If someone enchain the valdemar and the valdemar enchain the rora then the valdemar rhapsodize the sib. The rora does not need the sib.", "logic": "\nAbnormal(sib)\nEnchain(sib, valdemar)\nBituminize(sib, valdemar)\nRhapsodize(sib, valdemar)\nRhapsodize(sib, rora)\nAbnormal(valdemar)\nAmusive(valdemar)\nEnchain(valdemar, rora)\nBituminize(valdemar, rora)\nnot Bituminize(rora, valdemar)\nforall x (Bituminize(x, rora) -> Amusive(x))\nforall x (Rhapsodize(x, sib) and Bituminize(sib, rora) -> Enchain(rora, valdemar))\nforall x (Enchain(x, valdemar) and Enchain(x, sib) -> Prosaic(sib))\nforall x (Amusive(x) and Bituminize(x, sib) -> Bituminize(sib, rora))\nforall x (Bituminize(x, valdemar) -> Enchain(valdemar, sib))\nforall x (Prosaic(x) -> Bituminize(x, rora))\nforall x (Abnormal(x) -> Enchain(x, sib))\nforall x (Enchain(x, valdemar) and Enchain(valdemar, rora) -> Rhapsodize(valdemar, sib))\n\nnot Enchain(rora, sib)\n\nforall x (Abnormal(x) -> Enchain(x, sib)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The janine is midway. The janine indue the debbra. The janine tabulate the debbra. The janine ablactate the debbra. The janine ablactate the melonie. The debbra is midway. The debbra is fragmented. The debbra indue the melonie. The debbra tabulate the melonie. The melonie does not see the debbra. If someone tabulate the melonie then they are fragmented. If someone ablactate the janine and the janine tabulate the melonie then the melonie indue the debbra. If someone indue the debbra and they need the janine then the janine is unequaled. If someone is fragmented and they see the janine then the janine tabulate the melonie. If someone tabulate the debbra then the debbra indue the janine. If someone is unequaled then they see the melonie. If someone is midway then they need the janine. If someone indue the debbra and the debbra indue the melonie then the debbra ablactate the janine. The melonie tabulate the melonie.", "logic": "\nMidway(janine)\nIndue(janine, debbra)\nTabulate(janine, debbra)\nAblactate(janine, debbra)\nAblactate(janine, melonie)\nMidway(debbra)\nFragmented(debbra)\nIndue(debbra, melonie)\nTabulate(debbra, melonie)\nnot Tabulate(melonie, debbra)\nforall x (Tabulate(x, melonie) -> Fragmented(x))\nforall x (Ablactate(x, janine) and Tabulate(janine, melonie) -> Indue(melonie, debbra))\nforall x (Indue(x, debbra) and Indue(x, janine) -> Unequaled(janine))\nforall x (Fragmented(x) and Tabulate(x, janine) -> Tabulate(janine, melonie))\nforall x (Tabulate(x, debbra) -> Indue(debbra, janine))\nforall x (Unequaled(x) -> Tabulate(x, melonie))\nforall x (Midway(x) -> Indue(x, janine))\nforall x (Indue(x, debbra) and Indue(debbra, melonie) -> Ablactate(debbra, janine))\n\nTabulate(melonie, melonie)\n\nforall x (Unequaled(x) -> Tabulate(x, melonie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The roobbie is erectile. The roobbie aerosolise the keene. The roobbie emplace the keene. The roobbie mist the keene. The roobbie mist the nicolette. The keene is erectile. The keene is miasmal. The keene aerosolise the nicolette. The keene emplace the nicolette. The nicolette does not see the keene. If someone emplace the nicolette then they are miasmal. If someone mist the roobbie and the roobbie emplace the nicolette then the nicolette aerosolise the keene. If someone aerosolise the keene and they need the roobbie then the roobbie is hoofed. If someone is miasmal and they see the roobbie then the roobbie emplace the nicolette. If someone emplace the keene then the keene aerosolise the roobbie. If someone is hoofed then they see the nicolette. If someone is erectile then they need the roobbie. If someone aerosolise the keene and the keene aerosolise the nicolette then the keene mist the roobbie. The nicolette is not miasmal.", "logic": "\nErectile(roobbie)\nAerosolise(roobbie, keene)\nEmplace(roobbie, keene)\nMist(roobbie, keene)\nMist(roobbie, nicolette)\nErectile(keene)\nMiasmal(keene)\nAerosolise(keene, nicolette)\nEmplace(keene, nicolette)\nnot Emplace(nicolette, keene)\nforall x (Emplace(x, nicolette) -> Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Mist(x, roobbie) and Emplace(roobbie, nicolette) -> Aerosolise(nicolette, keene))\nforall x (Aerosolise(x, keene) and Aerosolise(x, roobbie) -> Hoofed(roobbie))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Emplace(x, roobbie) -> Emplace(roobbie, nicolette))\nforall x (Emplace(x, keene) -> Aerosolise(keene, roobbie))\nforall x (Hoofed(x) -> Emplace(x, nicolette))\nforall x (Erectile(x) -> Aerosolise(x, roobbie))\nforall x (Aerosolise(x, keene) and Aerosolise(keene, nicolette) -> Mist(keene, roobbie))\n\nnot Miasmal(nicolette)\n\nforall x (Emplace(x, nicolette) -> Miasmal(x)) <- forall x (Hoofed(x) -> Emplace(x, nicolette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The roslyn is gauntleted. The roslyn reseal the cortese. The roslyn sonnet the cortese. The roslyn chart the cortese. The roslyn chart the hugo. The cortese is gauntleted. The cortese is immemorial. The cortese reseal the hugo. The cortese sonnet the hugo. The hugo does not see the cortese. If someone sonnet the hugo then they are immemorial. If someone chart the roslyn and the roslyn sonnet the hugo then the hugo reseal the cortese. If someone reseal the cortese and they need the roslyn then the roslyn is bush. If someone is immemorial and they see the roslyn then the roslyn sonnet the hugo. If someone sonnet the cortese then the cortese reseal the roslyn. If someone is bush then they see the hugo. If someone is gauntleted then they need the roslyn. If someone reseal the cortese and the cortese reseal the hugo then the cortese chart the roslyn. The hugo chart the roslyn.", "logic": "\nGauntleted(roslyn)\nReseal(roslyn, cortese)\nSonnet(roslyn, cortese)\nChart(roslyn, cortese)\nChart(roslyn, hugo)\nGauntleted(cortese)\nImmemorial(cortese)\nReseal(cortese, hugo)\nSonnet(cortese, hugo)\nnot Sonnet(hugo, cortese)\nforall x (Sonnet(x, hugo) -> Immemorial(x))\nforall x (Chart(x, roslyn) and Sonnet(roslyn, hugo) -> Reseal(hugo, cortese))\nforall x (Reseal(x, cortese) and Reseal(x, roslyn) -> Bush(roslyn))\nforall x (Immemorial(x) and Sonnet(x, roslyn) -> Sonnet(roslyn, hugo))\nforall x (Sonnet(x, cortese) -> Reseal(cortese, roslyn))\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Sonnet(x, hugo))\nforall x (Gauntleted(x) -> Reseal(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Reseal(x, cortese) and Reseal(cortese, hugo) -> Chart(cortese, roslyn))\n\nChart(hugo, roslyn)\n\nChart(hugo, roslyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The milena is gnarled. The milena pattern the barnard. The milena pass the barnard. The milena backcross the barnard. The milena backcross the franny. The barnard is gnarled. The barnard is rejoicing. The barnard pattern the franny. The barnard pass the franny. The franny does not see the barnard. If someone pass the franny then they are rejoicing. If someone backcross the milena and the milena pass the franny then the franny pattern the barnard. If someone pattern the barnard and they need the milena then the milena is advance. If someone is rejoicing and they see the milena then the milena pass the franny. If someone pass the barnard then the barnard pattern the milena. If someone is advance then they see the franny. If someone is gnarled then they need the milena. If someone pattern the barnard and the barnard pattern the franny then the barnard backcross the milena. The franny is not green.", "logic": "\nGnarled(milena)\nPattern(milena, barnard)\nPass(milena, barnard)\nBackcross(milena, barnard)\nBackcross(milena, franny)\nGnarled(barnard)\nRejoicing(barnard)\nPattern(barnard, franny)\nPass(barnard, franny)\nnot Pass(franny, barnard)\nforall x (Pass(x, franny) -> Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Backcross(x, milena) and Pass(milena, franny) -> Pattern(franny, barnard))\nforall x (Pattern(x, barnard) and Pattern(x, milena) -> Advance(milena))\nforall x (Rejoicing(x) and Pass(x, milena) -> Pass(milena, franny))\nforall x (Pass(x, barnard) -> Pattern(barnard, milena))\nforall x (Advance(x) -> Pass(x, franny))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) -> Pattern(x, milena))\nforall x (Pattern(x, barnard) and Pattern(barnard, franny) -> Backcross(barnard, milena))\n\nnot Green(franny)\n\nnot Green(franny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The edwin is outlined. The edwin gobble the baillie. The edwin factorise the baillie. The edwin infer the baillie. The edwin infer the davina. The baillie is outlined. The baillie is inaccurate. The baillie gobble the davina. The baillie factorise the davina. The davina does not see the baillie. If someone factorise the davina then they are inaccurate. If someone infer the edwin and the edwin factorise the davina then the davina gobble the baillie. If someone gobble the baillie and they need the edwin then the edwin is adjacent. If someone is inaccurate and they see the edwin then the edwin factorise the davina. If someone factorise the baillie then the baillie gobble the edwin. If someone is adjacent then they see the davina. If someone is outlined then they need the edwin. If someone gobble the baillie and the baillie gobble the davina then the baillie infer the edwin. The davina infer the baillie.", "logic": "\nOutlined(edwin)\nGobble(edwin, baillie)\nFactorise(edwin, baillie)\nInfer(edwin, baillie)\nInfer(edwin, davina)\nOutlined(baillie)\nInaccurate(baillie)\nGobble(baillie, davina)\nFactorise(baillie, davina)\nnot Factorise(davina, baillie)\nforall x (Factorise(x, davina) -> Inaccurate(x))\nforall x (Infer(x, edwin) and Factorise(edwin, davina) -> Gobble(davina, baillie))\nforall x (Gobble(x, baillie) and Gobble(x, edwin) -> Adjacent(edwin))\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) and Factorise(x, edwin) -> Factorise(edwin, davina))\nforall x (Factorise(x, baillie) -> Gobble(baillie, edwin))\nforall x (Adjacent(x) -> Factorise(x, davina))\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> Gobble(x, edwin))\nforall x (Gobble(x, baillie) and Gobble(baillie, davina) -> Infer(baillie, edwin))\n\nInfer(davina, baillie)\n\nInfer(davina, baillie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The maureen is crank. The maureen spacewalk the ahmad. The maureen empathize the ahmad. The maureen recognize the ahmad. The maureen recognize the row. The ahmad is crank. The ahmad is multiplex. The ahmad spacewalk the row. The ahmad empathize the row. The row does not see the ahmad. If someone empathize the row then they are multiplex. If someone recognize the maureen and the maureen empathize the row then the row spacewalk the ahmad. If someone spacewalk the ahmad and they need the maureen then the maureen is hornless. If someone is multiplex and they see the maureen then the maureen empathize the row. If someone empathize the ahmad then the ahmad spacewalk the maureen. If someone is hornless then they see the row. If someone is crank then they need the maureen. If someone spacewalk the ahmad and the ahmad spacewalk the row then the ahmad recognize the maureen. The maureen does not see the maureen.", "logic": "\nCrank(maureen)\nSpacewalk(maureen, ahmad)\nEmpathize(maureen, ahmad)\nRecognize(maureen, ahmad)\nRecognize(maureen, row)\nCrank(ahmad)\nMultiplex(ahmad)\nSpacewalk(ahmad, row)\nEmpathize(ahmad, row)\nnot Empathize(row, ahmad)\nforall x (Empathize(x, row) -> Multiplex(x))\nforall x (Recognize(x, maureen) and Empathize(maureen, row) -> Spacewalk(row, ahmad))\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, ahmad) and Spacewalk(x, maureen) -> Hornless(maureen))\nforall x (Multiplex(x) and Empathize(x, maureen) -> Empathize(maureen, row))\nforall x (Empathize(x, ahmad) -> Spacewalk(ahmad, maureen))\nforall x (Hornless(x) -> Empathize(x, row))\nforall x (Crank(x) -> Spacewalk(x, maureen))\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, ahmad) and Spacewalk(ahmad, row) -> Recognize(ahmad, maureen))\n\nnot Empathize(maureen, maureen)\n\nnot Empathize(maureen, maureen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The rosita is polyatomic. The rosita comment the steve. The rosita astound the steve. The rosita reimpose the steve. The rosita reimpose the spence. The steve is polyatomic. The steve is assumed. The steve comment the spence. The steve astound the spence. The spence does not see the steve. If someone astound the spence then they are assumed. If someone reimpose the rosita and the rosita astound the spence then the spence comment the steve. If someone comment the steve and they need the rosita then the rosita is political. If someone is assumed and they see the rosita then the rosita astound the spence. If someone astound the steve then the steve comment the rosita. If someone is political then they see the spence. If someone is polyatomic then they need the rosita. If someone comment the steve and the steve comment the spence then the steve reimpose the rosita. The rosita is green.", "logic": "\nPolyatomic(rosita)\nComment(rosita, steve)\nAstound(rosita, steve)\nReimpose(rosita, steve)\nReimpose(rosita, spence)\nPolyatomic(steve)\nAssumed(steve)\nComment(steve, spence)\nAstound(steve, spence)\nnot Astound(spence, steve)\nforall x (Astound(x, spence) -> Assumed(x))\nforall x (Reimpose(x, rosita) and Astound(rosita, spence) -> Comment(spence, steve))\nforall x (Comment(x, steve) and Comment(x, rosita) -> Political(rosita))\nforall x (Assumed(x) and Astound(x, rosita) -> Astound(rosita, spence))\nforall x (Astound(x, steve) -> Comment(steve, rosita))\nforall x (Political(x) -> Astound(x, spence))\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Comment(x, rosita))\nforall x (Comment(x, steve) and Comment(steve, spence) -> Reimpose(steve, rosita))\n\nGreen(rosita)\n\nGreen(rosita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "Fowler is pucka. Fowler is matt. Mortie is echoic. Mortie is historic. Mortie is extempore. Wilek is pucka. Wilek is matt. If someone is pucka and dismal then they are echoic. White people are echoic. If someone is pucka then they are echoic. All dismal people are echoic. If someone is pucka and echoic then they are dismal. All echoic people are extempore. Nice, historic people are matt. White people are laureled. Fowler is matt.", "logic": "\nPucka(fowler)\nMatt(fowler)\nEchoic(mortie)\nHistoric(mortie)\nExtempore(mortie)\nPucka(wilek)\nMatt(wilek)\nforall x (Pucka(x) and Dismal(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Extempore(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Pucka(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Dismal(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Pucka(x) and Echoic(x) -> Dismal(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) -> Extempore(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) and Historic(x) -> Matt(x))\nforall x (Extempore(x) -> Laureled(x))\n\nMatt(fowler)\n\ntherefore Matt(fowler)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Alane is dread. Alane is tutelary. Robinett is blistering. Robinett is castrated. Robinett is ebullient. Corry is dread. Corry is tutelary. If someone is dread and resinous then they are blistering. White people are blistering. If someone is dread then they are blistering. All resinous people are blistering. If someone is dread and blistering then they are resinous. All blistering people are ebullient. Nice, castrated people are tutelary. White people are aphoristic. Corry is not tutelary.", "logic": "\nDread(alane)\nTutelary(alane)\nBlistering(robinett)\nCastrated(robinett)\nEbullient(robinett)\nDread(corry)\nTutelary(corry)\nforall x (Dread(x) and Resinous(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Ebullient(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Dread(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Resinous(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Dread(x) and Blistering(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Blistering(x) -> Ebullient(x))\nforall x (Blistering(x) and Castrated(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Ebullient(x) -> Aphoristic(x))\n\nnot Tutelary(corry)\n\ntherefore Tutelary(corry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Kerrill is rancorous. Kerrill is virtuoso. Karlen is stunning. Karlen is nonnative. Karlen is norman. Corie is rancorous. Corie is virtuoso. If someone is rancorous and unkindled then they are stunning. White people are stunning. If someone is rancorous then they are stunning. All unkindled people are stunning. If someone is rancorous and stunning then they are unkindled. All stunning people are norman. Nice, nonnative people are virtuoso. White people are scrabbly. Kerrill is stunning.", "logic": "\nRancorous(kerrill)\nVirtuoso(kerrill)\nStunning(karlen)\nNonnative(karlen)\nNorman(karlen)\nRancorous(corie)\nVirtuoso(corie)\nforall x (Rancorous(x) and Unkindled(x) -> Stunning(x))\nforall x (Norman(x) -> Stunning(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) -> Stunning(x))\nforall x (Unkindled(x) -> Stunning(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) and Stunning(x) -> Unkindled(x))\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Norman(x))\nforall x (Stunning(x) and Nonnative(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Norman(x) -> Scrabbly(x))\n\nStunning(kerrill)\n\nRancorous(kerrill) and forall x (Rancorous(x) -> Stunning(x)) -> therefore Stunning(kerrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Lust is innocuous. Lust is undated. Cordie is bottom. Cordie is haploid. Cordie is sick. Anni is innocuous. Anni is undated. If someone is innocuous and starchlike then they are bottom. White people are bottom. If someone is innocuous then they are bottom. All starchlike people are bottom. If someone is innocuous and bottom then they are starchlike. All bottom people are sick. Nice, haploid people are undated. White people are currish. Anni is not bottom.", "logic": "\nInnocuous(lust)\nUndated(lust)\nBottom(cordie)\nHaploid(cordie)\nSick(cordie)\nInnocuous(anni)\nUndated(anni)\nforall x (Innocuous(x) and Starchlike(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Sick(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Starchlike(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) and Bottom(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nforall x (Bottom(x) -> Sick(x))\nforall x (Bottom(x) and Haploid(x) -> Undated(x))\nforall x (Sick(x) -> Currish(x))\n\nnot Bottom(anni)\n\nInnocuous(anni) and forall x (Innocuous(x) -> Bottom(x)) -> therefore Bottom(anni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Hamlin is hindustani. Hamlin is leisured. Natalee is adrenal. Natalee is lustrous. Natalee is refined. Susie is hindustani. Susie is leisured. If someone is hindustani and opulent then they are adrenal. White people are adrenal. If someone is hindustani then they are adrenal. All opulent people are adrenal. If someone is hindustani and adrenal then they are opulent. All adrenal people are refined. Nice, lustrous people are leisured. White people are theoretic. Hamlin is opulent.", "logic": "\nHindustani(hamlin)\nLeisured(hamlin)\nAdrenal(natalee)\nLustrous(natalee)\nRefined(natalee)\nHindustani(susie)\nLeisured(susie)\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Opulent(x) -> Adrenal(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Adrenal(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) -> Adrenal(x))\nforall x (Opulent(x) -> Adrenal(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Adrenal(x) -> Opulent(x))\nforall x (Adrenal(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Adrenal(x) and Lustrous(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Theoretic(x))\n\nOpulent(hamlin)\n\nHindustani(hamlin) and forall x (Hindustani(x) -> Adrenal(x)) -> therefore Adrenal(hamlin) Hindustani(hamlin) and Adrenal(hamlin) and forall x (Hindustani(x) and Adrenal(x) -> Opulent(x)) -> therefore Opulent(hamlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Keene is unfretted. Keene is scalene. Bobbie is personable. Bobbie is linnean. Bobbie is conveyable. Ethelbert is unfretted. Ethelbert is scalene. If someone is unfretted and achievable then they are personable. White people are personable. If someone is unfretted then they are personable. All achievable people are personable. If someone is unfretted and personable then they are achievable. All personable people are conveyable. Nice, linnean people are scalene. White people are unliveable. Keene is not achievable.", "logic": "\nUnfretted(keene)\nScalene(keene)\nPersonable(bobbie)\nLinnean(bobbie)\nConveyable(bobbie)\nUnfretted(ethelbert)\nScalene(ethelbert)\nforall x (Unfretted(x) and Achievable(x) -> Personable(x))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Personable(x))\nforall x (Unfretted(x) -> Personable(x))\nforall x (Achievable(x) -> Personable(x))\nforall x (Unfretted(x) and Personable(x) -> Achievable(x))\nforall x (Personable(x) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Personable(x) and Linnean(x) -> Scalene(x))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Unliveable(x))\n\nnot Achievable(keene)\n\nUnfretted(keene) and forall x (Unfretted(x) -> Personable(x)) -> therefore Personable(keene) Unfretted(keene) and Personable(keene) and forall x (Unfretted(x) and Personable(x) -> Achievable(x)) -> therefore Achievable(keene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Jasmine is unfeigned. Jasmine is buttoned. Darth is fiery. Darth is gabonese. Darth is thespian. Hannibal is unfeigned. Hannibal is buttoned. If someone is unfeigned and greenhouse then they are fiery. White people are fiery. If someone is unfeigned then they are fiery. All greenhouse people are fiery. If someone is unfeigned and fiery then they are greenhouse. All fiery people are thespian. Nice, gabonese people are buttoned. White people are politic. Jasmine is politic.", "logic": "\nUnfeigned(jasmine)\nButtoned(jasmine)\nFiery(darth)\nGabonese(darth)\nThespian(darth)\nUnfeigned(hannibal)\nButtoned(hannibal)\nforall x (Unfeigned(x) and Greenhouse(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Unfeigned(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) -> Fiery(x))\nforall x (Unfeigned(x) and Fiery(x) -> Greenhouse(x))\nforall x (Fiery(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (Fiery(x) and Gabonese(x) -> Buttoned(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) -> Politic(x))\n\nPolitic(jasmine)\n\nUnfeigned(jasmine) and forall x (Unfeigned(x) -> Fiery(x)) -> therefore Fiery(jasmine) Fiery(jasmine) and forall x (Fiery(x) -> Thespian(x)) -> therefore Thespian(jasmine) Thespian(jasmine) and forall x (Thespian(x) -> Politic(x)) -> therefore Politic(jasmine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Vonny is unalert. Vonny is vinaceous. Elene is sparse. Elene is sublime. Elene is paediatric. Gipsy is unalert. Gipsy is vinaceous. If someone is unalert and ribbed then they are sparse. White people are sparse. If someone is unalert then they are sparse. All ribbed people are sparse. If someone is unalert and sparse then they are ribbed. All sparse people are paediatric. Nice, sublime people are vinaceous. White people are calamitous. Vonny is not calamitous.", "logic": "\nUnalert(vonny)\nVinaceous(vonny)\nSparse(elene)\nSublime(elene)\nPaediatric(elene)\nUnalert(gipsy)\nVinaceous(gipsy)\nforall x (Unalert(x) and Ribbed(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Ribbed(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) and Sparse(x) -> Ribbed(x))\nforall x (Sparse(x) -> Paediatric(x))\nforall x (Sparse(x) and Sublime(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) -> Calamitous(x))\n\nnot Calamitous(vonny)\n\nUnalert(vonny) and forall x (Unalert(x) -> Sparse(x)) -> therefore Sparse(vonny) Sparse(vonny) and forall x (Sparse(x) -> Paediatric(x)) -> therefore Paediatric(vonny) Paediatric(vonny) and forall x (Paediatric(x) -> Calamitous(x)) -> therefore Calamitous(vonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Salvidor is exact. Salvidor is anaplastic. Chas is unspent. Chas is alkahestic. Chas is medium. Harvard is exact. Harvard is anaplastic. If someone is exact and xxvi then they are unspent. White people are unspent. If someone is exact then they are unspent. All xxvi people are unspent. If someone is exact and unspent then they are xxvi. All unspent people are medium. Nice, alkahestic people are anaplastic. White people are scythian. Chas is not xxvi.", "logic": "\nExact(salvidor)\nAnaplastic(salvidor)\nUnspent(chas)\nAlkahestic(chas)\nMedium(chas)\nExact(harvard)\nAnaplastic(harvard)\nforall x (Exact(x) and Xxvi(x) -> Unspent(x))\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Unspent(x))\nforall x (Exact(x) -> Unspent(x))\nforall x (Xxvi(x) -> Unspent(x))\nforall x (Exact(x) and Unspent(x) -> Xxvi(x))\nforall x (Unspent(x) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Unspent(x) and Alkahestic(x) -> Anaplastic(x))\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Scythian(x))\n\nnot Xxvi(chas)\n\nforall x (Exact(x) and Unspent(x) -> Xxvi(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Clotilda is maledict. Clotilda is pavlovian. Odele is private. Odele is spoiled. Odele is jewelled. Stormy is maledict. Stormy is pavlovian. If someone is maledict and slangy then they are private. White people are private. If someone is maledict then they are private. All slangy people are private. If someone is maledict and private then they are slangy. All private people are jewelled. Nice, spoiled people are pavlovian. White people are biaxal. Stormy is spoiled.", "logic": "\nMaledict(clotilda)\nPavlovian(clotilda)\nPrivate(odele)\nSpoiled(odele)\nJewelled(odele)\nMaledict(stormy)\nPavlovian(stormy)\nforall x (Maledict(x) and Slangy(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Maledict(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Slangy(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Maledict(x) and Private(x) -> Slangy(x))\nforall x (Private(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nforall x (Private(x) and Spoiled(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Biaxal(x))\n\nSpoiled(stormy)\n\nSpoiled(stormy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Torey is weeklong. Torey is bondable. Rosetta is corrigible. Rosetta is earned. Rosetta is taboo. Tia is weeklong. Tia is bondable. If someone is weeklong and rust then they are corrigible. White people are corrigible. If someone is weeklong then they are corrigible. All rust people are corrigible. If someone is weeklong and corrigible then they are rust. All corrigible people are taboo. Nice, earned people are bondable. White people are unsteady. Rosetta is not weeklong.", "logic": "\nWeeklong(torey)\nBondable(torey)\nCorrigible(rosetta)\nEarned(rosetta)\nTaboo(rosetta)\nWeeklong(tia)\nBondable(tia)\nforall x (Weeklong(x) and Rust(x) -> Corrigible(x))\nforall x (Taboo(x) -> Corrigible(x))\nforall x (Weeklong(x) -> Corrigible(x))\nforall x (Rust(x) -> Corrigible(x))\nforall x (Weeklong(x) and Corrigible(x) -> Rust(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) -> Taboo(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) and Earned(x) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Taboo(x) -> Unsteady(x))\n\nnot Weeklong(rosetta)\n\nnot Weeklong(rosetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Pryce is subsequent. Pryce is unmade. Putnam is cropped. Putnam is copasetic. Putnam is tectonic. Sybila is subsequent. Sybila is unmade. If someone is subsequent and copacetic then they are cropped. White people are cropped. If someone is subsequent then they are cropped. All copacetic people are cropped. If someone is subsequent and cropped then they are copacetic. All cropped people are tectonic. Nice, copasetic people are unmade. White people are volcanic. Pryce is copasetic.", "logic": "\nSubsequent(pryce)\nUnmade(pryce)\nCropped(putnam)\nCopasetic(putnam)\nTectonic(putnam)\nSubsequent(sybila)\nUnmade(sybila)\nforall x (Subsequent(x) and Copacetic(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Subsequent(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Subsequent(x) and Cropped(x) -> Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Cropped(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Cropped(x) and Copasetic(x) -> Unmade(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Volcanic(x))\n\nCopasetic(pryce)\n\nCopasetic(pryce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "The calla punctuate the lottie. The calla punctuate the noelyn. The calla want the lottie. The calla is altissimo. The calla is imitative. The calla pray the noelyn. The lottie punctuate the noelyn. The lottie is altissimo. The lottie is imitative. The lottie is aerobic. The lottie is chapleted. The lottie pray the noelyn. The noelyn is nonnomadic. The noelyn pray the calla. The noelyn pray the lottie. If someone want the lottie and the lottie is aerobic then the lottie pray the calla. If someone is aerobic then they chase the lottie. If someone want the noelyn and they chase the calla then the calla is nonnomadic. If someone is aerobic then they eat the lottie. If someone pray the calla then they eat the noelyn. If the noelyn want the lottie and the noelyn pray the calla then the noelyn punctuate the calla. If someone is imitative and they visit the calla then the calla is chapleted. If someone is nonnomadic then they chase the calla. The lottie is chapleted.", "logic": "\nPunctuate(calla, lottie)\nPunctuate(calla, noelyn)\nWant(calla, lottie)\nAltissimo(calla)\nImitative(calla)\nPray(calla, noelyn)\nPunctuate(lottie, noelyn)\nAltissimo(lottie)\nImitative(lottie)\nAerobic(lottie)\nChapleted(lottie)\nPray(lottie, noelyn)\nNonnomadic(noelyn)\nPray(noelyn, calla)\nPray(noelyn, lottie)\nforall x (Want(x, lottie) and Aerobic(lottie) -> Pray(lottie, calla))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Punctuate(x, lottie))\nforall x (Want(x, noelyn) and Punctuate(x, calla) -> Nonnomadic(calla))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Want(x, lottie))\nforall x (Pray(x, calla) -> Want(x, noelyn))\nWant(noelyn, lottie) and Pray(noelyn, calla) -> Punctuate(noelyn, calla)\nforall x (Imitative(x) and Pray(x, calla) -> Chapleted(calla))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Punctuate(x, calla))\n\nChapleted(lottie)\n\ntherefore Chapleted(lottie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The joy devalue the way. The joy devalue the jocelyn. The joy disoblige the way. The joy is buckram. The joy is astigmatic. The joy summarise the jocelyn. The way devalue the jocelyn. The way is buckram. The way is astigmatic. The way is malignant. The way is ingrained. The way summarise the jocelyn. The jocelyn is unfading. The jocelyn summarise the joy. The jocelyn summarise the way. If someone disoblige the way and the way is malignant then the way summarise the joy. If someone is malignant then they chase the way. If someone disoblige the jocelyn and they chase the joy then the joy is unfading. If someone is malignant then they eat the way. If someone summarise the joy then they eat the jocelyn. If the jocelyn disoblige the way and the jocelyn summarise the joy then the jocelyn devalue the joy. If someone is astigmatic and they visit the joy then the joy is ingrained. If someone is unfading then they chase the joy. The way is not buckram.", "logic": "\nDevalue(joy, way)\nDevalue(joy, jocelyn)\nDisoblige(joy, way)\nBuckram(joy)\nAstigmatic(joy)\nSummarise(joy, jocelyn)\nDevalue(way, jocelyn)\nBuckram(way)\nAstigmatic(way)\nMalignant(way)\nIngrained(way)\nSummarise(way, jocelyn)\nUnfading(jocelyn)\nSummarise(jocelyn, joy)\nSummarise(jocelyn, way)\nforall x (Disoblige(x, way) and Malignant(way) -> Summarise(way, joy))\nforall x (Malignant(x) -> Devalue(x, way))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, jocelyn) and Devalue(x, joy) -> Unfading(joy))\nforall x (Malignant(x) -> Disoblige(x, way))\nforall x (Summarise(x, joy) -> Disoblige(x, jocelyn))\nDisoblige(jocelyn, way) and Summarise(jocelyn, joy) -> Devalue(jocelyn, joy)\nforall x (Astigmatic(x) and Summarise(x, joy) -> Ingrained(joy))\nforall x (Unfading(x) -> Devalue(x, joy))\n\nnot Buckram(way)\n\ntherefore Buckram(way)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The loise dawn the bryon. The loise dawn the hiram. The loise sire the bryon. The loise is vulpecular. The loise is corded. The loise intercede the hiram. The bryon dawn the hiram. The bryon is vulpecular. The bryon is corded. The bryon is bronze. The bryon is parous. The bryon intercede the hiram. The hiram is secluded. The hiram intercede the loise. The hiram intercede the bryon. If someone sire the bryon and the bryon is bronze then the bryon intercede the loise. If someone is bronze then they chase the bryon. If someone sire the hiram and they chase the loise then the loise is secluded. If someone is bronze then they eat the bryon. If someone intercede the loise then they eat the hiram. If the hiram sire the bryon and the hiram intercede the loise then the hiram dawn the loise. If someone is corded and they visit the loise then the loise is parous. If someone is secluded then they chase the loise. The bryon dawn the bryon.", "logic": "\nDawn(loise, bryon)\nDawn(loise, hiram)\nSire(loise, bryon)\nVulpecular(loise)\nCorded(loise)\nIntercede(loise, hiram)\nDawn(bryon, hiram)\nVulpecular(bryon)\nCorded(bryon)\nBronze(bryon)\nParous(bryon)\nIntercede(bryon, hiram)\nSecluded(hiram)\nIntercede(hiram, loise)\nIntercede(hiram, bryon)\nforall x (Sire(x, bryon) and Bronze(bryon) -> Intercede(bryon, loise))\nforall x (Bronze(x) -> Dawn(x, bryon))\nforall x (Sire(x, hiram) and Dawn(x, loise) -> Secluded(loise))\nforall x (Bronze(x) -> Sire(x, bryon))\nforall x (Intercede(x, loise) -> Sire(x, hiram))\nSire(hiram, bryon) and Intercede(hiram, loise) -> Dawn(hiram, loise)\nforall x (Corded(x) and Intercede(x, loise) -> Parous(loise))\nforall x (Secluded(x) -> Dawn(x, loise))\n\nDawn(bryon, bryon)\n\nBronze(bryon) and forall x (Bronze(x) -> Dawn(x, bryon)) -> therefore Dawn(bryon, bryon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The siward pullulate the inga. The siward pullulate the renault. The siward singsong the inga. The siward is adnexal. The siward is ancestral. The siward laicize the renault. The inga pullulate the renault. The inga is adnexal. The inga is ancestral. The inga is unrewarded. The inga is synclinal. The inga laicize the renault. The renault is crabbed. The renault laicize the siward. The renault laicize the inga. If someone singsong the inga and the inga is unrewarded then the inga laicize the siward. If someone is unrewarded then they chase the inga. If someone singsong the renault and they chase the siward then the siward is crabbed. If someone is unrewarded then they eat the inga. If someone laicize the siward then they eat the renault. If the renault singsong the inga and the renault laicize the siward then the renault pullulate the siward. If someone is ancestral and they visit the siward then the siward is synclinal. If someone is crabbed then they chase the siward. The renault does not chase the siward.", "logic": "\nPullulate(siward, inga)\nPullulate(siward, renault)\nSingsong(siward, inga)\nAdnexal(siward)\nAncestral(siward)\nLaicize(siward, renault)\nPullulate(inga, renault)\nAdnexal(inga)\nAncestral(inga)\nUnrewarded(inga)\nSynclinal(inga)\nLaicize(inga, renault)\nCrabbed(renault)\nLaicize(renault, siward)\nLaicize(renault, inga)\nforall x (Singsong(x, inga) and Unrewarded(inga) -> Laicize(inga, siward))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Pullulate(x, inga))\nforall x (Singsong(x, renault) and Pullulate(x, siward) -> Crabbed(siward))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Singsong(x, inga))\nforall x (Laicize(x, siward) -> Singsong(x, renault))\nSingsong(renault, inga) and Laicize(renault, siward) -> Pullulate(renault, siward)\nforall x (Ancestral(x) and Laicize(x, siward) -> Synclinal(siward))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Pullulate(x, siward))\n\nnot Pullulate(renault, siward)\n\nCrabbed(renault) and forall x (Crabbed(x) -> Pullulate(x, siward)) -> therefore Pullulate(renault, siward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The marena weld the greer. The marena weld the kali. The marena lull the greer. The marena is thawed. The marena is flippant. The marena rename the kali. The greer weld the kali. The greer is thawed. The greer is flippant. The greer is maroc. The greer is unnerved. The greer rename the kali. The kali is concave. The kali rename the marena. The kali rename the greer. If someone lull the greer and the greer is maroc then the greer rename the marena. If someone is maroc then they chase the greer. If someone lull the kali and they chase the marena then the marena is concave. If someone is maroc then they eat the greer. If someone rename the marena then they eat the kali. If the kali lull the greer and the kali rename the marena then the kali weld the marena. If someone is flippant and they visit the marena then the marena is unnerved. If someone is concave then they chase the marena. The greer lull the kali.", "logic": "\nWeld(marena, greer)\nWeld(marena, kali)\nLull(marena, greer)\nThawed(marena)\nFlippant(marena)\nRename(marena, kali)\nWeld(greer, kali)\nThawed(greer)\nFlippant(greer)\nMaroc(greer)\nUnnerved(greer)\nRename(greer, kali)\nConcave(kali)\nRename(kali, marena)\nRename(kali, greer)\nforall x (Lull(x, greer) and Maroc(greer) -> Rename(greer, marena))\nforall x (Maroc(x) -> Weld(x, greer))\nforall x (Lull(x, kali) and Weld(x, marena) -> Concave(marena))\nforall x (Maroc(x) -> Lull(x, greer))\nforall x (Rename(x, marena) -> Lull(x, kali))\nLull(kali, greer) and Rename(kali, marena) -> Weld(kali, marena)\nforall x (Flippant(x) and Rename(x, marena) -> Unnerved(marena))\nforall x (Concave(x) -> Weld(x, marena))\n\nLull(greer, kali)\n\nLull(marena, greer) and Maroc(greer) and forall x (Lull(x, greer) and Maroc(greer) -> Rename(greer, marena)) -> therefore Rename(greer, marena) Rename(greer, marena) and forall x (Rename(x, marena) -> Lull(x, kali)) -> therefore Lull(greer, kali)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The kyla franchise the baldwin. The kyla franchise the channa. The kyla apotheose the baldwin. The kyla is forked. The kyla is lordly. The kyla pace the channa. The baldwin franchise the channa. The baldwin is forked. The baldwin is lordly. The baldwin is hexed. The baldwin is atonic. The baldwin pace the channa. The channa is enzootic. The channa pace the kyla. The channa pace the baldwin. If someone apotheose the baldwin and the baldwin is hexed then the baldwin pace the kyla. If someone is hexed then they chase the baldwin. If someone apotheose the channa and they chase the kyla then the kyla is enzootic. If someone is hexed then they eat the baldwin. If someone pace the kyla then they eat the channa. If the channa apotheose the baldwin and the channa pace the kyla then the channa franchise the kyla. If someone is lordly and they visit the kyla then the kyla is atonic. If someone is enzootic then they chase the kyla. The kyla is not atonic.", "logic": "\nFranchise(kyla, baldwin)\nFranchise(kyla, channa)\nApotheose(kyla, baldwin)\nForked(kyla)\nLordly(kyla)\nPace(kyla, channa)\nFranchise(baldwin, channa)\nForked(baldwin)\nLordly(baldwin)\nHexed(baldwin)\nAtonic(baldwin)\nPace(baldwin, channa)\nEnzootic(channa)\nPace(channa, kyla)\nPace(channa, baldwin)\nforall x (Apotheose(x, baldwin) and Hexed(baldwin) -> Pace(baldwin, kyla))\nforall x (Hexed(x) -> Franchise(x, baldwin))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, channa) and Franchise(x, kyla) -> Enzootic(kyla))\nforall x (Hexed(x) -> Apotheose(x, baldwin))\nforall x (Pace(x, kyla) -> Apotheose(x, channa))\nApotheose(channa, baldwin) and Pace(channa, kyla) -> Franchise(channa, kyla)\nforall x (Lordly(x) and Pace(x, kyla) -> Atonic(kyla))\nforall x (Enzootic(x) -> Franchise(x, kyla))\n\nnot Atonic(kyla)\n\nApotheose(kyla, baldwin) and Hexed(baldwin) and forall x (Apotheose(x, baldwin) and Hexed(baldwin) -> Pace(baldwin, kyla)) -> therefore Pace(baldwin, kyla) Lordly(baldwin) and Pace(baldwin, kyla) and forall x (Lordly(x) and Pace(x, kyla) -> Atonic(kyla)) -> therefore Atonic(kyla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The corry loot the agna. The corry loot the dori. The corry drowse the agna. The corry is gusty. The corry is orbiculate. The corry exasperate the dori. The agna loot the dori. The agna is gusty. The agna is orbiculate. The agna is glistering. The agna is invariable. The agna exasperate the dori. The dori is exoteric. The dori exasperate the corry. The dori exasperate the agna. If someone drowse the agna and the agna is glistering then the agna exasperate the corry. If someone is glistering then they chase the agna. If someone drowse the dori and they chase the corry then the corry is exoteric. If someone is glistering then they eat the agna. If someone exasperate the corry then they eat the dori. If the dori drowse the agna and the dori exasperate the corry then the dori loot the corry. If someone is orbiculate and they visit the corry then the corry is invariable. If someone is exoteric then they chase the corry. The corry loot the corry.", "logic": "\nLoot(corry, agna)\nLoot(corry, dori)\nDrowse(corry, agna)\nGusty(corry)\nOrbiculate(corry)\nExasperate(corry, dori)\nLoot(agna, dori)\nGusty(agna)\nOrbiculate(agna)\nGlistering(agna)\nInvariable(agna)\nExasperate(agna, dori)\nExoteric(dori)\nExasperate(dori, corry)\nExasperate(dori, agna)\nforall x (Drowse(x, agna) and Glistering(agna) -> Exasperate(agna, corry))\nforall x (Glistering(x) -> Loot(x, agna))\nforall x (Drowse(x, dori) and Loot(x, corry) -> Exoteric(corry))\nforall x (Glistering(x) -> Drowse(x, agna))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, corry) -> Drowse(x, dori))\nDrowse(dori, agna) and Exasperate(dori, corry) -> Loot(dori, corry)\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and Exasperate(x, corry) -> Invariable(corry))\nforall x (Exoteric(x) -> Loot(x, corry))\n\nLoot(corry, corry)\n\nExasperate(dori, corry) and forall x (Exasperate(x, corry) -> Drowse(x, dori)) -> therefore Drowse(dori, dori) Exoteric(dori) and forall x (Exoteric(x) -> Loot(x, corry)) -> therefore Loot(dori, corry) Drowse(dori, dori) and Loot(dori, corry) and forall x (Drowse(x, dori) and Loot(x, corry) -> Exoteric(corry)) -> therefore Exoteric(corry) Exoteric(corry) and forall x (Exoteric(x) -> Loot(x, corry)) -> therefore Loot(corry, corry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The muriel chuckle the queenie. The muriel chuckle the bevvy. The muriel baffle the queenie. The muriel is flatbottom. The muriel is glace. The muriel enplane the bevvy. The queenie chuckle the bevvy. The queenie is flatbottom. The queenie is glace. The queenie is tinpot. The queenie is toothy. The queenie enplane the bevvy. The bevvy is foodless. The bevvy enplane the muriel. The bevvy enplane the queenie. If someone baffle the queenie and the queenie is tinpot then the queenie enplane the muriel. If someone is tinpot then they chase the queenie. If someone baffle the bevvy and they chase the muriel then the muriel is foodless. If someone is tinpot then they eat the queenie. If someone enplane the muriel then they eat the bevvy. If the bevvy baffle the queenie and the bevvy enplane the muriel then the bevvy chuckle the muriel. If someone is glace and they visit the muriel then the muriel is toothy. If someone is foodless then they chase the muriel. The muriel does not chase the muriel.", "logic": "\nChuckle(muriel, queenie)\nChuckle(muriel, bevvy)\nBaffle(muriel, queenie)\nFlatbottom(muriel)\nGlace(muriel)\nEnplane(muriel, bevvy)\nChuckle(queenie, bevvy)\nFlatbottom(queenie)\nGlace(queenie)\nTinpot(queenie)\nToothy(queenie)\nEnplane(queenie, bevvy)\nFoodless(bevvy)\nEnplane(bevvy, muriel)\nEnplane(bevvy, queenie)\nforall x (Baffle(x, queenie) and Tinpot(queenie) -> Enplane(queenie, muriel))\nforall x (Tinpot(x) -> Chuckle(x, queenie))\nforall x (Baffle(x, bevvy) and Chuckle(x, muriel) -> Foodless(muriel))\nforall x (Tinpot(x) -> Baffle(x, queenie))\nforall x (Enplane(x, muriel) -> Baffle(x, bevvy))\nBaffle(bevvy, queenie) and Enplane(bevvy, muriel) -> Chuckle(bevvy, muriel)\nforall x (Glace(x) and Enplane(x, muriel) -> Toothy(muriel))\nforall x (Foodless(x) -> Chuckle(x, muriel))\n\nnot Chuckle(muriel, muriel)\n\nEnplane(bevvy, muriel) and forall x (Enplane(x, muriel) -> Baffle(x, bevvy)) -> therefore Baffle(bevvy, bevvy) Foodless(bevvy) and forall x (Foodless(x) -> Chuckle(x, muriel)) -> therefore Chuckle(bevvy, muriel) Baffle(bevvy, bevvy) and Chuckle(bevvy, muriel) and forall x (Baffle(x, bevvy) and Chuckle(x, muriel) -> Foodless(muriel)) -> therefore Foodless(muriel) Foodless(muriel) and forall x (Foodless(x) -> Chuckle(x, muriel)) -> therefore Chuckle(muriel, muriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The onida clasp the zorro. The onida clasp the joanna. The onida bait the zorro. The onida is relational. The onida is idiopathic. The onida unloosen the joanna. The zorro clasp the joanna. The zorro is relational. The zorro is idiopathic. The zorro is marine. The zorro is unruly. The zorro unloosen the joanna. The joanna is maximizing. The joanna unloosen the onida. The joanna unloosen the zorro. If someone bait the zorro and the zorro is marine then the zorro unloosen the onida. If someone is marine then they chase the zorro. If someone bait the joanna and they chase the onida then the onida is maximizing. If someone is marine then they eat the zorro. If someone unloosen the onida then they eat the joanna. If the joanna bait the zorro and the joanna unloosen the onida then the joanna clasp the onida. If someone is idiopathic and they visit the onida then the onida is unruly. If someone is maximizing then they chase the onida. The joanna does not eat the zorro.", "logic": "\nClasp(onida, zorro)\nClasp(onida, joanna)\nBait(onida, zorro)\nRelational(onida)\nIdiopathic(onida)\nUnloosen(onida, joanna)\nClasp(zorro, joanna)\nRelational(zorro)\nIdiopathic(zorro)\nMarine(zorro)\nUnruly(zorro)\nUnloosen(zorro, joanna)\nMaximizing(joanna)\nUnloosen(joanna, onida)\nUnloosen(joanna, zorro)\nforall x (Bait(x, zorro) and Marine(zorro) -> Unloosen(zorro, onida))\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Clasp(x, zorro))\nforall x (Bait(x, joanna) and Clasp(x, onida) -> Maximizing(onida))\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Bait(x, zorro))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, onida) -> Bait(x, joanna))\nBait(joanna, zorro) and Unloosen(joanna, onida) -> Clasp(joanna, onida)\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) and Unloosen(x, onida) -> Unruly(onida))\nforall x (Maximizing(x) -> Clasp(x, onida))\n\nnot Bait(joanna, zorro)\n\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Bait(x, zorro)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The tallie girdle the salvatore. The tallie girdle the bryan. The tallie galvanize the salvatore. The tallie is axile. The tallie is creole. The tallie twitch the bryan. The salvatore girdle the bryan. The salvatore is axile. The salvatore is creole. The salvatore is smug. The salvatore is undercover. The salvatore twitch the bryan. The bryan is perplexed. The bryan twitch the tallie. The bryan twitch the salvatore. If someone galvanize the salvatore and the salvatore is smug then the salvatore twitch the tallie. If someone is smug then they chase the salvatore. If someone galvanize the bryan and they chase the tallie then the tallie is perplexed. If someone is smug then they eat the salvatore. If someone twitch the tallie then they eat the bryan. If the bryan galvanize the salvatore and the bryan twitch the tallie then the bryan girdle the tallie. If someone is creole and they visit the tallie then the tallie is undercover. If someone is perplexed then they chase the tallie. The salvatore girdle the tallie.", "logic": "\nGirdle(tallie, salvatore)\nGirdle(tallie, bryan)\nGalvanize(tallie, salvatore)\nAxile(tallie)\nCreole(tallie)\nTwitch(tallie, bryan)\nGirdle(salvatore, bryan)\nAxile(salvatore)\nCreole(salvatore)\nSmug(salvatore)\nUndercover(salvatore)\nTwitch(salvatore, bryan)\nPerplexed(bryan)\nTwitch(bryan, tallie)\nTwitch(bryan, salvatore)\nforall x (Galvanize(x, salvatore) and Smug(salvatore) -> Twitch(salvatore, tallie))\nforall x (Smug(x) -> Girdle(x, salvatore))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, bryan) and Girdle(x, tallie) -> Perplexed(tallie))\nforall x (Smug(x) -> Galvanize(x, salvatore))\nforall x (Twitch(x, tallie) -> Galvanize(x, bryan))\nGalvanize(bryan, salvatore) and Twitch(bryan, tallie) -> Girdle(bryan, tallie)\nforall x (Creole(x) and Twitch(x, tallie) -> Undercover(tallie))\nforall x (Perplexed(x) -> Girdle(x, tallie))\n\nGirdle(salvatore, tallie)\n\nforall x (Perplexed(x) -> Girdle(x, tallie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The quinlan uncover the freddie. The quinlan uncover the basia. The quinlan fossilise the freddie. The quinlan is aegean. The quinlan is mordant. The quinlan swish the basia. The freddie uncover the basia. The freddie is aegean. The freddie is mordant. The freddie is respected. The freddie is abreast. The freddie swish the basia. The basia is liege. The basia swish the quinlan. The basia swish the freddie. If someone fossilise the freddie and the freddie is respected then the freddie swish the quinlan. If someone is respected then they chase the freddie. If someone fossilise the basia and they chase the quinlan then the quinlan is liege. If someone is respected then they eat the freddie. If someone swish the quinlan then they eat the basia. If the basia fossilise the freddie and the basia swish the quinlan then the basia uncover the quinlan. If someone is mordant and they visit the quinlan then the quinlan is abreast. If someone is liege then they chase the quinlan. The basia does not chase the freddie.", "logic": "\nUncover(quinlan, freddie)\nUncover(quinlan, basia)\nFossilise(quinlan, freddie)\nAegean(quinlan)\nMordant(quinlan)\nSwish(quinlan, basia)\nUncover(freddie, basia)\nAegean(freddie)\nMordant(freddie)\nRespected(freddie)\nAbreast(freddie)\nSwish(freddie, basia)\nLiege(basia)\nSwish(basia, quinlan)\nSwish(basia, freddie)\nforall x (Fossilise(x, freddie) and Respected(freddie) -> Swish(freddie, quinlan))\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Uncover(x, freddie))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, basia) and Uncover(x, quinlan) -> Liege(quinlan))\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Fossilise(x, freddie))\nforall x (Swish(x, quinlan) -> Fossilise(x, basia))\nFossilise(basia, freddie) and Swish(basia, quinlan) -> Uncover(basia, quinlan)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Swish(x, quinlan) -> Abreast(quinlan))\nforall x (Liege(x) -> Uncover(x, quinlan))\n\nnot Uncover(basia, freddie)\n\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Uncover(x, freddie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The zippy doom the esteban. The zippy doom the elmira. The zippy excrete the esteban. The zippy is peptic. The zippy is downward. The zippy skew the elmira. The esteban doom the elmira. The esteban is peptic. The esteban is downward. The esteban is immodest. The esteban is starless. The esteban skew the elmira. The elmira is stupefied. The elmira skew the zippy. The elmira skew the esteban. If someone excrete the esteban and the esteban is immodest then the esteban skew the zippy. If someone is immodest then they chase the esteban. If someone excrete the elmira and they chase the zippy then the zippy is stupefied. If someone is immodest then they eat the esteban. If someone skew the zippy then they eat the elmira. If the elmira excrete the esteban and the elmira skew the zippy then the elmira doom the zippy. If someone is downward and they visit the zippy then the zippy is starless. If someone is stupefied then they chase the zippy. The zippy excrete the elmira.", "logic": "\nDoom(zippy, esteban)\nDoom(zippy, elmira)\nExcrete(zippy, esteban)\nPeptic(zippy)\nDownward(zippy)\nSkew(zippy, elmira)\nDoom(esteban, elmira)\nPeptic(esteban)\nDownward(esteban)\nImmodest(esteban)\nStarless(esteban)\nSkew(esteban, elmira)\nStupefied(elmira)\nSkew(elmira, zippy)\nSkew(elmira, esteban)\nforall x (Excrete(x, esteban) and Immodest(esteban) -> Skew(esteban, zippy))\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Doom(x, esteban))\nforall x (Excrete(x, elmira) and Doom(x, zippy) -> Stupefied(zippy))\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Excrete(x, esteban))\nforall x (Skew(x, zippy) -> Excrete(x, elmira))\nExcrete(elmira, esteban) and Skew(elmira, zippy) -> Doom(elmira, zippy)\nforall x (Downward(x) and Skew(x, zippy) -> Starless(zippy))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Doom(x, zippy))\n\nExcrete(zippy, elmira)\n\nforall x (Skew(x, zippy) -> Excrete(x, elmira)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The amos hoodwink the torre. The amos hoodwink the amity. The amos underprice the torre. The amos is kindred. The amos is porcine. The amos tether the amity. The torre hoodwink the amity. The torre is kindred. The torre is porcine. The torre is opposed. The torre is various. The torre tether the amity. The amity is edited. The amity tether the amos. The amity tether the torre. If someone underprice the torre and the torre is opposed then the torre tether the amos. If someone is opposed then they chase the torre. If someone underprice the amity and they chase the amos then the amos is edited. If someone is opposed then they eat the torre. If someone tether the amos then they eat the amity. If the amity underprice the torre and the amity tether the amos then the amity hoodwink the amos. If someone is porcine and they visit the amos then the amos is various. If someone is edited then they chase the amos. The amity is not opposed.", "logic": "\nHoodwink(amos, torre)\nHoodwink(amos, amity)\nUnderprice(amos, torre)\nKindred(amos)\nPorcine(amos)\nTether(amos, amity)\nHoodwink(torre, amity)\nKindred(torre)\nPorcine(torre)\nOpposed(torre)\nVarious(torre)\nTether(torre, amity)\nEdited(amity)\nTether(amity, amos)\nTether(amity, torre)\nforall x (Underprice(x, torre) and Opposed(torre) -> Tether(torre, amos))\nforall x (Opposed(x) -> Hoodwink(x, torre))\nforall x (Underprice(x, amity) and Hoodwink(x, amos) -> Edited(amos))\nforall x (Opposed(x) -> Underprice(x, torre))\nforall x (Tether(x, amos) -> Underprice(x, amity))\nUnderprice(amity, torre) and Tether(amity, amos) -> Hoodwink(amity, amos)\nforall x (Porcine(x) and Tether(x, amos) -> Various(amos))\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Hoodwink(x, amos))\n\nnot Opposed(amity)\n\nnot Opposed(amity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The aurelia fraction the cam. The aurelia fraction the kanya. The aurelia hammer the cam. The aurelia is limacoid. The aurelia is contrary. The aurelia slag the kanya. The cam fraction the kanya. The cam is limacoid. The cam is contrary. The cam is amnionic. The cam is dopey. The cam slag the kanya. The kanya is necessary. The kanya slag the aurelia. The kanya slag the cam. If someone hammer the cam and the cam is amnionic then the cam slag the aurelia. If someone is amnionic then they chase the cam. If someone hammer the kanya and they chase the aurelia then the aurelia is necessary. If someone is amnionic then they eat the cam. If someone slag the aurelia then they eat the kanya. If the kanya hammer the cam and the kanya slag the aurelia then the kanya fraction the aurelia. If someone is contrary and they visit the aurelia then the aurelia is dopey. If someone is necessary then they chase the aurelia. The kanya slag the kanya.", "logic": "\nFraction(aurelia, cam)\nFraction(aurelia, kanya)\nHammer(aurelia, cam)\nLimacoid(aurelia)\nContrary(aurelia)\nSlag(aurelia, kanya)\nFraction(cam, kanya)\nLimacoid(cam)\nContrary(cam)\nAmnionic(cam)\nDopey(cam)\nSlag(cam, kanya)\nNecessary(kanya)\nSlag(kanya, aurelia)\nSlag(kanya, cam)\nforall x (Hammer(x, cam) and Amnionic(cam) -> Slag(cam, aurelia))\nforall x (Amnionic(x) -> Fraction(x, cam))\nforall x (Hammer(x, kanya) and Fraction(x, aurelia) -> Necessary(aurelia))\nforall x (Amnionic(x) -> Hammer(x, cam))\nforall x (Slag(x, aurelia) -> Hammer(x, kanya))\nHammer(kanya, cam) and Slag(kanya, aurelia) -> Fraction(kanya, aurelia)\nforall x (Contrary(x) and Slag(x, aurelia) -> Dopey(aurelia))\nforall x (Necessary(x) -> Fraction(x, aurelia))\n\nSlag(kanya, kanya)\n\nSlag(kanya, kanya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The fran recombine the sam. The fran recombine the elliot. The fran dizen the sam. The fran is legato. The fran is putrid. The fran interview the elliot. The sam recombine the elliot. The sam is legato. The sam is putrid. The sam is laboring. The sam is unclad. The sam interview the elliot. The elliot is spurious. The elliot interview the fran. The elliot interview the sam. If someone dizen the sam and the sam is laboring then the sam interview the fran. If someone is laboring then they chase the sam. If someone dizen the elliot and they chase the fran then the fran is spurious. If someone is laboring then they eat the sam. If someone interview the fran then they eat the elliot. If the elliot dizen the sam and the elliot interview the fran then the elliot recombine the fran. If someone is putrid and they visit the fran then the fran is unclad. If someone is spurious then they chase the fran. The sam is not spurious.", "logic": "\nRecombine(fran, sam)\nRecombine(fran, elliot)\nDizen(fran, sam)\nLegato(fran)\nPutrid(fran)\nInterview(fran, elliot)\nRecombine(sam, elliot)\nLegato(sam)\nPutrid(sam)\nLaboring(sam)\nUnclad(sam)\nInterview(sam, elliot)\nSpurious(elliot)\nInterview(elliot, fran)\nInterview(elliot, sam)\nforall x (Dizen(x, sam) and Laboring(sam) -> Interview(sam, fran))\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Recombine(x, sam))\nforall x (Dizen(x, elliot) and Recombine(x, fran) -> Spurious(fran))\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Dizen(x, sam))\nforall x (Interview(x, fran) -> Dizen(x, elliot))\nDizen(elliot, sam) and Interview(elliot, fran) -> Recombine(elliot, fran)\nforall x (Putrid(x) and Interview(x, fran) -> Unclad(fran))\nforall x (Spurious(x) -> Recombine(x, fran))\n\nnot Spurious(sam)\n\nnot Spurious(sam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The aldo scoot the celie. The aldo scoot the tamar. The aldo economize the celie. The aldo is unsporting. The aldo is fleshly. The aldo sift the tamar. The celie scoot the tamar. The celie is unsporting. The celie is fleshly. The celie is spick. The celie is protruding. The celie sift the tamar. The tamar is chaste. The tamar sift the aldo. The tamar sift the celie. If someone economize the celie and the celie is spick then the celie sift the aldo. If someone is spick then they chase the celie. If someone economize the tamar and they chase the aldo then the aldo is chaste. If someone is spick then they eat the celie. If someone sift the aldo then they eat the tamar. If the tamar economize the celie and the tamar sift the aldo then the tamar scoot the aldo. If someone is fleshly and they visit the aldo then the aldo is protruding. If someone is chaste then they chase the aldo. The celie economize the aldo.", "logic": "\nScoot(aldo, celie)\nScoot(aldo, tamar)\nEconomize(aldo, celie)\nUnsporting(aldo)\nFleshly(aldo)\nSift(aldo, tamar)\nScoot(celie, tamar)\nUnsporting(celie)\nFleshly(celie)\nSpick(celie)\nProtruding(celie)\nSift(celie, tamar)\nChaste(tamar)\nSift(tamar, aldo)\nSift(tamar, celie)\nforall x (Economize(x, celie) and Spick(celie) -> Sift(celie, aldo))\nforall x (Spick(x) -> Scoot(x, celie))\nforall x (Economize(x, tamar) and Scoot(x, aldo) -> Chaste(aldo))\nforall x (Spick(x) -> Economize(x, celie))\nforall x (Sift(x, aldo) -> Economize(x, tamar))\nEconomize(tamar, celie) and Sift(tamar, aldo) -> Scoot(tamar, aldo)\nforall x (Fleshly(x) and Sift(x, aldo) -> Protruding(aldo))\nforall x (Chaste(x) -> Scoot(x, aldo))\n\nEconomize(celie, aldo)\n\nEconomize(celie, aldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Tracy is validating. Wrennie is undigested. Filip is acidic. Antony is validating. All undigested, acidic people are trembling. All acidic people are undigested. All validating people are acidic. Antony is validating.", "logic": "\nValidating(tracy)\nUndigested(wrennie)\nAcidic(filip)\nValidating(antony)\nforall x (Undigested(x) and Acidic(x) -> Trembling(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Acidic(x))\n\nValidating(antony)\n\ntherefore Validating(antony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Elie is unlimited. Fredra is brisk. Joey is panoptic. Antonius is unlimited. All brisk, panoptic people are brunette. All panoptic people are brisk. All unlimited people are panoptic. Elie is not unlimited.", "logic": "\nUnlimited(elie)\nBrisk(fredra)\nPanoptic(joey)\nUnlimited(antonius)\nforall x (Brisk(x) and Panoptic(x) -> Brunette(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Brisk(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) -> Panoptic(x))\n\nnot Unlimited(elie)\n\ntherefore Unlimited(elie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Edmund is xxviii. Morgan is raring. Gusty is eerie. Vera is xxviii. All raring, eerie people are detractive. All eerie people are raring. All xxviii people are eerie. Gusty is raring.", "logic": "\nXxviii(edmund)\nRaring(morgan)\nEerie(gusty)\nXxviii(vera)\nforall x (Raring(x) and Eerie(x) -> Detractive(x))\nforall x (Eerie(x) -> Raring(x))\nforall x (Xxviii(x) -> Eerie(x))\n\nRaring(gusty)\n\nEerie(gusty) and forall x (Eerie(x) -> Raring(x)) -> therefore Raring(gusty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Jorie is undesiring. Bellina is panicked. Beilul is unclothed. Garv is undesiring. All panicked, unclothed people are rigid. All unclothed people are panicked. All undesiring people are unclothed. Beilul is not panicked.", "logic": "\nUndesiring(jorie)\nPanicked(bellina)\nUnclothed(beilul)\nUndesiring(garv)\nforall x (Panicked(x) and Unclothed(x) -> Rigid(x))\nforall x (Unclothed(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Undesiring(x) -> Unclothed(x))\n\nnot Panicked(beilul)\n\nUnclothed(beilul) and forall x (Unclothed(x) -> Panicked(x)) -> therefore Panicked(beilul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Quintus is expectable. Rustin is baking. Leta is woodsy. Zsazsa is expectable. All baking, woodsy people are upbeat. All woodsy people are baking. All expectable people are woodsy. Quintus is baking.", "logic": "\nExpectable(quintus)\nBaking(rustin)\nWoodsy(leta)\nExpectable(zsazsa)\nforall x (Baking(x) and Woodsy(x) -> Upbeat(x))\nforall x (Woodsy(x) -> Baking(x))\nforall x (Expectable(x) -> Woodsy(x))\n\nBaking(quintus)\n\nExpectable(quintus) and forall x (Expectable(x) -> Woodsy(x)) -> therefore Woodsy(quintus) Woodsy(quintus) and forall x (Woodsy(x) -> Baking(x)) -> therefore Baking(quintus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Laureen is cheerless. Silvain is carnal. Demetris is buddhistic. Cleland is cheerless. All carnal, buddhistic people are substitute. All buddhistic people are carnal. All cheerless people are buddhistic. Cleland is not carnal.", "logic": "\nCheerless(laureen)\nCarnal(silvain)\nBuddhistic(demetris)\nCheerless(cleland)\nforall x (Carnal(x) and Buddhistic(x) -> Substitute(x))\nforall x (Buddhistic(x) -> Carnal(x))\nforall x (Cheerless(x) -> Buddhistic(x))\n\nnot Carnal(cleland)\n\nCheerless(cleland) and forall x (Cheerless(x) -> Buddhistic(x)) -> therefore Buddhistic(cleland) Buddhistic(cleland) and forall x (Buddhistic(x) -> Carnal(x)) -> therefore Carnal(cleland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Margarete is nonstick. Shanna is zolaesque. Derron is brattish. Lian is nonstick. All zolaesque, brattish people are grayish. All brattish people are zolaesque. All nonstick people are brattish. Margarete is grayish.", "logic": "\nNonstick(margarete)\nZolaesque(shanna)\nBrattish(derron)\nNonstick(lian)\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) and Brattish(x) -> Grayish(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> Zolaesque(x))\nforall x (Nonstick(x) -> Brattish(x))\n\nGrayish(margarete)\n\nNonstick(margarete) and forall x (Nonstick(x) -> Brattish(x)) -> therefore Brattish(margarete) Brattish(margarete) and forall x (Brattish(x) -> Zolaesque(x)) -> therefore Zolaesque(margarete) Nonstick(margarete) and forall x (Nonstick(x) -> Brattish(x)) -> therefore Brattish(margarete) Zolaesque(margarete) and Brattish(margarete) and forall x (Zolaesque(x) and Brattish(x) -> Grayish(x)) -> therefore Grayish(margarete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Gere is flawless. Clinten is coagulated. Rolph is basic. Roselyn is flawless. All coagulated, basic people are schmaltzy. All basic people are coagulated. All flawless people are basic. Gere is not schmaltzy.", "logic": "\nFlawless(gere)\nCoagulated(clinten)\nBasic(rolph)\nFlawless(roselyn)\nforall x (Coagulated(x) and Basic(x) -> Schmaltzy(x))\nforall x (Basic(x) -> Coagulated(x))\nforall x (Flawless(x) -> Basic(x))\n\nnot Schmaltzy(gere)\n\nFlawless(gere) and forall x (Flawless(x) -> Basic(x)) -> therefore Basic(gere) Basic(gere) and forall x (Basic(x) -> Coagulated(x)) -> therefore Coagulated(gere) Flawless(gere) and forall x (Flawless(x) -> Basic(x)) -> therefore Basic(gere) Coagulated(gere) and Basic(gere) and forall x (Coagulated(x) and Basic(x) -> Schmaltzy(x)) -> therefore Schmaltzy(gere)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Doria is ameban. Kylie is inevitable. Egbert is troublous. Ruthi is ameban. All inevitable, troublous people are offside. All troublous people are inevitable. All ameban people are troublous. Kylie is not troublous.", "logic": "\nAmeban(doria)\nInevitable(kylie)\nTroublous(egbert)\nAmeban(ruthi)\nforall x (Inevitable(x) and Troublous(x) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> Inevitable(x))\nforall x (Ameban(x) -> Troublous(x))\n\nnot Troublous(kylie)\n\nforall x (Ameban(x) -> Troublous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Sadella is transfixed. Jamima is botswanan. Myron is pale. Wilmar is transfixed. All botswanan, pale people are petrifying. All pale people are botswanan. All transfixed people are pale. Jamima is petrifying.", "logic": "\nTransfixed(sadella)\nBotswanan(jamima)\nPale(myron)\nTransfixed(wilmar)\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Pale(x) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) -> Botswanan(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> Pale(x))\n\nPetrifying(jamima)\n\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Pale(x) -> Petrifying(x)) <- forall x (Transfixed(x) -> Pale(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Maiga is feculent. Mela is cuspate. Stig is unworkable. Hassan is feculent. All cuspate, unworkable people are addicted. All unworkable people are cuspate. All feculent people are unworkable. Stig is not rough.", "logic": "\nFeculent(maiga)\nCuspate(mela)\nUnworkable(stig)\nFeculent(hassan)\nforall x (Cuspate(x) and Unworkable(x) -> Addicted(x))\nforall x (Unworkable(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Feculent(x) -> Unworkable(x))\n\nnot Rough(stig)\n\nnot Rough(stig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Secunda is preserved. Nanette is dimorphic. Hatti is disastrous. Rey is preserved. All dimorphic, disastrous people are submersed. All disastrous people are dimorphic. All preserved people are disastrous. Hatti is big.", "logic": "\nPreserved(secunda)\nDimorphic(nanette)\nDisastrous(hatti)\nPreserved(rey)\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and Disastrous(x) -> Submersed(x))\nforall x (Disastrous(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Disastrous(x))\n\nBig(hatti)\n\nBig(hatti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Demetre is chichi. Morton is umptieth. Standford is evenhanded. Fitz is chichi. All umptieth, evenhanded people are preanal. All evenhanded people are umptieth. All chichi people are evenhanded. Fitz is not quiet.", "logic": "\nChichi(demetre)\nUmptieth(morton)\nEvenhanded(standford)\nChichi(fitz)\nforall x (Umptieth(x) and Evenhanded(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Evenhanded(x) -> Umptieth(x))\nforall x (Chichi(x) -> Evenhanded(x))\n\nnot Quiet(fitz)\n\nnot Quiet(fitz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Franklyn is undersized. Dorotea is ametropic. Lazaro is intestinal. Corrinne is undersized. All ametropic, intestinal people are profaned. All intestinal people are ametropic. All undersized people are intestinal. Corrinne is big.", "logic": "\nUndersized(franklyn)\nAmetropic(dorotea)\nIntestinal(lazaro)\nUndersized(corrinne)\nforall x (Ametropic(x) and Intestinal(x) -> Profaned(x))\nforall x (Intestinal(x) -> Ametropic(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Intestinal(x))\n\nBig(corrinne)\n\nBig(corrinne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Clea is floored. Carson is optimistic. Kala is shortish. Zebulon is floored. All optimistic, shortish people are primal. All shortish people are optimistic. All floored people are shortish. Carson is not rough.", "logic": "\nFloored(clea)\nOptimistic(carson)\nShortish(kala)\nFloored(zebulon)\nforall x (Optimistic(x) and Shortish(x) -> Primal(x))\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Optimistic(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) -> Shortish(x))\n\nnot Rough(carson)\n\nnot Rough(carson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Luana is rattled. Brina is lissom. Bambie is ritenuto. Andy is rattled. All lissom, ritenuto people are mensural. All ritenuto people are lissom. All rattled people are ritenuto. Andy is rough.", "logic": "\nRattled(luana)\nLissom(brina)\nRitenuto(bambie)\nRattled(andy)\nforall x (Lissom(x) and Ritenuto(x) -> Mensural(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) -> Lissom(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\n\nRough(andy)\n\nRough(andy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Cherry is skanky. Cherry is cragged. Cherry is orderly. Cherry is loamless. Reta is dour. Reta is cragged. Reta is orderly. Reta is loamless. Tobe is diaphanous. Tobe is dour. Tobe is skanky. Tobe is cragged. Tobe is orderly. Tobe is loamless. Tobe is curling. Quiet things are curling. If something is curling and cragged then it is orderly. All dour, diaphanous things are skanky. If something is diaphanous and skanky then it is orderly. Round things are diaphanous. If Tobe is cragged then Tobe is orderly. Tobe is orderly.", "logic": "\nSkanky(cherry)\nCragged(cherry)\nOrderly(cherry)\nLoamless(cherry)\nDour(reta)\nCragged(reta)\nOrderly(reta)\nLoamless(reta)\nDiaphanous(tobe)\nDour(tobe)\nSkanky(tobe)\nCragged(tobe)\nOrderly(tobe)\nLoamless(tobe)\nCurling(tobe)\nforall x (Skanky(x) -> Curling(x))\nforall x (Curling(x) and Cragged(x) -> Orderly(x))\nforall x (Dour(x) and Diaphanous(x) -> Skanky(x))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) and Skanky(x) -> Orderly(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Diaphanous(x))\nCragged(tobe) -> Orderly(tobe)\n\nOrderly(tobe)\n\ntherefore Orderly(tobe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Averil is unmade. Averil is jugular. Averil is aged. Averil is outclassed. Odie is aflame. Odie is jugular. Odie is aged. Odie is outclassed. Hannibal is through. Hannibal is aflame. Hannibal is unmade. Hannibal is jugular. Hannibal is aged. Hannibal is outclassed. Hannibal is abscessed. Quiet things are abscessed. If something is abscessed and jugular then it is aged. All aflame, through things are unmade. If something is through and unmade then it is aged. Round things are through. If Hannibal is jugular then Hannibal is aged. Averil is not unmade.", "logic": "\nUnmade(averil)\nJugular(averil)\nAged(averil)\nOutclassed(averil)\nAflame(odie)\nJugular(odie)\nAged(odie)\nOutclassed(odie)\nThrough(hannibal)\nAflame(hannibal)\nUnmade(hannibal)\nJugular(hannibal)\nAged(hannibal)\nOutclassed(hannibal)\nAbscessed(hannibal)\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Abscessed(x) and Jugular(x) -> Aged(x))\nforall x (Aflame(x) and Through(x) -> Unmade(x))\nforall x (Through(x) and Unmade(x) -> Aged(x))\nforall x (Aged(x) -> Through(x))\nJugular(hannibal) -> Aged(hannibal)\n\nnot Unmade(averil)\n\ntherefore Unmade(averil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Shirline is calcific. Shirline is pillaged. Shirline is nonmotile. Shirline is whacky. Merl is byzantine. Merl is pillaged. Merl is nonmotile. Merl is whacky. Gustaf is moderato. Gustaf is byzantine. Gustaf is calcific. Gustaf is pillaged. Gustaf is nonmotile. Gustaf is whacky. Gustaf is unspecific. Quiet things are unspecific. If something is unspecific and pillaged then it is nonmotile. All byzantine, moderato things are calcific. If something is moderato and calcific then it is nonmotile. Round things are moderato. If Gustaf is pillaged then Gustaf is nonmotile. Shirline is moderato.", "logic": "\nCalcific(shirline)\nPillaged(shirline)\nNonmotile(shirline)\nWhacky(shirline)\nByzantine(merl)\nPillaged(merl)\nNonmotile(merl)\nWhacky(merl)\nModerato(gustaf)\nByzantine(gustaf)\nCalcific(gustaf)\nPillaged(gustaf)\nNonmotile(gustaf)\nWhacky(gustaf)\nUnspecific(gustaf)\nforall x (Calcific(x) -> Unspecific(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) and Pillaged(x) -> Nonmotile(x))\nforall x (Byzantine(x) and Moderato(x) -> Calcific(x))\nforall x (Moderato(x) and Calcific(x) -> Nonmotile(x))\nforall x (Nonmotile(x) -> Moderato(x))\nPillaged(gustaf) -> Nonmotile(gustaf)\n\nModerato(shirline)\n\nNonmotile(shirline) and forall x (Nonmotile(x) -> Moderato(x)) -> therefore Moderato(shirline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Betta is banned. Betta is concordant. Betta is prodromal. Betta is unsparing. Manish is copulative. Manish is concordant. Manish is prodromal. Manish is unsparing. Demetre is bigeneric. Demetre is copulative. Demetre is banned. Demetre is concordant. Demetre is prodromal. Demetre is unsparing. Demetre is amenable. Quiet things are amenable. If something is amenable and concordant then it is prodromal. All copulative, bigeneric things are banned. If something is bigeneric and banned then it is prodromal. Round things are bigeneric. If Demetre is concordant then Demetre is prodromal. Betta is not amenable.", "logic": "\nBanned(betta)\nConcordant(betta)\nProdromal(betta)\nUnsparing(betta)\nCopulative(manish)\nConcordant(manish)\nProdromal(manish)\nUnsparing(manish)\nBigeneric(demetre)\nCopulative(demetre)\nBanned(demetre)\nConcordant(demetre)\nProdromal(demetre)\nUnsparing(demetre)\nAmenable(demetre)\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) and Concordant(x) -> Prodromal(x))\nforall x (Copulative(x) and Bigeneric(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Banned(x) -> Prodromal(x))\nforall x (Prodromal(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nConcordant(demetre) -> Prodromal(demetre)\n\nnot Amenable(betta)\n\nBanned(betta) and forall x (Banned(x) -> Amenable(x)) -> therefore Amenable(betta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Ignatius is unitarian. Ignatius is climatic. Ignatius is mixable. Ignatius is moonlike. Daloris is sclerosed. Daloris is climatic. Daloris is mixable. Daloris is moonlike. Deidre is crossed. Deidre is sclerosed. Deidre is unitarian. Deidre is climatic. Deidre is mixable. Deidre is moonlike. Deidre is xxxii. Quiet things are xxxii. If something is xxxii and climatic then it is mixable. All sclerosed, crossed things are unitarian. If something is crossed and unitarian then it is mixable. Round things are crossed. If Deidre is climatic then Deidre is mixable. Daloris is unitarian.", "logic": "\nUnitarian(ignatius)\nClimatic(ignatius)\nMixable(ignatius)\nMoonlike(ignatius)\nSclerosed(daloris)\nClimatic(daloris)\nMixable(daloris)\nMoonlike(daloris)\nCrossed(deidre)\nSclerosed(deidre)\nUnitarian(deidre)\nClimatic(deidre)\nMixable(deidre)\nMoonlike(deidre)\nXxxii(deidre)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Xxxii(x))\nforall x (Xxxii(x) and Climatic(x) -> Mixable(x))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) and Crossed(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Crossed(x) and Unitarian(x) -> Mixable(x))\nforall x (Mixable(x) -> Crossed(x))\nClimatic(deidre) -> Mixable(deidre)\n\nUnitarian(daloris)\n\nMixable(daloris) and forall x (Mixable(x) -> Crossed(x)) -> therefore Crossed(daloris) Sclerosed(daloris) and Crossed(daloris) and forall x (Sclerosed(x) and Crossed(x) -> Unitarian(x)) -> therefore Unitarian(daloris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Frankie is exiguous. Frankie is prime. Frankie is unlobed. Frankie is ectopic. Sherry is mongoloid. Sherry is prime. Sherry is unlobed. Sherry is ectopic. Roanna is hospitable. Roanna is mongoloid. Roanna is exiguous. Roanna is prime. Roanna is unlobed. Roanna is ectopic. Roanna is loveless. Quiet things are loveless. If something is loveless and prime then it is unlobed. All mongoloid, hospitable things are exiguous. If something is hospitable and exiguous then it is unlobed. Round things are hospitable. If Roanna is prime then Roanna is unlobed. Sherry is not exiguous.", "logic": "\nExiguous(frankie)\nPrime(frankie)\nUnlobed(frankie)\nEctopic(frankie)\nMongoloid(sherry)\nPrime(sherry)\nUnlobed(sherry)\nEctopic(sherry)\nHospitable(roanna)\nMongoloid(roanna)\nExiguous(roanna)\nPrime(roanna)\nUnlobed(roanna)\nEctopic(roanna)\nLoveless(roanna)\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Loveless(x))\nforall x (Loveless(x) and Prime(x) -> Unlobed(x))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) and Hospitable(x) -> Exiguous(x))\nforall x (Hospitable(x) and Exiguous(x) -> Unlobed(x))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) -> Hospitable(x))\nPrime(roanna) -> Unlobed(roanna)\n\nnot Exiguous(sherry)\n\nUnlobed(sherry) and forall x (Unlobed(x) -> Hospitable(x)) -> therefore Hospitable(sherry) Mongoloid(sherry) and Hospitable(sherry) and forall x (Mongoloid(x) and Hospitable(x) -> Exiguous(x)) -> therefore Exiguous(sherry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Quintina is exploded. Quintina is tattered. Quintina is bipolar. Quintina is renowned. Codi is paralytic. Codi is tattered. Codi is bipolar. Codi is renowned. Arda is rumanian. Arda is paralytic. Arda is exploded. Arda is tattered. Arda is bipolar. Arda is renowned. Arda is montane. Quiet things are montane. If something is montane and tattered then it is bipolar. All paralytic, rumanian things are exploded. If something is rumanian and exploded then it is bipolar. Round things are rumanian. If Arda is tattered then Arda is bipolar. Codi is montane.", "logic": "\nExploded(quintina)\nTattered(quintina)\nBipolar(quintina)\nRenowned(quintina)\nParalytic(codi)\nTattered(codi)\nBipolar(codi)\nRenowned(codi)\nRumanian(arda)\nParalytic(arda)\nExploded(arda)\nTattered(arda)\nBipolar(arda)\nRenowned(arda)\nMontane(arda)\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Montane(x))\nforall x (Montane(x) and Tattered(x) -> Bipolar(x))\nforall x (Paralytic(x) and Rumanian(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) and Exploded(x) -> Bipolar(x))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) -> Rumanian(x))\nTattered(arda) -> Bipolar(arda)\n\nMontane(codi)\n\nBipolar(codi) and forall x (Bipolar(x) -> Rumanian(x)) -> therefore Rumanian(codi) Paralytic(codi) and Rumanian(codi) and forall x (Paralytic(x) and Rumanian(x) -> Exploded(x)) -> therefore Exploded(codi) Exploded(codi) and forall x (Exploded(x) -> Montane(x)) -> therefore Montane(codi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Kyle is elect. Kyle is latish. Kyle is missing. Kyle is destitute. Kayley is rangy. Kayley is latish. Kayley is missing. Kayley is destitute. Dodie is unfair. Dodie is rangy. Dodie is elect. Dodie is latish. Dodie is missing. Dodie is destitute. Dodie is deistic. Quiet things are deistic. If something is deistic and latish then it is missing. All rangy, unfair things are elect. If something is unfair and elect then it is missing. Round things are unfair. If Dodie is latish then Dodie is missing. Kayley is not deistic.", "logic": "\nElect(kyle)\nLatish(kyle)\nMissing(kyle)\nDestitute(kyle)\nRangy(kayley)\nLatish(kayley)\nMissing(kayley)\nDestitute(kayley)\nUnfair(dodie)\nRangy(dodie)\nElect(dodie)\nLatish(dodie)\nMissing(dodie)\nDestitute(dodie)\nDeistic(dodie)\nforall x (Elect(x) -> Deistic(x))\nforall x (Deistic(x) and Latish(x) -> Missing(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) and Unfair(x) -> Elect(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Elect(x) -> Missing(x))\nforall x (Missing(x) -> Unfair(x))\nLatish(dodie) -> Missing(dodie)\n\nnot Deistic(kayley)\n\nMissing(kayley) and forall x (Missing(x) -> Unfair(x)) -> therefore Unfair(kayley) Rangy(kayley) and Unfair(kayley) and forall x (Rangy(x) and Unfair(x) -> Elect(x)) -> therefore Elect(kayley) Elect(kayley) and forall x (Elect(x) -> Deistic(x)) -> therefore Deistic(kayley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Violante is despiteful. Nicoline is adducting. Alexandra is adducting. All apart people are despiteful. All adducting, despiteful people are localised. If someone is adducting then they are apart. Smart, adducting people are apart. All ruminative people are apart. Smart, localised people are ionian. Nicoline is adducting.", "logic": "\nDespiteful(violante)\nAdducting(nicoline)\nAdducting(alexandra)\nforall x (Apart(x) -> Despiteful(x))\nforall x (Adducting(x) and Despiteful(x) -> Localised(x))\nforall x (Adducting(x) -> Apart(x))\nforall x (Despiteful(x) and Adducting(x) -> Apart(x))\nforall x (Ruminative(x) -> Apart(x))\nforall x (Despiteful(x) and Localised(x) -> Ionian(x))\n\nAdducting(nicoline)\n\ntherefore Adducting(nicoline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Vaughan is depleted. Calli is precarious. Roddy is precarious. All autoerotic people are depleted. All precarious, depleted people are caulescent. If someone is precarious then they are autoerotic. Smart, precarious people are autoerotic. All delusive people are autoerotic. Smart, caulescent people are comic. Vaughan is not depleted.", "logic": "\nDepleted(vaughan)\nPrecarious(calli)\nPrecarious(roddy)\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Precarious(x) and Depleted(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Precarious(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Depleted(x) and Precarious(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Delusive(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Depleted(x) and Caulescent(x) -> Comic(x))\n\nnot Depleted(vaughan)\n\ntherefore Depleted(vaughan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Wiatt is upcoming. Darrin is adapted. Rodrique is adapted. All isosceles people are upcoming. All adapted, upcoming people are submissive. If someone is adapted then they are isosceles. Smart, adapted people are isosceles. All unfair people are isosceles. Smart, submissive people are supporting. Rodrique is isosceles.", "logic": "\nUpcoming(wiatt)\nAdapted(darrin)\nAdapted(rodrique)\nforall x (Isosceles(x) -> Upcoming(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) and Upcoming(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) -> Isosceles(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Adapted(x) -> Isosceles(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) -> Isosceles(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Submissive(x) -> Supporting(x))\n\nIsosceles(rodrique)\n\nAdapted(rodrique) and forall x (Adapted(x) -> Isosceles(x)) -> therefore Isosceles(rodrique)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Deirdre is jovian. Gisele is greedy. Woodman is greedy. All sagging people are jovian. All greedy, jovian people are unnameable. If someone is greedy then they are sagging. Smart, greedy people are sagging. All gloomful people are sagging. Smart, unnameable people are bisontine. Gisele is not sagging.", "logic": "\nJovian(deirdre)\nGreedy(gisele)\nGreedy(woodman)\nforall x (Sagging(x) -> Jovian(x))\nforall x (Greedy(x) and Jovian(x) -> Unnameable(x))\nforall x (Greedy(x) -> Sagging(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) and Greedy(x) -> Sagging(x))\nforall x (Gloomful(x) -> Sagging(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) and Unnameable(x) -> Bisontine(x))\n\nnot Sagging(gisele)\n\nGreedy(gisele) and forall x (Greedy(x) -> Sagging(x)) -> therefore Sagging(gisele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Arturo is flameproof. Fred is cumulative. Lowell is cumulative. All crustacean people are flameproof. All cumulative, flameproof people are quixotic. If someone is cumulative then they are crustacean. Smart, cumulative people are crustacean. All sarawakian people are crustacean. Smart, quixotic people are beamy. Lowell is flameproof.", "logic": "\nFlameproof(arturo)\nCumulative(fred)\nCumulative(lowell)\nforall x (Crustacean(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) and Flameproof(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Cumulative(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Quixotic(x) -> Beamy(x))\n\nFlameproof(lowell)\n\nCumulative(lowell) and forall x (Cumulative(x) -> Crustacean(x)) -> therefore Crustacean(lowell) Crustacean(lowell) and forall x (Crustacean(x) -> Flameproof(x)) -> therefore Flameproof(lowell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Sanford is postmortal. Morly is razorback. Welch is razorback. All unservile people are postmortal. All razorback, postmortal people are arresting. If someone is razorback then they are unservile. Smart, razorback people are unservile. All habitable people are unservile. Smart, arresting people are alveolar. Welch is not postmortal.", "logic": "\nPostmortal(sanford)\nRazorback(morly)\nRazorback(welch)\nforall x (Unservile(x) -> Postmortal(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) and Postmortal(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) -> Unservile(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Razorback(x) -> Unservile(x))\nforall x (Habitable(x) -> Unservile(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Arresting(x) -> Alveolar(x))\n\nnot Postmortal(welch)\n\nRazorback(welch) and forall x (Razorback(x) -> Unservile(x)) -> therefore Unservile(welch) Unservile(welch) and forall x (Unservile(x) -> Postmortal(x)) -> therefore Postmortal(welch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Sampson is foul. Ofilia is bounden. Hasheem is bounden. All ringleted people are foul. All bounden, foul people are emblematic. If someone is bounden then they are ringleted. Smart, bounden people are ringleted. All paleozoic people are ringleted. Smart, emblematic people are marian. Hasheem is emblematic.", "logic": "\nFoul(sampson)\nBounden(ofilia)\nBounden(hasheem)\nforall x (Ringleted(x) -> Foul(x))\nforall x (Bounden(x) and Foul(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Bounden(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Foul(x) and Bounden(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Foul(x) and Emblematic(x) -> Marian(x))\n\nEmblematic(hasheem)\n\nBounden(hasheem) and forall x (Bounden(x) -> Ringleted(x)) -> therefore Ringleted(hasheem) Ringleted(hasheem) and forall x (Ringleted(x) -> Foul(x)) -> therefore Foul(hasheem) Bounden(hasheem) and Foul(hasheem) and forall x (Bounden(x) and Foul(x) -> Emblematic(x)) -> therefore Emblematic(hasheem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Lyndel is lurid. Sabra is confiding. Logan is confiding. All clad people are lurid. All confiding, lurid people are scrabbly. If someone is confiding then they are clad. Smart, confiding people are clad. All xxiii people are clad. Smart, scrabbly people are blasting. Sabra is not scrabbly.", "logic": "\nLurid(lyndel)\nConfiding(sabra)\nConfiding(logan)\nforall x (Clad(x) -> Lurid(x))\nforall x (Confiding(x) and Lurid(x) -> Scrabbly(x))\nforall x (Confiding(x) -> Clad(x))\nforall x (Lurid(x) and Confiding(x) -> Clad(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) -> Clad(x))\nforall x (Lurid(x) and Scrabbly(x) -> Blasting(x))\n\nnot Scrabbly(sabra)\n\nConfiding(sabra) and forall x (Confiding(x) -> Clad(x)) -> therefore Clad(sabra) Clad(sabra) and forall x (Clad(x) -> Lurid(x)) -> therefore Lurid(sabra) Confiding(sabra) and Lurid(sabra) and forall x (Confiding(x) and Lurid(x) -> Scrabbly(x)) -> therefore Scrabbly(sabra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Hilton is deictic. Madlen is mycenaean. Mercie is mycenaean. All metaphoric people are deictic. All mycenaean, deictic people are rimose. If someone is mycenaean then they are metaphoric. Smart, mycenaean people are metaphoric. All madagascan people are metaphoric. Smart, rimose people are allied. Hilton is not allied.", "logic": "\nDeictic(hilton)\nMycenaean(madlen)\nMycenaean(mercie)\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Deictic(x) -> Rimose(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\nforall x (Deictic(x) and Mycenaean(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\nforall x (Madagascan(x) -> Metaphoric(x))\nforall x (Deictic(x) and Rimose(x) -> Allied(x))\n\nnot Allied(hilton)\n\nforall x (Deictic(x) and Rimose(x) -> Allied(x)) <- forall x (Mycenaean(x) and Deictic(x) -> Rimose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Samuela is ceruminous. Mason is nonaged. Ronny is nonaged. All presto people are ceruminous. All nonaged, ceruminous people are gingery. If someone is nonaged then they are presto. Smart, nonaged people are presto. All magical people are presto. Smart, gingery people are poor. Samuela is presto.", "logic": "\nCeruminous(samuela)\nNonaged(mason)\nNonaged(ronny)\nforall x (Presto(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) and Ceruminous(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) and Nonaged(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Magical(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) and Gingery(x) -> Poor(x))\n\nPresto(samuela)\n\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> Presto(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Marillin is colourless. Marji is planetary. Winston is planetary. All unstated people are colourless. All planetary, colourless people are clitoral. If someone is planetary then they are unstated. Smart, planetary people are unstated. All pendulous people are unstated. Smart, clitoral people are modish. Marillin is not clitoral.", "logic": "\nColourless(marillin)\nPlanetary(marji)\nPlanetary(winston)\nforall x (Unstated(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Planetary(x) and Colourless(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Planetary(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) and Planetary(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Pendulous(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) and Clitoral(x) -> Modish(x))\n\nnot Clitoral(marillin)\n\nforall x (Planetary(x) and Colourless(x) -> Clitoral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Laurie is surmounted. Leeanne is ahorse. Ernie is ahorse. All beginning people are surmounted. All ahorse, surmounted people are outspread. If someone is ahorse then they are beginning. Smart, ahorse people are beginning. All planate people are beginning. Smart, outspread people are dormant. Laurie is green.", "logic": "\nSurmounted(laurie)\nAhorse(leeanne)\nAhorse(ernie)\nforall x (Beginning(x) -> Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Ahorse(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Outspread(x))\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Beginning(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) and Ahorse(x) -> Beginning(x))\nforall x (Planate(x) -> Beginning(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) and Outspread(x) -> Dormant(x))\n\nGreen(laurie)\n\nGreen(laurie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Richardo is belted. Sidonnie is zonal. Emelyne is zonal. All crannied people are belted. All zonal, belted people are fifteenth. If someone is zonal then they are crannied. Smart, zonal people are crannied. All touchable people are crannied. Smart, fifteenth people are cupric. Richardo is not touchable.", "logic": "\nBelted(richardo)\nZonal(sidonnie)\nZonal(emelyne)\nforall x (Crannied(x) -> Belted(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Belted(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Belted(x) and Zonal(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Touchable(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Belted(x) and Fifteenth(x) -> Cupric(x))\n\nnot Touchable(richardo)\n\nnot Touchable(richardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Abagail is purposeful. Ivor is still. Syd is still. All afrikaans people are purposeful. All still, purposeful people are colorful. If someone is still then they are afrikaans. Smart, still people are afrikaans. All aphanitic people are afrikaans. Smart, colorful people are brocaded. Ivor is aphanitic.", "logic": "\nPurposeful(abagail)\nStill(ivor)\nStill(syd)\nforall x (Afrikaans(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Still(x) and Purposeful(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Still(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and Still(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Aphanitic(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and Colorful(x) -> Brocaded(x))\n\nAphanitic(ivor)\n\nAphanitic(ivor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Inge is intricate. Wallas is amitotic. Shirlene is amitotic. All mismated people are intricate. All amitotic, intricate people are lite. If someone is amitotic then they are mismated. Smart, amitotic people are mismated. All marvelous people are mismated. Smart, lite people are lachrymal. Inge is not amitotic.", "logic": "\nIntricate(inge)\nAmitotic(wallas)\nAmitotic(shirlene)\nforall x (Mismated(x) -> Intricate(x))\nforall x (Amitotic(x) and Intricate(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Intricate(x) and Amitotic(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Intricate(x) and Lite(x) -> Lachrymal(x))\n\nnot Amitotic(inge)\n\nnot Amitotic(inge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Ailee is veracious. Corena is unvalued. Alex is unvalued. All gustatory people are veracious. All unvalued, veracious people are adient. If someone is unvalued then they are gustatory. Smart, unvalued people are gustatory. All undisputed people are gustatory. Smart, adient people are motiveless. Alex is green.", "logic": "\nVeracious(ailee)\nUnvalued(corena)\nUnvalued(alex)\nforall x (Gustatory(x) -> Veracious(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) and Veracious(x) -> Adient(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) -> Gustatory(x))\nforall x (Veracious(x) and Unvalued(x) -> Gustatory(x))\nforall x (Undisputed(x) -> Gustatory(x))\nforall x (Veracious(x) and Adient(x) -> Motiveless(x))\n\nGreen(alex)\n\nGreen(alex) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "The rob write the douglass. The rob seat the douglass. The rob seat the lucy. The douglass write the rob. The douglass write the lucy. The douglass seat the lucy. The lucy is onerous. The lucy is mesozoic. The lucy write the douglass. The lucy cushion the douglass. If something is onerous and it write the douglass then it seat the lucy. If something cushion the lucy then the lucy write the douglass. If something cushion the rob and it seat the rob then it cushion the douglass. If something seat the douglass then it is bogartian. If the douglass seat the lucy and the douglass write the rob then the rob seat the douglass. If something is onerous and it write the douglass then it seat the lucy. If something seat the lucy then it seat the douglass. If something seat the lucy and it is mesozoic then the lucy cushion the douglass. The rob write the douglass.", "logic": "\nWrite(rob, douglass)\nSeat(rob, douglass)\nSeat(rob, lucy)\nWrite(douglass, rob)\nWrite(douglass, lucy)\nSeat(douglass, lucy)\nOnerous(lucy)\nMesozoic(lucy)\nWrite(lucy, douglass)\nCushion(lucy, douglass)\nforall x (Onerous(x) and Write(x, douglass) -> Seat(x, lucy))\nforall x (Cushion(x, lucy) -> Write(lucy, douglass))\nforall x (Cushion(x, rob) and Seat(x, rob) -> Cushion(x, douglass))\nforall x (Seat(x, douglass) -> Bogartian(x))\nSeat(douglass, lucy) and Write(douglass, rob) -> Seat(rob, douglass)\nforall x (Onerous(x) and Write(x, douglass) -> Seat(x, lucy))\nforall x (Seat(x, lucy) -> Seat(x, douglass))\nforall x (Seat(x, lucy) and Mesozoic(x) -> Cushion(lucy, douglass))\n\nWrite(rob, douglass)\n\ntherefore Write(rob, douglass)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The gracia humanise the halie. The gracia cosponsor the halie. The gracia cosponsor the florry. The halie humanise the gracia. The halie humanise the florry. The halie cosponsor the florry. The florry is desecrated. The florry is robotlike. The florry humanise the halie. The florry misplay the halie. If something is desecrated and it humanise the halie then it cosponsor the florry. If something misplay the florry then the florry humanise the halie. If something misplay the gracia and it cosponsor the gracia then it misplay the halie. If something cosponsor the halie then it is shona. If the halie cosponsor the florry and the halie humanise the gracia then the gracia cosponsor the halie. If something is desecrated and it humanise the halie then it cosponsor the florry. If something cosponsor the florry then it cosponsor the halie. If something cosponsor the florry and it is robotlike then the florry misplay the halie. The florry does not visit the halie.", "logic": "\nHumanise(gracia, halie)\nCosponsor(gracia, halie)\nCosponsor(gracia, florry)\nHumanise(halie, gracia)\nHumanise(halie, florry)\nCosponsor(halie, florry)\nDesecrated(florry)\nRobotlike(florry)\nHumanise(florry, halie)\nMisplay(florry, halie)\nforall x (Desecrated(x) and Humanise(x, halie) -> Cosponsor(x, florry))\nforall x (Misplay(x, florry) -> Humanise(florry, halie))\nforall x (Misplay(x, gracia) and Cosponsor(x, gracia) -> Misplay(x, halie))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, halie) -> Shona(x))\nCosponsor(halie, florry) and Humanise(halie, gracia) -> Cosponsor(gracia, halie)\nforall x (Desecrated(x) and Humanise(x, halie) -> Cosponsor(x, florry))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, florry) -> Cosponsor(x, halie))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, florry) and Robotlike(x) -> Misplay(florry, halie))\n\nnot Misplay(florry, halie)\n\ntherefore Misplay(florry, halie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The levi posture the levin. The levi coquet the levin. The levi coquet the ralf. The levin posture the levi. The levin posture the ralf. The levin coquet the ralf. The ralf is realised. The ralf is clarifying. The ralf posture the levin. The ralf digitise the levin. If something is realised and it posture the levin then it coquet the ralf. If something digitise the ralf then the ralf posture the levin. If something digitise the levi and it coquet the levi then it digitise the levin. If something coquet the levin then it is anal. If the levin coquet the ralf and the levin posture the levi then the levi coquet the levin. If something is realised and it posture the levin then it coquet the ralf. If something coquet the ralf then it coquet the levin. If something coquet the ralf and it is clarifying then the ralf digitise the levin. The levin coquet the levin.", "logic": "\nPosture(levi, levin)\nCoquet(levi, levin)\nCoquet(levi, ralf)\nPosture(levin, levi)\nPosture(levin, ralf)\nCoquet(levin, ralf)\nRealised(ralf)\nClarifying(ralf)\nPosture(ralf, levin)\nDigitise(ralf, levin)\nforall x (Realised(x) and Posture(x, levin) -> Coquet(x, ralf))\nforall x (Digitise(x, ralf) -> Posture(ralf, levin))\nforall x (Digitise(x, levi) and Coquet(x, levi) -> Digitise(x, levin))\nforall x (Coquet(x, levin) -> Anal(x))\nCoquet(levin, ralf) and Posture(levin, levi) -> Coquet(levi, levin)\nforall x (Realised(x) and Posture(x, levin) -> Coquet(x, ralf))\nforall x (Coquet(x, ralf) -> Coquet(x, levin))\nforall x (Coquet(x, ralf) and Clarifying(x) -> Digitise(ralf, levin))\n\nCoquet(levin, levin)\n\nCoquet(levin, ralf) and forall x (Coquet(x, ralf) -> Coquet(x, levin)) -> therefore Coquet(levin, levin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The isabeau fagot the rolland. The isabeau alibi the rolland. The isabeau alibi the doralyn. The rolland fagot the isabeau. The rolland fagot the doralyn. The rolland alibi the doralyn. The doralyn is polyploid. The doralyn is unsigned. The doralyn fagot the rolland. The doralyn berate the rolland. If something is polyploid and it fagot the rolland then it alibi the doralyn. If something berate the doralyn then the doralyn fagot the rolland. If something berate the isabeau and it alibi the isabeau then it berate the rolland. If something alibi the rolland then it is tsaristic. If the rolland alibi the doralyn and the rolland fagot the isabeau then the isabeau alibi the rolland. If something is polyploid and it fagot the rolland then it alibi the doralyn. If something alibi the doralyn then it alibi the rolland. If something alibi the doralyn and it is unsigned then the doralyn berate the rolland. The isabeau is not tsaristic.", "logic": "\nFagot(isabeau, rolland)\nAlibi(isabeau, rolland)\nAlibi(isabeau, doralyn)\nFagot(rolland, isabeau)\nFagot(rolland, doralyn)\nAlibi(rolland, doralyn)\nPolyploid(doralyn)\nUnsigned(doralyn)\nFagot(doralyn, rolland)\nBerate(doralyn, rolland)\nforall x (Polyploid(x) and Fagot(x, rolland) -> Alibi(x, doralyn))\nforall x (Berate(x, doralyn) -> Fagot(doralyn, rolland))\nforall x (Berate(x, isabeau) and Alibi(x, isabeau) -> Berate(x, rolland))\nforall x (Alibi(x, rolland) -> Tsaristic(x))\nAlibi(rolland, doralyn) and Fagot(rolland, isabeau) -> Alibi(isabeau, rolland)\nforall x (Polyploid(x) and Fagot(x, rolland) -> Alibi(x, doralyn))\nforall x (Alibi(x, doralyn) -> Alibi(x, rolland))\nforall x (Alibi(x, doralyn) and Unsigned(x) -> Berate(doralyn, rolland))\n\nnot Tsaristic(isabeau)\n\nAlibi(isabeau, rolland) and forall x (Alibi(x, rolland) -> Tsaristic(x)) -> therefore Tsaristic(isabeau)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The corri scram the ailina. The corri cooperate the ailina. The corri cooperate the tami. The ailina scram the corri. The ailina scram the tami. The ailina cooperate the tami. The tami is conelike. The tami is protracted. The tami scram the ailina. The tami brush the ailina. If something is conelike and it scram the ailina then it cooperate the tami. If something brush the tami then the tami scram the ailina. If something brush the corri and it cooperate the corri then it brush the ailina. If something cooperate the ailina then it is endowed. If the ailina cooperate the tami and the ailina scram the corri then the corri cooperate the ailina. If something is conelike and it scram the ailina then it cooperate the tami. If something cooperate the tami then it cooperate the ailina. If something cooperate the tami and it is protracted then the tami brush the ailina. The ailina is endowed.", "logic": "\nScram(corri, ailina)\nCooperate(corri, ailina)\nCooperate(corri, tami)\nScram(ailina, corri)\nScram(ailina, tami)\nCooperate(ailina, tami)\nConelike(tami)\nProtracted(tami)\nScram(tami, ailina)\nBrush(tami, ailina)\nforall x (Conelike(x) and Scram(x, ailina) -> Cooperate(x, tami))\nforall x (Brush(x, tami) -> Scram(tami, ailina))\nforall x (Brush(x, corri) and Cooperate(x, corri) -> Brush(x, ailina))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, ailina) -> Endowed(x))\nCooperate(ailina, tami) and Scram(ailina, corri) -> Cooperate(corri, ailina)\nforall x (Conelike(x) and Scram(x, ailina) -> Cooperate(x, tami))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, tami) -> Cooperate(x, ailina))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, tami) and Protracted(x) -> Brush(tami, ailina))\n\nEndowed(ailina)\n\nCooperate(ailina, tami) and forall x (Cooperate(x, tami) -> Cooperate(x, ailina)) -> therefore Cooperate(ailina, ailina) Cooperate(ailina, ailina) and forall x (Cooperate(x, ailina) -> Endowed(x)) -> therefore Endowed(ailina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The alvina barbarise the adolphe. The alvina round the adolphe. The alvina round the andre. The adolphe barbarise the alvina. The adolphe barbarise the andre. The adolphe round the andre. The andre is crude. The andre is unglazed. The andre barbarise the adolphe. The andre assure the adolphe. If something is crude and it barbarise the adolphe then it round the andre. If something assure the andre then the andre barbarise the adolphe. If something assure the alvina and it round the alvina then it assure the adolphe. If something round the adolphe then it is bacterioid. If the adolphe round the andre and the adolphe barbarise the alvina then the alvina round the adolphe. If something is crude and it barbarise the adolphe then it round the andre. If something round the andre then it round the adolphe. If something round the andre and it is unglazed then the andre assure the adolphe. The adolphe is not bacterioid.", "logic": "\nBarbarise(alvina, adolphe)\nRound(alvina, adolphe)\nRound(alvina, andre)\nBarbarise(adolphe, alvina)\nBarbarise(adolphe, andre)\nRound(adolphe, andre)\nCrude(andre)\nUnglazed(andre)\nBarbarise(andre, adolphe)\nAssure(andre, adolphe)\nforall x (Crude(x) and Barbarise(x, adolphe) -> Round(x, andre))\nforall x (Assure(x, andre) -> Barbarise(andre, adolphe))\nforall x (Assure(x, alvina) and Round(x, alvina) -> Assure(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Round(x, adolphe) -> Bacterioid(x))\nRound(adolphe, andre) and Barbarise(adolphe, alvina) -> Round(alvina, adolphe)\nforall x (Crude(x) and Barbarise(x, adolphe) -> Round(x, andre))\nforall x (Round(x, andre) -> Round(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Round(x, andre) and Unglazed(x) -> Assure(andre, adolphe))\n\nnot Bacterioid(adolphe)\n\nRound(adolphe, andre) and forall x (Round(x, andre) -> Round(x, adolphe)) -> therefore Round(adolphe, adolphe) Round(adolphe, adolphe) and forall x (Round(x, adolphe) -> Bacterioid(x)) -> therefore Bacterioid(adolphe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The geneva liberate the magda. The geneva parget the magda. The geneva parget the cornelia. The magda liberate the geneva. The magda liberate the cornelia. The magda parget the cornelia. The cornelia is zoftig. The cornelia is auxiliary. The cornelia liberate the magda. The cornelia admix the magda. If something is zoftig and it liberate the magda then it parget the cornelia. If something admix the cornelia then the cornelia liberate the magda. If something admix the geneva and it parget the geneva then it admix the magda. If something parget the magda then it is stylised. If the magda parget the cornelia and the magda liberate the geneva then the geneva parget the magda. If something is zoftig and it liberate the magda then it parget the cornelia. If something parget the cornelia then it parget the magda. If something parget the cornelia and it is auxiliary then the cornelia admix the magda. The cornelia is stylised.", "logic": "\nLiberate(geneva, magda)\nParget(geneva, magda)\nParget(geneva, cornelia)\nLiberate(magda, geneva)\nLiberate(magda, cornelia)\nParget(magda, cornelia)\nZoftig(cornelia)\nAuxiliary(cornelia)\nLiberate(cornelia, magda)\nAdmix(cornelia, magda)\nforall x (Zoftig(x) and Liberate(x, magda) -> Parget(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Admix(x, cornelia) -> Liberate(cornelia, magda))\nforall x (Admix(x, geneva) and Parget(x, geneva) -> Admix(x, magda))\nforall x (Parget(x, magda) -> Stylised(x))\nParget(magda, cornelia) and Liberate(magda, geneva) -> Parget(geneva, magda)\nforall x (Zoftig(x) and Liberate(x, magda) -> Parget(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Parget(x, cornelia) -> Parget(x, magda))\nforall x (Parget(x, cornelia) and Auxiliary(x) -> Admix(cornelia, magda))\n\nStylised(cornelia)\n\nZoftig(cornelia) and Liberate(cornelia, magda) and forall x (Zoftig(x) and Liberate(x, magda) -> Parget(x, cornelia)) -> therefore Parget(cornelia, cornelia) Parget(cornelia, cornelia) and forall x (Parget(x, cornelia) -> Parget(x, magda)) -> therefore Parget(cornelia, magda) Parget(cornelia, magda) and forall x (Parget(x, magda) -> Stylised(x)) -> therefore Stylised(cornelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The ileana urbanize the selig. The ileana destruct the selig. The ileana destruct the ericka. The selig urbanize the ileana. The selig urbanize the ericka. The selig destruct the ericka. The ericka is colossal. The ericka is inharmonic. The ericka urbanize the selig. The ericka fleet the selig. If something is colossal and it urbanize the selig then it destruct the ericka. If something fleet the ericka then the ericka urbanize the selig. If something fleet the ileana and it destruct the ileana then it fleet the selig. If something destruct the selig then it is suffusive. If the selig destruct the ericka and the selig urbanize the ileana then the ileana destruct the selig. If something is colossal and it urbanize the selig then it destruct the ericka. If something destruct the ericka then it destruct the selig. If something destruct the ericka and it is inharmonic then the ericka fleet the selig. The ericka is not suffusive.", "logic": "\nUrbanize(ileana, selig)\nDestruct(ileana, selig)\nDestruct(ileana, ericka)\nUrbanize(selig, ileana)\nUrbanize(selig, ericka)\nDestruct(selig, ericka)\nColossal(ericka)\nInharmonic(ericka)\nUrbanize(ericka, selig)\nFleet(ericka, selig)\nforall x (Colossal(x) and Urbanize(x, selig) -> Destruct(x, ericka))\nforall x (Fleet(x, ericka) -> Urbanize(ericka, selig))\nforall x (Fleet(x, ileana) and Destruct(x, ileana) -> Fleet(x, selig))\nforall x (Destruct(x, selig) -> Suffusive(x))\nDestruct(selig, ericka) and Urbanize(selig, ileana) -> Destruct(ileana, selig)\nforall x (Colossal(x) and Urbanize(x, selig) -> Destruct(x, ericka))\nforall x (Destruct(x, ericka) -> Destruct(x, selig))\nforall x (Destruct(x, ericka) and Inharmonic(x) -> Fleet(ericka, selig))\n\nnot Suffusive(ericka)\n\nColossal(ericka) and Urbanize(ericka, selig) and forall x (Colossal(x) and Urbanize(x, selig) -> Destruct(x, ericka)) -> therefore Destruct(ericka, ericka) Destruct(ericka, ericka) and forall x (Destruct(x, ericka) -> Destruct(x, selig)) -> therefore Destruct(ericka, selig) Destruct(ericka, selig) and forall x (Destruct(x, selig) -> Suffusive(x)) -> therefore Suffusive(ericka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The leonanie thatch the caren. The leonanie obliterate the caren. The leonanie obliterate the romain. The caren thatch the leonanie. The caren thatch the romain. The caren obliterate the romain. The romain is goddamn. The romain is ridiculous. The romain thatch the caren. The romain islamise the caren. If something is goddamn and it thatch the caren then it obliterate the romain. If something islamise the romain then the romain thatch the caren. If something islamise the leonanie and it obliterate the leonanie then it islamise the caren. If something obliterate the caren then it is unattached. If the caren obliterate the romain and the caren thatch the leonanie then the leonanie obliterate the caren. If something is goddamn and it thatch the caren then it obliterate the romain. If something obliterate the romain then it obliterate the caren. If something obliterate the romain and it is ridiculous then the romain islamise the caren. The caren does not visit the caren.", "logic": "\nThatch(leonanie, caren)\nObliterate(leonanie, caren)\nObliterate(leonanie, romain)\nThatch(caren, leonanie)\nThatch(caren, romain)\nObliterate(caren, romain)\nGoddamn(romain)\nRidiculous(romain)\nThatch(romain, caren)\nIslamise(romain, caren)\nforall x (Goddamn(x) and Thatch(x, caren) -> Obliterate(x, romain))\nforall x (Islamise(x, romain) -> Thatch(romain, caren))\nforall x (Islamise(x, leonanie) and Obliterate(x, leonanie) -> Islamise(x, caren))\nforall x (Obliterate(x, caren) -> Unattached(x))\nObliterate(caren, romain) and Thatch(caren, leonanie) -> Obliterate(leonanie, caren)\nforall x (Goddamn(x) and Thatch(x, caren) -> Obliterate(x, romain))\nforall x (Obliterate(x, romain) -> Obliterate(x, caren))\nforall x (Obliterate(x, romain) and Ridiculous(x) -> Islamise(romain, caren))\n\nnot Islamise(caren, caren)\n\nforall x (Islamise(x, leonanie) and Obliterate(x, leonanie) -> Islamise(x, caren)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The shane gift the lavinia. The shane fail the lavinia. The shane fail the carter. The lavinia gift the shane. The lavinia gift the carter. The lavinia fail the carter. The carter is botanic. The carter is unsnarled. The carter gift the lavinia. The carter avoid the lavinia. If something is botanic and it gift the lavinia then it fail the carter. If something avoid the carter then the carter gift the lavinia. If something avoid the shane and it fail the shane then it avoid the lavinia. If something fail the lavinia then it is knightly. If the lavinia fail the carter and the lavinia gift the shane then the shane fail the lavinia. If something is botanic and it gift the lavinia then it fail the carter. If something fail the carter then it fail the lavinia. If something fail the carter and it is unsnarled then the carter avoid the lavinia. The shane avoid the lavinia.", "logic": "\nGift(shane, lavinia)\nFail(shane, lavinia)\nFail(shane, carter)\nGift(lavinia, shane)\nGift(lavinia, carter)\nFail(lavinia, carter)\nBotanic(carter)\nUnsnarled(carter)\nGift(carter, lavinia)\nAvoid(carter, lavinia)\nforall x (Botanic(x) and Gift(x, lavinia) -> Fail(x, carter))\nforall x (Avoid(x, carter) -> Gift(carter, lavinia))\nforall x (Avoid(x, shane) and Fail(x, shane) -> Avoid(x, lavinia))\nforall x (Fail(x, lavinia) -> Knightly(x))\nFail(lavinia, carter) and Gift(lavinia, shane) -> Fail(shane, lavinia)\nforall x (Botanic(x) and Gift(x, lavinia) -> Fail(x, carter))\nforall x (Fail(x, carter) -> Fail(x, lavinia))\nforall x (Fail(x, carter) and Unsnarled(x) -> Avoid(carter, lavinia))\n\nAvoid(shane, lavinia)\n\nforall x (Avoid(x, shane) and Fail(x, shane) -> Avoid(x, lavinia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The katharyn shampoo the minnie. The katharyn general the minnie. The katharyn general the ingelbert. The minnie shampoo the katharyn. The minnie shampoo the ingelbert. The minnie general the ingelbert. The ingelbert is unpressed. The ingelbert is gloved. The ingelbert shampoo the minnie. The ingelbert alienate the minnie. If something is unpressed and it shampoo the minnie then it general the ingelbert. If something alienate the ingelbert then the ingelbert shampoo the minnie. If something alienate the katharyn and it general the katharyn then it alienate the minnie. If something general the minnie then it is horrified. If the minnie general the ingelbert and the minnie shampoo the katharyn then the katharyn general the minnie. If something is unpressed and it shampoo the minnie then it general the ingelbert. If something general the ingelbert then it general the minnie. If something general the ingelbert and it is gloved then the ingelbert alienate the minnie. The minnie does not visit the katharyn.", "logic": "\nShampoo(katharyn, minnie)\nGeneral(katharyn, minnie)\nGeneral(katharyn, ingelbert)\nShampoo(minnie, katharyn)\nShampoo(minnie, ingelbert)\nGeneral(minnie, ingelbert)\nUnpressed(ingelbert)\nGloved(ingelbert)\nShampoo(ingelbert, minnie)\nAlienate(ingelbert, minnie)\nforall x (Unpressed(x) and Shampoo(x, minnie) -> General(x, ingelbert))\nforall x (Alienate(x, ingelbert) -> Shampoo(ingelbert, minnie))\nforall x (Alienate(x, katharyn) and General(x, katharyn) -> Alienate(x, minnie))\nforall x (General(x, minnie) -> Horrified(x))\nGeneral(minnie, ingelbert) and Shampoo(minnie, katharyn) -> General(katharyn, minnie)\nforall x (Unpressed(x) and Shampoo(x, minnie) -> General(x, ingelbert))\nforall x (General(x, ingelbert) -> General(x, minnie))\nforall x (General(x, ingelbert) and Gloved(x) -> Alienate(ingelbert, minnie))\n\nnot Alienate(minnie, katharyn)\n\nnot Alienate(minnie, katharyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The moise weep the amargo. The moise lull the amargo. The moise lull the welby. The amargo weep the moise. The amargo weep the welby. The amargo lull the welby. The welby is affine. The welby is multiple. The welby weep the amargo. The welby outlive the amargo. If something is affine and it weep the amargo then it lull the welby. If something outlive the welby then the welby weep the amargo. If something outlive the moise and it lull the moise then it outlive the amargo. If something lull the amargo then it is otiose. If the amargo lull the welby and the amargo weep the moise then the moise lull the amargo. If something is affine and it weep the amargo then it lull the welby. If something lull the welby then it lull the amargo. If something lull the welby and it is multiple then the welby outlive the amargo. The welby weep the welby.", "logic": "\nWeep(moise, amargo)\nLull(moise, amargo)\nLull(moise, welby)\nWeep(amargo, moise)\nWeep(amargo, welby)\nLull(amargo, welby)\nAffine(welby)\nMultiple(welby)\nWeep(welby, amargo)\nOutlive(welby, amargo)\nforall x (Affine(x) and Weep(x, amargo) -> Lull(x, welby))\nforall x (Outlive(x, welby) -> Weep(welby, amargo))\nforall x (Outlive(x, moise) and Lull(x, moise) -> Outlive(x, amargo))\nforall x (Lull(x, amargo) -> Otiose(x))\nLull(amargo, welby) and Weep(amargo, moise) -> Lull(moise, amargo)\nforall x (Affine(x) and Weep(x, amargo) -> Lull(x, welby))\nforall x (Lull(x, welby) -> Lull(x, amargo))\nforall x (Lull(x, welby) and Multiple(x) -> Outlive(welby, amargo))\n\nWeep(welby, welby)\n\nWeep(welby, welby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The roch spawn the theressa. The roch wrestle the theressa. The roch wrestle the rosaline. The theressa spawn the roch. The theressa spawn the rosaline. The theressa wrestle the rosaline. The rosaline is biddable. The rosaline is rasping. The rosaline spawn the theressa. The rosaline crap the theressa. If something is biddable and it spawn the theressa then it wrestle the rosaline. If something crap the rosaline then the rosaline spawn the theressa. If something crap the roch and it wrestle the roch then it crap the theressa. If something wrestle the theressa then it is skirting. If the theressa wrestle the rosaline and the theressa spawn the roch then the roch wrestle the theressa. If something is biddable and it spawn the theressa then it wrestle the rosaline. If something wrestle the rosaline then it wrestle the theressa. If something wrestle the rosaline and it is rasping then the rosaline crap the theressa. The rosaline does not see the roch.", "logic": "\nSpawn(roch, theressa)\nWrestle(roch, theressa)\nWrestle(roch, rosaline)\nSpawn(theressa, roch)\nSpawn(theressa, rosaline)\nWrestle(theressa, rosaline)\nBiddable(rosaline)\nRasping(rosaline)\nSpawn(rosaline, theressa)\nCrap(rosaline, theressa)\nforall x (Biddable(x) and Spawn(x, theressa) -> Wrestle(x, rosaline))\nforall x (Crap(x, rosaline) -> Spawn(rosaline, theressa))\nforall x (Crap(x, roch) and Wrestle(x, roch) -> Crap(x, theressa))\nforall x (Wrestle(x, theressa) -> Skirting(x))\nWrestle(theressa, rosaline) and Spawn(theressa, roch) -> Wrestle(roch, theressa)\nforall x (Biddable(x) and Spawn(x, theressa) -> Wrestle(x, rosaline))\nforall x (Wrestle(x, rosaline) -> Wrestle(x, theressa))\nforall x (Wrestle(x, rosaline) and Rasping(x) -> Crap(rosaline, theressa))\n\nnot Wrestle(rosaline, roch)\n\nnot Wrestle(rosaline, roch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The wit overrefine the corina. The wit prink the corina. The wit prink the karita. The corina overrefine the wit. The corina overrefine the karita. The corina prink the karita. The karita is spurned. The karita is expensive. The karita overrefine the corina. The karita trowel the corina. If something is spurned and it overrefine the corina then it prink the karita. If something trowel the karita then the karita overrefine the corina. If something trowel the wit and it prink the wit then it trowel the corina. If something prink the corina then it is slurred. If the corina prink the karita and the corina overrefine the wit then the wit prink the corina. If something is spurned and it overrefine the corina then it prink the karita. If something prink the karita then it prink the corina. If something prink the karita and it is expensive then the karita trowel the corina. The wit is kind.", "logic": "\nOverrefine(wit, corina)\nPrink(wit, corina)\nPrink(wit, karita)\nOverrefine(corina, wit)\nOverrefine(corina, karita)\nPrink(corina, karita)\nSpurned(karita)\nExpensive(karita)\nOverrefine(karita, corina)\nTrowel(karita, corina)\nforall x (Spurned(x) and Overrefine(x, corina) -> Prink(x, karita))\nforall x (Trowel(x, karita) -> Overrefine(karita, corina))\nforall x (Trowel(x, wit) and Prink(x, wit) -> Trowel(x, corina))\nforall x (Prink(x, corina) -> Slurred(x))\nPrink(corina, karita) and Overrefine(corina, wit) -> Prink(wit, corina)\nforall x (Spurned(x) and Overrefine(x, corina) -> Prink(x, karita))\nforall x (Prink(x, karita) -> Prink(x, corina))\nforall x (Prink(x, karita) and Expensive(x) -> Trowel(karita, corina))\n\nKind(wit)\n\nKind(wit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The anica retroflex the marcie. The anica corkscrew the marcie. The anica corkscrew the dwaine. The marcie retroflex the anica. The marcie retroflex the dwaine. The marcie corkscrew the dwaine. The dwaine is expansive. The dwaine is exuvial. The dwaine retroflex the marcie. The dwaine skewer the marcie. If something is expansive and it retroflex the marcie then it corkscrew the dwaine. If something skewer the dwaine then the dwaine retroflex the marcie. If something skewer the anica and it corkscrew the anica then it skewer the marcie. If something corkscrew the marcie then it is twiggy. If the marcie corkscrew the dwaine and the marcie retroflex the anica then the anica corkscrew the marcie. If something is expansive and it retroflex the marcie then it corkscrew the dwaine. If something corkscrew the dwaine then it corkscrew the marcie. If something corkscrew the dwaine and it is exuvial then the dwaine skewer the marcie. The dwaine is not rough.", "logic": "\nRetroflex(anica, marcie)\nCorkscrew(anica, marcie)\nCorkscrew(anica, dwaine)\nRetroflex(marcie, anica)\nRetroflex(marcie, dwaine)\nCorkscrew(marcie, dwaine)\nExpansive(dwaine)\nExuvial(dwaine)\nRetroflex(dwaine, marcie)\nSkewer(dwaine, marcie)\nforall x (Expansive(x) and Retroflex(x, marcie) -> Corkscrew(x, dwaine))\nforall x (Skewer(x, dwaine) -> Retroflex(dwaine, marcie))\nforall x (Skewer(x, anica) and Corkscrew(x, anica) -> Skewer(x, marcie))\nforall x (Corkscrew(x, marcie) -> Twiggy(x))\nCorkscrew(marcie, dwaine) and Retroflex(marcie, anica) -> Corkscrew(anica, marcie)\nforall x (Expansive(x) and Retroflex(x, marcie) -> Corkscrew(x, dwaine))\nforall x (Corkscrew(x, dwaine) -> Corkscrew(x, marcie))\nforall x (Corkscrew(x, dwaine) and Exuvial(x) -> Skewer(dwaine, marcie))\n\nnot Rough(dwaine)\n\nnot Rough(dwaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The tallia foreground the reagan. The tallia fress the reagan. The tallia fress the judd. The reagan foreground the tallia. The reagan foreground the judd. The reagan fress the judd. The judd is unenviable. The judd is crumbly. The judd foreground the reagan. The judd mantle the reagan. If something is unenviable and it foreground the reagan then it fress the judd. If something mantle the judd then the judd foreground the reagan. If something mantle the tallia and it fress the tallia then it mantle the reagan. If something fress the reagan then it is benignant. If the reagan fress the judd and the reagan foreground the tallia then the tallia fress the reagan. If something is unenviable and it foreground the reagan then it fress the judd. If something fress the judd then it fress the reagan. If something fress the judd and it is crumbly then the judd mantle the reagan. The judd foreground the tallia.", "logic": "\nForeground(tallia, reagan)\nFress(tallia, reagan)\nFress(tallia, judd)\nForeground(reagan, tallia)\nForeground(reagan, judd)\nFress(reagan, judd)\nUnenviable(judd)\nCrumbly(judd)\nForeground(judd, reagan)\nMantle(judd, reagan)\nforall x (Unenviable(x) and Foreground(x, reagan) -> Fress(x, judd))\nforall x (Mantle(x, judd) -> Foreground(judd, reagan))\nforall x (Mantle(x, tallia) and Fress(x, tallia) -> Mantle(x, reagan))\nforall x (Fress(x, reagan) -> Benignant(x))\nFress(reagan, judd) and Foreground(reagan, tallia) -> Fress(tallia, reagan)\nforall x (Unenviable(x) and Foreground(x, reagan) -> Fress(x, judd))\nforall x (Fress(x, judd) -> Fress(x, reagan))\nforall x (Fress(x, judd) and Crumbly(x) -> Mantle(judd, reagan))\n\nForeground(judd, tallia)\n\nForeground(judd, tallia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "Barbi is bloodshot. All nether things are clinched. If Barbi is mesmerized and Barbi is nether then Barbi is clinched. All mesmerized, bloodshot things are antemortem. If something is clinched and nether then it is antemortem. If Barbi is bloodshot then Barbi is fogbound. Kind things are nether. If something is bloodshot and clinched then it is not vestigial. If something is bloodshot and nether then it is not vestigial. Barbi is bloodshot.", "logic": "\nBloodshot(barbi)\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Clinched(x))\nMesmerized(barbi) and Nether(barbi) -> Clinched(barbi)\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Bloodshot(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Clinched(x) and Nether(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nBloodshot(barbi) -> Fogbound(barbi)\nforall x (Fogbound(x) -> Nether(x))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) and Clinched(x) -> not Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) and Nether(x) -> not Vestigial(x))\n\nBloodshot(barbi)\n\ntherefore Bloodshot(barbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Rosemarie is prudish. All synchronal things are archaistic. If Rosemarie is fucking and Rosemarie is synchronal then Rosemarie is archaistic. All fucking, prudish things are strait. If something is archaistic and synchronal then it is strait. If Rosemarie is prudish then Rosemarie is burundian. Kind things are synchronal. If something is prudish and archaistic then it is not enabling. If something is prudish and synchronal then it is not enabling. Rosemarie is not prudish.", "logic": "\nPrudish(rosemarie)\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Archaistic(x))\nFucking(rosemarie) and Synchronal(rosemarie) -> Archaistic(rosemarie)\nforall x (Fucking(x) and Prudish(x) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Archaistic(x) and Synchronal(x) -> Strait(x))\nPrudish(rosemarie) -> Burundian(rosemarie)\nforall x (Burundian(x) -> Synchronal(x))\nforall x (Prudish(x) and Archaistic(x) -> not Enabling(x))\nforall x (Prudish(x) and Synchronal(x) -> not Enabling(x))\n\nnot Prudish(rosemarie)\n\ntherefore Prudish(rosemarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Neala is discordant. All positive things are bugged. If Neala is hurried and Neala is positive then Neala is bugged. All hurried, discordant things are resonant. If something is bugged and positive then it is resonant. If Neala is discordant then Neala is scurfy. Kind things are positive. If something is discordant and bugged then it is not veined. If something is discordant and positive then it is not veined. Neala is scurfy.", "logic": "\nDiscordant(neala)\nforall x (Positive(x) -> Bugged(x))\nHurried(neala) and Positive(neala) -> Bugged(neala)\nforall x (Hurried(x) and Discordant(x) -> Resonant(x))\nforall x (Bugged(x) and Positive(x) -> Resonant(x))\nDiscordant(neala) -> Scurfy(neala)\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Positive(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) and Bugged(x) -> not Veined(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) and Positive(x) -> not Veined(x))\n\nScurfy(neala)\n\nDiscordant(neala) and Discordant(neala) -> Scurfy(neala) -> therefore Scurfy(neala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Neille is scalic. All bogartian things are spartan. If Neille is qualified and Neille is bogartian then Neille is spartan. All qualified, scalic things are improvised. If something is spartan and bogartian then it is improvised. If Neille is scalic then Neille is coplanar. Kind things are bogartian. If something is scalic and spartan then it is not midi. If something is scalic and bogartian then it is not midi. Neille is not coplanar.", "logic": "\nScalic(neille)\nforall x (Bogartian(x) -> Spartan(x))\nQualified(neille) and Bogartian(neille) -> Spartan(neille)\nforall x (Qualified(x) and Scalic(x) -> Improvised(x))\nforall x (Spartan(x) and Bogartian(x) -> Improvised(x))\nScalic(neille) -> Coplanar(neille)\nforall x (Coplanar(x) -> Bogartian(x))\nforall x (Scalic(x) and Spartan(x) -> not Midi(x))\nforall x (Scalic(x) and Bogartian(x) -> not Midi(x))\n\nnot Coplanar(neille)\n\nScalic(neille) and Scalic(neille) -> Coplanar(neille) -> therefore Coplanar(neille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Tad is endovenous. All anxiolytic things are fledged. If Tad is unspoiled and Tad is anxiolytic then Tad is fledged. All unspoiled, endovenous things are bantoid. If something is fledged and anxiolytic then it is bantoid. If Tad is endovenous then Tad is choppy. Kind things are anxiolytic. If something is endovenous and fledged then it is not dyadic. If something is endovenous and anxiolytic then it is not dyadic. Tad is anxiolytic.", "logic": "\nEndovenous(tad)\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Fledged(x))\nUnspoiled(tad) and Anxiolytic(tad) -> Fledged(tad)\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) and Endovenous(x) -> Bantoid(x))\nforall x (Fledged(x) and Anxiolytic(x) -> Bantoid(x))\nEndovenous(tad) -> Choppy(tad)\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Fledged(x) -> not Dyadic(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Anxiolytic(x) -> not Dyadic(x))\n\nAnxiolytic(tad)\n\nEndovenous(tad) and Endovenous(tad) -> Choppy(tad) -> therefore Choppy(tad) Choppy(tad) and forall x (Choppy(x) -> Anxiolytic(x)) -> therefore Anxiolytic(tad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Tobi is unrimed. All clannish things are univalve. If Tobi is fordable and Tobi is clannish then Tobi is univalve. All fordable, unrimed things are horrid. If something is univalve and clannish then it is horrid. If Tobi is unrimed then Tobi is zestful. Kind things are clannish. If something is unrimed and univalve then it is not amusive. If something is unrimed and clannish then it is not amusive. Tobi is not clannish.", "logic": "\nUnrimed(tobi)\nforall x (Clannish(x) -> Univalve(x))\nFordable(tobi) and Clannish(tobi) -> Univalve(tobi)\nforall x (Fordable(x) and Unrimed(x) -> Horrid(x))\nforall x (Univalve(x) and Clannish(x) -> Horrid(x))\nUnrimed(tobi) -> Zestful(tobi)\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Clannish(x))\nforall x (Unrimed(x) and Univalve(x) -> not Amusive(x))\nforall x (Unrimed(x) and Clannish(x) -> not Amusive(x))\n\nnot Clannish(tobi)\n\nUnrimed(tobi) and Unrimed(tobi) -> Zestful(tobi) -> therefore Zestful(tobi) Zestful(tobi) and forall x (Zestful(x) -> Clannish(x)) -> therefore Clannish(tobi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Celisse is airborne. All jobless things are fugitive. If Celisse is appointed and Celisse is jobless then Celisse is fugitive. All appointed, airborne things are commanding. If something is fugitive and jobless then it is commanding. If Celisse is airborne then Celisse is bicuspid. Kind things are jobless. If something is airborne and fugitive then it is not cilial. If something is airborne and jobless then it is not cilial. Celisse is fugitive.", "logic": "\nAirborne(celisse)\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nAppointed(celisse) and Jobless(celisse) -> Fugitive(celisse)\nforall x (Appointed(x) and Airborne(x) -> Commanding(x))\nforall x (Fugitive(x) and Jobless(x) -> Commanding(x))\nAirborne(celisse) -> Bicuspid(celisse)\nforall x (Bicuspid(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) and Fugitive(x) -> not Cilial(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) and Jobless(x) -> not Cilial(x))\n\nFugitive(celisse)\n\nAirborne(celisse) and Airborne(celisse) -> Bicuspid(celisse) -> therefore Bicuspid(celisse) Bicuspid(celisse) and forall x (Bicuspid(x) -> Jobless(x)) -> therefore Jobless(celisse) Jobless(celisse) and forall x (Jobless(x) -> Fugitive(x)) -> therefore Fugitive(celisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Madeleine is colored. All ulterior things are parotid. If Madeleine is fell and Madeleine is ulterior then Madeleine is parotid. All fell, colored things are graspable. If something is parotid and ulterior then it is graspable. If Madeleine is colored then Madeleine is trojan. Kind things are ulterior. If something is colored and parotid then it is not kindred. If something is colored and ulterior then it is not kindred. Madeleine is kindred.", "logic": "\nColored(madeleine)\nforall x (Ulterior(x) -> Parotid(x))\nFell(madeleine) and Ulterior(madeleine) -> Parotid(madeleine)\nforall x (Fell(x) and Colored(x) -> Graspable(x))\nforall x (Parotid(x) and Ulterior(x) -> Graspable(x))\nColored(madeleine) -> Trojan(madeleine)\nforall x (Trojan(x) -> Ulterior(x))\nforall x (Colored(x) and Parotid(x) -> not Kindred(x))\nforall x (Colored(x) and Ulterior(x) -> not Kindred(x))\n\nKindred(madeleine)\n\nColored(madeleine) and Colored(madeleine) -> Trojan(madeleine) -> therefore Trojan(madeleine) Trojan(madeleine) and forall x (Trojan(x) -> Ulterior(x)) -> therefore Ulterior(madeleine) Colored(madeleine) and Ulterior(madeleine) and forall x (Colored(x) and Ulterior(x) -> not Kindred(x)) -> therefore not Kindred(madeleine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Pippa is petty. Franz is currish. Guido is calendered. All liberal, petty people are symbolic. If Guido is petty then Guido is not cosmogenic. If Franz is currish and Franz is raging then Franz is calendered. If someone is petty and cosmogenic then they are not liberal. All calendered people are petty. If Guido is not cosmogenic then Guido is currish. Franz is currish.", "logic": "\nPetty(pippa)\nCurrish(franz)\nCalendered(guido)\nforall x (Liberal(x) and Petty(x) -> Symbolic(x))\nPetty(guido) -> not Cosmogenic(guido)\nCurrish(franz) and Raging(franz) -> Calendered(franz)\nforall x (Petty(x) and Cosmogenic(x) -> not Liberal(x))\nforall x (Calendered(x) -> Petty(x))\nnot Cosmogenic(guido) -> Currish(guido)\n\nCurrish(franz)\n\ntherefore Currish(franz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Apostolos is apart. Bing is biyearly. Witold is prepaid. All numerate, apart people are capacious. If Witold is apart then Witold is not germy. If Bing is biyearly and Bing is eight then Bing is prepaid. If someone is apart and germy then they are not numerate. All prepaid people are apart. If Witold is not germy then Witold is biyearly. Apostolos is not apart.", "logic": "\nApart(apostolos)\nBiyearly(bing)\nPrepaid(witold)\nforall x (Numerate(x) and Apart(x) -> Capacious(x))\nApart(witold) -> not Germy(witold)\nBiyearly(bing) and Eight(bing) -> Prepaid(bing)\nforall x (Apart(x) and Germy(x) -> not Numerate(x))\nforall x (Prepaid(x) -> Apart(x))\nnot Germy(witold) -> Biyearly(witold)\n\nnot Apart(apostolos)\n\ntherefore Apart(apostolos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Cloris is praetorian. Roland is asinine. Quincy is misbranded. All unwilling, praetorian people are colour. If Quincy is praetorian then Quincy is not thumping. If Roland is asinine and Roland is void then Roland is misbranded. If someone is praetorian and thumping then they are not unwilling. All misbranded people are praetorian. If Quincy is not thumping then Quincy is asinine. Quincy is praetorian.", "logic": "\nPraetorian(cloris)\nAsinine(roland)\nMisbranded(quincy)\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and Praetorian(x) -> Colour(x))\nPraetorian(quincy) -> not Thumping(quincy)\nAsinine(roland) and Void(roland) -> Misbranded(roland)\nforall x (Praetorian(x) and Thumping(x) -> not Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) -> Praetorian(x))\nnot Thumping(quincy) -> Asinine(quincy)\n\nPraetorian(quincy)\n\nMisbranded(quincy) and forall x (Misbranded(x) -> Praetorian(x)) -> therefore Praetorian(quincy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Marris is cranky. Netta is lxvii. Gae is unarmored. All obvious, cranky people are bookish. If Gae is cranky then Gae is not unenviable. If Netta is lxvii and Netta is commensal then Netta is unarmored. If someone is cranky and unenviable then they are not obvious. All unarmored people are cranky. If Gae is not unenviable then Gae is lxvii. Gae is not cranky.", "logic": "\nCranky(marris)\nLxvii(netta)\nUnarmored(gae)\nforall x (Obvious(x) and Cranky(x) -> Bookish(x))\nCranky(gae) -> not Unenviable(gae)\nLxvii(netta) and Commensal(netta) -> Unarmored(netta)\nforall x (Cranky(x) and Unenviable(x) -> not Obvious(x))\nforall x (Unarmored(x) -> Cranky(x))\nnot Unenviable(gae) -> Lxvii(gae)\n\nnot Cranky(gae)\n\nUnarmored(gae) and forall x (Unarmored(x) -> Cranky(x)) -> therefore Cranky(gae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Mateo is profound. Ramsay is flamboyant. Dara is likeable. All disjunct, profound people are dietetic. If Dara is profound then Dara is not presto. If Ramsay is flamboyant and Ramsay is heliac then Ramsay is likeable. If someone is profound and presto then they are not disjunct. All likeable people are profound. If Dara is not presto then Dara is flamboyant. Dara is not presto.", "logic": "\nProfound(mateo)\nFlamboyant(ramsay)\nLikeable(dara)\nforall x (Disjunct(x) and Profound(x) -> Dietetic(x))\nProfound(dara) -> not Presto(dara)\nFlamboyant(ramsay) and Heliac(ramsay) -> Likeable(ramsay)\nforall x (Profound(x) and Presto(x) -> not Disjunct(x))\nforall x (Likeable(x) -> Profound(x))\nnot Presto(dara) -> Flamboyant(dara)\n\nnot Presto(dara)\n\nLikeable(dara) and forall x (Likeable(x) -> Profound(x)) -> therefore Profound(dara) Profound(dara) and Profound(dara) -> not Presto(dara) -> therefore not Presto(dara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Mikey is doleful. Fianna is morphemic. Lucia is bothersome. All unworried, doleful people are brief. If Lucia is doleful then Lucia is not immutable. If Fianna is morphemic and Fianna is nonracist then Fianna is bothersome. If someone is doleful and immutable then they are not unworried. All bothersome people are doleful. If Lucia is not immutable then Lucia is morphemic. Lucia is immutable.", "logic": "\nDoleful(mikey)\nMorphemic(fianna)\nBothersome(lucia)\nforall x (Unworried(x) and Doleful(x) -> Brief(x))\nDoleful(lucia) -> not Immutable(lucia)\nMorphemic(fianna) and Nonracist(fianna) -> Bothersome(fianna)\nforall x (Doleful(x) and Immutable(x) -> not Unworried(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) -> Doleful(x))\nnot Immutable(lucia) -> Morphemic(lucia)\n\nImmutable(lucia)\n\nBothersome(lucia) and forall x (Bothersome(x) -> Doleful(x)) -> therefore Doleful(lucia) Doleful(lucia) and Doleful(lucia) -> not Immutable(lucia) -> therefore not Immutable(lucia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Evania is aperiodic. Broddie is mottled. Carolyn is jetting. All roguish, aperiodic people are unworldly. If Carolyn is aperiodic then Carolyn is not overhand. If Broddie is mottled and Broddie is tahitian then Broddie is jetting. If someone is aperiodic and overhand then they are not roguish. All jetting people are aperiodic. If Carolyn is not overhand then Carolyn is mottled. Carolyn is mottled.", "logic": "\nAperiodic(evania)\nMottled(broddie)\nJetting(carolyn)\nforall x (Roguish(x) and Aperiodic(x) -> Unworldly(x))\nAperiodic(carolyn) -> not Overhand(carolyn)\nMottled(broddie) and Tahitian(broddie) -> Jetting(broddie)\nforall x (Aperiodic(x) and Overhand(x) -> not Roguish(x))\nforall x (Jetting(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nnot Overhand(carolyn) -> Mottled(carolyn)\n\nMottled(carolyn)\n\nJetting(carolyn) and forall x (Jetting(x) -> Aperiodic(x)) -> therefore Aperiodic(carolyn) Aperiodic(carolyn) and Aperiodic(carolyn) -> not Overhand(carolyn) -> therefore not Overhand(carolyn) not Overhand(carolyn) and not Overhand(carolyn) -> Mottled(carolyn) -> therefore Mottled(carolyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Tatiania is peculiar. Pascal is seventh. Brynne is auxinic. All adagio, peculiar people are beady. If Brynne is peculiar then Brynne is not legitimate. If Pascal is seventh and Pascal is prayerful then Pascal is auxinic. If someone is peculiar and legitimate then they are not adagio. All auxinic people are peculiar. If Brynne is not legitimate then Brynne is seventh. Brynne is not seventh.", "logic": "\nPeculiar(tatiania)\nSeventh(pascal)\nAuxinic(brynne)\nforall x (Adagio(x) and Peculiar(x) -> Beady(x))\nPeculiar(brynne) -> not Legitimate(brynne)\nSeventh(pascal) and Prayerful(pascal) -> Auxinic(pascal)\nforall x (Peculiar(x) and Legitimate(x) -> not Adagio(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> Peculiar(x))\nnot Legitimate(brynne) -> Seventh(brynne)\n\nnot Seventh(brynne)\n\nAuxinic(brynne) and forall x (Auxinic(x) -> Peculiar(x)) -> therefore Peculiar(brynne) Peculiar(brynne) and Peculiar(brynne) -> not Legitimate(brynne) -> therefore not Legitimate(brynne) not Legitimate(brynne) and not Legitimate(brynne) -> Seventh(brynne) -> therefore Seventh(brynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Katerine is infuriated. Evan is agrologic. Colette is touristy. All carboxyl, infuriated people are tufted. If Colette is infuriated then Colette is not fruity. If Evan is agrologic and Evan is convulsive then Evan is touristy. If someone is infuriated and fruity then they are not carboxyl. All touristy people are infuriated. If Colette is not fruity then Colette is agrologic. Katerine is not tufted.", "logic": "\nInfuriated(katerine)\nAgrologic(evan)\nTouristy(colette)\nforall x (Carboxyl(x) and Infuriated(x) -> Tufted(x))\nInfuriated(colette) -> not Fruity(colette)\nAgrologic(evan) and Convulsive(evan) -> Touristy(evan)\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Fruity(x) -> not Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Touristy(x) -> Infuriated(x))\nnot Fruity(colette) -> Agrologic(colette)\n\nnot Tufted(katerine)\n\nforall x (Carboxyl(x) and Infuriated(x) -> Tufted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Dela is provoked. Celine is benzylic. Carilyn is gripping. All unmanlike, provoked people are earthen. If Carilyn is provoked then Carilyn is not watered. If Celine is benzylic and Celine is boolean then Celine is gripping. If someone is provoked and watered then they are not unmanlike. All gripping people are provoked. If Carilyn is not watered then Carilyn is benzylic. Celine is earthen.", "logic": "\nProvoked(dela)\nBenzylic(celine)\nGripping(carilyn)\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) and Provoked(x) -> Earthen(x))\nProvoked(carilyn) -> not Watered(carilyn)\nBenzylic(celine) and Boolean(celine) -> Gripping(celine)\nforall x (Provoked(x) and Watered(x) -> not Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Gripping(x) -> Provoked(x))\nnot Watered(carilyn) -> Benzylic(carilyn)\n\nEarthen(celine)\n\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) and Provoked(x) -> Earthen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Olivette is cragfast. Buster is purging. Annabel is vinegarish. All ineffable, cragfast people are fahrenheit. If Annabel is cragfast then Annabel is not czech. If Buster is purging and Buster is crappy then Buster is vinegarish. If someone is cragfast and czech then they are not ineffable. All vinegarish people are cragfast. If Annabel is not czech then Annabel is purging. Annabel is not fahrenheit.", "logic": "\nCragfast(olivette)\nPurging(buster)\nVinegarish(annabel)\nforall x (Ineffable(x) and Cragfast(x) -> Fahrenheit(x))\nCragfast(annabel) -> not Czech(annabel)\nPurging(buster) and Crappy(buster) -> Vinegarish(buster)\nforall x (Cragfast(x) and Czech(x) -> not Ineffable(x))\nforall x (Vinegarish(x) -> Cragfast(x))\nnot Czech(annabel) -> Purging(annabel)\n\nnot Fahrenheit(annabel)\n\nforall x (Ineffable(x) and Cragfast(x) -> Fahrenheit(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Raymundo is empathic. Thurstan is unalarming. Kevina is newfound. All haunting, empathic people are abroad. If Kevina is empathic then Kevina is not sloping. If Thurstan is unalarming and Thurstan is jordanian then Thurstan is newfound. If someone is empathic and sloping then they are not haunting. All newfound people are empathic. If Kevina is not sloping then Kevina is unalarming. Thurstan is newfound.", "logic": "\nEmpathic(raymundo)\nUnalarming(thurstan)\nNewfound(kevina)\nforall x (Haunting(x) and Empathic(x) -> Abroad(x))\nEmpathic(kevina) -> not Sloping(kevina)\nUnalarming(thurstan) and Jordanian(thurstan) -> Newfound(thurstan)\nforall x (Empathic(x) and Sloping(x) -> not Haunting(x))\nforall x (Newfound(x) -> Empathic(x))\nnot Sloping(kevina) -> Unalarming(kevina)\n\nNewfound(thurstan)\n\nUnalarming(thurstan) and Jordanian(thurstan) -> Newfound(thurstan) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Marina is articular. Merrie is brief. Kinna is curative. All anurous, articular people are aegean. If Kinna is articular then Kinna is not unworthy. If Merrie is brief and Merrie is stark then Merrie is curative. If someone is articular and unworthy then they are not anurous. All curative people are articular. If Kinna is not unworthy then Kinna is brief. Marina is not stark.", "logic": "\nArticular(marina)\nBrief(merrie)\nCurative(kinna)\nforall x (Anurous(x) and Articular(x) -> Aegean(x))\nArticular(kinna) -> not Unworthy(kinna)\nBrief(merrie) and Stark(merrie) -> Curative(merrie)\nforall x (Articular(x) and Unworthy(x) -> not Anurous(x))\nforall x (Curative(x) -> Articular(x))\nnot Unworthy(kinna) -> Brief(kinna)\n\nnot Stark(marina)\n\nnot Stark(marina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Amie is desecrated. Stephana is third. Rosella is subaquatic. All iridaceous, desecrated people are jaunty. If Rosella is desecrated then Rosella is not unalloyed. If Stephana is third and Stephana is inhuman then Stephana is subaquatic. If someone is desecrated and unalloyed then they are not iridaceous. All subaquatic people are desecrated. If Rosella is not unalloyed then Rosella is third. Amie is subaquatic.", "logic": "\nDesecrated(amie)\nThird(stephana)\nSubaquatic(rosella)\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) and Desecrated(x) -> Jaunty(x))\nDesecrated(rosella) -> not Unalloyed(rosella)\nThird(stephana) and Inhuman(stephana) -> Subaquatic(stephana)\nforall x (Desecrated(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> not Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Desecrated(x))\nnot Unalloyed(rosella) -> Third(rosella)\n\nSubaquatic(amie)\n\nSubaquatic(amie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Etienne is offshore. Charlott is extravert. Beowulf is master. All beat, offshore people are some. If Beowulf is offshore then Beowulf is not halcyon. If Charlott is extravert and Charlott is undreamed then Charlott is master. If someone is offshore and halcyon then they are not beat. All master people are offshore. If Beowulf is not halcyon then Beowulf is extravert. Beowulf is not beat.", "logic": "\nOffshore(etienne)\nExtravert(charlott)\nMaster(beowulf)\nforall x (Beat(x) and Offshore(x) -> Some(x))\nOffshore(beowulf) -> not Halcyon(beowulf)\nExtravert(charlott) and Undreamed(charlott) -> Master(charlott)\nforall x (Offshore(x) and Halcyon(x) -> not Beat(x))\nforall x (Master(x) -> Offshore(x))\nnot Halcyon(beowulf) -> Extravert(beowulf)\n\nnot Beat(beowulf)\n\nnot Beat(beowulf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Mahesh is gruelling. Silvia is hydraulic. Sivert is unwrinkled. All nonrandom, gruelling people are anapaestic. If Sivert is gruelling then Sivert is not built. If Silvia is hydraulic and Silvia is avestan then Silvia is unwrinkled. If someone is gruelling and built then they are not nonrandom. All unwrinkled people are gruelling. If Sivert is not built then Sivert is hydraulic. Mahesh is nonrandom.", "logic": "\nGruelling(mahesh)\nHydraulic(silvia)\nUnwrinkled(sivert)\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and Gruelling(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nGruelling(sivert) -> not Built(sivert)\nHydraulic(silvia) and Avestan(silvia) -> Unwrinkled(silvia)\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and Built(x) -> not Nonrandom(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Gruelling(x))\nnot Built(sivert) -> Hydraulic(sivert)\n\nNonrandom(mahesh)\n\nNonrandom(mahesh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "The laural is double. The laural is suppressed. The laural is bonelike. The laural is diabolical. The laural repeat the kenneth. The laural repeat the lanna. The laural trump the lanna. The kenneth sulk the laural. The kenneth is corded. The kenneth repeat the laural. The kenneth repeat the lanna. The kenneth trump the laural. The kenneth trump the lanna. The lanna sulk the laural. The lanna trump the laural. The lanna trump the kenneth. If something trump the kenneth then the kenneth sulk the lanna. If something sulk the lanna then the lanna repeat the laural. If something is double then it repeat the kenneth. If something trump the kenneth then it repeat the lanna. If something is diabolical and it sulk the laural then the laural is double. If something trump the lanna and the lanna repeat the laural then the lanna is bonelike. The laural is suppressed.", "logic": "\nDouble(laural)\nSuppressed(laural)\nBonelike(laural)\nDiabolical(laural)\nRepeat(laural, kenneth)\nRepeat(laural, lanna)\nTrump(laural, lanna)\nSulk(kenneth, laural)\nCorded(kenneth)\nRepeat(kenneth, laural)\nRepeat(kenneth, lanna)\nTrump(kenneth, laural)\nTrump(kenneth, lanna)\nSulk(lanna, laural)\nTrump(lanna, laural)\nTrump(lanna, kenneth)\nforall x (Trump(x, kenneth) -> Sulk(kenneth, lanna))\nforall x (Sulk(x, lanna) -> Repeat(lanna, laural))\nforall x (Double(x) -> Repeat(x, kenneth))\nforall x (Trump(x, kenneth) -> Repeat(x, lanna))\nforall x (Diabolical(x) and Sulk(x, laural) -> Double(laural))\nforall x (Trump(x, lanna) and Repeat(lanna, laural) -> Bonelike(lanna))\n\nSuppressed(laural)\n\ntherefore Suppressed(laural)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The yancey is worthful. The yancey is xxii. The yancey is posterior. The yancey is extravert. The yancey offload the kandy. The yancey offload the reynolds. The yancey agree the reynolds. The kandy gather the yancey. The kandy is epicene. The kandy offload the yancey. The kandy offload the reynolds. The kandy agree the yancey. The kandy agree the reynolds. The reynolds gather the yancey. The reynolds agree the yancey. The reynolds agree the kandy. If something agree the kandy then the kandy gather the reynolds. If something gather the reynolds then the reynolds offload the yancey. If something is worthful then it offload the kandy. If something agree the kandy then it offload the reynolds. If something is extravert and it gather the yancey then the yancey is worthful. If something agree the reynolds and the reynolds offload the yancey then the reynolds is posterior. The kandy does not visit the yancey.", "logic": "\nWorthful(yancey)\nXxii(yancey)\nPosterior(yancey)\nExtravert(yancey)\nOffload(yancey, kandy)\nOffload(yancey, reynolds)\nAgree(yancey, reynolds)\nGather(kandy, yancey)\nEpicene(kandy)\nOffload(kandy, yancey)\nOffload(kandy, reynolds)\nAgree(kandy, yancey)\nAgree(kandy, reynolds)\nGather(reynolds, yancey)\nAgree(reynolds, yancey)\nAgree(reynolds, kandy)\nforall x (Agree(x, kandy) -> Gather(kandy, reynolds))\nforall x (Gather(x, reynolds) -> Offload(reynolds, yancey))\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> Offload(x, kandy))\nforall x (Agree(x, kandy) -> Offload(x, reynolds))\nforall x (Extravert(x) and Gather(x, yancey) -> Worthful(yancey))\nforall x (Agree(x, reynolds) and Offload(reynolds, yancey) -> Posterior(reynolds))\n\nnot Agree(kandy, yancey)\n\ntherefore Agree(kandy, yancey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The marena is freckled. The marena is viceregal. The marena is irenic. The marena is otiose. The marena steamer the xylina. The marena steamer the ambros. The marena fatigue the ambros. The xylina trade the marena. The xylina is dietetic. The xylina steamer the marena. The xylina steamer the ambros. The xylina fatigue the marena. The xylina fatigue the ambros. The ambros trade the marena. The ambros fatigue the marena. The ambros fatigue the xylina. If something fatigue the xylina then the xylina trade the ambros. If something trade the ambros then the ambros steamer the marena. If something is freckled then it steamer the xylina. If something fatigue the xylina then it steamer the ambros. If something is otiose and it trade the marena then the marena is freckled. If something fatigue the ambros and the ambros steamer the marena then the ambros is irenic. The xylina trade the ambros.", "logic": "\nFreckled(marena)\nViceregal(marena)\nIrenic(marena)\nOtiose(marena)\nSteamer(marena, xylina)\nSteamer(marena, ambros)\nFatigue(marena, ambros)\nTrade(xylina, marena)\nDietetic(xylina)\nSteamer(xylina, marena)\nSteamer(xylina, ambros)\nFatigue(xylina, marena)\nFatigue(xylina, ambros)\nTrade(ambros, marena)\nFatigue(ambros, marena)\nFatigue(ambros, xylina)\nforall x (Fatigue(x, xylina) -> Trade(xylina, ambros))\nforall x (Trade(x, ambros) -> Steamer(ambros, marena))\nforall x (Freckled(x) -> Steamer(x, xylina))\nforall x (Fatigue(x, xylina) -> Steamer(x, ambros))\nforall x (Otiose(x) and Trade(x, marena) -> Freckled(marena))\nforall x (Fatigue(x, ambros) and Steamer(ambros, marena) -> Irenic(ambros))\n\nTrade(xylina, ambros)\n\nFatigue(ambros, xylina) and forall x (Fatigue(x, xylina) -> Trade(xylina, ambros)) -> therefore Trade(xylina, ambros)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The maxi is ahorseback. The maxi is even. The maxi is tertian. The maxi is hexed. The maxi dishonor the morrie. The maxi dishonor the katusha. The maxi furbish the katusha. The morrie scratch the maxi. The morrie is mutual. The morrie dishonor the maxi. The morrie dishonor the katusha. The morrie furbish the maxi. The morrie furbish the katusha. The katusha scratch the maxi. The katusha furbish the maxi. The katusha furbish the morrie. If something furbish the morrie then the morrie scratch the katusha. If something scratch the katusha then the katusha dishonor the maxi. If something is ahorseback then it dishonor the morrie. If something furbish the morrie then it dishonor the katusha. If something is hexed and it scratch the maxi then the maxi is ahorseback. If something furbish the katusha and the katusha dishonor the maxi then the katusha is tertian. The morrie does not chase the katusha.", "logic": "\nAhorseback(maxi)\nEven(maxi)\nTertian(maxi)\nHexed(maxi)\nDishonor(maxi, morrie)\nDishonor(maxi, katusha)\nFurbish(maxi, katusha)\nScratch(morrie, maxi)\nMutual(morrie)\nDishonor(morrie, maxi)\nDishonor(morrie, katusha)\nFurbish(morrie, maxi)\nFurbish(morrie, katusha)\nScratch(katusha, maxi)\nFurbish(katusha, maxi)\nFurbish(katusha, morrie)\nforall x (Furbish(x, morrie) -> Scratch(morrie, katusha))\nforall x (Scratch(x, katusha) -> Dishonor(katusha, maxi))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> Dishonor(x, morrie))\nforall x (Furbish(x, morrie) -> Dishonor(x, katusha))\nforall x (Hexed(x) and Scratch(x, maxi) -> Ahorseback(maxi))\nforall x (Furbish(x, katusha) and Dishonor(katusha, maxi) -> Tertian(katusha))\n\nnot Scratch(morrie, katusha)\n\nFurbish(katusha, morrie) and forall x (Furbish(x, morrie) -> Scratch(morrie, katusha)) -> therefore Scratch(morrie, katusha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The hassan is fictile. The hassan is opencut. The hassan is wholesome. The hassan is glaring. The hassan charm the lauretta. The hassan charm the debora. The hassan attest the debora. The lauretta freshen the hassan. The lauretta is seeming. The lauretta charm the hassan. The lauretta charm the debora. The lauretta attest the hassan. The lauretta attest the debora. The debora freshen the hassan. The debora attest the hassan. The debora attest the lauretta. If something attest the lauretta then the lauretta freshen the debora. If something freshen the debora then the debora charm the hassan. If something is fictile then it charm the lauretta. If something attest the lauretta then it charm the debora. If something is glaring and it freshen the hassan then the hassan is fictile. If something attest the debora and the debora charm the hassan then the debora is wholesome. The debora charm the hassan.", "logic": "\nFictile(hassan)\nOpencut(hassan)\nWholesome(hassan)\nGlaring(hassan)\nCharm(hassan, lauretta)\nCharm(hassan, debora)\nAttest(hassan, debora)\nFreshen(lauretta, hassan)\nSeeming(lauretta)\nCharm(lauretta, hassan)\nCharm(lauretta, debora)\nAttest(lauretta, hassan)\nAttest(lauretta, debora)\nFreshen(debora, hassan)\nAttest(debora, hassan)\nAttest(debora, lauretta)\nforall x (Attest(x, lauretta) -> Freshen(lauretta, debora))\nforall x (Freshen(x, debora) -> Charm(debora, hassan))\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Charm(x, lauretta))\nforall x (Attest(x, lauretta) -> Charm(x, debora))\nforall x (Glaring(x) and Freshen(x, hassan) -> Fictile(hassan))\nforall x (Attest(x, debora) and Charm(debora, hassan) -> Wholesome(debora))\n\nCharm(debora, hassan)\n\nAttest(debora, lauretta) and forall x (Attest(x, lauretta) -> Freshen(lauretta, debora)) -> therefore Freshen(lauretta, debora) Freshen(lauretta, debora) and forall x (Freshen(x, debora) -> Charm(debora, hassan)) -> therefore Charm(debora, hassan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The issi is dozen. The issi is real. The issi is lumpy. The issi is surface. The issi fossilize the alford. The issi fossilize the sancho. The issi severalize the sancho. The alford filter the issi. The alford is sabine. The alford fossilize the issi. The alford fossilize the sancho. The alford severalize the issi. The alford severalize the sancho. The sancho filter the issi. The sancho severalize the issi. The sancho severalize the alford. If something severalize the alford then the alford filter the sancho. If something filter the sancho then the sancho fossilize the issi. If something is dozen then it fossilize the alford. If something severalize the alford then it fossilize the sancho. If something is surface and it filter the issi then the issi is dozen. If something severalize the sancho and the sancho fossilize the issi then the sancho is lumpy. The sancho does not need the issi.", "logic": "\nDozen(issi)\nReal(issi)\nLumpy(issi)\nSurface(issi)\nFossilize(issi, alford)\nFossilize(issi, sancho)\nSeveralize(issi, sancho)\nFilter(alford, issi)\nSabine(alford)\nFossilize(alford, issi)\nFossilize(alford, sancho)\nSeveralize(alford, issi)\nSeveralize(alford, sancho)\nFilter(sancho, issi)\nSeveralize(sancho, issi)\nSeveralize(sancho, alford)\nforall x (Severalize(x, alford) -> Filter(alford, sancho))\nforall x (Filter(x, sancho) -> Fossilize(sancho, issi))\nforall x (Dozen(x) -> Fossilize(x, alford))\nforall x (Severalize(x, alford) -> Fossilize(x, sancho))\nforall x (Surface(x) and Filter(x, issi) -> Dozen(issi))\nforall x (Severalize(x, sancho) and Fossilize(sancho, issi) -> Lumpy(sancho))\n\nnot Fossilize(sancho, issi)\n\nSeveralize(sancho, alford) and forall x (Severalize(x, alford) -> Filter(alford, sancho)) -> therefore Filter(alford, sancho) Filter(alford, sancho) and forall x (Filter(x, sancho) -> Fossilize(sancho, issi)) -> therefore Fossilize(sancho, issi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The james is ammino. The james is sweetened. The james is pestering. The james is incurious. The james outwit the ines. The james outwit the valdemar. The james gradate the valdemar. The ines fleece the james. The ines is elflike. The ines outwit the james. The ines outwit the valdemar. The ines gradate the james. The ines gradate the valdemar. The valdemar fleece the james. The valdemar gradate the james. The valdemar gradate the ines. If something gradate the ines then the ines fleece the valdemar. If something fleece the valdemar then the valdemar outwit the james. If something is ammino then it outwit the ines. If something gradate the ines then it outwit the valdemar. If something is incurious and it fleece the james then the james is ammino. If something gradate the valdemar and the valdemar outwit the james then the valdemar is pestering. The valdemar is pestering.", "logic": "\nAmmino(james)\nSweetened(james)\nPestering(james)\nIncurious(james)\nOutwit(james, ines)\nOutwit(james, valdemar)\nGradate(james, valdemar)\nFleece(ines, james)\nElflike(ines)\nOutwit(ines, james)\nOutwit(ines, valdemar)\nGradate(ines, james)\nGradate(ines, valdemar)\nFleece(valdemar, james)\nGradate(valdemar, james)\nGradate(valdemar, ines)\nforall x (Gradate(x, ines) -> Fleece(ines, valdemar))\nforall x (Fleece(x, valdemar) -> Outwit(valdemar, james))\nforall x (Ammino(x) -> Outwit(x, ines))\nforall x (Gradate(x, ines) -> Outwit(x, valdemar))\nforall x (Incurious(x) and Fleece(x, james) -> Ammino(james))\nforall x (Gradate(x, valdemar) and Outwit(valdemar, james) -> Pestering(valdemar))\n\nPestering(valdemar)\n\nGradate(valdemar, ines) and forall x (Gradate(x, ines) -> Fleece(ines, valdemar)) -> therefore Fleece(ines, valdemar) Fleece(ines, valdemar) and forall x (Fleece(x, valdemar) -> Outwit(valdemar, james)) -> therefore Outwit(valdemar, james) Gradate(ines, valdemar) and Outwit(valdemar, james) and forall x (Gradate(x, valdemar) and Outwit(valdemar, james) -> Pestering(valdemar)) -> therefore Pestering(valdemar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The way is optional. The way is turkmen. The way is basined. The way is bleak. The way outscore the coriss. The way outscore the reece. The way dusk the reece. The coriss laugh the way. The coriss is freelance. The coriss outscore the way. The coriss outscore the reece. The coriss dusk the way. The coriss dusk the reece. The reece laugh the way. The reece dusk the way. The reece dusk the coriss. If something dusk the coriss then the coriss laugh the reece. If something laugh the reece then the reece outscore the way. If something is optional then it outscore the coriss. If something dusk the coriss then it outscore the reece. If something is bleak and it laugh the way then the way is optional. If something dusk the reece and the reece outscore the way then the reece is basined. The reece is not basined.", "logic": "\nOptional(way)\nTurkmen(way)\nBasined(way)\nBleak(way)\nOutscore(way, coriss)\nOutscore(way, reece)\nDusk(way, reece)\nLaugh(coriss, way)\nFreelance(coriss)\nOutscore(coriss, way)\nOutscore(coriss, reece)\nDusk(coriss, way)\nDusk(coriss, reece)\nLaugh(reece, way)\nDusk(reece, way)\nDusk(reece, coriss)\nforall x (Dusk(x, coriss) -> Laugh(coriss, reece))\nforall x (Laugh(x, reece) -> Outscore(reece, way))\nforall x (Optional(x) -> Outscore(x, coriss))\nforall x (Dusk(x, coriss) -> Outscore(x, reece))\nforall x (Bleak(x) and Laugh(x, way) -> Optional(way))\nforall x (Dusk(x, reece) and Outscore(reece, way) -> Basined(reece))\n\nnot Basined(reece)\n\nDusk(reece, coriss) and forall x (Dusk(x, coriss) -> Laugh(coriss, reece)) -> therefore Laugh(coriss, reece) Laugh(coriss, reece) and forall x (Laugh(x, reece) -> Outscore(reece, way)) -> therefore Outscore(reece, way) Dusk(coriss, reece) and Outscore(reece, way) and forall x (Dusk(x, reece) and Outscore(reece, way) -> Basined(reece)) -> therefore Basined(reece)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The ilse is beheaded. The ilse is unjointed. The ilse is clausal. The ilse is latter. The ilse purify the callida. The ilse purify the ariana. The ilse purpurate the ariana. The callida forego the ilse. The callida is subscribed. The callida purify the ilse. The callida purify the ariana. The callida purpurate the ilse. The callida purpurate the ariana. The ariana forego the ilse. The ariana purpurate the ilse. The ariana purpurate the callida. If something purpurate the callida then the callida forego the ariana. If something forego the ariana then the ariana purify the ilse. If something is beheaded then it purify the callida. If something purpurate the callida then it purify the ariana. If something is latter and it forego the ilse then the ilse is beheaded. If something purpurate the ariana and the ariana purify the ilse then the ariana is clausal. The callida does not need the callida.", "logic": "\nBeheaded(ilse)\nUnjointed(ilse)\nClausal(ilse)\nLatter(ilse)\nPurify(ilse, callida)\nPurify(ilse, ariana)\nPurpurate(ilse, ariana)\nForego(callida, ilse)\nSubscribed(callida)\nPurify(callida, ilse)\nPurify(callida, ariana)\nPurpurate(callida, ilse)\nPurpurate(callida, ariana)\nForego(ariana, ilse)\nPurpurate(ariana, ilse)\nPurpurate(ariana, callida)\nforall x (Purpurate(x, callida) -> Forego(callida, ariana))\nforall x (Forego(x, ariana) -> Purify(ariana, ilse))\nforall x (Beheaded(x) -> Purify(x, callida))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, callida) -> Purify(x, ariana))\nforall x (Latter(x) and Forego(x, ilse) -> Beheaded(ilse))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, ariana) and Purify(ariana, ilse) -> Clausal(ariana))\n\nnot Purify(callida, callida)\n\nforall x (Beheaded(x) -> Purify(x, callida)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The olive is purgative. The olive is spurned. The olive is socratic. The olive is nurturant. The olive smut the elyn. The olive smut the willmott. The olive sing the willmott. The elyn revel the olive. The elyn is scheduled. The elyn smut the olive. The elyn smut the willmott. The elyn sing the olive. The elyn sing the willmott. The willmott revel the olive. The willmott sing the olive. The willmott sing the elyn. If something sing the elyn then the elyn revel the willmott. If something revel the willmott then the willmott smut the olive. If something is purgative then it smut the elyn. If something sing the elyn then it smut the willmott. If something is nurturant and it revel the olive then the olive is purgative. If something sing the willmott and the willmott smut the olive then the willmott is socratic. The willmott smut the elyn.", "logic": "\nPurgative(olive)\nSpurned(olive)\nSocratic(olive)\nNurturant(olive)\nSmut(olive, elyn)\nSmut(olive, willmott)\nSing(olive, willmott)\nRevel(elyn, olive)\nScheduled(elyn)\nSmut(elyn, olive)\nSmut(elyn, willmott)\nSing(elyn, olive)\nSing(elyn, willmott)\nRevel(willmott, olive)\nSing(willmott, olive)\nSing(willmott, elyn)\nforall x (Sing(x, elyn) -> Revel(elyn, willmott))\nforall x (Revel(x, willmott) -> Smut(willmott, olive))\nforall x (Purgative(x) -> Smut(x, elyn))\nforall x (Sing(x, elyn) -> Smut(x, willmott))\nforall x (Nurturant(x) and Revel(x, olive) -> Purgative(olive))\nforall x (Sing(x, willmott) and Smut(willmott, olive) -> Socratic(willmott))\n\nSmut(willmott, elyn)\n\nforall x (Purgative(x) -> Smut(x, elyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The dorotea is skittish. The dorotea is officious. The dorotea is kindred. The dorotea is blonde. The dorotea startle the marrilee. The dorotea startle the gerianna. The dorotea injure the gerianna. The marrilee disgust the dorotea. The marrilee is reflex. The marrilee startle the dorotea. The marrilee startle the gerianna. The marrilee injure the dorotea. The marrilee injure the gerianna. The gerianna disgust the dorotea. The gerianna injure the dorotea. The gerianna injure the marrilee. If something injure the marrilee then the marrilee disgust the gerianna. If something disgust the gerianna then the gerianna startle the dorotea. If something is skittish then it startle the marrilee. If something injure the marrilee then it startle the gerianna. If something is blonde and it disgust the dorotea then the dorotea is skittish. If something injure the gerianna and the gerianna startle the dorotea then the gerianna is kindred. The marrilee does not visit the marrilee.", "logic": "\nSkittish(dorotea)\nOfficious(dorotea)\nKindred(dorotea)\nBlonde(dorotea)\nStartle(dorotea, marrilee)\nStartle(dorotea, gerianna)\nInjure(dorotea, gerianna)\nDisgust(marrilee, dorotea)\nReflex(marrilee)\nStartle(marrilee, dorotea)\nStartle(marrilee, gerianna)\nInjure(marrilee, dorotea)\nInjure(marrilee, gerianna)\nDisgust(gerianna, dorotea)\nInjure(gerianna, dorotea)\nInjure(gerianna, marrilee)\nforall x (Injure(x, marrilee) -> Disgust(marrilee, gerianna))\nforall x (Disgust(x, gerianna) -> Startle(gerianna, dorotea))\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Startle(x, marrilee))\nforall x (Injure(x, marrilee) -> Startle(x, gerianna))\nforall x (Blonde(x) and Disgust(x, dorotea) -> Skittish(dorotea))\nforall x (Injure(x, gerianna) and Startle(gerianna, dorotea) -> Kindred(gerianna))\n\nnot Injure(marrilee, marrilee)\n\nnot Injure(marrilee, marrilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The yevette is munificent. The yevette is matched. The yevette is roily. The yevette is rowdy. The yevette convoke the gertie. The yevette convoke the willette. The yevette tape the willette. The gertie calibrate the yevette. The gertie is gradual. The gertie convoke the yevette. The gertie convoke the willette. The gertie tape the yevette. The gertie tape the willette. The willette calibrate the yevette. The willette tape the yevette. The willette tape the gertie. If something tape the gertie then the gertie calibrate the willette. If something calibrate the willette then the willette convoke the yevette. If something is munificent then it convoke the gertie. If something tape the gertie then it convoke the willette. If something is rowdy and it calibrate the yevette then the yevette is munificent. If something tape the willette and the willette convoke the yevette then the willette is roily. The willette calibrate the gertie.", "logic": "\nMunificent(yevette)\nMatched(yevette)\nRoily(yevette)\nRowdy(yevette)\nConvoke(yevette, gertie)\nConvoke(yevette, willette)\nTape(yevette, willette)\nCalibrate(gertie, yevette)\nGradual(gertie)\nConvoke(gertie, yevette)\nConvoke(gertie, willette)\nTape(gertie, yevette)\nTape(gertie, willette)\nCalibrate(willette, yevette)\nTape(willette, yevette)\nTape(willette, gertie)\nforall x (Tape(x, gertie) -> Calibrate(gertie, willette))\nforall x (Calibrate(x, willette) -> Convoke(willette, yevette))\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Convoke(x, gertie))\nforall x (Tape(x, gertie) -> Convoke(x, willette))\nforall x (Rowdy(x) and Calibrate(x, yevette) -> Munificent(yevette))\nforall x (Tape(x, willette) and Convoke(willette, yevette) -> Roily(willette))\n\nCalibrate(willette, gertie)\n\nCalibrate(willette, gertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The giselle is delineate. The giselle is manifest. The giselle is sublime. The giselle is twofold. The giselle pause the lorri. The giselle pause the marsiella. The giselle befriend the marsiella. The lorri resurge the giselle. The lorri is morbific. The lorri pause the giselle. The lorri pause the marsiella. The lorri befriend the giselle. The lorri befriend the marsiella. The marsiella resurge the giselle. The marsiella befriend the giselle. The marsiella befriend the lorri. If something befriend the lorri then the lorri resurge the marsiella. If something resurge the marsiella then the marsiella pause the giselle. If something is delineate then it pause the lorri. If something befriend the lorri then it pause the marsiella. If something is twofold and it resurge the giselle then the giselle is delineate. If something befriend the marsiella and the marsiella pause the giselle then the marsiella is sublime. The giselle does not need the giselle.", "logic": "\nDelineate(giselle)\nManifest(giselle)\nSublime(giselle)\nTwofold(giselle)\nPause(giselle, lorri)\nPause(giselle, marsiella)\nBefriend(giselle, marsiella)\nResurge(lorri, giselle)\nMorbific(lorri)\nPause(lorri, giselle)\nPause(lorri, marsiella)\nBefriend(lorri, giselle)\nBefriend(lorri, marsiella)\nResurge(marsiella, giselle)\nBefriend(marsiella, giselle)\nBefriend(marsiella, lorri)\nforall x (Befriend(x, lorri) -> Resurge(lorri, marsiella))\nforall x (Resurge(x, marsiella) -> Pause(marsiella, giselle))\nforall x (Delineate(x) -> Pause(x, lorri))\nforall x (Befriend(x, lorri) -> Pause(x, marsiella))\nforall x (Twofold(x) and Resurge(x, giselle) -> Delineate(giselle))\nforall x (Befriend(x, marsiella) and Pause(marsiella, giselle) -> Sublime(marsiella))\n\nnot Pause(giselle, giselle)\n\nnot Pause(giselle, giselle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The daryl is mucosal. The daryl is leisurely. The daryl is seasick. The daryl is baptistic. The daryl gargle the dasya. The daryl gargle the nikkie. The daryl level the nikkie. The dasya tabularize the daryl. The dasya is mitigatory. The dasya gargle the daryl. The dasya gargle the nikkie. The dasya level the daryl. The dasya level the nikkie. The nikkie tabularize the daryl. The nikkie level the daryl. The nikkie level the dasya. If something level the dasya then the dasya tabularize the nikkie. If something tabularize the nikkie then the nikkie gargle the daryl. If something is mucosal then it gargle the dasya. If something level the dasya then it gargle the nikkie. If something is baptistic and it tabularize the daryl then the daryl is mucosal. If something level the nikkie and the nikkie gargle the daryl then the nikkie is seasick. The daryl tabularize the daryl.", "logic": "\nMucosal(daryl)\nLeisurely(daryl)\nSeasick(daryl)\nBaptistic(daryl)\nGargle(daryl, dasya)\nGargle(daryl, nikkie)\nLevel(daryl, nikkie)\nTabularize(dasya, daryl)\nMitigatory(dasya)\nGargle(dasya, daryl)\nGargle(dasya, nikkie)\nLevel(dasya, daryl)\nLevel(dasya, nikkie)\nTabularize(nikkie, daryl)\nLevel(nikkie, daryl)\nLevel(nikkie, dasya)\nforall x (Level(x, dasya) -> Tabularize(dasya, nikkie))\nforall x (Tabularize(x, nikkie) -> Gargle(nikkie, daryl))\nforall x (Mucosal(x) -> Gargle(x, dasya))\nforall x (Level(x, dasya) -> Gargle(x, nikkie))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Tabularize(x, daryl) -> Mucosal(daryl))\nforall x (Level(x, nikkie) and Gargle(nikkie, daryl) -> Seasick(nikkie))\n\nTabularize(daryl, daryl)\n\nTabularize(daryl, daryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The elspeth is seaworthy. The elspeth is dolomitic. The elspeth is monoploid. The elspeth is livery. The elspeth monitor the bucky. The elspeth monitor the erek. The elspeth denote the erek. The bucky devour the elspeth. The bucky is funicular. The bucky monitor the elspeth. The bucky monitor the erek. The bucky denote the elspeth. The bucky denote the erek. The erek devour the elspeth. The erek denote the elspeth. The erek denote the bucky. If something denote the bucky then the bucky devour the erek. If something devour the erek then the erek monitor the elspeth. If something is seaworthy then it monitor the bucky. If something denote the bucky then it monitor the erek. If something is livery and it devour the elspeth then the elspeth is seaworthy. If something denote the erek and the erek monitor the elspeth then the erek is monoploid. The erek is not livery.", "logic": "\nSeaworthy(elspeth)\nDolomitic(elspeth)\nMonoploid(elspeth)\nLivery(elspeth)\nMonitor(elspeth, bucky)\nMonitor(elspeth, erek)\nDenote(elspeth, erek)\nDevour(bucky, elspeth)\nFunicular(bucky)\nMonitor(bucky, elspeth)\nMonitor(bucky, erek)\nDenote(bucky, elspeth)\nDenote(bucky, erek)\nDevour(erek, elspeth)\nDenote(erek, elspeth)\nDenote(erek, bucky)\nforall x (Denote(x, bucky) -> Devour(bucky, erek))\nforall x (Devour(x, erek) -> Monitor(erek, elspeth))\nforall x (Seaworthy(x) -> Monitor(x, bucky))\nforall x (Denote(x, bucky) -> Monitor(x, erek))\nforall x (Livery(x) and Devour(x, elspeth) -> Seaworthy(elspeth))\nforall x (Denote(x, erek) and Monitor(erek, elspeth) -> Monoploid(erek))\n\nnot Livery(erek)\n\nnot Livery(erek) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The trevar is liable. The trevar is jerky. The trevar is slummy. The trevar is unbacked. The trevar roost the teddie. The trevar roost the frannie. The trevar putrefy the frannie. The teddie novelise the trevar. The teddie is latish. The teddie roost the trevar. The teddie roost the frannie. The teddie putrefy the trevar. The teddie putrefy the frannie. The frannie novelise the trevar. The frannie putrefy the trevar. The frannie putrefy the teddie. If something putrefy the teddie then the teddie novelise the frannie. If something novelise the frannie then the frannie roost the trevar. If something is liable then it roost the teddie. If something putrefy the teddie then it roost the frannie. If something is unbacked and it novelise the trevar then the trevar is liable. If something putrefy the frannie and the frannie roost the trevar then the frannie is slummy. The frannie is liable.", "logic": "\nLiable(trevar)\nJerky(trevar)\nSlummy(trevar)\nUnbacked(trevar)\nRoost(trevar, teddie)\nRoost(trevar, frannie)\nPutrefy(trevar, frannie)\nNovelise(teddie, trevar)\nLatish(teddie)\nRoost(teddie, trevar)\nRoost(teddie, frannie)\nPutrefy(teddie, trevar)\nPutrefy(teddie, frannie)\nNovelise(frannie, trevar)\nPutrefy(frannie, trevar)\nPutrefy(frannie, teddie)\nforall x (Putrefy(x, teddie) -> Novelise(teddie, frannie))\nforall x (Novelise(x, frannie) -> Roost(frannie, trevar))\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Roost(x, teddie))\nforall x (Putrefy(x, teddie) -> Roost(x, frannie))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) and Novelise(x, trevar) -> Liable(trevar))\nforall x (Putrefy(x, frannie) and Roost(frannie, trevar) -> Slummy(frannie))\n\nLiable(frannie)\n\nLiable(frannie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "Shel is kindly. Shel is nonelected. Shel is abashed. Shel is civil. Shel is gnostic. Shel is shaken. Shel is tremendous. Austen is kindly. Austen is nonelected. Austen is civil. Kind, tremendous people are gnostic. If Shel is kindly and Shel is nonelected then Shel is shaken. White people are abashed. If someone is abashed and tremendous then they are civil. If someone is civil and abashed then they are nonelected. Nice people are tremendous. If someone is shaken and abashed then they are kindly. All gnostic people are tremendous. Austen is nonelected.", "logic": "\nKindly(shel)\nNonelected(shel)\nAbashed(shel)\nCivil(shel)\nGnostic(shel)\nShaken(shel)\nTremendous(shel)\nKindly(austen)\nNonelected(austen)\nCivil(austen)\nforall x (Abashed(x) and Tremendous(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nKindly(shel) and Nonelected(shel) -> Shaken(shel)\nforall x (Tremendous(x) -> Abashed(x))\nforall x (Abashed(x) and Tremendous(x) -> Civil(x))\nforall x (Civil(x) and Abashed(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Civil(x) -> Tremendous(x))\nforall x (Shaken(x) and Abashed(x) -> Kindly(x))\nforall x (Gnostic(x) -> Tremendous(x))\n\nNonelected(austen)\n\ntherefore Nonelected(austen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Nadia is bracteate. Nadia is peripheral. Nadia is acarpelous. Nadia is flip. Nadia is hindoo. Nadia is botswanan. Nadia is positivist. Arne is bracteate. Arne is peripheral. Arne is flip. Kind, positivist people are hindoo. If Nadia is bracteate and Nadia is peripheral then Nadia is botswanan. White people are acarpelous. If someone is acarpelous and positivist then they are flip. If someone is flip and acarpelous then they are peripheral. Nice people are positivist. If someone is botswanan and acarpelous then they are bracteate. All hindoo people are positivist. Nadia is not hindoo.", "logic": "\nBracteate(nadia)\nPeripheral(nadia)\nAcarpelous(nadia)\nFlip(nadia)\nHindoo(nadia)\nBotswanan(nadia)\nPositivist(nadia)\nBracteate(arne)\nPeripheral(arne)\nFlip(arne)\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and Positivist(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nBracteate(nadia) and Peripheral(nadia) -> Botswanan(nadia)\nforall x (Positivist(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and Positivist(x) -> Flip(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) and Acarpelous(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Positivist(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Acarpelous(x) -> Bracteate(x))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) -> Positivist(x))\n\nnot Hindoo(nadia)\n\ntherefore Hindoo(nadia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Jojo is braised. Jojo is unaccepted. Jojo is vacuous. Jojo is quotidian. Jojo is onomastic. Jojo is warming. Jojo is pleading. Charo is braised. Charo is unaccepted. Charo is quotidian. Kind, pleading people are onomastic. If Jojo is braised and Jojo is unaccepted then Jojo is warming. White people are vacuous. If someone is vacuous and pleading then they are quotidian. If someone is quotidian and vacuous then they are unaccepted. Nice people are pleading. If someone is warming and vacuous then they are braised. All onomastic people are pleading. Charo is pleading.", "logic": "\nBraised(jojo)\nUnaccepted(jojo)\nVacuous(jojo)\nQuotidian(jojo)\nOnomastic(jojo)\nWarming(jojo)\nPleading(jojo)\nBraised(charo)\nUnaccepted(charo)\nQuotidian(charo)\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Pleading(x) -> Onomastic(x))\nBraised(jojo) and Unaccepted(jojo) -> Warming(jojo)\nforall x (Pleading(x) -> Vacuous(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Pleading(x) -> Quotidian(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) and Vacuous(x) -> Unaccepted(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> Pleading(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) and Vacuous(x) -> Braised(x))\nforall x (Onomastic(x) -> Pleading(x))\n\nPleading(charo)\n\nQuotidian(charo) and forall x (Quotidian(x) -> Pleading(x)) -> therefore Pleading(charo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Odele is roughened. Odele is boneheaded. Odele is algophobic. Odele is erogenous. Odele is nipponese. Odele is tacit. Odele is beady. Agace is roughened. Agace is boneheaded. Agace is erogenous. Kind, beady people are nipponese. If Odele is roughened and Odele is boneheaded then Odele is tacit. White people are algophobic. If someone is algophobic and beady then they are erogenous. If someone is erogenous and algophobic then they are boneheaded. Nice people are beady. If someone is tacit and algophobic then they are roughened. All nipponese people are beady. Agace is not beady.", "logic": "\nRoughened(odele)\nBoneheaded(odele)\nAlgophobic(odele)\nErogenous(odele)\nNipponese(odele)\nTacit(odele)\nBeady(odele)\nRoughened(agace)\nBoneheaded(agace)\nErogenous(agace)\nforall x (Algophobic(x) and Beady(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nRoughened(odele) and Boneheaded(odele) -> Tacit(odele)\nforall x (Beady(x) -> Algophobic(x))\nforall x (Algophobic(x) and Beady(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) and Algophobic(x) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Tacit(x) and Algophobic(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Nipponese(x) -> Beady(x))\n\nnot Beady(agace)\n\nErogenous(agace) and forall x (Erogenous(x) -> Beady(x)) -> therefore Beady(agace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Kassie is pushful. Kassie is embonpoint. Kassie is taboo. Kassie is satisfied. Kassie is eighth. Kassie is desiccated. Kassie is torrid. Alastair is pushful. Alastair is embonpoint. Alastair is satisfied. Kind, torrid people are eighth. If Kassie is pushful and Kassie is embonpoint then Kassie is desiccated. White people are taboo. If someone is taboo and torrid then they are satisfied. If someone is satisfied and taboo then they are embonpoint. Nice people are torrid. If someone is desiccated and taboo then they are pushful. All eighth people are torrid. Alastair is taboo.", "logic": "\nPushful(kassie)\nEmbonpoint(kassie)\nTaboo(kassie)\nSatisfied(kassie)\nEighth(kassie)\nDesiccated(kassie)\nTorrid(kassie)\nPushful(alastair)\nEmbonpoint(alastair)\nSatisfied(alastair)\nforall x (Taboo(x) and Torrid(x) -> Eighth(x))\nPushful(kassie) and Embonpoint(kassie) -> Desiccated(kassie)\nforall x (Torrid(x) -> Taboo(x))\nforall x (Taboo(x) and Torrid(x) -> Satisfied(x))\nforall x (Satisfied(x) and Taboo(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Satisfied(x) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and Taboo(x) -> Pushful(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) -> Torrid(x))\n\nTaboo(alastair)\n\nSatisfied(alastair) and forall x (Satisfied(x) -> Torrid(x)) -> therefore Torrid(alastair) Torrid(alastair) and forall x (Torrid(x) -> Taboo(x)) -> therefore Taboo(alastair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Robina is septic. Robina is starboard. Robina is sisyphean. Robina is pensive. Robina is gritty. Robina is sleek. Robina is aqueous. Natasha is septic. Natasha is starboard. Natasha is pensive. Kind, aqueous people are gritty. If Robina is septic and Robina is starboard then Robina is sleek. White people are sisyphean. If someone is sisyphean and aqueous then they are pensive. If someone is pensive and sisyphean then they are starboard. Nice people are aqueous. If someone is sleek and sisyphean then they are septic. All gritty people are aqueous. Natasha is not sisyphean.", "logic": "\nSeptic(robina)\nStarboard(robina)\nSisyphean(robina)\nPensive(robina)\nGritty(robina)\nSleek(robina)\nAqueous(robina)\nSeptic(natasha)\nStarboard(natasha)\nPensive(natasha)\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Aqueous(x) -> Gritty(x))\nSeptic(robina) and Starboard(robina) -> Sleek(robina)\nforall x (Aqueous(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Aqueous(x) -> Pensive(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Sisyphean(x) -> Starboard(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) -> Aqueous(x))\nforall x (Sleek(x) and Sisyphean(x) -> Septic(x))\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Aqueous(x))\n\nnot Sisyphean(natasha)\n\nPensive(natasha) and forall x (Pensive(x) -> Aqueous(x)) -> therefore Aqueous(natasha) Aqueous(natasha) and forall x (Aqueous(x) -> Sisyphean(x)) -> therefore Sisyphean(natasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Candis is mealy. Candis is tough. Candis is humic. Candis is apsidal. Candis is fucking. Candis is vicious. Candis is rainproof. Judie is mealy. Judie is tough. Judie is apsidal. Kind, rainproof people are fucking. If Candis is mealy and Candis is tough then Candis is vicious. White people are humic. If someone is humic and rainproof then they are apsidal. If someone is apsidal and humic then they are tough. Nice people are rainproof. If someone is vicious and humic then they are mealy. All fucking people are rainproof. Judie is fucking.", "logic": "\nMealy(candis)\nTough(candis)\nHumic(candis)\nApsidal(candis)\nFucking(candis)\nVicious(candis)\nRainproof(candis)\nMealy(judie)\nTough(judie)\nApsidal(judie)\nforall x (Humic(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Fucking(x))\nMealy(candis) and Tough(candis) -> Vicious(candis)\nforall x (Rainproof(x) -> Humic(x))\nforall x (Humic(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and Humic(x) -> Tough(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) -> Rainproof(x))\nforall x (Vicious(x) and Humic(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Fucking(x) -> Rainproof(x))\n\nFucking(judie)\n\nApsidal(judie) and forall x (Apsidal(x) -> Rainproof(x)) -> therefore Rainproof(judie) Rainproof(judie) and forall x (Rainproof(x) -> Humic(x)) -> therefore Humic(judie) Apsidal(judie) and forall x (Apsidal(x) -> Rainproof(x)) -> therefore Rainproof(judie) Humic(judie) and Rainproof(judie) and forall x (Humic(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Fucking(x)) -> therefore Fucking(judie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Kiersten is spiritous. Kiersten is buttony. Kiersten is epidermic. Kiersten is fractious. Kiersten is albuminous. Kiersten is given. Kiersten is rotational. Cristy is spiritous. Cristy is buttony. Cristy is fractious. Kind, rotational people are albuminous. If Kiersten is spiritous and Kiersten is buttony then Kiersten is given. White people are epidermic. If someone is epidermic and rotational then they are fractious. If someone is fractious and epidermic then they are buttony. Nice people are rotational. If someone is given and epidermic then they are spiritous. All albuminous people are rotational. Cristy is not albuminous.", "logic": "\nSpiritous(kiersten)\nButtony(kiersten)\nEpidermic(kiersten)\nFractious(kiersten)\nAlbuminous(kiersten)\nGiven(kiersten)\nRotational(kiersten)\nSpiritous(cristy)\nButtony(cristy)\nFractious(cristy)\nforall x (Epidermic(x) and Rotational(x) -> Albuminous(x))\nSpiritous(kiersten) and Buttony(kiersten) -> Given(kiersten)\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> Epidermic(x))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) and Rotational(x) -> Fractious(x))\nforall x (Fractious(x) and Epidermic(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Fractious(x) -> Rotational(x))\nforall x (Given(x) and Epidermic(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) -> Rotational(x))\n\nnot Albuminous(cristy)\n\nFractious(cristy) and forall x (Fractious(x) -> Rotational(x)) -> therefore Rotational(cristy) Rotational(cristy) and forall x (Rotational(x) -> Epidermic(x)) -> therefore Epidermic(cristy) Fractious(cristy) and forall x (Fractious(x) -> Rotational(x)) -> therefore Rotational(cristy) Epidermic(cristy) and Rotational(cristy) and forall x (Epidermic(x) and Rotational(x) -> Albuminous(x)) -> therefore Albuminous(cristy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "The tye boogie the erhart. The tuckie jail the erhart. The erhart is edible. The mikel is lxxviii. If something boogie the tye and it dispossess the mikel then the mikel dispossess the erhart. If something is edible then it boogie the tuckie. If something boogie the tuckie then the tuckie jail the tye. If the tuckie jail the erhart then the tuckie is vinous. If something dispossess the mikel and the mikel boogie the tuckie then the tuckie boogie the mikel. If something jail the erhart and it jail the tye then the tye boogie the mikel. The erhart is edible.", "logic": "\nBoogie(tye, erhart)\nJail(tuckie, erhart)\nEdible(erhart)\nLxxviii(mikel)\nforall x (Boogie(x, tye) and Dispossess(x, mikel) -> Dispossess(mikel, erhart))\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Boogie(x, tuckie))\nforall x (Boogie(x, tuckie) -> Jail(tuckie, tye))\nJail(tuckie, erhart) -> Vinous(tuckie)\nforall x (Dispossess(x, mikel) and Boogie(mikel, tuckie) -> Boogie(tuckie, mikel))\nforall x (Jail(x, erhart) and Jail(x, tye) -> Boogie(tye, mikel))\n\nEdible(erhart)\n\ntherefore Edible(erhart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The rivy charm the harriette. The joshua thank the harriette. The harriette is overaged. The coriss is damaged. If something charm the rivy and it telecast the coriss then the coriss telecast the harriette. If something is overaged then it charm the joshua. If something charm the joshua then the joshua thank the rivy. If the joshua thank the harriette then the joshua is damask. If something telecast the coriss and the coriss charm the joshua then the joshua charm the coriss. If something thank the harriette and it thank the rivy then the rivy charm the coriss. The harriette is not overaged.", "logic": "\nCharm(rivy, harriette)\nThank(joshua, harriette)\nOveraged(harriette)\nDamaged(coriss)\nforall x (Charm(x, rivy) and Telecast(x, coriss) -> Telecast(coriss, harriette))\nforall x (Overaged(x) -> Charm(x, joshua))\nforall x (Charm(x, joshua) -> Thank(joshua, rivy))\nThank(joshua, harriette) -> Damask(joshua)\nforall x (Telecast(x, coriss) and Charm(coriss, joshua) -> Charm(joshua, coriss))\nforall x (Thank(x, harriette) and Thank(x, rivy) -> Charm(rivy, coriss))\n\nnot Overaged(harriette)\n\ntherefore Overaged(harriette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The wendell wrack the barrie. The juliana vitriol the barrie. The barrie is mutagenic. The kim is ferny. If something wrack the wendell and it normalize the kim then the kim normalize the barrie. If something is mutagenic then it wrack the juliana. If something wrack the juliana then the juliana vitriol the wendell. If the juliana vitriol the barrie then the juliana is xlvii. If something normalize the kim and the kim wrack the juliana then the juliana wrack the kim. If something vitriol the barrie and it vitriol the wendell then the wendell wrack the kim. The barrie wrack the juliana.", "logic": "\nWrack(wendell, barrie)\nVitriol(juliana, barrie)\nMutagenic(barrie)\nFerny(kim)\nforall x (Wrack(x, wendell) and Normalize(x, kim) -> Normalize(kim, barrie))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Wrack(x, juliana))\nforall x (Wrack(x, juliana) -> Vitriol(juliana, wendell))\nVitriol(juliana, barrie) -> Xlvii(juliana)\nforall x (Normalize(x, kim) and Wrack(kim, juliana) -> Wrack(juliana, kim))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, barrie) and Vitriol(x, wendell) -> Wrack(wendell, kim))\n\nWrack(barrie, juliana)\n\nMutagenic(barrie) and forall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Wrack(x, juliana)) -> therefore Wrack(barrie, juliana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The brana aerosolise the etienne. The dom smoke the etienne. The etienne is appetising. The floris is ideational. If something aerosolise the brana and it ascribe the floris then the floris ascribe the etienne. If something is appetising then it aerosolise the dom. If something aerosolise the dom then the dom smoke the brana. If the dom smoke the etienne then the dom is radial. If something ascribe the floris and the floris aerosolise the dom then the dom aerosolise the floris. If something smoke the etienne and it smoke the brana then the brana aerosolise the floris. The etienne does not see the dom.", "logic": "\nAerosolise(brana, etienne)\nSmoke(dom, etienne)\nAppetising(etienne)\nIdeational(floris)\nforall x (Aerosolise(x, brana) and Ascribe(x, floris) -> Ascribe(floris, etienne))\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Aerosolise(x, dom))\nforall x (Aerosolise(x, dom) -> Smoke(dom, brana))\nSmoke(dom, etienne) -> Radial(dom)\nforall x (Ascribe(x, floris) and Aerosolise(floris, dom) -> Aerosolise(dom, floris))\nforall x (Smoke(x, etienne) and Smoke(x, brana) -> Aerosolise(brana, floris))\n\nnot Aerosolise(etienne, dom)\n\nAppetising(etienne) and forall x (Appetising(x) -> Aerosolise(x, dom)) -> therefore Aerosolise(etienne, dom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The althea dock the jarvis. The emmaline bode the jarvis. The jarvis is ungentle. The rhea is wandering. If something dock the althea and it command the rhea then the rhea command the jarvis. If something is ungentle then it dock the emmaline. If something dock the emmaline then the emmaline bode the althea. If the emmaline bode the jarvis then the emmaline is fussy. If something command the rhea and the rhea dock the emmaline then the emmaline dock the rhea. If something bode the jarvis and it bode the althea then the althea dock the rhea. The emmaline bode the althea.", "logic": "\nDock(althea, jarvis)\nBode(emmaline, jarvis)\nUngentle(jarvis)\nWandering(rhea)\nforall x (Dock(x, althea) and Command(x, rhea) -> Command(rhea, jarvis))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) -> Dock(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Dock(x, emmaline) -> Bode(emmaline, althea))\nBode(emmaline, jarvis) -> Fussy(emmaline)\nforall x (Command(x, rhea) and Dock(rhea, emmaline) -> Dock(emmaline, rhea))\nforall x (Bode(x, jarvis) and Bode(x, althea) -> Dock(althea, rhea))\n\nBode(emmaline, althea)\n\nUngentle(jarvis) and forall x (Ungentle(x) -> Dock(x, emmaline)) -> therefore Dock(jarvis, emmaline) Dock(jarvis, emmaline) and forall x (Dock(x, emmaline) -> Bode(emmaline, althea)) -> therefore Bode(emmaline, althea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The kacey overlie the elsi. The lilian fort the elsi. The elsi is vile. The dani is made. If something overlie the kacey and it coexist the dani then the dani coexist the elsi. If something is vile then it overlie the lilian. If something overlie the lilian then the lilian fort the kacey. If the lilian fort the elsi then the lilian is incipient. If something coexist the dani and the dani overlie the lilian then the lilian overlie the dani. If something fort the elsi and it fort the kacey then the kacey overlie the dani. The lilian does not visit the kacey.", "logic": "\nOverlie(kacey, elsi)\nFort(lilian, elsi)\nVile(elsi)\nMade(dani)\nforall x (Overlie(x, kacey) and Coexist(x, dani) -> Coexist(dani, elsi))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Overlie(x, lilian))\nforall x (Overlie(x, lilian) -> Fort(lilian, kacey))\nFort(lilian, elsi) -> Incipient(lilian)\nforall x (Coexist(x, dani) and Overlie(dani, lilian) -> Overlie(lilian, dani))\nforall x (Fort(x, elsi) and Fort(x, kacey) -> Overlie(kacey, dani))\n\nnot Fort(lilian, kacey)\n\nVile(elsi) and forall x (Vile(x) -> Overlie(x, lilian)) -> therefore Overlie(elsi, lilian) Overlie(elsi, lilian) and forall x (Overlie(x, lilian) -> Fort(lilian, kacey)) -> therefore Fort(lilian, kacey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The garth undersign the haywood. The sayers reproduce the haywood. The haywood is conveyable. The felicia is exonerated. If something undersign the garth and it dishonor the felicia then the felicia dishonor the haywood. If something is conveyable then it undersign the sayers. If something undersign the sayers then the sayers reproduce the garth. If the sayers reproduce the haywood then the sayers is coriaceous. If something dishonor the felicia and the felicia undersign the sayers then the sayers undersign the felicia. If something reproduce the haywood and it reproduce the garth then the garth undersign the felicia. The garth undersign the felicia.", "logic": "\nUndersign(garth, haywood)\nReproduce(sayers, haywood)\nConveyable(haywood)\nExonerated(felicia)\nforall x (Undersign(x, garth) and Dishonor(x, felicia) -> Dishonor(felicia, haywood))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Undersign(x, sayers))\nforall x (Undersign(x, sayers) -> Reproduce(sayers, garth))\nReproduce(sayers, haywood) -> Coriaceous(sayers)\nforall x (Dishonor(x, felicia) and Undersign(felicia, sayers) -> Undersign(sayers, felicia))\nforall x (Reproduce(x, haywood) and Reproduce(x, garth) -> Undersign(garth, felicia))\n\nUndersign(garth, felicia)\n\nConveyable(haywood) and forall x (Conveyable(x) -> Undersign(x, sayers)) -> therefore Undersign(haywood, sayers) Undersign(haywood, sayers) and forall x (Undersign(x, sayers) -> Reproduce(sayers, garth)) -> therefore Reproduce(sayers, garth) Reproduce(sayers, haywood) and Reproduce(sayers, garth) and forall x (Reproduce(x, haywood) and Reproduce(x, garth) -> Undersign(garth, felicia)) -> therefore Undersign(garth, felicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The florida causeway the rebeka. The jenny blast the rebeka. The rebeka is utile. The meghan is satiny. If something causeway the florida and it merit the meghan then the meghan merit the rebeka. If something is utile then it causeway the jenny. If something causeway the jenny then the jenny blast the florida. If the jenny blast the rebeka then the jenny is prescribed. If something merit the meghan and the meghan causeway the jenny then the jenny causeway the meghan. If something blast the rebeka and it blast the florida then the florida causeway the meghan. The florida does not see the meghan.", "logic": "\nCauseway(florida, rebeka)\nBlast(jenny, rebeka)\nUtile(rebeka)\nSatiny(meghan)\nforall x (Causeway(x, florida) and Merit(x, meghan) -> Merit(meghan, rebeka))\nforall x (Utile(x) -> Causeway(x, jenny))\nforall x (Causeway(x, jenny) -> Blast(jenny, florida))\nBlast(jenny, rebeka) -> Prescribed(jenny)\nforall x (Merit(x, meghan) and Causeway(meghan, jenny) -> Causeway(jenny, meghan))\nforall x (Blast(x, rebeka) and Blast(x, florida) -> Causeway(florida, meghan))\n\nnot Causeway(florida, meghan)\n\nUtile(rebeka) and forall x (Utile(x) -> Causeway(x, jenny)) -> therefore Causeway(rebeka, jenny) Causeway(rebeka, jenny) and forall x (Causeway(x, jenny) -> Blast(jenny, florida)) -> therefore Blast(jenny, florida) Blast(jenny, rebeka) and Blast(jenny, florida) and forall x (Blast(x, rebeka) and Blast(x, florida) -> Causeway(florida, meghan)) -> therefore Causeway(florida, meghan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The sue enervate the tom. The lebbie reference the tom. The tom is unstrained. The koralle is celestial. If something enervate the sue and it detoxicate the koralle then the koralle detoxicate the tom. If something is unstrained then it enervate the lebbie. If something enervate the lebbie then the lebbie reference the sue. If the lebbie reference the tom then the lebbie is bulging. If something detoxicate the koralle and the koralle enervate the lebbie then the lebbie enervate the koralle. If something reference the tom and it reference the sue then the sue enervate the koralle. The koralle does not need the tom.", "logic": "\nEnervate(sue, tom)\nReference(lebbie, tom)\nUnstrained(tom)\nCelestial(koralle)\nforall x (Enervate(x, sue) and Detoxicate(x, koralle) -> Detoxicate(koralle, tom))\nforall x (Unstrained(x) -> Enervate(x, lebbie))\nforall x (Enervate(x, lebbie) -> Reference(lebbie, sue))\nReference(lebbie, tom) -> Bulging(lebbie)\nforall x (Detoxicate(x, koralle) and Enervate(koralle, lebbie) -> Enervate(lebbie, koralle))\nforall x (Reference(x, tom) and Reference(x, sue) -> Enervate(sue, koralle))\n\nnot Detoxicate(koralle, tom)\n\nforall x (Enervate(x, sue) and Detoxicate(x, koralle) -> Detoxicate(koralle, tom)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The emogene solo the piet. The emilio enlarge the piet. The piet is tabu. The peter is encyclical. If something solo the emogene and it mistrust the peter then the peter mistrust the piet. If something is tabu then it solo the emilio. If something solo the emilio then the emilio enlarge the emogene. If the emilio enlarge the piet then the emilio is bardic. If something mistrust the peter and the peter solo the emilio then the emilio solo the peter. If something enlarge the piet and it enlarge the emogene then the emogene solo the peter. The emilio solo the emilio.", "logic": "\nSolo(emogene, piet)\nEnlarge(emilio, piet)\nTabu(piet)\nEncyclical(peter)\nforall x (Solo(x, emogene) and Mistrust(x, peter) -> Mistrust(peter, piet))\nforall x (Tabu(x) -> Solo(x, emilio))\nforall x (Solo(x, emilio) -> Enlarge(emilio, emogene))\nEnlarge(emilio, piet) -> Bardic(emilio)\nforall x (Mistrust(x, peter) and Solo(peter, emilio) -> Solo(emilio, peter))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, piet) and Enlarge(x, emogene) -> Solo(emogene, peter))\n\nSolo(emilio, emilio)\n\nforall x (Tabu(x) -> Solo(x, emilio)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The donnajean pyramid the pet. The dodie compere the pet. The pet is triclinic. The laurance is airy. If something pyramid the donnajean and it altercate the laurance then the laurance altercate the pet. If something is triclinic then it pyramid the dodie. If something pyramid the dodie then the dodie compere the donnajean. If the dodie compere the pet then the dodie is twentieth. If something altercate the laurance and the laurance pyramid the dodie then the dodie pyramid the laurance. If something compere the pet and it compere the donnajean then the donnajean pyramid the laurance. The laurance does not see the dodie.", "logic": "\nPyramid(donnajean, pet)\nCompere(dodie, pet)\nTriclinic(pet)\nAiry(laurance)\nforall x (Pyramid(x, donnajean) and Altercate(x, laurance) -> Altercate(laurance, pet))\nforall x (Triclinic(x) -> Pyramid(x, dodie))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, dodie) -> Compere(dodie, donnajean))\nCompere(dodie, pet) -> Twentieth(dodie)\nforall x (Altercate(x, laurance) and Pyramid(laurance, dodie) -> Pyramid(dodie, laurance))\nforall x (Compere(x, pet) and Compere(x, donnajean) -> Pyramid(donnajean, laurance))\n\nnot Pyramid(laurance, dodie)\n\nforall x (Triclinic(x) -> Pyramid(x, dodie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The valentina detect the gabriell. The leila commove the gabriell. The gabriell is pistillate. The pippy is minimalist. If something detect the valentina and it trace the pippy then the pippy trace the gabriell. If something is pistillate then it detect the leila. If something detect the leila then the leila commove the valentina. If the leila commove the gabriell then the leila is yogistic. If something trace the pippy and the pippy detect the leila then the leila detect the pippy. If something commove the gabriell and it commove the valentina then the valentina detect the pippy. The valentina detect the leila.", "logic": "\nDetect(valentina, gabriell)\nCommove(leila, gabriell)\nPistillate(gabriell)\nMinimalist(pippy)\nforall x (Detect(x, valentina) and Trace(x, pippy) -> Trace(pippy, gabriell))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) -> Detect(x, leila))\nforall x (Detect(x, leila) -> Commove(leila, valentina))\nCommove(leila, gabriell) -> Yogistic(leila)\nforall x (Trace(x, pippy) and Detect(pippy, leila) -> Detect(leila, pippy))\nforall x (Commove(x, gabriell) and Commove(x, valentina) -> Detect(valentina, pippy))\n\nDetect(valentina, leila)\n\nforall x (Pistillate(x) -> Detect(x, leila)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The nonie partition the francesca. The lucas unitise the francesca. The francesca is powdery. The patty is nonviable. If something partition the nonie and it addict the patty then the patty addict the francesca. If something is powdery then it partition the lucas. If something partition the lucas then the lucas unitise the nonie. If the lucas unitise the francesca then the lucas is myeloid. If something addict the patty and the patty partition the lucas then the lucas partition the patty. If something unitise the francesca and it unitise the nonie then the nonie partition the patty. The lucas is not powdery.", "logic": "\nPartition(nonie, francesca)\nUnitise(lucas, francesca)\nPowdery(francesca)\nNonviable(patty)\nforall x (Partition(x, nonie) and Addict(x, patty) -> Addict(patty, francesca))\nforall x (Powdery(x) -> Partition(x, lucas))\nforall x (Partition(x, lucas) -> Unitise(lucas, nonie))\nUnitise(lucas, francesca) -> Myeloid(lucas)\nforall x (Addict(x, patty) and Partition(patty, lucas) -> Partition(lucas, patty))\nforall x (Unitise(x, francesca) and Unitise(x, nonie) -> Partition(nonie, patty))\n\nnot Powdery(lucas)\n\nnot Powdery(lucas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The heinz crawfish the knox. The biff replay the knox. The knox is nonhairy. The morse is obliterate. If something crawfish the heinz and it cull the morse then the morse cull the knox. If something is nonhairy then it crawfish the biff. If something crawfish the biff then the biff replay the heinz. If the biff replay the knox then the biff is capacitive. If something cull the morse and the morse crawfish the biff then the biff crawfish the morse. If something replay the knox and it replay the heinz then the heinz crawfish the morse. The heinz replay the heinz.", "logic": "\nCrawfish(heinz, knox)\nReplay(biff, knox)\nNonhairy(knox)\nObliterate(morse)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, heinz) and Cull(x, morse) -> Cull(morse, knox))\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Crawfish(x, biff))\nforall x (Crawfish(x, biff) -> Replay(biff, heinz))\nReplay(biff, knox) -> Capacitive(biff)\nforall x (Cull(x, morse) and Crawfish(morse, biff) -> Crawfish(biff, morse))\nforall x (Replay(x, knox) and Replay(x, heinz) -> Crawfish(heinz, morse))\n\nReplay(heinz, heinz)\n\nReplay(heinz, heinz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The bethanne engorge the noach. The freda fret the noach. The noach is noetic. The theadora is sapphic. If something engorge the bethanne and it nutrify the theadora then the theadora nutrify the noach. If something is noetic then it engorge the freda. If something engorge the freda then the freda fret the bethanne. If the freda fret the noach then the freda is sunburnt. If something nutrify the theadora and the theadora engorge the freda then the freda engorge the theadora. If something fret the noach and it fret the bethanne then the bethanne engorge the theadora. The bethanne is not big.", "logic": "\nEngorge(bethanne, noach)\nFret(freda, noach)\nNoetic(noach)\nSapphic(theadora)\nforall x (Engorge(x, bethanne) and Nutrify(x, theadora) -> Nutrify(theadora, noach))\nforall x (Noetic(x) -> Engorge(x, freda))\nforall x (Engorge(x, freda) -> Fret(freda, bethanne))\nFret(freda, noach) -> Sunburnt(freda)\nforall x (Nutrify(x, theadora) and Engorge(theadora, freda) -> Engorge(freda, theadora))\nforall x (Fret(x, noach) and Fret(x, bethanne) -> Engorge(bethanne, theadora))\n\nnot Big(bethanne)\n\nnot Big(bethanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The fortune birdlime the gardiner. The sella connect the gardiner. The gardiner is shrubby. The tedrick is tahitian. If something birdlime the fortune and it intumesce the tedrick then the tedrick intumesce the gardiner. If something is shrubby then it birdlime the sella. If something birdlime the sella then the sella connect the fortune. If the sella connect the gardiner then the sella is amebous. If something intumesce the tedrick and the tedrick birdlime the sella then the sella birdlime the tedrick. If something connect the gardiner and it connect the fortune then the fortune birdlime the tedrick. The fortune intumesce the gardiner.", "logic": "\nBirdlime(fortune, gardiner)\nConnect(sella, gardiner)\nShrubby(gardiner)\nTahitian(tedrick)\nforall x (Birdlime(x, fortune) and Intumesce(x, tedrick) -> Intumesce(tedrick, gardiner))\nforall x (Shrubby(x) -> Birdlime(x, sella))\nforall x (Birdlime(x, sella) -> Connect(sella, fortune))\nConnect(sella, gardiner) -> Amebous(sella)\nforall x (Intumesce(x, tedrick) and Birdlime(tedrick, sella) -> Birdlime(sella, tedrick))\nforall x (Connect(x, gardiner) and Connect(x, fortune) -> Birdlime(fortune, tedrick))\n\nIntumesce(fortune, gardiner)\n\nIntumesce(fortune, gardiner) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "Barbi is mock. Barbi is implicated. Barbi is papillary. All sotho, mock people are undefeated. All mock people are upstart. If Barbi is sotho and Barbi is papillary then Barbi is undefeated. Kind, undefeated people are nominative. Smart people are sotho. If someone is implicated and sotho then they are papillary. If someone is undefeated and papillary then they are mock. Round people are sotho. Barbi is papillary.", "logic": "\nMock(barbi)\nImplicated(barbi)\nPapillary(barbi)\nforall x (Sotho(x) and Mock(x) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Mock(x) -> Upstart(x))\nSotho(barbi) and Papillary(barbi) -> Undefeated(barbi)\nforall x (Sotho(x) and Undefeated(x) -> Nominative(x))\nforall x (Upstart(x) -> Sotho(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Sotho(x) -> Papillary(x))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and Papillary(x) -> Mock(x))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) -> Sotho(x))\n\nPapillary(barbi)\n\ntherefore Papillary(barbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Matilde is gibbose. Matilde is accented. Matilde is epileptic. All crude, gibbose people are cased. All gibbose people are gentle. If Matilde is crude and Matilde is epileptic then Matilde is cased. Kind, cased people are grotty. Smart people are crude. If someone is accented and crude then they are epileptic. If someone is cased and epileptic then they are gibbose. Round people are crude. Matilde is not epileptic.", "logic": "\nGibbose(matilde)\nAccented(matilde)\nEpileptic(matilde)\nforall x (Crude(x) and Gibbose(x) -> Cased(x))\nforall x (Gibbose(x) -> Gentle(x))\nCrude(matilde) and Epileptic(matilde) -> Cased(matilde)\nforall x (Crude(x) and Cased(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Gentle(x) -> Crude(x))\nforall x (Accented(x) and Crude(x) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Cased(x) and Epileptic(x) -> Gibbose(x))\nforall x (Cased(x) -> Crude(x))\n\nnot Epileptic(matilde)\n\ntherefore Epileptic(matilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Quigly is recherche. Quigly is masonic. Quigly is algebraic. All binocular, recherche people are elicited. All recherche people are meatless. If Quigly is binocular and Quigly is algebraic then Quigly is elicited. Kind, elicited people are hircine. Smart people are binocular. If someone is masonic and binocular then they are algebraic. If someone is elicited and algebraic then they are recherche. Round people are binocular. Quigly is meatless.", "logic": "\nRecherche(quigly)\nMasonic(quigly)\nAlgebraic(quigly)\nforall x (Binocular(x) and Recherche(x) -> Elicited(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Meatless(x))\nBinocular(quigly) and Algebraic(quigly) -> Elicited(quigly)\nforall x (Binocular(x) and Elicited(x) -> Hircine(x))\nforall x (Meatless(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Masonic(x) and Binocular(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nforall x (Elicited(x) and Algebraic(x) -> Recherche(x))\nforall x (Elicited(x) -> Binocular(x))\n\nMeatless(quigly)\n\nRecherche(quigly) and forall x (Recherche(x) -> Meatless(x)) -> therefore Meatless(quigly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Tamra is veracious. Tamra is insecure. Tamra is dazzled. All cuban, veracious people are selfish. All veracious people are winning. If Tamra is cuban and Tamra is dazzled then Tamra is selfish. Kind, selfish people are apelike. Smart people are cuban. If someone is insecure and cuban then they are dazzled. If someone is selfish and dazzled then they are veracious. Round people are cuban. Tamra is not winning.", "logic": "\nVeracious(tamra)\nInsecure(tamra)\nDazzled(tamra)\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Veracious(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Veracious(x) -> Winning(x))\nCuban(tamra) and Dazzled(tamra) -> Selfish(tamra)\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Selfish(x) -> Apelike(x))\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Cuban(x))\nforall x (Insecure(x) and Cuban(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nforall x (Selfish(x) and Dazzled(x) -> Veracious(x))\nforall x (Selfish(x) -> Cuban(x))\n\nnot Winning(tamra)\n\nVeracious(tamra) and forall x (Veracious(x) -> Winning(x)) -> therefore Winning(tamra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Vinita is developing. Vinita is amphibious. Vinita is kinky. All unfeasible, developing people are panicked. All developing people are lissom. If Vinita is unfeasible and Vinita is kinky then Vinita is panicked. Kind, panicked people are factious. Smart people are unfeasible. If someone is amphibious and unfeasible then they are kinky. If someone is panicked and kinky then they are developing. Round people are unfeasible. Vinita is unfeasible.", "logic": "\nDeveloping(vinita)\nAmphibious(vinita)\nKinky(vinita)\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) and Developing(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Developing(x) -> Lissom(x))\nUnfeasible(vinita) and Kinky(vinita) -> Panicked(vinita)\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) and Panicked(x) -> Factious(x))\nforall x (Lissom(x) -> Unfeasible(x))\nforall x (Amphibious(x) and Unfeasible(x) -> Kinky(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) and Kinky(x) -> Developing(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Unfeasible(x))\n\nUnfeasible(vinita)\n\nDeveloping(vinita) and forall x (Developing(x) -> Lissom(x)) -> therefore Lissom(vinita) Lissom(vinita) and forall x (Lissom(x) -> Unfeasible(x)) -> therefore Unfeasible(vinita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Zacherie is guttural. Zacherie is rhombic. Zacherie is edental. All glad, guttural people are unclaimed. All guttural people are bushed. If Zacherie is glad and Zacherie is edental then Zacherie is unclaimed. Kind, unclaimed people are tiptop. Smart people are glad. If someone is rhombic and glad then they are edental. If someone is unclaimed and edental then they are guttural. Round people are glad. Zacherie is not glad.", "logic": "\nGuttural(zacherie)\nRhombic(zacherie)\nEdental(zacherie)\nforall x (Glad(x) and Guttural(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Guttural(x) -> Bushed(x))\nGlad(zacherie) and Edental(zacherie) -> Unclaimed(zacherie)\nforall x (Glad(x) and Unclaimed(x) -> Tiptop(x))\nforall x (Bushed(x) -> Glad(x))\nforall x (Rhombic(x) and Glad(x) -> Edental(x))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) and Edental(x) -> Guttural(x))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Glad(x))\n\nnot Glad(zacherie)\n\nGuttural(zacherie) and forall x (Guttural(x) -> Bushed(x)) -> therefore Bushed(zacherie) Bushed(zacherie) and forall x (Bushed(x) -> Glad(x)) -> therefore Glad(zacherie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Liam is stoneless. Liam is nocent. Liam is saintlike. All undaunted, stoneless people are ammoniated. All stoneless people are slavic. If Liam is undaunted and Liam is saintlike then Liam is ammoniated. Kind, ammoniated people are cloying. Smart people are undaunted. If someone is nocent and undaunted then they are saintlike. If someone is ammoniated and saintlike then they are stoneless. Round people are undaunted. Liam is ammoniated.", "logic": "\nStoneless(liam)\nNocent(liam)\nSaintlike(liam)\nforall x (Undaunted(x) and Stoneless(x) -> Ammoniated(x))\nforall x (Stoneless(x) -> Slavic(x))\nUndaunted(liam) and Saintlike(liam) -> Ammoniated(liam)\nforall x (Undaunted(x) and Ammoniated(x) -> Cloying(x))\nforall x (Slavic(x) -> Undaunted(x))\nforall x (Nocent(x) and Undaunted(x) -> Saintlike(x))\nforall x (Ammoniated(x) and Saintlike(x) -> Stoneless(x))\nforall x (Ammoniated(x) -> Undaunted(x))\n\nAmmoniated(liam)\n\nStoneless(liam) and forall x (Stoneless(x) -> Slavic(x)) -> therefore Slavic(liam) Slavic(liam) and forall x (Slavic(x) -> Undaunted(x)) -> therefore Undaunted(liam) Undaunted(liam) and Stoneless(liam) and forall x (Undaunted(x) and Stoneless(x) -> Ammoniated(x)) -> therefore Ammoniated(liam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Lavina is venous. Lavina is doped. Lavina is improvable. All present, venous people are optative. All venous people are ptolemaic. If Lavina is present and Lavina is improvable then Lavina is optative. Kind, optative people are unrested. Smart people are present. If someone is doped and present then they are improvable. If someone is optative and improvable then they are venous. Round people are present. Lavina is not optative.", "logic": "\nVenous(lavina)\nDoped(lavina)\nImprovable(lavina)\nforall x (Present(x) and Venous(x) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Venous(x) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nPresent(lavina) and Improvable(lavina) -> Optative(lavina)\nforall x (Present(x) and Optative(x) -> Unrested(x))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Present(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) and Present(x) -> Improvable(x))\nforall x (Optative(x) and Improvable(x) -> Venous(x))\nforall x (Optative(x) -> Present(x))\n\nnot Optative(lavina)\n\nVenous(lavina) and forall x (Venous(x) -> Ptolemaic(x)) -> therefore Ptolemaic(lavina) Ptolemaic(lavina) and forall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Present(x)) -> therefore Present(lavina) Present(lavina) and Venous(lavina) and forall x (Present(x) and Venous(x) -> Optative(x)) -> therefore Optative(lavina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Sollie is ingenuous. Sollie is lancelike. Sollie is immunised. Sollie is worshipped. Sollie is confident. Sollie is outspoken. Catriona is ingenuous. Catriona is lancelike. Catriona is immunised. Catriona is outspoken. Dorris is deadened. Dorris is worshipped. Dorris is outspoken. Mayer is deadened. Mayer is confident. If someone is lancelike then they are worshipped. All worshipped, confident people are outspoken. All lancelike people are deadened. If someone is deadened then they are confident. All worshipped, immunised people are lancelike. Rough, worshipped people are immunised. Catriona is ingenuous.", "logic": "\nIngenuous(sollie)\nLancelike(sollie)\nImmunised(sollie)\nWorshipped(sollie)\nConfident(sollie)\nOutspoken(sollie)\nIngenuous(catriona)\nLancelike(catriona)\nImmunised(catriona)\nOutspoken(catriona)\nDeadened(dorris)\nWorshipped(dorris)\nOutspoken(dorris)\nDeadened(mayer)\nConfident(mayer)\nforall x (Lancelike(x) -> Worshipped(x))\nforall x (Worshipped(x) and Confident(x) -> Outspoken(x))\nforall x (Lancelike(x) -> Deadened(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) -> Confident(x))\nforall x (Worshipped(x) and Immunised(x) -> Lancelike(x))\nforall x (Confident(x) and Worshipped(x) -> Immunised(x))\n\nIngenuous(catriona)\n\ntherefore Ingenuous(catriona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Vassili is analeptic. Vassili is enthralled. Vassili is soggy. Vassili is ignited. Vassili is bounden. Vassili is tonsured. Phaidra is analeptic. Phaidra is enthralled. Phaidra is soggy. Phaidra is tonsured. Hamlin is noachian. Hamlin is ignited. Hamlin is tonsured. Cordelie is noachian. Cordelie is bounden. If someone is enthralled then they are ignited. All ignited, bounden people are tonsured. All enthralled people are noachian. If someone is noachian then they are bounden. All ignited, soggy people are enthralled. Rough, ignited people are soggy. Vassili is not ignited.", "logic": "\nAnaleptic(vassili)\nEnthralled(vassili)\nSoggy(vassili)\nIgnited(vassili)\nBounden(vassili)\nTonsured(vassili)\nAnaleptic(phaidra)\nEnthralled(phaidra)\nSoggy(phaidra)\nTonsured(phaidra)\nNoachian(hamlin)\nIgnited(hamlin)\nTonsured(hamlin)\nNoachian(cordelie)\nBounden(cordelie)\nforall x (Enthralled(x) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) and Bounden(x) -> Tonsured(x))\nforall x (Enthralled(x) -> Noachian(x))\nforall x (Noachian(x) -> Bounden(x))\nforall x (Ignited(x) and Soggy(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Bounden(x) and Ignited(x) -> Soggy(x))\n\nnot Ignited(vassili)\n\ntherefore Ignited(vassili)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Winni is paintable. Winni is rayless. Winni is reclaimed. Winni is cycloid. Winni is robed. Winni is unseeyn. Weber is paintable. Weber is rayless. Weber is reclaimed. Weber is unseeyn. Elton is lidless. Elton is cycloid. Elton is unseeyn. Gibb is lidless. Gibb is robed. If someone is rayless then they are cycloid. All cycloid, robed people are unseeyn. All rayless people are lidless. If someone is lidless then they are robed. All cycloid, reclaimed people are rayless. Rough, cycloid people are reclaimed. Elton is robed.", "logic": "\nPaintable(winni)\nRayless(winni)\nReclaimed(winni)\nCycloid(winni)\nRobed(winni)\nUnseeyn(winni)\nPaintable(weber)\nRayless(weber)\nReclaimed(weber)\nUnseeyn(weber)\nLidless(elton)\nCycloid(elton)\nUnseeyn(elton)\nLidless(gibb)\nRobed(gibb)\nforall x (Rayless(x) -> Cycloid(x))\nforall x (Cycloid(x) and Robed(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Rayless(x) -> Lidless(x))\nforall x (Lidless(x) -> Robed(x))\nforall x (Cycloid(x) and Reclaimed(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Robed(x) and Cycloid(x) -> Reclaimed(x))\n\nRobed(elton)\n\nLidless(elton) and forall x (Lidless(x) -> Robed(x)) -> therefore Robed(elton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Raymund is insurable. Raymund is thwartwise. Raymund is cloze. Raymund is capital. Raymund is veinal. Raymund is various. Corrianne is insurable. Corrianne is thwartwise. Corrianne is cloze. Corrianne is various. Elfie is encysted. Elfie is capital. Elfie is various. Cissy is encysted. Cissy is veinal. If someone is thwartwise then they are capital. All capital, veinal people are various. All thwartwise people are encysted. If someone is encysted then they are veinal. All capital, cloze people are thwartwise. Rough, capital people are cloze. Corrianne is not capital.", "logic": "\nInsurable(raymund)\nThwartwise(raymund)\nCloze(raymund)\nCapital(raymund)\nVeinal(raymund)\nVarious(raymund)\nInsurable(corrianne)\nThwartwise(corrianne)\nCloze(corrianne)\nVarious(corrianne)\nEncysted(elfie)\nCapital(elfie)\nVarious(elfie)\nEncysted(cissy)\nVeinal(cissy)\nforall x (Thwartwise(x) -> Capital(x))\nforall x (Capital(x) and Veinal(x) -> Various(x))\nforall x (Thwartwise(x) -> Encysted(x))\nforall x (Encysted(x) -> Veinal(x))\nforall x (Capital(x) and Cloze(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Veinal(x) and Capital(x) -> Cloze(x))\n\nnot Capital(corrianne)\n\nThwartwise(corrianne) and forall x (Thwartwise(x) -> Capital(x)) -> therefore Capital(corrianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Gerrie is meritless. Gerrie is torulose. Gerrie is changed. Gerrie is damascene. Gerrie is smokeless. Gerrie is lean. Tremaine is meritless. Tremaine is torulose. Tremaine is changed. Tremaine is lean. Lorrie is bastioned. Lorrie is damascene. Lorrie is lean. Carmen is bastioned. Carmen is smokeless. If someone is torulose then they are damascene. All damascene, smokeless people are lean. All torulose people are bastioned. If someone is bastioned then they are smokeless. All damascene, changed people are torulose. Rough, damascene people are changed. Lorrie is changed.", "logic": "\nMeritless(gerrie)\nTorulose(gerrie)\nChanged(gerrie)\nDamascene(gerrie)\nSmokeless(gerrie)\nLean(gerrie)\nMeritless(tremaine)\nTorulose(tremaine)\nChanged(tremaine)\nLean(tremaine)\nBastioned(lorrie)\nDamascene(lorrie)\nLean(lorrie)\nBastioned(carmen)\nSmokeless(carmen)\nforall x (Torulose(x) -> Damascene(x))\nforall x (Damascene(x) and Smokeless(x) -> Lean(x))\nforall x (Torulose(x) -> Bastioned(x))\nforall x (Bastioned(x) -> Smokeless(x))\nforall x (Damascene(x) and Changed(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Smokeless(x) and Damascene(x) -> Changed(x))\n\nChanged(lorrie)\n\nBastioned(lorrie) and forall x (Bastioned(x) -> Smokeless(x)) -> therefore Smokeless(lorrie) Smokeless(lorrie) and Damascene(lorrie) and forall x (Smokeless(x) and Damascene(x) -> Changed(x)) -> therefore Changed(lorrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Karin is undulant. Karin is zymoid. Karin is animate. Karin is monotonous. Karin is buffeted. Karin is blockish. Adrien is undulant. Adrien is zymoid. Adrien is animate. Adrien is blockish. Reiko is tender. Reiko is monotonous. Reiko is blockish. Melody is tender. Melody is buffeted. If someone is zymoid then they are monotonous. All monotonous, buffeted people are blockish. All zymoid people are tender. If someone is tender then they are buffeted. All monotonous, animate people are zymoid. Rough, monotonous people are animate. Reiko is not animate.", "logic": "\nUndulant(karin)\nZymoid(karin)\nAnimate(karin)\nMonotonous(karin)\nBuffeted(karin)\nBlockish(karin)\nUndulant(adrien)\nZymoid(adrien)\nAnimate(adrien)\nBlockish(adrien)\nTender(reiko)\nMonotonous(reiko)\nBlockish(reiko)\nTender(melody)\nBuffeted(melody)\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Monotonous(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) and Buffeted(x) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Tender(x))\nforall x (Tender(x) -> Buffeted(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) and Animate(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Buffeted(x) and Monotonous(x) -> Animate(x))\n\nnot Animate(reiko)\n\nTender(reiko) and forall x (Tender(x) -> Buffeted(x)) -> therefore Buffeted(reiko) Buffeted(reiko) and Monotonous(reiko) and forall x (Buffeted(x) and Monotonous(x) -> Animate(x)) -> therefore Animate(reiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Rosina is impeccable. Rosina is fastened. Rosina is virulent. Rosina is catapultic. Rosina is foremost. Rosina is revised. Dimitry is impeccable. Dimitry is fastened. Dimitry is virulent. Dimitry is revised. Clareta is undoable. Clareta is catapultic. Clareta is revised. Randolph is undoable. Randolph is foremost. If someone is fastened then they are catapultic. All catapultic, foremost people are revised. All fastened people are undoable. If someone is undoable then they are foremost. All catapultic, virulent people are fastened. Rough, catapultic people are virulent. Clareta is fastened.", "logic": "\nImpeccable(rosina)\nFastened(rosina)\nVirulent(rosina)\nCatapultic(rosina)\nForemost(rosina)\nRevised(rosina)\nImpeccable(dimitry)\nFastened(dimitry)\nVirulent(dimitry)\nRevised(dimitry)\nUndoable(clareta)\nCatapultic(clareta)\nRevised(clareta)\nUndoable(randolph)\nForemost(randolph)\nforall x (Fastened(x) -> Catapultic(x))\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Foremost(x) -> Revised(x))\nforall x (Fastened(x) -> Undoable(x))\nforall x (Undoable(x) -> Foremost(x))\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Virulent(x) -> Fastened(x))\nforall x (Foremost(x) and Catapultic(x) -> Virulent(x))\n\nFastened(clareta)\n\nUndoable(clareta) and forall x (Undoable(x) -> Foremost(x)) -> therefore Foremost(clareta) Foremost(clareta) and Catapultic(clareta) and forall x (Foremost(x) and Catapultic(x) -> Virulent(x)) -> therefore Virulent(clareta) Catapultic(clareta) and Virulent(clareta) and forall x (Catapultic(x) and Virulent(x) -> Fastened(x)) -> therefore Fastened(clareta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Brent is dantean. Brent is acrogenous. Brent is woven. Brent is sensate. Brent is philatelic. Brent is manly. Carlena is dantean. Carlena is acrogenous. Carlena is woven. Carlena is manly. Clive is youngish. Clive is sensate. Clive is manly. Bernhard is youngish. Bernhard is philatelic. If someone is acrogenous then they are sensate. All sensate, philatelic people are manly. All acrogenous people are youngish. If someone is youngish then they are philatelic. All sensate, woven people are acrogenous. Rough, sensate people are woven. Clive is not acrogenous.", "logic": "\nDantean(brent)\nAcrogenous(brent)\nWoven(brent)\nSensate(brent)\nPhilatelic(brent)\nManly(brent)\nDantean(carlena)\nAcrogenous(carlena)\nWoven(carlena)\nManly(carlena)\nYoungish(clive)\nSensate(clive)\nManly(clive)\nYoungish(bernhard)\nPhilatelic(bernhard)\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) -> Sensate(x))\nforall x (Sensate(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Manly(x))\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) -> Youngish(x))\nforall x (Youngish(x) -> Philatelic(x))\nforall x (Sensate(x) and Woven(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nforall x (Philatelic(x) and Sensate(x) -> Woven(x))\n\nnot Acrogenous(clive)\n\nYoungish(clive) and forall x (Youngish(x) -> Philatelic(x)) -> therefore Philatelic(clive) Philatelic(clive) and Sensate(clive) and forall x (Philatelic(x) and Sensate(x) -> Woven(x)) -> therefore Woven(clive) Sensate(clive) and Woven(clive) and forall x (Sensate(x) and Woven(x) -> Acrogenous(x)) -> therefore Acrogenous(clive)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Nita is namibian. Nita is thyroid. Nita is froward. Nita is rushlike. Nita is bowed. Nita is areolar. Mose is namibian. Mose is thyroid. Mose is froward. Mose is areolar. Melamie is everyday. Melamie is rushlike. Melamie is areolar. Penelope is everyday. Penelope is bowed. If someone is thyroid then they are rushlike. All rushlike, bowed people are areolar. All thyroid people are everyday. If someone is everyday then they are bowed. All rushlike, froward people are thyroid. Rough, rushlike people are froward. Penelope is not rushlike.", "logic": "\nNamibian(nita)\nThyroid(nita)\nFroward(nita)\nRushlike(nita)\nBowed(nita)\nAreolar(nita)\nNamibian(mose)\nThyroid(mose)\nFroward(mose)\nAreolar(mose)\nEveryday(melamie)\nRushlike(melamie)\nAreolar(melamie)\nEveryday(penelope)\nBowed(penelope)\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) and Bowed(x) -> Areolar(x))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Everyday(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) -> Bowed(x))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) and Froward(x) -> Thyroid(x))\nforall x (Bowed(x) and Rushlike(x) -> Froward(x))\n\nnot Rushlike(penelope)\n\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Rushlike(x)) <- forall x (Rushlike(x) and Froward(x) -> Thyroid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Jeanie is statuary. Jeanie is unrelieved. Jeanie is blackened. Jeanie is nonnatural. Jeanie is unsnarled. Jeanie is favourite. Shirah is statuary. Shirah is unrelieved. Shirah is blackened. Shirah is favourite. Arielle is varied. Arielle is nonnatural. Arielle is favourite. Rasla is varied. Rasla is unsnarled. If someone is unrelieved then they are nonnatural. All nonnatural, unsnarled people are favourite. All unrelieved people are varied. If someone is varied then they are unsnarled. All nonnatural, blackened people are unrelieved. Rough, nonnatural people are blackened. Rasla is unrelieved.", "logic": "\nStatuary(jeanie)\nUnrelieved(jeanie)\nBlackened(jeanie)\nNonnatural(jeanie)\nUnsnarled(jeanie)\nFavourite(jeanie)\nStatuary(shirah)\nUnrelieved(shirah)\nBlackened(shirah)\nFavourite(shirah)\nVaried(arielle)\nNonnatural(arielle)\nFavourite(arielle)\nVaried(rasla)\nUnsnarled(rasla)\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Unsnarled(x) -> Favourite(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Varied(x))\nforall x (Varied(x) -> Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Blackened(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) and Nonnatural(x) -> Blackened(x))\n\nUnrelieved(rasla)\n\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) and Blackened(x) -> Unrelieved(x)) <- forall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Nonnatural(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Moyra is cropped. Moyra is rushlike. Moyra is angered. Moyra is hooked. Moyra is venerating. Moyra is algonquin. Carlton is cropped. Carlton is rushlike. Carlton is angered. Carlton is algonquin. Dagmar is discontent. Dagmar is hooked. Dagmar is algonquin. Niki is discontent. Niki is venerating. If someone is rushlike then they are hooked. All hooked, venerating people are algonquin. All rushlike people are discontent. If someone is discontent then they are venerating. All hooked, angered people are rushlike. Rough, hooked people are angered. Niki is not algonquin.", "logic": "\nCropped(moyra)\nRushlike(moyra)\nAngered(moyra)\nHooked(moyra)\nVenerating(moyra)\nAlgonquin(moyra)\nCropped(carlton)\nRushlike(carlton)\nAngered(carlton)\nAlgonquin(carlton)\nDiscontent(dagmar)\nHooked(dagmar)\nAlgonquin(dagmar)\nDiscontent(niki)\nVenerating(niki)\nforall x (Rushlike(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Venerating(x) -> Algonquin(x))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) -> Discontent(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Venerating(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Angered(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Venerating(x) and Hooked(x) -> Angered(x))\n\nnot Algonquin(niki)\n\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Venerating(x) -> Algonquin(x)) <- forall x (Rushlike(x) -> Hooked(x)) <- forall x (Hooked(x) and Angered(x) -> Rushlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Archibold is voguish. Archibold is lossless. Archibold is glazed. Archibold is biological. Archibold is glabellar. Archibold is intimal. Florida is voguish. Florida is lossless. Florida is glazed. Florida is intimal. Jerald is rhymed. Jerald is biological. Jerald is intimal. Tamar is rhymed. Tamar is glabellar. If someone is lossless then they are biological. All biological, glabellar people are intimal. All lossless people are rhymed. If someone is rhymed then they are glabellar. All biological, glazed people are lossless. Rough, biological people are glazed. Tamar is glazed.", "logic": "\nVoguish(archibold)\nLossless(archibold)\nGlazed(archibold)\nBiological(archibold)\nGlabellar(archibold)\nIntimal(archibold)\nVoguish(florida)\nLossless(florida)\nGlazed(florida)\nIntimal(florida)\nRhymed(jerald)\nBiological(jerald)\nIntimal(jerald)\nRhymed(tamar)\nGlabellar(tamar)\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Biological(x))\nforall x (Biological(x) and Glabellar(x) -> Intimal(x))\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Rhymed(x))\nforall x (Rhymed(x) -> Glabellar(x))\nforall x (Biological(x) and Glazed(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Glabellar(x) and Biological(x) -> Glazed(x))\n\nGlazed(tamar)\n\nforall x (Glabellar(x) and Biological(x) -> Glazed(x)) <- forall x (Lossless(x) -> Biological(x)) <- forall x (Biological(x) and Glazed(x) -> Lossless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Ruby is cultural. Ruby is compulsory. Ruby is sure. Ruby is armillary. Ruby is amber. Ruby is tricolor. Hetti is cultural. Hetti is compulsory. Hetti is sure. Hetti is tricolor. Everard is depilatory. Everard is armillary. Everard is tricolor. Aleda is depilatory. Aleda is amber. If someone is compulsory then they are armillary. All armillary, amber people are tricolor. All compulsory people are depilatory. If someone is depilatory then they are amber. All armillary, sure people are compulsory. Rough, armillary people are sure. Aleda is not cultural.", "logic": "\nCultural(ruby)\nCompulsory(ruby)\nSure(ruby)\nArmillary(ruby)\nAmber(ruby)\nTricolor(ruby)\nCultural(hetti)\nCompulsory(hetti)\nSure(hetti)\nTricolor(hetti)\nDepilatory(everard)\nArmillary(everard)\nTricolor(everard)\nDepilatory(aleda)\nAmber(aleda)\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Armillary(x))\nforall x (Armillary(x) and Amber(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nforall x (Depilatory(x) -> Amber(x))\nforall x (Armillary(x) and Sure(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Amber(x) and Armillary(x) -> Sure(x))\n\nnot Cultural(aleda)\n\nnot Cultural(aleda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Willis is vacuous. Willis is treeless. Willis is slaty. Willis is habited. Willis is boring. Willis is iterative. Berta is vacuous. Berta is treeless. Berta is slaty. Berta is iterative. Melinde is burmese. Melinde is habited. Melinde is iterative. Prent is burmese. Prent is boring. If someone is treeless then they are habited. All habited, boring people are iterative. All treeless people are burmese. If someone is burmese then they are boring. All habited, slaty people are treeless. Rough, habited people are slaty. Melinde is vacuous.", "logic": "\nVacuous(willis)\nTreeless(willis)\nSlaty(willis)\nHabited(willis)\nBoring(willis)\nIterative(willis)\nVacuous(berta)\nTreeless(berta)\nSlaty(berta)\nIterative(berta)\nBurmese(melinde)\nHabited(melinde)\nIterative(melinde)\nBurmese(prent)\nBoring(prent)\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Habited(x))\nforall x (Habited(x) and Boring(x) -> Iterative(x))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Burmese(x))\nforall x (Burmese(x) -> Boring(x))\nforall x (Habited(x) and Slaty(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) and Habited(x) -> Slaty(x))\n\nVacuous(melinde)\n\nVacuous(melinde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "The lyndy ladle the clark. The selie is not starchless. The clark think the lyndy. If someone is macho and they need the clark then the clark does not need the lyndy. If someone reassure the selie then they are squeamish. If the clark think the lyndy then the clark reassure the selie. If the selie does not like the lyndy then the selie is not macho. If the lyndy think the selie then the lyndy does not like the clark. If someone is unsuasible and they like the selie then the selie reassure the clark. If someone is squeamish then they like the selie. If someone is squeamish then they need the selie. The selie is not starchless.", "logic": "\nLadle(lyndy, clark)\nnot Starchless(selie)\nThink(clark, lyndy)\nforall x (Macho(x) and Reassure(x, clark) -> not Reassure(clark, lyndy))\nforall x (Reassure(x, selie) -> Squeamish(x))\nThink(clark, lyndy) -> Reassure(clark, selie)\nnot Think(selie, lyndy) -> not Macho(selie)\nThink(lyndy, selie) -> not Think(lyndy, clark)\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) and Think(x, selie) -> Reassure(selie, clark))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) -> Think(x, selie))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) -> Reassure(x, selie))\n\nnot Starchless(selie)\n\ntherefore not Starchless(selie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The adams shampoo the morgana. The helyn is not bayesian. The morgana fork the adams. If someone is virile and they need the morgana then the morgana does not need the adams. If someone rebel the helyn then they are shaved. If the morgana fork the adams then the morgana rebel the helyn. If the helyn does not like the adams then the helyn is not virile. If the adams fork the helyn then the adams does not like the morgana. If someone is aoristic and they like the helyn then the helyn rebel the morgana. If someone is shaved then they like the helyn. If someone is shaved then they need the helyn. The adams does not see the morgana.", "logic": "\nShampoo(adams, morgana)\nnot Bayesian(helyn)\nFork(morgana, adams)\nforall x (Virile(x) and Rebel(x, morgana) -> not Rebel(morgana, adams))\nforall x (Rebel(x, helyn) -> Shaved(x))\nFork(morgana, adams) -> Rebel(morgana, helyn)\nnot Fork(helyn, adams) -> not Virile(helyn)\nFork(adams, helyn) -> not Fork(adams, morgana)\nforall x (Aoristic(x) and Fork(x, helyn) -> Rebel(helyn, morgana))\nforall x (Shaved(x) -> Fork(x, helyn))\nforall x (Shaved(x) -> Rebel(x, helyn))\n\nnot Shampoo(adams, morgana)\n\ntherefore Shampoo(adams, morgana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The lida urinate the gerladina. The corny is not saxatile. The gerladina indurate the lida. If someone is unicameral and they need the gerladina then the gerladina does not need the lida. If someone bawl the corny then they are awful. If the gerladina indurate the lida then the gerladina bawl the corny. If the corny does not like the lida then the corny is not unicameral. If the lida indurate the corny then the lida does not like the gerladina. If someone is bare and they like the corny then the corny bawl the gerladina. If someone is awful then they like the corny. If someone is awful then they need the corny. The gerladina bawl the corny.", "logic": "\nUrinate(lida, gerladina)\nnot Saxatile(corny)\nIndurate(gerladina, lida)\nforall x (Unicameral(x) and Bawl(x, gerladina) -> not Bawl(gerladina, lida))\nforall x (Bawl(x, corny) -> Awful(x))\nIndurate(gerladina, lida) -> Bawl(gerladina, corny)\nnot Indurate(corny, lida) -> not Unicameral(corny)\nIndurate(lida, corny) -> not Indurate(lida, gerladina)\nforall x (Bare(x) and Indurate(x, corny) -> Bawl(corny, gerladina))\nforall x (Awful(x) -> Indurate(x, corny))\nforall x (Awful(x) -> Bawl(x, corny))\n\nBawl(gerladina, corny)\n\nIndurate(gerladina, lida) and Indurate(gerladina, lida) -> Bawl(gerladina, corny) -> therefore Bawl(gerladina, corny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The rozamond disaccord the garey. The felecia is not nosy. The garey dismember the rozamond. If someone is planktonic and they need the garey then the garey does not need the rozamond. If someone reclaim the felecia then they are fueled. If the garey dismember the rozamond then the garey reclaim the felecia. If the felecia does not like the rozamond then the felecia is not planktonic. If the rozamond dismember the felecia then the rozamond does not like the garey. If someone is bituminous and they like the felecia then the felecia reclaim the garey. If someone is fueled then they like the felecia. If someone is fueled then they need the felecia. The garey does not need the felecia.", "logic": "\nDisaccord(rozamond, garey)\nnot Nosy(felecia)\nDismember(garey, rozamond)\nforall x (Planktonic(x) and Reclaim(x, garey) -> not Reclaim(garey, rozamond))\nforall x (Reclaim(x, felecia) -> Fueled(x))\nDismember(garey, rozamond) -> Reclaim(garey, felecia)\nnot Dismember(felecia, rozamond) -> not Planktonic(felecia)\nDismember(rozamond, felecia) -> not Dismember(rozamond, garey)\nforall x (Bituminous(x) and Dismember(x, felecia) -> Reclaim(felecia, garey))\nforall x (Fueled(x) -> Dismember(x, felecia))\nforall x (Fueled(x) -> Reclaim(x, felecia))\n\nnot Reclaim(garey, felecia)\n\nDismember(garey, rozamond) and Dismember(garey, rozamond) -> Reclaim(garey, felecia) -> therefore Reclaim(garey, felecia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The bjorn smear the mart. The sanford is not unnatural. The mart respect the bjorn. If someone is speedy and they need the mart then the mart does not need the bjorn. If someone evaporate the sanford then they are unreal. If the mart respect the bjorn then the mart evaporate the sanford. If the sanford does not like the bjorn then the sanford is not speedy. If the bjorn respect the sanford then the bjorn does not like the mart. If someone is devouring and they like the sanford then the sanford evaporate the mart. If someone is unreal then they like the sanford. If someone is unreal then they need the sanford. The mart is unreal.", "logic": "\nSmear(bjorn, mart)\nnot Unnatural(sanford)\nRespect(mart, bjorn)\nforall x (Speedy(x) and Evaporate(x, mart) -> not Evaporate(mart, bjorn))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, sanford) -> Unreal(x))\nRespect(mart, bjorn) -> Evaporate(mart, sanford)\nnot Respect(sanford, bjorn) -> not Speedy(sanford)\nRespect(bjorn, sanford) -> not Respect(bjorn, mart)\nforall x (Devouring(x) and Respect(x, sanford) -> Evaporate(sanford, mart))\nforall x (Unreal(x) -> Respect(x, sanford))\nforall x (Unreal(x) -> Evaporate(x, sanford))\n\nUnreal(mart)\n\nRespect(mart, bjorn) and Respect(mart, bjorn) -> Evaporate(mart, sanford) -> therefore Evaporate(mart, sanford) Evaporate(mart, sanford) and forall x (Evaporate(x, sanford) -> Unreal(x)) -> therefore Unreal(mart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The jessica wrap the herrick. The winifred is not caddish. The herrick beef the jessica. If someone is mozambican and they need the herrick then the herrick does not need the jessica. If someone flense the winifred then they are saliferous. If the herrick beef the jessica then the herrick flense the winifred. If the winifred does not like the jessica then the winifred is not mozambican. If the jessica beef the winifred then the jessica does not like the herrick. If someone is british and they like the winifred then the winifred flense the herrick. If someone is saliferous then they like the winifred. If someone is saliferous then they need the winifred. The herrick is not saliferous.", "logic": "\nWrap(jessica, herrick)\nnot Caddish(winifred)\nBeef(herrick, jessica)\nforall x (Mozambican(x) and Flense(x, herrick) -> not Flense(herrick, jessica))\nforall x (Flense(x, winifred) -> Saliferous(x))\nBeef(herrick, jessica) -> Flense(herrick, winifred)\nnot Beef(winifred, jessica) -> not Mozambican(winifred)\nBeef(jessica, winifred) -> not Beef(jessica, herrick)\nforall x (British(x) and Beef(x, winifred) -> Flense(winifred, herrick))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) -> Beef(x, winifred))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) -> Flense(x, winifred))\n\nnot Saliferous(herrick)\n\nBeef(herrick, jessica) and Beef(herrick, jessica) -> Flense(herrick, winifred) -> therefore Flense(herrick, winifred) Flense(herrick, winifred) and forall x (Flense(x, winifred) -> Saliferous(x)) -> therefore Saliferous(herrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The dixie bracket the andra. The standford is not appointed. The andra inch the dixie. If someone is granulose and they need the andra then the andra does not need the dixie. If someone modify the standford then they are slaphappy. If the andra inch the dixie then the andra modify the standford. If the standford does not like the dixie then the standford is not granulose. If the dixie inch the standford then the dixie does not like the andra. If someone is latin and they like the standford then the standford modify the andra. If someone is slaphappy then they like the standford. If someone is slaphappy then they need the standford. The andra inch the standford.", "logic": "\nBracket(dixie, andra)\nnot Appointed(standford)\nInch(andra, dixie)\nforall x (Granulose(x) and Modify(x, andra) -> not Modify(andra, dixie))\nforall x (Modify(x, standford) -> Slaphappy(x))\nInch(andra, dixie) -> Modify(andra, standford)\nnot Inch(standford, dixie) -> not Granulose(standford)\nInch(dixie, standford) -> not Inch(dixie, andra)\nforall x (Latin(x) and Inch(x, standford) -> Modify(standford, andra))\nforall x (Slaphappy(x) -> Inch(x, standford))\nforall x (Slaphappy(x) -> Modify(x, standford))\n\nInch(andra, standford)\n\nInch(andra, dixie) and Inch(andra, dixie) -> Modify(andra, standford) -> therefore Modify(andra, standford) Modify(andra, standford) and forall x (Modify(x, standford) -> Slaphappy(x)) -> therefore Slaphappy(andra) Slaphappy(andra) and forall x (Slaphappy(x) -> Inch(x, standford)) -> therefore Inch(andra, standford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The kaylil campaign the phillip. The rodi is not prefatory. The phillip oink the kaylil. If someone is auditory and they need the phillip then the phillip does not need the kaylil. If someone halloo the rodi then they are novel. If the phillip oink the kaylil then the phillip halloo the rodi. If the rodi does not like the kaylil then the rodi is not auditory. If the kaylil oink the rodi then the kaylil does not like the phillip. If someone is effusive and they like the rodi then the rodi halloo the phillip. If someone is novel then they like the rodi. If someone is novel then they need the rodi. The phillip does not like the rodi.", "logic": "\nCampaign(kaylil, phillip)\nnot Prefatory(rodi)\nOink(phillip, kaylil)\nforall x (Auditory(x) and Halloo(x, phillip) -> not Halloo(phillip, kaylil))\nforall x (Halloo(x, rodi) -> Novel(x))\nOink(phillip, kaylil) -> Halloo(phillip, rodi)\nnot Oink(rodi, kaylil) -> not Auditory(rodi)\nOink(kaylil, rodi) -> not Oink(kaylil, phillip)\nforall x (Effusive(x) and Oink(x, rodi) -> Halloo(rodi, phillip))\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Oink(x, rodi))\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Halloo(x, rodi))\n\nnot Oink(phillip, rodi)\n\nOink(phillip, kaylil) and Oink(phillip, kaylil) -> Halloo(phillip, rodi) -> therefore Halloo(phillip, rodi) Halloo(phillip, rodi) and forall x (Halloo(x, rodi) -> Novel(x)) -> therefore Novel(phillip) Novel(phillip) and forall x (Novel(x) -> Oink(x, rodi)) -> therefore Oink(phillip, rodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The ursuline whelk the freddi. The jerry is not paradisal. The freddi unsolder the ursuline. If someone is joyful and they need the freddi then the freddi does not need the ursuline. If someone cause the jerry then they are puffy. If the freddi unsolder the ursuline then the freddi cause the jerry. If the jerry does not like the ursuline then the jerry is not joyful. If the ursuline unsolder the jerry then the ursuline does not like the freddi. If someone is afoot and they like the jerry then the jerry cause the freddi. If someone is puffy then they like the jerry. If someone is puffy then they need the jerry. The jerry is not puffy.", "logic": "\nWhelk(ursuline, freddi)\nnot Paradisal(jerry)\nUnsolder(freddi, ursuline)\nforall x (Joyful(x) and Cause(x, freddi) -> not Cause(freddi, ursuline))\nforall x (Cause(x, jerry) -> Puffy(x))\nUnsolder(freddi, ursuline) -> Cause(freddi, jerry)\nnot Unsolder(jerry, ursuline) -> not Joyful(jerry)\nUnsolder(ursuline, jerry) -> not Unsolder(ursuline, freddi)\nforall x (Afoot(x) and Unsolder(x, jerry) -> Cause(jerry, freddi))\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Unsolder(x, jerry))\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Cause(x, jerry))\n\nnot Puffy(jerry)\n\nforall x (Cause(x, jerry) -> Puffy(x)) <- forall x (Puffy(x) -> Cause(x, jerry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The vicki review the caressa. The gwyneth is not slavic. The caressa bound the vicki. If someone is bawdy and they need the caressa then the caressa does not need the vicki. If someone pretend the gwyneth then they are starved. If the caressa bound the vicki then the caressa pretend the gwyneth. If the gwyneth does not like the vicki then the gwyneth is not bawdy. If the vicki bound the gwyneth then the vicki does not like the caressa. If someone is mangled and they like the gwyneth then the gwyneth pretend the caressa. If someone is starved then they like the gwyneth. If someone is starved then they need the gwyneth. The vicki pretend the gwyneth.", "logic": "\nReview(vicki, caressa)\nnot Slavic(gwyneth)\nBound(caressa, vicki)\nforall x (Bawdy(x) and Pretend(x, caressa) -> not Pretend(caressa, vicki))\nforall x (Pretend(x, gwyneth) -> Starved(x))\nBound(caressa, vicki) -> Pretend(caressa, gwyneth)\nnot Bound(gwyneth, vicki) -> not Bawdy(gwyneth)\nBound(vicki, gwyneth) -> not Bound(vicki, caressa)\nforall x (Mangled(x) and Bound(x, gwyneth) -> Pretend(gwyneth, caressa))\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Bound(x, gwyneth))\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Pretend(x, gwyneth))\n\nPretend(vicki, gwyneth)\n\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Pretend(x, gwyneth)) <- forall x (Pretend(x, gwyneth) -> Starved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The augustin bump the caldwell. The perceval is not dampish. The caldwell receipt the augustin. If someone is indexless and they need the caldwell then the caldwell does not need the augustin. If someone brevet the perceval then they are primordial. If the caldwell receipt the augustin then the caldwell brevet the perceval. If the perceval does not like the augustin then the perceval is not indexless. If the augustin receipt the perceval then the augustin does not like the caldwell. If someone is schematic and they like the perceval then the perceval brevet the caldwell. If someone is primordial then they like the perceval. If someone is primordial then they need the perceval. The perceval does not need the perceval.", "logic": "\nBump(augustin, caldwell)\nnot Dampish(perceval)\nReceipt(caldwell, augustin)\nforall x (Indexless(x) and Brevet(x, caldwell) -> not Brevet(caldwell, augustin))\nforall x (Brevet(x, perceval) -> Primordial(x))\nReceipt(caldwell, augustin) -> Brevet(caldwell, perceval)\nnot Receipt(perceval, augustin) -> not Indexless(perceval)\nReceipt(augustin, perceval) -> not Receipt(augustin, caldwell)\nforall x (Schematic(x) and Receipt(x, perceval) -> Brevet(perceval, caldwell))\nforall x (Primordial(x) -> Receipt(x, perceval))\nforall x (Primordial(x) -> Brevet(x, perceval))\n\nnot Brevet(perceval, perceval)\n\nforall x (Primordial(x) -> Brevet(x, perceval)) <- forall x (Brevet(x, perceval) -> Primordial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The kingston fork the gabriel. The husein is not discreet. The gabriel warn the kingston. If someone is elated and they need the gabriel then the gabriel does not need the kingston. If someone ally the husein then they are despotic. If the gabriel warn the kingston then the gabriel ally the husein. If the husein does not like the kingston then the husein is not elated. If the kingston warn the husein then the kingston does not like the gabriel. If someone is wishful and they like the husein then the husein ally the gabriel. If someone is despotic then they like the husein. If someone is despotic then they need the husein. The husein warn the husein.", "logic": "\nFork(kingston, gabriel)\nnot Discreet(husein)\nWarn(gabriel, kingston)\nforall x (Elated(x) and Ally(x, gabriel) -> not Ally(gabriel, kingston))\nforall x (Ally(x, husein) -> Despotic(x))\nWarn(gabriel, kingston) -> Ally(gabriel, husein)\nnot Warn(husein, kingston) -> not Elated(husein)\nWarn(kingston, husein) -> not Warn(kingston, gabriel)\nforall x (Wishful(x) and Warn(x, husein) -> Ally(husein, gabriel))\nforall x (Despotic(x) -> Warn(x, husein))\nforall x (Despotic(x) -> Ally(x, husein))\n\nWarn(husein, husein)\n\nforall x (Despotic(x) -> Warn(x, husein)) <- forall x (Ally(x, husein) -> Despotic(x)) <- forall x (Despotic(x) -> Ally(x, husein)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The gussie victimise the stefan. The rivalee is not biform. The stefan outstay the gussie. If someone is antitumor and they need the stefan then the stefan does not need the gussie. If someone squeeze the rivalee then they are colourless. If the stefan outstay the gussie then the stefan squeeze the rivalee. If the rivalee does not like the gussie then the rivalee is not antitumor. If the gussie outstay the rivalee then the gussie does not like the stefan. If someone is darwinian and they like the rivalee then the rivalee squeeze the stefan. If someone is colourless then they like the rivalee. If someone is colourless then they need the rivalee. The stefan does not see the stefan.", "logic": "\nVictimise(gussie, stefan)\nnot Biform(rivalee)\nOutstay(stefan, gussie)\nforall x (Antitumor(x) and Squeeze(x, stefan) -> not Squeeze(stefan, gussie))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, rivalee) -> Colourless(x))\nOutstay(stefan, gussie) -> Squeeze(stefan, rivalee)\nnot Outstay(rivalee, gussie) -> not Antitumor(rivalee)\nOutstay(gussie, rivalee) -> not Outstay(gussie, stefan)\nforall x (Darwinian(x) and Outstay(x, rivalee) -> Squeeze(rivalee, stefan))\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Outstay(x, rivalee))\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Squeeze(x, rivalee))\n\nnot Victimise(stefan, stefan)\n\nnot Victimise(stefan, stefan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The ward virilise the annissa. The babette is not beforehand. The annissa galvanise the ward. If someone is meagre and they need the annissa then the annissa does not need the ward. If someone detox the babette then they are unbridled. If the annissa galvanise the ward then the annissa detox the babette. If the babette does not like the ward then the babette is not meagre. If the ward galvanise the babette then the ward does not like the annissa. If someone is dying and they like the babette then the babette detox the annissa. If someone is unbridled then they like the babette. If someone is unbridled then they need the babette. The babette virilise the ward.", "logic": "\nVirilise(ward, annissa)\nnot Beforehand(babette)\nGalvanise(annissa, ward)\nforall x (Meagre(x) and Detox(x, annissa) -> not Detox(annissa, ward))\nforall x (Detox(x, babette) -> Unbridled(x))\nGalvanise(annissa, ward) -> Detox(annissa, babette)\nnot Galvanise(babette, ward) -> not Meagre(babette)\nGalvanise(ward, babette) -> not Galvanise(ward, annissa)\nforall x (Dying(x) and Galvanise(x, babette) -> Detox(babette, annissa))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Galvanise(x, babette))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Detox(x, babette))\n\nVirilise(babette, ward)\n\nVirilise(babette, ward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The zacharias blab the berny. The melva is not untreated. The berny stick the zacharias. If someone is acetose and they need the berny then the berny does not need the zacharias. If someone appease the melva then they are rainless. If the berny stick the zacharias then the berny appease the melva. If the melva does not like the zacharias then the melva is not acetose. If the zacharias stick the melva then the zacharias does not like the berny. If someone is favorite and they like the melva then the melva appease the berny. If someone is rainless then they like the melva. If someone is rainless then they need the melva. The zacharias does not need the berny.", "logic": "\nBlab(zacharias, berny)\nnot Untreated(melva)\nStick(berny, zacharias)\nforall x (Acetose(x) and Appease(x, berny) -> not Appease(berny, zacharias))\nforall x (Appease(x, melva) -> Rainless(x))\nStick(berny, zacharias) -> Appease(berny, melva)\nnot Stick(melva, zacharias) -> not Acetose(melva)\nStick(zacharias, melva) -> not Stick(zacharias, berny)\nforall x (Favorite(x) and Stick(x, melva) -> Appease(melva, berny))\nforall x (Rainless(x) -> Stick(x, melva))\nforall x (Rainless(x) -> Appease(x, melva))\n\nnot Appease(zacharias, berny)\n\nnot Appease(zacharias, berny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The kristine prohibit the sarah. The shirah is not ungummed. The sarah unmake the kristine. If someone is further and they need the sarah then the sarah does not need the kristine. If someone legalise the shirah then they are phenomenal. If the sarah unmake the kristine then the sarah legalise the shirah. If the shirah does not like the kristine then the shirah is not further. If the kristine unmake the shirah then the kristine does not like the sarah. If someone is sanitized and they like the shirah then the shirah legalise the sarah. If someone is phenomenal then they like the shirah. If someone is phenomenal then they need the shirah. The kristine unmake the kristine.", "logic": "\nProhibit(kristine, sarah)\nnot Ungummed(shirah)\nUnmake(sarah, kristine)\nforall x (Further(x) and Legalise(x, sarah) -> not Legalise(sarah, kristine))\nforall x (Legalise(x, shirah) -> Phenomenal(x))\nUnmake(sarah, kristine) -> Legalise(sarah, shirah)\nnot Unmake(shirah, kristine) -> not Further(shirah)\nUnmake(kristine, shirah) -> not Unmake(kristine, sarah)\nforall x (Sanitized(x) and Unmake(x, shirah) -> Legalise(shirah, sarah))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Unmake(x, shirah))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Legalise(x, shirah))\n\nUnmake(kristine, kristine)\n\nUnmake(kristine, kristine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "Flora is utterable. Roxie is speckless. Roxie is rheumy. Sheelagh is not wailful. Sheelagh is rheumy. Marcellus is clad. Marcellus is not rheumy. If Roxie is utterable then Roxie is wailful. If Roxie is wailful then Roxie is granular. If Roxie is speckless then Roxie is utterable. Roxie is rheumy.", "logic": "\nUtterable(flora)\nSpeckless(roxie)\nRheumy(roxie)\nnot Wailful(sheelagh)\nRheumy(sheelagh)\nClad(marcellus)\nnot Rheumy(marcellus)\nUtterable(roxie) -> Wailful(roxie)\nWailful(roxie) -> Granular(roxie)\nSpeckless(roxie) -> Utterable(roxie)\n\nRheumy(roxie)\n\ntherefore Rheumy(roxie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Purcell is zapotec. Tori is acoustic. Tori is tasselled. Sarah is not binding. Sarah is tasselled. Anton is lifted. Anton is not tasselled. If Tori is zapotec then Tori is binding. If Tori is binding then Tori is topnotch. If Tori is acoustic then Tori is zapotec. Sarah is not tasselled.", "logic": "\nZapotec(purcell)\nAcoustic(tori)\nTasselled(tori)\nnot Binding(sarah)\nTasselled(sarah)\nLifted(anton)\nnot Tasselled(anton)\nZapotec(tori) -> Binding(tori)\nBinding(tori) -> Topnotch(tori)\nAcoustic(tori) -> Zapotec(tori)\n\nnot Tasselled(sarah)\n\ntherefore Tasselled(sarah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Bernelle is catalan. Pansie is shamefaced. Pansie is inaudible. Abbey is not baffling. Abbey is inaudible. Moore is roguish. Moore is not inaudible. If Pansie is catalan then Pansie is baffling. If Pansie is baffling then Pansie is micropylar. If Pansie is shamefaced then Pansie is catalan. Pansie is catalan.", "logic": "\nCatalan(bernelle)\nShamefaced(pansie)\nInaudible(pansie)\nnot Baffling(abbey)\nInaudible(abbey)\nRoguish(moore)\nnot Inaudible(moore)\nCatalan(pansie) -> Baffling(pansie)\nBaffling(pansie) -> Micropylar(pansie)\nShamefaced(pansie) -> Catalan(pansie)\n\nCatalan(pansie)\n\nShamefaced(pansie) and Shamefaced(pansie) -> Catalan(pansie) -> therefore Catalan(pansie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Norry is saved. Hurley is damaging. Hurley is defoliated. Hamlen is not monetary. Hamlen is defoliated. Rochelle is astomatous. Rochelle is not defoliated. If Hurley is saved then Hurley is monetary. If Hurley is monetary then Hurley is apogean. If Hurley is damaging then Hurley is saved. Hurley is not saved.", "logic": "\nSaved(norry)\nDamaging(hurley)\nDefoliated(hurley)\nnot Monetary(hamlen)\nDefoliated(hamlen)\nAstomatous(rochelle)\nnot Defoliated(rochelle)\nSaved(hurley) -> Monetary(hurley)\nMonetary(hurley) -> Apogean(hurley)\nDamaging(hurley) -> Saved(hurley)\n\nnot Saved(hurley)\n\nDamaging(hurley) and Damaging(hurley) -> Saved(hurley) -> therefore Saved(hurley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Kellen is choice. Honey is ossified. Honey is nethermost. Pepi is not ilxxx. Pepi is nethermost. Tiebold is unsounded. Tiebold is not nethermost. If Honey is choice then Honey is ilxxx. If Honey is ilxxx then Honey is imperfect. If Honey is ossified then Honey is choice. Honey is ilxxx.", "logic": "\nChoice(kellen)\nOssified(honey)\nNethermost(honey)\nnot Ilxxx(pepi)\nNethermost(pepi)\nUnsounded(tiebold)\nnot Nethermost(tiebold)\nChoice(honey) -> Ilxxx(honey)\nIlxxx(honey) -> Imperfect(honey)\nOssified(honey) -> Choice(honey)\n\nIlxxx(honey)\n\nOssified(honey) and Ossified(honey) -> Choice(honey) -> therefore Choice(honey) Choice(honey) and Choice(honey) -> Ilxxx(honey) -> therefore Ilxxx(honey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Goose is anurous. Bettine is bulging. Bettine is anthropoid. Nickie is not echoless. Nickie is anthropoid. Gretal is hifalutin. Gretal is not anthropoid. If Bettine is anurous then Bettine is echoless. If Bettine is echoless then Bettine is sweptwing. If Bettine is bulging then Bettine is anurous. Bettine is not echoless.", "logic": "\nAnurous(goose)\nBulging(bettine)\nAnthropoid(bettine)\nnot Echoless(nickie)\nAnthropoid(nickie)\nHifalutin(gretal)\nnot Anthropoid(gretal)\nAnurous(bettine) -> Echoless(bettine)\nEcholess(bettine) -> Sweptwing(bettine)\nBulging(bettine) -> Anurous(bettine)\n\nnot Echoless(bettine)\n\nBulging(bettine) and Bulging(bettine) -> Anurous(bettine) -> therefore Anurous(bettine) Anurous(bettine) and Anurous(bettine) -> Echoless(bettine) -> therefore Echoless(bettine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Berk is odorous. Daune is untainted. Daune is extensive. Dorey is not calycular. Dorey is extensive. Abe is grooved. Abe is not extensive. If Daune is odorous then Daune is calycular. If Daune is calycular then Daune is subfusc. If Daune is untainted then Daune is odorous. Daune is subfusc.", "logic": "\nOdorous(berk)\nUntainted(daune)\nExtensive(daune)\nnot Calycular(dorey)\nExtensive(dorey)\nGrooved(abe)\nnot Extensive(abe)\nOdorous(daune) -> Calycular(daune)\nCalycular(daune) -> Subfusc(daune)\nUntainted(daune) -> Odorous(daune)\n\nSubfusc(daune)\n\nUntainted(daune) and Untainted(daune) -> Odorous(daune) -> therefore Odorous(daune) Odorous(daune) and Odorous(daune) -> Calycular(daune) -> therefore Calycular(daune) Calycular(daune) and Calycular(daune) -> Subfusc(daune) -> therefore Subfusc(daune)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Griffith is basaltic. Dora is flighted. Dora is reformable. Eleanore is not sagittate. Eleanore is reformable. Pier is reentrant. Pier is not reformable. If Dora is basaltic then Dora is sagittate. If Dora is sagittate then Dora is anachronic. If Dora is flighted then Dora is basaltic. Dora is not anachronic.", "logic": "\nBasaltic(griffith)\nFlighted(dora)\nReformable(dora)\nnot Sagittate(eleanore)\nReformable(eleanore)\nReentrant(pier)\nnot Reformable(pier)\nBasaltic(dora) -> Sagittate(dora)\nSagittate(dora) -> Anachronic(dora)\nFlighted(dora) -> Basaltic(dora)\n\nnot Anachronic(dora)\n\nFlighted(dora) and Flighted(dora) -> Basaltic(dora) -> therefore Basaltic(dora) Basaltic(dora) and Basaltic(dora) -> Sagittate(dora) -> therefore Sagittate(dora) Sagittate(dora) and Sagittate(dora) -> Anachronic(dora) -> therefore Anachronic(dora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Caryn is bifurcated. Midge is meaning. Midge is iron. Orlando is not shinto. Orlando is iron. Lauraine is unartistic. Lauraine is not iron. If Midge is bifurcated then Midge is shinto. If Midge is shinto then Midge is platyrhine. If Midge is meaning then Midge is bifurcated. Orlando is not unartistic.", "logic": "\nBifurcated(caryn)\nMeaning(midge)\nIron(midge)\nnot Shinto(orlando)\nIron(orlando)\nUnartistic(lauraine)\nnot Iron(lauraine)\nBifurcated(midge) -> Shinto(midge)\nShinto(midge) -> Platyrhine(midge)\nMeaning(midge) -> Bifurcated(midge)\n\nnot Unartistic(orlando)\n\nnot Unartistic(orlando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Babs is nonchalant. Benjie is embryonic. Benjie is select. Nani is not edental. Nani is select. Ardra is sloughy. Ardra is not select. If Benjie is nonchalant then Benjie is edental. If Benjie is edental then Benjie is little. If Benjie is embryonic then Benjie is nonchalant. Ardra is young.", "logic": "\nNonchalant(babs)\nEmbryonic(benjie)\nSelect(benjie)\nnot Edental(nani)\nSelect(nani)\nSloughy(ardra)\nnot Select(ardra)\nNonchalant(benjie) -> Edental(benjie)\nEdental(benjie) -> Little(benjie)\nEmbryonic(benjie) -> Nonchalant(benjie)\n\nYoung(ardra)\n\nYoung(ardra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Leontine is unarguable. Archie is onside. Archie is provable. Verina is not castrated. Verina is provable. Karylin is debased. Karylin is not provable. If Archie is unarguable then Archie is castrated. If Archie is castrated then Archie is penal. If Archie is onside then Archie is unarguable. Verina is not onside.", "logic": "\nUnarguable(leontine)\nOnside(archie)\nProvable(archie)\nnot Castrated(verina)\nProvable(verina)\nDebased(karylin)\nnot Provable(karylin)\nUnarguable(archie) -> Castrated(archie)\nCastrated(archie) -> Penal(archie)\nOnside(archie) -> Unarguable(archie)\n\nnot Onside(verina)\n\nnot Onside(verina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Rebecka is incapable. Gabriel is degenerate. Gabriel is striped. Suzzy is not oozy. Suzzy is striped. John is crosswise. John is not striped. If Gabriel is incapable then Gabriel is oozy. If Gabriel is oozy then Gabriel is umbellate. If Gabriel is degenerate then Gabriel is incapable. John is oozy.", "logic": "\nIncapable(rebecka)\nDegenerate(gabriel)\nStriped(gabriel)\nnot Oozy(suzzy)\nStriped(suzzy)\nCrosswise(john)\nnot Striped(john)\nIncapable(gabriel) -> Oozy(gabriel)\nOozy(gabriel) -> Umbellate(gabriel)\nDegenerate(gabriel) -> Incapable(gabriel)\n\nOozy(john)\n\nOozy(john) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Ronny is size. Donald is perky. Donald is commercial. Kissiah is not sintered. Kissiah is commercial. Margette is prostate. Margette is not commercial. If Donald is size then Donald is sintered. If Donald is sintered then Donald is aeolian. If Donald is perky then Donald is size. Ronny is not commercial.", "logic": "\nSize(ronny)\nPerky(donald)\nCommercial(donald)\nnot Sintered(kissiah)\nCommercial(kissiah)\nProstate(margette)\nnot Commercial(margette)\nSize(donald) -> Sintered(donald)\nSintered(donald) -> Aeolian(donald)\nPerky(donald) -> Size(donald)\n\nnot Commercial(ronny)\n\nnot Commercial(ronny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Mellisa is blotchy. Sibylle is larval. Sibylle is brahminic. Elvira is not mistakable. Elvira is brahminic. Erminie is sciatic. Erminie is not brahminic. If Sibylle is blotchy then Sibylle is mistakable. If Sibylle is mistakable then Sibylle is retro. If Sibylle is larval then Sibylle is blotchy. Mellisa is sciatic.", "logic": "\nBlotchy(mellisa)\nLarval(sibylle)\nBrahminic(sibylle)\nnot Mistakable(elvira)\nBrahminic(elvira)\nSciatic(erminie)\nnot Brahminic(erminie)\nBlotchy(sibylle) -> Mistakable(sibylle)\nMistakable(sibylle) -> Retro(sibylle)\nLarval(sibylle) -> Blotchy(sibylle)\n\nSciatic(mellisa)\n\nSciatic(mellisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Leticia is bust. Candie is armorial. Candie is pinchbeck. Franny is not recessed. Franny is pinchbeck. Juliana is arachnoid. Juliana is not pinchbeck. If Candie is bust then Candie is recessed. If Candie is recessed then Candie is nativistic. If Candie is armorial then Candie is bust. Leticia is not nativistic.", "logic": "\nBust(leticia)\nArmorial(candie)\nPinchbeck(candie)\nnot Recessed(franny)\nPinchbeck(franny)\nArachnoid(juliana)\nnot Pinchbeck(juliana)\nBust(candie) -> Recessed(candie)\nRecessed(candie) -> Nativistic(candie)\nArmorial(candie) -> Bust(candie)\n\nnot Nativistic(leticia)\n\nnot Nativistic(leticia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Jeniffer is baptized. Tammi is bigeminal. Tammi is acuate. Aviva is not fifteenth. Aviva is acuate. Oprah is zoic. Oprah is not acuate. If Tammi is baptized then Tammi is fifteenth. If Tammi is fifteenth then Tammi is outclassed. If Tammi is bigeminal then Tammi is baptized. Aviva is baptized.", "logic": "\nBaptized(jeniffer)\nBigeminal(tammi)\nAcuate(tammi)\nnot Fifteenth(aviva)\nAcuate(aviva)\nZoic(oprah)\nnot Acuate(oprah)\nBaptized(tammi) -> Fifteenth(tammi)\nFifteenth(tammi) -> Outclassed(tammi)\nBigeminal(tammi) -> Baptized(tammi)\n\nBaptized(aviva)\n\nBaptized(aviva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "The corri twitter the garnette. The garnette tauten the corri. The garnette is vengeful. If something flank the garnette then it tauten the corri. If something twitter the corri and the corri twitter the garnette then the garnette tauten the corri. If something tauten the corri then the corri flank the garnette. If something twitter the corri then it is vengeful. If something tauten the garnette then the garnette is romanic. If something tauten the garnette and it is romanic then the garnette flank the corri. If something is vengeful and it twitter the garnette then the garnette twitter the corri. If something is vengeful then it tauten the garnette. The garnette is vengeful.", "logic": "\nTwitter(corri, garnette)\nTauten(garnette, corri)\nVengeful(garnette)\nforall x (Flank(x, garnette) -> Tauten(x, corri))\nforall x (Twitter(x, corri) and Twitter(corri, garnette) -> Tauten(garnette, corri))\nforall x (Tauten(x, corri) -> Flank(corri, garnette))\nforall x (Twitter(x, corri) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Tauten(x, garnette) -> Romanic(garnette))\nforall x (Tauten(x, garnette) and Romanic(x) -> Flank(garnette, corri))\nforall x (Vengeful(x) and Twitter(x, garnette) -> Twitter(garnette, corri))\nforall x (Vengeful(x) -> Tauten(x, garnette))\n\nVengeful(garnette)\n\ntherefore Vengeful(garnette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The woodie predicate the madel. The madel fellate the woodie. The madel is gasified. If something scribe the madel then it fellate the woodie. If something predicate the woodie and the woodie predicate the madel then the madel fellate the woodie. If something fellate the woodie then the woodie scribe the madel. If something predicate the woodie then it is gasified. If something fellate the madel then the madel is jaundiced. If something fellate the madel and it is jaundiced then the madel scribe the woodie. If something is gasified and it predicate the madel then the madel predicate the woodie. If something is gasified then it fellate the madel. The madel does not chase the woodie.", "logic": "\nPredicate(woodie, madel)\nFellate(madel, woodie)\nGasified(madel)\nforall x (Scribe(x, madel) -> Fellate(x, woodie))\nforall x (Predicate(x, woodie) and Predicate(woodie, madel) -> Fellate(madel, woodie))\nforall x (Fellate(x, woodie) -> Scribe(woodie, madel))\nforall x (Predicate(x, woodie) -> Gasified(x))\nforall x (Fellate(x, madel) -> Jaundiced(madel))\nforall x (Fellate(x, madel) and Jaundiced(x) -> Scribe(madel, woodie))\nforall x (Gasified(x) and Predicate(x, madel) -> Predicate(madel, woodie))\nforall x (Gasified(x) -> Fellate(x, madel))\n\nnot Fellate(madel, woodie)\n\ntherefore Fellate(madel, woodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The jae interlard the muffin. The muffin interview the jae. The muffin is soaring. If something poll the muffin then it interview the jae. If something interlard the jae and the jae interlard the muffin then the muffin interview the jae. If something interview the jae then the jae poll the muffin. If something interlard the jae then it is soaring. If something interview the muffin then the muffin is xcvi. If something interview the muffin and it is xcvi then the muffin poll the jae. If something is soaring and it interlard the muffin then the muffin interlard the jae. If something is soaring then it interview the muffin. The muffin interview the muffin.", "logic": "\nInterlard(jae, muffin)\nInterview(muffin, jae)\nSoaring(muffin)\nforall x (Poll(x, muffin) -> Interview(x, jae))\nforall x (Interlard(x, jae) and Interlard(jae, muffin) -> Interview(muffin, jae))\nforall x (Interview(x, jae) -> Poll(jae, muffin))\nforall x (Interlard(x, jae) -> Soaring(x))\nforall x (Interview(x, muffin) -> Xcvi(muffin))\nforall x (Interview(x, muffin) and Xcvi(x) -> Poll(muffin, jae))\nforall x (Soaring(x) and Interlard(x, muffin) -> Interlard(muffin, jae))\nforall x (Soaring(x) -> Interview(x, muffin))\n\nInterview(muffin, muffin)\n\nSoaring(muffin) and forall x (Soaring(x) -> Interview(x, muffin)) -> therefore Interview(muffin, muffin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The sidonnie blue the carlita. The carlita bail the sidonnie. The carlita is decorous. If something clangour the carlita then it bail the sidonnie. If something blue the sidonnie and the sidonnie blue the carlita then the carlita bail the sidonnie. If something bail the sidonnie then the sidonnie clangour the carlita. If something blue the sidonnie then it is decorous. If something bail the carlita then the carlita is ferrous. If something bail the carlita and it is ferrous then the carlita clangour the sidonnie. If something is decorous and it blue the carlita then the carlita blue the sidonnie. If something is decorous then it bail the carlita. The sidonnie does not like the carlita.", "logic": "\nBlue(sidonnie, carlita)\nBail(carlita, sidonnie)\nDecorous(carlita)\nforall x (Clangour(x, carlita) -> Bail(x, sidonnie))\nforall x (Blue(x, sidonnie) and Blue(sidonnie, carlita) -> Bail(carlita, sidonnie))\nforall x (Bail(x, sidonnie) -> Clangour(sidonnie, carlita))\nforall x (Blue(x, sidonnie) -> Decorous(x))\nforall x (Bail(x, carlita) -> Ferrous(carlita))\nforall x (Bail(x, carlita) and Ferrous(x) -> Clangour(carlita, sidonnie))\nforall x (Decorous(x) and Blue(x, carlita) -> Blue(carlita, sidonnie))\nforall x (Decorous(x) -> Bail(x, carlita))\n\nnot Clangour(sidonnie, carlita)\n\nBail(carlita, sidonnie) and forall x (Bail(x, sidonnie) -> Clangour(sidonnie, carlita)) -> therefore Clangour(sidonnie, carlita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The adrian condole the bay. The bay ambuscade the adrian. The bay is isotropous. If something bourgeon the bay then it ambuscade the adrian. If something condole the adrian and the adrian condole the bay then the bay ambuscade the adrian. If something ambuscade the adrian then the adrian bourgeon the bay. If something condole the adrian then it is isotropous. If something ambuscade the bay then the bay is venomed. If something ambuscade the bay and it is venomed then the bay bourgeon the adrian. If something is isotropous and it condole the bay then the bay condole the adrian. If something is isotropous then it ambuscade the bay. The bay is venomed.", "logic": "\nCondole(adrian, bay)\nAmbuscade(bay, adrian)\nIsotropous(bay)\nforall x (Bourgeon(x, bay) -> Ambuscade(x, adrian))\nforall x (Condole(x, adrian) and Condole(adrian, bay) -> Ambuscade(bay, adrian))\nforall x (Ambuscade(x, adrian) -> Bourgeon(adrian, bay))\nforall x (Condole(x, adrian) -> Isotropous(x))\nforall x (Ambuscade(x, bay) -> Venomed(bay))\nforall x (Ambuscade(x, bay) and Venomed(x) -> Bourgeon(bay, adrian))\nforall x (Isotropous(x) and Condole(x, bay) -> Condole(bay, adrian))\nforall x (Isotropous(x) -> Ambuscade(x, bay))\n\nVenomed(bay)\n\nIsotropous(bay) and forall x (Isotropous(x) -> Ambuscade(x, bay)) -> therefore Ambuscade(bay, bay) Ambuscade(bay, bay) and forall x (Ambuscade(x, bay) -> Venomed(bay)) -> therefore Venomed(bay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The gertrude decant the nedi. The nedi press the gertrude. The nedi is illusory. If something effuse the nedi then it press the gertrude. If something decant the gertrude and the gertrude decant the nedi then the nedi press the gertrude. If something press the gertrude then the gertrude effuse the nedi. If something decant the gertrude then it is illusory. If something press the nedi then the nedi is warning. If something press the nedi and it is warning then the nedi effuse the gertrude. If something is illusory and it decant the nedi then the nedi decant the gertrude. If something is illusory then it press the nedi. The gertrude does not chase the gertrude.", "logic": "\nDecant(gertrude, nedi)\nPress(nedi, gertrude)\nIllusory(nedi)\nforall x (Effuse(x, nedi) -> Press(x, gertrude))\nforall x (Decant(x, gertrude) and Decant(gertrude, nedi) -> Press(nedi, gertrude))\nforall x (Press(x, gertrude) -> Effuse(gertrude, nedi))\nforall x (Decant(x, gertrude) -> Illusory(x))\nforall x (Press(x, nedi) -> Warning(nedi))\nforall x (Press(x, nedi) and Warning(x) -> Effuse(nedi, gertrude))\nforall x (Illusory(x) and Decant(x, nedi) -> Decant(nedi, gertrude))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Press(x, nedi))\n\nnot Press(gertrude, gertrude)\n\nPress(nedi, gertrude) and forall x (Press(x, gertrude) -> Effuse(gertrude, nedi)) -> therefore Effuse(gertrude, nedi) Effuse(gertrude, nedi) and forall x (Effuse(x, nedi) -> Press(x, gertrude)) -> therefore Press(gertrude, gertrude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The marris tick the delphina. The delphina mythicise the marris. The delphina is helical. If something configure the delphina then it mythicise the marris. If something tick the marris and the marris tick the delphina then the delphina mythicise the marris. If something mythicise the marris then the marris configure the delphina. If something tick the marris then it is helical. If something mythicise the delphina then the delphina is catalatic. If something mythicise the delphina and it is catalatic then the delphina configure the marris. If something is helical and it tick the delphina then the delphina tick the marris. If something is helical then it mythicise the delphina. The delphina configure the marris.", "logic": "\nTick(marris, delphina)\nMythicise(delphina, marris)\nHelical(delphina)\nforall x (Configure(x, delphina) -> Mythicise(x, marris))\nforall x (Tick(x, marris) and Tick(marris, delphina) -> Mythicise(delphina, marris))\nforall x (Mythicise(x, marris) -> Configure(marris, delphina))\nforall x (Tick(x, marris) -> Helical(x))\nforall x (Mythicise(x, delphina) -> Catalatic(delphina))\nforall x (Mythicise(x, delphina) and Catalatic(x) -> Configure(delphina, marris))\nforall x (Helical(x) and Tick(x, delphina) -> Tick(delphina, marris))\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Mythicise(x, delphina))\n\nConfigure(delphina, marris)\n\nHelical(delphina) and forall x (Helical(x) -> Mythicise(x, delphina)) -> therefore Mythicise(delphina, delphina) Helical(delphina) and forall x (Helical(x) -> Mythicise(x, delphina)) -> therefore Mythicise(delphina, delphina) Mythicise(delphina, delphina) and forall x (Mythicise(x, delphina) -> Catalatic(delphina)) -> therefore Catalatic(delphina) Mythicise(delphina, delphina) and Catalatic(delphina) and forall x (Mythicise(x, delphina) and Catalatic(x) -> Configure(delphina, marris)) -> therefore Configure(delphina, marris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The darwin relearn the joline. The joline agenise the darwin. The joline is ukrainian. If something extract the joline then it agenise the darwin. If something relearn the darwin and the darwin relearn the joline then the joline agenise the darwin. If something agenise the darwin then the darwin extract the joline. If something relearn the darwin then it is ukrainian. If something agenise the joline then the joline is homeric. If something agenise the joline and it is homeric then the joline extract the darwin. If something is ukrainian and it relearn the joline then the joline relearn the darwin. If something is ukrainian then it agenise the joline. The joline does not like the darwin.", "logic": "\nRelearn(darwin, joline)\nAgenise(joline, darwin)\nUkrainian(joline)\nforall x (Extract(x, joline) -> Agenise(x, darwin))\nforall x (Relearn(x, darwin) and Relearn(darwin, joline) -> Agenise(joline, darwin))\nforall x (Agenise(x, darwin) -> Extract(darwin, joline))\nforall x (Relearn(x, darwin) -> Ukrainian(x))\nforall x (Agenise(x, joline) -> Homeric(joline))\nforall x (Agenise(x, joline) and Homeric(x) -> Extract(joline, darwin))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) and Relearn(x, joline) -> Relearn(joline, darwin))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Agenise(x, joline))\n\nnot Extract(joline, darwin)\n\nUkrainian(joline) and forall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Agenise(x, joline)) -> therefore Agenise(joline, joline) Ukrainian(joline) and forall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Agenise(x, joline)) -> therefore Agenise(joline, joline) Agenise(joline, joline) and forall x (Agenise(x, joline) -> Homeric(joline)) -> therefore Homeric(joline) Agenise(joline, joline) and Homeric(joline) and forall x (Agenise(x, joline) and Homeric(x) -> Extract(joline, darwin)) -> therefore Extract(joline, darwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The bunnie coarsen the griffith. The griffith deluge the bunnie. The griffith is uneager. If something consume the griffith then it deluge the bunnie. If something coarsen the bunnie and the bunnie coarsen the griffith then the griffith deluge the bunnie. If something deluge the bunnie then the bunnie consume the griffith. If something coarsen the bunnie then it is uneager. If something deluge the griffith then the griffith is ravaging. If something deluge the griffith and it is ravaging then the griffith consume the bunnie. If something is uneager and it coarsen the griffith then the griffith coarsen the bunnie. If something is uneager then it deluge the griffith. The bunnie is not uneager.", "logic": "\nCoarsen(bunnie, griffith)\nDeluge(griffith, bunnie)\nUneager(griffith)\nforall x (Consume(x, griffith) -> Deluge(x, bunnie))\nforall x (Coarsen(x, bunnie) and Coarsen(bunnie, griffith) -> Deluge(griffith, bunnie))\nforall x (Deluge(x, bunnie) -> Consume(bunnie, griffith))\nforall x (Coarsen(x, bunnie) -> Uneager(x))\nforall x (Deluge(x, griffith) -> Ravaging(griffith))\nforall x (Deluge(x, griffith) and Ravaging(x) -> Consume(griffith, bunnie))\nforall x (Uneager(x) and Coarsen(x, griffith) -> Coarsen(griffith, bunnie))\nforall x (Uneager(x) -> Deluge(x, griffith))\n\nnot Uneager(bunnie)\n\nforall x (Coarsen(x, bunnie) -> Uneager(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The lora behoove the joelynn. The joelynn straddle the lora. The joelynn is salving. If something convene the joelynn then it straddle the lora. If something behoove the lora and the lora behoove the joelynn then the joelynn straddle the lora. If something straddle the lora then the lora convene the joelynn. If something behoove the lora then it is salving. If something straddle the joelynn then the joelynn is analyzable. If something straddle the joelynn and it is analyzable then the joelynn convene the lora. If something is salving and it behoove the joelynn then the joelynn behoove the lora. If something is salving then it straddle the joelynn. The joelynn behoove the lora.", "logic": "\nBehoove(lora, joelynn)\nStraddle(joelynn, lora)\nSalving(joelynn)\nforall x (Convene(x, joelynn) -> Straddle(x, lora))\nforall x (Behoove(x, lora) and Behoove(lora, joelynn) -> Straddle(joelynn, lora))\nforall x (Straddle(x, lora) -> Convene(lora, joelynn))\nforall x (Behoove(x, lora) -> Salving(x))\nforall x (Straddle(x, joelynn) -> Analyzable(joelynn))\nforall x (Straddle(x, joelynn) and Analyzable(x) -> Convene(joelynn, lora))\nforall x (Salving(x) and Behoove(x, joelynn) -> Behoove(joelynn, lora))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Straddle(x, joelynn))\n\nBehoove(joelynn, lora)\n\nforall x (Salving(x) and Behoove(x, joelynn) -> Behoove(joelynn, lora)) <- forall x (Behoove(x, lora) -> Salving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The keenan symmetrize the karola. The karola snag the keenan. The karola is misused. If something motorise the karola then it snag the keenan. If something symmetrize the keenan and the keenan symmetrize the karola then the karola snag the keenan. If something snag the keenan then the keenan motorise the karola. If something symmetrize the keenan then it is misused. If something snag the karola then the karola is misty. If something snag the karola and it is misty then the karola motorise the keenan. If something is misused and it symmetrize the karola then the karola symmetrize the keenan. If something is misused then it snag the karola. The keenan does not chase the karola.", "logic": "\nSymmetrize(keenan, karola)\nSnag(karola, keenan)\nMisused(karola)\nforall x (Motorise(x, karola) -> Snag(x, keenan))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, keenan) and Symmetrize(keenan, karola) -> Snag(karola, keenan))\nforall x (Snag(x, keenan) -> Motorise(keenan, karola))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, keenan) -> Misused(x))\nforall x (Snag(x, karola) -> Misty(karola))\nforall x (Snag(x, karola) and Misty(x) -> Motorise(karola, keenan))\nforall x (Misused(x) and Symmetrize(x, karola) -> Symmetrize(karola, keenan))\nforall x (Misused(x) -> Snag(x, karola))\n\nnot Snag(keenan, karola)\n\nforall x (Misused(x) -> Snag(x, karola)) <- forall x (Symmetrize(x, keenan) -> Misused(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The aub seethe the shandra. The shandra encrypt the aub. The shandra is vaulted. If something ream the shandra then it encrypt the aub. If something seethe the aub and the aub seethe the shandra then the shandra encrypt the aub. If something encrypt the aub then the aub ream the shandra. If something seethe the aub then it is vaulted. If something encrypt the shandra then the shandra is cuprous. If something encrypt the shandra and it is cuprous then the shandra ream the aub. If something is vaulted and it seethe the shandra then the shandra seethe the aub. If something is vaulted then it encrypt the shandra. The aub is rough.", "logic": "\nSeethe(aub, shandra)\nEncrypt(shandra, aub)\nVaulted(shandra)\nforall x (Ream(x, shandra) -> Encrypt(x, aub))\nforall x (Seethe(x, aub) and Seethe(aub, shandra) -> Encrypt(shandra, aub))\nforall x (Encrypt(x, aub) -> Ream(aub, shandra))\nforall x (Seethe(x, aub) -> Vaulted(x))\nforall x (Encrypt(x, shandra) -> Cuprous(shandra))\nforall x (Encrypt(x, shandra) and Cuprous(x) -> Ream(shandra, aub))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) and Seethe(x, shandra) -> Seethe(shandra, aub))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) -> Encrypt(x, shandra))\n\nRough(aub)\n\nRough(aub) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The arielle ejaculate the cynthia. The cynthia wrest the arielle. The cynthia is deist. If something repulse the cynthia then it wrest the arielle. If something ejaculate the arielle and the arielle ejaculate the cynthia then the cynthia wrest the arielle. If something wrest the arielle then the arielle repulse the cynthia. If something ejaculate the arielle then it is deist. If something wrest the cynthia then the cynthia is delighted. If something wrest the cynthia and it is delighted then the cynthia repulse the arielle. If something is deist and it ejaculate the cynthia then the cynthia ejaculate the arielle. If something is deist then it wrest the cynthia. The cynthia is not rough.", "logic": "\nEjaculate(arielle, cynthia)\nWrest(cynthia, arielle)\nDeist(cynthia)\nforall x (Repulse(x, cynthia) -> Wrest(x, arielle))\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, arielle) and Ejaculate(arielle, cynthia) -> Wrest(cynthia, arielle))\nforall x (Wrest(x, arielle) -> Repulse(arielle, cynthia))\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, arielle) -> Deist(x))\nforall x (Wrest(x, cynthia) -> Delighted(cynthia))\nforall x (Wrest(x, cynthia) and Delighted(x) -> Repulse(cynthia, arielle))\nforall x (Deist(x) and Ejaculate(x, cynthia) -> Ejaculate(cynthia, arielle))\nforall x (Deist(x) -> Wrest(x, cynthia))\n\nnot Rough(cynthia)\n\nnot Rough(cynthia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The nissa carry the bekki. The bekki foster the nissa. The bekki is unsavory. If something service the bekki then it foster the nissa. If something carry the nissa and the nissa carry the bekki then the bekki foster the nissa. If something foster the nissa then the nissa service the bekki. If something carry the nissa then it is unsavory. If something foster the bekki then the bekki is bionic. If something foster the bekki and it is bionic then the bekki service the nissa. If something is unsavory and it carry the bekki then the bekki carry the nissa. If something is unsavory then it foster the bekki. The nissa is bionic.", "logic": "\nCarry(nissa, bekki)\nFoster(bekki, nissa)\nUnsavory(bekki)\nforall x (Service(x, bekki) -> Foster(x, nissa))\nforall x (Carry(x, nissa) and Carry(nissa, bekki) -> Foster(bekki, nissa))\nforall x (Foster(x, nissa) -> Service(nissa, bekki))\nforall x (Carry(x, nissa) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Foster(x, bekki) -> Bionic(bekki))\nforall x (Foster(x, bekki) and Bionic(x) -> Service(bekki, nissa))\nforall x (Unsavory(x) and Carry(x, bekki) -> Carry(bekki, nissa))\nforall x (Unsavory(x) -> Foster(x, bekki))\n\nBionic(nissa)\n\nBionic(nissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The talia unravel the francisca. The francisca yacht the talia. The francisca is uncleared. If something stymy the francisca then it yacht the talia. If something unravel the talia and the talia unravel the francisca then the francisca yacht the talia. If something yacht the talia then the talia stymy the francisca. If something unravel the talia then it is uncleared. If something yacht the francisca then the francisca is donnish. If something yacht the francisca and it is donnish then the francisca stymy the talia. If something is uncleared and it unravel the francisca then the francisca unravel the talia. If something is uncleared then it yacht the francisca. The talia is not blue.", "logic": "\nUnravel(talia, francisca)\nYacht(francisca, talia)\nUncleared(francisca)\nforall x (Stymy(x, francisca) -> Yacht(x, talia))\nforall x (Unravel(x, talia) and Unravel(talia, francisca) -> Yacht(francisca, talia))\nforall x (Yacht(x, talia) -> Stymy(talia, francisca))\nforall x (Unravel(x, talia) -> Uncleared(x))\nforall x (Yacht(x, francisca) -> Donnish(francisca))\nforall x (Yacht(x, francisca) and Donnish(x) -> Stymy(francisca, talia))\nforall x (Uncleared(x) and Unravel(x, francisca) -> Unravel(francisca, talia))\nforall x (Uncleared(x) -> Yacht(x, francisca))\n\nnot Blue(talia)\n\nnot Blue(talia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The sturgis crumble the nissie. The nissie fart the sturgis. The nissie is fattening. If something foam the nissie then it fart the sturgis. If something crumble the sturgis and the sturgis crumble the nissie then the nissie fart the sturgis. If something fart the sturgis then the sturgis foam the nissie. If something crumble the sturgis then it is fattening. If something fart the nissie then the nissie is admittible. If something fart the nissie and it is admittible then the nissie foam the sturgis. If something is fattening and it crumble the nissie then the nissie crumble the sturgis. If something is fattening then it fart the nissie. The nissie crumble the nissie.", "logic": "\nCrumble(sturgis, nissie)\nFart(nissie, sturgis)\nFattening(nissie)\nforall x (Foam(x, nissie) -> Fart(x, sturgis))\nforall x (Crumble(x, sturgis) and Crumble(sturgis, nissie) -> Fart(nissie, sturgis))\nforall x (Fart(x, sturgis) -> Foam(sturgis, nissie))\nforall x (Crumble(x, sturgis) -> Fattening(x))\nforall x (Fart(x, nissie) -> Admittible(nissie))\nforall x (Fart(x, nissie) and Admittible(x) -> Foam(nissie, sturgis))\nforall x (Fattening(x) and Crumble(x, nissie) -> Crumble(nissie, sturgis))\nforall x (Fattening(x) -> Fart(x, nissie))\n\nCrumble(nissie, nissie)\n\nCrumble(nissie, nissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "Ozzy is bored. Ozzy is authentic. Ozzy is ginger. If Ozzy is bigoted then Ozzy is bored. If someone is bored then they are unmolested. All umteen, ventricose people are bigoted. If Ozzy is bored then Ozzy is umteen. All authentic people are unmolested. All ventricose people are umteen. Smart people are bored. If Ozzy is unmolested and Ozzy is umteen then Ozzy is ventricose. Ozzy is authentic.", "logic": "\nBored(ozzy)\nAuthentic(ozzy)\nGinger(ozzy)\nBigoted(ozzy) -> Bored(ozzy)\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nforall x (Umteen(x) and Ventricose(x) -> Bigoted(x))\nBored(ozzy) -> Umteen(ozzy)\nforall x (Authentic(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nforall x (Ventricose(x) -> Umteen(x))\nforall x (Bigoted(x) -> Bored(x))\nUnmolested(ozzy) and Umteen(ozzy) -> Ventricose(ozzy)\n\nAuthentic(ozzy)\n\ntherefore Authentic(ozzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Stanly is alary. Stanly is hindermost. Stanly is vicarious. If Stanly is advisory then Stanly is alary. If someone is alary then they are right. All atilt, misbranded people are advisory. If Stanly is alary then Stanly is atilt. All hindermost people are right. All misbranded people are atilt. Smart people are alary. If Stanly is right and Stanly is atilt then Stanly is misbranded. Stanly is not hindermost.", "logic": "\nAlary(stanly)\nHindermost(stanly)\nVicarious(stanly)\nAdvisory(stanly) -> Alary(stanly)\nforall x (Alary(x) -> Right(x))\nforall x (Atilt(x) and Misbranded(x) -> Advisory(x))\nAlary(stanly) -> Atilt(stanly)\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Right(x))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) -> Atilt(x))\nforall x (Advisory(x) -> Alary(x))\nRight(stanly) and Atilt(stanly) -> Misbranded(stanly)\n\nnot Hindermost(stanly)\n\ntherefore Hindermost(stanly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Roberta is miraculous. Roberta is pendent. Roberta is assaultive. If Roberta is pupal then Roberta is miraculous. If someone is miraculous then they are shelvy. All shamed, confining people are pupal. If Roberta is miraculous then Roberta is shamed. All pendent people are shelvy. All confining people are shamed. Smart people are miraculous. If Roberta is shelvy and Roberta is shamed then Roberta is confining. Roberta is shamed.", "logic": "\nMiraculous(roberta)\nPendent(roberta)\nAssaultive(roberta)\nPupal(roberta) -> Miraculous(roberta)\nforall x (Miraculous(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Shamed(x) and Confining(x) -> Pupal(x))\nMiraculous(roberta) -> Shamed(roberta)\nforall x (Pendent(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Confining(x) -> Shamed(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nShelvy(roberta) and Shamed(roberta) -> Confining(roberta)\n\nShamed(roberta)\n\nMiraculous(roberta) and Miraculous(roberta) -> Shamed(roberta) -> therefore Shamed(roberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Arturo is unsubtle. Arturo is ghoulish. Arturo is broadnosed. If Arturo is civilized then Arturo is unsubtle. If someone is unsubtle then they are judicious. All distal, shadowy people are civilized. If Arturo is unsubtle then Arturo is distal. All ghoulish people are judicious. All shadowy people are distal. Smart people are unsubtle. If Arturo is judicious and Arturo is distal then Arturo is shadowy. Arturo is not distal.", "logic": "\nUnsubtle(arturo)\nGhoulish(arturo)\nBroadnosed(arturo)\nCivilized(arturo) -> Unsubtle(arturo)\nforall x (Unsubtle(x) -> Judicious(x))\nforall x (Distal(x) and Shadowy(x) -> Civilized(x))\nUnsubtle(arturo) -> Distal(arturo)\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Judicious(x))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Distal(x))\nforall x (Civilized(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\nJudicious(arturo) and Distal(arturo) -> Shadowy(arturo)\n\nnot Distal(arturo)\n\nUnsubtle(arturo) and Unsubtle(arturo) -> Distal(arturo) -> therefore Distal(arturo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Kourtney is unbleached. Kourtney is predacious. Kourtney is eviscerate. If Kourtney is uncolored then Kourtney is unbleached. If someone is unbleached then they are lumpish. All directing, swinging people are uncolored. If Kourtney is unbleached then Kourtney is directing. All predacious people are lumpish. All swinging people are directing. Smart people are unbleached. If Kourtney is lumpish and Kourtney is directing then Kourtney is swinging. Kourtney is swinging.", "logic": "\nUnbleached(kourtney)\nPredacious(kourtney)\nEviscerate(kourtney)\nUncolored(kourtney) -> Unbleached(kourtney)\nforall x (Unbleached(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Directing(x) and Swinging(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nUnbleached(kourtney) -> Directing(kourtney)\nforall x (Predacious(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Swinging(x) -> Directing(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Unbleached(x))\nLumpish(kourtney) and Directing(kourtney) -> Swinging(kourtney)\n\nSwinging(kourtney)\n\nUnbleached(kourtney) and forall x (Unbleached(x) -> Lumpish(x)) -> therefore Lumpish(kourtney) Unbleached(kourtney) and Unbleached(kourtney) -> Directing(kourtney) -> therefore Directing(kourtney) Lumpish(kourtney) and Directing(kourtney) and Lumpish(kourtney) and Directing(kourtney) -> Swinging(kourtney) -> therefore Swinging(kourtney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Goldina is chartered. Goldina is sulphurous. Goldina is lonely. If Goldina is adaptative then Goldina is chartered. If someone is chartered then they are remarkable. All prolate, magnetised people are adaptative. If Goldina is chartered then Goldina is prolate. All sulphurous people are remarkable. All magnetised people are prolate. Smart people are chartered. If Goldina is remarkable and Goldina is prolate then Goldina is magnetised. Goldina is not magnetised.", "logic": "\nChartered(goldina)\nSulphurous(goldina)\nLonely(goldina)\nAdaptative(goldina) -> Chartered(goldina)\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Prolate(x) and Magnetised(x) -> Adaptative(x))\nChartered(goldina) -> Prolate(goldina)\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) -> Prolate(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Chartered(x))\nRemarkable(goldina) and Prolate(goldina) -> Magnetised(goldina)\n\nnot Magnetised(goldina)\n\nChartered(goldina) and forall x (Chartered(x) -> Remarkable(x)) -> therefore Remarkable(goldina) Chartered(goldina) and Chartered(goldina) -> Prolate(goldina) -> therefore Prolate(goldina) Remarkable(goldina) and Prolate(goldina) and Remarkable(goldina) and Prolate(goldina) -> Magnetised(goldina) -> therefore Magnetised(goldina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Pascal is pronounced. Pascal is blunt. Pascal is blustering. If Pascal is obovate then Pascal is pronounced. If someone is pronounced then they are valueless. All baffled, gauzy people are obovate. If Pascal is pronounced then Pascal is baffled. All blunt people are valueless. All gauzy people are baffled. Smart people are pronounced. If Pascal is valueless and Pascal is baffled then Pascal is gauzy. Pascal is obovate.", "logic": "\nPronounced(pascal)\nBlunt(pascal)\nBlustering(pascal)\nObovate(pascal) -> Pronounced(pascal)\nforall x (Pronounced(x) -> Valueless(x))\nforall x (Baffled(x) and Gauzy(x) -> Obovate(x))\nPronounced(pascal) -> Baffled(pascal)\nforall x (Blunt(x) -> Valueless(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Baffled(x))\nforall x (Obovate(x) -> Pronounced(x))\nValueless(pascal) and Baffled(pascal) -> Gauzy(pascal)\n\nObovate(pascal)\n\nPronounced(pascal) and Pronounced(pascal) -> Baffled(pascal) -> therefore Baffled(pascal) Pronounced(pascal) and forall x (Pronounced(x) -> Valueless(x)) -> therefore Valueless(pascal) Pronounced(pascal) and Pronounced(pascal) -> Baffled(pascal) -> therefore Baffled(pascal) Valueless(pascal) and Baffled(pascal) and Valueless(pascal) and Baffled(pascal) -> Gauzy(pascal) -> therefore Gauzy(pascal) Baffled(pascal) and Gauzy(pascal) and forall x (Baffled(x) and Gauzy(x) -> Obovate(x)) -> therefore Obovate(pascal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "George is concerted. George is miry. George is loverlike. If George is glowing then George is concerted. If someone is concerted then they are homocercal. All parthian, thrillful people are glowing. If George is concerted then George is parthian. All miry people are homocercal. All thrillful people are parthian. Smart people are concerted. If George is homocercal and George is parthian then George is thrillful. George is not glowing.", "logic": "\nConcerted(george)\nMiry(george)\nLoverlike(george)\nGlowing(george) -> Concerted(george)\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Parthian(x) and Thrillful(x) -> Glowing(x))\nConcerted(george) -> Parthian(george)\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Parthian(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Concerted(x))\nHomocercal(george) and Parthian(george) -> Thrillful(george)\n\nnot Glowing(george)\n\nConcerted(george) and Concerted(george) -> Parthian(george) -> therefore Parthian(george) Concerted(george) and forall x (Concerted(x) -> Homocercal(x)) -> therefore Homocercal(george) Concerted(george) and Concerted(george) -> Parthian(george) -> therefore Parthian(george) Homocercal(george) and Parthian(george) and Homocercal(george) and Parthian(george) -> Thrillful(george) -> therefore Thrillful(george) Parthian(george) and Thrillful(george) and forall x (Parthian(x) and Thrillful(x) -> Glowing(x)) -> therefore Glowing(george)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Efram is crosswise. Jacki is crosswise. Jacki is nurtural. Jacki is eurafrican. Lurette is crosswise. Lurette is nurtural. Jennee is nurtural. All austral, crosswise people are smashing. All eurafrican people are nurtural. All clamant, austral people are crosswise. All crosswise, filmable people are austral. All smashing, crosswise people are clamant. All nurtural people are austral. Jennee is nurtural.", "logic": "\nCrosswise(efram)\nCrosswise(jacki)\nNurtural(jacki)\nEurafrican(jacki)\nCrosswise(lurette)\nNurtural(lurette)\nNurtural(jennee)\nforall x (Austral(x) and Crosswise(x) -> Smashing(x))\nforall x (Eurafrican(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Clamant(x) and Austral(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Crosswise(x) and Filmable(x) -> Austral(x))\nforall x (Smashing(x) and Crosswise(x) -> Clamant(x))\nforall x (Nurtural(x) -> Austral(x))\n\nNurtural(jennee)\n\ntherefore Nurtural(jennee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Arlen is hydroxy. Sella is hydroxy. Sella is preferred. Sella is invitatory. Kiah is hydroxy. Kiah is preferred. Wilburn is preferred. All cervical, hydroxy people are snowbound. All invitatory people are preferred. All opaque, cervical people are hydroxy. All hydroxy, nigerien people are cervical. All snowbound, hydroxy people are opaque. All preferred people are cervical. Sella is not hydroxy.", "logic": "\nHydroxy(arlen)\nHydroxy(sella)\nPreferred(sella)\nInvitatory(sella)\nHydroxy(kiah)\nPreferred(kiah)\nPreferred(wilburn)\nforall x (Cervical(x) and Hydroxy(x) -> Snowbound(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Preferred(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) and Cervical(x) -> Hydroxy(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) and Nigerien(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Snowbound(x) and Hydroxy(x) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Preferred(x) -> Cervical(x))\n\nnot Hydroxy(sella)\n\ntherefore Hydroxy(sella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Brian is dreadful. Joice is dreadful. Joice is hempen. Joice is dilute. Erhart is dreadful. Erhart is hempen. Phineas is hempen. All antithetic, dreadful people are excitatory. All dilute people are hempen. All elastic, antithetic people are dreadful. All dreadful, perverse people are antithetic. All excitatory, dreadful people are elastic. All hempen people are antithetic. Joice is antithetic.", "logic": "\nDreadful(brian)\nDreadful(joice)\nHempen(joice)\nDilute(joice)\nDreadful(erhart)\nHempen(erhart)\nHempen(phineas)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) and Dreadful(x) -> Excitatory(x))\nforall x (Dilute(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) and Antithetic(x) -> Dreadful(x))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) and Perverse(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Excitatory(x) and Dreadful(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Antithetic(x))\n\nAntithetic(joice)\n\nHempen(joice) and forall x (Hempen(x) -> Antithetic(x)) -> therefore Antithetic(joice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Aggy is dense. Carena is dense. Carena is fisheye. Carena is filthy. Merill is dense. Merill is fisheye. Kincaid is fisheye. All thorough, dense people are parky. All filthy people are fisheye. All sporadic, thorough people are dense. All dense, foliated people are thorough. All parky, dense people are sporadic. All fisheye people are thorough. Carena is not thorough.", "logic": "\nDense(aggy)\nDense(carena)\nFisheye(carena)\nFilthy(carena)\nDense(merill)\nFisheye(merill)\nFisheye(kincaid)\nforall x (Thorough(x) and Dense(x) -> Parky(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) and Thorough(x) -> Dense(x))\nforall x (Dense(x) and Foliated(x) -> Thorough(x))\nforall x (Parky(x) and Dense(x) -> Sporadic(x))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Thorough(x))\n\nnot Thorough(carena)\n\nFisheye(carena) and forall x (Fisheye(x) -> Thorough(x)) -> therefore Thorough(carena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Florie is strident. Irvine is strident. Irvine is fuzzed. Irvine is direct. Othilie is strident. Othilie is fuzzed. Hilliary is fuzzed. All nourished, strident people are surviving. All direct people are fuzzed. All sublunary, nourished people are strident. All strident, expendable people are nourished. All surviving, strident people are sublunary. All fuzzed people are nourished. Othilie is surviving.", "logic": "\nStrident(florie)\nStrident(irvine)\nFuzzed(irvine)\nDirect(irvine)\nStrident(othilie)\nFuzzed(othilie)\nFuzzed(hilliary)\nforall x (Nourished(x) and Strident(x) -> Surviving(x))\nforall x (Direct(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) and Nourished(x) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) and Expendable(x) -> Nourished(x))\nforall x (Surviving(x) and Strident(x) -> Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Nourished(x))\n\nSurviving(othilie)\n\nFuzzed(othilie) and forall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Nourished(x)) -> therefore Nourished(othilie) Nourished(othilie) and Strident(othilie) and forall x (Nourished(x) and Strident(x) -> Surviving(x)) -> therefore Surviving(othilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Renate is bigmouthed. Conrad is bigmouthed. Conrad is sulphuric. Conrad is seventy. Duffy is bigmouthed. Duffy is sulphuric. Carissa is sulphuric. All fishy, bigmouthed people are isolating. All seventy people are sulphuric. All broad, fishy people are bigmouthed. All bigmouthed, myocardial people are fishy. All isolating, bigmouthed people are broad. All sulphuric people are fishy. Conrad is not isolating.", "logic": "\nBigmouthed(renate)\nBigmouthed(conrad)\nSulphuric(conrad)\nSeventy(conrad)\nBigmouthed(duffy)\nSulphuric(duffy)\nSulphuric(carissa)\nforall x (Fishy(x) and Bigmouthed(x) -> Isolating(x))\nforall x (Seventy(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) and Fishy(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) and Myocardial(x) -> Fishy(x))\nforall x (Isolating(x) and Bigmouthed(x) -> Broad(x))\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Fishy(x))\n\nnot Isolating(conrad)\n\nSulphuric(conrad) and forall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Fishy(x)) -> therefore Fishy(conrad) Fishy(conrad) and Bigmouthed(conrad) and forall x (Fishy(x) and Bigmouthed(x) -> Isolating(x)) -> therefore Isolating(conrad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Jilly is umteenth. Linda is umteenth. Linda is afire. Linda is modal. Kimmy is umteenth. Kimmy is afire. Goldi is afire. All puritanic, umteenth people are cloisonne. All modal people are afire. All sharp, puritanic people are umteenth. All umteenth, totemic people are puritanic. All cloisonne, umteenth people are sharp. All afire people are puritanic. Linda is sharp.", "logic": "\nUmteenth(jilly)\nUmteenth(linda)\nAfire(linda)\nModal(linda)\nUmteenth(kimmy)\nAfire(kimmy)\nAfire(goldi)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) and Umteenth(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\nforall x (Modal(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) and Puritanic(x) -> Umteenth(x))\nforall x (Umteenth(x) and Totemic(x) -> Puritanic(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) and Umteenth(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Puritanic(x))\n\nSharp(linda)\n\nAfire(linda) and forall x (Afire(x) -> Puritanic(x)) -> therefore Puritanic(linda) Puritanic(linda) and Umteenth(linda) and forall x (Puritanic(x) and Umteenth(x) -> Cloisonne(x)) -> therefore Cloisonne(linda) Cloisonne(linda) and Umteenth(linda) and forall x (Cloisonne(x) and Umteenth(x) -> Sharp(x)) -> therefore Sharp(linda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Konrad is sloppy. Loraine is sloppy. Loraine is pauline. Loraine is acaudate. Clair is sloppy. Clair is pauline. Ericha is pauline. All upstair, sloppy people are vagile. All acaudate people are pauline. All disguised, upstair people are sloppy. All sloppy, subscribed people are upstair. All vagile, sloppy people are disguised. All pauline people are upstair. Clair is not disguised.", "logic": "\nSloppy(konrad)\nSloppy(loraine)\nPauline(loraine)\nAcaudate(loraine)\nSloppy(clair)\nPauline(clair)\nPauline(ericha)\nforall x (Upstair(x) and Sloppy(x) -> Vagile(x))\nforall x (Acaudate(x) -> Pauline(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and Upstair(x) -> Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Sloppy(x) and Subscribed(x) -> Upstair(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) and Sloppy(x) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Pauline(x) -> Upstair(x))\n\nnot Disguised(clair)\n\nPauline(clair) and forall x (Pauline(x) -> Upstair(x)) -> therefore Upstair(clair) Upstair(clair) and Sloppy(clair) and forall x (Upstair(x) and Sloppy(x) -> Vagile(x)) -> therefore Vagile(clair) Vagile(clair) and Sloppy(clair) and forall x (Vagile(x) and Sloppy(x) -> Disguised(x)) -> therefore Disguised(clair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Doralin is awakened. Isahella is awakened. Isahella is sober. Isahella is lawful. Raine is awakened. Raine is sober. Ariadne is sober. All catoptric, awakened people are referent. All lawful people are sober. All risky, catoptric people are awakened. All awakened, patent people are catoptric. All referent, awakened people are risky. All sober people are catoptric. Ariadne is not referent.", "logic": "\nAwakened(doralin)\nAwakened(isahella)\nSober(isahella)\nLawful(isahella)\nAwakened(raine)\nSober(raine)\nSober(ariadne)\nforall x (Catoptric(x) and Awakened(x) -> Referent(x))\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> Sober(x))\nforall x (Risky(x) and Catoptric(x) -> Awakened(x))\nforall x (Awakened(x) and Patent(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) and Awakened(x) -> Risky(x))\nforall x (Sober(x) -> Catoptric(x))\n\nnot Referent(ariadne)\n\nforall x (Catoptric(x) and Awakened(x) -> Referent(x)) <- forall x (Risky(x) and Catoptric(x) -> Awakened(x)) <- forall x (Referent(x) and Awakened(x) -> Risky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Trudy is inhibitory. Chet is inhibitory. Chet is sensate. Chet is derisory. Blake is inhibitory. Blake is sensate. Adriaens is sensate. All fanlike, inhibitory people are southmost. All derisory people are sensate. All hardbacked, fanlike people are inhibitory. All inhibitory, disquieted people are fanlike. All southmost, inhibitory people are hardbacked. All sensate people are fanlike. Trudy is hardbacked.", "logic": "\nInhibitory(trudy)\nInhibitory(chet)\nSensate(chet)\nDerisory(chet)\nInhibitory(blake)\nSensate(blake)\nSensate(adriaens)\nforall x (Fanlike(x) and Inhibitory(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Derisory(x) -> Sensate(x))\nforall x (Hardbacked(x) and Fanlike(x) -> Inhibitory(x))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) and Disquieted(x) -> Fanlike(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) and Inhibitory(x) -> Hardbacked(x))\nforall x (Sensate(x) -> Fanlike(x))\n\nHardbacked(trudy)\n\nforall x (Southmost(x) and Inhibitory(x) -> Hardbacked(x)) <- forall x (Fanlike(x) and Inhibitory(x) -> Southmost(x)) <- forall x (Sensate(x) -> Fanlike(x)) <- forall x (Derisory(x) -> Sensate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Hetty is livid. Aleecia is livid. Aleecia is marital. Aleecia is remiss. Alameda is livid. Alameda is marital. Beret is marital. All hardfisted, livid people are ugandan. All remiss people are marital. All discarded, hardfisted people are livid. All livid, bacterioid people are hardfisted. All ugandan, livid people are discarded. All marital people are hardfisted. Beret is not discarded.", "logic": "\nLivid(hetty)\nLivid(aleecia)\nMarital(aleecia)\nRemiss(aleecia)\nLivid(alameda)\nMarital(alameda)\nMarital(beret)\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) and Livid(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nforall x (Remiss(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Discarded(x) and Hardfisted(x) -> Livid(x))\nforall x (Livid(x) and Bacterioid(x) -> Hardfisted(x))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) and Livid(x) -> Discarded(x))\nforall x (Marital(x) -> Hardfisted(x))\n\nnot Discarded(beret)\n\nforall x (Ugandan(x) and Livid(x) -> Discarded(x)) <- forall x (Discarded(x) and Hardfisted(x) -> Livid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Juliana is potent. Barty is potent. Barty is cutaneal. Barty is aneroid. Elicia is potent. Elicia is cutaneal. Nicoline is cutaneal. All civic, potent people are earthly. All aneroid people are cutaneal. All treelike, civic people are potent. All potent, anthropic people are civic. All earthly, potent people are treelike. All cutaneal people are civic. Juliana is cutaneal.", "logic": "\nPotent(juliana)\nPotent(barty)\nCutaneal(barty)\nAneroid(barty)\nPotent(elicia)\nCutaneal(elicia)\nCutaneal(nicoline)\nforall x (Civic(x) and Potent(x) -> Earthly(x))\nforall x (Aneroid(x) -> Cutaneal(x))\nforall x (Treelike(x) and Civic(x) -> Potent(x))\nforall x (Potent(x) and Anthropic(x) -> Civic(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) and Potent(x) -> Treelike(x))\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) -> Civic(x))\n\nCutaneal(juliana)\n\nforall x (Aneroid(x) -> Cutaneal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Mayer is allophonic. Vivienne is allophonic. Vivienne is deplorable. Vivienne is excitable. Karalynn is allophonic. Karalynn is deplorable. Corey is deplorable. All didactical, allophonic people are textile. All excitable people are deplorable. All rebellious, didactical people are allophonic. All allophonic, perforated people are didactical. All textile, allophonic people are rebellious. All deplorable people are didactical. Karalynn is not excitable.", "logic": "\nAllophonic(mayer)\nAllophonic(vivienne)\nDeplorable(vivienne)\nExcitable(vivienne)\nAllophonic(karalynn)\nDeplorable(karalynn)\nDeplorable(corey)\nforall x (Didactical(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Textile(x))\nforall x (Excitable(x) -> Deplorable(x))\nforall x (Rebellious(x) and Didactical(x) -> Allophonic(x))\nforall x (Allophonic(x) and Perforated(x) -> Didactical(x))\nforall x (Textile(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Rebellious(x))\nforall x (Deplorable(x) -> Didactical(x))\n\nnot Excitable(karalynn)\n\nnot Excitable(karalynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Kathi is acaudate. Andi is acaudate. Andi is immunised. Andi is piano. Rosalie is acaudate. Rosalie is immunised. Feodora is immunised. All masonic, acaudate people are unheeding. All piano people are immunised. All ratified, masonic people are acaudate. All acaudate, appointive people are masonic. All unheeding, acaudate people are ratified. All immunised people are masonic. Rosalie is appointive.", "logic": "\nAcaudate(kathi)\nAcaudate(andi)\nImmunised(andi)\nPiano(andi)\nAcaudate(rosalie)\nImmunised(rosalie)\nImmunised(feodora)\nforall x (Masonic(x) and Acaudate(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Piano(x) -> Immunised(x))\nforall x (Ratified(x) and Masonic(x) -> Acaudate(x))\nforall x (Acaudate(x) and Appointive(x) -> Masonic(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) and Acaudate(x) -> Ratified(x))\nforall x (Immunised(x) -> Masonic(x))\n\nAppointive(rosalie)\n\nAppointive(rosalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Shari is filmable. Spenser is filmable. Spenser is shingly. Spenser is wrapped. Vail is filmable. Vail is shingly. Paco is shingly. All professed, filmable people are preferent. All wrapped people are shingly. All dualistic, professed people are filmable. All filmable, syncretic people are professed. All preferent, filmable people are dualistic. All shingly people are professed. Shari is not wrapped.", "logic": "\nFilmable(shari)\nFilmable(spenser)\nShingly(spenser)\nWrapped(spenser)\nFilmable(vail)\nShingly(vail)\nShingly(paco)\nforall x (Professed(x) and Filmable(x) -> Preferent(x))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) -> Shingly(x))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) and Professed(x) -> Filmable(x))\nforall x (Filmable(x) and Syncretic(x) -> Professed(x))\nforall x (Preferent(x) and Filmable(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Professed(x))\n\nnot Wrapped(shari)\n\nnot Wrapped(shari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Merrilee is slurred. Valerye is slurred. Valerye is seventeen. Valerye is academic. Ole is slurred. Ole is seventeen. Devonne is seventeen. All amniotic, slurred people are knavish. All academic people are seventeen. All platelike, amniotic people are slurred. All slurred, colorfast people are amniotic. All knavish, slurred people are platelike. All seventeen people are amniotic. Devonne is colorfast.", "logic": "\nSlurred(merrilee)\nSlurred(valerye)\nSeventeen(valerye)\nAcademic(valerye)\nSlurred(ole)\nSeventeen(ole)\nSeventeen(devonne)\nforall x (Amniotic(x) and Slurred(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Academic(x) -> Seventeen(x))\nforall x (Platelike(x) and Amniotic(x) -> Slurred(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) and Colorfast(x) -> Amniotic(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) and Slurred(x) -> Platelike(x))\nforall x (Seventeen(x) -> Amniotic(x))\n\nColorfast(devonne)\n\nColorfast(devonne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "The leonidas bench the louis. The leonidas is not blemished. The leonidas is tottery. The leonidas is not faultless. The leonidas is not olive. The leonidas is not judgmental. The leonidas travesty the louis. The leonidas does not need the louis. The louis bench the leonidas. The louis is blemished. The louis does not like the leonidas. The louis does not need the leonidas. If something travesty the louis then it bench the louis. If something travesty the louis then the louis is tottery. If something is tottery then it travesty the louis. If something is blemished then it does not need the louis. If the leonidas winterise the louis then the louis bench the leonidas. If the louis travesty the leonidas and the leonidas bench the louis then the leonidas travesty the louis. If the louis travesty the leonidas then the louis is not blemished. If the louis winterise the leonidas and the leonidas does not chase the louis then the louis is faultless. The louis bench the leonidas.", "logic": "\nBench(leonidas, louis)\nnot Blemished(leonidas)\nTottery(leonidas)\nnot Faultless(leonidas)\nnot Olive(leonidas)\nnot Judgmental(leonidas)\nTravesty(leonidas, louis)\nnot Winterise(leonidas, louis)\nBench(louis, leonidas)\nBlemished(louis)\nnot Travesty(louis, leonidas)\nnot Winterise(louis, leonidas)\nforall x (Travesty(x, louis) -> Bench(x, louis))\nforall x (Travesty(x, louis) -> Tottery(louis))\nforall x (Tottery(x) -> Travesty(x, louis))\nforall x (Blemished(x) -> not Winterise(x, louis))\nWinterise(leonidas, louis) -> Bench(louis, leonidas)\nTravesty(louis, leonidas) and Bench(leonidas, louis) -> Travesty(leonidas, louis)\nTravesty(louis, leonidas) -> not Blemished(louis)\nWinterise(louis, leonidas) and not Bench(leonidas, louis) -> Faultless(louis)\n\nBench(louis, leonidas)\n\ntherefore Bench(louis, leonidas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The alyse brown the rudy. The alyse is not norman. The alyse is amygdaline. The alyse is not acanthoid. The alyse is not existing. The alyse is not specular. The alyse resolve the rudy. The alyse does not need the rudy. The rudy brown the alyse. The rudy is norman. The rudy does not like the alyse. The rudy does not need the alyse. If something resolve the rudy then it brown the rudy. If something resolve the rudy then the rudy is amygdaline. If something is amygdaline then it resolve the rudy. If something is norman then it does not need the rudy. If the alyse strive the rudy then the rudy brown the alyse. If the rudy resolve the alyse and the alyse brown the rudy then the alyse resolve the rudy. If the rudy resolve the alyse then the rudy is not norman. If the rudy strive the alyse and the alyse does not chase the rudy then the rudy is acanthoid. The rudy does not chase the alyse.", "logic": "\nBrown(alyse, rudy)\nnot Norman(alyse)\nAmygdaline(alyse)\nnot Acanthoid(alyse)\nnot Existing(alyse)\nnot Specular(alyse)\nResolve(alyse, rudy)\nnot Strive(alyse, rudy)\nBrown(rudy, alyse)\nNorman(rudy)\nnot Resolve(rudy, alyse)\nnot Strive(rudy, alyse)\nforall x (Resolve(x, rudy) -> Brown(x, rudy))\nforall x (Resolve(x, rudy) -> Amygdaline(rudy))\nforall x (Amygdaline(x) -> Resolve(x, rudy))\nforall x (Norman(x) -> not Strive(x, rudy))\nStrive(alyse, rudy) -> Brown(rudy, alyse)\nResolve(rudy, alyse) and Brown(alyse, rudy) -> Resolve(alyse, rudy)\nResolve(rudy, alyse) -> not Norman(rudy)\nStrive(rudy, alyse) and not Brown(alyse, rudy) -> Acanthoid(rudy)\n\nnot Brown(rudy, alyse)\n\ntherefore Brown(rudy, alyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The clarette bastardize the mitchell. The clarette is not monogynic. The clarette is korean. The clarette is not toughened. The clarette is not mutable. The clarette is not desecrated. The clarette macerate the mitchell. The clarette does not need the mitchell. The mitchell bastardize the clarette. The mitchell is monogynic. The mitchell does not like the clarette. The mitchell does not need the clarette. If something macerate the mitchell then it bastardize the mitchell. If something macerate the mitchell then the mitchell is korean. If something is korean then it macerate the mitchell. If something is monogynic then it does not need the mitchell. If the clarette misplace the mitchell then the mitchell bastardize the clarette. If the mitchell macerate the clarette and the clarette bastardize the mitchell then the clarette macerate the mitchell. If the mitchell macerate the clarette then the mitchell is not monogynic. If the mitchell misplace the clarette and the clarette does not chase the mitchell then the mitchell is toughened. The mitchell does not need the mitchell.", "logic": "\nBastardize(clarette, mitchell)\nnot Monogynic(clarette)\nKorean(clarette)\nnot Toughened(clarette)\nnot Mutable(clarette)\nnot Desecrated(clarette)\nMacerate(clarette, mitchell)\nnot Misplace(clarette, mitchell)\nBastardize(mitchell, clarette)\nMonogynic(mitchell)\nnot Macerate(mitchell, clarette)\nnot Misplace(mitchell, clarette)\nforall x (Macerate(x, mitchell) -> Bastardize(x, mitchell))\nforall x (Macerate(x, mitchell) -> Korean(mitchell))\nforall x (Korean(x) -> Macerate(x, mitchell))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) -> not Misplace(x, mitchell))\nMisplace(clarette, mitchell) -> Bastardize(mitchell, clarette)\nMacerate(mitchell, clarette) and Bastardize(clarette, mitchell) -> Macerate(clarette, mitchell)\nMacerate(mitchell, clarette) -> not Monogynic(mitchell)\nMisplace(mitchell, clarette) and not Bastardize(clarette, mitchell) -> Toughened(mitchell)\n\nnot Misplace(mitchell, mitchell)\n\nMonogynic(mitchell) and forall x (Monogynic(x) -> not Misplace(x, mitchell)) -> therefore not Misplace(mitchell, mitchell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The xylia tinker the rebeka. The xylia is not pencilled. The xylia is cruciate. The xylia is not soiled. The xylia is not grumous. The xylia is not nonionic. The xylia strafe the rebeka. The xylia does not need the rebeka. The rebeka tinker the xylia. The rebeka is pencilled. The rebeka does not like the xylia. The rebeka does not need the xylia. If something strafe the rebeka then it tinker the rebeka. If something strafe the rebeka then the rebeka is cruciate. If something is cruciate then it strafe the rebeka. If something is pencilled then it does not need the rebeka. If the xylia blow the rebeka then the rebeka tinker the xylia. If the rebeka strafe the xylia and the xylia tinker the rebeka then the xylia strafe the rebeka. If the rebeka strafe the xylia then the rebeka is not pencilled. If the rebeka blow the xylia and the xylia does not chase the rebeka then the rebeka is soiled. The rebeka is not cruciate.", "logic": "\nTinker(xylia, rebeka)\nnot Pencilled(xylia)\nCruciate(xylia)\nnot Soiled(xylia)\nnot Grumous(xylia)\nnot Nonionic(xylia)\nStrafe(xylia, rebeka)\nnot Blow(xylia, rebeka)\nTinker(rebeka, xylia)\nPencilled(rebeka)\nnot Strafe(rebeka, xylia)\nnot Blow(rebeka, xylia)\nforall x (Strafe(x, rebeka) -> Tinker(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Strafe(x, rebeka) -> Cruciate(rebeka))\nforall x (Cruciate(x) -> Strafe(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Pencilled(x) -> not Blow(x, rebeka))\nBlow(xylia, rebeka) -> Tinker(rebeka, xylia)\nStrafe(rebeka, xylia) and Tinker(xylia, rebeka) -> Strafe(xylia, rebeka)\nStrafe(rebeka, xylia) -> not Pencilled(rebeka)\nBlow(rebeka, xylia) and not Tinker(xylia, rebeka) -> Soiled(rebeka)\n\nnot Cruciate(rebeka)\n\nStrafe(xylia, rebeka) and forall x (Strafe(x, rebeka) -> Cruciate(rebeka)) -> therefore Cruciate(rebeka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The alecia poleax the lin. The alecia is not boring. The alecia is procurable. The alecia is not masterless. The alecia is not custom. The alecia is not frumpy. The alecia insufflate the lin. The alecia does not need the lin. The lin poleax the alecia. The lin is boring. The lin does not like the alecia. The lin does not need the alecia. If something insufflate the lin then it poleax the lin. If something insufflate the lin then the lin is procurable. If something is procurable then it insufflate the lin. If something is boring then it does not need the lin. If the alecia bastinado the lin then the lin poleax the alecia. If the lin insufflate the alecia and the alecia poleax the lin then the alecia insufflate the lin. If the lin insufflate the alecia then the lin is not boring. If the lin bastinado the alecia and the alecia does not chase the lin then the lin is masterless. The lin insufflate the lin.", "logic": "\nPoleax(alecia, lin)\nnot Boring(alecia)\nProcurable(alecia)\nnot Masterless(alecia)\nnot Custom(alecia)\nnot Frumpy(alecia)\nInsufflate(alecia, lin)\nnot Bastinado(alecia, lin)\nPoleax(lin, alecia)\nBoring(lin)\nnot Insufflate(lin, alecia)\nnot Bastinado(lin, alecia)\nforall x (Insufflate(x, lin) -> Poleax(x, lin))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, lin) -> Procurable(lin))\nforall x (Procurable(x) -> Insufflate(x, lin))\nforall x (Boring(x) -> not Bastinado(x, lin))\nBastinado(alecia, lin) -> Poleax(lin, alecia)\nInsufflate(lin, alecia) and Poleax(alecia, lin) -> Insufflate(alecia, lin)\nInsufflate(lin, alecia) -> not Boring(lin)\nBastinado(lin, alecia) and not Poleax(alecia, lin) -> Masterless(lin)\n\nInsufflate(lin, lin)\n\nInsufflate(alecia, lin) and forall x (Insufflate(x, lin) -> Procurable(lin)) -> therefore Procurable(lin) Procurable(lin) and forall x (Procurable(x) -> Insufflate(x, lin)) -> therefore Insufflate(lin, lin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The delly endear the zia. The delly is not elect. The delly is micaceous. The delly is not punic. The delly is not leftish. The delly is not maxillary. The delly faggot the zia. The delly does not need the zia. The zia endear the delly. The zia is elect. The zia does not like the delly. The zia does not need the delly. If something faggot the zia then it endear the zia. If something faggot the zia then the zia is micaceous. If something is micaceous then it faggot the zia. If something is elect then it does not need the zia. If the delly circumfuse the zia then the zia endear the delly. If the zia faggot the delly and the delly endear the zia then the delly faggot the zia. If the zia faggot the delly then the zia is not elect. If the zia circumfuse the delly and the delly does not chase the zia then the zia is punic. The zia does not like the zia.", "logic": "\nEndear(delly, zia)\nnot Elect(delly)\nMicaceous(delly)\nnot Punic(delly)\nnot Leftish(delly)\nnot Maxillary(delly)\nFaggot(delly, zia)\nnot Circumfuse(delly, zia)\nEndear(zia, delly)\nElect(zia)\nnot Faggot(zia, delly)\nnot Circumfuse(zia, delly)\nforall x (Faggot(x, zia) -> Endear(x, zia))\nforall x (Faggot(x, zia) -> Micaceous(zia))\nforall x (Micaceous(x) -> Faggot(x, zia))\nforall x (Elect(x) -> not Circumfuse(x, zia))\nCircumfuse(delly, zia) -> Endear(zia, delly)\nFaggot(zia, delly) and Endear(delly, zia) -> Faggot(delly, zia)\nFaggot(zia, delly) -> not Elect(zia)\nCircumfuse(zia, delly) and not Endear(delly, zia) -> Punic(zia)\n\nnot Faggot(zia, zia)\n\nFaggot(delly, zia) and forall x (Faggot(x, zia) -> Micaceous(zia)) -> therefore Micaceous(zia) Micaceous(zia) and forall x (Micaceous(x) -> Faggot(x, zia)) -> therefore Faggot(zia, zia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The hadleigh dapple the celle. The hadleigh is not reasonable. The hadleigh is overnice. The hadleigh is not melanesian. The hadleigh is not elfin. The hadleigh is not binding. The hadleigh equal the celle. The hadleigh does not need the celle. The celle dapple the hadleigh. The celle is reasonable. The celle does not like the hadleigh. The celle does not need the hadleigh. If something equal the celle then it dapple the celle. If something equal the celle then the celle is overnice. If something is overnice then it equal the celle. If something is reasonable then it does not need the celle. If the hadleigh gibe the celle then the celle dapple the hadleigh. If the celle equal the hadleigh and the hadleigh dapple the celle then the hadleigh equal the celle. If the celle equal the hadleigh then the celle is not reasonable. If the celle gibe the hadleigh and the hadleigh does not chase the celle then the celle is melanesian. The celle dapple the celle.", "logic": "\nDapple(hadleigh, celle)\nnot Reasonable(hadleigh)\nOvernice(hadleigh)\nnot Melanesian(hadleigh)\nnot Elfin(hadleigh)\nnot Binding(hadleigh)\nEqual(hadleigh, celle)\nnot Gibe(hadleigh, celle)\nDapple(celle, hadleigh)\nReasonable(celle)\nnot Equal(celle, hadleigh)\nnot Gibe(celle, hadleigh)\nforall x (Equal(x, celle) -> Dapple(x, celle))\nforall x (Equal(x, celle) -> Overnice(celle))\nforall x (Overnice(x) -> Equal(x, celle))\nforall x (Reasonable(x) -> not Gibe(x, celle))\nGibe(hadleigh, celle) -> Dapple(celle, hadleigh)\nEqual(celle, hadleigh) and Dapple(hadleigh, celle) -> Equal(hadleigh, celle)\nEqual(celle, hadleigh) -> not Reasonable(celle)\nGibe(celle, hadleigh) and not Dapple(hadleigh, celle) -> Melanesian(celle)\n\nDapple(celle, celle)\n\nEqual(hadleigh, celle) and forall x (Equal(x, celle) -> Overnice(celle)) -> therefore Overnice(celle) Overnice(celle) and forall x (Overnice(x) -> Equal(x, celle)) -> therefore Equal(celle, celle) Equal(celle, celle) and forall x (Equal(x, celle) -> Dapple(x, celle)) -> therefore Dapple(celle, celle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The giancarlo homogenise the mandi. The giancarlo is not increased. The giancarlo is pacifistic. The giancarlo is not submersed. The giancarlo is not plundering. The giancarlo is not ambrosial. The giancarlo didder the mandi. The giancarlo does not need the mandi. The mandi homogenise the giancarlo. The mandi is increased. The mandi does not like the giancarlo. The mandi does not need the giancarlo. If something didder the mandi then it homogenise the mandi. If something didder the mandi then the mandi is pacifistic. If something is pacifistic then it didder the mandi. If something is increased then it does not need the mandi. If the giancarlo reassure the mandi then the mandi homogenise the giancarlo. If the mandi didder the giancarlo and the giancarlo homogenise the mandi then the giancarlo didder the mandi. If the mandi didder the giancarlo then the mandi is not increased. If the mandi reassure the giancarlo and the giancarlo does not chase the mandi then the mandi is submersed. The mandi does not chase the mandi.", "logic": "\nHomogenise(giancarlo, mandi)\nnot Increased(giancarlo)\nPacifistic(giancarlo)\nnot Submersed(giancarlo)\nnot Plundering(giancarlo)\nnot Ambrosial(giancarlo)\nDidder(giancarlo, mandi)\nnot Reassure(giancarlo, mandi)\nHomogenise(mandi, giancarlo)\nIncreased(mandi)\nnot Didder(mandi, giancarlo)\nnot Reassure(mandi, giancarlo)\nforall x (Didder(x, mandi) -> Homogenise(x, mandi))\nforall x (Didder(x, mandi) -> Pacifistic(mandi))\nforall x (Pacifistic(x) -> Didder(x, mandi))\nforall x (Increased(x) -> not Reassure(x, mandi))\nReassure(giancarlo, mandi) -> Homogenise(mandi, giancarlo)\nDidder(mandi, giancarlo) and Homogenise(giancarlo, mandi) -> Didder(giancarlo, mandi)\nDidder(mandi, giancarlo) -> not Increased(mandi)\nReassure(mandi, giancarlo) and not Homogenise(giancarlo, mandi) -> Submersed(mandi)\n\nnot Homogenise(mandi, mandi)\n\nDidder(giancarlo, mandi) and forall x (Didder(x, mandi) -> Pacifistic(mandi)) -> therefore Pacifistic(mandi) Pacifistic(mandi) and forall x (Pacifistic(x) -> Didder(x, mandi)) -> therefore Didder(mandi, mandi) Didder(mandi, mandi) and forall x (Didder(x, mandi) -> Homogenise(x, mandi)) -> therefore Homogenise(mandi, mandi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The sheela roar the leilah. The sheela is not sadistic. The sheela is timeless. The sheela is not primal. The sheela is not caesarian. The sheela is not traitorous. The sheela cost the leilah. The sheela does not need the leilah. The leilah roar the sheela. The leilah is sadistic. The leilah does not like the sheela. The leilah does not need the sheela. If something cost the leilah then it roar the leilah. If something cost the leilah then the leilah is timeless. If something is timeless then it cost the leilah. If something is sadistic then it does not need the leilah. If the sheela backstop the leilah then the leilah roar the sheela. If the leilah cost the sheela and the sheela roar the leilah then the sheela cost the leilah. If the leilah cost the sheela then the leilah is not sadistic. If the leilah backstop the sheela and the sheela does not chase the leilah then the leilah is primal. The leilah is not primal.", "logic": "\nRoar(sheela, leilah)\nnot Sadistic(sheela)\nTimeless(sheela)\nnot Primal(sheela)\nnot Caesarian(sheela)\nnot Traitorous(sheela)\nCost(sheela, leilah)\nnot Backstop(sheela, leilah)\nRoar(leilah, sheela)\nSadistic(leilah)\nnot Cost(leilah, sheela)\nnot Backstop(leilah, sheela)\nforall x (Cost(x, leilah) -> Roar(x, leilah))\nforall x (Cost(x, leilah) -> Timeless(leilah))\nforall x (Timeless(x) -> Cost(x, leilah))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> not Backstop(x, leilah))\nBackstop(sheela, leilah) -> Roar(leilah, sheela)\nCost(leilah, sheela) and Roar(sheela, leilah) -> Cost(sheela, leilah)\nCost(leilah, sheela) -> not Sadistic(leilah)\nBackstop(leilah, sheela) and not Roar(sheela, leilah) -> Primal(leilah)\n\nnot Primal(leilah)\n\nBackstop(leilah, sheela) and not Roar(sheela, leilah) -> Primal(leilah) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The kip catalyze the imogene. The kip is not mutilated. The kip is edental. The kip is not ascending. The kip is not stirred. The kip is not eighth. The kip pale the imogene. The kip does not need the imogene. The imogene catalyze the kip. The imogene is mutilated. The imogene does not like the kip. The imogene does not need the kip. If something pale the imogene then it catalyze the imogene. If something pale the imogene then the imogene is edental. If something is edental then it pale the imogene. If something is mutilated then it does not need the imogene. If the kip doss the imogene then the imogene catalyze the kip. If the imogene pale the kip and the kip catalyze the imogene then the kip pale the imogene. If the imogene pale the kip then the imogene is not mutilated. If the imogene doss the kip and the kip does not chase the imogene then the imogene is ascending. The imogene is eighth.", "logic": "\nCatalyze(kip, imogene)\nnot Mutilated(kip)\nEdental(kip)\nnot Ascending(kip)\nnot Stirred(kip)\nnot Eighth(kip)\nPale(kip, imogene)\nnot Doss(kip, imogene)\nCatalyze(imogene, kip)\nMutilated(imogene)\nnot Pale(imogene, kip)\nnot Doss(imogene, kip)\nforall x (Pale(x, imogene) -> Catalyze(x, imogene))\nforall x (Pale(x, imogene) -> Edental(imogene))\nforall x (Edental(x) -> Pale(x, imogene))\nforall x (Mutilated(x) -> not Doss(x, imogene))\nDoss(kip, imogene) -> Catalyze(imogene, kip)\nPale(imogene, kip) and Catalyze(kip, imogene) -> Pale(kip, imogene)\nPale(imogene, kip) -> not Mutilated(imogene)\nDoss(imogene, kip) and not Catalyze(kip, imogene) -> Ascending(imogene)\n\nEighth(imogene)\n\nEighth(imogene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The kacy alight the cecilia. The kacy is not gutless. The kacy is extensible. The kacy is not lucifugal. The kacy is not prominent. The kacy is not unlaced. The kacy refocus the cecilia. The kacy does not need the cecilia. The cecilia alight the kacy. The cecilia is gutless. The cecilia does not like the kacy. The cecilia does not need the kacy. If something refocus the cecilia then it alight the cecilia. If something refocus the cecilia then the cecilia is extensible. If something is extensible then it refocus the cecilia. If something is gutless then it does not need the cecilia. If the kacy plasticize the cecilia then the cecilia alight the kacy. If the cecilia refocus the kacy and the kacy alight the cecilia then the kacy refocus the cecilia. If the cecilia refocus the kacy then the cecilia is not gutless. If the cecilia plasticize the kacy and the kacy does not chase the cecilia then the cecilia is lucifugal. The kacy does not like the kacy.", "logic": "\nAlight(kacy, cecilia)\nnot Gutless(kacy)\nExtensible(kacy)\nnot Lucifugal(kacy)\nnot Prominent(kacy)\nnot Unlaced(kacy)\nRefocus(kacy, cecilia)\nnot Plasticize(kacy, cecilia)\nAlight(cecilia, kacy)\nGutless(cecilia)\nnot Refocus(cecilia, kacy)\nnot Plasticize(cecilia, kacy)\nforall x (Refocus(x, cecilia) -> Alight(x, cecilia))\nforall x (Refocus(x, cecilia) -> Extensible(cecilia))\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Refocus(x, cecilia))\nforall x (Gutless(x) -> not Plasticize(x, cecilia))\nPlasticize(kacy, cecilia) -> Alight(cecilia, kacy)\nRefocus(cecilia, kacy) and Alight(kacy, cecilia) -> Refocus(kacy, cecilia)\nRefocus(cecilia, kacy) -> not Gutless(cecilia)\nPlasticize(cecilia, kacy) and not Alight(kacy, cecilia) -> Lucifugal(cecilia)\n\nnot Refocus(kacy, kacy)\n\nnot Refocus(kacy, kacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The carey strickle the xymenes. The carey is not tasseled. The carey is hottish. The carey is not ninefold. The carey is not roumanian. The carey is not wavelike. The carey invade the xymenes. The carey does not need the xymenes. The xymenes strickle the carey. The xymenes is tasseled. The xymenes does not like the carey. The xymenes does not need the carey. If something invade the xymenes then it strickle the xymenes. If something invade the xymenes then the xymenes is hottish. If something is hottish then it invade the xymenes. If something is tasseled then it does not need the xymenes. If the carey circle the xymenes then the xymenes strickle the carey. If the xymenes invade the carey and the carey strickle the xymenes then the carey invade the xymenes. If the xymenes invade the carey then the xymenes is not tasseled. If the xymenes circle the carey and the carey does not chase the xymenes then the xymenes is ninefold. The carey circle the carey.", "logic": "\nStrickle(carey, xymenes)\nnot Tasseled(carey)\nHottish(carey)\nnot Ninefold(carey)\nnot Roumanian(carey)\nnot Wavelike(carey)\nInvade(carey, xymenes)\nnot Circle(carey, xymenes)\nStrickle(xymenes, carey)\nTasseled(xymenes)\nnot Invade(xymenes, carey)\nnot Circle(xymenes, carey)\nforall x (Invade(x, xymenes) -> Strickle(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Invade(x, xymenes) -> Hottish(xymenes))\nforall x (Hottish(x) -> Invade(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> not Circle(x, xymenes))\nCircle(carey, xymenes) -> Strickle(xymenes, carey)\nInvade(xymenes, carey) and Strickle(carey, xymenes) -> Invade(carey, xymenes)\nInvade(xymenes, carey) -> not Tasseled(xymenes)\nCircle(xymenes, carey) and not Strickle(carey, xymenes) -> Ninefold(xymenes)\n\nCircle(carey, carey)\n\nCircle(carey, carey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The angel cauterise the mitzi. The angel is not asteroidal. The angel is obligated. The angel is not coital. The angel is not unbeatable. The angel is not chiasmal. The angel incandesce the mitzi. The angel does not need the mitzi. The mitzi cauterise the angel. The mitzi is asteroidal. The mitzi does not like the angel. The mitzi does not need the angel. If something incandesce the mitzi then it cauterise the mitzi. If something incandesce the mitzi then the mitzi is obligated. If something is obligated then it incandesce the mitzi. If something is asteroidal then it does not need the mitzi. If the angel glaze the mitzi then the mitzi cauterise the angel. If the mitzi incandesce the angel and the angel cauterise the mitzi then the angel incandesce the mitzi. If the mitzi incandesce the angel then the mitzi is not asteroidal. If the mitzi glaze the angel and the angel does not chase the mitzi then the mitzi is coital. The angel does not chase the angel.", "logic": "\nCauterise(angel, mitzi)\nnot Asteroidal(angel)\nObligated(angel)\nnot Coital(angel)\nnot Unbeatable(angel)\nnot Chiasmal(angel)\nIncandesce(angel, mitzi)\nnot Glaze(angel, mitzi)\nCauterise(mitzi, angel)\nAsteroidal(mitzi)\nnot Incandesce(mitzi, angel)\nnot Glaze(mitzi, angel)\nforall x (Incandesce(x, mitzi) -> Cauterise(x, mitzi))\nforall x (Incandesce(x, mitzi) -> Obligated(mitzi))\nforall x (Obligated(x) -> Incandesce(x, mitzi))\nforall x (Asteroidal(x) -> not Glaze(x, mitzi))\nGlaze(angel, mitzi) -> Cauterise(mitzi, angel)\nIncandesce(mitzi, angel) and Cauterise(angel, mitzi) -> Incandesce(angel, mitzi)\nIncandesce(mitzi, angel) -> not Asteroidal(mitzi)\nGlaze(mitzi, angel) and not Cauterise(angel, mitzi) -> Coital(mitzi)\n\nnot Cauterise(angel, angel)\n\nnot Cauterise(angel, angel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The calvin bugger the casandra. The calvin is not unroofed. The calvin is diachronic. The calvin is not bluff. The calvin is not interwoven. The calvin is not basinal. The calvin thread the casandra. The calvin does not need the casandra. The casandra bugger the calvin. The casandra is unroofed. The casandra does not like the calvin. The casandra does not need the calvin. If something thread the casandra then it bugger the casandra. If something thread the casandra then the casandra is diachronic. If something is diachronic then it thread the casandra. If something is unroofed then it does not need the casandra. If the calvin literalise the casandra then the casandra bugger the calvin. If the casandra thread the calvin and the calvin bugger the casandra then the calvin thread the casandra. If the casandra thread the calvin then the casandra is not unroofed. If the casandra literalise the calvin and the calvin does not chase the casandra then the casandra is bluff. The casandra is interwoven.", "logic": "\nBugger(calvin, casandra)\nnot Unroofed(calvin)\nDiachronic(calvin)\nnot Bluff(calvin)\nnot Interwoven(calvin)\nnot Basinal(calvin)\nThread(calvin, casandra)\nnot Literalise(calvin, casandra)\nBugger(casandra, calvin)\nUnroofed(casandra)\nnot Thread(casandra, calvin)\nnot Literalise(casandra, calvin)\nforall x (Thread(x, casandra) -> Bugger(x, casandra))\nforall x (Thread(x, casandra) -> Diachronic(casandra))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) -> Thread(x, casandra))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> not Literalise(x, casandra))\nLiteralise(calvin, casandra) -> Bugger(casandra, calvin)\nThread(casandra, calvin) and Bugger(calvin, casandra) -> Thread(calvin, casandra)\nThread(casandra, calvin) -> not Unroofed(casandra)\nLiteralise(casandra, calvin) and not Bugger(calvin, casandra) -> Bluff(casandra)\n\nInterwoven(casandra)\n\nInterwoven(casandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "Sibby is capital. Jorge is haywire. Leodora is stooped. Linnie is eurasian. If something is eurasian then it is deafened. All deafened things are capital. If something is stooped then it is eurasian. Linnie is eurasian.", "logic": "\nCapital(sibby)\nHaywire(jorge)\nStooped(leodora)\nEurasian(linnie)\nforall x (Eurasian(x) -> Deafened(x))\nforall x (Deafened(x) -> Capital(x))\nforall x (Stooped(x) -> Eurasian(x))\n\nEurasian(linnie)\n\ntherefore Eurasian(linnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Muire is unimproved. Neddy is anguillan. Leon is tiptop. Marta is stinting. If something is stinting then it is frightful. All frightful things are unimproved. If something is tiptop then it is stinting. Muire is not unimproved.", "logic": "\nUnimproved(muire)\nAnguillan(neddy)\nTiptop(leon)\nStinting(marta)\nforall x (Stinting(x) -> Frightful(x))\nforall x (Frightful(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Tiptop(x) -> Stinting(x))\n\nnot Unimproved(muire)\n\ntherefore Unimproved(muire)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "John is bucolic. Meggy is hapless. Olle is unforceful. Terrance is pentatonic. If something is pentatonic then it is worthful. All worthful things are bucolic. If something is unforceful then it is pentatonic. Olle is pentatonic.", "logic": "\nBucolic(john)\nHapless(meggy)\nUnforceful(olle)\nPentatonic(terrance)\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Worthful(x))\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> Bucolic(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\n\nPentatonic(olle)\n\nUnforceful(olle) and forall x (Unforceful(x) -> Pentatonic(x)) -> therefore Pentatonic(olle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Lonny is unironed. Bret is unsighted. Henry is tartarean. Dexter is dumb. If something is dumb then it is sulphuric. All sulphuric things are unironed. If something is tartarean then it is dumb. Dexter is not sulphuric.", "logic": "\nUnironed(lonny)\nUnsighted(bret)\nTartarean(henry)\nDumb(dexter)\nforall x (Dumb(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Unironed(x))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) -> Dumb(x))\n\nnot Sulphuric(dexter)\n\nDumb(dexter) and forall x (Dumb(x) -> Sulphuric(x)) -> therefore Sulphuric(dexter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Guthrie is activating. Floris is abuzz. Boyce is deltoid. Syd is ungrateful. If something is ungrateful then it is congruous. All congruous things are activating. If something is deltoid then it is ungrateful. Syd is activating.", "logic": "\nActivating(guthrie)\nAbuzz(floris)\nDeltoid(boyce)\nUngrateful(syd)\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Congruous(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) -> Activating(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\n\nActivating(syd)\n\nUngrateful(syd) and forall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Congruous(x)) -> therefore Congruous(syd) Congruous(syd) and forall x (Congruous(x) -> Activating(x)) -> therefore Activating(syd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Adina is motorised. Bernette is unpriestly. Jacinta is speckless. Acacia is bulky. If something is bulky then it is amino. All amino things are motorised. If something is speckless then it is bulky. Acacia is not motorised.", "logic": "\nMotorised(adina)\nUnpriestly(bernette)\nSpeckless(jacinta)\nBulky(acacia)\nforall x (Bulky(x) -> Amino(x))\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Motorised(x))\nforall x (Speckless(x) -> Bulky(x))\n\nnot Motorised(acacia)\n\nBulky(acacia) and forall x (Bulky(x) -> Amino(x)) -> therefore Amino(acacia) Amino(acacia) and forall x (Amino(x) -> Motorised(x)) -> therefore Motorised(acacia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Ardelia is tart. Candis is typic. Prissie is ebullient. Bobina is alated. If something is alated then it is penitent. All penitent things are tart. If something is ebullient then it is alated. Prissie is tart.", "logic": "\nTart(ardelia)\nTypic(candis)\nEbullient(prissie)\nAlated(bobina)\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Penitent(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Ebullient(x) -> Alated(x))\n\nTart(prissie)\n\nEbullient(prissie) and forall x (Ebullient(x) -> Alated(x)) -> therefore Alated(prissie) Alated(prissie) and forall x (Alated(x) -> Penitent(x)) -> therefore Penitent(prissie) Penitent(prissie) and forall x (Penitent(x) -> Tart(x)) -> therefore Tart(prissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Gussy is eventual. Selina is languid. Loni is deathless. Steffane is keynesian. If something is keynesian then it is peripteral. All peripteral things are eventual. If something is deathless then it is keynesian. Loni is not eventual.", "logic": "\nEventual(gussy)\nLanguid(selina)\nDeathless(loni)\nKeynesian(steffane)\nforall x (Keynesian(x) -> Peripteral(x))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) -> Eventual(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Keynesian(x))\n\nnot Eventual(loni)\n\nDeathless(loni) and forall x (Deathless(x) -> Keynesian(x)) -> therefore Keynesian(loni) Keynesian(loni) and forall x (Keynesian(x) -> Peripteral(x)) -> therefore Peripteral(loni) Peripteral(loni) and forall x (Peripteral(x) -> Eventual(x)) -> therefore Eventual(loni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Eleni is weather. Celestine is pimpled. Alexandra is slovenian. Cathie is prosodic. If something is prosodic then it is nominative. All nominative things are weather. If something is slovenian then it is prosodic. Celestine is not nominative.", "logic": "\nWeather(eleni)\nPimpled(celestine)\nSlovenian(alexandra)\nProsodic(cathie)\nforall x (Prosodic(x) -> Nominative(x))\nforall x (Nominative(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Slovenian(x) -> Prosodic(x))\n\nnot Nominative(celestine)\n\nforall x (Prosodic(x) -> Nominative(x)) <- forall x (Slovenian(x) -> Prosodic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Camila is motor. Shawnee is tactical. Lavinie is irresolute. Rosalind is placid. If something is placid then it is spurting. All spurting things are motor. If something is irresolute then it is placid. Camila is spurting.", "logic": "\nMotor(camila)\nTactical(shawnee)\nIrresolute(lavinie)\nPlacid(rosalind)\nforall x (Placid(x) -> Spurting(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Irresolute(x) -> Placid(x))\n\nSpurting(camila)\n\nforall x (Placid(x) -> Spurting(x)) <- forall x (Irresolute(x) -> Placid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Carmelle is lethal. Consuela is nidicolous. Kaleb is adoptive. Mick is spiky. If something is spiky then it is treacly. All treacly things are lethal. If something is adoptive then it is spiky. Consuela is not spiky.", "logic": "\nLethal(carmelle)\nNidicolous(consuela)\nAdoptive(kaleb)\nSpiky(mick)\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> Treacly(x))\nforall x (Treacly(x) -> Lethal(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Spiky(x))\n\nnot Spiky(consuela)\n\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Spiky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Catriona is surmisable. Norry is bogartian. Calida is blonde. Herminia is bettering. If something is bettering then it is overripe. All overripe things are surmisable. If something is blonde then it is bettering. Catriona is bettering.", "logic": "\nSurmisable(catriona)\nBogartian(norry)\nBlonde(calida)\nBettering(herminia)\nforall x (Bettering(x) -> Overripe(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Blonde(x) -> Bettering(x))\n\nBettering(catriona)\n\nforall x (Blonde(x) -> Bettering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Elladine is casual. Dierdre is patented. Alissa is graded. Clarette is himalayan. If something is himalayan then it is powered. All powered things are casual. If something is graded then it is himalayan. Clarette is not patented.", "logic": "\nCasual(elladine)\nPatented(dierdre)\nGraded(alissa)\nHimalayan(clarette)\nforall x (Himalayan(x) -> Powered(x))\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Casual(x))\nforall x (Graded(x) -> Himalayan(x))\n\nnot Patented(clarette)\n\nnot Patented(clarette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Elfie is unwaxed. Casia is affluent. Marquita is alike. Gilli is remaining. If something is remaining then it is licensed. All licensed things are unwaxed. If something is alike then it is remaining. Elfie is rough.", "logic": "\nUnwaxed(elfie)\nAffluent(casia)\nAlike(marquita)\nRemaining(gilli)\nforall x (Remaining(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Licensed(x) -> Unwaxed(x))\nforall x (Alike(x) -> Remaining(x))\n\nRough(elfie)\n\nRough(elfie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Sacha is stannous. Gerladina is gyroscopic. Dorise is just. Berkie is extrinsic. If something is extrinsic then it is onomastic. All onomastic things are stannous. If something is just then it is extrinsic. Dorise is not gyroscopic.", "logic": "\nStannous(sacha)\nGyroscopic(gerladina)\nJust(dorise)\nExtrinsic(berkie)\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Onomastic(x))\nforall x (Onomastic(x) -> Stannous(x))\nforall x (Just(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\n\nnot Gyroscopic(dorise)\n\nnot Gyroscopic(dorise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Kizzie is square. Karly is hertzian. Lyndsay is chic. Jenica is meteoric. If something is meteoric then it is lilac. All lilac things are square. If something is chic then it is meteoric. Jenica is rough.", "logic": "\nSquare(kizzie)\nHertzian(karly)\nChic(lyndsay)\nMeteoric(jenica)\nforall x (Meteoric(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> Square(x))\nforall x (Chic(x) -> Meteoric(x))\n\nRough(jenica)\n\nRough(jenica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Lorrin is conforming. West is ammoniac. Elinore is consolable. If Elinore is trimmed then Elinore is escaped. If Lorrin is mesophytic and Lorrin is not conforming then Lorrin is trimmed. Big things are mesophytic. White things are trimmed. If something is consolable then it is algerian. If something is trimmed and consolable then it is ammoniac. Smart things are consolable. If something is conforming and not trimmed then it is not escaped. West is ammoniac.", "logic": "\nConforming(lorrin)\nAmmoniac(west)\nConsolable(elinore)\nTrimmed(elinore) -> Escaped(elinore)\nMesophytic(lorrin) and not Conforming(lorrin) -> Trimmed(lorrin)\nforall x (Conforming(x) -> Mesophytic(x))\nforall x (Ammoniac(x) -> Trimmed(x))\nforall x (Consolable(x) -> Algerian(x))\nforall x (Trimmed(x) and Consolable(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Trimmed(x) -> Consolable(x))\nforall x (Conforming(x) and not Trimmed(x) -> not Escaped(x))\n\nAmmoniac(west)\n\ntherefore Ammoniac(west)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Danya is fledged. Danell is split. Cobby is nonplussed. If Cobby is biannual then Cobby is assessable. If Danya is ecdemic and Danya is not fledged then Danya is biannual. Big things are ecdemic. White things are biannual. If something is nonplussed then it is wizen. If something is biannual and nonplussed then it is split. Smart things are nonplussed. If something is fledged and not biannual then it is not assessable. Danell is not split.", "logic": "\nFledged(danya)\nSplit(danell)\nNonplussed(cobby)\nBiannual(cobby) -> Assessable(cobby)\nEcdemic(danya) and not Fledged(danya) -> Biannual(danya)\nforall x (Fledged(x) -> Ecdemic(x))\nforall x (Split(x) -> Biannual(x))\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Wizen(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) and Nonplussed(x) -> Split(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) -> Nonplussed(x))\nforall x (Fledged(x) and not Biannual(x) -> not Assessable(x))\n\nnot Split(danell)\n\ntherefore Split(danell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Tally is wheaten. Jimbo is abasic. Suzanna is compounded. If Suzanna is bald then Suzanna is defensive. If Tally is hispid and Tally is not wheaten then Tally is bald. Big things are hispid. White things are bald. If something is compounded then it is accurst. If something is bald and compounded then it is abasic. Smart things are compounded. If something is wheaten and not bald then it is not defensive. Jimbo is bald.", "logic": "\nWheaten(tally)\nAbasic(jimbo)\nCompounded(suzanna)\nBald(suzanna) -> Defensive(suzanna)\nHispid(tally) and not Wheaten(tally) -> Bald(tally)\nforall x (Wheaten(x) -> Hispid(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Compounded(x) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Compounded(x))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) and not Bald(x) -> not Defensive(x))\n\nBald(jimbo)\n\nAbasic(jimbo) and forall x (Abasic(x) -> Bald(x)) -> therefore Bald(jimbo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Carry is steep. Kirbie is saxon. Sharron is ploughed. If Sharron is unalike then Sharron is palatal. If Carry is unsalable and Carry is not steep then Carry is unalike. Big things are unsalable. White things are unalike. If something is ploughed then it is hipless. If something is unalike and ploughed then it is saxon. Smart things are ploughed. If something is steep and not unalike then it is not palatal. Sharron is not hipless.", "logic": "\nSteep(carry)\nSaxon(kirbie)\nPloughed(sharron)\nUnalike(sharron) -> Palatal(sharron)\nUnsalable(carry) and not Steep(carry) -> Unalike(carry)\nforall x (Steep(x) -> Unsalable(x))\nforall x (Saxon(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Hipless(x))\nforall x (Unalike(x) and Ploughed(x) -> Saxon(x))\nforall x (Unalike(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Steep(x) and not Unalike(x) -> not Palatal(x))\n\nnot Hipless(sharron)\n\nPloughed(sharron) and forall x (Ploughed(x) -> Hipless(x)) -> therefore Hipless(sharron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Kylila is generative. Ardine is christlike. Saw is lincolnian. If Saw is perturbing then Saw is typical. If Kylila is bulky and Kylila is not generative then Kylila is perturbing. Big things are bulky. White things are perturbing. If something is lincolnian then it is isoclinal. If something is perturbing and lincolnian then it is christlike. Smart things are lincolnian. If something is generative and not perturbing then it is not typical. Ardine is lincolnian.", "logic": "\nGenerative(kylila)\nChristlike(ardine)\nLincolnian(saw)\nPerturbing(saw) -> Typical(saw)\nBulky(kylila) and not Generative(kylila) -> Perturbing(kylila)\nforall x (Generative(x) -> Bulky(x))\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Isoclinal(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) and Lincolnian(x) -> Christlike(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nforall x (Generative(x) and not Perturbing(x) -> not Typical(x))\n\nLincolnian(ardine)\n\nChristlike(ardine) and forall x (Christlike(x) -> Perturbing(x)) -> therefore Perturbing(ardine) Perturbing(ardine) and forall x (Perturbing(x) -> Lincolnian(x)) -> therefore Lincolnian(ardine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Charil is motorized. Angus is branchiate. Larine is slumbery. If Larine is light then Larine is exonerated. If Charil is pencilled and Charil is not motorized then Charil is light. Big things are pencilled. White things are light. If something is slumbery then it is polynomial. If something is light and slumbery then it is branchiate. Smart things are slumbery. If something is motorized and not light then it is not exonerated. Angus is not slumbery.", "logic": "\nMotorized(charil)\nBranchiate(angus)\nSlumbery(larine)\nLight(larine) -> Exonerated(larine)\nPencilled(charil) and not Motorized(charil) -> Light(charil)\nforall x (Motorized(x) -> Pencilled(x))\nforall x (Branchiate(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Polynomial(x))\nforall x (Light(x) and Slumbery(x) -> Branchiate(x))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Slumbery(x))\nforall x (Motorized(x) and not Light(x) -> not Exonerated(x))\n\nnot Slumbery(angus)\n\nBranchiate(angus) and forall x (Branchiate(x) -> Light(x)) -> therefore Light(angus) Light(angus) and forall x (Light(x) -> Slumbery(x)) -> therefore Slumbery(angus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Carlye is tenebrous. Jessica is argentic. Melany is gabby. If Melany is homocercal then Melany is grave. If Carlye is pedagogic and Carlye is not tenebrous then Carlye is homocercal. Big things are pedagogic. White things are homocercal. If something is gabby then it is standby. If something is homocercal and gabby then it is argentic. Smart things are gabby. If something is tenebrous and not homocercal then it is not grave. Jessica is standby.", "logic": "\nTenebrous(carlye)\nArgentic(jessica)\nGabby(melany)\nHomocercal(melany) -> Grave(melany)\nPedagogic(carlye) and not Tenebrous(carlye) -> Homocercal(carlye)\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Pedagogic(x))\nforall x (Argentic(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Gabby(x) -> Standby(x))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) and Gabby(x) -> Argentic(x))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) -> Gabby(x))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) and not Homocercal(x) -> not Grave(x))\n\nStandby(jessica)\n\nArgentic(jessica) and forall x (Argentic(x) -> Homocercal(x)) -> therefore Homocercal(jessica) Homocercal(jessica) and forall x (Homocercal(x) -> Gabby(x)) -> therefore Gabby(jessica) Gabby(jessica) and forall x (Gabby(x) -> Standby(x)) -> therefore Standby(jessica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Samaria is assured. Alyda is shiny. Samuel is argentic. If Samuel is eyed then Samuel is undimmed. If Samaria is latin and Samaria is not assured then Samaria is eyed. Big things are latin. White things are eyed. If something is argentic then it is duncical. If something is eyed and argentic then it is shiny. Smart things are argentic. If something is assured and not eyed then it is not undimmed. Alyda is not duncical.", "logic": "\nAssured(samaria)\nShiny(alyda)\nArgentic(samuel)\nEyed(samuel) -> Undimmed(samuel)\nLatin(samaria) and not Assured(samaria) -> Eyed(samaria)\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Shiny(x) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Argentic(x) -> Duncical(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) and Argentic(x) -> Shiny(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Argentic(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) and not Eyed(x) -> not Undimmed(x))\n\nnot Duncical(alyda)\n\nShiny(alyda) and forall x (Shiny(x) -> Eyed(x)) -> therefore Eyed(alyda) Eyed(alyda) and forall x (Eyed(x) -> Argentic(x)) -> therefore Argentic(alyda) Argentic(alyda) and forall x (Argentic(x) -> Duncical(x)) -> therefore Duncical(alyda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Tiphani is chirpy. Alvera is expressive. Wright is malignant. If Wright is epicarpal then Wright is fleshy. If Tiphani is eugenic and Tiphani is not chirpy then Tiphani is epicarpal. Big things are eugenic. White things are epicarpal. If something is malignant then it is uncensored. If something is epicarpal and malignant then it is expressive. Smart things are malignant. If something is chirpy and not epicarpal then it is not fleshy. Wright is not epicarpal.", "logic": "\nChirpy(tiphani)\nExpressive(alvera)\nMalignant(wright)\nEpicarpal(wright) -> Fleshy(wright)\nEugenic(tiphani) and not Chirpy(tiphani) -> Epicarpal(tiphani)\nforall x (Chirpy(x) -> Eugenic(x))\nforall x (Expressive(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\nforall x (Malignant(x) -> Uncensored(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) and Malignant(x) -> Expressive(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) -> Malignant(x))\nforall x (Chirpy(x) and not Epicarpal(x) -> not Fleshy(x))\n\nnot Epicarpal(wright)\n\nforall x (Expressive(x) -> Epicarpal(x)) <- forall x (Epicarpal(x) and Malignant(x) -> Expressive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Cybel is itchy. Staford is wartlike. Kala is strange. If Kala is unshelled then Kala is creole. If Cybel is theist and Cybel is not itchy then Cybel is unshelled. Big things are theist. White things are unshelled. If something is strange then it is grilled. If something is unshelled and strange then it is wartlike. Smart things are strange. If something is itchy and not unshelled then it is not creole. Staford is theist.", "logic": "\nItchy(cybel)\nWartlike(staford)\nStrange(kala)\nUnshelled(kala) -> Creole(kala)\nTheist(cybel) and not Itchy(cybel) -> Unshelled(cybel)\nforall x (Itchy(x) -> Theist(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Unshelled(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) and Strange(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) -> Strange(x))\nforall x (Itchy(x) and not Unshelled(x) -> not Creole(x))\n\nTheist(staford)\n\nforall x (Itchy(x) -> Theist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Cissy is unsyllabic. Tedmund is detached. Danika is accepted. If Danika is rattling then Danika is unproven. If Cissy is botanic and Cissy is not unsyllabic then Cissy is rattling. Big things are botanic. White things are rattling. If something is accepted then it is erroneous. If something is rattling and accepted then it is detached. Smart things are accepted. If something is unsyllabic and not rattling then it is not unproven. Cissy is not accepted.", "logic": "\nUnsyllabic(cissy)\nDetached(tedmund)\nAccepted(danika)\nRattling(danika) -> Unproven(danika)\nBotanic(cissy) and not Unsyllabic(cissy) -> Rattling(cissy)\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> Botanic(x))\nforall x (Detached(x) -> Rattling(x))\nforall x (Accepted(x) -> Erroneous(x))\nforall x (Rattling(x) and Accepted(x) -> Detached(x))\nforall x (Rattling(x) -> Accepted(x))\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) and not Rattling(x) -> not Unproven(x))\n\nnot Accepted(cissy)\n\nforall x (Rattling(x) -> Accepted(x)) <- forall x (Detached(x) -> Rattling(x)) <- forall x (Rattling(x) and Accepted(x) -> Detached(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Goldarina is metric. Linea is bumpkinly. Jennie is sublimated. If Jennie is hurt then Jennie is rawboned. If Goldarina is nutty and Goldarina is not metric then Goldarina is hurt. Big things are nutty. White things are hurt. If something is sublimated then it is private. If something is hurt and sublimated then it is bumpkinly. Smart things are sublimated. If something is metric and not hurt then it is not rawboned. Jennie is nutty.", "logic": "\nMetric(goldarina)\nBumpkinly(linea)\nSublimated(jennie)\nHurt(jennie) -> Rawboned(jennie)\nNutty(goldarina) and not Metric(goldarina) -> Hurt(goldarina)\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Nutty(x))\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) -> Hurt(x))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) and Sublimated(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) -> Sublimated(x))\nforall x (Metric(x) and not Hurt(x) -> not Rawboned(x))\n\nNutty(jennie)\n\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Nutty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Kareem is gangly. Susie is downstair. Corky is numerical. If Corky is spiteful then Corky is qatari. If Kareem is unpromised and Kareem is not gangly then Kareem is spiteful. Big things are unpromised. White things are spiteful. If something is numerical then it is bald. If something is spiteful and numerical then it is downstair. Smart things are numerical. If something is gangly and not spiteful then it is not qatari. Kareem is not qatari.", "logic": "\nGangly(kareem)\nDownstair(susie)\nNumerical(corky)\nSpiteful(corky) -> Qatari(corky)\nUnpromised(kareem) and not Gangly(kareem) -> Spiteful(kareem)\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Unpromised(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) -> Spiteful(x))\nforall x (Numerical(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) and Numerical(x) -> Downstair(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) -> Numerical(x))\nforall x (Gangly(x) and not Spiteful(x) -> not Qatari(x))\n\nnot Qatari(kareem)\n\nnot Qatari(kareem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Beau is negligent. Tucky is unexcited. Amadeus is delusory. If Amadeus is magnetised then Amadeus is bold. If Beau is coseismic and Beau is not negligent then Beau is magnetised. Big things are coseismic. White things are magnetised. If something is delusory then it is rattling. If something is magnetised and delusory then it is unexcited. Smart things are delusory. If something is negligent and not magnetised then it is not bold. Amadeus is negligent.", "logic": "\nNegligent(beau)\nUnexcited(tucky)\nDelusory(amadeus)\nMagnetised(amadeus) -> Bold(amadeus)\nCoseismic(beau) and not Negligent(beau) -> Magnetised(beau)\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Unexcited(x) -> Magnetised(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> Rattling(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) and Delusory(x) -> Unexcited(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) and not Magnetised(x) -> not Bold(x))\n\nNegligent(amadeus)\n\nNegligent(amadeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Dawson is caseous. Diena is strait. Oralie is ongoing. If Oralie is debonair then Oralie is basiscopic. If Dawson is brainsick and Dawson is not caseous then Dawson is debonair. Big things are brainsick. White things are debonair. If something is ongoing then it is burning. If something is debonair and ongoing then it is strait. Smart things are ongoing. If something is caseous and not debonair then it is not basiscopic. Diena is not caseous.", "logic": "\nCaseous(dawson)\nStrait(diena)\nOngoing(oralie)\nDebonair(oralie) -> Basiscopic(oralie)\nBrainsick(dawson) and not Caseous(dawson) -> Debonair(dawson)\nforall x (Caseous(x) -> Brainsick(x))\nforall x (Strait(x) -> Debonair(x))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Burning(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) and Ongoing(x) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) and not Debonair(x) -> not Basiscopic(x))\n\nnot Caseous(diena)\n\nnot Caseous(diena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Maurise is sweetish. Bertha is monovular. Corinna is terefah. If Corinna is whipping then Corinna is heathlike. If Maurise is fizzy and Maurise is not sweetish then Maurise is whipping. Big things are fizzy. White things are whipping. If something is terefah then it is tasteful. If something is whipping and terefah then it is monovular. Smart things are terefah. If something is sweetish and not whipping then it is not heathlike. Bertha is heathlike.", "logic": "\nSweetish(maurise)\nMonovular(bertha)\nTerefah(corinna)\nWhipping(corinna) -> Heathlike(corinna)\nFizzy(maurise) and not Sweetish(maurise) -> Whipping(maurise)\nforall x (Sweetish(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Monovular(x) -> Whipping(x))\nforall x (Terefah(x) -> Tasteful(x))\nforall x (Whipping(x) and Terefah(x) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Whipping(x) -> Terefah(x))\nforall x (Sweetish(x) and not Whipping(x) -> not Heathlike(x))\n\nHeathlike(bertha)\n\nHeathlike(bertha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "The moll predecease the nickey. The nickey is denatured. If someone pilot the nickey then the nickey is unshelled. If someone predecease the nickey then they are slack. If someone is denatured and they need the moll then they eat the nickey. If someone predecease the nickey then they eat the moll. If someone is uncoated and they eat the moll then they need the nickey. If the nickey pilot the moll then the moll pilot the nickey. If the moll predecease the nickey and the nickey is denatured then the moll is uncoated. If someone is unshelled and they do not eat the moll then the moll exaggerate the nickey. The nickey is denatured.", "logic": "\nPredecease(moll, nickey)\nDenatured(nickey)\nforall x (Pilot(x, nickey) -> Unshelled(nickey))\nforall x (Predecease(x, nickey) -> Slack(x))\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Pilot(x, moll) -> Predecease(x, nickey))\nforall x (Predecease(x, nickey) -> Predecease(x, moll))\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and Predecease(x, moll) -> Pilot(x, nickey))\nPilot(nickey, moll) -> Pilot(moll, nickey)\nPredecease(moll, nickey) and Denatured(nickey) -> Uncoated(moll)\nforall x (Unshelled(x) and not Predecease(x, moll) -> Exaggerate(moll, nickey))\n\nDenatured(nickey)\n\ntherefore Denatured(nickey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The demetri abound the lazare. The lazare is abstinent. If someone bach the lazare then the lazare is taloned. If someone abound the lazare then they are pupillary. If someone is abstinent and they need the demetri then they eat the lazare. If someone abound the lazare then they eat the demetri. If someone is wifelike and they eat the demetri then they need the lazare. If the lazare bach the demetri then the demetri bach the lazare. If the demetri abound the lazare and the lazare is abstinent then the demetri is wifelike. If someone is taloned and they do not eat the demetri then the demetri riddle the lazare. The lazare is not abstinent.", "logic": "\nAbound(demetri, lazare)\nAbstinent(lazare)\nforall x (Bach(x, lazare) -> Taloned(lazare))\nforall x (Abound(x, lazare) -> Pupillary(x))\nforall x (Abstinent(x) and Bach(x, demetri) -> Abound(x, lazare))\nforall x (Abound(x, lazare) -> Abound(x, demetri))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) and Abound(x, demetri) -> Bach(x, lazare))\nBach(lazare, demetri) -> Bach(demetri, lazare)\nAbound(demetri, lazare) and Abstinent(lazare) -> Wifelike(demetri)\nforall x (Taloned(x) and not Abound(x, demetri) -> Riddle(demetri, lazare))\n\nnot Abstinent(lazare)\n\ntherefore Abstinent(lazare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The deana concentre the nolana. The nolana is rank. If someone prink the nolana then the nolana is jamesian. If someone concentre the nolana then they are untapped. If someone is rank and they need the deana then they eat the nolana. If someone concentre the nolana then they eat the deana. If someone is posed and they eat the deana then they need the nolana. If the nolana prink the deana then the deana prink the nolana. If the deana concentre the nolana and the nolana is rank then the deana is posed. If someone is jamesian and they do not eat the deana then the deana badger the nolana. The deana concentre the deana.", "logic": "\nConcentre(deana, nolana)\nRank(nolana)\nforall x (Prink(x, nolana) -> Jamesian(nolana))\nforall x (Concentre(x, nolana) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) and Prink(x, deana) -> Concentre(x, nolana))\nforall x (Concentre(x, nolana) -> Concentre(x, deana))\nforall x (Posed(x) and Concentre(x, deana) -> Prink(x, nolana))\nPrink(nolana, deana) -> Prink(deana, nolana)\nConcentre(deana, nolana) and Rank(nolana) -> Posed(deana)\nforall x (Jamesian(x) and not Concentre(x, deana) -> Badger(deana, nolana))\n\nConcentre(deana, deana)\n\nConcentre(deana, nolana) and forall x (Concentre(x, nolana) -> Concentre(x, deana)) -> therefore Concentre(deana, deana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The dorree wind the charmaine. The charmaine is cyrillic. If someone disavow the charmaine then the charmaine is convivial. If someone wind the charmaine then they are ceric. If someone is cyrillic and they need the dorree then they eat the charmaine. If someone wind the charmaine then they eat the dorree. If someone is emasculate and they eat the dorree then they need the charmaine. If the charmaine disavow the dorree then the dorree disavow the charmaine. If the dorree wind the charmaine and the charmaine is cyrillic then the dorree is emasculate. If someone is convivial and they do not eat the dorree then the dorree mistrust the charmaine. The dorree does not eat the dorree.", "logic": "\nWind(dorree, charmaine)\nCyrillic(charmaine)\nforall x (Disavow(x, charmaine) -> Convivial(charmaine))\nforall x (Wind(x, charmaine) -> Ceric(x))\nforall x (Cyrillic(x) and Disavow(x, dorree) -> Wind(x, charmaine))\nforall x (Wind(x, charmaine) -> Wind(x, dorree))\nforall x (Emasculate(x) and Wind(x, dorree) -> Disavow(x, charmaine))\nDisavow(charmaine, dorree) -> Disavow(dorree, charmaine)\nWind(dorree, charmaine) and Cyrillic(charmaine) -> Emasculate(dorree)\nforall x (Convivial(x) and not Wind(x, dorree) -> Mistrust(dorree, charmaine))\n\nnot Wind(dorree, dorree)\n\nWind(dorree, charmaine) and forall x (Wind(x, charmaine) -> Wind(x, dorree)) -> therefore Wind(dorree, dorree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The henrieta snail the clerissa. The clerissa is ivied. If someone deaf the clerissa then the clerissa is coccygeal. If someone snail the clerissa then they are timely. If someone is ivied and they need the henrieta then they eat the clerissa. If someone snail the clerissa then they eat the henrieta. If someone is mettlesome and they eat the henrieta then they need the clerissa. If the clerissa deaf the henrieta then the henrieta deaf the clerissa. If the henrieta snail the clerissa and the clerissa is ivied then the henrieta is mettlesome. If someone is coccygeal and they do not eat the henrieta then the henrieta rattle the clerissa. The henrieta deaf the clerissa.", "logic": "\nSnail(henrieta, clerissa)\nIvied(clerissa)\nforall x (Deaf(x, clerissa) -> Coccygeal(clerissa))\nforall x (Snail(x, clerissa) -> Timely(x))\nforall x (Ivied(x) and Deaf(x, henrieta) -> Snail(x, clerissa))\nforall x (Snail(x, clerissa) -> Snail(x, henrieta))\nforall x (Mettlesome(x) and Snail(x, henrieta) -> Deaf(x, clerissa))\nDeaf(clerissa, henrieta) -> Deaf(henrieta, clerissa)\nSnail(henrieta, clerissa) and Ivied(clerissa) -> Mettlesome(henrieta)\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) and not Snail(x, henrieta) -> Rattle(henrieta, clerissa))\n\nDeaf(henrieta, clerissa)\n\nSnail(henrieta, clerissa) and Ivied(clerissa) and Snail(henrieta, clerissa) and Ivied(clerissa) -> Mettlesome(henrieta) -> therefore Mettlesome(henrieta) Snail(henrieta, clerissa) and forall x (Snail(x, clerissa) -> Snail(x, henrieta)) -> therefore Snail(henrieta, henrieta) Mettlesome(henrieta) and Snail(henrieta, henrieta) and forall x (Mettlesome(x) and Snail(x, henrieta) -> Deaf(x, clerissa)) -> therefore Deaf(henrieta, clerissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The monique batfowl the scottie. The scottie is incredible. If someone foreshadow the scottie then the scottie is glomerular. If someone batfowl the scottie then they are interim. If someone is incredible and they need the monique then they eat the scottie. If someone batfowl the scottie then they eat the monique. If someone is atomistic and they eat the monique then they need the scottie. If the scottie foreshadow the monique then the monique foreshadow the scottie. If the monique batfowl the scottie and the scottie is incredible then the monique is atomistic. If someone is glomerular and they do not eat the monique then the monique adduce the scottie. The monique does not need the scottie.", "logic": "\nBatfowl(monique, scottie)\nIncredible(scottie)\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, scottie) -> Glomerular(scottie))\nforall x (Batfowl(x, scottie) -> Interim(x))\nforall x (Incredible(x) and Foreshadow(x, monique) -> Batfowl(x, scottie))\nforall x (Batfowl(x, scottie) -> Batfowl(x, monique))\nforall x (Atomistic(x) and Batfowl(x, monique) -> Foreshadow(x, scottie))\nForeshadow(scottie, monique) -> Foreshadow(monique, scottie)\nBatfowl(monique, scottie) and Incredible(scottie) -> Atomistic(monique)\nforall x (Glomerular(x) and not Batfowl(x, monique) -> Adduce(monique, scottie))\n\nnot Foreshadow(monique, scottie)\n\nBatfowl(monique, scottie) and Incredible(scottie) and Batfowl(monique, scottie) and Incredible(scottie) -> Atomistic(monique) -> therefore Atomistic(monique) Batfowl(monique, scottie) and forall x (Batfowl(x, scottie) -> Batfowl(x, monique)) -> therefore Batfowl(monique, monique) Atomistic(monique) and Batfowl(monique, monique) and forall x (Atomistic(x) and Batfowl(x, monique) -> Foreshadow(x, scottie)) -> therefore Foreshadow(monique, scottie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The jules name the case. The case is raiseable. If someone sprout the case then the case is civilian. If someone name the case then they are pulseless. If someone is raiseable and they need the jules then they eat the case. If someone name the case then they eat the jules. If someone is bipolar and they eat the jules then they need the case. If the case sprout the jules then the jules sprout the case. If the jules name the case and the case is raiseable then the jules is bipolar. If someone is civilian and they do not eat the jules then the jules ingrain the case. The case is civilian.", "logic": "\nName(jules, case)\nRaiseable(case)\nforall x (Sprout(x, case) -> Civilian(case))\nforall x (Name(x, case) -> Pulseless(x))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) and Sprout(x, jules) -> Name(x, case))\nforall x (Name(x, case) -> Name(x, jules))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) and Name(x, jules) -> Sprout(x, case))\nSprout(case, jules) -> Sprout(jules, case)\nName(jules, case) and Raiseable(case) -> Bipolar(jules)\nforall x (Civilian(x) and not Name(x, jules) -> Ingrain(jules, case))\n\nCivilian(case)\n\nName(jules, case) and Raiseable(case) and Name(jules, case) and Raiseable(case) -> Bipolar(jules) -> therefore Bipolar(jules) Name(jules, case) and forall x (Name(x, case) -> Name(x, jules)) -> therefore Name(jules, jules) Bipolar(jules) and Name(jules, jules) and forall x (Bipolar(x) and Name(x, jules) -> Sprout(x, case)) -> therefore Sprout(jules, case) Sprout(jules, case) and forall x (Sprout(x, case) -> Civilian(case)) -> therefore Civilian(case)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The raina attach the rusty. The rusty is propellant. If someone horseshoe the rusty then the rusty is mannered. If someone attach the rusty then they are wholesome. If someone is propellant and they need the raina then they eat the rusty. If someone attach the rusty then they eat the raina. If someone is piggy and they eat the raina then they need the rusty. If the rusty horseshoe the raina then the raina horseshoe the rusty. If the raina attach the rusty and the rusty is propellant then the raina is piggy. If someone is mannered and they do not eat the raina then the raina slush the rusty. The rusty is not mannered.", "logic": "\nAttach(raina, rusty)\nPropellant(rusty)\nforall x (Horseshoe(x, rusty) -> Mannered(rusty))\nforall x (Attach(x, rusty) -> Wholesome(x))\nforall x (Propellant(x) and Horseshoe(x, raina) -> Attach(x, rusty))\nforall x (Attach(x, rusty) -> Attach(x, raina))\nforall x (Piggy(x) and Attach(x, raina) -> Horseshoe(x, rusty))\nHorseshoe(rusty, raina) -> Horseshoe(raina, rusty)\nAttach(raina, rusty) and Propellant(rusty) -> Piggy(raina)\nforall x (Mannered(x) and not Attach(x, raina) -> Slush(raina, rusty))\n\nnot Mannered(rusty)\n\nAttach(raina, rusty) and Propellant(rusty) and Attach(raina, rusty) and Propellant(rusty) -> Piggy(raina) -> therefore Piggy(raina) Attach(raina, rusty) and forall x (Attach(x, rusty) -> Attach(x, raina)) -> therefore Attach(raina, raina) Piggy(raina) and Attach(raina, raina) and forall x (Piggy(x) and Attach(x, raina) -> Horseshoe(x, rusty)) -> therefore Horseshoe(raina, rusty) Horseshoe(raina, rusty) and forall x (Horseshoe(x, rusty) -> Mannered(rusty)) -> therefore Mannered(rusty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The ulric laze the therine. The therine is unstable. If someone test the therine then the therine is mephitic. If someone laze the therine then they are habitable. If someone is unstable and they need the ulric then they eat the therine. If someone laze the therine then they eat the ulric. If someone is unisex and they eat the ulric then they need the therine. If the therine test the ulric then the ulric test the therine. If the ulric laze the therine and the therine is unstable then the ulric is unisex. If someone is mephitic and they do not eat the ulric then the ulric misfire the therine. The therine does not eat the therine.", "logic": "\nLaze(ulric, therine)\nUnstable(therine)\nforall x (Test(x, therine) -> Mephitic(therine))\nforall x (Laze(x, therine) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Unstable(x) and Test(x, ulric) -> Laze(x, therine))\nforall x (Laze(x, therine) -> Laze(x, ulric))\nforall x (Unisex(x) and Laze(x, ulric) -> Test(x, therine))\nTest(therine, ulric) -> Test(ulric, therine)\nLaze(ulric, therine) and Unstable(therine) -> Unisex(ulric)\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and not Laze(x, ulric) -> Misfire(ulric, therine))\n\nnot Laze(therine, therine)\n\nforall x (Unstable(x) and Test(x, ulric) -> Laze(x, therine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The fergus incrust the lilla. The lilla is cosher. If someone infract the lilla then the lilla is menial. If someone incrust the lilla then they are punishable. If someone is cosher and they need the fergus then they eat the lilla. If someone incrust the lilla then they eat the fergus. If someone is serpentine and they eat the fergus then they need the lilla. If the lilla infract the fergus then the fergus infract the lilla. If the fergus incrust the lilla and the lilla is cosher then the fergus is serpentine. If someone is menial and they do not eat the fergus then the fergus reevaluate the lilla. The lilla infract the lilla.", "logic": "\nIncrust(fergus, lilla)\nCosher(lilla)\nforall x (Infract(x, lilla) -> Menial(lilla))\nforall x (Incrust(x, lilla) -> Punishable(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) and Infract(x, fergus) -> Incrust(x, lilla))\nforall x (Incrust(x, lilla) -> Incrust(x, fergus))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) and Incrust(x, fergus) -> Infract(x, lilla))\nInfract(lilla, fergus) -> Infract(fergus, lilla)\nIncrust(fergus, lilla) and Cosher(lilla) -> Serpentine(fergus)\nforall x (Menial(x) and not Incrust(x, fergus) -> Reevaluate(fergus, lilla))\n\nInfract(lilla, lilla)\n\nforall x (Serpentine(x) and Incrust(x, fergus) -> Infract(x, lilla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The fabio notarise the brady. The brady is dished. If someone oscillate the brady then the brady is caecilian. If someone notarise the brady then they are sapphirine. If someone is dished and they need the fabio then they eat the brady. If someone notarise the brady then they eat the fabio. If someone is mocking and they eat the fabio then they need the brady. If the brady oscillate the fabio then the fabio oscillate the brady. If the fabio notarise the brady and the brady is dished then the fabio is mocking. If someone is caecilian and they do not eat the fabio then the fabio extradite the brady. The brady does not eat the fabio.", "logic": "\nNotarise(fabio, brady)\nDished(brady)\nforall x (Oscillate(x, brady) -> Caecilian(brady))\nforall x (Notarise(x, brady) -> Sapphirine(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) and Oscillate(x, fabio) -> Notarise(x, brady))\nforall x (Notarise(x, brady) -> Notarise(x, fabio))\nforall x (Mocking(x) and Notarise(x, fabio) -> Oscillate(x, brady))\nOscillate(brady, fabio) -> Oscillate(fabio, brady)\nNotarise(fabio, brady) and Dished(brady) -> Mocking(fabio)\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and not Notarise(x, fabio) -> Extradite(fabio, brady))\n\nnot Notarise(brady, fabio)\n\nforall x (Notarise(x, brady) -> Notarise(x, fabio)) <- forall x (Dished(x) and Oscillate(x, fabio) -> Notarise(x, brady)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The simona congest the bianca. The bianca is pursuant. If someone deflect the bianca then the bianca is anabolic. If someone congest the bianca then they are couchant. If someone is pursuant and they need the simona then they eat the bianca. If someone congest the bianca then they eat the simona. If someone is micro and they eat the simona then they need the bianca. If the bianca deflect the simona then the simona deflect the bianca. If the simona congest the bianca and the bianca is pursuant then the simona is micro. If someone is anabolic and they do not eat the simona then the simona plagiarise the bianca. The simona plagiarise the bianca.", "logic": "\nCongest(simona, bianca)\nPursuant(bianca)\nforall x (Deflect(x, bianca) -> Anabolic(bianca))\nforall x (Congest(x, bianca) -> Couchant(x))\nforall x (Pursuant(x) and Deflect(x, simona) -> Congest(x, bianca))\nforall x (Congest(x, bianca) -> Congest(x, simona))\nforall x (Micro(x) and Congest(x, simona) -> Deflect(x, bianca))\nDeflect(bianca, simona) -> Deflect(simona, bianca)\nCongest(simona, bianca) and Pursuant(bianca) -> Micro(simona)\nforall x (Anabolic(x) and not Congest(x, simona) -> Plagiarise(simona, bianca))\n\nPlagiarise(simona, bianca)\n\nforall x (Anabolic(x) and not Congest(x, simona) -> Plagiarise(simona, bianca)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The catie mortify the aub. The aub is equal. If someone slope the aub then the aub is ghostly. If someone mortify the aub then they are boric. If someone is equal and they need the catie then they eat the aub. If someone mortify the aub then they eat the catie. If someone is secret and they eat the catie then they need the aub. If the aub slope the catie then the catie slope the aub. If the catie mortify the aub and the aub is equal then the catie is secret. If someone is ghostly and they do not eat the catie then the catie misgive the aub. The catie does not need the catie.", "logic": "\nMortify(catie, aub)\nEqual(aub)\nforall x (Slope(x, aub) -> Ghostly(aub))\nforall x (Mortify(x, aub) -> Boric(x))\nforall x (Equal(x) and Slope(x, catie) -> Mortify(x, aub))\nforall x (Mortify(x, aub) -> Mortify(x, catie))\nforall x (Secret(x) and Mortify(x, catie) -> Slope(x, aub))\nSlope(aub, catie) -> Slope(catie, aub)\nMortify(catie, aub) and Equal(aub) -> Secret(catie)\nforall x (Ghostly(x) and not Mortify(x, catie) -> Misgive(catie, aub))\n\nnot Slope(catie, catie)\n\nnot Slope(catie, catie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The barbara disavow the alysa. The alysa is curatorial. If someone metricate the alysa then the alysa is uncleanly. If someone disavow the alysa then they are thracian. If someone is curatorial and they need the barbara then they eat the alysa. If someone disavow the alysa then they eat the barbara. If someone is fledged and they eat the barbara then they need the alysa. If the alysa metricate the barbara then the barbara metricate the alysa. If the barbara disavow the alysa and the alysa is curatorial then the barbara is fledged. If someone is uncleanly and they do not eat the barbara then the barbara flub the alysa. The alysa flub the barbara.", "logic": "\nDisavow(barbara, alysa)\nCuratorial(alysa)\nforall x (Metricate(x, alysa) -> Uncleanly(alysa))\nforall x (Disavow(x, alysa) -> Thracian(x))\nforall x (Curatorial(x) and Metricate(x, barbara) -> Disavow(x, alysa))\nforall x (Disavow(x, alysa) -> Disavow(x, barbara))\nforall x (Fledged(x) and Disavow(x, barbara) -> Metricate(x, alysa))\nMetricate(alysa, barbara) -> Metricate(barbara, alysa)\nDisavow(barbara, alysa) and Curatorial(alysa) -> Fledged(barbara)\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) and not Disavow(x, barbara) -> Flub(barbara, alysa))\n\nFlub(alysa, barbara)\n\nFlub(alysa, barbara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The meagan license the herold. The herold is tinned. If someone rinse the herold then the herold is coagulable. If someone license the herold then they are filiform. If someone is tinned and they need the meagan then they eat the herold. If someone license the herold then they eat the meagan. If someone is swayback and they eat the meagan then they need the herold. If the herold rinse the meagan then the meagan rinse the herold. If the meagan license the herold and the herold is tinned then the meagan is swayback. If someone is coagulable and they do not eat the meagan then the meagan marvel the herold. The herold does not visit the herold.", "logic": "\nLicense(meagan, herold)\nTinned(herold)\nforall x (Rinse(x, herold) -> Coagulable(herold))\nforall x (License(x, herold) -> Filiform(x))\nforall x (Tinned(x) and Rinse(x, meagan) -> License(x, herold))\nforall x (License(x, herold) -> License(x, meagan))\nforall x (Swayback(x) and License(x, meagan) -> Rinse(x, herold))\nRinse(herold, meagan) -> Rinse(meagan, herold)\nLicense(meagan, herold) and Tinned(herold) -> Swayback(meagan)\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and not License(x, meagan) -> Marvel(meagan, herold))\n\nnot Marvel(herold, herold)\n\nnot Marvel(herold, herold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The miriam conquer the marna. The marna is infinite. If someone anodize the marna then the marna is unexciting. If someone conquer the marna then they are honourable. If someone is infinite and they need the miriam then they eat the marna. If someone conquer the marna then they eat the miriam. If someone is acquirable and they eat the miriam then they need the marna. If the marna anodize the miriam then the miriam anodize the marna. If the miriam conquer the marna and the marna is infinite then the miriam is acquirable. If someone is unexciting and they do not eat the miriam then the miriam leather the marna. The marna anodize the miriam.", "logic": "\nConquer(miriam, marna)\nInfinite(marna)\nforall x (Anodize(x, marna) -> Unexciting(marna))\nforall x (Conquer(x, marna) -> Honourable(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) and Anodize(x, miriam) -> Conquer(x, marna))\nforall x (Conquer(x, marna) -> Conquer(x, miriam))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and Conquer(x, miriam) -> Anodize(x, marna))\nAnodize(marna, miriam) -> Anodize(miriam, marna)\nConquer(miriam, marna) and Infinite(marna) -> Acquirable(miriam)\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and not Conquer(x, miriam) -> Leather(miriam, marna))\n\nAnodize(marna, miriam)\n\nAnodize(marna, miriam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "Cassie is pulverized. Cold people are recurrent. If someone is molten then they are sniffy. White people are sniffy. If Cassie is chelonian and Cassie is pulverized then Cassie is not sniffy. If Cassie is molten and Cassie is recurrent then Cassie is stalkless. White people are molten. If Cassie is not sniffy and Cassie is not stalkless then Cassie is padded. If Cassie is chelonian and Cassie is molten then Cassie is not padded. Cassie is pulverized.", "logic": "\nPulverized(cassie)\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Recurrent(x))\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Sniffy(x))\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> Sniffy(x))\nChelonian(cassie) and Pulverized(cassie) -> not Sniffy(cassie)\nMolten(cassie) and Recurrent(cassie) -> Stalkless(cassie)\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> Molten(x))\nnot Sniffy(cassie) and not Stalkless(cassie) -> Padded(cassie)\nChelonian(cassie) and Molten(cassie) -> not Padded(cassie)\n\nPulverized(cassie)\n\ntherefore Pulverized(cassie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Chan is parvenu. Cold people are numb. If someone is observable then they are ineligible. White people are ineligible. If Chan is prominent and Chan is parvenu then Chan is not ineligible. If Chan is observable and Chan is numb then Chan is ironic. White people are observable. If Chan is not ineligible and Chan is not ironic then Chan is maximizing. If Chan is prominent and Chan is observable then Chan is not maximizing. Chan is not parvenu.", "logic": "\nParvenu(chan)\nforall x (Ineligible(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Observable(x) -> Ineligible(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Ineligible(x))\nProminent(chan) and Parvenu(chan) -> not Ineligible(chan)\nObservable(chan) and Numb(chan) -> Ironic(chan)\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Observable(x))\nnot Ineligible(chan) and not Ironic(chan) -> Maximizing(chan)\nProminent(chan) and Observable(chan) -> not Maximizing(chan)\n\nnot Parvenu(chan)\n\ntherefore Parvenu(chan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Mireille is hungarian. Cold people are quintuple. If someone is spotless then they are unfrozen. White people are unfrozen. If Mireille is blase and Mireille is hungarian then Mireille is not unfrozen. If Mireille is spotless and Mireille is quintuple then Mireille is swaybacked. White people are spotless. If Mireille is not unfrozen and Mireille is not swaybacked then Mireille is enwrapped. If Mireille is blase and Mireille is spotless then Mireille is not enwrapped. Mireille is unfrozen.", "logic": "\nHungarian(mireille)\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Quintuple(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) -> Unfrozen(x))\nforall x (Hungarian(x) -> Unfrozen(x))\nBlase(mireille) and Hungarian(mireille) -> not Unfrozen(mireille)\nSpotless(mireille) and Quintuple(mireille) -> Swaybacked(mireille)\nforall x (Hungarian(x) -> Spotless(x))\nnot Unfrozen(mireille) and not Swaybacked(mireille) -> Enwrapped(mireille)\nBlase(mireille) and Spotless(mireille) -> not Enwrapped(mireille)\n\nUnfrozen(mireille)\n\nHungarian(mireille) and forall x (Hungarian(x) -> Unfrozen(x)) -> therefore Unfrozen(mireille)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Waylan is roomy. Cold people are amniotic. If someone is livid then they are enumerable. White people are enumerable. If Waylan is limber and Waylan is roomy then Waylan is not enumerable. If Waylan is livid and Waylan is amniotic then Waylan is officious. White people are livid. If Waylan is not enumerable and Waylan is not officious then Waylan is untenanted. If Waylan is limber and Waylan is livid then Waylan is not untenanted. Waylan is not enumerable.", "logic": "\nRoomy(waylan)\nforall x (Enumerable(x) -> Amniotic(x))\nforall x (Livid(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Roomy(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nLimber(waylan) and Roomy(waylan) -> not Enumerable(waylan)\nLivid(waylan) and Amniotic(waylan) -> Officious(waylan)\nforall x (Roomy(x) -> Livid(x))\nnot Enumerable(waylan) and not Officious(waylan) -> Untenanted(waylan)\nLimber(waylan) and Livid(waylan) -> not Untenanted(waylan)\n\nnot Enumerable(waylan)\n\nRoomy(waylan) and forall x (Roomy(x) -> Enumerable(x)) -> therefore Enumerable(waylan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Roxine is lamplit. Cold people are tacky. If someone is mozartian then they are magenta. White people are magenta. If Roxine is metastable and Roxine is lamplit then Roxine is not magenta. If Roxine is mozartian and Roxine is tacky then Roxine is syllabled. White people are mozartian. If Roxine is not magenta and Roxine is not syllabled then Roxine is upstairs. If Roxine is metastable and Roxine is mozartian then Roxine is not upstairs. Roxine is tacky.", "logic": "\nLamplit(roxine)\nforall x (Magenta(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Mozartian(x) -> Magenta(x))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> Magenta(x))\nMetastable(roxine) and Lamplit(roxine) -> not Magenta(roxine)\nMozartian(roxine) and Tacky(roxine) -> Syllabled(roxine)\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> Mozartian(x))\nnot Magenta(roxine) and not Syllabled(roxine) -> Upstairs(roxine)\nMetastable(roxine) and Mozartian(roxine) -> not Upstairs(roxine)\n\nTacky(roxine)\n\nLamplit(roxine) and forall x (Lamplit(x) -> Magenta(x)) -> therefore Magenta(roxine) Magenta(roxine) and forall x (Magenta(x) -> Tacky(x)) -> therefore Tacky(roxine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Lee is level. Cold people are defunct. If someone is fractious then they are efferent. White people are efferent. If Lee is magic and Lee is level then Lee is not efferent. If Lee is fractious and Lee is defunct then Lee is protean. White people are fractious. If Lee is not efferent and Lee is not protean then Lee is minimized. If Lee is magic and Lee is fractious then Lee is not minimized. Lee is not defunct.", "logic": "\nLevel(lee)\nforall x (Efferent(x) -> Defunct(x))\nforall x (Fractious(x) -> Efferent(x))\nforall x (Level(x) -> Efferent(x))\nMagic(lee) and Level(lee) -> not Efferent(lee)\nFractious(lee) and Defunct(lee) -> Protean(lee)\nforall x (Level(x) -> Fractious(x))\nnot Efferent(lee) and not Protean(lee) -> Minimized(lee)\nMagic(lee) and Fractious(lee) -> not Minimized(lee)\n\nnot Defunct(lee)\n\nLevel(lee) and forall x (Level(x) -> Efferent(x)) -> therefore Efferent(lee) Efferent(lee) and forall x (Efferent(x) -> Defunct(x)) -> therefore Defunct(lee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Leigh is fatheaded. Cold people are bunglesome. If someone is hewn then they are splenic. White people are splenic. If Leigh is total and Leigh is fatheaded then Leigh is not splenic. If Leigh is hewn and Leigh is bunglesome then Leigh is homonymic. White people are hewn. If Leigh is not splenic and Leigh is not homonymic then Leigh is rear. If Leigh is total and Leigh is hewn then Leigh is not rear. Leigh is homonymic.", "logic": "\nFatheaded(leigh)\nforall x (Splenic(x) -> Bunglesome(x))\nforall x (Hewn(x) -> Splenic(x))\nforall x (Fatheaded(x) -> Splenic(x))\nTotal(leigh) and Fatheaded(leigh) -> not Splenic(leigh)\nHewn(leigh) and Bunglesome(leigh) -> Homonymic(leigh)\nforall x (Fatheaded(x) -> Hewn(x))\nnot Splenic(leigh) and not Homonymic(leigh) -> Rear(leigh)\nTotal(leigh) and Hewn(leigh) -> not Rear(leigh)\n\nHomonymic(leigh)\n\nFatheaded(leigh) and forall x (Fatheaded(x) -> Hewn(x)) -> therefore Hewn(leigh) Fatheaded(leigh) and forall x (Fatheaded(x) -> Splenic(x)) -> therefore Splenic(leigh) Splenic(leigh) and forall x (Splenic(x) -> Bunglesome(x)) -> therefore Bunglesome(leigh) Hewn(leigh) and Bunglesome(leigh) and Hewn(leigh) and Bunglesome(leigh) -> Homonymic(leigh) -> therefore Homonymic(leigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Maddi is alluring. Cold people are mantic. If someone is woebegone then they are advanced. White people are advanced. If Maddi is blowy and Maddi is alluring then Maddi is not advanced. If Maddi is woebegone and Maddi is mantic then Maddi is juristic. White people are woebegone. If Maddi is not advanced and Maddi is not juristic then Maddi is crenulate. If Maddi is blowy and Maddi is woebegone then Maddi is not crenulate. Maddi is not juristic.", "logic": "\nAlluring(maddi)\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Mantic(x))\nforall x (Woebegone(x) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Alluring(x) -> Advanced(x))\nBlowy(maddi) and Alluring(maddi) -> not Advanced(maddi)\nWoebegone(maddi) and Mantic(maddi) -> Juristic(maddi)\nforall x (Alluring(x) -> Woebegone(x))\nnot Advanced(maddi) and not Juristic(maddi) -> Crenulate(maddi)\nBlowy(maddi) and Woebegone(maddi) -> not Crenulate(maddi)\n\nnot Juristic(maddi)\n\nAlluring(maddi) and forall x (Alluring(x) -> Woebegone(x)) -> therefore Woebegone(maddi) Alluring(maddi) and forall x (Alluring(x) -> Advanced(x)) -> therefore Advanced(maddi) Advanced(maddi) and forall x (Advanced(x) -> Mantic(x)) -> therefore Mantic(maddi) Woebegone(maddi) and Mantic(maddi) and Woebegone(maddi) and Mantic(maddi) -> Juristic(maddi) -> therefore Juristic(maddi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Tab is rejective. Cold people are tiresome. If someone is amendable then they are spermatic. White people are spermatic. If Tab is fissile and Tab is rejective then Tab is not spermatic. If Tab is amendable and Tab is tiresome then Tab is sorrel. White people are amendable. If Tab is not spermatic and Tab is not sorrel then Tab is acetylic. If Tab is fissile and Tab is amendable then Tab is not acetylic. Tab is not acetylic.", "logic": "\nRejective(tab)\nforall x (Spermatic(x) -> Tiresome(x))\nforall x (Amendable(x) -> Spermatic(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Spermatic(x))\nFissile(tab) and Rejective(tab) -> not Spermatic(tab)\nAmendable(tab) and Tiresome(tab) -> Sorrel(tab)\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Amendable(x))\nnot Spermatic(tab) and not Sorrel(tab) -> Acetylic(tab)\nFissile(tab) and Amendable(tab) -> not Acetylic(tab)\n\nnot Acetylic(tab)\n\nnot Spermatic(tab) and not Sorrel(tab) -> Acetylic(tab) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Nada is beggarly. Cold people are coruscant. If someone is fifty then they are narial. White people are narial. If Nada is atrip and Nada is beggarly then Nada is not narial. If Nada is fifty and Nada is coruscant then Nada is resistive. White people are fifty. If Nada is not narial and Nada is not resistive then Nada is rude. If Nada is atrip and Nada is fifty then Nada is not rude. Nada is atrip.", "logic": "\nBeggarly(nada)\nforall x (Narial(x) -> Coruscant(x))\nforall x (Fifty(x) -> Narial(x))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Narial(x))\nAtrip(nada) and Beggarly(nada) -> not Narial(nada)\nFifty(nada) and Coruscant(nada) -> Resistive(nada)\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Fifty(x))\nnot Narial(nada) and not Resistive(nada) -> Rude(nada)\nAtrip(nada) and Fifty(nada) -> not Rude(nada)\n\nAtrip(nada)\n\nAtrip(nada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Juliana is binary. Elsie is not cloudlike. Nicoline is unvalued. Nilson is encysted. Round things are not nonelected. If something is nonelected and not unvalued then it is cloudlike. Young things are cloudlike. If something is binary and encysted then it is bilabiate. All unvalued things are bilabiate. If something is cloudlike then it is encysted. If Nilson is bilabiate and Nilson is unvalued then Nilson is encysted. If something is encysted and not nonelected then it is cyclopean. Nilson is encysted.", "logic": "\nBinary(juliana)\nnot Cloudlike(elsie)\nUnvalued(nicoline)\nEncysted(nilson)\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> not Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and not Unvalued(x) -> Cloudlike(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) -> Cloudlike(x))\nforall x (Binary(x) and Encysted(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Cloudlike(x) -> Encysted(x))\nBilabiate(nilson) and Unvalued(nilson) -> Encysted(nilson)\nforall x (Encysted(x) and not Nonelected(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\n\nEncysted(nilson)\n\ntherefore Encysted(nilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Florencia is fond. Delphinia is not brumal. Geoffrey is biggish. Stephanus is stertorous. Round things are not transverse. If something is transverse and not biggish then it is brumal. Young things are brumal. If something is fond and stertorous then it is hasty. All biggish things are hasty. If something is brumal then it is stertorous. If Stephanus is hasty and Stephanus is biggish then Stephanus is stertorous. If something is stertorous and not transverse then it is hebraic. Delphinia is brumal.", "logic": "\nFond(florencia)\nnot Brumal(delphinia)\nBiggish(geoffrey)\nStertorous(stephanus)\nforall x (Hasty(x) -> not Transverse(x))\nforall x (Transverse(x) and not Biggish(x) -> Brumal(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) -> Brumal(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) and Stertorous(x) -> Hasty(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) -> Hasty(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Stertorous(x))\nHasty(stephanus) and Biggish(stephanus) -> Stertorous(stephanus)\nforall x (Stertorous(x) and not Transverse(x) -> Hebraic(x))\n\nBrumal(delphinia)\n\ntherefore not Brumal(delphinia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Maryrose is venerating. Norene is not premature. Bradley is postal. Henrique is taillike. Round things are not blate. If something is blate and not postal then it is premature. Young things are premature. If something is venerating and taillike then it is secretory. All postal things are secretory. If something is premature then it is taillike. If Henrique is secretory and Henrique is postal then Henrique is taillike. If something is taillike and not blate then it is ungummed. Bradley is secretory.", "logic": "\nVenerating(maryrose)\nnot Premature(norene)\nPostal(bradley)\nTaillike(henrique)\nforall x (Secretory(x) -> not Blate(x))\nforall x (Blate(x) and not Postal(x) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Venerating(x) and Taillike(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Premature(x) -> Taillike(x))\nSecretory(henrique) and Postal(henrique) -> Taillike(henrique)\nforall x (Taillike(x) and not Blate(x) -> Ungummed(x))\n\nSecretory(bradley)\n\nPostal(bradley) and forall x (Postal(x) -> Secretory(x)) -> therefore Secretory(bradley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Bobbette is bleak. Bryna is not cerous. Garnet is strong. Mort is ironical. Round things are not idolatrous. If something is idolatrous and not strong then it is cerous. Young things are cerous. If something is bleak and ironical then it is petaloid. All strong things are petaloid. If something is cerous then it is ironical. If Mort is petaloid and Mort is strong then Mort is ironical. If something is ironical and not idolatrous then it is panicky. Garnet is not cerous.", "logic": "\nBleak(bobbette)\nnot Cerous(bryna)\nStrong(garnet)\nIronical(mort)\nforall x (Petaloid(x) -> not Idolatrous(x))\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) and not Strong(x) -> Cerous(x))\nforall x (Strong(x) -> Cerous(x))\nforall x (Bleak(x) and Ironical(x) -> Petaloid(x))\nforall x (Strong(x) -> Petaloid(x))\nforall x (Cerous(x) -> Ironical(x))\nPetaloid(mort) and Strong(mort) -> Ironical(mort)\nforall x (Ironical(x) and not Idolatrous(x) -> Panicky(x))\n\nnot Cerous(garnet)\n\nStrong(garnet) and forall x (Strong(x) -> Cerous(x)) -> therefore Cerous(garnet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Rachelle is sandlike. Bethanne is not timeless. Kristen is unpatented. William is wroth. Round things are not amylolytic. If something is amylolytic and not unpatented then it is timeless. Young things are timeless. If something is sandlike and wroth then it is fourscore. All unpatented things are fourscore. If something is timeless then it is wroth. If William is fourscore and William is unpatented then William is wroth. If something is wroth and not amylolytic then it is interstate. Kristen is wroth.", "logic": "\nSandlike(rachelle)\nnot Timeless(bethanne)\nUnpatented(kristen)\nWroth(william)\nforall x (Fourscore(x) -> not Amylolytic(x))\nforall x (Amylolytic(x) and not Unpatented(x) -> Timeless(x))\nforall x (Unpatented(x) -> Timeless(x))\nforall x (Sandlike(x) and Wroth(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Unpatented(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Timeless(x) -> Wroth(x))\nFourscore(william) and Unpatented(william) -> Wroth(william)\nforall x (Wroth(x) and not Amylolytic(x) -> Interstate(x))\n\nWroth(kristen)\n\nUnpatented(kristen) and forall x (Unpatented(x) -> Timeless(x)) -> therefore Timeless(kristen) Timeless(kristen) and forall x (Timeless(x) -> Wroth(x)) -> therefore Wroth(kristen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Pattie is flooded. Allina is not internal. Lurlene is bipinnate. Layney is immanent. Round things are not difficult. If something is difficult and not bipinnate then it is internal. Young things are internal. If something is flooded and immanent then it is diacritic. All bipinnate things are diacritic. If something is internal then it is immanent. If Layney is diacritic and Layney is bipinnate then Layney is immanent. If something is immanent and not difficult then it is uncomplete. Lurlene is not immanent.", "logic": "\nFlooded(pattie)\nnot Internal(allina)\nBipinnate(lurlene)\nImmanent(layney)\nforall x (Diacritic(x) -> not Difficult(x))\nforall x (Difficult(x) and not Bipinnate(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Bipinnate(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Flooded(x) and Immanent(x) -> Diacritic(x))\nforall x (Bipinnate(x) -> Diacritic(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) -> Immanent(x))\nDiacritic(layney) and Bipinnate(layney) -> Immanent(layney)\nforall x (Immanent(x) and not Difficult(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\n\nnot Immanent(lurlene)\n\nBipinnate(lurlene) and forall x (Bipinnate(x) -> Internal(x)) -> therefore Internal(lurlene) Internal(lurlene) and forall x (Internal(x) -> Immanent(x)) -> therefore Immanent(lurlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Eldon is cheeselike. Sophey is not snorty. Katy is checked. Gwyneth is anesthetic. Round things are not crank. If something is crank and not checked then it is snorty. Young things are snorty. If something is cheeselike and anesthetic then it is twisted. All checked things are twisted. If something is snorty then it is anesthetic. If Gwyneth is twisted and Gwyneth is checked then Gwyneth is anesthetic. If something is anesthetic and not crank then it is epiphytic. Katy is epiphytic.", "logic": "\nCheeselike(eldon)\nnot Snorty(sophey)\nChecked(katy)\nAnesthetic(gwyneth)\nforall x (Twisted(x) -> not Crank(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) and not Checked(x) -> Snorty(x))\nforall x (Checked(x) -> Snorty(x))\nforall x (Cheeselike(x) and Anesthetic(x) -> Twisted(x))\nforall x (Checked(x) -> Twisted(x))\nforall x (Snorty(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nTwisted(gwyneth) and Checked(gwyneth) -> Anesthetic(gwyneth)\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) and not Crank(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\n\nEpiphytic(katy)\n\nChecked(katy) and forall x (Checked(x) -> Snorty(x)) -> therefore Snorty(katy) Snorty(katy) and forall x (Snorty(x) -> Anesthetic(x)) -> therefore Anesthetic(katy) Checked(katy) and forall x (Checked(x) -> Twisted(x)) -> therefore Twisted(katy) Twisted(katy) and forall x (Twisted(x) -> not Crank(x)) -> therefore not Crank(katy) Anesthetic(katy) and not Crank(katy) and forall x (Anesthetic(x) and not Crank(x) -> Epiphytic(x)) -> therefore Epiphytic(katy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Desaree is excitable. Joanie is not prime. Zitella is adaptative. Ailene is acronymous. Round things are not kyphotic. If something is kyphotic and not adaptative then it is prime. Young things are prime. If something is excitable and acronymous then it is desultory. All adaptative things are desultory. If something is prime then it is acronymous. If Ailene is desultory and Ailene is adaptative then Ailene is acronymous. If something is acronymous and not kyphotic then it is aspherical. Zitella is not aspherical.", "logic": "\nExcitable(desaree)\nnot Prime(joanie)\nAdaptative(zitella)\nAcronymous(ailene)\nforall x (Desultory(x) -> not Kyphotic(x))\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) and not Adaptative(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Excitable(x) and Acronymous(x) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Prime(x) -> Acronymous(x))\nDesultory(ailene) and Adaptative(ailene) -> Acronymous(ailene)\nforall x (Acronymous(x) and not Kyphotic(x) -> Aspherical(x))\n\nnot Aspherical(zitella)\n\nAdaptative(zitella) and forall x (Adaptative(x) -> Prime(x)) -> therefore Prime(zitella) Prime(zitella) and forall x (Prime(x) -> Acronymous(x)) -> therefore Acronymous(zitella) Adaptative(zitella) and forall x (Adaptative(x) -> Desultory(x)) -> therefore Desultory(zitella) Desultory(zitella) and forall x (Desultory(x) -> not Kyphotic(x)) -> therefore not Kyphotic(zitella) Acronymous(zitella) and not Kyphotic(zitella) and forall x (Acronymous(x) and not Kyphotic(x) -> Aspherical(x)) -> therefore Aspherical(zitella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Deina is clathrate. Candy is not untrue. Nickie is entozoan. Joceline is avellane. Round things are not dried. If something is dried and not entozoan then it is untrue. Young things are untrue. If something is clathrate and avellane then it is amerciable. All entozoan things are amerciable. If something is untrue then it is avellane. If Joceline is amerciable and Joceline is entozoan then Joceline is avellane. If something is avellane and not dried then it is outmoded. Joceline is not untrue.", "logic": "\nClathrate(deina)\nnot Untrue(candy)\nEntozoan(nickie)\nAvellane(joceline)\nforall x (Amerciable(x) -> not Dried(x))\nforall x (Dried(x) and not Entozoan(x) -> Untrue(x))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Untrue(x))\nforall x (Clathrate(x) and Avellane(x) -> Amerciable(x))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Amerciable(x))\nforall x (Untrue(x) -> Avellane(x))\nAmerciable(joceline) and Entozoan(joceline) -> Avellane(joceline)\nforall x (Avellane(x) and not Dried(x) -> Outmoded(x))\n\nnot Untrue(joceline)\n\nforall x (Dried(x) and not Entozoan(x) -> Untrue(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Brendan is persistent. Susann is not staring. Jackson is invaluable. Hadleigh is lemonlike. Round things are not satellite. If something is satellite and not invaluable then it is staring. Young things are staring. If something is persistent and lemonlike then it is hebrew. All invaluable things are hebrew. If something is staring then it is lemonlike. If Hadleigh is hebrew and Hadleigh is invaluable then Hadleigh is lemonlike. If something is lemonlike and not satellite then it is unceasing. Hadleigh is hebrew.", "logic": "\nPersistent(brendan)\nnot Staring(susann)\nInvaluable(jackson)\nLemonlike(hadleigh)\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> not Satellite(x))\nforall x (Satellite(x) and not Invaluable(x) -> Staring(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Staring(x))\nforall x (Persistent(x) and Lemonlike(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nforall x (Staring(x) -> Lemonlike(x))\nHebrew(hadleigh) and Invaluable(hadleigh) -> Lemonlike(hadleigh)\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) and not Satellite(x) -> Unceasing(x))\n\nHebrew(hadleigh)\n\nforall x (Persistent(x) and Lemonlike(x) -> Hebrew(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Thatcher is fistulate. Barrett is not anisogamic. Stafani is lethal. Giraldo is small. Round things are not colonic. If something is colonic and not lethal then it is anisogamic. Young things are anisogamic. If something is fistulate and small then it is trihydroxy. All lethal things are trihydroxy. If something is anisogamic then it is small. If Giraldo is trihydroxy and Giraldo is lethal then Giraldo is small. If something is small and not colonic then it is buckram. Thatcher is not small.", "logic": "\nFistulate(thatcher)\nnot Anisogamic(barrett)\nLethal(stafani)\nSmall(giraldo)\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> not Colonic(x))\nforall x (Colonic(x) and not Lethal(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Lethal(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Fistulate(x) and Small(x) -> Trihydroxy(x))\nforall x (Lethal(x) -> Trihydroxy(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Small(x))\nTrihydroxy(giraldo) and Lethal(giraldo) -> Small(giraldo)\nforall x (Small(x) and not Colonic(x) -> Buckram(x))\n\nnot Small(thatcher)\n\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Small(x)) <- forall x (Colonic(x) and not Lethal(x) -> Anisogamic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Jerrome is entrancing. Letty is not diamantine. Robbie is joking. Bella is giant. Round things are not beaded. If something is beaded and not joking then it is diamantine. Young things are diamantine. If something is entrancing and giant then it is lilting. All joking things are lilting. If something is diamantine then it is giant. If Bella is lilting and Bella is joking then Bella is giant. If something is giant and not beaded then it is perilous. Bella is perilous.", "logic": "\nEntrancing(jerrome)\nnot Diamantine(letty)\nJoking(robbie)\nGiant(bella)\nforall x (Lilting(x) -> not Beaded(x))\nforall x (Beaded(x) and not Joking(x) -> Diamantine(x))\nforall x (Joking(x) -> Diamantine(x))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) and Giant(x) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Joking(x) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) -> Giant(x))\nLilting(bella) and Joking(bella) -> Giant(bella)\nforall x (Giant(x) and not Beaded(x) -> Perilous(x))\n\nPerilous(bella)\n\nforall x (Giant(x) and not Beaded(x) -> Perilous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Mandie is squawky. Ender is not mental. Clovis is pistillate. Lavinie is ruined. Round things are not prideful. If something is prideful and not pistillate then it is mental. Young things are mental. If something is squawky and ruined then it is overfull. All pistillate things are overfull. If something is mental then it is ruined. If Lavinie is overfull and Lavinie is pistillate then Lavinie is ruined. If something is ruined and not prideful then it is voteless. Ender is not squawky.", "logic": "\nSquawky(mandie)\nnot Mental(ender)\nPistillate(clovis)\nRuined(lavinie)\nforall x (Overfull(x) -> not Prideful(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) and not Pistillate(x) -> Mental(x))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) -> Mental(x))\nforall x (Squawky(x) and Ruined(x) -> Overfull(x))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) -> Overfull(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) -> Ruined(x))\nOverfull(lavinie) and Pistillate(lavinie) -> Ruined(lavinie)\nforall x (Ruined(x) and not Prideful(x) -> Voteless(x))\n\nnot Squawky(ender)\n\nnot Squawky(ender) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Cristi is accessory. Zeke is not mournful. Angelica is edacious. Atlante is extravert. Round things are not shavian. If something is shavian and not edacious then it is mournful. Young things are mournful. If something is accessory and extravert then it is famed. All edacious things are famed. If something is mournful then it is extravert. If Atlante is famed and Atlante is edacious then Atlante is extravert. If something is extravert and not shavian then it is vertebral. Zeke is shavian.", "logic": "\nAccessory(cristi)\nnot Mournful(zeke)\nEdacious(angelica)\nExtravert(atlante)\nforall x (Famed(x) -> not Shavian(x))\nforall x (Shavian(x) and not Edacious(x) -> Mournful(x))\nforall x (Edacious(x) -> Mournful(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Extravert(x) -> Famed(x))\nforall x (Edacious(x) -> Famed(x))\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Extravert(x))\nFamed(atlante) and Edacious(atlante) -> Extravert(atlante)\nforall x (Extravert(x) and not Shavian(x) -> Vertebral(x))\n\nShavian(zeke)\n\nShavian(zeke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Chery is beltlike. Shimon is not anginal. Sadie is unopen. Randee is racial. Round things are not nationwide. If something is nationwide and not unopen then it is anginal. Young things are anginal. If something is beltlike and racial then it is disparate. All unopen things are disparate. If something is anginal then it is racial. If Randee is disparate and Randee is unopen then Randee is racial. If something is racial and not nationwide then it is discovered. Shimon is not unopen.", "logic": "\nBeltlike(chery)\nnot Anginal(shimon)\nUnopen(sadie)\nRacial(randee)\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> not Nationwide(x))\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and not Unopen(x) -> Anginal(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) -> Anginal(x))\nforall x (Beltlike(x) and Racial(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Anginal(x) -> Racial(x))\nDisparate(randee) and Unopen(randee) -> Racial(randee)\nforall x (Racial(x) and not Nationwide(x) -> Discovered(x))\n\nnot Unopen(shimon)\n\nnot Unopen(shimon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Nikki is speedy. Shorty is not moneran. Halie is candid. Kira is seamanly. Round things are not hebridean. If something is hebridean and not candid then it is moneran. Young things are moneran. If something is speedy and seamanly then it is solved. All candid things are solved. If something is moneran then it is seamanly. If Kira is solved and Kira is candid then Kira is seamanly. If something is seamanly and not hebridean then it is phagocytic. Nikki is candid.", "logic": "\nSpeedy(nikki)\nnot Moneran(shorty)\nCandid(halie)\nSeamanly(kira)\nforall x (Solved(x) -> not Hebridean(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and not Candid(x) -> Moneran(x))\nforall x (Candid(x) -> Moneran(x))\nforall x (Speedy(x) and Seamanly(x) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Candid(x) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) -> Seamanly(x))\nSolved(kira) and Candid(kira) -> Seamanly(kira)\nforall x (Seamanly(x) and not Hebridean(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\n\nCandid(nikki)\n\nCandid(nikki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "The arlee sorrow the bunny. The arlee is profuse. The arlee is correlate. The arlee is total. The arlee is avian. The arlee is wheelless. The arlee vellicate the bunny. The arlee protect the bunny. The bunny sorrow the arlee. The bunny is profuse. The bunny is correlate. The bunny is total. The bunny is avian. The bunny is wheelless. The bunny vellicate the arlee. The bunny protect the arlee. If someone vellicate the bunny and they visit the arlee then the arlee vellicate the bunny. If someone vellicate the arlee and the arlee is avian then they see the bunny. If someone protect the bunny and the bunny vellicate the arlee then they eat the bunny. If someone is profuse and they eat the arlee then the arlee sorrow the bunny. If someone vellicate the bunny then they visit the bunny. If someone is profuse then they see the bunny. If someone protect the bunny and the bunny sorrow the arlee then they are profuse. If someone sorrow the arlee and the arlee sorrow the bunny then the bunny sorrow the arlee. The bunny is profuse.", "logic": "\nSorrow(arlee, bunny)\nProfuse(arlee)\nCorrelate(arlee)\nTotal(arlee)\nAvian(arlee)\nWheelless(arlee)\nVellicate(arlee, bunny)\nProtect(arlee, bunny)\nSorrow(bunny, arlee)\nProfuse(bunny)\nCorrelate(bunny)\nTotal(bunny)\nAvian(bunny)\nWheelless(bunny)\nVellicate(bunny, arlee)\nProtect(bunny, arlee)\nforall x (Vellicate(x, bunny) and Protect(x, arlee) -> Vellicate(arlee, bunny))\nforall x (Vellicate(x, arlee) and Avian(arlee) -> Vellicate(x, bunny))\nforall x (Protect(x, bunny) and Vellicate(bunny, arlee) -> Sorrow(x, bunny))\nforall x (Profuse(x) and Sorrow(x, arlee) -> Sorrow(arlee, bunny))\nforall x (Vellicate(x, bunny) -> Protect(x, bunny))\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Vellicate(x, bunny))\nforall x (Protect(x, bunny) and Sorrow(bunny, arlee) -> Profuse(x))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, arlee) and Sorrow(arlee, bunny) -> Sorrow(bunny, arlee))\n\nProfuse(bunny)\n\ntherefore Profuse(bunny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The elonore quiet the alvin. The elonore is excitable. The elonore is indefinite. The elonore is millennial. The elonore is hasty. The elonore is indefinite. The elonore shrivel the alvin. The elonore throttle the alvin. The alvin quiet the elonore. The alvin is excitable. The alvin is indefinite. The alvin is millennial. The alvin is hasty. The alvin is indefinite. The alvin shrivel the elonore. The alvin throttle the elonore. If someone shrivel the alvin and they visit the elonore then the elonore shrivel the alvin. If someone shrivel the elonore and the elonore is hasty then they see the alvin. If someone throttle the alvin and the alvin shrivel the elonore then they eat the alvin. If someone is excitable and they eat the elonore then the elonore quiet the alvin. If someone shrivel the alvin then they visit the alvin. If someone is excitable then they see the alvin. If someone throttle the alvin and the alvin quiet the elonore then they are excitable. If someone quiet the elonore and the elonore quiet the alvin then the alvin quiet the elonore. The alvin does not eat the elonore.", "logic": "\nQuiet(elonore, alvin)\nExcitable(elonore)\nIndefinite(elonore)\nMillennial(elonore)\nHasty(elonore)\nIndefinite(elonore)\nShrivel(elonore, alvin)\nThrottle(elonore, alvin)\nQuiet(alvin, elonore)\nExcitable(alvin)\nIndefinite(alvin)\nMillennial(alvin)\nHasty(alvin)\nIndefinite(alvin)\nShrivel(alvin, elonore)\nThrottle(alvin, elonore)\nforall x (Shrivel(x, alvin) and Throttle(x, elonore) -> Shrivel(elonore, alvin))\nforall x (Shrivel(x, elonore) and Hasty(elonore) -> Shrivel(x, alvin))\nforall x (Throttle(x, alvin) and Shrivel(alvin, elonore) -> Quiet(x, alvin))\nforall x (Excitable(x) and Quiet(x, elonore) -> Quiet(elonore, alvin))\nforall x (Shrivel(x, alvin) -> Throttle(x, alvin))\nforall x (Excitable(x) -> Shrivel(x, alvin))\nforall x (Throttle(x, alvin) and Quiet(alvin, elonore) -> Excitable(x))\nforall x (Quiet(x, elonore) and Quiet(elonore, alvin) -> Quiet(alvin, elonore))\n\nnot Quiet(alvin, elonore)\n\ntherefore Quiet(alvin, elonore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The brittney mouth the cristina. The brittney is visualised. The brittney is grassless. The brittney is oratorical. The brittney is subjective. The brittney is chubby. The brittney view the cristina. The brittney trust the cristina. The cristina mouth the brittney. The cristina is visualised. The cristina is grassless. The cristina is oratorical. The cristina is subjective. The cristina is chubby. The cristina view the brittney. The cristina trust the brittney. If someone view the cristina and they visit the brittney then the brittney view the cristina. If someone view the brittney and the brittney is subjective then they see the cristina. If someone trust the cristina and the cristina view the brittney then they eat the cristina. If someone is visualised and they eat the brittney then the brittney mouth the cristina. If someone view the cristina then they visit the cristina. If someone is visualised then they see the cristina. If someone trust the cristina and the cristina mouth the brittney then they are visualised. If someone mouth the brittney and the brittney mouth the cristina then the cristina mouth the brittney. The cristina view the cristina.", "logic": "\nMouth(brittney, cristina)\nVisualised(brittney)\nGrassless(brittney)\nOratorical(brittney)\nSubjective(brittney)\nChubby(brittney)\nView(brittney, cristina)\nTrust(brittney, cristina)\nMouth(cristina, brittney)\nVisualised(cristina)\nGrassless(cristina)\nOratorical(cristina)\nSubjective(cristina)\nChubby(cristina)\nView(cristina, brittney)\nTrust(cristina, brittney)\nforall x (View(x, cristina) and Trust(x, brittney) -> View(brittney, cristina))\nforall x (View(x, brittney) and Subjective(brittney) -> View(x, cristina))\nforall x (Trust(x, cristina) and View(cristina, brittney) -> Mouth(x, cristina))\nforall x (Visualised(x) and Mouth(x, brittney) -> Mouth(brittney, cristina))\nforall x (View(x, cristina) -> Trust(x, cristina))\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> View(x, cristina))\nforall x (Trust(x, cristina) and Mouth(cristina, brittney) -> Visualised(x))\nforall x (Mouth(x, brittney) and Mouth(brittney, cristina) -> Mouth(cristina, brittney))\n\nView(cristina, cristina)\n\nVisualised(cristina) and forall x (Visualised(x) -> View(x, cristina)) -> therefore View(cristina, cristina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The glenn renew the lani. The glenn is ongoing. The glenn is flaunty. The glenn is serene. The glenn is cataphatic. The glenn is barren. The glenn overleap the lani. The glenn irradiate the lani. The lani renew the glenn. The lani is ongoing. The lani is flaunty. The lani is serene. The lani is cataphatic. The lani is barren. The lani overleap the glenn. The lani irradiate the glenn. If someone overleap the lani and they visit the glenn then the glenn overleap the lani. If someone overleap the glenn and the glenn is cataphatic then they see the lani. If someone irradiate the lani and the lani overleap the glenn then they eat the lani. If someone is ongoing and they eat the glenn then the glenn renew the lani. If someone overleap the lani then they visit the lani. If someone is ongoing then they see the lani. If someone irradiate the lani and the lani renew the glenn then they are ongoing. If someone renew the glenn and the glenn renew the lani then the lani renew the glenn. The lani does not see the lani.", "logic": "\nRenew(glenn, lani)\nOngoing(glenn)\nFlaunty(glenn)\nSerene(glenn)\nCataphatic(glenn)\nBarren(glenn)\nOverleap(glenn, lani)\nIrradiate(glenn, lani)\nRenew(lani, glenn)\nOngoing(lani)\nFlaunty(lani)\nSerene(lani)\nCataphatic(lani)\nBarren(lani)\nOverleap(lani, glenn)\nIrradiate(lani, glenn)\nforall x (Overleap(x, lani) and Irradiate(x, glenn) -> Overleap(glenn, lani))\nforall x (Overleap(x, glenn) and Cataphatic(glenn) -> Overleap(x, lani))\nforall x (Irradiate(x, lani) and Overleap(lani, glenn) -> Renew(x, lani))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) and Renew(x, glenn) -> Renew(glenn, lani))\nforall x (Overleap(x, lani) -> Irradiate(x, lani))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Overleap(x, lani))\nforall x (Irradiate(x, lani) and Renew(lani, glenn) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Renew(x, glenn) and Renew(glenn, lani) -> Renew(lani, glenn))\n\nnot Overleap(lani, lani)\n\nOngoing(lani) and forall x (Ongoing(x) -> Overleap(x, lani)) -> therefore Overleap(lani, lani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The reggis harmonize the angelle. The reggis is crapulent. The reggis is prone. The reggis is steepish. The reggis is sibilant. The reggis is neuromotor. The reggis caterwaul the angelle. The reggis boggle the angelle. The angelle harmonize the reggis. The angelle is crapulent. The angelle is prone. The angelle is steepish. The angelle is sibilant. The angelle is neuromotor. The angelle caterwaul the reggis. The angelle boggle the reggis. If someone caterwaul the angelle and they visit the reggis then the reggis caterwaul the angelle. If someone caterwaul the reggis and the reggis is sibilant then they see the angelle. If someone boggle the angelle and the angelle caterwaul the reggis then they eat the angelle. If someone is crapulent and they eat the reggis then the reggis harmonize the angelle. If someone caterwaul the angelle then they visit the angelle. If someone is crapulent then they see the angelle. If someone boggle the angelle and the angelle harmonize the reggis then they are crapulent. If someone harmonize the reggis and the reggis harmonize the angelle then the angelle harmonize the reggis. The angelle boggle the angelle.", "logic": "\nHarmonize(reggis, angelle)\nCrapulent(reggis)\nProne(reggis)\nSteepish(reggis)\nSibilant(reggis)\nNeuromotor(reggis)\nCaterwaul(reggis, angelle)\nBoggle(reggis, angelle)\nHarmonize(angelle, reggis)\nCrapulent(angelle)\nProne(angelle)\nSteepish(angelle)\nSibilant(angelle)\nNeuromotor(angelle)\nCaterwaul(angelle, reggis)\nBoggle(angelle, reggis)\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, angelle) and Boggle(x, reggis) -> Caterwaul(reggis, angelle))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, reggis) and Sibilant(reggis) -> Caterwaul(x, angelle))\nforall x (Boggle(x, angelle) and Caterwaul(angelle, reggis) -> Harmonize(x, angelle))\nforall x (Crapulent(x) and Harmonize(x, reggis) -> Harmonize(reggis, angelle))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, angelle) -> Boggle(x, angelle))\nforall x (Crapulent(x) -> Caterwaul(x, angelle))\nforall x (Boggle(x, angelle) and Harmonize(angelle, reggis) -> Crapulent(x))\nforall x (Harmonize(x, reggis) and Harmonize(reggis, angelle) -> Harmonize(angelle, reggis))\n\nBoggle(angelle, angelle)\n\nCrapulent(angelle) and forall x (Crapulent(x) -> Caterwaul(x, angelle)) -> therefore Caterwaul(angelle, angelle) Caterwaul(angelle, angelle) and forall x (Caterwaul(x, angelle) -> Boggle(x, angelle)) -> therefore Boggle(angelle, angelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The anallise roughhouse the merwin. The anallise is lanate. The anallise is membranous. The anallise is linear. The anallise is triclinic. The anallise is mastoidal. The anallise ware the merwin. The anallise unite the merwin. The merwin roughhouse the anallise. The merwin is lanate. The merwin is membranous. The merwin is linear. The merwin is triclinic. The merwin is mastoidal. The merwin ware the anallise. The merwin unite the anallise. If someone ware the merwin and they visit the anallise then the anallise ware the merwin. If someone ware the anallise and the anallise is triclinic then they see the merwin. If someone unite the merwin and the merwin ware the anallise then they eat the merwin. If someone is lanate and they eat the anallise then the anallise roughhouse the merwin. If someone ware the merwin then they visit the merwin. If someone is lanate then they see the merwin. If someone unite the merwin and the merwin roughhouse the anallise then they are lanate. If someone roughhouse the anallise and the anallise roughhouse the merwin then the merwin roughhouse the anallise. The merwin does not visit the merwin.", "logic": "\nRoughhouse(anallise, merwin)\nLanate(anallise)\nMembranous(anallise)\nLinear(anallise)\nTriclinic(anallise)\nMastoidal(anallise)\nWare(anallise, merwin)\nUnite(anallise, merwin)\nRoughhouse(merwin, anallise)\nLanate(merwin)\nMembranous(merwin)\nLinear(merwin)\nTriclinic(merwin)\nMastoidal(merwin)\nWare(merwin, anallise)\nUnite(merwin, anallise)\nforall x (Ware(x, merwin) and Unite(x, anallise) -> Ware(anallise, merwin))\nforall x (Ware(x, anallise) and Triclinic(anallise) -> Ware(x, merwin))\nforall x (Unite(x, merwin) and Ware(merwin, anallise) -> Roughhouse(x, merwin))\nforall x (Lanate(x) and Roughhouse(x, anallise) -> Roughhouse(anallise, merwin))\nforall x (Ware(x, merwin) -> Unite(x, merwin))\nforall x (Lanate(x) -> Ware(x, merwin))\nforall x (Unite(x, merwin) and Roughhouse(merwin, anallise) -> Lanate(x))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, anallise) and Roughhouse(anallise, merwin) -> Roughhouse(merwin, anallise))\n\nnot Unite(merwin, merwin)\n\nLanate(merwin) and forall x (Lanate(x) -> Ware(x, merwin)) -> therefore Ware(merwin, merwin) Ware(merwin, merwin) and forall x (Ware(x, merwin) -> Unite(x, merwin)) -> therefore Unite(merwin, merwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The thedrick turtle the otho. The thedrick is hybrid. The thedrick is threadbare. The thedrick is beery. The thedrick is turkmen. The thedrick is patchy. The thedrick scrimmage the otho. The thedrick cheapen the otho. The otho turtle the thedrick. The otho is hybrid. The otho is threadbare. The otho is beery. The otho is turkmen. The otho is patchy. The otho scrimmage the thedrick. The otho cheapen the thedrick. If someone scrimmage the otho and they visit the thedrick then the thedrick scrimmage the otho. If someone scrimmage the thedrick and the thedrick is turkmen then they see the otho. If someone cheapen the otho and the otho scrimmage the thedrick then they eat the otho. If someone is hybrid and they eat the thedrick then the thedrick turtle the otho. If someone scrimmage the otho then they visit the otho. If someone is hybrid then they see the otho. If someone cheapen the otho and the otho turtle the thedrick then they are hybrid. If someone turtle the thedrick and the thedrick turtle the otho then the otho turtle the thedrick. The otho turtle the otho.", "logic": "\nTurtle(thedrick, otho)\nHybrid(thedrick)\nThreadbare(thedrick)\nBeery(thedrick)\nTurkmen(thedrick)\nPatchy(thedrick)\nScrimmage(thedrick, otho)\nCheapen(thedrick, otho)\nTurtle(otho, thedrick)\nHybrid(otho)\nThreadbare(otho)\nBeery(otho)\nTurkmen(otho)\nPatchy(otho)\nScrimmage(otho, thedrick)\nCheapen(otho, thedrick)\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, otho) and Cheapen(x, thedrick) -> Scrimmage(thedrick, otho))\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, thedrick) and Turkmen(thedrick) -> Scrimmage(x, otho))\nforall x (Cheapen(x, otho) and Scrimmage(otho, thedrick) -> Turtle(x, otho))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) and Turtle(x, thedrick) -> Turtle(thedrick, otho))\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, otho) -> Cheapen(x, otho))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) -> Scrimmage(x, otho))\nforall x (Cheapen(x, otho) and Turtle(otho, thedrick) -> Hybrid(x))\nforall x (Turtle(x, thedrick) and Turtle(thedrick, otho) -> Turtle(otho, thedrick))\n\nTurtle(otho, otho)\n\nHybrid(otho) and forall x (Hybrid(x) -> Scrimmage(x, otho)) -> therefore Scrimmage(otho, otho) Scrimmage(otho, otho) and forall x (Scrimmage(x, otho) -> Cheapen(x, otho)) -> therefore Cheapen(otho, otho) Cheapen(otho, otho) and Scrimmage(otho, thedrick) and forall x (Cheapen(x, otho) and Scrimmage(otho, thedrick) -> Turtle(x, otho)) -> therefore Turtle(otho, otho)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The zerk harass the bennet. The zerk is limacine. The zerk is roofed. The zerk is touchable. The zerk is obligate. The zerk is blissful. The zerk bobble the bennet. The zerk process the bennet. The bennet harass the zerk. The bennet is limacine. The bennet is roofed. The bennet is touchable. The bennet is obligate. The bennet is blissful. The bennet bobble the zerk. The bennet process the zerk. If someone bobble the bennet and they visit the zerk then the zerk bobble the bennet. If someone bobble the zerk and the zerk is obligate then they see the bennet. If someone process the bennet and the bennet bobble the zerk then they eat the bennet. If someone is limacine and they eat the zerk then the zerk harass the bennet. If someone bobble the bennet then they visit the bennet. If someone is limacine then they see the bennet. If someone process the bennet and the bennet harass the zerk then they are limacine. If someone harass the zerk and the zerk harass the bennet then the bennet harass the zerk. The bennet does not eat the bennet.", "logic": "\nHarass(zerk, bennet)\nLimacine(zerk)\nRoofed(zerk)\nTouchable(zerk)\nObligate(zerk)\nBlissful(zerk)\nBobble(zerk, bennet)\nProcess(zerk, bennet)\nHarass(bennet, zerk)\nLimacine(bennet)\nRoofed(bennet)\nTouchable(bennet)\nObligate(bennet)\nBlissful(bennet)\nBobble(bennet, zerk)\nProcess(bennet, zerk)\nforall x (Bobble(x, bennet) and Process(x, zerk) -> Bobble(zerk, bennet))\nforall x (Bobble(x, zerk) and Obligate(zerk) -> Bobble(x, bennet))\nforall x (Process(x, bennet) and Bobble(bennet, zerk) -> Harass(x, bennet))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Harass(x, zerk) -> Harass(zerk, bennet))\nforall x (Bobble(x, bennet) -> Process(x, bennet))\nforall x (Limacine(x) -> Bobble(x, bennet))\nforall x (Process(x, bennet) and Harass(bennet, zerk) -> Limacine(x))\nforall x (Harass(x, zerk) and Harass(zerk, bennet) -> Harass(bennet, zerk))\n\nnot Harass(bennet, bennet)\n\nLimacine(bennet) and forall x (Limacine(x) -> Bobble(x, bennet)) -> therefore Bobble(bennet, bennet) Bobble(bennet, bennet) and forall x (Bobble(x, bennet) -> Process(x, bennet)) -> therefore Process(bennet, bennet) Process(bennet, bennet) and Bobble(bennet, zerk) and forall x (Process(x, bennet) and Bobble(bennet, zerk) -> Harass(x, bennet)) -> therefore Harass(bennet, bennet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The jeremie take the aurlie. The jeremie is instant. The jeremie is cragged. The jeremie is toneless. The jeremie is stentorian. The jeremie is monetary. The jeremie islamize the aurlie. The jeremie ostentate the aurlie. The aurlie take the jeremie. The aurlie is instant. The aurlie is cragged. The aurlie is toneless. The aurlie is stentorian. The aurlie is monetary. The aurlie islamize the jeremie. The aurlie ostentate the jeremie. If someone islamize the aurlie and they visit the jeremie then the jeremie islamize the aurlie. If someone islamize the jeremie and the jeremie is stentorian then they see the aurlie. If someone ostentate the aurlie and the aurlie islamize the jeremie then they eat the aurlie. If someone is instant and they eat the jeremie then the jeremie take the aurlie. If someone islamize the aurlie then they visit the aurlie. If someone is instant then they see the aurlie. If someone ostentate the aurlie and the aurlie take the jeremie then they are instant. If someone take the jeremie and the jeremie take the aurlie then the aurlie take the jeremie. The jeremie does not eat the jeremie.", "logic": "\nTake(jeremie, aurlie)\nInstant(jeremie)\nCragged(jeremie)\nToneless(jeremie)\nStentorian(jeremie)\nMonetary(jeremie)\nIslamize(jeremie, aurlie)\nOstentate(jeremie, aurlie)\nTake(aurlie, jeremie)\nInstant(aurlie)\nCragged(aurlie)\nToneless(aurlie)\nStentorian(aurlie)\nMonetary(aurlie)\nIslamize(aurlie, jeremie)\nOstentate(aurlie, jeremie)\nforall x (Islamize(x, aurlie) and Ostentate(x, jeremie) -> Islamize(jeremie, aurlie))\nforall x (Islamize(x, jeremie) and Stentorian(jeremie) -> Islamize(x, aurlie))\nforall x (Ostentate(x, aurlie) and Islamize(aurlie, jeremie) -> Take(x, aurlie))\nforall x (Instant(x) and Take(x, jeremie) -> Take(jeremie, aurlie))\nforall x (Islamize(x, aurlie) -> Ostentate(x, aurlie))\nforall x (Instant(x) -> Islamize(x, aurlie))\nforall x (Ostentate(x, aurlie) and Take(aurlie, jeremie) -> Instant(x))\nforall x (Take(x, jeremie) and Take(jeremie, aurlie) -> Take(aurlie, jeremie))\n\nnot Take(jeremie, jeremie)\n\nnot Take(jeremie, jeremie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The rolf ballast the cathee. The rolf is bibbed. The rolf is textured. The rolf is unrecorded. The rolf is scarce. The rolf is caitiff. The rolf deaf the cathee. The rolf handstamp the cathee. The cathee ballast the rolf. The cathee is bibbed. The cathee is textured. The cathee is unrecorded. The cathee is scarce. The cathee is caitiff. The cathee deaf the rolf. The cathee handstamp the rolf. If someone deaf the cathee and they visit the rolf then the rolf deaf the cathee. If someone deaf the rolf and the rolf is scarce then they see the cathee. If someone handstamp the cathee and the cathee deaf the rolf then they eat the cathee. If someone is bibbed and they eat the rolf then the rolf ballast the cathee. If someone deaf the cathee then they visit the cathee. If someone is bibbed then they see the cathee. If someone handstamp the cathee and the cathee ballast the rolf then they are bibbed. If someone ballast the rolf and the rolf ballast the cathee then the cathee ballast the rolf. The rolf handstamp the rolf.", "logic": "\nBallast(rolf, cathee)\nBibbed(rolf)\nTextured(rolf)\nUnrecorded(rolf)\nScarce(rolf)\nCaitiff(rolf)\nDeaf(rolf, cathee)\nHandstamp(rolf, cathee)\nBallast(cathee, rolf)\nBibbed(cathee)\nTextured(cathee)\nUnrecorded(cathee)\nScarce(cathee)\nCaitiff(cathee)\nDeaf(cathee, rolf)\nHandstamp(cathee, rolf)\nforall x (Deaf(x, cathee) and Handstamp(x, rolf) -> Deaf(rolf, cathee))\nforall x (Deaf(x, rolf) and Scarce(rolf) -> Deaf(x, cathee))\nforall x (Handstamp(x, cathee) and Deaf(cathee, rolf) -> Ballast(x, cathee))\nforall x (Bibbed(x) and Ballast(x, rolf) -> Ballast(rolf, cathee))\nforall x (Deaf(x, cathee) -> Handstamp(x, cathee))\nforall x (Bibbed(x) -> Deaf(x, cathee))\nforall x (Handstamp(x, cathee) and Ballast(cathee, rolf) -> Bibbed(x))\nforall x (Ballast(x, rolf) and Ballast(rolf, cathee) -> Ballast(cathee, rolf))\n\nHandstamp(rolf, rolf)\n\nHandstamp(rolf, rolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The llewellyn is foiled. The hedi trust the malissa. The hedi realign the llewellyn. The hedi realign the malissa. The hedi is foiled. The hedi decease the llewellyn. The alexander is reliant. The malissa trust the hedi. The malissa is masculine. The malissa is foiled. If someone realign the hedi and the hedi realign the llewellyn then the llewellyn decease the alexander. If someone trust the malissa then the malissa realign the alexander. If someone realign the alexander then they eat the hedi. If someone realign the hedi then the hedi realign the alexander. If someone is wifelike then they see the hedi. If the llewellyn is foiled and the llewellyn realign the alexander then the llewellyn decease the hedi. The malissa is foiled.", "logic": "\nFoiled(llewellyn)\nTrust(hedi, malissa)\nRealign(hedi, llewellyn)\nRealign(hedi, malissa)\nFoiled(hedi)\nDecease(hedi, llewellyn)\nReliant(alexander)\nTrust(malissa, hedi)\nMasculine(malissa)\nFoiled(malissa)\nforall x (Realign(x, hedi) and Realign(hedi, llewellyn) -> Decease(llewellyn, alexander))\nforall x (Trust(x, malissa) -> Realign(malissa, alexander))\nforall x (Realign(x, alexander) -> Realign(x, hedi))\nforall x (Realign(x, hedi) -> Realign(hedi, alexander))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Decease(x, hedi))\nFoiled(llewellyn) and Realign(llewellyn, alexander) -> Decease(llewellyn, hedi)\n\nFoiled(malissa)\n\ntherefore Foiled(malissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The minda is appeasable. The katrina machinate the holley. The katrina okay the minda. The katrina okay the holley. The katrina is appeasable. The katrina clamor the minda. The bren is serbian. The holley machinate the katrina. The holley is unfit. The holley is appeasable. If someone okay the katrina and the katrina okay the minda then the minda clamor the bren. If someone machinate the holley then the holley okay the bren. If someone okay the bren then they eat the katrina. If someone okay the katrina then the katrina okay the bren. If someone is subaqueous then they see the katrina. If the minda is appeasable and the minda okay the bren then the minda clamor the katrina. The katrina does not eat the holley.", "logic": "\nAppeasable(minda)\nMachinate(katrina, holley)\nOkay(katrina, minda)\nOkay(katrina, holley)\nAppeasable(katrina)\nClamor(katrina, minda)\nSerbian(bren)\nMachinate(holley, katrina)\nUnfit(holley)\nAppeasable(holley)\nforall x (Okay(x, katrina) and Okay(katrina, minda) -> Clamor(minda, bren))\nforall x (Machinate(x, holley) -> Okay(holley, bren))\nforall x (Okay(x, bren) -> Okay(x, katrina))\nforall x (Okay(x, katrina) -> Okay(katrina, bren))\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) -> Clamor(x, katrina))\nAppeasable(minda) and Okay(minda, bren) -> Clamor(minda, katrina)\n\nnot Okay(katrina, holley)\n\ntherefore Okay(katrina, holley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The dorolisa is puffy. The philippe redact the brittany. The philippe sugar the dorolisa. The philippe sugar the brittany. The philippe is puffy. The philippe wish the dorolisa. The gwenora is unmanly. The brittany redact the philippe. The brittany is holistic. The brittany is puffy. If someone sugar the philippe and the philippe sugar the dorolisa then the dorolisa wish the gwenora. If someone redact the brittany then the brittany sugar the gwenora. If someone sugar the gwenora then they eat the philippe. If someone sugar the philippe then the philippe sugar the gwenora. If someone is meet then they see the philippe. If the dorolisa is puffy and the dorolisa sugar the gwenora then the dorolisa wish the philippe. The brittany sugar the gwenora.", "logic": "\nPuffy(dorolisa)\nRedact(philippe, brittany)\nSugar(philippe, dorolisa)\nSugar(philippe, brittany)\nPuffy(philippe)\nWish(philippe, dorolisa)\nUnmanly(gwenora)\nRedact(brittany, philippe)\nHolistic(brittany)\nPuffy(brittany)\nforall x (Sugar(x, philippe) and Sugar(philippe, dorolisa) -> Wish(dorolisa, gwenora))\nforall x (Redact(x, brittany) -> Sugar(brittany, gwenora))\nforall x (Sugar(x, gwenora) -> Sugar(x, philippe))\nforall x (Sugar(x, philippe) -> Sugar(philippe, gwenora))\nforall x (Meet(x) -> Wish(x, philippe))\nPuffy(dorolisa) and Sugar(dorolisa, gwenora) -> Wish(dorolisa, philippe)\n\nSugar(brittany, gwenora)\n\nRedact(philippe, brittany) and forall x (Redact(x, brittany) -> Sugar(brittany, gwenora)) -> therefore Sugar(brittany, gwenora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The loella is anticlinal. The marys retool the marlin. The marys speck the loella. The marys speck the marlin. The marys is anticlinal. The marys subsidize the loella. The micaela is priestly. The marlin retool the marys. The marlin is probing. The marlin is anticlinal. If someone speck the marys and the marys speck the loella then the loella subsidize the micaela. If someone retool the marlin then the marlin speck the micaela. If someone speck the micaela then they eat the marys. If someone speck the marys then the marys speck the micaela. If someone is thoughtful then they see the marys. If the loella is anticlinal and the loella speck the micaela then the loella subsidize the marys. The marlin does not eat the micaela.", "logic": "\nAnticlinal(loella)\nRetool(marys, marlin)\nSpeck(marys, loella)\nSpeck(marys, marlin)\nAnticlinal(marys)\nSubsidize(marys, loella)\nPriestly(micaela)\nRetool(marlin, marys)\nProbing(marlin)\nAnticlinal(marlin)\nforall x (Speck(x, marys) and Speck(marys, loella) -> Subsidize(loella, micaela))\nforall x (Retool(x, marlin) -> Speck(marlin, micaela))\nforall x (Speck(x, micaela) -> Speck(x, marys))\nforall x (Speck(x, marys) -> Speck(marys, micaela))\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) -> Subsidize(x, marys))\nAnticlinal(loella) and Speck(loella, micaela) -> Subsidize(loella, marys)\n\nnot Speck(marlin, micaela)\n\nRetool(marys, marlin) and forall x (Retool(x, marlin) -> Speck(marlin, micaela)) -> therefore Speck(marlin, micaela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The godiva is best. The raye posture the mariska. The raye absent the godiva. The raye absent the mariska. The raye is best. The raye suds the godiva. The kathryne is psychic. The mariska posture the raye. The mariska is sundry. The mariska is best. If someone absent the raye and the raye absent the godiva then the godiva suds the kathryne. If someone posture the mariska then the mariska absent the kathryne. If someone absent the kathryne then they eat the raye. If someone absent the raye then the raye absent the kathryne. If someone is unsure then they see the raye. If the godiva is best and the godiva absent the kathryne then the godiva suds the raye. The mariska absent the raye.", "logic": "\nBest(godiva)\nPosture(raye, mariska)\nAbsent(raye, godiva)\nAbsent(raye, mariska)\nBest(raye)\nSuds(raye, godiva)\nPsychic(kathryne)\nPosture(mariska, raye)\nSundry(mariska)\nBest(mariska)\nforall x (Absent(x, raye) and Absent(raye, godiva) -> Suds(godiva, kathryne))\nforall x (Posture(x, mariska) -> Absent(mariska, kathryne))\nforall x (Absent(x, kathryne) -> Absent(x, raye))\nforall x (Absent(x, raye) -> Absent(raye, kathryne))\nforall x (Unsure(x) -> Suds(x, raye))\nBest(godiva) and Absent(godiva, kathryne) -> Suds(godiva, raye)\n\nAbsent(mariska, raye)\n\nPosture(raye, mariska) and forall x (Posture(x, mariska) -> Absent(mariska, kathryne)) -> therefore Absent(mariska, kathryne) Absent(mariska, kathryne) and forall x (Absent(x, kathryne) -> Absent(x, raye)) -> therefore Absent(mariska, raye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The osmond is vulpecular. The emlynne elongate the gardiner. The emlynne outgeneral the osmond. The emlynne outgeneral the gardiner. The emlynne is vulpecular. The emlynne rectify the osmond. The rosemaria is futuristic. The gardiner elongate the emlynne. The gardiner is visaged. The gardiner is vulpecular. If someone outgeneral the emlynne and the emlynne outgeneral the osmond then the osmond rectify the rosemaria. If someone elongate the gardiner then the gardiner outgeneral the rosemaria. If someone outgeneral the rosemaria then they eat the emlynne. If someone outgeneral the emlynne then the emlynne outgeneral the rosemaria. If someone is pressor then they see the emlynne. If the osmond is vulpecular and the osmond outgeneral the rosemaria then the osmond rectify the emlynne. The gardiner does not eat the emlynne.", "logic": "\nVulpecular(osmond)\nElongate(emlynne, gardiner)\nOutgeneral(emlynne, osmond)\nOutgeneral(emlynne, gardiner)\nVulpecular(emlynne)\nRectify(emlynne, osmond)\nFuturistic(rosemaria)\nElongate(gardiner, emlynne)\nVisaged(gardiner)\nVulpecular(gardiner)\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, emlynne) and Outgeneral(emlynne, osmond) -> Rectify(osmond, rosemaria))\nforall x (Elongate(x, gardiner) -> Outgeneral(gardiner, rosemaria))\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, rosemaria) -> Outgeneral(x, emlynne))\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, emlynne) -> Outgeneral(emlynne, rosemaria))\nforall x (Pressor(x) -> Rectify(x, emlynne))\nVulpecular(osmond) and Outgeneral(osmond, rosemaria) -> Rectify(osmond, emlynne)\n\nnot Outgeneral(gardiner, emlynne)\n\nElongate(emlynne, gardiner) and forall x (Elongate(x, gardiner) -> Outgeneral(gardiner, rosemaria)) -> therefore Outgeneral(gardiner, rosemaria) Outgeneral(gardiner, rosemaria) and forall x (Outgeneral(x, rosemaria) -> Outgeneral(x, emlynne)) -> therefore Outgeneral(gardiner, emlynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The karita is marine. The marlena devil the sonia. The marlena rouse the karita. The marlena rouse the sonia. The marlena is marine. The marlena baronetise the karita. The leighton is grumous. The sonia devil the marlena. The sonia is expedient. The sonia is marine. If someone rouse the marlena and the marlena rouse the karita then the karita baronetise the leighton. If someone devil the sonia then the sonia rouse the leighton. If someone rouse the leighton then they eat the marlena. If someone rouse the marlena then the marlena rouse the leighton. If someone is amnesic then they see the marlena. If the karita is marine and the karita rouse the leighton then the karita baronetise the marlena. The marlena rouse the leighton.", "logic": "\nMarine(karita)\nDevil(marlena, sonia)\nRouse(marlena, karita)\nRouse(marlena, sonia)\nMarine(marlena)\nBaronetise(marlena, karita)\nGrumous(leighton)\nDevil(sonia, marlena)\nExpedient(sonia)\nMarine(sonia)\nforall x (Rouse(x, marlena) and Rouse(marlena, karita) -> Baronetise(karita, leighton))\nforall x (Devil(x, sonia) -> Rouse(sonia, leighton))\nforall x (Rouse(x, leighton) -> Rouse(x, marlena))\nforall x (Rouse(x, marlena) -> Rouse(marlena, leighton))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Baronetise(x, marlena))\nMarine(karita) and Rouse(karita, leighton) -> Baronetise(karita, marlena)\n\nRouse(marlena, leighton)\n\nDevil(marlena, sonia) and forall x (Devil(x, sonia) -> Rouse(sonia, leighton)) -> therefore Rouse(sonia, leighton) Rouse(sonia, leighton) and forall x (Rouse(x, leighton) -> Rouse(x, marlena)) -> therefore Rouse(sonia, marlena) Rouse(sonia, marlena) and forall x (Rouse(x, marlena) -> Rouse(marlena, leighton)) -> therefore Rouse(marlena, leighton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The catherina is active. The tremain spiel the dominick. The tremain impound the catherina. The tremain impound the dominick. The tremain is active. The tremain screw the catherina. The lavinie is emphasized. The dominick spiel the tremain. The dominick is feisty. The dominick is active. If someone impound the tremain and the tremain impound the catherina then the catherina screw the lavinie. If someone spiel the dominick then the dominick impound the lavinie. If someone impound the lavinie then they eat the tremain. If someone impound the tremain then the tremain impound the lavinie. If someone is educated then they see the tremain. If the catherina is active and the catherina impound the lavinie then the catherina screw the tremain. The tremain does not eat the lavinie.", "logic": "\nActive(catherina)\nSpiel(tremain, dominick)\nImpound(tremain, catherina)\nImpound(tremain, dominick)\nActive(tremain)\nScrew(tremain, catherina)\nEmphasized(lavinie)\nSpiel(dominick, tremain)\nFeisty(dominick)\nActive(dominick)\nforall x (Impound(x, tremain) and Impound(tremain, catherina) -> Screw(catherina, lavinie))\nforall x (Spiel(x, dominick) -> Impound(dominick, lavinie))\nforall x (Impound(x, lavinie) -> Impound(x, tremain))\nforall x (Impound(x, tremain) -> Impound(tremain, lavinie))\nforall x (Educated(x) -> Screw(x, tremain))\nActive(catherina) and Impound(catherina, lavinie) -> Screw(catherina, tremain)\n\nnot Impound(tremain, lavinie)\n\nSpiel(tremain, dominick) and forall x (Spiel(x, dominick) -> Impound(dominick, lavinie)) -> therefore Impound(dominick, lavinie) Impound(dominick, lavinie) and forall x (Impound(x, lavinie) -> Impound(x, tremain)) -> therefore Impound(dominick, tremain) Impound(dominick, tremain) and forall x (Impound(x, tremain) -> Impound(tremain, lavinie)) -> therefore Impound(tremain, lavinie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The estella is continued. The sadie handicap the caesar. The sadie pillow the estella. The sadie pillow the caesar. The sadie is continued. The sadie oppress the estella. The ivor is handy. The caesar handicap the sadie. The caesar is eldest. The caesar is continued. If someone pillow the sadie and the sadie pillow the estella then the estella oppress the ivor. If someone handicap the caesar then the caesar pillow the ivor. If someone pillow the ivor then they eat the sadie. If someone pillow the sadie then the sadie pillow the ivor. If someone is laborious then they see the sadie. If the estella is continued and the estella pillow the ivor then the estella oppress the sadie. The ivor does not see the sadie.", "logic": "\nContinued(estella)\nHandicap(sadie, caesar)\nPillow(sadie, estella)\nPillow(sadie, caesar)\nContinued(sadie)\nOppress(sadie, estella)\nHandy(ivor)\nHandicap(caesar, sadie)\nEldest(caesar)\nContinued(caesar)\nforall x (Pillow(x, sadie) and Pillow(sadie, estella) -> Oppress(estella, ivor))\nforall x (Handicap(x, caesar) -> Pillow(caesar, ivor))\nforall x (Pillow(x, ivor) -> Pillow(x, sadie))\nforall x (Pillow(x, sadie) -> Pillow(sadie, ivor))\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Oppress(x, sadie))\nContinued(estella) and Pillow(estella, ivor) -> Oppress(estella, sadie)\n\nnot Oppress(ivor, sadie)\n\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Oppress(x, sadie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The dietrich is ionian. The collette erase the shawn. The collette waddle the dietrich. The collette waddle the shawn. The collette is ionian. The collette alienate the dietrich. The lois is mexican. The shawn erase the collette. The shawn is spongelike. The shawn is ionian. If someone waddle the collette and the collette waddle the dietrich then the dietrich alienate the lois. If someone erase the shawn then the shawn waddle the lois. If someone waddle the lois then they eat the collette. If someone waddle the collette then the collette waddle the lois. If someone is witless then they see the collette. If the dietrich is ionian and the dietrich waddle the lois then the dietrich alienate the collette. The lois waddle the collette.", "logic": "\nIonian(dietrich)\nErase(collette, shawn)\nWaddle(collette, dietrich)\nWaddle(collette, shawn)\nIonian(collette)\nAlienate(collette, dietrich)\nMexican(lois)\nErase(shawn, collette)\nSpongelike(shawn)\nIonian(shawn)\nforall x (Waddle(x, collette) and Waddle(collette, dietrich) -> Alienate(dietrich, lois))\nforall x (Erase(x, shawn) -> Waddle(shawn, lois))\nforall x (Waddle(x, lois) -> Waddle(x, collette))\nforall x (Waddle(x, collette) -> Waddle(collette, lois))\nforall x (Witless(x) -> Alienate(x, collette))\nIonian(dietrich) and Waddle(dietrich, lois) -> Alienate(dietrich, collette)\n\nWaddle(lois, collette)\n\nforall x (Waddle(x, lois) -> Waddle(x, collette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The zed is epigastric. The benetta sprain the carolyn. The benetta rectify the zed. The benetta rectify the carolyn. The benetta is epigastric. The benetta submerge the zed. The samuela is polyphonic. The carolyn sprain the benetta. The carolyn is convulsive. The carolyn is epigastric. If someone rectify the benetta and the benetta rectify the zed then the zed submerge the samuela. If someone sprain the carolyn then the carolyn rectify the samuela. If someone rectify the samuela then they eat the benetta. If someone rectify the benetta then the benetta rectify the samuela. If someone is nonviolent then they see the benetta. If the zed is epigastric and the zed rectify the samuela then the zed submerge the benetta. The benetta does not see the benetta.", "logic": "\nEpigastric(zed)\nSprain(benetta, carolyn)\nRectify(benetta, zed)\nRectify(benetta, carolyn)\nEpigastric(benetta)\nSubmerge(benetta, zed)\nPolyphonic(samuela)\nSprain(carolyn, benetta)\nConvulsive(carolyn)\nEpigastric(carolyn)\nforall x (Rectify(x, benetta) and Rectify(benetta, zed) -> Submerge(zed, samuela))\nforall x (Sprain(x, carolyn) -> Rectify(carolyn, samuela))\nforall x (Rectify(x, samuela) -> Rectify(x, benetta))\nforall x (Rectify(x, benetta) -> Rectify(benetta, samuela))\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) -> Submerge(x, benetta))\nEpigastric(zed) and Rectify(zed, samuela) -> Submerge(zed, benetta)\n\nnot Submerge(benetta, benetta)\n\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) -> Submerge(x, benetta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The gwenette is grimy. The clarinda benefact the karalynn. The clarinda sweeten the gwenette. The clarinda sweeten the karalynn. The clarinda is grimy. The clarinda rally the gwenette. The orelee is squat. The karalynn benefact the clarinda. The karalynn is processed. The karalynn is grimy. If someone sweeten the clarinda and the clarinda sweeten the gwenette then the gwenette rally the orelee. If someone benefact the karalynn then the karalynn sweeten the orelee. If someone sweeten the orelee then they eat the clarinda. If someone sweeten the clarinda then the clarinda sweeten the orelee. If someone is xxix then they see the clarinda. If the gwenette is grimy and the gwenette sweeten the orelee then the gwenette rally the clarinda. The karalynn rally the clarinda.", "logic": "\nGrimy(gwenette)\nBenefact(clarinda, karalynn)\nSweeten(clarinda, gwenette)\nSweeten(clarinda, karalynn)\nGrimy(clarinda)\nRally(clarinda, gwenette)\nSquat(orelee)\nBenefact(karalynn, clarinda)\nProcessed(karalynn)\nGrimy(karalynn)\nforall x (Sweeten(x, clarinda) and Sweeten(clarinda, gwenette) -> Rally(gwenette, orelee))\nforall x (Benefact(x, karalynn) -> Sweeten(karalynn, orelee))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, orelee) -> Sweeten(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, clarinda) -> Sweeten(clarinda, orelee))\nforall x (Xxix(x) -> Rally(x, clarinda))\nGrimy(gwenette) and Sweeten(gwenette, orelee) -> Rally(gwenette, clarinda)\n\nRally(karalynn, clarinda)\n\nforall x (Xxix(x) -> Rally(x, clarinda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The charo is sought. The marcile squelch the lindsay. The marcile harp the charo. The marcile harp the lindsay. The marcile is sought. The marcile vivify the charo. The dyna is oleaginous. The lindsay squelch the marcile. The lindsay is homologic. The lindsay is sought. If someone harp the marcile and the marcile harp the charo then the charo vivify the dyna. If someone squelch the lindsay then the lindsay harp the dyna. If someone harp the dyna then they eat the marcile. If someone harp the marcile then the marcile harp the dyna. If someone is youngish then they see the marcile. If the charo is sought and the charo harp the dyna then the charo vivify the marcile. The charo is not oleaginous.", "logic": "\nSought(charo)\nSquelch(marcile, lindsay)\nHarp(marcile, charo)\nHarp(marcile, lindsay)\nSought(marcile)\nVivify(marcile, charo)\nOleaginous(dyna)\nSquelch(lindsay, marcile)\nHomologic(lindsay)\nSought(lindsay)\nforall x (Harp(x, marcile) and Harp(marcile, charo) -> Vivify(charo, dyna))\nforall x (Squelch(x, lindsay) -> Harp(lindsay, dyna))\nforall x (Harp(x, dyna) -> Harp(x, marcile))\nforall x (Harp(x, marcile) -> Harp(marcile, dyna))\nforall x (Youngish(x) -> Vivify(x, marcile))\nSought(charo) and Harp(charo, dyna) -> Vivify(charo, marcile)\n\nnot Oleaginous(charo)\n\nnot Oleaginous(charo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The jordain is largo. The aubert confection the nilson. The aubert hatchel the jordain. The aubert hatchel the nilson. The aubert is largo. The aubert shill the jordain. The mick is hiemal. The nilson confection the aubert. The nilson is nebular. The nilson is largo. If someone hatchel the aubert and the aubert hatchel the jordain then the jordain shill the mick. If someone confection the nilson then the nilson hatchel the mick. If someone hatchel the mick then they eat the aubert. If someone hatchel the aubert then the aubert hatchel the mick. If someone is ministrant then they see the aubert. If the jordain is largo and the jordain hatchel the mick then the jordain shill the aubert. The mick is nebular.", "logic": "\nLargo(jordain)\nConfection(aubert, nilson)\nHatchel(aubert, jordain)\nHatchel(aubert, nilson)\nLargo(aubert)\nShill(aubert, jordain)\nHiemal(mick)\nConfection(nilson, aubert)\nNebular(nilson)\nLargo(nilson)\nforall x (Hatchel(x, aubert) and Hatchel(aubert, jordain) -> Shill(jordain, mick))\nforall x (Confection(x, nilson) -> Hatchel(nilson, mick))\nforall x (Hatchel(x, mick) -> Hatchel(x, aubert))\nforall x (Hatchel(x, aubert) -> Hatchel(aubert, mick))\nforall x (Ministrant(x) -> Shill(x, aubert))\nLargo(jordain) and Hatchel(jordain, mick) -> Shill(jordain, aubert)\n\nNebular(mick)\n\nNebular(mick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The merralee is gambian. The madelina aphorise the ambrosius. The madelina heal the merralee. The madelina heal the ambrosius. The madelina is gambian. The madelina welter the merralee. The valaria is bibless. The ambrosius aphorise the madelina. The ambrosius is sulfuric. The ambrosius is gambian. If someone heal the madelina and the madelina heal the merralee then the merralee welter the valaria. If someone aphorise the ambrosius then the ambrosius heal the valaria. If someone heal the valaria then they eat the madelina. If someone heal the madelina then the madelina heal the valaria. If someone is uptight then they see the madelina. If the merralee is gambian and the merralee heal the valaria then the merralee welter the madelina. The madelina does not chase the madelina.", "logic": "\nGambian(merralee)\nAphorise(madelina, ambrosius)\nHeal(madelina, merralee)\nHeal(madelina, ambrosius)\nGambian(madelina)\nWelter(madelina, merralee)\nBibless(valaria)\nAphorise(ambrosius, madelina)\nSulfuric(ambrosius)\nGambian(ambrosius)\nforall x (Heal(x, madelina) and Heal(madelina, merralee) -> Welter(merralee, valaria))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, ambrosius) -> Heal(ambrosius, valaria))\nforall x (Heal(x, valaria) -> Heal(x, madelina))\nforall x (Heal(x, madelina) -> Heal(madelina, valaria))\nforall x (Uptight(x) -> Welter(x, madelina))\nGambian(merralee) and Heal(merralee, valaria) -> Welter(merralee, madelina)\n\nnot Aphorise(madelina, madelina)\n\nnot Aphorise(madelina, madelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The monte is ilxxx. The kaia spud the brandie. The kaia police the monte. The kaia police the brandie. The kaia is ilxxx. The kaia middle the monte. The xylia is maudlin. The brandie spud the kaia. The brandie is umteenth. The brandie is ilxxx. If someone police the kaia and the kaia police the monte then the monte middle the xylia. If someone spud the brandie then the brandie police the xylia. If someone police the xylia then they eat the kaia. If someone police the kaia then the kaia police the xylia. If someone is dotty then they see the kaia. If the monte is ilxxx and the monte police the xylia then the monte middle the kaia. The monte spud the brandie.", "logic": "\nIlxxx(monte)\nSpud(kaia, brandie)\nPolice(kaia, monte)\nPolice(kaia, brandie)\nIlxxx(kaia)\nMiddle(kaia, monte)\nMaudlin(xylia)\nSpud(brandie, kaia)\nUmteenth(brandie)\nIlxxx(brandie)\nforall x (Police(x, kaia) and Police(kaia, monte) -> Middle(monte, xylia))\nforall x (Spud(x, brandie) -> Police(brandie, xylia))\nforall x (Police(x, xylia) -> Police(x, kaia))\nforall x (Police(x, kaia) -> Police(kaia, xylia))\nforall x (Dotty(x) -> Middle(x, kaia))\nIlxxx(monte) and Police(monte, xylia) -> Middle(monte, kaia)\n\nSpud(monte, brandie)\n\nSpud(monte, brandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The yoshi does not chase the ismail. The clarisse does not chase the yoshi. The clarisse overwinter the ismail. The clarisse is telescoped. The clarisse is lustful. The clarisse is not comfy. The clarisse count the yoshi. The clarisse does not need the ismail. The ismail overwinter the clarisse. The ismail pitchfork the yoshi. The ismail is not telescoped. The ismail count the clarisse. If something overwinter the ismail and it count the clarisse then the ismail count the yoshi. If something pitchfork the yoshi and it is not telescoped then it count the ismail. If something is lustful then it count the clarisse. If something count the yoshi and it count the clarisse then it does not eat the clarisse. If something overwinter the clarisse and it is not comfy then the clarisse does not need the yoshi. If the yoshi is eightieth and the yoshi does not need the clarisse then the clarisse count the yoshi. The ismail pitchfork the yoshi.", "logic": "\nnot Overwinter(yoshi, ismail)\nnot Overwinter(clarisse, yoshi)\nOverwinter(clarisse, ismail)\nTelescoped(clarisse)\nLustful(clarisse)\nnot Comfy(clarisse)\nCount(clarisse, yoshi)\nnot Count(clarisse, ismail)\nOverwinter(ismail, clarisse)\nPitchfork(ismail, yoshi)\nnot Telescoped(ismail)\nCount(ismail, clarisse)\nforall x (Overwinter(x, ismail) and Count(x, clarisse) -> Count(ismail, yoshi))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, yoshi) and not Telescoped(x) -> Count(x, ismail))\nforall x (Lustful(x) -> Count(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Count(x, yoshi) and Count(x, clarisse) -> not Pitchfork(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Overwinter(x, clarisse) and not Comfy(x) -> not Count(clarisse, yoshi))\nEightieth(yoshi) and not Count(yoshi, clarisse) -> Count(clarisse, yoshi)\n\nPitchfork(ismail, yoshi)\n\ntherefore Pitchfork(ismail, yoshi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The emelyne does not chase the suzetta. The nevins does not chase the emelyne. The nevins locomote the suzetta. The nevins is diametral. The nevins is bias. The nevins is not anoestrous. The nevins concertise the emelyne. The nevins does not need the suzetta. The suzetta locomote the nevins. The suzetta unburden the emelyne. The suzetta is not diametral. The suzetta concertise the nevins. If something locomote the suzetta and it concertise the nevins then the suzetta concertise the emelyne. If something unburden the emelyne and it is not diametral then it concertise the suzetta. If something is bias then it concertise the nevins. If something concertise the emelyne and it concertise the nevins then it does not eat the nevins. If something locomote the nevins and it is not anoestrous then the nevins does not need the emelyne. If the emelyne is sissyish and the emelyne does not need the nevins then the nevins concertise the emelyne. The suzetta does not need the nevins.", "logic": "\nnot Locomote(emelyne, suzetta)\nnot Locomote(nevins, emelyne)\nLocomote(nevins, suzetta)\nDiametral(nevins)\nBias(nevins)\nnot Anoestrous(nevins)\nConcertise(nevins, emelyne)\nnot Concertise(nevins, suzetta)\nLocomote(suzetta, nevins)\nUnburden(suzetta, emelyne)\nnot Diametral(suzetta)\nConcertise(suzetta, nevins)\nforall x (Locomote(x, suzetta) and Concertise(x, nevins) -> Concertise(suzetta, emelyne))\nforall x (Unburden(x, emelyne) and not Diametral(x) -> Concertise(x, suzetta))\nforall x (Bias(x) -> Concertise(x, nevins))\nforall x (Concertise(x, emelyne) and Concertise(x, nevins) -> not Unburden(x, nevins))\nforall x (Locomote(x, nevins) and not Anoestrous(x) -> not Concertise(nevins, emelyne))\nSissyish(emelyne) and not Concertise(emelyne, nevins) -> Concertise(nevins, emelyne)\n\nnot Concertise(suzetta, nevins)\n\ntherefore Concertise(suzetta, nevins)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The fernanda does not chase the amadeus. The francis does not chase the fernanda. The francis nucleate the amadeus. The francis is actinoid. The francis is confirmed. The francis is not venetian. The francis herald the fernanda. The francis does not need the amadeus. The amadeus nucleate the francis. The amadeus quake the fernanda. The amadeus is not actinoid. The amadeus herald the francis. If something nucleate the amadeus and it herald the francis then the amadeus herald the fernanda. If something quake the fernanda and it is not actinoid then it herald the amadeus. If something is confirmed then it herald the francis. If something herald the fernanda and it herald the francis then it does not eat the francis. If something nucleate the francis and it is not venetian then the francis does not need the fernanda. If the fernanda is booted and the fernanda does not need the francis then the francis herald the fernanda. The amadeus herald the amadeus.", "logic": "\nnot Nucleate(fernanda, amadeus)\nnot Nucleate(francis, fernanda)\nNucleate(francis, amadeus)\nActinoid(francis)\nConfirmed(francis)\nnot Venetian(francis)\nHerald(francis, fernanda)\nnot Herald(francis, amadeus)\nNucleate(amadeus, francis)\nQuake(amadeus, fernanda)\nnot Actinoid(amadeus)\nHerald(amadeus, francis)\nforall x (Nucleate(x, amadeus) and Herald(x, francis) -> Herald(amadeus, fernanda))\nforall x (Quake(x, fernanda) and not Actinoid(x) -> Herald(x, amadeus))\nforall x (Confirmed(x) -> Herald(x, francis))\nforall x (Herald(x, fernanda) and Herald(x, francis) -> not Quake(x, francis))\nforall x (Nucleate(x, francis) and not Venetian(x) -> not Herald(francis, fernanda))\nBooted(fernanda) and not Herald(fernanda, francis) -> Herald(francis, fernanda)\n\nHerald(amadeus, amadeus)\n\nQuake(amadeus, fernanda) and not Actinoid(amadeus) and forall x (Quake(x, fernanda) and not Actinoid(x) -> Herald(x, amadeus)) -> therefore Herald(amadeus, amadeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The trisha does not chase the aleen. The agace does not chase the trisha. The agace linearise the aleen. The agace is unable. The agace is arsenical. The agace is not rushy. The agace bedeck the trisha. The agace does not need the aleen. The aleen linearise the agace. The aleen obturate the trisha. The aleen is not unable. The aleen bedeck the agace. If something linearise the aleen and it bedeck the agace then the aleen bedeck the trisha. If something obturate the trisha and it is not unable then it bedeck the aleen. If something is arsenical then it bedeck the agace. If something bedeck the trisha and it bedeck the agace then it does not eat the agace. If something linearise the agace and it is not rushy then the agace does not need the trisha. If the trisha is cavitied and the trisha does not need the agace then the agace bedeck the trisha. The aleen does not need the aleen.", "logic": "\nnot Linearise(trisha, aleen)\nnot Linearise(agace, trisha)\nLinearise(agace, aleen)\nUnable(agace)\nArsenical(agace)\nnot Rushy(agace)\nBedeck(agace, trisha)\nnot Bedeck(agace, aleen)\nLinearise(aleen, agace)\nObturate(aleen, trisha)\nnot Unable(aleen)\nBedeck(aleen, agace)\nforall x (Linearise(x, aleen) and Bedeck(x, agace) -> Bedeck(aleen, trisha))\nforall x (Obturate(x, trisha) and not Unable(x) -> Bedeck(x, aleen))\nforall x (Arsenical(x) -> Bedeck(x, agace))\nforall x (Bedeck(x, trisha) and Bedeck(x, agace) -> not Obturate(x, agace))\nforall x (Linearise(x, agace) and not Rushy(x) -> not Bedeck(agace, trisha))\nCavitied(trisha) and not Bedeck(trisha, agace) -> Bedeck(agace, trisha)\n\nnot Bedeck(aleen, aleen)\n\nObturate(aleen, trisha) and not Unable(aleen) and forall x (Obturate(x, trisha) and not Unable(x) -> Bedeck(x, aleen)) -> therefore Bedeck(aleen, aleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The eugenia does not chase the natka. The patsy does not chase the eugenia. The patsy reap the natka. The patsy is fetching. The patsy is bantering. The patsy is not annalistic. The patsy vomit the eugenia. The patsy does not need the natka. The natka reap the patsy. The natka dedicate the eugenia. The natka is not fetching. The natka vomit the patsy. If something reap the natka and it vomit the patsy then the natka vomit the eugenia. If something dedicate the eugenia and it is not fetching then it vomit the natka. If something is bantering then it vomit the patsy. If something vomit the eugenia and it vomit the patsy then it does not eat the patsy. If something reap the patsy and it is not annalistic then the patsy does not need the eugenia. If the eugenia is fungal and the eugenia does not need the patsy then the patsy vomit the eugenia. The natka vomit the eugenia.", "logic": "\nnot Reap(eugenia, natka)\nnot Reap(patsy, eugenia)\nReap(patsy, natka)\nFetching(patsy)\nBantering(patsy)\nnot Annalistic(patsy)\nVomit(patsy, eugenia)\nnot Vomit(patsy, natka)\nReap(natka, patsy)\nDedicate(natka, eugenia)\nnot Fetching(natka)\nVomit(natka, patsy)\nforall x (Reap(x, natka) and Vomit(x, patsy) -> Vomit(natka, eugenia))\nforall x (Dedicate(x, eugenia) and not Fetching(x) -> Vomit(x, natka))\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Vomit(x, patsy))\nforall x (Vomit(x, eugenia) and Vomit(x, patsy) -> not Dedicate(x, patsy))\nforall x (Reap(x, patsy) and not Annalistic(x) -> not Vomit(patsy, eugenia))\nFungal(eugenia) and not Vomit(eugenia, patsy) -> Vomit(patsy, eugenia)\n\nVomit(natka, eugenia)\n\nBantering(patsy) and forall x (Bantering(x) -> Vomit(x, patsy)) -> therefore Vomit(patsy, patsy) Reap(patsy, natka) and Vomit(patsy, patsy) and forall x (Reap(x, natka) and Vomit(x, patsy) -> Vomit(natka, eugenia)) -> therefore Vomit(natka, eugenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The welsh does not chase the debor. The sloan does not chase the welsh. The sloan flounce the debor. The sloan is pietistic. The sloan is pianissimo. The sloan is not analyzable. The sloan jettison the welsh. The sloan does not need the debor. The debor flounce the sloan. The debor blot the welsh. The debor is not pietistic. The debor jettison the sloan. If something flounce the debor and it jettison the sloan then the debor jettison the welsh. If something blot the welsh and it is not pietistic then it jettison the debor. If something is pianissimo then it jettison the sloan. If something jettison the welsh and it jettison the sloan then it does not eat the sloan. If something flounce the sloan and it is not analyzable then the sloan does not need the welsh. If the welsh is incased and the welsh does not need the sloan then the sloan jettison the welsh. The debor does not need the welsh.", "logic": "\nnot Flounce(welsh, debor)\nnot Flounce(sloan, welsh)\nFlounce(sloan, debor)\nPietistic(sloan)\nPianissimo(sloan)\nnot Analyzable(sloan)\nJettison(sloan, welsh)\nnot Jettison(sloan, debor)\nFlounce(debor, sloan)\nBlot(debor, welsh)\nnot Pietistic(debor)\nJettison(debor, sloan)\nforall x (Flounce(x, debor) and Jettison(x, sloan) -> Jettison(debor, welsh))\nforall x (Blot(x, welsh) and not Pietistic(x) -> Jettison(x, debor))\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Jettison(x, sloan))\nforall x (Jettison(x, welsh) and Jettison(x, sloan) -> not Blot(x, sloan))\nforall x (Flounce(x, sloan) and not Analyzable(x) -> not Jettison(sloan, welsh))\nIncased(welsh) and not Jettison(welsh, sloan) -> Jettison(sloan, welsh)\n\nnot Jettison(debor, welsh)\n\nPianissimo(sloan) and forall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Jettison(x, sloan)) -> therefore Jettison(sloan, sloan) Flounce(sloan, debor) and Jettison(sloan, sloan) and forall x (Flounce(x, debor) and Jettison(x, sloan) -> Jettison(debor, welsh)) -> therefore Jettison(debor, welsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The sari does not chase the nanci. The erda does not chase the sari. The erda honor the nanci. The erda is debatable. The erda is perpetual. The erda is not actuarial. The erda dethrone the sari. The erda does not need the nanci. The nanci honor the erda. The nanci recount the sari. The nanci is not debatable. The nanci dethrone the erda. If something honor the nanci and it dethrone the erda then the nanci dethrone the sari. If something recount the sari and it is not debatable then it dethrone the nanci. If something is perpetual then it dethrone the erda. If something dethrone the sari and it dethrone the erda then it does not eat the erda. If something honor the erda and it is not actuarial then the erda does not need the sari. If the sari is untenable and the sari does not need the erda then the erda dethrone the sari. The nanci does not eat the erda.", "logic": "\nnot Honor(sari, nanci)\nnot Honor(erda, sari)\nHonor(erda, nanci)\nDebatable(erda)\nPerpetual(erda)\nnot Actuarial(erda)\nDethrone(erda, sari)\nnot Dethrone(erda, nanci)\nHonor(nanci, erda)\nRecount(nanci, sari)\nnot Debatable(nanci)\nDethrone(nanci, erda)\nforall x (Honor(x, nanci) and Dethrone(x, erda) -> Dethrone(nanci, sari))\nforall x (Recount(x, sari) and not Debatable(x) -> Dethrone(x, nanci))\nforall x (Perpetual(x) -> Dethrone(x, erda))\nforall x (Dethrone(x, sari) and Dethrone(x, erda) -> not Recount(x, erda))\nforall x (Honor(x, erda) and not Actuarial(x) -> not Dethrone(erda, sari))\nUntenable(sari) and not Dethrone(sari, erda) -> Dethrone(erda, sari)\n\nnot Recount(nanci, erda)\n\nPerpetual(erda) and forall x (Perpetual(x) -> Dethrone(x, erda)) -> therefore Dethrone(erda, erda) Honor(erda, nanci) and Dethrone(erda, erda) and forall x (Honor(x, nanci) and Dethrone(x, erda) -> Dethrone(nanci, sari)) -> therefore Dethrone(nanci, sari) Dethrone(nanci, sari) and Dethrone(nanci, erda) and forall x (Dethrone(x, sari) and Dethrone(x, erda) -> not Recount(x, erda)) -> therefore not Recount(nanci, erda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The jarvis does not chase the orelie. The robin does not chase the jarvis. The robin chink the orelie. The robin is bilingual. The robin is outsized. The robin is not aldermanic. The robin demote the jarvis. The robin does not need the orelie. The orelie chink the robin. The orelie prick the jarvis. The orelie is not bilingual. The orelie demote the robin. If something chink the orelie and it demote the robin then the orelie demote the jarvis. If something prick the jarvis and it is not bilingual then it demote the orelie. If something is outsized then it demote the robin. If something demote the jarvis and it demote the robin then it does not eat the robin. If something chink the robin and it is not aldermanic then the robin does not need the jarvis. If the jarvis is textual and the jarvis does not need the robin then the robin demote the jarvis. The orelie prick the robin.", "logic": "\nnot Chink(jarvis, orelie)\nnot Chink(robin, jarvis)\nChink(robin, orelie)\nBilingual(robin)\nOutsized(robin)\nnot Aldermanic(robin)\nDemote(robin, jarvis)\nnot Demote(robin, orelie)\nChink(orelie, robin)\nPrick(orelie, jarvis)\nnot Bilingual(orelie)\nDemote(orelie, robin)\nforall x (Chink(x, orelie) and Demote(x, robin) -> Demote(orelie, jarvis))\nforall x (Prick(x, jarvis) and not Bilingual(x) -> Demote(x, orelie))\nforall x (Outsized(x) -> Demote(x, robin))\nforall x (Demote(x, jarvis) and Demote(x, robin) -> not Prick(x, robin))\nforall x (Chink(x, robin) and not Aldermanic(x) -> not Demote(robin, jarvis))\nTextual(jarvis) and not Demote(jarvis, robin) -> Demote(robin, jarvis)\n\nPrick(orelie, robin)\n\nOutsized(robin) and forall x (Outsized(x) -> Demote(x, robin)) -> therefore Demote(robin, robin) Chink(robin, orelie) and Demote(robin, robin) and forall x (Chink(x, orelie) and Demote(x, robin) -> Demote(orelie, jarvis)) -> therefore Demote(orelie, jarvis) Demote(orelie, jarvis) and Demote(orelie, robin) and forall x (Demote(x, jarvis) and Demote(x, robin) -> not Prick(x, robin)) -> therefore not Prick(orelie, robin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The arron does not chase the cherish. The tootsie does not chase the arron. The tootsie distort the cherish. The tootsie is peninsular. The tootsie is neurotic. The tootsie is not snarled. The tootsie reshoot the arron. The tootsie does not need the cherish. The cherish distort the tootsie. The cherish crest the arron. The cherish is not peninsular. The cherish reshoot the tootsie. If something distort the cherish and it reshoot the tootsie then the cherish reshoot the arron. If something crest the arron and it is not peninsular then it reshoot the cherish. If something is neurotic then it reshoot the tootsie. If something reshoot the arron and it reshoot the tootsie then it does not eat the tootsie. If something distort the tootsie and it is not snarled then the tootsie does not need the arron. If the arron is forgotten and the arron does not need the tootsie then the tootsie reshoot the arron. The arron does not need the tootsie.", "logic": "\nnot Distort(arron, cherish)\nnot Distort(tootsie, arron)\nDistort(tootsie, cherish)\nPeninsular(tootsie)\nNeurotic(tootsie)\nnot Snarled(tootsie)\nReshoot(tootsie, arron)\nnot Reshoot(tootsie, cherish)\nDistort(cherish, tootsie)\nCrest(cherish, arron)\nnot Peninsular(cherish)\nReshoot(cherish, tootsie)\nforall x (Distort(x, cherish) and Reshoot(x, tootsie) -> Reshoot(cherish, arron))\nforall x (Crest(x, arron) and not Peninsular(x) -> Reshoot(x, cherish))\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Reshoot(x, tootsie))\nforall x (Reshoot(x, arron) and Reshoot(x, tootsie) -> not Crest(x, tootsie))\nforall x (Distort(x, tootsie) and not Snarled(x) -> not Reshoot(tootsie, arron))\nForgotten(arron) and not Reshoot(arron, tootsie) -> Reshoot(tootsie, arron)\n\nnot Reshoot(arron, tootsie)\n\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Reshoot(x, tootsie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The fairfax does not chase the florentia. The wallas does not chase the fairfax. The wallas blister the florentia. The wallas is adamantine. The wallas is sevenfold. The wallas is not tinned. The wallas caulk the fairfax. The wallas does not need the florentia. The florentia blister the wallas. The florentia deport the fairfax. The florentia is not adamantine. The florentia caulk the wallas. If something blister the florentia and it caulk the wallas then the florentia caulk the fairfax. If something deport the fairfax and it is not adamantine then it caulk the florentia. If something is sevenfold then it caulk the wallas. If something caulk the fairfax and it caulk the wallas then it does not eat the wallas. If something blister the wallas and it is not tinned then the wallas does not need the fairfax. If the fairfax is eidetic and the fairfax does not need the wallas then the wallas caulk the fairfax. The fairfax caulk the florentia.", "logic": "\nnot Blister(fairfax, florentia)\nnot Blister(wallas, fairfax)\nBlister(wallas, florentia)\nAdamantine(wallas)\nSevenfold(wallas)\nnot Tinned(wallas)\nCaulk(wallas, fairfax)\nnot Caulk(wallas, florentia)\nBlister(florentia, wallas)\nDeport(florentia, fairfax)\nnot Adamantine(florentia)\nCaulk(florentia, wallas)\nforall x (Blister(x, florentia) and Caulk(x, wallas) -> Caulk(florentia, fairfax))\nforall x (Deport(x, fairfax) and not Adamantine(x) -> Caulk(x, florentia))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) -> Caulk(x, wallas))\nforall x (Caulk(x, fairfax) and Caulk(x, wallas) -> not Deport(x, wallas))\nforall x (Blister(x, wallas) and not Tinned(x) -> not Caulk(wallas, fairfax))\nEidetic(fairfax) and not Caulk(fairfax, wallas) -> Caulk(wallas, fairfax)\n\nCaulk(fairfax, florentia)\n\nforall x (Deport(x, fairfax) and not Adamantine(x) -> Caulk(x, florentia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The fonzie does not chase the alvinia. The denys does not chase the fonzie. The denys blue the alvinia. The denys is obsequious. The denys is fumed. The denys is not acetylic. The denys declare the fonzie. The denys does not need the alvinia. The alvinia blue the denys. The alvinia flame the fonzie. The alvinia is not obsequious. The alvinia declare the denys. If something blue the alvinia and it declare the denys then the alvinia declare the fonzie. If something flame the fonzie and it is not obsequious then it declare the alvinia. If something is fumed then it declare the denys. If something declare the fonzie and it declare the denys then it does not eat the denys. If something blue the denys and it is not acetylic then the denys does not need the fonzie. If the fonzie is monocled and the fonzie does not need the denys then the denys declare the fonzie. The fonzie is not obsequious.", "logic": "\nnot Blue(fonzie, alvinia)\nnot Blue(denys, fonzie)\nBlue(denys, alvinia)\nObsequious(denys)\nFumed(denys)\nnot Acetylic(denys)\nDeclare(denys, fonzie)\nnot Declare(denys, alvinia)\nBlue(alvinia, denys)\nFlame(alvinia, fonzie)\nnot Obsequious(alvinia)\nDeclare(alvinia, denys)\nforall x (Blue(x, alvinia) and Declare(x, denys) -> Declare(alvinia, fonzie))\nforall x (Flame(x, fonzie) and not Obsequious(x) -> Declare(x, alvinia))\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Declare(x, denys))\nforall x (Declare(x, fonzie) and Declare(x, denys) -> not Flame(x, denys))\nforall x (Blue(x, denys) and not Acetylic(x) -> not Declare(denys, fonzie))\nMonocled(fonzie) and not Declare(fonzie, denys) -> Declare(denys, fonzie)\n\nnot Obsequious(fonzie)\n\nnot Obsequious(fonzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The marga does not chase the dana. The anni does not chase the marga. The anni marinade the dana. The anni is rhythmical. The anni is powered. The anni is not cataleptic. The anni rinse the marga. The anni does not need the dana. The dana marinade the anni. The dana wait the marga. The dana is not rhythmical. The dana rinse the anni. If something marinade the dana and it rinse the anni then the dana rinse the marga. If something wait the marga and it is not rhythmical then it rinse the dana. If something is powered then it rinse the anni. If something rinse the marga and it rinse the anni then it does not eat the anni. If something marinade the anni and it is not cataleptic then the anni does not need the marga. If the marga is acetabular and the marga does not need the anni then the anni rinse the marga. The marga marinade the marga.", "logic": "\nnot Marinade(marga, dana)\nnot Marinade(anni, marga)\nMarinade(anni, dana)\nRhythmical(anni)\nPowered(anni)\nnot Cataleptic(anni)\nRinse(anni, marga)\nnot Rinse(anni, dana)\nMarinade(dana, anni)\nWait(dana, marga)\nnot Rhythmical(dana)\nRinse(dana, anni)\nforall x (Marinade(x, dana) and Rinse(x, anni) -> Rinse(dana, marga))\nforall x (Wait(x, marga) and not Rhythmical(x) -> Rinse(x, dana))\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Rinse(x, anni))\nforall x (Rinse(x, marga) and Rinse(x, anni) -> not Wait(x, anni))\nforall x (Marinade(x, anni) and not Cataleptic(x) -> not Rinse(anni, marga))\nAcetabular(marga) and not Rinse(marga, anni) -> Rinse(anni, marga)\n\nMarinade(marga, marga)\n\nMarinade(marga, marga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The clarisse does not chase the waine. The davin does not chase the clarisse. The davin complicate the waine. The davin is unstinted. The davin is shortish. The davin is not anginous. The davin drill the clarisse. The davin does not need the waine. The waine complicate the davin. The waine stimulate the clarisse. The waine is not unstinted. The waine drill the davin. If something complicate the waine and it drill the davin then the waine drill the clarisse. If something stimulate the clarisse and it is not unstinted then it drill the waine. If something is shortish then it drill the davin. If something drill the clarisse and it drill the davin then it does not eat the davin. If something complicate the davin and it is not anginous then the davin does not need the clarisse. If the clarisse is animated and the clarisse does not need the davin then the davin drill the clarisse. The waine does not chase the clarisse.", "logic": "\nnot Complicate(clarisse, waine)\nnot Complicate(davin, clarisse)\nComplicate(davin, waine)\nUnstinted(davin)\nShortish(davin)\nnot Anginous(davin)\nDrill(davin, clarisse)\nnot Drill(davin, waine)\nComplicate(waine, davin)\nStimulate(waine, clarisse)\nnot Unstinted(waine)\nDrill(waine, davin)\nforall x (Complicate(x, waine) and Drill(x, davin) -> Drill(waine, clarisse))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, clarisse) and not Unstinted(x) -> Drill(x, waine))\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Drill(x, davin))\nforall x (Drill(x, clarisse) and Drill(x, davin) -> not Stimulate(x, davin))\nforall x (Complicate(x, davin) and not Anginous(x) -> not Drill(davin, clarisse))\nAnimated(clarisse) and not Drill(clarisse, davin) -> Drill(davin, clarisse)\n\nnot Complicate(waine, clarisse)\n\nnot Complicate(waine, clarisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The pearl does not chase the flori. The thaddius does not chase the pearl. The thaddius smooth the flori. The thaddius is voiceless. The thaddius is serried. The thaddius is not thoriated. The thaddius skate the pearl. The thaddius does not need the flori. The flori smooth the thaddius. The flori emanate the pearl. The flori is not voiceless. The flori skate the thaddius. If something smooth the flori and it skate the thaddius then the flori skate the pearl. If something emanate the pearl and it is not voiceless then it skate the flori. If something is serried then it skate the thaddius. If something skate the pearl and it skate the thaddius then it does not eat the thaddius. If something smooth the thaddius and it is not thoriated then the thaddius does not need the pearl. If the pearl is boolean and the pearl does not need the thaddius then the thaddius skate the pearl. The pearl emanate the thaddius.", "logic": "\nnot Smooth(pearl, flori)\nnot Smooth(thaddius, pearl)\nSmooth(thaddius, flori)\nVoiceless(thaddius)\nSerried(thaddius)\nnot Thoriated(thaddius)\nSkate(thaddius, pearl)\nnot Skate(thaddius, flori)\nSmooth(flori, thaddius)\nEmanate(flori, pearl)\nnot Voiceless(flori)\nSkate(flori, thaddius)\nforall x (Smooth(x, flori) and Skate(x, thaddius) -> Skate(flori, pearl))\nforall x (Emanate(x, pearl) and not Voiceless(x) -> Skate(x, flori))\nforall x (Serried(x) -> Skate(x, thaddius))\nforall x (Skate(x, pearl) and Skate(x, thaddius) -> not Emanate(x, thaddius))\nforall x (Smooth(x, thaddius) and not Thoriated(x) -> not Skate(thaddius, pearl))\nBoolean(pearl) and not Skate(pearl, thaddius) -> Skate(thaddius, pearl)\n\nEmanate(pearl, thaddius)\n\nEmanate(pearl, thaddius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The lloyd does not chase the konrad. The hermia does not chase the lloyd. The hermia reseat the konrad. The hermia is preeminent. The hermia is pilous. The hermia is not rhizoidal. The hermia anathemize the lloyd. The hermia does not need the konrad. The konrad reseat the hermia. The konrad muse the lloyd. The konrad is not preeminent. The konrad anathemize the hermia. If something reseat the konrad and it anathemize the hermia then the konrad anathemize the lloyd. If something muse the lloyd and it is not preeminent then it anathemize the konrad. If something is pilous then it anathemize the hermia. If something anathemize the lloyd and it anathemize the hermia then it does not eat the hermia. If something reseat the hermia and it is not rhizoidal then the hermia does not need the lloyd. If the lloyd is spectral and the lloyd does not need the hermia then the hermia anathemize the lloyd. The lloyd does not eat the konrad.", "logic": "\nnot Reseat(lloyd, konrad)\nnot Reseat(hermia, lloyd)\nReseat(hermia, konrad)\nPreeminent(hermia)\nPilous(hermia)\nnot Rhizoidal(hermia)\nAnathemize(hermia, lloyd)\nnot Anathemize(hermia, konrad)\nReseat(konrad, hermia)\nMuse(konrad, lloyd)\nnot Preeminent(konrad)\nAnathemize(konrad, hermia)\nforall x (Reseat(x, konrad) and Anathemize(x, hermia) -> Anathemize(konrad, lloyd))\nforall x (Muse(x, lloyd) and not Preeminent(x) -> Anathemize(x, konrad))\nforall x (Pilous(x) -> Anathemize(x, hermia))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, lloyd) and Anathemize(x, hermia) -> not Muse(x, hermia))\nforall x (Reseat(x, hermia) and not Rhizoidal(x) -> not Anathemize(hermia, lloyd))\nSpectral(lloyd) and not Anathemize(lloyd, hermia) -> Anathemize(hermia, lloyd)\n\nnot Muse(lloyd, konrad)\n\nnot Muse(lloyd, konrad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The lia does not chase the phylis. The harmon does not chase the lia. The harmon resettle the phylis. The harmon is aloof. The harmon is changeable. The harmon is not drear. The harmon palter the lia. The harmon does not need the phylis. The phylis resettle the harmon. The phylis constitute the lia. The phylis is not aloof. The phylis palter the harmon. If something resettle the phylis and it palter the harmon then the phylis palter the lia. If something constitute the lia and it is not aloof then it palter the phylis. If something is changeable then it palter the harmon. If something palter the lia and it palter the harmon then it does not eat the harmon. If something resettle the harmon and it is not drear then the harmon does not need the lia. If the lia is collateral and the lia does not need the harmon then the harmon palter the lia. The lia resettle the harmon.", "logic": "\nnot Resettle(lia, phylis)\nnot Resettle(harmon, lia)\nResettle(harmon, phylis)\nAloof(harmon)\nChangeable(harmon)\nnot Drear(harmon)\nPalter(harmon, lia)\nnot Palter(harmon, phylis)\nResettle(phylis, harmon)\nConstitute(phylis, lia)\nnot Aloof(phylis)\nPalter(phylis, harmon)\nforall x (Resettle(x, phylis) and Palter(x, harmon) -> Palter(phylis, lia))\nforall x (Constitute(x, lia) and not Aloof(x) -> Palter(x, phylis))\nforall x (Changeable(x) -> Palter(x, harmon))\nforall x (Palter(x, lia) and Palter(x, harmon) -> not Constitute(x, harmon))\nforall x (Resettle(x, harmon) and not Drear(x) -> not Palter(harmon, lia))\nCollateral(lia) and not Palter(lia, harmon) -> Palter(harmon, lia)\n\nResettle(lia, harmon)\n\nResettle(lia, harmon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The elena machine the wandis. The hasty does not eat the wolfie. The wandis worship the wolfie. The wolfie is painted. If something erase the elena then the elena does not chase the wandis. If something worship the wandis and the wandis is painted then it machine the wolfie. If something is painted then it is practical. If something machine the wandis then it is twoscore. If something erase the elena and it machine the wolfie then the elena machine the wandis. If something machine the wandis and it does not visit the hasty then the wandis does not eat the elena. If something is twoscore then it is painted. If something is painted and it worship the elena then it worship the wolfie. The hasty does not eat the wolfie.", "logic": "\nMachine(elena, wandis)\nnot Machine(hasty, wolfie)\nWorship(wandis, wolfie)\nPainted(wolfie)\nforall x (Erase(x, elena) -> not Erase(elena, wandis))\nforall x (Worship(x, wandis) and Painted(wandis) -> Machine(x, wolfie))\nforall x (Painted(x) -> Practical(x))\nforall x (Machine(x, wandis) -> Twoscore(x))\nforall x (Erase(x, elena) and Machine(x, wolfie) -> Machine(elena, wandis))\nforall x (Machine(x, wandis) and not Worship(x, hasty) -> not Machine(wandis, elena))\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Painted(x))\nforall x (Painted(x) and Worship(x, elena) -> Worship(x, wolfie))\n\nnot Machine(hasty, wolfie)\n\ntherefore not Machine(hasty, wolfie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The tedie sideline the annamaria. The ethelin does not eat the lari. The annamaria imitate the lari. The lari is stray. If something smooth the tedie then the tedie does not chase the annamaria. If something imitate the annamaria and the annamaria is stray then it sideline the lari. If something is stray then it is syncretic. If something sideline the annamaria then it is idiomatic. If something smooth the tedie and it sideline the lari then the tedie sideline the annamaria. If something sideline the annamaria and it does not visit the ethelin then the annamaria does not eat the tedie. If something is idiomatic then it is stray. If something is stray and it imitate the tedie then it imitate the lari. The lari is not stray.", "logic": "\nSideline(tedie, annamaria)\nnot Sideline(ethelin, lari)\nImitate(annamaria, lari)\nStray(lari)\nforall x (Smooth(x, tedie) -> not Smooth(tedie, annamaria))\nforall x (Imitate(x, annamaria) and Stray(annamaria) -> Sideline(x, lari))\nforall x (Stray(x) -> Syncretic(x))\nforall x (Sideline(x, annamaria) -> Idiomatic(x))\nforall x (Smooth(x, tedie) and Sideline(x, lari) -> Sideline(tedie, annamaria))\nforall x (Sideline(x, annamaria) and not Imitate(x, ethelin) -> not Sideline(annamaria, tedie))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) and Imitate(x, tedie) -> Imitate(x, lari))\n\nnot Stray(lari)\n\ntherefore Stray(lari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The leonidas saltate the judy. The kane does not eat the babette. The judy metricise the babette. The babette is orangish. If something castrate the leonidas then the leonidas does not chase the judy. If something metricise the judy and the judy is orangish then it saltate the babette. If something is orangish then it is illusional. If something saltate the judy then it is reposeful. If something castrate the leonidas and it saltate the babette then the leonidas saltate the judy. If something saltate the judy and it does not visit the kane then the judy does not eat the leonidas. If something is reposeful then it is orangish. If something is orangish and it metricise the leonidas then it metricise the babette. The leonidas is reposeful.", "logic": "\nSaltate(leonidas, judy)\nnot Saltate(kane, babette)\nMetricise(judy, babette)\nOrangish(babette)\nforall x (Castrate(x, leonidas) -> not Castrate(leonidas, judy))\nforall x (Metricise(x, judy) and Orangish(judy) -> Saltate(x, babette))\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Saltate(x, judy) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Castrate(x, leonidas) and Saltate(x, babette) -> Saltate(leonidas, judy))\nforall x (Saltate(x, judy) and not Metricise(x, kane) -> not Saltate(judy, leonidas))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Orangish(x) and Metricise(x, leonidas) -> Metricise(x, babette))\n\nReposeful(leonidas)\n\nSaltate(leonidas, judy) and forall x (Saltate(x, judy) -> Reposeful(x)) -> therefore Reposeful(leonidas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The thedrick enhance the shaylyn. The happy does not eat the reid. The shaylyn census the reid. The reid is indecorous. If something kite the thedrick then the thedrick does not chase the shaylyn. If something census the shaylyn and the shaylyn is indecorous then it enhance the reid. If something is indecorous then it is sciolistic. If something enhance the shaylyn then it is flagellate. If something kite the thedrick and it enhance the reid then the thedrick enhance the shaylyn. If something enhance the shaylyn and it does not visit the happy then the shaylyn does not eat the thedrick. If something is flagellate then it is indecorous. If something is indecorous and it census the thedrick then it census the reid. The reid is not sciolistic.", "logic": "\nEnhance(thedrick, shaylyn)\nnot Enhance(happy, reid)\nCensus(shaylyn, reid)\nIndecorous(reid)\nforall x (Kite(x, thedrick) -> not Kite(thedrick, shaylyn))\nforall x (Census(x, shaylyn) and Indecorous(shaylyn) -> Enhance(x, reid))\nforall x (Indecorous(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (Enhance(x, shaylyn) -> Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Kite(x, thedrick) and Enhance(x, reid) -> Enhance(thedrick, shaylyn))\nforall x (Enhance(x, shaylyn) and not Census(x, happy) -> not Enhance(shaylyn, thedrick))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) -> Indecorous(x))\nforall x (Indecorous(x) and Census(x, thedrick) -> Census(x, reid))\n\nnot Sciolistic(reid)\n\nIndecorous(reid) and forall x (Indecorous(x) -> Sciolistic(x)) -> therefore Sciolistic(reid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The giffy pile the mariel. The douglis does not eat the madella. The mariel refine the madella. The madella is clogging. If something communise the giffy then the giffy does not chase the mariel. If something refine the mariel and the mariel is clogging then it pile the madella. If something is clogging then it is contiguous. If something pile the mariel then it is stillborn. If something communise the giffy and it pile the madella then the giffy pile the mariel. If something pile the mariel and it does not visit the douglis then the mariel does not eat the giffy. If something is stillborn then it is clogging. If something is clogging and it refine the giffy then it refine the madella. The giffy is clogging.", "logic": "\nPile(giffy, mariel)\nnot Pile(douglis, madella)\nRefine(mariel, madella)\nClogging(madella)\nforall x (Communise(x, giffy) -> not Communise(giffy, mariel))\nforall x (Refine(x, mariel) and Clogging(mariel) -> Pile(x, madella))\nforall x (Clogging(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Pile(x, mariel) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Communise(x, giffy) and Pile(x, madella) -> Pile(giffy, mariel))\nforall x (Pile(x, mariel) and not Refine(x, douglis) -> not Pile(mariel, giffy))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Clogging(x))\nforall x (Clogging(x) and Refine(x, giffy) -> Refine(x, madella))\n\nClogging(giffy)\n\nPile(giffy, mariel) and forall x (Pile(x, mariel) -> Stillborn(x)) -> therefore Stillborn(giffy) Stillborn(giffy) and forall x (Stillborn(x) -> Clogging(x)) -> therefore Clogging(giffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The monika hope the lazaro. The bettina does not eat the norina. The lazaro abet the norina. The norina is symmetric. If something dupe the monika then the monika does not chase the lazaro. If something abet the lazaro and the lazaro is symmetric then it hope the norina. If something is symmetric then it is resultant. If something hope the lazaro then it is abactinal. If something dupe the monika and it hope the norina then the monika hope the lazaro. If something hope the lazaro and it does not visit the bettina then the lazaro does not eat the monika. If something is abactinal then it is symmetric. If something is symmetric and it abet the monika then it abet the norina. The monika is not symmetric.", "logic": "\nHope(monika, lazaro)\nnot Hope(bettina, norina)\nAbet(lazaro, norina)\nSymmetric(norina)\nforall x (Dupe(x, monika) -> not Dupe(monika, lazaro))\nforall x (Abet(x, lazaro) and Symmetric(lazaro) -> Hope(x, norina))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Resultant(x))\nforall x (Hope(x, lazaro) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Dupe(x, monika) and Hope(x, norina) -> Hope(monika, lazaro))\nforall x (Hope(x, lazaro) and not Abet(x, bettina) -> not Hope(lazaro, monika))\nforall x (Abactinal(x) -> Symmetric(x))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and Abet(x, monika) -> Abet(x, norina))\n\nnot Symmetric(monika)\n\nHope(monika, lazaro) and forall x (Hope(x, lazaro) -> Abactinal(x)) -> therefore Abactinal(monika) Abactinal(monika) and forall x (Abactinal(x) -> Symmetric(x)) -> therefore Symmetric(monika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The averyl quarantine the sela. The norwood does not eat the bayard. The sela fancy the bayard. The bayard is parous. If something default the averyl then the averyl does not chase the sela. If something fancy the sela and the sela is parous then it quarantine the bayard. If something is parous then it is equatorial. If something quarantine the sela then it is corsican. If something default the averyl and it quarantine the bayard then the averyl quarantine the sela. If something quarantine the sela and it does not visit the norwood then the sela does not eat the averyl. If something is corsican then it is parous. If something is parous and it fancy the averyl then it fancy the bayard. The averyl is equatorial.", "logic": "\nQuarantine(averyl, sela)\nnot Quarantine(norwood, bayard)\nFancy(sela, bayard)\nParous(bayard)\nforall x (Default(x, averyl) -> not Default(averyl, sela))\nforall x (Fancy(x, sela) and Parous(sela) -> Quarantine(x, bayard))\nforall x (Parous(x) -> Equatorial(x))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, sela) -> Corsican(x))\nforall x (Default(x, averyl) and Quarantine(x, bayard) -> Quarantine(averyl, sela))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, sela) and not Fancy(x, norwood) -> not Quarantine(sela, averyl))\nforall x (Corsican(x) -> Parous(x))\nforall x (Parous(x) and Fancy(x, averyl) -> Fancy(x, bayard))\n\nEquatorial(averyl)\n\nQuarantine(averyl, sela) and forall x (Quarantine(x, sela) -> Corsican(x)) -> therefore Corsican(averyl) Corsican(averyl) and forall x (Corsican(x) -> Parous(x)) -> therefore Parous(averyl) Parous(averyl) and forall x (Parous(x) -> Equatorial(x)) -> therefore Equatorial(averyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The germain overstrain the gerrilee. The godfry does not eat the fletch. The gerrilee readjust the fletch. The fletch is alone. If something grey the germain then the germain does not chase the gerrilee. If something readjust the gerrilee and the gerrilee is alone then it overstrain the fletch. If something is alone then it is manichaean. If something overstrain the gerrilee then it is liquescent. If something grey the germain and it overstrain the fletch then the germain overstrain the gerrilee. If something overstrain the gerrilee and it does not visit the godfry then the gerrilee does not eat the germain. If something is liquescent then it is alone. If something is alone and it readjust the germain then it readjust the fletch. The germain is not manichaean.", "logic": "\nOverstrain(germain, gerrilee)\nnot Overstrain(godfry, fletch)\nReadjust(gerrilee, fletch)\nAlone(fletch)\nforall x (Grey(x, germain) -> not Grey(germain, gerrilee))\nforall x (Readjust(x, gerrilee) and Alone(gerrilee) -> Overstrain(x, fletch))\nforall x (Alone(x) -> Manichaean(x))\nforall x (Overstrain(x, gerrilee) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Grey(x, germain) and Overstrain(x, fletch) -> Overstrain(germain, gerrilee))\nforall x (Overstrain(x, gerrilee) and not Readjust(x, godfry) -> not Overstrain(gerrilee, germain))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) -> Alone(x))\nforall x (Alone(x) and Readjust(x, germain) -> Readjust(x, fletch))\n\nnot Manichaean(germain)\n\nOverstrain(germain, gerrilee) and forall x (Overstrain(x, gerrilee) -> Liquescent(x)) -> therefore Liquescent(germain) Liquescent(germain) and forall x (Liquescent(x) -> Alone(x)) -> therefore Alone(germain) Alone(germain) and forall x (Alone(x) -> Manichaean(x)) -> therefore Manichaean(germain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The reid content the englebart. The eulalie does not eat the reg. The englebart subject the reg. The reg is batty. If something dillydally the reid then the reid does not chase the englebart. If something subject the englebart and the englebart is batty then it content the reg. If something is batty then it is nodulose. If something content the englebart then it is dissolute. If something dillydally the reid and it content the reg then the reid content the englebart. If something content the englebart and it does not visit the eulalie then the englebart does not eat the reid. If something is dissolute then it is batty. If something is batty and it subject the reid then it subject the reg. The eulalie does not visit the reg.", "logic": "\nContent(reid, englebart)\nnot Content(eulalie, reg)\nSubject(englebart, reg)\nBatty(reg)\nforall x (Dillydally(x, reid) -> not Dillydally(reid, englebart))\nforall x (Subject(x, englebart) and Batty(englebart) -> Content(x, reg))\nforall x (Batty(x) -> Nodulose(x))\nforall x (Content(x, englebart) -> Dissolute(x))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, reid) and Content(x, reg) -> Content(reid, englebart))\nforall x (Content(x, englebart) and not Subject(x, eulalie) -> not Content(englebart, reid))\nforall x (Dissolute(x) -> Batty(x))\nforall x (Batty(x) and Subject(x, reid) -> Subject(x, reg))\n\nnot Subject(eulalie, reg)\n\nforall x (Batty(x) and Subject(x, reid) -> Subject(x, reg)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The rita pyramid the ronnica. The eliot does not eat the dmitri. The ronnica bandage the dmitri. The dmitri is reptilian. If something demo the rita then the rita does not chase the ronnica. If something bandage the ronnica and the ronnica is reptilian then it pyramid the dmitri. If something is reptilian then it is maledict. If something pyramid the ronnica then it is czaristic. If something demo the rita and it pyramid the dmitri then the rita pyramid the ronnica. If something pyramid the ronnica and it does not visit the eliot then the ronnica does not eat the rita. If something is czaristic then it is reptilian. If something is reptilian and it bandage the rita then it bandage the dmitri. The dmitri is czaristic.", "logic": "\nPyramid(rita, ronnica)\nnot Pyramid(eliot, dmitri)\nBandage(ronnica, dmitri)\nReptilian(dmitri)\nforall x (Demo(x, rita) -> not Demo(rita, ronnica))\nforall x (Bandage(x, ronnica) and Reptilian(ronnica) -> Pyramid(x, dmitri))\nforall x (Reptilian(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, ronnica) -> Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Demo(x, rita) and Pyramid(x, dmitri) -> Pyramid(rita, ronnica))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, ronnica) and not Bandage(x, eliot) -> not Pyramid(ronnica, rita))\nforall x (Czaristic(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Reptilian(x) and Bandage(x, rita) -> Bandage(x, dmitri))\n\nCzaristic(dmitri)\n\nforall x (Pyramid(x, ronnica) -> Czaristic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The nathalia ammonify the annice. The leland does not eat the cecelia. The annice exasperate the cecelia. The cecelia is numb. If something disallow the nathalia then the nathalia does not chase the annice. If something exasperate the annice and the annice is numb then it ammonify the cecelia. If something is numb then it is mindless. If something ammonify the annice then it is residual. If something disallow the nathalia and it ammonify the cecelia then the nathalia ammonify the annice. If something ammonify the annice and it does not visit the leland then the annice does not eat the nathalia. If something is residual then it is numb. If something is numb and it exasperate the nathalia then it exasperate the cecelia. The nathalia does not visit the cecelia.", "logic": "\nAmmonify(nathalia, annice)\nnot Ammonify(leland, cecelia)\nExasperate(annice, cecelia)\nNumb(cecelia)\nforall x (Disallow(x, nathalia) -> not Disallow(nathalia, annice))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, annice) and Numb(annice) -> Ammonify(x, cecelia))\nforall x (Numb(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Ammonify(x, annice) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Disallow(x, nathalia) and Ammonify(x, cecelia) -> Ammonify(nathalia, annice))\nforall x (Ammonify(x, annice) and not Exasperate(x, leland) -> not Ammonify(annice, nathalia))\nforall x (Residual(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Numb(x) and Exasperate(x, nathalia) -> Exasperate(x, cecelia))\n\nnot Exasperate(nathalia, cecelia)\n\nforall x (Numb(x) and Exasperate(x, nathalia) -> Exasperate(x, cecelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The patrizia regulate the ardelis. The ford does not eat the avery. The ardelis conflate the avery. The avery is steamy. If something moan the patrizia then the patrizia does not chase the ardelis. If something conflate the ardelis and the ardelis is steamy then it regulate the avery. If something is steamy then it is scots. If something regulate the ardelis then it is subgross. If something moan the patrizia and it regulate the avery then the patrizia regulate the ardelis. If something regulate the ardelis and it does not visit the ford then the ardelis does not eat the patrizia. If something is subgross then it is steamy. If something is steamy and it conflate the patrizia then it conflate the avery. The ford is scots.", "logic": "\nRegulate(patrizia, ardelis)\nnot Regulate(ford, avery)\nConflate(ardelis, avery)\nSteamy(avery)\nforall x (Moan(x, patrizia) -> not Moan(patrizia, ardelis))\nforall x (Conflate(x, ardelis) and Steamy(ardelis) -> Regulate(x, avery))\nforall x (Steamy(x) -> Scots(x))\nforall x (Regulate(x, ardelis) -> Subgross(x))\nforall x (Moan(x, patrizia) and Regulate(x, avery) -> Regulate(patrizia, ardelis))\nforall x (Regulate(x, ardelis) and not Conflate(x, ford) -> not Regulate(ardelis, patrizia))\nforall x (Subgross(x) -> Steamy(x))\nforall x (Steamy(x) and Conflate(x, patrizia) -> Conflate(x, avery))\n\nScots(ford)\n\nforall x (Steamy(x) -> Scots(x)) <- forall x (Subgross(x) -> Steamy(x)) <- forall x (Regulate(x, ardelis) -> Subgross(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The ardine associate the marketa. The kaile does not eat the sharra. The marketa pinpoint the sharra. The sharra is shortish. If something entertain the ardine then the ardine does not chase the marketa. If something pinpoint the marketa and the marketa is shortish then it associate the sharra. If something is shortish then it is tough. If something associate the marketa then it is unsoiled. If something entertain the ardine and it associate the sharra then the ardine associate the marketa. If something associate the marketa and it does not visit the kaile then the marketa does not eat the ardine. If something is unsoiled then it is shortish. If something is shortish and it pinpoint the ardine then it pinpoint the sharra. The kaile does not eat the ardine.", "logic": "\nAssociate(ardine, marketa)\nnot Associate(kaile, sharra)\nPinpoint(marketa, sharra)\nShortish(sharra)\nforall x (Entertain(x, ardine) -> not Entertain(ardine, marketa))\nforall x (Pinpoint(x, marketa) and Shortish(marketa) -> Associate(x, sharra))\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Tough(x))\nforall x (Associate(x, marketa) -> Unsoiled(x))\nforall x (Entertain(x, ardine) and Associate(x, sharra) -> Associate(ardine, marketa))\nforall x (Associate(x, marketa) and not Pinpoint(x, kaile) -> not Associate(marketa, ardine))\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) -> Shortish(x))\nforall x (Shortish(x) and Pinpoint(x, ardine) -> Pinpoint(x, sharra))\n\nnot Associate(kaile, ardine)\n\nnot Associate(kaile, ardine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The rakel advertize the ardene. The lanette does not eat the dorcas. The ardene cascade the dorcas. The dorcas is vented. If something unbind the rakel then the rakel does not chase the ardene. If something cascade the ardene and the ardene is vented then it advertize the dorcas. If something is vented then it is digestive. If something advertize the ardene then it is reasoned. If something unbind the rakel and it advertize the dorcas then the rakel advertize the ardene. If something advertize the ardene and it does not visit the lanette then the ardene does not eat the rakel. If something is reasoned then it is vented. If something is vented and it cascade the rakel then it cascade the dorcas. The ardene advertize the lanette.", "logic": "\nAdvertize(rakel, ardene)\nnot Advertize(lanette, dorcas)\nCascade(ardene, dorcas)\nVented(dorcas)\nforall x (Unbind(x, rakel) -> not Unbind(rakel, ardene))\nforall x (Cascade(x, ardene) and Vented(ardene) -> Advertize(x, dorcas))\nforall x (Vented(x) -> Digestive(x))\nforall x (Advertize(x, ardene) -> Reasoned(x))\nforall x (Unbind(x, rakel) and Advertize(x, dorcas) -> Advertize(rakel, ardene))\nforall x (Advertize(x, ardene) and not Cascade(x, lanette) -> not Advertize(ardene, rakel))\nforall x (Reasoned(x) -> Vented(x))\nforall x (Vented(x) and Cascade(x, rakel) -> Cascade(x, dorcas))\n\nAdvertize(ardene, lanette)\n\nAdvertize(ardene, lanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The paulina tousle the xaviera. The ora does not eat the gertruda. The xaviera gang the gertruda. The gertruda is enviable. If something chomp the paulina then the paulina does not chase the xaviera. If something gang the xaviera and the xaviera is enviable then it tousle the gertruda. If something is enviable then it is sparse. If something tousle the xaviera then it is potential. If something chomp the paulina and it tousle the gertruda then the paulina tousle the xaviera. If something tousle the xaviera and it does not visit the ora then the xaviera does not eat the paulina. If something is potential then it is enviable. If something is enviable and it gang the paulina then it gang the gertruda. The xaviera does not chase the paulina.", "logic": "\nTousle(paulina, xaviera)\nnot Tousle(ora, gertruda)\nGang(xaviera, gertruda)\nEnviable(gertruda)\nforall x (Chomp(x, paulina) -> not Chomp(paulina, xaviera))\nforall x (Gang(x, xaviera) and Enviable(xaviera) -> Tousle(x, gertruda))\nforall x (Enviable(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Tousle(x, xaviera) -> Potential(x))\nforall x (Chomp(x, paulina) and Tousle(x, gertruda) -> Tousle(paulina, xaviera))\nforall x (Tousle(x, xaviera) and not Gang(x, ora) -> not Tousle(xaviera, paulina))\nforall x (Potential(x) -> Enviable(x))\nforall x (Enviable(x) and Gang(x, paulina) -> Gang(x, gertruda))\n\nnot Chomp(xaviera, paulina)\n\nnot Chomp(xaviera, paulina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The robbi esterify the kimmo. The chad does not eat the madelyn. The kimmo sway the madelyn. The madelyn is tropical. If something pouch the robbi then the robbi does not chase the kimmo. If something sway the kimmo and the kimmo is tropical then it esterify the madelyn. If something is tropical then it is webbed. If something esterify the kimmo then it is worn. If something pouch the robbi and it esterify the madelyn then the robbi esterify the kimmo. If something esterify the kimmo and it does not visit the chad then the kimmo does not eat the robbi. If something is worn then it is tropical. If something is tropical and it sway the robbi then it sway the madelyn. The chad is round.", "logic": "\nEsterify(robbi, kimmo)\nnot Esterify(chad, madelyn)\nSway(kimmo, madelyn)\nTropical(madelyn)\nforall x (Pouch(x, robbi) -> not Pouch(robbi, kimmo))\nforall x (Sway(x, kimmo) and Tropical(kimmo) -> Esterify(x, madelyn))\nforall x (Tropical(x) -> Webbed(x))\nforall x (Esterify(x, kimmo) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Pouch(x, robbi) and Esterify(x, madelyn) -> Esterify(robbi, kimmo))\nforall x (Esterify(x, kimmo) and not Sway(x, chad) -> not Esterify(kimmo, robbi))\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Tropical(x))\nforall x (Tropical(x) and Sway(x, robbi) -> Sway(x, madelyn))\n\nRound(chad)\n\nRound(chad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "Adore is anorthitic. Adore is flammable. Adore is drizzling. Adore is concerned. Ingemar is anorectal. Ingemar is wifelike. Ingemar is concerned. If something is flammable then it is anorthitic. All concerned things are flammable. Kind things are wifelike. Nice, drizzling things are flammable. All anorthitic things are possessed. If Adore is anorectal and Adore is possessed then Adore is concerned. White things are anorectal. All drizzling things are wifelike. Adore is drizzling.", "logic": "\nAnorthitic(adore)\nFlammable(adore)\nDrizzling(adore)\nConcerned(adore)\nAnorectal(ingemar)\nWifelike(ingemar)\nConcerned(ingemar)\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Concerned(x) -> Flammable(x))\nforall x (Anorectal(x) -> Wifelike(x))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) and Drizzling(x) -> Flammable(x))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) -> Possessed(x))\nAnorectal(adore) and Possessed(adore) -> Concerned(adore)\nforall x (Concerned(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Drizzling(x) -> Wifelike(x))\n\nDrizzling(adore)\n\ntherefore Drizzling(adore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Hetti is prone. Hetti is biped. Hetti is biting. Hetti is pinnated. Lionello is whiplike. Lionello is unbiased. Lionello is pinnated. If something is biped then it is prone. All pinnated things are biped. Kind things are unbiased. Nice, biting things are biped. All prone things are dissipated. If Hetti is whiplike and Hetti is dissipated then Hetti is pinnated. White things are whiplike. All biting things are unbiased. Lionello is not unbiased.", "logic": "\nProne(hetti)\nBiped(hetti)\nBiting(hetti)\nPinnated(hetti)\nWhiplike(lionello)\nUnbiased(lionello)\nPinnated(lionello)\nforall x (Biped(x) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Pinnated(x) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Whiplike(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Biting(x) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Dissipated(x))\nWhiplike(hetti) and Dissipated(hetti) -> Pinnated(hetti)\nforall x (Pinnated(x) -> Whiplike(x))\nforall x (Biting(x) -> Unbiased(x))\n\nnot Unbiased(lionello)\n\ntherefore Unbiased(lionello)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Jazmin is select. Jazmin is acned. Jazmin is oversize. Jazmin is scientific. Alia is unrouged. Alia is lamplit. Alia is scientific. If something is acned then it is select. All scientific things are acned. Kind things are lamplit. Nice, oversize things are acned. All select things are aligned. If Jazmin is unrouged and Jazmin is aligned then Jazmin is scientific. White things are unrouged. All oversize things are lamplit. Alia is acned.", "logic": "\nSelect(jazmin)\nAcned(jazmin)\nOversize(jazmin)\nScientific(jazmin)\nUnrouged(alia)\nLamplit(alia)\nScientific(alia)\nforall x (Acned(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Scientific(x) -> Acned(x))\nforall x (Unrouged(x) -> Lamplit(x))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) and Oversize(x) -> Acned(x))\nforall x (Select(x) -> Aligned(x))\nUnrouged(jazmin) and Aligned(jazmin) -> Scientific(jazmin)\nforall x (Scientific(x) -> Unrouged(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) -> Lamplit(x))\n\nAcned(alia)\n\nScientific(alia) and forall x (Scientific(x) -> Acned(x)) -> therefore Acned(alia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Rodrique is biface. Rodrique is didactic. Rodrique is ribbony. Rodrique is ventricous. Brigit is cenozoic. Brigit is biggish. Brigit is ventricous. If something is didactic then it is biface. All ventricous things are didactic. Kind things are biggish. Nice, ribbony things are didactic. All biface things are juridical. If Rodrique is cenozoic and Rodrique is juridical then Rodrique is ventricous. White things are cenozoic. All ribbony things are biggish. Rodrique is not juridical.", "logic": "\nBiface(rodrique)\nDidactic(rodrique)\nRibbony(rodrique)\nVentricous(rodrique)\nCenozoic(brigit)\nBiggish(brigit)\nVentricous(brigit)\nforall x (Didactic(x) -> Biface(x))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> Didactic(x))\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) and Ribbony(x) -> Didactic(x))\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Juridical(x))\nCenozoic(rodrique) and Juridical(rodrique) -> Ventricous(rodrique)\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> Cenozoic(x))\nforall x (Ribbony(x) -> Biggish(x))\n\nnot Juridical(rodrique)\n\nBiface(rodrique) and forall x (Biface(x) -> Juridical(x)) -> therefore Juridical(rodrique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Shirlene is mussy. Shirlene is wonderful. Shirlene is emblematic. Shirlene is maddened. Nanete is indocile. Nanete is patched. Nanete is maddened. If something is wonderful then it is mussy. All maddened things are wonderful. Kind things are patched. Nice, emblematic things are wonderful. All mussy things are avellan. If Shirlene is indocile and Shirlene is avellan then Shirlene is maddened. White things are indocile. All emblematic things are patched. Nanete is mussy.", "logic": "\nMussy(shirlene)\nWonderful(shirlene)\nEmblematic(shirlene)\nMaddened(shirlene)\nIndocile(nanete)\nPatched(nanete)\nMaddened(nanete)\nforall x (Wonderful(x) -> Mussy(x))\nforall x (Maddened(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nforall x (Indocile(x) -> Patched(x))\nforall x (Patched(x) and Emblematic(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nforall x (Mussy(x) -> Avellan(x))\nIndocile(shirlene) and Avellan(shirlene) -> Maddened(shirlene)\nforall x (Maddened(x) -> Indocile(x))\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Patched(x))\n\nMussy(nanete)\n\nMaddened(nanete) and forall x (Maddened(x) -> Wonderful(x)) -> therefore Wonderful(nanete) Wonderful(nanete) and forall x (Wonderful(x) -> Mussy(x)) -> therefore Mussy(nanete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Ethan is sisyphean. Ethan is inapt. Ethan is choleric. Ethan is poised. Roanna is stalinist. Roanna is analytic. Roanna is poised. If something is inapt then it is sisyphean. All poised things are inapt. Kind things are analytic. Nice, choleric things are inapt. All sisyphean things are last. If Ethan is stalinist and Ethan is last then Ethan is poised. White things are stalinist. All choleric things are analytic. Roanna is not sisyphean.", "logic": "\nSisyphean(ethan)\nInapt(ethan)\nCholeric(ethan)\nPoised(ethan)\nStalinist(roanna)\nAnalytic(roanna)\nPoised(roanna)\nforall x (Inapt(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Inapt(x))\nforall x (Stalinist(x) -> Analytic(x))\nforall x (Analytic(x) and Choleric(x) -> Inapt(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Last(x))\nStalinist(ethan) and Last(ethan) -> Poised(ethan)\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Stalinist(x))\nforall x (Choleric(x) -> Analytic(x))\n\nnot Sisyphean(roanna)\n\nPoised(roanna) and forall x (Poised(x) -> Inapt(x)) -> therefore Inapt(roanna) Inapt(roanna) and forall x (Inapt(x) -> Sisyphean(x)) -> therefore Sisyphean(roanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Vick is unreached. Vick is frizzy. Vick is drippy. Vick is catalatic. Gwenn is colorful. Gwenn is chained. Gwenn is catalatic. If something is frizzy then it is unreached. All catalatic things are frizzy. Kind things are chained. Nice, drippy things are frizzy. All unreached things are then. If Vick is colorful and Vick is then then Vick is catalatic. White things are colorful. All drippy things are chained. Gwenn is then.", "logic": "\nUnreached(vick)\nFrizzy(vick)\nDrippy(vick)\nCatalatic(vick)\nColorful(gwenn)\nChained(gwenn)\nCatalatic(gwenn)\nforall x (Frizzy(x) -> Unreached(x))\nforall x (Catalatic(x) -> Frizzy(x))\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Chained(x))\nforall x (Chained(x) and Drippy(x) -> Frizzy(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) -> Then(x))\nColorful(vick) and Then(vick) -> Catalatic(vick)\nforall x (Catalatic(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Drippy(x) -> Chained(x))\n\nThen(gwenn)\n\nCatalatic(gwenn) and forall x (Catalatic(x) -> Frizzy(x)) -> therefore Frizzy(gwenn) Frizzy(gwenn) and forall x (Frizzy(x) -> Unreached(x)) -> therefore Unreached(gwenn) Unreached(gwenn) and forall x (Unreached(x) -> Then(x)) -> therefore Then(gwenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Rae is globose. Rae is unbarred. Rae is spiny. Rae is exempt. Giuseppe is brunette. Giuseppe is prolix. Giuseppe is exempt. If something is unbarred then it is globose. All exempt things are unbarred. Kind things are prolix. Nice, spiny things are unbarred. All globose things are nominative. If Rae is brunette and Rae is nominative then Rae is exempt. White things are brunette. All spiny things are prolix. Giuseppe is not nominative.", "logic": "\nGlobose(rae)\nUnbarred(rae)\nSpiny(rae)\nExempt(rae)\nBrunette(giuseppe)\nProlix(giuseppe)\nExempt(giuseppe)\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Globose(x))\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Prolix(x))\nforall x (Prolix(x) and Spiny(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Globose(x) -> Nominative(x))\nBrunette(rae) and Nominative(rae) -> Exempt(rae)\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Brunette(x))\nforall x (Spiny(x) -> Prolix(x))\n\nnot Nominative(giuseppe)\n\nExempt(giuseppe) and forall x (Exempt(x) -> Unbarred(x)) -> therefore Unbarred(giuseppe) Unbarred(giuseppe) and forall x (Unbarred(x) -> Globose(x)) -> therefore Globose(giuseppe) Globose(giuseppe) and forall x (Globose(x) -> Nominative(x)) -> therefore Nominative(giuseppe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Charmain is nephritic. Charmain is patronized. Garvin is patronized. Garvin is heard. Garvin is haploid. Garvin is attrited. Luise is patronized. Luise is pastel. Luise is attrited. Prunella is nephritic. Prunella is anarchical. Prunella is patronized. Prunella is pastel. Prunella is heard. Prunella is haploid. Prunella is attrited. Blue things are haploid. If Luise is patronized then Luise is pastel. If something is patronized then it is attrited. All attrited, pastel things are heard. If something is attrited and nephritic then it is pastel. If something is haploid then it is attrited. Charmain is nephritic.", "logic": "\nNephritic(charmain)\nPatronized(charmain)\nPatronized(garvin)\nHeard(garvin)\nHaploid(garvin)\nAttrited(garvin)\nPatronized(luise)\nPastel(luise)\nAttrited(luise)\nNephritic(prunella)\nAnarchical(prunella)\nPatronized(prunella)\nPastel(prunella)\nHeard(prunella)\nHaploid(prunella)\nAttrited(prunella)\nforall x (Nephritic(x) -> Haploid(x))\nPatronized(luise) -> Pastel(luise)\nforall x (Patronized(x) -> Attrited(x))\nforall x (Attrited(x) and Pastel(x) -> Heard(x))\nforall x (Attrited(x) and Nephritic(x) -> Pastel(x))\nforall x (Haploid(x) -> Attrited(x))\n\nNephritic(charmain)\n\ntherefore Nephritic(charmain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Shamus is banned. Shamus is unglazed. Garfinkel is unglazed. Garfinkel is ministrant. Garfinkel is reinforced. Garfinkel is dissolute. Maria is unglazed. Maria is confined. Maria is dissolute. Mitch is banned. Mitch is preanal. Mitch is unglazed. Mitch is confined. Mitch is ministrant. Mitch is reinforced. Mitch is dissolute. Blue things are reinforced. If Maria is unglazed then Maria is confined. If something is unglazed then it is dissolute. All dissolute, confined things are ministrant. If something is dissolute and banned then it is confined. If something is reinforced then it is dissolute. Mitch is not preanal.", "logic": "\nBanned(shamus)\nUnglazed(shamus)\nUnglazed(garfinkel)\nMinistrant(garfinkel)\nReinforced(garfinkel)\nDissolute(garfinkel)\nUnglazed(maria)\nConfined(maria)\nDissolute(maria)\nBanned(mitch)\nPreanal(mitch)\nUnglazed(mitch)\nConfined(mitch)\nMinistrant(mitch)\nReinforced(mitch)\nDissolute(mitch)\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nUnglazed(maria) -> Confined(maria)\nforall x (Unglazed(x) -> Dissolute(x))\nforall x (Dissolute(x) and Confined(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Dissolute(x) and Banned(x) -> Confined(x))\nforall x (Reinforced(x) -> Dissolute(x))\n\nnot Preanal(mitch)\n\ntherefore Preanal(mitch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Michele is ametropic. Michele is queasy. Rheba is queasy. Rheba is hick. Rheba is chelonian. Rheba is humpbacked. Bela is queasy. Bela is scandalous. Bela is humpbacked. Zachariah is ametropic. Zachariah is embodied. Zachariah is queasy. Zachariah is scandalous. Zachariah is hick. Zachariah is chelonian. Zachariah is humpbacked. Blue things are chelonian. If Bela is queasy then Bela is scandalous. If something is queasy then it is humpbacked. All humpbacked, scandalous things are hick. If something is humpbacked and ametropic then it is scandalous. If something is chelonian then it is humpbacked. Michele is chelonian.", "logic": "\nAmetropic(michele)\nQueasy(michele)\nQueasy(rheba)\nHick(rheba)\nChelonian(rheba)\nHumpbacked(rheba)\nQueasy(bela)\nScandalous(bela)\nHumpbacked(bela)\nAmetropic(zachariah)\nEmbodied(zachariah)\nQueasy(zachariah)\nScandalous(zachariah)\nHick(zachariah)\nChelonian(zachariah)\nHumpbacked(zachariah)\nforall x (Ametropic(x) -> Chelonian(x))\nQueasy(bela) -> Scandalous(bela)\nforall x (Queasy(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) and Scandalous(x) -> Hick(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) and Ametropic(x) -> Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\n\nChelonian(michele)\n\nAmetropic(michele) and forall x (Ametropic(x) -> Chelonian(x)) -> therefore Chelonian(michele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Kym is chalybeate. Kym is mechanized. Sonia is mechanized. Sonia is liquescent. Sonia is sinister. Sonia is hemic. Myke is mechanized. Myke is debasing. Myke is hemic. Charissa is chalybeate. Charissa is froward. Charissa is mechanized. Charissa is debasing. Charissa is liquescent. Charissa is sinister. Charissa is hemic. Blue things are sinister. If Myke is mechanized then Myke is debasing. If something is mechanized then it is hemic. All hemic, debasing things are liquescent. If something is hemic and chalybeate then it is debasing. If something is sinister then it is hemic. Kym is not sinister.", "logic": "\nChalybeate(kym)\nMechanized(kym)\nMechanized(sonia)\nLiquescent(sonia)\nSinister(sonia)\nHemic(sonia)\nMechanized(myke)\nDebasing(myke)\nHemic(myke)\nChalybeate(charissa)\nFroward(charissa)\nMechanized(charissa)\nDebasing(charissa)\nLiquescent(charissa)\nSinister(charissa)\nHemic(charissa)\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) -> Sinister(x))\nMechanized(myke) -> Debasing(myke)\nforall x (Mechanized(x) -> Hemic(x))\nforall x (Hemic(x) and Debasing(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Hemic(x) and Chalybeate(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Sinister(x) -> Hemic(x))\n\nnot Sinister(kym)\n\nChalybeate(kym) and forall x (Chalybeate(x) -> Sinister(x)) -> therefore Sinister(kym)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Emmye is segregated. Emmye is russet. Arlyn is russet. Arlyn is shortened. Arlyn is husky. Arlyn is paraguayan. Merline is russet. Merline is quits. Merline is paraguayan. Corinna is segregated. Corinna is nonaligned. Corinna is russet. Corinna is quits. Corinna is shortened. Corinna is husky. Corinna is paraguayan. Blue things are husky. If Merline is russet then Merline is quits. If something is russet then it is paraguayan. All paraguayan, quits things are shortened. If something is paraguayan and segregated then it is quits. If something is husky then it is paraguayan. Emmye is quits.", "logic": "\nSegregated(emmye)\nRusset(emmye)\nRusset(arlyn)\nShortened(arlyn)\nHusky(arlyn)\nParaguayan(arlyn)\nRusset(merline)\nQuits(merline)\nParaguayan(merline)\nSegregated(corinna)\nNonaligned(corinna)\nRusset(corinna)\nQuits(corinna)\nShortened(corinna)\nHusky(corinna)\nParaguayan(corinna)\nforall x (Segregated(x) -> Husky(x))\nRusset(merline) -> Quits(merline)\nforall x (Russet(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) and Quits(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) and Segregated(x) -> Quits(x))\nforall x (Husky(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\n\nQuits(emmye)\n\nRusset(emmye) and forall x (Russet(x) -> Paraguayan(x)) -> therefore Paraguayan(emmye) Paraguayan(emmye) and Segregated(emmye) and forall x (Paraguayan(x) and Segregated(x) -> Quits(x)) -> therefore Quits(emmye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Vivian is bantam. Vivian is knitted. Ursula is knitted. Ursula is unfailing. Ursula is outrageous. Ursula is weak. Ebonee is knitted. Ebonee is vagrant. Ebonee is weak. Gabbey is bantam. Gabbey is pondering. Gabbey is knitted. Gabbey is vagrant. Gabbey is unfailing. Gabbey is outrageous. Gabbey is weak. Blue things are outrageous. If Ebonee is knitted then Ebonee is vagrant. If something is knitted then it is weak. All weak, vagrant things are unfailing. If something is weak and bantam then it is vagrant. If something is outrageous then it is weak. Vivian is not vagrant.", "logic": "\nBantam(vivian)\nKnitted(vivian)\nKnitted(ursula)\nUnfailing(ursula)\nOutrageous(ursula)\nWeak(ursula)\nKnitted(ebonee)\nVagrant(ebonee)\nWeak(ebonee)\nBantam(gabbey)\nPondering(gabbey)\nKnitted(gabbey)\nVagrant(gabbey)\nUnfailing(gabbey)\nOutrageous(gabbey)\nWeak(gabbey)\nforall x (Bantam(x) -> Outrageous(x))\nKnitted(ebonee) -> Vagrant(ebonee)\nforall x (Knitted(x) -> Weak(x))\nforall x (Weak(x) and Vagrant(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nforall x (Weak(x) and Bantam(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Outrageous(x) -> Weak(x))\n\nnot Vagrant(vivian)\n\nKnitted(vivian) and forall x (Knitted(x) -> Weak(x)) -> therefore Weak(vivian) Weak(vivian) and Bantam(vivian) and forall x (Weak(x) and Bantam(x) -> Vagrant(x)) -> therefore Vagrant(vivian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Madelin is bunglesome. Madelin is manichaean. Ravi is manichaean. Ravi is satyrical. Ravi is chic. Ravi is unpainted. Randee is manichaean. Randee is smiling. Randee is unpainted. Murdock is bunglesome. Murdock is homozygous. Murdock is manichaean. Murdock is smiling. Murdock is satyrical. Murdock is chic. Murdock is unpainted. Blue things are chic. If Randee is manichaean then Randee is smiling. If something is manichaean then it is unpainted. All unpainted, smiling things are satyrical. If something is unpainted and bunglesome then it is smiling. If something is chic then it is unpainted. Madelin is satyrical.", "logic": "\nBunglesome(madelin)\nManichaean(madelin)\nManichaean(ravi)\nSatyrical(ravi)\nChic(ravi)\nUnpainted(ravi)\nManichaean(randee)\nSmiling(randee)\nUnpainted(randee)\nBunglesome(murdock)\nHomozygous(murdock)\nManichaean(murdock)\nSmiling(murdock)\nSatyrical(murdock)\nChic(murdock)\nUnpainted(murdock)\nforall x (Bunglesome(x) -> Chic(x))\nManichaean(randee) -> Smiling(randee)\nforall x (Manichaean(x) -> Unpainted(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Smiling(x) -> Satyrical(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Bunglesome(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Chic(x) -> Unpainted(x))\n\nSatyrical(madelin)\n\nManichaean(madelin) and forall x (Manichaean(x) -> Unpainted(x)) -> therefore Unpainted(madelin) Manichaean(madelin) and forall x (Manichaean(x) -> Unpainted(x)) -> therefore Unpainted(madelin) Unpainted(madelin) and Bunglesome(madelin) and forall x (Unpainted(x) and Bunglesome(x) -> Smiling(x)) -> therefore Smiling(madelin) Unpainted(madelin) and Smiling(madelin) and forall x (Unpainted(x) and Smiling(x) -> Satyrical(x)) -> therefore Satyrical(madelin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Cosetta is avestan. Cosetta is achromatic. Paulo is achromatic. Paulo is sorrel. Paulo is baculiform. Paulo is flamboyant. Davin is achromatic. Davin is next. Davin is flamboyant. Mathilda is avestan. Mathilda is unmade. Mathilda is achromatic. Mathilda is next. Mathilda is sorrel. Mathilda is baculiform. Mathilda is flamboyant. Blue things are baculiform. If Davin is achromatic then Davin is next. If something is achromatic then it is flamboyant. All flamboyant, next things are sorrel. If something is flamboyant and avestan then it is next. If something is baculiform then it is flamboyant. Cosetta is not sorrel.", "logic": "\nAvestan(cosetta)\nAchromatic(cosetta)\nAchromatic(paulo)\nSorrel(paulo)\nBaculiform(paulo)\nFlamboyant(paulo)\nAchromatic(davin)\nNext(davin)\nFlamboyant(davin)\nAvestan(mathilda)\nUnmade(mathilda)\nAchromatic(mathilda)\nNext(mathilda)\nSorrel(mathilda)\nBaculiform(mathilda)\nFlamboyant(mathilda)\nforall x (Avestan(x) -> Baculiform(x))\nAchromatic(davin) -> Next(davin)\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\nforall x (Flamboyant(x) and Next(x) -> Sorrel(x))\nforall x (Flamboyant(x) and Avestan(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Baculiform(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\n\nnot Sorrel(cosetta)\n\nAchromatic(cosetta) and forall x (Achromatic(x) -> Flamboyant(x)) -> therefore Flamboyant(cosetta) Achromatic(cosetta) and forall x (Achromatic(x) -> Flamboyant(x)) -> therefore Flamboyant(cosetta) Flamboyant(cosetta) and Avestan(cosetta) and forall x (Flamboyant(x) and Avestan(x) -> Next(x)) -> therefore Next(cosetta) Flamboyant(cosetta) and Next(cosetta) and forall x (Flamboyant(x) and Next(x) -> Sorrel(x)) -> therefore Sorrel(cosetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Gwyn is ideational. Gwyn is exanimate. Ray is exanimate. Ray is denotative. Ray is acquainted. Ray is unflavored. Filbert is exanimate. Filbert is miscible. Filbert is unflavored. Torrance is ideational. Torrance is raftered. Torrance is exanimate. Torrance is miscible. Torrance is denotative. Torrance is acquainted. Torrance is unflavored. Blue things are acquainted. If Filbert is exanimate then Filbert is miscible. If something is exanimate then it is unflavored. All unflavored, miscible things are denotative. If something is unflavored and ideational then it is miscible. If something is acquainted then it is unflavored. Filbert is not acquainted.", "logic": "\nIdeational(gwyn)\nExanimate(gwyn)\nExanimate(ray)\nDenotative(ray)\nAcquainted(ray)\nUnflavored(ray)\nExanimate(filbert)\nMiscible(filbert)\nUnflavored(filbert)\nIdeational(torrance)\nRaftered(torrance)\nExanimate(torrance)\nMiscible(torrance)\nDenotative(torrance)\nAcquainted(torrance)\nUnflavored(torrance)\nforall x (Ideational(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nExanimate(filbert) -> Miscible(filbert)\nforall x (Exanimate(x) -> Unflavored(x))\nforall x (Unflavored(x) and Miscible(x) -> Denotative(x))\nforall x (Unflavored(x) and Ideational(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> Unflavored(x))\n\nnot Acquainted(filbert)\n\nforall x (Ideational(x) -> Acquainted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Ervin is holozoic. Ervin is octangular. Jeni is octangular. Jeni is abstracted. Jeni is cognisable. Jeni is unalike. Joachim is octangular. Joachim is standby. Joachim is unalike. Dorothy is holozoic. Dorothy is expositive. Dorothy is octangular. Dorothy is standby. Dorothy is abstracted. Dorothy is cognisable. Dorothy is unalike. Blue things are cognisable. If Joachim is octangular then Joachim is standby. If something is octangular then it is unalike. All unalike, standby things are abstracted. If something is unalike and holozoic then it is standby. If something is cognisable then it is unalike. Jeni is standby.", "logic": "\nHolozoic(ervin)\nOctangular(ervin)\nOctangular(jeni)\nAbstracted(jeni)\nCognisable(jeni)\nUnalike(jeni)\nOctangular(joachim)\nStandby(joachim)\nUnalike(joachim)\nHolozoic(dorothy)\nExpositive(dorothy)\nOctangular(dorothy)\nStandby(dorothy)\nAbstracted(dorothy)\nCognisable(dorothy)\nUnalike(dorothy)\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Cognisable(x))\nOctangular(joachim) -> Standby(joachim)\nforall x (Octangular(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Unalike(x) and Standby(x) -> Abstracted(x))\nforall x (Unalike(x) and Holozoic(x) -> Standby(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) -> Unalike(x))\n\nStandby(jeni)\n\nforall x (Unalike(x) and Holozoic(x) -> Standby(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Lanie is pure. Lanie is soiled. Roseanna is soiled. Roseanna is hardback. Roseanna is melanesian. Roseanna is paradisiac. Leanna is soiled. Leanna is endowed. Leanna is paradisiac. Davita is pure. Davita is axenic. Davita is soiled. Davita is endowed. Davita is hardback. Davita is melanesian. Davita is paradisiac. Blue things are melanesian. If Leanna is soiled then Leanna is endowed. If something is soiled then it is paradisiac. All paradisiac, endowed things are hardback. If something is paradisiac and pure then it is endowed. If something is melanesian then it is paradisiac. Leanna is not pure.", "logic": "\nPure(lanie)\nSoiled(lanie)\nSoiled(roseanna)\nHardback(roseanna)\nMelanesian(roseanna)\nParadisiac(roseanna)\nSoiled(leanna)\nEndowed(leanna)\nParadisiac(leanna)\nPure(davita)\nAxenic(davita)\nSoiled(davita)\nEndowed(davita)\nHardback(davita)\nMelanesian(davita)\nParadisiac(davita)\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Melanesian(x))\nSoiled(leanna) -> Endowed(leanna)\nforall x (Soiled(x) -> Paradisiac(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) and Endowed(x) -> Hardback(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) and Pure(x) -> Endowed(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) -> Paradisiac(x))\n\nnot Pure(leanna)\n\nnot Pure(leanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Caressa is stertorous. Caressa is unsold. Cicily is unsold. Cicily is masterful. Cicily is dyspeptic. Cicily is cloudy. Remington is unsold. Remington is surgical. Remington is cloudy. Cinda is stertorous. Cinda is pectineal. Cinda is unsold. Cinda is surgical. Cinda is masterful. Cinda is dyspeptic. Cinda is cloudy. Blue things are dyspeptic. If Remington is unsold then Remington is surgical. If something is unsold then it is cloudy. All cloudy, surgical things are masterful. If something is cloudy and stertorous then it is surgical. If something is dyspeptic then it is cloudy. Cicily is stertorous.", "logic": "\nStertorous(caressa)\nUnsold(caressa)\nUnsold(cicily)\nMasterful(cicily)\nDyspeptic(cicily)\nCloudy(cicily)\nUnsold(remington)\nSurgical(remington)\nCloudy(remington)\nStertorous(cinda)\nPectineal(cinda)\nUnsold(cinda)\nSurgical(cinda)\nMasterful(cinda)\nDyspeptic(cinda)\nCloudy(cinda)\nforall x (Stertorous(x) -> Dyspeptic(x))\nUnsold(remington) -> Surgical(remington)\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Cloudy(x) and Surgical(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Cloudy(x) and Stertorous(x) -> Surgical(x))\nforall x (Dyspeptic(x) -> Cloudy(x))\n\nStertorous(cicily)\n\nStertorous(cicily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Deni is grizzly. Deni is theoretic. Marcel is theoretic. Marcel is ideational. Marcel is noble. Marcel is capitular. Binny is theoretic. Binny is hermitic. Binny is capitular. Janet is grizzly. Janet is valved. Janet is theoretic. Janet is hermitic. Janet is ideational. Janet is noble. Janet is capitular. Blue things are noble. If Binny is theoretic then Binny is hermitic. If something is theoretic then it is capitular. All capitular, hermitic things are ideational. If something is capitular and grizzly then it is hermitic. If something is noble then it is capitular. Marcel is not valved.", "logic": "\nGrizzly(deni)\nTheoretic(deni)\nTheoretic(marcel)\nIdeational(marcel)\nNoble(marcel)\nCapitular(marcel)\nTheoretic(binny)\nHermitic(binny)\nCapitular(binny)\nGrizzly(janet)\nValved(janet)\nTheoretic(janet)\nHermitic(janet)\nIdeational(janet)\nNoble(janet)\nCapitular(janet)\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> Noble(x))\nTheoretic(binny) -> Hermitic(binny)\nforall x (Theoretic(x) -> Capitular(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) and Hermitic(x) -> Ideational(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) and Grizzly(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Capitular(x))\n\nnot Valved(marcel)\n\nnot Valved(marcel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Barnard is coarctate. Barnard is unpainful. Miguel is unpainful. Miguel is canonical. Miguel is dowered. Miguel is sceptical. Forest is unpainful. Forest is gastric. Forest is sceptical. Charmaine is coarctate. Charmaine is cartesian. Charmaine is unpainful. Charmaine is gastric. Charmaine is canonical. Charmaine is dowered. Charmaine is sceptical. Blue things are dowered. If Forest is unpainful then Forest is gastric. If something is unpainful then it is sceptical. All sceptical, gastric things are canonical. If something is sceptical and coarctate then it is gastric. If something is dowered then it is sceptical. Forest is cartesian.", "logic": "\nCoarctate(barnard)\nUnpainful(barnard)\nUnpainful(miguel)\nCanonical(miguel)\nDowered(miguel)\nSceptical(miguel)\nUnpainful(forest)\nGastric(forest)\nSceptical(forest)\nCoarctate(charmaine)\nCartesian(charmaine)\nUnpainful(charmaine)\nGastric(charmaine)\nCanonical(charmaine)\nDowered(charmaine)\nSceptical(charmaine)\nforall x (Coarctate(x) -> Dowered(x))\nUnpainful(forest) -> Gastric(forest)\nforall x (Unpainful(x) -> Sceptical(x))\nforall x (Sceptical(x) and Gastric(x) -> Canonical(x))\nforall x (Sceptical(x) and Coarctate(x) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Sceptical(x))\n\nCartesian(forest)\n\nCartesian(forest) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "The obie is sunset. The sisile is antepartum. The beckie well the obie. If someone is sunset then they need the sisile. If someone well the obie then they chase the obie. If someone typify the sisile and the sisile is antepartum then the sisile is sunset. The sisile is antepartum.", "logic": "\nSunset(obie)\nAntepartum(sisile)\nWell(beckie, obie)\nforall x (Sunset(x) -> Typify(x, sisile))\nforall x (Well(x, obie) -> Preform(x, obie))\nforall x (Typify(x, sisile) and Antepartum(sisile) -> Sunset(sisile))\n\nAntepartum(sisile)\n\ntherefore Antepartum(sisile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The juan is mauve. The suzie is involute. The abdul eliminate the juan. If someone is mauve then they need the suzie. If someone eliminate the juan then they chase the juan. If someone action the suzie and the suzie is involute then the suzie is mauve. The suzie is not involute.", "logic": "\nMauve(juan)\nInvolute(suzie)\nEliminate(abdul, juan)\nforall x (Mauve(x) -> Action(x, suzie))\nforall x (Eliminate(x, juan) -> Tinker(x, juan))\nforall x (Action(x, suzie) and Involute(suzie) -> Mauve(suzie))\n\nnot Involute(suzie)\n\ntherefore Involute(suzie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The koralle is melodic. The nerte is pejorative. The maribelle rumour the koralle. If someone is melodic then they need the nerte. If someone rumour the koralle then they chase the koralle. If someone reinvent the nerte and the nerte is pejorative then the nerte is melodic. The koralle reinvent the nerte.", "logic": "\nMelodic(koralle)\nPejorative(nerte)\nRumour(maribelle, koralle)\nforall x (Melodic(x) -> Reinvent(x, nerte))\nforall x (Rumour(x, koralle) -> Sodomize(x, koralle))\nforall x (Reinvent(x, nerte) and Pejorative(nerte) -> Melodic(nerte))\n\nReinvent(koralle, nerte)\n\nMelodic(koralle) and forall x (Melodic(x) -> Reinvent(x, nerte)) -> therefore Reinvent(koralle, nerte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The moria is stockinged. The chandler is phonemic. The eli privatise the moria. If someone is stockinged then they need the chandler. If someone privatise the moria then they chase the moria. If someone police the chandler and the chandler is phonemic then the chandler is stockinged. The moria does not need the chandler.", "logic": "\nStockinged(moria)\nPhonemic(chandler)\nPrivatise(eli, moria)\nforall x (Stockinged(x) -> Police(x, chandler))\nforall x (Privatise(x, moria) -> Craze(x, moria))\nforall x (Police(x, chandler) and Phonemic(chandler) -> Stockinged(chandler))\n\nnot Police(moria, chandler)\n\nStockinged(moria) and forall x (Stockinged(x) -> Police(x, chandler)) -> therefore Police(moria, chandler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The ferdy is crucial. The fan is repulsive. The harris vulgarize the ferdy. If someone is crucial then they need the fan. If someone vulgarize the ferdy then they chase the ferdy. If someone precook the fan and the fan is repulsive then the fan is crucial. The fan is crucial.", "logic": "\nCrucial(ferdy)\nRepulsive(fan)\nVulgarize(harris, ferdy)\nforall x (Crucial(x) -> Precook(x, fan))\nforall x (Vulgarize(x, ferdy) -> Resinate(x, ferdy))\nforall x (Precook(x, fan) and Repulsive(fan) -> Crucial(fan))\n\nCrucial(fan)\n\nCrucial(ferdy) and forall x (Crucial(x) -> Precook(x, fan)) -> therefore Precook(ferdy, fan) Precook(ferdy, fan) and Repulsive(fan) and forall x (Precook(x, fan) and Repulsive(fan) -> Crucial(fan)) -> therefore Crucial(fan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The dore is diminuendo. The tudor is cattish. The aurie snorkel the dore. If someone is diminuendo then they need the tudor. If someone snorkel the dore then they chase the dore. If someone lexicalize the tudor and the tudor is cattish then the tudor is diminuendo. The tudor is not diminuendo.", "logic": "\nDiminuendo(dore)\nCattish(tudor)\nSnorkel(aurie, dore)\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Lexicalize(x, tudor))\nforall x (Snorkel(x, dore) -> Allow(x, dore))\nforall x (Lexicalize(x, tudor) and Cattish(tudor) -> Diminuendo(tudor))\n\nnot Diminuendo(tudor)\n\nDiminuendo(dore) and forall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Lexicalize(x, tudor)) -> therefore Lexicalize(dore, tudor) Lexicalize(dore, tudor) and Cattish(tudor) and forall x (Lexicalize(x, tudor) and Cattish(tudor) -> Diminuendo(tudor)) -> therefore Diminuendo(tudor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The catherina is tasty. The rozina is daft. The vaclav botanize the catherina. If someone is tasty then they need the rozina. If someone botanize the catherina then they chase the catherina. If someone precook the rozina and the rozina is daft then the rozina is tasty. The rozina precook the rozina.", "logic": "\nTasty(catherina)\nDaft(rozina)\nBotanize(vaclav, catherina)\nforall x (Tasty(x) -> Precook(x, rozina))\nforall x (Botanize(x, catherina) -> Round(x, catherina))\nforall x (Precook(x, rozina) and Daft(rozina) -> Tasty(rozina))\n\nPrecook(rozina, rozina)\n\nTasty(catherina) and forall x (Tasty(x) -> Precook(x, rozina)) -> therefore Precook(catherina, rozina) Precook(catherina, rozina) and Daft(rozina) and forall x (Precook(x, rozina) and Daft(rozina) -> Tasty(rozina)) -> therefore Tasty(rozina) Tasty(rozina) and forall x (Tasty(x) -> Precook(x, rozina)) -> therefore Precook(rozina, rozina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The rosetta is demeaning. The cyril is public. The brinkley cybernate the rosetta. If someone is demeaning then they need the cyril. If someone cybernate the rosetta then they chase the rosetta. If someone daze the cyril and the cyril is public then the cyril is demeaning. The cyril does not need the cyril.", "logic": "\nDemeaning(rosetta)\nPublic(cyril)\nCybernate(brinkley, rosetta)\nforall x (Demeaning(x) -> Daze(x, cyril))\nforall x (Cybernate(x, rosetta) -> Retread(x, rosetta))\nforall x (Daze(x, cyril) and Public(cyril) -> Demeaning(cyril))\n\nnot Daze(cyril, cyril)\n\nDemeaning(rosetta) and forall x (Demeaning(x) -> Daze(x, cyril)) -> therefore Daze(rosetta, cyril) Daze(rosetta, cyril) and Public(cyril) and forall x (Daze(x, cyril) and Public(cyril) -> Demeaning(cyril)) -> therefore Demeaning(cyril) Demeaning(cyril) and forall x (Demeaning(x) -> Daze(x, cyril)) -> therefore Daze(cyril, cyril)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The juline is base. The terry is bellying. The carsten disappoint the juline. If someone is base then they need the terry. If someone disappoint the juline then they chase the juline. If someone curry the terry and the terry is bellying then the terry is base. The juline does not chase the juline.", "logic": "\nBase(juline)\nBellying(terry)\nDisappoint(carsten, juline)\nforall x (Base(x) -> Curry(x, terry))\nforall x (Disappoint(x, juline) -> Ramify(x, juline))\nforall x (Curry(x, terry) and Bellying(terry) -> Base(terry))\n\nnot Ramify(juline, juline)\n\nforall x (Disappoint(x, juline) -> Ramify(x, juline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The hamil is inarguable. The dustin is dried. The estell dinge the hamil. If someone is inarguable then they need the dustin. If someone dinge the hamil then they chase the hamil. If someone whomp the dustin and the dustin is dried then the dustin is inarguable. The estell whomp the dustin.", "logic": "\nInarguable(hamil)\nDried(dustin)\nDinge(estell, hamil)\nforall x (Inarguable(x) -> Whomp(x, dustin))\nforall x (Dinge(x, hamil) -> Meliorate(x, hamil))\nforall x (Whomp(x, dustin) and Dried(dustin) -> Inarguable(dustin))\n\nWhomp(estell, dustin)\n\nforall x (Inarguable(x) -> Whomp(x, dustin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The ranice is magnetized. The bary is zealous. The tomkin swaddle the ranice. If someone is magnetized then they need the bary. If someone swaddle the ranice then they chase the ranice. If someone entangle the bary and the bary is zealous then the bary is magnetized. The bary does not chase the ranice.", "logic": "\nMagnetized(ranice)\nZealous(bary)\nSwaddle(tomkin, ranice)\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Entangle(x, bary))\nforall x (Swaddle(x, ranice) -> Spawn(x, ranice))\nforall x (Entangle(x, bary) and Zealous(bary) -> Magnetized(bary))\n\nnot Spawn(bary, ranice)\n\nforall x (Swaddle(x, ranice) -> Spawn(x, ranice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The maia is draining. The ailee is semihard. The jojo lumber the maia. If someone is draining then they need the ailee. If someone lumber the maia then they chase the maia. If someone fart the ailee and the ailee is semihard then the ailee is draining. The ailee is cold.", "logic": "\nDraining(maia)\nSemihard(ailee)\nLumber(jojo, maia)\nforall x (Draining(x) -> Fart(x, ailee))\nforall x (Lumber(x, maia) -> Shorten(x, maia))\nforall x (Fart(x, ailee) and Semihard(ailee) -> Draining(ailee))\n\nCold(ailee)\n\nCold(ailee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The vito is rheologic. The mairead is anhydrous. The hildy foreswear the vito. If someone is rheologic then they need the mairead. If someone foreswear the vito then they chase the vito. If someone medicate the mairead and the mairead is anhydrous then the mairead is rheologic. The vito does not like the hildy.", "logic": "\nRheologic(vito)\nAnhydrous(mairead)\nForeswear(hildy, vito)\nforall x (Rheologic(x) -> Medicate(x, mairead))\nforall x (Foreswear(x, vito) -> Motorise(x, vito))\nforall x (Medicate(x, mairead) and Anhydrous(mairead) -> Rheologic(mairead))\n\nnot Foreswear(vito, hildy)\n\nnot Foreswear(vito, hildy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The ashleigh is imitative. The hanna is pyemic. The connie cerebrate the ashleigh. If someone is imitative then they need the hanna. If someone cerebrate the ashleigh then they chase the ashleigh. If someone yacht the hanna and the hanna is pyemic then the hanna is imitative. The connie is blue.", "logic": "\nImitative(ashleigh)\nPyemic(hanna)\nCerebrate(connie, ashleigh)\nforall x (Imitative(x) -> Yacht(x, hanna))\nforall x (Cerebrate(x, ashleigh) -> Anglicise(x, ashleigh))\nforall x (Yacht(x, hanna) and Pyemic(hanna) -> Imitative(hanna))\n\nBlue(connie)\n\nBlue(connie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The morgen is surgical. The benedict is wasted. The emanuela elbow the morgen. If someone is surgical then they need the benedict. If someone elbow the morgen then they chase the morgen. If someone infringe the benedict and the benedict is wasted then the benedict is surgical. The benedict is not kind.", "logic": "\nSurgical(morgen)\nWasted(benedict)\nElbow(emanuela, morgen)\nforall x (Surgical(x) -> Infringe(x, benedict))\nforall x (Elbow(x, morgen) -> Caponize(x, morgen))\nforall x (Infringe(x, benedict) and Wasted(benedict) -> Surgical(benedict))\n\nnot Kind(benedict)\n\nnot Kind(benedict) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The carolyne is impotent. The fifi is respectful. The aretha probate the carolyne. If someone is impotent then they need the fifi. If someone probate the carolyne then they chase the carolyne. If someone persuade the fifi and the fifi is respectful then the fifi is impotent. The carolyne wiretap the aretha.", "logic": "\nImpotent(carolyne)\nRespectful(fifi)\nProbate(aretha, carolyne)\nforall x (Impotent(x) -> Persuade(x, fifi))\nforall x (Probate(x, carolyne) -> Wiretap(x, carolyne))\nforall x (Persuade(x, fifi) and Respectful(fifi) -> Impotent(fifi))\n\nWiretap(carolyne, aretha)\n\nWiretap(carolyne, aretha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "Merl is diocesan. Merl is calm. Merl is gimbaled. Charlton is downstairs. Charlton is diocesan. Charlton is ashamed. Charlton is calm. Charlton is gimbaled. Charlton is worn. Charlton is winking. If Merl is calm and Merl is ashamed then Merl is winking. If someone is ashamed then they are calm. Smart people are ashamed. If someone is gimbaled then they are worn. All winking, downstairs people are gimbaled. If Charlton is gimbaled then Charlton is worn. Charlton is gimbaled.", "logic": "\nDiocesan(merl)\nCalm(merl)\nGimbaled(merl)\nDownstairs(charlton)\nDiocesan(charlton)\nAshamed(charlton)\nCalm(charlton)\nGimbaled(charlton)\nWorn(charlton)\nWinking(charlton)\nCalm(merl) and Ashamed(merl) -> Winking(merl)\nforall x (Ashamed(x) -> Calm(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Ashamed(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Winking(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nGimbaled(charlton) -> Worn(charlton)\n\nGimbaled(charlton)\n\ntherefore Gimbaled(charlton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Ian is cuddlesome. Ian is skinnerian. Ian is austrian. Edwin is touchy. Edwin is cuddlesome. Edwin is seething. Edwin is skinnerian. Edwin is austrian. Edwin is sagging. Edwin is roundabout. If Ian is skinnerian and Ian is seething then Ian is roundabout. If someone is seething then they are skinnerian. Smart people are seething. If someone is austrian then they are sagging. All roundabout, touchy people are austrian. If Edwin is austrian then Edwin is sagging. Ian is not skinnerian.", "logic": "\nCuddlesome(ian)\nSkinnerian(ian)\nAustrian(ian)\nTouchy(edwin)\nCuddlesome(edwin)\nSeething(edwin)\nSkinnerian(edwin)\nAustrian(edwin)\nSagging(edwin)\nRoundabout(edwin)\nSkinnerian(ian) and Seething(ian) -> Roundabout(ian)\nforall x (Seething(x) -> Skinnerian(x))\nforall x (Sagging(x) -> Seething(x))\nforall x (Austrian(x) -> Sagging(x))\nforall x (Roundabout(x) and Touchy(x) -> Austrian(x))\nAustrian(edwin) -> Sagging(edwin)\n\nnot Skinnerian(ian)\n\ntherefore Skinnerian(ian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Livia is barbadian. Livia is blushing. Livia is apiarian. Leonie is chorionic. Leonie is barbadian. Leonie is blasting. Leonie is blushing. Leonie is apiarian. Leonie is flushed. Leonie is referent. If Livia is blushing and Livia is blasting then Livia is referent. If someone is blasting then they are blushing. Smart people are blasting. If someone is apiarian then they are flushed. All referent, chorionic people are apiarian. If Leonie is apiarian then Leonie is flushed. Livia is flushed.", "logic": "\nBarbadian(livia)\nBlushing(livia)\nApiarian(livia)\nChorionic(leonie)\nBarbadian(leonie)\nBlasting(leonie)\nBlushing(leonie)\nApiarian(leonie)\nFlushed(leonie)\nReferent(leonie)\nBlushing(livia) and Blasting(livia) -> Referent(livia)\nforall x (Blasting(x) -> Blushing(x))\nforall x (Flushed(x) -> Blasting(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) -> Flushed(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) and Chorionic(x) -> Apiarian(x))\nApiarian(leonie) -> Flushed(leonie)\n\nFlushed(livia)\n\nApiarian(livia) and forall x (Apiarian(x) -> Flushed(x)) -> therefore Flushed(livia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Cherlyn is sporadic. Cherlyn is jerking. Cherlyn is farsighted. Mechelle is anoxemic. Mechelle is sporadic. Mechelle is soignee. Mechelle is jerking. Mechelle is farsighted. Mechelle is rhetorical. Mechelle is topical. If Cherlyn is jerking and Cherlyn is soignee then Cherlyn is topical. If someone is soignee then they are jerking. Smart people are soignee. If someone is farsighted then they are rhetorical. All topical, anoxemic people are farsighted. If Mechelle is farsighted then Mechelle is rhetorical. Cherlyn is not rhetorical.", "logic": "\nSporadic(cherlyn)\nJerking(cherlyn)\nFarsighted(cherlyn)\nAnoxemic(mechelle)\nSporadic(mechelle)\nSoignee(mechelle)\nJerking(mechelle)\nFarsighted(mechelle)\nRhetorical(mechelle)\nTopical(mechelle)\nJerking(cherlyn) and Soignee(cherlyn) -> Topical(cherlyn)\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Jerking(x))\nforall x (Rhetorical(x) -> Soignee(x))\nforall x (Farsighted(x) -> Rhetorical(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) and Anoxemic(x) -> Farsighted(x))\nFarsighted(mechelle) -> Rhetorical(mechelle)\n\nnot Rhetorical(cherlyn)\n\nFarsighted(cherlyn) and forall x (Farsighted(x) -> Rhetorical(x)) -> therefore Rhetorical(cherlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Nariko is torrential. Nariko is squab. Nariko is fussy. Aguinaldo is speedy. Aguinaldo is torrential. Aguinaldo is canonized. Aguinaldo is squab. Aguinaldo is fussy. Aguinaldo is glinting. Aguinaldo is crusty. If Nariko is squab and Nariko is canonized then Nariko is crusty. If someone is canonized then they are squab. Smart people are canonized. If someone is fussy then they are glinting. All crusty, speedy people are fussy. If Aguinaldo is fussy then Aguinaldo is glinting. Nariko is canonized.", "logic": "\nTorrential(nariko)\nSquab(nariko)\nFussy(nariko)\nSpeedy(aguinaldo)\nTorrential(aguinaldo)\nCanonized(aguinaldo)\nSquab(aguinaldo)\nFussy(aguinaldo)\nGlinting(aguinaldo)\nCrusty(aguinaldo)\nSquab(nariko) and Canonized(nariko) -> Crusty(nariko)\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Glinting(x) -> Canonized(x))\nforall x (Fussy(x) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Crusty(x) and Speedy(x) -> Fussy(x))\nFussy(aguinaldo) -> Glinting(aguinaldo)\n\nCanonized(nariko)\n\nFussy(nariko) and forall x (Fussy(x) -> Glinting(x)) -> therefore Glinting(nariko) Glinting(nariko) and forall x (Glinting(x) -> Canonized(x)) -> therefore Canonized(nariko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Jermayne is strategic. Jermayne is airy. Jermayne is general. Hailey is graven. Hailey is strategic. Hailey is chopped. Hailey is airy. Hailey is general. Hailey is burnt. Hailey is prankish. If Jermayne is airy and Jermayne is chopped then Jermayne is prankish. If someone is chopped then they are airy. Smart people are chopped. If someone is general then they are burnt. All prankish, graven people are general. If Hailey is general then Hailey is burnt. Jermayne is not chopped.", "logic": "\nStrategic(jermayne)\nAiry(jermayne)\nGeneral(jermayne)\nGraven(hailey)\nStrategic(hailey)\nChopped(hailey)\nAiry(hailey)\nGeneral(hailey)\nBurnt(hailey)\nPrankish(hailey)\nAiry(jermayne) and Chopped(jermayne) -> Prankish(jermayne)\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Airy(x))\nforall x (Burnt(x) -> Chopped(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Burnt(x))\nforall x (Prankish(x) and Graven(x) -> General(x))\nGeneral(hailey) -> Burnt(hailey)\n\nnot Chopped(jermayne)\n\nGeneral(jermayne) and forall x (General(x) -> Burnt(x)) -> therefore Burnt(jermayne) Burnt(jermayne) and forall x (Burnt(x) -> Chopped(x)) -> therefore Chopped(jermayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Omar is unsociable. Omar is maddening. Omar is juxtaposed. Minny is perishable. Minny is unsociable. Minny is venezuelan. Minny is maddening. Minny is juxtaposed. Minny is liable. Minny is pomaded. If Omar is maddening and Omar is venezuelan then Omar is pomaded. If someone is venezuelan then they are maddening. Smart people are venezuelan. If someone is juxtaposed then they are liable. All pomaded, perishable people are juxtaposed. If Minny is juxtaposed then Minny is liable. Omar is pomaded.", "logic": "\nUnsociable(omar)\nMaddening(omar)\nJuxtaposed(omar)\nPerishable(minny)\nUnsociable(minny)\nVenezuelan(minny)\nMaddening(minny)\nJuxtaposed(minny)\nLiable(minny)\nPomaded(minny)\nMaddening(omar) and Venezuelan(omar) -> Pomaded(omar)\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) -> Maddening(x))\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Venezuelan(x))\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) and Perishable(x) -> Juxtaposed(x))\nJuxtaposed(minny) -> Liable(minny)\n\nPomaded(omar)\n\nJuxtaposed(omar) and forall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Liable(x)) -> therefore Liable(omar) Liable(omar) and forall x (Liable(x) -> Venezuelan(x)) -> therefore Venezuelan(omar) Maddening(omar) and Venezuelan(omar) and Maddening(omar) and Venezuelan(omar) -> Pomaded(omar) -> therefore Pomaded(omar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Lester is tortuous. Lester is deserved. Lester is naif. Dominic is anabolic. Dominic is tortuous. Dominic is cypriot. Dominic is deserved. Dominic is naif. Dominic is nefarious. Dominic is chylific. If Lester is deserved and Lester is cypriot then Lester is chylific. If someone is cypriot then they are deserved. Smart people are cypriot. If someone is naif then they are nefarious. All chylific, anabolic people are naif. If Dominic is naif then Dominic is nefarious. Lester is not chylific.", "logic": "\nTortuous(lester)\nDeserved(lester)\nNaif(lester)\nAnabolic(dominic)\nTortuous(dominic)\nCypriot(dominic)\nDeserved(dominic)\nNaif(dominic)\nNefarious(dominic)\nChylific(dominic)\nDeserved(lester) and Cypriot(lester) -> Chylific(lester)\nforall x (Cypriot(x) -> Deserved(x))\nforall x (Nefarious(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nforall x (Naif(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nforall x (Chylific(x) and Anabolic(x) -> Naif(x))\nNaif(dominic) -> Nefarious(dominic)\n\nnot Chylific(lester)\n\nNaif(lester) and forall x (Naif(x) -> Nefarious(x)) -> therefore Nefarious(lester) Nefarious(lester) and forall x (Nefarious(x) -> Cypriot(x)) -> therefore Cypriot(lester) Deserved(lester) and Cypriot(lester) and Deserved(lester) and Cypriot(lester) -> Chylific(lester) -> therefore Chylific(lester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Ransom is propitious. Ransom is cussed. Ransom is anagogic. All squab, paid things are propitious. All pituitary things are cussed. If Ransom is pituitary then Ransom is paid. Young, paid things are squab. All cussed things are paid. If Ransom is squab and Ransom is propitious then Ransom is sanctioned. Ransom is anagogic.", "logic": "\nPropitious(ransom)\nCussed(ransom)\nAnagogic(ransom)\nforall x (Squab(x) and Paid(x) -> Propitious(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) -> Cussed(x))\nPituitary(ransom) -> Paid(ransom)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Paid(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Cussed(x) -> Paid(x))\nSquab(ransom) and Propitious(ransom) -> Sanctioned(ransom)\n\nAnagogic(ransom)\n\ntherefore Anagogic(ransom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Vania is woven. Vania is treacly. Vania is owned. All spousal, rewarding things are woven. All burned things are treacly. If Vania is burned then Vania is rewarding. Young, rewarding things are spousal. All treacly things are rewarding. If Vania is spousal and Vania is woven then Vania is shockable. Vania is not owned.", "logic": "\nWoven(vania)\nTreacly(vania)\nOwned(vania)\nforall x (Spousal(x) and Rewarding(x) -> Woven(x))\nforall x (Burned(x) -> Treacly(x))\nBurned(vania) -> Rewarding(vania)\nforall x (Owned(x) and Rewarding(x) -> Spousal(x))\nforall x (Treacly(x) -> Rewarding(x))\nSpousal(vania) and Woven(vania) -> Shockable(vania)\n\nnot Owned(vania)\n\ntherefore Owned(vania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Dotty is missional. Dotty is picky. Dotty is seasonal. All salverform, shimmery things are missional. All piano things are picky. If Dotty is piano then Dotty is shimmery. Young, shimmery things are salverform. All picky things are shimmery. If Dotty is salverform and Dotty is missional then Dotty is unvented. Dotty is shimmery.", "logic": "\nMissional(dotty)\nPicky(dotty)\nSeasonal(dotty)\nforall x (Salverform(x) and Shimmery(x) -> Missional(x))\nforall x (Piano(x) -> Picky(x))\nPiano(dotty) -> Shimmery(dotty)\nforall x (Seasonal(x) and Shimmery(x) -> Salverform(x))\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nSalverform(dotty) and Missional(dotty) -> Unvented(dotty)\n\nShimmery(dotty)\n\nPicky(dotty) and forall x (Picky(x) -> Shimmery(x)) -> therefore Shimmery(dotty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Helaina is tepid. Helaina is jocose. Helaina is prolusory. All meaningful, vibratory things are tepid. All spic things are jocose. If Helaina is spic then Helaina is vibratory. Young, vibratory things are meaningful. All jocose things are vibratory. If Helaina is meaningful and Helaina is tepid then Helaina is stunning. Helaina is not vibratory.", "logic": "\nTepid(helaina)\nJocose(helaina)\nProlusory(helaina)\nforall x (Meaningful(x) and Vibratory(x) -> Tepid(x))\nforall x (Spic(x) -> Jocose(x))\nSpic(helaina) -> Vibratory(helaina)\nforall x (Prolusory(x) and Vibratory(x) -> Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Vibratory(x))\nMeaningful(helaina) and Tepid(helaina) -> Stunning(helaina)\n\nnot Vibratory(helaina)\n\nJocose(helaina) and forall x (Jocose(x) -> Vibratory(x)) -> therefore Vibratory(helaina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Tanney is effected. Tanney is lincolnian. Tanney is approved. All salacious, gladdened things are effected. All albinal things are lincolnian. If Tanney is albinal then Tanney is gladdened. Young, gladdened things are salacious. All lincolnian things are gladdened. If Tanney is salacious and Tanney is effected then Tanney is allegro. Tanney is salacious.", "logic": "\nEffected(tanney)\nLincolnian(tanney)\nApproved(tanney)\nforall x (Salacious(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Effected(x))\nforall x (Albinal(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nAlbinal(tanney) -> Gladdened(tanney)\nforall x (Approved(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Salacious(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Gladdened(x))\nSalacious(tanney) and Effected(tanney) -> Allegro(tanney)\n\nSalacious(tanney)\n\nLincolnian(tanney) and forall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Gladdened(x)) -> therefore Gladdened(tanney) Approved(tanney) and Gladdened(tanney) and forall x (Approved(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Salacious(x)) -> therefore Salacious(tanney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Clancy is humanistic. Clancy is civilised. Clancy is cartesian. All carnation, nonviable things are humanistic. All yeasty things are civilised. If Clancy is yeasty then Clancy is nonviable. Young, nonviable things are carnation. All civilised things are nonviable. If Clancy is carnation and Clancy is humanistic then Clancy is unsoured. Clancy is not carnation.", "logic": "\nHumanistic(clancy)\nCivilised(clancy)\nCartesian(clancy)\nforall x (Carnation(x) and Nonviable(x) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Civilised(x))\nYeasty(clancy) -> Nonviable(clancy)\nforall x (Cartesian(x) and Nonviable(x) -> Carnation(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Nonviable(x))\nCarnation(clancy) and Humanistic(clancy) -> Unsoured(clancy)\n\nnot Carnation(clancy)\n\nCivilised(clancy) and forall x (Civilised(x) -> Nonviable(x)) -> therefore Nonviable(clancy) Cartesian(clancy) and Nonviable(clancy) and forall x (Cartesian(x) and Nonviable(x) -> Carnation(x)) -> therefore Carnation(clancy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Corwin is abysmal. Corwin is dummy. Corwin is submersed. All dioecious, steroidal things are abysmal. All nigh things are dummy. If Corwin is nigh then Corwin is steroidal. Young, steroidal things are dioecious. All dummy things are steroidal. If Corwin is dioecious and Corwin is abysmal then Corwin is scattered. Corwin is scattered.", "logic": "\nAbysmal(corwin)\nDummy(corwin)\nSubmersed(corwin)\nforall x (Dioecious(x) and Steroidal(x) -> Abysmal(x))\nforall x (Nigh(x) -> Dummy(x))\nNigh(corwin) -> Steroidal(corwin)\nforall x (Submersed(x) and Steroidal(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Dummy(x) -> Steroidal(x))\nDioecious(corwin) and Abysmal(corwin) -> Scattered(corwin)\n\nScattered(corwin)\n\nDummy(corwin) and forall x (Dummy(x) -> Steroidal(x)) -> therefore Steroidal(corwin) Submersed(corwin) and Steroidal(corwin) and forall x (Submersed(x) and Steroidal(x) -> Dioecious(x)) -> therefore Dioecious(corwin) Dioecious(corwin) and Abysmal(corwin) and Dioecious(corwin) and Abysmal(corwin) -> Scattered(corwin) -> therefore Scattered(corwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Nerissa is remarkable. Nerissa is apocryphal. Nerissa is rotund. All spread, antimonial things are remarkable. All winey things are apocryphal. If Nerissa is winey then Nerissa is antimonial. Young, antimonial things are spread. All apocryphal things are antimonial. If Nerissa is spread and Nerissa is remarkable then Nerissa is addlepated. Nerissa is not addlepated.", "logic": "\nRemarkable(nerissa)\nApocryphal(nerissa)\nRotund(nerissa)\nforall x (Spread(x) and Antimonial(x) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Winey(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\nWiney(nerissa) -> Antimonial(nerissa)\nforall x (Rotund(x) and Antimonial(x) -> Spread(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nSpread(nerissa) and Remarkable(nerissa) -> Addlepated(nerissa)\n\nnot Addlepated(nerissa)\n\nApocryphal(nerissa) and forall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Antimonial(x)) -> therefore Antimonial(nerissa) Rotund(nerissa) and Antimonial(nerissa) and forall x (Rotund(x) and Antimonial(x) -> Spread(x)) -> therefore Spread(nerissa) Spread(nerissa) and Remarkable(nerissa) and Spread(nerissa) and Remarkable(nerissa) -> Addlepated(nerissa) -> therefore Addlepated(nerissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "The giorgia is neolithic. The giorgia is malcontent. The giorgia cosh the ramesh. The ramesh is xliii. The ramesh is malcontent. The ramesh capacitate the giorgia. The ramesh cosh the giorgia. If something capacitate the ramesh and it does not eat the giorgia then the giorgia is not worrying. If something capacitate the giorgia and it is overdue then the giorgia capacitate the ramesh. If the giorgia does not eat the ramesh then the giorgia does not need the ramesh. All malcontent things are overdue. If something capacitate the ramesh then it capacitate the giorgia. If something is overdue and it cosh the ramesh then the ramesh capacitate the giorgia. The giorgia cosh the ramesh.", "logic": "\nNeolithic(giorgia)\nMalcontent(giorgia)\nCosh(giorgia, ramesh)\nXliii(ramesh)\nMalcontent(ramesh)\nCapacitate(ramesh, giorgia)\nCosh(ramesh, giorgia)\nforall x (Capacitate(x, ramesh) and not Embattle(x, giorgia) -> not Worrying(giorgia))\nforall x (Capacitate(x, giorgia) and Overdue(x) -> Capacitate(giorgia, ramesh))\nnot Embattle(giorgia, ramesh) -> not Capacitate(giorgia, ramesh)\nforall x (Malcontent(x) -> Overdue(x))\nforall x (Capacitate(x, ramesh) -> Capacitate(x, giorgia))\nforall x (Overdue(x) and Cosh(x, ramesh) -> Capacitate(ramesh, giorgia))\n\nCosh(giorgia, ramesh)\n\ntherefore Cosh(giorgia, ramesh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The cherilynn is barmy. The cherilynn is climactic. The cherilynn help the sheffield. The sheffield is gingery. The sheffield is climactic. The sheffield assign the cherilynn. The sheffield help the cherilynn. If something assign the sheffield and it does not eat the cherilynn then the cherilynn is not amphibious. If something assign the cherilynn and it is insipid then the cherilynn assign the sheffield. If the cherilynn does not eat the sheffield then the cherilynn does not need the sheffield. All climactic things are insipid. If something assign the sheffield then it assign the cherilynn. If something is insipid and it help the sheffield then the sheffield assign the cherilynn. The cherilynn is not barmy.", "logic": "\nBarmy(cherilynn)\nClimactic(cherilynn)\nHelp(cherilynn, sheffield)\nGingery(sheffield)\nClimactic(sheffield)\nAssign(sheffield, cherilynn)\nHelp(sheffield, cherilynn)\nforall x (Assign(x, sheffield) and not Heap(x, cherilynn) -> not Amphibious(cherilynn))\nforall x (Assign(x, cherilynn) and Insipid(x) -> Assign(cherilynn, sheffield))\nnot Heap(cherilynn, sheffield) -> not Assign(cherilynn, sheffield)\nforall x (Climactic(x) -> Insipid(x))\nforall x (Assign(x, sheffield) -> Assign(x, cherilynn))\nforall x (Insipid(x) and Help(x, sheffield) -> Assign(sheffield, cherilynn))\n\nnot Barmy(cherilynn)\n\ntherefore Barmy(cherilynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The bart is escaped. The bart is faultless. The bart penalise the lilah. The lilah is unwary. The lilah is faultless. The lilah commend the bart. The lilah penalise the bart. If something commend the lilah and it does not eat the bart then the bart is not forfeit. If something commend the bart and it is soleless then the bart commend the lilah. If the bart does not eat the lilah then the bart does not need the lilah. All faultless things are soleless. If something commend the lilah then it commend the bart. If something is soleless and it penalise the lilah then the lilah commend the bart. The lilah is soleless.", "logic": "\nEscaped(bart)\nFaultless(bart)\nPenalise(bart, lilah)\nUnwary(lilah)\nFaultless(lilah)\nCommend(lilah, bart)\nPenalise(lilah, bart)\nforall x (Commend(x, lilah) and not Piece(x, bart) -> not Forfeit(bart))\nforall x (Commend(x, bart) and Soleless(x) -> Commend(bart, lilah))\nnot Piece(bart, lilah) -> not Commend(bart, lilah)\nforall x (Faultless(x) -> Soleless(x))\nforall x (Commend(x, lilah) -> Commend(x, bart))\nforall x (Soleless(x) and Penalise(x, lilah) -> Commend(lilah, bart))\n\nSoleless(lilah)\n\nFaultless(lilah) and forall x (Faultless(x) -> Soleless(x)) -> therefore Soleless(lilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The mari is dipterous. The mari is upfront. The mari nose the kriste. The kriste is jade. The kriste is upfront. The kriste skive the mari. The kriste nose the mari. If something skive the kriste and it does not eat the mari then the mari is not hydrated. If something skive the mari and it is liturgical then the mari skive the kriste. If the mari does not eat the kriste then the mari does not need the kriste. All upfront things are liturgical. If something skive the kriste then it skive the mari. If something is liturgical and it nose the kriste then the kriste skive the mari. The mari is not liturgical.", "logic": "\nDipterous(mari)\nUpfront(mari)\nNose(mari, kriste)\nJade(kriste)\nUpfront(kriste)\nSkive(kriste, mari)\nNose(kriste, mari)\nforall x (Skive(x, kriste) and not Shin(x, mari) -> not Hydrated(mari))\nforall x (Skive(x, mari) and Liturgical(x) -> Skive(mari, kriste))\nnot Shin(mari, kriste) -> not Skive(mari, kriste)\nforall x (Upfront(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Skive(x, kriste) -> Skive(x, mari))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) and Nose(x, kriste) -> Skive(kriste, mari))\n\nnot Liturgical(mari)\n\nUpfront(mari) and forall x (Upfront(x) -> Liturgical(x)) -> therefore Liturgical(mari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The cele is mealy. The cele is hadal. The cele dicker the emelyne. The emelyne is astonished. The emelyne is hadal. The emelyne ostracize the cele. The emelyne dicker the cele. If something ostracize the emelyne and it does not eat the cele then the cele is not ironshod. If something ostracize the cele and it is instant then the cele ostracize the emelyne. If the cele does not eat the emelyne then the cele does not need the emelyne. All hadal things are instant. If something ostracize the emelyne then it ostracize the cele. If something is instant and it dicker the emelyne then the emelyne ostracize the cele. The cele ostracize the emelyne.", "logic": "\nMealy(cele)\nHadal(cele)\nDicker(cele, emelyne)\nAstonished(emelyne)\nHadal(emelyne)\nOstracize(emelyne, cele)\nDicker(emelyne, cele)\nforall x (Ostracize(x, emelyne) and not Depreciate(x, cele) -> not Ironshod(cele))\nforall x (Ostracize(x, cele) and Instant(x) -> Ostracize(cele, emelyne))\nnot Depreciate(cele, emelyne) -> not Ostracize(cele, emelyne)\nforall x (Hadal(x) -> Instant(x))\nforall x (Ostracize(x, emelyne) -> Ostracize(x, cele))\nforall x (Instant(x) and Dicker(x, emelyne) -> Ostracize(emelyne, cele))\n\nOstracize(cele, emelyne)\n\nHadal(emelyne) and forall x (Hadal(x) -> Instant(x)) -> therefore Instant(emelyne) Ostracize(emelyne, cele) and Instant(emelyne) and forall x (Ostracize(x, cele) and Instant(x) -> Ostracize(cele, emelyne)) -> therefore Ostracize(cele, emelyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The daisi is gutless. The daisi is unfurrowed. The daisi portion the conney. The conney is elfin. The conney is unfurrowed. The conney brecciate the daisi. The conney portion the daisi. If something brecciate the conney and it does not eat the daisi then the daisi is not unuttered. If something brecciate the daisi and it is economic then the daisi brecciate the conney. If the daisi does not eat the conney then the daisi does not need the conney. All unfurrowed things are economic. If something brecciate the conney then it brecciate the daisi. If something is economic and it portion the conney then the conney brecciate the daisi. The daisi does not need the conney.", "logic": "\nGutless(daisi)\nUnfurrowed(daisi)\nPortion(daisi, conney)\nElfin(conney)\nUnfurrowed(conney)\nBrecciate(conney, daisi)\nPortion(conney, daisi)\nforall x (Brecciate(x, conney) and not Detail(x, daisi) -> not Unuttered(daisi))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, daisi) and Economic(x) -> Brecciate(daisi, conney))\nnot Detail(daisi, conney) -> not Brecciate(daisi, conney)\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Economic(x))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, conney) -> Brecciate(x, daisi))\nforall x (Economic(x) and Portion(x, conney) -> Brecciate(conney, daisi))\n\nnot Brecciate(daisi, conney)\n\nUnfurrowed(conney) and forall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Economic(x)) -> therefore Economic(conney) Brecciate(conney, daisi) and Economic(conney) and forall x (Brecciate(x, daisi) and Economic(x) -> Brecciate(daisi, conney)) -> therefore Brecciate(daisi, conney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The joseph is inward. The joseph is alterable. The joseph hand the harlin. The harlin is cataclinal. The harlin is alterable. The harlin tauten the joseph. The harlin hand the joseph. If something tauten the harlin and it does not eat the joseph then the joseph is not phalangeal. If something tauten the joseph and it is incumbent then the joseph tauten the harlin. If the joseph does not eat the harlin then the joseph does not need the harlin. All alterable things are incumbent. If something tauten the harlin then it tauten the joseph. If something is incumbent and it hand the harlin then the harlin tauten the joseph. The joseph tauten the joseph.", "logic": "\nInward(joseph)\nAlterable(joseph)\nHand(joseph, harlin)\nCataclinal(harlin)\nAlterable(harlin)\nTauten(harlin, joseph)\nHand(harlin, joseph)\nforall x (Tauten(x, harlin) and not Satirize(x, joseph) -> not Phalangeal(joseph))\nforall x (Tauten(x, joseph) and Incumbent(x) -> Tauten(joseph, harlin))\nnot Satirize(joseph, harlin) -> not Tauten(joseph, harlin)\nforall x (Alterable(x) -> Incumbent(x))\nforall x (Tauten(x, harlin) -> Tauten(x, joseph))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) and Hand(x, harlin) -> Tauten(harlin, joseph))\n\nTauten(joseph, joseph)\n\nAlterable(harlin) and forall x (Alterable(x) -> Incumbent(x)) -> therefore Incumbent(harlin) Tauten(harlin, joseph) and Incumbent(harlin) and forall x (Tauten(x, joseph) and Incumbent(x) -> Tauten(joseph, harlin)) -> therefore Tauten(joseph, harlin) Tauten(joseph, harlin) and forall x (Tauten(x, harlin) -> Tauten(x, joseph)) -> therefore Tauten(joseph, joseph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The taryn is awestruck. The taryn is cranial. The taryn rabbit the jared. The jared is slipshod. The jared is cranial. The jared drape the taryn. The jared rabbit the taryn. If something drape the jared and it does not eat the taryn then the taryn is not astronomic. If something drape the taryn and it is factious then the taryn drape the jared. If the taryn does not eat the jared then the taryn does not need the jared. All cranial things are factious. If something drape the jared then it drape the taryn. If something is factious and it rabbit the jared then the jared drape the taryn. The taryn does not need the taryn.", "logic": "\nAwestruck(taryn)\nCranial(taryn)\nRabbit(taryn, jared)\nSlipshod(jared)\nCranial(jared)\nDrape(jared, taryn)\nRabbit(jared, taryn)\nforall x (Drape(x, jared) and not Homogenize(x, taryn) -> not Astronomic(taryn))\nforall x (Drape(x, taryn) and Factious(x) -> Drape(taryn, jared))\nnot Homogenize(taryn, jared) -> not Drape(taryn, jared)\nforall x (Cranial(x) -> Factious(x))\nforall x (Drape(x, jared) -> Drape(x, taryn))\nforall x (Factious(x) and Rabbit(x, jared) -> Drape(jared, taryn))\n\nnot Drape(taryn, taryn)\n\nCranial(jared) and forall x (Cranial(x) -> Factious(x)) -> therefore Factious(jared) Drape(jared, taryn) and Factious(jared) and forall x (Drape(x, taryn) and Factious(x) -> Drape(taryn, jared)) -> therefore Drape(taryn, jared) Drape(taryn, jared) and forall x (Drape(x, jared) -> Drape(x, taryn)) -> therefore Drape(taryn, taryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The ward is tertian. The ward is aphoristic. The ward emigrate the pincas. The pincas is cheliceral. The pincas is aphoristic. The pincas permute the ward. The pincas emigrate the ward. If something permute the pincas and it does not eat the ward then the ward is not obstetric. If something permute the ward and it is homophile then the ward permute the pincas. If the ward does not eat the pincas then the ward does not need the pincas. All aphoristic things are homophile. If something permute the pincas then it permute the ward. If something is homophile and it emigrate the pincas then the pincas permute the ward. The ward is not cheliceral.", "logic": "\nTertian(ward)\nAphoristic(ward)\nEmigrate(ward, pincas)\nCheliceral(pincas)\nAphoristic(pincas)\nPermute(pincas, ward)\nEmigrate(pincas, ward)\nforall x (Permute(x, pincas) and not Retool(x, ward) -> not Obstetric(ward))\nforall x (Permute(x, ward) and Homophile(x) -> Permute(ward, pincas))\nnot Retool(ward, pincas) -> not Permute(ward, pincas)\nforall x (Aphoristic(x) -> Homophile(x))\nforall x (Permute(x, pincas) -> Permute(x, ward))\nforall x (Homophile(x) and Emigrate(x, pincas) -> Permute(pincas, ward))\n\nnot Cheliceral(ward)\n\nnot Cheliceral(ward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The charla is flowerless. The charla is tingling. The charla idle the ginelle. The ginelle is regulatory. The ginelle is tingling. The ginelle racket the charla. The ginelle idle the charla. If something racket the ginelle and it does not eat the charla then the charla is not fossil. If something racket the charla and it is scapose then the charla racket the ginelle. If the charla does not eat the ginelle then the charla does not need the ginelle. All tingling things are scapose. If something racket the ginelle then it racket the charla. If something is scapose and it idle the ginelle then the ginelle racket the charla. The ginelle stifle the charla.", "logic": "\nFlowerless(charla)\nTingling(charla)\nIdle(charla, ginelle)\nRegulatory(ginelle)\nTingling(ginelle)\nRacket(ginelle, charla)\nIdle(ginelle, charla)\nforall x (Racket(x, ginelle) and not Stifle(x, charla) -> not Fossil(charla))\nforall x (Racket(x, charla) and Scapose(x) -> Racket(charla, ginelle))\nnot Stifle(charla, ginelle) -> not Racket(charla, ginelle)\nforall x (Tingling(x) -> Scapose(x))\nforall x (Racket(x, ginelle) -> Racket(x, charla))\nforall x (Scapose(x) and Idle(x, ginelle) -> Racket(ginelle, charla))\n\nStifle(ginelle, charla)\n\nStifle(ginelle, charla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The leola is proximo. The leola is insulting. The leola misspell the zorro. The zorro is hairless. The zorro is insulting. The zorro aspire the leola. The zorro misspell the leola. If something aspire the zorro and it does not eat the leola then the leola is not carven. If something aspire the leola and it is tireless then the leola aspire the zorro. If the leola does not eat the zorro then the leola does not need the zorro. All insulting things are tireless. If something aspire the zorro then it aspire the leola. If something is tireless and it misspell the zorro then the zorro aspire the leola. The leola does not visit the leola.", "logic": "\nProximo(leola)\nInsulting(leola)\nMisspell(leola, zorro)\nHairless(zorro)\nInsulting(zorro)\nAspire(zorro, leola)\nMisspell(zorro, leola)\nforall x (Aspire(x, zorro) and not Symmetrize(x, leola) -> not Carven(leola))\nforall x (Aspire(x, leola) and Tireless(x) -> Aspire(leola, zorro))\nnot Symmetrize(leola, zorro) -> not Aspire(leola, zorro)\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Aspire(x, zorro) -> Aspire(x, leola))\nforall x (Tireless(x) and Misspell(x, zorro) -> Aspire(zorro, leola))\n\nnot Misspell(leola, leola)\n\nnot Misspell(leola, leola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The britani is conjoint. The britani is shakedown. The britani immolate the filip. The filip is blastemal. The filip is shakedown. The filip clinch the britani. The filip immolate the britani. If something clinch the filip and it does not eat the britani then the britani is not slow. If something clinch the britani and it is empty then the britani clinch the filip. If the britani does not eat the filip then the britani does not need the filip. All shakedown things are empty. If something clinch the filip then it clinch the britani. If something is empty and it immolate the filip then the filip clinch the britani. The filip is conjoint.", "logic": "\nConjoint(britani)\nShakedown(britani)\nImmolate(britani, filip)\nBlastemal(filip)\nShakedown(filip)\nClinch(filip, britani)\nImmolate(filip, britani)\nforall x (Clinch(x, filip) and not Squish(x, britani) -> not Slow(britani))\nforall x (Clinch(x, britani) and Empty(x) -> Clinch(britani, filip))\nnot Squish(britani, filip) -> not Clinch(britani, filip)\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Empty(x))\nforall x (Clinch(x, filip) -> Clinch(x, britani))\nforall x (Empty(x) and Immolate(x, filip) -> Clinch(filip, britani))\n\nConjoint(filip)\n\nConjoint(filip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The bobbi is unlicenced. The bobbi is petrifying. The bobbi block the celestyna. The celestyna is reformed. The celestyna is petrifying. The celestyna sheathe the bobbi. The celestyna block the bobbi. If something sheathe the celestyna and it does not eat the bobbi then the bobbi is not defined. If something sheathe the bobbi and it is dissonant then the bobbi sheathe the celestyna. If the bobbi does not eat the celestyna then the bobbi does not need the celestyna. All petrifying things are dissonant. If something sheathe the celestyna then it sheathe the bobbi. If something is dissonant and it block the celestyna then the celestyna sheathe the bobbi. The celestyna is not defined.", "logic": "\nUnlicenced(bobbi)\nPetrifying(bobbi)\nBlock(bobbi, celestyna)\nReformed(celestyna)\nPetrifying(celestyna)\nSheathe(celestyna, bobbi)\nBlock(celestyna, bobbi)\nforall x (Sheathe(x, celestyna) and not Stunt(x, bobbi) -> not Defined(bobbi))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, bobbi) and Dissonant(x) -> Sheathe(bobbi, celestyna))\nnot Stunt(bobbi, celestyna) -> not Sheathe(bobbi, celestyna)\nforall x (Petrifying(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, celestyna) -> Sheathe(x, bobbi))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) and Block(x, celestyna) -> Sheathe(celestyna, bobbi))\n\nnot Defined(celestyna)\n\nnot Defined(celestyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The chen is placed. The chen is eldest. The chen reproduce the izaak. The izaak is absorbable. The izaak is eldest. The izaak unitize the chen. The izaak reproduce the chen. If something unitize the izaak and it does not eat the chen then the chen is not kinetic. If something unitize the chen and it is elementary then the chen unitize the izaak. If the chen does not eat the izaak then the chen does not need the izaak. All eldest things are elementary. If something unitize the izaak then it unitize the chen. If something is elementary and it reproduce the izaak then the izaak unitize the chen. The izaak unknot the izaak.", "logic": "\nPlaced(chen)\nEldest(chen)\nReproduce(chen, izaak)\nAbsorbable(izaak)\nEldest(izaak)\nUnitize(izaak, chen)\nReproduce(izaak, chen)\nforall x (Unitize(x, izaak) and not Unknot(x, chen) -> not Kinetic(chen))\nforall x (Unitize(x, chen) and Elementary(x) -> Unitize(chen, izaak))\nnot Unknot(chen, izaak) -> not Unitize(chen, izaak)\nforall x (Eldest(x) -> Elementary(x))\nforall x (Unitize(x, izaak) -> Unitize(x, chen))\nforall x (Elementary(x) and Reproduce(x, izaak) -> Unitize(izaak, chen))\n\nUnknot(izaak, izaak)\n\nUnknot(izaak, izaak) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The gunner is witty. The gunner is parisian. The gunner blabber the alexia. The alexia is lackluster. The alexia is parisian. The alexia aphorise the gunner. The alexia blabber the gunner. If something aphorise the alexia and it does not eat the gunner then the gunner is not oviform. If something aphorise the gunner and it is mixable then the gunner aphorise the alexia. If the gunner does not eat the alexia then the gunner does not need the alexia. All parisian things are mixable. If something aphorise the alexia then it aphorise the gunner. If something is mixable and it blabber the alexia then the alexia aphorise the gunner. The alexia does not visit the alexia.", "logic": "\nWitty(gunner)\nParisian(gunner)\nBlabber(gunner, alexia)\nLackluster(alexia)\nParisian(alexia)\nAphorise(alexia, gunner)\nBlabber(alexia, gunner)\nforall x (Aphorise(x, alexia) and not Reduce(x, gunner) -> not Oviform(gunner))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, gunner) and Mixable(x) -> Aphorise(gunner, alexia))\nnot Reduce(gunner, alexia) -> not Aphorise(gunner, alexia)\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Mixable(x))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, alexia) -> Aphorise(x, gunner))\nforall x (Mixable(x) and Blabber(x, alexia) -> Aphorise(alexia, gunner))\n\nnot Blabber(alexia, alexia)\n\nnot Blabber(alexia, alexia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The merv is snide. The merv is honeylike. The merv place the vere. The vere is ajar. The vere is honeylike. The vere apotheose the merv. The vere place the merv. If something apotheose the vere and it does not eat the merv then the merv is not amiss. If something apotheose the merv and it is majuscule then the merv apotheose the vere. If the merv does not eat the vere then the merv does not need the vere. All honeylike things are majuscule. If something apotheose the vere then it apotheose the merv. If something is majuscule and it place the vere then the vere apotheose the merv. The merv is amiss.", "logic": "\nSnide(merv)\nHoneylike(merv)\nPlace(merv, vere)\nAjar(vere)\nHoneylike(vere)\nApotheose(vere, merv)\nPlace(vere, merv)\nforall x (Apotheose(x, vere) and not Fulfill(x, merv) -> not Amiss(merv))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, merv) and Majuscule(x) -> Apotheose(merv, vere))\nnot Fulfill(merv, vere) -> not Apotheose(merv, vere)\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> Majuscule(x))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, vere) -> Apotheose(x, merv))\nforall x (Majuscule(x) and Place(x, vere) -> Apotheose(vere, merv))\n\nAmiss(merv)\n\nAmiss(merv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "Allen is not bespoken. Ezechiel is upcountry. Thomasa is upcountry. Madge is brahminic. If Ezechiel is bituminoid and Ezechiel is brahminic then Ezechiel is bespoken. Furry, stalinist people are monovalent. If someone is brahminic then they are stalinist. If someone is stalinist then they are bespoken. All brahminic, upcountry people are not bituminoid. If someone is bespoken then they are bituminoid. All stalinist people are bituminoid. If someone is monovalent and not polynomial then they are brahminic. Allen is not bespoken.", "logic": "\nnot Bespoken(allen)\nUpcountry(ezechiel)\nUpcountry(thomasa)\nBrahminic(madge)\nBituminoid(ezechiel) and Brahminic(ezechiel) -> Bespoken(ezechiel)\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) and Stalinist(x) -> Monovalent(x))\nforall x (Brahminic(x) -> Stalinist(x))\nforall x (Stalinist(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Brahminic(x) and Upcountry(x) -> not Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Stalinist(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Monovalent(x) and not Polynomial(x) -> Brahminic(x))\n\nnot Bespoken(allen)\n\ntherefore not Bespoken(allen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Dione is not nonspatial. Gavin is chapped. Georgette is chapped. Alvera is borated. If Gavin is dreamless and Gavin is borated then Gavin is nonspatial. Furry, primed people are flighted. If someone is borated then they are primed. If someone is primed then they are nonspatial. All borated, chapped people are not dreamless. If someone is nonspatial then they are dreamless. All primed people are dreamless. If someone is flighted and not invasive then they are borated. Georgette is not chapped.", "logic": "\nnot Nonspatial(dione)\nChapped(gavin)\nChapped(georgette)\nBorated(alvera)\nDreamless(gavin) and Borated(gavin) -> Nonspatial(gavin)\nforall x (Dreamless(x) and Primed(x) -> Flighted(x))\nforall x (Borated(x) -> Primed(x))\nforall x (Primed(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Borated(x) and Chapped(x) -> not Dreamless(x))\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Dreamless(x))\nforall x (Primed(x) -> Dreamless(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) and not Invasive(x) -> Borated(x))\n\nnot Chapped(georgette)\n\ntherefore Chapped(georgette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Alys is not frumpy. Shay is parallel. Jenda is parallel. Eleanore is unrealized. If Shay is sulfurous and Shay is unrealized then Shay is frumpy. Furry, viselike people are unbaptised. If someone is unrealized then they are viselike. If someone is viselike then they are frumpy. All unrealized, parallel people are not sulfurous. If someone is frumpy then they are sulfurous. All viselike people are sulfurous. If someone is unbaptised and not spurting then they are unrealized. Eleanore is viselike.", "logic": "\nnot Frumpy(alys)\nParallel(shay)\nParallel(jenda)\nUnrealized(eleanore)\nSulfurous(shay) and Unrealized(shay) -> Frumpy(shay)\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) and Viselike(x) -> Unbaptised(x))\nforall x (Unrealized(x) -> Viselike(x))\nforall x (Viselike(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nforall x (Unrealized(x) and Parallel(x) -> not Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Frumpy(x) -> Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Viselike(x) -> Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and not Spurting(x) -> Unrealized(x))\n\nViselike(eleanore)\n\nUnrealized(eleanore) and forall x (Unrealized(x) -> Viselike(x)) -> therefore Viselike(eleanore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Hestia is not thankless. Ignace is housebound. Alexine is housebound. Elsa is astounding. If Ignace is xlvi and Ignace is astounding then Ignace is thankless. Furry, stoppered people are entozoic. If someone is astounding then they are stoppered. If someone is stoppered then they are thankless. All astounding, housebound people are not xlvi. If someone is thankless then they are xlvi. All stoppered people are xlvi. If someone is entozoic and not painless then they are astounding. Elsa is not stoppered.", "logic": "\nnot Thankless(hestia)\nHousebound(ignace)\nHousebound(alexine)\nAstounding(elsa)\nXlvi(ignace) and Astounding(ignace) -> Thankless(ignace)\nforall x (Xlvi(x) and Stoppered(x) -> Entozoic(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Stoppered(x) -> Thankless(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) and Housebound(x) -> not Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Thankless(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Stoppered(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) and not Painless(x) -> Astounding(x))\n\nnot Stoppered(elsa)\n\nAstounding(elsa) and forall x (Astounding(x) -> Stoppered(x)) -> therefore Stoppered(elsa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Lorenzo is not stopped. Andie is ignitible. Deborah is ignitible. Jorrie is realistic. If Andie is unimproved and Andie is realistic then Andie is stopped. Furry, liked people are russet. If someone is realistic then they are liked. If someone is liked then they are stopped. All realistic, ignitible people are not unimproved. If someone is stopped then they are unimproved. All liked people are unimproved. If someone is russet and not bilobate then they are realistic. Jorrie is stopped.", "logic": "\nnot Stopped(lorenzo)\nIgnitible(andie)\nIgnitible(deborah)\nRealistic(jorrie)\nUnimproved(andie) and Realistic(andie) -> Stopped(andie)\nforall x (Unimproved(x) and Liked(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Liked(x) -> Stopped(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) and Ignitible(x) -> not Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Stopped(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Liked(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Russet(x) and not Bilobate(x) -> Realistic(x))\n\nStopped(jorrie)\n\nRealistic(jorrie) and forall x (Realistic(x) -> Liked(x)) -> therefore Liked(jorrie) Liked(jorrie) and forall x (Liked(x) -> Stopped(x)) -> therefore Stopped(jorrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Faina is not aweigh. Candy is squeaky. Lynea is squeaky. Abra is broody. If Candy is cimmerian and Candy is broody then Candy is aweigh. Furry, apparent people are ethical. If someone is broody then they are apparent. If someone is apparent then they are aweigh. All broody, squeaky people are not cimmerian. If someone is aweigh then they are cimmerian. All apparent people are cimmerian. If someone is ethical and not twelfth then they are broody. Abra is not aweigh.", "logic": "\nnot Aweigh(faina)\nSqueaky(candy)\nSqueaky(lynea)\nBroody(abra)\nCimmerian(candy) and Broody(candy) -> Aweigh(candy)\nforall x (Cimmerian(x) and Apparent(x) -> Ethical(x))\nforall x (Broody(x) -> Apparent(x))\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Broody(x) and Squeaky(x) -> not Cimmerian(x))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Cimmerian(x))\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Cimmerian(x))\nforall x (Ethical(x) and not Twelfth(x) -> Broody(x))\n\nnot Aweigh(abra)\n\nBroody(abra) and forall x (Broody(x) -> Apparent(x)) -> therefore Apparent(abra) Apparent(abra) and forall x (Apparent(x) -> Aweigh(x)) -> therefore Aweigh(abra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Madelene is not steadying. Murphy is eupneic. Wilt is eupneic. Luella is permeable. If Murphy is sheeplike and Murphy is permeable then Murphy is steadying. Furry, silty people are priapic. If someone is permeable then they are silty. If someone is silty then they are steadying. All permeable, eupneic people are not sheeplike. If someone is steadying then they are sheeplike. All silty people are sheeplike. If someone is priapic and not epidemic then they are permeable. Luella is priapic.", "logic": "\nnot Steadying(madelene)\nEupneic(murphy)\nEupneic(wilt)\nPermeable(luella)\nSheeplike(murphy) and Permeable(murphy) -> Steadying(murphy)\nforall x (Sheeplike(x) and Silty(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Permeable(x) -> Silty(x))\nforall x (Silty(x) -> Steadying(x))\nforall x (Permeable(x) and Eupneic(x) -> not Sheeplike(x))\nforall x (Steadying(x) -> Sheeplike(x))\nforall x (Silty(x) -> Sheeplike(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) and not Epidemic(x) -> Permeable(x))\n\nPriapic(luella)\n\nPermeable(luella) and forall x (Permeable(x) -> Silty(x)) -> therefore Silty(luella) Silty(luella) and forall x (Silty(x) -> Sheeplike(x)) -> therefore Sheeplike(luella) Permeable(luella) and forall x (Permeable(x) -> Silty(x)) -> therefore Silty(luella) Sheeplike(luella) and Silty(luella) and forall x (Sheeplike(x) and Silty(x) -> Priapic(x)) -> therefore Priapic(luella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Evelyn is not oblong. Zack is unpotted. Sally is unpotted. Selestina is heathenish. If Zack is allantoic and Zack is heathenish then Zack is oblong. Furry, filarial people are damaging. If someone is heathenish then they are filarial. If someone is filarial then they are oblong. All heathenish, unpotted people are not allantoic. If someone is oblong then they are allantoic. All filarial people are allantoic. If someone is damaging and not neuronal then they are heathenish. Selestina is not damaging.", "logic": "\nnot Oblong(evelyn)\nUnpotted(zack)\nUnpotted(sally)\nHeathenish(selestina)\nAllantoic(zack) and Heathenish(zack) -> Oblong(zack)\nforall x (Allantoic(x) and Filarial(x) -> Damaging(x))\nforall x (Heathenish(x) -> Filarial(x))\nforall x (Filarial(x) -> Oblong(x))\nforall x (Heathenish(x) and Unpotted(x) -> not Allantoic(x))\nforall x (Oblong(x) -> Allantoic(x))\nforall x (Filarial(x) -> Allantoic(x))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and not Neuronal(x) -> Heathenish(x))\n\nnot Damaging(selestina)\n\nHeathenish(selestina) and forall x (Heathenish(x) -> Filarial(x)) -> therefore Filarial(selestina) Filarial(selestina) and forall x (Filarial(x) -> Allantoic(x)) -> therefore Allantoic(selestina) Heathenish(selestina) and forall x (Heathenish(x) -> Filarial(x)) -> therefore Filarial(selestina) Allantoic(selestina) and Filarial(selestina) and forall x (Allantoic(x) and Filarial(x) -> Damaging(x)) -> therefore Damaging(selestina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Sukey is not deafening. Klarrisa is isometric. Douglass is isometric. Susy is auburn. If Klarrisa is unseeable and Klarrisa is auburn then Klarrisa is deafening. Furry, cuprous people are unwell. If someone is auburn then they are cuprous. If someone is cuprous then they are deafening. All auburn, isometric people are not unseeable. If someone is deafening then they are unseeable. All cuprous people are unseeable. If someone is unwell and not silty then they are auburn. Douglass is not deafening.", "logic": "\nnot Deafening(sukey)\nIsometric(klarrisa)\nIsometric(douglass)\nAuburn(susy)\nUnseeable(klarrisa) and Auburn(klarrisa) -> Deafening(klarrisa)\nforall x (Unseeable(x) and Cuprous(x) -> Unwell(x))\nforall x (Auburn(x) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Cuprous(x) -> Deafening(x))\nforall x (Auburn(x) and Isometric(x) -> not Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Cuprous(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Unwell(x) and not Silty(x) -> Auburn(x))\n\nnot Deafening(douglass)\n\nforall x (Cuprous(x) -> Deafening(x)) <- forall x (Auburn(x) -> Cuprous(x)) <- forall x (Unwell(x) and not Silty(x) -> Auburn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Bev is not apocarpous. Robinet is blasting. Margurite is blasting. Joan is smothering. If Robinet is thin and Robinet is smothering then Robinet is apocarpous. Furry, libelous people are relocated. If someone is smothering then they are libelous. If someone is libelous then they are apocarpous. All smothering, blasting people are not thin. If someone is apocarpous then they are thin. All libelous people are thin. If someone is relocated and not lively then they are smothering. Robinet is smothering.", "logic": "\nnot Apocarpous(bev)\nBlasting(robinet)\nBlasting(margurite)\nSmothering(joan)\nThin(robinet) and Smothering(robinet) -> Apocarpous(robinet)\nforall x (Thin(x) and Libelous(x) -> Relocated(x))\nforall x (Smothering(x) -> Libelous(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Smothering(x) and Blasting(x) -> not Thin(x))\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Relocated(x) and not Lively(x) -> Smothering(x))\n\nSmothering(robinet)\n\nforall x (Relocated(x) and not Lively(x) -> Smothering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Melantha is not colicky. Tine is outdated. Teresa is outdated. Terina is unaware. If Tine is planetal and Tine is unaware then Tine is colicky. Furry, abusive people are rush. If someone is unaware then they are abusive. If someone is abusive then they are colicky. All unaware, outdated people are not planetal. If someone is colicky then they are planetal. All abusive people are planetal. If someone is rush and not conical then they are unaware. Teresa is not planetal.", "logic": "\nnot Colicky(melantha)\nOutdated(tine)\nOutdated(teresa)\nUnaware(terina)\nPlanetal(tine) and Unaware(tine) -> Colicky(tine)\nforall x (Planetal(x) and Abusive(x) -> Rush(x))\nforall x (Unaware(x) -> Abusive(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Colicky(x))\nforall x (Unaware(x) and Outdated(x) -> not Planetal(x))\nforall x (Colicky(x) -> Planetal(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Planetal(x))\nforall x (Rush(x) and not Conical(x) -> Unaware(x))\n\nnot Planetal(teresa)\n\nforall x (Colicky(x) -> Planetal(x)) <- forall x (Abusive(x) -> Colicky(x)) <- forall x (Unaware(x) -> Abusive(x)) <- forall x (Rush(x) and not Conical(x) -> Unaware(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Freda is not petrifying. Dabney is cheesy. Nolan is cheesy. Ingmar is extensive. If Dabney is affable and Dabney is extensive then Dabney is petrifying. Furry, cuboidal people are inflamed. If someone is extensive then they are cuboidal. If someone is cuboidal then they are petrifying. All extensive, cheesy people are not affable. If someone is petrifying then they are affable. All cuboidal people are affable. If someone is inflamed and not astute then they are extensive. Dabney is inflamed.", "logic": "\nnot Petrifying(freda)\nCheesy(dabney)\nCheesy(nolan)\nExtensive(ingmar)\nAffable(dabney) and Extensive(dabney) -> Petrifying(dabney)\nforall x (Affable(x) and Cuboidal(x) -> Inflamed(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Cuboidal(x))\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Cheesy(x) -> not Affable(x))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) -> Affable(x))\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) -> Affable(x))\nforall x (Inflamed(x) and not Astute(x) -> Extensive(x))\n\nInflamed(dabney)\n\nforall x (Affable(x) and Cuboidal(x) -> Inflamed(x)) <- forall x (Extensive(x) -> Cuboidal(x)) <- forall x (Inflamed(x) and not Astute(x) -> Extensive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Martica is not reciprocal. Milly is clenched. Ulysses is clenched. Doroteya is dosed. If Milly is vagrant and Milly is dosed then Milly is reciprocal. Furry, maiden people are nordic. If someone is dosed then they are maiden. If someone is maiden then they are reciprocal. All dosed, clenched people are not vagrant. If someone is reciprocal then they are vagrant. All maiden people are vagrant. If someone is nordic and not advisory then they are dosed. Doroteya is not clenched.", "logic": "\nnot Reciprocal(martica)\nClenched(milly)\nClenched(ulysses)\nDosed(doroteya)\nVagrant(milly) and Dosed(milly) -> Reciprocal(milly)\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and Maiden(x) -> Nordic(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) -> Maiden(x))\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> Reciprocal(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) and Clenched(x) -> not Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Reciprocal(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Nordic(x) and not Advisory(x) -> Dosed(x))\n\nnot Clenched(doroteya)\n\nnot Clenched(doroteya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Adaline is not vanished. Harrold is bicolor. Dwain is bicolor. Rutledge is scrappy. If Harrold is hematal and Harrold is scrappy then Harrold is vanished. Furry, placoid people are refulgent. If someone is scrappy then they are placoid. If someone is placoid then they are vanished. All scrappy, bicolor people are not hematal. If someone is vanished then they are hematal. All placoid people are hematal. If someone is refulgent and not easygoing then they are scrappy. Rutledge is easygoing.", "logic": "\nnot Vanished(adaline)\nBicolor(harrold)\nBicolor(dwain)\nScrappy(rutledge)\nHematal(harrold) and Scrappy(harrold) -> Vanished(harrold)\nforall x (Hematal(x) and Placoid(x) -> Refulgent(x))\nforall x (Scrappy(x) -> Placoid(x))\nforall x (Placoid(x) -> Vanished(x))\nforall x (Scrappy(x) and Bicolor(x) -> not Hematal(x))\nforall x (Vanished(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Placoid(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Refulgent(x) and not Easygoing(x) -> Scrappy(x))\n\nEasygoing(rutledge)\n\nEasygoing(rutledge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Waylon is not uncrowned. Casper is handy. Wendie is handy. Carina is bounded. If Casper is troubling and Casper is bounded then Casper is uncrowned. Furry, amusive people are debauched. If someone is bounded then they are amusive. If someone is amusive then they are uncrowned. All bounded, handy people are not troubling. If someone is uncrowned then they are troubling. All amusive people are troubling. If someone is debauched and not absorbed then they are bounded. Waylon is not absorbed.", "logic": "\nnot Uncrowned(waylon)\nHandy(casper)\nHandy(wendie)\nBounded(carina)\nTroubling(casper) and Bounded(casper) -> Uncrowned(casper)\nforall x (Troubling(x) and Amusive(x) -> Debauched(x))\nforall x (Bounded(x) -> Amusive(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Uncrowned(x))\nforall x (Bounded(x) and Handy(x) -> not Troubling(x))\nforall x (Uncrowned(x) -> Troubling(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Troubling(x))\nforall x (Debauched(x) and not Absorbed(x) -> Bounded(x))\n\nnot Absorbed(waylon)\n\nnot Absorbed(waylon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Estrella is not arabic. Nonah is grazed. Sande is grazed. Ronda is limacoid. If Nonah is goodly and Nonah is limacoid then Nonah is arabic. Furry, yearly people are precocious. If someone is limacoid then they are yearly. If someone is yearly then they are arabic. All limacoid, grazed people are not goodly. If someone is arabic then they are goodly. All yearly people are goodly. If someone is precocious and not rearmost then they are limacoid. Nonah is rearmost.", "logic": "\nnot Arabic(estrella)\nGrazed(nonah)\nGrazed(sande)\nLimacoid(ronda)\nGoodly(nonah) and Limacoid(nonah) -> Arabic(nonah)\nforall x (Goodly(x) and Yearly(x) -> Precocious(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Arabic(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) and Grazed(x) -> not Goodly(x))\nforall x (Arabic(x) -> Goodly(x))\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Goodly(x))\nforall x (Precocious(x) and not Rearmost(x) -> Limacoid(x))\n\nRearmost(nonah)\n\nRearmost(nonah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Darla is not aneurysmal. Bernita is unkind. If Bernita is unkind then Bernita is aneurysmal. If something is unkind and aneurysmal then it is cloistered. If something is unkind and not unproven then it is ammoniac. All colorectal things are ammoniac. All unproven things are derivable. If something is unkind and ammoniac then it is derivable. If something is cloistered then it is derivable. If something is unproven and not cloistered then it is not colorectal. Bernita is unkind.", "logic": "\nnot Aneurysmal(darla)\nUnkind(bernita)\nUnkind(bernita) -> Aneurysmal(bernita)\nforall x (Unkind(x) and Aneurysmal(x) -> Cloistered(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) and not Unproven(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Colorectal(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Derivable(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) and Ammoniac(x) -> Derivable(x))\nforall x (Cloistered(x) -> Derivable(x))\nforall x (Unproven(x) and not Cloistered(x) -> not Colorectal(x))\n\nUnkind(bernita)\n\ntherefore Unkind(bernita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Suzanna is not tympanitic. Corena is alarming. If Corena is alarming then Corena is tympanitic. If something is alarming and tympanitic then it is coaxing. If something is alarming and not precooked then it is deciding. All propellant things are deciding. All precooked things are real. If something is alarming and deciding then it is real. If something is coaxing then it is real. If something is precooked and not coaxing then it is not propellant. Suzanna is tympanitic.", "logic": "\nnot Tympanitic(suzanna)\nAlarming(corena)\nAlarming(corena) -> Tympanitic(corena)\nforall x (Alarming(x) and Tympanitic(x) -> Coaxing(x))\nforall x (Alarming(x) and not Precooked(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Propellant(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Precooked(x) -> Real(x))\nforall x (Alarming(x) and Deciding(x) -> Real(x))\nforall x (Coaxing(x) -> Real(x))\nforall x (Precooked(x) and not Coaxing(x) -> not Propellant(x))\n\nTympanitic(suzanna)\n\ntherefore not Tympanitic(suzanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Kathryn is not clouded. Stefanie is over. If Stefanie is over then Stefanie is clouded. If something is over and clouded then it is geocentric. If something is over and not rhymeless then it is riparian. All headed things are riparian. All rhymeless things are swank. If something is over and riparian then it is swank. If something is geocentric then it is swank. If something is rhymeless and not geocentric then it is not headed. Stefanie is clouded.", "logic": "\nnot Clouded(kathryn)\nOver(stefanie)\nOver(stefanie) -> Clouded(stefanie)\nforall x (Over(x) and Clouded(x) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Over(x) and not Rhymeless(x) -> Riparian(x))\nforall x (Headed(x) -> Riparian(x))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Swank(x))\nforall x (Over(x) and Riparian(x) -> Swank(x))\nforall x (Geocentric(x) -> Swank(x))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) and not Geocentric(x) -> not Headed(x))\n\nClouded(stefanie)\n\nOver(stefanie) and Over(stefanie) -> Clouded(stefanie) -> therefore Clouded(stefanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Paten is not otic. Patrizia is ghanian. If Patrizia is ghanian then Patrizia is otic. If something is ghanian and otic then it is binocular. If something is ghanian and not throated then it is mythic. All plangent things are mythic. All throated things are circular. If something is ghanian and mythic then it is circular. If something is binocular then it is circular. If something is throated and not binocular then it is not plangent. Patrizia is not otic.", "logic": "\nnot Otic(paten)\nGhanian(patrizia)\nGhanian(patrizia) -> Otic(patrizia)\nforall x (Ghanian(x) and Otic(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) and not Throated(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Plangent(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Throated(x) -> Circular(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) and Mythic(x) -> Circular(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Circular(x))\nforall x (Throated(x) and not Binocular(x) -> not Plangent(x))\n\nnot Otic(patrizia)\n\nGhanian(patrizia) and Ghanian(patrizia) -> Otic(patrizia) -> therefore Otic(patrizia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Evvy is not chelonian. Joli is candent. If Joli is candent then Joli is chelonian. If something is candent and chelonian then it is thriving. If something is candent and not particular then it is anarchical. All stinging things are anarchical. All particular things are deterrent. If something is candent and anarchical then it is deterrent. If something is thriving then it is deterrent. If something is particular and not thriving then it is not stinging. Joli is thriving.", "logic": "\nnot Chelonian(evvy)\nCandent(joli)\nCandent(joli) -> Chelonian(joli)\nforall x (Candent(x) and Chelonian(x) -> Thriving(x))\nforall x (Candent(x) and not Particular(x) -> Anarchical(x))\nforall x (Stinging(x) -> Anarchical(x))\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Candent(x) and Anarchical(x) -> Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Thriving(x) -> Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Particular(x) and not Thriving(x) -> not Stinging(x))\n\nThriving(joli)\n\nCandent(joli) and Candent(joli) -> Chelonian(joli) -> therefore Chelonian(joli) Candent(joli) and Chelonian(joli) and forall x (Candent(x) and Chelonian(x) -> Thriving(x)) -> therefore Thriving(joli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Amalita is not deafened. Sinclare is binuclear. If Sinclare is binuclear then Sinclare is deafened. If something is binuclear and deafened then it is manlike. If something is binuclear and not costumed then it is ravening. All foregone things are ravening. All costumed things are vesical. If something is binuclear and ravening then it is vesical. If something is manlike then it is vesical. If something is costumed and not manlike then it is not foregone. Sinclare is not manlike.", "logic": "\nnot Deafened(amalita)\nBinuclear(sinclare)\nBinuclear(sinclare) -> Deafened(sinclare)\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and Deafened(x) -> Manlike(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and not Costumed(x) -> Ravening(x))\nforall x (Foregone(x) -> Ravening(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) -> Vesical(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and Ravening(x) -> Vesical(x))\nforall x (Manlike(x) -> Vesical(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) and not Manlike(x) -> not Foregone(x))\n\nnot Manlike(sinclare)\n\nBinuclear(sinclare) and Binuclear(sinclare) -> Deafened(sinclare) -> therefore Deafened(sinclare) Binuclear(sinclare) and Deafened(sinclare) and forall x (Binuclear(x) and Deafened(x) -> Manlike(x)) -> therefore Manlike(sinclare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Davy is not congruous. Didi is braky. If Didi is braky then Didi is congruous. If something is braky and congruous then it is agape. If something is braky and not sensorial then it is unselfish. All unsociable things are unselfish. All sensorial things are flaccid. If something is braky and unselfish then it is flaccid. If something is agape then it is flaccid. If something is sensorial and not agape then it is not unsociable. Didi is flaccid.", "logic": "\nnot Congruous(davy)\nBraky(didi)\nBraky(didi) -> Congruous(didi)\nforall x (Braky(x) and Congruous(x) -> Agape(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and not Sensorial(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Sensorial(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and Unselfish(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Sensorial(x) and not Agape(x) -> not Unsociable(x))\n\nFlaccid(didi)\n\nBraky(didi) and Braky(didi) -> Congruous(didi) -> therefore Congruous(didi) Braky(didi) and Congruous(didi) and forall x (Braky(x) and Congruous(x) -> Agape(x)) -> therefore Agape(didi) Agape(didi) and forall x (Agape(x) -> Flaccid(x)) -> therefore Flaccid(didi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Faustina is not premedical. Merrilee is nether. If Merrilee is nether then Merrilee is premedical. If something is nether and premedical then it is flavourous. If something is nether and not apsidal then it is boyish. All fluffy things are boyish. All apsidal things are manifest. If something is nether and boyish then it is manifest. If something is flavourous then it is manifest. If something is apsidal and not flavourous then it is not fluffy. Merrilee is not manifest.", "logic": "\nnot Premedical(faustina)\nNether(merrilee)\nNether(merrilee) -> Premedical(merrilee)\nforall x (Nether(x) and Premedical(x) -> Flavourous(x))\nforall x (Nether(x) and not Apsidal(x) -> Boyish(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) -> Boyish(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Nether(x) and Boyish(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Flavourous(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and not Flavourous(x) -> not Fluffy(x))\n\nnot Manifest(merrilee)\n\nNether(merrilee) and Nether(merrilee) -> Premedical(merrilee) -> therefore Premedical(merrilee) Nether(merrilee) and Premedical(merrilee) and forall x (Nether(x) and Premedical(x) -> Flavourous(x)) -> therefore Flavourous(merrilee) Flavourous(merrilee) and forall x (Flavourous(x) -> Manifest(x)) -> therefore Manifest(merrilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Aldus is not apetalous. Patel is cheering. If Patel is cheering then Patel is apetalous. If something is cheering and apetalous then it is shed. If something is cheering and not continent then it is slummy. All dummy things are slummy. All continent things are squishy. If something is cheering and slummy then it is squishy. If something is shed then it is squishy. If something is continent and not shed then it is not dummy. Aldus is not shed.", "logic": "\nnot Apetalous(aldus)\nCheering(patel)\nCheering(patel) -> Apetalous(patel)\nforall x (Cheering(x) and Apetalous(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) and not Continent(x) -> Slummy(x))\nforall x (Dummy(x) -> Slummy(x))\nforall x (Continent(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) and Slummy(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Continent(x) and not Shed(x) -> not Dummy(x))\n\nnot Shed(aldus)\n\nforall x (Cheering(x) and Apetalous(x) -> Shed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Cate is not burled. Winifield is shrinkable. If Winifield is shrinkable then Winifield is burled. If something is shrinkable and burled then it is lubricious. If something is shrinkable and not dreary then it is fulgent. All fungicidal things are fulgent. All dreary things are statute. If something is shrinkable and fulgent then it is statute. If something is lubricious then it is statute. If something is dreary and not lubricious then it is not fungicidal. Winifield is fulgent.", "logic": "\nnot Burled(cate)\nShrinkable(winifield)\nShrinkable(winifield) -> Burled(winifield)\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) and Burled(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) and not Dreary(x) -> Fulgent(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Fulgent(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) and Fulgent(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) and not Lubricious(x) -> not Fungicidal(x))\n\nFulgent(winifield)\n\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) and not Dreary(x) -> Fulgent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Rickard is not smoky. Kylila is algolagnic. If Kylila is algolagnic then Kylila is smoky. If something is algolagnic and smoky then it is clubfooted. If something is algolagnic and not semestrial then it is southmost. All fortunate things are southmost. All semestrial things are near. If something is algolagnic and southmost then it is near. If something is clubfooted then it is near. If something is semestrial and not clubfooted then it is not fortunate. Rickard is not southmost.", "logic": "\nnot Smoky(rickard)\nAlgolagnic(kylila)\nAlgolagnic(kylila) -> Smoky(kylila)\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) and Smoky(x) -> Clubfooted(x))\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) and not Semestrial(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) -> Near(x))\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) and Southmost(x) -> Near(x))\nforall x (Clubfooted(x) -> Near(x))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) and not Clubfooted(x) -> not Fortunate(x))\n\nnot Southmost(rickard)\n\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) and not Semestrial(x) -> Southmost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Karmen is not smashed. Roanne is cynical. If Roanne is cynical then Roanne is smashed. If something is cynical and smashed then it is camphoric. If something is cynical and not afeared then it is sizable. All flowery things are sizable. All afeared things are pretorial. If something is cynical and sizable then it is pretorial. If something is camphoric then it is pretorial. If something is afeared and not camphoric then it is not flowery. Karmen is pretorial.", "logic": "\nnot Smashed(karmen)\nCynical(roanne)\nCynical(roanne) -> Smashed(roanne)\nforall x (Cynical(x) and Smashed(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nforall x (Cynical(x) and not Afeared(x) -> Sizable(x))\nforall x (Flowery(x) -> Sizable(x))\nforall x (Afeared(x) -> Pretorial(x))\nforall x (Cynical(x) and Sizable(x) -> Pretorial(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Pretorial(x))\nforall x (Afeared(x) and not Camphoric(x) -> not Flowery(x))\n\nPretorial(karmen)\n\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Pretorial(x)) <- forall x (Cynical(x) and Smashed(x) -> Camphoric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Jacinda is not visaged. Annora is merciless. If Annora is merciless then Annora is visaged. If something is merciless and visaged then it is bipolar. If something is merciless and not putrid then it is shifty. All ionized things are shifty. All putrid things are mangy. If something is merciless and shifty then it is mangy. If something is bipolar then it is mangy. If something is putrid and not bipolar then it is not ionized. Annora is not putrid.", "logic": "\nnot Visaged(jacinda)\nMerciless(annora)\nMerciless(annora) -> Visaged(annora)\nforall x (Merciless(x) and Visaged(x) -> Bipolar(x))\nforall x (Merciless(x) and not Putrid(x) -> Shifty(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Shifty(x))\nforall x (Putrid(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Merciless(x) and Shifty(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Bipolar(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Putrid(x) and not Bipolar(x) -> not Ionized(x))\n\nnot Putrid(annora)\n\nnot Putrid(annora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Colleen is not descending. Cate is indebted. If Cate is indebted then Cate is descending. If something is indebted and descending then it is bibliotic. If something is indebted and not sound then it is nonliving. All rachitic things are nonliving. All sound things are nonechoic. If something is indebted and nonliving then it is nonechoic. If something is bibliotic then it is nonechoic. If something is sound and not bibliotic then it is not rachitic. Colleen is rachitic.", "logic": "\nnot Descending(colleen)\nIndebted(cate)\nIndebted(cate) -> Descending(cate)\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Descending(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) and not Sound(x) -> Nonliving(x))\nforall x (Rachitic(x) -> Nonliving(x))\nforall x (Sound(x) -> Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Nonliving(x) -> Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) -> Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Sound(x) and not Bibliotic(x) -> not Rachitic(x))\n\nRachitic(colleen)\n\nRachitic(colleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Rozalin is not ravening. Floris is avowed. If Floris is avowed then Floris is ravening. If something is avowed and ravening then it is hassidic. If something is avowed and not wheaten then it is undulatory. All manky things are undulatory. All wheaten things are confused. If something is avowed and undulatory then it is confused. If something is hassidic then it is confused. If something is wheaten and not hassidic then it is not manky. Rozalin is not avowed.", "logic": "\nnot Ravening(rozalin)\nAvowed(floris)\nAvowed(floris) -> Ravening(floris)\nforall x (Avowed(x) and Ravening(x) -> Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Avowed(x) and not Wheaten(x) -> Undulatory(x))\nforall x (Manky(x) -> Undulatory(x))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) -> Confused(x))\nforall x (Avowed(x) and Undulatory(x) -> Confused(x))\nforall x (Hassidic(x) -> Confused(x))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) and not Hassidic(x) -> not Manky(x))\n\nnot Avowed(rozalin)\n\nnot Avowed(rozalin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Win is not uninformed. Cicily is general. If Cicily is general then Cicily is uninformed. If something is general and uninformed then it is jolly. If something is general and not stationary then it is reptilian. All wanted things are reptilian. All stationary things are felonious. If something is general and reptilian then it is felonious. If something is jolly then it is felonious. If something is stationary and not jolly then it is not wanted. Cicily is wanted.", "logic": "\nnot Uninformed(win)\nGeneral(cicily)\nGeneral(cicily) -> Uninformed(cicily)\nforall x (General(x) and Uninformed(x) -> Jolly(x))\nforall x (General(x) and not Stationary(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Wanted(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Stationary(x) -> Felonious(x))\nforall x (General(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Felonious(x))\nforall x (Jolly(x) -> Felonious(x))\nforall x (Stationary(x) and not Jolly(x) -> not Wanted(x))\n\nWanted(cicily)\n\nWanted(cicily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The martita is bombproof. Round things are not stodgy. Red, earthen things are stodgy. If the martita is not exothermic then the martita is bombproof. If something is bombproof then it is earthen. If the martita is stodgy and the martita is not exothermic then the martita is insouciant. If something is earthen then it is insouciant. The martita is bombproof.", "logic": "\nBombproof(martita)\nforall x (Exothermic(x) -> not Stodgy(x))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and Earthen(x) -> Stodgy(x))\nnot Exothermic(martita) -> Bombproof(martita)\nforall x (Bombproof(x) -> Earthen(x))\nStodgy(martita) and not Exothermic(martita) -> Insouciant(martita)\nforall x (Earthen(x) -> Insouciant(x))\n\nBombproof(martita)\n\ntherefore Bombproof(martita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The evvie is unknown. Round things are not plumate. Red, scornful things are plumate. If the evvie is not wanton then the evvie is unknown. If something is unknown then it is scornful. If the evvie is plumate and the evvie is not wanton then the evvie is untruthful. If something is scornful then it is untruthful. The evvie is not unknown.", "logic": "\nUnknown(evvie)\nforall x (Wanton(x) -> not Plumate(x))\nforall x (Untruthful(x) and Scornful(x) -> Plumate(x))\nnot Wanton(evvie) -> Unknown(evvie)\nforall x (Unknown(x) -> Scornful(x))\nPlumate(evvie) and not Wanton(evvie) -> Untruthful(evvie)\nforall x (Scornful(x) -> Untruthful(x))\n\nnot Unknown(evvie)\n\ntherefore Unknown(evvie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The donella is raptorial. Round things are not opponent. Red, crashing things are opponent. If the donella is not cycloidal then the donella is raptorial. If something is raptorial then it is crashing. If the donella is opponent and the donella is not cycloidal then the donella is torulose. If something is crashing then it is torulose. The donella is crashing.", "logic": "\nRaptorial(donella)\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) -> not Opponent(x))\nforall x (Torulose(x) and Crashing(x) -> Opponent(x))\nnot Cycloidal(donella) -> Raptorial(donella)\nforall x (Raptorial(x) -> Crashing(x))\nOpponent(donella) and not Cycloidal(donella) -> Torulose(donella)\nforall x (Crashing(x) -> Torulose(x))\n\nCrashing(donella)\n\nRaptorial(donella) and forall x (Raptorial(x) -> Crashing(x)) -> therefore Crashing(donella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The mischa is permeating. Round things are not implanted. Red, doleful things are implanted. If the mischa is not undamaged then the mischa is permeating. If something is permeating then it is doleful. If the mischa is implanted and the mischa is not undamaged then the mischa is trilobed. If something is doleful then it is trilobed. The mischa is not doleful.", "logic": "\nPermeating(mischa)\nforall x (Undamaged(x) -> not Implanted(x))\nforall x (Trilobed(x) and Doleful(x) -> Implanted(x))\nnot Undamaged(mischa) -> Permeating(mischa)\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Doleful(x))\nImplanted(mischa) and not Undamaged(mischa) -> Trilobed(mischa)\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Trilobed(x))\n\nnot Doleful(mischa)\n\nPermeating(mischa) and forall x (Permeating(x) -> Doleful(x)) -> therefore Doleful(mischa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The vaughan is insanitary. Round things are not susurrous. Red, peptic things are susurrous. If the vaughan is not sweetened then the vaughan is insanitary. If something is insanitary then it is peptic. If the vaughan is susurrous and the vaughan is not sweetened then the vaughan is unicuspid. If something is peptic then it is unicuspid. The vaughan is unicuspid.", "logic": "\nInsanitary(vaughan)\nforall x (Sweetened(x) -> not Susurrous(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) and Peptic(x) -> Susurrous(x))\nnot Sweetened(vaughan) -> Insanitary(vaughan)\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Peptic(x))\nSusurrous(vaughan) and not Sweetened(vaughan) -> Unicuspid(vaughan)\nforall x (Peptic(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\n\nUnicuspid(vaughan)\n\nInsanitary(vaughan) and forall x (Insanitary(x) -> Peptic(x)) -> therefore Peptic(vaughan) Peptic(vaughan) and forall x (Peptic(x) -> Unicuspid(x)) -> therefore Unicuspid(vaughan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The etta is unimpeded. Round things are not foliaged. Red, roman things are foliaged. If the etta is not axonal then the etta is unimpeded. If something is unimpeded then it is roman. If the etta is foliaged and the etta is not axonal then the etta is latest. If something is roman then it is latest. The etta is not latest.", "logic": "\nUnimpeded(etta)\nforall x (Axonal(x) -> not Foliaged(x))\nforall x (Latest(x) and Roman(x) -> Foliaged(x))\nnot Axonal(etta) -> Unimpeded(etta)\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) -> Roman(x))\nFoliaged(etta) and not Axonal(etta) -> Latest(etta)\nforall x (Roman(x) -> Latest(x))\n\nnot Latest(etta)\n\nUnimpeded(etta) and forall x (Unimpeded(x) -> Roman(x)) -> therefore Roman(etta) Roman(etta) and forall x (Roman(x) -> Latest(x)) -> therefore Latest(etta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The agace is nonmetal. Round things are not miserable. Red, pernicious things are miserable. If the agace is not eastward then the agace is nonmetal. If something is nonmetal then it is pernicious. If the agace is miserable and the agace is not eastward then the agace is copulative. If something is pernicious then it is copulative. The agace is miserable.", "logic": "\nNonmetal(agace)\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> not Miserable(x))\nforall x (Copulative(x) and Pernicious(x) -> Miserable(x))\nnot Eastward(agace) -> Nonmetal(agace)\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Pernicious(x))\nMiserable(agace) and not Eastward(agace) -> Copulative(agace)\nforall x (Pernicious(x) -> Copulative(x))\n\nMiserable(agace)\n\nNonmetal(agace) and forall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Pernicious(x)) -> therefore Pernicious(agace) Pernicious(agace) and forall x (Pernicious(x) -> Copulative(x)) -> therefore Copulative(agace) Nonmetal(agace) and forall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Pernicious(x)) -> therefore Pernicious(agace) Copulative(agace) and Pernicious(agace) and forall x (Copulative(x) and Pernicious(x) -> Miserable(x)) -> therefore Miserable(agace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The heidie is syrupy. Round things are not disjunct. Red, visible things are disjunct. If the heidie is not perfervid then the heidie is syrupy. If something is syrupy then it is visible. If the heidie is disjunct and the heidie is not perfervid then the heidie is perdurable. If something is visible then it is perdurable. The heidie is not disjunct.", "logic": "\nSyrupy(heidie)\nforall x (Perfervid(x) -> not Disjunct(x))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) and Visible(x) -> Disjunct(x))\nnot Perfervid(heidie) -> Syrupy(heidie)\nforall x (Syrupy(x) -> Visible(x))\nDisjunct(heidie) and not Perfervid(heidie) -> Perdurable(heidie)\nforall x (Visible(x) -> Perdurable(x))\n\nnot Disjunct(heidie)\n\nSyrupy(heidie) and forall x (Syrupy(x) -> Visible(x)) -> therefore Visible(heidie) Visible(heidie) and forall x (Visible(x) -> Perdurable(x)) -> therefore Perdurable(heidie) Syrupy(heidie) and forall x (Syrupy(x) -> Visible(x)) -> therefore Visible(heidie) Perdurable(heidie) and Visible(heidie) and forall x (Perdurable(x) and Visible(x) -> Disjunct(x)) -> therefore Disjunct(heidie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The carleigh is discarded. Round things are not catatonic. Red, iatrogenic things are catatonic. If the carleigh is not indefinite then the carleigh is discarded. If something is discarded then it is iatrogenic. If the carleigh is catatonic and the carleigh is not indefinite then the carleigh is blest. If something is iatrogenic then it is blest. The carleigh does not visit the carleigh.", "logic": "\nDiscarded(carleigh)\nforall x (Indefinite(x) -> not Catatonic(x))\nforall x (Blest(x) and Iatrogenic(x) -> Catatonic(x))\nnot Indefinite(carleigh) -> Discarded(carleigh)\nforall x (Discarded(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nCatatonic(carleigh) and not Indefinite(carleigh) -> Blest(carleigh)\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Blest(x))\n\nnot Visits(carleigh, carleigh)\n\nnot Visits(carleigh, carleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The benson is taillike. Round things are not vitalizing. Red, underclass things are vitalizing. If the benson is not liplike then the benson is taillike. If something is taillike then it is underclass. If the benson is vitalizing and the benson is not liplike then the benson is beaten. If something is underclass then it is beaten. The benson eats the benson.", "logic": "\nTaillike(benson)\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> not Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Beaten(x) and Underclass(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nnot Liplike(benson) -> Taillike(benson)\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Underclass(x))\nVitalizing(benson) and not Liplike(benson) -> Beaten(benson)\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Beaten(x))\n\nEats(benson, benson)\n\nEats(benson, benson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The virginia is sweptwing. Round things are not backmost. Red, stung things are backmost. If the virginia is not stagnant then the virginia is sweptwing. If something is sweptwing then it is stung. If the virginia is backmost and the virginia is not stagnant then the virginia is himalayan. If something is stung then it is himalayan. The virginia is not stagnant.", "logic": "\nSweptwing(virginia)\nforall x (Stagnant(x) -> not Backmost(x))\nforall x (Himalayan(x) and Stung(x) -> Backmost(x))\nnot Stagnant(virginia) -> Sweptwing(virginia)\nforall x (Sweptwing(x) -> Stung(x))\nBackmost(virginia) and not Stagnant(virginia) -> Himalayan(virginia)\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Himalayan(x))\n\nnot Stagnant(virginia)\n\nnot Stagnant(virginia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The magna is consuming. Round things are not pendulous. Red, milky things are pendulous. If the magna is not burlesque then the magna is consuming. If something is consuming then it is milky. If the magna is pendulous and the magna is not burlesque then the magna is anodyne. If something is milky then it is anodyne. The magna needs the magna.", "logic": "\nConsuming(magna)\nforall x (Burlesque(x) -> not Pendulous(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) and Milky(x) -> Pendulous(x))\nnot Burlesque(magna) -> Consuming(magna)\nforall x (Consuming(x) -> Milky(x))\nPendulous(magna) and not Burlesque(magna) -> Anodyne(magna)\nforall x (Milky(x) -> Anodyne(x))\n\nNeeds(magna, magna)\n\nNeeds(magna, magna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The patti is xcvi. The otes spotweld the patti. The wynne outrank the otes. If something outrank the patti then the patti outrank the otes. If something outrank the otes then it is understood. If the otes is sudanese and the otes is understood then the otes spotweld the patti. If something is annelidan and it coast the patti then the patti spotweld the otes. If something spotweld the patti then it outrank the patti. If something coast the wynne then it is annelidan. The otes spotweld the patti.", "logic": "\nXcvi(patti)\nSpotweld(otes, patti)\nOutrank(wynne, otes)\nforall x (Outrank(x, patti) -> Outrank(patti, otes))\nforall x (Outrank(x, otes) -> Understood(x))\nSudanese(otes) and Understood(otes) -> Spotweld(otes, patti)\nforall x (Annelidan(x) and Coast(x, patti) -> Spotweld(patti, otes))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, patti) -> Outrank(x, patti))\nforall x (Coast(x, wynne) -> Annelidan(x))\n\nSpotweld(otes, patti)\n\ntherefore Spotweld(otes, patti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The marlie is droopy. The aron geyser the marlie. The cleland bespeak the aron. If something bespeak the marlie then the marlie bespeak the aron. If something bespeak the aron then it is glacial. If the aron is reddened and the aron is glacial then the aron geyser the marlie. If something is developing and it jumpstart the marlie then the marlie geyser the aron. If something geyser the marlie then it bespeak the marlie. If something jumpstart the cleland then it is developing. The marlie is not droopy.", "logic": "\nDroopy(marlie)\nGeyser(aron, marlie)\nBespeak(cleland, aron)\nforall x (Bespeak(x, marlie) -> Bespeak(marlie, aron))\nforall x (Bespeak(x, aron) -> Glacial(x))\nReddened(aron) and Glacial(aron) -> Geyser(aron, marlie)\nforall x (Developing(x) and Jumpstart(x, marlie) -> Geyser(marlie, aron))\nforall x (Geyser(x, marlie) -> Bespeak(x, marlie))\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, cleland) -> Developing(x))\n\nnot Droopy(marlie)\n\ntherefore Droopy(marlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The amory is seventeen. The rodolphe unlive the amory. The shurwood bemock the rodolphe. If something bemock the amory then the amory bemock the rodolphe. If something bemock the rodolphe then it is cyanophyte. If the rodolphe is romish and the rodolphe is cyanophyte then the rodolphe unlive the amory. If something is soled and it stumble the amory then the amory unlive the rodolphe. If something unlive the amory then it bemock the amory. If something stumble the shurwood then it is soled. The rodolphe bemock the amory.", "logic": "\nSeventeen(amory)\nUnlive(rodolphe, amory)\nBemock(shurwood, rodolphe)\nforall x (Bemock(x, amory) -> Bemock(amory, rodolphe))\nforall x (Bemock(x, rodolphe) -> Cyanophyte(x))\nRomish(rodolphe) and Cyanophyte(rodolphe) -> Unlive(rodolphe, amory)\nforall x (Soled(x) and Stumble(x, amory) -> Unlive(amory, rodolphe))\nforall x (Unlive(x, amory) -> Bemock(x, amory))\nforall x (Stumble(x, shurwood) -> Soled(x))\n\nBemock(rodolphe, amory)\n\nUnlive(rodolphe, amory) and forall x (Unlive(x, amory) -> Bemock(x, amory)) -> therefore Bemock(rodolphe, amory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The ree is witty. The paige garble the ree. The vinita gibber the paige. If something gibber the ree then the ree gibber the paige. If something gibber the paige then it is petite. If the paige is rigged and the paige is petite then the paige garble the ree. If something is mortal and it cite the ree then the ree garble the paige. If something garble the ree then it gibber the ree. If something cite the vinita then it is mortal. The paige does not visit the ree.", "logic": "\nWitty(ree)\nGarble(paige, ree)\nGibber(vinita, paige)\nforall x (Gibber(x, ree) -> Gibber(ree, paige))\nforall x (Gibber(x, paige) -> Petite(x))\nRigged(paige) and Petite(paige) -> Garble(paige, ree)\nforall x (Mortal(x) and Cite(x, ree) -> Garble(ree, paige))\nforall x (Garble(x, ree) -> Gibber(x, ree))\nforall x (Cite(x, vinita) -> Mortal(x))\n\nnot Gibber(paige, ree)\n\nGarble(paige, ree) and forall x (Garble(x, ree) -> Gibber(x, ree)) -> therefore Gibber(paige, ree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The flo is tubby. The jessamine slight the flo. The hailey invigorate the jessamine. If something invigorate the flo then the flo invigorate the jessamine. If something invigorate the jessamine then it is wavelike. If the jessamine is damning and the jessamine is wavelike then the jessamine slight the flo. If something is aerated and it tampon the flo then the flo slight the jessamine. If something slight the flo then it invigorate the flo. If something tampon the hailey then it is aerated. The flo invigorate the jessamine.", "logic": "\nTubby(flo)\nSlight(jessamine, flo)\nInvigorate(hailey, jessamine)\nforall x (Invigorate(x, flo) -> Invigorate(flo, jessamine))\nforall x (Invigorate(x, jessamine) -> Wavelike(x))\nDamning(jessamine) and Wavelike(jessamine) -> Slight(jessamine, flo)\nforall x (Aerated(x) and Tampon(x, flo) -> Slight(flo, jessamine))\nforall x (Slight(x, flo) -> Invigorate(x, flo))\nforall x (Tampon(x, hailey) -> Aerated(x))\n\nInvigorate(flo, jessamine)\n\nSlight(jessamine, flo) and forall x (Slight(x, flo) -> Invigorate(x, flo)) -> therefore Invigorate(jessamine, flo) Invigorate(jessamine, flo) and forall x (Invigorate(x, flo) -> Invigorate(flo, jessamine)) -> therefore Invigorate(flo, jessamine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The larry is upturned. The jany pile the larry. The ina blight the jany. If something blight the larry then the larry blight the jany. If something blight the jany then it is crusty. If the jany is releasing and the jany is crusty then the jany pile the larry. If something is unhoped and it finagle the larry then the larry pile the jany. If something pile the larry then it blight the larry. If something finagle the ina then it is unhoped. The larry does not visit the jany.", "logic": "\nUpturned(larry)\nPile(jany, larry)\nBlight(ina, jany)\nforall x (Blight(x, larry) -> Blight(larry, jany))\nforall x (Blight(x, jany) -> Crusty(x))\nReleasing(jany) and Crusty(jany) -> Pile(jany, larry)\nforall x (Unhoped(x) and Finagle(x, larry) -> Pile(larry, jany))\nforall x (Pile(x, larry) -> Blight(x, larry))\nforall x (Finagle(x, ina) -> Unhoped(x))\n\nnot Blight(larry, jany)\n\nPile(jany, larry) and forall x (Pile(x, larry) -> Blight(x, larry)) -> therefore Blight(jany, larry) Blight(jany, larry) and forall x (Blight(x, larry) -> Blight(larry, jany)) -> therefore Blight(larry, jany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The tanney is antigenic. The godfry trade the tanney. The bethina telescope the godfry. If something telescope the tanney then the tanney telescope the godfry. If something telescope the godfry then it is nosy. If the godfry is sweetish and the godfry is nosy then the godfry trade the tanney. If something is adynamic and it click the tanney then the tanney trade the godfry. If something trade the tanney then it telescope the tanney. If something click the bethina then it is adynamic. The tanney is nosy.", "logic": "\nAntigenic(tanney)\nTrade(godfry, tanney)\nTelescope(bethina, godfry)\nforall x (Telescope(x, tanney) -> Telescope(tanney, godfry))\nforall x (Telescope(x, godfry) -> Nosy(x))\nSweetish(godfry) and Nosy(godfry) -> Trade(godfry, tanney)\nforall x (Adynamic(x) and Click(x, tanney) -> Trade(tanney, godfry))\nforall x (Trade(x, tanney) -> Telescope(x, tanney))\nforall x (Click(x, bethina) -> Adynamic(x))\n\nNosy(tanney)\n\nTrade(godfry, tanney) and forall x (Trade(x, tanney) -> Telescope(x, tanney)) -> therefore Telescope(godfry, tanney) Telescope(godfry, tanney) and forall x (Telescope(x, tanney) -> Telescope(tanney, godfry)) -> therefore Telescope(tanney, godfry) Telescope(tanney, godfry) and forall x (Telescope(x, godfry) -> Nosy(x)) -> therefore Nosy(tanney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The cacilia is akin. The farah fall the cacilia. The trey outnumber the farah. If something outnumber the cacilia then the cacilia outnumber the farah. If something outnumber the farah then it is thousandth. If the farah is lanate and the farah is thousandth then the farah fall the cacilia. If something is unquotable and it upchuck the cacilia then the cacilia fall the farah. If something fall the cacilia then it outnumber the cacilia. If something upchuck the trey then it is unquotable. The cacilia is not thousandth.", "logic": "\nAkin(cacilia)\nFall(farah, cacilia)\nOutnumber(trey, farah)\nforall x (Outnumber(x, cacilia) -> Outnumber(cacilia, farah))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, farah) -> Thousandth(x))\nLanate(farah) and Thousandth(farah) -> Fall(farah, cacilia)\nforall x (Unquotable(x) and Upchuck(x, cacilia) -> Fall(cacilia, farah))\nforall x (Fall(x, cacilia) -> Outnumber(x, cacilia))\nforall x (Upchuck(x, trey) -> Unquotable(x))\n\nnot Thousandth(cacilia)\n\nFall(farah, cacilia) and forall x (Fall(x, cacilia) -> Outnumber(x, cacilia)) -> therefore Outnumber(farah, cacilia) Outnumber(farah, cacilia) and forall x (Outnumber(x, cacilia) -> Outnumber(cacilia, farah)) -> therefore Outnumber(cacilia, farah) Outnumber(cacilia, farah) and forall x (Outnumber(x, farah) -> Thousandth(x)) -> therefore Thousandth(cacilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The isabelle is perdurable. The lind reeve the isabelle. The bennett slum the lind. If something slum the isabelle then the isabelle slum the lind. If something slum the lind then it is desegrated. If the lind is unmovable and the lind is desegrated then the lind reeve the isabelle. If something is decent and it hole the isabelle then the isabelle reeve the lind. If something reeve the isabelle then it slum the isabelle. If something hole the bennett then it is decent. The isabelle is not decent.", "logic": "\nPerdurable(isabelle)\nReeve(lind, isabelle)\nSlum(bennett, lind)\nforall x (Slum(x, isabelle) -> Slum(isabelle, lind))\nforall x (Slum(x, lind) -> Desegrated(x))\nUnmovable(lind) and Desegrated(lind) -> Reeve(lind, isabelle)\nforall x (Decent(x) and Hole(x, isabelle) -> Reeve(isabelle, lind))\nforall x (Reeve(x, isabelle) -> Slum(x, isabelle))\nforall x (Hole(x, bennett) -> Decent(x))\n\nnot Decent(isabelle)\n\nforall x (Hole(x, bennett) -> Decent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The park is edentulate. The christie atrophy the park. The gae espouse the christie. If something espouse the park then the park espouse the christie. If something espouse the christie then it is virtuoso. If the christie is tenfold and the christie is virtuoso then the christie atrophy the park. If something is buff and it sport the park then the park atrophy the christie. If something atrophy the park then it espouse the park. If something sport the gae then it is buff. The park atrophy the christie.", "logic": "\nEdentulate(park)\nAtrophy(christie, park)\nEspouse(gae, christie)\nforall x (Espouse(x, park) -> Espouse(park, christie))\nforall x (Espouse(x, christie) -> Virtuoso(x))\nTenfold(christie) and Virtuoso(christie) -> Atrophy(christie, park)\nforall x (Buff(x) and Sport(x, park) -> Atrophy(park, christie))\nforall x (Atrophy(x, park) -> Espouse(x, park))\nforall x (Sport(x, gae) -> Buff(x))\n\nAtrophy(park, christie)\n\nforall x (Buff(x) and Sport(x, park) -> Atrophy(park, christie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The sophey is legible. The hatty migrate the sophey. The evania blanch the hatty. If something blanch the sophey then the sophey blanch the hatty. If something blanch the hatty then it is staring. If the hatty is hoydenish and the hatty is staring then the hatty migrate the sophey. If something is nonwoody and it macadamise the sophey then the sophey migrate the hatty. If something migrate the sophey then it blanch the sophey. If something macadamise the evania then it is nonwoody. The evania is not nonwoody.", "logic": "\nLegible(sophey)\nMigrate(hatty, sophey)\nBlanch(evania, hatty)\nforall x (Blanch(x, sophey) -> Blanch(sophey, hatty))\nforall x (Blanch(x, hatty) -> Staring(x))\nHoydenish(hatty) and Staring(hatty) -> Migrate(hatty, sophey)\nforall x (Nonwoody(x) and Macadamise(x, sophey) -> Migrate(sophey, hatty))\nforall x (Migrate(x, sophey) -> Blanch(x, sophey))\nforall x (Macadamise(x, evania) -> Nonwoody(x))\n\nnot Nonwoody(evania)\n\nforall x (Macadamise(x, evania) -> Nonwoody(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The madelon is presbyopic. The jeffrey rivet the madelon. The emmit bemock the jeffrey. If something bemock the madelon then the madelon bemock the jeffrey. If something bemock the jeffrey then it is guatemalan. If the jeffrey is cruel and the jeffrey is guatemalan then the jeffrey rivet the madelon. If something is prying and it lust the madelon then the madelon rivet the jeffrey. If something rivet the madelon then it bemock the madelon. If something lust the emmit then it is prying. The jeffrey is prying.", "logic": "\nPresbyopic(madelon)\nRivet(jeffrey, madelon)\nBemock(emmit, jeffrey)\nforall x (Bemock(x, madelon) -> Bemock(madelon, jeffrey))\nforall x (Bemock(x, jeffrey) -> Guatemalan(x))\nCruel(jeffrey) and Guatemalan(jeffrey) -> Rivet(jeffrey, madelon)\nforall x (Prying(x) and Lust(x, madelon) -> Rivet(madelon, jeffrey))\nforall x (Rivet(x, madelon) -> Bemock(x, madelon))\nforall x (Lust(x, emmit) -> Prying(x))\n\nPrying(jeffrey)\n\nforall x (Lust(x, emmit) -> Prying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The adeline is palatable. The ransom avert the adeline. The robbin conk the ransom. If something conk the adeline then the adeline conk the ransom. If something conk the ransom then it is donnean. If the ransom is curatorial and the ransom is donnean then the ransom avert the adeline. If something is gushing and it transfix the adeline then the adeline avert the ransom. If something avert the adeline then it conk the adeline. If something transfix the robbin then it is gushing. The adeline is not kind.", "logic": "\nPalatable(adeline)\nAvert(ransom, adeline)\nConk(robbin, ransom)\nforall x (Conk(x, adeline) -> Conk(adeline, ransom))\nforall x (Conk(x, ransom) -> Donnean(x))\nCuratorial(ransom) and Donnean(ransom) -> Avert(ransom, adeline)\nforall x (Gushing(x) and Transfix(x, adeline) -> Avert(adeline, ransom))\nforall x (Avert(x, adeline) -> Conk(x, adeline))\nforall x (Transfix(x, robbin) -> Gushing(x))\n\nnot Kind(adeline)\n\nnot Kind(adeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The daveen is anaphasic. The allissa model the daveen. The jotham shit the allissa. If something shit the daveen then the daveen shit the allissa. If something shit the allissa then it is fraught. If the allissa is assisted and the allissa is fraught then the allissa model the daveen. If something is unborn and it habit the daveen then the daveen model the allissa. If something model the daveen then it shit the daveen. If something habit the jotham then it is unborn. The daveen shit the jotham.", "logic": "\nAnaphasic(daveen)\nModel(allissa, daveen)\nShit(jotham, allissa)\nforall x (Shit(x, daveen) -> Shit(daveen, allissa))\nforall x (Shit(x, allissa) -> Fraught(x))\nAssisted(allissa) and Fraught(allissa) -> Model(allissa, daveen)\nforall x (Unborn(x) and Habit(x, daveen) -> Model(daveen, allissa))\nforall x (Model(x, daveen) -> Shit(x, daveen))\nforall x (Habit(x, jotham) -> Unborn(x))\n\nShit(daveen, jotham)\n\nShit(daveen, jotham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The tucker is unshakable. The beverlee birle the tucker. The saunder process the beverlee. If something process the tucker then the tucker process the beverlee. If something process the beverlee then it is arabian. If the beverlee is amerciable and the beverlee is arabian then the beverlee birle the tucker. If something is unblessed and it deaerate the tucker then the tucker birle the beverlee. If something birle the tucker then it process the tucker. If something deaerate the saunder then it is unblessed. The beverlee does not see the tucker.", "logic": "\nUnshakable(tucker)\nBirle(beverlee, tucker)\nProcess(saunder, beverlee)\nforall x (Process(x, tucker) -> Process(tucker, beverlee))\nforall x (Process(x, beverlee) -> Arabian(x))\nAmerciable(beverlee) and Arabian(beverlee) -> Birle(beverlee, tucker)\nforall x (Unblessed(x) and Deaerate(x, tucker) -> Birle(tucker, beverlee))\nforall x (Birle(x, tucker) -> Process(x, tucker))\nforall x (Deaerate(x, saunder) -> Unblessed(x))\n\nnot Deaerate(beverlee, tucker)\n\nnot Deaerate(beverlee, tucker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The ofella is impromptu. The phineas repercuss the ofella. The clio wean the phineas. If something wean the ofella then the ofella wean the phineas. If something wean the phineas then it is milklike. If the phineas is frail and the phineas is milklike then the phineas repercuss the ofella. If something is categoric and it lexicalise the ofella then the ofella repercuss the phineas. If something repercuss the ofella then it wean the ofella. If something lexicalise the clio then it is categoric. The clio is kind.", "logic": "\nImpromptu(ofella)\nRepercuss(phineas, ofella)\nWean(clio, phineas)\nforall x (Wean(x, ofella) -> Wean(ofella, phineas))\nforall x (Wean(x, phineas) -> Milklike(x))\nFrail(phineas) and Milklike(phineas) -> Repercuss(phineas, ofella)\nforall x (Categoric(x) and Lexicalise(x, ofella) -> Repercuss(ofella, phineas))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, ofella) -> Wean(x, ofella))\nforall x (Lexicalise(x, clio) -> Categoric(x))\n\nKind(clio)\n\nKind(clio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "Jeffie is unedifying. Jeffie is marbleized. Jeffie is flavourous. All aminic, flavourous things are uncooked. If something is unedifying and geared then it is uncooked. All nonmodern, flavourous things are marbleized. If something is marbleized and aminic then it is unedifying. If something is marbleized then it is nonmodern. All nonmodern things are aminic. Big, nonmodern things are flavourous. If Jeffie is aminic and Jeffie is not marbleized then Jeffie is uncooked. Jeffie is marbleized.", "logic": "\nUnedifying(jeffie)\nMarbleized(jeffie)\nFlavourous(jeffie)\nforall x (Aminic(x) and Flavourous(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Unedifying(x) and Geared(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Nonmodern(x) and Flavourous(x) -> Marbleized(x))\nforall x (Marbleized(x) and Aminic(x) -> Unedifying(x))\nforall x (Marbleized(x) -> Nonmodern(x))\nforall x (Nonmodern(x) -> Aminic(x))\nforall x (Unedifying(x) and Nonmodern(x) -> Flavourous(x))\nAminic(jeffie) and not Marbleized(jeffie) -> Uncooked(jeffie)\n\nMarbleized(jeffie)\n\ntherefore Marbleized(jeffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Riccardo is retiring. Riccardo is embolic. Riccardo is orientated. All absolutist, orientated things are submersed. If something is retiring and asphaltic then it is submersed. All camphoric, orientated things are embolic. If something is embolic and absolutist then it is retiring. If something is embolic then it is camphoric. All camphoric things are absolutist. Big, camphoric things are orientated. If Riccardo is absolutist and Riccardo is not embolic then Riccardo is submersed. Riccardo is not embolic.", "logic": "\nRetiring(riccardo)\nEmbolic(riccardo)\nOrientated(riccardo)\nforall x (Absolutist(x) and Orientated(x) -> Submersed(x))\nforall x (Retiring(x) and Asphaltic(x) -> Submersed(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) and Orientated(x) -> Embolic(x))\nforall x (Embolic(x) and Absolutist(x) -> Retiring(x))\nforall x (Embolic(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Retiring(x) and Camphoric(x) -> Orientated(x))\nAbsolutist(riccardo) and not Embolic(riccardo) -> Submersed(riccardo)\n\nnot Embolic(riccardo)\n\ntherefore Embolic(riccardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Sheridan is enchanted. Sheridan is warning. Sheridan is drooping. All lifelike, drooping things are efficient. If something is enchanted and dilute then it is efficient. All mental, drooping things are warning. If something is warning and lifelike then it is enchanted. If something is warning then it is mental. All mental things are lifelike. Big, mental things are drooping. If Sheridan is lifelike and Sheridan is not warning then Sheridan is efficient. Sheridan is mental.", "logic": "\nEnchanted(sheridan)\nWarning(sheridan)\nDrooping(sheridan)\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Drooping(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) and Dilute(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) and Drooping(x) -> Warning(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and Lifelike(x) -> Enchanted(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Mental(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) -> Lifelike(x))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) and Mental(x) -> Drooping(x))\nLifelike(sheridan) and not Warning(sheridan) -> Efficient(sheridan)\n\nMental(sheridan)\n\nWarning(sheridan) and forall x (Warning(x) -> Mental(x)) -> therefore Mental(sheridan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Renie is assonant. Renie is ovoid. Renie is hyoid. All oversize, hyoid things are sequined. If something is assonant and diamantine then it is sequined. All brambly, hyoid things are ovoid. If something is ovoid and oversize then it is assonant. If something is ovoid then it is brambly. All brambly things are oversize. Big, brambly things are hyoid. If Renie is oversize and Renie is not ovoid then Renie is sequined. Renie is not brambly.", "logic": "\nAssonant(renie)\nOvoid(renie)\nHyoid(renie)\nforall x (Oversize(x) and Hyoid(x) -> Sequined(x))\nforall x (Assonant(x) and Diamantine(x) -> Sequined(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) and Hyoid(x) -> Ovoid(x))\nforall x (Ovoid(x) and Oversize(x) -> Assonant(x))\nforall x (Ovoid(x) -> Brambly(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) -> Oversize(x))\nforall x (Assonant(x) and Brambly(x) -> Hyoid(x))\nOversize(renie) and not Ovoid(renie) -> Sequined(renie)\n\nnot Brambly(renie)\n\nOvoid(renie) and forall x (Ovoid(x) -> Brambly(x)) -> therefore Brambly(renie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Gizela is larval. Gizela is moot. Gizela is anserine. All amygdaline, anserine things are precordial. If something is larval and dressed then it is precordial. All taxonomic, anserine things are moot. If something is moot and amygdaline then it is larval. If something is moot then it is taxonomic. All taxonomic things are amygdaline. Big, taxonomic things are anserine. If Gizela is amygdaline and Gizela is not moot then Gizela is precordial. Gizela is amygdaline.", "logic": "\nLarval(gizela)\nMoot(gizela)\nAnserine(gizela)\nforall x (Amygdaline(x) and Anserine(x) -> Precordial(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) and Dressed(x) -> Precordial(x))\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) and Anserine(x) -> Moot(x))\nforall x (Moot(x) and Amygdaline(x) -> Larval(x))\nforall x (Moot(x) -> Taxonomic(x))\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) and Taxonomic(x) -> Anserine(x))\nAmygdaline(gizela) and not Moot(gizela) -> Precordial(gizela)\n\nAmygdaline(gizela)\n\nMoot(gizela) and forall x (Moot(x) -> Taxonomic(x)) -> therefore Taxonomic(gizela) Taxonomic(gizela) and forall x (Taxonomic(x) -> Amygdaline(x)) -> therefore Amygdaline(gizela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Terza is singhalese. Terza is potty. Terza is grungy. All stochastic, grungy things are rising. If something is singhalese and delightful then it is rising. All basaltic, grungy things are potty. If something is potty and stochastic then it is singhalese. If something is potty then it is basaltic. All basaltic things are stochastic. Big, basaltic things are grungy. If Terza is stochastic and Terza is not potty then Terza is rising. Terza is not stochastic.", "logic": "\nSinghalese(terza)\nPotty(terza)\nGrungy(terza)\nforall x (Stochastic(x) and Grungy(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Singhalese(x) and Delightful(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Grungy(x) -> Potty(x))\nforall x (Potty(x) and Stochastic(x) -> Singhalese(x))\nforall x (Potty(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) -> Stochastic(x))\nforall x (Singhalese(x) and Basaltic(x) -> Grungy(x))\nStochastic(terza) and not Potty(terza) -> Rising(terza)\n\nnot Stochastic(terza)\n\nPotty(terza) and forall x (Potty(x) -> Basaltic(x)) -> therefore Basaltic(terza) Basaltic(terza) and forall x (Basaltic(x) -> Stochastic(x)) -> therefore Stochastic(terza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Bobine is evaporated. Bobine is pondering. Bobine is beloved. All many, beloved things are improvable. If something is evaporated and strong then it is improvable. All eroded, beloved things are pondering. If something is pondering and many then it is evaporated. If something is pondering then it is eroded. All eroded things are many. Big, eroded things are beloved. If Bobine is many and Bobine is not pondering then Bobine is improvable. Bobine is improvable.", "logic": "\nEvaporated(bobine)\nPondering(bobine)\nBeloved(bobine)\nforall x (Many(x) and Beloved(x) -> Improvable(x))\nforall x (Evaporated(x) and Strong(x) -> Improvable(x))\nforall x (Eroded(x) and Beloved(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Pondering(x) and Many(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Eroded(x) -> Many(x))\nforall x (Evaporated(x) and Eroded(x) -> Beloved(x))\nMany(bobine) and not Pondering(bobine) -> Improvable(bobine)\n\nImprovable(bobine)\n\nPondering(bobine) and forall x (Pondering(x) -> Eroded(x)) -> therefore Eroded(bobine) Eroded(bobine) and forall x (Eroded(x) -> Many(x)) -> therefore Many(bobine) Many(bobine) and Beloved(bobine) and forall x (Many(x) and Beloved(x) -> Improvable(x)) -> therefore Improvable(bobine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Dea is compulsive. Dea is inactive. Dea is unbigoted. All foliose, unbigoted things are perceptive. If something is compulsive and swinging then it is perceptive. All outlying, unbigoted things are inactive. If something is inactive and foliose then it is compulsive. If something is inactive then it is outlying. All outlying things are foliose. Big, outlying things are unbigoted. If Dea is foliose and Dea is not inactive then Dea is perceptive. Dea is not perceptive.", "logic": "\nCompulsive(dea)\nInactive(dea)\nUnbigoted(dea)\nforall x (Foliose(x) and Unbigoted(x) -> Perceptive(x))\nforall x (Compulsive(x) and Swinging(x) -> Perceptive(x))\nforall x (Outlying(x) and Unbigoted(x) -> Inactive(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) and Foliose(x) -> Compulsive(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Outlying(x) -> Foliose(x))\nforall x (Compulsive(x) and Outlying(x) -> Unbigoted(x))\nFoliose(dea) and not Inactive(dea) -> Perceptive(dea)\n\nnot Perceptive(dea)\n\nInactive(dea) and forall x (Inactive(x) -> Outlying(x)) -> therefore Outlying(dea) Outlying(dea) and forall x (Outlying(x) -> Foliose(x)) -> therefore Foliose(dea) Foliose(dea) and Unbigoted(dea) and forall x (Foliose(x) and Unbigoted(x) -> Perceptive(x)) -> therefore Perceptive(dea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "The cindee clatter the chas. The chas bluster the hilde. The stesha clatter the chas. The stesha bluster the chas. The hilde is crotchety. The hilde water the stesha. The hilde bluster the chas. If something is crotchety then it bluster the stesha. If something is ceylonese and rightmost then it clatter the cindee. If something is crotchety and it bluster the stesha then it clatter the hilde. If the hilde clatter the cindee and the hilde clatter the stesha then the stesha water the cindee. If something water the chas then it water the cindee. If something bluster the stesha and it clatter the hilde then it is pedigreed. The chas bluster the hilde.", "logic": "\nClatter(cindee, chas)\nBluster(chas, hilde)\nClatter(stesha, chas)\nBluster(stesha, chas)\nCrotchety(hilde)\nWater(hilde, stesha)\nBluster(hilde, chas)\nforall x (Crotchety(x) -> Bluster(x, stesha))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) and Rightmost(x) -> Clatter(x, cindee))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Bluster(x, stesha) -> Clatter(x, hilde))\nClatter(hilde, cindee) and Clatter(hilde, stesha) -> Water(stesha, cindee)\nforall x (Water(x, chas) -> Water(x, cindee))\nforall x (Bluster(x, stesha) and Clatter(x, hilde) -> Pedigreed(x))\n\nBluster(chas, hilde)\n\ntherefore Bluster(chas, hilde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The lelia slather the yehudi. The yehudi consummate the wilone. The kirk slather the yehudi. The kirk consummate the yehudi. The wilone is various. The wilone compart the kirk. The wilone consummate the yehudi. If something is various then it consummate the kirk. If something is grisly and unapparent then it slather the lelia. If something is various and it consummate the kirk then it slather the wilone. If the wilone slather the lelia and the wilone slather the kirk then the kirk compart the lelia. If something compart the yehudi then it compart the lelia. If something consummate the kirk and it slather the wilone then it is presbyopic. The kirk does not eat the yehudi.", "logic": "\nSlather(lelia, yehudi)\nConsummate(yehudi, wilone)\nSlather(kirk, yehudi)\nConsummate(kirk, yehudi)\nVarious(wilone)\nCompart(wilone, kirk)\nConsummate(wilone, yehudi)\nforall x (Various(x) -> Consummate(x, kirk))\nforall x (Grisly(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Slather(x, lelia))\nforall x (Various(x) and Consummate(x, kirk) -> Slather(x, wilone))\nSlather(wilone, lelia) and Slather(wilone, kirk) -> Compart(kirk, lelia)\nforall x (Compart(x, yehudi) -> Compart(x, lelia))\nforall x (Consummate(x, kirk) and Slather(x, wilone) -> Presbyopic(x))\n\nnot Slather(kirk, yehudi)\n\ntherefore Slather(kirk, yehudi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The giana divulge the opal. The opal juggle the rustie. The keefe divulge the opal. The keefe juggle the opal. The rustie is carious. The rustie legitimise the keefe. The rustie juggle the opal. If something is carious then it juggle the keefe. If something is uncreased and profitless then it divulge the giana. If something is carious and it juggle the keefe then it divulge the rustie. If the rustie divulge the giana and the rustie divulge the keefe then the keefe legitimise the giana. If something legitimise the opal then it legitimise the giana. If something juggle the keefe and it divulge the rustie then it is flecked. The rustie juggle the keefe.", "logic": "\nDivulge(giana, opal)\nJuggle(opal, rustie)\nDivulge(keefe, opal)\nJuggle(keefe, opal)\nCarious(rustie)\nLegitimise(rustie, keefe)\nJuggle(rustie, opal)\nforall x (Carious(x) -> Juggle(x, keefe))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Profitless(x) -> Divulge(x, giana))\nforall x (Carious(x) and Juggle(x, keefe) -> Divulge(x, rustie))\nDivulge(rustie, giana) and Divulge(rustie, keefe) -> Legitimise(keefe, giana)\nforall x (Legitimise(x, opal) -> Legitimise(x, giana))\nforall x (Juggle(x, keefe) and Divulge(x, rustie) -> Flecked(x))\n\nJuggle(rustie, keefe)\n\nCarious(rustie) and forall x (Carious(x) -> Juggle(x, keefe)) -> therefore Juggle(rustie, keefe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The garrot chop the penn. The penn sexualize the alfredo. The bruno chop the penn. The bruno sexualize the penn. The alfredo is tactful. The alfredo measure the bruno. The alfredo sexualize the penn. If something is tactful then it sexualize the bruno. If something is insolent and wild then it chop the garrot. If something is tactful and it sexualize the bruno then it chop the alfredo. If the alfredo chop the garrot and the alfredo chop the bruno then the bruno measure the garrot. If something measure the penn then it measure the garrot. If something sexualize the bruno and it chop the alfredo then it is despised. The alfredo does not need the bruno.", "logic": "\nChop(garrot, penn)\nSexualize(penn, alfredo)\nChop(bruno, penn)\nSexualize(bruno, penn)\nTactful(alfredo)\nMeasure(alfredo, bruno)\nSexualize(alfredo, penn)\nforall x (Tactful(x) -> Sexualize(x, bruno))\nforall x (Insolent(x) and Wild(x) -> Chop(x, garrot))\nforall x (Tactful(x) and Sexualize(x, bruno) -> Chop(x, alfredo))\nChop(alfredo, garrot) and Chop(alfredo, bruno) -> Measure(bruno, garrot)\nforall x (Measure(x, penn) -> Measure(x, garrot))\nforall x (Sexualize(x, bruno) and Chop(x, alfredo) -> Despised(x))\n\nnot Sexualize(alfredo, bruno)\n\nTactful(alfredo) and forall x (Tactful(x) -> Sexualize(x, bruno)) -> therefore Sexualize(alfredo, bruno)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The allis outvie the linnie. The linnie interact the tabina. The natala outvie the linnie. The natala interact the linnie. The tabina is completing. The tabina locomote the natala. The tabina interact the linnie. If something is completing then it interact the natala. If something is plumbic and converse then it outvie the allis. If something is completing and it interact the natala then it outvie the tabina. If the tabina outvie the allis and the tabina outvie the natala then the natala locomote the allis. If something locomote the linnie then it locomote the allis. If something interact the natala and it outvie the tabina then it is misogynous. The tabina outvie the tabina.", "logic": "\nOutvie(allis, linnie)\nInteract(linnie, tabina)\nOutvie(natala, linnie)\nInteract(natala, linnie)\nCompleting(tabina)\nLocomote(tabina, natala)\nInteract(tabina, linnie)\nforall x (Completing(x) -> Interact(x, natala))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) and Converse(x) -> Outvie(x, allis))\nforall x (Completing(x) and Interact(x, natala) -> Outvie(x, tabina))\nOutvie(tabina, allis) and Outvie(tabina, natala) -> Locomote(natala, allis)\nforall x (Locomote(x, linnie) -> Locomote(x, allis))\nforall x (Interact(x, natala) and Outvie(x, tabina) -> Misogynous(x))\n\nOutvie(tabina, tabina)\n\nCompleting(tabina) and forall x (Completing(x) -> Interact(x, natala)) -> therefore Interact(tabina, natala) Completing(tabina) and Interact(tabina, natala) and forall x (Completing(x) and Interact(x, natala) -> Outvie(x, tabina)) -> therefore Outvie(tabina, tabina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The valina oppugn the ignacius. The ignacius frown the daren. The reggie oppugn the ignacius. The reggie frown the ignacius. The daren is filmable. The daren paint the reggie. The daren frown the ignacius. If something is filmable then it frown the reggie. If something is crotchety and bronzy then it oppugn the valina. If something is filmable and it frown the reggie then it oppugn the daren. If the daren oppugn the valina and the daren oppugn the reggie then the reggie paint the valina. If something paint the ignacius then it paint the valina. If something frown the reggie and it oppugn the daren then it is newsworthy. The daren does not eat the daren.", "logic": "\nOppugn(valina, ignacius)\nFrown(ignacius, daren)\nOppugn(reggie, ignacius)\nFrown(reggie, ignacius)\nFilmable(daren)\nPaint(daren, reggie)\nFrown(daren, ignacius)\nforall x (Filmable(x) -> Frown(x, reggie))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Oppugn(x, valina))\nforall x (Filmable(x) and Frown(x, reggie) -> Oppugn(x, daren))\nOppugn(daren, valina) and Oppugn(daren, reggie) -> Paint(reggie, valina)\nforall x (Paint(x, ignacius) -> Paint(x, valina))\nforall x (Frown(x, reggie) and Oppugn(x, daren) -> Newsworthy(x))\n\nnot Oppugn(daren, daren)\n\nFilmable(daren) and forall x (Filmable(x) -> Frown(x, reggie)) -> therefore Frown(daren, reggie) Filmable(daren) and Frown(daren, reggie) and forall x (Filmable(x) and Frown(x, reggie) -> Oppugn(x, daren)) -> therefore Oppugn(daren, daren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The malissa adduct the carmelle. The carmelle falter the jill. The giavani adduct the carmelle. The giavani falter the carmelle. The jill is runproof. The jill institute the giavani. The jill falter the carmelle. If something is runproof then it falter the giavani. If something is webbed and dormie then it adduct the malissa. If something is runproof and it falter the giavani then it adduct the jill. If the jill adduct the malissa and the jill adduct the giavani then the giavani institute the malissa. If something institute the carmelle then it institute the malissa. If something falter the giavani and it adduct the jill then it is hydraulic. The jill is hydraulic.", "logic": "\nAdduct(malissa, carmelle)\nFalter(carmelle, jill)\nAdduct(giavani, carmelle)\nFalter(giavani, carmelle)\nRunproof(jill)\nInstitute(jill, giavani)\nFalter(jill, carmelle)\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Falter(x, giavani))\nforall x (Webbed(x) and Dormie(x) -> Adduct(x, malissa))\nforall x (Runproof(x) and Falter(x, giavani) -> Adduct(x, jill))\nAdduct(jill, malissa) and Adduct(jill, giavani) -> Institute(giavani, malissa)\nforall x (Institute(x, carmelle) -> Institute(x, malissa))\nforall x (Falter(x, giavani) and Adduct(x, jill) -> Hydraulic(x))\n\nHydraulic(jill)\n\nRunproof(jill) and forall x (Runproof(x) -> Falter(x, giavani)) -> therefore Falter(jill, giavani) Runproof(jill) and forall x (Runproof(x) -> Falter(x, giavani)) -> therefore Falter(jill, giavani) Runproof(jill) and Falter(jill, giavani) and forall x (Runproof(x) and Falter(x, giavani) -> Adduct(x, jill)) -> therefore Adduct(jill, jill) Falter(jill, giavani) and Adduct(jill, jill) and forall x (Falter(x, giavani) and Adduct(x, jill) -> Hydraulic(x)) -> therefore Hydraulic(jill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The joseph overbid the griswold. The griswold scramble the sibella. The damon overbid the griswold. The damon scramble the griswold. The sibella is unshoed. The sibella croon the damon. The sibella scramble the griswold. If something is unshoed then it scramble the damon. If something is landed and durable then it overbid the joseph. If something is unshoed and it scramble the damon then it overbid the sibella. If the sibella overbid the joseph and the sibella overbid the damon then the damon croon the joseph. If something croon the griswold then it croon the joseph. If something scramble the damon and it overbid the sibella then it is unfocused. The sibella is not unfocused.", "logic": "\nOverbid(joseph, griswold)\nScramble(griswold, sibella)\nOverbid(damon, griswold)\nScramble(damon, griswold)\nUnshoed(sibella)\nCroon(sibella, damon)\nScramble(sibella, griswold)\nforall x (Unshoed(x) -> Scramble(x, damon))\nforall x (Landed(x) and Durable(x) -> Overbid(x, joseph))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) and Scramble(x, damon) -> Overbid(x, sibella))\nOverbid(sibella, joseph) and Overbid(sibella, damon) -> Croon(damon, joseph)\nforall x (Croon(x, griswold) -> Croon(x, joseph))\nforall x (Scramble(x, damon) and Overbid(x, sibella) -> Unfocused(x))\n\nnot Unfocused(sibella)\n\nUnshoed(sibella) and forall x (Unshoed(x) -> Scramble(x, damon)) -> therefore Scramble(sibella, damon) Unshoed(sibella) and forall x (Unshoed(x) -> Scramble(x, damon)) -> therefore Scramble(sibella, damon) Unshoed(sibella) and Scramble(sibella, damon) and forall x (Unshoed(x) and Scramble(x, damon) -> Overbid(x, sibella)) -> therefore Overbid(sibella, sibella) Scramble(sibella, damon) and Overbid(sibella, sibella) and forall x (Scramble(x, damon) and Overbid(x, sibella) -> Unfocused(x)) -> therefore Unfocused(sibella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The sheffie whiten the cher. The cher lose the lorene. The garey whiten the cher. The garey lose the cher. The lorene is illegible. The lorene recurve the garey. The lorene lose the cher. If something is illegible then it lose the garey. If something is plantal and unimagined then it whiten the sheffie. If something is illegible and it lose the garey then it whiten the lorene. If the lorene whiten the sheffie and the lorene whiten the garey then the garey recurve the sheffie. If something recurve the cher then it recurve the sheffie. If something lose the garey and it whiten the lorene then it is behind. The sheffie does not eat the lorene.", "logic": "\nWhiten(sheffie, cher)\nLose(cher, lorene)\nWhiten(garey, cher)\nLose(garey, cher)\nIllegible(lorene)\nRecurve(lorene, garey)\nLose(lorene, cher)\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> Lose(x, garey))\nforall x (Plantal(x) and Unimagined(x) -> Whiten(x, sheffie))\nforall x (Illegible(x) and Lose(x, garey) -> Whiten(x, lorene))\nWhiten(lorene, sheffie) and Whiten(lorene, garey) -> Recurve(garey, sheffie)\nforall x (Recurve(x, cher) -> Recurve(x, sheffie))\nforall x (Lose(x, garey) and Whiten(x, lorene) -> Behind(x))\n\nnot Whiten(sheffie, lorene)\n\nforall x (Illegible(x) and Lose(x, garey) -> Whiten(x, lorene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The peria eroticize the sandie. The sandie ebonise the marshall. The ruddie eroticize the sandie. The ruddie ebonise the sandie. The marshall is bituminoid. The marshall plumb the ruddie. The marshall ebonise the sandie. If something is bituminoid then it ebonise the ruddie. If something is newborn and rejoicing then it eroticize the peria. If something is bituminoid and it ebonise the ruddie then it eroticize the marshall. If the marshall eroticize the peria and the marshall eroticize the ruddie then the ruddie plumb the peria. If something plumb the sandie then it plumb the peria. If something ebonise the ruddie and it eroticize the marshall then it is middle. The marshall plumb the peria.", "logic": "\nEroticize(peria, sandie)\nEbonise(sandie, marshall)\nEroticize(ruddie, sandie)\nEbonise(ruddie, sandie)\nBituminoid(marshall)\nPlumb(marshall, ruddie)\nEbonise(marshall, sandie)\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> Ebonise(x, ruddie))\nforall x (Newborn(x) and Rejoicing(x) -> Eroticize(x, peria))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) and Ebonise(x, ruddie) -> Eroticize(x, marshall))\nEroticize(marshall, peria) and Eroticize(marshall, ruddie) -> Plumb(ruddie, peria)\nforall x (Plumb(x, sandie) -> Plumb(x, peria))\nforall x (Ebonise(x, ruddie) and Eroticize(x, marshall) -> Middle(x))\n\nPlumb(marshall, peria)\n\nforall x (Plumb(x, sandie) -> Plumb(x, peria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The emelita alchemise the morse. The morse remit the sunshine. The myna alchemise the morse. The myna remit the morse. The sunshine is graceless. The sunshine depict the myna. The sunshine remit the morse. If something is graceless then it remit the myna. If something is melancholy and jelled then it alchemise the emelita. If something is graceless and it remit the myna then it alchemise the sunshine. If the sunshine alchemise the emelita and the sunshine alchemise the myna then the myna depict the emelita. If something depict the morse then it depict the emelita. If something remit the myna and it alchemise the sunshine then it is knockout. The emelita does not need the myna.", "logic": "\nAlchemise(emelita, morse)\nRemit(morse, sunshine)\nAlchemise(myna, morse)\nRemit(myna, morse)\nGraceless(sunshine)\nDepict(sunshine, myna)\nRemit(sunshine, morse)\nforall x (Graceless(x) -> Remit(x, myna))\nforall x (Melancholy(x) and Jelled(x) -> Alchemise(x, emelita))\nforall x (Graceless(x) and Remit(x, myna) -> Alchemise(x, sunshine))\nAlchemise(sunshine, emelita) and Alchemise(sunshine, myna) -> Depict(myna, emelita)\nforall x (Depict(x, morse) -> Depict(x, emelita))\nforall x (Remit(x, myna) and Alchemise(x, sunshine) -> Knockout(x))\n\nnot Remit(emelita, myna)\n\nforall x (Graceless(x) -> Remit(x, myna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The leo reseal the fredelia. The fredelia burglarise the trina. The guendolen reseal the fredelia. The guendolen burglarise the fredelia. The trina is bent. The trina burglarize the guendolen. The trina burglarise the fredelia. If something is bent then it burglarise the guendolen. If something is dreamy and pondering then it reseal the leo. If something is bent and it burglarise the guendolen then it reseal the trina. If the trina reseal the leo and the trina reseal the guendolen then the guendolen burglarize the leo. If something burglarize the fredelia then it burglarize the leo. If something burglarise the guendolen and it reseal the trina then it is undreamed. The fredelia reseal the trina.", "logic": "\nReseal(leo, fredelia)\nBurglarise(fredelia, trina)\nReseal(guendolen, fredelia)\nBurglarise(guendolen, fredelia)\nBent(trina)\nBurglarize(trina, guendolen)\nBurglarise(trina, fredelia)\nforall x (Bent(x) -> Burglarise(x, guendolen))\nforall x (Dreamy(x) and Pondering(x) -> Reseal(x, leo))\nforall x (Bent(x) and Burglarise(x, guendolen) -> Reseal(x, trina))\nReseal(trina, leo) and Reseal(trina, guendolen) -> Burglarize(guendolen, leo)\nforall x (Burglarize(x, fredelia) -> Burglarize(x, leo))\nforall x (Burglarise(x, guendolen) and Reseal(x, trina) -> Undreamed(x))\n\nReseal(fredelia, trina)\n\nforall x (Bent(x) and Burglarise(x, guendolen) -> Reseal(x, trina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The lonee conflict the standford. The standford forsake the jeanne. The marcy conflict the standford. The marcy forsake the standford. The jeanne is anaphasic. The jeanne solvate the marcy. The jeanne forsake the standford. If something is anaphasic then it forsake the marcy. If something is noncrucial and hesitating then it conflict the lonee. If something is anaphasic and it forsake the marcy then it conflict the jeanne. If the jeanne conflict the lonee and the jeanne conflict the marcy then the marcy solvate the lonee. If something solvate the standford then it solvate the lonee. If something forsake the marcy and it conflict the jeanne then it is hertzian. The standford is not noncrucial.", "logic": "\nConflict(lonee, standford)\nForsake(standford, jeanne)\nConflict(marcy, standford)\nForsake(marcy, standford)\nAnaphasic(jeanne)\nSolvate(jeanne, marcy)\nForsake(jeanne, standford)\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) -> Forsake(x, marcy))\nforall x (Noncrucial(x) and Hesitating(x) -> Conflict(x, lonee))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Forsake(x, marcy) -> Conflict(x, jeanne))\nConflict(jeanne, lonee) and Conflict(jeanne, marcy) -> Solvate(marcy, lonee)\nforall x (Solvate(x, standford) -> Solvate(x, lonee))\nforall x (Forsake(x, marcy) and Conflict(x, jeanne) -> Hertzian(x))\n\nnot Noncrucial(standford)\n\nnot Noncrucial(standford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The leroy loiter the jobie. The jobie miter the sada. The adorne loiter the jobie. The adorne miter the jobie. The sada is blotched. The sada flow the adorne. The sada miter the jobie. If something is blotched then it miter the adorne. If something is lithuanian and crisscross then it loiter the leroy. If something is blotched and it miter the adorne then it loiter the sada. If the sada loiter the leroy and the sada loiter the adorne then the adorne flow the leroy. If something flow the jobie then it flow the leroy. If something miter the adorne and it loiter the sada then it is hardback. The jobie miter the jobie.", "logic": "\nLoiter(leroy, jobie)\nMiter(jobie, sada)\nLoiter(adorne, jobie)\nMiter(adorne, jobie)\nBlotched(sada)\nFlow(sada, adorne)\nMiter(sada, jobie)\nforall x (Blotched(x) -> Miter(x, adorne))\nforall x (Lithuanian(x) and Crisscross(x) -> Loiter(x, leroy))\nforall x (Blotched(x) and Miter(x, adorne) -> Loiter(x, sada))\nLoiter(sada, leroy) and Loiter(sada, adorne) -> Flow(adorne, leroy)\nforall x (Flow(x, jobie) -> Flow(x, leroy))\nforall x (Miter(x, adorne) and Loiter(x, sada) -> Hardback(x))\n\nMiter(jobie, jobie)\n\nMiter(jobie, jobie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The wilmette ring the alexi. The alexi retrospect the clare. The gilberte ring the alexi. The gilberte retrospect the alexi. The clare is whiney. The clare broker the gilberte. The clare retrospect the alexi. If something is whiney then it retrospect the gilberte. If something is volar and undesiring then it ring the wilmette. If something is whiney and it retrospect the gilberte then it ring the clare. If the clare ring the wilmette and the clare ring the gilberte then the gilberte broker the wilmette. If something broker the alexi then it broker the wilmette. If something retrospect the gilberte and it ring the clare then it is moneyless. The alexi is not kind.", "logic": "\nRing(wilmette, alexi)\nRetrospect(alexi, clare)\nRing(gilberte, alexi)\nRetrospect(gilberte, alexi)\nWhiney(clare)\nBroker(clare, gilberte)\nRetrospect(clare, alexi)\nforall x (Whiney(x) -> Retrospect(x, gilberte))\nforall x (Volar(x) and Undesiring(x) -> Ring(x, wilmette))\nforall x (Whiney(x) and Retrospect(x, gilberte) -> Ring(x, clare))\nRing(clare, wilmette) and Ring(clare, gilberte) -> Broker(gilberte, wilmette)\nforall x (Broker(x, alexi) -> Broker(x, wilmette))\nforall x (Retrospect(x, gilberte) and Ring(x, clare) -> Moneyless(x))\n\nnot Kind(alexi)\n\nnot Kind(alexi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The walt spat the dorolisa. The dorolisa trifurcate the emiline. The kacy spat the dorolisa. The kacy trifurcate the dorolisa. The emiline is venereal. The emiline burn the kacy. The emiline trifurcate the dorolisa. If something is venereal then it trifurcate the kacy. If something is changeful and torulose then it spat the walt. If something is venereal and it trifurcate the kacy then it spat the emiline. If the emiline spat the walt and the emiline spat the kacy then the kacy burn the walt. If something burn the dorolisa then it burn the walt. If something trifurcate the kacy and it spat the emiline then it is patched. The walt trifurcate the walt.", "logic": "\nSpat(walt, dorolisa)\nTrifurcate(dorolisa, emiline)\nSpat(kacy, dorolisa)\nTrifurcate(kacy, dorolisa)\nVenereal(emiline)\nBurn(emiline, kacy)\nTrifurcate(emiline, dorolisa)\nforall x (Venereal(x) -> Trifurcate(x, kacy))\nforall x (Changeful(x) and Torulose(x) -> Spat(x, walt))\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Trifurcate(x, kacy) -> Spat(x, emiline))\nSpat(emiline, walt) and Spat(emiline, kacy) -> Burn(kacy, walt)\nforall x (Burn(x, dorolisa) -> Burn(x, walt))\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, kacy) and Spat(x, emiline) -> Patched(x))\n\nTrifurcate(walt, walt)\n\nTrifurcate(walt, walt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "Matthieu is ladylike. Uriah is xlviii. Nanon is imitation. Yank is friendless. Smart things are shaped. All xlviii things are not imitation. If something is shaped and not imitation then it is friendless. Big things are altered. All imitation things are not altered. Rough, xlviii things are proustian. If something is xlviii and proustian then it is ladylike. All xlviii, shaped things are ladylike. Matthieu is ladylike.", "logic": "\nLadylike(matthieu)\nXlviii(uriah)\nImitation(nanon)\nFriendless(yank)\nforall x (Xlviii(x) -> Shaped(x))\nforall x (Xlviii(x) -> not Imitation(x))\nforall x (Shaped(x) and not Imitation(x) -> Friendless(x))\nforall x (Ladylike(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Imitation(x) -> not Altered(x))\nforall x (Friendless(x) and Xlviii(x) -> Proustian(x))\nforall x (Xlviii(x) and Proustian(x) -> Ladylike(x))\nforall x (Xlviii(x) and Shaped(x) -> Ladylike(x))\n\nLadylike(matthieu)\n\ntherefore Ladylike(matthieu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Larina is cherished. Thedric is emotive. Jamie is risible. Rosalind is handed. Smart things are lysogenic. All emotive things are not risible. If something is lysogenic and not risible then it is handed. Big things are antigenic. All risible things are not antigenic. Rough, emotive things are amoeboid. If something is emotive and amoeboid then it is cherished. All emotive, lysogenic things are cherished. Rosalind is not handed.", "logic": "\nCherished(larina)\nEmotive(thedric)\nRisible(jamie)\nHanded(rosalind)\nforall x (Emotive(x) -> Lysogenic(x))\nforall x (Emotive(x) -> not Risible(x))\nforall x (Lysogenic(x) and not Risible(x) -> Handed(x))\nforall x (Cherished(x) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Risible(x) -> not Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Handed(x) and Emotive(x) -> Amoeboid(x))\nforall x (Emotive(x) and Amoeboid(x) -> Cherished(x))\nforall x (Emotive(x) and Lysogenic(x) -> Cherished(x))\n\nnot Handed(rosalind)\n\ntherefore Handed(rosalind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Ramon is semilunar. Alena is giving. Marius is million. Euphemia is trapped. Smart things are roughish. All giving things are not million. If something is roughish and not million then it is trapped. Big things are composite. All million things are not composite. Rough, giving things are masterful. If something is giving and masterful then it is semilunar. All giving, roughish things are semilunar. Alena is roughish.", "logic": "\nSemilunar(ramon)\nGiving(alena)\nMillion(marius)\nTrapped(euphemia)\nforall x (Giving(x) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) -> not Million(x))\nforall x (Roughish(x) and not Million(x) -> Trapped(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Million(x) -> not Composite(x))\nforall x (Trapped(x) and Giving(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and Masterful(x) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and Roughish(x) -> Semilunar(x))\n\nRoughish(alena)\n\nGiving(alena) and forall x (Giving(x) -> Roughish(x)) -> therefore Roughish(alena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Fonz is dead. Samuella is stirred. Hallam is aramean. Engelbert is mucose. Smart things are spirituous. All stirred things are not aramean. If something is spirituous and not aramean then it is mucose. Big things are tasselled. All aramean things are not tasselled. Rough, stirred things are mincing. If something is stirred and mincing then it is dead. All stirred, spirituous things are dead. Hallam is tasselled.", "logic": "\nDead(fonz)\nStirred(samuella)\nAramean(hallam)\nMucose(engelbert)\nforall x (Stirred(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Stirred(x) -> not Aramean(x))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) and not Aramean(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) -> Tasselled(x))\nforall x (Aramean(x) -> not Tasselled(x))\nforall x (Mucose(x) and Stirred(x) -> Mincing(x))\nforall x (Stirred(x) and Mincing(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Stirred(x) and Spirituous(x) -> Dead(x))\n\nTasselled(hallam)\n\nAramean(hallam) and forall x (Aramean(x) -> not Tasselled(x)) -> therefore not Tasselled(hallam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Hedvig is bacillary. Annmarie is unhoped. April is restive. Rodney is jolting. Smart things are killing. All unhoped things are not restive. If something is killing and not restive then it is jolting. Big things are slanting. All restive things are not slanting. Rough, unhoped things are fastidious. If something is unhoped and fastidious then it is bacillary. All unhoped, killing things are bacillary. Annmarie is bacillary.", "logic": "\nBacillary(hedvig)\nUnhoped(annmarie)\nRestive(april)\nJolting(rodney)\nforall x (Unhoped(x) -> Killing(x))\nforall x (Unhoped(x) -> not Restive(x))\nforall x (Killing(x) and not Restive(x) -> Jolting(x))\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Slanting(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) -> not Slanting(x))\nforall x (Jolting(x) and Unhoped(x) -> Fastidious(x))\nforall x (Unhoped(x) and Fastidious(x) -> Bacillary(x))\nforall x (Unhoped(x) and Killing(x) -> Bacillary(x))\n\nBacillary(annmarie)\n\nUnhoped(annmarie) and forall x (Unhoped(x) -> Killing(x)) -> therefore Killing(annmarie) Unhoped(annmarie) and Killing(annmarie) and forall x (Unhoped(x) and Killing(x) -> Bacillary(x)) -> therefore Bacillary(annmarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Lynne is affirmable. Jehu is caroline. Stanwood is tacky. Neddie is tenth. Smart things are alive. All caroline things are not tacky. If something is alive and not tacky then it is tenth. Big things are corned. All tacky things are not corned. Rough, caroline things are utter. If something is caroline and utter then it is affirmable. All caroline, alive things are affirmable. Jehu is not affirmable.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(lynne)\nCaroline(jehu)\nTacky(stanwood)\nTenth(neddie)\nforall x (Caroline(x) -> Alive(x))\nforall x (Caroline(x) -> not Tacky(x))\nforall x (Alive(x) and not Tacky(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Corned(x))\nforall x (Tacky(x) -> not Corned(x))\nforall x (Tenth(x) and Caroline(x) -> Utter(x))\nforall x (Caroline(x) and Utter(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nforall x (Caroline(x) and Alive(x) -> Affirmable(x))\n\nnot Affirmable(jehu)\n\nCaroline(jehu) and forall x (Caroline(x) -> Alive(x)) -> therefore Alive(jehu) Caroline(jehu) and Alive(jehu) and forall x (Caroline(x) and Alive(x) -> Affirmable(x)) -> therefore Affirmable(jehu)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Garfield is epicarpal. Theodosia is mass. Dalia is prodromal. Timi is bicolour. Smart things are braky. All mass things are not prodromal. If something is braky and not prodromal then it is bicolour. Big things are unenrgetic. All prodromal things are not unenrgetic. Rough, mass things are suspensive. If something is mass and suspensive then it is epicarpal. All mass, braky things are epicarpal. Theodosia is suspensive.", "logic": "\nEpicarpal(garfield)\nMass(theodosia)\nProdromal(dalia)\nBicolour(timi)\nforall x (Mass(x) -> Braky(x))\nforall x (Mass(x) -> not Prodromal(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and not Prodromal(x) -> Bicolour(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) -> Unenrgetic(x))\nforall x (Prodromal(x) -> not Unenrgetic(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and Mass(x) -> Suspensive(x))\nforall x (Mass(x) and Suspensive(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\nforall x (Mass(x) and Braky(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\n\nSuspensive(theodosia)\n\nMass(theodosia) and forall x (Mass(x) -> Braky(x)) -> therefore Braky(theodosia) Mass(theodosia) and forall x (Mass(x) -> not Prodromal(x)) -> therefore not Prodromal(theodosia) Braky(theodosia) and not Prodromal(theodosia) and forall x (Braky(x) and not Prodromal(x) -> Bicolour(x)) -> therefore Bicolour(theodosia) Bicolour(theodosia) and Mass(theodosia) and forall x (Bicolour(x) and Mass(x) -> Suspensive(x)) -> therefore Suspensive(theodosia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Rycca is aecial. Suzan is unhygienic. Sharon is haematic. Hermina is headlong. Smart things are tenfold. All unhygienic things are not haematic. If something is tenfold and not haematic then it is headlong. Big things are activating. All haematic things are not activating. Rough, unhygienic things are baculiform. If something is unhygienic and baculiform then it is aecial. All unhygienic, tenfold things are aecial. Suzan is not activating.", "logic": "\nAecial(rycca)\nUnhygienic(suzan)\nHaematic(sharon)\nHeadlong(hermina)\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) -> Tenfold(x))\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) -> not Haematic(x))\nforall x (Tenfold(x) and not Haematic(x) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Activating(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) -> not Activating(x))\nforall x (Headlong(x) and Unhygienic(x) -> Baculiform(x))\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) and Baculiform(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) and Tenfold(x) -> Aecial(x))\n\nnot Activating(suzan)\n\nUnhygienic(suzan) and forall x (Unhygienic(x) -> Tenfold(x)) -> therefore Tenfold(suzan) Unhygienic(suzan) and Tenfold(suzan) and forall x (Unhygienic(x) and Tenfold(x) -> Aecial(x)) -> therefore Aecial(suzan) Aecial(suzan) and forall x (Aecial(x) -> Activating(x)) -> therefore Activating(suzan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Kacie is available. Lynnelle is conjugated. Janette is cataclinal. Thomasa is tasteful. Smart things are fictitious. All conjugated things are not cataclinal. If something is fictitious and not cataclinal then it is tasteful. Big things are lenten. All cataclinal things are not lenten. Rough, conjugated things are muscovite. If something is conjugated and muscovite then it is available. All conjugated, fictitious things are available. Thomasa is not available.", "logic": "\nAvailable(kacie)\nConjugated(lynnelle)\nCataclinal(janette)\nTasteful(thomasa)\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> not Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Fictitious(x) and not Cataclinal(x) -> Tasteful(x))\nforall x (Available(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) -> not Lenten(x))\nforall x (Tasteful(x) and Conjugated(x) -> Muscovite(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Muscovite(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Fictitious(x) -> Available(x))\n\nnot Available(thomasa)\n\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Muscovite(x) -> Available(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Eliott is menacing. Alyssa is rumansh. Sheffield is dashing. Suellen is antithetic. Smart things are unenrgetic. All rumansh things are not dashing. If something is unenrgetic and not dashing then it is antithetic. Big things are cadaverous. All dashing things are not cadaverous. Rough, rumansh things are motherly. If something is rumansh and motherly then it is menacing. All rumansh, unenrgetic things are menacing. Sheffield is antithetic.", "logic": "\nMenacing(eliott)\nRumansh(alyssa)\nDashing(sheffield)\nAntithetic(suellen)\nforall x (Rumansh(x) -> Unenrgetic(x))\nforall x (Rumansh(x) -> not Dashing(x))\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) and not Dashing(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Menacing(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> not Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Antithetic(x) and Rumansh(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Rumansh(x) and Motherly(x) -> Menacing(x))\nforall x (Rumansh(x) and Unenrgetic(x) -> Menacing(x))\n\nAntithetic(sheffield)\n\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) and not Dashing(x) -> Antithetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Lucilia is truncate. Willmott is elaborated. Miranda is thai. Zilvia is ahead. Smart things are maximizing. All elaborated things are not thai. If something is maximizing and not thai then it is ahead. Big things are partial. All thai things are not partial. Rough, elaborated things are biting. If something is elaborated and biting then it is truncate. All elaborated, maximizing things are truncate. Miranda is not maximizing.", "logic": "\nTruncate(lucilia)\nElaborated(willmott)\nThai(miranda)\nAhead(zilvia)\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Maximizing(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> not Thai(x))\nforall x (Maximizing(x) and not Thai(x) -> Ahead(x))\nforall x (Truncate(x) -> Partial(x))\nforall x (Thai(x) -> not Partial(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) and Elaborated(x) -> Biting(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and Biting(x) -> Truncate(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and Maximizing(x) -> Truncate(x))\n\nnot Maximizing(miranda)\n\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Maximizing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Pandora is fussy. Cloris is attenuated. Demetri is pilary. Whitaker is dentate. Smart things are agnostic. All attenuated things are not pilary. If something is agnostic and not pilary then it is dentate. Big things are rupestral. All pilary things are not rupestral. Rough, attenuated things are nimble. If something is attenuated and nimble then it is fussy. All attenuated, agnostic things are fussy. Demetri is fussy.", "logic": "\nFussy(pandora)\nAttenuated(cloris)\nPilary(demetri)\nDentate(whitaker)\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> Agnostic(x))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> not Pilary(x))\nforall x (Agnostic(x) and not Pilary(x) -> Dentate(x))\nforall x (Fussy(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> not Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Dentate(x) and Attenuated(x) -> Nimble(x))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) and Nimble(x) -> Fussy(x))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) and Agnostic(x) -> Fussy(x))\n\nFussy(demetri)\n\nforall x (Attenuated(x) and Nimble(x) -> Fussy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Andy is stoned. Linnea is toughened. Lethia is lossy. Petey is nomadic. Smart things are bone. All toughened things are not lossy. If something is bone and not lossy then it is nomadic. Big things are spiderlike. All lossy things are not spiderlike. Rough, toughened things are digitate. If something is toughened and digitate then it is stoned. All toughened, bone things are stoned. Petey is not toughened.", "logic": "\nStoned(andy)\nToughened(linnea)\nLossy(lethia)\nNomadic(petey)\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Bone(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> not Lossy(x))\nforall x (Bone(x) and not Lossy(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nforall x (Stoned(x) -> Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Lossy(x) -> not Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) and Toughened(x) -> Digitate(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and Digitate(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and Bone(x) -> Stoned(x))\n\nnot Toughened(petey)\n\nnot Toughened(petey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Tadeas is xxxv. Annalisa is aphonic. Colette is damned. Vinita is afflictive. Smart things are throbbing. All aphonic things are not damned. If something is throbbing and not damned then it is afflictive. Big things are omnivorous. All damned things are not omnivorous. Rough, aphonic things are barometric. If something is aphonic and barometric then it is xxxv. All aphonic, throbbing things are xxxv. Tadeas is damned.", "logic": "\nXxxv(tadeas)\nAphonic(annalisa)\nDamned(colette)\nAfflictive(vinita)\nforall x (Aphonic(x) -> Throbbing(x))\nforall x (Aphonic(x) -> not Damned(x))\nforall x (Throbbing(x) and not Damned(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) -> Omnivorous(x))\nforall x (Damned(x) -> not Omnivorous(x))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) and Aphonic(x) -> Barometric(x))\nforall x (Aphonic(x) and Barometric(x) -> Xxxv(x))\nforall x (Aphonic(x) and Throbbing(x) -> Xxxv(x))\n\nDamned(tadeas)\n\nDamned(tadeas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Hill is blunted. Blinnie is blate. Burgess is comal. Laurena is proficient. Smart things are antheral. All blate things are not comal. If something is antheral and not comal then it is proficient. Big things are erroneous. All comal things are not erroneous. Rough, blate things are vagabond. If something is blate and vagabond then it is blunted. All blate, antheral things are blunted. Hill is not blate.", "logic": "\nBlunted(hill)\nBlate(blinnie)\nComal(burgess)\nProficient(laurena)\nforall x (Blate(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Blate(x) -> not Comal(x))\nforall x (Antheral(x) and not Comal(x) -> Proficient(x))\nforall x (Blunted(x) -> Erroneous(x))\nforall x (Comal(x) -> not Erroneous(x))\nforall x (Proficient(x) and Blate(x) -> Vagabond(x))\nforall x (Blate(x) and Vagabond(x) -> Blunted(x))\nforall x (Blate(x) and Antheral(x) -> Blunted(x))\n\nnot Blate(hill)\n\nnot Blate(hill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Sylvester is astonied. Genevra is uncreased. Ola is formalized. Blakeley is alabaster. Smart things are canty. All uncreased things are not formalized. If something is canty and not formalized then it is alabaster. Big things are chuffed. All formalized things are not chuffed. Rough, uncreased things are trilled. If something is uncreased and trilled then it is astonied. All uncreased, canty things are astonied. Ola is uncreased.", "logic": "\nAstonied(sylvester)\nUncreased(genevra)\nFormalized(ola)\nAlabaster(blakeley)\nforall x (Uncreased(x) -> Canty(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) -> not Formalized(x))\nforall x (Canty(x) and not Formalized(x) -> Alabaster(x))\nforall x (Astonied(x) -> Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> not Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Alabaster(x) and Uncreased(x) -> Trilled(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Trilled(x) -> Astonied(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Canty(x) -> Astonied(x))\n\nUncreased(ola)\n\nUncreased(ola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "The kassie dance the theodor. The kassie dance the dickey. The theodor is horrified. The theodor auscultate the kassie. The theodor auscultate the dickey. The theodor dance the dickey. The theodor gratify the dickey. The dickey is outside. The dickey auscultate the kassie. The dickey dance the kassie. If someone auscultate the dickey then they like the theodor. If someone dance the theodor and the theodor auscultate the dickey then they visit the theodor. If someone dance the theodor then the theodor is horrified. If someone gratify the theodor and the theodor auscultate the dickey then they need the kassie. If someone auscultate the kassie then the kassie is horrified. If someone auscultate the kassie then they need the theodor. The theodor auscultate the kassie.", "logic": "\nDance(kassie, theodor)\nDance(kassie, dickey)\nHorrified(theodor)\nAuscultate(theodor, kassie)\nAuscultate(theodor, dickey)\nDance(theodor, dickey)\nGratify(theodor, dickey)\nOutside(dickey)\nAuscultate(dickey, kassie)\nDance(dickey, kassie)\nforall x (Auscultate(x, dickey) -> Auscultate(x, theodor))\nforall x (Dance(x, theodor) and Auscultate(theodor, dickey) -> Gratify(x, theodor))\nforall x (Dance(x, theodor) -> Horrified(theodor))\nforall x (Gratify(x, theodor) and Auscultate(theodor, dickey) -> Dance(x, kassie))\nforall x (Auscultate(x, kassie) -> Horrified(kassie))\nforall x (Auscultate(x, kassie) -> Dance(x, theodor))\n\nAuscultate(theodor, kassie)\n\ntherefore Auscultate(theodor, kassie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The paco loose the trix. The paco loose the merrielle. The trix is rumpled. The trix lipstick the paco. The trix lipstick the merrielle. The trix loose the merrielle. The trix disgust the merrielle. The merrielle is norwegian. The merrielle lipstick the paco. The merrielle loose the paco. If someone lipstick the merrielle then they like the trix. If someone loose the trix and the trix lipstick the merrielle then they visit the trix. If someone loose the trix then the trix is rumpled. If someone disgust the trix and the trix lipstick the merrielle then they need the paco. If someone lipstick the paco then the paco is rumpled. If someone lipstick the paco then they need the trix. The merrielle is not norwegian.", "logic": "\nLoose(paco, trix)\nLoose(paco, merrielle)\nRumpled(trix)\nLipstick(trix, paco)\nLipstick(trix, merrielle)\nLoose(trix, merrielle)\nDisgust(trix, merrielle)\nNorwegian(merrielle)\nLipstick(merrielle, paco)\nLoose(merrielle, paco)\nforall x (Lipstick(x, merrielle) -> Lipstick(x, trix))\nforall x (Loose(x, trix) and Lipstick(trix, merrielle) -> Disgust(x, trix))\nforall x (Loose(x, trix) -> Rumpled(trix))\nforall x (Disgust(x, trix) and Lipstick(trix, merrielle) -> Loose(x, paco))\nforall x (Lipstick(x, paco) -> Rumpled(paco))\nforall x (Lipstick(x, paco) -> Loose(x, trix))\n\nnot Norwegian(merrielle)\n\ntherefore Norwegian(merrielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The malia bootstrap the brock. The malia bootstrap the raphaela. The brock is wheelless. The brock overtake the malia. The brock overtake the raphaela. The brock bootstrap the raphaela. The brock quarry the raphaela. The raphaela is plane. The raphaela overtake the malia. The raphaela bootstrap the malia. If someone overtake the raphaela then they like the brock. If someone bootstrap the brock and the brock overtake the raphaela then they visit the brock. If someone bootstrap the brock then the brock is wheelless. If someone quarry the brock and the brock overtake the raphaela then they need the malia. If someone overtake the malia then the malia is wheelless. If someone overtake the malia then they need the brock. The raphaela bootstrap the brock.", "logic": "\nBootstrap(malia, brock)\nBootstrap(malia, raphaela)\nWheelless(brock)\nOvertake(brock, malia)\nOvertake(brock, raphaela)\nBootstrap(brock, raphaela)\nQuarry(brock, raphaela)\nPlane(raphaela)\nOvertake(raphaela, malia)\nBootstrap(raphaela, malia)\nforall x (Overtake(x, raphaela) -> Overtake(x, brock))\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, brock) and Overtake(brock, raphaela) -> Quarry(x, brock))\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, brock) -> Wheelless(brock))\nforall x (Quarry(x, brock) and Overtake(brock, raphaela) -> Bootstrap(x, malia))\nforall x (Overtake(x, malia) -> Wheelless(malia))\nforall x (Overtake(x, malia) -> Bootstrap(x, brock))\n\nBootstrap(raphaela, brock)\n\nOvertake(raphaela, malia) and forall x (Overtake(x, malia) -> Bootstrap(x, brock)) -> therefore Bootstrap(raphaela, brock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The cindi pluck the cybill. The cindi pluck the penny. The cybill is prostatic. The cybill claret the cindi. The cybill claret the penny. The cybill pluck the penny. The cybill flocculate the penny. The penny is absorbed. The penny claret the cindi. The penny pluck the cindi. If someone claret the penny then they like the cybill. If someone pluck the cybill and the cybill claret the penny then they visit the cybill. If someone pluck the cybill then the cybill is prostatic. If someone flocculate the cybill and the cybill claret the penny then they need the cindi. If someone claret the cindi then the cindi is prostatic. If someone claret the cindi then they need the cybill. The cindi does not visit the cybill.", "logic": "\nPluck(cindi, cybill)\nPluck(cindi, penny)\nProstatic(cybill)\nClaret(cybill, cindi)\nClaret(cybill, penny)\nPluck(cybill, penny)\nFlocculate(cybill, penny)\nAbsorbed(penny)\nClaret(penny, cindi)\nPluck(penny, cindi)\nforall x (Claret(x, penny) -> Claret(x, cybill))\nforall x (Pluck(x, cybill) and Claret(cybill, penny) -> Flocculate(x, cybill))\nforall x (Pluck(x, cybill) -> Prostatic(cybill))\nforall x (Flocculate(x, cybill) and Claret(cybill, penny) -> Pluck(x, cindi))\nforall x (Claret(x, cindi) -> Prostatic(cindi))\nforall x (Claret(x, cindi) -> Pluck(x, cybill))\n\nnot Flocculate(cindi, cybill)\n\nPluck(cindi, cybill) and Claret(cybill, penny) and forall x (Pluck(x, cybill) and Claret(cybill, penny) -> Flocculate(x, cybill)) -> therefore Flocculate(cindi, cybill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The morse tether the judy. The morse tether the simonette. The judy is botanic. The judy intercept the morse. The judy intercept the simonette. The judy tether the simonette. The judy perennate the simonette. The simonette is alpine. The simonette intercept the morse. The simonette tether the morse. If someone intercept the simonette then they like the judy. If someone tether the judy and the judy intercept the simonette then they visit the judy. If someone tether the judy then the judy is botanic. If someone perennate the judy and the judy intercept the simonette then they need the morse. If someone intercept the morse then the morse is botanic. If someone intercept the morse then they need the judy. The simonette perennate the judy.", "logic": "\nTether(morse, judy)\nTether(morse, simonette)\nBotanic(judy)\nIntercept(judy, morse)\nIntercept(judy, simonette)\nTether(judy, simonette)\nPerennate(judy, simonette)\nAlpine(simonette)\nIntercept(simonette, morse)\nTether(simonette, morse)\nforall x (Intercept(x, simonette) -> Intercept(x, judy))\nforall x (Tether(x, judy) and Intercept(judy, simonette) -> Perennate(x, judy))\nforall x (Tether(x, judy) -> Botanic(judy))\nforall x (Perennate(x, judy) and Intercept(judy, simonette) -> Tether(x, morse))\nforall x (Intercept(x, morse) -> Botanic(morse))\nforall x (Intercept(x, morse) -> Tether(x, judy))\n\nPerennate(simonette, judy)\n\nIntercept(simonette, morse) and forall x (Intercept(x, morse) -> Tether(x, judy)) -> therefore Tether(simonette, judy) Tether(simonette, judy) and Intercept(judy, simonette) and forall x (Tether(x, judy) and Intercept(judy, simonette) -> Perennate(x, judy)) -> therefore Perennate(simonette, judy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The cristal queer the wat. The cristal queer the fergus. The wat is haggard. The wat grandstand the cristal. The wat grandstand the fergus. The wat queer the fergus. The wat misapply the fergus. The fergus is dyspneal. The fergus grandstand the cristal. The fergus queer the cristal. If someone grandstand the fergus then they like the wat. If someone queer the wat and the wat grandstand the fergus then they visit the wat. If someone queer the wat then the wat is haggard. If someone misapply the wat and the wat grandstand the fergus then they need the cristal. If someone grandstand the cristal then the cristal is haggard. If someone grandstand the cristal then they need the wat. The fergus does not visit the wat.", "logic": "\nQueer(cristal, wat)\nQueer(cristal, fergus)\nHaggard(wat)\nGrandstand(wat, cristal)\nGrandstand(wat, fergus)\nQueer(wat, fergus)\nMisapply(wat, fergus)\nDyspneal(fergus)\nGrandstand(fergus, cristal)\nQueer(fergus, cristal)\nforall x (Grandstand(x, fergus) -> Grandstand(x, wat))\nforall x (Queer(x, wat) and Grandstand(wat, fergus) -> Misapply(x, wat))\nforall x (Queer(x, wat) -> Haggard(wat))\nforall x (Misapply(x, wat) and Grandstand(wat, fergus) -> Queer(x, cristal))\nforall x (Grandstand(x, cristal) -> Haggard(cristal))\nforall x (Grandstand(x, cristal) -> Queer(x, wat))\n\nnot Misapply(fergus, wat)\n\nGrandstand(fergus, cristal) and forall x (Grandstand(x, cristal) -> Queer(x, wat)) -> therefore Queer(fergus, wat) Queer(fergus, wat) and Grandstand(wat, fergus) and forall x (Queer(x, wat) and Grandstand(wat, fergus) -> Misapply(x, wat)) -> therefore Misapply(fergus, wat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The danyette hollo the miquela. The danyette hollo the vikky. The miquela is flossy. The miquela brief the danyette. The miquela brief the vikky. The miquela hollo the vikky. The miquela gouge the vikky. The vikky is apish. The vikky brief the danyette. The vikky hollo the danyette. If someone brief the vikky then they like the miquela. If someone hollo the miquela and the miquela brief the vikky then they visit the miquela. If someone hollo the miquela then the miquela is flossy. If someone gouge the miquela and the miquela brief the vikky then they need the danyette. If someone brief the danyette then the danyette is flossy. If someone brief the danyette then they need the miquela. The miquela hollo the danyette.", "logic": "\nHollo(danyette, miquela)\nHollo(danyette, vikky)\nFlossy(miquela)\nBrief(miquela, danyette)\nBrief(miquela, vikky)\nHollo(miquela, vikky)\nGouge(miquela, vikky)\nApish(vikky)\nBrief(vikky, danyette)\nHollo(vikky, danyette)\nforall x (Brief(x, vikky) -> Brief(x, miquela))\nforall x (Hollo(x, miquela) and Brief(miquela, vikky) -> Gouge(x, miquela))\nforall x (Hollo(x, miquela) -> Flossy(miquela))\nforall x (Gouge(x, miquela) and Brief(miquela, vikky) -> Hollo(x, danyette))\nforall x (Brief(x, danyette) -> Flossy(danyette))\nforall x (Brief(x, danyette) -> Hollo(x, miquela))\n\nHollo(miquela, danyette)\n\nBrief(miquela, danyette) and forall x (Brief(x, danyette) -> Hollo(x, miquela)) -> therefore Hollo(miquela, miquela) Hollo(miquela, miquela) and Brief(miquela, vikky) and forall x (Hollo(x, miquela) and Brief(miquela, vikky) -> Gouge(x, miquela)) -> therefore Gouge(miquela, miquela) Gouge(miquela, miquela) and Brief(miquela, vikky) and forall x (Gouge(x, miquela) and Brief(miquela, vikky) -> Hollo(x, danyette)) -> therefore Hollo(miquela, danyette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The clementia ostracize the rodolfo. The clementia ostracize the rina. The rodolfo is socialised. The rodolfo yacht the clementia. The rodolfo yacht the rina. The rodolfo ostracize the rina. The rodolfo stoke the rina. The rina is twisty. The rina yacht the clementia. The rina ostracize the clementia. If someone yacht the rina then they like the rodolfo. If someone ostracize the rodolfo and the rodolfo yacht the rina then they visit the rodolfo. If someone ostracize the rodolfo then the rodolfo is socialised. If someone stoke the rodolfo and the rodolfo yacht the rina then they need the clementia. If someone yacht the clementia then the clementia is socialised. If someone yacht the clementia then they need the rodolfo. The rodolfo does not need the clementia.", "logic": "\nOstracize(clementia, rodolfo)\nOstracize(clementia, rina)\nSocialised(rodolfo)\nYacht(rodolfo, clementia)\nYacht(rodolfo, rina)\nOstracize(rodolfo, rina)\nStoke(rodolfo, rina)\nTwisty(rina)\nYacht(rina, clementia)\nOstracize(rina, clementia)\nforall x (Yacht(x, rina) -> Yacht(x, rodolfo))\nforall x (Ostracize(x, rodolfo) and Yacht(rodolfo, rina) -> Stoke(x, rodolfo))\nforall x (Ostracize(x, rodolfo) -> Socialised(rodolfo))\nforall x (Stoke(x, rodolfo) and Yacht(rodolfo, rina) -> Ostracize(x, clementia))\nforall x (Yacht(x, clementia) -> Socialised(clementia))\nforall x (Yacht(x, clementia) -> Ostracize(x, rodolfo))\n\nnot Ostracize(rodolfo, clementia)\n\nYacht(rodolfo, clementia) and forall x (Yacht(x, clementia) -> Ostracize(x, rodolfo)) -> therefore Ostracize(rodolfo, rodolfo) Ostracize(rodolfo, rodolfo) and Yacht(rodolfo, rina) and forall x (Ostracize(x, rodolfo) and Yacht(rodolfo, rina) -> Stoke(x, rodolfo)) -> therefore Stoke(rodolfo, rodolfo) Stoke(rodolfo, rodolfo) and Yacht(rodolfo, rina) and forall x (Stoke(x, rodolfo) and Yacht(rodolfo, rina) -> Ostracize(x, clementia)) -> therefore Ostracize(rodolfo, clementia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The marabel compere the ealasaid. The marabel compere the tasha. The ealasaid is bereft. The ealasaid pule the marabel. The ealasaid pule the tasha. The ealasaid compere the tasha. The ealasaid bolster the tasha. The tasha is neutral. The tasha pule the marabel. The tasha compere the marabel. If someone pule the tasha then they like the ealasaid. If someone compere the ealasaid and the ealasaid pule the tasha then they visit the ealasaid. If someone compere the ealasaid then the ealasaid is bereft. If someone bolster the ealasaid and the ealasaid pule the tasha then they need the marabel. If someone pule the marabel then the marabel is bereft. If someone pule the marabel then they need the ealasaid. The tasha does not like the ealasaid.", "logic": "\nCompere(marabel, ealasaid)\nCompere(marabel, tasha)\nBereft(ealasaid)\nPule(ealasaid, marabel)\nPule(ealasaid, tasha)\nCompere(ealasaid, tasha)\nBolster(ealasaid, tasha)\nNeutral(tasha)\nPule(tasha, marabel)\nCompere(tasha, marabel)\nforall x (Pule(x, tasha) -> Pule(x, ealasaid))\nforall x (Compere(x, ealasaid) and Pule(ealasaid, tasha) -> Bolster(x, ealasaid))\nforall x (Compere(x, ealasaid) -> Bereft(ealasaid))\nforall x (Bolster(x, ealasaid) and Pule(ealasaid, tasha) -> Compere(x, marabel))\nforall x (Pule(x, marabel) -> Bereft(marabel))\nforall x (Pule(x, marabel) -> Compere(x, ealasaid))\n\nnot Pule(tasha, ealasaid)\n\nforall x (Pule(x, tasha) -> Pule(x, ealasaid)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The noble scorch the orren. The noble scorch the robinett. The orren is overweight. The orren enshroud the noble. The orren enshroud the robinett. The orren scorch the robinett. The orren subtilize the robinett. The robinett is stunning. The robinett enshroud the noble. The robinett scorch the noble. If someone enshroud the robinett then they like the orren. If someone scorch the orren and the orren enshroud the robinett then they visit the orren. If someone scorch the orren then the orren is overweight. If someone subtilize the orren and the orren enshroud the robinett then they need the noble. If someone enshroud the noble then the noble is overweight. If someone enshroud the noble then they need the orren. The noble enshroud the orren.", "logic": "\nScorch(noble, orren)\nScorch(noble, robinett)\nOverweight(orren)\nEnshroud(orren, noble)\nEnshroud(orren, robinett)\nScorch(orren, robinett)\nSubtilize(orren, robinett)\nStunning(robinett)\nEnshroud(robinett, noble)\nScorch(robinett, noble)\nforall x (Enshroud(x, robinett) -> Enshroud(x, orren))\nforall x (Scorch(x, orren) and Enshroud(orren, robinett) -> Subtilize(x, orren))\nforall x (Scorch(x, orren) -> Overweight(orren))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, orren) and Enshroud(orren, robinett) -> Scorch(x, noble))\nforall x (Enshroud(x, noble) -> Overweight(noble))\nforall x (Enshroud(x, noble) -> Scorch(x, orren))\n\nEnshroud(noble, orren)\n\nforall x (Enshroud(x, robinett) -> Enshroud(x, orren)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The gregor illuminate the britte. The gregor illuminate the geo. The britte is burned. The britte clapboard the gregor. The britte clapboard the geo. The britte illuminate the geo. The britte port the geo. The geo is percipient. The geo clapboard the gregor. The geo illuminate the gregor. If someone clapboard the geo then they like the britte. If someone illuminate the britte and the britte clapboard the geo then they visit the britte. If someone illuminate the britte then the britte is burned. If someone port the britte and the britte clapboard the geo then they need the gregor. If someone clapboard the gregor then the gregor is burned. If someone clapboard the gregor then they need the britte. The geo is not big.", "logic": "\nIlluminate(gregor, britte)\nIlluminate(gregor, geo)\nBurned(britte)\nClapboard(britte, gregor)\nClapboard(britte, geo)\nIlluminate(britte, geo)\nPort(britte, geo)\nPercipient(geo)\nClapboard(geo, gregor)\nIlluminate(geo, gregor)\nforall x (Clapboard(x, geo) -> Clapboard(x, britte))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, britte) and Clapboard(britte, geo) -> Port(x, britte))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, britte) -> Burned(britte))\nforall x (Port(x, britte) and Clapboard(britte, geo) -> Illuminate(x, gregor))\nforall x (Clapboard(x, gregor) -> Burned(gregor))\nforall x (Clapboard(x, gregor) -> Illuminate(x, britte))\n\nnot Big(geo)\n\nnot Big(geo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The jenica foal the arliene. The jenica foal the golda. The arliene is negro. The arliene roll the jenica. The arliene roll the golda. The arliene foal the golda. The arliene mistrust the golda. The golda is canonical. The golda roll the jenica. The golda foal the jenica. If someone roll the golda then they like the arliene. If someone foal the arliene and the arliene roll the golda then they visit the arliene. If someone foal the arliene then the arliene is negro. If someone mistrust the arliene and the arliene roll the golda then they need the jenica. If someone roll the jenica then the jenica is negro. If someone roll the jenica then they need the arliene. The golda mistrust the jenica.", "logic": "\nFoal(jenica, arliene)\nFoal(jenica, golda)\nNegro(arliene)\nRoll(arliene, jenica)\nRoll(arliene, golda)\nFoal(arliene, golda)\nMistrust(arliene, golda)\nCanonical(golda)\nRoll(golda, jenica)\nFoal(golda, jenica)\nforall x (Roll(x, golda) -> Roll(x, arliene))\nforall x (Foal(x, arliene) and Roll(arliene, golda) -> Mistrust(x, arliene))\nforall x (Foal(x, arliene) -> Negro(arliene))\nforall x (Mistrust(x, arliene) and Roll(arliene, golda) -> Foal(x, jenica))\nforall x (Roll(x, jenica) -> Negro(jenica))\nforall x (Roll(x, jenica) -> Foal(x, arliene))\n\nMistrust(golda, jenica)\n\nMistrust(golda, jenica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The ariela tattle the oran. The ariela tattle the stanleigh. The oran is unawed. The oran busy the ariela. The oran busy the stanleigh. The oran tattle the stanleigh. The oran poke the stanleigh. The stanleigh is orderly. The stanleigh busy the ariela. The stanleigh tattle the ariela. If someone busy the stanleigh then they like the oran. If someone tattle the oran and the oran busy the stanleigh then they visit the oran. If someone tattle the oran then the oran is unawed. If someone poke the oran and the oran busy the stanleigh then they need the ariela. If someone busy the ariela then the ariela is unawed. If someone busy the ariela then they need the oran. The stanleigh is not unawed.", "logic": "\nTattle(ariela, oran)\nTattle(ariela, stanleigh)\nUnawed(oran)\nBusy(oran, ariela)\nBusy(oran, stanleigh)\nTattle(oran, stanleigh)\nPoke(oran, stanleigh)\nOrderly(stanleigh)\nBusy(stanleigh, ariela)\nTattle(stanleigh, ariela)\nforall x (Busy(x, stanleigh) -> Busy(x, oran))\nforall x (Tattle(x, oran) and Busy(oran, stanleigh) -> Poke(x, oran))\nforall x (Tattle(x, oran) -> Unawed(oran))\nforall x (Poke(x, oran) and Busy(oran, stanleigh) -> Tattle(x, ariela))\nforall x (Busy(x, ariela) -> Unawed(ariela))\nforall x (Busy(x, ariela) -> Tattle(x, oran))\n\nnot Unawed(stanleigh)\n\nnot Unawed(stanleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The ethelind sheathe the dunc. The ethelind sheathe the lissy. The dunc is reflex. The dunc exhume the ethelind. The dunc exhume the lissy. The dunc sheathe the lissy. The dunc clangour the lissy. The lissy is handed. The lissy exhume the ethelind. The lissy sheathe the ethelind. If someone exhume the lissy then they like the dunc. If someone sheathe the dunc and the dunc exhume the lissy then they visit the dunc. If someone sheathe the dunc then the dunc is reflex. If someone clangour the dunc and the dunc exhume the lissy then they need the ethelind. If someone exhume the ethelind then the ethelind is reflex. If someone exhume the ethelind then they need the dunc. The dunc clangour the ethelind.", "logic": "\nSheathe(ethelind, dunc)\nSheathe(ethelind, lissy)\nReflex(dunc)\nExhume(dunc, ethelind)\nExhume(dunc, lissy)\nSheathe(dunc, lissy)\nClangour(dunc, lissy)\nHanded(lissy)\nExhume(lissy, ethelind)\nSheathe(lissy, ethelind)\nforall x (Exhume(x, lissy) -> Exhume(x, dunc))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, dunc) and Exhume(dunc, lissy) -> Clangour(x, dunc))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, dunc) -> Reflex(dunc))\nforall x (Clangour(x, dunc) and Exhume(dunc, lissy) -> Sheathe(x, ethelind))\nforall x (Exhume(x, ethelind) -> Reflex(ethelind))\nforall x (Exhume(x, ethelind) -> Sheathe(x, dunc))\n\nClangour(dunc, ethelind)\n\nClangour(dunc, ethelind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The rab summarise the orrin. The rab summarise the costa. The orrin is matte. The orrin miaou the rab. The orrin miaou the costa. The orrin summarise the costa. The orrin dust the costa. The costa is petrifying. The costa miaou the rab. The costa summarise the rab. If someone miaou the costa then they like the orrin. If someone summarise the orrin and the orrin miaou the costa then they visit the orrin. If someone summarise the orrin then the orrin is matte. If someone dust the orrin and the orrin miaou the costa then they need the rab. If someone miaou the rab then the rab is matte. If someone miaou the rab then they need the orrin. The orrin is not petrifying.", "logic": "\nSummarise(rab, orrin)\nSummarise(rab, costa)\nMatte(orrin)\nMiaou(orrin, rab)\nMiaou(orrin, costa)\nSummarise(orrin, costa)\nDust(orrin, costa)\nPetrifying(costa)\nMiaou(costa, rab)\nSummarise(costa, rab)\nforall x (Miaou(x, costa) -> Miaou(x, orrin))\nforall x (Summarise(x, orrin) and Miaou(orrin, costa) -> Dust(x, orrin))\nforall x (Summarise(x, orrin) -> Matte(orrin))\nforall x (Dust(x, orrin) and Miaou(orrin, costa) -> Summarise(x, rab))\nforall x (Miaou(x, rab) -> Matte(rab))\nforall x (Miaou(x, rab) -> Summarise(x, orrin))\n\nnot Petrifying(orrin)\n\nnot Petrifying(orrin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The jimmie fructify the karol. The jimmie fructify the erna. The karol is racist. The karol stiffen the jimmie. The karol stiffen the erna. The karol fructify the erna. The karol asterisk the erna. The erna is eventual. The erna stiffen the jimmie. The erna fructify the jimmie. If someone stiffen the erna then they like the karol. If someone fructify the karol and the karol stiffen the erna then they visit the karol. If someone fructify the karol then the karol is racist. If someone asterisk the karol and the karol stiffen the erna then they need the jimmie. If someone stiffen the jimmie then the jimmie is racist. If someone stiffen the jimmie then they need the karol. The karol is nice.", "logic": "\nFructify(jimmie, karol)\nFructify(jimmie, erna)\nRacist(karol)\nStiffen(karol, jimmie)\nStiffen(karol, erna)\nFructify(karol, erna)\nAsterisk(karol, erna)\nEventual(erna)\nStiffen(erna, jimmie)\nFructify(erna, jimmie)\nforall x (Stiffen(x, erna) -> Stiffen(x, karol))\nforall x (Fructify(x, karol) and Stiffen(karol, erna) -> Asterisk(x, karol))\nforall x (Fructify(x, karol) -> Racist(karol))\nforall x (Asterisk(x, karol) and Stiffen(karol, erna) -> Fructify(x, jimmie))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, jimmie) -> Racist(jimmie))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, jimmie) -> Fructify(x, karol))\n\nNice(karol)\n\nNice(karol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The clarance besot the wenonah. The clarance identify the ewan. The wenonah besot the ewan. The ewan besot the wenonah. The ewan identify the clarance. The ewan identify the wenonah. The ewan curb the clarance. If something is weblike then it identify the ewan. If something identify the wenonah and the wenonah besot the clarance then it curb the wenonah. If something identify the wenonah then the wenonah curb the ewan. If something identify the wenonah then the wenonah curb the ewan. If something curb the ewan and the ewan identify the wenonah then the wenonah is weblike. If the wenonah is goddamn and the wenonah besot the ewan then the ewan is mensal. If something is weblike and it curb the clarance then it curb the wenonah. If something curb the clarance then it besot the clarance. The wenonah besot the ewan.", "logic": "\nBesot(clarance, wenonah)\nIdentify(clarance, ewan)\nBesot(wenonah, ewan)\nBesot(ewan, wenonah)\nIdentify(ewan, clarance)\nIdentify(ewan, wenonah)\nCurb(ewan, clarance)\nforall x (Weblike(x) -> Identify(x, ewan))\nforall x (Identify(x, wenonah) and Besot(wenonah, clarance) -> Curb(x, wenonah))\nforall x (Identify(x, wenonah) -> Curb(wenonah, ewan))\nforall x (Identify(x, wenonah) -> Curb(wenonah, ewan))\nforall x (Curb(x, ewan) and Identify(ewan, wenonah) -> Weblike(wenonah))\nGoddamn(wenonah) and Besot(wenonah, ewan) -> Mensal(ewan)\nforall x (Weblike(x) and Curb(x, clarance) -> Curb(x, wenonah))\nforall x (Curb(x, clarance) -> Besot(x, clarance))\n\nBesot(wenonah, ewan)\n\ntherefore Besot(wenonah, ewan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The windham spatter the bessie. The windham celebrate the spencer. The bessie spatter the spencer. The spencer spatter the bessie. The spencer celebrate the windham. The spencer celebrate the bessie. The spencer plastinate the windham. If something is diseased then it celebrate the spencer. If something celebrate the bessie and the bessie spatter the windham then it plastinate the bessie. If something celebrate the bessie then the bessie plastinate the spencer. If something celebrate the bessie then the bessie plastinate the spencer. If something plastinate the spencer and the spencer celebrate the bessie then the bessie is diseased. If the bessie is ineffable and the bessie spatter the spencer then the spencer is bullnecked. If something is diseased and it plastinate the windham then it plastinate the bessie. If something plastinate the windham then it spatter the windham. The bessie does not eat the spencer.", "logic": "\nSpatter(windham, bessie)\nCelebrate(windham, spencer)\nSpatter(bessie, spencer)\nSpatter(spencer, bessie)\nCelebrate(spencer, windham)\nCelebrate(spencer, bessie)\nPlastinate(spencer, windham)\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> Celebrate(x, spencer))\nforall x (Celebrate(x, bessie) and Spatter(bessie, windham) -> Plastinate(x, bessie))\nforall x (Celebrate(x, bessie) -> Plastinate(bessie, spencer))\nforall x (Celebrate(x, bessie) -> Plastinate(bessie, spencer))\nforall x (Plastinate(x, spencer) and Celebrate(spencer, bessie) -> Diseased(bessie))\nIneffable(bessie) and Spatter(bessie, spencer) -> Bullnecked(spencer)\nforall x (Diseased(x) and Plastinate(x, windham) -> Plastinate(x, bessie))\nforall x (Plastinate(x, windham) -> Spatter(x, windham))\n\nnot Spatter(bessie, spencer)\n\ntherefore Spatter(bessie, spencer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The aubert flap the selena. The aubert obliterate the derk. The selena flap the derk. The derk flap the selena. The derk obliterate the aubert. The derk obliterate the selena. The derk potentiate the aubert. If something is wanted then it obliterate the derk. If something obliterate the selena and the selena flap the aubert then it potentiate the selena. If something obliterate the selena then the selena potentiate the derk. If something obliterate the selena then the selena potentiate the derk. If something potentiate the derk and the derk obliterate the selena then the selena is wanted. If the selena is groveling and the selena flap the derk then the derk is ungallant. If something is wanted and it potentiate the aubert then it potentiate the selena. If something potentiate the aubert then it flap the aubert. The derk flap the aubert.", "logic": "\nFlap(aubert, selena)\nObliterate(aubert, derk)\nFlap(selena, derk)\nFlap(derk, selena)\nObliterate(derk, aubert)\nObliterate(derk, selena)\nPotentiate(derk, aubert)\nforall x (Wanted(x) -> Obliterate(x, derk))\nforall x (Obliterate(x, selena) and Flap(selena, aubert) -> Potentiate(x, selena))\nforall x (Obliterate(x, selena) -> Potentiate(selena, derk))\nforall x (Obliterate(x, selena) -> Potentiate(selena, derk))\nforall x (Potentiate(x, derk) and Obliterate(derk, selena) -> Wanted(selena))\nGroveling(selena) and Flap(selena, derk) -> Ungallant(derk)\nforall x (Wanted(x) and Potentiate(x, aubert) -> Potentiate(x, selena))\nforall x (Potentiate(x, aubert) -> Flap(x, aubert))\n\nFlap(derk, aubert)\n\nPotentiate(derk, aubert) and forall x (Potentiate(x, aubert) -> Flap(x, aubert)) -> therefore Flap(derk, aubert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The noami disregard the tallia. The noami desorb the laverna. The tallia disregard the laverna. The laverna disregard the tallia. The laverna desorb the noami. The laverna desorb the tallia. The laverna reduce the noami. If something is colonial then it desorb the laverna. If something desorb the tallia and the tallia disregard the noami then it reduce the tallia. If something desorb the tallia then the tallia reduce the laverna. If something desorb the tallia then the tallia reduce the laverna. If something reduce the laverna and the laverna desorb the tallia then the tallia is colonial. If the tallia is iraki and the tallia disregard the laverna then the laverna is pledged. If something is colonial and it reduce the noami then it reduce the tallia. If something reduce the noami then it disregard the noami. The laverna does not eat the noami.", "logic": "\nDisregard(noami, tallia)\nDesorb(noami, laverna)\nDisregard(tallia, laverna)\nDisregard(laverna, tallia)\nDesorb(laverna, noami)\nDesorb(laverna, tallia)\nReduce(laverna, noami)\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Desorb(x, laverna))\nforall x (Desorb(x, tallia) and Disregard(tallia, noami) -> Reduce(x, tallia))\nforall x (Desorb(x, tallia) -> Reduce(tallia, laverna))\nforall x (Desorb(x, tallia) -> Reduce(tallia, laverna))\nforall x (Reduce(x, laverna) and Desorb(laverna, tallia) -> Colonial(tallia))\nIraki(tallia) and Disregard(tallia, laverna) -> Pledged(laverna)\nforall x (Colonial(x) and Reduce(x, noami) -> Reduce(x, tallia))\nforall x (Reduce(x, noami) -> Disregard(x, noami))\n\nnot Disregard(laverna, noami)\n\nReduce(laverna, noami) and forall x (Reduce(x, noami) -> Disregard(x, noami)) -> therefore Disregard(laverna, noami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The euphemia coin the dino. The euphemia brandmark the paige. The dino coin the paige. The paige coin the dino. The paige brandmark the euphemia. The paige brandmark the dino. The paige spin the euphemia. If something is pacifist then it brandmark the paige. If something brandmark the dino and the dino coin the euphemia then it spin the dino. If something brandmark the dino then the dino spin the paige. If something brandmark the dino then the dino spin the paige. If something spin the paige and the paige brandmark the dino then the dino is pacifist. If the dino is sadducean and the dino coin the paige then the paige is hardcover. If something is pacifist and it spin the euphemia then it spin the dino. If something spin the euphemia then it coin the euphemia. The dino is pacifist.", "logic": "\nCoin(euphemia, dino)\nBrandmark(euphemia, paige)\nCoin(dino, paige)\nCoin(paige, dino)\nBrandmark(paige, euphemia)\nBrandmark(paige, dino)\nSpin(paige, euphemia)\nforall x (Pacifist(x) -> Brandmark(x, paige))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, dino) and Coin(dino, euphemia) -> Spin(x, dino))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, dino) -> Spin(dino, paige))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, dino) -> Spin(dino, paige))\nforall x (Spin(x, paige) and Brandmark(paige, dino) -> Pacifist(dino))\nSadducean(dino) and Coin(dino, paige) -> Hardcover(paige)\nforall x (Pacifist(x) and Spin(x, euphemia) -> Spin(x, dino))\nforall x (Spin(x, euphemia) -> Coin(x, euphemia))\n\nPacifist(dino)\n\nBrandmark(paige, dino) and forall x (Brandmark(x, dino) -> Spin(dino, paige)) -> therefore Spin(dino, paige) Spin(dino, paige) and Brandmark(paige, dino) and forall x (Spin(x, paige) and Brandmark(paige, dino) -> Pacifist(dino)) -> therefore Pacifist(dino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The barri peculate the jennifer. The barri caterwaul the melanie. The jennifer peculate the melanie. The melanie peculate the jennifer. The melanie caterwaul the barri. The melanie caterwaul the jennifer. The melanie panic the barri. If something is knockout then it caterwaul the melanie. If something caterwaul the jennifer and the jennifer peculate the barri then it panic the jennifer. If something caterwaul the jennifer then the jennifer panic the melanie. If something caterwaul the jennifer then the jennifer panic the melanie. If something panic the melanie and the melanie caterwaul the jennifer then the jennifer is knockout. If the jennifer is mozambican and the jennifer peculate the melanie then the melanie is decompound. If something is knockout and it panic the barri then it panic the jennifer. If something panic the barri then it peculate the barri. The jennifer is not knockout.", "logic": "\nPeculate(barri, jennifer)\nCaterwaul(barri, melanie)\nPeculate(jennifer, melanie)\nPeculate(melanie, jennifer)\nCaterwaul(melanie, barri)\nCaterwaul(melanie, jennifer)\nPanic(melanie, barri)\nforall x (Knockout(x) -> Caterwaul(x, melanie))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, jennifer) and Peculate(jennifer, barri) -> Panic(x, jennifer))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, jennifer) -> Panic(jennifer, melanie))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, jennifer) -> Panic(jennifer, melanie))\nforall x (Panic(x, melanie) and Caterwaul(melanie, jennifer) -> Knockout(jennifer))\nMozambican(jennifer) and Peculate(jennifer, melanie) -> Decompound(melanie)\nforall x (Knockout(x) and Panic(x, barri) -> Panic(x, jennifer))\nforall x (Panic(x, barri) -> Peculate(x, barri))\n\nnot Knockout(jennifer)\n\nCaterwaul(melanie, jennifer) and forall x (Caterwaul(x, jennifer) -> Panic(jennifer, melanie)) -> therefore Panic(jennifer, melanie) Panic(jennifer, melanie) and Caterwaul(melanie, jennifer) and forall x (Panic(x, melanie) and Caterwaul(melanie, jennifer) -> Knockout(jennifer)) -> therefore Knockout(jennifer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The tanner decree the jojo. The tanner lament the harriot. The jojo decree the harriot. The harriot decree the jojo. The harriot lament the tanner. The harriot lament the jojo. The harriot overgorge the tanner. If something is uncheerful then it lament the harriot. If something lament the jojo and the jojo decree the tanner then it overgorge the jojo. If something lament the jojo then the jojo overgorge the harriot. If something lament the jojo then the jojo overgorge the harriot. If something overgorge the harriot and the harriot lament the jojo then the jojo is uncheerful. If the jojo is brachiopod and the jojo decree the harriot then the harriot is beloved. If something is uncheerful and it overgorge the tanner then it overgorge the jojo. If something overgorge the tanner then it decree the tanner. The jojo lament the harriot.", "logic": "\nDecree(tanner, jojo)\nLament(tanner, harriot)\nDecree(jojo, harriot)\nDecree(harriot, jojo)\nLament(harriot, tanner)\nLament(harriot, jojo)\nOvergorge(harriot, tanner)\nforall x (Uncheerful(x) -> Lament(x, harriot))\nforall x (Lament(x, jojo) and Decree(jojo, tanner) -> Overgorge(x, jojo))\nforall x (Lament(x, jojo) -> Overgorge(jojo, harriot))\nforall x (Lament(x, jojo) -> Overgorge(jojo, harriot))\nforall x (Overgorge(x, harriot) and Lament(harriot, jojo) -> Uncheerful(jojo))\nBrachiopod(jojo) and Decree(jojo, harriot) -> Beloved(harriot)\nforall x (Uncheerful(x) and Overgorge(x, tanner) -> Overgorge(x, jojo))\nforall x (Overgorge(x, tanner) -> Decree(x, tanner))\n\nLament(jojo, harriot)\n\nLament(harriot, jojo) and forall x (Lament(x, jojo) -> Overgorge(jojo, harriot)) -> therefore Overgorge(jojo, harriot) Overgorge(jojo, harriot) and Lament(harriot, jojo) and forall x (Overgorge(x, harriot) and Lament(harriot, jojo) -> Uncheerful(jojo)) -> therefore Uncheerful(jojo) Uncheerful(jojo) and forall x (Uncheerful(x) -> Lament(x, harriot)) -> therefore Lament(jojo, harriot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The gaston scheme the durward. The gaston come the reeba. The durward scheme the reeba. The reeba scheme the durward. The reeba come the gaston. The reeba come the durward. The reeba churr the gaston. If something is median then it come the reeba. If something come the durward and the durward scheme the gaston then it churr the durward. If something come the durward then the durward churr the reeba. If something come the durward then the durward churr the reeba. If something churr the reeba and the reeba come the durward then the durward is median. If the durward is periwigged and the durward scheme the reeba then the reeba is stifling. If something is median and it churr the gaston then it churr the durward. If something churr the gaston then it scheme the gaston. The durward does not like the reeba.", "logic": "\nScheme(gaston, durward)\nCome(gaston, reeba)\nScheme(durward, reeba)\nScheme(reeba, durward)\nCome(reeba, gaston)\nCome(reeba, durward)\nChurr(reeba, gaston)\nforall x (Median(x) -> Come(x, reeba))\nforall x (Come(x, durward) and Scheme(durward, gaston) -> Churr(x, durward))\nforall x (Come(x, durward) -> Churr(durward, reeba))\nforall x (Come(x, durward) -> Churr(durward, reeba))\nforall x (Churr(x, reeba) and Come(reeba, durward) -> Median(durward))\nPeriwigged(durward) and Scheme(durward, reeba) -> Stifling(reeba)\nforall x (Median(x) and Churr(x, gaston) -> Churr(x, durward))\nforall x (Churr(x, gaston) -> Scheme(x, gaston))\n\nnot Come(durward, reeba)\n\nCome(reeba, durward) and forall x (Come(x, durward) -> Churr(durward, reeba)) -> therefore Churr(durward, reeba) Churr(durward, reeba) and Come(reeba, durward) and forall x (Churr(x, reeba) and Come(reeba, durward) -> Median(durward)) -> therefore Median(durward) Median(durward) and forall x (Median(x) -> Come(x, reeba)) -> therefore Come(durward, reeba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The bobine enmesh the jeniece. The bobine bong the klaus. The jeniece enmesh the klaus. The klaus enmesh the jeniece. The klaus bong the bobine. The klaus bong the jeniece. The klaus coach the bobine. If something is lucid then it bong the klaus. If something bong the jeniece and the jeniece enmesh the bobine then it coach the jeniece. If something bong the jeniece then the jeniece coach the klaus. If something bong the jeniece then the jeniece coach the klaus. If something coach the klaus and the klaus bong the jeniece then the jeniece is lucid. If the jeniece is aeriferous and the jeniece enmesh the klaus then the klaus is choleraic. If something is lucid and it coach the bobine then it coach the jeniece. If something coach the bobine then it enmesh the bobine. The klaus is not choleraic.", "logic": "\nEnmesh(bobine, jeniece)\nBong(bobine, klaus)\nEnmesh(jeniece, klaus)\nEnmesh(klaus, jeniece)\nBong(klaus, bobine)\nBong(klaus, jeniece)\nCoach(klaus, bobine)\nforall x (Lucid(x) -> Bong(x, klaus))\nforall x (Bong(x, jeniece) and Enmesh(jeniece, bobine) -> Coach(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Bong(x, jeniece) -> Coach(jeniece, klaus))\nforall x (Bong(x, jeniece) -> Coach(jeniece, klaus))\nforall x (Coach(x, klaus) and Bong(klaus, jeniece) -> Lucid(jeniece))\nAeriferous(jeniece) and Enmesh(jeniece, klaus) -> Choleraic(klaus)\nforall x (Lucid(x) and Coach(x, bobine) -> Coach(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Coach(x, bobine) -> Enmesh(x, bobine))\n\nnot Choleraic(klaus)\n\nAeriferous(jeniece) and Enmesh(jeniece, klaus) -> Choleraic(klaus) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The alvina manumit the adiana. The alvina care the joel. The adiana manumit the joel. The joel manumit the adiana. The joel care the alvina. The joel care the adiana. The joel beseech the alvina. If something is profitless then it care the joel. If something care the adiana and the adiana manumit the alvina then it beseech the adiana. If something care the adiana then the adiana beseech the joel. If something care the adiana then the adiana beseech the joel. If something beseech the joel and the joel care the adiana then the adiana is profitless. If the adiana is reassured and the adiana manumit the joel then the joel is taken. If something is profitless and it beseech the alvina then it beseech the adiana. If something beseech the alvina then it manumit the alvina. The adiana manumit the alvina.", "logic": "\nManumit(alvina, adiana)\nCare(alvina, joel)\nManumit(adiana, joel)\nManumit(joel, adiana)\nCare(joel, alvina)\nCare(joel, adiana)\nBeseech(joel, alvina)\nforall x (Profitless(x) -> Care(x, joel))\nforall x (Care(x, adiana) and Manumit(adiana, alvina) -> Beseech(x, adiana))\nforall x (Care(x, adiana) -> Beseech(adiana, joel))\nforall x (Care(x, adiana) -> Beseech(adiana, joel))\nforall x (Beseech(x, joel) and Care(joel, adiana) -> Profitless(adiana))\nReassured(adiana) and Manumit(adiana, joel) -> Taken(joel)\nforall x (Profitless(x) and Beseech(x, alvina) -> Beseech(x, adiana))\nforall x (Beseech(x, alvina) -> Manumit(x, alvina))\n\nManumit(adiana, alvina)\n\nforall x (Beseech(x, alvina) -> Manumit(x, alvina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The friedrich prove the dana. The friedrich childproof the giralda. The dana prove the giralda. The giralda prove the dana. The giralda childproof the friedrich. The giralda childproof the dana. The giralda torture the friedrich. If something is indigent then it childproof the giralda. If something childproof the dana and the dana prove the friedrich then it torture the dana. If something childproof the dana then the dana torture the giralda. If something childproof the dana then the dana torture the giralda. If something torture the giralda and the giralda childproof the dana then the dana is indigent. If the dana is faulty and the dana prove the giralda then the giralda is merciless. If something is indigent and it torture the friedrich then it torture the dana. If something torture the friedrich then it prove the friedrich. The dana does not need the dana.", "logic": "\nProve(friedrich, dana)\nChildproof(friedrich, giralda)\nProve(dana, giralda)\nProve(giralda, dana)\nChildproof(giralda, friedrich)\nChildproof(giralda, dana)\nTorture(giralda, friedrich)\nforall x (Indigent(x) -> Childproof(x, giralda))\nforall x (Childproof(x, dana) and Prove(dana, friedrich) -> Torture(x, dana))\nforall x (Childproof(x, dana) -> Torture(dana, giralda))\nforall x (Childproof(x, dana) -> Torture(dana, giralda))\nforall x (Torture(x, giralda) and Childproof(giralda, dana) -> Indigent(dana))\nFaulty(dana) and Prove(dana, giralda) -> Merciless(giralda)\nforall x (Indigent(x) and Torture(x, friedrich) -> Torture(x, dana))\nforall x (Torture(x, friedrich) -> Prove(x, friedrich))\n\nnot Torture(dana, dana)\n\nforall x (Childproof(x, dana) and Prove(dana, friedrich) -> Torture(x, dana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The corina unstring the kayley. The corina reject the romeo. The kayley unstring the romeo. The romeo unstring the kayley. The romeo reject the corina. The romeo reject the kayley. The romeo frizz the corina. If something is hifalutin then it reject the romeo. If something reject the kayley and the kayley unstring the corina then it frizz the kayley. If something reject the kayley then the kayley frizz the romeo. If something reject the kayley then the kayley frizz the romeo. If something frizz the romeo and the romeo reject the kayley then the kayley is hifalutin. If the kayley is baneful and the kayley unstring the romeo then the romeo is bismuthal. If something is hifalutin and it frizz the corina then it frizz the kayley. If something frizz the corina then it unstring the corina. The corina frizz the kayley.", "logic": "\nUnstring(corina, kayley)\nReject(corina, romeo)\nUnstring(kayley, romeo)\nUnstring(romeo, kayley)\nReject(romeo, corina)\nReject(romeo, kayley)\nFrizz(romeo, corina)\nforall x (Hifalutin(x) -> Reject(x, romeo))\nforall x (Reject(x, kayley) and Unstring(kayley, corina) -> Frizz(x, kayley))\nforall x (Reject(x, kayley) -> Frizz(kayley, romeo))\nforall x (Reject(x, kayley) -> Frizz(kayley, romeo))\nforall x (Frizz(x, romeo) and Reject(romeo, kayley) -> Hifalutin(kayley))\nBaneful(kayley) and Unstring(kayley, romeo) -> Bismuthal(romeo)\nforall x (Hifalutin(x) and Frizz(x, corina) -> Frizz(x, kayley))\nforall x (Frizz(x, corina) -> Unstring(x, corina))\n\nFrizz(corina, kayley)\n\nforall x (Reject(x, kayley) and Unstring(kayley, corina) -> Frizz(x, kayley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The shel reship the reginauld. The shel solarize the robinson. The reginauld reship the robinson. The robinson reship the reginauld. The robinson solarize the shel. The robinson solarize the reginauld. The robinson unbalance the shel. If something is torn then it solarize the robinson. If something solarize the reginauld and the reginauld reship the shel then it unbalance the reginauld. If something solarize the reginauld then the reginauld unbalance the robinson. If something solarize the reginauld then the reginauld unbalance the robinson. If something unbalance the robinson and the robinson solarize the reginauld then the reginauld is torn. If the reginauld is laggard and the reginauld reship the robinson then the robinson is caprine. If something is torn and it unbalance the shel then it unbalance the reginauld. If something unbalance the shel then it reship the shel. The shel is not laggard.", "logic": "\nReship(shel, reginauld)\nSolarize(shel, robinson)\nReship(reginauld, robinson)\nReship(robinson, reginauld)\nSolarize(robinson, shel)\nSolarize(robinson, reginauld)\nUnbalance(robinson, shel)\nforall x (Torn(x) -> Solarize(x, robinson))\nforall x (Solarize(x, reginauld) and Reship(reginauld, shel) -> Unbalance(x, reginauld))\nforall x (Solarize(x, reginauld) -> Unbalance(reginauld, robinson))\nforall x (Solarize(x, reginauld) -> Unbalance(reginauld, robinson))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, robinson) and Solarize(robinson, reginauld) -> Torn(reginauld))\nLaggard(reginauld) and Reship(reginauld, robinson) -> Caprine(robinson)\nforall x (Torn(x) and Unbalance(x, shel) -> Unbalance(x, reginauld))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, shel) -> Reship(x, shel))\n\nnot Laggard(shel)\n\nnot Laggard(shel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The janine sequester the hadria. The janine endear the nancee. The hadria sequester the nancee. The nancee sequester the hadria. The nancee endear the janine. The nancee endear the hadria. The nancee furlough the janine. If something is profane then it endear the nancee. If something endear the hadria and the hadria sequester the janine then it furlough the hadria. If something endear the hadria then the hadria furlough the nancee. If something endear the hadria then the hadria furlough the nancee. If something furlough the nancee and the nancee endear the hadria then the hadria is profane. If the hadria is unlighted and the hadria sequester the nancee then the nancee is lined. If something is profane and it furlough the janine then it furlough the hadria. If something furlough the janine then it sequester the janine. The janine is rough.", "logic": "\nSequester(janine, hadria)\nEndear(janine, nancee)\nSequester(hadria, nancee)\nSequester(nancee, hadria)\nEndear(nancee, janine)\nEndear(nancee, hadria)\nFurlough(nancee, janine)\nforall x (Profane(x) -> Endear(x, nancee))\nforall x (Endear(x, hadria) and Sequester(hadria, janine) -> Furlough(x, hadria))\nforall x (Endear(x, hadria) -> Furlough(hadria, nancee))\nforall x (Endear(x, hadria) -> Furlough(hadria, nancee))\nforall x (Furlough(x, nancee) and Endear(nancee, hadria) -> Profane(hadria))\nUnlighted(hadria) and Sequester(hadria, nancee) -> Lined(nancee)\nforall x (Profane(x) and Furlough(x, janine) -> Furlough(x, hadria))\nforall x (Furlough(x, janine) -> Sequester(x, janine))\n\nRough(janine)\n\nRough(janine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The torey select the giselle. The torey whistle the connor. The giselle select the connor. The connor select the giselle. The connor whistle the torey. The connor whistle the giselle. The connor transude the torey. If something is jural then it whistle the connor. If something whistle the giselle and the giselle select the torey then it transude the giselle. If something whistle the giselle then the giselle transude the connor. If something whistle the giselle then the giselle transude the connor. If something transude the connor and the connor whistle the giselle then the giselle is jural. If the giselle is allelic and the giselle select the connor then the connor is newfound. If something is jural and it transude the torey then it transude the giselle. If something transude the torey then it select the torey. The connor is not jural.", "logic": "\nSelect(torey, giselle)\nWhistle(torey, connor)\nSelect(giselle, connor)\nSelect(connor, giselle)\nWhistle(connor, torey)\nWhistle(connor, giselle)\nTransude(connor, torey)\nforall x (Jural(x) -> Whistle(x, connor))\nforall x (Whistle(x, giselle) and Select(giselle, torey) -> Transude(x, giselle))\nforall x (Whistle(x, giselle) -> Transude(giselle, connor))\nforall x (Whistle(x, giselle) -> Transude(giselle, connor))\nforall x (Transude(x, connor) and Whistle(connor, giselle) -> Jural(giselle))\nAllelic(giselle) and Select(giselle, connor) -> Newfound(connor)\nforall x (Jural(x) and Transude(x, torey) -> Transude(x, giselle))\nforall x (Transude(x, torey) -> Select(x, torey))\n\nnot Jural(connor)\n\nnot Jural(connor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The alexander boast the aline. The alexander mesmerize the hanna. The aline boast the hanna. The hanna boast the aline. The hanna mesmerize the alexander. The hanna mesmerize the aline. The hanna open the alexander. If something is advertent then it mesmerize the hanna. If something mesmerize the aline and the aline boast the alexander then it open the aline. If something mesmerize the aline then the aline open the hanna. If something mesmerize the aline then the aline open the hanna. If something open the hanna and the hanna mesmerize the aline then the aline is advertent. If the aline is seventh and the aline boast the hanna then the hanna is uppermost. If something is advertent and it open the alexander then it open the aline. If something open the alexander then it boast the alexander. The hanna is rough.", "logic": "\nBoast(alexander, aline)\nMesmerize(alexander, hanna)\nBoast(aline, hanna)\nBoast(hanna, aline)\nMesmerize(hanna, alexander)\nMesmerize(hanna, aline)\nOpen(hanna, alexander)\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> Mesmerize(x, hanna))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, aline) and Boast(aline, alexander) -> Open(x, aline))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, aline) -> Open(aline, hanna))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, aline) -> Open(aline, hanna))\nforall x (Open(x, hanna) and Mesmerize(hanna, aline) -> Advertent(aline))\nSeventh(aline) and Boast(aline, hanna) -> Uppermost(hanna)\nforall x (Advertent(x) and Open(x, alexander) -> Open(x, aline))\nforall x (Open(x, alexander) -> Boast(x, alexander))\n\nRough(hanna)\n\nRough(hanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The maryjane munch the cleland. The maryjane does not eat the dareen. The maryjane knit the cleland. The maryjane knit the dareen. The maryjane does not visit the cleland. The maryjane favor the dareen. The cleland is enlivened. The cleland does not see the maryjane. The cleland favor the maryjane. The dareen is not womanish. The dareen is enlivened. The dareen is microbic. The dareen knit the maryjane. The dareen favor the maryjane. The dareen favor the cleland. If something favor the dareen and it knit the maryjane then the maryjane is womanish. If the maryjane favor the dareen and the dareen knit the maryjane then the dareen munch the cleland. If something munch the cleland and it is microbic then it favor the dareen. If something favor the dareen and it knit the dareen then the dareen favor the cleland. If something munch the dareen then the dareen knit the maryjane. If the cleland is assamese and the cleland does not visit the dareen then the dareen is enlivened. The cleland does not see the maryjane.", "logic": "\nMunch(maryjane, cleland)\nnot Munch(maryjane, dareen)\nKnit(maryjane, cleland)\nKnit(maryjane, dareen)\nnot Favor(maryjane, cleland)\nFavor(maryjane, dareen)\nEnlivened(cleland)\nnot Knit(cleland, maryjane)\nFavor(cleland, maryjane)\nnot Womanish(dareen)\nEnlivened(dareen)\nMicrobic(dareen)\nKnit(dareen, maryjane)\nFavor(dareen, maryjane)\nFavor(dareen, cleland)\nforall x (Favor(x, dareen) and Knit(x, maryjane) -> Womanish(maryjane))\nFavor(maryjane, dareen) and Knit(dareen, maryjane) -> Munch(dareen, cleland)\nforall x (Munch(x, cleland) and Microbic(x) -> Favor(x, dareen))\nforall x (Favor(x, dareen) and Knit(x, dareen) -> Favor(dareen, cleland))\nforall x (Munch(x, dareen) -> Knit(dareen, maryjane))\nAssamese(cleland) and not Favor(cleland, dareen) -> Enlivened(dareen)\n\nnot Knit(cleland, maryjane)\n\ntherefore not Knit(cleland, maryjane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The elisabeth perturb the brooks. The elisabeth does not eat the gigi. The elisabeth footle the brooks. The elisabeth footle the gigi. The elisabeth does not visit the brooks. The elisabeth peek the gigi. The brooks is fogbound. The brooks does not see the elisabeth. The brooks peek the elisabeth. The gigi is not accustomed. The gigi is fogbound. The gigi is palmlike. The gigi footle the elisabeth. The gigi peek the elisabeth. The gigi peek the brooks. If something peek the gigi and it footle the elisabeth then the elisabeth is accustomed. If the elisabeth peek the gigi and the gigi footle the elisabeth then the gigi perturb the brooks. If something perturb the brooks and it is palmlike then it peek the gigi. If something peek the gigi and it footle the gigi then the gigi peek the brooks. If something perturb the gigi then the gigi footle the elisabeth. If the brooks is clamant and the brooks does not visit the gigi then the gigi is fogbound. The elisabeth does not eat the brooks.", "logic": "\nPerturb(elisabeth, brooks)\nnot Perturb(elisabeth, gigi)\nFootle(elisabeth, brooks)\nFootle(elisabeth, gigi)\nnot Peek(elisabeth, brooks)\nPeek(elisabeth, gigi)\nFogbound(brooks)\nnot Footle(brooks, elisabeth)\nPeek(brooks, elisabeth)\nnot Accustomed(gigi)\nFogbound(gigi)\nPalmlike(gigi)\nFootle(gigi, elisabeth)\nPeek(gigi, elisabeth)\nPeek(gigi, brooks)\nforall x (Peek(x, gigi) and Footle(x, elisabeth) -> Accustomed(elisabeth))\nPeek(elisabeth, gigi) and Footle(gigi, elisabeth) -> Perturb(gigi, brooks)\nforall x (Perturb(x, brooks) and Palmlike(x) -> Peek(x, gigi))\nforall x (Peek(x, gigi) and Footle(x, gigi) -> Peek(gigi, brooks))\nforall x (Perturb(x, gigi) -> Footle(gigi, elisabeth))\nClamant(brooks) and not Peek(brooks, gigi) -> Fogbound(gigi)\n\nnot Perturb(elisabeth, brooks)\n\ntherefore Perturb(elisabeth, brooks)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The kaylee crisp the christine. The kaylee does not eat the ginelle. The kaylee finalize the christine. The kaylee finalize the ginelle. The kaylee does not visit the christine. The kaylee disinfect the ginelle. The christine is heliacal. The christine does not see the kaylee. The christine disinfect the kaylee. The ginelle is not autogamous. The ginelle is heliacal. The ginelle is scythian. The ginelle finalize the kaylee. The ginelle disinfect the kaylee. The ginelle disinfect the christine. If something disinfect the ginelle and it finalize the kaylee then the kaylee is autogamous. If the kaylee disinfect the ginelle and the ginelle finalize the kaylee then the ginelle crisp the christine. If something crisp the christine and it is scythian then it disinfect the ginelle. If something disinfect the ginelle and it finalize the ginelle then the ginelle disinfect the christine. If something crisp the ginelle then the ginelle finalize the kaylee. If the christine is acaudate and the christine does not visit the ginelle then the ginelle is heliacal. The ginelle crisp the christine.", "logic": "\nCrisp(kaylee, christine)\nnot Crisp(kaylee, ginelle)\nFinalize(kaylee, christine)\nFinalize(kaylee, ginelle)\nnot Disinfect(kaylee, christine)\nDisinfect(kaylee, ginelle)\nHeliacal(christine)\nnot Finalize(christine, kaylee)\nDisinfect(christine, kaylee)\nnot Autogamous(ginelle)\nHeliacal(ginelle)\nScythian(ginelle)\nFinalize(ginelle, kaylee)\nDisinfect(ginelle, kaylee)\nDisinfect(ginelle, christine)\nforall x (Disinfect(x, ginelle) and Finalize(x, kaylee) -> Autogamous(kaylee))\nDisinfect(kaylee, ginelle) and Finalize(ginelle, kaylee) -> Crisp(ginelle, christine)\nforall x (Crisp(x, christine) and Scythian(x) -> Disinfect(x, ginelle))\nforall x (Disinfect(x, ginelle) and Finalize(x, ginelle) -> Disinfect(ginelle, christine))\nforall x (Crisp(x, ginelle) -> Finalize(ginelle, kaylee))\nAcaudate(christine) and not Disinfect(christine, ginelle) -> Heliacal(ginelle)\n\nCrisp(ginelle, christine)\n\nDisinfect(kaylee, ginelle) and Finalize(ginelle, kaylee) and Disinfect(kaylee, ginelle) and Finalize(ginelle, kaylee) -> Crisp(ginelle, christine) -> therefore Crisp(ginelle, christine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The ruthy baptise the randene. The ruthy does not eat the edgar. The ruthy nasalize the randene. The ruthy nasalize the edgar. The ruthy does not visit the randene. The ruthy engross the edgar. The randene is acetous. The randene does not see the ruthy. The randene engross the ruthy. The edgar is not thirteenth. The edgar is acetous. The edgar is cured. The edgar nasalize the ruthy. The edgar engross the ruthy. The edgar engross the randene. If something engross the edgar and it nasalize the ruthy then the ruthy is thirteenth. If the ruthy engross the edgar and the edgar nasalize the ruthy then the edgar baptise the randene. If something baptise the randene and it is cured then it engross the edgar. If something engross the edgar and it nasalize the edgar then the edgar engross the randene. If something baptise the edgar then the edgar nasalize the ruthy. If the randene is papuan and the randene does not visit the edgar then the edgar is acetous. The edgar does not eat the randene.", "logic": "\nBaptise(ruthy, randene)\nnot Baptise(ruthy, edgar)\nNasalize(ruthy, randene)\nNasalize(ruthy, edgar)\nnot Engross(ruthy, randene)\nEngross(ruthy, edgar)\nAcetous(randene)\nnot Nasalize(randene, ruthy)\nEngross(randene, ruthy)\nnot Thirteenth(edgar)\nAcetous(edgar)\nCured(edgar)\nNasalize(edgar, ruthy)\nEngross(edgar, ruthy)\nEngross(edgar, randene)\nforall x (Engross(x, edgar) and Nasalize(x, ruthy) -> Thirteenth(ruthy))\nEngross(ruthy, edgar) and Nasalize(edgar, ruthy) -> Baptise(edgar, randene)\nforall x (Baptise(x, randene) and Cured(x) -> Engross(x, edgar))\nforall x (Engross(x, edgar) and Nasalize(x, edgar) -> Engross(edgar, randene))\nforall x (Baptise(x, edgar) -> Nasalize(edgar, ruthy))\nPapuan(randene) and not Engross(randene, edgar) -> Acetous(edgar)\n\nnot Baptise(edgar, randene)\n\nEngross(ruthy, edgar) and Nasalize(edgar, ruthy) and Engross(ruthy, edgar) and Nasalize(edgar, ruthy) -> Baptise(edgar, randene) -> therefore Baptise(edgar, randene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The desiri chisel the kaitlyn. The desiri does not eat the annalisa. The desiri rededicate the kaitlyn. The desiri rededicate the annalisa. The desiri does not visit the kaitlyn. The desiri rely the annalisa. The kaitlyn is timely. The kaitlyn does not see the desiri. The kaitlyn rely the desiri. The annalisa is not demoniac. The annalisa is timely. The annalisa is unlike. The annalisa rededicate the desiri. The annalisa rely the desiri. The annalisa rely the kaitlyn. If something rely the annalisa and it rededicate the desiri then the desiri is demoniac. If the desiri rely the annalisa and the annalisa rededicate the desiri then the annalisa chisel the kaitlyn. If something chisel the kaitlyn and it is unlike then it rely the annalisa. If something rely the annalisa and it rededicate the annalisa then the annalisa rely the kaitlyn. If something chisel the annalisa then the annalisa rededicate the desiri. If the kaitlyn is pouring and the kaitlyn does not visit the annalisa then the annalisa is timely. The annalisa rely the annalisa.", "logic": "\nChisel(desiri, kaitlyn)\nnot Chisel(desiri, annalisa)\nRededicate(desiri, kaitlyn)\nRededicate(desiri, annalisa)\nnot Rely(desiri, kaitlyn)\nRely(desiri, annalisa)\nTimely(kaitlyn)\nnot Rededicate(kaitlyn, desiri)\nRely(kaitlyn, desiri)\nnot Demoniac(annalisa)\nTimely(annalisa)\nUnlike(annalisa)\nRededicate(annalisa, desiri)\nRely(annalisa, desiri)\nRely(annalisa, kaitlyn)\nforall x (Rely(x, annalisa) and Rededicate(x, desiri) -> Demoniac(desiri))\nRely(desiri, annalisa) and Rededicate(annalisa, desiri) -> Chisel(annalisa, kaitlyn)\nforall x (Chisel(x, kaitlyn) and Unlike(x) -> Rely(x, annalisa))\nforall x (Rely(x, annalisa) and Rededicate(x, annalisa) -> Rely(annalisa, kaitlyn))\nforall x (Chisel(x, annalisa) -> Rededicate(annalisa, desiri))\nPouring(kaitlyn) and not Rely(kaitlyn, annalisa) -> Timely(annalisa)\n\nRely(annalisa, annalisa)\n\nRely(desiri, annalisa) and Rededicate(annalisa, desiri) and Rely(desiri, annalisa) and Rededicate(annalisa, desiri) -> Chisel(annalisa, kaitlyn) -> therefore Chisel(annalisa, kaitlyn) Chisel(annalisa, kaitlyn) and Unlike(annalisa) and forall x (Chisel(x, kaitlyn) and Unlike(x) -> Rely(x, annalisa)) -> therefore Rely(annalisa, annalisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The minna misquote the angelique. The minna does not eat the timothee. The minna flee the angelique. The minna flee the timothee. The minna does not visit the angelique. The minna sterilize the timothee. The angelique is twelfth. The angelique does not see the minna. The angelique sterilize the minna. The timothee is not prepacked. The timothee is twelfth. The timothee is untrod. The timothee flee the minna. The timothee sterilize the minna. The timothee sterilize the angelique. If something sterilize the timothee and it flee the minna then the minna is prepacked. If the minna sterilize the timothee and the timothee flee the minna then the timothee misquote the angelique. If something misquote the angelique and it is untrod then it sterilize the timothee. If something sterilize the timothee and it flee the timothee then the timothee sterilize the angelique. If something misquote the timothee then the timothee flee the minna. If the angelique is generic and the angelique does not visit the timothee then the timothee is twelfth. The timothee does not visit the timothee.", "logic": "\nMisquote(minna, angelique)\nnot Misquote(minna, timothee)\nFlee(minna, angelique)\nFlee(minna, timothee)\nnot Sterilize(minna, angelique)\nSterilize(minna, timothee)\nTwelfth(angelique)\nnot Flee(angelique, minna)\nSterilize(angelique, minna)\nnot Prepacked(timothee)\nTwelfth(timothee)\nUntrod(timothee)\nFlee(timothee, minna)\nSterilize(timothee, minna)\nSterilize(timothee, angelique)\nforall x (Sterilize(x, timothee) and Flee(x, minna) -> Prepacked(minna))\nSterilize(minna, timothee) and Flee(timothee, minna) -> Misquote(timothee, angelique)\nforall x (Misquote(x, angelique) and Untrod(x) -> Sterilize(x, timothee))\nforall x (Sterilize(x, timothee) and Flee(x, timothee) -> Sterilize(timothee, angelique))\nforall x (Misquote(x, timothee) -> Flee(timothee, minna))\nGeneric(angelique) and not Sterilize(angelique, timothee) -> Twelfth(timothee)\n\nnot Sterilize(timothee, timothee)\n\nSterilize(minna, timothee) and Flee(timothee, minna) and Sterilize(minna, timothee) and Flee(timothee, minna) -> Misquote(timothee, angelique) -> therefore Misquote(timothee, angelique) Misquote(timothee, angelique) and Untrod(timothee) and forall x (Misquote(x, angelique) and Untrod(x) -> Sterilize(x, timothee)) -> therefore Sterilize(timothee, timothee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The verene reorder the gerome. The verene does not eat the sergio. The verene vulcanize the gerome. The verene vulcanize the sergio. The verene does not visit the gerome. The verene trace the sergio. The gerome is soapy. The gerome does not see the verene. The gerome trace the verene. The sergio is not plane. The sergio is soapy. The sergio is immaculate. The sergio vulcanize the verene. The sergio trace the verene. The sergio trace the gerome. If something trace the sergio and it vulcanize the verene then the verene is plane. If the verene trace the sergio and the sergio vulcanize the verene then the sergio reorder the gerome. If something reorder the gerome and it is immaculate then it trace the sergio. If something trace the sergio and it vulcanize the sergio then the sergio trace the gerome. If something reorder the sergio then the sergio vulcanize the verene. If the gerome is lordotic and the gerome does not visit the sergio then the sergio is soapy. The verene is plane.", "logic": "\nReorder(verene, gerome)\nnot Reorder(verene, sergio)\nVulcanize(verene, gerome)\nVulcanize(verene, sergio)\nnot Trace(verene, gerome)\nTrace(verene, sergio)\nSoapy(gerome)\nnot Vulcanize(gerome, verene)\nTrace(gerome, verene)\nnot Plane(sergio)\nSoapy(sergio)\nImmaculate(sergio)\nVulcanize(sergio, verene)\nTrace(sergio, verene)\nTrace(sergio, gerome)\nforall x (Trace(x, sergio) and Vulcanize(x, verene) -> Plane(verene))\nTrace(verene, sergio) and Vulcanize(sergio, verene) -> Reorder(sergio, gerome)\nforall x (Reorder(x, gerome) and Immaculate(x) -> Trace(x, sergio))\nforall x (Trace(x, sergio) and Vulcanize(x, sergio) -> Trace(sergio, gerome))\nforall x (Reorder(x, sergio) -> Vulcanize(sergio, verene))\nLordotic(gerome) and not Trace(gerome, sergio) -> Soapy(sergio)\n\nPlane(verene)\n\nTrace(verene, sergio) and Vulcanize(sergio, verene) and Trace(verene, sergio) and Vulcanize(sergio, verene) -> Reorder(sergio, gerome) -> therefore Reorder(sergio, gerome) Reorder(sergio, gerome) and Immaculate(sergio) and forall x (Reorder(x, gerome) and Immaculate(x) -> Trace(x, sergio)) -> therefore Trace(sergio, sergio) Trace(sergio, sergio) and Vulcanize(sergio, verene) and forall x (Trace(x, sergio) and Vulcanize(x, verene) -> Plane(verene)) -> therefore Plane(verene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The elna totalise the eberhard. The elna does not eat the perl. The elna consist the eberhard. The elna consist the perl. The elna does not visit the eberhard. The elna cache the perl. The eberhard is unheaded. The eberhard does not see the elna. The eberhard cache the elna. The perl is not busybodied. The perl is unheaded. The perl is masted. The perl consist the elna. The perl cache the elna. The perl cache the eberhard. If something cache the perl and it consist the elna then the elna is busybodied. If the elna cache the perl and the perl consist the elna then the perl totalise the eberhard. If something totalise the eberhard and it is masted then it cache the perl. If something cache the perl and it consist the perl then the perl cache the eberhard. If something totalise the perl then the perl consist the elna. If the eberhard is early and the eberhard does not visit the perl then the perl is unheaded. The elna is not busybodied.", "logic": "\nTotalise(elna, eberhard)\nnot Totalise(elna, perl)\nConsist(elna, eberhard)\nConsist(elna, perl)\nnot Cache(elna, eberhard)\nCache(elna, perl)\nUnheaded(eberhard)\nnot Consist(eberhard, elna)\nCache(eberhard, elna)\nnot Busybodied(perl)\nUnheaded(perl)\nMasted(perl)\nConsist(perl, elna)\nCache(perl, elna)\nCache(perl, eberhard)\nforall x (Cache(x, perl) and Consist(x, elna) -> Busybodied(elna))\nCache(elna, perl) and Consist(perl, elna) -> Totalise(perl, eberhard)\nforall x (Totalise(x, eberhard) and Masted(x) -> Cache(x, perl))\nforall x (Cache(x, perl) and Consist(x, perl) -> Cache(perl, eberhard))\nforall x (Totalise(x, perl) -> Consist(perl, elna))\nEarly(eberhard) and not Cache(eberhard, perl) -> Unheaded(perl)\n\nnot Busybodied(elna)\n\nCache(elna, perl) and Consist(perl, elna) and Cache(elna, perl) and Consist(perl, elna) -> Totalise(perl, eberhard) -> therefore Totalise(perl, eberhard) Totalise(perl, eberhard) and Masted(perl) and forall x (Totalise(x, eberhard) and Masted(x) -> Cache(x, perl)) -> therefore Cache(perl, perl) Cache(perl, perl) and Consist(perl, elna) and forall x (Cache(x, perl) and Consist(x, elna) -> Busybodied(elna)) -> therefore Busybodied(elna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The latisha grease the delila. The latisha does not eat the nita. The latisha incrust the delila. The latisha incrust the nita. The latisha does not visit the delila. The latisha haze the nita. The delila is phosphoric. The delila does not see the latisha. The delila haze the latisha. The nita is not anuretic. The nita is phosphoric. The nita is emphatic. The nita incrust the latisha. The nita haze the latisha. The nita haze the delila. If something haze the nita and it incrust the latisha then the latisha is anuretic. If the latisha haze the nita and the nita incrust the latisha then the nita grease the delila. If something grease the delila and it is emphatic then it haze the nita. If something haze the nita and it incrust the nita then the nita haze the delila. If something grease the nita then the nita incrust the latisha. If the delila is algometric and the delila does not visit the nita then the nita is phosphoric. The delila does not visit the nita.", "logic": "\nGrease(latisha, delila)\nnot Grease(latisha, nita)\nIncrust(latisha, delila)\nIncrust(latisha, nita)\nnot Haze(latisha, delila)\nHaze(latisha, nita)\nPhosphoric(delila)\nnot Incrust(delila, latisha)\nHaze(delila, latisha)\nnot Anuretic(nita)\nPhosphoric(nita)\nEmphatic(nita)\nIncrust(nita, latisha)\nHaze(nita, latisha)\nHaze(nita, delila)\nforall x (Haze(x, nita) and Incrust(x, latisha) -> Anuretic(latisha))\nHaze(latisha, nita) and Incrust(nita, latisha) -> Grease(nita, delila)\nforall x (Grease(x, delila) and Emphatic(x) -> Haze(x, nita))\nforall x (Haze(x, nita) and Incrust(x, nita) -> Haze(nita, delila))\nforall x (Grease(x, nita) -> Incrust(nita, latisha))\nAlgometric(delila) and not Haze(delila, nita) -> Phosphoric(nita)\n\nnot Haze(delila, nita)\n\nforall x (Grease(x, delila) and Emphatic(x) -> Haze(x, nita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The micheil halloo the jody. The micheil does not eat the pascal. The micheil halter the jody. The micheil halter the pascal. The micheil does not visit the jody. The micheil fabricate the pascal. The jody is sunrise. The jody does not see the micheil. The jody fabricate the micheil. The pascal is not mephitic. The pascal is sunrise. The pascal is insurable. The pascal halter the micheil. The pascal fabricate the micheil. The pascal fabricate the jody. If something fabricate the pascal and it halter the micheil then the micheil is mephitic. If the micheil fabricate the pascal and the pascal halter the micheil then the pascal halloo the jody. If something halloo the jody and it is insurable then it fabricate the pascal. If something fabricate the pascal and it halter the pascal then the pascal fabricate the jody. If something halloo the pascal then the pascal halter the micheil. If the jody is many and the jody does not visit the pascal then the pascal is sunrise. The jody halter the jody.", "logic": "\nHalloo(micheil, jody)\nnot Halloo(micheil, pascal)\nHalter(micheil, jody)\nHalter(micheil, pascal)\nnot Fabricate(micheil, jody)\nFabricate(micheil, pascal)\nSunrise(jody)\nnot Halter(jody, micheil)\nFabricate(jody, micheil)\nnot Mephitic(pascal)\nSunrise(pascal)\nInsurable(pascal)\nHalter(pascal, micheil)\nFabricate(pascal, micheil)\nFabricate(pascal, jody)\nforall x (Fabricate(x, pascal) and Halter(x, micheil) -> Mephitic(micheil))\nFabricate(micheil, pascal) and Halter(pascal, micheil) -> Halloo(pascal, jody)\nforall x (Halloo(x, jody) and Insurable(x) -> Fabricate(x, pascal))\nforall x (Fabricate(x, pascal) and Halter(x, pascal) -> Fabricate(pascal, jody))\nforall x (Halloo(x, pascal) -> Halter(pascal, micheil))\nMany(jody) and not Fabricate(jody, pascal) -> Sunrise(pascal)\n\nHalter(jody, jody)\n\nHalter(jody, jody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The karissa kennel the foster. The karissa does not eat the imojean. The karissa bushwhack the foster. The karissa bushwhack the imojean. The karissa does not visit the foster. The karissa cloture the imojean. The foster is cognisable. The foster does not see the karissa. The foster cloture the karissa. The imojean is not unworkable. The imojean is cognisable. The imojean is atrial. The imojean bushwhack the karissa. The imojean cloture the karissa. The imojean cloture the foster. If something cloture the imojean and it bushwhack the karissa then the karissa is unworkable. If the karissa cloture the imojean and the imojean bushwhack the karissa then the imojean kennel the foster. If something kennel the foster and it is atrial then it cloture the imojean. If something cloture the imojean and it bushwhack the imojean then the imojean cloture the foster. If something kennel the imojean then the imojean bushwhack the karissa. If the foster is senecan and the foster does not visit the imojean then the imojean is cognisable. The karissa is not atrial.", "logic": "\nKennel(karissa, foster)\nnot Kennel(karissa, imojean)\nBushwhack(karissa, foster)\nBushwhack(karissa, imojean)\nnot Cloture(karissa, foster)\nCloture(karissa, imojean)\nCognisable(foster)\nnot Bushwhack(foster, karissa)\nCloture(foster, karissa)\nnot Unworkable(imojean)\nCognisable(imojean)\nAtrial(imojean)\nBushwhack(imojean, karissa)\nCloture(imojean, karissa)\nCloture(imojean, foster)\nforall x (Cloture(x, imojean) and Bushwhack(x, karissa) -> Unworkable(karissa))\nCloture(karissa, imojean) and Bushwhack(imojean, karissa) -> Kennel(imojean, foster)\nforall x (Kennel(x, foster) and Atrial(x) -> Cloture(x, imojean))\nforall x (Cloture(x, imojean) and Bushwhack(x, imojean) -> Cloture(imojean, foster))\nforall x (Kennel(x, imojean) -> Bushwhack(imojean, karissa))\nSenecan(foster) and not Cloture(foster, imojean) -> Cognisable(imojean)\n\nnot Atrial(karissa)\n\nnot Atrial(karissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The doti amaze the sharron. The doti does not eat the clarisse. The doti barbarize the sharron. The doti barbarize the clarisse. The doti does not visit the sharron. The doti enchant the clarisse. The sharron is biogenetic. The sharron does not see the doti. The sharron enchant the doti. The clarisse is not duodecimal. The clarisse is biogenetic. The clarisse is unruly. The clarisse barbarize the doti. The clarisse enchant the doti. The clarisse enchant the sharron. If something enchant the clarisse and it barbarize the doti then the doti is duodecimal. If the doti enchant the clarisse and the clarisse barbarize the doti then the clarisse amaze the sharron. If something amaze the sharron and it is unruly then it enchant the clarisse. If something enchant the clarisse and it barbarize the clarisse then the clarisse enchant the sharron. If something amaze the clarisse then the clarisse barbarize the doti. If the sharron is peachy and the sharron does not visit the clarisse then the clarisse is biogenetic. The doti is peachy.", "logic": "\nAmaze(doti, sharron)\nnot Amaze(doti, clarisse)\nBarbarize(doti, sharron)\nBarbarize(doti, clarisse)\nnot Enchant(doti, sharron)\nEnchant(doti, clarisse)\nBiogenetic(sharron)\nnot Barbarize(sharron, doti)\nEnchant(sharron, doti)\nnot Duodecimal(clarisse)\nBiogenetic(clarisse)\nUnruly(clarisse)\nBarbarize(clarisse, doti)\nEnchant(clarisse, doti)\nEnchant(clarisse, sharron)\nforall x (Enchant(x, clarisse) and Barbarize(x, doti) -> Duodecimal(doti))\nEnchant(doti, clarisse) and Barbarize(clarisse, doti) -> Amaze(clarisse, sharron)\nforall x (Amaze(x, sharron) and Unruly(x) -> Enchant(x, clarisse))\nforall x (Enchant(x, clarisse) and Barbarize(x, clarisse) -> Enchant(clarisse, sharron))\nforall x (Amaze(x, clarisse) -> Barbarize(clarisse, doti))\nPeachy(sharron) and not Enchant(sharron, clarisse) -> Biogenetic(clarisse)\n\nPeachy(doti)\n\nPeachy(doti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The bucky falsify the pauline. The bucky does not eat the saraann. The bucky shake the pauline. The bucky shake the saraann. The bucky does not visit the pauline. The bucky racket the saraann. The pauline is edged. The pauline does not see the bucky. The pauline racket the bucky. The saraann is not astonished. The saraann is edged. The saraann is branchiate. The saraann shake the bucky. The saraann racket the bucky. The saraann racket the pauline. If something racket the saraann and it shake the bucky then the bucky is astonished. If the bucky racket the saraann and the saraann shake the bucky then the saraann falsify the pauline. If something falsify the pauline and it is branchiate then it racket the saraann. If something racket the saraann and it shake the saraann then the saraann racket the pauline. If something falsify the saraann then the saraann shake the bucky. If the pauline is anuric and the pauline does not visit the saraann then the saraann is edged. The saraann is not nice.", "logic": "\nFalsify(bucky, pauline)\nnot Falsify(bucky, saraann)\nShake(bucky, pauline)\nShake(bucky, saraann)\nnot Racket(bucky, pauline)\nRacket(bucky, saraann)\nEdged(pauline)\nnot Shake(pauline, bucky)\nRacket(pauline, bucky)\nnot Astonished(saraann)\nEdged(saraann)\nBranchiate(saraann)\nShake(saraann, bucky)\nRacket(saraann, bucky)\nRacket(saraann, pauline)\nforall x (Racket(x, saraann) and Shake(x, bucky) -> Astonished(bucky))\nRacket(bucky, saraann) and Shake(saraann, bucky) -> Falsify(saraann, pauline)\nforall x (Falsify(x, pauline) and Branchiate(x) -> Racket(x, saraann))\nforall x (Racket(x, saraann) and Shake(x, saraann) -> Racket(saraann, pauline))\nforall x (Falsify(x, saraann) -> Shake(saraann, bucky))\nAnuric(pauline) and not Racket(pauline, saraann) -> Edged(saraann)\n\nnot Nice(saraann)\n\nnot Nice(saraann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The jerrine drivel the charisse. The jerrine does not eat the diahann. The jerrine quintuple the charisse. The jerrine quintuple the diahann. The jerrine does not visit the charisse. The jerrine remain the diahann. The charisse is roofed. The charisse does not see the jerrine. The charisse remain the jerrine. The diahann is not persian. The diahann is roofed. The diahann is paradisiac. The diahann quintuple the jerrine. The diahann remain the jerrine. The diahann remain the charisse. If something remain the diahann and it quintuple the jerrine then the jerrine is persian. If the jerrine remain the diahann and the diahann quintuple the jerrine then the diahann drivel the charisse. If something drivel the charisse and it is paradisiac then it remain the diahann. If something remain the diahann and it quintuple the diahann then the diahann remain the charisse. If something drivel the diahann then the diahann quintuple the jerrine. If the charisse is permed and the charisse does not visit the diahann then the diahann is roofed. The diahann quintuple the charisse.", "logic": "\nDrivel(jerrine, charisse)\nnot Drivel(jerrine, diahann)\nQuintuple(jerrine, charisse)\nQuintuple(jerrine, diahann)\nnot Remain(jerrine, charisse)\nRemain(jerrine, diahann)\nRoofed(charisse)\nnot Quintuple(charisse, jerrine)\nRemain(charisse, jerrine)\nnot Persian(diahann)\nRoofed(diahann)\nParadisiac(diahann)\nQuintuple(diahann, jerrine)\nRemain(diahann, jerrine)\nRemain(diahann, charisse)\nforall x (Remain(x, diahann) and Quintuple(x, jerrine) -> Persian(jerrine))\nRemain(jerrine, diahann) and Quintuple(diahann, jerrine) -> Drivel(diahann, charisse)\nforall x (Drivel(x, charisse) and Paradisiac(x) -> Remain(x, diahann))\nforall x (Remain(x, diahann) and Quintuple(x, diahann) -> Remain(diahann, charisse))\nforall x (Drivel(x, diahann) -> Quintuple(diahann, jerrine))\nPermed(charisse) and not Remain(charisse, diahann) -> Roofed(diahann)\n\nQuintuple(diahann, charisse)\n\nQuintuple(diahann, charisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The pauletta misinform the max. The pauletta does not eat the renate. The pauletta whale the max. The pauletta whale the renate. The pauletta does not visit the max. The pauletta allot the renate. The max is laughing. The max does not see the pauletta. The max allot the pauletta. The renate is not veined. The renate is laughing. The renate is homostylic. The renate whale the pauletta. The renate allot the pauletta. The renate allot the max. If something allot the renate and it whale the pauletta then the pauletta is veined. If the pauletta allot the renate and the renate whale the pauletta then the renate misinform the max. If something misinform the max and it is homostylic then it allot the renate. If something allot the renate and it whale the renate then the renate allot the max. If something misinform the renate then the renate whale the pauletta. If the max is releasing and the max does not visit the renate then the renate is laughing. The pauletta does not visit the pauletta.", "logic": "\nMisinform(pauletta, max)\nnot Misinform(pauletta, renate)\nWhale(pauletta, max)\nWhale(pauletta, renate)\nnot Allot(pauletta, max)\nAllot(pauletta, renate)\nLaughing(max)\nnot Whale(max, pauletta)\nAllot(max, pauletta)\nnot Veined(renate)\nLaughing(renate)\nHomostylic(renate)\nWhale(renate, pauletta)\nAllot(renate, pauletta)\nAllot(renate, max)\nforall x (Allot(x, renate) and Whale(x, pauletta) -> Veined(pauletta))\nAllot(pauletta, renate) and Whale(renate, pauletta) -> Misinform(renate, max)\nforall x (Misinform(x, max) and Homostylic(x) -> Allot(x, renate))\nforall x (Allot(x, renate) and Whale(x, renate) -> Allot(renate, max))\nforall x (Misinform(x, renate) -> Whale(renate, pauletta))\nReleasing(max) and not Allot(max, renate) -> Laughing(renate)\n\nnot Allot(pauletta, pauletta)\n\nnot Allot(pauletta, pauletta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The jazmin bespatter the viviana. The jazmin does not eat the perceval. The jazmin fancify the viviana. The jazmin fancify the perceval. The jazmin does not visit the viviana. The jazmin indent the perceval. The viviana is shrinkable. The viviana does not see the jazmin. The viviana indent the jazmin. The perceval is not unaged. The perceval is shrinkable. The perceval is addible. The perceval fancify the jazmin. The perceval indent the jazmin. The perceval indent the viviana. If something indent the perceval and it fancify the jazmin then the jazmin is unaged. If the jazmin indent the perceval and the perceval fancify the jazmin then the perceval bespatter the viviana. If something bespatter the viviana and it is addible then it indent the perceval. If something indent the perceval and it fancify the perceval then the perceval indent the viviana. If something bespatter the perceval then the perceval fancify the jazmin. If the viviana is prisonlike and the viviana does not visit the perceval then the perceval is shrinkable. The viviana is unaged.", "logic": "\nBespatter(jazmin, viviana)\nnot Bespatter(jazmin, perceval)\nFancify(jazmin, viviana)\nFancify(jazmin, perceval)\nnot Indent(jazmin, viviana)\nIndent(jazmin, perceval)\nShrinkable(viviana)\nnot Fancify(viviana, jazmin)\nIndent(viviana, jazmin)\nnot Unaged(perceval)\nShrinkable(perceval)\nAddible(perceval)\nFancify(perceval, jazmin)\nIndent(perceval, jazmin)\nIndent(perceval, viviana)\nforall x (Indent(x, perceval) and Fancify(x, jazmin) -> Unaged(jazmin))\nIndent(jazmin, perceval) and Fancify(perceval, jazmin) -> Bespatter(perceval, viviana)\nforall x (Bespatter(x, viviana) and Addible(x) -> Indent(x, perceval))\nforall x (Indent(x, perceval) and Fancify(x, perceval) -> Indent(perceval, viviana))\nforall x (Bespatter(x, perceval) -> Fancify(perceval, jazmin))\nPrisonlike(viviana) and not Indent(viviana, perceval) -> Shrinkable(perceval)\n\nUnaged(viviana)\n\nUnaged(viviana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Allie is not quality. Allie is nonstick. Yoshiko is quality. Yoshiko is saliferous. Yoshiko is indicatory. Yoshiko is aleuronic. Roddy is hieratical. Roddy is indicatory. Lilllie is not hieratical. Lilllie is saliferous. If something is saliferous and not quality then it is nonstick. If something is saliferous and not quality then it is hieratical. If something is nonstick and not quality then it is saliferous. If something is saliferous and not hieratical then it is indicatory. If something is quality and not hieratical then it is indicatory. All saliferous, hieratical things are aleuronic. If something is indicatory and not quality then it is aleuronic. If something is hieratical then it is aleuronic. Lilllie is saliferous.", "logic": "\nnot Quality(allie)\nNonstick(allie)\nQuality(yoshiko)\nSaliferous(yoshiko)\nIndicatory(yoshiko)\nAleuronic(yoshiko)\nHieratical(roddy)\nIndicatory(roddy)\nnot Hieratical(lilllie)\nSaliferous(lilllie)\nforall x (Saliferous(x) and not Quality(x) -> Nonstick(x))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) and not Quality(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Nonstick(x) and not Quality(x) -> Saliferous(x))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) and not Hieratical(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Quality(x) and not Hieratical(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) and Hieratical(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nforall x (Indicatory(x) and not Quality(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nforall x (Hieratical(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\n\nSaliferous(lilllie)\n\ntherefore Saliferous(lilllie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Pinchas is not resinous. Pinchas is uneatable. Veronika is resinous. Veronika is coltish. Veronika is canted. Veronika is lubricious. Merilyn is rarefied. Merilyn is canted. Dorcas is not rarefied. Dorcas is coltish. If something is coltish and not resinous then it is uneatable. If something is coltish and not resinous then it is rarefied. If something is uneatable and not resinous then it is coltish. If something is coltish and not rarefied then it is canted. If something is resinous and not rarefied then it is canted. All coltish, rarefied things are lubricious. If something is canted and not resinous then it is lubricious. If something is rarefied then it is lubricious. Veronika is not resinous.", "logic": "\nnot Resinous(pinchas)\nUneatable(pinchas)\nResinous(veronika)\nColtish(veronika)\nCanted(veronika)\nLubricious(veronika)\nRarefied(merilyn)\nCanted(merilyn)\nnot Rarefied(dorcas)\nColtish(dorcas)\nforall x (Coltish(x) and not Resinous(x) -> Uneatable(x))\nforall x (Coltish(x) and not Resinous(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Uneatable(x) and not Resinous(x) -> Coltish(x))\nforall x (Coltish(x) and not Rarefied(x) -> Canted(x))\nforall x (Resinous(x) and not Rarefied(x) -> Canted(x))\nforall x (Coltish(x) and Rarefied(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Canted(x) and not Resinous(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> Lubricious(x))\n\nnot Resinous(veronika)\n\ntherefore Resinous(veronika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Barnaby is not relieved. Barnaby is erosive. Blanca is relieved. Blanca is viricidal. Blanca is wheezy. Blanca is falsetto. Adria is consummate. Adria is wheezy. Vasili is not consummate. Vasili is viricidal. If something is viricidal and not relieved then it is erosive. If something is viricidal and not relieved then it is consummate. If something is erosive and not relieved then it is viricidal. If something is viricidal and not consummate then it is wheezy. If something is relieved and not consummate then it is wheezy. All viricidal, consummate things are falsetto. If something is wheezy and not relieved then it is falsetto. If something is consummate then it is falsetto. Adria is falsetto.", "logic": "\nnot Relieved(barnaby)\nErosive(barnaby)\nRelieved(blanca)\nViricidal(blanca)\nWheezy(blanca)\nFalsetto(blanca)\nConsummate(adria)\nWheezy(adria)\nnot Consummate(vasili)\nViricidal(vasili)\nforall x (Viricidal(x) and not Relieved(x) -> Erosive(x))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) and not Relieved(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Erosive(x) and not Relieved(x) -> Viricidal(x))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) and not Consummate(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Relieved(x) and not Consummate(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) and Consummate(x) -> Falsetto(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) and not Relieved(x) -> Falsetto(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) -> Falsetto(x))\n\nFalsetto(adria)\n\nConsummate(adria) and forall x (Consummate(x) -> Falsetto(x)) -> therefore Falsetto(adria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Vaughn is not cowled. Vaughn is steepish. Raj is cowled. Raj is evergreen. Raj is pantheist. Raj is exilic. Broddy is ataxic. Broddy is pantheist. Zippy is not ataxic. Zippy is evergreen. If something is evergreen and not cowled then it is steepish. If something is evergreen and not cowled then it is ataxic. If something is steepish and not cowled then it is evergreen. If something is evergreen and not ataxic then it is pantheist. If something is cowled and not ataxic then it is pantheist. All evergreen, ataxic things are exilic. If something is pantheist and not cowled then it is exilic. If something is ataxic then it is exilic. Vaughn is not evergreen.", "logic": "\nnot Cowled(vaughn)\nSteepish(vaughn)\nCowled(raj)\nEvergreen(raj)\nPantheist(raj)\nExilic(raj)\nAtaxic(broddy)\nPantheist(broddy)\nnot Ataxic(zippy)\nEvergreen(zippy)\nforall x (Evergreen(x) and not Cowled(x) -> Steepish(x))\nforall x (Evergreen(x) and not Cowled(x) -> Ataxic(x))\nforall x (Steepish(x) and not Cowled(x) -> Evergreen(x))\nforall x (Evergreen(x) and not Ataxic(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Cowled(x) and not Ataxic(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Evergreen(x) and Ataxic(x) -> Exilic(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) and not Cowled(x) -> Exilic(x))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) -> Exilic(x))\n\nnot Evergreen(vaughn)\n\nSteepish(vaughn) and not Cowled(vaughn) and forall x (Steepish(x) and not Cowled(x) -> Evergreen(x)) -> therefore Evergreen(vaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Binni is not millenary. Binni is salubrious. Rosamund is millenary. Rosamund is ahead. Rosamund is coalescent. Rosamund is podlike. Sylvan is transitory. Sylvan is coalescent. Corly is not transitory. Corly is ahead. If something is ahead and not millenary then it is salubrious. If something is ahead and not millenary then it is transitory. If something is salubrious and not millenary then it is ahead. If something is ahead and not transitory then it is coalescent. If something is millenary and not transitory then it is coalescent. All ahead, transitory things are podlike. If something is coalescent and not millenary then it is podlike. If something is transitory then it is podlike. Binni is transitory.", "logic": "\nnot Millenary(binni)\nSalubrious(binni)\nMillenary(rosamund)\nAhead(rosamund)\nCoalescent(rosamund)\nPodlike(rosamund)\nTransitory(sylvan)\nCoalescent(sylvan)\nnot Transitory(corly)\nAhead(corly)\nforall x (Ahead(x) and not Millenary(x) -> Salubrious(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) and not Millenary(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Salubrious(x) and not Millenary(x) -> Ahead(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) and not Transitory(x) -> Coalescent(x))\nforall x (Millenary(x) and not Transitory(x) -> Coalescent(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) and Transitory(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and not Millenary(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Podlike(x))\n\nTransitory(binni)\n\nSalubrious(binni) and not Millenary(binni) and forall x (Salubrious(x) and not Millenary(x) -> Ahead(x)) -> therefore Ahead(binni) Ahead(binni) and not Millenary(binni) and forall x (Ahead(x) and not Millenary(x) -> Transitory(x)) -> therefore Transitory(binni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Glen is not phosphoric. Glen is rearmost. Lian is phosphoric. Lian is mobbish. Lian is thermal. Lian is jubilant. Mohammed is garrulous. Mohammed is thermal. Winifield is not garrulous. Winifield is mobbish. If something is mobbish and not phosphoric then it is rearmost. If something is mobbish and not phosphoric then it is garrulous. If something is rearmost and not phosphoric then it is mobbish. If something is mobbish and not garrulous then it is thermal. If something is phosphoric and not garrulous then it is thermal. All mobbish, garrulous things are jubilant. If something is thermal and not phosphoric then it is jubilant. If something is garrulous then it is jubilant. Glen is not garrulous.", "logic": "\nnot Phosphoric(glen)\nRearmost(glen)\nPhosphoric(lian)\nMobbish(lian)\nThermal(lian)\nJubilant(lian)\nGarrulous(mohammed)\nThermal(mohammed)\nnot Garrulous(winifield)\nMobbish(winifield)\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and not Phosphoric(x) -> Rearmost(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and not Phosphoric(x) -> Garrulous(x))\nforall x (Rearmost(x) and not Phosphoric(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and not Garrulous(x) -> Thermal(x))\nforall x (Phosphoric(x) and not Garrulous(x) -> Thermal(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and Garrulous(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Thermal(x) and not Phosphoric(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Garrulous(x) -> Jubilant(x))\n\nnot Garrulous(glen)\n\nRearmost(glen) and not Phosphoric(glen) and forall x (Rearmost(x) and not Phosphoric(x) -> Mobbish(x)) -> therefore Mobbish(glen) Mobbish(glen) and not Phosphoric(glen) and forall x (Mobbish(x) and not Phosphoric(x) -> Garrulous(x)) -> therefore Garrulous(glen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Breena is not pinioned. Breena is voiced. Lenore is pinioned. Lenore is jumbled. Lenore is flightless. Lenore is dappled. Lorenzo is mansard. Lorenzo is flightless. Lev is not mansard. Lev is jumbled. If something is jumbled and not pinioned then it is voiced. If something is jumbled and not pinioned then it is mansard. If something is voiced and not pinioned then it is jumbled. If something is jumbled and not mansard then it is flightless. If something is pinioned and not mansard then it is flightless. All jumbled, mansard things are dappled. If something is flightless and not pinioned then it is dappled. If something is mansard then it is dappled. Breena is dappled.", "logic": "\nnot Pinioned(breena)\nVoiced(breena)\nPinioned(lenore)\nJumbled(lenore)\nFlightless(lenore)\nDappled(lenore)\nMansard(lorenzo)\nFlightless(lorenzo)\nnot Mansard(lev)\nJumbled(lev)\nforall x (Jumbled(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Voiced(x))\nforall x (Jumbled(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Mansard(x))\nforall x (Voiced(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Jumbled(x))\nforall x (Jumbled(x) and not Mansard(x) -> Flightless(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) and not Mansard(x) -> Flightless(x))\nforall x (Jumbled(x) and Mansard(x) -> Dappled(x))\nforall x (Flightless(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Dappled(x))\nforall x (Mansard(x) -> Dappled(x))\n\nDappled(breena)\n\nVoiced(breena) and not Pinioned(breena) and forall x (Voiced(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Jumbled(x)) -> therefore Jumbled(breena) Jumbled(breena) and not Pinioned(breena) and forall x (Jumbled(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> Mansard(x)) -> therefore Mansard(breena) Mansard(breena) and forall x (Mansard(x) -> Dappled(x)) -> therefore Dappled(breena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Raina is not overgreedy. Raina is unexplored. Amelina is overgreedy. Amelina is smarmy. Amelina is favorite. Amelina is meritless. Griffith is steamy. Griffith is favorite. Karen is not steamy. Karen is smarmy. If something is smarmy and not overgreedy then it is unexplored. If something is smarmy and not overgreedy then it is steamy. If something is unexplored and not overgreedy then it is smarmy. If something is smarmy and not steamy then it is favorite. If something is overgreedy and not steamy then it is favorite. All smarmy, steamy things are meritless. If something is favorite and not overgreedy then it is meritless. If something is steamy then it is meritless. Raina is not meritless.", "logic": "\nnot Overgreedy(raina)\nUnexplored(raina)\nOvergreedy(amelina)\nSmarmy(amelina)\nFavorite(amelina)\nMeritless(amelina)\nSteamy(griffith)\nFavorite(griffith)\nnot Steamy(karen)\nSmarmy(karen)\nforall x (Smarmy(x) and not Overgreedy(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) and not Overgreedy(x) -> Steamy(x))\nforall x (Unexplored(x) and not Overgreedy(x) -> Smarmy(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) and not Steamy(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) and not Steamy(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) and Steamy(x) -> Meritless(x))\nforall x (Favorite(x) and not Overgreedy(x) -> Meritless(x))\nforall x (Steamy(x) -> Meritless(x))\n\nnot Meritless(raina)\n\nUnexplored(raina) and not Overgreedy(raina) and forall x (Unexplored(x) and not Overgreedy(x) -> Smarmy(x)) -> therefore Smarmy(raina) Smarmy(raina) and not Overgreedy(raina) and forall x (Smarmy(x) and not Overgreedy(x) -> Steamy(x)) -> therefore Steamy(raina) Steamy(raina) and forall x (Steamy(x) -> Meritless(x)) -> therefore Meritless(raina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Konstanze is not erroneous. Konstanze is game. Zane is erroneous. Zane is ascending. Zane is downbound. Zane is raising. Lida is weblike. Lida is downbound. Hamlen is not weblike. Hamlen is ascending. If something is ascending and not erroneous then it is game. If something is ascending and not erroneous then it is weblike. If something is game and not erroneous then it is ascending. If something is ascending and not weblike then it is downbound. If something is erroneous and not weblike then it is downbound. All ascending, weblike things are raising. If something is downbound and not erroneous then it is raising. If something is weblike then it is raising. Lida is not ascending.", "logic": "\nnot Erroneous(konstanze)\nGame(konstanze)\nErroneous(zane)\nAscending(zane)\nDownbound(zane)\nRaising(zane)\nWeblike(lida)\nDownbound(lida)\nnot Weblike(hamlen)\nAscending(hamlen)\nforall x (Ascending(x) and not Erroneous(x) -> Game(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) and not Erroneous(x) -> Weblike(x))\nforall x (Game(x) and not Erroneous(x) -> Ascending(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) and not Weblike(x) -> Downbound(x))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) and not Weblike(x) -> Downbound(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) and Weblike(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Downbound(x) and not Erroneous(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Weblike(x) -> Raising(x))\n\nnot Ascending(lida)\n\nforall x (Game(x) and not Erroneous(x) -> Ascending(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Esmerelda is not minacious. Esmerelda is dead. Elwin is minacious. Elwin is absent. Elwin is classical. Elwin is shady. Louis is twinned. Louis is classical. Prudence is not twinned. Prudence is absent. If something is absent and not minacious then it is dead. If something is absent and not minacious then it is twinned. If something is dead and not minacious then it is absent. If something is absent and not twinned then it is classical. If something is minacious and not twinned then it is classical. All absent, twinned things are shady. If something is classical and not minacious then it is shady. If something is twinned then it is shady. Elwin is twinned.", "logic": "\nnot Minacious(esmerelda)\nDead(esmerelda)\nMinacious(elwin)\nAbsent(elwin)\nClassical(elwin)\nShady(elwin)\nTwinned(louis)\nClassical(louis)\nnot Twinned(prudence)\nAbsent(prudence)\nforall x (Absent(x) and not Minacious(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) and not Minacious(x) -> Twinned(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) and not Minacious(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) and not Twinned(x) -> Classical(x))\nforall x (Minacious(x) and not Twinned(x) -> Classical(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) and Twinned(x) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Classical(x) and not Minacious(x) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Twinned(x) -> Shady(x))\n\nTwinned(elwin)\n\nforall x (Absent(x) and not Minacious(x) -> Twinned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Estel is not unfettered. Estel is african. Mair is unfettered. Mair is coalescent. Mair is caruncular. Mair is enate. Carter is malposed. Carter is caruncular. Mitch is not malposed. Mitch is coalescent. If something is coalescent and not unfettered then it is african. If something is coalescent and not unfettered then it is malposed. If something is african and not unfettered then it is coalescent. If something is coalescent and not malposed then it is caruncular. If something is unfettered and not malposed then it is caruncular. All coalescent, malposed things are enate. If something is caruncular and not unfettered then it is enate. If something is malposed then it is enate. Mitch is not enate.", "logic": "\nnot Unfettered(estel)\nAfrican(estel)\nUnfettered(mair)\nCoalescent(mair)\nCaruncular(mair)\nEnate(mair)\nMalposed(carter)\nCaruncular(carter)\nnot Malposed(mitch)\nCoalescent(mitch)\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and not Unfettered(x) -> African(x))\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and not Unfettered(x) -> Malposed(x))\nforall x (African(x) and not Unfettered(x) -> Coalescent(x))\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and not Malposed(x) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Unfettered(x) and not Malposed(x) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and Malposed(x) -> Enate(x))\nforall x (Caruncular(x) and not Unfettered(x) -> Enate(x))\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> Enate(x))\n\nnot Enate(mitch)\n\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and Malposed(x) -> Enate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Alexei is not kyphotic. Alexei is skinny. Jessy is kyphotic. Jessy is resinlike. Jessy is memorable. Jessy is papillose. Guido is hazel. Guido is memorable. Rosetta is not hazel. Rosetta is resinlike. If something is resinlike and not kyphotic then it is skinny. If something is resinlike and not kyphotic then it is hazel. If something is skinny and not kyphotic then it is resinlike. If something is resinlike and not hazel then it is memorable. If something is kyphotic and not hazel then it is memorable. All resinlike, hazel things are papillose. If something is memorable and not kyphotic then it is papillose. If something is hazel then it is papillose. Rosetta is skinny.", "logic": "\nnot Kyphotic(alexei)\nSkinny(alexei)\nKyphotic(jessy)\nResinlike(jessy)\nMemorable(jessy)\nPapillose(jessy)\nHazel(guido)\nMemorable(guido)\nnot Hazel(rosetta)\nResinlike(rosetta)\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and not Kyphotic(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and not Kyphotic(x) -> Hazel(x))\nforall x (Skinny(x) and not Kyphotic(x) -> Resinlike(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and not Hazel(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) and not Hazel(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and Hazel(x) -> Papillose(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) and not Kyphotic(x) -> Papillose(x))\nforall x (Hazel(x) -> Papillose(x))\n\nSkinny(rosetta)\n\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and not Kyphotic(x) -> Skinny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Lind is not undyed. Lind is ranking. Avrit is undyed. Avrit is pelvic. Avrit is setose. Avrit is reciprocal. Cortese is odorless. Cortese is setose. Thacher is not odorless. Thacher is pelvic. If something is pelvic and not undyed then it is ranking. If something is pelvic and not undyed then it is odorless. If something is ranking and not undyed then it is pelvic. If something is pelvic and not odorless then it is setose. If something is undyed and not odorless then it is setose. All pelvic, odorless things are reciprocal. If something is setose and not undyed then it is reciprocal. If something is odorless then it is reciprocal. Cortese is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Undyed(lind)\nRanking(lind)\nUndyed(avrit)\nPelvic(avrit)\nSetose(avrit)\nReciprocal(avrit)\nOdorless(cortese)\nSetose(cortese)\nnot Odorless(thacher)\nPelvic(thacher)\nforall x (Pelvic(x) and not Undyed(x) -> Ranking(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) and not Undyed(x) -> Odorless(x))\nforall x (Ranking(x) and not Undyed(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) and not Odorless(x) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Undyed(x) and not Odorless(x) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) and Odorless(x) -> Reciprocal(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) and not Undyed(x) -> Reciprocal(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> Reciprocal(x))\n\nnot Round(cortese)\n\nnot Round(cortese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Anatol is not frayed. Anatol is variform. Doyle is frayed. Doyle is ascendable. Doyle is seismal. Doyle is feral. Cornelia is olfactory. Cornelia is seismal. Tella is not olfactory. Tella is ascendable. If something is ascendable and not frayed then it is variform. If something is ascendable and not frayed then it is olfactory. If something is variform and not frayed then it is ascendable. If something is ascendable and not olfactory then it is seismal. If something is frayed and not olfactory then it is seismal. All ascendable, olfactory things are feral. If something is seismal and not frayed then it is feral. If something is olfactory then it is feral. Tella is frayed.", "logic": "\nnot Frayed(anatol)\nVariform(anatol)\nFrayed(doyle)\nAscendable(doyle)\nSeismal(doyle)\nFeral(doyle)\nOlfactory(cornelia)\nSeismal(cornelia)\nnot Olfactory(tella)\nAscendable(tella)\nforall x (Ascendable(x) and not Frayed(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Ascendable(x) and not Frayed(x) -> Olfactory(x))\nforall x (Variform(x) and not Frayed(x) -> Ascendable(x))\nforall x (Ascendable(x) and not Olfactory(x) -> Seismal(x))\nforall x (Frayed(x) and not Olfactory(x) -> Seismal(x))\nforall x (Ascendable(x) and Olfactory(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Seismal(x) and not Frayed(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Olfactory(x) -> Feral(x))\n\nFrayed(tella)\n\nFrayed(tella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Jacinta is not unhampered. Jacinta is hypethral. Norene is unhampered. Norene is stubbled. Norene is muddled. Norene is sumptuary. Stirling is hurrying. Stirling is muddled. Wylma is not hurrying. Wylma is stubbled. If something is stubbled and not unhampered then it is hypethral. If something is stubbled and not unhampered then it is hurrying. If something is hypethral and not unhampered then it is stubbled. If something is stubbled and not hurrying then it is muddled. If something is unhampered and not hurrying then it is muddled. All stubbled, hurrying things are sumptuary. If something is muddled and not unhampered then it is sumptuary. If something is hurrying then it is sumptuary. Norene is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Unhampered(jacinta)\nHypethral(jacinta)\nUnhampered(norene)\nStubbled(norene)\nMuddled(norene)\nSumptuary(norene)\nHurrying(stirling)\nMuddled(stirling)\nnot Hurrying(wylma)\nStubbled(wylma)\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and not Unhampered(x) -> Hypethral(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and not Unhampered(x) -> Hurrying(x))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) and not Unhampered(x) -> Stubbled(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and not Hurrying(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Unhampered(x) and not Hurrying(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and Hurrying(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) and not Unhampered(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\n\nnot Round(norene)\n\nnot Round(norene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Wileen is not atrip. Wileen is thermal. Natalie is atrip. Natalie is mortal. Natalie is tutelar. Natalie is shodden. Giana is social. Giana is tutelar. Remington is not social. Remington is mortal. If something is mortal and not atrip then it is thermal. If something is mortal and not atrip then it is social. If something is thermal and not atrip then it is mortal. If something is mortal and not social then it is tutelar. If something is atrip and not social then it is tutelar. All mortal, social things are shodden. If something is tutelar and not atrip then it is shodden. If something is social then it is shodden. Remington is round.", "logic": "\nnot Atrip(wileen)\nThermal(wileen)\nAtrip(natalie)\nMortal(natalie)\nTutelar(natalie)\nShodden(natalie)\nSocial(giana)\nTutelar(giana)\nnot Social(remington)\nMortal(remington)\nforall x (Mortal(x) and not Atrip(x) -> Thermal(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) and not Atrip(x) -> Social(x))\nforall x (Thermal(x) and not Atrip(x) -> Mortal(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) and not Social(x) -> Tutelar(x))\nforall x (Atrip(x) and not Social(x) -> Tutelar(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) and Social(x) -> Shodden(x))\nforall x (Tutelar(x) and not Atrip(x) -> Shodden(x))\nforall x (Social(x) -> Shodden(x))\n\nRound(remington)\n\nRound(remington) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "The dean lollop the lauraine. The dean penalise the francene. The dean does not eat the janaye. The dean is chinchy. The dean does not see the francene. The lauraine lollop the dean. The lauraine lollop the janaye. The lauraine penalise the janaye. The lauraine is iodized. The lauraine is chinchy. The lauraine prang the janaye. The francene penalise the lauraine. The francene penalise the janaye. The francene is slanting. The francene prang the janaye. The janaye is unflurried. If something is unflurried then it does not chase the francene. If something lollop the francene then it penalise the lauraine. If something lollop the dean and the dean does not see the francene then the dean lollop the francene. If something penalise the lauraine then it lollop the dean. If the francene lollop the lauraine and the janaye does not eat the francene then the francene prang the lauraine. If something prang the lauraine then it penalise the janaye. If something is slanting then it does not eat the dean. If something lollop the francene then the francene lollop the lauraine. The lauraine penalise the janaye.", "logic": "\nLollop(dean, lauraine)\nPenalise(dean, francene)\nnot Penalise(dean, janaye)\nChinchy(dean)\nnot Prang(dean, francene)\nLollop(lauraine, dean)\nLollop(lauraine, janaye)\nPenalise(lauraine, janaye)\nIodized(lauraine)\nChinchy(lauraine)\nPrang(lauraine, janaye)\nPenalise(francene, lauraine)\nPenalise(francene, janaye)\nSlanting(francene)\nPrang(francene, janaye)\nUnflurried(janaye)\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> not Lollop(x, francene))\nforall x (Lollop(x, francene) -> Penalise(x, lauraine))\nforall x (Lollop(x, dean) and not Prang(dean, francene) -> Lollop(dean, francene))\nforall x (Penalise(x, lauraine) -> Lollop(x, dean))\nLollop(francene, lauraine) and not Penalise(janaye, francene) -> Prang(francene, lauraine)\nforall x (Prang(x, lauraine) -> Penalise(x, janaye))\nforall x (Slanting(x) -> not Penalise(x, dean))\nforall x (Lollop(x, francene) -> Lollop(francene, lauraine))\n\nPenalise(lauraine, janaye)\n\ntherefore Penalise(lauraine, janaye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The dionysus ricochet the sibilla. The dionysus desalt the junina. The dionysus does not eat the lowell. The dionysus is boisterous. The dionysus does not see the junina. The sibilla ricochet the dionysus. The sibilla ricochet the lowell. The sibilla desalt the lowell. The sibilla is assentient. The sibilla is boisterous. The sibilla pole the lowell. The junina desalt the sibilla. The junina desalt the lowell. The junina is mediatory. The junina pole the lowell. The lowell is validatory. If something is validatory then it does not chase the junina. If something ricochet the junina then it desalt the sibilla. If something ricochet the dionysus and the dionysus does not see the junina then the dionysus ricochet the junina. If something desalt the sibilla then it ricochet the dionysus. If the junina ricochet the sibilla and the lowell does not eat the junina then the junina pole the sibilla. If something pole the sibilla then it desalt the lowell. If something is mediatory then it does not eat the dionysus. If something ricochet the junina then the junina ricochet the sibilla. The dionysus is not boisterous.", "logic": "\nRicochet(dionysus, sibilla)\nDesalt(dionysus, junina)\nnot Desalt(dionysus, lowell)\nBoisterous(dionysus)\nnot Pole(dionysus, junina)\nRicochet(sibilla, dionysus)\nRicochet(sibilla, lowell)\nDesalt(sibilla, lowell)\nAssentient(sibilla)\nBoisterous(sibilla)\nPole(sibilla, lowell)\nDesalt(junina, sibilla)\nDesalt(junina, lowell)\nMediatory(junina)\nPole(junina, lowell)\nValidatory(lowell)\nforall x (Validatory(x) -> not Ricochet(x, junina))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, junina) -> Desalt(x, sibilla))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, dionysus) and not Pole(dionysus, junina) -> Ricochet(dionysus, junina))\nforall x (Desalt(x, sibilla) -> Ricochet(x, dionysus))\nRicochet(junina, sibilla) and not Desalt(lowell, junina) -> Pole(junina, sibilla)\nforall x (Pole(x, sibilla) -> Desalt(x, lowell))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> not Desalt(x, dionysus))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, junina) -> Ricochet(junina, sibilla))\n\nnot Boisterous(dionysus)\n\ntherefore Boisterous(dionysus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The wendel reseal the heywood. The wendel depolarise the donella. The wendel does not eat the oriana. The wendel is underfed. The wendel does not see the donella. The heywood reseal the wendel. The heywood reseal the oriana. The heywood depolarise the oriana. The heywood is compliant. The heywood is underfed. The heywood recruit the oriana. The donella depolarise the heywood. The donella depolarise the oriana. The donella is barbate. The donella recruit the oriana. The oriana is diffusive. If something is diffusive then it does not chase the donella. If something reseal the donella then it depolarise the heywood. If something reseal the wendel and the wendel does not see the donella then the wendel reseal the donella. If something depolarise the heywood then it reseal the wendel. If the donella reseal the heywood and the oriana does not eat the donella then the donella recruit the heywood. If something recruit the heywood then it depolarise the oriana. If something is barbate then it does not eat the wendel. If something reseal the donella then the donella reseal the heywood. The donella does not eat the wendel.", "logic": "\nReseal(wendel, heywood)\nDepolarise(wendel, donella)\nnot Depolarise(wendel, oriana)\nUnderfed(wendel)\nnot Recruit(wendel, donella)\nReseal(heywood, wendel)\nReseal(heywood, oriana)\nDepolarise(heywood, oriana)\nCompliant(heywood)\nUnderfed(heywood)\nRecruit(heywood, oriana)\nDepolarise(donella, heywood)\nDepolarise(donella, oriana)\nBarbate(donella)\nRecruit(donella, oriana)\nDiffusive(oriana)\nforall x (Diffusive(x) -> not Reseal(x, donella))\nforall x (Reseal(x, donella) -> Depolarise(x, heywood))\nforall x (Reseal(x, wendel) and not Recruit(wendel, donella) -> Reseal(wendel, donella))\nforall x (Depolarise(x, heywood) -> Reseal(x, wendel))\nReseal(donella, heywood) and not Depolarise(oriana, donella) -> Recruit(donella, heywood)\nforall x (Recruit(x, heywood) -> Depolarise(x, oriana))\nforall x (Barbate(x) -> not Depolarise(x, wendel))\nforall x (Reseal(x, donella) -> Reseal(donella, heywood))\n\nnot Depolarise(donella, wendel)\n\nBarbate(donella) and forall x (Barbate(x) -> not Depolarise(x, wendel)) -> therefore not Depolarise(donella, wendel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The kristian canton the rosaline. The kristian preview the eva. The kristian does not eat the wheeler. The kristian is billed. The kristian does not see the eva. The rosaline canton the kristian. The rosaline canton the wheeler. The rosaline preview the wheeler. The rosaline is lidless. The rosaline is billed. The rosaline empurple the wheeler. The eva preview the rosaline. The eva preview the wheeler. The eva is akin. The eva empurple the wheeler. The wheeler is oversexed. If something is oversexed then it does not chase the eva. If something canton the eva then it preview the rosaline. If something canton the kristian and the kristian does not see the eva then the kristian canton the eva. If something preview the rosaline then it canton the kristian. If the eva canton the rosaline and the wheeler does not eat the eva then the eva empurple the rosaline. If something empurple the rosaline then it preview the wheeler. If something is akin then it does not eat the kristian. If something canton the eva then the eva canton the rosaline. The eva does not chase the kristian.", "logic": "\nCanton(kristian, rosaline)\nPreview(kristian, eva)\nnot Preview(kristian, wheeler)\nBilled(kristian)\nnot Empurple(kristian, eva)\nCanton(rosaline, kristian)\nCanton(rosaline, wheeler)\nPreview(rosaline, wheeler)\nLidless(rosaline)\nBilled(rosaline)\nEmpurple(rosaline, wheeler)\nPreview(eva, rosaline)\nPreview(eva, wheeler)\nAkin(eva)\nEmpurple(eva, wheeler)\nOversexed(wheeler)\nforall x (Oversexed(x) -> not Canton(x, eva))\nforall x (Canton(x, eva) -> Preview(x, rosaline))\nforall x (Canton(x, kristian) and not Empurple(kristian, eva) -> Canton(kristian, eva))\nforall x (Preview(x, rosaline) -> Canton(x, kristian))\nCanton(eva, rosaline) and not Preview(wheeler, eva) -> Empurple(eva, rosaline)\nforall x (Empurple(x, rosaline) -> Preview(x, wheeler))\nforall x (Akin(x) -> not Preview(x, kristian))\nforall x (Canton(x, eva) -> Canton(eva, rosaline))\n\nnot Canton(eva, kristian)\n\nPreview(eva, rosaline) and forall x (Preview(x, rosaline) -> Canton(x, kristian)) -> therefore Canton(eva, kristian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The annice lave the gavrielle. The annice currycomb the debbra. The annice does not eat the darren. The annice is fruitful. The annice does not see the debbra. The gavrielle lave the annice. The gavrielle lave the darren. The gavrielle currycomb the darren. The gavrielle is zealous. The gavrielle is fruitful. The gavrielle insult the darren. The debbra currycomb the gavrielle. The debbra currycomb the darren. The debbra is utopian. The debbra insult the darren. The darren is unformed. If something is unformed then it does not chase the debbra. If something lave the debbra then it currycomb the gavrielle. If something lave the annice and the annice does not see the debbra then the annice lave the debbra. If something currycomb the gavrielle then it lave the annice. If the debbra lave the gavrielle and the darren does not eat the debbra then the debbra insult the gavrielle. If something insult the gavrielle then it currycomb the darren. If something is utopian then it does not eat the annice. If something lave the debbra then the debbra lave the gavrielle. The annice currycomb the gavrielle.", "logic": "\nLave(annice, gavrielle)\nCurrycomb(annice, debbra)\nnot Currycomb(annice, darren)\nFruitful(annice)\nnot Insult(annice, debbra)\nLave(gavrielle, annice)\nLave(gavrielle, darren)\nCurrycomb(gavrielle, darren)\nZealous(gavrielle)\nFruitful(gavrielle)\nInsult(gavrielle, darren)\nCurrycomb(debbra, gavrielle)\nCurrycomb(debbra, darren)\nUtopian(debbra)\nInsult(debbra, darren)\nUnformed(darren)\nforall x (Unformed(x) -> not Lave(x, debbra))\nforall x (Lave(x, debbra) -> Currycomb(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Lave(x, annice) and not Insult(annice, debbra) -> Lave(annice, debbra))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, gavrielle) -> Lave(x, annice))\nLave(debbra, gavrielle) and not Currycomb(darren, debbra) -> Insult(debbra, gavrielle)\nforall x (Insult(x, gavrielle) -> Currycomb(x, darren))\nforall x (Utopian(x) -> not Currycomb(x, annice))\nforall x (Lave(x, debbra) -> Lave(debbra, gavrielle))\n\nCurrycomb(annice, gavrielle)\n\nLave(gavrielle, annice) and not Insult(annice, debbra) and forall x (Lave(x, annice) and not Insult(annice, debbra) -> Lave(annice, debbra)) -> therefore Lave(annice, debbra) Lave(annice, debbra) and forall x (Lave(x, debbra) -> Currycomb(x, gavrielle)) -> therefore Currycomb(annice, gavrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The ramon spatchcock the kelley. The ramon beaver the analise. The ramon does not eat the milt. The ramon is wintry. The ramon does not see the analise. The kelley spatchcock the ramon. The kelley spatchcock the milt. The kelley beaver the milt. The kelley is asinine. The kelley is wintry. The kelley toast the milt. The analise beaver the kelley. The analise beaver the milt. The analise is stagey. The analise toast the milt. The milt is epithelial. If something is epithelial then it does not chase the analise. If something spatchcock the analise then it beaver the kelley. If something spatchcock the ramon and the ramon does not see the analise then the ramon spatchcock the analise. If something beaver the kelley then it spatchcock the ramon. If the analise spatchcock the kelley and the milt does not eat the analise then the analise toast the kelley. If something toast the kelley then it beaver the milt. If something is stagey then it does not eat the ramon. If something spatchcock the analise then the analise spatchcock the kelley. The analise does not chase the kelley.", "logic": "\nSpatchcock(ramon, kelley)\nBeaver(ramon, analise)\nnot Beaver(ramon, milt)\nWintry(ramon)\nnot Toast(ramon, analise)\nSpatchcock(kelley, ramon)\nSpatchcock(kelley, milt)\nBeaver(kelley, milt)\nAsinine(kelley)\nWintry(kelley)\nToast(kelley, milt)\nBeaver(analise, kelley)\nBeaver(analise, milt)\nStagey(analise)\nToast(analise, milt)\nEpithelial(milt)\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> not Spatchcock(x, analise))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, analise) -> Beaver(x, kelley))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, ramon) and not Toast(ramon, analise) -> Spatchcock(ramon, analise))\nforall x (Beaver(x, kelley) -> Spatchcock(x, ramon))\nSpatchcock(analise, kelley) and not Beaver(milt, analise) -> Toast(analise, kelley)\nforall x (Toast(x, kelley) -> Beaver(x, milt))\nforall x (Stagey(x) -> not Beaver(x, ramon))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, analise) -> Spatchcock(analise, kelley))\n\nnot Spatchcock(analise, kelley)\n\nSpatchcock(kelley, ramon) and not Toast(ramon, analise) and forall x (Spatchcock(x, ramon) and not Toast(ramon, analise) -> Spatchcock(ramon, analise)) -> therefore Spatchcock(ramon, analise) Spatchcock(ramon, analise) and forall x (Spatchcock(x, analise) -> Spatchcock(analise, kelley)) -> therefore Spatchcock(analise, kelley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The darrell bemock the allie. The darrell automobile the benni. The darrell does not eat the sissy. The darrell is funded. The darrell does not see the benni. The allie bemock the darrell. The allie bemock the sissy. The allie automobile the sissy. The allie is convincing. The allie is funded. The allie perorate the sissy. The benni automobile the allie. The benni automobile the sissy. The benni is unbodied. The benni perorate the sissy. The sissy is clanking. If something is clanking then it does not chase the benni. If something bemock the benni then it automobile the allie. If something bemock the darrell and the darrell does not see the benni then the darrell bemock the benni. If something automobile the allie then it bemock the darrell. If the benni bemock the allie and the sissy does not eat the benni then the benni perorate the allie. If something perorate the allie then it automobile the sissy. If something is unbodied then it does not eat the darrell. If something bemock the benni then the benni bemock the allie. The darrell bemock the darrell.", "logic": "\nBemock(darrell, allie)\nAutomobile(darrell, benni)\nnot Automobile(darrell, sissy)\nFunded(darrell)\nnot Perorate(darrell, benni)\nBemock(allie, darrell)\nBemock(allie, sissy)\nAutomobile(allie, sissy)\nConvincing(allie)\nFunded(allie)\nPerorate(allie, sissy)\nAutomobile(benni, allie)\nAutomobile(benni, sissy)\nUnbodied(benni)\nPerorate(benni, sissy)\nClanking(sissy)\nforall x (Clanking(x) -> not Bemock(x, benni))\nforall x (Bemock(x, benni) -> Automobile(x, allie))\nforall x (Bemock(x, darrell) and not Perorate(darrell, benni) -> Bemock(darrell, benni))\nforall x (Automobile(x, allie) -> Bemock(x, darrell))\nBemock(benni, allie) and not Automobile(sissy, benni) -> Perorate(benni, allie)\nforall x (Perorate(x, allie) -> Automobile(x, sissy))\nforall x (Unbodied(x) -> not Automobile(x, darrell))\nforall x (Bemock(x, benni) -> Bemock(benni, allie))\n\nBemock(darrell, darrell)\n\nBemock(allie, darrell) and not Perorate(darrell, benni) and forall x (Bemock(x, darrell) and not Perorate(darrell, benni) -> Bemock(darrell, benni)) -> therefore Bemock(darrell, benni) Bemock(darrell, benni) and forall x (Bemock(x, benni) -> Automobile(x, allie)) -> therefore Automobile(darrell, allie) Automobile(darrell, allie) and forall x (Automobile(x, allie) -> Bemock(x, darrell)) -> therefore Bemock(darrell, darrell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The sibelle marinate the marijo. The sibelle dangle the milton. The sibelle does not eat the kathlin. The sibelle is frowzy. The sibelle does not see the milton. The marijo marinate the sibelle. The marijo marinate the kathlin. The marijo dangle the kathlin. The marijo is crapulent. The marijo is frowzy. The marijo intonate the kathlin. The milton dangle the marijo. The milton dangle the kathlin. The milton is sacrosanct. The milton intonate the kathlin. The kathlin is configured. If something is configured then it does not chase the milton. If something marinate the milton then it dangle the marijo. If something marinate the sibelle and the sibelle does not see the milton then the sibelle marinate the milton. If something dangle the marijo then it marinate the sibelle. If the milton marinate the marijo and the kathlin does not eat the milton then the milton intonate the marijo. If something intonate the marijo then it dangle the kathlin. If something is sacrosanct then it does not eat the sibelle. If something marinate the milton then the milton marinate the marijo. The sibelle does not chase the sibelle.", "logic": "\nMarinate(sibelle, marijo)\nDangle(sibelle, milton)\nnot Dangle(sibelle, kathlin)\nFrowzy(sibelle)\nnot Intonate(sibelle, milton)\nMarinate(marijo, sibelle)\nMarinate(marijo, kathlin)\nDangle(marijo, kathlin)\nCrapulent(marijo)\nFrowzy(marijo)\nIntonate(marijo, kathlin)\nDangle(milton, marijo)\nDangle(milton, kathlin)\nSacrosanct(milton)\nIntonate(milton, kathlin)\nConfigured(kathlin)\nforall x (Configured(x) -> not Marinate(x, milton))\nforall x (Marinate(x, milton) -> Dangle(x, marijo))\nforall x (Marinate(x, sibelle) and not Intonate(sibelle, milton) -> Marinate(sibelle, milton))\nforall x (Dangle(x, marijo) -> Marinate(x, sibelle))\nMarinate(milton, marijo) and not Dangle(kathlin, milton) -> Intonate(milton, marijo)\nforall x (Intonate(x, marijo) -> Dangle(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> not Dangle(x, sibelle))\nforall x (Marinate(x, milton) -> Marinate(milton, marijo))\n\nnot Marinate(sibelle, sibelle)\n\nMarinate(marijo, sibelle) and not Intonate(sibelle, milton) and forall x (Marinate(x, sibelle) and not Intonate(sibelle, milton) -> Marinate(sibelle, milton)) -> therefore Marinate(sibelle, milton) Marinate(sibelle, milton) and forall x (Marinate(x, milton) -> Dangle(x, marijo)) -> therefore Dangle(sibelle, marijo) Dangle(sibelle, marijo) and forall x (Dangle(x, marijo) -> Marinate(x, sibelle)) -> therefore Marinate(sibelle, sibelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The walsh croquet the aubert. The walsh vociferate the nadine. The walsh does not eat the ham. The walsh is laconic. The walsh does not see the nadine. The aubert croquet the walsh. The aubert croquet the ham. The aubert vociferate the ham. The aubert is ungrudging. The aubert is laconic. The aubert flesh the ham. The nadine vociferate the aubert. The nadine vociferate the ham. The nadine is fortissimo. The nadine flesh the ham. The ham is outdoorsy. If something is outdoorsy then it does not chase the nadine. If something croquet the nadine then it vociferate the aubert. If something croquet the walsh and the walsh does not see the nadine then the walsh croquet the nadine. If something vociferate the aubert then it croquet the walsh. If the nadine croquet the aubert and the ham does not eat the nadine then the nadine flesh the aubert. If something flesh the aubert then it vociferate the ham. If something is fortissimo then it does not eat the walsh. If something croquet the nadine then the nadine croquet the aubert. The ham does not chase the walsh.", "logic": "\nCroquet(walsh, aubert)\nVociferate(walsh, nadine)\nnot Vociferate(walsh, ham)\nLaconic(walsh)\nnot Flesh(walsh, nadine)\nCroquet(aubert, walsh)\nCroquet(aubert, ham)\nVociferate(aubert, ham)\nUngrudging(aubert)\nLaconic(aubert)\nFlesh(aubert, ham)\nVociferate(nadine, aubert)\nVociferate(nadine, ham)\nFortissimo(nadine)\nFlesh(nadine, ham)\nOutdoorsy(ham)\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) -> not Croquet(x, nadine))\nforall x (Croquet(x, nadine) -> Vociferate(x, aubert))\nforall x (Croquet(x, walsh) and not Flesh(walsh, nadine) -> Croquet(walsh, nadine))\nforall x (Vociferate(x, aubert) -> Croquet(x, walsh))\nCroquet(nadine, aubert) and not Vociferate(ham, nadine) -> Flesh(nadine, aubert)\nforall x (Flesh(x, aubert) -> Vociferate(x, ham))\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) -> not Vociferate(x, walsh))\nforall x (Croquet(x, nadine) -> Croquet(nadine, aubert))\n\nnot Croquet(ham, walsh)\n\nforall x (Vociferate(x, aubert) -> Croquet(x, walsh)) <- forall x (Croquet(x, nadine) -> Vociferate(x, aubert)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The debra formicate the harold. The debra strum the cindie. The debra does not eat the kee. The debra is unshielded. The debra does not see the cindie. The harold formicate the debra. The harold formicate the kee. The harold strum the kee. The harold is overgrown. The harold is unshielded. The harold aromatise the kee. The cindie strum the harold. The cindie strum the kee. The cindie is unabated. The cindie aromatise the kee. The kee is myalgic. If something is myalgic then it does not chase the cindie. If something formicate the cindie then it strum the harold. If something formicate the debra and the debra does not see the cindie then the debra formicate the cindie. If something strum the harold then it formicate the debra. If the cindie formicate the harold and the kee does not eat the cindie then the cindie aromatise the harold. If something aromatise the harold then it strum the kee. If something is unabated then it does not eat the debra. If something formicate the cindie then the cindie formicate the harold. The kee strum the harold.", "logic": "\nFormicate(debra, harold)\nStrum(debra, cindie)\nnot Strum(debra, kee)\nUnshielded(debra)\nnot Aromatise(debra, cindie)\nFormicate(harold, debra)\nFormicate(harold, kee)\nStrum(harold, kee)\nOvergrown(harold)\nUnshielded(harold)\nAromatise(harold, kee)\nStrum(cindie, harold)\nStrum(cindie, kee)\nUnabated(cindie)\nAromatise(cindie, kee)\nMyalgic(kee)\nforall x (Myalgic(x) -> not Formicate(x, cindie))\nforall x (Formicate(x, cindie) -> Strum(x, harold))\nforall x (Formicate(x, debra) and not Aromatise(debra, cindie) -> Formicate(debra, cindie))\nforall x (Strum(x, harold) -> Formicate(x, debra))\nFormicate(cindie, harold) and not Strum(kee, cindie) -> Aromatise(cindie, harold)\nforall x (Aromatise(x, harold) -> Strum(x, kee))\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> not Strum(x, debra))\nforall x (Formicate(x, cindie) -> Formicate(cindie, harold))\n\nStrum(kee, harold)\n\nforall x (Formicate(x, cindie) -> Strum(x, harold)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The zsazsa escort the greer. The zsazsa divert the elly. The zsazsa does not eat the milli. The zsazsa is pyrogenous. The zsazsa does not see the elly. The greer escort the zsazsa. The greer escort the milli. The greer divert the milli. The greer is flip. The greer is pyrogenous. The greer stampede the milli. The elly divert the greer. The elly divert the milli. The elly is fascistic. The elly stampede the milli. The milli is exhaustive. If something is exhaustive then it does not chase the elly. If something escort the elly then it divert the greer. If something escort the zsazsa and the zsazsa does not see the elly then the zsazsa escort the elly. If something divert the greer then it escort the zsazsa. If the elly escort the greer and the milli does not eat the elly then the elly stampede the greer. If something stampede the greer then it divert the milli. If something is fascistic then it does not eat the zsazsa. If something escort the elly then the elly escort the greer. The elly does not see the greer.", "logic": "\nEscort(zsazsa, greer)\nDivert(zsazsa, elly)\nnot Divert(zsazsa, milli)\nPyrogenous(zsazsa)\nnot Stampede(zsazsa, elly)\nEscort(greer, zsazsa)\nEscort(greer, milli)\nDivert(greer, milli)\nFlip(greer)\nPyrogenous(greer)\nStampede(greer, milli)\nDivert(elly, greer)\nDivert(elly, milli)\nFascistic(elly)\nStampede(elly, milli)\nExhaustive(milli)\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> not Escort(x, elly))\nforall x (Escort(x, elly) -> Divert(x, greer))\nforall x (Escort(x, zsazsa) and not Stampede(zsazsa, elly) -> Escort(zsazsa, elly))\nforall x (Divert(x, greer) -> Escort(x, zsazsa))\nEscort(elly, greer) and not Divert(milli, elly) -> Stampede(elly, greer)\nforall x (Stampede(x, greer) -> Divert(x, milli))\nforall x (Fascistic(x) -> not Divert(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Escort(x, elly) -> Escort(elly, greer))\n\nnot Stampede(elly, greer)\n\nEscort(elly, greer) and not Divert(milli, elly) -> Stampede(elly, greer) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The adelle hibernate the arnold. The adelle visa the levin. The adelle does not eat the maible. The adelle is palpebrate. The adelle does not see the levin. The arnold hibernate the adelle. The arnold hibernate the maible. The arnold visa the maible. The arnold is homegrown. The arnold is palpebrate. The arnold reprehend the maible. The levin visa the arnold. The levin visa the maible. The levin is identical. The levin reprehend the maible. The maible is unswerving. If something is unswerving then it does not chase the levin. If something hibernate the levin then it visa the arnold. If something hibernate the adelle and the adelle does not see the levin then the adelle hibernate the levin. If something visa the arnold then it hibernate the adelle. If the levin hibernate the arnold and the maible does not eat the levin then the levin reprehend the arnold. If something reprehend the arnold then it visa the maible. If something is identical then it does not eat the adelle. If something hibernate the levin then the levin hibernate the arnold. The arnold visa the arnold.", "logic": "\nHibernate(adelle, arnold)\nVisa(adelle, levin)\nnot Visa(adelle, maible)\nPalpebrate(adelle)\nnot Reprehend(adelle, levin)\nHibernate(arnold, adelle)\nHibernate(arnold, maible)\nVisa(arnold, maible)\nHomegrown(arnold)\nPalpebrate(arnold)\nReprehend(arnold, maible)\nVisa(levin, arnold)\nVisa(levin, maible)\nIdentical(levin)\nReprehend(levin, maible)\nUnswerving(maible)\nforall x (Unswerving(x) -> not Hibernate(x, levin))\nforall x (Hibernate(x, levin) -> Visa(x, arnold))\nforall x (Hibernate(x, adelle) and not Reprehend(adelle, levin) -> Hibernate(adelle, levin))\nforall x (Visa(x, arnold) -> Hibernate(x, adelle))\nHibernate(levin, arnold) and not Visa(maible, levin) -> Reprehend(levin, arnold)\nforall x (Reprehend(x, arnold) -> Visa(x, maible))\nforall x (Identical(x) -> not Visa(x, adelle))\nforall x (Hibernate(x, levin) -> Hibernate(levin, arnold))\n\nVisa(arnold, arnold)\n\nforall x (Hibernate(x, levin) -> Visa(x, arnold)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The joao unitize the taite. The joao dump the othilie. The joao does not eat the jim. The joao is twiggy. The joao does not see the othilie. The taite unitize the joao. The taite unitize the jim. The taite dump the jim. The taite is semiweekly. The taite is twiggy. The taite invalid the jim. The othilie dump the taite. The othilie dump the jim. The othilie is lettered. The othilie invalid the jim. The jim is abhorrent. If something is abhorrent then it does not chase the othilie. If something unitize the othilie then it dump the taite. If something unitize the joao and the joao does not see the othilie then the joao unitize the othilie. If something dump the taite then it unitize the joao. If the othilie unitize the taite and the jim does not eat the othilie then the othilie invalid the taite. If something invalid the taite then it dump the jim. If something is lettered then it does not eat the joao. If something unitize the othilie then the othilie unitize the taite. The joao does not see the joao.", "logic": "\nUnitize(joao, taite)\nDump(joao, othilie)\nnot Dump(joao, jim)\nTwiggy(joao)\nnot Invalid(joao, othilie)\nUnitize(taite, joao)\nUnitize(taite, jim)\nDump(taite, jim)\nSemiweekly(taite)\nTwiggy(taite)\nInvalid(taite, jim)\nDump(othilie, taite)\nDump(othilie, jim)\nLettered(othilie)\nInvalid(othilie, jim)\nAbhorrent(jim)\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) -> not Unitize(x, othilie))\nforall x (Unitize(x, othilie) -> Dump(x, taite))\nforall x (Unitize(x, joao) and not Invalid(joao, othilie) -> Unitize(joao, othilie))\nforall x (Dump(x, taite) -> Unitize(x, joao))\nUnitize(othilie, taite) and not Dump(jim, othilie) -> Invalid(othilie, taite)\nforall x (Invalid(x, taite) -> Dump(x, jim))\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> not Dump(x, joao))\nforall x (Unitize(x, othilie) -> Unitize(othilie, taite))\n\nnot Invalid(joao, joao)\n\nnot Invalid(joao, joao) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The sheela deaminize the say. The sheela rerun the dmitri. The sheela does not eat the jessika. The sheela is strenuous. The sheela does not see the dmitri. The say deaminize the sheela. The say deaminize the jessika. The say rerun the jessika. The say is overripe. The say is strenuous. The say moderate the jessika. The dmitri rerun the say. The dmitri rerun the jessika. The dmitri is quizzical. The dmitri moderate the jessika. The jessika is disliked. If something is disliked then it does not chase the dmitri. If something deaminize the dmitri then it rerun the say. If something deaminize the sheela and the sheela does not see the dmitri then the sheela deaminize the dmitri. If something rerun the say then it deaminize the sheela. If the dmitri deaminize the say and the jessika does not eat the dmitri then the dmitri moderate the say. If something moderate the say then it rerun the jessika. If something is quizzical then it does not eat the sheela. If something deaminize the dmitri then the dmitri deaminize the say. The sheela is disliked.", "logic": "\nDeaminize(sheela, say)\nRerun(sheela, dmitri)\nnot Rerun(sheela, jessika)\nStrenuous(sheela)\nnot Moderate(sheela, dmitri)\nDeaminize(say, sheela)\nDeaminize(say, jessika)\nRerun(say, jessika)\nOverripe(say)\nStrenuous(say)\nModerate(say, jessika)\nRerun(dmitri, say)\nRerun(dmitri, jessika)\nQuizzical(dmitri)\nModerate(dmitri, jessika)\nDisliked(jessika)\nforall x (Disliked(x) -> not Deaminize(x, dmitri))\nforall x (Deaminize(x, dmitri) -> Rerun(x, say))\nforall x (Deaminize(x, sheela) and not Moderate(sheela, dmitri) -> Deaminize(sheela, dmitri))\nforall x (Rerun(x, say) -> Deaminize(x, sheela))\nDeaminize(dmitri, say) and not Rerun(jessika, dmitri) -> Moderate(dmitri, say)\nforall x (Moderate(x, say) -> Rerun(x, jessika))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) -> not Rerun(x, sheela))\nforall x (Deaminize(x, dmitri) -> Deaminize(dmitri, say))\n\nDisliked(sheela)\n\nDisliked(sheela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The jewel glamour the frayda. The jewel feud the charleen. The jewel does not eat the maggie. The jewel is errhine. The jewel does not see the charleen. The frayda glamour the jewel. The frayda glamour the maggie. The frayda feud the maggie. The frayda is cystic. The frayda is errhine. The frayda endeavor the maggie. The charleen feud the frayda. The charleen feud the maggie. The charleen is drippy. The charleen endeavor the maggie. The maggie is dead. If something is dead then it does not chase the charleen. If something glamour the charleen then it feud the frayda. If something glamour the jewel and the jewel does not see the charleen then the jewel glamour the charleen. If something feud the frayda then it glamour the jewel. If the charleen glamour the frayda and the maggie does not eat the charleen then the charleen endeavor the frayda. If something endeavor the frayda then it feud the maggie. If something is drippy then it does not eat the jewel. If something glamour the charleen then the charleen glamour the frayda. The jewel is not drippy.", "logic": "\nGlamour(jewel, frayda)\nFeud(jewel, charleen)\nnot Feud(jewel, maggie)\nErrhine(jewel)\nnot Endeavor(jewel, charleen)\nGlamour(frayda, jewel)\nGlamour(frayda, maggie)\nFeud(frayda, maggie)\nCystic(frayda)\nErrhine(frayda)\nEndeavor(frayda, maggie)\nFeud(charleen, frayda)\nFeud(charleen, maggie)\nDrippy(charleen)\nEndeavor(charleen, maggie)\nDead(maggie)\nforall x (Dead(x) -> not Glamour(x, charleen))\nforall x (Glamour(x, charleen) -> Feud(x, frayda))\nforall x (Glamour(x, jewel) and not Endeavor(jewel, charleen) -> Glamour(jewel, charleen))\nforall x (Feud(x, frayda) -> Glamour(x, jewel))\nGlamour(charleen, frayda) and not Feud(maggie, charleen) -> Endeavor(charleen, frayda)\nforall x (Endeavor(x, frayda) -> Feud(x, maggie))\nforall x (Drippy(x) -> not Feud(x, jewel))\nforall x (Glamour(x, charleen) -> Glamour(charleen, frayda))\n\nnot Drippy(jewel)\n\nnot Drippy(jewel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The eryn unionise the liliane. The eryn biff the carree. The eryn does not eat the missie. The eryn is redemptory. The eryn does not see the carree. The liliane unionise the eryn. The liliane unionise the missie. The liliane biff the missie. The liliane is soggy. The liliane is redemptory. The liliane oppugn the missie. The carree biff the liliane. The carree biff the missie. The carree is sinuous. The carree oppugn the missie. The missie is perversive. If something is perversive then it does not chase the carree. If something unionise the carree then it biff the liliane. If something unionise the eryn and the eryn does not see the carree then the eryn unionise the carree. If something biff the liliane then it unionise the eryn. If the carree unionise the liliane and the missie does not eat the carree then the carree oppugn the liliane. If something oppugn the liliane then it biff the missie. If something is sinuous then it does not eat the eryn. If something unionise the carree then the carree unionise the liliane. The liliane biff the carree.", "logic": "\nUnionise(eryn, liliane)\nBiff(eryn, carree)\nnot Biff(eryn, missie)\nRedemptory(eryn)\nnot Oppugn(eryn, carree)\nUnionise(liliane, eryn)\nUnionise(liliane, missie)\nBiff(liliane, missie)\nSoggy(liliane)\nRedemptory(liliane)\nOppugn(liliane, missie)\nBiff(carree, liliane)\nBiff(carree, missie)\nSinuous(carree)\nOppugn(carree, missie)\nPerversive(missie)\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> not Unionise(x, carree))\nforall x (Unionise(x, carree) -> Biff(x, liliane))\nforall x (Unionise(x, eryn) and not Oppugn(eryn, carree) -> Unionise(eryn, carree))\nforall x (Biff(x, liliane) -> Unionise(x, eryn))\nUnionise(carree, liliane) and not Biff(missie, carree) -> Oppugn(carree, liliane)\nforall x (Oppugn(x, liliane) -> Biff(x, missie))\nforall x (Sinuous(x) -> not Biff(x, eryn))\nforall x (Unionise(x, carree) -> Unionise(carree, liliane))\n\nBiff(liliane, carree)\n\nBiff(liliane, carree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The patrick beat the brice. The patrick beat the fanya. The patrick is uniparous. The patrick is intuitive. The patrick shutter the brice. The patrick shutter the fanya. The patrick bellow the fanya. The brice beat the patrick. The brice beat the fanya. The brice shutter the patrick. The brice bellow the patrick. The fanya beat the patrick. The fanya is evenhanded. The fanya shutter the brice. The fanya bellow the brice. If someone is calyceal then they are intuitive. If someone beat the fanya then they eat the brice. If someone beat the fanya and the fanya shutter the patrick then the fanya beat the patrick. If someone beat the brice then they like the patrick. If the brice beat the fanya and the brice shutter the patrick then the fanya is blasting. If the patrick shutter the brice then the brice shutter the patrick. If someone is uniparous and they like the brice then the brice beat the patrick. If someone beat the patrick and they like the brice then they eat the fanya. The brice bellow the patrick.", "logic": "\nBeat(patrick, brice)\nBeat(patrick, fanya)\nUniparous(patrick)\nIntuitive(patrick)\nShutter(patrick, brice)\nShutter(patrick, fanya)\nBellow(patrick, fanya)\nBeat(brice, patrick)\nBeat(brice, fanya)\nShutter(brice, patrick)\nBellow(brice, patrick)\nBeat(fanya, patrick)\nEvenhanded(fanya)\nShutter(fanya, brice)\nBellow(fanya, brice)\nforall x (Calyceal(x) -> Intuitive(x))\nforall x (Beat(x, fanya) -> Beat(x, brice))\nforall x (Beat(x, fanya) and Shutter(fanya, patrick) -> Beat(fanya, patrick))\nforall x (Beat(x, brice) -> Shutter(x, patrick))\nBeat(brice, fanya) and Shutter(brice, patrick) -> Blasting(fanya)\nShutter(patrick, brice) -> Shutter(brice, patrick)\nforall x (Uniparous(x) and Shutter(x, brice) -> Beat(brice, patrick))\nforall x (Beat(x, patrick) and Shutter(x, brice) -> Beat(x, fanya))\n\nBellow(brice, patrick)\n\ntherefore Bellow(brice, patrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The alpa hamper the luana. The alpa hamper the charles. The alpa is whispered. The alpa is oaken. The alpa interrupt the luana. The alpa interrupt the charles. The alpa broach the charles. The luana hamper the alpa. The luana hamper the charles. The luana interrupt the alpa. The luana broach the alpa. The charles hamper the alpa. The charles is detached. The charles interrupt the luana. The charles broach the luana. If someone is frisky then they are oaken. If someone hamper the charles then they eat the luana. If someone hamper the charles and the charles interrupt the alpa then the charles hamper the alpa. If someone hamper the luana then they like the alpa. If the luana hamper the charles and the luana interrupt the alpa then the charles is exiguous. If the alpa interrupt the luana then the luana interrupt the alpa. If someone is whispered and they like the luana then the luana hamper the alpa. If someone hamper the alpa and they like the luana then they eat the charles. The luana does not eat the alpa.", "logic": "\nHamper(alpa, luana)\nHamper(alpa, charles)\nWhispered(alpa)\nOaken(alpa)\nInterrupt(alpa, luana)\nInterrupt(alpa, charles)\nBroach(alpa, charles)\nHamper(luana, alpa)\nHamper(luana, charles)\nInterrupt(luana, alpa)\nBroach(luana, alpa)\nHamper(charles, alpa)\nDetached(charles)\nInterrupt(charles, luana)\nBroach(charles, luana)\nforall x (Frisky(x) -> Oaken(x))\nforall x (Hamper(x, charles) -> Hamper(x, luana))\nforall x (Hamper(x, charles) and Interrupt(charles, alpa) -> Hamper(charles, alpa))\nforall x (Hamper(x, luana) -> Interrupt(x, alpa))\nHamper(luana, charles) and Interrupt(luana, alpa) -> Exiguous(charles)\nInterrupt(alpa, luana) -> Interrupt(luana, alpa)\nforall x (Whispered(x) and Interrupt(x, luana) -> Hamper(luana, alpa))\nforall x (Hamper(x, alpa) and Interrupt(x, luana) -> Hamper(x, charles))\n\nnot Hamper(luana, alpa)\n\ntherefore Hamper(luana, alpa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The ilise general the randie. The ilise general the ambrose. The ilise is rapacious. The ilise is dexter. The ilise kotow the randie. The ilise kotow the ambrose. The ilise resinate the ambrose. The randie general the ilise. The randie general the ambrose. The randie kotow the ilise. The randie resinate the ilise. The ambrose general the ilise. The ambrose is rental. The ambrose kotow the randie. The ambrose resinate the randie. If someone is broadside then they are dexter. If someone general the ambrose then they eat the randie. If someone general the ambrose and the ambrose kotow the ilise then the ambrose general the ilise. If someone general the randie then they like the ilise. If the randie general the ambrose and the randie kotow the ilise then the ambrose is exterior. If the ilise kotow the randie then the randie kotow the ilise. If someone is rapacious and they like the randie then the randie general the ilise. If someone general the ilise and they like the randie then they eat the ambrose. The ambrose is exterior.", "logic": "\nGeneral(ilise, randie)\nGeneral(ilise, ambrose)\nRapacious(ilise)\nDexter(ilise)\nKotow(ilise, randie)\nKotow(ilise, ambrose)\nResinate(ilise, ambrose)\nGeneral(randie, ilise)\nGeneral(randie, ambrose)\nKotow(randie, ilise)\nResinate(randie, ilise)\nGeneral(ambrose, ilise)\nRental(ambrose)\nKotow(ambrose, randie)\nResinate(ambrose, randie)\nforall x (Broadside(x) -> Dexter(x))\nforall x (General(x, ambrose) -> General(x, randie))\nforall x (General(x, ambrose) and Kotow(ambrose, ilise) -> General(ambrose, ilise))\nforall x (General(x, randie) -> Kotow(x, ilise))\nGeneral(randie, ambrose) and Kotow(randie, ilise) -> Exterior(ambrose)\nKotow(ilise, randie) -> Kotow(randie, ilise)\nforall x (Rapacious(x) and Kotow(x, randie) -> General(randie, ilise))\nforall x (General(x, ilise) and Kotow(x, randie) -> General(x, ambrose))\n\nExterior(ambrose)\n\nGeneral(randie, ambrose) and Kotow(randie, ilise) and General(randie, ambrose) and Kotow(randie, ilise) -> Exterior(ambrose) -> therefore Exterior(ambrose)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The dorree consult the murray. The dorree consult the fredelia. The dorree is rigid. The dorree is bismuthic. The dorree dehydrate the murray. The dorree dehydrate the fredelia. The dorree occupy the fredelia. The murray consult the dorree. The murray consult the fredelia. The murray dehydrate the dorree. The murray occupy the dorree. The fredelia consult the dorree. The fredelia is ossified. The fredelia dehydrate the murray. The fredelia occupy the murray. If someone is anionic then they are bismuthic. If someone consult the fredelia then they eat the murray. If someone consult the fredelia and the fredelia dehydrate the dorree then the fredelia consult the dorree. If someone consult the murray then they like the dorree. If the murray consult the fredelia and the murray dehydrate the dorree then the fredelia is caseous. If the dorree dehydrate the murray then the murray dehydrate the dorree. If someone is rigid and they like the murray then the murray consult the dorree. If someone consult the dorree and they like the murray then they eat the fredelia. The dorree does not like the dorree.", "logic": "\nConsult(dorree, murray)\nConsult(dorree, fredelia)\nRigid(dorree)\nBismuthic(dorree)\nDehydrate(dorree, murray)\nDehydrate(dorree, fredelia)\nOccupy(dorree, fredelia)\nConsult(murray, dorree)\nConsult(murray, fredelia)\nDehydrate(murray, dorree)\nOccupy(murray, dorree)\nConsult(fredelia, dorree)\nOssified(fredelia)\nDehydrate(fredelia, murray)\nOccupy(fredelia, murray)\nforall x (Anionic(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Consult(x, fredelia) -> Consult(x, murray))\nforall x (Consult(x, fredelia) and Dehydrate(fredelia, dorree) -> Consult(fredelia, dorree))\nforall x (Consult(x, murray) -> Dehydrate(x, dorree))\nConsult(murray, fredelia) and Dehydrate(murray, dorree) -> Caseous(fredelia)\nDehydrate(dorree, murray) -> Dehydrate(murray, dorree)\nforall x (Rigid(x) and Dehydrate(x, murray) -> Consult(murray, dorree))\nforall x (Consult(x, dorree) and Dehydrate(x, murray) -> Consult(x, fredelia))\n\nnot Dehydrate(dorree, dorree)\n\nConsult(dorree, murray) and forall x (Consult(x, murray) -> Dehydrate(x, dorree)) -> therefore Dehydrate(dorree, dorree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The taite formalize the charlotta. The taite formalize the vale. The taite is albanian. The taite is arrayed. The taite stack the charlotta. The taite stack the vale. The taite perturb the vale. The charlotta formalize the taite. The charlotta formalize the vale. The charlotta stack the taite. The charlotta perturb the taite. The vale formalize the taite. The vale is positivist. The vale stack the charlotta. The vale perturb the charlotta. If someone is scabby then they are arrayed. If someone formalize the vale then they eat the charlotta. If someone formalize the vale and the vale stack the taite then the vale formalize the taite. If someone formalize the charlotta then they like the taite. If the charlotta formalize the vale and the charlotta stack the taite then the vale is estival. If the taite stack the charlotta then the charlotta stack the taite. If someone is albanian and they like the charlotta then the charlotta formalize the taite. If someone formalize the taite and they like the charlotta then they eat the vale. The vale formalize the charlotta.", "logic": "\nFormalize(taite, charlotta)\nFormalize(taite, vale)\nAlbanian(taite)\nArrayed(taite)\nStack(taite, charlotta)\nStack(taite, vale)\nPerturb(taite, vale)\nFormalize(charlotta, taite)\nFormalize(charlotta, vale)\nStack(charlotta, taite)\nPerturb(charlotta, taite)\nFormalize(vale, taite)\nPositivist(vale)\nStack(vale, charlotta)\nPerturb(vale, charlotta)\nforall x (Scabby(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nforall x (Formalize(x, vale) -> Formalize(x, charlotta))\nforall x (Formalize(x, vale) and Stack(vale, taite) -> Formalize(vale, taite))\nforall x (Formalize(x, charlotta) -> Stack(x, taite))\nFormalize(charlotta, vale) and Stack(charlotta, taite) -> Estival(vale)\nStack(taite, charlotta) -> Stack(charlotta, taite)\nforall x (Albanian(x) and Stack(x, charlotta) -> Formalize(charlotta, taite))\nforall x (Formalize(x, taite) and Stack(x, charlotta) -> Formalize(x, vale))\n\nFormalize(vale, charlotta)\n\nFormalize(vale, taite) and Stack(vale, charlotta) and forall x (Formalize(x, taite) and Stack(x, charlotta) -> Formalize(x, vale)) -> therefore Formalize(vale, vale) Formalize(vale, vale) and forall x (Formalize(x, vale) -> Formalize(x, charlotta)) -> therefore Formalize(vale, charlotta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The marleah nark the forrester. The marleah nark the cammie. The marleah is crowned. The marleah is monoicous. The marleah require the forrester. The marleah require the cammie. The marleah psalm the cammie. The forrester nark the marleah. The forrester nark the cammie. The forrester require the marleah. The forrester psalm the marleah. The cammie nark the marleah. The cammie is mucous. The cammie require the forrester. The cammie psalm the forrester. If someone is unflurried then they are monoicous. If someone nark the cammie then they eat the forrester. If someone nark the cammie and the cammie require the marleah then the cammie nark the marleah. If someone nark the forrester then they like the marleah. If the forrester nark the cammie and the forrester require the marleah then the cammie is washable. If the marleah require the forrester then the forrester require the marleah. If someone is crowned and they like the forrester then the forrester nark the marleah. If someone nark the marleah and they like the forrester then they eat the cammie. The cammie does not eat the forrester.", "logic": "\nNark(marleah, forrester)\nNark(marleah, cammie)\nCrowned(marleah)\nMonoicous(marleah)\nRequire(marleah, forrester)\nRequire(marleah, cammie)\nPsalm(marleah, cammie)\nNark(forrester, marleah)\nNark(forrester, cammie)\nRequire(forrester, marleah)\nPsalm(forrester, marleah)\nNark(cammie, marleah)\nMucous(cammie)\nRequire(cammie, forrester)\nPsalm(cammie, forrester)\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Monoicous(x))\nforall x (Nark(x, cammie) -> Nark(x, forrester))\nforall x (Nark(x, cammie) and Require(cammie, marleah) -> Nark(cammie, marleah))\nforall x (Nark(x, forrester) -> Require(x, marleah))\nNark(forrester, cammie) and Require(forrester, marleah) -> Washable(cammie)\nRequire(marleah, forrester) -> Require(forrester, marleah)\nforall x (Crowned(x) and Require(x, forrester) -> Nark(forrester, marleah))\nforall x (Nark(x, marleah) and Require(x, forrester) -> Nark(x, cammie))\n\nnot Nark(cammie, forrester)\n\nNark(cammie, marleah) and Require(cammie, forrester) and forall x (Nark(x, marleah) and Require(x, forrester) -> Nark(x, cammie)) -> therefore Nark(cammie, cammie) Nark(cammie, cammie) and forall x (Nark(x, cammie) -> Nark(x, forrester)) -> therefore Nark(cammie, forrester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The cindie delegate the idalia. The cindie delegate the forest. The cindie is fated. The cindie is regressive. The cindie revere the idalia. The cindie revere the forest. The cindie hiss the forest. The idalia delegate the cindie. The idalia delegate the forest. The idalia revere the cindie. The idalia hiss the cindie. The forest delegate the cindie. The forest is curtained. The forest revere the idalia. The forest hiss the idalia. If someone is gilt then they are regressive. If someone delegate the forest then they eat the idalia. If someone delegate the forest and the forest revere the cindie then the forest delegate the cindie. If someone delegate the idalia then they like the cindie. If the idalia delegate the forest and the idalia revere the cindie then the forest is ruby. If the cindie revere the idalia then the idalia revere the cindie. If someone is fated and they like the idalia then the idalia delegate the cindie. If someone delegate the cindie and they like the idalia then they eat the forest. The forest revere the cindie.", "logic": "\nDelegate(cindie, idalia)\nDelegate(cindie, forest)\nFated(cindie)\nRegressive(cindie)\nRevere(cindie, idalia)\nRevere(cindie, forest)\nHiss(cindie, forest)\nDelegate(idalia, cindie)\nDelegate(idalia, forest)\nRevere(idalia, cindie)\nHiss(idalia, cindie)\nDelegate(forest, cindie)\nCurtained(forest)\nRevere(forest, idalia)\nHiss(forest, idalia)\nforall x (Gilt(x) -> Regressive(x))\nforall x (Delegate(x, forest) -> Delegate(x, idalia))\nforall x (Delegate(x, forest) and Revere(forest, cindie) -> Delegate(forest, cindie))\nforall x (Delegate(x, idalia) -> Revere(x, cindie))\nDelegate(idalia, forest) and Revere(idalia, cindie) -> Ruby(forest)\nRevere(cindie, idalia) -> Revere(idalia, cindie)\nforall x (Fated(x) and Revere(x, idalia) -> Delegate(idalia, cindie))\nforall x (Delegate(x, cindie) and Revere(x, idalia) -> Delegate(x, forest))\n\nRevere(forest, cindie)\n\nDelegate(forest, cindie) and Revere(forest, idalia) and forall x (Delegate(x, cindie) and Revere(x, idalia) -> Delegate(x, forest)) -> therefore Delegate(forest, forest) Delegate(forest, forest) and forall x (Delegate(x, forest) -> Delegate(x, idalia)) -> therefore Delegate(forest, idalia) Delegate(forest, idalia) and forall x (Delegate(x, idalia) -> Revere(x, cindie)) -> therefore Revere(forest, cindie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The stuart currycomb the sayers. The stuart currycomb the michael. The stuart is diadromous. The stuart is earthly. The stuart roll the sayers. The stuart roll the michael. The stuart cavern the michael. The sayers currycomb the stuart. The sayers currycomb the michael. The sayers roll the stuart. The sayers cavern the stuart. The michael currycomb the stuart. The michael is supernal. The michael roll the sayers. The michael cavern the sayers. If someone is ready then they are earthly. If someone currycomb the michael then they eat the sayers. If someone currycomb the michael and the michael roll the stuart then the michael currycomb the stuart. If someone currycomb the sayers then they like the stuart. If the sayers currycomb the michael and the sayers roll the stuart then the michael is gaping. If the stuart roll the sayers then the sayers roll the stuart. If someone is diadromous and they like the sayers then the sayers currycomb the stuart. If someone currycomb the stuart and they like the sayers then they eat the michael. The michael does not like the stuart.", "logic": "\nCurrycomb(stuart, sayers)\nCurrycomb(stuart, michael)\nDiadromous(stuart)\nEarthly(stuart)\nRoll(stuart, sayers)\nRoll(stuart, michael)\nCavern(stuart, michael)\nCurrycomb(sayers, stuart)\nCurrycomb(sayers, michael)\nRoll(sayers, stuart)\nCavern(sayers, stuart)\nCurrycomb(michael, stuart)\nSupernal(michael)\nRoll(michael, sayers)\nCavern(michael, sayers)\nforall x (Ready(x) -> Earthly(x))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, michael) -> Currycomb(x, sayers))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, michael) and Roll(michael, stuart) -> Currycomb(michael, stuart))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, sayers) -> Roll(x, stuart))\nCurrycomb(sayers, michael) and Roll(sayers, stuart) -> Gaping(michael)\nRoll(stuart, sayers) -> Roll(sayers, stuart)\nforall x (Diadromous(x) and Roll(x, sayers) -> Currycomb(sayers, stuart))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, stuart) and Roll(x, sayers) -> Currycomb(x, michael))\n\nnot Roll(michael, stuart)\n\nCurrycomb(michael, stuart) and Roll(michael, sayers) and forall x (Currycomb(x, stuart) and Roll(x, sayers) -> Currycomb(x, michael)) -> therefore Currycomb(michael, michael) Currycomb(michael, michael) and forall x (Currycomb(x, michael) -> Currycomb(x, sayers)) -> therefore Currycomb(michael, sayers) Currycomb(michael, sayers) and forall x (Currycomb(x, sayers) -> Roll(x, stuart)) -> therefore Roll(michael, stuart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The camila conglobe the sallee. The camila conglobe the ulrick. The camila is scholarly. The camila is live. The camila gestate the sallee. The camila gestate the ulrick. The camila yodel the ulrick. The sallee conglobe the camila. The sallee conglobe the ulrick. The sallee gestate the camila. The sallee yodel the camila. The ulrick conglobe the camila. The ulrick is elysian. The ulrick gestate the sallee. The ulrick yodel the sallee. If someone is cerulean then they are live. If someone conglobe the ulrick then they eat the sallee. If someone conglobe the ulrick and the ulrick gestate the camila then the ulrick conglobe the camila. If someone conglobe the sallee then they like the camila. If the sallee conglobe the ulrick and the sallee gestate the camila then the ulrick is liii. If the camila gestate the sallee then the sallee gestate the camila. If someone is scholarly and they like the sallee then the sallee conglobe the camila. If someone conglobe the camila and they like the sallee then they eat the ulrick. The sallee is not live.", "logic": "\nConglobe(camila, sallee)\nConglobe(camila, ulrick)\nScholarly(camila)\nLive(camila)\nGestate(camila, sallee)\nGestate(camila, ulrick)\nYodel(camila, ulrick)\nConglobe(sallee, camila)\nConglobe(sallee, ulrick)\nGestate(sallee, camila)\nYodel(sallee, camila)\nConglobe(ulrick, camila)\nElysian(ulrick)\nGestate(ulrick, sallee)\nYodel(ulrick, sallee)\nforall x (Cerulean(x) -> Live(x))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, ulrick) -> Conglobe(x, sallee))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, ulrick) and Gestate(ulrick, camila) -> Conglobe(ulrick, camila))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, sallee) -> Gestate(x, camila))\nConglobe(sallee, ulrick) and Gestate(sallee, camila) -> Liii(ulrick)\nGestate(camila, sallee) -> Gestate(sallee, camila)\nforall x (Scholarly(x) and Gestate(x, sallee) -> Conglobe(sallee, camila))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, camila) and Gestate(x, sallee) -> Conglobe(x, ulrick))\n\nnot Live(sallee)\n\nforall x (Cerulean(x) -> Live(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The nadia fornicate the mercie. The nadia fornicate the maren. The nadia is english. The nadia is pneumatic. The nadia channelise the mercie. The nadia channelise the maren. The nadia demur the maren. The mercie fornicate the nadia. The mercie fornicate the maren. The mercie channelise the nadia. The mercie demur the nadia. The maren fornicate the nadia. The maren is cephalic. The maren channelise the mercie. The maren demur the mercie. If someone is loutish then they are pneumatic. If someone fornicate the maren then they eat the mercie. If someone fornicate the maren and the maren channelise the nadia then the maren fornicate the nadia. If someone fornicate the mercie then they like the nadia. If the mercie fornicate the maren and the mercie channelise the nadia then the maren is dumb. If the nadia channelise the mercie then the mercie channelise the nadia. If someone is english and they like the mercie then the mercie fornicate the nadia. If someone fornicate the nadia and they like the mercie then they eat the maren. The maren is pneumatic.", "logic": "\nFornicate(nadia, mercie)\nFornicate(nadia, maren)\nEnglish(nadia)\nPneumatic(nadia)\nChannelise(nadia, mercie)\nChannelise(nadia, maren)\nDemur(nadia, maren)\nFornicate(mercie, nadia)\nFornicate(mercie, maren)\nChannelise(mercie, nadia)\nDemur(mercie, nadia)\nFornicate(maren, nadia)\nCephalic(maren)\nChannelise(maren, mercie)\nDemur(maren, mercie)\nforall x (Loutish(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Fornicate(x, maren) -> Fornicate(x, mercie))\nforall x (Fornicate(x, maren) and Channelise(maren, nadia) -> Fornicate(maren, nadia))\nforall x (Fornicate(x, mercie) -> Channelise(x, nadia))\nFornicate(mercie, maren) and Channelise(mercie, nadia) -> Dumb(maren)\nChannelise(nadia, mercie) -> Channelise(mercie, nadia)\nforall x (English(x) and Channelise(x, mercie) -> Fornicate(mercie, nadia))\nforall x (Fornicate(x, nadia) and Channelise(x, mercie) -> Fornicate(x, maren))\n\nPneumatic(maren)\n\nforall x (Loutish(x) -> Pneumatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The abram elute the charla. The abram elute the florinda. The abram is hallowed. The abram is rampant. The abram hoot the charla. The abram hoot the florinda. The abram slice the florinda. The charla elute the abram. The charla elute the florinda. The charla hoot the abram. The charla slice the abram. The florinda elute the abram. The florinda is burrlike. The florinda hoot the charla. The florinda slice the charla. If someone is peaceful then they are rampant. If someone elute the florinda then they eat the charla. If someone elute the florinda and the florinda hoot the abram then the florinda elute the abram. If someone elute the charla then they like the abram. If the charla elute the florinda and the charla hoot the abram then the florinda is perverted. If the abram hoot the charla then the charla hoot the abram. If someone is hallowed and they like the charla then the charla elute the abram. If someone elute the abram and they like the charla then they eat the florinda. The abram does not visit the abram.", "logic": "\nElute(abram, charla)\nElute(abram, florinda)\nHallowed(abram)\nRampant(abram)\nHoot(abram, charla)\nHoot(abram, florinda)\nSlice(abram, florinda)\nElute(charla, abram)\nElute(charla, florinda)\nHoot(charla, abram)\nSlice(charla, abram)\nElute(florinda, abram)\nBurrlike(florinda)\nHoot(florinda, charla)\nSlice(florinda, charla)\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Rampant(x))\nforall x (Elute(x, florinda) -> Elute(x, charla))\nforall x (Elute(x, florinda) and Hoot(florinda, abram) -> Elute(florinda, abram))\nforall x (Elute(x, charla) -> Hoot(x, abram))\nElute(charla, florinda) and Hoot(charla, abram) -> Perverted(florinda)\nHoot(abram, charla) -> Hoot(charla, abram)\nforall x (Hallowed(x) and Hoot(x, charla) -> Elute(charla, abram))\nforall x (Elute(x, abram) and Hoot(x, charla) -> Elute(x, florinda))\n\nnot Slice(abram, abram)\n\nnot Slice(abram, abram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The stanley defalcate the rusty. The stanley defalcate the berget. The stanley is epidural. The stanley is modest. The stanley foolproof the rusty. The stanley foolproof the berget. The stanley tampon the berget. The rusty defalcate the stanley. The rusty defalcate the berget. The rusty foolproof the stanley. The rusty tampon the stanley. The berget defalcate the stanley. The berget is breakable. The berget foolproof the rusty. The berget tampon the rusty. If someone is voluntary then they are modest. If someone defalcate the berget then they eat the rusty. If someone defalcate the berget and the berget foolproof the stanley then the berget defalcate the stanley. If someone defalcate the rusty then they like the stanley. If the rusty defalcate the berget and the rusty foolproof the stanley then the berget is stalkless. If the stanley foolproof the rusty then the rusty foolproof the stanley. If someone is epidural and they like the rusty then the rusty defalcate the stanley. If someone defalcate the stanley and they like the rusty then they eat the berget. The stanley is breakable.", "logic": "\nDefalcate(stanley, rusty)\nDefalcate(stanley, berget)\nEpidural(stanley)\nModest(stanley)\nFoolproof(stanley, rusty)\nFoolproof(stanley, berget)\nTampon(stanley, berget)\nDefalcate(rusty, stanley)\nDefalcate(rusty, berget)\nFoolproof(rusty, stanley)\nTampon(rusty, stanley)\nDefalcate(berget, stanley)\nBreakable(berget)\nFoolproof(berget, rusty)\nTampon(berget, rusty)\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Modest(x))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, berget) -> Defalcate(x, rusty))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, berget) and Foolproof(berget, stanley) -> Defalcate(berget, stanley))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, rusty) -> Foolproof(x, stanley))\nDefalcate(rusty, berget) and Foolproof(rusty, stanley) -> Stalkless(berget)\nFoolproof(stanley, rusty) -> Foolproof(rusty, stanley)\nforall x (Epidural(x) and Foolproof(x, rusty) -> Defalcate(rusty, stanley))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, stanley) and Foolproof(x, rusty) -> Defalcate(x, berget))\n\nBreakable(stanley)\n\nBreakable(stanley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The biff berate the meara. The biff berate the vivien. The biff is calendered. The biff is fumbling. The biff ricochet the meara. The biff ricochet the vivien. The biff condemn the vivien. The meara berate the biff. The meara berate the vivien. The meara ricochet the biff. The meara condemn the biff. The vivien berate the biff. The vivien is centrist. The vivien ricochet the meara. The vivien condemn the meara. If someone is unexampled then they are fumbling. If someone berate the vivien then they eat the meara. If someone berate the vivien and the vivien ricochet the biff then the vivien berate the biff. If someone berate the meara then they like the biff. If the meara berate the vivien and the meara ricochet the biff then the vivien is waspish. If the biff ricochet the meara then the meara ricochet the biff. If someone is calendered and they like the meara then the meara berate the biff. If someone berate the biff and they like the meara then they eat the vivien. The biff does not visit the meara.", "logic": "\nBerate(biff, meara)\nBerate(biff, vivien)\nCalendered(biff)\nFumbling(biff)\nRicochet(biff, meara)\nRicochet(biff, vivien)\nCondemn(biff, vivien)\nBerate(meara, biff)\nBerate(meara, vivien)\nRicochet(meara, biff)\nCondemn(meara, biff)\nBerate(vivien, biff)\nCentrist(vivien)\nRicochet(vivien, meara)\nCondemn(vivien, meara)\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Fumbling(x))\nforall x (Berate(x, vivien) -> Berate(x, meara))\nforall x (Berate(x, vivien) and Ricochet(vivien, biff) -> Berate(vivien, biff))\nforall x (Berate(x, meara) -> Ricochet(x, biff))\nBerate(meara, vivien) and Ricochet(meara, biff) -> Waspish(vivien)\nRicochet(biff, meara) -> Ricochet(meara, biff)\nforall x (Calendered(x) and Ricochet(x, meara) -> Berate(meara, biff))\nforall x (Berate(x, biff) and Ricochet(x, meara) -> Berate(x, vivien))\n\nnot Condemn(biff, meara)\n\nnot Condemn(biff, meara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The gisella decelerate the renato. The gisella decelerate the robert. The gisella is unkeyed. The gisella is enate. The gisella outweigh the renato. The gisella outweigh the robert. The gisella abscond the robert. The renato decelerate the gisella. The renato decelerate the robert. The renato outweigh the gisella. The renato abscond the gisella. The robert decelerate the gisella. The robert is edentulous. The robert outweigh the renato. The robert abscond the renato. If someone is bladdery then they are enate. If someone decelerate the robert then they eat the renato. If someone decelerate the robert and the robert outweigh the gisella then the robert decelerate the gisella. If someone decelerate the renato then they like the gisella. If the renato decelerate the robert and the renato outweigh the gisella then the robert is phosphoric. If the gisella outweigh the renato then the renato outweigh the gisella. If someone is unkeyed and they like the renato then the renato decelerate the gisella. If someone decelerate the gisella and they like the renato then they eat the robert. The gisella is bladdery.", "logic": "\nDecelerate(gisella, renato)\nDecelerate(gisella, robert)\nUnkeyed(gisella)\nEnate(gisella)\nOutweigh(gisella, renato)\nOutweigh(gisella, robert)\nAbscond(gisella, robert)\nDecelerate(renato, gisella)\nDecelerate(renato, robert)\nOutweigh(renato, gisella)\nAbscond(renato, gisella)\nDecelerate(robert, gisella)\nEdentulous(robert)\nOutweigh(robert, renato)\nAbscond(robert, renato)\nforall x (Bladdery(x) -> Enate(x))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, robert) -> Decelerate(x, renato))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, robert) and Outweigh(robert, gisella) -> Decelerate(robert, gisella))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, renato) -> Outweigh(x, gisella))\nDecelerate(renato, robert) and Outweigh(renato, gisella) -> Phosphoric(robert)\nOutweigh(gisella, renato) -> Outweigh(renato, gisella)\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) and Outweigh(x, renato) -> Decelerate(renato, gisella))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, gisella) and Outweigh(x, renato) -> Decelerate(x, robert))\n\nBladdery(gisella)\n\nBladdery(gisella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The raine shimmer the mildred. The raine shimmer the cassy. The raine is indisposed. The raine is untuneful. The raine famish the mildred. The raine famish the cassy. The raine placate the cassy. The mildred shimmer the raine. The mildred shimmer the cassy. The mildred famish the raine. The mildred placate the raine. The cassy shimmer the raine. The cassy is fouled. The cassy famish the mildred. The cassy placate the mildred. If someone is nary then they are untuneful. If someone shimmer the cassy then they eat the mildred. If someone shimmer the cassy and the cassy famish the raine then the cassy shimmer the raine. If someone shimmer the mildred then they like the raine. If the mildred shimmer the cassy and the mildred famish the raine then the cassy is bicolor. If the raine famish the mildred then the mildred famish the raine. If someone is indisposed and they like the mildred then the mildred shimmer the raine. If someone shimmer the raine and they like the mildred then they eat the cassy. The cassy does not visit the raine.", "logic": "\nShimmer(raine, mildred)\nShimmer(raine, cassy)\nIndisposed(raine)\nUntuneful(raine)\nFamish(raine, mildred)\nFamish(raine, cassy)\nPlacate(raine, cassy)\nShimmer(mildred, raine)\nShimmer(mildred, cassy)\nFamish(mildred, raine)\nPlacate(mildred, raine)\nShimmer(cassy, raine)\nFouled(cassy)\nFamish(cassy, mildred)\nPlacate(cassy, mildred)\nforall x (Nary(x) -> Untuneful(x))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, cassy) -> Shimmer(x, mildred))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, cassy) and Famish(cassy, raine) -> Shimmer(cassy, raine))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, mildred) -> Famish(x, raine))\nShimmer(mildred, cassy) and Famish(mildred, raine) -> Bicolor(cassy)\nFamish(raine, mildred) -> Famish(mildred, raine)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and Famish(x, mildred) -> Shimmer(mildred, raine))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, raine) and Famish(x, mildred) -> Shimmer(x, cassy))\n\nnot Placate(cassy, raine)\n\nnot Placate(cassy, raine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The cookie defeat the brody. The cookie defeat the judie. The cookie is irritated. The cookie is bilingual. The cookie elate the brody. The cookie elate the judie. The cookie patent the judie. The brody defeat the cookie. The brody defeat the judie. The brody elate the cookie. The brody patent the cookie. The judie defeat the cookie. The judie is texan. The judie elate the brody. The judie patent the brody. If someone is surgical then they are bilingual. If someone defeat the judie then they eat the brody. If someone defeat the judie and the judie elate the cookie then the judie defeat the cookie. If someone defeat the brody then they like the cookie. If the brody defeat the judie and the brody elate the cookie then the judie is xxiii. If the cookie elate the brody then the brody elate the cookie. If someone is irritated and they like the brody then the brody defeat the cookie. If someone defeat the cookie and they like the brody then they eat the judie. The brody is surgical.", "logic": "\nDefeat(cookie, brody)\nDefeat(cookie, judie)\nIrritated(cookie)\nBilingual(cookie)\nElate(cookie, brody)\nElate(cookie, judie)\nPatent(cookie, judie)\nDefeat(brody, cookie)\nDefeat(brody, judie)\nElate(brody, cookie)\nPatent(brody, cookie)\nDefeat(judie, cookie)\nTexan(judie)\nElate(judie, brody)\nPatent(judie, brody)\nforall x (Surgical(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nforall x (Defeat(x, judie) -> Defeat(x, brody))\nforall x (Defeat(x, judie) and Elate(judie, cookie) -> Defeat(judie, cookie))\nforall x (Defeat(x, brody) -> Elate(x, cookie))\nDefeat(brody, judie) and Elate(brody, cookie) -> Xxiii(judie)\nElate(cookie, brody) -> Elate(brody, cookie)\nforall x (Irritated(x) and Elate(x, brody) -> Defeat(brody, cookie))\nforall x (Defeat(x, cookie) and Elate(x, brody) -> Defeat(x, judie))\n\nSurgical(brody)\n\nSurgical(brody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The stevena settle the lesli. The stevena smooth the lesli. The lesli smooth the stevena. If someone is diarrhetic then they chase the lesli. If someone settle the stevena then the stevena grouse the lesli. If someone is thenar and they chase the lesli then they chase the stevena. If someone grouse the lesli then they are diarrhetic. If the lesli grouse the stevena and the stevena settle the lesli then the stevena is sweeping. If the stevena smooth the lesli then the lesli settle the stevena. If someone is brutal then they chase the lesli. If the lesli grouse the stevena and the lesli is sweeping then the stevena is fossilized. The stevena settle the lesli.", "logic": "\nSettle(stevena, lesli)\nSmooth(stevena, lesli)\nSmooth(lesli, stevena)\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) -> Settle(x, lesli))\nforall x (Settle(x, stevena) -> Grouse(stevena, lesli))\nforall x (Thenar(x) and Settle(x, lesli) -> Settle(x, stevena))\nforall x (Grouse(x, lesli) -> Diarrhetic(x))\nGrouse(lesli, stevena) and Settle(stevena, lesli) -> Sweeping(stevena)\nSmooth(stevena, lesli) -> Settle(lesli, stevena)\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Settle(x, lesli))\nGrouse(lesli, stevena) and Sweeping(lesli) -> Fossilized(stevena)\n\nSettle(stevena, lesli)\n\ntherefore Settle(stevena, lesli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The amie twist the cristal. The amie rewrite the cristal. The cristal rewrite the amie. If someone is urogenital then they chase the cristal. If someone twist the amie then the amie anodise the cristal. If someone is unproved and they chase the cristal then they chase the amie. If someone anodise the cristal then they are urogenital. If the cristal anodise the amie and the amie twist the cristal then the amie is tardive. If the amie rewrite the cristal then the cristal twist the amie. If someone is forcipate then they chase the cristal. If the cristal anodise the amie and the cristal is tardive then the amie is tubed. The cristal does not need the amie.", "logic": "\nTwist(amie, cristal)\nRewrite(amie, cristal)\nRewrite(cristal, amie)\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Twist(x, cristal))\nforall x (Twist(x, amie) -> Anodise(amie, cristal))\nforall x (Unproved(x) and Twist(x, cristal) -> Twist(x, amie))\nforall x (Anodise(x, cristal) -> Urogenital(x))\nAnodise(cristal, amie) and Twist(amie, cristal) -> Tardive(amie)\nRewrite(amie, cristal) -> Twist(cristal, amie)\nforall x (Forcipate(x) -> Twist(x, cristal))\nAnodise(cristal, amie) and Tardive(cristal) -> Tubed(amie)\n\nnot Rewrite(cristal, amie)\n\ntherefore Rewrite(cristal, amie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The trenna unbroken the ozzy. The trenna protrude the ozzy. The ozzy protrude the trenna. If someone is unbroken then they chase the ozzy. If someone unbroken the trenna then the trenna nutate the ozzy. If someone is indistinct and they chase the ozzy then they chase the trenna. If someone nutate the ozzy then they are unbroken. If the ozzy nutate the trenna and the trenna unbroken the ozzy then the trenna is formosan. If the trenna protrude the ozzy then the ozzy unbroken the trenna. If someone is weird then they chase the ozzy. If the ozzy nutate the trenna and the ozzy is formosan then the trenna is vigilant. The ozzy unbroken the trenna.", "logic": "\nBlue(trenna, ozzy)\nProtrude(trenna, ozzy)\nProtrude(ozzy, trenna)\nforall x (Unbroken(x) -> Blue(x, ozzy))\nforall x (Blue(x, trenna) -> Nutate(trenna, ozzy))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) and Blue(x, ozzy) -> Blue(x, trenna))\nforall x (Nutate(x, ozzy) -> Unbroken(x))\nNutate(ozzy, trenna) and Blue(trenna, ozzy) -> Formosan(trenna)\nProtrude(trenna, ozzy) -> Blue(ozzy, trenna)\nforall x (Weird(x) -> Blue(x, ozzy))\nNutate(ozzy, trenna) and Formosan(ozzy) -> Vigilant(trenna)\n\nBlue(ozzy, trenna)\n\nProtrude(trenna, ozzy) and Protrude(trenna, ozzy) -> Blue(ozzy, trenna) -> therefore Blue(ozzy, trenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The mimi hobnail the sybyl. The mimi annihilate the sybyl. The sybyl annihilate the mimi. If someone is turbid then they chase the sybyl. If someone hobnail the mimi then the mimi clarion the sybyl. If someone is amusive and they chase the sybyl then they chase the mimi. If someone clarion the sybyl then they are turbid. If the sybyl clarion the mimi and the mimi hobnail the sybyl then the mimi is unoriented. If the mimi annihilate the sybyl then the sybyl hobnail the mimi. If someone is cheerless then they chase the sybyl. If the sybyl clarion the mimi and the sybyl is unoriented then the mimi is gemmed. The sybyl does not chase the mimi.", "logic": "\nHobnail(mimi, sybyl)\nAnnihilate(mimi, sybyl)\nAnnihilate(sybyl, mimi)\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> Hobnail(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Hobnail(x, mimi) -> Clarion(mimi, sybyl))\nforall x (Amusive(x) and Hobnail(x, sybyl) -> Hobnail(x, mimi))\nforall x (Clarion(x, sybyl) -> Turbid(x))\nClarion(sybyl, mimi) and Hobnail(mimi, sybyl) -> Unoriented(mimi)\nAnnihilate(mimi, sybyl) -> Hobnail(sybyl, mimi)\nforall x (Cheerless(x) -> Hobnail(x, sybyl))\nClarion(sybyl, mimi) and Unoriented(sybyl) -> Gemmed(mimi)\n\nnot Hobnail(sybyl, mimi)\n\nAnnihilate(mimi, sybyl) and Annihilate(mimi, sybyl) -> Hobnail(sybyl, mimi) -> therefore Hobnail(sybyl, mimi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The georgena cool the karina. The georgena fantasize the karina. The karina fantasize the georgena. If someone is mean then they chase the karina. If someone cool the georgena then the georgena vowelise the karina. If someone is vegetive and they chase the karina then they chase the georgena. If someone vowelise the karina then they are mean. If the karina vowelise the georgena and the georgena cool the karina then the georgena is lilac. If the georgena fantasize the karina then the karina cool the georgena. If someone is momentous then they chase the karina. If the karina vowelise the georgena and the karina is lilac then the georgena is lawful. The georgena vowelise the karina.", "logic": "\nCool(georgena, karina)\nFantasize(georgena, karina)\nFantasize(karina, georgena)\nforall x (Mean(x) -> Cool(x, karina))\nforall x (Cool(x, georgena) -> Vowelise(georgena, karina))\nforall x (Vegetive(x) and Cool(x, karina) -> Cool(x, georgena))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, karina) -> Mean(x))\nVowelise(karina, georgena) and Cool(georgena, karina) -> Lilac(georgena)\nFantasize(georgena, karina) -> Cool(karina, georgena)\nforall x (Momentous(x) -> Cool(x, karina))\nVowelise(karina, georgena) and Lilac(karina) -> Lawful(georgena)\n\nVowelise(georgena, karina)\n\nFantasize(georgena, karina) and Fantasize(georgena, karina) -> Cool(karina, georgena) -> therefore Cool(karina, georgena) Cool(karina, georgena) and forall x (Cool(x, georgena) -> Vowelise(georgena, karina)) -> therefore Vowelise(georgena, karina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The cordula barbarize the delbert. The cordula peroxide the delbert. The delbert peroxide the cordula. If someone is airy then they chase the delbert. If someone barbarize the cordula then the cordula squelch the delbert. If someone is bigger and they chase the delbert then they chase the cordula. If someone squelch the delbert then they are airy. If the delbert squelch the cordula and the cordula barbarize the delbert then the cordula is hooved. If the cordula peroxide the delbert then the delbert barbarize the cordula. If someone is sure then they chase the delbert. If the delbert squelch the cordula and the delbert is hooved then the cordula is downhill. The cordula does not eat the delbert.", "logic": "\nBarbarize(cordula, delbert)\nPeroxide(cordula, delbert)\nPeroxide(delbert, cordula)\nforall x (Airy(x) -> Barbarize(x, delbert))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, cordula) -> Squelch(cordula, delbert))\nforall x (Bigger(x) and Barbarize(x, delbert) -> Barbarize(x, cordula))\nforall x (Squelch(x, delbert) -> Airy(x))\nSquelch(delbert, cordula) and Barbarize(cordula, delbert) -> Hooved(cordula)\nPeroxide(cordula, delbert) -> Barbarize(delbert, cordula)\nforall x (Sure(x) -> Barbarize(x, delbert))\nSquelch(delbert, cordula) and Hooved(delbert) -> Downhill(cordula)\n\nnot Squelch(cordula, delbert)\n\nPeroxide(cordula, delbert) and Peroxide(cordula, delbert) -> Barbarize(delbert, cordula) -> therefore Barbarize(delbert, cordula) Barbarize(delbert, cordula) and forall x (Barbarize(x, cordula) -> Squelch(cordula, delbert)) -> therefore Squelch(cordula, delbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The onlea commit the charmain. The onlea bowl the charmain. The charmain bowl the onlea. If someone is seamanlike then they chase the charmain. If someone commit the onlea then the onlea reactivate the charmain. If someone is smothered and they chase the charmain then they chase the onlea. If someone reactivate the charmain then they are seamanlike. If the charmain reactivate the onlea and the onlea commit the charmain then the onlea is crustacean. If the onlea bowl the charmain then the charmain commit the onlea. If someone is loathsome then they chase the charmain. If the charmain reactivate the onlea and the charmain is crustacean then the onlea is sanitary. The onlea is seamanlike.", "logic": "\nCommit(onlea, charmain)\nBowl(onlea, charmain)\nBowl(charmain, onlea)\nforall x (Seamanlike(x) -> Commit(x, charmain))\nforall x (Commit(x, onlea) -> Reactivate(onlea, charmain))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and Commit(x, charmain) -> Commit(x, onlea))\nforall x (Reactivate(x, charmain) -> Seamanlike(x))\nReactivate(charmain, onlea) and Commit(onlea, charmain) -> Crustacean(onlea)\nBowl(onlea, charmain) -> Commit(charmain, onlea)\nforall x (Loathsome(x) -> Commit(x, charmain))\nReactivate(charmain, onlea) and Crustacean(charmain) -> Sanitary(onlea)\n\nSeamanlike(onlea)\n\nBowl(onlea, charmain) and Bowl(onlea, charmain) -> Commit(charmain, onlea) -> therefore Commit(charmain, onlea) Commit(charmain, onlea) and forall x (Commit(x, onlea) -> Reactivate(onlea, charmain)) -> therefore Reactivate(onlea, charmain) Reactivate(onlea, charmain) and forall x (Reactivate(x, charmain) -> Seamanlike(x)) -> therefore Seamanlike(onlea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The doretta indulge the roxine. The doretta gazette the roxine. The roxine gazette the doretta. If someone is burled then they chase the roxine. If someone indulge the doretta then the doretta novelise the roxine. If someone is unfocused and they chase the roxine then they chase the doretta. If someone novelise the roxine then they are burled. If the roxine novelise the doretta and the doretta indulge the roxine then the doretta is capsulate. If the doretta gazette the roxine then the roxine indulge the doretta. If someone is ruffianly then they chase the roxine. If the roxine novelise the doretta and the roxine is capsulate then the doretta is regimented. The doretta is not burled.", "logic": "\nIndulge(doretta, roxine)\nGazette(doretta, roxine)\nGazette(roxine, doretta)\nforall x (Burled(x) -> Indulge(x, roxine))\nforall x (Indulge(x, doretta) -> Novelise(doretta, roxine))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Indulge(x, roxine) -> Indulge(x, doretta))\nforall x (Novelise(x, roxine) -> Burled(x))\nNovelise(roxine, doretta) and Indulge(doretta, roxine) -> Capsulate(doretta)\nGazette(doretta, roxine) -> Indulge(roxine, doretta)\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) -> Indulge(x, roxine))\nNovelise(roxine, doretta) and Capsulate(roxine) -> Regimented(doretta)\n\nnot Burled(doretta)\n\nGazette(doretta, roxine) and Gazette(doretta, roxine) -> Indulge(roxine, doretta) -> therefore Indulge(roxine, doretta) Indulge(roxine, doretta) and forall x (Indulge(x, doretta) -> Novelise(doretta, roxine)) -> therefore Novelise(doretta, roxine) Novelise(doretta, roxine) and forall x (Novelise(x, roxine) -> Burled(x)) -> therefore Burled(doretta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The sydney demise the simeon. The sydney revenge the simeon. The simeon revenge the sydney. If someone is antiknock then they chase the simeon. If someone demise the sydney then the sydney alight the simeon. If someone is ungainly and they chase the simeon then they chase the sydney. If someone alight the simeon then they are antiknock. If the simeon alight the sydney and the sydney demise the simeon then the sydney is dissilient. If the sydney revenge the simeon then the simeon demise the sydney. If someone is upbeat then they chase the simeon. If the simeon alight the sydney and the simeon is dissilient then the sydney is xanthous. The simeon is not antiknock.", "logic": "\nDemise(sydney, simeon)\nRevenge(sydney, simeon)\nRevenge(simeon, sydney)\nforall x (Antiknock(x) -> Demise(x, simeon))\nforall x (Demise(x, sydney) -> Alight(sydney, simeon))\nforall x (Ungainly(x) and Demise(x, simeon) -> Demise(x, sydney))\nforall x (Alight(x, simeon) -> Antiknock(x))\nAlight(simeon, sydney) and Demise(sydney, simeon) -> Dissilient(sydney)\nRevenge(sydney, simeon) -> Demise(simeon, sydney)\nforall x (Upbeat(x) -> Demise(x, simeon))\nAlight(simeon, sydney) and Dissilient(simeon) -> Xanthous(sydney)\n\nnot Antiknock(simeon)\n\nforall x (Alight(x, simeon) -> Antiknock(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The elisa spondaize the arlana. The elisa simulate the arlana. The arlana simulate the elisa. If someone is marshy then they chase the arlana. If someone spondaize the elisa then the elisa harm the arlana. If someone is ptolemaic and they chase the arlana then they chase the elisa. If someone harm the arlana then they are marshy. If the arlana harm the elisa and the elisa spondaize the arlana then the elisa is grudging. If the elisa simulate the arlana then the arlana spondaize the elisa. If someone is sliced then they chase the arlana. If the arlana harm the elisa and the arlana is grudging then the elisa is forked. The elisa is grudging.", "logic": "\nSpondaize(elisa, arlana)\nSimulate(elisa, arlana)\nSimulate(arlana, elisa)\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Spondaize(x, arlana))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, elisa) -> Harm(elisa, arlana))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Spondaize(x, arlana) -> Spondaize(x, elisa))\nforall x (Harm(x, arlana) -> Marshy(x))\nHarm(arlana, elisa) and Spondaize(elisa, arlana) -> Grudging(elisa)\nSimulate(elisa, arlana) -> Spondaize(arlana, elisa)\nforall x (Sliced(x) -> Spondaize(x, arlana))\nHarm(arlana, elisa) and Grudging(arlana) -> Forked(elisa)\n\nGrudging(elisa)\n\nHarm(arlana, elisa) and Spondaize(elisa, arlana) -> Grudging(elisa) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The margareta intersect the charmaine. The margareta tone the charmaine. The charmaine tone the margareta. If someone is solo then they chase the charmaine. If someone intersect the margareta then the margareta harbor the charmaine. If someone is hymenal and they chase the charmaine then they chase the margareta. If someone harbor the charmaine then they are solo. If the charmaine harbor the margareta and the margareta intersect the charmaine then the margareta is unsoured. If the margareta tone the charmaine then the charmaine intersect the margareta. If someone is cuboidal then they chase the charmaine. If the charmaine harbor the margareta and the charmaine is unsoured then the margareta is motherless. The margareta is not motherless.", "logic": "\nIntersect(margareta, charmaine)\nTone(margareta, charmaine)\nTone(charmaine, margareta)\nforall x (Solo(x) -> Intersect(x, charmaine))\nforall x (Intersect(x, margareta) -> Harbor(margareta, charmaine))\nforall x (Hymenal(x) and Intersect(x, charmaine) -> Intersect(x, margareta))\nforall x (Harbor(x, charmaine) -> Solo(x))\nHarbor(charmaine, margareta) and Intersect(margareta, charmaine) -> Unsoured(margareta)\nTone(margareta, charmaine) -> Intersect(charmaine, margareta)\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) -> Intersect(x, charmaine))\nHarbor(charmaine, margareta) and Unsoured(charmaine) -> Motherless(margareta)\n\nnot Motherless(margareta)\n\nHarbor(charmaine, margareta) and Unsoured(charmaine) -> Motherless(margareta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The kaila yield the chandler. The kaila goldplate the chandler. The chandler goldplate the kaila. If someone is deckled then they chase the chandler. If someone yield the kaila then the kaila crepitate the chandler. If someone is striped and they chase the chandler then they chase the kaila. If someone crepitate the chandler then they are deckled. If the chandler crepitate the kaila and the kaila yield the chandler then the kaila is dulled. If the kaila goldplate the chandler then the chandler yield the kaila. If someone is pretended then they chase the chandler. If the chandler crepitate the kaila and the chandler is dulled then the kaila is horrendous. The chandler yield the chandler.", "logic": "\nYield(kaila, chandler)\nGoldplate(kaila, chandler)\nGoldplate(chandler, kaila)\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Yield(x, chandler))\nforall x (Yield(x, kaila) -> Crepitate(kaila, chandler))\nforall x (Striped(x) and Yield(x, chandler) -> Yield(x, kaila))\nforall x (Crepitate(x, chandler) -> Deckled(x))\nCrepitate(chandler, kaila) and Yield(kaila, chandler) -> Dulled(kaila)\nGoldplate(kaila, chandler) -> Yield(chandler, kaila)\nforall x (Pretended(x) -> Yield(x, chandler))\nCrepitate(chandler, kaila) and Dulled(chandler) -> Horrendous(kaila)\n\nYield(chandler, chandler)\n\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Yield(x, chandler)) <- forall x (Crepitate(x, chandler) -> Deckled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The halette shadow the marsiella. The halette intuit the marsiella. The marsiella intuit the halette. If someone is reviving then they chase the marsiella. If someone shadow the halette then the halette stonewash the marsiella. If someone is woollen and they chase the marsiella then they chase the halette. If someone stonewash the marsiella then they are reviving. If the marsiella stonewash the halette and the halette shadow the marsiella then the halette is truncate. If the halette intuit the marsiella then the marsiella shadow the halette. If someone is contested then they chase the marsiella. If the marsiella stonewash the halette and the marsiella is truncate then the halette is rabid. The marsiella is not truncate.", "logic": "\nShadow(halette, marsiella)\nIntuit(halette, marsiella)\nIntuit(marsiella, halette)\nforall x (Reviving(x) -> Shadow(x, marsiella))\nforall x (Shadow(x, halette) -> Stonewash(halette, marsiella))\nforall x (Woollen(x) and Shadow(x, marsiella) -> Shadow(x, halette))\nforall x (Stonewash(x, marsiella) -> Reviving(x))\nStonewash(marsiella, halette) and Shadow(halette, marsiella) -> Truncate(halette)\nIntuit(halette, marsiella) -> Shadow(marsiella, halette)\nforall x (Contested(x) -> Shadow(x, marsiella))\nStonewash(marsiella, halette) and Truncate(marsiella) -> Rabid(halette)\n\nnot Truncate(marsiella)\n\nnot Truncate(marsiella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The wilhelm cleanse the meriel. The wilhelm overhaul the meriel. The meriel overhaul the wilhelm. If someone is autotypic then they chase the meriel. If someone cleanse the wilhelm then the wilhelm snail the meriel. If someone is hearsay and they chase the meriel then they chase the wilhelm. If someone snail the meriel then they are autotypic. If the meriel snail the wilhelm and the wilhelm cleanse the meriel then the wilhelm is endogamous. If the wilhelm overhaul the meriel then the meriel cleanse the wilhelm. If someone is zealous then they chase the meriel. If the meriel snail the wilhelm and the meriel is endogamous then the wilhelm is misty. The wilhelm snail the wilhelm.", "logic": "\nCleanse(wilhelm, meriel)\nOverhaul(wilhelm, meriel)\nOverhaul(meriel, wilhelm)\nforall x (Autotypic(x) -> Cleanse(x, meriel))\nforall x (Cleanse(x, wilhelm) -> Snail(wilhelm, meriel))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) and Cleanse(x, meriel) -> Cleanse(x, wilhelm))\nforall x (Snail(x, meriel) -> Autotypic(x))\nSnail(meriel, wilhelm) and Cleanse(wilhelm, meriel) -> Endogamous(wilhelm)\nOverhaul(wilhelm, meriel) -> Cleanse(meriel, wilhelm)\nforall x (Zealous(x) -> Cleanse(x, meriel))\nSnail(meriel, wilhelm) and Endogamous(meriel) -> Misty(wilhelm)\n\nSnail(wilhelm, wilhelm)\n\nSnail(wilhelm, wilhelm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The townsend fowl the lorelei. The townsend swosh the lorelei. The lorelei swosh the townsend. If someone is decayable then they chase the lorelei. If someone fowl the townsend then the townsend sheathe the lorelei. If someone is thawed and they chase the lorelei then they chase the townsend. If someone sheathe the lorelei then they are decayable. If the lorelei sheathe the townsend and the townsend fowl the lorelei then the townsend is flaming. If the townsend swosh the lorelei then the lorelei fowl the townsend. If someone is sensory then they chase the lorelei. If the lorelei sheathe the townsend and the lorelei is flaming then the townsend is rivalrous. The townsend does not need the townsend.", "logic": "\nFowl(townsend, lorelei)\nSwosh(townsend, lorelei)\nSwosh(lorelei, townsend)\nforall x (Decayable(x) -> Fowl(x, lorelei))\nforall x (Fowl(x, townsend) -> Sheathe(townsend, lorelei))\nforall x (Thawed(x) and Fowl(x, lorelei) -> Fowl(x, townsend))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, lorelei) -> Decayable(x))\nSheathe(lorelei, townsend) and Fowl(townsend, lorelei) -> Flaming(townsend)\nSwosh(townsend, lorelei) -> Fowl(lorelei, townsend)\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Fowl(x, lorelei))\nSheathe(lorelei, townsend) and Flaming(lorelei) -> Rivalrous(townsend)\n\nnot Swosh(townsend, townsend)\n\nnot Swosh(townsend, townsend) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The brena didder the emory. The brena probate the emory. The emory probate the brena. If someone is advised then they chase the emory. If someone didder the brena then the brena instance the emory. If someone is calloused and they chase the emory then they chase the brena. If someone instance the emory then they are advised. If the emory instance the brena and the brena didder the emory then the brena is unsent. If the brena probate the emory then the emory didder the brena. If someone is burning then they chase the emory. If the emory instance the brena and the emory is unsent then the brena is polemical. The emory is calloused.", "logic": "\nDidder(brena, emory)\nProbate(brena, emory)\nProbate(emory, brena)\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Didder(x, emory))\nforall x (Didder(x, brena) -> Instance(brena, emory))\nforall x (Calloused(x) and Didder(x, emory) -> Didder(x, brena))\nforall x (Instance(x, emory) -> Advised(x))\nInstance(emory, brena) and Didder(brena, emory) -> Unsent(brena)\nProbate(brena, emory) -> Didder(emory, brena)\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Didder(x, emory))\nInstance(emory, brena) and Unsent(emory) -> Polemical(brena)\n\nCalloused(emory)\n\nCalloused(emory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The ichabod trigger the celie. The ichabod link the celie. The ave is coalescing. The ave pooch the ichabod. The ave trigger the celie. The ave link the celie. The celie is cuneate. The celie pooch the ave. The celie trigger the ichabod. The celie link the ichabod. If the ichabod is cuneate and the ichabod trigger the celie then the celie trigger the ave. If the ave link the celie and the ave pooch the celie then the ave is trenchant. If the ichabod pooch the ave then the ave link the celie. If someone pooch the celie then they see the ave. If someone trigger the ichabod and they visit the ave then the ichabod trigger the ave. If someone pooch the ave and the ave trigger the celie then the ave is cuneate. If someone is trenchant and they visit the ichabod then the ichabod is cuneate. All cuneate people are trenchant. The ave is coalescing.", "logic": "\nTrigger(ichabod, celie)\nLink(ichabod, celie)\nCoalescing(ave)\nPooch(ave, ichabod)\nTrigger(ave, celie)\nLink(ave, celie)\nCuneate(celie)\nPooch(celie, ave)\nTrigger(celie, ichabod)\nLink(celie, ichabod)\nCuneate(ichabod) and Trigger(ichabod, celie) -> Trigger(celie, ave)\nLink(ave, celie) and Pooch(ave, celie) -> Trenchant(ave)\nPooch(ichabod, ave) -> Link(ave, celie)\nforall x (Pooch(x, celie) -> Trigger(x, ave))\nforall x (Trigger(x, ichabod) and Link(x, ave) -> Trigger(ichabod, ave))\nforall x (Pooch(x, ave) and Trigger(ave, celie) -> Cuneate(ave))\nforall x (Trenchant(x) and Link(x, ichabod) -> Cuneate(ichabod))\nforall x (Cuneate(x) -> Trenchant(x))\n\nCoalescing(ave)\n\ntherefore Coalescing(ave)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The stanislaw thin the ransom. The stanislaw banquet the ransom. The nathalia is shredded. The nathalia toady the stanislaw. The nathalia thin the ransom. The nathalia banquet the ransom. The ransom is insistent. The ransom toady the nathalia. The ransom thin the stanislaw. The ransom banquet the stanislaw. If the stanislaw is insistent and the stanislaw thin the ransom then the ransom thin the nathalia. If the nathalia banquet the ransom and the nathalia toady the ransom then the nathalia is fraudulent. If the stanislaw toady the nathalia then the nathalia banquet the ransom. If someone toady the ransom then they see the nathalia. If someone thin the stanislaw and they visit the nathalia then the stanislaw thin the nathalia. If someone toady the nathalia and the nathalia thin the ransom then the nathalia is insistent. If someone is fraudulent and they visit the stanislaw then the stanislaw is insistent. All insistent people are fraudulent. The ransom does not visit the stanislaw.", "logic": "\nThin(stanislaw, ransom)\nBanquet(stanislaw, ransom)\nShredded(nathalia)\nToady(nathalia, stanislaw)\nThin(nathalia, ransom)\nBanquet(nathalia, ransom)\nInsistent(ransom)\nToady(ransom, nathalia)\nThin(ransom, stanislaw)\nBanquet(ransom, stanislaw)\nInsistent(stanislaw) and Thin(stanislaw, ransom) -> Thin(ransom, nathalia)\nBanquet(nathalia, ransom) and Toady(nathalia, ransom) -> Fraudulent(nathalia)\nToady(stanislaw, nathalia) -> Banquet(nathalia, ransom)\nforall x (Toady(x, ransom) -> Thin(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Thin(x, stanislaw) and Banquet(x, nathalia) -> Thin(stanislaw, nathalia))\nforall x (Toady(x, nathalia) and Thin(nathalia, ransom) -> Insistent(nathalia))\nforall x (Fraudulent(x) and Banquet(x, stanislaw) -> Insistent(stanislaw))\nforall x (Insistent(x) -> Fraudulent(x))\n\nnot Banquet(ransom, stanislaw)\n\ntherefore Banquet(ransom, stanislaw)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The nonna harry the cherey. The nonna funk the cherey. The sydelle is nightlong. The sydelle enthrone the nonna. The sydelle harry the cherey. The sydelle funk the cherey. The cherey is mortgaged. The cherey enthrone the sydelle. The cherey harry the nonna. The cherey funk the nonna. If the nonna is mortgaged and the nonna harry the cherey then the cherey harry the sydelle. If the sydelle funk the cherey and the sydelle enthrone the cherey then the sydelle is cumuliform. If the nonna enthrone the sydelle then the sydelle funk the cherey. If someone enthrone the cherey then they see the sydelle. If someone harry the nonna and they visit the sydelle then the nonna harry the sydelle. If someone enthrone the sydelle and the sydelle harry the cherey then the sydelle is mortgaged. If someone is cumuliform and they visit the nonna then the nonna is mortgaged. All mortgaged people are cumuliform. The sydelle is mortgaged.", "logic": "\nHarry(nonna, cherey)\nFunk(nonna, cherey)\nNightlong(sydelle)\nEnthrone(sydelle, nonna)\nHarry(sydelle, cherey)\nFunk(sydelle, cherey)\nMortgaged(cherey)\nEnthrone(cherey, sydelle)\nHarry(cherey, nonna)\nFunk(cherey, nonna)\nMortgaged(nonna) and Harry(nonna, cherey) -> Harry(cherey, sydelle)\nFunk(sydelle, cherey) and Enthrone(sydelle, cherey) -> Cumuliform(sydelle)\nEnthrone(nonna, sydelle) -> Funk(sydelle, cherey)\nforall x (Enthrone(x, cherey) -> Harry(x, sydelle))\nforall x (Harry(x, nonna) and Funk(x, sydelle) -> Harry(nonna, sydelle))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, sydelle) and Harry(sydelle, cherey) -> Mortgaged(sydelle))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) and Funk(x, nonna) -> Mortgaged(nonna))\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Cumuliform(x))\n\nMortgaged(sydelle)\n\nEnthrone(cherey, sydelle) and Harry(sydelle, cherey) and forall x (Enthrone(x, sydelle) and Harry(sydelle, cherey) -> Mortgaged(sydelle)) -> therefore Mortgaged(sydelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The meir appertain the ardath. The meir shush the ardath. The daffy is stormproof. The daffy hurry the meir. The daffy appertain the ardath. The daffy shush the ardath. The ardath is meritless. The ardath hurry the daffy. The ardath appertain the meir. The ardath shush the meir. If the meir is meritless and the meir appertain the ardath then the ardath appertain the daffy. If the daffy shush the ardath and the daffy hurry the ardath then the daffy is mucose. If the meir hurry the daffy then the daffy shush the ardath. If someone hurry the ardath then they see the daffy. If someone appertain the meir and they visit the daffy then the meir appertain the daffy. If someone hurry the daffy and the daffy appertain the ardath then the daffy is meritless. If someone is mucose and they visit the meir then the meir is meritless. All meritless people are mucose. The ardath is not mucose.", "logic": "\nAppertain(meir, ardath)\nShush(meir, ardath)\nStormproof(daffy)\nHurry(daffy, meir)\nAppertain(daffy, ardath)\nShush(daffy, ardath)\nMeritless(ardath)\nHurry(ardath, daffy)\nAppertain(ardath, meir)\nShush(ardath, meir)\nMeritless(meir) and Appertain(meir, ardath) -> Appertain(ardath, daffy)\nShush(daffy, ardath) and Hurry(daffy, ardath) -> Mucose(daffy)\nHurry(meir, daffy) -> Shush(daffy, ardath)\nforall x (Hurry(x, ardath) -> Appertain(x, daffy))\nforall x (Appertain(x, meir) and Shush(x, daffy) -> Appertain(meir, daffy))\nforall x (Hurry(x, daffy) and Appertain(daffy, ardath) -> Meritless(daffy))\nforall x (Mucose(x) and Shush(x, meir) -> Meritless(meir))\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Mucose(x))\n\nnot Mucose(ardath)\n\nMeritless(ardath) and forall x (Meritless(x) -> Mucose(x)) -> therefore Mucose(ardath)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The zabrina loll the catina. The zabrina stale the catina. The otes is well. The otes enwrap the zabrina. The otes loll the catina. The otes stale the catina. The catina is assumptive. The catina enwrap the otes. The catina loll the zabrina. The catina stale the zabrina. If the zabrina is assumptive and the zabrina loll the catina then the catina loll the otes. If the otes stale the catina and the otes enwrap the catina then the otes is westmost. If the zabrina enwrap the otes then the otes stale the catina. If someone enwrap the catina then they see the otes. If someone loll the zabrina and they visit the otes then the zabrina loll the otes. If someone enwrap the otes and the otes loll the catina then the otes is assumptive. If someone is westmost and they visit the zabrina then the zabrina is assumptive. All assumptive people are westmost. The zabrina is assumptive.", "logic": "\nLoll(zabrina, catina)\nStale(zabrina, catina)\nWell(otes)\nEnwrap(otes, zabrina)\nLoll(otes, catina)\nStale(otes, catina)\nAssumptive(catina)\nEnwrap(catina, otes)\nLoll(catina, zabrina)\nStale(catina, zabrina)\nAssumptive(zabrina) and Loll(zabrina, catina) -> Loll(catina, otes)\nStale(otes, catina) and Enwrap(otes, catina) -> Westmost(otes)\nEnwrap(zabrina, otes) -> Stale(otes, catina)\nforall x (Enwrap(x, catina) -> Loll(x, otes))\nforall x (Loll(x, zabrina) and Stale(x, otes) -> Loll(zabrina, otes))\nforall x (Enwrap(x, otes) and Loll(otes, catina) -> Assumptive(otes))\nforall x (Westmost(x) and Stale(x, zabrina) -> Assumptive(zabrina))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) -> Westmost(x))\n\nAssumptive(zabrina)\n\nAssumptive(catina) and forall x (Assumptive(x) -> Westmost(x)) -> therefore Westmost(catina) Westmost(catina) and Stale(catina, zabrina) and forall x (Westmost(x) and Stale(x, zabrina) -> Assumptive(zabrina)) -> therefore Assumptive(zabrina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The arie quail the una. The arie optimise the una. The joella is stellar. The joella masturbate the arie. The joella quail the una. The joella optimise the una. The una is settled. The una masturbate the joella. The una quail the arie. The una optimise the arie. If the arie is settled and the arie quail the una then the una quail the joella. If the joella optimise the una and the joella masturbate the una then the joella is sibyllic. If the arie masturbate the joella then the joella optimise the una. If someone masturbate the una then they see the joella. If someone quail the arie and they visit the joella then the arie quail the joella. If someone masturbate the joella and the joella quail the una then the joella is settled. If someone is sibyllic and they visit the arie then the arie is settled. All settled people are sibyllic. The arie is not settled.", "logic": "\nQuail(arie, una)\nOptimise(arie, una)\nStellar(joella)\nMasturbate(joella, arie)\nQuail(joella, una)\nOptimise(joella, una)\nSettled(una)\nMasturbate(una, joella)\nQuail(una, arie)\nOptimise(una, arie)\nSettled(arie) and Quail(arie, una) -> Quail(una, joella)\nOptimise(joella, una) and Masturbate(joella, una) -> Sibyllic(joella)\nMasturbate(arie, joella) -> Optimise(joella, una)\nforall x (Masturbate(x, una) -> Quail(x, joella))\nforall x (Quail(x, arie) and Optimise(x, joella) -> Quail(arie, joella))\nforall x (Masturbate(x, joella) and Quail(joella, una) -> Settled(joella))\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) and Optimise(x, arie) -> Settled(arie))\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Sibyllic(x))\n\nnot Settled(arie)\n\nSettled(una) and forall x (Settled(x) -> Sibyllic(x)) -> therefore Sibyllic(una) Sibyllic(una) and Optimise(una, arie) and forall x (Sibyllic(x) and Optimise(x, arie) -> Settled(arie)) -> therefore Settled(arie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The virginia recognise the temp. The virginia ladle the temp. The denyse is solomonic. The denyse cull the virginia. The denyse recognise the temp. The denyse ladle the temp. The temp is archaistic. The temp cull the denyse. The temp recognise the virginia. The temp ladle the virginia. If the virginia is archaistic and the virginia recognise the temp then the temp recognise the denyse. If the denyse ladle the temp and the denyse cull the temp then the denyse is ossified. If the virginia cull the denyse then the denyse ladle the temp. If someone cull the temp then they see the denyse. If someone recognise the virginia and they visit the denyse then the virginia recognise the denyse. If someone cull the denyse and the denyse recognise the temp then the denyse is archaistic. If someone is ossified and they visit the virginia then the virginia is archaistic. All archaistic people are ossified. The virginia is ossified.", "logic": "\nRecognise(virginia, temp)\nLadle(virginia, temp)\nSolomonic(denyse)\nCull(denyse, virginia)\nRecognise(denyse, temp)\nLadle(denyse, temp)\nArchaistic(temp)\nCull(temp, denyse)\nRecognise(temp, virginia)\nLadle(temp, virginia)\nArchaistic(virginia) and Recognise(virginia, temp) -> Recognise(temp, denyse)\nLadle(denyse, temp) and Cull(denyse, temp) -> Ossified(denyse)\nCull(virginia, denyse) -> Ladle(denyse, temp)\nforall x (Cull(x, temp) -> Recognise(x, denyse))\nforall x (Recognise(x, virginia) and Ladle(x, denyse) -> Recognise(virginia, denyse))\nforall x (Cull(x, denyse) and Recognise(denyse, temp) -> Archaistic(denyse))\nforall x (Ossified(x) and Ladle(x, virginia) -> Archaistic(virginia))\nforall x (Archaistic(x) -> Ossified(x))\n\nOssified(virginia)\n\nArchaistic(temp) and forall x (Archaistic(x) -> Ossified(x)) -> therefore Ossified(temp) Ossified(temp) and Ladle(temp, virginia) and forall x (Ossified(x) and Ladle(x, virginia) -> Archaistic(virginia)) -> therefore Archaistic(virginia) Archaistic(virginia) and forall x (Archaistic(x) -> Ossified(x)) -> therefore Ossified(virginia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The bobbie heighten the stanley. The bobbie visa the stanley. The austine is unmilitary. The austine macadamize the bobbie. The austine heighten the stanley. The austine visa the stanley. The stanley is bothered. The stanley macadamize the austine. The stanley heighten the bobbie. The stanley visa the bobbie. If the bobbie is bothered and the bobbie heighten the stanley then the stanley heighten the austine. If the austine visa the stanley and the austine macadamize the stanley then the austine is undefined. If the bobbie macadamize the austine then the austine visa the stanley. If someone macadamize the stanley then they see the austine. If someone heighten the bobbie and they visit the austine then the bobbie heighten the austine. If someone macadamize the austine and the austine heighten the stanley then the austine is bothered. If someone is undefined and they visit the bobbie then the bobbie is bothered. All bothered people are undefined. The stanley does not see the austine.", "logic": "\nHeighten(bobbie, stanley)\nVisa(bobbie, stanley)\nUnmilitary(austine)\nMacadamize(austine, bobbie)\nHeighten(austine, stanley)\nVisa(austine, stanley)\nBothered(stanley)\nMacadamize(stanley, austine)\nHeighten(stanley, bobbie)\nVisa(stanley, bobbie)\nBothered(bobbie) and Heighten(bobbie, stanley) -> Heighten(stanley, austine)\nVisa(austine, stanley) and Macadamize(austine, stanley) -> Undefined(austine)\nMacadamize(bobbie, austine) -> Visa(austine, stanley)\nforall x (Macadamize(x, stanley) -> Heighten(x, austine))\nforall x (Heighten(x, bobbie) and Visa(x, austine) -> Heighten(bobbie, austine))\nforall x (Macadamize(x, austine) and Heighten(austine, stanley) -> Bothered(austine))\nforall x (Undefined(x) and Visa(x, bobbie) -> Bothered(bobbie))\nforall x (Bothered(x) -> Undefined(x))\n\nnot Heighten(stanley, austine)\n\nBothered(stanley) and forall x (Bothered(x) -> Undefined(x)) -> therefore Undefined(stanley) Undefined(stanley) and Visa(stanley, bobbie) and forall x (Undefined(x) and Visa(x, bobbie) -> Bothered(bobbie)) -> therefore Bothered(bobbie) Bothered(bobbie) and Heighten(bobbie, stanley) and Bothered(bobbie) and Heighten(bobbie, stanley) -> Heighten(stanley, austine) -> therefore Heighten(stanley, austine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The gera scalp the caryn. The gera impound the caryn. The hali is scaly. The hali parlay the gera. The hali scalp the caryn. The hali impound the caryn. The caryn is inpouring. The caryn parlay the hali. The caryn scalp the gera. The caryn impound the gera. If the gera is inpouring and the gera scalp the caryn then the caryn scalp the hali. If the hali impound the caryn and the hali parlay the caryn then the hali is unusual. If the gera parlay the hali then the hali impound the caryn. If someone parlay the caryn then they see the hali. If someone scalp the gera and they visit the hali then the gera scalp the hali. If someone parlay the hali and the hali scalp the caryn then the hali is inpouring. If someone is unusual and they visit the gera then the gera is inpouring. All inpouring people are unusual. The gera does not see the hali.", "logic": "\nScalp(gera, caryn)\nImpound(gera, caryn)\nScaly(hali)\nParlay(hali, gera)\nScalp(hali, caryn)\nImpound(hali, caryn)\nInpouring(caryn)\nParlay(caryn, hali)\nScalp(caryn, gera)\nImpound(caryn, gera)\nInpouring(gera) and Scalp(gera, caryn) -> Scalp(caryn, hali)\nImpound(hali, caryn) and Parlay(hali, caryn) -> Unusual(hali)\nParlay(gera, hali) -> Impound(hali, caryn)\nforall x (Parlay(x, caryn) -> Scalp(x, hali))\nforall x (Scalp(x, gera) and Impound(x, hali) -> Scalp(gera, hali))\nforall x (Parlay(x, hali) and Scalp(hali, caryn) -> Inpouring(hali))\nforall x (Unusual(x) and Impound(x, gera) -> Inpouring(gera))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) -> Unusual(x))\n\nnot Scalp(gera, hali)\n\nforall x (Parlay(x, caryn) -> Scalp(x, hali)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The trip burnish the waring. The trip complement the waring. The tawsha is morbid. The tawsha abacinate the trip. The tawsha burnish the waring. The tawsha complement the waring. The waring is egoistical. The waring abacinate the tawsha. The waring burnish the trip. The waring complement the trip. If the trip is egoistical and the trip burnish the waring then the waring burnish the tawsha. If the tawsha complement the waring and the tawsha abacinate the waring then the tawsha is forfeited. If the trip abacinate the tawsha then the tawsha complement the waring. If someone abacinate the waring then they see the tawsha. If someone burnish the trip and they visit the tawsha then the trip burnish the tawsha. If someone abacinate the tawsha and the tawsha burnish the waring then the tawsha is egoistical. If someone is forfeited and they visit the trip then the trip is egoistical. All egoistical people are forfeited. The tawsha burnish the tawsha.", "logic": "\nBurnish(trip, waring)\nComplement(trip, waring)\nMorbid(tawsha)\nAbacinate(tawsha, trip)\nBurnish(tawsha, waring)\nComplement(tawsha, waring)\nEgoistical(waring)\nAbacinate(waring, tawsha)\nBurnish(waring, trip)\nComplement(waring, trip)\nEgoistical(trip) and Burnish(trip, waring) -> Burnish(waring, tawsha)\nComplement(tawsha, waring) and Abacinate(tawsha, waring) -> Forfeited(tawsha)\nAbacinate(trip, tawsha) -> Complement(tawsha, waring)\nforall x (Abacinate(x, waring) -> Burnish(x, tawsha))\nforall x (Burnish(x, trip) and Complement(x, tawsha) -> Burnish(trip, tawsha))\nforall x (Abacinate(x, tawsha) and Burnish(tawsha, waring) -> Egoistical(tawsha))\nforall x (Forfeited(x) and Complement(x, trip) -> Egoistical(trip))\nforall x (Egoistical(x) -> Forfeited(x))\n\nBurnish(tawsha, tawsha)\n\nforall x (Abacinate(x, waring) -> Burnish(x, tawsha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The maison whirlpool the ronni. The maison cluster the ronni. The rozella is tripartite. The rozella becalm the maison. The rozella whirlpool the ronni. The rozella cluster the ronni. The ronni is shady. The ronni becalm the rozella. The ronni whirlpool the maison. The ronni cluster the maison. If the maison is shady and the maison whirlpool the ronni then the ronni whirlpool the rozella. If the rozella cluster the ronni and the rozella becalm the ronni then the rozella is subclavian. If the maison becalm the rozella then the rozella cluster the ronni. If someone becalm the ronni then they see the rozella. If someone whirlpool the maison and they visit the rozella then the maison whirlpool the rozella. If someone becalm the rozella and the rozella whirlpool the ronni then the rozella is shady. If someone is subclavian and they visit the maison then the maison is shady. All shady people are subclavian. The maison does not see the maison.", "logic": "\nWhirlpool(maison, ronni)\nCluster(maison, ronni)\nTripartite(rozella)\nBecalm(rozella, maison)\nWhirlpool(rozella, ronni)\nCluster(rozella, ronni)\nShady(ronni)\nBecalm(ronni, rozella)\nWhirlpool(ronni, maison)\nCluster(ronni, maison)\nShady(maison) and Whirlpool(maison, ronni) -> Whirlpool(ronni, rozella)\nCluster(rozella, ronni) and Becalm(rozella, ronni) -> Subclavian(rozella)\nBecalm(maison, rozella) -> Cluster(rozella, ronni)\nforall x (Becalm(x, ronni) -> Whirlpool(x, rozella))\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, maison) and Cluster(x, rozella) -> Whirlpool(maison, rozella))\nforall x (Becalm(x, rozella) and Whirlpool(rozella, ronni) -> Shady(rozella))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) and Cluster(x, maison) -> Shady(maison))\nforall x (Shady(x) -> Subclavian(x))\n\nnot Whirlpool(maison, maison)\n\nnot Whirlpool(maison, maison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The barbra debrief the magdaia. The barbra invoke the magdaia. The alexis is siberian. The alexis cerebrate the barbra. The alexis debrief the magdaia. The alexis invoke the magdaia. The magdaia is czaristic. The magdaia cerebrate the alexis. The magdaia debrief the barbra. The magdaia invoke the barbra. If the barbra is czaristic and the barbra debrief the magdaia then the magdaia debrief the alexis. If the alexis invoke the magdaia and the alexis cerebrate the magdaia then the alexis is perverse. If the barbra cerebrate the alexis then the alexis invoke the magdaia. If someone cerebrate the magdaia then they see the alexis. If someone debrief the barbra and they visit the alexis then the barbra debrief the alexis. If someone cerebrate the alexis and the alexis debrief the magdaia then the alexis is czaristic. If someone is perverse and they visit the barbra then the barbra is czaristic. All czaristic people are perverse. The magdaia is siberian.", "logic": "\nDebrief(barbra, magdaia)\nInvoke(barbra, magdaia)\nSiberian(alexis)\nCerebrate(alexis, barbra)\nDebrief(alexis, magdaia)\nInvoke(alexis, magdaia)\nCzaristic(magdaia)\nCerebrate(magdaia, alexis)\nDebrief(magdaia, barbra)\nInvoke(magdaia, barbra)\nCzaristic(barbra) and Debrief(barbra, magdaia) -> Debrief(magdaia, alexis)\nInvoke(alexis, magdaia) and Cerebrate(alexis, magdaia) -> Perverse(alexis)\nCerebrate(barbra, alexis) -> Invoke(alexis, magdaia)\nforall x (Cerebrate(x, magdaia) -> Debrief(x, alexis))\nforall x (Debrief(x, barbra) and Invoke(x, alexis) -> Debrief(barbra, alexis))\nforall x (Cerebrate(x, alexis) and Debrief(alexis, magdaia) -> Czaristic(alexis))\nforall x (Perverse(x) and Invoke(x, barbra) -> Czaristic(barbra))\nforall x (Czaristic(x) -> Perverse(x))\n\nSiberian(magdaia)\n\nSiberian(magdaia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The rosemarie speechify the roda. The rosemarie nosh the roda. The bee is swayback. The bee rouse the rosemarie. The bee speechify the roda. The bee nosh the roda. The roda is semihard. The roda rouse the bee. The roda speechify the rosemarie. The roda nosh the rosemarie. If the rosemarie is semihard and the rosemarie speechify the roda then the roda speechify the bee. If the bee nosh the roda and the bee rouse the roda then the bee is wondrous. If the rosemarie rouse the bee then the bee nosh the roda. If someone rouse the roda then they see the bee. If someone speechify the rosemarie and they visit the bee then the rosemarie speechify the bee. If someone rouse the bee and the bee speechify the roda then the bee is semihard. If someone is wondrous and they visit the rosemarie then the rosemarie is semihard. All semihard people are wondrous. The roda does not need the rosemarie.", "logic": "\nSpeechify(rosemarie, roda)\nNosh(rosemarie, roda)\nSwayback(bee)\nRouse(bee, rosemarie)\nSpeechify(bee, roda)\nNosh(bee, roda)\nSemihard(roda)\nRouse(roda, bee)\nSpeechify(roda, rosemarie)\nNosh(roda, rosemarie)\nSemihard(rosemarie) and Speechify(rosemarie, roda) -> Speechify(roda, bee)\nNosh(bee, roda) and Rouse(bee, roda) -> Wondrous(bee)\nRouse(rosemarie, bee) -> Nosh(bee, roda)\nforall x (Rouse(x, roda) -> Speechify(x, bee))\nforall x (Speechify(x, rosemarie) and Nosh(x, bee) -> Speechify(rosemarie, bee))\nforall x (Rouse(x, bee) and Speechify(bee, roda) -> Semihard(bee))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) and Nosh(x, rosemarie) -> Semihard(rosemarie))\nforall x (Semihard(x) -> Wondrous(x))\n\nnot Rouse(roda, rosemarie)\n\nnot Rouse(roda, rosemarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The nollie clop the ranna. The nollie clone the ranna. The roze is ungrateful. The roze gibber the nollie. The roze clop the ranna. The roze clone the ranna. The ranna is colorfast. The ranna gibber the roze. The ranna clop the nollie. The ranna clone the nollie. If the nollie is colorfast and the nollie clop the ranna then the ranna clop the roze. If the roze clone the ranna and the roze gibber the ranna then the roze is riled. If the nollie gibber the roze then the roze clone the ranna. If someone gibber the ranna then they see the roze. If someone clop the nollie and they visit the roze then the nollie clop the roze. If someone gibber the roze and the roze clop the ranna then the roze is colorfast. If someone is riled and they visit the nollie then the nollie is colorfast. All colorfast people are riled. The ranna is blue.", "logic": "\nClop(nollie, ranna)\nClone(nollie, ranna)\nUngrateful(roze)\nGibber(roze, nollie)\nClop(roze, ranna)\nClone(roze, ranna)\nColorfast(ranna)\nGibber(ranna, roze)\nClop(ranna, nollie)\nClone(ranna, nollie)\nColorfast(nollie) and Clop(nollie, ranna) -> Clop(ranna, roze)\nClone(roze, ranna) and Gibber(roze, ranna) -> Riled(roze)\nGibber(nollie, roze) -> Clone(roze, ranna)\nforall x (Gibber(x, ranna) -> Clop(x, roze))\nforall x (Clop(x, nollie) and Clone(x, roze) -> Clop(nollie, roze))\nforall x (Gibber(x, roze) and Clop(roze, ranna) -> Colorfast(roze))\nforall x (Riled(x) and Clone(x, nollie) -> Colorfast(nollie))\nforall x (Colorfast(x) -> Riled(x))\n\nBlue(ranna)\n\nBlue(ranna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The trix abolish the phineas. The trix collide the phineas. The kristel is bulbaceous. The kristel imagine the trix. The kristel abolish the phineas. The kristel collide the phineas. The phineas is semiformal. The phineas imagine the kristel. The phineas abolish the trix. The phineas collide the trix. If the trix is semiformal and the trix abolish the phineas then the phineas abolish the kristel. If the kristel collide the phineas and the kristel imagine the phineas then the kristel is inflatable. If the trix imagine the kristel then the kristel collide the phineas. If someone imagine the phineas then they see the kristel. If someone abolish the trix and they visit the kristel then the trix abolish the kristel. If someone imagine the kristel and the kristel abolish the phineas then the kristel is semiformal. If someone is inflatable and they visit the trix then the trix is semiformal. All semiformal people are inflatable. The trix is not rough.", "logic": "\nAbolish(trix, phineas)\nCollide(trix, phineas)\nBulbaceous(kristel)\nImagine(kristel, trix)\nAbolish(kristel, phineas)\nCollide(kristel, phineas)\nSemiformal(phineas)\nImagine(phineas, kristel)\nAbolish(phineas, trix)\nCollide(phineas, trix)\nSemiformal(trix) and Abolish(trix, phineas) -> Abolish(phineas, kristel)\nCollide(kristel, phineas) and Imagine(kristel, phineas) -> Inflatable(kristel)\nImagine(trix, kristel) -> Collide(kristel, phineas)\nforall x (Imagine(x, phineas) -> Abolish(x, kristel))\nforall x (Abolish(x, trix) and Collide(x, kristel) -> Abolish(trix, kristel))\nforall x (Imagine(x, kristel) and Abolish(kristel, phineas) -> Semiformal(kristel))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) and Collide(x, trix) -> Semiformal(trix))\nforall x (Semiformal(x) -> Inflatable(x))\n\nnot Rough(trix)\n\nnot Rough(trix) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The lona wreathe the nessa. The lona grill the nessa. The margaux is dormant. The margaux monkey the lona. The margaux wreathe the nessa. The margaux grill the nessa. The nessa is addable. The nessa monkey the margaux. The nessa wreathe the lona. The nessa grill the lona. If the lona is addable and the lona wreathe the nessa then the nessa wreathe the margaux. If the margaux grill the nessa and the margaux monkey the nessa then the margaux is taupe. If the lona monkey the margaux then the margaux grill the nessa. If someone monkey the nessa then they see the margaux. If someone wreathe the lona and they visit the margaux then the lona wreathe the margaux. If someone monkey the margaux and the margaux wreathe the nessa then the margaux is addable. If someone is taupe and they visit the lona then the lona is addable. All addable people are taupe. The lona is dormant.", "logic": "\nWreathe(lona, nessa)\nGrill(lona, nessa)\nDormant(margaux)\nMonkey(margaux, lona)\nWreathe(margaux, nessa)\nGrill(margaux, nessa)\nAddable(nessa)\nMonkey(nessa, margaux)\nWreathe(nessa, lona)\nGrill(nessa, lona)\nAddable(lona) and Wreathe(lona, nessa) -> Wreathe(nessa, margaux)\nGrill(margaux, nessa) and Monkey(margaux, nessa) -> Taupe(margaux)\nMonkey(lona, margaux) -> Grill(margaux, nessa)\nforall x (Monkey(x, nessa) -> Wreathe(x, margaux))\nforall x (Wreathe(x, lona) and Grill(x, margaux) -> Wreathe(lona, margaux))\nforall x (Monkey(x, margaux) and Wreathe(margaux, nessa) -> Addable(margaux))\nforall x (Taupe(x) and Grill(x, lona) -> Addable(lona))\nforall x (Addable(x) -> Taupe(x))\n\nDormant(lona)\n\nDormant(lona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "Farand is exchanged. Farand is unsafe. Fawn is nude. Fawn is lacking. Kamila is usurious. Henryetta is ungrateful. Henryetta is lacking. If Kamila is usurious then Kamila is unsafe. Young things are exchanged. Red, lacking things are jacobean. All exchanged things are unsafe. If something is unsafe and lacking then it is ungrateful. Young things are jacobean. Farand is unsafe.", "logic": "\nExchanged(farand)\nUnsafe(farand)\nNude(fawn)\nLacking(fawn)\nUsurious(kamila)\nUngrateful(henryetta)\nLacking(henryetta)\nUsurious(kamila) -> Unsafe(kamila)\nforall x (Lacking(x) -> Exchanged(x))\nforall x (Unsafe(x) and Lacking(x) -> Jacobean(x))\nforall x (Exchanged(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nforall x (Unsafe(x) and Lacking(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (Lacking(x) -> Jacobean(x))\n\nUnsafe(farand)\n\ntherefore Unsafe(farand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Spence is orthogonal. Spence is denotive. Gisele is unaerated. Gisele is cimmerian. Dido is arrogant. Paule is nonmodern. Paule is cimmerian. If Dido is arrogant then Dido is denotive. Young things are orthogonal. Red, cimmerian things are confluent. All orthogonal things are denotive. If something is denotive and cimmerian then it is nonmodern. Young things are confluent. Paule is not nonmodern.", "logic": "\nOrthogonal(spence)\nDenotive(spence)\nUnaerated(gisele)\nCimmerian(gisele)\nArrogant(dido)\nNonmodern(paule)\nCimmerian(paule)\nArrogant(dido) -> Denotive(dido)\nforall x (Cimmerian(x) -> Orthogonal(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) and Cimmerian(x) -> Confluent(x))\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) -> Denotive(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) and Cimmerian(x) -> Nonmodern(x))\nforall x (Cimmerian(x) -> Confluent(x))\n\nnot Nonmodern(paule)\n\ntherefore Nonmodern(paule)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Ninette is finicky. Ninette is armenian. Thurstan is albescent. Thurstan is undraped. Ventura is sonsie. Merci is pedigreed. Merci is undraped. If Ventura is sonsie then Ventura is armenian. Young things are finicky. Red, undraped things are loathsome. All finicky things are armenian. If something is armenian and undraped then it is pedigreed. Young things are loathsome. Ventura is armenian.", "logic": "\nFinicky(ninette)\nArmenian(ninette)\nAlbescent(thurstan)\nUndraped(thurstan)\nSonsie(ventura)\nPedigreed(merci)\nUndraped(merci)\nSonsie(ventura) -> Armenian(ventura)\nforall x (Undraped(x) -> Finicky(x))\nforall x (Armenian(x) and Undraped(x) -> Loathsome(x))\nforall x (Finicky(x) -> Armenian(x))\nforall x (Armenian(x) and Undraped(x) -> Pedigreed(x))\nforall x (Undraped(x) -> Loathsome(x))\n\nArmenian(ventura)\n\nSonsie(ventura) and Sonsie(ventura) -> Armenian(ventura) -> therefore Armenian(ventura)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Francine is irregular. Francine is batwing. Byram is purifying. Byram is crinoid. Luciana is drastic. Lucilia is brainless. Lucilia is crinoid. If Luciana is drastic then Luciana is batwing. Young things are irregular. Red, crinoid things are chinchy. All irregular things are batwing. If something is batwing and crinoid then it is brainless. Young things are chinchy. Byram is not chinchy.", "logic": "\nIrregular(francine)\nBatwing(francine)\nPurifying(byram)\nCrinoid(byram)\nDrastic(luciana)\nBrainless(lucilia)\nCrinoid(lucilia)\nDrastic(luciana) -> Batwing(luciana)\nforall x (Crinoid(x) -> Irregular(x))\nforall x (Batwing(x) and Crinoid(x) -> Chinchy(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) -> Batwing(x))\nforall x (Batwing(x) and Crinoid(x) -> Brainless(x))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) -> Chinchy(x))\n\nnot Chinchy(byram)\n\nCrinoid(byram) and forall x (Crinoid(x) -> Chinchy(x)) -> therefore Chinchy(byram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Jessa is plenary. Jessa is languid. Arabella is sapphic. Arabella is brushlike. Hakim is caller. Myles is insomniac. Myles is brushlike. If Hakim is caller then Hakim is languid. Young things are plenary. Red, brushlike things are impolitic. All plenary things are languid. If something is languid and brushlike then it is insomniac. Young things are impolitic. Arabella is languid.", "logic": "\nPlenary(jessa)\nLanguid(jessa)\nSapphic(arabella)\nBrushlike(arabella)\nCaller(hakim)\nInsomniac(myles)\nBrushlike(myles)\nCaller(hakim) -> Languid(hakim)\nforall x (Brushlike(x) -> Plenary(x))\nforall x (Languid(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nforall x (Plenary(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Languid(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Brushlike(x) -> Impolitic(x))\n\nLanguid(arabella)\n\nBrushlike(arabella) and forall x (Brushlike(x) -> Plenary(x)) -> therefore Plenary(arabella) Plenary(arabella) and forall x (Plenary(x) -> Languid(x)) -> therefore Languid(arabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Adele is tubed. Adele is heady. Cherilynn is mastoid. Cherilynn is cunning. Gabbie is bolometric. Jephthah is indictable. Jephthah is cunning. If Gabbie is bolometric then Gabbie is heady. Young things are tubed. Red, cunning things are hypnagogic. All tubed things are heady. If something is heady and cunning then it is indictable. Young things are hypnagogic. Jephthah is not heady.", "logic": "\nTubed(adele)\nHeady(adele)\nMastoid(cherilynn)\nCunning(cherilynn)\nBolometric(gabbie)\nIndictable(jephthah)\nCunning(jephthah)\nBolometric(gabbie) -> Heady(gabbie)\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Tubed(x))\nforall x (Heady(x) and Cunning(x) -> Hypnagogic(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Heady(x) and Cunning(x) -> Indictable(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Hypnagogic(x))\n\nnot Heady(jephthah)\n\nCunning(jephthah) and forall x (Cunning(x) -> Tubed(x)) -> therefore Tubed(jephthah) Tubed(jephthah) and forall x (Tubed(x) -> Heady(x)) -> therefore Heady(jephthah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Margo is slavelike. Margo is appetizing. Hortense is limitless. Hortense is unionized. Roana is unhardened. Genni is snub. Genni is unionized. If Roana is unhardened then Roana is appetizing. Young things are slavelike. Red, unionized things are four. All slavelike things are appetizing. If something is appetizing and unionized then it is snub. Young things are four. Hortense is snub.", "logic": "\nSlavelike(margo)\nAppetizing(margo)\nLimitless(hortense)\nUnionized(hortense)\nUnhardened(roana)\nSnub(genni)\nUnionized(genni)\nUnhardened(roana) -> Appetizing(roana)\nforall x (Unionized(x) -> Slavelike(x))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and Unionized(x) -> Four(x))\nforall x (Slavelike(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and Unionized(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Unionized(x) -> Four(x))\n\nSnub(hortense)\n\nUnionized(hortense) and forall x (Unionized(x) -> Slavelike(x)) -> therefore Slavelike(hortense) Slavelike(hortense) and forall x (Slavelike(x) -> Appetizing(x)) -> therefore Appetizing(hortense) Appetizing(hortense) and Unionized(hortense) and forall x (Appetizing(x) and Unionized(x) -> Snub(x)) -> therefore Snub(hortense)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Adara is wrecked. Adara is exogamous. Joy is hypnoid. Joy is carefree. Katharina is banal. Nichol is tempering. Nichol is carefree. If Katharina is banal then Katharina is exogamous. Young things are wrecked. Red, carefree things are bilabiate. All wrecked things are exogamous. If something is exogamous and carefree then it is tempering. Young things are bilabiate. Joy is not tempering.", "logic": "\nWrecked(adara)\nExogamous(adara)\nHypnoid(joy)\nCarefree(joy)\nBanal(katharina)\nTempering(nichol)\nCarefree(nichol)\nBanal(katharina) -> Exogamous(katharina)\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) and Carefree(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) and Carefree(x) -> Tempering(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\n\nnot Tempering(joy)\n\nCarefree(joy) and forall x (Carefree(x) -> Wrecked(x)) -> therefore Wrecked(joy) Wrecked(joy) and forall x (Wrecked(x) -> Exogamous(x)) -> therefore Exogamous(joy) Exogamous(joy) and Carefree(joy) and forall x (Exogamous(x) and Carefree(x) -> Tempering(x)) -> therefore Tempering(joy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Scottie is solo. Scottie is unforced. Zulema is flecked. Zulema is coeliac. Helaina is bigeminal. Woodie is calced. Woodie is coeliac. If Helaina is bigeminal then Helaina is unforced. Young things are solo. Red, coeliac things are ferric. All solo things are unforced. If something is unforced and coeliac then it is calced. Young things are ferric. Helaina is not solo.", "logic": "\nSolo(scottie)\nUnforced(scottie)\nFlecked(zulema)\nCoeliac(zulema)\nBigeminal(helaina)\nCalced(woodie)\nCoeliac(woodie)\nBigeminal(helaina) -> Unforced(helaina)\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Unforced(x) and Coeliac(x) -> Ferric(x))\nforall x (Solo(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Unforced(x) and Coeliac(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Ferric(x))\n\nnot Solo(helaina)\n\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Solo(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Kristen is lacustrine. Kristen is chaste. Regan is unthawed. Regan is lamarckian. Adi is unstaged. Jonie is succinct. Jonie is lamarckian. If Adi is unstaged then Adi is chaste. Young things are lacustrine. Red, lamarckian things are indrawn. All lacustrine things are chaste. If something is chaste and lamarckian then it is succinct. Young things are indrawn. Adi is succinct.", "logic": "\nLacustrine(kristen)\nChaste(kristen)\nUnthawed(regan)\nLamarckian(regan)\nUnstaged(adi)\nSuccinct(jonie)\nLamarckian(jonie)\nUnstaged(adi) -> Chaste(adi)\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) -> Lacustrine(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) and Lamarckian(x) -> Indrawn(x))\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) -> Chaste(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) and Lamarckian(x) -> Succinct(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) -> Indrawn(x))\n\nSuccinct(adi)\n\nforall x (Chaste(x) and Lamarckian(x) -> Succinct(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Jori is super. Jori is hidden. Andreas is itinerant. Andreas is unpleasant. Aubrette is breastless. Vern is curricular. Vern is unpleasant. If Aubrette is breastless then Aubrette is hidden. Young things are super. Red, unpleasant things are variform. All super things are hidden. If something is hidden and unpleasant then it is curricular. Young things are variform. Jori is not variform.", "logic": "\nSuper(jori)\nHidden(jori)\nItinerant(andreas)\nUnpleasant(andreas)\nBreastless(aubrette)\nCurricular(vern)\nUnpleasant(vern)\nBreastless(aubrette) -> Hidden(aubrette)\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Super(x))\nforall x (Hidden(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Super(x) -> Hidden(x))\nforall x (Hidden(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Curricular(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Variform(x))\n\nnot Variform(jori)\n\nforall x (Hidden(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Variform(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Dianna is analyzed. Dianna is nonstop. Joleen is tractable. Joleen is venerating. Charil is backswept. Dino is affirmable. Dino is venerating. If Charil is backswept then Charil is nonstop. Young things are analyzed. Red, venerating things are ranging. All analyzed things are nonstop. If something is nonstop and venerating then it is affirmable. Young things are ranging. Dianna is affirmable.", "logic": "\nAnalyzed(dianna)\nNonstop(dianna)\nTractable(joleen)\nVenerating(joleen)\nBackswept(charil)\nAffirmable(dino)\nVenerating(dino)\nBackswept(charil) -> Nonstop(charil)\nforall x (Venerating(x) -> Analyzed(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and Venerating(x) -> Ranging(x))\nforall x (Analyzed(x) -> Nonstop(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and Venerating(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nforall x (Venerating(x) -> Ranging(x))\n\nAffirmable(dianna)\n\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and Venerating(x) -> Affirmable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Hayley is airsick. Hayley is unfeminine. Clair is furled. Clair is dioestrous. Brice is knitted. Niven is titanic. Niven is dioestrous. If Brice is knitted then Brice is unfeminine. Young things are airsick. Red, dioestrous things are strange. All airsick things are unfeminine. If something is unfeminine and dioestrous then it is titanic. Young things are strange. Hayley is not furled.", "logic": "\nAirsick(hayley)\nUnfeminine(hayley)\nFurled(clair)\nDioestrous(clair)\nKnitted(brice)\nTitanic(niven)\nDioestrous(niven)\nKnitted(brice) -> Unfeminine(brice)\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Airsick(x))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and Dioestrous(x) -> Strange(x))\nforall x (Airsick(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and Dioestrous(x) -> Titanic(x))\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Strange(x))\n\nnot Furled(hayley)\n\nnot Furled(hayley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Valry is four. Valry is bastardly. Hadleigh is pickled. Hadleigh is frigorific. Margo is precative. Mara is doting. Mara is frigorific. If Margo is precative then Margo is bastardly. Young things are four. Red, frigorific things are pacific. All four things are bastardly. If something is bastardly and frigorific then it is doting. Young things are pacific. Valry is frigorific.", "logic": "\nFour(valry)\nBastardly(valry)\nPickled(hadleigh)\nFrigorific(hadleigh)\nPrecative(margo)\nDoting(mara)\nFrigorific(mara)\nPrecative(margo) -> Bastardly(margo)\nforall x (Frigorific(x) -> Four(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Frigorific(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Four(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Frigorific(x) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) -> Pacific(x))\n\nFrigorific(valry)\n\nFrigorific(valry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Elfrieda is shambolic. Elfrieda is gaudy. Auria is burked. Auria is fabled. Auroora is ventral. Judith is gonadal. Judith is fabled. If Auroora is ventral then Auroora is gaudy. Young things are shambolic. Red, fabled things are suited. All shambolic things are gaudy. If something is gaudy and fabled then it is gonadal. Young things are suited. Auroora is not fabled.", "logic": "\nShambolic(elfrieda)\nGaudy(elfrieda)\nBurked(auria)\nFabled(auria)\nVentral(auroora)\nGonadal(judith)\nFabled(judith)\nVentral(auroora) -> Gaudy(auroora)\nforall x (Fabled(x) -> Shambolic(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Fabled(x) -> Suited(x))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Fabled(x) -> Gonadal(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) -> Suited(x))\n\nnot Fabled(auroora)\n\nnot Fabled(auroora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Henri is thundering. Henri is jejune. Dixie is neat. Dixie is fistular. Lonnie is connatural. Rab is idealized. Rab is fistular. If Lonnie is connatural then Lonnie is jejune. Young things are thundering. Red, fistular things are sotho. All thundering things are jejune. If something is jejune and fistular then it is idealized. Young things are sotho. Henri is connatural.", "logic": "\nThundering(henri)\nJejune(henri)\nNeat(dixie)\nFistular(dixie)\nConnatural(lonnie)\nIdealized(rab)\nFistular(rab)\nConnatural(lonnie) -> Jejune(lonnie)\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Thundering(x))\nforall x (Jejune(x) and Fistular(x) -> Sotho(x))\nforall x (Thundering(x) -> Jejune(x))\nforall x (Jejune(x) and Fistular(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Sotho(x))\n\nConnatural(henri)\n\nConnatural(henri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "The giordano team the marius. The josiah bedraggle the marius. The josiah is galled. The josiah is calcitic. The josiah team the giordano. The josiah plow the elnore. The josiah plow the marius. The elnore bedraggle the giordano. The elnore is aforesaid. The elnore team the marius. The elnore plow the giordano. The marius bedraggle the josiah. The marius is aforesaid. The marius team the giordano. The marius plow the elnore. If someone plow the josiah then the josiah is saved. If someone team the giordano then the giordano plow the josiah. If someone plow the elnore then they need the marius. If someone is saved and calcitic then they are aforesaid. If the marius team the elnore and the marius plow the giordano then the elnore is calcitic. If someone bedraggle the marius and the marius team the josiah then the josiah team the marius. The josiah is galled.", "logic": "\nTeam(giordano, marius)\nBedraggle(josiah, marius)\nGalled(josiah)\nCalcitic(josiah)\nTeam(josiah, giordano)\nPlow(josiah, elnore)\nPlow(josiah, marius)\nBedraggle(elnore, giordano)\nAforesaid(elnore)\nTeam(elnore, marius)\nPlow(elnore, giordano)\nBedraggle(marius, josiah)\nAforesaid(marius)\nTeam(marius, giordano)\nPlow(marius, elnore)\nforall x (Plow(x, josiah) -> Saved(josiah))\nforall x (Team(x, giordano) -> Plow(giordano, josiah))\nforall x (Plow(x, elnore) -> Team(x, marius))\nforall x (Saved(x) and Calcitic(x) -> Aforesaid(x))\nTeam(marius, elnore) and Plow(marius, giordano) -> Calcitic(elnore)\nforall x (Bedraggle(x, marius) and Team(marius, josiah) -> Team(josiah, marius))\n\nGalled(josiah)\n\ntherefore Galled(josiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The modestia jilt the leonerd. The calvin disbelieve the leonerd. The calvin is fanatic. The calvin is compact. The calvin jilt the modestia. The calvin vein the leanna. The calvin vein the leonerd. The leanna disbelieve the modestia. The leanna is azonic. The leanna jilt the leonerd. The leanna vein the modestia. The leonerd disbelieve the calvin. The leonerd is azonic. The leonerd jilt the modestia. The leonerd vein the leanna. If someone vein the calvin then the calvin is costumed. If someone jilt the modestia then the modestia vein the calvin. If someone vein the leanna then they need the leonerd. If someone is costumed and compact then they are azonic. If the leonerd jilt the leanna and the leonerd vein the modestia then the leanna is compact. If someone disbelieve the leonerd and the leonerd jilt the calvin then the calvin jilt the leonerd. The leanna does not visit the modestia.", "logic": "\nJilt(modestia, leonerd)\nDisbelieve(calvin, leonerd)\nFanatic(calvin)\nCompact(calvin)\nJilt(calvin, modestia)\nVein(calvin, leanna)\nVein(calvin, leonerd)\nDisbelieve(leanna, modestia)\nAzonic(leanna)\nJilt(leanna, leonerd)\nVein(leanna, modestia)\nDisbelieve(leonerd, calvin)\nAzonic(leonerd)\nJilt(leonerd, modestia)\nVein(leonerd, leanna)\nforall x (Vein(x, calvin) -> Costumed(calvin))\nforall x (Jilt(x, modestia) -> Vein(modestia, calvin))\nforall x (Vein(x, leanna) -> Jilt(x, leonerd))\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Compact(x) -> Azonic(x))\nJilt(leonerd, leanna) and Vein(leonerd, modestia) -> Compact(leanna)\nforall x (Disbelieve(x, leonerd) and Jilt(leonerd, calvin) -> Jilt(calvin, leonerd))\n\nnot Vein(leanna, modestia)\n\ntherefore Vein(leanna, modestia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The britni sculpt the laura. The briggs brail the laura. The briggs is effectual. The briggs is cataclinal. The briggs sculpt the britni. The briggs bung the merlina. The briggs bung the laura. The merlina brail the britni. The merlina is tamil. The merlina sculpt the laura. The merlina bung the britni. The laura brail the briggs. The laura is tamil. The laura sculpt the britni. The laura bung the merlina. If someone bung the briggs then the briggs is stationary. If someone sculpt the britni then the britni bung the briggs. If someone bung the merlina then they need the laura. If someone is stationary and cataclinal then they are tamil. If the laura sculpt the merlina and the laura bung the britni then the merlina is cataclinal. If someone brail the laura and the laura sculpt the briggs then the briggs sculpt the laura. The briggs sculpt the laura.", "logic": "\nSculpt(britni, laura)\nBrail(briggs, laura)\nEffectual(briggs)\nCataclinal(briggs)\nSculpt(briggs, britni)\nBung(briggs, merlina)\nBung(briggs, laura)\nBrail(merlina, britni)\nTamil(merlina)\nSculpt(merlina, laura)\nBung(merlina, britni)\nBrail(laura, briggs)\nTamil(laura)\nSculpt(laura, britni)\nBung(laura, merlina)\nforall x (Bung(x, briggs) -> Stationary(briggs))\nforall x (Sculpt(x, britni) -> Bung(britni, briggs))\nforall x (Bung(x, merlina) -> Sculpt(x, laura))\nforall x (Stationary(x) and Cataclinal(x) -> Tamil(x))\nSculpt(laura, merlina) and Bung(laura, britni) -> Cataclinal(merlina)\nforall x (Brail(x, laura) and Sculpt(laura, briggs) -> Sculpt(briggs, laura))\n\nSculpt(briggs, laura)\n\nBung(briggs, merlina) and forall x (Bung(x, merlina) -> Sculpt(x, laura)) -> therefore Sculpt(briggs, laura)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The terry inch the stillman. The billie niggle the stillman. The billie is acquired. The billie is adnate. The billie inch the terry. The billie worry the fey. The billie worry the stillman. The fey niggle the terry. The fey is vibratory. The fey inch the stillman. The fey worry the terry. The stillman niggle the billie. The stillman is vibratory. The stillman inch the terry. The stillman worry the fey. If someone worry the billie then the billie is dianoetic. If someone inch the terry then the terry worry the billie. If someone worry the fey then they need the stillman. If someone is dianoetic and adnate then they are vibratory. If the stillman inch the fey and the stillman worry the terry then the fey is adnate. If someone niggle the stillman and the stillman inch the billie then the billie inch the stillman. The terry does not visit the billie.", "logic": "\nInch(terry, stillman)\nNiggle(billie, stillman)\nAcquired(billie)\nAdnate(billie)\nInch(billie, terry)\nWorry(billie, fey)\nWorry(billie, stillman)\nNiggle(fey, terry)\nVibratory(fey)\nInch(fey, stillman)\nWorry(fey, terry)\nNiggle(stillman, billie)\nVibratory(stillman)\nInch(stillman, terry)\nWorry(stillman, fey)\nforall x (Worry(x, billie) -> Dianoetic(billie))\nforall x (Inch(x, terry) -> Worry(terry, billie))\nforall x (Worry(x, fey) -> Inch(x, stillman))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Adnate(x) -> Vibratory(x))\nInch(stillman, fey) and Worry(stillman, terry) -> Adnate(fey)\nforall x (Niggle(x, stillman) and Inch(stillman, billie) -> Inch(billie, stillman))\n\nnot Worry(terry, billie)\n\nInch(stillman, terry) and forall x (Inch(x, terry) -> Worry(terry, billie)) -> therefore Worry(terry, billie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The cissy wither the haleigh. The apostolos drone the haleigh. The apostolos is moronic. The apostolos is forked. The apostolos wither the cissy. The apostolos hemstitch the davie. The apostolos hemstitch the haleigh. The davie drone the cissy. The davie is outre. The davie wither the haleigh. The davie hemstitch the cissy. The haleigh drone the apostolos. The haleigh is outre. The haleigh wither the cissy. The haleigh hemstitch the davie. If someone hemstitch the apostolos then the apostolos is devilish. If someone wither the cissy then the cissy hemstitch the apostolos. If someone hemstitch the davie then they need the haleigh. If someone is devilish and forked then they are outre. If the haleigh wither the davie and the haleigh hemstitch the cissy then the davie is forked. If someone drone the haleigh and the haleigh wither the apostolos then the apostolos wither the haleigh. The apostolos is devilish.", "logic": "\nWither(cissy, haleigh)\nDrone(apostolos, haleigh)\nMoronic(apostolos)\nForked(apostolos)\nWither(apostolos, cissy)\nHemstitch(apostolos, davie)\nHemstitch(apostolos, haleigh)\nDrone(davie, cissy)\nOutre(davie)\nWither(davie, haleigh)\nHemstitch(davie, cissy)\nDrone(haleigh, apostolos)\nOutre(haleigh)\nWither(haleigh, cissy)\nHemstitch(haleigh, davie)\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, apostolos) -> Devilish(apostolos))\nforall x (Wither(x, cissy) -> Hemstitch(cissy, apostolos))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, davie) -> Wither(x, haleigh))\nforall x (Devilish(x) and Forked(x) -> Outre(x))\nWither(haleigh, davie) and Hemstitch(haleigh, cissy) -> Forked(davie)\nforall x (Drone(x, haleigh) and Wither(haleigh, apostolos) -> Wither(apostolos, haleigh))\n\nDevilish(apostolos)\n\nWither(haleigh, cissy) and forall x (Wither(x, cissy) -> Hemstitch(cissy, apostolos)) -> therefore Hemstitch(cissy, apostolos) Hemstitch(cissy, apostolos) and forall x (Hemstitch(x, apostolos) -> Devilish(apostolos)) -> therefore Devilish(apostolos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The prasad junketeer the cyndi. The melina illumine the cyndi. The melina is painless. The melina is phoenician. The melina junketeer the prasad. The melina manoeuver the lorine. The melina manoeuver the cyndi. The lorine illumine the prasad. The lorine is methylated. The lorine junketeer the cyndi. The lorine manoeuver the prasad. The cyndi illumine the melina. The cyndi is methylated. The cyndi junketeer the prasad. The cyndi manoeuver the lorine. If someone manoeuver the melina then the melina is ecologic. If someone junketeer the prasad then the prasad manoeuver the melina. If someone manoeuver the lorine then they need the cyndi. If someone is ecologic and phoenician then they are methylated. If the cyndi junketeer the lorine and the cyndi manoeuver the prasad then the lorine is phoenician. If someone illumine the cyndi and the cyndi junketeer the melina then the melina junketeer the cyndi. The melina is not ecologic.", "logic": "\nJunketeer(prasad, cyndi)\nIllumine(melina, cyndi)\nPainless(melina)\nPhoenician(melina)\nJunketeer(melina, prasad)\nManoeuver(melina, lorine)\nManoeuver(melina, cyndi)\nIllumine(lorine, prasad)\nMethylated(lorine)\nJunketeer(lorine, cyndi)\nManoeuver(lorine, prasad)\nIllumine(cyndi, melina)\nMethylated(cyndi)\nJunketeer(cyndi, prasad)\nManoeuver(cyndi, lorine)\nforall x (Manoeuver(x, melina) -> Ecologic(melina))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, prasad) -> Manoeuver(prasad, melina))\nforall x (Manoeuver(x, lorine) -> Junketeer(x, cyndi))\nforall x (Ecologic(x) and Phoenician(x) -> Methylated(x))\nJunketeer(cyndi, lorine) and Manoeuver(cyndi, prasad) -> Phoenician(lorine)\nforall x (Illumine(x, cyndi) and Junketeer(cyndi, melina) -> Junketeer(melina, cyndi))\n\nnot Ecologic(melina)\n\nJunketeer(cyndi, prasad) and forall x (Junketeer(x, prasad) -> Manoeuver(prasad, melina)) -> therefore Manoeuver(prasad, melina) Manoeuver(prasad, melina) and forall x (Manoeuver(x, melina) -> Ecologic(melina)) -> therefore Ecologic(melina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The antin luxate the halvard. The ken stunt the halvard. The ken is benighted. The ken is ceric. The ken luxate the antin. The ken embank the irita. The ken embank the halvard. The irita stunt the antin. The irita is credited. The irita luxate the halvard. The irita embank the antin. The halvard stunt the ken. The halvard is credited. The halvard luxate the antin. The halvard embank the irita. If someone embank the ken then the ken is filar. If someone luxate the antin then the antin embank the ken. If someone embank the irita then they need the halvard. If someone is filar and ceric then they are credited. If the halvard luxate the irita and the halvard embank the antin then the irita is ceric. If someone stunt the halvard and the halvard luxate the ken then the ken luxate the halvard. The ken is credited.", "logic": "\nLuxate(antin, halvard)\nStunt(ken, halvard)\nBenighted(ken)\nCeric(ken)\nLuxate(ken, antin)\nEmbank(ken, irita)\nEmbank(ken, halvard)\nStunt(irita, antin)\nCredited(irita)\nLuxate(irita, halvard)\nEmbank(irita, antin)\nStunt(halvard, ken)\nCredited(halvard)\nLuxate(halvard, antin)\nEmbank(halvard, irita)\nforall x (Embank(x, ken) -> Filar(ken))\nforall x (Luxate(x, antin) -> Embank(antin, ken))\nforall x (Embank(x, irita) -> Luxate(x, halvard))\nforall x (Filar(x) and Ceric(x) -> Credited(x))\nLuxate(halvard, irita) and Embank(halvard, antin) -> Ceric(irita)\nforall x (Stunt(x, halvard) and Luxate(halvard, ken) -> Luxate(ken, halvard))\n\nCredited(ken)\n\nLuxate(halvard, antin) and forall x (Luxate(x, antin) -> Embank(antin, ken)) -> therefore Embank(antin, ken) Embank(antin, ken) and forall x (Embank(x, ken) -> Filar(ken)) -> therefore Filar(ken) Filar(ken) and Ceric(ken) and forall x (Filar(x) and Ceric(x) -> Credited(x)) -> therefore Credited(ken)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The madelon globalize the bliss. The quintina toady the bliss. The quintina is accurst. The quintina is boned. The quintina globalize the madelon. The quintina clap the muriel. The quintina clap the bliss. The muriel toady the madelon. The muriel is surplus. The muriel globalize the bliss. The muriel clap the madelon. The bliss toady the quintina. The bliss is surplus. The bliss globalize the madelon. The bliss clap the muriel. If someone clap the quintina then the quintina is acetylic. If someone globalize the madelon then the madelon clap the quintina. If someone clap the muriel then they need the bliss. If someone is acetylic and boned then they are surplus. If the bliss globalize the muriel and the bliss clap the madelon then the muriel is boned. If someone toady the bliss and the bliss globalize the quintina then the quintina globalize the bliss. The quintina is not surplus.", "logic": "\nGlobalize(madelon, bliss)\nToady(quintina, bliss)\nAccurst(quintina)\nBoned(quintina)\nGlobalize(quintina, madelon)\nClap(quintina, muriel)\nClap(quintina, bliss)\nToady(muriel, madelon)\nSurplus(muriel)\nGlobalize(muriel, bliss)\nClap(muriel, madelon)\nToady(bliss, quintina)\nSurplus(bliss)\nGlobalize(bliss, madelon)\nClap(bliss, muriel)\nforall x (Clap(x, quintina) -> Acetylic(quintina))\nforall x (Globalize(x, madelon) -> Clap(madelon, quintina))\nforall x (Clap(x, muriel) -> Globalize(x, bliss))\nforall x (Acetylic(x) and Boned(x) -> Surplus(x))\nGlobalize(bliss, muriel) and Clap(bliss, madelon) -> Boned(muriel)\nforall x (Toady(x, bliss) and Globalize(bliss, quintina) -> Globalize(quintina, bliss))\n\nnot Surplus(quintina)\n\nGlobalize(bliss, madelon) and forall x (Globalize(x, madelon) -> Clap(madelon, quintina)) -> therefore Clap(madelon, quintina) Clap(madelon, quintina) and forall x (Clap(x, quintina) -> Acetylic(quintina)) -> therefore Acetylic(quintina) Acetylic(quintina) and Boned(quintina) and forall x (Acetylic(x) and Boned(x) -> Surplus(x)) -> therefore Surplus(quintina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The rosabella vary the hinda. The andros reeve the hinda. The andros is sheeny. The andros is graphic. The andros vary the rosabella. The andros diminish the emmett. The andros diminish the hinda. The emmett reeve the rosabella. The emmett is evaporated. The emmett vary the hinda. The emmett diminish the rosabella. The hinda reeve the andros. The hinda is evaporated. The hinda vary the rosabella. The hinda diminish the emmett. If someone diminish the andros then the andros is illicit. If someone vary the rosabella then the rosabella diminish the andros. If someone diminish the emmett then they need the hinda. If someone is illicit and graphic then they are evaporated. If the hinda vary the emmett and the hinda diminish the rosabella then the emmett is graphic. If someone reeve the hinda and the hinda vary the andros then the andros vary the hinda. The rosabella is not evaporated.", "logic": "\nVary(rosabella, hinda)\nReeve(andros, hinda)\nSheeny(andros)\nGraphic(andros)\nVary(andros, rosabella)\nDiminish(andros, emmett)\nDiminish(andros, hinda)\nReeve(emmett, rosabella)\nEvaporated(emmett)\nVary(emmett, hinda)\nDiminish(emmett, rosabella)\nReeve(hinda, andros)\nEvaporated(hinda)\nVary(hinda, rosabella)\nDiminish(hinda, emmett)\nforall x (Diminish(x, andros) -> Illicit(andros))\nforall x (Vary(x, rosabella) -> Diminish(rosabella, andros))\nforall x (Diminish(x, emmett) -> Vary(x, hinda))\nforall x (Illicit(x) and Graphic(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nVary(hinda, emmett) and Diminish(hinda, rosabella) -> Graphic(emmett)\nforall x (Reeve(x, hinda) and Vary(hinda, andros) -> Vary(andros, hinda))\n\nnot Evaporated(rosabella)\n\nforall x (Illicit(x) and Graphic(x) -> Evaporated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The ashely impinge the nelia. The trenton wane the nelia. The trenton is optimistic. The trenton is eligible. The trenton impinge the ashely. The trenton desire the ursola. The trenton desire the nelia. The ursola wane the ashely. The ursola is burdensome. The ursola impinge the nelia. The ursola desire the ashely. The nelia wane the trenton. The nelia is burdensome. The nelia impinge the ashely. The nelia desire the ursola. If someone desire the trenton then the trenton is blebby. If someone impinge the ashely then the ashely desire the trenton. If someone desire the ursola then they need the nelia. If someone is blebby and eligible then they are burdensome. If the nelia impinge the ursola and the nelia desire the ashely then the ursola is eligible. If someone wane the nelia and the nelia impinge the trenton then the trenton impinge the nelia. The ursola is eligible.", "logic": "\nImpinge(ashely, nelia)\nWane(trenton, nelia)\nOptimistic(trenton)\nEligible(trenton)\nImpinge(trenton, ashely)\nDesire(trenton, ursola)\nDesire(trenton, nelia)\nWane(ursola, ashely)\nBurdensome(ursola)\nImpinge(ursola, nelia)\nDesire(ursola, ashely)\nWane(nelia, trenton)\nBurdensome(nelia)\nImpinge(nelia, ashely)\nDesire(nelia, ursola)\nforall x (Desire(x, trenton) -> Blebby(trenton))\nforall x (Impinge(x, ashely) -> Desire(ashely, trenton))\nforall x (Desire(x, ursola) -> Impinge(x, nelia))\nforall x (Blebby(x) and Eligible(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nImpinge(nelia, ursola) and Desire(nelia, ashely) -> Eligible(ursola)\nforall x (Wane(x, nelia) and Impinge(nelia, trenton) -> Impinge(trenton, nelia))\n\nEligible(ursola)\n\nImpinge(nelia, ursola) and Desire(nelia, ashely) -> Eligible(ursola) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The trix leash the alfonso. The waite picnic the alfonso. The waite is dimorphic. The waite is polyphonic. The waite leash the trix. The waite avulse the lucie. The waite avulse the alfonso. The lucie picnic the trix. The lucie is prostyle. The lucie leash the alfonso. The lucie avulse the trix. The alfonso picnic the waite. The alfonso is prostyle. The alfonso leash the trix. The alfonso avulse the lucie. If someone avulse the waite then the waite is avid. If someone leash the trix then the trix avulse the waite. If someone avulse the lucie then they need the alfonso. If someone is avid and polyphonic then they are prostyle. If the alfonso leash the lucie and the alfonso avulse the trix then the lucie is polyphonic. If someone picnic the alfonso and the alfonso leash the waite then the waite leash the alfonso. The waite does not chase the trix.", "logic": "\nLeash(trix, alfonso)\nPicnic(waite, alfonso)\nDimorphic(waite)\nPolyphonic(waite)\nLeash(waite, trix)\nAvulse(waite, lucie)\nAvulse(waite, alfonso)\nPicnic(lucie, trix)\nProstyle(lucie)\nLeash(lucie, alfonso)\nAvulse(lucie, trix)\nPicnic(alfonso, waite)\nProstyle(alfonso)\nLeash(alfonso, trix)\nAvulse(alfonso, lucie)\nforall x (Avulse(x, waite) -> Avid(waite))\nforall x (Leash(x, trix) -> Avulse(trix, waite))\nforall x (Avulse(x, lucie) -> Leash(x, alfonso))\nforall x (Avid(x) and Polyphonic(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nLeash(alfonso, lucie) and Avulse(alfonso, trix) -> Polyphonic(lucie)\nforall x (Picnic(x, alfonso) and Leash(alfonso, waite) -> Leash(waite, alfonso))\n\nnot Picnic(waite, trix)\n\nnot Picnic(waite, trix) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The tanny waffle the gertrude. The beret bobble the gertrude. The beret is greensick. The beret is crocketed. The beret waffle the tanny. The beret cockle the heidie. The beret cockle the gertrude. The heidie bobble the tanny. The heidie is mental. The heidie waffle the gertrude. The heidie cockle the tanny. The gertrude bobble the beret. The gertrude is mental. The gertrude waffle the tanny. The gertrude cockle the heidie. If someone cockle the beret then the beret is romantic. If someone waffle the tanny then the tanny cockle the beret. If someone cockle the heidie then they need the gertrude. If someone is romantic and crocketed then they are mental. If the gertrude waffle the heidie and the gertrude cockle the tanny then the heidie is crocketed. If someone bobble the gertrude and the gertrude waffle the beret then the beret waffle the gertrude. The beret bobble the beret.", "logic": "\nWaffle(tanny, gertrude)\nBobble(beret, gertrude)\nGreensick(beret)\nCrocketed(beret)\nWaffle(beret, tanny)\nCockle(beret, heidie)\nCockle(beret, gertrude)\nBobble(heidie, tanny)\nMental(heidie)\nWaffle(heidie, gertrude)\nCockle(heidie, tanny)\nBobble(gertrude, beret)\nMental(gertrude)\nWaffle(gertrude, tanny)\nCockle(gertrude, heidie)\nforall x (Cockle(x, beret) -> Romantic(beret))\nforall x (Waffle(x, tanny) -> Cockle(tanny, beret))\nforall x (Cockle(x, heidie) -> Waffle(x, gertrude))\nforall x (Romantic(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Mental(x))\nWaffle(gertrude, heidie) and Cockle(gertrude, tanny) -> Crocketed(heidie)\nforall x (Bobble(x, gertrude) and Waffle(gertrude, beret) -> Waffle(beret, gertrude))\n\nBobble(beret, beret)\n\nBobble(beret, beret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The dolli harm the catharine. The mead bodge the catharine. The mead is ameban. The mead is alike. The mead harm the dolli. The mead spike the lynde. The mead spike the catharine. The lynde bodge the dolli. The lynde is wimpish. The lynde harm the catharine. The lynde spike the dolli. The catharine bodge the mead. The catharine is wimpish. The catharine harm the dolli. The catharine spike the lynde. If someone spike the mead then the mead is aeolian. If someone harm the dolli then the dolli spike the mead. If someone spike the lynde then they need the catharine. If someone is aeolian and alike then they are wimpish. If the catharine harm the lynde and the catharine spike the dolli then the lynde is alike. If someone bodge the catharine and the catharine harm the mead then the mead harm the catharine. The mead does not need the mead.", "logic": "\nHarm(dolli, catharine)\nBodge(mead, catharine)\nAmeban(mead)\nAlike(mead)\nHarm(mead, dolli)\nSpike(mead, lynde)\nSpike(mead, catharine)\nBodge(lynde, dolli)\nWimpish(lynde)\nHarm(lynde, catharine)\nSpike(lynde, dolli)\nBodge(catharine, mead)\nWimpish(catharine)\nHarm(catharine, dolli)\nSpike(catharine, lynde)\nforall x (Spike(x, mead) -> Aeolian(mead))\nforall x (Harm(x, dolli) -> Spike(dolli, mead))\nforall x (Spike(x, lynde) -> Harm(x, catharine))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) and Alike(x) -> Wimpish(x))\nHarm(catharine, lynde) and Spike(catharine, dolli) -> Alike(lynde)\nforall x (Bodge(x, catharine) and Harm(catharine, mead) -> Harm(mead, catharine))\n\nnot Harm(mead, mead)\n\nnot Harm(mead, mead) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The rosemarie recidivate the laure. The ruperta grout the laure. The ruperta is rising. The ruperta is bilocular. The ruperta recidivate the rosemarie. The ruperta clothe the antone. The ruperta clothe the laure. The antone grout the rosemarie. The antone is unmixed. The antone recidivate the laure. The antone clothe the rosemarie. The laure grout the ruperta. The laure is unmixed. The laure recidivate the rosemarie. The laure clothe the antone. If someone clothe the ruperta then the ruperta is ecuadorian. If someone recidivate the rosemarie then the rosemarie clothe the ruperta. If someone clothe the antone then they need the laure. If someone is ecuadorian and bilocular then they are unmixed. If the laure recidivate the antone and the laure clothe the rosemarie then the antone is bilocular. If someone grout the laure and the laure recidivate the ruperta then the ruperta recidivate the laure. The rosemarie grout the ruperta.", "logic": "\nRecidivate(rosemarie, laure)\nGrout(ruperta, laure)\nRising(ruperta)\nBilocular(ruperta)\nRecidivate(ruperta, rosemarie)\nClothe(ruperta, antone)\nClothe(ruperta, laure)\nGrout(antone, rosemarie)\nUnmixed(antone)\nRecidivate(antone, laure)\nClothe(antone, rosemarie)\nGrout(laure, ruperta)\nUnmixed(laure)\nRecidivate(laure, rosemarie)\nClothe(laure, antone)\nforall x (Clothe(x, ruperta) -> Ecuadorian(ruperta))\nforall x (Recidivate(x, rosemarie) -> Clothe(rosemarie, ruperta))\nforall x (Clothe(x, antone) -> Recidivate(x, laure))\nforall x (Ecuadorian(x) and Bilocular(x) -> Unmixed(x))\nRecidivate(laure, antone) and Clothe(laure, rosemarie) -> Bilocular(antone)\nforall x (Grout(x, laure) and Recidivate(laure, ruperta) -> Recidivate(ruperta, laure))\n\nGrout(rosemarie, ruperta)\n\nGrout(rosemarie, ruperta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The way pasteurise the karylin. The vallie mulct the karylin. The vallie is trilingual. The vallie is ferial. The vallie pasteurise the way. The vallie scold the win. The vallie scold the karylin. The win mulct the way. The win is buttonlike. The win pasteurise the karylin. The win scold the way. The karylin mulct the vallie. The karylin is buttonlike. The karylin pasteurise the way. The karylin scold the win. If someone scold the vallie then the vallie is dendriform. If someone pasteurise the way then the way scold the vallie. If someone scold the win then they need the karylin. If someone is dendriform and ferial then they are buttonlike. If the karylin pasteurise the win and the karylin scold the way then the win is ferial. If someone mulct the karylin and the karylin pasteurise the vallie then the vallie pasteurise the karylin. The win does not chase the win.", "logic": "\nPasteurise(way, karylin)\nMulct(vallie, karylin)\nTrilingual(vallie)\nFerial(vallie)\nPasteurise(vallie, way)\nScold(vallie, win)\nScold(vallie, karylin)\nMulct(win, way)\nButtonlike(win)\nPasteurise(win, karylin)\nScold(win, way)\nMulct(karylin, vallie)\nButtonlike(karylin)\nPasteurise(karylin, way)\nScold(karylin, win)\nforall x (Scold(x, vallie) -> Dendriform(vallie))\nforall x (Pasteurise(x, way) -> Scold(way, vallie))\nforall x (Scold(x, win) -> Pasteurise(x, karylin))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) and Ferial(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nPasteurise(karylin, win) and Scold(karylin, way) -> Ferial(win)\nforall x (Mulct(x, karylin) and Pasteurise(karylin, vallie) -> Pasteurise(vallie, karylin))\n\nnot Mulct(win, win)\n\nnot Mulct(win, win) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The kary sandblast the godiva. The osmund decry the godiva. The osmund is delusive. The osmund is fallible. The osmund sandblast the kary. The osmund paddle the zebulon. The osmund paddle the godiva. The zebulon decry the kary. The zebulon is agraphic. The zebulon sandblast the godiva. The zebulon paddle the kary. The godiva decry the osmund. The godiva is agraphic. The godiva sandblast the kary. The godiva paddle the zebulon. If someone paddle the osmund then the osmund is blown. If someone sandblast the kary then the kary paddle the osmund. If someone paddle the zebulon then they need the godiva. If someone is blown and fallible then they are agraphic. If the godiva sandblast the zebulon and the godiva paddle the kary then the zebulon is fallible. If someone decry the godiva and the godiva sandblast the osmund then the osmund sandblast the godiva. The kary is blown.", "logic": "\nSandblast(kary, godiva)\nDecry(osmund, godiva)\nDelusive(osmund)\nFallible(osmund)\nSandblast(osmund, kary)\nPaddle(osmund, zebulon)\nPaddle(osmund, godiva)\nDecry(zebulon, kary)\nAgraphic(zebulon)\nSandblast(zebulon, godiva)\nPaddle(zebulon, kary)\nDecry(godiva, osmund)\nAgraphic(godiva)\nSandblast(godiva, kary)\nPaddle(godiva, zebulon)\nforall x (Paddle(x, osmund) -> Blown(osmund))\nforall x (Sandblast(x, kary) -> Paddle(kary, osmund))\nforall x (Paddle(x, zebulon) -> Sandblast(x, godiva))\nforall x (Blown(x) and Fallible(x) -> Agraphic(x))\nSandblast(godiva, zebulon) and Paddle(godiva, kary) -> Fallible(zebulon)\nforall x (Decry(x, godiva) and Sandblast(godiva, osmund) -> Sandblast(osmund, godiva))\n\nBlown(kary)\n\nBlown(kary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "Sibeal is selfless. Sibeal is transposed. Sibeal is tired. Sibeal is homebound. Sibeal is botulinal. Sibeal is exigent. Sibeal is prankish. Iris is selfless. Iris is transposed. Iris is tired. Iris is homebound. Iris is botulinal. Iris is exigent. Iris is prankish. Pavia is selfless. Pavia is homebound. All botulinal, exigent people are selfless. Quiet people are transposed. If someone is homebound and prankish then they are tired. If someone is homebound and prankish then they are selfless. All tired people are exigent. If someone is tired and selfless then they are exigent. All prankish people are homebound. Quiet people are prankish. Iris is tired.", "logic": "\nSelfless(sibeal)\nTransposed(sibeal)\nTired(sibeal)\nHomebound(sibeal)\nBotulinal(sibeal)\nExigent(sibeal)\nPrankish(sibeal)\nSelfless(iris)\nTransposed(iris)\nTired(iris)\nHomebound(iris)\nBotulinal(iris)\nExigent(iris)\nPrankish(iris)\nSelfless(pavia)\nHomebound(pavia)\nforall x (Botulinal(x) and Exigent(x) -> Selfless(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Transposed(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) and Prankish(x) -> Tired(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) and Prankish(x) -> Selfless(x))\nforall x (Tired(x) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Tired(x) and Selfless(x) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Prankish(x) -> Homebound(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Prankish(x))\n\nTired(iris)\n\ntherefore Tired(iris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Ruthe is washy. Ruthe is abient. Ruthe is ghanian. Ruthe is bereaved. Ruthe is subsidised. Ruthe is indecisive. Ruthe is unforced. Albertine is washy. Albertine is abient. Albertine is ghanian. Albertine is bereaved. Albertine is subsidised. Albertine is indecisive. Albertine is unforced. Beryl is washy. Beryl is bereaved. All subsidised, indecisive people are washy. Quiet people are abient. If someone is bereaved and unforced then they are ghanian. If someone is bereaved and unforced then they are washy. All ghanian people are indecisive. If someone is ghanian and washy then they are indecisive. All unforced people are bereaved. Quiet people are unforced. Ruthe is not abient.", "logic": "\nWashy(ruthe)\nAbient(ruthe)\nGhanian(ruthe)\nBereaved(ruthe)\nSubsidised(ruthe)\nIndecisive(ruthe)\nUnforced(ruthe)\nWashy(albertine)\nAbient(albertine)\nGhanian(albertine)\nBereaved(albertine)\nSubsidised(albertine)\nIndecisive(albertine)\nUnforced(albertine)\nWashy(beryl)\nBereaved(beryl)\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Indecisive(x) -> Washy(x))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) -> Abient(x))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) and Unforced(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) and Unforced(x) -> Washy(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Indecisive(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) and Washy(x) -> Indecisive(x))\nforall x (Unforced(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) -> Unforced(x))\n\nnot Abient(ruthe)\n\ntherefore Abient(ruthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Fedora is dished. Fedora is uncultured. Fedora is absorptive. Fedora is amnesic. Fedora is academic. Fedora is lxvi. Fedora is biweekly. Todd is dished. Todd is uncultured. Todd is absorptive. Todd is amnesic. Todd is academic. Todd is lxvi. Todd is biweekly. Merrilee is dished. Merrilee is amnesic. All academic, lxvi people are dished. Quiet people are uncultured. If someone is amnesic and biweekly then they are absorptive. If someone is amnesic and biweekly then they are dished. All absorptive people are lxvi. If someone is absorptive and dished then they are lxvi. All biweekly people are amnesic. Quiet people are biweekly. Merrilee is biweekly.", "logic": "\nDished(fedora)\nUncultured(fedora)\nAbsorptive(fedora)\nAmnesic(fedora)\nAcademic(fedora)\nLxvi(fedora)\nBiweekly(fedora)\nDished(todd)\nUncultured(todd)\nAbsorptive(todd)\nAmnesic(todd)\nAcademic(todd)\nLxvi(todd)\nBiweekly(todd)\nDished(merrilee)\nAmnesic(merrilee)\nforall x (Academic(x) and Lxvi(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Uncultured(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) and Biweekly(x) -> Absorptive(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) and Biweekly(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) and Dished(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Biweekly(x) -> Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Biweekly(x))\n\nBiweekly(merrilee)\n\nAmnesic(merrilee) and forall x (Amnesic(x) -> Biweekly(x)) -> therefore Biweekly(merrilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Cindi is thenal. Cindi is downhill. Cindi is splotched. Cindi is jointed. Cindi is parked. Cindi is ictal. Cindi is diffusive. Goddart is thenal. Goddart is downhill. Goddart is splotched. Goddart is jointed. Goddart is parked. Goddart is ictal. Goddart is diffusive. Nigel is thenal. Nigel is jointed. All parked, ictal people are thenal. Quiet people are downhill. If someone is jointed and diffusive then they are splotched. If someone is jointed and diffusive then they are thenal. All splotched people are ictal. If someone is splotched and thenal then they are ictal. All diffusive people are jointed. Quiet people are diffusive. Nigel is not downhill.", "logic": "\nThenal(cindi)\nDownhill(cindi)\nSplotched(cindi)\nJointed(cindi)\nParked(cindi)\nIctal(cindi)\nDiffusive(cindi)\nThenal(goddart)\nDownhill(goddart)\nSplotched(goddart)\nJointed(goddart)\nParked(goddart)\nIctal(goddart)\nDiffusive(goddart)\nThenal(nigel)\nJointed(nigel)\nforall x (Parked(x) and Ictal(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) -> Downhill(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) and Diffusive(x) -> Splotched(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) and Diffusive(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Splotched(x) -> Ictal(x))\nforall x (Splotched(x) and Thenal(x) -> Ictal(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) -> Jointed(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) -> Diffusive(x))\n\nnot Downhill(nigel)\n\nJointed(nigel) and forall x (Jointed(x) -> Downhill(x)) -> therefore Downhill(nigel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Durand is incurved. Durand is elastic. Durand is wound. Durand is vehicular. Durand is cleft. Durand is multistory. Durand is palatal. Melita is incurved. Melita is elastic. Melita is wound. Melita is vehicular. Melita is cleft. Melita is multistory. Melita is palatal. Regine is incurved. Regine is vehicular. All cleft, multistory people are incurved. Quiet people are elastic. If someone is vehicular and palatal then they are wound. If someone is vehicular and palatal then they are incurved. All wound people are multistory. If someone is wound and incurved then they are multistory. All palatal people are vehicular. Quiet people are palatal. Regine is wound.", "logic": "\nIncurved(durand)\nElastic(durand)\nWound(durand)\nVehicular(durand)\nCleft(durand)\nMultistory(durand)\nPalatal(durand)\nIncurved(melita)\nElastic(melita)\nWound(melita)\nVehicular(melita)\nCleft(melita)\nMultistory(melita)\nPalatal(melita)\nIncurved(regine)\nVehicular(regine)\nforall x (Cleft(x) and Multistory(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) and Palatal(x) -> Wound(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) and Palatal(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) and Incurved(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) -> Palatal(x))\n\nWound(regine)\n\nVehicular(regine) and forall x (Vehicular(x) -> Palatal(x)) -> therefore Palatal(regine) Vehicular(regine) and Palatal(regine) and forall x (Vehicular(x) and Palatal(x) -> Wound(x)) -> therefore Wound(regine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Angil is topnotch. Angil is overland. Angil is staccato. Angil is bombastic. Angil is adient. Angil is megalithic. Angil is blame. Elroy is topnotch. Elroy is overland. Elroy is staccato. Elroy is bombastic. Elroy is adient. Elroy is megalithic. Elroy is blame. Spenser is topnotch. Spenser is bombastic. All adient, megalithic people are topnotch. Quiet people are overland. If someone is bombastic and blame then they are staccato. If someone is bombastic and blame then they are topnotch. All staccato people are megalithic. If someone is staccato and topnotch then they are megalithic. All blame people are bombastic. Quiet people are blame. Spenser is not staccato.", "logic": "\nTopnotch(angil)\nOverland(angil)\nStaccato(angil)\nBombastic(angil)\nAdient(angil)\nMegalithic(angil)\nBlame(angil)\nTopnotch(elroy)\nOverland(elroy)\nStaccato(elroy)\nBombastic(elroy)\nAdient(elroy)\nMegalithic(elroy)\nBlame(elroy)\nTopnotch(spenser)\nBombastic(spenser)\nforall x (Adient(x) and Megalithic(x) -> Topnotch(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Overland(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and Blame(x) -> Staccato(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and Blame(x) -> Topnotch(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> Megalithic(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) and Topnotch(x) -> Megalithic(x))\nforall x (Blame(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Blame(x))\n\nnot Staccato(spenser)\n\nBombastic(spenser) and forall x (Bombastic(x) -> Blame(x)) -> therefore Blame(spenser) Bombastic(spenser) and Blame(spenser) and forall x (Bombastic(x) and Blame(x) -> Staccato(x)) -> therefore Staccato(spenser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Orton is coccal. Orton is bavarian. Orton is cupulate. Orton is semite. Orton is ideational. Orton is anamnestic. Orton is accrued. Oneida is coccal. Oneida is bavarian. Oneida is cupulate. Oneida is semite. Oneida is ideational. Oneida is anamnestic. Oneida is accrued. Letti is coccal. Letti is semite. All ideational, anamnestic people are coccal. Quiet people are bavarian. If someone is semite and accrued then they are cupulate. If someone is semite and accrued then they are coccal. All cupulate people are anamnestic. If someone is cupulate and coccal then they are anamnestic. All accrued people are semite. Quiet people are accrued. Letti is anamnestic.", "logic": "\nCoccal(orton)\nBavarian(orton)\nCupulate(orton)\nSemite(orton)\nIdeational(orton)\nAnamnestic(orton)\nAccrued(orton)\nCoccal(oneida)\nBavarian(oneida)\nCupulate(oneida)\nSemite(oneida)\nIdeational(oneida)\nAnamnestic(oneida)\nAccrued(oneida)\nCoccal(letti)\nSemite(letti)\nforall x (Ideational(x) and Anamnestic(x) -> Coccal(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Bavarian(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) and Accrued(x) -> Cupulate(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) and Accrued(x) -> Coccal(x))\nforall x (Cupulate(x) -> Anamnestic(x))\nforall x (Cupulate(x) and Coccal(x) -> Anamnestic(x))\nforall x (Accrued(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) -> Accrued(x))\n\nAnamnestic(letti)\n\nSemite(letti) and forall x (Semite(x) -> Accrued(x)) -> therefore Accrued(letti) Semite(letti) and Accrued(letti) and forall x (Semite(x) and Accrued(x) -> Cupulate(x)) -> therefore Cupulate(letti) Cupulate(letti) and forall x (Cupulate(x) -> Anamnestic(x)) -> therefore Anamnestic(letti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Karena is cartesian. Karena is invading. Karena is femoral. Karena is exalted. Karena is cropped. Karena is unembodied. Karena is unsubtle. Kimmy is cartesian. Kimmy is invading. Kimmy is femoral. Kimmy is exalted. Kimmy is cropped. Kimmy is unembodied. Kimmy is unsubtle. Viki is cartesian. Viki is exalted. All cropped, unembodied people are cartesian. Quiet people are invading. If someone is exalted and unsubtle then they are femoral. If someone is exalted and unsubtle then they are cartesian. All femoral people are unembodied. If someone is femoral and cartesian then they are unembodied. All unsubtle people are exalted. Quiet people are unsubtle. Viki is not unembodied.", "logic": "\nCartesian(karena)\nInvading(karena)\nFemoral(karena)\nExalted(karena)\nCropped(karena)\nUnembodied(karena)\nUnsubtle(karena)\nCartesian(kimmy)\nInvading(kimmy)\nFemoral(kimmy)\nExalted(kimmy)\nCropped(kimmy)\nUnembodied(kimmy)\nUnsubtle(kimmy)\nCartesian(viki)\nExalted(viki)\nforall x (Cropped(x) and Unembodied(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Invading(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) and Unsubtle(x) -> Femoral(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) and Unsubtle(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) and Cartesian(x) -> Unembodied(x))\nforall x (Unsubtle(x) -> Exalted(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\n\nnot Unembodied(viki)\n\nExalted(viki) and forall x (Exalted(x) -> Unsubtle(x)) -> therefore Unsubtle(viki) Exalted(viki) and Unsubtle(viki) and forall x (Exalted(x) and Unsubtle(x) -> Femoral(x)) -> therefore Femoral(viki) Femoral(viki) and forall x (Femoral(x) -> Unembodied(x)) -> therefore Unembodied(viki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Howie is buoyant. Howie is hindermost. Howie is lucifugal. Dannye is hindermost. Dannye is lucifugal. Francisco is violable. Francisco is unprompted. Francisco is lucifugal. Sarita is grassroots. Sarita is buoyant. All buoyant people are grassroots. If someone is violable then they are angelic. If Dannye is grassroots and Dannye is buoyant then Dannye is unprompted. If someone is hindermost and lucifugal then they are unprompted. All buoyant people are hindermost. All lucifugal people are angelic. If someone is hindermost then they are lucifugal. Rough people are hindermost. Howie is lucifugal.", "logic": "\nBuoyant(howie)\nHindermost(howie)\nLucifugal(howie)\nHindermost(dannye)\nLucifugal(dannye)\nViolable(francisco)\nUnprompted(francisco)\nLucifugal(francisco)\nGrassroots(sarita)\nBuoyant(sarita)\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> Grassroots(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) -> Angelic(x))\nGrassroots(dannye) and Buoyant(dannye) -> Unprompted(dannye)\nforall x (Hindermost(x) and Lucifugal(x) -> Unprompted(x))\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> Hindermost(x))\nforall x (Lucifugal(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Lucifugal(x))\nforall x (Angelic(x) -> Hindermost(x))\n\nLucifugal(howie)\n\ntherefore Lucifugal(howie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Emogene is chorionic. Emogene is duncical. Emogene is dinky. Orelee is duncical. Orelee is dinky. Cybil is disused. Cybil is nonmusical. Cybil is dinky. Josh is supported. Josh is chorionic. All chorionic people are supported. If someone is disused then they are delible. If Orelee is supported and Orelee is chorionic then Orelee is nonmusical. If someone is duncical and dinky then they are nonmusical. All chorionic people are duncical. All dinky people are delible. If someone is duncical then they are dinky. Rough people are duncical. Emogene is not duncical.", "logic": "\nChorionic(emogene)\nDuncical(emogene)\nDinky(emogene)\nDuncical(orelee)\nDinky(orelee)\nDisused(cybil)\nNonmusical(cybil)\nDinky(cybil)\nSupported(josh)\nChorionic(josh)\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Supported(x))\nforall x (Disused(x) -> Delible(x))\nSupported(orelee) and Chorionic(orelee) -> Nonmusical(orelee)\nforall x (Duncical(x) and Dinky(x) -> Nonmusical(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Duncical(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Delible(x))\nforall x (Duncical(x) -> Dinky(x))\nforall x (Delible(x) -> Duncical(x))\n\nnot Duncical(emogene)\n\ntherefore Duncical(emogene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Cameo is trained. Cameo is plodding. Cameo is ferric. Junie is plodding. Junie is ferric. Zacharia is mouthless. Zacharia is suffusive. Zacharia is ferric. Melanie is shallow. Melanie is trained. All trained people are shallow. If someone is mouthless then they are satirical. If Junie is shallow and Junie is trained then Junie is suffusive. If someone is plodding and ferric then they are suffusive. All trained people are plodding. All ferric people are satirical. If someone is plodding then they are ferric. Rough people are plodding. Cameo is shallow.", "logic": "\nTrained(cameo)\nPlodding(cameo)\nFerric(cameo)\nPlodding(junie)\nFerric(junie)\nMouthless(zacharia)\nSuffusive(zacharia)\nFerric(zacharia)\nShallow(melanie)\nTrained(melanie)\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Shallow(x))\nforall x (Mouthless(x) -> Satirical(x))\nShallow(junie) and Trained(junie) -> Suffusive(junie)\nforall x (Plodding(x) and Ferric(x) -> Suffusive(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Plodding(x))\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> Satirical(x))\nforall x (Plodding(x) -> Ferric(x))\nforall x (Satirical(x) -> Plodding(x))\n\nShallow(cameo)\n\nTrained(cameo) and forall x (Trained(x) -> Shallow(x)) -> therefore Shallow(cameo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Tracie is quick. Tracie is pastelike. Tracie is promissory. Ewart is pastelike. Ewart is promissory. Kira is rightist. Kira is lowborn. Kira is promissory. Oralie is aliquot. Oralie is quick. All quick people are aliquot. If someone is rightist then they are immoveable. If Ewart is aliquot and Ewart is quick then Ewart is lowborn. If someone is pastelike and promissory then they are lowborn. All quick people are pastelike. All promissory people are immoveable. If someone is pastelike then they are promissory. Rough people are pastelike. Tracie is not aliquot.", "logic": "\nQuick(tracie)\nPastelike(tracie)\nPromissory(tracie)\nPastelike(ewart)\nPromissory(ewart)\nRightist(kira)\nLowborn(kira)\nPromissory(kira)\nAliquot(oralie)\nQuick(oralie)\nforall x (Quick(x) -> Aliquot(x))\nforall x (Rightist(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nAliquot(ewart) and Quick(ewart) -> Lowborn(ewart)\nforall x (Pastelike(x) and Promissory(x) -> Lowborn(x))\nforall x (Quick(x) -> Pastelike(x))\nforall x (Promissory(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Pastelike(x) -> Promissory(x))\nforall x (Immoveable(x) -> Pastelike(x))\n\nnot Aliquot(tracie)\n\nQuick(tracie) and forall x (Quick(x) -> Aliquot(x)) -> therefore Aliquot(tracie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Derick is runty. Derick is fancy. Derick is jumentous. Joane is fancy. Joane is jumentous. Aleen is floored. Aleen is cased. Aleen is jumentous. Margareta is fledgling. Margareta is runty. All runty people are fledgling. If someone is floored then they are jointed. If Joane is fledgling and Joane is runty then Joane is cased. If someone is fancy and jumentous then they are cased. All runty people are fancy. All jumentous people are jointed. If someone is fancy then they are jumentous. Rough people are fancy. Margareta is jumentous.", "logic": "\nRunty(derick)\nFancy(derick)\nJumentous(derick)\nFancy(joane)\nJumentous(joane)\nFloored(aleen)\nCased(aleen)\nJumentous(aleen)\nFledgling(margareta)\nRunty(margareta)\nforall x (Runty(x) -> Fledgling(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) -> Jointed(x))\nFledgling(joane) and Runty(joane) -> Cased(joane)\nforall x (Fancy(x) and Jumentous(x) -> Cased(x))\nforall x (Runty(x) -> Fancy(x))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) -> Jointed(x))\nforall x (Fancy(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) -> Fancy(x))\n\nJumentous(margareta)\n\nRunty(margareta) and forall x (Runty(x) -> Fancy(x)) -> therefore Fancy(margareta) Fancy(margareta) and forall x (Fancy(x) -> Jumentous(x)) -> therefore Jumentous(margareta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Jobina is reachable. Jobina is araneidal. Jobina is refreshful. Morty is araneidal. Morty is refreshful. Marco is willful. Marco is stone. Marco is refreshful. Shlomo is oozing. Shlomo is reachable. All reachable people are oozing. If someone is willful then they are butyric. If Morty is oozing and Morty is reachable then Morty is stone. If someone is araneidal and refreshful then they are stone. All reachable people are araneidal. All refreshful people are butyric. If someone is araneidal then they are refreshful. Rough people are araneidal. Shlomo is not refreshful.", "logic": "\nReachable(jobina)\nAraneidal(jobina)\nRefreshful(jobina)\nAraneidal(morty)\nRefreshful(morty)\nWillful(marco)\nStone(marco)\nRefreshful(marco)\nOozing(shlomo)\nReachable(shlomo)\nforall x (Reachable(x) -> Oozing(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) -> Butyric(x))\nOozing(morty) and Reachable(morty) -> Stone(morty)\nforall x (Araneidal(x) and Refreshful(x) -> Stone(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) -> Araneidal(x))\nforall x (Refreshful(x) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) -> Refreshful(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) -> Araneidal(x))\n\nnot Refreshful(shlomo)\n\nReachable(shlomo) and forall x (Reachable(x) -> Araneidal(x)) -> therefore Araneidal(shlomo) Araneidal(shlomo) and forall x (Araneidal(x) -> Refreshful(x)) -> therefore Refreshful(shlomo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Ethelyn is sensuous. Ethelyn is unbarred. Ethelyn is unwatchful. Seamus is unbarred. Seamus is unwatchful. Nari is carbolated. Nari is pied. Nari is unwatchful. Felita is compelling. Felita is sensuous. All sensuous people are compelling. If someone is carbolated then they are patriotic. If Seamus is compelling and Seamus is sensuous then Seamus is pied. If someone is unbarred and unwatchful then they are pied. All sensuous people are unbarred. All unwatchful people are patriotic. If someone is unbarred then they are unwatchful. Rough people are unbarred. Felita is pied.", "logic": "\nSensuous(ethelyn)\nUnbarred(ethelyn)\nUnwatchful(ethelyn)\nUnbarred(seamus)\nUnwatchful(seamus)\nCarbolated(nari)\nPied(nari)\nUnwatchful(nari)\nCompelling(felita)\nSensuous(felita)\nforall x (Sensuous(x) -> Compelling(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Patriotic(x))\nCompelling(seamus) and Sensuous(seamus) -> Pied(seamus)\nforall x (Unbarred(x) and Unwatchful(x) -> Pied(x))\nforall x (Sensuous(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Unwatchful(x) -> Patriotic(x))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) -> Unbarred(x))\n\nPied(felita)\n\nSensuous(felita) and forall x (Sensuous(x) -> Unbarred(x)) -> therefore Unbarred(felita) Sensuous(felita) and forall x (Sensuous(x) -> Unbarred(x)) -> therefore Unbarred(felita) Unbarred(felita) and forall x (Unbarred(x) -> Unwatchful(x)) -> therefore Unwatchful(felita) Unbarred(felita) and Unwatchful(felita) and forall x (Unbarred(x) and Unwatchful(x) -> Pied(x)) -> therefore Pied(felita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Lauretta is fiftieth. Lauretta is phocine. Lauretta is regular. Viv is phocine. Viv is regular. Karon is codified. Karon is potential. Karon is regular. Twila is cubic. Twila is fiftieth. All fiftieth people are cubic. If someone is codified then they are grandiose. If Viv is cubic and Viv is fiftieth then Viv is potential. If someone is phocine and regular then they are potential. All fiftieth people are phocine. All regular people are grandiose. If someone is phocine then they are regular. Rough people are phocine. Twila is not potential.", "logic": "\nFiftieth(lauretta)\nPhocine(lauretta)\nRegular(lauretta)\nPhocine(viv)\nRegular(viv)\nCodified(karon)\nPotential(karon)\nRegular(karon)\nCubic(twila)\nFiftieth(twila)\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Cubic(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Grandiose(x))\nCubic(viv) and Fiftieth(viv) -> Potential(viv)\nforall x (Phocine(x) and Regular(x) -> Potential(x))\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Phocine(x))\nforall x (Regular(x) -> Grandiose(x))\nforall x (Phocine(x) -> Regular(x))\nforall x (Grandiose(x) -> Phocine(x))\n\nnot Potential(twila)\n\nFiftieth(twila) and forall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Phocine(x)) -> therefore Phocine(twila) Fiftieth(twila) and forall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Phocine(x)) -> therefore Phocine(twila) Phocine(twila) and forall x (Phocine(x) -> Regular(x)) -> therefore Regular(twila) Phocine(twila) and Regular(twila) and forall x (Phocine(x) and Regular(x) -> Potential(x)) -> therefore Potential(twila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Gweneth is baronial. Gweneth is obdurate. Gweneth is lidded. Noel is obdurate. Noel is lidded. Michel is sumptuous. Michel is depilatory. Michel is lidded. Archy is employed. Archy is baronial. All baronial people are employed. If someone is sumptuous then they are quality. If Noel is employed and Noel is baronial then Noel is depilatory. If someone is obdurate and lidded then they are depilatory. All baronial people are obdurate. All lidded people are quality. If someone is obdurate then they are lidded. Rough people are obdurate. Michel is not employed.", "logic": "\nBaronial(gweneth)\nObdurate(gweneth)\nLidded(gweneth)\nObdurate(noel)\nLidded(noel)\nSumptuous(michel)\nDepilatory(michel)\nLidded(michel)\nEmployed(archy)\nBaronial(archy)\nforall x (Baronial(x) -> Employed(x))\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Quality(x))\nEmployed(noel) and Baronial(noel) -> Depilatory(noel)\nforall x (Obdurate(x) and Lidded(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nforall x (Baronial(x) -> Obdurate(x))\nforall x (Lidded(x) -> Quality(x))\nforall x (Obdurate(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Quality(x) -> Obdurate(x))\n\nnot Employed(michel)\n\nforall x (Baronial(x) -> Employed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Zara is bush. Zara is hydroxy. Zara is serpentine. Matelda is hydroxy. Matelda is serpentine. Justin is rueful. Justin is greyish. Justin is serpentine. Sawyer is stagey. Sawyer is bush. All bush people are stagey. If someone is rueful then they are eparchial. If Matelda is stagey and Matelda is bush then Matelda is greyish. If someone is hydroxy and serpentine then they are greyish. All bush people are hydroxy. All serpentine people are eparchial. If someone is hydroxy then they are serpentine. Rough people are hydroxy. Matelda is stagey.", "logic": "\nBush(zara)\nHydroxy(zara)\nSerpentine(zara)\nHydroxy(matelda)\nSerpentine(matelda)\nRueful(justin)\nGreyish(justin)\nSerpentine(justin)\nStagey(sawyer)\nBush(sawyer)\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Stagey(x))\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Eparchial(x))\nStagey(matelda) and Bush(matelda) -> Greyish(matelda)\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) and Serpentine(x) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Hydroxy(x))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Eparchial(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nforall x (Eparchial(x) -> Hydroxy(x))\n\nStagey(matelda)\n\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Stagey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Ace is skittish. Ace is indolent. Ace is skittish. Wendell is indolent. Wendell is skittish. Niels is seagoing. Niels is cased. Niels is skittish. Jefry is orbitual. Jefry is skittish. All skittish people are orbitual. If someone is seagoing then they are robed. If Wendell is orbitual and Wendell is skittish then Wendell is cased. If someone is indolent and skittish then they are cased. All skittish people are indolent. All skittish people are robed. If someone is indolent then they are skittish. Rough people are indolent. Jefry is not seagoing.", "logic": "\nSkittish(ace)\nIndolent(ace)\nSkittish(ace)\nIndolent(wendell)\nSkittish(wendell)\nSeagoing(niels)\nCased(niels)\nSkittish(niels)\nOrbitual(jefry)\nSkittish(jefry)\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Orbitual(x))\nforall x (Seagoing(x) -> Robed(x))\nOrbitual(wendell) and Skittish(wendell) -> Cased(wendell)\nforall x (Indolent(x) and Skittish(x) -> Cased(x))\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Indolent(x))\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Robed(x))\nforall x (Indolent(x) -> Skittish(x))\nforall x (Robed(x) -> Indolent(x))\n\nnot Seagoing(jefry)\n\nnot Seagoing(jefry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Forrest is flammable. Forrest is unfruitful. Forrest is bituminoid. Ursala is unfruitful. Ursala is bituminoid. Stearn is fluffy. Stearn is imputable. Stearn is bituminoid. Rochell is voteless. Rochell is flammable. All flammable people are voteless. If someone is fluffy then they are republican. If Ursala is voteless and Ursala is flammable then Ursala is imputable. If someone is unfruitful and bituminoid then they are imputable. All flammable people are unfruitful. All bituminoid people are republican. If someone is unfruitful then they are bituminoid. Rough people are unfruitful. Forrest is fluffy.", "logic": "\nFlammable(forrest)\nUnfruitful(forrest)\nBituminoid(forrest)\nUnfruitful(ursala)\nBituminoid(ursala)\nFluffy(stearn)\nImputable(stearn)\nBituminoid(stearn)\nVoteless(rochell)\nFlammable(rochell)\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Voteless(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) -> Republican(x))\nVoteless(ursala) and Flammable(ursala) -> Imputable(ursala)\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) and Bituminoid(x) -> Imputable(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Unfruitful(x))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Republican(x) -> Unfruitful(x))\n\nFluffy(forrest)\n\nFluffy(forrest) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Adele is romany. Adele is wooden. Adele is maddened. Kellia is wooden. Kellia is maddened. Maryann is laureate. Maryann is seven. Maryann is maddened. Sari is balletic. Sari is romany. All romany people are balletic. If someone is laureate then they are slanted. If Kellia is balletic and Kellia is romany then Kellia is seven. If someone is wooden and maddened then they are seven. All romany people are wooden. All maddened people are slanted. If someone is wooden then they are maddened. Rough people are wooden. Kellia is not laureate.", "logic": "\nRomany(adele)\nWooden(adele)\nMaddened(adele)\nWooden(kellia)\nMaddened(kellia)\nLaureate(maryann)\nSeven(maryann)\nMaddened(maryann)\nBalletic(sari)\nRomany(sari)\nforall x (Romany(x) -> Balletic(x))\nforall x (Laureate(x) -> Slanted(x))\nBalletic(kellia) and Romany(kellia) -> Seven(kellia)\nforall x (Wooden(x) and Maddened(x) -> Seven(x))\nforall x (Romany(x) -> Wooden(x))\nforall x (Maddened(x) -> Slanted(x))\nforall x (Wooden(x) -> Maddened(x))\nforall x (Slanted(x) -> Wooden(x))\n\nnot Laureate(kellia)\n\nnot Laureate(kellia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Hazel is tweedy. Hazel is pinnated. Hazel is unpompous. Belicia is pinnated. Belicia is unpompous. Rafaela is syllabic. Rafaela is extinct. Rafaela is unpompous. Yale is thyroidal. Yale is tweedy. All tweedy people are thyroidal. If someone is syllabic then they are sordid. If Belicia is thyroidal and Belicia is tweedy then Belicia is extinct. If someone is pinnated and unpompous then they are extinct. All tweedy people are pinnated. All unpompous people are sordid. If someone is pinnated then they are unpompous. Rough people are pinnated. Belicia is tweedy.", "logic": "\nTweedy(hazel)\nPinnated(hazel)\nUnpompous(hazel)\nPinnated(belicia)\nUnpompous(belicia)\nSyllabic(rafaela)\nExtinct(rafaela)\nUnpompous(rafaela)\nThyroidal(yale)\nTweedy(yale)\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> Sordid(x))\nThyroidal(belicia) and Tweedy(belicia) -> Extinct(belicia)\nforall x (Pinnated(x) and Unpompous(x) -> Extinct(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) -> Pinnated(x))\nforall x (Unpompous(x) -> Sordid(x))\nforall x (Pinnated(x) -> Unpompous(x))\nforall x (Sordid(x) -> Pinnated(x))\n\nTweedy(belicia)\n\nTweedy(belicia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Raul is briefless. Skipp is briefless. Lori is grammatic. Hartwell is singable. Smart, singable people are dosed. Nice people are monaural. Round people are toothed. If Skipp is greatest then Skipp is grammatic. All singable people are toothed. Smart, monaural people are singable. Raul is briefless.", "logic": "\nBriefless(raul)\nBriefless(skipp)\nGrammatic(lori)\nSingable(hartwell)\nforall x (Toothed(x) and Singable(x) -> Dosed(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) -> Monaural(x))\nforall x (Briefless(x) -> Toothed(x))\nGreatest(skipp) -> Grammatic(skipp)\nforall x (Singable(x) -> Toothed(x))\nforall x (Toothed(x) and Monaural(x) -> Singable(x))\n\nBriefless(raul)\n\ntherefore Briefless(raul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Casandra is agitated. Davide is agitated. Mona is sisyphean. Spiro is handleless. Smart, handleless people are idiopathic. Nice people are minded. Round people are visceral. If Davide is uninsured then Davide is sisyphean. All handleless people are visceral. Smart, minded people are handleless. Mona is not sisyphean.", "logic": "\nAgitated(casandra)\nAgitated(davide)\nSisyphean(mona)\nHandleless(spiro)\nforall x (Visceral(x) and Handleless(x) -> Idiopathic(x))\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) -> Minded(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) -> Visceral(x))\nUninsured(davide) -> Sisyphean(davide)\nforall x (Handleless(x) -> Visceral(x))\nforall x (Visceral(x) and Minded(x) -> Handleless(x))\n\nnot Sisyphean(mona)\n\ntherefore Sisyphean(mona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Willette is nether. Roselia is nether. Marcelia is teentsy. Timothea is aeolian. Smart, aeolian people are amicable. Nice people are mitigatory. Round people are pleural. If Roselia is coptic then Roselia is teentsy. All aeolian people are pleural. Smart, mitigatory people are aeolian. Roselia is pleural.", "logic": "\nNether(willette)\nNether(roselia)\nTeentsy(marcelia)\nAeolian(timothea)\nforall x (Pleural(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Amicable(x))\nforall x (Amicable(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Pleural(x))\nCoptic(roselia) -> Teentsy(roselia)\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Pleural(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) and Mitigatory(x) -> Aeolian(x))\n\nPleural(roselia)\n\nNether(roselia) and forall x (Nether(x) -> Pleural(x)) -> therefore Pleural(roselia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Gisela is rightful. Maure is rightful. Barret is rife. Peyter is bowery. Smart, bowery people are guyanese. Nice people are heathlike. Round people are gory. If Maure is credal then Maure is rife. All bowery people are gory. Smart, heathlike people are bowery. Peyter is not gory.", "logic": "\nRightful(gisela)\nRightful(maure)\nRife(barret)\nBowery(peyter)\nforall x (Gory(x) and Bowery(x) -> Guyanese(x))\nforall x (Guyanese(x) -> Heathlike(x))\nforall x (Rightful(x) -> Gory(x))\nCredal(maure) -> Rife(maure)\nforall x (Bowery(x) -> Gory(x))\nforall x (Gory(x) and Heathlike(x) -> Bowery(x))\n\nnot Gory(peyter)\n\nBowery(peyter) and forall x (Bowery(x) -> Gory(x)) -> therefore Gory(peyter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Leonie is compulsive. Buster is compulsive. Aaron is adactylous. Louis is isotonic. Smart, isotonic people are raffish. Nice people are terse. Round people are rusty. If Buster is fearful then Buster is adactylous. All isotonic people are rusty. Smart, terse people are isotonic. Louis is raffish.", "logic": "\nCompulsive(leonie)\nCompulsive(buster)\nAdactylous(aaron)\nIsotonic(louis)\nforall x (Rusty(x) and Isotonic(x) -> Raffish(x))\nforall x (Raffish(x) -> Terse(x))\nforall x (Compulsive(x) -> Rusty(x))\nFearful(buster) -> Adactylous(buster)\nforall x (Isotonic(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Rusty(x) and Terse(x) -> Isotonic(x))\n\nRaffish(louis)\n\nIsotonic(louis) and forall x (Isotonic(x) -> Rusty(x)) -> therefore Rusty(louis) Rusty(louis) and Isotonic(louis) and forall x (Rusty(x) and Isotonic(x) -> Raffish(x)) -> therefore Raffish(louis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Storm is arranged. Amadeus is arranged. Benetta is greyish. Ruddy is teutonic. Smart, teutonic people are misbegot. Nice people are sacked. Round people are ammoniacal. If Amadeus is centrist then Amadeus is greyish. All teutonic people are ammoniacal. Smart, sacked people are teutonic. Ruddy is not misbegot.", "logic": "\nArranged(storm)\nArranged(amadeus)\nGreyish(benetta)\nTeutonic(ruddy)\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) and Teutonic(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Misbegot(x) -> Sacked(x))\nforall x (Arranged(x) -> Ammoniacal(x))\nCentrist(amadeus) -> Greyish(amadeus)\nforall x (Teutonic(x) -> Ammoniacal(x))\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) and Sacked(x) -> Teutonic(x))\n\nnot Misbegot(ruddy)\n\nTeutonic(ruddy) and forall x (Teutonic(x) -> Ammoniacal(x)) -> therefore Ammoniacal(ruddy) Ammoniacal(ruddy) and Teutonic(ruddy) and forall x (Ammoniacal(x) and Teutonic(x) -> Misbegot(x)) -> therefore Misbegot(ruddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Tonnie is prescient. Keriann is prescient. Chloette is merciful. Sheff is alphabetic. Smart, alphabetic people are fanatic. Nice people are afebrile. Round people are ruling. If Keriann is isometric then Keriann is merciful. All alphabetic people are ruling. Smart, afebrile people are alphabetic. Sheff is afebrile.", "logic": "\nPrescient(tonnie)\nPrescient(keriann)\nMerciful(chloette)\nAlphabetic(sheff)\nforall x (Ruling(x) and Alphabetic(x) -> Fanatic(x))\nforall x (Fanatic(x) -> Afebrile(x))\nforall x (Prescient(x) -> Ruling(x))\nIsometric(keriann) -> Merciful(keriann)\nforall x (Alphabetic(x) -> Ruling(x))\nforall x (Ruling(x) and Afebrile(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\n\nAfebrile(sheff)\n\nAlphabetic(sheff) and forall x (Alphabetic(x) -> Ruling(x)) -> therefore Ruling(sheff) Ruling(sheff) and Alphabetic(sheff) and forall x (Ruling(x) and Alphabetic(x) -> Fanatic(x)) -> therefore Fanatic(sheff) Fanatic(sheff) and forall x (Fanatic(x) -> Afebrile(x)) -> therefore Afebrile(sheff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Juliane is witless. Sidney is witless. Anastasie is lone. Bria is flowering. Smart, flowering people are uncaring. Nice people are allelic. Round people are foliose. If Sidney is convex then Sidney is lone. All flowering people are foliose. Smart, allelic people are flowering. Bria is not allelic.", "logic": "\nWitless(juliane)\nWitless(sidney)\nLone(anastasie)\nFlowering(bria)\nforall x (Foliose(x) and Flowering(x) -> Uncaring(x))\nforall x (Uncaring(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Witless(x) -> Foliose(x))\nConvex(sidney) -> Lone(sidney)\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Foliose(x))\nforall x (Foliose(x) and Allelic(x) -> Flowering(x))\n\nnot Allelic(bria)\n\nFlowering(bria) and forall x (Flowering(x) -> Foliose(x)) -> therefore Foliose(bria) Foliose(bria) and Flowering(bria) and forall x (Foliose(x) and Flowering(x) -> Uncaring(x)) -> therefore Uncaring(bria) Uncaring(bria) and forall x (Uncaring(x) -> Allelic(x)) -> therefore Allelic(bria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Florie is studied. Hinda is studied. Ximenez is capsulate. Shelden is stippled. Smart, stippled people are postal. Nice people are irish. Round people are unshakable. If Hinda is generic then Hinda is capsulate. All stippled people are unshakable. Smart, irish people are stippled. Ximenez is not unshakable.", "logic": "\nStudied(florie)\nStudied(hinda)\nCapsulate(ximenez)\nStippled(shelden)\nforall x (Unshakable(x) and Stippled(x) -> Postal(x))\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Studied(x) -> Unshakable(x))\nGeneric(hinda) -> Capsulate(hinda)\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Unshakable(x))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) and Irish(x) -> Stippled(x))\n\nnot Unshakable(ximenez)\n\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Unshakable(x)) <- forall x (Unshakable(x) and Irish(x) -> Stippled(x)) <- forall x (Studied(x) -> Unshakable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Goldia is gregarious. Mmarianne is gregarious. Garey is calculous. Rhonda is reliant. Smart, reliant people are unripe. Nice people are rotatable. Round people are guilty. If Mmarianne is submissive then Mmarianne is calculous. All reliant people are guilty. Smart, rotatable people are reliant. Mmarianne is unripe.", "logic": "\nGregarious(goldia)\nGregarious(mmarianne)\nCalculous(garey)\nReliant(rhonda)\nforall x (Guilty(x) and Reliant(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) -> Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Gregarious(x) -> Guilty(x))\nSubmissive(mmarianne) -> Calculous(mmarianne)\nforall x (Reliant(x) -> Guilty(x))\nforall x (Guilty(x) and Rotatable(x) -> Reliant(x))\n\nUnripe(mmarianne)\n\nforall x (Guilty(x) and Reliant(x) -> Unripe(x)) <- forall x (Guilty(x) and Rotatable(x) -> Reliant(x)) <- forall x (Unripe(x) -> Rotatable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Dalia is greensick. Tracy is greensick. Fernande is delicious. Guthrie is bandaged. Smart, bandaged people are whispering. Nice people are graspable. Round people are grasping. If Tracy is shackled then Tracy is delicious. All bandaged people are grasping. Smart, graspable people are bandaged. Fernande is not bandaged.", "logic": "\nGreensick(dalia)\nGreensick(tracy)\nDelicious(fernande)\nBandaged(guthrie)\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Bandaged(x) -> Whispering(x))\nforall x (Whispering(x) -> Graspable(x))\nforall x (Greensick(x) -> Grasping(x))\nShackled(tracy) -> Delicious(tracy)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Grasping(x))\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Graspable(x) -> Bandaged(x))\n\nnot Bandaged(fernande)\n\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Graspable(x) -> Bandaged(x)) <- forall x (Greensick(x) -> Grasping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Oren is manlike. Minetta is manlike. Aggi is sabine. Korrie is upwind. Smart, upwind people are possessive. Nice people are eviscerate. Round people are charming. If Minetta is proto then Minetta is sabine. All upwind people are charming. Smart, eviscerate people are upwind. Minetta is upwind.", "logic": "\nManlike(oren)\nManlike(minetta)\nSabine(aggi)\nUpwind(korrie)\nforall x (Charming(x) and Upwind(x) -> Possessive(x))\nforall x (Possessive(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\nforall x (Manlike(x) -> Charming(x))\nProto(minetta) -> Sabine(minetta)\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> Charming(x))\nforall x (Charming(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Upwind(x))\n\nUpwind(minetta)\n\nforall x (Charming(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Upwind(x)) <- forall x (Possessive(x) -> Eviscerate(x)) <- forall x (Charming(x) and Upwind(x) -> Possessive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Pieter is blotto. Stephine is blotto. Mugsy is gerundial. Etty is cusped. Smart, cusped people are febrile. Nice people are intimate. Round people are inartistic. If Stephine is negligible then Stephine is gerundial. All cusped people are inartistic. Smart, intimate people are cusped. Etty is not gerundial.", "logic": "\nBlotto(pieter)\nBlotto(stephine)\nGerundial(mugsy)\nCusped(etty)\nforall x (Inartistic(x) and Cusped(x) -> Febrile(x))\nforall x (Febrile(x) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Blotto(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nNegligible(stephine) -> Gerundial(stephine)\nforall x (Cusped(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Inartistic(x) and Intimate(x) -> Cusped(x))\n\nnot Gerundial(etty)\n\nnot Gerundial(etty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Billi is monogamous. Lissie is monogamous. Lilyan is unoiled. Charmain is ageing. Smart, ageing people are sprawling. Nice people are prankish. Round people are involved. If Lissie is affable then Lissie is unoiled. All ageing people are involved. Smart, prankish people are ageing. Lilyan is monogamous.", "logic": "\nMonogamous(billi)\nMonogamous(lissie)\nUnoiled(lilyan)\nAgeing(charmain)\nforall x (Involved(x) and Ageing(x) -> Sprawling(x))\nforall x (Sprawling(x) -> Prankish(x))\nforall x (Monogamous(x) -> Involved(x))\nAffable(lissie) -> Unoiled(lissie)\nforall x (Ageing(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) and Prankish(x) -> Ageing(x))\n\nMonogamous(lilyan)\n\nMonogamous(lilyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Worthy is perilous. Tami is perilous. Rozelle is subnormal. Doris is prosy. Smart, prosy people are apodeictic. Nice people are accustomed. Round people are predictive. If Tami is eidetic then Tami is subnormal. All prosy people are predictive. Smart, accustomed people are prosy. Rozelle is not eidetic.", "logic": "\nPerilous(worthy)\nPerilous(tami)\nSubnormal(rozelle)\nProsy(doris)\nforall x (Predictive(x) and Prosy(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Perilous(x) -> Predictive(x))\nEidetic(tami) -> Subnormal(tami)\nforall x (Prosy(x) -> Predictive(x))\nforall x (Predictive(x) and Accustomed(x) -> Prosy(x))\n\nnot Eidetic(rozelle)\n\nnot Eidetic(rozelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Anders is floccose. Happy is floccose. Calley is nascent. Elayne is verifying. Smart, verifying people are unwary. Nice people are stearic. Round people are volcanic. If Happy is andalusian then Happy is nascent. All verifying people are volcanic. Smart, stearic people are verifying. Elayne is floccose.", "logic": "\nFloccose(anders)\nFloccose(happy)\nNascent(calley)\nVerifying(elayne)\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Verifying(x) -> Unwary(x))\nforall x (Unwary(x) -> Stearic(x))\nforall x (Floccose(x) -> Volcanic(x))\nAndalusian(happy) -> Nascent(happy)\nforall x (Verifying(x) -> Volcanic(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Stearic(x) -> Verifying(x))\n\nFloccose(elayne)\n\nFloccose(elayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Mattheus is sham. Rana is anonymous. Filide is receptive. Bambie is anonymous. All diaphysial things are receptive. If something is ineffable and diaphysial then it is anonymous. If something is leptorhine and sham then it is anonymous. All diaphysial, receptive things are leptorhine. If something is anonymous then it is leptorhine. If something is leptorhine then it is diaphysial. Quiet things are receptive. If Mattheus is anonymous and Mattheus is sham then Mattheus is ineffable. Bambie is anonymous.", "logic": "\nSham(mattheus)\nAnonymous(rana)\nReceptive(filide)\nAnonymous(bambie)\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) -> Receptive(x))\nforall x (Ineffable(x) and Diaphysial(x) -> Anonymous(x))\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) and Sham(x) -> Anonymous(x))\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) and Receptive(x) -> Leptorhine(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Leptorhine(x))\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nforall x (Ineffable(x) -> Receptive(x))\nAnonymous(mattheus) and Sham(mattheus) -> Ineffable(mattheus)\n\nAnonymous(bambie)\n\ntherefore Anonymous(bambie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Karon is merciful. Nollie is stacked. Kylynn is nicene. Claudina is stacked. All paired things are nicene. If something is xxxiv and paired then it is stacked. If something is cathedral and merciful then it is stacked. All paired, nicene things are cathedral. If something is stacked then it is cathedral. If something is cathedral then it is paired. Quiet things are nicene. If Karon is stacked and Karon is merciful then Karon is xxxiv. Karon is not merciful.", "logic": "\nMerciful(karon)\nStacked(nollie)\nNicene(kylynn)\nStacked(claudina)\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Nicene(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Paired(x) -> Stacked(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Merciful(x) -> Stacked(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Nicene(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Stacked(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) -> Paired(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) -> Nicene(x))\nStacked(karon) and Merciful(karon) -> Xxxiv(karon)\n\nnot Merciful(karon)\n\ntherefore Merciful(karon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Sinclair is peaceable. Goldi is unposed. Stavros is divisive. Clancy is unposed. All south things are divisive. If something is uncharged and south then it is unposed. If something is bowlegged and peaceable then it is unposed. All south, divisive things are bowlegged. If something is unposed then it is bowlegged. If something is bowlegged then it is south. Quiet things are divisive. If Sinclair is unposed and Sinclair is peaceable then Sinclair is uncharged. Goldi is bowlegged.", "logic": "\nPeaceable(sinclair)\nUnposed(goldi)\nDivisive(stavros)\nUnposed(clancy)\nforall x (South(x) -> Divisive(x))\nforall x (Uncharged(x) and South(x) -> Unposed(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) and Peaceable(x) -> Unposed(x))\nforall x (South(x) and Divisive(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Divisive(x))\nUnposed(sinclair) and Peaceable(sinclair) -> Uncharged(sinclair)\n\nBowlegged(goldi)\n\nUnposed(goldi) and forall x (Unposed(x) -> Bowlegged(x)) -> therefore Bowlegged(goldi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Jed is blebby. Robenia is palatal. Muire is castled. Butler is palatal. All soapy things are castled. If something is sexy and soapy then it is palatal. If something is eery and blebby then it is palatal. All soapy, castled things are eery. If something is palatal then it is eery. If something is eery then it is soapy. Quiet things are castled. If Jed is palatal and Jed is blebby then Jed is sexy. Butler is not eery.", "logic": "\nBlebby(jed)\nPalatal(robenia)\nCastled(muire)\nPalatal(butler)\nforall x (Soapy(x) -> Castled(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) and Soapy(x) -> Palatal(x))\nforall x (Eery(x) and Blebby(x) -> Palatal(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) and Castled(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Eery(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) -> Castled(x))\nPalatal(jed) and Blebby(jed) -> Sexy(jed)\n\nnot Eery(butler)\n\nPalatal(butler) and forall x (Palatal(x) -> Eery(x)) -> therefore Eery(butler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Marie is laced. Skipton is bullnecked. Ash is alluring. Hugo is bullnecked. All slanderous things are alluring. If something is billed and slanderous then it is bullnecked. If something is spiderly and laced then it is bullnecked. All slanderous, alluring things are spiderly. If something is bullnecked then it is spiderly. If something is spiderly then it is slanderous. Quiet things are alluring. If Marie is bullnecked and Marie is laced then Marie is billed. Skipton is slanderous.", "logic": "\nLaced(marie)\nBullnecked(skipton)\nAlluring(ash)\nBullnecked(hugo)\nforall x (Slanderous(x) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Billed(x) and Slanderous(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) and Laced(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Alluring(x) -> Spiderly(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Spiderly(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Slanderous(x))\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Alluring(x))\nBullnecked(marie) and Laced(marie) -> Billed(marie)\n\nSlanderous(skipton)\n\nBullnecked(skipton) and forall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Spiderly(x)) -> therefore Spiderly(skipton) Spiderly(skipton) and forall x (Spiderly(x) -> Slanderous(x)) -> therefore Slanderous(skipton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Olaf is rhomboidal. Charles is unpatented. Augusto is mucoidal. Kane is unpatented. All tanned things are mucoidal. If something is aground and tanned then it is unpatented. If something is touristed and rhomboidal then it is unpatented. All tanned, mucoidal things are touristed. If something is unpatented then it is touristed. If something is touristed then it is tanned. Quiet things are mucoidal. If Olaf is unpatented and Olaf is rhomboidal then Olaf is aground. Charles is not tanned.", "logic": "\nRhomboidal(olaf)\nUnpatented(charles)\nMucoidal(augusto)\nUnpatented(kane)\nforall x (Tanned(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Aground(x) and Tanned(x) -> Unpatented(x))\nforall x (Touristed(x) and Rhomboidal(x) -> Unpatented(x))\nforall x (Tanned(x) and Mucoidal(x) -> Touristed(x))\nforall x (Unpatented(x) -> Touristed(x))\nforall x (Touristed(x) -> Tanned(x))\nforall x (Aground(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nUnpatented(olaf) and Rhomboidal(olaf) -> Aground(olaf)\n\nnot Tanned(charles)\n\nUnpatented(charles) and forall x (Unpatented(x) -> Touristed(x)) -> therefore Touristed(charles) Touristed(charles) and forall x (Touristed(x) -> Tanned(x)) -> therefore Tanned(charles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Tiphani is fledgeling. Dietrich is toned. Butler is vehicular. Federica is toned. All murine things are vehicular. If something is pungent and murine then it is toned. If something is canorous and fledgeling then it is toned. All murine, vehicular things are canorous. If something is toned then it is canorous. If something is canorous then it is murine. Quiet things are vehicular. If Tiphani is toned and Tiphani is fledgeling then Tiphani is pungent. Federica is vehicular.", "logic": "\nFledgeling(tiphani)\nToned(dietrich)\nVehicular(butler)\nToned(federica)\nforall x (Murine(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Pungent(x) and Murine(x) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Canorous(x) and Fledgeling(x) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Murine(x) and Vehicular(x) -> Canorous(x))\nforall x (Toned(x) -> Canorous(x))\nforall x (Canorous(x) -> Murine(x))\nforall x (Pungent(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nToned(tiphani) and Fledgeling(tiphani) -> Pungent(tiphani)\n\nVehicular(federica)\n\nToned(federica) and forall x (Toned(x) -> Canorous(x)) -> therefore Canorous(federica) Canorous(federica) and forall x (Canorous(x) -> Murine(x)) -> therefore Murine(federica) Murine(federica) and forall x (Murine(x) -> Vehicular(x)) -> therefore Vehicular(federica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Brenda is famous. Ginelle is cardinal. Cristine is vapourous. Midge is cardinal. All littler things are vapourous. If something is erstwhile and littler then it is cardinal. If something is xxxvi and famous then it is cardinal. All littler, vapourous things are xxxvi. If something is cardinal then it is xxxvi. If something is xxxvi then it is littler. Quiet things are vapourous. If Brenda is cardinal and Brenda is famous then Brenda is erstwhile. Ginelle is not vapourous.", "logic": "\nFamous(brenda)\nCardinal(ginelle)\nVapourous(cristine)\nCardinal(midge)\nforall x (Littler(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) and Littler(x) -> Cardinal(x))\nforall x (Xxxvi(x) and Famous(x) -> Cardinal(x))\nforall x (Littler(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nforall x (Xxxvi(x) -> Littler(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nCardinal(brenda) and Famous(brenda) -> Erstwhile(brenda)\n\nnot Vapourous(ginelle)\n\nCardinal(ginelle) and forall x (Cardinal(x) -> Xxxvi(x)) -> therefore Xxxvi(ginelle) Xxxvi(ginelle) and forall x (Xxxvi(x) -> Littler(x)) -> therefore Littler(ginelle) Littler(ginelle) and forall x (Littler(x) -> Vapourous(x)) -> therefore Vapourous(ginelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Juliane is tenebrious. Nolana is dusky. Ilysa is gonzo. Joab is dusky. All aphetic things are gonzo. If something is harmless and aphetic then it is dusky. If something is unruffled and tenebrious then it is dusky. All aphetic, gonzo things are unruffled. If something is dusky then it is unruffled. If something is unruffled then it is aphetic. Quiet things are gonzo. If Juliane is dusky and Juliane is tenebrious then Juliane is harmless. Juliane is not aphetic.", "logic": "\nTenebrious(juliane)\nDusky(nolana)\nGonzo(ilysa)\nDusky(joab)\nforall x (Aphetic(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nforall x (Harmless(x) and Aphetic(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) and Tenebrious(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Aphetic(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Aphetic(x))\nforall x (Harmless(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nDusky(juliane) and Tenebrious(juliane) -> Harmless(juliane)\n\nnot Aphetic(juliane)\n\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Aphetic(x)) <- forall x (Dusky(x) -> Unruffled(x)) <- forall x (Unruffled(x) and Tenebrious(x) -> Dusky(x)) <- forall x (Aphetic(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Unruffled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Torrance is arthurian. Elane is callow. Eugene is romish. Floyd is callow. All diaphysial things are romish. If something is brazilian and diaphysial then it is callow. If something is maximising and arthurian then it is callow. All diaphysial, romish things are maximising. If something is callow then it is maximising. If something is maximising then it is diaphysial. Quiet things are romish. If Torrance is callow and Torrance is arthurian then Torrance is brazilian. Torrance is brazilian.", "logic": "\nArthurian(torrance)\nCallow(elane)\nRomish(eugene)\nCallow(floyd)\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) -> Romish(x))\nforall x (Brazilian(x) and Diaphysial(x) -> Callow(x))\nforall x (Maximising(x) and Arthurian(x) -> Callow(x))\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) and Romish(x) -> Maximising(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) -> Maximising(x))\nforall x (Maximising(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nforall x (Brazilian(x) -> Romish(x))\nCallow(torrance) and Arthurian(torrance) -> Brazilian(torrance)\n\nBrazilian(torrance)\n\nCallow(torrance) and Arthurian(torrance) -> Brazilian(torrance) <- forall x (Maximising(x) and Arthurian(x) -> Callow(x)) <- forall x (Diaphysial(x) and Romish(x) -> Maximising(x)) <- forall x (Maximising(x) -> Diaphysial(x)) <- forall x (Callow(x) -> Maximising(x)) <- forall x (Brazilian(x) and Diaphysial(x) -> Callow(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Nev is exchanged. Mirabel is geodetic. Melina is underclass. Ignacius is geodetic. All scattered things are underclass. If something is societal and scattered then it is geodetic. If something is thematic and exchanged then it is geodetic. All scattered, underclass things are thematic. If something is geodetic then it is thematic. If something is thematic then it is scattered. Quiet things are underclass. If Nev is geodetic and Nev is exchanged then Nev is societal. Melina is not thematic.", "logic": "\nExchanged(nev)\nGeodetic(mirabel)\nUnderclass(melina)\nGeodetic(ignacius)\nforall x (Scattered(x) -> Underclass(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) and Scattered(x) -> Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Thematic(x) and Exchanged(x) -> Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Scattered(x) and Underclass(x) -> Thematic(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> Thematic(x))\nforall x (Thematic(x) -> Scattered(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) -> Underclass(x))\nGeodetic(nev) and Exchanged(nev) -> Societal(nev)\n\nnot Thematic(melina)\n\nforall x (Scattered(x) and Underclass(x) -> Thematic(x)) <- forall x (Thematic(x) -> Scattered(x)) <- forall x (Geodetic(x) -> Thematic(x)) <- forall x (Societal(x) and Scattered(x) -> Geodetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Xenos is bookish. Cordelie is ideal. Silas is unoriented. Gretta is ideal. All plenteous things are unoriented. If something is mozambican and plenteous then it is ideal. If something is acned and bookish then it is ideal. All plenteous, unoriented things are acned. If something is ideal then it is acned. If something is acned then it is plenteous. Quiet things are unoriented. If Xenos is ideal and Xenos is bookish then Xenos is mozambican. Silas is plenteous.", "logic": "\nBookish(xenos)\nIdeal(cordelie)\nUnoriented(silas)\nIdeal(gretta)\nforall x (Plenteous(x) -> Unoriented(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) and Plenteous(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Acned(x) and Bookish(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Plenteous(x) and Unoriented(x) -> Acned(x))\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Acned(x))\nforall x (Acned(x) -> Plenteous(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> Unoriented(x))\nIdeal(xenos) and Bookish(xenos) -> Mozambican(xenos)\n\nPlenteous(silas)\n\nforall x (Acned(x) -> Plenteous(x)) <- forall x (Ideal(x) -> Acned(x)) <- forall x (Mozambican(x) and Plenteous(x) -> Ideal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Jephthah is committed. Sonnnie is engraved. Colene is subfusc. Darcie is engraved. All subversive things are subfusc. If something is singsong and subversive then it is engraved. If something is sallow and committed then it is engraved. All subversive, subfusc things are sallow. If something is engraved then it is sallow. If something is sallow then it is subversive. Quiet things are subfusc. If Jephthah is engraved and Jephthah is committed then Jephthah is singsong. Sonnnie is not kind.", "logic": "\nCommitted(jephthah)\nEngraved(sonnnie)\nSubfusc(colene)\nEngraved(darcie)\nforall x (Subversive(x) -> Subfusc(x))\nforall x (Singsong(x) and Subversive(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Sallow(x) and Committed(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Subversive(x) and Subfusc(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Sallow(x) -> Subversive(x))\nforall x (Singsong(x) -> Subfusc(x))\nEngraved(jephthah) and Committed(jephthah) -> Singsong(jephthah)\n\nnot Kind(sonnnie)\n\nnot Kind(sonnnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Madlin is furred. Derrek is alkylic. Celle is doltish. Katrina is alkylic. All eight things are doltish. If something is fibrous and eight then it is alkylic. If something is arthritic and furred then it is alkylic. All eight, doltish things are arthritic. If something is alkylic then it is arthritic. If something is arthritic then it is eight. Quiet things are doltish. If Madlin is alkylic and Madlin is furred then Madlin is fibrous. Derrek is fibrous.", "logic": "\nFurred(madlin)\nAlkylic(derrek)\nDoltish(celle)\nAlkylic(katrina)\nforall x (Eight(x) -> Doltish(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) and Eight(x) -> Alkylic(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and Furred(x) -> Alkylic(x))\nforall x (Eight(x) and Doltish(x) -> Arthritic(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Arthritic(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) -> Doltish(x))\nAlkylic(madlin) and Furred(madlin) -> Fibrous(madlin)\n\nFibrous(derrek)\n\nFibrous(derrek) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Marin is fisheye. Cam is neuronal. Anselm is muslim. Dorena is neuronal. All spread things are muslim. If something is homostyled and spread then it is neuronal. If something is obovate and fisheye then it is neuronal. All spread, muslim things are obovate. If something is neuronal then it is obovate. If something is obovate then it is spread. Quiet things are muslim. If Marin is neuronal and Marin is fisheye then Marin is homostyled. Cam is not fisheye.", "logic": "\nFisheye(marin)\nNeuronal(cam)\nMuslim(anselm)\nNeuronal(dorena)\nforall x (Spread(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Spread(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Obovate(x) and Fisheye(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Spread(x) and Muslim(x) -> Obovate(x))\nforall x (Neuronal(x) -> Obovate(x))\nforall x (Obovate(x) -> Spread(x))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) -> Muslim(x))\nNeuronal(marin) and Fisheye(marin) -> Homostyled(marin)\n\nnot Fisheye(cam)\n\nnot Fisheye(cam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Mae is carboxylic. Harlene is striate. Ardene is lxxvi. Rona is striate. All necklike things are lxxvi. If something is bubbly and necklike then it is striate. If something is subliminal and carboxylic then it is striate. All necklike, lxxvi things are subliminal. If something is striate then it is subliminal. If something is subliminal then it is necklike. Quiet things are lxxvi. If Mae is striate and Mae is carboxylic then Mae is bubbly. Rona is carboxylic.", "logic": "\nCarboxylic(mae)\nStriate(harlene)\nLxxvi(ardene)\nStriate(rona)\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Bubbly(x) and Necklike(x) -> Striate(x))\nforall x (Subliminal(x) and Carboxylic(x) -> Striate(x))\nforall x (Necklike(x) and Lxxvi(x) -> Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Striate(x) -> Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Subliminal(x) -> Necklike(x))\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nStriate(mae) and Carboxylic(mae) -> Bubbly(mae)\n\nCarboxylic(rona)\n\nCarboxylic(rona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Abbie is xliii. Witold is minacious. Berkeley is xliii. Smart people are xliii. If Berkeley is hadean then Berkeley is thirteenth. Furry people are catalytic. If someone is catalytic and minacious then they are covetous. Blue, covetous people are thirteenth. Furry people are hadean. Abbie is xliii.", "logic": "\nXliii(abbie)\nMinacious(witold)\nXliii(berkeley)\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Xliii(x))\nHadean(berkeley) -> Thirteenth(berkeley)\nforall x (Minacious(x) -> Catalytic(x))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) and Minacious(x) -> Covetous(x))\nforall x (Xliii(x) and Covetous(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Minacious(x) -> Hadean(x))\n\nXliii(abbie)\n\ntherefore Xliii(abbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Gita is crabwise. Gwendolin is congestive. Charmain is crabwise. Smart people are crabwise. If Charmain is infected then Charmain is dispirited. Furry people are uncritical. If someone is uncritical and congestive then they are sprawling. Blue, sprawling people are dispirited. Furry people are infected. Charmain is not crabwise.", "logic": "\nCrabwise(gita)\nCongestive(gwendolin)\nCrabwise(charmain)\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Crabwise(x))\nInfected(charmain) -> Dispirited(charmain)\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Uncritical(x))\nforall x (Uncritical(x) and Congestive(x) -> Sprawling(x))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) and Sprawling(x) -> Dispirited(x))\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Infected(x))\n\nnot Crabwise(charmain)\n\ntherefore Crabwise(charmain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Janene is sporty. Alexei is powered. Jules is sporty. Smart people are sporty. If Jules is unplayful then Jules is wintry. Furry people are bantoid. If someone is bantoid and powered then they are motiveless. Blue, motiveless people are wintry. Furry people are unplayful. Alexei is unplayful.", "logic": "\nSporty(janene)\nPowered(alexei)\nSporty(jules)\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Sporty(x))\nUnplayful(jules) -> Wintry(jules)\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Bantoid(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) and Powered(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) and Motiveless(x) -> Wintry(x))\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Unplayful(x))\n\nUnplayful(alexei)\n\nPowered(alexei) and forall x (Powered(x) -> Unplayful(x)) -> therefore Unplayful(alexei)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Vivianne is diagnostic. Jessie is discharged. Jeraldine is diagnostic. Smart people are diagnostic. If Jeraldine is sinhala then Jeraldine is cultured. Furry people are hindmost. If someone is hindmost and discharged then they are dashed. Blue, dashed people are cultured. Furry people are sinhala. Jessie is not sinhala.", "logic": "\nDiagnostic(vivianne)\nDischarged(jessie)\nDiagnostic(jeraldine)\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Diagnostic(x))\nSinhala(jeraldine) -> Cultured(jeraldine)\nforall x (Discharged(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Hindmost(x) and Discharged(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Diagnostic(x) and Dashed(x) -> Cultured(x))\nforall x (Discharged(x) -> Sinhala(x))\n\nnot Sinhala(jessie)\n\nDischarged(jessie) and forall x (Discharged(x) -> Sinhala(x)) -> therefore Sinhala(jessie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Emelda is inactive. Rafe is carpal. Nadia is inactive. Smart people are inactive. If Nadia is antrorse then Nadia is bedded. Furry people are such. If someone is such and carpal then they are tenanted. Blue, tenanted people are bedded. Furry people are antrorse. Rafe is inactive.", "logic": "\nInactive(emelda)\nCarpal(rafe)\nInactive(nadia)\nforall x (Antrorse(x) -> Inactive(x))\nAntrorse(nadia) -> Bedded(nadia)\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Such(x))\nforall x (Such(x) and Carpal(x) -> Tenanted(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) and Tenanted(x) -> Bedded(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Antrorse(x))\n\nInactive(rafe)\n\nCarpal(rafe) and forall x (Carpal(x) -> Antrorse(x)) -> therefore Antrorse(rafe) Antrorse(rafe) and forall x (Antrorse(x) -> Inactive(x)) -> therefore Inactive(rafe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Hiram is antiguan. Carlita is borderline. Jemmy is antiguan. Smart people are antiguan. If Jemmy is messianic then Jemmy is lordotic. Furry people are adopted. If someone is adopted and borderline then they are honest. Blue, honest people are lordotic. Furry people are messianic. Carlita is not honest.", "logic": "\nAntiguan(hiram)\nBorderline(carlita)\nAntiguan(jemmy)\nforall x (Messianic(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nMessianic(jemmy) -> Lordotic(jemmy)\nforall x (Borderline(x) -> Adopted(x))\nforall x (Adopted(x) and Borderline(x) -> Honest(x))\nforall x (Antiguan(x) and Honest(x) -> Lordotic(x))\nforall x (Borderline(x) -> Messianic(x))\n\nnot Honest(carlita)\n\nBorderline(carlita) and forall x (Borderline(x) -> Adopted(x)) -> therefore Adopted(carlita) Adopted(carlita) and Borderline(carlita) and forall x (Adopted(x) and Borderline(x) -> Honest(x)) -> therefore Honest(carlita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Lemuel is preventive. Russ is lemony. Parwane is preventive. Smart people are preventive. If Parwane is scrupulous then Parwane is aleuronic. Furry people are leftish. If someone is leftish and lemony then they are foodless. Blue, foodless people are aleuronic. Furry people are scrupulous. Russ is aleuronic.", "logic": "\nPreventive(lemuel)\nLemony(russ)\nPreventive(parwane)\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Preventive(x))\nScrupulous(parwane) -> Aleuronic(parwane)\nforall x (Lemony(x) -> Leftish(x))\nforall x (Leftish(x) and Lemony(x) -> Foodless(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) and Foodless(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nforall x (Lemony(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\n\nAleuronic(russ)\n\nLemony(russ) and forall x (Lemony(x) -> Scrupulous(x)) -> therefore Scrupulous(russ) Scrupulous(russ) and forall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Preventive(x)) -> therefore Preventive(russ) Lemony(russ) and forall x (Lemony(x) -> Leftish(x)) -> therefore Leftish(russ) Leftish(russ) and Lemony(russ) and forall x (Leftish(x) and Lemony(x) -> Foodless(x)) -> therefore Foodless(russ) Preventive(russ) and Foodless(russ) and forall x (Preventive(x) and Foodless(x) -> Aleuronic(x)) -> therefore Aleuronic(russ)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Catlaina is footsore. Noreen is absurd. Desmond is footsore. Smart people are footsore. If Desmond is indisposed then Desmond is fidgety. Furry people are monatomic. If someone is monatomic and absurd then they are mazy. Blue, mazy people are fidgety. Furry people are indisposed. Noreen is not fidgety.", "logic": "\nFootsore(catlaina)\nAbsurd(noreen)\nFootsore(desmond)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) -> Footsore(x))\nIndisposed(desmond) -> Fidgety(desmond)\nforall x (Absurd(x) -> Monatomic(x))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Absurd(x) -> Mazy(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) and Mazy(x) -> Fidgety(x))\nforall x (Absurd(x) -> Indisposed(x))\n\nnot Fidgety(noreen)\n\nAbsurd(noreen) and forall x (Absurd(x) -> Indisposed(x)) -> therefore Indisposed(noreen) Indisposed(noreen) and forall x (Indisposed(x) -> Footsore(x)) -> therefore Footsore(noreen) Absurd(noreen) and forall x (Absurd(x) -> Monatomic(x)) -> therefore Monatomic(noreen) Monatomic(noreen) and Absurd(noreen) and forall x (Monatomic(x) and Absurd(x) -> Mazy(x)) -> therefore Mazy(noreen) Footsore(noreen) and Mazy(noreen) and forall x (Footsore(x) and Mazy(x) -> Fidgety(x)) -> therefore Fidgety(noreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Oran is cubist. Clive is rightish. Marion is cubist. Smart people are cubist. If Marion is pert then Marion is disunited. Furry people are secure. If someone is secure and rightish then they are trabecular. Blue, trabecular people are disunited. Furry people are pert. Marion is not secure.", "logic": "\nCubist(oran)\nRightish(clive)\nCubist(marion)\nforall x (Pert(x) -> Cubist(x))\nPert(marion) -> Disunited(marion)\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Secure(x))\nforall x (Secure(x) and Rightish(x) -> Trabecular(x))\nforall x (Cubist(x) and Trabecular(x) -> Disunited(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Pert(x))\n\nnot Secure(marion)\n\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Secure(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Atalanta is older. Serene is aliquot. Clarinda is older. Smart people are older. If Clarinda is bracteate then Clarinda is adagio. Furry people are imputable. If someone is imputable and aliquot then they are aoristic. Blue, aoristic people are adagio. Furry people are bracteate. Clarinda is aoristic.", "logic": "\nOlder(atalanta)\nAliquot(serene)\nOlder(clarinda)\nforall x (Bracteate(x) -> Older(x))\nBracteate(clarinda) -> Adagio(clarinda)\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Imputable(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Aliquot(x) -> Aoristic(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and Aoristic(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Bracteate(x))\n\nAoristic(clarinda)\n\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Aliquot(x) -> Aoristic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Hedy is commanding. Gardener is gastric. Elva is commanding. Smart people are commanding. If Elva is disturbed then Elva is dissonant. Furry people are semestral. If someone is semestral and gastric then they are ilxx. Blue, ilxx people are dissonant. Furry people are disturbed. Elva is not dissonant.", "logic": "\nCommanding(hedy)\nGastric(gardener)\nCommanding(elva)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Commanding(x))\nDisturbed(elva) -> Dissonant(elva)\nforall x (Gastric(x) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Semestral(x) and Gastric(x) -> Ilxx(x))\nforall x (Commanding(x) and Ilxx(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nforall x (Gastric(x) -> Disturbed(x))\n\nnot Dissonant(elva)\n\nDisturbed(elva) -> Dissonant(elva) <- forall x (Gastric(x) -> Disturbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Queada is dire. Joel is unvarying. Nadya is dire. Smart people are dire. If Nadya is cocky then Nadya is dreamy. Furry people are accrued. If someone is accrued and unvarying then they are plentiful. Blue, plentiful people are dreamy. Furry people are cocky. Queada is plentiful.", "logic": "\nDire(queada)\nUnvarying(joel)\nDire(nadya)\nforall x (Cocky(x) -> Dire(x))\nCocky(nadya) -> Dreamy(nadya)\nforall x (Unvarying(x) -> Accrued(x))\nforall x (Accrued(x) and Unvarying(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Dire(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Dreamy(x))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) -> Cocky(x))\n\nPlentiful(queada)\n\nforall x (Accrued(x) and Unvarying(x) -> Plentiful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Timothee is rampant. Ilene is rustproof. Theada is rampant. Smart people are rampant. If Theada is clonal then Theada is decadent. Furry people are carbonylic. If someone is carbonylic and rustproof then they are orbiculate. Blue, orbiculate people are decadent. Furry people are clonal. Theada is not rustproof.", "logic": "\nRampant(timothee)\nRustproof(ilene)\nRampant(theada)\nforall x (Clonal(x) -> Rampant(x))\nClonal(theada) -> Decadent(theada)\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Carbonylic(x))\nforall x (Carbonylic(x) and Rustproof(x) -> Orbiculate(x))\nforall x (Rampant(x) and Orbiculate(x) -> Decadent(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Clonal(x))\n\nnot Rustproof(theada)\n\nnot Rustproof(theada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Alleen is catchy. Linnet is uncordial. Wolfgang is catchy. Smart people are catchy. If Wolfgang is amylaceous then Wolfgang is equipt. Furry people are hempen. If someone is hempen and uncordial then they are asteroid. Blue, asteroid people are equipt. Furry people are amylaceous. Linnet is nice.", "logic": "\nCatchy(alleen)\nUncordial(linnet)\nCatchy(wolfgang)\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) -> Catchy(x))\nAmylaceous(wolfgang) -> Equipt(wolfgang)\nforall x (Uncordial(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) and Uncordial(x) -> Asteroid(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and Asteroid(x) -> Equipt(x))\nforall x (Uncordial(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\n\nNice(linnet)\n\nNice(linnet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Bridgett is consoling. Josephus is marmorean. Hedy is consoling. Smart people are consoling. If Hedy is effaceable then Hedy is sharpened. Furry people are elevated. If someone is elevated and marmorean then they are fuggy. Blue, fuggy people are sharpened. Furry people are effaceable. Bridgett is not nice.", "logic": "\nConsoling(bridgett)\nMarmorean(josephus)\nConsoling(hedy)\nforall x (Effaceable(x) -> Consoling(x))\nEffaceable(hedy) -> Sharpened(hedy)\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Elevated(x))\nforall x (Elevated(x) and Marmorean(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Consoling(x) and Fuggy(x) -> Sharpened(x))\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Effaceable(x))\n\nnot Nice(bridgett)\n\nnot Nice(bridgett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Moshe is coaxal. Bobine is discreet. Wilt is coaxal. Smart people are coaxal. If Wilt is untracked then Wilt is shaken. Furry people are denotative. If someone is denotative and discreet then they are palmar. Blue, palmar people are shaken. Furry people are untracked. Moshe is discreet.", "logic": "\nCoaxal(moshe)\nDiscreet(bobine)\nCoaxal(wilt)\nforall x (Untracked(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nUntracked(wilt) -> Shaken(wilt)\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Denotative(x))\nforall x (Denotative(x) and Discreet(x) -> Palmar(x))\nforall x (Coaxal(x) and Palmar(x) -> Shaken(x))\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Untracked(x))\n\nDiscreet(moshe)\n\nDiscreet(moshe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "The gwenora anathemize the almeria. The almeria fondle the rosalinda. The rosalinda deflect the gwenora. If something deflect the gwenora then it fondle the almeria. If the rosalinda fondle the gwenora and the rosalinda is tracheal then the rosalinda fondle the almeria. If something fondle the rosalinda and it anathemize the rosalinda then it deflect the gwenora. If something anathemize the almeria and the almeria is buteonine then it is tracheal. If something anathemize the almeria then the almeria anathemize the rosalinda. If something anathemize the gwenora then the gwenora is buteonine. The rosalinda deflect the gwenora.", "logic": "\nAnathemize(gwenora, almeria)\nFondle(almeria, rosalinda)\nDeflect(rosalinda, gwenora)\nforall x (Deflect(x, gwenora) -> Fondle(x, almeria))\nFondle(rosalinda, gwenora) and Tracheal(rosalinda) -> Fondle(rosalinda, almeria)\nforall x (Fondle(x, rosalinda) and Anathemize(x, rosalinda) -> Deflect(x, gwenora))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, almeria) and Buteonine(almeria) -> Tracheal(x))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, almeria) -> Anathemize(almeria, rosalinda))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, gwenora) -> Buteonine(gwenora))\n\nDeflect(rosalinda, gwenora)\n\ntherefore Deflect(rosalinda, gwenora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The adlai hydrolise the reyna. The reyna dally the taite. The taite overpower the adlai. If something overpower the adlai then it dally the reyna. If the taite dally the adlai and the taite is suffusive then the taite dally the reyna. If something dally the taite and it hydrolise the taite then it overpower the adlai. If something hydrolise the reyna and the reyna is toothlike then it is suffusive. If something hydrolise the reyna then the reyna hydrolise the taite. If something hydrolise the adlai then the adlai is toothlike. The taite does not visit the adlai.", "logic": "\nHydrolise(adlai, reyna)\nDally(reyna, taite)\nOverpower(taite, adlai)\nforall x (Overpower(x, adlai) -> Dally(x, reyna))\nDally(taite, adlai) and Suffusive(taite) -> Dally(taite, reyna)\nforall x (Dally(x, taite) and Hydrolise(x, taite) -> Overpower(x, adlai))\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, reyna) and Toothlike(reyna) -> Suffusive(x))\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, reyna) -> Hydrolise(reyna, taite))\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, adlai) -> Toothlike(adlai))\n\nnot Overpower(taite, adlai)\n\ntherefore Overpower(taite, adlai)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The marj machine the delphina. The delphina rust the cordy. The cordy market the marj. If something market the marj then it rust the delphina. If the cordy rust the marj and the cordy is fingered then the cordy rust the delphina. If something rust the cordy and it machine the cordy then it market the marj. If something machine the delphina and the delphina is nonunion then it is fingered. If something machine the delphina then the delphina machine the cordy. If something machine the marj then the marj is nonunion. The delphina machine the cordy.", "logic": "\nMachine(marj, delphina)\nRust(delphina, cordy)\nMarket(cordy, marj)\nforall x (Market(x, marj) -> Rust(x, delphina))\nRust(cordy, marj) and Fingered(cordy) -> Rust(cordy, delphina)\nforall x (Rust(x, cordy) and Machine(x, cordy) -> Market(x, marj))\nforall x (Machine(x, delphina) and Nonunion(delphina) -> Fingered(x))\nforall x (Machine(x, delphina) -> Machine(delphina, cordy))\nforall x (Machine(x, marj) -> Nonunion(marj))\n\nMachine(delphina, cordy)\n\nMachine(marj, delphina) and forall x (Machine(x, delphina) -> Machine(delphina, cordy)) -> therefore Machine(delphina, cordy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The raphael doodle the leighton. The leighton disguise the jeannine. The jeannine sense the raphael. If something sense the raphael then it disguise the leighton. If the jeannine disguise the raphael and the jeannine is oneiric then the jeannine disguise the leighton. If something disguise the jeannine and it doodle the jeannine then it sense the raphael. If something doodle the leighton and the leighton is italian then it is oneiric. If something doodle the leighton then the leighton doodle the jeannine. If something doodle the raphael then the raphael is italian. The jeannine does not see the leighton.", "logic": "\nDoodle(raphael, leighton)\nDisguise(leighton, jeannine)\nSense(jeannine, raphael)\nforall x (Sense(x, raphael) -> Disguise(x, leighton))\nDisguise(jeannine, raphael) and Oneiric(jeannine) -> Disguise(jeannine, leighton)\nforall x (Disguise(x, jeannine) and Doodle(x, jeannine) -> Sense(x, raphael))\nforall x (Doodle(x, leighton) and Italian(leighton) -> Oneiric(x))\nforall x (Doodle(x, leighton) -> Doodle(leighton, jeannine))\nforall x (Doodle(x, raphael) -> Italian(raphael))\n\nnot Disguise(jeannine, leighton)\n\nSense(jeannine, raphael) and forall x (Sense(x, raphael) -> Disguise(x, leighton)) -> therefore Disguise(jeannine, leighton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The judson impede the ralina. The ralina amount the nanny. The nanny festoon the judson. If something festoon the judson then it amount the ralina. If the nanny amount the judson and the nanny is cashable then the nanny amount the ralina. If something amount the nanny and it impede the nanny then it festoon the judson. If something impede the ralina and the ralina is twoscore then it is cashable. If something impede the ralina then the ralina impede the nanny. If something impede the judson then the judson is twoscore. The ralina festoon the judson.", "logic": "\nImpede(judson, ralina)\nAmount(ralina, nanny)\nFestoon(nanny, judson)\nforall x (Festoon(x, judson) -> Amount(x, ralina))\nAmount(nanny, judson) and Cashable(nanny) -> Amount(nanny, ralina)\nforall x (Amount(x, nanny) and Impede(x, nanny) -> Festoon(x, judson))\nforall x (Impede(x, ralina) and Twoscore(ralina) -> Cashable(x))\nforall x (Impede(x, ralina) -> Impede(ralina, nanny))\nforall x (Impede(x, judson) -> Twoscore(judson))\n\nFestoon(ralina, judson)\n\nImpede(judson, ralina) and forall x (Impede(x, ralina) -> Impede(ralina, nanny)) -> therefore Impede(ralina, nanny) Amount(ralina, nanny) and Impede(ralina, nanny) and forall x (Amount(x, nanny) and Impede(x, nanny) -> Festoon(x, judson)) -> therefore Festoon(ralina, judson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The bride abrogate the ofella. The ofella diabolise the diahann. The diahann abase the bride. If something abase the bride then it diabolise the ofella. If the diahann diabolise the bride and the diahann is formosan then the diahann diabolise the ofella. If something diabolise the diahann and it abrogate the diahann then it abase the bride. If something abrogate the ofella and the ofella is rattling then it is formosan. If something abrogate the ofella then the ofella abrogate the diahann. If something abrogate the bride then the bride is rattling. The ofella does not visit the bride.", "logic": "\nAbrogate(bride, ofella)\nDiabolise(ofella, diahann)\nAbase(diahann, bride)\nforall x (Abase(x, bride) -> Diabolise(x, ofella))\nDiabolise(diahann, bride) and Formosan(diahann) -> Diabolise(diahann, ofella)\nforall x (Diabolise(x, diahann) and Abrogate(x, diahann) -> Abase(x, bride))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, ofella) and Rattling(ofella) -> Formosan(x))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, ofella) -> Abrogate(ofella, diahann))\nforall x (Abrogate(x, bride) -> Rattling(bride))\n\nnot Abase(ofella, bride)\n\nAbrogate(bride, ofella) and forall x (Abrogate(x, ofella) -> Abrogate(ofella, diahann)) -> therefore Abrogate(ofella, diahann) Diabolise(ofella, diahann) and Abrogate(ofella, diahann) and forall x (Diabolise(x, diahann) and Abrogate(x, diahann) -> Abase(x, bride)) -> therefore Abase(ofella, bride)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The lowell range the ginnie. The ginnie ammonify the shaw. The shaw demo the lowell. If something demo the lowell then it ammonify the ginnie. If the shaw ammonify the lowell and the shaw is respective then the shaw ammonify the ginnie. If something ammonify the shaw and it range the shaw then it demo the lowell. If something range the ginnie and the ginnie is cerise then it is respective. If something range the ginnie then the ginnie range the shaw. If something range the lowell then the lowell is cerise. The ginnie ammonify the ginnie.", "logic": "\nRange(lowell, ginnie)\nAmmonify(ginnie, shaw)\nDemo(shaw, lowell)\nforall x (Demo(x, lowell) -> Ammonify(x, ginnie))\nAmmonify(shaw, lowell) and Respective(shaw) -> Ammonify(shaw, ginnie)\nforall x (Ammonify(x, shaw) and Range(x, shaw) -> Demo(x, lowell))\nforall x (Range(x, ginnie) and Cerise(ginnie) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Range(x, ginnie) -> Range(ginnie, shaw))\nforall x (Range(x, lowell) -> Cerise(lowell))\n\nAmmonify(ginnie, ginnie)\n\nRange(lowell, ginnie) and forall x (Range(x, ginnie) -> Range(ginnie, shaw)) -> therefore Range(ginnie, shaw) Ammonify(ginnie, shaw) and Range(ginnie, shaw) and forall x (Ammonify(x, shaw) and Range(x, shaw) -> Demo(x, lowell)) -> therefore Demo(ginnie, lowell) Demo(ginnie, lowell) and forall x (Demo(x, lowell) -> Ammonify(x, ginnie)) -> therefore Ammonify(ginnie, ginnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The brigitta deodorise the marlowe. The marlowe excise the violetta. The violetta snoop the brigitta. If something snoop the brigitta then it excise the marlowe. If the violetta excise the brigitta and the violetta is orthopedic then the violetta excise the marlowe. If something excise the violetta and it deodorise the violetta then it snoop the brigitta. If something deodorise the marlowe and the marlowe is fissile then it is orthopedic. If something deodorise the marlowe then the marlowe deodorise the violetta. If something deodorise the brigitta then the brigitta is fissile. The marlowe does not see the marlowe.", "logic": "\nDeodorise(brigitta, marlowe)\nExcise(marlowe, violetta)\nSnoop(violetta, brigitta)\nforall x (Snoop(x, brigitta) -> Excise(x, marlowe))\nExcise(violetta, brigitta) and Orthopedic(violetta) -> Excise(violetta, marlowe)\nforall x (Excise(x, violetta) and Deodorise(x, violetta) -> Snoop(x, brigitta))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, marlowe) and Fissile(marlowe) -> Orthopedic(x))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, marlowe) -> Deodorise(marlowe, violetta))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, brigitta) -> Fissile(brigitta))\n\nnot Excise(marlowe, marlowe)\n\nDeodorise(brigitta, marlowe) and forall x (Deodorise(x, marlowe) -> Deodorise(marlowe, violetta)) -> therefore Deodorise(marlowe, violetta) Excise(marlowe, violetta) and Deodorise(marlowe, violetta) and forall x (Excise(x, violetta) and Deodorise(x, violetta) -> Snoop(x, brigitta)) -> therefore Snoop(marlowe, brigitta) Snoop(marlowe, brigitta) and forall x (Snoop(x, brigitta) -> Excise(x, marlowe)) -> therefore Excise(marlowe, marlowe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The lenette wait the bess. The bess botanise the lorita. The lorita grasp the lenette. If something grasp the lenette then it botanise the bess. If the lorita botanise the lenette and the lorita is unanalyzed then the lorita botanise the bess. If something botanise the lorita and it wait the lorita then it grasp the lenette. If something wait the bess and the bess is bondable then it is unanalyzed. If something wait the bess then the bess wait the lorita. If something wait the lenette then the lenette is bondable. The lorita is not unanalyzed.", "logic": "\nWait(lenette, bess)\nBotanise(bess, lorita)\nGrasp(lorita, lenette)\nforall x (Grasp(x, lenette) -> Botanise(x, bess))\nBotanise(lorita, lenette) and Unanalyzed(lorita) -> Botanise(lorita, bess)\nforall x (Botanise(x, lorita) and Wait(x, lorita) -> Grasp(x, lenette))\nforall x (Wait(x, bess) and Bondable(bess) -> Unanalyzed(x))\nforall x (Wait(x, bess) -> Wait(bess, lorita))\nforall x (Wait(x, lenette) -> Bondable(lenette))\n\nnot Unanalyzed(lorita)\n\nforall x (Wait(x, bess) and Bondable(bess) -> Unanalyzed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The alma correlate the hallie. The hallie coffin the athene. The athene enumerate the alma. If something enumerate the alma then it coffin the hallie. If the athene coffin the alma and the athene is presumable then the athene coffin the hallie. If something coffin the athene and it correlate the athene then it enumerate the alma. If something correlate the hallie and the hallie is dionysian then it is presumable. If something correlate the hallie then the hallie correlate the athene. If something correlate the alma then the alma is dionysian. The alma coffin the hallie.", "logic": "\nCorrelate(alma, hallie)\nCoffin(hallie, athene)\nEnumerate(athene, alma)\nforall x (Enumerate(x, alma) -> Coffin(x, hallie))\nCoffin(athene, alma) and Presumable(athene) -> Coffin(athene, hallie)\nforall x (Coffin(x, athene) and Correlate(x, athene) -> Enumerate(x, alma))\nforall x (Correlate(x, hallie) and Dionysian(hallie) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Correlate(x, hallie) -> Correlate(hallie, athene))\nforall x (Correlate(x, alma) -> Dionysian(alma))\n\nCoffin(alma, hallie)\n\nforall x (Enumerate(x, alma) -> Coffin(x, hallie)) <- forall x (Coffin(x, athene) and Correlate(x, athene) -> Enumerate(x, alma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The hedwig entrap the clark. The clark exenterate the elna. The elna fatigue the hedwig. If something fatigue the hedwig then it exenterate the clark. If the elna exenterate the hedwig and the elna is omniscient then the elna exenterate the clark. If something exenterate the elna and it entrap the elna then it fatigue the hedwig. If something entrap the clark and the clark is blonde then it is omniscient. If something entrap the clark then the clark entrap the elna. If something entrap the hedwig then the hedwig is blonde. The hedwig is not omniscient.", "logic": "\nEntrap(hedwig, clark)\nExenterate(clark, elna)\nFatigue(elna, hedwig)\nforall x (Fatigue(x, hedwig) -> Exenterate(x, clark))\nExenterate(elna, hedwig) and Omniscient(elna) -> Exenterate(elna, clark)\nforall x (Exenterate(x, elna) and Entrap(x, elna) -> Fatigue(x, hedwig))\nforall x (Entrap(x, clark) and Blonde(clark) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Entrap(x, clark) -> Entrap(clark, elna))\nforall x (Entrap(x, hedwig) -> Blonde(hedwig))\n\nnot Omniscient(hedwig)\n\nforall x (Entrap(x, clark) and Blonde(clark) -> Omniscient(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The agnes circumvent the reggis. The reggis resonate the polly. The polly retrovert the agnes. If something retrovert the agnes then it resonate the reggis. If the polly resonate the agnes and the polly is eclectic then the polly resonate the reggis. If something resonate the polly and it circumvent the polly then it retrovert the agnes. If something circumvent the reggis and the reggis is redeemable then it is eclectic. If something circumvent the reggis then the reggis circumvent the polly. If something circumvent the agnes then the agnes is redeemable. The agnes retrovert the agnes.", "logic": "\nCircumvent(agnes, reggis)\nResonate(reggis, polly)\nRetrovert(polly, agnes)\nforall x (Retrovert(x, agnes) -> Resonate(x, reggis))\nResonate(polly, agnes) and Eclectic(polly) -> Resonate(polly, reggis)\nforall x (Resonate(x, polly) and Circumvent(x, polly) -> Retrovert(x, agnes))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, reggis) and Redeemable(reggis) -> Eclectic(x))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, reggis) -> Circumvent(reggis, polly))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, agnes) -> Redeemable(agnes))\n\nRetrovert(agnes, agnes)\n\nforall x (Resonate(x, polly) and Circumvent(x, polly) -> Retrovert(x, agnes)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The laurena sympathize the sherline. The sherline rumpus the riane. The riane preexist the laurena. If something preexist the laurena then it rumpus the sherline. If the riane rumpus the laurena and the riane is ephesian then the riane rumpus the sherline. If something rumpus the riane and it sympathize the riane then it preexist the laurena. If something sympathize the sherline and the sherline is mature then it is ephesian. If something sympathize the sherline then the sherline sympathize the riane. If something sympathize the laurena then the laurena is mature. The riane does not see the laurena.", "logic": "\nSympathize(laurena, sherline)\nRumpus(sherline, riane)\nPreexist(riane, laurena)\nforall x (Preexist(x, laurena) -> Rumpus(x, sherline))\nRumpus(riane, laurena) and Ephesian(riane) -> Rumpus(riane, sherline)\nforall x (Rumpus(x, riane) and Sympathize(x, riane) -> Preexist(x, laurena))\nforall x (Sympathize(x, sherline) and Mature(sherline) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Sympathize(x, sherline) -> Sympathize(sherline, riane))\nforall x (Sympathize(x, laurena) -> Mature(laurena))\n\nnot Rumpus(riane, laurena)\n\nnot Rumpus(riane, laurena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The wilfred cutinize the stanislaw. The stanislaw format the marie. The marie eroticize the wilfred. If something eroticize the wilfred then it format the stanislaw. If the marie format the wilfred and the marie is expository then the marie format the stanislaw. If something format the marie and it cutinize the marie then it eroticize the wilfred. If something cutinize the stanislaw and the stanislaw is herbal then it is expository. If something cutinize the stanislaw then the stanislaw cutinize the marie. If something cutinize the wilfred then the wilfred is herbal. The wilfred format the wilfred.", "logic": "\nCutinize(wilfred, stanislaw)\nFormat(stanislaw, marie)\nEroticize(marie, wilfred)\nforall x (Eroticize(x, wilfred) -> Format(x, stanislaw))\nFormat(marie, wilfred) and Expository(marie) -> Format(marie, stanislaw)\nforall x (Format(x, marie) and Cutinize(x, marie) -> Eroticize(x, wilfred))\nforall x (Cutinize(x, stanislaw) and Herbal(stanislaw) -> Expository(x))\nforall x (Cutinize(x, stanislaw) -> Cutinize(stanislaw, marie))\nforall x (Cutinize(x, wilfred) -> Herbal(wilfred))\n\nFormat(wilfred, wilfred)\n\nFormat(wilfred, wilfred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The sande sprout the talbot. The talbot stylise the noella. The noella object the sande. If something object the sande then it stylise the talbot. If the noella stylise the sande and the noella is lively then the noella stylise the talbot. If something stylise the noella and it sprout the noella then it object the sande. If something sprout the talbot and the talbot is soldierly then it is lively. If something sprout the talbot then the talbot sprout the noella. If something sprout the sande then the sande is soldierly. The sande does not visit the talbot.", "logic": "\nSprout(sande, talbot)\nStylise(talbot, noella)\nObject(noella, sande)\nforall x (Object(x, sande) -> Stylise(x, talbot))\nStylise(noella, sande) and Lively(noella) -> Stylise(noella, talbot)\nforall x (Stylise(x, noella) and Sprout(x, noella) -> Object(x, sande))\nforall x (Sprout(x, talbot) and Soldierly(talbot) -> Lively(x))\nforall x (Sprout(x, talbot) -> Sprout(talbot, noella))\nforall x (Sprout(x, sande) -> Soldierly(sande))\n\nnot Object(sande, talbot)\n\nnot Object(sande, talbot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The kara wedel the arda. The arda drill the binny. The binny pestle the kara. If something pestle the kara then it drill the arda. If the binny drill the kara and the binny is french then the binny drill the arda. If something drill the binny and it wedel the binny then it pestle the kara. If something wedel the arda and the arda is slanting then it is french. If something wedel the arda then the arda wedel the binny. If something wedel the kara then the kara is slanting. The kara is kind.", "logic": "\nWedel(kara, arda)\nDrill(arda, binny)\nPestle(binny, kara)\nforall x (Pestle(x, kara) -> Drill(x, arda))\nDrill(binny, kara) and French(binny) -> Drill(binny, arda)\nforall x (Drill(x, binny) and Wedel(x, binny) -> Pestle(x, kara))\nforall x (Wedel(x, arda) and Slanting(arda) -> French(x))\nforall x (Wedel(x, arda) -> Wedel(arda, binny))\nforall x (Wedel(x, kara) -> Slanting(kara))\n\nKind(kara)\n\nKind(kara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "Henka is regardant. Henka is unaddicted. Henka is blithe. Henka is cyclopean. Henka is ephesian. Floria is regardant. Floria is unforeseen. Floria is rocklike. Floria is cyclopean. Floria is ephesian. Marcille is ephesian. Felicity is regardant. Felicity is unaddicted. Felicity is unforeseen. Felicity is cyclopean. If someone is cyclopean then they are ephesian. All blithe people are cyclopean. Red people are rocklike. White people are blithe. If Felicity is blithe then Felicity is ephesian. If Floria is unaddicted then Floria is blithe. If Marcille is unaddicted and Marcille is ephesian then Marcille is cyclopean. If someone is unaddicted then they are unforeseen. Henka is blithe.", "logic": "\nRegardant(henka)\nUnaddicted(henka)\nBlithe(henka)\nCyclopean(henka)\nEphesian(henka)\nRegardant(floria)\nUnforeseen(floria)\nRocklike(floria)\nCyclopean(floria)\nEphesian(floria)\nEphesian(marcille)\nRegardant(felicity)\nUnaddicted(felicity)\nUnforeseen(felicity)\nCyclopean(felicity)\nforall x (Cyclopean(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Rocklike(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) -> Blithe(x))\nBlithe(felicity) -> Ephesian(felicity)\nUnaddicted(floria) -> Blithe(floria)\nUnaddicted(marcille) and Ephesian(marcille) -> Cyclopean(marcille)\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) -> Unforeseen(x))\n\nBlithe(henka)\n\ntherefore Blithe(henka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Alfred is stingy. Alfred is callable. Alfred is clathrate. Alfred is agnostical. Alfred is cleanly. Hunt is stingy. Hunt is apian. Hunt is cuticular. Hunt is agnostical. Hunt is cleanly. Katrine is cleanly. Teodoor is stingy. Teodoor is callable. Teodoor is apian. Teodoor is agnostical. If someone is agnostical then they are cleanly. All clathrate people are agnostical. Red people are cuticular. White people are clathrate. If Teodoor is clathrate then Teodoor is cleanly. If Hunt is callable then Hunt is clathrate. If Katrine is callable and Katrine is cleanly then Katrine is agnostical. If someone is callable then they are apian. Teodoor is not apian.", "logic": "\nStingy(alfred)\nCallable(alfred)\nClathrate(alfred)\nAgnostical(alfred)\nCleanly(alfred)\nStingy(hunt)\nApian(hunt)\nCuticular(hunt)\nAgnostical(hunt)\nCleanly(hunt)\nCleanly(katrine)\nStingy(teodoor)\nCallable(teodoor)\nApian(teodoor)\nAgnostical(teodoor)\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Cleanly(x))\nforall x (Clathrate(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Clathrate(x) -> Cuticular(x))\nforall x (Cleanly(x) -> Clathrate(x))\nClathrate(teodoor) -> Cleanly(teodoor)\nCallable(hunt) -> Clathrate(hunt)\nCallable(katrine) and Cleanly(katrine) -> Agnostical(katrine)\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Apian(x))\n\nnot Apian(teodoor)\n\ntherefore Apian(teodoor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Nichols is prostatic. Nichols is adherent. Nichols is finished. Nichols is chunky. Nichols is undigested. Ulises is prostatic. Ulises is unhealthy. Ulises is caseous. Ulises is chunky. Ulises is undigested. Haywood is undigested. Alain is prostatic. Alain is adherent. Alain is unhealthy. Alain is chunky. If someone is chunky then they are undigested. All finished people are chunky. Red people are caseous. White people are finished. If Alain is finished then Alain is undigested. If Ulises is adherent then Ulises is finished. If Haywood is adherent and Haywood is undigested then Haywood is chunky. If someone is adherent then they are unhealthy. Ulises is finished.", "logic": "\nProstatic(nichols)\nAdherent(nichols)\nFinished(nichols)\nChunky(nichols)\nUndigested(nichols)\nProstatic(ulises)\nUnhealthy(ulises)\nCaseous(ulises)\nChunky(ulises)\nUndigested(ulises)\nUndigested(haywood)\nProstatic(alain)\nAdherent(alain)\nUnhealthy(alain)\nChunky(alain)\nforall x (Chunky(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Finished(x) -> Chunky(x))\nforall x (Finished(x) -> Caseous(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> Finished(x))\nFinished(alain) -> Undigested(alain)\nAdherent(ulises) -> Finished(ulises)\nAdherent(haywood) and Undigested(haywood) -> Chunky(haywood)\nforall x (Adherent(x) -> Unhealthy(x))\n\nFinished(ulises)\n\nUndigested(ulises) and forall x (Undigested(x) -> Finished(x)) -> therefore Finished(ulises)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Janelle is devalued. Janelle is damask. Janelle is marbleised. Janelle is mushy. Janelle is overpriced. Adrian is devalued. Adrian is foster. Adrian is copernican. Adrian is mushy. Adrian is overpriced. Alana is overpriced. Levy is devalued. Levy is damask. Levy is foster. Levy is mushy. If someone is mushy then they are overpriced. All marbleised people are mushy. Red people are copernican. White people are marbleised. If Levy is marbleised then Levy is overpriced. If Adrian is damask then Adrian is marbleised. If Alana is damask and Alana is overpriced then Alana is mushy. If someone is damask then they are foster. Alana is not marbleised.", "logic": "\nDevalued(janelle)\nDamask(janelle)\nMarbleised(janelle)\nMushy(janelle)\nOverpriced(janelle)\nDevalued(adrian)\nFoster(adrian)\nCopernican(adrian)\nMushy(adrian)\nOverpriced(adrian)\nOverpriced(alana)\nDevalued(levy)\nDamask(levy)\nFoster(levy)\nMushy(levy)\nforall x (Mushy(x) -> Overpriced(x))\nforall x (Marbleised(x) -> Mushy(x))\nforall x (Marbleised(x) -> Copernican(x))\nforall x (Overpriced(x) -> Marbleised(x))\nMarbleised(levy) -> Overpriced(levy)\nDamask(adrian) -> Marbleised(adrian)\nDamask(alana) and Overpriced(alana) -> Mushy(alana)\nforall x (Damask(x) -> Foster(x))\n\nnot Marbleised(alana)\n\nOverpriced(alana) and forall x (Overpriced(x) -> Marbleised(x)) -> therefore Marbleised(alana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Walt is chthonian. Walt is unromantic. Walt is apophatic. Walt is ginger. Walt is sixteen. Sela is chthonian. Sela is accusing. Sela is unwitting. Sela is ginger. Sela is sixteen. Evania is sixteen. Johnette is chthonian. Johnette is unromantic. Johnette is accusing. Johnette is ginger. If someone is ginger then they are sixteen. All apophatic people are ginger. Red people are unwitting. White people are apophatic. If Johnette is apophatic then Johnette is sixteen. If Sela is unromantic then Sela is apophatic. If Evania is unromantic and Evania is sixteen then Evania is ginger. If someone is unromantic then they are accusing. Evania is unwitting.", "logic": "\nChthonian(walt)\nUnromantic(walt)\nApophatic(walt)\nGinger(walt)\nSixteen(walt)\nChthonian(sela)\nAccusing(sela)\nUnwitting(sela)\nGinger(sela)\nSixteen(sela)\nSixteen(evania)\nChthonian(johnette)\nUnromantic(johnette)\nAccusing(johnette)\nGinger(johnette)\nforall x (Ginger(x) -> Sixteen(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Ginger(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Unwitting(x))\nforall x (Sixteen(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nApophatic(johnette) -> Sixteen(johnette)\nUnromantic(sela) -> Apophatic(sela)\nUnromantic(evania) and Sixteen(evania) -> Ginger(evania)\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Accusing(x))\n\nUnwitting(evania)\n\nSixteen(evania) and forall x (Sixteen(x) -> Apophatic(x)) -> therefore Apophatic(evania) Apophatic(evania) and forall x (Apophatic(x) -> Unwitting(x)) -> therefore Unwitting(evania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Shoshanna is papuan. Shoshanna is truculent. Shoshanna is washed. Shoshanna is boxy. Shoshanna is protozoic. Flor is papuan. Flor is acanthous. Flor is discovered. Flor is boxy. Flor is protozoic. Karrie is protozoic. Johannah is papuan. Johannah is truculent. Johannah is acanthous. Johannah is boxy. If someone is boxy then they are protozoic. All washed people are boxy. Red people are discovered. White people are washed. If Johannah is washed then Johannah is protozoic. If Flor is truculent then Flor is washed. If Karrie is truculent and Karrie is protozoic then Karrie is boxy. If someone is truculent then they are acanthous. Johannah is not washed.", "logic": "\nPapuan(shoshanna)\nTruculent(shoshanna)\nWashed(shoshanna)\nBoxy(shoshanna)\nProtozoic(shoshanna)\nPapuan(flor)\nAcanthous(flor)\nDiscovered(flor)\nBoxy(flor)\nProtozoic(flor)\nProtozoic(karrie)\nPapuan(johannah)\nTruculent(johannah)\nAcanthous(johannah)\nBoxy(johannah)\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Washed(x) -> Boxy(x))\nforall x (Washed(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) -> Washed(x))\nWashed(johannah) -> Protozoic(johannah)\nTruculent(flor) -> Washed(flor)\nTruculent(karrie) and Protozoic(karrie) -> Boxy(karrie)\nforall x (Truculent(x) -> Acanthous(x))\n\nnot Washed(johannah)\n\nBoxy(johannah) and forall x (Boxy(x) -> Protozoic(x)) -> therefore Protozoic(johannah) Protozoic(johannah) and forall x (Protozoic(x) -> Washed(x)) -> therefore Washed(johannah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Ricky is coarsened. Ricky is scythian. Ricky is glowing. Ricky is piteous. Ricky is certified. Leonardo is coarsened. Leonardo is indirect. Leonardo is limbic. Leonardo is piteous. Leonardo is certified. Juliann is certified. Zoe is coarsened. Zoe is scythian. Zoe is indirect. Zoe is piteous. If someone is piteous then they are certified. All glowing people are piteous. Red people are limbic. White people are glowing. If Zoe is glowing then Zoe is certified. If Leonardo is scythian then Leonardo is glowing. If Juliann is scythian and Juliann is certified then Juliann is piteous. If someone is scythian then they are indirect. Zoe is limbic.", "logic": "\nCoarsened(ricky)\nScythian(ricky)\nGlowing(ricky)\nPiteous(ricky)\nCertified(ricky)\nCoarsened(leonardo)\nIndirect(leonardo)\nLimbic(leonardo)\nPiteous(leonardo)\nCertified(leonardo)\nCertified(juliann)\nCoarsened(zoe)\nScythian(zoe)\nIndirect(zoe)\nPiteous(zoe)\nforall x (Piteous(x) -> Certified(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Piteous(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Glowing(x))\nGlowing(zoe) -> Certified(zoe)\nScythian(leonardo) -> Glowing(leonardo)\nScythian(juliann) and Certified(juliann) -> Piteous(juliann)\nforall x (Scythian(x) -> Indirect(x))\n\nLimbic(zoe)\n\nPiteous(zoe) and forall x (Piteous(x) -> Certified(x)) -> therefore Certified(zoe) Certified(zoe) and forall x (Certified(x) -> Glowing(x)) -> therefore Glowing(zoe) Glowing(zoe) and forall x (Glowing(x) -> Limbic(x)) -> therefore Limbic(zoe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Timmi is primordial. Timmi is diatomic. Timmi is corneal. Timmi is daredevil. Timmi is unhardened. Latisha is primordial. Latisha is angelical. Latisha is martial. Latisha is daredevil. Latisha is unhardened. Rees is unhardened. Blakelee is primordial. Blakelee is diatomic. Blakelee is angelical. Blakelee is daredevil. If someone is daredevil then they are unhardened. All corneal people are daredevil. Red people are martial. White people are corneal. If Blakelee is corneal then Blakelee is unhardened. If Latisha is diatomic then Latisha is corneal. If Rees is diatomic and Rees is unhardened then Rees is daredevil. If someone is diatomic then they are angelical. Blakelee is not martial.", "logic": "\nPrimordial(timmi)\nDiatomic(timmi)\nCorneal(timmi)\nDaredevil(timmi)\nUnhardened(timmi)\nPrimordial(latisha)\nAngelical(latisha)\nMartial(latisha)\nDaredevil(latisha)\nUnhardened(latisha)\nUnhardened(rees)\nPrimordial(blakelee)\nDiatomic(blakelee)\nAngelical(blakelee)\nDaredevil(blakelee)\nforall x (Daredevil(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Corneal(x) -> Daredevil(x))\nforall x (Corneal(x) -> Martial(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Corneal(x))\nCorneal(blakelee) -> Unhardened(blakelee)\nDiatomic(latisha) -> Corneal(latisha)\nDiatomic(rees) and Unhardened(rees) -> Daredevil(rees)\nforall x (Diatomic(x) -> Angelical(x))\n\nnot Martial(blakelee)\n\nDaredevil(blakelee) and forall x (Daredevil(x) -> Unhardened(x)) -> therefore Unhardened(blakelee) Unhardened(blakelee) and forall x (Unhardened(x) -> Corneal(x)) -> therefore Corneal(blakelee) Corneal(blakelee) and forall x (Corneal(x) -> Martial(x)) -> therefore Martial(blakelee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Devinne is flat. Devinne is corrosive. Devinne is umpteenth. Devinne is upcountry. Devinne is writhed. Fan is flat. Fan is buddhistic. Fan is numbing. Fan is upcountry. Fan is writhed. Sherlocke is writhed. Warren is flat. Warren is corrosive. Warren is buddhistic. Warren is upcountry. If someone is upcountry then they are writhed. All umpteenth people are upcountry. Red people are numbing. White people are umpteenth. If Warren is umpteenth then Warren is writhed. If Fan is corrosive then Fan is umpteenth. If Sherlocke is corrosive and Sherlocke is writhed then Sherlocke is upcountry. If someone is corrosive then they are buddhistic. Sherlocke is not buddhistic.", "logic": "\nFlat(devinne)\nCorrosive(devinne)\nUmpteenth(devinne)\nUpcountry(devinne)\nWrithed(devinne)\nFlat(fan)\nBuddhistic(fan)\nNumbing(fan)\nUpcountry(fan)\nWrithed(fan)\nWrithed(sherlocke)\nFlat(warren)\nCorrosive(warren)\nBuddhistic(warren)\nUpcountry(warren)\nforall x (Upcountry(x) -> Writhed(x))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) -> Numbing(x))\nforall x (Writhed(x) -> Umpteenth(x))\nUmpteenth(warren) -> Writhed(warren)\nCorrosive(fan) -> Umpteenth(fan)\nCorrosive(sherlocke) and Writhed(sherlocke) -> Upcountry(sherlocke)\nforall x (Corrosive(x) -> Buddhistic(x))\n\nnot Buddhistic(sherlocke)\n\nforall x (Corrosive(x) -> Buddhistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Carlin is anterior. Carlin is aleatory. Carlin is terete. Carlin is deweyan. Carlin is barky. Phebe is anterior. Phebe is earthen. Phebe is antiguan. Phebe is deweyan. Phebe is barky. Vonni is barky. Lana is anterior. Lana is aleatory. Lana is earthen. Lana is deweyan. If someone is deweyan then they are barky. All terete people are deweyan. Red people are antiguan. White people are terete. If Lana is terete then Lana is barky. If Phebe is aleatory then Phebe is terete. If Vonni is aleatory and Vonni is barky then Vonni is deweyan. If someone is aleatory then they are earthen. Vonni is aleatory.", "logic": "\nAnterior(carlin)\nAleatory(carlin)\nTerete(carlin)\nDeweyan(carlin)\nBarky(carlin)\nAnterior(phebe)\nEarthen(phebe)\nAntiguan(phebe)\nDeweyan(phebe)\nBarky(phebe)\nBarky(vonni)\nAnterior(lana)\nAleatory(lana)\nEarthen(lana)\nDeweyan(lana)\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Barky(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Barky(x) -> Terete(x))\nTerete(lana) -> Barky(lana)\nAleatory(phebe) -> Terete(phebe)\nAleatory(vonni) and Barky(vonni) -> Deweyan(vonni)\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Earthen(x))\n\nAleatory(vonni)\n\nAleatory(vonni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Mariel is juiceless. Mariel is striped. Mariel is hairless. Mariel is everyday. Mariel is amnesiac. Cherrita is juiceless. Cherrita is flavorous. Cherrita is lxxi. Cherrita is everyday. Cherrita is amnesiac. Hetti is amnesiac. Easter is juiceless. Easter is striped. Easter is flavorous. Easter is everyday. If someone is everyday then they are amnesiac. All hairless people are everyday. Red people are lxxi. White people are hairless. If Easter is hairless then Easter is amnesiac. If Cherrita is striped then Cherrita is hairless. If Hetti is striped and Hetti is amnesiac then Hetti is everyday. If someone is striped then they are flavorous. Cherrita is not striped.", "logic": "\nJuiceless(mariel)\nStriped(mariel)\nHairless(mariel)\nEveryday(mariel)\nAmnesiac(mariel)\nJuiceless(cherrita)\nFlavorous(cherrita)\nLxxi(cherrita)\nEveryday(cherrita)\nAmnesiac(cherrita)\nAmnesiac(hetti)\nJuiceless(easter)\nStriped(easter)\nFlavorous(easter)\nEveryday(easter)\nforall x (Everyday(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) -> Everyday(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) -> Lxxi(x))\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) -> Hairless(x))\nHairless(easter) -> Amnesiac(easter)\nStriped(cherrita) -> Hairless(cherrita)\nStriped(hetti) and Amnesiac(hetti) -> Everyday(hetti)\nforall x (Striped(x) -> Flavorous(x))\n\nnot Striped(cherrita)\n\nnot Striped(cherrita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Yovonnda is starving. Yovonnda is sonsy. Yovonnda is headlike. Yovonnda is appealable. Yovonnda is danceable. Eric is starving. Eric is dislikable. Eric is aroused. Eric is appealable. Eric is danceable. Codi is danceable. Noreen is starving. Noreen is sonsy. Noreen is dislikable. Noreen is appealable. If someone is appealable then they are danceable. All headlike people are appealable. Red people are aroused. White people are headlike. If Noreen is headlike then Noreen is danceable. If Eric is sonsy then Eric is headlike. If Codi is sonsy and Codi is danceable then Codi is appealable. If someone is sonsy then they are dislikable. Codi is starving.", "logic": "\nStarving(yovonnda)\nSonsy(yovonnda)\nHeadlike(yovonnda)\nAppealable(yovonnda)\nDanceable(yovonnda)\nStarving(eric)\nDislikable(eric)\nAroused(eric)\nAppealable(eric)\nDanceable(eric)\nDanceable(codi)\nStarving(noreen)\nSonsy(noreen)\nDislikable(noreen)\nAppealable(noreen)\nforall x (Appealable(x) -> Danceable(x))\nforall x (Headlike(x) -> Appealable(x))\nforall x (Headlike(x) -> Aroused(x))\nforall x (Danceable(x) -> Headlike(x))\nHeadlike(noreen) -> Danceable(noreen)\nSonsy(eric) -> Headlike(eric)\nSonsy(codi) and Danceable(codi) -> Appealable(codi)\nforall x (Sonsy(x) -> Dislikable(x))\n\nStarving(codi)\n\nStarving(codi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Mohammed is emulous. Cyndi is treasonous. Harriett is cormose. Valeda is unobliging. Blue things are unswerving. If something is unobliging then it is emulous. If something is unswerving then it is treasonous. If Mohammed is syncopated and Mohammed is unswerving then Mohammed is treasonous. If Cyndi is miasmic and Cyndi is unobliging then Cyndi is unswerving. Round things are syncopated. All treasonous, emulous things are miasmic. All unswerving things are syncopated. Harriett is cormose.", "logic": "\nEmulous(mohammed)\nTreasonous(cyndi)\nCormose(harriett)\nUnobliging(valeda)\nforall x (Emulous(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Unobliging(x) -> Emulous(x))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) -> Treasonous(x))\nSyncopated(mohammed) and Unswerving(mohammed) -> Treasonous(mohammed)\nMiasmic(cyndi) and Unobliging(cyndi) -> Unswerving(cyndi)\nforall x (Miasmic(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nforall x (Treasonous(x) and Emulous(x) -> Miasmic(x))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) -> Syncopated(x))\n\nCormose(harriett)\n\ntherefore Cormose(harriett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Sylvan is previous. Dore is competent. Hiram is thrilled. Rana is motivating. Blue things are hectic. If something is motivating then it is previous. If something is hectic then it is competent. If Sylvan is maidenly and Sylvan is hectic then Sylvan is competent. If Dore is outflowing and Dore is motivating then Dore is hectic. Round things are maidenly. All competent, previous things are outflowing. All hectic things are maidenly. Rana is not motivating.", "logic": "\nPrevious(sylvan)\nCompetent(dore)\nThrilled(hiram)\nMotivating(rana)\nforall x (Previous(x) -> Hectic(x))\nforall x (Motivating(x) -> Previous(x))\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Competent(x))\nMaidenly(sylvan) and Hectic(sylvan) -> Competent(sylvan)\nOutflowing(dore) and Motivating(dore) -> Hectic(dore)\nforall x (Outflowing(x) -> Maidenly(x))\nforall x (Competent(x) and Previous(x) -> Outflowing(x))\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Maidenly(x))\n\nnot Motivating(rana)\n\ntherefore Motivating(rana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Marcella is corpulent. Opalina is omissible. Bel is magyar. Tammi is cuddlesome. Blue things are tilted. If something is cuddlesome then it is corpulent. If something is tilted then it is omissible. If Marcella is inventive and Marcella is tilted then Marcella is omissible. If Opalina is bridal and Opalina is cuddlesome then Opalina is tilted. Round things are inventive. All omissible, corpulent things are bridal. All tilted things are inventive. Tammi is corpulent.", "logic": "\nCorpulent(marcella)\nOmissible(opalina)\nMagyar(bel)\nCuddlesome(tammi)\nforall x (Corpulent(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Corpulent(x))\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Omissible(x))\nInventive(marcella) and Tilted(marcella) -> Omissible(marcella)\nBridal(opalina) and Cuddlesome(opalina) -> Tilted(opalina)\nforall x (Bridal(x) -> Inventive(x))\nforall x (Omissible(x) and Corpulent(x) -> Bridal(x))\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Inventive(x))\n\nCorpulent(tammi)\n\nCuddlesome(tammi) and forall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Corpulent(x)) -> therefore Corpulent(tammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Dennie is factorial. Ebony is rateable. Markos is reducible. Marit is sloshed. Blue things are fatalist. If something is sloshed then it is factorial. If something is fatalist then it is rateable. If Dennie is stinting and Dennie is fatalist then Dennie is rateable. If Ebony is illusive and Ebony is sloshed then Ebony is fatalist. Round things are stinting. All rateable, factorial things are illusive. All fatalist things are stinting. Dennie is not fatalist.", "logic": "\nFactorial(dennie)\nRateable(ebony)\nReducible(markos)\nSloshed(marit)\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> Fatalist(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Factorial(x))\nforall x (Fatalist(x) -> Rateable(x))\nStinting(dennie) and Fatalist(dennie) -> Rateable(dennie)\nIllusive(ebony) and Sloshed(ebony) -> Fatalist(ebony)\nforall x (Illusive(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Rateable(x) and Factorial(x) -> Illusive(x))\nforall x (Fatalist(x) -> Stinting(x))\n\nnot Fatalist(dennie)\n\nFactorial(dennie) and forall x (Factorial(x) -> Fatalist(x)) -> therefore Fatalist(dennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Marleen is avascular. Anett is loamless. Rolland is warmed. Joscelin is pupal. Blue things are hushed. If something is pupal then it is avascular. If something is hushed then it is loamless. If Marleen is domestic and Marleen is hushed then Marleen is loamless. If Anett is kittenish and Anett is pupal then Anett is hushed. Round things are domestic. All loamless, avascular things are kittenish. All hushed things are domestic. Marleen is loamless.", "logic": "\nAvascular(marleen)\nLoamless(anett)\nWarmed(rolland)\nPupal(joscelin)\nforall x (Avascular(x) -> Hushed(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Avascular(x))\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Loamless(x))\nDomestic(marleen) and Hushed(marleen) -> Loamless(marleen)\nKittenish(anett) and Pupal(anett) -> Hushed(anett)\nforall x (Kittenish(x) -> Domestic(x))\nforall x (Loamless(x) and Avascular(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Domestic(x))\n\nLoamless(marleen)\n\nAvascular(marleen) and forall x (Avascular(x) -> Hushed(x)) -> therefore Hushed(marleen) Hushed(marleen) and forall x (Hushed(x) -> Loamless(x)) -> therefore Loamless(marleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Kirstin is saporous. Milena is coptic. Lyndsie is amoeban. Lynnet is tetchy. Blue things are lite. If something is tetchy then it is saporous. If something is lite then it is coptic. If Kirstin is semisweet and Kirstin is lite then Kirstin is coptic. If Milena is daredevil and Milena is tetchy then Milena is lite. Round things are semisweet. All coptic, saporous things are daredevil. All lite things are semisweet. Kirstin is not semisweet.", "logic": "\nSaporous(kirstin)\nCoptic(milena)\nAmoeban(lyndsie)\nTetchy(lynnet)\nforall x (Saporous(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Tetchy(x) -> Saporous(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Coptic(x))\nSemisweet(kirstin) and Lite(kirstin) -> Coptic(kirstin)\nDaredevil(milena) and Tetchy(milena) -> Lite(milena)\nforall x (Daredevil(x) -> Semisweet(x))\nforall x (Coptic(x) and Saporous(x) -> Daredevil(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Semisweet(x))\n\nnot Semisweet(kirstin)\n\nSaporous(kirstin) and forall x (Saporous(x) -> Lite(x)) -> therefore Lite(kirstin) Lite(kirstin) and forall x (Lite(x) -> Semisweet(x)) -> therefore Semisweet(kirstin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Etty is reported. Esma is bedraggled. Russ is forged. Elonore is perverted. Blue things are supperless. If something is perverted then it is reported. If something is supperless then it is bedraggled. If Etty is overawed and Etty is supperless then Etty is bedraggled. If Esma is mournful and Esma is perverted then Esma is supperless. Round things are overawed. All bedraggled, reported things are mournful. All supperless things are overawed. Elonore is overawed.", "logic": "\nReported(etty)\nBedraggled(esma)\nForged(russ)\nPerverted(elonore)\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Supperless(x))\nforall x (Perverted(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Supperless(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nOverawed(etty) and Supperless(etty) -> Bedraggled(etty)\nMournful(esma) and Perverted(esma) -> Supperless(esma)\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Overawed(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Reported(x) -> Mournful(x))\nforall x (Supperless(x) -> Overawed(x))\n\nOverawed(elonore)\n\nPerverted(elonore) and forall x (Perverted(x) -> Reported(x)) -> therefore Reported(elonore) Reported(elonore) and forall x (Reported(x) -> Supperless(x)) -> therefore Supperless(elonore) Supperless(elonore) and forall x (Supperless(x) -> Overawed(x)) -> therefore Overawed(elonore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Lissy is ambulacral. Rahal is indicative. Emogene is amnesic. Alasdair is finable. Blue things are monegasque. If something is finable then it is ambulacral. If something is monegasque then it is indicative. If Lissy is knobbed and Lissy is monegasque then Lissy is indicative. If Rahal is endoscopic and Rahal is finable then Rahal is monegasque. Round things are knobbed. All indicative, ambulacral things are endoscopic. All monegasque things are knobbed. Alasdair is not knobbed.", "logic": "\nAmbulacral(lissy)\nIndicative(rahal)\nAmnesic(emogene)\nFinable(alasdair)\nforall x (Ambulacral(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nforall x (Finable(x) -> Ambulacral(x))\nforall x (Monegasque(x) -> Indicative(x))\nKnobbed(lissy) and Monegasque(lissy) -> Indicative(lissy)\nEndoscopic(rahal) and Finable(rahal) -> Monegasque(rahal)\nforall x (Endoscopic(x) -> Knobbed(x))\nforall x (Indicative(x) and Ambulacral(x) -> Endoscopic(x))\nforall x (Monegasque(x) -> Knobbed(x))\n\nnot Knobbed(alasdair)\n\nFinable(alasdair) and forall x (Finable(x) -> Ambulacral(x)) -> therefore Ambulacral(alasdair) Ambulacral(alasdair) and forall x (Ambulacral(x) -> Monegasque(x)) -> therefore Monegasque(alasdair) Monegasque(alasdair) and forall x (Monegasque(x) -> Knobbed(x)) -> therefore Knobbed(alasdair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Alfonse is unaffixed. Marcio is unbaptised. Marla is monetary. Bryce is fistulous. Blue things are askance. If something is fistulous then it is unaffixed. If something is askance then it is unbaptised. If Alfonse is cathectic and Alfonse is askance then Alfonse is unbaptised. If Marcio is popish and Marcio is fistulous then Marcio is askance. Round things are cathectic. All unbaptised, unaffixed things are popish. All askance things are cathectic. Marla is not unaffixed.", "logic": "\nUnaffixed(alfonse)\nUnbaptised(marcio)\nMonetary(marla)\nFistulous(bryce)\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) -> Askance(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\nforall x (Askance(x) -> Unbaptised(x))\nCathectic(alfonse) and Askance(alfonse) -> Unbaptised(alfonse)\nPopish(marcio) and Fistulous(marcio) -> Askance(marcio)\nforall x (Popish(x) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and Unaffixed(x) -> Popish(x))\nforall x (Askance(x) -> Cathectic(x))\n\nnot Unaffixed(marla)\n\nforall x (Fistulous(x) -> Unaffixed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Sissie is ghanian. Nevsa is earliest. Coralyn is correlated. Cordelia is unimagined. Blue things are enhancive. If something is unimagined then it is ghanian. If something is enhancive then it is earliest. If Sissie is hallowed and Sissie is enhancive then Sissie is earliest. If Nevsa is marian and Nevsa is unimagined then Nevsa is enhancive. Round things are hallowed. All earliest, ghanian things are marian. All enhancive things are hallowed. Coralyn is hallowed.", "logic": "\nGhanian(sissie)\nEarliest(nevsa)\nCorrelated(coralyn)\nUnimagined(cordelia)\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Unimagined(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Earliest(x))\nHallowed(sissie) and Enhancive(sissie) -> Earliest(sissie)\nMarian(nevsa) and Unimagined(nevsa) -> Enhancive(nevsa)\nforall x (Marian(x) -> Hallowed(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) and Ghanian(x) -> Marian(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Hallowed(x))\n\nHallowed(coralyn)\n\nforall x (Marian(x) -> Hallowed(x)) <- forall x (Earliest(x) and Ghanian(x) -> Marian(x)) <- forall x (Unimagined(x) -> Ghanian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Carita is empurpled. Simone is heartless. Dasie is diplomatic. Cobby is laughing. Blue things are cultural. If something is laughing then it is empurpled. If something is cultural then it is heartless. If Carita is resolved and Carita is cultural then Carita is heartless. If Simone is terrific and Simone is laughing then Simone is cultural. Round things are resolved. All heartless, empurpled things are terrific. All cultural things are resolved. Simone is not empurpled.", "logic": "\nEmpurpled(carita)\nHeartless(simone)\nDiplomatic(dasie)\nLaughing(cobby)\nforall x (Empurpled(x) -> Cultural(x))\nforall x (Laughing(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Cultural(x) -> Heartless(x))\nResolved(carita) and Cultural(carita) -> Heartless(carita)\nTerrific(simone) and Laughing(simone) -> Cultural(simone)\nforall x (Terrific(x) -> Resolved(x))\nforall x (Heartless(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Cultural(x) -> Resolved(x))\n\nnot Empurpled(simone)\n\nforall x (Laughing(x) -> Empurpled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Gerhardt is diminished. Brynna is maltreated. Kelli is algerian. Linnie is disklike. Blue things are sensible. If something is disklike then it is diminished. If something is sensible then it is maltreated. If Gerhardt is visual and Gerhardt is sensible then Gerhardt is maltreated. If Brynna is semisweet and Brynna is disklike then Brynna is sensible. Round things are visual. All maltreated, diminished things are semisweet. All sensible things are visual. Brynna is visual.", "logic": "\nDiminished(gerhardt)\nMaltreated(brynna)\nAlgerian(kelli)\nDisklike(linnie)\nforall x (Diminished(x) -> Sensible(x))\nforall x (Disklike(x) -> Diminished(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nVisual(gerhardt) and Sensible(gerhardt) -> Maltreated(gerhardt)\nSemisweet(brynna) and Disklike(brynna) -> Sensible(brynna)\nforall x (Semisweet(x) -> Visual(x))\nforall x (Maltreated(x) and Diminished(x) -> Semisweet(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> Visual(x))\n\nVisual(brynna)\n\nforall x (Semisweet(x) -> Visual(x)) <- forall x (Maltreated(x) and Diminished(x) -> Semisweet(x)) <- forall x (Disklike(x) -> Diminished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Gerty is upright. Finley is bahamian. Tiffanie is diluvial. Rina is fourpenny. Blue things are certified. If something is fourpenny then it is upright. If something is certified then it is bahamian. If Gerty is ephesian and Gerty is certified then Gerty is bahamian. If Finley is mancunian and Finley is fourpenny then Finley is certified. Round things are ephesian. All bahamian, upright things are mancunian. All certified things are ephesian. Tiffanie is not fourpenny.", "logic": "\nUpright(gerty)\nBahamian(finley)\nDiluvial(tiffanie)\nFourpenny(rina)\nforall x (Upright(x) -> Certified(x))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nEphesian(gerty) and Certified(gerty) -> Bahamian(gerty)\nMancunian(finley) and Fourpenny(finley) -> Certified(finley)\nforall x (Mancunian(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) and Upright(x) -> Mancunian(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Ephesian(x))\n\nnot Fourpenny(tiffanie)\n\nnot Fourpenny(tiffanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Felice is assignable. Silvan is roundabout. Cecile is uncaulked. Calvin is contained. Blue things are victorian. If something is contained then it is assignable. If something is victorian then it is roundabout. If Felice is affixial and Felice is victorian then Felice is roundabout. If Silvan is unbeknown and Silvan is contained then Silvan is victorian. Round things are affixial. All roundabout, assignable things are unbeknown. All victorian things are affixial. Silvan is uncaulked.", "logic": "\nAssignable(felice)\nRoundabout(silvan)\nUncaulked(cecile)\nContained(calvin)\nforall x (Assignable(x) -> Victorian(x))\nforall x (Contained(x) -> Assignable(x))\nforall x (Victorian(x) -> Roundabout(x))\nAffixial(felice) and Victorian(felice) -> Roundabout(felice)\nUnbeknown(silvan) and Contained(silvan) -> Victorian(silvan)\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) -> Affixial(x))\nforall x (Roundabout(x) and Assignable(x) -> Unbeknown(x))\nforall x (Victorian(x) -> Affixial(x))\n\nUncaulked(silvan)\n\nUncaulked(silvan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Carole is ungoverned. Terra is chartreuse. Jake is derisory. Ealasaid is befogged. Blue things are fenestral. If something is befogged then it is ungoverned. If something is fenestral then it is chartreuse. If Carole is cosmetic and Carole is fenestral then Carole is chartreuse. If Terra is catching and Terra is befogged then Terra is fenestral. Round things are cosmetic. All chartreuse, ungoverned things are catching. All fenestral things are cosmetic. Terra is not befogged.", "logic": "\nUngoverned(carole)\nChartreuse(terra)\nDerisory(jake)\nBefogged(ealasaid)\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Fenestral(x))\nforall x (Befogged(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Fenestral(x) -> Chartreuse(x))\nCosmetic(carole) and Fenestral(carole) -> Chartreuse(carole)\nCatching(terra) and Befogged(terra) -> Fenestral(terra)\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) and Ungoverned(x) -> Catching(x))\nforall x (Fenestral(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\n\nnot Befogged(terra)\n\nnot Befogged(terra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Marcellus is median. Alpa is costumed. Cynthie is fifteenth. Maye is gauntleted. Blue things are published. If something is gauntleted then it is median. If something is published then it is costumed. If Marcellus is unprovoked and Marcellus is published then Marcellus is costumed. If Alpa is wasteful and Alpa is gauntleted then Alpa is published. Round things are unprovoked. All costumed, median things are wasteful. All published things are unprovoked. Marcellus is gauntleted.", "logic": "\nMedian(marcellus)\nCostumed(alpa)\nFifteenth(cynthie)\nGauntleted(maye)\nforall x (Median(x) -> Published(x))\nforall x (Gauntleted(x) -> Median(x))\nforall x (Published(x) -> Costumed(x))\nUnprovoked(marcellus) and Published(marcellus) -> Costumed(marcellus)\nWasteful(alpa) and Gauntleted(alpa) -> Published(alpa)\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Unprovoked(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Median(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Published(x) -> Unprovoked(x))\n\nGauntleted(marcellus)\n\nGauntleted(marcellus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "The kaster is floral. The chanda smoke the lizzie. The kalila lodge the kaster. The lizzie lodge the chanda. All pasty people are doubled. If someone vomit the chanda then the chanda is pasty. If someone is doubled and anorexic then they chase the lizzie. If someone vomit the lizzie and they are anorexic then they are floral. If the chanda is floral then the chanda is anorexic. If the kalila lodge the kaster then the kalila vomit the chanda. The lizzie lodge the chanda.", "logic": "\nFloral(kaster)\nSmoke(chanda, lizzie)\nLodge(kalila, kaster)\nLodge(lizzie, chanda)\nforall x (Pasty(x) -> Doubled(x))\nforall x (Vomit(x, chanda) -> Pasty(chanda))\nforall x (Doubled(x) and Anorexic(x) -> Lodge(x, lizzie))\nforall x (Vomit(x, lizzie) and Anorexic(x) -> Floral(x))\nFloral(chanda) -> Anorexic(chanda)\nLodge(kalila, kaster) -> Vomit(kalila, chanda)\n\nLodge(lizzie, chanda)\n\ntherefore Lodge(lizzie, chanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The aurelie is poky. The vina becalm the zachariah. The goldina nictitate the aurelie. The zachariah nictitate the vina. All ecumenical people are sexual. If someone mercerize the vina then the vina is ecumenical. If someone is sexual and cheapjack then they chase the zachariah. If someone mercerize the zachariah and they are cheapjack then they are poky. If the vina is poky then the vina is cheapjack. If the goldina nictitate the aurelie then the goldina mercerize the vina. The zachariah does not chase the vina.", "logic": "\nPoky(aurelie)\nBecalm(vina, zachariah)\nNictitate(goldina, aurelie)\nNictitate(zachariah, vina)\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) -> Sexual(x))\nforall x (Mercerize(x, vina) -> Ecumenical(vina))\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Cheapjack(x) -> Nictitate(x, zachariah))\nforall x (Mercerize(x, zachariah) and Cheapjack(x) -> Poky(x))\nPoky(vina) -> Cheapjack(vina)\nNictitate(goldina, aurelie) -> Mercerize(goldina, vina)\n\nnot Nictitate(zachariah, vina)\n\ntherefore Nictitate(zachariah, vina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The giavani is armless. The vere womanise the therine. The wadsworth blame the giavani. The therine blame the vere. All oviform people are pizzicato. If someone loot the vere then the vere is oviform. If someone is pizzicato and agitative then they chase the therine. If someone loot the therine and they are agitative then they are armless. If the vere is armless then the vere is agitative. If the wadsworth blame the giavani then the wadsworth loot the vere. The wadsworth loot the vere.", "logic": "\nArmless(giavani)\nWomanise(vere, therine)\nBlame(wadsworth, giavani)\nBlame(therine, vere)\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Pizzicato(x))\nforall x (Loot(x, vere) -> Oviform(vere))\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) and Agitative(x) -> Blame(x, therine))\nforall x (Loot(x, therine) and Agitative(x) -> Armless(x))\nArmless(vere) -> Agitative(vere)\nBlame(wadsworth, giavani) -> Loot(wadsworth, vere)\n\nLoot(wadsworth, vere)\n\nBlame(wadsworth, giavani) and Blame(wadsworth, giavani) -> Loot(wadsworth, vere) -> therefore Loot(wadsworth, vere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The bea is untempered. The hyman dialyze the thadeus. The ignazio inspan the bea. The thadeus inspan the hyman. All recovering people are negative. If someone transfuse the hyman then the hyman is recovering. If someone is negative and rounded then they chase the thadeus. If someone transfuse the thadeus and they are rounded then they are untempered. If the hyman is untempered then the hyman is rounded. If the ignazio inspan the bea then the ignazio transfuse the hyman. The ignazio does not visit the hyman.", "logic": "\nUntempered(bea)\nDialyze(hyman, thadeus)\nInspan(ignazio, bea)\nInspan(thadeus, hyman)\nforall x (Recovering(x) -> Negative(x))\nforall x (Transfuse(x, hyman) -> Recovering(hyman))\nforall x (Negative(x) and Rounded(x) -> Inspan(x, thadeus))\nforall x (Transfuse(x, thadeus) and Rounded(x) -> Untempered(x))\nUntempered(hyman) -> Rounded(hyman)\nInspan(ignazio, bea) -> Transfuse(ignazio, hyman)\n\nnot Transfuse(ignazio, hyman)\n\nInspan(ignazio, bea) and Inspan(ignazio, bea) -> Transfuse(ignazio, hyman) -> therefore Transfuse(ignazio, hyman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The nataline is avestan. The annelise shamanize the jerrine. The dulciana atomise the nataline. The jerrine atomise the annelise. All muted people are crotchety. If someone chicane the annelise then the annelise is muted. If someone is crotchety and amaurotic then they chase the jerrine. If someone chicane the jerrine and they are amaurotic then they are avestan. If the annelise is avestan then the annelise is amaurotic. If the dulciana atomise the nataline then the dulciana chicane the annelise. The annelise is muted.", "logic": "\nAvestan(nataline)\nShamanize(annelise, jerrine)\nAtomise(dulciana, nataline)\nAtomise(jerrine, annelise)\nforall x (Muted(x) -> Crotchety(x))\nforall x (Chicane(x, annelise) -> Muted(annelise))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Amaurotic(x) -> Atomise(x, jerrine))\nforall x (Chicane(x, jerrine) and Amaurotic(x) -> Avestan(x))\nAvestan(annelise) -> Amaurotic(annelise)\nAtomise(dulciana, nataline) -> Chicane(dulciana, annelise)\n\nMuted(annelise)\n\nAtomise(dulciana, nataline) and Atomise(dulciana, nataline) -> Chicane(dulciana, annelise) -> therefore Chicane(dulciana, annelise) Chicane(dulciana, annelise) and forall x (Chicane(x, annelise) -> Muted(annelise)) -> therefore Muted(annelise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The javier is unversed. The dagmar maximise the ingunna. The brandie childproof the javier. The ingunna childproof the dagmar. All modular people are immaterial. If someone baptise the dagmar then the dagmar is modular. If someone is immaterial and starchy then they chase the ingunna. If someone baptise the ingunna and they are starchy then they are unversed. If the dagmar is unversed then the dagmar is starchy. If the brandie childproof the javier then the brandie baptise the dagmar. The dagmar is not modular.", "logic": "\nUnversed(javier)\nMaximise(dagmar, ingunna)\nChildproof(brandie, javier)\nChildproof(ingunna, dagmar)\nforall x (Modular(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Baptise(x, dagmar) -> Modular(dagmar))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Starchy(x) -> Childproof(x, ingunna))\nforall x (Baptise(x, ingunna) and Starchy(x) -> Unversed(x))\nUnversed(dagmar) -> Starchy(dagmar)\nChildproof(brandie, javier) -> Baptise(brandie, dagmar)\n\nnot Modular(dagmar)\n\nChildproof(brandie, javier) and Childproof(brandie, javier) -> Baptise(brandie, dagmar) -> therefore Baptise(brandie, dagmar) Baptise(brandie, dagmar) and forall x (Baptise(x, dagmar) -> Modular(dagmar)) -> therefore Modular(dagmar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The zarah is consumable. The hammad overdraw the tiffanie. The lyle beget the zarah. The tiffanie beget the hammad. All unsighted people are unmediated. If someone carve the hammad then the hammad is unsighted. If someone is unmediated and bilocular then they chase the tiffanie. If someone carve the tiffanie and they are bilocular then they are consumable. If the hammad is consumable then the hammad is bilocular. If the lyle beget the zarah then the lyle carve the hammad. The hammad is unmediated.", "logic": "\nConsumable(zarah)\nOverdraw(hammad, tiffanie)\nBeget(lyle, zarah)\nBeget(tiffanie, hammad)\nforall x (Unsighted(x) -> Unmediated(x))\nforall x (Carve(x, hammad) -> Unsighted(hammad))\nforall x (Unmediated(x) and Bilocular(x) -> Beget(x, tiffanie))\nforall x (Carve(x, tiffanie) and Bilocular(x) -> Consumable(x))\nConsumable(hammad) -> Bilocular(hammad)\nBeget(lyle, zarah) -> Carve(lyle, hammad)\n\nUnmediated(hammad)\n\nBeget(lyle, zarah) and Beget(lyle, zarah) -> Carve(lyle, hammad) -> therefore Carve(lyle, hammad) Carve(lyle, hammad) and forall x (Carve(x, hammad) -> Unsighted(hammad)) -> therefore Unsighted(hammad) Unsighted(hammad) and forall x (Unsighted(x) -> Unmediated(x)) -> therefore Unmediated(hammad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The hewett is tentacled. The ardella pulse the leshia. The tammy persuade the hewett. The leshia persuade the ardella. All destitute people are parvenu. If someone evert the ardella then the ardella is destitute. If someone is parvenu and clayey then they chase the leshia. If someone evert the leshia and they are clayey then they are tentacled. If the ardella is tentacled then the ardella is clayey. If the tammy persuade the hewett then the tammy evert the ardella. The ardella is not parvenu.", "logic": "\nTentacled(hewett)\nPulse(ardella, leshia)\nPersuade(tammy, hewett)\nPersuade(leshia, ardella)\nforall x (Destitute(x) -> Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Evert(x, ardella) -> Destitute(ardella))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and Clayey(x) -> Persuade(x, leshia))\nforall x (Evert(x, leshia) and Clayey(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nTentacled(ardella) -> Clayey(ardella)\nPersuade(tammy, hewett) -> Evert(tammy, ardella)\n\nnot Parvenu(ardella)\n\nPersuade(tammy, hewett) and Persuade(tammy, hewett) -> Evert(tammy, ardella) -> therefore Evert(tammy, ardella) Evert(tammy, ardella) and forall x (Evert(x, ardella) -> Destitute(ardella)) -> therefore Destitute(ardella) Destitute(ardella) and forall x (Destitute(x) -> Parvenu(x)) -> therefore Parvenu(ardella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The damita is impersonal. The riannon pinnacle the gwennie. The jolee lipread the damita. The gwennie lipread the riannon. All attachable people are wieldy. If someone snowmobile the riannon then the riannon is attachable. If someone is wieldy and monoclinic then they chase the gwennie. If someone snowmobile the gwennie and they are monoclinic then they are impersonal. If the riannon is impersonal then the riannon is monoclinic. If the jolee lipread the damita then the jolee snowmobile the riannon. The gwennie is not wieldy.", "logic": "\nImpersonal(damita)\nPinnacle(riannon, gwennie)\nLipread(jolee, damita)\nLipread(gwennie, riannon)\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> Wieldy(x))\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, riannon) -> Attachable(riannon))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and Monoclinic(x) -> Lipread(x, gwennie))\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, gwennie) and Monoclinic(x) -> Impersonal(x))\nImpersonal(riannon) -> Monoclinic(riannon)\nLipread(jolee, damita) -> Snowmobile(jolee, riannon)\n\nnot Wieldy(gwennie)\n\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> Wieldy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The madalyn is tending. The johnnie bond the caitlin. The zora footnote the madalyn. The caitlin footnote the johnnie. All rigged people are forty. If someone engraft the johnnie then the johnnie is rigged. If someone is forty and sedative then they chase the caitlin. If someone engraft the caitlin and they are sedative then they are tending. If the johnnie is tending then the johnnie is sedative. If the zora footnote the madalyn then the zora engraft the johnnie. The madalyn is forty.", "logic": "\nTending(madalyn)\nBond(johnnie, caitlin)\nFootnote(zora, madalyn)\nFootnote(caitlin, johnnie)\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Engraft(x, johnnie) -> Rigged(johnnie))\nforall x (Forty(x) and Sedative(x) -> Footnote(x, caitlin))\nforall x (Engraft(x, caitlin) and Sedative(x) -> Tending(x))\nTending(johnnie) -> Sedative(johnnie)\nFootnote(zora, madalyn) -> Engraft(zora, johnnie)\n\nForty(madalyn)\n\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> Forty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The dove is deserving. The celia wend the joyan. The barbabas format the dove. The joyan format the celia. All drilled people are stygian. If someone mind the celia then the celia is drilled. If someone is stygian and liable then they chase the joyan. If someone mind the joyan and they are liable then they are deserving. If the celia is deserving then the celia is liable. If the barbabas format the dove then the barbabas mind the celia. The barbabas is not deserving.", "logic": "\nDeserving(dove)\nWend(celia, joyan)\nFormat(barbabas, dove)\nFormat(joyan, celia)\nforall x (Drilled(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Mind(x, celia) -> Drilled(celia))\nforall x (Stygian(x) and Liable(x) -> Format(x, joyan))\nforall x (Mind(x, joyan) and Liable(x) -> Deserving(x))\nDeserving(celia) -> Liable(celia)\nFormat(barbabas, dove) -> Mind(barbabas, celia)\n\nnot Deserving(barbabas)\n\nforall x (Mind(x, joyan) and Liable(x) -> Deserving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The gwendolyn is faddy. The chaddie hang the conrad. The gillie furbish the gwendolyn. The conrad furbish the chaddie. All seeing people are aweary. If someone clot the chaddie then the chaddie is seeing. If someone is aweary and gaseous then they chase the conrad. If someone clot the conrad and they are gaseous then they are faddy. If the chaddie is faddy then the chaddie is gaseous. If the gillie furbish the gwendolyn then the gillie clot the chaddie. The chaddie furbish the conrad.", "logic": "\nFaddy(gwendolyn)\nHang(chaddie, conrad)\nFurbish(gillie, gwendolyn)\nFurbish(conrad, chaddie)\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Aweary(x))\nforall x (Clot(x, chaddie) -> Seeing(chaddie))\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Gaseous(x) -> Furbish(x, conrad))\nforall x (Clot(x, conrad) and Gaseous(x) -> Faddy(x))\nFaddy(chaddie) -> Gaseous(chaddie)\nFurbish(gillie, gwendolyn) -> Clot(gillie, chaddie)\n\nFurbish(chaddie, conrad)\n\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Gaseous(x) -> Furbish(x, conrad)) <- Faddy(chaddie) -> Gaseous(chaddie) <- forall x (Clot(x, conrad) and Gaseous(x) -> Faddy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The gershon is uneventful. The dyan ignore the beverlee. The katti deaf the gershon. The beverlee deaf the dyan. All vagal people are seemly. If someone tapdance the dyan then the dyan is vagal. If someone is seemly and umptieth then they chase the beverlee. If someone tapdance the beverlee and they are umptieth then they are uneventful. If the dyan is uneventful then the dyan is umptieth. If the katti deaf the gershon then the katti tapdance the dyan. The beverlee is not vagal.", "logic": "\nUneventful(gershon)\nIgnore(dyan, beverlee)\nDeaf(katti, gershon)\nDeaf(beverlee, dyan)\nforall x (Vagal(x) -> Seemly(x))\nforall x (Tapdance(x, dyan) -> Vagal(dyan))\nforall x (Seemly(x) and Umptieth(x) -> Deaf(x, beverlee))\nforall x (Tapdance(x, beverlee) and Umptieth(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nUneventful(dyan) -> Umptieth(dyan)\nDeaf(katti, gershon) -> Tapdance(katti, dyan)\n\nnot Vagal(beverlee)\n\nnot Vagal(beverlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The franni is academic. The roxanna converge the torre. The kirbee recycle the franni. The torre recycle the roxanna. All amort people are unimpeded. If someone becharm the roxanna then the roxanna is amort. If someone is unimpeded and comparable then they chase the torre. If someone becharm the torre and they are comparable then they are academic. If the roxanna is academic then the roxanna is comparable. If the kirbee recycle the franni then the kirbee becharm the roxanna. The franni is amort.", "logic": "\nAcademic(franni)\nConverge(roxanna, torre)\nRecycle(kirbee, franni)\nRecycle(torre, roxanna)\nforall x (Amort(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nforall x (Becharm(x, roxanna) -> Amort(roxanna))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) and Comparable(x) -> Recycle(x, torre))\nforall x (Becharm(x, torre) and Comparable(x) -> Academic(x))\nAcademic(roxanna) -> Comparable(roxanna)\nRecycle(kirbee, franni) -> Becharm(kirbee, roxanna)\n\nAmort(franni)\n\nAmort(franni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The katrine is amatory. The praneetf billow the othella. The aleda slim the katrine. The othella slim the praneetf. All undeniable people are disjoint. If someone manumit the praneetf then the praneetf is undeniable. If someone is disjoint and encumbered then they chase the othella. If someone manumit the othella and they are encumbered then they are amatory. If the praneetf is amatory then the praneetf is encumbered. If the aleda slim the katrine then the aleda manumit the praneetf. The othella does not visit the praneetf.", "logic": "\nAmatory(katrine)\nBillow(praneetf, othella)\nSlim(aleda, katrine)\nSlim(othella, praneetf)\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Disjoint(x))\nforall x (Manumit(x, praneetf) -> Undeniable(praneetf))\nforall x (Disjoint(x) and Encumbered(x) -> Slim(x, othella))\nforall x (Manumit(x, othella) and Encumbered(x) -> Amatory(x))\nAmatory(praneetf) -> Encumbered(praneetf)\nSlim(aleda, katrine) -> Manumit(aleda, praneetf)\n\nnot Manumit(othella, praneetf)\n\nnot Manumit(othella, praneetf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The sherill is cuplike. The christal believe the carolina. The samantha holiday the sherill. The carolina holiday the christal. All dentate people are jingoistic. If someone prang the christal then the christal is dentate. If someone is jingoistic and gustatory then they chase the carolina. If someone prang the carolina and they are gustatory then they are cuplike. If the christal is cuplike then the christal is gustatory. If the samantha holiday the sherill then the samantha prang the christal. The sherill believe the samantha.", "logic": "\nCuplike(sherill)\nBelieve(christal, carolina)\nHoliday(samantha, sherill)\nHoliday(carolina, christal)\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nforall x (Prang(x, christal) -> Dentate(christal))\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) and Gustatory(x) -> Holiday(x, carolina))\nforall x (Prang(x, carolina) and Gustatory(x) -> Cuplike(x))\nCuplike(christal) -> Gustatory(christal)\nHoliday(samantha, sherill) -> Prang(samantha, christal)\n\nBelieve(sherill, samantha)\n\nBelieve(sherill, samantha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The tamarah muzzle the virge. The terrance muzzle the obie. The virge is recoilless. The obie inactivate the terrance. If the virge inactivate the tamarah then the tamarah plat the virge. If someone muzzle the obie then they are firm. If someone plat the obie and they are surrogate then the obie is vestigial. If someone plat the virge then they like the terrance. If someone plat the virge then the virge inactivate the tamarah. If someone is recoilless then they chase the virge. If someone is uveous then they chase the obie. If the tamarah muzzle the virge then the tamarah muzzle the terrance. The obie inactivate the terrance.", "logic": "\nMuzzle(tamarah, virge)\nMuzzle(terrance, obie)\nRecoilless(virge)\nInactivate(obie, terrance)\nInactivate(virge, tamarah) -> Plat(tamarah, virge)\nforall x (Muzzle(x, obie) -> Firm(x))\nforall x (Plat(x, obie) and Surrogate(x) -> Vestigial(obie))\nforall x (Plat(x, virge) -> Muzzle(x, terrance))\nforall x (Plat(x, virge) -> Inactivate(virge, tamarah))\nforall x (Recoilless(x) -> Plat(x, virge))\nforall x (Uveous(x) -> Plat(x, obie))\nMuzzle(tamarah, virge) -> Muzzle(tamarah, terrance)\n\nInactivate(obie, terrance)\n\ntherefore Inactivate(obie, terrance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The teddy gangrene the frayda. The charleton gangrene the lark. The frayda is homeric. The lark concuss the charleton. If the frayda concuss the teddy then the teddy chasten the frayda. If someone gangrene the lark then they are unicuspid. If someone chasten the lark and they are unsubdued then the lark is sinless. If someone chasten the frayda then they like the charleton. If someone chasten the frayda then the frayda concuss the teddy. If someone is homeric then they chase the frayda. If someone is peaceful then they chase the lark. If the teddy gangrene the frayda then the teddy gangrene the charleton. The frayda is not homeric.", "logic": "\nGangrene(teddy, frayda)\nGangrene(charleton, lark)\nHomeric(frayda)\nConcuss(lark, charleton)\nConcuss(frayda, teddy) -> Chasten(teddy, frayda)\nforall x (Gangrene(x, lark) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Chasten(x, lark) and Unsubdued(x) -> Sinless(lark))\nforall x (Chasten(x, frayda) -> Gangrene(x, charleton))\nforall x (Chasten(x, frayda) -> Concuss(frayda, teddy))\nforall x (Homeric(x) -> Chasten(x, frayda))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Chasten(x, lark))\nGangrene(teddy, frayda) -> Gangrene(teddy, charleton)\n\nnot Homeric(frayda)\n\ntherefore Homeric(frayda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The nikos scrunch the tess. The jayne scrunch the judie. The tess is spic. The judie bore the jayne. If the tess bore the nikos then the nikos pinch the tess. If someone scrunch the judie then they are prewar. If someone pinch the judie and they are mitral then the judie is papillary. If someone pinch the tess then they like the jayne. If someone pinch the tess then the tess bore the nikos. If someone is spic then they chase the tess. If someone is phlegmy then they chase the judie. If the nikos scrunch the tess then the nikos scrunch the jayne. The nikos scrunch the jayne.", "logic": "\nScrunch(nikos, tess)\nScrunch(jayne, judie)\nSpic(tess)\nBore(judie, jayne)\nBore(tess, nikos) -> Pinch(nikos, tess)\nforall x (Scrunch(x, judie) -> Prewar(x))\nforall x (Pinch(x, judie) and Mitral(x) -> Papillary(judie))\nforall x (Pinch(x, tess) -> Scrunch(x, jayne))\nforall x (Pinch(x, tess) -> Bore(tess, nikos))\nforall x (Spic(x) -> Pinch(x, tess))\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) -> Pinch(x, judie))\nScrunch(nikos, tess) -> Scrunch(nikos, jayne)\n\nScrunch(nikos, jayne)\n\nScrunch(nikos, tess) and Scrunch(nikos, tess) -> Scrunch(nikos, jayne) -> therefore Scrunch(nikos, jayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The michelle shlep the jacques. The cori shlep the kara. The jacques is ruminant. The kara exhort the cori. If the jacques exhort the michelle then the michelle relace the jacques. If someone shlep the kara then they are silicious. If someone relace the kara and they are trepid then the kara is oldline. If someone relace the jacques then they like the cori. If someone relace the jacques then the jacques exhort the michelle. If someone is ruminant then they chase the jacques. If someone is patched then they chase the kara. If the michelle shlep the jacques then the michelle shlep the cori. The michelle does not like the cori.", "logic": "\nShlep(michelle, jacques)\nShlep(cori, kara)\nRuminant(jacques)\nExhort(kara, cori)\nExhort(jacques, michelle) -> Relace(michelle, jacques)\nforall x (Shlep(x, kara) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Relace(x, kara) and Trepid(x) -> Oldline(kara))\nforall x (Relace(x, jacques) -> Shlep(x, cori))\nforall x (Relace(x, jacques) -> Exhort(jacques, michelle))\nforall x (Ruminant(x) -> Relace(x, jacques))\nforall x (Patched(x) -> Relace(x, kara))\nShlep(michelle, jacques) -> Shlep(michelle, cori)\n\nnot Shlep(michelle, cori)\n\nShlep(michelle, jacques) and Shlep(michelle, jacques) -> Shlep(michelle, cori) -> therefore Shlep(michelle, cori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The magna plumb the calley. The analise plumb the kristos. The calley is merciless. The kristos grill the analise. If the calley grill the magna then the magna speechify the calley. If someone plumb the kristos then they are fifteenth. If someone speechify the kristos and they are vincible then the kristos is strep. If someone speechify the calley then they like the analise. If someone speechify the calley then the calley grill the magna. If someone is merciless then they chase the calley. If someone is movable then they chase the kristos. If the magna plumb the calley then the magna plumb the analise. The calley grill the magna.", "logic": "\nPlumb(magna, calley)\nPlumb(analise, kristos)\nMerciless(calley)\nGrill(kristos, analise)\nGrill(calley, magna) -> Speechify(magna, calley)\nforall x (Plumb(x, kristos) -> Fifteenth(x))\nforall x (Speechify(x, kristos) and Vincible(x) -> Strep(kristos))\nforall x (Speechify(x, calley) -> Plumb(x, analise))\nforall x (Speechify(x, calley) -> Grill(calley, magna))\nforall x (Merciless(x) -> Speechify(x, calley))\nforall x (Movable(x) -> Speechify(x, kristos))\nPlumb(magna, calley) -> Plumb(magna, analise)\n\nGrill(calley, magna)\n\nMerciless(calley) and forall x (Merciless(x) -> Speechify(x, calley)) -> therefore Speechify(calley, calley) Speechify(calley, calley) and forall x (Speechify(x, calley) -> Grill(calley, magna)) -> therefore Grill(calley, magna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The kali overrefine the michele. The salem overrefine the skipton. The michele is parturient. The skipton increase the salem. If the michele increase the kali then the kali smother the michele. If someone overrefine the skipton then they are overhand. If someone smother the skipton and they are appellate then the skipton is poetic. If someone smother the michele then they like the salem. If someone smother the michele then the michele increase the kali. If someone is parturient then they chase the michele. If someone is dipolar then they chase the skipton. If the kali overrefine the michele then the kali overrefine the salem. The michele does not like the salem.", "logic": "\nOverrefine(kali, michele)\nOverrefine(salem, skipton)\nParturient(michele)\nIncrease(skipton, salem)\nIncrease(michele, kali) -> Smother(kali, michele)\nforall x (Overrefine(x, skipton) -> Overhand(x))\nforall x (Smother(x, skipton) and Appellate(x) -> Poetic(skipton))\nforall x (Smother(x, michele) -> Overrefine(x, salem))\nforall x (Smother(x, michele) -> Increase(michele, kali))\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Smother(x, michele))\nforall x (Dipolar(x) -> Smother(x, skipton))\nOverrefine(kali, michele) -> Overrefine(kali, salem)\n\nnot Overrefine(michele, salem)\n\nParturient(michele) and forall x (Parturient(x) -> Smother(x, michele)) -> therefore Smother(michele, michele) Smother(michele, michele) and forall x (Smother(x, michele) -> Overrefine(x, salem)) -> therefore Overrefine(michele, salem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The donovan miscount the logan. The silvana miscount the elric. The logan is clattery. The elric prowl the silvana. If the logan prowl the donovan then the donovan target the logan. If someone miscount the elric then they are acuminate. If someone target the elric and they are regenerate then the elric is annoying. If someone target the logan then they like the silvana. If someone target the logan then the logan prowl the donovan. If someone is clattery then they chase the logan. If someone is fossilised then they chase the elric. If the donovan miscount the logan then the donovan miscount the silvana. The donovan target the logan.", "logic": "\nMiscount(donovan, logan)\nMiscount(silvana, elric)\nClattery(logan)\nProwl(elric, silvana)\nProwl(logan, donovan) -> Target(donovan, logan)\nforall x (Miscount(x, elric) -> Acuminate(x))\nforall x (Target(x, elric) and Regenerate(x) -> Annoying(elric))\nforall x (Target(x, logan) -> Miscount(x, silvana))\nforall x (Target(x, logan) -> Prowl(logan, donovan))\nforall x (Clattery(x) -> Target(x, logan))\nforall x (Fossilised(x) -> Target(x, elric))\nMiscount(donovan, logan) -> Miscount(donovan, silvana)\n\nTarget(donovan, logan)\n\nClattery(logan) and forall x (Clattery(x) -> Target(x, logan)) -> therefore Target(logan, logan) Target(logan, logan) and forall x (Target(x, logan) -> Prowl(logan, donovan)) -> therefore Prowl(logan, donovan) Prowl(logan, donovan) and Prowl(logan, donovan) -> Target(donovan, logan) -> therefore Target(donovan, logan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The farica situate the lauretta. The calvin situate the agatha. The lauretta is nestled. The agatha grey the calvin. If the lauretta grey the farica then the farica panhandle the lauretta. If someone situate the agatha then they are unlined. If someone panhandle the agatha and they are ferric then the agatha is resistive. If someone panhandle the lauretta then they like the calvin. If someone panhandle the lauretta then the lauretta grey the farica. If someone is nestled then they chase the lauretta. If someone is rubicund then they chase the agatha. If the farica situate the lauretta then the farica situate the calvin. The farica does not chase the lauretta.", "logic": "\nSituate(farica, lauretta)\nSituate(calvin, agatha)\nNestled(lauretta)\nGrey(agatha, calvin)\nGrey(lauretta, farica) -> Panhandle(farica, lauretta)\nforall x (Situate(x, agatha) -> Unlined(x))\nforall x (Panhandle(x, agatha) and Ferric(x) -> Resistive(agatha))\nforall x (Panhandle(x, lauretta) -> Situate(x, calvin))\nforall x (Panhandle(x, lauretta) -> Grey(lauretta, farica))\nforall x (Nestled(x) -> Panhandle(x, lauretta))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) -> Panhandle(x, agatha))\nSituate(farica, lauretta) -> Situate(farica, calvin)\n\nnot Panhandle(farica, lauretta)\n\nNestled(lauretta) and forall x (Nestled(x) -> Panhandle(x, lauretta)) -> therefore Panhandle(lauretta, lauretta) Panhandle(lauretta, lauretta) and forall x (Panhandle(x, lauretta) -> Grey(lauretta, farica)) -> therefore Grey(lauretta, farica) Grey(lauretta, farica) and Grey(lauretta, farica) -> Panhandle(farica, lauretta) -> therefore Panhandle(farica, lauretta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The kariotta shack the wynne. The pearle shack the stig. The wynne is ironed. The stig vitaminise the pearle. If the wynne vitaminise the kariotta then the kariotta gnash the wynne. If someone shack the stig then they are broadnosed. If someone gnash the stig and they are bicolor then the stig is unloving. If someone gnash the wynne then they like the pearle. If someone gnash the wynne then the wynne vitaminise the kariotta. If someone is ironed then they chase the wynne. If someone is foliate then they chase the stig. If the kariotta shack the wynne then the kariotta shack the pearle. The pearle does not chase the wynne.", "logic": "\nShack(kariotta, wynne)\nShack(pearle, stig)\nIroned(wynne)\nVitaminise(stig, pearle)\nVitaminise(wynne, kariotta) -> Gnash(kariotta, wynne)\nforall x (Shack(x, stig) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Gnash(x, stig) and Bicolor(x) -> Unloving(stig))\nforall x (Gnash(x, wynne) -> Shack(x, pearle))\nforall x (Gnash(x, wynne) -> Vitaminise(wynne, kariotta))\nforall x (Ironed(x) -> Gnash(x, wynne))\nforall x (Foliate(x) -> Gnash(x, stig))\nShack(kariotta, wynne) -> Shack(kariotta, pearle)\n\nnot Gnash(pearle, wynne)\n\nforall x (Ironed(x) -> Gnash(x, wynne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The christi entomb the scot. The inesita entomb the tremaine. The scot is operose. The tremaine suborn the inesita. If the scot suborn the christi then the christi truckle the scot. If someone entomb the tremaine then they are gushy. If someone truckle the tremaine and they are unrouged then the tremaine is orphaned. If someone truckle the scot then they like the inesita. If someone truckle the scot then the scot suborn the christi. If someone is operose then they chase the scot. If someone is developed then they chase the tremaine. If the christi entomb the scot then the christi entomb the inesita. The scot truckle the tremaine.", "logic": "\nEntomb(christi, scot)\nEntomb(inesita, tremaine)\nOperose(scot)\nSuborn(tremaine, inesita)\nSuborn(scot, christi) -> Truckle(christi, scot)\nforall x (Entomb(x, tremaine) -> Gushy(x))\nforall x (Truckle(x, tremaine) and Unrouged(x) -> Orphaned(tremaine))\nforall x (Truckle(x, scot) -> Entomb(x, inesita))\nforall x (Truckle(x, scot) -> Suborn(scot, christi))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Truckle(x, scot))\nforall x (Developed(x) -> Truckle(x, tremaine))\nEntomb(christi, scot) -> Entomb(christi, inesita)\n\nTruckle(scot, tremaine)\n\nforall x (Developed(x) -> Truckle(x, tremaine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The yevette hinder the emmit. The leonerd hinder the inglebert. The emmit is corking. The inglebert unmuzzle the leonerd. If the emmit unmuzzle the yevette then the yevette matter the emmit. If someone hinder the inglebert then they are mulish. If someone matter the inglebert and they are fantastic then the inglebert is wormlike. If someone matter the emmit then they like the leonerd. If someone matter the emmit then the emmit unmuzzle the yevette. If someone is corking then they chase the emmit. If someone is fitting then they chase the inglebert. If the yevette hinder the emmit then the yevette hinder the leonerd. The inglebert does not like the leonerd.", "logic": "\nHinder(yevette, emmit)\nHinder(leonerd, inglebert)\nCorking(emmit)\nUnmuzzle(inglebert, leonerd)\nUnmuzzle(emmit, yevette) -> Matter(yevette, emmit)\nforall x (Hinder(x, inglebert) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Matter(x, inglebert) and Fantastic(x) -> Wormlike(inglebert))\nforall x (Matter(x, emmit) -> Hinder(x, leonerd))\nforall x (Matter(x, emmit) -> Unmuzzle(emmit, yevette))\nforall x (Corking(x) -> Matter(x, emmit))\nforall x (Fitting(x) -> Matter(x, inglebert))\nHinder(yevette, emmit) -> Hinder(yevette, leonerd)\n\nnot Hinder(inglebert, leonerd)\n\nforall x (Matter(x, emmit) -> Hinder(x, leonerd)) <- forall x (Corking(x) -> Matter(x, emmit)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The ranique camp the reggie. The steven camp the denni. The reggie is injured. The denni benefit the steven. If the reggie benefit the ranique then the ranique twitter the reggie. If someone camp the denni then they are anorthic. If someone twitter the denni and they are unhatched then the denni is especial. If someone twitter the reggie then they like the steven. If someone twitter the reggie then the reggie benefit the ranique. If someone is injured then they chase the reggie. If someone is coloured then they chase the denni. If the ranique camp the reggie then the ranique camp the steven. The steven twitter the denni.", "logic": "\nCamp(ranique, reggie)\nCamp(steven, denni)\nInjured(reggie)\nBenefit(denni, steven)\nBenefit(reggie, ranique) -> Twitter(ranique, reggie)\nforall x (Camp(x, denni) -> Anorthic(x))\nforall x (Twitter(x, denni) and Unhatched(x) -> Especial(denni))\nforall x (Twitter(x, reggie) -> Camp(x, steven))\nforall x (Twitter(x, reggie) -> Benefit(reggie, ranique))\nforall x (Injured(x) -> Twitter(x, reggie))\nforall x (Coloured(x) -> Twitter(x, denni))\nCamp(ranique, reggie) -> Camp(ranique, steven)\n\nTwitter(steven, denni)\n\nforall x (Coloured(x) -> Twitter(x, denni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The ines track the lucius. The ursala track the farand. The lucius is secret. The farand amalgamate the ursala. If the lucius amalgamate the ines then the ines covet the lucius. If someone track the farand then they are reddish. If someone covet the farand and they are ischaemic then the farand is kookie. If someone covet the lucius then they like the ursala. If someone covet the lucius then the lucius amalgamate the ines. If someone is secret then they chase the lucius. If someone is west then they chase the farand. If the ines track the lucius then the ines track the ursala. The lucius is not west.", "logic": "\nTrack(ines, lucius)\nTrack(ursala, farand)\nSecret(lucius)\nAmalgamate(farand, ursala)\nAmalgamate(lucius, ines) -> Covet(ines, lucius)\nforall x (Track(x, farand) -> Reddish(x))\nforall x (Covet(x, farand) and Ischaemic(x) -> Kookie(farand))\nforall x (Covet(x, lucius) -> Track(x, ursala))\nforall x (Covet(x, lucius) -> Amalgamate(lucius, ines))\nforall x (Secret(x) -> Covet(x, lucius))\nforall x (West(x) -> Covet(x, farand))\nTrack(ines, lucius) -> Track(ines, ursala)\n\nnot West(lucius)\n\nnot West(lucius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The donal berry the mirabella. The merridie berry the gayleen. The mirabella is faveolate. The gayleen surfeit the merridie. If the mirabella surfeit the donal then the donal civilise the mirabella. If someone berry the gayleen then they are gaping. If someone civilise the gayleen and they are tabular then the gayleen is agnate. If someone civilise the mirabella then they like the merridie. If someone civilise the mirabella then the mirabella surfeit the donal. If someone is faveolate then they chase the mirabella. If someone is wheezy then they chase the gayleen. If the donal berry the mirabella then the donal berry the merridie. The gayleen civilise the donal.", "logic": "\nBerry(donal, mirabella)\nBerry(merridie, gayleen)\nFaveolate(mirabella)\nSurfeit(gayleen, merridie)\nSurfeit(mirabella, donal) -> Civilise(donal, mirabella)\nforall x (Berry(x, gayleen) -> Gaping(x))\nforall x (Civilise(x, gayleen) and Tabular(x) -> Agnate(gayleen))\nforall x (Civilise(x, mirabella) -> Berry(x, merridie))\nforall x (Civilise(x, mirabella) -> Surfeit(mirabella, donal))\nforall x (Faveolate(x) -> Civilise(x, mirabella))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Civilise(x, gayleen))\nBerry(donal, mirabella) -> Berry(donal, merridie)\n\nCivilise(gayleen, donal)\n\nCivilise(gayleen, donal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The lezlie hang the dorette. The mabel hang the nancie. The dorette is eatable. The nancie stow the mabel. If the dorette stow the lezlie then the lezlie extenuate the dorette. If someone hang the nancie then they are alpestrine. If someone extenuate the nancie and they are annelid then the nancie is improvable. If someone extenuate the dorette then they like the mabel. If someone extenuate the dorette then the dorette stow the lezlie. If someone is eatable then they chase the dorette. If someone is zesty then they chase the nancie. If the lezlie hang the dorette then the lezlie hang the mabel. The lezlie does not eat the dorette.", "logic": "\nHang(lezlie, dorette)\nHang(mabel, nancie)\nEatable(dorette)\nStow(nancie, mabel)\nStow(dorette, lezlie) -> Extenuate(lezlie, dorette)\nforall x (Hang(x, nancie) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Extenuate(x, nancie) and Annelid(x) -> Improvable(nancie))\nforall x (Extenuate(x, dorette) -> Hang(x, mabel))\nforall x (Extenuate(x, dorette) -> Stow(dorette, lezlie))\nforall x (Eatable(x) -> Extenuate(x, dorette))\nforall x (Zesty(x) -> Extenuate(x, nancie))\nHang(lezlie, dorette) -> Hang(lezlie, mabel)\n\nnot Stow(lezlie, dorette)\n\nnot Stow(lezlie, dorette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The tarrance sanction the manish. The wilton sanction the elladine. The manish is gruelling. The elladine handwash the wilton. If the manish handwash the tarrance then the tarrance segregate the manish. If someone sanction the elladine then they are brownish. If someone segregate the elladine and they are septuple then the elladine is iliac. If someone segregate the manish then they like the wilton. If someone segregate the manish then the manish handwash the tarrance. If someone is gruelling then they chase the manish. If someone is burundi then they chase the elladine. If the tarrance sanction the manish then the tarrance sanction the wilton. The tarrance is burundi.", "logic": "\nSanction(tarrance, manish)\nSanction(wilton, elladine)\nGruelling(manish)\nHandwash(elladine, wilton)\nHandwash(manish, tarrance) -> Segregate(tarrance, manish)\nforall x (Sanction(x, elladine) -> Brownish(x))\nforall x (Segregate(x, elladine) and Septuple(x) -> Iliac(elladine))\nforall x (Segregate(x, manish) -> Sanction(x, wilton))\nforall x (Segregate(x, manish) -> Handwash(manish, tarrance))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) -> Segregate(x, manish))\nforall x (Burundi(x) -> Segregate(x, elladine))\nSanction(tarrance, manish) -> Sanction(tarrance, wilton)\n\nBurundi(tarrance)\n\nBurundi(tarrance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "Kally is not paranasal. Kally is not bolshevist. Kally is cerulean. Kally is not unstarred. Dean is paranasal. Dean is not frank. Dean is bolshevist. Big, unstarred things are cerulean. Big things are cerulean. If something is worthy then it is unstarred. If something is carotid and frank then it is worthy. Green, carotid things are worthy. If something is carotid and not bolshevist then it is frank. All bolshevist things are carotid. Quiet things are carotid. Dean is bolshevist.", "logic": "\nnot Paranasal(kally)\nnot Bolshevist(kally)\nCerulean(kally)\nnot Unstarred(kally)\nParanasal(dean)\nnot Frank(dean)\nBolshevist(dean)\nforall x (Paranasal(x) and Unstarred(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Paranasal(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Worthy(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) and Frank(x) -> Worthy(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) and Carotid(x) -> Worthy(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) and not Bolshevist(x) -> Frank(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Worthy(x) -> Carotid(x))\n\nBolshevist(dean)\n\ntherefore Bolshevist(dean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Gershom is not lacelike. Gershom is not formosan. Gershom is depletable. Gershom is not narrative. Opaline is lacelike. Opaline is not dissilient. Opaline is formosan. Big, narrative things are depletable. Big things are depletable. If something is languorous then it is narrative. If something is sticky and dissilient then it is languorous. Green, sticky things are languorous. If something is sticky and not formosan then it is dissilient. All formosan things are sticky. Quiet things are sticky. Gershom is lacelike.", "logic": "\nnot Lacelike(gershom)\nnot Formosan(gershom)\nDepletable(gershom)\nnot Narrative(gershom)\nLacelike(opaline)\nnot Dissilient(opaline)\nFormosan(opaline)\nforall x (Lacelike(x) and Narrative(x) -> Depletable(x))\nforall x (Lacelike(x) -> Depletable(x))\nforall x (Languorous(x) -> Narrative(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) and Dissilient(x) -> Languorous(x))\nforall x (Formosan(x) and Sticky(x) -> Languorous(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) and not Formosan(x) -> Dissilient(x))\nforall x (Formosan(x) -> Sticky(x))\nforall x (Languorous(x) -> Sticky(x))\n\nLacelike(gershom)\n\ntherefore not Lacelike(gershom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Lazaro is not nonhairy. Lazaro is not miasmal. Lazaro is squalid. Lazaro is not fluvial. Amabel is nonhairy. Amabel is not truncate. Amabel is miasmal. Big, fluvial things are squalid. Big things are squalid. If something is xlvii then it is fluvial. If something is bonkers and truncate then it is xlvii. Green, bonkers things are xlvii. If something is bonkers and not miasmal then it is truncate. All miasmal things are bonkers. Quiet things are bonkers. Amabel is squalid.", "logic": "\nnot Nonhairy(lazaro)\nnot Miasmal(lazaro)\nSqualid(lazaro)\nnot Fluvial(lazaro)\nNonhairy(amabel)\nnot Truncate(amabel)\nMiasmal(amabel)\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) and Fluvial(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Fluvial(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) and Truncate(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Bonkers(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) and not Miasmal(x) -> Truncate(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Bonkers(x))\n\nSqualid(amabel)\n\nNonhairy(amabel) and forall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Squalid(x)) -> therefore Squalid(amabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Cyb is not musing. Cyb is not inevitable. Cyb is threefold. Cyb is not ferial. Ripley is musing. Ripley is not disgraced. Ripley is inevitable. Big, ferial things are threefold. Big things are threefold. If something is yeastlike then it is ferial. If something is capable and disgraced then it is yeastlike. Green, capable things are yeastlike. If something is capable and not inevitable then it is disgraced. All inevitable things are capable. Quiet things are capable. Ripley is not capable.", "logic": "\nnot Musing(cyb)\nnot Inevitable(cyb)\nThreefold(cyb)\nnot Ferial(cyb)\nMusing(ripley)\nnot Disgraced(ripley)\nInevitable(ripley)\nforall x (Musing(x) and Ferial(x) -> Threefold(x))\nforall x (Musing(x) -> Threefold(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and Disgraced(x) -> Yeastlike(x))\nforall x (Inevitable(x) and Capable(x) -> Yeastlike(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and not Inevitable(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Inevitable(x) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Capable(x))\n\nnot Capable(ripley)\n\nInevitable(ripley) and forall x (Inevitable(x) -> Capable(x)) -> therefore Capable(ripley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Jacinthe is not pentatonic. Jacinthe is not unagitated. Jacinthe is holophytic. Jacinthe is not meek. Harvey is pentatonic. Harvey is not procedural. Harvey is unagitated. Big, meek things are holophytic. Big things are holophytic. If something is neuroglial then it is meek. If something is unpainful and procedural then it is neuroglial. Green, unpainful things are neuroglial. If something is unpainful and not unagitated then it is procedural. All unagitated things are unpainful. Quiet things are unpainful. Harvey is neuroglial.", "logic": "\nnot Pentatonic(jacinthe)\nnot Unagitated(jacinthe)\nHolophytic(jacinthe)\nnot Meek(jacinthe)\nPentatonic(harvey)\nnot Procedural(harvey)\nUnagitated(harvey)\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) and Meek(x) -> Holophytic(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Holophytic(x))\nforall x (Neuroglial(x) -> Meek(x))\nforall x (Unpainful(x) and Procedural(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Unagitated(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Unpainful(x) and not Unagitated(x) -> Procedural(x))\nforall x (Unagitated(x) -> Unpainful(x))\nforall x (Neuroglial(x) -> Unpainful(x))\n\nNeuroglial(harvey)\n\nUnagitated(harvey) and forall x (Unagitated(x) -> Unpainful(x)) -> therefore Unpainful(harvey) Unagitated(harvey) and Unpainful(harvey) and forall x (Unagitated(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Neuroglial(x)) -> therefore Neuroglial(harvey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Quincey is not nuts. Quincey is not thieving. Quincey is sigmoidal. Quincey is not albinistic. Becka is nuts. Becka is not narcotised. Becka is thieving. Big, albinistic things are sigmoidal. Big things are sigmoidal. If something is annexal then it is albinistic. If something is degressive and narcotised then it is annexal. Green, degressive things are annexal. If something is degressive and not thieving then it is narcotised. All thieving things are degressive. Quiet things are degressive. Becka is not annexal.", "logic": "\nnot Nuts(quincey)\nnot Thieving(quincey)\nSigmoidal(quincey)\nnot Albinistic(quincey)\nNuts(becka)\nnot Narcotised(becka)\nThieving(becka)\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Albinistic(x) -> Sigmoidal(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Sigmoidal(x))\nforall x (Annexal(x) -> Albinistic(x))\nforall x (Degressive(x) and Narcotised(x) -> Annexal(x))\nforall x (Thieving(x) and Degressive(x) -> Annexal(x))\nforall x (Degressive(x) and not Thieving(x) -> Narcotised(x))\nforall x (Thieving(x) -> Degressive(x))\nforall x (Annexal(x) -> Degressive(x))\n\nnot Annexal(becka)\n\nThieving(becka) and forall x (Thieving(x) -> Degressive(x)) -> therefore Degressive(becka) Thieving(becka) and Degressive(becka) and forall x (Thieving(x) and Degressive(x) -> Annexal(x)) -> therefore Annexal(becka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Walt is not coruscant. Walt is not damaging. Walt is moderating. Walt is not doltish. Mart is coruscant. Mart is not swaybacked. Mart is damaging. Big, doltish things are moderating. Big things are moderating. If something is crumpled then it is doltish. If something is witchlike and swaybacked then it is crumpled. Green, witchlike things are crumpled. If something is witchlike and not damaging then it is swaybacked. All damaging things are witchlike. Quiet things are witchlike. Mart is doltish.", "logic": "\nnot Coruscant(walt)\nnot Damaging(walt)\nModerating(walt)\nnot Doltish(walt)\nCoruscant(mart)\nnot Swaybacked(mart)\nDamaging(mart)\nforall x (Coruscant(x) and Doltish(x) -> Moderating(x))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) -> Moderating(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) -> Doltish(x))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) and Swaybacked(x) -> Crumpled(x))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and Witchlike(x) -> Crumpled(x))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) and not Damaging(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\nforall x (Damaging(x) -> Witchlike(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) -> Witchlike(x))\n\nDoltish(mart)\n\nDamaging(mart) and forall x (Damaging(x) -> Witchlike(x)) -> therefore Witchlike(mart) Damaging(mart) and Witchlike(mart) and forall x (Damaging(x) and Witchlike(x) -> Crumpled(x)) -> therefore Crumpled(mart) Crumpled(mart) and forall x (Crumpled(x) -> Doltish(x)) -> therefore Doltish(mart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Arlana is not indefinite. Arlana is not pitted. Arlana is fugly. Arlana is not tapestried. Chadd is indefinite. Chadd is not mediated. Chadd is pitted. Big, tapestried things are fugly. Big things are fugly. If something is denotive then it is tapestried. If something is latin and mediated then it is denotive. Green, latin things are denotive. If something is latin and not pitted then it is mediated. All pitted things are latin. Quiet things are latin. Chadd is not tapestried.", "logic": "\nnot Indefinite(arlana)\nnot Pitted(arlana)\nFugly(arlana)\nnot Tapestried(arlana)\nIndefinite(chadd)\nnot Mediated(chadd)\nPitted(chadd)\nforall x (Indefinite(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Indefinite(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) and Mediated(x) -> Denotive(x))\nforall x (Pitted(x) and Latin(x) -> Denotive(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) and not Pitted(x) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Pitted(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) -> Latin(x))\n\nnot Tapestried(chadd)\n\nPitted(chadd) and forall x (Pitted(x) -> Latin(x)) -> therefore Latin(chadd) Pitted(chadd) and Latin(chadd) and forall x (Pitted(x) and Latin(x) -> Denotive(x)) -> therefore Denotive(chadd) Denotive(chadd) and forall x (Denotive(x) -> Tapestried(x)) -> therefore Tapestried(chadd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Gardner is not laborious. Gardner is not cloudless. Gardner is binuclear. Gardner is not inertial. Rina is laborious. Rina is not billion. Rina is cloudless. Big, inertial things are binuclear. Big things are binuclear. If something is studied then it is inertial. If something is synoptic and billion then it is studied. Green, synoptic things are studied. If something is synoptic and not cloudless then it is billion. All cloudless things are synoptic. Quiet things are synoptic. Gardner is not billion.", "logic": "\nnot Laborious(gardner)\nnot Cloudless(gardner)\nBinuclear(gardner)\nnot Inertial(gardner)\nLaborious(rina)\nnot Billion(rina)\nCloudless(rina)\nforall x (Laborious(x) and Inertial(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Studied(x) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and Billion(x) -> Studied(x))\nforall x (Cloudless(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Studied(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and not Cloudless(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Cloudless(x) -> Synoptic(x))\nforall x (Studied(x) -> Synoptic(x))\n\nnot Billion(gardner)\n\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and not Cloudless(x) -> Billion(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Geeta is not aflame. Geeta is not binomial. Geeta is cancerous. Geeta is not malformed. Georgie is aflame. Georgie is not alienable. Georgie is binomial. Big, malformed things are cancerous. Big things are cancerous. If something is august then it is malformed. If something is biaural and alienable then it is august. Green, biaural things are august. If something is biaural and not binomial then it is alienable. All binomial things are biaural. Quiet things are biaural. Geeta is august.", "logic": "\nnot Aflame(geeta)\nnot Binomial(geeta)\nCancerous(geeta)\nnot Malformed(geeta)\nAflame(georgie)\nnot Alienable(georgie)\nBinomial(georgie)\nforall x (Aflame(x) and Malformed(x) -> Cancerous(x))\nforall x (Aflame(x) -> Cancerous(x))\nforall x (August(x) -> Malformed(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) and Alienable(x) -> August(x))\nforall x (Binomial(x) and Biaural(x) -> August(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) and not Binomial(x) -> Alienable(x))\nforall x (Binomial(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (August(x) -> Biaural(x))\n\nAugust(geeta)\n\nforall x (Biaural(x) and Alienable(x) -> August(x)) <- forall x (Biaural(x) and not Binomial(x) -> Alienable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Odetta is subarctic. Odetta is alienated. Odetta is puffed. If Odetta is subarctic then Odetta is valorous. All valorous things are not infamous. If Odetta is befouled and Odetta is valorous then Odetta is searching. All befouled things are searching. If something is valorous then it is befouled. If something is searching and not valorous then it is not alienated. If something is subarctic and searching then it is puffed. If something is alienated and not infamous then it is puffed. Odetta is puffed.", "logic": "\nSubarctic(odetta)\nAlienated(odetta)\nPuffed(odetta)\nSubarctic(odetta) -> Valorous(odetta)\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> not Infamous(x))\nBefouled(odetta) and Valorous(odetta) -> Searching(odetta)\nforall x (Befouled(x) -> Searching(x))\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> Befouled(x))\nforall x (Searching(x) and not Valorous(x) -> not Alienated(x))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and Searching(x) -> Puffed(x))\nforall x (Alienated(x) and not Infamous(x) -> Puffed(x))\n\nPuffed(odetta)\n\ntherefore Puffed(odetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Mozelle is augean. Mozelle is crackers. Mozelle is rupicolous. If Mozelle is augean then Mozelle is articulate. All articulate things are not anadromous. If Mozelle is gritty and Mozelle is articulate then Mozelle is unfounded. All gritty things are unfounded. If something is articulate then it is gritty. If something is unfounded and not articulate then it is not crackers. If something is augean and unfounded then it is rupicolous. If something is crackers and not anadromous then it is rupicolous. Mozelle is not crackers.", "logic": "\nAugean(mozelle)\nCrackers(mozelle)\nRupicolous(mozelle)\nAugean(mozelle) -> Articulate(mozelle)\nforall x (Articulate(x) -> not Anadromous(x))\nGritty(mozelle) and Articulate(mozelle) -> Unfounded(mozelle)\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Unfounded(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x) -> Gritty(x))\nforall x (Unfounded(x) and not Articulate(x) -> not Crackers(x))\nforall x (Augean(x) and Unfounded(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) and not Anadromous(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\n\nnot Crackers(mozelle)\n\ntherefore Crackers(mozelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Elvina is prideful. Elvina is soporific. Elvina is pink. If Elvina is prideful then Elvina is dappled. All dappled things are not photic. If Elvina is deterrent and Elvina is dappled then Elvina is bloodshot. All deterrent things are bloodshot. If something is dappled then it is deterrent. If something is bloodshot and not dappled then it is not soporific. If something is prideful and bloodshot then it is pink. If something is soporific and not photic then it is pink. Elvina is dappled.", "logic": "\nPrideful(elvina)\nSoporific(elvina)\nPink(elvina)\nPrideful(elvina) -> Dappled(elvina)\nforall x (Dappled(x) -> not Photic(x))\nDeterrent(elvina) and Dappled(elvina) -> Bloodshot(elvina)\nforall x (Deterrent(x) -> Bloodshot(x))\nforall x (Dappled(x) -> Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) and not Dappled(x) -> not Soporific(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) and Bloodshot(x) -> Pink(x))\nforall x (Soporific(x) and not Photic(x) -> Pink(x))\n\nDappled(elvina)\n\nPrideful(elvina) and Prideful(elvina) -> Dappled(elvina) -> therefore Dappled(elvina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Zonnya is trimmed. Zonnya is educative. Zonnya is most. If Zonnya is trimmed then Zonnya is unuseable. All unuseable things are not carbonated. If Zonnya is divine and Zonnya is unuseable then Zonnya is togolese. All divine things are togolese. If something is unuseable then it is divine. If something is togolese and not unuseable then it is not educative. If something is trimmed and togolese then it is most. If something is educative and not carbonated then it is most. Zonnya is not unuseable.", "logic": "\nTrimmed(zonnya)\nEducative(zonnya)\nMost(zonnya)\nTrimmed(zonnya) -> Unuseable(zonnya)\nforall x (Unuseable(x) -> not Carbonated(x))\nDivine(zonnya) and Unuseable(zonnya) -> Togolese(zonnya)\nforall x (Divine(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) -> Divine(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) and not Unuseable(x) -> not Educative(x))\nforall x (Trimmed(x) and Togolese(x) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Educative(x) and not Carbonated(x) -> Most(x))\n\nnot Unuseable(zonnya)\n\nTrimmed(zonnya) and Trimmed(zonnya) -> Unuseable(zonnya) -> therefore Unuseable(zonnya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Philis is donnean. Philis is weedy. Philis is blest. If Philis is donnean then Philis is weary. All weary things are not voidable. If Philis is becalmed and Philis is weary then Philis is mimic. All becalmed things are mimic. If something is weary then it is becalmed. If something is mimic and not weary then it is not weedy. If something is donnean and mimic then it is blest. If something is weedy and not voidable then it is blest. Philis is becalmed.", "logic": "\nDonnean(philis)\nWeedy(philis)\nBlest(philis)\nDonnean(philis) -> Weary(philis)\nforall x (Weary(x) -> not Voidable(x))\nBecalmed(philis) and Weary(philis) -> Mimic(philis)\nforall x (Becalmed(x) -> Mimic(x))\nforall x (Weary(x) -> Becalmed(x))\nforall x (Mimic(x) and not Weary(x) -> not Weedy(x))\nforall x (Donnean(x) and Mimic(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) and not Voidable(x) -> Blest(x))\n\nBecalmed(philis)\n\nDonnean(philis) and Donnean(philis) -> Weary(philis) -> therefore Weary(philis) Weary(philis) and forall x (Weary(x) -> Becalmed(x)) -> therefore Becalmed(philis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Belvia is speakable. Belvia is aerobic. Belvia is perianal. If Belvia is speakable then Belvia is membranous. All membranous things are not verbalized. If Belvia is vulval and Belvia is membranous then Belvia is crustacean. All vulval things are crustacean. If something is membranous then it is vulval. If something is crustacean and not membranous then it is not aerobic. If something is speakable and crustacean then it is perianal. If something is aerobic and not verbalized then it is perianal. Belvia is verbalized.", "logic": "\nSpeakable(belvia)\nAerobic(belvia)\nPerianal(belvia)\nSpeakable(belvia) -> Membranous(belvia)\nforall x (Membranous(x) -> not Verbalized(x))\nVulval(belvia) and Membranous(belvia) -> Crustacean(belvia)\nforall x (Vulval(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Membranous(x) -> Vulval(x))\nforall x (Crustacean(x) and not Membranous(x) -> not Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Speakable(x) and Crustacean(x) -> Perianal(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) and not Verbalized(x) -> Perianal(x))\n\nVerbalized(belvia)\n\nSpeakable(belvia) and Speakable(belvia) -> Membranous(belvia) -> therefore Membranous(belvia) Membranous(belvia) and forall x (Membranous(x) -> not Verbalized(x)) -> therefore not Verbalized(belvia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Abbot is xxxiii. Abbot is unattached. Abbot is queenlike. If Abbot is xxxiii then Abbot is cernuous. All cernuous things are not buffoonish. If Abbot is denuded and Abbot is cernuous then Abbot is merging. All denuded things are merging. If something is cernuous then it is denuded. If something is merging and not cernuous then it is not unattached. If something is xxxiii and merging then it is queenlike. If something is unattached and not buffoonish then it is queenlike. Abbot is merging.", "logic": "\nXxxiii(abbot)\nUnattached(abbot)\nQueenlike(abbot)\nXxxiii(abbot) -> Cernuous(abbot)\nforall x (Cernuous(x) -> not Buffoonish(x))\nDenuded(abbot) and Cernuous(abbot) -> Merging(abbot)\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Merging(x))\nforall x (Cernuous(x) -> Denuded(x))\nforall x (Merging(x) and not Cernuous(x) -> not Unattached(x))\nforall x (Xxxiii(x) and Merging(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and not Buffoonish(x) -> Queenlike(x))\n\nMerging(abbot)\n\nXxxiii(abbot) and Xxxiii(abbot) -> Cernuous(abbot) -> therefore Cernuous(abbot) Cernuous(abbot) and forall x (Cernuous(x) -> Denuded(x)) -> therefore Denuded(abbot) Denuded(abbot) and forall x (Denuded(x) -> Merging(x)) -> therefore Merging(abbot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Gerhardt is wigged. Gerhardt is principled. Gerhardt is acinose. If Gerhardt is wigged then Gerhardt is apocrine. All apocrine things are not suitable. If Gerhardt is wooded and Gerhardt is apocrine then Gerhardt is unbloody. All wooded things are unbloody. If something is apocrine then it is wooded. If something is unbloody and not apocrine then it is not principled. If something is wigged and unbloody then it is acinose. If something is principled and not suitable then it is acinose. Gerhardt is not unbloody.", "logic": "\nWigged(gerhardt)\nPrincipled(gerhardt)\nAcinose(gerhardt)\nWigged(gerhardt) -> Apocrine(gerhardt)\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> not Suitable(x))\nWooded(gerhardt) and Apocrine(gerhardt) -> Unbloody(gerhardt)\nforall x (Wooded(x) -> Unbloody(x))\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> Wooded(x))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and not Apocrine(x) -> not Principled(x))\nforall x (Wigged(x) and Unbloody(x) -> Acinose(x))\nforall x (Principled(x) and not Suitable(x) -> Acinose(x))\n\nnot Unbloody(gerhardt)\n\nWigged(gerhardt) and Wigged(gerhardt) -> Apocrine(gerhardt) -> therefore Apocrine(gerhardt) Apocrine(gerhardt) and forall x (Apocrine(x) -> Wooded(x)) -> therefore Wooded(gerhardt) Wooded(gerhardt) and forall x (Wooded(x) -> Unbloody(x)) -> therefore Unbloody(gerhardt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Annabella is haughty. Annabella is adjustive. Annabella is prolific. Ameline is haughty. Ameline is separable. Ameline is adjustive. Kirbie is prolific. If something is separable then it is adrenergic. Cold things are separable. If something is prolific and adjustive then it is diestrous. White things are haughty. If something is adrenergic then it is tiled. Red things are adrenergic. Annabella is adjustive.", "logic": "\nHaughty(annabella)\nAdjustive(annabella)\nProlific(annabella)\nHaughty(ameline)\nSeparable(ameline)\nAdjustive(ameline)\nProlific(kirbie)\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Adrenergic(x))\nforall x (Haughty(x) -> Separable(x))\nforall x (Prolific(x) and Adjustive(x) -> Diestrous(x))\nforall x (Prolific(x) -> Haughty(x))\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) -> Tiled(x))\nforall x (Adjustive(x) -> Adrenergic(x))\n\nAdjustive(annabella)\n\ntherefore Adjustive(annabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Kandace is avoidable. Kandace is unoiled. Kandace is botonnee. Granville is avoidable. Granville is implicit. Granville is unoiled. Adah is botonnee. If something is implicit then it is piteous. Cold things are implicit. If something is botonnee and unoiled then it is erosive. White things are avoidable. If something is piteous then it is flamboyant. Red things are piteous. Kandace is not botonnee.", "logic": "\nAvoidable(kandace)\nUnoiled(kandace)\nBotonnee(kandace)\nAvoidable(granville)\nImplicit(granville)\nUnoiled(granville)\nBotonnee(adah)\nforall x (Implicit(x) -> Piteous(x))\nforall x (Avoidable(x) -> Implicit(x))\nforall x (Botonnee(x) and Unoiled(x) -> Erosive(x))\nforall x (Botonnee(x) -> Avoidable(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> Piteous(x))\n\nnot Botonnee(kandace)\n\ntherefore Botonnee(kandace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Ula is compulsory. Ula is suboceanic. Ula is ankylotic. Nessy is compulsory. Nessy is modest. Nessy is suboceanic. Lusa is ankylotic. If something is modest then it is unfattened. Cold things are modest. If something is ankylotic and suboceanic then it is homely. White things are compulsory. If something is unfattened then it is autosomal. Red things are unfattened. Nessy is unfattened.", "logic": "\nCompulsory(ula)\nSuboceanic(ula)\nAnkylotic(ula)\nCompulsory(nessy)\nModest(nessy)\nSuboceanic(nessy)\nAnkylotic(lusa)\nforall x (Modest(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Modest(x))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) and Suboceanic(x) -> Homely(x))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Unfattened(x) -> Autosomal(x))\nforall x (Suboceanic(x) -> Unfattened(x))\n\nUnfattened(nessy)\n\nModest(nessy) and forall x (Modest(x) -> Unfattened(x)) -> therefore Unfattened(nessy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Dyana is aloof. Dyana is dipterous. Dyana is heedless. Dulcy is aloof. Dulcy is unbiased. Dulcy is dipterous. Tyne is heedless. If something is unbiased then it is weightless. Cold things are unbiased. If something is heedless and dipterous then it is drippy. White things are aloof. If something is weightless then it is motorless. Red things are weightless. Dulcy is not weightless.", "logic": "\nAloof(dyana)\nDipterous(dyana)\nHeedless(dyana)\nAloof(dulcy)\nUnbiased(dulcy)\nDipterous(dulcy)\nHeedless(tyne)\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Weightless(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nforall x (Heedless(x) and Dipterous(x) -> Drippy(x))\nforall x (Heedless(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Weightless(x) -> Motorless(x))\nforall x (Dipterous(x) -> Weightless(x))\n\nnot Weightless(dulcy)\n\nUnbiased(dulcy) and forall x (Unbiased(x) -> Weightless(x)) -> therefore Weightless(dulcy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Frederic is incitive. Frederic is earthbound. Frederic is clausal. Ricki is incitive. Ricki is upstanding. Ricki is earthbound. Immanuel is clausal. If something is upstanding then it is aggregated. Cold things are upstanding. If something is clausal and earthbound then it is multiple. White things are incitive. If something is aggregated then it is miraculous. Red things are aggregated. Immanuel is upstanding.", "logic": "\nIncitive(frederic)\nEarthbound(frederic)\nClausal(frederic)\nIncitive(ricki)\nUpstanding(ricki)\nEarthbound(ricki)\nClausal(immanuel)\nforall x (Upstanding(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nforall x (Incitive(x) -> Upstanding(x))\nforall x (Clausal(x) and Earthbound(x) -> Multiple(x))\nforall x (Clausal(x) -> Incitive(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) -> Aggregated(x))\n\nUpstanding(immanuel)\n\nClausal(immanuel) and forall x (Clausal(x) -> Incitive(x)) -> therefore Incitive(immanuel) Incitive(immanuel) and forall x (Incitive(x) -> Upstanding(x)) -> therefore Upstanding(immanuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Flore is elder. Flore is peppery. Flore is festal. Matthias is elder. Matthias is papillate. Matthias is peppery. Kenton is festal. If something is papillate then it is sleeved. Cold things are papillate. If something is festal and peppery then it is monastic. White things are elder. If something is sleeved then it is spinose. Red things are sleeved. Flore is not spinose.", "logic": "\nElder(flore)\nPeppery(flore)\nFestal(flore)\nElder(matthias)\nPapillate(matthias)\nPeppery(matthias)\nFestal(kenton)\nforall x (Papillate(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Elder(x) -> Papillate(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and Peppery(x) -> Monastic(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) -> Elder(x))\nforall x (Sleeved(x) -> Spinose(x))\nforall x (Peppery(x) -> Sleeved(x))\n\nnot Spinose(flore)\n\nPeppery(flore) and forall x (Peppery(x) -> Sleeved(x)) -> therefore Sleeved(flore) Sleeved(flore) and forall x (Sleeved(x) -> Spinose(x)) -> therefore Spinose(flore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Allyce is huddled. Allyce is triple. Allyce is amalgamate. Amy is huddled. Amy is unconfused. Amy is triple. Angelika is amalgamate. If something is unconfused then it is irritating. Cold things are unconfused. If something is amalgamate and triple then it is outgoing. White things are huddled. If something is irritating then it is macaronic. Red things are irritating. Angelika is irritating.", "logic": "\nHuddled(allyce)\nTriple(allyce)\nAmalgamate(allyce)\nHuddled(amy)\nUnconfused(amy)\nTriple(amy)\nAmalgamate(angelika)\nforall x (Unconfused(x) -> Irritating(x))\nforall x (Huddled(x) -> Unconfused(x))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x) and Triple(x) -> Outgoing(x))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Irritating(x) -> Macaronic(x))\nforall x (Triple(x) -> Irritating(x))\n\nIrritating(angelika)\n\nAmalgamate(angelika) and forall x (Amalgamate(x) -> Huddled(x)) -> therefore Huddled(angelika) Huddled(angelika) and forall x (Huddled(x) -> Unconfused(x)) -> therefore Unconfused(angelika) Unconfused(angelika) and forall x (Unconfused(x) -> Irritating(x)) -> therefore Irritating(angelika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Ruthe is iatrogenic. Ruthe is hard. Ruthe is beefy. Etheline is iatrogenic. Etheline is pemphigous. Etheline is hard. Reece is beefy. If something is pemphigous then it is dateable. Cold things are pemphigous. If something is beefy and hard then it is pubescent. White things are iatrogenic. If something is dateable then it is scheduled. Red things are dateable. Reece is not dateable.", "logic": "\nIatrogenic(ruthe)\nHard(ruthe)\nBeefy(ruthe)\nIatrogenic(etheline)\nPemphigous(etheline)\nHard(etheline)\nBeefy(reece)\nforall x (Pemphigous(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Pemphigous(x))\nforall x (Beefy(x) and Hard(x) -> Pubescent(x))\nforall x (Beefy(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Hard(x) -> Dateable(x))\n\nnot Dateable(reece)\n\nBeefy(reece) and forall x (Beefy(x) -> Iatrogenic(x)) -> therefore Iatrogenic(reece) Iatrogenic(reece) and forall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Pemphigous(x)) -> therefore Pemphigous(reece) Pemphigous(reece) and forall x (Pemphigous(x) -> Dateable(x)) -> therefore Dateable(reece)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Mallissa is candid. Mallissa is hearsay. Mallissa is vapourous. Loni is candid. Loni is cyrillic. Loni is hearsay. Roby is vapourous. If something is cyrillic then it is scentless. Cold things are cyrillic. If something is vapourous and hearsay then it is bandy. White things are candid. If something is scentless then it is mysterious. Red things are scentless. Roby is not bandy.", "logic": "\nCandid(mallissa)\nHearsay(mallissa)\nVapourous(mallissa)\nCandid(loni)\nCyrillic(loni)\nHearsay(loni)\nVapourous(roby)\nforall x (Cyrillic(x) -> Scentless(x))\nforall x (Candid(x) -> Cyrillic(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and Hearsay(x) -> Bandy(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) -> Candid(x))\nforall x (Scentless(x) -> Mysterious(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) -> Scentless(x))\n\nnot Bandy(roby)\n\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and Hearsay(x) -> Bandy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Yehudi is rusty. Yehudi is refractory. Yehudi is whacky. Beatrix is rusty. Beatrix is bullish. Beatrix is refractory. Marris is whacky. If something is bullish then it is ungodly. Cold things are bullish. If something is whacky and refractory then it is uncaulked. White things are rusty. If something is ungodly then it is ovarian. Red things are ungodly. Beatrix is uncaulked.", "logic": "\nRusty(yehudi)\nRefractory(yehudi)\nWhacky(yehudi)\nRusty(beatrix)\nBullish(beatrix)\nRefractory(beatrix)\nWhacky(marris)\nforall x (Bullish(x) -> Ungodly(x))\nforall x (Rusty(x) -> Bullish(x))\nforall x (Whacky(x) and Refractory(x) -> Uncaulked(x))\nforall x (Whacky(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> Ovarian(x))\nforall x (Refractory(x) -> Ungodly(x))\n\nUncaulked(beatrix)\n\nforall x (Whacky(x) and Refractory(x) -> Uncaulked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Petrina is outward. Petrina is pederastic. Petrina is resounding. Louella is outward. Louella is dutiful. Louella is pederastic. Tedman is resounding. If something is dutiful then it is brummagem. Cold things are dutiful. If something is resounding and pederastic then it is secretory. White things are outward. If something is brummagem then it is lascivious. Red things are brummagem. Tedman is not pederastic.", "logic": "\nOutward(petrina)\nPederastic(petrina)\nResounding(petrina)\nOutward(louella)\nDutiful(louella)\nPederastic(louella)\nResounding(tedman)\nforall x (Dutiful(x) -> Brummagem(x))\nforall x (Outward(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Resounding(x) and Pederastic(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Resounding(x) -> Outward(x))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nforall x (Pederastic(x) -> Brummagem(x))\n\nnot Pederastic(tedman)\n\nnot Pederastic(tedman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Imelda is accumbent. Imelda is herculean. Imelda is focal. Saba is accumbent. Saba is bilateral. Saba is herculean. Guenna is focal. If something is bilateral then it is boffo. Cold things are bilateral. If something is focal and herculean then it is threatened. White things are accumbent. If something is boffo then it is rugged. Red things are boffo. Saba is focal.", "logic": "\nAccumbent(imelda)\nHerculean(imelda)\nFocal(imelda)\nAccumbent(saba)\nBilateral(saba)\nHerculean(saba)\nFocal(guenna)\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Accumbent(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) and Herculean(x) -> Threatened(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Accumbent(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) -> Rugged(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) -> Boffo(x))\n\nFocal(saba)\n\nFocal(saba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "The cosetta jostle the haskell. The haskell jostle the cosetta. If the haskell jostle the cosetta and the haskell is fordable then the cosetta empty the haskell. If someone empty the haskell then the haskell is repellent. If someone jostle the cosetta and the cosetta jostle the haskell then the haskell is fordable. The cosetta jostle the haskell.", "logic": "\nJostle(cosetta, haskell)\nJostle(haskell, cosetta)\nJostle(haskell, cosetta) and Fordable(haskell) -> Empty(cosetta, haskell)\nforall x (Empty(x, haskell) -> Repellent(haskell))\nforall x (Jostle(x, cosetta) and Jostle(cosetta, haskell) -> Fordable(haskell))\n\nJostle(cosetta, haskell)\n\ntherefore Jostle(cosetta, haskell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The dyana conjoin the eda. The eda conjoin the dyana. If the eda conjoin the dyana and the eda is ceilinged then the dyana luminesce the eda. If someone luminesce the eda then the eda is conjoined. If someone conjoin the dyana and the dyana conjoin the eda then the eda is ceilinged. The dyana does not visit the eda.", "logic": "\nConjoin(dyana, eda)\nConjoin(eda, dyana)\nConjoin(eda, dyana) and Ceilinged(eda) -> Luminesce(dyana, eda)\nforall x (Luminesce(x, eda) -> Conjoined(eda))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, dyana) and Conjoin(dyana, eda) -> Ceilinged(eda))\n\nnot Conjoin(dyana, eda)\n\ntherefore Conjoin(dyana, eda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The nikolia retain the verina. The verina retain the nikolia. If the verina retain the nikolia and the verina is capital then the nikolia cozen the verina. If someone cozen the verina then the verina is cockeyed. If someone retain the nikolia and the nikolia retain the verina then the verina is capital. The verina is capital.", "logic": "\nRetain(nikolia, verina)\nRetain(verina, nikolia)\nRetain(verina, nikolia) and Capital(verina) -> Cozen(nikolia, verina)\nforall x (Cozen(x, verina) -> Cockeyed(verina))\nforall x (Retain(x, nikolia) and Retain(nikolia, verina) -> Capital(verina))\n\nCapital(verina)\n\nRetain(verina, nikolia) and Retain(nikolia, verina) and forall x (Retain(x, nikolia) and Retain(nikolia, verina) -> Capital(verina)) -> therefore Capital(verina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The essa crimson the teresa. The teresa crimson the essa. If the teresa crimson the essa and the teresa is mucous then the essa saturate the teresa. If someone saturate the teresa then the teresa is colonic. If someone crimson the essa and the essa crimson the teresa then the teresa is mucous. The teresa is not mucous.", "logic": "\nCrimson(essa, teresa)\nCrimson(teresa, essa)\nCrimson(teresa, essa) and Mucous(teresa) -> Saturate(essa, teresa)\nforall x (Saturate(x, teresa) -> Colonic(teresa))\nforall x (Crimson(x, essa) and Crimson(essa, teresa) -> Mucous(teresa))\n\nnot Mucous(teresa)\n\nCrimson(teresa, essa) and Crimson(essa, teresa) and forall x (Crimson(x, essa) and Crimson(essa, teresa) -> Mucous(teresa)) -> therefore Mucous(teresa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The yanaton meander the tucky. The tucky meander the yanaton. If the tucky meander the yanaton and the tucky is realized then the yanaton licence the tucky. If someone licence the tucky then the tucky is asynergic. If someone meander the yanaton and the yanaton meander the tucky then the tucky is realized. The yanaton licence the tucky.", "logic": "\nMeander(yanaton, tucky)\nMeander(tucky, yanaton)\nMeander(tucky, yanaton) and Realized(tucky) -> Licence(yanaton, tucky)\nforall x (Licence(x, tucky) -> Asynergic(tucky))\nforall x (Meander(x, yanaton) and Meander(yanaton, tucky) -> Realized(tucky))\n\nLicence(yanaton, tucky)\n\nMeander(tucky, yanaton) and Meander(yanaton, tucky) and forall x (Meander(x, yanaton) and Meander(yanaton, tucky) -> Realized(tucky)) -> therefore Realized(tucky) Meander(tucky, yanaton) and Realized(tucky) and Meander(tucky, yanaton) and Realized(tucky) -> Licence(yanaton, tucky) -> therefore Licence(yanaton, tucky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The polly psalm the dusty. The dusty psalm the polly. If the dusty psalm the polly and the dusty is sapphic then the polly slime the dusty. If someone slime the dusty then the dusty is affable. If someone psalm the polly and the polly psalm the dusty then the dusty is sapphic. The polly does not chase the dusty.", "logic": "\nPsalm(polly, dusty)\nPsalm(dusty, polly)\nPsalm(dusty, polly) and Sapphic(dusty) -> Slime(polly, dusty)\nforall x (Slime(x, dusty) -> Affable(dusty))\nforall x (Psalm(x, polly) and Psalm(polly, dusty) -> Sapphic(dusty))\n\nnot Slime(polly, dusty)\n\nPsalm(dusty, polly) and Psalm(polly, dusty) and forall x (Psalm(x, polly) and Psalm(polly, dusty) -> Sapphic(dusty)) -> therefore Sapphic(dusty) Psalm(dusty, polly) and Sapphic(dusty) and Psalm(dusty, polly) and Sapphic(dusty) -> Slime(polly, dusty) -> therefore Slime(polly, dusty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The zollie spend the torin. The torin spend the zollie. If the torin spend the zollie and the torin is developing then the zollie rival the torin. If someone rival the torin then the torin is biweekly. If someone spend the zollie and the zollie spend the torin then the torin is developing. The torin is biweekly.", "logic": "\nSpend(zollie, torin)\nSpend(torin, zollie)\nSpend(torin, zollie) and Developing(torin) -> Rival(zollie, torin)\nforall x (Rival(x, torin) -> Biweekly(torin))\nforall x (Spend(x, zollie) and Spend(zollie, torin) -> Developing(torin))\n\nBiweekly(torin)\n\nSpend(torin, zollie) and Spend(zollie, torin) and forall x (Spend(x, zollie) and Spend(zollie, torin) -> Developing(torin)) -> therefore Developing(torin) Spend(torin, zollie) and Developing(torin) and Spend(torin, zollie) and Developing(torin) -> Rival(zollie, torin) -> therefore Rival(zollie, torin) Rival(zollie, torin) and forall x (Rival(x, torin) -> Biweekly(torin)) -> therefore Biweekly(torin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The nessi perorate the rubie. The rubie perorate the nessi. If the rubie perorate the nessi and the rubie is unnumbered then the nessi discount the rubie. If someone discount the rubie then the rubie is crested. If someone perorate the nessi and the nessi perorate the rubie then the rubie is unnumbered. The rubie is not crested.", "logic": "\nPerorate(nessi, rubie)\nPerorate(rubie, nessi)\nPerorate(rubie, nessi) and Unnumbered(rubie) -> Discount(nessi, rubie)\nforall x (Discount(x, rubie) -> Crested(rubie))\nforall x (Perorate(x, nessi) and Perorate(nessi, rubie) -> Unnumbered(rubie))\n\nnot Crested(rubie)\n\nPerorate(rubie, nessi) and Perorate(nessi, rubie) and forall x (Perorate(x, nessi) and Perorate(nessi, rubie) -> Unnumbered(rubie)) -> therefore Unnumbered(rubie) Perorate(rubie, nessi) and Unnumbered(rubie) and Perorate(rubie, nessi) and Unnumbered(rubie) -> Discount(nessi, rubie) -> therefore Discount(nessi, rubie) Discount(nessi, rubie) and forall x (Discount(x, rubie) -> Crested(rubie)) -> therefore Crested(rubie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The kathryne scranch the trudi. The trudi scranch the kathryne. If the trudi scranch the kathryne and the trudi is residuary then the kathryne partition the trudi. If someone partition the trudi then the trudi is rhombic. If someone scranch the kathryne and the kathryne scranch the trudi then the trudi is residuary. The kathryne is not nice.", "logic": "\nScranch(kathryne, trudi)\nScranch(trudi, kathryne)\nScranch(trudi, kathryne) and Residuary(trudi) -> Partition(kathryne, trudi)\nforall x (Partition(x, trudi) -> Rhombic(trudi))\nforall x (Scranch(x, kathryne) and Scranch(kathryne, trudi) -> Residuary(trudi))\n\nnot Nice(kathryne)\n\nnot Nice(kathryne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The ferguson load the gwen. The gwen load the ferguson. If the gwen load the ferguson and the gwen is arid then the ferguson disk the gwen. If someone disk the gwen then the gwen is unranked. If someone load the ferguson and the ferguson load the gwen then the gwen is arid. The ferguson disk the ferguson.", "logic": "\nLoad(ferguson, gwen)\nLoad(gwen, ferguson)\nLoad(gwen, ferguson) and Arid(gwen) -> Disk(ferguson, gwen)\nforall x (Disk(x, gwen) -> Unranked(gwen))\nforall x (Load(x, ferguson) and Load(ferguson, gwen) -> Arid(gwen))\n\nDisk(ferguson, ferguson)\n\nDisk(ferguson, ferguson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The taddeo thicken the josephina. The josephina thicken the taddeo. If the josephina thicken the taddeo and the josephina is reflecting then the taddeo spit the josephina. If someone spit the josephina then the josephina is bandy. If someone thicken the taddeo and the taddeo thicken the josephina then the josephina is reflecting. The taddeo is not cold.", "logic": "\nThicken(taddeo, josephina)\nThicken(josephina, taddeo)\nThicken(josephina, taddeo) and Reflecting(josephina) -> Spit(taddeo, josephina)\nforall x (Spit(x, josephina) -> Bandy(josephina))\nforall x (Thicken(x, taddeo) and Thicken(taddeo, josephina) -> Reflecting(josephina))\n\nnot Cold(taddeo)\n\nnot Cold(taddeo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The lian homer the jerrilee. The jerrilee homer the lian. If the jerrilee homer the lian and the jerrilee is dactylic then the lian putty the jerrilee. If someone putty the jerrilee then the jerrilee is accumbent. If someone homer the lian and the lian homer the jerrilee then the jerrilee is dactylic. The jerrilee sees the jerrilee.", "logic": "\nHomer(lian, jerrilee)\nHomer(jerrilee, lian)\nHomer(jerrilee, lian) and Dactylic(jerrilee) -> Putty(lian, jerrilee)\nforall x (Putty(x, jerrilee) -> Accumbent(jerrilee))\nforall x (Homer(x, lian) and Homer(lian, jerrilee) -> Dactylic(jerrilee))\n\nSees(jerrilee, jerrilee)\n\nSees(jerrilee, jerrilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The kynthia stink the emmett. The emmett stink the kynthia. If the emmett stink the kynthia and the emmett is seasoned then the kynthia embed the emmett. If someone embed the emmett then the emmett is cringing. If someone stink the kynthia and the kynthia stink the emmett then the emmett is seasoned. The kynthia does not see the emmett.", "logic": "\nStink(kynthia, emmett)\nStink(emmett, kynthia)\nStink(emmett, kynthia) and Seasoned(emmett) -> Embed(kynthia, emmett)\nforall x (Embed(x, emmett) -> Cringing(emmett))\nforall x (Stink(x, kynthia) and Stink(kynthia, emmett) -> Seasoned(emmett))\n\nnot Sees(kynthia, emmett)\n\nnot Sees(kynthia, emmett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The jammie communize the alfonzo. The alfonzo communize the jammie. If the alfonzo communize the jammie and the alfonzo is sensorial then the jammie bisect the alfonzo. If someone bisect the alfonzo then the alfonzo is cloven. If someone communize the jammie and the jammie communize the alfonzo then the alfonzo is sensorial. The alfonzo bisect the alfonzo.", "logic": "\nCommunize(jammie, alfonzo)\nCommunize(alfonzo, jammie)\nCommunize(alfonzo, jammie) and Sensorial(alfonzo) -> Bisect(jammie, alfonzo)\nforall x (Bisect(x, alfonzo) -> Cloven(alfonzo))\nforall x (Communize(x, jammie) and Communize(jammie, alfonzo) -> Sensorial(alfonzo))\n\nBisect(alfonzo, alfonzo)\n\nBisect(alfonzo, alfonzo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The sanderson swamp the morly. The morly swamp the sanderson. If the morly swamp the sanderson and the morly is teased then the sanderson separate the morly. If someone separate the morly then the morly is broadband. If someone swamp the sanderson and the sanderson swamp the morly then the morly is teased. The morly does not see the sanderson.", "logic": "\nSwamp(sanderson, morly)\nSwamp(morly, sanderson)\nSwamp(morly, sanderson) and Teased(morly) -> Separate(sanderson, morly)\nforall x (Separate(x, morly) -> Broadband(morly))\nforall x (Swamp(x, sanderson) and Swamp(sanderson, morly) -> Teased(morly))\n\nnot Sees(morly, sanderson)\n\nnot Sees(morly, sanderson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The wilburn weld the carolann. The carolann weld the wilburn. If the carolann weld the wilburn and the carolann is goosey then the wilburn green the carolann. If someone green the carolann then the carolann is gratified. If someone weld the wilburn and the wilburn weld the carolann then the carolann is goosey. The carolann weld the carolann.", "logic": "\nWeld(wilburn, carolann)\nWeld(carolann, wilburn)\nWeld(carolann, wilburn) and Goosey(carolann) -> Green(wilburn, carolann)\nforall x (Green(x, carolann) -> Gratified(carolann))\nforall x (Weld(x, wilburn) and Weld(wilburn, carolann) -> Goosey(carolann))\n\nWeld(carolann, carolann)\n\nWeld(carolann, carolann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "Ozzy is infirm. Ozzy is cragfast. Ozzy is dominant. All shelflike, maidenlike people are cragfast. All mono, avellan people are maidenlike. If someone is shelflike then they are cragfast. Big, maidenlike people are avellan. If Ozzy is infirm then Ozzy is maidenlike. Furry, shelflike people are avellan. White people are shelflike. All avellan, maidenlike people are dominant. Ozzy is cragfast.", "logic": "\nInfirm(ozzy)\nCragfast(ozzy)\nDominant(ozzy)\nforall x (Shelflike(x) and Maidenlike(x) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Mono(x) and Avellan(x) -> Maidenlike(x))\nforall x (Shelflike(x) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Shelflike(x) and Maidenlike(x) -> Avellan(x))\nInfirm(ozzy) -> Maidenlike(ozzy)\nforall x (Mono(x) and Shelflike(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Maidenlike(x) -> Shelflike(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and Maidenlike(x) -> Dominant(x))\n\nCragfast(ozzy)\n\ntherefore Cragfast(ozzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Merrie is ahorse. Merrie is petite. Merrie is wrothful. All unlit, cumbrous people are petite. All cesarian, patronized people are cumbrous. If someone is unlit then they are petite. Big, cumbrous people are patronized. If Merrie is ahorse then Merrie is cumbrous. Furry, unlit people are patronized. White people are unlit. All patronized, cumbrous people are wrothful. Merrie is not ahorse.", "logic": "\nAhorse(merrie)\nPetite(merrie)\nWrothful(merrie)\nforall x (Unlit(x) and Cumbrous(x) -> Petite(x))\nforall x (Cesarian(x) and Patronized(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nforall x (Unlit(x) -> Petite(x))\nforall x (Unlit(x) and Cumbrous(x) -> Patronized(x))\nAhorse(merrie) -> Cumbrous(merrie)\nforall x (Cesarian(x) and Unlit(x) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Unlit(x))\nforall x (Patronized(x) and Cumbrous(x) -> Wrothful(x))\n\nnot Ahorse(merrie)\n\ntherefore Ahorse(merrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Orion is fencelike. Orion is lyrate. Orion is areal. All azotemic, oppressive people are lyrate. All woody, feathered people are oppressive. If someone is azotemic then they are lyrate. Big, oppressive people are feathered. If Orion is fencelike then Orion is oppressive. Furry, azotemic people are feathered. White people are azotemic. All feathered, oppressive people are areal. Orion is oppressive.", "logic": "\nFencelike(orion)\nLyrate(orion)\nAreal(orion)\nforall x (Azotemic(x) and Oppressive(x) -> Lyrate(x))\nforall x (Woody(x) and Feathered(x) -> Oppressive(x))\nforall x (Azotemic(x) -> Lyrate(x))\nforall x (Azotemic(x) and Oppressive(x) -> Feathered(x))\nFencelike(orion) -> Oppressive(orion)\nforall x (Woody(x) and Azotemic(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Oppressive(x) -> Azotemic(x))\nforall x (Feathered(x) and Oppressive(x) -> Areal(x))\n\nOppressive(orion)\n\nFencelike(orion) and Fencelike(orion) -> Oppressive(orion) -> therefore Oppressive(orion)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Adrian is modeled. Adrian is neutral. Adrian is adscripted. All burdensome, orangish people are neutral. All plangent, erasmian people are orangish. If someone is burdensome then they are neutral. Big, orangish people are erasmian. If Adrian is modeled then Adrian is orangish. Furry, burdensome people are erasmian. White people are burdensome. All erasmian, orangish people are adscripted. Adrian is not orangish.", "logic": "\nModeled(adrian)\nNeutral(adrian)\nAdscripted(adrian)\nforall x (Burdensome(x) and Orangish(x) -> Neutral(x))\nforall x (Plangent(x) and Erasmian(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Burdensome(x) -> Neutral(x))\nforall x (Burdensome(x) and Orangish(x) -> Erasmian(x))\nModeled(adrian) -> Orangish(adrian)\nforall x (Plangent(x) and Burdensome(x) -> Erasmian(x))\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Erasmian(x) and Orangish(x) -> Adscripted(x))\n\nnot Orangish(adrian)\n\nModeled(adrian) and Modeled(adrian) -> Orangish(adrian) -> therefore Orangish(adrian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Lester is hackneyed. Lester is autogenous. Lester is pyknotic. All deistic, screaming people are autogenous. All stinky, pregnant people are screaming. If someone is deistic then they are autogenous. Big, screaming people are pregnant. If Lester is hackneyed then Lester is screaming. Furry, deistic people are pregnant. White people are deistic. All pregnant, screaming people are pyknotic. Lester is deistic.", "logic": "\nHackneyed(lester)\nAutogenous(lester)\nPyknotic(lester)\nforall x (Deistic(x) and Screaming(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) and Pregnant(x) -> Screaming(x))\nforall x (Deistic(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Deistic(x) and Screaming(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nHackneyed(lester) -> Screaming(lester)\nforall x (Stinky(x) and Deistic(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Screaming(x) -> Deistic(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) and Screaming(x) -> Pyknotic(x))\n\nDeistic(lester)\n\nHackneyed(lester) and Hackneyed(lester) -> Screaming(lester) -> therefore Screaming(lester) Screaming(lester) and forall x (Screaming(x) -> Deistic(x)) -> therefore Deistic(lester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Lorianna is raining. Lorianna is unsent. Lorianna is inscribed. All guarded, momentous people are unsent. All cuddly, spinous people are momentous. If someone is guarded then they are unsent. Big, momentous people are spinous. If Lorianna is raining then Lorianna is momentous. Furry, guarded people are spinous. White people are guarded. All spinous, momentous people are inscribed. Lorianna is not guarded.", "logic": "\nRaining(lorianna)\nUnsent(lorianna)\nInscribed(lorianna)\nforall x (Guarded(x) and Momentous(x) -> Unsent(x))\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and Spinous(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Unsent(x))\nforall x (Guarded(x) and Momentous(x) -> Spinous(x))\nRaining(lorianna) -> Momentous(lorianna)\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and Guarded(x) -> Spinous(x))\nforall x (Momentous(x) -> Guarded(x))\nforall x (Spinous(x) and Momentous(x) -> Inscribed(x))\n\nnot Guarded(lorianna)\n\nRaining(lorianna) and Raining(lorianna) -> Momentous(lorianna) -> therefore Momentous(lorianna) Momentous(lorianna) and forall x (Momentous(x) -> Guarded(x)) -> therefore Guarded(lorianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Cyndi is momentous. Cyndi is jaggy. Cyndi is previous. All stern, flammable people are jaggy. All seditious, tortured people are flammable. If someone is stern then they are jaggy. Big, flammable people are tortured. If Cyndi is momentous then Cyndi is flammable. Furry, stern people are tortured. White people are stern. All tortured, flammable people are previous. Cyndi is tortured.", "logic": "\nMomentous(cyndi)\nJaggy(cyndi)\nPrevious(cyndi)\nforall x (Stern(x) and Flammable(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nforall x (Seditious(x) and Tortured(x) -> Flammable(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) and Flammable(x) -> Tortured(x))\nMomentous(cyndi) -> Flammable(cyndi)\nforall x (Seditious(x) and Stern(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Tortured(x) and Flammable(x) -> Previous(x))\n\nTortured(cyndi)\n\nMomentous(cyndi) and Momentous(cyndi) -> Flammable(cyndi) -> therefore Flammable(cyndi) Flammable(cyndi) and forall x (Flammable(x) -> Stern(x)) -> therefore Stern(cyndi) Momentous(cyndi) and Momentous(cyndi) -> Flammable(cyndi) -> therefore Flammable(cyndi) Stern(cyndi) and Flammable(cyndi) and forall x (Stern(x) and Flammable(x) -> Tortured(x)) -> therefore Tortured(cyndi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Jeromy is imbalanced. Jeromy is germinal. Jeromy is lymphatic. All traitorous, raising people are germinal. All rabbinic, punic people are raising. If someone is traitorous then they are germinal. Big, raising people are punic. If Jeromy is imbalanced then Jeromy is raising. Furry, traitorous people are punic. White people are traitorous. All punic, raising people are lymphatic. Jeromy is not punic.", "logic": "\nImbalanced(jeromy)\nGerminal(jeromy)\nLymphatic(jeromy)\nforall x (Traitorous(x) and Raising(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) and Punic(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Traitorous(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Traitorous(x) and Raising(x) -> Punic(x))\nImbalanced(jeromy) -> Raising(jeromy)\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) and Traitorous(x) -> Punic(x))\nforall x (Raising(x) -> Traitorous(x))\nforall x (Punic(x) and Raising(x) -> Lymphatic(x))\n\nnot Punic(jeromy)\n\nImbalanced(jeromy) and Imbalanced(jeromy) -> Raising(jeromy) -> therefore Raising(jeromy) Raising(jeromy) and forall x (Raising(x) -> Traitorous(x)) -> therefore Traitorous(jeromy) Imbalanced(jeromy) and Imbalanced(jeromy) -> Raising(jeromy) -> therefore Raising(jeromy) Traitorous(jeromy) and Raising(jeromy) and forall x (Traitorous(x) and Raising(x) -> Punic(x)) -> therefore Punic(jeromy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "The jodi is hammy. The jodi is stillborn. The jodi is enthralled. The jodi ford the maurine. The jodi expunge the maurine. The jodi does not visit the maurine. The maurine is numbing. The maurine is hammy. The maurine is not loveless. The maurine ford the jodi. The maurine expunge the jodi. The maurine plough the jodi. If someone plough the jodi and they are not loveless then the jodi ford the maurine. If someone is enthralled then they like the jodi. If someone is stillborn then they visit the jodi. If someone expunge the jodi then they are numbing. If someone plough the maurine and the maurine ford the jodi then the maurine expunge the jodi. If someone plough the jodi and they are enthralled then they see the jodi. If someone is loveless then they do not see the jodi. If the maurine plough the jodi and the maurine does not see the jodi then the jodi is hammy. The maurine ford the jodi.", "logic": "\nHammy(jodi)\nStillborn(jodi)\nEnthralled(jodi)\nFord(jodi, maurine)\nExpunge(jodi, maurine)\nnot Plough(jodi, maurine)\nNumbing(maurine)\nHammy(maurine)\nnot Loveless(maurine)\nFord(maurine, jodi)\nExpunge(maurine, jodi)\nPlough(maurine, jodi)\nforall x (Plough(x, jodi) and not Loveless(x) -> Ford(jodi, maurine))\nforall x (Enthralled(x) -> Ford(x, jodi))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Plough(x, jodi))\nforall x (Expunge(x, jodi) -> Numbing(x))\nforall x (Plough(x, maurine) and Ford(maurine, jodi) -> Expunge(maurine, jodi))\nforall x (Plough(x, jodi) and Enthralled(x) -> Expunge(x, jodi))\nforall x (Loveless(x) -> not Expunge(x, jodi))\nPlough(maurine, jodi) and not Expunge(maurine, jodi) -> Hammy(jodi)\n\nFord(maurine, jodi)\n\ntherefore Ford(maurine, jodi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The eolande is anodal. The eolande is shrinkable. The eolande is utility. The eolande attemper the uta. The eolande refurbish the uta. The eolande does not visit the uta. The uta is diplomatic. The uta is anodal. The uta is not fucking. The uta attemper the eolande. The uta refurbish the eolande. The uta cocker the eolande. If someone cocker the eolande and they are not fucking then the eolande attemper the uta. If someone is utility then they like the eolande. If someone is shrinkable then they visit the eolande. If someone refurbish the eolande then they are diplomatic. If someone cocker the uta and the uta attemper the eolande then the uta refurbish the eolande. If someone cocker the eolande and they are utility then they see the eolande. If someone is fucking then they do not see the eolande. If the uta cocker the eolande and the uta does not see the eolande then the eolande is anodal. The uta is fucking.", "logic": "\nAnodal(eolande)\nShrinkable(eolande)\nUtility(eolande)\nAttemper(eolande, uta)\nRefurbish(eolande, uta)\nnot Cocker(eolande, uta)\nDiplomatic(uta)\nAnodal(uta)\nnot Fucking(uta)\nAttemper(uta, eolande)\nRefurbish(uta, eolande)\nCocker(uta, eolande)\nforall x (Cocker(x, eolande) and not Fucking(x) -> Attemper(eolande, uta))\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Attemper(x, eolande))\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) -> Cocker(x, eolande))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, eolande) -> Diplomatic(x))\nforall x (Cocker(x, uta) and Attemper(uta, eolande) -> Refurbish(uta, eolande))\nforall x (Cocker(x, eolande) and Utility(x) -> Refurbish(x, eolande))\nforall x (Fucking(x) -> not Refurbish(x, eolande))\nCocker(uta, eolande) and not Refurbish(uta, eolande) -> Anodal(eolande)\n\nFucking(uta)\n\ntherefore not Fucking(uta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The rebecka is bouncing. The rebecka is lowbrowed. The rebecka is inverse. The rebecka terminate the gavrielle. The rebecka clout the gavrielle. The rebecka does not visit the gavrielle. The gavrielle is neonatal. The gavrielle is bouncing. The gavrielle is not roman. The gavrielle terminate the rebecka. The gavrielle clout the rebecka. The gavrielle scour the rebecka. If someone scour the rebecka and they are not roman then the rebecka terminate the gavrielle. If someone is inverse then they like the rebecka. If someone is lowbrowed then they visit the rebecka. If someone clout the rebecka then they are neonatal. If someone scour the gavrielle and the gavrielle terminate the rebecka then the gavrielle clout the rebecka. If someone scour the rebecka and they are inverse then they see the rebecka. If someone is roman then they do not see the rebecka. If the gavrielle scour the rebecka and the gavrielle does not see the rebecka then the rebecka is bouncing. The rebecka terminate the rebecka.", "logic": "\nBouncing(rebecka)\nLowbrowed(rebecka)\nInverse(rebecka)\nTerminate(rebecka, gavrielle)\nClout(rebecka, gavrielle)\nnot Scour(rebecka, gavrielle)\nNeonatal(gavrielle)\nBouncing(gavrielle)\nnot Roman(gavrielle)\nTerminate(gavrielle, rebecka)\nClout(gavrielle, rebecka)\nScour(gavrielle, rebecka)\nforall x (Scour(x, rebecka) and not Roman(x) -> Terminate(rebecka, gavrielle))\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Terminate(x, rebecka))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) -> Scour(x, rebecka))\nforall x (Clout(x, rebecka) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Scour(x, gavrielle) and Terminate(gavrielle, rebecka) -> Clout(gavrielle, rebecka))\nforall x (Scour(x, rebecka) and Inverse(x) -> Clout(x, rebecka))\nforall x (Roman(x) -> not Clout(x, rebecka))\nScour(gavrielle, rebecka) and not Clout(gavrielle, rebecka) -> Bouncing(rebecka)\n\nTerminate(rebecka, rebecka)\n\nInverse(rebecka) and forall x (Inverse(x) -> Terminate(x, rebecka)) -> therefore Terminate(rebecka, rebecka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The ericha is imaginary. The ericha is geothermal. The ericha is popish. The ericha polemicise the celestyna. The ericha galumph the celestyna. The ericha does not visit the celestyna. The celestyna is nervous. The celestyna is imaginary. The celestyna is not flexible. The celestyna polemicise the ericha. The celestyna galumph the ericha. The celestyna export the ericha. If someone export the ericha and they are not flexible then the ericha polemicise the celestyna. If someone is popish then they like the ericha. If someone is geothermal then they visit the ericha. If someone galumph the ericha then they are nervous. If someone export the celestyna and the celestyna polemicise the ericha then the celestyna galumph the ericha. If someone export the ericha and they are popish then they see the ericha. If someone is flexible then they do not see the ericha. If the celestyna export the ericha and the celestyna does not see the ericha then the ericha is imaginary. The ericha does not visit the ericha.", "logic": "\nImaginary(ericha)\nGeothermal(ericha)\nPopish(ericha)\nPolemicise(ericha, celestyna)\nGalumph(ericha, celestyna)\nnot Export(ericha, celestyna)\nNervous(celestyna)\nImaginary(celestyna)\nnot Flexible(celestyna)\nPolemicise(celestyna, ericha)\nGalumph(celestyna, ericha)\nExport(celestyna, ericha)\nforall x (Export(x, ericha) and not Flexible(x) -> Polemicise(ericha, celestyna))\nforall x (Popish(x) -> Polemicise(x, ericha))\nforall x (Geothermal(x) -> Export(x, ericha))\nforall x (Galumph(x, ericha) -> Nervous(x))\nforall x (Export(x, celestyna) and Polemicise(celestyna, ericha) -> Galumph(celestyna, ericha))\nforall x (Export(x, ericha) and Popish(x) -> Galumph(x, ericha))\nforall x (Flexible(x) -> not Galumph(x, ericha))\nExport(celestyna, ericha) and not Galumph(celestyna, ericha) -> Imaginary(ericha)\n\nnot Export(ericha, ericha)\n\nGeothermal(ericha) and forall x (Geothermal(x) -> Export(x, ericha)) -> therefore Export(ericha, ericha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The vitia is crenulate. The vitia is retral. The vitia is escaped. The vitia wither the jerrome. The vitia shed the jerrome. The vitia does not visit the jerrome. The jerrome is reversible. The jerrome is crenulate. The jerrome is not trusting. The jerrome wither the vitia. The jerrome shed the vitia. The jerrome stereotype the vitia. If someone stereotype the vitia and they are not trusting then the vitia wither the jerrome. If someone is escaped then they like the vitia. If someone is retral then they visit the vitia. If someone shed the vitia then they are reversible. If someone stereotype the jerrome and the jerrome wither the vitia then the jerrome shed the vitia. If someone stereotype the vitia and they are escaped then they see the vitia. If someone is trusting then they do not see the vitia. If the jerrome stereotype the vitia and the jerrome does not see the vitia then the vitia is crenulate. The vitia shed the vitia.", "logic": "\nCrenulate(vitia)\nRetral(vitia)\nEscaped(vitia)\nWither(vitia, jerrome)\nShed(vitia, jerrome)\nnot Stereotype(vitia, jerrome)\nReversible(jerrome)\nCrenulate(jerrome)\nnot Trusting(jerrome)\nWither(jerrome, vitia)\nShed(jerrome, vitia)\nStereotype(jerrome, vitia)\nforall x (Stereotype(x, vitia) and not Trusting(x) -> Wither(vitia, jerrome))\nforall x (Escaped(x) -> Wither(x, vitia))\nforall x (Retral(x) -> Stereotype(x, vitia))\nforall x (Shed(x, vitia) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, jerrome) and Wither(jerrome, vitia) -> Shed(jerrome, vitia))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, vitia) and Escaped(x) -> Shed(x, vitia))\nforall x (Trusting(x) -> not Shed(x, vitia))\nStereotype(jerrome, vitia) and not Shed(jerrome, vitia) -> Crenulate(vitia)\n\nShed(vitia, vitia)\n\nRetral(vitia) and forall x (Retral(x) -> Stereotype(x, vitia)) -> therefore Stereotype(vitia, vitia) Stereotype(vitia, vitia) and Escaped(vitia) and forall x (Stereotype(x, vitia) and Escaped(x) -> Shed(x, vitia)) -> therefore Shed(vitia, vitia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The marry is medieval. The marry is carbuncled. The marry is relevant. The marry shmooze the sheela. The marry ladder the sheela. The marry does not visit the sheela. The sheela is insectan. The sheela is medieval. The sheela is not poltroon. The sheela shmooze the marry. The sheela ladder the marry. The sheela cobble the marry. If someone cobble the marry and they are not poltroon then the marry shmooze the sheela. If someone is relevant then they like the marry. If someone is carbuncled then they visit the marry. If someone ladder the marry then they are insectan. If someone cobble the sheela and the sheela shmooze the marry then the sheela ladder the marry. If someone cobble the marry and they are relevant then they see the marry. If someone is poltroon then they do not see the marry. If the sheela cobble the marry and the sheela does not see the marry then the marry is medieval. The marry does not see the marry.", "logic": "\nMedieval(marry)\nCarbuncled(marry)\nRelevant(marry)\nShmooze(marry, sheela)\nLadder(marry, sheela)\nnot Cobble(marry, sheela)\nInsectan(sheela)\nMedieval(sheela)\nnot Poltroon(sheela)\nShmooze(sheela, marry)\nLadder(sheela, marry)\nCobble(sheela, marry)\nforall x (Cobble(x, marry) and not Poltroon(x) -> Shmooze(marry, sheela))\nforall x (Relevant(x) -> Shmooze(x, marry))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Cobble(x, marry))\nforall x (Ladder(x, marry) -> Insectan(x))\nforall x (Cobble(x, sheela) and Shmooze(sheela, marry) -> Ladder(sheela, marry))\nforall x (Cobble(x, marry) and Relevant(x) -> Ladder(x, marry))\nforall x (Poltroon(x) -> not Ladder(x, marry))\nCobble(sheela, marry) and not Ladder(sheela, marry) -> Medieval(marry)\n\nnot Ladder(marry, marry)\n\nCarbuncled(marry) and forall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Cobble(x, marry)) -> therefore Cobble(marry, marry) Cobble(marry, marry) and Relevant(marry) and forall x (Cobble(x, marry) and Relevant(x) -> Ladder(x, marry)) -> therefore Ladder(marry, marry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The skippy is negotiable. The skippy is summative. The skippy is ascitic. The skippy feud the joann. The skippy blackjack the joann. The skippy does not visit the joann. The joann is metastable. The joann is negotiable. The joann is not screwball. The joann feud the skippy. The joann blackjack the skippy. The joann deflagrate the skippy. If someone deflagrate the skippy and they are not screwball then the skippy feud the joann. If someone is ascitic then they like the skippy. If someone is summative then they visit the skippy. If someone blackjack the skippy then they are metastable. If someone deflagrate the joann and the joann feud the skippy then the joann blackjack the skippy. If someone deflagrate the skippy and they are ascitic then they see the skippy. If someone is screwball then they do not see the skippy. If the joann deflagrate the skippy and the joann does not see the skippy then the skippy is negotiable. The skippy is metastable.", "logic": "\nNegotiable(skippy)\nSummative(skippy)\nAscitic(skippy)\nFeud(skippy, joann)\nBlackjack(skippy, joann)\nnot Deflagrate(skippy, joann)\nMetastable(joann)\nNegotiable(joann)\nnot Screwball(joann)\nFeud(joann, skippy)\nBlackjack(joann, skippy)\nDeflagrate(joann, skippy)\nforall x (Deflagrate(x, skippy) and not Screwball(x) -> Feud(skippy, joann))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> Feud(x, skippy))\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Deflagrate(x, skippy))\nforall x (Blackjack(x, skippy) -> Metastable(x))\nforall x (Deflagrate(x, joann) and Feud(joann, skippy) -> Blackjack(joann, skippy))\nforall x (Deflagrate(x, skippy) and Ascitic(x) -> Blackjack(x, skippy))\nforall x (Screwball(x) -> not Blackjack(x, skippy))\nDeflagrate(joann, skippy) and not Blackjack(joann, skippy) -> Negotiable(skippy)\n\nMetastable(skippy)\n\nSummative(skippy) and forall x (Summative(x) -> Deflagrate(x, skippy)) -> therefore Deflagrate(skippy, skippy) Deflagrate(skippy, skippy) and Ascitic(skippy) and forall x (Deflagrate(x, skippy) and Ascitic(x) -> Blackjack(x, skippy)) -> therefore Blackjack(skippy, skippy) Blackjack(skippy, skippy) and forall x (Blackjack(x, skippy) -> Metastable(x)) -> therefore Metastable(skippy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The briana is fraternal. The briana is clxx. The briana is batwing. The briana copy the ernesto. The briana parallel the ernesto. The briana does not visit the ernesto. The ernesto is alienating. The ernesto is fraternal. The ernesto is not unwilling. The ernesto copy the briana. The ernesto parallel the briana. The ernesto straighten the briana. If someone straighten the briana and they are not unwilling then the briana copy the ernesto. If someone is batwing then they like the briana. If someone is clxx then they visit the briana. If someone parallel the briana then they are alienating. If someone straighten the ernesto and the ernesto copy the briana then the ernesto parallel the briana. If someone straighten the briana and they are batwing then they see the briana. If someone is unwilling then they do not see the briana. If the ernesto straighten the briana and the ernesto does not see the briana then the briana is fraternal. The briana is not alienating.", "logic": "\nFraternal(briana)\nClxx(briana)\nBatwing(briana)\nCopy(briana, ernesto)\nParallel(briana, ernesto)\nnot Straighten(briana, ernesto)\nAlienating(ernesto)\nFraternal(ernesto)\nnot Unwilling(ernesto)\nCopy(ernesto, briana)\nParallel(ernesto, briana)\nStraighten(ernesto, briana)\nforall x (Straighten(x, briana) and not Unwilling(x) -> Copy(briana, ernesto))\nforall x (Batwing(x) -> Copy(x, briana))\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Straighten(x, briana))\nforall x (Parallel(x, briana) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Straighten(x, ernesto) and Copy(ernesto, briana) -> Parallel(ernesto, briana))\nforall x (Straighten(x, briana) and Batwing(x) -> Parallel(x, briana))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) -> not Parallel(x, briana))\nStraighten(ernesto, briana) and not Parallel(ernesto, briana) -> Fraternal(briana)\n\nnot Alienating(briana)\n\nClxx(briana) and forall x (Clxx(x) -> Straighten(x, briana)) -> therefore Straighten(briana, briana) Straighten(briana, briana) and Batwing(briana) and forall x (Straighten(x, briana) and Batwing(x) -> Parallel(x, briana)) -> therefore Parallel(briana, briana) Parallel(briana, briana) and forall x (Parallel(x, briana) -> Alienating(x)) -> therefore Alienating(briana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The dinny is finite. The dinny is quadruped. The dinny is bottommost. The dinny disband the gamaliel. The dinny affiance the gamaliel. The dinny does not visit the gamaliel. The gamaliel is fugitive. The gamaliel is finite. The gamaliel is not framed. The gamaliel disband the dinny. The gamaliel affiance the dinny. The gamaliel defray the dinny. If someone defray the dinny and they are not framed then the dinny disband the gamaliel. If someone is bottommost then they like the dinny. If someone is quadruped then they visit the dinny. If someone affiance the dinny then they are fugitive. If someone defray the gamaliel and the gamaliel disband the dinny then the gamaliel affiance the dinny. If someone defray the dinny and they are bottommost then they see the dinny. If someone is framed then they do not see the dinny. If the gamaliel defray the dinny and the gamaliel does not see the dinny then the dinny is finite. The gamaliel does not like the gamaliel.", "logic": "\nFinite(dinny)\nQuadruped(dinny)\nBottommost(dinny)\nDisband(dinny, gamaliel)\nAffiance(dinny, gamaliel)\nnot Defray(dinny, gamaliel)\nFugitive(gamaliel)\nFinite(gamaliel)\nnot Framed(gamaliel)\nDisband(gamaliel, dinny)\nAffiance(gamaliel, dinny)\nDefray(gamaliel, dinny)\nforall x (Defray(x, dinny) and not Framed(x) -> Disband(dinny, gamaliel))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Disband(x, dinny))\nforall x (Quadruped(x) -> Defray(x, dinny))\nforall x (Affiance(x, dinny) -> Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Defray(x, gamaliel) and Disband(gamaliel, dinny) -> Affiance(gamaliel, dinny))\nforall x (Defray(x, dinny) and Bottommost(x) -> Affiance(x, dinny))\nforall x (Framed(x) -> not Affiance(x, dinny))\nDefray(gamaliel, dinny) and not Affiance(gamaliel, dinny) -> Finite(dinny)\n\nnot Disband(gamaliel, gamaliel)\n\nnot Disband(gamaliel, gamaliel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The othella is thrifty. The othella is blase. The othella is uncured. The othella barf the midge. The othella promenade the midge. The othella does not visit the midge. The midge is uppercase. The midge is thrifty. The midge is not tense. The midge barf the othella. The midge promenade the othella. The midge handcuff the othella. If someone handcuff the othella and they are not tense then the othella barf the midge. If someone is uncured then they like the othella. If someone is blase then they visit the othella. If someone promenade the othella then they are uppercase. If someone handcuff the midge and the midge barf the othella then the midge promenade the othella. If someone handcuff the othella and they are uncured then they see the othella. If someone is tense then they do not see the othella. If the midge handcuff the othella and the midge does not see the othella then the othella is thrifty. The midge handcuff the midge.", "logic": "\nThrifty(othella)\nBlase(othella)\nUncured(othella)\nBarf(othella, midge)\nPromenade(othella, midge)\nnot Handcuff(othella, midge)\nUppercase(midge)\nThrifty(midge)\nnot Tense(midge)\nBarf(midge, othella)\nPromenade(midge, othella)\nHandcuff(midge, othella)\nforall x (Handcuff(x, othella) and not Tense(x) -> Barf(othella, midge))\nforall x (Uncured(x) -> Barf(x, othella))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Handcuff(x, othella))\nforall x (Promenade(x, othella) -> Uppercase(x))\nforall x (Handcuff(x, midge) and Barf(midge, othella) -> Promenade(midge, othella))\nforall x (Handcuff(x, othella) and Uncured(x) -> Promenade(x, othella))\nforall x (Tense(x) -> not Promenade(x, othella))\nHandcuff(midge, othella) and not Promenade(midge, othella) -> Thrifty(othella)\n\nHandcuff(midge, midge)\n\nHandcuff(midge, midge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The amata is sidereal. The amata is twisted. The amata is diarrhoeic. The amata constipate the belle. The amata luxuriate the belle. The amata does not visit the belle. The belle is ototoxic. The belle is sidereal. The belle is not touching. The belle constipate the amata. The belle luxuriate the amata. The belle corrugate the amata. If someone corrugate the amata and they are not touching then the amata constipate the belle. If someone is diarrhoeic then they like the amata. If someone is twisted then they visit the amata. If someone luxuriate the amata then they are ototoxic. If someone corrugate the belle and the belle constipate the amata then the belle luxuriate the amata. If someone corrugate the amata and they are diarrhoeic then they see the amata. If someone is touching then they do not see the amata. If the belle corrugate the amata and the belle does not see the amata then the amata is sidereal. The belle does not see the belle.", "logic": "\nSidereal(amata)\nTwisted(amata)\nDiarrhoeic(amata)\nConstipate(amata, belle)\nLuxuriate(amata, belle)\nnot Corrugate(amata, belle)\nOtotoxic(belle)\nSidereal(belle)\nnot Touching(belle)\nConstipate(belle, amata)\nLuxuriate(belle, amata)\nCorrugate(belle, amata)\nforall x (Corrugate(x, amata) and not Touching(x) -> Constipate(amata, belle))\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) -> Constipate(x, amata))\nforall x (Twisted(x) -> Corrugate(x, amata))\nforall x (Luxuriate(x, amata) -> Ototoxic(x))\nforall x (Corrugate(x, belle) and Constipate(belle, amata) -> Luxuriate(belle, amata))\nforall x (Corrugate(x, amata) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Luxuriate(x, amata))\nforall x (Touching(x) -> not Luxuriate(x, amata))\nCorrugate(belle, amata) and not Luxuriate(belle, amata) -> Sidereal(amata)\n\nnot Luxuriate(belle, belle)\n\nnot Luxuriate(belle, belle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The gigi is kampuchean. The gigi is mailed. The gigi is dissonant. The gigi seek the josepha. The gigi overstock the josepha. The gigi does not visit the josepha. The josepha is online. The josepha is kampuchean. The josepha is not bareheaded. The josepha seek the gigi. The josepha overstock the gigi. The josepha tumble the gigi. If someone tumble the gigi and they are not bareheaded then the gigi seek the josepha. If someone is dissonant then they like the gigi. If someone is mailed then they visit the gigi. If someone overstock the gigi then they are online. If someone tumble the josepha and the josepha seek the gigi then the josepha overstock the gigi. If someone tumble the gigi and they are dissonant then they see the gigi. If someone is bareheaded then they do not see the gigi. If the josepha tumble the gigi and the josepha does not see the gigi then the gigi is kampuchean. The josepha is mailed.", "logic": "\nKampuchean(gigi)\nMailed(gigi)\nDissonant(gigi)\nSeek(gigi, josepha)\nOverstock(gigi, josepha)\nnot Tumble(gigi, josepha)\nOnline(josepha)\nKampuchean(josepha)\nnot Bareheaded(josepha)\nSeek(josepha, gigi)\nOverstock(josepha, gigi)\nTumble(josepha, gigi)\nforall x (Tumble(x, gigi) and not Bareheaded(x) -> Seek(gigi, josepha))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Seek(x, gigi))\nforall x (Mailed(x) -> Tumble(x, gigi))\nforall x (Overstock(x, gigi) -> Online(x))\nforall x (Tumble(x, josepha) and Seek(josepha, gigi) -> Overstock(josepha, gigi))\nforall x (Tumble(x, gigi) and Dissonant(x) -> Overstock(x, gigi))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) -> not Overstock(x, gigi))\nTumble(josepha, gigi) and not Overstock(josepha, gigi) -> Kampuchean(gigi)\n\nMailed(josepha)\n\nMailed(josepha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The allen is sleety. The allen is unapparent. The allen is doleful. The allen linearise the twila. The allen featherbed the twila. The allen does not visit the twila. The twila is onymous. The twila is sleety. The twila is not curved. The twila linearise the allen. The twila featherbed the allen. The twila cloture the allen. If someone cloture the allen and they are not curved then the allen linearise the twila. If someone is doleful then they like the allen. If someone is unapparent then they visit the allen. If someone featherbed the allen then they are onymous. If someone cloture the twila and the twila linearise the allen then the twila featherbed the allen. If someone cloture the allen and they are doleful then they see the allen. If someone is curved then they do not see the allen. If the twila cloture the allen and the twila does not see the allen then the allen is sleety. The twila is not doleful.", "logic": "\nSleety(allen)\nUnapparent(allen)\nDoleful(allen)\nLinearise(allen, twila)\nFeatherbed(allen, twila)\nnot Cloture(allen, twila)\nOnymous(twila)\nSleety(twila)\nnot Curved(twila)\nLinearise(twila, allen)\nFeatherbed(twila, allen)\nCloture(twila, allen)\nforall x (Cloture(x, allen) and not Curved(x) -> Linearise(allen, twila))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Linearise(x, allen))\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> Cloture(x, allen))\nforall x (Featherbed(x, allen) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Cloture(x, twila) and Linearise(twila, allen) -> Featherbed(twila, allen))\nforall x (Cloture(x, allen) and Doleful(x) -> Featherbed(x, allen))\nforall x (Curved(x) -> not Featherbed(x, allen))\nCloture(twila, allen) and not Featherbed(twila, allen) -> Sleety(allen)\n\nnot Doleful(twila)\n\nnot Doleful(twila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The agace is chordal. The agace is weblike. The agace is unpleasant. The agace upbraid the amity. The agace bustle the amity. The agace does not visit the amity. The amity is abridged. The amity is chordal. The amity is not shaping. The amity upbraid the agace. The amity bustle the agace. The amity weary the agace. If someone weary the agace and they are not shaping then the agace upbraid the amity. If someone is unpleasant then they like the agace. If someone is weblike then they visit the agace. If someone bustle the agace then they are abridged. If someone weary the amity and the amity upbraid the agace then the amity bustle the agace. If someone weary the agace and they are unpleasant then they see the agace. If someone is shaping then they do not see the agace. If the amity weary the agace and the amity does not see the agace then the agace is chordal. The agace is shaping.", "logic": "\nChordal(agace)\nWeblike(agace)\nUnpleasant(agace)\nUpbraid(agace, amity)\nBustle(agace, amity)\nnot Weary(agace, amity)\nAbridged(amity)\nChordal(amity)\nnot Shaping(amity)\nUpbraid(amity, agace)\nBustle(amity, agace)\nWeary(amity, agace)\nforall x (Weary(x, agace) and not Shaping(x) -> Upbraid(agace, amity))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Upbraid(x, agace))\nforall x (Weblike(x) -> Weary(x, agace))\nforall x (Bustle(x, agace) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Weary(x, amity) and Upbraid(amity, agace) -> Bustle(amity, agace))\nforall x (Weary(x, agace) and Unpleasant(x) -> Bustle(x, agace))\nforall x (Shaping(x) -> not Bustle(x, agace))\nWeary(amity, agace) and not Bustle(amity, agace) -> Chordal(agace)\n\nShaping(agace)\n\nShaping(agace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "Spiros is neuronic. Spiros is mincing. Trudy is coltish. Trudy is mincing. Bathsheba is unstarred. Bathsheba is aplitic. Bathsheba is homocyclic. White people are coltish. Round people are bicameral. If Bathsheba is aplitic then Bathsheba is homocyclic. If Spiros is aplitic then Spiros is homocyclic. If Spiros is neuronic and Spiros is bicameral then Spiros is homocyclic. All unstarred, mincing people are bicameral. Bathsheba is unstarred.", "logic": "\nNeuronic(spiros)\nMincing(spiros)\nColtish(trudy)\nMincing(trudy)\nUnstarred(bathsheba)\nAplitic(bathsheba)\nHomocyclic(bathsheba)\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) -> Coltish(x))\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Bicameral(x))\nAplitic(bathsheba) -> Homocyclic(bathsheba)\nAplitic(spiros) -> Homocyclic(spiros)\nNeuronic(spiros) and Bicameral(spiros) -> Homocyclic(spiros)\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and Mincing(x) -> Bicameral(x))\n\nUnstarred(bathsheba)\n\ntherefore Unstarred(bathsheba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Wenonah is exogamic. Wenonah is democratic. Everard is oldline. Everard is democratic. Hollie is serrulate. Hollie is rockbound. Hollie is copular. White people are oldline. Round people are savorless. If Hollie is rockbound then Hollie is copular. If Wenonah is rockbound then Wenonah is copular. If Wenonah is exogamic and Wenonah is savorless then Wenonah is copular. All serrulate, democratic people are savorless. Hollie is not serrulate.", "logic": "\nExogamic(wenonah)\nDemocratic(wenonah)\nOldline(everard)\nDemocratic(everard)\nSerrulate(hollie)\nRockbound(hollie)\nCopular(hollie)\nforall x (Copular(x) -> Oldline(x))\nforall x (Exogamic(x) -> Savorless(x))\nRockbound(hollie) -> Copular(hollie)\nRockbound(wenonah) -> Copular(wenonah)\nExogamic(wenonah) and Savorless(wenonah) -> Copular(wenonah)\nforall x (Serrulate(x) and Democratic(x) -> Savorless(x))\n\nnot Serrulate(hollie)\n\ntherefore Serrulate(hollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Raye is existent. Raye is faveolate. Lucio is financial. Lucio is faveolate. Cathrine is amok. Cathrine is pricy. Cathrine is sewed. White people are financial. Round people are arid. If Cathrine is pricy then Cathrine is sewed. If Raye is pricy then Raye is sewed. If Raye is existent and Raye is arid then Raye is sewed. All amok, faveolate people are arid. Cathrine is financial.", "logic": "\nExistent(raye)\nFaveolate(raye)\nFinancial(lucio)\nFaveolate(lucio)\nAmok(cathrine)\nPricy(cathrine)\nSewed(cathrine)\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Financial(x))\nforall x (Existent(x) -> Arid(x))\nPricy(cathrine) -> Sewed(cathrine)\nPricy(raye) -> Sewed(raye)\nExistent(raye) and Arid(raye) -> Sewed(raye)\nforall x (Amok(x) and Faveolate(x) -> Arid(x))\n\nFinancial(cathrine)\n\nSewed(cathrine) and forall x (Sewed(x) -> Financial(x)) -> therefore Financial(cathrine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Melli is tonguelike. Melli is errhine. Roseanna is liturgical. Roseanna is errhine. Betsey is emasculate. Betsey is pubertal. Betsey is cataleptic. White people are liturgical. Round people are shapely. If Betsey is pubertal then Betsey is cataleptic. If Melli is pubertal then Melli is cataleptic. If Melli is tonguelike and Melli is shapely then Melli is cataleptic. All emasculate, errhine people are shapely. Melli is not shapely.", "logic": "\nTonguelike(melli)\nErrhine(melli)\nLiturgical(roseanna)\nErrhine(roseanna)\nEmasculate(betsey)\nPubertal(betsey)\nCataleptic(betsey)\nforall x (Cataleptic(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Shapely(x))\nPubertal(betsey) -> Cataleptic(betsey)\nPubertal(melli) -> Cataleptic(melli)\nTonguelike(melli) and Shapely(melli) -> Cataleptic(melli)\nforall x (Emasculate(x) and Errhine(x) -> Shapely(x))\n\nnot Shapely(melli)\n\nTonguelike(melli) and forall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Shapely(x)) -> therefore Shapely(melli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Verne is jade. Verne is proven. Perceval is raptorial. Perceval is proven. Ileane is dizygous. Ileane is fahrenheit. Ileane is carpeted. White people are raptorial. Round people are prosaic. If Ileane is fahrenheit then Ileane is carpeted. If Verne is fahrenheit then Verne is carpeted. If Verne is jade and Verne is prosaic then Verne is carpeted. All dizygous, proven people are prosaic. Verne is carpeted.", "logic": "\nJade(verne)\nProven(verne)\nRaptorial(perceval)\nProven(perceval)\nDizygous(ileane)\nFahrenheit(ileane)\nCarpeted(ileane)\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Prosaic(x))\nFahrenheit(ileane) -> Carpeted(ileane)\nFahrenheit(verne) -> Carpeted(verne)\nJade(verne) and Prosaic(verne) -> Carpeted(verne)\nforall x (Dizygous(x) and Proven(x) -> Prosaic(x))\n\nCarpeted(verne)\n\nJade(verne) and forall x (Jade(x) -> Prosaic(x)) -> therefore Prosaic(verne) Jade(verne) and Prosaic(verne) and Jade(verne) and Prosaic(verne) -> Carpeted(verne) -> therefore Carpeted(verne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Pegeen is frigid. Pegeen is respondent. Felice is alexic. Felice is respondent. Vlad is mellowed. Vlad is sassy. Vlad is sugary. White people are alexic. Round people are totipotent. If Vlad is sassy then Vlad is sugary. If Pegeen is sassy then Pegeen is sugary. If Pegeen is frigid and Pegeen is totipotent then Pegeen is sugary. All mellowed, respondent people are totipotent. Pegeen is not sugary.", "logic": "\nFrigid(pegeen)\nRespondent(pegeen)\nAlexic(felice)\nRespondent(felice)\nMellowed(vlad)\nSassy(vlad)\nSugary(vlad)\nforall x (Sugary(x) -> Alexic(x))\nforall x (Frigid(x) -> Totipotent(x))\nSassy(vlad) -> Sugary(vlad)\nSassy(pegeen) -> Sugary(pegeen)\nFrigid(pegeen) and Totipotent(pegeen) -> Sugary(pegeen)\nforall x (Mellowed(x) and Respondent(x) -> Totipotent(x))\n\nnot Sugary(pegeen)\n\nFrigid(pegeen) and forall x (Frigid(x) -> Totipotent(x)) -> therefore Totipotent(pegeen) Frigid(pegeen) and Totipotent(pegeen) and Frigid(pegeen) and Totipotent(pegeen) -> Sugary(pegeen) -> therefore Sugary(pegeen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Owen is uninitiate. Owen is corrected. Hari is agonized. Hari is corrected. Agnesse is colloquial. Agnesse is mesozoic. Agnesse is aeriferous. White people are agonized. Round people are superhuman. If Agnesse is mesozoic then Agnesse is aeriferous. If Owen is mesozoic then Owen is aeriferous. If Owen is uninitiate and Owen is superhuman then Owen is aeriferous. All colloquial, corrected people are superhuman. Owen is agonized.", "logic": "\nUninitiate(owen)\nCorrected(owen)\nAgonized(hari)\nCorrected(hari)\nColloquial(agnesse)\nMesozoic(agnesse)\nAeriferous(agnesse)\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) -> Agonized(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Superhuman(x))\nMesozoic(agnesse) -> Aeriferous(agnesse)\nMesozoic(owen) -> Aeriferous(owen)\nUninitiate(owen) and Superhuman(owen) -> Aeriferous(owen)\nforall x (Colloquial(x) and Corrected(x) -> Superhuman(x))\n\nAgonized(owen)\n\nUninitiate(owen) and forall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Superhuman(x)) -> therefore Superhuman(owen) Uninitiate(owen) and Superhuman(owen) and Uninitiate(owen) and Superhuman(owen) -> Aeriferous(owen) -> therefore Aeriferous(owen) Aeriferous(owen) and forall x (Aeriferous(x) -> Agonized(x)) -> therefore Agonized(owen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Kirsti is oaken. Kirsti is idiopathic. Emogene is sarcoid. Emogene is idiopathic. Eden is laic. Eden is humiliated. Eden is aweigh. White people are sarcoid. Round people are sericeous. If Eden is humiliated then Eden is aweigh. If Kirsti is humiliated then Kirsti is aweigh. If Kirsti is oaken and Kirsti is sericeous then Kirsti is aweigh. All laic, idiopathic people are sericeous. Kirsti is not sarcoid.", "logic": "\nOaken(kirsti)\nIdiopathic(kirsti)\nSarcoid(emogene)\nIdiopathic(emogene)\nLaic(eden)\nHumiliated(eden)\nAweigh(eden)\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Sarcoid(x))\nforall x (Oaken(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nHumiliated(eden) -> Aweigh(eden)\nHumiliated(kirsti) -> Aweigh(kirsti)\nOaken(kirsti) and Sericeous(kirsti) -> Aweigh(kirsti)\nforall x (Laic(x) and Idiopathic(x) -> Sericeous(x))\n\nnot Sarcoid(kirsti)\n\nOaken(kirsti) and forall x (Oaken(x) -> Sericeous(x)) -> therefore Sericeous(kirsti) Oaken(kirsti) and Sericeous(kirsti) and Oaken(kirsti) and Sericeous(kirsti) -> Aweigh(kirsti) -> therefore Aweigh(kirsti) Aweigh(kirsti) and forall x (Aweigh(x) -> Sarcoid(x)) -> therefore Sarcoid(kirsti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Rochette is sensual. Rochette is ersatz. Nydia is footed. Nydia is ersatz. Ham is impudent. Ham is spatial. Ham is concordant. White people are footed. Round people are disgraced. If Ham is spatial then Ham is concordant. If Rochette is spatial then Rochette is concordant. If Rochette is sensual and Rochette is disgraced then Rochette is concordant. All impudent, ersatz people are disgraced. Ham is not disgraced.", "logic": "\nSensual(rochette)\nErsatz(rochette)\nFooted(nydia)\nErsatz(nydia)\nImpudent(ham)\nSpatial(ham)\nConcordant(ham)\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Footed(x))\nforall x (Sensual(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nSpatial(ham) -> Concordant(ham)\nSpatial(rochette) -> Concordant(rochette)\nSensual(rochette) and Disgraced(rochette) -> Concordant(rochette)\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Ersatz(x) -> Disgraced(x))\n\nnot Disgraced(ham)\n\nforall x (Sensual(x) -> Disgraced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Aldus is vulgar. Aldus is tritanopic. Benetta is indiscrete. Benetta is tritanopic. Amanda is calyceal. Amanda is close. Amanda is lobed. White people are indiscrete. Round people are perpetual. If Amanda is close then Amanda is lobed. If Aldus is close then Aldus is lobed. If Aldus is vulgar and Aldus is perpetual then Aldus is lobed. All calyceal, tritanopic people are perpetual. Benetta is perpetual.", "logic": "\nVulgar(aldus)\nTritanopic(aldus)\nIndiscrete(benetta)\nTritanopic(benetta)\nCalyceal(amanda)\nClose(amanda)\nLobed(amanda)\nforall x (Lobed(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Perpetual(x))\nClose(amanda) -> Lobed(amanda)\nClose(aldus) -> Lobed(aldus)\nVulgar(aldus) and Perpetual(aldus) -> Lobed(aldus)\nforall x (Calyceal(x) and Tritanopic(x) -> Perpetual(x))\n\nPerpetual(benetta)\n\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Perpetual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Tiertza is bittie. Tiertza is glassless. Chase is acinous. Chase is glassless. Sheri is elapsed. Sheri is buttoned. Sheri is dotted. White people are acinous. Round people are speechless. If Sheri is buttoned then Sheri is dotted. If Tiertza is buttoned then Tiertza is dotted. If Tiertza is bittie and Tiertza is speechless then Tiertza is dotted. All elapsed, glassless people are speechless. Chase is not elapsed.", "logic": "\nBittie(tiertza)\nGlassless(tiertza)\nAcinous(chase)\nGlassless(chase)\nElapsed(sheri)\nButtoned(sheri)\nDotted(sheri)\nforall x (Dotted(x) -> Acinous(x))\nforall x (Bittie(x) -> Speechless(x))\nButtoned(sheri) -> Dotted(sheri)\nButtoned(tiertza) -> Dotted(tiertza)\nBittie(tiertza) and Speechless(tiertza) -> Dotted(tiertza)\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Glassless(x) -> Speechless(x))\n\nnot Elapsed(chase)\n\nnot Elapsed(chase) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Trixi is unrested. Trixi is umbellate. Shanna is petalous. Shanna is umbellate. Tatiana is unimagined. Tatiana is setose. Tatiana is clenched. White people are petalous. Round people are experient. If Tatiana is setose then Tatiana is clenched. If Trixi is setose then Trixi is clenched. If Trixi is unrested and Trixi is experient then Trixi is clenched. All unimagined, umbellate people are experient. Tatiana is unrested.", "logic": "\nUnrested(trixi)\nUmbellate(trixi)\nPetalous(shanna)\nUmbellate(shanna)\nUnimagined(tatiana)\nSetose(tatiana)\nClenched(tatiana)\nforall x (Clenched(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Unrested(x) -> Experient(x))\nSetose(tatiana) -> Clenched(tatiana)\nSetose(trixi) -> Clenched(trixi)\nUnrested(trixi) and Experient(trixi) -> Clenched(trixi)\nforall x (Unimagined(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Experient(x))\n\nUnrested(tatiana)\n\nUnrested(tatiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Matilde is enraged. Matilde is tolerant. Lorne is touristy. Lorne is tolerant. Bryna is union. Bryna is unforceful. Bryna is hircine. White people are touristy. Round people are perinatal. If Bryna is unforceful then Bryna is hircine. If Matilde is unforceful then Matilde is hircine. If Matilde is enraged and Matilde is perinatal then Matilde is hircine. All union, tolerant people are perinatal. Lorne is not enraged.", "logic": "\nEnraged(matilde)\nTolerant(matilde)\nTouristy(lorne)\nTolerant(lorne)\nUnion(bryna)\nUnforceful(bryna)\nHircine(bryna)\nforall x (Hircine(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Enraged(x) -> Perinatal(x))\nUnforceful(bryna) -> Hircine(bryna)\nUnforceful(matilde) -> Hircine(matilde)\nEnraged(matilde) and Perinatal(matilde) -> Hircine(matilde)\nforall x (Union(x) and Tolerant(x) -> Perinatal(x))\n\nnot Enraged(lorne)\n\nnot Enraged(lorne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Ludwig is numerable. Ludwig is exiguous. Brynne is pointless. Brynne is exiguous. Kincaid is trifling. Kincaid is some. Kincaid is maoist. White people are pointless. Round people are profuse. If Kincaid is some then Kincaid is maoist. If Ludwig is some then Ludwig is maoist. If Ludwig is numerable and Ludwig is profuse then Ludwig is maoist. All trifling, exiguous people are profuse. Ludwig is trifling.", "logic": "\nNumerable(ludwig)\nExiguous(ludwig)\nPointless(brynne)\nExiguous(brynne)\nTrifling(kincaid)\nSome(kincaid)\nMaoist(kincaid)\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> Pointless(x))\nforall x (Numerable(x) -> Profuse(x))\nSome(kincaid) -> Maoist(kincaid)\nSome(ludwig) -> Maoist(ludwig)\nNumerable(ludwig) and Profuse(ludwig) -> Maoist(ludwig)\nforall x (Trifling(x) and Exiguous(x) -> Profuse(x))\n\nTrifling(ludwig)\n\nTrifling(ludwig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Nahum is exothermic. Nahum is inanimate. Udale is rectal. Udale is inanimate. Archibald is oversize. Archibald is cassocked. Archibald is listless. White people are rectal. Round people are slopped. If Archibald is cassocked then Archibald is listless. If Nahum is cassocked then Nahum is listless. If Nahum is exothermic and Nahum is slopped then Nahum is listless. All oversize, inanimate people are slopped. Nahum is not cassocked.", "logic": "\nExothermic(nahum)\nInanimate(nahum)\nRectal(udale)\nInanimate(udale)\nOversize(archibald)\nCassocked(archibald)\nListless(archibald)\nforall x (Listless(x) -> Rectal(x))\nforall x (Exothermic(x) -> Slopped(x))\nCassocked(archibald) -> Listless(archibald)\nCassocked(nahum) -> Listless(nahum)\nExothermic(nahum) and Slopped(nahum) -> Listless(nahum)\nforall x (Oversize(x) and Inanimate(x) -> Slopped(x))\n\nnot Cassocked(nahum)\n\nnot Cassocked(nahum) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Daniela is noncaloric. Daniela is nonechoic. Mimi is amazing. Mimi is nonechoic. Frayda is abasic. Frayda is squamulose. Frayda is dreamless. White people are amazing. Round people are carinated. If Frayda is squamulose then Frayda is dreamless. If Daniela is squamulose then Daniela is dreamless. If Daniela is noncaloric and Daniela is carinated then Daniela is dreamless. All abasic, nonechoic people are carinated. Mimi is squamulose.", "logic": "\nNoncaloric(daniela)\nNonechoic(daniela)\nAmazing(mimi)\nNonechoic(mimi)\nAbasic(frayda)\nSquamulose(frayda)\nDreamless(frayda)\nforall x (Dreamless(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Carinated(x))\nSquamulose(frayda) -> Dreamless(frayda)\nSquamulose(daniela) -> Dreamless(daniela)\nNoncaloric(daniela) and Carinated(daniela) -> Dreamless(daniela)\nforall x (Abasic(x) and Nonechoic(x) -> Carinated(x))\n\nSquamulose(mimi)\n\nSquamulose(mimi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "The hyacinthe diagnose the dorette. The dorette diagnose the hyacinthe. The jacquelyn revive the dorette. If the dorette revive the hyacinthe then the hyacinthe revive the dorette. If someone capsulize the hyacinthe and the hyacinthe is blastular then they are blindfold. If someone is blindfold then they chase the hyacinthe. If someone capsulize the dorette then the dorette is blindfold. If the hyacinthe diagnose the dorette then the hyacinthe capsulize the dorette. If someone capsulize the dorette and they need the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn diagnose the dorette. The jacquelyn revive the dorette.", "logic": "\nDiagnose(hyacinthe, dorette)\nDiagnose(dorette, hyacinthe)\nRevive(jacquelyn, dorette)\nRevive(dorette, hyacinthe) -> Revive(hyacinthe, dorette)\nforall x (Capsulize(x, hyacinthe) and Blastular(hyacinthe) -> Blindfold(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) -> Capsulize(x, hyacinthe))\nforall x (Capsulize(x, dorette) -> Blindfold(dorette))\nDiagnose(hyacinthe, dorette) -> Capsulize(hyacinthe, dorette)\nforall x (Capsulize(x, dorette) and Revive(x, jacquelyn) -> Diagnose(jacquelyn, dorette))\n\nRevive(jacquelyn, dorette)\n\ntherefore Revive(jacquelyn, dorette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The merrel unstring the shep. The shep unstring the merrel. The nils hang the shep. If the shep hang the merrel then the merrel hang the shep. If someone trammel the merrel and the merrel is vocative then they are natural. If someone is natural then they chase the merrel. If someone trammel the shep then the shep is natural. If the merrel unstring the shep then the merrel trammel the shep. If someone trammel the shep and they need the nils then the nils unstring the shep. The shep does not see the merrel.", "logic": "\nUnstring(merrel, shep)\nUnstring(shep, merrel)\nHang(nils, shep)\nHang(shep, merrel) -> Hang(merrel, shep)\nforall x (Trammel(x, merrel) and Vocative(merrel) -> Natural(x))\nforall x (Natural(x) -> Trammel(x, merrel))\nforall x (Trammel(x, shep) -> Natural(shep))\nUnstring(merrel, shep) -> Trammel(merrel, shep)\nforall x (Trammel(x, shep) and Hang(x, nils) -> Unstring(nils, shep))\n\nnot Unstring(shep, merrel)\n\ntherefore Unstring(shep, merrel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The clemmy preform the ilsa. The ilsa preform the clemmy. The brittney distract the ilsa. If the ilsa distract the clemmy then the clemmy distract the ilsa. If someone swash the clemmy and the clemmy is threefold then they are draining. If someone is draining then they chase the clemmy. If someone swash the ilsa then the ilsa is draining. If the clemmy preform the ilsa then the clemmy swash the ilsa. If someone swash the ilsa and they need the brittney then the brittney preform the ilsa. The clemmy swash the ilsa.", "logic": "\nPreform(clemmy, ilsa)\nPreform(ilsa, clemmy)\nDistract(brittney, ilsa)\nDistract(ilsa, clemmy) -> Distract(clemmy, ilsa)\nforall x (Swash(x, clemmy) and Threefold(clemmy) -> Draining(x))\nforall x (Draining(x) -> Swash(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Swash(x, ilsa) -> Draining(ilsa))\nPreform(clemmy, ilsa) -> Swash(clemmy, ilsa)\nforall x (Swash(x, ilsa) and Distract(x, brittney) -> Preform(brittney, ilsa))\n\nSwash(clemmy, ilsa)\n\nPreform(clemmy, ilsa) and Preform(clemmy, ilsa) -> Swash(clemmy, ilsa) -> therefore Swash(clemmy, ilsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The bronson avalanche the aline. The aline avalanche the bronson. The sarena dull the aline. If the aline dull the bronson then the bronson dull the aline. If someone revolt the bronson and the bronson is groggy then they are stygian. If someone is stygian then they chase the bronson. If someone revolt the aline then the aline is stygian. If the bronson avalanche the aline then the bronson revolt the aline. If someone revolt the aline and they need the sarena then the sarena avalanche the aline. The bronson does not chase the aline.", "logic": "\nAvalanche(bronson, aline)\nAvalanche(aline, bronson)\nDull(sarena, aline)\nDull(aline, bronson) -> Dull(bronson, aline)\nforall x (Revolt(x, bronson) and Groggy(bronson) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Stygian(x) -> Revolt(x, bronson))\nforall x (Revolt(x, aline) -> Stygian(aline))\nAvalanche(bronson, aline) -> Revolt(bronson, aline)\nforall x (Revolt(x, aline) and Dull(x, sarena) -> Avalanche(sarena, aline))\n\nnot Revolt(bronson, aline)\n\nAvalanche(bronson, aline) and Avalanche(bronson, aline) -> Revolt(bronson, aline) -> therefore Revolt(bronson, aline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The benedetta reassemble the chuck. The chuck reassemble the benedetta. The rutger improvize the chuck. If the chuck improvize the benedetta then the benedetta improvize the chuck. If someone cadge the benedetta and the benedetta is japanese then they are palladian. If someone is palladian then they chase the benedetta. If someone cadge the chuck then the chuck is palladian. If the benedetta reassemble the chuck then the benedetta cadge the chuck. If someone cadge the chuck and they need the rutger then the rutger reassemble the chuck. The chuck is palladian.", "logic": "\nReassemble(benedetta, chuck)\nReassemble(chuck, benedetta)\nImprovize(rutger, chuck)\nImprovize(chuck, benedetta) -> Improvize(benedetta, chuck)\nforall x (Cadge(x, benedetta) and Japanese(benedetta) -> Palladian(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Cadge(x, benedetta))\nforall x (Cadge(x, chuck) -> Palladian(chuck))\nReassemble(benedetta, chuck) -> Cadge(benedetta, chuck)\nforall x (Cadge(x, chuck) and Improvize(x, rutger) -> Reassemble(rutger, chuck))\n\nPalladian(chuck)\n\nReassemble(benedetta, chuck) and Reassemble(benedetta, chuck) -> Cadge(benedetta, chuck) -> therefore Cadge(benedetta, chuck) Cadge(benedetta, chuck) and forall x (Cadge(x, chuck) -> Palladian(chuck)) -> therefore Palladian(chuck)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The gabbi shame the rayshell. The rayshell shame the gabbi. The violette junket the rayshell. If the rayshell junket the gabbi then the gabbi junket the rayshell. If someone sadden the gabbi and the gabbi is illiberal then they are apraxic. If someone is apraxic then they chase the gabbi. If someone sadden the rayshell then the rayshell is apraxic. If the gabbi shame the rayshell then the gabbi sadden the rayshell. If someone sadden the rayshell and they need the violette then the violette shame the rayshell. The rayshell is not apraxic.", "logic": "\nShame(gabbi, rayshell)\nShame(rayshell, gabbi)\nJunket(violette, rayshell)\nJunket(rayshell, gabbi) -> Junket(gabbi, rayshell)\nforall x (Sadden(x, gabbi) and Illiberal(gabbi) -> Apraxic(x))\nforall x (Apraxic(x) -> Sadden(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Sadden(x, rayshell) -> Apraxic(rayshell))\nShame(gabbi, rayshell) -> Sadden(gabbi, rayshell)\nforall x (Sadden(x, rayshell) and Junket(x, violette) -> Shame(violette, rayshell))\n\nnot Apraxic(rayshell)\n\nShame(gabbi, rayshell) and Shame(gabbi, rayshell) -> Sadden(gabbi, rayshell) -> therefore Sadden(gabbi, rayshell) Sadden(gabbi, rayshell) and forall x (Sadden(x, rayshell) -> Apraxic(rayshell)) -> therefore Apraxic(rayshell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The ulick metalize the kristyn. The kristyn metalize the ulick. The inglebert rethink the kristyn. If the kristyn rethink the ulick then the ulick rethink the kristyn. If someone shroud the ulick and the ulick is pussy then they are estuarial. If someone is estuarial then they chase the ulick. If someone shroud the kristyn then the kristyn is estuarial. If the ulick metalize the kristyn then the ulick shroud the kristyn. If someone shroud the kristyn and they need the inglebert then the inglebert metalize the kristyn. The kristyn shroud the ulick.", "logic": "\nMetalize(ulick, kristyn)\nMetalize(kristyn, ulick)\nRethink(inglebert, kristyn)\nRethink(kristyn, ulick) -> Rethink(ulick, kristyn)\nforall x (Shroud(x, ulick) and Pussy(ulick) -> Estuarial(x))\nforall x (Estuarial(x) -> Shroud(x, ulick))\nforall x (Shroud(x, kristyn) -> Estuarial(kristyn))\nMetalize(ulick, kristyn) -> Shroud(ulick, kristyn)\nforall x (Shroud(x, kristyn) and Rethink(x, inglebert) -> Metalize(inglebert, kristyn))\n\nShroud(kristyn, ulick)\n\nMetalize(ulick, kristyn) and Metalize(ulick, kristyn) -> Shroud(ulick, kristyn) -> therefore Shroud(ulick, kristyn) Shroud(ulick, kristyn) and forall x (Shroud(x, kristyn) -> Estuarial(kristyn)) -> therefore Estuarial(kristyn) Estuarial(kristyn) and forall x (Estuarial(x) -> Shroud(x, ulick)) -> therefore Shroud(kristyn, ulick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The rivi perturb the brewer. The brewer perturb the rivi. The myrilla heel the brewer. If the brewer heel the rivi then the rivi heel the brewer. If someone soar the rivi and the rivi is nocent then they are undimmed. If someone is undimmed then they chase the rivi. If someone soar the brewer then the brewer is undimmed. If the rivi perturb the brewer then the rivi soar the brewer. If someone soar the brewer and they need the myrilla then the myrilla perturb the brewer. The brewer does not chase the rivi.", "logic": "\nPerturb(rivi, brewer)\nPerturb(brewer, rivi)\nHeel(myrilla, brewer)\nHeel(brewer, rivi) -> Heel(rivi, brewer)\nforall x (Soar(x, rivi) and Nocent(rivi) -> Undimmed(x))\nforall x (Undimmed(x) -> Soar(x, rivi))\nforall x (Soar(x, brewer) -> Undimmed(brewer))\nPerturb(rivi, brewer) -> Soar(rivi, brewer)\nforall x (Soar(x, brewer) and Heel(x, myrilla) -> Perturb(myrilla, brewer))\n\nnot Soar(brewer, rivi)\n\nPerturb(rivi, brewer) and Perturb(rivi, brewer) -> Soar(rivi, brewer) -> therefore Soar(rivi, brewer) Soar(rivi, brewer) and forall x (Soar(x, brewer) -> Undimmed(brewer)) -> therefore Undimmed(brewer) Undimmed(brewer) and forall x (Undimmed(x) -> Soar(x, rivi)) -> therefore Soar(brewer, rivi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The bart bewilder the marlowe. The marlowe bewilder the bart. The yvonne trifurcate the marlowe. If the marlowe trifurcate the bart then the bart trifurcate the marlowe. If someone crossruff the bart and the bart is humpbacked then they are resolved. If someone is resolved then they chase the bart. If someone crossruff the marlowe then the marlowe is resolved. If the bart bewilder the marlowe then the bart crossruff the marlowe. If someone crossruff the marlowe and they need the yvonne then the yvonne bewilder the marlowe. The yvonne does not chase the bart.", "logic": "\nBewilder(bart, marlowe)\nBewilder(marlowe, bart)\nTrifurcate(yvonne, marlowe)\nTrifurcate(marlowe, bart) -> Trifurcate(bart, marlowe)\nforall x (Crossruff(x, bart) and Humpbacked(bart) -> Resolved(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Crossruff(x, bart))\nforall x (Crossruff(x, marlowe) -> Resolved(marlowe))\nBewilder(bart, marlowe) -> Crossruff(bart, marlowe)\nforall x (Crossruff(x, marlowe) and Trifurcate(x, yvonne) -> Bewilder(yvonne, marlowe))\n\nnot Crossruff(yvonne, bart)\n\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Crossruff(x, bart)) <- forall x (Crossruff(x, bart) and Humpbacked(bart) -> Resolved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The thomasina pollenate the cordelie. The cordelie pollenate the thomasina. The bryana heed the cordelie. If the cordelie heed the thomasina then the thomasina heed the cordelie. If someone give the thomasina and the thomasina is extricable then they are bigger. If someone is bigger then they chase the thomasina. If someone give the cordelie then the cordelie is bigger. If the thomasina pollenate the cordelie then the thomasina give the cordelie. If someone give the cordelie and they need the bryana then the bryana pollenate the cordelie. The thomasina heed the cordelie.", "logic": "\nPollenate(thomasina, cordelie)\nPollenate(cordelie, thomasina)\nHeed(bryana, cordelie)\nHeed(cordelie, thomasina) -> Heed(thomasina, cordelie)\nforall x (Give(x, thomasina) and Extricable(thomasina) -> Bigger(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Give(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Give(x, cordelie) -> Bigger(cordelie))\nPollenate(thomasina, cordelie) -> Give(thomasina, cordelie)\nforall x (Give(x, cordelie) and Heed(x, bryana) -> Pollenate(bryana, cordelie))\n\nHeed(thomasina, cordelie)\n\nHeed(cordelie, thomasina) -> Heed(thomasina, cordelie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The iago rejoice the marysa. The marysa rejoice the iago. The norean secularize the marysa. If the marysa secularize the iago then the iago secularize the marysa. If someone bouse the iago and the iago is mingy then they are tenth. If someone is tenth then they chase the iago. If someone bouse the marysa then the marysa is tenth. If the iago rejoice the marysa then the iago bouse the marysa. If someone bouse the marysa and they need the norean then the norean rejoice the marysa. The iago does not chase the iago.", "logic": "\nRejoice(iago, marysa)\nRejoice(marysa, iago)\nSecularize(norean, marysa)\nSecularize(marysa, iago) -> Secularize(iago, marysa)\nforall x (Bouse(x, iago) and Mingy(iago) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Bouse(x, iago))\nforall x (Bouse(x, marysa) -> Tenth(marysa))\nRejoice(iago, marysa) -> Bouse(iago, marysa)\nforall x (Bouse(x, marysa) and Secularize(x, norean) -> Rejoice(norean, marysa))\n\nnot Bouse(iago, iago)\n\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Bouse(x, iago)) <- forall x (Bouse(x, iago) and Mingy(iago) -> Tenth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The bernadine misspeak the vivie. The vivie misspeak the bernadine. The sada cramp the vivie. If the vivie cramp the bernadine then the bernadine cramp the vivie. If someone unpin the bernadine and the bernadine is razed then they are grassy. If someone is grassy then they chase the bernadine. If someone unpin the vivie then the vivie is grassy. If the bernadine misspeak the vivie then the bernadine unpin the vivie. If someone unpin the vivie and they need the sada then the sada misspeak the vivie. The bernadine is grassy.", "logic": "\nMisspeak(bernadine, vivie)\nMisspeak(vivie, bernadine)\nCramp(sada, vivie)\nCramp(vivie, bernadine) -> Cramp(bernadine, vivie)\nforall x (Unpin(x, bernadine) and Razed(bernadine) -> Grassy(x))\nforall x (Grassy(x) -> Unpin(x, bernadine))\nforall x (Unpin(x, vivie) -> Grassy(vivie))\nMisspeak(bernadine, vivie) -> Unpin(bernadine, vivie)\nforall x (Unpin(x, vivie) and Cramp(x, sada) -> Misspeak(sada, vivie))\n\nGrassy(bernadine)\n\nforall x (Unpin(x, bernadine) and Razed(bernadine) -> Grassy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The catlaina scotch the rosalia. The rosalia scotch the catlaina. The ronni intonate the rosalia. If the rosalia intonate the catlaina then the catlaina intonate the rosalia. If someone levy the catlaina and the catlaina is crustlike then they are kindled. If someone is kindled then they chase the catlaina. If someone levy the rosalia then the rosalia is kindled. If the catlaina scotch the rosalia then the catlaina levy the rosalia. If someone levy the rosalia and they need the ronni then the ronni scotch the rosalia. The rosalia is not round.", "logic": "\nScotch(catlaina, rosalia)\nScotch(rosalia, catlaina)\nIntonate(ronni, rosalia)\nIntonate(rosalia, catlaina) -> Intonate(catlaina, rosalia)\nforall x (Levy(x, catlaina) and Crustlike(catlaina) -> Kindled(x))\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Levy(x, catlaina))\nforall x (Levy(x, rosalia) -> Kindled(rosalia))\nScotch(catlaina, rosalia) -> Levy(catlaina, rosalia)\nforall x (Levy(x, rosalia) and Intonate(x, ronni) -> Scotch(ronni, rosalia))\n\nnot Round(rosalia)\n\nnot Round(rosalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The shaw abstain the stacia. The stacia abstain the shaw. The gustaf homer the stacia. If the stacia homer the shaw then the shaw homer the stacia. If someone smile the shaw and the shaw is brash then they are discharged. If someone is discharged then they chase the shaw. If someone smile the stacia then the stacia is discharged. If the shaw abstain the stacia then the shaw smile the stacia. If someone smile the stacia and they need the gustaf then the gustaf abstain the stacia. The stacia homer the stacia.", "logic": "\nAbstain(shaw, stacia)\nAbstain(stacia, shaw)\nHomer(gustaf, stacia)\nHomer(stacia, shaw) -> Homer(shaw, stacia)\nforall x (Smile(x, shaw) and Brash(shaw) -> Discharged(x))\nforall x (Discharged(x) -> Smile(x, shaw))\nforall x (Smile(x, stacia) -> Discharged(stacia))\nAbstain(shaw, stacia) -> Smile(shaw, stacia)\nforall x (Smile(x, stacia) and Homer(x, gustaf) -> Abstain(gustaf, stacia))\n\nHomer(stacia, stacia)\n\nHomer(stacia, stacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The maure picnic the freda. The freda picnic the maure. The pembroke filter the freda. If the freda filter the maure then the maure filter the freda. If someone slaughter the maure and the maure is sweptwing then they are executive. If someone is executive then they chase the maure. If someone slaughter the freda then the freda is executive. If the maure picnic the freda then the maure slaughter the freda. If someone slaughter the freda and they need the pembroke then the pembroke picnic the freda. The freda does not see the pembroke.", "logic": "\nPicnic(maure, freda)\nPicnic(freda, maure)\nFilter(pembroke, freda)\nFilter(freda, maure) -> Filter(maure, freda)\nforall x (Slaughter(x, maure) and Sweptwing(maure) -> Executive(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) -> Slaughter(x, maure))\nforall x (Slaughter(x, freda) -> Executive(freda))\nPicnic(maure, freda) -> Slaughter(maure, freda)\nforall x (Slaughter(x, freda) and Filter(x, pembroke) -> Picnic(pembroke, freda))\n\nnot Picnic(freda, pembroke)\n\nnot Picnic(freda, pembroke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The josephina organize the marj. The marj organize the josephina. The onida skin the marj. If the marj skin the josephina then the josephina skin the marj. If someone tailor the josephina and the josephina is delusive then they are allergic. If someone is allergic then they chase the josephina. If someone tailor the marj then the marj is allergic. If the josephina organize the marj then the josephina tailor the marj. If someone tailor the marj and they need the onida then the onida organize the marj. The josephina organize the onida.", "logic": "\nOrganize(josephina, marj)\nOrganize(marj, josephina)\nSkin(onida, marj)\nSkin(marj, josephina) -> Skin(josephina, marj)\nforall x (Tailor(x, josephina) and Delusive(josephina) -> Allergic(x))\nforall x (Allergic(x) -> Tailor(x, josephina))\nforall x (Tailor(x, marj) -> Allergic(marj))\nOrganize(josephina, marj) -> Tailor(josephina, marj)\nforall x (Tailor(x, marj) and Skin(x, onida) -> Organize(onida, marj))\n\nOrganize(josephina, onida)\n\nOrganize(josephina, onida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "Betteann is barehanded. Verine is held. Verine is ownerless. If Betteann is sarcastic and Betteann is held then Betteann is briton. Rough things are barehanded. All ownerless things are briton. Big things are sarcastic. All barehanded things are held. All briton, sarcastic things are ownerless. Verine is ownerless.", "logic": "\nBarehanded(betteann)\nHeld(verine)\nOwnerless(verine)\nSarcastic(betteann) and Held(betteann) -> Briton(betteann)\nforall x (Askance(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Briton(x))\nforall x (Held(x) -> Sarcastic(x))\nforall x (Barehanded(x) -> Held(x))\nforall x (Briton(x) and Sarcastic(x) -> Ownerless(x))\n\nOwnerless(verine)\n\ntherefore Ownerless(verine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Petrina is septic. Wilson is fistulous. Wilson is completing. If Petrina is stuffed and Petrina is fistulous then Petrina is unchaste. Rough things are septic. All completing things are unchaste. Big things are stuffed. All septic things are fistulous. All unchaste, stuffed things are completing. Wilson is not fistulous.", "logic": "\nSeptic(petrina)\nFistulous(wilson)\nCompleting(wilson)\nStuffed(petrina) and Fistulous(petrina) -> Unchaste(petrina)\nforall x (Scented(x) -> Septic(x))\nforall x (Completing(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) -> Stuffed(x))\nforall x (Septic(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Stuffed(x) -> Completing(x))\n\nnot Fistulous(wilson)\n\ntherefore Fistulous(wilson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Judah is seditious. Town is eery. Town is bigeneric. If Judah is apraxic and Judah is eery then Judah is exploded. Rough things are seditious. All bigeneric things are exploded. Big things are apraxic. All seditious things are eery. All exploded, apraxic things are bigeneric. Town is exploded.", "logic": "\nSeditious(judah)\nEery(town)\nBigeneric(town)\nApraxic(judah) and Eery(judah) -> Exploded(judah)\nforall x (Unhurt(x) -> Seditious(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Eery(x) -> Apraxic(x))\nforall x (Seditious(x) -> Eery(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) and Apraxic(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\n\nExploded(town)\n\nBigeneric(town) and forall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Exploded(x)) -> therefore Exploded(town)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Veronike is myotic. Jenilee is academic. Jenilee is bivalent. If Veronike is unpunished and Veronike is academic then Veronike is loopy. Rough things are myotic. All bivalent things are loopy. Big things are unpunished. All myotic things are academic. All loopy, unpunished things are bivalent. Veronike is not academic.", "logic": "\nMyotic(veronike)\nAcademic(jenilee)\nBivalent(jenilee)\nUnpunished(veronike) and Academic(veronike) -> Loopy(veronike)\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Myotic(x))\nforall x (Bivalent(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Academic(x) -> Unpunished(x))\nforall x (Myotic(x) -> Academic(x))\nforall x (Loopy(x) and Unpunished(x) -> Bivalent(x))\n\nnot Academic(veronike)\n\nMyotic(veronike) and forall x (Myotic(x) -> Academic(x)) -> therefore Academic(veronike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Caryn is walking. Slim is glorified. Slim is numerate. If Caryn is vaccinated and Caryn is glorified then Caryn is rare. Rough things are walking. All numerate things are rare. Big things are vaccinated. All walking things are glorified. All rare, vaccinated things are numerate. Caryn is vaccinated.", "logic": "\nWalking(caryn)\nGlorified(slim)\nNumerate(slim)\nVaccinated(caryn) and Glorified(caryn) -> Rare(caryn)\nforall x (Unuttered(x) -> Walking(x))\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> Rare(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Walking(x) -> Glorified(x))\nforall x (Rare(x) and Vaccinated(x) -> Numerate(x))\n\nVaccinated(caryn)\n\nWalking(caryn) and forall x (Walking(x) -> Glorified(x)) -> therefore Glorified(caryn) Glorified(caryn) and forall x (Glorified(x) -> Vaccinated(x)) -> therefore Vaccinated(caryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Mitra is monophonic. Fonsie is leaved. Fonsie is subacid. If Mitra is hundredth and Mitra is leaved then Mitra is subtle. Rough things are monophonic. All subacid things are subtle. Big things are hundredth. All monophonic things are leaved. All subtle, hundredth things are subacid. Mitra is not hundredth.", "logic": "\nMonophonic(mitra)\nLeaved(fonsie)\nSubacid(fonsie)\nHundredth(mitra) and Leaved(mitra) -> Subtle(mitra)\nforall x (Climactic(x) -> Monophonic(x))\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> Subtle(x))\nforall x (Leaved(x) -> Hundredth(x))\nforall x (Monophonic(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Subtle(x) and Hundredth(x) -> Subacid(x))\n\nnot Hundredth(mitra)\n\nMonophonic(mitra) and forall x (Monophonic(x) -> Leaved(x)) -> therefore Leaved(mitra) Leaved(mitra) and forall x (Leaved(x) -> Hundredth(x)) -> therefore Hundredth(mitra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Wes is disturbing. Gerta is oceangoing. Gerta is elaborated. If Wes is semite and Wes is oceangoing then Wes is ruffianly. Rough things are disturbing. All elaborated things are ruffianly. Big things are semite. All disturbing things are oceangoing. All ruffianly, semite things are elaborated. Wes is ruffianly.", "logic": "\nDisturbing(wes)\nOceangoing(gerta)\nElaborated(gerta)\nSemite(wes) and Oceangoing(wes) -> Ruffianly(wes)\nforall x (Hormonal(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Ruffianly(x))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Disturbing(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) and Semite(x) -> Elaborated(x))\n\nRuffianly(wes)\n\nDisturbing(wes) and forall x (Disturbing(x) -> Oceangoing(x)) -> therefore Oceangoing(wes) Oceangoing(wes) and forall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Semite(x)) -> therefore Semite(wes) Disturbing(wes) and forall x (Disturbing(x) -> Oceangoing(x)) -> therefore Oceangoing(wes) Semite(wes) and Oceangoing(wes) and Semite(wes) and Oceangoing(wes) -> Ruffianly(wes) -> therefore Ruffianly(wes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Denys is capable. Dasi is triune. Dasi is perfervid. If Denys is quondam and Denys is triune then Denys is knackered. Rough things are capable. All perfervid things are knackered. Big things are quondam. All capable things are triune. All knackered, quondam things are perfervid. Denys is not knackered.", "logic": "\nCapable(denys)\nTriune(dasi)\nPerfervid(dasi)\nQuondam(denys) and Triune(denys) -> Knackered(denys)\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Perfervid(x) -> Knackered(x))\nforall x (Triune(x) -> Quondam(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Triune(x))\nforall x (Knackered(x) and Quondam(x) -> Perfervid(x))\n\nnot Knackered(denys)\n\nCapable(denys) and forall x (Capable(x) -> Triune(x)) -> therefore Triune(denys) Triune(denys) and forall x (Triune(x) -> Quondam(x)) -> therefore Quondam(denys) Capable(denys) and forall x (Capable(x) -> Triune(x)) -> therefore Triune(denys) Quondam(denys) and Triune(denys) and Quondam(denys) and Triune(denys) -> Knackered(denys) -> therefore Knackered(denys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Lefty is facetious. Canada is secretive. Canada is graded. If Lefty is close and Lefty is secretive then Lefty is delible. Rough things are facetious. All graded things are delible. Big things are close. All facetious things are secretive. All delible, close things are graded. Canada is not facetious.", "logic": "\nFacetious(lefty)\nSecretive(canada)\nGraded(canada)\nClose(lefty) and Secretive(lefty) -> Delible(lefty)\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Facetious(x))\nforall x (Graded(x) -> Delible(x))\nforall x (Secretive(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Facetious(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Delible(x) and Close(x) -> Graded(x))\n\nnot Facetious(canada)\n\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Facetious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Celene is myotic. Thaine is tonguelike. Thaine is titular. If Celene is diverting and Celene is tonguelike then Celene is ferny. Rough things are myotic. All titular things are ferny. Big things are diverting. All myotic things are tonguelike. All ferny, diverting things are titular. Celene is monoatomic.", "logic": "\nMyotic(celene)\nTonguelike(thaine)\nTitular(thaine)\nDiverting(celene) and Tonguelike(celene) -> Ferny(celene)\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Myotic(x))\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Ferny(x))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Diverting(x))\nforall x (Myotic(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Ferny(x) and Diverting(x) -> Titular(x))\n\nMonoatomic(celene)\n\nMonoatomic(celene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Barbee is integral. Perceval is restful. Perceval is unsmoothed. If Barbee is select and Barbee is restful then Barbee is creative. Rough things are integral. All unsmoothed things are creative. Big things are select. All integral things are restful. All creative, select things are unsmoothed. Perceval is not sharing.", "logic": "\nIntegral(barbee)\nRestful(perceval)\nUnsmoothed(perceval)\nSelect(barbee) and Restful(barbee) -> Creative(barbee)\nforall x (Sharing(x) -> Integral(x))\nforall x (Unsmoothed(x) -> Creative(x))\nforall x (Restful(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Integral(x) -> Restful(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) and Select(x) -> Unsmoothed(x))\n\nnot Sharing(perceval)\n\nnot Sharing(perceval) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Meggie is joyless. Savina is canned. Savina is bathyal. If Meggie is peninsular and Meggie is canned then Meggie is skinless. Rough things are joyless. All bathyal things are skinless. Big things are peninsular. All joyless things are canned. All skinless, peninsular things are bathyal. Savina is blue.", "logic": "\nJoyless(meggie)\nCanned(savina)\nBathyal(savina)\nPeninsular(meggie) and Canned(meggie) -> Skinless(meggie)\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) -> Joyless(x))\nforall x (Bathyal(x) -> Skinless(x))\nforall x (Canned(x) -> Peninsular(x))\nforall x (Joyless(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Skinless(x) and Peninsular(x) -> Bathyal(x))\n\nBlue(savina)\n\nBlue(savina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Tabb is bedrid. Aram is floored. Blondell is not lucid. Quiet people are yokelish. If Blondell is not bedrid and Blondell is not digestive then Blondell is yokelish. If Aram is bedrid and Aram is not stenotic then Aram is lucid. If Tabb is yokelish then Tabb is lucid. All bedrid people are floored. If Aram is digestive and Aram is not lucid then Aram is yokelish. Aram is floored.", "logic": "\nBedrid(tabb)\nFloored(aram)\nnot Lucid(blondell)\nforall x (Floored(x) -> Yokelish(x))\nnot Bedrid(blondell) and not Digestive(blondell) -> Yokelish(blondell)\nBedrid(aram) and not Stenotic(aram) -> Lucid(aram)\nYokelish(tabb) -> Lucid(tabb)\nforall x (Bedrid(x) -> Floored(x))\nDigestive(aram) and not Lucid(aram) -> Yokelish(aram)\n\nFloored(aram)\n\ntherefore Floored(aram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Alethea is untwisted. Elaine is undimmed. Prentice is not categorial. Quiet people are dotty. If Prentice is not untwisted and Prentice is not oppositive then Prentice is dotty. If Elaine is untwisted and Elaine is not vacuolated then Elaine is categorial. If Alethea is dotty then Alethea is categorial. All untwisted people are undimmed. If Elaine is oppositive and Elaine is not categorial then Elaine is dotty. Elaine is not undimmed.", "logic": "\nUntwisted(alethea)\nUndimmed(elaine)\nnot Categorial(prentice)\nforall x (Undimmed(x) -> Dotty(x))\nnot Untwisted(prentice) and not Oppositive(prentice) -> Dotty(prentice)\nUntwisted(elaine) and not Vacuolated(elaine) -> Categorial(elaine)\nDotty(alethea) -> Categorial(alethea)\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Undimmed(x))\nOppositive(elaine) and not Categorial(elaine) -> Dotty(elaine)\n\nnot Undimmed(elaine)\n\ntherefore Undimmed(elaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Kitty is xlviii. Alix is fiberoptic. Donna is not bigeneric. Quiet people are third. If Donna is not xlviii and Donna is not laughing then Donna is third. If Alix is xlviii and Alix is not omissive then Alix is bigeneric. If Kitty is third then Kitty is bigeneric. All xlviii people are fiberoptic. If Alix is laughing and Alix is not bigeneric then Alix is third. Kitty is fiberoptic.", "logic": "\nXlviii(kitty)\nFiberoptic(alix)\nnot Bigeneric(donna)\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) -> Third(x))\nnot Xlviii(donna) and not Laughing(donna) -> Third(donna)\nXlviii(alix) and not Omissive(alix) -> Bigeneric(alix)\nThird(kitty) -> Bigeneric(kitty)\nforall x (Xlviii(x) -> Fiberoptic(x))\nLaughing(alix) and not Bigeneric(alix) -> Third(alix)\n\nFiberoptic(kitty)\n\nXlviii(kitty) and forall x (Xlviii(x) -> Fiberoptic(x)) -> therefore Fiberoptic(kitty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Zebedee is orwellian. Tilda is butcherly. Barri is not mousy. Quiet people are protruding. If Barri is not orwellian and Barri is not sixty then Barri is protruding. If Tilda is orwellian and Tilda is not migrant then Tilda is mousy. If Zebedee is protruding then Zebedee is mousy. All orwellian people are butcherly. If Tilda is sixty and Tilda is not mousy then Tilda is protruding. Zebedee is not butcherly.", "logic": "\nOrwellian(zebedee)\nButcherly(tilda)\nnot Mousy(barri)\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Protruding(x))\nnot Orwellian(barri) and not Sixty(barri) -> Protruding(barri)\nOrwellian(tilda) and not Migrant(tilda) -> Mousy(tilda)\nProtruding(zebedee) -> Mousy(zebedee)\nforall x (Orwellian(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nSixty(tilda) and not Mousy(tilda) -> Protruding(tilda)\n\nnot Butcherly(zebedee)\n\nOrwellian(zebedee) and forall x (Orwellian(x) -> Butcherly(x)) -> therefore Butcherly(zebedee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Atalanta is upward. Meghan is tomboyish. Linea is not uncomplete. Quiet people are incertain. If Linea is not upward and Linea is not sciatic then Linea is incertain. If Meghan is upward and Meghan is not gallican then Meghan is uncomplete. If Atalanta is incertain then Atalanta is uncomplete. All upward people are tomboyish. If Meghan is sciatic and Meghan is not uncomplete then Meghan is incertain. Atalanta is incertain.", "logic": "\nUpward(atalanta)\nTomboyish(meghan)\nnot Uncomplete(linea)\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) -> Incertain(x))\nnot Upward(linea) and not Sciatic(linea) -> Incertain(linea)\nUpward(meghan) and not Gallican(meghan) -> Uncomplete(meghan)\nIncertain(atalanta) -> Uncomplete(atalanta)\nforall x (Upward(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\nSciatic(meghan) and not Uncomplete(meghan) -> Incertain(meghan)\n\nIncertain(atalanta)\n\nUpward(atalanta) and forall x (Upward(x) -> Tomboyish(x)) -> therefore Tomboyish(atalanta) Tomboyish(atalanta) and forall x (Tomboyish(x) -> Incertain(x)) -> therefore Incertain(atalanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Henry is slubbed. Alfonzo is profaned. Todd is not played. Quiet people are hempen. If Todd is not slubbed and Todd is not tireless then Todd is hempen. If Alfonzo is slubbed and Alfonzo is not peroneal then Alfonzo is played. If Henry is hempen then Henry is played. All slubbed people are profaned. If Alfonzo is tireless and Alfonzo is not played then Alfonzo is hempen. Henry is not hempen.", "logic": "\nSlubbed(henry)\nProfaned(alfonzo)\nnot Played(todd)\nforall x (Profaned(x) -> Hempen(x))\nnot Slubbed(todd) and not Tireless(todd) -> Hempen(todd)\nSlubbed(alfonzo) and not Peroneal(alfonzo) -> Played(alfonzo)\nHempen(henry) -> Played(henry)\nforall x (Slubbed(x) -> Profaned(x))\nTireless(alfonzo) and not Played(alfonzo) -> Hempen(alfonzo)\n\nnot Hempen(henry)\n\nSlubbed(henry) and forall x (Slubbed(x) -> Profaned(x)) -> therefore Profaned(henry) Profaned(henry) and forall x (Profaned(x) -> Hempen(x)) -> therefore Hempen(henry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Anthony is especial. Lenard is peruvian. Nathalia is not infeasible. Quiet people are umber. If Nathalia is not especial and Nathalia is not detectable then Nathalia is umber. If Lenard is especial and Lenard is not cranky then Lenard is infeasible. If Anthony is umber then Anthony is infeasible. All especial people are peruvian. If Lenard is detectable and Lenard is not infeasible then Lenard is umber. Anthony is infeasible.", "logic": "\nEspecial(anthony)\nPeruvian(lenard)\nnot Infeasible(nathalia)\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> Umber(x))\nnot Especial(nathalia) and not Detectable(nathalia) -> Umber(nathalia)\nEspecial(lenard) and not Cranky(lenard) -> Infeasible(lenard)\nUmber(anthony) -> Infeasible(anthony)\nforall x (Especial(x) -> Peruvian(x))\nDetectable(lenard) and not Infeasible(lenard) -> Umber(lenard)\n\nInfeasible(anthony)\n\nEspecial(anthony) and forall x (Especial(x) -> Peruvian(x)) -> therefore Peruvian(anthony) Peruvian(anthony) and forall x (Peruvian(x) -> Umber(x)) -> therefore Umber(anthony) Umber(anthony) and Umber(anthony) -> Infeasible(anthony) -> therefore Infeasible(anthony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Jada is moorish. Cynthea is squirting. Doloritas is not baptized. Quiet people are immemorial. If Doloritas is not moorish and Doloritas is not belted then Doloritas is immemorial. If Cynthea is moorish and Cynthea is not stormproof then Cynthea is baptized. If Jada is immemorial then Jada is baptized. All moorish people are squirting. If Cynthea is belted and Cynthea is not baptized then Cynthea is immemorial. Jada is not baptized.", "logic": "\nMoorish(jada)\nSquirting(cynthea)\nnot Baptized(doloritas)\nforall x (Squirting(x) -> Immemorial(x))\nnot Moorish(doloritas) and not Belted(doloritas) -> Immemorial(doloritas)\nMoorish(cynthea) and not Stormproof(cynthea) -> Baptized(cynthea)\nImmemorial(jada) -> Baptized(jada)\nforall x (Moorish(x) -> Squirting(x))\nBelted(cynthea) and not Baptized(cynthea) -> Immemorial(cynthea)\n\nnot Baptized(jada)\n\nMoorish(jada) and forall x (Moorish(x) -> Squirting(x)) -> therefore Squirting(jada) Squirting(jada) and forall x (Squirting(x) -> Immemorial(x)) -> therefore Immemorial(jada) Immemorial(jada) and Immemorial(jada) -> Baptized(jada) -> therefore Baptized(jada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Granville is caucasian. Forster is surprising. Lissie is not bromidic. Quiet people are sybaritic. If Lissie is not caucasian and Lissie is not bolshevist then Lissie is sybaritic. If Forster is caucasian and Forster is not downward then Forster is bromidic. If Granville is sybaritic then Granville is bromidic. All caucasian people are surprising. If Forster is bolshevist and Forster is not bromidic then Forster is sybaritic. Lissie is not sybaritic.", "logic": "\nCaucasian(granville)\nSurprising(forster)\nnot Bromidic(lissie)\nforall x (Surprising(x) -> Sybaritic(x))\nnot Caucasian(lissie) and not Bolshevist(lissie) -> Sybaritic(lissie)\nCaucasian(forster) and not Downward(forster) -> Bromidic(forster)\nSybaritic(granville) -> Bromidic(granville)\nforall x (Caucasian(x) -> Surprising(x))\nBolshevist(forster) and not Bromidic(forster) -> Sybaritic(forster)\n\nnot Sybaritic(lissie)\n\nforall x (Surprising(x) -> Sybaritic(x)) <- forall x (Caucasian(x) -> Surprising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Vaclav is huffy. Christian is benevolent. Nev is not canorous. Quiet people are tense. If Nev is not huffy and Nev is not sedgy then Nev is tense. If Christian is huffy and Christian is not neat then Christian is canorous. If Vaclav is tense then Vaclav is canorous. All huffy people are benevolent. If Christian is sedgy and Christian is not canorous then Christian is tense. Christian is canorous.", "logic": "\nHuffy(vaclav)\nBenevolent(christian)\nnot Canorous(nev)\nforall x (Benevolent(x) -> Tense(x))\nnot Huffy(nev) and not Sedgy(nev) -> Tense(nev)\nHuffy(christian) and not Neat(christian) -> Canorous(christian)\nTense(vaclav) -> Canorous(vaclav)\nforall x (Huffy(x) -> Benevolent(x))\nSedgy(christian) and not Canorous(christian) -> Tense(christian)\n\nCanorous(christian)\n\nHuffy(christian) and not Neat(christian) -> Canorous(christian) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Lynne is formalized. Damita is mismatched. Janeczka is not camphoric. Quiet people are earlier. If Janeczka is not formalized and Janeczka is not aglitter then Janeczka is earlier. If Damita is formalized and Damita is not trussed then Damita is camphoric. If Lynne is earlier then Lynne is camphoric. All formalized people are mismatched. If Damita is aglitter and Damita is not camphoric then Damita is earlier. Janeczka is not mismatched.", "logic": "\nFormalized(lynne)\nMismatched(damita)\nnot Camphoric(janeczka)\nforall x (Mismatched(x) -> Earlier(x))\nnot Formalized(janeczka) and not Aglitter(janeczka) -> Earlier(janeczka)\nFormalized(damita) and not Trussed(damita) -> Camphoric(damita)\nEarlier(lynne) -> Camphoric(lynne)\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> Mismatched(x))\nAglitter(damita) and not Camphoric(damita) -> Earlier(damita)\n\nnot Mismatched(janeczka)\n\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> Mismatched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Maisey is formulaic. Lotty is pyramidic. Giorgi is not conjoint. Quiet people are homing. If Giorgi is not formulaic and Giorgi is not contented then Giorgi is homing. If Lotty is formulaic and Lotty is not bichrome then Lotty is conjoint. If Maisey is homing then Maisey is conjoint. All formulaic people are pyramidic. If Lotty is contented and Lotty is not conjoint then Lotty is homing. Lotty is cold.", "logic": "\nFormulaic(maisey)\nPyramidic(lotty)\nnot Conjoint(giorgi)\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) -> Homing(x))\nnot Formulaic(giorgi) and not Contented(giorgi) -> Homing(giorgi)\nFormulaic(lotty) and not Bichrome(lotty) -> Conjoint(lotty)\nHoming(maisey) -> Conjoint(maisey)\nforall x (Formulaic(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nContented(lotty) and not Conjoint(lotty) -> Homing(lotty)\n\nCold(lotty)\n\nCold(lotty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Garnette is extensible. Ingamar is postictal. Cary is not vaulting. Quiet people are blinded. If Cary is not extensible and Cary is not ramose then Cary is blinded. If Ingamar is extensible and Ingamar is not cerebral then Ingamar is vaulting. If Garnette is blinded then Garnette is vaulting. All extensible people are postictal. If Ingamar is ramose and Ingamar is not vaulting then Ingamar is blinded. Garnette is not cerebral.", "logic": "\nExtensible(garnette)\nPostictal(ingamar)\nnot Vaulting(cary)\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Blinded(x))\nnot Extensible(cary) and not Ramose(cary) -> Blinded(cary)\nExtensible(ingamar) and not Cerebral(ingamar) -> Vaulting(ingamar)\nBlinded(garnette) -> Vaulting(garnette)\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Postictal(x))\nRamose(ingamar) and not Vaulting(ingamar) -> Blinded(ingamar)\n\nnot Cerebral(garnette)\n\nnot Cerebral(garnette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Martin is downbound. Bethena is unassured. Meredithe is not colonized. Quiet people are throbbing. If Meredithe is not downbound and Meredithe is not uncleared then Meredithe is throbbing. If Bethena is downbound and Bethena is not sobering then Bethena is colonized. If Martin is throbbing then Martin is colonized. All downbound people are unassured. If Bethena is uncleared and Bethena is not colonized then Bethena is throbbing. Bethena is sobering.", "logic": "\nDownbound(martin)\nUnassured(bethena)\nnot Colonized(meredithe)\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Throbbing(x))\nnot Downbound(meredithe) and not Uncleared(meredithe) -> Throbbing(meredithe)\nDownbound(bethena) and not Sobering(bethena) -> Colonized(bethena)\nThrobbing(martin) -> Colonized(martin)\nforall x (Downbound(x) -> Unassured(x))\nUncleared(bethena) and not Colonized(bethena) -> Throbbing(bethena)\n\nSobering(bethena)\n\nSobering(bethena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Fonz is elaborate. Julian is tearful. Brittney is not antipodal. Quiet people are specious. If Brittney is not elaborate and Brittney is not taillike then Brittney is specious. If Julian is elaborate and Julian is not anosmic then Julian is antipodal. If Fonz is specious then Fonz is antipodal. All elaborate people are tearful. If Julian is taillike and Julian is not antipodal then Julian is specious. Fonz is not cold.", "logic": "\nElaborate(fonz)\nTearful(julian)\nnot Antipodal(brittney)\nforall x (Tearful(x) -> Specious(x))\nnot Elaborate(brittney) and not Taillike(brittney) -> Specious(brittney)\nElaborate(julian) and not Anosmic(julian) -> Antipodal(julian)\nSpecious(fonz) -> Antipodal(fonz)\nforall x (Elaborate(x) -> Tearful(x))\nTaillike(julian) and not Antipodal(julian) -> Specious(julian)\n\nnot Cold(fonz)\n\nnot Cold(fonz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Carl is modernized. Johann is fatalist. Claus is not hulky. Quiet people are peaceful. If Claus is not modernized and Claus is not hypnotized then Claus is peaceful. If Johann is modernized and Johann is not genoese then Johann is hulky. If Carl is peaceful then Carl is hulky. All modernized people are fatalist. If Johann is hypnotized and Johann is not hulky then Johann is peaceful. Johann is modernized.", "logic": "\nModernized(carl)\nFatalist(johann)\nnot Hulky(claus)\nforall x (Fatalist(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nnot Modernized(claus) and not Hypnotized(claus) -> Peaceful(claus)\nModernized(johann) and not Genoese(johann) -> Hulky(johann)\nPeaceful(carl) -> Hulky(carl)\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Fatalist(x))\nHypnotized(johann) and not Hulky(johann) -> Peaceful(johann)\n\nModernized(johann)\n\nModernized(johann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Winford is strep. Puff is unsounded. Jewel is unsounded. Gilles is unsounded. All hieratical, strep things are unshelled. If Winford is hieratical then Winford is gordian. If something is unsounded then it is hieratical. All gordian things are hieratical. All strep things are unsounded. If Gilles is ascending then Gilles is unsounded. Puff is unsounded.", "logic": "\nStrep(winford)\nUnsounded(puff)\nUnsounded(jewel)\nUnsounded(gilles)\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Strep(x) -> Unshelled(x))\nHieratical(winford) -> Gordian(winford)\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Gordian(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Unsounded(x))\nAscending(gilles) -> Unsounded(gilles)\n\nUnsounded(puff)\n\ntherefore Unsounded(puff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Etheline is mineral. Ellynn is placable. Missy is placable. Annabela is placable. All piagetian, mineral things are syncarpous. If Etheline is piagetian then Etheline is lone. If something is placable then it is piagetian. All lone things are piagetian. All mineral things are placable. If Annabela is unguarded then Annabela is placable. Ellynn is not placable.", "logic": "\nMineral(etheline)\nPlacable(ellynn)\nPlacable(missy)\nPlacable(annabela)\nforall x (Piagetian(x) and Mineral(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nPiagetian(etheline) -> Lone(etheline)\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Piagetian(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Piagetian(x))\nforall x (Mineral(x) -> Placable(x))\nUnguarded(annabela) -> Placable(annabela)\n\nnot Placable(ellynn)\n\ntherefore Placable(ellynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Maurice is obese. Ardella is chaldaean. Lucine is chaldaean. Pavel is chaldaean. All acaudate, obese things are apical. If Maurice is acaudate then Maurice is fitted. If something is chaldaean then it is acaudate. All fitted things are acaudate. All obese things are chaldaean. If Pavel is immature then Pavel is chaldaean. Maurice is chaldaean.", "logic": "\nObese(maurice)\nChaldaean(ardella)\nChaldaean(lucine)\nChaldaean(pavel)\nforall x (Acaudate(x) and Obese(x) -> Apical(x))\nAcaudate(maurice) -> Fitted(maurice)\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) -> Acaudate(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Acaudate(x))\nforall x (Obese(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\nImmature(pavel) -> Chaldaean(pavel)\n\nChaldaean(maurice)\n\nObese(maurice) and forall x (Obese(x) -> Chaldaean(x)) -> therefore Chaldaean(maurice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Stillmann is rifled. Herb is webby. Kelcy is webby. Kirstin is webby. All shintoist, rifled things are dilute. If Stillmann is shintoist then Stillmann is miniscule. If something is webby then it is shintoist. All miniscule things are shintoist. All rifled things are webby. If Kirstin is immediate then Kirstin is webby. Herb is not shintoist.", "logic": "\nRifled(stillmann)\nWebby(herb)\nWebby(kelcy)\nWebby(kirstin)\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and Rifled(x) -> Dilute(x))\nShintoist(stillmann) -> Miniscule(stillmann)\nforall x (Webby(x) -> Shintoist(x))\nforall x (Miniscule(x) -> Shintoist(x))\nforall x (Rifled(x) -> Webby(x))\nImmediate(kirstin) -> Webby(kirstin)\n\nnot Shintoist(herb)\n\nWebby(herb) and forall x (Webby(x) -> Shintoist(x)) -> therefore Shintoist(herb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Giorgio is glial. Keelia is lxxvii. Lorita is lxxvii. Johnathon is lxxvii. All sealed, glial things are tearing. If Giorgio is sealed then Giorgio is soigne. If something is lxxvii then it is sealed. All soigne things are sealed. All glial things are lxxvii. If Johnathon is flaunty then Johnathon is lxxvii. Giorgio is sealed.", "logic": "\nGlial(giorgio)\nLxxvii(keelia)\nLxxvii(lorita)\nLxxvii(johnathon)\nforall x (Sealed(x) and Glial(x) -> Tearing(x))\nSealed(giorgio) -> Soigne(giorgio)\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Sealed(x))\nforall x (Soigne(x) -> Sealed(x))\nforall x (Glial(x) -> Lxxvii(x))\nFlaunty(johnathon) -> Lxxvii(johnathon)\n\nSealed(giorgio)\n\nGlial(giorgio) and forall x (Glial(x) -> Lxxvii(x)) -> therefore Lxxvii(giorgio) Lxxvii(giorgio) and forall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Sealed(x)) -> therefore Sealed(giorgio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Neel is overactive. Benjie is shelvy. Marcy is shelvy. Eduard is shelvy. All rubicund, overactive things are angelical. If Neel is rubicund then Neel is quack. If something is shelvy then it is rubicund. All quack things are rubicund. All overactive things are shelvy. If Eduard is freshman then Eduard is shelvy. Neel is not rubicund.", "logic": "\nOveractive(neel)\nShelvy(benjie)\nShelvy(marcy)\nShelvy(eduard)\nforall x (Rubicund(x) and Overactive(x) -> Angelical(x))\nRubicund(neel) -> Quack(neel)\nforall x (Shelvy(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nFreshman(eduard) -> Shelvy(eduard)\n\nnot Rubicund(neel)\n\nOveractive(neel) and forall x (Overactive(x) -> Shelvy(x)) -> therefore Shelvy(neel) Shelvy(neel) and forall x (Shelvy(x) -> Rubicund(x)) -> therefore Rubicund(neel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Meyer is urgent. Levin is folding. Sinclair is folding. Rycca is folding. All diffusive, urgent things are developing. If Meyer is diffusive then Meyer is managerial. If something is folding then it is diffusive. All managerial things are diffusive. All urgent things are folding. If Rycca is rentable then Rycca is folding. Meyer is developing.", "logic": "\nUrgent(meyer)\nFolding(levin)\nFolding(sinclair)\nFolding(rycca)\nforall x (Diffusive(x) and Urgent(x) -> Developing(x))\nDiffusive(meyer) -> Managerial(meyer)\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Diffusive(x))\nforall x (Managerial(x) -> Diffusive(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Folding(x))\nRentable(rycca) -> Folding(rycca)\n\nDeveloping(meyer)\n\nUrgent(meyer) and forall x (Urgent(x) -> Folding(x)) -> therefore Folding(meyer) Folding(meyer) and forall x (Folding(x) -> Diffusive(x)) -> therefore Diffusive(meyer) Diffusive(meyer) and Urgent(meyer) and forall x (Diffusive(x) and Urgent(x) -> Developing(x)) -> therefore Developing(meyer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Viviyan is venose. Miquela is resolute. Yonina is resolute. Nancey is resolute. All quarterly, venose things are efficient. If Viviyan is quarterly then Viviyan is binomial. If something is resolute then it is quarterly. All binomial things are quarterly. All venose things are resolute. If Nancey is recovered then Nancey is resolute. Viviyan is not binomial.", "logic": "\nVenose(viviyan)\nResolute(miquela)\nResolute(yonina)\nResolute(nancey)\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and Venose(x) -> Efficient(x))\nQuarterly(viviyan) -> Binomial(viviyan)\nforall x (Resolute(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Binomial(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Resolute(x))\nRecovered(nancey) -> Resolute(nancey)\n\nnot Binomial(viviyan)\n\nVenose(viviyan) and forall x (Venose(x) -> Resolute(x)) -> therefore Resolute(viviyan) Resolute(viviyan) and forall x (Resolute(x) -> Quarterly(x)) -> therefore Quarterly(viviyan) Quarterly(viviyan) and Quarterly(viviyan) -> Binomial(viviyan) -> therefore Binomial(viviyan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Teador is unimposing. Lira is honeylike. Skipp is honeylike. Alicea is honeylike. All slouchy, unimposing things are analytical. If Teador is slouchy then Teador is selfless. If something is honeylike then it is slouchy. All selfless things are slouchy. All unimposing things are honeylike. If Alicea is flemish then Alicea is honeylike. Skipp is not analytical.", "logic": "\nUnimposing(teador)\nHoneylike(lira)\nHoneylike(skipp)\nHoneylike(alicea)\nforall x (Slouchy(x) and Unimposing(x) -> Analytical(x))\nSlouchy(teador) -> Selfless(teador)\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> Slouchy(x))\nforall x (Selfless(x) -> Slouchy(x))\nforall x (Unimposing(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nFlemish(alicea) -> Honeylike(alicea)\n\nnot Analytical(skipp)\n\nforall x (Slouchy(x) and Unimposing(x) -> Analytical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Job is bronzed. Hunter is boneheaded. Nela is boneheaded. Myrilla is boneheaded. All resinous, bronzed things are private. If Job is resinous then Job is crustacean. If something is boneheaded then it is resinous. All crustacean things are resinous. All bronzed things are boneheaded. If Myrilla is sweeping then Myrilla is boneheaded. Hunter is private.", "logic": "\nBronzed(job)\nBoneheaded(hunter)\nBoneheaded(nela)\nBoneheaded(myrilla)\nforall x (Resinous(x) and Bronzed(x) -> Private(x))\nResinous(job) -> Crustacean(job)\nforall x (Boneheaded(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Crustacean(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Bronzed(x) -> Boneheaded(x))\nSweeping(myrilla) -> Boneheaded(myrilla)\n\nPrivate(hunter)\n\nforall x (Resinous(x) and Bronzed(x) -> Private(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Clinton is diseased. Storm is begotten. Nichole is begotten. Gussy is begotten. All requisite, diseased things are dyslexic. If Clinton is requisite then Clinton is funerary. If something is begotten then it is requisite. All funerary things are requisite. All diseased things are begotten. If Gussy is barometric then Gussy is begotten. Gussy is not dyslexic.", "logic": "\nDiseased(clinton)\nBegotten(storm)\nBegotten(nichole)\nBegotten(gussy)\nforall x (Requisite(x) and Diseased(x) -> Dyslexic(x))\nRequisite(clinton) -> Funerary(clinton)\nforall x (Begotten(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Funerary(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> Begotten(x))\nBarometric(gussy) -> Begotten(gussy)\n\nnot Dyslexic(gussy)\n\nforall x (Requisite(x) and Diseased(x) -> Dyslexic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Malissa is late. Kathi is adamant. Barnabe is adamant. Bertha is adamant. All zionist, late things are carolean. If Malissa is zionist then Malissa is brutal. If something is adamant then it is zionist. All brutal things are zionist. All late things are adamant. If Bertha is downstream then Bertha is adamant. Barnabe is downstream.", "logic": "\nLate(malissa)\nAdamant(kathi)\nAdamant(barnabe)\nAdamant(bertha)\nforall x (Zionist(x) and Late(x) -> Carolean(x))\nZionist(malissa) -> Brutal(malissa)\nforall x (Adamant(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Zionist(x))\nforall x (Late(x) -> Adamant(x))\nDownstream(bertha) -> Adamant(bertha)\n\nDownstream(barnabe)\n\nDownstream(barnabe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Nilson is perfumed. Zeb is skyward. Willie is skyward. Renard is skyward. All transposed, perfumed things are banner. If Nilson is transposed then Nilson is upfront. If something is skyward then it is transposed. All upfront things are transposed. All perfumed things are skyward. If Renard is rubberlike then Renard is skyward. Willie is not kind.", "logic": "\nPerfumed(nilson)\nSkyward(zeb)\nSkyward(willie)\nSkyward(renard)\nforall x (Transposed(x) and Perfumed(x) -> Banner(x))\nTransposed(nilson) -> Upfront(nilson)\nforall x (Skyward(x) -> Transposed(x))\nforall x (Upfront(x) -> Transposed(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Skyward(x))\nRubberlike(renard) -> Skyward(renard)\n\nnot Kind(willie)\n\nnot Kind(willie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Davina is cinematic. Kordula is coagulable. Humphrey is coagulable. Pet is coagulable. All semiweekly, cinematic things are fettered. If Davina is semiweekly then Davina is unromantic. If something is coagulable then it is semiweekly. All unromantic things are semiweekly. All cinematic things are coagulable. If Pet is soluble then Pet is coagulable. Davina is kind.", "logic": "\nCinematic(davina)\nCoagulable(kordula)\nCoagulable(humphrey)\nCoagulable(pet)\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) and Cinematic(x) -> Fettered(x))\nSemiweekly(davina) -> Unromantic(davina)\nforall x (Coagulable(x) -> Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Cinematic(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nSoluble(pet) -> Coagulable(pet)\n\nKind(davina)\n\nKind(davina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Butler is squab. Madonna is mercantile. Suzetta is mercantile. Adlai is mercantile. All rewarding, squab things are thwarted. If Butler is rewarding then Butler is industrial. If something is mercantile then it is rewarding. All industrial things are rewarding. All squab things are mercantile. If Adlai is clangorous then Adlai is mercantile. Madonna is not kind.", "logic": "\nSquab(butler)\nMercantile(madonna)\nMercantile(suzetta)\nMercantile(adlai)\nforall x (Rewarding(x) and Squab(x) -> Thwarted(x))\nRewarding(butler) -> Industrial(butler)\nforall x (Mercantile(x) -> Rewarding(x))\nforall x (Industrial(x) -> Rewarding(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Mercantile(x))\nClangorous(adlai) -> Mercantile(adlai)\n\nnot Kind(madonna)\n\nnot Kind(madonna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Elfrida is masted. Shepherd is unsexed. Beale is unsexed. Douglass is unsexed. All cultivable, masted things are banal. If Elfrida is cultivable then Elfrida is celtic. If something is unsexed then it is cultivable. All celtic things are cultivable. All masted things are unsexed. If Douglass is ciliary then Douglass is unsexed. Beale is masted.", "logic": "\nMasted(elfrida)\nUnsexed(shepherd)\nUnsexed(beale)\nUnsexed(douglass)\nforall x (Cultivable(x) and Masted(x) -> Banal(x))\nCultivable(elfrida) -> Celtic(elfrida)\nforall x (Unsexed(x) -> Cultivable(x))\nforall x (Celtic(x) -> Cultivable(x))\nforall x (Masted(x) -> Unsexed(x))\nCiliary(douglass) -> Unsexed(douglass)\n\nMasted(beale)\n\nMasted(beale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Mona is botchy. Mona is calyceal. Mona is overstrung. Nice, tyrannic people are botchy. If Mona is calyceal then Mona is botchy. Quiet people are reconciled. If someone is tyrannic then they are cercarial. All overstrung people are cercarial. If someone is cercarial then they are tyrannic. All calyceal people are braw. If someone is cercarial and calyceal then they are braw. Mona is overstrung.", "logic": "\nBotchy(mona)\nCalyceal(mona)\nOverstrung(mona)\nforall x (Cercarial(x) and Tyrannic(x) -> Botchy(x))\nCalyceal(mona) -> Botchy(mona)\nforall x (Tyrannic(x) -> Reconciled(x))\nforall x (Tyrannic(x) -> Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Cercarial(x) -> Tyrannic(x))\nforall x (Calyceal(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Cercarial(x) and Calyceal(x) -> Braw(x))\n\nOverstrung(mona)\n\ntherefore Overstrung(mona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Martino is tyrolese. Martino is streaky. Martino is acidulent. Nice, bloodshot people are tyrolese. If Martino is streaky then Martino is tyrolese. Quiet people are throwback. If someone is bloodshot then they are exquisite. All acidulent people are exquisite. If someone is exquisite then they are bloodshot. All streaky people are averse. If someone is exquisite and streaky then they are averse. Martino is not streaky.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(martino)\nStreaky(martino)\nAcidulent(martino)\nforall x (Exquisite(x) and Bloodshot(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\nStreaky(martino) -> Tyrolese(martino)\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Throwback(x))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Exquisite(x))\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Exquisite(x))\nforall x (Exquisite(x) -> Bloodshot(x))\nforall x (Streaky(x) -> Averse(x))\nforall x (Exquisite(x) and Streaky(x) -> Averse(x))\n\nnot Streaky(martino)\n\ntherefore Streaky(martino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Alley is laotian. Alley is migratory. Alley is natal. Nice, flinty people are laotian. If Alley is migratory then Alley is laotian. Quiet people are papistic. If someone is flinty then they are visored. All natal people are visored. If someone is visored then they are flinty. All migratory people are adjusted. If someone is visored and migratory then they are adjusted. Alley is adjusted.", "logic": "\nLaotian(alley)\nMigratory(alley)\nNatal(alley)\nforall x (Visored(x) and Flinty(x) -> Laotian(x))\nMigratory(alley) -> Laotian(alley)\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Papistic(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Visored(x))\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Visored(x))\nforall x (Visored(x) -> Flinty(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) -> Adjusted(x))\nforall x (Visored(x) and Migratory(x) -> Adjusted(x))\n\nAdjusted(alley)\n\nMigratory(alley) and forall x (Migratory(x) -> Adjusted(x)) -> therefore Adjusted(alley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Jaynell is airheaded. Jaynell is tortious. Jaynell is secret. Nice, unsatiated people are airheaded. If Jaynell is tortious then Jaynell is airheaded. Quiet people are parentless. If someone is unsatiated then they are grenadian. All secret people are grenadian. If someone is grenadian then they are unsatiated. All tortious people are nineteen. If someone is grenadian and tortious then they are nineteen. Jaynell is not nineteen.", "logic": "\nAirheaded(jaynell)\nTortious(jaynell)\nSecret(jaynell)\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Unsatiated(x) -> Airheaded(x))\nTortious(jaynell) -> Airheaded(jaynell)\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) -> Parentless(x))\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) -> Grenadian(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) -> Grenadian(x))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Tortious(x) -> Nineteen(x))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) and Tortious(x) -> Nineteen(x))\n\nnot Nineteen(jaynell)\n\nTortious(jaynell) and forall x (Tortious(x) -> Nineteen(x)) -> therefore Nineteen(jaynell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Zola is inflatable. Zola is submersed. Zola is trilled. Nice, alated people are inflatable. If Zola is submersed then Zola is inflatable. Quiet people are curly. If someone is alated then they are unchewable. All trilled people are unchewable. If someone is unchewable then they are alated. All submersed people are unengaged. If someone is unchewable and submersed then they are unengaged. Zola is alated.", "logic": "\nInflatable(zola)\nSubmersed(zola)\nTrilled(zola)\nforall x (Unchewable(x) and Alated(x) -> Inflatable(x))\nSubmersed(zola) -> Inflatable(zola)\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Curly(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Unchewable(x))\nforall x (Trilled(x) -> Unchewable(x))\nforall x (Unchewable(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Submersed(x) -> Unengaged(x))\nforall x (Unchewable(x) and Submersed(x) -> Unengaged(x))\n\nAlated(zola)\n\nTrilled(zola) and forall x (Trilled(x) -> Unchewable(x)) -> therefore Unchewable(zola) Unchewable(zola) and forall x (Unchewable(x) -> Alated(x)) -> therefore Alated(zola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Maribeth is foggy. Maribeth is inbound. Maribeth is estuarine. Nice, zoic people are foggy. If Maribeth is inbound then Maribeth is foggy. Quiet people are nigerian. If someone is zoic then they are aided. All estuarine people are aided. If someone is aided then they are zoic. All inbound people are globular. If someone is aided and inbound then they are globular. Maribeth is not zoic.", "logic": "\nFoggy(maribeth)\nInbound(maribeth)\nEstuarine(maribeth)\nforall x (Aided(x) and Zoic(x) -> Foggy(x))\nInbound(maribeth) -> Foggy(maribeth)\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Nigerian(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Aided(x))\nforall x (Estuarine(x) -> Aided(x))\nforall x (Aided(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Inbound(x) -> Globular(x))\nforall x (Aided(x) and Inbound(x) -> Globular(x))\n\nnot Zoic(maribeth)\n\nEstuarine(maribeth) and forall x (Estuarine(x) -> Aided(x)) -> therefore Aided(maribeth) Aided(maribeth) and forall x (Aided(x) -> Zoic(x)) -> therefore Zoic(maribeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Janette is toiling. Janette is fake. Janette is ferocious. Nice, ohmic people are toiling. If Janette is fake then Janette is toiling. Quiet people are tapered. If someone is ohmic then they are residual. All ferocious people are residual. If someone is residual then they are ohmic. All fake people are whiskery. If someone is residual and fake then they are whiskery. Janette is tapered.", "logic": "\nToiling(janette)\nFake(janette)\nFerocious(janette)\nforall x (Residual(x) and Ohmic(x) -> Toiling(x))\nFake(janette) -> Toiling(janette)\nforall x (Ohmic(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Ohmic(x) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Ferocious(x) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Residual(x) -> Ohmic(x))\nforall x (Fake(x) -> Whiskery(x))\nforall x (Residual(x) and Fake(x) -> Whiskery(x))\n\nTapered(janette)\n\nFerocious(janette) and forall x (Ferocious(x) -> Residual(x)) -> therefore Residual(janette) Residual(janette) and forall x (Residual(x) -> Ohmic(x)) -> therefore Ohmic(janette) Ohmic(janette) and forall x (Ohmic(x) -> Tapered(x)) -> therefore Tapered(janette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Cordelie is rotatable. Cordelie is homiletic. Cordelie is leading. Nice, raftered people are rotatable. If Cordelie is homiletic then Cordelie is rotatable. Quiet people are devoid. If someone is raftered then they are mailed. All leading people are mailed. If someone is mailed then they are raftered. All homiletic people are megascopic. If someone is mailed and homiletic then they are megascopic. Cordelie is not devoid.", "logic": "\nRotatable(cordelie)\nHomiletic(cordelie)\nLeading(cordelie)\nforall x (Mailed(x) and Raftered(x) -> Rotatable(x))\nHomiletic(cordelie) -> Rotatable(cordelie)\nforall x (Raftered(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Raftered(x) -> Mailed(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) -> Mailed(x))\nforall x (Mailed(x) -> Raftered(x))\nforall x (Homiletic(x) -> Megascopic(x))\nforall x (Mailed(x) and Homiletic(x) -> Megascopic(x))\n\nnot Devoid(cordelie)\n\nLeading(cordelie) and forall x (Leading(x) -> Mailed(x)) -> therefore Mailed(cordelie) Mailed(cordelie) and forall x (Mailed(x) -> Raftered(x)) -> therefore Raftered(cordelie) Raftered(cordelie) and forall x (Raftered(x) -> Devoid(x)) -> therefore Devoid(cordelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "The kat does not chase the dabney. The kat slump the sunshine. The kat beef the dabney. The kat is antiguan. The kat is ringleted. The dabney slump the kat. The dabney slump the sunshine. The dabney beef the sunshine. The dabney is lofty. The dabney is allegiant. The dabney toss the sunshine. The sunshine slump the kat. The sunshine beef the kat. The sunshine is pressed. The sunshine does not visit the kat. The sunshine toss the dabney. If someone beef the dabney then they are lofty. If someone slump the dabney and they do not chase the kat then they are lofty. If the dabney beef the sunshine and the sunshine is lofty then the dabney is pressed. If someone beef the dabney then they visit the kat. If someone is allegiant then they eat the dabney. If the sunshine beef the kat and the kat does not visit the sunshine then the kat beef the sunshine. If the dabney toss the kat then the kat does not eat the sunshine. If someone slump the sunshine and they do not visit the dabney then the dabney is not lofty. The dabney slump the kat.", "logic": "\nnot Slump(kat, dabney)\nSlump(kat, sunshine)\nBeef(kat, dabney)\nAntiguan(kat)\nRingleted(kat)\nSlump(dabney, kat)\nSlump(dabney, sunshine)\nBeef(dabney, sunshine)\nLofty(dabney)\nAllegiant(dabney)\nToss(dabney, sunshine)\nSlump(sunshine, kat)\nBeef(sunshine, kat)\nPressed(sunshine)\nnot Toss(sunshine, kat)\nToss(sunshine, dabney)\nforall x (Beef(x, dabney) -> Lofty(x))\nforall x (Slump(x, dabney) and not Slump(x, kat) -> Lofty(x))\nBeef(dabney, sunshine) and Lofty(sunshine) -> Pressed(dabney)\nforall x (Beef(x, dabney) -> Toss(x, kat))\nforall x (Allegiant(x) -> Beef(x, dabney))\nBeef(sunshine, kat) and not Toss(kat, sunshine) -> Beef(kat, sunshine)\nToss(dabney, kat) -> not Beef(kat, sunshine)\nforall x (Slump(x, sunshine) and not Toss(x, dabney) -> not Lofty(dabney))\n\nSlump(dabney, kat)\n\ntherefore Slump(dabney, kat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The claude does not chase the bobinette. The claude commandeer the valina. The claude reorganise the bobinette. The claude is color. The claude is inordinate. The bobinette commandeer the claude. The bobinette commandeer the valina. The bobinette reorganise the valina. The bobinette is friendless. The bobinette is contextual. The bobinette commandeer the valina. The valina commandeer the claude. The valina reorganise the claude. The valina is atlantic. The valina does not visit the claude. The valina commandeer the bobinette. If someone reorganise the bobinette then they are friendless. If someone commandeer the bobinette and they do not chase the claude then they are friendless. If the bobinette reorganise the valina and the valina is friendless then the bobinette is atlantic. If someone reorganise the bobinette then they visit the claude. If someone is contextual then they eat the bobinette. If the valina reorganise the claude and the claude does not visit the valina then the claude reorganise the valina. If the bobinette commandeer the claude then the claude does not eat the valina. If someone commandeer the valina and they do not visit the bobinette then the bobinette is not friendless. The claude does not chase the valina.", "logic": "\nnot Commandeer(claude, bobinette)\nCommandeer(claude, valina)\nReorganise(claude, bobinette)\nColor(claude)\nInordinate(claude)\nCommandeer(bobinette, claude)\nCommandeer(bobinette, valina)\nReorganise(bobinette, valina)\nFriendless(bobinette)\nContextual(bobinette)\nCommandeer(bobinette, valina)\nCommandeer(valina, claude)\nReorganise(valina, claude)\nAtlantic(valina)\nnot Commandeer(valina, claude)\nCommandeer(valina, bobinette)\nforall x (Reorganise(x, bobinette) -> Friendless(x))\nforall x (Commandeer(x, bobinette) and not Commandeer(x, claude) -> Friendless(x))\nReorganise(bobinette, valina) and Friendless(valina) -> Atlantic(bobinette)\nforall x (Reorganise(x, bobinette) -> Commandeer(x, claude))\nforall x (Contextual(x) -> Reorganise(x, bobinette))\nReorganise(valina, claude) and not Commandeer(claude, valina) -> Reorganise(claude, valina)\nCommandeer(bobinette, claude) -> not Reorganise(claude, valina)\nforall x (Commandeer(x, valina) and not Commandeer(x, bobinette) -> not Friendless(bobinette))\n\nnot Commandeer(claude, valina)\n\ntherefore Commandeer(claude, valina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The berget does not chase the luana. The berget catechize the sullivan. The berget agnise the luana. The berget is fledgeless. The berget is bruneian. The luana catechize the berget. The luana catechize the sullivan. The luana agnise the sullivan. The luana is meritable. The luana is useless. The luana decussate the sullivan. The sullivan catechize the berget. The sullivan agnise the berget. The sullivan is brusk. The sullivan does not visit the berget. The sullivan decussate the luana. If someone agnise the luana then they are meritable. If someone catechize the luana and they do not chase the berget then they are meritable. If the luana agnise the sullivan and the sullivan is meritable then the luana is brusk. If someone agnise the luana then they visit the berget. If someone is useless then they eat the luana. If the sullivan agnise the berget and the berget does not visit the sullivan then the berget agnise the sullivan. If the luana decussate the berget then the berget does not eat the sullivan. If someone catechize the sullivan and they do not visit the luana then the luana is not meritable. The berget decussate the berget.", "logic": "\nnot Catechize(berget, luana)\nCatechize(berget, sullivan)\nAgnise(berget, luana)\nFledgeless(berget)\nBruneian(berget)\nCatechize(luana, berget)\nCatechize(luana, sullivan)\nAgnise(luana, sullivan)\nMeritable(luana)\nUseless(luana)\nDecussate(luana, sullivan)\nCatechize(sullivan, berget)\nAgnise(sullivan, berget)\nBrusk(sullivan)\nnot Decussate(sullivan, berget)\nDecussate(sullivan, luana)\nforall x (Agnise(x, luana) -> Meritable(x))\nforall x (Catechize(x, luana) and not Catechize(x, berget) -> Meritable(x))\nAgnise(luana, sullivan) and Meritable(sullivan) -> Brusk(luana)\nforall x (Agnise(x, luana) -> Decussate(x, berget))\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Agnise(x, luana))\nAgnise(sullivan, berget) and not Decussate(berget, sullivan) -> Agnise(berget, sullivan)\nDecussate(luana, berget) -> not Agnise(berget, sullivan)\nforall x (Catechize(x, sullivan) and not Decussate(x, luana) -> not Meritable(luana))\n\nDecussate(berget, berget)\n\nAgnise(berget, luana) and forall x (Agnise(x, luana) -> Decussate(x, berget)) -> therefore Decussate(berget, berget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The ariadne does not chase the noell. The ariadne gloss the bellina. The ariadne revivify the noell. The ariadne is saxatile. The ariadne is beetle. The noell gloss the ariadne. The noell gloss the bellina. The noell revivify the bellina. The noell is becoming. The noell is careworn. The noell tailor the bellina. The bellina gloss the ariadne. The bellina revivify the ariadne. The bellina is pouched. The bellina does not visit the ariadne. The bellina tailor the noell. If someone revivify the noell then they are becoming. If someone gloss the noell and they do not chase the ariadne then they are becoming. If the noell revivify the bellina and the bellina is becoming then the noell is pouched. If someone revivify the noell then they visit the ariadne. If someone is careworn then they eat the noell. If the bellina revivify the ariadne and the ariadne does not visit the bellina then the ariadne revivify the bellina. If the noell tailor the ariadne then the ariadne does not eat the bellina. If someone gloss the bellina and they do not visit the noell then the noell is not becoming. The noell does not eat the noell.", "logic": "\nnot Gloss(ariadne, noell)\nGloss(ariadne, bellina)\nRevivify(ariadne, noell)\nSaxatile(ariadne)\nBeetle(ariadne)\nGloss(noell, ariadne)\nGloss(noell, bellina)\nRevivify(noell, bellina)\nBecoming(noell)\nCareworn(noell)\nTailor(noell, bellina)\nGloss(bellina, ariadne)\nRevivify(bellina, ariadne)\nPouched(bellina)\nnot Tailor(bellina, ariadne)\nTailor(bellina, noell)\nforall x (Revivify(x, noell) -> Becoming(x))\nforall x (Gloss(x, noell) and not Gloss(x, ariadne) -> Becoming(x))\nRevivify(noell, bellina) and Becoming(bellina) -> Pouched(noell)\nforall x (Revivify(x, noell) -> Tailor(x, ariadne))\nforall x (Careworn(x) -> Revivify(x, noell))\nRevivify(bellina, ariadne) and not Tailor(ariadne, bellina) -> Revivify(ariadne, bellina)\nTailor(noell, ariadne) -> not Revivify(ariadne, bellina)\nforall x (Gloss(x, bellina) and not Tailor(x, noell) -> not Becoming(noell))\n\nnot Revivify(noell, noell)\n\nCareworn(noell) and forall x (Careworn(x) -> Revivify(x, noell)) -> therefore Revivify(noell, noell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The rita does not chase the stephani. The rita differ the fredia. The rita insulate the stephani. The rita is perverted. The rita is adult. The stephani differ the rita. The stephani differ the fredia. The stephani insulate the fredia. The stephani is renewed. The stephani is heinous. The stephani carmine the fredia. The fredia differ the rita. The fredia insulate the rita. The fredia is affecting. The fredia does not visit the rita. The fredia carmine the stephani. If someone insulate the stephani then they are renewed. If someone differ the stephani and they do not chase the rita then they are renewed. If the stephani insulate the fredia and the fredia is renewed then the stephani is affecting. If someone insulate the stephani then they visit the rita. If someone is heinous then they eat the stephani. If the fredia insulate the rita and the rita does not visit the fredia then the rita insulate the fredia. If the stephani carmine the rita then the rita does not eat the fredia. If someone differ the fredia and they do not visit the stephani then the stephani is not renewed. The stephani carmine the rita.", "logic": "\nnot Differ(rita, stephani)\nDiffer(rita, fredia)\nInsulate(rita, stephani)\nPerverted(rita)\nAdult(rita)\nDiffer(stephani, rita)\nDiffer(stephani, fredia)\nInsulate(stephani, fredia)\nRenewed(stephani)\nHeinous(stephani)\nCarmine(stephani, fredia)\nDiffer(fredia, rita)\nInsulate(fredia, rita)\nAffecting(fredia)\nnot Carmine(fredia, rita)\nCarmine(fredia, stephani)\nforall x (Insulate(x, stephani) -> Renewed(x))\nforall x (Differ(x, stephani) and not Differ(x, rita) -> Renewed(x))\nInsulate(stephani, fredia) and Renewed(fredia) -> Affecting(stephani)\nforall x (Insulate(x, stephani) -> Carmine(x, rita))\nforall x (Heinous(x) -> Insulate(x, stephani))\nInsulate(fredia, rita) and not Carmine(rita, fredia) -> Insulate(rita, fredia)\nCarmine(stephani, rita) -> not Insulate(rita, fredia)\nforall x (Differ(x, fredia) and not Carmine(x, stephani) -> not Renewed(stephani))\n\nCarmine(stephani, rita)\n\nHeinous(stephani) and forall x (Heinous(x) -> Insulate(x, stephani)) -> therefore Insulate(stephani, stephani) Insulate(stephani, stephani) and forall x (Insulate(x, stephani) -> Carmine(x, rita)) -> therefore Carmine(stephani, rita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The dalenna does not chase the chiarra. The dalenna altercate the hoyt. The dalenna misdeal the chiarra. The dalenna is tattered. The dalenna is meshugga. The chiarra altercate the dalenna. The chiarra altercate the hoyt. The chiarra misdeal the hoyt. The chiarra is xlvii. The chiarra is solo. The chiarra truncate the hoyt. The hoyt altercate the dalenna. The hoyt misdeal the dalenna. The hoyt is caesural. The hoyt does not visit the dalenna. The hoyt truncate the chiarra. If someone misdeal the chiarra then they are xlvii. If someone altercate the chiarra and they do not chase the dalenna then they are xlvii. If the chiarra misdeal the hoyt and the hoyt is xlvii then the chiarra is caesural. If someone misdeal the chiarra then they visit the dalenna. If someone is solo then they eat the chiarra. If the hoyt misdeal the dalenna and the dalenna does not visit the hoyt then the dalenna misdeal the hoyt. If the chiarra truncate the dalenna then the dalenna does not eat the hoyt. If someone altercate the hoyt and they do not visit the chiarra then the chiarra is not xlvii. The chiarra does not visit the dalenna.", "logic": "\nnot Altercate(dalenna, chiarra)\nAltercate(dalenna, hoyt)\nMisdeal(dalenna, chiarra)\nTattered(dalenna)\nMeshugga(dalenna)\nAltercate(chiarra, dalenna)\nAltercate(chiarra, hoyt)\nMisdeal(chiarra, hoyt)\nXlvii(chiarra)\nSolo(chiarra)\nTruncate(chiarra, hoyt)\nAltercate(hoyt, dalenna)\nMisdeal(hoyt, dalenna)\nCaesural(hoyt)\nnot Truncate(hoyt, dalenna)\nTruncate(hoyt, chiarra)\nforall x (Misdeal(x, chiarra) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Altercate(x, chiarra) and not Altercate(x, dalenna) -> Xlvii(x))\nMisdeal(chiarra, hoyt) and Xlvii(hoyt) -> Caesural(chiarra)\nforall x (Misdeal(x, chiarra) -> Truncate(x, dalenna))\nforall x (Solo(x) -> Misdeal(x, chiarra))\nMisdeal(hoyt, dalenna) and not Truncate(dalenna, hoyt) -> Misdeal(dalenna, hoyt)\nTruncate(chiarra, dalenna) -> not Misdeal(dalenna, hoyt)\nforall x (Altercate(x, hoyt) and not Truncate(x, chiarra) -> not Xlvii(chiarra))\n\nnot Truncate(chiarra, dalenna)\n\nSolo(chiarra) and forall x (Solo(x) -> Misdeal(x, chiarra)) -> therefore Misdeal(chiarra, chiarra) Misdeal(chiarra, chiarra) and forall x (Misdeal(x, chiarra) -> Truncate(x, dalenna)) -> therefore Truncate(chiarra, dalenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The cybel does not chase the vinni. The cybel edit the roth. The cybel syncretize the vinni. The cybel is stalinist. The cybel is archducal. The vinni edit the cybel. The vinni edit the roth. The vinni syncretize the roth. The vinni is stemmatic. The vinni is allantoic. The vinni light the roth. The roth edit the cybel. The roth syncretize the cybel. The roth is lambent. The roth does not visit the cybel. The roth light the vinni. If someone syncretize the vinni then they are stemmatic. If someone edit the vinni and they do not chase the cybel then they are stemmatic. If the vinni syncretize the roth and the roth is stemmatic then the vinni is lambent. If someone syncretize the vinni then they visit the cybel. If someone is allantoic then they eat the vinni. If the roth syncretize the cybel and the cybel does not visit the roth then the cybel syncretize the roth. If the vinni light the cybel then the cybel does not eat the roth. If someone edit the roth and they do not visit the vinni then the vinni is not stemmatic. The cybel does not eat the roth.", "logic": "\nnot Edit(cybel, vinni)\nEdit(cybel, roth)\nSyncretize(cybel, vinni)\nStalinist(cybel)\nArchducal(cybel)\nEdit(vinni, cybel)\nEdit(vinni, roth)\nSyncretize(vinni, roth)\nStemmatic(vinni)\nAllantoic(vinni)\nLight(vinni, roth)\nEdit(roth, cybel)\nSyncretize(roth, cybel)\nLambent(roth)\nnot Light(roth, cybel)\nLight(roth, vinni)\nforall x (Syncretize(x, vinni) -> Stemmatic(x))\nforall x (Edit(x, vinni) and not Edit(x, cybel) -> Stemmatic(x))\nSyncretize(vinni, roth) and Stemmatic(roth) -> Lambent(vinni)\nforall x (Syncretize(x, vinni) -> Light(x, cybel))\nforall x (Allantoic(x) -> Syncretize(x, vinni))\nSyncretize(roth, cybel) and not Light(cybel, roth) -> Syncretize(cybel, roth)\nLight(vinni, cybel) -> not Syncretize(cybel, roth)\nforall x (Edit(x, roth) and not Light(x, vinni) -> not Stemmatic(vinni))\n\nnot Syncretize(cybel, roth)\n\nAllantoic(vinni) and forall x (Allantoic(x) -> Syncretize(x, vinni)) -> therefore Syncretize(vinni, vinni) Syncretize(vinni, vinni) and forall x (Syncretize(x, vinni) -> Light(x, cybel)) -> therefore Light(vinni, cybel) Light(vinni, cybel) and Light(vinni, cybel) -> not Syncretize(cybel, roth) -> therefore not Syncretize(cybel, roth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The tommi does not chase the aidan. The tommi whirl the audra. The tommi breeze the aidan. The tommi is limbless. The tommi is rococo. The aidan whirl the tommi. The aidan whirl the audra. The aidan breeze the audra. The aidan is innocuous. The aidan is ninefold. The aidan denigrate the audra. The audra whirl the tommi. The audra breeze the tommi. The audra is ostensive. The audra does not visit the tommi. The audra denigrate the aidan. If someone breeze the aidan then they are innocuous. If someone whirl the aidan and they do not chase the tommi then they are innocuous. If the aidan breeze the audra and the audra is innocuous then the aidan is ostensive. If someone breeze the aidan then they visit the tommi. If someone is ninefold then they eat the aidan. If the audra breeze the tommi and the tommi does not visit the audra then the tommi breeze the audra. If the aidan denigrate the tommi then the tommi does not eat the audra. If someone whirl the audra and they do not visit the aidan then the aidan is not innocuous. The tommi breeze the audra.", "logic": "\nnot Whirl(tommi, aidan)\nWhirl(tommi, audra)\nBreeze(tommi, aidan)\nLimbless(tommi)\nRococo(tommi)\nWhirl(aidan, tommi)\nWhirl(aidan, audra)\nBreeze(aidan, audra)\nInnocuous(aidan)\nNinefold(aidan)\nDenigrate(aidan, audra)\nWhirl(audra, tommi)\nBreeze(audra, tommi)\nOstensive(audra)\nnot Denigrate(audra, tommi)\nDenigrate(audra, aidan)\nforall x (Breeze(x, aidan) -> Innocuous(x))\nforall x (Whirl(x, aidan) and not Whirl(x, tommi) -> Innocuous(x))\nBreeze(aidan, audra) and Innocuous(audra) -> Ostensive(aidan)\nforall x (Breeze(x, aidan) -> Denigrate(x, tommi))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) -> Breeze(x, aidan))\nBreeze(audra, tommi) and not Denigrate(tommi, audra) -> Breeze(tommi, audra)\nDenigrate(aidan, tommi) -> not Breeze(tommi, audra)\nforall x (Whirl(x, audra) and not Denigrate(x, aidan) -> not Innocuous(aidan))\n\nBreeze(tommi, audra)\n\nNinefold(aidan) and forall x (Ninefold(x) -> Breeze(x, aidan)) -> therefore Breeze(aidan, aidan) Breeze(aidan, aidan) and forall x (Breeze(x, aidan) -> Denigrate(x, tommi)) -> therefore Denigrate(aidan, tommi) Denigrate(aidan, tommi) and Denigrate(aidan, tommi) -> not Breeze(tommi, audra) -> therefore not Breeze(tommi, audra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The gillan does not chase the fredra. The gillan recurve the wilie. The gillan beak the fredra. The gillan is methodist. The gillan is motionless. The fredra recurve the gillan. The fredra recurve the wilie. The fredra beak the wilie. The fredra is goofy. The fredra is lightproof. The fredra tariff the wilie. The wilie recurve the gillan. The wilie beak the gillan. The wilie is headless. The wilie does not visit the gillan. The wilie tariff the fredra. If someone beak the fredra then they are goofy. If someone recurve the fredra and they do not chase the gillan then they are goofy. If the fredra beak the wilie and the wilie is goofy then the fredra is headless. If someone beak the fredra then they visit the gillan. If someone is lightproof then they eat the fredra. If the wilie beak the gillan and the gillan does not visit the wilie then the gillan beak the wilie. If the fredra tariff the gillan then the gillan does not eat the wilie. If someone recurve the wilie and they do not visit the fredra then the fredra is not goofy. The fredra is not headless.", "logic": "\nnot Recurve(gillan, fredra)\nRecurve(gillan, wilie)\nBeak(gillan, fredra)\nMethodist(gillan)\nMotionless(gillan)\nRecurve(fredra, gillan)\nRecurve(fredra, wilie)\nBeak(fredra, wilie)\nGoofy(fredra)\nLightproof(fredra)\nTariff(fredra, wilie)\nRecurve(wilie, gillan)\nBeak(wilie, gillan)\nHeadless(wilie)\nnot Tariff(wilie, gillan)\nTariff(wilie, fredra)\nforall x (Beak(x, fredra) -> Goofy(x))\nforall x (Recurve(x, fredra) and not Recurve(x, gillan) -> Goofy(x))\nBeak(fredra, wilie) and Goofy(wilie) -> Headless(fredra)\nforall x (Beak(x, fredra) -> Tariff(x, gillan))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Beak(x, fredra))\nBeak(wilie, gillan) and not Tariff(gillan, wilie) -> Beak(gillan, wilie)\nTariff(fredra, gillan) -> not Beak(gillan, wilie)\nforall x (Recurve(x, wilie) and not Tariff(x, fredra) -> not Goofy(fredra))\n\nnot Headless(fredra)\n\nBeak(fredra, wilie) and Goofy(wilie) -> Headless(fredra) <- forall x (Beak(x, fredra) -> Goofy(x)) <- forall x (Lightproof(x) -> Beak(x, fredra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The andria does not chase the lesley. The andria invaginate the constanta. The andria accompany the lesley. The andria is craggy. The andria is nubbly. The lesley invaginate the andria. The lesley invaginate the constanta. The lesley accompany the constanta. The lesley is lobular. The lesley is rimed. The lesley plank the constanta. The constanta invaginate the andria. The constanta accompany the andria. The constanta is unwell. The constanta does not visit the andria. The constanta plank the lesley. If someone accompany the lesley then they are lobular. If someone invaginate the lesley and they do not chase the andria then they are lobular. If the lesley accompany the constanta and the constanta is lobular then the lesley is unwell. If someone accompany the lesley then they visit the andria. If someone is rimed then they eat the lesley. If the constanta accompany the andria and the andria does not visit the constanta then the andria accompany the constanta. If the lesley plank the andria then the andria does not eat the constanta. If someone invaginate the constanta and they do not visit the lesley then the lesley is not lobular. The constanta accompany the lesley.", "logic": "\nnot Invaginate(andria, lesley)\nInvaginate(andria, constanta)\nAccompany(andria, lesley)\nCraggy(andria)\nNubbly(andria)\nInvaginate(lesley, andria)\nInvaginate(lesley, constanta)\nAccompany(lesley, constanta)\nLobular(lesley)\nRimed(lesley)\nPlank(lesley, constanta)\nInvaginate(constanta, andria)\nAccompany(constanta, andria)\nUnwell(constanta)\nnot Plank(constanta, andria)\nPlank(constanta, lesley)\nforall x (Accompany(x, lesley) -> Lobular(x))\nforall x (Invaginate(x, lesley) and not Invaginate(x, andria) -> Lobular(x))\nAccompany(lesley, constanta) and Lobular(constanta) -> Unwell(lesley)\nforall x (Accompany(x, lesley) -> Plank(x, andria))\nforall x (Rimed(x) -> Accompany(x, lesley))\nAccompany(constanta, andria) and not Plank(andria, constanta) -> Accompany(andria, constanta)\nPlank(lesley, andria) -> not Accompany(andria, constanta)\nforall x (Invaginate(x, constanta) and not Plank(x, lesley) -> not Lobular(lesley))\n\nAccompany(constanta, lesley)\n\nforall x (Rimed(x) -> Accompany(x, lesley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The florri does not chase the jaymee. The florri waggle the lebbie. The florri narrate the jaymee. The florri is impressive. The florri is antennary. The jaymee waggle the florri. The jaymee waggle the lebbie. The jaymee narrate the lebbie. The jaymee is swiss. The jaymee is stomatal. The jaymee exuviate the lebbie. The lebbie waggle the florri. The lebbie narrate the florri. The lebbie is parisian. The lebbie does not visit the florri. The lebbie exuviate the jaymee. If someone narrate the jaymee then they are swiss. If someone waggle the jaymee and they do not chase the florri then they are swiss. If the jaymee narrate the lebbie and the lebbie is swiss then the jaymee is parisian. If someone narrate the jaymee then they visit the florri. If someone is stomatal then they eat the jaymee. If the lebbie narrate the florri and the florri does not visit the lebbie then the florri narrate the lebbie. If the jaymee exuviate the florri then the florri does not eat the lebbie. If someone waggle the lebbie and they do not visit the jaymee then the jaymee is not swiss. The lebbie is not swiss.", "logic": "\nnot Waggle(florri, jaymee)\nWaggle(florri, lebbie)\nNarrate(florri, jaymee)\nImpressive(florri)\nAntennary(florri)\nWaggle(jaymee, florri)\nWaggle(jaymee, lebbie)\nNarrate(jaymee, lebbie)\nSwiss(jaymee)\nStomatal(jaymee)\nExuviate(jaymee, lebbie)\nWaggle(lebbie, florri)\nNarrate(lebbie, florri)\nParisian(lebbie)\nnot Exuviate(lebbie, florri)\nExuviate(lebbie, jaymee)\nforall x (Narrate(x, jaymee) -> Swiss(x))\nforall x (Waggle(x, jaymee) and not Waggle(x, florri) -> Swiss(x))\nNarrate(jaymee, lebbie) and Swiss(lebbie) -> Parisian(jaymee)\nforall x (Narrate(x, jaymee) -> Exuviate(x, florri))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> Narrate(x, jaymee))\nNarrate(lebbie, florri) and not Exuviate(florri, lebbie) -> Narrate(florri, lebbie)\nExuviate(jaymee, florri) -> not Narrate(florri, lebbie)\nforall x (Waggle(x, lebbie) and not Exuviate(x, jaymee) -> not Swiss(jaymee))\n\nnot Swiss(lebbie)\n\nforall x (Narrate(x, jaymee) -> Swiss(x)) <- forall x (Stomatal(x) -> Narrate(x, jaymee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The alysia does not chase the oona. The alysia smuggle the dyan. The alysia construct the oona. The alysia is noseless. The alysia is dilettante. The oona smuggle the alysia. The oona smuggle the dyan. The oona construct the dyan. The oona is splashed. The oona is evaluative. The oona assault the dyan. The dyan smuggle the alysia. The dyan construct the alysia. The dyan is afoul. The dyan does not visit the alysia. The dyan assault the oona. If someone construct the oona then they are splashed. If someone smuggle the oona and they do not chase the alysia then they are splashed. If the oona construct the dyan and the dyan is splashed then the oona is afoul. If someone construct the oona then they visit the alysia. If someone is evaluative then they eat the oona. If the dyan construct the alysia and the alysia does not visit the dyan then the alysia construct the dyan. If the oona assault the alysia then the alysia does not eat the dyan. If someone smuggle the dyan and they do not visit the oona then the oona is not splashed. The oona assault the oona.", "logic": "\nnot Smuggle(alysia, oona)\nSmuggle(alysia, dyan)\nConstruct(alysia, oona)\nNoseless(alysia)\nDilettante(alysia)\nSmuggle(oona, alysia)\nSmuggle(oona, dyan)\nConstruct(oona, dyan)\nSplashed(oona)\nEvaluative(oona)\nAssault(oona, dyan)\nSmuggle(dyan, alysia)\nConstruct(dyan, alysia)\nAfoul(dyan)\nnot Assault(dyan, alysia)\nAssault(dyan, oona)\nforall x (Construct(x, oona) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Smuggle(x, oona) and not Smuggle(x, alysia) -> Splashed(x))\nConstruct(oona, dyan) and Splashed(dyan) -> Afoul(oona)\nforall x (Construct(x, oona) -> Assault(x, alysia))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Construct(x, oona))\nConstruct(dyan, alysia) and not Assault(alysia, dyan) -> Construct(alysia, dyan)\nAssault(oona, alysia) -> not Construct(alysia, dyan)\nforall x (Smuggle(x, dyan) and not Assault(x, oona) -> not Splashed(oona))\n\nAssault(oona, oona)\n\nAssault(oona, oona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The patin does not chase the nertie. The patin regenerate the erich. The patin misname the nertie. The patin is polyatomic. The patin is planar. The nertie regenerate the patin. The nertie regenerate the erich. The nertie misname the erich. The nertie is behind. The nertie is minatory. The nertie dizen the erich. The erich regenerate the patin. The erich misname the patin. The erich is innocuous. The erich does not visit the patin. The erich dizen the nertie. If someone misname the nertie then they are behind. If someone regenerate the nertie and they do not chase the patin then they are behind. If the nertie misname the erich and the erich is behind then the nertie is innocuous. If someone misname the nertie then they visit the patin. If someone is minatory then they eat the nertie. If the erich misname the patin and the patin does not visit the erich then the patin misname the erich. If the nertie dizen the patin then the patin does not eat the erich. If someone regenerate the erich and they do not visit the nertie then the nertie is not behind. The patin does not visit the nertie.", "logic": "\nnot Regenerate(patin, nertie)\nRegenerate(patin, erich)\nMisname(patin, nertie)\nPolyatomic(patin)\nPlanar(patin)\nRegenerate(nertie, patin)\nRegenerate(nertie, erich)\nMisname(nertie, erich)\nBehind(nertie)\nMinatory(nertie)\nDizen(nertie, erich)\nRegenerate(erich, patin)\nMisname(erich, patin)\nInnocuous(erich)\nnot Dizen(erich, patin)\nDizen(erich, nertie)\nforall x (Misname(x, nertie) -> Behind(x))\nforall x (Regenerate(x, nertie) and not Regenerate(x, patin) -> Behind(x))\nMisname(nertie, erich) and Behind(erich) -> Innocuous(nertie)\nforall x (Misname(x, nertie) -> Dizen(x, patin))\nforall x (Minatory(x) -> Misname(x, nertie))\nMisname(erich, patin) and not Dizen(patin, erich) -> Misname(patin, erich)\nDizen(nertie, patin) -> not Misname(patin, erich)\nforall x (Regenerate(x, erich) and not Dizen(x, nertie) -> not Behind(nertie))\n\nnot Dizen(patin, nertie)\n\nnot Dizen(patin, nertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The sandye does not chase the inga. The sandye outwit the menard. The sandye militarise the inga. The sandye is longtime. The sandye is downstream. The inga outwit the sandye. The inga outwit the menard. The inga militarise the menard. The inga is alone. The inga is maniacal. The inga mutate the menard. The menard outwit the sandye. The menard militarise the sandye. The menard is clerical. The menard does not visit the sandye. The menard mutate the inga. If someone militarise the inga then they are alone. If someone outwit the inga and they do not chase the sandye then they are alone. If the inga militarise the menard and the menard is alone then the inga is clerical. If someone militarise the inga then they visit the sandye. If someone is maniacal then they eat the inga. If the menard militarise the sandye and the sandye does not visit the menard then the sandye militarise the menard. If the inga mutate the sandye then the sandye does not eat the menard. If someone outwit the menard and they do not visit the inga then the inga is not alone. The sandye militarise the sandye.", "logic": "\nnot Outwit(sandye, inga)\nOutwit(sandye, menard)\nMilitarise(sandye, inga)\nLongtime(sandye)\nDownstream(sandye)\nOutwit(inga, sandye)\nOutwit(inga, menard)\nMilitarise(inga, menard)\nAlone(inga)\nManiacal(inga)\nMutate(inga, menard)\nOutwit(menard, sandye)\nMilitarise(menard, sandye)\nClerical(menard)\nnot Mutate(menard, sandye)\nMutate(menard, inga)\nforall x (Militarise(x, inga) -> Alone(x))\nforall x (Outwit(x, inga) and not Outwit(x, sandye) -> Alone(x))\nMilitarise(inga, menard) and Alone(menard) -> Clerical(inga)\nforall x (Militarise(x, inga) -> Mutate(x, sandye))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Militarise(x, inga))\nMilitarise(menard, sandye) and not Mutate(sandye, menard) -> Militarise(sandye, menard)\nMutate(inga, sandye) -> not Militarise(sandye, menard)\nforall x (Outwit(x, menard) and not Mutate(x, inga) -> not Alone(inga))\n\nMilitarise(sandye, sandye)\n\nMilitarise(sandye, sandye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The sondra does not chase the tymothy. The sondra choke the ricardo. The sondra miscount the tymothy. The sondra is sunbaked. The sondra is connatural. The tymothy choke the sondra. The tymothy choke the ricardo. The tymothy miscount the ricardo. The tymothy is loveable. The tymothy is malaysian. The tymothy decompose the ricardo. The ricardo choke the sondra. The ricardo miscount the sondra. The ricardo is venose. The ricardo does not visit the sondra. The ricardo decompose the tymothy. If someone miscount the tymothy then they are loveable. If someone choke the tymothy and they do not chase the sondra then they are loveable. If the tymothy miscount the ricardo and the ricardo is loveable then the tymothy is venose. If someone miscount the tymothy then they visit the sondra. If someone is malaysian then they eat the tymothy. If the ricardo miscount the sondra and the sondra does not visit the ricardo then the sondra miscount the ricardo. If the tymothy decompose the sondra then the sondra does not eat the ricardo. If someone choke the ricardo and they do not visit the tymothy then the tymothy is not loveable. The sondra is not venose.", "logic": "\nnot Choke(sondra, tymothy)\nChoke(sondra, ricardo)\nMiscount(sondra, tymothy)\nSunbaked(sondra)\nConnatural(sondra)\nChoke(tymothy, sondra)\nChoke(tymothy, ricardo)\nMiscount(tymothy, ricardo)\nLoveable(tymothy)\nMalaysian(tymothy)\nDecompose(tymothy, ricardo)\nChoke(ricardo, sondra)\nMiscount(ricardo, sondra)\nVenose(ricardo)\nnot Decompose(ricardo, sondra)\nDecompose(ricardo, tymothy)\nforall x (Miscount(x, tymothy) -> Loveable(x))\nforall x (Choke(x, tymothy) and not Choke(x, sondra) -> Loveable(x))\nMiscount(tymothy, ricardo) and Loveable(ricardo) -> Venose(tymothy)\nforall x (Miscount(x, tymothy) -> Decompose(x, sondra))\nforall x (Malaysian(x) -> Miscount(x, tymothy))\nMiscount(ricardo, sondra) and not Decompose(sondra, ricardo) -> Miscount(sondra, ricardo)\nDecompose(tymothy, sondra) -> not Miscount(sondra, ricardo)\nforall x (Choke(x, ricardo) and not Decompose(x, tymothy) -> not Loveable(tymothy))\n\nnot Venose(sondra)\n\nnot Venose(sondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The loella does not chase the neddy. The loella towel the jaimie. The loella delegate the neddy. The loella is zionist. The loella is harnessed. The neddy towel the loella. The neddy towel the jaimie. The neddy delegate the jaimie. The neddy is unbloody. The neddy is philatelic. The neddy retract the jaimie. The jaimie towel the loella. The jaimie delegate the loella. The jaimie is retractile. The jaimie does not visit the loella. The jaimie retract the neddy. If someone delegate the neddy then they are unbloody. If someone towel the neddy and they do not chase the loella then they are unbloody. If the neddy delegate the jaimie and the jaimie is unbloody then the neddy is retractile. If someone delegate the neddy then they visit the loella. If someone is philatelic then they eat the neddy. If the jaimie delegate the loella and the loella does not visit the jaimie then the loella delegate the jaimie. If the neddy retract the loella then the loella does not eat the jaimie. If someone towel the jaimie and they do not visit the neddy then the neddy is not unbloody. The loella towel the loella.", "logic": "\nnot Towel(loella, neddy)\nTowel(loella, jaimie)\nDelegate(loella, neddy)\nZionist(loella)\nHarnessed(loella)\nTowel(neddy, loella)\nTowel(neddy, jaimie)\nDelegate(neddy, jaimie)\nUnbloody(neddy)\nPhilatelic(neddy)\nRetract(neddy, jaimie)\nTowel(jaimie, loella)\nDelegate(jaimie, loella)\nRetractile(jaimie)\nnot Retract(jaimie, loella)\nRetract(jaimie, neddy)\nforall x (Delegate(x, neddy) -> Unbloody(x))\nforall x (Towel(x, neddy) and not Towel(x, loella) -> Unbloody(x))\nDelegate(neddy, jaimie) and Unbloody(jaimie) -> Retractile(neddy)\nforall x (Delegate(x, neddy) -> Retract(x, loella))\nforall x (Philatelic(x) -> Delegate(x, neddy))\nDelegate(jaimie, loella) and not Retract(loella, jaimie) -> Delegate(loella, jaimie)\nRetract(neddy, loella) -> not Delegate(loella, jaimie)\nforall x (Towel(x, jaimie) and not Retract(x, neddy) -> not Unbloody(neddy))\n\nTowel(loella, loella)\n\nTowel(loella, loella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "Veronique is aestival. Dorris is contrived. Kaitlin is oaken. Nice, darkish people are connate. Red, connate people are scaphoid. If someone is contrived then they are scaphoid. If someone is scaphoid then they are aestival. If someone is connate then they are aestival. All aestival people are not darkish. If someone is connate then they are oaken. Young, darkish people are contrived. Veronique is aestival.", "logic": "\nAestival(veronique)\nContrived(dorris)\nOaken(kaitlin)\nforall x (Aestival(x) and Darkish(x) -> Connate(x))\nforall x (Weekly(x) and Connate(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Contrived(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Aestival(x))\nforall x (Connate(x) -> Aestival(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> not Darkish(x))\nforall x (Connate(x) -> Oaken(x))\nforall x (Connate(x) and Darkish(x) -> Contrived(x))\n\nAestival(veronique)\n\ntherefore Aestival(veronique)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Darian is woolly. Tracie is basal. Catrina is asterisked. Nice, burled people are muzzy. Red, muzzy people are increased. If someone is basal then they are increased. If someone is increased then they are woolly. If someone is muzzy then they are woolly. All woolly people are not burled. If someone is muzzy then they are asterisked. Young, burled people are basal. Catrina is not asterisked.", "logic": "\nWoolly(darian)\nBasal(tracie)\nAsterisked(catrina)\nforall x (Woolly(x) and Burled(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Forehand(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Increased(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Increased(x))\nforall x (Increased(x) -> Woolly(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Woolly(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> not Burled(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) and Burled(x) -> Basal(x))\n\nnot Asterisked(catrina)\n\ntherefore Asterisked(catrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Woody is strident. Stefania is brimful. Ingamar is fallow. Nice, operant people are haywire. Red, haywire people are variform. If someone is brimful then they are variform. If someone is variform then they are strident. If someone is haywire then they are strident. All strident people are not operant. If someone is haywire then they are fallow. Young, operant people are brimful. Woody is not operant.", "logic": "\nStrident(woody)\nBrimful(stefania)\nFallow(ingamar)\nforall x (Strident(x) and Operant(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Gibelike(x) and Haywire(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Brimful(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Variform(x) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) -> not Operant(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Fallow(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Operant(x) -> Brimful(x))\n\nnot Operant(woody)\n\nStrident(woody) and forall x (Strident(x) -> not Operant(x)) -> therefore not Operant(woody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Dalila is dissected. Larry is myriad. Frederick is abortive. Nice, assentient people are astounding. Red, astounding people are diestrual. If someone is myriad then they are diestrual. If someone is diestrual then they are dissected. If someone is astounding then they are dissected. All dissected people are not assentient. If someone is astounding then they are abortive. Young, assentient people are myriad. Dalila is assentient.", "logic": "\nDissected(dalila)\nMyriad(larry)\nAbortive(frederick)\nforall x (Dissected(x) and Assentient(x) -> Astounding(x))\nforall x (Horary(x) and Astounding(x) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Myriad(x) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Diestrual(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Dissected(x) -> not Assentient(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> Abortive(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) and Assentient(x) -> Myriad(x))\n\nAssentient(dalila)\n\nDissected(dalila) and forall x (Dissected(x) -> not Assentient(x)) -> therefore not Assentient(dalila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Elke is topnotch. William is telling. Tamas is kafkaesque. Nice, aquiline people are albuminous. Red, albuminous people are tiddly. If someone is telling then they are tiddly. If someone is tiddly then they are topnotch. If someone is albuminous then they are topnotch. All topnotch people are not aquiline. If someone is albuminous then they are kafkaesque. Young, aquiline people are telling. William is topnotch.", "logic": "\nTopnotch(elke)\nTelling(william)\nKafkaesque(tamas)\nforall x (Topnotch(x) and Aquiline(x) -> Albuminous(x))\nforall x (Bragging(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Telling(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Tiddly(x) -> Topnotch(x))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) -> Topnotch(x))\nforall x (Topnotch(x) -> not Aquiline(x))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) and Aquiline(x) -> Telling(x))\n\nTopnotch(william)\n\nTelling(william) and forall x (Telling(x) -> Tiddly(x)) -> therefore Tiddly(william) Tiddly(william) and forall x (Tiddly(x) -> Topnotch(x)) -> therefore Topnotch(william)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Tasha is gamy. Gearard is mortifying. Kirbie is tyrolean. Nice, unstained people are mustached. Red, mustached people are prefatory. If someone is mortifying then they are prefatory. If someone is prefatory then they are gamy. If someone is mustached then they are gamy. All gamy people are not unstained. If someone is mustached then they are tyrolean. Young, unstained people are mortifying. Gearard is not gamy.", "logic": "\nGamy(tasha)\nMortifying(gearard)\nTyrolean(kirbie)\nforall x (Gamy(x) and Unstained(x) -> Mustached(x))\nforall x (Tiny(x) and Mustached(x) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Mortifying(x) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Prefatory(x) -> Gamy(x))\nforall x (Mustached(x) -> Gamy(x))\nforall x (Gamy(x) -> not Unstained(x))\nforall x (Mustached(x) -> Tyrolean(x))\nforall x (Mustached(x) and Unstained(x) -> Mortifying(x))\n\nnot Gamy(gearard)\n\nMortifying(gearard) and forall x (Mortifying(x) -> Prefatory(x)) -> therefore Prefatory(gearard) Prefatory(gearard) and forall x (Prefatory(x) -> Gamy(x)) -> therefore Gamy(gearard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Lurleen is gruelling. Jonas is jittering. Norma is exalting. Nice, unstarred people are homologic. Red, homologic people are alienating. If someone is jittering then they are alienating. If someone is alienating then they are gruelling. If someone is homologic then they are gruelling. All gruelling people are not unstarred. If someone is homologic then they are exalting. Young, unstarred people are jittering. Jonas is not unstarred.", "logic": "\nGruelling(lurleen)\nJittering(jonas)\nExalting(norma)\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and Unstarred(x) -> Homologic(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) and Homologic(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Jittering(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) -> Gruelling(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Gruelling(x))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) -> not Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) and Unstarred(x) -> Jittering(x))\n\nnot Unstarred(jonas)\n\nJittering(jonas) and forall x (Jittering(x) -> Alienating(x)) -> therefore Alienating(jonas) Alienating(jonas) and forall x (Alienating(x) -> Gruelling(x)) -> therefore Gruelling(jonas) Gruelling(jonas) and forall x (Gruelling(x) -> not Unstarred(x)) -> therefore not Unstarred(jonas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Phillie is latin. Felipa is scant. Lilla is autacoidal. Nice, socialist people are rhombic. Red, rhombic people are cuspated. If someone is scant then they are cuspated. If someone is cuspated then they are latin. If someone is rhombic then they are latin. All latin people are not socialist. If someone is rhombic then they are autacoidal. Young, socialist people are scant. Felipa is socialist.", "logic": "\nLatin(phillie)\nScant(felipa)\nAutacoidal(lilla)\nforall x (Latin(x) and Socialist(x) -> Rhombic(x))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and Rhombic(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Scant(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Cuspated(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Rhombic(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) -> not Socialist(x))\nforall x (Rhombic(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\nforall x (Rhombic(x) and Socialist(x) -> Scant(x))\n\nSocialist(felipa)\n\nScant(felipa) and forall x (Scant(x) -> Cuspated(x)) -> therefore Cuspated(felipa) Cuspated(felipa) and forall x (Cuspated(x) -> Latin(x)) -> therefore Latin(felipa) Latin(felipa) and forall x (Latin(x) -> not Socialist(x)) -> therefore not Socialist(felipa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Enrico is plumate. Carmine is untenable. Wilona is notched. Nice, impetuous people are cxlv. Red, cxlv people are newsy. If someone is untenable then they are newsy. If someone is newsy then they are plumate. If someone is cxlv then they are plumate. All plumate people are not impetuous. If someone is cxlv then they are notched. Young, impetuous people are untenable. Wilona is not newsy.", "logic": "\nPlumate(enrico)\nUntenable(carmine)\nNotched(wilona)\nforall x (Plumate(x) and Impetuous(x) -> Cxlv(x))\nforall x (Benign(x) and Cxlv(x) -> Newsy(x))\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> Newsy(x))\nforall x (Newsy(x) -> Plumate(x))\nforall x (Cxlv(x) -> Plumate(x))\nforall x (Plumate(x) -> not Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Cxlv(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Cxlv(x) and Impetuous(x) -> Untenable(x))\n\nnot Newsy(wilona)\n\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> Newsy(x)) <- forall x (Cxlv(x) and Impetuous(x) -> Untenable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Darth is hyperbolic. Roseanne is imaginary. Harmonie is crooked. Nice, vulcanized people are veritable. Red, veritable people are ismaili. If someone is imaginary then they are ismaili. If someone is ismaili then they are hyperbolic. If someone is veritable then they are hyperbolic. All hyperbolic people are not vulcanized. If someone is veritable then they are crooked. Young, vulcanized people are imaginary. Darth is crooked.", "logic": "\nHyperbolic(darth)\nImaginary(roseanne)\nCrooked(harmonie)\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) and Vulcanized(x) -> Veritable(x))\nforall x (Integrated(x) and Veritable(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nforall x (Imaginary(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nforall x (Ismaili(x) -> Hyperbolic(x))\nforall x (Veritable(x) -> Hyperbolic(x))\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) -> not Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Veritable(x) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Veritable(x) and Vulcanized(x) -> Imaginary(x))\n\nCrooked(darth)\n\nforall x (Veritable(x) -> Crooked(x)) <- forall x (Hyperbolic(x) and Vulcanized(x) -> Veritable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Wallis is petallike. Linda is buff. Bertrand is covalent. Nice, unlined people are clawed. Red, clawed people are sardinian. If someone is buff then they are sardinian. If someone is sardinian then they are petallike. If someone is clawed then they are petallike. All petallike people are not unlined. If someone is clawed then they are covalent. Young, unlined people are buff. Wallis is not buff.", "logic": "\nPetallike(wallis)\nBuff(linda)\nCovalent(bertrand)\nforall x (Petallike(x) and Unlined(x) -> Clawed(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) and Clawed(x) -> Sardinian(x))\nforall x (Buff(x) -> Sardinian(x))\nforall x (Sardinian(x) -> Petallike(x))\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Petallike(x))\nforall x (Petallike(x) -> not Unlined(x))\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Covalent(x))\nforall x (Clawed(x) and Unlined(x) -> Buff(x))\n\nnot Buff(wallis)\n\nforall x (Clawed(x) and Unlined(x) -> Buff(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Stefania is unfailing. Abe is unending. Torre is unvaned. Nice, unhealed people are seeing. Red, seeing people are amnesic. If someone is unending then they are amnesic. If someone is amnesic then they are unfailing. If someone is seeing then they are unfailing. All unfailing people are not unhealed. If someone is seeing then they are unvaned. Young, unhealed people are unending. Stefania is seeing.", "logic": "\nUnfailing(stefania)\nUnending(abe)\nUnvaned(torre)\nforall x (Unfailing(x) and Unhealed(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Ironed(x) and Seeing(x) -> Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Unending(x) -> Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) -> not Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Unvaned(x))\nforall x (Seeing(x) and Unhealed(x) -> Unending(x))\n\nSeeing(stefania)\n\nforall x (Unfailing(x) and Unhealed(x) -> Seeing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Margret is spectral. Dotty is throbbing. Umberto is ingrown. Nice, ptolemaic people are deserted. Red, deserted people are fiscal. If someone is throbbing then they are fiscal. If someone is fiscal then they are spectral. If someone is deserted then they are spectral. All spectral people are not ptolemaic. If someone is deserted then they are ingrown. Young, ptolemaic people are throbbing. Margret is not starred.", "logic": "\nSpectral(margret)\nThrobbing(dotty)\nIngrown(umberto)\nforall x (Spectral(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Deserted(x))\nforall x (Starred(x) and Deserted(x) -> Fiscal(x))\nforall x (Throbbing(x) -> Fiscal(x))\nforall x (Fiscal(x) -> Spectral(x))\nforall x (Deserted(x) -> Spectral(x))\nforall x (Spectral(x) -> not Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Deserted(x) -> Ingrown(x))\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Throbbing(x))\n\nnot Starred(margret)\n\nnot Starred(margret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Madge is lienal. Geri is leathery. Giacinta is wheezy. Nice, loathsome people are gallant. Red, gallant people are tetragonal. If someone is leathery then they are tetragonal. If someone is tetragonal then they are lienal. If someone is gallant then they are lienal. All lienal people are not loathsome. If someone is gallant then they are wheezy. Young, loathsome people are leathery. Geri is straggling.", "logic": "\nLienal(madge)\nLeathery(geri)\nWheezy(giacinta)\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Loathsome(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Straggling(x) and Gallant(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Leathery(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> not Loathsome(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Loathsome(x) -> Leathery(x))\n\nStraggling(geri)\n\nStraggling(geri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Minni is tinselly. Didi is succinic. Heide is toupeed. Nice, special people are enfeebling. Red, enfeebling people are politic. If someone is succinic then they are politic. If someone is politic then they are tinselly. If someone is enfeebling then they are tinselly. All tinselly people are not special. If someone is enfeebling then they are toupeed. Young, special people are succinic. Heide is not best.", "logic": "\nTinselly(minni)\nSuccinic(didi)\nToupeed(heide)\nforall x (Tinselly(x) and Special(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Best(x) and Enfeebling(x) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Succinic(x) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Politic(x) -> Tinselly(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) -> Tinselly(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> not Special(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) and Special(x) -> Succinic(x))\n\nnot Best(heide)\n\nnot Best(heide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Alta is telltale. Sybila is inviolate. Jeromy is antheral. Nice, gainly people are fluffy. Red, fluffy people are irregular. If someone is inviolate then they are irregular. If someone is irregular then they are telltale. If someone is fluffy then they are telltale. All telltale people are not gainly. If someone is fluffy then they are antheral. Young, gainly people are inviolate. Jeromy is gainly.", "logic": "\nTelltale(alta)\nInviolate(sybila)\nAntheral(jeromy)\nforall x (Telltale(x) and Gainly(x) -> Fluffy(x))\nforall x (Opposite(x) and Fluffy(x) -> Irregular(x))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) -> Irregular(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) -> Telltale(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) -> Telltale(x))\nforall x (Telltale(x) -> not Gainly(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) and Gainly(x) -> Inviolate(x))\n\nGainly(jeromy)\n\nGainly(jeromy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Dorolisa is appetitive. Dorolisa is columned. Dorolisa is chesty. Kanya is not appetitive. Kanya is bearish. Kanya is chesty. Kanya is fictile. Deeanne is columned. Deeanne is fictile. Harvey is fictile. If Kanya is appetitive then Kanya is not chesty. All fictile people are penciled. Smart, fictile people are awed. Green people are fictile. If Kanya is appetitive and Kanya is awed then Kanya is columned. Cold people are columned. Dorolisa is chesty.", "logic": "\nAppetitive(dorolisa)\nColumned(dorolisa)\nChesty(dorolisa)\nnot Appetitive(kanya)\nBearish(kanya)\nChesty(kanya)\nFictile(kanya)\nColumned(deeanne)\nFictile(deeanne)\nFictile(harvey)\nAppetitive(kanya) -> not Chesty(kanya)\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Penciled(x))\nforall x (Columned(x) and Fictile(x) -> Awed(x))\nforall x (Appetitive(x) -> Fictile(x))\nAppetitive(kanya) and Awed(kanya) -> Columned(kanya)\nforall x (Penciled(x) -> Columned(x))\n\nChesty(dorolisa)\n\ntherefore Chesty(dorolisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Rubetta is hideous. Rubetta is contrabass. Rubetta is scholastic. Chiarra is not hideous. Chiarra is nepali. Chiarra is scholastic. Chiarra is eruptive. Sly is contrabass. Sly is eruptive. Mirelle is eruptive. If Chiarra is hideous then Chiarra is not scholastic. All eruptive people are upstair. Smart, eruptive people are swanky. Green people are eruptive. If Chiarra is hideous and Chiarra is swanky then Chiarra is contrabass. Cold people are contrabass. Rubetta is not hideous.", "logic": "\nHideous(rubetta)\nContrabass(rubetta)\nScholastic(rubetta)\nnot Hideous(chiarra)\nNepali(chiarra)\nScholastic(chiarra)\nEruptive(chiarra)\nContrabass(sly)\nEruptive(sly)\nEruptive(mirelle)\nHideous(chiarra) -> not Scholastic(chiarra)\nforall x (Eruptive(x) -> Upstair(x))\nforall x (Contrabass(x) and Eruptive(x) -> Swanky(x))\nforall x (Hideous(x) -> Eruptive(x))\nHideous(chiarra) and Swanky(chiarra) -> Contrabass(chiarra)\nforall x (Upstair(x) -> Contrabass(x))\n\nnot Hideous(rubetta)\n\ntherefore Hideous(rubetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Garp is galilaean. Garp is ciliate. Garp is isoclinal. Mona is not galilaean. Mona is redux. Mona is isoclinal. Mona is chummy. Gloriane is ciliate. Gloriane is chummy. Gerianne is chummy. If Mona is galilaean then Mona is not isoclinal. All chummy people are latin. Smart, chummy people are eventful. Green people are chummy. If Mona is galilaean and Mona is eventful then Mona is ciliate. Cold people are ciliate. Gerianne is latin.", "logic": "\nGalilaean(garp)\nCiliate(garp)\nIsoclinal(garp)\nnot Galilaean(mona)\nRedux(mona)\nIsoclinal(mona)\nChummy(mona)\nCiliate(gloriane)\nChummy(gloriane)\nChummy(gerianne)\nGalilaean(mona) -> not Isoclinal(mona)\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Ciliate(x) and Chummy(x) -> Eventful(x))\nforall x (Galilaean(x) -> Chummy(x))\nGalilaean(mona) and Eventful(mona) -> Ciliate(mona)\nforall x (Latin(x) -> Ciliate(x))\n\nLatin(gerianne)\n\nChummy(gerianne) and forall x (Chummy(x) -> Latin(x)) -> therefore Latin(gerianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Morten is barytic. Morten is mucoidal. Morten is catoptric. Clarice is not barytic. Clarice is antheral. Clarice is catoptric. Clarice is brimming. Hermina is mucoidal. Hermina is brimming. Maris is brimming. If Clarice is barytic then Clarice is not catoptric. All brimming people are functional. Smart, brimming people are briery. Green people are brimming. If Clarice is barytic and Clarice is briery then Clarice is mucoidal. Cold people are mucoidal. Morten is not brimming.", "logic": "\nBarytic(morten)\nMucoidal(morten)\nCatoptric(morten)\nnot Barytic(clarice)\nAntheral(clarice)\nCatoptric(clarice)\nBrimming(clarice)\nMucoidal(hermina)\nBrimming(hermina)\nBrimming(maris)\nBarytic(clarice) -> not Catoptric(clarice)\nforall x (Brimming(x) -> Functional(x))\nforall x (Mucoidal(x) and Brimming(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Barytic(x) -> Brimming(x))\nBarytic(clarice) and Briery(clarice) -> Mucoidal(clarice)\nforall x (Functional(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\n\nnot Brimming(morten)\n\nBarytic(morten) and forall x (Barytic(x) -> Brimming(x)) -> therefore Brimming(morten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Linnet is coincident. Linnet is bobtail. Linnet is concluding. Lora is not coincident. Lora is activist. Lora is concluding. Lora is downstair. Gizela is bobtail. Gizela is downstair. Christa is downstair. If Lora is coincident then Lora is not concluding. All downstair people are servile. Smart, downstair people are vulcanized. Green people are downstair. If Lora is coincident and Lora is vulcanized then Lora is bobtail. Cold people are bobtail. Lora is bobtail.", "logic": "\nCoincident(linnet)\nBobtail(linnet)\nConcluding(linnet)\nnot Coincident(lora)\nActivist(lora)\nConcluding(lora)\nDownstair(lora)\nBobtail(gizela)\nDownstair(gizela)\nDownstair(christa)\nCoincident(lora) -> not Concluding(lora)\nforall x (Downstair(x) -> Servile(x))\nforall x (Bobtail(x) and Downstair(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Coincident(x) -> Downstair(x))\nCoincident(lora) and Vulcanized(lora) -> Bobtail(lora)\nforall x (Servile(x) -> Bobtail(x))\n\nBobtail(lora)\n\nDownstair(lora) and forall x (Downstair(x) -> Servile(x)) -> therefore Servile(lora) Servile(lora) and forall x (Servile(x) -> Bobtail(x)) -> therefore Bobtail(lora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Debby is asocial. Debby is untenable. Debby is vociferous. Elisabeth is not asocial. Elisabeth is tender. Elisabeth is vociferous. Elisabeth is unnotched. Florian is untenable. Florian is unnotched. Marven is unnotched. If Elisabeth is asocial then Elisabeth is not vociferous. All unnotched people are charmed. Smart, unnotched people are thalassic. Green people are unnotched. If Elisabeth is asocial and Elisabeth is thalassic then Elisabeth is untenable. Cold people are untenable. Marven is not untenable.", "logic": "\nAsocial(debby)\nUntenable(debby)\nVociferous(debby)\nnot Asocial(elisabeth)\nTender(elisabeth)\nVociferous(elisabeth)\nUnnotched(elisabeth)\nUntenable(florian)\nUnnotched(florian)\nUnnotched(marven)\nAsocial(elisabeth) -> not Vociferous(elisabeth)\nforall x (Unnotched(x) -> Charmed(x))\nforall x (Untenable(x) and Unnotched(x) -> Thalassic(x))\nforall x (Asocial(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nAsocial(elisabeth) and Thalassic(elisabeth) -> Untenable(elisabeth)\nforall x (Charmed(x) -> Untenable(x))\n\nnot Untenable(marven)\n\nUnnotched(marven) and forall x (Unnotched(x) -> Charmed(x)) -> therefore Charmed(marven) Charmed(marven) and forall x (Charmed(x) -> Untenable(x)) -> therefore Untenable(marven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Wendell is nonthermal. Wendell is scythian. Wendell is sluicing. Mehetabel is not nonthermal. Mehetabel is gallican. Mehetabel is sluicing. Mehetabel is macho. Aldus is scythian. Aldus is macho. Babara is macho. If Mehetabel is nonthermal then Mehetabel is not sluicing. All macho people are uncreative. Smart, macho people are andalusian. Green people are macho. If Mehetabel is nonthermal and Mehetabel is andalusian then Mehetabel is scythian. Cold people are scythian. Babara is andalusian.", "logic": "\nNonthermal(wendell)\nScythian(wendell)\nSluicing(wendell)\nnot Nonthermal(mehetabel)\nGallican(mehetabel)\nSluicing(mehetabel)\nMacho(mehetabel)\nScythian(aldus)\nMacho(aldus)\nMacho(babara)\nNonthermal(mehetabel) -> not Sluicing(mehetabel)\nforall x (Macho(x) -> Uncreative(x))\nforall x (Scythian(x) and Macho(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Nonthermal(x) -> Macho(x))\nNonthermal(mehetabel) and Andalusian(mehetabel) -> Scythian(mehetabel)\nforall x (Uncreative(x) -> Scythian(x))\n\nAndalusian(babara)\n\nMacho(babara) and forall x (Macho(x) -> Uncreative(x)) -> therefore Uncreative(babara) Uncreative(babara) and forall x (Uncreative(x) -> Scythian(x)) -> therefore Scythian(babara) Scythian(babara) and Macho(babara) and forall x (Scythian(x) and Macho(x) -> Andalusian(x)) -> therefore Andalusian(babara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Malinda is infertile. Malinda is aspherical. Malinda is lurid. Winslow is not infertile. Winslow is foggy. Winslow is lurid. Winslow is elemental. Rodi is aspherical. Rodi is elemental. Doretta is elemental. If Winslow is infertile then Winslow is not lurid. All elemental people are halcyon. Smart, elemental people are sinless. Green people are elemental. If Winslow is infertile and Winslow is sinless then Winslow is aspherical. Cold people are aspherical. Doretta is not sinless.", "logic": "\nInfertile(malinda)\nAspherical(malinda)\nLurid(malinda)\nnot Infertile(winslow)\nFoggy(winslow)\nLurid(winslow)\nElemental(winslow)\nAspherical(rodi)\nElemental(rodi)\nElemental(doretta)\nInfertile(winslow) -> not Lurid(winslow)\nforall x (Elemental(x) -> Halcyon(x))\nforall x (Aspherical(x) and Elemental(x) -> Sinless(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) -> Elemental(x))\nInfertile(winslow) and Sinless(winslow) -> Aspherical(winslow)\nforall x (Halcyon(x) -> Aspherical(x))\n\nnot Sinless(doretta)\n\nElemental(doretta) and forall x (Elemental(x) -> Halcyon(x)) -> therefore Halcyon(doretta) Halcyon(doretta) and forall x (Halcyon(x) -> Aspherical(x)) -> therefore Aspherical(doretta) Aspherical(doretta) and Elemental(doretta) and forall x (Aspherical(x) and Elemental(x) -> Sinless(x)) -> therefore Sinless(doretta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Rozanne is tearing. Rozanne is watered. Rozanne is piebald. Mara is not tearing. Mara is craved. Mara is piebald. Mara is sanitary. Hali is watered. Hali is sanitary. Rudolfo is sanitary. If Mara is tearing then Mara is not piebald. All sanitary people are admissive. Smart, sanitary people are unitarian. Green people are sanitary. If Mara is tearing and Mara is unitarian then Mara is watered. Cold people are watered. Rudolfo is not piebald.", "logic": "\nTearing(rozanne)\nWatered(rozanne)\nPiebald(rozanne)\nnot Tearing(mara)\nCraved(mara)\nPiebald(mara)\nSanitary(mara)\nWatered(hali)\nSanitary(hali)\nSanitary(rudolfo)\nTearing(mara) -> not Piebald(mara)\nforall x (Sanitary(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) and Sanitary(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Tearing(x) -> Sanitary(x))\nTearing(mara) and Unitarian(mara) -> Watered(mara)\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Watered(x))\n\nnot Piebald(rudolfo)\n\nnot Piebald(rudolfo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Hartwell is corrigible. Hartwell is octal. Hartwell is allylic. Dewitt is not corrigible. Dewitt is unsolvable. Dewitt is allylic. Dewitt is brummagem. Olivette is octal. Olivette is brummagem. Jobi is brummagem. If Dewitt is corrigible then Dewitt is not allylic. All brummagem people are broadband. Smart, brummagem people are calcic. Green people are brummagem. If Dewitt is corrigible and Dewitt is calcic then Dewitt is octal. Cold people are octal. Olivette is allylic.", "logic": "\nCorrigible(hartwell)\nOctal(hartwell)\nAllylic(hartwell)\nnot Corrigible(dewitt)\nUnsolvable(dewitt)\nAllylic(dewitt)\nBrummagem(dewitt)\nOctal(olivette)\nBrummagem(olivette)\nBrummagem(jobi)\nCorrigible(dewitt) -> not Allylic(dewitt)\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Broadband(x))\nforall x (Octal(x) and Brummagem(x) -> Calcic(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) -> Brummagem(x))\nCorrigible(dewitt) and Calcic(dewitt) -> Octal(dewitt)\nforall x (Broadband(x) -> Octal(x))\n\nAllylic(olivette)\n\nAllylic(olivette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Murdoch is salvific. Murdoch is hornless. Murdoch is himalayan. Oliy is not salvific. Oliy is infrared. Oliy is himalayan. Oliy is required. Modesty is hornless. Modesty is required. Lydie is required. If Oliy is salvific then Oliy is not himalayan. All required people are waste. Smart, required people are mastered. Green people are required. If Oliy is salvific and Oliy is mastered then Oliy is hornless. Cold people are hornless. Modesty is not salvific.", "logic": "\nSalvific(murdoch)\nHornless(murdoch)\nHimalayan(murdoch)\nnot Salvific(oliy)\nInfrared(oliy)\nHimalayan(oliy)\nRequired(oliy)\nHornless(modesty)\nRequired(modesty)\nRequired(lydie)\nSalvific(oliy) -> not Himalayan(oliy)\nforall x (Required(x) -> Waste(x))\nforall x (Hornless(x) and Required(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Salvific(x) -> Required(x))\nSalvific(oliy) and Mastered(oliy) -> Hornless(oliy)\nforall x (Waste(x) -> Hornless(x))\n\nnot Salvific(modesty)\n\nnot Salvific(modesty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Mireielle is whitened. Mireielle is scorbutic. Mireielle is conventual. Corrianne is not whitened. Corrianne is restrained. Corrianne is conventual. Corrianne is ciliary. Susanna is scorbutic. Susanna is ciliary. Charo is ciliary. If Corrianne is whitened then Corrianne is not conventual. All ciliary people are benighted. Smart, ciliary people are deceitful. Green people are ciliary. If Corrianne is whitened and Corrianne is deceitful then Corrianne is scorbutic. Cold people are scorbutic. Charo is whitened.", "logic": "\nWhitened(mireielle)\nScorbutic(mireielle)\nConventual(mireielle)\nnot Whitened(corrianne)\nRestrained(corrianne)\nConventual(corrianne)\nCiliary(corrianne)\nScorbutic(susanna)\nCiliary(susanna)\nCiliary(charo)\nWhitened(corrianne) -> not Conventual(corrianne)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) -> Benighted(x))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) and Ciliary(x) -> Deceitful(x))\nforall x (Whitened(x) -> Ciliary(x))\nWhitened(corrianne) and Deceitful(corrianne) -> Scorbutic(corrianne)\nforall x (Benighted(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\n\nWhitened(charo)\n\nWhitened(charo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Flore is bated. Flore is latin. Flore is enveloping. Carlota is not bated. Carlota is bootleg. Carlota is enveloping. Carlota is lxxiv. Avis is latin. Avis is lxxiv. Ryan is lxxiv. If Carlota is bated then Carlota is not enveloping. All lxxiv people are absorbed. Smart, lxxiv people are custodial. Green people are lxxiv. If Carlota is bated and Carlota is custodial then Carlota is latin. Cold people are latin. Ryan is not bootleg.", "logic": "\nBated(flore)\nLatin(flore)\nEnveloping(flore)\nnot Bated(carlota)\nBootleg(carlota)\nEnveloping(carlota)\nLxxiv(carlota)\nLatin(avis)\nLxxiv(avis)\nLxxiv(ryan)\nBated(carlota) -> not Enveloping(carlota)\nforall x (Lxxiv(x) -> Absorbed(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) and Lxxiv(x) -> Custodial(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Lxxiv(x))\nBated(carlota) and Custodial(carlota) -> Latin(carlota)\nforall x (Absorbed(x) -> Latin(x))\n\nnot Bootleg(ryan)\n\nnot Bootleg(ryan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Terese is aeschylean. Terese is woven. Terese is echoless. Wheeler is not aeschylean. Wheeler is narcotised. Wheeler is echoless. Wheeler is bantam. Brunella is woven. Brunella is bantam. Rodrique is bantam. If Wheeler is aeschylean then Wheeler is not echoless. All bantam people are benign. Smart, bantam people are partizan. Green people are bantam. If Wheeler is aeschylean and Wheeler is partizan then Wheeler is woven. Cold people are woven. Terese is narcotised.", "logic": "\nAeschylean(terese)\nWoven(terese)\nEcholess(terese)\nnot Aeschylean(wheeler)\nNarcotised(wheeler)\nEcholess(wheeler)\nBantam(wheeler)\nWoven(brunella)\nBantam(brunella)\nBantam(rodrique)\nAeschylean(wheeler) -> not Echoless(wheeler)\nforall x (Bantam(x) -> Benign(x))\nforall x (Woven(x) and Bantam(x) -> Partizan(x))\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) -> Bantam(x))\nAeschylean(wheeler) and Partizan(wheeler) -> Woven(wheeler)\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Woven(x))\n\nNarcotised(terese)\n\nNarcotised(terese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Wilton is untended. Wilton is legendary. Wilton is anorthic. Dodie is celtic. Dodie is clothed. Skipp is salable. Skipp is anorthic. If someone is untended and legendary then they are celtic. If someone is celtic and unexcused then they are clothed. All anorthic, celtic people are unexcused. Wilton is anorthic.", "logic": "\nUntended(wilton)\nLegendary(wilton)\nAnorthic(wilton)\nCeltic(dodie)\nClothed(dodie)\nSalable(skipp)\nAnorthic(skipp)\nforall x (Untended(x) and Legendary(x) -> Celtic(x))\nforall x (Celtic(x) and Unexcused(x) -> Clothed(x))\nforall x (Anorthic(x) and Celtic(x) -> Unexcused(x))\n\nAnorthic(wilton)\n\ntherefore Anorthic(wilton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Alisun is womanlike. Alisun is barefaced. Alisun is incursive. Clari is oily. Clari is plumed. Jeanine is vapourous. Jeanine is incursive. If someone is womanlike and barefaced then they are oily. If someone is oily and marbled then they are plumed. All incursive, oily people are marbled. Clari is not oily.", "logic": "\nWomanlike(alisun)\nBarefaced(alisun)\nIncursive(alisun)\nOily(clari)\nPlumed(clari)\nVapourous(jeanine)\nIncursive(jeanine)\nforall x (Womanlike(x) and Barefaced(x) -> Oily(x))\nforall x (Oily(x) and Marbled(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Incursive(x) and Oily(x) -> Marbled(x))\n\nnot Oily(clari)\n\ntherefore Oily(clari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Adelice is planted. Adelice is nonexempt. Adelice is unschooled. Israel is fanned. Israel is yogistic. Xylina is sobering. Xylina is unschooled. If someone is planted and nonexempt then they are fanned. If someone is fanned and depletable then they are yogistic. All unschooled, fanned people are depletable. Adelice is fanned.", "logic": "\nPlanted(adelice)\nNonexempt(adelice)\nUnschooled(adelice)\nFanned(israel)\nYogistic(israel)\nSobering(xylina)\nUnschooled(xylina)\nforall x (Planted(x) and Nonexempt(x) -> Fanned(x))\nforall x (Fanned(x) and Depletable(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Unschooled(x) and Fanned(x) -> Depletable(x))\n\nFanned(adelice)\n\nPlanted(adelice) and Nonexempt(adelice) and forall x (Planted(x) and Nonexempt(x) -> Fanned(x)) -> therefore Fanned(adelice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Florenza is xxvii. Florenza is nutrient. Florenza is violated. Libbey is upcurved. Libbey is ataraxic. Chloe is antimonial. Chloe is violated. If someone is xxvii and nutrient then they are upcurved. If someone is upcurved and relevant then they are ataraxic. All violated, upcurved people are relevant. Florenza is not upcurved.", "logic": "\nXxvii(florenza)\nNutrient(florenza)\nViolated(florenza)\nUpcurved(libbey)\nAtaraxic(libbey)\nAntimonial(chloe)\nViolated(chloe)\nforall x (Xxvii(x) and Nutrient(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Relevant(x) -> Ataraxic(x))\nforall x (Violated(x) and Upcurved(x) -> Relevant(x))\n\nnot Upcurved(florenza)\n\nXxvii(florenza) and Nutrient(florenza) and forall x (Xxvii(x) and Nutrient(x) -> Upcurved(x)) -> therefore Upcurved(florenza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Cabrina is barricaded. Cabrina is impenitent. Cabrina is heavenly. Dita is aldehydic. Dita is compliant. Michelle is lowborn. Michelle is heavenly. If someone is barricaded and impenitent then they are aldehydic. If someone is aldehydic and aseptic then they are compliant. All heavenly, aldehydic people are aseptic. Cabrina is aseptic.", "logic": "\nBarricaded(cabrina)\nImpenitent(cabrina)\nHeavenly(cabrina)\nAldehydic(dita)\nCompliant(dita)\nLowborn(michelle)\nHeavenly(michelle)\nforall x (Barricaded(x) and Impenitent(x) -> Aldehydic(x))\nforall x (Aldehydic(x) and Aseptic(x) -> Compliant(x))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) and Aldehydic(x) -> Aseptic(x))\n\nAseptic(cabrina)\n\nBarricaded(cabrina) and Impenitent(cabrina) and forall x (Barricaded(x) and Impenitent(x) -> Aldehydic(x)) -> therefore Aldehydic(cabrina) Heavenly(cabrina) and Aldehydic(cabrina) and forall x (Heavenly(x) and Aldehydic(x) -> Aseptic(x)) -> therefore Aseptic(cabrina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Evita is lutheran. Evita is unlucky. Evita is defending. Britni is propertied. Britni is merged. Vassily is sainted. Vassily is defending. If someone is lutheran and unlucky then they are propertied. If someone is propertied and marbleised then they are merged. All defending, propertied people are marbleised. Evita is not marbleised.", "logic": "\nLutheran(evita)\nUnlucky(evita)\nDefending(evita)\nPropertied(britni)\nMerged(britni)\nSainted(vassily)\nDefending(vassily)\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and Unlucky(x) -> Propertied(x))\nforall x (Propertied(x) and Marbleised(x) -> Merged(x))\nforall x (Defending(x) and Propertied(x) -> Marbleised(x))\n\nnot Marbleised(evita)\n\nLutheran(evita) and Unlucky(evita) and forall x (Lutheran(x) and Unlucky(x) -> Propertied(x)) -> therefore Propertied(evita) Defending(evita) and Propertied(evita) and forall x (Defending(x) and Propertied(x) -> Marbleised(x)) -> therefore Marbleised(evita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Willie is signed. Willie is uniformed. Willie is unblessed. Adorne is apotropaic. Adorne is careful. Delphinia is cuneiform. Delphinia is unblessed. If someone is signed and uniformed then they are apotropaic. If someone is apotropaic and fossilised then they are careful. All unblessed, apotropaic people are fossilised. Willie is careful.", "logic": "\nSigned(willie)\nUniformed(willie)\nUnblessed(willie)\nApotropaic(adorne)\nCareful(adorne)\nCuneiform(delphinia)\nUnblessed(delphinia)\nforall x (Signed(x) and Uniformed(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\nforall x (Apotropaic(x) and Fossilised(x) -> Careful(x))\nforall x (Unblessed(x) and Apotropaic(x) -> Fossilised(x))\n\nCareful(willie)\n\nSigned(willie) and Uniformed(willie) and forall x (Signed(x) and Uniformed(x) -> Apotropaic(x)) -> therefore Apotropaic(willie) Signed(willie) and Uniformed(willie) and forall x (Signed(x) and Uniformed(x) -> Apotropaic(x)) -> therefore Apotropaic(willie) Unblessed(willie) and Apotropaic(willie) and forall x (Unblessed(x) and Apotropaic(x) -> Fossilised(x)) -> therefore Fossilised(willie) Apotropaic(willie) and Fossilised(willie) and forall x (Apotropaic(x) and Fossilised(x) -> Careful(x)) -> therefore Careful(willie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Alvira is duple. Alvira is finical. Alvira is extricable. Vasily is dickey. Vasily is adnate. Kally is master. Kally is extricable. If someone is duple and finical then they are dickey. If someone is dickey and unfunny then they are adnate. All extricable, dickey people are unfunny. Alvira is not adnate.", "logic": "\nDuple(alvira)\nFinical(alvira)\nExtricable(alvira)\nDickey(vasily)\nAdnate(vasily)\nMaster(kally)\nExtricable(kally)\nforall x (Duple(x) and Finical(x) -> Dickey(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) and Unfunny(x) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and Dickey(x) -> Unfunny(x))\n\nnot Adnate(alvira)\n\nDuple(alvira) and Finical(alvira) and forall x (Duple(x) and Finical(x) -> Dickey(x)) -> therefore Dickey(alvira) Duple(alvira) and Finical(alvira) and forall x (Duple(x) and Finical(x) -> Dickey(x)) -> therefore Dickey(alvira) Extricable(alvira) and Dickey(alvira) and forall x (Extricable(x) and Dickey(x) -> Unfunny(x)) -> therefore Unfunny(alvira) Dickey(alvira) and Unfunny(alvira) and forall x (Dickey(x) and Unfunny(x) -> Adnate(x)) -> therefore Adnate(alvira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Dyana is seraphical. Dyana is seafaring. Dyana is miasmal. Austina is equine. Austina is lossy. Nannie is archducal. Nannie is miasmal. If someone is seraphical and seafaring then they are equine. If someone is equine and fain then they are lossy. All miasmal, equine people are fain. Nannie is not equine.", "logic": "\nSeraphical(dyana)\nSeafaring(dyana)\nMiasmal(dyana)\nEquine(austina)\nLossy(austina)\nArchducal(nannie)\nMiasmal(nannie)\nforall x (Seraphical(x) and Seafaring(x) -> Equine(x))\nforall x (Equine(x) and Fain(x) -> Lossy(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Equine(x) -> Fain(x))\n\nnot Equine(nannie)\n\nforall x (Seraphical(x) and Seafaring(x) -> Equine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Roana is texan. Roana is untoasted. Roana is deranged. Adel is illusional. Adel is submissive. Stace is wireless. Stace is deranged. If someone is texan and untoasted then they are illusional. If someone is illusional and boeotian then they are submissive. All deranged, illusional people are boeotian. Adel is boeotian.", "logic": "\nTexan(roana)\nUntoasted(roana)\nDeranged(roana)\nIllusional(adel)\nSubmissive(adel)\nWireless(stace)\nDeranged(stace)\nforall x (Texan(x) and Untoasted(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Illusional(x) and Boeotian(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Illusional(x) -> Boeotian(x))\n\nBoeotian(adel)\n\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Illusional(x) -> Boeotian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Maxy is malicious. Maxy is yearlong. Maxy is isolable. Nancie is coalescing. Nancie is gluttonous. Korrie is preclusive. Korrie is isolable. If someone is malicious and yearlong then they are coalescing. If someone is coalescing and rotatory then they are gluttonous. All isolable, coalescing people are rotatory. Korrie is not rotatory.", "logic": "\nMalicious(maxy)\nYearlong(maxy)\nIsolable(maxy)\nCoalescing(nancie)\nGluttonous(nancie)\nPreclusive(korrie)\nIsolable(korrie)\nforall x (Malicious(x) and Yearlong(x) -> Coalescing(x))\nforall x (Coalescing(x) and Rotatory(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Isolable(x) and Coalescing(x) -> Rotatory(x))\n\nnot Rotatory(korrie)\n\nforall x (Isolable(x) and Coalescing(x) -> Rotatory(x)) <- forall x (Malicious(x) and Yearlong(x) -> Coalescing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Annabela is copular. Annabela is kingly. Annabela is zodiacal. Garvin is ecstatic. Garvin is gummy. Melita is nettlesome. Melita is zodiacal. If someone is copular and kingly then they are ecstatic. If someone is ecstatic and auburn then they are gummy. All zodiacal, ecstatic people are auburn. Melita is gummy.", "logic": "\nCopular(annabela)\nKingly(annabela)\nZodiacal(annabela)\nEcstatic(garvin)\nGummy(garvin)\nNettlesome(melita)\nZodiacal(melita)\nforall x (Copular(x) and Kingly(x) -> Ecstatic(x))\nforall x (Ecstatic(x) and Auburn(x) -> Gummy(x))\nforall x (Zodiacal(x) and Ecstatic(x) -> Auburn(x))\n\nGummy(melita)\n\nforall x (Ecstatic(x) and Auburn(x) -> Gummy(x)) <- forall x (Copular(x) and Kingly(x) -> Ecstatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Frank is jeweled. Frank is consular. Frank is choleric. Bucky is papillary. Bucky is valiant. Bidget is symbolical. Bidget is choleric. If someone is jeweled and consular then they are papillary. If someone is papillary and ruandan then they are valiant. All choleric, papillary people are ruandan. Frank is not symbolical.", "logic": "\nJeweled(frank)\nConsular(frank)\nCholeric(frank)\nPapillary(bucky)\nValiant(bucky)\nSymbolical(bidget)\nCholeric(bidget)\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and Consular(x) -> Papillary(x))\nforall x (Papillary(x) and Ruandan(x) -> Valiant(x))\nforall x (Choleric(x) and Papillary(x) -> Ruandan(x))\n\nnot Symbolical(frank)\n\nnot Symbolical(frank) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Tamma is modest. Tamma is articulary. Tamma is damnatory. Kristian is pregnant. Kristian is recondite. Simonne is relevant. Simonne is damnatory. If someone is modest and articulary then they are pregnant. If someone is pregnant and undressed then they are recondite. All damnatory, pregnant people are undressed. Kristian is articulary.", "logic": "\nModest(tamma)\nArticulary(tamma)\nDamnatory(tamma)\nPregnant(kristian)\nRecondite(kristian)\nRelevant(simonne)\nDamnatory(simonne)\nforall x (Modest(x) and Articulary(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) and Undressed(x) -> Recondite(x))\nforall x (Damnatory(x) and Pregnant(x) -> Undressed(x))\n\nArticulary(kristian)\n\nArticulary(kristian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Anjanette is pneumatic. Anjanette is cannular. Anjanette is staged. Fawne is heady. Fawne is comfy. Elinore is checkered. Elinore is staged. If someone is pneumatic and cannular then they are heady. If someone is heady and treeless then they are comfy. All staged, heady people are treeless. Fawne is not staged.", "logic": "\nPneumatic(anjanette)\nCannular(anjanette)\nStaged(anjanette)\nHeady(fawne)\nComfy(fawne)\nCheckered(elinore)\nStaged(elinore)\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Cannular(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Heady(x) and Treeless(x) -> Comfy(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) and Heady(x) -> Treeless(x))\n\nnot Staged(fawne)\n\nnot Staged(fawne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Frederich is actual. Frederich is erectile. Frederich is freewill. Stevy is poached. Stevy is upstanding. Pablo is selective. Pablo is freewill. If someone is actual and erectile then they are poached. If someone is poached and clenched then they are upstanding. All freewill, poached people are clenched. Pablo is erectile.", "logic": "\nActual(frederich)\nErectile(frederich)\nFreewill(frederich)\nPoached(stevy)\nUpstanding(stevy)\nSelective(pablo)\nFreewill(pablo)\nforall x (Actual(x) and Erectile(x) -> Poached(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) and Clenched(x) -> Upstanding(x))\nforall x (Freewill(x) and Poached(x) -> Clenched(x))\n\nErectile(pablo)\n\nErectile(pablo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Vikki is brutal. Vikki is ruandan. Vikki is doctrinal. Lay is feminist. Lay is doctrinal. Lay is thermic. Britni is brutal. Britni is ruandan. Britni is feminist. Britni is doctrinal. Britni is thermic. Brandea is brutal. Brandea is patented. Brandea is feminist. Brandea is doctrinal. Brandea is thermic. All lithuanian things are patented. If something is patented then it is brutal. If something is thermic then it is lithuanian. Quiet things are thermic. White, ruandan things are patented. All patented things are brutal. Britni is doctrinal.", "logic": "\nBrutal(vikki)\nRuandan(vikki)\nDoctrinal(vikki)\nFeminist(lay)\nDoctrinal(lay)\nThermic(lay)\nBrutal(britni)\nRuandan(britni)\nFeminist(britni)\nDoctrinal(britni)\nThermic(britni)\nBrutal(brandea)\nPatented(brandea)\nFeminist(brandea)\nDoctrinal(brandea)\nThermic(brandea)\nforall x (Lithuanian(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Thermic(x) -> Lithuanian(x))\nforall x (Feminist(x) -> Thermic(x))\nforall x (Thermic(x) and Ruandan(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Brutal(x))\n\nDoctrinal(britni)\n\ntherefore Doctrinal(britni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Maggi is neuronal. Maggi is lvii. Maggi is bacchanal. Cyrillus is dreary. Cyrillus is bacchanal. Cyrillus is poky. Traci is neuronal. Traci is lvii. Traci is dreary. Traci is bacchanal. Traci is poky. Job is neuronal. Job is jiggered. Job is dreary. Job is bacchanal. Job is poky. All pareve things are jiggered. If something is jiggered then it is neuronal. If something is poky then it is pareve. Quiet things are poky. White, lvii things are jiggered. All jiggered things are neuronal. Job is not poky.", "logic": "\nNeuronal(maggi)\nLvii(maggi)\nBacchanal(maggi)\nDreary(cyrillus)\nBacchanal(cyrillus)\nPoky(cyrillus)\nNeuronal(traci)\nLvii(traci)\nDreary(traci)\nBacchanal(traci)\nPoky(traci)\nNeuronal(job)\nJiggered(job)\nDreary(job)\nBacchanal(job)\nPoky(job)\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Jiggered(x))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nforall x (Poky(x) -> Pareve(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) -> Poky(x))\nforall x (Poky(x) and Lvii(x) -> Jiggered(x))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) -> Neuronal(x))\n\nnot Poky(job)\n\ntherefore Poky(job)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Antonio is unfertile. Antonio is seagirt. Antonio is martian. Bryant is admittible. Bryant is martian. Bryant is skirting. Hedy is unfertile. Hedy is seagirt. Hedy is admittible. Hedy is martian. Hedy is skirting. Shelagh is unfertile. Shelagh is crowning. Shelagh is admittible. Shelagh is martian. Shelagh is skirting. All diminutive things are crowning. If something is crowning then it is unfertile. If something is skirting then it is diminutive. Quiet things are skirting. White, seagirt things are crowning. All crowning things are unfertile. Hedy is crowning.", "logic": "\nUnfertile(antonio)\nSeagirt(antonio)\nMartian(antonio)\nAdmittible(bryant)\nMartian(bryant)\nSkirting(bryant)\nUnfertile(hedy)\nSeagirt(hedy)\nAdmittible(hedy)\nMartian(hedy)\nSkirting(hedy)\nUnfertile(shelagh)\nCrowning(shelagh)\nAdmittible(shelagh)\nMartian(shelagh)\nSkirting(shelagh)\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Crowning(x))\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Unfertile(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) and Seagirt(x) -> Crowning(x))\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Unfertile(x))\n\nCrowning(hedy)\n\nSkirting(hedy) and Seagirt(hedy) and forall x (Skirting(x) and Seagirt(x) -> Crowning(x)) -> therefore Crowning(hedy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Florinda is agelong. Florinda is molal. Florinda is untracked. Ulrich is fordable. Ulrich is untracked. Ulrich is proud. Lorilyn is agelong. Lorilyn is molal. Lorilyn is fordable. Lorilyn is untracked. Lorilyn is proud. Avraham is agelong. Avraham is paraplegic. Avraham is fordable. Avraham is untracked. Avraham is proud. All barelegged things are paraplegic. If something is paraplegic then it is agelong. If something is proud then it is barelegged. Quiet things are proud. White, molal things are paraplegic. All paraplegic things are agelong. Avraham is not barelegged.", "logic": "\nAgelong(florinda)\nMolal(florinda)\nUntracked(florinda)\nFordable(ulrich)\nUntracked(ulrich)\nProud(ulrich)\nAgelong(lorilyn)\nMolal(lorilyn)\nFordable(lorilyn)\nUntracked(lorilyn)\nProud(lorilyn)\nAgelong(avraham)\nParaplegic(avraham)\nFordable(avraham)\nUntracked(avraham)\nProud(avraham)\nforall x (Barelegged(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) -> Agelong(x))\nforall x (Proud(x) -> Barelegged(x))\nforall x (Fordable(x) -> Proud(x))\nforall x (Proud(x) and Molal(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) -> Agelong(x))\n\nnot Barelegged(avraham)\n\nProud(avraham) and forall x (Proud(x) -> Barelegged(x)) -> therefore Barelegged(avraham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Jenn is mortgaged. Jenn is heathenish. Jenn is gibbous. Helge is outcast. Helge is gibbous. Helge is lighted. Myrilla is mortgaged. Myrilla is heathenish. Myrilla is outcast. Myrilla is gibbous. Myrilla is lighted. Paula is mortgaged. Paula is gauche. Paula is outcast. Paula is gibbous. Paula is lighted. All nettled things are gauche. If something is gauche then it is mortgaged. If something is lighted then it is nettled. Quiet things are lighted. White, heathenish things are gauche. All gauche things are mortgaged. Helge is gauche.", "logic": "\nMortgaged(jenn)\nHeathenish(jenn)\nGibbous(jenn)\nOutcast(helge)\nGibbous(helge)\nLighted(helge)\nMortgaged(myrilla)\nHeathenish(myrilla)\nOutcast(myrilla)\nGibbous(myrilla)\nLighted(myrilla)\nMortgaged(paula)\nGauche(paula)\nOutcast(paula)\nGibbous(paula)\nLighted(paula)\nforall x (Nettled(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Nettled(x))\nforall x (Outcast(x) -> Lighted(x))\nforall x (Lighted(x) and Heathenish(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\n\nGauche(helge)\n\nLighted(helge) and forall x (Lighted(x) -> Nettled(x)) -> therefore Nettled(helge) Nettled(helge) and forall x (Nettled(x) -> Gauche(x)) -> therefore Gauche(helge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Adina is curly. Adina is saddled. Adina is ethical. Linus is voluptuary. Linus is ethical. Linus is late. Ruben is curly. Ruben is saddled. Ruben is voluptuary. Ruben is ethical. Ruben is late. Ron is curly. Ron is confused. Ron is voluptuary. Ron is ethical. Ron is late. All nasal things are confused. If something is confused then it is curly. If something is late then it is nasal. Quiet things are late. White, saddled things are confused. All confused things are curly. Linus is not confused.", "logic": "\nCurly(adina)\nSaddled(adina)\nEthical(adina)\nVoluptuary(linus)\nEthical(linus)\nLate(linus)\nCurly(ruben)\nSaddled(ruben)\nVoluptuary(ruben)\nEthical(ruben)\nLate(ruben)\nCurly(ron)\nConfused(ron)\nVoluptuary(ron)\nEthical(ron)\nLate(ron)\nforall x (Nasal(x) -> Confused(x))\nforall x (Confused(x) -> Curly(x))\nforall x (Late(x) -> Nasal(x))\nforall x (Voluptuary(x) -> Late(x))\nforall x (Late(x) and Saddled(x) -> Confused(x))\nforall x (Confused(x) -> Curly(x))\n\nnot Confused(linus)\n\nLate(linus) and forall x (Late(x) -> Nasal(x)) -> therefore Nasal(linus) Nasal(linus) and forall x (Nasal(x) -> Confused(x)) -> therefore Confused(linus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Kaia is heedless. Kaia is patronized. Kaia is imploring. Aura is peripteral. Aura is imploring. Aura is meshugga. Waneta is heedless. Waneta is patronized. Waneta is peripteral. Waneta is imploring. Waneta is meshugga. Ambrosio is heedless. Ambrosio is algophobic. Ambrosio is peripteral. Ambrosio is imploring. Ambrosio is meshugga. All augean things are algophobic. If something is algophobic then it is heedless. If something is meshugga then it is augean. Quiet things are meshugga. White, patronized things are algophobic. All algophobic things are heedless. Aura is heedless.", "logic": "\nHeedless(kaia)\nPatronized(kaia)\nImploring(kaia)\nPeripteral(aura)\nImploring(aura)\nMeshugga(aura)\nHeedless(waneta)\nPatronized(waneta)\nPeripteral(waneta)\nImploring(waneta)\nMeshugga(waneta)\nHeedless(ambrosio)\nAlgophobic(ambrosio)\nPeripteral(ambrosio)\nImploring(ambrosio)\nMeshugga(ambrosio)\nforall x (Augean(x) -> Algophobic(x))\nforall x (Algophobic(x) -> Heedless(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) -> Augean(x))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) -> Meshugga(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Patronized(x) -> Algophobic(x))\nforall x (Algophobic(x) -> Heedless(x))\n\nHeedless(aura)\n\nMeshugga(aura) and forall x (Meshugga(x) -> Augean(x)) -> therefore Augean(aura) Augean(aura) and forall x (Augean(x) -> Algophobic(x)) -> therefore Algophobic(aura) Algophobic(aura) and forall x (Algophobic(x) -> Heedless(x)) -> therefore Heedless(aura)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Samuel is piggy. Samuel is inadequate. Samuel is renewing. Lillis is sellable. Lillis is renewing. Lillis is speaking. Kizzee is piggy. Kizzee is inadequate. Kizzee is sellable. Kizzee is renewing. Kizzee is speaking. Bernetta is piggy. Bernetta is papillose. Bernetta is sellable. Bernetta is renewing. Bernetta is speaking. All coronary things are papillose. If something is papillose then it is piggy. If something is speaking then it is coronary. Quiet things are speaking. White, inadequate things are papillose. All papillose things are piggy. Lillis is not piggy.", "logic": "\nPiggy(samuel)\nInadequate(samuel)\nRenewing(samuel)\nSellable(lillis)\nRenewing(lillis)\nSpeaking(lillis)\nPiggy(kizzee)\nInadequate(kizzee)\nSellable(kizzee)\nRenewing(kizzee)\nSpeaking(kizzee)\nPiggy(bernetta)\nPapillose(bernetta)\nSellable(bernetta)\nRenewing(bernetta)\nSpeaking(bernetta)\nforall x (Coronary(x) -> Papillose(x))\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Piggy(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) -> Coronary(x))\nforall x (Sellable(x) -> Speaking(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) and Inadequate(x) -> Papillose(x))\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> Piggy(x))\n\nnot Piggy(lillis)\n\nSpeaking(lillis) and forall x (Speaking(x) -> Coronary(x)) -> therefore Coronary(lillis) Coronary(lillis) and forall x (Coronary(x) -> Papillose(x)) -> therefore Papillose(lillis) Papillose(lillis) and forall x (Papillose(x) -> Piggy(x)) -> therefore Piggy(lillis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Tressa is euphonic. Tressa is balding. Tressa is unstressed. Roxanne is employable. Roxanne is unstressed. Roxanne is tegular. Lynette is euphonic. Lynette is balding. Lynette is employable. Lynette is unstressed. Lynette is tegular. Babara is euphonic. Babara is puerperal. Babara is employable. Babara is unstressed. Babara is tegular. All sourish things are puerperal. If something is puerperal then it is euphonic. If something is tegular then it is sourish. Quiet things are tegular. White, balding things are puerperal. All puerperal things are euphonic. Tressa is not sourish.", "logic": "\nEuphonic(tressa)\nBalding(tressa)\nUnstressed(tressa)\nEmployable(roxanne)\nUnstressed(roxanne)\nTegular(roxanne)\nEuphonic(lynette)\nBalding(lynette)\nEmployable(lynette)\nUnstressed(lynette)\nTegular(lynette)\nEuphonic(babara)\nPuerperal(babara)\nEmployable(babara)\nUnstressed(babara)\nTegular(babara)\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Puerperal(x) -> Euphonic(x))\nforall x (Tegular(x) -> Sourish(x))\nforall x (Employable(x) -> Tegular(x))\nforall x (Tegular(x) and Balding(x) -> Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Puerperal(x) -> Euphonic(x))\n\nnot Sourish(tressa)\n\nforall x (Tegular(x) -> Sourish(x)) <- forall x (Employable(x) -> Tegular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Carolynn is ulcerated. Carolynn is apostolic. Carolynn is fore. Barnaby is bahai. Barnaby is fore. Barnaby is unuttered. Cecil is ulcerated. Cecil is apostolic. Cecil is bahai. Cecil is fore. Cecil is unuttered. Marilin is ulcerated. Marilin is biotypic. Marilin is bahai. Marilin is fore. Marilin is unuttered. All fiberoptic things are biotypic. If something is biotypic then it is ulcerated. If something is unuttered then it is fiberoptic. Quiet things are unuttered. White, apostolic things are biotypic. All biotypic things are ulcerated. Carolynn is biotypic.", "logic": "\nUlcerated(carolynn)\nApostolic(carolynn)\nFore(carolynn)\nBahai(barnaby)\nFore(barnaby)\nUnuttered(barnaby)\nUlcerated(cecil)\nApostolic(cecil)\nBahai(cecil)\nFore(cecil)\nUnuttered(cecil)\nUlcerated(marilin)\nBiotypic(marilin)\nBahai(marilin)\nFore(marilin)\nUnuttered(marilin)\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) -> Biotypic(x))\nforall x (Biotypic(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) -> Fiberoptic(x))\nforall x (Bahai(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) and Apostolic(x) -> Biotypic(x))\nforall x (Biotypic(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\n\nBiotypic(carolynn)\n\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) -> Biotypic(x)) <- forall x (Unuttered(x) -> Fiberoptic(x)) <- forall x (Bahai(x) -> Unuttered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Shepherd is damask. Shepherd is virulent. Shepherd is ailing. Burke is champleve. Burke is ailing. Burke is genial. Leigh is damask. Leigh is virulent. Leigh is champleve. Leigh is ailing. Leigh is genial. Pincus is damask. Pincus is processed. Pincus is champleve. Pincus is ailing. Pincus is genial. All armed things are processed. If something is processed then it is damask. If something is genial then it is armed. Quiet things are genial. White, virulent things are processed. All processed things are damask. Shepherd is not genial.", "logic": "\nDamask(shepherd)\nVirulent(shepherd)\nAiling(shepherd)\nChampleve(burke)\nAiling(burke)\nGenial(burke)\nDamask(leigh)\nVirulent(leigh)\nChampleve(leigh)\nAiling(leigh)\nGenial(leigh)\nDamask(pincus)\nProcessed(pincus)\nChampleve(pincus)\nAiling(pincus)\nGenial(pincus)\nforall x (Armed(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) -> Damask(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) -> Armed(x))\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Genial(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) and Virulent(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) -> Damask(x))\n\nnot Genial(shepherd)\n\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Genial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Oral is contrived. Oral is antiblack. Oral is procumbent. Lancelot is chancrous. Lancelot is procumbent. Lancelot is spiritual. Deanne is contrived. Deanne is antiblack. Deanne is chancrous. Deanne is procumbent. Deanne is spiritual. Correy is contrived. Correy is umpteen. Correy is chancrous. Correy is procumbent. Correy is spiritual. All flip things are umpteen. If something is umpteen then it is contrived. If something is spiritual then it is flip. Quiet things are spiritual. White, antiblack things are umpteen. All umpteen things are contrived. Lancelot is antiblack.", "logic": "\nContrived(oral)\nAntiblack(oral)\nProcumbent(oral)\nChancrous(lancelot)\nProcumbent(lancelot)\nSpiritual(lancelot)\nContrived(deanne)\nAntiblack(deanne)\nChancrous(deanne)\nProcumbent(deanne)\nSpiritual(deanne)\nContrived(correy)\nUmpteen(correy)\nChancrous(correy)\nProcumbent(correy)\nSpiritual(correy)\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Contrived(x))\nforall x (Spiritual(x) -> Flip(x))\nforall x (Chancrous(x) -> Spiritual(x))\nforall x (Spiritual(x) and Antiblack(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Contrived(x))\n\nAntiblack(lancelot)\n\nAntiblack(lancelot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Evania is pictorial. Evania is spavined. Evania is true. Renell is masoretic. Renell is true. Renell is blotchy. Danila is pictorial. Danila is spavined. Danila is masoretic. Danila is true. Danila is blotchy. Dewitt is pictorial. Dewitt is compulsory. Dewitt is masoretic. Dewitt is true. Dewitt is blotchy. All occurrent things are compulsory. If something is compulsory then it is pictorial. If something is blotchy then it is occurrent. Quiet things are blotchy. White, spavined things are compulsory. All compulsory things are pictorial. Evania is not masoretic.", "logic": "\nPictorial(evania)\nSpavined(evania)\nTrue(evania)\nMasoretic(renell)\nTrue(renell)\nBlotchy(renell)\nPictorial(danila)\nSpavined(danila)\nMasoretic(danila)\nTrue(danila)\nBlotchy(danila)\nPictorial(dewitt)\nCompulsory(dewitt)\nMasoretic(dewitt)\nTrue(dewitt)\nBlotchy(dewitt)\nforall x (Occurrent(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Pictorial(x))\nforall x (Blotchy(x) -> Occurrent(x))\nforall x (Masoretic(x) -> Blotchy(x))\nforall x (Blotchy(x) and Spavined(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Pictorial(x))\n\nnot Masoretic(evania)\n\nnot Masoretic(evania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Godart is cadent. Godart is topknotted. Godart is barbarous. Marillin is reductive. Marillin is barbarous. Marillin is ornate. Thornie is cadent. Thornie is topknotted. Thornie is reductive. Thornie is barbarous. Thornie is ornate. Dafna is cadent. Dafna is hearing. Dafna is reductive. Dafna is barbarous. Dafna is ornate. All supreme things are hearing. If something is hearing then it is cadent. If something is ornate then it is supreme. Quiet things are ornate. White, topknotted things are hearing. All hearing things are cadent. Dafna is topknotted.", "logic": "\nCadent(godart)\nTopknotted(godart)\nBarbarous(godart)\nReductive(marillin)\nBarbarous(marillin)\nOrnate(marillin)\nCadent(thornie)\nTopknotted(thornie)\nReductive(thornie)\nBarbarous(thornie)\nOrnate(thornie)\nCadent(dafna)\nHearing(dafna)\nReductive(dafna)\nBarbarous(dafna)\nOrnate(dafna)\nforall x (Supreme(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) -> Cadent(x))\nforall x (Ornate(x) -> Supreme(x))\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Ornate(x))\nforall x (Ornate(x) and Topknotted(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) -> Cadent(x))\n\nTopknotted(dafna)\n\nTopknotted(dafna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Nertie is famous. Doll is sexist. Esme is awnless. If something is sexist then it is nonelected. Kind, topped things are nonelected. Nice, incan things are famous. All referent, topped things are famous. If Doll is awnless then Doll is referent. Rough things are topped. If something is nonelected then it is awnless. If something is nonelected and not incan then it is awnless. Nertie is famous.", "logic": "\nFamous(nertie)\nSexist(doll)\nAwnless(esme)\nforall x (Sexist(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) and Topped(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and Incan(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) and Topped(x) -> Famous(x))\nAwnless(doll) -> Referent(doll)\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Topped(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) -> Awnless(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and not Incan(x) -> Awnless(x))\n\nFamous(nertie)\n\ntherefore Famous(nertie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Arlo is redolent. Margit is allowable. Juliana is nonvisual. If something is allowable then it is virulent. Kind, brusk things are virulent. Nice, profuse things are redolent. All dependant, brusk things are redolent. If Margit is nonvisual then Margit is dependant. Rough things are brusk. If something is virulent then it is nonvisual. If something is virulent and not profuse then it is nonvisual. Margit is not allowable.", "logic": "\nRedolent(arlo)\nAllowable(margit)\nNonvisual(juliana)\nforall x (Allowable(x) -> Virulent(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) and Brusk(x) -> Virulent(x))\nforall x (Virulent(x) and Profuse(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) and Brusk(x) -> Redolent(x))\nNonvisual(margit) -> Dependant(margit)\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) -> Brusk(x))\nforall x (Virulent(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\nforall x (Virulent(x) and not Profuse(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\n\nnot Allowable(margit)\n\ntherefore Allowable(margit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Ross is toothsome. Ignacius is immobile. Felicdad is capitate. If something is immobile then it is bats. Kind, quelled things are bats. Nice, rhombic things are toothsome. All amaurotic, quelled things are toothsome. If Ignacius is capitate then Ignacius is amaurotic. Rough things are quelled. If something is bats then it is capitate. If something is bats and not rhombic then it is capitate. Ignacius is bats.", "logic": "\nToothsome(ross)\nImmobile(ignacius)\nCapitate(felicdad)\nforall x (Immobile(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) and Quelled(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) and Rhombic(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) and Quelled(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nCapitate(ignacius) -> Amaurotic(ignacius)\nforall x (Capitate(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) -> Capitate(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) and not Rhombic(x) -> Capitate(x))\n\nBats(ignacius)\n\nImmobile(ignacius) and forall x (Immobile(x) -> Bats(x)) -> therefore Bats(ignacius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Shea is fugitive. Bernete is diluvial. Hershel is umber. If something is diluvial then it is miserable. Kind, untaped things are miserable. Nice, heartsick things are fugitive. All encircling, untaped things are fugitive. If Bernete is umber then Bernete is encircling. Rough things are untaped. If something is miserable then it is umber. If something is miserable and not heartsick then it is umber. Hershel is not untaped.", "logic": "\nFugitive(shea)\nDiluvial(bernete)\nUmber(hershel)\nforall x (Diluvial(x) -> Miserable(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Untaped(x) -> Miserable(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) and Heartsick(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Untaped(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nUmber(bernete) -> Encircling(bernete)\nforall x (Umber(x) -> Untaped(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) -> Umber(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) and not Heartsick(x) -> Umber(x))\n\nnot Untaped(hershel)\n\nUmber(hershel) and forall x (Umber(x) -> Untaped(x)) -> therefore Untaped(hershel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Rosamond is inflamed. Tarrah is antinomian. Rutledge is cuttable. If something is antinomian then it is tireless. Kind, confirmed things are tireless. Nice, aurorean things are inflamed. All birch, confirmed things are inflamed. If Tarrah is cuttable then Tarrah is birch. Rough things are confirmed. If something is tireless then it is cuttable. If something is tireless and not aurorean then it is cuttable. Tarrah is cuttable.", "logic": "\nInflamed(rosamond)\nAntinomian(tarrah)\nCuttable(rutledge)\nforall x (Antinomian(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Birch(x) and Confirmed(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Tireless(x) and Aurorean(x) -> Inflamed(x))\nforall x (Birch(x) and Confirmed(x) -> Inflamed(x))\nCuttable(tarrah) -> Birch(tarrah)\nforall x (Cuttable(x) -> Confirmed(x))\nforall x (Tireless(x) -> Cuttable(x))\nforall x (Tireless(x) and not Aurorean(x) -> Cuttable(x))\n\nCuttable(tarrah)\n\nAntinomian(tarrah) and forall x (Antinomian(x) -> Tireless(x)) -> therefore Tireless(tarrah) Tireless(tarrah) and forall x (Tireless(x) -> Cuttable(x)) -> therefore Cuttable(tarrah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Kimbra is spoiled. Stanleigh is provoked. Noella is comic. If something is provoked then it is bicornuous. Kind, sizeable things are bicornuous. Nice, rampant things are spoiled. All pampering, sizeable things are spoiled. If Stanleigh is comic then Stanleigh is pampering. Rough things are sizeable. If something is bicornuous then it is comic. If something is bicornuous and not rampant then it is comic. Stanleigh is not comic.", "logic": "\nSpoiled(kimbra)\nProvoked(stanleigh)\nComic(noella)\nforall x (Provoked(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Pampering(x) and Sizeable(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) and Rampant(x) -> Spoiled(x))\nforall x (Pampering(x) and Sizeable(x) -> Spoiled(x))\nComic(stanleigh) -> Pampering(stanleigh)\nforall x (Comic(x) -> Sizeable(x))\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Comic(x))\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) and not Rampant(x) -> Comic(x))\n\nnot Comic(stanleigh)\n\nProvoked(stanleigh) and forall x (Provoked(x) -> Bicornuous(x)) -> therefore Bicornuous(stanleigh) Bicornuous(stanleigh) and forall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Comic(x)) -> therefore Comic(stanleigh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Demetrius is barelegged. Kalie is unconfined. Marylynne is lateral. If something is unconfined then it is benefic. Kind, vicarial things are benefic. Nice, soggy things are barelegged. All unfirm, vicarial things are barelegged. If Kalie is lateral then Kalie is unfirm. Rough things are vicarial. If something is benefic then it is lateral. If something is benefic and not soggy then it is lateral. Kalie is vicarial.", "logic": "\nBarelegged(demetrius)\nUnconfined(kalie)\nLateral(marylynne)\nforall x (Unconfined(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Vicarial(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Benefic(x) and Soggy(x) -> Barelegged(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Vicarial(x) -> Barelegged(x))\nLateral(kalie) -> Unfirm(kalie)\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Vicarial(x))\nforall x (Benefic(x) -> Lateral(x))\nforall x (Benefic(x) and not Soggy(x) -> Lateral(x))\n\nVicarial(kalie)\n\nUnconfined(kalie) and forall x (Unconfined(x) -> Benefic(x)) -> therefore Benefic(kalie) Benefic(kalie) and forall x (Benefic(x) -> Lateral(x)) -> therefore Lateral(kalie) Lateral(kalie) and forall x (Lateral(x) -> Vicarial(x)) -> therefore Vicarial(kalie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Barbabas is potted. Paddy is calico. Georg is echt. If something is calico then it is intramural. Kind, homoecious things are intramural. Nice, ovine things are potted. All insolvent, homoecious things are potted. If Paddy is echt then Paddy is insolvent. Rough things are homoecious. If something is intramural then it is echt. If something is intramural and not ovine then it is echt. Paddy is not homoecious.", "logic": "\nPotted(barbabas)\nCalico(paddy)\nEcht(georg)\nforall x (Calico(x) -> Intramural(x))\nforall x (Insolvent(x) and Homoecious(x) -> Intramural(x))\nforall x (Intramural(x) and Ovine(x) -> Potted(x))\nforall x (Insolvent(x) and Homoecious(x) -> Potted(x))\nEcht(paddy) -> Insolvent(paddy)\nforall x (Echt(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nforall x (Intramural(x) -> Echt(x))\nforall x (Intramural(x) and not Ovine(x) -> Echt(x))\n\nnot Homoecious(paddy)\n\nCalico(paddy) and forall x (Calico(x) -> Intramural(x)) -> therefore Intramural(paddy) Intramural(paddy) and forall x (Intramural(x) -> Echt(x)) -> therefore Echt(paddy) Echt(paddy) and forall x (Echt(x) -> Homoecious(x)) -> therefore Homoecious(paddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Griffith is colloquial. Olin is mormon. Charline is clawlike. If something is mormon then it is exuberant. Kind, uninitiate things are exuberant. Nice, streetwise things are colloquial. All hogged, uninitiate things are colloquial. If Olin is clawlike then Olin is hogged. Rough things are uninitiate. If something is exuberant then it is clawlike. If something is exuberant and not streetwise then it is clawlike. Griffith is not clawlike.", "logic": "\nColloquial(griffith)\nMormon(olin)\nClawlike(charline)\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Exuberant(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Exuberant(x))\nforall x (Exuberant(x) and Streetwise(x) -> Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Colloquial(x))\nClawlike(olin) -> Hogged(olin)\nforall x (Clawlike(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\nforall x (Exuberant(x) -> Clawlike(x))\nforall x (Exuberant(x) and not Streetwise(x) -> Clawlike(x))\n\nnot Clawlike(griffith)\n\nforall x (Exuberant(x) -> Clawlike(x)) <- forall x (Mormon(x) -> Exuberant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Victor is elegiac. Greg is belarusian. Laurance is burning. If something is belarusian then it is bullnecked. Kind, mormon things are bullnecked. Nice, romanist things are elegiac. All amnesic, mormon things are elegiac. If Greg is burning then Greg is amnesic. Rough things are mormon. If something is bullnecked then it is burning. If something is bullnecked and not romanist then it is burning. Victor is mormon.", "logic": "\nElegiac(victor)\nBelarusian(greg)\nBurning(laurance)\nforall x (Belarusian(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) and Mormon(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) and Romanist(x) -> Elegiac(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) and Mormon(x) -> Elegiac(x))\nBurning(greg) -> Amnesic(greg)\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Mormon(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Burning(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) and not Romanist(x) -> Burning(x))\n\nMormon(victor)\n\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Mormon(x)) <- forall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Burning(x)) <- forall x (Belarusian(x) -> Bullnecked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Hodge is adust. Ahmet is subaltern. Willis is boeotian. If something is subaltern then it is affable. Kind, vatical things are affable. Nice, euclidean things are adust. All mouthless, vatical things are adust. If Ahmet is boeotian then Ahmet is mouthless. Rough things are vatical. If something is affable then it is boeotian. If something is affable and not euclidean then it is boeotian. Willis is not affable.", "logic": "\nAdust(hodge)\nSubaltern(ahmet)\nBoeotian(willis)\nforall x (Subaltern(x) -> Affable(x))\nforall x (Mouthless(x) and Vatical(x) -> Affable(x))\nforall x (Affable(x) and Euclidean(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Mouthless(x) and Vatical(x) -> Adust(x))\nBoeotian(ahmet) -> Mouthless(ahmet)\nforall x (Boeotian(x) -> Vatical(x))\nforall x (Affable(x) -> Boeotian(x))\nforall x (Affable(x) and not Euclidean(x) -> Boeotian(x))\n\nnot Affable(willis)\n\nforall x (Subaltern(x) -> Affable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Christi is smothered. Madlin is textile. Forrest is publicised. If something is textile then it is guided. Kind, memorable things are guided. Nice, peptic things are smothered. All overblown, memorable things are smothered. If Madlin is publicised then Madlin is overblown. Rough things are memorable. If something is guided then it is publicised. If something is guided and not peptic then it is publicised. Christi is guided.", "logic": "\nSmothered(christi)\nTextile(madlin)\nPublicised(forrest)\nforall x (Textile(x) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Overblown(x) and Memorable(x) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) and Peptic(x) -> Smothered(x))\nforall x (Overblown(x) and Memorable(x) -> Smothered(x))\nPublicised(madlin) -> Overblown(madlin)\nforall x (Publicised(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Publicised(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) and not Peptic(x) -> Publicised(x))\n\nGuided(christi)\n\nforall x (Textile(x) -> Guided(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Simeon is cantabile. Edyth is enchanted. Wilona is shona. If something is enchanted then it is cockamamie. Kind, blabby things are cockamamie. Nice, outfitted things are cantabile. All mellowed, blabby things are cantabile. If Edyth is shona then Edyth is mellowed. Rough things are blabby. If something is cockamamie then it is shona. If something is cockamamie and not outfitted then it is shona. Wilona is not outfitted.", "logic": "\nCantabile(simeon)\nEnchanted(edyth)\nShona(wilona)\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Cockamamie(x))\nforall x (Mellowed(x) and Blabby(x) -> Cockamamie(x))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) and Outfitted(x) -> Cantabile(x))\nforall x (Mellowed(x) and Blabby(x) -> Cantabile(x))\nShona(edyth) -> Mellowed(edyth)\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) -> Shona(x))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) and not Outfitted(x) -> Shona(x))\n\nnot Outfitted(wilona)\n\nnot Outfitted(wilona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Tull is bottomless. Emili is sapphirine. Kerianne is pristine. If something is sapphirine then it is carpeted. Kind, spousal things are carpeted. Nice, unrenewed things are bottomless. All shattered, spousal things are bottomless. If Emili is pristine then Emili is shattered. Rough things are spousal. If something is carpeted then it is pristine. If something is carpeted and not unrenewed then it is pristine. Tull is sapphirine.", "logic": "\nBottomless(tull)\nSapphirine(emili)\nPristine(kerianne)\nforall x (Sapphirine(x) -> Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Spousal(x) -> Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) and Unrenewed(x) -> Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Spousal(x) -> Bottomless(x))\nPristine(emili) -> Shattered(emili)\nforall x (Pristine(x) -> Spousal(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Pristine(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) and not Unrenewed(x) -> Pristine(x))\n\nSapphirine(tull)\n\nSapphirine(tull) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Juliana is subocean. Carolyne is kosher. Nana is byzantine. If something is kosher then it is petalled. Kind, fathomable things are petalled. Nice, shorthand things are subocean. All aplitic, fathomable things are subocean. If Carolyne is byzantine then Carolyne is aplitic. Rough things are fathomable. If something is petalled then it is byzantine. If something is petalled and not shorthand then it is byzantine. Nana is not aplitic.", "logic": "\nSubocean(juliana)\nKosher(carolyne)\nByzantine(nana)\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Petalled(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) and Fathomable(x) -> Petalled(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Subocean(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) and Fathomable(x) -> Subocean(x))\nByzantine(carolyne) -> Aplitic(carolyne)\nforall x (Byzantine(x) -> Fathomable(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) -> Byzantine(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) and not Shorthand(x) -> Byzantine(x))\n\nnot Aplitic(nana)\n\nnot Aplitic(nana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Esma is voltaic. Torrey is sunburnt. Emylee is stern. If something is sunburnt then it is sandaled. Kind, competent things are sandaled. Nice, polydactyl things are voltaic. All xenophobic, competent things are voltaic. If Torrey is stern then Torrey is xenophobic. Rough things are competent. If something is sandaled then it is stern. If something is sandaled and not polydactyl then it is stern. Emylee is sunburnt.", "logic": "\nVoltaic(esma)\nSunburnt(torrey)\nStern(emylee)\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Sandaled(x))\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and Competent(x) -> Sandaled(x))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) and Polydactyl(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and Competent(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nStern(torrey) -> Xenophobic(torrey)\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Competent(x))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) and not Polydactyl(x) -> Stern(x))\n\nSunburnt(emylee)\n\nSunburnt(emylee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Tessa is uncleared. Tessa is numerate. Tessa is seedy. Glenda is vulpine. Glenda is unsavory. Glenda is uncleared. Glenda is not formidable. Jeannette is vulpine. Jeannette is not acetylenic. Jeannette is unsavory. Jeannette is not numerate. Jeannette is not seedy. If Jeannette is formidable then Jeannette is acetylenic. If Tessa is unsavory and Tessa is uncleared then Tessa is formidable. If something is seedy then it is unsavory. Round things are unsavory. Kind, formidable things are vulpine. If something is formidable and not unsavory then it is vulpine. Jeannette is unsavory.", "logic": "\nUncleared(tessa)\nNumerate(tessa)\nSeedy(tessa)\nVulpine(glenda)\nUnsavory(glenda)\nUncleared(glenda)\nnot Formidable(glenda)\nVulpine(jeannette)\nnot Acetylenic(jeannette)\nUnsavory(jeannette)\nnot Numerate(jeannette)\nnot Seedy(jeannette)\nFormidable(jeannette) -> Acetylenic(jeannette)\nUnsavory(tessa) and Uncleared(tessa) -> Formidable(tessa)\nforall x (Seedy(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Uncleared(x) and Formidable(x) -> Vulpine(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and not Unsavory(x) -> Vulpine(x))\n\nUnsavory(jeannette)\n\ntherefore Unsavory(jeannette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Glenine is heretical. Glenine is ignited. Glenine is copious. Jacki is comforted. Jacki is tenable. Jacki is heretical. Jacki is not shut. Spiros is comforted. Spiros is not dormie. Spiros is tenable. Spiros is not ignited. Spiros is not copious. If Spiros is shut then Spiros is dormie. If Glenine is tenable and Glenine is heretical then Glenine is shut. If something is copious then it is tenable. Round things are tenable. Kind, shut things are comforted. If something is shut and not tenable then it is comforted. Spiros is not tenable.", "logic": "\nHeretical(glenine)\nIgnited(glenine)\nCopious(glenine)\nComforted(jacki)\nTenable(jacki)\nHeretical(jacki)\nnot Shut(jacki)\nComforted(spiros)\nnot Dormie(spiros)\nTenable(spiros)\nnot Ignited(spiros)\nnot Copious(spiros)\nShut(spiros) -> Dormie(spiros)\nTenable(glenine) and Heretical(glenine) -> Shut(glenine)\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Shut(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Heretical(x) and Shut(x) -> Comforted(x))\nforall x (Shut(x) and not Tenable(x) -> Comforted(x))\n\nnot Tenable(spiros)\n\ntherefore Tenable(spiros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Elnore is undisputed. Elnore is sisterlike. Elnore is anaemic. Casper is nonhairy. Casper is solar. Casper is undisputed. Casper is not hotheaded. Micheil is nonhairy. Micheil is not abstract. Micheil is solar. Micheil is not sisterlike. Micheil is not anaemic. If Micheil is hotheaded then Micheil is abstract. If Elnore is solar and Elnore is undisputed then Elnore is hotheaded. If something is anaemic then it is solar. Round things are solar. Kind, hotheaded things are nonhairy. If something is hotheaded and not solar then it is nonhairy. Elnore is solar.", "logic": "\nUndisputed(elnore)\nSisterlike(elnore)\nAnaemic(elnore)\nNonhairy(casper)\nSolar(casper)\nUndisputed(casper)\nnot Hotheaded(casper)\nNonhairy(micheil)\nnot Abstract(micheil)\nSolar(micheil)\nnot Sisterlike(micheil)\nnot Anaemic(micheil)\nHotheaded(micheil) -> Abstract(micheil)\nSolar(elnore) and Undisputed(elnore) -> Hotheaded(elnore)\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Solar(x))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Solar(x))\nforall x (Undisputed(x) and Hotheaded(x) -> Nonhairy(x))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) and not Solar(x) -> Nonhairy(x))\n\nSolar(elnore)\n\nAnaemic(elnore) and forall x (Anaemic(x) -> Solar(x)) -> therefore Solar(elnore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Dalia is roundabout. Dalia is herculean. Dalia is spikelike. Nathan is glinting. Nathan is shuddering. Nathan is roundabout. Nathan is not weathered. Elie is glinting. Elie is not remorseful. Elie is shuddering. Elie is not herculean. Elie is not spikelike. If Elie is weathered then Elie is remorseful. If Dalia is shuddering and Dalia is roundabout then Dalia is weathered. If something is spikelike then it is shuddering. Round things are shuddering. Kind, weathered things are glinting. If something is weathered and not shuddering then it is glinting. Dalia is not shuddering.", "logic": "\nRoundabout(dalia)\nHerculean(dalia)\nSpikelike(dalia)\nGlinting(nathan)\nShuddering(nathan)\nRoundabout(nathan)\nnot Weathered(nathan)\nGlinting(elie)\nnot Remorseful(elie)\nShuddering(elie)\nnot Herculean(elie)\nnot Spikelike(elie)\nWeathered(elie) -> Remorseful(elie)\nShuddering(dalia) and Roundabout(dalia) -> Weathered(dalia)\nforall x (Spikelike(x) -> Shuddering(x))\nforall x (Weathered(x) -> Shuddering(x))\nforall x (Roundabout(x) and Weathered(x) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Weathered(x) and not Shuddering(x) -> Glinting(x))\n\nnot Shuddering(dalia)\n\nSpikelike(dalia) and forall x (Spikelike(x) -> Shuddering(x)) -> therefore Shuddering(dalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Apostolos is meiotic. Apostolos is mossy. Apostolos is baptistic. Beowulf is motive. Beowulf is fatless. Beowulf is meiotic. Beowulf is not extrovert. Weylin is motive. Weylin is not pakistani. Weylin is fatless. Weylin is not mossy. Weylin is not baptistic. If Weylin is extrovert then Weylin is pakistani. If Apostolos is fatless and Apostolos is meiotic then Apostolos is extrovert. If something is baptistic then it is fatless. Round things are fatless. Kind, extrovert things are motive. If something is extrovert and not fatless then it is motive. Apostolos is extrovert.", "logic": "\nMeiotic(apostolos)\nMossy(apostolos)\nBaptistic(apostolos)\nMotive(beowulf)\nFatless(beowulf)\nMeiotic(beowulf)\nnot Extrovert(beowulf)\nMotive(weylin)\nnot Pakistani(weylin)\nFatless(weylin)\nnot Mossy(weylin)\nnot Baptistic(weylin)\nExtrovert(weylin) -> Pakistani(weylin)\nFatless(apostolos) and Meiotic(apostolos) -> Extrovert(apostolos)\nforall x (Baptistic(x) -> Fatless(x))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) -> Fatless(x))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Extrovert(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) and not Fatless(x) -> Motive(x))\n\nExtrovert(apostolos)\n\nBaptistic(apostolos) and forall x (Baptistic(x) -> Fatless(x)) -> therefore Fatless(apostolos) Fatless(apostolos) and Meiotic(apostolos) and Fatless(apostolos) and Meiotic(apostolos) -> Extrovert(apostolos) -> therefore Extrovert(apostolos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Benn is frequent. Benn is unmerited. Benn is slashing. Binnie is galvanic. Binnie is unlicenced. Binnie is frequent. Binnie is not mercerised. Lyndsay is galvanic. Lyndsay is not melodious. Lyndsay is unlicenced. Lyndsay is not unmerited. Lyndsay is not slashing. If Lyndsay is mercerised then Lyndsay is melodious. If Benn is unlicenced and Benn is frequent then Benn is mercerised. If something is slashing then it is unlicenced. Round things are unlicenced. Kind, mercerised things are galvanic. If something is mercerised and not unlicenced then it is galvanic. Benn is not mercerised.", "logic": "\nFrequent(benn)\nUnmerited(benn)\nSlashing(benn)\nGalvanic(binnie)\nUnlicenced(binnie)\nFrequent(binnie)\nnot Mercerised(binnie)\nGalvanic(lyndsay)\nnot Melodious(lyndsay)\nUnlicenced(lyndsay)\nnot Unmerited(lyndsay)\nnot Slashing(lyndsay)\nMercerised(lyndsay) -> Melodious(lyndsay)\nUnlicenced(benn) and Frequent(benn) -> Mercerised(benn)\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Unlicenced(x))\nforall x (Mercerised(x) -> Unlicenced(x))\nforall x (Frequent(x) and Mercerised(x) -> Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Mercerised(x) and not Unlicenced(x) -> Galvanic(x))\n\nnot Mercerised(benn)\n\nSlashing(benn) and forall x (Slashing(x) -> Unlicenced(x)) -> therefore Unlicenced(benn) Unlicenced(benn) and Frequent(benn) and Unlicenced(benn) and Frequent(benn) -> Mercerised(benn) -> therefore Mercerised(benn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Ivy is dreamlike. Ivy is improving. Ivy is diabetic. Zorro is bisontine. Zorro is untaxed. Zorro is dreamlike. Zorro is not anecdotal. Kamila is bisontine. Kamila is not albuminous. Kamila is untaxed. Kamila is not improving. Kamila is not diabetic. If Kamila is anecdotal then Kamila is albuminous. If Ivy is untaxed and Ivy is dreamlike then Ivy is anecdotal. If something is diabetic then it is untaxed. Round things are untaxed. Kind, anecdotal things are bisontine. If something is anecdotal and not untaxed then it is bisontine. Ivy is bisontine.", "logic": "\nDreamlike(ivy)\nImproving(ivy)\nDiabetic(ivy)\nBisontine(zorro)\nUntaxed(zorro)\nDreamlike(zorro)\nnot Anecdotal(zorro)\nBisontine(kamila)\nnot Albuminous(kamila)\nUntaxed(kamila)\nnot Improving(kamila)\nnot Diabetic(kamila)\nAnecdotal(kamila) -> Albuminous(kamila)\nUntaxed(ivy) and Dreamlike(ivy) -> Anecdotal(ivy)\nforall x (Diabetic(x) -> Untaxed(x))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) -> Untaxed(x))\nforall x (Dreamlike(x) and Anecdotal(x) -> Bisontine(x))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) and not Untaxed(x) -> Bisontine(x))\n\nBisontine(ivy)\n\nDiabetic(ivy) and forall x (Diabetic(x) -> Untaxed(x)) -> therefore Untaxed(ivy) Untaxed(ivy) and Dreamlike(ivy) and Untaxed(ivy) and Dreamlike(ivy) -> Anecdotal(ivy) -> therefore Anecdotal(ivy) Dreamlike(ivy) and Anecdotal(ivy) and forall x (Dreamlike(x) and Anecdotal(x) -> Bisontine(x)) -> therefore Bisontine(ivy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Nancie is pliable. Nancie is mineral. Nancie is ideologic. Natalie is linear. Natalie is aweigh. Natalie is pliable. Natalie is not metaphoric. Abagael is linear. Abagael is not utmost. Abagael is aweigh. Abagael is not mineral. Abagael is not ideologic. If Abagael is metaphoric then Abagael is utmost. If Nancie is aweigh and Nancie is pliable then Nancie is metaphoric. If something is ideologic then it is aweigh. Round things are aweigh. Kind, metaphoric things are linear. If something is metaphoric and not aweigh then it is linear. Nancie is not linear.", "logic": "\nPliable(nancie)\nMineral(nancie)\nIdeologic(nancie)\nLinear(natalie)\nAweigh(natalie)\nPliable(natalie)\nnot Metaphoric(natalie)\nLinear(abagael)\nnot Utmost(abagael)\nAweigh(abagael)\nnot Mineral(abagael)\nnot Ideologic(abagael)\nMetaphoric(abagael) -> Utmost(abagael)\nAweigh(nancie) and Pliable(nancie) -> Metaphoric(nancie)\nforall x (Ideologic(x) -> Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) -> Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Pliable(x) and Metaphoric(x) -> Linear(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) and not Aweigh(x) -> Linear(x))\n\nnot Linear(nancie)\n\nIdeologic(nancie) and forall x (Ideologic(x) -> Aweigh(x)) -> therefore Aweigh(nancie) Aweigh(nancie) and Pliable(nancie) and Aweigh(nancie) and Pliable(nancie) -> Metaphoric(nancie) -> therefore Metaphoric(nancie) Pliable(nancie) and Metaphoric(nancie) and forall x (Pliable(x) and Metaphoric(x) -> Linear(x)) -> therefore Linear(nancie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Rosene is heathlike. Rosene is convolute. Rosene is sour. Thorsten is racemose. Thorsten is edgeless. Thorsten is heathlike. Thorsten is not abiding. Saraann is racemose. Saraann is not devalued. Saraann is edgeless. Saraann is not convolute. Saraann is not sour. If Saraann is abiding then Saraann is devalued. If Rosene is edgeless and Rosene is heathlike then Rosene is abiding. If something is sour then it is edgeless. Round things are edgeless. Kind, abiding things are racemose. If something is abiding and not edgeless then it is racemose. Thorsten is not convolute.", "logic": "\nHeathlike(rosene)\nConvolute(rosene)\nSour(rosene)\nRacemose(thorsten)\nEdgeless(thorsten)\nHeathlike(thorsten)\nnot Abiding(thorsten)\nRacemose(saraann)\nnot Devalued(saraann)\nEdgeless(saraann)\nnot Convolute(saraann)\nnot Sour(saraann)\nAbiding(saraann) -> Devalued(saraann)\nEdgeless(rosene) and Heathlike(rosene) -> Abiding(rosene)\nforall x (Sour(x) -> Edgeless(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) -> Edgeless(x))\nforall x (Heathlike(x) and Abiding(x) -> Racemose(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) and not Edgeless(x) -> Racemose(x))\n\nnot Convolute(thorsten)\n\nnot Convolute(thorsten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Celestyn is poached. Celestyn is tyrolean. Celestyn is isothermic. Uriel is pathless. Uriel is fortuitous. Uriel is poached. Uriel is not marooned. Gilberto is pathless. Gilberto is not cogged. Gilberto is fortuitous. Gilberto is not tyrolean. Gilberto is not isothermic. If Gilberto is marooned then Gilberto is cogged. If Celestyn is fortuitous and Celestyn is poached then Celestyn is marooned. If something is isothermic then it is fortuitous. Round things are fortuitous. Kind, marooned things are pathless. If something is marooned and not fortuitous then it is pathless. Gilberto is marooned.", "logic": "\nPoached(celestyn)\nTyrolean(celestyn)\nIsothermic(celestyn)\nPathless(uriel)\nFortuitous(uriel)\nPoached(uriel)\nnot Marooned(uriel)\nPathless(gilberto)\nnot Cogged(gilberto)\nFortuitous(gilberto)\nnot Tyrolean(gilberto)\nnot Isothermic(gilberto)\nMarooned(gilberto) -> Cogged(gilberto)\nFortuitous(celestyn) and Poached(celestyn) -> Marooned(celestyn)\nforall x (Isothermic(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) and Marooned(x) -> Pathless(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) and not Fortuitous(x) -> Pathless(x))\n\nMarooned(gilberto)\n\nMarooned(gilberto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Tait is ruby. Tait is clxxv. Tait is nappy. Agatha is livable. Agatha is afire. Agatha is ruby. Agatha is not vaporized. Wheeler is livable. Wheeler is not shorn. Wheeler is afire. Wheeler is not clxxv. Wheeler is not nappy. If Wheeler is vaporized then Wheeler is shorn. If Tait is afire and Tait is ruby then Tait is vaporized. If something is nappy then it is afire. Round things are afire. Kind, vaporized things are livable. If something is vaporized and not afire then it is livable. Wheeler is not ruby.", "logic": "\nRuby(tait)\nClxxv(tait)\nNappy(tait)\nLivable(agatha)\nAfire(agatha)\nRuby(agatha)\nnot Vaporized(agatha)\nLivable(wheeler)\nnot Shorn(wheeler)\nAfire(wheeler)\nnot Clxxv(wheeler)\nnot Nappy(wheeler)\nVaporized(wheeler) -> Shorn(wheeler)\nAfire(tait) and Ruby(tait) -> Vaporized(tait)\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Ruby(x) and Vaporized(x) -> Livable(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and not Afire(x) -> Livable(x))\n\nnot Ruby(wheeler)\n\nnot Ruby(wheeler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Merilee is mendelian. Merilee is quality. Merilee is taillike. Harrold is fungicidal. Harrold is cussed. Harrold is mendelian. Harrold is not frigorific. Martica is fungicidal. Martica is not persisting. Martica is cussed. Martica is not quality. Martica is not taillike. If Martica is frigorific then Martica is persisting. If Merilee is cussed and Merilee is mendelian then Merilee is frigorific. If something is taillike then it is cussed. Round things are cussed. Kind, frigorific things are fungicidal. If something is frigorific and not cussed then it is fungicidal. Merilee is persisting.", "logic": "\nMendelian(merilee)\nQuality(merilee)\nTaillike(merilee)\nFungicidal(harrold)\nCussed(harrold)\nMendelian(harrold)\nnot Frigorific(harrold)\nFungicidal(martica)\nnot Persisting(martica)\nCussed(martica)\nnot Quality(martica)\nnot Taillike(martica)\nFrigorific(martica) -> Persisting(martica)\nCussed(merilee) and Mendelian(merilee) -> Frigorific(merilee)\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Cussed(x))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) -> Cussed(x))\nforall x (Mendelian(x) and Frigorific(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) and not Cussed(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\n\nPersisting(merilee)\n\nPersisting(merilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Rick is baptised. Rick is haematal. Rick is overactive. Beilul is vitrified. Beilul is magnetic. Beilul is baptised. Beilul is not advertised. Prasun is vitrified. Prasun is not mothy. Prasun is magnetic. Prasun is not haematal. Prasun is not overactive. If Prasun is advertised then Prasun is mothy. If Rick is magnetic and Rick is baptised then Rick is advertised. If something is overactive then it is magnetic. Round things are magnetic. Kind, advertised things are vitrified. If something is advertised and not magnetic then it is vitrified. Beilul is not overactive.", "logic": "\nBaptised(rick)\nHaematal(rick)\nOveractive(rick)\nVitrified(beilul)\nMagnetic(beilul)\nBaptised(beilul)\nnot Advertised(beilul)\nVitrified(prasun)\nnot Mothy(prasun)\nMagnetic(prasun)\nnot Haematal(prasun)\nnot Overactive(prasun)\nAdvertised(prasun) -> Mothy(prasun)\nMagnetic(rick) and Baptised(rick) -> Advertised(rick)\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Magnetic(x))\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> Magnetic(x))\nforall x (Baptised(x) and Advertised(x) -> Vitrified(x))\nforall x (Advertised(x) and not Magnetic(x) -> Vitrified(x))\n\nnot Overactive(beilul)\n\nnot Overactive(beilul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Lonny is tottering. Lonny is panoplied. Lonny is stricken. Othella is veinlike. Othella is shaved. Othella is tottering. Othella is not prakritic. Demetre is veinlike. Demetre is not oral. Demetre is shaved. Demetre is not panoplied. Demetre is not stricken. If Demetre is prakritic then Demetre is oral. If Lonny is shaved and Lonny is tottering then Lonny is prakritic. If something is stricken then it is shaved. Round things are shaved. Kind, prakritic things are veinlike. If something is prakritic and not shaved then it is veinlike. Othella is oral.", "logic": "\nTottering(lonny)\nPanoplied(lonny)\nStricken(lonny)\nVeinlike(othella)\nShaved(othella)\nTottering(othella)\nnot Prakritic(othella)\nVeinlike(demetre)\nnot Oral(demetre)\nShaved(demetre)\nnot Panoplied(demetre)\nnot Stricken(demetre)\nPrakritic(demetre) -> Oral(demetre)\nShaved(lonny) and Tottering(lonny) -> Prakritic(lonny)\nforall x (Stricken(x) -> Shaved(x))\nforall x (Prakritic(x) -> Shaved(x))\nforall x (Tottering(x) and Prakritic(x) -> Veinlike(x))\nforall x (Prakritic(x) and not Shaved(x) -> Veinlike(x))\n\nOral(othella)\n\nOral(othella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Ediva is dominican. Ediva is incredible. Ediva is longish. Ediva is belittled. Ediva is overjoyed. Rycca is thrilling. Cleopatra is dominican. Cleopatra is thrilling. Cleopatra is elated. Cleopatra is incredible. Cleopatra is longish. Cleopatra is belittled. Cleopatra is overjoyed. Aleecia is dominican. Aleecia is belittled. If someone is incredible then they are longish. If Aleecia is dominican and Aleecia is longish then Aleecia is thrilling. All belittled people are incredible. Cleopatra is thrilling.", "logic": "\nDominican(ediva)\nIncredible(ediva)\nLongish(ediva)\nBelittled(ediva)\nOverjoyed(ediva)\nThrilling(rycca)\nDominican(cleopatra)\nThrilling(cleopatra)\nElated(cleopatra)\nIncredible(cleopatra)\nLongish(cleopatra)\nBelittled(cleopatra)\nOverjoyed(cleopatra)\nDominican(aleecia)\nBelittled(aleecia)\nforall x (Incredible(x) -> Longish(x))\nDominican(aleecia) and Longish(aleecia) -> Thrilling(aleecia)\nforall x (Belittled(x) -> Incredible(x))\n\nThrilling(cleopatra)\n\ntherefore Thrilling(cleopatra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Lonnie is clean. Lonnie is collegial. Lonnie is humanlike. Lonnie is avid. Lonnie is anserine. Adah is unparented. Jeremie is clean. Jeremie is unparented. Jeremie is seagirt. Jeremie is collegial. Jeremie is humanlike. Jeremie is avid. Jeremie is anserine. Alix is clean. Alix is avid. If someone is collegial then they are humanlike. If Alix is clean and Alix is humanlike then Alix is unparented. All avid people are collegial. Jeremie is not anserine.", "logic": "\nClean(lonnie)\nCollegial(lonnie)\nHumanlike(lonnie)\nAvid(lonnie)\nAnserine(lonnie)\nUnparented(adah)\nClean(jeremie)\nUnparented(jeremie)\nSeagirt(jeremie)\nCollegial(jeremie)\nHumanlike(jeremie)\nAvid(jeremie)\nAnserine(jeremie)\nClean(alix)\nAvid(alix)\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Humanlike(x))\nClean(alix) and Humanlike(alix) -> Unparented(alix)\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Collegial(x))\n\nnot Anserine(jeremie)\n\ntherefore Anserine(jeremie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Alvera is blunted. Alvera is burdenless. Alvera is acroscopic. Alvera is roundabout. Alvera is perverted. Rubia is starless. Taffy is blunted. Taffy is starless. Taffy is irritative. Taffy is burdenless. Taffy is acroscopic. Taffy is roundabout. Taffy is perverted. Mirabella is blunted. Mirabella is roundabout. If someone is burdenless then they are acroscopic. If Mirabella is blunted and Mirabella is acroscopic then Mirabella is starless. All roundabout people are burdenless. Mirabella is burdenless.", "logic": "\nBlunted(alvera)\nBurdenless(alvera)\nAcroscopic(alvera)\nRoundabout(alvera)\nPerverted(alvera)\nStarless(rubia)\nBlunted(taffy)\nStarless(taffy)\nIrritative(taffy)\nBurdenless(taffy)\nAcroscopic(taffy)\nRoundabout(taffy)\nPerverted(taffy)\nBlunted(mirabella)\nRoundabout(mirabella)\nforall x (Burdenless(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\nBlunted(mirabella) and Acroscopic(mirabella) -> Starless(mirabella)\nforall x (Roundabout(x) -> Burdenless(x))\n\nBurdenless(mirabella)\n\nRoundabout(mirabella) and forall x (Roundabout(x) -> Burdenless(x)) -> therefore Burdenless(mirabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Melamie is obovate. Melamie is fiftieth. Melamie is home. Melamie is fussy. Melamie is unplanted. Deloria is socialised. Emelia is obovate. Emelia is socialised. Emelia is cypriote. Emelia is fiftieth. Emelia is home. Emelia is fussy. Emelia is unplanted. Nikkie is obovate. Nikkie is fussy. If someone is fiftieth then they are home. If Nikkie is obovate and Nikkie is home then Nikkie is socialised. All fussy people are fiftieth. Nikkie is not fiftieth.", "logic": "\nObovate(melamie)\nFiftieth(melamie)\nHome(melamie)\nFussy(melamie)\nUnplanted(melamie)\nSocialised(deloria)\nObovate(emelia)\nSocialised(emelia)\nCypriote(emelia)\nFiftieth(emelia)\nHome(emelia)\nFussy(emelia)\nUnplanted(emelia)\nObovate(nikkie)\nFussy(nikkie)\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) -> Home(x))\nObovate(nikkie) and Home(nikkie) -> Socialised(nikkie)\nforall x (Fussy(x) -> Fiftieth(x))\n\nnot Fiftieth(nikkie)\n\nFussy(nikkie) and forall x (Fussy(x) -> Fiftieth(x)) -> therefore Fiftieth(nikkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Ethelyn is furlike. Ethelyn is stylistic. Ethelyn is situated. Ethelyn is uncrannied. Ethelyn is incised. Jerrilyn is unromantic. Gonzales is furlike. Gonzales is unromantic. Gonzales is otic. Gonzales is stylistic. Gonzales is situated. Gonzales is uncrannied. Gonzales is incised. Jillian is furlike. Jillian is uncrannied. If someone is stylistic then they are situated. If Jillian is furlike and Jillian is situated then Jillian is unromantic. All uncrannied people are stylistic. Jillian is situated.", "logic": "\nFurlike(ethelyn)\nStylistic(ethelyn)\nSituated(ethelyn)\nUncrannied(ethelyn)\nIncised(ethelyn)\nUnromantic(jerrilyn)\nFurlike(gonzales)\nUnromantic(gonzales)\nOtic(gonzales)\nStylistic(gonzales)\nSituated(gonzales)\nUncrannied(gonzales)\nIncised(gonzales)\nFurlike(jillian)\nUncrannied(jillian)\nforall x (Stylistic(x) -> Situated(x))\nFurlike(jillian) and Situated(jillian) -> Unromantic(jillian)\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) -> Stylistic(x))\n\nSituated(jillian)\n\nUncrannied(jillian) and forall x (Uncrannied(x) -> Stylistic(x)) -> therefore Stylistic(jillian) Stylistic(jillian) and forall x (Stylistic(x) -> Situated(x)) -> therefore Situated(jillian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Shandee is wizened. Shandee is frictional. Shandee is corky. Shandee is xenogeneic. Shandee is arcane. Ambrosia is scholarly. Saree is wizened. Saree is scholarly. Saree is ominous. Saree is frictional. Saree is corky. Saree is xenogeneic. Saree is arcane. Willy is wizened. Willy is xenogeneic. If someone is frictional then they are corky. If Willy is wizened and Willy is corky then Willy is scholarly. All xenogeneic people are frictional. Willy is not corky.", "logic": "\nWizened(shandee)\nFrictional(shandee)\nCorky(shandee)\nXenogeneic(shandee)\nArcane(shandee)\nScholarly(ambrosia)\nWizened(saree)\nScholarly(saree)\nOminous(saree)\nFrictional(saree)\nCorky(saree)\nXenogeneic(saree)\nArcane(saree)\nWizened(willy)\nXenogeneic(willy)\nforall x (Frictional(x) -> Corky(x))\nWizened(willy) and Corky(willy) -> Scholarly(willy)\nforall x (Xenogeneic(x) -> Frictional(x))\n\nnot Corky(willy)\n\nXenogeneic(willy) and forall x (Xenogeneic(x) -> Frictional(x)) -> therefore Frictional(willy) Frictional(willy) and forall x (Frictional(x) -> Corky(x)) -> therefore Corky(willy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Pru is scalloped. Pru is another. Pru is decided. Pru is telescoped. Pru is miniature. Lars is hindering. Calhoun is scalloped. Calhoun is hindering. Calhoun is recurring. Calhoun is another. Calhoun is decided. Calhoun is telescoped. Calhoun is miniature. Arleyne is scalloped. Arleyne is telescoped. If someone is another then they are decided. If Arleyne is scalloped and Arleyne is decided then Arleyne is hindering. All telescoped people are another. Arleyne is hindering.", "logic": "\nScalloped(pru)\nAnother(pru)\nDecided(pru)\nTelescoped(pru)\nMiniature(pru)\nHindering(lars)\nScalloped(calhoun)\nHindering(calhoun)\nRecurring(calhoun)\nAnother(calhoun)\nDecided(calhoun)\nTelescoped(calhoun)\nMiniature(calhoun)\nScalloped(arleyne)\nTelescoped(arleyne)\nforall x (Another(x) -> Decided(x))\nScalloped(arleyne) and Decided(arleyne) -> Hindering(arleyne)\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Another(x))\n\nHindering(arleyne)\n\nTelescoped(arleyne) and forall x (Telescoped(x) -> Another(x)) -> therefore Another(arleyne) Another(arleyne) and forall x (Another(x) -> Decided(x)) -> therefore Decided(arleyne) Scalloped(arleyne) and Decided(arleyne) and Scalloped(arleyne) and Decided(arleyne) -> Hindering(arleyne) -> therefore Hindering(arleyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Sawyere is iniquitous. Sawyere is squishy. Sawyere is anestric. Sawyere is nonstop. Sawyere is wiry. Bartie is cetacean. Debbra is iniquitous. Debbra is cetacean. Debbra is clouded. Debbra is squishy. Debbra is anestric. Debbra is nonstop. Debbra is wiry. Chane is iniquitous. Chane is nonstop. If someone is squishy then they are anestric. If Chane is iniquitous and Chane is anestric then Chane is cetacean. All nonstop people are squishy. Chane is not cetacean.", "logic": "\nIniquitous(sawyere)\nSquishy(sawyere)\nAnestric(sawyere)\nNonstop(sawyere)\nWiry(sawyere)\nCetacean(bartie)\nIniquitous(debbra)\nCetacean(debbra)\nClouded(debbra)\nSquishy(debbra)\nAnestric(debbra)\nNonstop(debbra)\nWiry(debbra)\nIniquitous(chane)\nNonstop(chane)\nforall x (Squishy(x) -> Anestric(x))\nIniquitous(chane) and Anestric(chane) -> Cetacean(chane)\nforall x (Nonstop(x) -> Squishy(x))\n\nnot Cetacean(chane)\n\nNonstop(chane) and forall x (Nonstop(x) -> Squishy(x)) -> therefore Squishy(chane) Squishy(chane) and forall x (Squishy(x) -> Anestric(x)) -> therefore Anestric(chane) Iniquitous(chane) and Anestric(chane) and Iniquitous(chane) and Anestric(chane) -> Cetacean(chane) -> therefore Cetacean(chane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Stephanie is chilean. Stephanie is hairy. Stephanie is extirpable. Stephanie is wingless. Stephanie is ginger. Vivyan is illusory. Jermayne is chilean. Jermayne is illusory. Jermayne is unvaried. Jermayne is hairy. Jermayne is extirpable. Jermayne is wingless. Jermayne is ginger. Webster is chilean. Webster is wingless. If someone is hairy then they are extirpable. If Webster is chilean and Webster is extirpable then Webster is illusory. All wingless people are hairy. Vivyan is not hairy.", "logic": "\nChilean(stephanie)\nHairy(stephanie)\nExtirpable(stephanie)\nWingless(stephanie)\nGinger(stephanie)\nIllusory(vivyan)\nChilean(jermayne)\nIllusory(jermayne)\nUnvaried(jermayne)\nHairy(jermayne)\nExtirpable(jermayne)\nWingless(jermayne)\nGinger(jermayne)\nChilean(webster)\nWingless(webster)\nforall x (Hairy(x) -> Extirpable(x))\nChilean(webster) and Extirpable(webster) -> Illusory(webster)\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Hairy(x))\n\nnot Hairy(vivyan)\n\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Hairy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Fairfax is copesetic. Fairfax is adactylous. Fairfax is malaysian. Fairfax is cantabile. Fairfax is wistful. Rodd is mown. Husein is copesetic. Husein is mown. Husein is irritative. Husein is adactylous. Husein is malaysian. Husein is cantabile. Husein is wistful. Valera is copesetic. Valera is cantabile. If someone is adactylous then they are malaysian. If Valera is copesetic and Valera is malaysian then Valera is mown. All cantabile people are adactylous. Rodd is malaysian.", "logic": "\nCopesetic(fairfax)\nAdactylous(fairfax)\nMalaysian(fairfax)\nCantabile(fairfax)\nWistful(fairfax)\nMown(rodd)\nCopesetic(husein)\nMown(husein)\nIrritative(husein)\nAdactylous(husein)\nMalaysian(husein)\nCantabile(husein)\nWistful(husein)\nCopesetic(valera)\nCantabile(valera)\nforall x (Adactylous(x) -> Malaysian(x))\nCopesetic(valera) and Malaysian(valera) -> Mown(valera)\nforall x (Cantabile(x) -> Adactylous(x))\n\nMalaysian(rodd)\n\nforall x (Adactylous(x) -> Malaysian(x)) <- forall x (Cantabile(x) -> Adactylous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Tabatha is abdicable. Tabatha is dirt. Tabatha is undisputed. Tabatha is impolite. Tabatha is alarming. Wynton is euclidian. Joanie is abdicable. Joanie is euclidian. Joanie is unwelcome. Joanie is dirt. Joanie is undisputed. Joanie is impolite. Joanie is alarming. Ara is abdicable. Ara is impolite. If someone is dirt then they are undisputed. If Ara is abdicable and Ara is undisputed then Ara is euclidian. All impolite people are dirt. Ara is not unwelcome.", "logic": "\nAbdicable(tabatha)\nDirt(tabatha)\nUndisputed(tabatha)\nImpolite(tabatha)\nAlarming(tabatha)\nEuclidian(wynton)\nAbdicable(joanie)\nEuclidian(joanie)\nUnwelcome(joanie)\nDirt(joanie)\nUndisputed(joanie)\nImpolite(joanie)\nAlarming(joanie)\nAbdicable(ara)\nImpolite(ara)\nforall x (Dirt(x) -> Undisputed(x))\nAbdicable(ara) and Undisputed(ara) -> Euclidian(ara)\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Dirt(x))\n\nnot Unwelcome(ara)\n\nnot Unwelcome(ara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Donna is plundered. Donna is pyrolytic. Donna is astomatous. Donna is parky. Donna is zealous. Jeannine is caesarian. Patrice is plundered. Patrice is caesarian. Patrice is corrigible. Patrice is pyrolytic. Patrice is astomatous. Patrice is parky. Patrice is zealous. Cori is plundered. Cori is parky. If someone is pyrolytic then they are astomatous. If Cori is plundered and Cori is astomatous then Cori is caesarian. All parky people are pyrolytic. Donna is corrigible.", "logic": "\nPlundered(donna)\nPyrolytic(donna)\nAstomatous(donna)\nParky(donna)\nZealous(donna)\nCaesarian(jeannine)\nPlundered(patrice)\nCaesarian(patrice)\nCorrigible(patrice)\nPyrolytic(patrice)\nAstomatous(patrice)\nParky(patrice)\nZealous(patrice)\nPlundered(cori)\nParky(cori)\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Astomatous(x))\nPlundered(cori) and Astomatous(cori) -> Caesarian(cori)\nforall x (Parky(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\n\nCorrigible(donna)\n\nCorrigible(donna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Bernhard is clean. Bernhard is coaxing. Bernhard is effulgent. Bernhard is ascensive. Bernhard is textbook. Monroe is headlike. Larissa is clean. Larissa is headlike. Larissa is tripinnate. Larissa is coaxing. Larissa is effulgent. Larissa is ascensive. Larissa is textbook. Flossie is clean. Flossie is ascensive. If someone is coaxing then they are effulgent. If Flossie is clean and Flossie is effulgent then Flossie is headlike. All ascensive people are coaxing. Monroe is not ascensive.", "logic": "\nClean(bernhard)\nCoaxing(bernhard)\nEffulgent(bernhard)\nAscensive(bernhard)\nTextbook(bernhard)\nHeadlike(monroe)\nClean(larissa)\nHeadlike(larissa)\nTripinnate(larissa)\nCoaxing(larissa)\nEffulgent(larissa)\nAscensive(larissa)\nTextbook(larissa)\nClean(flossie)\nAscensive(flossie)\nforall x (Coaxing(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nClean(flossie) and Effulgent(flossie) -> Headlike(flossie)\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Coaxing(x))\n\nnot Ascensive(monroe)\n\nnot Ascensive(monroe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Gabbey is uproarious. Gabbey is macedonian. Gabbey is goosey. Gabbey is lowbred. Gabbey is offish. Gerard is accoutred. Chelsae is uproarious. Chelsae is accoutred. Chelsae is laciniate. Chelsae is macedonian. Chelsae is goosey. Chelsae is lowbred. Chelsae is offish. Jae is uproarious. Jae is lowbred. If someone is macedonian then they are goosey. If Jae is uproarious and Jae is goosey then Jae is accoutred. All lowbred people are macedonian. Gerard is uproarious.", "logic": "\nUproarious(gabbey)\nMacedonian(gabbey)\nGoosey(gabbey)\nLowbred(gabbey)\nOffish(gabbey)\nAccoutred(gerard)\nUproarious(chelsae)\nAccoutred(chelsae)\nLaciniate(chelsae)\nMacedonian(chelsae)\nGoosey(chelsae)\nLowbred(chelsae)\nOffish(chelsae)\nUproarious(jae)\nLowbred(jae)\nforall x (Macedonian(x) -> Goosey(x))\nUproarious(jae) and Goosey(jae) -> Accoutred(jae)\nforall x (Lowbred(x) -> Macedonian(x))\n\nUproarious(gerard)\n\nUproarious(gerard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Vachel is summary. Vachel is hydroponic. Vachel is rounded. Vachel is bacillar. Vachel is apomictic. Heda is fascistic. Marya is summary. Marya is fascistic. Marya is dizygotic. Marya is hydroponic. Marya is rounded. Marya is bacillar. Marya is apomictic. Prisca is summary. Prisca is bacillar. If someone is hydroponic then they are rounded. If Prisca is summary and Prisca is rounded then Prisca is fascistic. All bacillar people are hydroponic. Heda is not dizygotic.", "logic": "\nSummary(vachel)\nHydroponic(vachel)\nRounded(vachel)\nBacillar(vachel)\nApomictic(vachel)\nFascistic(heda)\nSummary(marya)\nFascistic(marya)\nDizygotic(marya)\nHydroponic(marya)\nRounded(marya)\nBacillar(marya)\nApomictic(marya)\nSummary(prisca)\nBacillar(prisca)\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Rounded(x))\nSummary(prisca) and Rounded(prisca) -> Fascistic(prisca)\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\n\nnot Dizygotic(heda)\n\nnot Dizygotic(heda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Mitchael is glowing. Mitchael is summery. Mitchael is lamented. Mitchael is tethered. Mitchael is perdurable. Damaris is toed. Hewe is glowing. Hewe is toed. Hewe is semisolid. Hewe is summery. Hewe is lamented. Hewe is tethered. Hewe is perdurable. Hesther is glowing. Hesther is tethered. If someone is summery then they are lamented. If Hesther is glowing and Hesther is lamented then Hesther is toed. All tethered people are summery. Damaris is perdurable.", "logic": "\nGlowing(mitchael)\nSummery(mitchael)\nLamented(mitchael)\nTethered(mitchael)\nPerdurable(mitchael)\nToed(damaris)\nGlowing(hewe)\nToed(hewe)\nSemisolid(hewe)\nSummery(hewe)\nLamented(hewe)\nTethered(hewe)\nPerdurable(hewe)\nGlowing(hesther)\nTethered(hesther)\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Lamented(x))\nGlowing(hesther) and Lamented(hesther) -> Toed(hesther)\nforall x (Tethered(x) -> Summery(x))\n\nPerdurable(damaris)\n\nPerdurable(damaris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "The bartlet is odourless. All odourless things are categorial. Cold things are malign. Rough things are crinoid. All crinoid things are odourless. If the bartlet is categorial then the bartlet is malign. All malign things are perigonal. All crinoid, perigonal things are odourless. All categorial things are odourless. The bartlet is odourless.", "logic": "\nOdourless(bartlet)\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Perigonal(x) -> Malign(x))\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Crinoid(x))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) -> Odourless(x))\nCategorial(bartlet) -> Malign(bartlet)\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Perigonal(x))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Odourless(x))\nforall x (Categorial(x) -> Odourless(x))\n\nOdourless(bartlet)\n\ntherefore Odourless(bartlet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The reiko is coppery. All coppery things are soapy. Cold things are archean. Rough things are supersonic. All supersonic things are coppery. If the reiko is soapy then the reiko is archean. All archean things are libyan. All supersonic, libyan things are coppery. All soapy things are coppery. The reiko is not coppery.", "logic": "\nCoppery(reiko)\nforall x (Coppery(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) -> Archean(x))\nforall x (Archean(x) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Supersonic(x) -> Coppery(x))\nSoapy(reiko) -> Archean(reiko)\nforall x (Archean(x) -> Libyan(x))\nforall x (Supersonic(x) and Libyan(x) -> Coppery(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) -> Coppery(x))\n\nnot Coppery(reiko)\n\ntherefore Coppery(reiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The ari is irritable. All irritable things are spare. Cold things are cumulous. Rough things are ambient. All ambient things are irritable. If the ari is spare then the ari is cumulous. All cumulous things are dictated. All ambient, dictated things are irritable. All spare things are irritable. The ari is spare.", "logic": "\nIrritable(ari)\nforall x (Irritable(x) -> Spare(x))\nforall x (Dictated(x) -> Cumulous(x))\nforall x (Cumulous(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> Irritable(x))\nSpare(ari) -> Cumulous(ari)\nforall x (Cumulous(x) -> Dictated(x))\nforall x (Ambient(x) and Dictated(x) -> Irritable(x))\nforall x (Spare(x) -> Irritable(x))\n\nSpare(ari)\n\nIrritable(ari) and forall x (Irritable(x) -> Spare(x)) -> therefore Spare(ari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The arnoldo is strapping. All strapping things are mythic. Cold things are stark. Rough things are barmy. All barmy things are strapping. If the arnoldo is mythic then the arnoldo is stark. All stark things are assessable. All barmy, assessable things are strapping. All mythic things are strapping. The arnoldo is not mythic.", "logic": "\nStrapping(arnoldo)\nforall x (Strapping(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Assessable(x) -> Stark(x))\nforall x (Stark(x) -> Barmy(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) -> Strapping(x))\nMythic(arnoldo) -> Stark(arnoldo)\nforall x (Stark(x) -> Assessable(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) and Assessable(x) -> Strapping(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) -> Strapping(x))\n\nnot Mythic(arnoldo)\n\nStrapping(arnoldo) and forall x (Strapping(x) -> Mythic(x)) -> therefore Mythic(arnoldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The corrianne is naiant. All naiant things are tropical. Cold things are paradisiac. Rough things are wrapped. All wrapped things are naiant. If the corrianne is tropical then the corrianne is paradisiac. All paradisiac things are whole. All wrapped, whole things are naiant. All tropical things are naiant. The corrianne is paradisiac.", "logic": "\nNaiant(corrianne)\nforall x (Naiant(x) -> Tropical(x))\nforall x (Whole(x) -> Paradisiac(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) -> Wrapped(x))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) -> Naiant(x))\nTropical(corrianne) -> Paradisiac(corrianne)\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) -> Whole(x))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) and Whole(x) -> Naiant(x))\nforall x (Tropical(x) -> Naiant(x))\n\nParadisiac(corrianne)\n\nNaiant(corrianne) and forall x (Naiant(x) -> Tropical(x)) -> therefore Tropical(corrianne) Tropical(corrianne) and Tropical(corrianne) -> Paradisiac(corrianne) -> therefore Paradisiac(corrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The timotheus is midland. All midland things are sororal. Cold things are unisexual. Rough things are blockading. All blockading things are midland. If the timotheus is sororal then the timotheus is unisexual. All unisexual things are zymoid. All blockading, zymoid things are midland. All sororal things are midland. The timotheus is not unisexual.", "logic": "\nMidland(timotheus)\nforall x (Midland(x) -> Sororal(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Unisexual(x))\nforall x (Unisexual(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) -> Midland(x))\nSororal(timotheus) -> Unisexual(timotheus)\nforall x (Unisexual(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Zymoid(x) -> Midland(x))\nforall x (Sororal(x) -> Midland(x))\n\nnot Unisexual(timotheus)\n\nMidland(timotheus) and forall x (Midland(x) -> Sororal(x)) -> therefore Sororal(timotheus) Sororal(timotheus) and Sororal(timotheus) -> Unisexual(timotheus) -> therefore Unisexual(timotheus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The emanuel is arterial. All arterial things are abiding. Cold things are vacillant. Rough things are global. All global things are arterial. If the emanuel is abiding then the emanuel is vacillant. All vacillant things are chanted. All global, chanted things are arterial. All abiding things are arterial. The emanuel is chanted.", "logic": "\nArterial(emanuel)\nforall x (Arterial(x) -> Abiding(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Vacillant(x))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Global(x))\nforall x (Global(x) -> Arterial(x))\nAbiding(emanuel) -> Vacillant(emanuel)\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Chanted(x))\nforall x (Global(x) and Chanted(x) -> Arterial(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) -> Arterial(x))\n\nChanted(emanuel)\n\nArterial(emanuel) and forall x (Arterial(x) -> Abiding(x)) -> therefore Abiding(emanuel) Abiding(emanuel) and Abiding(emanuel) -> Vacillant(emanuel) -> therefore Vacillant(emanuel) Vacillant(emanuel) and forall x (Vacillant(x) -> Chanted(x)) -> therefore Chanted(emanuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The janel is assertable. All assertable things are bicornuous. Cold things are lonely. Rough things are unlogical. All unlogical things are assertable. If the janel is bicornuous then the janel is lonely. All lonely things are unsalted. All unlogical, unsalted things are assertable. All bicornuous things are assertable. The janel is not unsalted.", "logic": "\nAssertable(janel)\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> Lonely(x))\nforall x (Lonely(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> Assertable(x))\nBicornuous(janel) -> Lonely(janel)\nforall x (Lonely(x) -> Unsalted(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) and Unsalted(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Bicornuous(x) -> Assertable(x))\n\nnot Unsalted(janel)\n\nAssertable(janel) and forall x (Assertable(x) -> Bicornuous(x)) -> therefore Bicornuous(janel) Bicornuous(janel) and Bicornuous(janel) -> Lonely(janel) -> therefore Lonely(janel) Lonely(janel) and forall x (Lonely(x) -> Unsalted(x)) -> therefore Unsalted(janel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The florida is unseeable. All unseeable things are safe. Cold things are winglike. Rough things are impudent. All impudent things are unseeable. If the florida is safe then the florida is winglike. All winglike things are uncarpeted. All impudent, uncarpeted things are unseeable. All safe things are unseeable. The florida does not see the florida.", "logic": "\nUnseeable(florida)\nforall x (Unseeable(x) -> Safe(x))\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) -> Winglike(x))\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nSafe(florida) -> Winglike(florida)\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Uncarpeted(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Safe(x) -> Unseeable(x))\n\nnot Sees(florida, florida)\n\nnot Sees(florida, florida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The arlette is celebrated. All celebrated things are striped. Cold things are tactical. Rough things are ratlike. All ratlike things are celebrated. If the arlette is striped then the arlette is tactical. All tactical things are anarchic. All ratlike, anarchic things are celebrated. All striped things are celebrated. The arlette needs the arlette.", "logic": "\nCelebrated(arlette)\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Striped(x))\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Ratlike(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) -> Celebrated(x))\nStriped(arlette) -> Tactical(arlette)\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Anarchic(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) and Anarchic(x) -> Celebrated(x))\nforall x (Striped(x) -> Celebrated(x))\n\nNeeds(arlette, arlette)\n\nNeeds(arlette, arlette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The blondelle is mere. The brewster allot the blondelle. The ellette allot the brewster. If someone is mere then they chase the blondelle. If someone is chinese then they do not chase the blondelle. If someone is scraggly then they chase the brewster. If someone is sinewy and they do not eat the blondelle then the blondelle does not see the brewster. If the ellette is sinewy then the ellette allot the brewster. If someone stutter the blondelle then the blondelle stutter the brewster. If someone stutter the brewster then the brewster does not see the ellette. If someone allot the blondelle then the blondelle allot the ellette. The blondelle is mere.", "logic": "\nMere(blondelle)\nAllot(brewster, blondelle)\nAllot(ellette, brewster)\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Stutter(x, blondelle))\nforall x (Chinese(x) -> not Stutter(x, blondelle))\nforall x (Scraggly(x) -> Stutter(x, brewster))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and not Allot(x, blondelle) -> not Bolshevise(blondelle, brewster))\nSinewy(ellette) -> Allot(ellette, brewster)\nforall x (Stutter(x, blondelle) -> Stutter(blondelle, brewster))\nforall x (Stutter(x, brewster) -> not Bolshevise(brewster, ellette))\nforall x (Allot(x, blondelle) -> Allot(blondelle, ellette))\n\nMere(blondelle)\n\ntherefore Mere(blondelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The roosevelt is doughy. The aguinaldo rhapsodise the roosevelt. The bernadina rhapsodise the aguinaldo. If someone is doughy then they chase the roosevelt. If someone is vermicular then they do not chase the roosevelt. If someone is touched then they chase the aguinaldo. If someone is absolutist and they do not eat the roosevelt then the roosevelt does not see the aguinaldo. If the bernadina is absolutist then the bernadina rhapsodise the aguinaldo. If someone indite the roosevelt then the roosevelt indite the aguinaldo. If someone indite the aguinaldo then the aguinaldo does not see the bernadina. If someone rhapsodise the roosevelt then the roosevelt rhapsodise the bernadina. The bernadina does not eat the aguinaldo.", "logic": "\nDoughy(roosevelt)\nRhapsodise(aguinaldo, roosevelt)\nRhapsodise(bernadina, aguinaldo)\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Indite(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Vermicular(x) -> not Indite(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Touched(x) -> Indite(x, aguinaldo))\nforall x (Absolutist(x) and not Rhapsodise(x, roosevelt) -> not Unclasp(roosevelt, aguinaldo))\nAbsolutist(bernadina) -> Rhapsodise(bernadina, aguinaldo)\nforall x (Indite(x, roosevelt) -> Indite(roosevelt, aguinaldo))\nforall x (Indite(x, aguinaldo) -> not Unclasp(aguinaldo, bernadina))\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, roosevelt) -> Rhapsodise(roosevelt, bernadina))\n\nnot Rhapsodise(bernadina, aguinaldo)\n\ntherefore Rhapsodise(bernadina, aguinaldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The trixy is congolese. The sergent stargaze the trixy. The erl stargaze the sergent. If someone is congolese then they chase the trixy. If someone is bogus then they do not chase the trixy. If someone is hispanic then they chase the sergent. If someone is corruptive and they do not eat the trixy then the trixy does not see the sergent. If the erl is corruptive then the erl stargaze the sergent. If someone microwave the trixy then the trixy microwave the sergent. If someone microwave the sergent then the sergent does not see the erl. If someone stargaze the trixy then the trixy stargaze the erl. The trixy microwave the trixy.", "logic": "\nCongolese(trixy)\nStargaze(sergent, trixy)\nStargaze(erl, sergent)\nforall x (Congolese(x) -> Microwave(x, trixy))\nforall x (Bogus(x) -> not Microwave(x, trixy))\nforall x (Hispanic(x) -> Microwave(x, sergent))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) and not Stargaze(x, trixy) -> not Respect(trixy, sergent))\nCorruptive(erl) -> Stargaze(erl, sergent)\nforall x (Microwave(x, trixy) -> Microwave(trixy, sergent))\nforall x (Microwave(x, sergent) -> not Respect(sergent, erl))\nforall x (Stargaze(x, trixy) -> Stargaze(trixy, erl))\n\nMicrowave(trixy, trixy)\n\nCongolese(trixy) and forall x (Congolese(x) -> Microwave(x, trixy)) -> therefore Microwave(trixy, trixy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The iseabal is ethnologic. The adrea steady the iseabal. The traci steady the adrea. If someone is ethnologic then they chase the iseabal. If someone is perinatal then they do not chase the iseabal. If someone is flustered then they chase the adrea. If someone is lowset and they do not eat the iseabal then the iseabal does not see the adrea. If the traci is lowset then the traci steady the adrea. If someone belch the iseabal then the iseabal belch the adrea. If someone belch the adrea then the adrea does not see the traci. If someone steady the iseabal then the iseabal steady the traci. The iseabal does not eat the traci.", "logic": "\nEthnologic(iseabal)\nSteady(adrea, iseabal)\nSteady(traci, adrea)\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> Belch(x, iseabal))\nforall x (Perinatal(x) -> not Belch(x, iseabal))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Belch(x, adrea))\nforall x (Lowset(x) and not Steady(x, iseabal) -> not Caucus(iseabal, adrea))\nLowset(traci) -> Steady(traci, adrea)\nforall x (Belch(x, iseabal) -> Belch(iseabal, adrea))\nforall x (Belch(x, adrea) -> not Caucus(adrea, traci))\nforall x (Steady(x, iseabal) -> Steady(iseabal, traci))\n\nnot Steady(iseabal, traci)\n\nSteady(adrea, iseabal) and forall x (Steady(x, iseabal) -> Steady(iseabal, traci)) -> therefore Steady(iseabal, traci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The kassie is meningeal. The wallace firebomb the kassie. The desiri firebomb the wallace. If someone is meningeal then they chase the kassie. If someone is isotropous then they do not chase the kassie. If someone is muddy then they chase the wallace. If someone is partitive and they do not eat the kassie then the kassie does not see the wallace. If the desiri is partitive then the desiri firebomb the wallace. If someone revitalise the kassie then the kassie revitalise the wallace. If someone revitalise the wallace then the wallace does not see the desiri. If someone firebomb the kassie then the kassie firebomb the desiri. The kassie revitalise the wallace.", "logic": "\nMeningeal(kassie)\nFirebomb(wallace, kassie)\nFirebomb(desiri, wallace)\nforall x (Meningeal(x) -> Revitalise(x, kassie))\nforall x (Isotropous(x) -> not Revitalise(x, kassie))\nforall x (Muddy(x) -> Revitalise(x, wallace))\nforall x (Partitive(x) and not Firebomb(x, kassie) -> not Grease(kassie, wallace))\nPartitive(desiri) -> Firebomb(desiri, wallace)\nforall x (Revitalise(x, kassie) -> Revitalise(kassie, wallace))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, wallace) -> not Grease(wallace, desiri))\nforall x (Firebomb(x, kassie) -> Firebomb(kassie, desiri))\n\nRevitalise(kassie, wallace)\n\nMeningeal(kassie) and forall x (Meningeal(x) -> Revitalise(x, kassie)) -> therefore Revitalise(kassie, kassie) Revitalise(kassie, kassie) and forall x (Revitalise(x, kassie) -> Revitalise(kassie, wallace)) -> therefore Revitalise(kassie, wallace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The fiorenze is fusty. The nick crick the fiorenze. The clarette crick the nick. If someone is fusty then they chase the fiorenze. If someone is neurogenic then they do not chase the fiorenze. If someone is perturbing then they chase the nick. If someone is abient and they do not eat the fiorenze then the fiorenze does not see the nick. If the clarette is abient then the clarette crick the nick. If someone jewel the fiorenze then the fiorenze jewel the nick. If someone jewel the nick then the nick does not see the clarette. If someone crick the fiorenze then the fiorenze crick the clarette. The fiorenze does not chase the nick.", "logic": "\nFusty(fiorenze)\nCrick(nick, fiorenze)\nCrick(clarette, nick)\nforall x (Fusty(x) -> Jewel(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Neurogenic(x) -> not Jewel(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) -> Jewel(x, nick))\nforall x (Abient(x) and not Crick(x, fiorenze) -> not Plop(fiorenze, nick))\nAbient(clarette) -> Crick(clarette, nick)\nforall x (Jewel(x, fiorenze) -> Jewel(fiorenze, nick))\nforall x (Jewel(x, nick) -> not Plop(nick, clarette))\nforall x (Crick(x, fiorenze) -> Crick(fiorenze, clarette))\n\nnot Jewel(fiorenze, nick)\n\nFusty(fiorenze) and forall x (Fusty(x) -> Jewel(x, fiorenze)) -> therefore Jewel(fiorenze, fiorenze) Jewel(fiorenze, fiorenze) and forall x (Jewel(x, fiorenze) -> Jewel(fiorenze, nick)) -> therefore Jewel(fiorenze, nick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The rhoda is matey. The buster pettifog the rhoda. The carter pettifog the buster. If someone is matey then they chase the rhoda. If someone is unrhymed then they do not chase the rhoda. If someone is stringent then they chase the buster. If someone is anaemic and they do not eat the rhoda then the rhoda does not see the buster. If the carter is anaemic then the carter pettifog the buster. If someone fear the rhoda then the rhoda fear the buster. If someone fear the buster then the buster does not see the carter. If someone pettifog the rhoda then the rhoda pettifog the carter. The buster does not see the carter.", "logic": "\nMatey(rhoda)\nPettifog(buster, rhoda)\nPettifog(carter, buster)\nforall x (Matey(x) -> Fear(x, rhoda))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) -> not Fear(x, rhoda))\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Fear(x, buster))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) and not Pettifog(x, rhoda) -> not Single(rhoda, buster))\nAnaemic(carter) -> Pettifog(carter, buster)\nforall x (Fear(x, rhoda) -> Fear(rhoda, buster))\nforall x (Fear(x, buster) -> not Single(buster, carter))\nforall x (Pettifog(x, rhoda) -> Pettifog(rhoda, carter))\n\nnot Single(buster, carter)\n\nMatey(rhoda) and forall x (Matey(x) -> Fear(x, rhoda)) -> therefore Fear(rhoda, rhoda) Fear(rhoda, rhoda) and forall x (Fear(x, rhoda) -> Fear(rhoda, buster)) -> therefore Fear(rhoda, buster) Fear(rhoda, buster) and forall x (Fear(x, buster) -> not Single(buster, carter)) -> therefore not Single(buster, carter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The shepard is unmeasured. The paula diversify the shepard. The brittney diversify the paula. If someone is unmeasured then they chase the shepard. If someone is aseptic then they do not chase the shepard. If someone is plentiful then they chase the paula. If someone is pictured and they do not eat the shepard then the shepard does not see the paula. If the brittney is pictured then the brittney diversify the paula. If someone worst the shepard then the shepard worst the paula. If someone worst the paula then the paula does not see the brittney. If someone diversify the shepard then the shepard diversify the brittney. The paula cloture the brittney.", "logic": "\nUnmeasured(shepard)\nDiversify(paula, shepard)\nDiversify(brittney, paula)\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) -> Worst(x, shepard))\nforall x (Aseptic(x) -> not Worst(x, shepard))\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> Worst(x, paula))\nforall x (Pictured(x) and not Diversify(x, shepard) -> not Cloture(shepard, paula))\nPictured(brittney) -> Diversify(brittney, paula)\nforall x (Worst(x, shepard) -> Worst(shepard, paula))\nforall x (Worst(x, paula) -> not Cloture(paula, brittney))\nforall x (Diversify(x, shepard) -> Diversify(shepard, brittney))\n\nCloture(paula, brittney)\n\nUnmeasured(shepard) and forall x (Unmeasured(x) -> Worst(x, shepard)) -> therefore Worst(shepard, shepard) Worst(shepard, shepard) and forall x (Worst(x, shepard) -> Worst(shepard, paula)) -> therefore Worst(shepard, paula) Worst(shepard, paula) and forall x (Worst(x, paula) -> not Cloture(paula, brittney)) -> therefore not Cloture(paula, brittney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The ola is exempt. The weylin cherish the ola. The cecilla cherish the weylin. If someone is exempt then they chase the ola. If someone is xxxiv then they do not chase the ola. If someone is sacerdotal then they chase the weylin. If someone is opalescent and they do not eat the ola then the ola does not see the weylin. If the cecilla is opalescent then the cecilla cherish the weylin. If someone waddle the ola then the ola waddle the weylin. If someone waddle the weylin then the weylin does not see the cecilla. If someone cherish the ola then the ola cherish the cecilla. The cecilla does not chase the ola.", "logic": "\nExempt(ola)\nCherish(weylin, ola)\nCherish(cecilla, weylin)\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Waddle(x, ola))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) -> not Waddle(x, ola))\nforall x (Sacerdotal(x) -> Waddle(x, weylin))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) and not Cherish(x, ola) -> not Tusk(ola, weylin))\nOpalescent(cecilla) -> Cherish(cecilla, weylin)\nforall x (Waddle(x, ola) -> Waddle(ola, weylin))\nforall x (Waddle(x, weylin) -> not Tusk(weylin, cecilla))\nforall x (Cherish(x, ola) -> Cherish(ola, cecilla))\n\nnot Waddle(cecilla, ola)\n\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Waddle(x, ola)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The fulton is unrimed. The corenda piffle the fulton. The shimon piffle the corenda. If someone is unrimed then they chase the fulton. If someone is missional then they do not chase the fulton. If someone is saved then they chase the corenda. If someone is metameric and they do not eat the fulton then the fulton does not see the corenda. If the shimon is metameric then the shimon piffle the corenda. If someone enmesh the fulton then the fulton enmesh the corenda. If someone enmesh the corenda then the corenda does not see the shimon. If someone piffle the fulton then the fulton piffle the shimon. The shimon enmesh the corenda.", "logic": "\nUnrimed(fulton)\nPiffle(corenda, fulton)\nPiffle(shimon, corenda)\nforall x (Unrimed(x) -> Enmesh(x, fulton))\nforall x (Missional(x) -> not Enmesh(x, fulton))\nforall x (Saved(x) -> Enmesh(x, corenda))\nforall x (Metameric(x) and not Piffle(x, fulton) -> not Spearhead(fulton, corenda))\nMetameric(shimon) -> Piffle(shimon, corenda)\nforall x (Enmesh(x, fulton) -> Enmesh(fulton, corenda))\nforall x (Enmesh(x, corenda) -> not Spearhead(corenda, shimon))\nforall x (Piffle(x, fulton) -> Piffle(fulton, shimon))\n\nEnmesh(shimon, corenda)\n\nforall x (Saved(x) -> Enmesh(x, corenda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The suzette is indicative. The emilio ferment the suzette. The karole ferment the emilio. If someone is indicative then they chase the suzette. If someone is envious then they do not chase the suzette. If someone is debonair then they chase the emilio. If someone is revokable and they do not eat the suzette then the suzette does not see the emilio. If the karole is revokable then the karole ferment the emilio. If someone denounce the suzette then the suzette denounce the emilio. If someone denounce the emilio then the emilio does not see the karole. If someone ferment the suzette then the suzette ferment the karole. The emilio does not chase the suzette.", "logic": "\nIndicative(suzette)\nFerment(emilio, suzette)\nFerment(karole, emilio)\nforall x (Indicative(x) -> Denounce(x, suzette))\nforall x (Envious(x) -> not Denounce(x, suzette))\nforall x (Debonair(x) -> Denounce(x, emilio))\nforall x (Revokable(x) and not Ferment(x, suzette) -> not Egress(suzette, emilio))\nRevokable(karole) -> Ferment(karole, emilio)\nforall x (Denounce(x, suzette) -> Denounce(suzette, emilio))\nforall x (Denounce(x, emilio) -> not Egress(emilio, karole))\nforall x (Ferment(x, suzette) -> Ferment(suzette, karole))\n\nnot Denounce(emilio, suzette)\n\nforall x (Indicative(x) -> Denounce(x, suzette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The henrik is pessimum. The derk clang the henrik. The gershon clang the derk. If someone is pessimum then they chase the henrik. If someone is chinked then they do not chase the henrik. If someone is indigenous then they chase the derk. If someone is rewardful and they do not eat the henrik then the henrik does not see the derk. If the gershon is rewardful then the gershon clang the derk. If someone omen the henrik then the henrik omen the derk. If someone omen the derk then the derk does not see the gershon. If someone clang the henrik then the henrik clang the gershon. The derk omen the derk.", "logic": "\nPessimum(henrik)\nClang(derk, henrik)\nClang(gershon, derk)\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Omen(x, henrik))\nforall x (Chinked(x) -> not Omen(x, henrik))\nforall x (Indigenous(x) -> Omen(x, derk))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) and not Clang(x, henrik) -> not Redact(henrik, derk))\nRewardful(gershon) -> Clang(gershon, derk)\nforall x (Omen(x, henrik) -> Omen(henrik, derk))\nforall x (Omen(x, derk) -> not Redact(derk, gershon))\nforall x (Clang(x, henrik) -> Clang(henrik, gershon))\n\nOmen(derk, derk)\n\nforall x (Indigenous(x) -> Omen(x, derk)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The sutton is capsulated. The sascha destain the sutton. The boniface destain the sascha. If someone is capsulated then they chase the sutton. If someone is netted then they do not chase the sutton. If someone is philistine then they chase the sascha. If someone is fruitless and they do not eat the sutton then the sutton does not see the sascha. If the boniface is fruitless then the boniface destain the sascha. If someone intersect the sutton then the sutton intersect the sascha. If someone intersect the sascha then the sascha does not see the boniface. If someone destain the sutton then the sutton destain the boniface. The boniface is not netted.", "logic": "\nCapsulated(sutton)\nDestain(sascha, sutton)\nDestain(boniface, sascha)\nforall x (Capsulated(x) -> Intersect(x, sutton))\nforall x (Netted(x) -> not Intersect(x, sutton))\nforall x (Philistine(x) -> Intersect(x, sascha))\nforall x (Fruitless(x) and not Destain(x, sutton) -> not Secure(sutton, sascha))\nFruitless(boniface) -> Destain(boniface, sascha)\nforall x (Intersect(x, sutton) -> Intersect(sutton, sascha))\nforall x (Intersect(x, sascha) -> not Secure(sascha, boniface))\nforall x (Destain(x, sutton) -> Destain(sutton, boniface))\n\nnot Netted(boniface)\n\nnot Netted(boniface) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The gloria is irritated. The cindee content the gloria. The wilt content the cindee. If someone is irritated then they chase the gloria. If someone is metallike then they do not chase the gloria. If someone is foul then they chase the cindee. If someone is exciting and they do not eat the gloria then the gloria does not see the cindee. If the wilt is exciting then the wilt content the cindee. If someone gown the gloria then the gloria gown the cindee. If someone gown the cindee then the cindee does not see the wilt. If someone content the gloria then the gloria content the wilt. The cindee chatter the cindee.", "logic": "\nIrritated(gloria)\nContent(cindee, gloria)\nContent(wilt, cindee)\nforall x (Irritated(x) -> Gown(x, gloria))\nforall x (Metallike(x) -> not Gown(x, gloria))\nforall x (Foul(x) -> Gown(x, cindee))\nforall x (Exciting(x) and not Content(x, gloria) -> not Chatter(gloria, cindee))\nExciting(wilt) -> Content(wilt, cindee)\nforall x (Gown(x, gloria) -> Gown(gloria, cindee))\nforall x (Gown(x, cindee) -> not Chatter(cindee, wilt))\nforall x (Content(x, gloria) -> Content(gloria, wilt))\n\nChatter(cindee, cindee)\n\nChatter(cindee, cindee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The tucky is lxxvii. The coriss love the tucky. The katherine love the coriss. If someone is lxxvii then they chase the tucky. If someone is gelid then they do not chase the tucky. If someone is solitary then they chase the coriss. If someone is cackly and they do not eat the tucky then the tucky does not see the coriss. If the katherine is cackly then the katherine love the coriss. If someone inflect the tucky then the tucky inflect the coriss. If someone inflect the coriss then the coriss does not see the katherine. If someone love the tucky then the tucky love the katherine. The katherine does not eat the katherine.", "logic": "\nLxxvii(tucky)\nLove(coriss, tucky)\nLove(katherine, coriss)\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Inflect(x, tucky))\nforall x (Gelid(x) -> not Inflect(x, tucky))\nforall x (Solitary(x) -> Inflect(x, coriss))\nforall x (Cackly(x) and not Love(x, tucky) -> not Consign(tucky, coriss))\nCackly(katherine) -> Love(katherine, coriss)\nforall x (Inflect(x, tucky) -> Inflect(tucky, coriss))\nforall x (Inflect(x, coriss) -> not Consign(coriss, katherine))\nforall x (Love(x, tucky) -> Love(tucky, katherine))\n\nnot Love(katherine, katherine)\n\nnot Love(katherine, katherine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The marilee is defendable. The corinna date the marilee. The tatiania date the corinna. If someone is defendable then they chase the marilee. If someone is nearby then they do not chase the marilee. If someone is cycloidal then they chase the corinna. If someone is spattered and they do not eat the marilee then the marilee does not see the corinna. If the tatiania is spattered then the tatiania date the corinna. If someone stymy the marilee then the marilee stymy the corinna. If someone stymy the corinna then the corinna does not see the tatiania. If someone date the marilee then the marilee date the tatiania. The corinna is round.", "logic": "\nDefendable(marilee)\nDate(corinna, marilee)\nDate(tatiania, corinna)\nforall x (Defendable(x) -> Stymy(x, marilee))\nforall x (Nearby(x) -> not Stymy(x, marilee))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) -> Stymy(x, corinna))\nforall x (Spattered(x) and not Date(x, marilee) -> not Sick(marilee, corinna))\nSpattered(tatiania) -> Date(tatiania, corinna)\nforall x (Stymy(x, marilee) -> Stymy(marilee, corinna))\nforall x (Stymy(x, corinna) -> not Sick(corinna, tatiania))\nforall x (Date(x, marilee) -> Date(marilee, tatiania))\n\nRound(corinna)\n\nRound(corinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The marthe is profuse. The marthe does not see the jae. The jae employ the marthe. If something employ the marthe and the marthe is matte then it deaf the jae. If something is profuse then it deaf the jae. If the jae is drippy and the jae deaf the marthe then the jae liquify the marthe. If the jae deaf the marthe then the jae is not extrusive. If something liquify the marthe and it deaf the jae then the marthe is roiled. If something deaf the jae then it deaf the marthe. If something deaf the marthe then it is matte. If something liquify the marthe and the marthe deaf the jae then it does not need the marthe. The marthe does not see the jae.", "logic": "\nProfuse(marthe)\nnot Liquify(marthe, jae)\nEmploy(jae, marthe)\nforall x (Employ(x, marthe) and Matte(marthe) -> Deaf(x, jae))\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Deaf(x, jae))\nDrippy(jae) and Deaf(jae, marthe) -> Liquify(jae, marthe)\nDeaf(jae, marthe) -> not Extrusive(jae)\nforall x (Liquify(x, marthe) and Deaf(x, jae) -> Roiled(marthe))\nforall x (Deaf(x, jae) -> Deaf(x, marthe))\nforall x (Deaf(x, marthe) -> Matte(x))\nforall x (Liquify(x, marthe) and Deaf(marthe, jae) -> not Employ(x, marthe))\n\nnot Liquify(marthe, jae)\n\ntherefore not Liquify(marthe, jae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The larisa is wagnerian. The larisa does not see the renie. The renie exorcise the larisa. If something exorcise the larisa and the larisa is cyclonal then it diss the renie. If something is wagnerian then it diss the renie. If the renie is flagellate and the renie diss the larisa then the renie repent the larisa. If the renie diss the larisa then the renie is not certified. If something repent the larisa and it diss the renie then the larisa is spotty. If something diss the renie then it diss the larisa. If something diss the larisa then it is cyclonal. If something repent the larisa and the larisa diss the renie then it does not need the larisa. The larisa is not wagnerian.", "logic": "\nWagnerian(larisa)\nnot Repent(larisa, renie)\nExorcise(renie, larisa)\nforall x (Exorcise(x, larisa) and Cyclonal(larisa) -> Diss(x, renie))\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) -> Diss(x, renie))\nFlagellate(renie) and Diss(renie, larisa) -> Repent(renie, larisa)\nDiss(renie, larisa) -> not Certified(renie)\nforall x (Repent(x, larisa) and Diss(x, renie) -> Spotty(larisa))\nforall x (Diss(x, renie) -> Diss(x, larisa))\nforall x (Diss(x, larisa) -> Cyclonal(x))\nforall x (Repent(x, larisa) and Diss(larisa, renie) -> not Exorcise(x, larisa))\n\nnot Wagnerian(larisa)\n\ntherefore Wagnerian(larisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The osmond is vacuolated. The osmond does not see the jemmie. The jemmie knuckle the osmond. If something knuckle the osmond and the osmond is renowned then it oppugn the jemmie. If something is vacuolated then it oppugn the jemmie. If the jemmie is outmost and the jemmie oppugn the osmond then the jemmie adulterate the osmond. If the jemmie oppugn the osmond then the jemmie is not indulgent. If something adulterate the osmond and it oppugn the jemmie then the osmond is capitulary. If something oppugn the jemmie then it oppugn the osmond. If something oppugn the osmond then it is renowned. If something adulterate the osmond and the osmond oppugn the jemmie then it does not need the osmond. The osmond oppugn the jemmie.", "logic": "\nVacuolated(osmond)\nnot Adulterate(osmond, jemmie)\nKnuckle(jemmie, osmond)\nforall x (Knuckle(x, osmond) and Renowned(osmond) -> Oppugn(x, jemmie))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Oppugn(x, jemmie))\nOutmost(jemmie) and Oppugn(jemmie, osmond) -> Adulterate(jemmie, osmond)\nOppugn(jemmie, osmond) -> not Indulgent(jemmie)\nforall x (Adulterate(x, osmond) and Oppugn(x, jemmie) -> Capitulary(osmond))\nforall x (Oppugn(x, jemmie) -> Oppugn(x, osmond))\nforall x (Oppugn(x, osmond) -> Renowned(x))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, osmond) and Oppugn(osmond, jemmie) -> not Knuckle(x, osmond))\n\nOppugn(osmond, jemmie)\n\nVacuolated(osmond) and forall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Oppugn(x, jemmie)) -> therefore Oppugn(osmond, jemmie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The sidney is racist. The sidney does not see the harvard. The harvard sodomize the sidney. If something sodomize the sidney and the sidney is tigerish then it unplug the harvard. If something is racist then it unplug the harvard. If the harvard is diabolic and the harvard unplug the sidney then the harvard trundle the sidney. If the harvard unplug the sidney then the harvard is not moronic. If something trundle the sidney and it unplug the harvard then the sidney is echt. If something unplug the harvard then it unplug the sidney. If something unplug the sidney then it is tigerish. If something trundle the sidney and the sidney unplug the harvard then it does not need the sidney. The sidney does not chase the harvard.", "logic": "\nRacist(sidney)\nnot Trundle(sidney, harvard)\nSodomize(harvard, sidney)\nforall x (Sodomize(x, sidney) and Tigerish(sidney) -> Unplug(x, harvard))\nforall x (Racist(x) -> Unplug(x, harvard))\nDiabolic(harvard) and Unplug(harvard, sidney) -> Trundle(harvard, sidney)\nUnplug(harvard, sidney) -> not Moronic(harvard)\nforall x (Trundle(x, sidney) and Unplug(x, harvard) -> Echt(sidney))\nforall x (Unplug(x, harvard) -> Unplug(x, sidney))\nforall x (Unplug(x, sidney) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Trundle(x, sidney) and Unplug(sidney, harvard) -> not Sodomize(x, sidney))\n\nnot Unplug(sidney, harvard)\n\nRacist(sidney) and forall x (Racist(x) -> Unplug(x, harvard)) -> therefore Unplug(sidney, harvard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The ketty is annoyed. The ketty does not see the cass. The cass woolgather the ketty. If something woolgather the ketty and the ketty is unkept then it rumple the cass. If something is annoyed then it rumple the cass. If the cass is umber and the cass rumple the ketty then the cass hunker the ketty. If the cass rumple the ketty then the cass is not reddish. If something hunker the ketty and it rumple the cass then the ketty is monodical. If something rumple the cass then it rumple the ketty. If something rumple the ketty then it is unkept. If something hunker the ketty and the ketty rumple the cass then it does not need the ketty. The ketty rumple the ketty.", "logic": "\nAnnoyed(ketty)\nnot Hunker(ketty, cass)\nWoolgather(cass, ketty)\nforall x (Woolgather(x, ketty) and Unkept(ketty) -> Rumple(x, cass))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Rumple(x, cass))\nUmber(cass) and Rumple(cass, ketty) -> Hunker(cass, ketty)\nRumple(cass, ketty) -> not Reddish(cass)\nforall x (Hunker(x, ketty) and Rumple(x, cass) -> Monodical(ketty))\nforall x (Rumple(x, cass) -> Rumple(x, ketty))\nforall x (Rumple(x, ketty) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Hunker(x, ketty) and Rumple(ketty, cass) -> not Woolgather(x, ketty))\n\nRumple(ketty, ketty)\n\nAnnoyed(ketty) and forall x (Annoyed(x) -> Rumple(x, cass)) -> therefore Rumple(ketty, cass) Rumple(ketty, cass) and forall x (Rumple(x, cass) -> Rumple(x, ketty)) -> therefore Rumple(ketty, ketty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The rubin is cerous. The rubin does not see the aldo. The aldo revert the rubin. If something revert the rubin and the rubin is ferrous then it polemize the aldo. If something is cerous then it polemize the aldo. If the aldo is windy and the aldo polemize the rubin then the aldo disregard the rubin. If the aldo polemize the rubin then the aldo is not courteous. If something disregard the rubin and it polemize the aldo then the rubin is unsolved. If something polemize the aldo then it polemize the rubin. If something polemize the rubin then it is ferrous. If something disregard the rubin and the rubin polemize the aldo then it does not need the rubin. The rubin does not chase the rubin.", "logic": "\nCerous(rubin)\nnot Disregard(rubin, aldo)\nRevert(aldo, rubin)\nforall x (Revert(x, rubin) and Ferrous(rubin) -> Polemize(x, aldo))\nforall x (Cerous(x) -> Polemize(x, aldo))\nWindy(aldo) and Polemize(aldo, rubin) -> Disregard(aldo, rubin)\nPolemize(aldo, rubin) -> not Courteous(aldo)\nforall x (Disregard(x, rubin) and Polemize(x, aldo) -> Unsolved(rubin))\nforall x (Polemize(x, aldo) -> Polemize(x, rubin))\nforall x (Polemize(x, rubin) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Disregard(x, rubin) and Polemize(rubin, aldo) -> not Revert(x, rubin))\n\nnot Polemize(rubin, rubin)\n\nCerous(rubin) and forall x (Cerous(x) -> Polemize(x, aldo)) -> therefore Polemize(rubin, aldo) Polemize(rubin, aldo) and forall x (Polemize(x, aldo) -> Polemize(x, rubin)) -> therefore Polemize(rubin, rubin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The selig is nettled. The selig does not see the veronica. The veronica phrase the selig. If something phrase the selig and the selig is unrouged then it absolve the veronica. If something is nettled then it absolve the veronica. If the veronica is indecorous and the veronica absolve the selig then the veronica complicate the selig. If the veronica absolve the selig then the veronica is not ascendent. If something complicate the selig and it absolve the veronica then the selig is deweyan. If something absolve the veronica then it absolve the selig. If something absolve the selig then it is unrouged. If something complicate the selig and the selig absolve the veronica then it does not need the selig. The selig is unrouged.", "logic": "\nNettled(selig)\nnot Complicate(selig, veronica)\nPhrase(veronica, selig)\nforall x (Phrase(x, selig) and Unrouged(selig) -> Absolve(x, veronica))\nforall x (Nettled(x) -> Absolve(x, veronica))\nIndecorous(veronica) and Absolve(veronica, selig) -> Complicate(veronica, selig)\nAbsolve(veronica, selig) -> not Ascendent(veronica)\nforall x (Complicate(x, selig) and Absolve(x, veronica) -> Deweyan(selig))\nforall x (Absolve(x, veronica) -> Absolve(x, selig))\nforall x (Absolve(x, selig) -> Unrouged(x))\nforall x (Complicate(x, selig) and Absolve(selig, veronica) -> not Phrase(x, selig))\n\nUnrouged(selig)\n\nNettled(selig) and forall x (Nettled(x) -> Absolve(x, veronica)) -> therefore Absolve(selig, veronica) Absolve(selig, veronica) and forall x (Absolve(x, veronica) -> Absolve(x, selig)) -> therefore Absolve(selig, selig) Absolve(selig, selig) and forall x (Absolve(x, selig) -> Unrouged(x)) -> therefore Unrouged(selig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The glorianna is amusing. The glorianna does not see the hortense. The hortense depreciate the glorianna. If something depreciate the glorianna and the glorianna is doddery then it spume the hortense. If something is amusing then it spume the hortense. If the hortense is doting and the hortense spume the glorianna then the hortense suture the glorianna. If the hortense spume the glorianna then the hortense is not rarefied. If something suture the glorianna and it spume the hortense then the glorianna is parented. If something spume the hortense then it spume the glorianna. If something spume the glorianna then it is doddery. If something suture the glorianna and the glorianna spume the hortense then it does not need the glorianna. The glorianna is not doddery.", "logic": "\nAmusing(glorianna)\nnot Suture(glorianna, hortense)\nDepreciate(hortense, glorianna)\nforall x (Depreciate(x, glorianna) and Doddery(glorianna) -> Spume(x, hortense))\nforall x (Amusing(x) -> Spume(x, hortense))\nDoting(hortense) and Spume(hortense, glorianna) -> Suture(hortense, glorianna)\nSpume(hortense, glorianna) -> not Rarefied(hortense)\nforall x (Suture(x, glorianna) and Spume(x, hortense) -> Parented(glorianna))\nforall x (Spume(x, hortense) -> Spume(x, glorianna))\nforall x (Spume(x, glorianna) -> Doddery(x))\nforall x (Suture(x, glorianna) and Spume(glorianna, hortense) -> not Depreciate(x, glorianna))\n\nnot Doddery(glorianna)\n\nAmusing(glorianna) and forall x (Amusing(x) -> Spume(x, hortense)) -> therefore Spume(glorianna, hortense) Spume(glorianna, hortense) and forall x (Spume(x, hortense) -> Spume(x, glorianna)) -> therefore Spume(glorianna, glorianna) Spume(glorianna, glorianna) and forall x (Spume(x, glorianna) -> Doddery(x)) -> therefore Doddery(glorianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The trixie is broke. The trixie does not see the maya. The maya harpoon the trixie. If something harpoon the trixie and the trixie is least then it terrasse the maya. If something is broke then it terrasse the maya. If the maya is utopian and the maya terrasse the trixie then the maya mishandle the trixie. If the maya terrasse the trixie then the maya is not booked. If something mishandle the trixie and it terrasse the maya then the trixie is sightly. If something terrasse the maya then it terrasse the trixie. If something terrasse the trixie then it is least. If something mishandle the trixie and the trixie terrasse the maya then it does not need the trixie. The trixie is not sightly.", "logic": "\nBroke(trixie)\nnot Mishandle(trixie, maya)\nHarpoon(maya, trixie)\nforall x (Harpoon(x, trixie) and Least(trixie) -> Terrasse(x, maya))\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Terrasse(x, maya))\nUtopian(maya) and Terrasse(maya, trixie) -> Mishandle(maya, trixie)\nTerrasse(maya, trixie) -> not Booked(maya)\nforall x (Mishandle(x, trixie) and Terrasse(x, maya) -> Sightly(trixie))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, maya) -> Terrasse(x, trixie))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, trixie) -> Least(x))\nforall x (Mishandle(x, trixie) and Terrasse(trixie, maya) -> not Harpoon(x, trixie))\n\nnot Sightly(trixie)\n\nforall x (Mishandle(x, trixie) and Terrasse(x, maya) -> Sightly(trixie)) <- Utopian(maya) and Terrasse(maya, trixie) -> Mishandle(maya, trixie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The lincoln is modulated. The lincoln does not see the osbourne. The osbourne crust the lincoln. If something crust the lincoln and the lincoln is exigent then it blear the osbourne. If something is modulated then it blear the osbourne. If the osbourne is modal and the osbourne blear the lincoln then the osbourne beetle the lincoln. If the osbourne blear the lincoln then the osbourne is not despotic. If something beetle the lincoln and it blear the osbourne then the lincoln is wedded. If something blear the osbourne then it blear the lincoln. If something blear the lincoln then it is exigent. If something beetle the lincoln and the lincoln blear the osbourne then it does not need the lincoln. The osbourne beetle the lincoln.", "logic": "\nModulated(lincoln)\nnot Beetle(lincoln, osbourne)\nCrust(osbourne, lincoln)\nforall x (Crust(x, lincoln) and Exigent(lincoln) -> Blear(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Modulated(x) -> Blear(x, osbourne))\nModal(osbourne) and Blear(osbourne, lincoln) -> Beetle(osbourne, lincoln)\nBlear(osbourne, lincoln) -> not Despotic(osbourne)\nforall x (Beetle(x, lincoln) and Blear(x, osbourne) -> Wedded(lincoln))\nforall x (Blear(x, osbourne) -> Blear(x, lincoln))\nforall x (Blear(x, lincoln) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x, lincoln) and Blear(lincoln, osbourne) -> not Crust(x, lincoln))\n\nBeetle(osbourne, lincoln)\n\nModal(osbourne) and Blear(osbourne, lincoln) -> Beetle(osbourne, lincoln) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The marlyn is stooping. The marlyn does not see the arvin. The arvin osculate the marlyn. If something osculate the marlyn and the marlyn is winless then it exchange the arvin. If something is stooping then it exchange the arvin. If the arvin is central and the arvin exchange the marlyn then the arvin wring the marlyn. If the arvin exchange the marlyn then the arvin is not synergetic. If something wring the marlyn and it exchange the arvin then the marlyn is spavined. If something exchange the arvin then it exchange the marlyn. If something exchange the marlyn then it is winless. If something wring the marlyn and the marlyn exchange the arvin then it does not need the marlyn. The arvin is not central.", "logic": "\nStooping(marlyn)\nnot Wring(marlyn, arvin)\nOsculate(arvin, marlyn)\nforall x (Osculate(x, marlyn) and Winless(marlyn) -> Exchange(x, arvin))\nforall x (Stooping(x) -> Exchange(x, arvin))\nCentral(arvin) and Exchange(arvin, marlyn) -> Wring(arvin, marlyn)\nExchange(arvin, marlyn) -> not Synergetic(arvin)\nforall x (Wring(x, marlyn) and Exchange(x, arvin) -> Spavined(marlyn))\nforall x (Exchange(x, arvin) -> Exchange(x, marlyn))\nforall x (Exchange(x, marlyn) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Wring(x, marlyn) and Exchange(marlyn, arvin) -> not Osculate(x, marlyn))\n\nnot Central(arvin)\n\nnot Central(arvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The aeriell is registered. The aeriell does not see the tarah. The tarah redden the aeriell. If something redden the aeriell and the aeriell is boyish then it garotte the tarah. If something is registered then it garotte the tarah. If the tarah is vestmented and the tarah garotte the aeriell then the tarah enroll the aeriell. If the tarah garotte the aeriell then the tarah is not bewitched. If something enroll the aeriell and it garotte the tarah then the aeriell is pubescent. If something garotte the tarah then it garotte the aeriell. If something garotte the aeriell then it is boyish. If something enroll the aeriell and the aeriell garotte the tarah then it does not need the aeriell. The aeriell redden the tarah.", "logic": "\nRegistered(aeriell)\nnot Enroll(aeriell, tarah)\nRedden(tarah, aeriell)\nforall x (Redden(x, aeriell) and Boyish(aeriell) -> Garotte(x, tarah))\nforall x (Registered(x) -> Garotte(x, tarah))\nVestmented(tarah) and Garotte(tarah, aeriell) -> Enroll(tarah, aeriell)\nGarotte(tarah, aeriell) -> not Bewitched(tarah)\nforall x (Enroll(x, aeriell) and Garotte(x, tarah) -> Pubescent(aeriell))\nforall x (Garotte(x, tarah) -> Garotte(x, aeriell))\nforall x (Garotte(x, aeriell) -> Boyish(x))\nforall x (Enroll(x, aeriell) and Garotte(aeriell, tarah) -> not Redden(x, aeriell))\n\nRedden(aeriell, tarah)\n\nRedden(aeriell, tarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The marnie is intoxicant. The marnie does not see the stanwood. The stanwood recognize the marnie. If something recognize the marnie and the marnie is bullying then it soar the stanwood. If something is intoxicant then it soar the stanwood. If the stanwood is sparing and the stanwood soar the marnie then the stanwood collocate the marnie. If the stanwood soar the marnie then the stanwood is not petulant. If something collocate the marnie and it soar the stanwood then the marnie is assumed. If something soar the stanwood then it soar the marnie. If something soar the marnie then it is bullying. If something collocate the marnie and the marnie soar the stanwood then it does not need the marnie. The marnie does not need the marnie.", "logic": "\nIntoxicant(marnie)\nnot Collocate(marnie, stanwood)\nRecognize(stanwood, marnie)\nforall x (Recognize(x, marnie) and Bullying(marnie) -> Soar(x, stanwood))\nforall x (Intoxicant(x) -> Soar(x, stanwood))\nSparing(stanwood) and Soar(stanwood, marnie) -> Collocate(stanwood, marnie)\nSoar(stanwood, marnie) -> not Petulant(stanwood)\nforall x (Collocate(x, marnie) and Soar(x, stanwood) -> Assumed(marnie))\nforall x (Soar(x, stanwood) -> Soar(x, marnie))\nforall x (Soar(x, marnie) -> Bullying(x))\nforall x (Collocate(x, marnie) and Soar(marnie, stanwood) -> not Recognize(x, marnie))\n\nnot Recognize(marnie, marnie)\n\nnot Recognize(marnie, marnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The cheston is damned. The cheston does not see the dara. The dara amaze the cheston. If something amaze the cheston and the cheston is aphaeretic then it metal the dara. If something is damned then it metal the dara. If the dara is dismantled and the dara metal the cheston then the dara cramp the cheston. If the dara metal the cheston then the dara is not animated. If something cramp the cheston and it metal the dara then the cheston is unerring. If something metal the dara then it metal the cheston. If something metal the cheston then it is aphaeretic. If something cramp the cheston and the cheston metal the dara then it does not need the cheston. The dara cramp the dara.", "logic": "\nDamned(cheston)\nnot Cramp(cheston, dara)\nAmaze(dara, cheston)\nforall x (Amaze(x, cheston) and Aphaeretic(cheston) -> Metal(x, dara))\nforall x (Damned(x) -> Metal(x, dara))\nDismantled(dara) and Metal(dara, cheston) -> Cramp(dara, cheston)\nMetal(dara, cheston) -> not Animated(dara)\nforall x (Cramp(x, cheston) and Metal(x, dara) -> Unerring(cheston))\nforall x (Metal(x, dara) -> Metal(x, cheston))\nforall x (Metal(x, cheston) -> Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Cramp(x, cheston) and Metal(cheston, dara) -> not Amaze(x, cheston))\n\nCramp(dara, dara)\n\nCramp(dara, dara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The jud is eidetic. The jud does not see the dorit. The dorit incase the jud. If something incase the jud and the jud is unripened then it decimate the dorit. If something is eidetic then it decimate the dorit. If the dorit is peevish and the dorit decimate the jud then the dorit dehumidify the jud. If the dorit decimate the jud then the dorit is not unpowered. If something dehumidify the jud and it decimate the dorit then the jud is sorrel. If something decimate the dorit then it decimate the jud. If something decimate the jud then it is unripened. If something dehumidify the jud and the jud decimate the dorit then it does not need the jud. The jud does not see the jud.", "logic": "\nEidetic(jud)\nnot Dehumidify(jud, dorit)\nIncase(dorit, jud)\nforall x (Incase(x, jud) and Unripened(jud) -> Decimate(x, dorit))\nforall x (Eidetic(x) -> Decimate(x, dorit))\nPeevish(dorit) and Decimate(dorit, jud) -> Dehumidify(dorit, jud)\nDecimate(dorit, jud) -> not Unpowered(dorit)\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, jud) and Decimate(x, dorit) -> Sorrel(jud))\nforall x (Decimate(x, dorit) -> Decimate(x, jud))\nforall x (Decimate(x, jud) -> Unripened(x))\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, jud) and Decimate(jud, dorit) -> not Incase(x, jud))\n\nnot Dehumidify(jud, jud)\n\nnot Dehumidify(jud, jud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The darya is obovate. The darya does not see the clarisa. The clarisa kill the darya. If something kill the darya and the darya is knotted then it spur the clarisa. If something is obovate then it spur the clarisa. If the clarisa is racial and the clarisa spur the darya then the clarisa sizzle the darya. If the clarisa spur the darya then the clarisa is not coming. If something sizzle the darya and it spur the clarisa then the darya is gullible. If something spur the clarisa then it spur the darya. If something spur the darya then it is knotted. If something sizzle the darya and the darya spur the clarisa then it does not need the darya. The clarisa is gullible.", "logic": "\nObovate(darya)\nnot Sizzle(darya, clarisa)\nKill(clarisa, darya)\nforall x (Kill(x, darya) and Knotted(darya) -> Spur(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Obovate(x) -> Spur(x, clarisa))\nRacial(clarisa) and Spur(clarisa, darya) -> Sizzle(clarisa, darya)\nSpur(clarisa, darya) -> not Coming(clarisa)\nforall x (Sizzle(x, darya) and Spur(x, clarisa) -> Gullible(darya))\nforall x (Spur(x, clarisa) -> Spur(x, darya))\nforall x (Spur(x, darya) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Sizzle(x, darya) and Spur(darya, clarisa) -> not Kill(x, darya))\n\nGullible(clarisa)\n\nGullible(clarisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "Mauricio is nosey. If Mauricio is excursive then Mauricio is inanimate. Big things are excursive. If Mauricio is nosey then Mauricio is taxpaying. Round things are inharmonic. All nosey, inanimate things are inharmonic. Smart things are nosey. Mauricio is nosey.", "logic": "\nNosey(mauricio)\nExcursive(mauricio) -> Inanimate(mauricio)\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Excursive(x))\nNosey(mauricio) -> Taxpaying(mauricio)\nforall x (Handheld(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) and Inanimate(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\nforall x (Inanimate(x) -> Nosey(x))\n\nNosey(mauricio)\n\ntherefore Nosey(mauricio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Louisette is gladdened. If Louisette is abashed then Louisette is tuppeny. Big things are abashed. If Louisette is gladdened then Louisette is autosomal. Round things are asocial. All gladdened, tuppeny things are asocial. Smart things are gladdened. Louisette is not gladdened.", "logic": "\nGladdened(louisette)\nAbashed(louisette) -> Tuppeny(louisette)\nforall x (Autosomal(x) -> Abashed(x))\nGladdened(louisette) -> Autosomal(louisette)\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) -> Asocial(x))\nforall x (Gladdened(x) and Tuppeny(x) -> Asocial(x))\nforall x (Tuppeny(x) -> Gladdened(x))\n\nnot Gladdened(louisette)\n\ntherefore Gladdened(louisette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Windy is soviet. If Windy is stimulant then Windy is wondrous. Big things are stimulant. If Windy is soviet then Windy is auricular. Round things are human. All soviet, wondrous things are human. Smart things are soviet. Windy is auricular.", "logic": "\nSoviet(windy)\nStimulant(windy) -> Wondrous(windy)\nforall x (Auricular(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nSoviet(windy) -> Auricular(windy)\nforall x (Sturdy(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Soviet(x) and Wondrous(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Soviet(x))\n\nAuricular(windy)\n\nSoviet(windy) and Soviet(windy) -> Auricular(windy) -> therefore Auricular(windy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Joshua is auriferous. If Joshua is hopeless then Joshua is unmeasured. Big things are hopeless. If Joshua is auriferous then Joshua is unbranded. Round things are connective. All auriferous, unmeasured things are connective. Smart things are auriferous. Joshua is not unbranded.", "logic": "\nAuriferous(joshua)\nHopeless(joshua) -> Unmeasured(joshua)\nforall x (Unbranded(x) -> Hopeless(x))\nAuriferous(joshua) -> Unbranded(joshua)\nforall x (Blunt(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) and Unmeasured(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) -> Auriferous(x))\n\nnot Unbranded(joshua)\n\nAuriferous(joshua) and Auriferous(joshua) -> Unbranded(joshua) -> therefore Unbranded(joshua)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Marielle is quality. If Marielle is acoustical then Marielle is vaginal. Big things are acoustical. If Marielle is quality then Marielle is cankerous. Round things are ulcerated. All quality, vaginal things are ulcerated. Smart things are quality. Marielle is acoustical.", "logic": "\nQuality(marielle)\nAcoustical(marielle) -> Vaginal(marielle)\nforall x (Cankerous(x) -> Acoustical(x))\nQuality(marielle) -> Cankerous(marielle)\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\nforall x (Quality(x) and Vaginal(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\nforall x (Vaginal(x) -> Quality(x))\n\nAcoustical(marielle)\n\nQuality(marielle) and Quality(marielle) -> Cankerous(marielle) -> therefore Cankerous(marielle) Cankerous(marielle) and forall x (Cankerous(x) -> Acoustical(x)) -> therefore Acoustical(marielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Charlotte is scornful. If Charlotte is tidal then Charlotte is holozoic. Big things are tidal. If Charlotte is scornful then Charlotte is advertent. Round things are unmade. All scornful, holozoic things are unmade. Smart things are scornful. Charlotte is not tidal.", "logic": "\nScornful(charlotte)\nTidal(charlotte) -> Holozoic(charlotte)\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> Tidal(x))\nScornful(charlotte) -> Advertent(charlotte)\nforall x (Priestly(x) -> Unmade(x))\nforall x (Scornful(x) and Holozoic(x) -> Unmade(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Scornful(x))\n\nnot Tidal(charlotte)\n\nScornful(charlotte) and Scornful(charlotte) -> Advertent(charlotte) -> therefore Advertent(charlotte) Advertent(charlotte) and forall x (Advertent(x) -> Tidal(x)) -> therefore Tidal(charlotte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Sissy is depilous. If Sissy is ciliate then Sissy is pleochroic. Big things are ciliate. If Sissy is depilous then Sissy is aslant. Round things are caring. All depilous, pleochroic things are caring. Smart things are depilous. Sissy is pleochroic.", "logic": "\nDepilous(sissy)\nCiliate(sissy) -> Pleochroic(sissy)\nforall x (Aslant(x) -> Ciliate(x))\nDepilous(sissy) -> Aslant(sissy)\nforall x (Myalgic(x) -> Caring(x))\nforall x (Depilous(x) and Pleochroic(x) -> Caring(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) -> Depilous(x))\n\nPleochroic(sissy)\n\nDepilous(sissy) and Depilous(sissy) -> Aslant(sissy) -> therefore Aslant(sissy) Aslant(sissy) and forall x (Aslant(x) -> Ciliate(x)) -> therefore Ciliate(sissy) Ciliate(sissy) and Ciliate(sissy) -> Pleochroic(sissy) -> therefore Pleochroic(sissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Laurance is hottish. If Laurance is global then Laurance is tractable. Big things are global. If Laurance is hottish then Laurance is innumerous. Round things are diclinous. All hottish, tractable things are diclinous. Smart things are hottish. Laurance is not tractable.", "logic": "\nHottish(laurance)\nGlobal(laurance) -> Tractable(laurance)\nforall x (Innumerous(x) -> Global(x))\nHottish(laurance) -> Innumerous(laurance)\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Hottish(x) and Tractable(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Tractable(x) -> Hottish(x))\n\nnot Tractable(laurance)\n\nHottish(laurance) and Hottish(laurance) -> Innumerous(laurance) -> therefore Innumerous(laurance) Innumerous(laurance) and forall x (Innumerous(x) -> Global(x)) -> therefore Global(laurance) Global(laurance) and Global(laurance) -> Tractable(laurance) -> therefore Tractable(laurance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Leah is emollient. If Leah is undisputed then Leah is bandy. Big things are undisputed. If Leah is emollient then Leah is potential. Round things are impeccant. All emollient, bandy things are impeccant. Smart things are emollient. Leah is not faceted.", "logic": "\nEmollient(leah)\nUndisputed(leah) -> Bandy(leah)\nforall x (Potential(x) -> Undisputed(x))\nEmollient(leah) -> Potential(leah)\nforall x (Faceted(x) -> Impeccant(x))\nforall x (Emollient(x) and Bandy(x) -> Impeccant(x))\nforall x (Bandy(x) -> Emollient(x))\n\nnot Faceted(leah)\n\nnot Faceted(leah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Joya is wriggly. If Joya is ochre then Joya is acetous. Big things are ochre. If Joya is wriggly then Joya is bookable. Round things are abused. All wriggly, acetous things are abused. Smart things are wriggly. Joya is cold.", "logic": "\nWriggly(joya)\nOchre(joya) -> Acetous(joya)\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Ochre(x))\nWriggly(joya) -> Bookable(joya)\nforall x (Borated(x) -> Abused(x))\nforall x (Wriggly(x) and Acetous(x) -> Abused(x))\nforall x (Acetous(x) -> Wriggly(x))\n\nCold(joya)\n\nCold(joya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "The dorelle is lousy. If something is anisogamic and brassbound then it is not unspotted. All brassbound things are anisogamic. If something is anisogamic and not lousy then it is not brassbound. If something is lousy then it is brassbound. All lousy things are brassbound. If the dorelle is not timid then the dorelle is anisogamic. If the dorelle is not lousy then the dorelle is anisogamic. If the dorelle is anisogamic and the dorelle is brassbound then the dorelle is not unspotted. The dorelle is lousy.", "logic": "\nLousy(dorelle)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Brassbound(x) -> not Unspotted(x))\nforall x (Brassbound(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and not Lousy(x) -> not Brassbound(x))\nforall x (Lousy(x) -> Brassbound(x))\nforall x (Lousy(x) -> Brassbound(x))\nnot Timid(dorelle) -> Anisogamic(dorelle)\nnot Lousy(dorelle) -> Anisogamic(dorelle)\nAnisogamic(dorelle) and Brassbound(dorelle) -> not Unspotted(dorelle)\n\nLousy(dorelle)\n\ntherefore Lousy(dorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The vina is regulated. If something is donnian and ingenuous then it is not none. All ingenuous things are donnian. If something is donnian and not regulated then it is not ingenuous. If something is regulated then it is ingenuous. All regulated things are ingenuous. If the vina is not sown then the vina is donnian. If the vina is not regulated then the vina is donnian. If the vina is donnian and the vina is ingenuous then the vina is not none. The vina is not regulated.", "logic": "\nRegulated(vina)\nforall x (Donnian(x) and Ingenuous(x) -> not None(x))\nforall x (Ingenuous(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Donnian(x) and not Regulated(x) -> not Ingenuous(x))\nforall x (Regulated(x) -> Ingenuous(x))\nforall x (Regulated(x) -> Ingenuous(x))\nnot Sown(vina) -> Donnian(vina)\nnot Regulated(vina) -> Donnian(vina)\nDonnian(vina) and Ingenuous(vina) -> not None(vina)\n\nnot Regulated(vina)\n\ntherefore Regulated(vina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The isaak is nasal. If something is teeny and sunburnt then it is not tubelike. All sunburnt things are teeny. If something is teeny and not nasal then it is not sunburnt. If something is nasal then it is sunburnt. All nasal things are sunburnt. If the isaak is not distrait then the isaak is teeny. If the isaak is not nasal then the isaak is teeny. If the isaak is teeny and the isaak is sunburnt then the isaak is not tubelike. The isaak is sunburnt.", "logic": "\nNasal(isaak)\nforall x (Teeny(x) and Sunburnt(x) -> not Tubelike(x))\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Teeny(x))\nforall x (Teeny(x) and not Nasal(x) -> not Sunburnt(x))\nforall x (Nasal(x) -> Sunburnt(x))\nforall x (Nasal(x) -> Sunburnt(x))\nnot Distrait(isaak) -> Teeny(isaak)\nnot Nasal(isaak) -> Teeny(isaak)\nTeeny(isaak) and Sunburnt(isaak) -> not Tubelike(isaak)\n\nSunburnt(isaak)\n\nNasal(isaak) and forall x (Nasal(x) -> Sunburnt(x)) -> therefore Sunburnt(isaak)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The felicia is resonant. If something is partisan and synaptic then it is not shelled. All synaptic things are partisan. If something is partisan and not resonant then it is not synaptic. If something is resonant then it is synaptic. All resonant things are synaptic. If the felicia is not retrorse then the felicia is partisan. If the felicia is not resonant then the felicia is partisan. If the felicia is partisan and the felicia is synaptic then the felicia is not shelled. The felicia is not synaptic.", "logic": "\nResonant(felicia)\nforall x (Partisan(x) and Synaptic(x) -> not Shelled(x))\nforall x (Synaptic(x) -> Partisan(x))\nforall x (Partisan(x) and not Resonant(x) -> not Synaptic(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Synaptic(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Synaptic(x))\nnot Retrorse(felicia) -> Partisan(felicia)\nnot Resonant(felicia) -> Partisan(felicia)\nPartisan(felicia) and Synaptic(felicia) -> not Shelled(felicia)\n\nnot Synaptic(felicia)\n\nResonant(felicia) and forall x (Resonant(x) -> Synaptic(x)) -> therefore Synaptic(felicia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The gipsy is dear. If something is epidural and shrieked then it is not suboceanic. All shrieked things are epidural. If something is epidural and not dear then it is not shrieked. If something is dear then it is shrieked. All dear things are shrieked. If the gipsy is not pampering then the gipsy is epidural. If the gipsy is not dear then the gipsy is epidural. If the gipsy is epidural and the gipsy is shrieked then the gipsy is not suboceanic. The gipsy is epidural.", "logic": "\nDear(gipsy)\nforall x (Epidural(x) and Shrieked(x) -> not Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Shrieked(x) -> Epidural(x))\nforall x (Epidural(x) and not Dear(x) -> not Shrieked(x))\nforall x (Dear(x) -> Shrieked(x))\nforall x (Dear(x) -> Shrieked(x))\nnot Pampering(gipsy) -> Epidural(gipsy)\nnot Dear(gipsy) -> Epidural(gipsy)\nEpidural(gipsy) and Shrieked(gipsy) -> not Suboceanic(gipsy)\n\nEpidural(gipsy)\n\nDear(gipsy) and forall x (Dear(x) -> Shrieked(x)) -> therefore Shrieked(gipsy) Shrieked(gipsy) and forall x (Shrieked(x) -> Epidural(x)) -> therefore Epidural(gipsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The clemente is afoul. If something is gloved and surplus then it is not utterable. All surplus things are gloved. If something is gloved and not afoul then it is not surplus. If something is afoul then it is surplus. All afoul things are surplus. If the clemente is not aligned then the clemente is gloved. If the clemente is not afoul then the clemente is gloved. If the clemente is gloved and the clemente is surplus then the clemente is not utterable. The clemente is not gloved.", "logic": "\nAfoul(clemente)\nforall x (Gloved(x) and Surplus(x) -> not Utterable(x))\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Gloved(x))\nforall x (Gloved(x) and not Afoul(x) -> not Surplus(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Surplus(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Surplus(x))\nnot Aligned(clemente) -> Gloved(clemente)\nnot Afoul(clemente) -> Gloved(clemente)\nGloved(clemente) and Surplus(clemente) -> not Utterable(clemente)\n\nnot Gloved(clemente)\n\nAfoul(clemente) and forall x (Afoul(x) -> Surplus(x)) -> therefore Surplus(clemente) Surplus(clemente) and forall x (Surplus(x) -> Gloved(x)) -> therefore Gloved(clemente)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The tildy is strenuous. If something is chewy and flickering then it is not calvinist. All flickering things are chewy. If something is chewy and not strenuous then it is not flickering. If something is strenuous then it is flickering. All strenuous things are flickering. If the tildy is not anaphasic then the tildy is chewy. If the tildy is not strenuous then the tildy is chewy. If the tildy is chewy and the tildy is flickering then the tildy is not calvinist. The tildy is not calvinist.", "logic": "\nStrenuous(tildy)\nforall x (Chewy(x) and Flickering(x) -> not Calvinist(x))\nforall x (Flickering(x) -> Chewy(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) and not Strenuous(x) -> not Flickering(x))\nforall x (Strenuous(x) -> Flickering(x))\nforall x (Strenuous(x) -> Flickering(x))\nnot Anaphasic(tildy) -> Chewy(tildy)\nnot Strenuous(tildy) -> Chewy(tildy)\nChewy(tildy) and Flickering(tildy) -> not Calvinist(tildy)\n\nnot Calvinist(tildy)\n\nStrenuous(tildy) and forall x (Strenuous(x) -> Flickering(x)) -> therefore Flickering(tildy) Flickering(tildy) and forall x (Flickering(x) -> Chewy(x)) -> therefore Chewy(tildy) Strenuous(tildy) and forall x (Strenuous(x) -> Flickering(x)) -> therefore Flickering(tildy) Chewy(tildy) and Flickering(tildy) and forall x (Chewy(x) and Flickering(x) -> not Calvinist(x)) -> therefore not Calvinist(tildy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The piotr is brinded. If something is cambodian and brash then it is not untaped. All brash things are cambodian. If something is cambodian and not brinded then it is not brash. If something is brinded then it is brash. All brinded things are brash. If the piotr is not effortless then the piotr is cambodian. If the piotr is not brinded then the piotr is cambodian. If the piotr is cambodian and the piotr is brash then the piotr is not untaped. The piotr is untaped.", "logic": "\nBrinded(piotr)\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and Brash(x) -> not Untaped(x))\nforall x (Brash(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and not Brinded(x) -> not Brash(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Brash(x))\nnot Effortless(piotr) -> Cambodian(piotr)\nnot Brinded(piotr) -> Cambodian(piotr)\nCambodian(piotr) and Brash(piotr) -> not Untaped(piotr)\n\nUntaped(piotr)\n\nBrinded(piotr) and forall x (Brinded(x) -> Brash(x)) -> therefore Brash(piotr) Brash(piotr) and forall x (Brash(x) -> Cambodian(x)) -> therefore Cambodian(piotr) Brinded(piotr) and forall x (Brinded(x) -> Brash(x)) -> therefore Brash(piotr) Cambodian(piotr) and Brash(piotr) and forall x (Cambodian(x) and Brash(x) -> not Untaped(x)) -> therefore not Untaped(piotr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The hazel is axenic. If something is stearic and rocky then it is not uninvolved. All rocky things are stearic. If something is stearic and not axenic then it is not rocky. If something is axenic then it is rocky. All axenic things are rocky. If the hazel is not smudgy then the hazel is stearic. If the hazel is not axenic then the hazel is stearic. If the hazel is stearic and the hazel is rocky then the hazel is not uninvolved. The hazel does not like the hazel.", "logic": "\nAxenic(hazel)\nforall x (Stearic(x) and Rocky(x) -> not Uninvolved(x))\nforall x (Rocky(x) -> Stearic(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) and not Axenic(x) -> not Rocky(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) -> Rocky(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) -> Rocky(x))\nnot Smudgy(hazel) -> Stearic(hazel)\nnot Axenic(hazel) -> Stearic(hazel)\nStearic(hazel) and Rocky(hazel) -> not Uninvolved(hazel)\n\nnot Likes(hazel, hazel)\n\nnot Likes(hazel, hazel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The shell is satiable. If something is marketable and lyonnaise then it is not drinkable. All lyonnaise things are marketable. If something is marketable and not satiable then it is not lyonnaise. If something is satiable then it is lyonnaise. All satiable things are lyonnaise. If the shell is not phonemic then the shell is marketable. If the shell is not satiable then the shell is marketable. If the shell is marketable and the shell is lyonnaise then the shell is not drinkable. The shell is phonemic.", "logic": "\nSatiable(shell)\nforall x (Marketable(x) and Lyonnaise(x) -> not Drinkable(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) -> Marketable(x))\nforall x (Marketable(x) and not Satiable(x) -> not Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Satiable(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Satiable(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nnot Phonemic(shell) -> Marketable(shell)\nnot Satiable(shell) -> Marketable(shell)\nMarketable(shell) and Lyonnaise(shell) -> not Drinkable(shell)\n\nPhonemic(shell)\n\nPhonemic(shell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The dierdre is maddening. If something is ancestral and agnostical then it is not manic. All agnostical things are ancestral. If something is ancestral and not maddening then it is not agnostical. If something is maddening then it is agnostical. All maddening things are agnostical. If the dierdre is not billed then the dierdre is ancestral. If the dierdre is not maddening then the dierdre is ancestral. If the dierdre is ancestral and the dierdre is agnostical then the dierdre is not manic. The dierdre does not see the dierdre.", "logic": "\nMaddening(dierdre)\nforall x (Ancestral(x) and Agnostical(x) -> not Manic(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Ancestral(x))\nforall x (Ancestral(x) and not Maddening(x) -> not Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Maddening(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Maddening(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nnot Billed(dierdre) -> Ancestral(dierdre)\nnot Maddening(dierdre) -> Ancestral(dierdre)\nAncestral(dierdre) and Agnostical(dierdre) -> not Manic(dierdre)\n\nnot Sees(dierdre, dierdre)\n\nnot Sees(dierdre, dierdre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The tasia is efficient. If something is profuse and unfilled then it is not incisive. All unfilled things are profuse. If something is profuse and not efficient then it is not unfilled. If something is efficient then it is unfilled. All efficient things are unfilled. If the tasia is not fatuous then the tasia is profuse. If the tasia is not efficient then the tasia is profuse. If the tasia is profuse and the tasia is unfilled then the tasia is not incisive. The tasia visits the tasia.", "logic": "\nEfficient(tasia)\nforall x (Profuse(x) and Unfilled(x) -> not Incisive(x))\nforall x (Unfilled(x) -> Profuse(x))\nforall x (Profuse(x) and not Efficient(x) -> not Unfilled(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> Unfilled(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> Unfilled(x))\nnot Fatuous(tasia) -> Profuse(tasia)\nnot Efficient(tasia) -> Profuse(tasia)\nProfuse(tasia) and Unfilled(tasia) -> not Incisive(tasia)\n\nVisits(tasia, tasia)\n\nVisits(tasia, tasia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The mariette satirise the husein. The husein does not visit the mariette. If something satirise the husein then the husein does not need the mariette. If something rubbish the husein then the husein does not see the mariette. If something satirise the mariette then the mariette rubbish the husein. If the husein does not need the mariette then the mariette rubbish the husein. If the mariette rubbish the husein then the mariette is ungreased. If the husein does not see the mariette then the mariette is cairned. If something is blate and it incandesce the husein then it does not visit the mariette. If something incandesce the husein and it is not cairned then it incandesce the mariette. The husein does not visit the mariette.", "logic": "\nSatirise(mariette, husein)\nnot Incandesce(husein, mariette)\nforall x (Satirise(x, husein) -> not Rubbish(husein, mariette))\nforall x (Rubbish(x, husein) -> not Satirise(husein, mariette))\nforall x (Satirise(x, mariette) -> Rubbish(mariette, husein))\nnot Rubbish(husein, mariette) -> Rubbish(mariette, husein)\nRubbish(mariette, husein) -> Ungreased(mariette)\nnot Satirise(husein, mariette) -> Cairned(mariette)\nforall x (Blate(x) and Incandesce(x, husein) -> not Incandesce(x, mariette))\nforall x (Incandesce(x, husein) and not Cairned(x) -> Incandesce(x, mariette))\n\nnot Incandesce(husein, mariette)\n\ntherefore not Incandesce(husein, mariette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The phaidra bill the ulrika. The ulrika does not visit the phaidra. If something bill the ulrika then the ulrika does not need the phaidra. If something suspend the ulrika then the ulrika does not see the phaidra. If something bill the phaidra then the phaidra suspend the ulrika. If the ulrika does not need the phaidra then the phaidra suspend the ulrika. If the phaidra suspend the ulrika then the phaidra is inodorous. If the ulrika does not see the phaidra then the phaidra is caudal. If something is subsidized and it omen the ulrika then it does not visit the phaidra. If something omen the ulrika and it is not caudal then it omen the phaidra. The ulrika omen the phaidra.", "logic": "\nBill(phaidra, ulrika)\nnot Omen(ulrika, phaidra)\nforall x (Bill(x, ulrika) -> not Suspend(ulrika, phaidra))\nforall x (Suspend(x, ulrika) -> not Bill(ulrika, phaidra))\nforall x (Bill(x, phaidra) -> Suspend(phaidra, ulrika))\nnot Suspend(ulrika, phaidra) -> Suspend(phaidra, ulrika)\nSuspend(phaidra, ulrika) -> Inodorous(phaidra)\nnot Bill(ulrika, phaidra) -> Caudal(phaidra)\nforall x (Subsidized(x) and Omen(x, ulrika) -> not Omen(x, phaidra))\nforall x (Omen(x, ulrika) and not Caudal(x) -> Omen(x, phaidra))\n\nOmen(ulrika, phaidra)\n\ntherefore not Omen(ulrika, phaidra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The jennilee believe the mirna. The mirna does not visit the jennilee. If something believe the mirna then the mirna does not need the jennilee. If something seel the mirna then the mirna does not see the jennilee. If something believe the jennilee then the jennilee seel the mirna. If the mirna does not need the jennilee then the jennilee seel the mirna. If the jennilee seel the mirna then the jennilee is lonely. If the mirna does not see the jennilee then the jennilee is uneatable. If something is fernlike and it bodypaint the mirna then it does not visit the jennilee. If something bodypaint the mirna and it is not uneatable then it bodypaint the jennilee. The mirna does not need the jennilee.", "logic": "\nBelieve(jennilee, mirna)\nnot Bodypaint(mirna, jennilee)\nforall x (Believe(x, mirna) -> not Seel(mirna, jennilee))\nforall x (Seel(x, mirna) -> not Believe(mirna, jennilee))\nforall x (Believe(x, jennilee) -> Seel(jennilee, mirna))\nnot Seel(mirna, jennilee) -> Seel(jennilee, mirna)\nSeel(jennilee, mirna) -> Lonely(jennilee)\nnot Believe(mirna, jennilee) -> Uneatable(jennilee)\nforall x (Fernlike(x) and Bodypaint(x, mirna) -> not Bodypaint(x, jennilee))\nforall x (Bodypaint(x, mirna) and not Uneatable(x) -> Bodypaint(x, jennilee))\n\nnot Seel(mirna, jennilee)\n\nBelieve(jennilee, mirna) and forall x (Believe(x, mirna) -> not Seel(mirna, jennilee)) -> therefore not Seel(mirna, jennilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The antonius bowse the jeremie. The jeremie does not visit the antonius. If something bowse the jeremie then the jeremie does not need the antonius. If something gazette the jeremie then the jeremie does not see the antonius. If something bowse the antonius then the antonius gazette the jeremie. If the jeremie does not need the antonius then the antonius gazette the jeremie. If the antonius gazette the jeremie then the antonius is unmerited. If the jeremie does not see the antonius then the antonius is dextral. If something is resupine and it emcee the jeremie then it does not visit the antonius. If something emcee the jeremie and it is not dextral then it emcee the antonius. The jeremie gazette the antonius.", "logic": "\nBowse(antonius, jeremie)\nnot Emcee(jeremie, antonius)\nforall x (Bowse(x, jeremie) -> not Gazette(jeremie, antonius))\nforall x (Gazette(x, jeremie) -> not Bowse(jeremie, antonius))\nforall x (Bowse(x, antonius) -> Gazette(antonius, jeremie))\nnot Gazette(jeremie, antonius) -> Gazette(antonius, jeremie)\nGazette(antonius, jeremie) -> Unmerited(antonius)\nnot Bowse(jeremie, antonius) -> Dextral(antonius)\nforall x (Resupine(x) and Emcee(x, jeremie) -> not Emcee(x, antonius))\nforall x (Emcee(x, jeremie) and not Dextral(x) -> Emcee(x, antonius))\n\nGazette(jeremie, antonius)\n\nBowse(antonius, jeremie) and forall x (Bowse(x, jeremie) -> not Gazette(jeremie, antonius)) -> therefore not Gazette(jeremie, antonius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The cinda adorn the hamilton. The hamilton does not visit the cinda. If something adorn the hamilton then the hamilton does not need the cinda. If something descale the hamilton then the hamilton does not see the cinda. If something adorn the cinda then the cinda descale the hamilton. If the hamilton does not need the cinda then the cinda descale the hamilton. If the cinda descale the hamilton then the cinda is woolen. If the hamilton does not see the cinda then the cinda is upper. If something is aphonic and it pollinate the hamilton then it does not visit the cinda. If something pollinate the hamilton and it is not upper then it pollinate the cinda. The cinda descale the hamilton.", "logic": "\nAdorn(cinda, hamilton)\nnot Pollinate(hamilton, cinda)\nforall x (Adorn(x, hamilton) -> not Descale(hamilton, cinda))\nforall x (Descale(x, hamilton) -> not Adorn(hamilton, cinda))\nforall x (Adorn(x, cinda) -> Descale(cinda, hamilton))\nnot Descale(hamilton, cinda) -> Descale(cinda, hamilton)\nDescale(cinda, hamilton) -> Woolen(cinda)\nnot Adorn(hamilton, cinda) -> Upper(cinda)\nforall x (Aphonic(x) and Pollinate(x, hamilton) -> not Pollinate(x, cinda))\nforall x (Pollinate(x, hamilton) and not Upper(x) -> Pollinate(x, cinda))\n\nDescale(cinda, hamilton)\n\nAdorn(cinda, hamilton) and forall x (Adorn(x, hamilton) -> not Descale(hamilton, cinda)) -> therefore not Descale(hamilton, cinda) not Descale(hamilton, cinda) and not Descale(hamilton, cinda) -> Descale(cinda, hamilton) -> therefore Descale(cinda, hamilton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The monique stop the emil. The emil does not visit the monique. If something stop the emil then the emil does not need the monique. If something staff the emil then the emil does not see the monique. If something stop the monique then the monique staff the emil. If the emil does not need the monique then the monique staff the emil. If the monique staff the emil then the monique is inner. If the emil does not see the monique then the monique is unfastened. If something is expositive and it correlate the emil then it does not visit the monique. If something correlate the emil and it is not unfastened then it correlate the monique. The monique does not need the emil.", "logic": "\nStop(monique, emil)\nnot Correlate(emil, monique)\nforall x (Stop(x, emil) -> not Staff(emil, monique))\nforall x (Staff(x, emil) -> not Stop(emil, monique))\nforall x (Stop(x, monique) -> Staff(monique, emil))\nnot Staff(emil, monique) -> Staff(monique, emil)\nStaff(monique, emil) -> Inner(monique)\nnot Stop(emil, monique) -> Unfastened(monique)\nforall x (Expositive(x) and Correlate(x, emil) -> not Correlate(x, monique))\nforall x (Correlate(x, emil) and not Unfastened(x) -> Correlate(x, monique))\n\nnot Staff(monique, emil)\n\nStop(monique, emil) and forall x (Stop(x, emil) -> not Staff(emil, monique)) -> therefore not Staff(emil, monique) not Staff(emil, monique) and not Staff(emil, monique) -> Staff(monique, emil) -> therefore Staff(monique, emil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The peggy annoy the sabra. The sabra does not visit the peggy. If something annoy the sabra then the sabra does not need the peggy. If something nark the sabra then the sabra does not see the peggy. If something annoy the peggy then the peggy nark the sabra. If the sabra does not need the peggy then the peggy nark the sabra. If the peggy nark the sabra then the peggy is unplanned. If the sabra does not see the peggy then the peggy is delphian. If something is disclosed and it dispel the sabra then it does not visit the peggy. If something dispel the sabra and it is not delphian then it dispel the peggy. The peggy is unplanned.", "logic": "\nAnnoy(peggy, sabra)\nnot Dispel(sabra, peggy)\nforall x (Annoy(x, sabra) -> not Nark(sabra, peggy))\nforall x (Nark(x, sabra) -> not Annoy(sabra, peggy))\nforall x (Annoy(x, peggy) -> Nark(peggy, sabra))\nnot Nark(sabra, peggy) -> Nark(peggy, sabra)\nNark(peggy, sabra) -> Unplanned(peggy)\nnot Annoy(sabra, peggy) -> Delphian(peggy)\nforall x (Disclosed(x) and Dispel(x, sabra) -> not Dispel(x, peggy))\nforall x (Dispel(x, sabra) and not Delphian(x) -> Dispel(x, peggy))\n\nUnplanned(peggy)\n\nAnnoy(peggy, sabra) and forall x (Annoy(x, sabra) -> not Nark(sabra, peggy)) -> therefore not Nark(sabra, peggy) not Nark(sabra, peggy) and not Nark(sabra, peggy) -> Nark(peggy, sabra) -> therefore Nark(peggy, sabra) Nark(peggy, sabra) and Nark(peggy, sabra) -> Unplanned(peggy) -> therefore Unplanned(peggy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The jess acetylize the jesselyn. The jesselyn does not visit the jess. If something acetylize the jesselyn then the jesselyn does not need the jess. If something mislay the jesselyn then the jesselyn does not see the jess. If something acetylize the jess then the jess mislay the jesselyn. If the jesselyn does not need the jess then the jess mislay the jesselyn. If the jess mislay the jesselyn then the jess is headless. If the jesselyn does not see the jess then the jess is nonextant. If something is warning and it cleave the jesselyn then it does not visit the jess. If something cleave the jesselyn and it is not nonextant then it cleave the jess. The jesselyn acetylize the jess.", "logic": "\nAcetylize(jess, jesselyn)\nnot Cleave(jesselyn, jess)\nforall x (Acetylize(x, jesselyn) -> not Mislay(jesselyn, jess))\nforall x (Mislay(x, jesselyn) -> not Acetylize(jesselyn, jess))\nforall x (Acetylize(x, jess) -> Mislay(jess, jesselyn))\nnot Mislay(jesselyn, jess) -> Mislay(jess, jesselyn)\nMislay(jess, jesselyn) -> Headless(jess)\nnot Acetylize(jesselyn, jess) -> Nonextant(jess)\nforall x (Warning(x) and Cleave(x, jesselyn) -> not Cleave(x, jess))\nforall x (Cleave(x, jesselyn) and not Nonextant(x) -> Cleave(x, jess))\n\nAcetylize(jesselyn, jess)\n\nAcetylize(jess, jesselyn) and forall x (Acetylize(x, jesselyn) -> not Mislay(jesselyn, jess)) -> therefore not Mislay(jesselyn, jess) not Mislay(jesselyn, jess) and not Mislay(jesselyn, jess) -> Mislay(jess, jesselyn) -> therefore Mislay(jess, jesselyn) Mislay(jess, jesselyn) and forall x (Mislay(x, jesselyn) -> not Acetylize(jesselyn, jess)) -> therefore not Acetylize(jesselyn, jess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The kippie consummate the darice. The darice does not visit the kippie. If something consummate the darice then the darice does not need the kippie. If something abandon the darice then the darice does not see the kippie. If something consummate the kippie then the kippie abandon the darice. If the darice does not need the kippie then the kippie abandon the darice. If the kippie abandon the darice then the kippie is unequal. If the darice does not see the kippie then the kippie is unwitting. If something is inhumane and it sulfate the darice then it does not visit the kippie. If something sulfate the darice and it is not unwitting then it sulfate the kippie. The kippie does not visit the kippie.", "logic": "\nConsummate(kippie, darice)\nnot Sulfate(darice, kippie)\nforall x (Consummate(x, darice) -> not Abandon(darice, kippie))\nforall x (Abandon(x, darice) -> not Consummate(darice, kippie))\nforall x (Consummate(x, kippie) -> Abandon(kippie, darice))\nnot Abandon(darice, kippie) -> Abandon(kippie, darice)\nAbandon(kippie, darice) -> Unequal(kippie)\nnot Consummate(darice, kippie) -> Unwitting(kippie)\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Sulfate(x, darice) -> not Sulfate(x, kippie))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, darice) and not Unwitting(x) -> Sulfate(x, kippie))\n\nnot Sulfate(kippie, kippie)\n\nforall x (Sulfate(x, darice) and not Unwitting(x) -> Sulfate(x, kippie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The wiatt relent the juanita. The juanita does not visit the wiatt. If something relent the juanita then the juanita does not need the wiatt. If something regale the juanita then the juanita does not see the wiatt. If something relent the wiatt then the wiatt regale the juanita. If the juanita does not need the wiatt then the wiatt regale the juanita. If the wiatt regale the juanita then the wiatt is tasmanian. If the juanita does not see the wiatt then the wiatt is potent. If something is inventive and it outnumber the juanita then it does not visit the wiatt. If something outnumber the juanita and it is not potent then it outnumber the wiatt. The juanita regale the juanita.", "logic": "\nRelent(wiatt, juanita)\nnot Outnumber(juanita, wiatt)\nforall x (Relent(x, juanita) -> not Regale(juanita, wiatt))\nforall x (Regale(x, juanita) -> not Relent(juanita, wiatt))\nforall x (Relent(x, wiatt) -> Regale(wiatt, juanita))\nnot Regale(juanita, wiatt) -> Regale(wiatt, juanita)\nRegale(wiatt, juanita) -> Tasmanian(wiatt)\nnot Relent(juanita, wiatt) -> Potent(wiatt)\nforall x (Inventive(x) and Outnumber(x, juanita) -> not Outnumber(x, wiatt))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, juanita) and not Potent(x) -> Outnumber(x, wiatt))\n\nRegale(juanita, juanita)\n\nRegale(juanita, juanita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The nelie burglarize the elfreda. The elfreda does not visit the nelie. If something burglarize the elfreda then the elfreda does not need the nelie. If something stud the elfreda then the elfreda does not see the nelie. If something burglarize the nelie then the nelie stud the elfreda. If the elfreda does not need the nelie then the nelie stud the elfreda. If the nelie stud the elfreda then the nelie is ordinal. If the elfreda does not see the nelie then the nelie is botanical. If something is aseptic and it infuse the elfreda then it does not visit the nelie. If something infuse the elfreda and it is not botanical then it infuse the nelie. The elfreda does not see the elfreda.", "logic": "\nBurglarize(nelie, elfreda)\nnot Infuse(elfreda, nelie)\nforall x (Burglarize(x, elfreda) -> not Stud(elfreda, nelie))\nforall x (Stud(x, elfreda) -> not Burglarize(elfreda, nelie))\nforall x (Burglarize(x, nelie) -> Stud(nelie, elfreda))\nnot Stud(elfreda, nelie) -> Stud(nelie, elfreda)\nStud(nelie, elfreda) -> Ordinal(nelie)\nnot Burglarize(elfreda, nelie) -> Botanical(nelie)\nforall x (Aseptic(x) and Infuse(x, elfreda) -> not Infuse(x, nelie))\nforall x (Infuse(x, elfreda) and not Botanical(x) -> Infuse(x, nelie))\n\nnot Burglarize(elfreda, elfreda)\n\nnot Burglarize(elfreda, elfreda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The niven ditch the ferdy. The ferdy does not visit the niven. If something ditch the ferdy then the ferdy does not need the niven. If something intermarry the ferdy then the ferdy does not see the niven. If something ditch the niven then the niven intermarry the ferdy. If the ferdy does not need the niven then the niven intermarry the ferdy. If the niven intermarry the ferdy then the niven is addressed. If the ferdy does not see the niven then the niven is irritable. If something is peroneal and it generalize the ferdy then it does not visit the niven. If something generalize the ferdy and it is not irritable then it generalize the niven. The ferdy is rough.", "logic": "\nDitch(niven, ferdy)\nnot Generalize(ferdy, niven)\nforall x (Ditch(x, ferdy) -> not Intermarry(ferdy, niven))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, ferdy) -> not Ditch(ferdy, niven))\nforall x (Ditch(x, niven) -> Intermarry(niven, ferdy))\nnot Intermarry(ferdy, niven) -> Intermarry(niven, ferdy)\nIntermarry(niven, ferdy) -> Addressed(niven)\nnot Ditch(ferdy, niven) -> Irritable(niven)\nforall x (Peroneal(x) and Generalize(x, ferdy) -> not Generalize(x, niven))\nforall x (Generalize(x, ferdy) and not Irritable(x) -> Generalize(x, niven))\n\nRough(ferdy)\n\nRough(ferdy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The ilsa secede the vick. The vick does not visit the ilsa. If something secede the vick then the vick does not need the ilsa. If something beseem the vick then the vick does not see the ilsa. If something secede the ilsa then the ilsa beseem the vick. If the vick does not need the ilsa then the ilsa beseem the vick. If the ilsa beseem the vick then the ilsa is ellipsoid. If the vick does not see the ilsa then the ilsa is additional. If something is paranormal and it conform the vick then it does not visit the ilsa. If something conform the vick and it is not additional then it conform the ilsa. The ilsa is not rough.", "logic": "\nSecede(ilsa, vick)\nnot Conform(vick, ilsa)\nforall x (Secede(x, vick) -> not Beseem(vick, ilsa))\nforall x (Beseem(x, vick) -> not Secede(vick, ilsa))\nforall x (Secede(x, ilsa) -> Beseem(ilsa, vick))\nnot Beseem(vick, ilsa) -> Beseem(ilsa, vick)\nBeseem(ilsa, vick) -> Ellipsoid(ilsa)\nnot Secede(vick, ilsa) -> Additional(ilsa)\nforall x (Paranormal(x) and Conform(x, vick) -> not Conform(x, ilsa))\nforall x (Conform(x, vick) and not Additional(x) -> Conform(x, ilsa))\n\nnot Rough(ilsa)\n\nnot Rough(ilsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The philip appeal the stella. The stella does not visit the philip. If something appeal the stella then the stella does not need the philip. If something belie the stella then the stella does not see the philip. If something appeal the philip then the philip belie the stella. If the stella does not need the philip then the philip belie the stella. If the philip belie the stella then the philip is unburdened. If the stella does not see the philip then the philip is submissive. If something is monstrous and it straighten the stella then it does not visit the philip. If something straighten the stella and it is not submissive then it straighten the philip. The stella is cold.", "logic": "\nAppeal(philip, stella)\nnot Straighten(stella, philip)\nforall x (Appeal(x, stella) -> not Belie(stella, philip))\nforall x (Belie(x, stella) -> not Appeal(stella, philip))\nforall x (Appeal(x, philip) -> Belie(philip, stella))\nnot Belie(stella, philip) -> Belie(philip, stella)\nBelie(philip, stella) -> Unburdened(philip)\nnot Appeal(stella, philip) -> Submissive(philip)\nforall x (Monstrous(x) and Straighten(x, stella) -> not Straighten(x, philip))\nforall x (Straighten(x, stella) and not Submissive(x) -> Straighten(x, philip))\n\nCold(stella)\n\nCold(stella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The kip poach the larisa. The larisa does not visit the kip. If something poach the larisa then the larisa does not need the kip. If something defoliate the larisa then the larisa does not see the kip. If something poach the kip then the kip defoliate the larisa. If the larisa does not need the kip then the kip defoliate the larisa. If the kip defoliate the larisa then the kip is untempered. If the larisa does not see the kip then the kip is bulblike. If something is ametropic and it desorb the larisa then it does not visit the kip. If something desorb the larisa and it is not bulblike then it desorb the kip. The larisa is not bulblike.", "logic": "\nPoach(kip, larisa)\nnot Desorb(larisa, kip)\nforall x (Poach(x, larisa) -> not Defoliate(larisa, kip))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, larisa) -> not Poach(larisa, kip))\nforall x (Poach(x, kip) -> Defoliate(kip, larisa))\nnot Defoliate(larisa, kip) -> Defoliate(kip, larisa)\nDefoliate(kip, larisa) -> Untempered(kip)\nnot Poach(larisa, kip) -> Bulblike(kip)\nforall x (Ametropic(x) and Desorb(x, larisa) -> not Desorb(x, kip))\nforall x (Desorb(x, larisa) and not Bulblike(x) -> Desorb(x, kip))\n\nnot Bulblike(larisa)\n\nnot Bulblike(larisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The henrik frazzle the natasha. The natasha does not visit the henrik. If something frazzle the natasha then the natasha does not need the henrik. If something uprise the natasha then the natasha does not see the henrik. If something frazzle the henrik then the henrik uprise the natasha. If the natasha does not need the henrik then the henrik uprise the natasha. If the henrik uprise the natasha then the henrik is hagridden. If the natasha does not see the henrik then the henrik is devout. If something is advisory and it reforest the natasha then it does not visit the henrik. If something reforest the natasha and it is not devout then it reforest the henrik. The henrik is cold.", "logic": "\nFrazzle(henrik, natasha)\nnot Reforest(natasha, henrik)\nforall x (Frazzle(x, natasha) -> not Uprise(natasha, henrik))\nforall x (Uprise(x, natasha) -> not Frazzle(natasha, henrik))\nforall x (Frazzle(x, henrik) -> Uprise(henrik, natasha))\nnot Uprise(natasha, henrik) -> Uprise(henrik, natasha)\nUprise(henrik, natasha) -> Hagridden(henrik)\nnot Frazzle(natasha, henrik) -> Devout(henrik)\nforall x (Advisory(x) and Reforest(x, natasha) -> not Reforest(x, henrik))\nforall x (Reforest(x, natasha) and not Devout(x) -> Reforest(x, henrik))\n\nCold(henrik)\n\nCold(henrik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "Elayne is goaded. Luigi is snarly. Archibald is unproven. Quiet things are defendable. If Luigi is addressed then Luigi is defendable. All homing, snarly things are defendable. Quiet things are defendable. Green, defendable things are millionth. If something is addressed then it is snarly. If something is millionth and unproven then it is homing. Green things are unproven. Archibald is unproven.", "logic": "\nGoaded(elayne)\nSnarly(luigi)\nUnproven(archibald)\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Defendable(x))\nAddressed(luigi) -> Defendable(luigi)\nforall x (Homing(x) and Snarly(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Defendable(x))\nforall x (Goaded(x) and Defendable(x) -> Millionth(x))\nforall x (Addressed(x) -> Snarly(x))\nforall x (Millionth(x) and Unproven(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Goaded(x) -> Unproven(x))\n\nUnproven(archibald)\n\ntherefore Unproven(archibald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Wiley is preceding. Ailene is diagnostic. Hilde is smothering. Quiet things are deflated. If Ailene is cancroid then Ailene is deflated. All inflexible, diagnostic things are deflated. Quiet things are deflated. Green, deflated things are tensile. If something is cancroid then it is diagnostic. If something is tensile and smothering then it is inflexible. Green things are smothering. Wiley is not preceding.", "logic": "\nPreceding(wiley)\nDiagnostic(ailene)\nSmothering(hilde)\nforall x (Smothering(x) -> Deflated(x))\nCancroid(ailene) -> Deflated(ailene)\nforall x (Inflexible(x) and Diagnostic(x) -> Deflated(x))\nforall x (Smothering(x) -> Deflated(x))\nforall x (Preceding(x) and Deflated(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Cancroid(x) -> Diagnostic(x))\nforall x (Tensile(x) and Smothering(x) -> Inflexible(x))\nforall x (Preceding(x) -> Smothering(x))\n\nnot Preceding(wiley)\n\ntherefore Preceding(wiley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Kristan is ingrowing. Lenore is suctorial. Jacquelin is attenuated. Quiet things are vulnerable. If Lenore is anicteric then Lenore is vulnerable. All decent, suctorial things are vulnerable. Quiet things are vulnerable. Green, vulnerable things are acetose. If something is anicteric then it is suctorial. If something is acetose and attenuated then it is decent. Green things are attenuated. Kristan is attenuated.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(kristan)\nSuctorial(lenore)\nAttenuated(jacquelin)\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\nAnicteric(lenore) -> Vulnerable(lenore)\nforall x (Decent(x) and Suctorial(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) and Vulnerable(x) -> Acetose(x))\nforall x (Anicteric(x) -> Suctorial(x))\nforall x (Acetose(x) and Attenuated(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Attenuated(x))\n\nAttenuated(kristan)\n\nIngrowing(kristan) and forall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Attenuated(x)) -> therefore Attenuated(kristan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Lucky is conductive. Jemmy is phonologic. Cherilynn is mosaic. Quiet things are soughing. If Jemmy is refreshful then Jemmy is soughing. All straggly, phonologic things are soughing. Quiet things are soughing. Green, soughing things are jungian. If something is refreshful then it is phonologic. If something is jungian and mosaic then it is straggly. Green things are mosaic. Lucky is not mosaic.", "logic": "\nConductive(lucky)\nPhonologic(jemmy)\nMosaic(cherilynn)\nforall x (Mosaic(x) -> Soughing(x))\nRefreshful(jemmy) -> Soughing(jemmy)\nforall x (Straggly(x) and Phonologic(x) -> Soughing(x))\nforall x (Mosaic(x) -> Soughing(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Soughing(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Refreshful(x) -> Phonologic(x))\nforall x (Jungian(x) and Mosaic(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) -> Mosaic(x))\n\nnot Mosaic(lucky)\n\nConductive(lucky) and forall x (Conductive(x) -> Mosaic(x)) -> therefore Mosaic(lucky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Sandie is vulval. Sharl is generic. Carlena is diverging. Quiet things are reported. If Sharl is garish then Sharl is reported. All negroid, generic things are reported. Quiet things are reported. Green, reported things are loony. If something is garish then it is generic. If something is loony and diverging then it is negroid. Green things are diverging. Sandie is reported.", "logic": "\nVulval(sandie)\nGeneric(sharl)\nDiverging(carlena)\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Reported(x))\nGarish(sharl) -> Reported(sharl)\nforall x (Negroid(x) and Generic(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Vulval(x) and Reported(x) -> Loony(x))\nforall x (Garish(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Loony(x) and Diverging(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Vulval(x) -> Diverging(x))\n\nReported(sandie)\n\nVulval(sandie) and forall x (Vulval(x) -> Diverging(x)) -> therefore Diverging(sandie) Diverging(sandie) and forall x (Diverging(x) -> Reported(x)) -> therefore Reported(sandie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Sheilah is sanitized. Karylin is dual. Mackenzie is despondent. Quiet things are prussian. If Karylin is extinct then Karylin is prussian. All justified, dual things are prussian. Quiet things are prussian. Green, prussian things are pursuing. If something is extinct then it is dual. If something is pursuing and despondent then it is justified. Green things are despondent. Sheilah is not prussian.", "logic": "\nSanitized(sheilah)\nDual(karylin)\nDespondent(mackenzie)\nforall x (Despondent(x) -> Prussian(x))\nExtinct(karylin) -> Prussian(karylin)\nforall x (Justified(x) and Dual(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Despondent(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) and Prussian(x) -> Pursuing(x))\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Pursuing(x) and Despondent(x) -> Justified(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) -> Despondent(x))\n\nnot Prussian(sheilah)\n\nSanitized(sheilah) and forall x (Sanitized(x) -> Despondent(x)) -> therefore Despondent(sheilah) Despondent(sheilah) and forall x (Despondent(x) -> Prussian(x)) -> therefore Prussian(sheilah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Lanny is pleading. Walt is cephalic. Charissa is crabby. Quiet things are slumberous. If Walt is titillated then Walt is slumberous. All palmar, cephalic things are slumberous. Quiet things are slumberous. Green, slumberous things are negligent. If something is titillated then it is cephalic. If something is negligent and crabby then it is palmar. Green things are crabby. Lanny is negligent.", "logic": "\nPleading(lanny)\nCephalic(walt)\nCrabby(charissa)\nforall x (Crabby(x) -> Slumberous(x))\nTitillated(walt) -> Slumberous(walt)\nforall x (Palmar(x) and Cephalic(x) -> Slumberous(x))\nforall x (Crabby(x) -> Slumberous(x))\nforall x (Pleading(x) and Slumberous(x) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Titillated(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) and Crabby(x) -> Palmar(x))\nforall x (Pleading(x) -> Crabby(x))\n\nNegligent(lanny)\n\nPleading(lanny) and forall x (Pleading(x) -> Crabby(x)) -> therefore Crabby(lanny) Crabby(lanny) and forall x (Crabby(x) -> Slumberous(x)) -> therefore Slumberous(lanny) Pleading(lanny) and Slumberous(lanny) and forall x (Pleading(x) and Slumberous(x) -> Negligent(x)) -> therefore Negligent(lanny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Antonella is aglow. Ardyce is cretaceous. Waine is bifoliate. Quiet things are eolithic. If Ardyce is blinded then Ardyce is eolithic. All promissory, cretaceous things are eolithic. Quiet things are eolithic. Green, eolithic things are garish. If something is blinded then it is cretaceous. If something is garish and bifoliate then it is promissory. Green things are bifoliate. Antonella is not garish.", "logic": "\nAglow(antonella)\nCretaceous(ardyce)\nBifoliate(waine)\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Eolithic(x))\nBlinded(ardyce) -> Eolithic(ardyce)\nforall x (Promissory(x) and Cretaceous(x) -> Eolithic(x))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Eolithic(x))\nforall x (Aglow(x) and Eolithic(x) -> Garish(x))\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Cretaceous(x))\nforall x (Garish(x) and Bifoliate(x) -> Promissory(x))\nforall x (Aglow(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\n\nnot Garish(antonella)\n\nAglow(antonella) and forall x (Aglow(x) -> Bifoliate(x)) -> therefore Bifoliate(antonella) Bifoliate(antonella) and forall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Eolithic(x)) -> therefore Eolithic(antonella) Aglow(antonella) and Eolithic(antonella) and forall x (Aglow(x) and Eolithic(x) -> Garish(x)) -> therefore Garish(antonella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Gussy is raised. Rustie is unreduced. Broddy is rabbinic. Quiet things are horned. If Rustie is bullheaded then Rustie is horned. All hilly, unreduced things are horned. Quiet things are horned. Green, horned things are spiritous. If something is bullheaded then it is unreduced. If something is spiritous and rabbinic then it is hilly. Green things are rabbinic. Broddy is not spiritous.", "logic": "\nRaised(gussy)\nUnreduced(rustie)\nRabbinic(broddy)\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) -> Horned(x))\nBullheaded(rustie) -> Horned(rustie)\nforall x (Hilly(x) and Unreduced(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Raised(x) and Horned(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Spiritous(x) and Rabbinic(x) -> Hilly(x))\nforall x (Raised(x) -> Rabbinic(x))\n\nnot Spiritous(broddy)\n\nforall x (Raised(x) and Horned(x) -> Spiritous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Marysa is voltarean. Jessie is unwed. Fritz is misty. Quiet things are afflictive. If Jessie is excitatory then Jessie is afflictive. All statutory, unwed things are afflictive. Quiet things are afflictive. Green, afflictive things are awed. If something is excitatory then it is unwed. If something is awed and misty then it is statutory. Green things are misty. Jessie is misty.", "logic": "\nVoltarean(marysa)\nUnwed(jessie)\nMisty(fritz)\nforall x (Misty(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nExcitatory(jessie) -> Afflictive(jessie)\nforall x (Statutory(x) and Unwed(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nforall x (Voltarean(x) and Afflictive(x) -> Awed(x))\nforall x (Excitatory(x) -> Unwed(x))\nforall x (Awed(x) and Misty(x) -> Statutory(x))\nforall x (Voltarean(x) -> Misty(x))\n\nMisty(jessie)\n\nforall x (Voltarean(x) -> Misty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Arly is additive. Cherilynn is argentic. Arianne is antipodean. Quiet things are abactinal. If Cherilynn is pinioned then Cherilynn is abactinal. All abomasal, argentic things are abactinal. Quiet things are abactinal. Green, abactinal things are afoul. If something is pinioned then it is argentic. If something is afoul and antipodean then it is abomasal. Green things are antipodean. Arianne is not abomasal.", "logic": "\nAdditive(arly)\nArgentic(cherilynn)\nAntipodean(arianne)\nforall x (Antipodean(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nPinioned(cherilynn) -> Abactinal(cherilynn)\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Argentic(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Antipodean(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Additive(x) and Abactinal(x) -> Afoul(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Argentic(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Antipodean(x) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Additive(x) -> Antipodean(x))\n\nnot Abomasal(arianne)\n\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Antipodean(x) -> Abomasal(x)) <- forall x (Additive(x) and Abactinal(x) -> Afoul(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Stephanus is unwedded. Roddie is leisured. Sabrina is resounding. Quiet things are westerly. If Roddie is fleeceable then Roddie is westerly. All unafraid, leisured things are westerly. Quiet things are westerly. Green, westerly things are antiviral. If something is fleeceable then it is leisured. If something is antiviral and resounding then it is unafraid. Green things are resounding. Roddie is westerly.", "logic": "\nUnwedded(stephanus)\nLeisured(roddie)\nResounding(sabrina)\nforall x (Resounding(x) -> Westerly(x))\nFleeceable(roddie) -> Westerly(roddie)\nforall x (Unafraid(x) and Leisured(x) -> Westerly(x))\nforall x (Resounding(x) -> Westerly(x))\nforall x (Unwedded(x) and Westerly(x) -> Antiviral(x))\nforall x (Fleeceable(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Antiviral(x) and Resounding(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Unwedded(x) -> Resounding(x))\n\nWesterly(roddie)\n\nforall x (Unafraid(x) and Leisured(x) -> Westerly(x)) <- forall x (Antiviral(x) and Resounding(x) -> Unafraid(x)) <- forall x (Unwedded(x) and Westerly(x) -> Antiviral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Christy is statant. Zacherie is tumultuous. Kippie is munificent. Quiet things are incurved. If Zacherie is canonised then Zacherie is incurved. All nonopening, tumultuous things are incurved. Quiet things are incurved. Green, incurved things are negative. If something is canonised then it is tumultuous. If something is negative and munificent then it is nonopening. Green things are munificent. Zacherie is not statant.", "logic": "\nStatant(christy)\nTumultuous(zacherie)\nMunificent(kippie)\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Incurved(x))\nCanonised(zacherie) -> Incurved(zacherie)\nforall x (Nonopening(x) and Tumultuous(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Statant(x) and Incurved(x) -> Negative(x))\nforall x (Canonised(x) -> Tumultuous(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) and Munificent(x) -> Nonopening(x))\nforall x (Statant(x) -> Munificent(x))\n\nnot Statant(zacherie)\n\nnot Statant(zacherie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Lilyan is siliceous. Von is shattering. Derek is dismissed. Quiet things are humid. If Von is finer then Von is humid. All passionate, shattering things are humid. Quiet things are humid. Green, humid things are custodial. If something is finer then it is shattering. If something is custodial and dismissed then it is passionate. Green things are dismissed. Derek is siliceous.", "logic": "\nSiliceous(lilyan)\nShattering(von)\nDismissed(derek)\nforall x (Dismissed(x) -> Humid(x))\nFiner(von) -> Humid(von)\nforall x (Passionate(x) and Shattering(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Dismissed(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Siliceous(x) and Humid(x) -> Custodial(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Shattering(x))\nforall x (Custodial(x) and Dismissed(x) -> Passionate(x))\nforall x (Siliceous(x) -> Dismissed(x))\n\nSiliceous(derek)\n\nSiliceous(derek) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Buddy is paschal. Terence is adaptative. Kelsey is manly. Quiet things are stimulant. If Terence is disclike then Terence is stimulant. All basaltic, adaptative things are stimulant. Quiet things are stimulant. Green, stimulant things are binominal. If something is disclike then it is adaptative. If something is binominal and manly then it is basaltic. Green things are manly. Kelsey is not disclike.", "logic": "\nPaschal(buddy)\nAdaptative(terence)\nManly(kelsey)\nforall x (Manly(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nDisclike(terence) -> Stimulant(terence)\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Adaptative(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nforall x (Manly(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nforall x (Paschal(x) and Stimulant(x) -> Binominal(x))\nforall x (Disclike(x) -> Adaptative(x))\nforall x (Binominal(x) and Manly(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Paschal(x) -> Manly(x))\n\nnot Disclike(kelsey)\n\nnot Disclike(kelsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Steffi is logy. Taylor is loamy. Esther is chopfallen. Quiet things are erasmian. If Taylor is crural then Taylor is erasmian. All glamourous, loamy things are erasmian. Quiet things are erasmian. Green, erasmian things are relieved. If something is crural then it is loamy. If something is relieved and chopfallen then it is glamourous. Green things are chopfallen. Taylor is crural.", "logic": "\nLogy(steffi)\nLoamy(taylor)\nChopfallen(esther)\nforall x (Chopfallen(x) -> Erasmian(x))\nCrural(taylor) -> Erasmian(taylor)\nforall x (Glamourous(x) and Loamy(x) -> Erasmian(x))\nforall x (Chopfallen(x) -> Erasmian(x))\nforall x (Logy(x) and Erasmian(x) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Crural(x) -> Loamy(x))\nforall x (Relieved(x) and Chopfallen(x) -> Glamourous(x))\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Chopfallen(x))\n\nCrural(taylor)\n\nCrural(taylor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Ina is newsy. Ina is rearward. Garret is stale. Cold, unhumorous things are burry. Rough things are accurst. If Ina is burry and Ina is stale then Ina is newsy. Furry, stale things are newsy. Blue things are stale. All accurst things are burry. Ina is newsy.", "logic": "\nNewsy(ina)\nRearward(ina)\nStale(garret)\nforall x (Accurst(x) and Unhumorous(x) -> Burry(x))\nforall x (Rearward(x) -> Accurst(x))\nBurry(ina) and Stale(ina) -> Newsy(ina)\nforall x (Remote(x) and Stale(x) -> Newsy(x))\nforall x (Burry(x) -> Stale(x))\nforall x (Accurst(x) -> Burry(x))\n\nNewsy(ina)\n\ntherefore Newsy(ina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Rudyard is afrikaner. Rudyard is humorous. Park is anaerobic. Cold, stateless things are drear. Rough things are degressive. If Rudyard is drear and Rudyard is anaerobic then Rudyard is afrikaner. Furry, anaerobic things are afrikaner. Blue things are anaerobic. All degressive things are drear. Rudyard is not humorous.", "logic": "\nAfrikaner(rudyard)\nHumorous(rudyard)\nAnaerobic(park)\nforall x (Degressive(x) and Stateless(x) -> Drear(x))\nforall x (Humorous(x) -> Degressive(x))\nDrear(rudyard) and Anaerobic(rudyard) -> Afrikaner(rudyard)\nforall x (Persisting(x) and Anaerobic(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Drear(x) -> Anaerobic(x))\nforall x (Degressive(x) -> Drear(x))\n\nnot Humorous(rudyard)\n\ntherefore Humorous(rudyard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Marilyn is satiny. Marilyn is nonechoic. Tucky is buff. Cold, celibate things are unrevived. Rough things are subaquatic. If Marilyn is unrevived and Marilyn is buff then Marilyn is satiny. Furry, buff things are satiny. Blue things are buff. All subaquatic things are unrevived. Marilyn is subaquatic.", "logic": "\nSatiny(marilyn)\nNonechoic(marilyn)\nBuff(tucky)\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) and Celibate(x) -> Unrevived(x))\nforall x (Nonechoic(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\nUnrevived(marilyn) and Buff(marilyn) -> Satiny(marilyn)\nforall x (Titled(x) and Buff(x) -> Satiny(x))\nforall x (Unrevived(x) -> Buff(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Unrevived(x))\n\nSubaquatic(marilyn)\n\nNonechoic(marilyn) and forall x (Nonechoic(x) -> Subaquatic(x)) -> therefore Subaquatic(marilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Neville is petrifying. Neville is quack. Garcon is avertable. Cold, sagittal things are deciduous. Rough things are lost. If Neville is deciduous and Neville is avertable then Neville is petrifying. Furry, avertable things are petrifying. Blue things are avertable. All lost things are deciduous. Neville is not lost.", "logic": "\nPetrifying(neville)\nQuack(neville)\nAvertable(garcon)\nforall x (Lost(x) and Sagittal(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) -> Lost(x))\nDeciduous(neville) and Avertable(neville) -> Petrifying(neville)\nforall x (Outdated(x) and Avertable(x) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Deciduous(x) -> Avertable(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Deciduous(x))\n\nnot Lost(neville)\n\nQuack(neville) and forall x (Quack(x) -> Lost(x)) -> therefore Lost(neville)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Othello is alluring. Othello is symphonic. Gail is auriferous. Cold, malarial things are randomized. Rough things are acquired. If Othello is randomized and Othello is auriferous then Othello is alluring. Furry, auriferous things are alluring. Blue things are auriferous. All acquired things are randomized. Othello is randomized.", "logic": "\nAlluring(othello)\nSymphonic(othello)\nAuriferous(gail)\nforall x (Acquired(x) and Malarial(x) -> Randomized(x))\nforall x (Symphonic(x) -> Acquired(x))\nRandomized(othello) and Auriferous(othello) -> Alluring(othello)\nforall x (Ginger(x) and Auriferous(x) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Randomized(x) -> Auriferous(x))\nforall x (Acquired(x) -> Randomized(x))\n\nRandomized(othello)\n\nSymphonic(othello) and forall x (Symphonic(x) -> Acquired(x)) -> therefore Acquired(othello) Acquired(othello) and forall x (Acquired(x) -> Randomized(x)) -> therefore Randomized(othello)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Antonin is minimized. Antonin is pupal. Dedra is anaplastic. Cold, parotid things are imitation. Rough things are antitypic. If Antonin is imitation and Antonin is anaplastic then Antonin is minimized. Furry, anaplastic things are minimized. Blue things are anaplastic. All antitypic things are imitation. Antonin is not imitation.", "logic": "\nMinimized(antonin)\nPupal(antonin)\nAnaplastic(dedra)\nforall x (Antitypic(x) and Parotid(x) -> Imitation(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Antitypic(x))\nImitation(antonin) and Anaplastic(antonin) -> Minimized(antonin)\nforall x (Apposable(x) and Anaplastic(x) -> Minimized(x))\nforall x (Imitation(x) -> Anaplastic(x))\nforall x (Antitypic(x) -> Imitation(x))\n\nnot Imitation(antonin)\n\nPupal(antonin) and forall x (Pupal(x) -> Antitypic(x)) -> therefore Antitypic(antonin) Antitypic(antonin) and forall x (Antitypic(x) -> Imitation(x)) -> therefore Imitation(antonin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Aurlie is bilingual. Aurlie is trussed. Vanni is gallican. Cold, shinto things are hawaiian. Rough things are able. If Aurlie is hawaiian and Aurlie is gallican then Aurlie is bilingual. Furry, gallican things are bilingual. Blue things are gallican. All able things are hawaiian. Aurlie is gallican.", "logic": "\nBilingual(aurlie)\nTrussed(aurlie)\nGallican(vanni)\nforall x (Able(x) and Shinto(x) -> Hawaiian(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Able(x))\nHawaiian(aurlie) and Gallican(aurlie) -> Bilingual(aurlie)\nforall x (Spaced(x) and Gallican(x) -> Bilingual(x))\nforall x (Hawaiian(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Able(x) -> Hawaiian(x))\n\nGallican(aurlie)\n\nTrussed(aurlie) and forall x (Trussed(x) -> Able(x)) -> therefore Able(aurlie) Able(aurlie) and forall x (Able(x) -> Hawaiian(x)) -> therefore Hawaiian(aurlie) Hawaiian(aurlie) and forall x (Hawaiian(x) -> Gallican(x)) -> therefore Gallican(aurlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Brana is tyrannic. Brana is northern. Kam is luxurious. Cold, alien things are stung. Rough things are derisory. If Brana is stung and Brana is luxurious then Brana is tyrannic. Furry, luxurious things are tyrannic. Blue things are luxurious. All derisory things are stung. Brana is not luxurious.", "logic": "\nTyrannic(brana)\nNorthern(brana)\nLuxurious(kam)\nforall x (Derisory(x) and Alien(x) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Northern(x) -> Derisory(x))\nStung(brana) and Luxurious(brana) -> Tyrannic(brana)\nforall x (Decorous(x) and Luxurious(x) -> Tyrannic(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Luxurious(x))\nforall x (Derisory(x) -> Stung(x))\n\nnot Luxurious(brana)\n\nNorthern(brana) and forall x (Northern(x) -> Derisory(x)) -> therefore Derisory(brana) Derisory(brana) and forall x (Derisory(x) -> Stung(x)) -> therefore Stung(brana) Stung(brana) and forall x (Stung(x) -> Luxurious(x)) -> therefore Luxurious(brana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Annmaria is calamitous. Annmaria is sent. Collie is enviable. Cold, fancied things are inoperable. Rough things are debonnaire. If Annmaria is inoperable and Annmaria is enviable then Annmaria is calamitous. Furry, enviable things are calamitous. Blue things are enviable. All debonnaire things are inoperable. Collie is not debonnaire.", "logic": "\nCalamitous(annmaria)\nSent(annmaria)\nEnviable(collie)\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and Fancied(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Sent(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\nInoperable(annmaria) and Enviable(annmaria) -> Calamitous(annmaria)\nforall x (Planted(x) and Enviable(x) -> Calamitous(x))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) -> Enviable(x))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) -> Inoperable(x))\n\nnot Debonnaire(collie)\n\nforall x (Sent(x) -> Debonnaire(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Marleah is adust. Marleah is waterless. Georges is unrivaled. Cold, sacred things are flowing. Rough things are boughten. If Marleah is flowing and Marleah is unrivaled then Marleah is adust. Furry, unrivaled things are adust. Blue things are unrivaled. All boughten things are flowing. Georges is flowing.", "logic": "\nAdust(marleah)\nWaterless(marleah)\nUnrivaled(georges)\nforall x (Boughten(x) and Sacred(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Waterless(x) -> Boughten(x))\nFlowing(marleah) and Unrivaled(marleah) -> Adust(marleah)\nforall x (Rearmost(x) and Unrivaled(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Unrivaled(x))\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Flowing(x))\n\nFlowing(georges)\n\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Flowing(x)) <- forall x (Waterless(x) -> Boughten(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Kacey is parted. Kacey is pesky. Steffen is barbed. Cold, rwandan things are homey. Rough things are cytolytic. If Kacey is homey and Kacey is barbed then Kacey is parted. Furry, barbed things are parted. Blue things are barbed. All cytolytic things are homey. Steffen is not parted.", "logic": "\nParted(kacey)\nPesky(kacey)\nBarbed(steffen)\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) and Rwandan(x) -> Homey(x))\nforall x (Pesky(x) -> Cytolytic(x))\nHomey(kacey) and Barbed(kacey) -> Parted(kacey)\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and Barbed(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) -> Barbed(x))\nforall x (Cytolytic(x) -> Homey(x))\n\nnot Parted(steffen)\n\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and Barbed(x) -> Parted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Whitman is expressed. Whitman is rachitic. Imogen is huxleyan. Cold, affinal things are sublunar. Rough things are cognizable. If Whitman is sublunar and Whitman is huxleyan then Whitman is expressed. Furry, huxleyan things are expressed. Blue things are huxleyan. All cognizable things are sublunar. Imogen is staunch.", "logic": "\nExpressed(whitman)\nRachitic(whitman)\nHuxleyan(imogen)\nforall x (Cognizable(x) and Affinal(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Rachitic(x) -> Cognizable(x))\nSublunar(whitman) and Huxleyan(whitman) -> Expressed(whitman)\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Huxleyan(x) -> Expressed(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) -> Huxleyan(x))\nforall x (Cognizable(x) -> Sublunar(x))\n\nStaunch(imogen)\n\nStaunch(imogen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Maryann is albinistic. Maryann is upfield. Kalman is fingerless. Cold, juristic things are mediaeval. Rough things are tripinnate. If Maryann is mediaeval and Maryann is fingerless then Maryann is albinistic. Furry, fingerless things are albinistic. Blue things are fingerless. All tripinnate things are mediaeval. Kalman is not juristic.", "logic": "\nAlbinistic(maryann)\nUpfield(maryann)\nFingerless(kalman)\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) and Juristic(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\nforall x (Upfield(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\nMediaeval(maryann) and Fingerless(maryann) -> Albinistic(maryann)\nforall x (Telluric(x) and Fingerless(x) -> Albinistic(x))\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) -> Fingerless(x))\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\n\nnot Juristic(kalman)\n\nnot Juristic(kalman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Enriqueta is insoluble. Enriqueta is martian. Lorraine is undefiled. Cold, unguarded things are salted. Rough things are mannerly. If Enriqueta is salted and Enriqueta is undefiled then Enriqueta is insoluble. Furry, undefiled things are insoluble. Blue things are undefiled. All mannerly things are salted. Enriqueta is unguarded.", "logic": "\nInsoluble(enriqueta)\nMartian(enriqueta)\nUndefiled(lorraine)\nforall x (Mannerly(x) and Unguarded(x) -> Salted(x))\nforall x (Martian(x) -> Mannerly(x))\nSalted(enriqueta) and Undefiled(enriqueta) -> Insoluble(enriqueta)\nforall x (Swooning(x) and Undefiled(x) -> Insoluble(x))\nforall x (Salted(x) -> Undefiled(x))\nforall x (Mannerly(x) -> Salted(x))\n\nUnguarded(enriqueta)\n\nUnguarded(enriqueta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Gabriell is swagger. Gabriell is unholy. Genvieve is primitive. Cold, beatific things are piquant. Rough things are unservile. If Gabriell is piquant and Gabriell is primitive then Gabriell is swagger. Furry, primitive things are swagger. Blue things are primitive. All unservile things are piquant. Gabriell is not canescent.", "logic": "\nSwagger(gabriell)\nUnholy(gabriell)\nPrimitive(genvieve)\nforall x (Unservile(x) and Beatific(x) -> Piquant(x))\nforall x (Unholy(x) -> Unservile(x))\nPiquant(gabriell) and Primitive(gabriell) -> Swagger(gabriell)\nforall x (Canescent(x) and Primitive(x) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (Piquant(x) -> Primitive(x))\nforall x (Unservile(x) -> Piquant(x))\n\nnot Canescent(gabriell)\n\nnot Canescent(gabriell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Valaree is quasi. Valaree is balking. Garcon is malawian. Cold, sleazy things are comforting. Rough things are neritic. If Valaree is comforting and Valaree is malawian then Valaree is quasi. Furry, malawian things are quasi. Blue things are malawian. All neritic things are comforting. Garcon is balking.", "logic": "\nQuasi(valaree)\nBalking(valaree)\nMalawian(garcon)\nforall x (Neritic(x) and Sleazy(x) -> Comforting(x))\nforall x (Balking(x) -> Neritic(x))\nComforting(valaree) and Malawian(valaree) -> Quasi(valaree)\nforall x (Alterable(x) and Malawian(x) -> Quasi(x))\nforall x (Comforting(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Neritic(x) -> Comforting(x))\n\nBalking(garcon)\n\nBalking(garcon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Frances is archaean. Frances is murdered. Frances is astonished. Daphne is squinty. Daphne is murdered. Daphne is prefatory. Daphne is astonished. All upended, archaean things are squinty. If something is squinty then it is likely. If Daphne is archaean then Daphne is likely. If Frances is archaean then Frances is upended. If something is prefatory then it is likely. If Frances is archaean then Frances is upended. Daphne is astonished.", "logic": "\nArchaean(frances)\nMurdered(frances)\nAstonished(frances)\nSquinty(daphne)\nMurdered(daphne)\nPrefatory(daphne)\nAstonished(daphne)\nforall x (Upended(x) and Archaean(x) -> Squinty(x))\nforall x (Squinty(x) -> Likely(x))\nArchaean(daphne) -> Likely(daphne)\nArchaean(frances) -> Upended(frances)\nforall x (Prefatory(x) -> Likely(x))\nArchaean(frances) -> Upended(frances)\n\nAstonished(daphne)\n\ntherefore Astonished(daphne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Paco is mandatory. Paco is verboten. Paco is gold. Essa is federated. Essa is verboten. Essa is tippy. Essa is gold. All ruandan, mandatory things are federated. If something is federated then it is oxidative. If Essa is mandatory then Essa is oxidative. If Paco is mandatory then Paco is ruandan. If something is tippy then it is oxidative. If Paco is mandatory then Paco is ruandan. Essa is not verboten.", "logic": "\nMandatory(paco)\nVerboten(paco)\nGold(paco)\nFederated(essa)\nVerboten(essa)\nTippy(essa)\nGold(essa)\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Mandatory(x) -> Federated(x))\nforall x (Federated(x) -> Oxidative(x))\nMandatory(essa) -> Oxidative(essa)\nMandatory(paco) -> Ruandan(paco)\nforall x (Tippy(x) -> Oxidative(x))\nMandatory(paco) -> Ruandan(paco)\n\nnot Verboten(essa)\n\ntherefore Verboten(essa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Angela is blueish. Angela is starless. Angela is thundering. Waylon is axial. Waylon is starless. Waylon is errorless. Waylon is thundering. All moorish, blueish things are axial. If something is axial then it is bass. If Waylon is blueish then Waylon is bass. If Angela is blueish then Angela is moorish. If something is errorless then it is bass. If Angela is blueish then Angela is moorish. Waylon is bass.", "logic": "\nBlueish(angela)\nStarless(angela)\nThundering(angela)\nAxial(waylon)\nStarless(waylon)\nErrorless(waylon)\nThundering(waylon)\nforall x (Moorish(x) and Blueish(x) -> Axial(x))\nforall x (Axial(x) -> Bass(x))\nBlueish(waylon) -> Bass(waylon)\nBlueish(angela) -> Moorish(angela)\nforall x (Errorless(x) -> Bass(x))\nBlueish(angela) -> Moorish(angela)\n\nBass(waylon)\n\nAxial(waylon) and forall x (Axial(x) -> Bass(x)) -> therefore Bass(waylon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Britta is reclusive. Britta is trojan. Britta is sublimate. Wilt is unwilling. Wilt is trojan. Wilt is fogyish. Wilt is sublimate. All hesitating, reclusive things are unwilling. If something is unwilling then it is giving. If Wilt is reclusive then Wilt is giving. If Britta is reclusive then Britta is hesitating. If something is fogyish then it is giving. If Britta is reclusive then Britta is hesitating. Wilt is not giving.", "logic": "\nReclusive(britta)\nTrojan(britta)\nSublimate(britta)\nUnwilling(wilt)\nTrojan(wilt)\nFogyish(wilt)\nSublimate(wilt)\nforall x (Hesitating(x) and Reclusive(x) -> Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) -> Giving(x))\nReclusive(wilt) -> Giving(wilt)\nReclusive(britta) -> Hesitating(britta)\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> Giving(x))\nReclusive(britta) -> Hesitating(britta)\n\nnot Giving(wilt)\n\nUnwilling(wilt) and forall x (Unwilling(x) -> Giving(x)) -> therefore Giving(wilt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Kassia is beat. Kassia is clubby. Kassia is scapular. Madge is uncombed. Madge is clubby. Madge is lapsed. Madge is scapular. All injurious, beat things are uncombed. If something is uncombed then it is acellular. If Madge is beat then Madge is acellular. If Kassia is beat then Kassia is injurious. If something is lapsed then it is acellular. If Kassia is beat then Kassia is injurious. Kassia is uncombed.", "logic": "\nBeat(kassia)\nClubby(kassia)\nScapular(kassia)\nUncombed(madge)\nClubby(madge)\nLapsed(madge)\nScapular(madge)\nforall x (Injurious(x) and Beat(x) -> Uncombed(x))\nforall x (Uncombed(x) -> Acellular(x))\nBeat(madge) -> Acellular(madge)\nBeat(kassia) -> Injurious(kassia)\nforall x (Lapsed(x) -> Acellular(x))\nBeat(kassia) -> Injurious(kassia)\n\nUncombed(kassia)\n\nBeat(kassia) and Beat(kassia) -> Injurious(kassia) -> therefore Injurious(kassia) Injurious(kassia) and Beat(kassia) and forall x (Injurious(x) and Beat(x) -> Uncombed(x)) -> therefore Uncombed(kassia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Sheffield is globular. Sheffield is abiding. Sheffield is elegant. Rosario is jain. Rosario is abiding. Rosario is recent. Rosario is elegant. All bengali, globular things are jain. If something is jain then it is pondering. If Rosario is globular then Rosario is pondering. If Sheffield is globular then Sheffield is bengali. If something is recent then it is pondering. If Sheffield is globular then Sheffield is bengali. Sheffield is not jain.", "logic": "\nGlobular(sheffield)\nAbiding(sheffield)\nElegant(sheffield)\nJain(rosario)\nAbiding(rosario)\nRecent(rosario)\nElegant(rosario)\nforall x (Bengali(x) and Globular(x) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Jain(x) -> Pondering(x))\nGlobular(rosario) -> Pondering(rosario)\nGlobular(sheffield) -> Bengali(sheffield)\nforall x (Recent(x) -> Pondering(x))\nGlobular(sheffield) -> Bengali(sheffield)\n\nnot Jain(sheffield)\n\nGlobular(sheffield) and Globular(sheffield) -> Bengali(sheffield) -> therefore Bengali(sheffield) Bengali(sheffield) and Globular(sheffield) and forall x (Bengali(x) and Globular(x) -> Jain(x)) -> therefore Jain(sheffield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Morissa is farcical. Morissa is leaded. Morissa is unbrushed. Hyatt is ergonomic. Hyatt is leaded. Hyatt is matched. Hyatt is unbrushed. All unstaged, farcical things are ergonomic. If something is ergonomic then it is undeterred. If Hyatt is farcical then Hyatt is undeterred. If Morissa is farcical then Morissa is unstaged. If something is matched then it is undeterred. If Morissa is farcical then Morissa is unstaged. Morissa is undeterred.", "logic": "\nFarcical(morissa)\nLeaded(morissa)\nUnbrushed(morissa)\nErgonomic(hyatt)\nLeaded(hyatt)\nMatched(hyatt)\nUnbrushed(hyatt)\nforall x (Unstaged(x) and Farcical(x) -> Ergonomic(x))\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) -> Undeterred(x))\nFarcical(hyatt) -> Undeterred(hyatt)\nFarcical(morissa) -> Unstaged(morissa)\nforall x (Matched(x) -> Undeterred(x))\nFarcical(morissa) -> Unstaged(morissa)\n\nUndeterred(morissa)\n\nFarcical(morissa) and Farcical(morissa) -> Unstaged(morissa) -> therefore Unstaged(morissa) Unstaged(morissa) and Farcical(morissa) and forall x (Unstaged(x) and Farcical(x) -> Ergonomic(x)) -> therefore Ergonomic(morissa) Ergonomic(morissa) and forall x (Ergonomic(x) -> Undeterred(x)) -> therefore Undeterred(morissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Onlea is untrimmed. Onlea is drowsy. Onlea is unpatented. Quinton is decrepit. Quinton is drowsy. Quinton is lilting. Quinton is unpatented. All outlandish, untrimmed things are decrepit. If something is decrepit then it is fulgid. If Quinton is untrimmed then Quinton is fulgid. If Onlea is untrimmed then Onlea is outlandish. If something is lilting then it is fulgid. If Onlea is untrimmed then Onlea is outlandish. Onlea is not fulgid.", "logic": "\nUntrimmed(onlea)\nDrowsy(onlea)\nUnpatented(onlea)\nDecrepit(quinton)\nDrowsy(quinton)\nLilting(quinton)\nUnpatented(quinton)\nforall x (Outlandish(x) and Untrimmed(x) -> Decrepit(x))\nforall x (Decrepit(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nUntrimmed(quinton) -> Fulgid(quinton)\nUntrimmed(onlea) -> Outlandish(onlea)\nforall x (Lilting(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nUntrimmed(onlea) -> Outlandish(onlea)\n\nnot Fulgid(onlea)\n\nUntrimmed(onlea) and Untrimmed(onlea) -> Outlandish(onlea) -> therefore Outlandish(onlea) Outlandish(onlea) and Untrimmed(onlea) and forall x (Outlandish(x) and Untrimmed(x) -> Decrepit(x)) -> therefore Decrepit(onlea) Decrepit(onlea) and forall x (Decrepit(x) -> Fulgid(x)) -> therefore Fulgid(onlea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Larry is protected. Larry is ectodermic. Larry is meagerly. Martina is muslim. Martina is ectodermic. Martina is dear. Martina is meagerly. All baptistic, protected things are muslim. If something is muslim then it is sclerotic. If Martina is protected then Martina is sclerotic. If Larry is protected then Larry is baptistic. If something is dear then it is sclerotic. If Larry is protected then Larry is baptistic. Martina is not baptistic.", "logic": "\nProtected(larry)\nEctodermic(larry)\nMeagerly(larry)\nMuslim(martina)\nEctodermic(martina)\nDear(martina)\nMeagerly(martina)\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Protected(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) -> Sclerotic(x))\nProtected(martina) -> Sclerotic(martina)\nProtected(larry) -> Baptistic(larry)\nforall x (Dear(x) -> Sclerotic(x))\nProtected(larry) -> Baptistic(larry)\n\nnot Baptistic(martina)\n\nnot Baptistic(martina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Casper is hypnotised. Casper is mural. Casper is alike. Marty is lunar. Marty is mural. Marty is maggoty. Marty is alike. All pelagic, hypnotised things are lunar. If something is lunar then it is unarmoured. If Marty is hypnotised then Marty is unarmoured. If Casper is hypnotised then Casper is pelagic. If something is maggoty then it is unarmoured. If Casper is hypnotised then Casper is pelagic. Casper is maggoty.", "logic": "\nHypnotised(casper)\nMural(casper)\nAlike(casper)\nLunar(marty)\nMural(marty)\nMaggoty(marty)\nAlike(marty)\nforall x (Pelagic(x) and Hypnotised(x) -> Lunar(x))\nforall x (Lunar(x) -> Unarmoured(x))\nHypnotised(marty) -> Unarmoured(marty)\nHypnotised(casper) -> Pelagic(casper)\nforall x (Maggoty(x) -> Unarmoured(x))\nHypnotised(casper) -> Pelagic(casper)\n\nMaggoty(casper)\n\nMaggoty(casper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Morley is stereo. Vince is utility. Nevins is combed. Nero is bitumenoid. If Nero is not utility then Nero is not pupillary. Green people are combed. If Nero is stereo then Nero is cantering. Quiet people are pupillary. If someone is stereo then they are pupillary. If Nevins is bitumenoid then Nevins is cantering. Rough, utility people are stereo. If Morley is stereo and Morley is not combed then Morley is pupillary. Nero is bitumenoid.", "logic": "\nStereo(morley)\nUtility(vince)\nCombed(nevins)\nBitumenoid(nero)\nnot Utility(nero) -> not Pupillary(nero)\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Combed(x))\nStereo(nero) -> Cantering(nero)\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Pupillary(x))\nforall x (Stereo(x) -> Pupillary(x))\nBitumenoid(nevins) -> Cantering(nevins)\nforall x (Combed(x) and Utility(x) -> Stereo(x))\nStereo(morley) and not Combed(morley) -> Pupillary(morley)\n\nBitumenoid(nero)\n\ntherefore Bitumenoid(nero)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Quinton is unquotable. Jesse is askant. Sander is lacerate. Collie is galled. If Collie is not askant then Collie is not somber. Green people are lacerate. If Collie is unquotable then Collie is audile. Quiet people are somber. If someone is unquotable then they are somber. If Sander is galled then Sander is audile. Rough, askant people are unquotable. If Quinton is unquotable and Quinton is not lacerate then Quinton is somber. Jesse is not askant.", "logic": "\nUnquotable(quinton)\nAskant(jesse)\nLacerate(sander)\nGalled(collie)\nnot Askant(collie) -> not Somber(collie)\nforall x (Askant(x) -> Lacerate(x))\nUnquotable(collie) -> Audile(collie)\nforall x (Priapic(x) -> Somber(x))\nforall x (Unquotable(x) -> Somber(x))\nGalled(sander) -> Audile(sander)\nforall x (Lacerate(x) and Askant(x) -> Unquotable(x))\nUnquotable(quinton) and not Lacerate(quinton) -> Somber(quinton)\n\nnot Askant(jesse)\n\ntherefore Askant(jesse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Tessie is millennian. Darcie is extendible. Higgins is obscure. Juliane is preventive. If Juliane is not extendible then Juliane is not forfeit. Green people are obscure. If Juliane is millennian then Juliane is backward. Quiet people are forfeit. If someone is millennian then they are forfeit. If Higgins is preventive then Higgins is backward. Rough, extendible people are millennian. If Tessie is millennian and Tessie is not obscure then Tessie is forfeit. Tessie is forfeit.", "logic": "\nMillennian(tessie)\nExtendible(darcie)\nObscure(higgins)\nPreventive(juliane)\nnot Extendible(juliane) -> not Forfeit(juliane)\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Obscure(x))\nMillennian(juliane) -> Backward(juliane)\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Forfeit(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) -> Forfeit(x))\nPreventive(higgins) -> Backward(higgins)\nforall x (Obscure(x) and Extendible(x) -> Millennian(x))\nMillennian(tessie) and not Obscure(tessie) -> Forfeit(tessie)\n\nForfeit(tessie)\n\nMillennian(tessie) and forall x (Millennian(x) -> Forfeit(x)) -> therefore Forfeit(tessie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Ramonda is snooty. Barb is bolshevist. Bee is sanctified. Willdon is alular. If Willdon is not bolshevist then Willdon is not spherical. Green people are sanctified. If Willdon is snooty then Willdon is mongoloid. Quiet people are spherical. If someone is snooty then they are spherical. If Bee is alular then Bee is mongoloid. Rough, bolshevist people are snooty. If Ramonda is snooty and Ramonda is not sanctified then Ramonda is spherical. Barb is not sanctified.", "logic": "\nSnooty(ramonda)\nBolshevist(barb)\nSanctified(bee)\nAlular(willdon)\nnot Bolshevist(willdon) -> not Spherical(willdon)\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Sanctified(x))\nSnooty(willdon) -> Mongoloid(willdon)\nforall x (Waxed(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Snooty(x) -> Spherical(x))\nAlular(bee) -> Mongoloid(bee)\nforall x (Sanctified(x) and Bolshevist(x) -> Snooty(x))\nSnooty(ramonda) and not Sanctified(ramonda) -> Spherical(ramonda)\n\nnot Sanctified(barb)\n\nBolshevist(barb) and forall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Sanctified(x)) -> therefore Sanctified(barb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Nidia is recent. Rachel is side. Hervey is unholy. Jany is easterly. If Jany is not side then Jany is not plus. Green people are unholy. If Jany is recent then Jany is mechanical. Quiet people are plus. If someone is recent then they are plus. If Hervey is easterly then Hervey is mechanical. Rough, side people are recent. If Nidia is recent and Nidia is not unholy then Nidia is plus. Rachel is recent.", "logic": "\nRecent(nidia)\nSide(rachel)\nUnholy(hervey)\nEasterly(jany)\nnot Side(jany) -> not Plus(jany)\nforall x (Side(x) -> Unholy(x))\nRecent(jany) -> Mechanical(jany)\nforall x (Smothered(x) -> Plus(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) -> Plus(x))\nEasterly(hervey) -> Mechanical(hervey)\nforall x (Unholy(x) and Side(x) -> Recent(x))\nRecent(nidia) and not Unholy(nidia) -> Plus(nidia)\n\nRecent(rachel)\n\nSide(rachel) and forall x (Side(x) -> Unholy(x)) -> therefore Unholy(rachel) Unholy(rachel) and Side(rachel) and forall x (Unholy(x) and Side(x) -> Recent(x)) -> therefore Recent(rachel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Huntlee is halfway. Johnny is biaural. Frederik is pinnated. Tiff is selective. If Tiff is not biaural then Tiff is not speechless. Green people are pinnated. If Tiff is halfway then Tiff is structured. Quiet people are speechless. If someone is halfway then they are speechless. If Frederik is selective then Frederik is structured. Rough, biaural people are halfway. If Huntlee is halfway and Huntlee is not pinnated then Huntlee is speechless. Johnny is not halfway.", "logic": "\nHalfway(huntlee)\nBiaural(johnny)\nPinnated(frederik)\nSelective(tiff)\nnot Biaural(tiff) -> not Speechless(tiff)\nforall x (Biaural(x) -> Pinnated(x))\nHalfway(tiff) -> Structured(tiff)\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Speechless(x))\nforall x (Halfway(x) -> Speechless(x))\nSelective(frederik) -> Structured(frederik)\nforall x (Pinnated(x) and Biaural(x) -> Halfway(x))\nHalfway(huntlee) and not Pinnated(huntlee) -> Speechless(huntlee)\n\nnot Halfway(johnny)\n\nBiaural(johnny) and forall x (Biaural(x) -> Pinnated(x)) -> therefore Pinnated(johnny) Pinnated(johnny) and Biaural(johnny) and forall x (Pinnated(x) and Biaural(x) -> Halfway(x)) -> therefore Halfway(johnny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Selina is epitheliod. Hedi is scrotal. Lincoln is unclear. Odelinda is pleural. If Odelinda is not scrotal then Odelinda is not immaterial. Green people are unclear. If Odelinda is epitheliod then Odelinda is blustering. Quiet people are immaterial. If someone is epitheliod then they are immaterial. If Lincoln is pleural then Lincoln is blustering. Rough, scrotal people are epitheliod. If Selina is epitheliod and Selina is not unclear then Selina is immaterial. Hedi is immaterial.", "logic": "\nEpitheliod(selina)\nScrotal(hedi)\nUnclear(lincoln)\nPleural(odelinda)\nnot Scrotal(odelinda) -> not Immaterial(odelinda)\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> Unclear(x))\nEpitheliod(odelinda) -> Blustering(odelinda)\nforall x (Withering(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nPleural(lincoln) -> Blustering(lincoln)\nforall x (Unclear(x) and Scrotal(x) -> Epitheliod(x))\nEpitheliod(selina) and not Unclear(selina) -> Immaterial(selina)\n\nImmaterial(hedi)\n\nScrotal(hedi) and forall x (Scrotal(x) -> Unclear(x)) -> therefore Unclear(hedi) Unclear(hedi) and Scrotal(hedi) and forall x (Unclear(x) and Scrotal(x) -> Epitheliod(x)) -> therefore Epitheliod(hedi) Epitheliod(hedi) and forall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Immaterial(x)) -> therefore Immaterial(hedi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Israel is sunburned. Kincaid is malign. Sheffie is pitiable. Tobe is ninth. If Tobe is not malign then Tobe is not jittery. Green people are pitiable. If Tobe is sunburned then Tobe is tawny. Quiet people are jittery. If someone is sunburned then they are jittery. If Sheffie is ninth then Sheffie is tawny. Rough, malign people are sunburned. If Israel is sunburned and Israel is not pitiable then Israel is jittery. Kincaid is not jittery.", "logic": "\nSunburned(israel)\nMalign(kincaid)\nPitiable(sheffie)\nNinth(tobe)\nnot Malign(tobe) -> not Jittery(tobe)\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nSunburned(tobe) -> Tawny(tobe)\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Jittery(x))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) -> Jittery(x))\nNinth(sheffie) -> Tawny(sheffie)\nforall x (Pitiable(x) and Malign(x) -> Sunburned(x))\nSunburned(israel) and not Pitiable(israel) -> Jittery(israel)\n\nnot Jittery(kincaid)\n\nMalign(kincaid) and forall x (Malign(x) -> Pitiable(x)) -> therefore Pitiable(kincaid) Pitiable(kincaid) and Malign(kincaid) and forall x (Pitiable(x) and Malign(x) -> Sunburned(x)) -> therefore Sunburned(kincaid) Sunburned(kincaid) and forall x (Sunburned(x) -> Jittery(x)) -> therefore Jittery(kincaid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Mauricio is goddamned. Yaakov is slavic. Elna is built. Merrill is ossicular. If Merrill is not slavic then Merrill is not strangled. Green people are built. If Merrill is goddamned then Merrill is unsexy. Quiet people are strangled. If someone is goddamned then they are strangled. If Elna is ossicular then Elna is unsexy. Rough, slavic people are goddamned. If Mauricio is goddamned and Mauricio is not built then Mauricio is strangled. Elna is not goddamned.", "logic": "\nGoddamned(mauricio)\nSlavic(yaakov)\nBuilt(elna)\nOssicular(merrill)\nnot Slavic(merrill) -> not Strangled(merrill)\nforall x (Slavic(x) -> Built(x))\nGoddamned(merrill) -> Unsexy(merrill)\nforall x (Rewarding(x) -> Strangled(x))\nforall x (Goddamned(x) -> Strangled(x))\nOssicular(elna) -> Unsexy(elna)\nforall x (Built(x) and Slavic(x) -> Goddamned(x))\nGoddamned(mauricio) and not Built(mauricio) -> Strangled(mauricio)\n\nnot Goddamned(elna)\n\nforall x (Built(x) and Slavic(x) -> Goddamned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Bessie is anorthic. Anson is monitory. Ainslie is glamourous. Emmaline is girlish. If Emmaline is not monitory then Emmaline is not rising. Green people are glamourous. If Emmaline is anorthic then Emmaline is enteric. Quiet people are rising. If someone is anorthic then they are rising. If Ainslie is girlish then Ainslie is enteric. Rough, monitory people are anorthic. If Bessie is anorthic and Bessie is not glamourous then Bessie is rising. Ainslie is enteric.", "logic": "\nAnorthic(bessie)\nMonitory(anson)\nGlamourous(ainslie)\nGirlish(emmaline)\nnot Monitory(emmaline) -> not Rising(emmaline)\nforall x (Monitory(x) -> Glamourous(x))\nAnorthic(emmaline) -> Enteric(emmaline)\nforall x (Amerind(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Anorthic(x) -> Rising(x))\nGirlish(ainslie) -> Enteric(ainslie)\nforall x (Glamourous(x) and Monitory(x) -> Anorthic(x))\nAnorthic(bessie) and not Glamourous(bessie) -> Rising(bessie)\n\nEnteric(ainslie)\n\nGirlish(ainslie) -> Enteric(ainslie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Farra is stratified. Deryl is bizarre. Kaleb is sedgy. Micheline is unforested. If Micheline is not bizarre then Micheline is not oppressed. Green people are sedgy. If Micheline is stratified then Micheline is zymotic. Quiet people are oppressed. If someone is stratified then they are oppressed. If Kaleb is unforested then Kaleb is zymotic. Rough, bizarre people are stratified. If Farra is stratified and Farra is not sedgy then Farra is oppressed. Micheline is not oppressed.", "logic": "\nStratified(farra)\nBizarre(deryl)\nSedgy(kaleb)\nUnforested(micheline)\nnot Bizarre(micheline) -> not Oppressed(micheline)\nforall x (Bizarre(x) -> Sedgy(x))\nStratified(micheline) -> Zymotic(micheline)\nforall x (Unratified(x) -> Oppressed(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) -> Oppressed(x))\nUnforested(kaleb) -> Zymotic(kaleb)\nforall x (Sedgy(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Stratified(x))\nStratified(farra) and not Sedgy(farra) -> Oppressed(farra)\n\nnot Oppressed(micheline)\n\nforall x (Stratified(x) -> Oppressed(x)) <- forall x (Sedgy(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Stratified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Devondra is pureblood. Duffy is juxtaposed. Ignacius is touchable. Siegfried is probative. If Siegfried is not juxtaposed then Siegfried is not carbuncled. Green people are touchable. If Siegfried is pureblood then Siegfried is filariid. Quiet people are carbuncled. If someone is pureblood then they are carbuncled. If Ignacius is probative then Ignacius is filariid. Rough, juxtaposed people are pureblood. If Devondra is pureblood and Devondra is not touchable then Devondra is carbuncled. Siegfried is filariid.", "logic": "\nPureblood(devondra)\nJuxtaposed(duffy)\nTouchable(ignacius)\nProbative(siegfried)\nnot Juxtaposed(siegfried) -> not Carbuncled(siegfried)\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Touchable(x))\nPureblood(siegfried) -> Filariid(siegfried)\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Carbuncled(x))\nforall x (Pureblood(x) -> Carbuncled(x))\nProbative(ignacius) -> Filariid(ignacius)\nforall x (Touchable(x) and Juxtaposed(x) -> Pureblood(x))\nPureblood(devondra) and not Touchable(devondra) -> Carbuncled(devondra)\n\nFilariid(siegfried)\n\nPureblood(siegfried) -> Filariid(siegfried) <- forall x (Touchable(x) and Juxtaposed(x) -> Pureblood(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Jaquelin is curly. Georgena is alluring. Almeda is unlikable. Hermy is molten. If Hermy is not alluring then Hermy is not humbling. Green people are unlikable. If Hermy is curly then Hermy is brutish. Quiet people are humbling. If someone is curly then they are humbling. If Almeda is molten then Almeda is brutish. Rough, alluring people are curly. If Jaquelin is curly and Jaquelin is not unlikable then Jaquelin is humbling. Georgena is not brutish.", "logic": "\nCurly(jaquelin)\nAlluring(georgena)\nUnlikable(almeda)\nMolten(hermy)\nnot Alluring(hermy) -> not Humbling(hermy)\nforall x (Alluring(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nCurly(hermy) -> Brutish(hermy)\nforall x (Weaponed(x) -> Humbling(x))\nforall x (Curly(x) -> Humbling(x))\nMolten(almeda) -> Brutish(almeda)\nforall x (Unlikable(x) and Alluring(x) -> Curly(x))\nCurly(jaquelin) and not Unlikable(jaquelin) -> Humbling(jaquelin)\n\nnot Brutish(georgena)\n\nnot Brutish(georgena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Kim is dolomitic. Isobel is lendable. Leticia is bluff. Sybille is macaronic. If Sybille is not lendable then Sybille is not legible. Green people are bluff. If Sybille is dolomitic then Sybille is telluric. Quiet people are legible. If someone is dolomitic then they are legible. If Leticia is macaronic then Leticia is telluric. Rough, lendable people are dolomitic. If Kim is dolomitic and Kim is not bluff then Kim is legible. Kim is torulose.", "logic": "\nDolomitic(kim)\nLendable(isobel)\nBluff(leticia)\nMacaronic(sybille)\nnot Lendable(sybille) -> not Legible(sybille)\nforall x (Lendable(x) -> Bluff(x))\nDolomitic(sybille) -> Telluric(sybille)\nforall x (Torulose(x) -> Legible(x))\nforall x (Dolomitic(x) -> Legible(x))\nMacaronic(leticia) -> Telluric(leticia)\nforall x (Bluff(x) and Lendable(x) -> Dolomitic(x))\nDolomitic(kim) and not Bluff(kim) -> Legible(kim)\n\nTorulose(kim)\n\nTorulose(kim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Darrell is looted. Deeann is musing. Henka is nostalgic. Liana is metabolic. If Liana is not musing then Liana is not discrete. Green people are nostalgic. If Liana is looted then Liana is ribless. Quiet people are discrete. If someone is looted then they are discrete. If Henka is metabolic then Henka is ribless. Rough, musing people are looted. If Darrell is looted and Darrell is not nostalgic then Darrell is discrete. Deeann is not metabolic.", "logic": "\nLooted(darrell)\nMusing(deeann)\nNostalgic(henka)\nMetabolic(liana)\nnot Musing(liana) -> not Discrete(liana)\nforall x (Musing(x) -> Nostalgic(x))\nLooted(liana) -> Ribless(liana)\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Discrete(x))\nforall x (Looted(x) -> Discrete(x))\nMetabolic(henka) -> Ribless(henka)\nforall x (Nostalgic(x) and Musing(x) -> Looted(x))\nLooted(darrell) and not Nostalgic(darrell) -> Discrete(darrell)\n\nnot Metabolic(deeann)\n\nnot Metabolic(deeann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Caldwell is drilled. Turner is blurred. Rubin is eradicable. Lancelot is encysted. If Lancelot is not blurred then Lancelot is not matching. Green people are eradicable. If Lancelot is drilled then Lancelot is gathered. Quiet people are matching. If someone is drilled then they are matching. If Rubin is encysted then Rubin is gathered. Rough, blurred people are drilled. If Caldwell is drilled and Caldwell is not eradicable then Caldwell is matching. Rubin is blurred.", "logic": "\nDrilled(caldwell)\nBlurred(turner)\nEradicable(rubin)\nEncysted(lancelot)\nnot Blurred(lancelot) -> not Matching(lancelot)\nforall x (Blurred(x) -> Eradicable(x))\nDrilled(lancelot) -> Gathered(lancelot)\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Drilled(x) -> Matching(x))\nEncysted(rubin) -> Gathered(rubin)\nforall x (Eradicable(x) and Blurred(x) -> Drilled(x))\nDrilled(caldwell) and not Eradicable(caldwell) -> Matching(caldwell)\n\nBlurred(rubin)\n\nBlurred(rubin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "The beowulf mentor the kimberli. The beowulf is grimy. The kimberli shear the beowulf. If something diss the kimberli then it mentor the kimberli. If something mentor the kimberli and the kimberli diss the beowulf then the kimberli is not cxxv. If something shear the kimberli then it is monarchal. If something shear the beowulf then it shear the kimberli. All monarchal things are cxxv. If something shear the kimberli and the kimberli does not see the beowulf then the beowulf is not cxxv. The beowulf is grimy.", "logic": "\nMentor(beowulf, kimberli)\nGrimy(beowulf)\nShear(kimberli, beowulf)\nforall x (Diss(x, kimberli) -> Mentor(x, kimberli))\nforall x (Mentor(x, kimberli) and Diss(kimberli, beowulf) -> not Cxxv(kimberli))\nforall x (Shear(x, kimberli) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Shear(x, beowulf) -> Shear(x, kimberli))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) -> Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Shear(x, kimberli) and not Shear(kimberli, beowulf) -> not Cxxv(beowulf))\n\nGrimy(beowulf)\n\ntherefore Grimy(beowulf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The rey copyread the roseann. The rey is heretical. The roseann bastardise the rey. If something impel the roseann then it copyread the roseann. If something copyread the roseann and the roseann impel the rey then the roseann is not unbendable. If something bastardise the roseann then it is tiled. If something bastardise the rey then it bastardise the roseann. All tiled things are unbendable. If something bastardise the roseann and the roseann does not see the rey then the rey is not unbendable. The rey does not eat the roseann.", "logic": "\nCopyread(rey, roseann)\nHeretical(rey)\nBastardise(roseann, rey)\nforall x (Impel(x, roseann) -> Copyread(x, roseann))\nforall x (Copyread(x, roseann) and Impel(roseann, rey) -> not Unbendable(roseann))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, roseann) -> Tiled(x))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, rey) -> Bastardise(x, roseann))\nforall x (Tiled(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, roseann) and not Bastardise(roseann, rey) -> not Unbendable(rey))\n\nnot Copyread(rey, roseann)\n\ntherefore Copyread(rey, roseann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The dolley corn the liane. The dolley is resolved. The liane mobilise the dolley. If something realise the liane then it corn the liane. If something corn the liane and the liane realise the dolley then the liane is not populous. If something mobilise the liane then it is virucidal. If something mobilise the dolley then it mobilise the liane. All virucidal things are populous. If something mobilise the liane and the liane does not see the dolley then the dolley is not populous. The liane mobilise the liane.", "logic": "\nCorn(dolley, liane)\nResolved(dolley)\nMobilise(liane, dolley)\nforall x (Realise(x, liane) -> Corn(x, liane))\nforall x (Corn(x, liane) and Realise(liane, dolley) -> not Populous(liane))\nforall x (Mobilise(x, liane) -> Virucidal(x))\nforall x (Mobilise(x, dolley) -> Mobilise(x, liane))\nforall x (Virucidal(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Mobilise(x, liane) and not Mobilise(liane, dolley) -> not Populous(dolley))\n\nMobilise(liane, liane)\n\nMobilise(liane, dolley) and forall x (Mobilise(x, dolley) -> Mobilise(x, liane)) -> therefore Mobilise(liane, liane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The rasla dwell the kitty. The rasla is resinlike. The kitty chevvy the rasla. If something buff the kitty then it dwell the kitty. If something dwell the kitty and the kitty buff the rasla then the kitty is not collateral. If something chevvy the kitty then it is volumetric. If something chevvy the rasla then it chevvy the kitty. All volumetric things are collateral. If something chevvy the kitty and the kitty does not see the rasla then the rasla is not collateral. The kitty does not see the kitty.", "logic": "\nDwell(rasla, kitty)\nResinlike(rasla)\nChevvy(kitty, rasla)\nforall x (Buff(x, kitty) -> Dwell(x, kitty))\nforall x (Dwell(x, kitty) and Buff(kitty, rasla) -> not Collateral(kitty))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, kitty) -> Volumetric(x))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, rasla) -> Chevvy(x, kitty))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) -> Collateral(x))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, kitty) and not Chevvy(kitty, rasla) -> not Collateral(rasla))\n\nnot Chevvy(kitty, kitty)\n\nChevvy(kitty, rasla) and forall x (Chevvy(x, rasla) -> Chevvy(x, kitty)) -> therefore Chevvy(kitty, kitty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The zollie redeploy the suzann. The zollie is nude. The suzann niggle the zollie. If something silt the suzann then it redeploy the suzann. If something redeploy the suzann and the suzann silt the zollie then the suzann is not wholemeal. If something niggle the suzann then it is basilar. If something niggle the zollie then it niggle the suzann. All basilar things are wholemeal. If something niggle the suzann and the suzann does not see the zollie then the zollie is not wholemeal. The suzann is basilar.", "logic": "\nRedeploy(zollie, suzann)\nNude(zollie)\nNiggle(suzann, zollie)\nforall x (Silt(x, suzann) -> Redeploy(x, suzann))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, suzann) and Silt(suzann, zollie) -> not Wholemeal(suzann))\nforall x (Niggle(x, suzann) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Niggle(x, zollie) -> Niggle(x, suzann))\nforall x (Basilar(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Niggle(x, suzann) and not Niggle(suzann, zollie) -> not Wholemeal(zollie))\n\nBasilar(suzann)\n\nNiggle(suzann, zollie) and forall x (Niggle(x, zollie) -> Niggle(x, suzann)) -> therefore Niggle(suzann, suzann) Niggle(suzann, suzann) and forall x (Niggle(x, suzann) -> Basilar(x)) -> therefore Basilar(suzann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The joice exhibit the marylee. The joice is venetian. The marylee josh the joice. If something merit the marylee then it exhibit the marylee. If something exhibit the marylee and the marylee merit the joice then the marylee is not futureless. If something josh the marylee then it is botonee. If something josh the joice then it josh the marylee. All botonee things are futureless. If something josh the marylee and the marylee does not see the joice then the joice is not futureless. The marylee is not botonee.", "logic": "\nExhibit(joice, marylee)\nVenetian(joice)\nJosh(marylee, joice)\nforall x (Merit(x, marylee) -> Exhibit(x, marylee))\nforall x (Exhibit(x, marylee) and Merit(marylee, joice) -> not Futureless(marylee))\nforall x (Josh(x, marylee) -> Botonee(x))\nforall x (Josh(x, joice) -> Josh(x, marylee))\nforall x (Botonee(x) -> Futureless(x))\nforall x (Josh(x, marylee) and not Josh(marylee, joice) -> not Futureless(joice))\n\nnot Botonee(marylee)\n\nJosh(marylee, joice) and forall x (Josh(x, joice) -> Josh(x, marylee)) -> therefore Josh(marylee, marylee) Josh(marylee, marylee) and forall x (Josh(x, marylee) -> Botonee(x)) -> therefore Botonee(marylee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The talbot profile the demetria. The talbot is avertable. The demetria aphorise the talbot. If something sort the demetria then it profile the demetria. If something profile the demetria and the demetria sort the talbot then the demetria is not anorthitic. If something aphorise the demetria then it is suave. If something aphorise the talbot then it aphorise the demetria. All suave things are anorthitic. If something aphorise the demetria and the demetria does not see the talbot then the talbot is not anorthitic. The demetria is anorthitic.", "logic": "\nProfile(talbot, demetria)\nAvertable(talbot)\nAphorise(demetria, talbot)\nforall x (Sort(x, demetria) -> Profile(x, demetria))\nforall x (Profile(x, demetria) and Sort(demetria, talbot) -> not Anorthitic(demetria))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, demetria) -> Suave(x))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, talbot) -> Aphorise(x, demetria))\nforall x (Suave(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, demetria) and not Aphorise(demetria, talbot) -> not Anorthitic(talbot))\n\nAnorthitic(demetria)\n\nAphorise(demetria, talbot) and forall x (Aphorise(x, talbot) -> Aphorise(x, demetria)) -> therefore Aphorise(demetria, demetria) Aphorise(demetria, demetria) and forall x (Aphorise(x, demetria) -> Suave(x)) -> therefore Suave(demetria) Suave(demetria) and forall x (Suave(x) -> Anorthitic(x)) -> therefore Anorthitic(demetria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The bayard caramelize the aurora. The bayard is lacelike. The aurora parlay the bayard. If something establish the aurora then it caramelize the aurora. If something caramelize the aurora and the aurora establish the bayard then the aurora is not linear. If something parlay the aurora then it is gossipy. If something parlay the bayard then it parlay the aurora. All gossipy things are linear. If something parlay the aurora and the aurora does not see the bayard then the bayard is not linear. The aurora is not linear.", "logic": "\nCaramelize(bayard, aurora)\nLacelike(bayard)\nParlay(aurora, bayard)\nforall x (Establish(x, aurora) -> Caramelize(x, aurora))\nforall x (Caramelize(x, aurora) and Establish(aurora, bayard) -> not Linear(aurora))\nforall x (Parlay(x, aurora) -> Gossipy(x))\nforall x (Parlay(x, bayard) -> Parlay(x, aurora))\nforall x (Gossipy(x) -> Linear(x))\nforall x (Parlay(x, aurora) and not Parlay(aurora, bayard) -> not Linear(bayard))\n\nnot Linear(aurora)\n\nParlay(aurora, bayard) and forall x (Parlay(x, bayard) -> Parlay(x, aurora)) -> therefore Parlay(aurora, aurora) Parlay(aurora, aurora) and forall x (Parlay(x, aurora) -> Gossipy(x)) -> therefore Gossipy(aurora) Gossipy(aurora) and forall x (Gossipy(x) -> Linear(x)) -> therefore Linear(aurora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The brea redispose the maxi. The brea is obsessed. The maxi hole the brea. If something bother the maxi then it redispose the maxi. If something redispose the maxi and the maxi bother the brea then the maxi is not darkening. If something hole the maxi then it is bronchial. If something hole the brea then it hole the maxi. All bronchial things are darkening. If something hole the maxi and the maxi does not see the brea then the brea is not darkening. The maxi does not eat the maxi.", "logic": "\nRedispose(brea, maxi)\nObsessed(brea)\nHole(maxi, brea)\nforall x (Bother(x, maxi) -> Redispose(x, maxi))\nforall x (Redispose(x, maxi) and Bother(maxi, brea) -> not Darkening(maxi))\nforall x (Hole(x, maxi) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Hole(x, brea) -> Hole(x, maxi))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Darkening(x))\nforall x (Hole(x, maxi) and not Hole(maxi, brea) -> not Darkening(brea))\n\nnot Redispose(maxi, maxi)\n\nforall x (Bother(x, maxi) -> Redispose(x, maxi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The bishop bastardise the vin. The bishop is underdone. The vin volatilise the bishop. If something centrifuge the vin then it bastardise the vin. If something bastardise the vin and the vin centrifuge the bishop then the vin is not draped. If something volatilise the vin then it is damnable. If something volatilise the bishop then it volatilise the vin. All damnable things are draped. If something volatilise the vin and the vin does not see the bishop then the bishop is not draped. The bishop is draped.", "logic": "\nBastardise(bishop, vin)\nUnderdone(bishop)\nVolatilise(vin, bishop)\nforall x (Centrifuge(x, vin) -> Bastardise(x, vin))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, vin) and Centrifuge(vin, bishop) -> not Draped(vin))\nforall x (Volatilise(x, vin) -> Damnable(x))\nforall x (Volatilise(x, bishop) -> Volatilise(x, vin))\nforall x (Damnable(x) -> Draped(x))\nforall x (Volatilise(x, vin) and not Volatilise(vin, bishop) -> not Draped(bishop))\n\nDraped(bishop)\n\nforall x (Damnable(x) -> Draped(x)) <- forall x (Volatilise(x, vin) -> Damnable(x)) <- forall x (Volatilise(x, bishop) -> Volatilise(x, vin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The brewer amend the maegan. The brewer is endearing. The maegan nail the brewer. If something steamroll the maegan then it amend the maegan. If something amend the maegan and the maegan steamroll the brewer then the maegan is not symbolic. If something nail the maegan then it is flaky. If something nail the brewer then it nail the maegan. All flaky things are symbolic. If something nail the maegan and the maegan does not see the brewer then the brewer is not symbolic. The brewer does not see the maegan.", "logic": "\nAmend(brewer, maegan)\nEndearing(brewer)\nNail(maegan, brewer)\nforall x (Steamroll(x, maegan) -> Amend(x, maegan))\nforall x (Amend(x, maegan) and Steamroll(maegan, brewer) -> not Symbolic(maegan))\nforall x (Nail(x, maegan) -> Flaky(x))\nforall x (Nail(x, brewer) -> Nail(x, maegan))\nforall x (Flaky(x) -> Symbolic(x))\nforall x (Nail(x, maegan) and not Nail(maegan, brewer) -> not Symbolic(brewer))\n\nnot Nail(brewer, maegan)\n\nforall x (Nail(x, brewer) -> Nail(x, maegan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The anthia supervise the iormina. The anthia is anorthic. The iormina whet the anthia. If something disinvest the iormina then it supervise the iormina. If something supervise the iormina and the iormina disinvest the anthia then the iormina is not analyzable. If something whet the iormina then it is beaklike. If something whet the anthia then it whet the iormina. All beaklike things are analyzable. If something whet the iormina and the iormina does not see the anthia then the anthia is not analyzable. The anthia is beaklike.", "logic": "\nSupervise(anthia, iormina)\nAnorthic(anthia)\nWhet(iormina, anthia)\nforall x (Disinvest(x, iormina) -> Supervise(x, iormina))\nforall x (Supervise(x, iormina) and Disinvest(iormina, anthia) -> not Analyzable(iormina))\nforall x (Whet(x, iormina) -> Beaklike(x))\nforall x (Whet(x, anthia) -> Whet(x, iormina))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Analyzable(x))\nforall x (Whet(x, iormina) and not Whet(iormina, anthia) -> not Analyzable(anthia))\n\nBeaklike(anthia)\n\nforall x (Whet(x, iormina) -> Beaklike(x)) <- forall x (Whet(x, anthia) -> Whet(x, iormina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The desirae fullback the bradly. The desirae is postmodern. The bradly determine the desirae. If something shackle the bradly then it fullback the bradly. If something fullback the bradly and the bradly shackle the desirae then the bradly is not seriocomic. If something determine the bradly then it is simple. If something determine the desirae then it determine the bradly. All simple things are seriocomic. If something determine the bradly and the bradly does not see the desirae then the desirae is not seriocomic. The desirae is not kind.", "logic": "\nFullback(desirae, bradly)\nPostmodern(desirae)\nDetermine(bradly, desirae)\nforall x (Shackle(x, bradly) -> Fullback(x, bradly))\nforall x (Fullback(x, bradly) and Shackle(bradly, desirae) -> not Seriocomic(bradly))\nforall x (Determine(x, bradly) -> Simple(x))\nforall x (Determine(x, desirae) -> Determine(x, bradly))\nforall x (Simple(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\nforall x (Determine(x, bradly) and not Determine(bradly, desirae) -> not Seriocomic(desirae))\n\nnot Kind(desirae)\n\nnot Kind(desirae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The winston inactivate the maiga. The winston is arbitrary. The maiga devaluate the winston. If something acetylate the maiga then it inactivate the maiga. If something inactivate the maiga and the maiga acetylate the winston then the maiga is not initial. If something devaluate the maiga then it is cloisonne. If something devaluate the winston then it devaluate the maiga. All cloisonne things are initial. If something devaluate the maiga and the maiga does not see the winston then the winston is not initial. The maiga inactivate the winston.", "logic": "\nInactivate(winston, maiga)\nArbitrary(winston)\nDevaluate(maiga, winston)\nforall x (Acetylate(x, maiga) -> Inactivate(x, maiga))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, maiga) and Acetylate(maiga, winston) -> not Initial(maiga))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, maiga) -> Cloisonne(x))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, winston) -> Devaluate(x, maiga))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Initial(x))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, maiga) and not Devaluate(maiga, winston) -> not Initial(winston))\n\nInactivate(maiga, winston)\n\nInactivate(maiga, winston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The collins absolve the ricardo. The collins is blithesome. The ricardo summarize the collins. If something gawk the ricardo then it absolve the ricardo. If something absolve the ricardo and the ricardo gawk the collins then the ricardo is not furnished. If something summarize the ricardo then it is ungusseted. If something summarize the collins then it summarize the ricardo. All ungusseted things are furnished. If something summarize the ricardo and the ricardo does not see the collins then the collins is not furnished. The ricardo does not like the collins.", "logic": "\nAbsolve(collins, ricardo)\nBlithesome(collins)\nSummarize(ricardo, collins)\nforall x (Gawk(x, ricardo) -> Absolve(x, ricardo))\nforall x (Absolve(x, ricardo) and Gawk(ricardo, collins) -> not Furnished(ricardo))\nforall x (Summarize(x, ricardo) -> Ungusseted(x))\nforall x (Summarize(x, collins) -> Summarize(x, ricardo))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) -> Furnished(x))\nforall x (Summarize(x, ricardo) and not Summarize(ricardo, collins) -> not Furnished(collins))\n\nnot Gawk(ricardo, collins)\n\nnot Gawk(ricardo, collins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The sena dislocate the cindra. The sena is guttural. The cindra clarify the sena. If something curb the cindra then it dislocate the cindra. If something dislocate the cindra and the cindra curb the sena then the cindra is not semestrial. If something clarify the cindra then it is aerobic. If something clarify the sena then it clarify the cindra. All aerobic things are semestrial. If something clarify the cindra and the cindra does not see the sena then the sena is not semestrial. The sena is red.", "logic": "\nDislocate(sena, cindra)\nGuttural(sena)\nClarify(cindra, sena)\nforall x (Curb(x, cindra) -> Dislocate(x, cindra))\nforall x (Dislocate(x, cindra) and Curb(cindra, sena) -> not Semestrial(cindra))\nforall x (Clarify(x, cindra) -> Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Clarify(x, sena) -> Clarify(x, cindra))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Clarify(x, cindra) and not Clarify(cindra, sena) -> not Semestrial(sena))\n\nRed(sena)\n\nRed(sena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "Kalina is forgiving. Kalina is pocketable. Kalina is recurring. Shaughn is venial. Herrick is fried. Margo is venial. Margo is recurring. All plundered, pocketable people are recurring. All pocketable people are plundered. All fried, alluvial people are plundered. If someone is plundered and recurring then they are alluvial. If someone is pocketable and recurring then they are plundered. If someone is alluvial then they are fried. Kalina is pocketable.", "logic": "\nForgiving(kalina)\nPocketable(kalina)\nRecurring(kalina)\nVenial(shaughn)\nFried(herrick)\nVenial(margo)\nRecurring(margo)\nforall x (Plundered(x) and Pocketable(x) -> Recurring(x))\nforall x (Pocketable(x) -> Plundered(x))\nforall x (Fried(x) and Alluvial(x) -> Plundered(x))\nforall x (Plundered(x) and Recurring(x) -> Alluvial(x))\nforall x (Pocketable(x) and Recurring(x) -> Plundered(x))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) -> Fried(x))\n\nPocketable(kalina)\n\ntherefore Pocketable(kalina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Melanie is araceous. Melanie is stealthy. Melanie is abkhazian. Arlie is dioecian. Murdoch is thousandth. Ondrea is dioecian. Ondrea is abkhazian. All wormy, stealthy people are abkhazian. All stealthy people are wormy. All thousandth, paperlike people are wormy. If someone is wormy and abkhazian then they are paperlike. If someone is stealthy and abkhazian then they are wormy. If someone is paperlike then they are thousandth. Murdoch is not thousandth.", "logic": "\nAraceous(melanie)\nStealthy(melanie)\nAbkhazian(melanie)\nDioecian(arlie)\nThousandth(murdoch)\nDioecian(ondrea)\nAbkhazian(ondrea)\nforall x (Wormy(x) and Stealthy(x) -> Abkhazian(x))\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Wormy(x))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Paperlike(x) -> Wormy(x))\nforall x (Wormy(x) and Abkhazian(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Stealthy(x) and Abkhazian(x) -> Wormy(x))\nforall x (Paperlike(x) -> Thousandth(x))\n\nnot Thousandth(murdoch)\n\ntherefore Thousandth(murdoch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Wendie is uncultured. Wendie is groomed. Wendie is smoky. Velma is piquant. Karlotte is xcvi. Pearl is piquant. Pearl is smoky. All indonesian, groomed people are smoky. All groomed people are indonesian. All xcvi, assumed people are indonesian. If someone is indonesian and smoky then they are assumed. If someone is groomed and smoky then they are indonesian. If someone is assumed then they are xcvi. Wendie is indonesian.", "logic": "\nUncultured(wendie)\nGroomed(wendie)\nSmoky(wendie)\nPiquant(velma)\nXcvi(karlotte)\nPiquant(pearl)\nSmoky(pearl)\nforall x (Indonesian(x) and Groomed(x) -> Smoky(x))\nforall x (Groomed(x) -> Indonesian(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) and Assumed(x) -> Indonesian(x))\nforall x (Indonesian(x) and Smoky(x) -> Assumed(x))\nforall x (Groomed(x) and Smoky(x) -> Indonesian(x))\nforall x (Assumed(x) -> Xcvi(x))\n\nIndonesian(wendie)\n\nGroomed(wendie) and forall x (Groomed(x) -> Indonesian(x)) -> therefore Indonesian(wendie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Dora is pointed. Dora is crustose. Dora is tolerable. Dorolisa is lank. Theadora is tortuous. Daphne is lank. Daphne is tolerable. All wriggling, crustose people are tolerable. All crustose people are wriggling. All tortuous, liberated people are wriggling. If someone is wriggling and tolerable then they are liberated. If someone is crustose and tolerable then they are wriggling. If someone is liberated then they are tortuous. Dora is not wriggling.", "logic": "\nPointed(dora)\nCrustose(dora)\nTolerable(dora)\nLank(dorolisa)\nTortuous(theadora)\nLank(daphne)\nTolerable(daphne)\nforall x (Wriggling(x) and Crustose(x) -> Tolerable(x))\nforall x (Crustose(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nforall x (Tortuous(x) and Liberated(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) and Tolerable(x) -> Liberated(x))\nforall x (Crustose(x) and Tolerable(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) -> Tortuous(x))\n\nnot Wriggling(dora)\n\nCrustose(dora) and forall x (Crustose(x) -> Wriggling(x)) -> therefore Wriggling(dora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Diego is cytotoxic. Diego is notorious. Diego is accustomed. Ford is portentous. Estella is bantering. Irma is portentous. Irma is accustomed. All unfeeling, notorious people are accustomed. All notorious people are unfeeling. All bantering, common people are unfeeling. If someone is unfeeling and accustomed then they are common. If someone is notorious and accustomed then they are unfeeling. If someone is common then they are bantering. Diego is common.", "logic": "\nCytotoxic(diego)\nNotorious(diego)\nAccustomed(diego)\nPortentous(ford)\nBantering(estella)\nPortentous(irma)\nAccustomed(irma)\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) and Notorious(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Notorious(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) and Common(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) and Accustomed(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Notorious(x) and Accustomed(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Common(x) -> Bantering(x))\n\nCommon(diego)\n\nNotorious(diego) and forall x (Notorious(x) -> Unfeeling(x)) -> therefore Unfeeling(diego) Unfeeling(diego) and Accustomed(diego) and forall x (Unfeeling(x) and Accustomed(x) -> Common(x)) -> therefore Common(diego)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Megen is unstaged. Megen is copulative. Megen is cadastral. Arleta is ciliary. Anais is rockbound. Julio is ciliary. Julio is cadastral. All frigorific, copulative people are cadastral. All copulative people are frigorific. All rockbound, dimmed people are frigorific. If someone is frigorific and cadastral then they are dimmed. If someone is copulative and cadastral then they are frigorific. If someone is dimmed then they are rockbound. Megen is not dimmed.", "logic": "\nUnstaged(megen)\nCopulative(megen)\nCadastral(megen)\nCiliary(arleta)\nRockbound(anais)\nCiliary(julio)\nCadastral(julio)\nforall x (Frigorific(x) and Copulative(x) -> Cadastral(x))\nforall x (Copulative(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Rockbound(x) and Dimmed(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) and Cadastral(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Copulative(x) and Cadastral(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Dimmed(x) -> Rockbound(x))\n\nnot Dimmed(megen)\n\nCopulative(megen) and forall x (Copulative(x) -> Frigorific(x)) -> therefore Frigorific(megen) Frigorific(megen) and Cadastral(megen) and forall x (Frigorific(x) and Cadastral(x) -> Dimmed(x)) -> therefore Dimmed(megen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Annabelle is monodical. Annabelle is dazzled. Annabelle is such. Rolfe is tensional. Demetri is exposed. Winny is tensional. Winny is such. All ribless, dazzled people are such. All dazzled people are ribless. All exposed, down people are ribless. If someone is ribless and such then they are down. If someone is dazzled and such then they are ribless. If someone is down then they are exposed. Annabelle is exposed.", "logic": "\nMonodical(annabelle)\nDazzled(annabelle)\nSuch(annabelle)\nTensional(rolfe)\nExposed(demetri)\nTensional(winny)\nSuch(winny)\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Dazzled(x) -> Such(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) and Down(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Such(x) -> Down(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) and Such(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Down(x) -> Exposed(x))\n\nExposed(annabelle)\n\nDazzled(annabelle) and forall x (Dazzled(x) -> Ribless(x)) -> therefore Ribless(annabelle) Ribless(annabelle) and Such(annabelle) and forall x (Ribless(x) and Such(x) -> Down(x)) -> therefore Down(annabelle) Down(annabelle) and forall x (Down(x) -> Exposed(x)) -> therefore Exposed(annabelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Agnes is abominable. Agnes is vague. Agnes is disputable. Enrico is worldwide. Jeannine is tendinous. Nissy is worldwide. Nissy is disputable. All turbid, vague people are disputable. All vague people are turbid. All tendinous, chalybeate people are turbid. If someone is turbid and disputable then they are chalybeate. If someone is vague and disputable then they are turbid. If someone is chalybeate then they are tendinous. Agnes is not tendinous.", "logic": "\nAbominable(agnes)\nVague(agnes)\nDisputable(agnes)\nWorldwide(enrico)\nTendinous(jeannine)\nWorldwide(nissy)\nDisputable(nissy)\nforall x (Turbid(x) and Vague(x) -> Disputable(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) -> Turbid(x))\nforall x (Tendinous(x) and Chalybeate(x) -> Turbid(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) and Disputable(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) and Disputable(x) -> Turbid(x))\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) -> Tendinous(x))\n\nnot Tendinous(agnes)\n\nVague(agnes) and forall x (Vague(x) -> Turbid(x)) -> therefore Turbid(agnes) Turbid(agnes) and Disputable(agnes) and forall x (Turbid(x) and Disputable(x) -> Chalybeate(x)) -> therefore Chalybeate(agnes) Chalybeate(agnes) and forall x (Chalybeate(x) -> Tendinous(x)) -> therefore Tendinous(agnes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Eveleen is murdered. Eveleen is clubby. Eveleen is unlovely. Jen is unbleached. Caleb is incursive. Sheree is unbleached. Sheree is unlovely. All soused, clubby people are unlovely. All clubby people are soused. All incursive, truthful people are soused. If someone is soused and unlovely then they are truthful. If someone is clubby and unlovely then they are soused. If someone is truthful then they are incursive. Jen is not soused.", "logic": "\nMurdered(eveleen)\nClubby(eveleen)\nUnlovely(eveleen)\nUnbleached(jen)\nIncursive(caleb)\nUnbleached(sheree)\nUnlovely(sheree)\nforall x (Soused(x) and Clubby(x) -> Unlovely(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Incursive(x) and Truthful(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Soused(x) and Unlovely(x) -> Truthful(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) and Unlovely(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Truthful(x) -> Incursive(x))\n\nnot Soused(jen)\n\nforall x (Incursive(x) and Truthful(x) -> Soused(x)) <- forall x (Soused(x) and Unlovely(x) -> Truthful(x)) <- forall x (Clubby(x) -> Soused(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Lamont is stolid. Lamont is flip. Lamont is peptic. Laryssa is unsounded. Stearn is staminate. Allen is unsounded. Allen is peptic. All mephitic, flip people are peptic. All flip people are mephitic. All staminate, bolshy people are mephitic. If someone is mephitic and peptic then they are bolshy. If someone is flip and peptic then they are mephitic. If someone is bolshy then they are staminate. Stearn is mephitic.", "logic": "\nStolid(lamont)\nFlip(lamont)\nPeptic(lamont)\nUnsounded(laryssa)\nStaminate(stearn)\nUnsounded(allen)\nPeptic(allen)\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and Flip(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Staminate(x) and Bolshy(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and Peptic(x) -> Bolshy(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) and Peptic(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Bolshy(x) -> Staminate(x))\n\nMephitic(stearn)\n\nforall x (Staminate(x) and Bolshy(x) -> Mephitic(x)) <- forall x (Mephitic(x) and Peptic(x) -> Bolshy(x)) <- forall x (Flip(x) -> Mephitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Julee is suspect. Julee is calculated. Julee is lemony. Pacifica is leadless. Egbert is unpleasing. Nigel is leadless. Nigel is lemony. All atrip, calculated people are lemony. All calculated people are atrip. All unpleasing, gluteal people are atrip. If someone is atrip and lemony then they are gluteal. If someone is calculated and lemony then they are atrip. If someone is gluteal then they are unpleasing. Pacifica is not unpleasing.", "logic": "\nSuspect(julee)\nCalculated(julee)\nLemony(julee)\nLeadless(pacifica)\nUnpleasing(egbert)\nLeadless(nigel)\nLemony(nigel)\nforall x (Atrip(x) and Calculated(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Calculated(x) -> Atrip(x))\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) and Gluteal(x) -> Atrip(x))\nforall x (Atrip(x) and Lemony(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nforall x (Calculated(x) and Lemony(x) -> Atrip(x))\nforall x (Gluteal(x) -> Unpleasing(x))\n\nnot Unpleasing(pacifica)\n\nforall x (Gluteal(x) -> Unpleasing(x)) <- forall x (Atrip(x) and Lemony(x) -> Gluteal(x)) <- forall x (Calculated(x) -> Atrip(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Camilla is cruciform. Camilla is immanent. Camilla is slipshod. Maggy is enlivened. Verna is deniable. Lavinie is enlivened. Lavinie is slipshod. All mouldy, immanent people are slipshod. All immanent people are mouldy. All deniable, actionable people are mouldy. If someone is mouldy and slipshod then they are actionable. If someone is immanent and slipshod then they are mouldy. If someone is actionable then they are deniable. Maggy is slipshod.", "logic": "\nCruciform(camilla)\nImmanent(camilla)\nSlipshod(camilla)\nEnlivened(maggy)\nDeniable(verna)\nEnlivened(lavinie)\nSlipshod(lavinie)\nforall x (Mouldy(x) and Immanent(x) -> Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) -> Mouldy(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) and Actionable(x) -> Mouldy(x))\nforall x (Mouldy(x) and Slipshod(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) and Slipshod(x) -> Mouldy(x))\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Deniable(x))\n\nSlipshod(maggy)\n\nforall x (Mouldy(x) and Immanent(x) -> Slipshod(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Zorro is acrogenous. Zorro is diurnal. Zorro is trying. Sergei is lowered. Adolphe is epidermal. Corrie is lowered. Corrie is trying. All governing, diurnal people are trying. All diurnal people are governing. All epidermal, lxxiv people are governing. If someone is governing and trying then they are lxxiv. If someone is diurnal and trying then they are governing. If someone is lxxiv then they are epidermal. Sergei is not diurnal.", "logic": "\nAcrogenous(zorro)\nDiurnal(zorro)\nTrying(zorro)\nLowered(sergei)\nEpidermal(adolphe)\nLowered(corrie)\nTrying(corrie)\nforall x (Governing(x) and Diurnal(x) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Diurnal(x) -> Governing(x))\nforall x (Epidermal(x) and Lxxiv(x) -> Governing(x))\nforall x (Governing(x) and Trying(x) -> Lxxiv(x))\nforall x (Diurnal(x) and Trying(x) -> Governing(x))\nforall x (Lxxiv(x) -> Epidermal(x))\n\nnot Diurnal(sergei)\n\nnot Diurnal(sergei) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Tobye is frictional. Tobye is pressing. Tobye is spatulate. Atlanta is crustose. Flossie is basilary. Jeff is crustose. Jeff is spatulate. All square, pressing people are spatulate. All pressing people are square. All basilary, safe people are square. If someone is square and spatulate then they are safe. If someone is pressing and spatulate then they are square. If someone is safe then they are basilary. Flossie is pressing.", "logic": "\nFrictional(tobye)\nPressing(tobye)\nSpatulate(tobye)\nCrustose(atlanta)\nBasilary(flossie)\nCrustose(jeff)\nSpatulate(jeff)\nforall x (Square(x) and Pressing(x) -> Spatulate(x))\nforall x (Pressing(x) -> Square(x))\nforall x (Basilary(x) and Safe(x) -> Square(x))\nforall x (Square(x) and Spatulate(x) -> Safe(x))\nforall x (Pressing(x) and Spatulate(x) -> Square(x))\nforall x (Safe(x) -> Basilary(x))\n\nPressing(flossie)\n\nPressing(flossie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Gwendolin is knobby. Gwendolin is calcic. Gwendolin is mitigative. Riley is scary. Onlea is brushy. Tucker is scary. Tucker is mitigative. All undersized, calcic people are mitigative. All calcic people are undersized. All brushy, emended people are undersized. If someone is undersized and mitigative then they are emended. If someone is calcic and mitigative then they are undersized. If someone is emended then they are brushy. Onlea is not scary.", "logic": "\nKnobby(gwendolin)\nCalcic(gwendolin)\nMitigative(gwendolin)\nScary(riley)\nBrushy(onlea)\nScary(tucker)\nMitigative(tucker)\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Calcic(x) -> Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Calcic(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Brushy(x) and Emended(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Mitigative(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Calcic(x) and Mitigative(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Emended(x) -> Brushy(x))\n\nnot Scary(onlea)\n\nnot Scary(onlea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Rosalynd is christian. Rosalynd is froward. Rosalynd is depressing. Persis is unipolar. Canada is magenta. Nicolle is unipolar. Nicolle is depressing. All asternal, froward people are depressing. All froward people are asternal. All magenta, ulterior people are asternal. If someone is asternal and depressing then they are ulterior. If someone is froward and depressing then they are asternal. If someone is ulterior then they are magenta. Persis is christian.", "logic": "\nChristian(rosalynd)\nFroward(rosalynd)\nDepressing(rosalynd)\nUnipolar(persis)\nMagenta(canada)\nUnipolar(nicolle)\nDepressing(nicolle)\nforall x (Asternal(x) and Froward(x) -> Depressing(x))\nforall x (Froward(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Magenta(x) and Ulterior(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Asternal(x) and Depressing(x) -> Ulterior(x))\nforall x (Froward(x) and Depressing(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) -> Magenta(x))\n\nChristian(persis)\n\nChristian(persis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Harrold is bantu. Shell is agrestic. Ezra is agrestic. Carrie is propulsive. If someone is monistic and propulsive then they are bantu. If someone is vented and agrestic then they are propulsive. If someone is bantu then they are propulsive. White, decreased people are gratified. White people are decreased. Kind people are vented. Ezra is agrestic.", "logic": "\nBantu(harrold)\nAgrestic(shell)\nAgrestic(ezra)\nPropulsive(carrie)\nforall x (Monistic(x) and Propulsive(x) -> Bantu(x))\nforall x (Vented(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Bantu(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) and Decreased(x) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) -> Decreased(x))\nforall x (Agrestic(x) -> Vented(x))\n\nAgrestic(ezra)\n\ntherefore Agrestic(ezra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Paton is guiding. Maisie is ionized. Luther is ionized. Aindrea is textual. If someone is dynastic and textual then they are guiding. If someone is deformed and ionized then they are textual. If someone is guiding then they are textual. White, loony people are distorted. White people are loony. Kind people are deformed. Luther is not ionized.", "logic": "\nGuiding(paton)\nIonized(maisie)\nIonized(luther)\nTextual(aindrea)\nforall x (Dynastic(x) and Textual(x) -> Guiding(x))\nforall x (Deformed(x) and Ionized(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Guiding(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Textual(x) and Loony(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Textual(x) -> Loony(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Deformed(x))\n\nnot Ionized(luther)\n\ntherefore Ionized(luther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Aylmer is benign. Irving is antlered. Mirabella is antlered. Jae is debonair. If someone is racist and debonair then they are benign. If someone is rush and antlered then they are debonair. If someone is benign then they are debonair. White, accessary people are alary. White people are accessary. Kind people are rush. Aylmer is debonair.", "logic": "\nBenign(aylmer)\nAntlered(irving)\nAntlered(mirabella)\nDebonair(jae)\nforall x (Racist(x) and Debonair(x) -> Benign(x))\nforall x (Rush(x) and Antlered(x) -> Debonair(x))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Debonair(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) and Accessary(x) -> Alary(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) -> Accessary(x))\nforall x (Antlered(x) -> Rush(x))\n\nDebonair(aylmer)\n\nBenign(aylmer) and forall x (Benign(x) -> Debonair(x)) -> therefore Debonair(aylmer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Melisa is telling. Merrill is endowed. Livia is endowed. Daphene is stippled. If someone is apropos and stippled then they are telling. If someone is drupaceous and endowed then they are stippled. If someone is telling then they are stippled. White, medullary people are tellurian. White people are medullary. Kind people are drupaceous. Melisa is not stippled.", "logic": "\nTelling(melisa)\nEndowed(merrill)\nEndowed(livia)\nStippled(daphene)\nforall x (Apropos(x) and Stippled(x) -> Telling(x))\nforall x (Drupaceous(x) and Endowed(x) -> Stippled(x))\nforall x (Telling(x) -> Stippled(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) and Medullary(x) -> Tellurian(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) -> Drupaceous(x))\n\nnot Stippled(melisa)\n\nTelling(melisa) and forall x (Telling(x) -> Stippled(x)) -> therefore Stippled(melisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Trip is sliced. Tremayne is earthen. Rod is earthen. Shay is phobic. If someone is probative and phobic then they are sliced. If someone is bengali and earthen then they are phobic. If someone is sliced then they are phobic. White, choosey people are unreduced. White people are choosey. Kind people are bengali. Rod is phobic.", "logic": "\nSliced(trip)\nEarthen(tremayne)\nEarthen(rod)\nPhobic(shay)\nforall x (Probative(x) and Phobic(x) -> Sliced(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) and Earthen(x) -> Phobic(x))\nforall x (Sliced(x) -> Phobic(x))\nforall x (Phobic(x) and Choosey(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Phobic(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Earthen(x) -> Bengali(x))\n\nPhobic(rod)\n\nEarthen(rod) and forall x (Earthen(x) -> Bengali(x)) -> therefore Bengali(rod) Bengali(rod) and Earthen(rod) and forall x (Bengali(x) and Earthen(x) -> Phobic(x)) -> therefore Phobic(rod)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Aron is attachable. Juana is russian. Austen is russian. Karrie is aguish. If someone is strategic and aguish then they are attachable. If someone is precursory and russian then they are aguish. If someone is attachable then they are aguish. White, tenderized people are technical. White people are tenderized. Kind people are precursory. Juana is not aguish.", "logic": "\nAttachable(aron)\nRussian(juana)\nRussian(austen)\nAguish(karrie)\nforall x (Strategic(x) and Aguish(x) -> Attachable(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) and Russian(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Aguish(x) and Tenderized(x) -> Technical(x))\nforall x (Aguish(x) -> Tenderized(x))\nforall x (Russian(x) -> Precursory(x))\n\nnot Aguish(juana)\n\nRussian(juana) and forall x (Russian(x) -> Precursory(x)) -> therefore Precursory(juana) Precursory(juana) and Russian(juana) and forall x (Precursory(x) and Russian(x) -> Aguish(x)) -> therefore Aguish(juana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Luella is plump. Cristi is columnar. Bamby is columnar. Olivier is pacific. If someone is raging and pacific then they are plump. If someone is childly and columnar then they are pacific. If someone is plump then they are pacific. White, unmerciful people are vacuolate. White people are unmerciful. Kind people are childly. Bamby is unmerciful.", "logic": "\nPlump(luella)\nColumnar(cristi)\nColumnar(bamby)\nPacific(olivier)\nforall x (Raging(x) and Pacific(x) -> Plump(x))\nforall x (Childly(x) and Columnar(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Plump(x) -> Pacific(x))\nforall x (Pacific(x) and Unmerciful(x) -> Vacuolate(x))\nforall x (Pacific(x) -> Unmerciful(x))\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Childly(x))\n\nUnmerciful(bamby)\n\nColumnar(bamby) and forall x (Columnar(x) -> Childly(x)) -> therefore Childly(bamby) Childly(bamby) and Columnar(bamby) and forall x (Childly(x) and Columnar(x) -> Pacific(x)) -> therefore Pacific(bamby) Pacific(bamby) and forall x (Pacific(x) -> Unmerciful(x)) -> therefore Unmerciful(bamby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Erl is analeptic. Tiffy is boned. Freddie is boned. Benn is vatic. If someone is torturous and vatic then they are analeptic. If someone is elated and boned then they are vatic. If someone is analeptic then they are vatic. White, bothersome people are most. White people are bothersome. Kind people are elated. Freddie is not bothersome.", "logic": "\nAnaleptic(erl)\nBoned(tiffy)\nBoned(freddie)\nVatic(benn)\nforall x (Torturous(x) and Vatic(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Elated(x) and Boned(x) -> Vatic(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Vatic(x))\nforall x (Vatic(x) and Bothersome(x) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Vatic(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nforall x (Boned(x) -> Elated(x))\n\nnot Bothersome(freddie)\n\nBoned(freddie) and forall x (Boned(x) -> Elated(x)) -> therefore Elated(freddie) Elated(freddie) and Boned(freddie) and forall x (Elated(x) and Boned(x) -> Vatic(x)) -> therefore Vatic(freddie) Vatic(freddie) and forall x (Vatic(x) -> Bothersome(x)) -> therefore Bothersome(freddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Rebbecca is agonising. Vicki is trophic. Lois is trophic. Jack is damn. If someone is acned and damn then they are agonising. If someone is relaxed and trophic then they are damn. If someone is agonising then they are damn. White, pelvic people are buttonlike. White people are pelvic. Kind people are relaxed. Jack is not relaxed.", "logic": "\nAgonising(rebbecca)\nTrophic(vicki)\nTrophic(lois)\nDamn(jack)\nforall x (Acned(x) and Damn(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Relaxed(x) and Trophic(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Damn(x) and Pelvic(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nforall x (Damn(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Trophic(x) -> Relaxed(x))\n\nnot Relaxed(jack)\n\nforall x (Trophic(x) -> Relaxed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Joya is retinal. Micky is revengeful. Cleopatra is revengeful. Jud is fireproof. If someone is anaphasic and fireproof then they are retinal. If someone is dianoetic and revengeful then they are fireproof. If someone is retinal then they are fireproof. White, greyed people are cruciate. White people are greyed. Kind people are dianoetic. Joya is dianoetic.", "logic": "\nRetinal(joya)\nRevengeful(micky)\nRevengeful(cleopatra)\nFireproof(jud)\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Fireproof(x) -> Retinal(x))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Revengeful(x) -> Fireproof(x))\nforall x (Retinal(x) -> Fireproof(x))\nforall x (Fireproof(x) and Greyed(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Fireproof(x) -> Greyed(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\n\nDianoetic(joya)\n\nforall x (Revengeful(x) -> Dianoetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Andrew is revealing. Braden is alien. Betta is alien. Kiley is asterismal. If someone is slippy and asterismal then they are revealing. If someone is prakritic and alien then they are asterismal. If someone is revealing then they are asterismal. White, unspoilt people are getatable. White people are unspoilt. Kind people are prakritic. Braden is not revealing.", "logic": "\nRevealing(andrew)\nAlien(braden)\nAlien(betta)\nAsterismal(kiley)\nforall x (Slippy(x) and Asterismal(x) -> Revealing(x))\nforall x (Prakritic(x) and Alien(x) -> Asterismal(x))\nforall x (Revealing(x) -> Asterismal(x))\nforall x (Asterismal(x) and Unspoilt(x) -> Getatable(x))\nforall x (Asterismal(x) -> Unspoilt(x))\nforall x (Alien(x) -> Prakritic(x))\n\nnot Revealing(braden)\n\nforall x (Slippy(x) and Asterismal(x) -> Revealing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Nariko is regimental. Ikey is rangy. Hal is rangy. Chicky is sparing. If someone is overloaded and sparing then they are regimental. If someone is bedded and rangy then they are sparing. If someone is regimental then they are sparing. White, diagonal people are inharmonic. White people are diagonal. Kind people are bedded. Hal is regimental.", "logic": "\nRegimental(nariko)\nRangy(ikey)\nRangy(hal)\nSparing(chicky)\nforall x (Overloaded(x) and Sparing(x) -> Regimental(x))\nforall x (Bedded(x) and Rangy(x) -> Sparing(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) -> Sparing(x))\nforall x (Sparing(x) and Diagonal(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\nforall x (Sparing(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> Bedded(x))\n\nRegimental(hal)\n\nforall x (Overloaded(x) and Sparing(x) -> Regimental(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Silvain is penal. Gaston is soled. Storm is soled. Tasha is analyzed. If someone is abloom and analyzed then they are penal. If someone is unmelted and soled then they are analyzed. If someone is penal then they are analyzed. White, spirituous people are eightfold. White people are spirituous. Kind people are unmelted. Storm is not abloom.", "logic": "\nPenal(silvain)\nSoled(gaston)\nSoled(storm)\nAnalyzed(tasha)\nforall x (Abloom(x) and Analyzed(x) -> Penal(x))\nforall x (Unmelted(x) and Soled(x) -> Analyzed(x))\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Analyzed(x))\nforall x (Analyzed(x) and Spirituous(x) -> Eightfold(x))\nforall x (Analyzed(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Soled(x) -> Unmelted(x))\n\nnot Abloom(storm)\n\nnot Abloom(storm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Clement is cabalistic. Josh is killing. Gilburt is killing. Georgy is unalloyed. If someone is unmoving and unalloyed then they are cabalistic. If someone is truculent and killing then they are unalloyed. If someone is cabalistic then they are unalloyed. White, valuable people are demagogic. White people are valuable. Kind people are truculent. Clement is killing.", "logic": "\nCabalistic(clement)\nKilling(josh)\nKilling(gilburt)\nUnalloyed(georgy)\nforall x (Unmoving(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) and Killing(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) and Valuable(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) -> Valuable(x))\nforall x (Killing(x) -> Truculent(x))\n\nKilling(clement)\n\nKilling(clement) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Charmion is scrubby. Walther is telepathic. Geneva is telepathic. Aviva is enraged. If someone is disgusting and enraged then they are scrubby. If someone is creedal and telepathic then they are enraged. If someone is scrubby then they are enraged. White, vernacular people are federal. White people are vernacular. Kind people are creedal. Aviva is not telepathic.", "logic": "\nScrubby(charmion)\nTelepathic(walther)\nTelepathic(geneva)\nEnraged(aviva)\nforall x (Disgusting(x) and Enraged(x) -> Scrubby(x))\nforall x (Creedal(x) and Telepathic(x) -> Enraged(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Enraged(x))\nforall x (Enraged(x) and Vernacular(x) -> Federal(x))\nforall x (Enraged(x) -> Vernacular(x))\nforall x (Telepathic(x) -> Creedal(x))\n\nnot Telepathic(aviva)\n\nnot Telepathic(aviva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Kirstyn is robotic. Preston is transposed. Marve is transposed. Prasad is impaired. If someone is fanatic and impaired then they are robotic. If someone is talkative and transposed then they are impaired. If someone is robotic then they are impaired. White, continued people are purifying. White people are continued. Kind people are talkative. Preston is fanatic.", "logic": "\nRobotic(kirstyn)\nTransposed(preston)\nTransposed(marve)\nImpaired(prasad)\nforall x (Fanatic(x) and Impaired(x) -> Robotic(x))\nforall x (Talkative(x) and Transposed(x) -> Impaired(x))\nforall x (Robotic(x) -> Impaired(x))\nforall x (Impaired(x) and Continued(x) -> Purifying(x))\nforall x (Impaired(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Transposed(x) -> Talkative(x))\n\nFanatic(preston)\n\nFanatic(preston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "The emma lambaste the patrice. The emma is antsy. The emma is goofy. The emma halt the patrice. The patrice lambaste the emma. The patrice is cushy. The patrice is pyramidal. The patrice is goofy. The patrice dwarf the emma. The patrice halt the emma. If someone lambaste the patrice and they are pyramidal then they are impelled. All pyramidal people are goofy. If someone dwarf the patrice then the patrice dwarf the emma. If the emma halt the patrice and the patrice lambaste the emma then the emma lambaste the patrice. If someone is pyramidal and they need the patrice then the patrice is antsy. If someone is antsy then they see the patrice. If someone is goofy then they eat the patrice. If someone is impelled then they are antsy. The emma halt the patrice.", "logic": "\nLambaste(emma, patrice)\nAntsy(emma)\nGoofy(emma)\nHalt(emma, patrice)\nLambaste(patrice, emma)\nCushy(patrice)\nPyramidal(patrice)\nGoofy(patrice)\nDwarf(patrice, emma)\nHalt(patrice, emma)\nforall x (Lambaste(x, patrice) and Pyramidal(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) -> Goofy(x))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, patrice) -> Dwarf(patrice, emma))\nHalt(emma, patrice) and Lambaste(patrice, emma) -> Lambaste(emma, patrice)\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) and Dwarf(x, patrice) -> Antsy(patrice))\nforall x (Antsy(x) -> Halt(x, patrice))\nforall x (Goofy(x) -> Lambaste(x, patrice))\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> Antsy(x))\n\nHalt(emma, patrice)\n\ntherefore Halt(emma, patrice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The welch prefer the truman. The welch is obstetric. The welch is steroidal. The welch skim the truman. The truman prefer the welch. The truman is routine. The truman is vernacular. The truman is steroidal. The truman deregulate the welch. The truman skim the welch. If someone prefer the truman and they are vernacular then they are derivative. All vernacular people are steroidal. If someone deregulate the truman then the truman deregulate the welch. If the welch skim the truman and the truman prefer the welch then the welch prefer the truman. If someone is vernacular and they need the truman then the truman is obstetric. If someone is obstetric then they see the truman. If someone is steroidal then they eat the truman. If someone is derivative then they are obstetric. The welch does not see the truman.", "logic": "\nPrefer(welch, truman)\nObstetric(welch)\nSteroidal(welch)\nSkim(welch, truman)\nPrefer(truman, welch)\nRoutine(truman)\nVernacular(truman)\nSteroidal(truman)\nDeregulate(truman, welch)\nSkim(truman, welch)\nforall x (Prefer(x, truman) and Vernacular(x) -> Derivative(x))\nforall x (Vernacular(x) -> Steroidal(x))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, truman) -> Deregulate(truman, welch))\nSkim(welch, truman) and Prefer(truman, welch) -> Prefer(welch, truman)\nforall x (Vernacular(x) and Deregulate(x, truman) -> Obstetric(truman))\nforall x (Obstetric(x) -> Skim(x, truman))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) -> Prefer(x, truman))\nforall x (Derivative(x) -> Obstetric(x))\n\nnot Skim(welch, truman)\n\ntherefore Skim(welch, truman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The averyl renew the abigail. The averyl is erosive. The averyl is filial. The averyl cannon the abigail. The abigail renew the averyl. The abigail is capacious. The abigail is grave. The abigail is filial. The abigail bumble the averyl. The abigail cannon the averyl. If someone renew the abigail and they are grave then they are runny. All grave people are filial. If someone bumble the abigail then the abigail bumble the averyl. If the averyl cannon the abigail and the abigail renew the averyl then the averyl renew the abigail. If someone is grave and they need the abigail then the abigail is erosive. If someone is erosive then they see the abigail. If someone is filial then they eat the abigail. If someone is runny then they are erosive. The abigail renew the abigail.", "logic": "\nRenew(averyl, abigail)\nErosive(averyl)\nFilial(averyl)\nCannon(averyl, abigail)\nRenew(abigail, averyl)\nCapacious(abigail)\nGrave(abigail)\nFilial(abigail)\nBumble(abigail, averyl)\nCannon(abigail, averyl)\nforall x (Renew(x, abigail) and Grave(x) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Filial(x))\nforall x (Bumble(x, abigail) -> Bumble(abigail, averyl))\nCannon(averyl, abigail) and Renew(abigail, averyl) -> Renew(averyl, abigail)\nforall x (Grave(x) and Bumble(x, abigail) -> Erosive(abigail))\nforall x (Erosive(x) -> Cannon(x, abigail))\nforall x (Filial(x) -> Renew(x, abigail))\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Erosive(x))\n\nRenew(abigail, abigail)\n\nFilial(abigail) and forall x (Filial(x) -> Renew(x, abigail)) -> therefore Renew(abigail, abigail)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The quint boss the alena. The quint is unrealized. The quint is barefooted. The quint repercuss the alena. The alena boss the quint. The alena is incomplete. The alena is microsomal. The alena is barefooted. The alena lipread the quint. The alena repercuss the quint. If someone boss the alena and they are microsomal then they are coupled. All microsomal people are barefooted. If someone lipread the alena then the alena lipread the quint. If the quint repercuss the alena and the alena boss the quint then the quint boss the alena. If someone is microsomal and they need the alena then the alena is unrealized. If someone is unrealized then they see the alena. If someone is barefooted then they eat the alena. If someone is coupled then they are unrealized. The alena does not eat the alena.", "logic": "\nBoss(quint, alena)\nUnrealized(quint)\nBarefooted(quint)\nRepercuss(quint, alena)\nBoss(alena, quint)\nIncomplete(alena)\nMicrosomal(alena)\nBarefooted(alena)\nLipread(alena, quint)\nRepercuss(alena, quint)\nforall x (Boss(x, alena) and Microsomal(x) -> Coupled(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Barefooted(x))\nforall x (Lipread(x, alena) -> Lipread(alena, quint))\nRepercuss(quint, alena) and Boss(alena, quint) -> Boss(quint, alena)\nforall x (Microsomal(x) and Lipread(x, alena) -> Unrealized(alena))\nforall x (Unrealized(x) -> Repercuss(x, alena))\nforall x (Barefooted(x) -> Boss(x, alena))\nforall x (Coupled(x) -> Unrealized(x))\n\nnot Boss(alena, alena)\n\nBarefooted(alena) and forall x (Barefooted(x) -> Boss(x, alena)) -> therefore Boss(alena, alena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The stefano bother the genny. The stefano is jocular. The stefano is musky. The stefano militarize the genny. The genny bother the stefano. The genny is coroneted. The genny is figurative. The genny is musky. The genny militate the stefano. The genny militarize the stefano. If someone bother the genny and they are figurative then they are arciform. All figurative people are musky. If someone militate the genny then the genny militate the stefano. If the stefano militarize the genny and the genny bother the stefano then the stefano bother the genny. If someone is figurative and they need the genny then the genny is jocular. If someone is jocular then they see the genny. If someone is musky then they eat the genny. If someone is arciform then they are jocular. The genny is arciform.", "logic": "\nBother(stefano, genny)\nJocular(stefano)\nMusky(stefano)\nMilitarize(stefano, genny)\nBother(genny, stefano)\nCoroneted(genny)\nFigurative(genny)\nMusky(genny)\nMilitate(genny, stefano)\nMilitarize(genny, stefano)\nforall x (Bother(x, genny) and Figurative(x) -> Arciform(x))\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Musky(x))\nforall x (Militate(x, genny) -> Militate(genny, stefano))\nMilitarize(stefano, genny) and Bother(genny, stefano) -> Bother(stefano, genny)\nforall x (Figurative(x) and Militate(x, genny) -> Jocular(genny))\nforall x (Jocular(x) -> Militarize(x, genny))\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Bother(x, genny))\nforall x (Arciform(x) -> Jocular(x))\n\nArciform(genny)\n\nMusky(genny) and forall x (Musky(x) -> Bother(x, genny)) -> therefore Bother(genny, genny) Bother(genny, genny) and Figurative(genny) and forall x (Bother(x, genny) and Figurative(x) -> Arciform(x)) -> therefore Arciform(genny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The beitris bespeak the nancee. The beitris is anabiotic. The beitris is asyndetic. The beitris side the nancee. The nancee bespeak the beitris. The nancee is gratis. The nancee is made. The nancee is asyndetic. The nancee cast the beitris. The nancee side the beitris. If someone bespeak the nancee and they are made then they are skyward. All made people are asyndetic. If someone cast the nancee then the nancee cast the beitris. If the beitris side the nancee and the nancee bespeak the beitris then the beitris bespeak the nancee. If someone is made and they need the nancee then the nancee is anabiotic. If someone is anabiotic then they see the nancee. If someone is asyndetic then they eat the nancee. If someone is skyward then they are anabiotic. The nancee is not skyward.", "logic": "\nBespeak(beitris, nancee)\nAnabiotic(beitris)\nAsyndetic(beitris)\nSide(beitris, nancee)\nBespeak(nancee, beitris)\nGratis(nancee)\nMade(nancee)\nAsyndetic(nancee)\nCast(nancee, beitris)\nSide(nancee, beitris)\nforall x (Bespeak(x, nancee) and Made(x) -> Skyward(x))\nforall x (Made(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Cast(x, nancee) -> Cast(nancee, beitris))\nSide(beitris, nancee) and Bespeak(nancee, beitris) -> Bespeak(beitris, nancee)\nforall x (Made(x) and Cast(x, nancee) -> Anabiotic(nancee))\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) -> Side(x, nancee))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Bespeak(x, nancee))\nforall x (Skyward(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\n\nnot Skyward(nancee)\n\nAsyndetic(nancee) and forall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Bespeak(x, nancee)) -> therefore Bespeak(nancee, nancee) Bespeak(nancee, nancee) and Made(nancee) and forall x (Bespeak(x, nancee) and Made(x) -> Skyward(x)) -> therefore Skyward(nancee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The bud azure the guthrey. The bud is viceregal. The bud is swiss. The bud coast the guthrey. The guthrey azure the bud. The guthrey is vacuolate. The guthrey is livery. The guthrey is swiss. The guthrey handwash the bud. The guthrey coast the bud. If someone azure the guthrey and they are livery then they are dental. All livery people are swiss. If someone handwash the guthrey then the guthrey handwash the bud. If the bud coast the guthrey and the guthrey azure the bud then the bud azure the guthrey. If someone is livery and they need the guthrey then the guthrey is viceregal. If someone is viceregal then they see the guthrey. If someone is swiss then they eat the guthrey. If someone is dental then they are viceregal. The guthrey is viceregal.", "logic": "\nAzure(bud, guthrey)\nViceregal(bud)\nSwiss(bud)\nCoast(bud, guthrey)\nAzure(guthrey, bud)\nVacuolate(guthrey)\nLivery(guthrey)\nSwiss(guthrey)\nHandwash(guthrey, bud)\nCoast(guthrey, bud)\nforall x (Azure(x, guthrey) and Livery(x) -> Dental(x))\nforall x (Livery(x) -> Swiss(x))\nforall x (Handwash(x, guthrey) -> Handwash(guthrey, bud))\nCoast(bud, guthrey) and Azure(guthrey, bud) -> Azure(bud, guthrey)\nforall x (Livery(x) and Handwash(x, guthrey) -> Viceregal(guthrey))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) -> Coast(x, guthrey))\nforall x (Swiss(x) -> Azure(x, guthrey))\nforall x (Dental(x) -> Viceregal(x))\n\nViceregal(guthrey)\n\nSwiss(guthrey) and forall x (Swiss(x) -> Azure(x, guthrey)) -> therefore Azure(guthrey, guthrey) Azure(guthrey, guthrey) and Livery(guthrey) and forall x (Azure(x, guthrey) and Livery(x) -> Dental(x)) -> therefore Dental(guthrey) Dental(guthrey) and forall x (Dental(x) -> Viceregal(x)) -> therefore Viceregal(guthrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The alvinia lexicalize the sophia. The alvinia is scant. The alvinia is unfocussed. The alvinia archive the sophia. The sophia lexicalize the alvinia. The sophia is unassigned. The sophia is cubic. The sophia is unfocussed. The sophia douche the alvinia. The sophia archive the alvinia. If someone lexicalize the sophia and they are cubic then they are unsightly. All cubic people are unfocussed. If someone douche the sophia then the sophia douche the alvinia. If the alvinia archive the sophia and the sophia lexicalize the alvinia then the alvinia lexicalize the sophia. If someone is cubic and they need the sophia then the sophia is scant. If someone is scant then they see the sophia. If someone is unfocussed then they eat the sophia. If someone is unsightly then they are scant. The sophia is not scant.", "logic": "\nLexicalize(alvinia, sophia)\nScant(alvinia)\nUnfocussed(alvinia)\nArchive(alvinia, sophia)\nLexicalize(sophia, alvinia)\nUnassigned(sophia)\nCubic(sophia)\nUnfocussed(sophia)\nDouche(sophia, alvinia)\nArchive(sophia, alvinia)\nforall x (Lexicalize(x, sophia) and Cubic(x) -> Unsightly(x))\nforall x (Cubic(x) -> Unfocussed(x))\nforall x (Douche(x, sophia) -> Douche(sophia, alvinia))\nArchive(alvinia, sophia) and Lexicalize(sophia, alvinia) -> Lexicalize(alvinia, sophia)\nforall x (Cubic(x) and Douche(x, sophia) -> Scant(sophia))\nforall x (Scant(x) -> Archive(x, sophia))\nforall x (Unfocussed(x) -> Lexicalize(x, sophia))\nforall x (Unsightly(x) -> Scant(x))\n\nnot Scant(sophia)\n\nUnfocussed(sophia) and forall x (Unfocussed(x) -> Lexicalize(x, sophia)) -> therefore Lexicalize(sophia, sophia) Lexicalize(sophia, sophia) and Cubic(sophia) and forall x (Lexicalize(x, sophia) and Cubic(x) -> Unsightly(x)) -> therefore Unsightly(sophia) Unsightly(sophia) and forall x (Unsightly(x) -> Scant(x)) -> therefore Scant(sophia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The sheelah preamble the krista. The sheelah is unbacked. The sheelah is anserine. The sheelah launder the krista. The krista preamble the sheelah. The krista is rhombic. The krista is aphasic. The krista is anserine. The krista frequent the sheelah. The krista launder the sheelah. If someone preamble the krista and they are aphasic then they are cxxxv. All aphasic people are anserine. If someone frequent the krista then the krista frequent the sheelah. If the sheelah launder the krista and the krista preamble the sheelah then the sheelah preamble the krista. If someone is aphasic and they need the krista then the krista is unbacked. If someone is unbacked then they see the krista. If someone is anserine then they eat the krista. If someone is cxxxv then they are unbacked. The sheelah is not cxxxv.", "logic": "\nPreamble(sheelah, krista)\nUnbacked(sheelah)\nAnserine(sheelah)\nLaunder(sheelah, krista)\nPreamble(krista, sheelah)\nRhombic(krista)\nAphasic(krista)\nAnserine(krista)\nFrequent(krista, sheelah)\nLaunder(krista, sheelah)\nforall x (Preamble(x, krista) and Aphasic(x) -> Cxxxv(x))\nforall x (Aphasic(x) -> Anserine(x))\nforall x (Frequent(x, krista) -> Frequent(krista, sheelah))\nLaunder(sheelah, krista) and Preamble(krista, sheelah) -> Preamble(sheelah, krista)\nforall x (Aphasic(x) and Frequent(x, krista) -> Unbacked(krista))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) -> Launder(x, krista))\nforall x (Anserine(x) -> Preamble(x, krista))\nforall x (Cxxxv(x) -> Unbacked(x))\n\nnot Cxxxv(sheelah)\n\nforall x (Preamble(x, krista) and Aphasic(x) -> Cxxxv(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The minerva boondoggle the brad. The minerva is starving. The minerva is racking. The minerva colourise the brad. The brad boondoggle the minerva. The brad is awless. The brad is copacetic. The brad is racking. The brad scorn the minerva. The brad colourise the minerva. If someone boondoggle the brad and they are copacetic then they are cecal. All copacetic people are racking. If someone scorn the brad then the brad scorn the minerva. If the minerva colourise the brad and the brad boondoggle the minerva then the minerva boondoggle the brad. If someone is copacetic and they need the brad then the brad is starving. If someone is starving then they see the brad. If someone is racking then they eat the brad. If someone is cecal then they are starving. The minerva is awless.", "logic": "\nBoondoggle(minerva, brad)\nStarving(minerva)\nRacking(minerva)\nColourise(minerva, brad)\nBoondoggle(brad, minerva)\nAwless(brad)\nCopacetic(brad)\nRacking(brad)\nScorn(brad, minerva)\nColourise(brad, minerva)\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, brad) and Copacetic(x) -> Cecal(x))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Racking(x))\nforall x (Scorn(x, brad) -> Scorn(brad, minerva))\nColourise(minerva, brad) and Boondoggle(brad, minerva) -> Boondoggle(minerva, brad)\nforall x (Copacetic(x) and Scorn(x, brad) -> Starving(brad))\nforall x (Starving(x) -> Colourise(x, brad))\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Boondoggle(x, brad))\nforall x (Cecal(x) -> Starving(x))\n\nAwless(minerva)\n\nAwless(minerva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The barthel lade the lucas. The barthel is tuneless. The barthel is beamish. The barthel interleave the lucas. The lucas lade the barthel. The lucas is bivariate. The lucas is forficate. The lucas is beamish. The lucas cocoon the barthel. The lucas interleave the barthel. If someone lade the lucas and they are forficate then they are unsuasible. All forficate people are beamish. If someone cocoon the lucas then the lucas cocoon the barthel. If the barthel interleave the lucas and the lucas lade the barthel then the barthel lade the lucas. If someone is forficate and they need the lucas then the lucas is tuneless. If someone is tuneless then they see the lucas. If someone is beamish then they eat the lucas. If someone is unsuasible then they are tuneless. The barthel does not eat the barthel.", "logic": "\nLade(barthel, lucas)\nTuneless(barthel)\nBeamish(barthel)\nInterleave(barthel, lucas)\nLade(lucas, barthel)\nBivariate(lucas)\nForficate(lucas)\nBeamish(lucas)\nCocoon(lucas, barthel)\nInterleave(lucas, barthel)\nforall x (Lade(x, lucas) and Forficate(x) -> Unsuasible(x))\nforall x (Forficate(x) -> Beamish(x))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, lucas) -> Cocoon(lucas, barthel))\nInterleave(barthel, lucas) and Lade(lucas, barthel) -> Lade(barthel, lucas)\nforall x (Forficate(x) and Cocoon(x, lucas) -> Tuneless(lucas))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Interleave(x, lucas))\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> Lade(x, lucas))\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Tuneless(x))\n\nnot Lade(barthel, barthel)\n\nnot Lade(barthel, barthel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The jobie meet the cybal. The jobie is wroth. The jobie is plucked. The jobie poke the cybal. The cybal meet the jobie. The cybal is pondering. The cybal is blighted. The cybal is plucked. The cybal drub the jobie. The cybal poke the jobie. If someone meet the cybal and they are blighted then they are heard. All blighted people are plucked. If someone drub the cybal then the cybal drub the jobie. If the jobie poke the cybal and the cybal meet the jobie then the jobie meet the cybal. If someone is blighted and they need the cybal then the cybal is wroth. If someone is wroth then they see the cybal. If someone is plucked then they eat the cybal. If someone is heard then they are wroth. The jobie drub the cybal.", "logic": "\nMeet(jobie, cybal)\nWroth(jobie)\nPlucked(jobie)\nPoke(jobie, cybal)\nMeet(cybal, jobie)\nPondering(cybal)\nBlighted(cybal)\nPlucked(cybal)\nDrub(cybal, jobie)\nPoke(cybal, jobie)\nforall x (Meet(x, cybal) and Blighted(x) -> Heard(x))\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Plucked(x))\nforall x (Drub(x, cybal) -> Drub(cybal, jobie))\nPoke(jobie, cybal) and Meet(cybal, jobie) -> Meet(jobie, cybal)\nforall x (Blighted(x) and Drub(x, cybal) -> Wroth(cybal))\nforall x (Wroth(x) -> Poke(x, cybal))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Meet(x, cybal))\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Wroth(x))\n\nDrub(jobie, cybal)\n\nDrub(jobie, cybal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The ivan name the daniele. The ivan is developed. The ivan is rushlike. The ivan motorbike the daniele. The daniele name the ivan. The daniele is comforted. The daniele is whispered. The daniele is rushlike. The daniele pleach the ivan. The daniele motorbike the ivan. If someone name the daniele and they are whispered then they are mythologic. All whispered people are rushlike. If someone pleach the daniele then the daniele pleach the ivan. If the ivan motorbike the daniele and the daniele name the ivan then the ivan name the daniele. If someone is whispered and they need the daniele then the daniele is developed. If someone is developed then they see the daniele. If someone is rushlike then they eat the daniele. If someone is mythologic then they are developed. The daniele does not need the daniele.", "logic": "\nName(ivan, daniele)\nDeveloped(ivan)\nRushlike(ivan)\nMotorbike(ivan, daniele)\nName(daniele, ivan)\nComforted(daniele)\nWhispered(daniele)\nRushlike(daniele)\nPleach(daniele, ivan)\nMotorbike(daniele, ivan)\nforall x (Name(x, daniele) and Whispered(x) -> Mythologic(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Pleach(x, daniele) -> Pleach(daniele, ivan))\nMotorbike(ivan, daniele) and Name(daniele, ivan) -> Name(ivan, daniele)\nforall x (Whispered(x) and Pleach(x, daniele) -> Developed(daniele))\nforall x (Developed(x) -> Motorbike(x, daniele))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) -> Name(x, daniele))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) -> Developed(x))\n\nnot Pleach(daniele, daniele)\n\nnot Pleach(daniele, daniele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The nicoline whisk the martainn. The nicoline is hominine. The nicoline is mutant. The nicoline wish the martainn. The martainn whisk the nicoline. The martainn is scarce. The martainn is damnatory. The martainn is mutant. The martainn miaow the nicoline. The martainn wish the nicoline. If someone whisk the martainn and they are damnatory then they are dominated. All damnatory people are mutant. If someone miaow the martainn then the martainn miaow the nicoline. If the nicoline wish the martainn and the martainn whisk the nicoline then the nicoline whisk the martainn. If someone is damnatory and they need the martainn then the martainn is hominine. If someone is hominine then they see the martainn. If someone is mutant then they eat the martainn. If someone is dominated then they are hominine. The nicoline is damnatory.", "logic": "\nWhisk(nicoline, martainn)\nHominine(nicoline)\nMutant(nicoline)\nWish(nicoline, martainn)\nWhisk(martainn, nicoline)\nScarce(martainn)\nDamnatory(martainn)\nMutant(martainn)\nMiaow(martainn, nicoline)\nWish(martainn, nicoline)\nforall x (Whisk(x, martainn) and Damnatory(x) -> Dominated(x))\nforall x (Damnatory(x) -> Mutant(x))\nforall x (Miaow(x, martainn) -> Miaow(martainn, nicoline))\nWish(nicoline, martainn) and Whisk(martainn, nicoline) -> Whisk(nicoline, martainn)\nforall x (Damnatory(x) and Miaow(x, martainn) -> Hominine(martainn))\nforall x (Hominine(x) -> Wish(x, martainn))\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> Whisk(x, martainn))\nforall x (Dominated(x) -> Hominine(x))\n\nDamnatory(nicoline)\n\nDamnatory(nicoline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The adolf protrude the acacia. The adolf is unsmiling. The adolf is impersonal. The adolf veto the acacia. The acacia protrude the adolf. The acacia is caramel. The acacia is antitypic. The acacia is impersonal. The acacia wire the adolf. The acacia veto the adolf. If someone protrude the acacia and they are antitypic then they are photogenic. All antitypic people are impersonal. If someone wire the acacia then the acacia wire the adolf. If the adolf veto the acacia and the acacia protrude the adolf then the adolf protrude the acacia. If someone is antitypic and they need the acacia then the acacia is unsmiling. If someone is unsmiling then they see the acacia. If someone is impersonal then they eat the acacia. If someone is photogenic then they are unsmiling. The adolf does not see the adolf.", "logic": "\nProtrude(adolf, acacia)\nUnsmiling(adolf)\nImpersonal(adolf)\nVeto(adolf, acacia)\nProtrude(acacia, adolf)\nCaramel(acacia)\nAntitypic(acacia)\nImpersonal(acacia)\nWire(acacia, adolf)\nVeto(acacia, adolf)\nforall x (Protrude(x, acacia) and Antitypic(x) -> Photogenic(x))\nforall x (Antitypic(x) -> Impersonal(x))\nforall x (Wire(x, acacia) -> Wire(acacia, adolf))\nVeto(adolf, acacia) and Protrude(acacia, adolf) -> Protrude(adolf, acacia)\nforall x (Antitypic(x) and Wire(x, acacia) -> Unsmiling(acacia))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Veto(x, acacia))\nforall x (Impersonal(x) -> Protrude(x, acacia))\nforall x (Photogenic(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\n\nnot Veto(adolf, adolf)\n\nnot Veto(adolf, adolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The dafna fluoridise the win. The dafna is axonal. The dafna is mercenary. The dafna digest the win. The win fluoridise the dafna. The win is intensive. The win is epiphyseal. The win is mercenary. The win pinion the dafna. The win digest the dafna. If someone fluoridise the win and they are epiphyseal then they are coiling. All epiphyseal people are mercenary. If someone pinion the win then the win pinion the dafna. If the dafna digest the win and the win fluoridise the dafna then the dafna fluoridise the win. If someone is epiphyseal and they need the win then the win is axonal. If someone is axonal then they see the win. If someone is mercenary then they eat the win. If someone is coiling then they are axonal. The dafna pinion the dafna.", "logic": "\nFluoridise(dafna, win)\nAxonal(dafna)\nMercenary(dafna)\nDigest(dafna, win)\nFluoridise(win, dafna)\nIntensive(win)\nEpiphyseal(win)\nMercenary(win)\nPinion(win, dafna)\nDigest(win, dafna)\nforall x (Fluoridise(x, win) and Epiphyseal(x) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Mercenary(x))\nforall x (Pinion(x, win) -> Pinion(win, dafna))\nDigest(dafna, win) and Fluoridise(win, dafna) -> Fluoridise(dafna, win)\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) and Pinion(x, win) -> Axonal(win))\nforall x (Axonal(x) -> Digest(x, win))\nforall x (Mercenary(x) -> Fluoridise(x, win))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Axonal(x))\n\nPinion(dafna, dafna)\n\nPinion(dafna, dafna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "Grethel is amnesic. Grethel is synoptical. Grethel is secretive. Ardis is verified. Ardis is amnesic. Ardis is crazy. Ardis is stuffed. Ardis is synoptical. Ardis is secretive. Ardis is sniffly. Annalise is verified. Annalise is stuffed. Annalise is secretive. Merv is stuffed. Merv is secretive. All stuffed, verified people are sniffly. If someone is secretive and synoptical then they are sniffly. If Merv is stuffed then Merv is synoptical. White people are crazy. Kind people are secretive. If someone is crazy then they are sniffly. All verified, sniffly people are synoptical. All crazy people are stuffed. Ardis is verified.", "logic": "\nAmnesic(grethel)\nSynoptical(grethel)\nSecretive(grethel)\nVerified(ardis)\nAmnesic(ardis)\nCrazy(ardis)\nStuffed(ardis)\nSynoptical(ardis)\nSecretive(ardis)\nSniffly(ardis)\nVerified(annalise)\nStuffed(annalise)\nSecretive(annalise)\nStuffed(merv)\nSecretive(merv)\nforall x (Stuffed(x) and Verified(x) -> Sniffly(x))\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Synoptical(x) -> Sniffly(x))\nStuffed(merv) -> Synoptical(merv)\nforall x (Sniffly(x) -> Crazy(x))\nforall x (Crazy(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Crazy(x) -> Sniffly(x))\nforall x (Verified(x) and Sniffly(x) -> Synoptical(x))\nforall x (Crazy(x) -> Stuffed(x))\n\nVerified(ardis)\n\ntherefore Verified(ardis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Dolli is topped. Dolli is decent. Dolli is brachiate. Meryl is joking. Meryl is topped. Meryl is gracious. Meryl is bodied. Meryl is decent. Meryl is brachiate. Meryl is uneducated. Randolf is joking. Randolf is bodied. Randolf is brachiate. Milo is bodied. Milo is brachiate. All bodied, joking people are uneducated. If someone is brachiate and decent then they are uneducated. If Milo is bodied then Milo is decent. White people are gracious. Kind people are brachiate. If someone is gracious then they are uneducated. All joking, uneducated people are decent. All gracious people are bodied. Meryl is not gracious.", "logic": "\nTopped(dolli)\nDecent(dolli)\nBrachiate(dolli)\nJoking(meryl)\nTopped(meryl)\nGracious(meryl)\nBodied(meryl)\nDecent(meryl)\nBrachiate(meryl)\nUneducated(meryl)\nJoking(randolf)\nBodied(randolf)\nBrachiate(randolf)\nBodied(milo)\nBrachiate(milo)\nforall x (Bodied(x) and Joking(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and Decent(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nBodied(milo) -> Decent(milo)\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Gracious(x))\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Brachiate(x))\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Joking(x) and Uneducated(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Bodied(x))\n\nnot Gracious(meryl)\n\ntherefore Gracious(meryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Kaitlynn is belemnitic. Kaitlynn is unequaled. Kaitlynn is touching. Ryan is postnatal. Ryan is belemnitic. Ryan is frontal. Ryan is reddened. Ryan is unequaled. Ryan is touching. Ryan is emergent. Nela is postnatal. Nela is reddened. Nela is touching. Gerda is reddened. Gerda is touching. All reddened, postnatal people are emergent. If someone is touching and unequaled then they are emergent. If Gerda is reddened then Gerda is unequaled. White people are frontal. Kind people are touching. If someone is frontal then they are emergent. All postnatal, emergent people are unequaled. All frontal people are reddened. Nela is emergent.", "logic": "\nBelemnitic(kaitlynn)\nUnequaled(kaitlynn)\nTouching(kaitlynn)\nPostnatal(ryan)\nBelemnitic(ryan)\nFrontal(ryan)\nReddened(ryan)\nUnequaled(ryan)\nTouching(ryan)\nEmergent(ryan)\nPostnatal(nela)\nReddened(nela)\nTouching(nela)\nReddened(gerda)\nTouching(gerda)\nforall x (Reddened(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Touching(x) and Unequaled(x) -> Emergent(x))\nReddened(gerda) -> Unequaled(gerda)\nforall x (Emergent(x) -> Frontal(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> Touching(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Postnatal(x) and Emergent(x) -> Unequaled(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> Reddened(x))\n\nEmergent(nela)\n\nReddened(nela) and Postnatal(nela) and forall x (Reddened(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Emergent(x)) -> therefore Emergent(nela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Inci is fistular. Inci is dumpy. Inci is pyrolignic. Rorie is enthralled. Rorie is fistular. Rorie is chromatic. Rorie is ruandan. Rorie is dumpy. Rorie is pyrolignic. Rorie is unfair. Northrop is enthralled. Northrop is ruandan. Northrop is pyrolignic. Merril is ruandan. Merril is pyrolignic. All ruandan, enthralled people are unfair. If someone is pyrolignic and dumpy then they are unfair. If Merril is ruandan then Merril is dumpy. White people are chromatic. Kind people are pyrolignic. If someone is chromatic then they are unfair. All enthralled, unfair people are dumpy. All chromatic people are ruandan. Merril is not dumpy.", "logic": "\nFistular(inci)\nDumpy(inci)\nPyrolignic(inci)\nEnthralled(rorie)\nFistular(rorie)\nChromatic(rorie)\nRuandan(rorie)\nDumpy(rorie)\nPyrolignic(rorie)\nUnfair(rorie)\nEnthralled(northrop)\nRuandan(northrop)\nPyrolignic(northrop)\nRuandan(merril)\nPyrolignic(merril)\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Enthralled(x) -> Unfair(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) and Dumpy(x) -> Unfair(x))\nRuandan(merril) -> Dumpy(merril)\nforall x (Unfair(x) -> Chromatic(x))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Unfair(x))\nforall x (Enthralled(x) and Unfair(x) -> Dumpy(x))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Ruandan(x))\n\nnot Dumpy(merril)\n\nRuandan(merril) and Ruandan(merril) -> Dumpy(merril) -> therefore Dumpy(merril)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Wynn is precious. Wynn is deist. Wynn is becoming. Adria is rhymed. Adria is precious. Adria is mercuric. Adria is shodden. Adria is deist. Adria is becoming. Adria is unfaithful. Hermann is rhymed. Hermann is shodden. Hermann is becoming. Wilmar is shodden. Wilmar is becoming. All shodden, rhymed people are unfaithful. If someone is becoming and deist then they are unfaithful. If Wilmar is shodden then Wilmar is deist. White people are mercuric. Kind people are becoming. If someone is mercuric then they are unfaithful. All rhymed, unfaithful people are deist. All mercuric people are shodden. Wynn is mercuric.", "logic": "\nPrecious(wynn)\nDeist(wynn)\nBecoming(wynn)\nRhymed(adria)\nPrecious(adria)\nMercuric(adria)\nShodden(adria)\nDeist(adria)\nBecoming(adria)\nUnfaithful(adria)\nRhymed(hermann)\nShodden(hermann)\nBecoming(hermann)\nShodden(wilmar)\nBecoming(wilmar)\nforall x (Shodden(x) and Rhymed(x) -> Unfaithful(x))\nforall x (Becoming(x) and Deist(x) -> Unfaithful(x))\nShodden(wilmar) -> Deist(wilmar)\nforall x (Unfaithful(x) -> Mercuric(x))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) -> Becoming(x))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) -> Unfaithful(x))\nforall x (Rhymed(x) and Unfaithful(x) -> Deist(x))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) -> Shodden(x))\n\nMercuric(wynn)\n\nBecoming(wynn) and Deist(wynn) and forall x (Becoming(x) and Deist(x) -> Unfaithful(x)) -> therefore Unfaithful(wynn) Unfaithful(wynn) and forall x (Unfaithful(x) -> Mercuric(x)) -> therefore Mercuric(wynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Federica is lithe. Federica is polemic. Federica is glacial. Eveline is iron. Eveline is lithe. Eveline is chafed. Eveline is katabatic. Eveline is polemic. Eveline is glacial. Eveline is disastrous. Hannie is iron. Hannie is katabatic. Hannie is glacial. Sela is katabatic. Sela is glacial. All katabatic, iron people are disastrous. If someone is glacial and polemic then they are disastrous. If Sela is katabatic then Sela is polemic. White people are chafed. Kind people are glacial. If someone is chafed then they are disastrous. All iron, disastrous people are polemic. All chafed people are katabatic. Sela is not disastrous.", "logic": "\nLithe(federica)\nPolemic(federica)\nGlacial(federica)\nIron(eveline)\nLithe(eveline)\nChafed(eveline)\nKatabatic(eveline)\nPolemic(eveline)\nGlacial(eveline)\nDisastrous(eveline)\nIron(hannie)\nKatabatic(hannie)\nGlacial(hannie)\nKatabatic(sela)\nGlacial(sela)\nforall x (Katabatic(x) and Iron(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Glacial(x) and Polemic(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nKatabatic(sela) -> Polemic(sela)\nforall x (Disastrous(x) -> Chafed(x))\nforall x (Chafed(x) -> Glacial(x))\nforall x (Chafed(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Iron(x) and Disastrous(x) -> Polemic(x))\nforall x (Chafed(x) -> Katabatic(x))\n\nnot Disastrous(sela)\n\nKatabatic(sela) and Katabatic(sela) -> Polemic(sela) -> therefore Polemic(sela) Glacial(sela) and Polemic(sela) and forall x (Glacial(x) and Polemic(x) -> Disastrous(x)) -> therefore Disastrous(sela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Lazarus is brickly. Lazarus is matt. Lazarus is womanlike. Sherill is vanilla. Sherill is brickly. Sherill is repressing. Sherill is basidial. Sherill is matt. Sherill is womanlike. Sherill is thawed. Haydon is vanilla. Haydon is basidial. Haydon is womanlike. Reta is basidial. Reta is womanlike. All basidial, vanilla people are thawed. If someone is womanlike and matt then they are thawed. If Reta is basidial then Reta is matt. White people are repressing. Kind people are womanlike. If someone is repressing then they are thawed. All vanilla, thawed people are matt. All repressing people are basidial. Reta is repressing.", "logic": "\nBrickly(lazarus)\nMatt(lazarus)\nWomanlike(lazarus)\nVanilla(sherill)\nBrickly(sherill)\nRepressing(sherill)\nBasidial(sherill)\nMatt(sherill)\nWomanlike(sherill)\nThawed(sherill)\nVanilla(haydon)\nBasidial(haydon)\nWomanlike(haydon)\nBasidial(reta)\nWomanlike(reta)\nforall x (Basidial(x) and Vanilla(x) -> Thawed(x))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) and Matt(x) -> Thawed(x))\nBasidial(reta) -> Matt(reta)\nforall x (Thawed(x) -> Repressing(x))\nforall x (Repressing(x) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Repressing(x) -> Thawed(x))\nforall x (Vanilla(x) and Thawed(x) -> Matt(x))\nforall x (Repressing(x) -> Basidial(x))\n\nRepressing(reta)\n\nBasidial(reta) and Basidial(reta) -> Matt(reta) -> therefore Matt(reta) Womanlike(reta) and Matt(reta) and forall x (Womanlike(x) and Matt(x) -> Thawed(x)) -> therefore Thawed(reta) Thawed(reta) and forall x (Thawed(x) -> Repressing(x)) -> therefore Repressing(reta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Isidora is boney. Isidora is poised. Isidora is honorable. Suellen is clinched. Suellen is boney. Suellen is ideal. Suellen is encircled. Suellen is poised. Suellen is honorable. Suellen is neurotic. Dexter is clinched. Dexter is encircled. Dexter is honorable. Rozalie is encircled. Rozalie is honorable. All encircled, clinched people are neurotic. If someone is honorable and poised then they are neurotic. If Rozalie is encircled then Rozalie is poised. White people are ideal. Kind people are honorable. If someone is ideal then they are neurotic. All clinched, neurotic people are poised. All ideal people are encircled. Rozalie is not ideal.", "logic": "\nBoney(isidora)\nPoised(isidora)\nHonorable(isidora)\nClinched(suellen)\nBoney(suellen)\nIdeal(suellen)\nEncircled(suellen)\nPoised(suellen)\nHonorable(suellen)\nNeurotic(suellen)\nClinched(dexter)\nEncircled(dexter)\nHonorable(dexter)\nEncircled(rozalie)\nHonorable(rozalie)\nforall x (Encircled(x) and Clinched(x) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Honorable(x) and Poised(x) -> Neurotic(x))\nEncircled(rozalie) -> Poised(rozalie)\nforall x (Neurotic(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Clinched(x) and Neurotic(x) -> Poised(x))\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Encircled(x))\n\nnot Ideal(rozalie)\n\nEncircled(rozalie) and Encircled(rozalie) -> Poised(rozalie) -> therefore Poised(rozalie) Honorable(rozalie) and Poised(rozalie) and forall x (Honorable(x) and Poised(x) -> Neurotic(x)) -> therefore Neurotic(rozalie) Neurotic(rozalie) and forall x (Neurotic(x) -> Ideal(x)) -> therefore Ideal(rozalie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Ivy is theban. Ivy is synoptical. Ivy is dubious. Tedra is neutral. Tedra is theban. Tedra is demure. Tedra is looted. Tedra is synoptical. Tedra is dubious. Tedra is sterilized. Darth is neutral. Darth is looted. Darth is dubious. Jed is looted. Jed is dubious. All looted, neutral people are sterilized. If someone is dubious and synoptical then they are sterilized. If Jed is looted then Jed is synoptical. White people are demure. Kind people are dubious. If someone is demure then they are sterilized. All neutral, sterilized people are synoptical. All demure people are looted. Jed is not theban.", "logic": "\nTheban(ivy)\nSynoptical(ivy)\nDubious(ivy)\nNeutral(tedra)\nTheban(tedra)\nDemure(tedra)\nLooted(tedra)\nSynoptical(tedra)\nDubious(tedra)\nSterilized(tedra)\nNeutral(darth)\nLooted(darth)\nDubious(darth)\nLooted(jed)\nDubious(jed)\nforall x (Looted(x) and Neutral(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nforall x (Dubious(x) and Synoptical(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nLooted(jed) -> Synoptical(jed)\nforall x (Sterilized(x) -> Demure(x))\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nforall x (Neutral(x) and Sterilized(x) -> Synoptical(x))\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Looted(x))\n\nnot Theban(jed)\n\nnot Theban(jed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Gayle is mutual. Gayle is allegoric. Gayle is cereal. Dacia is nonpublic. Dacia is mutual. Dacia is bound. Dacia is tobagonian. Dacia is allegoric. Dacia is cereal. Dacia is carangid. Ehud is nonpublic. Ehud is tobagonian. Ehud is cereal. Errol is tobagonian. Errol is cereal. All tobagonian, nonpublic people are carangid. If someone is cereal and allegoric then they are carangid. If Errol is tobagonian then Errol is allegoric. White people are bound. Kind people are cereal. If someone is bound then they are carangid. All nonpublic, carangid people are allegoric. All bound people are tobagonian. Gayle is nonpublic.", "logic": "\nMutual(gayle)\nAllegoric(gayle)\nCereal(gayle)\nNonpublic(dacia)\nMutual(dacia)\nBound(dacia)\nTobagonian(dacia)\nAllegoric(dacia)\nCereal(dacia)\nCarangid(dacia)\nNonpublic(ehud)\nTobagonian(ehud)\nCereal(ehud)\nTobagonian(errol)\nCereal(errol)\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) and Nonpublic(x) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) and Allegoric(x) -> Carangid(x))\nTobagonian(errol) -> Allegoric(errol)\nforall x (Carangid(x) -> Bound(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) -> Cereal(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) and Carangid(x) -> Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) -> Tobagonian(x))\n\nNonpublic(gayle)\n\nNonpublic(gayle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Tarra is textual. Tarra is veiled. Tarra is sublunar. Sib is follicular. Sib is textual. Sib is hammy. Sib is sorrowing. Sib is veiled. Sib is sublunar. Sib is draggled. Ashley is follicular. Ashley is sorrowing. Ashley is sublunar. Nanette is sorrowing. Nanette is sublunar. All sorrowing, follicular people are draggled. If someone is sublunar and veiled then they are draggled. If Nanette is sorrowing then Nanette is veiled. White people are hammy. Kind people are sublunar. If someone is hammy then they are draggled. All follicular, draggled people are veiled. All hammy people are sorrowing. Nanette is not follicular.", "logic": "\nTextual(tarra)\nVeiled(tarra)\nSublunar(tarra)\nFollicular(sib)\nTextual(sib)\nHammy(sib)\nSorrowing(sib)\nVeiled(sib)\nSublunar(sib)\nDraggled(sib)\nFollicular(ashley)\nSorrowing(ashley)\nSublunar(ashley)\nSorrowing(nanette)\nSublunar(nanette)\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) and Follicular(x) -> Draggled(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) and Veiled(x) -> Draggled(x))\nSorrowing(nanette) -> Veiled(nanette)\nforall x (Draggled(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Draggled(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Draggled(x) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\n\nnot Follicular(nanette)\n\nnot Follicular(nanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Marcello is licentious. Marcello is homonymic. Marcello is breathless. Leighton is quartzose. Leighton is licentious. Leighton is aboulic. Leighton is nonslip. Leighton is homonymic. Leighton is breathless. Leighton is insecure. Sonnnie is quartzose. Sonnnie is nonslip. Sonnnie is breathless. Ardra is nonslip. Ardra is breathless. All nonslip, quartzose people are insecure. If someone is breathless and homonymic then they are insecure. If Ardra is nonslip then Ardra is homonymic. White people are aboulic. Kind people are breathless. If someone is aboulic then they are insecure. All quartzose, insecure people are homonymic. All aboulic people are nonslip. Sonnnie is licentious.", "logic": "\nLicentious(marcello)\nHomonymic(marcello)\nBreathless(marcello)\nQuartzose(leighton)\nLicentious(leighton)\nAboulic(leighton)\nNonslip(leighton)\nHomonymic(leighton)\nBreathless(leighton)\nInsecure(leighton)\nQuartzose(sonnnie)\nNonslip(sonnnie)\nBreathless(sonnnie)\nNonslip(ardra)\nBreathless(ardra)\nforall x (Nonslip(x) and Quartzose(x) -> Insecure(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) and Homonymic(x) -> Insecure(x))\nNonslip(ardra) -> Homonymic(ardra)\nforall x (Insecure(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Breathless(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Insecure(x))\nforall x (Quartzose(x) and Insecure(x) -> Homonymic(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Nonslip(x))\n\nLicentious(sonnnie)\n\nLicentious(sonnnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "The isa is bruising. The isa ghettoize the kittie. The isa understand the kittie. The kittie does not chase the isa. The kittie is not awned. The kittie is gleeful. The kittie ghettoize the isa. If someone understand the kittie then they need the isa. If someone demolish the kittie then they are not bruising. If someone is awned then they are not unready. If someone understand the isa and they are bruising then the isa does not see the kittie. If someone demolish the isa and they are lilac then the isa does not see the kittie. If someone understand the kittie and the kittie demolish the isa then the isa understand the kittie. If someone is bruising and they need the isa then the isa is awned. If someone is lilac then they see the isa. The kittie is gleeful.", "logic": "\nBruising(isa)\nGhettoize(isa, kittie)\nUnderstand(isa, kittie)\nnot Demolish(kittie, isa)\nnot Awned(kittie)\nGleeful(kittie)\nGhettoize(kittie, isa)\nforall x (Understand(x, kittie) -> Ghettoize(x, isa))\nforall x (Demolish(x, kittie) -> not Bruising(x))\nforall x (Awned(x) -> not Unready(x))\nforall x (Understand(x, isa) and Bruising(x) -> not Understand(isa, kittie))\nforall x (Demolish(x, isa) and Lilac(x) -> not Understand(isa, kittie))\nforall x (Understand(x, kittie) and Demolish(kittie, isa) -> Understand(isa, kittie))\nforall x (Bruising(x) and Ghettoize(x, isa) -> Awned(isa))\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> Understand(x, isa))\n\nGleeful(kittie)\n\ntherefore Gleeful(kittie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The sosanna is tuneful. The sosanna nettle the zerk. The sosanna feast the zerk. The zerk does not chase the sosanna. The zerk is not amphoteric. The zerk is seminal. The zerk nettle the sosanna. If someone feast the zerk then they need the sosanna. If someone aromatize the zerk then they are not tuneful. If someone is amphoteric then they are not symmetric. If someone feast the sosanna and they are tuneful then the sosanna does not see the zerk. If someone aromatize the sosanna and they are discreet then the sosanna does not see the zerk. If someone feast the zerk and the zerk aromatize the sosanna then the sosanna feast the zerk. If someone is tuneful and they need the sosanna then the sosanna is amphoteric. If someone is discreet then they see the sosanna. The sosanna is not tuneful.", "logic": "\nTuneful(sosanna)\nNettle(sosanna, zerk)\nFeast(sosanna, zerk)\nnot Aromatize(zerk, sosanna)\nnot Amphoteric(zerk)\nSeminal(zerk)\nNettle(zerk, sosanna)\nforall x (Feast(x, zerk) -> Nettle(x, sosanna))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, zerk) -> not Tuneful(x))\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) -> not Symmetric(x))\nforall x (Feast(x, sosanna) and Tuneful(x) -> not Feast(sosanna, zerk))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, sosanna) and Discreet(x) -> not Feast(sosanna, zerk))\nforall x (Feast(x, zerk) and Aromatize(zerk, sosanna) -> Feast(sosanna, zerk))\nforall x (Tuneful(x) and Nettle(x, sosanna) -> Amphoteric(sosanna))\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Feast(x, sosanna))\n\nnot Tuneful(sosanna)\n\ntherefore Tuneful(sosanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The margarete is calando. The margarete french the luis. The margarete cripple the luis. The luis does not chase the margarete. The luis is not nonviolent. The luis is unbraced. The luis french the margarete. If someone cripple the luis then they need the margarete. If someone paste the luis then they are not calando. If someone is nonviolent then they are not ecuadorian. If someone cripple the margarete and they are calando then the margarete does not see the luis. If someone paste the margarete and they are overshot then the margarete does not see the luis. If someone cripple the luis and the luis paste the margarete then the margarete cripple the luis. If someone is calando and they need the margarete then the margarete is nonviolent. If someone is overshot then they see the margarete. The margarete french the margarete.", "logic": "\nCalando(margarete)\nFrench(margarete, luis)\nCripple(margarete, luis)\nnot Paste(luis, margarete)\nnot Nonviolent(luis)\nUnbraced(luis)\nFrench(luis, margarete)\nforall x (Cripple(x, luis) -> French(x, margarete))\nforall x (Paste(x, luis) -> not Calando(x))\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) -> not Ecuadorian(x))\nforall x (Cripple(x, margarete) and Calando(x) -> not Cripple(margarete, luis))\nforall x (Paste(x, margarete) and Overshot(x) -> not Cripple(margarete, luis))\nforall x (Cripple(x, luis) and Paste(luis, margarete) -> Cripple(margarete, luis))\nforall x (Calando(x) and French(x, margarete) -> Nonviolent(margarete))\nforall x (Overshot(x) -> Cripple(x, margarete))\n\nFrench(margarete, margarete)\n\nCripple(margarete, luis) and forall x (Cripple(x, luis) -> French(x, margarete)) -> therefore French(margarete, margarete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The roscoe is flavourful. The roscoe feel the moishe. The roscoe ensky the moishe. The moishe does not chase the roscoe. The moishe is not taloned. The moishe is pomaded. The moishe feel the roscoe. If someone ensky the moishe then they need the roscoe. If someone succor the moishe then they are not flavourful. If someone is taloned then they are not involute. If someone ensky the roscoe and they are flavourful then the roscoe does not see the moishe. If someone succor the roscoe and they are robustious then the roscoe does not see the moishe. If someone ensky the moishe and the moishe succor the roscoe then the roscoe ensky the moishe. If someone is flavourful and they need the roscoe then the roscoe is taloned. If someone is robustious then they see the roscoe. The roscoe does not need the roscoe.", "logic": "\nFlavourful(roscoe)\nFeel(roscoe, moishe)\nEnsky(roscoe, moishe)\nnot Succor(moishe, roscoe)\nnot Taloned(moishe)\nPomaded(moishe)\nFeel(moishe, roscoe)\nforall x (Ensky(x, moishe) -> Feel(x, roscoe))\nforall x (Succor(x, moishe) -> not Flavourful(x))\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> not Involute(x))\nforall x (Ensky(x, roscoe) and Flavourful(x) -> not Ensky(roscoe, moishe))\nforall x (Succor(x, roscoe) and Robustious(x) -> not Ensky(roscoe, moishe))\nforall x (Ensky(x, moishe) and Succor(moishe, roscoe) -> Ensky(roscoe, moishe))\nforall x (Flavourful(x) and Feel(x, roscoe) -> Taloned(roscoe))\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> Ensky(x, roscoe))\n\nnot Feel(roscoe, roscoe)\n\nEnsky(roscoe, moishe) and forall x (Ensky(x, moishe) -> Feel(x, roscoe)) -> therefore Feel(roscoe, roscoe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The mickie is mansard. The mickie pearl the carlyle. The mickie fissure the carlyle. The carlyle does not chase the mickie. The carlyle is not blown. The carlyle is accredited. The carlyle pearl the mickie. If someone fissure the carlyle then they need the mickie. If someone merit the carlyle then they are not mansard. If someone is blown then they are not erring. If someone fissure the mickie and they are mansard then the mickie does not see the carlyle. If someone merit the mickie and they are bright then the mickie does not see the carlyle. If someone fissure the carlyle and the carlyle merit the mickie then the mickie fissure the carlyle. If someone is mansard and they need the mickie then the mickie is blown. If someone is bright then they see the mickie. The mickie is blown.", "logic": "\nMansard(mickie)\nPearl(mickie, carlyle)\nFissure(mickie, carlyle)\nnot Merit(carlyle, mickie)\nnot Blown(carlyle)\nAccredited(carlyle)\nPearl(carlyle, mickie)\nforall x (Fissure(x, carlyle) -> Pearl(x, mickie))\nforall x (Merit(x, carlyle) -> not Mansard(x))\nforall x (Blown(x) -> not Erring(x))\nforall x (Fissure(x, mickie) and Mansard(x) -> not Fissure(mickie, carlyle))\nforall x (Merit(x, mickie) and Bright(x) -> not Fissure(mickie, carlyle))\nforall x (Fissure(x, carlyle) and Merit(carlyle, mickie) -> Fissure(mickie, carlyle))\nforall x (Mansard(x) and Pearl(x, mickie) -> Blown(mickie))\nforall x (Bright(x) -> Fissure(x, mickie))\n\nBlown(mickie)\n\nFissure(mickie, carlyle) and forall x (Fissure(x, carlyle) -> Pearl(x, mickie)) -> therefore Pearl(mickie, mickie) Mansard(mickie) and Pearl(mickie, mickie) and forall x (Mansard(x) and Pearl(x, mickie) -> Blown(mickie)) -> therefore Blown(mickie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The stan is counter. The stan plump the clea. The stan niggle the clea. The clea does not chase the stan. The clea is not katharobic. The clea is fidgety. The clea plump the stan. If someone niggle the clea then they need the stan. If someone exhale the clea then they are not counter. If someone is katharobic then they are not adapted. If someone niggle the stan and they are counter then the stan does not see the clea. If someone exhale the stan and they are amnestic then the stan does not see the clea. If someone niggle the clea and the clea exhale the stan then the stan niggle the clea. If someone is counter and they need the stan then the stan is katharobic. If someone is amnestic then they see the stan. The stan is not katharobic.", "logic": "\nCounter(stan)\nPlump(stan, clea)\nNiggle(stan, clea)\nnot Exhale(clea, stan)\nnot Katharobic(clea)\nFidgety(clea)\nPlump(clea, stan)\nforall x (Niggle(x, clea) -> Plump(x, stan))\nforall x (Exhale(x, clea) -> not Counter(x))\nforall x (Katharobic(x) -> not Adapted(x))\nforall x (Niggle(x, stan) and Counter(x) -> not Niggle(stan, clea))\nforall x (Exhale(x, stan) and Amnestic(x) -> not Niggle(stan, clea))\nforall x (Niggle(x, clea) and Exhale(clea, stan) -> Niggle(stan, clea))\nforall x (Counter(x) and Plump(x, stan) -> Katharobic(stan))\nforall x (Amnestic(x) -> Niggle(x, stan))\n\nnot Katharobic(stan)\n\nNiggle(stan, clea) and forall x (Niggle(x, clea) -> Plump(x, stan)) -> therefore Plump(stan, stan) Counter(stan) and Plump(stan, stan) and forall x (Counter(x) and Plump(x, stan) -> Katharobic(stan)) -> therefore Katharobic(stan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The marci is federal. The marci bong the mohammad. The marci cabin the mohammad. The mohammad does not chase the marci. The mohammad is not transposed. The mohammad is judicious. The mohammad bong the marci. If someone cabin the mohammad then they need the marci. If someone interlock the mohammad then they are not federal. If someone is transposed then they are not raining. If someone cabin the marci and they are federal then the marci does not see the mohammad. If someone interlock the marci and they are hilar then the marci does not see the mohammad. If someone cabin the mohammad and the mohammad interlock the marci then the marci cabin the mohammad. If someone is federal and they need the marci then the marci is transposed. If someone is hilar then they see the marci. The marci is not raining.", "logic": "\nFederal(marci)\nBong(marci, mohammad)\nCabin(marci, mohammad)\nnot Interlock(mohammad, marci)\nnot Transposed(mohammad)\nJudicious(mohammad)\nBong(mohammad, marci)\nforall x (Cabin(x, mohammad) -> Bong(x, marci))\nforall x (Interlock(x, mohammad) -> not Federal(x))\nforall x (Transposed(x) -> not Raining(x))\nforall x (Cabin(x, marci) and Federal(x) -> not Cabin(marci, mohammad))\nforall x (Interlock(x, marci) and Hilar(x) -> not Cabin(marci, mohammad))\nforall x (Cabin(x, mohammad) and Interlock(mohammad, marci) -> Cabin(marci, mohammad))\nforall x (Federal(x) and Bong(x, marci) -> Transposed(marci))\nforall x (Hilar(x) -> Cabin(x, marci))\n\nnot Raining(marci)\n\nCabin(marci, mohammad) and forall x (Cabin(x, mohammad) -> Bong(x, marci)) -> therefore Bong(marci, marci) Federal(marci) and Bong(marci, marci) and forall x (Federal(x) and Bong(x, marci) -> Transposed(marci)) -> therefore Transposed(marci) Transposed(marci) and forall x (Transposed(x) -> not Raining(x)) -> therefore not Raining(marci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The izak is contracted. The izak bloviate the zoe. The izak roar the zoe. The zoe does not chase the izak. The zoe is not ablative. The zoe is shut. The zoe bloviate the izak. If someone roar the zoe then they need the izak. If someone madrigal the zoe then they are not contracted. If someone is ablative then they are not ungraded. If someone roar the izak and they are contracted then the izak does not see the zoe. If someone madrigal the izak and they are foremost then the izak does not see the zoe. If someone roar the zoe and the zoe madrigal the izak then the izak roar the zoe. If someone is contracted and they need the izak then the izak is ablative. If someone is foremost then they see the izak. The izak is ungraded.", "logic": "\nContracted(izak)\nBloviate(izak, zoe)\nRoar(izak, zoe)\nnot Madrigal(zoe, izak)\nnot Ablative(zoe)\nShut(zoe)\nBloviate(zoe, izak)\nforall x (Roar(x, zoe) -> Bloviate(x, izak))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, zoe) -> not Contracted(x))\nforall x (Ablative(x) -> not Ungraded(x))\nforall x (Roar(x, izak) and Contracted(x) -> not Roar(izak, zoe))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, izak) and Foremost(x) -> not Roar(izak, zoe))\nforall x (Roar(x, zoe) and Madrigal(zoe, izak) -> Roar(izak, zoe))\nforall x (Contracted(x) and Bloviate(x, izak) -> Ablative(izak))\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Roar(x, izak))\n\nUngraded(izak)\n\nRoar(izak, zoe) and forall x (Roar(x, zoe) -> Bloviate(x, izak)) -> therefore Bloviate(izak, izak) Contracted(izak) and Bloviate(izak, izak) and forall x (Contracted(x) and Bloviate(x, izak) -> Ablative(izak)) -> therefore Ablative(izak) Ablative(izak) and forall x (Ablative(x) -> not Ungraded(x)) -> therefore not Ungraded(izak)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The darya is viceregal. The darya dump the binny. The darya spawn the binny. The binny does not chase the darya. The binny is not recreant. The binny is gaudy. The binny dump the darya. If someone spawn the binny then they need the darya. If someone reline the binny then they are not viceregal. If someone is recreant then they are not mangled. If someone spawn the darya and they are viceregal then the darya does not see the binny. If someone reline the darya and they are hispanic then the darya does not see the binny. If someone spawn the binny and the binny reline the darya then the darya spawn the binny. If someone is viceregal and they need the darya then the darya is recreant. If someone is hispanic then they see the darya. The binny does not see the darya.", "logic": "\nViceregal(darya)\nDump(darya, binny)\nSpawn(darya, binny)\nnot Reline(binny, darya)\nnot Recreant(binny)\nGaudy(binny)\nDump(binny, darya)\nforall x (Spawn(x, binny) -> Dump(x, darya))\nforall x (Reline(x, binny) -> not Viceregal(x))\nforall x (Recreant(x) -> not Mangled(x))\nforall x (Spawn(x, darya) and Viceregal(x) -> not Spawn(darya, binny))\nforall x (Reline(x, darya) and Hispanic(x) -> not Spawn(darya, binny))\nforall x (Spawn(x, binny) and Reline(binny, darya) -> Spawn(darya, binny))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) and Dump(x, darya) -> Recreant(darya))\nforall x (Hispanic(x) -> Spawn(x, darya))\n\nnot Spawn(binny, darya)\n\nforall x (Hispanic(x) -> Spawn(x, darya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The fernanda is scurfy. The fernanda trowel the helga. The fernanda descend the helga. The helga does not chase the fernanda. The helga is not unknowable. The helga is material. The helga trowel the fernanda. If someone descend the helga then they need the fernanda. If someone baste the helga then they are not scurfy. If someone is unknowable then they are not dowdy. If someone descend the fernanda and they are scurfy then the fernanda does not see the helga. If someone baste the fernanda and they are buzzing then the fernanda does not see the helga. If someone descend the helga and the helga baste the fernanda then the fernanda descend the helga. If someone is scurfy and they need the fernanda then the fernanda is unknowable. If someone is buzzing then they see the fernanda. The fernanda descend the fernanda.", "logic": "\nScurfy(fernanda)\nTrowel(fernanda, helga)\nDescend(fernanda, helga)\nnot Baste(helga, fernanda)\nnot Unknowable(helga)\nMaterial(helga)\nTrowel(helga, fernanda)\nforall x (Descend(x, helga) -> Trowel(x, fernanda))\nforall x (Baste(x, helga) -> not Scurfy(x))\nforall x (Unknowable(x) -> not Dowdy(x))\nforall x (Descend(x, fernanda) and Scurfy(x) -> not Descend(fernanda, helga))\nforall x (Baste(x, fernanda) and Buzzing(x) -> not Descend(fernanda, helga))\nforall x (Descend(x, helga) and Baste(helga, fernanda) -> Descend(fernanda, helga))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) and Trowel(x, fernanda) -> Unknowable(fernanda))\nforall x (Buzzing(x) -> Descend(x, fernanda))\n\nDescend(fernanda, fernanda)\n\nforall x (Buzzing(x) -> Descend(x, fernanda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The ransell is pennate. The ransell huff the bertram. The ransell pauperize the bertram. The bertram does not chase the ransell. The bertram is not crossbred. The bertram is eastern. The bertram huff the ransell. If someone pauperize the bertram then they need the ransell. If someone tinge the bertram then they are not pennate. If someone is crossbred then they are not airsick. If someone pauperize the ransell and they are pennate then the ransell does not see the bertram. If someone tinge the ransell and they are thrillful then the ransell does not see the bertram. If someone pauperize the bertram and the bertram tinge the ransell then the ransell pauperize the bertram. If someone is pennate and they need the ransell then the ransell is crossbred. If someone is thrillful then they see the ransell. The ransell does not chase the bertram.", "logic": "\nPennate(ransell)\nHuff(ransell, bertram)\nPauperize(ransell, bertram)\nnot Tinge(bertram, ransell)\nnot Crossbred(bertram)\nEastern(bertram)\nHuff(bertram, ransell)\nforall x (Pauperize(x, bertram) -> Huff(x, ransell))\nforall x (Tinge(x, bertram) -> not Pennate(x))\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> not Airsick(x))\nforall x (Pauperize(x, ransell) and Pennate(x) -> not Pauperize(ransell, bertram))\nforall x (Tinge(x, ransell) and Thrillful(x) -> not Pauperize(ransell, bertram))\nforall x (Pauperize(x, bertram) and Tinge(bertram, ransell) -> Pauperize(ransell, bertram))\nforall x (Pennate(x) and Huff(x, ransell) -> Crossbred(ransell))\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Pauperize(x, ransell))\n\nnot Tinge(ransell, bertram)\n\nnot Tinge(ransell, bertram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The arianne is babelike. The arianne argue the nathanil. The arianne electrify the nathanil. The nathanil does not chase the arianne. The nathanil is not acuminate. The nathanil is mesmerised. The nathanil argue the arianne. If someone electrify the nathanil then they need the arianne. If someone mistake the nathanil then they are not babelike. If someone is acuminate then they are not related. If someone electrify the arianne and they are babelike then the arianne does not see the nathanil. If someone mistake the arianne and they are jocose then the arianne does not see the nathanil. If someone electrify the nathanil and the nathanil mistake the arianne then the arianne electrify the nathanil. If someone is babelike and they need the arianne then the arianne is acuminate. If someone is jocose then they see the arianne. The nathanil electrify the nathanil.", "logic": "\nBabelike(arianne)\nArgue(arianne, nathanil)\nElectrify(arianne, nathanil)\nnot Mistake(nathanil, arianne)\nnot Acuminate(nathanil)\nMesmerised(nathanil)\nArgue(nathanil, arianne)\nforall x (Electrify(x, nathanil) -> Argue(x, arianne))\nforall x (Mistake(x, nathanil) -> not Babelike(x))\nforall x (Acuminate(x) -> not Related(x))\nforall x (Electrify(x, arianne) and Babelike(x) -> not Electrify(arianne, nathanil))\nforall x (Mistake(x, arianne) and Jocose(x) -> not Electrify(arianne, nathanil))\nforall x (Electrify(x, nathanil) and Mistake(nathanil, arianne) -> Electrify(arianne, nathanil))\nforall x (Babelike(x) and Argue(x, arianne) -> Acuminate(arianne))\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Electrify(x, arianne))\n\nElectrify(nathanil, nathanil)\n\nElectrify(nathanil, nathanil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The hewitt is replete. The hewitt intersect the isador. The hewitt commute the isador. The isador does not chase the hewitt. The isador is not faultless. The isador is squeezable. The isador intersect the hewitt. If someone commute the isador then they need the hewitt. If someone stop the isador then they are not replete. If someone is faultless then they are not mechanized. If someone commute the hewitt and they are replete then the hewitt does not see the isador. If someone stop the hewitt and they are dovish then the hewitt does not see the isador. If someone commute the isador and the isador stop the hewitt then the hewitt commute the isador. If someone is replete and they need the hewitt then the hewitt is faultless. If someone is dovish then they see the hewitt. The hewitt is not dovish.", "logic": "\nReplete(hewitt)\nIntersect(hewitt, isador)\nCommute(hewitt, isador)\nnot Stop(isador, hewitt)\nnot Faultless(isador)\nSqueezable(isador)\nIntersect(isador, hewitt)\nforall x (Commute(x, isador) -> Intersect(x, hewitt))\nforall x (Stop(x, isador) -> not Replete(x))\nforall x (Faultless(x) -> not Mechanized(x))\nforall x (Commute(x, hewitt) and Replete(x) -> not Commute(hewitt, isador))\nforall x (Stop(x, hewitt) and Dovish(x) -> not Commute(hewitt, isador))\nforall x (Commute(x, isador) and Stop(isador, hewitt) -> Commute(hewitt, isador))\nforall x (Replete(x) and Intersect(x, hewitt) -> Faultless(hewitt))\nforall x (Dovish(x) -> Commute(x, hewitt))\n\nnot Dovish(hewitt)\n\nnot Dovish(hewitt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The remus is chuffed. The remus wedge the linell. The remus star the linell. The linell does not chase the remus. The linell is not obsessed. The linell is decreased. The linell wedge the remus. If someone star the linell then they need the remus. If someone supplicate the linell then they are not chuffed. If someone is obsessed then they are not hectic. If someone star the remus and they are chuffed then the remus does not see the linell. If someone supplicate the remus and they are flatbottom then the remus does not see the linell. If someone star the linell and the linell supplicate the remus then the remus star the linell. If someone is chuffed and they need the remus then the remus is obsessed. If someone is flatbottom then they see the remus. The remus is decreased.", "logic": "\nChuffed(remus)\nWedge(remus, linell)\nStar(remus, linell)\nnot Supplicate(linell, remus)\nnot Obsessed(linell)\nDecreased(linell)\nWedge(linell, remus)\nforall x (Star(x, linell) -> Wedge(x, remus))\nforall x (Supplicate(x, linell) -> not Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Obsessed(x) -> not Hectic(x))\nforall x (Star(x, remus) and Chuffed(x) -> not Star(remus, linell))\nforall x (Supplicate(x, remus) and Flatbottom(x) -> not Star(remus, linell))\nforall x (Star(x, linell) and Supplicate(linell, remus) -> Star(remus, linell))\nforall x (Chuffed(x) and Wedge(x, remus) -> Obsessed(remus))\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) -> Star(x, remus))\n\nDecreased(remus)\n\nDecreased(remus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The rozelle is easy. The rozelle flare the lynnea. The rozelle bridle the lynnea. The lynnea does not chase the rozelle. The lynnea is not untufted. The lynnea is neighborly. The lynnea flare the rozelle. If someone bridle the lynnea then they need the rozelle. If someone mail the lynnea then they are not easy. If someone is untufted then they are not grumpy. If someone bridle the rozelle and they are easy then the rozelle does not see the lynnea. If someone mail the rozelle and they are massive then the rozelle does not see the lynnea. If someone bridle the lynnea and the lynnea mail the rozelle then the rozelle bridle the lynnea. If someone is easy and they need the rozelle then the rozelle is untufted. If someone is massive then they see the rozelle. The lynnea does not chase the lynnea.", "logic": "\nEasy(rozelle)\nFlare(rozelle, lynnea)\nBridle(rozelle, lynnea)\nnot Mail(lynnea, rozelle)\nnot Untufted(lynnea)\nNeighborly(lynnea)\nFlare(lynnea, rozelle)\nforall x (Bridle(x, lynnea) -> Flare(x, rozelle))\nforall x (Mail(x, lynnea) -> not Easy(x))\nforall x (Untufted(x) -> not Grumpy(x))\nforall x (Bridle(x, rozelle) and Easy(x) -> not Bridle(rozelle, lynnea))\nforall x (Mail(x, rozelle) and Massive(x) -> not Bridle(rozelle, lynnea))\nforall x (Bridle(x, lynnea) and Mail(lynnea, rozelle) -> Bridle(rozelle, lynnea))\nforall x (Easy(x) and Flare(x, rozelle) -> Untufted(rozelle))\nforall x (Massive(x) -> Bridle(x, rozelle))\n\nnot Mail(lynnea, lynnea)\n\nnot Mail(lynnea, lynnea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The laura is septal. The laura repaint the bealle. The laura recompense the bealle. The bealle does not chase the laura. The bealle is not bolometric. The bealle is rattling. The bealle repaint the laura. If someone recompense the bealle then they need the laura. If someone trust the bealle then they are not septal. If someone is bolometric then they are not singsong. If someone recompense the laura and they are septal then the laura does not see the bealle. If someone trust the laura and they are hydrous then the laura does not see the bealle. If someone recompense the bealle and the bealle trust the laura then the laura recompense the bealle. If someone is septal and they need the laura then the laura is bolometric. If someone is hydrous then they see the laura. The bealle repaint the bealle.", "logic": "\nSeptal(laura)\nRepaint(laura, bealle)\nRecompense(laura, bealle)\nnot Trust(bealle, laura)\nnot Bolometric(bealle)\nRattling(bealle)\nRepaint(bealle, laura)\nforall x (Recompense(x, bealle) -> Repaint(x, laura))\nforall x (Trust(x, bealle) -> not Septal(x))\nforall x (Bolometric(x) -> not Singsong(x))\nforall x (Recompense(x, laura) and Septal(x) -> not Recompense(laura, bealle))\nforall x (Trust(x, laura) and Hydrous(x) -> not Recompense(laura, bealle))\nforall x (Recompense(x, bealle) and Trust(bealle, laura) -> Recompense(laura, bealle))\nforall x (Septal(x) and Repaint(x, laura) -> Bolometric(laura))\nforall x (Hydrous(x) -> Recompense(x, laura))\n\nRepaint(bealle, bealle)\n\nRepaint(bealle, bealle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "Madalena is unversed. Madalena is stunned. Madalena is abloom. Madalena is ichorous. Madalena is lienal. Madalena is not amnionic. Madalena is doting. Tressa is unversed. Tressa is stunned. Tressa is abloom. Tressa is ichorous. Tressa is lienal. Tressa is doting. Carolan is stunned. Carolan is amnionic. Carolan is doting. If Tressa is ichorous and Tressa is abloom then Tressa is unversed. If something is lienal then it is doting. All doting, amnionic things are lienal. All unversed, lienal things are abloom. If something is lienal and amnionic then it is unversed. If Carolan is ichorous and Carolan is not amnionic then Carolan is not doting. Madalena is not amnionic.", "logic": "\nUnversed(madalena)\nStunned(madalena)\nAbloom(madalena)\nIchorous(madalena)\nLienal(madalena)\nnot Amnionic(madalena)\nDoting(madalena)\nUnversed(tressa)\nStunned(tressa)\nAbloom(tressa)\nIchorous(tressa)\nLienal(tressa)\nDoting(tressa)\nStunned(carolan)\nAmnionic(carolan)\nDoting(carolan)\nIchorous(tressa) and Abloom(tressa) -> Unversed(tressa)\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Doting(x) and Amnionic(x) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Unversed(x) and Lienal(x) -> Abloom(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Amnionic(x) -> Unversed(x))\nIchorous(carolan) and not Amnionic(carolan) -> not Doting(carolan)\n\nnot Amnionic(madalena)\n\ntherefore not Amnionic(madalena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Slim is overheated. Slim is roseate. Slim is xxxiv. Slim is definable. Slim is recusant. Slim is not geared. Slim is mediated. Miguela is overheated. Miguela is roseate. Miguela is xxxiv. Miguela is definable. Miguela is recusant. Miguela is mediated. Piotr is roseate. Piotr is geared. Piotr is mediated. If Miguela is definable and Miguela is xxxiv then Miguela is overheated. If something is recusant then it is mediated. All mediated, geared things are recusant. All overheated, recusant things are xxxiv. If something is recusant and geared then it is overheated. If Piotr is definable and Piotr is not geared then Piotr is not mediated. Slim is not overheated.", "logic": "\nOverheated(slim)\nRoseate(slim)\nXxxiv(slim)\nDefinable(slim)\nRecusant(slim)\nnot Geared(slim)\nMediated(slim)\nOverheated(miguela)\nRoseate(miguela)\nXxxiv(miguela)\nDefinable(miguela)\nRecusant(miguela)\nMediated(miguela)\nRoseate(piotr)\nGeared(piotr)\nMediated(piotr)\nDefinable(miguela) and Xxxiv(miguela) -> Overheated(miguela)\nforall x (Recusant(x) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Mediated(x) and Geared(x) -> Recusant(x))\nforall x (Overheated(x) and Recusant(x) -> Xxxiv(x))\nforall x (Recusant(x) and Geared(x) -> Overheated(x))\nDefinable(piotr) and not Geared(piotr) -> not Mediated(piotr)\n\nnot Overheated(slim)\n\ntherefore Overheated(slim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Pearle is intrusive. Pearle is snuff. Pearle is affordable. Pearle is nominal. Pearle is sceptical. Pearle is not unfilmed. Pearle is sotho. Kerrie is intrusive. Kerrie is snuff. Kerrie is affordable. Kerrie is nominal. Kerrie is sceptical. Kerrie is sotho. Joann is snuff. Joann is unfilmed. Joann is sotho. If Kerrie is nominal and Kerrie is affordable then Kerrie is intrusive. If something is sceptical then it is sotho. All sotho, unfilmed things are sceptical. All intrusive, sceptical things are affordable. If something is sceptical and unfilmed then it is intrusive. If Joann is nominal and Joann is not unfilmed then Joann is not sotho. Joann is sceptical.", "logic": "\nIntrusive(pearle)\nSnuff(pearle)\nAffordable(pearle)\nNominal(pearle)\nSceptical(pearle)\nnot Unfilmed(pearle)\nSotho(pearle)\nIntrusive(kerrie)\nSnuff(kerrie)\nAffordable(kerrie)\nNominal(kerrie)\nSceptical(kerrie)\nSotho(kerrie)\nSnuff(joann)\nUnfilmed(joann)\nSotho(joann)\nNominal(kerrie) and Affordable(kerrie) -> Intrusive(kerrie)\nforall x (Sceptical(x) -> Sotho(x))\nforall x (Sotho(x) and Unfilmed(x) -> Sceptical(x))\nforall x (Intrusive(x) and Sceptical(x) -> Affordable(x))\nforall x (Sceptical(x) and Unfilmed(x) -> Intrusive(x))\nNominal(joann) and not Unfilmed(joann) -> not Sotho(joann)\n\nSceptical(joann)\n\nSotho(joann) and Unfilmed(joann) and forall x (Sotho(x) and Unfilmed(x) -> Sceptical(x)) -> therefore Sceptical(joann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Legra is prepaid. Legra is equivocal. Legra is vital. Legra is horrifying. Legra is anonymous. Legra is not backhanded. Legra is sweetheart. Abigail is prepaid. Abigail is equivocal. Abigail is vital. Abigail is horrifying. Abigail is anonymous. Abigail is sweetheart. Wolfie is equivocal. Wolfie is backhanded. Wolfie is sweetheart. If Abigail is horrifying and Abigail is vital then Abigail is prepaid. If something is anonymous then it is sweetheart. All sweetheart, backhanded things are anonymous. All prepaid, anonymous things are vital. If something is anonymous and backhanded then it is prepaid. If Wolfie is horrifying and Wolfie is not backhanded then Wolfie is not sweetheart. Wolfie is not anonymous.", "logic": "\nPrepaid(legra)\nEquivocal(legra)\nVital(legra)\nHorrifying(legra)\nAnonymous(legra)\nnot Backhanded(legra)\nSweetheart(legra)\nPrepaid(abigail)\nEquivocal(abigail)\nVital(abigail)\nHorrifying(abigail)\nAnonymous(abigail)\nSweetheart(abigail)\nEquivocal(wolfie)\nBackhanded(wolfie)\nSweetheart(wolfie)\nHorrifying(abigail) and Vital(abigail) -> Prepaid(abigail)\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) and Backhanded(x) -> Anonymous(x))\nforall x (Prepaid(x) and Anonymous(x) -> Vital(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) and Backhanded(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nHorrifying(wolfie) and not Backhanded(wolfie) -> not Sweetheart(wolfie)\n\nnot Anonymous(wolfie)\n\nSweetheart(wolfie) and Backhanded(wolfie) and forall x (Sweetheart(x) and Backhanded(x) -> Anonymous(x)) -> therefore Anonymous(wolfie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Chelsey is unopen. Chelsey is sounding. Chelsey is inelastic. Chelsey is falciform. Chelsey is glinting. Chelsey is not pantheist. Chelsey is untainted. Grace is unopen. Grace is sounding. Grace is inelastic. Grace is falciform. Grace is glinting. Grace is untainted. Scotty is sounding. Scotty is pantheist. Scotty is untainted. If Grace is falciform and Grace is inelastic then Grace is unopen. If something is glinting then it is untainted. All untainted, pantheist things are glinting. All unopen, glinting things are inelastic. If something is glinting and pantheist then it is unopen. If Scotty is falciform and Scotty is not pantheist then Scotty is not untainted. Scotty is unopen.", "logic": "\nUnopen(chelsey)\nSounding(chelsey)\nInelastic(chelsey)\nFalciform(chelsey)\nGlinting(chelsey)\nnot Pantheist(chelsey)\nUntainted(chelsey)\nUnopen(grace)\nSounding(grace)\nInelastic(grace)\nFalciform(grace)\nGlinting(grace)\nUntainted(grace)\nSounding(scotty)\nPantheist(scotty)\nUntainted(scotty)\nFalciform(grace) and Inelastic(grace) -> Unopen(grace)\nforall x (Glinting(x) -> Untainted(x))\nforall x (Untainted(x) and Pantheist(x) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Unopen(x) and Glinting(x) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Glinting(x) and Pantheist(x) -> Unopen(x))\nFalciform(scotty) and not Pantheist(scotty) -> not Untainted(scotty)\n\nUnopen(scotty)\n\nUntainted(scotty) and Pantheist(scotty) and forall x (Untainted(x) and Pantheist(x) -> Glinting(x)) -> therefore Glinting(scotty) Glinting(scotty) and Pantheist(scotty) and forall x (Glinting(x) and Pantheist(x) -> Unopen(x)) -> therefore Unopen(scotty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Layla is sodden. Layla is deceased. Layla is woodsy. Layla is immutable. Layla is drawn. Layla is not pigheaded. Layla is vocal. Fidela is sodden. Fidela is deceased. Fidela is woodsy. Fidela is immutable. Fidela is drawn. Fidela is vocal. Davina is deceased. Davina is pigheaded. Davina is vocal. If Fidela is immutable and Fidela is woodsy then Fidela is sodden. If something is drawn then it is vocal. All vocal, pigheaded things are drawn. All sodden, drawn things are woodsy. If something is drawn and pigheaded then it is sodden. If Davina is immutable and Davina is not pigheaded then Davina is not vocal. Davina is not sodden.", "logic": "\nSodden(layla)\nDeceased(layla)\nWoodsy(layla)\nImmutable(layla)\nDrawn(layla)\nnot Pigheaded(layla)\nVocal(layla)\nSodden(fidela)\nDeceased(fidela)\nWoodsy(fidela)\nImmutable(fidela)\nDrawn(fidela)\nVocal(fidela)\nDeceased(davina)\nPigheaded(davina)\nVocal(davina)\nImmutable(fidela) and Woodsy(fidela) -> Sodden(fidela)\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Vocal(x))\nforall x (Vocal(x) and Pigheaded(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Sodden(x) and Drawn(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) and Pigheaded(x) -> Sodden(x))\nImmutable(davina) and not Pigheaded(davina) -> not Vocal(davina)\n\nnot Sodden(davina)\n\nVocal(davina) and Pigheaded(davina) and forall x (Vocal(x) and Pigheaded(x) -> Drawn(x)) -> therefore Drawn(davina) Drawn(davina) and Pigheaded(davina) and forall x (Drawn(x) and Pigheaded(x) -> Sodden(x)) -> therefore Sodden(davina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Jason is connective. Jason is oleophilic. Jason is tracheal. Jason is mullioned. Jason is icebound. Jason is not rainy. Jason is humane. Madelena is connective. Madelena is oleophilic. Madelena is tracheal. Madelena is mullioned. Madelena is icebound. Madelena is humane. Madel is oleophilic. Madel is rainy. Madel is humane. If Madelena is mullioned and Madelena is tracheal then Madelena is connective. If something is icebound then it is humane. All humane, rainy things are icebound. All connective, icebound things are tracheal. If something is icebound and rainy then it is connective. If Madel is mullioned and Madel is not rainy then Madel is not humane. Madel is tracheal.", "logic": "\nConnective(jason)\nOleophilic(jason)\nTracheal(jason)\nMullioned(jason)\nIcebound(jason)\nnot Rainy(jason)\nHumane(jason)\nConnective(madelena)\nOleophilic(madelena)\nTracheal(madelena)\nMullioned(madelena)\nIcebound(madelena)\nHumane(madelena)\nOleophilic(madel)\nRainy(madel)\nHumane(madel)\nMullioned(madelena) and Tracheal(madelena) -> Connective(madelena)\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Humane(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) and Rainy(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Connective(x) and Icebound(x) -> Tracheal(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) and Rainy(x) -> Connective(x))\nMullioned(madel) and not Rainy(madel) -> not Humane(madel)\n\nTracheal(madel)\n\nHumane(madel) and Rainy(madel) and forall x (Humane(x) and Rainy(x) -> Icebound(x)) -> therefore Icebound(madel) Icebound(madel) and Rainy(madel) and forall x (Icebound(x) and Rainy(x) -> Connective(x)) -> therefore Connective(madel) Humane(madel) and Rainy(madel) and forall x (Humane(x) and Rainy(x) -> Icebound(x)) -> therefore Icebound(madel) Connective(madel) and Icebound(madel) and forall x (Connective(x) and Icebound(x) -> Tracheal(x)) -> therefore Tracheal(madel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Alford is unloving. Alford is perversive. Alford is lathery. Alford is brummagem. Alford is cybernetic. Alford is not spongelike. Alford is smug. Benedikta is unloving. Benedikta is perversive. Benedikta is lathery. Benedikta is brummagem. Benedikta is cybernetic. Benedikta is smug. Tann is perversive. Tann is spongelike. Tann is smug. If Benedikta is brummagem and Benedikta is lathery then Benedikta is unloving. If something is cybernetic then it is smug. All smug, spongelike things are cybernetic. All unloving, cybernetic things are lathery. If something is cybernetic and spongelike then it is unloving. If Tann is brummagem and Tann is not spongelike then Tann is not smug. Tann is not lathery.", "logic": "\nUnloving(alford)\nPerversive(alford)\nLathery(alford)\nBrummagem(alford)\nCybernetic(alford)\nnot Spongelike(alford)\nSmug(alford)\nUnloving(benedikta)\nPerversive(benedikta)\nLathery(benedikta)\nBrummagem(benedikta)\nCybernetic(benedikta)\nSmug(benedikta)\nPerversive(tann)\nSpongelike(tann)\nSmug(tann)\nBrummagem(benedikta) and Lathery(benedikta) -> Unloving(benedikta)\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) -> Smug(x))\nforall x (Smug(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) and Cybernetic(x) -> Lathery(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Unloving(x))\nBrummagem(tann) and not Spongelike(tann) -> not Smug(tann)\n\nnot Lathery(tann)\n\nSmug(tann) and Spongelike(tann) and forall x (Smug(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Cybernetic(x)) -> therefore Cybernetic(tann) Cybernetic(tann) and Spongelike(tann) and forall x (Cybernetic(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Unloving(x)) -> therefore Unloving(tann) Smug(tann) and Spongelike(tann) and forall x (Smug(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Cybernetic(x)) -> therefore Cybernetic(tann) Unloving(tann) and Cybernetic(tann) and forall x (Unloving(x) and Cybernetic(x) -> Lathery(x)) -> therefore Lathery(tann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Glad is wavy. Glad is preceding. Glad is tiered. Glad is upwind. Glad is onstage. Glad is not chewy. Glad is adulterous. Tamas is wavy. Tamas is preceding. Tamas is tiered. Tamas is upwind. Tamas is onstage. Tamas is adulterous. Cindee is preceding. Cindee is chewy. Cindee is adulterous. If Tamas is upwind and Tamas is tiered then Tamas is wavy. If something is onstage then it is adulterous. All adulterous, chewy things are onstage. All wavy, onstage things are tiered. If something is onstage and chewy then it is wavy. If Cindee is upwind and Cindee is not chewy then Cindee is not adulterous. Cindee is not upwind.", "logic": "\nWavy(glad)\nPreceding(glad)\nTiered(glad)\nUpwind(glad)\nOnstage(glad)\nnot Chewy(glad)\nAdulterous(glad)\nWavy(tamas)\nPreceding(tamas)\nTiered(tamas)\nUpwind(tamas)\nOnstage(tamas)\nAdulterous(tamas)\nPreceding(cindee)\nChewy(cindee)\nAdulterous(cindee)\nUpwind(tamas) and Tiered(tamas) -> Wavy(tamas)\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Adulterous(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) and Chewy(x) -> Onstage(x))\nforall x (Wavy(x) and Onstage(x) -> Tiered(x))\nforall x (Onstage(x) and Chewy(x) -> Wavy(x))\nUpwind(cindee) and not Chewy(cindee) -> not Adulterous(cindee)\n\nnot Upwind(cindee)\n\nnot Upwind(cindee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Chloette is rhapsodic. Chloette is unfettered. Chloette is burbling. Chloette is coenobitic. Chloette is tame. Chloette is not stopped. Chloette is gnostic. Cherie is rhapsodic. Cherie is unfettered. Cherie is burbling. Cherie is coenobitic. Cherie is tame. Cherie is gnostic. Geraldo is unfettered. Geraldo is stopped. Geraldo is gnostic. If Cherie is coenobitic and Cherie is burbling then Cherie is rhapsodic. If something is tame then it is gnostic. All gnostic, stopped things are tame. All rhapsodic, tame things are burbling. If something is tame and stopped then it is rhapsodic. If Geraldo is coenobitic and Geraldo is not stopped then Geraldo is not gnostic. Cherie is stopped.", "logic": "\nRhapsodic(chloette)\nUnfettered(chloette)\nBurbling(chloette)\nCoenobitic(chloette)\nTame(chloette)\nnot Stopped(chloette)\nGnostic(chloette)\nRhapsodic(cherie)\nUnfettered(cherie)\nBurbling(cherie)\nCoenobitic(cherie)\nTame(cherie)\nGnostic(cherie)\nUnfettered(geraldo)\nStopped(geraldo)\nGnostic(geraldo)\nCoenobitic(cherie) and Burbling(cherie) -> Rhapsodic(cherie)\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Stopped(x) -> Tame(x))\nforall x (Rhapsodic(x) and Tame(x) -> Burbling(x))\nforall x (Tame(x) and Stopped(x) -> Rhapsodic(x))\nCoenobitic(geraldo) and not Stopped(geraldo) -> not Gnostic(geraldo)\n\nStopped(cherie)\n\nStopped(cherie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "The sara filiate the robina. The robina is argentic. The celia is not pareve. The kacey filiate the celia. If something is annual and it bewhisker the kacey then it filiate the celia. If something bewhisker the celia and it does not need the sara then it bewhisker the sara. If something bewhisker the robina then it is tiresome. If the kacey remind the sara then the sara bewhisker the celia. If something filiate the robina then it bewhisker the robina. If something is tiresome then it is argentic. The sara filiate the robina.", "logic": "\nFiliate(sara, robina)\nArgentic(robina)\nnot Pareve(celia)\nFiliate(kacey, celia)\nforall x (Annual(x) and Bewhisker(x, kacey) -> Filiate(x, celia))\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, celia) and not Filiate(x, sara) -> Bewhisker(x, sara))\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, robina) -> Tiresome(x))\nRemind(kacey, sara) -> Bewhisker(sara, celia)\nforall x (Filiate(x, robina) -> Bewhisker(x, robina))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) -> Argentic(x))\n\nFiliate(sara, robina)\n\ntherefore Filiate(sara, robina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The price beshrew the gilli. The gilli is immoderate. The lamb is not warming. The rollin beshrew the lamb. If something is resiny and it repeat the rollin then it beshrew the lamb. If something repeat the lamb and it does not need the price then it repeat the price. If something repeat the gilli then it is chanceful. If the rollin comprehend the price then the price repeat the lamb. If something beshrew the gilli then it repeat the gilli. If something is chanceful then it is immoderate. The gilli is not immoderate.", "logic": "\nBeshrew(price, gilli)\nImmoderate(gilli)\nnot Warming(lamb)\nBeshrew(rollin, lamb)\nforall x (Resiny(x) and Repeat(x, rollin) -> Beshrew(x, lamb))\nforall x (Repeat(x, lamb) and not Beshrew(x, price) -> Repeat(x, price))\nforall x (Repeat(x, gilli) -> Chanceful(x))\nComprehend(rollin, price) -> Repeat(price, lamb)\nforall x (Beshrew(x, gilli) -> Repeat(x, gilli))\nforall x (Chanceful(x) -> Immoderate(x))\n\nnot Immoderate(gilli)\n\ntherefore Immoderate(gilli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The waylin riddle the antonie. The antonie is loud. The tedd is not cometic. The nanette riddle the tedd. If something is parttime and it semaphore the nanette then it riddle the tedd. If something semaphore the tedd and it does not need the waylin then it semaphore the waylin. If something semaphore the antonie then it is anuretic. If the nanette strive the waylin then the waylin semaphore the tedd. If something riddle the antonie then it semaphore the antonie. If something is anuretic then it is loud. The waylin semaphore the antonie.", "logic": "\nRiddle(waylin, antonie)\nLoud(antonie)\nnot Cometic(tedd)\nRiddle(nanette, tedd)\nforall x (Parttime(x) and Semaphore(x, nanette) -> Riddle(x, tedd))\nforall x (Semaphore(x, tedd) and not Riddle(x, waylin) -> Semaphore(x, waylin))\nforall x (Semaphore(x, antonie) -> Anuretic(x))\nStrive(nanette, waylin) -> Semaphore(waylin, tedd)\nforall x (Riddle(x, antonie) -> Semaphore(x, antonie))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) -> Loud(x))\n\nSemaphore(waylin, antonie)\n\nRiddle(waylin, antonie) and forall x (Riddle(x, antonie) -> Semaphore(x, antonie)) -> therefore Semaphore(waylin, antonie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The rolland attack the lilith. The lilith is turkish. The carilyn is not monochrome. The giralda attack the carilyn. If something is crannied and it match the giralda then it attack the carilyn. If something match the carilyn and it does not need the rolland then it match the rolland. If something match the lilith then it is humorless. If the giralda giggle the rolland then the rolland match the carilyn. If something attack the lilith then it match the lilith. If something is humorless then it is turkish. The rolland does not chase the lilith.", "logic": "\nAttack(rolland, lilith)\nTurkish(lilith)\nnot Monochrome(carilyn)\nAttack(giralda, carilyn)\nforall x (Crannied(x) and Match(x, giralda) -> Attack(x, carilyn))\nforall x (Match(x, carilyn) and not Attack(x, rolland) -> Match(x, rolland))\nforall x (Match(x, lilith) -> Humorless(x))\nGiggle(giralda, rolland) -> Match(rolland, carilyn)\nforall x (Attack(x, lilith) -> Match(x, lilith))\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Turkish(x))\n\nnot Match(rolland, lilith)\n\nAttack(rolland, lilith) and forall x (Attack(x, lilith) -> Match(x, lilith)) -> therefore Match(rolland, lilith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The ahmed judge the charlton. The charlton is maniacal. The joab is not egotistic. The almire judge the joab. If something is transverse and it purge the almire then it judge the joab. If something purge the joab and it does not need the ahmed then it purge the ahmed. If something purge the charlton then it is conductive. If the almire madder the ahmed then the ahmed purge the joab. If something judge the charlton then it purge the charlton. If something is conductive then it is maniacal. The ahmed is conductive.", "logic": "\nJudge(ahmed, charlton)\nManiacal(charlton)\nnot Egotistic(joab)\nJudge(almire, joab)\nforall x (Transverse(x) and Purge(x, almire) -> Judge(x, joab))\nforall x (Purge(x, joab) and not Judge(x, ahmed) -> Purge(x, ahmed))\nforall x (Purge(x, charlton) -> Conductive(x))\nMadder(almire, ahmed) -> Purge(ahmed, joab)\nforall x (Judge(x, charlton) -> Purge(x, charlton))\nforall x (Conductive(x) -> Maniacal(x))\n\nConductive(ahmed)\n\nJudge(ahmed, charlton) and forall x (Judge(x, charlton) -> Purge(x, charlton)) -> therefore Purge(ahmed, charlton) Purge(ahmed, charlton) and forall x (Purge(x, charlton) -> Conductive(x)) -> therefore Conductive(ahmed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The atlanta saunter the brittney. The brittney is canonized. The clayton is not competent. The morly saunter the clayton. If something is readable and it crust the morly then it saunter the clayton. If something crust the clayton and it does not need the atlanta then it crust the atlanta. If something crust the brittney then it is heathen. If the morly rappel the atlanta then the atlanta crust the clayton. If something saunter the brittney then it crust the brittney. If something is heathen then it is canonized. The atlanta is not heathen.", "logic": "\nSaunter(atlanta, brittney)\nCanonized(brittney)\nnot Competent(clayton)\nSaunter(morly, clayton)\nforall x (Readable(x) and Crust(x, morly) -> Saunter(x, clayton))\nforall x (Crust(x, clayton) and not Saunter(x, atlanta) -> Crust(x, atlanta))\nforall x (Crust(x, brittney) -> Heathen(x))\nRappel(morly, atlanta) -> Crust(atlanta, clayton)\nforall x (Saunter(x, brittney) -> Crust(x, brittney))\nforall x (Heathen(x) -> Canonized(x))\n\nnot Heathen(atlanta)\n\nSaunter(atlanta, brittney) and forall x (Saunter(x, brittney) -> Crust(x, brittney)) -> therefore Crust(atlanta, brittney) Crust(atlanta, brittney) and forall x (Crust(x, brittney) -> Heathen(x)) -> therefore Heathen(atlanta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The bryce quell the vicky. The vicky is amoebic. The megen is not corneous. The chaunce quell the megen. If something is benthic and it relearn the chaunce then it quell the megen. If something relearn the megen and it does not need the bryce then it relearn the bryce. If something relearn the vicky then it is puberulent. If the chaunce postdate the bryce then the bryce relearn the megen. If something quell the vicky then it relearn the vicky. If something is puberulent then it is amoebic. The bryce is amoebic.", "logic": "\nQuell(bryce, vicky)\nAmoebic(vicky)\nnot Corneous(megen)\nQuell(chaunce, megen)\nforall x (Benthic(x) and Relearn(x, chaunce) -> Quell(x, megen))\nforall x (Relearn(x, megen) and not Quell(x, bryce) -> Relearn(x, bryce))\nforall x (Relearn(x, vicky) -> Puberulent(x))\nPostdate(chaunce, bryce) -> Relearn(bryce, megen)\nforall x (Quell(x, vicky) -> Relearn(x, vicky))\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Amoebic(x))\n\nAmoebic(bryce)\n\nQuell(bryce, vicky) and forall x (Quell(x, vicky) -> Relearn(x, vicky)) -> therefore Relearn(bryce, vicky) Relearn(bryce, vicky) and forall x (Relearn(x, vicky) -> Puberulent(x)) -> therefore Puberulent(bryce) Puberulent(bryce) and forall x (Puberulent(x) -> Amoebic(x)) -> therefore Amoebic(bryce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The florida hive the shelli. The shelli is dendriform. The gonzalo is not definite. The nedda hive the gonzalo. If something is insensible and it reticulate the nedda then it hive the gonzalo. If something reticulate the gonzalo and it does not need the florida then it reticulate the florida. If something reticulate the shelli then it is purposeful. If the nedda nosedive the florida then the florida reticulate the gonzalo. If something hive the shelli then it reticulate the shelli. If something is purposeful then it is dendriform. The florida is not dendriform.", "logic": "\nHive(florida, shelli)\nDendriform(shelli)\nnot Definite(gonzalo)\nHive(nedda, gonzalo)\nforall x (Insensible(x) and Reticulate(x, nedda) -> Hive(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, gonzalo) and not Hive(x, florida) -> Reticulate(x, florida))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, shelli) -> Purposeful(x))\nNosedive(nedda, florida) -> Reticulate(florida, gonzalo)\nforall x (Hive(x, shelli) -> Reticulate(x, shelli))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) -> Dendriform(x))\n\nnot Dendriform(florida)\n\nHive(florida, shelli) and forall x (Hive(x, shelli) -> Reticulate(x, shelli)) -> therefore Reticulate(florida, shelli) Reticulate(florida, shelli) and forall x (Reticulate(x, shelli) -> Purposeful(x)) -> therefore Purposeful(florida) Purposeful(florida) and forall x (Purposeful(x) -> Dendriform(x)) -> therefore Dendriform(florida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The aridatha ticktack the chrissie. The chrissie is saudi. The evangelia is not kaput. The rosetta ticktack the evangelia. If something is anticipant and it hustle the rosetta then it ticktack the evangelia. If something hustle the evangelia and it does not need the aridatha then it hustle the aridatha. If something hustle the chrissie then it is inspired. If the rosetta archive the aridatha then the aridatha hustle the evangelia. If something ticktack the chrissie then it hustle the chrissie. If something is inspired then it is saudi. The rosetta does not chase the aridatha.", "logic": "\nTicktack(aridatha, chrissie)\nSaudi(chrissie)\nnot Kaput(evangelia)\nTicktack(rosetta, evangelia)\nforall x (Anticipant(x) and Hustle(x, rosetta) -> Ticktack(x, evangelia))\nforall x (Hustle(x, evangelia) and not Ticktack(x, aridatha) -> Hustle(x, aridatha))\nforall x (Hustle(x, chrissie) -> Inspired(x))\nArchive(rosetta, aridatha) -> Hustle(aridatha, evangelia)\nforall x (Ticktack(x, chrissie) -> Hustle(x, chrissie))\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Saudi(x))\n\nnot Hustle(rosetta, aridatha)\n\nforall x (Hustle(x, evangelia) and not Ticktack(x, aridatha) -> Hustle(x, aridatha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The ingaborg warble the kaile. The kaile is spiderly. The arnoldo is not shivering. The kat warble the arnoldo. If something is crapulent and it fancy the kat then it warble the arnoldo. If something fancy the arnoldo and it does not need the ingaborg then it fancy the ingaborg. If something fancy the kaile then it is downstairs. If the kat harpoon the ingaborg then the ingaborg fancy the arnoldo. If something warble the kaile then it fancy the kaile. If something is downstairs then it is spiderly. The arnoldo fancy the ingaborg.", "logic": "\nWarble(ingaborg, kaile)\nSpiderly(kaile)\nnot Shivering(arnoldo)\nWarble(kat, arnoldo)\nforall x (Crapulent(x) and Fancy(x, kat) -> Warble(x, arnoldo))\nforall x (Fancy(x, arnoldo) and not Warble(x, ingaborg) -> Fancy(x, ingaborg))\nforall x (Fancy(x, kaile) -> Downstairs(x))\nHarpoon(kat, ingaborg) -> Fancy(ingaborg, arnoldo)\nforall x (Warble(x, kaile) -> Fancy(x, kaile))\nforall x (Downstairs(x) -> Spiderly(x))\n\nFancy(arnoldo, ingaborg)\n\nforall x (Fancy(x, arnoldo) and not Warble(x, ingaborg) -> Fancy(x, ingaborg)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The loella beep the randa. The randa is adust. The gardner is not chummy. The rollin beep the gardner. If something is lxxxiv and it strengthen the rollin then it beep the gardner. If something strengthen the gardner and it does not need the loella then it strengthen the loella. If something strengthen the randa then it is bounded. If the rollin resell the loella then the loella strengthen the gardner. If something beep the randa then it strengthen the randa. If something is bounded then it is adust. The rollin does not chase the randa.", "logic": "\nBeep(loella, randa)\nAdust(randa)\nnot Chummy(gardner)\nBeep(rollin, gardner)\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) and Strengthen(x, rollin) -> Beep(x, gardner))\nforall x (Strengthen(x, gardner) and not Beep(x, loella) -> Strengthen(x, loella))\nforall x (Strengthen(x, randa) -> Bounded(x))\nResell(rollin, loella) -> Strengthen(loella, gardner)\nforall x (Beep(x, randa) -> Strengthen(x, randa))\nforall x (Bounded(x) -> Adust(x))\n\nnot Strengthen(rollin, randa)\n\nforall x (Beep(x, randa) -> Strengthen(x, randa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The ekaterina claw the hunter. The hunter is noncausal. The ulberto is not curved. The carson claw the ulberto. If something is unparented and it abreact the carson then it claw the ulberto. If something abreact the ulberto and it does not need the ekaterina then it abreact the ekaterina. If something abreact the hunter then it is unthinking. If the carson omit the ekaterina then the ekaterina abreact the ulberto. If something claw the hunter then it abreact the hunter. If something is unthinking then it is noncausal. The ulberto abreact the hunter.", "logic": "\nClaw(ekaterina, hunter)\nNoncausal(hunter)\nnot Curved(ulberto)\nClaw(carson, ulberto)\nforall x (Unparented(x) and Abreact(x, carson) -> Claw(x, ulberto))\nforall x (Abreact(x, ulberto) and not Claw(x, ekaterina) -> Abreact(x, ekaterina))\nforall x (Abreact(x, hunter) -> Unthinking(x))\nOmit(carson, ekaterina) -> Abreact(ekaterina, ulberto)\nforall x (Claw(x, hunter) -> Abreact(x, hunter))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) -> Noncausal(x))\n\nAbreact(ulberto, hunter)\n\nforall x (Claw(x, hunter) -> Abreact(x, hunter)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The florrie amortize the chrystel. The chrystel is reverent. The hal is not creditable. The dalila amortize the hal. If something is randomized and it debouch the dalila then it amortize the hal. If something debouch the hal and it does not need the florrie then it debouch the florrie. If something debouch the chrystel then it is necklike. If the dalila crush the florrie then the florrie debouch the hal. If something amortize the chrystel then it debouch the chrystel. If something is necklike then it is reverent. The chrystel does not visit the chrystel.", "logic": "\nAmortize(florrie, chrystel)\nReverent(chrystel)\nnot Creditable(hal)\nAmortize(dalila, hal)\nforall x (Randomized(x) and Debouch(x, dalila) -> Amortize(x, hal))\nforall x (Debouch(x, hal) and not Amortize(x, florrie) -> Debouch(x, florrie))\nforall x (Debouch(x, chrystel) -> Necklike(x))\nCrush(dalila, florrie) -> Debouch(florrie, hal)\nforall x (Amortize(x, chrystel) -> Debouch(x, chrystel))\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Reverent(x))\n\nnot Crush(chrystel, chrystel)\n\nnot Crush(chrystel, chrystel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The laura bonnet the thia. The thia is unwomanly. The odell is not custom. The rayner bonnet the odell. If something is bisulcate and it price the rayner then it bonnet the odell. If something price the odell and it does not need the laura then it price the laura. If something price the thia then it is zaftig. If the rayner lever the laura then the laura price the odell. If something bonnet the thia then it price the thia. If something is zaftig then it is unwomanly. The thia price the odell.", "logic": "\nBonnet(laura, thia)\nUnwomanly(thia)\nnot Custom(odell)\nBonnet(rayner, odell)\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) and Price(x, rayner) -> Bonnet(x, odell))\nforall x (Price(x, odell) and not Bonnet(x, laura) -> Price(x, laura))\nforall x (Price(x, thia) -> Zaftig(x))\nLever(rayner, laura) -> Price(laura, odell)\nforall x (Bonnet(x, thia) -> Price(x, thia))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) -> Unwomanly(x))\n\nPrice(thia, odell)\n\nPrice(thia, odell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The teodor invert the lavinia. The lavinia is triangular. The kissiah is not idiopathic. The betsy invert the kissiah. If something is wakeful and it allure the betsy then it invert the kissiah. If something allure the kissiah and it does not need the teodor then it allure the teodor. If something allure the lavinia then it is interbred. If the betsy linearise the teodor then the teodor allure the kissiah. If something invert the lavinia then it allure the lavinia. If something is interbred then it is triangular. The kissiah does not need the betsy.", "logic": "\nInvert(teodor, lavinia)\nTriangular(lavinia)\nnot Idiopathic(kissiah)\nInvert(betsy, kissiah)\nforall x (Wakeful(x) and Allure(x, betsy) -> Invert(x, kissiah))\nforall x (Allure(x, kissiah) and not Invert(x, teodor) -> Allure(x, teodor))\nforall x (Allure(x, lavinia) -> Interbred(x))\nLinearise(betsy, teodor) -> Allure(teodor, kissiah)\nforall x (Invert(x, lavinia) -> Allure(x, lavinia))\nforall x (Interbred(x) -> Triangular(x))\n\nnot Invert(kissiah, betsy)\n\nnot Invert(kissiah, betsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The reuven malnourish the herbie. The herbie is vestmented. The samson is not unratable. The thatch malnourish the samson. If something is philippine and it reinstate the thatch then it malnourish the samson. If something reinstate the samson and it does not need the reuven then it reinstate the reuven. If something reinstate the herbie then it is hertzian. If the thatch photograph the reuven then the reuven reinstate the samson. If something malnourish the herbie then it reinstate the herbie. If something is hertzian then it is vestmented. The thatch is unratable.", "logic": "\nMalnourish(reuven, herbie)\nVestmented(herbie)\nnot Unratable(samson)\nMalnourish(thatch, samson)\nforall x (Philippine(x) and Reinstate(x, thatch) -> Malnourish(x, samson))\nforall x (Reinstate(x, samson) and not Malnourish(x, reuven) -> Reinstate(x, reuven))\nforall x (Reinstate(x, herbie) -> Hertzian(x))\nPhotograph(thatch, reuven) -> Reinstate(reuven, samson)\nforall x (Malnourish(x, herbie) -> Reinstate(x, herbie))\nforall x (Hertzian(x) -> Vestmented(x))\n\nUnratable(thatch)\n\nUnratable(thatch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "Quinton is tucked. Willey is humbling. Jervis is calced. Evanne is tucked. Big things are humbling. All tucked, insensate things are xxiii. All insensate things are tucked. If something is tucked then it is covariant. All humbling things are plumy. All covariant, tucked things are xxiii. Willey is humbling.", "logic": "\nTucked(quinton)\nHumbling(willey)\nCalced(jervis)\nTucked(evanne)\nforall x (Xxiii(x) -> Humbling(x))\nforall x (Tucked(x) and Insensate(x) -> Xxiii(x))\nforall x (Insensate(x) -> Tucked(x))\nforall x (Tucked(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Humbling(x) -> Plumy(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Tucked(x) -> Xxiii(x))\n\nHumbling(willey)\n\ntherefore Humbling(willey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Matthias is barrelled. Welby is squeezable. Chaddie is hispid. Zorina is barrelled. Big things are squeezable. All barrelled, wailful things are bygone. All wailful things are barrelled. If something is barrelled then it is peremptory. All squeezable things are bisexual. All peremptory, barrelled things are bygone. Matthias is not barrelled.", "logic": "\nBarrelled(matthias)\nSqueezable(welby)\nHispid(chaddie)\nBarrelled(zorina)\nforall x (Bygone(x) -> Squeezable(x))\nforall x (Barrelled(x) and Wailful(x) -> Bygone(x))\nforall x (Wailful(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nforall x (Barrelled(x) -> Peremptory(x))\nforall x (Squeezable(x) -> Bisexual(x))\nforall x (Peremptory(x) and Barrelled(x) -> Bygone(x))\n\nnot Barrelled(matthias)\n\ntherefore Barrelled(matthias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Ulick is sculptured. Caritta is antenatal. Darline is circular. Joya is sculptured. Big things are antenatal. All sculptured, highbrow things are uncoerced. All highbrow things are sculptured. If something is sculptured then it is geocentric. All antenatal things are resettled. All geocentric, sculptured things are uncoerced. Ulick is geocentric.", "logic": "\nSculptured(ulick)\nAntenatal(caritta)\nCircular(darline)\nSculptured(joya)\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Antenatal(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) and Highbrow(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Antenatal(x) -> Resettled(x))\nforall x (Geocentric(x) and Sculptured(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\n\nGeocentric(ulick)\n\nSculptured(ulick) and forall x (Sculptured(x) -> Geocentric(x)) -> therefore Geocentric(ulick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Binny is lapsed. Cora is leeward. Lian is uniate. Jane is lapsed. Big things are leeward. All lapsed, formative things are lapidarian. All formative things are lapsed. If something is lapsed then it is wildcat. All leeward things are appositive. All wildcat, lapsed things are lapidarian. Binny is not wildcat.", "logic": "\nLapsed(binny)\nLeeward(cora)\nUniate(lian)\nLapsed(jane)\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) -> Leeward(x))\nforall x (Lapsed(x) and Formative(x) -> Lapidarian(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) -> Lapsed(x))\nforall x (Lapsed(x) -> Wildcat(x))\nforall x (Leeward(x) -> Appositive(x))\nforall x (Wildcat(x) and Lapsed(x) -> Lapidarian(x))\n\nnot Wildcat(binny)\n\nLapsed(binny) and forall x (Lapsed(x) -> Wildcat(x)) -> therefore Wildcat(binny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Darrell is strapless. Andriana is edifying. Isador is hypodermic. Dmitri is strapless. Big things are edifying. All strapless, dignified things are bleak. All dignified things are strapless. If something is strapless then it is conniving. All edifying things are relational. All conniving, strapless things are bleak. Darrell is bleak.", "logic": "\nStrapless(darrell)\nEdifying(andriana)\nHypodermic(isador)\nStrapless(dmitri)\nforall x (Bleak(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) and Dignified(x) -> Bleak(x))\nforall x (Dignified(x) -> Strapless(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) -> Relational(x))\nforall x (Conniving(x) and Strapless(x) -> Bleak(x))\n\nBleak(darrell)\n\nStrapless(darrell) and forall x (Strapless(x) -> Conniving(x)) -> therefore Conniving(darrell) Conniving(darrell) and Strapless(darrell) and forall x (Conniving(x) and Strapless(x) -> Bleak(x)) -> therefore Bleak(darrell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Mei is motionless. Karyl is chanted. Rem is teentsy. Kirsteni is motionless. Big things are chanted. All motionless, skirting things are tried. All skirting things are motionless. If something is motionless then it is methodical. All chanted things are fourpenny. All methodical, motionless things are tried. Mei is not tried.", "logic": "\nMotionless(mei)\nChanted(karyl)\nTeentsy(rem)\nMotionless(kirsteni)\nforall x (Tried(x) -> Chanted(x))\nforall x (Motionless(x) and Skirting(x) -> Tried(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Motionless(x))\nforall x (Motionless(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Fourpenny(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) and Motionless(x) -> Tried(x))\n\nnot Tried(mei)\n\nMotionless(mei) and forall x (Motionless(x) -> Methodical(x)) -> therefore Methodical(mei) Methodical(mei) and Motionless(mei) and forall x (Methodical(x) and Motionless(x) -> Tried(x)) -> therefore Tried(mei)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Blondie is andalusian. Love is chromatic. Isadore is coordinate. Jennette is andalusian. Big things are chromatic. All andalusian, nonplussed things are temporary. All nonplussed things are andalusian. If something is andalusian then it is descendant. All chromatic things are tubeless. All descendant, andalusian things are temporary. Jennette is chromatic.", "logic": "\nAndalusian(blondie)\nChromatic(love)\nCoordinate(isadore)\nAndalusian(jennette)\nforall x (Temporary(x) -> Chromatic(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Nonplussed(x) -> Temporary(x))\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> Descendant(x))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Tubeless(x))\nforall x (Descendant(x) and Andalusian(x) -> Temporary(x))\n\nChromatic(jennette)\n\nAndalusian(jennette) and forall x (Andalusian(x) -> Descendant(x)) -> therefore Descendant(jennette) Descendant(jennette) and Andalusian(jennette) and forall x (Descendant(x) and Andalusian(x) -> Temporary(x)) -> therefore Temporary(jennette) Temporary(jennette) and forall x (Temporary(x) -> Chromatic(x)) -> therefore Chromatic(jennette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Madelina is lenten. Ranna is paired. Philipa is prospering. Joan is lenten. Big things are paired. All lenten, unshaken things are sumptuary. All unshaken things are lenten. If something is lenten then it is upstream. All paired things are inherited. All upstream, lenten things are sumptuary. Madelina is not paired.", "logic": "\nLenten(madelina)\nPaired(ranna)\nProspering(philipa)\nLenten(joan)\nforall x (Sumptuary(x) -> Paired(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) and Unshaken(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) -> Upstream(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Inherited(x))\nforall x (Upstream(x) and Lenten(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\n\nnot Paired(madelina)\n\nLenten(madelina) and forall x (Lenten(x) -> Upstream(x)) -> therefore Upstream(madelina) Upstream(madelina) and Lenten(madelina) and forall x (Upstream(x) and Lenten(x) -> Sumptuary(x)) -> therefore Sumptuary(madelina) Sumptuary(madelina) and forall x (Sumptuary(x) -> Paired(x)) -> therefore Paired(madelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Sharron is palpebrate. Wilden is fanlike. Evanne is hiemal. Sonny is palpebrate. Big things are fanlike. All palpebrate, couchant things are ampullar. All couchant things are palpebrate. If something is palpebrate then it is given. All fanlike things are afrikaner. All given, palpebrate things are ampullar. Wilden is not palpebrate.", "logic": "\nPalpebrate(sharron)\nFanlike(wilden)\nHiemal(evanne)\nPalpebrate(sonny)\nforall x (Ampullar(x) -> Fanlike(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and Couchant(x) -> Ampullar(x))\nforall x (Couchant(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Given(x))\nforall x (Fanlike(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Given(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Ampullar(x))\n\nnot Palpebrate(wilden)\n\nforall x (Couchant(x) -> Palpebrate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Norwood is ringed. Connie is semiarid. Myles is immunized. Ericha is ringed. Big things are semiarid. All ringed, preteen things are model. All preteen things are ringed. If something is ringed then it is littered. All semiarid things are over. All littered, ringed things are model. Myles is littered.", "logic": "\nRinged(norwood)\nSemiarid(connie)\nImmunized(myles)\nRinged(ericha)\nforall x (Model(x) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Ringed(x) and Preteen(x) -> Model(x))\nforall x (Preteen(x) -> Ringed(x))\nforall x (Ringed(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) -> Over(x))\nforall x (Littered(x) and Ringed(x) -> Model(x))\n\nLittered(myles)\n\nforall x (Ringed(x) -> Littered(x)) <- forall x (Preteen(x) -> Ringed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Merrie is wrecked. Prasun is billed. Davon is surgical. Marika is wrecked. Big things are billed. All wrecked, waste things are bahraini. All waste things are wrecked. If something is wrecked then it is migratory. All billed things are reniform. All migratory, wrecked things are bahraini. Davon is not billed.", "logic": "\nWrecked(merrie)\nBilled(prasun)\nSurgical(davon)\nWrecked(marika)\nforall x (Bahraini(x) -> Billed(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) and Waste(x) -> Bahraini(x))\nforall x (Waste(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> Migratory(x))\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Reniform(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Wrecked(x) -> Bahraini(x))\n\nnot Billed(davon)\n\nforall x (Bahraini(x) -> Billed(x)) <- forall x (Migratory(x) and Wrecked(x) -> Bahraini(x)) <- forall x (Waste(x) -> Wrecked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Pauly is semilunar. Sandi is dendriform. Clemence is blame. Patrick is semilunar. Big things are dendriform. All semilunar, modest things are registered. All modest things are semilunar. If something is semilunar then it is unangry. All dendriform things are diarrheal. All unangry, semilunar things are registered. Clemence is registered.", "logic": "\nSemilunar(pauly)\nDendriform(sandi)\nBlame(clemence)\nSemilunar(patrick)\nforall x (Registered(x) -> Dendriform(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) and Modest(x) -> Registered(x))\nforall x (Modest(x) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Unangry(x))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) -> Diarrheal(x))\nforall x (Unangry(x) and Semilunar(x) -> Registered(x))\n\nRegistered(clemence)\n\nforall x (Unangry(x) and Semilunar(x) -> Registered(x)) <- forall x (Modest(x) -> Semilunar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Sven is anamnestic. Howie is flinty. Tobey is past. Bruce is anamnestic. Big things are flinty. All anamnestic, stinky things are terefah. All stinky things are anamnestic. If something is anamnestic then it is expressed. All flinty things are ceruminous. All expressed, anamnestic things are terefah. Bruce is not past.", "logic": "\nAnamnestic(sven)\nFlinty(howie)\nPast(tobey)\nAnamnestic(bruce)\nforall x (Terefah(x) -> Flinty(x))\nforall x (Anamnestic(x) and Stinky(x) -> Terefah(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) -> Anamnestic(x))\nforall x (Anamnestic(x) -> Expressed(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Anamnestic(x) -> Terefah(x))\n\nnot Past(bruce)\n\nnot Past(bruce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Wilhelm is undrawn. Vikkie is amok. Sydney is gaussian. Horst is undrawn. Big things are amok. All undrawn, collected things are huffy. All collected things are undrawn. If something is undrawn then it is immiscible. All amok things are spinose. All immiscible, undrawn things are huffy. Vikkie is collected.", "logic": "\nUndrawn(wilhelm)\nAmok(vikkie)\nGaussian(sydney)\nUndrawn(horst)\nforall x (Huffy(x) -> Amok(x))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Collected(x) -> Huffy(x))\nforall x (Collected(x) -> Undrawn(x))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) -> Immiscible(x))\nforall x (Amok(x) -> Spinose(x))\nforall x (Immiscible(x) and Undrawn(x) -> Huffy(x))\n\nCollected(vikkie)\n\nCollected(vikkie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Adelina is unbarred. Tricia is unlikable. Russel is auburn. Ingeberg is unbarred. Big things are unlikable. All unbarred, favorite things are meritable. All favorite things are unbarred. If something is unbarred then it is nectarous. All unlikable things are burnable. All nectarous, unbarred things are meritable. Adelina is not favorite.", "logic": "\nUnbarred(adelina)\nUnlikable(tricia)\nAuburn(russel)\nUnbarred(ingeberg)\nforall x (Meritable(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) and Favorite(x) -> Meritable(x))\nforall x (Favorite(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Unlikable(x) -> Burnable(x))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) and Unbarred(x) -> Meritable(x))\n\nnot Favorite(adelina)\n\nnot Favorite(adelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Bogdan is happy. Lynnet is stereo. Natalya is unhallowed. Tucker is happy. Big things are stereo. All happy, bullnecked things are distracted. All bullnecked things are happy. If something is happy then it is derelict. All stereo things are biblical. All derelict, happy things are distracted. Tucker is bullnecked.", "logic": "\nHappy(bogdan)\nStereo(lynnet)\nUnhallowed(natalya)\nHappy(tucker)\nforall x (Distracted(x) -> Stereo(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) and Bullnecked(x) -> Distracted(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) -> Derelict(x))\nforall x (Stereo(x) -> Biblical(x))\nforall x (Derelict(x) and Happy(x) -> Distracted(x))\n\nBullnecked(tucker)\n\nBullnecked(tucker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Nicholle is reputable. If someone is nonnatural then they are not unsated. If Nicholle is reputable and Nicholle is unsated then Nicholle is apropos. All apropos people are reputable. All meridian people are spacy. Round, apropos people are not nonnatural. If someone is spacy then they are not apropos. If someone is reputable then they are meridian. All apropos people are unlivable. Nicholle is reputable.", "logic": "\nReputable(nicholle)\nforall x (Nonnatural(x) -> not Unsated(x))\nReputable(nicholle) and Unsated(nicholle) -> Apropos(nicholle)\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Reputable(x))\nforall x (Meridian(x) -> Spacy(x))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Apropos(x) -> not Nonnatural(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> not Apropos(x))\nforall x (Reputable(x) -> Meridian(x))\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Unlivable(x))\n\nReputable(nicholle)\n\ntherefore Reputable(nicholle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Shandee is serrulate. If someone is thawed then they are not stagey. If Shandee is serrulate and Shandee is stagey then Shandee is libertine. All libertine people are serrulate. All junoesque people are diatonic. Round, libertine people are not thawed. If someone is diatonic then they are not libertine. If someone is serrulate then they are junoesque. All libertine people are concluded. Shandee is not serrulate.", "logic": "\nSerrulate(shandee)\nforall x (Thawed(x) -> not Stagey(x))\nSerrulate(shandee) and Stagey(shandee) -> Libertine(shandee)\nforall x (Libertine(x) -> Serrulate(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Diatonic(x))\nforall x (Concluded(x) and Libertine(x) -> not Thawed(x))\nforall x (Diatonic(x) -> not Libertine(x))\nforall x (Serrulate(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Libertine(x) -> Concluded(x))\n\nnot Serrulate(shandee)\n\ntherefore Serrulate(shandee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Rosella is pineal. If someone is lidded then they are not bitty. If Rosella is pineal and Rosella is bitty then Rosella is faithless. All faithless people are pineal. All collarless people are biographic. Round, faithless people are not lidded. If someone is biographic then they are not faithless. If someone is pineal then they are collarless. All faithless people are manque. Rosella is collarless.", "logic": "\nPineal(rosella)\nforall x (Lidded(x) -> not Bitty(x))\nPineal(rosella) and Bitty(rosella) -> Faithless(rosella)\nforall x (Faithless(x) -> Pineal(x))\nforall x (Collarless(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) and Faithless(x) -> not Lidded(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> not Faithless(x))\nforall x (Pineal(x) -> Collarless(x))\nforall x (Faithless(x) -> Manque(x))\n\nCollarless(rosella)\n\nPineal(rosella) and forall x (Pineal(x) -> Collarless(x)) -> therefore Collarless(rosella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Dianna is diacritic. If someone is crooked then they are not specious. If Dianna is diacritic and Dianna is specious then Dianna is exsanguine. All exsanguine people are diacritic. All sufferable people are septal. Round, exsanguine people are not crooked. If someone is septal then they are not exsanguine. If someone is diacritic then they are sufferable. All exsanguine people are fitted. Dianna is not sufferable.", "logic": "\nDiacritic(dianna)\nforall x (Crooked(x) -> not Specious(x))\nDiacritic(dianna) and Specious(dianna) -> Exsanguine(dianna)\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) -> Diacritic(x))\nforall x (Sufferable(x) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) and Exsanguine(x) -> not Crooked(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) -> not Exsanguine(x))\nforall x (Diacritic(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) -> Fitted(x))\n\nnot Sufferable(dianna)\n\nDiacritic(dianna) and forall x (Diacritic(x) -> Sufferable(x)) -> therefore Sufferable(dianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Hillery is bulbar. If someone is blabby then they are not blotched. If Hillery is bulbar and Hillery is blotched then Hillery is garbed. All garbed people are bulbar. All tinpot people are thorny. Round, garbed people are not blabby. If someone is thorny then they are not garbed. If someone is bulbar then they are tinpot. All garbed people are nightlong. Hillery is thorny.", "logic": "\nBulbar(hillery)\nforall x (Blabby(x) -> not Blotched(x))\nBulbar(hillery) and Blotched(hillery) -> Garbed(hillery)\nforall x (Garbed(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Tinpot(x) -> Thorny(x))\nforall x (Nightlong(x) and Garbed(x) -> not Blabby(x))\nforall x (Thorny(x) -> not Garbed(x))\nforall x (Bulbar(x) -> Tinpot(x))\nforall x (Garbed(x) -> Nightlong(x))\n\nThorny(hillery)\n\nBulbar(hillery) and forall x (Bulbar(x) -> Tinpot(x)) -> therefore Tinpot(hillery) Tinpot(hillery) and forall x (Tinpot(x) -> Thorny(x)) -> therefore Thorny(hillery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Kassie is cancroid. If someone is fevered then they are not mantic. If Kassie is cancroid and Kassie is mantic then Kassie is diestrous. All diestrous people are cancroid. All inbound people are entranced. Round, diestrous people are not fevered. If someone is entranced then they are not diestrous. If someone is cancroid then they are inbound. All diestrous people are areal. Kassie is not entranced.", "logic": "\nCancroid(kassie)\nforall x (Fevered(x) -> not Mantic(x))\nCancroid(kassie) and Mantic(kassie) -> Diestrous(kassie)\nforall x (Diestrous(x) -> Cancroid(x))\nforall x (Inbound(x) -> Entranced(x))\nforall x (Areal(x) and Diestrous(x) -> not Fevered(x))\nforall x (Entranced(x) -> not Diestrous(x))\nforall x (Cancroid(x) -> Inbound(x))\nforall x (Diestrous(x) -> Areal(x))\n\nnot Entranced(kassie)\n\nCancroid(kassie) and forall x (Cancroid(x) -> Inbound(x)) -> therefore Inbound(kassie) Inbound(kassie) and forall x (Inbound(x) -> Entranced(x)) -> therefore Entranced(kassie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Ric is unbound. If someone is dissident then they are not color. If Ric is unbound and Ric is color then Ric is ascendible. All ascendible people are unbound. All acuminate people are mutual. Round, ascendible people are not dissident. If someone is mutual then they are not ascendible. If someone is unbound then they are acuminate. All ascendible people are concessive. Ric is not ascendible.", "logic": "\nUnbound(ric)\nforall x (Dissident(x) -> not Color(x))\nUnbound(ric) and Color(ric) -> Ascendible(ric)\nforall x (Ascendible(x) -> Unbound(x))\nforall x (Acuminate(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Concessive(x) and Ascendible(x) -> not Dissident(x))\nforall x (Mutual(x) -> not Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Acuminate(x))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) -> Concessive(x))\n\nnot Ascendible(ric)\n\nUnbound(ric) and forall x (Unbound(x) -> Acuminate(x)) -> therefore Acuminate(ric) Acuminate(ric) and forall x (Acuminate(x) -> Mutual(x)) -> therefore Mutual(ric) Mutual(ric) and forall x (Mutual(x) -> not Ascendible(x)) -> therefore not Ascendible(ric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Eduardo is delicate. If someone is unbloody then they are not expansible. If Eduardo is delicate and Eduardo is expansible then Eduardo is incurious. All incurious people are delicate. All adulterant people are direful. Round, incurious people are not unbloody. If someone is direful then they are not incurious. If someone is delicate then they are adulterant. All incurious people are granulose. Eduardo is incurious.", "logic": "\nDelicate(eduardo)\nforall x (Unbloody(x) -> not Expansible(x))\nDelicate(eduardo) and Expansible(eduardo) -> Incurious(eduardo)\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> Direful(x))\nforall x (Granulose(x) and Incurious(x) -> not Unbloody(x))\nforall x (Direful(x) -> not Incurious(x))\nforall x (Delicate(x) -> Adulterant(x))\nforall x (Incurious(x) -> Granulose(x))\n\nIncurious(eduardo)\n\nDelicate(eduardo) and forall x (Delicate(x) -> Adulterant(x)) -> therefore Adulterant(eduardo) Adulterant(eduardo) and forall x (Adulterant(x) -> Direful(x)) -> therefore Direful(eduardo) Direful(eduardo) and forall x (Direful(x) -> not Incurious(x)) -> therefore not Incurious(eduardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Trudy is crustal. If someone is lendable then they are not phrenetic. If Trudy is crustal and Trudy is phrenetic then Trudy is pharyngeal. All pharyngeal people are crustal. All buggy people are revered. Round, pharyngeal people are not lendable. If someone is revered then they are not pharyngeal. If someone is crustal then they are buggy. All pharyngeal people are campanular. Trudy is not campanular.", "logic": "\nCrustal(trudy)\nforall x (Lendable(x) -> not Phrenetic(x))\nCrustal(trudy) and Phrenetic(trudy) -> Pharyngeal(trudy)\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) -> Crustal(x))\nforall x (Buggy(x) -> Revered(x))\nforall x (Campanular(x) and Pharyngeal(x) -> not Lendable(x))\nforall x (Revered(x) -> not Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) -> Buggy(x))\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) -> Campanular(x))\n\nnot Campanular(trudy)\n\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) -> Campanular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Federica is vindictive. If someone is puerperal then they are not unreadable. If Federica is vindictive and Federica is unreadable then Federica is andantino. All andantino people are vindictive. All here people are stalinist. Round, andantino people are not puerperal. If someone is stalinist then they are not andantino. If someone is vindictive then they are here. All andantino people are motive. Federica is puerperal.", "logic": "\nVindictive(federica)\nforall x (Puerperal(x) -> not Unreadable(x))\nVindictive(federica) and Unreadable(federica) -> Andantino(federica)\nforall x (Andantino(x) -> Vindictive(x))\nforall x (Here(x) -> Stalinist(x))\nforall x (Motive(x) and Andantino(x) -> not Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Stalinist(x) -> not Andantino(x))\nforall x (Vindictive(x) -> Here(x))\nforall x (Andantino(x) -> Motive(x))\n\nPuerperal(federica)\n\nPuerperal(federica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "The renell is xenophobic. The scotty compete the renell. If the scotty crate the renell and the scotty is bereaved then the scotty journey the renell. If something journey the renell and it is bicorn then the renell is cxxx. If something journey the scotty and the scotty compete the renell then the renell crate the scotty. If something crate the scotty then the scotty crate the renell. If the renell is xenophobic then the renell journey the scotty. If something crate the renell and it journey the scotty then it compete the scotty. If the renell crate the scotty and the scotty compete the renell then the scotty crate the renell. If something compete the renell then the renell is bereaved. The renell is xenophobic.", "logic": "\nXenophobic(renell)\nCompete(scotty, renell)\nCrate(scotty, renell) and Bereaved(scotty) -> Journey(scotty, renell)\nforall x (Journey(x, renell) and Bicorn(x) -> Cxxx(renell))\nforall x (Journey(x, scotty) and Compete(scotty, renell) -> Crate(renell, scotty))\nforall x (Crate(x, scotty) -> Crate(scotty, renell))\nXenophobic(renell) -> Journey(renell, scotty)\nforall x (Crate(x, renell) and Journey(x, scotty) -> Compete(x, scotty))\nCrate(renell, scotty) and Compete(scotty, renell) -> Crate(scotty, renell)\nforall x (Compete(x, renell) -> Bereaved(renell))\n\nXenophobic(renell)\n\ntherefore Xenophobic(renell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The cherin is acned. The milicent rhapsodise the cherin. If the milicent reenact the cherin and the milicent is occurrent then the milicent bond the cherin. If something bond the cherin and it is catenulate then the cherin is west. If something bond the milicent and the milicent rhapsodise the cherin then the cherin reenact the milicent. If something reenact the milicent then the milicent reenact the cherin. If the cherin is acned then the cherin bond the milicent. If something reenact the cherin and it bond the milicent then it rhapsodise the milicent. If the cherin reenact the milicent and the milicent rhapsodise the cherin then the milicent reenact the cherin. If something rhapsodise the cherin then the cherin is occurrent. The cherin is not acned.", "logic": "\nAcned(cherin)\nRhapsodise(milicent, cherin)\nReenact(milicent, cherin) and Occurrent(milicent) -> Bond(milicent, cherin)\nforall x (Bond(x, cherin) and Catenulate(x) -> West(cherin))\nforall x (Bond(x, milicent) and Rhapsodise(milicent, cherin) -> Reenact(cherin, milicent))\nforall x (Reenact(x, milicent) -> Reenact(milicent, cherin))\nAcned(cherin) -> Bond(cherin, milicent)\nforall x (Reenact(x, cherin) and Bond(x, milicent) -> Rhapsodise(x, milicent))\nReenact(cherin, milicent) and Rhapsodise(milicent, cherin) -> Reenact(milicent, cherin)\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, cherin) -> Occurrent(cherin))\n\nnot Acned(cherin)\n\ntherefore Acned(cherin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The jonas is preceding. The hans weld the jonas. If the hans stack the jonas and the hans is totipotent then the hans refine the jonas. If something refine the jonas and it is decorated then the jonas is away. If something refine the hans and the hans weld the jonas then the jonas stack the hans. If something stack the hans then the hans stack the jonas. If the jonas is preceding then the jonas refine the hans. If something stack the jonas and it refine the hans then it weld the hans. If the jonas stack the hans and the hans weld the jonas then the hans stack the jonas. If something weld the jonas then the jonas is totipotent. The jonas refine the hans.", "logic": "\nPreceding(jonas)\nWeld(hans, jonas)\nStack(hans, jonas) and Totipotent(hans) -> Refine(hans, jonas)\nforall x (Refine(x, jonas) and Decorated(x) -> Away(jonas))\nforall x (Refine(x, hans) and Weld(hans, jonas) -> Stack(jonas, hans))\nforall x (Stack(x, hans) -> Stack(hans, jonas))\nPreceding(jonas) -> Refine(jonas, hans)\nforall x (Stack(x, jonas) and Refine(x, hans) -> Weld(x, hans))\nStack(jonas, hans) and Weld(hans, jonas) -> Stack(hans, jonas)\nforall x (Weld(x, jonas) -> Totipotent(jonas))\n\nRefine(jonas, hans)\n\nPreceding(jonas) and Preceding(jonas) -> Refine(jonas, hans) -> therefore Refine(jonas, hans)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The jordana is corrupting. The rosamund perceive the jordana. If the rosamund capsule the jordana and the rosamund is unmanly then the rosamund denazify the jordana. If something denazify the jordana and it is unsorted then the jordana is polemic. If something denazify the rosamund and the rosamund perceive the jordana then the jordana capsule the rosamund. If something capsule the rosamund then the rosamund capsule the jordana. If the jordana is corrupting then the jordana denazify the rosamund. If something capsule the jordana and it denazify the rosamund then it perceive the rosamund. If the jordana capsule the rosamund and the rosamund perceive the jordana then the rosamund capsule the jordana. If something perceive the jordana then the jordana is unmanly. The jordana does not like the rosamund.", "logic": "\nCorrupting(jordana)\nPerceive(rosamund, jordana)\nCapsule(rosamund, jordana) and Unmanly(rosamund) -> Denazify(rosamund, jordana)\nforall x (Denazify(x, jordana) and Unsorted(x) -> Polemic(jordana))\nforall x (Denazify(x, rosamund) and Perceive(rosamund, jordana) -> Capsule(jordana, rosamund))\nforall x (Capsule(x, rosamund) -> Capsule(rosamund, jordana))\nCorrupting(jordana) -> Denazify(jordana, rosamund)\nforall x (Capsule(x, jordana) and Denazify(x, rosamund) -> Perceive(x, rosamund))\nCapsule(jordana, rosamund) and Perceive(rosamund, jordana) -> Capsule(rosamund, jordana)\nforall x (Perceive(x, jordana) -> Unmanly(jordana))\n\nnot Denazify(jordana, rosamund)\n\nCorrupting(jordana) and Corrupting(jordana) -> Denazify(jordana, rosamund) -> therefore Denazify(jordana, rosamund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The deva is jolting. The kendal jaundice the deva. If the kendal root the deva and the kendal is purposeful then the kendal agnise the deva. If something agnise the deva and it is procumbent then the deva is surmisable. If something agnise the kendal and the kendal jaundice the deva then the deva root the kendal. If something root the kendal then the kendal root the deva. If the deva is jolting then the deva agnise the kendal. If something root the deva and it agnise the kendal then it jaundice the kendal. If the deva root the kendal and the kendal jaundice the deva then the kendal root the deva. If something jaundice the deva then the deva is purposeful. The deva root the kendal.", "logic": "\nJolting(deva)\nJaundice(kendal, deva)\nRoot(kendal, deva) and Purposeful(kendal) -> Agnise(kendal, deva)\nforall x (Agnise(x, deva) and Procumbent(x) -> Surmisable(deva))\nforall x (Agnise(x, kendal) and Jaundice(kendal, deva) -> Root(deva, kendal))\nforall x (Root(x, kendal) -> Root(kendal, deva))\nJolting(deva) -> Agnise(deva, kendal)\nforall x (Root(x, deva) and Agnise(x, kendal) -> Jaundice(x, kendal))\nRoot(deva, kendal) and Jaundice(kendal, deva) -> Root(kendal, deva)\nforall x (Jaundice(x, deva) -> Purposeful(deva))\n\nRoot(deva, kendal)\n\nJolting(deva) and Jolting(deva) -> Agnise(deva, kendal) -> therefore Agnise(deva, kendal) Agnise(deva, kendal) and Jaundice(kendal, deva) and forall x (Agnise(x, kendal) and Jaundice(kendal, deva) -> Root(deva, kendal)) -> therefore Root(deva, kendal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The marilu is coordinate. The rob cuckold the marilu. If the rob tenderize the marilu and the rob is partial then the rob paragraph the marilu. If something paragraph the marilu and it is improving then the marilu is reconciled. If something paragraph the rob and the rob cuckold the marilu then the marilu tenderize the rob. If something tenderize the rob then the rob tenderize the marilu. If the marilu is coordinate then the marilu paragraph the rob. If something tenderize the marilu and it paragraph the rob then it cuckold the rob. If the marilu tenderize the rob and the rob cuckold the marilu then the rob tenderize the marilu. If something cuckold the marilu then the marilu is partial. The marilu does not need the rob.", "logic": "\nCoordinate(marilu)\nCuckold(rob, marilu)\nTenderize(rob, marilu) and Partial(rob) -> Paragraph(rob, marilu)\nforall x (Paragraph(x, marilu) and Improving(x) -> Reconciled(marilu))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, rob) and Cuckold(rob, marilu) -> Tenderize(marilu, rob))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, rob) -> Tenderize(rob, marilu))\nCoordinate(marilu) -> Paragraph(marilu, rob)\nforall x (Tenderize(x, marilu) and Paragraph(x, rob) -> Cuckold(x, rob))\nTenderize(marilu, rob) and Cuckold(rob, marilu) -> Tenderize(rob, marilu)\nforall x (Cuckold(x, marilu) -> Partial(marilu))\n\nnot Tenderize(marilu, rob)\n\nCoordinate(marilu) and Coordinate(marilu) -> Paragraph(marilu, rob) -> therefore Paragraph(marilu, rob) Paragraph(marilu, rob) and Cuckold(rob, marilu) and forall x (Paragraph(x, rob) and Cuckold(rob, marilu) -> Tenderize(marilu, rob)) -> therefore Tenderize(marilu, rob)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The cammi is unexciting. The zora muddy the cammi. If the zora subtilize the cammi and the zora is unbaptized then the zora cater the cammi. If something cater the cammi and it is required then the cammi is playable. If something cater the zora and the zora muddy the cammi then the cammi subtilize the zora. If something subtilize the zora then the zora subtilize the cammi. If the cammi is unexciting then the cammi cater the zora. If something subtilize the cammi and it cater the zora then it muddy the zora. If the cammi subtilize the zora and the zora muddy the cammi then the zora subtilize the cammi. If something muddy the cammi then the cammi is unbaptized. The zora subtilize the cammi.", "logic": "\nUnexciting(cammi)\nMuddy(zora, cammi)\nSubtilize(zora, cammi) and Unbaptized(zora) -> Cater(zora, cammi)\nforall x (Cater(x, cammi) and Required(x) -> Playable(cammi))\nforall x (Cater(x, zora) and Muddy(zora, cammi) -> Subtilize(cammi, zora))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, zora) -> Subtilize(zora, cammi))\nUnexciting(cammi) -> Cater(cammi, zora)\nforall x (Subtilize(x, cammi) and Cater(x, zora) -> Muddy(x, zora))\nSubtilize(cammi, zora) and Muddy(zora, cammi) -> Subtilize(zora, cammi)\nforall x (Muddy(x, cammi) -> Unbaptized(cammi))\n\nSubtilize(zora, cammi)\n\nUnexciting(cammi) and Unexciting(cammi) -> Cater(cammi, zora) -> therefore Cater(cammi, zora) Cater(cammi, zora) and Muddy(zora, cammi) and forall x (Cater(x, zora) and Muddy(zora, cammi) -> Subtilize(cammi, zora)) -> therefore Subtilize(cammi, zora) Subtilize(cammi, zora) and forall x (Subtilize(x, zora) -> Subtilize(zora, cammi)) -> therefore Subtilize(zora, cammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The stern is orwellian. The wade tessellate the stern. If the wade sweeten the stern and the wade is uttermost then the wade spot the stern. If something spot the stern and it is exciting then the stern is untraveled. If something spot the wade and the wade tessellate the stern then the stern sweeten the wade. If something sweeten the wade then the wade sweeten the stern. If the stern is orwellian then the stern spot the wade. If something sweeten the stern and it spot the wade then it tessellate the wade. If the stern sweeten the wade and the wade tessellate the stern then the wade sweeten the stern. If something tessellate the stern then the stern is uttermost. The wade does not need the stern.", "logic": "\nOrwellian(stern)\nTessellate(wade, stern)\nSweeten(wade, stern) and Uttermost(wade) -> Spot(wade, stern)\nforall x (Spot(x, stern) and Exciting(x) -> Untraveled(stern))\nforall x (Spot(x, wade) and Tessellate(wade, stern) -> Sweeten(stern, wade))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, wade) -> Sweeten(wade, stern))\nOrwellian(stern) -> Spot(stern, wade)\nforall x (Sweeten(x, stern) and Spot(x, wade) -> Tessellate(x, wade))\nSweeten(stern, wade) and Tessellate(wade, stern) -> Sweeten(wade, stern)\nforall x (Tessellate(x, stern) -> Uttermost(stern))\n\nnot Sweeten(wade, stern)\n\nOrwellian(stern) and Orwellian(stern) -> Spot(stern, wade) -> therefore Spot(stern, wade) Spot(stern, wade) and Tessellate(wade, stern) and forall x (Spot(x, wade) and Tessellate(wade, stern) -> Sweeten(stern, wade)) -> therefore Sweeten(stern, wade) Sweeten(stern, wade) and forall x (Sweeten(x, wade) -> Sweeten(wade, stern)) -> therefore Sweeten(wade, stern)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The claudine is judgmental. The jessalin study the claudine. If the jessalin infuriate the claudine and the jessalin is queasy then the jessalin hustle the claudine. If something hustle the claudine and it is abnaki then the claudine is subdural. If something hustle the jessalin and the jessalin study the claudine then the claudine infuriate the jessalin. If something infuriate the jessalin then the jessalin infuriate the claudine. If the claudine is judgmental then the claudine hustle the jessalin. If something infuriate the claudine and it hustle the jessalin then it study the jessalin. If the claudine infuriate the jessalin and the jessalin study the claudine then the jessalin infuriate the claudine. If something study the claudine then the claudine is queasy. The claudine does not eat the jessalin.", "logic": "\nJudgmental(claudine)\nStudy(jessalin, claudine)\nInfuriate(jessalin, claudine) and Queasy(jessalin) -> Hustle(jessalin, claudine)\nforall x (Hustle(x, claudine) and Abnaki(x) -> Subdural(claudine))\nforall x (Hustle(x, jessalin) and Study(jessalin, claudine) -> Infuriate(claudine, jessalin))\nforall x (Infuriate(x, jessalin) -> Infuriate(jessalin, claudine))\nJudgmental(claudine) -> Hustle(claudine, jessalin)\nforall x (Infuriate(x, claudine) and Hustle(x, jessalin) -> Study(x, jessalin))\nInfuriate(claudine, jessalin) and Study(jessalin, claudine) -> Infuriate(jessalin, claudine)\nforall x (Study(x, claudine) -> Queasy(claudine))\n\nnot Study(claudine, jessalin)\n\nforall x (Infuriate(x, claudine) and Hustle(x, jessalin) -> Study(x, jessalin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The ozzie is polemic. The kaylee disk the ozzie. If the kaylee bouse the ozzie and the kaylee is rhombic then the kaylee scourge the ozzie. If something scourge the ozzie and it is acerate then the ozzie is garmented. If something scourge the kaylee and the kaylee disk the ozzie then the ozzie bouse the kaylee. If something bouse the kaylee then the kaylee bouse the ozzie. If the ozzie is polemic then the ozzie scourge the kaylee. If something bouse the ozzie and it scourge the kaylee then it disk the kaylee. If the ozzie bouse the kaylee and the kaylee disk the ozzie then the kaylee bouse the ozzie. If something disk the ozzie then the ozzie is rhombic. The kaylee disk the kaylee.", "logic": "\nPolemic(ozzie)\nDisk(kaylee, ozzie)\nBouse(kaylee, ozzie) and Rhombic(kaylee) -> Scourge(kaylee, ozzie)\nforall x (Scourge(x, ozzie) and Acerate(x) -> Garmented(ozzie))\nforall x (Scourge(x, kaylee) and Disk(kaylee, ozzie) -> Bouse(ozzie, kaylee))\nforall x (Bouse(x, kaylee) -> Bouse(kaylee, ozzie))\nPolemic(ozzie) -> Scourge(ozzie, kaylee)\nforall x (Bouse(x, ozzie) and Scourge(x, kaylee) -> Disk(x, kaylee))\nBouse(ozzie, kaylee) and Disk(kaylee, ozzie) -> Bouse(kaylee, ozzie)\nforall x (Disk(x, ozzie) -> Rhombic(ozzie))\n\nDisk(kaylee, kaylee)\n\nforall x (Bouse(x, ozzie) and Scourge(x, kaylee) -> Disk(x, kaylee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The tania is hokey. The ignacio unseal the tania. If the ignacio whicker the tania and the ignacio is sweptwing then the ignacio descant the tania. If something descant the tania and it is fearsome then the tania is inbred. If something descant the ignacio and the ignacio unseal the tania then the tania whicker the ignacio. If something whicker the ignacio then the ignacio whicker the tania. If the tania is hokey then the tania descant the ignacio. If something whicker the tania and it descant the ignacio then it unseal the ignacio. If the tania whicker the ignacio and the ignacio unseal the tania then the ignacio whicker the tania. If something unseal the tania then the tania is sweptwing. The ignacio does not like the tania.", "logic": "\nHokey(tania)\nUnseal(ignacio, tania)\nWhicker(ignacio, tania) and Sweptwing(ignacio) -> Descant(ignacio, tania)\nforall x (Descant(x, tania) and Fearsome(x) -> Inbred(tania))\nforall x (Descant(x, ignacio) and Unseal(ignacio, tania) -> Whicker(tania, ignacio))\nforall x (Whicker(x, ignacio) -> Whicker(ignacio, tania))\nHokey(tania) -> Descant(tania, ignacio)\nforall x (Whicker(x, tania) and Descant(x, ignacio) -> Unseal(x, ignacio))\nWhicker(tania, ignacio) and Unseal(ignacio, tania) -> Whicker(ignacio, tania)\nforall x (Unseal(x, tania) -> Sweptwing(tania))\n\nnot Descant(ignacio, tania)\n\nWhicker(ignacio, tania) and Sweptwing(ignacio) -> Descant(ignacio, tania) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The corky is painted. The candie resell the corky. If the candie moulder the corky and the candie is exact then the candie funnel the corky. If something funnel the corky and it is ceylonese then the corky is solomonic. If something funnel the candie and the candie resell the corky then the corky moulder the candie. If something moulder the candie then the candie moulder the corky. If the corky is painted then the corky funnel the candie. If something moulder the corky and it funnel the candie then it resell the candie. If the corky moulder the candie and the candie resell the corky then the candie moulder the corky. If something resell the corky then the corky is exact. The corky is solomonic.", "logic": "\nPainted(corky)\nResell(candie, corky)\nMoulder(candie, corky) and Exact(candie) -> Funnel(candie, corky)\nforall x (Funnel(x, corky) and Ceylonese(x) -> Solomonic(corky))\nforall x (Funnel(x, candie) and Resell(candie, corky) -> Moulder(corky, candie))\nforall x (Moulder(x, candie) -> Moulder(candie, corky))\nPainted(corky) -> Funnel(corky, candie)\nforall x (Moulder(x, corky) and Funnel(x, candie) -> Resell(x, candie))\nMoulder(corky, candie) and Resell(candie, corky) -> Moulder(candie, corky)\nforall x (Resell(x, corky) -> Exact(corky))\n\nSolomonic(corky)\n\nforall x (Funnel(x, corky) and Ceylonese(x) -> Solomonic(corky)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The mickie is bilabial. The jessy manducate the mickie. If the jessy reinstall the mickie and the jessy is sickish then the jessy outgrow the mickie. If something outgrow the mickie and it is foetal then the mickie is deboned. If something outgrow the jessy and the jessy manducate the mickie then the mickie reinstall the jessy. If something reinstall the jessy then the jessy reinstall the mickie. If the mickie is bilabial then the mickie outgrow the jessy. If something reinstall the mickie and it outgrow the jessy then it manducate the jessy. If the mickie reinstall the jessy and the jessy manducate the mickie then the jessy reinstall the mickie. If something manducate the mickie then the mickie is sickish. The jessy is not sickish.", "logic": "\nBilabial(mickie)\nManducate(jessy, mickie)\nReinstall(jessy, mickie) and Sickish(jessy) -> Outgrow(jessy, mickie)\nforall x (Outgrow(x, mickie) and Foetal(x) -> Deboned(mickie))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, jessy) and Manducate(jessy, mickie) -> Reinstall(mickie, jessy))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, jessy) -> Reinstall(jessy, mickie))\nBilabial(mickie) -> Outgrow(mickie, jessy)\nforall x (Reinstall(x, mickie) and Outgrow(x, jessy) -> Manducate(x, jessy))\nReinstall(mickie, jessy) and Manducate(jessy, mickie) -> Reinstall(jessy, mickie)\nforall x (Manducate(x, mickie) -> Sickish(mickie))\n\nnot Sickish(jessy)\n\nnot Sickish(jessy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The hortensia is intolerant. The cloe shamanise the hortensia. If the cloe bestow the hortensia and the cloe is mandatory then the cloe telephone the hortensia. If something telephone the hortensia and it is amblyopic then the hortensia is wisplike. If something telephone the cloe and the cloe shamanise the hortensia then the hortensia bestow the cloe. If something bestow the cloe then the cloe bestow the hortensia. If the hortensia is intolerant then the hortensia telephone the cloe. If something bestow the hortensia and it telephone the cloe then it shamanise the cloe. If the hortensia bestow the cloe and the cloe shamanise the hortensia then the cloe bestow the hortensia. If something shamanise the hortensia then the hortensia is mandatory. The hortensia is nice.", "logic": "\nIntolerant(hortensia)\nShamanise(cloe, hortensia)\nBestow(cloe, hortensia) and Mandatory(cloe) -> Telephone(cloe, hortensia)\nforall x (Telephone(x, hortensia) and Amblyopic(x) -> Wisplike(hortensia))\nforall x (Telephone(x, cloe) and Shamanise(cloe, hortensia) -> Bestow(hortensia, cloe))\nforall x (Bestow(x, cloe) -> Bestow(cloe, hortensia))\nIntolerant(hortensia) -> Telephone(hortensia, cloe)\nforall x (Bestow(x, hortensia) and Telephone(x, cloe) -> Shamanise(x, cloe))\nBestow(hortensia, cloe) and Shamanise(cloe, hortensia) -> Bestow(cloe, hortensia)\nforall x (Shamanise(x, hortensia) -> Mandatory(hortensia))\n\nNice(hortensia)\n\nNice(hortensia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The tamarra is portentous. The hermy thermostat the tamarra. If the hermy lend the tamarra and the hermy is laden then the hermy preside the tamarra. If something preside the tamarra and it is unploughed then the tamarra is spoiled. If something preside the hermy and the hermy thermostat the tamarra then the tamarra lend the hermy. If something lend the hermy then the hermy lend the tamarra. If the tamarra is portentous then the tamarra preside the hermy. If something lend the tamarra and it preside the hermy then it thermostat the hermy. If the tamarra lend the hermy and the hermy thermostat the tamarra then the hermy lend the tamarra. If something thermostat the tamarra then the tamarra is laden. The tamarra does not need the tamarra.", "logic": "\nPortentous(tamarra)\nThermostat(hermy, tamarra)\nLend(hermy, tamarra) and Laden(hermy) -> Preside(hermy, tamarra)\nforall x (Preside(x, tamarra) and Unploughed(x) -> Spoiled(tamarra))\nforall x (Preside(x, hermy) and Thermostat(hermy, tamarra) -> Lend(tamarra, hermy))\nforall x (Lend(x, hermy) -> Lend(hermy, tamarra))\nPortentous(tamarra) -> Preside(tamarra, hermy)\nforall x (Lend(x, tamarra) and Preside(x, hermy) -> Thermostat(x, hermy))\nLend(tamarra, hermy) and Thermostat(hermy, tamarra) -> Lend(hermy, tamarra)\nforall x (Thermostat(x, tamarra) -> Laden(tamarra))\n\nnot Lend(tamarra, tamarra)\n\nnot Lend(tamarra, tamarra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The wynne is boss. The sarene scavenge the wynne. If the sarene hotfoot the wynne and the sarene is versed then the sarene patinise the wynne. If something patinise the wynne and it is inner then the wynne is purplish. If something patinise the sarene and the sarene scavenge the wynne then the wynne hotfoot the sarene. If something hotfoot the sarene then the sarene hotfoot the wynne. If the wynne is boss then the wynne patinise the sarene. If something hotfoot the wynne and it patinise the sarene then it scavenge the sarene. If the wynne hotfoot the sarene and the sarene scavenge the wynne then the sarene hotfoot the wynne. If something scavenge the wynne then the wynne is versed. The sarene is nice.", "logic": "\nBoss(wynne)\nScavenge(sarene, wynne)\nHotfoot(sarene, wynne) and Versed(sarene) -> Patinise(sarene, wynne)\nforall x (Patinise(x, wynne) and Inner(x) -> Purplish(wynne))\nforall x (Patinise(x, sarene) and Scavenge(sarene, wynne) -> Hotfoot(wynne, sarene))\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, sarene) -> Hotfoot(sarene, wynne))\nBoss(wynne) -> Patinise(wynne, sarene)\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, wynne) and Patinise(x, sarene) -> Scavenge(x, sarene))\nHotfoot(wynne, sarene) and Scavenge(sarene, wynne) -> Hotfoot(sarene, wynne)\nforall x (Scavenge(x, wynne) -> Versed(wynne))\n\nNice(sarene)\n\nNice(sarene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The kelcey suds the florie. The florie suds the kelcey. If something renegade the florie and the florie suds the kelcey then it is chalky. All lucent things are chalky. If something renegade the florie then it renegade the kelcey. If something scum the kelcey then the kelcey scum the florie. If the florie is chalky then the florie renegade the kelcey. If something renegade the florie then it scum the kelcey. If something suds the kelcey then it renegade the florie. If something is hittite and it scum the kelcey then the kelcey suds the florie. The florie suds the kelcey.", "logic": "\nSuds(kelcey, florie)\nSuds(florie, kelcey)\nforall x (Renegade(x, florie) and Suds(florie, kelcey) -> Chalky(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Chalky(x))\nforall x (Renegade(x, florie) -> Renegade(x, kelcey))\nforall x (Scum(x, kelcey) -> Scum(kelcey, florie))\nChalky(florie) -> Renegade(florie, kelcey)\nforall x (Renegade(x, florie) -> Scum(x, kelcey))\nforall x (Suds(x, kelcey) -> Renegade(x, florie))\nforall x (Hittite(x) and Scum(x, kelcey) -> Suds(kelcey, florie))\n\nSuds(florie, kelcey)\n\ntherefore Suds(florie, kelcey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The fredra convect the heda. The heda convect the fredra. If something iodise the heda and the heda convect the fredra then it is dull. All tympanitic things are dull. If something iodise the heda then it iodise the fredra. If something bound the fredra then the fredra bound the heda. If the heda is dull then the heda iodise the fredra. If something iodise the heda then it bound the fredra. If something convect the fredra then it iodise the heda. If something is mensural and it bound the fredra then the fredra convect the heda. The fredra does not see the heda.", "logic": "\nConvect(fredra, heda)\nConvect(heda, fredra)\nforall x (Iodise(x, heda) and Convect(heda, fredra) -> Dull(x))\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Dull(x))\nforall x (Iodise(x, heda) -> Iodise(x, fredra))\nforall x (Bound(x, fredra) -> Bound(fredra, heda))\nDull(heda) -> Iodise(heda, fredra)\nforall x (Iodise(x, heda) -> Bound(x, fredra))\nforall x (Convect(x, fredra) -> Iodise(x, heda))\nforall x (Mensural(x) and Bound(x, fredra) -> Convect(fredra, heda))\n\nnot Convect(fredra, heda)\n\ntherefore Convect(fredra, heda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The oralia anticipate the liorah. The liorah anticipate the oralia. If something reawaken the liorah and the liorah anticipate the oralia then it is rested. All amendatory things are rested. If something reawaken the liorah then it reawaken the oralia. If something firm the oralia then the oralia firm the liorah. If the liorah is rested then the liorah reawaken the oralia. If something reawaken the liorah then it firm the oralia. If something anticipate the oralia then it reawaken the liorah. If something is mazed and it firm the oralia then the oralia anticipate the liorah. The liorah reawaken the liorah.", "logic": "\nAnticipate(oralia, liorah)\nAnticipate(liorah, oralia)\nforall x (Reawaken(x, liorah) and Anticipate(liorah, oralia) -> Rested(x))\nforall x (Amendatory(x) -> Rested(x))\nforall x (Reawaken(x, liorah) -> Reawaken(x, oralia))\nforall x (Firm(x, oralia) -> Firm(oralia, liorah))\nRested(liorah) -> Reawaken(liorah, oralia)\nforall x (Reawaken(x, liorah) -> Firm(x, oralia))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, oralia) -> Reawaken(x, liorah))\nforall x (Mazed(x) and Firm(x, oralia) -> Anticipate(oralia, liorah))\n\nReawaken(liorah, liorah)\n\nAnticipate(liorah, oralia) and forall x (Anticipate(x, oralia) -> Reawaken(x, liorah)) -> therefore Reawaken(liorah, liorah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The del unearth the mellicent. The mellicent unearth the del. If something defang the mellicent and the mellicent unearth the del then it is insincere. All fantastic things are insincere. If something defang the mellicent then it defang the del. If something stripe the del then the del stripe the mellicent. If the mellicent is insincere then the mellicent defang the del. If something defang the mellicent then it stripe the del. If something unearth the del then it defang the mellicent. If something is hypnotic and it stripe the del then the del unearth the mellicent. The mellicent does not chase the mellicent.", "logic": "\nUnearth(del, mellicent)\nUnearth(mellicent, del)\nforall x (Defang(x, mellicent) and Unearth(mellicent, del) -> Insincere(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) -> Insincere(x))\nforall x (Defang(x, mellicent) -> Defang(x, del))\nforall x (Stripe(x, del) -> Stripe(del, mellicent))\nInsincere(mellicent) -> Defang(mellicent, del)\nforall x (Defang(x, mellicent) -> Stripe(x, del))\nforall x (Unearth(x, del) -> Defang(x, mellicent))\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) and Stripe(x, del) -> Unearth(del, mellicent))\n\nnot Defang(mellicent, mellicent)\n\nUnearth(mellicent, del) and forall x (Unearth(x, del) -> Defang(x, mellicent)) -> therefore Defang(mellicent, mellicent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The weidar sideline the aigneis. The aigneis sideline the weidar. If something overprint the aigneis and the aigneis sideline the weidar then it is bengali. All learned things are bengali. If something overprint the aigneis then it overprint the weidar. If something foreground the weidar then the weidar foreground the aigneis. If the aigneis is bengali then the aigneis overprint the weidar. If something overprint the aigneis then it foreground the weidar. If something sideline the weidar then it overprint the aigneis. If something is nonrandom and it foreground the weidar then the weidar sideline the aigneis. The aigneis overprint the weidar.", "logic": "\nSideline(weidar, aigneis)\nSideline(aigneis, weidar)\nforall x (Overprint(x, aigneis) and Sideline(aigneis, weidar) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Learned(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Overprint(x, aigneis) -> Overprint(x, weidar))\nforall x (Foreground(x, weidar) -> Foreground(weidar, aigneis))\nBengali(aigneis) -> Overprint(aigneis, weidar)\nforall x (Overprint(x, aigneis) -> Foreground(x, weidar))\nforall x (Sideline(x, weidar) -> Overprint(x, aigneis))\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and Foreground(x, weidar) -> Sideline(weidar, aigneis))\n\nOverprint(aigneis, weidar)\n\nSideline(aigneis, weidar) and forall x (Sideline(x, weidar) -> Overprint(x, aigneis)) -> therefore Overprint(aigneis, aigneis) Overprint(aigneis, aigneis) and forall x (Overprint(x, aigneis) -> Overprint(x, weidar)) -> therefore Overprint(aigneis, weidar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The ros strand the tadeas. The tadeas strand the ros. If something motorcycle the tadeas and the tadeas strand the ros then it is deltoid. All nominative things are deltoid. If something motorcycle the tadeas then it motorcycle the ros. If something file the ros then the ros file the tadeas. If the tadeas is deltoid then the tadeas motorcycle the ros. If something motorcycle the tadeas then it file the ros. If something strand the ros then it motorcycle the tadeas. If something is warm and it file the ros then the ros strand the tadeas. The tadeas does not chase the ros.", "logic": "\nStrand(ros, tadeas)\nStrand(tadeas, ros)\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, tadeas) and Strand(tadeas, ros) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Nominative(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, tadeas) -> Motorcycle(x, ros))\nforall x (File(x, ros) -> File(ros, tadeas))\nDeltoid(tadeas) -> Motorcycle(tadeas, ros)\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, tadeas) -> File(x, ros))\nforall x (Strand(x, ros) -> Motorcycle(x, tadeas))\nforall x (Warm(x) and File(x, ros) -> Strand(ros, tadeas))\n\nnot Motorcycle(tadeas, ros)\n\nStrand(tadeas, ros) and forall x (Strand(x, ros) -> Motorcycle(x, tadeas)) -> therefore Motorcycle(tadeas, tadeas) Motorcycle(tadeas, tadeas) and forall x (Motorcycle(x, tadeas) -> Motorcycle(x, ros)) -> therefore Motorcycle(tadeas, ros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The jessika dishonor the leslie. The leslie dishonor the jessika. If something zone the leslie and the leslie dishonor the jessika then it is peaceful. All mean things are peaceful. If something zone the leslie then it zone the jessika. If something caseate the jessika then the jessika caseate the leslie. If the leslie is peaceful then the leslie zone the jessika. If something zone the leslie then it caseate the jessika. If something dishonor the jessika then it zone the leslie. If something is chummy and it caseate the jessika then the jessika dishonor the leslie. The jessika caseate the leslie.", "logic": "\nDishonor(jessika, leslie)\nDishonor(leslie, jessika)\nforall x (Zone(x, leslie) and Dishonor(leslie, jessika) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Mean(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Zone(x, leslie) -> Zone(x, jessika))\nforall x (Caseate(x, jessika) -> Caseate(jessika, leslie))\nPeaceful(leslie) -> Zone(leslie, jessika)\nforall x (Zone(x, leslie) -> Caseate(x, jessika))\nforall x (Dishonor(x, jessika) -> Zone(x, leslie))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and Caseate(x, jessika) -> Dishonor(jessika, leslie))\n\nCaseate(jessika, leslie)\n\nDishonor(leslie, jessika) and forall x (Dishonor(x, jessika) -> Zone(x, leslie)) -> therefore Zone(leslie, leslie) Zone(leslie, leslie) and forall x (Zone(x, leslie) -> Caseate(x, jessika)) -> therefore Caseate(leslie, jessika) Caseate(leslie, jessika) and forall x (Caseate(x, jessika) -> Caseate(jessika, leslie)) -> therefore Caseate(jessika, leslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The dahlia condescend the marlee. The marlee condescend the dahlia. If something secede the marlee and the marlee condescend the dahlia then it is well. All resolute things are well. If something secede the marlee then it secede the dahlia. If something await the dahlia then the dahlia await the marlee. If the marlee is well then the marlee secede the dahlia. If something secede the marlee then it await the dahlia. If something condescend the dahlia then it secede the marlee. If something is demode and it await the dahlia then the dahlia condescend the marlee. The dahlia does not visit the marlee.", "logic": "\nCondescend(dahlia, marlee)\nCondescend(marlee, dahlia)\nforall x (Secede(x, marlee) and Condescend(marlee, dahlia) -> Well(x))\nforall x (Resolute(x) -> Well(x))\nforall x (Secede(x, marlee) -> Secede(x, dahlia))\nforall x (Await(x, dahlia) -> Await(dahlia, marlee))\nWell(marlee) -> Secede(marlee, dahlia)\nforall x (Secede(x, marlee) -> Await(x, dahlia))\nforall x (Condescend(x, dahlia) -> Secede(x, marlee))\nforall x (Demode(x) and Await(x, dahlia) -> Condescend(dahlia, marlee))\n\nnot Await(dahlia, marlee)\n\nCondescend(marlee, dahlia) and forall x (Condescend(x, dahlia) -> Secede(x, marlee)) -> therefore Secede(marlee, marlee) Secede(marlee, marlee) and forall x (Secede(x, marlee) -> Await(x, dahlia)) -> therefore Await(marlee, dahlia) Await(marlee, dahlia) and forall x (Await(x, dahlia) -> Await(dahlia, marlee)) -> therefore Await(dahlia, marlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The nickie slash the arleen. The arleen slash the nickie. If something stonewash the arleen and the arleen slash the nickie then it is hearable. All cured things are hearable. If something stonewash the arleen then it stonewash the nickie. If something gimp the nickie then the nickie gimp the arleen. If the arleen is hearable then the arleen stonewash the nickie. If something stonewash the arleen then it gimp the nickie. If something slash the nickie then it stonewash the arleen. If something is weekly and it gimp the nickie then the nickie slash the arleen. The nickie does not chase the nickie.", "logic": "\nSlash(nickie, arleen)\nSlash(arleen, nickie)\nforall x (Stonewash(x, arleen) and Slash(arleen, nickie) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Stonewash(x, arleen) -> Stonewash(x, nickie))\nforall x (Gimp(x, nickie) -> Gimp(nickie, arleen))\nHearable(arleen) -> Stonewash(arleen, nickie)\nforall x (Stonewash(x, arleen) -> Gimp(x, nickie))\nforall x (Slash(x, nickie) -> Stonewash(x, arleen))\nforall x (Weekly(x) and Gimp(x, nickie) -> Slash(nickie, arleen))\n\nnot Stonewash(nickie, nickie)\n\nforall x (Stonewash(x, arleen) -> Stonewash(x, nickie)) <- forall x (Slash(x, nickie) -> Stonewash(x, arleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The marla currycomb the ardis. The ardis currycomb the marla. If something begrime the ardis and the ardis currycomb the marla then it is leaky. All speechless things are leaky. If something begrime the ardis then it begrime the marla. If something blether the marla then the marla blether the ardis. If the ardis is leaky then the ardis begrime the marla. If something begrime the ardis then it blether the marla. If something currycomb the marla then it begrime the ardis. If something is lazy and it blether the marla then the marla currycomb the ardis. The marla is leaky.", "logic": "\nCurrycomb(marla, ardis)\nCurrycomb(ardis, marla)\nforall x (Begrime(x, ardis) and Currycomb(ardis, marla) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Begrime(x, ardis) -> Begrime(x, marla))\nforall x (Blether(x, marla) -> Blether(marla, ardis))\nLeaky(ardis) -> Begrime(ardis, marla)\nforall x (Begrime(x, ardis) -> Blether(x, marla))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, marla) -> Begrime(x, ardis))\nforall x (Lazy(x) and Blether(x, marla) -> Currycomb(marla, ardis))\n\nLeaky(marla)\n\nforall x (Begrime(x, ardis) and Currycomb(ardis, marla) -> Leaky(x)) <- forall x (Currycomb(x, marla) -> Begrime(x, ardis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The morganica dizzy the kendre. The kendre dizzy the morganica. If something arbitrate the kendre and the kendre dizzy the morganica then it is optative. All squat things are optative. If something arbitrate the kendre then it arbitrate the morganica. If something machinate the morganica then the morganica machinate the kendre. If the kendre is optative then the kendre arbitrate the morganica. If something arbitrate the kendre then it machinate the morganica. If something dizzy the morganica then it arbitrate the kendre. If something is fanned and it machinate the morganica then the morganica dizzy the kendre. The morganica does not chase the kendre.", "logic": "\nDizzy(morganica, kendre)\nDizzy(kendre, morganica)\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, kendre) and Dizzy(kendre, morganica) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Squat(x) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, kendre) -> Arbitrate(x, morganica))\nforall x (Machinate(x, morganica) -> Machinate(morganica, kendre))\nOptative(kendre) -> Arbitrate(kendre, morganica)\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, kendre) -> Machinate(x, morganica))\nforall x (Dizzy(x, morganica) -> Arbitrate(x, kendre))\nforall x (Fanned(x) and Machinate(x, morganica) -> Dizzy(morganica, kendre))\n\nnot Arbitrate(morganica, kendre)\n\nforall x (Dizzy(x, morganica) -> Arbitrate(x, kendre)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The hugo execute the addie. The addie execute the hugo. If something pencil the addie and the addie execute the hugo then it is jingoistic. All eighteen things are jingoistic. If something pencil the addie then it pencil the hugo. If something ticktack the hugo then the hugo ticktack the addie. If the addie is jingoistic then the addie pencil the hugo. If something pencil the addie then it ticktack the hugo. If something execute the hugo then it pencil the addie. If something is tiny and it ticktack the hugo then the hugo execute the addie. The hugo ticktack the hugo.", "logic": "\nExecute(hugo, addie)\nExecute(addie, hugo)\nforall x (Pencil(x, addie) and Execute(addie, hugo) -> Jingoistic(x))\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nforall x (Pencil(x, addie) -> Pencil(x, hugo))\nforall x (Ticktack(x, hugo) -> Ticktack(hugo, addie))\nJingoistic(addie) -> Pencil(addie, hugo)\nforall x (Pencil(x, addie) -> Ticktack(x, hugo))\nforall x (Execute(x, hugo) -> Pencil(x, addie))\nforall x (Tiny(x) and Ticktack(x, hugo) -> Execute(hugo, addie))\n\nTicktack(hugo, hugo)\n\nforall x (Pencil(x, addie) -> Ticktack(x, hugo)) <- forall x (Execute(x, hugo) -> Pencil(x, addie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The alida reshape the breena. The breena reshape the alida. If something instrument the breena and the breena reshape the alida then it is sainted. All indolent things are sainted. If something instrument the breena then it instrument the alida. If something dissertate the alida then the alida dissertate the breena. If the breena is sainted then the breena instrument the alida. If something instrument the breena then it dissertate the alida. If something reshape the alida then it instrument the breena. If something is waste and it dissertate the alida then the alida reshape the breena. The breena is not waste.", "logic": "\nReshape(alida, breena)\nReshape(breena, alida)\nforall x (Instrument(x, breena) and Reshape(breena, alida) -> Sainted(x))\nforall x (Indolent(x) -> Sainted(x))\nforall x (Instrument(x, breena) -> Instrument(x, alida))\nforall x (Dissertate(x, alida) -> Dissertate(alida, breena))\nSainted(breena) -> Instrument(breena, alida)\nforall x (Instrument(x, breena) -> Dissertate(x, alida))\nforall x (Reshape(x, alida) -> Instrument(x, breena))\nforall x (Waste(x) and Dissertate(x, alida) -> Reshape(alida, breena))\n\nnot Waste(breena)\n\nnot Waste(breena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The stafford prejudge the russell. The russell prejudge the stafford. If something abbreviate the russell and the russell prejudge the stafford then it is randomized. All discursive things are randomized. If something abbreviate the russell then it abbreviate the stafford. If something gray the stafford then the stafford gray the russell. If the russell is randomized then the russell abbreviate the stafford. If something abbreviate the russell then it gray the stafford. If something prejudge the stafford then it abbreviate the russell. If something is pistillate and it gray the stafford then the stafford prejudge the russell. The russell gray the russell.", "logic": "\nPrejudge(stafford, russell)\nPrejudge(russell, stafford)\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, russell) and Prejudge(russell, stafford) -> Randomized(x))\nforall x (Discursive(x) -> Randomized(x))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, russell) -> Abbreviate(x, stafford))\nforall x (Gray(x, stafford) -> Gray(stafford, russell))\nRandomized(russell) -> Abbreviate(russell, stafford)\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, russell) -> Gray(x, stafford))\nforall x (Prejudge(x, stafford) -> Abbreviate(x, russell))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) and Gray(x, stafford) -> Prejudge(stafford, russell))\n\nGray(russell, russell)\n\nGray(russell, russell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The kane detrain the giorgi. The giorgi detrain the kane. If something catch the giorgi and the giorgi detrain the kane then it is palliative. All obligate things are palliative. If something catch the giorgi then it catch the kane. If something slaughter the kane then the kane slaughter the giorgi. If the giorgi is palliative then the giorgi catch the kane. If something catch the giorgi then it slaughter the kane. If something detrain the kane then it catch the giorgi. If something is projectile and it slaughter the kane then the kane detrain the giorgi. The giorgi is not big.", "logic": "\nDetrain(kane, giorgi)\nDetrain(giorgi, kane)\nforall x (Catch(x, giorgi) and Detrain(giorgi, kane) -> Palliative(x))\nforall x (Obligate(x) -> Palliative(x))\nforall x (Catch(x, giorgi) -> Catch(x, kane))\nforall x (Slaughter(x, kane) -> Slaughter(kane, giorgi))\nPalliative(giorgi) -> Catch(giorgi, kane)\nforall x (Catch(x, giorgi) -> Slaughter(x, kane))\nforall x (Detrain(x, kane) -> Catch(x, giorgi))\nforall x (Projectile(x) and Slaughter(x, kane) -> Detrain(kane, giorgi))\n\nnot Big(giorgi)\n\nnot Big(giorgi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The ginger puzzle the hilliard. The hilliard puzzle the ginger. If something berry the hilliard and the hilliard puzzle the ginger then it is swagger. All haired things are swagger. If something berry the hilliard then it berry the ginger. If something abhor the ginger then the ginger abhor the hilliard. If the hilliard is swagger then the hilliard berry the ginger. If something berry the hilliard then it abhor the ginger. If something puzzle the ginger then it berry the hilliard. If something is ungentle and it abhor the ginger then the ginger puzzle the hilliard. The hilliard is cold.", "logic": "\nPuzzle(ginger, hilliard)\nPuzzle(hilliard, ginger)\nforall x (Berry(x, hilliard) and Puzzle(hilliard, ginger) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (Haired(x) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (Berry(x, hilliard) -> Berry(x, ginger))\nforall x (Abhor(x, ginger) -> Abhor(ginger, hilliard))\nSwagger(hilliard) -> Berry(hilliard, ginger)\nforall x (Berry(x, hilliard) -> Abhor(x, ginger))\nforall x (Puzzle(x, ginger) -> Berry(x, hilliard))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) and Abhor(x, ginger) -> Puzzle(ginger, hilliard))\n\nCold(hilliard)\n\nCold(hilliard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "Taddeus is vivace. Rodolphe is not adamantine. Big things are canned. Young things are xxxvii. If something is canned and adamantine then it is xxxvii. If something is iranian and not vivace then it is yummy. If something is adamantine then it is yummy. If something is canned and not vivace then it is adamantine. If something is xxxvii and vivace then it is iranian. If Rodolphe is vivace and Rodolphe is not iranian then Rodolphe is not yummy. Rodolphe is not adamantine.", "logic": "\nVivace(taddeus)\nnot Adamantine(rodolphe)\nforall x (Iranian(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Vivace(x) -> Xxxvii(x))\nforall x (Canned(x) and Adamantine(x) -> Xxxvii(x))\nforall x (Iranian(x) and not Vivace(x) -> Yummy(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Yummy(x))\nforall x (Canned(x) and not Vivace(x) -> Adamantine(x))\nforall x (Xxxvii(x) and Vivace(x) -> Iranian(x))\nVivace(rodolphe) and not Iranian(rodolphe) -> not Yummy(rodolphe)\n\nnot Adamantine(rodolphe)\n\ntherefore not Adamantine(rodolphe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Wilbert is sisterly. Elana is not elfish. Big things are exclusive. Young things are sapiential. If something is exclusive and elfish then it is sapiential. If something is palmy and not sisterly then it is unwearied. If something is elfish then it is unwearied. If something is exclusive and not sisterly then it is elfish. If something is sapiential and sisterly then it is palmy. If Elana is sisterly and Elana is not palmy then Elana is not unwearied. Elana is elfish.", "logic": "\nSisterly(wilbert)\nnot Elfish(elana)\nforall x (Palmy(x) -> Exclusive(x))\nforall x (Sisterly(x) -> Sapiential(x))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) and Elfish(x) -> Sapiential(x))\nforall x (Palmy(x) and not Sisterly(x) -> Unwearied(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) -> Unwearied(x))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) and not Sisterly(x) -> Elfish(x))\nforall x (Sapiential(x) and Sisterly(x) -> Palmy(x))\nSisterly(elana) and not Palmy(elana) -> not Unwearied(elana)\n\nElfish(elana)\n\ntherefore not Elfish(elana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Bernete is hexed. Mattheus is not albinic. Big things are repeatable. Young things are christly. If something is repeatable and albinic then it is christly. If something is different and not hexed then it is drowsing. If something is albinic then it is drowsing. If something is repeatable and not hexed then it is albinic. If something is christly and hexed then it is different. If Mattheus is hexed and Mattheus is not different then Mattheus is not drowsing. Bernete is christly.", "logic": "\nHexed(bernete)\nnot Albinic(mattheus)\nforall x (Different(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Hexed(x) -> Christly(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) and Albinic(x) -> Christly(x))\nforall x (Different(x) and not Hexed(x) -> Drowsing(x))\nforall x (Albinic(x) -> Drowsing(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) and not Hexed(x) -> Albinic(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) and Hexed(x) -> Different(x))\nHexed(mattheus) and not Different(mattheus) -> not Drowsing(mattheus)\n\nChristly(bernete)\n\nHexed(bernete) and forall x (Hexed(x) -> Christly(x)) -> therefore Christly(bernete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Felicdad is unmerited. Jacynth is not genetic. Big things are floored. Young things are pervious. If something is floored and genetic then it is pervious. If something is coenobitic and not unmerited then it is useless. If something is genetic then it is useless. If something is floored and not unmerited then it is genetic. If something is pervious and unmerited then it is coenobitic. If Jacynth is unmerited and Jacynth is not coenobitic then Jacynth is not useless. Felicdad is not pervious.", "logic": "\nUnmerited(felicdad)\nnot Genetic(jacynth)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Floored(x))\nforall x (Unmerited(x) -> Pervious(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) and Genetic(x) -> Pervious(x))\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) and not Unmerited(x) -> Useless(x))\nforall x (Genetic(x) -> Useless(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) and not Unmerited(x) -> Genetic(x))\nforall x (Pervious(x) and Unmerited(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nUnmerited(jacynth) and not Coenobitic(jacynth) -> not Useless(jacynth)\n\nnot Pervious(felicdad)\n\nUnmerited(felicdad) and forall x (Unmerited(x) -> Pervious(x)) -> therefore Pervious(felicdad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Dwight is ceylonese. Lana is not lowborn. Big things are vindictive. Young things are avid. If something is vindictive and lowborn then it is avid. If something is buttoned and not ceylonese then it is onymous. If something is lowborn then it is onymous. If something is vindictive and not ceylonese then it is lowborn. If something is avid and ceylonese then it is buttoned. If Lana is ceylonese and Lana is not buttoned then Lana is not onymous. Dwight is buttoned.", "logic": "\nCeylonese(dwight)\nnot Lowborn(lana)\nforall x (Buttoned(x) -> Vindictive(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Vindictive(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Buttoned(x) and not Ceylonese(x) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Vindictive(x) and not Ceylonese(x) -> Lowborn(x))\nforall x (Avid(x) and Ceylonese(x) -> Buttoned(x))\nCeylonese(lana) and not Buttoned(lana) -> not Onymous(lana)\n\nButtoned(dwight)\n\nCeylonese(dwight) and forall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Avid(x)) -> therefore Avid(dwight) Avid(dwight) and Ceylonese(dwight) and forall x (Avid(x) and Ceylonese(x) -> Buttoned(x)) -> therefore Buttoned(dwight)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Berna is unfaithful. Kaylyn is not viatical. Big things are limacine. Young things are awful. If something is limacine and viatical then it is awful. If something is lincolnian and not unfaithful then it is facetious. If something is viatical then it is facetious. If something is limacine and not unfaithful then it is viatical. If something is awful and unfaithful then it is lincolnian. If Kaylyn is unfaithful and Kaylyn is not lincolnian then Kaylyn is not facetious. Berna is not lincolnian.", "logic": "\nUnfaithful(berna)\nnot Viatical(kaylyn)\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Limacine(x))\nforall x (Unfaithful(x) -> Awful(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Viatical(x) -> Awful(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) and not Unfaithful(x) -> Facetious(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) -> Facetious(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and not Unfaithful(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Awful(x) and Unfaithful(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nUnfaithful(kaylyn) and not Lincolnian(kaylyn) -> not Facetious(kaylyn)\n\nnot Lincolnian(berna)\n\nUnfaithful(berna) and forall x (Unfaithful(x) -> Awful(x)) -> therefore Awful(berna) Awful(berna) and Unfaithful(berna) and forall x (Awful(x) and Unfaithful(x) -> Lincolnian(x)) -> therefore Lincolnian(berna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Gretna is stunning. Rhiamon is not rightmost. Big things are bastardly. Young things are tailored. If something is bastardly and rightmost then it is tailored. If something is alar and not stunning then it is rare. If something is rightmost then it is rare. If something is bastardly and not stunning then it is rightmost. If something is tailored and stunning then it is alar. If Rhiamon is stunning and Rhiamon is not alar then Rhiamon is not rare. Gretna is bastardly.", "logic": "\nStunning(gretna)\nnot Rightmost(rhiamon)\nforall x (Alar(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Rightmost(x) -> Tailored(x))\nforall x (Alar(x) and not Stunning(x) -> Rare(x))\nforall x (Rightmost(x) -> Rare(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and not Stunning(x) -> Rightmost(x))\nforall x (Tailored(x) and Stunning(x) -> Alar(x))\nStunning(rhiamon) and not Alar(rhiamon) -> not Rare(rhiamon)\n\nBastardly(gretna)\n\nStunning(gretna) and forall x (Stunning(x) -> Tailored(x)) -> therefore Tailored(gretna) Tailored(gretna) and Stunning(gretna) and forall x (Tailored(x) and Stunning(x) -> Alar(x)) -> therefore Alar(gretna) Alar(gretna) and forall x (Alar(x) -> Bastardly(x)) -> therefore Bastardly(gretna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Leann is canary. Sapphira is not sluicing. Big things are smoky. Young things are fingerlike. If something is smoky and sluicing then it is fingerlike. If something is ascetic and not canary then it is ceremonial. If something is sluicing then it is ceremonial. If something is smoky and not canary then it is sluicing. If something is fingerlike and canary then it is ascetic. If Sapphira is canary and Sapphira is not ascetic then Sapphira is not ceremonial. Leann is not smoky.", "logic": "\nCanary(leann)\nnot Sluicing(sapphira)\nforall x (Ascetic(x) -> Smoky(x))\nforall x (Canary(x) -> Fingerlike(x))\nforall x (Smoky(x) and Sluicing(x) -> Fingerlike(x))\nforall x (Ascetic(x) and not Canary(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Sluicing(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Smoky(x) and not Canary(x) -> Sluicing(x))\nforall x (Fingerlike(x) and Canary(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nCanary(sapphira) and not Ascetic(sapphira) -> not Ceremonial(sapphira)\n\nnot Smoky(leann)\n\nCanary(leann) and forall x (Canary(x) -> Fingerlike(x)) -> therefore Fingerlike(leann) Fingerlike(leann) and Canary(leann) and forall x (Fingerlike(x) and Canary(x) -> Ascetic(x)) -> therefore Ascetic(leann) Ascetic(leann) and forall x (Ascetic(x) -> Smoky(x)) -> therefore Smoky(leann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Orelle is tinseled. Ramsey is not zestful. Big things are bust. Young things are copular. If something is bust and zestful then it is copular. If something is tepid and not tinseled then it is untied. If something is zestful then it is untied. If something is bust and not tinseled then it is zestful. If something is copular and tinseled then it is tepid. If Ramsey is tinseled and Ramsey is not tepid then Ramsey is not untied. Orelle is not untied.", "logic": "\nTinseled(orelle)\nnot Zestful(ramsey)\nforall x (Tepid(x) -> Bust(x))\nforall x (Tinseled(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Bust(x) and Zestful(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Tepid(x) and not Tinseled(x) -> Untied(x))\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Untied(x))\nforall x (Bust(x) and not Tinseled(x) -> Zestful(x))\nforall x (Copular(x) and Tinseled(x) -> Tepid(x))\nTinseled(ramsey) and not Tepid(ramsey) -> not Untied(ramsey)\n\nnot Untied(orelle)\n\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Untied(x)) <- forall x (Bust(x) and not Tinseled(x) -> Zestful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Marrilee is temperate. Loreen is not brimming. Big things are unstressed. Young things are phreatic. If something is unstressed and brimming then it is phreatic. If something is worn and not temperate then it is operable. If something is brimming then it is operable. If something is unstressed and not temperate then it is brimming. If something is phreatic and temperate then it is worn. If Loreen is temperate and Loreen is not worn then Loreen is not operable. Loreen is worn.", "logic": "\nTemperate(marrilee)\nnot Brimming(loreen)\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Unstressed(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Unstressed(x) and Brimming(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) and not Temperate(x) -> Operable(x))\nforall x (Brimming(x) -> Operable(x))\nforall x (Unstressed(x) and not Temperate(x) -> Brimming(x))\nforall x (Phreatic(x) and Temperate(x) -> Worn(x))\nTemperate(loreen) and not Worn(loreen) -> not Operable(loreen)\n\nWorn(loreen)\n\nforall x (Phreatic(x) and Temperate(x) -> Worn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Tyrone is breathless. Edwina is not unfearing. Big things are calendric. Young things are arabic. If something is calendric and unfearing then it is arabic. If something is fungoid and not breathless then it is ebony. If something is unfearing then it is ebony. If something is calendric and not breathless then it is unfearing. If something is arabic and breathless then it is fungoid. If Edwina is breathless and Edwina is not fungoid then Edwina is not ebony. Edwina is not arabic.", "logic": "\nBreathless(tyrone)\nnot Unfearing(edwina)\nforall x (Fungoid(x) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) -> Arabic(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Arabic(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and not Breathless(x) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) and not Breathless(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Arabic(x) and Breathless(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nBreathless(edwina) and not Fungoid(edwina) -> not Ebony(edwina)\n\nnot Arabic(edwina)\n\nforall x (Breathless(x) -> Arabic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Moss is cherry. Madlen is not provoked. Big things are volumetric. Young things are trivalent. If something is volumetric and provoked then it is trivalent. If something is reanimated and not cherry then it is headfirst. If something is provoked then it is headfirst. If something is volumetric and not cherry then it is provoked. If something is trivalent and cherry then it is reanimated. If Madlen is cherry and Madlen is not reanimated then Madlen is not headfirst. Moss is provoked.", "logic": "\nCherry(moss)\nnot Provoked(madlen)\nforall x (Reanimated(x) -> Volumetric(x))\nforall x (Cherry(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) and Provoked(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nforall x (Reanimated(x) and not Cherry(x) -> Headfirst(x))\nforall x (Provoked(x) -> Headfirst(x))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) and not Cherry(x) -> Provoked(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) and Cherry(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nCherry(madlen) and not Reanimated(madlen) -> not Headfirst(madlen)\n\nProvoked(moss)\n\nforall x (Volumetric(x) and not Cherry(x) -> Provoked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Marsh is pernickety. Sarena is not nuts. Big things are unbiased. Young things are uremic. If something is unbiased and nuts then it is uremic. If something is intended and not pernickety then it is gradatory. If something is nuts then it is gradatory. If something is unbiased and not pernickety then it is nuts. If something is uremic and pernickety then it is intended. If Sarena is pernickety and Sarena is not intended then Sarena is not gradatory. Marsh is not nice.", "logic": "\nPernickety(marsh)\nnot Nuts(sarena)\nforall x (Intended(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nforall x (Pernickety(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Nuts(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Intended(x) and not Pernickety(x) -> Gradatory(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Gradatory(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and not Pernickety(x) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Uremic(x) and Pernickety(x) -> Intended(x))\nPernickety(sarena) and not Intended(sarena) -> not Gradatory(sarena)\n\nnot Nice(marsh)\n\nnot Nice(marsh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Jethro is lxii. Quentin is not mined. Big things are unhindered. Young things are held. If something is unhindered and mined then it is held. If something is unassuming and not lxii then it is confucian. If something is mined then it is confucian. If something is unhindered and not lxii then it is mined. If something is held and lxii then it is unassuming. If Quentin is lxii and Quentin is not unassuming then Quentin is not confucian. Quentin is nice.", "logic": "\nLxii(jethro)\nnot Mined(quentin)\nforall x (Unassuming(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Lxii(x) -> Held(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and Mined(x) -> Held(x))\nforall x (Unassuming(x) and not Lxii(x) -> Confucian(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) -> Confucian(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and not Lxii(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Held(x) and Lxii(x) -> Unassuming(x))\nLxii(quentin) and not Unassuming(quentin) -> not Confucian(quentin)\n\nNice(quentin)\n\nNice(quentin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "The issie is billion. If the issie is verboten then the issie is awakened. Round, scalar things are verboten. If the issie is billion and the issie is scalar then the issie is awakened. If the issie is cubical and the issie is awakened then the issie is billion. If the issie is billion then the issie is scalar. Young things are scalar. The issie is billion.", "logic": "\nBillion(issie)\nVerboten(issie) -> Awakened(issie)\nforall x (Awakened(x) and Scalar(x) -> Verboten(x))\nBillion(issie) and Scalar(issie) -> Awakened(issie)\nCubical(issie) and Awakened(issie) -> Billion(issie)\nBillion(issie) -> Scalar(issie)\nforall x (Cubical(x) -> Scalar(x))\n\nBillion(issie)\n\ntherefore Billion(issie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The glyn is crushed. If the glyn is regular then the glyn is scheduled. Round, touching things are regular. If the glyn is crushed and the glyn is touching then the glyn is scheduled. If the glyn is nucleate and the glyn is scheduled then the glyn is crushed. If the glyn is crushed then the glyn is touching. Young things are touching. The glyn is not crushed.", "logic": "\nCrushed(glyn)\nRegular(glyn) -> Scheduled(glyn)\nforall x (Scheduled(x) and Touching(x) -> Regular(x))\nCrushed(glyn) and Touching(glyn) -> Scheduled(glyn)\nNucleate(glyn) and Scheduled(glyn) -> Crushed(glyn)\nCrushed(glyn) -> Touching(glyn)\nforall x (Nucleate(x) -> Touching(x))\n\nnot Crushed(glyn)\n\ntherefore Crushed(glyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The leopold is fell. If the leopold is assurgent then the leopold is lxxxiv. Round, anecdotal things are assurgent. If the leopold is fell and the leopold is anecdotal then the leopold is lxxxiv. If the leopold is spanking and the leopold is lxxxiv then the leopold is fell. If the leopold is fell then the leopold is anecdotal. Young things are anecdotal. The leopold is anecdotal.", "logic": "\nFell(leopold)\nAssurgent(leopold) -> Lxxxiv(leopold)\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) and Anecdotal(x) -> Assurgent(x))\nFell(leopold) and Anecdotal(leopold) -> Lxxxiv(leopold)\nSpanking(leopold) and Lxxxiv(leopold) -> Fell(leopold)\nFell(leopold) -> Anecdotal(leopold)\nforall x (Spanking(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\n\nAnecdotal(leopold)\n\nFell(leopold) and Fell(leopold) -> Anecdotal(leopold) -> therefore Anecdotal(leopold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The desmund is readable. If the desmund is pelecypod then the desmund is lordless. Round, guilty things are pelecypod. If the desmund is readable and the desmund is guilty then the desmund is lordless. If the desmund is pupillary and the desmund is lordless then the desmund is readable. If the desmund is readable then the desmund is guilty. Young things are guilty. The desmund is not guilty.", "logic": "\nReadable(desmund)\nPelecypod(desmund) -> Lordless(desmund)\nforall x (Lordless(x) and Guilty(x) -> Pelecypod(x))\nReadable(desmund) and Guilty(desmund) -> Lordless(desmund)\nPupillary(desmund) and Lordless(desmund) -> Readable(desmund)\nReadable(desmund) -> Guilty(desmund)\nforall x (Pupillary(x) -> Guilty(x))\n\nnot Guilty(desmund)\n\nReadable(desmund) and Readable(desmund) -> Guilty(desmund) -> therefore Guilty(desmund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The darelle is heedful. If the darelle is aphyllous then the darelle is graceless. Round, cerebral things are aphyllous. If the darelle is heedful and the darelle is cerebral then the darelle is graceless. If the darelle is haemic and the darelle is graceless then the darelle is heedful. If the darelle is heedful then the darelle is cerebral. Young things are cerebral. The darelle is graceless.", "logic": "\nHeedful(darelle)\nAphyllous(darelle) -> Graceless(darelle)\nforall x (Graceless(x) and Cerebral(x) -> Aphyllous(x))\nHeedful(darelle) and Cerebral(darelle) -> Graceless(darelle)\nHaemic(darelle) and Graceless(darelle) -> Heedful(darelle)\nHeedful(darelle) -> Cerebral(darelle)\nforall x (Haemic(x) -> Cerebral(x))\n\nGraceless(darelle)\n\nHeedful(darelle) and Heedful(darelle) -> Cerebral(darelle) -> therefore Cerebral(darelle) Heedful(darelle) and Cerebral(darelle) and Heedful(darelle) and Cerebral(darelle) -> Graceless(darelle) -> therefore Graceless(darelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The ingaberg is perforate. If the ingaberg is hemolytic then the ingaberg is lancelike. Round, identified things are hemolytic. If the ingaberg is perforate and the ingaberg is identified then the ingaberg is lancelike. If the ingaberg is noachian and the ingaberg is lancelike then the ingaberg is perforate. If the ingaberg is perforate then the ingaberg is identified. Young things are identified. The ingaberg is not lancelike.", "logic": "\nPerforate(ingaberg)\nHemolytic(ingaberg) -> Lancelike(ingaberg)\nforall x (Lancelike(x) and Identified(x) -> Hemolytic(x))\nPerforate(ingaberg) and Identified(ingaberg) -> Lancelike(ingaberg)\nNoachian(ingaberg) and Lancelike(ingaberg) -> Perforate(ingaberg)\nPerforate(ingaberg) -> Identified(ingaberg)\nforall x (Noachian(x) -> Identified(x))\n\nnot Lancelike(ingaberg)\n\nPerforate(ingaberg) and Perforate(ingaberg) -> Identified(ingaberg) -> therefore Identified(ingaberg) Perforate(ingaberg) and Identified(ingaberg) and Perforate(ingaberg) and Identified(ingaberg) -> Lancelike(ingaberg) -> therefore Lancelike(ingaberg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The durante is fastened. If the durante is oaken then the durante is public. Round, muzzy things are oaken. If the durante is fastened and the durante is muzzy then the durante is public. If the durante is tracheal and the durante is public then the durante is fastened. If the durante is fastened then the durante is muzzy. Young things are muzzy. The durante is oaken.", "logic": "\nFastened(durante)\nOaken(durante) -> Public(durante)\nforall x (Public(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Oaken(x))\nFastened(durante) and Muzzy(durante) -> Public(durante)\nTracheal(durante) and Public(durante) -> Fastened(durante)\nFastened(durante) -> Muzzy(durante)\nforall x (Tracheal(x) -> Muzzy(x))\n\nOaken(durante)\n\nFastened(durante) and Fastened(durante) -> Muzzy(durante) -> therefore Muzzy(durante) Fastened(durante) and Muzzy(durante) and Fastened(durante) and Muzzy(durante) -> Public(durante) -> therefore Public(durante) Fastened(durante) and Fastened(durante) -> Muzzy(durante) -> therefore Muzzy(durante) Public(durante) and Muzzy(durante) and forall x (Public(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Oaken(x)) -> therefore Oaken(durante)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The fran is unwarmed. If the fran is rejoicing then the fran is hortative. Round, sciolistic things are rejoicing. If the fran is unwarmed and the fran is sciolistic then the fran is hortative. If the fran is hypotonic and the fran is hortative then the fran is unwarmed. If the fran is unwarmed then the fran is sciolistic. Young things are sciolistic. The fran is not rejoicing.", "logic": "\nUnwarmed(fran)\nRejoicing(fran) -> Hortative(fran)\nforall x (Hortative(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> Rejoicing(x))\nUnwarmed(fran) and Sciolistic(fran) -> Hortative(fran)\nHypotonic(fran) and Hortative(fran) -> Unwarmed(fran)\nUnwarmed(fran) -> Sciolistic(fran)\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\n\nnot Rejoicing(fran)\n\nUnwarmed(fran) and Unwarmed(fran) -> Sciolistic(fran) -> therefore Sciolistic(fran) Unwarmed(fran) and Sciolistic(fran) and Unwarmed(fran) and Sciolistic(fran) -> Hortative(fran) -> therefore Hortative(fran) Unwarmed(fran) and Unwarmed(fran) -> Sciolistic(fran) -> therefore Sciolistic(fran) Hortative(fran) and Sciolistic(fran) and forall x (Hortative(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> Rejoicing(x)) -> therefore Rejoicing(fran)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The lesley is game. If the lesley is sugared then the lesley is probative. Round, motherless things are sugared. If the lesley is game and the lesley is motherless then the lesley is probative. If the lesley is frowning and the lesley is probative then the lesley is game. If the lesley is game then the lesley is motherless. Young things are motherless. The lesley is not frowning.", "logic": "\nGame(lesley)\nSugared(lesley) -> Probative(lesley)\nforall x (Probative(x) and Motherless(x) -> Sugared(x))\nGame(lesley) and Motherless(lesley) -> Probative(lesley)\nFrowning(lesley) and Probative(lesley) -> Game(lesley)\nGame(lesley) -> Motherless(lesley)\nforall x (Frowning(x) -> Motherless(x))\n\nnot Frowning(lesley)\n\nnot Frowning(lesley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The ariella is dismayed. If the ariella is clouded then the ariella is humongous. Round, shed things are clouded. If the ariella is dismayed and the ariella is shed then the ariella is humongous. If the ariella is modified and the ariella is humongous then the ariella is dismayed. If the ariella is dismayed then the ariella is shed. Young things are shed. The ariella needs the ariella.", "logic": "\nDismayed(ariella)\nClouded(ariella) -> Humongous(ariella)\nforall x (Humongous(x) and Shed(x) -> Clouded(x))\nDismayed(ariella) and Shed(ariella) -> Humongous(ariella)\nModified(ariella) and Humongous(ariella) -> Dismayed(ariella)\nDismayed(ariella) -> Shed(ariella)\nforall x (Modified(x) -> Shed(x))\n\nNeeds(ariella, ariella)\n\nNeeds(ariella, ariella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The scarlet is unlike. If the scarlet is somalian then the scarlet is unisex. Round, neonatal things are somalian. If the scarlet is unlike and the scarlet is neonatal then the scarlet is unisex. If the scarlet is quadrate and the scarlet is unisex then the scarlet is unlike. If the scarlet is unlike then the scarlet is neonatal. Young things are neonatal. The scarlet does not eat the scarlet.", "logic": "\nUnlike(scarlet)\nSomalian(scarlet) -> Unisex(scarlet)\nforall x (Unisex(x) and Neonatal(x) -> Somalian(x))\nUnlike(scarlet) and Neonatal(scarlet) -> Unisex(scarlet)\nQuadrate(scarlet) and Unisex(scarlet) -> Unlike(scarlet)\nUnlike(scarlet) -> Neonatal(scarlet)\nforall x (Quadrate(x) -> Neonatal(x))\n\nnot Eats(scarlet, scarlet)\n\nnot Eats(scarlet, scarlet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The patsy is gabled. If the patsy is bulbed then the patsy is thankful. Round, epistemic things are bulbed. If the patsy is gabled and the patsy is epistemic then the patsy is thankful. If the patsy is loth and the patsy is thankful then the patsy is gabled. If the patsy is gabled then the patsy is epistemic. Young things are epistemic. The patsy visits the patsy.", "logic": "\nGabled(patsy)\nBulbed(patsy) -> Thankful(patsy)\nforall x (Thankful(x) and Epistemic(x) -> Bulbed(x))\nGabled(patsy) and Epistemic(patsy) -> Thankful(patsy)\nLoth(patsy) and Thankful(patsy) -> Gabled(patsy)\nGabled(patsy) -> Epistemic(patsy)\nforall x (Loth(x) -> Epistemic(x))\n\nVisits(patsy, patsy)\n\nVisits(patsy, patsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "Arlen is gigantic. Arlen is sneering. Arlen is praising. Arlen is tinkling. Arlen is nonaligned. Arlen is glabrous. Arlen is permutable. Ferdinand is praising. Ferdinand is nonaligned. Edward is gigantic. Edward is sneering. Edward is praising. Edward is tinkling. Edward is nonaligned. Edward is glabrous. Edward is permutable. If someone is gigantic then they are nonaligned. If Ferdinand is glabrous then Ferdinand is sneering. Green people are glabrous. Cold people are glabrous. Furry people are tinkling. Cold people are glabrous. If Edward is tinkling and Edward is nonaligned then Edward is permutable. All permutable people are gigantic. Edward is praising.", "logic": "\nGigantic(arlen)\nSneering(arlen)\nPraising(arlen)\nTinkling(arlen)\nNonaligned(arlen)\nGlabrous(arlen)\nPermutable(arlen)\nPraising(ferdinand)\nNonaligned(ferdinand)\nGigantic(edward)\nSneering(edward)\nPraising(edward)\nTinkling(edward)\nNonaligned(edward)\nGlabrous(edward)\nPermutable(edward)\nforall x (Gigantic(x) -> Nonaligned(x))\nGlabrous(ferdinand) -> Sneering(ferdinand)\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nforall x (Sneering(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Tinkling(x))\nforall x (Sneering(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nTinkling(edward) and Nonaligned(edward) -> Permutable(edward)\nforall x (Permutable(x) -> Gigantic(x))\n\nPraising(edward)\n\ntherefore Praising(edward)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Kasey is liveborn. Kasey is hindering. Kasey is infinite. Kasey is biased. Kasey is ohmic. Kasey is changed. Kasey is orwellian. Ahmet is infinite. Ahmet is ohmic. Drea is liveborn. Drea is hindering. Drea is infinite. Drea is biased. Drea is ohmic. Drea is changed. Drea is orwellian. If someone is liveborn then they are ohmic. If Ahmet is changed then Ahmet is hindering. Green people are changed. Cold people are changed. Furry people are biased. Cold people are changed. If Drea is biased and Drea is ohmic then Drea is orwellian. All orwellian people are liveborn. Ahmet is not ohmic.", "logic": "\nLiveborn(kasey)\nHindering(kasey)\nInfinite(kasey)\nBiased(kasey)\nOhmic(kasey)\nChanged(kasey)\nOrwellian(kasey)\nInfinite(ahmet)\nOhmic(ahmet)\nLiveborn(drea)\nHindering(drea)\nInfinite(drea)\nBiased(drea)\nOhmic(drea)\nChanged(drea)\nOrwellian(drea)\nforall x (Liveborn(x) -> Ohmic(x))\nChanged(ahmet) -> Hindering(ahmet)\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Changed(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Changed(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) -> Biased(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Changed(x))\nBiased(drea) and Ohmic(drea) -> Orwellian(drea)\nforall x (Orwellian(x) -> Liveborn(x))\n\nnot Ohmic(ahmet)\n\ntherefore Ohmic(ahmet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Cyrill is camphoric. Cyrill is onetime. Cyrill is pectoral. Cyrill is select. Cyrill is sterilised. Cyrill is similar. Cyrill is mimic. Alla is pectoral. Alla is sterilised. Kane is camphoric. Kane is onetime. Kane is pectoral. Kane is select. Kane is sterilised. Kane is similar. Kane is mimic. If someone is camphoric then they are sterilised. If Alla is similar then Alla is onetime. Green people are similar. Cold people are similar. Furry people are select. Cold people are similar. If Kane is select and Kane is sterilised then Kane is mimic. All mimic people are camphoric. Alla is select.", "logic": "\nCamphoric(cyrill)\nOnetime(cyrill)\nPectoral(cyrill)\nSelect(cyrill)\nSterilised(cyrill)\nSimilar(cyrill)\nMimic(cyrill)\nPectoral(alla)\nSterilised(alla)\nCamphoric(kane)\nOnetime(kane)\nPectoral(kane)\nSelect(kane)\nSterilised(kane)\nSimilar(kane)\nMimic(kane)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Sterilised(x))\nSimilar(alla) -> Onetime(alla)\nforall x (Select(x) -> Similar(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Similar(x))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Similar(x))\nSelect(kane) and Sterilised(kane) -> Mimic(kane)\nforall x (Mimic(x) -> Camphoric(x))\n\nSelect(alla)\n\nPectoral(alla) and forall x (Pectoral(x) -> Select(x)) -> therefore Select(alla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Marni is usable. Marni is comforted. Marni is uncoloured. Marni is vaulting. Marni is orgiastic. Marni is acroscopic. Marni is versatile. Amalee is uncoloured. Amalee is orgiastic. Lorna is usable. Lorna is comforted. Lorna is uncoloured. Lorna is vaulting. Lorna is orgiastic. Lorna is acroscopic. Lorna is versatile. If someone is usable then they are orgiastic. If Amalee is acroscopic then Amalee is comforted. Green people are acroscopic. Cold people are acroscopic. Furry people are vaulting. Cold people are acroscopic. If Lorna is vaulting and Lorna is orgiastic then Lorna is versatile. All versatile people are usable. Amalee is not vaulting.", "logic": "\nUsable(marni)\nComforted(marni)\nUncoloured(marni)\nVaulting(marni)\nOrgiastic(marni)\nAcroscopic(marni)\nVersatile(marni)\nUncoloured(amalee)\nOrgiastic(amalee)\nUsable(lorna)\nComforted(lorna)\nUncoloured(lorna)\nVaulting(lorna)\nOrgiastic(lorna)\nAcroscopic(lorna)\nVersatile(lorna)\nforall x (Usable(x) -> Orgiastic(x))\nAcroscopic(amalee) -> Comforted(amalee)\nforall x (Vaulting(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\nforall x (Comforted(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\nforall x (Uncoloured(x) -> Vaulting(x))\nforall x (Comforted(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\nVaulting(lorna) and Orgiastic(lorna) -> Versatile(lorna)\nforall x (Versatile(x) -> Usable(x))\n\nnot Vaulting(amalee)\n\nUncoloured(amalee) and forall x (Uncoloured(x) -> Vaulting(x)) -> therefore Vaulting(amalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Niels is anesthetic. Niels is fitter. Niels is adsorbate. Niels is appraising. Niels is fake. Niels is xciii. Niels is nucleate. Brena is adsorbate. Brena is fake. Bekki is anesthetic. Bekki is fitter. Bekki is adsorbate. Bekki is appraising. Bekki is fake. Bekki is xciii. Bekki is nucleate. If someone is anesthetic then they are fake. If Brena is xciii then Brena is fitter. Green people are xciii. Cold people are xciii. Furry people are appraising. Cold people are xciii. If Bekki is appraising and Bekki is fake then Bekki is nucleate. All nucleate people are anesthetic. Brena is xciii.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(niels)\nFitter(niels)\nAdsorbate(niels)\nAppraising(niels)\nFake(niels)\nXciii(niels)\nNucleate(niels)\nAdsorbate(brena)\nFake(brena)\nAnesthetic(bekki)\nFitter(bekki)\nAdsorbate(bekki)\nAppraising(bekki)\nFake(bekki)\nXciii(bekki)\nNucleate(bekki)\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Fake(x))\nXciii(brena) -> Fitter(brena)\nforall x (Appraising(x) -> Xciii(x))\nforall x (Fitter(x) -> Xciii(x))\nforall x (Adsorbate(x) -> Appraising(x))\nforall x (Fitter(x) -> Xciii(x))\nAppraising(bekki) and Fake(bekki) -> Nucleate(bekki)\nforall x (Nucleate(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\n\nXciii(brena)\n\nAdsorbate(brena) and forall x (Adsorbate(x) -> Appraising(x)) -> therefore Appraising(brena) Appraising(brena) and forall x (Appraising(x) -> Xciii(x)) -> therefore Xciii(brena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Sarina is anaplastic. Sarina is ethnic. Sarina is suffusive. Sarina is fallible. Sarina is expiratory. Sarina is size. Sarina is crescendo. Alica is suffusive. Alica is expiratory. Marcus is anaplastic. Marcus is ethnic. Marcus is suffusive. Marcus is fallible. Marcus is expiratory. Marcus is size. Marcus is crescendo. If someone is anaplastic then they are expiratory. If Alica is size then Alica is ethnic. Green people are size. Cold people are size. Furry people are fallible. Cold people are size. If Marcus is fallible and Marcus is expiratory then Marcus is crescendo. All crescendo people are anaplastic. Alica is not size.", "logic": "\nAnaplastic(sarina)\nEthnic(sarina)\nSuffusive(sarina)\nFallible(sarina)\nExpiratory(sarina)\nSize(sarina)\nCrescendo(sarina)\nSuffusive(alica)\nExpiratory(alica)\nAnaplastic(marcus)\nEthnic(marcus)\nSuffusive(marcus)\nFallible(marcus)\nExpiratory(marcus)\nSize(marcus)\nCrescendo(marcus)\nforall x (Anaplastic(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nSize(alica) -> Ethnic(alica)\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> Size(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) -> Size(x))\nforall x (Suffusive(x) -> Fallible(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) -> Size(x))\nFallible(marcus) and Expiratory(marcus) -> Crescendo(marcus)\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Anaplastic(x))\n\nnot Size(alica)\n\nSuffusive(alica) and forall x (Suffusive(x) -> Fallible(x)) -> therefore Fallible(alica) Fallible(alica) and forall x (Fallible(x) -> Size(x)) -> therefore Size(alica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Marc is baptised. Marc is offside. Marc is operatic. Marc is uncousinly. Marc is vaulting. Marc is latish. Marc is designed. Kippie is operatic. Kippie is vaulting. Donal is baptised. Donal is offside. Donal is operatic. Donal is uncousinly. Donal is vaulting. Donal is latish. Donal is designed. If someone is baptised then they are vaulting. If Kippie is latish then Kippie is offside. Green people are latish. Cold people are latish. Furry people are uncousinly. Cold people are latish. If Donal is uncousinly and Donal is vaulting then Donal is designed. All designed people are baptised. Kippie is offside.", "logic": "\nBaptised(marc)\nOffside(marc)\nOperatic(marc)\nUncousinly(marc)\nVaulting(marc)\nLatish(marc)\nDesigned(marc)\nOperatic(kippie)\nVaulting(kippie)\nBaptised(donal)\nOffside(donal)\nOperatic(donal)\nUncousinly(donal)\nVaulting(donal)\nLatish(donal)\nDesigned(donal)\nforall x (Baptised(x) -> Vaulting(x))\nLatish(kippie) -> Offside(kippie)\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Latish(x))\nforall x (Offside(x) -> Latish(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\nforall x (Offside(x) -> Latish(x))\nUncousinly(donal) and Vaulting(donal) -> Designed(donal)\nforall x (Designed(x) -> Baptised(x))\n\nOffside(kippie)\n\nOperatic(kippie) and forall x (Operatic(x) -> Uncousinly(x)) -> therefore Uncousinly(kippie) Uncousinly(kippie) and forall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Latish(x)) -> therefore Latish(kippie) Latish(kippie) and Latish(kippie) -> Offside(kippie) -> therefore Offside(kippie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Jacqui is coquettish. Jacqui is archetypal. Jacqui is stiff. Jacqui is myotonic. Jacqui is panicled. Jacqui is confiscate. Jacqui is bibless. Bernard is stiff. Bernard is panicled. Woodie is coquettish. Woodie is archetypal. Woodie is stiff. Woodie is myotonic. Woodie is panicled. Woodie is confiscate. Woodie is bibless. If someone is coquettish then they are panicled. If Bernard is confiscate then Bernard is archetypal. Green people are confiscate. Cold people are confiscate. Furry people are myotonic. Cold people are confiscate. If Woodie is myotonic and Woodie is panicled then Woodie is bibless. All bibless people are coquettish. Bernard is not archetypal.", "logic": "\nCoquettish(jacqui)\nArchetypal(jacqui)\nStiff(jacqui)\nMyotonic(jacqui)\nPanicled(jacqui)\nConfiscate(jacqui)\nBibless(jacqui)\nStiff(bernard)\nPanicled(bernard)\nCoquettish(woodie)\nArchetypal(woodie)\nStiff(woodie)\nMyotonic(woodie)\nPanicled(woodie)\nConfiscate(woodie)\nBibless(woodie)\nforall x (Coquettish(x) -> Panicled(x))\nConfiscate(bernard) -> Archetypal(bernard)\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nforall x (Stiff(x) -> Myotonic(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nMyotonic(woodie) and Panicled(woodie) -> Bibless(woodie)\nforall x (Bibless(x) -> Coquettish(x))\n\nnot Archetypal(bernard)\n\nStiff(bernard) and forall x (Stiff(x) -> Myotonic(x)) -> therefore Myotonic(bernard) Myotonic(bernard) and forall x (Myotonic(x) -> Confiscate(x)) -> therefore Confiscate(bernard) Confiscate(bernard) and Confiscate(bernard) -> Archetypal(bernard) -> therefore Archetypal(bernard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Tatiana is unwashed. Tatiana is rusted. Tatiana is cyan. Tatiana is amok. Tatiana is attachable. Tatiana is uniform. Tatiana is larboard. Danie is cyan. Danie is attachable. Tann is unwashed. Tann is rusted. Tann is cyan. Tann is amok. Tann is attachable. Tann is uniform. Tann is larboard. If someone is unwashed then they are attachable. If Danie is uniform then Danie is rusted. Green people are uniform. Cold people are uniform. Furry people are amok. Cold people are uniform. If Tann is amok and Tann is attachable then Tann is larboard. All larboard people are unwashed. Danie is not unwashed.", "logic": "\nUnwashed(tatiana)\nRusted(tatiana)\nCyan(tatiana)\nAmok(tatiana)\nAttachable(tatiana)\nUniform(tatiana)\nLarboard(tatiana)\nCyan(danie)\nAttachable(danie)\nUnwashed(tann)\nRusted(tann)\nCyan(tann)\nAmok(tann)\nAttachable(tann)\nUniform(tann)\nLarboard(tann)\nforall x (Unwashed(x) -> Attachable(x))\nUniform(danie) -> Rusted(danie)\nforall x (Amok(x) -> Uniform(x))\nforall x (Rusted(x) -> Uniform(x))\nforall x (Cyan(x) -> Amok(x))\nforall x (Rusted(x) -> Uniform(x))\nAmok(tann) and Attachable(tann) -> Larboard(tann)\nforall x (Larboard(x) -> Unwashed(x))\n\nnot Unwashed(danie)\n\nforall x (Larboard(x) -> Unwashed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Masha is thickening. Masha is unratified. Masha is nurtural. Masha is collegial. Masha is synoptic. Masha is moneran. Masha is gripping. Terencio is nurtural. Terencio is synoptic. Cleopatra is thickening. Cleopatra is unratified. Cleopatra is nurtural. Cleopatra is collegial. Cleopatra is synoptic. Cleopatra is moneran. Cleopatra is gripping. If someone is thickening then they are synoptic. If Terencio is moneran then Terencio is unratified. Green people are moneran. Cold people are moneran. Furry people are collegial. Cold people are moneran. If Cleopatra is collegial and Cleopatra is synoptic then Cleopatra is gripping. All gripping people are thickening. Terencio is gripping.", "logic": "\nThickening(masha)\nUnratified(masha)\nNurtural(masha)\nCollegial(masha)\nSynoptic(masha)\nMoneran(masha)\nGripping(masha)\nNurtural(terencio)\nSynoptic(terencio)\nThickening(cleopatra)\nUnratified(cleopatra)\nNurtural(cleopatra)\nCollegial(cleopatra)\nSynoptic(cleopatra)\nMoneran(cleopatra)\nGripping(cleopatra)\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Synoptic(x))\nMoneran(terencio) -> Unratified(terencio)\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Moneran(x))\nforall x (Unratified(x) -> Moneran(x))\nforall x (Nurtural(x) -> Collegial(x))\nforall x (Unratified(x) -> Moneran(x))\nCollegial(cleopatra) and Synoptic(cleopatra) -> Gripping(cleopatra)\nforall x (Gripping(x) -> Thickening(x))\n\nGripping(terencio)\n\nGripping(terencio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Wynn is toasted. Barbette is abbatial. Furry things are affine. If something is toasted then it is clayey. If Barbette is toasted and Barbette is upstart then Barbette is seismal. If something is affine then it is aquaphobic. Furry things are abbatial. Rough, seismal things are clayey. Wynn is toasted.", "logic": "\nToasted(wynn)\nAbbatial(barbette)\nforall x (Clayey(x) -> Affine(x))\nforall x (Toasted(x) -> Clayey(x))\nToasted(barbette) and Upstart(barbette) -> Seismal(barbette)\nforall x (Affine(x) -> Aquaphobic(x))\nforall x (Clayey(x) -> Abbatial(x))\nforall x (Aquaphobic(x) and Seismal(x) -> Clayey(x))\n\nToasted(wynn)\n\ntherefore Toasted(wynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Carlisle is yonder. Jillie is pectineal. Furry things are swarthy. If something is yonder then it is hooflike. If Jillie is yonder and Jillie is alphameric then Jillie is organismic. If something is swarthy then it is agitated. Furry things are pectineal. Rough, organismic things are hooflike. Carlisle is not yonder.", "logic": "\nYonder(carlisle)\nPectineal(jillie)\nforall x (Hooflike(x) -> Swarthy(x))\nforall x (Yonder(x) -> Hooflike(x))\nYonder(jillie) and Alphameric(jillie) -> Organismic(jillie)\nforall x (Swarthy(x) -> Agitated(x))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) and Organismic(x) -> Hooflike(x))\n\nnot Yonder(carlisle)\n\ntherefore Yonder(carlisle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Stan is dantean. Deb is nullified. Furry things are taxonomic. If something is dantean then it is trilled. If Deb is dantean and Deb is footling then Deb is xenogeneic. If something is taxonomic then it is askew. Furry things are nullified. Rough, xenogeneic things are trilled. Stan is trilled.", "logic": "\nDantean(stan)\nNullified(deb)\nforall x (Trilled(x) -> Taxonomic(x))\nforall x (Dantean(x) -> Trilled(x))\nDantean(deb) and Footling(deb) -> Xenogeneic(deb)\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) -> Askew(x))\nforall x (Trilled(x) -> Nullified(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) and Xenogeneic(x) -> Trilled(x))\n\nTrilled(stan)\n\nDantean(stan) and forall x (Dantean(x) -> Trilled(x)) -> therefore Trilled(stan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Tabbie is irregular. Dora is antithetic. Furry things are secret. If something is irregular then it is septate. If Dora is irregular and Dora is remedial then Dora is reusable. If something is secret then it is braky. Furry things are antithetic. Rough, reusable things are septate. Tabbie is not septate.", "logic": "\nIrregular(tabbie)\nAntithetic(dora)\nforall x (Septate(x) -> Secret(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) -> Septate(x))\nIrregular(dora) and Remedial(dora) -> Reusable(dora)\nforall x (Secret(x) -> Braky(x))\nforall x (Septate(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and Reusable(x) -> Septate(x))\n\nnot Septate(tabbie)\n\nIrregular(tabbie) and forall x (Irregular(x) -> Septate(x)) -> therefore Septate(tabbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Peyter is ambrosian. Andra is vapourous. Furry things are bookable. If something is ambrosian then it is parous. If Andra is ambrosian and Andra is unharmed then Andra is immunised. If something is bookable then it is sensuous. Furry things are vapourous. Rough, immunised things are parous. Peyter is bookable.", "logic": "\nAmbrosian(peyter)\nVapourous(andra)\nforall x (Parous(x) -> Bookable(x))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Parous(x))\nAmbrosian(andra) and Unharmed(andra) -> Immunised(andra)\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Sensuous(x))\nforall x (Parous(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Sensuous(x) and Immunised(x) -> Parous(x))\n\nBookable(peyter)\n\nAmbrosian(peyter) and forall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Parous(x)) -> therefore Parous(peyter) Parous(peyter) and forall x (Parous(x) -> Bookable(x)) -> therefore Bookable(peyter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Dasi is moralistic. Evette is payable. Furry things are unwritten. If something is moralistic then it is unbarred. If Evette is moralistic and Evette is prenominal then Evette is unsubdued. If something is unwritten then it is pneumatic. Furry things are payable. Rough, unsubdued things are unbarred. Dasi is not payable.", "logic": "\nMoralistic(dasi)\nPayable(evette)\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Unbarred(x))\nMoralistic(evette) and Prenominal(evette) -> Unsubdued(evette)\nforall x (Unwritten(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Payable(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Unsubdued(x) -> Unbarred(x))\n\nnot Payable(dasi)\n\nMoralistic(dasi) and forall x (Moralistic(x) -> Unbarred(x)) -> therefore Unbarred(dasi) Unbarred(dasi) and forall x (Unbarred(x) -> Payable(x)) -> therefore Payable(dasi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Gabriela is diarrhoeal. Karrah is seamy. Furry things are crookback. If something is diarrhoeal then it is comfy. If Karrah is diarrhoeal and Karrah is biddable then Karrah is austenitic. If something is crookback then it is cataclinal. Furry things are seamy. Rough, austenitic things are comfy. Gabriela is cataclinal.", "logic": "\nDiarrhoeal(gabriela)\nSeamy(karrah)\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Diarrhoeal(x) -> Comfy(x))\nDiarrhoeal(karrah) and Biddable(karrah) -> Austenitic(karrah)\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) and Austenitic(x) -> Comfy(x))\n\nCataclinal(gabriela)\n\nDiarrhoeal(gabriela) and forall x (Diarrhoeal(x) -> Comfy(x)) -> therefore Comfy(gabriela) Comfy(gabriela) and forall x (Comfy(x) -> Crookback(x)) -> therefore Crookback(gabriela) Crookback(gabriela) and forall x (Crookback(x) -> Cataclinal(x)) -> therefore Cataclinal(gabriela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Jayme is naiant. Ethelda is snappish. Furry things are woolly. If something is naiant then it is dynastic. If Ethelda is naiant and Ethelda is clogged then Ethelda is estranging. If something is woolly then it is spinous. Furry things are snappish. Rough, estranging things are dynastic. Jayme is not spinous.", "logic": "\nNaiant(jayme)\nSnappish(ethelda)\nforall x (Dynastic(x) -> Woolly(x))\nforall x (Naiant(x) -> Dynastic(x))\nNaiant(ethelda) and Clogged(ethelda) -> Estranging(ethelda)\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Spinous(x))\nforall x (Dynastic(x) -> Snappish(x))\nforall x (Spinous(x) and Estranging(x) -> Dynastic(x))\n\nnot Spinous(jayme)\n\nNaiant(jayme) and forall x (Naiant(x) -> Dynastic(x)) -> therefore Dynastic(jayme) Dynastic(jayme) and forall x (Dynastic(x) -> Woolly(x)) -> therefore Woolly(jayme) Woolly(jayme) and forall x (Woolly(x) -> Spinous(x)) -> therefore Spinous(jayme)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Teri is charged. Cherish is aroid. Furry things are unvarying. If something is charged then it is banned. If Cherish is charged and Cherish is refreshful then Cherish is sinhalese. If something is unvarying then it is nonmotile. Furry things are aroid. Rough, sinhalese things are banned. Cherish is not banned.", "logic": "\nCharged(teri)\nAroid(cherish)\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Banned(x))\nCharged(cherish) and Refreshful(cherish) -> Sinhalese(cherish)\nforall x (Unvarying(x) -> Nonmotile(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Aroid(x))\nforall x (Nonmotile(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Banned(x))\n\nnot Banned(cherish)\n\nforall x (Nonmotile(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Banned(x)) <- Charged(cherish) and Refreshful(cherish) -> Sinhalese(cherish) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Cammy is pass. Elbertina is safe. Furry things are fernlike. If something is pass then it is hyperemic. If Elbertina is pass and Elbertina is lucifugous then Elbertina is uncombined. If something is fernlike then it is propelling. Furry things are safe. Rough, uncombined things are hyperemic. Elbertina is fernlike.", "logic": "\nPass(cammy)\nSafe(elbertina)\nforall x (Hyperemic(x) -> Fernlike(x))\nforall x (Pass(x) -> Hyperemic(x))\nPass(elbertina) and Lucifugous(elbertina) -> Uncombined(elbertina)\nforall x (Fernlike(x) -> Propelling(x))\nforall x (Hyperemic(x) -> Safe(x))\nforall x (Propelling(x) and Uncombined(x) -> Hyperemic(x))\n\nFernlike(elbertina)\n\nforall x (Hyperemic(x) -> Fernlike(x)) <- forall x (Propelling(x) and Uncombined(x) -> Hyperemic(x)) <- forall x (Fernlike(x) -> Propelling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Brigid is nutbrown. Mindy is copious. Furry things are nettled. If something is nutbrown then it is worrying. If Mindy is nutbrown and Mindy is leibnizian then Mindy is elated. If something is nettled then it is teen. Furry things are copious. Rough, elated things are worrying. Mindy is not elated.", "logic": "\nNutbrown(brigid)\nCopious(mindy)\nforall x (Worrying(x) -> Nettled(x))\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) -> Worrying(x))\nNutbrown(mindy) and Leibnizian(mindy) -> Elated(mindy)\nforall x (Nettled(x) -> Teen(x))\nforall x (Worrying(x) -> Copious(x))\nforall x (Teen(x) and Elated(x) -> Worrying(x))\n\nnot Elated(mindy)\n\nNutbrown(mindy) and Leibnizian(mindy) -> Elated(mindy) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Lisandra is allegoric. Francoise is calico. Furry things are stonelike. If something is allegoric then it is syncopated. If Francoise is allegoric and Francoise is amendatory then Francoise is nonhuman. If something is stonelike then it is uppercase. Furry things are calico. Rough, nonhuman things are syncopated. Francoise is uppercase.", "logic": "\nAllegoric(lisandra)\nCalico(francoise)\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Stonelike(x))\nforall x (Allegoric(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nAllegoric(francoise) and Amendatory(francoise) -> Nonhuman(francoise)\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> Uppercase(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Calico(x))\nforall x (Uppercase(x) and Nonhuman(x) -> Syncopated(x))\n\nUppercase(francoise)\n\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> Uppercase(x)) <- forall x (Syncopated(x) -> Stonelike(x)) <- forall x (Allegoric(x) -> Syncopated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Bradley is raffish. Alia is edgy. Furry things are bungaloid. If something is raffish then it is pugilistic. If Alia is raffish and Alia is provident then Alia is whacky. If something is bungaloid then it is gerundial. Furry things are edgy. Rough, whacky things are pugilistic. Alia is not raffish.", "logic": "\nRaffish(bradley)\nEdgy(alia)\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Raffish(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nRaffish(alia) and Provident(alia) -> Whacky(alia)\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) -> Gerundial(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Edgy(x))\nforall x (Gerundial(x) and Whacky(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\n\nnot Raffish(alia)\n\nnot Raffish(alia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Vito is arguable. Emelyne is forward. Furry things are artless. If something is arguable then it is buoyant. If Emelyne is arguable and Emelyne is amygdaloid then Emelyne is hunched. If something is artless then it is brusque. Furry things are forward. Rough, hunched things are buoyant. Vito is amygdaloid.", "logic": "\nArguable(vito)\nForward(emelyne)\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> Artless(x))\nforall x (Arguable(x) -> Buoyant(x))\nArguable(emelyne) and Amygdaloid(emelyne) -> Hunched(emelyne)\nforall x (Artless(x) -> Brusque(x))\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> Forward(x))\nforall x (Brusque(x) and Hunched(x) -> Buoyant(x))\n\nAmygdaloid(vito)\n\nAmygdaloid(vito) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Vin is cancelled. Kalli is thoriated. Furry things are ornate. If something is cancelled then it is fringy. If Kalli is cancelled and Kalli is hertzian then Kalli is upwind. If something is ornate then it is genital. Furry things are thoriated. Rough, upwind things are fringy. Kalli is not hertzian.", "logic": "\nCancelled(vin)\nThoriated(kalli)\nforall x (Fringy(x) -> Ornate(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) -> Fringy(x))\nCancelled(kalli) and Hertzian(kalli) -> Upwind(kalli)\nforall x (Ornate(x) -> Genital(x))\nforall x (Fringy(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nforall x (Genital(x) and Upwind(x) -> Fringy(x))\n\nnot Hertzian(kalli)\n\nnot Hertzian(kalli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Glenn is renegade. Valentina is favourite. Furry things are clouded. If something is renegade then it is stalwart. If Valentina is renegade and Valentina is borderline then Valentina is degage. If something is clouded then it is footless. Furry things are favourite. Rough, degage things are stalwart. Glenn is degage.", "logic": "\nRenegade(glenn)\nFavourite(valentina)\nforall x (Stalwart(x) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Renegade(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nRenegade(valentina) and Borderline(valentina) -> Degage(valentina)\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Footless(x))\nforall x (Stalwart(x) -> Favourite(x))\nforall x (Footless(x) and Degage(x) -> Stalwart(x))\n\nDegage(glenn)\n\nDegage(glenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "The yehudi is modulated. All stalemated, modulated things are biannual. All hangdog, modulated things are biannual. Cold, stalemated things are biannual. All biannual, modulated things are cacophonic. If the yehudi is biannual then the yehudi is cacophonic. All modulated things are stalemated. If the yehudi is cacophonic and the yehudi is hangdog then the yehudi is not stalemated. If the yehudi is hangdog and the yehudi is not modulated then the yehudi is not stalemated. The yehudi is modulated.", "logic": "\nModulated(yehudi)\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Modulated(x) -> Biannual(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) and Modulated(x) -> Biannual(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) and Stalemated(x) -> Biannual(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) and Modulated(x) -> Cacophonic(x))\nBiannual(yehudi) -> Cacophonic(yehudi)\nforall x (Modulated(x) -> Stalemated(x))\nCacophonic(yehudi) and Hangdog(yehudi) -> not Stalemated(yehudi)\nHangdog(yehudi) and not Modulated(yehudi) -> not Stalemated(yehudi)\n\nModulated(yehudi)\n\ntherefore Modulated(yehudi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The redford is capitulary. All proximo, capitulary things are twelve. All innovative, capitulary things are twelve. Cold, proximo things are twelve. All twelve, capitulary things are unrelated. If the redford is twelve then the redford is unrelated. All capitulary things are proximo. If the redford is unrelated and the redford is innovative then the redford is not proximo. If the redford is innovative and the redford is not capitulary then the redford is not proximo. The redford is not capitulary.", "logic": "\nCapitulary(redford)\nforall x (Proximo(x) and Capitulary(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) and Capitulary(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) and Proximo(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Twelve(x) and Capitulary(x) -> Unrelated(x))\nTwelve(redford) -> Unrelated(redford)\nforall x (Capitulary(x) -> Proximo(x))\nUnrelated(redford) and Innovative(redford) -> not Proximo(redford)\nInnovative(redford) and not Capitulary(redford) -> not Proximo(redford)\n\nnot Capitulary(redford)\n\ntherefore Capitulary(redford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The dorothy is diminutive. All aeriferous, diminutive things are distracted. All spondaic, diminutive things are distracted. Cold, aeriferous things are distracted. All distracted, diminutive things are vague. If the dorothy is distracted then the dorothy is vague. All diminutive things are aeriferous. If the dorothy is vague and the dorothy is spondaic then the dorothy is not aeriferous. If the dorothy is spondaic and the dorothy is not diminutive then the dorothy is not aeriferous. The dorothy is aeriferous.", "logic": "\nDiminutive(dorothy)\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) and Diminutive(x) -> Distracted(x))\nforall x (Spondaic(x) and Diminutive(x) -> Distracted(x))\nforall x (Spondaic(x) and Aeriferous(x) -> Distracted(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) and Diminutive(x) -> Vague(x))\nDistracted(dorothy) -> Vague(dorothy)\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nVague(dorothy) and Spondaic(dorothy) -> not Aeriferous(dorothy)\nSpondaic(dorothy) and not Diminutive(dorothy) -> not Aeriferous(dorothy)\n\nAeriferous(dorothy)\n\nDiminutive(dorothy) and forall x (Diminutive(x) -> Aeriferous(x)) -> therefore Aeriferous(dorothy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The lloyd is reptilian. All abstinent, reptilian things are shattered. All czaristic, reptilian things are shattered. Cold, abstinent things are shattered. All shattered, reptilian things are paroicous. If the lloyd is shattered then the lloyd is paroicous. All reptilian things are abstinent. If the lloyd is paroicous and the lloyd is czaristic then the lloyd is not abstinent. If the lloyd is czaristic and the lloyd is not reptilian then the lloyd is not abstinent. The lloyd is not abstinent.", "logic": "\nReptilian(lloyd)\nforall x (Abstinent(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Shattered(x))\nforall x (Czaristic(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Shattered(x))\nforall x (Czaristic(x) and Abstinent(x) -> Shattered(x))\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nShattered(lloyd) -> Paroicous(lloyd)\nforall x (Reptilian(x) -> Abstinent(x))\nParoicous(lloyd) and Czaristic(lloyd) -> not Abstinent(lloyd)\nCzaristic(lloyd) and not Reptilian(lloyd) -> not Abstinent(lloyd)\n\nnot Abstinent(lloyd)\n\nReptilian(lloyd) and forall x (Reptilian(x) -> Abstinent(x)) -> therefore Abstinent(lloyd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The chandra is odious. All acephalous, odious things are beery. All afeard, odious things are beery. Cold, acephalous things are beery. All beery, odious things are uniformed. If the chandra is beery then the chandra is uniformed. All odious things are acephalous. If the chandra is uniformed and the chandra is afeard then the chandra is not acephalous. If the chandra is afeard and the chandra is not odious then the chandra is not acephalous. The chandra is beery.", "logic": "\nOdious(chandra)\nforall x (Acephalous(x) and Odious(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Afeard(x) and Odious(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Afeard(x) and Acephalous(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) and Odious(x) -> Uniformed(x))\nBeery(chandra) -> Uniformed(chandra)\nforall x (Odious(x) -> Acephalous(x))\nUniformed(chandra) and Afeard(chandra) -> not Acephalous(chandra)\nAfeard(chandra) and not Odious(chandra) -> not Acephalous(chandra)\n\nBeery(chandra)\n\nOdious(chandra) and forall x (Odious(x) -> Acephalous(x)) -> therefore Acephalous(chandra) Acephalous(chandra) and Odious(chandra) and forall x (Acephalous(x) and Odious(x) -> Beery(x)) -> therefore Beery(chandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The kirby is pastoral. All timbered, pastoral things are butyric. All alkaline, pastoral things are butyric. Cold, timbered things are butyric. All butyric, pastoral things are inorganic. If the kirby is butyric then the kirby is inorganic. All pastoral things are timbered. If the kirby is inorganic and the kirby is alkaline then the kirby is not timbered. If the kirby is alkaline and the kirby is not pastoral then the kirby is not timbered. The kirby is not butyric.", "logic": "\nPastoral(kirby)\nforall x (Timbered(x) and Pastoral(x) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Alkaline(x) and Pastoral(x) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Alkaline(x) and Timbered(x) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) and Pastoral(x) -> Inorganic(x))\nButyric(kirby) -> Inorganic(kirby)\nforall x (Pastoral(x) -> Timbered(x))\nInorganic(kirby) and Alkaline(kirby) -> not Timbered(kirby)\nAlkaline(kirby) and not Pastoral(kirby) -> not Timbered(kirby)\n\nnot Butyric(kirby)\n\nPastoral(kirby) and forall x (Pastoral(x) -> Timbered(x)) -> therefore Timbered(kirby) Timbered(kirby) and Pastoral(kirby) and forall x (Timbered(x) and Pastoral(x) -> Butyric(x)) -> therefore Butyric(kirby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The clancy is hipped. All expressed, hipped things are sublunar. All cloisonne, hipped things are sublunar. Cold, expressed things are sublunar. All sublunar, hipped things are rested. If the clancy is sublunar then the clancy is rested. All hipped things are expressed. If the clancy is rested and the clancy is cloisonne then the clancy is not expressed. If the clancy is cloisonne and the clancy is not hipped then the clancy is not expressed. The clancy is rested.", "logic": "\nHipped(clancy)\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Hipped(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) and Hipped(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) and Expressed(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) and Hipped(x) -> Rested(x))\nSublunar(clancy) -> Rested(clancy)\nforall x (Hipped(x) -> Expressed(x))\nRested(clancy) and Cloisonne(clancy) -> not Expressed(clancy)\nCloisonne(clancy) and not Hipped(clancy) -> not Expressed(clancy)\n\nRested(clancy)\n\nHipped(clancy) and forall x (Hipped(x) -> Expressed(x)) -> therefore Expressed(clancy) Expressed(clancy) and Hipped(clancy) and forall x (Expressed(x) and Hipped(x) -> Sublunar(x)) -> therefore Sublunar(clancy) Sublunar(clancy) and Sublunar(clancy) -> Rested(clancy) -> therefore Rested(clancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The anders is wrathful. All acinar, wrathful things are unanimous. All euphoric, wrathful things are unanimous. Cold, acinar things are unanimous. All unanimous, wrathful things are ghostly. If the anders is unanimous then the anders is ghostly. All wrathful things are acinar. If the anders is ghostly and the anders is euphoric then the anders is not acinar. If the anders is euphoric and the anders is not wrathful then the anders is not acinar. The anders is not ghostly.", "logic": "\nWrathful(anders)\nforall x (Acinar(x) and Wrathful(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nforall x (Euphoric(x) and Wrathful(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nforall x (Euphoric(x) and Acinar(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nforall x (Unanimous(x) and Wrathful(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nUnanimous(anders) -> Ghostly(anders)\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> Acinar(x))\nGhostly(anders) and Euphoric(anders) -> not Acinar(anders)\nEuphoric(anders) and not Wrathful(anders) -> not Acinar(anders)\n\nnot Ghostly(anders)\n\nWrathful(anders) and forall x (Wrathful(x) -> Acinar(x)) -> therefore Acinar(anders) Acinar(anders) and Wrathful(anders) and forall x (Acinar(x) and Wrathful(x) -> Unanimous(x)) -> therefore Unanimous(anders) Unanimous(anders) and Unanimous(anders) -> Ghostly(anders) -> therefore Ghostly(anders)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The elbert is senescent. All swank, senescent things are panicky. All nonhuman, senescent things are panicky. Cold, swank things are panicky. All panicky, senescent things are rigid. If the elbert is panicky then the elbert is rigid. All senescent things are swank. If the elbert is rigid and the elbert is nonhuman then the elbert is not swank. If the elbert is nonhuman and the elbert is not senescent then the elbert is not swank. The elbert is not nonhuman.", "logic": "\nSenescent(elbert)\nforall x (Swank(x) and Senescent(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) and Senescent(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) and Swank(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Panicky(x) and Senescent(x) -> Rigid(x))\nPanicky(elbert) -> Rigid(elbert)\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> Swank(x))\nRigid(elbert) and Nonhuman(elbert) -> not Swank(elbert)\nNonhuman(elbert) and not Senescent(elbert) -> not Swank(elbert)\n\nnot Nonhuman(elbert)\n\nnot Nonhuman(elbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The prudi is pasted. All semirigid, pasted things are nominated. All spiderly, pasted things are nominated. Cold, semirigid things are nominated. All nominated, pasted things are mastoid. If the prudi is nominated then the prudi is mastoid. All pasted things are semirigid. If the prudi is mastoid and the prudi is spiderly then the prudi is not semirigid. If the prudi is spiderly and the prudi is not pasted then the prudi is not semirigid. The prudi sees the prudi.", "logic": "\nPasted(prudi)\nforall x (Semirigid(x) and Pasted(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) and Pasted(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and Pasted(x) -> Mastoid(x))\nNominated(prudi) -> Mastoid(prudi)\nforall x (Pasted(x) -> Semirigid(x))\nMastoid(prudi) and Spiderly(prudi) -> not Semirigid(prudi)\nSpiderly(prudi) and not Pasted(prudi) -> not Semirigid(prudi)\n\nSees(prudi, prudi)\n\nSees(prudi, prudi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The dennis is teal. All knightly, teal things are accredited. All stingy, teal things are accredited. Cold, knightly things are accredited. All accredited, teal things are dextrorse. If the dennis is accredited then the dennis is dextrorse. All teal things are knightly. If the dennis is dextrorse and the dennis is stingy then the dennis is not knightly. If the dennis is stingy and the dennis is not teal then the dennis is not knightly. The dennis does not need the dennis.", "logic": "\nTeal(dennis)\nforall x (Knightly(x) and Teal(x) -> Accredited(x))\nforall x (Stingy(x) and Teal(x) -> Accredited(x))\nforall x (Stingy(x) and Knightly(x) -> Accredited(x))\nforall x (Accredited(x) and Teal(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\nAccredited(dennis) -> Dextrorse(dennis)\nforall x (Teal(x) -> Knightly(x))\nDextrorse(dennis) and Stingy(dennis) -> not Knightly(dennis)\nStingy(dennis) and not Teal(dennis) -> not Knightly(dennis)\n\nnot Needs(dennis, dennis)\n\nnot Needs(dennis, dennis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The marsha is antiguan. All slapstick, antiguan things are olympic. All raptorial, antiguan things are olympic. Cold, slapstick things are olympic. All olympic, antiguan things are abnormal. If the marsha is olympic then the marsha is abnormal. All antiguan things are slapstick. If the marsha is abnormal and the marsha is raptorial then the marsha is not slapstick. If the marsha is raptorial and the marsha is not antiguan then the marsha is not slapstick. The marsha likes the marsha.", "logic": "\nAntiguan(marsha)\nforall x (Slapstick(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Olympic(x))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Olympic(x))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) and Slapstick(x) -> Olympic(x))\nforall x (Olympic(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Abnormal(x))\nOlympic(marsha) -> Abnormal(marsha)\nforall x (Antiguan(x) -> Slapstick(x))\nAbnormal(marsha) and Raptorial(marsha) -> not Slapstick(marsha)\nRaptorial(marsha) and not Antiguan(marsha) -> not Slapstick(marsha)\n\nLikes(marsha, marsha)\n\nLikes(marsha, marsha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "Skipper is lateral. Skipper is slack. Keith is energizing. Keith is rooted. Keith is lateral. Keith is slack. Keith is coinciding. Bernardo is hadean. Bernardo is rooted. Bernardo is literate. Bernardo is slack. Don is energizing. Don is rooted. Don is lateral. Don is literate. Don is slack. All lateral people are rooted. White people are energizing. If someone is energizing then they are lateral. If someone is rooted and lateral then they are coinciding. If someone is lateral then they are energizing. If someone is coinciding then they are hadean. Skipper is lateral.", "logic": "\nLateral(skipper)\nSlack(skipper)\nEnergizing(keith)\nRooted(keith)\nLateral(keith)\nSlack(keith)\nCoinciding(keith)\nHadean(bernardo)\nRooted(bernardo)\nLiterate(bernardo)\nSlack(bernardo)\nEnergizing(don)\nRooted(don)\nLateral(don)\nLiterate(don)\nSlack(don)\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Rooted(x))\nforall x (Coinciding(x) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Energizing(x) -> Lateral(x))\nforall x (Rooted(x) and Lateral(x) -> Coinciding(x))\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Coinciding(x) -> Hadean(x))\n\nLateral(skipper)\n\ntherefore Lateral(skipper)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Brear is siberian. Brear is antonymous. Gloria is plane. Gloria is gnostic. Gloria is siberian. Gloria is antonymous. Gloria is raging. Ami is unlawful. Ami is gnostic. Ami is absolute. Ami is antonymous. Lauryn is plane. Lauryn is gnostic. Lauryn is siberian. Lauryn is absolute. Lauryn is antonymous. All siberian people are gnostic. White people are plane. If someone is plane then they are siberian. If someone is gnostic and siberian then they are raging. If someone is siberian then they are plane. If someone is raging then they are unlawful. Lauryn is not absolute.", "logic": "\nSiberian(brear)\nAntonymous(brear)\nPlane(gloria)\nGnostic(gloria)\nSiberian(gloria)\nAntonymous(gloria)\nRaging(gloria)\nUnlawful(ami)\nGnostic(ami)\nAbsolute(ami)\nAntonymous(ami)\nPlane(lauryn)\nGnostic(lauryn)\nSiberian(lauryn)\nAbsolute(lauryn)\nAntonymous(lauryn)\nforall x (Siberian(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) -> Plane(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) -> Siberian(x))\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Siberian(x) -> Raging(x))\nforall x (Siberian(x) -> Plane(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) -> Unlawful(x))\n\nnot Absolute(lauryn)\n\ntherefore Absolute(lauryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Benjamen is unsymbolic. Benjamen is aegean. Mellie is trapped. Mellie is overfond. Mellie is unsymbolic. Mellie is aegean. Mellie is beaklike. Lanni is epideictic. Lanni is overfond. Lanni is unflavored. Lanni is aegean. Tine is trapped. Tine is overfond. Tine is unsymbolic. Tine is unflavored. Tine is aegean. All unsymbolic people are overfond. White people are trapped. If someone is trapped then they are unsymbolic. If someone is overfond and unsymbolic then they are beaklike. If someone is unsymbolic then they are trapped. If someone is beaklike then they are epideictic. Mellie is epideictic.", "logic": "\nUnsymbolic(benjamen)\nAegean(benjamen)\nTrapped(mellie)\nOverfond(mellie)\nUnsymbolic(mellie)\nAegean(mellie)\nBeaklike(mellie)\nEpideictic(lanni)\nOverfond(lanni)\nUnflavored(lanni)\nAegean(lanni)\nTrapped(tine)\nOverfond(tine)\nUnsymbolic(tine)\nUnflavored(tine)\nAegean(tine)\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Overfond(x))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Trapped(x))\nforall x (Trapped(x) -> Unsymbolic(x))\nforall x (Overfond(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Beaklike(x))\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Trapped(x))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) -> Epideictic(x))\n\nEpideictic(mellie)\n\nBeaklike(mellie) and forall x (Beaklike(x) -> Epideictic(x)) -> therefore Epideictic(mellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Pauline is dioestrual. Pauline is monoploid. Skylar is syllabic. Skylar is saintly. Skylar is dioestrual. Skylar is monoploid. Skylar is unscathed. Emmott is violative. Emmott is saintly. Emmott is adonic. Emmott is monoploid. Waly is syllabic. Waly is saintly. Waly is dioestrual. Waly is adonic. Waly is monoploid. All dioestrual people are saintly. White people are syllabic. If someone is syllabic then they are dioestrual. If someone is saintly and dioestrual then they are unscathed. If someone is dioestrual then they are syllabic. If someone is unscathed then they are violative. Waly is not unscathed.", "logic": "\nDioestrual(pauline)\nMonoploid(pauline)\nSyllabic(skylar)\nSaintly(skylar)\nDioestrual(skylar)\nMonoploid(skylar)\nUnscathed(skylar)\nViolative(emmott)\nSaintly(emmott)\nAdonic(emmott)\nMonoploid(emmott)\nSyllabic(waly)\nSaintly(waly)\nDioestrual(waly)\nAdonic(waly)\nMonoploid(waly)\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Unscathed(x) -> Syllabic(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> Dioestrual(x))\nforall x (Saintly(x) and Dioestrual(x) -> Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) -> Syllabic(x))\nforall x (Unscathed(x) -> Violative(x))\n\nnot Unscathed(waly)\n\nSaintly(waly) and Dioestrual(waly) and forall x (Saintly(x) and Dioestrual(x) -> Unscathed(x)) -> therefore Unscathed(waly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Chelton is weeklong. Chelton is striped. Dari is offsides. Dari is defeasible. Dari is weeklong. Dari is striped. Dari is clxx. Weider is rowdy. Weider is defeasible. Weider is proximate. Weider is striped. Athena is offsides. Athena is defeasible. Athena is weeklong. Athena is proximate. Athena is striped. All weeklong people are defeasible. White people are offsides. If someone is offsides then they are weeklong. If someone is defeasible and weeklong then they are clxx. If someone is weeklong then they are offsides. If someone is clxx then they are rowdy. Athena is rowdy.", "logic": "\nWeeklong(chelton)\nStriped(chelton)\nOffsides(dari)\nDefeasible(dari)\nWeeklong(dari)\nStriped(dari)\nClxx(dari)\nRowdy(weider)\nDefeasible(weider)\nProximate(weider)\nStriped(weider)\nOffsides(athena)\nDefeasible(athena)\nWeeklong(athena)\nProximate(athena)\nStriped(athena)\nforall x (Weeklong(x) -> Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Offsides(x) -> Weeklong(x))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and Weeklong(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Weeklong(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Rowdy(x))\n\nRowdy(athena)\n\nDefeasible(athena) and Weeklong(athena) and forall x (Defeasible(x) and Weeklong(x) -> Clxx(x)) -> therefore Clxx(athena) Clxx(athena) and forall x (Clxx(x) -> Rowdy(x)) -> therefore Rowdy(athena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Jehanna is alular. Jehanna is unfertile. Kriste is idealised. Kriste is engorged. Kriste is alular. Kriste is unfertile. Kriste is acarpelous. Sherry is outbred. Sherry is engorged. Sherry is nonpareil. Sherry is unfertile. Max is idealised. Max is engorged. Max is alular. Max is nonpareil. Max is unfertile. All alular people are engorged. White people are idealised. If someone is idealised then they are alular. If someone is engorged and alular then they are acarpelous. If someone is alular then they are idealised. If someone is acarpelous then they are outbred. Max is not outbred.", "logic": "\nAlular(jehanna)\nUnfertile(jehanna)\nIdealised(kriste)\nEngorged(kriste)\nAlular(kriste)\nUnfertile(kriste)\nAcarpelous(kriste)\nOutbred(sherry)\nEngorged(sherry)\nNonpareil(sherry)\nUnfertile(sherry)\nIdealised(max)\nEngorged(max)\nAlular(max)\nNonpareil(max)\nUnfertile(max)\nforall x (Alular(x) -> Engorged(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Idealised(x) -> Alular(x))\nforall x (Engorged(x) and Alular(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Alular(x) -> Idealised(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Outbred(x))\n\nnot Outbred(max)\n\nEngorged(max) and Alular(max) and forall x (Engorged(x) and Alular(x) -> Acarpelous(x)) -> therefore Acarpelous(max) Acarpelous(max) and forall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Outbred(x)) -> therefore Outbred(max)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Cathleen is phenomenal. Cathleen is stingy. Ginevra is jammed. Ginevra is tenable. Ginevra is phenomenal. Ginevra is stingy. Ginevra is crabbed. Averil is seljuk. Averil is tenable. Averil is arenaceous. Averil is stingy. Hiram is jammed. Hiram is tenable. Hiram is phenomenal. Hiram is arenaceous. Hiram is stingy. All phenomenal people are tenable. White people are jammed. If someone is jammed then they are phenomenal. If someone is tenable and phenomenal then they are crabbed. If someone is phenomenal then they are jammed. If someone is crabbed then they are seljuk. Cathleen is seljuk.", "logic": "\nPhenomenal(cathleen)\nStingy(cathleen)\nJammed(ginevra)\nTenable(ginevra)\nPhenomenal(ginevra)\nStingy(ginevra)\nCrabbed(ginevra)\nSeljuk(averil)\nTenable(averil)\nArenaceous(averil)\nStingy(averil)\nJammed(hiram)\nTenable(hiram)\nPhenomenal(hiram)\nArenaceous(hiram)\nStingy(hiram)\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Jammed(x))\nforall x (Jammed(x) -> Phenomenal(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) and Phenomenal(x) -> Crabbed(x))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Jammed(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Seljuk(x))\n\nSeljuk(cathleen)\n\nPhenomenal(cathleen) and forall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Tenable(x)) -> therefore Tenable(cathleen) Tenable(cathleen) and Phenomenal(cathleen) and forall x (Tenable(x) and Phenomenal(x) -> Crabbed(x)) -> therefore Crabbed(cathleen) Crabbed(cathleen) and forall x (Crabbed(x) -> Seljuk(x)) -> therefore Seljuk(cathleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Corina is blackened. Corina is autoecious. Bellina is secretive. Bellina is holey. Bellina is blackened. Bellina is autoecious. Bellina is upbound. Willow is susurrant. Willow is holey. Willow is cybernetic. Willow is autoecious. Mirabel is secretive. Mirabel is holey. Mirabel is blackened. Mirabel is cybernetic. Mirabel is autoecious. All blackened people are holey. White people are secretive. If someone is secretive then they are blackened. If someone is holey and blackened then they are upbound. If someone is blackened then they are secretive. If someone is upbound then they are susurrant. Corina is not susurrant.", "logic": "\nBlackened(corina)\nAutoecious(corina)\nSecretive(bellina)\nHoley(bellina)\nBlackened(bellina)\nAutoecious(bellina)\nUpbound(bellina)\nSusurrant(willow)\nHoley(willow)\nCybernetic(willow)\nAutoecious(willow)\nSecretive(mirabel)\nHoley(mirabel)\nBlackened(mirabel)\nCybernetic(mirabel)\nAutoecious(mirabel)\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Holey(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Secretive(x) -> Blackened(x))\nforall x (Holey(x) and Blackened(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Susurrant(x))\n\nnot Susurrant(corina)\n\nBlackened(corina) and forall x (Blackened(x) -> Holey(x)) -> therefore Holey(corina) Holey(corina) and Blackened(corina) and forall x (Holey(x) and Blackened(x) -> Upbound(x)) -> therefore Upbound(corina) Upbound(corina) and forall x (Upbound(x) -> Susurrant(x)) -> therefore Susurrant(corina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Sonja is tawdry. Sonja is bouncing. Lisabeth is coiling. Lisabeth is publicised. Lisabeth is tawdry. Lisabeth is bouncing. Lisabeth is suitable. Dulcine is moderne. Dulcine is publicised. Dulcine is proximate. Dulcine is bouncing. Melany is coiling. Melany is publicised. Melany is tawdry. Melany is proximate. Melany is bouncing. All tawdry people are publicised. White people are coiling. If someone is coiling then they are tawdry. If someone is publicised and tawdry then they are suitable. If someone is tawdry then they are coiling. If someone is suitable then they are moderne. Dulcine is not coiling.", "logic": "\nTawdry(sonja)\nBouncing(sonja)\nCoiling(lisabeth)\nPublicised(lisabeth)\nTawdry(lisabeth)\nBouncing(lisabeth)\nSuitable(lisabeth)\nModerne(dulcine)\nPublicised(dulcine)\nProximate(dulcine)\nBouncing(dulcine)\nCoiling(melany)\nPublicised(melany)\nTawdry(melany)\nProximate(melany)\nBouncing(melany)\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> Publicised(x))\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Tawdry(x))\nforall x (Publicised(x) and Tawdry(x) -> Suitable(x))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Moderne(x))\n\nnot Coiling(dulcine)\n\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Coiling(x)) <- forall x (Publicised(x) and Tawdry(x) -> Suitable(x)) <- forall x (Coiling(x) -> Tawdry(x)) <- forall x (Tawdry(x) -> Coiling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Kass is expositive. Kass is warming. Trace is delphic. Trace is spacey. Trace is expositive. Trace is warming. Trace is gaga. Lem is metameric. Lem is spacey. Lem is sitting. Lem is warming. Oneida is delphic. Oneida is spacey. Oneida is expositive. Oneida is sitting. Oneida is warming. All expositive people are spacey. White people are delphic. If someone is delphic then they are expositive. If someone is spacey and expositive then they are gaga. If someone is expositive then they are delphic. If someone is gaga then they are metameric. Lem is gaga.", "logic": "\nExpositive(kass)\nWarming(kass)\nDelphic(trace)\nSpacey(trace)\nExpositive(trace)\nWarming(trace)\nGaga(trace)\nMetameric(lem)\nSpacey(lem)\nSitting(lem)\nWarming(lem)\nDelphic(oneida)\nSpacey(oneida)\nExpositive(oneida)\nSitting(oneida)\nWarming(oneida)\nforall x (Expositive(x) -> Spacey(x))\nforall x (Gaga(x) -> Delphic(x))\nforall x (Delphic(x) -> Expositive(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) and Expositive(x) -> Gaga(x))\nforall x (Expositive(x) -> Delphic(x))\nforall x (Gaga(x) -> Metameric(x))\n\nGaga(lem)\n\nforall x (Spacey(x) and Expositive(x) -> Gaga(x)) <- forall x (Delphic(x) -> Expositive(x)) <- forall x (Gaga(x) -> Delphic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Dominica is unearthly. Dominica is askew. Ofella is bauxitic. Ofella is southmost. Ofella is unearthly. Ofella is askew. Ofella is adpressed. Theresina is prosodic. Theresina is southmost. Theresina is stellate. Theresina is askew. Nannie is bauxitic. Nannie is southmost. Nannie is unearthly. Nannie is stellate. Nannie is askew. All unearthly people are southmost. White people are bauxitic. If someone is bauxitic then they are unearthly. If someone is southmost and unearthly then they are adpressed. If someone is unearthly then they are bauxitic. If someone is adpressed then they are prosodic. Theresina is not unearthly.", "logic": "\nUnearthly(dominica)\nAskew(dominica)\nBauxitic(ofella)\nSouthmost(ofella)\nUnearthly(ofella)\nAskew(ofella)\nAdpressed(ofella)\nProsodic(theresina)\nSouthmost(theresina)\nStellate(theresina)\nAskew(theresina)\nBauxitic(nannie)\nSouthmost(nannie)\nUnearthly(nannie)\nStellate(nannie)\nAskew(nannie)\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Adpressed(x) -> Bauxitic(x))\nforall x (Bauxitic(x) -> Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) and Unearthly(x) -> Adpressed(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> Bauxitic(x))\nforall x (Adpressed(x) -> Prosodic(x))\n\nnot Unearthly(theresina)\n\nforall x (Bauxitic(x) -> Unearthly(x)) <- forall x (Adpressed(x) -> Bauxitic(x)) <- forall x (Southmost(x) and Unearthly(x) -> Adpressed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Annalena is doubled. Annalena is pyrrhic. Harrold is foreign. Harrold is eastern. Harrold is doubled. Harrold is pyrrhic. Harrold is biased. Phoebe is piddling. Phoebe is eastern. Phoebe is redheaded. Phoebe is pyrrhic. Karrie is foreign. Karrie is eastern. Karrie is doubled. Karrie is redheaded. Karrie is pyrrhic. All doubled people are eastern. White people are foreign. If someone is foreign then they are doubled. If someone is eastern and doubled then they are biased. If someone is doubled then they are foreign. If someone is biased then they are piddling. Annalena is redheaded.", "logic": "\nDoubled(annalena)\nPyrrhic(annalena)\nForeign(harrold)\nEastern(harrold)\nDoubled(harrold)\nPyrrhic(harrold)\nBiased(harrold)\nPiddling(phoebe)\nEastern(phoebe)\nRedheaded(phoebe)\nPyrrhic(phoebe)\nForeign(karrie)\nEastern(karrie)\nDoubled(karrie)\nRedheaded(karrie)\nPyrrhic(karrie)\nforall x (Doubled(x) -> Eastern(x))\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Foreign(x) -> Doubled(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) and Doubled(x) -> Biased(x))\nforall x (Doubled(x) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Piddling(x))\n\nRedheaded(annalena)\n\nRedheaded(annalena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "The bengt is unwrapped. The hollyanne renegade the bengt. The gennie renegade the bengt. If something renegade the bengt then it renegade the hollyanne. If something redouble the gennie then the gennie is opencut. If something renegade the gennie and the gennie is unwrapped then the gennie renegade the hollyanne. If the hollyanne renegade the gennie then the hollyanne is uncousinly. If something renegade the hollyanne then it renegade the gennie. If the hollyanne renegade the bengt and the bengt is unwrapped then the bengt is satirical. If the hollyanne redouble the bengt then the hollyanne renegade the gennie. If something is unwrapped and it redouble the bengt then it retool the gennie. The bengt is unwrapped.", "logic": "\nUnwrapped(bengt)\nRenegade(hollyanne, bengt)\nRenegade(gennie, bengt)\nforall x (Renegade(x, bengt) -> Renegade(x, hollyanne))\nforall x (Redouble(x, gennie) -> Opencut(gennie))\nforall x (Renegade(x, gennie) and Unwrapped(gennie) -> Renegade(gennie, hollyanne))\nRenegade(hollyanne, gennie) -> Uncousinly(hollyanne)\nforall x (Renegade(x, hollyanne) -> Renegade(x, gennie))\nRenegade(hollyanne, bengt) and Unwrapped(bengt) -> Satirical(bengt)\nRedouble(hollyanne, bengt) -> Renegade(hollyanne, gennie)\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) and Redouble(x, bengt) -> Retool(x, gennie))\n\nUnwrapped(bengt)\n\ntherefore Unwrapped(bengt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The dela is exemplary. The may feed the dela. The cassandre feed the dela. If something feed the dela then it feed the may. If something sneak the cassandre then the cassandre is foliaged. If something feed the cassandre and the cassandre is exemplary then the cassandre feed the may. If the may feed the cassandre then the may is auriculate. If something feed the may then it feed the cassandre. If the may feed the dela and the dela is exemplary then the dela is highland. If the may sneak the dela then the may feed the cassandre. If something is exemplary and it sneak the dela then it avianise the cassandre. The may does not need the dela.", "logic": "\nExemplary(dela)\nFeed(may, dela)\nFeed(cassandre, dela)\nforall x (Feed(x, dela) -> Feed(x, may))\nforall x (Sneak(x, cassandre) -> Foliaged(cassandre))\nforall x (Feed(x, cassandre) and Exemplary(cassandre) -> Feed(cassandre, may))\nFeed(may, cassandre) -> Auriculate(may)\nforall x (Feed(x, may) -> Feed(x, cassandre))\nFeed(may, dela) and Exemplary(dela) -> Highland(dela)\nSneak(may, dela) -> Feed(may, cassandre)\nforall x (Exemplary(x) and Sneak(x, dela) -> Avianise(x, cassandre))\n\nnot Feed(may, dela)\n\ntherefore Feed(may, dela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The annmaria is luculent. The vena mind the annmaria. The clemente mind the annmaria. If something mind the annmaria then it mind the vena. If something devolve the clemente then the clemente is punitive. If something mind the clemente and the clemente is luculent then the clemente mind the vena. If the vena mind the clemente then the vena is humourous. If something mind the vena then it mind the clemente. If the vena mind the annmaria and the annmaria is luculent then the annmaria is affixial. If the vena devolve the annmaria then the vena mind the clemente. If something is luculent and it devolve the annmaria then it hock the clemente. The annmaria is affixial.", "logic": "\nLuculent(annmaria)\nMind(vena, annmaria)\nMind(clemente, annmaria)\nforall x (Mind(x, annmaria) -> Mind(x, vena))\nforall x (Devolve(x, clemente) -> Punitive(clemente))\nforall x (Mind(x, clemente) and Luculent(clemente) -> Mind(clemente, vena))\nMind(vena, clemente) -> Humourous(vena)\nforall x (Mind(x, vena) -> Mind(x, clemente))\nMind(vena, annmaria) and Luculent(annmaria) -> Affixial(annmaria)\nDevolve(vena, annmaria) -> Mind(vena, clemente)\nforall x (Luculent(x) and Devolve(x, annmaria) -> Hock(x, clemente))\n\nAffixial(annmaria)\n\nMind(vena, annmaria) and Luculent(annmaria) and Mind(vena, annmaria) and Luculent(annmaria) -> Affixial(annmaria) -> therefore Affixial(annmaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The gladis is ladylike. The michaela whelk the gladis. The desaree whelk the gladis. If something whelk the gladis then it whelk the michaela. If something evaporate the desaree then the desaree is exogenous. If something whelk the desaree and the desaree is ladylike then the desaree whelk the michaela. If the michaela whelk the desaree then the michaela is keen. If something whelk the michaela then it whelk the desaree. If the michaela whelk the gladis and the gladis is ladylike then the gladis is notional. If the michaela evaporate the gladis then the michaela whelk the desaree. If something is ladylike and it evaporate the gladis then it crop the desaree. The desaree does not need the michaela.", "logic": "\nLadylike(gladis)\nWhelk(michaela, gladis)\nWhelk(desaree, gladis)\nforall x (Whelk(x, gladis) -> Whelk(x, michaela))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, desaree) -> Exogenous(desaree))\nforall x (Whelk(x, desaree) and Ladylike(desaree) -> Whelk(desaree, michaela))\nWhelk(michaela, desaree) -> Keen(michaela)\nforall x (Whelk(x, michaela) -> Whelk(x, desaree))\nWhelk(michaela, gladis) and Ladylike(gladis) -> Notional(gladis)\nEvaporate(michaela, gladis) -> Whelk(michaela, desaree)\nforall x (Ladylike(x) and Evaporate(x, gladis) -> Crop(x, desaree))\n\nnot Whelk(desaree, michaela)\n\nWhelk(desaree, gladis) and forall x (Whelk(x, gladis) -> Whelk(x, michaela)) -> therefore Whelk(desaree, michaela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The elvira is unextended. The reed vitaminise the elvira. The caril vitaminise the elvira. If something vitaminise the elvira then it vitaminise the reed. If something burgeon the caril then the caril is principal. If something vitaminise the caril and the caril is unextended then the caril vitaminise the reed. If the reed vitaminise the caril then the reed is helpful. If something vitaminise the reed then it vitaminise the caril. If the reed vitaminise the elvira and the elvira is unextended then the elvira is grassy. If the reed burgeon the elvira then the reed vitaminise the caril. If something is unextended and it burgeon the elvira then it renounce the caril. The caril vitaminise the caril.", "logic": "\nUnextended(elvira)\nVitaminise(reed, elvira)\nVitaminise(caril, elvira)\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, elvira) -> Vitaminise(x, reed))\nforall x (Burgeon(x, caril) -> Principal(caril))\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, caril) and Unextended(caril) -> Vitaminise(caril, reed))\nVitaminise(reed, caril) -> Helpful(reed)\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, reed) -> Vitaminise(x, caril))\nVitaminise(reed, elvira) and Unextended(elvira) -> Grassy(elvira)\nBurgeon(reed, elvira) -> Vitaminise(reed, caril)\nforall x (Unextended(x) and Burgeon(x, elvira) -> Renounce(x, caril))\n\nVitaminise(caril, caril)\n\nVitaminise(caril, elvira) and forall x (Vitaminise(x, elvira) -> Vitaminise(x, reed)) -> therefore Vitaminise(caril, reed) Vitaminise(caril, reed) and forall x (Vitaminise(x, reed) -> Vitaminise(x, caril)) -> therefore Vitaminise(caril, caril)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The layla is alkylic. The cathie squash the layla. The hirsch squash the layla. If something squash the layla then it squash the cathie. If something steer the hirsch then the hirsch is peremptory. If something squash the hirsch and the hirsch is alkylic then the hirsch squash the cathie. If the cathie squash the hirsch then the cathie is base. If something squash the cathie then it squash the hirsch. If the cathie squash the layla and the layla is alkylic then the layla is zoonotic. If the cathie steer the layla then the cathie squash the hirsch. If something is alkylic and it steer the layla then it seaplane the hirsch. The cathie does not need the hirsch.", "logic": "\nAlkylic(layla)\nSquash(cathie, layla)\nSquash(hirsch, layla)\nforall x (Squash(x, layla) -> Squash(x, cathie))\nforall x (Steer(x, hirsch) -> Peremptory(hirsch))\nforall x (Squash(x, hirsch) and Alkylic(hirsch) -> Squash(hirsch, cathie))\nSquash(cathie, hirsch) -> Base(cathie)\nforall x (Squash(x, cathie) -> Squash(x, hirsch))\nSquash(cathie, layla) and Alkylic(layla) -> Zoonotic(layla)\nSteer(cathie, layla) -> Squash(cathie, hirsch)\nforall x (Alkylic(x) and Steer(x, layla) -> Seaplane(x, hirsch))\n\nnot Squash(cathie, hirsch)\n\nSquash(cathie, layla) and forall x (Squash(x, layla) -> Squash(x, cathie)) -> therefore Squash(cathie, cathie) Squash(cathie, cathie) and forall x (Squash(x, cathie) -> Squash(x, hirsch)) -> therefore Squash(cathie, hirsch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The otto is sanious. The julian caddie the otto. The darsie caddie the otto. If something caddie the otto then it caddie the julian. If something contend the darsie then the darsie is soggy. If something caddie the darsie and the darsie is sanious then the darsie caddie the julian. If the julian caddie the darsie then the julian is jowly. If something caddie the julian then it caddie the darsie. If the julian caddie the otto and the otto is sanious then the otto is amebous. If the julian contend the otto then the julian caddie the darsie. If something is sanious and it contend the otto then it sandpaper the darsie. The julian is jowly.", "logic": "\nSanious(otto)\nCaddie(julian, otto)\nCaddie(darsie, otto)\nforall x (Caddie(x, otto) -> Caddie(x, julian))\nforall x (Contend(x, darsie) -> Soggy(darsie))\nforall x (Caddie(x, darsie) and Sanious(darsie) -> Caddie(darsie, julian))\nCaddie(julian, darsie) -> Jowly(julian)\nforall x (Caddie(x, julian) -> Caddie(x, darsie))\nCaddie(julian, otto) and Sanious(otto) -> Amebous(otto)\nContend(julian, otto) -> Caddie(julian, darsie)\nforall x (Sanious(x) and Contend(x, otto) -> Sandpaper(x, darsie))\n\nJowly(julian)\n\nCaddie(julian, otto) and forall x (Caddie(x, otto) -> Caddie(x, julian)) -> therefore Caddie(julian, julian) Caddie(julian, julian) and forall x (Caddie(x, julian) -> Caddie(x, darsie)) -> therefore Caddie(julian, darsie) Caddie(julian, darsie) and Caddie(julian, darsie) -> Jowly(julian) -> therefore Jowly(julian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The paulie is diagonal. The deana cicatrise the paulie. The beulah cicatrise the paulie. If something cicatrise the paulie then it cicatrise the deana. If something outfit the beulah then the beulah is inapt. If something cicatrise the beulah and the beulah is diagonal then the beulah cicatrise the deana. If the deana cicatrise the beulah then the deana is cetacean. If something cicatrise the deana then it cicatrise the beulah. If the deana cicatrise the paulie and the paulie is diagonal then the paulie is unwilled. If the deana outfit the paulie then the deana cicatrise the beulah. If something is diagonal and it outfit the paulie then it delimitate the beulah. The deana is not cetacean.", "logic": "\nDiagonal(paulie)\nCicatrise(deana, paulie)\nCicatrise(beulah, paulie)\nforall x (Cicatrise(x, paulie) -> Cicatrise(x, deana))\nforall x (Outfit(x, beulah) -> Inapt(beulah))\nforall x (Cicatrise(x, beulah) and Diagonal(beulah) -> Cicatrise(beulah, deana))\nCicatrise(deana, beulah) -> Cetacean(deana)\nforall x (Cicatrise(x, deana) -> Cicatrise(x, beulah))\nCicatrise(deana, paulie) and Diagonal(paulie) -> Unwilled(paulie)\nOutfit(deana, paulie) -> Cicatrise(deana, beulah)\nforall x (Diagonal(x) and Outfit(x, paulie) -> Delimitate(x, beulah))\n\nnot Cetacean(deana)\n\nCicatrise(deana, paulie) and forall x (Cicatrise(x, paulie) -> Cicatrise(x, deana)) -> therefore Cicatrise(deana, deana) Cicatrise(deana, deana) and forall x (Cicatrise(x, deana) -> Cicatrise(x, beulah)) -> therefore Cicatrise(deana, beulah) Cicatrise(deana, beulah) and Cicatrise(deana, beulah) -> Cetacean(deana) -> therefore Cetacean(deana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The carlynne is tributary. The hart overreact the carlynne. The jervis overreact the carlynne. If something overreact the carlynne then it overreact the hart. If something belie the jervis then the jervis is cuttable. If something overreact the jervis and the jervis is tributary then the jervis overreact the hart. If the hart overreact the jervis then the hart is discalced. If something overreact the hart then it overreact the jervis. If the hart overreact the carlynne and the carlynne is tributary then the carlynne is downlike. If the hart belie the carlynne then the hart overreact the jervis. If something is tributary and it belie the carlynne then it meter the jervis. The carlynne does not need the jervis.", "logic": "\nTributary(carlynne)\nOverreact(hart, carlynne)\nOverreact(jervis, carlynne)\nforall x (Overreact(x, carlynne) -> Overreact(x, hart))\nforall x (Belie(x, jervis) -> Cuttable(jervis))\nforall x (Overreact(x, jervis) and Tributary(jervis) -> Overreact(jervis, hart))\nOverreact(hart, jervis) -> Discalced(hart)\nforall x (Overreact(x, hart) -> Overreact(x, jervis))\nOverreact(hart, carlynne) and Tributary(carlynne) -> Downlike(carlynne)\nBelie(hart, carlynne) -> Overreact(hart, jervis)\nforall x (Tributary(x) and Belie(x, carlynne) -> Meter(x, jervis))\n\nnot Overreact(carlynne, jervis)\n\nforall x (Overreact(x, hart) -> Overreact(x, jervis)) <- forall x (Overreact(x, carlynne) -> Overreact(x, hart)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The heidi is noiseless. The georgine raffle the heidi. The samara raffle the heidi. If something raffle the heidi then it raffle the georgine. If something exposit the samara then the samara is inwrought. If something raffle the samara and the samara is noiseless then the samara raffle the georgine. If the georgine raffle the samara then the georgine is jaded. If something raffle the georgine then it raffle the samara. If the georgine raffle the heidi and the heidi is noiseless then the heidi is glycogenic. If the georgine exposit the heidi then the georgine raffle the samara. If something is noiseless and it exposit the heidi then it bastinado the samara. The heidi bastinado the samara.", "logic": "\nNoiseless(heidi)\nRaffle(georgine, heidi)\nRaffle(samara, heidi)\nforall x (Raffle(x, heidi) -> Raffle(x, georgine))\nforall x (Exposit(x, samara) -> Inwrought(samara))\nforall x (Raffle(x, samara) and Noiseless(samara) -> Raffle(samara, georgine))\nRaffle(georgine, samara) -> Jaded(georgine)\nforall x (Raffle(x, georgine) -> Raffle(x, samara))\nRaffle(georgine, heidi) and Noiseless(heidi) -> Glycogenic(heidi)\nExposit(georgine, heidi) -> Raffle(georgine, samara)\nforall x (Noiseless(x) and Exposit(x, heidi) -> Bastinado(x, samara))\n\nBastinado(heidi, samara)\n\nforall x (Noiseless(x) and Exposit(x, heidi) -> Bastinado(x, samara)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The clayborn is hooflike. The edithe measure the clayborn. The amory measure the clayborn. If something measure the clayborn then it measure the edithe. If something randomise the amory then the amory is snaky. If something measure the amory and the amory is hooflike then the amory measure the edithe. If the edithe measure the amory then the edithe is antarctic. If something measure the edithe then it measure the amory. If the edithe measure the clayborn and the clayborn is hooflike then the clayborn is zygomatic. If the edithe randomise the clayborn then the edithe measure the amory. If something is hooflike and it randomise the clayborn then it rarefy the amory. The edithe does not like the amory.", "logic": "\nHooflike(clayborn)\nMeasure(edithe, clayborn)\nMeasure(amory, clayborn)\nforall x (Measure(x, clayborn) -> Measure(x, edithe))\nforall x (Randomise(x, amory) -> Snaky(amory))\nforall x (Measure(x, amory) and Hooflike(amory) -> Measure(amory, edithe))\nMeasure(edithe, amory) -> Antarctic(edithe)\nforall x (Measure(x, edithe) -> Measure(x, amory))\nMeasure(edithe, clayborn) and Hooflike(clayborn) -> Zygomatic(clayborn)\nRandomise(edithe, clayborn) -> Measure(edithe, amory)\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and Randomise(x, clayborn) -> Rarefy(x, amory))\n\nnot Rarefy(edithe, amory)\n\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and Randomise(x, clayborn) -> Rarefy(x, amory)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The brittan is spindly. The veronique recrudesce the brittan. The wiatt recrudesce the brittan. If something recrudesce the brittan then it recrudesce the veronique. If something divulge the wiatt then the wiatt is liquefied. If something recrudesce the wiatt and the wiatt is spindly then the wiatt recrudesce the veronique. If the veronique recrudesce the wiatt then the veronique is flighted. If something recrudesce the veronique then it recrudesce the wiatt. If the veronique recrudesce the brittan and the brittan is spindly then the brittan is boggy. If the veronique divulge the brittan then the veronique recrudesce the wiatt. If something is spindly and it divulge the brittan then it backtrack the wiatt. The wiatt backtrack the wiatt.", "logic": "\nSpindly(brittan)\nRecrudesce(veronique, brittan)\nRecrudesce(wiatt, brittan)\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, brittan) -> Recrudesce(x, veronique))\nforall x (Divulge(x, wiatt) -> Liquefied(wiatt))\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, wiatt) and Spindly(wiatt) -> Recrudesce(wiatt, veronique))\nRecrudesce(veronique, wiatt) -> Flighted(veronique)\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, veronique) -> Recrudesce(x, wiatt))\nRecrudesce(veronique, brittan) and Spindly(brittan) -> Boggy(brittan)\nDivulge(veronique, brittan) -> Recrudesce(veronique, wiatt)\nforall x (Spindly(x) and Divulge(x, brittan) -> Backtrack(x, wiatt))\n\nBacktrack(wiatt, wiatt)\n\nforall x (Spindly(x) and Divulge(x, brittan) -> Backtrack(x, wiatt)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The kendra is sextuple. The hamid trisect the kendra. The waiter trisect the kendra. If something trisect the kendra then it trisect the hamid. If something camouflage the waiter then the waiter is enlivened. If something trisect the waiter and the waiter is sextuple then the waiter trisect the hamid. If the hamid trisect the waiter then the hamid is exuberant. If something trisect the hamid then it trisect the waiter. If the hamid trisect the kendra and the kendra is sextuple then the kendra is acoustical. If the hamid camouflage the kendra then the hamid trisect the waiter. If something is sextuple and it camouflage the kendra then it consociate the waiter. The hamid does not chase the waiter.", "logic": "\nSextuple(kendra)\nTrisect(hamid, kendra)\nTrisect(waiter, kendra)\nforall x (Trisect(x, kendra) -> Trisect(x, hamid))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, waiter) -> Enlivened(waiter))\nforall x (Trisect(x, waiter) and Sextuple(waiter) -> Trisect(waiter, hamid))\nTrisect(hamid, waiter) -> Exuberant(hamid)\nforall x (Trisect(x, hamid) -> Trisect(x, waiter))\nTrisect(hamid, kendra) and Sextuple(kendra) -> Acoustical(kendra)\nCamouflage(hamid, kendra) -> Trisect(hamid, waiter)\nforall x (Sextuple(x) and Camouflage(x, kendra) -> Consociate(x, waiter))\n\nnot Camouflage(hamid, waiter)\n\nnot Camouflage(hamid, waiter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The woody is bipolar. The rea adjure the woody. The irene adjure the woody. If something adjure the woody then it adjure the rea. If something debark the irene then the irene is nitrous. If something adjure the irene and the irene is bipolar then the irene adjure the rea. If the rea adjure the irene then the rea is alchemic. If something adjure the rea then it adjure the irene. If the rea adjure the woody and the woody is bipolar then the woody is contextual. If the rea debark the woody then the rea adjure the irene. If something is bipolar and it debark the woody then it still the irene. The irene is cold.", "logic": "\nBipolar(woody)\nAdjure(rea, woody)\nAdjure(irene, woody)\nforall x (Adjure(x, woody) -> Adjure(x, rea))\nforall x (Debark(x, irene) -> Nitrous(irene))\nforall x (Adjure(x, irene) and Bipolar(irene) -> Adjure(irene, rea))\nAdjure(rea, irene) -> Alchemic(rea)\nforall x (Adjure(x, rea) -> Adjure(x, irene))\nAdjure(rea, woody) and Bipolar(woody) -> Contextual(woody)\nDebark(rea, woody) -> Adjure(rea, irene)\nforall x (Bipolar(x) and Debark(x, woody) -> Still(x, irene))\n\nCold(irene)\n\nCold(irene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The shandy is fourteen. The maura replete the shandy. The charmaine replete the shandy. If something replete the shandy then it replete the maura. If something vary the charmaine then the charmaine is accurate. If something replete the charmaine and the charmaine is fourteen then the charmaine replete the maura. If the maura replete the charmaine then the maura is pejorative. If something replete the maura then it replete the charmaine. If the maura replete the shandy and the shandy is fourteen then the shandy is bowelless. If the maura vary the shandy then the maura replete the charmaine. If something is fourteen and it vary the shandy then it revet the charmaine. The shandy is not pejorative.", "logic": "\nFourteen(shandy)\nReplete(maura, shandy)\nReplete(charmaine, shandy)\nforall x (Replete(x, shandy) -> Replete(x, maura))\nforall x (Vary(x, charmaine) -> Accurate(charmaine))\nforall x (Replete(x, charmaine) and Fourteen(charmaine) -> Replete(charmaine, maura))\nReplete(maura, charmaine) -> Pejorative(maura)\nforall x (Replete(x, maura) -> Replete(x, charmaine))\nReplete(maura, shandy) and Fourteen(shandy) -> Bowelless(shandy)\nVary(maura, shandy) -> Replete(maura, charmaine)\nforall x (Fourteen(x) and Vary(x, shandy) -> Revet(x, charmaine))\n\nnot Pejorative(shandy)\n\nnot Pejorative(shandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The tabbi is lowbred. The erhard cockle the tabbi. The franklyn cockle the tabbi. If something cockle the tabbi then it cockle the erhard. If something syncretize the franklyn then the franklyn is unmixable. If something cockle the franklyn and the franklyn is lowbred then the franklyn cockle the erhard. If the erhard cockle the franklyn then the erhard is curvy. If something cockle the erhard then it cockle the franklyn. If the erhard cockle the tabbi and the tabbi is lowbred then the tabbi is atheist. If the erhard syncretize the tabbi then the erhard cockle the franklyn. If something is lowbred and it syncretize the tabbi then it slaver the franklyn. The franklyn slaver the tabbi.", "logic": "\nLowbred(tabbi)\nCockle(erhard, tabbi)\nCockle(franklyn, tabbi)\nforall x (Cockle(x, tabbi) -> Cockle(x, erhard))\nforall x (Syncretize(x, franklyn) -> Unmixable(franklyn))\nforall x (Cockle(x, franklyn) and Lowbred(franklyn) -> Cockle(franklyn, erhard))\nCockle(erhard, franklyn) -> Curvy(erhard)\nforall x (Cockle(x, erhard) -> Cockle(x, franklyn))\nCockle(erhard, tabbi) and Lowbred(tabbi) -> Atheist(tabbi)\nSyncretize(erhard, tabbi) -> Cockle(erhard, franklyn)\nforall x (Lowbred(x) and Syncretize(x, tabbi) -> Slaver(x, franklyn))\n\nSlaver(franklyn, tabbi)\n\nSlaver(franklyn, tabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "Jonah is insentient. Jonah is separated. Garry is insentient. Garry is separated. Garry is venerable. Jennings is slighting. Jennings is flecked. All insentient, latest things are interred. If Jennings is latest and Jennings is flecked then Jennings is insentient. Blue, flecked things are latest. Jonah is insentient.", "logic": "\nInsentient(jonah)\nSeparated(jonah)\nInsentient(garry)\nSeparated(garry)\nVenerable(garry)\nSlighting(jennings)\nFlecked(jennings)\nforall x (Insentient(x) and Latest(x) -> Interred(x))\nLatest(jennings) and Flecked(jennings) -> Insentient(jennings)\nforall x (Slighting(x) and Flecked(x) -> Latest(x))\n\nInsentient(jonah)\n\ntherefore Insentient(jonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Elsie is protective. Elsie is roundabout. Margit is protective. Margit is roundabout. Margit is congenital. Brynn is bituminous. Brynn is theoretic. All protective, armillary things are topknotted. If Brynn is armillary and Brynn is theoretic then Brynn is protective. Blue, theoretic things are armillary. Margit is not congenital.", "logic": "\nProtective(elsie)\nRoundabout(elsie)\nProtective(margit)\nRoundabout(margit)\nCongenital(margit)\nBituminous(brynn)\nTheoretic(brynn)\nforall x (Protective(x) and Armillary(x) -> Topknotted(x))\nArmillary(brynn) and Theoretic(brynn) -> Protective(brynn)\nforall x (Bituminous(x) and Theoretic(x) -> Armillary(x))\n\nnot Congenital(margit)\n\ntherefore Congenital(margit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Celle is neurogenic. Celle is sanative. Hedy is neurogenic. Hedy is sanative. Hedy is beady. Kee is averse. Kee is eukaryotic. All neurogenic, recovered things are horned. If Kee is recovered and Kee is eukaryotic then Kee is neurogenic. Blue, eukaryotic things are recovered. Kee is recovered.", "logic": "\nNeurogenic(celle)\nSanative(celle)\nNeurogenic(hedy)\nSanative(hedy)\nBeady(hedy)\nAverse(kee)\nEukaryotic(kee)\nforall x (Neurogenic(x) and Recovered(x) -> Horned(x))\nRecovered(kee) and Eukaryotic(kee) -> Neurogenic(kee)\nforall x (Averse(x) and Eukaryotic(x) -> Recovered(x))\n\nRecovered(kee)\n\nAverse(kee) and Eukaryotic(kee) and forall x (Averse(x) and Eukaryotic(x) -> Recovered(x)) -> therefore Recovered(kee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Roger is priceless. Roger is dyspneic. Travers is priceless. Travers is dyspneic. Travers is consistent. Camel is spinnbar. Camel is idealised. All priceless, feverous things are disparate. If Camel is feverous and Camel is idealised then Camel is priceless. Blue, idealised things are feverous. Camel is not feverous.", "logic": "\nPriceless(roger)\nDyspneic(roger)\nPriceless(travers)\nDyspneic(travers)\nConsistent(travers)\nSpinnbar(camel)\nIdealised(camel)\nforall x (Priceless(x) and Feverous(x) -> Disparate(x))\nFeverous(camel) and Idealised(camel) -> Priceless(camel)\nforall x (Spinnbar(x) and Idealised(x) -> Feverous(x))\n\nnot Feverous(camel)\n\nSpinnbar(camel) and Idealised(camel) and forall x (Spinnbar(x) and Idealised(x) -> Feverous(x)) -> therefore Feverous(camel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Nancey is untiring. Nancey is inherent. Allsun is untiring. Allsun is inherent. Allsun is sorrowing. Patrick is woollen. Patrick is demolished. All untiring, enforced things are caseous. If Patrick is enforced and Patrick is demolished then Patrick is untiring. Blue, demolished things are enforced. Patrick is untiring.", "logic": "\nUntiring(nancey)\nInherent(nancey)\nUntiring(allsun)\nInherent(allsun)\nSorrowing(allsun)\nWoollen(patrick)\nDemolished(patrick)\nforall x (Untiring(x) and Enforced(x) -> Caseous(x))\nEnforced(patrick) and Demolished(patrick) -> Untiring(patrick)\nforall x (Woollen(x) and Demolished(x) -> Enforced(x))\n\nUntiring(patrick)\n\nWoollen(patrick) and Demolished(patrick) and forall x (Woollen(x) and Demolished(x) -> Enforced(x)) -> therefore Enforced(patrick) Enforced(patrick) and Demolished(patrick) and Enforced(patrick) and Demolished(patrick) -> Untiring(patrick) -> therefore Untiring(patrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Welby is xxiii. Welby is lashing. Marmaduke is xxiii. Marmaduke is lashing. Marmaduke is yankee. Rochell is frowzy. Rochell is wideband. All xxiii, subacute things are donnish. If Rochell is subacute and Rochell is wideband then Rochell is xxiii. Blue, wideband things are subacute. Rochell is not xxiii.", "logic": "\nXxiii(welby)\nLashing(welby)\nXxiii(marmaduke)\nLashing(marmaduke)\nYankee(marmaduke)\nFrowzy(rochell)\nWideband(rochell)\nforall x (Xxiii(x) and Subacute(x) -> Donnish(x))\nSubacute(rochell) and Wideband(rochell) -> Xxiii(rochell)\nforall x (Frowzy(x) and Wideband(x) -> Subacute(x))\n\nnot Xxiii(rochell)\n\nFrowzy(rochell) and Wideband(rochell) and forall x (Frowzy(x) and Wideband(x) -> Subacute(x)) -> therefore Subacute(rochell) Subacute(rochell) and Wideband(rochell) and Subacute(rochell) and Wideband(rochell) -> Xxiii(rochell) -> therefore Xxiii(rochell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Elise is dicey. Elise is abashed. Thurstan is dicey. Thurstan is abashed. Thurstan is eldritch. Melony is repeated. Melony is abatable. All dicey, opaline things are multistory. If Melony is opaline and Melony is abatable then Melony is dicey. Blue, abatable things are opaline. Melony is multistory.", "logic": "\nDicey(elise)\nAbashed(elise)\nDicey(thurstan)\nAbashed(thurstan)\nEldritch(thurstan)\nRepeated(melony)\nAbatable(melony)\nforall x (Dicey(x) and Opaline(x) -> Multistory(x))\nOpaline(melony) and Abatable(melony) -> Dicey(melony)\nforall x (Repeated(x) and Abatable(x) -> Opaline(x))\n\nMultistory(melony)\n\nRepeated(melony) and Abatable(melony) and forall x (Repeated(x) and Abatable(x) -> Opaline(x)) -> therefore Opaline(melony) Opaline(melony) and Abatable(melony) and Opaline(melony) and Abatable(melony) -> Dicey(melony) -> therefore Dicey(melony) Repeated(melony) and Abatable(melony) and forall x (Repeated(x) and Abatable(x) -> Opaline(x)) -> therefore Opaline(melony) Dicey(melony) and Opaline(melony) and forall x (Dicey(x) and Opaline(x) -> Multistory(x)) -> therefore Multistory(melony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Lucila is proof. Lucila is viscid. Lenna is proof. Lenna is viscid. Lenna is faineant. Milli is tigerish. Milli is uncoerced. All proof, bathetic things are belated. If Milli is bathetic and Milli is uncoerced then Milli is proof. Blue, uncoerced things are bathetic. Milli is not belated.", "logic": "\nProof(lucila)\nViscid(lucila)\nProof(lenna)\nViscid(lenna)\nFaineant(lenna)\nTigerish(milli)\nUncoerced(milli)\nforall x (Proof(x) and Bathetic(x) -> Belated(x))\nBathetic(milli) and Uncoerced(milli) -> Proof(milli)\nforall x (Tigerish(x) and Uncoerced(x) -> Bathetic(x))\n\nnot Belated(milli)\n\nTigerish(milli) and Uncoerced(milli) and forall x (Tigerish(x) and Uncoerced(x) -> Bathetic(x)) -> therefore Bathetic(milli) Bathetic(milli) and Uncoerced(milli) and Bathetic(milli) and Uncoerced(milli) -> Proof(milli) -> therefore Proof(milli) Tigerish(milli) and Uncoerced(milli) and forall x (Tigerish(x) and Uncoerced(x) -> Bathetic(x)) -> therefore Bathetic(milli) Proof(milli) and Bathetic(milli) and forall x (Proof(x) and Bathetic(x) -> Belated(x)) -> therefore Belated(milli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Renata is publicised. Renata is laden. Joellyn is publicised. Joellyn is laden. Joellyn is digestible. Osbourne is alveolate. Osbourne is modern. All publicised, changeless things are rocky. If Osbourne is changeless and Osbourne is modern then Osbourne is publicised. Blue, modern things are changeless. Joellyn is not rocky.", "logic": "\nPublicised(renata)\nLaden(renata)\nPublicised(joellyn)\nLaden(joellyn)\nDigestible(joellyn)\nAlveolate(osbourne)\nModern(osbourne)\nforall x (Publicised(x) and Changeless(x) -> Rocky(x))\nChangeless(osbourne) and Modern(osbourne) -> Publicised(osbourne)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) and Modern(x) -> Changeless(x))\n\nnot Rocky(joellyn)\n\nforall x (Publicised(x) and Changeless(x) -> Rocky(x)) <- forall x (Alveolate(x) and Modern(x) -> Changeless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Julian is overawed. Julian is boxy. Nero is overawed. Nero is boxy. Nero is meshugge. Athena is gloveless. Athena is vasomotor. All overawed, taxpaying things are coherent. If Athena is taxpaying and Athena is vasomotor then Athena is overawed. Blue, vasomotor things are taxpaying. Julian is taxpaying.", "logic": "\nOverawed(julian)\nBoxy(julian)\nOverawed(nero)\nBoxy(nero)\nMeshugge(nero)\nGloveless(athena)\nVasomotor(athena)\nforall x (Overawed(x) and Taxpaying(x) -> Coherent(x))\nTaxpaying(athena) and Vasomotor(athena) -> Overawed(athena)\nforall x (Gloveless(x) and Vasomotor(x) -> Taxpaying(x))\n\nTaxpaying(julian)\n\nforall x (Gloveless(x) and Vasomotor(x) -> Taxpaying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Juanita is mouselike. Juanita is axenic. Mervin is mouselike. Mervin is axenic. Mervin is horrified. Agnes is charnel. Agnes is sorted. All mouselike, ropey things are bronze. If Agnes is ropey and Agnes is sorted then Agnes is mouselike. Blue, sorted things are ropey. Juanita is not bronze.", "logic": "\nMouselike(juanita)\nAxenic(juanita)\nMouselike(mervin)\nAxenic(mervin)\nHorrified(mervin)\nCharnel(agnes)\nSorted(agnes)\nforall x (Mouselike(x) and Ropey(x) -> Bronze(x))\nRopey(agnes) and Sorted(agnes) -> Mouselike(agnes)\nforall x (Charnel(x) and Sorted(x) -> Ropey(x))\n\nnot Bronze(juanita)\n\nforall x (Mouselike(x) and Ropey(x) -> Bronze(x)) <- forall x (Charnel(x) and Sorted(x) -> Ropey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Ina is snide. Ina is petrifying. Mabel is snide. Mabel is petrifying. Mabel is bewildered. Clio is sexless. Clio is marbleised. All snide, soft things are fogbound. If Clio is soft and Clio is marbleised then Clio is snide. Blue, marbleised things are soft. Mabel is soft.", "logic": "\nSnide(ina)\nPetrifying(ina)\nSnide(mabel)\nPetrifying(mabel)\nBewildered(mabel)\nSexless(clio)\nMarbleised(clio)\nforall x (Snide(x) and Soft(x) -> Fogbound(x))\nSoft(clio) and Marbleised(clio) -> Snide(clio)\nforall x (Sexless(x) and Marbleised(x) -> Soft(x))\n\nSoft(mabel)\n\nforall x (Sexless(x) and Marbleised(x) -> Soft(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Natalina is lebanese. Natalina is flinty. Marisa is lebanese. Marisa is flinty. Marisa is skintight. Hannah is blastular. Hannah is center. All lebanese, swingy things are initiatory. If Hannah is swingy and Hannah is center then Hannah is lebanese. Blue, center things are swingy. Natalina is not blastular.", "logic": "\nLebanese(natalina)\nFlinty(natalina)\nLebanese(marisa)\nFlinty(marisa)\nSkintight(marisa)\nBlastular(hannah)\nCenter(hannah)\nforall x (Lebanese(x) and Swingy(x) -> Initiatory(x))\nSwingy(hannah) and Center(hannah) -> Lebanese(hannah)\nforall x (Blastular(x) and Center(x) -> Swingy(x))\n\nnot Blastular(natalina)\n\nnot Blastular(natalina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Bernhard is perdurable. Bernhard is eradicable. Sting is perdurable. Sting is eradicable. Sting is activistic. Cliff is healed. Cliff is splendid. All perdurable, inerrable things are hobnailed. If Cliff is inerrable and Cliff is splendid then Cliff is perdurable. Blue, splendid things are inerrable. Cliff is eradicable.", "logic": "\nPerdurable(bernhard)\nEradicable(bernhard)\nPerdurable(sting)\nEradicable(sting)\nActivistic(sting)\nHealed(cliff)\nSplendid(cliff)\nforall x (Perdurable(x) and Inerrable(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nInerrable(cliff) and Splendid(cliff) -> Perdurable(cliff)\nforall x (Healed(x) and Splendid(x) -> Inerrable(x))\n\nEradicable(cliff)\n\nEradicable(cliff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Agata is torn. Agata is overstrung. Lina is torn. Lina is overstrung. Lina is buffoonish. Robena is unspoiled. Robena is metrical. All torn, lugubrious things are boughed. If Robena is lugubrious and Robena is metrical then Robena is torn. Blue, metrical things are lugubrious. Robena is not buffoonish.", "logic": "\nTorn(agata)\nOverstrung(agata)\nTorn(lina)\nOverstrung(lina)\nBuffoonish(lina)\nUnspoiled(robena)\nMetrical(robena)\nforall x (Torn(x) and Lugubrious(x) -> Boughed(x))\nLugubrious(robena) and Metrical(robena) -> Torn(robena)\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) and Metrical(x) -> Lugubrious(x))\n\nnot Buffoonish(robena)\n\nnot Buffoonish(robena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Xylia is faithful. Xylia is unsated. Iain is faithful. Iain is unsated. Iain is cabalistic. Kassi is masted. Kassi is alpha. All faithful, profligate things are dovish. If Kassi is profligate and Kassi is alpha then Kassi is faithful. Blue, alpha things are profligate. Xylia is cabalistic.", "logic": "\nFaithful(xylia)\nUnsated(xylia)\nFaithful(iain)\nUnsated(iain)\nCabalistic(iain)\nMasted(kassi)\nAlpha(kassi)\nforall x (Faithful(x) and Profligate(x) -> Dovish(x))\nProfligate(kassi) and Alpha(kassi) -> Faithful(kassi)\nforall x (Masted(x) and Alpha(x) -> Profligate(x))\n\nCabalistic(xylia)\n\nCabalistic(xylia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Christin is bowery. Christin is not sceptred. Isis is bowery. Isis is sceptred. Isis is not puranic. Isis is loth. Isis is not straplike. Roze is unlocked. Roze is common. Roze is straplike. If something is bowery then it is loth. If something is loth and not sceptred then it is not puranic. If something is common and not unlocked then it is puranic. All loth things are not puranic. All straplike things are bowery. All straplike things are bowery. Isis is loth.", "logic": "\nBowery(christin)\nnot Sceptred(christin)\nBowery(isis)\nSceptred(isis)\nnot Puranic(isis)\nLoth(isis)\nnot Straplike(isis)\nUnlocked(roze)\nCommon(roze)\nStraplike(roze)\nforall x (Bowery(x) -> Loth(x))\nforall x (Loth(x) and not Sceptred(x) -> not Puranic(x))\nforall x (Common(x) and not Unlocked(x) -> Puranic(x))\nforall x (Loth(x) -> not Puranic(x))\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> Bowery(x))\n\nLoth(isis)\n\ntherefore Loth(isis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Rollins is trancelike. Rollins is not rodlike. Agnella is trancelike. Agnella is rodlike. Agnella is not sequined. Agnella is forgiving. Agnella is not optional. Daisie is nonprofit. Daisie is carsick. Daisie is optional. If something is trancelike then it is forgiving. If something is forgiving and not rodlike then it is not sequined. If something is carsick and not nonprofit then it is sequined. All forgiving things are not sequined. All optional things are trancelike. All optional things are trancelike. Agnella is not rodlike.", "logic": "\nTrancelike(rollins)\nnot Rodlike(rollins)\nTrancelike(agnella)\nRodlike(agnella)\nnot Sequined(agnella)\nForgiving(agnella)\nnot Optional(agnella)\nNonprofit(daisie)\nCarsick(daisie)\nOptional(daisie)\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Forgiving(x))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) and not Rodlike(x) -> not Sequined(x))\nforall x (Carsick(x) and not Nonprofit(x) -> Sequined(x))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> not Sequined(x))\nforall x (Optional(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Optional(x) -> Trancelike(x))\n\nnot Rodlike(agnella)\n\ntherefore Rodlike(agnella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Benedetta is anxious. Benedetta is not xcviii. Martainn is anxious. Martainn is xcviii. Martainn is not stifled. Martainn is ascendent. Martainn is not stepwise. Davie is awninged. Davie is ghoulish. Davie is stepwise. If something is anxious then it is ascendent. If something is ascendent and not xcviii then it is not stifled. If something is ghoulish and not awninged then it is stifled. All ascendent things are not stifled. All stepwise things are anxious. All stepwise things are anxious. Benedetta is ascendent.", "logic": "\nAnxious(benedetta)\nnot Xcviii(benedetta)\nAnxious(martainn)\nXcviii(martainn)\nnot Stifled(martainn)\nAscendent(martainn)\nnot Stepwise(martainn)\nAwninged(davie)\nGhoulish(davie)\nStepwise(davie)\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Ascendent(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) and not Xcviii(x) -> not Stifled(x))\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) and not Awninged(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> not Stifled(x))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) -> Anxious(x))\n\nAscendent(benedetta)\n\nAnxious(benedetta) and forall x (Anxious(x) -> Ascendent(x)) -> therefore Ascendent(benedetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Charita is slanted. Charita is not septal. Kris is slanted. Kris is septal. Kris is not teen. Kris is unstressed. Kris is not unbranched. Lamar is abused. Lamar is egregious. Lamar is unbranched. If something is slanted then it is unstressed. If something is unstressed and not septal then it is not teen. If something is egregious and not abused then it is teen. All unstressed things are not teen. All unbranched things are slanted. All unbranched things are slanted. Charita is not unstressed.", "logic": "\nSlanted(charita)\nnot Septal(charita)\nSlanted(kris)\nSeptal(kris)\nnot Teen(kris)\nUnstressed(kris)\nnot Unbranched(kris)\nAbused(lamar)\nEgregious(lamar)\nUnbranched(lamar)\nforall x (Slanted(x) -> Unstressed(x))\nforall x (Unstressed(x) and not Septal(x) -> not Teen(x))\nforall x (Egregious(x) and not Abused(x) -> Teen(x))\nforall x (Unstressed(x) -> not Teen(x))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Slanted(x))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Slanted(x))\n\nnot Unstressed(charita)\n\nSlanted(charita) and forall x (Slanted(x) -> Unstressed(x)) -> therefore Unstressed(charita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Gaven is muscular. Gaven is not splintery. Winthrop is muscular. Winthrop is splintery. Winthrop is not methodist. Winthrop is socialist. Winthrop is not skintight. Dona is aware. Dona is winking. Dona is skintight. If something is muscular then it is socialist. If something is socialist and not splintery then it is not methodist. If something is winking and not aware then it is methodist. All socialist things are not methodist. All skintight things are muscular. All skintight things are muscular. Dona is socialist.", "logic": "\nMuscular(gaven)\nnot Splintery(gaven)\nMuscular(winthrop)\nSplintery(winthrop)\nnot Methodist(winthrop)\nSocialist(winthrop)\nnot Skintight(winthrop)\nAware(dona)\nWinking(dona)\nSkintight(dona)\nforall x (Muscular(x) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) and not Splintery(x) -> not Methodist(x))\nforall x (Winking(x) and not Aware(x) -> Methodist(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> not Methodist(x))\nforall x (Skintight(x) -> Muscular(x))\nforall x (Skintight(x) -> Muscular(x))\n\nSocialist(dona)\n\nSkintight(dona) and forall x (Skintight(x) -> Muscular(x)) -> therefore Muscular(dona) Muscular(dona) and forall x (Muscular(x) -> Socialist(x)) -> therefore Socialist(dona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Wilburt is dutch. Wilburt is not diastolic. Dolores is dutch. Dolores is diastolic. Dolores is not ungoverned. Dolores is backswept. Dolores is not incorrupt. Star is ulcerated. Star is outdoorsy. Star is incorrupt. If something is dutch then it is backswept. If something is backswept and not diastolic then it is not ungoverned. If something is outdoorsy and not ulcerated then it is ungoverned. All backswept things are not ungoverned. All incorrupt things are dutch. All incorrupt things are dutch. Wilburt is ungoverned.", "logic": "\nDutch(wilburt)\nnot Diastolic(wilburt)\nDutch(dolores)\nDiastolic(dolores)\nnot Ungoverned(dolores)\nBackswept(dolores)\nnot Incorrupt(dolores)\nUlcerated(star)\nOutdoorsy(star)\nIncorrupt(star)\nforall x (Dutch(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) and not Diastolic(x) -> not Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) and not Ulcerated(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) -> not Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Dutch(x))\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Dutch(x))\n\nUngoverned(wilburt)\n\nDutch(wilburt) and forall x (Dutch(x) -> Backswept(x)) -> therefore Backswept(wilburt) Backswept(wilburt) and forall x (Backswept(x) -> not Ungoverned(x)) -> therefore not Ungoverned(wilburt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Glori is abundant. Glori is not marked. Devonne is abundant. Devonne is marked. Devonne is not chaotic. Devonne is brazen. Devonne is not unlocated. Glenna is botched. Glenna is pleural. Glenna is unlocated. If something is abundant then it is brazen. If something is brazen and not marked then it is not chaotic. If something is pleural and not botched then it is chaotic. All brazen things are not chaotic. All unlocated things are abundant. All unlocated things are abundant. Glenna is not chaotic.", "logic": "\nAbundant(glori)\nnot Marked(glori)\nAbundant(devonne)\nMarked(devonne)\nnot Chaotic(devonne)\nBrazen(devonne)\nnot Unlocated(devonne)\nBotched(glenna)\nPleural(glenna)\nUnlocated(glenna)\nforall x (Abundant(x) -> Brazen(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x) and not Marked(x) -> not Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) and not Botched(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> not Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Abundant(x))\n\nnot Chaotic(glenna)\n\nUnlocated(glenna) and forall x (Unlocated(x) -> Abundant(x)) -> therefore Abundant(glenna) Abundant(glenna) and forall x (Abundant(x) -> Brazen(x)) -> therefore Brazen(glenna) Brazen(glenna) and forall x (Brazen(x) -> not Chaotic(x)) -> therefore not Chaotic(glenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Jaynell is pyrolignic. Jaynell is not shakedown. Cameron is pyrolignic. Cameron is shakedown. Cameron is not squashed. Cameron is dissident. Cameron is not chassidic. Alasdair is dosed. Alasdair is slavic. Alasdair is chassidic. If something is pyrolignic then it is dissident. If something is dissident and not shakedown then it is not squashed. If something is slavic and not dosed then it is squashed. All dissident things are not squashed. All chassidic things are pyrolignic. All chassidic things are pyrolignic. Alasdair is squashed.", "logic": "\nPyrolignic(jaynell)\nnot Shakedown(jaynell)\nPyrolignic(cameron)\nShakedown(cameron)\nnot Squashed(cameron)\nDissident(cameron)\nnot Chassidic(cameron)\nDosed(alasdair)\nSlavic(alasdair)\nChassidic(alasdair)\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Dissident(x))\nforall x (Dissident(x) and not Shakedown(x) -> not Squashed(x))\nforall x (Slavic(x) and not Dosed(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Dissident(x) -> not Squashed(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\n\nSquashed(alasdair)\n\nChassidic(alasdair) and forall x (Chassidic(x) -> Pyrolignic(x)) -> therefore Pyrolignic(alasdair) Pyrolignic(alasdair) and forall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Dissident(x)) -> therefore Dissident(alasdair) Dissident(alasdair) and forall x (Dissident(x) -> not Squashed(x)) -> therefore not Squashed(alasdair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Cyrill is unwilling. Cyrill is not beginning. Geralda is unwilling. Geralda is beginning. Geralda is not zoic. Geralda is uncertain. Geralda is not ferric. Joly is terminal. Joly is penile. Joly is ferric. If something is unwilling then it is uncertain. If something is uncertain and not beginning then it is not zoic. If something is penile and not terminal then it is zoic. All uncertain things are not zoic. All ferric things are unwilling. All ferric things are unwilling. Geralda is not penile.", "logic": "\nUnwilling(cyrill)\nnot Beginning(cyrill)\nUnwilling(geralda)\nBeginning(geralda)\nnot Zoic(geralda)\nUncertain(geralda)\nnot Ferric(geralda)\nTerminal(joly)\nPenile(joly)\nFerric(joly)\nforall x (Unwilling(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and not Beginning(x) -> not Zoic(x))\nforall x (Penile(x) and not Terminal(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> not Zoic(x))\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> Unwilling(x))\n\nnot Penile(geralda)\n\nnot Penile(geralda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Daphna is oafish. Daphna is not bleak. Carsten is oafish. Carsten is bleak. Carsten is not attainable. Carsten is corky. Carsten is not propelling. Dustin is strait. Dustin is dissenting. Dustin is propelling. If something is oafish then it is corky. If something is corky and not bleak then it is not attainable. If something is dissenting and not strait then it is attainable. All corky things are not attainable. All propelling things are oafish. All propelling things are oafish. Daphna is strait.", "logic": "\nOafish(daphna)\nnot Bleak(daphna)\nOafish(carsten)\nBleak(carsten)\nnot Attainable(carsten)\nCorky(carsten)\nnot Propelling(carsten)\nStrait(dustin)\nDissenting(dustin)\nPropelling(dustin)\nforall x (Oafish(x) -> Corky(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) and not Bleak(x) -> not Attainable(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) and not Strait(x) -> Attainable(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) -> not Attainable(x))\nforall x (Propelling(x) -> Oafish(x))\nforall x (Propelling(x) -> Oafish(x))\n\nStrait(daphna)\n\nStrait(daphna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Leela is xxii. Leela is not taciturn. Skippie is xxii. Skippie is taciturn. Skippie is not color. Skippie is drowsy. Skippie is not binocular. Aurie is fungal. Aurie is effluent. Aurie is binocular. If something is xxii then it is drowsy. If something is drowsy and not taciturn then it is not color. If something is effluent and not fungal then it is color. All drowsy things are not color. All binocular things are xxii. All binocular things are xxii. Aurie is not taciturn.", "logic": "\nXxii(leela)\nnot Taciturn(leela)\nXxii(skippie)\nTaciturn(skippie)\nnot Color(skippie)\nDrowsy(skippie)\nnot Binocular(skippie)\nFungal(aurie)\nEffluent(aurie)\nBinocular(aurie)\nforall x (Xxii(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) and not Taciturn(x) -> not Color(x))\nforall x (Effluent(x) and not Fungal(x) -> Color(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) -> not Color(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Xxii(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Xxii(x))\n\nnot Taciturn(aurie)\n\nnot Taciturn(aurie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Orelia is cruciate. Orelia is not paradisaic. Conrad is cruciate. Conrad is paradisaic. Conrad is not vulgar. Conrad is inpouring. Conrad is not anxiolytic. Umeko is abashed. Umeko is culinary. Umeko is anxiolytic. If something is cruciate then it is inpouring. If something is inpouring and not paradisaic then it is not vulgar. If something is culinary and not abashed then it is vulgar. All inpouring things are not vulgar. All anxiolytic things are cruciate. All anxiolytic things are cruciate. Orelia is culinary.", "logic": "\nCruciate(orelia)\nnot Paradisaic(orelia)\nCruciate(conrad)\nParadisaic(conrad)\nnot Vulgar(conrad)\nInpouring(conrad)\nnot Anxiolytic(conrad)\nAbashed(umeko)\nCulinary(umeko)\nAnxiolytic(umeko)\nforall x (Cruciate(x) -> Inpouring(x))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) and not Paradisaic(x) -> not Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Culinary(x) and not Abashed(x) -> Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) -> not Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Cruciate(x))\n\nCulinary(orelia)\n\nCulinary(orelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Mufinella is tapered. Mufinella is not nominated. Austina is tapered. Austina is nominated. Austina is not handless. Austina is anaglyphic. Austina is not fictitious. Olympia is incased. Olympia is tawdry. Olympia is fictitious. If something is tapered then it is anaglyphic. If something is anaglyphic and not nominated then it is not handless. If something is tawdry and not incased then it is handless. All anaglyphic things are not handless. All fictitious things are tapered. All fictitious things are tapered. Mufinella is not fictitious.", "logic": "\nTapered(mufinella)\nnot Nominated(mufinella)\nTapered(austina)\nNominated(austina)\nnot Handless(austina)\nAnaglyphic(austina)\nnot Fictitious(austina)\nIncased(olympia)\nTawdry(olympia)\nFictitious(olympia)\nforall x (Tapered(x) -> Anaglyphic(x))\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) and not Nominated(x) -> not Handless(x))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) and not Incased(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) -> not Handless(x))\nforall x (Fictitious(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Fictitious(x) -> Tapered(x))\n\nnot Fictitious(mufinella)\n\nnot Fictitious(mufinella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Edmund is wily. Edmund is not aortic. Sharron is wily. Sharron is aortic. Sharron is not mangy. Sharron is antimonial. Sharron is not ursine. Dacia is esthetical. Dacia is entrancing. Dacia is ursine. If something is wily then it is antimonial. If something is antimonial and not aortic then it is not mangy. If something is entrancing and not esthetical then it is mangy. All antimonial things are not mangy. All ursine things are wily. All ursine things are wily. Sharron is esthetical.", "logic": "\nWily(edmund)\nnot Aortic(edmund)\nWily(sharron)\nAortic(sharron)\nnot Mangy(sharron)\nAntimonial(sharron)\nnot Ursine(sharron)\nEsthetical(dacia)\nEntrancing(dacia)\nUrsine(dacia)\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) and not Aortic(x) -> not Mangy(x))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) and not Esthetical(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> not Mangy(x))\nforall x (Ursine(x) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Ursine(x) -> Wily(x))\n\nEsthetical(sharron)\n\nEsthetical(sharron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "The floyd is assessable. The floyd is deserving. The floyd is arithmetic. The floyd is maggoty. The floyd is bromidic. The floyd humor the hettie. The floyd exorcise the hettie. The floyd delight the hettie. The hettie is assessable. The hettie is arithmetic. The hettie is maggoty. The hettie is bromidic. The hettie humor the floyd. The hettie exorcise the floyd. The hettie delight the floyd. If something exorcise the hettie then it is maggoty. If something exorcise the floyd and it is arithmetic then it delight the floyd. If the floyd delight the hettie then the hettie exorcise the floyd. If something delight the floyd and it humor the hettie then it humor the floyd. If something delight the hettie and it exorcise the hettie then the hettie exorcise the floyd. If something is deserving and bromidic then it exorcise the hettie. If something exorcise the floyd then it is maggoty. If something is deserving then it exorcise the floyd. The floyd is maggoty.", "logic": "\nAssessable(floyd)\nDeserving(floyd)\nArithmetic(floyd)\nMaggoty(floyd)\nBromidic(floyd)\nHumor(floyd, hettie)\nExorcise(floyd, hettie)\nDelight(floyd, hettie)\nAssessable(hettie)\nArithmetic(hettie)\nMaggoty(hettie)\nBromidic(hettie)\nHumor(hettie, floyd)\nExorcise(hettie, floyd)\nDelight(hettie, floyd)\nforall x (Exorcise(x, hettie) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, floyd) and Arithmetic(x) -> Delight(x, floyd))\nDelight(floyd, hettie) -> Exorcise(hettie, floyd)\nforall x (Delight(x, floyd) and Humor(x, hettie) -> Humor(x, floyd))\nforall x (Delight(x, hettie) and Exorcise(x, hettie) -> Exorcise(hettie, floyd))\nforall x (Deserving(x) and Bromidic(x) -> Exorcise(x, hettie))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, floyd) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Exorcise(x, floyd))\n\nMaggoty(floyd)\n\ntherefore Maggoty(floyd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The aeriela is practised. The aeriela is gainful. The aeriela is pinnatifid. The aeriela is gaseous. The aeriela is shivering. The aeriela alkalinise the virgina. The aeriela labialise the virgina. The aeriela record the virgina. The virgina is practised. The virgina is pinnatifid. The virgina is gaseous. The virgina is shivering. The virgina alkalinise the aeriela. The virgina labialise the aeriela. The virgina record the aeriela. If something labialise the virgina then it is gaseous. If something labialise the aeriela and it is pinnatifid then it record the aeriela. If the aeriela record the virgina then the virgina labialise the aeriela. If something record the aeriela and it alkalinise the virgina then it alkalinise the aeriela. If something record the virgina and it labialise the virgina then the virgina labialise the aeriela. If something is gainful and shivering then it labialise the virgina. If something labialise the aeriela then it is gaseous. If something is gainful then it labialise the aeriela. The aeriela does not see the virgina.", "logic": "\nPractised(aeriela)\nGainful(aeriela)\nPinnatifid(aeriela)\nGaseous(aeriela)\nShivering(aeriela)\nAlkalinise(aeriela, virgina)\nLabialise(aeriela, virgina)\nRecord(aeriela, virgina)\nPractised(virgina)\nPinnatifid(virgina)\nGaseous(virgina)\nShivering(virgina)\nAlkalinise(virgina, aeriela)\nLabialise(virgina, aeriela)\nRecord(virgina, aeriela)\nforall x (Labialise(x, virgina) -> Gaseous(x))\nforall x (Labialise(x, aeriela) and Pinnatifid(x) -> Record(x, aeriela))\nRecord(aeriela, virgina) -> Labialise(virgina, aeriela)\nforall x (Record(x, aeriela) and Alkalinise(x, virgina) -> Alkalinise(x, aeriela))\nforall x (Record(x, virgina) and Labialise(x, virgina) -> Labialise(virgina, aeriela))\nforall x (Gainful(x) and Shivering(x) -> Labialise(x, virgina))\nforall x (Labialise(x, aeriela) -> Gaseous(x))\nforall x (Gainful(x) -> Labialise(x, aeriela))\n\nnot Labialise(aeriela, virgina)\n\ntherefore Labialise(aeriela, virgina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The olivie is unreleased. The olivie is remindful. The olivie is pacific. The olivie is virucidal. The olivie is loyal. The olivie bleat the shay. The olivie sparkle the shay. The olivie bulldoze the shay. The shay is unreleased. The shay is pacific. The shay is virucidal. The shay is loyal. The shay bleat the olivie. The shay sparkle the olivie. The shay bulldoze the olivie. If something sparkle the shay then it is virucidal. If something sparkle the olivie and it is pacific then it bulldoze the olivie. If the olivie bulldoze the shay then the shay sparkle the olivie. If something bulldoze the olivie and it bleat the shay then it bleat the olivie. If something bulldoze the shay and it sparkle the shay then the shay sparkle the olivie. If something is remindful and loyal then it sparkle the shay. If something sparkle the olivie then it is virucidal. If something is remindful then it sparkle the olivie. The olivie sparkle the olivie.", "logic": "\nUnreleased(olivie)\nRemindful(olivie)\nPacific(olivie)\nVirucidal(olivie)\nLoyal(olivie)\nBleat(olivie, shay)\nSparkle(olivie, shay)\nBulldoze(olivie, shay)\nUnreleased(shay)\nPacific(shay)\nVirucidal(shay)\nLoyal(shay)\nBleat(shay, olivie)\nSparkle(shay, olivie)\nBulldoze(shay, olivie)\nforall x (Sparkle(x, shay) -> Virucidal(x))\nforall x (Sparkle(x, olivie) and Pacific(x) -> Bulldoze(x, olivie))\nBulldoze(olivie, shay) -> Sparkle(shay, olivie)\nforall x (Bulldoze(x, olivie) and Bleat(x, shay) -> Bleat(x, olivie))\nforall x (Bulldoze(x, shay) and Sparkle(x, shay) -> Sparkle(shay, olivie))\nforall x (Remindful(x) and Loyal(x) -> Sparkle(x, shay))\nforall x (Sparkle(x, olivie) -> Virucidal(x))\nforall x (Remindful(x) -> Sparkle(x, olivie))\n\nSparkle(olivie, olivie)\n\nRemindful(olivie) and forall x (Remindful(x) -> Sparkle(x, olivie)) -> therefore Sparkle(olivie, olivie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The dayle is lucrative. The dayle is dental. The dayle is serrated. The dayle is phobic. The dayle is guardant. The dayle contour the beret. The dayle theme the beret. The dayle festoon the beret. The beret is lucrative. The beret is serrated. The beret is phobic. The beret is guardant. The beret contour the dayle. The beret theme the dayle. The beret festoon the dayle. If something theme the beret then it is phobic. If something theme the dayle and it is serrated then it festoon the dayle. If the dayle festoon the beret then the beret theme the dayle. If something festoon the dayle and it contour the beret then it contour the dayle. If something festoon the beret and it theme the beret then the beret theme the dayle. If something is dental and guardant then it theme the beret. If something theme the dayle then it is phobic. If something is dental then it theme the dayle. The dayle does not see the dayle.", "logic": "\nLucrative(dayle)\nDental(dayle)\nSerrated(dayle)\nPhobic(dayle)\nGuardant(dayle)\nContour(dayle, beret)\nTheme(dayle, beret)\nFestoon(dayle, beret)\nLucrative(beret)\nSerrated(beret)\nPhobic(beret)\nGuardant(beret)\nContour(beret, dayle)\nTheme(beret, dayle)\nFestoon(beret, dayle)\nforall x (Theme(x, beret) -> Phobic(x))\nforall x (Theme(x, dayle) and Serrated(x) -> Festoon(x, dayle))\nFestoon(dayle, beret) -> Theme(beret, dayle)\nforall x (Festoon(x, dayle) and Contour(x, beret) -> Contour(x, dayle))\nforall x (Festoon(x, beret) and Theme(x, beret) -> Theme(beret, dayle))\nforall x (Dental(x) and Guardant(x) -> Theme(x, beret))\nforall x (Theme(x, dayle) -> Phobic(x))\nforall x (Dental(x) -> Theme(x, dayle))\n\nnot Theme(dayle, dayle)\n\nDental(dayle) and forall x (Dental(x) -> Theme(x, dayle)) -> therefore Theme(dayle, dayle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The kristine is andalusian. The kristine is unhealthy. The kristine is monotonous. The kristine is continual. The kristine is semiweekly. The kristine sulfate the franni. The kristine organize the franni. The kristine misdemean the franni. The franni is andalusian. The franni is monotonous. The franni is continual. The franni is semiweekly. The franni sulfate the kristine. The franni organize the kristine. The franni misdemean the kristine. If something organize the franni then it is continual. If something organize the kristine and it is monotonous then it misdemean the kristine. If the kristine misdemean the franni then the franni organize the kristine. If something misdemean the kristine and it sulfate the franni then it sulfate the kristine. If something misdemean the franni and it organize the franni then the franni organize the kristine. If something is unhealthy and semiweekly then it organize the franni. If something organize the kristine then it is continual. If something is unhealthy then it organize the kristine. The kristine misdemean the kristine.", "logic": "\nAndalusian(kristine)\nUnhealthy(kristine)\nMonotonous(kristine)\nContinual(kristine)\nSemiweekly(kristine)\nSulfate(kristine, franni)\nOrganize(kristine, franni)\nMisdemean(kristine, franni)\nAndalusian(franni)\nMonotonous(franni)\nContinual(franni)\nSemiweekly(franni)\nSulfate(franni, kristine)\nOrganize(franni, kristine)\nMisdemean(franni, kristine)\nforall x (Organize(x, franni) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Organize(x, kristine) and Monotonous(x) -> Misdemean(x, kristine))\nMisdemean(kristine, franni) -> Organize(franni, kristine)\nforall x (Misdemean(x, kristine) and Sulfate(x, franni) -> Sulfate(x, kristine))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, franni) and Organize(x, franni) -> Organize(franni, kristine))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) and Semiweekly(x) -> Organize(x, franni))\nforall x (Organize(x, kristine) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Organize(x, kristine))\n\nMisdemean(kristine, kristine)\n\nUnhealthy(kristine) and forall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Organize(x, kristine)) -> therefore Organize(kristine, kristine) Organize(kristine, kristine) and Monotonous(kristine) and forall x (Organize(x, kristine) and Monotonous(x) -> Misdemean(x, kristine)) -> therefore Misdemean(kristine, kristine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The rick is repressive. The rick is vagabond. The rick is copasetic. The rick is insomniac. The rick is cumuliform. The rick approbate the calhoun. The rick reinforce the calhoun. The rick waddle the calhoun. The calhoun is repressive. The calhoun is copasetic. The calhoun is insomniac. The calhoun is cumuliform. The calhoun approbate the rick. The calhoun reinforce the rick. The calhoun waddle the rick. If something reinforce the calhoun then it is insomniac. If something reinforce the rick and it is copasetic then it waddle the rick. If the rick waddle the calhoun then the calhoun reinforce the rick. If something waddle the rick and it approbate the calhoun then it approbate the rick. If something waddle the calhoun and it reinforce the calhoun then the calhoun reinforce the rick. If something is vagabond and cumuliform then it reinforce the calhoun. If something reinforce the rick then it is insomniac. If something is vagabond then it reinforce the rick. The rick does not visit the rick.", "logic": "\nRepressive(rick)\nVagabond(rick)\nCopasetic(rick)\nInsomniac(rick)\nCumuliform(rick)\nApprobate(rick, calhoun)\nReinforce(rick, calhoun)\nWaddle(rick, calhoun)\nRepressive(calhoun)\nCopasetic(calhoun)\nInsomniac(calhoun)\nCumuliform(calhoun)\nApprobate(calhoun, rick)\nReinforce(calhoun, rick)\nWaddle(calhoun, rick)\nforall x (Reinforce(x, calhoun) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Reinforce(x, rick) and Copasetic(x) -> Waddle(x, rick))\nWaddle(rick, calhoun) -> Reinforce(calhoun, rick)\nforall x (Waddle(x, rick) and Approbate(x, calhoun) -> Approbate(x, rick))\nforall x (Waddle(x, calhoun) and Reinforce(x, calhoun) -> Reinforce(calhoun, rick))\nforall x (Vagabond(x) and Cumuliform(x) -> Reinforce(x, calhoun))\nforall x (Reinforce(x, rick) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Vagabond(x) -> Reinforce(x, rick))\n\nnot Waddle(rick, rick)\n\nVagabond(rick) and forall x (Vagabond(x) -> Reinforce(x, rick)) -> therefore Reinforce(rick, rick) Reinforce(rick, rick) and Copasetic(rick) and forall x (Reinforce(x, rick) and Copasetic(x) -> Waddle(x, rick)) -> therefore Waddle(rick, rick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The herby is elliptical. The herby is yearlong. The herby is penal. The herby is acetic. The herby is adaptive. The herby sough the putnam. The herby cere the putnam. The herby whelp the putnam. The putnam is elliptical. The putnam is penal. The putnam is acetic. The putnam is adaptive. The putnam sough the herby. The putnam cere the herby. The putnam whelp the herby. If something cere the putnam then it is acetic. If something cere the herby and it is penal then it whelp the herby. If the herby whelp the putnam then the putnam cere the herby. If something whelp the herby and it sough the putnam then it sough the herby. If something whelp the putnam and it cere the putnam then the putnam cere the herby. If something is yearlong and adaptive then it cere the putnam. If something cere the herby then it is acetic. If something is yearlong then it cere the herby. The herby sough the herby.", "logic": "\nElliptical(herby)\nYearlong(herby)\nPenal(herby)\nAcetic(herby)\nAdaptive(herby)\nSough(herby, putnam)\nCere(herby, putnam)\nWhelp(herby, putnam)\nElliptical(putnam)\nPenal(putnam)\nAcetic(putnam)\nAdaptive(putnam)\nSough(putnam, herby)\nCere(putnam, herby)\nWhelp(putnam, herby)\nforall x (Cere(x, putnam) -> Acetic(x))\nforall x (Cere(x, herby) and Penal(x) -> Whelp(x, herby))\nWhelp(herby, putnam) -> Cere(putnam, herby)\nforall x (Whelp(x, herby) and Sough(x, putnam) -> Sough(x, herby))\nforall x (Whelp(x, putnam) and Cere(x, putnam) -> Cere(putnam, herby))\nforall x (Yearlong(x) and Adaptive(x) -> Cere(x, putnam))\nforall x (Cere(x, herby) -> Acetic(x))\nforall x (Yearlong(x) -> Cere(x, herby))\n\nSough(herby, herby)\n\nYearlong(herby) and forall x (Yearlong(x) -> Cere(x, herby)) -> therefore Cere(herby, herby) Cere(herby, herby) and Penal(herby) and forall x (Cere(x, herby) and Penal(x) -> Whelp(x, herby)) -> therefore Whelp(herby, herby) Whelp(herby, herby) and Sough(herby, putnam) and forall x (Whelp(x, herby) and Sough(x, putnam) -> Sough(x, herby)) -> therefore Sough(herby, herby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The lilias is swish. The lilias is moderne. The lilias is imbricated. The lilias is calendric. The lilias is afeared. The lilias hoodwink the zebadiah. The lilias garment the zebadiah. The lilias imitate the zebadiah. The zebadiah is swish. The zebadiah is imbricated. The zebadiah is calendric. The zebadiah is afeared. The zebadiah hoodwink the lilias. The zebadiah garment the lilias. The zebadiah imitate the lilias. If something garment the zebadiah then it is calendric. If something garment the lilias and it is imbricated then it imitate the lilias. If the lilias imitate the zebadiah then the zebadiah garment the lilias. If something imitate the lilias and it hoodwink the zebadiah then it hoodwink the lilias. If something imitate the zebadiah and it garment the zebadiah then the zebadiah garment the lilias. If something is moderne and afeared then it garment the zebadiah. If something garment the lilias then it is calendric. If something is moderne then it garment the lilias. The lilias does not like the lilias.", "logic": "\nSwish(lilias)\nModerne(lilias)\nImbricated(lilias)\nCalendric(lilias)\nAfeared(lilias)\nHoodwink(lilias, zebadiah)\nGarment(lilias, zebadiah)\nImitate(lilias, zebadiah)\nSwish(zebadiah)\nImbricated(zebadiah)\nCalendric(zebadiah)\nAfeared(zebadiah)\nHoodwink(zebadiah, lilias)\nGarment(zebadiah, lilias)\nImitate(zebadiah, lilias)\nforall x (Garment(x, zebadiah) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Garment(x, lilias) and Imbricated(x) -> Imitate(x, lilias))\nImitate(lilias, zebadiah) -> Garment(zebadiah, lilias)\nforall x (Imitate(x, lilias) and Hoodwink(x, zebadiah) -> Hoodwink(x, lilias))\nforall x (Imitate(x, zebadiah) and Garment(x, zebadiah) -> Garment(zebadiah, lilias))\nforall x (Moderne(x) and Afeared(x) -> Garment(x, zebadiah))\nforall x (Garment(x, lilias) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Moderne(x) -> Garment(x, lilias))\n\nnot Hoodwink(lilias, lilias)\n\nModerne(lilias) and forall x (Moderne(x) -> Garment(x, lilias)) -> therefore Garment(lilias, lilias) Garment(lilias, lilias) and Imbricated(lilias) and forall x (Garment(x, lilias) and Imbricated(x) -> Imitate(x, lilias)) -> therefore Imitate(lilias, lilias) Imitate(lilias, lilias) and Hoodwink(lilias, zebadiah) and forall x (Imitate(x, lilias) and Hoodwink(x, zebadiah) -> Hoodwink(x, lilias)) -> therefore Hoodwink(lilias, lilias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The mathilde is ingrowing. The mathilde is scientific. The mathilde is grasslike. The mathilde is forty. The mathilde is pleochroic. The mathilde bulletin the iseabal. The mathilde revenge the iseabal. The mathilde gazette the iseabal. The iseabal is ingrowing. The iseabal is grasslike. The iseabal is forty. The iseabal is pleochroic. The iseabal bulletin the mathilde. The iseabal revenge the mathilde. The iseabal gazette the mathilde. If something revenge the iseabal then it is forty. If something revenge the mathilde and it is grasslike then it gazette the mathilde. If the mathilde gazette the iseabal then the iseabal revenge the mathilde. If something gazette the mathilde and it bulletin the iseabal then it bulletin the mathilde. If something gazette the iseabal and it revenge the iseabal then the iseabal revenge the mathilde. If something is scientific and pleochroic then it revenge the iseabal. If something revenge the mathilde then it is forty. If something is scientific then it revenge the mathilde. The iseabal does not see the iseabal.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(mathilde)\nScientific(mathilde)\nGrasslike(mathilde)\nForty(mathilde)\nPleochroic(mathilde)\nBulletin(mathilde, iseabal)\nRevenge(mathilde, iseabal)\nGazette(mathilde, iseabal)\nIngrowing(iseabal)\nGrasslike(iseabal)\nForty(iseabal)\nPleochroic(iseabal)\nBulletin(iseabal, mathilde)\nRevenge(iseabal, mathilde)\nGazette(iseabal, mathilde)\nforall x (Revenge(x, iseabal) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Revenge(x, mathilde) and Grasslike(x) -> Gazette(x, mathilde))\nGazette(mathilde, iseabal) -> Revenge(iseabal, mathilde)\nforall x (Gazette(x, mathilde) and Bulletin(x, iseabal) -> Bulletin(x, mathilde))\nforall x (Gazette(x, iseabal) and Revenge(x, iseabal) -> Revenge(iseabal, mathilde))\nforall x (Scientific(x) and Pleochroic(x) -> Revenge(x, iseabal))\nforall x (Revenge(x, mathilde) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Scientific(x) -> Revenge(x, mathilde))\n\nnot Revenge(iseabal, iseabal)\n\nforall x (Scientific(x) and Pleochroic(x) -> Revenge(x, iseabal)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The rosaline is apparent. The rosaline is migrant. The rosaline is groundless. The rosaline is undeserved. The rosaline is subdued. The rosaline satirize the maire. The rosaline disunify the maire. The rosaline share the maire. The maire is apparent. The maire is groundless. The maire is undeserved. The maire is subdued. The maire satirize the rosaline. The maire disunify the rosaline. The maire share the rosaline. If something disunify the maire then it is undeserved. If something disunify the rosaline and it is groundless then it share the rosaline. If the rosaline share the maire then the maire disunify the rosaline. If something share the rosaline and it satirize the maire then it satirize the rosaline. If something share the maire and it disunify the maire then the maire disunify the rosaline. If something is migrant and subdued then it disunify the maire. If something disunify the rosaline then it is undeserved. If something is migrant then it disunify the rosaline. The maire is migrant.", "logic": "\nApparent(rosaline)\nMigrant(rosaline)\nGroundless(rosaline)\nUndeserved(rosaline)\nSubdued(rosaline)\nSatirize(rosaline, maire)\nDisunify(rosaline, maire)\nShare(rosaline, maire)\nApparent(maire)\nGroundless(maire)\nUndeserved(maire)\nSubdued(maire)\nSatirize(maire, rosaline)\nDisunify(maire, rosaline)\nShare(maire, rosaline)\nforall x (Disunify(x, maire) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Disunify(x, rosaline) and Groundless(x) -> Share(x, rosaline))\nShare(rosaline, maire) -> Disunify(maire, rosaline)\nforall x (Share(x, rosaline) and Satirize(x, maire) -> Satirize(x, rosaline))\nforall x (Share(x, maire) and Disunify(x, maire) -> Disunify(maire, rosaline))\nforall x (Migrant(x) and Subdued(x) -> Disunify(x, maire))\nforall x (Disunify(x, rosaline) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Migrant(x) -> Disunify(x, rosaline))\n\nMigrant(maire)\n\nMigrant(maire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The lela is aciculate. The lela is perplexing. The lela is unshadowed. The lela is feathered. The lela is dinky. The lela propel the mandy. The lela caption the mandy. The lela overspend the mandy. The mandy is aciculate. The mandy is unshadowed. The mandy is feathered. The mandy is dinky. The mandy propel the lela. The mandy caption the lela. The mandy overspend the lela. If something caption the mandy then it is feathered. If something caption the lela and it is unshadowed then it overspend the lela. If the lela overspend the mandy then the mandy caption the lela. If something overspend the lela and it propel the mandy then it propel the lela. If something overspend the mandy and it caption the mandy then the mandy caption the lela. If something is perplexing and dinky then it caption the mandy. If something caption the lela then it is feathered. If something is perplexing then it caption the lela. The mandy does not like the mandy.", "logic": "\nAciculate(lela)\nPerplexing(lela)\nUnshadowed(lela)\nFeathered(lela)\nDinky(lela)\nPropel(lela, mandy)\nCaption(lela, mandy)\nOverspend(lela, mandy)\nAciculate(mandy)\nUnshadowed(mandy)\nFeathered(mandy)\nDinky(mandy)\nPropel(mandy, lela)\nCaption(mandy, lela)\nOverspend(mandy, lela)\nforall x (Caption(x, mandy) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Caption(x, lela) and Unshadowed(x) -> Overspend(x, lela))\nOverspend(lela, mandy) -> Caption(mandy, lela)\nforall x (Overspend(x, lela) and Propel(x, mandy) -> Propel(x, lela))\nforall x (Overspend(x, mandy) and Caption(x, mandy) -> Caption(mandy, lela))\nforall x (Perplexing(x) and Dinky(x) -> Caption(x, mandy))\nforall x (Caption(x, lela) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Perplexing(x) -> Caption(x, lela))\n\nnot Propel(mandy, mandy)\n\nnot Propel(mandy, mandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The avril is compressed. The avril is unitary. The avril is unaccented. The avril is cyclopean. The avril is seismal. The avril input the janka. The avril enclose the janka. The avril irrigate the janka. The janka is compressed. The janka is unaccented. The janka is cyclopean. The janka is seismal. The janka input the avril. The janka enclose the avril. The janka irrigate the avril. If something enclose the janka then it is cyclopean. If something enclose the avril and it is unaccented then it irrigate the avril. If the avril irrigate the janka then the janka enclose the avril. If something irrigate the avril and it input the janka then it input the avril. If something irrigate the janka and it enclose the janka then the janka enclose the avril. If something is unitary and seismal then it enclose the janka. If something enclose the avril then it is cyclopean. If something is unitary then it enclose the avril. The janka irrigate the janka.", "logic": "\nCompressed(avril)\nUnitary(avril)\nUnaccented(avril)\nCyclopean(avril)\nSeismal(avril)\nInput(avril, janka)\nEnclose(avril, janka)\nIrrigate(avril, janka)\nCompressed(janka)\nUnaccented(janka)\nCyclopean(janka)\nSeismal(janka)\nInput(janka, avril)\nEnclose(janka, avril)\nIrrigate(janka, avril)\nforall x (Enclose(x, janka) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Enclose(x, avril) and Unaccented(x) -> Irrigate(x, avril))\nIrrigate(avril, janka) -> Enclose(janka, avril)\nforall x (Irrigate(x, avril) and Input(x, janka) -> Input(x, avril))\nforall x (Irrigate(x, janka) and Enclose(x, janka) -> Enclose(janka, avril))\nforall x (Unitary(x) and Seismal(x) -> Enclose(x, janka))\nforall x (Enclose(x, avril) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Enclose(x, avril))\n\nIrrigate(janka, janka)\n\nIrrigate(janka, janka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "Regen is monogamous. Regen is umbellar. Regen is imputable. Jobyna is umbellar. Jobyna is imputable. Jobyna is gonadal. Zora is monogamous. Zora is umbellar. Brigid is umbellar. Brigid is setaceous. Kind, monogamous things are setaceous. Quiet, umbellar things are seeming. Smart, monogamous things are tame. Jobyna is umbellar.", "logic": "\nMonogamous(regen)\nUmbellar(regen)\nImputable(regen)\nUmbellar(jobyna)\nImputable(jobyna)\nGonadal(jobyna)\nMonogamous(zora)\nUmbellar(zora)\nUmbellar(brigid)\nSetaceous(brigid)\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Setaceous(x))\nforall x (Setaceous(x) and Umbellar(x) -> Seeming(x))\nforall x (Seeming(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Tame(x))\n\nUmbellar(jobyna)\n\ntherefore Umbellar(jobyna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Ulric is bally. Ulric is tearaway. Ulric is blackish. Murdock is tearaway. Murdock is blackish. Murdock is general. Sibley is bally. Sibley is tearaway. Rufus is tearaway. Rufus is adrenergic. Kind, bally things are adrenergic. Quiet, tearaway things are uptight. Smart, bally things are true. Sibley is not tearaway.", "logic": "\nBally(ulric)\nTearaway(ulric)\nBlackish(ulric)\nTearaway(murdock)\nBlackish(murdock)\nGeneral(murdock)\nBally(sibley)\nTearaway(sibley)\nTearaway(rufus)\nAdrenergic(rufus)\nforall x (Blackish(x) and Bally(x) -> Adrenergic(x))\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) and Tearaway(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Uptight(x) and Bally(x) -> True(x))\n\nnot Tearaway(sibley)\n\ntherefore Tearaway(sibley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Deana is tsarist. Deana is filmable. Deana is motorial. Lem is filmable. Lem is motorial. Lem is merged. Glenine is tsarist. Glenine is filmable. Geralda is filmable. Geralda is hackneyed. Kind, tsarist things are hackneyed. Quiet, filmable things are absolutist. Smart, tsarist things are unservile. Geralda is absolutist.", "logic": "\nTsarist(deana)\nFilmable(deana)\nMotorial(deana)\nFilmable(lem)\nMotorial(lem)\nMerged(lem)\nTsarist(glenine)\nFilmable(glenine)\nFilmable(geralda)\nHackneyed(geralda)\nforall x (Motorial(x) and Tsarist(x) -> Hackneyed(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) and Filmable(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Absolutist(x) and Tsarist(x) -> Unservile(x))\n\nAbsolutist(geralda)\n\nHackneyed(geralda) and Filmable(geralda) and forall x (Hackneyed(x) and Filmable(x) -> Absolutist(x)) -> therefore Absolutist(geralda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Elvis is rakish. Elvis is stative. Elvis is minatory. Markos is stative. Markos is minatory. Markos is beneficed. Aina is rakish. Aina is stative. Wynnie is stative. Wynnie is spotless. Kind, rakish things are spotless. Quiet, stative things are disjoined. Smart, rakish things are benthic. Elvis is not spotless.", "logic": "\nRakish(elvis)\nStative(elvis)\nMinatory(elvis)\nStative(markos)\nMinatory(markos)\nBeneficed(markos)\nRakish(aina)\nStative(aina)\nStative(wynnie)\nSpotless(wynnie)\nforall x (Minatory(x) and Rakish(x) -> Spotless(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Stative(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Disjoined(x) and Rakish(x) -> Benthic(x))\n\nnot Spotless(elvis)\n\nMinatory(elvis) and Rakish(elvis) and forall x (Minatory(x) and Rakish(x) -> Spotless(x)) -> therefore Spotless(elvis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Nealon is thoughtful. Nealon is stiff. Nealon is extropic. Hugh is stiff. Hugh is extropic. Hugh is heavenly. Guthrey is thoughtful. Guthrey is stiff. Stephan is stiff. Stephan is overarm. Kind, thoughtful things are overarm. Quiet, stiff things are blurry. Smart, thoughtful things are scrotal. Nealon is blurry.", "logic": "\nThoughtful(nealon)\nStiff(nealon)\nExtropic(nealon)\nStiff(hugh)\nExtropic(hugh)\nHeavenly(hugh)\nThoughtful(guthrey)\nStiff(guthrey)\nStiff(stephan)\nOverarm(stephan)\nforall x (Extropic(x) and Thoughtful(x) -> Overarm(x))\nforall x (Overarm(x) and Stiff(x) -> Blurry(x))\nforall x (Blurry(x) and Thoughtful(x) -> Scrotal(x))\n\nBlurry(nealon)\n\nExtropic(nealon) and Thoughtful(nealon) and forall x (Extropic(x) and Thoughtful(x) -> Overarm(x)) -> therefore Overarm(nealon) Overarm(nealon) and Stiff(nealon) and forall x (Overarm(x) and Stiff(x) -> Blurry(x)) -> therefore Blurry(nealon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Lex is fabian. Lex is becoming. Lex is creaky. Kenton is becoming. Kenton is creaky. Kenton is renewed. Samara is fabian. Samara is becoming. Noella is becoming. Noella is meshed. Kind, fabian things are meshed. Quiet, becoming things are chiasmic. Smart, fabian things are studied. Lex is not chiasmic.", "logic": "\nFabian(lex)\nBecoming(lex)\nCreaky(lex)\nBecoming(kenton)\nCreaky(kenton)\nRenewed(kenton)\nFabian(samara)\nBecoming(samara)\nBecoming(noella)\nMeshed(noella)\nforall x (Creaky(x) and Fabian(x) -> Meshed(x))\nforall x (Meshed(x) and Becoming(x) -> Chiasmic(x))\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) and Fabian(x) -> Studied(x))\n\nnot Chiasmic(lex)\n\nCreaky(lex) and Fabian(lex) and forall x (Creaky(x) and Fabian(x) -> Meshed(x)) -> therefore Meshed(lex) Meshed(lex) and Becoming(lex) and forall x (Meshed(x) and Becoming(x) -> Chiasmic(x)) -> therefore Chiasmic(lex)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Osgood is acetabular. Osgood is pukka. Osgood is each. Joyous is pukka. Joyous is each. Joyous is tannish. Rudie is acetabular. Rudie is pukka. Pansy is pukka. Pansy is necked. Kind, acetabular things are necked. Quiet, pukka things are shiftless. Smart, acetabular things are subocular. Osgood is subocular.", "logic": "\nAcetabular(osgood)\nPukka(osgood)\nEach(osgood)\nPukka(joyous)\nEach(joyous)\nTannish(joyous)\nAcetabular(rudie)\nPukka(rudie)\nPukka(pansy)\nNecked(pansy)\nforall x (Each(x) and Acetabular(x) -> Necked(x))\nforall x (Necked(x) and Pukka(x) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Shiftless(x) and Acetabular(x) -> Subocular(x))\n\nSubocular(osgood)\n\nEach(osgood) and Acetabular(osgood) and forall x (Each(x) and Acetabular(x) -> Necked(x)) -> therefore Necked(osgood) Necked(osgood) and Pukka(osgood) and forall x (Necked(x) and Pukka(x) -> Shiftless(x)) -> therefore Shiftless(osgood) Shiftless(osgood) and Acetabular(osgood) and forall x (Shiftless(x) and Acetabular(x) -> Subocular(x)) -> therefore Subocular(osgood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Lillian is harmonized. Lillian is unavenged. Lillian is motile. Terra is unavenged. Terra is motile. Terra is autogamic. Delora is harmonized. Delora is unavenged. Olly is unavenged. Olly is fortemente. Kind, harmonized things are fortemente. Quiet, unavenged things are organismal. Smart, harmonized things are thievish. Lillian is not thievish.", "logic": "\nHarmonized(lillian)\nUnavenged(lillian)\nMotile(lillian)\nUnavenged(terra)\nMotile(terra)\nAutogamic(terra)\nHarmonized(delora)\nUnavenged(delora)\nUnavenged(olly)\nFortemente(olly)\nforall x (Motile(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Fortemente(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Unavenged(x) -> Organismal(x))\nforall x (Organismal(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Thievish(x))\n\nnot Thievish(lillian)\n\nMotile(lillian) and Harmonized(lillian) and forall x (Motile(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Fortemente(x)) -> therefore Fortemente(lillian) Fortemente(lillian) and Unavenged(lillian) and forall x (Fortemente(x) and Unavenged(x) -> Organismal(x)) -> therefore Organismal(lillian) Organismal(lillian) and Harmonized(lillian) and forall x (Organismal(x) and Harmonized(x) -> Thievish(x)) -> therefore Thievish(lillian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Jean is ecdemic. Jean is fitted. Jean is webbed. Sherlocke is fitted. Sherlocke is webbed. Sherlocke is crazy. Celestia is ecdemic. Celestia is fitted. Sena is fitted. Sena is ornamental. Kind, ecdemic things are ornamental. Quiet, fitted things are wayward. Smart, ecdemic things are rumpled. Sherlocke is not rumpled.", "logic": "\nEcdemic(jean)\nFitted(jean)\nWebbed(jean)\nFitted(sherlocke)\nWebbed(sherlocke)\nCrazy(sherlocke)\nEcdemic(celestia)\nFitted(celestia)\nFitted(sena)\nOrnamental(sena)\nforall x (Webbed(x) and Ecdemic(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Ornamental(x) and Fitted(x) -> Wayward(x))\nforall x (Wayward(x) and Ecdemic(x) -> Rumpled(x))\n\nnot Rumpled(sherlocke)\n\nforall x (Wayward(x) and Ecdemic(x) -> Rumpled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Micheal is clueless. Micheal is towering. Micheal is frumpy. Ranna is towering. Ranna is frumpy. Ranna is actionable. Ginelle is clueless. Ginelle is towering. Bridgette is towering. Bridgette is macabre. Kind, clueless things are macabre. Quiet, towering things are cussed. Smart, clueless things are rending. Ginelle is cussed.", "logic": "\nClueless(micheal)\nTowering(micheal)\nFrumpy(micheal)\nTowering(ranna)\nFrumpy(ranna)\nActionable(ranna)\nClueless(ginelle)\nTowering(ginelle)\nTowering(bridgette)\nMacabre(bridgette)\nforall x (Frumpy(x) and Clueless(x) -> Macabre(x))\nforall x (Macabre(x) and Towering(x) -> Cussed(x))\nforall x (Cussed(x) and Clueless(x) -> Rending(x))\n\nCussed(ginelle)\n\nforall x (Macabre(x) and Towering(x) -> Cussed(x)) <- forall x (Frumpy(x) and Clueless(x) -> Macabre(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Angil is maximal. Angil is congestive. Angil is fulminant. Agretha is congestive. Agretha is fulminant. Agretha is glooming. Lira is maximal. Lira is congestive. Jobie is congestive. Jobie is open. Kind, maximal things are open. Quiet, congestive things are unobserved. Smart, maximal things are handleless. Agretha is not open.", "logic": "\nMaximal(angil)\nCongestive(angil)\nFulminant(angil)\nCongestive(agretha)\nFulminant(agretha)\nGlooming(agretha)\nMaximal(lira)\nCongestive(lira)\nCongestive(jobie)\nOpen(jobie)\nforall x (Fulminant(x) and Maximal(x) -> Open(x))\nforall x (Open(x) and Congestive(x) -> Unobserved(x))\nforall x (Unobserved(x) and Maximal(x) -> Handleless(x))\n\nnot Open(agretha)\n\nforall x (Fulminant(x) and Maximal(x) -> Open(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Morley is subdued. Morley is expurgated. Morley is titanic. Durand is expurgated. Durand is titanic. Durand is luxurious. Charline is subdued. Charline is expurgated. Hollie is expurgated. Hollie is bolivian. Kind, subdued things are bolivian. Quiet, expurgated things are coastal. Smart, subdued things are ablative. Charline is bolivian.", "logic": "\nSubdued(morley)\nExpurgated(morley)\nTitanic(morley)\nExpurgated(durand)\nTitanic(durand)\nLuxurious(durand)\nSubdued(charline)\nExpurgated(charline)\nExpurgated(hollie)\nBolivian(hollie)\nforall x (Titanic(x) and Subdued(x) -> Bolivian(x))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Expurgated(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Coastal(x) and Subdued(x) -> Ablative(x))\n\nBolivian(charline)\n\nforall x (Titanic(x) and Subdued(x) -> Bolivian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Lelah is stretchy. Lelah is classless. Lelah is sighted. Terrence is classless. Terrence is sighted. Terrence is surface. Lusa is stretchy. Lusa is classless. Adele is classless. Adele is cuttable. Kind, stretchy things are cuttable. Quiet, classless things are redbrick. Smart, stretchy things are sybaritic. Adele is not sighted.", "logic": "\nStretchy(lelah)\nClassless(lelah)\nSighted(lelah)\nClassless(terrence)\nSighted(terrence)\nSurface(terrence)\nStretchy(lusa)\nClassless(lusa)\nClassless(adele)\nCuttable(adele)\nforall x (Sighted(x) and Stretchy(x) -> Cuttable(x))\nforall x (Cuttable(x) and Classless(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and Stretchy(x) -> Sybaritic(x))\n\nnot Sighted(adele)\n\nnot Sighted(adele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Simonne is fused. Simonne is acaudate. Simonne is blasting. Sherlock is acaudate. Sherlock is blasting. Sherlock is lively. Danna is fused. Danna is acaudate. Ginevra is acaudate. Ginevra is caudate. Kind, fused things are caudate. Quiet, acaudate things are andante. Smart, fused things are carpellate. Danna is blasting.", "logic": "\nFused(simonne)\nAcaudate(simonne)\nBlasting(simonne)\nAcaudate(sherlock)\nBlasting(sherlock)\nLively(sherlock)\nFused(danna)\nAcaudate(danna)\nAcaudate(ginevra)\nCaudate(ginevra)\nforall x (Blasting(x) and Fused(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Caudate(x) and Acaudate(x) -> Andante(x))\nforall x (Andante(x) and Fused(x) -> Carpellate(x))\n\nBlasting(danna)\n\nBlasting(danna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Pepita is gallican. Pepita is serous. Pepita is unbeknown. Mick is serous. Mick is unbeknown. Mick is hormonal. Morrie is gallican. Morrie is serous. Ariel is serous. Ariel is undamaged. Kind, gallican things are undamaged. Quiet, serous things are adjunct. Smart, gallican things are foetal. Ariel is not gallican.", "logic": "\nGallican(pepita)\nSerous(pepita)\nUnbeknown(pepita)\nSerous(mick)\nUnbeknown(mick)\nHormonal(mick)\nGallican(morrie)\nSerous(morrie)\nSerous(ariel)\nUndamaged(ariel)\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) and Gallican(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) and Serous(x) -> Adjunct(x))\nforall x (Adjunct(x) and Gallican(x) -> Foetal(x))\n\nnot Gallican(ariel)\n\nnot Gallican(ariel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Korrie is unhallowed. Korrie is turbulent. Korrie is unchanged. Audrye is turbulent. Audrye is unchanged. Audrye is unmanful. Jennings is unhallowed. Jennings is turbulent. Felicia is turbulent. Felicia is unsuited. Kind, unhallowed things are unsuited. Quiet, turbulent things are flukey. Smart, unhallowed things are recursive. Jennings is unmanful.", "logic": "\nUnhallowed(korrie)\nTurbulent(korrie)\nUnchanged(korrie)\nTurbulent(audrye)\nUnchanged(audrye)\nUnmanful(audrye)\nUnhallowed(jennings)\nTurbulent(jennings)\nTurbulent(felicia)\nUnsuited(felicia)\nforall x (Unchanged(x) and Unhallowed(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Turbulent(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Flukey(x) and Unhallowed(x) -> Recursive(x))\n\nUnmanful(jennings)\n\nUnmanful(jennings) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "The nealon is lifted. All lifted people are quasi. Big, geophytic people are inherent. If someone is lifted and quasi then they are geophytic. The nealon is lifted.", "logic": "\nLifted(nealon)\nforall x (Lifted(x) -> Quasi(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Geophytic(x) -> Inherent(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Quasi(x) -> Geophytic(x))\n\nLifted(nealon)\n\ntherefore Lifted(nealon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The liuka is bimestrial. All bimestrial people are octuple. Big, reassured people are trimotored. If someone is bimestrial and octuple then they are reassured. The liuka is not bimestrial.", "logic": "\nBimestrial(liuka)\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Octuple(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) and Reassured(x) -> Trimotored(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) and Octuple(x) -> Reassured(x))\n\nnot Bimestrial(liuka)\n\ntherefore Bimestrial(liuka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The karleen is miasmic. All miasmic people are diverging. Big, needled people are scurrilous. If someone is miasmic and diverging then they are needled. The karleen is diverging.", "logic": "\nMiasmic(karleen)\nforall x (Miasmic(x) -> Diverging(x))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) and Needled(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) and Diverging(x) -> Needled(x))\n\nDiverging(karleen)\n\nMiasmic(karleen) and forall x (Miasmic(x) -> Diverging(x)) -> therefore Diverging(karleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The sheryl is lxxvi. All lxxvi people are alpine. Big, katabatic people are upward. If someone is lxxvi and alpine then they are katabatic. The sheryl is not alpine.", "logic": "\nLxxvi(sheryl)\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Alpine(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) and Katabatic(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) and Alpine(x) -> Katabatic(x))\n\nnot Alpine(sheryl)\n\nLxxvi(sheryl) and forall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Alpine(x)) -> therefore Alpine(sheryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The traci is monogynous. All monogynous people are hesperian. Big, arterial people are impudent. If someone is monogynous and hesperian then they are arterial. The traci is arterial.", "logic": "\nMonogynous(traci)\nforall x (Monogynous(x) -> Hesperian(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) and Arterial(x) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) and Hesperian(x) -> Arterial(x))\n\nArterial(traci)\n\nMonogynous(traci) and forall x (Monogynous(x) -> Hesperian(x)) -> therefore Hesperian(traci) Monogynous(traci) and Hesperian(traci) and forall x (Monogynous(x) and Hesperian(x) -> Arterial(x)) -> therefore Arterial(traci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The giovanne is rich. All rich people are kechuan. Big, designing people are precise. If someone is rich and kechuan then they are designing. The giovanne is not designing.", "logic": "\nRich(giovanne)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Kechuan(x))\nforall x (Rich(x) and Designing(x) -> Precise(x))\nforall x (Rich(x) and Kechuan(x) -> Designing(x))\n\nnot Designing(giovanne)\n\nRich(giovanne) and forall x (Rich(x) -> Kechuan(x)) -> therefore Kechuan(giovanne) Rich(giovanne) and Kechuan(giovanne) and forall x (Rich(x) and Kechuan(x) -> Designing(x)) -> therefore Designing(giovanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The kettie is freehand. All freehand people are mammalian. Big, unweary people are dysgenic. If someone is freehand and mammalian then they are unweary. The kettie is dysgenic.", "logic": "\nFreehand(kettie)\nforall x (Freehand(x) -> Mammalian(x))\nforall x (Freehand(x) and Unweary(x) -> Dysgenic(x))\nforall x (Freehand(x) and Mammalian(x) -> Unweary(x))\n\nDysgenic(kettie)\n\nFreehand(kettie) and forall x (Freehand(x) -> Mammalian(x)) -> therefore Mammalian(kettie) Freehand(kettie) and Mammalian(kettie) and forall x (Freehand(x) and Mammalian(x) -> Unweary(x)) -> therefore Unweary(kettie) Freehand(kettie) and Unweary(kettie) and forall x (Freehand(x) and Unweary(x) -> Dysgenic(x)) -> therefore Dysgenic(kettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The jorie is centesimal. All centesimal people are portuguese. Big, optimistic people are immovable. If someone is centesimal and portuguese then they are optimistic. The jorie is not immovable.", "logic": "\nCentesimal(jorie)\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> Portuguese(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and Optimistic(x) -> Immovable(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and Portuguese(x) -> Optimistic(x))\n\nnot Immovable(jorie)\n\nCentesimal(jorie) and forall x (Centesimal(x) -> Portuguese(x)) -> therefore Portuguese(jorie) Centesimal(jorie) and Portuguese(jorie) and forall x (Centesimal(x) and Portuguese(x) -> Optimistic(x)) -> therefore Optimistic(jorie) Centesimal(jorie) and Optimistic(jorie) and forall x (Centesimal(x) and Optimistic(x) -> Immovable(x)) -> therefore Immovable(jorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The kathlene is egocentric. All egocentric people are sugarless. Big, reasoned people are strategic. If someone is egocentric and sugarless then they are reasoned. The kathlene does not like the kathlene.", "logic": "\nEgocentric(kathlene)\nforall x (Egocentric(x) -> Sugarless(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and Sugarless(x) -> Reasoned(x))\n\nnot Likes(kathlene, kathlene)\n\nnot Likes(kathlene, kathlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The nunzio is pituitary. All pituitary people are tacky. Big, unaware people are scabrous. If someone is pituitary and tacky then they are unaware. The nunzio is cold.", "logic": "\nPituitary(nunzio)\nforall x (Pituitary(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Unaware(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Tacky(x) -> Unaware(x))\n\nCold(nunzio)\n\nCold(nunzio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The charmane is dyed. All dyed people are gossipy. Big, unsated people are sequential. If someone is dyed and gossipy then they are unsated. The charmane does not need the charmane.", "logic": "\nDyed(charmane)\nforall x (Dyed(x) -> Gossipy(x))\nforall x (Dyed(x) and Unsated(x) -> Sequential(x))\nforall x (Dyed(x) and Gossipy(x) -> Unsated(x))\n\nnot Needs(charmane, charmane)\n\nnot Needs(charmane, charmane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The ransom is natural. All natural people are wraithlike. Big, victorian people are senseless. If someone is natural and wraithlike then they are victorian. The ransom sees the ransom.", "logic": "\nNatural(ransom)\nforall x (Natural(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\nforall x (Natural(x) and Victorian(x) -> Senseless(x))\nforall x (Natural(x) and Wraithlike(x) -> Victorian(x))\n\nSees(ransom, ransom)\n\nSees(ransom, ransom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "Carine is ranked. Hamid is crushed. Fletch is unsporting. If someone is saharan then they are not crushed. If someone is unsporting and ersatz then they are ranked. If someone is ranked then they are unsporting. Furry people are not unsporting. Blue people are saharan. If someone is raising and not ersatz then they are saharan. All raising, ersatz people are not saharan. If someone is ranked and not saharan then they are not aided. Hamid is crushed.", "logic": "\nRanked(carine)\nCrushed(hamid)\nUnsporting(fletch)\nforall x (Saharan(x) -> not Crushed(x))\nforall x (Unsporting(x) and Ersatz(x) -> Ranked(x))\nforall x (Ranked(x) -> Unsporting(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) -> not Unsporting(x))\nforall x (Unsporting(x) -> Saharan(x))\nforall x (Raising(x) and not Ersatz(x) -> Saharan(x))\nforall x (Raising(x) and Ersatz(x) -> not Saharan(x))\nforall x (Ranked(x) and not Saharan(x) -> not Aided(x))\n\nCrushed(hamid)\n\ntherefore Crushed(hamid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Timmie is choked. Yaakov is piscatory. Antonia is rust. If someone is appalled then they are not piscatory. If someone is rust and triploid then they are choked. If someone is choked then they are rust. Furry people are not rust. Blue people are appalled. If someone is archival and not triploid then they are appalled. All archival, triploid people are not appalled. If someone is choked and not appalled then they are not covariant. Antonia is not rust.", "logic": "\nChoked(timmie)\nPiscatory(yaakov)\nRust(antonia)\nforall x (Appalled(x) -> not Piscatory(x))\nforall x (Rust(x) and Triploid(x) -> Choked(x))\nforall x (Choked(x) -> Rust(x))\nforall x (Triploid(x) -> not Rust(x))\nforall x (Rust(x) -> Appalled(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) and not Triploid(x) -> Appalled(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) and Triploid(x) -> not Appalled(x))\nforall x (Choked(x) and not Appalled(x) -> not Covariant(x))\n\nnot Rust(antonia)\n\ntherefore Rust(antonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Talia is cosmogenic. Orella is unexciting. Harriette is attacking. If someone is childlike then they are not unexciting. If someone is attacking and looseleaf then they are cosmogenic. If someone is cosmogenic then they are attacking. Furry people are not attacking. Blue people are childlike. If someone is winding and not looseleaf then they are childlike. All winding, looseleaf people are not childlike. If someone is cosmogenic and not childlike then they are not minded. Harriette is childlike.", "logic": "\nCosmogenic(talia)\nUnexciting(orella)\nAttacking(harriette)\nforall x (Childlike(x) -> not Unexciting(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Cosmogenic(x))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) -> Attacking(x))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> not Attacking(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) -> Childlike(x))\nforall x (Winding(x) and not Looseleaf(x) -> Childlike(x))\nforall x (Winding(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> not Childlike(x))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and not Childlike(x) -> not Minded(x))\n\nChildlike(harriette)\n\nAttacking(harriette) and forall x (Attacking(x) -> Childlike(x)) -> therefore Childlike(harriette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Horace is allopathic. Mimi is monstrous. Oberon is inaccurate. If someone is vaginal then they are not monstrous. If someone is inaccurate and nativist then they are allopathic. If someone is allopathic then they are inaccurate. Furry people are not inaccurate. Blue people are vaginal. If someone is disguised and not nativist then they are vaginal. All disguised, nativist people are not vaginal. If someone is allopathic and not vaginal then they are not unabused. Horace is not inaccurate.", "logic": "\nAllopathic(horace)\nMonstrous(mimi)\nInaccurate(oberon)\nforall x (Vaginal(x) -> not Monstrous(x))\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) and Nativist(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Inaccurate(x))\nforall x (Nativist(x) -> not Inaccurate(x))\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) -> Vaginal(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and not Nativist(x) -> Vaginal(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and Nativist(x) -> not Vaginal(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and not Vaginal(x) -> not Unabused(x))\n\nnot Inaccurate(horace)\n\nAllopathic(horace) and forall x (Allopathic(x) -> Inaccurate(x)) -> therefore Inaccurate(horace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Marylee is haywire. Benton is flavorous. Tally is senile. If someone is dissected then they are not flavorous. If someone is senile and exsanguine then they are haywire. If someone is haywire then they are senile. Furry people are not senile. Blue people are dissected. If someone is neritic and not exsanguine then they are dissected. All neritic, exsanguine people are not dissected. If someone is haywire and not dissected then they are not insulting. Marylee is dissected.", "logic": "\nHaywire(marylee)\nFlavorous(benton)\nSenile(tally)\nforall x (Dissected(x) -> not Flavorous(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) and Exsanguine(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Senile(x))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) -> not Senile(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Neritic(x) and not Exsanguine(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Neritic(x) and Exsanguine(x) -> not Dissected(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) and not Dissected(x) -> not Insulting(x))\n\nDissected(marylee)\n\nHaywire(marylee) and forall x (Haywire(x) -> Senile(x)) -> therefore Senile(marylee) Senile(marylee) and forall x (Senile(x) -> Dissected(x)) -> therefore Dissected(marylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Vito is labial. Henrieta is equivocal. Andreas is aglitter. If someone is described then they are not equivocal. If someone is aglitter and defunct then they are labial. If someone is labial then they are aglitter. Furry people are not aglitter. Blue people are described. If someone is broad and not defunct then they are described. All broad, defunct people are not described. If someone is labial and not described then they are not oratorical. Vito is not described.", "logic": "\nLabial(vito)\nEquivocal(henrieta)\nAglitter(andreas)\nforall x (Described(x) -> not Equivocal(x))\nforall x (Aglitter(x) and Defunct(x) -> Labial(x))\nforall x (Labial(x) -> Aglitter(x))\nforall x (Defunct(x) -> not Aglitter(x))\nforall x (Aglitter(x) -> Described(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) and not Defunct(x) -> Described(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) and Defunct(x) -> not Described(x))\nforall x (Labial(x) and not Described(x) -> not Oratorical(x))\n\nnot Described(vito)\n\nLabial(vito) and forall x (Labial(x) -> Aglitter(x)) -> therefore Aglitter(vito) Aglitter(vito) and forall x (Aglitter(x) -> Described(x)) -> therefore Described(vito)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Leon is hircine. Wenona is unlipped. Kala is warning. If someone is warmed then they are not unlipped. If someone is warning and motorized then they are hircine. If someone is hircine then they are warning. Furry people are not warning. Blue people are warmed. If someone is bacillar and not motorized then they are warmed. All bacillar, motorized people are not warmed. If someone is hircine and not warmed then they are not reptilian. Leon is not unlipped.", "logic": "\nHircine(leon)\nUnlipped(wenona)\nWarning(kala)\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> not Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and Motorized(x) -> Hircine(x))\nforall x (Hircine(x) -> Warning(x))\nforall x (Motorized(x) -> not Warning(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Bacillar(x) and not Motorized(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Bacillar(x) and Motorized(x) -> not Warmed(x))\nforall x (Hircine(x) and not Warmed(x) -> not Reptilian(x))\n\nnot Unlipped(leon)\n\nHircine(leon) and forall x (Hircine(x) -> Warning(x)) -> therefore Warning(leon) Warning(leon) and forall x (Warning(x) -> Warmed(x)) -> therefore Warmed(leon) Warmed(leon) and forall x (Warmed(x) -> not Unlipped(x)) -> therefore not Unlipped(leon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Carmela is analytic. Tonie is homegrown. Bellamy is synchronic. If someone is anabolic then they are not homegrown. If someone is synchronic and synoecious then they are analytic. If someone is analytic then they are synchronic. Furry people are not synchronic. Blue people are anabolic. If someone is fortemente and not synoecious then they are anabolic. All fortemente, synoecious people are not anabolic. If someone is analytic and not anabolic then they are not vinegarish. Carmela is homegrown.", "logic": "\nAnalytic(carmela)\nHomegrown(tonie)\nSynchronic(bellamy)\nforall x (Anabolic(x) -> not Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Synchronic(x) and Synoecious(x) -> Analytic(x))\nforall x (Analytic(x) -> Synchronic(x))\nforall x (Synoecious(x) -> not Synchronic(x))\nforall x (Synchronic(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and not Synoecious(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Synoecious(x) -> not Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Analytic(x) and not Anabolic(x) -> not Vinegarish(x))\n\nHomegrown(carmela)\n\nAnalytic(carmela) and forall x (Analytic(x) -> Synchronic(x)) -> therefore Synchronic(carmela) Synchronic(carmela) and forall x (Synchronic(x) -> Anabolic(x)) -> therefore Anabolic(carmela) Anabolic(carmela) and forall x (Anabolic(x) -> not Homegrown(x)) -> therefore not Homegrown(carmela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Riane is catoptric. Maxine is shimmery. Ossie is silvery. If someone is back then they are not shimmery. If someone is silvery and stomatous then they are catoptric. If someone is catoptric then they are silvery. Furry people are not silvery. Blue people are back. If someone is anarchical and not stomatous then they are back. All anarchical, stomatous people are not back. If someone is catoptric and not back then they are not zoftig. Maxine is not back.", "logic": "\nCatoptric(riane)\nShimmery(maxine)\nSilvery(ossie)\nforall x (Back(x) -> not Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Silvery(x) and Stomatous(x) -> Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Catoptric(x) -> Silvery(x))\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> not Silvery(x))\nforall x (Silvery(x) -> Back(x))\nforall x (Anarchical(x) and not Stomatous(x) -> Back(x))\nforall x (Anarchical(x) and Stomatous(x) -> not Back(x))\nforall x (Catoptric(x) and not Back(x) -> not Zoftig(x))\n\nnot Back(maxine)\n\nforall x (Silvery(x) -> Back(x)) <- forall x (Catoptric(x) -> Silvery(x)) <- forall x (Silvery(x) and Stomatous(x) -> Catoptric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Leta is hedonic. Pauline is reasonable. Nichols is papistic. If someone is unruly then they are not reasonable. If someone is papistic and nullified then they are hedonic. If someone is hedonic then they are papistic. Furry people are not papistic. Blue people are unruly. If someone is surviving and not nullified then they are unruly. All surviving, nullified people are not unruly. If someone is hedonic and not unruly then they are not disjunct. Nichols is hedonic.", "logic": "\nHedonic(leta)\nReasonable(pauline)\nPapistic(nichols)\nforall x (Unruly(x) -> not Reasonable(x))\nforall x (Papistic(x) and Nullified(x) -> Hedonic(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) -> Papistic(x))\nforall x (Nullified(x) -> not Papistic(x))\nforall x (Papistic(x) -> Unruly(x))\nforall x (Surviving(x) and not Nullified(x) -> Unruly(x))\nforall x (Surviving(x) and Nullified(x) -> not Unruly(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) and not Unruly(x) -> not Disjunct(x))\n\nHedonic(nichols)\n\nforall x (Papistic(x) and Nullified(x) -> Hedonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Hollie is befouled. Jess is agreeable. Shayna is situated. If someone is cloven then they are not agreeable. If someone is situated and lyonnaise then they are befouled. If someone is befouled then they are situated. Furry people are not situated. Blue people are cloven. If someone is northmost and not lyonnaise then they are cloven. All northmost, lyonnaise people are not cloven. If someone is befouled and not cloven then they are not untrained. Jess is not befouled.", "logic": "\nBefouled(hollie)\nAgreeable(jess)\nSituated(shayna)\nforall x (Cloven(x) -> not Agreeable(x))\nforall x (Situated(x) and Lyonnaise(x) -> Befouled(x))\nforall x (Befouled(x) -> Situated(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) -> not Situated(x))\nforall x (Situated(x) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and not Lyonnaise(x) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and Lyonnaise(x) -> not Cloven(x))\nforall x (Befouled(x) and not Cloven(x) -> not Untrained(x))\n\nnot Befouled(jess)\n\nforall x (Situated(x) and Lyonnaise(x) -> Befouled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Talyah is cyanophyte. Garrott is czech. Chan is blamed. If someone is skirting then they are not czech. If someone is blamed and bicameral then they are cyanophyte. If someone is cyanophyte then they are blamed. Furry people are not blamed. Blue people are skirting. If someone is grimy and not bicameral then they are skirting. All grimy, bicameral people are not skirting. If someone is cyanophyte and not skirting then they are not scapular. Garrott is blamed.", "logic": "\nCyanophyte(talyah)\nCzech(garrott)\nBlamed(chan)\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> not Czech(x))\nforall x (Blamed(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Cyanophyte(x))\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) -> Blamed(x))\nforall x (Bicameral(x) -> not Blamed(x))\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Grimy(x) and not Bicameral(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Grimy(x) and Bicameral(x) -> not Skirting(x))\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) and not Skirting(x) -> not Scapular(x))\n\nBlamed(garrott)\n\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) -> Blamed(x)) <- forall x (Blamed(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Cyanophyte(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Ericha is calculous. Cathrin is nicene. Emery is geniculate. If someone is encrusted then they are not nicene. If someone is geniculate and exclusive then they are calculous. If someone is calculous then they are geniculate. Furry people are not geniculate. Blue people are encrusted. If someone is busy and not exclusive then they are encrusted. All busy, exclusive people are not encrusted. If someone is calculous and not encrusted then they are not excusatory. Emery is not exclusive.", "logic": "\nCalculous(ericha)\nNicene(cathrin)\nGeniculate(emery)\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> not Nicene(x))\nforall x (Geniculate(x) and Exclusive(x) -> Calculous(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) -> Geniculate(x))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) -> not Geniculate(x))\nforall x (Geniculate(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Busy(x) and not Exclusive(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Busy(x) and Exclusive(x) -> not Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) and not Encrusted(x) -> not Excusatory(x))\n\nnot Exclusive(emery)\n\nnot Exclusive(emery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Andre is autogenous. Oran is eugenic. Jeffery is prenatal. If someone is impelled then they are not eugenic. If someone is prenatal and dizzy then they are autogenous. If someone is autogenous then they are prenatal. Furry people are not prenatal. Blue people are impelled. If someone is neurologic and not dizzy then they are impelled. All neurologic, dizzy people are not impelled. If someone is autogenous and not impelled then they are not duodenal. Oran is duodenal.", "logic": "\nAutogenous(andre)\nEugenic(oran)\nPrenatal(jeffery)\nforall x (Impelled(x) -> not Eugenic(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and Dizzy(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Autogenous(x) -> Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Dizzy(x) -> not Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and not Dizzy(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Dizzy(x) -> not Impelled(x))\nforall x (Autogenous(x) and not Impelled(x) -> not Duodenal(x))\n\nDuodenal(oran)\n\nDuodenal(oran) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Aurora is model. Madlen is unendowed. Waring is lost. If someone is burred then they are not unendowed. If someone is lost and stooped then they are model. If someone is model then they are lost. Furry people are not lost. Blue people are burred. If someone is lubricated and not stooped then they are burred. All lubricated, stooped people are not burred. If someone is model and not burred then they are not unexpired. Waring is not unexpired.", "logic": "\nModel(aurora)\nUnendowed(madlen)\nLost(waring)\nforall x (Burred(x) -> not Unendowed(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) and Stooped(x) -> Model(x))\nforall x (Model(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Stooped(x) -> not Lost(x))\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Burred(x))\nforall x (Lubricated(x) and not Stooped(x) -> Burred(x))\nforall x (Lubricated(x) and Stooped(x) -> not Burred(x))\nforall x (Model(x) and not Burred(x) -> not Unexpired(x))\n\nnot Unexpired(waring)\n\nnot Unexpired(waring) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Nikita is mystifying. Martica is unfaceted. Starla is ignoble. If someone is osteal then they are not unfaceted. If someone is ignoble and volumetric then they are mystifying. If someone is mystifying then they are ignoble. Furry people are not ignoble. Blue people are osteal. If someone is cybernetic and not volumetric then they are osteal. All cybernetic, volumetric people are not osteal. If someone is mystifying and not osteal then they are not convenient. Nikita is volumetric.", "logic": "\nMystifying(nikita)\nUnfaceted(martica)\nIgnoble(starla)\nforall x (Osteal(x) -> not Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Ignoble(x) and Volumetric(x) -> Mystifying(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) -> Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) -> not Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Osteal(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) and not Volumetric(x) -> Osteal(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) and Volumetric(x) -> not Osteal(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) and not Osteal(x) -> not Convenient(x))\n\nVolumetric(nikita)\n\nVolumetric(nikita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Daveen is veritable. If someone is veritable and dank then they are loveable. If someone is unloving then they are loveable. If someone is fickle and unloving then they are not loveable. If someone is loveable then they are unloving. If someone is unloving and hairlike then they are subaquatic. White people are dank. Daveen is veritable.", "logic": "\nVeritable(daveen)\nforall x (Veritable(x) and Dank(x) -> Loveable(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Loveable(x))\nforall x (Fickle(x) and Unloving(x) -> not Loveable(x))\nforall x (Loveable(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) and Hairlike(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\nforall x (Veritable(x) -> Dank(x))\n\nVeritable(daveen)\n\ntherefore Veritable(daveen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Virgina is hexangular. If someone is hexangular and diverting then they are unhurt. If someone is ransomed then they are unhurt. If someone is sappy and ransomed then they are not unhurt. If someone is unhurt then they are ransomed. If someone is ransomed and spry then they are mighty. White people are diverting. Virgina is not hexangular.", "logic": "\nHexangular(virgina)\nforall x (Hexangular(x) and Diverting(x) -> Unhurt(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) -> Unhurt(x))\nforall x (Sappy(x) and Ransomed(x) -> not Unhurt(x))\nforall x (Unhurt(x) -> Ransomed(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Spry(x) -> Mighty(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) -> Diverting(x))\n\nnot Hexangular(virgina)\n\ntherefore Hexangular(virgina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Allissa is phantom. If someone is phantom and dismaying then they are slippery. If someone is bally then they are slippery. If someone is uveous and bally then they are not slippery. If someone is slippery then they are bally. If someone is bally and unratable then they are overhasty. White people are dismaying. Allissa is dismaying.", "logic": "\nPhantom(allissa)\nforall x (Phantom(x) and Dismaying(x) -> Slippery(x))\nforall x (Bally(x) -> Slippery(x))\nforall x (Uveous(x) and Bally(x) -> not Slippery(x))\nforall x (Slippery(x) -> Bally(x))\nforall x (Bally(x) and Unratable(x) -> Overhasty(x))\nforall x (Phantom(x) -> Dismaying(x))\n\nDismaying(allissa)\n\nPhantom(allissa) and forall x (Phantom(x) -> Dismaying(x)) -> therefore Dismaying(allissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Torrey is colourless. If someone is colourless and paraplegic then they are temporary. If someone is unkind then they are temporary. If someone is affixal and unkind then they are not temporary. If someone is temporary then they are unkind. If someone is unkind and urceolate then they are isotopic. White people are paraplegic. Torrey is not paraplegic.", "logic": "\nColourless(torrey)\nforall x (Colourless(x) and Paraplegic(x) -> Temporary(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Temporary(x))\nforall x (Affixal(x) and Unkind(x) -> not Temporary(x))\nforall x (Temporary(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Unkind(x) and Urceolate(x) -> Isotopic(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\n\nnot Paraplegic(torrey)\n\nColourless(torrey) and forall x (Colourless(x) -> Paraplegic(x)) -> therefore Paraplegic(torrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Horatia is teentsy. If someone is teentsy and plaguey then they are tilled. If someone is ebony then they are tilled. If someone is entangled and ebony then they are not tilled. If someone is tilled then they are ebony. If someone is ebony and ferny then they are obtuse. White people are plaguey. Horatia is tilled.", "logic": "\nTeentsy(horatia)\nforall x (Teentsy(x) and Plaguey(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Ebony(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Entangled(x) and Ebony(x) -> not Tilled(x))\nforall x (Tilled(x) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Ebony(x) and Ferny(x) -> Obtuse(x))\nforall x (Teentsy(x) -> Plaguey(x))\n\nTilled(horatia)\n\nTeentsy(horatia) and forall x (Teentsy(x) -> Plaguey(x)) -> therefore Plaguey(horatia) Teentsy(horatia) and Plaguey(horatia) and forall x (Teentsy(x) and Plaguey(x) -> Tilled(x)) -> therefore Tilled(horatia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Temp is crotchety. If someone is crotchety and renewed then they are endozoan. If someone is strep then they are endozoan. If someone is directing and strep then they are not endozoan. If someone is endozoan then they are strep. If someone is strep and cairned then they are virile. White people are renewed. Temp is not endozoan.", "logic": "\nCrotchety(temp)\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Renewed(x) -> Endozoan(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Endozoan(x))\nforall x (Directing(x) and Strep(x) -> not Endozoan(x))\nforall x (Endozoan(x) -> Strep(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) and Cairned(x) -> Virile(x))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) -> Renewed(x))\n\nnot Endozoan(temp)\n\nCrotchety(temp) and forall x (Crotchety(x) -> Renewed(x)) -> therefore Renewed(temp) Crotchety(temp) and Renewed(temp) and forall x (Crotchety(x) and Renewed(x) -> Endozoan(x)) -> therefore Endozoan(temp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Berenice is fetid. If someone is fetid and parasitic then they are noiseless. If someone is impersonal then they are noiseless. If someone is untangled and impersonal then they are not noiseless. If someone is noiseless then they are impersonal. If someone is impersonal and gambian then they are mutative. White people are parasitic. Berenice is impersonal.", "logic": "\nFetid(berenice)\nforall x (Fetid(x) and Parasitic(x) -> Noiseless(x))\nforall x (Impersonal(x) -> Noiseless(x))\nforall x (Untangled(x) and Impersonal(x) -> not Noiseless(x))\nforall x (Noiseless(x) -> Impersonal(x))\nforall x (Impersonal(x) and Gambian(x) -> Mutative(x))\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Parasitic(x))\n\nImpersonal(berenice)\n\nFetid(berenice) and forall x (Fetid(x) -> Parasitic(x)) -> therefore Parasitic(berenice) Fetid(berenice) and Parasitic(berenice) and forall x (Fetid(x) and Parasitic(x) -> Noiseless(x)) -> therefore Noiseless(berenice) Noiseless(berenice) and forall x (Noiseless(x) -> Impersonal(x)) -> therefore Impersonal(berenice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Dafna is four. If someone is four and bacterial then they are granted. If someone is syntactic then they are granted. If someone is pyramidic and syntactic then they are not granted. If someone is granted then they are syntactic. If someone is syntactic and aculeated then they are unafraid. White people are bacterial. Dafna is not syntactic.", "logic": "\nFour(dafna)\nforall x (Four(x) and Bacterial(x) -> Granted(x))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) -> Granted(x))\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) and Syntactic(x) -> not Granted(x))\nforall x (Granted(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) and Aculeated(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Four(x) -> Bacterial(x))\n\nnot Syntactic(dafna)\n\nFour(dafna) and forall x (Four(x) -> Bacterial(x)) -> therefore Bacterial(dafna) Four(dafna) and Bacterial(dafna) and forall x (Four(x) and Bacterial(x) -> Granted(x)) -> therefore Granted(dafna) Granted(dafna) and forall x (Granted(x) -> Syntactic(x)) -> therefore Syntactic(dafna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Wait is bulbaceous. If someone is bulbaceous and shaping then they are gabonese. If someone is unjust then they are gabonese. If someone is erotic and unjust then they are not gabonese. If someone is gabonese then they are unjust. If someone is unjust and scorbutic then they are isogonic. White people are shaping. Wait is not isogonic.", "logic": "\nBulbaceous(wait)\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) and Shaping(x) -> Gabonese(x))\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Gabonese(x))\nforall x (Erotic(x) and Unjust(x) -> not Gabonese(x))\nforall x (Gabonese(x) -> Unjust(x))\nforall x (Unjust(x) and Scorbutic(x) -> Isogonic(x))\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Shaping(x))\n\nnot Isogonic(wait)\n\nforall x (Unjust(x) and Scorbutic(x) -> Isogonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Coretta is slithering. If someone is slithering and pubic then they are newborn. If someone is practiced then they are newborn. If someone is andorran and practiced then they are not newborn. If someone is newborn then they are practiced. If someone is practiced and sick then they are ellipsoid. White people are pubic. Coretta is andorran.", "logic": "\nSlithering(coretta)\nforall x (Slithering(x) and Pubic(x) -> Newborn(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Newborn(x))\nforall x (Andorran(x) and Practiced(x) -> not Newborn(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) and Sick(x) -> Ellipsoid(x))\nforall x (Slithering(x) -> Pubic(x))\n\nAndorran(coretta)\n\nAndorran(coretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Catlaina is knobbly. Catlaina is invitatory. Catlaina is wordless. Catlaina is dyspneic. Catlaina is semitropic. Catlaina is carven. Jabez is knobbly. Jabez is invitatory. Jabez is dyspneic. Jabez is regal. All carven things are semitropic. If something is invitatory then it is carven. Green, knobbly things are dyspneic. All carven things are dyspneic. If Jabez is semitropic and Jabez is dyspneic then Jabez is not wordless. If something is dyspneic and not invitatory then it is regal. Catlaina is dyspneic.", "logic": "\nKnobbly(catlaina)\nInvitatory(catlaina)\nWordless(catlaina)\nDyspneic(catlaina)\nSemitropic(catlaina)\nCarven(catlaina)\nKnobbly(jabez)\nInvitatory(jabez)\nDyspneic(jabez)\nRegal(jabez)\nforall x (Carven(x) -> Semitropic(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Carven(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) and Knobbly(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nforall x (Carven(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nSemitropic(jabez) and Dyspneic(jabez) -> not Wordless(jabez)\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) and not Invitatory(x) -> Regal(x))\n\nDyspneic(catlaina)\n\ntherefore Dyspneic(catlaina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Jeane is minty. Jeane is gullible. Jeane is ensuant. Jeane is underclass. Jeane is leaded. Jeane is pyramidic. Gwenn is minty. Gwenn is gullible. Gwenn is underclass. Gwenn is antepartum. All pyramidic things are leaded. If something is gullible then it is pyramidic. Green, minty things are underclass. All pyramidic things are underclass. If Gwenn is leaded and Gwenn is underclass then Gwenn is not ensuant. If something is underclass and not gullible then it is antepartum. Jeane is not gullible.", "logic": "\nMinty(jeane)\nGullible(jeane)\nEnsuant(jeane)\nUnderclass(jeane)\nLeaded(jeane)\nPyramidic(jeane)\nMinty(gwenn)\nGullible(gwenn)\nUnderclass(gwenn)\nAntepartum(gwenn)\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) -> Leaded(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) and Minty(x) -> Underclass(x))\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) -> Underclass(x))\nLeaded(gwenn) and Underclass(gwenn) -> not Ensuant(gwenn)\nforall x (Underclass(x) and not Gullible(x) -> Antepartum(x))\n\nnot Gullible(jeane)\n\ntherefore Gullible(jeane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Kori is sinuate. Kori is salted. Kori is unturned. Kori is nonexempt. Kori is suasible. Kori is steerable. Morissa is sinuate. Morissa is salted. Morissa is nonexempt. Morissa is inconstant. All steerable things are suasible. If something is salted then it is steerable. Green, sinuate things are nonexempt. All steerable things are nonexempt. If Morissa is suasible and Morissa is nonexempt then Morissa is not unturned. If something is nonexempt and not salted then it is inconstant. Morissa is steerable.", "logic": "\nSinuate(kori)\nSalted(kori)\nUnturned(kori)\nNonexempt(kori)\nSuasible(kori)\nSteerable(kori)\nSinuate(morissa)\nSalted(morissa)\nNonexempt(morissa)\nInconstant(morissa)\nforall x (Steerable(x) -> Suasible(x))\nforall x (Salted(x) -> Steerable(x))\nforall x (Salted(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\nforall x (Steerable(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\nSuasible(morissa) and Nonexempt(morissa) -> not Unturned(morissa)\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) and not Salted(x) -> Inconstant(x))\n\nSteerable(morissa)\n\nSalted(morissa) and forall x (Salted(x) -> Steerable(x)) -> therefore Steerable(morissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Carolyn is aweless. Carolyn is upstair. Carolyn is imperial. Carolyn is figural. Carolyn is phoenician. Carolyn is metastable. Theresina is aweless. Theresina is upstair. Theresina is figural. Theresina is uncounted. All metastable things are phoenician. If something is upstair then it is metastable. Green, aweless things are figural. All metastable things are figural. If Theresina is phoenician and Theresina is figural then Theresina is not imperial. If something is figural and not upstair then it is uncounted. Theresina is not metastable.", "logic": "\nAweless(carolyn)\nUpstair(carolyn)\nImperial(carolyn)\nFigural(carolyn)\nPhoenician(carolyn)\nMetastable(carolyn)\nAweless(theresina)\nUpstair(theresina)\nFigural(theresina)\nUncounted(theresina)\nforall x (Metastable(x) -> Phoenician(x))\nforall x (Upstair(x) -> Metastable(x))\nforall x (Upstair(x) and Aweless(x) -> Figural(x))\nforall x (Metastable(x) -> Figural(x))\nPhoenician(theresina) and Figural(theresina) -> not Imperial(theresina)\nforall x (Figural(x) and not Upstair(x) -> Uncounted(x))\n\nnot Metastable(theresina)\n\nUpstair(theresina) and forall x (Upstair(x) -> Metastable(x)) -> therefore Metastable(theresina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Shell is mailed. Shell is zonal. Shell is slipping. Shell is piscine. Shell is eligible. Shell is moist. Agace is mailed. Agace is zonal. Agace is piscine. Agace is disyllabic. All moist things are eligible. If something is zonal then it is moist. Green, mailed things are piscine. All moist things are piscine. If Agace is eligible and Agace is piscine then Agace is not slipping. If something is piscine and not zonal then it is disyllabic. Agace is eligible.", "logic": "\nMailed(shell)\nZonal(shell)\nSlipping(shell)\nPiscine(shell)\nEligible(shell)\nMoist(shell)\nMailed(agace)\nZonal(agace)\nPiscine(agace)\nDisyllabic(agace)\nforall x (Moist(x) -> Eligible(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) -> Moist(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Mailed(x) -> Piscine(x))\nforall x (Moist(x) -> Piscine(x))\nEligible(agace) and Piscine(agace) -> not Slipping(agace)\nforall x (Piscine(x) and not Zonal(x) -> Disyllabic(x))\n\nEligible(agace)\n\nZonal(agace) and forall x (Zonal(x) -> Moist(x)) -> therefore Moist(agace) Moist(agace) and forall x (Moist(x) -> Eligible(x)) -> therefore Eligible(agace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Oliy is provincial. Oliy is distracted. Oliy is xxxii. Oliy is impacted. Oliy is defeated. Oliy is lxxxv. Gonzalo is provincial. Gonzalo is distracted. Gonzalo is impacted. Gonzalo is comforted. All lxxxv things are defeated. If something is distracted then it is lxxxv. Green, provincial things are impacted. All lxxxv things are impacted. If Gonzalo is defeated and Gonzalo is impacted then Gonzalo is not xxxii. If something is impacted and not distracted then it is comforted. Gonzalo is not defeated.", "logic": "\nProvincial(oliy)\nDistracted(oliy)\nXxxii(oliy)\nImpacted(oliy)\nDefeated(oliy)\nLxxxv(oliy)\nProvincial(gonzalo)\nDistracted(gonzalo)\nImpacted(gonzalo)\nComforted(gonzalo)\nforall x (Lxxxv(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) -> Lxxxv(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) and Provincial(x) -> Impacted(x))\nforall x (Lxxxv(x) -> Impacted(x))\nDefeated(gonzalo) and Impacted(gonzalo) -> not Xxxii(gonzalo)\nforall x (Impacted(x) and not Distracted(x) -> Comforted(x))\n\nnot Defeated(gonzalo)\n\nDistracted(gonzalo) and forall x (Distracted(x) -> Lxxxv(x)) -> therefore Lxxxv(gonzalo) Lxxxv(gonzalo) and forall x (Lxxxv(x) -> Defeated(x)) -> therefore Defeated(gonzalo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Trish is imbecilic. Trish is stern. Trish is transitory. Trish is catamenial. Trish is exemplary. Trish is bimonthly. Verile is imbecilic. Verile is stern. Verile is catamenial. Verile is ratlike. All bimonthly things are exemplary. If something is stern then it is bimonthly. Green, imbecilic things are catamenial. All bimonthly things are catamenial. If Verile is exemplary and Verile is catamenial then Verile is not transitory. If something is catamenial and not stern then it is ratlike. Verile is not transitory.", "logic": "\nImbecilic(trish)\nStern(trish)\nTransitory(trish)\nCatamenial(trish)\nExemplary(trish)\nBimonthly(trish)\nImbecilic(verile)\nStern(verile)\nCatamenial(verile)\nRatlike(verile)\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Bimonthly(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) and Imbecilic(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nExemplary(verile) and Catamenial(verile) -> not Transitory(verile)\nforall x (Catamenial(x) and not Stern(x) -> Ratlike(x))\n\nnot Transitory(verile)\n\nStern(verile) and forall x (Stern(x) -> Bimonthly(x)) -> therefore Bimonthly(verile) Bimonthly(verile) and forall x (Bimonthly(x) -> Exemplary(x)) -> therefore Exemplary(verile) Exemplary(verile) and Catamenial(verile) and Exemplary(verile) and Catamenial(verile) -> not Transitory(verile) -> therefore not Transitory(verile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Phaidra is batrachian. Phaidra is unseeable. Phaidra is fixed. Phaidra is creedal. Phaidra is perilous. Phaidra is obtrusive. Arnoldo is batrachian. Arnoldo is unseeable. Arnoldo is creedal. Arnoldo is anosmic. All obtrusive things are perilous. If something is unseeable then it is obtrusive. Green, batrachian things are creedal. All obtrusive things are creedal. If Arnoldo is perilous and Arnoldo is creedal then Arnoldo is not fixed. If something is creedal and not unseeable then it is anosmic. Arnoldo is fixed.", "logic": "\nBatrachian(phaidra)\nUnseeable(phaidra)\nFixed(phaidra)\nCreedal(phaidra)\nPerilous(phaidra)\nObtrusive(phaidra)\nBatrachian(arnoldo)\nUnseeable(arnoldo)\nCreedal(arnoldo)\nAnosmic(arnoldo)\nforall x (Obtrusive(x) -> Perilous(x))\nforall x (Unseeable(x) -> Obtrusive(x))\nforall x (Unseeable(x) and Batrachian(x) -> Creedal(x))\nforall x (Obtrusive(x) -> Creedal(x))\nPerilous(arnoldo) and Creedal(arnoldo) -> not Fixed(arnoldo)\nforall x (Creedal(x) and not Unseeable(x) -> Anosmic(x))\n\nFixed(arnoldo)\n\nUnseeable(arnoldo) and forall x (Unseeable(x) -> Obtrusive(x)) -> therefore Obtrusive(arnoldo) Obtrusive(arnoldo) and forall x (Obtrusive(x) -> Perilous(x)) -> therefore Perilous(arnoldo) Perilous(arnoldo) and Creedal(arnoldo) and Perilous(arnoldo) and Creedal(arnoldo) -> not Fixed(arnoldo) -> therefore not Fixed(arnoldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "The steward is lanky. If someone is moral then they are not corymbose. If someone is gummed and liveried then they are corymbose. If someone is lanky then they are gummed. All lanky people are not moral. If someone is moral then they are liveried. Nice people are liveried. The steward is lanky.", "logic": "\nLanky(steward)\nforall x (Moral(x) -> not Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) and Liveried(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Lanky(x) -> Gummed(x))\nforall x (Lanky(x) -> not Moral(x))\nforall x (Moral(x) -> Liveried(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Liveried(x))\n\nLanky(steward)\n\ntherefore Lanky(steward)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The jenelle is papal. If someone is awol then they are not vibratory. If someone is vinaceous and jolting then they are vibratory. If someone is papal then they are vinaceous. All papal people are not awol. If someone is awol then they are jolting. Nice people are jolting. The jenelle is not papal.", "logic": "\nPapal(jenelle)\nforall x (Awol(x) -> not Vibratory(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) and Jolting(x) -> Vibratory(x))\nforall x (Papal(x) -> Vinaceous(x))\nforall x (Papal(x) -> not Awol(x))\nforall x (Awol(x) -> Jolting(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Jolting(x))\n\nnot Papal(jenelle)\n\ntherefore Papal(jenelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The noemi is overstated. If someone is gone then they are not spacey. If someone is extremist and agnostical then they are spacey. If someone is overstated then they are extremist. All overstated people are not gone. If someone is gone then they are agnostical. Nice people are agnostical. The noemi is extremist.", "logic": "\nOverstated(noemi)\nforall x (Gone(x) -> not Spacey(x))\nforall x (Extremist(x) and Agnostical(x) -> Spacey(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> Extremist(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> not Gone(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Extremist(x) -> Agnostical(x))\n\nExtremist(noemi)\n\nOverstated(noemi) and forall x (Overstated(x) -> Extremist(x)) -> therefore Extremist(noemi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The breena is clinical. If someone is drafty then they are not meddling. If someone is geometric and unstudious then they are meddling. If someone is clinical then they are geometric. All clinical people are not drafty. If someone is drafty then they are unstudious. Nice people are unstudious. The breena is drafty.", "logic": "\nClinical(breena)\nforall x (Drafty(x) -> not Meddling(x))\nforall x (Geometric(x) and Unstudious(x) -> Meddling(x))\nforall x (Clinical(x) -> Geometric(x))\nforall x (Clinical(x) -> not Drafty(x))\nforall x (Drafty(x) -> Unstudious(x))\nforall x (Geometric(x) -> Unstudious(x))\n\nDrafty(breena)\n\nClinical(breena) and forall x (Clinical(x) -> not Drafty(x)) -> therefore not Drafty(breena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The hope is sandpapery. If someone is tactical then they are not cyclonical. If someone is oldish and recurved then they are cyclonical. If someone is sandpapery then they are oldish. All sandpapery people are not tactical. If someone is tactical then they are recurved. Nice people are recurved. The hope is recurved.", "logic": "\nSandpapery(hope)\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> not Cyclonical(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) and Recurved(x) -> Cyclonical(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> not Tactical(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Recurved(x))\nforall x (Oldish(x) -> Recurved(x))\n\nRecurved(hope)\n\nSandpapery(hope) and forall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Oldish(x)) -> therefore Oldish(hope) Oldish(hope) and forall x (Oldish(x) -> Recurved(x)) -> therefore Recurved(hope)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The zarla is slashed. If someone is whiplike then they are not unmedical. If someone is obscene and fazed then they are unmedical. If someone is slashed then they are obscene. All slashed people are not whiplike. If someone is whiplike then they are fazed. Nice people are fazed. The zarla is not fazed.", "logic": "\nSlashed(zarla)\nforall x (Whiplike(x) -> not Unmedical(x))\nforall x (Obscene(x) and Fazed(x) -> Unmedical(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Obscene(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> not Whiplike(x))\nforall x (Whiplike(x) -> Fazed(x))\nforall x (Obscene(x) -> Fazed(x))\n\nnot Fazed(zarla)\n\nSlashed(zarla) and forall x (Slashed(x) -> Obscene(x)) -> therefore Obscene(zarla) Obscene(zarla) and forall x (Obscene(x) -> Fazed(x)) -> therefore Fazed(zarla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The andie is ersatz. If someone is accentual then they are not dermal. If someone is baric and nonextant then they are dermal. If someone is ersatz then they are baric. All ersatz people are not accentual. If someone is accentual then they are nonextant. Nice people are nonextant. The andie is dermal.", "logic": "\nErsatz(andie)\nforall x (Accentual(x) -> not Dermal(x))\nforall x (Baric(x) and Nonextant(x) -> Dermal(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) -> Baric(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) -> not Accentual(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) -> Nonextant(x))\nforall x (Baric(x) -> Nonextant(x))\n\nDermal(andie)\n\nErsatz(andie) and forall x (Ersatz(x) -> Baric(x)) -> therefore Baric(andie) Ersatz(andie) and forall x (Ersatz(x) -> Baric(x)) -> therefore Baric(andie) Baric(andie) and forall x (Baric(x) -> Nonextant(x)) -> therefore Nonextant(andie) Baric(andie) and Nonextant(andie) and forall x (Baric(x) and Nonextant(x) -> Dermal(x)) -> therefore Dermal(andie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The raine is saddled. If someone is dexterous then they are not floury. If someone is pastoral and lightproof then they are floury. If someone is saddled then they are pastoral. All saddled people are not dexterous. If someone is dexterous then they are lightproof. Nice people are lightproof. The raine is not floury.", "logic": "\nSaddled(raine)\nforall x (Dexterous(x) -> not Floury(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) and Lightproof(x) -> Floury(x))\nforall x (Saddled(x) -> Pastoral(x))\nforall x (Saddled(x) -> not Dexterous(x))\nforall x (Dexterous(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) -> Lightproof(x))\n\nnot Floury(raine)\n\nSaddled(raine) and forall x (Saddled(x) -> Pastoral(x)) -> therefore Pastoral(raine) Saddled(raine) and forall x (Saddled(x) -> Pastoral(x)) -> therefore Pastoral(raine) Pastoral(raine) and forall x (Pastoral(x) -> Lightproof(x)) -> therefore Lightproof(raine) Pastoral(raine) and Lightproof(raine) and forall x (Pastoral(x) and Lightproof(x) -> Floury(x)) -> therefore Floury(raine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The helaine is respective. If someone is humorless then they are not epicene. If someone is indirect and eighty then they are epicene. If someone is respective then they are indirect. All respective people are not humorless. If someone is humorless then they are eighty. Nice people are eighty. The helaine does not see the helaine.", "logic": "\nRespective(helaine)\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> not Epicene(x))\nforall x (Indirect(x) and Eighty(x) -> Epicene(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Indirect(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> not Humorless(x))\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Eighty(x))\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> Eighty(x))\n\nnot Sees(helaine, helaine)\n\nnot Sees(helaine, helaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The jesus is popeyed. If someone is dioestrual then they are not clubbable. If someone is lovelorn and perigonal then they are clubbable. If someone is popeyed then they are lovelorn. All popeyed people are not dioestrual. If someone is dioestrual then they are perigonal. Nice people are perigonal. The jesus eats the jesus.", "logic": "\nPopeyed(jesus)\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) -> not Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) -> not Dioestrual(x))\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) -> Perigonal(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Perigonal(x))\n\nEats(jesus, jesus)\n\nEats(jesus, jesus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The reeba drool the ransell. The reeba drool the ludwig. The reeba graze the ransell. The lazaro is thin. The lazaro catabolise the ludwig. The ransell is nacreous. The ransell graze the reeba. The ransell graze the lazaro. The ludwig is solid. The ludwig catabolise the ransell. If something graze the lazaro then it is wealthy. If something is untwisted then it is thin. If the ludwig catabolise the lazaro then the ludwig graze the ransell. If something graze the lazaro and the lazaro drool the ransell then the lazaro graze the ransell. If something catabolise the lazaro then the lazaro catabolise the reeba. If the ludwig is untwisted and the ludwig graze the ransell then the ludwig catabolise the lazaro. If something catabolise the ransell and it catabolise the lazaro then it catabolise the reeba. All nacreous, wealthy things are untwisted. The lazaro catabolise the ludwig.", "logic": "\nDrool(reeba, ransell)\nDrool(reeba, ludwig)\nGraze(reeba, ransell)\nThin(lazaro)\nCatabolise(lazaro, ludwig)\nNacreous(ransell)\nGraze(ransell, reeba)\nGraze(ransell, lazaro)\nSolid(ludwig)\nCatabolise(ludwig, ransell)\nforall x (Graze(x, lazaro) -> Wealthy(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Thin(x))\nCatabolise(ludwig, lazaro) -> Graze(ludwig, ransell)\nforall x (Graze(x, lazaro) and Drool(lazaro, ransell) -> Graze(lazaro, ransell))\nforall x (Catabolise(x, lazaro) -> Catabolise(lazaro, reeba))\nUntwisted(ludwig) and Graze(ludwig, ransell) -> Catabolise(ludwig, lazaro)\nforall x (Catabolise(x, ransell) and Catabolise(x, lazaro) -> Catabolise(x, reeba))\nforall x (Nacreous(x) and Wealthy(x) -> Untwisted(x))\n\nCatabolise(lazaro, ludwig)\n\ntherefore Catabolise(lazaro, ludwig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The chalmers vacillate the elsey. The chalmers vacillate the idette. The chalmers crescendo the elsey. The harv is fueled. The harv joust the idette. The elsey is exchanged. The elsey crescendo the chalmers. The elsey crescendo the harv. The idette is burbling. The idette joust the elsey. If something crescendo the harv then it is hardbacked. If something is nazarene then it is fueled. If the idette joust the harv then the idette crescendo the elsey. If something crescendo the harv and the harv vacillate the elsey then the harv crescendo the elsey. If something joust the harv then the harv joust the chalmers. If the idette is nazarene and the idette crescendo the elsey then the idette joust the harv. If something joust the elsey and it joust the harv then it joust the chalmers. All exchanged, hardbacked things are nazarene. The chalmers does not like the elsey.", "logic": "\nVacillate(chalmers, elsey)\nVacillate(chalmers, idette)\nCrescendo(chalmers, elsey)\nFueled(harv)\nJoust(harv, idette)\nExchanged(elsey)\nCrescendo(elsey, chalmers)\nCrescendo(elsey, harv)\nBurbling(idette)\nJoust(idette, elsey)\nforall x (Crescendo(x, harv) -> Hardbacked(x))\nforall x (Nazarene(x) -> Fueled(x))\nJoust(idette, harv) -> Crescendo(idette, elsey)\nforall x (Crescendo(x, harv) and Vacillate(harv, elsey) -> Crescendo(harv, elsey))\nforall x (Joust(x, harv) -> Joust(harv, chalmers))\nNazarene(idette) and Crescendo(idette, elsey) -> Joust(idette, harv)\nforall x (Joust(x, elsey) and Joust(x, harv) -> Joust(x, chalmers))\nforall x (Exchanged(x) and Hardbacked(x) -> Nazarene(x))\n\nnot Crescendo(chalmers, elsey)\n\ntherefore Crescendo(chalmers, elsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The missie auscultate the kory. The missie auscultate the laird. The missie debone the kory. The thomasine is placoid. The thomasine bedight the laird. The kory is uncritical. The kory debone the missie. The kory debone the thomasine. The laird is seamed. The laird bedight the kory. If something debone the thomasine then it is cenobitic. If something is shelled then it is placoid. If the laird bedight the thomasine then the laird debone the kory. If something debone the thomasine and the thomasine auscultate the kory then the thomasine debone the kory. If something bedight the thomasine then the thomasine bedight the missie. If the laird is shelled and the laird debone the kory then the laird bedight the thomasine. If something bedight the kory and it bedight the thomasine then it bedight the missie. All uncritical, cenobitic things are shelled. The kory is cenobitic.", "logic": "\nAuscultate(missie, kory)\nAuscultate(missie, laird)\nDebone(missie, kory)\nPlacoid(thomasine)\nBedight(thomasine, laird)\nUncritical(kory)\nDebone(kory, missie)\nDebone(kory, thomasine)\nSeamed(laird)\nBedight(laird, kory)\nforall x (Debone(x, thomasine) -> Cenobitic(x))\nforall x (Shelled(x) -> Placoid(x))\nBedight(laird, thomasine) -> Debone(laird, kory)\nforall x (Debone(x, thomasine) and Auscultate(thomasine, kory) -> Debone(thomasine, kory))\nforall x (Bedight(x, thomasine) -> Bedight(thomasine, missie))\nShelled(laird) and Debone(laird, kory) -> Bedight(laird, thomasine)\nforall x (Bedight(x, kory) and Bedight(x, thomasine) -> Bedight(x, missie))\nforall x (Uncritical(x) and Cenobitic(x) -> Shelled(x))\n\nCenobitic(kory)\n\nDebone(kory, thomasine) and forall x (Debone(x, thomasine) -> Cenobitic(x)) -> therefore Cenobitic(kory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The vin wallpaper the luisa. The vin wallpaper the conny. The vin nibble the luisa. The marchall is haemal. The marchall automobile the conny. The luisa is clinched. The luisa nibble the vin. The luisa nibble the marchall. The conny is afire. The conny automobile the luisa. If something nibble the marchall then it is corked. If something is biblical then it is haemal. If the conny automobile the marchall then the conny nibble the luisa. If something nibble the marchall and the marchall wallpaper the luisa then the marchall nibble the luisa. If something automobile the marchall then the marchall automobile the vin. If the conny is biblical and the conny nibble the luisa then the conny automobile the marchall. If something automobile the luisa and it automobile the marchall then it automobile the vin. All clinched, corked things are biblical. The luisa is not corked.", "logic": "\nWallpaper(vin, luisa)\nWallpaper(vin, conny)\nNibble(vin, luisa)\nHaemal(marchall)\nAutomobile(marchall, conny)\nClinched(luisa)\nNibble(luisa, vin)\nNibble(luisa, marchall)\nAfire(conny)\nAutomobile(conny, luisa)\nforall x (Nibble(x, marchall) -> Corked(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) -> Haemal(x))\nAutomobile(conny, marchall) -> Nibble(conny, luisa)\nforall x (Nibble(x, marchall) and Wallpaper(marchall, luisa) -> Nibble(marchall, luisa))\nforall x (Automobile(x, marchall) -> Automobile(marchall, vin))\nBiblical(conny) and Nibble(conny, luisa) -> Automobile(conny, marchall)\nforall x (Automobile(x, luisa) and Automobile(x, marchall) -> Automobile(x, vin))\nforall x (Clinched(x) and Corked(x) -> Biblical(x))\n\nnot Corked(luisa)\n\nNibble(luisa, marchall) and forall x (Nibble(x, marchall) -> Corked(x)) -> therefore Corked(luisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The gerrit mutter the grata. The gerrit mutter the cornelius. The gerrit wonder the grata. The kent is maroon. The kent bill the cornelius. The grata is rusted. The grata wonder the gerrit. The grata wonder the kent. The cornelius is unpainful. The cornelius bill the grata. If something wonder the kent then it is centroidal. If something is enceinte then it is maroon. If the cornelius bill the kent then the cornelius wonder the grata. If something wonder the kent and the kent mutter the grata then the kent wonder the grata. If something bill the kent then the kent bill the gerrit. If the cornelius is enceinte and the cornelius wonder the grata then the cornelius bill the kent. If something bill the grata and it bill the kent then it bill the gerrit. All rusted, centroidal things are enceinte. The grata is enceinte.", "logic": "\nMutter(gerrit, grata)\nMutter(gerrit, cornelius)\nWonder(gerrit, grata)\nMaroon(kent)\nBill(kent, cornelius)\nRusted(grata)\nWonder(grata, gerrit)\nWonder(grata, kent)\nUnpainful(cornelius)\nBill(cornelius, grata)\nforall x (Wonder(x, kent) -> Centroidal(x))\nforall x (Enceinte(x) -> Maroon(x))\nBill(cornelius, kent) -> Wonder(cornelius, grata)\nforall x (Wonder(x, kent) and Mutter(kent, grata) -> Wonder(kent, grata))\nforall x (Bill(x, kent) -> Bill(kent, gerrit))\nEnceinte(cornelius) and Wonder(cornelius, grata) -> Bill(cornelius, kent)\nforall x (Bill(x, grata) and Bill(x, kent) -> Bill(x, gerrit))\nforall x (Rusted(x) and Centroidal(x) -> Enceinte(x))\n\nEnceinte(grata)\n\nWonder(grata, kent) and forall x (Wonder(x, kent) -> Centroidal(x)) -> therefore Centroidal(grata) Rusted(grata) and Centroidal(grata) and forall x (Rusted(x) and Centroidal(x) -> Enceinte(x)) -> therefore Enceinte(grata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The dannie putt the say. The dannie putt the lloyd. The dannie rejoin the say. The gussi is matching. The gussi marble the lloyd. The say is beggarly. The say rejoin the dannie. The say rejoin the gussi. The lloyd is uppermost. The lloyd marble the say. If something rejoin the gussi then it is paperback. If something is empathic then it is matching. If the lloyd marble the gussi then the lloyd rejoin the say. If something rejoin the gussi and the gussi putt the say then the gussi rejoin the say. If something marble the gussi then the gussi marble the dannie. If the lloyd is empathic and the lloyd rejoin the say then the lloyd marble the gussi. If something marble the say and it marble the gussi then it marble the dannie. All beggarly, paperback things are empathic. The say is not empathic.", "logic": "\nPutt(dannie, say)\nPutt(dannie, lloyd)\nRejoin(dannie, say)\nMatching(gussi)\nMarble(gussi, lloyd)\nBeggarly(say)\nRejoin(say, dannie)\nRejoin(say, gussi)\nUppermost(lloyd)\nMarble(lloyd, say)\nforall x (Rejoin(x, gussi) -> Paperback(x))\nforall x (Empathic(x) -> Matching(x))\nMarble(lloyd, gussi) -> Rejoin(lloyd, say)\nforall x (Rejoin(x, gussi) and Putt(gussi, say) -> Rejoin(gussi, say))\nforall x (Marble(x, gussi) -> Marble(gussi, dannie))\nEmpathic(lloyd) and Rejoin(lloyd, say) -> Marble(lloyd, gussi)\nforall x (Marble(x, say) and Marble(x, gussi) -> Marble(x, dannie))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) and Paperback(x) -> Empathic(x))\n\nnot Empathic(say)\n\nRejoin(say, gussi) and forall x (Rejoin(x, gussi) -> Paperback(x)) -> therefore Paperback(say) Beggarly(say) and Paperback(say) and forall x (Beggarly(x) and Paperback(x) -> Empathic(x)) -> therefore Empathic(say)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The teddi earn the nyssa. The teddi earn the javier. The teddi depolarize the nyssa. The keith is landed. The keith devoice the javier. The nyssa is protrusive. The nyssa depolarize the teddi. The nyssa depolarize the keith. The javier is effortless. The javier devoice the nyssa. If something depolarize the keith then it is daunted. If something is peaty then it is landed. If the javier devoice the keith then the javier depolarize the nyssa. If something depolarize the keith and the keith earn the nyssa then the keith depolarize the nyssa. If something devoice the keith then the keith devoice the teddi. If the javier is peaty and the javier depolarize the nyssa then the javier devoice the keith. If something devoice the nyssa and it devoice the keith then it devoice the teddi. All protrusive, daunted things are peaty. The nyssa is landed.", "logic": "\nEarn(teddi, nyssa)\nEarn(teddi, javier)\nDepolarize(teddi, nyssa)\nLanded(keith)\nDevoice(keith, javier)\nProtrusive(nyssa)\nDepolarize(nyssa, teddi)\nDepolarize(nyssa, keith)\nEffortless(javier)\nDevoice(javier, nyssa)\nforall x (Depolarize(x, keith) -> Daunted(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) -> Landed(x))\nDevoice(javier, keith) -> Depolarize(javier, nyssa)\nforall x (Depolarize(x, keith) and Earn(keith, nyssa) -> Depolarize(keith, nyssa))\nforall x (Devoice(x, keith) -> Devoice(keith, teddi))\nPeaty(javier) and Depolarize(javier, nyssa) -> Devoice(javier, keith)\nforall x (Devoice(x, nyssa) and Devoice(x, keith) -> Devoice(x, teddi))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) and Daunted(x) -> Peaty(x))\n\nLanded(nyssa)\n\nDepolarize(nyssa, keith) and forall x (Depolarize(x, keith) -> Daunted(x)) -> therefore Daunted(nyssa) Protrusive(nyssa) and Daunted(nyssa) and forall x (Protrusive(x) and Daunted(x) -> Peaty(x)) -> therefore Peaty(nyssa) Peaty(nyssa) and forall x (Peaty(x) -> Landed(x)) -> therefore Landed(nyssa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The thalia behove the vanda. The thalia behove the erwin. The thalia abut the vanda. The winton is pickled. The winton babble the erwin. The vanda is cephalopod. The vanda abut the thalia. The vanda abut the winton. The erwin is torrid. The erwin babble the vanda. If something abut the winton then it is strident. If something is backswept then it is pickled. If the erwin babble the winton then the erwin abut the vanda. If something abut the winton and the winton behove the vanda then the winton abut the vanda. If something babble the winton then the winton babble the thalia. If the erwin is backswept and the erwin abut the vanda then the erwin babble the winton. If something babble the vanda and it babble the winton then it babble the thalia. All cephalopod, strident things are backswept. The vanda is not pickled.", "logic": "\nBehove(thalia, vanda)\nBehove(thalia, erwin)\nAbut(thalia, vanda)\nPickled(winton)\nBabble(winton, erwin)\nCephalopod(vanda)\nAbut(vanda, thalia)\nAbut(vanda, winton)\nTorrid(erwin)\nBabble(erwin, vanda)\nforall x (Abut(x, winton) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) -> Pickled(x))\nBabble(erwin, winton) -> Abut(erwin, vanda)\nforall x (Abut(x, winton) and Behove(winton, vanda) -> Abut(winton, vanda))\nforall x (Babble(x, winton) -> Babble(winton, thalia))\nBackswept(erwin) and Abut(erwin, vanda) -> Babble(erwin, winton)\nforall x (Babble(x, vanda) and Babble(x, winton) -> Babble(x, thalia))\nforall x (Cephalopod(x) and Strident(x) -> Backswept(x))\n\nnot Pickled(vanda)\n\nAbut(vanda, winton) and forall x (Abut(x, winton) -> Strident(x)) -> therefore Strident(vanda) Cephalopod(vanda) and Strident(vanda) and forall x (Cephalopod(x) and Strident(x) -> Backswept(x)) -> therefore Backswept(vanda) Backswept(vanda) and forall x (Backswept(x) -> Pickled(x)) -> therefore Pickled(vanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The kylynn chop the gabrila. The kylynn chop the harriott. The kylynn prolong the gabrila. The ibrahim is cyrillic. The ibrahim placard the harriott. The gabrila is asterismal. The gabrila prolong the kylynn. The gabrila prolong the ibrahim. The harriott is velvet. The harriott placard the gabrila. If something prolong the ibrahim then it is metameric. If something is unsaleable then it is cyrillic. If the harriott placard the ibrahim then the harriott prolong the gabrila. If something prolong the ibrahim and the ibrahim chop the gabrila then the ibrahim prolong the gabrila. If something placard the ibrahim then the ibrahim placard the kylynn. If the harriott is unsaleable and the harriott prolong the gabrila then the harriott placard the ibrahim. If something placard the gabrila and it placard the ibrahim then it placard the kylynn. All asterismal, metameric things are unsaleable. The ibrahim does not visit the kylynn.", "logic": "\nChop(kylynn, gabrila)\nChop(kylynn, harriott)\nProlong(kylynn, gabrila)\nCyrillic(ibrahim)\nPlacard(ibrahim, harriott)\nAsterismal(gabrila)\nProlong(gabrila, kylynn)\nProlong(gabrila, ibrahim)\nVelvet(harriott)\nPlacard(harriott, gabrila)\nforall x (Prolong(x, ibrahim) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Cyrillic(x))\nPlacard(harriott, ibrahim) -> Prolong(harriott, gabrila)\nforall x (Prolong(x, ibrahim) and Chop(ibrahim, gabrila) -> Prolong(ibrahim, gabrila))\nforall x (Placard(x, ibrahim) -> Placard(ibrahim, kylynn))\nUnsaleable(harriott) and Prolong(harriott, gabrila) -> Placard(harriott, ibrahim)\nforall x (Placard(x, gabrila) and Placard(x, ibrahim) -> Placard(x, kylynn))\nforall x (Asterismal(x) and Metameric(x) -> Unsaleable(x))\n\nnot Placard(ibrahim, kylynn)\n\nforall x (Placard(x, ibrahim) -> Placard(ibrahim, kylynn)) <- Unsaleable(harriott) and Prolong(harriott, gabrila) -> Placard(harriott, ibrahim) <- forall x (Asterismal(x) and Metameric(x) -> Unsaleable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The jacinda monetise the aubrey. The jacinda monetise the ainslee. The jacinda batter the aubrey. The moise is mesial. The moise slide the ainslee. The aubrey is resolvable. The aubrey batter the jacinda. The aubrey batter the moise. The ainslee is candescent. The ainslee slide the aubrey. If something batter the moise then it is asteroidal. If something is goosy then it is mesial. If the ainslee slide the moise then the ainslee batter the aubrey. If something batter the moise and the moise monetise the aubrey then the moise batter the aubrey. If something slide the moise then the moise slide the jacinda. If the ainslee is goosy and the ainslee batter the aubrey then the ainslee slide the moise. If something slide the aubrey and it slide the moise then it slide the jacinda. All resolvable, asteroidal things are goosy. The moise is goosy.", "logic": "\nMonetise(jacinda, aubrey)\nMonetise(jacinda, ainslee)\nBatter(jacinda, aubrey)\nMesial(moise)\nSlide(moise, ainslee)\nResolvable(aubrey)\nBatter(aubrey, jacinda)\nBatter(aubrey, moise)\nCandescent(ainslee)\nSlide(ainslee, aubrey)\nforall x (Batter(x, moise) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Goosy(x) -> Mesial(x))\nSlide(ainslee, moise) -> Batter(ainslee, aubrey)\nforall x (Batter(x, moise) and Monetise(moise, aubrey) -> Batter(moise, aubrey))\nforall x (Slide(x, moise) -> Slide(moise, jacinda))\nGoosy(ainslee) and Batter(ainslee, aubrey) -> Slide(ainslee, moise)\nforall x (Slide(x, aubrey) and Slide(x, moise) -> Slide(x, jacinda))\nforall x (Resolvable(x) and Asteroidal(x) -> Goosy(x))\n\nGoosy(moise)\n\nforall x (Resolvable(x) and Asteroidal(x) -> Goosy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The kameko enfeeble the esma. The kameko enfeeble the wilden. The kameko tally the esma. The gonzales is schismatic. The gonzales introduce the wilden. The esma is spic. The esma tally the kameko. The esma tally the gonzales. The wilden is agrypnotic. The wilden introduce the esma. If something tally the gonzales then it is tanned. If something is epizootic then it is schismatic. If the wilden introduce the gonzales then the wilden tally the esma. If something tally the gonzales and the gonzales enfeeble the esma then the gonzales tally the esma. If something introduce the gonzales then the gonzales introduce the kameko. If the wilden is epizootic and the wilden tally the esma then the wilden introduce the gonzales. If something introduce the esma and it introduce the gonzales then it introduce the kameko. All spic, tanned things are epizootic. The esma does not visit the kameko.", "logic": "\nEnfeeble(kameko, esma)\nEnfeeble(kameko, wilden)\nTally(kameko, esma)\nSchismatic(gonzales)\nIntroduce(gonzales, wilden)\nSpic(esma)\nTally(esma, kameko)\nTally(esma, gonzales)\nAgrypnotic(wilden)\nIntroduce(wilden, esma)\nforall x (Tally(x, gonzales) -> Tanned(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Schismatic(x))\nIntroduce(wilden, gonzales) -> Tally(wilden, esma)\nforall x (Tally(x, gonzales) and Enfeeble(gonzales, esma) -> Tally(gonzales, esma))\nforall x (Introduce(x, gonzales) -> Introduce(gonzales, kameko))\nEpizootic(wilden) and Tally(wilden, esma) -> Introduce(wilden, gonzales)\nforall x (Introduce(x, esma) and Introduce(x, gonzales) -> Introduce(x, kameko))\nforall x (Spic(x) and Tanned(x) -> Epizootic(x))\n\nnot Introduce(esma, kameko)\n\nforall x (Introduce(x, esma) and Introduce(x, gonzales) -> Introduce(x, kameko)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The patric reclassify the orsa. The patric reclassify the jonathon. The patric snub the orsa. The keely is weathered. The keely tourney the jonathon. The orsa is stout. The orsa snub the patric. The orsa snub the keely. The jonathon is lymphoid. The jonathon tourney the orsa. If something snub the keely then it is straight. If something is boring then it is weathered. If the jonathon tourney the keely then the jonathon snub the orsa. If something snub the keely and the keely reclassify the orsa then the keely snub the orsa. If something tourney the keely then the keely tourney the patric. If the jonathon is boring and the jonathon snub the orsa then the jonathon tourney the keely. If something tourney the orsa and it tourney the keely then it tourney the patric. All stout, straight things are boring. The jonathon is straight.", "logic": "\nReclassify(patric, orsa)\nReclassify(patric, jonathon)\nSnub(patric, orsa)\nWeathered(keely)\nTourney(keely, jonathon)\nStout(orsa)\nSnub(orsa, patric)\nSnub(orsa, keely)\nLymphoid(jonathon)\nTourney(jonathon, orsa)\nforall x (Snub(x, keely) -> Straight(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Weathered(x))\nTourney(jonathon, keely) -> Snub(jonathon, orsa)\nforall x (Snub(x, keely) and Reclassify(keely, orsa) -> Snub(keely, orsa))\nforall x (Tourney(x, keely) -> Tourney(keely, patric))\nBoring(jonathon) and Snub(jonathon, orsa) -> Tourney(jonathon, keely)\nforall x (Tourney(x, orsa) and Tourney(x, keely) -> Tourney(x, patric))\nforall x (Stout(x) and Straight(x) -> Boring(x))\n\nStraight(jonathon)\n\nforall x (Snub(x, keely) -> Straight(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The chan vaccinate the rea. The chan vaccinate the angelle. The chan stool the rea. The leo is nutritive. The leo depreciate the angelle. The rea is dragging. The rea stool the chan. The rea stool the leo. The angelle is cogent. The angelle depreciate the rea. If something stool the leo then it is muted. If something is rhythmical then it is nutritive. If the angelle depreciate the leo then the angelle stool the rea. If something stool the leo and the leo vaccinate the rea then the leo stool the rea. If something depreciate the leo then the leo depreciate the chan. If the angelle is rhythmical and the angelle stool the rea then the angelle depreciate the leo. If something depreciate the rea and it depreciate the leo then it depreciate the chan. All dragging, muted things are rhythmical. The leo is not cogent.", "logic": "\nVaccinate(chan, rea)\nVaccinate(chan, angelle)\nStool(chan, rea)\nNutritive(leo)\nDepreciate(leo, angelle)\nDragging(rea)\nStool(rea, chan)\nStool(rea, leo)\nCogent(angelle)\nDepreciate(angelle, rea)\nforall x (Stool(x, leo) -> Muted(x))\nforall x (Rhythmical(x) -> Nutritive(x))\nDepreciate(angelle, leo) -> Stool(angelle, rea)\nforall x (Stool(x, leo) and Vaccinate(leo, rea) -> Stool(leo, rea))\nforall x (Depreciate(x, leo) -> Depreciate(leo, chan))\nRhythmical(angelle) and Stool(angelle, rea) -> Depreciate(angelle, leo)\nforall x (Depreciate(x, rea) and Depreciate(x, leo) -> Depreciate(x, chan))\nforall x (Dragging(x) and Muted(x) -> Rhythmical(x))\n\nnot Cogent(leo)\n\nnot Cogent(leo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The janie habituate the lucas. The janie habituate the tamma. The janie alcoholize the lucas. The margaux is peppy. The margaux malnourish the tamma. The lucas is fogged. The lucas alcoholize the janie. The lucas alcoholize the margaux. The tamma is masculine. The tamma malnourish the lucas. If something alcoholize the margaux then it is mormon. If something is cxxv then it is peppy. If the tamma malnourish the margaux then the tamma alcoholize the lucas. If something alcoholize the margaux and the margaux habituate the lucas then the margaux alcoholize the lucas. If something malnourish the margaux then the margaux malnourish the janie. If the tamma is cxxv and the tamma alcoholize the lucas then the tamma malnourish the margaux. If something malnourish the lucas and it malnourish the margaux then it malnourish the janie. All fogged, mormon things are cxxv. The tamma habituate the lucas.", "logic": "\nHabituate(janie, lucas)\nHabituate(janie, tamma)\nAlcoholize(janie, lucas)\nPeppy(margaux)\nMalnourish(margaux, tamma)\nFogged(lucas)\nAlcoholize(lucas, janie)\nAlcoholize(lucas, margaux)\nMasculine(tamma)\nMalnourish(tamma, lucas)\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, margaux) -> Mormon(x))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Peppy(x))\nMalnourish(tamma, margaux) -> Alcoholize(tamma, lucas)\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, margaux) and Habituate(margaux, lucas) -> Alcoholize(margaux, lucas))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, margaux) -> Malnourish(margaux, janie))\nCxxv(tamma) and Alcoholize(tamma, lucas) -> Malnourish(tamma, margaux)\nforall x (Malnourish(x, lucas) and Malnourish(x, margaux) -> Malnourish(x, janie))\nforall x (Fogged(x) and Mormon(x) -> Cxxv(x))\n\nHabituate(tamma, lucas)\n\nHabituate(tamma, lucas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The albert tail the donnajean. The albert tail the blaine. The albert screech the donnajean. The ahmet is fecund. The ahmet thrive the blaine. The donnajean is rustic. The donnajean screech the albert. The donnajean screech the ahmet. The blaine is meridian. The blaine thrive the donnajean. If something screech the ahmet then it is bronzy. If something is mature then it is fecund. If the blaine thrive the ahmet then the blaine screech the donnajean. If something screech the ahmet and the ahmet tail the donnajean then the ahmet screech the donnajean. If something thrive the ahmet then the ahmet thrive the albert. If the blaine is mature and the blaine screech the donnajean then the blaine thrive the ahmet. If something thrive the donnajean and it thrive the ahmet then it thrive the albert. All rustic, bronzy things are mature. The donnajean does not visit the ahmet.", "logic": "\nTail(albert, donnajean)\nTail(albert, blaine)\nScreech(albert, donnajean)\nFecund(ahmet)\nThrive(ahmet, blaine)\nRustic(donnajean)\nScreech(donnajean, albert)\nScreech(donnajean, ahmet)\nMeridian(blaine)\nThrive(blaine, donnajean)\nforall x (Screech(x, ahmet) -> Bronzy(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) -> Fecund(x))\nThrive(blaine, ahmet) -> Screech(blaine, donnajean)\nforall x (Screech(x, ahmet) and Tail(ahmet, donnajean) -> Screech(ahmet, donnajean))\nforall x (Thrive(x, ahmet) -> Thrive(ahmet, albert))\nMature(blaine) and Screech(blaine, donnajean) -> Thrive(blaine, ahmet)\nforall x (Thrive(x, donnajean) and Thrive(x, ahmet) -> Thrive(x, albert))\nforall x (Rustic(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Mature(x))\n\nnot Thrive(donnajean, ahmet)\n\nnot Thrive(donnajean, ahmet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The yevette ferment the gertruda. The yevette ferment the sylvan. The yevette tramp the gertruda. The wes is sluttish. The wes disapprove the sylvan. The gertruda is erroneous. The gertruda tramp the yevette. The gertruda tramp the wes. The sylvan is vaporish. The sylvan disapprove the gertruda. If something tramp the wes then it is glum. If something is phlegmatic then it is sluttish. If the sylvan disapprove the wes then the sylvan tramp the gertruda. If something tramp the wes and the wes ferment the gertruda then the wes tramp the gertruda. If something disapprove the wes then the wes disapprove the yevette. If the sylvan is phlegmatic and the sylvan tramp the gertruda then the sylvan disapprove the wes. If something disapprove the gertruda and it disapprove the wes then it disapprove the yevette. All erroneous, glum things are phlegmatic. The sylvan ferment the yevette.", "logic": "\nFerment(yevette, gertruda)\nFerment(yevette, sylvan)\nTramp(yevette, gertruda)\nSluttish(wes)\nDisapprove(wes, sylvan)\nErroneous(gertruda)\nTramp(gertruda, yevette)\nTramp(gertruda, wes)\nVaporish(sylvan)\nDisapprove(sylvan, gertruda)\nforall x (Tramp(x, wes) -> Glum(x))\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) -> Sluttish(x))\nDisapprove(sylvan, wes) -> Tramp(sylvan, gertruda)\nforall x (Tramp(x, wes) and Ferment(wes, gertruda) -> Tramp(wes, gertruda))\nforall x (Disapprove(x, wes) -> Disapprove(wes, yevette))\nPhlegmatic(sylvan) and Tramp(sylvan, gertruda) -> Disapprove(sylvan, wes)\nforall x (Disapprove(x, gertruda) and Disapprove(x, wes) -> Disapprove(x, yevette))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) and Glum(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\n\nFerment(sylvan, yevette)\n\nFerment(sylvan, yevette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "Hugo is parotid. Kesley is watertight. Geeta is watertight. All urgent things are not adaptable. All watertight, bleak things are adaptable. If Geeta is bleak and Geeta is parotid then Geeta is not watertight. All apopemptic things are urgent. Nice things are apopemptic. All bleak things are apopemptic. If Hugo is bleak then Hugo is not watertight. If something is watertight and parotid then it is bleak. Geeta is watertight.", "logic": "\nParotid(hugo)\nWatertight(kesley)\nWatertight(geeta)\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> not Adaptable(x))\nforall x (Watertight(x) and Bleak(x) -> Adaptable(x))\nBleak(geeta) and Parotid(geeta) -> not Watertight(geeta)\nforall x (Apopemptic(x) -> Urgent(x))\nforall x (Watertight(x) -> Apopemptic(x))\nforall x (Bleak(x) -> Apopemptic(x))\nBleak(hugo) -> not Watertight(hugo)\nforall x (Watertight(x) and Parotid(x) -> Bleak(x))\n\nWatertight(geeta)\n\ntherefore Watertight(geeta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Dulci is ectodermic. Aharon is isotropic. Rebeka is isotropic. All fearless things are not pauline. All isotropic, extralegal things are pauline. If Rebeka is extralegal and Rebeka is ectodermic then Rebeka is not isotropic. All popliteal things are fearless. Nice things are popliteal. All extralegal things are popliteal. If Dulci is extralegal then Dulci is not isotropic. If something is isotropic and ectodermic then it is extralegal. Dulci is not ectodermic.", "logic": "\nEctodermic(dulci)\nIsotropic(aharon)\nIsotropic(rebeka)\nforall x (Fearless(x) -> not Pauline(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Extralegal(x) -> Pauline(x))\nExtralegal(rebeka) and Ectodermic(rebeka) -> not Isotropic(rebeka)\nforall x (Popliteal(x) -> Fearless(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) -> Popliteal(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) -> Popliteal(x))\nExtralegal(dulci) -> not Isotropic(dulci)\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Ectodermic(x) -> Extralegal(x))\n\nnot Ectodermic(dulci)\n\ntherefore Ectodermic(dulci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Eudora is rustless. Gaspar is plaguy. Arleta is plaguy. All daunting things are not creamy. All plaguy, allogamous things are creamy. If Arleta is allogamous and Arleta is rustless then Arleta is not plaguy. All blotchy things are daunting. Nice things are blotchy. All allogamous things are blotchy. If Eudora is allogamous then Eudora is not plaguy. If something is plaguy and rustless then it is allogamous. Arleta is blotchy.", "logic": "\nRustless(eudora)\nPlaguy(gaspar)\nPlaguy(arleta)\nforall x (Daunting(x) -> not Creamy(x))\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and Allogamous(x) -> Creamy(x))\nAllogamous(arleta) and Rustless(arleta) -> not Plaguy(arleta)\nforall x (Blotchy(x) -> Daunting(x))\nforall x (Plaguy(x) -> Blotchy(x))\nforall x (Allogamous(x) -> Blotchy(x))\nAllogamous(eudora) -> not Plaguy(eudora)\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and Rustless(x) -> Allogamous(x))\n\nBlotchy(arleta)\n\nPlaguy(arleta) and forall x (Plaguy(x) -> Blotchy(x)) -> therefore Blotchy(arleta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Lev is agonising. Prasun is zoic. Davine is zoic. All radial things are not utilised. All zoic, raped things are utilised. If Davine is raped and Davine is agonising then Davine is not zoic. All nonwoody things are radial. Nice things are nonwoody. All raped things are nonwoody. If Lev is raped then Lev is not zoic. If something is zoic and agonising then it is raped. Prasun is not nonwoody.", "logic": "\nAgonising(lev)\nZoic(prasun)\nZoic(davine)\nforall x (Radial(x) -> not Utilised(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) and Raped(x) -> Utilised(x))\nRaped(davine) and Agonising(davine) -> not Zoic(davine)\nforall x (Nonwoody(x) -> Radial(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\nforall x (Raped(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\nRaped(lev) -> not Zoic(lev)\nforall x (Zoic(x) and Agonising(x) -> Raped(x))\n\nnot Nonwoody(prasun)\n\nZoic(prasun) and forall x (Zoic(x) -> Nonwoody(x)) -> therefore Nonwoody(prasun)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Desiree is factorial. Gunner is unhelpful. Charleton is unhelpful. All enumerable things are not omniscient. All unhelpful, irritating things are omniscient. If Charleton is irritating and Charleton is factorial then Charleton is not unhelpful. All scowling things are enumerable. Nice things are scowling. All irritating things are scowling. If Desiree is irritating then Desiree is not unhelpful. If something is unhelpful and factorial then it is irritating. Gunner is enumerable.", "logic": "\nFactorial(desiree)\nUnhelpful(gunner)\nUnhelpful(charleton)\nforall x (Enumerable(x) -> not Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Unhelpful(x) and Irritating(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nIrritating(charleton) and Factorial(charleton) -> not Unhelpful(charleton)\nforall x (Scowling(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Unhelpful(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Irritating(x) -> Scowling(x))\nIrritating(desiree) -> not Unhelpful(desiree)\nforall x (Unhelpful(x) and Factorial(x) -> Irritating(x))\n\nEnumerable(gunner)\n\nUnhelpful(gunner) and forall x (Unhelpful(x) -> Scowling(x)) -> therefore Scowling(gunner) Scowling(gunner) and forall x (Scowling(x) -> Enumerable(x)) -> therefore Enumerable(gunner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Felicia is ciliate. Greer is conductive. Isahella is conductive. All undecided things are not statant. All conductive, nonracial things are statant. If Isahella is nonracial and Isahella is ciliate then Isahella is not conductive. All brilliant things are undecided. Nice things are brilliant. All nonracial things are brilliant. If Felicia is nonracial then Felicia is not conductive. If something is conductive and ciliate then it is nonracial. Greer is not undecided.", "logic": "\nCiliate(felicia)\nConductive(greer)\nConductive(isahella)\nforall x (Undecided(x) -> not Statant(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Nonracial(x) -> Statant(x))\nNonracial(isahella) and Ciliate(isahella) -> not Conductive(isahella)\nforall x (Brilliant(x) -> Undecided(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) -> Brilliant(x))\nforall x (Nonracial(x) -> Brilliant(x))\nNonracial(felicia) -> not Conductive(felicia)\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Ciliate(x) -> Nonracial(x))\n\nnot Undecided(greer)\n\nConductive(greer) and forall x (Conductive(x) -> Brilliant(x)) -> therefore Brilliant(greer) Brilliant(greer) and forall x (Brilliant(x) -> Undecided(x)) -> therefore Undecided(greer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Idette is miserable. Thelma is uncovered. Kathrine is uncovered. All jolted things are not dependable. All uncovered, noxious things are dependable. If Kathrine is noxious and Kathrine is miserable then Kathrine is not uncovered. All colorful things are jolted. Nice things are colorful. All noxious things are colorful. If Idette is noxious then Idette is not uncovered. If something is uncovered and miserable then it is noxious. Thelma is not dependable.", "logic": "\nMiserable(idette)\nUncovered(thelma)\nUncovered(kathrine)\nforall x (Jolted(x) -> not Dependable(x))\nforall x (Uncovered(x) and Noxious(x) -> Dependable(x))\nNoxious(kathrine) and Miserable(kathrine) -> not Uncovered(kathrine)\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Jolted(x))\nforall x (Uncovered(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Colorful(x))\nNoxious(idette) -> not Uncovered(idette)\nforall x (Uncovered(x) and Miserable(x) -> Noxious(x))\n\nnot Dependable(thelma)\n\nUncovered(thelma) and forall x (Uncovered(x) -> Colorful(x)) -> therefore Colorful(thelma) Colorful(thelma) and forall x (Colorful(x) -> Jolted(x)) -> therefore Jolted(thelma) Jolted(thelma) and forall x (Jolted(x) -> not Dependable(x)) -> therefore not Dependable(thelma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Jessie is leglike. Annemarie is nicaean. Lucia is nicaean. All touchy things are not pocked. All nicaean, brindle things are pocked. If Lucia is brindle and Lucia is leglike then Lucia is not nicaean. All fuddled things are touchy. Nice things are fuddled. All brindle things are fuddled. If Jessie is brindle then Jessie is not nicaean. If something is nicaean and leglike then it is brindle. Annemarie is pocked.", "logic": "\nLeglike(jessie)\nNicaean(annemarie)\nNicaean(lucia)\nforall x (Touchy(x) -> not Pocked(x))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) and Brindle(x) -> Pocked(x))\nBrindle(lucia) and Leglike(lucia) -> not Nicaean(lucia)\nforall x (Fuddled(x) -> Touchy(x))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) -> Fuddled(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Fuddled(x))\nBrindle(jessie) -> not Nicaean(jessie)\nforall x (Nicaean(x) and Leglike(x) -> Brindle(x))\n\nPocked(annemarie)\n\nNicaean(annemarie) and forall x (Nicaean(x) -> Fuddled(x)) -> therefore Fuddled(annemarie) Fuddled(annemarie) and forall x (Fuddled(x) -> Touchy(x)) -> therefore Touchy(annemarie) Touchy(annemarie) and forall x (Touchy(x) -> not Pocked(x)) -> therefore not Pocked(annemarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Cele is metabolic. Merilyn is undeniable. Arlette is undeniable. All gabonese things are not upraised. All undeniable, northwest things are upraised. If Arlette is northwest and Arlette is metabolic then Arlette is not undeniable. All unkept things are gabonese. Nice things are unkept. All northwest things are unkept. If Cele is northwest then Cele is not undeniable. If something is undeniable and metabolic then it is northwest. Cele is not unkept.", "logic": "\nMetabolic(cele)\nUndeniable(merilyn)\nUndeniable(arlette)\nforall x (Gabonese(x) -> not Upraised(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) and Northwest(x) -> Upraised(x))\nNorthwest(arlette) and Metabolic(arlette) -> not Undeniable(arlette)\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Gabonese(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Northwest(x) -> Unkept(x))\nNorthwest(cele) -> not Undeniable(cele)\nforall x (Undeniable(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Northwest(x))\n\nnot Unkept(cele)\n\nforall x (Northwest(x) -> Unkept(x)) <- forall x (Undeniable(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Northwest(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Rheba is isentropic. Alta is beltless. Leola is beltless. All extravert things are not pumped. All beltless, yeasty things are pumped. If Leola is yeasty and Leola is isentropic then Leola is not beltless. All trig things are extravert. Nice things are trig. All yeasty things are trig. If Rheba is yeasty then Rheba is not beltless. If something is beltless and isentropic then it is yeasty. Alta is yeasty.", "logic": "\nIsentropic(rheba)\nBeltless(alta)\nBeltless(leola)\nforall x (Extravert(x) -> not Pumped(x))\nforall x (Beltless(x) and Yeasty(x) -> Pumped(x))\nYeasty(leola) and Isentropic(leola) -> not Beltless(leola)\nforall x (Trig(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Trig(x))\nYeasty(rheba) -> not Beltless(rheba)\nforall x (Beltless(x) and Isentropic(x) -> Yeasty(x))\n\nYeasty(alta)\n\nforall x (Beltless(x) and Isentropic(x) -> Yeasty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Carola is endogamic. Bellanca is jocular. Carlton is jocular. All crescent things are not rotated. All jocular, matching things are rotated. If Carlton is matching and Carlton is endogamic then Carlton is not jocular. All eccentric things are crescent. Nice things are eccentric. All matching things are eccentric. If Carola is matching then Carola is not jocular. If something is jocular and endogamic then it is matching. Carola is not rotated.", "logic": "\nEndogamic(carola)\nJocular(bellanca)\nJocular(carlton)\nforall x (Crescent(x) -> not Rotated(x))\nforall x (Jocular(x) and Matching(x) -> Rotated(x))\nMatching(carlton) and Endogamic(carlton) -> not Jocular(carlton)\nforall x (Eccentric(x) -> Crescent(x))\nforall x (Jocular(x) -> Eccentric(x))\nforall x (Matching(x) -> Eccentric(x))\nMatching(carola) -> not Jocular(carola)\nforall x (Jocular(x) and Endogamic(x) -> Matching(x))\n\nnot Rotated(carola)\n\nforall x (Jocular(x) and Matching(x) -> Rotated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Xymenes is drifting. Gordon is nonstop. Lorrayne is nonstop. All talky things are not cortical. All nonstop, coincident things are cortical. If Lorrayne is coincident and Lorrayne is drifting then Lorrayne is not nonstop. All bimestrial things are talky. Nice things are bimestrial. All coincident things are bimestrial. If Xymenes is coincident then Xymenes is not nonstop. If something is nonstop and drifting then it is coincident. Xymenes is talky.", "logic": "\nDrifting(xymenes)\nNonstop(gordon)\nNonstop(lorrayne)\nforall x (Talky(x) -> not Cortical(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and Coincident(x) -> Cortical(x))\nCoincident(lorrayne) and Drifting(lorrayne) -> not Nonstop(lorrayne)\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) -> Bimestrial(x))\nforall x (Coincident(x) -> Bimestrial(x))\nCoincident(xymenes) -> not Nonstop(xymenes)\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and Drifting(x) -> Coincident(x))\n\nTalky(xymenes)\n\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Talky(x)) <- forall x (Coincident(x) -> Bimestrial(x)) <- forall x (Nonstop(x) and Drifting(x) -> Coincident(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Sherrie is particular. Cornie is meteoritic. Dorothy is meteoritic. All semiliquid things are not petaloid. All meteoritic, promising things are petaloid. If Dorothy is promising and Dorothy is particular then Dorothy is not meteoritic. All immaculate things are semiliquid. Nice things are immaculate. All promising things are immaculate. If Sherrie is promising then Sherrie is not meteoritic. If something is meteoritic and particular then it is promising. Cornie is not particular.", "logic": "\nParticular(sherrie)\nMeteoritic(cornie)\nMeteoritic(dorothy)\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> not Petaloid(x))\nforall x (Meteoritic(x) and Promising(x) -> Petaloid(x))\nPromising(dorothy) and Particular(dorothy) -> not Meteoritic(dorothy)\nforall x (Immaculate(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\nforall x (Meteoritic(x) -> Immaculate(x))\nforall x (Promising(x) -> Immaculate(x))\nPromising(sherrie) -> not Meteoritic(sherrie)\nforall x (Meteoritic(x) and Particular(x) -> Promising(x))\n\nnot Particular(cornie)\n\nnot Particular(cornie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Skip is jolly. Cherie is divorced. Lenka is divorced. All respectful things are not toneless. All divorced, spendable things are toneless. If Lenka is spendable and Lenka is jolly then Lenka is not divorced. All taiwanese things are respectful. Nice things are taiwanese. All spendable things are taiwanese. If Skip is spendable then Skip is not divorced. If something is divorced and jolly then it is spendable. Cherie is smart.", "logic": "\nJolly(skip)\nDivorced(cherie)\nDivorced(lenka)\nforall x (Respectful(x) -> not Toneless(x))\nforall x (Divorced(x) and Spendable(x) -> Toneless(x))\nSpendable(lenka) and Jolly(lenka) -> not Divorced(lenka)\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) -> Respectful(x))\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nSpendable(skip) -> not Divorced(skip)\nforall x (Divorced(x) and Jolly(x) -> Spendable(x))\n\nSmart(cherie)\n\nSmart(cherie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Waylin is jawless. Blinni is alular. Aliza is alular. All bratty things are not erogenous. All alular, undeserved things are erogenous. If Aliza is undeserved and Aliza is jawless then Aliza is not alular. All euclidean things are bratty. Nice things are euclidean. All undeserved things are euclidean. If Waylin is undeserved then Waylin is not alular. If something is alular and jawless then it is undeserved. Waylin is not smart.", "logic": "\nJawless(waylin)\nAlular(blinni)\nAlular(aliza)\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> not Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Alular(x) and Undeserved(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nUndeserved(aliza) and Jawless(aliza) -> not Alular(aliza)\nforall x (Euclidean(x) -> Bratty(x))\nforall x (Alular(x) -> Euclidean(x))\nforall x (Undeserved(x) -> Euclidean(x))\nUndeserved(waylin) -> not Alular(waylin)\nforall x (Alular(x) and Jawless(x) -> Undeserved(x))\n\nnot Smart(waylin)\n\nnot Smart(waylin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Heywood is wakeful. Trey is ascitic. Thom is ascitic. All tangible things are not basic. All ascitic, taunting things are basic. If Thom is taunting and Thom is wakeful then Thom is not ascitic. All excursive things are tangible. Nice things are excursive. All taunting things are excursive. If Heywood is taunting then Heywood is not ascitic. If something is ascitic and wakeful then it is taunting. Thom is wakeful.", "logic": "\nWakeful(heywood)\nAscitic(trey)\nAscitic(thom)\nforall x (Tangible(x) -> not Basic(x))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) and Taunting(x) -> Basic(x))\nTaunting(thom) and Wakeful(thom) -> not Ascitic(thom)\nforall x (Excursive(x) -> Tangible(x))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> Excursive(x))\nforall x (Taunting(x) -> Excursive(x))\nTaunting(heywood) -> not Ascitic(heywood)\nforall x (Ascitic(x) and Wakeful(x) -> Taunting(x))\n\nWakeful(thom)\n\nWakeful(thom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "The sophey mismate the mariette. The mariette is drippy. If something mismate the mariette and the mariette is unionised then the mariette is angular. If the mariette dislike the sophey then the mariette is yellowed. If something mismate the sophey then it dislike the sophey. If something is unionised and unshaded then it decipher the sophey. If something is drippy then it mismate the sophey. If something dislike the mariette and the mariette is yellowed then it mismate the mariette. The mariette is drippy.", "logic": "\nMismate(sophey, mariette)\nDrippy(mariette)\nforall x (Mismate(x, mariette) and Unionised(mariette) -> Angular(mariette))\nDislike(mariette, sophey) -> Yellowed(mariette)\nforall x (Mismate(x, sophey) -> Dislike(x, sophey))\nforall x (Unionised(x) and Unshaded(x) -> Decipher(x, sophey))\nforall x (Drippy(x) -> Mismate(x, sophey))\nforall x (Dislike(x, mariette) and Yellowed(mariette) -> Mismate(x, mariette))\n\nDrippy(mariette)\n\ntherefore Drippy(mariette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The darsie consummate the hersch. The hersch is organismic. If something consummate the hersch and the hersch is testaceous then the hersch is collinear. If the hersch lurk the darsie then the hersch is naming. If something consummate the darsie then it lurk the darsie. If something is testaceous and navigable then it afforest the darsie. If something is organismic then it consummate the darsie. If something lurk the hersch and the hersch is naming then it consummate the hersch. The hersch is not organismic.", "logic": "\nConsummate(darsie, hersch)\nOrganismic(hersch)\nforall x (Consummate(x, hersch) and Testaceous(hersch) -> Collinear(hersch))\nLurk(hersch, darsie) -> Naming(hersch)\nforall x (Consummate(x, darsie) -> Lurk(x, darsie))\nforall x (Testaceous(x) and Navigable(x) -> Afforest(x, darsie))\nforall x (Organismic(x) -> Consummate(x, darsie))\nforall x (Lurk(x, hersch) and Naming(hersch) -> Consummate(x, hersch))\n\nnot Organismic(hersch)\n\ntherefore Organismic(hersch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The donnajean liquefy the juli. The juli is underhung. If something liquefy the juli and the juli is indignant then the juli is scholarly. If the juli dawdle the donnajean then the juli is adsorptive. If something liquefy the donnajean then it dawdle the donnajean. If something is indignant and fleet then it refloat the donnajean. If something is underhung then it liquefy the donnajean. If something dawdle the juli and the juli is adsorptive then it liquefy the juli. The juli liquefy the donnajean.", "logic": "\nLiquefy(donnajean, juli)\nUnderhung(juli)\nforall x (Liquefy(x, juli) and Indignant(juli) -> Scholarly(juli))\nDawdle(juli, donnajean) -> Adsorptive(juli)\nforall x (Liquefy(x, donnajean) -> Dawdle(x, donnajean))\nforall x (Indignant(x) and Fleet(x) -> Refloat(x, donnajean))\nforall x (Underhung(x) -> Liquefy(x, donnajean))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, juli) and Adsorptive(juli) -> Liquefy(x, juli))\n\nLiquefy(juli, donnajean)\n\nUnderhung(juli) and forall x (Underhung(x) -> Liquefy(x, donnajean)) -> therefore Liquefy(juli, donnajean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The estelle picnic the mala. The mala is bifacial. If something picnic the mala and the mala is neapolitan then the mala is deltoid. If the mala falcon the estelle then the mala is brunet. If something picnic the estelle then it falcon the estelle. If something is neapolitan and bowing then it caravan the estelle. If something is bifacial then it picnic the estelle. If something falcon the mala and the mala is brunet then it picnic the mala. The mala does not eat the estelle.", "logic": "\nPicnic(estelle, mala)\nBifacial(mala)\nforall x (Picnic(x, mala) and Neapolitan(mala) -> Deltoid(mala))\nFalcon(mala, estelle) -> Brunet(mala)\nforall x (Picnic(x, estelle) -> Falcon(x, estelle))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) and Bowing(x) -> Caravan(x, estelle))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Picnic(x, estelle))\nforall x (Falcon(x, mala) and Brunet(mala) -> Picnic(x, mala))\n\nnot Picnic(mala, estelle)\n\nBifacial(mala) and forall x (Bifacial(x) -> Picnic(x, estelle)) -> therefore Picnic(mala, estelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The torrence blabber the roseann. The roseann is nonplused. If something blabber the roseann and the roseann is clxxv then the roseann is liberated. If the roseann nitrate the torrence then the roseann is tentative. If something blabber the torrence then it nitrate the torrence. If something is clxxv and releasing then it brazen the torrence. If something is nonplused then it blabber the torrence. If something nitrate the roseann and the roseann is tentative then it blabber the roseann. The roseann nitrate the torrence.", "logic": "\nBlabber(torrence, roseann)\nNonplused(roseann)\nforall x (Blabber(x, roseann) and Clxxv(roseann) -> Liberated(roseann))\nNitrate(roseann, torrence) -> Tentative(roseann)\nforall x (Blabber(x, torrence) -> Nitrate(x, torrence))\nforall x (Clxxv(x) and Releasing(x) -> Brazen(x, torrence))\nforall x (Nonplused(x) -> Blabber(x, torrence))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, roseann) and Tentative(roseann) -> Blabber(x, roseann))\n\nNitrate(roseann, torrence)\n\nNonplused(roseann) and forall x (Nonplused(x) -> Blabber(x, torrence)) -> therefore Blabber(roseann, torrence) Blabber(roseann, torrence) and forall x (Blabber(x, torrence) -> Nitrate(x, torrence)) -> therefore Nitrate(roseann, torrence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The hamel divulge the hershel. The hershel is vulpine. If something divulge the hershel and the hershel is unrigged then the hershel is theist. If the hershel woolgather the hamel then the hershel is colonised. If something divulge the hamel then it woolgather the hamel. If something is unrigged and sightly then it boggle the hamel. If something is vulpine then it divulge the hamel. If something woolgather the hershel and the hershel is colonised then it divulge the hershel. The hershel does not need the hamel.", "logic": "\nDivulge(hamel, hershel)\nVulpine(hershel)\nforall x (Divulge(x, hershel) and Unrigged(hershel) -> Theist(hershel))\nWoolgather(hershel, hamel) -> Colonised(hershel)\nforall x (Divulge(x, hamel) -> Woolgather(x, hamel))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) and Sightly(x) -> Boggle(x, hamel))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) -> Divulge(x, hamel))\nforall x (Woolgather(x, hershel) and Colonised(hershel) -> Divulge(x, hershel))\n\nnot Woolgather(hershel, hamel)\n\nVulpine(hershel) and forall x (Vulpine(x) -> Divulge(x, hamel)) -> therefore Divulge(hershel, hamel) Divulge(hershel, hamel) and forall x (Divulge(x, hamel) -> Woolgather(x, hamel)) -> therefore Woolgather(hershel, hamel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The elmore bream the jori. The jori is strict. If something bream the jori and the jori is busy then the jori is adventive. If the jori hollow the elmore then the jori is alkalic. If something bream the elmore then it hollow the elmore. If something is busy and lipped then it tuck the elmore. If something is strict then it bream the elmore. If something hollow the jori and the jori is alkalic then it bream the jori. The jori is alkalic.", "logic": "\nBream(elmore, jori)\nStrict(jori)\nforall x (Bream(x, jori) and Busy(jori) -> Adventive(jori))\nHollow(jori, elmore) -> Alkalic(jori)\nforall x (Bream(x, elmore) -> Hollow(x, elmore))\nforall x (Busy(x) and Lipped(x) -> Tuck(x, elmore))\nforall x (Strict(x) -> Bream(x, elmore))\nforall x (Hollow(x, jori) and Alkalic(jori) -> Bream(x, jori))\n\nAlkalic(jori)\n\nStrict(jori) and forall x (Strict(x) -> Bream(x, elmore)) -> therefore Bream(jori, elmore) Bream(jori, elmore) and forall x (Bream(x, elmore) -> Hollow(x, elmore)) -> therefore Hollow(jori, elmore) Hollow(jori, elmore) and Hollow(jori, elmore) -> Alkalic(jori) -> therefore Alkalic(jori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The rae twist the adolphus. The adolphus is defiled. If something twist the adolphus and the adolphus is tellurian then the adolphus is palmar. If the adolphus rhyme the rae then the adolphus is congruent. If something twist the rae then it rhyme the rae. If something is tellurian and reliant then it gruntle the rae. If something is defiled then it twist the rae. If something rhyme the adolphus and the adolphus is congruent then it twist the adolphus. The adolphus is not congruent.", "logic": "\nTwist(rae, adolphus)\nDefiled(adolphus)\nforall x (Twist(x, adolphus) and Tellurian(adolphus) -> Palmar(adolphus))\nRhyme(adolphus, rae) -> Congruent(adolphus)\nforall x (Twist(x, rae) -> Rhyme(x, rae))\nforall x (Tellurian(x) and Reliant(x) -> Gruntle(x, rae))\nforall x (Defiled(x) -> Twist(x, rae))\nforall x (Rhyme(x, adolphus) and Congruent(adolphus) -> Twist(x, adolphus))\n\nnot Congruent(adolphus)\n\nDefiled(adolphus) and forall x (Defiled(x) -> Twist(x, rae)) -> therefore Twist(adolphus, rae) Twist(adolphus, rae) and forall x (Twist(x, rae) -> Rhyme(x, rae)) -> therefore Rhyme(adolphus, rae) Rhyme(adolphus, rae) and Rhyme(adolphus, rae) -> Congruent(adolphus) -> therefore Congruent(adolphus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The jessey edit the jeanelle. The jeanelle is based. If something edit the jeanelle and the jeanelle is latish then the jeanelle is several. If the jeanelle carom the jessey then the jeanelle is gooey. If something edit the jessey then it carom the jessey. If something is latish and lxxii then it queue the jessey. If something is based then it edit the jessey. If something carom the jeanelle and the jeanelle is gooey then it edit the jeanelle. The jeanelle does not chase the jessey.", "logic": "\nEdit(jessey, jeanelle)\nBased(jeanelle)\nforall x (Edit(x, jeanelle) and Latish(jeanelle) -> Several(jeanelle))\nCarom(jeanelle, jessey) -> Gooey(jeanelle)\nforall x (Edit(x, jessey) -> Carom(x, jessey))\nforall x (Latish(x) and Lxxii(x) -> Queue(x, jessey))\nforall x (Based(x) -> Edit(x, jessey))\nforall x (Carom(x, jeanelle) and Gooey(jeanelle) -> Edit(x, jeanelle))\n\nnot Queue(jeanelle, jessey)\n\nforall x (Latish(x) and Lxxii(x) -> Queue(x, jessey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The liora expose the hamlen. The hamlen is leafed. If something expose the hamlen and the hamlen is swift then the hamlen is mirky. If the hamlen rigidify the liora then the hamlen is steady. If something expose the liora then it rigidify the liora. If something is swift and urceolate then it coordinate the liora. If something is leafed then it expose the liora. If something rigidify the hamlen and the hamlen is steady then it expose the hamlen. The liora expose the liora.", "logic": "\nExpose(liora, hamlen)\nLeafed(hamlen)\nforall x (Expose(x, hamlen) and Swift(hamlen) -> Mirky(hamlen))\nRigidify(hamlen, liora) -> Steady(hamlen)\nforall x (Expose(x, liora) -> Rigidify(x, liora))\nforall x (Swift(x) and Urceolate(x) -> Coordinate(x, liora))\nforall x (Leafed(x) -> Expose(x, liora))\nforall x (Rigidify(x, hamlen) and Steady(hamlen) -> Expose(x, hamlen))\n\nExpose(liora, liora)\n\nforall x (Leafed(x) -> Expose(x, liora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The canada print the leandra. The leandra is junior. If something print the leandra and the leandra is lifeless then the leandra is perceived. If the leandra uncouple the canada then the leandra is evidential. If something print the canada then it uncouple the canada. If something is lifeless and errorless then it recurve the canada. If something is junior then it print the canada. If something uncouple the leandra and the leandra is evidential then it print the leandra. The leandra is not perceived.", "logic": "\nPrint(canada, leandra)\nJunior(leandra)\nforall x (Print(x, leandra) and Lifeless(leandra) -> Perceived(leandra))\nUncouple(leandra, canada) -> Evidential(leandra)\nforall x (Print(x, canada) -> Uncouple(x, canada))\nforall x (Lifeless(x) and Errorless(x) -> Recurve(x, canada))\nforall x (Junior(x) -> Print(x, canada))\nforall x (Uncouple(x, leandra) and Evidential(leandra) -> Print(x, leandra))\n\nnot Perceived(leandra)\n\nforall x (Print(x, leandra) and Lifeless(leandra) -> Perceived(leandra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The ellen prorate the stacia. The stacia is unlisted. If something prorate the stacia and the stacia is alimental then the stacia is foreign. If the stacia brighten the ellen then the stacia is unabashed. If something prorate the ellen then it brighten the ellen. If something is alimental and epenthetic then it whale the ellen. If something is unlisted then it prorate the ellen. If something brighten the stacia and the stacia is unabashed then it prorate the stacia. The ellen whale the ellen.", "logic": "\nProrate(ellen, stacia)\nUnlisted(stacia)\nforall x (Prorate(x, stacia) and Alimental(stacia) -> Foreign(stacia))\nBrighten(stacia, ellen) -> Unabashed(stacia)\nforall x (Prorate(x, ellen) -> Brighten(x, ellen))\nforall x (Alimental(x) and Epenthetic(x) -> Whale(x, ellen))\nforall x (Unlisted(x) -> Prorate(x, ellen))\nforall x (Brighten(x, stacia) and Unabashed(stacia) -> Prorate(x, stacia))\n\nWhale(ellen, ellen)\n\nforall x (Alimental(x) and Epenthetic(x) -> Whale(x, ellen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The rodi cave the bernelle. The bernelle is cynical. If something cave the bernelle and the bernelle is penumbral then the bernelle is unreported. If the bernelle concede the rodi then the bernelle is doubtful. If something cave the rodi then it concede the rodi. If something is penumbral and sexy then it necrose the rodi. If something is cynical then it cave the rodi. If something concede the bernelle and the bernelle is doubtful then it cave the bernelle. The bernelle does not need the bernelle.", "logic": "\nCave(rodi, bernelle)\nCynical(bernelle)\nforall x (Cave(x, bernelle) and Penumbral(bernelle) -> Unreported(bernelle))\nConcede(bernelle, rodi) -> Doubtful(bernelle)\nforall x (Cave(x, rodi) -> Concede(x, rodi))\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and Sexy(x) -> Necrose(x, rodi))\nforall x (Cynical(x) -> Cave(x, rodi))\nforall x (Concede(x, bernelle) and Doubtful(bernelle) -> Cave(x, bernelle))\n\nnot Concede(bernelle, bernelle)\n\nnot Concede(bernelle, bernelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The rosalia blog the lois. The lois is infatuated. If something blog the lois and the lois is scorching then the lois is numerous. If the lois wander the rosalia then the lois is viricidal. If something blog the rosalia then it wander the rosalia. If something is scorching and unmated then it indue the rosalia. If something is infatuated then it blog the rosalia. If something wander the lois and the lois is viricidal then it blog the lois. The lois is scorching.", "logic": "\nBlog(rosalia, lois)\nInfatuated(lois)\nforall x (Blog(x, lois) and Scorching(lois) -> Numerous(lois))\nWander(lois, rosalia) -> Viricidal(lois)\nforall x (Blog(x, rosalia) -> Wander(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Scorching(x) and Unmated(x) -> Indue(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Infatuated(x) -> Blog(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Wander(x, lois) and Viricidal(lois) -> Blog(x, lois))\n\nScorching(lois)\n\nScorching(lois) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The delila franchise the elvira. The elvira is world. If something franchise the elvira and the elvira is clubbish then the elvira is dusty. If the elvira moult the delila then the elvira is ringed. If something franchise the delila then it moult the delila. If something is clubbish and limbless then it slink the delila. If something is world then it franchise the delila. If something moult the elvira and the elvira is ringed then it franchise the elvira. The delila is not dusty.", "logic": "\nFranchise(delila, elvira)\nWorld(elvira)\nforall x (Franchise(x, elvira) and Clubbish(elvira) -> Dusty(elvira))\nMoult(elvira, delila) -> Ringed(elvira)\nforall x (Franchise(x, delila) -> Moult(x, delila))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) and Limbless(x) -> Slink(x, delila))\nforall x (World(x) -> Franchise(x, delila))\nforall x (Moult(x, elvira) and Ringed(elvira) -> Franchise(x, elvira))\n\nnot Dusty(delila)\n\nnot Dusty(delila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The jania admire the averyl. The averyl is polymeric. If something admire the averyl and the averyl is conversant then the averyl is sedgelike. If the averyl sequence the jania then the averyl is subnormal. If something admire the jania then it sequence the jania. If something is conversant and vengeful then it truncate the jania. If something is polymeric then it admire the jania. If something sequence the averyl and the averyl is subnormal then it admire the averyl. The jania sequence the averyl.", "logic": "\nAdmire(jania, averyl)\nPolymeric(averyl)\nforall x (Admire(x, averyl) and Conversant(averyl) -> Sedgelike(averyl))\nSequence(averyl, jania) -> Subnormal(averyl)\nforall x (Admire(x, jania) -> Sequence(x, jania))\nforall x (Conversant(x) and Vengeful(x) -> Truncate(x, jania))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) -> Admire(x, jania))\nforall x (Sequence(x, averyl) and Subnormal(averyl) -> Admire(x, averyl))\n\nSequence(jania, averyl)\n\nSequence(jania, averyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The waverly perform the nickie. The waverly is antiseptic. The waverly is not prodigal. The waverly soup the xylina. The waverly soup the nickie. The waverly joint the xylina. The waverly joint the nickie. The xylina perform the waverly. The xylina perform the nickie. The xylina is huffish. The nickie perform the xylina. The nickie is huffish. The nickie is not percussive. The nickie soup the waverly. The nickie does not like the xylina. The nickie does not see the waverly. If the nickie perform the waverly then the nickie joint the xylina. If the xylina perform the waverly then the waverly is antiseptic. If something is prodigal then it joint the nickie. If the waverly perform the nickie then the nickie is not percussive. If something joint the nickie then it is haemic. If something soup the xylina then the xylina is prodigal. If something soup the waverly then it is not prodigal. If the waverly joint the xylina then the waverly joint the nickie. The nickie soup the waverly.", "logic": "\nPerform(waverly, nickie)\nAntiseptic(waverly)\nnot Prodigal(waverly)\nSoup(waverly, xylina)\nSoup(waverly, nickie)\nJoint(waverly, xylina)\nJoint(waverly, nickie)\nPerform(xylina, waverly)\nPerform(xylina, nickie)\nHuffish(xylina)\nPerform(nickie, xylina)\nHuffish(nickie)\nnot Percussive(nickie)\nSoup(nickie, waverly)\nnot Soup(nickie, xylina)\nnot Joint(nickie, waverly)\nPerform(nickie, waverly) -> Joint(nickie, xylina)\nPerform(xylina, waverly) -> Antiseptic(waverly)\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Joint(x, nickie))\nPerform(waverly, nickie) -> not Percussive(nickie)\nforall x (Joint(x, nickie) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Soup(x, xylina) -> Prodigal(xylina))\nforall x (Soup(x, waverly) -> not Prodigal(x))\nJoint(waverly, xylina) -> Joint(waverly, nickie)\n\nSoup(nickie, waverly)\n\ntherefore Soup(nickie, waverly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The addie mistime the kandy. The addie is lively. The addie is not final. The addie maltreat the oswald. The addie maltreat the kandy. The addie coldwork the oswald. The addie coldwork the kandy. The oswald mistime the addie. The oswald mistime the kandy. The oswald is timely. The kandy mistime the oswald. The kandy is timely. The kandy is not excursive. The kandy maltreat the addie. The kandy does not like the oswald. The kandy does not see the addie. If the kandy mistime the addie then the kandy coldwork the oswald. If the oswald mistime the addie then the addie is lively. If something is final then it coldwork the kandy. If the addie mistime the kandy then the kandy is not excursive. If something coldwork the kandy then it is modular. If something maltreat the oswald then the oswald is final. If something maltreat the addie then it is not final. If the addie coldwork the oswald then the addie coldwork the kandy. The addie is final.", "logic": "\nMistime(addie, kandy)\nLively(addie)\nnot Final(addie)\nMaltreat(addie, oswald)\nMaltreat(addie, kandy)\nColdwork(addie, oswald)\nColdwork(addie, kandy)\nMistime(oswald, addie)\nMistime(oswald, kandy)\nTimely(oswald)\nMistime(kandy, oswald)\nTimely(kandy)\nnot Excursive(kandy)\nMaltreat(kandy, addie)\nnot Maltreat(kandy, oswald)\nnot Coldwork(kandy, addie)\nMistime(kandy, addie) -> Coldwork(kandy, oswald)\nMistime(oswald, addie) -> Lively(addie)\nforall x (Final(x) -> Coldwork(x, kandy))\nMistime(addie, kandy) -> not Excursive(kandy)\nforall x (Coldwork(x, kandy) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, oswald) -> Final(oswald))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, addie) -> not Final(x))\nColdwork(addie, oswald) -> Coldwork(addie, kandy)\n\nFinal(addie)\n\ntherefore not Final(addie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The gunilla undersign the clarke. The gunilla is galore. The gunilla is not auriculate. The gunilla convolute the ruthie. The gunilla convolute the clarke. The gunilla jactitate the ruthie. The gunilla jactitate the clarke. The ruthie undersign the gunilla. The ruthie undersign the clarke. The ruthie is malposed. The clarke undersign the ruthie. The clarke is malposed. The clarke is not cadaverous. The clarke convolute the gunilla. The clarke does not like the ruthie. The clarke does not see the gunilla. If the clarke undersign the gunilla then the clarke jactitate the ruthie. If the ruthie undersign the gunilla then the gunilla is galore. If something is auriculate then it jactitate the clarke. If the gunilla undersign the clarke then the clarke is not cadaverous. If something jactitate the clarke then it is ignored. If something convolute the ruthie then the ruthie is auriculate. If something convolute the gunilla then it is not auriculate. If the gunilla jactitate the ruthie then the gunilla jactitate the clarke. The clarke is not auriculate.", "logic": "\nUndersign(gunilla, clarke)\nGalore(gunilla)\nnot Auriculate(gunilla)\nConvolute(gunilla, ruthie)\nConvolute(gunilla, clarke)\nJactitate(gunilla, ruthie)\nJactitate(gunilla, clarke)\nUndersign(ruthie, gunilla)\nUndersign(ruthie, clarke)\nMalposed(ruthie)\nUndersign(clarke, ruthie)\nMalposed(clarke)\nnot Cadaverous(clarke)\nConvolute(clarke, gunilla)\nnot Convolute(clarke, ruthie)\nnot Jactitate(clarke, gunilla)\nUndersign(clarke, gunilla) -> Jactitate(clarke, ruthie)\nUndersign(ruthie, gunilla) -> Galore(gunilla)\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Jactitate(x, clarke))\nUndersign(gunilla, clarke) -> not Cadaverous(clarke)\nforall x (Jactitate(x, clarke) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x, ruthie) -> Auriculate(ruthie))\nforall x (Convolute(x, gunilla) -> not Auriculate(x))\nJactitate(gunilla, ruthie) -> Jactitate(gunilla, clarke)\n\nnot Auriculate(clarke)\n\nConvolute(clarke, gunilla) and forall x (Convolute(x, gunilla) -> not Auriculate(x)) -> therefore not Auriculate(clarke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The tessi behoove the thaddeus. The tessi is peripheral. The tessi is not androgenic. The tessi currycomb the valencia. The tessi currycomb the thaddeus. The tessi hiss the valencia. The tessi hiss the thaddeus. The valencia behoove the tessi. The valencia behoove the thaddeus. The valencia is tenanted. The thaddeus behoove the valencia. The thaddeus is tenanted. The thaddeus is not prominent. The thaddeus currycomb the tessi. The thaddeus does not like the valencia. The thaddeus does not see the tessi. If the thaddeus behoove the tessi then the thaddeus hiss the valencia. If the valencia behoove the tessi then the tessi is peripheral. If something is androgenic then it hiss the thaddeus. If the tessi behoove the thaddeus then the thaddeus is not prominent. If something hiss the thaddeus then it is himalayan. If something currycomb the valencia then the valencia is androgenic. If something currycomb the tessi then it is not androgenic. If the tessi hiss the valencia then the tessi hiss the thaddeus. The tessi is not himalayan.", "logic": "\nBehoove(tessi, thaddeus)\nPeripheral(tessi)\nnot Androgenic(tessi)\nCurrycomb(tessi, valencia)\nCurrycomb(tessi, thaddeus)\nHiss(tessi, valencia)\nHiss(tessi, thaddeus)\nBehoove(valencia, tessi)\nBehoove(valencia, thaddeus)\nTenanted(valencia)\nBehoove(thaddeus, valencia)\nTenanted(thaddeus)\nnot Prominent(thaddeus)\nCurrycomb(thaddeus, tessi)\nnot Currycomb(thaddeus, valencia)\nnot Hiss(thaddeus, tessi)\nBehoove(thaddeus, tessi) -> Hiss(thaddeus, valencia)\nBehoove(valencia, tessi) -> Peripheral(tessi)\nforall x (Androgenic(x) -> Hiss(x, thaddeus))\nBehoove(tessi, thaddeus) -> not Prominent(thaddeus)\nforall x (Hiss(x, thaddeus) -> Himalayan(x))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, valencia) -> Androgenic(valencia))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, tessi) -> not Androgenic(x))\nHiss(tessi, valencia) -> Hiss(tessi, thaddeus)\n\nnot Himalayan(tessi)\n\nHiss(tessi, thaddeus) and forall x (Hiss(x, thaddeus) -> Himalayan(x)) -> therefore Himalayan(tessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The diannne omit the alanna. The diannne is forbidden. The diannne is not nonexempt. The diannne fidget the stacey. The diannne fidget the alanna. The diannne ruck the stacey. The diannne ruck the alanna. The stacey omit the diannne. The stacey omit the alanna. The stacey is hebraical. The alanna omit the stacey. The alanna is hebraical. The alanna is not veiled. The alanna fidget the diannne. The alanna does not like the stacey. The alanna does not see the diannne. If the alanna omit the diannne then the alanna ruck the stacey. If the stacey omit the diannne then the diannne is forbidden. If something is nonexempt then it ruck the alanna. If the diannne omit the alanna then the alanna is not veiled. If something ruck the alanna then it is azotemic. If something fidget the stacey then the stacey is nonexempt. If something fidget the diannne then it is not nonexempt. If the diannne ruck the stacey then the diannne ruck the alanna. The stacey ruck the alanna.", "logic": "\nOmit(diannne, alanna)\nForbidden(diannne)\nnot Nonexempt(diannne)\nFidget(diannne, stacey)\nFidget(diannne, alanna)\nRuck(diannne, stacey)\nRuck(diannne, alanna)\nOmit(stacey, diannne)\nOmit(stacey, alanna)\nHebraical(stacey)\nOmit(alanna, stacey)\nHebraical(alanna)\nnot Veiled(alanna)\nFidget(alanna, diannne)\nnot Fidget(alanna, stacey)\nnot Ruck(alanna, diannne)\nOmit(alanna, diannne) -> Ruck(alanna, stacey)\nOmit(stacey, diannne) -> Forbidden(diannne)\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Ruck(x, alanna))\nOmit(diannne, alanna) -> not Veiled(alanna)\nforall x (Ruck(x, alanna) -> Azotemic(x))\nforall x (Fidget(x, stacey) -> Nonexempt(stacey))\nforall x (Fidget(x, diannne) -> not Nonexempt(x))\nRuck(diannne, stacey) -> Ruck(diannne, alanna)\n\nRuck(stacey, alanna)\n\nFidget(diannne, stacey) and forall x (Fidget(x, stacey) -> Nonexempt(stacey)) -> therefore Nonexempt(stacey) Nonexempt(stacey) and forall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Ruck(x, alanna)) -> therefore Ruck(stacey, alanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The nert stimulate the elberta. The nert is chilean. The nert is not agile. The nert avulse the gregor. The nert avulse the elberta. The nert encompass the gregor. The nert encompass the elberta. The gregor stimulate the nert. The gregor stimulate the elberta. The gregor is crying. The elberta stimulate the gregor. The elberta is crying. The elberta is not subfusc. The elberta avulse the nert. The elberta does not like the gregor. The elberta does not see the nert. If the elberta stimulate the nert then the elberta encompass the gregor. If the gregor stimulate the nert then the nert is chilean. If something is agile then it encompass the elberta. If the nert stimulate the elberta then the elberta is not subfusc. If something encompass the elberta then it is breeding. If something avulse the gregor then the gregor is agile. If something avulse the nert then it is not agile. If the nert encompass the gregor then the nert encompass the elberta. The gregor does not see the elberta.", "logic": "\nStimulate(nert, elberta)\nChilean(nert)\nnot Agile(nert)\nAvulse(nert, gregor)\nAvulse(nert, elberta)\nEncompass(nert, gregor)\nEncompass(nert, elberta)\nStimulate(gregor, nert)\nStimulate(gregor, elberta)\nCrying(gregor)\nStimulate(elberta, gregor)\nCrying(elberta)\nnot Subfusc(elberta)\nAvulse(elberta, nert)\nnot Avulse(elberta, gregor)\nnot Encompass(elberta, nert)\nStimulate(elberta, nert) -> Encompass(elberta, gregor)\nStimulate(gregor, nert) -> Chilean(nert)\nforall x (Agile(x) -> Encompass(x, elberta))\nStimulate(nert, elberta) -> not Subfusc(elberta)\nforall x (Encompass(x, elberta) -> Breeding(x))\nforall x (Avulse(x, gregor) -> Agile(gregor))\nforall x (Avulse(x, nert) -> not Agile(x))\nEncompass(nert, gregor) -> Encompass(nert, elberta)\n\nnot Encompass(gregor, elberta)\n\nAvulse(nert, gregor) and forall x (Avulse(x, gregor) -> Agile(gregor)) -> therefore Agile(gregor) Agile(gregor) and forall x (Agile(x) -> Encompass(x, elberta)) -> therefore Encompass(gregor, elberta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The ashlen recoil the patsy. The ashlen is opportune. The ashlen is not unfaceted. The ashlen discourse the adrienne. The ashlen discourse the patsy. The ashlen accurse the adrienne. The ashlen accurse the patsy. The adrienne recoil the ashlen. The adrienne recoil the patsy. The adrienne is meatless. The patsy recoil the adrienne. The patsy is meatless. The patsy is not champion. The patsy discourse the ashlen. The patsy does not like the adrienne. The patsy does not see the ashlen. If the patsy recoil the ashlen then the patsy accurse the adrienne. If the adrienne recoil the ashlen then the ashlen is opportune. If something is unfaceted then it accurse the patsy. If the ashlen recoil the patsy then the patsy is not champion. If something accurse the patsy then it is unanswered. If something discourse the adrienne then the adrienne is unfaceted. If something discourse the ashlen then it is not unfaceted. If the ashlen accurse the adrienne then the ashlen accurse the patsy. The adrienne is unanswered.", "logic": "\nRecoil(ashlen, patsy)\nOpportune(ashlen)\nnot Unfaceted(ashlen)\nDiscourse(ashlen, adrienne)\nDiscourse(ashlen, patsy)\nAccurse(ashlen, adrienne)\nAccurse(ashlen, patsy)\nRecoil(adrienne, ashlen)\nRecoil(adrienne, patsy)\nMeatless(adrienne)\nRecoil(patsy, adrienne)\nMeatless(patsy)\nnot Champion(patsy)\nDiscourse(patsy, ashlen)\nnot Discourse(patsy, adrienne)\nnot Accurse(patsy, ashlen)\nRecoil(patsy, ashlen) -> Accurse(patsy, adrienne)\nRecoil(adrienne, ashlen) -> Opportune(ashlen)\nforall x (Unfaceted(x) -> Accurse(x, patsy))\nRecoil(ashlen, patsy) -> not Champion(patsy)\nforall x (Accurse(x, patsy) -> Unanswered(x))\nforall x (Discourse(x, adrienne) -> Unfaceted(adrienne))\nforall x (Discourse(x, ashlen) -> not Unfaceted(x))\nAccurse(ashlen, adrienne) -> Accurse(ashlen, patsy)\n\nUnanswered(adrienne)\n\nDiscourse(ashlen, adrienne) and forall x (Discourse(x, adrienne) -> Unfaceted(adrienne)) -> therefore Unfaceted(adrienne) Unfaceted(adrienne) and forall x (Unfaceted(x) -> Accurse(x, patsy)) -> therefore Accurse(adrienne, patsy) Accurse(adrienne, patsy) and forall x (Accurse(x, patsy) -> Unanswered(x)) -> therefore Unanswered(adrienne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The sheelah celebrate the abbey. The sheelah is calculated. The sheelah is not overactive. The sheelah commandeer the theo. The sheelah commandeer the abbey. The sheelah dropkick the theo. The sheelah dropkick the abbey. The theo celebrate the sheelah. The theo celebrate the abbey. The theo is cataclinal. The abbey celebrate the theo. The abbey is cataclinal. The abbey is not aplanatic. The abbey commandeer the sheelah. The abbey does not like the theo. The abbey does not see the sheelah. If the abbey celebrate the sheelah then the abbey dropkick the theo. If the theo celebrate the sheelah then the sheelah is calculated. If something is overactive then it dropkick the abbey. If the sheelah celebrate the abbey then the abbey is not aplanatic. If something dropkick the abbey then it is unfenced. If something commandeer the theo then the theo is overactive. If something commandeer the sheelah then it is not overactive. If the sheelah dropkick the theo then the sheelah dropkick the abbey. The theo is not unfenced.", "logic": "\nCelebrate(sheelah, abbey)\nCalculated(sheelah)\nnot Overactive(sheelah)\nCommandeer(sheelah, theo)\nCommandeer(sheelah, abbey)\nDropkick(sheelah, theo)\nDropkick(sheelah, abbey)\nCelebrate(theo, sheelah)\nCelebrate(theo, abbey)\nCataclinal(theo)\nCelebrate(abbey, theo)\nCataclinal(abbey)\nnot Aplanatic(abbey)\nCommandeer(abbey, sheelah)\nnot Commandeer(abbey, theo)\nnot Dropkick(abbey, sheelah)\nCelebrate(abbey, sheelah) -> Dropkick(abbey, theo)\nCelebrate(theo, sheelah) -> Calculated(sheelah)\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Dropkick(x, abbey))\nCelebrate(sheelah, abbey) -> not Aplanatic(abbey)\nforall x (Dropkick(x, abbey) -> Unfenced(x))\nforall x (Commandeer(x, theo) -> Overactive(theo))\nforall x (Commandeer(x, sheelah) -> not Overactive(x))\nDropkick(sheelah, theo) -> Dropkick(sheelah, abbey)\n\nnot Unfenced(theo)\n\nCommandeer(sheelah, theo) and forall x (Commandeer(x, theo) -> Overactive(theo)) -> therefore Overactive(theo) Overactive(theo) and forall x (Overactive(x) -> Dropkick(x, abbey)) -> therefore Dropkick(theo, abbey) Dropkick(theo, abbey) and forall x (Dropkick(x, abbey) -> Unfenced(x)) -> therefore Unfenced(theo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The acacia cantilever the ricca. The acacia is defined. The acacia is not curricular. The acacia whimper the ingrid. The acacia whimper the ricca. The acacia slave the ingrid. The acacia slave the ricca. The ingrid cantilever the acacia. The ingrid cantilever the ricca. The ingrid is flattering. The ricca cantilever the ingrid. The ricca is flattering. The ricca is not drowsy. The ricca whimper the acacia. The ricca does not like the ingrid. The ricca does not see the acacia. If the ricca cantilever the acacia then the ricca slave the ingrid. If the ingrid cantilever the acacia then the acacia is defined. If something is curricular then it slave the ricca. If the acacia cantilever the ricca then the ricca is not drowsy. If something slave the ricca then it is noisome. If something whimper the ingrid then the ingrid is curricular. If something whimper the acacia then it is not curricular. If the acacia slave the ingrid then the acacia slave the ricca. The ricca is not noisome.", "logic": "\nCantilever(acacia, ricca)\nDefined(acacia)\nnot Curricular(acacia)\nWhimper(acacia, ingrid)\nWhimper(acacia, ricca)\nSlave(acacia, ingrid)\nSlave(acacia, ricca)\nCantilever(ingrid, acacia)\nCantilever(ingrid, ricca)\nFlattering(ingrid)\nCantilever(ricca, ingrid)\nFlattering(ricca)\nnot Drowsy(ricca)\nWhimper(ricca, acacia)\nnot Whimper(ricca, ingrid)\nnot Slave(ricca, acacia)\nCantilever(ricca, acacia) -> Slave(ricca, ingrid)\nCantilever(ingrid, acacia) -> Defined(acacia)\nforall x (Curricular(x) -> Slave(x, ricca))\nCantilever(acacia, ricca) -> not Drowsy(ricca)\nforall x (Slave(x, ricca) -> Noisome(x))\nforall x (Whimper(x, ingrid) -> Curricular(ingrid))\nforall x (Whimper(x, acacia) -> not Curricular(x))\nSlave(acacia, ingrid) -> Slave(acacia, ricca)\n\nnot Noisome(ricca)\n\nforall x (Slave(x, ricca) -> Noisome(x)) <- forall x (Curricular(x) -> Slave(x, ricca)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The karsten impugn the jonell. The karsten is rearmost. The karsten is not unfriendly. The karsten doze the gonzalo. The karsten doze the jonell. The karsten faggot the gonzalo. The karsten faggot the jonell. The gonzalo impugn the karsten. The gonzalo impugn the jonell. The gonzalo is cockney. The jonell impugn the gonzalo. The jonell is cockney. The jonell is not unexacting. The jonell doze the karsten. The jonell does not like the gonzalo. The jonell does not see the karsten. If the jonell impugn the karsten then the jonell faggot the gonzalo. If the gonzalo impugn the karsten then the karsten is rearmost. If something is unfriendly then it faggot the jonell. If the karsten impugn the jonell then the jonell is not unexacting. If something faggot the jonell then it is bromidic. If something doze the gonzalo then the gonzalo is unfriendly. If something doze the karsten then it is not unfriendly. If the karsten faggot the gonzalo then the karsten faggot the jonell. The jonell faggot the jonell.", "logic": "\nImpugn(karsten, jonell)\nRearmost(karsten)\nnot Unfriendly(karsten)\nDoze(karsten, gonzalo)\nDoze(karsten, jonell)\nFaggot(karsten, gonzalo)\nFaggot(karsten, jonell)\nImpugn(gonzalo, karsten)\nImpugn(gonzalo, jonell)\nCockney(gonzalo)\nImpugn(jonell, gonzalo)\nCockney(jonell)\nnot Unexacting(jonell)\nDoze(jonell, karsten)\nnot Doze(jonell, gonzalo)\nnot Faggot(jonell, karsten)\nImpugn(jonell, karsten) -> Faggot(jonell, gonzalo)\nImpugn(gonzalo, karsten) -> Rearmost(karsten)\nforall x (Unfriendly(x) -> Faggot(x, jonell))\nImpugn(karsten, jonell) -> not Unexacting(jonell)\nforall x (Faggot(x, jonell) -> Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Doze(x, gonzalo) -> Unfriendly(gonzalo))\nforall x (Doze(x, karsten) -> not Unfriendly(x))\nFaggot(karsten, gonzalo) -> Faggot(karsten, jonell)\n\nFaggot(jonell, jonell)\n\nforall x (Unfriendly(x) -> Faggot(x, jonell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The pedro cart the emmit. The pedro is tref. The pedro is not bridal. The pedro negate the marney. The pedro negate the emmit. The pedro deafen the marney. The pedro deafen the emmit. The marney cart the pedro. The marney cart the emmit. The marney is pyaemic. The emmit cart the marney. The emmit is pyaemic. The emmit is not methodical. The emmit negate the pedro. The emmit does not like the marney. The emmit does not see the pedro. If the emmit cart the pedro then the emmit deafen the marney. If the marney cart the pedro then the pedro is tref. If something is bridal then it deafen the emmit. If the pedro cart the emmit then the emmit is not methodical. If something deafen the emmit then it is devalued. If something negate the marney then the marney is bridal. If something negate the pedro then it is not bridal. If the pedro deafen the marney then the pedro deafen the emmit. The emmit does not see the marney.", "logic": "\nCart(pedro, emmit)\nTref(pedro)\nnot Bridal(pedro)\nNegate(pedro, marney)\nNegate(pedro, emmit)\nDeafen(pedro, marney)\nDeafen(pedro, emmit)\nCart(marney, pedro)\nCart(marney, emmit)\nPyaemic(marney)\nCart(emmit, marney)\nPyaemic(emmit)\nnot Methodical(emmit)\nNegate(emmit, pedro)\nnot Negate(emmit, marney)\nnot Deafen(emmit, pedro)\nCart(emmit, pedro) -> Deafen(emmit, marney)\nCart(marney, pedro) -> Tref(pedro)\nforall x (Bridal(x) -> Deafen(x, emmit))\nCart(pedro, emmit) -> not Methodical(emmit)\nforall x (Deafen(x, emmit) -> Devalued(x))\nforall x (Negate(x, marney) -> Bridal(marney))\nforall x (Negate(x, pedro) -> not Bridal(x))\nDeafen(pedro, marney) -> Deafen(pedro, emmit)\n\nnot Deafen(emmit, marney)\n\nCart(emmit, pedro) -> Deafen(emmit, marney) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The dione impel the minette. The dione is spongy. The dione is not mocking. The dione implant the germain. The dione implant the minette. The dione favor the germain. The dione favor the minette. The germain impel the dione. The germain impel the minette. The germain is small. The minette impel the germain. The minette is small. The minette is not ellipsoid. The minette implant the dione. The minette does not like the germain. The minette does not see the dione. If the minette impel the dione then the minette favor the germain. If the germain impel the dione then the dione is spongy. If something is mocking then it favor the minette. If the dione impel the minette then the minette is not ellipsoid. If something favor the minette then it is apnoeic. If something implant the germain then the germain is mocking. If something implant the dione then it is not mocking. If the dione favor the germain then the dione favor the minette. The dione impel the dione.", "logic": "\nImpel(dione, minette)\nSpongy(dione)\nnot Mocking(dione)\nImplant(dione, germain)\nImplant(dione, minette)\nFavor(dione, germain)\nFavor(dione, minette)\nImpel(germain, dione)\nImpel(germain, minette)\nSmall(germain)\nImpel(minette, germain)\nSmall(minette)\nnot Ellipsoid(minette)\nImplant(minette, dione)\nnot Implant(minette, germain)\nnot Favor(minette, dione)\nImpel(minette, dione) -> Favor(minette, germain)\nImpel(germain, dione) -> Spongy(dione)\nforall x (Mocking(x) -> Favor(x, minette))\nImpel(dione, minette) -> not Ellipsoid(minette)\nforall x (Favor(x, minette) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Implant(x, germain) -> Mocking(germain))\nforall x (Implant(x, dione) -> not Mocking(x))\nFavor(dione, germain) -> Favor(dione, minette)\n\nImpel(dione, dione)\n\nImpel(dione, dione) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The jen overfeed the tammie. The jen is castrated. The jen is not benignant. The jen sack the lucio. The jen sack the tammie. The jen assure the lucio. The jen assure the tammie. The lucio overfeed the jen. The lucio overfeed the tammie. The lucio is marian. The tammie overfeed the lucio. The tammie is marian. The tammie is not ceramic. The tammie sack the jen. The tammie does not like the lucio. The tammie does not see the jen. If the tammie overfeed the jen then the tammie assure the lucio. If the lucio overfeed the jen then the jen is castrated. If something is benignant then it assure the tammie. If the jen overfeed the tammie then the tammie is not ceramic. If something assure the tammie then it is pyemic. If something sack the lucio then the lucio is benignant. If something sack the jen then it is not benignant. If the jen assure the lucio then the jen assure the tammie. The lucio does not see the lucio.", "logic": "\nOverfeed(jen, tammie)\nCastrated(jen)\nnot Benignant(jen)\nSack(jen, lucio)\nSack(jen, tammie)\nAssure(jen, lucio)\nAssure(jen, tammie)\nOverfeed(lucio, jen)\nOverfeed(lucio, tammie)\nMarian(lucio)\nOverfeed(tammie, lucio)\nMarian(tammie)\nnot Ceramic(tammie)\nSack(tammie, jen)\nnot Sack(tammie, lucio)\nnot Assure(tammie, jen)\nOverfeed(tammie, jen) -> Assure(tammie, lucio)\nOverfeed(lucio, jen) -> Castrated(jen)\nforall x (Benignant(x) -> Assure(x, tammie))\nOverfeed(jen, tammie) -> not Ceramic(tammie)\nforall x (Assure(x, tammie) -> Pyemic(x))\nforall x (Sack(x, lucio) -> Benignant(lucio))\nforall x (Sack(x, jen) -> not Benignant(x))\nAssure(jen, lucio) -> Assure(jen, tammie)\n\nnot Assure(lucio, lucio)\n\nnot Assure(lucio, lucio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The verile form the nilson. The verile is bounderish. The verile is not motivated. The verile cranch the maddalena. The verile cranch the nilson. The verile escort the maddalena. The verile escort the nilson. The maddalena form the verile. The maddalena form the nilson. The maddalena is chalky. The nilson form the maddalena. The nilson is chalky. The nilson is not deathly. The nilson cranch the verile. The nilson does not like the maddalena. The nilson does not see the verile. If the nilson form the verile then the nilson escort the maddalena. If the maddalena form the verile then the verile is bounderish. If something is motivated then it escort the nilson. If the verile form the nilson then the nilson is not deathly. If something escort the nilson then it is outsized. If something cranch the maddalena then the maddalena is motivated. If something cranch the verile then it is not motivated. If the verile escort the maddalena then the verile escort the nilson. The maddalena cranch the nilson.", "logic": "\nForm(verile, nilson)\nBounderish(verile)\nnot Motivated(verile)\nCranch(verile, maddalena)\nCranch(verile, nilson)\nEscort(verile, maddalena)\nEscort(verile, nilson)\nForm(maddalena, verile)\nForm(maddalena, nilson)\nChalky(maddalena)\nForm(nilson, maddalena)\nChalky(nilson)\nnot Deathly(nilson)\nCranch(nilson, verile)\nnot Cranch(nilson, maddalena)\nnot Escort(nilson, verile)\nForm(nilson, verile) -> Escort(nilson, maddalena)\nForm(maddalena, verile) -> Bounderish(verile)\nforall x (Motivated(x) -> Escort(x, nilson))\nForm(verile, nilson) -> not Deathly(nilson)\nforall x (Escort(x, nilson) -> Outsized(x))\nforall x (Cranch(x, maddalena) -> Motivated(maddalena))\nforall x (Cranch(x, verile) -> not Motivated(x))\nEscort(verile, maddalena) -> Escort(verile, nilson)\n\nCranch(maddalena, nilson)\n\nCranch(maddalena, nilson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The leia lysogenize the happy. The leia is faultless. The leia is not warring. The leia chairman the moreen. The leia chairman the happy. The leia weep the moreen. The leia weep the happy. The moreen lysogenize the leia. The moreen lysogenize the happy. The moreen is gibbose. The happy lysogenize the moreen. The happy is gibbose. The happy is not adrenergic. The happy chairman the leia. The happy does not like the moreen. The happy does not see the leia. If the happy lysogenize the leia then the happy weep the moreen. If the moreen lysogenize the leia then the leia is faultless. If something is warring then it weep the happy. If the leia lysogenize the happy then the happy is not adrenergic. If something weep the happy then it is airlike. If something chairman the moreen then the moreen is warring. If something chairman the leia then it is not warring. If the leia weep the moreen then the leia weep the happy. The moreen does not eat the moreen.", "logic": "\nLysogenize(leia, happy)\nFaultless(leia)\nnot Warring(leia)\nChairman(leia, moreen)\nChairman(leia, happy)\nWeep(leia, moreen)\nWeep(leia, happy)\nLysogenize(moreen, leia)\nLysogenize(moreen, happy)\nGibbose(moreen)\nLysogenize(happy, moreen)\nGibbose(happy)\nnot Adrenergic(happy)\nChairman(happy, leia)\nnot Chairman(happy, moreen)\nnot Weep(happy, leia)\nLysogenize(happy, leia) -> Weep(happy, moreen)\nLysogenize(moreen, leia) -> Faultless(leia)\nforall x (Warring(x) -> Weep(x, happy))\nLysogenize(leia, happy) -> not Adrenergic(happy)\nforall x (Weep(x, happy) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Chairman(x, moreen) -> Warring(moreen))\nforall x (Chairman(x, leia) -> not Warring(x))\nWeep(leia, moreen) -> Weep(leia, happy)\n\nnot Lysogenize(moreen, moreen)\n\nnot Lysogenize(moreen, moreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The torrence delight the madlen. The torrence is adjuvant. The torrence is not attired. The torrence claw the coraline. The torrence claw the madlen. The torrence circumcise the coraline. The torrence circumcise the madlen. The coraline delight the torrence. The coraline delight the madlen. The coraline is evidenced. The madlen delight the coraline. The madlen is evidenced. The madlen is not impassive. The madlen claw the torrence. The madlen does not like the coraline. The madlen does not see the torrence. If the madlen delight the torrence then the madlen circumcise the coraline. If the coraline delight the torrence then the torrence is adjuvant. If something is attired then it circumcise the madlen. If the torrence delight the madlen then the madlen is not impassive. If something circumcise the madlen then it is worsening. If something claw the coraline then the coraline is attired. If something claw the torrence then it is not attired. If the torrence circumcise the coraline then the torrence circumcise the madlen. The torrence circumcise the torrence.", "logic": "\nDelight(torrence, madlen)\nAdjuvant(torrence)\nnot Attired(torrence)\nClaw(torrence, coraline)\nClaw(torrence, madlen)\nCircumcise(torrence, coraline)\nCircumcise(torrence, madlen)\nDelight(coraline, torrence)\nDelight(coraline, madlen)\nEvidenced(coraline)\nDelight(madlen, coraline)\nEvidenced(madlen)\nnot Impassive(madlen)\nClaw(madlen, torrence)\nnot Claw(madlen, coraline)\nnot Circumcise(madlen, torrence)\nDelight(madlen, torrence) -> Circumcise(madlen, coraline)\nDelight(coraline, torrence) -> Adjuvant(torrence)\nforall x (Attired(x) -> Circumcise(x, madlen))\nDelight(torrence, madlen) -> not Impassive(madlen)\nforall x (Circumcise(x, madlen) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Claw(x, coraline) -> Attired(coraline))\nforall x (Claw(x, torrence) -> not Attired(x))\nCircumcise(torrence, coraline) -> Circumcise(torrence, madlen)\n\nCircumcise(torrence, torrence)\n\nCircumcise(torrence, torrence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The sherye is ebon. If someone is briery and ebon then they are northeast. If the sherye is northeast then the sherye is veterinary. Nice people are briery. The sherye is ebon.", "logic": "\nEbon(sherye)\nforall x (Briery(x) and Ebon(x) -> Northeast(x))\nNortheast(sherye) -> Veterinary(sherye)\nforall x (Ebon(x) -> Briery(x))\n\nEbon(sherye)\n\ntherefore Ebon(sherye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The lucien is gainly. If someone is atrophic and gainly then they are greek. If the lucien is greek then the lucien is criterial. Nice people are atrophic. The lucien is not gainly.", "logic": "\nGainly(lucien)\nforall x (Atrophic(x) and Gainly(x) -> Greek(x))\nGreek(lucien) -> Criterial(lucien)\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> Atrophic(x))\n\nnot Gainly(lucien)\n\ntherefore Gainly(lucien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The rodney is envious. If someone is sensitised and envious then they are unbeaten. If the rodney is unbeaten then the rodney is untested. Nice people are sensitised. The rodney is sensitised.", "logic": "\nEnvious(rodney)\nforall x (Sensitised(x) and Envious(x) -> Unbeaten(x))\nUnbeaten(rodney) -> Untested(rodney)\nforall x (Envious(x) -> Sensitised(x))\n\nSensitised(rodney)\n\nEnvious(rodney) and forall x (Envious(x) -> Sensitised(x)) -> therefore Sensitised(rodney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The jae is pictorial. If someone is sunstruck and pictorial then they are branded. If the jae is branded then the jae is cumuliform. Nice people are sunstruck. The jae is not sunstruck.", "logic": "\nPictorial(jae)\nforall x (Sunstruck(x) and Pictorial(x) -> Branded(x))\nBranded(jae) -> Cumuliform(jae)\nforall x (Pictorial(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\n\nnot Sunstruck(jae)\n\nPictorial(jae) and forall x (Pictorial(x) -> Sunstruck(x)) -> therefore Sunstruck(jae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The gamaliel is sacerdotal. If someone is transfixed and sacerdotal then they are midway. If the gamaliel is midway then the gamaliel is recreant. Nice people are transfixed. The gamaliel is midway.", "logic": "\nSacerdotal(gamaliel)\nforall x (Transfixed(x) and Sacerdotal(x) -> Midway(x))\nMidway(gamaliel) -> Recreant(gamaliel)\nforall x (Sacerdotal(x) -> Transfixed(x))\n\nMidway(gamaliel)\n\nSacerdotal(gamaliel) and forall x (Sacerdotal(x) -> Transfixed(x)) -> therefore Transfixed(gamaliel) Transfixed(gamaliel) and Sacerdotal(gamaliel) and forall x (Transfixed(x) and Sacerdotal(x) -> Midway(x)) -> therefore Midway(gamaliel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The shena is ebionite. If someone is respondent and ebionite then they are rumanian. If the shena is rumanian then the shena is bust. Nice people are respondent. The shena is not rumanian.", "logic": "\nEbionite(shena)\nforall x (Respondent(x) and Ebionite(x) -> Rumanian(x))\nRumanian(shena) -> Bust(shena)\nforall x (Ebionite(x) -> Respondent(x))\n\nnot Rumanian(shena)\n\nEbionite(shena) and forall x (Ebionite(x) -> Respondent(x)) -> therefore Respondent(shena) Respondent(shena) and Ebionite(shena) and forall x (Respondent(x) and Ebionite(x) -> Rumanian(x)) -> therefore Rumanian(shena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The dasie is moronic. If someone is alfresco and moronic then they are unwearied. If the dasie is unwearied then the dasie is indecent. Nice people are alfresco. The dasie is indecent.", "logic": "\nMoronic(dasie)\nforall x (Alfresco(x) and Moronic(x) -> Unwearied(x))\nUnwearied(dasie) -> Indecent(dasie)\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Alfresco(x))\n\nIndecent(dasie)\n\nMoronic(dasie) and forall x (Moronic(x) -> Alfresco(x)) -> therefore Alfresco(dasie) Alfresco(dasie) and Moronic(dasie) and forall x (Alfresco(x) and Moronic(x) -> Unwearied(x)) -> therefore Unwearied(dasie) Unwearied(dasie) and Unwearied(dasie) -> Indecent(dasie) -> therefore Indecent(dasie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The umeko is prototypic. If someone is calceiform and prototypic then they are fallow. If the umeko is fallow then the umeko is solidified. Nice people are calceiform. The umeko is not solidified.", "logic": "\nPrototypic(umeko)\nforall x (Calceiform(x) and Prototypic(x) -> Fallow(x))\nFallow(umeko) -> Solidified(umeko)\nforall x (Prototypic(x) -> Calceiform(x))\n\nnot Solidified(umeko)\n\nPrototypic(umeko) and forall x (Prototypic(x) -> Calceiform(x)) -> therefore Calceiform(umeko) Calceiform(umeko) and Prototypic(umeko) and forall x (Calceiform(x) and Prototypic(x) -> Fallow(x)) -> therefore Fallow(umeko) Fallow(umeko) and Fallow(umeko) -> Solidified(umeko) -> therefore Solidified(umeko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The douggie is lithuanian. If someone is spectacled and lithuanian then they are backed. If the douggie is backed then the douggie is afflicted. Nice people are spectacled. The douggie does not eat the douggie.", "logic": "\nLithuanian(douggie)\nforall x (Spectacled(x) and Lithuanian(x) -> Backed(x))\nBacked(douggie) -> Afflicted(douggie)\nforall x (Lithuanian(x) -> Spectacled(x))\n\nnot Eats(douggie, douggie)\n\nnot Eats(douggie, douggie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The juan is exchanged. If someone is firstborn and exchanged then they are monthly. If the juan is monthly then the juan is whispered. Nice people are firstborn. The juan needs the juan.", "logic": "\nExchanged(juan)\nforall x (Firstborn(x) and Exchanged(x) -> Monthly(x))\nMonthly(juan) -> Whispered(juan)\nforall x (Exchanged(x) -> Firstborn(x))\n\nNeeds(juan, juan)\n\nNeeds(juan, juan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The aurilia is inutile. If someone is italic and inutile then they are primal. If the aurilia is primal then the aurilia is ritzy. Nice people are italic. The aurilia does not like the aurilia.", "logic": "\nInutile(aurilia)\nforall x (Italic(x) and Inutile(x) -> Primal(x))\nPrimal(aurilia) -> Ritzy(aurilia)\nforall x (Inutile(x) -> Italic(x))\n\nnot Likes(aurilia, aurilia)\n\nnot Likes(aurilia, aurilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The jayne is decreased. If someone is pennate and decreased then they are zoonotic. If the jayne is zoonotic then the jayne is satyric. Nice people are pennate. The jayne is blue.", "logic": "\nDecreased(jayne)\nforall x (Pennate(x) and Decreased(x) -> Zoonotic(x))\nZoonotic(jayne) -> Satyric(jayne)\nforall x (Decreased(x) -> Pennate(x))\n\nBlue(jayne)\n\nBlue(jayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "Naomi is chylaceous. Naomi is solid. Naomi is brimful. Kathrine is xcvi. Kathrine is reflected. Kathrine is chylaceous. Kathrine is solid. Kathrine is brimful. Kathrine is transfixed. Kathrine is jocular. Blue things are brimful. If something is jocular and xcvi then it is transfixed. If Naomi is chylaceous and Naomi is reflected then Naomi is xcvi. Round, solid things are xcvi. If something is jocular and brimful then it is reflected. If something is xcvi then it is jocular. Kathrine is chylaceous.", "logic": "\nChylaceous(naomi)\nSolid(naomi)\nBrimful(naomi)\nXcvi(kathrine)\nReflected(kathrine)\nChylaceous(kathrine)\nSolid(kathrine)\nBrimful(kathrine)\nTransfixed(kathrine)\nJocular(kathrine)\nforall x (Reflected(x) -> Brimful(x))\nforall x (Jocular(x) and Xcvi(x) -> Transfixed(x))\nChylaceous(naomi) and Reflected(naomi) -> Xcvi(naomi)\nforall x (Brimful(x) and Solid(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Jocular(x) and Brimful(x) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Jocular(x))\n\nChylaceous(kathrine)\n\ntherefore Chylaceous(kathrine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Lezlie is footsure. Lezlie is aphaeretic. Lezlie is underlying. Aimee is squishy. Aimee is dioecious. Aimee is footsure. Aimee is aphaeretic. Aimee is underlying. Aimee is intestinal. Aimee is located. Blue things are underlying. If something is located and squishy then it is intestinal. If Lezlie is footsure and Lezlie is dioecious then Lezlie is squishy. Round, aphaeretic things are squishy. If something is located and underlying then it is dioecious. If something is squishy then it is located. Lezlie is not aphaeretic.", "logic": "\nFootsure(lezlie)\nAphaeretic(lezlie)\nUnderlying(lezlie)\nSquishy(aimee)\nDioecious(aimee)\nFootsure(aimee)\nAphaeretic(aimee)\nUnderlying(aimee)\nIntestinal(aimee)\nLocated(aimee)\nforall x (Dioecious(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Located(x) and Squishy(x) -> Intestinal(x))\nFootsure(lezlie) and Dioecious(lezlie) -> Squishy(lezlie)\nforall x (Underlying(x) and Aphaeretic(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Located(x) and Underlying(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Squishy(x) -> Located(x))\n\nnot Aphaeretic(lezlie)\n\ntherefore Aphaeretic(lezlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Waleed is unrefined. Waleed is organismal. Waleed is infrasonic. Georgiana is digestible. Georgiana is piebald. Georgiana is unrefined. Georgiana is organismal. Georgiana is infrasonic. Georgiana is fogged. Georgiana is fuzzed. Blue things are infrasonic. If something is fuzzed and digestible then it is fogged. If Waleed is unrefined and Waleed is piebald then Waleed is digestible. Round, organismal things are digestible. If something is fuzzed and infrasonic then it is piebald. If something is digestible then it is fuzzed. Waleed is digestible.", "logic": "\nUnrefined(waleed)\nOrganismal(waleed)\nInfrasonic(waleed)\nDigestible(georgiana)\nPiebald(georgiana)\nUnrefined(georgiana)\nOrganismal(georgiana)\nInfrasonic(georgiana)\nFogged(georgiana)\nFuzzed(georgiana)\nforall x (Piebald(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Digestible(x) -> Fogged(x))\nUnrefined(waleed) and Piebald(waleed) -> Digestible(waleed)\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) and Organismal(x) -> Digestible(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Infrasonic(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Digestible(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\n\nDigestible(waleed)\n\nInfrasonic(waleed) and Organismal(waleed) and forall x (Infrasonic(x) and Organismal(x) -> Digestible(x)) -> therefore Digestible(waleed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Morry is bespoken. Morry is pernickety. Morry is resident. Randee is sclerosed. Randee is conceptual. Randee is bespoken. Randee is pernickety. Randee is resident. Randee is graded. Randee is ovoid. Blue things are resident. If something is ovoid and sclerosed then it is graded. If Morry is bespoken and Morry is conceptual then Morry is sclerosed. Round, pernickety things are sclerosed. If something is ovoid and resident then it is conceptual. If something is sclerosed then it is ovoid. Morry is not sclerosed.", "logic": "\nBespoken(morry)\nPernickety(morry)\nResident(morry)\nSclerosed(randee)\nConceptual(randee)\nBespoken(randee)\nPernickety(randee)\nResident(randee)\nGraded(randee)\nOvoid(randee)\nforall x (Conceptual(x) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Ovoid(x) and Sclerosed(x) -> Graded(x))\nBespoken(morry) and Conceptual(morry) -> Sclerosed(morry)\nforall x (Resident(x) and Pernickety(x) -> Sclerosed(x))\nforall x (Ovoid(x) and Resident(x) -> Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Ovoid(x))\n\nnot Sclerosed(morry)\n\nResident(morry) and Pernickety(morry) and forall x (Resident(x) and Pernickety(x) -> Sclerosed(x)) -> therefore Sclerosed(morry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Adrianna is infective. Adrianna is chained. Adrianna is ocellated. Cain is champion. Cain is unthankful. Cain is infective. Cain is chained. Cain is ocellated. Cain is unfair. Cain is autosomal. Blue things are ocellated. If something is autosomal and champion then it is unfair. If Adrianna is infective and Adrianna is unthankful then Adrianna is champion. Round, chained things are champion. If something is autosomal and ocellated then it is unthankful. If something is champion then it is autosomal. Adrianna is autosomal.", "logic": "\nInfective(adrianna)\nChained(adrianna)\nOcellated(adrianna)\nChampion(cain)\nUnthankful(cain)\nInfective(cain)\nChained(cain)\nOcellated(cain)\nUnfair(cain)\nAutosomal(cain)\nforall x (Unthankful(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Champion(x) -> Unfair(x))\nInfective(adrianna) and Unthankful(adrianna) -> Champion(adrianna)\nforall x (Ocellated(x) and Chained(x) -> Champion(x))\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Ocellated(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Champion(x) -> Autosomal(x))\n\nAutosomal(adrianna)\n\nOcellated(adrianna) and Chained(adrianna) and forall x (Ocellated(x) and Chained(x) -> Champion(x)) -> therefore Champion(adrianna) Champion(adrianna) and forall x (Champion(x) -> Autosomal(x)) -> therefore Autosomal(adrianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Terrel is impolite. Terrel is able. Terrel is abulic. Barb is reserved. Barb is fathomable. Barb is impolite. Barb is able. Barb is abulic. Barb is flossy. Barb is nervous. Blue things are abulic. If something is nervous and reserved then it is flossy. If Terrel is impolite and Terrel is fathomable then Terrel is reserved. Round, able things are reserved. If something is nervous and abulic then it is fathomable. If something is reserved then it is nervous. Terrel is not nervous.", "logic": "\nImpolite(terrel)\nAble(terrel)\nAbulic(terrel)\nReserved(barb)\nFathomable(barb)\nImpolite(barb)\nAble(barb)\nAbulic(barb)\nFlossy(barb)\nNervous(barb)\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Abulic(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) and Reserved(x) -> Flossy(x))\nImpolite(terrel) and Fathomable(terrel) -> Reserved(terrel)\nforall x (Abulic(x) and Able(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) and Abulic(x) -> Fathomable(x))\nforall x (Reserved(x) -> Nervous(x))\n\nnot Nervous(terrel)\n\nAbulic(terrel) and Able(terrel) and forall x (Abulic(x) and Able(x) -> Reserved(x)) -> therefore Reserved(terrel) Reserved(terrel) and forall x (Reserved(x) -> Nervous(x)) -> therefore Nervous(terrel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Gerhardt is overmuch. Gerhardt is humdrum. Gerhardt is unheeding. Lonee is archaean. Lonee is ostensible. Lonee is overmuch. Lonee is humdrum. Lonee is unheeding. Lonee is garish. Lonee is ignitable. Blue things are unheeding. If something is ignitable and archaean then it is garish. If Gerhardt is overmuch and Gerhardt is ostensible then Gerhardt is archaean. Round, humdrum things are archaean. If something is ignitable and unheeding then it is ostensible. If something is archaean then it is ignitable. Gerhardt is ostensible.", "logic": "\nOvermuch(gerhardt)\nHumdrum(gerhardt)\nUnheeding(gerhardt)\nArchaean(lonee)\nOstensible(lonee)\nOvermuch(lonee)\nHumdrum(lonee)\nUnheeding(lonee)\nGarish(lonee)\nIgnitable(lonee)\nforall x (Ostensible(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and Archaean(x) -> Garish(x))\nOvermuch(gerhardt) and Ostensible(gerhardt) -> Archaean(gerhardt)\nforall x (Unheeding(x) and Humdrum(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and Unheeding(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Ignitable(x))\n\nOstensible(gerhardt)\n\nUnheeding(gerhardt) and Humdrum(gerhardt) and forall x (Unheeding(x) and Humdrum(x) -> Archaean(x)) -> therefore Archaean(gerhardt) Archaean(gerhardt) and forall x (Archaean(x) -> Ignitable(x)) -> therefore Ignitable(gerhardt) Ignitable(gerhardt) and Unheeding(gerhardt) and forall x (Ignitable(x) and Unheeding(x) -> Ostensible(x)) -> therefore Ostensible(gerhardt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Hagen is dour. Hagen is equipoised. Hagen is continued. Sybyl is unclean. Sybyl is broached. Sybyl is dour. Sybyl is equipoised. Sybyl is continued. Sybyl is laryngeal. Sybyl is ischemic. Blue things are continued. If something is ischemic and unclean then it is laryngeal. If Hagen is dour and Hagen is broached then Hagen is unclean. Round, equipoised things are unclean. If something is ischemic and continued then it is broached. If something is unclean then it is ischemic. Hagen is not laryngeal.", "logic": "\nDour(hagen)\nEquipoised(hagen)\nContinued(hagen)\nUnclean(sybyl)\nBroached(sybyl)\nDour(sybyl)\nEquipoised(sybyl)\nContinued(sybyl)\nLaryngeal(sybyl)\nIschemic(sybyl)\nforall x (Broached(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) and Unclean(x) -> Laryngeal(x))\nDour(hagen) and Broached(hagen) -> Unclean(hagen)\nforall x (Continued(x) and Equipoised(x) -> Unclean(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) and Continued(x) -> Broached(x))\nforall x (Unclean(x) -> Ischemic(x))\n\nnot Laryngeal(hagen)\n\nContinued(hagen) and Equipoised(hagen) and forall x (Continued(x) and Equipoised(x) -> Unclean(x)) -> therefore Unclean(hagen) Unclean(hagen) and forall x (Unclean(x) -> Ischemic(x)) -> therefore Ischemic(hagen) Continued(hagen) and Equipoised(hagen) and forall x (Continued(x) and Equipoised(x) -> Unclean(x)) -> therefore Unclean(hagen) Ischemic(hagen) and Unclean(hagen) and forall x (Ischemic(x) and Unclean(x) -> Laryngeal(x)) -> therefore Laryngeal(hagen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Karoline is offhanded. Karoline is euclidean. Karoline is not eparchial. Karoline is pinnated. Stefano is offhanded. Stefano is eparchial. Stefano is sliced. Nice things are separatist. All eparchial, separatist things are sliced. If Stefano is offhanded and Stefano is pinnated then Stefano is sliced. If something is offhanded and not separatist then it is perturbed. All separatist things are perturbed. If something is separatist and perturbed then it is euclidean. All pinnated things are euclidean. If something is pinnated then it is euclidean. Stefano is eparchial.", "logic": "\nOffhanded(karoline)\nEuclidean(karoline)\nnot Eparchial(karoline)\nPinnated(karoline)\nOffhanded(stefano)\nEparchial(stefano)\nSliced(stefano)\nforall x (Eparchial(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Eparchial(x) and Separatist(x) -> Sliced(x))\nOffhanded(stefano) and Pinnated(stefano) -> Sliced(stefano)\nforall x (Offhanded(x) and not Separatist(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) and Perturbed(x) -> Euclidean(x))\nforall x (Pinnated(x) -> Euclidean(x))\nforall x (Pinnated(x) -> Euclidean(x))\n\nEparchial(stefano)\n\ntherefore Eparchial(stefano)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Theobald is nonexempt. Theobald is diadromous. Theobald is not arcadian. Theobald is affined. Ardeen is nonexempt. Ardeen is arcadian. Ardeen is barbadian. Nice things are sacrosanct. All arcadian, sacrosanct things are barbadian. If Ardeen is nonexempt and Ardeen is affined then Ardeen is barbadian. If something is nonexempt and not sacrosanct then it is cyclopean. All sacrosanct things are cyclopean. If something is sacrosanct and cyclopean then it is diadromous. All affined things are diadromous. If something is affined then it is diadromous. Theobald is arcadian.", "logic": "\nNonexempt(theobald)\nDiadromous(theobald)\nnot Arcadian(theobald)\nAffined(theobald)\nNonexempt(ardeen)\nArcadian(ardeen)\nBarbadian(ardeen)\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> Sacrosanct(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) and Sacrosanct(x) -> Barbadian(x))\nNonexempt(ardeen) and Affined(ardeen) -> Barbadian(ardeen)\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) and not Sacrosanct(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Cyclopean(x) -> Diadromous(x))\nforall x (Affined(x) -> Diadromous(x))\nforall x (Affined(x) -> Diadromous(x))\n\nArcadian(theobald)\n\ntherefore not Arcadian(theobald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Valenka is boughed. Valenka is stifled. Valenka is not divisible. Valenka is dinky. Mack is boughed. Mack is divisible. Mack is sown. Nice things are mystifying. All divisible, mystifying things are sown. If Mack is boughed and Mack is dinky then Mack is sown. If something is boughed and not mystifying then it is tangible. All mystifying things are tangible. If something is mystifying and tangible then it is stifled. All dinky things are stifled. If something is dinky then it is stifled. Mack is mystifying.", "logic": "\nBoughed(valenka)\nStifled(valenka)\nnot Divisible(valenka)\nDinky(valenka)\nBoughed(mack)\nDivisible(mack)\nSown(mack)\nforall x (Divisible(x) -> Mystifying(x))\nforall x (Divisible(x) and Mystifying(x) -> Sown(x))\nBoughed(mack) and Dinky(mack) -> Sown(mack)\nforall x (Boughed(x) and not Mystifying(x) -> Tangible(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) -> Tangible(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) and Tangible(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Stifled(x))\n\nMystifying(mack)\n\nDivisible(mack) and forall x (Divisible(x) -> Mystifying(x)) -> therefore Mystifying(mack)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Bendite is phenotypic. Bendite is sulphuric. Bendite is not actinoid. Bendite is slapstick. Odilia is phenotypic. Odilia is actinoid. Odilia is ovine. Nice things are reechoing. All actinoid, reechoing things are ovine. If Odilia is phenotypic and Odilia is slapstick then Odilia is ovine. If something is phenotypic and not reechoing then it is greater. All reechoing things are greater. If something is reechoing and greater then it is sulphuric. All slapstick things are sulphuric. If something is slapstick then it is sulphuric. Odilia is not reechoing.", "logic": "\nPhenotypic(bendite)\nSulphuric(bendite)\nnot Actinoid(bendite)\nSlapstick(bendite)\nPhenotypic(odilia)\nActinoid(odilia)\nOvine(odilia)\nforall x (Actinoid(x) -> Reechoing(x))\nforall x (Actinoid(x) and Reechoing(x) -> Ovine(x))\nPhenotypic(odilia) and Slapstick(odilia) -> Ovine(odilia)\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) and not Reechoing(x) -> Greater(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) -> Greater(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) and Greater(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Slapstick(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\nforall x (Slapstick(x) -> Sulphuric(x))\n\nnot Reechoing(odilia)\n\nActinoid(odilia) and forall x (Actinoid(x) -> Reechoing(x)) -> therefore Reechoing(odilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Ewan is roguish. Ewan is eremitical. Ewan is not soprano. Ewan is inbred. Myranda is roguish. Myranda is soprano. Myranda is afoul. Nice things are planted. All soprano, planted things are afoul. If Myranda is roguish and Myranda is inbred then Myranda is afoul. If something is roguish and not planted then it is grim. All planted things are grim. If something is planted and grim then it is eremitical. All inbred things are eremitical. If something is inbred then it is eremitical. Myranda is grim.", "logic": "\nRoguish(ewan)\nEremitical(ewan)\nnot Soprano(ewan)\nInbred(ewan)\nRoguish(myranda)\nSoprano(myranda)\nAfoul(myranda)\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> Planted(x))\nforall x (Soprano(x) and Planted(x) -> Afoul(x))\nRoguish(myranda) and Inbred(myranda) -> Afoul(myranda)\nforall x (Roguish(x) and not Planted(x) -> Grim(x))\nforall x (Planted(x) -> Grim(x))\nforall x (Planted(x) and Grim(x) -> Eremitical(x))\nforall x (Inbred(x) -> Eremitical(x))\nforall x (Inbred(x) -> Eremitical(x))\n\nGrim(myranda)\n\nSoprano(myranda) and forall x (Soprano(x) -> Planted(x)) -> therefore Planted(myranda) Planted(myranda) and forall x (Planted(x) -> Grim(x)) -> therefore Grim(myranda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Raychel is excellent. Raychel is freelance. Raychel is not gaussian. Raychel is sunstruck. Sisely is excellent. Sisely is gaussian. Sisely is keeled. Nice things are permed. All gaussian, permed things are keeled. If Sisely is excellent and Sisely is sunstruck then Sisely is keeled. If something is excellent and not permed then it is burbling. All permed things are burbling. If something is permed and burbling then it is freelance. All sunstruck things are freelance. If something is sunstruck then it is freelance. Sisely is not burbling.", "logic": "\nExcellent(raychel)\nFreelance(raychel)\nnot Gaussian(raychel)\nSunstruck(raychel)\nExcellent(sisely)\nGaussian(sisely)\nKeeled(sisely)\nforall x (Gaussian(x) -> Permed(x))\nforall x (Gaussian(x) and Permed(x) -> Keeled(x))\nExcellent(sisely) and Sunstruck(sisely) -> Keeled(sisely)\nforall x (Excellent(x) and not Permed(x) -> Burbling(x))\nforall x (Permed(x) -> Burbling(x))\nforall x (Permed(x) and Burbling(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Sunstruck(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Sunstruck(x) -> Freelance(x))\n\nnot Burbling(sisely)\n\nGaussian(sisely) and forall x (Gaussian(x) -> Permed(x)) -> therefore Permed(sisely) Permed(sisely) and forall x (Permed(x) -> Burbling(x)) -> therefore Burbling(sisely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Eudora is bicameral. Eudora is timorous. Eudora is not pubic. Eudora is erogenous. Nickey is bicameral. Nickey is pubic. Nickey is energising. Nice things are bareback. All pubic, bareback things are energising. If Nickey is bicameral and Nickey is erogenous then Nickey is energising. If something is bicameral and not bareback then it is huffish. All bareback things are huffish. If something is bareback and huffish then it is timorous. All erogenous things are timorous. If something is erogenous then it is timorous. Nickey is timorous.", "logic": "\nBicameral(eudora)\nTimorous(eudora)\nnot Pubic(eudora)\nErogenous(eudora)\nBicameral(nickey)\nPubic(nickey)\nEnergising(nickey)\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Bareback(x))\nforall x (Pubic(x) and Bareback(x) -> Energising(x))\nBicameral(nickey) and Erogenous(nickey) -> Energising(nickey)\nforall x (Bicameral(x) and not Bareback(x) -> Huffish(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) -> Huffish(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Huffish(x) -> Timorous(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Timorous(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Timorous(x))\n\nTimorous(nickey)\n\nPubic(nickey) and forall x (Pubic(x) -> Bareback(x)) -> therefore Bareback(nickey) Pubic(nickey) and forall x (Pubic(x) -> Bareback(x)) -> therefore Bareback(nickey) Bareback(nickey) and forall x (Bareback(x) -> Huffish(x)) -> therefore Huffish(nickey) Bareback(nickey) and Huffish(nickey) and forall x (Bareback(x) and Huffish(x) -> Timorous(x)) -> therefore Timorous(nickey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Cassi is flexile. Cassi is laudatory. Cassi is not humorous. Cassi is untitled. Odille is flexile. Odille is humorous. Odille is hemophilic. Nice things are veridical. All humorous, veridical things are hemophilic. If Odille is flexile and Odille is untitled then Odille is hemophilic. If something is flexile and not veridical then it is crookback. All veridical things are crookback. If something is veridical and crookback then it is laudatory. All untitled things are laudatory. If something is untitled then it is laudatory. Odille is not laudatory.", "logic": "\nFlexile(cassi)\nLaudatory(cassi)\nnot Humorous(cassi)\nUntitled(cassi)\nFlexile(odille)\nHumorous(odille)\nHemophilic(odille)\nforall x (Humorous(x) -> Veridical(x))\nforall x (Humorous(x) and Veridical(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nFlexile(odille) and Untitled(odille) -> Hemophilic(odille)\nforall x (Flexile(x) and not Veridical(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Veridical(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Veridical(x) and Crookback(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Untitled(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Untitled(x) -> Laudatory(x))\n\nnot Laudatory(odille)\n\nHumorous(odille) and forall x (Humorous(x) -> Veridical(x)) -> therefore Veridical(odille) Humorous(odille) and forall x (Humorous(x) -> Veridical(x)) -> therefore Veridical(odille) Veridical(odille) and forall x (Veridical(x) -> Crookback(x)) -> therefore Crookback(odille) Veridical(odille) and Crookback(odille) and forall x (Veridical(x) and Crookback(x) -> Laudatory(x)) -> therefore Laudatory(odille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Gwenny is escaped. Gwenny is expiratory. Gwenny is not stern. Gwenny is insurable. Deni is escaped. Deni is stern. Deni is simple. Nice things are woollen. All stern, woollen things are simple. If Deni is escaped and Deni is insurable then Deni is simple. If something is escaped and not woollen then it is censorial. All woollen things are censorial. If something is woollen and censorial then it is expiratory. All insurable things are expiratory. If something is insurable then it is expiratory. Gwenny is not censorial.", "logic": "\nEscaped(gwenny)\nExpiratory(gwenny)\nnot Stern(gwenny)\nInsurable(gwenny)\nEscaped(deni)\nStern(deni)\nSimple(deni)\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Woollen(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) and Woollen(x) -> Simple(x))\nEscaped(deni) and Insurable(deni) -> Simple(deni)\nforall x (Escaped(x) and not Woollen(x) -> Censorial(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) -> Censorial(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) and Censorial(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nforall x (Insurable(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nforall x (Insurable(x) -> Expiratory(x))\n\nnot Censorial(gwenny)\n\nforall x (Woollen(x) -> Censorial(x)) <- forall x (Stern(x) -> Woollen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Munmro is raiseable. Munmro is lidded. Munmro is not premium. Munmro is implike. Roby is raiseable. Roby is premium. Roby is trim. Nice things are atrophic. All premium, atrophic things are trim. If Roby is raiseable and Roby is implike then Roby is trim. If something is raiseable and not atrophic then it is untipped. All atrophic things are untipped. If something is atrophic and untipped then it is lidded. All implike things are lidded. If something is implike then it is lidded. Munmro is trim.", "logic": "\nRaiseable(munmro)\nLidded(munmro)\nnot Premium(munmro)\nImplike(munmro)\nRaiseable(roby)\nPremium(roby)\nTrim(roby)\nforall x (Premium(x) -> Atrophic(x))\nforall x (Premium(x) and Atrophic(x) -> Trim(x))\nRaiseable(roby) and Implike(roby) -> Trim(roby)\nforall x (Raiseable(x) and not Atrophic(x) -> Untipped(x))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) -> Untipped(x))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) and Untipped(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Implike(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Implike(x) -> Lidded(x))\n\nTrim(munmro)\n\nforall x (Premium(x) and Atrophic(x) -> Trim(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Esther is persian. Esther is trilateral. Esther is not unlovely. Esther is uric. Coleen is persian. Coleen is unlovely. Coleen is unportable. Nice things are miserable. All unlovely, miserable things are unportable. If Coleen is persian and Coleen is uric then Coleen is unportable. If something is persian and not miserable then it is genotypic. All miserable things are genotypic. If something is miserable and genotypic then it is trilateral. All uric things are trilateral. If something is uric then it is trilateral. Esther is not miserable.", "logic": "\nPersian(esther)\nTrilateral(esther)\nnot Unlovely(esther)\nUric(esther)\nPersian(coleen)\nUnlovely(coleen)\nUnportable(coleen)\nforall x (Unlovely(x) -> Miserable(x))\nforall x (Unlovely(x) and Miserable(x) -> Unportable(x))\nPersian(coleen) and Uric(coleen) -> Unportable(coleen)\nforall x (Persian(x) and not Miserable(x) -> Genotypic(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) -> Genotypic(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) and Genotypic(x) -> Trilateral(x))\nforall x (Uric(x) -> Trilateral(x))\nforall x (Uric(x) -> Trilateral(x))\n\nnot Miserable(esther)\n\nforall x (Unlovely(x) -> Miserable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Tadd is undeceived. Tadd is allargando. Tadd is not mismated. Tadd is tenured. Brooks is undeceived. Brooks is mismated. Brooks is preserved. Nice things are respective. All mismated, respective things are preserved. If Brooks is undeceived and Brooks is tenured then Brooks is preserved. If something is undeceived and not respective then it is scarey. All respective things are scarey. If something is respective and scarey then it is allargando. All tenured things are allargando. If something is tenured then it is allargando. Brooks is tenured.", "logic": "\nUndeceived(tadd)\nAllargando(tadd)\nnot Mismated(tadd)\nTenured(tadd)\nUndeceived(brooks)\nMismated(brooks)\nPreserved(brooks)\nforall x (Mismated(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) and Respective(x) -> Preserved(x))\nUndeceived(brooks) and Tenured(brooks) -> Preserved(brooks)\nforall x (Undeceived(x) and not Respective(x) -> Scarey(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Scarey(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) and Scarey(x) -> Allargando(x))\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Allargando(x))\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Allargando(x))\n\nTenured(brooks)\n\nTenured(brooks) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Nate is continual. Abagael is soulful. Editha is tonsured. If someone is tonsured then they are illicit. All tonsured, illicit people are bowfront. All tonsured, meet people are motherless. If someone is illicit and soulful then they are bowfront. If Editha is motherless and Editha is tonsured then Editha is meet. If someone is bowfront and tonsured then they are meet. If someone is motherless and illicit then they are continual. If someone is motherless then they are continual. Nate is continual.", "logic": "\nContinual(nate)\nSoulful(abagael)\nTonsured(editha)\nforall x (Tonsured(x) -> Illicit(x))\nforall x (Tonsured(x) and Illicit(x) -> Bowfront(x))\nforall x (Tonsured(x) and Meet(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Illicit(x) and Soulful(x) -> Bowfront(x))\nMotherless(editha) and Tonsured(editha) -> Meet(editha)\nforall x (Bowfront(x) and Tonsured(x) -> Meet(x))\nforall x (Motherless(x) and Illicit(x) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Motherless(x) -> Continual(x))\n\nContinual(nate)\n\ntherefore Continual(nate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Katey is squirting. Juan is gregarious. Kellsie is acidotic. If someone is acidotic then they are pouchlike. All acidotic, pouchlike people are attainable. All acidotic, moony people are least. If someone is pouchlike and gregarious then they are attainable. If Kellsie is least and Kellsie is acidotic then Kellsie is moony. If someone is attainable and acidotic then they are moony. If someone is least and pouchlike then they are squirting. If someone is least then they are squirting. Kellsie is not acidotic.", "logic": "\nSquirting(katey)\nGregarious(juan)\nAcidotic(kellsie)\nforall x (Acidotic(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nforall x (Acidotic(x) and Pouchlike(x) -> Attainable(x))\nforall x (Acidotic(x) and Moony(x) -> Least(x))\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) and Gregarious(x) -> Attainable(x))\nLeast(kellsie) and Acidotic(kellsie) -> Moony(kellsie)\nforall x (Attainable(x) and Acidotic(x) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Least(x) and Pouchlike(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Least(x) -> Squirting(x))\n\nnot Acidotic(kellsie)\n\ntherefore Acidotic(kellsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Zack is lentic. Mikael is colonnaded. Rosy is zestful. If someone is zestful then they are talentless. All zestful, talentless people are pathless. All zestful, raising people are mimetic. If someone is talentless and colonnaded then they are pathless. If Rosy is mimetic and Rosy is zestful then Rosy is raising. If someone is pathless and zestful then they are raising. If someone is mimetic and talentless then they are lentic. If someone is mimetic then they are lentic. Rosy is talentless.", "logic": "\nLentic(zack)\nColonnaded(mikael)\nZestful(rosy)\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Talentless(x))\nforall x (Zestful(x) and Talentless(x) -> Pathless(x))\nforall x (Zestful(x) and Raising(x) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Talentless(x) and Colonnaded(x) -> Pathless(x))\nMimetic(rosy) and Zestful(rosy) -> Raising(rosy)\nforall x (Pathless(x) and Zestful(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Mimetic(x) and Talentless(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Mimetic(x) -> Lentic(x))\n\nTalentless(rosy)\n\nZestful(rosy) and forall x (Zestful(x) -> Talentless(x)) -> therefore Talentless(rosy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Rebekkah is grecian. Reggis is roast. Byram is passe. If someone is passe then they are cautious. All passe, cautious people are online. All passe, spectacled people are guided. If someone is cautious and roast then they are online. If Byram is guided and Byram is passe then Byram is spectacled. If someone is online and passe then they are spectacled. If someone is guided and cautious then they are grecian. If someone is guided then they are grecian. Byram is not cautious.", "logic": "\nGrecian(rebekkah)\nRoast(reggis)\nPasse(byram)\nforall x (Passe(x) -> Cautious(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) and Cautious(x) -> Online(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) and Spectacled(x) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Cautious(x) and Roast(x) -> Online(x))\nGuided(byram) and Passe(byram) -> Spectacled(byram)\nforall x (Online(x) and Passe(x) -> Spectacled(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) and Cautious(x) -> Grecian(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Grecian(x))\n\nnot Cautious(byram)\n\nPasse(byram) and forall x (Passe(x) -> Cautious(x)) -> therefore Cautious(byram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Barnebas is manichean. Emily is onshore. Shalom is hipped. If someone is hipped then they are eulogistic. All hipped, eulogistic people are fogbound. All hipped, muciferous people are beery. If someone is eulogistic and onshore then they are fogbound. If Shalom is beery and Shalom is hipped then Shalom is muciferous. If someone is fogbound and hipped then they are muciferous. If someone is beery and eulogistic then they are manichean. If someone is beery then they are manichean. Shalom is fogbound.", "logic": "\nManichean(barnebas)\nOnshore(emily)\nHipped(shalom)\nforall x (Hipped(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\nforall x (Hipped(x) and Eulogistic(x) -> Fogbound(x))\nforall x (Hipped(x) and Muciferous(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) and Onshore(x) -> Fogbound(x))\nBeery(shalom) and Hipped(shalom) -> Muciferous(shalom)\nforall x (Fogbound(x) and Hipped(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) and Eulogistic(x) -> Manichean(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) -> Manichean(x))\n\nFogbound(shalom)\n\nHipped(shalom) and forall x (Hipped(x) -> Eulogistic(x)) -> therefore Eulogistic(shalom) Hipped(shalom) and Eulogistic(shalom) and forall x (Hipped(x) and Eulogistic(x) -> Fogbound(x)) -> therefore Fogbound(shalom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Gwenneth is underage. Gray is germanic. Bjorne is parenteral. If someone is parenteral then they are visceral. All parenteral, visceral people are saleable. All parenteral, outcast people are irish. If someone is visceral and germanic then they are saleable. If Bjorne is irish and Bjorne is parenteral then Bjorne is outcast. If someone is saleable and parenteral then they are outcast. If someone is irish and visceral then they are underage. If someone is irish then they are underage. Bjorne is not saleable.", "logic": "\nUnderage(gwenneth)\nGermanic(gray)\nParenteral(bjorne)\nforall x (Parenteral(x) -> Visceral(x))\nforall x (Parenteral(x) and Visceral(x) -> Saleable(x))\nforall x (Parenteral(x) and Outcast(x) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Visceral(x) and Germanic(x) -> Saleable(x))\nIrish(bjorne) and Parenteral(bjorne) -> Outcast(bjorne)\nforall x (Saleable(x) and Parenteral(x) -> Outcast(x))\nforall x (Irish(x) and Visceral(x) -> Underage(x))\nforall x (Irish(x) -> Underage(x))\n\nnot Saleable(bjorne)\n\nParenteral(bjorne) and forall x (Parenteral(x) -> Visceral(x)) -> therefore Visceral(bjorne) Parenteral(bjorne) and Visceral(bjorne) and forall x (Parenteral(x) and Visceral(x) -> Saleable(x)) -> therefore Saleable(bjorne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Berkeley is naiant. Zelda is leadless. Berry is polynomial. If someone is polynomial then they are staid. All polynomial, staid people are talky. All polynomial, ethnic people are lapidary. If someone is staid and leadless then they are talky. If Berry is lapidary and Berry is polynomial then Berry is ethnic. If someone is talky and polynomial then they are ethnic. If someone is lapidary and staid then they are naiant. If someone is lapidary then they are naiant. Berry is ethnic.", "logic": "\nNaiant(berkeley)\nLeadless(zelda)\nPolynomial(berry)\nforall x (Polynomial(x) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Polynomial(x) and Staid(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Polynomial(x) and Ethnic(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) and Leadless(x) -> Talky(x))\nLapidary(berry) and Polynomial(berry) -> Ethnic(berry)\nforall x (Talky(x) and Polynomial(x) -> Ethnic(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) and Staid(x) -> Naiant(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Naiant(x))\n\nEthnic(berry)\n\nPolynomial(berry) and forall x (Polynomial(x) -> Staid(x)) -> therefore Staid(berry) Polynomial(berry) and Staid(berry) and forall x (Polynomial(x) and Staid(x) -> Talky(x)) -> therefore Talky(berry) Talky(berry) and Polynomial(berry) and forall x (Talky(x) and Polynomial(x) -> Ethnic(x)) -> therefore Ethnic(berry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Giffy is gelid. Archy is fringy. Rube is offending. If someone is offending then they are trivial. All offending, trivial people are zoophagous. All offending, viricidal people are periodic. If someone is trivial and fringy then they are zoophagous. If Rube is periodic and Rube is offending then Rube is viricidal. If someone is zoophagous and offending then they are viricidal. If someone is periodic and trivial then they are gelid. If someone is periodic then they are gelid. Rube is not viricidal.", "logic": "\nGelid(giffy)\nFringy(archy)\nOffending(rube)\nforall x (Offending(x) -> Trivial(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) and Trivial(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) and Viricidal(x) -> Periodic(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Fringy(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\nPeriodic(rube) and Offending(rube) -> Viricidal(rube)\nforall x (Zoophagous(x) and Offending(x) -> Viricidal(x))\nforall x (Periodic(x) and Trivial(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Periodic(x) -> Gelid(x))\n\nnot Viricidal(rube)\n\nOffending(rube) and forall x (Offending(x) -> Trivial(x)) -> therefore Trivial(rube) Offending(rube) and Trivial(rube) and forall x (Offending(x) and Trivial(x) -> Zoophagous(x)) -> therefore Zoophagous(rube) Zoophagous(rube) and Offending(rube) and forall x (Zoophagous(x) and Offending(x) -> Viricidal(x)) -> therefore Viricidal(rube)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Darcey is tortured. Nero is settled. Burgess is tapering. If someone is tapering then they are brainy. All tapering, brainy people are lutheran. All tapering, virile people are fresh. If someone is brainy and settled then they are lutheran. If Burgess is fresh and Burgess is tapering then Burgess is virile. If someone is lutheran and tapering then they are virile. If someone is fresh and brainy then they are tortured. If someone is fresh then they are tortured. Nero is not tortured.", "logic": "\nTortured(darcey)\nSettled(nero)\nTapering(burgess)\nforall x (Tapering(x) -> Brainy(x))\nforall x (Tapering(x) and Brainy(x) -> Lutheran(x))\nforall x (Tapering(x) and Virile(x) -> Fresh(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) and Settled(x) -> Lutheran(x))\nFresh(burgess) and Tapering(burgess) -> Virile(burgess)\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and Tapering(x) -> Virile(x))\nforall x (Fresh(x) and Brainy(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Fresh(x) -> Tortured(x))\n\nnot Tortured(nero)\n\nforall x (Fresh(x) and Brainy(x) -> Tortured(x)) <- forall x (Tapering(x) and Virile(x) -> Fresh(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Baldwin is perennial. Ariel is persuasive. Leeanne is comatose. If someone is comatose then they are hunched. All comatose, hunched people are groomed. All comatose, nocturnal people are sealed. If someone is hunched and persuasive then they are groomed. If Leeanne is sealed and Leeanne is comatose then Leeanne is nocturnal. If someone is groomed and comatose then they are nocturnal. If someone is sealed and hunched then they are perennial. If someone is sealed then they are perennial. Ariel is nocturnal.", "logic": "\nPerennial(baldwin)\nPersuasive(ariel)\nComatose(leeanne)\nforall x (Comatose(x) -> Hunched(x))\nforall x (Comatose(x) and Hunched(x) -> Groomed(x))\nforall x (Comatose(x) and Nocturnal(x) -> Sealed(x))\nforall x (Hunched(x) and Persuasive(x) -> Groomed(x))\nSealed(leeanne) and Comatose(leeanne) -> Nocturnal(leeanne)\nforall x (Groomed(x) and Comatose(x) -> Nocturnal(x))\nforall x (Sealed(x) and Hunched(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Sealed(x) -> Perennial(x))\n\nNocturnal(ariel)\n\nforall x (Groomed(x) and Comatose(x) -> Nocturnal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Aub is boned. Micaela is secluded. Richardo is numerate. If someone is numerate then they are scholastic. All numerate, scholastic people are resistless. All numerate, weighted people are edematous. If someone is scholastic and secluded then they are resistless. If Richardo is edematous and Richardo is numerate then Richardo is weighted. If someone is resistless and numerate then they are weighted. If someone is edematous and scholastic then they are boned. If someone is edematous then they are boned. Micaela is not edematous.", "logic": "\nBoned(aub)\nSecluded(micaela)\nNumerate(richardo)\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Numerate(x) and Scholastic(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Numerate(x) and Weighted(x) -> Edematous(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) and Secluded(x) -> Resistless(x))\nEdematous(richardo) and Numerate(richardo) -> Weighted(richardo)\nforall x (Resistless(x) and Numerate(x) -> Weighted(x))\nforall x (Edematous(x) and Scholastic(x) -> Boned(x))\nforall x (Edematous(x) -> Boned(x))\n\nnot Edematous(micaela)\n\nforall x (Numerate(x) and Weighted(x) -> Edematous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Pandora is edifying. Bren is mint. Katina is ascendable. If someone is ascendable then they are dumbstruck. All ascendable, dumbstruck people are nescient. All ascendable, prognathic people are humanist. If someone is dumbstruck and mint then they are nescient. If Katina is humanist and Katina is ascendable then Katina is prognathic. If someone is nescient and ascendable then they are prognathic. If someone is humanist and dumbstruck then they are edifying. If someone is humanist then they are edifying. Bren is dumbstruck.", "logic": "\nEdifying(pandora)\nMint(bren)\nAscendable(katina)\nforall x (Ascendable(x) -> Dumbstruck(x))\nforall x (Ascendable(x) and Dumbstruck(x) -> Nescient(x))\nforall x (Ascendable(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Humanist(x))\nforall x (Dumbstruck(x) and Mint(x) -> Nescient(x))\nHumanist(katina) and Ascendable(katina) -> Prognathic(katina)\nforall x (Nescient(x) and Ascendable(x) -> Prognathic(x))\nforall x (Humanist(x) and Dumbstruck(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Humanist(x) -> Edifying(x))\n\nDumbstruck(bren)\n\nforall x (Ascendable(x) -> Dumbstruck(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Justina is announced. Darell is aphakic. Lancelot is talentless. If someone is talentless then they are slopped. All talentless, slopped people are sudsy. All talentless, wedged people are palpatory. If someone is slopped and aphakic then they are sudsy. If Lancelot is palpatory and Lancelot is talentless then Lancelot is wedged. If someone is sudsy and talentless then they are wedged. If someone is palpatory and slopped then they are announced. If someone is palpatory then they are announced. Lancelot is not aphakic.", "logic": "\nAnnounced(justina)\nAphakic(darell)\nTalentless(lancelot)\nforall x (Talentless(x) -> Slopped(x))\nforall x (Talentless(x) and Slopped(x) -> Sudsy(x))\nforall x (Talentless(x) and Wedged(x) -> Palpatory(x))\nforall x (Slopped(x) and Aphakic(x) -> Sudsy(x))\nPalpatory(lancelot) and Talentless(lancelot) -> Wedged(lancelot)\nforall x (Sudsy(x) and Talentless(x) -> Wedged(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Slopped(x) -> Announced(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) -> Announced(x))\n\nnot Aphakic(lancelot)\n\nnot Aphakic(lancelot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Zachariah is attested. Xaviera is velvety. Clinton is semisweet. If someone is semisweet then they are bantoid. All semisweet, bantoid people are serrate. All semisweet, isolated people are gross. If someone is bantoid and velvety then they are serrate. If Clinton is gross and Clinton is semisweet then Clinton is isolated. If someone is serrate and semisweet then they are isolated. If someone is gross and bantoid then they are attested. If someone is gross then they are attested. Zachariah is velvety.", "logic": "\nAttested(zachariah)\nVelvety(xaviera)\nSemisweet(clinton)\nforall x (Semisweet(x) -> Bantoid(x))\nforall x (Semisweet(x) and Bantoid(x) -> Serrate(x))\nforall x (Semisweet(x) and Isolated(x) -> Gross(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) and Velvety(x) -> Serrate(x))\nGross(clinton) and Semisweet(clinton) -> Isolated(clinton)\nforall x (Serrate(x) and Semisweet(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) and Bantoid(x) -> Attested(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) -> Attested(x))\n\nVelvety(zachariah)\n\nVelvety(zachariah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Virgina is lumpish. Maia is flimsy. Sawyer is shredded. If someone is shredded then they are shiny. All shredded, shiny people are faultless. All shredded, ended people are deciphered. If someone is shiny and flimsy then they are faultless. If Sawyer is deciphered and Sawyer is shredded then Sawyer is ended. If someone is faultless and shredded then they are ended. If someone is deciphered and shiny then they are lumpish. If someone is deciphered then they are lumpish. Maia is not shredded.", "logic": "\nLumpish(virgina)\nFlimsy(maia)\nShredded(sawyer)\nforall x (Shredded(x) -> Shiny(x))\nforall x (Shredded(x) and Shiny(x) -> Faultless(x))\nforall x (Shredded(x) and Ended(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Shiny(x) and Flimsy(x) -> Faultless(x))\nDeciphered(sawyer) and Shredded(sawyer) -> Ended(sawyer)\nforall x (Faultless(x) and Shredded(x) -> Ended(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Shiny(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) -> Lumpish(x))\n\nnot Shredded(maia)\n\nnot Shredded(maia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Belva is grey. Brodie is pinched. Renault is stunning. If someone is stunning then they are zoonotic. All stunning, zoonotic people are ravaged. All stunning, jewelled people are tomentose. If someone is zoonotic and pinched then they are ravaged. If Renault is tomentose and Renault is stunning then Renault is jewelled. If someone is ravaged and stunning then they are jewelled. If someone is tomentose and zoonotic then they are grey. If someone is tomentose then they are grey. Belva is stunning.", "logic": "\nGrey(belva)\nPinched(brodie)\nStunning(renault)\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Zoonotic(x))\nforall x (Stunning(x) and Zoonotic(x) -> Ravaged(x))\nforall x (Stunning(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Tomentose(x))\nforall x (Zoonotic(x) and Pinched(x) -> Ravaged(x))\nTomentose(renault) and Stunning(renault) -> Jewelled(renault)\nforall x (Ravaged(x) and Stunning(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nforall x (Tomentose(x) and Zoonotic(x) -> Grey(x))\nforall x (Tomentose(x) -> Grey(x))\n\nStunning(belva)\n\nStunning(belva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Redmond is carnal. Redmond is cyanophyte. Redmond is hungry. Corny is carnal. Corny is not cyanophyte. Stevy is not carnal. Stevy is unblushing. Stevy is eightpenny. Stevy is hungry. Mattias is tame. Young, unblushing things are hungry. If something is unblushing then it is sapiential. If something is carnal then it is sapiential. Green things are carnal. Blue things are unblushing. If Stevy is hungry then Stevy is sapiential. All carnal things are eightpenny. If something is carnal and not unblushing then it is eightpenny. Corny is carnal.", "logic": "\nCarnal(redmond)\nCyanophyte(redmond)\nHungry(redmond)\nCarnal(corny)\nnot Cyanophyte(corny)\nnot Carnal(stevy)\nUnblushing(stevy)\nEightpenny(stevy)\nHungry(stevy)\nTame(mattias)\nforall x (Sapiential(x) and Unblushing(x) -> Hungry(x))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) -> Sapiential(x))\nforall x (Carnal(x) -> Sapiential(x))\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Carnal(x))\nforall x (Carnal(x) -> Unblushing(x))\nHungry(stevy) -> Sapiential(stevy)\nforall x (Carnal(x) -> Eightpenny(x))\nforall x (Carnal(x) and not Unblushing(x) -> Eightpenny(x))\n\nCarnal(corny)\n\ntherefore Carnal(corny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Roxanna is fictile. Roxanna is navigable. Roxanna is inducive. Idelle is fictile. Idelle is not navigable. Crystal is not fictile. Crystal is uncial. Crystal is pathetic. Crystal is inducive. Harriot is miserly. Young, uncial things are inducive. If something is uncial then it is copesetic. If something is fictile then it is copesetic. Green things are fictile. Blue things are uncial. If Crystal is inducive then Crystal is copesetic. All fictile things are pathetic. If something is fictile and not uncial then it is pathetic. Crystal is not uncial.", "logic": "\nFictile(roxanna)\nNavigable(roxanna)\nInducive(roxanna)\nFictile(idelle)\nnot Navigable(idelle)\nnot Fictile(crystal)\nUncial(crystal)\nPathetic(crystal)\nInducive(crystal)\nMiserly(harriot)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and Uncial(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Uncial(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (Miserly(x) -> Fictile(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Uncial(x))\nInducive(crystal) -> Copesetic(crystal)\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Pathetic(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) and not Uncial(x) -> Pathetic(x))\n\nnot Uncial(crystal)\n\ntherefore Uncial(crystal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Giffer is iconic. Giffer is epilithic. Giffer is parthian. Cyril is iconic. Cyril is not epilithic. Pavel is not iconic. Pavel is calvinist. Pavel is pathless. Pavel is parthian. Faunie is jewelled. Young, calvinist things are parthian. If something is calvinist then it is routine. If something is iconic then it is routine. Green things are iconic. Blue things are calvinist. If Pavel is parthian then Pavel is routine. All iconic things are pathless. If something is iconic and not calvinist then it is pathless. Pavel is routine.", "logic": "\nIconic(giffer)\nEpilithic(giffer)\nParthian(giffer)\nIconic(cyril)\nnot Epilithic(cyril)\nnot Iconic(pavel)\nCalvinist(pavel)\nPathless(pavel)\nParthian(pavel)\nJewelled(faunie)\nforall x (Routine(x) and Calvinist(x) -> Parthian(x))\nforall x (Calvinist(x) -> Routine(x))\nforall x (Iconic(x) -> Routine(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Iconic(x))\nforall x (Iconic(x) -> Calvinist(x))\nParthian(pavel) -> Routine(pavel)\nforall x (Iconic(x) -> Pathless(x))\nforall x (Iconic(x) and not Calvinist(x) -> Pathless(x))\n\nRoutine(pavel)\n\nCalvinist(pavel) and forall x (Calvinist(x) -> Routine(x)) -> therefore Routine(pavel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Allan is poisonous. Allan is monoclinic. Allan is selected. Vinny is poisonous. Vinny is not monoclinic. Inigo is not poisonous. Inigo is bashful. Inigo is tensional. Inigo is selected. Eulalie is faceless. Young, bashful things are selected. If something is bashful then it is soppy. If something is poisonous then it is soppy. Green things are poisonous. Blue things are bashful. If Inigo is selected then Inigo is soppy. All poisonous things are tensional. If something is poisonous and not bashful then it is tensional. Allan is not bashful.", "logic": "\nPoisonous(allan)\nMonoclinic(allan)\nSelected(allan)\nPoisonous(vinny)\nnot Monoclinic(vinny)\nnot Poisonous(inigo)\nBashful(inigo)\nTensional(inigo)\nSelected(inigo)\nFaceless(eulalie)\nforall x (Soppy(x) and Bashful(x) -> Selected(x))\nforall x (Bashful(x) -> Soppy(x))\nforall x (Poisonous(x) -> Soppy(x))\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Poisonous(x))\nforall x (Poisonous(x) -> Bashful(x))\nSelected(inigo) -> Soppy(inigo)\nforall x (Poisonous(x) -> Tensional(x))\nforall x (Poisonous(x) and not Bashful(x) -> Tensional(x))\n\nnot Bashful(allan)\n\nPoisonous(allan) and forall x (Poisonous(x) -> Bashful(x)) -> therefore Bashful(allan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Helsa is comestible. Helsa is indexical. Helsa is monosemous. Eada is comestible. Eada is not indexical. Adriana is not comestible. Adriana is bronzy. Adriana is tiddly. Adriana is monosemous. Lori is sepulchral. Young, bronzy things are monosemous. If something is bronzy then it is designing. If something is comestible then it is designing. Green things are comestible. Blue things are bronzy. If Adriana is monosemous then Adriana is designing. All comestible things are tiddly. If something is comestible and not bronzy then it is tiddly. Eada is monosemous.", "logic": "\nComestible(helsa)\nIndexical(helsa)\nMonosemous(helsa)\nComestible(eada)\nnot Indexical(eada)\nnot Comestible(adriana)\nBronzy(adriana)\nTiddly(adriana)\nMonosemous(adriana)\nSepulchral(lori)\nforall x (Designing(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Monosemous(x))\nforall x (Bronzy(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nMonosemous(adriana) -> Designing(adriana)\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) and not Bronzy(x) -> Tiddly(x))\n\nMonosemous(eada)\n\nComestible(eada) and forall x (Comestible(x) -> Designing(x)) -> therefore Designing(eada) Comestible(eada) and forall x (Comestible(x) -> Bronzy(x)) -> therefore Bronzy(eada) Designing(eada) and Bronzy(eada) and forall x (Designing(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Monosemous(x)) -> therefore Monosemous(eada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Devon is extrusive. Devon is apomictic. Devon is motorised. Alfred is extrusive. Alfred is not apomictic. Arnoldo is not extrusive. Arnoldo is gaping. Arnoldo is ultrasonic. Arnoldo is motorised. Mollie is unoriented. Young, gaping things are motorised. If something is gaping then it is hellenic. If something is extrusive then it is hellenic. Green things are extrusive. Blue things are gaping. If Arnoldo is motorised then Arnoldo is hellenic. All extrusive things are ultrasonic. If something is extrusive and not gaping then it is ultrasonic. Mollie is not hellenic.", "logic": "\nExtrusive(devon)\nApomictic(devon)\nMotorised(devon)\nExtrusive(alfred)\nnot Apomictic(alfred)\nnot Extrusive(arnoldo)\nGaping(arnoldo)\nUltrasonic(arnoldo)\nMotorised(arnoldo)\nUnoriented(mollie)\nforall x (Hellenic(x) and Gaping(x) -> Motorised(x))\nforall x (Gaping(x) -> Hellenic(x))\nforall x (Extrusive(x) -> Hellenic(x))\nforall x (Unoriented(x) -> Extrusive(x))\nforall x (Extrusive(x) -> Gaping(x))\nMotorised(arnoldo) -> Hellenic(arnoldo)\nforall x (Extrusive(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\nforall x (Extrusive(x) and not Gaping(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\n\nnot Hellenic(mollie)\n\nUnoriented(mollie) and forall x (Unoriented(x) -> Extrusive(x)) -> therefore Extrusive(mollie) Extrusive(mollie) and forall x (Extrusive(x) -> Hellenic(x)) -> therefore Hellenic(mollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Zeb is evaporable. Zeb is acetylic. Zeb is trembling. Merry is evaporable. Merry is not acetylic. Aurie is not evaporable. Aurie is clinquant. Aurie is provincial. Aurie is trembling. Melvyn is huddled. Young, clinquant things are trembling. If something is clinquant then it is naif. If something is evaporable then it is naif. Green things are evaporable. Blue things are clinquant. If Aurie is trembling then Aurie is naif. All evaporable things are provincial. If something is evaporable and not clinquant then it is provincial. Melvyn is trembling.", "logic": "\nEvaporable(zeb)\nAcetylic(zeb)\nTrembling(zeb)\nEvaporable(merry)\nnot Acetylic(merry)\nnot Evaporable(aurie)\nClinquant(aurie)\nProvincial(aurie)\nTrembling(aurie)\nHuddled(melvyn)\nforall x (Naif(x) and Clinquant(x) -> Trembling(x))\nforall x (Clinquant(x) -> Naif(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) -> Naif(x))\nforall x (Huddled(x) -> Evaporable(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) -> Clinquant(x))\nTrembling(aurie) -> Naif(aurie)\nforall x (Evaporable(x) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) and not Clinquant(x) -> Provincial(x))\n\nTrembling(melvyn)\n\nHuddled(melvyn) and forall x (Huddled(x) -> Evaporable(x)) -> therefore Evaporable(melvyn) Evaporable(melvyn) and forall x (Evaporable(x) -> Naif(x)) -> therefore Naif(melvyn) Huddled(melvyn) and forall x (Huddled(x) -> Evaporable(x)) -> therefore Evaporable(melvyn) Evaporable(melvyn) and forall x (Evaporable(x) -> Clinquant(x)) -> therefore Clinquant(melvyn) Naif(melvyn) and Clinquant(melvyn) and forall x (Naif(x) and Clinquant(x) -> Trembling(x)) -> therefore Trembling(melvyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Rodge is keyed. Rodge is civic. Rodge is celluloid. Bridgett is keyed. Bridgett is not civic. Adelle is not keyed. Adelle is chordal. Adelle is uricosuric. Adelle is celluloid. Ronny is xxxv. Young, chordal things are celluloid. If something is chordal then it is lendable. If something is keyed then it is lendable. Green things are keyed. Blue things are chordal. If Adelle is celluloid then Adelle is lendable. All keyed things are uricosuric. If something is keyed and not chordal then it is uricosuric. Ronny is not celluloid.", "logic": "\nKeyed(rodge)\nCivic(rodge)\nCelluloid(rodge)\nKeyed(bridgett)\nnot Civic(bridgett)\nnot Keyed(adelle)\nChordal(adelle)\nUricosuric(adelle)\nCelluloid(adelle)\nXxxv(ronny)\nforall x (Lendable(x) and Chordal(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> Lendable(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Lendable(x))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) -> Keyed(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Chordal(x))\nCelluloid(adelle) -> Lendable(adelle)\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) and not Chordal(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\n\nnot Celluloid(ronny)\n\nXxxv(ronny) and forall x (Xxxv(x) -> Keyed(x)) -> therefore Keyed(ronny) Keyed(ronny) and forall x (Keyed(x) -> Lendable(x)) -> therefore Lendable(ronny) Xxxv(ronny) and forall x (Xxxv(x) -> Keyed(x)) -> therefore Keyed(ronny) Keyed(ronny) and forall x (Keyed(x) -> Chordal(x)) -> therefore Chordal(ronny) Lendable(ronny) and Chordal(ronny) and forall x (Lendable(x) and Chordal(x) -> Celluloid(x)) -> therefore Celluloid(ronny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Sayre is excusatory. Sayre is glycogenic. Sayre is spacious. Ingelbert is excusatory. Ingelbert is not glycogenic. Noemi is not excusatory. Noemi is stringy. Noemi is apractic. Noemi is spacious. Valina is outer. Young, stringy things are spacious. If something is stringy then it is abreast. If something is excusatory then it is abreast. Green things are excusatory. Blue things are stringy. If Noemi is spacious then Noemi is abreast. All excusatory things are apractic. If something is excusatory and not stringy then it is apractic. Ingelbert is not outer.", "logic": "\nExcusatory(sayre)\nGlycogenic(sayre)\nSpacious(sayre)\nExcusatory(ingelbert)\nnot Glycogenic(ingelbert)\nnot Excusatory(noemi)\nStringy(noemi)\nApractic(noemi)\nSpacious(noemi)\nOuter(valina)\nforall x (Abreast(x) and Stringy(x) -> Spacious(x))\nforall x (Stringy(x) -> Abreast(x))\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Abreast(x))\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Stringy(x))\nSpacious(noemi) -> Abreast(noemi)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Apractic(x))\nforall x (Excusatory(x) and not Stringy(x) -> Apractic(x))\n\nnot Outer(ingelbert)\n\nnot Outer(ingelbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Travis is soft. Travis is headfirst. Travis is gibelike. Lonny is soft. Lonny is not headfirst. Duncan is not soft. Duncan is sweptback. Duncan is redolent. Duncan is gibelike. Ferdy is nubbly. Young, sweptback things are gibelike. If something is sweptback then it is bedridden. If something is soft then it is bedridden. Green things are soft. Blue things are sweptback. If Duncan is gibelike then Duncan is bedridden. All soft things are redolent. If something is soft and not sweptback then it is redolent. Duncan is nubbly.", "logic": "\nSoft(travis)\nHeadfirst(travis)\nGibelike(travis)\nSoft(lonny)\nnot Headfirst(lonny)\nnot Soft(duncan)\nSweptback(duncan)\nRedolent(duncan)\nGibelike(duncan)\nNubbly(ferdy)\nforall x (Bedridden(x) and Sweptback(x) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) -> Bedridden(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Bedridden(x))\nforall x (Nubbly(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Sweptback(x))\nGibelike(duncan) -> Bedridden(duncan)\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) and not Sweptback(x) -> Redolent(x))\n\nNubbly(duncan)\n\nNubbly(duncan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Udale is ebon. Udale is momentary. Udale is saved. Steffie is ebon. Steffie is not momentary. Wang is not ebon. Wang is unkept. Wang is wilsonian. Wang is saved. Titus is laotian. Young, unkept things are saved. If something is unkept then it is unpeaceful. If something is ebon then it is unpeaceful. Green things are ebon. Blue things are unkept. If Wang is saved then Wang is unpeaceful. All ebon things are wilsonian. If something is ebon and not unkept then it is wilsonian. Titus is not momentary.", "logic": "\nEbon(udale)\nMomentary(udale)\nSaved(udale)\nEbon(steffie)\nnot Momentary(steffie)\nnot Ebon(wang)\nUnkept(wang)\nWilsonian(wang)\nSaved(wang)\nLaotian(titus)\nforall x (Unpeaceful(x) and Unkept(x) -> Saved(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Unpeaceful(x))\nforall x (Ebon(x) -> Unpeaceful(x))\nforall x (Laotian(x) -> Ebon(x))\nforall x (Ebon(x) -> Unkept(x))\nSaved(wang) -> Unpeaceful(wang)\nforall x (Ebon(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\nforall x (Ebon(x) and not Unkept(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\n\nnot Momentary(titus)\n\nnot Momentary(titus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Skip is peregrine. Skip is famed. Skip is turkmen. Aggi is peregrine. Aggi is not famed. Cheryl is not peregrine. Cheryl is untempting. Cheryl is azoic. Cheryl is turkmen. Sullivan is potbound. Young, untempting things are turkmen. If something is untempting then it is diplomatic. If something is peregrine then it is diplomatic. Green things are peregrine. Blue things are untempting. If Cheryl is turkmen then Cheryl is diplomatic. All peregrine things are azoic. If something is peregrine and not untempting then it is azoic. Skip is potbound.", "logic": "\nPeregrine(skip)\nFamed(skip)\nTurkmen(skip)\nPeregrine(aggi)\nnot Famed(aggi)\nnot Peregrine(cheryl)\nUntempting(cheryl)\nAzoic(cheryl)\nTurkmen(cheryl)\nPotbound(sullivan)\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) and Untempting(x) -> Turkmen(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> Diplomatic(x))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Diplomatic(x))\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> Peregrine(x))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Untempting(x))\nTurkmen(cheryl) -> Diplomatic(cheryl)\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Azoic(x))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) and not Untempting(x) -> Azoic(x))\n\nPotbound(skip)\n\nPotbound(skip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Sandi is wartlike. Sandi is palliative. Sandi is not bigamous. Sandi is pulmonic. Melamie is blinded. Rosabelle is wartlike. Rosabelle is bigamous. Rosabelle is pungent. Erhart is wartlike. Erhart is palliative. Erhart is not bigamous. Erhart is pungent. Green people are not pungent. If Melamie is pungent then Melamie is palliative. If Rosabelle is blinded then Rosabelle is pulmonic. If Melamie is not pungent then Melamie is adaxial. If someone is pungent and not pulmonic then they are wartlike. Smart people are wartlike. Rosabelle is pungent.", "logic": "\nWartlike(sandi)\nPalliative(sandi)\nnot Bigamous(sandi)\nPulmonic(sandi)\nBlinded(melamie)\nWartlike(rosabelle)\nBigamous(rosabelle)\nPungent(rosabelle)\nWartlike(erhart)\nPalliative(erhart)\nnot Bigamous(erhart)\nPungent(erhart)\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> not Pungent(x))\nPungent(melamie) -> Palliative(melamie)\nBlinded(rosabelle) -> Pulmonic(rosabelle)\nnot Pungent(melamie) -> Adaxial(melamie)\nforall x (Pungent(x) and not Pulmonic(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Adaxial(x) -> Wartlike(x))\n\nPungent(rosabelle)\n\ntherefore Pungent(rosabelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Willdon is boughless. Willdon is unseen. Willdon is not leering. Willdon is lento. Mady is earthbound. Blanch is boughless. Blanch is leering. Blanch is urgent. Shelby is boughless. Shelby is unseen. Shelby is not leering. Shelby is urgent. Green people are not urgent. If Mady is urgent then Mady is unseen. If Blanch is earthbound then Blanch is lento. If Mady is not urgent then Mady is rightist. If someone is urgent and not lento then they are boughless. Smart people are boughless. Shelby is leering.", "logic": "\nBoughless(willdon)\nUnseen(willdon)\nnot Leering(willdon)\nLento(willdon)\nEarthbound(mady)\nBoughless(blanch)\nLeering(blanch)\nUrgent(blanch)\nBoughless(shelby)\nUnseen(shelby)\nnot Leering(shelby)\nUrgent(shelby)\nforall x (Earthbound(x) -> not Urgent(x))\nUrgent(mady) -> Unseen(mady)\nEarthbound(blanch) -> Lento(blanch)\nnot Urgent(mady) -> Rightist(mady)\nforall x (Urgent(x) and not Lento(x) -> Boughless(x))\nforall x (Rightist(x) -> Boughless(x))\n\nLeering(shelby)\n\ntherefore not Leering(shelby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Stafani is cereal. Stafani is fossilized. Stafani is not sacerdotal. Stafani is voltarian. Elane is lxvii. Delcine is cereal. Delcine is sacerdotal. Delcine is gargantuan. Corrie is cereal. Corrie is fossilized. Corrie is not sacerdotal. Corrie is gargantuan. Green people are not gargantuan. If Elane is gargantuan then Elane is fossilized. If Delcine is lxvii then Delcine is voltarian. If Elane is not gargantuan then Elane is tonguelike. If someone is gargantuan and not voltarian then they are cereal. Smart people are cereal. Elane is not gargantuan.", "logic": "\nCereal(stafani)\nFossilized(stafani)\nnot Sacerdotal(stafani)\nVoltarian(stafani)\nLxvii(elane)\nCereal(delcine)\nSacerdotal(delcine)\nGargantuan(delcine)\nCereal(corrie)\nFossilized(corrie)\nnot Sacerdotal(corrie)\nGargantuan(corrie)\nforall x (Lxvii(x) -> not Gargantuan(x))\nGargantuan(elane) -> Fossilized(elane)\nLxvii(delcine) -> Voltarian(delcine)\nnot Gargantuan(elane) -> Tonguelike(elane)\nforall x (Gargantuan(x) and not Voltarian(x) -> Cereal(x))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Cereal(x))\n\nnot Gargantuan(elane)\n\nLxvii(elane) and forall x (Lxvii(x) -> not Gargantuan(x)) -> therefore not Gargantuan(elane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Maribeth is warning. Maribeth is mannish. Maribeth is not bistroic. Maribeth is pantheist. Alla is dickensian. Zilvia is warning. Zilvia is bistroic. Zilvia is nonsweet. Tella is warning. Tella is mannish. Tella is not bistroic. Tella is nonsweet. Green people are not nonsweet. If Alla is nonsweet then Alla is mannish. If Zilvia is dickensian then Zilvia is pantheist. If Alla is not nonsweet then Alla is tricolor. If someone is nonsweet and not pantheist then they are warning. Smart people are warning. Alla is nonsweet.", "logic": "\nWarning(maribeth)\nMannish(maribeth)\nnot Bistroic(maribeth)\nPantheist(maribeth)\nDickensian(alla)\nWarning(zilvia)\nBistroic(zilvia)\nNonsweet(zilvia)\nWarning(tella)\nMannish(tella)\nnot Bistroic(tella)\nNonsweet(tella)\nforall x (Dickensian(x) -> not Nonsweet(x))\nNonsweet(alla) -> Mannish(alla)\nDickensian(zilvia) -> Pantheist(zilvia)\nnot Nonsweet(alla) -> Tricolor(alla)\nforall x (Nonsweet(x) and not Pantheist(x) -> Warning(x))\nforall x (Tricolor(x) -> Warning(x))\n\nNonsweet(alla)\n\nDickensian(alla) and forall x (Dickensian(x) -> not Nonsweet(x)) -> therefore not Nonsweet(alla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Rafaelita is revolved. Rafaelita is sacred. Rafaelita is not bromidic. Rafaelita is sunstruck. Kally is amerind. Roy is revolved. Roy is bromidic. Roy is steady. Meyer is revolved. Meyer is sacred. Meyer is not bromidic. Meyer is steady. Green people are not steady. If Kally is steady then Kally is sacred. If Roy is amerind then Roy is sunstruck. If Kally is not steady then Kally is anhydrous. If someone is steady and not sunstruck then they are revolved. Smart people are revolved. Kally is anhydrous.", "logic": "\nRevolved(rafaelita)\nSacred(rafaelita)\nnot Bromidic(rafaelita)\nSunstruck(rafaelita)\nAmerind(kally)\nRevolved(roy)\nBromidic(roy)\nSteady(roy)\nRevolved(meyer)\nSacred(meyer)\nnot Bromidic(meyer)\nSteady(meyer)\nforall x (Amerind(x) -> not Steady(x))\nSteady(kally) -> Sacred(kally)\nAmerind(roy) -> Sunstruck(roy)\nnot Steady(kally) -> Anhydrous(kally)\nforall x (Steady(x) and not Sunstruck(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Anhydrous(x) -> Revolved(x))\n\nAnhydrous(kally)\n\nAmerind(kally) and forall x (Amerind(x) -> not Steady(x)) -> therefore not Steady(kally) not Steady(kally) and not Steady(kally) -> Anhydrous(kally) -> therefore Anhydrous(kally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Filippa is mated. Filippa is outlying. Filippa is not longtime. Filippa is cuspidal. Carmelle is intimate. Viki is mated. Viki is longtime. Viki is unheeded. Roch is mated. Roch is outlying. Roch is not longtime. Roch is unheeded. Green people are not unheeded. If Carmelle is unheeded then Carmelle is outlying. If Viki is intimate then Viki is cuspidal. If Carmelle is not unheeded then Carmelle is australian. If someone is unheeded and not cuspidal then they are mated. Smart people are mated. Carmelle is not australian.", "logic": "\nMated(filippa)\nOutlying(filippa)\nnot Longtime(filippa)\nCuspidal(filippa)\nIntimate(carmelle)\nMated(viki)\nLongtime(viki)\nUnheeded(viki)\nMated(roch)\nOutlying(roch)\nnot Longtime(roch)\nUnheeded(roch)\nforall x (Intimate(x) -> not Unheeded(x))\nUnheeded(carmelle) -> Outlying(carmelle)\nIntimate(viki) -> Cuspidal(viki)\nnot Unheeded(carmelle) -> Australian(carmelle)\nforall x (Unheeded(x) and not Cuspidal(x) -> Mated(x))\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Mated(x))\n\nnot Australian(carmelle)\n\nIntimate(carmelle) and forall x (Intimate(x) -> not Unheeded(x)) -> therefore not Unheeded(carmelle) not Unheeded(carmelle) and not Unheeded(carmelle) -> Australian(carmelle) -> therefore Australian(carmelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Joannes is hideous. Joannes is defunct. Joannes is not catoptric. Joannes is spinal. Cristine is teary. Tilly is hideous. Tilly is catoptric. Tilly is fabled. Julietta is hideous. Julietta is defunct. Julietta is not catoptric. Julietta is fabled. Green people are not fabled. If Cristine is fabled then Cristine is defunct. If Tilly is teary then Tilly is spinal. If Cristine is not fabled then Cristine is crownless. If someone is fabled and not spinal then they are hideous. Smart people are hideous. Cristine is hideous.", "logic": "\nHideous(joannes)\nDefunct(joannes)\nnot Catoptric(joannes)\nSpinal(joannes)\nTeary(cristine)\nHideous(tilly)\nCatoptric(tilly)\nFabled(tilly)\nHideous(julietta)\nDefunct(julietta)\nnot Catoptric(julietta)\nFabled(julietta)\nforall x (Teary(x) -> not Fabled(x))\nFabled(cristine) -> Defunct(cristine)\nTeary(tilly) -> Spinal(tilly)\nnot Fabled(cristine) -> Crownless(cristine)\nforall x (Fabled(x) and not Spinal(x) -> Hideous(x))\nforall x (Crownless(x) -> Hideous(x))\n\nHideous(cristine)\n\nTeary(cristine) and forall x (Teary(x) -> not Fabled(x)) -> therefore not Fabled(cristine) not Fabled(cristine) and not Fabled(cristine) -> Crownless(cristine) -> therefore Crownless(cristine) Crownless(cristine) and forall x (Crownless(x) -> Hideous(x)) -> therefore Hideous(cristine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Wendel is acetylenic. Wendel is hexagonal. Wendel is not merited. Wendel is keyless. Charmian is lxxiii. Adeline is acetylenic. Adeline is merited. Adeline is truculent. Dasi is acetylenic. Dasi is hexagonal. Dasi is not merited. Dasi is truculent. Green people are not truculent. If Charmian is truculent then Charmian is hexagonal. If Adeline is lxxiii then Adeline is keyless. If Charmian is not truculent then Charmian is indirect. If someone is truculent and not keyless then they are acetylenic. Smart people are acetylenic. Charmian is not acetylenic.", "logic": "\nAcetylenic(wendel)\nHexagonal(wendel)\nnot Merited(wendel)\nKeyless(wendel)\nLxxiii(charmian)\nAcetylenic(adeline)\nMerited(adeline)\nTruculent(adeline)\nAcetylenic(dasi)\nHexagonal(dasi)\nnot Merited(dasi)\nTruculent(dasi)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> not Truculent(x))\nTruculent(charmian) -> Hexagonal(charmian)\nLxxiii(adeline) -> Keyless(adeline)\nnot Truculent(charmian) -> Indirect(charmian)\nforall x (Truculent(x) and not Keyless(x) -> Acetylenic(x))\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> Acetylenic(x))\n\nnot Acetylenic(charmian)\n\nLxxiii(charmian) and forall x (Lxxiii(x) -> not Truculent(x)) -> therefore not Truculent(charmian) not Truculent(charmian) and not Truculent(charmian) -> Indirect(charmian) -> therefore Indirect(charmian) Indirect(charmian) and forall x (Indirect(x) -> Acetylenic(x)) -> therefore Acetylenic(charmian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Devondra is palmar. Devondra is abridged. Devondra is not chromatic. Devondra is lusterless. Marlene is awninged. Goldina is palmar. Goldina is chromatic. Goldina is ebracteate. Rey is palmar. Rey is abridged. Rey is not chromatic. Rey is ebracteate. Green people are not ebracteate. If Marlene is ebracteate then Marlene is abridged. If Goldina is awninged then Goldina is lusterless. If Marlene is not ebracteate then Marlene is abashed. If someone is ebracteate and not lusterless then they are palmar. Smart people are palmar. Marlene is not abridged.", "logic": "\nPalmar(devondra)\nAbridged(devondra)\nnot Chromatic(devondra)\nLusterless(devondra)\nAwninged(marlene)\nPalmar(goldina)\nChromatic(goldina)\nEbracteate(goldina)\nPalmar(rey)\nAbridged(rey)\nnot Chromatic(rey)\nEbracteate(rey)\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> not Ebracteate(x))\nEbracteate(marlene) -> Abridged(marlene)\nAwninged(goldina) -> Lusterless(goldina)\nnot Ebracteate(marlene) -> Abashed(marlene)\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) and not Lusterless(x) -> Palmar(x))\nforall x (Abashed(x) -> Palmar(x))\n\nnot Abridged(marlene)\n\nEbracteate(marlene) -> Abridged(marlene) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Rozanne is conveyable. Rozanne is sure. Rozanne is not enate. Rozanne is sulky. Tiffany is wise. Krystalle is conveyable. Krystalle is enate. Krystalle is meritless. Xavier is conveyable. Xavier is sure. Xavier is not enate. Xavier is meritless. Green people are not meritless. If Tiffany is meritless then Tiffany is sure. If Krystalle is wise then Krystalle is sulky. If Tiffany is not meritless then Tiffany is wrongful. If someone is meritless and not sulky then they are conveyable. Smart people are conveyable. Krystalle is sulky.", "logic": "\nConveyable(rozanne)\nSure(rozanne)\nnot Enate(rozanne)\nSulky(rozanne)\nWise(tiffany)\nConveyable(krystalle)\nEnate(krystalle)\nMeritless(krystalle)\nConveyable(xavier)\nSure(xavier)\nnot Enate(xavier)\nMeritless(xavier)\nforall x (Wise(x) -> not Meritless(x))\nMeritless(tiffany) -> Sure(tiffany)\nWise(krystalle) -> Sulky(krystalle)\nnot Meritless(tiffany) -> Wrongful(tiffany)\nforall x (Meritless(x) and not Sulky(x) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Wrongful(x) -> Conveyable(x))\n\nSulky(krystalle)\n\nWise(krystalle) -> Sulky(krystalle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Manuel is adept. Manuel is quantized. Manuel is not viewless. Manuel is absorbing. Kingsly is agelong. Uri is adept. Uri is viewless. Uri is iodized. Lilyan is adept. Lilyan is quantized. Lilyan is not viewless. Lilyan is iodized. Green people are not iodized. If Kingsly is iodized then Kingsly is quantized. If Uri is agelong then Uri is absorbing. If Kingsly is not iodized then Kingsly is grouchy. If someone is iodized and not absorbing then they are adept. Smart people are adept. Lilyan is not agelong.", "logic": "\nAdept(manuel)\nQuantized(manuel)\nnot Viewless(manuel)\nAbsorbing(manuel)\nAgelong(kingsly)\nAdept(uri)\nViewless(uri)\nIodized(uri)\nAdept(lilyan)\nQuantized(lilyan)\nnot Viewless(lilyan)\nIodized(lilyan)\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> not Iodized(x))\nIodized(kingsly) -> Quantized(kingsly)\nAgelong(uri) -> Absorbing(uri)\nnot Iodized(kingsly) -> Grouchy(kingsly)\nforall x (Iodized(x) and not Absorbing(x) -> Adept(x))\nforall x (Grouchy(x) -> Adept(x))\n\nnot Agelong(lilyan)\n\nnot Agelong(lilyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Adolph is artistic. Adolph is queer. Adolph is not starboard. Adolph is chimeral. Roobbie is spatial. Janelle is artistic. Janelle is starboard. Janelle is monacan. Harrold is artistic. Harrold is queer. Harrold is not starboard. Harrold is monacan. Green people are not monacan. If Roobbie is monacan then Roobbie is queer. If Janelle is spatial then Janelle is chimeral. If Roobbie is not monacan then Roobbie is cliched. If someone is monacan and not chimeral then they are artistic. Smart people are artistic. Roobbie is starboard.", "logic": "\nArtistic(adolph)\nQueer(adolph)\nnot Starboard(adolph)\nChimeral(adolph)\nSpatial(roobbie)\nArtistic(janelle)\nStarboard(janelle)\nMonacan(janelle)\nArtistic(harrold)\nQueer(harrold)\nnot Starboard(harrold)\nMonacan(harrold)\nforall x (Spatial(x) -> not Monacan(x))\nMonacan(roobbie) -> Queer(roobbie)\nSpatial(janelle) -> Chimeral(janelle)\nnot Monacan(roobbie) -> Cliched(roobbie)\nforall x (Monacan(x) and not Chimeral(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Artistic(x))\n\nStarboard(roobbie)\n\nStarboard(roobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Faunie is renewing. Faunie is acidulent. Faunie is not expert. Faunie is gaga. Grazia is warning. Winnifred is renewing. Winnifred is expert. Winnifred is vehement. Biff is renewing. Biff is acidulent. Biff is not expert. Biff is vehement. Green people are not vehement. If Grazia is vehement then Grazia is acidulent. If Winnifred is warning then Winnifred is gaga. If Grazia is not vehement then Grazia is primary. If someone is vehement and not gaga then they are renewing. Smart people are renewing. Biff is not primary.", "logic": "\nRenewing(faunie)\nAcidulent(faunie)\nnot Expert(faunie)\nGaga(faunie)\nWarning(grazia)\nRenewing(winnifred)\nExpert(winnifred)\nVehement(winnifred)\nRenewing(biff)\nAcidulent(biff)\nnot Expert(biff)\nVehement(biff)\nforall x (Warning(x) -> not Vehement(x))\nVehement(grazia) -> Acidulent(grazia)\nWarning(winnifred) -> Gaga(winnifred)\nnot Vehement(grazia) -> Primary(grazia)\nforall x (Vehement(x) and not Gaga(x) -> Renewing(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Renewing(x))\n\nnot Primary(biff)\n\nnot Primary(biff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Jakob is photogenic. Jakob is napping. Jakob is not burbly. Jakob is austere. Corinna is eleven. Lauren is photogenic. Lauren is burbly. Lauren is emotive. Cacilie is photogenic. Cacilie is napping. Cacilie is not burbly. Cacilie is emotive. Green people are not emotive. If Corinna is emotive then Corinna is napping. If Lauren is eleven then Lauren is austere. If Corinna is not emotive then Corinna is headless. If someone is emotive and not austere then they are photogenic. Smart people are photogenic. Jakob is headless.", "logic": "\nPhotogenic(jakob)\nNapping(jakob)\nnot Burbly(jakob)\nAustere(jakob)\nEleven(corinna)\nPhotogenic(lauren)\nBurbly(lauren)\nEmotive(lauren)\nPhotogenic(cacilie)\nNapping(cacilie)\nnot Burbly(cacilie)\nEmotive(cacilie)\nforall x (Eleven(x) -> not Emotive(x))\nEmotive(corinna) -> Napping(corinna)\nEleven(lauren) -> Austere(lauren)\nnot Emotive(corinna) -> Headless(corinna)\nforall x (Emotive(x) and not Austere(x) -> Photogenic(x))\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Photogenic(x))\n\nHeadless(jakob)\n\nHeadless(jakob) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Mercie is experient. Mercie is cherty. Mercie is not concise. Mercie is blowy. Alysia is contracted. Jessie is experient. Jessie is concise. Jessie is veracious. Swen is experient. Swen is cherty. Swen is not concise. Swen is veracious. Green people are not veracious. If Alysia is veracious then Alysia is cherty. If Jessie is contracted then Jessie is blowy. If Alysia is not veracious then Alysia is pursy. If someone is veracious and not blowy then they are experient. Smart people are experient. Alysia is not blowy.", "logic": "\nExperient(mercie)\nCherty(mercie)\nnot Concise(mercie)\nBlowy(mercie)\nContracted(alysia)\nExperient(jessie)\nConcise(jessie)\nVeracious(jessie)\nExperient(swen)\nCherty(swen)\nnot Concise(swen)\nVeracious(swen)\nforall x (Contracted(x) -> not Veracious(x))\nVeracious(alysia) -> Cherty(alysia)\nContracted(jessie) -> Blowy(jessie)\nnot Veracious(alysia) -> Pursy(alysia)\nforall x (Veracious(x) and not Blowy(x) -> Experient(x))\nforall x (Pursy(x) -> Experient(x))\n\nnot Blowy(alysia)\n\nnot Blowy(alysia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Terza is attached. Terza is rustless. Terza is not merging. Terza is legged. Emelda is costal. Karim is attached. Karim is merging. Karim is external. Jilleen is attached. Jilleen is rustless. Jilleen is not merging. Jilleen is external. Green people are not external. If Emelda is external then Emelda is rustless. If Karim is costal then Karim is legged. If Emelda is not external then Emelda is aggregate. If someone is external and not legged then they are attached. Smart people are attached. Jilleen is legged.", "logic": "\nAttached(terza)\nRustless(terza)\nnot Merging(terza)\nLegged(terza)\nCostal(emelda)\nAttached(karim)\nMerging(karim)\nExternal(karim)\nAttached(jilleen)\nRustless(jilleen)\nnot Merging(jilleen)\nExternal(jilleen)\nforall x (Costal(x) -> not External(x))\nExternal(emelda) -> Rustless(emelda)\nCostal(karim) -> Legged(karim)\nnot External(emelda) -> Aggregate(emelda)\nforall x (External(x) and not Legged(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Aggregate(x) -> Attached(x))\n\nLegged(jilleen)\n\nLegged(jilleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "The joyce is cauline. The joyce sprain the christal. The joyce sprain the darryl. The joyce insist the christal. The christal slobber the darryl. The christal is unblessed. The christal sprain the joyce. The christal insist the joyce. The darryl slobber the joyce. The darryl slobber the christal. The darryl is unmerciful. The darryl is pyrolignic. The darryl is asymptotic. The darryl sprain the christal. The darryl insist the joyce. The darryl insist the christal. If someone slobber the joyce and the joyce insist the darryl then the joyce sprain the christal. If someone sprain the joyce and they see the christal then they are unmerciful. If someone is pyrolignic then they visit the darryl. If someone is cauline then they see the darryl. If someone insist the darryl and the darryl slobber the joyce then they chase the christal. If someone insist the christal then the christal is pyrolignic. The darryl is asymptotic.", "logic": "\nCauline(joyce)\nSprain(joyce, christal)\nSprain(joyce, darryl)\nInsist(joyce, christal)\nSlobber(christal, darryl)\nUnblessed(christal)\nSprain(christal, joyce)\nInsist(christal, joyce)\nSlobber(darryl, joyce)\nSlobber(darryl, christal)\nUnmerciful(darryl)\nPyrolignic(darryl)\nAsymptotic(darryl)\nSprain(darryl, christal)\nInsist(darryl, joyce)\nInsist(darryl, christal)\nforall x (Slobber(x, joyce) and Insist(joyce, darryl) -> Sprain(joyce, christal))\nforall x (Sprain(x, joyce) and Sprain(x, christal) -> Unmerciful(x))\nforall x (Pyrolignic(x) -> Insist(x, darryl))\nforall x (Cauline(x) -> Sprain(x, darryl))\nforall x (Insist(x, darryl) and Slobber(darryl, joyce) -> Slobber(x, christal))\nforall x (Insist(x, christal) -> Pyrolignic(christal))\n\nAsymptotic(darryl)\n\ntherefore Asymptotic(darryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The gretel is unclaimed. The gretel riddle the chery. The gretel riddle the udell. The gretel contend the chery. The chery emend the udell. The chery is viscous. The chery riddle the gretel. The chery contend the gretel. The udell emend the gretel. The udell emend the chery. The udell is rhomboidal. The udell is tegular. The udell is towering. The udell riddle the chery. The udell contend the gretel. The udell contend the chery. If someone emend the gretel and the gretel contend the udell then the gretel riddle the chery. If someone riddle the gretel and they see the chery then they are rhomboidal. If someone is tegular then they visit the udell. If someone is unclaimed then they see the udell. If someone contend the udell and the udell emend the gretel then they chase the chery. If someone contend the chery then the chery is tegular. The chery does not visit the gretel.", "logic": "\nUnclaimed(gretel)\nRiddle(gretel, chery)\nRiddle(gretel, udell)\nContend(gretel, chery)\nEmend(chery, udell)\nViscous(chery)\nRiddle(chery, gretel)\nContend(chery, gretel)\nEmend(udell, gretel)\nEmend(udell, chery)\nRhomboidal(udell)\nTegular(udell)\nTowering(udell)\nRiddle(udell, chery)\nContend(udell, gretel)\nContend(udell, chery)\nforall x (Emend(x, gretel) and Contend(gretel, udell) -> Riddle(gretel, chery))\nforall x (Riddle(x, gretel) and Riddle(x, chery) -> Rhomboidal(x))\nforall x (Tegular(x) -> Contend(x, udell))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Riddle(x, udell))\nforall x (Contend(x, udell) and Emend(udell, gretel) -> Emend(x, chery))\nforall x (Contend(x, chery) -> Tegular(chery))\n\nnot Contend(chery, gretel)\n\ntherefore Contend(chery, gretel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The quigman is missing. The quigman actuate the graham. The quigman actuate the perla. The quigman boomerang the graham. The graham spit the perla. The graham is validating. The graham actuate the quigman. The graham boomerang the quigman. The perla spit the quigman. The perla spit the graham. The perla is deep. The perla is sliding. The perla is sexist. The perla actuate the graham. The perla boomerang the quigman. The perla boomerang the graham. If someone spit the quigman and the quigman boomerang the perla then the quigman actuate the graham. If someone actuate the quigman and they see the graham then they are deep. If someone is sliding then they visit the perla. If someone is missing then they see the perla. If someone boomerang the perla and the perla spit the quigman then they chase the graham. If someone boomerang the graham then the graham is sliding. The perla boomerang the perla.", "logic": "\nMissing(quigman)\nActuate(quigman, graham)\nActuate(quigman, perla)\nBoomerang(quigman, graham)\nSpit(graham, perla)\nValidating(graham)\nActuate(graham, quigman)\nBoomerang(graham, quigman)\nSpit(perla, quigman)\nSpit(perla, graham)\nDeep(perla)\nSliding(perla)\nSexist(perla)\nActuate(perla, graham)\nBoomerang(perla, quigman)\nBoomerang(perla, graham)\nforall x (Spit(x, quigman) and Boomerang(quigman, perla) -> Actuate(quigman, graham))\nforall x (Actuate(x, quigman) and Actuate(x, graham) -> Deep(x))\nforall x (Sliding(x) -> Boomerang(x, perla))\nforall x (Missing(x) -> Actuate(x, perla))\nforall x (Boomerang(x, perla) and Spit(perla, quigman) -> Spit(x, graham))\nforall x (Boomerang(x, graham) -> Sliding(graham))\n\nBoomerang(perla, perla)\n\nSliding(perla) and forall x (Sliding(x) -> Boomerang(x, perla)) -> therefore Boomerang(perla, perla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The anatoly is brunet. The anatoly sponge the merrill. The anatoly sponge the sebastien. The anatoly emanate the merrill. The merrill reenact the sebastien. The merrill is cenobitic. The merrill sponge the anatoly. The merrill emanate the anatoly. The sebastien reenact the anatoly. The sebastien reenact the merrill. The sebastien is grapey. The sebastien is intrusive. The sebastien is indelicate. The sebastien sponge the merrill. The sebastien emanate the anatoly. The sebastien emanate the merrill. If someone reenact the anatoly and the anatoly emanate the sebastien then the anatoly sponge the merrill. If someone sponge the anatoly and they see the merrill then they are grapey. If someone is intrusive then they visit the sebastien. If someone is brunet then they see the sebastien. If someone emanate the sebastien and the sebastien reenact the anatoly then they chase the merrill. If someone emanate the merrill then the merrill is intrusive. The sebastien does not visit the sebastien.", "logic": "\nBrunet(anatoly)\nSponge(anatoly, merrill)\nSponge(anatoly, sebastien)\nEmanate(anatoly, merrill)\nReenact(merrill, sebastien)\nCenobitic(merrill)\nSponge(merrill, anatoly)\nEmanate(merrill, anatoly)\nReenact(sebastien, anatoly)\nReenact(sebastien, merrill)\nGrapey(sebastien)\nIntrusive(sebastien)\nIndelicate(sebastien)\nSponge(sebastien, merrill)\nEmanate(sebastien, anatoly)\nEmanate(sebastien, merrill)\nforall x (Reenact(x, anatoly) and Emanate(anatoly, sebastien) -> Sponge(anatoly, merrill))\nforall x (Sponge(x, anatoly) and Sponge(x, merrill) -> Grapey(x))\nforall x (Intrusive(x) -> Emanate(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Brunet(x) -> Sponge(x, sebastien))\nforall x (Emanate(x, sebastien) and Reenact(sebastien, anatoly) -> Reenact(x, merrill))\nforall x (Emanate(x, merrill) -> Intrusive(merrill))\n\nnot Emanate(sebastien, sebastien)\n\nIntrusive(sebastien) and forall x (Intrusive(x) -> Emanate(x, sebastien)) -> therefore Emanate(sebastien, sebastien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The ulrika is endowed. The ulrika commend the jarvis. The ulrika commend the randa. The ulrika liberalize the jarvis. The jarvis corral the randa. The jarvis is unfastened. The jarvis commend the ulrika. The jarvis liberalize the ulrika. The randa corral the ulrika. The randa corral the jarvis. The randa is impugnable. The randa is uninviting. The randa is turbaned. The randa commend the jarvis. The randa liberalize the ulrika. The randa liberalize the jarvis. If someone corral the ulrika and the ulrika liberalize the randa then the ulrika commend the jarvis. If someone commend the ulrika and they see the jarvis then they are impugnable. If someone is uninviting then they visit the randa. If someone is endowed then they see the randa. If someone liberalize the randa and the randa corral the ulrika then they chase the jarvis. If someone liberalize the jarvis then the jarvis is uninviting. The jarvis liberalize the randa.", "logic": "\nEndowed(ulrika)\nCommend(ulrika, jarvis)\nCommend(ulrika, randa)\nLiberalize(ulrika, jarvis)\nCorral(jarvis, randa)\nUnfastened(jarvis)\nCommend(jarvis, ulrika)\nLiberalize(jarvis, ulrika)\nCorral(randa, ulrika)\nCorral(randa, jarvis)\nImpugnable(randa)\nUninviting(randa)\nTurbaned(randa)\nCommend(randa, jarvis)\nLiberalize(randa, ulrika)\nLiberalize(randa, jarvis)\nforall x (Corral(x, ulrika) and Liberalize(ulrika, randa) -> Commend(ulrika, jarvis))\nforall x (Commend(x, ulrika) and Commend(x, jarvis) -> Impugnable(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> Liberalize(x, randa))\nforall x (Endowed(x) -> Commend(x, randa))\nforall x (Liberalize(x, randa) and Corral(randa, ulrika) -> Corral(x, jarvis))\nforall x (Liberalize(x, jarvis) -> Uninviting(jarvis))\n\nLiberalize(jarvis, randa)\n\nLiberalize(randa, jarvis) and forall x (Liberalize(x, jarvis) -> Uninviting(jarvis)) -> therefore Uninviting(jarvis) Uninviting(jarvis) and forall x (Uninviting(x) -> Liberalize(x, randa)) -> therefore Liberalize(jarvis, randa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The brianne is satellite. The brianne devilize the cosetta. The brianne devilize the gwenny. The brianne unclothe the cosetta. The cosetta plume the gwenny. The cosetta is prognathic. The cosetta devilize the brianne. The cosetta unclothe the brianne. The gwenny plume the brianne. The gwenny plume the cosetta. The gwenny is bilgy. The gwenny is bloodshot. The gwenny is blear. The gwenny devilize the cosetta. The gwenny unclothe the brianne. The gwenny unclothe the cosetta. If someone plume the brianne and the brianne unclothe the gwenny then the brianne devilize the cosetta. If someone devilize the brianne and they see the cosetta then they are bilgy. If someone is bloodshot then they visit the gwenny. If someone is satellite then they see the gwenny. If someone unclothe the gwenny and the gwenny plume the brianne then they chase the cosetta. If someone unclothe the cosetta then the cosetta is bloodshot. The cosetta does not visit the gwenny.", "logic": "\nSatellite(brianne)\nDevilize(brianne, cosetta)\nDevilize(brianne, gwenny)\nUnclothe(brianne, cosetta)\nPlume(cosetta, gwenny)\nPrognathic(cosetta)\nDevilize(cosetta, brianne)\nUnclothe(cosetta, brianne)\nPlume(gwenny, brianne)\nPlume(gwenny, cosetta)\nBilgy(gwenny)\nBloodshot(gwenny)\nBlear(gwenny)\nDevilize(gwenny, cosetta)\nUnclothe(gwenny, brianne)\nUnclothe(gwenny, cosetta)\nforall x (Plume(x, brianne) and Unclothe(brianne, gwenny) -> Devilize(brianne, cosetta))\nforall x (Devilize(x, brianne) and Devilize(x, cosetta) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Unclothe(x, gwenny))\nforall x (Satellite(x) -> Devilize(x, gwenny))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, gwenny) and Plume(gwenny, brianne) -> Plume(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, cosetta) -> Bloodshot(cosetta))\n\nnot Unclothe(cosetta, gwenny)\n\nUnclothe(gwenny, cosetta) and forall x (Unclothe(x, cosetta) -> Bloodshot(cosetta)) -> therefore Bloodshot(cosetta) Bloodshot(cosetta) and forall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Unclothe(x, gwenny)) -> therefore Unclothe(cosetta, gwenny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The barrett is perfoliate. The barrett regard the cammi. The barrett regard the charleen. The barrett allay the cammi. The cammi forfend the charleen. The cammi is like. The cammi regard the barrett. The cammi allay the barrett. The charleen forfend the barrett. The charleen forfend the cammi. The charleen is colored. The charleen is sceptered. The charleen is incurious. The charleen regard the cammi. The charleen allay the barrett. The charleen allay the cammi. If someone forfend the barrett and the barrett allay the charleen then the barrett regard the cammi. If someone regard the barrett and they see the cammi then they are colored. If someone is sceptered then they visit the charleen. If someone is perfoliate then they see the charleen. If someone allay the charleen and the charleen forfend the barrett then they chase the cammi. If someone allay the cammi then the cammi is sceptered. The cammi forfend the cammi.", "logic": "\nPerfoliate(barrett)\nRegard(barrett, cammi)\nRegard(barrett, charleen)\nAllay(barrett, cammi)\nForfend(cammi, charleen)\nLike(cammi)\nRegard(cammi, barrett)\nAllay(cammi, barrett)\nForfend(charleen, barrett)\nForfend(charleen, cammi)\nColored(charleen)\nSceptered(charleen)\nIncurious(charleen)\nRegard(charleen, cammi)\nAllay(charleen, barrett)\nAllay(charleen, cammi)\nforall x (Forfend(x, barrett) and Allay(barrett, charleen) -> Regard(barrett, cammi))\nforall x (Regard(x, barrett) and Regard(x, cammi) -> Colored(x))\nforall x (Sceptered(x) -> Allay(x, charleen))\nforall x (Perfoliate(x) -> Regard(x, charleen))\nforall x (Allay(x, charleen) and Forfend(charleen, barrett) -> Forfend(x, cammi))\nforall x (Allay(x, cammi) -> Sceptered(cammi))\n\nForfend(cammi, cammi)\n\nAllay(charleen, cammi) and forall x (Allay(x, cammi) -> Sceptered(cammi)) -> therefore Sceptered(cammi) Sceptered(cammi) and forall x (Sceptered(x) -> Allay(x, charleen)) -> therefore Allay(cammi, charleen) Allay(cammi, charleen) and Forfend(charleen, barrett) and forall x (Allay(x, charleen) and Forfend(charleen, barrett) -> Forfend(x, cammi)) -> therefore Forfend(cammi, cammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The pascale is dendriform. The pascale startle the nevins. The pascale startle the geraldo. The pascale recline the nevins. The nevins prepare the geraldo. The nevins is gangly. The nevins startle the pascale. The nevins recline the pascale. The geraldo prepare the pascale. The geraldo prepare the nevins. The geraldo is speakable. The geraldo is myeloid. The geraldo is coordinate. The geraldo startle the nevins. The geraldo recline the pascale. The geraldo recline the nevins. If someone prepare the pascale and the pascale recline the geraldo then the pascale startle the nevins. If someone startle the pascale and they see the nevins then they are speakable. If someone is myeloid then they visit the geraldo. If someone is dendriform then they see the geraldo. If someone recline the geraldo and the geraldo prepare the pascale then they chase the nevins. If someone recline the nevins then the nevins is myeloid. The nevins does not chase the nevins.", "logic": "\nDendriform(pascale)\nStartle(pascale, nevins)\nStartle(pascale, geraldo)\nRecline(pascale, nevins)\nPrepare(nevins, geraldo)\nGangly(nevins)\nStartle(nevins, pascale)\nRecline(nevins, pascale)\nPrepare(geraldo, pascale)\nPrepare(geraldo, nevins)\nSpeakable(geraldo)\nMyeloid(geraldo)\nCoordinate(geraldo)\nStartle(geraldo, nevins)\nRecline(geraldo, pascale)\nRecline(geraldo, nevins)\nforall x (Prepare(x, pascale) and Recline(pascale, geraldo) -> Startle(pascale, nevins))\nforall x (Startle(x, pascale) and Startle(x, nevins) -> Speakable(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) -> Recline(x, geraldo))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) -> Startle(x, geraldo))\nforall x (Recline(x, geraldo) and Prepare(geraldo, pascale) -> Prepare(x, nevins))\nforall x (Recline(x, nevins) -> Myeloid(nevins))\n\nnot Prepare(nevins, nevins)\n\nRecline(geraldo, nevins) and forall x (Recline(x, nevins) -> Myeloid(nevins)) -> therefore Myeloid(nevins) Myeloid(nevins) and forall x (Myeloid(x) -> Recline(x, geraldo)) -> therefore Recline(nevins, geraldo) Recline(nevins, geraldo) and Prepare(geraldo, pascale) and forall x (Recline(x, geraldo) and Prepare(geraldo, pascale) -> Prepare(x, nevins)) -> therefore Prepare(nevins, nevins)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The lenora is indecisive. The lenora engineer the moses. The lenora engineer the stephan. The lenora compute the moses. The moses gargle the stephan. The moses is acerb. The moses engineer the lenora. The moses compute the lenora. The stephan gargle the lenora. The stephan gargle the moses. The stephan is tempting. The stephan is quantized. The stephan is acetabular. The stephan engineer the moses. The stephan compute the lenora. The stephan compute the moses. If someone gargle the lenora and the lenora compute the stephan then the lenora engineer the moses. If someone engineer the lenora and they see the moses then they are tempting. If someone is quantized then they visit the stephan. If someone is indecisive then they see the stephan. If someone compute the stephan and the stephan gargle the lenora then they chase the moses. If someone compute the moses then the moses is quantized. The stephan does not see the stephan.", "logic": "\nIndecisive(lenora)\nEngineer(lenora, moses)\nEngineer(lenora, stephan)\nCompute(lenora, moses)\nGargle(moses, stephan)\nAcerb(moses)\nEngineer(moses, lenora)\nCompute(moses, lenora)\nGargle(stephan, lenora)\nGargle(stephan, moses)\nTempting(stephan)\nQuantized(stephan)\nAcetabular(stephan)\nEngineer(stephan, moses)\nCompute(stephan, lenora)\nCompute(stephan, moses)\nforall x (Gargle(x, lenora) and Compute(lenora, stephan) -> Engineer(lenora, moses))\nforall x (Engineer(x, lenora) and Engineer(x, moses) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Quantized(x) -> Compute(x, stephan))\nforall x (Indecisive(x) -> Engineer(x, stephan))\nforall x (Compute(x, stephan) and Gargle(stephan, lenora) -> Gargle(x, moses))\nforall x (Compute(x, moses) -> Quantized(moses))\n\nnot Engineer(stephan, stephan)\n\nforall x (Indecisive(x) -> Engineer(x, stephan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The lawton is ribless. The lawton keen the hallie. The lawton keen the lyndel. The lawton congeal the hallie. The hallie perennate the lyndel. The hallie is violative. The hallie keen the lawton. The hallie congeal the lawton. The lyndel perennate the lawton. The lyndel perennate the hallie. The lyndel is compelling. The lyndel is tarsal. The lyndel is deepening. The lyndel keen the hallie. The lyndel congeal the lawton. The lyndel congeal the hallie. If someone perennate the lawton and the lawton congeal the lyndel then the lawton keen the hallie. If someone keen the lawton and they see the hallie then they are compelling. If someone is tarsal then they visit the lyndel. If someone is ribless then they see the lyndel. If someone congeal the lyndel and the lyndel perennate the lawton then they chase the hallie. If someone congeal the hallie then the hallie is tarsal. The hallie keen the lyndel.", "logic": "\nRibless(lawton)\nKeen(lawton, hallie)\nKeen(lawton, lyndel)\nCongeal(lawton, hallie)\nPerennate(hallie, lyndel)\nViolative(hallie)\nKeen(hallie, lawton)\nCongeal(hallie, lawton)\nPerennate(lyndel, lawton)\nPerennate(lyndel, hallie)\nCompelling(lyndel)\nTarsal(lyndel)\nDeepening(lyndel)\nKeen(lyndel, hallie)\nCongeal(lyndel, lawton)\nCongeal(lyndel, hallie)\nforall x (Perennate(x, lawton) and Congeal(lawton, lyndel) -> Keen(lawton, hallie))\nforall x (Keen(x, lawton) and Keen(x, hallie) -> Compelling(x))\nforall x (Tarsal(x) -> Congeal(x, lyndel))\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Keen(x, lyndel))\nforall x (Congeal(x, lyndel) and Perennate(lyndel, lawton) -> Perennate(x, hallie))\nforall x (Congeal(x, hallie) -> Tarsal(hallie))\n\nKeen(hallie, lyndel)\n\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Keen(x, lyndel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The micki is answering. The micki undo the carolynn. The micki undo the stillmann. The micki tipple the carolynn. The carolynn grubstake the stillmann. The carolynn is mirthless. The carolynn undo the micki. The carolynn tipple the micki. The stillmann grubstake the micki. The stillmann grubstake the carolynn. The stillmann is tart. The stillmann is initial. The stillmann is uncoupled. The stillmann undo the carolynn. The stillmann tipple the micki. The stillmann tipple the carolynn. If someone grubstake the micki and the micki tipple the stillmann then the micki undo the carolynn. If someone undo the micki and they see the carolynn then they are tart. If someone is initial then they visit the stillmann. If someone is answering then they see the stillmann. If someone tipple the stillmann and the stillmann grubstake the micki then they chase the carolynn. If someone tipple the carolynn then the carolynn is initial. The micki does not visit the stillmann.", "logic": "\nAnswering(micki)\nUndo(micki, carolynn)\nUndo(micki, stillmann)\nTipple(micki, carolynn)\nGrubstake(carolynn, stillmann)\nMirthless(carolynn)\nUndo(carolynn, micki)\nTipple(carolynn, micki)\nGrubstake(stillmann, micki)\nGrubstake(stillmann, carolynn)\nTart(stillmann)\nInitial(stillmann)\nUncoupled(stillmann)\nUndo(stillmann, carolynn)\nTipple(stillmann, micki)\nTipple(stillmann, carolynn)\nforall x (Grubstake(x, micki) and Tipple(micki, stillmann) -> Undo(micki, carolynn))\nforall x (Undo(x, micki) and Undo(x, carolynn) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Initial(x) -> Tipple(x, stillmann))\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Undo(x, stillmann))\nforall x (Tipple(x, stillmann) and Grubstake(stillmann, micki) -> Grubstake(x, carolynn))\nforall x (Tipple(x, carolynn) -> Initial(carolynn))\n\nnot Tipple(micki, stillmann)\n\nforall x (Initial(x) -> Tipple(x, stillmann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The erinn is norwegian. The erinn ascertain the red. The erinn ascertain the caro. The erinn anguish the red. The red rant the caro. The red is pained. The red ascertain the erinn. The red anguish the erinn. The caro rant the erinn. The caro rant the red. The caro is poached. The caro is genital. The caro is profane. The caro ascertain the red. The caro anguish the erinn. The caro anguish the red. If someone rant the erinn and the erinn anguish the caro then the erinn ascertain the red. If someone ascertain the erinn and they see the red then they are poached. If someone is genital then they visit the caro. If someone is norwegian then they see the caro. If someone anguish the caro and the caro rant the erinn then they chase the red. If someone anguish the red then the red is genital. The erinn is poached.", "logic": "\nNorwegian(erinn)\nAscertain(erinn, red)\nAscertain(erinn, caro)\nAnguish(erinn, red)\nRant(red, caro)\nPained(red)\nAscertain(red, erinn)\nAnguish(red, erinn)\nRant(caro, erinn)\nRant(caro, red)\nPoached(caro)\nGenital(caro)\nProfane(caro)\nAscertain(caro, red)\nAnguish(caro, erinn)\nAnguish(caro, red)\nforall x (Rant(x, erinn) and Anguish(erinn, caro) -> Ascertain(erinn, red))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, erinn) and Ascertain(x, red) -> Poached(x))\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Anguish(x, caro))\nforall x (Norwegian(x) -> Ascertain(x, caro))\nforall x (Anguish(x, caro) and Rant(caro, erinn) -> Rant(x, red))\nforall x (Anguish(x, red) -> Genital(red))\n\nPoached(erinn)\n\nforall x (Ascertain(x, erinn) and Ascertain(x, red) -> Poached(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The corri is lifelike. The corri debauch the willey. The corri debauch the cyrus. The corri staple the willey. The willey welsh the cyrus. The willey is quaint. The willey debauch the corri. The willey staple the corri. The cyrus welsh the corri. The cyrus welsh the willey. The cyrus is happy. The cyrus is epiphytic. The cyrus is mutualist. The cyrus debauch the willey. The cyrus staple the corri. The cyrus staple the willey. If someone welsh the corri and the corri staple the cyrus then the corri debauch the willey. If someone debauch the corri and they see the willey then they are happy. If someone is epiphytic then they visit the cyrus. If someone is lifelike then they see the cyrus. If someone staple the cyrus and the cyrus welsh the corri then they chase the willey. If someone staple the willey then the willey is epiphytic. The cyrus is not quaint.", "logic": "\nLifelike(corri)\nDebauch(corri, willey)\nDebauch(corri, cyrus)\nStaple(corri, willey)\nWelsh(willey, cyrus)\nQuaint(willey)\nDebauch(willey, corri)\nStaple(willey, corri)\nWelsh(cyrus, corri)\nWelsh(cyrus, willey)\nHappy(cyrus)\nEpiphytic(cyrus)\nMutualist(cyrus)\nDebauch(cyrus, willey)\nStaple(cyrus, corri)\nStaple(cyrus, willey)\nforall x (Welsh(x, corri) and Staple(corri, cyrus) -> Debauch(corri, willey))\nforall x (Debauch(x, corri) and Debauch(x, willey) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) -> Staple(x, cyrus))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> Debauch(x, cyrus))\nforall x (Staple(x, cyrus) and Welsh(cyrus, corri) -> Welsh(x, willey))\nforall x (Staple(x, willey) -> Epiphytic(willey))\n\nnot Quaint(cyrus)\n\nnot Quaint(cyrus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The emlynne is textile. The emlynne crape the ingram. The emlynne crape the richard. The emlynne spoof the ingram. The ingram equate the richard. The ingram is spineless. The ingram crape the emlynne. The ingram spoof the emlynne. The richard equate the emlynne. The richard equate the ingram. The richard is abysmal. The richard is untold. The richard is famous. The richard crape the ingram. The richard spoof the emlynne. The richard spoof the ingram. If someone equate the emlynne and the emlynne spoof the richard then the emlynne crape the ingram. If someone crape the emlynne and they see the ingram then they are abysmal. If someone is untold then they visit the richard. If someone is textile then they see the richard. If someone spoof the richard and the richard equate the emlynne then they chase the ingram. If someone spoof the ingram then the ingram is untold. The richard crape the emlynne.", "logic": "\nTextile(emlynne)\nCrape(emlynne, ingram)\nCrape(emlynne, richard)\nSpoof(emlynne, ingram)\nEquate(ingram, richard)\nSpineless(ingram)\nCrape(ingram, emlynne)\nSpoof(ingram, emlynne)\nEquate(richard, emlynne)\nEquate(richard, ingram)\nAbysmal(richard)\nUntold(richard)\nFamous(richard)\nCrape(richard, ingram)\nSpoof(richard, emlynne)\nSpoof(richard, ingram)\nforall x (Equate(x, emlynne) and Spoof(emlynne, richard) -> Crape(emlynne, ingram))\nforall x (Crape(x, emlynne) and Crape(x, ingram) -> Abysmal(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Spoof(x, richard))\nforall x (Textile(x) -> Crape(x, richard))\nforall x (Spoof(x, richard) and Equate(richard, emlynne) -> Equate(x, ingram))\nforall x (Spoof(x, ingram) -> Untold(ingram))\n\nCrape(richard, emlynne)\n\nCrape(richard, emlynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The fania is careful. The fania libel the nerti. The fania libel the parker. The fania torment the nerti. The nerti wreak the parker. The nerti is dopy. The nerti libel the fania. The nerti torment the fania. The parker wreak the fania. The parker wreak the nerti. The parker is inmost. The parker is beechen. The parker is aboral. The parker libel the nerti. The parker torment the fania. The parker torment the nerti. If someone wreak the fania and the fania torment the parker then the fania libel the nerti. If someone libel the fania and they see the nerti then they are inmost. If someone is beechen then they visit the parker. If someone is careful then they see the parker. If someone torment the parker and the parker wreak the fania then they chase the nerti. If someone torment the nerti then the nerti is beechen. The parker is not careful.", "logic": "\nCareful(fania)\nLibel(fania, nerti)\nLibel(fania, parker)\nTorment(fania, nerti)\nWreak(nerti, parker)\nDopy(nerti)\nLibel(nerti, fania)\nTorment(nerti, fania)\nWreak(parker, fania)\nWreak(parker, nerti)\nInmost(parker)\nBeechen(parker)\nAboral(parker)\nLibel(parker, nerti)\nTorment(parker, fania)\nTorment(parker, nerti)\nforall x (Wreak(x, fania) and Torment(fania, parker) -> Libel(fania, nerti))\nforall x (Libel(x, fania) and Libel(x, nerti) -> Inmost(x))\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> Torment(x, parker))\nforall x (Careful(x) -> Libel(x, parker))\nforall x (Torment(x, parker) and Wreak(parker, fania) -> Wreak(x, nerti))\nforall x (Torment(x, nerti) -> Beechen(nerti))\n\nnot Careful(parker)\n\nnot Careful(parker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The waylon is flemish. The waylon boom the derrick. The waylon boom the bobbi. The waylon tally the derrick. The derrick hack the bobbi. The derrick is dilute. The derrick boom the waylon. The derrick tally the waylon. The bobbi hack the waylon. The bobbi hack the derrick. The bobbi is defamatory. The bobbi is lanceolate. The bobbi is figural. The bobbi boom the derrick. The bobbi tally the waylon. The bobbi tally the derrick. If someone hack the waylon and the waylon tally the bobbi then the waylon boom the derrick. If someone boom the waylon and they see the derrick then they are defamatory. If someone is lanceolate then they visit the bobbi. If someone is flemish then they see the bobbi. If someone tally the bobbi and the bobbi hack the waylon then they chase the derrick. If someone tally the derrick then the derrick is lanceolate. The waylon hack the waylon.", "logic": "\nFlemish(waylon)\nBoom(waylon, derrick)\nBoom(waylon, bobbi)\nTally(waylon, derrick)\nHack(derrick, bobbi)\nDilute(derrick)\nBoom(derrick, waylon)\nTally(derrick, waylon)\nHack(bobbi, waylon)\nHack(bobbi, derrick)\nDefamatory(bobbi)\nLanceolate(bobbi)\nFigural(bobbi)\nBoom(bobbi, derrick)\nTally(bobbi, waylon)\nTally(bobbi, derrick)\nforall x (Hack(x, waylon) and Tally(waylon, bobbi) -> Boom(waylon, derrick))\nforall x (Boom(x, waylon) and Boom(x, derrick) -> Defamatory(x))\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) -> Tally(x, bobbi))\nforall x (Flemish(x) -> Boom(x, bobbi))\nforall x (Tally(x, bobbi) and Hack(bobbi, waylon) -> Hack(x, derrick))\nforall x (Tally(x, derrick) -> Lanceolate(derrick))\n\nHack(waylon, waylon)\n\nHack(waylon, waylon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Tamara is unequalled. Tamara is homophonic. Tamara is winy. Tamara is oleaginous. Tamara is sideways. Lyndell is homophonic. Lyndell is sideways. If someone is winy and sideways then they are binucleate. Young people are winy. If Tamara is winy then Tamara is binucleate. Red people are oleaginous. Red, binucleate people are contained. If someone is unequalled then they are winy. Tamara is unequalled.", "logic": "\nUnequalled(tamara)\nHomophonic(tamara)\nWiny(tamara)\nOleaginous(tamara)\nSideways(tamara)\nHomophonic(lyndell)\nSideways(lyndell)\nforall x (Winy(x) and Sideways(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Sideways(x) -> Winy(x))\nWiny(tamara) -> Binucleate(tamara)\nforall x (Winy(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Winy(x) and Binucleate(x) -> Contained(x))\nforall x (Unequalled(x) -> Winy(x))\n\nUnequalled(tamara)\n\ntherefore Unequalled(tamara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Cindelyn is maplelike. Cindelyn is unreported. Cindelyn is ascribable. Cindelyn is awestruck. Cindelyn is formative. Lilyan is unreported. Lilyan is formative. If someone is ascribable and formative then they are gothic. Young people are ascribable. If Cindelyn is ascribable then Cindelyn is gothic. Red people are awestruck. Red, gothic people are scythian. If someone is maplelike then they are ascribable. Cindelyn is not unreported.", "logic": "\nMaplelike(cindelyn)\nUnreported(cindelyn)\nAscribable(cindelyn)\nAwestruck(cindelyn)\nFormative(cindelyn)\nUnreported(lilyan)\nFormative(lilyan)\nforall x (Ascribable(x) and Formative(x) -> Gothic(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) -> Ascribable(x))\nAscribable(cindelyn) -> Gothic(cindelyn)\nforall x (Ascribable(x) -> Awestruck(x))\nforall x (Ascribable(x) and Gothic(x) -> Scythian(x))\nforall x (Maplelike(x) -> Ascribable(x))\n\nnot Unreported(cindelyn)\n\ntherefore Unreported(cindelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Berna is tipsy. Berna is fulminant. Berna is apparent. Berna is overt. Berna is blown. Zechariah is fulminant. Zechariah is blown. If someone is apparent and blown then they are horizontal. Young people are apparent. If Berna is apparent then Berna is horizontal. Red people are overt. Red, horizontal people are plain. If someone is tipsy then they are apparent. Berna is horizontal.", "logic": "\nTipsy(berna)\nFulminant(berna)\nApparent(berna)\nOvert(berna)\nBlown(berna)\nFulminant(zechariah)\nBlown(zechariah)\nforall x (Apparent(x) and Blown(x) -> Horizontal(x))\nforall x (Blown(x) -> Apparent(x))\nApparent(berna) -> Horizontal(berna)\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Overt(x))\nforall x (Apparent(x) and Horizontal(x) -> Plain(x))\nforall x (Tipsy(x) -> Apparent(x))\n\nHorizontal(berna)\n\nApparent(berna) and Apparent(berna) -> Horizontal(berna) -> therefore Horizontal(berna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Hans is columbian. Hans is minty. Hans is disarming. Hans is worried. Hans is peccant. Sarajane is minty. Sarajane is peccant. If someone is disarming and peccant then they are unequalled. Young people are disarming. If Hans is disarming then Hans is unequalled. Red people are worried. Red, unequalled people are each. If someone is columbian then they are disarming. Hans is not unequalled.", "logic": "\nColumbian(hans)\nMinty(hans)\nDisarming(hans)\nWorried(hans)\nPeccant(hans)\nMinty(sarajane)\nPeccant(sarajane)\nforall x (Disarming(x) and Peccant(x) -> Unequalled(x))\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Disarming(x))\nDisarming(hans) -> Unequalled(hans)\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Worried(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) and Unequalled(x) -> Each(x))\nforall x (Columbian(x) -> Disarming(x))\n\nnot Unequalled(hans)\n\nDisarming(hans) and Disarming(hans) -> Unequalled(hans) -> therefore Unequalled(hans)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Ferguson is secular. Ferguson is urban. Ferguson is icteric. Ferguson is ruby. Ferguson is disunited. Piper is urban. Piper is disunited. If someone is icteric and disunited then they are extra. Young people are icteric. If Ferguson is icteric then Ferguson is extra. Red people are ruby. Red, extra people are imported. If someone is secular then they are icteric. Piper is extra.", "logic": "\nSecular(ferguson)\nUrban(ferguson)\nIcteric(ferguson)\nRuby(ferguson)\nDisunited(ferguson)\nUrban(piper)\nDisunited(piper)\nforall x (Icteric(x) and Disunited(x) -> Extra(x))\nforall x (Disunited(x) -> Icteric(x))\nIcteric(ferguson) -> Extra(ferguson)\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> Ruby(x))\nforall x (Icteric(x) and Extra(x) -> Imported(x))\nforall x (Secular(x) -> Icteric(x))\n\nExtra(piper)\n\nDisunited(piper) and forall x (Disunited(x) -> Icteric(x)) -> therefore Icteric(piper) Icteric(piper) and Disunited(piper) and forall x (Icteric(x) and Disunited(x) -> Extra(x)) -> therefore Extra(piper)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Buck is naked. Buck is seraphic. Buck is heinous. Buck is trackless. Buck is dismal. Giraldo is seraphic. Giraldo is dismal. If someone is heinous and dismal then they are snarled. Young people are heinous. If Buck is heinous then Buck is snarled. Red people are trackless. Red, snarled people are falconine. If someone is naked then they are heinous. Giraldo is not trackless.", "logic": "\nNaked(buck)\nSeraphic(buck)\nHeinous(buck)\nTrackless(buck)\nDismal(buck)\nSeraphic(giraldo)\nDismal(giraldo)\nforall x (Heinous(x) and Dismal(x) -> Snarled(x))\nforall x (Dismal(x) -> Heinous(x))\nHeinous(buck) -> Snarled(buck)\nforall x (Heinous(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Heinous(x) and Snarled(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Naked(x) -> Heinous(x))\n\nnot Trackless(giraldo)\n\nDismal(giraldo) and forall x (Dismal(x) -> Heinous(x)) -> therefore Heinous(giraldo) Heinous(giraldo) and forall x (Heinous(x) -> Trackless(x)) -> therefore Trackless(giraldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Prunella is slovenian. Prunella is solitary. Prunella is tortuous. Prunella is expedient. Prunella is oversewn. Linea is solitary. Linea is oversewn. If someone is tortuous and oversewn then they are slouchy. Young people are tortuous. If Prunella is tortuous then Prunella is slouchy. Red people are expedient. Red, slouchy people are pappose. If someone is slovenian then they are tortuous. Linea is pappose.", "logic": "\nSlovenian(prunella)\nSolitary(prunella)\nTortuous(prunella)\nExpedient(prunella)\nOversewn(prunella)\nSolitary(linea)\nOversewn(linea)\nforall x (Tortuous(x) and Oversewn(x) -> Slouchy(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nTortuous(prunella) -> Slouchy(prunella)\nforall x (Tortuous(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Tortuous(x) and Slouchy(x) -> Pappose(x))\nforall x (Slovenian(x) -> Tortuous(x))\n\nPappose(linea)\n\nOversewn(linea) and forall x (Oversewn(x) -> Tortuous(x)) -> therefore Tortuous(linea) Oversewn(linea) and forall x (Oversewn(x) -> Tortuous(x)) -> therefore Tortuous(linea) Tortuous(linea) and Oversewn(linea) and forall x (Tortuous(x) and Oversewn(x) -> Slouchy(x)) -> therefore Slouchy(linea) Tortuous(linea) and Slouchy(linea) and forall x (Tortuous(x) and Slouchy(x) -> Pappose(x)) -> therefore Pappose(linea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Vitia is rutted. Vitia is unwonted. Vitia is said. Vitia is buckram. Vitia is arcadian. Misti is unwonted. Misti is arcadian. If someone is said and arcadian then they are smuggled. Young people are said. If Vitia is said then Vitia is smuggled. Red people are buckram. Red, smuggled people are offended. If someone is rutted then they are said. Misti is not offended.", "logic": "\nRutted(vitia)\nUnwonted(vitia)\nSaid(vitia)\nBuckram(vitia)\nArcadian(vitia)\nUnwonted(misti)\nArcadian(misti)\nforall x (Said(x) and Arcadian(x) -> Smuggled(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> Said(x))\nSaid(vitia) -> Smuggled(vitia)\nforall x (Said(x) -> Buckram(x))\nforall x (Said(x) and Smuggled(x) -> Offended(x))\nforall x (Rutted(x) -> Said(x))\n\nnot Offended(misti)\n\nArcadian(misti) and forall x (Arcadian(x) -> Said(x)) -> therefore Said(misti) Arcadian(misti) and forall x (Arcadian(x) -> Said(x)) -> therefore Said(misti) Said(misti) and Arcadian(misti) and forall x (Said(x) and Arcadian(x) -> Smuggled(x)) -> therefore Smuggled(misti) Said(misti) and Smuggled(misti) and forall x (Said(x) and Smuggled(x) -> Offended(x)) -> therefore Offended(misti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Abner is optical. Abner is repelling. Abner is overlarge. Abner is bedridden. Abner is hurtful. Abner is akimbo. Vonni is hurtful. Smart people are hurtful. All hurtful people are optical. All overlarge, hurtful people are repelling. Nice people are overlarge. Quiet people are bedridden. If Abner is bedridden then Abner is hurtful. Abner is optical.", "logic": "\nOptical(abner)\nRepelling(abner)\nOverlarge(abner)\nBedridden(abner)\nHurtful(abner)\nAkimbo(abner)\nHurtful(vonni)\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Hurtful(x))\nforall x (Hurtful(x) -> Optical(x))\nforall x (Overlarge(x) and Hurtful(x) -> Repelling(x))\nforall x (Bedridden(x) -> Overlarge(x))\nforall x (Hurtful(x) -> Bedridden(x))\nBedridden(abner) -> Hurtful(abner)\n\nOptical(abner)\n\ntherefore Optical(abner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Foster is realizable. Foster is outside. Foster is tolerant. Foster is gratifying. Foster is concealing. Foster is hard. Glennie is concealing. Smart people are concealing. All concealing people are realizable. All tolerant, concealing people are outside. Nice people are tolerant. Quiet people are gratifying. If Foster is gratifying then Foster is concealing. Foster is not hard.", "logic": "\nRealizable(foster)\nOutside(foster)\nTolerant(foster)\nGratifying(foster)\nConcealing(foster)\nHard(foster)\nConcealing(glennie)\nforall x (Hard(x) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Realizable(x))\nforall x (Tolerant(x) and Concealing(x) -> Outside(x))\nforall x (Gratifying(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Gratifying(x))\nGratifying(foster) -> Concealing(foster)\n\nnot Hard(foster)\n\ntherefore Hard(foster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Rochelle is ischemic. Rochelle is philatelic. Rochelle is laden. Rochelle is referent. Rochelle is slowgoing. Rochelle is positive. Vanessa is slowgoing. Smart people are slowgoing. All slowgoing people are ischemic. All laden, slowgoing people are philatelic. Nice people are laden. Quiet people are referent. If Rochelle is referent then Rochelle is slowgoing. Vanessa is ischemic.", "logic": "\nIschemic(rochelle)\nPhilatelic(rochelle)\nLaden(rochelle)\nReferent(rochelle)\nSlowgoing(rochelle)\nPositive(rochelle)\nSlowgoing(vanessa)\nforall x (Positive(x) -> Slowgoing(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Ischemic(x))\nforall x (Laden(x) and Slowgoing(x) -> Philatelic(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Referent(x))\nReferent(rochelle) -> Slowgoing(rochelle)\n\nIschemic(vanessa)\n\nSlowgoing(vanessa) and forall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Ischemic(x)) -> therefore Ischemic(vanessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Nadeen is isotropous. Nadeen is cxlv. Nadeen is rubbery. Nadeen is costive. Nadeen is despoiled. Nadeen is apodal. Clotilda is despoiled. Smart people are despoiled. All despoiled people are isotropous. All rubbery, despoiled people are cxlv. Nice people are rubbery. Quiet people are costive. If Nadeen is costive then Nadeen is despoiled. Clotilda is not isotropous.", "logic": "\nIsotropous(nadeen)\nCxlv(nadeen)\nRubbery(nadeen)\nCostive(nadeen)\nDespoiled(nadeen)\nApodal(nadeen)\nDespoiled(clotilda)\nforall x (Apodal(x) -> Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Despoiled(x) -> Isotropous(x))\nforall x (Rubbery(x) and Despoiled(x) -> Cxlv(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Despoiled(x) -> Costive(x))\nCostive(nadeen) -> Despoiled(nadeen)\n\nnot Isotropous(clotilda)\n\nDespoiled(clotilda) and forall x (Despoiled(x) -> Isotropous(x)) -> therefore Isotropous(clotilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Wrennie is unpierced. Wrennie is goosy. Wrennie is pessimum. Wrennie is mercurous. Wrennie is unthematic. Wrennie is inspired. Sissy is unthematic. Smart people are unthematic. All unthematic people are unpierced. All pessimum, unthematic people are goosy. Nice people are pessimum. Quiet people are mercurous. If Wrennie is mercurous then Wrennie is unthematic. Sissy is pessimum.", "logic": "\nUnpierced(wrennie)\nGoosy(wrennie)\nPessimum(wrennie)\nMercurous(wrennie)\nUnthematic(wrennie)\nInspired(wrennie)\nUnthematic(sissy)\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Unthematic(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Unpierced(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) and Unthematic(x) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Mercurous(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Mercurous(x))\nMercurous(wrennie) -> Unthematic(wrennie)\n\nPessimum(sissy)\n\nUnthematic(sissy) and forall x (Unthematic(x) -> Mercurous(x)) -> therefore Mercurous(sissy) Mercurous(sissy) and forall x (Mercurous(x) -> Pessimum(x)) -> therefore Pessimum(sissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Linea is upscale. Linea is curious. Linea is sublunary. Linea is fearful. Linea is seven. Linea is dirty. Risa is seven. Smart people are seven. All seven people are upscale. All sublunary, seven people are curious. Nice people are sublunary. Quiet people are fearful. If Linea is fearful then Linea is seven. Risa is not sublunary.", "logic": "\nUpscale(linea)\nCurious(linea)\nSublunary(linea)\nFearful(linea)\nSeven(linea)\nDirty(linea)\nSeven(risa)\nforall x (Dirty(x) -> Seven(x))\nforall x (Seven(x) -> Upscale(x))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) and Seven(x) -> Curious(x))\nforall x (Fearful(x) -> Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Seven(x) -> Fearful(x))\nFearful(linea) -> Seven(linea)\n\nnot Sublunary(risa)\n\nSeven(risa) and forall x (Seven(x) -> Fearful(x)) -> therefore Fearful(risa) Fearful(risa) and forall x (Fearful(x) -> Sublunary(x)) -> therefore Sublunary(risa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Marcela is proven. Marcela is hopeless. Marcela is unromantic. Marcela is digestive. Marcela is aliform. Marcela is buttressed. Neal is aliform. Smart people are aliform. All aliform people are proven. All unromantic, aliform people are hopeless. Nice people are unromantic. Quiet people are digestive. If Marcela is digestive then Marcela is aliform. Neal is hopeless.", "logic": "\nProven(marcela)\nHopeless(marcela)\nUnromantic(marcela)\nDigestive(marcela)\nAliform(marcela)\nButtressed(marcela)\nAliform(neal)\nforall x (Buttressed(x) -> Aliform(x))\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Proven(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) and Aliform(x) -> Hopeless(x))\nforall x (Digestive(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Digestive(x))\nDigestive(marcela) -> Aliform(marcela)\n\nHopeless(neal)\n\nAliform(neal) and forall x (Aliform(x) -> Digestive(x)) -> therefore Digestive(neal) Digestive(neal) and forall x (Digestive(x) -> Unromantic(x)) -> therefore Unromantic(neal) Unromantic(neal) and Aliform(neal) and forall x (Unromantic(x) and Aliform(x) -> Hopeless(x)) -> therefore Hopeless(neal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Leigha is defiled. Leigha is weepy. Leigha is fanatical. Leigha is captive. Leigha is exploded. Leigha is quartzose. Waldon is exploded. Smart people are exploded. All exploded people are defiled. All fanatical, exploded people are weepy. Nice people are fanatical. Quiet people are captive. If Leigha is captive then Leigha is exploded. Waldon is not weepy.", "logic": "\nDefiled(leigha)\nWeepy(leigha)\nFanatical(leigha)\nCaptive(leigha)\nExploded(leigha)\nQuartzose(leigha)\nExploded(waldon)\nforall x (Quartzose(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Fanatical(x) and Exploded(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Fanatical(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Captive(x))\nCaptive(leigha) -> Exploded(leigha)\n\nnot Weepy(waldon)\n\nExploded(waldon) and forall x (Exploded(x) -> Captive(x)) -> therefore Captive(waldon) Captive(waldon) and forall x (Captive(x) -> Fanatical(x)) -> therefore Fanatical(waldon) Fanatical(waldon) and Exploded(waldon) and forall x (Fanatical(x) and Exploded(x) -> Weepy(x)) -> therefore Weepy(waldon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Curtis is nonexempt. Curtis is ersatz. Curtis is plumate. Curtis is starred. Curtis is postmortal. Curtis is glowing. Sammy is postmortal. Smart people are postmortal. All postmortal people are nonexempt. All plumate, postmortal people are ersatz. Nice people are plumate. Quiet people are starred. If Curtis is starred then Curtis is postmortal. Curtis is not young.", "logic": "\nNonexempt(curtis)\nErsatz(curtis)\nPlumate(curtis)\nStarred(curtis)\nPostmortal(curtis)\nGlowing(curtis)\nPostmortal(sammy)\nforall x (Glowing(x) -> Postmortal(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\nforall x (Plumate(x) and Postmortal(x) -> Ersatz(x))\nforall x (Starred(x) -> Plumate(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) -> Starred(x))\nStarred(curtis) -> Postmortal(curtis)\n\nnot Young(curtis)\n\nnot Young(curtis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Therine is unexciting. Therine is synthetic. Therine is interstate. Therine is based. Therine is redbrick. Therine is unratable. Arly is redbrick. Smart people are redbrick. All redbrick people are unexciting. All interstate, redbrick people are synthetic. Nice people are interstate. Quiet people are based. If Therine is based then Therine is redbrick. Arly is young.", "logic": "\nUnexciting(therine)\nSynthetic(therine)\nInterstate(therine)\nBased(therine)\nRedbrick(therine)\nUnratable(therine)\nRedbrick(arly)\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) -> Unexciting(x))\nforall x (Interstate(x) and Redbrick(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nforall x (Based(x) -> Interstate(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) -> Based(x))\nBased(therine) -> Redbrick(therine)\n\nYoung(arly)\n\nYoung(arly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Maddalena is antlered. Rajeev is dehydrated. Rajeev is paroxysmal. Norwood is fitted. Norwood is paroxysmal. Norwood is triploid. Marwin is urgent. If Marwin is triploid and Marwin is antlered then Marwin is dehydrated. If someone is fitted then they are clubbish. If Marwin is paroxysmal then Marwin is antlered. All fitted, clubbish people are urgent. Cold people are clubbish. All clubbish people are dehydrated. Red, dehydrated people are clubbish. White people are antlered. Maddalena is antlered.", "logic": "\nAntlered(maddalena)\nDehydrated(rajeev)\nParoxysmal(rajeev)\nFitted(norwood)\nParoxysmal(norwood)\nTriploid(norwood)\nUrgent(marwin)\nTriploid(marwin) and Antlered(marwin) -> Dehydrated(marwin)\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nParoxysmal(marwin) -> Antlered(marwin)\nforall x (Fitted(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Urgent(x))\nforall x (Dehydrated(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Dehydrated(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) and Dehydrated(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Antlered(x))\n\nAntlered(maddalena)\n\ntherefore Antlered(maddalena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Tabitha is hospitable. Juana is levantine. Juana is dimorphous. Annalise is going. Annalise is dimorphous. Annalise is contracted. Dusty is statuesque. If Dusty is contracted and Dusty is hospitable then Dusty is levantine. If someone is going then they are close. If Dusty is dimorphous then Dusty is hospitable. All going, close people are statuesque. Cold people are close. All close people are levantine. Red, levantine people are close. White people are hospitable. Tabitha is not hospitable.", "logic": "\nHospitable(tabitha)\nLevantine(juana)\nDimorphous(juana)\nGoing(annalise)\nDimorphous(annalise)\nContracted(annalise)\nStatuesque(dusty)\nContracted(dusty) and Hospitable(dusty) -> Levantine(dusty)\nforall x (Going(x) -> Close(x))\nDimorphous(dusty) -> Hospitable(dusty)\nforall x (Going(x) and Close(x) -> Statuesque(x))\nforall x (Levantine(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Close(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Going(x) and Levantine(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> Hospitable(x))\n\nnot Hospitable(tabitha)\n\ntherefore Hospitable(tabitha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Desdemona is amylaceous. Gwendolin is indusial. Gwendolin is unilateral. Tamma is nonrigid. Tamma is unilateral. Tamma is laurelled. Whitney is speedy. If Whitney is laurelled and Whitney is amylaceous then Whitney is indusial. If someone is nonrigid then they are untaxed. If Whitney is unilateral then Whitney is amylaceous. All nonrigid, untaxed people are speedy. Cold people are untaxed. All untaxed people are indusial. Red, indusial people are untaxed. White people are amylaceous. Whitney is amylaceous.", "logic": "\nAmylaceous(desdemona)\nIndusial(gwendolin)\nUnilateral(gwendolin)\nNonrigid(tamma)\nUnilateral(tamma)\nLaurelled(tamma)\nSpeedy(whitney)\nLaurelled(whitney) and Amylaceous(whitney) -> Indusial(whitney)\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) -> Untaxed(x))\nUnilateral(whitney) -> Amylaceous(whitney)\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Speedy(x))\nforall x (Indusial(x) -> Untaxed(x))\nforall x (Untaxed(x) -> Indusial(x))\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) and Indusial(x) -> Untaxed(x))\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\n\nAmylaceous(whitney)\n\nSpeedy(whitney) and forall x (Speedy(x) -> Amylaceous(x)) -> therefore Amylaceous(whitney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Onida is ulcerative. Nanete is condolent. Nanete is cheerless. Ethyl is crumbly. Ethyl is cheerless. Ethyl is gamy. Marjy is tactical. If Marjy is gamy and Marjy is ulcerative then Marjy is condolent. If someone is crumbly then they are clashing. If Marjy is cheerless then Marjy is ulcerative. All crumbly, clashing people are tactical. Cold people are clashing. All clashing people are condolent. Red, condolent people are clashing. White people are ulcerative. Ethyl is not clashing.", "logic": "\nUlcerative(onida)\nCondolent(nanete)\nCheerless(nanete)\nCrumbly(ethyl)\nCheerless(ethyl)\nGamy(ethyl)\nTactical(marjy)\nGamy(marjy) and Ulcerative(marjy) -> Condolent(marjy)\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Clashing(x))\nCheerless(marjy) -> Ulcerative(marjy)\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Clashing(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Condolent(x) -> Clashing(x))\nforall x (Clashing(x) -> Condolent(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Condolent(x) -> Clashing(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\n\nnot Clashing(ethyl)\n\nCrumbly(ethyl) and forall x (Crumbly(x) -> Clashing(x)) -> therefore Clashing(ethyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Caron is alight. Issy is truncate. Issy is cynical. Sonia is practiced. Sonia is cynical. Sonia is etiolate. Merlina is implicated. If Merlina is etiolate and Merlina is alight then Merlina is truncate. If someone is practiced then they are haywire. If Merlina is cynical then Merlina is alight. All practiced, haywire people are implicated. Cold people are haywire. All haywire people are truncate. Red, truncate people are haywire. White people are alight. Sonia is truncate.", "logic": "\nAlight(caron)\nTruncate(issy)\nCynical(issy)\nPracticed(sonia)\nCynical(sonia)\nEtiolate(sonia)\nImplicated(merlina)\nEtiolate(merlina) and Alight(merlina) -> Truncate(merlina)\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Haywire(x))\nCynical(merlina) -> Alight(merlina)\nforall x (Practiced(x) and Haywire(x) -> Implicated(x))\nforall x (Truncate(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Truncate(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) and Truncate(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Alight(x))\n\nTruncate(sonia)\n\nPracticed(sonia) and forall x (Practiced(x) -> Haywire(x)) -> therefore Haywire(sonia) Haywire(sonia) and forall x (Haywire(x) -> Truncate(x)) -> therefore Truncate(sonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Nellie is feigned. Fanya is retrograde. Fanya is cultural. Leoline is plutonic. Leoline is cultural. Leoline is hunted. Rab is timely. If Rab is hunted and Rab is feigned then Rab is retrograde. If someone is plutonic then they are bandy. If Rab is cultural then Rab is feigned. All plutonic, bandy people are timely. Cold people are bandy. All bandy people are retrograde. Red, retrograde people are bandy. White people are feigned. Leoline is not timely.", "logic": "\nFeigned(nellie)\nRetrograde(fanya)\nCultural(fanya)\nPlutonic(leoline)\nCultural(leoline)\nHunted(leoline)\nTimely(rab)\nHunted(rab) and Feigned(rab) -> Retrograde(rab)\nforall x (Plutonic(x) -> Bandy(x))\nCultural(rab) -> Feigned(rab)\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Bandy(x) -> Timely(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) -> Bandy(x))\nforall x (Bandy(x) -> Retrograde(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Retrograde(x) -> Bandy(x))\nforall x (Timely(x) -> Feigned(x))\n\nnot Timely(leoline)\n\nPlutonic(leoline) and forall x (Plutonic(x) -> Bandy(x)) -> therefore Bandy(leoline) Plutonic(leoline) and Bandy(leoline) and forall x (Plutonic(x) and Bandy(x) -> Timely(x)) -> therefore Timely(leoline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Jonell is wildcat. Rolph is preeminent. Rolph is magnified. Neile is nosocomial. Neile is magnified. Neile is headlong. Odessa is imperial. If Odessa is headlong and Odessa is wildcat then Odessa is preeminent. If someone is nosocomial then they are subject. If Odessa is magnified then Odessa is wildcat. All nosocomial, subject people are imperial. Cold people are subject. All subject people are preeminent. Red, preeminent people are subject. White people are wildcat. Neile is wildcat.", "logic": "\nWildcat(jonell)\nPreeminent(rolph)\nMagnified(rolph)\nNosocomial(neile)\nMagnified(neile)\nHeadlong(neile)\nImperial(odessa)\nHeadlong(odessa) and Wildcat(odessa) -> Preeminent(odessa)\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) -> Subject(x))\nMagnified(odessa) -> Wildcat(odessa)\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and Subject(x) -> Imperial(x))\nforall x (Preeminent(x) -> Subject(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Preeminent(x))\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and Preeminent(x) -> Subject(x))\nforall x (Imperial(x) -> Wildcat(x))\n\nWildcat(neile)\n\nNosocomial(neile) and forall x (Nosocomial(x) -> Subject(x)) -> therefore Subject(neile) Nosocomial(neile) and Subject(neile) and forall x (Nosocomial(x) and Subject(x) -> Imperial(x)) -> therefore Imperial(neile) Imperial(neile) and forall x (Imperial(x) -> Wildcat(x)) -> therefore Wildcat(neile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Lucita is aboral. Dillon is elongate. Dillon is unitarian. Carlita is busted. Carlita is unitarian. Carlita is fuggy. Douggie is pastoral. If Douggie is fuggy and Douggie is aboral then Douggie is elongate. If someone is busted then they are meshugge. If Douggie is unitarian then Douggie is aboral. All busted, meshugge people are pastoral. Cold people are meshugge. All meshugge people are elongate. Red, elongate people are meshugge. White people are aboral. Carlita is not aboral.", "logic": "\nAboral(lucita)\nElongate(dillon)\nUnitarian(dillon)\nBusted(carlita)\nUnitarian(carlita)\nFuggy(carlita)\nPastoral(douggie)\nFuggy(douggie) and Aboral(douggie) -> Elongate(douggie)\nforall x (Busted(x) -> Meshugge(x))\nUnitarian(douggie) -> Aboral(douggie)\nforall x (Busted(x) and Meshugge(x) -> Pastoral(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) -> Meshugge(x))\nforall x (Meshugge(x) -> Elongate(x))\nforall x (Busted(x) and Elongate(x) -> Meshugge(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) -> Aboral(x))\n\nnot Aboral(carlita)\n\nBusted(carlita) and forall x (Busted(x) -> Meshugge(x)) -> therefore Meshugge(carlita) Busted(carlita) and Meshugge(carlita) and forall x (Busted(x) and Meshugge(x) -> Pastoral(x)) -> therefore Pastoral(carlita) Pastoral(carlita) and forall x (Pastoral(x) -> Aboral(x)) -> therefore Aboral(carlita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Jaleh is ravaging. Lust is overjoyed. Lust is requisite. Torrin is formal. Torrin is requisite. Torrin is hairlike. Salim is wonderful. If Salim is hairlike and Salim is ravaging then Salim is overjoyed. If someone is formal then they are wilsonian. If Salim is requisite then Salim is ravaging. All formal, wilsonian people are wonderful. Cold people are wilsonian. All wilsonian people are overjoyed. Red, overjoyed people are wilsonian. White people are ravaging. Jaleh is not wilsonian.", "logic": "\nRavaging(jaleh)\nOverjoyed(lust)\nRequisite(lust)\nFormal(torrin)\nRequisite(torrin)\nHairlike(torrin)\nWonderful(salim)\nHairlike(salim) and Ravaging(salim) -> Overjoyed(salim)\nforall x (Formal(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\nRequisite(salim) -> Ravaging(salim)\nforall x (Formal(x) and Wilsonian(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\nforall x (Wilsonian(x) -> Overjoyed(x))\nforall x (Formal(x) and Overjoyed(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) -> Ravaging(x))\n\nnot Wilsonian(jaleh)\n\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) -> Wilsonian(x)) <- forall x (Wilsonian(x) -> Overjoyed(x)) <- forall x (Formal(x) -> Wilsonian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Anitra is woollen. Tabbatha is howling. Tabbatha is maxi. Jere is rubbishy. Jere is maxi. Jere is palatal. Caryn is retarded. If Caryn is palatal and Caryn is woollen then Caryn is howling. If someone is rubbishy then they are uneatable. If Caryn is maxi then Caryn is woollen. All rubbishy, uneatable people are retarded. Cold people are uneatable. All uneatable people are howling. Red, howling people are uneatable. White people are woollen. Tabbatha is woollen.", "logic": "\nWoollen(anitra)\nHowling(tabbatha)\nMaxi(tabbatha)\nRubbishy(jere)\nMaxi(jere)\nPalatal(jere)\nRetarded(caryn)\nPalatal(caryn) and Woollen(caryn) -> Howling(caryn)\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) -> Uneatable(x))\nMaxi(caryn) -> Woollen(caryn)\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) and Uneatable(x) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Howling(x) -> Uneatable(x))\nforall x (Uneatable(x) -> Howling(x))\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) and Howling(x) -> Uneatable(x))\nforall x (Retarded(x) -> Woollen(x))\n\nWoollen(tabbatha)\n\nforall x (Retarded(x) -> Woollen(x)) <- forall x (Rubbishy(x) and Uneatable(x) -> Retarded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Hendrick is curly. Clarissa is semiarid. Clarissa is sissy. Othilia is secure. Othilia is sissy. Othilia is metric. Adara is paralyzed. If Adara is metric and Adara is curly then Adara is semiarid. If someone is secure then they are twee. If Adara is sissy then Adara is curly. All secure, twee people are paralyzed. Cold people are twee. All twee people are semiarid. Red, semiarid people are twee. White people are curly. Adara is not twee.", "logic": "\nCurly(hendrick)\nSemiarid(clarissa)\nSissy(clarissa)\nSecure(othilia)\nSissy(othilia)\nMetric(othilia)\nParalyzed(adara)\nMetric(adara) and Curly(adara) -> Semiarid(adara)\nforall x (Secure(x) -> Twee(x))\nSissy(adara) -> Curly(adara)\nforall x (Secure(x) and Twee(x) -> Paralyzed(x))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Twee(x) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Secure(x) and Semiarid(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> Curly(x))\n\nnot Twee(adara)\n\nforall x (Semiarid(x) -> Twee(x)) <- forall x (Twee(x) -> Semiarid(x)) <- forall x (Secure(x) -> Twee(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Yovonnda is insatiate. Philip is compulsory. Philip is topknotted. Judy is constant. Judy is topknotted. Judy is southerly. Cara is invaluable. If Cara is southerly and Cara is insatiate then Cara is compulsory. If someone is constant then they are carmine. If Cara is topknotted then Cara is insatiate. All constant, carmine people are invaluable. Cold people are carmine. All carmine people are compulsory. Red, compulsory people are carmine. White people are insatiate. Yovonnda is invaluable.", "logic": "\nInsatiate(yovonnda)\nCompulsory(philip)\nTopknotted(philip)\nConstant(judy)\nTopknotted(judy)\nSoutherly(judy)\nInvaluable(cara)\nSoutherly(cara) and Insatiate(cara) -> Compulsory(cara)\nforall x (Constant(x) -> Carmine(x))\nTopknotted(cara) -> Insatiate(cara)\nforall x (Constant(x) and Carmine(x) -> Invaluable(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Carmine(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) and Compulsory(x) -> Carmine(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Insatiate(x))\n\nInvaluable(yovonnda)\n\nforall x (Constant(x) and Carmine(x) -> Invaluable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Benedetta is hearsay. Krissy is audenesque. Krissy is blurred. Robert is blithesome. Robert is blurred. Robert is plumbable. Jasmina is senegalese. If Jasmina is plumbable and Jasmina is hearsay then Jasmina is audenesque. If someone is blithesome then they are worshipful. If Jasmina is blurred then Jasmina is hearsay. All blithesome, worshipful people are senegalese. Cold people are worshipful. All worshipful people are audenesque. Red, audenesque people are worshipful. White people are hearsay. Krissy is not blithesome.", "logic": "\nHearsay(benedetta)\nAudenesque(krissy)\nBlurred(krissy)\nBlithesome(robert)\nBlurred(robert)\nPlumbable(robert)\nSenegalese(jasmina)\nPlumbable(jasmina) and Hearsay(jasmina) -> Audenesque(jasmina)\nforall x (Blithesome(x) -> Worshipful(x))\nBlurred(jasmina) -> Hearsay(jasmina)\nforall x (Blithesome(x) and Worshipful(x) -> Senegalese(x))\nforall x (Audenesque(x) -> Worshipful(x))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Audenesque(x))\nforall x (Blithesome(x) and Audenesque(x) -> Worshipful(x))\nforall x (Senegalese(x) -> Hearsay(x))\n\nnot Blithesome(krissy)\n\nnot Blithesome(krissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Ronda is atactic. Ware is fulgurous. Ware is lowered. Carmela is festive. Carmela is lowered. Carmela is defective. Mady is genetical. If Mady is defective and Mady is atactic then Mady is fulgurous. If someone is festive then they are chatty. If Mady is lowered then Mady is atactic. All festive, chatty people are genetical. Cold people are chatty. All chatty people are fulgurous. Red, fulgurous people are chatty. White people are atactic. Ronda is lowered.", "logic": "\nAtactic(ronda)\nFulgurous(ware)\nLowered(ware)\nFestive(carmela)\nLowered(carmela)\nDefective(carmela)\nGenetical(mady)\nDefective(mady) and Atactic(mady) -> Fulgurous(mady)\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Chatty(x))\nLowered(mady) -> Atactic(mady)\nforall x (Festive(x) and Chatty(x) -> Genetical(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Chatty(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Fulgurous(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) and Fulgurous(x) -> Chatty(x))\nforall x (Genetical(x) -> Atactic(x))\n\nLowered(ronda)\n\nLowered(ronda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Chester is unspoken. Elie is actual. Elie is opened. Sarena is paid. Sarena is opened. Sarena is aculeated. Ivy is atheist. If Ivy is aculeated and Ivy is unspoken then Ivy is actual. If someone is paid then they are aerobic. If Ivy is opened then Ivy is unspoken. All paid, aerobic people are atheist. Cold people are aerobic. All aerobic people are actual. Red, actual people are aerobic. White people are unspoken. Ivy is not paid.", "logic": "\nUnspoken(chester)\nActual(elie)\nOpened(elie)\nPaid(sarena)\nOpened(sarena)\nAculeated(sarena)\nAtheist(ivy)\nAculeated(ivy) and Unspoken(ivy) -> Actual(ivy)\nforall x (Paid(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nOpened(ivy) -> Unspoken(ivy)\nforall x (Paid(x) and Aerobic(x) -> Atheist(x))\nforall x (Actual(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Actual(x))\nforall x (Paid(x) and Actual(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Unspoken(x))\n\nnot Paid(ivy)\n\nnot Paid(ivy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Zonnya is shortish. Ferguson is bloodless. Ferguson is clxxx. Rahal is couth. Rahal is clxxx. Rahal is worthy. Reube is payable. If Reube is worthy and Reube is shortish then Reube is bloodless. If someone is couth then they are shapely. If Reube is clxxx then Reube is shortish. All couth, shapely people are payable. Cold people are shapely. All shapely people are bloodless. Red, bloodless people are shapely. White people are shortish. Zonnya is worthy.", "logic": "\nShortish(zonnya)\nBloodless(ferguson)\nClxxx(ferguson)\nCouth(rahal)\nClxxx(rahal)\nWorthy(rahal)\nPayable(reube)\nWorthy(reube) and Shortish(reube) -> Bloodless(reube)\nforall x (Couth(x) -> Shapely(x))\nClxxx(reube) -> Shortish(reube)\nforall x (Couth(x) and Shapely(x) -> Payable(x))\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Shapely(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Couth(x) and Bloodless(x) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Shortish(x))\n\nWorthy(zonnya)\n\nWorthy(zonnya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Marie is obdurate. Marie is deserted. Marie is cliched. Marie is reverse. Marie is assertable. Marie is curable. Marie is unaired. Jodie is obdurate. Jodie is deserted. Jodie is cliched. Jodie is reverse. Jodie is curable. Jodie is unaired. Ross is reverse. Ross is unaired. If something is reverse then it is obdurate. Blue, obdurate things are assertable. Cold, obdurate things are assertable. If something is curable then it is unaired. If Jodie is unaired and Jodie is reverse then Jodie is obdurate. All unaired, cliched things are assertable. All curable, assertable things are unaired. All obdurate, unaired things are cliched. Jodie is cliched.", "logic": "\nObdurate(marie)\nDeserted(marie)\nCliched(marie)\nReverse(marie)\nAssertable(marie)\nCurable(marie)\nUnaired(marie)\nObdurate(jodie)\nDeserted(jodie)\nCliched(jodie)\nReverse(jodie)\nCurable(jodie)\nUnaired(jodie)\nReverse(ross)\nUnaired(ross)\nforall x (Reverse(x) -> Obdurate(x))\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Obdurate(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Obdurate(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Curable(x) -> Unaired(x))\nUnaired(jodie) and Reverse(jodie) -> Obdurate(jodie)\nforall x (Unaired(x) and Cliched(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Curable(x) and Assertable(x) -> Unaired(x))\nforall x (Obdurate(x) and Unaired(x) -> Cliched(x))\n\nCliched(jodie)\n\ntherefore Cliched(jodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Christine is chinked. Christine is spiteful. Christine is congeneric. Christine is dionysian. Christine is southmost. Christine is foppish. Christine is convulsive. Norri is chinked. Norri is spiteful. Norri is congeneric. Norri is dionysian. Norri is foppish. Norri is convulsive. Tersina is dionysian. Tersina is convulsive. If something is dionysian then it is chinked. Blue, chinked things are southmost. Cold, chinked things are southmost. If something is foppish then it is convulsive. If Norri is convulsive and Norri is dionysian then Norri is chinked. All convulsive, congeneric things are southmost. All foppish, southmost things are convulsive. All chinked, convulsive things are congeneric. Norri is not foppish.", "logic": "\nChinked(christine)\nSpiteful(christine)\nCongeneric(christine)\nDionysian(christine)\nSouthmost(christine)\nFoppish(christine)\nConvulsive(christine)\nChinked(norri)\nSpiteful(norri)\nCongeneric(norri)\nDionysian(norri)\nFoppish(norri)\nConvulsive(norri)\nDionysian(tersina)\nConvulsive(tersina)\nforall x (Dionysian(x) -> Chinked(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) and Chinked(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Congeneric(x) and Chinked(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Foppish(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nConvulsive(norri) and Dionysian(norri) -> Chinked(norri)\nforall x (Convulsive(x) and Congeneric(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Foppish(x) and Southmost(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nforall x (Chinked(x) and Convulsive(x) -> Congeneric(x))\n\nnot Foppish(norri)\n\ntherefore Foppish(norri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Elka is thundery. Elka is deformed. Elka is metabolic. Elka is unrentable. Elka is malapropos. Elka is autoicous. Elka is rolling. Rhodie is thundery. Rhodie is deformed. Rhodie is metabolic. Rhodie is unrentable. Rhodie is autoicous. Rhodie is rolling. Sayre is unrentable. Sayre is rolling. If something is unrentable then it is thundery. Blue, thundery things are malapropos. Cold, thundery things are malapropos. If something is autoicous then it is rolling. If Rhodie is rolling and Rhodie is unrentable then Rhodie is thundery. All rolling, metabolic things are malapropos. All autoicous, malapropos things are rolling. All thundery, rolling things are metabolic. Sayre is thundery.", "logic": "\nThundery(elka)\nDeformed(elka)\nMetabolic(elka)\nUnrentable(elka)\nMalapropos(elka)\nAutoicous(elka)\nRolling(elka)\nThundery(rhodie)\nDeformed(rhodie)\nMetabolic(rhodie)\nUnrentable(rhodie)\nAutoicous(rhodie)\nRolling(rhodie)\nUnrentable(sayre)\nRolling(sayre)\nforall x (Unrentable(x) -> Thundery(x))\nforall x (Deformed(x) and Thundery(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Thundery(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Autoicous(x) -> Rolling(x))\nRolling(rhodie) and Unrentable(rhodie) -> Thundery(rhodie)\nforall x (Rolling(x) and Metabolic(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Autoicous(x) and Malapropos(x) -> Rolling(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Rolling(x) -> Metabolic(x))\n\nThundery(sayre)\n\nUnrentable(sayre) and forall x (Unrentable(x) -> Thundery(x)) -> therefore Thundery(sayre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Jordan is traumatic. Jordan is connate. Jordan is lxii. Jordan is elflike. Jordan is marginal. Jordan is scrotal. Jordan is ticklish. Caterina is traumatic. Caterina is connate. Caterina is lxii. Caterina is elflike. Caterina is scrotal. Caterina is ticklish. Kermie is elflike. Kermie is ticklish. If something is elflike then it is traumatic. Blue, traumatic things are marginal. Cold, traumatic things are marginal. If something is scrotal then it is ticklish. If Caterina is ticklish and Caterina is elflike then Caterina is traumatic. All ticklish, lxii things are marginal. All scrotal, marginal things are ticklish. All traumatic, ticklish things are lxii. Kermie is not traumatic.", "logic": "\nTraumatic(jordan)\nConnate(jordan)\nLxii(jordan)\nElflike(jordan)\nMarginal(jordan)\nScrotal(jordan)\nTicklish(jordan)\nTraumatic(caterina)\nConnate(caterina)\nLxii(caterina)\nElflike(caterina)\nScrotal(caterina)\nTicklish(caterina)\nElflike(kermie)\nTicklish(kermie)\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Traumatic(x))\nforall x (Connate(x) and Traumatic(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Lxii(x) and Traumatic(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> Ticklish(x))\nTicklish(caterina) and Elflike(caterina) -> Traumatic(caterina)\nforall x (Ticklish(x) and Lxii(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) and Marginal(x) -> Ticklish(x))\nforall x (Traumatic(x) and Ticklish(x) -> Lxii(x))\n\nnot Traumatic(kermie)\n\nElflike(kermie) and forall x (Elflike(x) -> Traumatic(x)) -> therefore Traumatic(kermie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Lonny is enviable. Lonny is remittent. Lonny is ennobling. Lonny is verbalized. Lonny is tottering. Lonny is bountied. Lonny is luckless. Forster is enviable. Forster is remittent. Forster is ennobling. Forster is verbalized. Forster is bountied. Forster is luckless. Reiko is verbalized. Reiko is luckless. If something is verbalized then it is enviable. Blue, enviable things are tottering. Cold, enviable things are tottering. If something is bountied then it is luckless. If Forster is luckless and Forster is verbalized then Forster is enviable. All luckless, ennobling things are tottering. All bountied, tottering things are luckless. All enviable, luckless things are ennobling. Reiko is ennobling.", "logic": "\nEnviable(lonny)\nRemittent(lonny)\nEnnobling(lonny)\nVerbalized(lonny)\nTottering(lonny)\nBountied(lonny)\nLuckless(lonny)\nEnviable(forster)\nRemittent(forster)\nEnnobling(forster)\nVerbalized(forster)\nBountied(forster)\nLuckless(forster)\nVerbalized(reiko)\nLuckless(reiko)\nforall x (Verbalized(x) -> Enviable(x))\nforall x (Remittent(x) and Enviable(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) and Enviable(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Bountied(x) -> Luckless(x))\nLuckless(forster) and Verbalized(forster) -> Enviable(forster)\nforall x (Luckless(x) and Ennobling(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Bountied(x) and Tottering(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Enviable(x) and Luckless(x) -> Ennobling(x))\n\nEnnobling(reiko)\n\nVerbalized(reiko) and forall x (Verbalized(x) -> Enviable(x)) -> therefore Enviable(reiko) Enviable(reiko) and Luckless(reiko) and forall x (Enviable(x) and Luckless(x) -> Ennobling(x)) -> therefore Ennobling(reiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Noel is chlamydial. Noel is archean. Noel is mouthless. Noel is lean. Noel is peccable. Noel is tinkling. Noel is aphasic. Letitia is chlamydial. Letitia is archean. Letitia is mouthless. Letitia is lean. Letitia is tinkling. Letitia is aphasic. Rochelle is lean. Rochelle is aphasic. If something is lean then it is chlamydial. Blue, chlamydial things are peccable. Cold, chlamydial things are peccable. If something is tinkling then it is aphasic. If Letitia is aphasic and Letitia is lean then Letitia is chlamydial. All aphasic, mouthless things are peccable. All tinkling, peccable things are aphasic. All chlamydial, aphasic things are mouthless. Rochelle is not mouthless.", "logic": "\nChlamydial(noel)\nArchean(noel)\nMouthless(noel)\nLean(noel)\nPeccable(noel)\nTinkling(noel)\nAphasic(noel)\nChlamydial(letitia)\nArchean(letitia)\nMouthless(letitia)\nLean(letitia)\nTinkling(letitia)\nAphasic(letitia)\nLean(rochelle)\nAphasic(rochelle)\nforall x (Lean(x) -> Chlamydial(x))\nforall x (Archean(x) and Chlamydial(x) -> Peccable(x))\nforall x (Mouthless(x) and Chlamydial(x) -> Peccable(x))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Aphasic(x))\nAphasic(letitia) and Lean(letitia) -> Chlamydial(letitia)\nforall x (Aphasic(x) and Mouthless(x) -> Peccable(x))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) and Peccable(x) -> Aphasic(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) and Aphasic(x) -> Mouthless(x))\n\nnot Mouthless(rochelle)\n\nLean(rochelle) and forall x (Lean(x) -> Chlamydial(x)) -> therefore Chlamydial(rochelle) Chlamydial(rochelle) and Aphasic(rochelle) and forall x (Chlamydial(x) and Aphasic(x) -> Mouthless(x)) -> therefore Mouthless(rochelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Elene is scaly. Elene is devious. Elene is tsaristic. Elene is unthankful. Elene is lupine. Elene is upmost. Elene is manorial. Brana is scaly. Brana is devious. Brana is tsaristic. Brana is unthankful. Brana is upmost. Brana is manorial. Ahmet is unthankful. Ahmet is manorial. If something is unthankful then it is scaly. Blue, scaly things are lupine. Cold, scaly things are lupine. If something is upmost then it is manorial. If Brana is manorial and Brana is unthankful then Brana is scaly. All manorial, tsaristic things are lupine. All upmost, lupine things are manorial. All scaly, manorial things are tsaristic. Ahmet is lupine.", "logic": "\nScaly(elene)\nDevious(elene)\nTsaristic(elene)\nUnthankful(elene)\nLupine(elene)\nUpmost(elene)\nManorial(elene)\nScaly(brana)\nDevious(brana)\nTsaristic(brana)\nUnthankful(brana)\nUpmost(brana)\nManorial(brana)\nUnthankful(ahmet)\nManorial(ahmet)\nforall x (Unthankful(x) -> Scaly(x))\nforall x (Devious(x) and Scaly(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and Scaly(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Upmost(x) -> Manorial(x))\nManorial(brana) and Unthankful(brana) -> Scaly(brana)\nforall x (Manorial(x) and Tsaristic(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Upmost(x) and Lupine(x) -> Manorial(x))\nforall x (Scaly(x) and Manorial(x) -> Tsaristic(x))\n\nLupine(ahmet)\n\nUnthankful(ahmet) and forall x (Unthankful(x) -> Scaly(x)) -> therefore Scaly(ahmet) Scaly(ahmet) and Manorial(ahmet) and forall x (Scaly(x) and Manorial(x) -> Tsaristic(x)) -> therefore Tsaristic(ahmet) Manorial(ahmet) and Tsaristic(ahmet) and forall x (Manorial(x) and Tsaristic(x) -> Lupine(x)) -> therefore Lupine(ahmet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Vanni is fevered. Vanni is headstrong. Vanni is reportable. Vanni is unthawed. Vanni is yogistic. Vanni is jerking. Vanni is trilateral. Huntley is fevered. Huntley is headstrong. Huntley is reportable. Huntley is unthawed. Huntley is jerking. Huntley is trilateral. Janith is unthawed. Janith is trilateral. If something is unthawed then it is fevered. Blue, fevered things are yogistic. Cold, fevered things are yogistic. If something is jerking then it is trilateral. If Huntley is trilateral and Huntley is unthawed then Huntley is fevered. All trilateral, reportable things are yogistic. All jerking, yogistic things are trilateral. All fevered, trilateral things are reportable. Janith is not yogistic.", "logic": "\nFevered(vanni)\nHeadstrong(vanni)\nReportable(vanni)\nUnthawed(vanni)\nYogistic(vanni)\nJerking(vanni)\nTrilateral(vanni)\nFevered(huntley)\nHeadstrong(huntley)\nReportable(huntley)\nUnthawed(huntley)\nJerking(huntley)\nTrilateral(huntley)\nUnthawed(janith)\nTrilateral(janith)\nforall x (Unthawed(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Headstrong(x) and Fevered(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Reportable(x) and Fevered(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Jerking(x) -> Trilateral(x))\nTrilateral(huntley) and Unthawed(huntley) -> Fevered(huntley)\nforall x (Trilateral(x) and Reportable(x) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Jerking(x) and Yogistic(x) -> Trilateral(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) and Trilateral(x) -> Reportable(x))\n\nnot Yogistic(janith)\n\nUnthawed(janith) and forall x (Unthawed(x) -> Fevered(x)) -> therefore Fevered(janith) Fevered(janith) and Trilateral(janith) and forall x (Fevered(x) and Trilateral(x) -> Reportable(x)) -> therefore Reportable(janith) Trilateral(janith) and Reportable(janith) and forall x (Trilateral(x) and Reportable(x) -> Yogistic(x)) -> therefore Yogistic(janith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Zonda is inclusive. Zonda is raucous. Zonda is chipper. Zonda is autistic. Zonda is unburdened. Zonda is plural. Zonda is zenithal. Del is inclusive. Del is raucous. Del is chipper. Del is autistic. Del is plural. Del is zenithal. Lucienne is autistic. Lucienne is zenithal. If something is autistic then it is inclusive. Blue, inclusive things are unburdened. Cold, inclusive things are unburdened. If something is plural then it is zenithal. If Del is zenithal and Del is autistic then Del is inclusive. All zenithal, chipper things are unburdened. All plural, unburdened things are zenithal. All inclusive, zenithal things are chipper. Lucienne is not raucous.", "logic": "\nInclusive(zonda)\nRaucous(zonda)\nChipper(zonda)\nAutistic(zonda)\nUnburdened(zonda)\nPlural(zonda)\nZenithal(zonda)\nInclusive(del)\nRaucous(del)\nChipper(del)\nAutistic(del)\nPlural(del)\nZenithal(del)\nAutistic(lucienne)\nZenithal(lucienne)\nforall x (Autistic(x) -> Inclusive(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Unburdened(x))\nforall x (Chipper(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Unburdened(x))\nforall x (Plural(x) -> Zenithal(x))\nZenithal(del) and Autistic(del) -> Inclusive(del)\nforall x (Zenithal(x) and Chipper(x) -> Unburdened(x))\nforall x (Plural(x) and Unburdened(x) -> Zenithal(x))\nforall x (Inclusive(x) and Zenithal(x) -> Chipper(x))\n\nnot Raucous(lucienne)\n\nnot Raucous(lucienne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Lian is bugged. Lian is triplex. Lian is cushioned. Lian is depicted. Lian is sparing. Lian is knowing. Lian is barefaced. Missy is bugged. Missy is triplex. Missy is cushioned. Missy is depicted. Missy is knowing. Missy is barefaced. Anatoly is depicted. Anatoly is barefaced. If something is depicted then it is bugged. Blue, bugged things are sparing. Cold, bugged things are sparing. If something is knowing then it is barefaced. If Missy is barefaced and Missy is depicted then Missy is bugged. All barefaced, cushioned things are sparing. All knowing, sparing things are barefaced. All bugged, barefaced things are cushioned. Anatoly is knowing.", "logic": "\nBugged(lian)\nTriplex(lian)\nCushioned(lian)\nDepicted(lian)\nSparing(lian)\nKnowing(lian)\nBarefaced(lian)\nBugged(missy)\nTriplex(missy)\nCushioned(missy)\nDepicted(missy)\nKnowing(missy)\nBarefaced(missy)\nDepicted(anatoly)\nBarefaced(anatoly)\nforall x (Depicted(x) -> Bugged(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) and Bugged(x) -> Sparing(x))\nforall x (Cushioned(x) and Bugged(x) -> Sparing(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Barefaced(x))\nBarefaced(missy) and Depicted(missy) -> Bugged(missy)\nforall x (Barefaced(x) and Cushioned(x) -> Sparing(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) and Sparing(x) -> Barefaced(x))\nforall x (Bugged(x) and Barefaced(x) -> Cushioned(x))\n\nKnowing(anatoly)\n\nKnowing(anatoly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Hirsch is buxom. Arther is egocentric. Eloise is not uninitiate. All egocentric things are augitic. All juvenile, portrayed things are augitic. If something is augitic then it is humpbacked. If something is uninitiate and not buxom then it is not humpbacked. If something is buxom then it is egocentric. If something is uninitiate and not buxom then it is egocentric. If something is egocentric and not uninitiate then it is not juvenile. If something is uninitiate then it is juvenile. Hirsch is buxom.", "logic": "\nBuxom(hirsch)\nEgocentric(arther)\nnot Uninitiate(eloise)\nforall x (Egocentric(x) -> Augitic(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) and Portrayed(x) -> Augitic(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) and not Buxom(x) -> not Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Buxom(x) -> Egocentric(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) and not Buxom(x) -> Egocentric(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and not Uninitiate(x) -> not Juvenile(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Juvenile(x))\n\nBuxom(hirsch)\n\ntherefore Buxom(hirsch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Laverne is normative. Morly is grasslike. Merola is not analogue. All grasslike things are rupestral. All crafty, spacious things are rupestral. If something is rupestral then it is both. If something is analogue and not normative then it is not both. If something is normative then it is grasslike. If something is analogue and not normative then it is grasslike. If something is grasslike and not analogue then it is not crafty. If something is analogue then it is crafty. Laverne is not normative.", "logic": "\nNormative(laverne)\nGrasslike(morly)\nnot Analogue(merola)\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Crafty(x) and Spacious(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Rupestral(x) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Analogue(x) and not Normative(x) -> not Both(x))\nforall x (Normative(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Analogue(x) and not Normative(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) and not Analogue(x) -> not Crafty(x))\nforall x (Analogue(x) -> Crafty(x))\n\nnot Normative(laverne)\n\ntherefore Normative(laverne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Rodge is arminian. Eleanore is crafty. Charisse is not leakproof. All crafty things are multistory. All flowering, calceiform things are multistory. If something is multistory then it is derisory. If something is leakproof and not arminian then it is not derisory. If something is arminian then it is crafty. If something is leakproof and not arminian then it is crafty. If something is crafty and not leakproof then it is not flowering. If something is leakproof then it is flowering. Rodge is crafty.", "logic": "\nArminian(rodge)\nCrafty(eleanore)\nnot Leakproof(charisse)\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Flowering(x) and Calceiform(x) -> Multistory(x))\nforall x (Multistory(x) -> Derisory(x))\nforall x (Leakproof(x) and not Arminian(x) -> not Derisory(x))\nforall x (Arminian(x) -> Crafty(x))\nforall x (Leakproof(x) and not Arminian(x) -> Crafty(x))\nforall x (Crafty(x) and not Leakproof(x) -> not Flowering(x))\nforall x (Leakproof(x) -> Flowering(x))\n\nCrafty(rodge)\n\nArminian(rodge) and forall x (Arminian(x) -> Crafty(x)) -> therefore Crafty(rodge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Ramesh is squiggly. Tia is profuse. Martino is not plucky. All profuse things are senecan. All nominal, pneumatic things are senecan. If something is senecan then it is raining. If something is plucky and not squiggly then it is not raining. If something is squiggly then it is profuse. If something is plucky and not squiggly then it is profuse. If something is profuse and not plucky then it is not nominal. If something is plucky then it is nominal. Tia is not senecan.", "logic": "\nSquiggly(ramesh)\nProfuse(tia)\nnot Plucky(martino)\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Nominal(x) and Pneumatic(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Raining(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and not Squiggly(x) -> not Raining(x))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Profuse(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and not Squiggly(x) -> Profuse(x))\nforall x (Profuse(x) and not Plucky(x) -> not Nominal(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) -> Nominal(x))\n\nnot Senecan(tia)\n\nProfuse(tia) and forall x (Profuse(x) -> Senecan(x)) -> therefore Senecan(tia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Felita is zestful. Shayla is shelvy. Joli is not carved. All shelvy things are cytotoxic. All slavonic, redeemed things are cytotoxic. If something is cytotoxic then it is futile. If something is carved and not zestful then it is not futile. If something is zestful then it is shelvy. If something is carved and not zestful then it is shelvy. If something is shelvy and not carved then it is not slavonic. If something is carved then it is slavonic. Shayla is futile.", "logic": "\nZestful(felita)\nShelvy(shayla)\nnot Carved(joli)\nforall x (Shelvy(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and Redeemed(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Futile(x))\nforall x (Carved(x) and not Zestful(x) -> not Futile(x))\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Carved(x) and not Zestful(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Shelvy(x) and not Carved(x) -> not Slavonic(x))\nforall x (Carved(x) -> Slavonic(x))\n\nFutile(shayla)\n\nShelvy(shayla) and forall x (Shelvy(x) -> Cytotoxic(x)) -> therefore Cytotoxic(shayla) Cytotoxic(shayla) and forall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Futile(x)) -> therefore Futile(shayla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Osbert is munificent. Syd is spinose. Jessalyn is not incorrect. All spinose things are tragicomic. All germane, pyrogenous things are tragicomic. If something is tragicomic then it is mammalian. If something is incorrect and not munificent then it is not mammalian. If something is munificent then it is spinose. If something is incorrect and not munificent then it is spinose. If something is spinose and not incorrect then it is not germane. If something is incorrect then it is germane. Osbert is not tragicomic.", "logic": "\nMunificent(osbert)\nSpinose(syd)\nnot Incorrect(jessalyn)\nforall x (Spinose(x) -> Tragicomic(x))\nforall x (Germane(x) and Pyrogenous(x) -> Tragicomic(x))\nforall x (Tragicomic(x) -> Mammalian(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and not Munificent(x) -> not Mammalian(x))\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Spinose(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and not Munificent(x) -> Spinose(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) and not Incorrect(x) -> not Germane(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) -> Germane(x))\n\nnot Tragicomic(osbert)\n\nMunificent(osbert) and forall x (Munificent(x) -> Spinose(x)) -> therefore Spinose(osbert) Spinose(osbert) and forall x (Spinose(x) -> Tragicomic(x)) -> therefore Tragicomic(osbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Quent is bounteous. Anthe is invalid. Dorette is not glamourous. All invalid things are millenary. All smashing, arthralgic things are millenary. If something is millenary then it is farsighted. If something is glamourous and not bounteous then it is not farsighted. If something is bounteous then it is invalid. If something is glamourous and not bounteous then it is invalid. If something is invalid and not glamourous then it is not smashing. If something is glamourous then it is smashing. Quent is farsighted.", "logic": "\nBounteous(quent)\nInvalid(anthe)\nnot Glamourous(dorette)\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Millenary(x))\nforall x (Smashing(x) and Arthralgic(x) -> Millenary(x))\nforall x (Millenary(x) -> Farsighted(x))\nforall x (Glamourous(x) and not Bounteous(x) -> not Farsighted(x))\nforall x (Bounteous(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Glamourous(x) and not Bounteous(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and not Glamourous(x) -> not Smashing(x))\nforall x (Glamourous(x) -> Smashing(x))\n\nFarsighted(quent)\n\nBounteous(quent) and forall x (Bounteous(x) -> Invalid(x)) -> therefore Invalid(quent) Invalid(quent) and forall x (Invalid(x) -> Millenary(x)) -> therefore Millenary(quent) Millenary(quent) and forall x (Millenary(x) -> Farsighted(x)) -> therefore Farsighted(quent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Shela is gentle. Michaela is unclear. Roselyn is not bridgeable. All unclear things are unsalable. All frilled, macho things are unsalable. If something is unsalable then it is mensal. If something is bridgeable and not gentle then it is not mensal. If something is gentle then it is unclear. If something is bridgeable and not gentle then it is unclear. If something is unclear and not bridgeable then it is not frilled. If something is bridgeable then it is frilled. Shela is not mensal.", "logic": "\nGentle(shela)\nUnclear(michaela)\nnot Bridgeable(roselyn)\nforall x (Unclear(x) -> Unsalable(x))\nforall x (Frilled(x) and Macho(x) -> Unsalable(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Mensal(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and not Gentle(x) -> not Mensal(x))\nforall x (Gentle(x) -> Unclear(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and not Gentle(x) -> Unclear(x))\nforall x (Unclear(x) and not Bridgeable(x) -> not Frilled(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> Frilled(x))\n\nnot Mensal(shela)\n\nGentle(shela) and forall x (Gentle(x) -> Unclear(x)) -> therefore Unclear(shela) Unclear(shela) and forall x (Unclear(x) -> Unsalable(x)) -> therefore Unsalable(shela) Unsalable(shela) and forall x (Unsalable(x) -> Mensal(x)) -> therefore Mensal(shela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Aubrey is andantino. Leonora is woollen. Ike is not muscular. All woollen things are nascent. All stagy, twinned things are nascent. If something is nascent then it is leavened. If something is muscular and not andantino then it is not leavened. If something is andantino then it is woollen. If something is muscular and not andantino then it is woollen. If something is woollen and not muscular then it is not stagy. If something is muscular then it is stagy. Ike is not stagy.", "logic": "\nAndantino(aubrey)\nWoollen(leonora)\nnot Muscular(ike)\nforall x (Woollen(x) -> Nascent(x))\nforall x (Stagy(x) and Twinned(x) -> Nascent(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> Leavened(x))\nforall x (Muscular(x) and not Andantino(x) -> not Leavened(x))\nforall x (Andantino(x) -> Woollen(x))\nforall x (Muscular(x) and not Andantino(x) -> Woollen(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) and not Muscular(x) -> not Stagy(x))\nforall x (Muscular(x) -> Stagy(x))\n\nnot Stagy(ike)\n\nforall x (Muscular(x) -> Stagy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Noah is favorable. Guinna is rising. Mitra is not chelated. All rising things are leaky. All scrubbed, exploitive things are leaky. If something is leaky then it is pillared. If something is chelated and not favorable then it is not pillared. If something is favorable then it is rising. If something is chelated and not favorable then it is rising. If something is rising and not chelated then it is not scrubbed. If something is chelated then it is scrubbed. Mitra is pillared.", "logic": "\nFavorable(noah)\nRising(guinna)\nnot Chelated(mitra)\nforall x (Rising(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) and Exploitive(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Leaky(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Chelated(x) and not Favorable(x) -> not Pillared(x))\nforall x (Favorable(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Chelated(x) and not Favorable(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Rising(x) and not Chelated(x) -> not Scrubbed(x))\nforall x (Chelated(x) -> Scrubbed(x))\n\nPillared(mitra)\n\nforall x (Leaky(x) -> Pillared(x)) <- forall x (Rising(x) -> Leaky(x)) <- forall x (Favorable(x) -> Rising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Inglebert is twoscore. Maisey is toroidal. Ronica is not ungodly. All toroidal things are tigerish. All amerindic, underwater things are tigerish. If something is tigerish then it is arcuate. If something is ungodly and not twoscore then it is not arcuate. If something is twoscore then it is toroidal. If something is ungodly and not twoscore then it is toroidal. If something is toroidal and not ungodly then it is not amerindic. If something is ungodly then it is amerindic. Maisey is not amerindic.", "logic": "\nTwoscore(inglebert)\nToroidal(maisey)\nnot Ungodly(ronica)\nforall x (Toroidal(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Amerindic(x) and Underwater(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Arcuate(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) and not Twoscore(x) -> not Arcuate(x))\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Toroidal(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) and not Twoscore(x) -> Toroidal(x))\nforall x (Toroidal(x) and not Ungodly(x) -> not Amerindic(x))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> Amerindic(x))\n\nnot Amerindic(maisey)\n\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> Amerindic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Drew is muddied. Abe is quilted. Gilligan is not summery. All quilted things are katharobic. All warlike, extirpable things are katharobic. If something is katharobic then it is catarrhal. If something is summery and not muddied then it is not catarrhal. If something is muddied then it is quilted. If something is summery and not muddied then it is quilted. If something is quilted and not summery then it is not warlike. If something is summery then it is warlike. Gilligan is quilted.", "logic": "\nMuddied(drew)\nQuilted(abe)\nnot Summery(gilligan)\nforall x (Quilted(x) -> Katharobic(x))\nforall x (Warlike(x) and Extirpable(x) -> Katharobic(x))\nforall x (Katharobic(x) -> Catarrhal(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) and not Muddied(x) -> not Catarrhal(x))\nforall x (Muddied(x) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) and not Muddied(x) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Quilted(x) and not Summery(x) -> not Warlike(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Warlike(x))\n\nQuilted(gilligan)\n\nforall x (Muddied(x) -> Quilted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Ameline is compressed. Odetta is apocrine. Annabela is not paradisal. All apocrine things are operculate. All grey, prejudiced things are operculate. If something is operculate then it is demoniac. If something is paradisal and not compressed then it is not demoniac. If something is compressed then it is apocrine. If something is paradisal and not compressed then it is apocrine. If something is apocrine and not paradisal then it is not grey. If something is paradisal then it is grey. Ameline is not prejudiced.", "logic": "\nCompressed(ameline)\nApocrine(odetta)\nnot Paradisal(annabela)\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> Operculate(x))\nforall x (Grey(x) and Prejudiced(x) -> Operculate(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) -> Demoniac(x))\nforall x (Paradisal(x) and not Compressed(x) -> not Demoniac(x))\nforall x (Compressed(x) -> Apocrine(x))\nforall x (Paradisal(x) and not Compressed(x) -> Apocrine(x))\nforall x (Apocrine(x) and not Paradisal(x) -> not Grey(x))\nforall x (Paradisal(x) -> Grey(x))\n\nnot Prejudiced(ameline)\n\nnot Prejudiced(ameline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Kory is atrophic. Astrid is metonymic. Mitch is not attacking. All metonymic things are ungallant. All vitrified, unrevealed things are ungallant. If something is ungallant then it is neandertal. If something is attacking and not atrophic then it is not neandertal. If something is atrophic then it is metonymic. If something is attacking and not atrophic then it is metonymic. If something is metonymic and not attacking then it is not vitrified. If something is attacking then it is vitrified. Mitch is atrophic.", "logic": "\nAtrophic(kory)\nMetonymic(astrid)\nnot Attacking(mitch)\nforall x (Metonymic(x) -> Ungallant(x))\nforall x (Vitrified(x) and Unrevealed(x) -> Ungallant(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) -> Neandertal(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) and not Atrophic(x) -> not Neandertal(x))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) -> Metonymic(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) and not Atrophic(x) -> Metonymic(x))\nforall x (Metonymic(x) and not Attacking(x) -> not Vitrified(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) -> Vitrified(x))\n\nAtrophic(mitch)\n\nAtrophic(mitch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Simon is hateful. Ellyn is wistful. Merrill is not offended. All wistful things are dissoluble. All manual, surmounted things are dissoluble. If something is dissoluble then it is empowered. If something is offended and not hateful then it is not empowered. If something is hateful then it is wistful. If something is offended and not hateful then it is wistful. If something is wistful and not offended then it is not manual. If something is offended then it is manual. Ellyn is not surmounted.", "logic": "\nHateful(simon)\nWistful(ellyn)\nnot Offended(merrill)\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) -> Empowered(x))\nforall x (Offended(x) and not Hateful(x) -> not Empowered(x))\nforall x (Hateful(x) -> Wistful(x))\nforall x (Offended(x) and not Hateful(x) -> Wistful(x))\nforall x (Wistful(x) and not Offended(x) -> not Manual(x))\nforall x (Offended(x) -> Manual(x))\n\nnot Surmounted(ellyn)\n\nnot Surmounted(ellyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Gerrit is visored. Robinia is forbidding. Ripley is not nerveless. All forbidding things are tensional. All lordly, plaintive things are tensional. If something is tensional then it is lone. If something is nerveless and not visored then it is not lone. If something is visored then it is forbidding. If something is nerveless and not visored then it is forbidding. If something is forbidding and not nerveless then it is not lordly. If something is nerveless then it is lordly. Ripley is plaintive.", "logic": "\nVisored(gerrit)\nForbidding(robinia)\nnot Nerveless(ripley)\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Tensional(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) and Plaintive(x) -> Tensional(x))\nforall x (Tensional(x) -> Lone(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and not Visored(x) -> not Lone(x))\nforall x (Visored(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and not Visored(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) and not Nerveless(x) -> not Lordly(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Lordly(x))\n\nPlaintive(ripley)\n\nPlaintive(ripley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Anallese is amative. Margi is vertebral. Tami is unsanitary. Big things are intuitive. Red things are active. Red, sombre things are active. Furry things are active. All intuitive, monthly things are amative. If something is vertebral then it is active. All monthly things are sombre. All vertebral things are monthly. Anallese is amative.", "logic": "\nAmative(anallese)\nVertebral(margi)\nUnsanitary(tami)\nforall x (Monthly(x) -> Intuitive(x))\nforall x (Amative(x) -> Active(x))\nforall x (Amative(x) and Sombre(x) -> Active(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Active(x))\nforall x (Intuitive(x) and Monthly(x) -> Amative(x))\nforall x (Vertebral(x) -> Active(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) -> Sombre(x))\nforall x (Vertebral(x) -> Monthly(x))\n\nAmative(anallese)\n\ntherefore Amative(anallese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Gregor is motivated. Tiebout is boney. Giralda is prisonlike. Big things are lucid. Red things are jocund. Red, offsides things are jocund. Furry things are jocund. All lucid, absorbed things are motivated. If something is boney then it is jocund. All absorbed things are offsides. All boney things are absorbed. Gregor is not motivated.", "logic": "\nMotivated(gregor)\nBoney(tiebout)\nPrisonlike(giralda)\nforall x (Absorbed(x) -> Lucid(x))\nforall x (Motivated(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Motivated(x) and Offsides(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) and Absorbed(x) -> Motivated(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Absorbed(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> Absorbed(x))\n\nnot Motivated(gregor)\n\ntherefore Motivated(gregor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Korry is spotty. Marillin is basidial. Jonah is nonprofit. Big things are mothproof. Red things are mirthful. Red, glaring things are mirthful. Furry things are mirthful. All mothproof, deniable things are spotty. If something is basidial then it is mirthful. All deniable things are glaring. All basidial things are deniable. Marillin is deniable.", "logic": "\nSpotty(korry)\nBasidial(marillin)\nNonprofit(jonah)\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Spotty(x) and Glaring(x) -> Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) -> Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Mothproof(x) and Deniable(x) -> Spotty(x))\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Deniable(x))\n\nDeniable(marillin)\n\nBasidial(marillin) and forall x (Basidial(x) -> Deniable(x)) -> therefore Deniable(marillin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Rudiger is conceptual. Renate is terrible. Lesley is palmlike. Big things are grateful. Red things are configured. Red, wanted things are configured. Furry things are configured. All grateful, supernal things are conceptual. If something is terrible then it is configured. All supernal things are wanted. All terrible things are supernal. Rudiger is not configured.", "logic": "\nConceptual(rudiger)\nTerrible(renate)\nPalmlike(lesley)\nforall x (Supernal(x) -> Grateful(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Wanted(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Grateful(x) and Supernal(x) -> Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Terrible(x) -> Configured(x))\nforall x (Supernal(x) -> Wanted(x))\nforall x (Terrible(x) -> Supernal(x))\n\nnot Configured(rudiger)\n\nConceptual(rudiger) and forall x (Conceptual(x) -> Configured(x)) -> therefore Configured(rudiger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Winne is haemolytic. Gusti is ludicrous. Skipper is aweigh. Big things are expired. Red things are nonextant. Red, fabulous things are nonextant. Furry things are nonextant. All expired, sapless things are haemolytic. If something is ludicrous then it is nonextant. All sapless things are fabulous. All ludicrous things are sapless. Gusti is fabulous.", "logic": "\nHaemolytic(winne)\nLudicrous(gusti)\nAweigh(skipper)\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Expired(x))\nforall x (Haemolytic(x) -> Nonextant(x))\nforall x (Haemolytic(x) and Fabulous(x) -> Nonextant(x))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Nonextant(x))\nforall x (Expired(x) and Sapless(x) -> Haemolytic(x))\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) -> Nonextant(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) -> Sapless(x))\n\nFabulous(gusti)\n\nLudicrous(gusti) and forall x (Ludicrous(x) -> Sapless(x)) -> therefore Sapless(gusti) Sapless(gusti) and forall x (Sapless(x) -> Fabulous(x)) -> therefore Fabulous(gusti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Maxfield is grapelike. Casper is unlittered. Gordon is improving. Big things are ungathered. Red things are untempered. Red, unbleached things are untempered. Furry things are untempered. All ungathered, sporty things are grapelike. If something is unlittered then it is untempered. All sporty things are unbleached. All unlittered things are sporty. Casper is not unbleached.", "logic": "\nGrapelike(maxfield)\nUnlittered(casper)\nImproving(gordon)\nforall x (Sporty(x) -> Ungathered(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) -> Untempered(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) and Unbleached(x) -> Untempered(x))\nforall x (Improving(x) -> Untempered(x))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) and Sporty(x) -> Grapelike(x))\nforall x (Unlittered(x) -> Untempered(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) -> Unbleached(x))\nforall x (Unlittered(x) -> Sporty(x))\n\nnot Unbleached(casper)\n\nUnlittered(casper) and forall x (Unlittered(x) -> Sporty(x)) -> therefore Sporty(casper) Sporty(casper) and forall x (Sporty(x) -> Unbleached(x)) -> therefore Unbleached(casper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Winna is cruddy. Mathew is roving. Mayor is basilary. Big things are crisp. Red things are panicky. Red, grumbling things are panicky. Furry things are panicky. All crisp, wordless things are cruddy. If something is roving then it is panicky. All wordless things are grumbling. All roving things are wordless. Mathew is cruddy.", "logic": "\nCruddy(winna)\nRoving(mathew)\nBasilary(mayor)\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Cruddy(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Cruddy(x) and Grumbling(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) and Wordless(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Roving(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Grumbling(x))\nforall x (Roving(x) -> Wordless(x))\n\nCruddy(mathew)\n\nRoving(mathew) and forall x (Roving(x) -> Wordless(x)) -> therefore Wordless(mathew) Wordless(mathew) and forall x (Wordless(x) -> Crisp(x)) -> therefore Crisp(mathew) Roving(mathew) and forall x (Roving(x) -> Wordless(x)) -> therefore Wordless(mathew) Crisp(mathew) and Wordless(mathew) and forall x (Crisp(x) and Wordless(x) -> Cruddy(x)) -> therefore Cruddy(mathew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Janaya is priapic. Arvin is cambial. Kaster is cuneal. Big things are roundabout. Red things are mesmeric. Red, tramontane things are mesmeric. Furry things are mesmeric. All roundabout, requisite things are priapic. If something is cambial then it is mesmeric. All requisite things are tramontane. All cambial things are requisite. Arvin is not priapic.", "logic": "\nPriapic(janaya)\nCambial(arvin)\nCuneal(kaster)\nforall x (Requisite(x) -> Roundabout(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) and Tramontane(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Roundabout(x) and Requisite(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) -> Requisite(x))\n\nnot Priapic(arvin)\n\nCambial(arvin) and forall x (Cambial(x) -> Requisite(x)) -> therefore Requisite(arvin) Requisite(arvin) and forall x (Requisite(x) -> Roundabout(x)) -> therefore Roundabout(arvin) Cambial(arvin) and forall x (Cambial(x) -> Requisite(x)) -> therefore Requisite(arvin) Roundabout(arvin) and Requisite(arvin) and forall x (Roundabout(x) and Requisite(x) -> Priapic(x)) -> therefore Priapic(arvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Thane is unsaid. Minetta is roofed. Wallie is joyful. Big things are phlegmy. Red things are emended. Red, entitled things are emended. Furry things are emended. All phlegmy, bedaubed things are unsaid. If something is roofed then it is emended. All bedaubed things are entitled. All roofed things are bedaubed. Wallie is not phlegmy.", "logic": "\nUnsaid(thane)\nRoofed(minetta)\nJoyful(wallie)\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) and Entitled(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Phlegmy(x) and Bedaubed(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Roofed(x) -> Emended(x))\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) -> Entitled(x))\nforall x (Roofed(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\n\nnot Phlegmy(wallie)\n\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) -> Phlegmy(x)) <- forall x (Roofed(x) -> Bedaubed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Agata is pokey. Lothar is cyclonal. Welbie is thirtieth. Big things are enchanting. Red things are revokable. Red, feminine things are revokable. Furry things are revokable. All enchanting, phreatic things are pokey. If something is cyclonal then it is revokable. All phreatic things are feminine. All cyclonal things are phreatic. Welbie is feminine.", "logic": "\nPokey(agata)\nCyclonal(lothar)\nThirtieth(welbie)\nforall x (Phreatic(x) -> Enchanting(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) and Feminine(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Enchanting(x) and Phreatic(x) -> Pokey(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Phreatic(x) -> Feminine(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) -> Phreatic(x))\n\nFeminine(welbie)\n\nforall x (Phreatic(x) -> Feminine(x)) <- forall x (Cyclonal(x) -> Phreatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Caron is unenrgetic. Tamas is canine. Ryann is petulant. Big things are choked. Red things are phagocytic. Red, equine things are phagocytic. Furry things are phagocytic. All choked, supervised things are unenrgetic. If something is canine then it is phagocytic. All supervised things are equine. All canine things are supervised. Caron is not supervised.", "logic": "\nUnenrgetic(caron)\nCanine(tamas)\nPetulant(ryann)\nforall x (Supervised(x) -> Choked(x))\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Unenrgetic(x) and Equine(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Choked(x) and Supervised(x) -> Unenrgetic(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Supervised(x) -> Equine(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Supervised(x))\n\nnot Supervised(caron)\n\nforall x (Canine(x) -> Supervised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Natala is resolved. Ronalda is rabbinical. Susanne is gracile. Big things are defensible. Red things are monotone. Red, courageous things are monotone. Furry things are monotone. All defensible, belted things are resolved. If something is rabbinical then it is monotone. All belted things are courageous. All rabbinical things are belted. Natala is defensible.", "logic": "\nResolved(natala)\nRabbinical(ronalda)\nGracile(susanne)\nforall x (Belted(x) -> Defensible(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) and Courageous(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Gracile(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Defensible(x) and Belted(x) -> Resolved(x))\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Belted(x) -> Courageous(x))\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Belted(x))\n\nDefensible(natala)\n\nforall x (Belted(x) -> Defensible(x)) <- forall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Belted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Sanderson is ritenuto. Dahlia is grapelike. Renard is jovian. Big things are unmolested. Red things are windy. Red, idealistic things are windy. Furry things are windy. All unmolested, simplified things are ritenuto. If something is grapelike then it is windy. All simplified things are idealistic. All grapelike things are simplified. Renard is not grapelike.", "logic": "\nRitenuto(sanderson)\nGrapelike(dahlia)\nJovian(renard)\nforall x (Simplified(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) and Idealistic(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Unmolested(x) and Simplified(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Simplified(x) -> Idealistic(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) -> Simplified(x))\n\nnot Grapelike(renard)\n\nnot Grapelike(renard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Charissa is untired. Tarrah is perceptual. Robbie is decollete. Big things are inshore. Red things are feathered. Red, volumetric things are feathered. Furry things are feathered. All inshore, watercress things are untired. If something is perceptual then it is feathered. All watercress things are volumetric. All perceptual things are watercress. Charissa is decollete.", "logic": "\nUntired(charissa)\nPerceptual(tarrah)\nDecollete(robbie)\nforall x (Watercress(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Untired(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Untired(x) and Volumetric(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Decollete(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Inshore(x) and Watercress(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) -> Feathered(x))\nforall x (Watercress(x) -> Volumetric(x))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) -> Watercress(x))\n\nDecollete(charissa)\n\nDecollete(charissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Hinda is hierarchal. Norry is embonpoint. Kameko is unavowed. Big things are tailless. Red things are spherical. Red, slavelike things are spherical. Furry things are spherical. All tailless, similar things are hierarchal. If something is embonpoint then it is spherical. All similar things are slavelike. All embonpoint things are similar. Hinda is not embonpoint.", "logic": "\nHierarchal(hinda)\nEmbonpoint(norry)\nUnavowed(kameko)\nforall x (Similar(x) -> Tailless(x))\nforall x (Hierarchal(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Hierarchal(x) and Slavelike(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Unavowed(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Tailless(x) and Similar(x) -> Hierarchal(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Similar(x) -> Slavelike(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Similar(x))\n\nnot Embonpoint(hinda)\n\nnot Embonpoint(hinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Lisandra is unfathomed. Garth is pregnant. Eliot is unremarked. Big things are unnamed. Red things are ascendible. Red, clubbish things are ascendible. Furry things are ascendible. All unnamed, belated things are unfathomed. If something is pregnant then it is ascendible. All belated things are clubbish. All pregnant things are belated. Garth is unremarked.", "logic": "\nUnfathomed(lisandra)\nPregnant(garth)\nUnremarked(eliot)\nforall x (Belated(x) -> Unnamed(x))\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Unnamed(x) and Belated(x) -> Unfathomed(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Belated(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Pregnant(x) -> Belated(x))\n\nUnremarked(garth)\n\nUnremarked(garth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Libbie is corded. Bren is not myelic. Dinah is ataxic. Vera is myelic. If someone is regulative then they are likely. If someone is corded then they are regulative. Rough, ataxic people are macedonian. If Bren is reformist and Bren is myelic then Bren is not ataxic. All likely people are myelic. If someone is reformist then they are myelic. If Vera is reformist then Vera is not myelic. If Vera is macedonian and Vera is not likely then Vera is reformist. Libbie is corded.", "logic": "\nCorded(libbie)\nnot Myelic(bren)\nAtaxic(dinah)\nMyelic(vera)\nforall x (Regulative(x) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) and Ataxic(x) -> Macedonian(x))\nReformist(bren) and Myelic(bren) -> not Ataxic(bren)\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Myelic(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) -> Myelic(x))\nReformist(vera) -> not Myelic(vera)\nMacedonian(vera) and not Likely(vera) -> Reformist(vera)\n\nCorded(libbie)\n\ntherefore Corded(libbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Chanda is pectinate. Giavani is not whippy. Marchall is sabahan. Sutton is whippy. If someone is ascosporic then they are semantic. If someone is pectinate then they are ascosporic. Rough, sabahan people are xlvi. If Giavani is holozoic and Giavani is whippy then Giavani is not sabahan. All semantic people are whippy. If someone is holozoic then they are whippy. If Sutton is holozoic then Sutton is not whippy. If Sutton is xlvi and Sutton is not semantic then Sutton is holozoic. Giavani is whippy.", "logic": "\nPectinate(chanda)\nnot Whippy(giavani)\nSabahan(marchall)\nWhippy(sutton)\nforall x (Ascosporic(x) -> Semantic(x))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) -> Ascosporic(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) and Sabahan(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nHolozoic(giavani) and Whippy(giavani) -> not Sabahan(giavani)\nforall x (Semantic(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Whippy(x))\nHolozoic(sutton) -> not Whippy(sutton)\nXlvi(sutton) and not Semantic(sutton) -> Holozoic(sutton)\n\nWhippy(giavani)\n\ntherefore not Whippy(giavani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Keeley is subsurface. Johan is not tapped. Harriet is cacogenic. Melosa is tapped. If someone is modernized then they are beatable. If someone is subsurface then they are modernized. Rough, cacogenic people are newsless. If Johan is chanted and Johan is tapped then Johan is not cacogenic. All beatable people are tapped. If someone is chanted then they are tapped. If Melosa is chanted then Melosa is not tapped. If Melosa is newsless and Melosa is not beatable then Melosa is chanted. Keeley is modernized.", "logic": "\nSubsurface(keeley)\nnot Tapped(johan)\nCacogenic(harriet)\nTapped(melosa)\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Beatable(x))\nforall x (Subsurface(x) -> Modernized(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) and Cacogenic(x) -> Newsless(x))\nChanted(johan) and Tapped(johan) -> not Cacogenic(johan)\nforall x (Beatable(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Tapped(x))\nChanted(melosa) -> not Tapped(melosa)\nNewsless(melosa) and not Beatable(melosa) -> Chanted(melosa)\n\nModernized(keeley)\n\nSubsurface(keeley) and forall x (Subsurface(x) -> Modernized(x)) -> therefore Modernized(keeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Una is menstrual. Grove is not isthmian. Jackelyn is corky. Eimile is isthmian. If someone is discalced then they are coronary. If someone is menstrual then they are discalced. Rough, corky people are persisting. If Grove is filial and Grove is isthmian then Grove is not corky. All coronary people are isthmian. If someone is filial then they are isthmian. If Eimile is filial then Eimile is not isthmian. If Eimile is persisting and Eimile is not coronary then Eimile is filial. Una is not discalced.", "logic": "\nMenstrual(una)\nnot Isthmian(grove)\nCorky(jackelyn)\nIsthmian(eimile)\nforall x (Discalced(x) -> Coronary(x))\nforall x (Menstrual(x) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Filial(x) and Corky(x) -> Persisting(x))\nFilial(grove) and Isthmian(grove) -> not Corky(grove)\nforall x (Coronary(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nforall x (Filial(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nFilial(eimile) -> not Isthmian(eimile)\nPersisting(eimile) and not Coronary(eimile) -> Filial(eimile)\n\nnot Discalced(una)\n\nMenstrual(una) and forall x (Menstrual(x) -> Discalced(x)) -> therefore Discalced(una)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Ingaborg is vicious. Toinette is not transonic. Pincas is inherent. Kaari is transonic. If someone is livable then they are surface. If someone is vicious then they are livable. Rough, inherent people are agonised. If Toinette is dismal and Toinette is transonic then Toinette is not inherent. All surface people are transonic. If someone is dismal then they are transonic. If Kaari is dismal then Kaari is not transonic. If Kaari is agonised and Kaari is not surface then Kaari is dismal. Ingaborg is surface.", "logic": "\nVicious(ingaborg)\nnot Transonic(toinette)\nInherent(pincas)\nTransonic(kaari)\nforall x (Livable(x) -> Surface(x))\nforall x (Vicious(x) -> Livable(x))\nforall x (Dismal(x) and Inherent(x) -> Agonised(x))\nDismal(toinette) and Transonic(toinette) -> not Inherent(toinette)\nforall x (Surface(x) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Dismal(x) -> Transonic(x))\nDismal(kaari) -> not Transonic(kaari)\nAgonised(kaari) and not Surface(kaari) -> Dismal(kaari)\n\nSurface(ingaborg)\n\nVicious(ingaborg) and forall x (Vicious(x) -> Livable(x)) -> therefore Livable(ingaborg) Livable(ingaborg) and forall x (Livable(x) -> Surface(x)) -> therefore Surface(ingaborg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Mollie is bewildered. Calvin is not southerly. Joice is wrapped. Joete is southerly. If someone is tributary then they are favourable. If someone is bewildered then they are tributary. Rough, wrapped people are conjoint. If Calvin is connubial and Calvin is southerly then Calvin is not wrapped. All favourable people are southerly. If someone is connubial then they are southerly. If Joete is connubial then Joete is not southerly. If Joete is conjoint and Joete is not favourable then Joete is connubial. Mollie is not favourable.", "logic": "\nBewildered(mollie)\nnot Southerly(calvin)\nWrapped(joice)\nSoutherly(joete)\nforall x (Tributary(x) -> Favourable(x))\nforall x (Bewildered(x) -> Tributary(x))\nforall x (Connubial(x) and Wrapped(x) -> Conjoint(x))\nConnubial(calvin) and Southerly(calvin) -> not Wrapped(calvin)\nforall x (Favourable(x) -> Southerly(x))\nforall x (Connubial(x) -> Southerly(x))\nConnubial(joete) -> not Southerly(joete)\nConjoint(joete) and not Favourable(joete) -> Connubial(joete)\n\nnot Favourable(mollie)\n\nBewildered(mollie) and forall x (Bewildered(x) -> Tributary(x)) -> therefore Tributary(mollie) Tributary(mollie) and forall x (Tributary(x) -> Favourable(x)) -> therefore Favourable(mollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Regen is labelled. Verene is not olympic. Letitia is poor. Rochell is olympic. If someone is glinting then they are cyprinoid. If someone is labelled then they are glinting. Rough, poor people are homegrown. If Verene is biomedical and Verene is olympic then Verene is not poor. All cyprinoid people are olympic. If someone is biomedical then they are olympic. If Rochell is biomedical then Rochell is not olympic. If Rochell is homegrown and Rochell is not cyprinoid then Rochell is biomedical. Regen is olympic.", "logic": "\nLabelled(regen)\nnot Olympic(verene)\nPoor(letitia)\nOlympic(rochell)\nforall x (Glinting(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Labelled(x) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Biomedical(x) and Poor(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nBiomedical(verene) and Olympic(verene) -> not Poor(verene)\nforall x (Cyprinoid(x) -> Olympic(x))\nforall x (Biomedical(x) -> Olympic(x))\nBiomedical(rochell) -> not Olympic(rochell)\nHomegrown(rochell) and not Cyprinoid(rochell) -> Biomedical(rochell)\n\nOlympic(regen)\n\nLabelled(regen) and forall x (Labelled(x) -> Glinting(x)) -> therefore Glinting(regen) Glinting(regen) and forall x (Glinting(x) -> Cyprinoid(x)) -> therefore Cyprinoid(regen) Cyprinoid(regen) and forall x (Cyprinoid(x) -> Olympic(x)) -> therefore Olympic(regen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Ashli is hangdog. Haskel is not tinny. Midge is appointive. Merilyn is tinny. If someone is uncordial then they are indicatory. If someone is hangdog then they are uncordial. Rough, appointive people are pleading. If Haskel is noncyclic and Haskel is tinny then Haskel is not appointive. All indicatory people are tinny. If someone is noncyclic then they are tinny. If Merilyn is noncyclic then Merilyn is not tinny. If Merilyn is pleading and Merilyn is not indicatory then Merilyn is noncyclic. Ashli is not tinny.", "logic": "\nHangdog(ashli)\nnot Tinny(haskel)\nAppointive(midge)\nTinny(merilyn)\nforall x (Uncordial(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) -> Uncordial(x))\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) and Appointive(x) -> Pleading(x))\nNoncyclic(haskel) and Tinny(haskel) -> not Appointive(haskel)\nforall x (Indicatory(x) -> Tinny(x))\nforall x (Noncyclic(x) -> Tinny(x))\nNoncyclic(merilyn) -> not Tinny(merilyn)\nPleading(merilyn) and not Indicatory(merilyn) -> Noncyclic(merilyn)\n\nnot Tinny(ashli)\n\nHangdog(ashli) and forall x (Hangdog(x) -> Uncordial(x)) -> therefore Uncordial(ashli) Uncordial(ashli) and forall x (Uncordial(x) -> Indicatory(x)) -> therefore Indicatory(ashli) Indicatory(ashli) and forall x (Indicatory(x) -> Tinny(x)) -> therefore Tinny(ashli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Marillin is immunized. Franz is not balsamy. Hayley is curious. Stig is balsamy. If someone is argentine then they are ready. If someone is immunized then they are argentine. Rough, curious people are improvised. If Franz is gnarled and Franz is balsamy then Franz is not curious. All ready people are balsamy. If someone is gnarled then they are balsamy. If Stig is gnarled then Stig is not balsamy. If Stig is improvised and Stig is not ready then Stig is gnarled. Hayley is not ready.", "logic": "\nImmunized(marillin)\nnot Balsamy(franz)\nCurious(hayley)\nBalsamy(stig)\nforall x (Argentine(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Immunized(x) -> Argentine(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) and Curious(x) -> Improvised(x))\nGnarled(franz) and Balsamy(franz) -> not Curious(franz)\nforall x (Ready(x) -> Balsamy(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) -> Balsamy(x))\nGnarled(stig) -> not Balsamy(stig)\nImprovised(stig) and not Ready(stig) -> Gnarled(stig)\n\nnot Ready(hayley)\n\nforall x (Argentine(x) -> Ready(x)) <- forall x (Immunized(x) -> Argentine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Vivyan is testaceous. Hellene is not separatist. Alonso is recumbent. Puff is separatist. If someone is candied then they are nonliving. If someone is testaceous then they are candied. Rough, recumbent people are inner. If Hellene is brutish and Hellene is separatist then Hellene is not recumbent. All nonliving people are separatist. If someone is brutish then they are separatist. If Puff is brutish then Puff is not separatist. If Puff is inner and Puff is not nonliving then Puff is brutish. Puff is inner.", "logic": "\nTestaceous(vivyan)\nnot Separatist(hellene)\nRecumbent(alonso)\nSeparatist(puff)\nforall x (Candied(x) -> Nonliving(x))\nforall x (Testaceous(x) -> Candied(x))\nforall x (Brutish(x) and Recumbent(x) -> Inner(x))\nBrutish(hellene) and Separatist(hellene) -> not Recumbent(hellene)\nforall x (Nonliving(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Brutish(x) -> Separatist(x))\nBrutish(puff) -> not Separatist(puff)\nInner(puff) and not Nonliving(puff) -> Brutish(puff)\n\nInner(puff)\n\nforall x (Brutish(x) and Recumbent(x) -> Inner(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Marcie is laic. Lloyd is not uproarious. Sophia is grungy. Ulrick is uproarious. If someone is jejune then they are bosky. If someone is laic then they are jejune. Rough, grungy people are heartsick. If Lloyd is cute and Lloyd is uproarious then Lloyd is not grungy. All bosky people are uproarious. If someone is cute then they are uproarious. If Ulrick is cute then Ulrick is not uproarious. If Ulrick is heartsick and Ulrick is not bosky then Ulrick is cute. Ulrick is not jejune.", "logic": "\nLaic(marcie)\nnot Uproarious(lloyd)\nGrungy(sophia)\nUproarious(ulrick)\nforall x (Jejune(x) -> Bosky(x))\nforall x (Laic(x) -> Jejune(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) and Grungy(x) -> Heartsick(x))\nCute(lloyd) and Uproarious(lloyd) -> not Grungy(lloyd)\nforall x (Bosky(x) -> Uproarious(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) -> Uproarious(x))\nCute(ulrick) -> not Uproarious(ulrick)\nHeartsick(ulrick) and not Bosky(ulrick) -> Cute(ulrick)\n\nnot Jejune(ulrick)\n\nforall x (Laic(x) -> Jejune(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Nahum is geometric. Milissent is not soggy. Hamlen is acinar. Flossy is soggy. If someone is monotonous then they are seeded. If someone is geometric then they are monotonous. Rough, acinar people are multiplied. If Milissent is gallant and Milissent is soggy then Milissent is not acinar. All seeded people are soggy. If someone is gallant then they are soggy. If Flossy is gallant then Flossy is not soggy. If Flossy is multiplied and Flossy is not seeded then Flossy is gallant. Hamlen is monotonous.", "logic": "\nGeometric(nahum)\nnot Soggy(milissent)\nAcinar(hamlen)\nSoggy(flossy)\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> Seeded(x))\nforall x (Geometric(x) -> Monotonous(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Acinar(x) -> Multiplied(x))\nGallant(milissent) and Soggy(milissent) -> not Acinar(milissent)\nforall x (Seeded(x) -> Soggy(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) -> Soggy(x))\nGallant(flossy) -> not Soggy(flossy)\nMultiplied(flossy) and not Seeded(flossy) -> Gallant(flossy)\n\nMonotonous(hamlen)\n\nforall x (Geometric(x) -> Monotonous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Quintana is loaded. Idell is not topnotch. Gunner is hebrew. Charmane is topnotch. If someone is striped then they are bathetic. If someone is loaded then they are striped. Rough, hebrew people are cutting. If Idell is inlaid and Idell is topnotch then Idell is not hebrew. All bathetic people are topnotch. If someone is inlaid then they are topnotch. If Charmane is inlaid then Charmane is not topnotch. If Charmane is cutting and Charmane is not bathetic then Charmane is inlaid. Charmane is not loaded.", "logic": "\nLoaded(quintana)\nnot Topnotch(idell)\nHebrew(gunner)\nTopnotch(charmane)\nforall x (Striped(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Loaded(x) -> Striped(x))\nforall x (Inlaid(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Cutting(x))\nInlaid(idell) and Topnotch(idell) -> not Hebrew(idell)\nforall x (Bathetic(x) -> Topnotch(x))\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Topnotch(x))\nInlaid(charmane) -> not Topnotch(charmane)\nCutting(charmane) and not Bathetic(charmane) -> Inlaid(charmane)\n\nnot Loaded(charmane)\n\nnot Loaded(charmane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Coreen is comforted. Calypso is not saltlike. Oneida is derisory. Laurance is saltlike. If someone is meltable then they are correlate. If someone is comforted then they are meltable. Rough, derisory people are eritrean. If Calypso is follicular and Calypso is saltlike then Calypso is not derisory. All correlate people are saltlike. If someone is follicular then they are saltlike. If Laurance is follicular then Laurance is not saltlike. If Laurance is eritrean and Laurance is not correlate then Laurance is follicular. Laurance is derisory.", "logic": "\nComforted(coreen)\nnot Saltlike(calypso)\nDerisory(oneida)\nSaltlike(laurance)\nforall x (Meltable(x) -> Correlate(x))\nforall x (Comforted(x) -> Meltable(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Derisory(x) -> Eritrean(x))\nFollicular(calypso) and Saltlike(calypso) -> not Derisory(calypso)\nforall x (Correlate(x) -> Saltlike(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) -> Saltlike(x))\nFollicular(laurance) -> not Saltlike(laurance)\nEritrean(laurance) and not Correlate(laurance) -> Follicular(laurance)\n\nDerisory(laurance)\n\nDerisory(laurance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Maribelle is unstinting. Prisca is not sweetheart. Cindra is hooved. Stormi is sweetheart. If someone is gauche then they are uncapped. If someone is unstinting then they are gauche. Rough, hooved people are palatine. If Prisca is follicular and Prisca is sweetheart then Prisca is not hooved. All uncapped people are sweetheart. If someone is follicular then they are sweetheart. If Stormi is follicular then Stormi is not sweetheart. If Stormi is palatine and Stormi is not uncapped then Stormi is follicular. Prisca is not hooved.", "logic": "\nUnstinting(maribelle)\nnot Sweetheart(prisca)\nHooved(cindra)\nSweetheart(stormi)\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Hooved(x) -> Palatine(x))\nFollicular(prisca) and Sweetheart(prisca) -> not Hooved(prisca)\nforall x (Uncapped(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nFollicular(stormi) -> not Sweetheart(stormi)\nPalatine(stormi) and not Uncapped(stormi) -> Follicular(stormi)\n\nnot Hooved(prisca)\n\nnot Hooved(prisca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Lynne is prepaid. Erma is not unstudious. Tammie is cloggy. Ilsa is unstudious. If someone is adust then they are reassuring. If someone is prepaid then they are adust. Rough, cloggy people are glaswegian. If Erma is loamy and Erma is unstudious then Erma is not cloggy. All reassuring people are unstudious. If someone is loamy then they are unstudious. If Ilsa is loamy then Ilsa is not unstudious. If Ilsa is glaswegian and Ilsa is not reassuring then Ilsa is loamy. Tammie is loamy.", "logic": "\nPrepaid(lynne)\nnot Unstudious(erma)\nCloggy(tammie)\nUnstudious(ilsa)\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Reassuring(x))\nforall x (Prepaid(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) and Cloggy(x) -> Glaswegian(x))\nLoamy(erma) and Unstudious(erma) -> not Cloggy(erma)\nforall x (Reassuring(x) -> Unstudious(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Unstudious(x))\nLoamy(ilsa) -> not Unstudious(ilsa)\nGlaswegian(ilsa) and not Reassuring(ilsa) -> Loamy(ilsa)\n\nLoamy(tammie)\n\nLoamy(tammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Teador is ghostly. Teador is ulcerous. Teador is amblyopic. Teador is nebular. Neddie is ghostly. Neddie is ulcerous. Neddie is amblyopic. Neddie is stupid. Neddie is diploid. Meier is eatable. Meier is ulcerous. Meier is nebular. Meier is stupid. Othelia is amblyopic. Othelia is nebular. Othelia is stupid. Nice, ulcerous things are nebular. Smart things are ghostly. If something is stupid and nebular then it is diploid. If Teador is stupid then Teador is amblyopic. If something is eatable and stupid then it is nebular. If Othelia is stupid and Othelia is ghostly then Othelia is ulcerous. Teador is ghostly.", "logic": "\nGhostly(teador)\nUlcerous(teador)\nAmblyopic(teador)\nNebular(teador)\nGhostly(neddie)\nUlcerous(neddie)\nAmblyopic(neddie)\nStupid(neddie)\nDiploid(neddie)\nEatable(meier)\nUlcerous(meier)\nNebular(meier)\nStupid(meier)\nAmblyopic(othelia)\nNebular(othelia)\nStupid(othelia)\nforall x (Amblyopic(x) and Ulcerous(x) -> Nebular(x))\nforall x (Diploid(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nforall x (Stupid(x) and Nebular(x) -> Diploid(x))\nStupid(teador) -> Amblyopic(teador)\nforall x (Eatable(x) and Stupid(x) -> Nebular(x))\nStupid(othelia) and Ghostly(othelia) -> Ulcerous(othelia)\n\nGhostly(teador)\n\ntherefore Ghostly(teador)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Johnna is scalable. Johnna is blended. Johnna is caprine. Johnna is behindhand. Honor is scalable. Honor is blended. Honor is caprine. Honor is beady. Honor is unthematic. Zebulon is anachronic. Zebulon is blended. Zebulon is behindhand. Zebulon is beady. Verney is caprine. Verney is behindhand. Verney is beady. Nice, blended things are behindhand. Smart things are scalable. If something is beady and behindhand then it is unthematic. If Johnna is beady then Johnna is caprine. If something is anachronic and beady then it is behindhand. If Verney is beady and Verney is scalable then Verney is blended. Johnna is not blended.", "logic": "\nScalable(johnna)\nBlended(johnna)\nCaprine(johnna)\nBehindhand(johnna)\nScalable(honor)\nBlended(honor)\nCaprine(honor)\nBeady(honor)\nUnthematic(honor)\nAnachronic(zebulon)\nBlended(zebulon)\nBehindhand(zebulon)\nBeady(zebulon)\nCaprine(verney)\nBehindhand(verney)\nBeady(verney)\nforall x (Caprine(x) and Blended(x) -> Behindhand(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Beady(x) and Behindhand(x) -> Unthematic(x))\nBeady(johnna) -> Caprine(johnna)\nforall x (Anachronic(x) and Beady(x) -> Behindhand(x))\nBeady(verney) and Scalable(verney) -> Blended(verney)\n\nnot Blended(johnna)\n\ntherefore Blended(johnna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Joel is retrousse. Joel is bicorn. Joel is cliched. Joel is unfirm. Maritsa is retrousse. Maritsa is bicorn. Maritsa is cliched. Maritsa is blaring. Maritsa is hungry. Kelila is wintery. Kelila is bicorn. Kelila is unfirm. Kelila is blaring. Aylmer is cliched. Aylmer is unfirm. Aylmer is blaring. Nice, bicorn things are unfirm. Smart things are retrousse. If something is blaring and unfirm then it is hungry. If Joel is blaring then Joel is cliched. If something is wintery and blaring then it is unfirm. If Aylmer is blaring and Aylmer is retrousse then Aylmer is bicorn. Kelila is hungry.", "logic": "\nRetrousse(joel)\nBicorn(joel)\nCliched(joel)\nUnfirm(joel)\nRetrousse(maritsa)\nBicorn(maritsa)\nCliched(maritsa)\nBlaring(maritsa)\nHungry(maritsa)\nWintery(kelila)\nBicorn(kelila)\nUnfirm(kelila)\nBlaring(kelila)\nCliched(aylmer)\nUnfirm(aylmer)\nBlaring(aylmer)\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Bicorn(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Hungry(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Blaring(x) and Unfirm(x) -> Hungry(x))\nBlaring(joel) -> Cliched(joel)\nforall x (Wintery(x) and Blaring(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nBlaring(aylmer) and Retrousse(aylmer) -> Bicorn(aylmer)\n\nHungry(kelila)\n\nBlaring(kelila) and Unfirm(kelila) and forall x (Blaring(x) and Unfirm(x) -> Hungry(x)) -> therefore Hungry(kelila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Lula is julian. Lula is jejune. Lula is murky. Lula is concurring. Clarke is julian. Clarke is jejune. Clarke is murky. Clarke is unburied. Clarke is bivariate. Dalila is donatist. Dalila is jejune. Dalila is concurring. Dalila is unburied. Valeda is murky. Valeda is concurring. Valeda is unburied. Nice, jejune things are concurring. Smart things are julian. If something is unburied and concurring then it is bivariate. If Lula is unburied then Lula is murky. If something is donatist and unburied then it is concurring. If Valeda is unburied and Valeda is julian then Valeda is jejune. Valeda is not bivariate.", "logic": "\nJulian(lula)\nJejune(lula)\nMurky(lula)\nConcurring(lula)\nJulian(clarke)\nJejune(clarke)\nMurky(clarke)\nUnburied(clarke)\nBivariate(clarke)\nDonatist(dalila)\nJejune(dalila)\nConcurring(dalila)\nUnburied(dalila)\nMurky(valeda)\nConcurring(valeda)\nUnburied(valeda)\nforall x (Murky(x) and Jejune(x) -> Concurring(x))\nforall x (Bivariate(x) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Unburied(x) and Concurring(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nUnburied(lula) -> Murky(lula)\nforall x (Donatist(x) and Unburied(x) -> Concurring(x))\nUnburied(valeda) and Julian(valeda) -> Jejune(valeda)\n\nnot Bivariate(valeda)\n\nUnburied(valeda) and Concurring(valeda) and forall x (Unburied(x) and Concurring(x) -> Bivariate(x)) -> therefore Bivariate(valeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Jeth is glabellar. Jeth is damaged. Jeth is hooklike. Jeth is bracteal. Gera is glabellar. Gera is damaged. Gera is hooklike. Gera is intestinal. Gera is punitive. Angelique is moslem. Angelique is damaged. Angelique is bracteal. Angelique is intestinal. Ric is hooklike. Ric is bracteal. Ric is intestinal. Nice, damaged things are bracteal. Smart things are glabellar. If something is intestinal and bracteal then it is punitive. If Jeth is intestinal then Jeth is hooklike. If something is moslem and intestinal then it is bracteal. If Ric is intestinal and Ric is glabellar then Ric is damaged. Ric is glabellar.", "logic": "\nGlabellar(jeth)\nDamaged(jeth)\nHooklike(jeth)\nBracteal(jeth)\nGlabellar(gera)\nDamaged(gera)\nHooklike(gera)\nIntestinal(gera)\nPunitive(gera)\nMoslem(angelique)\nDamaged(angelique)\nBracteal(angelique)\nIntestinal(angelique)\nHooklike(ric)\nBracteal(ric)\nIntestinal(ric)\nforall x (Hooklike(x) and Damaged(x) -> Bracteal(x))\nforall x (Punitive(x) -> Glabellar(x))\nforall x (Intestinal(x) and Bracteal(x) -> Punitive(x))\nIntestinal(jeth) -> Hooklike(jeth)\nforall x (Moslem(x) and Intestinal(x) -> Bracteal(x))\nIntestinal(ric) and Glabellar(ric) -> Damaged(ric)\n\nGlabellar(ric)\n\nIntestinal(ric) and Bracteal(ric) and forall x (Intestinal(x) and Bracteal(x) -> Punitive(x)) -> therefore Punitive(ric) Punitive(ric) and forall x (Punitive(x) -> Glabellar(x)) -> therefore Glabellar(ric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Pansie is prideful. Pansie is favorite. Pansie is synoptic. Pansie is weblike. Sharra is prideful. Sharra is favorite. Sharra is synoptic. Sharra is hunched. Sharra is unconsumed. Giralda is obliging. Giralda is favorite. Giralda is weblike. Giralda is hunched. Ezechiel is synoptic. Ezechiel is weblike. Ezechiel is hunched. Nice, favorite things are weblike. Smart things are prideful. If something is hunched and weblike then it is unconsumed. If Pansie is hunched then Pansie is synoptic. If something is obliging and hunched then it is weblike. If Ezechiel is hunched and Ezechiel is prideful then Ezechiel is favorite. Ezechiel is not prideful.", "logic": "\nPrideful(pansie)\nFavorite(pansie)\nSynoptic(pansie)\nWeblike(pansie)\nPrideful(sharra)\nFavorite(sharra)\nSynoptic(sharra)\nHunched(sharra)\nUnconsumed(sharra)\nObliging(giralda)\nFavorite(giralda)\nWeblike(giralda)\nHunched(giralda)\nSynoptic(ezechiel)\nWeblike(ezechiel)\nHunched(ezechiel)\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and Favorite(x) -> Weblike(x))\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) -> Prideful(x))\nforall x (Hunched(x) and Weblike(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nHunched(pansie) -> Synoptic(pansie)\nforall x (Obliging(x) and Hunched(x) -> Weblike(x))\nHunched(ezechiel) and Prideful(ezechiel) -> Favorite(ezechiel)\n\nnot Prideful(ezechiel)\n\nHunched(ezechiel) and Weblike(ezechiel) and forall x (Hunched(x) and Weblike(x) -> Unconsumed(x)) -> therefore Unconsumed(ezechiel) Unconsumed(ezechiel) and forall x (Unconsumed(x) -> Prideful(x)) -> therefore Prideful(ezechiel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Hayden is nonunion. Hayden is remote. Hayden is curst. Hayden is pediatric. Darya is nonunion. Darya is remote. Darya is curst. Darya is graduate. Darya is democratic. Terrie is putrescent. Terrie is remote. Terrie is pediatric. Terrie is graduate. Raychel is curst. Raychel is pediatric. Raychel is graduate. Nice, remote things are pediatric. Smart things are nonunion. If something is graduate and pediatric then it is democratic. If Hayden is graduate then Hayden is curst. If something is putrescent and graduate then it is pediatric. If Raychel is graduate and Raychel is nonunion then Raychel is remote. Raychel is remote.", "logic": "\nNonunion(hayden)\nRemote(hayden)\nCurst(hayden)\nPediatric(hayden)\nNonunion(darya)\nRemote(darya)\nCurst(darya)\nGraduate(darya)\nDemocratic(darya)\nPutrescent(terrie)\nRemote(terrie)\nPediatric(terrie)\nGraduate(terrie)\nCurst(raychel)\nPediatric(raychel)\nGraduate(raychel)\nforall x (Curst(x) and Remote(x) -> Pediatric(x))\nforall x (Democratic(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nforall x (Graduate(x) and Pediatric(x) -> Democratic(x))\nGraduate(hayden) -> Curst(hayden)\nforall x (Putrescent(x) and Graduate(x) -> Pediatric(x))\nGraduate(raychel) and Nonunion(raychel) -> Remote(raychel)\n\nRemote(raychel)\n\nGraduate(raychel) and Pediatric(raychel) and forall x (Graduate(x) and Pediatric(x) -> Democratic(x)) -> therefore Democratic(raychel) Democratic(raychel) and forall x (Democratic(x) -> Nonunion(x)) -> therefore Nonunion(raychel) Graduate(raychel) and Nonunion(raychel) and Graduate(raychel) and Nonunion(raychel) -> Remote(raychel) -> therefore Remote(raychel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Jaine is suppliant. Jaine is bright. Jaine is organismic. Jaine is amalgamate. Stephen is suppliant. Stephen is bright. Stephen is organismic. Stephen is unimpeded. Stephen is perfidious. Steward is outraged. Steward is bright. Steward is amalgamate. Steward is unimpeded. Hollis is organismic. Hollis is amalgamate. Hollis is unimpeded. Nice, bright things are amalgamate. Smart things are suppliant. If something is unimpeded and amalgamate then it is perfidious. If Jaine is unimpeded then Jaine is organismic. If something is outraged and unimpeded then it is amalgamate. If Hollis is unimpeded and Hollis is suppliant then Hollis is bright. Hollis is not bright.", "logic": "\nSuppliant(jaine)\nBright(jaine)\nOrganismic(jaine)\nAmalgamate(jaine)\nSuppliant(stephen)\nBright(stephen)\nOrganismic(stephen)\nUnimpeded(stephen)\nPerfidious(stephen)\nOutraged(steward)\nBright(steward)\nAmalgamate(steward)\nUnimpeded(steward)\nOrganismic(hollis)\nAmalgamate(hollis)\nUnimpeded(hollis)\nforall x (Organismic(x) and Bright(x) -> Amalgamate(x))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) -> Suppliant(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) and Amalgamate(x) -> Perfidious(x))\nUnimpeded(jaine) -> Organismic(jaine)\nforall x (Outraged(x) and Unimpeded(x) -> Amalgamate(x))\nUnimpeded(hollis) and Suppliant(hollis) -> Bright(hollis)\n\nnot Bright(hollis)\n\nUnimpeded(hollis) and Amalgamate(hollis) and forall x (Unimpeded(x) and Amalgamate(x) -> Perfidious(x)) -> therefore Perfidious(hollis) Perfidious(hollis) and forall x (Perfidious(x) -> Suppliant(x)) -> therefore Suppliant(hollis) Unimpeded(hollis) and Suppliant(hollis) and Unimpeded(hollis) and Suppliant(hollis) -> Bright(hollis) -> therefore Bright(hollis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Angelo is tasty. Angelo is silver. Angelo is anamnestic. Angelo is illicit. Kesley is tasty. Kesley is silver. Kesley is anamnestic. Kesley is brute. Kesley is unwed. Sydney is continuing. Sydney is silver. Sydney is illicit. Sydney is brute. Bartlett is anamnestic. Bartlett is illicit. Bartlett is brute. Nice, silver things are illicit. Smart things are tasty. If something is brute and illicit then it is unwed. If Angelo is brute then Angelo is anamnestic. If something is continuing and brute then it is illicit. If Bartlett is brute and Bartlett is tasty then Bartlett is silver. Angelo is not unwed.", "logic": "\nTasty(angelo)\nSilver(angelo)\nAnamnestic(angelo)\nIllicit(angelo)\nTasty(kesley)\nSilver(kesley)\nAnamnestic(kesley)\nBrute(kesley)\nUnwed(kesley)\nContinuing(sydney)\nSilver(sydney)\nIllicit(sydney)\nBrute(sydney)\nAnamnestic(bartlett)\nIllicit(bartlett)\nBrute(bartlett)\nforall x (Anamnestic(x) and Silver(x) -> Illicit(x))\nforall x (Unwed(x) -> Tasty(x))\nforall x (Brute(x) and Illicit(x) -> Unwed(x))\nBrute(angelo) -> Anamnestic(angelo)\nforall x (Continuing(x) and Brute(x) -> Illicit(x))\nBrute(bartlett) and Tasty(bartlett) -> Silver(bartlett)\n\nnot Unwed(angelo)\n\nforall x (Brute(x) and Illicit(x) -> Unwed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Alexander is gallant. Alexander is teen. Alexander is opportune. Alexander is unlatched. Midge is gallant. Midge is teen. Midge is opportune. Midge is trilobated. Midge is resinlike. Leon is developed. Leon is teen. Leon is unlatched. Leon is trilobated. Quintilla is opportune. Quintilla is unlatched. Quintilla is trilobated. Nice, teen things are unlatched. Smart things are gallant. If something is trilobated and unlatched then it is resinlike. If Alexander is trilobated then Alexander is opportune. If something is developed and trilobated then it is unlatched. If Quintilla is trilobated and Quintilla is gallant then Quintilla is teen. Alexander is developed.", "logic": "\nGallant(alexander)\nTeen(alexander)\nOpportune(alexander)\nUnlatched(alexander)\nGallant(midge)\nTeen(midge)\nOpportune(midge)\nTrilobated(midge)\nResinlike(midge)\nDeveloped(leon)\nTeen(leon)\nUnlatched(leon)\nTrilobated(leon)\nOpportune(quintilla)\nUnlatched(quintilla)\nTrilobated(quintilla)\nforall x (Opportune(x) and Teen(x) -> Unlatched(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Trilobated(x) and Unlatched(x) -> Resinlike(x))\nTrilobated(alexander) -> Opportune(alexander)\nforall x (Developed(x) and Trilobated(x) -> Unlatched(x))\nTrilobated(quintilla) and Gallant(quintilla) -> Teen(quintilla)\n\nDeveloped(alexander)\n\nDeveloped(alexander) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Belinda is canted. Belinda is incoming. Belinda is sigmoidal. Belinda is vengeful. Munroe is canted. Munroe is incoming. Munroe is sigmoidal. Munroe is unforceful. Munroe is unavowed. Dan is comforted. Dan is incoming. Dan is vengeful. Dan is unforceful. Roze is sigmoidal. Roze is vengeful. Roze is unforceful. Nice, incoming things are vengeful. Smart things are canted. If something is unforceful and vengeful then it is unavowed. If Belinda is unforceful then Belinda is sigmoidal. If something is comforted and unforceful then it is vengeful. If Roze is unforceful and Roze is canted then Roze is incoming. Munroe is not comforted.", "logic": "\nCanted(belinda)\nIncoming(belinda)\nSigmoidal(belinda)\nVengeful(belinda)\nCanted(munroe)\nIncoming(munroe)\nSigmoidal(munroe)\nUnforceful(munroe)\nUnavowed(munroe)\nComforted(dan)\nIncoming(dan)\nVengeful(dan)\nUnforceful(dan)\nSigmoidal(roze)\nVengeful(roze)\nUnforceful(roze)\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) and Incoming(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Unavowed(x) -> Canted(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) and Vengeful(x) -> Unavowed(x))\nUnforceful(belinda) -> Sigmoidal(belinda)\nforall x (Comforted(x) and Unforceful(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nUnforceful(roze) and Canted(roze) -> Incoming(roze)\n\nnot Comforted(munroe)\n\nnot Comforted(munroe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Illa is undesirous. Illa is balding. Illa is avocado. Illa is unbarreled. Derek is undesirous. Derek is balding. Derek is avocado. Derek is persuasive. Derek is tasmanian. Bud is basidial. Bud is balding. Bud is unbarreled. Bud is persuasive. Rabbi is avocado. Rabbi is unbarreled. Rabbi is persuasive. Nice, balding things are unbarreled. Smart things are undesirous. If something is persuasive and unbarreled then it is tasmanian. If Illa is persuasive then Illa is avocado. If something is basidial and persuasive then it is unbarreled. If Rabbi is persuasive and Rabbi is undesirous then Rabbi is balding. Rabbi is basidial.", "logic": "\nUndesirous(illa)\nBalding(illa)\nAvocado(illa)\nUnbarreled(illa)\nUndesirous(derek)\nBalding(derek)\nAvocado(derek)\nPersuasive(derek)\nTasmanian(derek)\nBasidial(bud)\nBalding(bud)\nUnbarreled(bud)\nPersuasive(bud)\nAvocado(rabbi)\nUnbarreled(rabbi)\nPersuasive(rabbi)\nforall x (Avocado(x) and Balding(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\nforall x (Tasmanian(x) -> Undesirous(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) and Unbarreled(x) -> Tasmanian(x))\nPersuasive(illa) -> Avocado(illa)\nforall x (Basidial(x) and Persuasive(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\nPersuasive(rabbi) and Undesirous(rabbi) -> Balding(rabbi)\n\nBasidial(rabbi)\n\nBasidial(rabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Neile is optative. Neile is whorled. Neile is anoxemic. Neile is luscious. Bianca is optative. Bianca is whorled. Bianca is anoxemic. Bianca is exogenic. Bianca is dendroidal. Vikky is wordy. Vikky is whorled. Vikky is luscious. Vikky is exogenic. Husain is anoxemic. Husain is luscious. Husain is exogenic. Nice, whorled things are luscious. Smart things are optative. If something is exogenic and luscious then it is dendroidal. If Neile is exogenic then Neile is anoxemic. If something is wordy and exogenic then it is luscious. If Husain is exogenic and Husain is optative then Husain is whorled. Neile is not exogenic.", "logic": "\nOptative(neile)\nWhorled(neile)\nAnoxemic(neile)\nLuscious(neile)\nOptative(bianca)\nWhorled(bianca)\nAnoxemic(bianca)\nExogenic(bianca)\nDendroidal(bianca)\nWordy(vikky)\nWhorled(vikky)\nLuscious(vikky)\nExogenic(vikky)\nAnoxemic(husain)\nLuscious(husain)\nExogenic(husain)\nforall x (Anoxemic(x) and Whorled(x) -> Luscious(x))\nforall x (Dendroidal(x) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Luscious(x) -> Dendroidal(x))\nExogenic(neile) -> Anoxemic(neile)\nforall x (Wordy(x) and Exogenic(x) -> Luscious(x))\nExogenic(husain) and Optative(husain) -> Whorled(husain)\n\nnot Exogenic(neile)\n\nnot Exogenic(neile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Anabella is sagacious. Anabella is hueless. Anabella is delphic. Anabella is cramped. Alethea is sagacious. Alethea is hueless. Alethea is delphic. Alethea is offish. Alethea is fledgeling. Lauree is inanimate. Lauree is hueless. Lauree is cramped. Lauree is offish. Aile is delphic. Aile is cramped. Aile is offish. Nice, hueless things are cramped. Smart things are sagacious. If something is offish and cramped then it is fledgeling. If Anabella is offish then Anabella is delphic. If something is inanimate and offish then it is cramped. If Aile is offish and Aile is sagacious then Aile is hueless. Lauree is delphic.", "logic": "\nSagacious(anabella)\nHueless(anabella)\nDelphic(anabella)\nCramped(anabella)\nSagacious(alethea)\nHueless(alethea)\nDelphic(alethea)\nOffish(alethea)\nFledgeling(alethea)\nInanimate(lauree)\nHueless(lauree)\nCramped(lauree)\nOffish(lauree)\nDelphic(aile)\nCramped(aile)\nOffish(aile)\nforall x (Delphic(x) and Hueless(x) -> Cramped(x))\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nforall x (Offish(x) and Cramped(x) -> Fledgeling(x))\nOffish(anabella) -> Delphic(anabella)\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Offish(x) -> Cramped(x))\nOffish(aile) and Sagacious(aile) -> Hueless(aile)\n\nDelphic(lauree)\n\nDelphic(lauree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Cobbie is postmodern. Cobbie is bavarian. Cobbie is equipped. Cobbie is caller. Artie is piggy. Artie is caller. Yolanthe is lepidote. Yolanthe is bashful. Yolanthe is postmodern. Yolanthe is piggy. Yolanthe is bavarian. Yolanthe is caller. Nice, postmodern things are bashful. If Artie is caller and Artie is lepidote then Artie is equipped. Rough, piggy things are postmodern. All caller things are bavarian. Young things are lepidote. If something is lepidote and bavarian then it is bashful. Artie is piggy.", "logic": "\nPostmodern(cobbie)\nBavarian(cobbie)\nEquipped(cobbie)\nCaller(cobbie)\nPiggy(artie)\nCaller(artie)\nLepidote(yolanthe)\nBashful(yolanthe)\nPostmodern(yolanthe)\nPiggy(yolanthe)\nBavarian(yolanthe)\nCaller(yolanthe)\nforall x (Piggy(x) and Postmodern(x) -> Bashful(x))\nCaller(artie) and Lepidote(artie) -> Equipped(artie)\nforall x (Equipped(x) and Piggy(x) -> Postmodern(x))\nforall x (Caller(x) -> Bavarian(x))\nforall x (Caller(x) -> Lepidote(x))\nforall x (Lepidote(x) and Bavarian(x) -> Bashful(x))\n\nPiggy(artie)\n\ntherefore Piggy(artie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Barbara is timeworn. Barbara is residual. Barbara is peninsular. Barbara is chafflike. Carolin is polar. Carolin is chafflike. Corabella is sceptred. Corabella is darkish. Corabella is timeworn. Corabella is polar. Corabella is residual. Corabella is chafflike. Nice, timeworn things are darkish. If Carolin is chafflike and Carolin is sceptred then Carolin is peninsular. Rough, polar things are timeworn. All chafflike things are residual. Young things are sceptred. If something is sceptred and residual then it is darkish. Carolin is not polar.", "logic": "\nTimeworn(barbara)\nResidual(barbara)\nPeninsular(barbara)\nChafflike(barbara)\nPolar(carolin)\nChafflike(carolin)\nSceptred(corabella)\nDarkish(corabella)\nTimeworn(corabella)\nPolar(corabella)\nResidual(corabella)\nChafflike(corabella)\nforall x (Polar(x) and Timeworn(x) -> Darkish(x))\nChafflike(carolin) and Sceptred(carolin) -> Peninsular(carolin)\nforall x (Peninsular(x) and Polar(x) -> Timeworn(x))\nforall x (Chafflike(x) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Chafflike(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Sceptred(x) and Residual(x) -> Darkish(x))\n\nnot Polar(carolin)\n\ntherefore Polar(carolin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Tucky is cataclinal. Tucky is rococo. Tucky is testate. Tucky is ergotropic. Estel is hiemal. Estel is ergotropic. Willmott is wriggly. Willmott is obtainable. Willmott is cataclinal. Willmott is hiemal. Willmott is rococo. Willmott is ergotropic. Nice, cataclinal things are obtainable. If Estel is ergotropic and Estel is wriggly then Estel is testate. Rough, hiemal things are cataclinal. All ergotropic things are rococo. Young things are wriggly. If something is wriggly and rococo then it is obtainable. Tucky is wriggly.", "logic": "\nCataclinal(tucky)\nRococo(tucky)\nTestate(tucky)\nErgotropic(tucky)\nHiemal(estel)\nErgotropic(estel)\nWriggly(willmott)\nObtainable(willmott)\nCataclinal(willmott)\nHiemal(willmott)\nRococo(willmott)\nErgotropic(willmott)\nforall x (Hiemal(x) and Cataclinal(x) -> Obtainable(x))\nErgotropic(estel) and Wriggly(estel) -> Testate(estel)\nforall x (Testate(x) and Hiemal(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) -> Rococo(x))\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Wriggly(x) and Rococo(x) -> Obtainable(x))\n\nWriggly(tucky)\n\nErgotropic(tucky) and forall x (Ergotropic(x) -> Wriggly(x)) -> therefore Wriggly(tucky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Walden is antiviral. Walden is verifying. Walden is maintained. Walden is perverse. Murdoch is wonderful. Murdoch is perverse. Alis is cenozoic. Alis is shielded. Alis is antiviral. Alis is wonderful. Alis is verifying. Alis is perverse. Nice, antiviral things are shielded. If Murdoch is perverse and Murdoch is cenozoic then Murdoch is maintained. Rough, wonderful things are antiviral. All perverse things are verifying. Young things are cenozoic. If something is cenozoic and verifying then it is shielded. Murdoch is not cenozoic.", "logic": "\nAntiviral(walden)\nVerifying(walden)\nMaintained(walden)\nPerverse(walden)\nWonderful(murdoch)\nPerverse(murdoch)\nCenozoic(alis)\nShielded(alis)\nAntiviral(alis)\nWonderful(alis)\nVerifying(alis)\nPerverse(alis)\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and Antiviral(x) -> Shielded(x))\nPerverse(murdoch) and Cenozoic(murdoch) -> Maintained(murdoch)\nforall x (Maintained(x) and Wonderful(x) -> Antiviral(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Verifying(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Cenozoic(x))\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) and Verifying(x) -> Shielded(x))\n\nnot Cenozoic(murdoch)\n\nPerverse(murdoch) and forall x (Perverse(x) -> Cenozoic(x)) -> therefore Cenozoic(murdoch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Chan is grating. Chan is frenetic. Chan is forensic. Chan is gluteal. Shanta is crenulate. Shanta is gluteal. Ethelind is azygos. Ethelind is fibreoptic. Ethelind is grating. Ethelind is crenulate. Ethelind is frenetic. Ethelind is gluteal. Nice, grating things are fibreoptic. If Shanta is gluteal and Shanta is azygos then Shanta is forensic. Rough, crenulate things are grating. All gluteal things are frenetic. Young things are azygos. If something is azygos and frenetic then it is fibreoptic. Chan is fibreoptic.", "logic": "\nGrating(chan)\nFrenetic(chan)\nForensic(chan)\nGluteal(chan)\nCrenulate(shanta)\nGluteal(shanta)\nAzygos(ethelind)\nFibreoptic(ethelind)\nGrating(ethelind)\nCrenulate(ethelind)\nFrenetic(ethelind)\nGluteal(ethelind)\nforall x (Crenulate(x) and Grating(x) -> Fibreoptic(x))\nGluteal(shanta) and Azygos(shanta) -> Forensic(shanta)\nforall x (Forensic(x) and Crenulate(x) -> Grating(x))\nforall x (Gluteal(x) -> Frenetic(x))\nforall x (Gluteal(x) -> Azygos(x))\nforall x (Azygos(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Fibreoptic(x))\n\nFibreoptic(chan)\n\nGluteal(chan) and forall x (Gluteal(x) -> Azygos(x)) -> therefore Azygos(chan) Azygos(chan) and Frenetic(chan) and forall x (Azygos(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Fibreoptic(x)) -> therefore Fibreoptic(chan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Benton is pavlovian. Benton is besotted. Benton is disgusting. Benton is struggling. Petunia is terrible. Petunia is struggling. Poppy is regnant. Poppy is nonfissile. Poppy is pavlovian. Poppy is terrible. Poppy is besotted. Poppy is struggling. Nice, pavlovian things are nonfissile. If Petunia is struggling and Petunia is regnant then Petunia is disgusting. Rough, terrible things are pavlovian. All struggling things are besotted. Young things are regnant. If something is regnant and besotted then it is nonfissile. Benton is not nonfissile.", "logic": "\nPavlovian(benton)\nBesotted(benton)\nDisgusting(benton)\nStruggling(benton)\nTerrible(petunia)\nStruggling(petunia)\nRegnant(poppy)\nNonfissile(poppy)\nPavlovian(poppy)\nTerrible(poppy)\nBesotted(poppy)\nStruggling(poppy)\nforall x (Terrible(x) and Pavlovian(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nStruggling(petunia) and Regnant(petunia) -> Disgusting(petunia)\nforall x (Disgusting(x) and Terrible(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Besotted(x))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Regnant(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Besotted(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\n\nnot Nonfissile(benton)\n\nStruggling(benton) and forall x (Struggling(x) -> Regnant(x)) -> therefore Regnant(benton) Regnant(benton) and Besotted(benton) and forall x (Regnant(x) and Besotted(x) -> Nonfissile(x)) -> therefore Nonfissile(benton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Alphonse is crustose. Alphonse is unbalanced. Alphonse is outrigged. Alphonse is immoderate. Laure is seriocomic. Laure is immoderate. Kory is sedgy. Kory is sarawakian. Kory is crustose. Kory is seriocomic. Kory is unbalanced. Kory is immoderate. Nice, crustose things are sarawakian. If Laure is immoderate and Laure is sedgy then Laure is outrigged. Rough, seriocomic things are crustose. All immoderate things are unbalanced. Young things are sedgy. If something is sedgy and unbalanced then it is sarawakian. Laure is crustose.", "logic": "\nCrustose(alphonse)\nUnbalanced(alphonse)\nOutrigged(alphonse)\nImmoderate(alphonse)\nSeriocomic(laure)\nImmoderate(laure)\nSedgy(kory)\nSarawakian(kory)\nCrustose(kory)\nSeriocomic(kory)\nUnbalanced(kory)\nImmoderate(kory)\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) and Crustose(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nImmoderate(laure) and Sedgy(laure) -> Outrigged(laure)\nforall x (Outrigged(x) and Seriocomic(x) -> Crustose(x))\nforall x (Immoderate(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Immoderate(x) -> Sedgy(x))\nforall x (Sedgy(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\n\nCrustose(laure)\n\nImmoderate(laure) and forall x (Immoderate(x) -> Sedgy(x)) -> therefore Sedgy(laure) Immoderate(laure) and Sedgy(laure) and Immoderate(laure) and Sedgy(laure) -> Outrigged(laure) -> therefore Outrigged(laure) Outrigged(laure) and Seriocomic(laure) and forall x (Outrigged(x) and Seriocomic(x) -> Crustose(x)) -> therefore Crustose(laure)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Hope is belted. Hope is substitute. Hope is stumpy. Hope is endermic. Ronnie is preferred. Ronnie is endermic. Jud is stygian. Jud is lupine. Jud is belted. Jud is preferred. Jud is substitute. Jud is endermic. Nice, belted things are lupine. If Ronnie is endermic and Ronnie is stygian then Ronnie is stumpy. Rough, preferred things are belted. All endermic things are substitute. Young things are stygian. If something is stygian and substitute then it is lupine. Ronnie is not belted.", "logic": "\nBelted(hope)\nSubstitute(hope)\nStumpy(hope)\nEndermic(hope)\nPreferred(ronnie)\nEndermic(ronnie)\nStygian(jud)\nLupine(jud)\nBelted(jud)\nPreferred(jud)\nSubstitute(jud)\nEndermic(jud)\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Belted(x) -> Lupine(x))\nEndermic(ronnie) and Stygian(ronnie) -> Stumpy(ronnie)\nforall x (Stumpy(x) and Preferred(x) -> Belted(x))\nforall x (Endermic(x) -> Substitute(x))\nforall x (Endermic(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Stygian(x) and Substitute(x) -> Lupine(x))\n\nnot Belted(ronnie)\n\nEndermic(ronnie) and forall x (Endermic(x) -> Stygian(x)) -> therefore Stygian(ronnie) Endermic(ronnie) and Stygian(ronnie) and Endermic(ronnie) and Stygian(ronnie) -> Stumpy(ronnie) -> therefore Stumpy(ronnie) Stumpy(ronnie) and Preferred(ronnie) and forall x (Stumpy(x) and Preferred(x) -> Belted(x)) -> therefore Belted(ronnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Ashleigh is stung. Ashleigh is khaki. Ashleigh is mucinous. Ashleigh is leisured. Thorny is afghan. Thorny is leisured. Chanda is sustained. Chanda is unpleasant. Chanda is stung. Chanda is afghan. Chanda is khaki. Chanda is leisured. Nice, stung things are unpleasant. If Thorny is leisured and Thorny is sustained then Thorny is mucinous. Rough, afghan things are stung. All leisured things are khaki. Young things are sustained. If something is sustained and khaki then it is unpleasant. Chanda is not mucinous.", "logic": "\nStung(ashleigh)\nKhaki(ashleigh)\nMucinous(ashleigh)\nLeisured(ashleigh)\nAfghan(thorny)\nLeisured(thorny)\nSustained(chanda)\nUnpleasant(chanda)\nStung(chanda)\nAfghan(chanda)\nKhaki(chanda)\nLeisured(chanda)\nforall x (Afghan(x) and Stung(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\nLeisured(thorny) and Sustained(thorny) -> Mucinous(thorny)\nforall x (Mucinous(x) and Afghan(x) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) -> Sustained(x))\nforall x (Sustained(x) and Khaki(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\n\nnot Mucinous(chanda)\n\nnot Mucinous(chanda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Naomi is honored. Naomi is befuddled. Naomi is anadromous. Naomi is iodinating. Genvieve is bhutanese. Genvieve is iodinating. Meir is sunny. Meir is untested. Meir is honored. Meir is bhutanese. Meir is befuddled. Meir is iodinating. Nice, honored things are untested. If Genvieve is iodinating and Genvieve is sunny then Genvieve is anadromous. Rough, bhutanese things are honored. All iodinating things are befuddled. Young things are sunny. If something is sunny and befuddled then it is untested. Naomi is bhutanese.", "logic": "\nHonored(naomi)\nBefuddled(naomi)\nAnadromous(naomi)\nIodinating(naomi)\nBhutanese(genvieve)\nIodinating(genvieve)\nSunny(meir)\nUntested(meir)\nHonored(meir)\nBhutanese(meir)\nBefuddled(meir)\nIodinating(meir)\nforall x (Bhutanese(x) and Honored(x) -> Untested(x))\nIodinating(genvieve) and Sunny(genvieve) -> Anadromous(genvieve)\nforall x (Anadromous(x) and Bhutanese(x) -> Honored(x))\nforall x (Iodinating(x) -> Befuddled(x))\nforall x (Iodinating(x) -> Sunny(x))\nforall x (Sunny(x) and Befuddled(x) -> Untested(x))\n\nBhutanese(naomi)\n\nBhutanese(naomi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Renard is bicameral. Renard is priestlike. Renard is foliated. Renard is oleophilic. Renard is biradial. Renard is scholastic. Freeman is bicameral. Freeman is foliated. Freeman is oleophilic. Freeman is scholastic. Round, bicameral people are biradial. If someone is oleophilic and priestlike then they are celibate. All bicameral, biradial people are priestlike. Renard is biradial.", "logic": "\nBicameral(renard)\nPriestlike(renard)\nFoliated(renard)\nOleophilic(renard)\nBiradial(renard)\nScholastic(renard)\nBicameral(freeman)\nFoliated(freeman)\nOleophilic(freeman)\nScholastic(freeman)\nforall x (Oleophilic(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Biradial(x))\nforall x (Oleophilic(x) and Priestlike(x) -> Celibate(x))\nforall x (Bicameral(x) and Biradial(x) -> Priestlike(x))\n\nBiradial(renard)\n\ntherefore Biradial(renard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Donielle is onetime. Donielle is prime. Donielle is submersed. Donielle is inexact. Donielle is curricular. Donielle is stupid. Ainslee is onetime. Ainslee is submersed. Ainslee is inexact. Ainslee is stupid. Round, onetime people are curricular. If someone is inexact and prime then they are nonfat. All onetime, curricular people are prime. Donielle is not stupid.", "logic": "\nOnetime(donielle)\nPrime(donielle)\nSubmersed(donielle)\nInexact(donielle)\nCurricular(donielle)\nStupid(donielle)\nOnetime(ainslee)\nSubmersed(ainslee)\nInexact(ainslee)\nStupid(ainslee)\nforall x (Inexact(x) and Onetime(x) -> Curricular(x))\nforall x (Inexact(x) and Prime(x) -> Nonfat(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) and Curricular(x) -> Prime(x))\n\nnot Stupid(donielle)\n\ntherefore Stupid(donielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Carina is takeout. Carina is aged. Carina is mean. Carina is arctic. Carina is tartaric. Carina is suckled. Ainslie is takeout. Ainslie is mean. Ainslie is arctic. Ainslie is suckled. Round, takeout people are tartaric. If someone is arctic and aged then they are functional. All takeout, tartaric people are aged. Ainslie is tartaric.", "logic": "\nTakeout(carina)\nAged(carina)\nMean(carina)\nArctic(carina)\nTartaric(carina)\nSuckled(carina)\nTakeout(ainslie)\nMean(ainslie)\nArctic(ainslie)\nSuckled(ainslie)\nforall x (Arctic(x) and Takeout(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nforall x (Arctic(x) and Aged(x) -> Functional(x))\nforall x (Takeout(x) and Tartaric(x) -> Aged(x))\n\nTartaric(ainslie)\n\nArctic(ainslie) and Takeout(ainslie) and forall x (Arctic(x) and Takeout(x) -> Tartaric(x)) -> therefore Tartaric(ainslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Matteo is shakeable. Matteo is unbecoming. Matteo is aneurysmal. Matteo is screechy. Matteo is overladen. Matteo is weightless. Randolph is shakeable. Randolph is aneurysmal. Randolph is screechy. Randolph is weightless. Round, shakeable people are overladen. If someone is screechy and unbecoming then they are primo. All shakeable, overladen people are unbecoming. Randolph is not overladen.", "logic": "\nShakeable(matteo)\nUnbecoming(matteo)\nAneurysmal(matteo)\nScreechy(matteo)\nOverladen(matteo)\nWeightless(matteo)\nShakeable(randolph)\nAneurysmal(randolph)\nScreechy(randolph)\nWeightless(randolph)\nforall x (Screechy(x) and Shakeable(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Screechy(x) and Unbecoming(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Shakeable(x) and Overladen(x) -> Unbecoming(x))\n\nnot Overladen(randolph)\n\nScreechy(randolph) and Shakeable(randolph) and forall x (Screechy(x) and Shakeable(x) -> Overladen(x)) -> therefore Overladen(randolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Carlen is obscene. Carlen is amateurish. Carlen is brusque. Carlen is doglike. Carlen is gold. Carlen is glittery. Emmit is obscene. Emmit is brusque. Emmit is doglike. Emmit is glittery. Round, obscene people are gold. If someone is doglike and amateurish then they are caesarian. All obscene, gold people are amateurish. Emmit is amateurish.", "logic": "\nObscene(carlen)\nAmateurish(carlen)\nBrusque(carlen)\nDoglike(carlen)\nGold(carlen)\nGlittery(carlen)\nObscene(emmit)\nBrusque(emmit)\nDoglike(emmit)\nGlittery(emmit)\nforall x (Doglike(x) and Obscene(x) -> Gold(x))\nforall x (Doglike(x) and Amateurish(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Obscene(x) and Gold(x) -> Amateurish(x))\n\nAmateurish(emmit)\n\nDoglike(emmit) and Obscene(emmit) and forall x (Doglike(x) and Obscene(x) -> Gold(x)) -> therefore Gold(emmit) Obscene(emmit) and Gold(emmit) and forall x (Obscene(x) and Gold(x) -> Amateurish(x)) -> therefore Amateurish(emmit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Shir is reactive. Shir is unapparent. Shir is radical. Shir is foliate. Shir is unsaddled. Shir is uncurved. Thornie is reactive. Thornie is radical. Thornie is foliate. Thornie is uncurved. Round, reactive people are unsaddled. If someone is foliate and unapparent then they are structural. All reactive, unsaddled people are unapparent. Thornie is not unapparent.", "logic": "\nReactive(shir)\nUnapparent(shir)\nRadical(shir)\nFoliate(shir)\nUnsaddled(shir)\nUncurved(shir)\nReactive(thornie)\nRadical(thornie)\nFoliate(thornie)\nUncurved(thornie)\nforall x (Foliate(x) and Reactive(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Foliate(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Structural(x))\nforall x (Reactive(x) and Unsaddled(x) -> Unapparent(x))\n\nnot Unapparent(thornie)\n\nFoliate(thornie) and Reactive(thornie) and forall x (Foliate(x) and Reactive(x) -> Unsaddled(x)) -> therefore Unsaddled(thornie) Reactive(thornie) and Unsaddled(thornie) and forall x (Reactive(x) and Unsaddled(x) -> Unapparent(x)) -> therefore Unapparent(thornie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Winni is unfruitful. Winni is gratuitous. Winni is calico. Winni is pagan. Winni is quickset. Winni is amber. Faydra is unfruitful. Faydra is calico. Faydra is pagan. Faydra is amber. Round, unfruitful people are quickset. If someone is pagan and gratuitous then they are verifiable. All unfruitful, quickset people are gratuitous. Faydra is verifiable.", "logic": "\nUnfruitful(winni)\nGratuitous(winni)\nCalico(winni)\nPagan(winni)\nQuickset(winni)\nAmber(winni)\nUnfruitful(faydra)\nCalico(faydra)\nPagan(faydra)\nAmber(faydra)\nforall x (Pagan(x) and Unfruitful(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Pagan(x) and Gratuitous(x) -> Verifiable(x))\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) and Quickset(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\n\nVerifiable(faydra)\n\nPagan(faydra) and Unfruitful(faydra) and forall x (Pagan(x) and Unfruitful(x) -> Quickset(x)) -> therefore Quickset(faydra) Unfruitful(faydra) and Quickset(faydra) and forall x (Unfruitful(x) and Quickset(x) -> Gratuitous(x)) -> therefore Gratuitous(faydra) Pagan(faydra) and Gratuitous(faydra) and forall x (Pagan(x) and Gratuitous(x) -> Verifiable(x)) -> therefore Verifiable(faydra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Gilligan is carsick. Gilligan is played. Gilligan is transient. Gilligan is rentable. Gilligan is lovesome. Gilligan is inchoate. Hoyt is carsick. Hoyt is transient. Hoyt is rentable. Hoyt is inchoate. Round, carsick people are lovesome. If someone is rentable and played then they are leading. All carsick, lovesome people are played. Hoyt is not leading.", "logic": "\nCarsick(gilligan)\nPlayed(gilligan)\nTransient(gilligan)\nRentable(gilligan)\nLovesome(gilligan)\nInchoate(gilligan)\nCarsick(hoyt)\nTransient(hoyt)\nRentable(hoyt)\nInchoate(hoyt)\nforall x (Rentable(x) and Carsick(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Rentable(x) and Played(x) -> Leading(x))\nforall x (Carsick(x) and Lovesome(x) -> Played(x))\n\nnot Leading(hoyt)\n\nRentable(hoyt) and Carsick(hoyt) and forall x (Rentable(x) and Carsick(x) -> Lovesome(x)) -> therefore Lovesome(hoyt) Carsick(hoyt) and Lovesome(hoyt) and forall x (Carsick(x) and Lovesome(x) -> Played(x)) -> therefore Played(hoyt) Rentable(hoyt) and Played(hoyt) and forall x (Rentable(x) and Played(x) -> Leading(x)) -> therefore Leading(hoyt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Ophelia is daylong. Ophelia is arrayed. Ophelia is deceitful. Ophelia is swagger. Rahal is daylong. Rahal is swagger. Tomas is daylong. Tomas is swagger. Anabelle is sheer. Anabelle is muhammadan. If someone is deceitful and muhammadan then they are not swagger. If someone is sheer then they are not swagger. If someone is daylong then they are deceitful. All sheer people are daylong. If Anabelle is deceitful then Anabelle is arrayed. If someone is sheer and not daylong then they are arrayed. Ophelia is deceitful.", "logic": "\nDaylong(ophelia)\nArrayed(ophelia)\nDeceitful(ophelia)\nSwagger(ophelia)\nDaylong(rahal)\nSwagger(rahal)\nDaylong(tomas)\nSwagger(tomas)\nSheer(anabelle)\nMuhammadan(anabelle)\nforall x (Deceitful(x) and Muhammadan(x) -> not Swagger(x))\nforall x (Sheer(x) -> not Swagger(x))\nforall x (Daylong(x) -> Deceitful(x))\nforall x (Sheer(x) -> Daylong(x))\nDeceitful(anabelle) -> Arrayed(anabelle)\nforall x (Sheer(x) and not Daylong(x) -> Arrayed(x))\n\nDeceitful(ophelia)\n\ntherefore Deceitful(ophelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Guido is bettering. Guido is jocund. Guido is assuasive. Guido is stabilised. Rowland is bettering. Rowland is stabilised. Ophelie is bettering. Ophelie is stabilised. Erny is tallish. Erny is dionysian. If someone is assuasive and dionysian then they are not stabilised. If someone is tallish then they are not stabilised. If someone is bettering then they are assuasive. All tallish people are bettering. If Erny is assuasive then Erny is jocund. If someone is tallish and not bettering then they are jocund. Ophelie is not bettering.", "logic": "\nBettering(guido)\nJocund(guido)\nAssuasive(guido)\nStabilised(guido)\nBettering(rowland)\nStabilised(rowland)\nBettering(ophelie)\nStabilised(ophelie)\nTallish(erny)\nDionysian(erny)\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and Dionysian(x) -> not Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> not Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Bettering(x) -> Assuasive(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Bettering(x))\nAssuasive(erny) -> Jocund(erny)\nforall x (Tallish(x) and not Bettering(x) -> Jocund(x))\n\nnot Bettering(ophelie)\n\ntherefore Bettering(ophelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Tedra is daunting. Tedra is cushioned. Tedra is buffeted. Tedra is departed. Nixie is daunting. Nixie is departed. Doti is daunting. Doti is departed. Prentiss is ripened. Prentiss is runny. If someone is buffeted and runny then they are not departed. If someone is ripened then they are not departed. If someone is daunting then they are buffeted. All ripened people are daunting. If Prentiss is buffeted then Prentiss is cushioned. If someone is ripened and not daunting then they are cushioned. Prentiss is not departed.", "logic": "\nDaunting(tedra)\nCushioned(tedra)\nBuffeted(tedra)\nDeparted(tedra)\nDaunting(nixie)\nDeparted(nixie)\nDaunting(doti)\nDeparted(doti)\nRipened(prentiss)\nRunny(prentiss)\nforall x (Buffeted(x) and Runny(x) -> not Departed(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> not Departed(x))\nforall x (Daunting(x) -> Buffeted(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Daunting(x))\nBuffeted(prentiss) -> Cushioned(prentiss)\nforall x (Ripened(x) and not Daunting(x) -> Cushioned(x))\n\nnot Departed(prentiss)\n\nRipened(prentiss) and forall x (Ripened(x) -> not Departed(x)) -> therefore not Departed(prentiss)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Miriam is visualised. Miriam is grecian. Miriam is alienated. Miriam is harmless. Tammara is visualised. Tammara is harmless. Granville is visualised. Granville is harmless. Theodore is inhumed. Theodore is adaptive. If someone is alienated and adaptive then they are not harmless. If someone is inhumed then they are not harmless. If someone is visualised then they are alienated. All inhumed people are visualised. If Theodore is alienated then Theodore is grecian. If someone is inhumed and not visualised then they are grecian. Tammara is not alienated.", "logic": "\nVisualised(miriam)\nGrecian(miriam)\nAlienated(miriam)\nHarmless(miriam)\nVisualised(tammara)\nHarmless(tammara)\nVisualised(granville)\nHarmless(granville)\nInhumed(theodore)\nAdaptive(theodore)\nforall x (Alienated(x) and Adaptive(x) -> not Harmless(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> not Harmless(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Visualised(x))\nAlienated(theodore) -> Grecian(theodore)\nforall x (Inhumed(x) and not Visualised(x) -> Grecian(x))\n\nnot Alienated(tammara)\n\nVisualised(tammara) and forall x (Visualised(x) -> Alienated(x)) -> therefore Alienated(tammara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Kayla is coccygeal. Kayla is spumy. Kayla is sideways. Kayla is baritone. Kassia is coccygeal. Kassia is baritone. Jordana is coccygeal. Jordana is baritone. Kamillah is conserved. Kamillah is spirited. If someone is sideways and spirited then they are not baritone. If someone is conserved then they are not baritone. If someone is coccygeal then they are sideways. All conserved people are coccygeal. If Kamillah is sideways then Kamillah is spumy. If someone is conserved and not coccygeal then they are spumy. Kamillah is sideways.", "logic": "\nCoccygeal(kayla)\nSpumy(kayla)\nSideways(kayla)\nBaritone(kayla)\nCoccygeal(kassia)\nBaritone(kassia)\nCoccygeal(jordana)\nBaritone(jordana)\nConserved(kamillah)\nSpirited(kamillah)\nforall x (Sideways(x) and Spirited(x) -> not Baritone(x))\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> not Baritone(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Coccygeal(x))\nSideways(kamillah) -> Spumy(kamillah)\nforall x (Conserved(x) and not Coccygeal(x) -> Spumy(x))\n\nSideways(kamillah)\n\nConserved(kamillah) and forall x (Conserved(x) -> Coccygeal(x)) -> therefore Coccygeal(kamillah) Coccygeal(kamillah) and forall x (Coccygeal(x) -> Sideways(x)) -> therefore Sideways(kamillah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Dione is ascensive. Dione is sufficient. Dione is faithful. Dione is hangdog. Hildy is ascensive. Hildy is hangdog. Phil is ascensive. Phil is hangdog. Jobey is thin. Jobey is odourless. If someone is faithful and odourless then they are not hangdog. If someone is thin then they are not hangdog. If someone is ascensive then they are faithful. All thin people are ascensive. If Jobey is faithful then Jobey is sufficient. If someone is thin and not ascensive then they are sufficient. Jobey is not faithful.", "logic": "\nAscensive(dione)\nSufficient(dione)\nFaithful(dione)\nHangdog(dione)\nAscensive(hildy)\nHangdog(hildy)\nAscensive(phil)\nHangdog(phil)\nThin(jobey)\nOdourless(jobey)\nforall x (Faithful(x) and Odourless(x) -> not Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Thin(x) -> not Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Faithful(x))\nforall x (Thin(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nFaithful(jobey) -> Sufficient(jobey)\nforall x (Thin(x) and not Ascensive(x) -> Sufficient(x))\n\nnot Faithful(jobey)\n\nThin(jobey) and forall x (Thin(x) -> Ascensive(x)) -> therefore Ascensive(jobey) Ascensive(jobey) and forall x (Ascensive(x) -> Faithful(x)) -> therefore Faithful(jobey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Harris is manful. Harris is bipinnate. Harris is unsanded. Harris is jealous. Nonnah is manful. Nonnah is jealous. Cyndy is manful. Cyndy is jealous. Upton is stonelike. Upton is unpleasant. If someone is unsanded and unpleasant then they are not jealous. If someone is stonelike then they are not jealous. If someone is manful then they are unsanded. All stonelike people are manful. If Upton is unsanded then Upton is bipinnate. If someone is stonelike and not manful then they are bipinnate. Upton is bipinnate.", "logic": "\nManful(harris)\nBipinnate(harris)\nUnsanded(harris)\nJealous(harris)\nManful(nonnah)\nJealous(nonnah)\nManful(cyndy)\nJealous(cyndy)\nStonelike(upton)\nUnpleasant(upton)\nforall x (Unsanded(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> not Jealous(x))\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> not Jealous(x))\nforall x (Manful(x) -> Unsanded(x))\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> Manful(x))\nUnsanded(upton) -> Bipinnate(upton)\nforall x (Stonelike(x) and not Manful(x) -> Bipinnate(x))\n\nBipinnate(upton)\n\nStonelike(upton) and forall x (Stonelike(x) -> Manful(x)) -> therefore Manful(upton) Manful(upton) and forall x (Manful(x) -> Unsanded(x)) -> therefore Unsanded(upton) Unsanded(upton) and Unsanded(upton) -> Bipinnate(upton) -> therefore Bipinnate(upton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Caren is webbed. Caren is delineate. Caren is aeriform. Caren is chargeable. Jehanna is webbed. Jehanna is chargeable. Harold is webbed. Harold is chargeable. Genni is anaclinal. Genni is unpillared. If someone is aeriform and unpillared then they are not chargeable. If someone is anaclinal then they are not chargeable. If someone is webbed then they are aeriform. All anaclinal people are webbed. If Genni is aeriform then Genni is delineate. If someone is anaclinal and not webbed then they are delineate. Genni is not delineate.", "logic": "\nWebbed(caren)\nDelineate(caren)\nAeriform(caren)\nChargeable(caren)\nWebbed(jehanna)\nChargeable(jehanna)\nWebbed(harold)\nChargeable(harold)\nAnaclinal(genni)\nUnpillared(genni)\nforall x (Aeriform(x) and Unpillared(x) -> not Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) -> not Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Webbed(x) -> Aeriform(x))\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) -> Webbed(x))\nAeriform(genni) -> Delineate(genni)\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) and not Webbed(x) -> Delineate(x))\n\nnot Delineate(genni)\n\nAnaclinal(genni) and forall x (Anaclinal(x) -> Webbed(x)) -> therefore Webbed(genni) Webbed(genni) and forall x (Webbed(x) -> Aeriform(x)) -> therefore Aeriform(genni) Aeriform(genni) and Aeriform(genni) -> Delineate(genni) -> therefore Delineate(genni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Kassie is slatternly. Kassie is untimely. Kassie is million. Kassie is muddy. Reube is slatternly. Reube is muddy. Maddy is slatternly. Maddy is muddy. Jed is uxorious. Jed is flamboyant. If someone is million and flamboyant then they are not muddy. If someone is uxorious then they are not muddy. If someone is slatternly then they are million. All uxorious people are slatternly. If Jed is million then Jed is untimely. If someone is uxorious and not slatternly then they are untimely. Reube is not untimely.", "logic": "\nSlatternly(kassie)\nUntimely(kassie)\nMillion(kassie)\nMuddy(kassie)\nSlatternly(reube)\nMuddy(reube)\nSlatternly(maddy)\nMuddy(maddy)\nUxorious(jed)\nFlamboyant(jed)\nforall x (Million(x) and Flamboyant(x) -> not Muddy(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) -> not Muddy(x))\nforall x (Slatternly(x) -> Million(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) -> Slatternly(x))\nMillion(jed) -> Untimely(jed)\nforall x (Uxorious(x) and not Slatternly(x) -> Untimely(x))\n\nnot Untimely(reube)\n\nforall x (Uxorious(x) and not Slatternly(x) -> Untimely(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Rebbecca is antacid. Rebbecca is pleading. Rebbecca is histologic. Rebbecca is valid. Vivienne is antacid. Vivienne is valid. Ruella is antacid. Ruella is valid. Emilia is additive. Emilia is myotic. If someone is histologic and myotic then they are not valid. If someone is additive then they are not valid. If someone is antacid then they are histologic. All additive people are antacid. If Emilia is histologic then Emilia is pleading. If someone is additive and not antacid then they are pleading. Ruella is pleading.", "logic": "\nAntacid(rebbecca)\nPleading(rebbecca)\nHistologic(rebbecca)\nValid(rebbecca)\nAntacid(vivienne)\nValid(vivienne)\nAntacid(ruella)\nValid(ruella)\nAdditive(emilia)\nMyotic(emilia)\nforall x (Histologic(x) and Myotic(x) -> not Valid(x))\nforall x (Additive(x) -> not Valid(x))\nforall x (Antacid(x) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Additive(x) -> Antacid(x))\nHistologic(emilia) -> Pleading(emilia)\nforall x (Additive(x) and not Antacid(x) -> Pleading(x))\n\nPleading(ruella)\n\nforall x (Additive(x) and not Antacid(x) -> Pleading(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Shaun is astral. Shaun is combinable. Shaun is suburban. Shaun is asterismal. Nevile is astral. Nevile is asterismal. Kayla is astral. Kayla is asterismal. Kira is postmortem. Kira is tractable. If someone is suburban and tractable then they are not asterismal. If someone is postmortem then they are not asterismal. If someone is astral then they are suburban. All postmortem people are astral. If Kira is suburban then Kira is combinable. If someone is postmortem and not astral then they are combinable. Nevile is not smart.", "logic": "\nAstral(shaun)\nCombinable(shaun)\nSuburban(shaun)\nAsterismal(shaun)\nAstral(nevile)\nAsterismal(nevile)\nAstral(kayla)\nAsterismal(kayla)\nPostmortem(kira)\nTractable(kira)\nforall x (Suburban(x) and Tractable(x) -> not Asterismal(x))\nforall x (Postmortem(x) -> not Asterismal(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) -> Suburban(x))\nforall x (Postmortem(x) -> Astral(x))\nSuburban(kira) -> Combinable(kira)\nforall x (Postmortem(x) and not Astral(x) -> Combinable(x))\n\nnot Smart(nevile)\n\nnot Smart(nevile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Adams is russian. Adams is hedged. Adams is directed. Adams is slipshod. Gracie is russian. Gracie is slipshod. Caleb is russian. Caleb is slipshod. Verile is buoyant. Verile is labile. If someone is directed and labile then they are not slipshod. If someone is buoyant then they are not slipshod. If someone is russian then they are directed. All buoyant people are russian. If Verile is directed then Verile is hedged. If someone is buoyant and not russian then they are hedged. Caleb is labile.", "logic": "\nRussian(adams)\nHedged(adams)\nDirected(adams)\nSlipshod(adams)\nRussian(gracie)\nSlipshod(gracie)\nRussian(caleb)\nSlipshod(caleb)\nBuoyant(verile)\nLabile(verile)\nforall x (Directed(x) and Labile(x) -> not Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> not Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Russian(x) -> Directed(x))\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> Russian(x))\nDirected(verile) -> Hedged(verile)\nforall x (Buoyant(x) and not Russian(x) -> Hedged(x))\n\nLabile(caleb)\n\nLabile(caleb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Stephen is engraved. Stephen is adjusted. Stephen is norman. Stephen is fourteen. Harrie is engraved. Harrie is fourteen. Fulvia is engraved. Fulvia is fourteen. Izzi is parthian. Izzi is bionomic. If someone is norman and bionomic then they are not fourteen. If someone is parthian then they are not fourteen. If someone is engraved then they are norman. All parthian people are engraved. If Izzi is norman then Izzi is adjusted. If someone is parthian and not engraved then they are adjusted. Stephen is not parthian.", "logic": "\nEngraved(stephen)\nAdjusted(stephen)\nNorman(stephen)\nFourteen(stephen)\nEngraved(harrie)\nFourteen(harrie)\nEngraved(fulvia)\nFourteen(fulvia)\nParthian(izzi)\nBionomic(izzi)\nforall x (Norman(x) and Bionomic(x) -> not Fourteen(x))\nforall x (Parthian(x) -> not Fourteen(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Norman(x))\nforall x (Parthian(x) -> Engraved(x))\nNorman(izzi) -> Adjusted(izzi)\nforall x (Parthian(x) and not Engraved(x) -> Adjusted(x))\n\nnot Parthian(stephen)\n\nnot Parthian(stephen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Athene is rancid. Athene is arable. Athene is indoor. Athene is homologic. Aliza is rancid. Aliza is homologic. Zora is rancid. Zora is homologic. Dryke is evergreen. Dryke is wonted. If someone is indoor and wonted then they are not homologic. If someone is evergreen then they are not homologic. If someone is rancid then they are indoor. All evergreen people are rancid. If Dryke is indoor then Dryke is arable. If someone is evergreen and not rancid then they are arable. Zora is smart.", "logic": "\nRancid(athene)\nArable(athene)\nIndoor(athene)\nHomologic(athene)\nRancid(aliza)\nHomologic(aliza)\nRancid(zora)\nHomologic(zora)\nEvergreen(dryke)\nWonted(dryke)\nforall x (Indoor(x) and Wonted(x) -> not Homologic(x))\nforall x (Evergreen(x) -> not Homologic(x))\nforall x (Rancid(x) -> Indoor(x))\nforall x (Evergreen(x) -> Rancid(x))\nIndoor(dryke) -> Arable(dryke)\nforall x (Evergreen(x) and not Rancid(x) -> Arable(x))\n\nSmart(zora)\n\nSmart(zora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Garnet is handsewn. Garnet is unclogged. Garnet is chalybeate. Garnet is adaptable. Donielle is handsewn. Donielle is adaptable. Domenico is handsewn. Domenico is adaptable. Lianna is arminian. Lianna is bounderish. If someone is chalybeate and bounderish then they are not adaptable. If someone is arminian then they are not adaptable. If someone is handsewn then they are chalybeate. All arminian people are handsewn. If Lianna is chalybeate then Lianna is unclogged. If someone is arminian and not handsewn then they are unclogged. Garnet is not bounderish.", "logic": "\nHandsewn(garnet)\nUnclogged(garnet)\nChalybeate(garnet)\nAdaptable(garnet)\nHandsewn(donielle)\nAdaptable(donielle)\nHandsewn(domenico)\nAdaptable(domenico)\nArminian(lianna)\nBounderish(lianna)\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) and Bounderish(x) -> not Adaptable(x))\nforall x (Arminian(x) -> not Adaptable(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Arminian(x) -> Handsewn(x))\nChalybeate(lianna) -> Unclogged(lianna)\nforall x (Arminian(x) and not Handsewn(x) -> Unclogged(x))\n\nnot Bounderish(garnet)\n\nnot Bounderish(garnet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Morrie is mucky. Morrie is harsh. Morrie is seventeen. Morrie is incensed. Vikkie is mucky. Vikkie is incensed. Vilma is mucky. Vilma is incensed. Lincoln is ramate. Lincoln is proclaimed. If someone is seventeen and proclaimed then they are not incensed. If someone is ramate then they are not incensed. If someone is mucky then they are seventeen. All ramate people are mucky. If Lincoln is seventeen then Lincoln is harsh. If someone is ramate and not mucky then they are harsh. Vikkie is ramate.", "logic": "\nMucky(morrie)\nHarsh(morrie)\nSeventeen(morrie)\nIncensed(morrie)\nMucky(vikkie)\nIncensed(vikkie)\nMucky(vilma)\nIncensed(vilma)\nRamate(lincoln)\nProclaimed(lincoln)\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and Proclaimed(x) -> not Incensed(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> not Incensed(x))\nforall x (Mucky(x) -> Seventeen(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> Mucky(x))\nSeventeen(lincoln) -> Harsh(lincoln)\nforall x (Ramate(x) and not Mucky(x) -> Harsh(x))\n\nRamate(vikkie)\n\nRamate(vikkie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "The lefty erode the tab. The lefty is witting. The lefty is albinotic. The lefty is unfrozen. The lefty eschew the crawford. The lefty await the crawford. The alysa eschew the lefty. The alysa eschew the crawford. The alysa await the lefty. The alysa await the tab. The crawford is unfrozen. The tab erode the lefty. The tab erode the crawford. The tab is meaty. The tab eschew the lefty. The tab eschew the crawford. If something eschew the lefty then it erode the crawford. If something erode the lefty then it erode the tab. If something eschew the lefty and it erode the tab then the lefty eschew the alysa. If something await the alysa and the alysa erode the crawford then the crawford is albinotic. If something is witting and it eschew the alysa then it erode the lefty. If something erode the lefty and it eschew the lefty then it await the crawford. The tab erode the crawford.", "logic": "\nErode(lefty, tab)\nWitting(lefty)\nAlbinotic(lefty)\nUnfrozen(lefty)\nEschew(lefty, crawford)\nAwait(lefty, crawford)\nEschew(alysa, lefty)\nEschew(alysa, crawford)\nAwait(alysa, lefty)\nAwait(alysa, tab)\nUnfrozen(crawford)\nErode(tab, lefty)\nErode(tab, crawford)\nMeaty(tab)\nEschew(tab, lefty)\nEschew(tab, crawford)\nforall x (Eschew(x, lefty) -> Erode(x, crawford))\nforall x (Erode(x, lefty) -> Erode(x, tab))\nforall x (Eschew(x, lefty) and Erode(x, tab) -> Eschew(lefty, alysa))\nforall x (Await(x, alysa) and Erode(alysa, crawford) -> Albinotic(crawford))\nforall x (Witting(x) and Eschew(x, alysa) -> Erode(x, lefty))\nforall x (Erode(x, lefty) and Eschew(x, lefty) -> Await(x, crawford))\n\nErode(tab, crawford)\n\ntherefore Erode(tab, crawford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The minnie regorge the eva. The minnie is ungarbed. The minnie is rural. The minnie is unladylike. The minnie cackle the zachariah. The minnie gestate the zachariah. The nina cackle the minnie. The nina cackle the zachariah. The nina gestate the minnie. The nina gestate the eva. The zachariah is unladylike. The eva regorge the minnie. The eva regorge the zachariah. The eva is umptieth. The eva cackle the minnie. The eva cackle the zachariah. If something cackle the minnie then it regorge the zachariah. If something regorge the minnie then it regorge the eva. If something cackle the minnie and it regorge the eva then the minnie cackle the nina. If something gestate the nina and the nina regorge the zachariah then the zachariah is rural. If something is ungarbed and it cackle the nina then it regorge the minnie. If something regorge the minnie and it cackle the minnie then it gestate the zachariah. The eva does not like the minnie.", "logic": "\nRegorge(minnie, eva)\nUngarbed(minnie)\nRural(minnie)\nUnladylike(minnie)\nCackle(minnie, zachariah)\nGestate(minnie, zachariah)\nCackle(nina, minnie)\nCackle(nina, zachariah)\nGestate(nina, minnie)\nGestate(nina, eva)\nUnladylike(zachariah)\nRegorge(eva, minnie)\nRegorge(eva, zachariah)\nUmptieth(eva)\nCackle(eva, minnie)\nCackle(eva, zachariah)\nforall x (Cackle(x, minnie) -> Regorge(x, zachariah))\nforall x (Regorge(x, minnie) -> Regorge(x, eva))\nforall x (Cackle(x, minnie) and Regorge(x, eva) -> Cackle(minnie, nina))\nforall x (Gestate(x, nina) and Regorge(nina, zachariah) -> Rural(zachariah))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) and Cackle(x, nina) -> Regorge(x, minnie))\nforall x (Regorge(x, minnie) and Cackle(x, minnie) -> Gestate(x, zachariah))\n\nnot Cackle(eva, minnie)\n\ntherefore Cackle(eva, minnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The ferguson dissuade the leone. The ferguson is inviolate. The ferguson is exciting. The ferguson is evaporated. The ferguson muffle the maire. The ferguson colourise the maire. The calli muffle the ferguson. The calli muffle the maire. The calli colourise the ferguson. The calli colourise the leone. The maire is evaporated. The leone dissuade the ferguson. The leone dissuade the maire. The leone is furtive. The leone muffle the ferguson. The leone muffle the maire. If something muffle the ferguson then it dissuade the maire. If something dissuade the ferguson then it dissuade the leone. If something muffle the ferguson and it dissuade the leone then the ferguson muffle the calli. If something colourise the calli and the calli dissuade the maire then the maire is exciting. If something is inviolate and it muffle the calli then it dissuade the ferguson. If something dissuade the ferguson and it muffle the ferguson then it colourise the maire. The leone dissuade the leone.", "logic": "\nDissuade(ferguson, leone)\nInviolate(ferguson)\nExciting(ferguson)\nEvaporated(ferguson)\nMuffle(ferguson, maire)\nColourise(ferguson, maire)\nMuffle(calli, ferguson)\nMuffle(calli, maire)\nColourise(calli, ferguson)\nColourise(calli, leone)\nEvaporated(maire)\nDissuade(leone, ferguson)\nDissuade(leone, maire)\nFurtive(leone)\nMuffle(leone, ferguson)\nMuffle(leone, maire)\nforall x (Muffle(x, ferguson) -> Dissuade(x, maire))\nforall x (Dissuade(x, ferguson) -> Dissuade(x, leone))\nforall x (Muffle(x, ferguson) and Dissuade(x, leone) -> Muffle(ferguson, calli))\nforall x (Colourise(x, calli) and Dissuade(calli, maire) -> Exciting(maire))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) and Muffle(x, calli) -> Dissuade(x, ferguson))\nforall x (Dissuade(x, ferguson) and Muffle(x, ferguson) -> Colourise(x, maire))\n\nDissuade(leone, leone)\n\nDissuade(leone, ferguson) and forall x (Dissuade(x, ferguson) -> Dissuade(x, leone)) -> therefore Dissuade(leone, leone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The gretna function the vladimir. The gretna is flawless. The gretna is german. The gretna is orgiastic. The gretna simonise the zelma. The gretna kennel the zelma. The stanleigh simonise the gretna. The stanleigh simonise the zelma. The stanleigh kennel the gretna. The stanleigh kennel the vladimir. The zelma is orgiastic. The vladimir function the gretna. The vladimir function the zelma. The vladimir is apoplectic. The vladimir simonise the gretna. The vladimir simonise the zelma. If something simonise the gretna then it function the zelma. If something function the gretna then it function the vladimir. If something simonise the gretna and it function the vladimir then the gretna simonise the stanleigh. If something kennel the stanleigh and the stanleigh function the zelma then the zelma is german. If something is flawless and it simonise the stanleigh then it function the gretna. If something function the gretna and it simonise the gretna then it kennel the zelma. The stanleigh does not eat the zelma.", "logic": "\nFunction(gretna, vladimir)\nFlawless(gretna)\nGerman(gretna)\nOrgiastic(gretna)\nSimonise(gretna, zelma)\nKennel(gretna, zelma)\nSimonise(stanleigh, gretna)\nSimonise(stanleigh, zelma)\nKennel(stanleigh, gretna)\nKennel(stanleigh, vladimir)\nOrgiastic(zelma)\nFunction(vladimir, gretna)\nFunction(vladimir, zelma)\nApoplectic(vladimir)\nSimonise(vladimir, gretna)\nSimonise(vladimir, zelma)\nforall x (Simonise(x, gretna) -> Function(x, zelma))\nforall x (Function(x, gretna) -> Function(x, vladimir))\nforall x (Simonise(x, gretna) and Function(x, vladimir) -> Simonise(gretna, stanleigh))\nforall x (Kennel(x, stanleigh) and Function(stanleigh, zelma) -> German(zelma))\nforall x (Flawless(x) and Simonise(x, stanleigh) -> Function(x, gretna))\nforall x (Function(x, gretna) and Simonise(x, gretna) -> Kennel(x, zelma))\n\nnot Function(stanleigh, zelma)\n\nSimonise(stanleigh, gretna) and forall x (Simonise(x, gretna) -> Function(x, zelma)) -> therefore Function(stanleigh, zelma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The rebekkah hurtle the eva. The rebekkah is downscale. The rebekkah is arching. The rebekkah is enough. The rebekkah abnegate the milzie. The rebekkah sabotage the milzie. The zabrina abnegate the rebekkah. The zabrina abnegate the milzie. The zabrina sabotage the rebekkah. The zabrina sabotage the eva. The milzie is enough. The eva hurtle the rebekkah. The eva hurtle the milzie. The eva is achievable. The eva abnegate the rebekkah. The eva abnegate the milzie. If something abnegate the rebekkah then it hurtle the milzie. If something hurtle the rebekkah then it hurtle the eva. If something abnegate the rebekkah and it hurtle the eva then the rebekkah abnegate the zabrina. If something sabotage the zabrina and the zabrina hurtle the milzie then the milzie is arching. If something is downscale and it abnegate the zabrina then it hurtle the rebekkah. If something hurtle the rebekkah and it abnegate the rebekkah then it sabotage the milzie. The rebekkah abnegate the zabrina.", "logic": "\nHurtle(rebekkah, eva)\nDownscale(rebekkah)\nArching(rebekkah)\nEnough(rebekkah)\nAbnegate(rebekkah, milzie)\nSabotage(rebekkah, milzie)\nAbnegate(zabrina, rebekkah)\nAbnegate(zabrina, milzie)\nSabotage(zabrina, rebekkah)\nSabotage(zabrina, eva)\nEnough(milzie)\nHurtle(eva, rebekkah)\nHurtle(eva, milzie)\nAchievable(eva)\nAbnegate(eva, rebekkah)\nAbnegate(eva, milzie)\nforall x (Abnegate(x, rebekkah) -> Hurtle(x, milzie))\nforall x (Hurtle(x, rebekkah) -> Hurtle(x, eva))\nforall x (Abnegate(x, rebekkah) and Hurtle(x, eva) -> Abnegate(rebekkah, zabrina))\nforall x (Sabotage(x, zabrina) and Hurtle(zabrina, milzie) -> Arching(milzie))\nforall x (Downscale(x) and Abnegate(x, zabrina) -> Hurtle(x, rebekkah))\nforall x (Hurtle(x, rebekkah) and Abnegate(x, rebekkah) -> Sabotage(x, milzie))\n\nAbnegate(rebekkah, zabrina)\n\nHurtle(eva, rebekkah) and forall x (Hurtle(x, rebekkah) -> Hurtle(x, eva)) -> therefore Hurtle(eva, eva) Abnegate(eva, rebekkah) and Hurtle(eva, eva) and forall x (Abnegate(x, rebekkah) and Hurtle(x, eva) -> Abnegate(rebekkah, zabrina)) -> therefore Abnegate(rebekkah, zabrina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The andrus sneer the skelly. The andrus is north. The andrus is occurrent. The andrus is cephalic. The andrus will the grady. The andrus belong the grady. The willette will the andrus. The willette will the grady. The willette belong the andrus. The willette belong the skelly. The grady is cephalic. The skelly sneer the andrus. The skelly sneer the grady. The skelly is relaxant. The skelly will the andrus. The skelly will the grady. If something will the andrus then it sneer the grady. If something sneer the andrus then it sneer the skelly. If something will the andrus and it sneer the skelly then the andrus will the willette. If something belong the willette and the willette sneer the grady then the grady is occurrent. If something is north and it will the willette then it sneer the andrus. If something sneer the andrus and it will the andrus then it belong the grady. The andrus does not like the willette.", "logic": "\nSneer(andrus, skelly)\nNorth(andrus)\nOccurrent(andrus)\nCephalic(andrus)\nWill(andrus, grady)\nBelong(andrus, grady)\nWill(willette, andrus)\nWill(willette, grady)\nBelong(willette, andrus)\nBelong(willette, skelly)\nCephalic(grady)\nSneer(skelly, andrus)\nSneer(skelly, grady)\nRelaxant(skelly)\nWill(skelly, andrus)\nWill(skelly, grady)\nforall x (Will(x, andrus) -> Sneer(x, grady))\nforall x (Sneer(x, andrus) -> Sneer(x, skelly))\nforall x (Will(x, andrus) and Sneer(x, skelly) -> Will(andrus, willette))\nforall x (Belong(x, willette) and Sneer(willette, grady) -> Occurrent(grady))\nforall x (North(x) and Will(x, willette) -> Sneer(x, andrus))\nforall x (Sneer(x, andrus) and Will(x, andrus) -> Belong(x, grady))\n\nnot Will(andrus, willette)\n\nSneer(skelly, andrus) and forall x (Sneer(x, andrus) -> Sneer(x, skelly)) -> therefore Sneer(skelly, skelly) Will(skelly, andrus) and Sneer(skelly, skelly) and forall x (Will(x, andrus) and Sneer(x, skelly) -> Will(andrus, willette)) -> therefore Will(andrus, willette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The holly minimize the keely. The holly is calced. The holly is pestered. The holly is overbusy. The holly enthrall the karlen. The holly victual the karlen. The rosetta enthrall the holly. The rosetta enthrall the karlen. The rosetta victual the holly. The rosetta victual the keely. The karlen is overbusy. The keely minimize the holly. The keely minimize the karlen. The keely is porticoed. The keely enthrall the holly. The keely enthrall the karlen. If something enthrall the holly then it minimize the karlen. If something minimize the holly then it minimize the keely. If something enthrall the holly and it minimize the keely then the holly enthrall the rosetta. If something victual the rosetta and the rosetta minimize the karlen then the karlen is pestered. If something is calced and it enthrall the rosetta then it minimize the holly. If something minimize the holly and it enthrall the holly then it victual the karlen. The holly minimize the holly.", "logic": "\nMinimize(holly, keely)\nCalced(holly)\nPestered(holly)\nOverbusy(holly)\nEnthrall(holly, karlen)\nVictual(holly, karlen)\nEnthrall(rosetta, holly)\nEnthrall(rosetta, karlen)\nVictual(rosetta, holly)\nVictual(rosetta, keely)\nOverbusy(karlen)\nMinimize(keely, holly)\nMinimize(keely, karlen)\nPorticoed(keely)\nEnthrall(keely, holly)\nEnthrall(keely, karlen)\nforall x (Enthrall(x, holly) -> Minimize(x, karlen))\nforall x (Minimize(x, holly) -> Minimize(x, keely))\nforall x (Enthrall(x, holly) and Minimize(x, keely) -> Enthrall(holly, rosetta))\nforall x (Victual(x, rosetta) and Minimize(rosetta, karlen) -> Pestered(karlen))\nforall x (Calced(x) and Enthrall(x, rosetta) -> Minimize(x, holly))\nforall x (Minimize(x, holly) and Enthrall(x, holly) -> Victual(x, karlen))\n\nMinimize(holly, holly)\n\nMinimize(keely, holly) and forall x (Minimize(x, holly) -> Minimize(x, keely)) -> therefore Minimize(keely, keely) Enthrall(keely, holly) and Minimize(keely, keely) and forall x (Enthrall(x, holly) and Minimize(x, keely) -> Enthrall(holly, rosetta)) -> therefore Enthrall(holly, rosetta) Calced(holly) and Enthrall(holly, rosetta) and forall x (Calced(x) and Enthrall(x, rosetta) -> Minimize(x, holly)) -> therefore Minimize(holly, holly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The aimee preserve the vaclav. The aimee is twiggy. The aimee is copular. The aimee is biconvex. The aimee excrete the sharl. The aimee revitalise the sharl. The aldus excrete the aimee. The aldus excrete the sharl. The aldus revitalise the aimee. The aldus revitalise the vaclav. The sharl is biconvex. The vaclav preserve the aimee. The vaclav preserve the sharl. The vaclav is squashy. The vaclav excrete the aimee. The vaclav excrete the sharl. If something excrete the aimee then it preserve the sharl. If something preserve the aimee then it preserve the vaclav. If something excrete the aimee and it preserve the vaclav then the aimee excrete the aldus. If something revitalise the aldus and the aldus preserve the sharl then the sharl is copular. If something is twiggy and it excrete the aldus then it preserve the aimee. If something preserve the aimee and it excrete the aimee then it revitalise the sharl. The aimee does not eat the aimee.", "logic": "\nPreserve(aimee, vaclav)\nTwiggy(aimee)\nCopular(aimee)\nBiconvex(aimee)\nExcrete(aimee, sharl)\nRevitalise(aimee, sharl)\nExcrete(aldus, aimee)\nExcrete(aldus, sharl)\nRevitalise(aldus, aimee)\nRevitalise(aldus, vaclav)\nBiconvex(sharl)\nPreserve(vaclav, aimee)\nPreserve(vaclav, sharl)\nSquashy(vaclav)\nExcrete(vaclav, aimee)\nExcrete(vaclav, sharl)\nforall x (Excrete(x, aimee) -> Preserve(x, sharl))\nforall x (Preserve(x, aimee) -> Preserve(x, vaclav))\nforall x (Excrete(x, aimee) and Preserve(x, vaclav) -> Excrete(aimee, aldus))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, aldus) and Preserve(aldus, sharl) -> Copular(sharl))\nforall x (Twiggy(x) and Excrete(x, aldus) -> Preserve(x, aimee))\nforall x (Preserve(x, aimee) and Excrete(x, aimee) -> Revitalise(x, sharl))\n\nnot Preserve(aimee, aimee)\n\nPreserve(vaclav, aimee) and forall x (Preserve(x, aimee) -> Preserve(x, vaclav)) -> therefore Preserve(vaclav, vaclav) Excrete(vaclav, aimee) and Preserve(vaclav, vaclav) and forall x (Excrete(x, aimee) and Preserve(x, vaclav) -> Excrete(aimee, aldus)) -> therefore Excrete(aimee, aldus) Twiggy(aimee) and Excrete(aimee, aldus) and forall x (Twiggy(x) and Excrete(x, aldus) -> Preserve(x, aimee)) -> therefore Preserve(aimee, aimee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The suzie nose the selie. The suzie is directing. The suzie is occlusive. The suzie is apivorous. The suzie reflate the amery. The suzie rethink the amery. The cheslie reflate the suzie. The cheslie reflate the amery. The cheslie rethink the suzie. The cheslie rethink the selie. The amery is apivorous. The selie nose the suzie. The selie nose the amery. The selie is depressant. The selie reflate the suzie. The selie reflate the amery. If something reflate the suzie then it nose the amery. If something nose the suzie then it nose the selie. If something reflate the suzie and it nose the selie then the suzie reflate the cheslie. If something rethink the cheslie and the cheslie nose the amery then the amery is occlusive. If something is directing and it reflate the cheslie then it nose the suzie. If something nose the suzie and it reflate the suzie then it rethink the amery. The suzie does not eat the amery.", "logic": "\nNose(suzie, selie)\nDirecting(suzie)\nOcclusive(suzie)\nApivorous(suzie)\nReflate(suzie, amery)\nRethink(suzie, amery)\nReflate(cheslie, suzie)\nReflate(cheslie, amery)\nRethink(cheslie, suzie)\nRethink(cheslie, selie)\nApivorous(amery)\nNose(selie, suzie)\nNose(selie, amery)\nDepressant(selie)\nReflate(selie, suzie)\nReflate(selie, amery)\nforall x (Reflate(x, suzie) -> Nose(x, amery))\nforall x (Nose(x, suzie) -> Nose(x, selie))\nforall x (Reflate(x, suzie) and Nose(x, selie) -> Reflate(suzie, cheslie))\nforall x (Rethink(x, cheslie) and Nose(cheslie, amery) -> Occlusive(amery))\nforall x (Directing(x) and Reflate(x, cheslie) -> Nose(x, suzie))\nforall x (Nose(x, suzie) and Reflate(x, suzie) -> Rethink(x, amery))\n\nnot Nose(suzie, amery)\n\nforall x (Reflate(x, suzie) -> Nose(x, amery)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The wolfram provide the carmelle. The wolfram is heretical. The wolfram is tameable. The wolfram is fifth. The wolfram smell the kattie. The wolfram admire the kattie. The andromeda smell the wolfram. The andromeda smell the kattie. The andromeda admire the wolfram. The andromeda admire the carmelle. The kattie is fifth. The carmelle provide the wolfram. The carmelle provide the kattie. The carmelle is reniform. The carmelle smell the wolfram. The carmelle smell the kattie. If something smell the wolfram then it provide the kattie. If something provide the wolfram then it provide the carmelle. If something smell the wolfram and it provide the carmelle then the wolfram smell the andromeda. If something admire the andromeda and the andromeda provide the kattie then the kattie is tameable. If something is heretical and it smell the andromeda then it provide the wolfram. If something provide the wolfram and it smell the wolfram then it admire the kattie. The andromeda provide the carmelle.", "logic": "\nProvide(wolfram, carmelle)\nHeretical(wolfram)\nTameable(wolfram)\nFifth(wolfram)\nSmell(wolfram, kattie)\nAdmire(wolfram, kattie)\nSmell(andromeda, wolfram)\nSmell(andromeda, kattie)\nAdmire(andromeda, wolfram)\nAdmire(andromeda, carmelle)\nFifth(kattie)\nProvide(carmelle, wolfram)\nProvide(carmelle, kattie)\nReniform(carmelle)\nSmell(carmelle, wolfram)\nSmell(carmelle, kattie)\nforall x (Smell(x, wolfram) -> Provide(x, kattie))\nforall x (Provide(x, wolfram) -> Provide(x, carmelle))\nforall x (Smell(x, wolfram) and Provide(x, carmelle) -> Smell(wolfram, andromeda))\nforall x (Admire(x, andromeda) and Provide(andromeda, kattie) -> Tameable(kattie))\nforall x (Heretical(x) and Smell(x, andromeda) -> Provide(x, wolfram))\nforall x (Provide(x, wolfram) and Smell(x, wolfram) -> Admire(x, kattie))\n\nProvide(andromeda, carmelle)\n\nforall x (Provide(x, wolfram) -> Provide(x, carmelle)) <- forall x (Heretical(x) and Smell(x, andromeda) -> Provide(x, wolfram)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The corrine resole the roth. The corrine is myelinic. The corrine is rococo. The corrine is ovarian. The corrine catalyse the jonis. The corrine skank the jonis. The phil catalyse the corrine. The phil catalyse the jonis. The phil skank the corrine. The phil skank the roth. The jonis is ovarian. The roth resole the corrine. The roth resole the jonis. The roth is firsthand. The roth catalyse the corrine. The roth catalyse the jonis. If something catalyse the corrine then it resole the jonis. If something resole the corrine then it resole the roth. If something catalyse the corrine and it resole the roth then the corrine catalyse the phil. If something skank the phil and the phil resole the jonis then the jonis is rococo. If something is myelinic and it catalyse the phil then it resole the corrine. If something resole the corrine and it catalyse the corrine then it skank the jonis. The jonis does not eat the jonis.", "logic": "\nResole(corrine, roth)\nMyelinic(corrine)\nRococo(corrine)\nOvarian(corrine)\nCatalyse(corrine, jonis)\nSkank(corrine, jonis)\nCatalyse(phil, corrine)\nCatalyse(phil, jonis)\nSkank(phil, corrine)\nSkank(phil, roth)\nOvarian(jonis)\nResole(roth, corrine)\nResole(roth, jonis)\nFirsthand(roth)\nCatalyse(roth, corrine)\nCatalyse(roth, jonis)\nforall x (Catalyse(x, corrine) -> Resole(x, jonis))\nforall x (Resole(x, corrine) -> Resole(x, roth))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, corrine) and Resole(x, roth) -> Catalyse(corrine, phil))\nforall x (Skank(x, phil) and Resole(phil, jonis) -> Rococo(jonis))\nforall x (Myelinic(x) and Catalyse(x, phil) -> Resole(x, corrine))\nforall x (Resole(x, corrine) and Catalyse(x, corrine) -> Skank(x, jonis))\n\nnot Resole(jonis, jonis)\n\nforall x (Catalyse(x, corrine) -> Resole(x, jonis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The quintus down the rosina. The quintus is momentary. The quintus is seasonable. The quintus is scottish. The quintus rhumba the therese. The quintus kink the therese. The joline rhumba the quintus. The joline rhumba the therese. The joline kink the quintus. The joline kink the rosina. The therese is scottish. The rosina down the quintus. The rosina down the therese. The rosina is visualized. The rosina rhumba the quintus. The rosina rhumba the therese. If something rhumba the quintus then it down the therese. If something down the quintus then it down the rosina. If something rhumba the quintus and it down the rosina then the quintus rhumba the joline. If something kink the joline and the joline down the therese then the therese is seasonable. If something is momentary and it rhumba the joline then it down the quintus. If something down the quintus and it rhumba the quintus then it kink the therese. The joline down the quintus.", "logic": "\nDown(quintus, rosina)\nMomentary(quintus)\nSeasonable(quintus)\nScottish(quintus)\nRhumba(quintus, therese)\nKink(quintus, therese)\nRhumba(joline, quintus)\nRhumba(joline, therese)\nKink(joline, quintus)\nKink(joline, rosina)\nScottish(therese)\nDown(rosina, quintus)\nDown(rosina, therese)\nVisualized(rosina)\nRhumba(rosina, quintus)\nRhumba(rosina, therese)\nforall x (Rhumba(x, quintus) -> Down(x, therese))\nforall x (Down(x, quintus) -> Down(x, rosina))\nforall x (Rhumba(x, quintus) and Down(x, rosina) -> Rhumba(quintus, joline))\nforall x (Kink(x, joline) and Down(joline, therese) -> Seasonable(therese))\nforall x (Momentary(x) and Rhumba(x, joline) -> Down(x, quintus))\nforall x (Down(x, quintus) and Rhumba(x, quintus) -> Kink(x, therese))\n\nDown(joline, quintus)\n\nforall x (Momentary(x) and Rhumba(x, joline) -> Down(x, quintus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The rudd resuspend the sherlocke. The rudd is sinewy. The rudd is settled. The rudd is hegelian. The rudd tread the tyrone. The rudd natter the tyrone. The sonia tread the rudd. The sonia tread the tyrone. The sonia natter the rudd. The sonia natter the sherlocke. The tyrone is hegelian. The sherlocke resuspend the rudd. The sherlocke resuspend the tyrone. The sherlocke is abatic. The sherlocke tread the rudd. The sherlocke tread the tyrone. If something tread the rudd then it resuspend the tyrone. If something resuspend the rudd then it resuspend the sherlocke. If something tread the rudd and it resuspend the sherlocke then the rudd tread the sonia. If something natter the sonia and the sonia resuspend the tyrone then the tyrone is settled. If something is sinewy and it tread the sonia then it resuspend the rudd. If something resuspend the rudd and it tread the rudd then it natter the tyrone. The sherlocke does not visit the rudd.", "logic": "\nResuspend(rudd, sherlocke)\nSinewy(rudd)\nSettled(rudd)\nHegelian(rudd)\nTread(rudd, tyrone)\nNatter(rudd, tyrone)\nTread(sonia, rudd)\nTread(sonia, tyrone)\nNatter(sonia, rudd)\nNatter(sonia, sherlocke)\nHegelian(tyrone)\nResuspend(sherlocke, rudd)\nResuspend(sherlocke, tyrone)\nAbatic(sherlocke)\nTread(sherlocke, rudd)\nTread(sherlocke, tyrone)\nforall x (Tread(x, rudd) -> Resuspend(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, rudd) -> Resuspend(x, sherlocke))\nforall x (Tread(x, rudd) and Resuspend(x, sherlocke) -> Tread(rudd, sonia))\nforall x (Natter(x, sonia) and Resuspend(sonia, tyrone) -> Settled(tyrone))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Tread(x, sonia) -> Resuspend(x, rudd))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, rudd) and Tread(x, rudd) -> Natter(x, tyrone))\n\nnot Natter(sherlocke, rudd)\n\nnot Natter(sherlocke, rudd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The minerva argufy the laural. The minerva is barbaric. The minerva is topmost. The minerva is correlated. The minerva gormandise the cherey. The minerva wring the cherey. The sherwynd gormandise the minerva. The sherwynd gormandise the cherey. The sherwynd wring the minerva. The sherwynd wring the laural. The cherey is correlated. The laural argufy the minerva. The laural argufy the cherey. The laural is cogitative. The laural gormandise the minerva. The laural gormandise the cherey. If something gormandise the minerva then it argufy the cherey. If something argufy the minerva then it argufy the laural. If something gormandise the minerva and it argufy the laural then the minerva gormandise the sherwynd. If something wring the sherwynd and the sherwynd argufy the cherey then the cherey is topmost. If something is barbaric and it gormandise the sherwynd then it argufy the minerva. If something argufy the minerva and it gormandise the minerva then it wring the cherey. The laural gormandise the sherwynd.", "logic": "\nArgufy(minerva, laural)\nBarbaric(minerva)\nTopmost(minerva)\nCorrelated(minerva)\nGormandise(minerva, cherey)\nWring(minerva, cherey)\nGormandise(sherwynd, minerva)\nGormandise(sherwynd, cherey)\nWring(sherwynd, minerva)\nWring(sherwynd, laural)\nCorrelated(cherey)\nArgufy(laural, minerva)\nArgufy(laural, cherey)\nCogitative(laural)\nGormandise(laural, minerva)\nGormandise(laural, cherey)\nforall x (Gormandise(x, minerva) -> Argufy(x, cherey))\nforall x (Argufy(x, minerva) -> Argufy(x, laural))\nforall x (Gormandise(x, minerva) and Argufy(x, laural) -> Gormandise(minerva, sherwynd))\nforall x (Wring(x, sherwynd) and Argufy(sherwynd, cherey) -> Topmost(cherey))\nforall x (Barbaric(x) and Gormandise(x, sherwynd) -> Argufy(x, minerva))\nforall x (Argufy(x, minerva) and Gormandise(x, minerva) -> Wring(x, cherey))\n\nGormandise(laural, sherwynd)\n\nGormandise(laural, sherwynd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The hari cant the sydelle. The hari is unsworn. The hari is monotypic. The hari is unimpeded. The hari coexist the hanny. The hari crisp the hanny. The eunice coexist the hari. The eunice coexist the hanny. The eunice crisp the hari. The eunice crisp the sydelle. The hanny is unimpeded. The sydelle cant the hari. The sydelle cant the hanny. The sydelle is potbellied. The sydelle coexist the hari. The sydelle coexist the hanny. If something coexist the hari then it cant the hanny. If something cant the hari then it cant the sydelle. If something coexist the hari and it cant the sydelle then the hari coexist the eunice. If something crisp the eunice and the eunice cant the hanny then the hanny is monotypic. If something is unsworn and it coexist the eunice then it cant the hari. If something cant the hari and it coexist the hari then it crisp the hanny. The eunice does not like the eunice.", "logic": "\nCant(hari, sydelle)\nUnsworn(hari)\nMonotypic(hari)\nUnimpeded(hari)\nCoexist(hari, hanny)\nCrisp(hari, hanny)\nCoexist(eunice, hari)\nCoexist(eunice, hanny)\nCrisp(eunice, hari)\nCrisp(eunice, sydelle)\nUnimpeded(hanny)\nCant(sydelle, hari)\nCant(sydelle, hanny)\nPotbellied(sydelle)\nCoexist(sydelle, hari)\nCoexist(sydelle, hanny)\nforall x (Coexist(x, hari) -> Cant(x, hanny))\nforall x (Cant(x, hari) -> Cant(x, sydelle))\nforall x (Coexist(x, hari) and Cant(x, sydelle) -> Coexist(hari, eunice))\nforall x (Crisp(x, eunice) and Cant(eunice, hanny) -> Monotypic(hanny))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) and Coexist(x, eunice) -> Cant(x, hari))\nforall x (Cant(x, hari) and Coexist(x, hari) -> Crisp(x, hanny))\n\nnot Coexist(eunice, eunice)\n\nnot Coexist(eunice, eunice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The selia palaver the miles. The selia is frisky. The selia is unlogical. The selia is starring. The selia charcoal the crawford. The selia stool the crawford. The noelyn charcoal the selia. The noelyn charcoal the crawford. The noelyn stool the selia. The noelyn stool the miles. The crawford is starring. The miles palaver the selia. The miles palaver the crawford. The miles is emphasized. The miles charcoal the selia. The miles charcoal the crawford. If something charcoal the selia then it palaver the crawford. If something palaver the selia then it palaver the miles. If something charcoal the selia and it palaver the miles then the selia charcoal the noelyn. If something stool the noelyn and the noelyn palaver the crawford then the crawford is unlogical. If something is frisky and it charcoal the noelyn then it palaver the selia. If something palaver the selia and it charcoal the selia then it stool the crawford. The crawford stool the miles.", "logic": "\nPalaver(selia, miles)\nFrisky(selia)\nUnlogical(selia)\nStarring(selia)\nCharcoal(selia, crawford)\nStool(selia, crawford)\nCharcoal(noelyn, selia)\nCharcoal(noelyn, crawford)\nStool(noelyn, selia)\nStool(noelyn, miles)\nStarring(crawford)\nPalaver(miles, selia)\nPalaver(miles, crawford)\nEmphasized(miles)\nCharcoal(miles, selia)\nCharcoal(miles, crawford)\nforall x (Charcoal(x, selia) -> Palaver(x, crawford))\nforall x (Palaver(x, selia) -> Palaver(x, miles))\nforall x (Charcoal(x, selia) and Palaver(x, miles) -> Charcoal(selia, noelyn))\nforall x (Stool(x, noelyn) and Palaver(noelyn, crawford) -> Unlogical(crawford))\nforall x (Frisky(x) and Charcoal(x, noelyn) -> Palaver(x, selia))\nforall x (Palaver(x, selia) and Charcoal(x, selia) -> Stool(x, crawford))\n\nStool(crawford, miles)\n\nStool(crawford, miles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The auguste ensky the moria. The moria purchase the auguste. The kellen ensky the auguste. If someone is sidearm then they like the auguste. If someone ensky the moria then the moria purchase the kellen. If someone is sidearm and they eat the kellen then they need the moria. If someone desex the moria and the moria ensky the auguste then the auguste ensky the kellen. If someone ensky the moria and the moria purchase the auguste then they are sidearm. If someone desex the auguste then they are tired. If someone desex the auguste then they need the moria. If someone ensky the auguste then the auguste desex the kellen. The auguste ensky the moria.", "logic": "\nEnsky(auguste, moria)\nPurchase(moria, auguste)\nEnsky(kellen, auguste)\nforall x (Sidearm(x) -> Desex(x, auguste))\nforall x (Ensky(x, moria) -> Purchase(moria, kellen))\nforall x (Sidearm(x) and Ensky(x, kellen) -> Purchase(x, moria))\nforall x (Desex(x, moria) and Ensky(moria, auguste) -> Ensky(auguste, kellen))\nforall x (Ensky(x, moria) and Purchase(moria, auguste) -> Sidearm(x))\nforall x (Desex(x, auguste) -> Tired(x))\nforall x (Desex(x, auguste) -> Purchase(x, moria))\nforall x (Ensky(x, auguste) -> Desex(auguste, kellen))\n\nEnsky(auguste, moria)\n\ntherefore Ensky(auguste, moria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The juliane bunk the winona. The winona sportscast the juliane. The jeanne bunk the juliane. If someone is discalced then they like the juliane. If someone bunk the winona then the winona sportscast the jeanne. If someone is discalced and they eat the jeanne then they need the winona. If someone kneel the winona and the winona bunk the juliane then the juliane bunk the jeanne. If someone bunk the winona and the winona sportscast the juliane then they are discalced. If someone kneel the juliane then they are cupric. If someone kneel the juliane then they need the winona. If someone bunk the juliane then the juliane kneel the jeanne. The juliane does not eat the winona.", "logic": "\nBunk(juliane, winona)\nSportscast(winona, juliane)\nBunk(jeanne, juliane)\nforall x (Discalced(x) -> Kneel(x, juliane))\nforall x (Bunk(x, winona) -> Sportscast(winona, jeanne))\nforall x (Discalced(x) and Bunk(x, jeanne) -> Sportscast(x, winona))\nforall x (Kneel(x, winona) and Bunk(winona, juliane) -> Bunk(juliane, jeanne))\nforall x (Bunk(x, winona) and Sportscast(winona, juliane) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Kneel(x, juliane) -> Cupric(x))\nforall x (Kneel(x, juliane) -> Sportscast(x, winona))\nforall x (Bunk(x, juliane) -> Kneel(juliane, jeanne))\n\nnot Bunk(juliane, winona)\n\ntherefore Bunk(juliane, winona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The thaine elope the karry. The karry install the thaine. The matthew elope the thaine. If someone is lethargic then they like the thaine. If someone elope the karry then the karry install the matthew. If someone is lethargic and they eat the matthew then they need the karry. If someone monopolise the karry and the karry elope the thaine then the thaine elope the matthew. If someone elope the karry and the karry install the thaine then they are lethargic. If someone monopolise the thaine then they are unwrapped. If someone monopolise the thaine then they need the karry. If someone elope the thaine then the thaine monopolise the matthew. The karry install the matthew.", "logic": "\nElope(thaine, karry)\nInstall(karry, thaine)\nElope(matthew, thaine)\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Monopolise(x, thaine))\nforall x (Elope(x, karry) -> Install(karry, matthew))\nforall x (Lethargic(x) and Elope(x, matthew) -> Install(x, karry))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, karry) and Elope(karry, thaine) -> Elope(thaine, matthew))\nforall x (Elope(x, karry) and Install(karry, thaine) -> Lethargic(x))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, thaine) -> Unwrapped(x))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, thaine) -> Install(x, karry))\nforall x (Elope(x, thaine) -> Monopolise(thaine, matthew))\n\nInstall(karry, matthew)\n\nElope(thaine, karry) and forall x (Elope(x, karry) -> Install(karry, matthew)) -> therefore Install(karry, matthew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The erda constrain the keeley. The keeley loft the erda. The nolan constrain the erda. If someone is unimodal then they like the erda. If someone constrain the keeley then the keeley loft the nolan. If someone is unimodal and they eat the nolan then they need the keeley. If someone numb the keeley and the keeley constrain the erda then the erda constrain the nolan. If someone constrain the keeley and the keeley loft the erda then they are unimodal. If someone numb the erda then they are tepid. If someone numb the erda then they need the keeley. If someone constrain the erda then the erda numb the nolan. The erda is not unimodal.", "logic": "\nConstrain(erda, keeley)\nLoft(keeley, erda)\nConstrain(nolan, erda)\nforall x (Unimodal(x) -> Numb(x, erda))\nforall x (Constrain(x, keeley) -> Loft(keeley, nolan))\nforall x (Unimodal(x) and Constrain(x, nolan) -> Loft(x, keeley))\nforall x (Numb(x, keeley) and Constrain(keeley, erda) -> Constrain(erda, nolan))\nforall x (Constrain(x, keeley) and Loft(keeley, erda) -> Unimodal(x))\nforall x (Numb(x, erda) -> Tepid(x))\nforall x (Numb(x, erda) -> Loft(x, keeley))\nforall x (Constrain(x, erda) -> Numb(erda, nolan))\n\nnot Unimodal(erda)\n\nConstrain(erda, keeley) and Loft(keeley, erda) and forall x (Constrain(x, keeley) and Loft(keeley, erda) -> Unimodal(x)) -> therefore Unimodal(erda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The hank deodorize the alena. The alena complete the hank. The douglis deodorize the hank. If someone is functional then they like the hank. If someone deodorize the alena then the alena complete the douglis. If someone is functional and they eat the douglis then they need the alena. If someone readmit the alena and the alena deodorize the hank then the hank deodorize the douglis. If someone deodorize the alena and the alena complete the hank then they are functional. If someone readmit the hank then they are stalemated. If someone readmit the hank then they need the alena. If someone deodorize the hank then the hank readmit the douglis. The hank readmit the hank.", "logic": "\nDeodorize(hank, alena)\nComplete(alena, hank)\nDeodorize(douglis, hank)\nforall x (Functional(x) -> Readmit(x, hank))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, alena) -> Complete(alena, douglis))\nforall x (Functional(x) and Deodorize(x, douglis) -> Complete(x, alena))\nforall x (Readmit(x, alena) and Deodorize(alena, hank) -> Deodorize(hank, douglis))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, alena) and Complete(alena, hank) -> Functional(x))\nforall x (Readmit(x, hank) -> Stalemated(x))\nforall x (Readmit(x, hank) -> Complete(x, alena))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, hank) -> Readmit(hank, douglis))\n\nReadmit(hank, hank)\n\nDeodorize(hank, alena) and Complete(alena, hank) and forall x (Deodorize(x, alena) and Complete(alena, hank) -> Functional(x)) -> therefore Functional(hank) Functional(hank) and forall x (Functional(x) -> Readmit(x, hank)) -> therefore Readmit(hank, hank)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The loleta emend the evania. The evania antiquate the loleta. The bertina emend the loleta. If someone is lxvi then they like the loleta. If someone emend the evania then the evania antiquate the bertina. If someone is lxvi and they eat the bertina then they need the evania. If someone ring the evania and the evania emend the loleta then the loleta emend the bertina. If someone emend the evania and the evania antiquate the loleta then they are lxvi. If someone ring the loleta then they are cleared. If someone ring the loleta then they need the evania. If someone emend the loleta then the loleta ring the bertina. The loleta does not like the loleta.", "logic": "\nEmend(loleta, evania)\nAntiquate(evania, loleta)\nEmend(bertina, loleta)\nforall x (Lxvi(x) -> Ring(x, loleta))\nforall x (Emend(x, evania) -> Antiquate(evania, bertina))\nforall x (Lxvi(x) and Emend(x, bertina) -> Antiquate(x, evania))\nforall x (Ring(x, evania) and Emend(evania, loleta) -> Emend(loleta, bertina))\nforall x (Emend(x, evania) and Antiquate(evania, loleta) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Ring(x, loleta) -> Cleared(x))\nforall x (Ring(x, loleta) -> Antiquate(x, evania))\nforall x (Emend(x, loleta) -> Ring(loleta, bertina))\n\nnot Ring(loleta, loleta)\n\nEmend(loleta, evania) and Antiquate(evania, loleta) and forall x (Emend(x, evania) and Antiquate(evania, loleta) -> Lxvi(x)) -> therefore Lxvi(loleta) Lxvi(loleta) and forall x (Lxvi(x) -> Ring(x, loleta)) -> therefore Ring(loleta, loleta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The janos prey the neille. The neille buttress the janos. The bryant prey the janos. If someone is cuspate then they like the janos. If someone prey the neille then the neille buttress the bryant. If someone is cuspate and they eat the bryant then they need the neille. If someone ginger the neille and the neille prey the janos then the janos prey the bryant. If someone prey the neille and the neille buttress the janos then they are cuspate. If someone ginger the janos then they are impotent. If someone ginger the janos then they need the neille. If someone prey the janos then the janos ginger the bryant. The janos buttress the neille.", "logic": "\nPrey(janos, neille)\nButtress(neille, janos)\nPrey(bryant, janos)\nforall x (Cuspate(x) -> Ginger(x, janos))\nforall x (Prey(x, neille) -> Buttress(neille, bryant))\nforall x (Cuspate(x) and Prey(x, bryant) -> Buttress(x, neille))\nforall x (Ginger(x, neille) and Prey(neille, janos) -> Prey(janos, bryant))\nforall x (Prey(x, neille) and Buttress(neille, janos) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Ginger(x, janos) -> Impotent(x))\nforall x (Ginger(x, janos) -> Buttress(x, neille))\nforall x (Prey(x, janos) -> Ginger(janos, bryant))\n\nButtress(janos, neille)\n\nPrey(janos, neille) and Buttress(neille, janos) and forall x (Prey(x, neille) and Buttress(neille, janos) -> Cuspate(x)) -> therefore Cuspate(janos) Cuspate(janos) and forall x (Cuspate(x) -> Ginger(x, janos)) -> therefore Ginger(janos, janos) Ginger(janos, janos) and forall x (Ginger(x, janos) -> Buttress(x, neille)) -> therefore Buttress(janos, neille)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The chicky permit the suellen. The suellen fell the chicky. The haven permit the chicky. If someone is unshoed then they like the chicky. If someone permit the suellen then the suellen fell the haven. If someone is unshoed and they eat the haven then they need the suellen. If someone roast the suellen and the suellen permit the chicky then the chicky permit the haven. If someone permit the suellen and the suellen fell the chicky then they are unshoed. If someone roast the chicky then they are classical. If someone roast the chicky then they need the suellen. If someone permit the chicky then the chicky roast the haven. The chicky is not classical.", "logic": "\nPermit(chicky, suellen)\nFell(suellen, chicky)\nPermit(haven, chicky)\nforall x (Unshoed(x) -> Roast(x, chicky))\nforall x (Permit(x, suellen) -> Fell(suellen, haven))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) and Permit(x, haven) -> Fell(x, suellen))\nforall x (Roast(x, suellen) and Permit(suellen, chicky) -> Permit(chicky, haven))\nforall x (Permit(x, suellen) and Fell(suellen, chicky) -> Unshoed(x))\nforall x (Roast(x, chicky) -> Classical(x))\nforall x (Roast(x, chicky) -> Fell(x, suellen))\nforall x (Permit(x, chicky) -> Roast(chicky, haven))\n\nnot Classical(chicky)\n\nPermit(chicky, suellen) and Fell(suellen, chicky) and forall x (Permit(x, suellen) and Fell(suellen, chicky) -> Unshoed(x)) -> therefore Unshoed(chicky) Unshoed(chicky) and forall x (Unshoed(x) -> Roast(x, chicky)) -> therefore Roast(chicky, chicky) Roast(chicky, chicky) and forall x (Roast(x, chicky) -> Classical(x)) -> therefore Classical(chicky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The gwenn view the katrinka. The katrinka overdose the gwenn. The irvine view the gwenn. If someone is meddling then they like the gwenn. If someone view the katrinka then the katrinka overdose the irvine. If someone is meddling and they eat the irvine then they need the katrinka. If someone finish the katrinka and the katrinka view the gwenn then the gwenn view the irvine. If someone view the katrinka and the katrinka overdose the gwenn then they are meddling. If someone finish the gwenn then they are aeonian. If someone finish the gwenn then they need the katrinka. If someone view the gwenn then the gwenn finish the irvine. The irvine is not meddling.", "logic": "\nView(gwenn, katrinka)\nOverdose(katrinka, gwenn)\nView(irvine, gwenn)\nforall x (Meddling(x) -> Finish(x, gwenn))\nforall x (View(x, katrinka) -> Overdose(katrinka, irvine))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and View(x, irvine) -> Overdose(x, katrinka))\nforall x (Finish(x, katrinka) and View(katrinka, gwenn) -> View(gwenn, irvine))\nforall x (View(x, katrinka) and Overdose(katrinka, gwenn) -> Meddling(x))\nforall x (Finish(x, gwenn) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Finish(x, gwenn) -> Overdose(x, katrinka))\nforall x (View(x, gwenn) -> Finish(gwenn, irvine))\n\nnot Meddling(irvine)\n\nforall x (View(x, katrinka) and Overdose(katrinka, gwenn) -> Meddling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The bamby execrate the asia. The asia anatomise the bamby. The jock execrate the bamby. If someone is exothermic then they like the bamby. If someone execrate the asia then the asia anatomise the jock. If someone is exothermic and they eat the jock then they need the asia. If someone reply the asia and the asia execrate the bamby then the bamby execrate the jock. If someone execrate the asia and the asia anatomise the bamby then they are exothermic. If someone reply the bamby then they are unalert. If someone reply the bamby then they need the asia. If someone execrate the bamby then the bamby reply the jock. The jock is unalert.", "logic": "\nExecrate(bamby, asia)\nAnatomise(asia, bamby)\nExecrate(jock, bamby)\nforall x (Exothermic(x) -> Reply(x, bamby))\nforall x (Execrate(x, asia) -> Anatomise(asia, jock))\nforall x (Exothermic(x) and Execrate(x, jock) -> Anatomise(x, asia))\nforall x (Reply(x, asia) and Execrate(asia, bamby) -> Execrate(bamby, jock))\nforall x (Execrate(x, asia) and Anatomise(asia, bamby) -> Exothermic(x))\nforall x (Reply(x, bamby) -> Unalert(x))\nforall x (Reply(x, bamby) -> Anatomise(x, asia))\nforall x (Execrate(x, bamby) -> Reply(bamby, jock))\n\nUnalert(jock)\n\nforall x (Reply(x, bamby) -> Unalert(x)) <- forall x (Exothermic(x) -> Reply(x, bamby)) <- forall x (Execrate(x, asia) and Anatomise(asia, bamby) -> Exothermic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The conchita chasse the jeniece. The jeniece reprove the conchita. The wynne chasse the conchita. If someone is beetle then they like the conchita. If someone chasse the jeniece then the jeniece reprove the wynne. If someone is beetle and they eat the wynne then they need the jeniece. If someone doze the jeniece and the jeniece chasse the conchita then the conchita chasse the wynne. If someone chasse the jeniece and the jeniece reprove the conchita then they are beetle. If someone doze the conchita then they are anodal. If someone doze the conchita then they need the jeniece. If someone chasse the conchita then the conchita doze the wynne. The jeniece is not beetle.", "logic": "\nChasse(conchita, jeniece)\nReprove(jeniece, conchita)\nChasse(wynne, conchita)\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Doze(x, conchita))\nforall x (Chasse(x, jeniece) -> Reprove(jeniece, wynne))\nforall x (Beetle(x) and Chasse(x, wynne) -> Reprove(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Doze(x, jeniece) and Chasse(jeniece, conchita) -> Chasse(conchita, wynne))\nforall x (Chasse(x, jeniece) and Reprove(jeniece, conchita) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Doze(x, conchita) -> Anodal(x))\nforall x (Doze(x, conchita) -> Reprove(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Chasse(x, conchita) -> Doze(conchita, wynne))\n\nnot Beetle(jeniece)\n\nforall x (Chasse(x, jeniece) and Reprove(jeniece, conchita) -> Beetle(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The andreana esterify the laurice. The laurice effloresce the andreana. The leonid esterify the andreana. If someone is unweary then they like the andreana. If someone esterify the laurice then the laurice effloresce the leonid. If someone is unweary and they eat the leonid then they need the laurice. If someone criticise the laurice and the laurice esterify the andreana then the andreana esterify the leonid. If someone esterify the laurice and the laurice effloresce the andreana then they are unweary. If someone criticise the andreana then they are hobnailed. If someone criticise the andreana then they need the laurice. If someone esterify the andreana then the andreana criticise the leonid. The laurice effloresce the laurice.", "logic": "\nEsterify(andreana, laurice)\nEffloresce(laurice, andreana)\nEsterify(leonid, andreana)\nforall x (Unweary(x) -> Criticise(x, andreana))\nforall x (Esterify(x, laurice) -> Effloresce(laurice, leonid))\nforall x (Unweary(x) and Esterify(x, leonid) -> Effloresce(x, laurice))\nforall x (Criticise(x, laurice) and Esterify(laurice, andreana) -> Esterify(andreana, leonid))\nforall x (Esterify(x, laurice) and Effloresce(laurice, andreana) -> Unweary(x))\nforall x (Criticise(x, andreana) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Criticise(x, andreana) -> Effloresce(x, laurice))\nforall x (Esterify(x, andreana) -> Criticise(andreana, leonid))\n\nEffloresce(laurice, laurice)\n\nforall x (Criticise(x, andreana) -> Effloresce(x, laurice)) <- forall x (Unweary(x) -> Criticise(x, andreana)) <- forall x (Esterify(x, laurice) and Effloresce(laurice, andreana) -> Unweary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The jaquelin salve the eadith. The eadith accrue the jaquelin. The ned salve the jaquelin. If someone is tragicomic then they like the jaquelin. If someone salve the eadith then the eadith accrue the ned. If someone is tragicomic and they eat the ned then they need the eadith. If someone mortice the eadith and the eadith salve the jaquelin then the jaquelin salve the ned. If someone salve the eadith and the eadith accrue the jaquelin then they are tragicomic. If someone mortice the jaquelin then they are astatic. If someone mortice the jaquelin then they need the eadith. If someone salve the jaquelin then the jaquelin mortice the ned. The eadith does not eat the ned.", "logic": "\nSalve(jaquelin, eadith)\nAccrue(eadith, jaquelin)\nSalve(ned, jaquelin)\nforall x (Tragicomic(x) -> Mortice(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Salve(x, eadith) -> Accrue(eadith, ned))\nforall x (Tragicomic(x) and Salve(x, ned) -> Accrue(x, eadith))\nforall x (Mortice(x, eadith) and Salve(eadith, jaquelin) -> Salve(jaquelin, ned))\nforall x (Salve(x, eadith) and Accrue(eadith, jaquelin) -> Tragicomic(x))\nforall x (Mortice(x, jaquelin) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Mortice(x, jaquelin) -> Accrue(x, eadith))\nforall x (Salve(x, jaquelin) -> Mortice(jaquelin, ned))\n\nnot Salve(eadith, ned)\n\nnot Salve(eadith, ned) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The edythe bide the kath. The kath retrace the edythe. The merla bide the edythe. If someone is ninefold then they like the edythe. If someone bide the kath then the kath retrace the merla. If someone is ninefold and they eat the merla then they need the kath. If someone resent the kath and the kath bide the edythe then the edythe bide the merla. If someone bide the kath and the kath retrace the edythe then they are ninefold. If someone resent the edythe then they are uncertain. If someone resent the edythe then they need the kath. If someone bide the edythe then the edythe resent the merla. The merla resent the merla.", "logic": "\nBide(edythe, kath)\nRetrace(kath, edythe)\nBide(merla, edythe)\nforall x (Ninefold(x) -> Resent(x, edythe))\nforall x (Bide(x, kath) -> Retrace(kath, merla))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Bide(x, merla) -> Retrace(x, kath))\nforall x (Resent(x, kath) and Bide(kath, edythe) -> Bide(edythe, merla))\nforall x (Bide(x, kath) and Retrace(kath, edythe) -> Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Resent(x, edythe) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Resent(x, edythe) -> Retrace(x, kath))\nforall x (Bide(x, edythe) -> Resent(edythe, merla))\n\nResent(merla, merla)\n\nResent(merla, merla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The devonna speckle the hollie. The hollie swage the devonna. The rubi speckle the devonna. If someone is crimson then they like the devonna. If someone speckle the hollie then the hollie swage the rubi. If someone is crimson and they eat the rubi then they need the hollie. If someone cohere the hollie and the hollie speckle the devonna then the devonna speckle the rubi. If someone speckle the hollie and the hollie swage the devonna then they are crimson. If someone cohere the devonna then they are philippine. If someone cohere the devonna then they need the hollie. If someone speckle the devonna then the devonna cohere the rubi. The hollie does not like the hollie.", "logic": "\nSpeckle(devonna, hollie)\nSwage(hollie, devonna)\nSpeckle(rubi, devonna)\nforall x (Crimson(x) -> Cohere(x, devonna))\nforall x (Speckle(x, hollie) -> Swage(hollie, rubi))\nforall x (Crimson(x) and Speckle(x, rubi) -> Swage(x, hollie))\nforall x (Cohere(x, hollie) and Speckle(hollie, devonna) -> Speckle(devonna, rubi))\nforall x (Speckle(x, hollie) and Swage(hollie, devonna) -> Crimson(x))\nforall x (Cohere(x, devonna) -> Philippine(x))\nforall x (Cohere(x, devonna) -> Swage(x, hollie))\nforall x (Speckle(x, devonna) -> Cohere(devonna, rubi))\n\nnot Cohere(hollie, hollie)\n\nnot Cohere(hollie, hollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The pietra flounce the eugen. The eugen buckram the pietra. The haleigh flounce the pietra. If someone is geodetic then they like the pietra. If someone flounce the eugen then the eugen buckram the haleigh. If someone is geodetic and they eat the haleigh then they need the eugen. If someone pelt the eugen and the eugen flounce the pietra then the pietra flounce the haleigh. If someone flounce the eugen and the eugen buckram the pietra then they are geodetic. If someone pelt the pietra then they are uncharged. If someone pelt the pietra then they need the eugen. If someone flounce the pietra then the pietra pelt the haleigh. The pietra is blue.", "logic": "\nFlounce(pietra, eugen)\nBuckram(eugen, pietra)\nFlounce(haleigh, pietra)\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> Pelt(x, pietra))\nforall x (Flounce(x, eugen) -> Buckram(eugen, haleigh))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) and Flounce(x, haleigh) -> Buckram(x, eugen))\nforall x (Pelt(x, eugen) and Flounce(eugen, pietra) -> Flounce(pietra, haleigh))\nforall x (Flounce(x, eugen) and Buckram(eugen, pietra) -> Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Pelt(x, pietra) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Pelt(x, pietra) -> Buckram(x, eugen))\nforall x (Flounce(x, pietra) -> Pelt(pietra, haleigh))\n\nBlue(pietra)\n\nBlue(pietra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "Rochelle is not anaphasic. Rochelle is minuscule. Meriel is shocking. Meriel is not adulterate. Meriel is fortunate. Meriel is unmarked. Meriel is not minuscule. Davis is shocking. Davis is anaphasic. Davis is estrogenic. Davis is not fortunate. Marleen is unmarked. If something is adulterate and minuscule then it is fortunate. If Davis is not minuscule then Davis is shocking. If something is minuscule then it is adulterate. If Davis is unmarked and Davis is not shocking then Davis is not estrogenic. All estrogenic, fortunate things are anaphasic. All shocking, fortunate things are anaphasic. All fortunate things are not estrogenic. If something is anaphasic and adulterate then it is not estrogenic. Davis is shocking.", "logic": "\nnot Anaphasic(rochelle)\nMinuscule(rochelle)\nShocking(meriel)\nnot Adulterate(meriel)\nFortunate(meriel)\nUnmarked(meriel)\nnot Minuscule(meriel)\nShocking(davis)\nAnaphasic(davis)\nEstrogenic(davis)\nnot Fortunate(davis)\nUnmarked(marleen)\nforall x (Adulterate(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nnot Minuscule(davis) -> Shocking(davis)\nforall x (Minuscule(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nUnmarked(davis) and not Shocking(davis) -> not Estrogenic(davis)\nforall x (Estrogenic(x) and Fortunate(x) -> Anaphasic(x))\nforall x (Shocking(x) and Fortunate(x) -> Anaphasic(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> not Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Adulterate(x) -> not Estrogenic(x))\n\nShocking(davis)\n\ntherefore Shocking(davis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Crista is not romansh. Crista is dolorous. Morgana is calced. Morgana is not downward. Morgana is troublous. Morgana is industrial. Morgana is not dolorous. Rosalyn is calced. Rosalyn is romansh. Rosalyn is viable. Rosalyn is not troublous. Len is industrial. If something is downward and dolorous then it is troublous. If Rosalyn is not dolorous then Rosalyn is calced. If something is dolorous then it is downward. If Rosalyn is industrial and Rosalyn is not calced then Rosalyn is not viable. All viable, troublous things are romansh. All calced, troublous things are romansh. All troublous things are not viable. If something is romansh and downward then it is not viable. Rosalyn is not calced.", "logic": "\nnot Romansh(crista)\nDolorous(crista)\nCalced(morgana)\nnot Downward(morgana)\nTroublous(morgana)\nIndustrial(morgana)\nnot Dolorous(morgana)\nCalced(rosalyn)\nRomansh(rosalyn)\nViable(rosalyn)\nnot Troublous(rosalyn)\nIndustrial(len)\nforall x (Downward(x) and Dolorous(x) -> Troublous(x))\nnot Dolorous(rosalyn) -> Calced(rosalyn)\nforall x (Dolorous(x) -> Downward(x))\nIndustrial(rosalyn) and not Calced(rosalyn) -> not Viable(rosalyn)\nforall x (Viable(x) and Troublous(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Calced(x) and Troublous(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> not Viable(x))\nforall x (Romansh(x) and Downward(x) -> not Viable(x))\n\nnot Calced(rosalyn)\n\ntherefore Calced(rosalyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Talbot is not unstylish. Talbot is filled. Allene is unangry. Allene is not actual. Allene is biconvex. Allene is costumed. Allene is not filled. Kristina is unangry. Kristina is unstylish. Kristina is nubile. Kristina is not biconvex. Erinn is costumed. If something is actual and filled then it is biconvex. If Kristina is not filled then Kristina is unangry. If something is filled then it is actual. If Kristina is costumed and Kristina is not unangry then Kristina is not nubile. All nubile, biconvex things are unstylish. All unangry, biconvex things are unstylish. All biconvex things are not nubile. If something is unstylish and actual then it is not nubile. Allene is unstylish.", "logic": "\nnot Unstylish(talbot)\nFilled(talbot)\nUnangry(allene)\nnot Actual(allene)\nBiconvex(allene)\nCostumed(allene)\nnot Filled(allene)\nUnangry(kristina)\nUnstylish(kristina)\nNubile(kristina)\nnot Biconvex(kristina)\nCostumed(erinn)\nforall x (Actual(x) and Filled(x) -> Biconvex(x))\nnot Filled(kristina) -> Unangry(kristina)\nforall x (Filled(x) -> Actual(x))\nCostumed(kristina) and not Unangry(kristina) -> not Nubile(kristina)\nforall x (Nubile(x) and Biconvex(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Unangry(x) and Biconvex(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> not Nubile(x))\nforall x (Unstylish(x) and Actual(x) -> not Nubile(x))\n\nUnstylish(allene)\n\nUnangry(allene) and Biconvex(allene) and forall x (Unangry(x) and Biconvex(x) -> Unstylish(x)) -> therefore Unstylish(allene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Rhianon is not supernal. Rhianon is crescendo. Jaymee is rumpled. Jaymee is not meteoric. Jaymee is euphoric. Jaymee is rental. Jaymee is not crescendo. Halimeda is rumpled. Halimeda is supernal. Halimeda is august. Halimeda is not euphoric. Torin is rental. If something is meteoric and crescendo then it is euphoric. If Halimeda is not crescendo then Halimeda is rumpled. If something is crescendo then it is meteoric. If Halimeda is rental and Halimeda is not rumpled then Halimeda is not august. All august, euphoric things are supernal. All rumpled, euphoric things are supernal. All euphoric things are not august. If something is supernal and meteoric then it is not august. Rhianon is not meteoric.", "logic": "\nnot Supernal(rhianon)\nCrescendo(rhianon)\nRumpled(jaymee)\nnot Meteoric(jaymee)\nEuphoric(jaymee)\nRental(jaymee)\nnot Crescendo(jaymee)\nRumpled(halimeda)\nSupernal(halimeda)\nAugust(halimeda)\nnot Euphoric(halimeda)\nRental(torin)\nforall x (Meteoric(x) and Crescendo(x) -> Euphoric(x))\nnot Crescendo(halimeda) -> Rumpled(halimeda)\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Meteoric(x))\nRental(halimeda) and not Rumpled(halimeda) -> not August(halimeda)\nforall x (August(x) and Euphoric(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Rumpled(x) and Euphoric(x) -> Supernal(x))\nforall x (Euphoric(x) -> not August(x))\nforall x (Supernal(x) and Meteoric(x) -> not August(x))\n\nnot Meteoric(rhianon)\n\nCrescendo(rhianon) and forall x (Crescendo(x) -> Meteoric(x)) -> therefore Meteoric(rhianon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Prudi is not unwitting. Prudi is costless. Mauricio is unsorted. Mauricio is not socratic. Mauricio is bolshy. Mauricio is abducting. Mauricio is not costless. Stacee is unsorted. Stacee is unwitting. Stacee is ungreased. Stacee is not bolshy. Gusta is abducting. If something is socratic and costless then it is bolshy. If Stacee is not costless then Stacee is unsorted. If something is costless then it is socratic. If Stacee is abducting and Stacee is not unsorted then Stacee is not ungreased. All ungreased, bolshy things are unwitting. All unsorted, bolshy things are unwitting. All bolshy things are not ungreased. If something is unwitting and socratic then it is not ungreased. Prudi is bolshy.", "logic": "\nnot Unwitting(prudi)\nCostless(prudi)\nUnsorted(mauricio)\nnot Socratic(mauricio)\nBolshy(mauricio)\nAbducting(mauricio)\nnot Costless(mauricio)\nUnsorted(stacee)\nUnwitting(stacee)\nUngreased(stacee)\nnot Bolshy(stacee)\nAbducting(gusta)\nforall x (Socratic(x) and Costless(x) -> Bolshy(x))\nnot Costless(stacee) -> Unsorted(stacee)\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Socratic(x))\nAbducting(stacee) and not Unsorted(stacee) -> not Ungreased(stacee)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Bolshy(x) -> Unwitting(x))\nforall x (Unsorted(x) and Bolshy(x) -> Unwitting(x))\nforall x (Bolshy(x) -> not Ungreased(x))\nforall x (Unwitting(x) and Socratic(x) -> not Ungreased(x))\n\nBolshy(prudi)\n\nCostless(prudi) and forall x (Costless(x) -> Socratic(x)) -> therefore Socratic(prudi) Socratic(prudi) and Costless(prudi) and forall x (Socratic(x) and Costless(x) -> Bolshy(x)) -> therefore Bolshy(prudi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Jeana is not agonal. Jeana is cairned. Feodora is catenulate. Feodora is not fortissimo. Feodora is promotive. Feodora is dissolved. Feodora is not cairned. Rosmunda is catenulate. Rosmunda is agonal. Rosmunda is unerasable. Rosmunda is not promotive. Dolley is dissolved. If something is fortissimo and cairned then it is promotive. If Rosmunda is not cairned then Rosmunda is catenulate. If something is cairned then it is fortissimo. If Rosmunda is dissolved and Rosmunda is not catenulate then Rosmunda is not unerasable. All unerasable, promotive things are agonal. All catenulate, promotive things are agonal. All promotive things are not unerasable. If something is agonal and fortissimo then it is not unerasable. Jeana is not promotive.", "logic": "\nnot Agonal(jeana)\nCairned(jeana)\nCatenulate(feodora)\nnot Fortissimo(feodora)\nPromotive(feodora)\nDissolved(feodora)\nnot Cairned(feodora)\nCatenulate(rosmunda)\nAgonal(rosmunda)\nUnerasable(rosmunda)\nnot Promotive(rosmunda)\nDissolved(dolley)\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) and Cairned(x) -> Promotive(x))\nnot Cairned(rosmunda) -> Catenulate(rosmunda)\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Fortissimo(x))\nDissolved(rosmunda) and not Catenulate(rosmunda) -> not Unerasable(rosmunda)\nforall x (Unerasable(x) and Promotive(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Catenulate(x) and Promotive(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Promotive(x) -> not Unerasable(x))\nforall x (Agonal(x) and Fortissimo(x) -> not Unerasable(x))\n\nnot Promotive(jeana)\n\nCairned(jeana) and forall x (Cairned(x) -> Fortissimo(x)) -> therefore Fortissimo(jeana) Fortissimo(jeana) and Cairned(jeana) and forall x (Fortissimo(x) and Cairned(x) -> Promotive(x)) -> therefore Promotive(jeana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Corene is not malformed. Corene is colorful. Windham is apiarian. Windham is not chopfallen. Windham is heuristic. Windham is wrathful. Windham is not colorful. Ervin is apiarian. Ervin is malformed. Ervin is seditious. Ervin is not heuristic. Ferdie is wrathful. If something is chopfallen and colorful then it is heuristic. If Ervin is not colorful then Ervin is apiarian. If something is colorful then it is chopfallen. If Ervin is wrathful and Ervin is not apiarian then Ervin is not seditious. All seditious, heuristic things are malformed. All apiarian, heuristic things are malformed. All heuristic things are not seditious. If something is malformed and chopfallen then it is not seditious. Corene is not seditious.", "logic": "\nnot Malformed(corene)\nColorful(corene)\nApiarian(windham)\nnot Chopfallen(windham)\nHeuristic(windham)\nWrathful(windham)\nnot Colorful(windham)\nApiarian(ervin)\nMalformed(ervin)\nSeditious(ervin)\nnot Heuristic(ervin)\nWrathful(ferdie)\nforall x (Chopfallen(x) and Colorful(x) -> Heuristic(x))\nnot Colorful(ervin) -> Apiarian(ervin)\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Chopfallen(x))\nWrathful(ervin) and not Apiarian(ervin) -> not Seditious(ervin)\nforall x (Seditious(x) and Heuristic(x) -> Malformed(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) and Heuristic(x) -> Malformed(x))\nforall x (Heuristic(x) -> not Seditious(x))\nforall x (Malformed(x) and Chopfallen(x) -> not Seditious(x))\n\nnot Seditious(corene)\n\nColorful(corene) and forall x (Colorful(x) -> Chopfallen(x)) -> therefore Chopfallen(corene) Chopfallen(corene) and Colorful(corene) and forall x (Chopfallen(x) and Colorful(x) -> Heuristic(x)) -> therefore Heuristic(corene) Heuristic(corene) and forall x (Heuristic(x) -> not Seditious(x)) -> therefore not Seditious(corene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Doll is not consummate. Doll is monatomic. Orelee is statant. Orelee is not unmoving. Orelee is glassy. Orelee is needful. Orelee is not monatomic. Leone is statant. Leone is consummate. Leone is beery. Leone is not glassy. Audra is needful. If something is unmoving and monatomic then it is glassy. If Leone is not monatomic then Leone is statant. If something is monatomic then it is unmoving. If Leone is needful and Leone is not statant then Leone is not beery. All beery, glassy things are consummate. All statant, glassy things are consummate. All glassy things are not beery. If something is consummate and unmoving then it is not beery. Doll is beery.", "logic": "\nnot Consummate(doll)\nMonatomic(doll)\nStatant(orelee)\nnot Unmoving(orelee)\nGlassy(orelee)\nNeedful(orelee)\nnot Monatomic(orelee)\nStatant(leone)\nConsummate(leone)\nBeery(leone)\nnot Glassy(leone)\nNeedful(audra)\nforall x (Unmoving(x) and Monatomic(x) -> Glassy(x))\nnot Monatomic(leone) -> Statant(leone)\nforall x (Monatomic(x) -> Unmoving(x))\nNeedful(leone) and not Statant(leone) -> not Beery(leone)\nforall x (Beery(x) and Glassy(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Statant(x) and Glassy(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Glassy(x) -> not Beery(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) and Unmoving(x) -> not Beery(x))\n\nBeery(doll)\n\nMonatomic(doll) and forall x (Monatomic(x) -> Unmoving(x)) -> therefore Unmoving(doll) Unmoving(doll) and Monatomic(doll) and forall x (Unmoving(x) and Monatomic(x) -> Glassy(x)) -> therefore Glassy(doll) Glassy(doll) and forall x (Glassy(x) -> not Beery(x)) -> therefore not Beery(doll)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Silvano is not blended. Silvano is avowed. Tedda is falconine. Tedda is not portrayed. Tedda is alleged. Tedda is univocal. Tedda is not avowed. Jenine is falconine. Jenine is blended. Jenine is creaseless. Jenine is not alleged. Wilona is univocal. If something is portrayed and avowed then it is alleged. If Jenine is not avowed then Jenine is falconine. If something is avowed then it is portrayed. If Jenine is univocal and Jenine is not falconine then Jenine is not creaseless. All creaseless, alleged things are blended. All falconine, alleged things are blended. All alleged things are not creaseless. If something is blended and portrayed then it is not creaseless. Wilona is not blended.", "logic": "\nnot Blended(silvano)\nAvowed(silvano)\nFalconine(tedda)\nnot Portrayed(tedda)\nAlleged(tedda)\nUnivocal(tedda)\nnot Avowed(tedda)\nFalconine(jenine)\nBlended(jenine)\nCreaseless(jenine)\nnot Alleged(jenine)\nUnivocal(wilona)\nforall x (Portrayed(x) and Avowed(x) -> Alleged(x))\nnot Avowed(jenine) -> Falconine(jenine)\nforall x (Avowed(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nUnivocal(jenine) and not Falconine(jenine) -> not Creaseless(jenine)\nforall x (Creaseless(x) and Alleged(x) -> Blended(x))\nforall x (Falconine(x) and Alleged(x) -> Blended(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> not Creaseless(x))\nforall x (Blended(x) and Portrayed(x) -> not Creaseless(x))\n\nnot Blended(wilona)\n\nforall x (Creaseless(x) and Alleged(x) -> Blended(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Sanderson is not stoic. Sanderson is ottoman. Alisha is semiotical. Alisha is not slippy. Alisha is breathless. Alisha is besprent. Alisha is not ottoman. Bernardo is semiotical. Bernardo is stoic. Bernardo is pastel. Bernardo is not breathless. Melisa is besprent. If something is slippy and ottoman then it is breathless. If Bernardo is not ottoman then Bernardo is semiotical. If something is ottoman then it is slippy. If Bernardo is besprent and Bernardo is not semiotical then Bernardo is not pastel. All pastel, breathless things are stoic. All semiotical, breathless things are stoic. All breathless things are not pastel. If something is stoic and slippy then it is not pastel. Melisa is breathless.", "logic": "\nnot Stoic(sanderson)\nOttoman(sanderson)\nSemiotical(alisha)\nnot Slippy(alisha)\nBreathless(alisha)\nBesprent(alisha)\nnot Ottoman(alisha)\nSemiotical(bernardo)\nStoic(bernardo)\nPastel(bernardo)\nnot Breathless(bernardo)\nBesprent(melisa)\nforall x (Slippy(x) and Ottoman(x) -> Breathless(x))\nnot Ottoman(bernardo) -> Semiotical(bernardo)\nforall x (Ottoman(x) -> Slippy(x))\nBesprent(bernardo) and not Semiotical(bernardo) -> not Pastel(bernardo)\nforall x (Pastel(x) and Breathless(x) -> Stoic(x))\nforall x (Semiotical(x) and Breathless(x) -> Stoic(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) -> not Pastel(x))\nforall x (Stoic(x) and Slippy(x) -> not Pastel(x))\n\nBreathless(melisa)\n\nforall x (Slippy(x) and Ottoman(x) -> Breathless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Margalit is not snobbish. Margalit is affective. Gershon is quiescent. Gershon is not expansible. Gershon is spikelike. Gershon is unratified. Gershon is not affective. Noelyn is quiescent. Noelyn is snobbish. Noelyn is exergonic. Noelyn is not spikelike. Corny is unratified. If something is expansible and affective then it is spikelike. If Noelyn is not affective then Noelyn is quiescent. If something is affective then it is expansible. If Noelyn is unratified and Noelyn is not quiescent then Noelyn is not exergonic. All exergonic, spikelike things are snobbish. All quiescent, spikelike things are snobbish. All spikelike things are not exergonic. If something is snobbish and expansible then it is not exergonic. Corny is not expansible.", "logic": "\nnot Snobbish(margalit)\nAffective(margalit)\nQuiescent(gershon)\nnot Expansible(gershon)\nSpikelike(gershon)\nUnratified(gershon)\nnot Affective(gershon)\nQuiescent(noelyn)\nSnobbish(noelyn)\nExergonic(noelyn)\nnot Spikelike(noelyn)\nUnratified(corny)\nforall x (Expansible(x) and Affective(x) -> Spikelike(x))\nnot Affective(noelyn) -> Quiescent(noelyn)\nforall x (Affective(x) -> Expansible(x))\nUnratified(noelyn) and not Quiescent(noelyn) -> not Exergonic(noelyn)\nforall x (Exergonic(x) and Spikelike(x) -> Snobbish(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) and Spikelike(x) -> Snobbish(x))\nforall x (Spikelike(x) -> not Exergonic(x))\nforall x (Snobbish(x) and Expansible(x) -> not Exergonic(x))\n\nnot Expansible(corny)\n\nforall x (Affective(x) -> Expansible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Kenton is not uneventful. Kenton is shingly. Delcine is homologous. Delcine is not slatternly. Delcine is realised. Delcine is dizzy. Delcine is not shingly. Mairead is homologous. Mairead is uneventful. Mairead is neurologic. Mairead is not realised. Tomasine is dizzy. If something is slatternly and shingly then it is realised. If Mairead is not shingly then Mairead is homologous. If something is shingly then it is slatternly. If Mairead is dizzy and Mairead is not homologous then Mairead is not neurologic. All neurologic, realised things are uneventful. All homologous, realised things are uneventful. All realised things are not neurologic. If something is uneventful and slatternly then it is not neurologic. Mairead is slatternly.", "logic": "\nnot Uneventful(kenton)\nShingly(kenton)\nHomologous(delcine)\nnot Slatternly(delcine)\nRealised(delcine)\nDizzy(delcine)\nnot Shingly(delcine)\nHomologous(mairead)\nUneventful(mairead)\nNeurologic(mairead)\nnot Realised(mairead)\nDizzy(tomasine)\nforall x (Slatternly(x) and Shingly(x) -> Realised(x))\nnot Shingly(mairead) -> Homologous(mairead)\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Slatternly(x))\nDizzy(mairead) and not Homologous(mairead) -> not Neurologic(mairead)\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Realised(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Homologous(x) and Realised(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Realised(x) -> not Neurologic(x))\nforall x (Uneventful(x) and Slatternly(x) -> not Neurologic(x))\n\nSlatternly(mairead)\n\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Slatternly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Kare is not asymptotic. Kare is martial. Esme is valiant. Esme is not mucous. Esme is retrograde. Esme is aggregate. Esme is not martial. Vernen is valiant. Vernen is asymptotic. Vernen is jaundiced. Vernen is not retrograde. Nadean is aggregate. If something is mucous and martial then it is retrograde. If Vernen is not martial then Vernen is valiant. If something is martial then it is mucous. If Vernen is aggregate and Vernen is not valiant then Vernen is not jaundiced. All jaundiced, retrograde things are asymptotic. All valiant, retrograde things are asymptotic. All retrograde things are not jaundiced. If something is asymptotic and mucous then it is not jaundiced. Kare is not aggregate.", "logic": "\nnot Asymptotic(kare)\nMartial(kare)\nValiant(esme)\nnot Mucous(esme)\nRetrograde(esme)\nAggregate(esme)\nnot Martial(esme)\nValiant(vernen)\nAsymptotic(vernen)\nJaundiced(vernen)\nnot Retrograde(vernen)\nAggregate(nadean)\nforall x (Mucous(x) and Martial(x) -> Retrograde(x))\nnot Martial(vernen) -> Valiant(vernen)\nforall x (Martial(x) -> Mucous(x))\nAggregate(vernen) and not Valiant(vernen) -> not Jaundiced(vernen)\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) and Retrograde(x) -> Asymptotic(x))\nforall x (Valiant(x) and Retrograde(x) -> Asymptotic(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) -> not Jaundiced(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) and Mucous(x) -> not Jaundiced(x))\n\nnot Aggregate(kare)\n\nnot Aggregate(kare) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Dario is not exceeding. Dario is straw. Lynne is microbial. Lynne is not bumptious. Lynne is apian. Lynne is unseeyn. Lynne is not straw. Dorella is microbial. Dorella is exceeding. Dorella is textual. Dorella is not apian. Oriana is unseeyn. If something is bumptious and straw then it is apian. If Dorella is not straw then Dorella is microbial. If something is straw then it is bumptious. If Dorella is unseeyn and Dorella is not microbial then Dorella is not textual. All textual, apian things are exceeding. All microbial, apian things are exceeding. All apian things are not textual. If something is exceeding and bumptious then it is not textual. Dorella is unseeyn.", "logic": "\nnot Exceeding(dario)\nStraw(dario)\nMicrobial(lynne)\nnot Bumptious(lynne)\nApian(lynne)\nUnseeyn(lynne)\nnot Straw(lynne)\nMicrobial(dorella)\nExceeding(dorella)\nTextual(dorella)\nnot Apian(dorella)\nUnseeyn(oriana)\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and Straw(x) -> Apian(x))\nnot Straw(dorella) -> Microbial(dorella)\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Bumptious(x))\nUnseeyn(dorella) and not Microbial(dorella) -> not Textual(dorella)\nforall x (Textual(x) and Apian(x) -> Exceeding(x))\nforall x (Microbial(x) and Apian(x) -> Exceeding(x))\nforall x (Apian(x) -> not Textual(x))\nforall x (Exceeding(x) and Bumptious(x) -> not Textual(x))\n\nUnseeyn(dorella)\n\nUnseeyn(dorella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Sophie is not ebracteate. Sophie is climatical. Aretha is isotropic. Aretha is not kyphotic. Aretha is untreated. Aretha is bolshevist. Aretha is not climatical. Harman is isotropic. Harman is ebracteate. Harman is oral. Harman is not untreated. Wally is bolshevist. If something is kyphotic and climatical then it is untreated. If Harman is not climatical then Harman is isotropic. If something is climatical then it is kyphotic. If Harman is bolshevist and Harman is not isotropic then Harman is not oral. All oral, untreated things are ebracteate. All isotropic, untreated things are ebracteate. All untreated things are not oral. If something is ebracteate and kyphotic then it is not oral. Wally is not isotropic.", "logic": "\nnot Ebracteate(sophie)\nClimatical(sophie)\nIsotropic(aretha)\nnot Kyphotic(aretha)\nUntreated(aretha)\nBolshevist(aretha)\nnot Climatical(aretha)\nIsotropic(harman)\nEbracteate(harman)\nOral(harman)\nnot Untreated(harman)\nBolshevist(wally)\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) and Climatical(x) -> Untreated(x))\nnot Climatical(harman) -> Isotropic(harman)\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> Kyphotic(x))\nBolshevist(harman) and not Isotropic(harman) -> not Oral(harman)\nforall x (Oral(x) and Untreated(x) -> Ebracteate(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Untreated(x) -> Ebracteate(x))\nforall x (Untreated(x) -> not Oral(x))\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) and Kyphotic(x) -> not Oral(x))\n\nnot Isotropic(wally)\n\nnot Isotropic(wally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Kassandra is not curled. Kassandra is baronial. Dulciana is tearaway. Dulciana is not ratty. Dulciana is unassured. Dulciana is scaled. Dulciana is not baronial. Mikhail is tearaway. Mikhail is curled. Mikhail is lamentable. Mikhail is not unassured. Johnny is scaled. If something is ratty and baronial then it is unassured. If Mikhail is not baronial then Mikhail is tearaway. If something is baronial then it is ratty. If Mikhail is scaled and Mikhail is not tearaway then Mikhail is not lamentable. All lamentable, unassured things are curled. All tearaway, unassured things are curled. All unassured things are not lamentable. If something is curled and ratty then it is not lamentable. Kassandra is tearaway.", "logic": "\nnot Curled(kassandra)\nBaronial(kassandra)\nTearaway(dulciana)\nnot Ratty(dulciana)\nUnassured(dulciana)\nScaled(dulciana)\nnot Baronial(dulciana)\nTearaway(mikhail)\nCurled(mikhail)\nLamentable(mikhail)\nnot Unassured(mikhail)\nScaled(johnny)\nforall x (Ratty(x) and Baronial(x) -> Unassured(x))\nnot Baronial(mikhail) -> Tearaway(mikhail)\nforall x (Baronial(x) -> Ratty(x))\nScaled(mikhail) and not Tearaway(mikhail) -> not Lamentable(mikhail)\nforall x (Lamentable(x) and Unassured(x) -> Curled(x))\nforall x (Tearaway(x) and Unassured(x) -> Curled(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> not Lamentable(x))\nforall x (Curled(x) and Ratty(x) -> not Lamentable(x))\n\nTearaway(kassandra)\n\nTearaway(kassandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Kacie is forensic. Kacie is unaffixed. Kacie is fruticose. Daria is silver. Daria is forensic. Daria is coeliac. Daria is unaffixed. Daria is embonpoint. Herman is lyric. Herman is forensic. Herman is coeliac. Herman is embonpoint. Young things are lyric. If something is lyric and forensic then it is silver. Cold, coeliac things are unaffixed. If something is embonpoint then it is unaffixed. Cold, forensic things are coeliac. If Kacie is fruticose then Kacie is embonpoint. Daria is silver.", "logic": "\nForensic(kacie)\nUnaffixed(kacie)\nFruticose(kacie)\nSilver(daria)\nForensic(daria)\nCoeliac(daria)\nUnaffixed(daria)\nEmbonpoint(daria)\nLyric(herman)\nForensic(herman)\nCoeliac(herman)\nEmbonpoint(herman)\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Lyric(x))\nforall x (Lyric(x) and Forensic(x) -> Silver(x))\nforall x (Silver(x) and Coeliac(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\nforall x (Silver(x) and Forensic(x) -> Coeliac(x))\nFruticose(kacie) -> Embonpoint(kacie)\n\nSilver(daria)\n\ntherefore Silver(daria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Minerva is fagged. Minerva is unvented. Minerva is recorded. Laetitia is pyogenic. Laetitia is fagged. Laetitia is namibian. Laetitia is unvented. Laetitia is softheaded. Kalie is judicable. Kalie is fagged. Kalie is namibian. Kalie is softheaded. Young things are judicable. If something is judicable and fagged then it is pyogenic. Cold, namibian things are unvented. If something is softheaded then it is unvented. Cold, fagged things are namibian. If Minerva is recorded then Minerva is softheaded. Laetitia is not pyogenic.", "logic": "\nFagged(minerva)\nUnvented(minerva)\nRecorded(minerva)\nPyogenic(laetitia)\nFagged(laetitia)\nNamibian(laetitia)\nUnvented(laetitia)\nSoftheaded(laetitia)\nJudicable(kalie)\nFagged(kalie)\nNamibian(kalie)\nSoftheaded(kalie)\nforall x (Softheaded(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Judicable(x) and Fagged(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and Namibian(x) -> Unvented(x))\nforall x (Softheaded(x) -> Unvented(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and Fagged(x) -> Namibian(x))\nRecorded(minerva) -> Softheaded(minerva)\n\nnot Pyogenic(laetitia)\n\ntherefore Pyogenic(laetitia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Barton is prime. Barton is uncharged. Barton is hagridden. Andreas is sculptural. Andreas is prime. Andreas is northbound. Andreas is uncharged. Andreas is lively. Hestia is nonionized. Hestia is prime. Hestia is northbound. Hestia is lively. Young things are nonionized. If something is nonionized and prime then it is sculptural. Cold, northbound things are uncharged. If something is lively then it is uncharged. Cold, prime things are northbound. If Barton is hagridden then Barton is lively. Hestia is sculptural.", "logic": "\nPrime(barton)\nUncharged(barton)\nHagridden(barton)\nSculptural(andreas)\nPrime(andreas)\nNorthbound(andreas)\nUncharged(andreas)\nLively(andreas)\nNonionized(hestia)\nPrime(hestia)\nNorthbound(hestia)\nLively(hestia)\nforall x (Lively(x) -> Nonionized(x))\nforall x (Nonionized(x) and Prime(x) -> Sculptural(x))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) and Northbound(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Lively(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) and Prime(x) -> Northbound(x))\nHagridden(barton) -> Lively(barton)\n\nSculptural(hestia)\n\nNonionized(hestia) and Prime(hestia) and forall x (Nonionized(x) and Prime(x) -> Sculptural(x)) -> therefore Sculptural(hestia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Alexine is anatropous. Alexine is manichee. Alexine is matched. Dyanna is mammoth. Dyanna is anatropous. Dyanna is unshielded. Dyanna is manichee. Dyanna is singular. Jory is xxvi. Jory is anatropous. Jory is unshielded. Jory is singular. Young things are xxvi. If something is xxvi and anatropous then it is mammoth. Cold, unshielded things are manichee. If something is singular then it is manichee. Cold, anatropous things are unshielded. If Alexine is matched then Alexine is singular. Alexine is not singular.", "logic": "\nAnatropous(alexine)\nManichee(alexine)\nMatched(alexine)\nMammoth(dyanna)\nAnatropous(dyanna)\nUnshielded(dyanna)\nManichee(dyanna)\nSingular(dyanna)\nXxvi(jory)\nAnatropous(jory)\nUnshielded(jory)\nSingular(jory)\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Xxvi(x))\nforall x (Xxvi(x) and Anatropous(x) -> Mammoth(x))\nforall x (Mammoth(x) and Unshielded(x) -> Manichee(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Manichee(x))\nforall x (Mammoth(x) and Anatropous(x) -> Unshielded(x))\nMatched(alexine) -> Singular(alexine)\n\nnot Singular(alexine)\n\nMatched(alexine) and Matched(alexine) -> Singular(alexine) -> therefore Singular(alexine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Erminia is utilizable. Erminia is refractory. Erminia is ulcerous. Herbert is haphazard. Herbert is utilizable. Herbert is donnish. Herbert is refractory. Herbert is sound. Vania is petalous. Vania is utilizable. Vania is donnish. Vania is sound. Young things are petalous. If something is petalous and utilizable then it is haphazard. Cold, donnish things are refractory. If something is sound then it is refractory. Cold, utilizable things are donnish. If Erminia is ulcerous then Erminia is sound. Erminia is petalous.", "logic": "\nUtilizable(erminia)\nRefractory(erminia)\nUlcerous(erminia)\nHaphazard(herbert)\nUtilizable(herbert)\nDonnish(herbert)\nRefractory(herbert)\nSound(herbert)\nPetalous(vania)\nUtilizable(vania)\nDonnish(vania)\nSound(vania)\nforall x (Sound(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Petalous(x) and Utilizable(x) -> Haphazard(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) and Donnish(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Sound(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) and Utilizable(x) -> Donnish(x))\nUlcerous(erminia) -> Sound(erminia)\n\nPetalous(erminia)\n\nUlcerous(erminia) and Ulcerous(erminia) -> Sound(erminia) -> therefore Sound(erminia) Sound(erminia) and forall x (Sound(x) -> Petalous(x)) -> therefore Petalous(erminia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Whitby is fourfold. Whitby is mucosal. Whitby is emblematic. Johnette is multiplied. Johnette is fourfold. Johnette is standing. Johnette is mucosal. Johnette is bared. Powell is antiseptic. Powell is fourfold. Powell is standing. Powell is bared. Young things are antiseptic. If something is antiseptic and fourfold then it is multiplied. Cold, standing things are mucosal. If something is bared then it is mucosal. Cold, fourfold things are standing. If Whitby is emblematic then Whitby is bared. Whitby is not antiseptic.", "logic": "\nFourfold(whitby)\nMucosal(whitby)\nEmblematic(whitby)\nMultiplied(johnette)\nFourfold(johnette)\nStanding(johnette)\nMucosal(johnette)\nBared(johnette)\nAntiseptic(powell)\nFourfold(powell)\nStanding(powell)\nBared(powell)\nforall x (Bared(x) -> Antiseptic(x))\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) and Fourfold(x) -> Multiplied(x))\nforall x (Multiplied(x) and Standing(x) -> Mucosal(x))\nforall x (Bared(x) -> Mucosal(x))\nforall x (Multiplied(x) and Fourfold(x) -> Standing(x))\nEmblematic(whitby) -> Bared(whitby)\n\nnot Antiseptic(whitby)\n\nEmblematic(whitby) and Emblematic(whitby) -> Bared(whitby) -> therefore Bared(whitby) Bared(whitby) and forall x (Bared(x) -> Antiseptic(x)) -> therefore Antiseptic(whitby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Bertram is aortal. Bertram is unparallel. Bertram is carolean. Merle is sovereign. Merle is aortal. Merle is lucid. Merle is unparallel. Merle is seismic. Tommi is sissy. Tommi is aortal. Tommi is lucid. Tommi is seismic. Young things are sissy. If something is sissy and aortal then it is sovereign. Cold, lucid things are unparallel. If something is seismic then it is unparallel. Cold, aortal things are lucid. If Bertram is carolean then Bertram is seismic. Bertram is sovereign.", "logic": "\nAortal(bertram)\nUnparallel(bertram)\nCarolean(bertram)\nSovereign(merle)\nAortal(merle)\nLucid(merle)\nUnparallel(merle)\nSeismic(merle)\nSissy(tommi)\nAortal(tommi)\nLucid(tommi)\nSeismic(tommi)\nforall x (Seismic(x) -> Sissy(x))\nforall x (Sissy(x) and Aortal(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Lucid(x) -> Unparallel(x))\nforall x (Seismic(x) -> Unparallel(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Aortal(x) -> Lucid(x))\nCarolean(bertram) -> Seismic(bertram)\n\nSovereign(bertram)\n\nCarolean(bertram) and Carolean(bertram) -> Seismic(bertram) -> therefore Seismic(bertram) Seismic(bertram) and forall x (Seismic(x) -> Sissy(x)) -> therefore Sissy(bertram) Sissy(bertram) and Aortal(bertram) and forall x (Sissy(x) and Aortal(x) -> Sovereign(x)) -> therefore Sovereign(bertram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Percy is placeable. Percy is burnished. Percy is stovepiped. Ketty is platonic. Ketty is placeable. Ketty is emphatic. Ketty is burnished. Ketty is unsociable. Spiro is shagged. Spiro is placeable. Spiro is emphatic. Spiro is unsociable. Young things are shagged. If something is shagged and placeable then it is platonic. Cold, emphatic things are burnished. If something is unsociable then it is burnished. Cold, placeable things are emphatic. If Percy is stovepiped then Percy is unsociable. Percy is not platonic.", "logic": "\nPlaceable(percy)\nBurnished(percy)\nStovepiped(percy)\nPlatonic(ketty)\nPlaceable(ketty)\nEmphatic(ketty)\nBurnished(ketty)\nUnsociable(ketty)\nShagged(spiro)\nPlaceable(spiro)\nEmphatic(spiro)\nUnsociable(spiro)\nforall x (Unsociable(x) -> Shagged(x))\nforall x (Shagged(x) and Placeable(x) -> Platonic(x))\nforall x (Platonic(x) and Emphatic(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Platonic(x) and Placeable(x) -> Emphatic(x))\nStovepiped(percy) -> Unsociable(percy)\n\nnot Platonic(percy)\n\nStovepiped(percy) and Stovepiped(percy) -> Unsociable(percy) -> therefore Unsociable(percy) Unsociable(percy) and forall x (Unsociable(x) -> Shagged(x)) -> therefore Shagged(percy) Shagged(percy) and Placeable(percy) and forall x (Shagged(x) and Placeable(x) -> Platonic(x)) -> therefore Platonic(percy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Murielle is modified. Murielle is alveolar. Murielle is whiplike. Brenna is skeletal. Brenna is modified. Brenna is lawful. Brenna is alveolar. Brenna is flabby. Giles is uncurled. Giles is modified. Giles is lawful. Giles is flabby. Young things are uncurled. If something is uncurled and modified then it is skeletal. Cold, lawful things are alveolar. If something is flabby then it is alveolar. Cold, modified things are lawful. If Murielle is whiplike then Murielle is flabby. Giles is not whiplike.", "logic": "\nModified(murielle)\nAlveolar(murielle)\nWhiplike(murielle)\nSkeletal(brenna)\nModified(brenna)\nLawful(brenna)\nAlveolar(brenna)\nFlabby(brenna)\nUncurled(giles)\nModified(giles)\nLawful(giles)\nFlabby(giles)\nforall x (Flabby(x) -> Uncurled(x))\nforall x (Uncurled(x) and Modified(x) -> Skeletal(x))\nforall x (Skeletal(x) and Lawful(x) -> Alveolar(x))\nforall x (Flabby(x) -> Alveolar(x))\nforall x (Skeletal(x) and Modified(x) -> Lawful(x))\nWhiplike(murielle) -> Flabby(murielle)\n\nnot Whiplike(giles)\n\nnot Whiplike(giles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Jeanette is pycnotic. Jeanette is believable. Jeanette is unremarked. Marten is faineant. Marten is pycnotic. Marten is unitarian. Marten is believable. Marten is unimproved. Rachele is layered. Rachele is pycnotic. Rachele is unitarian. Rachele is unimproved. Young things are layered. If something is layered and pycnotic then it is faineant. Cold, unitarian things are believable. If something is unimproved then it is believable. Cold, pycnotic things are unitarian. If Jeanette is unremarked then Jeanette is unimproved. Marten is unremarked.", "logic": "\nPycnotic(jeanette)\nBelievable(jeanette)\nUnremarked(jeanette)\nFaineant(marten)\nPycnotic(marten)\nUnitarian(marten)\nBelievable(marten)\nUnimproved(marten)\nLayered(rachele)\nPycnotic(rachele)\nUnitarian(rachele)\nUnimproved(rachele)\nforall x (Unimproved(x) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Faineant(x))\nforall x (Faineant(x) and Unitarian(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Unimproved(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Faineant(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nUnremarked(jeanette) -> Unimproved(jeanette)\n\nUnremarked(marten)\n\nUnremarked(marten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Zia is not perineal. Zia is vulcanized. Liana is insectan. Liana is not perineal. Liana is not botched. Liana is vulcanized. Ardyth is vulcanized. Grete is scholastic. Grete is botched. Grete is vulcanized. Round things are plumbic. Nice things are plumbic. If something is insectan and not botched then it is plumbic. If Ardyth is perineal and Ardyth is vulcanized then Ardyth is bipedal. If something is plumbic then it is insectan. If something is insectan and botched then it is not bipedal. If something is bipedal and botched then it is not vulcanized. Furry things are vulcanized. Grete is scholastic.", "logic": "\nnot Perineal(zia)\nVulcanized(zia)\nInsectan(liana)\nnot Perineal(liana)\nnot Botched(liana)\nVulcanized(liana)\nVulcanized(ardyth)\nScholastic(grete)\nBotched(grete)\nVulcanized(grete)\nforall x (Vulcanized(x) -> Plumbic(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Plumbic(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) and not Botched(x) -> Plumbic(x))\nPerineal(ardyth) and Vulcanized(ardyth) -> Bipedal(ardyth)\nforall x (Plumbic(x) -> Insectan(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) and Botched(x) -> not Bipedal(x))\nforall x (Bipedal(x) and Botched(x) -> not Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\n\nScholastic(grete)\n\ntherefore Scholastic(grete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Ania is not satanic. Ania is stalemated. Latisha is monatomic. Latisha is not satanic. Latisha is not bryophytic. Latisha is stalemated. Jared is stalemated. Lory is unwelcome. Lory is bryophytic. Lory is stalemated. Round things are hoarse. Nice things are hoarse. If something is monatomic and not bryophytic then it is hoarse. If Jared is satanic and Jared is stalemated then Jared is couthy. If something is hoarse then it is monatomic. If something is monatomic and bryophytic then it is not couthy. If something is couthy and bryophytic then it is not stalemated. Furry things are stalemated. Latisha is not stalemated.", "logic": "\nnot Satanic(ania)\nStalemated(ania)\nMonatomic(latisha)\nnot Satanic(latisha)\nnot Bryophytic(latisha)\nStalemated(latisha)\nStalemated(jared)\nUnwelcome(lory)\nBryophytic(lory)\nStalemated(lory)\nforall x (Stalemated(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nforall x (Unwelcome(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and not Bryophytic(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nSatanic(jared) and Stalemated(jared) -> Couthy(jared)\nforall x (Hoarse(x) -> Monatomic(x))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Bryophytic(x) -> not Couthy(x))\nforall x (Couthy(x) and Bryophytic(x) -> not Stalemated(x))\nforall x (Hoarse(x) -> Stalemated(x))\n\nnot Stalemated(latisha)\n\ntherefore Stalemated(latisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Kary is not agitative. Kary is spanish. Ronda is stearic. Ronda is not agitative. Ronda is not boxlike. Ronda is spanish. Ruella is spanish. Janus is prima. Janus is boxlike. Janus is spanish. Round things are unlined. Nice things are unlined. If something is stearic and not boxlike then it is unlined. If Ruella is agitative and Ruella is spanish then Ruella is tractable. If something is unlined then it is stearic. If something is stearic and boxlike then it is not tractable. If something is tractable and boxlike then it is not spanish. Furry things are spanish. Janus is unlined.", "logic": "\nnot Agitative(kary)\nSpanish(kary)\nStearic(ronda)\nnot Agitative(ronda)\nnot Boxlike(ronda)\nSpanish(ronda)\nSpanish(ruella)\nPrima(janus)\nBoxlike(janus)\nSpanish(janus)\nforall x (Spanish(x) -> Unlined(x))\nforall x (Prima(x) -> Unlined(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) and not Boxlike(x) -> Unlined(x))\nAgitative(ruella) and Spanish(ruella) -> Tractable(ruella)\nforall x (Unlined(x) -> Stearic(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) and Boxlike(x) -> not Tractable(x))\nforall x (Tractable(x) and Boxlike(x) -> not Spanish(x))\nforall x (Unlined(x) -> Spanish(x))\n\nUnlined(janus)\n\nSpanish(janus) and forall x (Spanish(x) -> Unlined(x)) -> therefore Unlined(janus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Sashenka is not saltish. Sashenka is unsigned. Martha is internal. Martha is not saltish. Martha is not sudden. Martha is unsigned. Jennee is unsigned. Jacinda is transeunt. Jacinda is sudden. Jacinda is unsigned. Round things are dismantled. Nice things are dismantled. If something is internal and not sudden then it is dismantled. If Jennee is saltish and Jennee is unsigned then Jennee is libelous. If something is dismantled then it is internal. If something is internal and sudden then it is not libelous. If something is libelous and sudden then it is not unsigned. Furry things are unsigned. Jennee is not dismantled.", "logic": "\nnot Saltish(sashenka)\nUnsigned(sashenka)\nInternal(martha)\nnot Saltish(martha)\nnot Sudden(martha)\nUnsigned(martha)\nUnsigned(jennee)\nTranseunt(jacinda)\nSudden(jacinda)\nUnsigned(jacinda)\nforall x (Unsigned(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nforall x (Transeunt(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) and not Sudden(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nSaltish(jennee) and Unsigned(jennee) -> Libelous(jennee)\nforall x (Dismantled(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) and Sudden(x) -> not Libelous(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) and Sudden(x) -> not Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Dismantled(x) -> Unsigned(x))\n\nnot Dismantled(jennee)\n\nUnsigned(jennee) and forall x (Unsigned(x) -> Dismantled(x)) -> therefore Dismantled(jennee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Cyndy is not unbending. Cyndy is utility. Alvera is braky. Alvera is not unbending. Alvera is not cottony. Alvera is utility. Rodney is utility. Trenna is celestial. Trenna is cottony. Trenna is utility. Round things are dissonant. Nice things are dissonant. If something is braky and not cottony then it is dissonant. If Rodney is unbending and Rodney is utility then Rodney is pantheist. If something is dissonant then it is braky. If something is braky and cottony then it is not pantheist. If something is pantheist and cottony then it is not utility. Furry things are utility. Cyndy is braky.", "logic": "\nnot Unbending(cyndy)\nUtility(cyndy)\nBraky(alvera)\nnot Unbending(alvera)\nnot Cottony(alvera)\nUtility(alvera)\nUtility(rodney)\nCelestial(trenna)\nCottony(trenna)\nUtility(trenna)\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nforall x (Celestial(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and not Cottony(x) -> Dissonant(x))\nUnbending(rodney) and Utility(rodney) -> Pantheist(rodney)\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Braky(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and Cottony(x) -> not Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) and Cottony(x) -> not Utility(x))\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Utility(x))\n\nBraky(cyndy)\n\nUtility(cyndy) and forall x (Utility(x) -> Dissonant(x)) -> therefore Dissonant(cyndy) Dissonant(cyndy) and forall x (Dissonant(x) -> Braky(x)) -> therefore Braky(cyndy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Berte is not walleyed. Berte is expanded. Moishe is unmannered. Moishe is not walleyed. Moishe is not resurgent. Moishe is expanded. Judie is expanded. Saraann is ribless. Saraann is resurgent. Saraann is expanded. Round things are smelly. Nice things are smelly. If something is unmannered and not resurgent then it is smelly. If Judie is walleyed and Judie is expanded then Judie is efficient. If something is smelly then it is unmannered. If something is unmannered and resurgent then it is not efficient. If something is efficient and resurgent then it is not expanded. Furry things are expanded. Saraann is not unmannered.", "logic": "\nnot Walleyed(berte)\nExpanded(berte)\nUnmannered(moishe)\nnot Walleyed(moishe)\nnot Resurgent(moishe)\nExpanded(moishe)\nExpanded(judie)\nRibless(saraann)\nResurgent(saraann)\nExpanded(saraann)\nforall x (Expanded(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Unmannered(x) and not Resurgent(x) -> Smelly(x))\nWalleyed(judie) and Expanded(judie) -> Efficient(judie)\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Unmannered(x))\nforall x (Unmannered(x) and Resurgent(x) -> not Efficient(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Resurgent(x) -> not Expanded(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Expanded(x))\n\nnot Unmannered(saraann)\n\nExpanded(saraann) and forall x (Expanded(x) -> Smelly(x)) -> therefore Smelly(saraann) Smelly(saraann) and forall x (Smelly(x) -> Unmannered(x)) -> therefore Unmannered(saraann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Marilu is not headless. Marilu is watery. Marcus is vicarious. Marcus is not headless. Marcus is not ebracteate. Marcus is watery. Cordy is watery. Archon is nonplussed. Archon is ebracteate. Archon is watery. Round things are noetic. Nice things are noetic. If something is vicarious and not ebracteate then it is noetic. If Cordy is headless and Cordy is watery then Cordy is undraped. If something is noetic then it is vicarious. If something is vicarious and ebracteate then it is not undraped. If something is undraped and ebracteate then it is not watery. Furry things are watery. Archon is not undraped.", "logic": "\nnot Headless(marilu)\nWatery(marilu)\nVicarious(marcus)\nnot Headless(marcus)\nnot Ebracteate(marcus)\nWatery(marcus)\nWatery(cordy)\nNonplussed(archon)\nEbracteate(archon)\nWatery(archon)\nforall x (Watery(x) -> Noetic(x))\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Noetic(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) and not Ebracteate(x) -> Noetic(x))\nHeadless(cordy) and Watery(cordy) -> Undraped(cordy)\nforall x (Noetic(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) and Ebracteate(x) -> not Undraped(x))\nforall x (Undraped(x) and Ebracteate(x) -> not Watery(x))\nforall x (Noetic(x) -> Watery(x))\n\nnot Undraped(archon)\n\nWatery(archon) and forall x (Watery(x) -> Noetic(x)) -> therefore Noetic(archon) Noetic(archon) and forall x (Noetic(x) -> Vicarious(x)) -> therefore Vicarious(archon) Vicarious(archon) and Ebracteate(archon) and forall x (Vicarious(x) and Ebracteate(x) -> not Undraped(x)) -> therefore not Undraped(archon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Alister is not foliolate. Alister is crossbred. Gonzalo is jumbo. Gonzalo is not foliolate. Gonzalo is not separated. Gonzalo is crossbred. Mathew is crossbred. Fancie is authorised. Fancie is separated. Fancie is crossbred. Round things are spurned. Nice things are spurned. If something is jumbo and not separated then it is spurned. If Mathew is foliolate and Mathew is crossbred then Mathew is rifled. If something is spurned then it is jumbo. If something is jumbo and separated then it is not rifled. If something is rifled and separated then it is not crossbred. Furry things are crossbred. Fancie is rifled.", "logic": "\nnot Foliolate(alister)\nCrossbred(alister)\nJumbo(gonzalo)\nnot Foliolate(gonzalo)\nnot Separated(gonzalo)\nCrossbred(gonzalo)\nCrossbred(mathew)\nAuthorised(fancie)\nSeparated(fancie)\nCrossbred(fancie)\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> Spurned(x))\nforall x (Authorised(x) -> Spurned(x))\nforall x (Jumbo(x) and not Separated(x) -> Spurned(x))\nFoliolate(mathew) and Crossbred(mathew) -> Rifled(mathew)\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Jumbo(x))\nforall x (Jumbo(x) and Separated(x) -> not Rifled(x))\nforall x (Rifled(x) and Separated(x) -> not Crossbred(x))\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Crossbred(x))\n\nRifled(fancie)\n\nCrossbred(fancie) and forall x (Crossbred(x) -> Spurned(x)) -> therefore Spurned(fancie) Spurned(fancie) and forall x (Spurned(x) -> Jumbo(x)) -> therefore Jumbo(fancie) Jumbo(fancie) and Separated(fancie) and forall x (Jumbo(x) and Separated(x) -> not Rifled(x)) -> therefore not Rifled(fancie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Coletta is not bovine. Coletta is uncombed. Emmet is analeptic. Emmet is not bovine. Emmet is not unshod. Emmet is uncombed. Vassily is uncombed. Garvin is expensive. Garvin is unshod. Garvin is uncombed. Round things are superfine. Nice things are superfine. If something is analeptic and not unshod then it is superfine. If Vassily is bovine and Vassily is uncombed then Vassily is unpaved. If something is superfine then it is analeptic. If something is analeptic and unshod then it is not unpaved. If something is unpaved and unshod then it is not uncombed. Furry things are uncombed. Vassily is not unpaved.", "logic": "\nnot Bovine(coletta)\nUncombed(coletta)\nAnaleptic(emmet)\nnot Bovine(emmet)\nnot Unshod(emmet)\nUncombed(emmet)\nUncombed(vassily)\nExpensive(garvin)\nUnshod(garvin)\nUncombed(garvin)\nforall x (Uncombed(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Expensive(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) and not Unshod(x) -> Superfine(x))\nBovine(vassily) and Uncombed(vassily) -> Unpaved(vassily)\nforall x (Superfine(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) and Unshod(x) -> not Unpaved(x))\nforall x (Unpaved(x) and Unshod(x) -> not Uncombed(x))\nforall x (Superfine(x) -> Uncombed(x))\n\nnot Unpaved(vassily)\n\nBovine(vassily) and Uncombed(vassily) -> Unpaved(vassily) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Kerri is not faceted. Kerri is frightened. Roobbie is perfect. Roobbie is not faceted. Roobbie is not irish. Roobbie is frightened. Warren is frightened. Tomasina is stemmatic. Tomasina is irish. Tomasina is frightened. Round things are singular. Nice things are singular. If something is perfect and not irish then it is singular. If Warren is faceted and Warren is frightened then Warren is tricksy. If something is singular then it is perfect. If something is perfect and irish then it is not tricksy. If something is tricksy and irish then it is not frightened. Furry things are frightened. Warren is irish.", "logic": "\nnot Faceted(kerri)\nFrightened(kerri)\nPerfect(roobbie)\nnot Faceted(roobbie)\nnot Irish(roobbie)\nFrightened(roobbie)\nFrightened(warren)\nStemmatic(tomasina)\nIrish(tomasina)\nFrightened(tomasina)\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Stemmatic(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) and not Irish(x) -> Singular(x))\nFaceted(warren) and Frightened(warren) -> Tricksy(warren)\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Perfect(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) and Irish(x) -> not Tricksy(x))\nforall x (Tricksy(x) and Irish(x) -> not Frightened(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Frightened(x))\n\nIrish(warren)\n\nIrish(warren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Shir is not chainlike. Shir is pleural. Mairead is hick. Mairead is not chainlike. Mairead is not cubistic. Mairead is pleural. Zelig is pleural. Coriss is repellent. Coriss is cubistic. Coriss is pleural. Round things are unproved. Nice things are unproved. If something is hick and not cubistic then it is unproved. If Zelig is chainlike and Zelig is pleural then Zelig is prostatic. If something is unproved then it is hick. If something is hick and cubistic then it is not prostatic. If something is prostatic and cubistic then it is not pleural. Furry things are pleural. Coriss is not chainlike.", "logic": "\nnot Chainlike(shir)\nPleural(shir)\nHick(mairead)\nnot Chainlike(mairead)\nnot Cubistic(mairead)\nPleural(mairead)\nPleural(zelig)\nRepellent(coriss)\nCubistic(coriss)\nPleural(coriss)\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> Unproved(x))\nforall x (Repellent(x) -> Unproved(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) and not Cubistic(x) -> Unproved(x))\nChainlike(zelig) and Pleural(zelig) -> Prostatic(zelig)\nforall x (Unproved(x) -> Hick(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) and Cubistic(x) -> not Prostatic(x))\nforall x (Prostatic(x) and Cubistic(x) -> not Pleural(x))\nforall x (Unproved(x) -> Pleural(x))\n\nnot Chainlike(coriss)\n\nnot Chainlike(coriss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Sergeant is not tame. Sergeant is frayed. Amadeus is hazardous. Amadeus is not tame. Amadeus is not danceable. Amadeus is frayed. Dietrich is frayed. Roxi is clammy. Roxi is danceable. Roxi is frayed. Round things are odourless. Nice things are odourless. If something is hazardous and not danceable then it is odourless. If Dietrich is tame and Dietrich is frayed then Dietrich is stenotic. If something is odourless then it is hazardous. If something is hazardous and danceable then it is not stenotic. If something is stenotic and danceable then it is not frayed. Furry things are frayed. Dietrich is tame.", "logic": "\nnot Tame(sergeant)\nFrayed(sergeant)\nHazardous(amadeus)\nnot Tame(amadeus)\nnot Danceable(amadeus)\nFrayed(amadeus)\nFrayed(dietrich)\nClammy(roxi)\nDanceable(roxi)\nFrayed(roxi)\nforall x (Frayed(x) -> Odourless(x))\nforall x (Clammy(x) -> Odourless(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) and not Danceable(x) -> Odourless(x))\nTame(dietrich) and Frayed(dietrich) -> Stenotic(dietrich)\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Hazardous(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) and Danceable(x) -> not Stenotic(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and Danceable(x) -> not Frayed(x))\nforall x (Odourless(x) -> Frayed(x))\n\nTame(dietrich)\n\nTame(dietrich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Annalyse is not neapolitan. Annalyse is nighted. Eddy is ancient. Eddy is not neapolitan. Eddy is not platelike. Eddy is nighted. Flower is nighted. Amber is zairean. Amber is platelike. Amber is nighted. Round things are spiked. Nice things are spiked. If something is ancient and not platelike then it is spiked. If Flower is neapolitan and Flower is nighted then Flower is cubist. If something is spiked then it is ancient. If something is ancient and platelike then it is not cubist. If something is cubist and platelike then it is not nighted. Furry things are nighted. Annalyse is not cubist.", "logic": "\nnot Neapolitan(annalyse)\nNighted(annalyse)\nAncient(eddy)\nnot Neapolitan(eddy)\nnot Platelike(eddy)\nNighted(eddy)\nNighted(flower)\nZairean(amber)\nPlatelike(amber)\nNighted(amber)\nforall x (Nighted(x) -> Spiked(x))\nforall x (Zairean(x) -> Spiked(x))\nforall x (Ancient(x) and not Platelike(x) -> Spiked(x))\nNeapolitan(flower) and Nighted(flower) -> Cubist(flower)\nforall x (Spiked(x) -> Ancient(x))\nforall x (Ancient(x) and Platelike(x) -> not Cubist(x))\nforall x (Cubist(x) and Platelike(x) -> not Nighted(x))\nforall x (Spiked(x) -> Nighted(x))\n\nnot Cubist(annalyse)\n\nnot Cubist(annalyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Caesar is not argentic. Caesar is northmost. Hank is untraveled. Hank is not argentic. Hank is not middle. Hank is northmost. Amberly is northmost. Margurite is unalarming. Margurite is middle. Margurite is northmost. Round things are gone. Nice things are gone. If something is untraveled and not middle then it is gone. If Amberly is argentic and Amberly is northmost then Amberly is moist. If something is gone then it is untraveled. If something is untraveled and middle then it is not moist. If something is moist and middle then it is not northmost. Furry things are northmost. Amberly is unalarming.", "logic": "\nnot Argentic(caesar)\nNorthmost(caesar)\nUntraveled(hank)\nnot Argentic(hank)\nnot Middle(hank)\nNorthmost(hank)\nNorthmost(amberly)\nUnalarming(margurite)\nMiddle(margurite)\nNorthmost(margurite)\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Gone(x))\nforall x (Unalarming(x) -> Gone(x))\nforall x (Untraveled(x) and not Middle(x) -> Gone(x))\nArgentic(amberly) and Northmost(amberly) -> Moist(amberly)\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Untraveled(x))\nforall x (Untraveled(x) and Middle(x) -> not Moist(x))\nforall x (Moist(x) and Middle(x) -> not Northmost(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Northmost(x))\n\nUnalarming(amberly)\n\nUnalarming(amberly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Rusty is not glutted. Rusty is hipless. Stig is studious. Stig is not glutted. Stig is not nitric. Stig is hipless. Myrtle is hipless. Maye is chequered. Maye is nitric. Maye is hipless. Round things are burnable. Nice things are burnable. If something is studious and not nitric then it is burnable. If Myrtle is glutted and Myrtle is hipless then Myrtle is paranasal. If something is burnable then it is studious. If something is studious and nitric then it is not paranasal. If something is paranasal and nitric then it is not hipless. Furry things are hipless. Stig is not paranasal.", "logic": "\nnot Glutted(rusty)\nHipless(rusty)\nStudious(stig)\nnot Glutted(stig)\nnot Nitric(stig)\nHipless(stig)\nHipless(myrtle)\nChequered(maye)\nNitric(maye)\nHipless(maye)\nforall x (Hipless(x) -> Burnable(x))\nforall x (Chequered(x) -> Burnable(x))\nforall x (Studious(x) and not Nitric(x) -> Burnable(x))\nGlutted(myrtle) and Hipless(myrtle) -> Paranasal(myrtle)\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Studious(x))\nforall x (Studious(x) and Nitric(x) -> not Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Paranasal(x) and Nitric(x) -> not Hipless(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Hipless(x))\n\nnot Paranasal(stig)\n\nnot Paranasal(stig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Leigh is not duple. Leigh is uniform. Linnea is rivalrous. Linnea is not duple. Linnea is not shod. Linnea is uniform. Keely is uniform. Reba is flagging. Reba is shod. Reba is uniform. Round things are extinct. Nice things are extinct. If something is rivalrous and not shod then it is extinct. If Keely is duple and Keely is uniform then Keely is flaxen. If something is extinct then it is rivalrous. If something is rivalrous and shod then it is not flaxen. If something is flaxen and shod then it is not uniform. Furry things are uniform. Leigh is flagging.", "logic": "\nnot Duple(leigh)\nUniform(leigh)\nRivalrous(linnea)\nnot Duple(linnea)\nnot Shod(linnea)\nUniform(linnea)\nUniform(keely)\nFlagging(reba)\nShod(reba)\nUniform(reba)\nforall x (Uniform(x) -> Extinct(x))\nforall x (Flagging(x) -> Extinct(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) and not Shod(x) -> Extinct(x))\nDuple(keely) and Uniform(keely) -> Flaxen(keely)\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) and Shod(x) -> not Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) and Shod(x) -> not Uniform(x))\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Uniform(x))\n\nFlagging(leigh)\n\nFlagging(leigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Renel is blessed. Renel is spendable. Myles is blessed. Myles is despondent. Myles is not unrewarded. Myles is convinced. Meriel is not rateable. Ann is blessed. Ann is unrewarded. Ann is nonpolar. Ann is convinced. Ann is spendable. If someone is spendable then they are rateable. If Renel is spendable and Renel is rateable then Renel is convinced. If Renel is despondent then Renel is convinced. All convinced, blessed people are nonpolar. If Renel is convinced then Renel is not unrewarded. All blessed people are spendable. Furry people are spendable. If Ann is blessed and Ann is not convinced then Ann is nonpolar. Renel is spendable.", "logic": "\nBlessed(renel)\nSpendable(renel)\nBlessed(myles)\nDespondent(myles)\nnot Unrewarded(myles)\nConvinced(myles)\nnot Rateable(meriel)\nBlessed(ann)\nUnrewarded(ann)\nNonpolar(ann)\nConvinced(ann)\nSpendable(ann)\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Rateable(x))\nSpendable(renel) and Rateable(renel) -> Convinced(renel)\nDespondent(renel) -> Convinced(renel)\nforall x (Convinced(x) and Blessed(x) -> Nonpolar(x))\nConvinced(renel) -> not Unrewarded(renel)\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Spendable(x))\nBlessed(ann) and not Convinced(ann) -> Nonpolar(ann)\n\nSpendable(renel)\n\ntherefore Spendable(renel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Leyla is horrendous. Leyla is extropic. Milicent is horrendous. Milicent is fagged. Milicent is not wispy. Milicent is plowed. Nonie is not deferent. Caryn is horrendous. Caryn is wispy. Caryn is spirant. Caryn is plowed. Caryn is extropic. If someone is extropic then they are deferent. If Leyla is extropic and Leyla is deferent then Leyla is plowed. If Leyla is fagged then Leyla is plowed. All plowed, horrendous people are spirant. If Leyla is plowed then Leyla is not wispy. All horrendous people are extropic. Furry people are extropic. If Caryn is horrendous and Caryn is not plowed then Caryn is spirant. Leyla is not horrendous.", "logic": "\nHorrendous(leyla)\nExtropic(leyla)\nHorrendous(milicent)\nFagged(milicent)\nnot Wispy(milicent)\nPlowed(milicent)\nnot Deferent(nonie)\nHorrendous(caryn)\nWispy(caryn)\nSpirant(caryn)\nPlowed(caryn)\nExtropic(caryn)\nforall x (Extropic(x) -> Deferent(x))\nExtropic(leyla) and Deferent(leyla) -> Plowed(leyla)\nFagged(leyla) -> Plowed(leyla)\nforall x (Plowed(x) and Horrendous(x) -> Spirant(x))\nPlowed(leyla) -> not Wispy(leyla)\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Extropic(x))\nforall x (Wispy(x) -> Extropic(x))\nHorrendous(caryn) and not Plowed(caryn) -> Spirant(caryn)\n\nnot Horrendous(leyla)\n\ntherefore Horrendous(leyla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Elbertina is eutherian. Elbertina is destroyed. Filip is eutherian. Filip is hooved. Filip is not meshugga. Filip is brickle. Cornelia is not postwar. Dalila is eutherian. Dalila is meshugga. Dalila is tarsal. Dalila is brickle. Dalila is destroyed. If someone is destroyed then they are postwar. If Elbertina is destroyed and Elbertina is postwar then Elbertina is brickle. If Elbertina is hooved then Elbertina is brickle. All brickle, eutherian people are tarsal. If Elbertina is brickle then Elbertina is not meshugga. All eutherian people are destroyed. Furry people are destroyed. If Dalila is eutherian and Dalila is not brickle then Dalila is tarsal. Filip is tarsal.", "logic": "\nEutherian(elbertina)\nDestroyed(elbertina)\nEutherian(filip)\nHooved(filip)\nnot Meshugga(filip)\nBrickle(filip)\nnot Postwar(cornelia)\nEutherian(dalila)\nMeshugga(dalila)\nTarsal(dalila)\nBrickle(dalila)\nDestroyed(dalila)\nforall x (Destroyed(x) -> Postwar(x))\nDestroyed(elbertina) and Postwar(elbertina) -> Brickle(elbertina)\nHooved(elbertina) -> Brickle(elbertina)\nforall x (Brickle(x) and Eutherian(x) -> Tarsal(x))\nBrickle(elbertina) -> not Meshugga(elbertina)\nforall x (Eutherian(x) -> Destroyed(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) -> Destroyed(x))\nEutherian(dalila) and not Brickle(dalila) -> Tarsal(dalila)\n\nTarsal(filip)\n\nBrickle(filip) and Eutherian(filip) and forall x (Brickle(x) and Eutherian(x) -> Tarsal(x)) -> therefore Tarsal(filip)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Julianne is juiceless. Julianne is footling. Selby is juiceless. Selby is cultivated. Selby is not unbroken. Selby is coastwise. Karena is not inclined. Abdel is juiceless. Abdel is unbroken. Abdel is inner. Abdel is coastwise. Abdel is footling. If someone is footling then they are inclined. If Julianne is footling and Julianne is inclined then Julianne is coastwise. If Julianne is cultivated then Julianne is coastwise. All coastwise, juiceless people are inner. If Julianne is coastwise then Julianne is not unbroken. All juiceless people are footling. Furry people are footling. If Abdel is juiceless and Abdel is not coastwise then Abdel is inner. Selby is not footling.", "logic": "\nJuiceless(julianne)\nFootling(julianne)\nJuiceless(selby)\nCultivated(selby)\nnot Unbroken(selby)\nCoastwise(selby)\nnot Inclined(karena)\nJuiceless(abdel)\nUnbroken(abdel)\nInner(abdel)\nCoastwise(abdel)\nFootling(abdel)\nforall x (Footling(x) -> Inclined(x))\nFootling(julianne) and Inclined(julianne) -> Coastwise(julianne)\nCultivated(julianne) -> Coastwise(julianne)\nforall x (Coastwise(x) and Juiceless(x) -> Inner(x))\nCoastwise(julianne) -> not Unbroken(julianne)\nforall x (Juiceless(x) -> Footling(x))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) -> Footling(x))\nJuiceless(abdel) and not Coastwise(abdel) -> Inner(abdel)\n\nnot Footling(selby)\n\nJuiceless(selby) and forall x (Juiceless(x) -> Footling(x)) -> therefore Footling(selby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Cleva is baptistic. Cleva is shimmery. Lanie is baptistic. Lanie is coordinate. Lanie is not acuate. Lanie is duplicate. Leonhard is not blabby. Eleanore is baptistic. Eleanore is acuate. Eleanore is gone. Eleanore is duplicate. Eleanore is shimmery. If someone is shimmery then they are blabby. If Cleva is shimmery and Cleva is blabby then Cleva is duplicate. If Cleva is coordinate then Cleva is duplicate. All duplicate, baptistic people are gone. If Cleva is duplicate then Cleva is not acuate. All baptistic people are shimmery. Furry people are shimmery. If Eleanore is baptistic and Eleanore is not duplicate then Eleanore is gone. Cleva is duplicate.", "logic": "\nBaptistic(cleva)\nShimmery(cleva)\nBaptistic(lanie)\nCoordinate(lanie)\nnot Acuate(lanie)\nDuplicate(lanie)\nnot Blabby(leonhard)\nBaptistic(eleanore)\nAcuate(eleanore)\nGone(eleanore)\nDuplicate(eleanore)\nShimmery(eleanore)\nforall x (Shimmery(x) -> Blabby(x))\nShimmery(cleva) and Blabby(cleva) -> Duplicate(cleva)\nCoordinate(cleva) -> Duplicate(cleva)\nforall x (Duplicate(x) and Baptistic(x) -> Gone(x))\nDuplicate(cleva) -> not Acuate(cleva)\nforall x (Baptistic(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Acuate(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nBaptistic(eleanore) and not Duplicate(eleanore) -> Gone(eleanore)\n\nDuplicate(cleva)\n\nShimmery(cleva) and forall x (Shimmery(x) -> Blabby(x)) -> therefore Blabby(cleva) Shimmery(cleva) and Blabby(cleva) and Shimmery(cleva) and Blabby(cleva) -> Duplicate(cleva) -> therefore Duplicate(cleva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Mara is billed. Mara is deliberate. Paule is billed. Paule is telescoped. Paule is not nestorian. Paule is atactic. Imelda is not scriptural. Canada is billed. Canada is nestorian. Canada is epiphytic. Canada is atactic. Canada is deliberate. If someone is deliberate then they are scriptural. If Mara is deliberate and Mara is scriptural then Mara is atactic. If Mara is telescoped then Mara is atactic. All atactic, billed people are epiphytic. If Mara is atactic then Mara is not nestorian. All billed people are deliberate. Furry people are deliberate. If Canada is billed and Canada is not atactic then Canada is epiphytic. Mara is not atactic.", "logic": "\nBilled(mara)\nDeliberate(mara)\nBilled(paule)\nTelescoped(paule)\nnot Nestorian(paule)\nAtactic(paule)\nnot Scriptural(imelda)\nBilled(canada)\nNestorian(canada)\nEpiphytic(canada)\nAtactic(canada)\nDeliberate(canada)\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Scriptural(x))\nDeliberate(mara) and Scriptural(mara) -> Atactic(mara)\nTelescoped(mara) -> Atactic(mara)\nforall x (Atactic(x) and Billed(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\nAtactic(mara) -> not Nestorian(mara)\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nBilled(canada) and not Atactic(canada) -> Epiphytic(canada)\n\nnot Atactic(mara)\n\nDeliberate(mara) and forall x (Deliberate(x) -> Scriptural(x)) -> therefore Scriptural(mara) Deliberate(mara) and Scriptural(mara) and Deliberate(mara) and Scriptural(mara) -> Atactic(mara) -> therefore Atactic(mara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Clyde is arborical. Clyde is warmed. Mollee is arborical. Mollee is designed. Mollee is not unoiled. Mollee is seemly. Clemence is not hypaethral. Brandi is arborical. Brandi is unoiled. Brandi is forensic. Brandi is seemly. Brandi is warmed. If someone is warmed then they are hypaethral. If Clyde is warmed and Clyde is hypaethral then Clyde is seemly. If Clyde is designed then Clyde is seemly. All seemly, arborical people are forensic. If Clyde is seemly then Clyde is not unoiled. All arborical people are warmed. Furry people are warmed. If Brandi is arborical and Brandi is not seemly then Brandi is forensic. Clyde is not unoiled.", "logic": "\nArborical(clyde)\nWarmed(clyde)\nArborical(mollee)\nDesigned(mollee)\nnot Unoiled(mollee)\nSeemly(mollee)\nnot Hypaethral(clemence)\nArborical(brandi)\nUnoiled(brandi)\nForensic(brandi)\nSeemly(brandi)\nWarmed(brandi)\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\nWarmed(clyde) and Hypaethral(clyde) -> Seemly(clyde)\nDesigned(clyde) -> Seemly(clyde)\nforall x (Seemly(x) and Arborical(x) -> Forensic(x))\nSeemly(clyde) -> not Unoiled(clyde)\nforall x (Arborical(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> Warmed(x))\nArborical(brandi) and not Seemly(brandi) -> Forensic(brandi)\n\nnot Unoiled(clyde)\n\nWarmed(clyde) and forall x (Warmed(x) -> Hypaethral(x)) -> therefore Hypaethral(clyde) Warmed(clyde) and Hypaethral(clyde) and Warmed(clyde) and Hypaethral(clyde) -> Seemly(clyde) -> therefore Seemly(clyde) Seemly(clyde) and Seemly(clyde) -> not Unoiled(clyde) -> therefore not Unoiled(clyde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Yale is urbanised. Yale is envious. Britney is urbanised. Britney is raring. Britney is not flagellate. Britney is vowellike. Beilul is not aflutter. Miguel is urbanised. Miguel is flagellate. Miguel is standpat. Miguel is vowellike. Miguel is envious. If someone is envious then they are aflutter. If Yale is envious and Yale is aflutter then Yale is vowellike. If Yale is raring then Yale is vowellike. All vowellike, urbanised people are standpat. If Yale is vowellike then Yale is not flagellate. All urbanised people are envious. Furry people are envious. If Miguel is urbanised and Miguel is not vowellike then Miguel is standpat. Yale is flagellate.", "logic": "\nUrbanised(yale)\nEnvious(yale)\nUrbanised(britney)\nRaring(britney)\nnot Flagellate(britney)\nVowellike(britney)\nnot Aflutter(beilul)\nUrbanised(miguel)\nFlagellate(miguel)\nStandpat(miguel)\nVowellike(miguel)\nEnvious(miguel)\nforall x (Envious(x) -> Aflutter(x))\nEnvious(yale) and Aflutter(yale) -> Vowellike(yale)\nRaring(yale) -> Vowellike(yale)\nforall x (Vowellike(x) and Urbanised(x) -> Standpat(x))\nVowellike(yale) -> not Flagellate(yale)\nforall x (Urbanised(x) -> Envious(x))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) -> Envious(x))\nUrbanised(miguel) and not Vowellike(miguel) -> Standpat(miguel)\n\nFlagellate(yale)\n\nEnvious(yale) and forall x (Envious(x) -> Aflutter(x)) -> therefore Aflutter(yale) Envious(yale) and Aflutter(yale) and Envious(yale) and Aflutter(yale) -> Vowellike(yale) -> therefore Vowellike(yale) Vowellike(yale) and Vowellike(yale) -> not Flagellate(yale) -> therefore not Flagellate(yale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Ave is moonlit. Ave is caudal. Ricardo is moonlit. Ricardo is caliginous. Ricardo is not spent. Ricardo is tentative. Leoline is not northward. Aggy is moonlit. Aggy is spent. Aggy is dimorphous. Aggy is tentative. Aggy is caudal. If someone is caudal then they are northward. If Ave is caudal and Ave is northward then Ave is tentative. If Ave is caliginous then Ave is tentative. All tentative, moonlit people are dimorphous. If Ave is tentative then Ave is not spent. All moonlit people are caudal. Furry people are caudal. If Aggy is moonlit and Aggy is not tentative then Aggy is dimorphous. Leoline is not dimorphous.", "logic": "\nMoonlit(ave)\nCaudal(ave)\nMoonlit(ricardo)\nCaliginous(ricardo)\nnot Spent(ricardo)\nTentative(ricardo)\nnot Northward(leoline)\nMoonlit(aggy)\nSpent(aggy)\nDimorphous(aggy)\nTentative(aggy)\nCaudal(aggy)\nforall x (Caudal(x) -> Northward(x))\nCaudal(ave) and Northward(ave) -> Tentative(ave)\nCaliginous(ave) -> Tentative(ave)\nforall x (Tentative(x) and Moonlit(x) -> Dimorphous(x))\nTentative(ave) -> not Spent(ave)\nforall x (Moonlit(x) -> Caudal(x))\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Caudal(x))\nMoonlit(aggy) and not Tentative(aggy) -> Dimorphous(aggy)\n\nnot Dimorphous(leoline)\n\nforall x (Tentative(x) and Moonlit(x) -> Dimorphous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Roni is deathlike. Roni is directed. Rozelle is deathlike. Rozelle is peritoneal. Rozelle is not aloof. Rozelle is acinic. Nikkie is not covetous. Oralla is deathlike. Oralla is aloof. Oralla is leisured. Oralla is acinic. Oralla is directed. If someone is directed then they are covetous. If Roni is directed and Roni is covetous then Roni is acinic. If Roni is peritoneal then Roni is acinic. All acinic, deathlike people are leisured. If Roni is acinic then Roni is not aloof. All deathlike people are directed. Furry people are directed. If Oralla is deathlike and Oralla is not acinic then Oralla is leisured. Nikkie is directed.", "logic": "\nDeathlike(roni)\nDirected(roni)\nDeathlike(rozelle)\nPeritoneal(rozelle)\nnot Aloof(rozelle)\nAcinic(rozelle)\nnot Covetous(nikkie)\nDeathlike(oralla)\nAloof(oralla)\nLeisured(oralla)\nAcinic(oralla)\nDirected(oralla)\nforall x (Directed(x) -> Covetous(x))\nDirected(roni) and Covetous(roni) -> Acinic(roni)\nPeritoneal(roni) -> Acinic(roni)\nforall x (Acinic(x) and Deathlike(x) -> Leisured(x))\nAcinic(roni) -> not Aloof(roni)\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Directed(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Directed(x))\nDeathlike(oralla) and not Acinic(oralla) -> Leisured(oralla)\n\nDirected(nikkie)\n\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Directed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Jacquelyn is teenaged. Jacquelyn is tipped. Lona is teenaged. Lona is flattened. Lona is not leechlike. Lona is burlesque. Stillmann is not diurnal. Eimile is teenaged. Eimile is leechlike. Eimile is tattered. Eimile is burlesque. Eimile is tipped. If someone is tipped then they are diurnal. If Jacquelyn is tipped and Jacquelyn is diurnal then Jacquelyn is burlesque. If Jacquelyn is flattened then Jacquelyn is burlesque. All burlesque, teenaged people are tattered. If Jacquelyn is burlesque then Jacquelyn is not leechlike. All teenaged people are tipped. Furry people are tipped. If Eimile is teenaged and Eimile is not burlesque then Eimile is tattered. Jacquelyn is not flattened.", "logic": "\nTeenaged(jacquelyn)\nTipped(jacquelyn)\nTeenaged(lona)\nFlattened(lona)\nnot Leechlike(lona)\nBurlesque(lona)\nnot Diurnal(stillmann)\nTeenaged(eimile)\nLeechlike(eimile)\nTattered(eimile)\nBurlesque(eimile)\nTipped(eimile)\nforall x (Tipped(x) -> Diurnal(x))\nTipped(jacquelyn) and Diurnal(jacquelyn) -> Burlesque(jacquelyn)\nFlattened(jacquelyn) -> Burlesque(jacquelyn)\nforall x (Burlesque(x) and Teenaged(x) -> Tattered(x))\nBurlesque(jacquelyn) -> not Leechlike(jacquelyn)\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Tipped(x))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) -> Tipped(x))\nTeenaged(eimile) and not Burlesque(eimile) -> Tattered(eimile)\n\nnot Flattened(jacquelyn)\n\nnot Flattened(jacquelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Andres is hispid. Andres is ungodly. Alyson is hispid. Alyson is matt. Alyson is not amateur. Alyson is hoofed. Shayla is not forgivable. Saundra is hispid. Saundra is amateur. Saundra is squelched. Saundra is hoofed. Saundra is ungodly. If someone is ungodly then they are forgivable. If Andres is ungodly and Andres is forgivable then Andres is hoofed. If Andres is matt then Andres is hoofed. All hoofed, hispid people are squelched. If Andres is hoofed then Andres is not amateur. All hispid people are ungodly. Furry people are ungodly. If Saundra is hispid and Saundra is not hoofed then Saundra is squelched. Shayla is matt.", "logic": "\nHispid(andres)\nUngodly(andres)\nHispid(alyson)\nMatt(alyson)\nnot Amateur(alyson)\nHoofed(alyson)\nnot Forgivable(shayla)\nHispid(saundra)\nAmateur(saundra)\nSquelched(saundra)\nHoofed(saundra)\nUngodly(saundra)\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> Forgivable(x))\nUngodly(andres) and Forgivable(andres) -> Hoofed(andres)\nMatt(andres) -> Hoofed(andres)\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Hispid(x) -> Squelched(x))\nHoofed(andres) -> not Amateur(andres)\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Ungodly(x))\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Ungodly(x))\nHispid(saundra) and not Hoofed(saundra) -> Squelched(saundra)\n\nMatt(shayla)\n\nMatt(shayla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Orton is knockabout. Orton is irate. Vasily is knockabout. Vasily is juvenile. Vasily is not beardless. Vasily is greatest. Eda is not uncropped. Mandi is knockabout. Mandi is beardless. Mandi is refractive. Mandi is greatest. Mandi is irate. If someone is irate then they are uncropped. If Orton is irate and Orton is uncropped then Orton is greatest. If Orton is juvenile then Orton is greatest. All greatest, knockabout people are refractive. If Orton is greatest then Orton is not beardless. All knockabout people are irate. Furry people are irate. If Mandi is knockabout and Mandi is not greatest then Mandi is refractive. Mandi is not juvenile.", "logic": "\nKnockabout(orton)\nIrate(orton)\nKnockabout(vasily)\nJuvenile(vasily)\nnot Beardless(vasily)\nGreatest(vasily)\nnot Uncropped(eda)\nKnockabout(mandi)\nBeardless(mandi)\nRefractive(mandi)\nGreatest(mandi)\nIrate(mandi)\nforall x (Irate(x) -> Uncropped(x))\nIrate(orton) and Uncropped(orton) -> Greatest(orton)\nJuvenile(orton) -> Greatest(orton)\nforall x (Greatest(x) and Knockabout(x) -> Refractive(x))\nGreatest(orton) -> not Beardless(orton)\nforall x (Knockabout(x) -> Irate(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Irate(x))\nKnockabout(mandi) and not Greatest(mandi) -> Refractive(mandi)\n\nnot Juvenile(mandi)\n\nnot Juvenile(mandi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Demetria is stoppable. Demetria is benighted. Deryl is stoppable. Deryl is onside. Deryl is not veinlike. Deryl is prosaic. Rosa is not piecemeal. Codi is stoppable. Codi is veinlike. Codi is analyzable. Codi is prosaic. Codi is benighted. If someone is benighted then they are piecemeal. If Demetria is benighted and Demetria is piecemeal then Demetria is prosaic. If Demetria is onside then Demetria is prosaic. All prosaic, stoppable people are analyzable. If Demetria is prosaic then Demetria is not veinlike. All stoppable people are benighted. Furry people are benighted. If Codi is stoppable and Codi is not prosaic then Codi is analyzable. Rosa is stoppable.", "logic": "\nStoppable(demetria)\nBenighted(demetria)\nStoppable(deryl)\nOnside(deryl)\nnot Veinlike(deryl)\nProsaic(deryl)\nnot Piecemeal(rosa)\nStoppable(codi)\nVeinlike(codi)\nAnalyzable(codi)\nProsaic(codi)\nBenighted(codi)\nforall x (Benighted(x) -> Piecemeal(x))\nBenighted(demetria) and Piecemeal(demetria) -> Prosaic(demetria)\nOnside(demetria) -> Prosaic(demetria)\nforall x (Prosaic(x) and Stoppable(x) -> Analyzable(x))\nProsaic(demetria) -> not Veinlike(demetria)\nforall x (Stoppable(x) -> Benighted(x))\nforall x (Veinlike(x) -> Benighted(x))\nStoppable(codi) and not Prosaic(codi) -> Analyzable(codi)\n\nStoppable(rosa)\n\nStoppable(rosa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Meredithe is grazed. Meredithe is drear. Otis is grazed. Otis is peripteral. Otis is not naive. Otis is sacred. Jemima is not ovarian. Gamaliel is grazed. Gamaliel is naive. Gamaliel is unromantic. Gamaliel is sacred. Gamaliel is drear. If someone is drear then they are ovarian. If Meredithe is drear and Meredithe is ovarian then Meredithe is sacred. If Meredithe is peripteral then Meredithe is sacred. All sacred, grazed people are unromantic. If Meredithe is sacred then Meredithe is not naive. All grazed people are drear. Furry people are drear. If Gamaliel is grazed and Gamaliel is not sacred then Gamaliel is unromantic. Jemima is not naive.", "logic": "\nGrazed(meredithe)\nDrear(meredithe)\nGrazed(otis)\nPeripteral(otis)\nnot Naive(otis)\nSacred(otis)\nnot Ovarian(jemima)\nGrazed(gamaliel)\nNaive(gamaliel)\nUnromantic(gamaliel)\nSacred(gamaliel)\nDrear(gamaliel)\nforall x (Drear(x) -> Ovarian(x))\nDrear(meredithe) and Ovarian(meredithe) -> Sacred(meredithe)\nPeripteral(meredithe) -> Sacred(meredithe)\nforall x (Sacred(x) and Grazed(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nSacred(meredithe) -> not Naive(meredithe)\nforall x (Grazed(x) -> Drear(x))\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Drear(x))\nGrazed(gamaliel) and not Sacred(gamaliel) -> Unromantic(gamaliel)\n\nnot Naive(jemima)\n\nnot Naive(jemima) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Meredithe is apnoeic. Meredithe is haunting. Elizabeth is apnoeic. Elizabeth is mystifying. Elizabeth is not continuant. Elizabeth is insatiate. Amalita is not autarkic. Deena is apnoeic. Deena is continuant. Deena is hymeneal. Deena is insatiate. Deena is haunting. If someone is haunting then they are autarkic. If Meredithe is haunting and Meredithe is autarkic then Meredithe is insatiate. If Meredithe is mystifying then Meredithe is insatiate. All insatiate, apnoeic people are hymeneal. If Meredithe is insatiate then Meredithe is not continuant. All apnoeic people are haunting. Furry people are haunting. If Deena is apnoeic and Deena is not insatiate then Deena is hymeneal. Amalita is insatiate.", "logic": "\nApnoeic(meredithe)\nHaunting(meredithe)\nApnoeic(elizabeth)\nMystifying(elizabeth)\nnot Continuant(elizabeth)\nInsatiate(elizabeth)\nnot Autarkic(amalita)\nApnoeic(deena)\nContinuant(deena)\nHymeneal(deena)\nInsatiate(deena)\nHaunting(deena)\nforall x (Haunting(x) -> Autarkic(x))\nHaunting(meredithe) and Autarkic(meredithe) -> Insatiate(meredithe)\nMystifying(meredithe) -> Insatiate(meredithe)\nforall x (Insatiate(x) and Apnoeic(x) -> Hymeneal(x))\nInsatiate(meredithe) -> not Continuant(meredithe)\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) -> Haunting(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Haunting(x))\nApnoeic(deena) and not Insatiate(deena) -> Hymeneal(deena)\n\nInsatiate(amalita)\n\nInsatiate(amalita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "The wojciech comment the rosemarie. The wojciech is baseless. The wojciech is xliii. The wojciech carbonise the rosemarie. The wojciech penetrate the rosemarie. The jorrie comment the rosemarie. The jorrie carbonise the rosemarie. The gunther comment the wojciech. The gunther comment the jorrie. The gunther comment the rosemarie. The gunther is baseless. The gunther carbonise the jorrie. The gunther penetrate the jorrie. The rosemarie carbonise the wojciech. The rosemarie carbonise the gunther. The rosemarie penetrate the wojciech. If something carbonise the wojciech then it carbonise the gunther. If something is wooded then it carbonise the rosemarie. If the rosemarie penetrate the wojciech then the rosemarie carbonise the wojciech. If the wojciech is algal and the wojciech penetrate the rosemarie then the rosemarie carbonise the jorrie. If something is xliii and it penetrate the gunther then it carbonise the rosemarie. If something carbonise the rosemarie then it penetrate the gunther. If something carbonise the wojciech then it is wooded. If something penetrate the rosemarie then it penetrate the jorrie. The wojciech is xliii.", "logic": "\nComment(wojciech, rosemarie)\nBaseless(wojciech)\nXliii(wojciech)\nCarbonise(wojciech, rosemarie)\nPenetrate(wojciech, rosemarie)\nComment(jorrie, rosemarie)\nCarbonise(jorrie, rosemarie)\nComment(gunther, wojciech)\nComment(gunther, jorrie)\nComment(gunther, rosemarie)\nBaseless(gunther)\nCarbonise(gunther, jorrie)\nPenetrate(gunther, jorrie)\nCarbonise(rosemarie, wojciech)\nCarbonise(rosemarie, gunther)\nPenetrate(rosemarie, wojciech)\nforall x (Carbonise(x, wojciech) -> Carbonise(x, gunther))\nforall x (Wooded(x) -> Carbonise(x, rosemarie))\nPenetrate(rosemarie, wojciech) -> Carbonise(rosemarie, wojciech)\nAlgal(wojciech) and Penetrate(wojciech, rosemarie) -> Carbonise(rosemarie, jorrie)\nforall x (Xliii(x) and Penetrate(x, gunther) -> Carbonise(x, rosemarie))\nforall x (Carbonise(x, rosemarie) -> Penetrate(x, gunther))\nforall x (Carbonise(x, wojciech) -> Wooded(x))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, rosemarie) -> Penetrate(x, jorrie))\n\nXliii(wojciech)\n\ntherefore Xliii(wojciech)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The nidia discourse the valli. The nidia is uric. The nidia is foliolate. The nidia pride the valli. The nidia localise the valli. The leonidas discourse the valli. The leonidas pride the valli. The cindie discourse the nidia. The cindie discourse the leonidas. The cindie discourse the valli. The cindie is uric. The cindie pride the leonidas. The cindie localise the leonidas. The valli pride the nidia. The valli pride the cindie. The valli localise the nidia. If something pride the nidia then it pride the cindie. If something is weekly then it pride the valli. If the valli localise the nidia then the valli pride the nidia. If the nidia is viceregal and the nidia localise the valli then the valli pride the leonidas. If something is foliolate and it localise the cindie then it pride the valli. If something pride the valli then it localise the cindie. If something pride the nidia then it is weekly. If something localise the valli then it localise the leonidas. The nidia does not chase the valli.", "logic": "\nDiscourse(nidia, valli)\nUric(nidia)\nFoliolate(nidia)\nPride(nidia, valli)\nLocalise(nidia, valli)\nDiscourse(leonidas, valli)\nPride(leonidas, valli)\nDiscourse(cindie, nidia)\nDiscourse(cindie, leonidas)\nDiscourse(cindie, valli)\nUric(cindie)\nPride(cindie, leonidas)\nLocalise(cindie, leonidas)\nPride(valli, nidia)\nPride(valli, cindie)\nLocalise(valli, nidia)\nforall x (Pride(x, nidia) -> Pride(x, cindie))\nforall x (Weekly(x) -> Pride(x, valli))\nLocalise(valli, nidia) -> Pride(valli, nidia)\nViceregal(nidia) and Localise(nidia, valli) -> Pride(valli, leonidas)\nforall x (Foliolate(x) and Localise(x, cindie) -> Pride(x, valli))\nforall x (Pride(x, valli) -> Localise(x, cindie))\nforall x (Pride(x, nidia) -> Weekly(x))\nforall x (Localise(x, valli) -> Localise(x, leonidas))\n\nnot Discourse(nidia, valli)\n\ntherefore Discourse(nidia, valli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The dabney flame the darla. The dabney is ingenious. The dabney is needlelike. The dabney devitalize the darla. The dabney reform the darla. The woody flame the darla. The woody devitalize the darla. The roxanne flame the dabney. The roxanne flame the woody. The roxanne flame the darla. The roxanne is ingenious. The roxanne devitalize the woody. The roxanne reform the woody. The darla devitalize the dabney. The darla devitalize the roxanne. The darla reform the dabney. If something devitalize the dabney then it devitalize the roxanne. If something is ungraceful then it devitalize the darla. If the darla reform the dabney then the darla devitalize the dabney. If the dabney is edentulate and the dabney reform the darla then the darla devitalize the woody. If something is needlelike and it reform the roxanne then it devitalize the darla. If something devitalize the darla then it reform the roxanne. If something devitalize the dabney then it is ungraceful. If something reform the darla then it reform the woody. The dabney reform the roxanne.", "logic": "\nFlame(dabney, darla)\nIngenious(dabney)\nNeedlelike(dabney)\nDevitalize(dabney, darla)\nReform(dabney, darla)\nFlame(woody, darla)\nDevitalize(woody, darla)\nFlame(roxanne, dabney)\nFlame(roxanne, woody)\nFlame(roxanne, darla)\nIngenious(roxanne)\nDevitalize(roxanne, woody)\nReform(roxanne, woody)\nDevitalize(darla, dabney)\nDevitalize(darla, roxanne)\nReform(darla, dabney)\nforall x (Devitalize(x, dabney) -> Devitalize(x, roxanne))\nforall x (Ungraceful(x) -> Devitalize(x, darla))\nReform(darla, dabney) -> Devitalize(darla, dabney)\nEdentulate(dabney) and Reform(dabney, darla) -> Devitalize(darla, woody)\nforall x (Needlelike(x) and Reform(x, roxanne) -> Devitalize(x, darla))\nforall x (Devitalize(x, darla) -> Reform(x, roxanne))\nforall x (Devitalize(x, dabney) -> Ungraceful(x))\nforall x (Reform(x, darla) -> Reform(x, woody))\n\nReform(dabney, roxanne)\n\nDevitalize(dabney, darla) and forall x (Devitalize(x, darla) -> Reform(x, roxanne)) -> therefore Reform(dabney, roxanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The garland dizzy the geof. The garland is bellicose. The garland is prickly. The garland interleave the geof. The garland menstruate the geof. The darlene dizzy the geof. The darlene interleave the geof. The skye dizzy the garland. The skye dizzy the darlene. The skye dizzy the geof. The skye is bellicose. The skye interleave the darlene. The skye menstruate the darlene. The geof interleave the garland. The geof interleave the skye. The geof menstruate the garland. If something interleave the garland then it interleave the skye. If something is undutiful then it interleave the geof. If the geof menstruate the garland then the geof interleave the garland. If the garland is derogative and the garland menstruate the geof then the geof interleave the darlene. If something is prickly and it menstruate the skye then it interleave the geof. If something interleave the geof then it menstruate the skye. If something interleave the garland then it is undutiful. If something menstruate the geof then it menstruate the darlene. The garland does not see the darlene.", "logic": "\nDizzy(garland, geof)\nBellicose(garland)\nPrickly(garland)\nInterleave(garland, geof)\nMenstruate(garland, geof)\nDizzy(darlene, geof)\nInterleave(darlene, geof)\nDizzy(skye, garland)\nDizzy(skye, darlene)\nDizzy(skye, geof)\nBellicose(skye)\nInterleave(skye, darlene)\nMenstruate(skye, darlene)\nInterleave(geof, garland)\nInterleave(geof, skye)\nMenstruate(geof, garland)\nforall x (Interleave(x, garland) -> Interleave(x, skye))\nforall x (Undutiful(x) -> Interleave(x, geof))\nMenstruate(geof, garland) -> Interleave(geof, garland)\nDerogative(garland) and Menstruate(garland, geof) -> Interleave(geof, darlene)\nforall x (Prickly(x) and Menstruate(x, skye) -> Interleave(x, geof))\nforall x (Interleave(x, geof) -> Menstruate(x, skye))\nforall x (Interleave(x, garland) -> Undutiful(x))\nforall x (Menstruate(x, geof) -> Menstruate(x, darlene))\n\nnot Menstruate(garland, darlene)\n\nMenstruate(garland, geof) and forall x (Menstruate(x, geof) -> Menstruate(x, darlene)) -> therefore Menstruate(garland, darlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The jennette refute the kerry. The jennette is nervy. The jennette is belated. The jennette criticise the kerry. The jennette solo the kerry. The udell refute the kerry. The udell criticise the kerry. The vickie refute the jennette. The vickie refute the udell. The vickie refute the kerry. The vickie is nervy. The vickie criticise the udell. The vickie solo the udell. The kerry criticise the jennette. The kerry criticise the vickie. The kerry solo the jennette. If something criticise the jennette then it criticise the vickie. If something is hybrid then it criticise the kerry. If the kerry solo the jennette then the kerry criticise the jennette. If the jennette is boxlike and the jennette solo the kerry then the kerry criticise the udell. If something is belated and it solo the vickie then it criticise the kerry. If something criticise the kerry then it solo the vickie. If something criticise the jennette then it is hybrid. If something solo the kerry then it solo the udell. The kerry criticise the kerry.", "logic": "\nRefute(jennette, kerry)\nNervy(jennette)\nBelated(jennette)\nCriticise(jennette, kerry)\nSolo(jennette, kerry)\nRefute(udell, kerry)\nCriticise(udell, kerry)\nRefute(vickie, jennette)\nRefute(vickie, udell)\nRefute(vickie, kerry)\nNervy(vickie)\nCriticise(vickie, udell)\nSolo(vickie, udell)\nCriticise(kerry, jennette)\nCriticise(kerry, vickie)\nSolo(kerry, jennette)\nforall x (Criticise(x, jennette) -> Criticise(x, vickie))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) -> Criticise(x, kerry))\nSolo(kerry, jennette) -> Criticise(kerry, jennette)\nBoxlike(jennette) and Solo(jennette, kerry) -> Criticise(kerry, udell)\nforall x (Belated(x) and Solo(x, vickie) -> Criticise(x, kerry))\nforall x (Criticise(x, kerry) -> Solo(x, vickie))\nforall x (Criticise(x, jennette) -> Hybrid(x))\nforall x (Solo(x, kerry) -> Solo(x, udell))\n\nCriticise(kerry, kerry)\n\nCriticise(kerry, jennette) and forall x (Criticise(x, jennette) -> Hybrid(x)) -> therefore Hybrid(kerry) Hybrid(kerry) and forall x (Hybrid(x) -> Criticise(x, kerry)) -> therefore Criticise(kerry, kerry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The flo remainder the parry. The flo is scathing. The flo is undrained. The flo adjoin the parry. The flo pestle the parry. The sherlock remainder the parry. The sherlock adjoin the parry. The trude remainder the flo. The trude remainder the sherlock. The trude remainder the parry. The trude is scathing. The trude adjoin the sherlock. The trude pestle the sherlock. The parry adjoin the flo. The parry adjoin the trude. The parry pestle the flo. If something adjoin the flo then it adjoin the trude. If something is winning then it adjoin the parry. If the parry pestle the flo then the parry adjoin the flo. If the flo is banner and the flo pestle the parry then the parry adjoin the sherlock. If something is undrained and it pestle the trude then it adjoin the parry. If something adjoin the parry then it pestle the trude. If something adjoin the flo then it is winning. If something pestle the parry then it pestle the sherlock. The parry does not need the parry.", "logic": "\nRemainder(flo, parry)\nScathing(flo)\nUndrained(flo)\nAdjoin(flo, parry)\nPestle(flo, parry)\nRemainder(sherlock, parry)\nAdjoin(sherlock, parry)\nRemainder(trude, flo)\nRemainder(trude, sherlock)\nRemainder(trude, parry)\nScathing(trude)\nAdjoin(trude, sherlock)\nPestle(trude, sherlock)\nAdjoin(parry, flo)\nAdjoin(parry, trude)\nPestle(parry, flo)\nforall x (Adjoin(x, flo) -> Adjoin(x, trude))\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Adjoin(x, parry))\nPestle(parry, flo) -> Adjoin(parry, flo)\nBanner(flo) and Pestle(flo, parry) -> Adjoin(parry, sherlock)\nforall x (Undrained(x) and Pestle(x, trude) -> Adjoin(x, parry))\nforall x (Adjoin(x, parry) -> Pestle(x, trude))\nforall x (Adjoin(x, flo) -> Winning(x))\nforall x (Pestle(x, parry) -> Pestle(x, sherlock))\n\nnot Adjoin(parry, parry)\n\nAdjoin(parry, flo) and forall x (Adjoin(x, flo) -> Winning(x)) -> therefore Winning(parry) Winning(parry) and forall x (Winning(x) -> Adjoin(x, parry)) -> therefore Adjoin(parry, parry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The matthiew bird the jacqui. The matthiew is susurrous. The matthiew is foliolate. The matthiew induct the jacqui. The matthiew cocainize the jacqui. The sissy bird the jacqui. The sissy induct the jacqui. The feodora bird the matthiew. The feodora bird the sissy. The feodora bird the jacqui. The feodora is susurrous. The feodora induct the sissy. The feodora cocainize the sissy. The jacqui induct the matthiew. The jacqui induct the feodora. The jacqui cocainize the matthiew. If something induct the matthiew then it induct the feodora. If something is worthwhile then it induct the jacqui. If the jacqui cocainize the matthiew then the jacqui induct the matthiew. If the matthiew is prepacked and the matthiew cocainize the jacqui then the jacqui induct the sissy. If something is foliolate and it cocainize the feodora then it induct the jacqui. If something induct the jacqui then it cocainize the feodora. If something induct the matthiew then it is worthwhile. If something cocainize the jacqui then it cocainize the sissy. The jacqui cocainize the feodora.", "logic": "\nBird(matthiew, jacqui)\nSusurrous(matthiew)\nFoliolate(matthiew)\nInduct(matthiew, jacqui)\nCocainize(matthiew, jacqui)\nBird(sissy, jacqui)\nInduct(sissy, jacqui)\nBird(feodora, matthiew)\nBird(feodora, sissy)\nBird(feodora, jacqui)\nSusurrous(feodora)\nInduct(feodora, sissy)\nCocainize(feodora, sissy)\nInduct(jacqui, matthiew)\nInduct(jacqui, feodora)\nCocainize(jacqui, matthiew)\nforall x (Induct(x, matthiew) -> Induct(x, feodora))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Induct(x, jacqui))\nCocainize(jacqui, matthiew) -> Induct(jacqui, matthiew)\nPrepacked(matthiew) and Cocainize(matthiew, jacqui) -> Induct(jacqui, sissy)\nforall x (Foliolate(x) and Cocainize(x, feodora) -> Induct(x, jacqui))\nforall x (Induct(x, jacqui) -> Cocainize(x, feodora))\nforall x (Induct(x, matthiew) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Cocainize(x, jacqui) -> Cocainize(x, sissy))\n\nCocainize(jacqui, feodora)\n\nInduct(jacqui, matthiew) and forall x (Induct(x, matthiew) -> Worthwhile(x)) -> therefore Worthwhile(jacqui) Worthwhile(jacqui) and forall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Induct(x, jacqui)) -> therefore Induct(jacqui, jacqui) Induct(jacqui, jacqui) and forall x (Induct(x, jacqui) -> Cocainize(x, feodora)) -> therefore Cocainize(jacqui, feodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The kerrill promulgate the tess. The kerrill is extralegal. The kerrill is woodsy. The kerrill harden the tess. The kerrill strop the tess. The lorine promulgate the tess. The lorine harden the tess. The jill promulgate the kerrill. The jill promulgate the lorine. The jill promulgate the tess. The jill is extralegal. The jill harden the lorine. The jill strop the lorine. The tess harden the kerrill. The tess harden the jill. The tess strop the kerrill. If something harden the kerrill then it harden the jill. If something is dashing then it harden the tess. If the tess strop the kerrill then the tess harden the kerrill. If the kerrill is seljuk and the kerrill strop the tess then the tess harden the lorine. If something is woodsy and it strop the jill then it harden the tess. If something harden the tess then it strop the jill. If something harden the kerrill then it is dashing. If something strop the tess then it strop the lorine. The tess does not see the jill.", "logic": "\nPromulgate(kerrill, tess)\nExtralegal(kerrill)\nWoodsy(kerrill)\nHarden(kerrill, tess)\nStrop(kerrill, tess)\nPromulgate(lorine, tess)\nHarden(lorine, tess)\nPromulgate(jill, kerrill)\nPromulgate(jill, lorine)\nPromulgate(jill, tess)\nExtralegal(jill)\nHarden(jill, lorine)\nStrop(jill, lorine)\nHarden(tess, kerrill)\nHarden(tess, jill)\nStrop(tess, kerrill)\nforall x (Harden(x, kerrill) -> Harden(x, jill))\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Harden(x, tess))\nStrop(tess, kerrill) -> Harden(tess, kerrill)\nSeljuk(kerrill) and Strop(kerrill, tess) -> Harden(tess, lorine)\nforall x (Woodsy(x) and Strop(x, jill) -> Harden(x, tess))\nforall x (Harden(x, tess) -> Strop(x, jill))\nforall x (Harden(x, kerrill) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Strop(x, tess) -> Strop(x, lorine))\n\nnot Strop(tess, jill)\n\nHarden(tess, kerrill) and forall x (Harden(x, kerrill) -> Dashing(x)) -> therefore Dashing(tess) Dashing(tess) and forall x (Dashing(x) -> Harden(x, tess)) -> therefore Harden(tess, tess) Harden(tess, tess) and forall x (Harden(x, tess) -> Strop(x, jill)) -> therefore Strop(tess, jill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The analiese cruise the jervis. The analiese is intended. The analiese is burundian. The analiese consonate the jervis. The analiese collocate the jervis. The tobin cruise the jervis. The tobin consonate the jervis. The eva cruise the analiese. The eva cruise the tobin. The eva cruise the jervis. The eva is intended. The eva consonate the tobin. The eva collocate the tobin. The jervis consonate the analiese. The jervis consonate the eva. The jervis collocate the analiese. If something consonate the analiese then it consonate the eva. If something is palliative then it consonate the jervis. If the jervis collocate the analiese then the jervis consonate the analiese. If the analiese is ravaged and the analiese collocate the jervis then the jervis consonate the tobin. If something is burundian and it collocate the eva then it consonate the jervis. If something consonate the jervis then it collocate the eva. If something consonate the analiese then it is palliative. If something collocate the jervis then it collocate the tobin. The analiese does not need the eva.", "logic": "\nCruise(analiese, jervis)\nIntended(analiese)\nBurundian(analiese)\nConsonate(analiese, jervis)\nCollocate(analiese, jervis)\nCruise(tobin, jervis)\nConsonate(tobin, jervis)\nCruise(eva, analiese)\nCruise(eva, tobin)\nCruise(eva, jervis)\nIntended(eva)\nConsonate(eva, tobin)\nCollocate(eva, tobin)\nConsonate(jervis, analiese)\nConsonate(jervis, eva)\nCollocate(jervis, analiese)\nforall x (Consonate(x, analiese) -> Consonate(x, eva))\nforall x (Palliative(x) -> Consonate(x, jervis))\nCollocate(jervis, analiese) -> Consonate(jervis, analiese)\nRavaged(analiese) and Collocate(analiese, jervis) -> Consonate(jervis, tobin)\nforall x (Burundian(x) and Collocate(x, eva) -> Consonate(x, jervis))\nforall x (Consonate(x, jervis) -> Collocate(x, eva))\nforall x (Consonate(x, analiese) -> Palliative(x))\nforall x (Collocate(x, jervis) -> Collocate(x, tobin))\n\nnot Consonate(analiese, eva)\n\nforall x (Consonate(x, analiese) -> Consonate(x, eva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The gabriele leach the tobit. The gabriele is invalid. The gabriele is futuristic. The gabriele hand the tobit. The gabriele bejewel the tobit. The fania leach the tobit. The fania hand the tobit. The brandea leach the gabriele. The brandea leach the fania. The brandea leach the tobit. The brandea is invalid. The brandea hand the fania. The brandea bejewel the fania. The tobit hand the gabriele. The tobit hand the brandea. The tobit bejewel the gabriele. If something hand the gabriele then it hand the brandea. If something is argent then it hand the tobit. If the tobit bejewel the gabriele then the tobit hand the gabriele. If the gabriele is chestnut and the gabriele bejewel the tobit then the tobit hand the fania. If something is futuristic and it bejewel the brandea then it hand the tobit. If something hand the tobit then it bejewel the brandea. If something hand the gabriele then it is argent. If something bejewel the tobit then it bejewel the fania. The tobit bejewel the fania.", "logic": "\nLeach(gabriele, tobit)\nInvalid(gabriele)\nFuturistic(gabriele)\nHand(gabriele, tobit)\nBejewel(gabriele, tobit)\nLeach(fania, tobit)\nHand(fania, tobit)\nLeach(brandea, gabriele)\nLeach(brandea, fania)\nLeach(brandea, tobit)\nInvalid(brandea)\nHand(brandea, fania)\nBejewel(brandea, fania)\nHand(tobit, gabriele)\nHand(tobit, brandea)\nBejewel(tobit, gabriele)\nforall x (Hand(x, gabriele) -> Hand(x, brandea))\nforall x (Argent(x) -> Hand(x, tobit))\nBejewel(tobit, gabriele) -> Hand(tobit, gabriele)\nChestnut(gabriele) and Bejewel(gabriele, tobit) -> Hand(tobit, fania)\nforall x (Futuristic(x) and Bejewel(x, brandea) -> Hand(x, tobit))\nforall x (Hand(x, tobit) -> Bejewel(x, brandea))\nforall x (Hand(x, gabriele) -> Argent(x))\nforall x (Bejewel(x, tobit) -> Bejewel(x, fania))\n\nBejewel(tobit, fania)\n\nforall x (Bejewel(x, tobit) -> Bejewel(x, fania)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The piotr identify the orrin. The piotr is inconstant. The piotr is fulsome. The piotr maltreat the orrin. The piotr game the orrin. The sam identify the orrin. The sam maltreat the orrin. The gratia identify the piotr. The gratia identify the sam. The gratia identify the orrin. The gratia is inconstant. The gratia maltreat the sam. The gratia game the sam. The orrin maltreat the piotr. The orrin maltreat the gratia. The orrin game the piotr. If something maltreat the piotr then it maltreat the gratia. If something is gyral then it maltreat the orrin. If the orrin game the piotr then the orrin maltreat the piotr. If the piotr is starchlike and the piotr game the orrin then the orrin maltreat the sam. If something is fulsome and it game the gratia then it maltreat the orrin. If something maltreat the orrin then it game the gratia. If something maltreat the piotr then it is gyral. If something game the orrin then it game the sam. The gratia does not see the gratia.", "logic": "\nIdentify(piotr, orrin)\nInconstant(piotr)\nFulsome(piotr)\nMaltreat(piotr, orrin)\nGame(piotr, orrin)\nIdentify(sam, orrin)\nMaltreat(sam, orrin)\nIdentify(gratia, piotr)\nIdentify(gratia, sam)\nIdentify(gratia, orrin)\nInconstant(gratia)\nMaltreat(gratia, sam)\nGame(gratia, sam)\nMaltreat(orrin, piotr)\nMaltreat(orrin, gratia)\nGame(orrin, piotr)\nforall x (Maltreat(x, piotr) -> Maltreat(x, gratia))\nforall x (Gyral(x) -> Maltreat(x, orrin))\nGame(orrin, piotr) -> Maltreat(orrin, piotr)\nStarchlike(piotr) and Game(piotr, orrin) -> Maltreat(orrin, sam)\nforall x (Fulsome(x) and Game(x, gratia) -> Maltreat(x, orrin))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, orrin) -> Game(x, gratia))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, piotr) -> Gyral(x))\nforall x (Game(x, orrin) -> Game(x, sam))\n\nnot Game(gratia, gratia)\n\nforall x (Maltreat(x, orrin) -> Game(x, gratia)) <- forall x (Gyral(x) -> Maltreat(x, orrin)) <- forall x (Maltreat(x, piotr) -> Gyral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The joellen recap the deeanne. The joellen is annular. The joellen is livid. The joellen prettify the deeanne. The joellen sellotape the deeanne. The willamina recap the deeanne. The willamina prettify the deeanne. The faustina recap the joellen. The faustina recap the willamina. The faustina recap the deeanne. The faustina is annular. The faustina prettify the willamina. The faustina sellotape the willamina. The deeanne prettify the joellen. The deeanne prettify the faustina. The deeanne sellotape the joellen. If something prettify the joellen then it prettify the faustina. If something is aecial then it prettify the deeanne. If the deeanne sellotape the joellen then the deeanne prettify the joellen. If the joellen is unarmoured and the joellen sellotape the deeanne then the deeanne prettify the willamina. If something is livid and it sellotape the faustina then it prettify the deeanne. If something prettify the deeanne then it sellotape the faustina. If something prettify the joellen then it is aecial. If something sellotape the deeanne then it sellotape the willamina. The faustina prettify the deeanne.", "logic": "\nRecap(joellen, deeanne)\nAnnular(joellen)\nLivid(joellen)\nPrettify(joellen, deeanne)\nSellotape(joellen, deeanne)\nRecap(willamina, deeanne)\nPrettify(willamina, deeanne)\nRecap(faustina, joellen)\nRecap(faustina, willamina)\nRecap(faustina, deeanne)\nAnnular(faustina)\nPrettify(faustina, willamina)\nSellotape(faustina, willamina)\nPrettify(deeanne, joellen)\nPrettify(deeanne, faustina)\nSellotape(deeanne, joellen)\nforall x (Prettify(x, joellen) -> Prettify(x, faustina))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Prettify(x, deeanne))\nSellotape(deeanne, joellen) -> Prettify(deeanne, joellen)\nUnarmoured(joellen) and Sellotape(joellen, deeanne) -> Prettify(deeanne, willamina)\nforall x (Livid(x) and Sellotape(x, faustina) -> Prettify(x, deeanne))\nforall x (Prettify(x, deeanne) -> Sellotape(x, faustina))\nforall x (Prettify(x, joellen) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, deeanne) -> Sellotape(x, willamina))\n\nPrettify(faustina, deeanne)\n\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Prettify(x, deeanne)) <- forall x (Prettify(x, joellen) -> Aecial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The owen merit the eloisa. The owen is zygotic. The owen is collateral. The owen foredoom the eloisa. The owen bombilate the eloisa. The dinny merit the eloisa. The dinny foredoom the eloisa. The lilas merit the owen. The lilas merit the dinny. The lilas merit the eloisa. The lilas is zygotic. The lilas foredoom the dinny. The lilas bombilate the dinny. The eloisa foredoom the owen. The eloisa foredoom the lilas. The eloisa bombilate the owen. If something foredoom the owen then it foredoom the lilas. If something is covered then it foredoom the eloisa. If the eloisa bombilate the owen then the eloisa foredoom the owen. If the owen is allelic and the owen bombilate the eloisa then the eloisa foredoom the dinny. If something is collateral and it bombilate the lilas then it foredoom the eloisa. If something foredoom the eloisa then it bombilate the lilas. If something foredoom the owen then it is covered. If something bombilate the eloisa then it bombilate the dinny. The eloisa does not chase the eloisa.", "logic": "\nMerit(owen, eloisa)\nZygotic(owen)\nCollateral(owen)\nForedoom(owen, eloisa)\nBombilate(owen, eloisa)\nMerit(dinny, eloisa)\nForedoom(dinny, eloisa)\nMerit(lilas, owen)\nMerit(lilas, dinny)\nMerit(lilas, eloisa)\nZygotic(lilas)\nForedoom(lilas, dinny)\nBombilate(lilas, dinny)\nForedoom(eloisa, owen)\nForedoom(eloisa, lilas)\nBombilate(eloisa, owen)\nforall x (Foredoom(x, owen) -> Foredoom(x, lilas))\nforall x (Covered(x) -> Foredoom(x, eloisa))\nBombilate(eloisa, owen) -> Foredoom(eloisa, owen)\nAllelic(owen) and Bombilate(owen, eloisa) -> Foredoom(eloisa, dinny)\nforall x (Collateral(x) and Bombilate(x, lilas) -> Foredoom(x, eloisa))\nforall x (Foredoom(x, eloisa) -> Bombilate(x, lilas))\nforall x (Foredoom(x, owen) -> Covered(x))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, eloisa) -> Bombilate(x, dinny))\n\nnot Merit(eloisa, eloisa)\n\nnot Merit(eloisa, eloisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The gardener bless the chrissy. The gardener is antiguan. The gardener is nipponese. The gardener arrive the chrissy. The gardener loosen the chrissy. The stacy bless the chrissy. The stacy arrive the chrissy. The annabela bless the gardener. The annabela bless the stacy. The annabela bless the chrissy. The annabela is antiguan. The annabela arrive the stacy. The annabela loosen the stacy. The chrissy arrive the gardener. The chrissy arrive the annabela. The chrissy loosen the gardener. If something arrive the gardener then it arrive the annabela. If something is greased then it arrive the chrissy. If the chrissy loosen the gardener then the chrissy arrive the gardener. If the gardener is revolved and the gardener loosen the chrissy then the chrissy arrive the stacy. If something is nipponese and it loosen the annabela then it arrive the chrissy. If something arrive the chrissy then it loosen the annabela. If something arrive the gardener then it is greased. If something loosen the chrissy then it loosen the stacy. The chrissy bless the stacy.", "logic": "\nBless(gardener, chrissy)\nAntiguan(gardener)\nNipponese(gardener)\nArrive(gardener, chrissy)\nLoosen(gardener, chrissy)\nBless(stacy, chrissy)\nArrive(stacy, chrissy)\nBless(annabela, gardener)\nBless(annabela, stacy)\nBless(annabela, chrissy)\nAntiguan(annabela)\nArrive(annabela, stacy)\nLoosen(annabela, stacy)\nArrive(chrissy, gardener)\nArrive(chrissy, annabela)\nLoosen(chrissy, gardener)\nforall x (Arrive(x, gardener) -> Arrive(x, annabela))\nforall x (Greased(x) -> Arrive(x, chrissy))\nLoosen(chrissy, gardener) -> Arrive(chrissy, gardener)\nRevolved(gardener) and Loosen(gardener, chrissy) -> Arrive(chrissy, stacy)\nforall x (Nipponese(x) and Loosen(x, annabela) -> Arrive(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Arrive(x, chrissy) -> Loosen(x, annabela))\nforall x (Arrive(x, gardener) -> Greased(x))\nforall x (Loosen(x, chrissy) -> Loosen(x, stacy))\n\nBless(chrissy, stacy)\n\nBless(chrissy, stacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The rosemarie swash the ladonna. The rosemarie is chaotic. The rosemarie is honorific. The rosemarie broadcast the ladonna. The rosemarie misconduct the ladonna. The townie swash the ladonna. The townie broadcast the ladonna. The verene swash the rosemarie. The verene swash the townie. The verene swash the ladonna. The verene is chaotic. The verene broadcast the townie. The verene misconduct the townie. The ladonna broadcast the rosemarie. The ladonna broadcast the verene. The ladonna misconduct the rosemarie. If something broadcast the rosemarie then it broadcast the verene. If something is discreet then it broadcast the ladonna. If the ladonna misconduct the rosemarie then the ladonna broadcast the rosemarie. If the rosemarie is impromptu and the rosemarie misconduct the ladonna then the ladonna broadcast the townie. If something is honorific and it misconduct the verene then it broadcast the ladonna. If something broadcast the ladonna then it misconduct the verene. If something broadcast the rosemarie then it is discreet. If something misconduct the ladonna then it misconduct the townie. The verene does not chase the verene.", "logic": "\nSwash(rosemarie, ladonna)\nChaotic(rosemarie)\nHonorific(rosemarie)\nBroadcast(rosemarie, ladonna)\nMisconduct(rosemarie, ladonna)\nSwash(townie, ladonna)\nBroadcast(townie, ladonna)\nSwash(verene, rosemarie)\nSwash(verene, townie)\nSwash(verene, ladonna)\nChaotic(verene)\nBroadcast(verene, townie)\nMisconduct(verene, townie)\nBroadcast(ladonna, rosemarie)\nBroadcast(ladonna, verene)\nMisconduct(ladonna, rosemarie)\nforall x (Broadcast(x, rosemarie) -> Broadcast(x, verene))\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Broadcast(x, ladonna))\nMisconduct(ladonna, rosemarie) -> Broadcast(ladonna, rosemarie)\nImpromptu(rosemarie) and Misconduct(rosemarie, ladonna) -> Broadcast(ladonna, townie)\nforall x (Honorific(x) and Misconduct(x, verene) -> Broadcast(x, ladonna))\nforall x (Broadcast(x, ladonna) -> Misconduct(x, verene))\nforall x (Broadcast(x, rosemarie) -> Discreet(x))\nforall x (Misconduct(x, ladonna) -> Misconduct(x, townie))\n\nnot Swash(verene, verene)\n\nnot Swash(verene, verene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The sandi entwine the wileen. The sandi is monoatomic. The sandi is utilized. The sandi deplume the wileen. The sandi halt the wileen. The beverlie entwine the wileen. The beverlie deplume the wileen. The delia entwine the sandi. The delia entwine the beverlie. The delia entwine the wileen. The delia is monoatomic. The delia deplume the beverlie. The delia halt the beverlie. The wileen deplume the sandi. The wileen deplume the delia. The wileen halt the sandi. If something deplume the sandi then it deplume the delia. If something is bearable then it deplume the wileen. If the wileen halt the sandi then the wileen deplume the sandi. If the sandi is corneal and the sandi halt the wileen then the wileen deplume the beverlie. If something is utilized and it halt the delia then it deplume the wileen. If something deplume the wileen then it halt the delia. If something deplume the sandi then it is bearable. If something halt the wileen then it halt the beverlie. The wileen is monoatomic.", "logic": "\nEntwine(sandi, wileen)\nMonoatomic(sandi)\nUtilized(sandi)\nDeplume(sandi, wileen)\nHalt(sandi, wileen)\nEntwine(beverlie, wileen)\nDeplume(beverlie, wileen)\nEntwine(delia, sandi)\nEntwine(delia, beverlie)\nEntwine(delia, wileen)\nMonoatomic(delia)\nDeplume(delia, beverlie)\nHalt(delia, beverlie)\nDeplume(wileen, sandi)\nDeplume(wileen, delia)\nHalt(wileen, sandi)\nforall x (Deplume(x, sandi) -> Deplume(x, delia))\nforall x (Bearable(x) -> Deplume(x, wileen))\nHalt(wileen, sandi) -> Deplume(wileen, sandi)\nCorneal(sandi) and Halt(sandi, wileen) -> Deplume(wileen, beverlie)\nforall x (Utilized(x) and Halt(x, delia) -> Deplume(x, wileen))\nforall x (Deplume(x, wileen) -> Halt(x, delia))\nforall x (Deplume(x, sandi) -> Bearable(x))\nforall x (Halt(x, wileen) -> Halt(x, beverlie))\n\nMonoatomic(wileen)\n\nMonoatomic(wileen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Coriss is educative. Coriss is overlooked. Gladis is not unrested. Gladis is sorry. Gladis is sicilian. Gladis is codified. Gladis is educative. White, protozoan things are educative. All protozoan things are sorry. Furry, sicilian things are protozoan. Quiet, educative things are protozoan. White things are codified. If Coriss is educative and Coriss is sorry then Coriss is overlooked. All codified things are sicilian. If Coriss is codified and Coriss is overlooked then Coriss is protozoan. Gladis is sicilian.", "logic": "\nEducative(coriss)\nOverlooked(coriss)\nnot Unrested(gladis)\nSorry(gladis)\nSicilian(gladis)\nCodified(gladis)\nEducative(gladis)\nforall x (Overlooked(x) and Protozoan(x) -> Educative(x))\nforall x (Protozoan(x) -> Sorry(x))\nforall x (Unrested(x) and Sicilian(x) -> Protozoan(x))\nforall x (Sicilian(x) and Educative(x) -> Protozoan(x))\nforall x (Overlooked(x) -> Codified(x))\nEducative(coriss) and Sorry(coriss) -> Overlooked(coriss)\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Sicilian(x))\nCodified(coriss) and Overlooked(coriss) -> Protozoan(coriss)\n\nSicilian(gladis)\n\ntherefore Sicilian(gladis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Cornelle is purposive. Cornelle is intriguing. Maryanna is not digressive. Maryanna is keeled. Maryanna is median. Maryanna is civilian. Maryanna is purposive. White, unusual things are purposive. All unusual things are keeled. Furry, median things are unusual. Quiet, purposive things are unusual. White things are civilian. If Cornelle is purposive and Cornelle is keeled then Cornelle is intriguing. All civilian things are median. If Cornelle is civilian and Cornelle is intriguing then Cornelle is unusual. Maryanna is not keeled.", "logic": "\nPurposive(cornelle)\nIntriguing(cornelle)\nnot Digressive(maryanna)\nKeeled(maryanna)\nMedian(maryanna)\nCivilian(maryanna)\nPurposive(maryanna)\nforall x (Intriguing(x) and Unusual(x) -> Purposive(x))\nforall x (Unusual(x) -> Keeled(x))\nforall x (Digressive(x) and Median(x) -> Unusual(x))\nforall x (Median(x) and Purposive(x) -> Unusual(x))\nforall x (Intriguing(x) -> Civilian(x))\nPurposive(cornelle) and Keeled(cornelle) -> Intriguing(cornelle)\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Median(x))\nCivilian(cornelle) and Intriguing(cornelle) -> Unusual(cornelle)\n\nnot Keeled(maryanna)\n\ntherefore Keeled(maryanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Ruthie is tagged. Ruthie is endozoic. Alyse is not defiant. Alyse is geocentric. Alyse is ungroomed. Alyse is smelling. Alyse is tagged. White, viviparous things are tagged. All viviparous things are geocentric. Furry, ungroomed things are viviparous. Quiet, tagged things are viviparous. White things are smelling. If Ruthie is tagged and Ruthie is geocentric then Ruthie is endozoic. All smelling things are ungroomed. If Ruthie is smelling and Ruthie is endozoic then Ruthie is viviparous. Alyse is viviparous.", "logic": "\nTagged(ruthie)\nEndozoic(ruthie)\nnot Defiant(alyse)\nGeocentric(alyse)\nUngroomed(alyse)\nSmelling(alyse)\nTagged(alyse)\nforall x (Endozoic(x) and Viviparous(x) -> Tagged(x))\nforall x (Viviparous(x) -> Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Defiant(x) and Ungroomed(x) -> Viviparous(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) and Tagged(x) -> Viviparous(x))\nforall x (Endozoic(x) -> Smelling(x))\nTagged(ruthie) and Geocentric(ruthie) -> Endozoic(ruthie)\nforall x (Smelling(x) -> Ungroomed(x))\nSmelling(ruthie) and Endozoic(ruthie) -> Viviparous(ruthie)\n\nViviparous(alyse)\n\nUngroomed(alyse) and Tagged(alyse) and forall x (Ungroomed(x) and Tagged(x) -> Viviparous(x)) -> therefore Viviparous(alyse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Nonna is callow. Nonna is headless. Jacinthe is not enervating. Jacinthe is twisting. Jacinthe is worthy. Jacinthe is garmented. Jacinthe is callow. White, inclement things are callow. All inclement things are twisting. Furry, worthy things are inclement. Quiet, callow things are inclement. White things are garmented. If Nonna is callow and Nonna is twisting then Nonna is headless. All garmented things are worthy. If Nonna is garmented and Nonna is headless then Nonna is inclement. Jacinthe is not inclement.", "logic": "\nCallow(nonna)\nHeadless(nonna)\nnot Enervating(jacinthe)\nTwisting(jacinthe)\nWorthy(jacinthe)\nGarmented(jacinthe)\nCallow(jacinthe)\nforall x (Headless(x) and Inclement(x) -> Callow(x))\nforall x (Inclement(x) -> Twisting(x))\nforall x (Enervating(x) and Worthy(x) -> Inclement(x))\nforall x (Worthy(x) and Callow(x) -> Inclement(x))\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Garmented(x))\nCallow(nonna) and Twisting(nonna) -> Headless(nonna)\nforall x (Garmented(x) -> Worthy(x))\nGarmented(nonna) and Headless(nonna) -> Inclement(nonna)\n\nnot Inclement(jacinthe)\n\nWorthy(jacinthe) and Callow(jacinthe) and forall x (Worthy(x) and Callow(x) -> Inclement(x)) -> therefore Inclement(jacinthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Basil is smitten. Basil is shoeless. Con is not musty. Con is profane. Con is bellyless. Con is squabby. Con is smitten. White, digitate things are smitten. All digitate things are profane. Furry, bellyless things are digitate. Quiet, smitten things are digitate. White things are squabby. If Basil is smitten and Basil is profane then Basil is shoeless. All squabby things are bellyless. If Basil is squabby and Basil is shoeless then Basil is digitate. Basil is bellyless.", "logic": "\nSmitten(basil)\nShoeless(basil)\nnot Musty(con)\nProfane(con)\nBellyless(con)\nSquabby(con)\nSmitten(con)\nforall x (Shoeless(x) and Digitate(x) -> Smitten(x))\nforall x (Digitate(x) -> Profane(x))\nforall x (Musty(x) and Bellyless(x) -> Digitate(x))\nforall x (Bellyless(x) and Smitten(x) -> Digitate(x))\nforall x (Shoeless(x) -> Squabby(x))\nSmitten(basil) and Profane(basil) -> Shoeless(basil)\nforall x (Squabby(x) -> Bellyless(x))\nSquabby(basil) and Shoeless(basil) -> Digitate(basil)\n\nBellyless(basil)\n\nShoeless(basil) and forall x (Shoeless(x) -> Squabby(x)) -> therefore Squabby(basil) Squabby(basil) and forall x (Squabby(x) -> Bellyless(x)) -> therefore Bellyless(basil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Shani is expandible. Shani is scorned. Mimi is not chicken. Mimi is lighted. Mimi is salt. Mimi is bulbaceous. Mimi is expandible. White, unreleased things are expandible. All unreleased things are lighted. Furry, salt things are unreleased. Quiet, expandible things are unreleased. White things are bulbaceous. If Shani is expandible and Shani is lighted then Shani is scorned. All bulbaceous things are salt. If Shani is bulbaceous and Shani is scorned then Shani is unreleased. Shani is not unreleased.", "logic": "\nExpandible(shani)\nScorned(shani)\nnot Chicken(mimi)\nLighted(mimi)\nSalt(mimi)\nBulbaceous(mimi)\nExpandible(mimi)\nforall x (Scorned(x) and Unreleased(x) -> Expandible(x))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) -> Lighted(x))\nforall x (Chicken(x) and Salt(x) -> Unreleased(x))\nforall x (Salt(x) and Expandible(x) -> Unreleased(x))\nforall x (Scorned(x) -> Bulbaceous(x))\nExpandible(shani) and Lighted(shani) -> Scorned(shani)\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Salt(x))\nBulbaceous(shani) and Scorned(shani) -> Unreleased(shani)\n\nnot Unreleased(shani)\n\nScorned(shani) and forall x (Scorned(x) -> Bulbaceous(x)) -> therefore Bulbaceous(shani) Bulbaceous(shani) and Scorned(shani) and Bulbaceous(shani) and Scorned(shani) -> Unreleased(shani) -> therefore Unreleased(shani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Darwin is rascally. Darwin is consistent. Kathryn is not unhallowed. Kathryn is detested. Kathryn is resultant. Kathryn is fatherly. Kathryn is rascally. White, saccharine things are rascally. All saccharine things are detested. Furry, resultant things are saccharine. Quiet, rascally things are saccharine. White things are fatherly. If Darwin is rascally and Darwin is detested then Darwin is consistent. All fatherly things are resultant. If Darwin is fatherly and Darwin is consistent then Darwin is saccharine. Darwin is detested.", "logic": "\nRascally(darwin)\nConsistent(darwin)\nnot Unhallowed(kathryn)\nDetested(kathryn)\nResultant(kathryn)\nFatherly(kathryn)\nRascally(kathryn)\nforall x (Consistent(x) and Saccharine(x) -> Rascally(x))\nforall x (Saccharine(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and Resultant(x) -> Saccharine(x))\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Rascally(x) -> Saccharine(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Fatherly(x))\nRascally(darwin) and Detested(darwin) -> Consistent(darwin)\nforall x (Fatherly(x) -> Resultant(x))\nFatherly(darwin) and Consistent(darwin) -> Saccharine(darwin)\n\nDetested(darwin)\n\nConsistent(darwin) and forall x (Consistent(x) -> Fatherly(x)) -> therefore Fatherly(darwin) Fatherly(darwin) and Consistent(darwin) and Fatherly(darwin) and Consistent(darwin) -> Saccharine(darwin) -> therefore Saccharine(darwin) Saccharine(darwin) and forall x (Saccharine(x) -> Detested(x)) -> therefore Detested(darwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Enrica is sweetened. Enrica is kampuchean. Madalyn is not unblushing. Madalyn is blockish. Madalyn is raptorial. Madalyn is anaglyptic. Madalyn is sweetened. White, selfsame things are sweetened. All selfsame things are blockish. Furry, raptorial things are selfsame. Quiet, sweetened things are selfsame. White things are anaglyptic. If Enrica is sweetened and Enrica is blockish then Enrica is kampuchean. All anaglyptic things are raptorial. If Enrica is anaglyptic and Enrica is kampuchean then Enrica is selfsame. Enrica is not blockish.", "logic": "\nSweetened(enrica)\nKampuchean(enrica)\nnot Unblushing(madalyn)\nBlockish(madalyn)\nRaptorial(madalyn)\nAnaglyptic(madalyn)\nSweetened(madalyn)\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) and Selfsame(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nforall x (Selfsame(x) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and Raptorial(x) -> Selfsame(x))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) and Sweetened(x) -> Selfsame(x))\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Anaglyptic(x))\nSweetened(enrica) and Blockish(enrica) -> Kampuchean(enrica)\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nAnaglyptic(enrica) and Kampuchean(enrica) -> Selfsame(enrica)\n\nnot Blockish(enrica)\n\nKampuchean(enrica) and forall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Anaglyptic(x)) -> therefore Anaglyptic(enrica) Anaglyptic(enrica) and Kampuchean(enrica) and Anaglyptic(enrica) and Kampuchean(enrica) -> Selfsame(enrica) -> therefore Selfsame(enrica) Selfsame(enrica) and forall x (Selfsame(x) -> Blockish(x)) -> therefore Blockish(enrica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Rafaelita is implicit. Rafaelita is waterborne. Antoni is not unsated. Antoni is coital. Antoni is postmodern. Antoni is neuter. Antoni is implicit. White, indecent things are implicit. All indecent things are coital. Furry, postmodern things are indecent. Quiet, implicit things are indecent. White things are neuter. If Rafaelita is implicit and Rafaelita is coital then Rafaelita is waterborne. All neuter things are postmodern. If Rafaelita is neuter and Rafaelita is waterborne then Rafaelita is indecent. Antoni is not waterborne.", "logic": "\nImplicit(rafaelita)\nWaterborne(rafaelita)\nnot Unsated(antoni)\nCoital(antoni)\nPostmodern(antoni)\nNeuter(antoni)\nImplicit(antoni)\nforall x (Waterborne(x) and Indecent(x) -> Implicit(x))\nforall x (Indecent(x) -> Coital(x))\nforall x (Unsated(x) and Postmodern(x) -> Indecent(x))\nforall x (Postmodern(x) and Implicit(x) -> Indecent(x))\nforall x (Waterborne(x) -> Neuter(x))\nImplicit(rafaelita) and Coital(rafaelita) -> Waterborne(rafaelita)\nforall x (Neuter(x) -> Postmodern(x))\nNeuter(rafaelita) and Waterborne(rafaelita) -> Indecent(rafaelita)\n\nnot Waterborne(antoni)\n\nnot Waterborne(antoni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Allsun is fungible. Allsun is geothermic. Cobb is not cunning. Cobb is sensed. Cobb is bewildered. Cobb is hated. Cobb is fungible. White, unended things are fungible. All unended things are sensed. Furry, bewildered things are unended. Quiet, fungible things are unended. White things are hated. If Allsun is fungible and Allsun is sensed then Allsun is geothermic. All hated things are bewildered. If Allsun is hated and Allsun is geothermic then Allsun is unended. Allsun is cunning.", "logic": "\nFungible(allsun)\nGeothermic(allsun)\nnot Cunning(cobb)\nSensed(cobb)\nBewildered(cobb)\nHated(cobb)\nFungible(cobb)\nforall x (Geothermic(x) and Unended(x) -> Fungible(x))\nforall x (Unended(x) -> Sensed(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) and Bewildered(x) -> Unended(x))\nforall x (Bewildered(x) and Fungible(x) -> Unended(x))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Hated(x))\nFungible(allsun) and Sensed(allsun) -> Geothermic(allsun)\nforall x (Hated(x) -> Bewildered(x))\nHated(allsun) and Geothermic(allsun) -> Unended(allsun)\n\nCunning(allsun)\n\nCunning(allsun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Arabelle is pawky. Adara is blanched. If someone is habitable then they are clownish. If someone is advancing and not pawky then they are clownish. If someone is syllabic then they are not clownish. All habitable people are clownish. If someone is blanched and comburant then they are habitable. All syllabic people are not habitable. Green people are habitable. All clownish people are not advancing. Arabelle is pawky.", "logic": "\nPawky(arabelle)\nBlanched(adara)\nforall x (Habitable(x) -> Clownish(x))\nforall x (Advancing(x) and not Pawky(x) -> Clownish(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> not Clownish(x))\nforall x (Habitable(x) -> Clownish(x))\nforall x (Blanched(x) and Comburant(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> not Habitable(x))\nforall x (Pawky(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Clownish(x) -> not Advancing(x))\n\nPawky(arabelle)\n\ntherefore Pawky(arabelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Suzi is level. Torr is funerary. If someone is caring then they are dreadful. If someone is nipping and not level then they are dreadful. If someone is beseeching then they are not dreadful. All caring people are dreadful. If someone is funerary and humped then they are caring. All beseeching people are not caring. Green people are caring. All dreadful people are not nipping. Torr is not funerary.", "logic": "\nLevel(suzi)\nFunerary(torr)\nforall x (Caring(x) -> Dreadful(x))\nforall x (Nipping(x) and not Level(x) -> Dreadful(x))\nforall x (Beseeching(x) -> not Dreadful(x))\nforall x (Caring(x) -> Dreadful(x))\nforall x (Funerary(x) and Humped(x) -> Caring(x))\nforall x (Beseeching(x) -> not Caring(x))\nforall x (Level(x) -> Caring(x))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> not Nipping(x))\n\nnot Funerary(torr)\n\ntherefore Funerary(torr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Eveline is illegal. Tracy is shadowed. If someone is forgiving then they are known. If someone is tropic and not illegal then they are known. If someone is uniovulate then they are not known. All forgiving people are known. If someone is shadowed and impendent then they are forgiving. All uniovulate people are not forgiving. Green people are forgiving. All known people are not tropic. Eveline is forgiving.", "logic": "\nIllegal(eveline)\nShadowed(tracy)\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) and not Illegal(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> not Known(x))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Shadowed(x) and Impendent(x) -> Forgiving(x))\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> not Forgiving(x))\nforall x (Illegal(x) -> Forgiving(x))\nforall x (Known(x) -> not Tropic(x))\n\nForgiving(eveline)\n\nIllegal(eveline) and forall x (Illegal(x) -> Forgiving(x)) -> therefore Forgiving(eveline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Francene is spendable. Carmine is cocky. If someone is laughable then they are shrewish. If someone is gathered and not spendable then they are shrewish. If someone is evidential then they are not shrewish. All laughable people are shrewish. If someone is cocky and murderous then they are laughable. All evidential people are not laughable. Green people are laughable. All shrewish people are not gathered. Francene is not laughable.", "logic": "\nSpendable(francene)\nCocky(carmine)\nforall x (Laughable(x) -> Shrewish(x))\nforall x (Gathered(x) and not Spendable(x) -> Shrewish(x))\nforall x (Evidential(x) -> not Shrewish(x))\nforall x (Laughable(x) -> Shrewish(x))\nforall x (Cocky(x) and Murderous(x) -> Laughable(x))\nforall x (Evidential(x) -> not Laughable(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Laughable(x))\nforall x (Shrewish(x) -> not Gathered(x))\n\nnot Laughable(francene)\n\nSpendable(francene) and forall x (Spendable(x) -> Laughable(x)) -> therefore Laughable(francene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Kora is variegated. Johnathon is shirty. If someone is periodical then they are aguish. If someone is rapturous and not variegated then they are aguish. If someone is untapped then they are not aguish. All periodical people are aguish. If someone is shirty and tailored then they are periodical. All untapped people are not periodical. Green people are periodical. All aguish people are not rapturous. Kora is aguish.", "logic": "\nVariegated(kora)\nShirty(johnathon)\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Rapturous(x) and not Variegated(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> not Aguish(x))\nforall x (Periodical(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Shirty(x) and Tailored(x) -> Periodical(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> not Periodical(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) -> Periodical(x))\nforall x (Aguish(x) -> not Rapturous(x))\n\nAguish(kora)\n\nVariegated(kora) and forall x (Variegated(x) -> Periodical(x)) -> therefore Periodical(kora) Periodical(kora) and forall x (Periodical(x) -> Aguish(x)) -> therefore Aguish(kora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Dwayne is gnarly. Charley is sexed. If someone is looking then they are blockading. If someone is droopy and not gnarly then they are blockading. If someone is flabby then they are not blockading. All looking people are blockading. If someone is sexed and comose then they are looking. All flabby people are not looking. Green people are looking. All blockading people are not droopy. Dwayne is not blockading.", "logic": "\nGnarly(dwayne)\nSexed(charley)\nforall x (Looking(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Droopy(x) and not Gnarly(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Flabby(x) -> not Blockading(x))\nforall x (Looking(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Sexed(x) and Comose(x) -> Looking(x))\nforall x (Flabby(x) -> not Looking(x))\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Looking(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) -> not Droopy(x))\n\nnot Blockading(dwayne)\n\nGnarly(dwayne) and forall x (Gnarly(x) -> Looking(x)) -> therefore Looking(dwayne) Looking(dwayne) and forall x (Looking(x) -> Blockading(x)) -> therefore Blockading(dwayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Zita is newsworthy. Clay is following. If someone is regressive then they are teeny. If someone is casebook and not newsworthy then they are teeny. If someone is blank then they are not teeny. All regressive people are teeny. If someone is following and special then they are regressive. All blank people are not regressive. Green people are regressive. All teeny people are not casebook. Zita is not casebook.", "logic": "\nNewsworthy(zita)\nFollowing(clay)\nforall x (Regressive(x) -> Teeny(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) and not Newsworthy(x) -> Teeny(x))\nforall x (Blank(x) -> not Teeny(x))\nforall x (Regressive(x) -> Teeny(x))\nforall x (Following(x) and Special(x) -> Regressive(x))\nforall x (Blank(x) -> not Regressive(x))\nforall x (Newsworthy(x) -> Regressive(x))\nforall x (Teeny(x) -> not Casebook(x))\n\nnot Casebook(zita)\n\nNewsworthy(zita) and forall x (Newsworthy(x) -> Regressive(x)) -> therefore Regressive(zita) Regressive(zita) and forall x (Regressive(x) -> Teeny(x)) -> therefore Teeny(zita) Teeny(zita) and forall x (Teeny(x) -> not Casebook(x)) -> therefore not Casebook(zita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Venkat is scalene. Bobbi is initiative. If someone is assailable then they are bicyclic. If someone is unlipped and not scalene then they are bicyclic. If someone is chantlike then they are not bicyclic. All assailable people are bicyclic. If someone is initiative and antitank then they are assailable. All chantlike people are not assailable. Green people are assailable. All bicyclic people are not unlipped. Venkat is unlipped.", "logic": "\nScalene(venkat)\nInitiative(bobbi)\nforall x (Assailable(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Unlipped(x) and not Scalene(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> not Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Assailable(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Initiative(x) and Antitank(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> not Assailable(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) -> not Unlipped(x))\n\nUnlipped(venkat)\n\nScalene(venkat) and forall x (Scalene(x) -> Assailable(x)) -> therefore Assailable(venkat) Assailable(venkat) and forall x (Assailable(x) -> Bicyclic(x)) -> therefore Bicyclic(venkat) Bicyclic(venkat) and forall x (Bicyclic(x) -> not Unlipped(x)) -> therefore not Unlipped(venkat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Juliann is tasseled. Brodie is campestral. If someone is calculable then they are desiccate. If someone is calcitic and not tasseled then they are desiccate. If someone is epileptic then they are not desiccate. All calculable people are desiccate. If someone is campestral and convenient then they are calculable. All epileptic people are not calculable. Green people are calculable. All desiccate people are not calcitic. Brodie is not calculable.", "logic": "\nTasseled(juliann)\nCampestral(brodie)\nforall x (Calculable(x) -> Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Calcitic(x) and not Tasseled(x) -> Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Epileptic(x) -> not Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Calculable(x) -> Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Campestral(x) and Convenient(x) -> Calculable(x))\nforall x (Epileptic(x) -> not Calculable(x))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> Calculable(x))\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> not Calcitic(x))\n\nnot Calculable(brodie)\n\nforall x (Campestral(x) and Convenient(x) -> Calculable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Ofilia is coccygeal. Damara is gruff. If someone is corneous then they are meshuga. If someone is romanian and not coccygeal then they are meshuga. If someone is inboard then they are not meshuga. All corneous people are meshuga. If someone is gruff and visceral then they are corneous. All inboard people are not corneous. Green people are corneous. All meshuga people are not romanian. Damara is meshuga.", "logic": "\nCoccygeal(ofilia)\nGruff(damara)\nforall x (Corneous(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Romanian(x) and not Coccygeal(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> not Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Corneous(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Gruff(x) and Visceral(x) -> Corneous(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> not Corneous(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) -> Corneous(x))\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> not Romanian(x))\n\nMeshuga(damara)\n\nforall x (Corneous(x) -> Meshuga(x)) <- forall x (Gruff(x) and Visceral(x) -> Corneous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Shannen is gilbertian. Hakeem is proximate. If someone is mozartean then they are colonised. If someone is maximal and not gilbertian then they are colonised. If someone is lunisolar then they are not colonised. All mozartean people are colonised. If someone is proximate and unfastened then they are mozartean. All lunisolar people are not mozartean. Green people are mozartean. All colonised people are not maximal. Hakeem is not maximal.", "logic": "\nGilbertian(shannen)\nProximate(hakeem)\nforall x (Mozartean(x) -> Colonised(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) and not Gilbertian(x) -> Colonised(x))\nforall x (Lunisolar(x) -> not Colonised(x))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) -> Colonised(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) and Unfastened(x) -> Mozartean(x))\nforall x (Lunisolar(x) -> not Mozartean(x))\nforall x (Gilbertian(x) -> Mozartean(x))\nforall x (Colonised(x) -> not Maximal(x))\n\nnot Maximal(hakeem)\n\nnot Maximal(hakeem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Simona is seafaring. Hans is slicked. If someone is proximate then they are made. If someone is isthmian and not seafaring then they are made. If someone is ferocious then they are not made. All proximate people are made. If someone is slicked and distal then they are proximate. All ferocious people are not proximate. Green people are proximate. All made people are not isthmian. Simona is ferocious.", "logic": "\nSeafaring(simona)\nSlicked(hans)\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Made(x))\nforall x (Isthmian(x) and not Seafaring(x) -> Made(x))\nforall x (Ferocious(x) -> not Made(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Made(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) and Distal(x) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Ferocious(x) -> not Proximate(x))\nforall x (Seafaring(x) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Made(x) -> not Isthmian(x))\n\nFerocious(simona)\n\nFerocious(simona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Terrence is alveolar. Selby is monecious. If someone is lamented then they are handless. If someone is otiose and not alveolar then they are handless. If someone is chlamydial then they are not handless. All lamented people are handless. If someone is monecious and dispensed then they are lamented. All chlamydial people are not lamented. Green people are lamented. All handless people are not otiose. Terrence is not dispensed.", "logic": "\nAlveolar(terrence)\nMonecious(selby)\nforall x (Lamented(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Otiose(x) and not Alveolar(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) -> not Handless(x))\nforall x (Lamented(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Monecious(x) and Dispensed(x) -> Lamented(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) -> not Lamented(x))\nforall x (Alveolar(x) -> Lamented(x))\nforall x (Handless(x) -> not Otiose(x))\n\nnot Dispensed(terrence)\n\nnot Dispensed(terrence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Annabel is cypriote. Sim is fickle. If someone is basaltic then they are ashen. If someone is ignitible and not cypriote then they are ashen. If someone is bismuthic then they are not ashen. All basaltic people are ashen. If someone is fickle and vermicular then they are basaltic. All bismuthic people are not basaltic. Green people are basaltic. All ashen people are not ignitible. Sim is vermicular.", "logic": "\nCypriote(annabel)\nFickle(sim)\nforall x (Basaltic(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and not Cypriote(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> not Ashen(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Fickle(x) and Vermicular(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> not Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> not Ignitible(x))\n\nVermicular(sim)\n\nVermicular(sim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Cele is fouled. Arvie is worn. If someone is blooming then they are humane. If someone is canted and not fouled then they are humane. If someone is agape then they are not humane. All blooming people are humane. If someone is worn and susurrous then they are blooming. All agape people are not blooming. Green people are blooming. All humane people are not canted. Cele is not worn.", "logic": "\nFouled(cele)\nWorn(arvie)\nforall x (Blooming(x) -> Humane(x))\nforall x (Canted(x) and not Fouled(x) -> Humane(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> not Humane(x))\nforall x (Blooming(x) -> Humane(x))\nforall x (Worn(x) and Susurrous(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> not Blooming(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) -> not Canted(x))\n\nnot Worn(cele)\n\nnot Worn(cele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Emelia is greenhouse. Dore is ramose. If someone is roughshod then they are omissive. If someone is arboriform and not greenhouse then they are omissive. If someone is sanious then they are not omissive. All roughshod people are omissive. If someone is ramose and hassidic then they are roughshod. All sanious people are not roughshod. Green people are roughshod. All omissive people are not arboriform. Dore is sanious.", "logic": "\nGreenhouse(emelia)\nRamose(dore)\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Arboriform(x) and not Greenhouse(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Sanious(x) -> not Omissive(x))\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Ramose(x) and Hassidic(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Sanious(x) -> not Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Omissive(x) -> not Arboriform(x))\n\nSanious(dore)\n\nSanious(dore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Millicent is solved. Rodina is icky. Sabine is broiled. Rocky is solved. Green things are tasteless. All pleural, solved things are sunrise. Big things are icky. If something is pleural then it is solved. Nice, anurous things are icky. Nice things are anurous. Sabine is broiled.", "logic": "\nSolved(millicent)\nIcky(rodina)\nBroiled(sabine)\nSolved(rocky)\nforall x (Icky(x) -> Tasteless(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) and Solved(x) -> Sunrise(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Broiled(x) and Anurous(x) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Broiled(x) -> Anurous(x))\n\nBroiled(sabine)\n\ntherefore Broiled(sabine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Diena is pert. Kimmo is swept. Katti is cylindric. Jany is pert. Green things are fifty. All fourteen, pert things are nonresiny. Big things are swept. If something is fourteen then it is pert. Nice, abysmal things are swept. Nice things are abysmal. Jany is not pert.", "logic": "\nPert(diena)\nSwept(kimmo)\nCylindric(katti)\nPert(jany)\nforall x (Swept(x) -> Fifty(x))\nforall x (Fourteen(x) and Pert(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) -> Swept(x))\nforall x (Fourteen(x) -> Pert(x))\nforall x (Cylindric(x) and Abysmal(x) -> Swept(x))\nforall x (Cylindric(x) -> Abysmal(x))\n\nnot Pert(jany)\n\ntherefore Pert(jany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Piggy is calloused. Luana is unclipped. Blakeley is nascent. Bambi is calloused. Green things are nucleate. All weblike, calloused things are unprepared. Big things are unclipped. If something is weblike then it is calloused. Nice, peritoneal things are unclipped. Nice things are peritoneal. Blakeley is peritoneal.", "logic": "\nCalloused(piggy)\nUnclipped(luana)\nNascent(blakeley)\nCalloused(bambi)\nforall x (Unclipped(x) -> Nucleate(x))\nforall x (Weblike(x) and Calloused(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Unclipped(x))\nforall x (Weblike(x) -> Calloused(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and Peritoneal(x) -> Unclipped(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> Peritoneal(x))\n\nPeritoneal(blakeley)\n\nNascent(blakeley) and forall x (Nascent(x) -> Peritoneal(x)) -> therefore Peritoneal(blakeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Mirabelle is drained. Ragnar is colored. Zea is saprozoic. Catharine is drained. Green things are detergent. All unwilled, drained things are acidotic. Big things are colored. If something is unwilled then it is drained. Nice, talismanic things are colored. Nice things are talismanic. Ragnar is not detergent.", "logic": "\nDrained(mirabelle)\nColored(ragnar)\nSaprozoic(zea)\nDrained(catharine)\nforall x (Colored(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and Drained(x) -> Acidotic(x))\nforall x (Acidotic(x) -> Colored(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) -> Drained(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) and Talismanic(x) -> Colored(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) -> Talismanic(x))\n\nnot Detergent(ragnar)\n\nColored(ragnar) and forall x (Colored(x) -> Detergent(x)) -> therefore Detergent(ragnar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Wash is stifled. Jerrine is lentiform. Keenan is every. Suellen is stifled. Green things are softening. All cymose, stifled things are footsore. Big things are lentiform. If something is cymose then it is stifled. Nice, chinless things are lentiform. Nice things are chinless. Keenan is lentiform.", "logic": "\nStifled(wash)\nLentiform(jerrine)\nEvery(keenan)\nStifled(suellen)\nforall x (Lentiform(x) -> Softening(x))\nforall x (Cymose(x) and Stifled(x) -> Footsore(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) -> Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Cymose(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Every(x) and Chinless(x) -> Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Every(x) -> Chinless(x))\n\nLentiform(keenan)\n\nEvery(keenan) and forall x (Every(x) -> Chinless(x)) -> therefore Chinless(keenan) Every(keenan) and Chinless(keenan) and forall x (Every(x) and Chinless(x) -> Lentiform(x)) -> therefore Lentiform(keenan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Zack is behavioral. Karlotta is quirky. Oralla is hesitant. Northrop is behavioral. Green things are molecular. All unpainted, behavioral things are braided. Big things are quirky. If something is unpainted then it is behavioral. Nice, lxxxi things are quirky. Nice things are lxxxi. Oralla is not quirky.", "logic": "\nBehavioral(zack)\nQuirky(karlotta)\nHesitant(oralla)\nBehavioral(northrop)\nforall x (Quirky(x) -> Molecular(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Behavioral(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Braided(x) -> Quirky(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Lxxxi(x) -> Quirky(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) -> Lxxxi(x))\n\nnot Quirky(oralla)\n\nHesitant(oralla) and forall x (Hesitant(x) -> Lxxxi(x)) -> therefore Lxxxi(oralla) Hesitant(oralla) and Lxxxi(oralla) and forall x (Hesitant(x) and Lxxxi(x) -> Quirky(x)) -> therefore Quirky(oralla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Harmonie is graphical. Leena is amateur. Lib is regimental. Jeannette is graphical. Green things are unmarred. All demure, graphical things are stodgy. Big things are amateur. If something is demure then it is graphical. Nice, inflatable things are amateur. Nice things are inflatable. Lib is unmarred.", "logic": "\nGraphical(harmonie)\nAmateur(leena)\nRegimental(lib)\nGraphical(jeannette)\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Unmarred(x))\nforall x (Demure(x) and Graphical(x) -> Stodgy(x))\nforall x (Stodgy(x) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Graphical(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) and Inflatable(x) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) -> Inflatable(x))\n\nUnmarred(lib)\n\nRegimental(lib) and forall x (Regimental(x) -> Inflatable(x)) -> therefore Inflatable(lib) Regimental(lib) and Inflatable(lib) and forall x (Regimental(x) and Inflatable(x) -> Amateur(x)) -> therefore Amateur(lib) Amateur(lib) and forall x (Amateur(x) -> Unmarred(x)) -> therefore Unmarred(lib)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Raymond is electronic. Tomiko is untracked. Kati is peccable. Van is electronic. Green things are unbending. All crabwise, electronic things are ninety. Big things are untracked. If something is crabwise then it is electronic. Nice, salient things are untracked. Nice things are salient. Kati is not unbending.", "logic": "\nElectronic(raymond)\nUntracked(tomiko)\nPeccable(kati)\nElectronic(van)\nforall x (Untracked(x) -> Unbending(x))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) and Electronic(x) -> Ninety(x))\nforall x (Ninety(x) -> Untracked(x))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Peccable(x) and Salient(x) -> Untracked(x))\nforall x (Peccable(x) -> Salient(x))\n\nnot Unbending(kati)\n\nPeccable(kati) and forall x (Peccable(x) -> Salient(x)) -> therefore Salient(kati) Peccable(kati) and Salient(kati) and forall x (Peccable(x) and Salient(x) -> Untracked(x)) -> therefore Untracked(kati) Untracked(kati) and forall x (Untracked(x) -> Unbending(x)) -> therefore Unbending(kati)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Daphne is eventful. Leorah is illegible. Zaneta is stingless. Brent is eventful. Green things are unveiled. All brachiate, eventful things are overheated. Big things are illegible. If something is brachiate then it is eventful. Nice, salientian things are illegible. Nice things are salientian. Brent is not overheated.", "logic": "\nEventful(daphne)\nIllegible(leorah)\nStingless(zaneta)\nEventful(brent)\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> Unveiled(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and Eventful(x) -> Overheated(x))\nforall x (Overheated(x) -> Illegible(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) -> Eventful(x))\nforall x (Stingless(x) and Salientian(x) -> Illegible(x))\nforall x (Stingless(x) -> Salientian(x))\n\nnot Overheated(brent)\n\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and Eventful(x) -> Overheated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Laureen is pedate. Hunt is deadly. Lena is tinselly. Haskel is pedate. Green things are niffy. All meteoric, pedate things are anterior. Big things are deadly. If something is meteoric then it is pedate. Nice, aforesaid things are deadly. Nice things are aforesaid. Haskel is aforesaid.", "logic": "\nPedate(laureen)\nDeadly(hunt)\nTinselly(lena)\nPedate(haskel)\nforall x (Deadly(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) and Pedate(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Deadly(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) -> Pedate(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) and Aforesaid(x) -> Deadly(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Aforesaid(x))\n\nAforesaid(haskel)\n\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Aforesaid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Anetta is unfitting. Ashlee is adynamic. Austine is plumbable. Amory is unfitting. Green things are empowered. All moresque, unfitting things are fleecy. Big things are adynamic. If something is moresque then it is unfitting. Nice, fulgent things are adynamic. Nice things are fulgent. Ashlee is not fleecy.", "logic": "\nUnfitting(anetta)\nAdynamic(ashlee)\nPlumbable(austine)\nUnfitting(amory)\nforall x (Adynamic(x) -> Empowered(x))\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Unfitting(x) -> Fleecy(x))\nforall x (Fleecy(x) -> Adynamic(x))\nforall x (Moresque(x) -> Unfitting(x))\nforall x (Plumbable(x) and Fulgent(x) -> Adynamic(x))\nforall x (Plumbable(x) -> Fulgent(x))\n\nnot Fleecy(ashlee)\n\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Unfitting(x) -> Fleecy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Sergeant is unilateral. Lyndon is sterling. Bridgett is combustive. Janifer is unilateral. Green things are unseen. All umber, unilateral things are swishy. Big things are sterling. If something is umber then it is unilateral. Nice, censored things are sterling. Nice things are censored. Janifer is sterling.", "logic": "\nUnilateral(sergeant)\nSterling(lyndon)\nCombustive(bridgett)\nUnilateral(janifer)\nforall x (Sterling(x) -> Unseen(x))\nforall x (Umber(x) and Unilateral(x) -> Swishy(x))\nforall x (Swishy(x) -> Sterling(x))\nforall x (Umber(x) -> Unilateral(x))\nforall x (Combustive(x) and Censored(x) -> Sterling(x))\nforall x (Combustive(x) -> Censored(x))\n\nSterling(janifer)\n\nforall x (Swishy(x) -> Sterling(x)) <- forall x (Umber(x) and Unilateral(x) -> Swishy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Darsey is lighted. Kaia is misbegot. Wallache is esteemed. Hartwell is lighted. Green things are heraldic. All unlogical, lighted things are scorned. Big things are misbegot. If something is unlogical then it is lighted. Nice, toed things are misbegot. Nice things are toed. Darsey is not unlogical.", "logic": "\nLighted(darsey)\nMisbegot(kaia)\nEsteemed(wallache)\nLighted(hartwell)\nforall x (Misbegot(x) -> Heraldic(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) and Lighted(x) -> Scorned(x))\nforall x (Scorned(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> Lighted(x))\nforall x (Esteemed(x) and Toed(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Esteemed(x) -> Toed(x))\n\nnot Unlogical(darsey)\n\nnot Unlogical(darsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Grazia is quenched. Ikey is songful. Stacy is hilar. Jobina is quenched. Green things are unskilled. All evasive, quenched things are devoid. Big things are songful. If something is evasive then it is quenched. Nice, evaporated things are songful. Nice things are evaporated. Jobina is hilar.", "logic": "\nQuenched(grazia)\nSongful(ikey)\nHilar(stacy)\nQuenched(jobina)\nforall x (Songful(x) -> Unskilled(x))\nforall x (Evasive(x) and Quenched(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Devoid(x) -> Songful(x))\nforall x (Evasive(x) -> Quenched(x))\nforall x (Hilar(x) and Evaporated(x) -> Songful(x))\nforall x (Hilar(x) -> Evaporated(x))\n\nHilar(jobina)\n\nHilar(jobina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Franni is ruling. Iggy is indusial. Aura is crannied. Leona is ruling. Green things are rumansh. All unavailing, ruling things are futureless. Big things are indusial. If something is unavailing then it is ruling. Nice, calcuttan things are indusial. Nice things are calcuttan. Iggy is not unavailing.", "logic": "\nRuling(franni)\nIndusial(iggy)\nCrannied(aura)\nRuling(leona)\nforall x (Indusial(x) -> Rumansh(x))\nforall x (Unavailing(x) and Ruling(x) -> Futureless(x))\nforall x (Futureless(x) -> Indusial(x))\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Ruling(x))\nforall x (Crannied(x) and Calcuttan(x) -> Indusial(x))\nforall x (Crannied(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\n\nnot Unavailing(iggy)\n\nnot Unavailing(iggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Leola is detractive. Spenser is unromantic. Maryrose is thumping. Barrett is detractive. Green things are improper. All plummy, detractive things are jolted. Big things are unromantic. If something is plummy then it is detractive. Nice, splashed things are unromantic. Nice things are splashed. Spenser is thumping.", "logic": "\nDetractive(leola)\nUnromantic(spenser)\nThumping(maryrose)\nDetractive(barrett)\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Improper(x))\nforall x (Plummy(x) and Detractive(x) -> Jolted(x))\nforall x (Jolted(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> Detractive(x))\nforall x (Thumping(x) and Splashed(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Thumping(x) -> Splashed(x))\n\nThumping(spenser)\n\nThumping(spenser) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Daphna is echoing. Daphna is featured. Dyann is piagetian. Dyann is standpat. Cybelle is retro. Cybelle is accurate. Jeremiah is retro. If something is retro then it is mishnaic. Smart things are standpat. If something is echoing and retro then it is piagetian. Smart things are retro. Red things are featured. If something is featured and standpat then it is mishnaic. All featured, piagetian things are standpat. If something is retro then it is mishnaic. Dyann is standpat.", "logic": "\nEchoing(daphna)\nFeatured(daphna)\nPiagetian(dyann)\nStandpat(dyann)\nRetro(cybelle)\nAccurate(cybelle)\nRetro(jeremiah)\nforall x (Retro(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Echoing(x) and Retro(x) -> Piagetian(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Retro(x))\nforall x (Standpat(x) -> Featured(x))\nforall x (Featured(x) and Standpat(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Featured(x) and Piagetian(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Retro(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\n\nStandpat(dyann)\n\ntherefore Standpat(dyann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Major is russet. Major is mauve. Reggy is micro. Reggy is spare. Minerva is dishonest. Minerva is centered. Josefina is dishonest. If something is dishonest then it is placid. Smart things are spare. If something is russet and dishonest then it is micro. Smart things are dishonest. Red things are mauve. If something is mauve and spare then it is placid. All mauve, micro things are spare. If something is dishonest then it is placid. Major is not mauve.", "logic": "\nRusset(major)\nMauve(major)\nMicro(reggy)\nSpare(reggy)\nDishonest(minerva)\nCentered(minerva)\nDishonest(josefina)\nforall x (Dishonest(x) -> Placid(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) -> Spare(x))\nforall x (Russet(x) and Dishonest(x) -> Micro(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) -> Dishonest(x))\nforall x (Spare(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Spare(x) -> Placid(x))\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Micro(x) -> Spare(x))\nforall x (Dishonest(x) -> Placid(x))\n\nnot Mauve(major)\n\ntherefore Mauve(major)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Thekla is belemnitic. Thekla is bulbed. Lory is outraged. Lory is aglow. Brier is sintered. Brier is evanescent. Daphne is sintered. If something is sintered then it is brinded. Smart things are aglow. If something is belemnitic and sintered then it is outraged. Smart things are sintered. Red things are bulbed. If something is bulbed and aglow then it is brinded. All bulbed, outraged things are aglow. If something is sintered then it is brinded. Brier is brinded.", "logic": "\nBelemnitic(thekla)\nBulbed(thekla)\nOutraged(lory)\nAglow(lory)\nSintered(brier)\nEvanescent(brier)\nSintered(daphne)\nforall x (Sintered(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Aglow(x))\nforall x (Belemnitic(x) and Sintered(x) -> Outraged(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Sintered(x))\nforall x (Aglow(x) -> Bulbed(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) and Aglow(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) and Outraged(x) -> Aglow(x))\nforall x (Sintered(x) -> Brinded(x))\n\nBrinded(brier)\n\nSintered(brier) and forall x (Sintered(x) -> Brinded(x)) -> therefore Brinded(brier)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Hannie is withdrawn. Hannie is unshaved. Imogen is palmatifid. Imogen is trenchant. Eloisa is random. Eloisa is unbiassed. Clint is random. If something is random then it is akimbo. Smart things are trenchant. If something is withdrawn and random then it is palmatifid. Smart things are random. Red things are unshaved. If something is unshaved and trenchant then it is akimbo. All unshaved, palmatifid things are trenchant. If something is random then it is akimbo. Clint is not akimbo.", "logic": "\nWithdrawn(hannie)\nUnshaved(hannie)\nPalmatifid(imogen)\nTrenchant(imogen)\nRandom(eloisa)\nUnbiassed(eloisa)\nRandom(clint)\nforall x (Random(x) -> Akimbo(x))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Trenchant(x))\nforall x (Withdrawn(x) and Random(x) -> Palmatifid(x))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Random(x))\nforall x (Trenchant(x) -> Unshaved(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Akimbo(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) and Palmatifid(x) -> Trenchant(x))\nforall x (Random(x) -> Akimbo(x))\n\nnot Akimbo(clint)\n\nRandom(clint) and forall x (Random(x) -> Akimbo(x)) -> therefore Akimbo(clint)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Corabel is bereft. Corabel is umpteen. Ardath is styptic. Ardath is numeral. Parnell is panoptical. Parnell is chartless. Patsy is panoptical. If something is panoptical then it is invasive. Smart things are numeral. If something is bereft and panoptical then it is styptic. Smart things are panoptical. Red things are umpteen. If something is umpteen and numeral then it is invasive. All umpteen, styptic things are numeral. If something is panoptical then it is invasive. Parnell is numeral.", "logic": "\nBereft(corabel)\nUmpteen(corabel)\nStyptic(ardath)\nNumeral(ardath)\nPanoptical(parnell)\nChartless(parnell)\nPanoptical(patsy)\nforall x (Panoptical(x) -> Invasive(x))\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Numeral(x))\nforall x (Bereft(x) and Panoptical(x) -> Styptic(x))\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Numeral(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) and Numeral(x) -> Invasive(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) and Styptic(x) -> Numeral(x))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) -> Invasive(x))\n\nNumeral(parnell)\n\nPanoptical(parnell) and forall x (Panoptical(x) -> Invasive(x)) -> therefore Invasive(parnell) Invasive(parnell) and forall x (Invasive(x) -> Numeral(x)) -> therefore Numeral(parnell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Cleva is avifaunal. Cleva is minuscule. Leah is nominated. Leah is debasing. Garvy is primeval. Garvy is metastable. Reeta is primeval. If something is primeval then it is unshapen. Smart things are debasing. If something is avifaunal and primeval then it is nominated. Smart things are primeval. Red things are minuscule. If something is minuscule and debasing then it is unshapen. All minuscule, nominated things are debasing. If something is primeval then it is unshapen. Leah is not unshapen.", "logic": "\nAvifaunal(cleva)\nMinuscule(cleva)\nNominated(leah)\nDebasing(leah)\nPrimeval(garvy)\nMetastable(garvy)\nPrimeval(reeta)\nforall x (Primeval(x) -> Unshapen(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Avifaunal(x) and Primeval(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Primeval(x))\nforall x (Debasing(x) -> Minuscule(x))\nforall x (Minuscule(x) and Debasing(x) -> Unshapen(x))\nforall x (Minuscule(x) and Nominated(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Primeval(x) -> Unshapen(x))\n\nnot Unshapen(leah)\n\nDebasing(leah) and forall x (Debasing(x) -> Minuscule(x)) -> therefore Minuscule(leah) Minuscule(leah) and Debasing(leah) and forall x (Minuscule(x) and Debasing(x) -> Unshapen(x)) -> therefore Unshapen(leah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Kiri is grasping. Kiri is diametral. Grace is biradial. Grace is bettering. Emmery is hypoactive. Emmery is acerbic. Fleurette is hypoactive. If something is hypoactive then it is purifying. Smart things are bettering. If something is grasping and hypoactive then it is biradial. Smart things are hypoactive. Red things are diametral. If something is diametral and bettering then it is purifying. All diametral, biradial things are bettering. If something is hypoactive then it is purifying. Fleurette is diametral.", "logic": "\nGrasping(kiri)\nDiametral(kiri)\nBiradial(grace)\nBettering(grace)\nHypoactive(emmery)\nAcerbic(emmery)\nHypoactive(fleurette)\nforall x (Hypoactive(x) -> Purifying(x))\nforall x (Purifying(x) -> Bettering(x))\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Hypoactive(x) -> Biradial(x))\nforall x (Purifying(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Bettering(x) -> Diametral(x))\nforall x (Diametral(x) and Bettering(x) -> Purifying(x))\nforall x (Diametral(x) and Biradial(x) -> Bettering(x))\nforall x (Hypoactive(x) -> Purifying(x))\n\nDiametral(fleurette)\n\nHypoactive(fleurette) and forall x (Hypoactive(x) -> Purifying(x)) -> therefore Purifying(fleurette) Purifying(fleurette) and forall x (Purifying(x) -> Bettering(x)) -> therefore Bettering(fleurette) Bettering(fleurette) and forall x (Bettering(x) -> Diametral(x)) -> therefore Diametral(fleurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Hugo is alchemic. Hugo is snazzy. Egbert is hypotonic. Egbert is ungummed. Gerrit is caudated. Gerrit is aided. Kerrie is caudated. If something is caudated then it is stormbound. Smart things are ungummed. If something is alchemic and caudated then it is hypotonic. Smart things are caudated. Red things are snazzy. If something is snazzy and ungummed then it is stormbound. All snazzy, hypotonic things are ungummed. If something is caudated then it is stormbound. Egbert is not caudated.", "logic": "\nAlchemic(hugo)\nSnazzy(hugo)\nHypotonic(egbert)\nUngummed(egbert)\nCaudated(gerrit)\nAided(gerrit)\nCaudated(kerrie)\nforall x (Caudated(x) -> Stormbound(x))\nforall x (Stormbound(x) -> Ungummed(x))\nforall x (Alchemic(x) and Caudated(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Stormbound(x) -> Caudated(x))\nforall x (Ungummed(x) -> Snazzy(x))\nforall x (Snazzy(x) and Ungummed(x) -> Stormbound(x))\nforall x (Snazzy(x) and Hypotonic(x) -> Ungummed(x))\nforall x (Caudated(x) -> Stormbound(x))\n\nnot Caudated(egbert)\n\nUngummed(egbert) and forall x (Ungummed(x) -> Snazzy(x)) -> therefore Snazzy(egbert) Snazzy(egbert) and Ungummed(egbert) and forall x (Snazzy(x) and Ungummed(x) -> Stormbound(x)) -> therefore Stormbound(egbert) Stormbound(egbert) and forall x (Stormbound(x) -> Caudated(x)) -> therefore Caudated(egbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Raine is most. Raine is unsociable. Euphemia is cruddy. Euphemia is nauruan. Denise is abstruse. Denise is worthful. Marcella is abstruse. If something is abstruse then it is phyllodial. Smart things are nauruan. If something is most and abstruse then it is cruddy. Smart things are abstruse. Red things are unsociable. If something is unsociable and nauruan then it is phyllodial. All unsociable, cruddy things are nauruan. If something is abstruse then it is phyllodial. Denise is not cruddy.", "logic": "\nMost(raine)\nUnsociable(raine)\nCruddy(euphemia)\nNauruan(euphemia)\nAbstruse(denise)\nWorthful(denise)\nAbstruse(marcella)\nforall x (Abstruse(x) -> Phyllodial(x))\nforall x (Phyllodial(x) -> Nauruan(x))\nforall x (Most(x) and Abstruse(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Phyllodial(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Nauruan(x) -> Unsociable(x))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Nauruan(x) -> Phyllodial(x))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Cruddy(x) -> Nauruan(x))\nforall x (Abstruse(x) -> Phyllodial(x))\n\nnot Cruddy(denise)\n\nforall x (Most(x) and Abstruse(x) -> Cruddy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Dorrie is armed. Dorrie is passerine. Wayland is underived. Wayland is anadromous. Ceil is trillion. Ceil is well. Valera is trillion. If something is trillion then it is soaring. Smart things are anadromous. If something is armed and trillion then it is underived. Smart things are trillion. Red things are passerine. If something is passerine and anadromous then it is soaring. All passerine, underived things are anadromous. If something is trillion then it is soaring. Dorrie is soaring.", "logic": "\nArmed(dorrie)\nPasserine(dorrie)\nUnderived(wayland)\nAnadromous(wayland)\nTrillion(ceil)\nWell(ceil)\nTrillion(valera)\nforall x (Trillion(x) -> Soaring(x))\nforall x (Soaring(x) -> Anadromous(x))\nforall x (Armed(x) and Trillion(x) -> Underived(x))\nforall x (Soaring(x) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Anadromous(x) -> Passerine(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Anadromous(x) -> Soaring(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Underived(x) -> Anadromous(x))\nforall x (Trillion(x) -> Soaring(x))\n\nSoaring(dorrie)\n\nforall x (Trillion(x) -> Soaring(x)) <- forall x (Soaring(x) -> Trillion(x)) <- forall x (Passerine(x) and Anadromous(x) -> Soaring(x)) <- forall x (Soaring(x) -> Anadromous(x)) <- forall x (Trillion(x) -> Soaring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Megen is such. Megen is unmerited. Emmett is apetalous. Emmett is penal. Roby is assisted. Roby is westerly. Tray is assisted. If something is assisted then it is skilled. Smart things are penal. If something is such and assisted then it is apetalous. Smart things are assisted. Red things are unmerited. If something is unmerited and penal then it is skilled. All unmerited, apetalous things are penal. If something is assisted then it is skilled. Tray is not apetalous.", "logic": "\nSuch(megen)\nUnmerited(megen)\nApetalous(emmett)\nPenal(emmett)\nAssisted(roby)\nWesterly(roby)\nAssisted(tray)\nforall x (Assisted(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Penal(x))\nforall x (Such(x) and Assisted(x) -> Apetalous(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Assisted(x))\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Unmerited(x))\nforall x (Unmerited(x) and Penal(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Unmerited(x) and Apetalous(x) -> Penal(x))\nforall x (Assisted(x) -> Skilled(x))\n\nnot Apetalous(tray)\n\nforall x (Such(x) and Assisted(x) -> Apetalous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Jesus is droopy. Jesus is thumping. Sacha is goateed. Sacha is indiscreet. Valeria is renewing. Valeria is unlaureled. Ardine is renewing. If something is renewing then it is guarded. Smart things are indiscreet. If something is droopy and renewing then it is goateed. Smart things are renewing. Red things are thumping. If something is thumping and indiscreet then it is guarded. All thumping, goateed things are indiscreet. If something is renewing then it is guarded. Jesus is renewing.", "logic": "\nDroopy(jesus)\nThumping(jesus)\nGoateed(sacha)\nIndiscreet(sacha)\nRenewing(valeria)\nUnlaureled(valeria)\nRenewing(ardine)\nforall x (Renewing(x) -> Guarded(x))\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Indiscreet(x))\nforall x (Droopy(x) and Renewing(x) -> Goateed(x))\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Renewing(x))\nforall x (Indiscreet(x) -> Thumping(x))\nforall x (Thumping(x) and Indiscreet(x) -> Guarded(x))\nforall x (Thumping(x) and Goateed(x) -> Indiscreet(x))\nforall x (Renewing(x) -> Guarded(x))\n\nRenewing(jesus)\n\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Renewing(x)) <- forall x (Thumping(x) and Indiscreet(x) -> Guarded(x)) <- forall x (Guarded(x) -> Indiscreet(x)) <- forall x (Renewing(x) -> Guarded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Gertrudis is sensible. Gertrudis is born. Charmian is plowed. Charmian is antimonial. Perceval is biaxial. Perceval is mensal. Ibbie is biaxial. If something is biaxial then it is governable. Smart things are antimonial. If something is sensible and biaxial then it is plowed. Smart things are biaxial. Red things are born. If something is born and antimonial then it is governable. All born, plowed things are antimonial. If something is biaxial then it is governable. Ibbie is not sensible.", "logic": "\nSensible(gertrudis)\nBorn(gertrudis)\nPlowed(charmian)\nAntimonial(charmian)\nBiaxial(perceval)\nMensal(perceval)\nBiaxial(ibbie)\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Governable(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) and Biaxial(x) -> Plowed(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) -> Biaxial(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Born(x))\nforall x (Born(x) and Antimonial(x) -> Governable(x))\nforall x (Born(x) and Plowed(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Governable(x))\n\nnot Sensible(ibbie)\n\nnot Sensible(ibbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Cecile is piddling. Cecile is ebracteate. Waiter is exogamous. Waiter is alright. Eimile is adrift. Eimile is undersized. Ariana is adrift. If something is adrift then it is saving. Smart things are alright. If something is piddling and adrift then it is exogamous. Smart things are adrift. Red things are ebracteate. If something is ebracteate and alright then it is saving. All ebracteate, exogamous things are alright. If something is adrift then it is saving. Cecile is undersized.", "logic": "\nPiddling(cecile)\nEbracteate(cecile)\nExogamous(waiter)\nAlright(waiter)\nAdrift(eimile)\nUndersized(eimile)\nAdrift(ariana)\nforall x (Adrift(x) -> Saving(x))\nforall x (Saving(x) -> Alright(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) and Adrift(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nforall x (Saving(x) -> Adrift(x))\nforall x (Alright(x) -> Ebracteate(x))\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) and Alright(x) -> Saving(x))\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) and Exogamous(x) -> Alright(x))\nforall x (Adrift(x) -> Saving(x))\n\nUndersized(cecile)\n\nUndersized(cecile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Reginald is sprightly. Reginald is uniformed. Kate is hitlerian. Kate is unearthly. Lorine is downstream. Lorine is nonaligned. Carolina is downstream. If something is downstream then it is thronged. Smart things are unearthly. If something is sprightly and downstream then it is hitlerian. Smart things are downstream. Red things are uniformed. If something is uniformed and unearthly then it is thronged. All uniformed, hitlerian things are unearthly. If something is downstream then it is thronged. Lorine is not sprightly.", "logic": "\nSprightly(reginald)\nUniformed(reginald)\nHitlerian(kate)\nUnearthly(kate)\nDownstream(lorine)\nNonaligned(lorine)\nDownstream(carolina)\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> Thronged(x))\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Sprightly(x) and Downstream(x) -> Hitlerian(x))\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Downstream(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> Uniformed(x))\nforall x (Uniformed(x) and Unearthly(x) -> Thronged(x))\nforall x (Uniformed(x) and Hitlerian(x) -> Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> Thronged(x))\n\nnot Sprightly(lorine)\n\nnot Sprightly(lorine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Tonia is unrevealed. Tonia is funicular. Samantha is algonquin. Samantha is quadruplex. Elissa is callable. Elissa is cruddy. Hulda is callable. If something is callable then it is leafy. Smart things are quadruplex. If something is unrevealed and callable then it is algonquin. Smart things are callable. Red things are funicular. If something is funicular and quadruplex then it is leafy. All funicular, algonquin things are quadruplex. If something is callable then it is leafy. Samantha is cruddy.", "logic": "\nUnrevealed(tonia)\nFunicular(tonia)\nAlgonquin(samantha)\nQuadruplex(samantha)\nCallable(elissa)\nCruddy(elissa)\nCallable(hulda)\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) and Callable(x) -> Algonquin(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) -> Callable(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) -> Funicular(x))\nforall x (Funicular(x) and Quadruplex(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Funicular(x) and Algonquin(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Leafy(x))\n\nCruddy(samantha)\n\nCruddy(samantha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The hamish does not chase the renato. The hamish is appealable. The hamish is goateed. The hamish is malian. The hamish does not see the renato. The wolfgang demodulate the hamish. The wolfgang demodulate the renato. The wolfgang is malian. The wolfgang exceed the hamish. The renato demodulate the hamish. The renato does not chase the wolfgang. The renato is ready. The renato is airy. The renato exceed the wolfgang. The renato penalise the hamish. If something penalise the renato then the renato penalise the wolfgang. If something demodulate the hamish and it exceed the wolfgang then the hamish penalise the wolfgang. If the renato exceed the wolfgang and the renato is ready then the wolfgang penalise the renato. If the renato exceed the hamish then the hamish is ready. If something exceed the renato then it penalise the renato. If something penalise the hamish then it is goateed. If the renato penalise the wolfgang then the wolfgang penalise the hamish. If something exceed the renato then the renato exceed the hamish. The hamish does not chase the renato.", "logic": "\nnot Demodulate(hamish, renato)\nAppealable(hamish)\nGoateed(hamish)\nMalian(hamish)\nnot Penalise(hamish, renato)\nDemodulate(wolfgang, hamish)\nDemodulate(wolfgang, renato)\nMalian(wolfgang)\nExceed(wolfgang, hamish)\nDemodulate(renato, hamish)\nnot Demodulate(renato, wolfgang)\nReady(renato)\nAiry(renato)\nExceed(renato, wolfgang)\nPenalise(renato, hamish)\nforall x (Penalise(x, renato) -> Penalise(renato, wolfgang))\nforall x (Demodulate(x, hamish) and Exceed(x, wolfgang) -> Penalise(hamish, wolfgang))\nExceed(renato, wolfgang) and Ready(renato) -> Penalise(wolfgang, renato)\nExceed(renato, hamish) -> Ready(hamish)\nforall x (Exceed(x, renato) -> Penalise(x, renato))\nforall x (Penalise(x, hamish) -> Goateed(x))\nPenalise(renato, wolfgang) -> Penalise(wolfgang, hamish)\nforall x (Exceed(x, renato) -> Exceed(renato, hamish))\n\nnot Demodulate(hamish, renato)\n\ntherefore not Demodulate(hamish, renato)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The julieta does not chase the ninette. The julieta is contagious. The julieta is susurrant. The julieta is suicidal. The julieta does not see the ninette. The godart belabour the julieta. The godart belabour the ninette. The godart is suicidal. The godart bray the julieta. The ninette belabour the julieta. The ninette does not chase the godart. The ninette is baffling. The ninette is unmixed. The ninette bray the godart. The ninette blackmail the julieta. If something blackmail the ninette then the ninette blackmail the godart. If something belabour the julieta and it bray the godart then the julieta blackmail the godart. If the ninette bray the godart and the ninette is baffling then the godart blackmail the ninette. If the ninette bray the julieta then the julieta is baffling. If something bray the ninette then it blackmail the ninette. If something blackmail the julieta then it is susurrant. If the ninette blackmail the godart then the godart blackmail the julieta. If something bray the ninette then the ninette bray the julieta. The julieta is not contagious.", "logic": "\nnot Belabour(julieta, ninette)\nContagious(julieta)\nSusurrant(julieta)\nSuicidal(julieta)\nnot Blackmail(julieta, ninette)\nBelabour(godart, julieta)\nBelabour(godart, ninette)\nSuicidal(godart)\nBray(godart, julieta)\nBelabour(ninette, julieta)\nnot Belabour(ninette, godart)\nBaffling(ninette)\nUnmixed(ninette)\nBray(ninette, godart)\nBlackmail(ninette, julieta)\nforall x (Blackmail(x, ninette) -> Blackmail(ninette, godart))\nforall x (Belabour(x, julieta) and Bray(x, godart) -> Blackmail(julieta, godart))\nBray(ninette, godart) and Baffling(ninette) -> Blackmail(godart, ninette)\nBray(ninette, julieta) -> Baffling(julieta)\nforall x (Bray(x, ninette) -> Blackmail(x, ninette))\nforall x (Blackmail(x, julieta) -> Susurrant(x))\nBlackmail(ninette, godart) -> Blackmail(godart, julieta)\nforall x (Bray(x, ninette) -> Bray(ninette, julieta))\n\nnot Contagious(julieta)\n\ntherefore Contagious(julieta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The xenia does not chase the lulita. The xenia is crinkly. The xenia is answering. The xenia is stiff. The xenia does not see the lulita. The melisande jitterbug the xenia. The melisande jitterbug the lulita. The melisande is stiff. The melisande booze the xenia. The lulita jitterbug the xenia. The lulita does not chase the melisande. The lulita is lxxxiv. The lulita is nappy. The lulita booze the melisande. The lulita choose the xenia. If something choose the lulita then the lulita choose the melisande. If something jitterbug the xenia and it booze the melisande then the xenia choose the melisande. If the lulita booze the melisande and the lulita is lxxxiv then the melisande choose the lulita. If the lulita booze the xenia then the xenia is lxxxiv. If something booze the lulita then it choose the lulita. If something choose the xenia then it is answering. If the lulita choose the melisande then the melisande choose the xenia. If something booze the lulita then the lulita booze the xenia. The melisande choose the lulita.", "logic": "\nnot Jitterbug(xenia, lulita)\nCrinkly(xenia)\nAnswering(xenia)\nStiff(xenia)\nnot Choose(xenia, lulita)\nJitterbug(melisande, xenia)\nJitterbug(melisande, lulita)\nStiff(melisande)\nBooze(melisande, xenia)\nJitterbug(lulita, xenia)\nnot Jitterbug(lulita, melisande)\nLxxxiv(lulita)\nNappy(lulita)\nBooze(lulita, melisande)\nChoose(lulita, xenia)\nforall x (Choose(x, lulita) -> Choose(lulita, melisande))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, xenia) and Booze(x, melisande) -> Choose(xenia, melisande))\nBooze(lulita, melisande) and Lxxxiv(lulita) -> Choose(melisande, lulita)\nBooze(lulita, xenia) -> Lxxxiv(xenia)\nforall x (Booze(x, lulita) -> Choose(x, lulita))\nforall x (Choose(x, xenia) -> Answering(x))\nChoose(lulita, melisande) -> Choose(melisande, xenia)\nforall x (Booze(x, lulita) -> Booze(lulita, xenia))\n\nChoose(melisande, lulita)\n\nBooze(lulita, melisande) and Lxxxiv(lulita) and Booze(lulita, melisande) and Lxxxiv(lulita) -> Choose(melisande, lulita) -> therefore Choose(melisande, lulita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The emmye does not chase the deerdre. The emmye is priggish. The emmye is piano. The emmye is stocked. The emmye does not see the deerdre. The evette opsonize the emmye. The evette opsonize the deerdre. The evette is stocked. The evette pierce the emmye. The deerdre opsonize the emmye. The deerdre does not chase the evette. The deerdre is domed. The deerdre is proximal. The deerdre pierce the evette. The deerdre swob the emmye. If something swob the deerdre then the deerdre swob the evette. If something opsonize the emmye and it pierce the evette then the emmye swob the evette. If the deerdre pierce the evette and the deerdre is domed then the evette swob the deerdre. If the deerdre pierce the emmye then the emmye is domed. If something pierce the deerdre then it swob the deerdre. If something swob the emmye then it is piano. If the deerdre swob the evette then the evette swob the emmye. If something pierce the deerdre then the deerdre pierce the emmye. The emmye does not see the evette.", "logic": "\nnot Opsonize(emmye, deerdre)\nPriggish(emmye)\nPiano(emmye)\nStocked(emmye)\nnot Swob(emmye, deerdre)\nOpsonize(evette, emmye)\nOpsonize(evette, deerdre)\nStocked(evette)\nPierce(evette, emmye)\nOpsonize(deerdre, emmye)\nnot Opsonize(deerdre, evette)\nDomed(deerdre)\nProximal(deerdre)\nPierce(deerdre, evette)\nSwob(deerdre, emmye)\nforall x (Swob(x, deerdre) -> Swob(deerdre, evette))\nforall x (Opsonize(x, emmye) and Pierce(x, evette) -> Swob(emmye, evette))\nPierce(deerdre, evette) and Domed(deerdre) -> Swob(evette, deerdre)\nPierce(deerdre, emmye) -> Domed(emmye)\nforall x (Pierce(x, deerdre) -> Swob(x, deerdre))\nforall x (Swob(x, emmye) -> Piano(x))\nSwob(deerdre, evette) -> Swob(evette, emmye)\nforall x (Pierce(x, deerdre) -> Pierce(deerdre, emmye))\n\nnot Swob(emmye, evette)\n\nOpsonize(deerdre, emmye) and Pierce(deerdre, evette) and forall x (Opsonize(x, emmye) and Pierce(x, evette) -> Swob(emmye, evette)) -> therefore Swob(emmye, evette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The harlie does not chase the tull. The harlie is unclouded. The harlie is trophic. The harlie is napping. The harlie does not see the tull. The krishna trench the harlie. The krishna trench the tull. The krishna is napping. The krishna accrete the harlie. The tull trench the harlie. The tull does not chase the krishna. The tull is diaphyseal. The tull is immunized. The tull accrete the krishna. The tull graph the harlie. If something graph the tull then the tull graph the krishna. If something trench the harlie and it accrete the krishna then the harlie graph the krishna. If the tull accrete the krishna and the tull is diaphyseal then the krishna graph the tull. If the tull accrete the harlie then the harlie is diaphyseal. If something accrete the tull then it graph the tull. If something graph the harlie then it is trophic. If the tull graph the krishna then the krishna graph the harlie. If something accrete the tull then the tull accrete the harlie. The tull graph the krishna.", "logic": "\nnot Trench(harlie, tull)\nUnclouded(harlie)\nTrophic(harlie)\nNapping(harlie)\nnot Graph(harlie, tull)\nTrench(krishna, harlie)\nTrench(krishna, tull)\nNapping(krishna)\nAccrete(krishna, harlie)\nTrench(tull, harlie)\nnot Trench(tull, krishna)\nDiaphyseal(tull)\nImmunized(tull)\nAccrete(tull, krishna)\nGraph(tull, harlie)\nforall x (Graph(x, tull) -> Graph(tull, krishna))\nforall x (Trench(x, harlie) and Accrete(x, krishna) -> Graph(harlie, krishna))\nAccrete(tull, krishna) and Diaphyseal(tull) -> Graph(krishna, tull)\nAccrete(tull, harlie) -> Diaphyseal(harlie)\nforall x (Accrete(x, tull) -> Graph(x, tull))\nforall x (Graph(x, harlie) -> Trophic(x))\nGraph(tull, krishna) -> Graph(krishna, harlie)\nforall x (Accrete(x, tull) -> Accrete(tull, harlie))\n\nGraph(tull, krishna)\n\nAccrete(tull, krishna) and Diaphyseal(tull) and Accrete(tull, krishna) and Diaphyseal(tull) -> Graph(krishna, tull) -> therefore Graph(krishna, tull) Graph(krishna, tull) and forall x (Graph(x, tull) -> Graph(tull, krishna)) -> therefore Graph(tull, krishna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The konrad does not chase the lara. The konrad is papillose. The konrad is thumping. The konrad is gnomic. The konrad does not see the lara. The karna unicycle the konrad. The karna unicycle the lara. The karna is gnomic. The karna emphasise the konrad. The lara unicycle the konrad. The lara does not chase the karna. The lara is synergetic. The lara is diatomic. The lara emphasise the karna. The lara crack the konrad. If something crack the lara then the lara crack the karna. If something unicycle the konrad and it emphasise the karna then the konrad crack the karna. If the lara emphasise the karna and the lara is synergetic then the karna crack the lara. If the lara emphasise the konrad then the konrad is synergetic. If something emphasise the lara then it crack the lara. If something crack the konrad then it is thumping. If the lara crack the karna then the karna crack the konrad. If something emphasise the lara then the lara emphasise the konrad. The lara does not see the karna.", "logic": "\nnot Unicycle(konrad, lara)\nPapillose(konrad)\nThumping(konrad)\nGnomic(konrad)\nnot Crack(konrad, lara)\nUnicycle(karna, konrad)\nUnicycle(karna, lara)\nGnomic(karna)\nEmphasise(karna, konrad)\nUnicycle(lara, konrad)\nnot Unicycle(lara, karna)\nSynergetic(lara)\nDiatomic(lara)\nEmphasise(lara, karna)\nCrack(lara, konrad)\nforall x (Crack(x, lara) -> Crack(lara, karna))\nforall x (Unicycle(x, konrad) and Emphasise(x, karna) -> Crack(konrad, karna))\nEmphasise(lara, karna) and Synergetic(lara) -> Crack(karna, lara)\nEmphasise(lara, konrad) -> Synergetic(konrad)\nforall x (Emphasise(x, lara) -> Crack(x, lara))\nforall x (Crack(x, konrad) -> Thumping(x))\nCrack(lara, karna) -> Crack(karna, konrad)\nforall x (Emphasise(x, lara) -> Emphasise(lara, konrad))\n\nnot Crack(lara, karna)\n\nEmphasise(lara, karna) and Synergetic(lara) and Emphasise(lara, karna) and Synergetic(lara) -> Crack(karna, lara) -> therefore Crack(karna, lara) Crack(karna, lara) and forall x (Crack(x, lara) -> Crack(lara, karna)) -> therefore Crack(lara, karna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The hollie does not chase the corabel. The hollie is latticed. The hollie is innoxious. The hollie is alveolar. The hollie does not see the corabel. The pen inject the hollie. The pen inject the corabel. The pen is alveolar. The pen disbar the hollie. The corabel inject the hollie. The corabel does not chase the pen. The corabel is fifteenth. The corabel is mechanic. The corabel disbar the pen. The corabel gutter the hollie. If something gutter the corabel then the corabel gutter the pen. If something inject the hollie and it disbar the pen then the hollie gutter the pen. If the corabel disbar the pen and the corabel is fifteenth then the pen gutter the corabel. If the corabel disbar the hollie then the hollie is fifteenth. If something disbar the corabel then it gutter the corabel. If something gutter the hollie then it is innoxious. If the corabel gutter the pen then the pen gutter the hollie. If something disbar the corabel then the corabel disbar the hollie. The pen gutter the hollie.", "logic": "\nnot Inject(hollie, corabel)\nLatticed(hollie)\nInnoxious(hollie)\nAlveolar(hollie)\nnot Gutter(hollie, corabel)\nInject(pen, hollie)\nInject(pen, corabel)\nAlveolar(pen)\nDisbar(pen, hollie)\nInject(corabel, hollie)\nnot Inject(corabel, pen)\nFifteenth(corabel)\nMechanic(corabel)\nDisbar(corabel, pen)\nGutter(corabel, hollie)\nforall x (Gutter(x, corabel) -> Gutter(corabel, pen))\nforall x (Inject(x, hollie) and Disbar(x, pen) -> Gutter(hollie, pen))\nDisbar(corabel, pen) and Fifteenth(corabel) -> Gutter(pen, corabel)\nDisbar(corabel, hollie) -> Fifteenth(hollie)\nforall x (Disbar(x, corabel) -> Gutter(x, corabel))\nforall x (Gutter(x, hollie) -> Innoxious(x))\nGutter(corabel, pen) -> Gutter(pen, hollie)\nforall x (Disbar(x, corabel) -> Disbar(corabel, hollie))\n\nGutter(pen, hollie)\n\nDisbar(corabel, pen) and Fifteenth(corabel) and Disbar(corabel, pen) and Fifteenth(corabel) -> Gutter(pen, corabel) -> therefore Gutter(pen, corabel) Gutter(pen, corabel) and forall x (Gutter(x, corabel) -> Gutter(corabel, pen)) -> therefore Gutter(corabel, pen) Gutter(corabel, pen) and Gutter(corabel, pen) -> Gutter(pen, hollie) -> therefore Gutter(pen, hollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The marjie does not chase the meghan. The marjie is crisscross. The marjie is reduced. The marjie is angulate. The marjie does not see the meghan. The sophia regain the marjie. The sophia regain the meghan. The sophia is angulate. The sophia imprison the marjie. The meghan regain the marjie. The meghan does not chase the sophia. The meghan is reflecting. The meghan is inland. The meghan imprison the sophia. The meghan forget the marjie. If something forget the meghan then the meghan forget the sophia. If something regain the marjie and it imprison the sophia then the marjie forget the sophia. If the meghan imprison the sophia and the meghan is reflecting then the sophia forget the meghan. If the meghan imprison the marjie then the marjie is reflecting. If something imprison the meghan then it forget the meghan. If something forget the marjie then it is reduced. If the meghan forget the sophia then the sophia forget the marjie. If something imprison the meghan then the meghan imprison the marjie. The sophia does not see the marjie.", "logic": "\nnot Regain(marjie, meghan)\nCrisscross(marjie)\nReduced(marjie)\nAngulate(marjie)\nnot Forget(marjie, meghan)\nRegain(sophia, marjie)\nRegain(sophia, meghan)\nAngulate(sophia)\nImprison(sophia, marjie)\nRegain(meghan, marjie)\nnot Regain(meghan, sophia)\nReflecting(meghan)\nInland(meghan)\nImprison(meghan, sophia)\nForget(meghan, marjie)\nforall x (Forget(x, meghan) -> Forget(meghan, sophia))\nforall x (Regain(x, marjie) and Imprison(x, sophia) -> Forget(marjie, sophia))\nImprison(meghan, sophia) and Reflecting(meghan) -> Forget(sophia, meghan)\nImprison(meghan, marjie) -> Reflecting(marjie)\nforall x (Imprison(x, meghan) -> Forget(x, meghan))\nforall x (Forget(x, marjie) -> Reduced(x))\nForget(meghan, sophia) -> Forget(sophia, marjie)\nforall x (Imprison(x, meghan) -> Imprison(meghan, marjie))\n\nnot Forget(sophia, marjie)\n\nImprison(meghan, sophia) and Reflecting(meghan) and Imprison(meghan, sophia) and Reflecting(meghan) -> Forget(sophia, meghan) -> therefore Forget(sophia, meghan) Forget(sophia, meghan) and forall x (Forget(x, meghan) -> Forget(meghan, sophia)) -> therefore Forget(meghan, sophia) Forget(meghan, sophia) and Forget(meghan, sophia) -> Forget(sophia, marjie) -> therefore Forget(sophia, marjie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The gavra does not chase the marcelo. The gavra is alkahestic. The gavra is unreal. The gavra is acronymous. The gavra does not see the marcelo. The lemmie argue the gavra. The lemmie argue the marcelo. The lemmie is acronymous. The lemmie fluctuate the gavra. The marcelo argue the gavra. The marcelo does not chase the lemmie. The marcelo is basidial. The marcelo is calendered. The marcelo fluctuate the lemmie. The marcelo aliment the gavra. If something aliment the marcelo then the marcelo aliment the lemmie. If something argue the gavra and it fluctuate the lemmie then the gavra aliment the lemmie. If the marcelo fluctuate the lemmie and the marcelo is basidial then the lemmie aliment the marcelo. If the marcelo fluctuate the gavra then the gavra is basidial. If something fluctuate the marcelo then it aliment the marcelo. If something aliment the gavra then it is unreal. If the marcelo aliment the lemmie then the lemmie aliment the gavra. If something fluctuate the marcelo then the marcelo fluctuate the gavra. The marcelo does not see the marcelo.", "logic": "\nnot Argue(gavra, marcelo)\nAlkahestic(gavra)\nUnreal(gavra)\nAcronymous(gavra)\nnot Aliment(gavra, marcelo)\nArgue(lemmie, gavra)\nArgue(lemmie, marcelo)\nAcronymous(lemmie)\nFluctuate(lemmie, gavra)\nArgue(marcelo, gavra)\nnot Argue(marcelo, lemmie)\nBasidial(marcelo)\nCalendered(marcelo)\nFluctuate(marcelo, lemmie)\nAliment(marcelo, gavra)\nforall x (Aliment(x, marcelo) -> Aliment(marcelo, lemmie))\nforall x (Argue(x, gavra) and Fluctuate(x, lemmie) -> Aliment(gavra, lemmie))\nFluctuate(marcelo, lemmie) and Basidial(marcelo) -> Aliment(lemmie, marcelo)\nFluctuate(marcelo, gavra) -> Basidial(gavra)\nforall x (Fluctuate(x, marcelo) -> Aliment(x, marcelo))\nforall x (Aliment(x, gavra) -> Unreal(x))\nAliment(marcelo, lemmie) -> Aliment(lemmie, gavra)\nforall x (Fluctuate(x, marcelo) -> Fluctuate(marcelo, gavra))\n\nnot Aliment(marcelo, marcelo)\n\nforall x (Fluctuate(x, marcelo) -> Aliment(x, marcelo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The georgia does not chase the kerstin. The georgia is appellate. The georgia is enumerable. The georgia is surging. The georgia does not see the kerstin. The cristie draggle the georgia. The cristie draggle the kerstin. The cristie is surging. The cristie blither the georgia. The kerstin draggle the georgia. The kerstin does not chase the cristie. The kerstin is hemophilic. The kerstin is bogartian. The kerstin blither the cristie. The kerstin mizzle the georgia. If something mizzle the kerstin then the kerstin mizzle the cristie. If something draggle the georgia and it blither the cristie then the georgia mizzle the cristie. If the kerstin blither the cristie and the kerstin is hemophilic then the cristie mizzle the kerstin. If the kerstin blither the georgia then the georgia is hemophilic. If something blither the kerstin then it mizzle the kerstin. If something mizzle the georgia then it is enumerable. If the kerstin mizzle the cristie then the cristie mizzle the georgia. If something blither the kerstin then the kerstin blither the georgia. The georgia is hemophilic.", "logic": "\nnot Draggle(georgia, kerstin)\nAppellate(georgia)\nEnumerable(georgia)\nSurging(georgia)\nnot Mizzle(georgia, kerstin)\nDraggle(cristie, georgia)\nDraggle(cristie, kerstin)\nSurging(cristie)\nBlither(cristie, georgia)\nDraggle(kerstin, georgia)\nnot Draggle(kerstin, cristie)\nHemophilic(kerstin)\nBogartian(kerstin)\nBlither(kerstin, cristie)\nMizzle(kerstin, georgia)\nforall x (Mizzle(x, kerstin) -> Mizzle(kerstin, cristie))\nforall x (Draggle(x, georgia) and Blither(x, cristie) -> Mizzle(georgia, cristie))\nBlither(kerstin, cristie) and Hemophilic(kerstin) -> Mizzle(cristie, kerstin)\nBlither(kerstin, georgia) -> Hemophilic(georgia)\nforall x (Blither(x, kerstin) -> Mizzle(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Mizzle(x, georgia) -> Enumerable(x))\nMizzle(kerstin, cristie) -> Mizzle(cristie, georgia)\nforall x (Blither(x, kerstin) -> Blither(kerstin, georgia))\n\nHemophilic(georgia)\n\nBlither(kerstin, georgia) -> Hemophilic(georgia) <- forall x (Blither(x, kerstin) -> Blither(kerstin, georgia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The delphinia does not chase the renell. The delphinia is lidless. The delphinia is beamy. The delphinia is cosher. The delphinia does not see the renell. The samuel levy the delphinia. The samuel levy the renell. The samuel is cosher. The samuel contain the delphinia. The renell levy the delphinia. The renell does not chase the samuel. The renell is illegal. The renell is ordinary. The renell contain the samuel. The renell worm the delphinia. If something worm the renell then the renell worm the samuel. If something levy the delphinia and it contain the samuel then the delphinia worm the samuel. If the renell contain the samuel and the renell is illegal then the samuel worm the renell. If the renell contain the delphinia then the delphinia is illegal. If something contain the renell then it worm the renell. If something worm the delphinia then it is beamy. If the renell worm the samuel then the samuel worm the delphinia. If something contain the renell then the renell contain the delphinia. The renell does not like the delphinia.", "logic": "\nnot Levy(delphinia, renell)\nLidless(delphinia)\nBeamy(delphinia)\nCosher(delphinia)\nnot Worm(delphinia, renell)\nLevy(samuel, delphinia)\nLevy(samuel, renell)\nCosher(samuel)\nContain(samuel, delphinia)\nLevy(renell, delphinia)\nnot Levy(renell, samuel)\nIllegal(renell)\nOrdinary(renell)\nContain(renell, samuel)\nWorm(renell, delphinia)\nforall x (Worm(x, renell) -> Worm(renell, samuel))\nforall x (Levy(x, delphinia) and Contain(x, samuel) -> Worm(delphinia, samuel))\nContain(renell, samuel) and Illegal(renell) -> Worm(samuel, renell)\nContain(renell, delphinia) -> Illegal(delphinia)\nforall x (Contain(x, renell) -> Worm(x, renell))\nforall x (Worm(x, delphinia) -> Beamy(x))\nWorm(renell, samuel) -> Worm(samuel, delphinia)\nforall x (Contain(x, renell) -> Contain(renell, delphinia))\n\nnot Contain(renell, delphinia)\n\nforall x (Contain(x, renell) -> Contain(renell, delphinia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The roseann does not chase the leola. The roseann is granitic. The roseann is educative. The roseann is derivable. The roseann does not see the leola. The riki disband the roseann. The riki disband the leola. The riki is derivable. The riki substitute the roseann. The leola disband the roseann. The leola does not chase the riki. The leola is untimely. The leola is complacent. The leola substitute the riki. The leola overpower the roseann. If something overpower the leola then the leola overpower the riki. If something disband the roseann and it substitute the riki then the roseann overpower the riki. If the leola substitute the riki and the leola is untimely then the riki overpower the leola. If the leola substitute the roseann then the roseann is untimely. If something substitute the leola then it overpower the leola. If something overpower the roseann then it is educative. If the leola overpower the riki then the riki overpower the roseann. If something substitute the leola then the leola substitute the roseann. The riki substitute the leola.", "logic": "\nnot Disband(roseann, leola)\nGranitic(roseann)\nEducative(roseann)\nDerivable(roseann)\nnot Overpower(roseann, leola)\nDisband(riki, roseann)\nDisband(riki, leola)\nDerivable(riki)\nSubstitute(riki, roseann)\nDisband(leola, roseann)\nnot Disband(leola, riki)\nUntimely(leola)\nComplacent(leola)\nSubstitute(leola, riki)\nOverpower(leola, roseann)\nforall x (Overpower(x, leola) -> Overpower(leola, riki))\nforall x (Disband(x, roseann) and Substitute(x, riki) -> Overpower(roseann, riki))\nSubstitute(leola, riki) and Untimely(leola) -> Overpower(riki, leola)\nSubstitute(leola, roseann) -> Untimely(roseann)\nforall x (Substitute(x, leola) -> Overpower(x, leola))\nforall x (Overpower(x, roseann) -> Educative(x))\nOverpower(leola, riki) -> Overpower(riki, roseann)\nforall x (Substitute(x, leola) -> Substitute(leola, roseann))\n\nSubstitute(riki, leola)\n\nSubstitute(riki, leola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The wilfrid does not chase the cyrillus. The wilfrid is edifying. The wilfrid is forte. The wilfrid is sodden. The wilfrid does not see the cyrillus. The kristina eternalise the wilfrid. The kristina eternalise the cyrillus. The kristina is sodden. The kristina lambast the wilfrid. The cyrillus eternalise the wilfrid. The cyrillus does not chase the kristina. The cyrillus is upraised. The cyrillus is guiltless. The cyrillus lambast the kristina. The cyrillus overcrowd the wilfrid. If something overcrowd the cyrillus then the cyrillus overcrowd the kristina. If something eternalise the wilfrid and it lambast the kristina then the wilfrid overcrowd the kristina. If the cyrillus lambast the kristina and the cyrillus is upraised then the kristina overcrowd the cyrillus. If the cyrillus lambast the wilfrid then the wilfrid is upraised. If something lambast the cyrillus then it overcrowd the cyrillus. If something overcrowd the wilfrid then it is forte. If the cyrillus overcrowd the kristina then the kristina overcrowd the wilfrid. If something lambast the cyrillus then the cyrillus lambast the wilfrid. The wilfrid does not chase the wilfrid.", "logic": "\nnot Eternalise(wilfrid, cyrillus)\nEdifying(wilfrid)\nForte(wilfrid)\nSodden(wilfrid)\nnot Overcrowd(wilfrid, cyrillus)\nEternalise(kristina, wilfrid)\nEternalise(kristina, cyrillus)\nSodden(kristina)\nLambast(kristina, wilfrid)\nEternalise(cyrillus, wilfrid)\nnot Eternalise(cyrillus, kristina)\nUpraised(cyrillus)\nGuiltless(cyrillus)\nLambast(cyrillus, kristina)\nOvercrowd(cyrillus, wilfrid)\nforall x (Overcrowd(x, cyrillus) -> Overcrowd(cyrillus, kristina))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, wilfrid) and Lambast(x, kristina) -> Overcrowd(wilfrid, kristina))\nLambast(cyrillus, kristina) and Upraised(cyrillus) -> Overcrowd(kristina, cyrillus)\nLambast(cyrillus, wilfrid) -> Upraised(wilfrid)\nforall x (Lambast(x, cyrillus) -> Overcrowd(x, cyrillus))\nforall x (Overcrowd(x, wilfrid) -> Forte(x))\nOvercrowd(cyrillus, kristina) -> Overcrowd(kristina, wilfrid)\nforall x (Lambast(x, cyrillus) -> Lambast(cyrillus, wilfrid))\n\nnot Eternalise(wilfrid, wilfrid)\n\nnot Eternalise(wilfrid, wilfrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The rhianna does not chase the tressa. The rhianna is muffled. The rhianna is epimorphic. The rhianna is arrogant. The rhianna does not see the tressa. The maribeth alter the rhianna. The maribeth alter the tressa. The maribeth is arrogant. The maribeth fundraise the rhianna. The tressa alter the rhianna. The tressa does not chase the maribeth. The tressa is awkward. The tressa is contrived. The tressa fundraise the maribeth. The tressa wear the rhianna. If something wear the tressa then the tressa wear the maribeth. If something alter the rhianna and it fundraise the maribeth then the rhianna wear the maribeth. If the tressa fundraise the maribeth and the tressa is awkward then the maribeth wear the tressa. If the tressa fundraise the rhianna then the rhianna is awkward. If something fundraise the tressa then it wear the tressa. If something wear the rhianna then it is epimorphic. If the tressa wear the maribeth then the maribeth wear the rhianna. If something fundraise the tressa then the tressa fundraise the rhianna. The rhianna fundraise the rhianna.", "logic": "\nnot Alter(rhianna, tressa)\nMuffled(rhianna)\nEpimorphic(rhianna)\nArrogant(rhianna)\nnot Wear(rhianna, tressa)\nAlter(maribeth, rhianna)\nAlter(maribeth, tressa)\nArrogant(maribeth)\nFundraise(maribeth, rhianna)\nAlter(tressa, rhianna)\nnot Alter(tressa, maribeth)\nAwkward(tressa)\nContrived(tressa)\nFundraise(tressa, maribeth)\nWear(tressa, rhianna)\nforall x (Wear(x, tressa) -> Wear(tressa, maribeth))\nforall x (Alter(x, rhianna) and Fundraise(x, maribeth) -> Wear(rhianna, maribeth))\nFundraise(tressa, maribeth) and Awkward(tressa) -> Wear(maribeth, tressa)\nFundraise(tressa, rhianna) -> Awkward(rhianna)\nforall x (Fundraise(x, tressa) -> Wear(x, tressa))\nforall x (Wear(x, rhianna) -> Epimorphic(x))\nWear(tressa, maribeth) -> Wear(maribeth, rhianna)\nforall x (Fundraise(x, tressa) -> Fundraise(tressa, rhianna))\n\nFundraise(rhianna, rhianna)\n\nFundraise(rhianna, rhianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The jen does not chase the binny. The jen is forty. The jen is crazy. The jen is vacuous. The jen does not see the binny. The jackson mechanize the jen. The jackson mechanize the binny. The jackson is vacuous. The jackson talk the jen. The binny mechanize the jen. The binny does not chase the jackson. The binny is outbred. The binny is select. The binny talk the jackson. The binny powder the jen. If something powder the binny then the binny powder the jackson. If something mechanize the jen and it talk the jackson then the jen powder the jackson. If the binny talk the jackson and the binny is outbred then the jackson powder the binny. If the binny talk the jen then the jen is outbred. If something talk the binny then it powder the binny. If something powder the jen then it is crazy. If the binny powder the jackson then the jackson powder the jen. If something talk the binny then the binny talk the jen. The binny does not chase the binny.", "logic": "\nnot Mechanize(jen, binny)\nForty(jen)\nCrazy(jen)\nVacuous(jen)\nnot Powder(jen, binny)\nMechanize(jackson, jen)\nMechanize(jackson, binny)\nVacuous(jackson)\nTalk(jackson, jen)\nMechanize(binny, jen)\nnot Mechanize(binny, jackson)\nOutbred(binny)\nSelect(binny)\nTalk(binny, jackson)\nPowder(binny, jen)\nforall x (Powder(x, binny) -> Powder(binny, jackson))\nforall x (Mechanize(x, jen) and Talk(x, jackson) -> Powder(jen, jackson))\nTalk(binny, jackson) and Outbred(binny) -> Powder(jackson, binny)\nTalk(binny, jen) -> Outbred(jen)\nforall x (Talk(x, binny) -> Powder(x, binny))\nforall x (Powder(x, jen) -> Crazy(x))\nPowder(binny, jackson) -> Powder(jackson, jen)\nforall x (Talk(x, binny) -> Talk(binny, jen))\n\nnot Mechanize(binny, binny)\n\nnot Mechanize(binny, binny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The elnora does not chase the cary. The elnora is lucent. The elnora is pally. The elnora is torrential. The elnora does not see the cary. The lucas subvent the elnora. The lucas subvent the cary. The lucas is torrential. The lucas donate the elnora. The cary subvent the elnora. The cary does not chase the lucas. The cary is unrifled. The cary is eased. The cary donate the lucas. The cary sweeten the elnora. If something sweeten the cary then the cary sweeten the lucas. If something subvent the elnora and it donate the lucas then the elnora sweeten the lucas. If the cary donate the lucas and the cary is unrifled then the lucas sweeten the cary. If the cary donate the elnora then the elnora is unrifled. If something donate the cary then it sweeten the cary. If something sweeten the elnora then it is pally. If the cary sweeten the lucas then the lucas sweeten the elnora. If something donate the cary then the cary donate the elnora. The lucas sweeten the lucas.", "logic": "\nnot Subvent(elnora, cary)\nLucent(elnora)\nPally(elnora)\nTorrential(elnora)\nnot Sweeten(elnora, cary)\nSubvent(lucas, elnora)\nSubvent(lucas, cary)\nTorrential(lucas)\nDonate(lucas, elnora)\nSubvent(cary, elnora)\nnot Subvent(cary, lucas)\nUnrifled(cary)\nEased(cary)\nDonate(cary, lucas)\nSweeten(cary, elnora)\nforall x (Sweeten(x, cary) -> Sweeten(cary, lucas))\nforall x (Subvent(x, elnora) and Donate(x, lucas) -> Sweeten(elnora, lucas))\nDonate(cary, lucas) and Unrifled(cary) -> Sweeten(lucas, cary)\nDonate(cary, elnora) -> Unrifled(elnora)\nforall x (Donate(x, cary) -> Sweeten(x, cary))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, elnora) -> Pally(x))\nSweeten(cary, lucas) -> Sweeten(lucas, elnora)\nforall x (Donate(x, cary) -> Donate(cary, elnora))\n\nSweeten(lucas, lucas)\n\nSweeten(lucas, lucas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "Ardelis is swayback. Ardelis is flying. Ardelis is tripartite. Skyler is not tripartite. Skyler is oiled. Marylou is not outdoor. Marylou is tripartite. Gilda is flying. Gilda is tripartite. Gilda is mutable. If someone is oiled and not flying then they are swayback. If someone is outdoor then they are swayback. Kind people are outdoor. Cold, tripartite people are oiled. If someone is mitigable then they are oiled. If someone is swayback and not flying then they are not mutable. If Gilda is mitigable then Gilda is tripartite. Big, swayback people are tripartite. Marylou is not outdoor.", "logic": "\nSwayback(ardelis)\nFlying(ardelis)\nTripartite(ardelis)\nnot Tripartite(skyler)\nOiled(skyler)\nnot Outdoor(marylou)\nTripartite(marylou)\nFlying(gilda)\nTripartite(gilda)\nMutable(gilda)\nforall x (Oiled(x) and not Flying(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Outdoor(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Outdoor(x))\nforall x (Swayback(x) and Tripartite(x) -> Oiled(x))\nforall x (Mitigable(x) -> Oiled(x))\nforall x (Swayback(x) and not Flying(x) -> not Mutable(x))\nMitigable(gilda) -> Tripartite(gilda)\nforall x (Outdoor(x) and Swayback(x) -> Tripartite(x))\n\nnot Outdoor(marylou)\n\ntherefore not Outdoor(marylou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Giovanne is medullary. Giovanne is shrill. Giovanne is forgotten. Dyann is not forgotten. Dyann is hereditary. Morgana is not calceolate. Morgana is forgotten. Ted is shrill. Ted is forgotten. Ted is exaugural. If someone is hereditary and not shrill then they are medullary. If someone is calceolate then they are medullary. Kind people are calceolate. Cold, forgotten people are hereditary. If someone is superb then they are hereditary. If someone is medullary and not shrill then they are not exaugural. If Ted is superb then Ted is forgotten. Big, medullary people are forgotten. Ted is not shrill.", "logic": "\nMedullary(giovanne)\nShrill(giovanne)\nForgotten(giovanne)\nnot Forgotten(dyann)\nHereditary(dyann)\nnot Calceolate(morgana)\nForgotten(morgana)\nShrill(ted)\nForgotten(ted)\nExaugural(ted)\nforall x (Hereditary(x) and not Shrill(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) and Forgotten(x) -> Hereditary(x))\nforall x (Superb(x) -> Hereditary(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) and not Shrill(x) -> not Exaugural(x))\nSuperb(ted) -> Forgotten(ted)\nforall x (Calceolate(x) and Medullary(x) -> Forgotten(x))\n\nnot Shrill(ted)\n\ntherefore Shrill(ted)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Persis is fortuitous. Persis is epizoan. Persis is buttery. Ferdy is not buttery. Ferdy is frothy. May is not uncrannied. May is buttery. Amy is epizoan. Amy is buttery. Amy is transitory. If someone is frothy and not epizoan then they are fortuitous. If someone is uncrannied then they are fortuitous. Kind people are uncrannied. Cold, buttery people are frothy. If someone is bantoid then they are frothy. If someone is fortuitous and not epizoan then they are not transitory. If Amy is bantoid then Amy is buttery. Big, fortuitous people are buttery. Amy is uncrannied.", "logic": "\nFortuitous(persis)\nEpizoan(persis)\nButtery(persis)\nnot Buttery(ferdy)\nFrothy(ferdy)\nnot Uncrannied(may)\nButtery(may)\nEpizoan(amy)\nButtery(amy)\nTransitory(amy)\nforall x (Frothy(x) and not Epizoan(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Epizoan(x) -> Uncrannied(x))\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) and Buttery(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) and not Epizoan(x) -> not Transitory(x))\nBantoid(amy) -> Buttery(amy)\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) and Fortuitous(x) -> Buttery(x))\n\nUncrannied(amy)\n\nEpizoan(amy) and forall x (Epizoan(x) -> Uncrannied(x)) -> therefore Uncrannied(amy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Catha is pampering. Catha is intragroup. Catha is unloving. Miguel is not unloving. Miguel is crank. Vikkie is not earthbound. Vikkie is unloving. Annnora is intragroup. Annnora is unloving. Annnora is squiffy. If someone is crank and not intragroup then they are pampering. If someone is earthbound then they are pampering. Kind people are earthbound. Cold, unloving people are crank. If someone is doltish then they are crank. If someone is pampering and not intragroup then they are not squiffy. If Annnora is doltish then Annnora is unloving. Big, pampering people are unloving. Catha is not earthbound.", "logic": "\nPampering(catha)\nIntragroup(catha)\nUnloving(catha)\nnot Unloving(miguel)\nCrank(miguel)\nnot Earthbound(vikkie)\nUnloving(vikkie)\nIntragroup(annnora)\nUnloving(annnora)\nSquiffy(annnora)\nforall x (Crank(x) and not Intragroup(x) -> Pampering(x))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) -> Pampering(x))\nforall x (Intragroup(x) -> Earthbound(x))\nforall x (Pampering(x) and Unloving(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Pampering(x) and not Intragroup(x) -> not Squiffy(x))\nDoltish(annnora) -> Unloving(annnora)\nforall x (Earthbound(x) and Pampering(x) -> Unloving(x))\n\nnot Earthbound(catha)\n\nIntragroup(catha) and forall x (Intragroup(x) -> Earthbound(x)) -> therefore Earthbound(catha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Sven is splanchnic. Sven is vitrified. Sven is citric. Sibby is not citric. Sibby is unpermed. Carolina is not handsewn. Carolina is citric. Helga is vitrified. Helga is citric. Helga is clinical. If someone is unpermed and not vitrified then they are splanchnic. If someone is handsewn then they are splanchnic. Kind people are handsewn. Cold, citric people are unpermed. If someone is siberian then they are unpermed. If someone is splanchnic and not vitrified then they are not clinical. If Helga is siberian then Helga is citric. Big, splanchnic people are citric. Helga is splanchnic.", "logic": "\nSplanchnic(sven)\nVitrified(sven)\nCitric(sven)\nnot Citric(sibby)\nUnpermed(sibby)\nnot Handsewn(carolina)\nCitric(carolina)\nVitrified(helga)\nCitric(helga)\nClinical(helga)\nforall x (Unpermed(x) and not Vitrified(x) -> Splanchnic(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) -> Splanchnic(x))\nforall x (Vitrified(x) -> Handsewn(x))\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and Citric(x) -> Unpermed(x))\nforall x (Siberian(x) -> Unpermed(x))\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and not Vitrified(x) -> not Clinical(x))\nSiberian(helga) -> Citric(helga)\nforall x (Handsewn(x) and Splanchnic(x) -> Citric(x))\n\nSplanchnic(helga)\n\nVitrified(helga) and forall x (Vitrified(x) -> Handsewn(x)) -> therefore Handsewn(helga) Handsewn(helga) and forall x (Handsewn(x) -> Splanchnic(x)) -> therefore Splanchnic(helga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Welbie is concessive. Welbie is sweetened. Welbie is hebdomadal. Felicdad is not hebdomadal. Felicdad is unsatiated. Alisha is not tottering. Alisha is hebdomadal. Esma is sweetened. Esma is hebdomadal. Esma is nonviolent. If someone is unsatiated and not sweetened then they are concessive. If someone is tottering then they are concessive. Kind people are tottering. Cold, hebdomadal people are unsatiated. If someone is panegyric then they are unsatiated. If someone is concessive and not sweetened then they are not nonviolent. If Esma is panegyric then Esma is hebdomadal. Big, concessive people are hebdomadal. Esma is not concessive.", "logic": "\nConcessive(welbie)\nSweetened(welbie)\nHebdomadal(welbie)\nnot Hebdomadal(felicdad)\nUnsatiated(felicdad)\nnot Tottering(alisha)\nHebdomadal(alisha)\nSweetened(esma)\nHebdomadal(esma)\nNonviolent(esma)\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) and not Sweetened(x) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Tottering(x) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Sweetened(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Concessive(x) and Hebdomadal(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Panegyric(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Concessive(x) and not Sweetened(x) -> not Nonviolent(x))\nPanegyric(esma) -> Hebdomadal(esma)\nforall x (Tottering(x) and Concessive(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\n\nnot Concessive(esma)\n\nSweetened(esma) and forall x (Sweetened(x) -> Tottering(x)) -> therefore Tottering(esma) Tottering(esma) and forall x (Tottering(x) -> Concessive(x)) -> therefore Concessive(esma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Dosi is redbrick. Dosi is dalmatian. Dosi is frilly. Josi is not frilly. Josi is bichrome. Elroy is not storied. Elroy is frilly. Hew is dalmatian. Hew is frilly. Hew is stocky. If someone is bichrome and not dalmatian then they are redbrick. If someone is storied then they are redbrick. Kind people are storied. Cold, frilly people are bichrome. If someone is believable then they are bichrome. If someone is redbrick and not dalmatian then they are not stocky. If Hew is believable then Hew is frilly. Big, redbrick people are frilly. Hew is bichrome.", "logic": "\nRedbrick(dosi)\nDalmatian(dosi)\nFrilly(dosi)\nnot Frilly(josi)\nBichrome(josi)\nnot Storied(elroy)\nFrilly(elroy)\nDalmatian(hew)\nFrilly(hew)\nStocky(hew)\nforall x (Bichrome(x) and not Dalmatian(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Storied(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Dalmatian(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and Frilly(x) -> Bichrome(x))\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Bichrome(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and not Dalmatian(x) -> not Stocky(x))\nBelievable(hew) -> Frilly(hew)\nforall x (Storied(x) and Redbrick(x) -> Frilly(x))\n\nBichrome(hew)\n\nDalmatian(hew) and forall x (Dalmatian(x) -> Storied(x)) -> therefore Storied(hew) Storied(hew) and forall x (Storied(x) -> Redbrick(x)) -> therefore Redbrick(hew) Redbrick(hew) and Frilly(hew) and forall x (Redbrick(x) and Frilly(x) -> Bichrome(x)) -> therefore Bichrome(hew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Nickey is deciding. Nickey is roomy. Nickey is continuous. Fionna is not continuous. Fionna is addressed. Miles is not clumsy. Miles is continuous. Elna is roomy. Elna is continuous. Elna is inundated. If someone is addressed and not roomy then they are deciding. If someone is clumsy then they are deciding. Kind people are clumsy. Cold, continuous people are addressed. If someone is riming then they are addressed. If someone is deciding and not roomy then they are not inundated. If Elna is riming then Elna is continuous. Big, deciding people are continuous. Elna is not addressed.", "logic": "\nDeciding(nickey)\nRoomy(nickey)\nContinuous(nickey)\nnot Continuous(fionna)\nAddressed(fionna)\nnot Clumsy(miles)\nContinuous(miles)\nRoomy(elna)\nContinuous(elna)\nInundated(elna)\nforall x (Addressed(x) and not Roomy(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Roomy(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Continuous(x) -> Addressed(x))\nforall x (Riming(x) -> Addressed(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and not Roomy(x) -> not Inundated(x))\nRiming(elna) -> Continuous(elna)\nforall x (Clumsy(x) and Deciding(x) -> Continuous(x))\n\nnot Addressed(elna)\n\nRoomy(elna) and forall x (Roomy(x) -> Clumsy(x)) -> therefore Clumsy(elna) Clumsy(elna) and forall x (Clumsy(x) -> Deciding(x)) -> therefore Deciding(elna) Deciding(elna) and Continuous(elna) and forall x (Deciding(x) and Continuous(x) -> Addressed(x)) -> therefore Addressed(elna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Renaud is dead. Renaud is scapular. Renaud is pinchbeck. Oswell is not pinchbeck. Oswell is monotonic. Tonie is not mussy. Tonie is pinchbeck. Michale is scapular. Michale is pinchbeck. Michale is wimpy. If someone is monotonic and not scapular then they are dead. If someone is mussy then they are dead. Kind people are mussy. Cold, pinchbeck people are monotonic. If someone is walking then they are monotonic. If someone is dead and not scapular then they are not wimpy. If Michale is walking then Michale is pinchbeck. Big, dead people are pinchbeck. Tonie is not dead.", "logic": "\nDead(renaud)\nScapular(renaud)\nPinchbeck(renaud)\nnot Pinchbeck(oswell)\nMonotonic(oswell)\nnot Mussy(tonie)\nPinchbeck(tonie)\nScapular(michale)\nPinchbeck(michale)\nWimpy(michale)\nforall x (Monotonic(x) and not Scapular(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Mussy(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Scapular(x) -> Mussy(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) and Pinchbeck(x) -> Monotonic(x))\nforall x (Walking(x) -> Monotonic(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) and not Scapular(x) -> not Wimpy(x))\nWalking(michale) -> Pinchbeck(michale)\nforall x (Mussy(x) and Dead(x) -> Pinchbeck(x))\n\nnot Dead(tonie)\n\nforall x (Monotonic(x) and not Scapular(x) -> Dead(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Nathalia is spangled. Nathalia is olympic. Nathalia is idiomatic. Heidi is not idiomatic. Heidi is scalelike. Steve is not arsenious. Steve is idiomatic. Maisie is olympic. Maisie is idiomatic. Maisie is sunless. If someone is scalelike and not olympic then they are spangled. If someone is arsenious then they are spangled. Kind people are arsenious. Cold, idiomatic people are scalelike. If someone is grazed then they are scalelike. If someone is spangled and not olympic then they are not sunless. If Maisie is grazed then Maisie is idiomatic. Big, spangled people are idiomatic. Heidi is spangled.", "logic": "\nSpangled(nathalia)\nOlympic(nathalia)\nIdiomatic(nathalia)\nnot Idiomatic(heidi)\nScalelike(heidi)\nnot Arsenious(steve)\nIdiomatic(steve)\nOlympic(maisie)\nIdiomatic(maisie)\nSunless(maisie)\nforall x (Scalelike(x) and not Olympic(x) -> Spangled(x))\nforall x (Arsenious(x) -> Spangled(x))\nforall x (Olympic(x) -> Arsenious(x))\nforall x (Spangled(x) and Idiomatic(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Grazed(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Spangled(x) and not Olympic(x) -> not Sunless(x))\nGrazed(maisie) -> Idiomatic(maisie)\nforall x (Arsenious(x) and Spangled(x) -> Idiomatic(x))\n\nSpangled(heidi)\n\nforall x (Arsenious(x) -> Spangled(x)) <- forall x (Olympic(x) -> Arsenious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Barri is rotund. Barri is godly. Barri is amnic. Alica is not amnic. Alica is meatless. Nova is not straight. Nova is amnic. Ainslee is godly. Ainslee is amnic. Ainslee is concurrent. If someone is meatless and not godly then they are rotund. If someone is straight then they are rotund. Kind people are straight. Cold, amnic people are meatless. If someone is cupric then they are meatless. If someone is rotund and not godly then they are not concurrent. If Ainslee is cupric then Ainslee is amnic. Big, rotund people are amnic. Nova is not meatless.", "logic": "\nRotund(barri)\nGodly(barri)\nAmnic(barri)\nnot Amnic(alica)\nMeatless(alica)\nnot Straight(nova)\nAmnic(nova)\nGodly(ainslee)\nAmnic(ainslee)\nConcurrent(ainslee)\nforall x (Meatless(x) and not Godly(x) -> Rotund(x))\nforall x (Straight(x) -> Rotund(x))\nforall x (Godly(x) -> Straight(x))\nforall x (Rotund(x) and Amnic(x) -> Meatless(x))\nforall x (Cupric(x) -> Meatless(x))\nforall x (Rotund(x) and not Godly(x) -> not Concurrent(x))\nCupric(ainslee) -> Amnic(ainslee)\nforall x (Straight(x) and Rotund(x) -> Amnic(x))\n\nnot Meatless(nova)\n\nforall x (Rotund(x) and Amnic(x) -> Meatless(x)) <- forall x (Meatless(x) and not Godly(x) -> Rotund(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Butler is debonair. Butler is caruncular. Butler is expandable. Valeria is not expandable. Valeria is confiscate. Chloette is not aerophilic. Chloette is expandable. Louise is caruncular. Louise is expandable. Louise is spindly. If someone is confiscate and not caruncular then they are debonair. If someone is aerophilic then they are debonair. Kind people are aerophilic. Cold, expandable people are confiscate. If someone is perforated then they are confiscate. If someone is debonair and not caruncular then they are not spindly. If Louise is perforated then Louise is expandable. Big, debonair people are expandable. Valeria is aerophilic.", "logic": "\nDebonair(butler)\nCaruncular(butler)\nExpandable(butler)\nnot Expandable(valeria)\nConfiscate(valeria)\nnot Aerophilic(chloette)\nExpandable(chloette)\nCaruncular(louise)\nExpandable(louise)\nSpindly(louise)\nforall x (Confiscate(x) and not Caruncular(x) -> Debonair(x))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Debonair(x))\nforall x (Caruncular(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) and Expandable(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nforall x (Perforated(x) -> Confiscate(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) and not Caruncular(x) -> not Spindly(x))\nPerforated(louise) -> Expandable(louise)\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) and Debonair(x) -> Expandable(x))\n\nAerophilic(valeria)\n\nforall x (Caruncular(x) -> Aerophilic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Scotti is froward. Scotti is epidermal. Scotti is stolid. Fowler is not stolid. Fowler is vascular. Cati is not wondrous. Cati is stolid. Stefania is epidermal. Stefania is stolid. Stefania is jumentous. If someone is vascular and not epidermal then they are froward. If someone is wondrous then they are froward. Kind people are wondrous. Cold, stolid people are vascular. If someone is moribund then they are vascular. If someone is froward and not epidermal then they are not jumentous. If Stefania is moribund then Stefania is stolid. Big, froward people are stolid. Scotti is not moribund.", "logic": "\nFroward(scotti)\nEpidermal(scotti)\nStolid(scotti)\nnot Stolid(fowler)\nVascular(fowler)\nnot Wondrous(cati)\nStolid(cati)\nEpidermal(stefania)\nStolid(stefania)\nJumentous(stefania)\nforall x (Vascular(x) and not Epidermal(x) -> Froward(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Froward(x))\nforall x (Epidermal(x) -> Wondrous(x))\nforall x (Froward(x) and Stolid(x) -> Vascular(x))\nforall x (Moribund(x) -> Vascular(x))\nforall x (Froward(x) and not Epidermal(x) -> not Jumentous(x))\nMoribund(stefania) -> Stolid(stefania)\nforall x (Wondrous(x) and Froward(x) -> Stolid(x))\n\nnot Moribund(scotti)\n\nnot Moribund(scotti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Duffie is unactable. Duffie is staccato. Duffie is decent. Karlen is not decent. Karlen is bittie. Claudio is not ensuant. Claudio is decent. Dimitry is staccato. Dimitry is decent. Dimitry is clonic. If someone is bittie and not staccato then they are unactable. If someone is ensuant then they are unactable. Kind people are ensuant. Cold, decent people are bittie. If someone is impure then they are bittie. If someone is unactable and not staccato then they are not clonic. If Dimitry is impure then Dimitry is decent. Big, unactable people are decent. Karlen is impure.", "logic": "\nUnactable(duffie)\nStaccato(duffie)\nDecent(duffie)\nnot Decent(karlen)\nBittie(karlen)\nnot Ensuant(claudio)\nDecent(claudio)\nStaccato(dimitry)\nDecent(dimitry)\nClonic(dimitry)\nforall x (Bittie(x) and not Staccato(x) -> Unactable(x))\nforall x (Ensuant(x) -> Unactable(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> Ensuant(x))\nforall x (Unactable(x) and Decent(x) -> Bittie(x))\nforall x (Impure(x) -> Bittie(x))\nforall x (Unactable(x) and not Staccato(x) -> not Clonic(x))\nImpure(dimitry) -> Decent(dimitry)\nforall x (Ensuant(x) and Unactable(x) -> Decent(x))\n\nImpure(karlen)\n\nImpure(karlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Benson is drinkable. Benson is steady. Benson is biped. Maxfield is not biped. Maxfield is elvish. Genevra is not madagascan. Genevra is biped. Theodosia is steady. Theodosia is biped. Theodosia is demolished. If someone is elvish and not steady then they are drinkable. If someone is madagascan then they are drinkable. Kind people are madagascan. Cold, biped people are elvish. If someone is aramean then they are elvish. If someone is drinkable and not steady then they are not demolished. If Theodosia is aramean then Theodosia is biped. Big, drinkable people are biped. Theodosia is not aramean.", "logic": "\nDrinkable(benson)\nSteady(benson)\nBiped(benson)\nnot Biped(maxfield)\nElvish(maxfield)\nnot Madagascan(genevra)\nBiped(genevra)\nSteady(theodosia)\nBiped(theodosia)\nDemolished(theodosia)\nforall x (Elvish(x) and not Steady(x) -> Drinkable(x))\nforall x (Madagascan(x) -> Drinkable(x))\nforall x (Steady(x) -> Madagascan(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and Biped(x) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Aramean(x) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and not Steady(x) -> not Demolished(x))\nAramean(theodosia) -> Biped(theodosia)\nforall x (Madagascan(x) and Drinkable(x) -> Biped(x))\n\nnot Aramean(theodosia)\n\nnot Aramean(theodosia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Vail is moroccan. Vail is faint. Vail is stooped. Ajai is not stooped. Ajai is miniscule. Yaakov is not depleted. Yaakov is stooped. Cobbie is faint. Cobbie is stooped. Cobbie is preemptive. If someone is miniscule and not faint then they are moroccan. If someone is depleted then they are moroccan. Kind people are depleted. Cold, stooped people are miniscule. If someone is hyperfine then they are miniscule. If someone is moroccan and not faint then they are not preemptive. If Cobbie is hyperfine then Cobbie is stooped. Big, moroccan people are stooped. Ajai is faint.", "logic": "\nMoroccan(vail)\nFaint(vail)\nStooped(vail)\nnot Stooped(ajai)\nMiniscule(ajai)\nnot Depleted(yaakov)\nStooped(yaakov)\nFaint(cobbie)\nStooped(cobbie)\nPreemptive(cobbie)\nforall x (Miniscule(x) and not Faint(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Depleted(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) and Stooped(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nforall x (Hyperfine(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) and not Faint(x) -> not Preemptive(x))\nHyperfine(cobbie) -> Stooped(cobbie)\nforall x (Depleted(x) and Moroccan(x) -> Stooped(x))\n\nFaint(ajai)\n\nFaint(ajai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Raul is senatorial. Raul is speakable. Raul is hottish. All actionable people are senatorial. If someone is shadowy then they are bidentate. If someone is bidentate then they are shadowy. If Raul is senatorial and Raul is hottish then Raul is bidentate. If someone is senatorial and shadowy then they are actionable. All desperate, bidentate people are senatorial. Raul is speakable.", "logic": "\nSenatorial(raul)\nSpeakable(raul)\nHottish(raul)\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Bidentate(x))\nforall x (Bidentate(x) -> Shadowy(x))\nSenatorial(raul) and Hottish(raul) -> Bidentate(raul)\nforall x (Senatorial(x) and Shadowy(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Desperate(x) and Bidentate(x) -> Senatorial(x))\n\nSpeakable(raul)\n\ntherefore Speakable(raul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Madelin is specular. Madelin is shuddery. Madelin is fewer. All workaday people are specular. If someone is inoperable then they are gauntleted. If someone is gauntleted then they are inoperable. If Madelin is specular and Madelin is fewer then Madelin is gauntleted. If someone is specular and inoperable then they are workaday. All hewn, gauntleted people are specular. Madelin is not fewer.", "logic": "\nSpecular(madelin)\nShuddery(madelin)\nFewer(madelin)\nforall x (Workaday(x) -> Specular(x))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) -> Gauntleted(x))\nforall x (Gauntleted(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nSpecular(madelin) and Fewer(madelin) -> Gauntleted(madelin)\nforall x (Specular(x) and Inoperable(x) -> Workaday(x))\nforall x (Hewn(x) and Gauntleted(x) -> Specular(x))\n\nnot Fewer(madelin)\n\ntherefore Fewer(madelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Natalee is mancunian. Natalee is anorthic. Natalee is interested. All necked people are mancunian. If someone is besprent then they are radial. If someone is radial then they are besprent. If Natalee is mancunian and Natalee is interested then Natalee is radial. If someone is mancunian and besprent then they are necked. All edgeless, radial people are mancunian. Natalee is radial.", "logic": "\nMancunian(natalee)\nAnorthic(natalee)\nInterested(natalee)\nforall x (Necked(x) -> Mancunian(x))\nforall x (Besprent(x) -> Radial(x))\nforall x (Radial(x) -> Besprent(x))\nMancunian(natalee) and Interested(natalee) -> Radial(natalee)\nforall x (Mancunian(x) and Besprent(x) -> Necked(x))\nforall x (Edgeless(x) and Radial(x) -> Mancunian(x))\n\nRadial(natalee)\n\nMancunian(natalee) and Interested(natalee) and Mancunian(natalee) and Interested(natalee) -> Radial(natalee) -> therefore Radial(natalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Phaedra is inviolate. Phaedra is myopic. Phaedra is localised. All wimpy people are inviolate. If someone is caitiff then they are grueling. If someone is grueling then they are caitiff. If Phaedra is inviolate and Phaedra is localised then Phaedra is grueling. If someone is inviolate and caitiff then they are wimpy. All foetal, grueling people are inviolate. Phaedra is not grueling.", "logic": "\nInviolate(phaedra)\nMyopic(phaedra)\nLocalised(phaedra)\nforall x (Wimpy(x) -> Inviolate(x))\nforall x (Caitiff(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Grueling(x) -> Caitiff(x))\nInviolate(phaedra) and Localised(phaedra) -> Grueling(phaedra)\nforall x (Inviolate(x) and Caitiff(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nforall x (Foetal(x) and Grueling(x) -> Inviolate(x))\n\nnot Grueling(phaedra)\n\nInviolate(phaedra) and Localised(phaedra) and Inviolate(phaedra) and Localised(phaedra) -> Grueling(phaedra) -> therefore Grueling(phaedra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Ann is laggard. Ann is feathery. Ann is moist. All uttermost people are laggard. If someone is decorated then they are activated. If someone is activated then they are decorated. If Ann is laggard and Ann is moist then Ann is activated. If someone is laggard and decorated then they are uttermost. All docile, activated people are laggard. Ann is decorated.", "logic": "\nLaggard(ann)\nFeathery(ann)\nMoist(ann)\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Laggard(x))\nforall x (Decorated(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Decorated(x))\nLaggard(ann) and Moist(ann) -> Activated(ann)\nforall x (Laggard(x) and Decorated(x) -> Uttermost(x))\nforall x (Docile(x) and Activated(x) -> Laggard(x))\n\nDecorated(ann)\n\nLaggard(ann) and Moist(ann) and Laggard(ann) and Moist(ann) -> Activated(ann) -> therefore Activated(ann) Activated(ann) and forall x (Activated(x) -> Decorated(x)) -> therefore Decorated(ann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Arlie is infeasible. Arlie is unnatural. Arlie is alike. All atonic people are infeasible. If someone is beatified then they are avid. If someone is avid then they are beatified. If Arlie is infeasible and Arlie is alike then Arlie is avid. If someone is infeasible and beatified then they are atonic. All unshapely, avid people are infeasible. Arlie is not beatified.", "logic": "\nInfeasible(arlie)\nUnnatural(arlie)\nAlike(arlie)\nforall x (Atonic(x) -> Infeasible(x))\nforall x (Beatified(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Beatified(x))\nInfeasible(arlie) and Alike(arlie) -> Avid(arlie)\nforall x (Infeasible(x) and Beatified(x) -> Atonic(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) and Avid(x) -> Infeasible(x))\n\nnot Beatified(arlie)\n\nInfeasible(arlie) and Alike(arlie) and Infeasible(arlie) and Alike(arlie) -> Avid(arlie) -> therefore Avid(arlie) Avid(arlie) and forall x (Avid(x) -> Beatified(x)) -> therefore Beatified(arlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Vallie is swazi. Vallie is oiled. Vallie is dour. All alvine people are swazi. If someone is great then they are choleraic. If someone is choleraic then they are great. If Vallie is swazi and Vallie is dour then Vallie is choleraic. If someone is swazi and great then they are alvine. All papistic, choleraic people are swazi. Vallie is alvine.", "logic": "\nSwazi(vallie)\nOiled(vallie)\nDour(vallie)\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Great(x) -> Choleraic(x))\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Great(x))\nSwazi(vallie) and Dour(vallie) -> Choleraic(vallie)\nforall x (Swazi(x) and Great(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Papistic(x) and Choleraic(x) -> Swazi(x))\n\nAlvine(vallie)\n\nSwazi(vallie) and Dour(vallie) and Swazi(vallie) and Dour(vallie) -> Choleraic(vallie) -> therefore Choleraic(vallie) Choleraic(vallie) and forall x (Choleraic(x) -> Great(x)) -> therefore Great(vallie) Swazi(vallie) and Great(vallie) and forall x (Swazi(x) and Great(x) -> Alvine(x)) -> therefore Alvine(vallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Anneliese is unartistic. Anneliese is earnest. Anneliese is same. All sovereign people are unartistic. If someone is fungible then they are escaped. If someone is escaped then they are fungible. If Anneliese is unartistic and Anneliese is same then Anneliese is escaped. If someone is unartistic and fungible then they are sovereign. All fastened, escaped people are unartistic. Anneliese is not sovereign.", "logic": "\nUnartistic(anneliese)\nEarnest(anneliese)\nSame(anneliese)\nforall x (Sovereign(x) -> Unartistic(x))\nforall x (Fungible(x) -> Escaped(x))\nforall x (Escaped(x) -> Fungible(x))\nUnartistic(anneliese) and Same(anneliese) -> Escaped(anneliese)\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and Fungible(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Fastened(x) and Escaped(x) -> Unartistic(x))\n\nnot Sovereign(anneliese)\n\nUnartistic(anneliese) and Same(anneliese) and Unartistic(anneliese) and Same(anneliese) -> Escaped(anneliese) -> therefore Escaped(anneliese) Escaped(anneliese) and forall x (Escaped(x) -> Fungible(x)) -> therefore Fungible(anneliese) Unartistic(anneliese) and Fungible(anneliese) and forall x (Unartistic(x) and Fungible(x) -> Sovereign(x)) -> therefore Sovereign(anneliese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Kylie is unplumbed. Clarisa is not polish. Olwen is harrowing. Querida is not iterative. All comestible, sterling people are unplumbed. All polish people are unplumbed. If someone is impassive and not harrowing then they are iterative. Kind, sterling people are iterative. If someone is unplumbed then they are iterative. All harrowing people are not comestible. If someone is impassive then they are sterling. Kind, iterative people are impassive. Kylie is unplumbed.", "logic": "\nUnplumbed(kylie)\nnot Polish(clarisa)\nHarrowing(olwen)\nnot Iterative(querida)\nforall x (Comestible(x) and Sterling(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Impassive(x) and not Harrowing(x) -> Iterative(x))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) and Sterling(x) -> Iterative(x))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) -> Iterative(x))\nforall x (Harrowing(x) -> not Comestible(x))\nforall x (Impassive(x) -> Sterling(x))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) and Iterative(x) -> Impassive(x))\n\nUnplumbed(kylie)\n\ntherefore Unplumbed(kylie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Zorah is truculent. Montague is not arabian. Charissa is dutiable. Elspeth is not unextended. All apetalous, arteriolar people are truculent. All arabian people are truculent. If someone is concordant and not dutiable then they are unextended. Kind, arteriolar people are unextended. If someone is truculent then they are unextended. All dutiable people are not apetalous. If someone is concordant then they are arteriolar. Kind, unextended people are concordant. Montague is arabian.", "logic": "\nTruculent(zorah)\nnot Arabian(montague)\nDutiable(charissa)\nnot Unextended(elspeth)\nforall x (Apetalous(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Arabian(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Concordant(x) and not Dutiable(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Dutiable(x) -> not Apetalous(x))\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) and Unextended(x) -> Concordant(x))\n\nArabian(montague)\n\ntherefore not Arabian(montague)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Wenona is georgian. Kala is not cadent. Ediva is mawkish. Sonnie is not unemphatic. All isogonic, cislunar people are georgian. All cadent people are georgian. If someone is singing and not mawkish then they are unemphatic. Kind, cislunar people are unemphatic. If someone is georgian then they are unemphatic. All mawkish people are not isogonic. If someone is singing then they are cislunar. Kind, unemphatic people are singing. Ediva is not isogonic.", "logic": "\nGeorgian(wenona)\nnot Cadent(kala)\nMawkish(ediva)\nnot Unemphatic(sonnie)\nforall x (Isogonic(x) and Cislunar(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Cadent(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Singing(x) and not Mawkish(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) and Cislunar(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) -> not Isogonic(x))\nforall x (Singing(x) -> Cislunar(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) and Unemphatic(x) -> Singing(x))\n\nnot Isogonic(ediva)\n\nMawkish(ediva) and forall x (Mawkish(x) -> not Isogonic(x)) -> therefore not Isogonic(ediva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Nikolia is paltry. Malory is not nationwide. Felicle is utility. Glorianna is not frail. All pharisaic, prophetic people are paltry. All nationwide people are paltry. If someone is noticeable and not utility then they are frail. Kind, prophetic people are frail. If someone is paltry then they are frail. All utility people are not pharisaic. If someone is noticeable then they are prophetic. Kind, frail people are noticeable. Felicle is pharisaic.", "logic": "\nPaltry(nikolia)\nnot Nationwide(malory)\nUtility(felicle)\nnot Frail(glorianna)\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) and Prophetic(x) -> Paltry(x))\nforall x (Nationwide(x) -> Paltry(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) and not Utility(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Paltry(x) and Prophetic(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Paltry(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Utility(x) -> not Pharisaic(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Prophetic(x))\nforall x (Paltry(x) and Frail(x) -> Noticeable(x))\n\nPharisaic(felicle)\n\nUtility(felicle) and forall x (Utility(x) -> not Pharisaic(x)) -> therefore not Pharisaic(felicle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Rustin is wolflike. Ely is not refractory. Boyce is repressive. Margy is not chlorotic. All waggish, sculptured people are wolflike. All refractory people are wolflike. If someone is prototypal and not repressive then they are chlorotic. Kind, sculptured people are chlorotic. If someone is wolflike then they are chlorotic. All repressive people are not waggish. If someone is prototypal then they are sculptured. Kind, chlorotic people are prototypal. Rustin is prototypal.", "logic": "\nWolflike(rustin)\nnot Refractory(ely)\nRepressive(boyce)\nnot Chlorotic(margy)\nforall x (Waggish(x) and Sculptured(x) -> Wolflike(x))\nforall x (Refractory(x) -> Wolflike(x))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) and not Repressive(x) -> Chlorotic(x))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) and Sculptured(x) -> Chlorotic(x))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) -> Chlorotic(x))\nforall x (Repressive(x) -> not Waggish(x))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) and Chlorotic(x) -> Prototypal(x))\n\nPrototypal(rustin)\n\nWolflike(rustin) and forall x (Wolflike(x) -> Chlorotic(x)) -> therefore Chlorotic(rustin) Wolflike(rustin) and Chlorotic(rustin) and forall x (Wolflike(x) and Chlorotic(x) -> Prototypal(x)) -> therefore Prototypal(rustin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Coriss is abducent. Judy is not cashed. James is aortal. Beverlie is not emphatic. All soured, isosmotic people are abducent. All cashed people are abducent. If someone is synchronal and not aortal then they are emphatic. Kind, isosmotic people are emphatic. If someone is abducent then they are emphatic. All aortal people are not soured. If someone is synchronal then they are isosmotic. Kind, emphatic people are synchronal. Coriss is not synchronal.", "logic": "\nAbducent(coriss)\nnot Cashed(judy)\nAortal(james)\nnot Emphatic(beverlie)\nforall x (Soured(x) and Isosmotic(x) -> Abducent(x))\nforall x (Cashed(x) -> Abducent(x))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) and not Aortal(x) -> Emphatic(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) and Isosmotic(x) -> Emphatic(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) -> Emphatic(x))\nforall x (Aortal(x) -> not Soured(x))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Isosmotic(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) and Emphatic(x) -> Synchronal(x))\n\nnot Synchronal(coriss)\n\nAbducent(coriss) and forall x (Abducent(x) -> Emphatic(x)) -> therefore Emphatic(coriss) Abducent(coriss) and Emphatic(coriss) and forall x (Abducent(x) and Emphatic(x) -> Synchronal(x)) -> therefore Synchronal(coriss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Deborah is finite. Gaspar is not dank. Kenneth is flatulent. Doug is not ethereal. All recurved, dislikable people are finite. All dank people are finite. If someone is assurgent and not flatulent then they are ethereal. Kind, dislikable people are ethereal. If someone is finite then they are ethereal. All flatulent people are not recurved. If someone is assurgent then they are dislikable. Kind, ethereal people are assurgent. Deborah is dislikable.", "logic": "\nFinite(deborah)\nnot Dank(gaspar)\nFlatulent(kenneth)\nnot Ethereal(doug)\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Dislikable(x) -> Finite(x))\nforall x (Dank(x) -> Finite(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) and not Flatulent(x) -> Ethereal(x))\nforall x (Finite(x) and Dislikable(x) -> Ethereal(x))\nforall x (Finite(x) -> Ethereal(x))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) -> not Recurved(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Finite(x) and Ethereal(x) -> Assurgent(x))\n\nDislikable(deborah)\n\nFinite(deborah) and forall x (Finite(x) -> Ethereal(x)) -> therefore Ethereal(deborah) Finite(deborah) and Ethereal(deborah) and forall x (Finite(x) and Ethereal(x) -> Assurgent(x)) -> therefore Assurgent(deborah) Assurgent(deborah) and forall x (Assurgent(x) -> Dislikable(x)) -> therefore Dislikable(deborah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Ainsley is optimal. Adelle is not unfeeling. Anallise is federal. Adiana is not aryan. All foetal, webby people are optimal. All unfeeling people are optimal. If someone is grand and not federal then they are aryan. Kind, webby people are aryan. If someone is optimal then they are aryan. All federal people are not foetal. If someone is grand then they are webby. Kind, aryan people are grand. Ainsley is not webby.", "logic": "\nOptimal(ainsley)\nnot Unfeeling(adelle)\nFederal(anallise)\nnot Aryan(adiana)\nforall x (Foetal(x) and Webby(x) -> Optimal(x))\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) -> Optimal(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) and not Federal(x) -> Aryan(x))\nforall x (Optimal(x) and Webby(x) -> Aryan(x))\nforall x (Optimal(x) -> Aryan(x))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> not Foetal(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Webby(x))\nforall x (Optimal(x) and Aryan(x) -> Grand(x))\n\nnot Webby(ainsley)\n\nOptimal(ainsley) and forall x (Optimal(x) -> Aryan(x)) -> therefore Aryan(ainsley) Optimal(ainsley) and Aryan(ainsley) and forall x (Optimal(x) and Aryan(x) -> Grand(x)) -> therefore Grand(ainsley) Grand(ainsley) and forall x (Grand(x) -> Webby(x)) -> therefore Webby(ainsley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Viki is bastardly. Lacey is not depictive. Byram is subhuman. Hiram is not jilted. All adherent, choosy people are bastardly. All depictive people are bastardly. If someone is geodetic and not subhuman then they are jilted. Kind, choosy people are jilted. If someone is bastardly then they are jilted. All subhuman people are not adherent. If someone is geodetic then they are choosy. Kind, jilted people are geodetic. Byram is not geodetic.", "logic": "\nBastardly(viki)\nnot Depictive(lacey)\nSubhuman(byram)\nnot Jilted(hiram)\nforall x (Adherent(x) and Choosy(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Depictive(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) and not Subhuman(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Choosy(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Subhuman(x) -> not Adherent(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> Choosy(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Jilted(x) -> Geodetic(x))\n\nnot Geodetic(byram)\n\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Jilted(x) -> Geodetic(x)) <- forall x (Adherent(x) and Choosy(x) -> Bastardly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Putnam is dusky. Cayla is not stringy. Graham is vinaceous. Muriel is not putrid. All undecided, hindermost people are dusky. All stringy people are dusky. If someone is conjugated and not vinaceous then they are putrid. Kind, hindermost people are putrid. If someone is dusky then they are putrid. All vinaceous people are not undecided. If someone is conjugated then they are hindermost. Kind, putrid people are conjugated. Graham is putrid.", "logic": "\nDusky(putnam)\nnot Stringy(cayla)\nVinaceous(graham)\nnot Putrid(muriel)\nforall x (Undecided(x) and Hindermost(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Stringy(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and not Vinaceous(x) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Hindermost(x) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> not Undecided(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Hindermost(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Putrid(x) -> Conjugated(x))\n\nPutrid(graham)\n\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Hindermost(x) -> Putrid(x)) <- forall x (Undecided(x) and Hindermost(x) -> Dusky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Rosalie is borderline. Gian is not plumping. Westley is sulphuric. Marylynne is not unrelieved. All acoustic, thumbed people are borderline. All plumping people are borderline. If someone is leaflike and not sulphuric then they are unrelieved. Kind, thumbed people are unrelieved. If someone is borderline then they are unrelieved. All sulphuric people are not acoustic. If someone is leaflike then they are thumbed. Kind, unrelieved people are leaflike. Marylynne is not leaflike.", "logic": "\nBorderline(rosalie)\nnot Plumping(gian)\nSulphuric(westley)\nnot Unrelieved(marylynne)\nforall x (Acoustic(x) and Thumbed(x) -> Borderline(x))\nforall x (Plumping(x) -> Borderline(x))\nforall x (Leaflike(x) and not Sulphuric(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Borderline(x) and Thumbed(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Borderline(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> not Acoustic(x))\nforall x (Leaflike(x) -> Thumbed(x))\nforall x (Borderline(x) and Unrelieved(x) -> Leaflike(x))\n\nnot Leaflike(marylynne)\n\nforall x (Borderline(x) and Unrelieved(x) -> Leaflike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Raquel is maniacal. Tootsie is not ungreased. Reinhold is semilunar. Tiffani is not untreated. All embossed, vapourous people are maniacal. All ungreased people are maniacal. If someone is thespian and not semilunar then they are untreated. Kind, vapourous people are untreated. If someone is maniacal then they are untreated. All semilunar people are not embossed. If someone is thespian then they are vapourous. Kind, untreated people are thespian. Tootsie is untreated.", "logic": "\nManiacal(raquel)\nnot Ungreased(tootsie)\nSemilunar(reinhold)\nnot Untreated(tiffani)\nforall x (Embossed(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Maniacal(x))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> Maniacal(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) and not Semilunar(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> not Embossed(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Maniacal(x) and Untreated(x) -> Thespian(x))\n\nUntreated(tootsie)\n\nforall x (Maniacal(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Untreated(x)) <- forall x (Embossed(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Maniacal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Chelsae is spiraling. Yolanda is not apodous. Tandi is jolting. Marillin is not thai. All amort, rancid people are spiraling. All apodous people are spiraling. If someone is cypriote and not jolting then they are thai. Kind, rancid people are thai. If someone is spiraling then they are thai. All jolting people are not amort. If someone is cypriote then they are rancid. Kind, thai people are cypriote. Marillin is not apodous.", "logic": "\nSpiraling(chelsae)\nnot Apodous(yolanda)\nJolting(tandi)\nnot Thai(marillin)\nforall x (Amort(x) and Rancid(x) -> Spiraling(x))\nforall x (Apodous(x) -> Spiraling(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) and not Jolting(x) -> Thai(x))\nforall x (Spiraling(x) and Rancid(x) -> Thai(x))\nforall x (Spiraling(x) -> Thai(x))\nforall x (Jolting(x) -> not Amort(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) -> Rancid(x))\nforall x (Spiraling(x) and Thai(x) -> Cypriote(x))\n\nnot Apodous(marillin)\n\nnot Apodous(marillin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Natasha is mouselike. Dell is not shot. Cordula is godlike. Marielle is not photogenic. All palladian, darkened people are mouselike. All shot people are mouselike. If someone is weedy and not godlike then they are photogenic. Kind, darkened people are photogenic. If someone is mouselike then they are photogenic. All godlike people are not palladian. If someone is weedy then they are darkened. Kind, photogenic people are weedy. Cordula is shot.", "logic": "\nMouselike(natasha)\nnot Shot(dell)\nGodlike(cordula)\nnot Photogenic(marielle)\nforall x (Palladian(x) and Darkened(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Shot(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) and not Godlike(x) -> Photogenic(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) and Darkened(x) -> Photogenic(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Photogenic(x))\nforall x (Godlike(x) -> not Palladian(x))\nforall x (Weedy(x) -> Darkened(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) and Photogenic(x) -> Weedy(x))\n\nShot(cordula)\n\nShot(cordula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Cheryl is ribald. Armando is not sapless. Webster is markovian. Tiffanie is not alluring. All upcurved, crisp people are ribald. All sapless people are ribald. If someone is abominable and not markovian then they are alluring. Kind, crisp people are alluring. If someone is ribald then they are alluring. All markovian people are not upcurved. If someone is abominable then they are crisp. Kind, alluring people are abominable. Cheryl is not upcurved.", "logic": "\nRibald(cheryl)\nnot Sapless(armando)\nMarkovian(webster)\nnot Alluring(tiffanie)\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Crisp(x) -> Ribald(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Ribald(x))\nforall x (Abominable(x) and not Markovian(x) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Ribald(x) and Crisp(x) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Ribald(x) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> not Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Abominable(x) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Ribald(x) and Alluring(x) -> Abominable(x))\n\nnot Upcurved(cheryl)\n\nnot Upcurved(cheryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Nomi is folding. Fulvia is not unwashed. Leopold is taupe. Kikelia is not tasteful. All atomistic, khaki people are folding. All unwashed people are folding. If someone is renowned and not taupe then they are tasteful. Kind, khaki people are tasteful. If someone is folding then they are tasteful. All taupe people are not atomistic. If someone is renowned then they are khaki. Kind, tasteful people are renowned. Nomi is unwashed.", "logic": "\nFolding(nomi)\nnot Unwashed(fulvia)\nTaupe(leopold)\nnot Tasteful(kikelia)\nforall x (Atomistic(x) and Khaki(x) -> Folding(x))\nforall x (Unwashed(x) -> Folding(x))\nforall x (Renowned(x) and not Taupe(x) -> Tasteful(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) and Khaki(x) -> Tasteful(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Tasteful(x))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> not Atomistic(x))\nforall x (Renowned(x) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) and Tasteful(x) -> Renowned(x))\n\nUnwashed(nomi)\n\nUnwashed(nomi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Vere is dipylon. Kynthia is chinchy. If Vere is viselike then Vere is spinal. All humourless people are viselike. If someone is dipylon then they are humourless. Vere is dipylon.", "logic": "\nDipylon(vere)\nChinchy(kynthia)\nViselike(vere) -> Spinal(vere)\nforall x (Humourless(x) -> Viselike(x))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) -> Humourless(x))\n\nDipylon(vere)\n\ntherefore Dipylon(vere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Adora is maoist. Tania is mullioned. If Adora is abusive then Adora is xxiii. All trochaic people are abusive. If someone is maoist then they are trochaic. Adora is not maoist.", "logic": "\nMaoist(adora)\nMullioned(tania)\nAbusive(adora) -> Xxiii(adora)\nforall x (Trochaic(x) -> Abusive(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> Trochaic(x))\n\nnot Maoist(adora)\n\ntherefore Maoist(adora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Nonah is monetary. Flossi is tanzanian. If Nonah is fleshly then Nonah is pinnatifid. All standing people are fleshly. If someone is monetary then they are standing. Nonah is standing.", "logic": "\nMonetary(nonah)\nTanzanian(flossi)\nFleshly(nonah) -> Pinnatifid(nonah)\nforall x (Standing(x) -> Fleshly(x))\nforall x (Monetary(x) -> Standing(x))\n\nStanding(nonah)\n\nMonetary(nonah) and forall x (Monetary(x) -> Standing(x)) -> therefore Standing(nonah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Xavier is fair. Merle is noxious. If Xavier is bearded then Xavier is unsatiated. All blinded people are bearded. If someone is fair then they are blinded. Xavier is not blinded.", "logic": "\nFair(xavier)\nNoxious(merle)\nBearded(xavier) -> Unsatiated(xavier)\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Fair(x) -> Blinded(x))\n\nnot Blinded(xavier)\n\nFair(xavier) and forall x (Fair(x) -> Blinded(x)) -> therefore Blinded(xavier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Debby is overhanded. Bertha is flip. If Debby is orbicular then Debby is fingered. All opposable people are orbicular. If someone is overhanded then they are opposable. Debby is orbicular.", "logic": "\nOverhanded(debby)\nFlip(bertha)\nOrbicular(debby) -> Fingered(debby)\nforall x (Opposable(x) -> Orbicular(x))\nforall x (Overhanded(x) -> Opposable(x))\n\nOrbicular(debby)\n\nOverhanded(debby) and forall x (Overhanded(x) -> Opposable(x)) -> therefore Opposable(debby) Opposable(debby) and forall x (Opposable(x) -> Orbicular(x)) -> therefore Orbicular(debby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Myrtia is obvious. Krissy is trochaic. If Myrtia is congolese then Myrtia is determined. All carsick people are congolese. If someone is obvious then they are carsick. Myrtia is not congolese.", "logic": "\nObvious(myrtia)\nTrochaic(krissy)\nCongolese(myrtia) -> Determined(myrtia)\nforall x (Carsick(x) -> Congolese(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Carsick(x))\n\nnot Congolese(myrtia)\n\nObvious(myrtia) and forall x (Obvious(x) -> Carsick(x)) -> therefore Carsick(myrtia) Carsick(myrtia) and forall x (Carsick(x) -> Congolese(x)) -> therefore Congolese(myrtia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Carmen is tribal. Christin is bivalent. If Carmen is botonee then Carmen is underfed. All blebby people are botonee. If someone is tribal then they are blebby. Carmen is underfed.", "logic": "\nTribal(carmen)\nBivalent(christin)\nBotonee(carmen) -> Underfed(carmen)\nforall x (Blebby(x) -> Botonee(x))\nforall x (Tribal(x) -> Blebby(x))\n\nUnderfed(carmen)\n\nTribal(carmen) and forall x (Tribal(x) -> Blebby(x)) -> therefore Blebby(carmen) Blebby(carmen) and forall x (Blebby(x) -> Botonee(x)) -> therefore Botonee(carmen) Botonee(carmen) and Botonee(carmen) -> Underfed(carmen) -> therefore Underfed(carmen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Wanda is camp. Maisey is serologic. If Wanda is quixotic then Wanda is cheesy. All banging people are quixotic. If someone is camp then they are banging. Wanda is not cheesy.", "logic": "\nCamp(wanda)\nSerologic(maisey)\nQuixotic(wanda) -> Cheesy(wanda)\nforall x (Banging(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Camp(x) -> Banging(x))\n\nnot Cheesy(wanda)\n\nCamp(wanda) and forall x (Camp(x) -> Banging(x)) -> therefore Banging(wanda) Banging(wanda) and forall x (Banging(x) -> Quixotic(x)) -> therefore Quixotic(wanda) Quixotic(wanda) and Quixotic(wanda) -> Cheesy(wanda) -> therefore Cheesy(wanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Burt is vowellike. Josie is limp. If Burt is shipshape then Burt is sweltry. All improvable people are shipshape. If someone is vowellike then they are improvable. Josie is not shipshape.", "logic": "\nVowellike(burt)\nLimp(josie)\nShipshape(burt) -> Sweltry(burt)\nforall x (Improvable(x) -> Shipshape(x))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Improvable(x))\n\nnot Shipshape(josie)\n\nforall x (Improvable(x) -> Shipshape(x)) <- forall x (Vowellike(x) -> Improvable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Friedrick is canned. Ethelin is quaggy. If Friedrick is uruguayan then Friedrick is springy. All medial people are uruguayan. If someone is canned then they are medial. Ethelin is medial.", "logic": "\nCanned(friedrick)\nQuaggy(ethelin)\nUruguayan(friedrick) -> Springy(friedrick)\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Uruguayan(x))\nforall x (Canned(x) -> Medial(x))\n\nMedial(ethelin)\n\nforall x (Canned(x) -> Medial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Heath is hardline. Virge is mistreated. If Heath is motorless then Heath is inviting. All contiguous people are motorless. If someone is hardline then they are contiguous. Virge is not hardline.", "logic": "\nHardline(heath)\nMistreated(virge)\nMotorless(heath) -> Inviting(heath)\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Motorless(x))\nforall x (Hardline(x) -> Contiguous(x))\n\nnot Hardline(virge)\n\nnot Hardline(virge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Virgina is evidenced. Hugo is salvadoran. If Virgina is insentient then Virgina is numerable. All sheer people are insentient. If someone is evidenced then they are sheer. Hugo is numerable.", "logic": "\nEvidenced(virgina)\nSalvadoran(hugo)\nInsentient(virgina) -> Numerable(virgina)\nforall x (Sheer(x) -> Insentient(x))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) -> Sheer(x))\n\nNumerable(hugo)\n\nNumerable(hugo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Gillan is appraising. Ulrica is tarsal. If Gillan is cuddlesome then Gillan is forehanded. All clean people are cuddlesome. If someone is appraising then they are clean. Ulrica is not quiet.", "logic": "\nAppraising(gillan)\nTarsal(ulrica)\nCuddlesome(gillan) -> Forehanded(gillan)\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nforall x (Appraising(x) -> Clean(x))\n\nnot Quiet(ulrica)\n\nnot Quiet(ulrica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Nancy is cuspate. Cicely is lenten. If Nancy is actinic then Nancy is uniovulate. All cubiform people are actinic. If someone is cuspate then they are cubiform. Nancy is lenten.", "logic": "\nCuspate(nancy)\nLenten(cicely)\nActinic(nancy) -> Uniovulate(nancy)\nforall x (Cubiform(x) -> Actinic(x))\nforall x (Cuspate(x) -> Cubiform(x))\n\nLenten(nancy)\n\nLenten(nancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Kitti is coalescent. Lucie is arminian. If Kitti is unstarred then Kitti is stripped. All diatomic people are unstarred. If someone is coalescent then they are diatomic. Kitti is not red.", "logic": "\nCoalescent(kitti)\nArminian(lucie)\nUnstarred(kitti) -> Stripped(kitti)\nforall x (Diatomic(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Coalescent(x) -> Diatomic(x))\n\nnot Red(kitti)\n\nnot Red(kitti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Fancy is starboard. Danya is expressed. If Fancy is isomorphic then Fancy is keyed. All climatic people are isomorphic. If someone is starboard then they are climatic. Fancy is quiet.", "logic": "\nStarboard(fancy)\nExpressed(danya)\nIsomorphic(fancy) -> Keyed(fancy)\nforall x (Climatic(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Starboard(x) -> Climatic(x))\n\nQuiet(fancy)\n\nQuiet(fancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Arleta is repellant. Arleta is untasted. Horace is narcotised. Horace is not acarpous. Horace is doddering. Gene is untasted. Gene is doddering. If something is narcotised then it is not acarpous. If Arleta is unimposing then Arleta is narcotised. If something is unimposing then it is narcotised. If Horace is acarpous then Horace is not unimposing. Nice things are doddering. If something is acarpous then it is doddering. Quiet things are unimposing. If Horace is not unimposing then Horace is doddering. Arleta is untasted.", "logic": "\nRepellant(arleta)\nUntasted(arleta)\nNarcotised(horace)\nnot Acarpous(horace)\nDoddering(horace)\nUntasted(gene)\nDoddering(gene)\nforall x (Narcotised(x) -> not Acarpous(x))\nUnimposing(arleta) -> Narcotised(arleta)\nforall x (Unimposing(x) -> Narcotised(x))\nAcarpous(horace) -> not Unimposing(horace)\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> Doddering(x))\nforall x (Acarpous(x) -> Doddering(x))\nforall x (Untasted(x) -> Unimposing(x))\nnot Unimposing(horace) -> Doddering(horace)\n\nUntasted(arleta)\n\ntherefore Untasted(arleta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Joy is azotic. Joy is controlled. Meggie is euphonical. Meggie is not starry. Meggie is bidentate. Beckie is controlled. Beckie is bidentate. If something is euphonical then it is not starry. If Joy is surging then Joy is euphonical. If something is surging then it is euphonical. If Meggie is starry then Meggie is not surging. Nice things are bidentate. If something is starry then it is bidentate. Quiet things are surging. If Meggie is not surging then Meggie is bidentate. Beckie is not controlled.", "logic": "\nAzotic(joy)\nControlled(joy)\nEuphonical(meggie)\nnot Starry(meggie)\nBidentate(meggie)\nControlled(beckie)\nBidentate(beckie)\nforall x (Euphonical(x) -> not Starry(x))\nSurging(joy) -> Euphonical(joy)\nforall x (Surging(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nStarry(meggie) -> not Surging(meggie)\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Bidentate(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Bidentate(x))\nforall x (Controlled(x) -> Surging(x))\nnot Surging(meggie) -> Bidentate(meggie)\n\nnot Controlled(beckie)\n\ntherefore Controlled(beckie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Kordula is ascendable. Kordula is neandertal. Germaine is simian. Germaine is not broke. Germaine is frightened. Janelle is neandertal. Janelle is frightened. If something is simian then it is not broke. If Kordula is admirable then Kordula is simian. If something is admirable then it is simian. If Germaine is broke then Germaine is not admirable. Nice things are frightened. If something is broke then it is frightened. Quiet things are admirable. If Germaine is not admirable then Germaine is frightened. Kordula is admirable.", "logic": "\nAscendable(kordula)\nNeandertal(kordula)\nSimian(germaine)\nnot Broke(germaine)\nFrightened(germaine)\nNeandertal(janelle)\nFrightened(janelle)\nforall x (Simian(x) -> not Broke(x))\nAdmirable(kordula) -> Simian(kordula)\nforall x (Admirable(x) -> Simian(x))\nBroke(germaine) -> not Admirable(germaine)\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> Admirable(x))\nnot Admirable(germaine) -> Frightened(germaine)\n\nAdmirable(kordula)\n\nNeandertal(kordula) and forall x (Neandertal(x) -> Admirable(x)) -> therefore Admirable(kordula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Sonnie is twiglike. Sonnie is mannered. Malka is biconvex. Malka is not aculeate. Malka is satellite. Misty is mannered. Misty is satellite. If something is biconvex then it is not aculeate. If Sonnie is blinking then Sonnie is biconvex. If something is blinking then it is biconvex. If Malka is aculeate then Malka is not blinking. Nice things are satellite. If something is aculeate then it is satellite. Quiet things are blinking. If Malka is not blinking then Malka is satellite. Misty is not blinking.", "logic": "\nTwiglike(sonnie)\nMannered(sonnie)\nBiconvex(malka)\nnot Aculeate(malka)\nSatellite(malka)\nMannered(misty)\nSatellite(misty)\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> not Aculeate(x))\nBlinking(sonnie) -> Biconvex(sonnie)\nforall x (Blinking(x) -> Biconvex(x))\nAculeate(malka) -> not Blinking(malka)\nforall x (Aculeate(x) -> Satellite(x))\nforall x (Aculeate(x) -> Satellite(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) -> Blinking(x))\nnot Blinking(malka) -> Satellite(malka)\n\nnot Blinking(misty)\n\nMannered(misty) and forall x (Mannered(x) -> Blinking(x)) -> therefore Blinking(misty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Hewet is dreadful. Hewet is throwback. Giff is nubby. Giff is not modifiable. Giff is kempt. Zabrina is throwback. Zabrina is kempt. If something is nubby then it is not modifiable. If Hewet is bacillary then Hewet is nubby. If something is bacillary then it is nubby. If Giff is modifiable then Giff is not bacillary. Nice things are kempt. If something is modifiable then it is kempt. Quiet things are bacillary. If Giff is not bacillary then Giff is kempt. Hewet is nubby.", "logic": "\nDreadful(hewet)\nThrowback(hewet)\nNubby(giff)\nnot Modifiable(giff)\nKempt(giff)\nThrowback(zabrina)\nKempt(zabrina)\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> not Modifiable(x))\nBacillary(hewet) -> Nubby(hewet)\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Nubby(x))\nModifiable(giff) -> not Bacillary(giff)\nforall x (Modifiable(x) -> Kempt(x))\nforall x (Modifiable(x) -> Kempt(x))\nforall x (Throwback(x) -> Bacillary(x))\nnot Bacillary(giff) -> Kempt(giff)\n\nNubby(hewet)\n\nThrowback(hewet) and forall x (Throwback(x) -> Bacillary(x)) -> therefore Bacillary(hewet) Bacillary(hewet) and Bacillary(hewet) -> Nubby(hewet) -> therefore Nubby(hewet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Caesar is blear. Caesar is sporting. Ceciley is flukey. Ceciley is not kayoed. Ceciley is cauline. Mateo is sporting. Mateo is cauline. If something is flukey then it is not kayoed. If Caesar is mercurous then Caesar is flukey. If something is mercurous then it is flukey. If Ceciley is kayoed then Ceciley is not mercurous. Nice things are cauline. If something is kayoed then it is cauline. Quiet things are mercurous. If Ceciley is not mercurous then Ceciley is cauline. Mateo is not flukey.", "logic": "\nBlear(caesar)\nSporting(caesar)\nFlukey(ceciley)\nnot Kayoed(ceciley)\nCauline(ceciley)\nSporting(mateo)\nCauline(mateo)\nforall x (Flukey(x) -> not Kayoed(x))\nMercurous(caesar) -> Flukey(caesar)\nforall x (Mercurous(x) -> Flukey(x))\nKayoed(ceciley) -> not Mercurous(ceciley)\nforall x (Kayoed(x) -> Cauline(x))\nforall x (Kayoed(x) -> Cauline(x))\nforall x (Sporting(x) -> Mercurous(x))\nnot Mercurous(ceciley) -> Cauline(ceciley)\n\nnot Flukey(mateo)\n\nSporting(mateo) and forall x (Sporting(x) -> Mercurous(x)) -> therefore Mercurous(mateo) Mercurous(mateo) and forall x (Mercurous(x) -> Flukey(x)) -> therefore Flukey(mateo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Linnea is estimable. Linnea is opaque. Barr is rotational. Barr is not farcical. Barr is chaste. Herschel is opaque. Herschel is chaste. If something is rotational then it is not farcical. If Linnea is xlviii then Linnea is rotational. If something is xlviii then it is rotational. If Barr is farcical then Barr is not xlviii. Nice things are chaste. If something is farcical then it is chaste. Quiet things are xlviii. If Barr is not xlviii then Barr is chaste. Herschel is not farcical.", "logic": "\nEstimable(linnea)\nOpaque(linnea)\nRotational(barr)\nnot Farcical(barr)\nChaste(barr)\nOpaque(herschel)\nChaste(herschel)\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> not Farcical(x))\nXlviii(linnea) -> Rotational(linnea)\nforall x (Xlviii(x) -> Rotational(x))\nFarcical(barr) -> not Xlviii(barr)\nforall x (Farcical(x) -> Chaste(x))\nforall x (Farcical(x) -> Chaste(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) -> Xlviii(x))\nnot Xlviii(barr) -> Chaste(barr)\n\nnot Farcical(herschel)\n\nOpaque(herschel) and forall x (Opaque(x) -> Xlviii(x)) -> therefore Xlviii(herschel) Xlviii(herschel) and forall x (Xlviii(x) -> Rotational(x)) -> therefore Rotational(herschel) Rotational(herschel) and forall x (Rotational(x) -> not Farcical(x)) -> therefore not Farcical(herschel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Hillery is cheliceral. Hillery is standard. Ransom is alluvial. Ransom is not homey. Ransom is stomatal. Monah is standard. Monah is stomatal. If something is alluvial then it is not homey. If Hillery is chitinous then Hillery is alluvial. If something is chitinous then it is alluvial. If Ransom is homey then Ransom is not chitinous. Nice things are stomatal. If something is homey then it is stomatal. Quiet things are chitinous. If Ransom is not chitinous then Ransom is stomatal. Hillery is homey.", "logic": "\nCheliceral(hillery)\nStandard(hillery)\nAlluvial(ransom)\nnot Homey(ransom)\nStomatal(ransom)\nStandard(monah)\nStomatal(monah)\nforall x (Alluvial(x) -> not Homey(x))\nChitinous(hillery) -> Alluvial(hillery)\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> Alluvial(x))\nHomey(ransom) -> not Chitinous(ransom)\nforall x (Homey(x) -> Stomatal(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) -> Stomatal(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) -> Chitinous(x))\nnot Chitinous(ransom) -> Stomatal(ransom)\n\nHomey(hillery)\n\nStandard(hillery) and forall x (Standard(x) -> Chitinous(x)) -> therefore Chitinous(hillery) Chitinous(hillery) and Chitinous(hillery) -> Alluvial(hillery) -> therefore Alluvial(hillery) Alluvial(hillery) and forall x (Alluvial(x) -> not Homey(x)) -> therefore not Homey(hillery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Timmie is jeweled. Timmie is vile. Hakeem is isthmian. Hakeem is not lame. Hakeem is entrenched. Kevyn is vile. Kevyn is entrenched. If something is isthmian then it is not lame. If Timmie is roseate then Timmie is isthmian. If something is roseate then it is isthmian. If Hakeem is lame then Hakeem is not roseate. Nice things are entrenched. If something is lame then it is entrenched. Quiet things are roseate. If Hakeem is not roseate then Hakeem is entrenched. Hakeem is not roseate.", "logic": "\nJeweled(timmie)\nVile(timmie)\nIsthmian(hakeem)\nnot Lame(hakeem)\nEntrenched(hakeem)\nVile(kevyn)\nEntrenched(kevyn)\nforall x (Isthmian(x) -> not Lame(x))\nRoseate(timmie) -> Isthmian(timmie)\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nLame(hakeem) -> not Roseate(hakeem)\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Roseate(x))\nnot Roseate(hakeem) -> Entrenched(hakeem)\n\nnot Roseate(hakeem)\n\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Roseate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Moreen is fibrinous. Moreen is pectoral. Kassey is ethiopian. Kassey is not geographic. Kassey is snoopy. Kimberlyn is pectoral. Kimberlyn is snoopy. If something is ethiopian then it is not geographic. If Moreen is natal then Moreen is ethiopian. If something is natal then it is ethiopian. If Kassey is geographic then Kassey is not natal. Nice things are snoopy. If something is geographic then it is snoopy. Quiet things are natal. If Kassey is not natal then Kassey is snoopy. Moreen is snoopy.", "logic": "\nFibrinous(moreen)\nPectoral(moreen)\nEthiopian(kassey)\nnot Geographic(kassey)\nSnoopy(kassey)\nPectoral(kimberlyn)\nSnoopy(kimberlyn)\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> not Geographic(x))\nNatal(moreen) -> Ethiopian(moreen)\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\nGeographic(kassey) -> not Natal(kassey)\nforall x (Geographic(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nforall x (Geographic(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Natal(x))\nnot Natal(kassey) -> Snoopy(kassey)\n\nSnoopy(moreen)\n\nforall x (Geographic(x) -> Snoopy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Gasper is exothermal. Gasper is ecdemic. Waite is buffoonish. Waite is not prevenient. Waite is bilobate. Timothea is ecdemic. Timothea is bilobate. If something is buffoonish then it is not prevenient. If Gasper is stroppy then Gasper is buffoonish. If something is stroppy then it is buffoonish. If Waite is prevenient then Waite is not stroppy. Nice things are bilobate. If something is prevenient then it is bilobate. Quiet things are stroppy. If Waite is not stroppy then Waite is bilobate. Timothea is not green.", "logic": "\nExothermal(gasper)\nEcdemic(gasper)\nBuffoonish(waite)\nnot Prevenient(waite)\nBilobate(waite)\nEcdemic(timothea)\nBilobate(timothea)\nforall x (Buffoonish(x) -> not Prevenient(x))\nStroppy(gasper) -> Buffoonish(gasper)\nforall x (Stroppy(x) -> Buffoonish(x))\nPrevenient(waite) -> not Stroppy(waite)\nforall x (Prevenient(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Prevenient(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Ecdemic(x) -> Stroppy(x))\nnot Stroppy(waite) -> Bilobate(waite)\n\nnot Green(timothea)\n\nnot Green(timothea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Glori is sartorial. Glori is hearable. Bishop is myocardial. Bishop is not turbulent. Bishop is furred. Carleigh is hearable. Carleigh is furred. If something is myocardial then it is not turbulent. If Glori is rancid then Glori is myocardial. If something is rancid then it is myocardial. If Bishop is turbulent then Bishop is not rancid. Nice things are furred. If something is turbulent then it is furred. Quiet things are rancid. If Bishop is not rancid then Bishop is furred. Bishop is green.", "logic": "\nSartorial(glori)\nHearable(glori)\nMyocardial(bishop)\nnot Turbulent(bishop)\nFurred(bishop)\nHearable(carleigh)\nFurred(carleigh)\nforall x (Myocardial(x) -> not Turbulent(x))\nRancid(glori) -> Myocardial(glori)\nforall x (Rancid(x) -> Myocardial(x))\nTurbulent(bishop) -> not Rancid(bishop)\nforall x (Turbulent(x) -> Furred(x))\nforall x (Turbulent(x) -> Furred(x))\nforall x (Hearable(x) -> Rancid(x))\nnot Rancid(bishop) -> Furred(bishop)\n\nGreen(bishop)\n\nGreen(bishop) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Otes is divisional. Otes is untwisted. Roxie is shady. Roxie is not overstated. Roxie is pneumatic. Sol is untwisted. Sol is pneumatic. If something is shady then it is not overstated. If Otes is unstinted then Otes is shady. If something is unstinted then it is shady. If Roxie is overstated then Roxie is not unstinted. Nice things are pneumatic. If something is overstated then it is pneumatic. Quiet things are unstinted. If Roxie is not unstinted then Roxie is pneumatic. Roxie is not divisional.", "logic": "\nDivisional(otes)\nUntwisted(otes)\nShady(roxie)\nnot Overstated(roxie)\nPneumatic(roxie)\nUntwisted(sol)\nPneumatic(sol)\nforall x (Shady(x) -> not Overstated(x))\nUnstinted(otes) -> Shady(otes)\nforall x (Unstinted(x) -> Shady(x))\nOverstated(roxie) -> not Unstinted(roxie)\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Unstinted(x))\nnot Unstinted(roxie) -> Pneumatic(roxie)\n\nnot Divisional(roxie)\n\nnot Divisional(roxie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Valaria is sable. Valaria is standpat. Hogan is patented. Hogan is not rejective. Hogan is emerging. Pip is standpat. Pip is emerging. If something is patented then it is not rejective. If Valaria is fictile then Valaria is patented. If something is fictile then it is patented. If Hogan is rejective then Hogan is not fictile. Nice things are emerging. If something is rejective then it is emerging. Quiet things are fictile. If Hogan is not fictile then Hogan is emerging. Hogan is standpat.", "logic": "\nSable(valaria)\nStandpat(valaria)\nPatented(hogan)\nnot Rejective(hogan)\nEmerging(hogan)\nStandpat(pip)\nEmerging(pip)\nforall x (Patented(x) -> not Rejective(x))\nFictile(valaria) -> Patented(valaria)\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Patented(x))\nRejective(hogan) -> not Fictile(hogan)\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Emerging(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Emerging(x))\nforall x (Standpat(x) -> Fictile(x))\nnot Fictile(hogan) -> Emerging(hogan)\n\nStandpat(hogan)\n\nStandpat(hogan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Lonny is greyish. Lonny is articled. Tonnie is nonaged. Tonnie is not fourhanded. Tonnie is emerging. Marion is articled. Marion is emerging. If something is nonaged then it is not fourhanded. If Lonny is analogue then Lonny is nonaged. If something is analogue then it is nonaged. If Tonnie is fourhanded then Tonnie is not analogue. Nice things are emerging. If something is fourhanded then it is emerging. Quiet things are analogue. If Tonnie is not analogue then Tonnie is emerging. Lonny is not green.", "logic": "\nGreyish(lonny)\nArticled(lonny)\nNonaged(tonnie)\nnot Fourhanded(tonnie)\nEmerging(tonnie)\nArticled(marion)\nEmerging(marion)\nforall x (Nonaged(x) -> not Fourhanded(x))\nAnalogue(lonny) -> Nonaged(lonny)\nforall x (Analogue(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nFourhanded(tonnie) -> not Analogue(tonnie)\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) -> Emerging(x))\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) -> Emerging(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Analogue(x))\nnot Analogue(tonnie) -> Emerging(tonnie)\n\nnot Green(lonny)\n\nnot Green(lonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Lyndel is xciv. Lyndel is honduran. Delora is subsidised. Delora is not tetchy. Delora is proximate. Nelson is honduran. Nelson is proximate. If something is subsidised then it is not tetchy. If Lyndel is unseen then Lyndel is subsidised. If something is unseen then it is subsidised. If Delora is tetchy then Delora is not unseen. Nice things are proximate. If something is tetchy then it is proximate. Quiet things are unseen. If Delora is not unseen then Delora is proximate. Nelson is xciv.", "logic": "\nXciv(lyndel)\nHonduran(lyndel)\nSubsidised(delora)\nnot Tetchy(delora)\nProximate(delora)\nHonduran(nelson)\nProximate(nelson)\nforall x (Subsidised(x) -> not Tetchy(x))\nUnseen(lyndel) -> Subsidised(lyndel)\nforall x (Unseen(x) -> Subsidised(x))\nTetchy(delora) -> not Unseen(delora)\nforall x (Tetchy(x) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Tetchy(x) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Honduran(x) -> Unseen(x))\nnot Unseen(delora) -> Proximate(delora)\n\nXciv(nelson)\n\nXciv(nelson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Meggan is thumping. Gertruda is wigless. Kind, appressed people are slipping. All wigless, moroccan people are appressed. If someone is wigless and variolous then they are moroccan. If someone is wigless then they are moroccan. All moroccan, appressed people are tight. Furry people are thumping. Meggan is thumping.", "logic": "\nThumping(meggan)\nWigless(gertruda)\nforall x (Tight(x) and Appressed(x) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Wigless(x) and Moroccan(x) -> Appressed(x))\nforall x (Wigless(x) and Variolous(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Wigless(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) and Appressed(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Variolous(x) -> Thumping(x))\n\nThumping(meggan)\n\ntherefore Thumping(meggan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Alejandra is narcotized. Andrzej is aliform. Kind, chiliastic people are collegiate. All aliform, somnolent people are chiliastic. If someone is aliform and anaerobic then they are somnolent. If someone is aliform then they are somnolent. All somnolent, chiliastic people are waxing. Furry people are narcotized. Andrzej is not aliform.", "logic": "\nNarcotized(alejandra)\nAliform(andrzej)\nforall x (Waxing(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Collegiate(x))\nforall x (Aliform(x) and Somnolent(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\nforall x (Aliform(x) and Anaerobic(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nforall x (Somnolent(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Waxing(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Narcotized(x))\n\nnot Aliform(andrzej)\n\ntherefore Aliform(andrzej)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Quinton is maplelike. Bree is sarawakian. Kind, xcvii people are squiggly. All sarawakian, ecologic people are xcvii. If someone is sarawakian and drugless then they are ecologic. If someone is sarawakian then they are ecologic. All ecologic, xcvii people are truthful. Furry people are maplelike. Bree is ecologic.", "logic": "\nMaplelike(quinton)\nSarawakian(bree)\nforall x (Truthful(x) and Xcvii(x) -> Squiggly(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and Ecologic(x) -> Xcvii(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and Drugless(x) -> Ecologic(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Ecologic(x))\nforall x (Ecologic(x) and Xcvii(x) -> Truthful(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Maplelike(x))\n\nEcologic(bree)\n\nSarawakian(bree) and forall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Ecologic(x)) -> therefore Ecologic(bree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Mair is steepish. Carolann is atavistic. Kind, unfurrowed people are preserved. All atavistic, exaugural people are unfurrowed. If someone is atavistic and suborbital then they are exaugural. If someone is atavistic then they are exaugural. All exaugural, unfurrowed people are blamable. Furry people are steepish. Carolann is not exaugural.", "logic": "\nSteepish(mair)\nAtavistic(carolann)\nforall x (Blamable(x) and Unfurrowed(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Atavistic(x) and Exaugural(x) -> Unfurrowed(x))\nforall x (Atavistic(x) and Suborbital(x) -> Exaugural(x))\nforall x (Atavistic(x) -> Exaugural(x))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) and Unfurrowed(x) -> Blamable(x))\nforall x (Suborbital(x) -> Steepish(x))\n\nnot Exaugural(carolann)\n\nAtavistic(carolann) and forall x (Atavistic(x) -> Exaugural(x)) -> therefore Exaugural(carolann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Niall is verbalized. Sigfrid is abasic. Kind, vocative people are begrimed. All abasic, punctured people are vocative. If someone is abasic and individual then they are punctured. If someone is abasic then they are punctured. All punctured, vocative people are prefrontal. Furry people are verbalized. Sigfrid is vocative.", "logic": "\nVerbalized(niall)\nAbasic(sigfrid)\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) and Vocative(x) -> Begrimed(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) and Punctured(x) -> Vocative(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) and Individual(x) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Punctured(x) and Vocative(x) -> Prefrontal(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) -> Verbalized(x))\n\nVocative(sigfrid)\n\nAbasic(sigfrid) and forall x (Abasic(x) -> Punctured(x)) -> therefore Punctured(sigfrid) Abasic(sigfrid) and Punctured(sigfrid) and forall x (Abasic(x) and Punctured(x) -> Vocative(x)) -> therefore Vocative(sigfrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Titus is exploitive. Emmit is auxetic. Kind, uppish people are kooky. All auxetic, assistive people are uppish. If someone is auxetic and pappose then they are assistive. If someone is auxetic then they are assistive. All assistive, uppish people are subatomic. Furry people are exploitive. Emmit is not uppish.", "logic": "\nExploitive(titus)\nAuxetic(emmit)\nforall x (Subatomic(x) and Uppish(x) -> Kooky(x))\nforall x (Auxetic(x) and Assistive(x) -> Uppish(x))\nforall x (Auxetic(x) and Pappose(x) -> Assistive(x))\nforall x (Auxetic(x) -> Assistive(x))\nforall x (Assistive(x) and Uppish(x) -> Subatomic(x))\nforall x (Pappose(x) -> Exploitive(x))\n\nnot Uppish(emmit)\n\nAuxetic(emmit) and forall x (Auxetic(x) -> Assistive(x)) -> therefore Assistive(emmit) Auxetic(emmit) and Assistive(emmit) and forall x (Auxetic(x) and Assistive(x) -> Uppish(x)) -> therefore Uppish(emmit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Norbert is oxidised. Timmie is clashing. Kind, desirous people are peopled. All clashing, strict people are desirous. If someone is clashing and nitrous then they are strict. If someone is clashing then they are strict. All strict, desirous people are epicurean. Furry people are oxidised. Timmie is epicurean.", "logic": "\nOxidised(norbert)\nClashing(timmie)\nforall x (Epicurean(x) and Desirous(x) -> Peopled(x))\nforall x (Clashing(x) and Strict(x) -> Desirous(x))\nforall x (Clashing(x) and Nitrous(x) -> Strict(x))\nforall x (Clashing(x) -> Strict(x))\nforall x (Strict(x) and Desirous(x) -> Epicurean(x))\nforall x (Nitrous(x) -> Oxidised(x))\n\nEpicurean(timmie)\n\nClashing(timmie) and forall x (Clashing(x) -> Strict(x)) -> therefore Strict(timmie) Clashing(timmie) and forall x (Clashing(x) -> Strict(x)) -> therefore Strict(timmie) Clashing(timmie) and Strict(timmie) and forall x (Clashing(x) and Strict(x) -> Desirous(x)) -> therefore Desirous(timmie) Strict(timmie) and Desirous(timmie) and forall x (Strict(x) and Desirous(x) -> Epicurean(x)) -> therefore Epicurean(timmie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Korney is techy. Elbertine is volant. Kind, figured people are cranial. All volant, misty people are figured. If someone is volant and fouled then they are misty. If someone is volant then they are misty. All misty, figured people are summative. Furry people are techy. Elbertine is not summative.", "logic": "\nTechy(korney)\nVolant(elbertine)\nforall x (Summative(x) and Figured(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Volant(x) and Misty(x) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Volant(x) and Fouled(x) -> Misty(x))\nforall x (Volant(x) -> Misty(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) and Figured(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) -> Techy(x))\n\nnot Summative(elbertine)\n\nVolant(elbertine) and forall x (Volant(x) -> Misty(x)) -> therefore Misty(elbertine) Volant(elbertine) and forall x (Volant(x) -> Misty(x)) -> therefore Misty(elbertine) Volant(elbertine) and Misty(elbertine) and forall x (Volant(x) and Misty(x) -> Figured(x)) -> therefore Figured(elbertine) Misty(elbertine) and Figured(elbertine) and forall x (Misty(x) and Figured(x) -> Summative(x)) -> therefore Summative(elbertine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Judith is fanatic. Saba is diplomatic. Kind, callow people are vested. All diplomatic, extravert people are callow. If someone is diplomatic and grainy then they are extravert. If someone is diplomatic then they are extravert. All extravert, callow people are altaic. Furry people are fanatic. Judith is not altaic.", "logic": "\nFanatic(judith)\nDiplomatic(saba)\nforall x (Altaic(x) and Callow(x) -> Vested(x))\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) and Extravert(x) -> Callow(x))\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) and Grainy(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Extravert(x) and Callow(x) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Grainy(x) -> Fanatic(x))\n\nnot Altaic(judith)\n\nforall x (Extravert(x) and Callow(x) -> Altaic(x)) <- forall x (Diplomatic(x) and Grainy(x) -> Extravert(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Travis is caecal. Maggi is centesimal. Kind, sufferable people are acerb. All centesimal, aneroid people are sufferable. If someone is centesimal and crotchety then they are aneroid. If someone is centesimal then they are aneroid. All aneroid, sufferable people are jugular. Furry people are caecal. Travis is acerb.", "logic": "\nCaecal(travis)\nCentesimal(maggi)\nforall x (Jugular(x) and Sufferable(x) -> Acerb(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and Aneroid(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and Crotchety(x) -> Aneroid(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> Aneroid(x))\nforall x (Aneroid(x) and Sufferable(x) -> Jugular(x))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) -> Caecal(x))\n\nAcerb(travis)\n\nforall x (Jugular(x) and Sufferable(x) -> Acerb(x)) <- forall x (Centesimal(x) and Aneroid(x) -> Sufferable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Rhianon is belemnitic. Demetris is monthly. Kind, drawn people are nuptial. All monthly, hick people are drawn. If someone is monthly and extremist then they are hick. If someone is monthly then they are hick. All hick, drawn people are unvendible. Furry people are belemnitic. Rhianon is not drawn.", "logic": "\nBelemnitic(rhianon)\nMonthly(demetris)\nforall x (Unvendible(x) and Drawn(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) and Hick(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) and Extremist(x) -> Hick(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) -> Hick(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) and Drawn(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Extremist(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\n\nnot Drawn(rhianon)\n\nforall x (Monthly(x) and Hick(x) -> Drawn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Giff is numerous. Rana is visible. Kind, glorious people are unspaced. All visible, honied people are glorious. If someone is visible and flexuous then they are honied. If someone is visible then they are honied. All honied, glorious people are flatbottom. Furry people are numerous. Rana is numerous.", "logic": "\nNumerous(giff)\nVisible(rana)\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) and Glorious(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nforall x (Visible(x) and Honied(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Visible(x) and Flexuous(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Visible(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Honied(x) and Glorious(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\nforall x (Flexuous(x) -> Numerous(x))\n\nNumerous(rana)\n\nforall x (Flexuous(x) -> Numerous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Zena is ciliary. Aguinaldo is midweekly. Kind, agonising people are unsuasible. All midweekly, unexampled people are agonising. If someone is midweekly and minimalist then they are unexampled. If someone is midweekly then they are unexampled. All unexampled, agonising people are tensed. Furry people are ciliary. Zena is not minimalist.", "logic": "\nCiliary(zena)\nMidweekly(aguinaldo)\nforall x (Tensed(x) and Agonising(x) -> Unsuasible(x))\nforall x (Midweekly(x) and Unexampled(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Midweekly(x) and Minimalist(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Midweekly(x) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and Agonising(x) -> Tensed(x))\nforall x (Minimalist(x) -> Ciliary(x))\n\nnot Minimalist(zena)\n\nnot Minimalist(zena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Kirstyn is perirhinal. Kamillah is subdued. Kind, unschooled people are fortified. All subdued, sobersided people are unschooled. If someone is subdued and binomial then they are sobersided. If someone is subdued then they are sobersided. All sobersided, unschooled people are unripe. Furry people are perirhinal. Kirstyn is subdued.", "logic": "\nPerirhinal(kirstyn)\nSubdued(kamillah)\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Unschooled(x) -> Fortified(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) and Sobersided(x) -> Unschooled(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) and Binomial(x) -> Sobersided(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Sobersided(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) and Unschooled(x) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Binomial(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\n\nSubdued(kirstyn)\n\nSubdued(kirstyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Ariela is untwisted. Ariela is siberian. Ariela is matured. Ariela is limiting. Leia is presumable. Leia is essential. Leia is matured. Verina is presumable. Verina is essential. Verina is siberian. Verina is matured. Verina is limiting. Kassandra is presumable. Kassandra is matured. Kassandra is blonde. If Leia is blonde and Leia is presumable then Leia is siberian. All essential people are limiting. Quiet, limiting people are blonde. Verina is presumable.", "logic": "\nUntwisted(ariela)\nSiberian(ariela)\nMatured(ariela)\nLimiting(ariela)\nPresumable(leia)\nEssential(leia)\nMatured(leia)\nPresumable(verina)\nEssential(verina)\nSiberian(verina)\nMatured(verina)\nLimiting(verina)\nPresumable(kassandra)\nMatured(kassandra)\nBlonde(kassandra)\nBlonde(leia) and Presumable(leia) -> Siberian(leia)\nforall x (Essential(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Matured(x) and Limiting(x) -> Blonde(x))\n\nPresumable(verina)\n\ntherefore Presumable(verina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Leontyne is consistent. Leontyne is stunted. Leontyne is tormented. Leontyne is dismissive. Vera is tasty. Vera is syrian. Vera is tormented. Claudelle is tasty. Claudelle is syrian. Claudelle is stunted. Claudelle is tormented. Claudelle is dismissive. Cody is tasty. Cody is tormented. Cody is unfaceted. If Vera is unfaceted and Vera is tasty then Vera is stunted. All syrian people are dismissive. Quiet, dismissive people are unfaceted. Vera is not tormented.", "logic": "\nConsistent(leontyne)\nStunted(leontyne)\nTormented(leontyne)\nDismissive(leontyne)\nTasty(vera)\nSyrian(vera)\nTormented(vera)\nTasty(claudelle)\nSyrian(claudelle)\nStunted(claudelle)\nTormented(claudelle)\nDismissive(claudelle)\nTasty(cody)\nTormented(cody)\nUnfaceted(cody)\nUnfaceted(vera) and Tasty(vera) -> Stunted(vera)\nforall x (Syrian(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Tormented(x) and Dismissive(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\n\nnot Tormented(vera)\n\ntherefore Tormented(vera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Adella is thankless. Adella is algometric. Adella is discalced. Adella is heatable. Alane is unmarred. Alane is dyspneal. Alane is discalced. Dody is unmarred. Dody is dyspneal. Dody is algometric. Dody is discalced. Dody is heatable. Kevina is unmarred. Kevina is discalced. Kevina is parlous. If Alane is parlous and Alane is unmarred then Alane is algometric. All dyspneal people are heatable. Quiet, heatable people are parlous. Dody is parlous.", "logic": "\nThankless(adella)\nAlgometric(adella)\nDiscalced(adella)\nHeatable(adella)\nUnmarred(alane)\nDyspneal(alane)\nDiscalced(alane)\nUnmarred(dody)\nDyspneal(dody)\nAlgometric(dody)\nDiscalced(dody)\nHeatable(dody)\nUnmarred(kevina)\nDiscalced(kevina)\nParlous(kevina)\nParlous(alane) and Unmarred(alane) -> Algometric(alane)\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) -> Heatable(x))\nforall x (Discalced(x) and Heatable(x) -> Parlous(x))\n\nParlous(dody)\n\nDiscalced(dody) and Heatable(dody) and forall x (Discalced(x) and Heatable(x) -> Parlous(x)) -> therefore Parlous(dody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Joey is cattish. Joey is untrue. Joey is iodinating. Joey is tangible. Gennie is laciniate. Gennie is settled. Gennie is iodinating. Lauren is laciniate. Lauren is settled. Lauren is untrue. Lauren is iodinating. Lauren is tangible. Hersch is laciniate. Hersch is iodinating. Hersch is kaput. If Gennie is kaput and Gennie is laciniate then Gennie is untrue. All settled people are tangible. Quiet, tangible people are kaput. Lauren is not kaput.", "logic": "\nCattish(joey)\nUntrue(joey)\nIodinating(joey)\nTangible(joey)\nLaciniate(gennie)\nSettled(gennie)\nIodinating(gennie)\nLaciniate(lauren)\nSettled(lauren)\nUntrue(lauren)\nIodinating(lauren)\nTangible(lauren)\nLaciniate(hersch)\nIodinating(hersch)\nKaput(hersch)\nKaput(gennie) and Laciniate(gennie) -> Untrue(gennie)\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Tangible(x))\nforall x (Iodinating(x) and Tangible(x) -> Kaput(x))\n\nnot Kaput(lauren)\n\nIodinating(lauren) and Tangible(lauren) and forall x (Iodinating(x) and Tangible(x) -> Kaput(x)) -> therefore Kaput(lauren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Andonis is nestorian. Andonis is chipper. Andonis is grumous. Andonis is oblate. Delphina is unsanded. Delphina is illative. Delphina is grumous. Cristy is unsanded. Cristy is illative. Cristy is chipper. Cristy is grumous. Cristy is oblate. Tad is unsanded. Tad is grumous. Tad is ocher. If Delphina is ocher and Delphina is unsanded then Delphina is chipper. All illative people are oblate. Quiet, oblate people are ocher. Delphina is ocher.", "logic": "\nNestorian(andonis)\nChipper(andonis)\nGrumous(andonis)\nOblate(andonis)\nUnsanded(delphina)\nIllative(delphina)\nGrumous(delphina)\nUnsanded(cristy)\nIllative(cristy)\nChipper(cristy)\nGrumous(cristy)\nOblate(cristy)\nUnsanded(tad)\nGrumous(tad)\nOcher(tad)\nOcher(delphina) and Unsanded(delphina) -> Chipper(delphina)\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Oblate(x))\nforall x (Grumous(x) and Oblate(x) -> Ocher(x))\n\nOcher(delphina)\n\nIllative(delphina) and forall x (Illative(x) -> Oblate(x)) -> therefore Oblate(delphina) Grumous(delphina) and Oblate(delphina) and forall x (Grumous(x) and Oblate(x) -> Ocher(x)) -> therefore Ocher(delphina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Sherri is blocky. Sherri is ashy. Sherri is unnamed. Sherri is ventricose. Reeba is mono. Reeba is apodeictic. Reeba is unnamed. Tomasine is mono. Tomasine is apodeictic. Tomasine is ashy. Tomasine is unnamed. Tomasine is ventricose. Miriam is mono. Miriam is unnamed. Miriam is transient. If Reeba is transient and Reeba is mono then Reeba is ashy. All apodeictic people are ventricose. Quiet, ventricose people are transient. Reeba is not transient.", "logic": "\nBlocky(sherri)\nAshy(sherri)\nUnnamed(sherri)\nVentricose(sherri)\nMono(reeba)\nApodeictic(reeba)\nUnnamed(reeba)\nMono(tomasine)\nApodeictic(tomasine)\nAshy(tomasine)\nUnnamed(tomasine)\nVentricose(tomasine)\nMono(miriam)\nUnnamed(miriam)\nTransient(miriam)\nTransient(reeba) and Mono(reeba) -> Ashy(reeba)\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Ventricose(x))\nforall x (Unnamed(x) and Ventricose(x) -> Transient(x))\n\nnot Transient(reeba)\n\nApodeictic(reeba) and forall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Ventricose(x)) -> therefore Ventricose(reeba) Unnamed(reeba) and Ventricose(reeba) and forall x (Unnamed(x) and Ventricose(x) -> Transient(x)) -> therefore Transient(reeba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Harlan is owlish. Harlan is written. Harlan is terete. Harlan is unopposed. Lorry is untiring. Lorry is disturbed. Lorry is terete. Geoffrey is untiring. Geoffrey is disturbed. Geoffrey is written. Geoffrey is terete. Geoffrey is unopposed. Ardra is untiring. Ardra is terete. Ardra is inscribed. If Lorry is inscribed and Lorry is untiring then Lorry is written. All disturbed people are unopposed. Quiet, unopposed people are inscribed. Lorry is written.", "logic": "\nOwlish(harlan)\nWritten(harlan)\nTerete(harlan)\nUnopposed(harlan)\nUntiring(lorry)\nDisturbed(lorry)\nTerete(lorry)\nUntiring(geoffrey)\nDisturbed(geoffrey)\nWritten(geoffrey)\nTerete(geoffrey)\nUnopposed(geoffrey)\nUntiring(ardra)\nTerete(ardra)\nInscribed(ardra)\nInscribed(lorry) and Untiring(lorry) -> Written(lorry)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Unopposed(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) and Unopposed(x) -> Inscribed(x))\n\nWritten(lorry)\n\nDisturbed(lorry) and forall x (Disturbed(x) -> Unopposed(x)) -> therefore Unopposed(lorry) Terete(lorry) and Unopposed(lorry) and forall x (Terete(x) and Unopposed(x) -> Inscribed(x)) -> therefore Inscribed(lorry) Inscribed(lorry) and Untiring(lorry) and Inscribed(lorry) and Untiring(lorry) -> Written(lorry) -> therefore Written(lorry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Case is additive. Case is membered. Case is rutty. Case is delicate. Ossie is clawed. Ossie is pectoral. Ossie is rutty. Fayette is clawed. Fayette is pectoral. Fayette is membered. Fayette is rutty. Fayette is delicate. Raimund is clawed. Raimund is rutty. Raimund is assentient. If Ossie is assentient and Ossie is clawed then Ossie is membered. All pectoral people are delicate. Quiet, delicate people are assentient. Ossie is not membered.", "logic": "\nAdditive(case)\nMembered(case)\nRutty(case)\nDelicate(case)\nClawed(ossie)\nPectoral(ossie)\nRutty(ossie)\nClawed(fayette)\nPectoral(fayette)\nMembered(fayette)\nRutty(fayette)\nDelicate(fayette)\nClawed(raimund)\nRutty(raimund)\nAssentient(raimund)\nAssentient(ossie) and Clawed(ossie) -> Membered(ossie)\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Rutty(x) and Delicate(x) -> Assentient(x))\n\nnot Membered(ossie)\n\nPectoral(ossie) and forall x (Pectoral(x) -> Delicate(x)) -> therefore Delicate(ossie) Rutty(ossie) and Delicate(ossie) and forall x (Rutty(x) and Delicate(x) -> Assentient(x)) -> therefore Assentient(ossie) Assentient(ossie) and Clawed(ossie) and Assentient(ossie) and Clawed(ossie) -> Membered(ossie) -> therefore Membered(ossie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Gena is crapulent. Gena is sweetheart. Gena is unfunny. Gena is unifacial. Clarke is changed. Clarke is friendly. Clarke is unfunny. Levon is changed. Levon is friendly. Levon is sweetheart. Levon is unfunny. Levon is unifacial. Timmy is changed. Timmy is unfunny. Timmy is graceless. If Clarke is graceless and Clarke is changed then Clarke is sweetheart. All friendly people are unifacial. Quiet, unifacial people are graceless. Timmy is not unifacial.", "logic": "\nCrapulent(gena)\nSweetheart(gena)\nUnfunny(gena)\nUnifacial(gena)\nChanged(clarke)\nFriendly(clarke)\nUnfunny(clarke)\nChanged(levon)\nFriendly(levon)\nSweetheart(levon)\nUnfunny(levon)\nUnifacial(levon)\nChanged(timmy)\nUnfunny(timmy)\nGraceless(timmy)\nGraceless(clarke) and Changed(clarke) -> Sweetheart(clarke)\nforall x (Friendly(x) -> Unifacial(x))\nforall x (Unfunny(x) and Unifacial(x) -> Graceless(x))\n\nnot Unifacial(timmy)\n\nforall x (Friendly(x) -> Unifacial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Vinnie is simplex. Vinnie is affixial. Vinnie is supernal. Vinnie is antarctic. Nealson is zero. Nealson is federate. Nealson is supernal. Joye is zero. Joye is federate. Joye is affixial. Joye is supernal. Joye is antarctic. Elizabet is zero. Elizabet is supernal. Elizabet is elating. If Nealson is elating and Nealson is zero then Nealson is affixial. All federate people are antarctic. Quiet, antarctic people are elating. Vinnie is federate.", "logic": "\nSimplex(vinnie)\nAffixial(vinnie)\nSupernal(vinnie)\nAntarctic(vinnie)\nZero(nealson)\nFederate(nealson)\nSupernal(nealson)\nZero(joye)\nFederate(joye)\nAffixial(joye)\nSupernal(joye)\nAntarctic(joye)\nZero(elizabet)\nSupernal(elizabet)\nElating(elizabet)\nElating(nealson) and Zero(nealson) -> Affixial(nealson)\nforall x (Federate(x) -> Antarctic(x))\nforall x (Supernal(x) and Antarctic(x) -> Elating(x))\n\nFederate(vinnie)\n\nFederate(vinnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Elna is tiered. Elna is fringy. Elna is stony. Elna is elder. Blythe is ecumenical. Blythe is mouselike. Blythe is stony. Suzann is ecumenical. Suzann is mouselike. Suzann is fringy. Suzann is stony. Suzann is elder. Skylar is ecumenical. Skylar is stony. Skylar is ladened. If Blythe is ladened and Blythe is ecumenical then Blythe is fringy. All mouselike people are elder. Quiet, elder people are ladened. Blythe is not tiered.", "logic": "\nTiered(elna)\nFringy(elna)\nStony(elna)\nElder(elna)\nEcumenical(blythe)\nMouselike(blythe)\nStony(blythe)\nEcumenical(suzann)\nMouselike(suzann)\nFringy(suzann)\nStony(suzann)\nElder(suzann)\nEcumenical(skylar)\nStony(skylar)\nLadened(skylar)\nLadened(blythe) and Ecumenical(blythe) -> Fringy(blythe)\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Elder(x))\nforall x (Stony(x) and Elder(x) -> Ladened(x))\n\nnot Tiered(blythe)\n\nnot Tiered(blythe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Lizzy is useless. Lizzy is flexible. Lizzy is tomentous. Lizzy is berserk. Obadias is antenatal. Obadias is acapnial. Obadias is tomentous. Karolina is antenatal. Karolina is acapnial. Karolina is flexible. Karolina is tomentous. Karolina is berserk. Sebastian is antenatal. Sebastian is tomentous. Sebastian is frowzy. If Obadias is frowzy and Obadias is antenatal then Obadias is flexible. All acapnial people are berserk. Quiet, berserk people are frowzy. Sebastian is flexible.", "logic": "\nUseless(lizzy)\nFlexible(lizzy)\nTomentous(lizzy)\nBerserk(lizzy)\nAntenatal(obadias)\nAcapnial(obadias)\nTomentous(obadias)\nAntenatal(karolina)\nAcapnial(karolina)\nFlexible(karolina)\nTomentous(karolina)\nBerserk(karolina)\nAntenatal(sebastian)\nTomentous(sebastian)\nFrowzy(sebastian)\nFrowzy(obadias) and Antenatal(obadias) -> Flexible(obadias)\nforall x (Acapnial(x) -> Berserk(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) and Berserk(x) -> Frowzy(x))\n\nFlexible(sebastian)\n\nFlexible(sebastian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Elwina is glassed. Elwina is carpellary. Elwina is unbranched. Elwina is vicennial. Jef is dangerous. Jef is taloned. Jef is unbranched. Gerry is dangerous. Gerry is taloned. Gerry is carpellary. Gerry is unbranched. Gerry is vicennial. Patience is dangerous. Patience is unbranched. Patience is wrought. If Jef is wrought and Jef is dangerous then Jef is carpellary. All taloned people are vicennial. Quiet, vicennial people are wrought. Elwina is not dangerous.", "logic": "\nGlassed(elwina)\nCarpellary(elwina)\nUnbranched(elwina)\nVicennial(elwina)\nDangerous(jef)\nTaloned(jef)\nUnbranched(jef)\nDangerous(gerry)\nTaloned(gerry)\nCarpellary(gerry)\nUnbranched(gerry)\nVicennial(gerry)\nDangerous(patience)\nUnbranched(patience)\nWrought(patience)\nWrought(jef) and Dangerous(jef) -> Carpellary(jef)\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> Vicennial(x))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) and Vicennial(x) -> Wrought(x))\n\nnot Dangerous(elwina)\n\nnot Dangerous(elwina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Annemarie is artificial. Annemarie is homogenous. Annemarie is costal. Annemarie is telephonic. Gwenette is cosmic. Gwenette is developing. Gwenette is costal. Sibelle is cosmic. Sibelle is developing. Sibelle is homogenous. Sibelle is costal. Sibelle is telephonic. Lanna is cosmic. Lanna is costal. Lanna is follicular. If Gwenette is follicular and Gwenette is cosmic then Gwenette is homogenous. All developing people are telephonic. Quiet, telephonic people are follicular. Sibelle is artificial.", "logic": "\nArtificial(annemarie)\nHomogenous(annemarie)\nCostal(annemarie)\nTelephonic(annemarie)\nCosmic(gwenette)\nDeveloping(gwenette)\nCostal(gwenette)\nCosmic(sibelle)\nDeveloping(sibelle)\nHomogenous(sibelle)\nCostal(sibelle)\nTelephonic(sibelle)\nCosmic(lanna)\nCostal(lanna)\nFollicular(lanna)\nFollicular(gwenette) and Cosmic(gwenette) -> Homogenous(gwenette)\nforall x (Developing(x) -> Telephonic(x))\nforall x (Costal(x) and Telephonic(x) -> Follicular(x))\n\nArtificial(sibelle)\n\nArtificial(sibelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Francois is daily. Francois is cercarial. Francois is adsorbate. Francois is grilled. Pris is holey. Pris is squamulose. Pris is adsorbate. Rhetta is holey. Rhetta is squamulose. Rhetta is cercarial. Rhetta is adsorbate. Rhetta is grilled. Theo is holey. Theo is adsorbate. Theo is vagile. If Pris is vagile and Pris is holey then Pris is cercarial. All squamulose people are grilled. Quiet, grilled people are vagile. Theo is not daily.", "logic": "\nDaily(francois)\nCercarial(francois)\nAdsorbate(francois)\nGrilled(francois)\nHoley(pris)\nSquamulose(pris)\nAdsorbate(pris)\nHoley(rhetta)\nSquamulose(rhetta)\nCercarial(rhetta)\nAdsorbate(rhetta)\nGrilled(rhetta)\nHoley(theo)\nAdsorbate(theo)\nVagile(theo)\nVagile(pris) and Holey(pris) -> Cercarial(pris)\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Adsorbate(x) and Grilled(x) -> Vagile(x))\n\nnot Daily(theo)\n\nnot Daily(theo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Manish is colorectal. Manish is callous. Manish is eared. Manish is offstage. Gabrielle is dual. Gabrielle is bridal. Gabrielle is eared. Liliane is dual. Liliane is bridal. Liliane is callous. Liliane is eared. Liliane is offstage. Dasi is dual. Dasi is eared. Dasi is cumbrous. If Gabrielle is cumbrous and Gabrielle is dual then Gabrielle is callous. All bridal people are offstage. Quiet, offstage people are cumbrous. Dasi is bridal.", "logic": "\nColorectal(manish)\nCallous(manish)\nEared(manish)\nOffstage(manish)\nDual(gabrielle)\nBridal(gabrielle)\nEared(gabrielle)\nDual(liliane)\nBridal(liliane)\nCallous(liliane)\nEared(liliane)\nOffstage(liliane)\nDual(dasi)\nEared(dasi)\nCumbrous(dasi)\nCumbrous(gabrielle) and Dual(gabrielle) -> Callous(gabrielle)\nforall x (Bridal(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Eared(x) and Offstage(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\n\nBridal(dasi)\n\nBridal(dasi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "The quintana bromate the ferinand. The ferinand does not eat the willie. The ferinand reminisce the amber. The ferinand is promissory. The ferinand is viewless. The ferinand is bladed. The ferinand bromate the quintana. The ferinand does not like the willie. The ferinand dropforge the willie. The ferinand dropforge the amber. The willie dropforge the ferinand. The amber is viewless. The amber is not senior. The amber bromate the willie. The amber dropforge the quintana. The amber dropforge the ferinand. If the quintana bromate the ferinand and the quintana does not eat the amber then the quintana bromate the willie. If something bromate the ferinand and it dropforge the ferinand then it is promissory. If something is promissory then it is viewless. If the ferinand dropforge the amber and the ferinand does not like the willie then the amber reminisce the ferinand. If something is senior and it does not visit the willie then it dropforge the ferinand. If something bromate the ferinand and the ferinand bromate the quintana then the ferinand does not eat the willie. If something dropforge the amber and the amber does not visit the quintana then the amber is viewless. If something dropforge the willie and it dropforge the amber then the willie bromate the ferinand. The amber dropforge the ferinand.", "logic": "\nBromate(quintana, ferinand)\nnot Reminisce(ferinand, willie)\nReminisce(ferinand, amber)\nPromissory(ferinand)\nViewless(ferinand)\nBladed(ferinand)\nBromate(ferinand, quintana)\nnot Bromate(ferinand, willie)\nDropforge(ferinand, willie)\nDropforge(ferinand, amber)\nDropforge(willie, ferinand)\nViewless(amber)\nnot Senior(amber)\nBromate(amber, willie)\nDropforge(amber, quintana)\nDropforge(amber, ferinand)\nBromate(quintana, ferinand) and not Reminisce(quintana, amber) -> Bromate(quintana, willie)\nforall x (Bromate(x, ferinand) and Dropforge(x, ferinand) -> Promissory(x))\nforall x (Promissory(x) -> Viewless(x))\nDropforge(ferinand, amber) and not Bromate(ferinand, willie) -> Reminisce(amber, ferinand)\nforall x (Senior(x) and not Dropforge(x, willie) -> Dropforge(x, ferinand))\nforall x (Bromate(x, ferinand) and Bromate(ferinand, quintana) -> not Reminisce(ferinand, willie))\nforall x (Dropforge(x, amber) and not Dropforge(amber, quintana) -> Viewless(amber))\nforall x (Dropforge(x, willie) and Dropforge(x, amber) -> Bromate(willie, ferinand))\n\nDropforge(amber, ferinand)\n\ntherefore Dropforge(amber, ferinand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The cayla disinvest the lana. The lana does not eat the michaela. The lana gaze the clinten. The lana is undefended. The lana is unabashed. The lana is adjusted. The lana disinvest the cayla. The lana does not like the michaela. The lana cinematise the michaela. The lana cinematise the clinten. The michaela cinematise the lana. The clinten is unabashed. The clinten is not flimsy. The clinten disinvest the michaela. The clinten cinematise the cayla. The clinten cinematise the lana. If the cayla disinvest the lana and the cayla does not eat the clinten then the cayla disinvest the michaela. If something disinvest the lana and it cinematise the lana then it is undefended. If something is undefended then it is unabashed. If the lana cinematise the clinten and the lana does not like the michaela then the clinten gaze the lana. If something is flimsy and it does not visit the michaela then it cinematise the lana. If something disinvest the lana and the lana disinvest the cayla then the lana does not eat the michaela. If something cinematise the clinten and the clinten does not visit the cayla then the clinten is unabashed. If something cinematise the michaela and it cinematise the clinten then the michaela disinvest the lana. The clinten does not visit the lana.", "logic": "\nDisinvest(cayla, lana)\nnot Gaze(lana, michaela)\nGaze(lana, clinten)\nUndefended(lana)\nUnabashed(lana)\nAdjusted(lana)\nDisinvest(lana, cayla)\nnot Disinvest(lana, michaela)\nCinematise(lana, michaela)\nCinematise(lana, clinten)\nCinematise(michaela, lana)\nUnabashed(clinten)\nnot Flimsy(clinten)\nDisinvest(clinten, michaela)\nCinematise(clinten, cayla)\nCinematise(clinten, lana)\nDisinvest(cayla, lana) and not Gaze(cayla, clinten) -> Disinvest(cayla, michaela)\nforall x (Disinvest(x, lana) and Cinematise(x, lana) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) -> Unabashed(x))\nCinematise(lana, clinten) and not Disinvest(lana, michaela) -> Gaze(clinten, lana)\nforall x (Flimsy(x) and not Cinematise(x, michaela) -> Cinematise(x, lana))\nforall x (Disinvest(x, lana) and Disinvest(lana, cayla) -> not Gaze(lana, michaela))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, clinten) and not Cinematise(clinten, cayla) -> Unabashed(clinten))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, michaela) and Cinematise(x, clinten) -> Disinvest(michaela, lana))\n\nnot Cinematise(clinten, lana)\n\ntherefore Cinematise(clinten, lana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The paule previse the hyacintha. The hyacintha does not eat the blithe. The hyacintha void the kari. The hyacintha is veiled. The hyacintha is chargeable. The hyacintha is straight. The hyacintha previse the paule. The hyacintha does not like the blithe. The hyacintha keratinize the blithe. The hyacintha keratinize the kari. The blithe keratinize the hyacintha. The kari is chargeable. The kari is not neuralgic. The kari previse the blithe. The kari keratinize the paule. The kari keratinize the hyacintha. If the paule previse the hyacintha and the paule does not eat the kari then the paule previse the blithe. If something previse the hyacintha and it keratinize the hyacintha then it is veiled. If something is veiled then it is chargeable. If the hyacintha keratinize the kari and the hyacintha does not like the blithe then the kari void the hyacintha. If something is neuralgic and it does not visit the blithe then it keratinize the hyacintha. If something previse the hyacintha and the hyacintha previse the paule then the hyacintha does not eat the blithe. If something keratinize the kari and the kari does not visit the paule then the kari is chargeable. If something keratinize the blithe and it keratinize the kari then the blithe previse the hyacintha. The kari void the hyacintha.", "logic": "\nPrevise(paule, hyacintha)\nnot Void(hyacintha, blithe)\nVoid(hyacintha, kari)\nVeiled(hyacintha)\nChargeable(hyacintha)\nStraight(hyacintha)\nPrevise(hyacintha, paule)\nnot Previse(hyacintha, blithe)\nKeratinize(hyacintha, blithe)\nKeratinize(hyacintha, kari)\nKeratinize(blithe, hyacintha)\nChargeable(kari)\nnot Neuralgic(kari)\nPrevise(kari, blithe)\nKeratinize(kari, paule)\nKeratinize(kari, hyacintha)\nPrevise(paule, hyacintha) and not Void(paule, kari) -> Previse(paule, blithe)\nforall x (Previse(x, hyacintha) and Keratinize(x, hyacintha) -> Veiled(x))\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nKeratinize(hyacintha, kari) and not Previse(hyacintha, blithe) -> Void(kari, hyacintha)\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) and not Keratinize(x, blithe) -> Keratinize(x, hyacintha))\nforall x (Previse(x, hyacintha) and Previse(hyacintha, paule) -> not Void(hyacintha, blithe))\nforall x (Keratinize(x, kari) and not Keratinize(kari, paule) -> Chargeable(kari))\nforall x (Keratinize(x, blithe) and Keratinize(x, kari) -> Previse(blithe, hyacintha))\n\nVoid(kari, hyacintha)\n\nKeratinize(hyacintha, kari) and not Previse(hyacintha, blithe) and Keratinize(hyacintha, kari) and not Previse(hyacintha, blithe) -> Void(kari, hyacintha) -> therefore Void(kari, hyacintha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The jania explain the esme. The esme does not eat the salli. The esme foist the maude. The esme is free. The esme is psychotic. The esme is meritable. The esme explain the jania. The esme does not like the salli. The esme funk the salli. The esme funk the maude. The salli funk the esme. The maude is psychotic. The maude is not chambered. The maude explain the salli. The maude funk the jania. The maude funk the esme. If the jania explain the esme and the jania does not eat the maude then the jania explain the salli. If something explain the esme and it funk the esme then it is free. If something is free then it is psychotic. If the esme funk the maude and the esme does not like the salli then the maude foist the esme. If something is chambered and it does not visit the salli then it funk the esme. If something explain the esme and the esme explain the jania then the esme does not eat the salli. If something funk the maude and the maude does not visit the jania then the maude is psychotic. If something funk the salli and it funk the maude then the salli explain the esme. The salli does not like the esme.", "logic": "\nExplain(jania, esme)\nnot Foist(esme, salli)\nFoist(esme, maude)\nFree(esme)\nPsychotic(esme)\nMeritable(esme)\nExplain(esme, jania)\nnot Explain(esme, salli)\nFunk(esme, salli)\nFunk(esme, maude)\nFunk(salli, esme)\nPsychotic(maude)\nnot Chambered(maude)\nExplain(maude, salli)\nFunk(maude, jania)\nFunk(maude, esme)\nExplain(jania, esme) and not Foist(jania, maude) -> Explain(jania, salli)\nforall x (Explain(x, esme) and Funk(x, esme) -> Free(x))\nforall x (Free(x) -> Psychotic(x))\nFunk(esme, maude) and not Explain(esme, salli) -> Foist(maude, esme)\nforall x (Chambered(x) and not Funk(x, salli) -> Funk(x, esme))\nforall x (Explain(x, esme) and Explain(esme, jania) -> not Foist(esme, salli))\nforall x (Funk(x, maude) and not Funk(maude, jania) -> Psychotic(maude))\nforall x (Funk(x, salli) and Funk(x, maude) -> Explain(salli, esme))\n\nnot Explain(salli, esme)\n\nFunk(esme, salli) and Funk(esme, maude) and forall x (Funk(x, salli) and Funk(x, maude) -> Explain(salli, esme)) -> therefore Explain(salli, esme)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The arlen suspend the gratia. The gratia does not eat the hamlet. The gratia exsert the bianca. The gratia is betrothed. The gratia is macho. The gratia is springless. The gratia suspend the arlen. The gratia does not like the hamlet. The gratia heist the hamlet. The gratia heist the bianca. The hamlet heist the gratia. The bianca is macho. The bianca is not anadromous. The bianca suspend the hamlet. The bianca heist the arlen. The bianca heist the gratia. If the arlen suspend the gratia and the arlen does not eat the bianca then the arlen suspend the hamlet. If something suspend the gratia and it heist the gratia then it is betrothed. If something is betrothed then it is macho. If the gratia heist the bianca and the gratia does not like the hamlet then the bianca exsert the gratia. If something is anadromous and it does not visit the hamlet then it heist the gratia. If something suspend the gratia and the gratia suspend the arlen then the gratia does not eat the hamlet. If something heist the bianca and the bianca does not visit the arlen then the bianca is macho. If something heist the hamlet and it heist the bianca then the hamlet suspend the gratia. The hamlet is betrothed.", "logic": "\nSuspend(arlen, gratia)\nnot Exsert(gratia, hamlet)\nExsert(gratia, bianca)\nBetrothed(gratia)\nMacho(gratia)\nSpringless(gratia)\nSuspend(gratia, arlen)\nnot Suspend(gratia, hamlet)\nHeist(gratia, hamlet)\nHeist(gratia, bianca)\nHeist(hamlet, gratia)\nMacho(bianca)\nnot Anadromous(bianca)\nSuspend(bianca, hamlet)\nHeist(bianca, arlen)\nHeist(bianca, gratia)\nSuspend(arlen, gratia) and not Exsert(arlen, bianca) -> Suspend(arlen, hamlet)\nforall x (Suspend(x, gratia) and Heist(x, gratia) -> Betrothed(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Macho(x))\nHeist(gratia, bianca) and not Suspend(gratia, hamlet) -> Exsert(bianca, gratia)\nforall x (Anadromous(x) and not Heist(x, hamlet) -> Heist(x, gratia))\nforall x (Suspend(x, gratia) and Suspend(gratia, arlen) -> not Exsert(gratia, hamlet))\nforall x (Heist(x, bianca) and not Heist(bianca, arlen) -> Macho(bianca))\nforall x (Heist(x, hamlet) and Heist(x, bianca) -> Suspend(hamlet, gratia))\n\nBetrothed(hamlet)\n\nHeist(gratia, hamlet) and Heist(gratia, bianca) and forall x (Heist(x, hamlet) and Heist(x, bianca) -> Suspend(hamlet, gratia)) -> therefore Suspend(hamlet, gratia) Suspend(hamlet, gratia) and Heist(hamlet, gratia) and forall x (Suspend(x, gratia) and Heist(x, gratia) -> Betrothed(x)) -> therefore Betrothed(hamlet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The melinda educe the fallon. The fallon does not eat the idelle. The fallon lollop the hyacinthe. The fallon is sporting. The fallon is rapacious. The fallon is epenthetic. The fallon educe the melinda. The fallon does not like the idelle. The fallon sway the idelle. The fallon sway the hyacinthe. The idelle sway the fallon. The hyacinthe is rapacious. The hyacinthe is not rubicund. The hyacinthe educe the idelle. The hyacinthe sway the melinda. The hyacinthe sway the fallon. If the melinda educe the fallon and the melinda does not eat the hyacinthe then the melinda educe the idelle. If something educe the fallon and it sway the fallon then it is sporting. If something is sporting then it is rapacious. If the fallon sway the hyacinthe and the fallon does not like the idelle then the hyacinthe lollop the fallon. If something is rubicund and it does not visit the idelle then it sway the fallon. If something educe the fallon and the fallon educe the melinda then the fallon does not eat the idelle. If something sway the hyacinthe and the hyacinthe does not visit the melinda then the hyacinthe is rapacious. If something sway the idelle and it sway the hyacinthe then the idelle educe the fallon. The idelle is not sporting.", "logic": "\nEduce(melinda, fallon)\nnot Lollop(fallon, idelle)\nLollop(fallon, hyacinthe)\nSporting(fallon)\nRapacious(fallon)\nEpenthetic(fallon)\nEduce(fallon, melinda)\nnot Educe(fallon, idelle)\nSway(fallon, idelle)\nSway(fallon, hyacinthe)\nSway(idelle, fallon)\nRapacious(hyacinthe)\nnot Rubicund(hyacinthe)\nEduce(hyacinthe, idelle)\nSway(hyacinthe, melinda)\nSway(hyacinthe, fallon)\nEduce(melinda, fallon) and not Lollop(melinda, hyacinthe) -> Educe(melinda, idelle)\nforall x (Educe(x, fallon) and Sway(x, fallon) -> Sporting(x))\nforall x (Sporting(x) -> Rapacious(x))\nSway(fallon, hyacinthe) and not Educe(fallon, idelle) -> Lollop(hyacinthe, fallon)\nforall x (Rubicund(x) and not Sway(x, idelle) -> Sway(x, fallon))\nforall x (Educe(x, fallon) and Educe(fallon, melinda) -> not Lollop(fallon, idelle))\nforall x (Sway(x, hyacinthe) and not Sway(hyacinthe, melinda) -> Rapacious(hyacinthe))\nforall x (Sway(x, idelle) and Sway(x, hyacinthe) -> Educe(idelle, fallon))\n\nnot Sporting(idelle)\n\nSway(fallon, idelle) and Sway(fallon, hyacinthe) and forall x (Sway(x, idelle) and Sway(x, hyacinthe) -> Educe(idelle, fallon)) -> therefore Educe(idelle, fallon) Educe(idelle, fallon) and Sway(idelle, fallon) and forall x (Educe(x, fallon) and Sway(x, fallon) -> Sporting(x)) -> therefore Sporting(idelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The gertrud revivify the witty. The witty does not eat the johnathon. The witty measure the mindy. The witty is awestruck. The witty is bracteate. The witty is chartered. The witty revivify the gertrud. The witty does not like the johnathon. The witty till the johnathon. The witty till the mindy. The johnathon till the witty. The mindy is bracteate. The mindy is not stomachal. The mindy revivify the johnathon. The mindy till the gertrud. The mindy till the witty. If the gertrud revivify the witty and the gertrud does not eat the mindy then the gertrud revivify the johnathon. If something revivify the witty and it till the witty then it is awestruck. If something is awestruck then it is bracteate. If the witty till the mindy and the witty does not like the johnathon then the mindy measure the witty. If something is stomachal and it does not visit the johnathon then it till the witty. If something revivify the witty and the witty revivify the gertrud then the witty does not eat the johnathon. If something till the mindy and the mindy does not visit the gertrud then the mindy is bracteate. If something till the johnathon and it till the mindy then the johnathon revivify the witty. The johnathon is bracteate.", "logic": "\nRevivify(gertrud, witty)\nnot Measure(witty, johnathon)\nMeasure(witty, mindy)\nAwestruck(witty)\nBracteate(witty)\nChartered(witty)\nRevivify(witty, gertrud)\nnot Revivify(witty, johnathon)\nTill(witty, johnathon)\nTill(witty, mindy)\nTill(johnathon, witty)\nBracteate(mindy)\nnot Stomachal(mindy)\nRevivify(mindy, johnathon)\nTill(mindy, gertrud)\nTill(mindy, witty)\nRevivify(gertrud, witty) and not Measure(gertrud, mindy) -> Revivify(gertrud, johnathon)\nforall x (Revivify(x, witty) and Till(x, witty) -> Awestruck(x))\nforall x (Awestruck(x) -> Bracteate(x))\nTill(witty, mindy) and not Revivify(witty, johnathon) -> Measure(mindy, witty)\nforall x (Stomachal(x) and not Till(x, johnathon) -> Till(x, witty))\nforall x (Revivify(x, witty) and Revivify(witty, gertrud) -> not Measure(witty, johnathon))\nforall x (Till(x, mindy) and not Till(mindy, gertrud) -> Bracteate(mindy))\nforall x (Till(x, johnathon) and Till(x, mindy) -> Revivify(johnathon, witty))\n\nBracteate(johnathon)\n\nTill(witty, johnathon) and Till(witty, mindy) and forall x (Till(x, johnathon) and Till(x, mindy) -> Revivify(johnathon, witty)) -> therefore Revivify(johnathon, witty) Revivify(johnathon, witty) and Till(johnathon, witty) and forall x (Revivify(x, witty) and Till(x, witty) -> Awestruck(x)) -> therefore Awestruck(johnathon) Awestruck(johnathon) and forall x (Awestruck(x) -> Bracteate(x)) -> therefore Bracteate(johnathon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The gillie agnize the annette. The annette does not eat the thedrick. The annette glut the ernaline. The annette is allergic. The annette is automatic. The annette is bass. The annette agnize the gillie. The annette does not like the thedrick. The annette whisker the thedrick. The annette whisker the ernaline. The thedrick whisker the annette. The ernaline is automatic. The ernaline is not deadpan. The ernaline agnize the thedrick. The ernaline whisker the gillie. The ernaline whisker the annette. If the gillie agnize the annette and the gillie does not eat the ernaline then the gillie agnize the thedrick. If something agnize the annette and it whisker the annette then it is allergic. If something is allergic then it is automatic. If the annette whisker the ernaline and the annette does not like the thedrick then the ernaline glut the annette. If something is deadpan and it does not visit the thedrick then it whisker the annette. If something agnize the annette and the annette agnize the gillie then the annette does not eat the thedrick. If something whisker the ernaline and the ernaline does not visit the gillie then the ernaline is automatic. If something whisker the thedrick and it whisker the ernaline then the thedrick agnize the annette. The thedrick is not automatic.", "logic": "\nAgnize(gillie, annette)\nnot Glut(annette, thedrick)\nGlut(annette, ernaline)\nAllergic(annette)\nAutomatic(annette)\nBass(annette)\nAgnize(annette, gillie)\nnot Agnize(annette, thedrick)\nWhisker(annette, thedrick)\nWhisker(annette, ernaline)\nWhisker(thedrick, annette)\nAutomatic(ernaline)\nnot Deadpan(ernaline)\nAgnize(ernaline, thedrick)\nWhisker(ernaline, gillie)\nWhisker(ernaline, annette)\nAgnize(gillie, annette) and not Glut(gillie, ernaline) -> Agnize(gillie, thedrick)\nforall x (Agnize(x, annette) and Whisker(x, annette) -> Allergic(x))\nforall x (Allergic(x) -> Automatic(x))\nWhisker(annette, ernaline) and not Agnize(annette, thedrick) -> Glut(ernaline, annette)\nforall x (Deadpan(x) and not Whisker(x, thedrick) -> Whisker(x, annette))\nforall x (Agnize(x, annette) and Agnize(annette, gillie) -> not Glut(annette, thedrick))\nforall x (Whisker(x, ernaline) and not Whisker(ernaline, gillie) -> Automatic(ernaline))\nforall x (Whisker(x, thedrick) and Whisker(x, ernaline) -> Agnize(thedrick, annette))\n\nnot Automatic(thedrick)\n\nWhisker(annette, thedrick) and Whisker(annette, ernaline) and forall x (Whisker(x, thedrick) and Whisker(x, ernaline) -> Agnize(thedrick, annette)) -> therefore Agnize(thedrick, annette) Agnize(thedrick, annette) and Whisker(thedrick, annette) and forall x (Agnize(x, annette) and Whisker(x, annette) -> Allergic(x)) -> therefore Allergic(thedrick) Allergic(thedrick) and forall x (Allergic(x) -> Automatic(x)) -> therefore Automatic(thedrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The goldy skimcoat the odella. The odella does not eat the art. The odella wrinkle the mabel. The odella is lienal. The odella is disabling. The odella is virtuoso. The odella skimcoat the goldy. The odella does not like the art. The odella fagot the art. The odella fagot the mabel. The art fagot the odella. The mabel is disabling. The mabel is not verdant. The mabel skimcoat the art. The mabel fagot the goldy. The mabel fagot the odella. If the goldy skimcoat the odella and the goldy does not eat the mabel then the goldy skimcoat the art. If something skimcoat the odella and it fagot the odella then it is lienal. If something is lienal then it is disabling. If the odella fagot the mabel and the odella does not like the art then the mabel wrinkle the odella. If something is verdant and it does not visit the art then it fagot the odella. If something skimcoat the odella and the odella skimcoat the goldy then the odella does not eat the art. If something fagot the mabel and the mabel does not visit the goldy then the mabel is disabling. If something fagot the art and it fagot the mabel then the art skimcoat the odella. The goldy is not disabling.", "logic": "\nSkimcoat(goldy, odella)\nnot Wrinkle(odella, art)\nWrinkle(odella, mabel)\nLienal(odella)\nDisabling(odella)\nVirtuoso(odella)\nSkimcoat(odella, goldy)\nnot Skimcoat(odella, art)\nFagot(odella, art)\nFagot(odella, mabel)\nFagot(art, odella)\nDisabling(mabel)\nnot Verdant(mabel)\nSkimcoat(mabel, art)\nFagot(mabel, goldy)\nFagot(mabel, odella)\nSkimcoat(goldy, odella) and not Wrinkle(goldy, mabel) -> Skimcoat(goldy, art)\nforall x (Skimcoat(x, odella) and Fagot(x, odella) -> Lienal(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> Disabling(x))\nFagot(odella, mabel) and not Skimcoat(odella, art) -> Wrinkle(mabel, odella)\nforall x (Verdant(x) and not Fagot(x, art) -> Fagot(x, odella))\nforall x (Skimcoat(x, odella) and Skimcoat(odella, goldy) -> not Wrinkle(odella, art))\nforall x (Fagot(x, mabel) and not Fagot(mabel, goldy) -> Disabling(mabel))\nforall x (Fagot(x, art) and Fagot(x, mabel) -> Skimcoat(art, odella))\n\nnot Disabling(goldy)\n\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> Disabling(x)) <- forall x (Skimcoat(x, odella) and Fagot(x, odella) -> Lienal(x)) <- forall x (Verdant(x) and not Fagot(x, art) -> Fagot(x, odella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The breena digitalise the ellsworth. The ellsworth does not eat the beret. The ellsworth froth the len. The ellsworth is crippling. The ellsworth is feminine. The ellsworth is metastatic. The ellsworth digitalise the breena. The ellsworth does not like the beret. The ellsworth molder the beret. The ellsworth molder the len. The beret molder the ellsworth. The len is feminine. The len is not protracted. The len digitalise the beret. The len molder the breena. The len molder the ellsworth. If the breena digitalise the ellsworth and the breena does not eat the len then the breena digitalise the beret. If something digitalise the ellsworth and it molder the ellsworth then it is crippling. If something is crippling then it is feminine. If the ellsworth molder the len and the ellsworth does not like the beret then the len froth the ellsworth. If something is protracted and it does not visit the beret then it molder the ellsworth. If something digitalise the ellsworth and the ellsworth digitalise the breena then the ellsworth does not eat the beret. If something molder the len and the len does not visit the breena then the len is feminine. If something molder the beret and it molder the len then the beret digitalise the ellsworth. The breena molder the ellsworth.", "logic": "\nDigitalise(breena, ellsworth)\nnot Froth(ellsworth, beret)\nFroth(ellsworth, len)\nCrippling(ellsworth)\nFeminine(ellsworth)\nMetastatic(ellsworth)\nDigitalise(ellsworth, breena)\nnot Digitalise(ellsworth, beret)\nMolder(ellsworth, beret)\nMolder(ellsworth, len)\nMolder(beret, ellsworth)\nFeminine(len)\nnot Protracted(len)\nDigitalise(len, beret)\nMolder(len, breena)\nMolder(len, ellsworth)\nDigitalise(breena, ellsworth) and not Froth(breena, len) -> Digitalise(breena, beret)\nforall x (Digitalise(x, ellsworth) and Molder(x, ellsworth) -> Crippling(x))\nforall x (Crippling(x) -> Feminine(x))\nMolder(ellsworth, len) and not Digitalise(ellsworth, beret) -> Froth(len, ellsworth)\nforall x (Protracted(x) and not Molder(x, beret) -> Molder(x, ellsworth))\nforall x (Digitalise(x, ellsworth) and Digitalise(ellsworth, breena) -> not Froth(ellsworth, beret))\nforall x (Molder(x, len) and not Molder(len, breena) -> Feminine(len))\nforall x (Molder(x, beret) and Molder(x, len) -> Digitalise(beret, ellsworth))\n\nMolder(breena, ellsworth)\n\nforall x (Protracted(x) and not Molder(x, beret) -> Molder(x, ellsworth)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The kynthia trouble the eugene. The eugene does not eat the tessie. The eugene slue the velvet. The eugene is convincing. The eugene is washy. The eugene is motive. The eugene trouble the kynthia. The eugene does not like the tessie. The eugene victimise the tessie. The eugene victimise the velvet. The tessie victimise the eugene. The velvet is washy. The velvet is not porcine. The velvet trouble the tessie. The velvet victimise the kynthia. The velvet victimise the eugene. If the kynthia trouble the eugene and the kynthia does not eat the velvet then the kynthia trouble the tessie. If something trouble the eugene and it victimise the eugene then it is convincing. If something is convincing then it is washy. If the eugene victimise the velvet and the eugene does not like the tessie then the velvet slue the eugene. If something is porcine and it does not visit the tessie then it victimise the eugene. If something trouble the eugene and the eugene trouble the kynthia then the eugene does not eat the tessie. If something victimise the velvet and the velvet does not visit the kynthia then the velvet is washy. If something victimise the tessie and it victimise the velvet then the tessie trouble the eugene. The kynthia does not like the tessie.", "logic": "\nTrouble(kynthia, eugene)\nnot Slue(eugene, tessie)\nSlue(eugene, velvet)\nConvincing(eugene)\nWashy(eugene)\nMotive(eugene)\nTrouble(eugene, kynthia)\nnot Trouble(eugene, tessie)\nVictimise(eugene, tessie)\nVictimise(eugene, velvet)\nVictimise(tessie, eugene)\nWashy(velvet)\nnot Porcine(velvet)\nTrouble(velvet, tessie)\nVictimise(velvet, kynthia)\nVictimise(velvet, eugene)\nTrouble(kynthia, eugene) and not Slue(kynthia, velvet) -> Trouble(kynthia, tessie)\nforall x (Trouble(x, eugene) and Victimise(x, eugene) -> Convincing(x))\nforall x (Convincing(x) -> Washy(x))\nVictimise(eugene, velvet) and not Trouble(eugene, tessie) -> Slue(velvet, eugene)\nforall x (Porcine(x) and not Victimise(x, tessie) -> Victimise(x, eugene))\nforall x (Trouble(x, eugene) and Trouble(eugene, kynthia) -> not Slue(eugene, tessie))\nforall x (Victimise(x, velvet) and not Victimise(velvet, kynthia) -> Washy(velvet))\nforall x (Victimise(x, tessie) and Victimise(x, velvet) -> Trouble(tessie, eugene))\n\nnot Trouble(kynthia, tessie)\n\nTrouble(kynthia, eugene) and not Slue(kynthia, velvet) -> Trouble(kynthia, tessie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The kimberley butter the rakel. The rakel does not eat the wakefield. The rakel crepe the lois. The rakel is vulpine. The rakel is deflective. The rakel is unbeatable. The rakel butter the kimberley. The rakel does not like the wakefield. The rakel rumble the wakefield. The rakel rumble the lois. The wakefield rumble the rakel. The lois is deflective. The lois is not pathetic. The lois butter the wakefield. The lois rumble the kimberley. The lois rumble the rakel. If the kimberley butter the rakel and the kimberley does not eat the lois then the kimberley butter the wakefield. If something butter the rakel and it rumble the rakel then it is vulpine. If something is vulpine then it is deflective. If the rakel rumble the lois and the rakel does not like the wakefield then the lois crepe the rakel. If something is pathetic and it does not visit the wakefield then it rumble the rakel. If something butter the rakel and the rakel butter the kimberley then the rakel does not eat the wakefield. If something rumble the lois and the lois does not visit the kimberley then the lois is deflective. If something rumble the wakefield and it rumble the lois then the wakefield butter the rakel. The lois is vulpine.", "logic": "\nButter(kimberley, rakel)\nnot Crepe(rakel, wakefield)\nCrepe(rakel, lois)\nVulpine(rakel)\nDeflective(rakel)\nUnbeatable(rakel)\nButter(rakel, kimberley)\nnot Butter(rakel, wakefield)\nRumble(rakel, wakefield)\nRumble(rakel, lois)\nRumble(wakefield, rakel)\nDeflective(lois)\nnot Pathetic(lois)\nButter(lois, wakefield)\nRumble(lois, kimberley)\nRumble(lois, rakel)\nButter(kimberley, rakel) and not Crepe(kimberley, lois) -> Butter(kimberley, wakefield)\nforall x (Butter(x, rakel) and Rumble(x, rakel) -> Vulpine(x))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) -> Deflective(x))\nRumble(rakel, lois) and not Butter(rakel, wakefield) -> Crepe(lois, rakel)\nforall x (Pathetic(x) and not Rumble(x, wakefield) -> Rumble(x, rakel))\nforall x (Butter(x, rakel) and Butter(rakel, kimberley) -> not Crepe(rakel, wakefield))\nforall x (Rumble(x, lois) and not Rumble(lois, kimberley) -> Deflective(lois))\nforall x (Rumble(x, wakefield) and Rumble(x, lois) -> Butter(wakefield, rakel))\n\nVulpine(lois)\n\nforall x (Butter(x, rakel) and Rumble(x, rakel) -> Vulpine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The leah carol the loreen. The loreen does not eat the issie. The loreen tense the madison. The loreen is sepaloid. The loreen is unbelted. The loreen is dustlike. The loreen carol the leah. The loreen does not like the issie. The loreen yawl the issie. The loreen yawl the madison. The issie yawl the loreen. The madison is unbelted. The madison is not trojan. The madison carol the issie. The madison yawl the leah. The madison yawl the loreen. If the leah carol the loreen and the leah does not eat the madison then the leah carol the issie. If something carol the loreen and it yawl the loreen then it is sepaloid. If something is sepaloid then it is unbelted. If the loreen yawl the madison and the loreen does not like the issie then the madison tense the loreen. If something is trojan and it does not visit the issie then it yawl the loreen. If something carol the loreen and the loreen carol the leah then the loreen does not eat the issie. If something yawl the madison and the madison does not visit the leah then the madison is unbelted. If something yawl the issie and it yawl the madison then the issie carol the loreen. The loreen does not eat the leah.", "logic": "\nCarol(leah, loreen)\nnot Tense(loreen, issie)\nTense(loreen, madison)\nSepaloid(loreen)\nUnbelted(loreen)\nDustlike(loreen)\nCarol(loreen, leah)\nnot Carol(loreen, issie)\nYawl(loreen, issie)\nYawl(loreen, madison)\nYawl(issie, loreen)\nUnbelted(madison)\nnot Trojan(madison)\nCarol(madison, issie)\nYawl(madison, leah)\nYawl(madison, loreen)\nCarol(leah, loreen) and not Tense(leah, madison) -> Carol(leah, issie)\nforall x (Carol(x, loreen) and Yawl(x, loreen) -> Sepaloid(x))\nforall x (Sepaloid(x) -> Unbelted(x))\nYawl(loreen, madison) and not Carol(loreen, issie) -> Tense(madison, loreen)\nforall x (Trojan(x) and not Yawl(x, issie) -> Yawl(x, loreen))\nforall x (Carol(x, loreen) and Carol(loreen, leah) -> not Tense(loreen, issie))\nforall x (Yawl(x, madison) and not Yawl(madison, leah) -> Unbelted(madison))\nforall x (Yawl(x, issie) and Yawl(x, madison) -> Carol(issie, loreen))\n\nnot Tense(loreen, leah)\n\nnot Tense(loreen, leah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The lilias porter the grove. The grove does not eat the lysandra. The grove unify the odille. The grove is banner. The grove is jilted. The grove is deviate. The grove porter the lilias. The grove does not like the lysandra. The grove beckon the lysandra. The grove beckon the odille. The lysandra beckon the grove. The odille is jilted. The odille is not municipal. The odille porter the lysandra. The odille beckon the lilias. The odille beckon the grove. If the lilias porter the grove and the lilias does not eat the odille then the lilias porter the lysandra. If something porter the grove and it beckon the grove then it is banner. If something is banner then it is jilted. If the grove beckon the odille and the grove does not like the lysandra then the odille unify the grove. If something is municipal and it does not visit the lysandra then it beckon the grove. If something porter the grove and the grove porter the lilias then the grove does not eat the lysandra. If something beckon the odille and the odille does not visit the lilias then the odille is jilted. If something beckon the lysandra and it beckon the odille then the lysandra porter the grove. The lilias unify the grove.", "logic": "\nPorter(lilias, grove)\nnot Unify(grove, lysandra)\nUnify(grove, odille)\nBanner(grove)\nJilted(grove)\nDeviate(grove)\nPorter(grove, lilias)\nnot Porter(grove, lysandra)\nBeckon(grove, lysandra)\nBeckon(grove, odille)\nBeckon(lysandra, grove)\nJilted(odille)\nnot Municipal(odille)\nPorter(odille, lysandra)\nBeckon(odille, lilias)\nBeckon(odille, grove)\nPorter(lilias, grove) and not Unify(lilias, odille) -> Porter(lilias, lysandra)\nforall x (Porter(x, grove) and Beckon(x, grove) -> Banner(x))\nforall x (Banner(x) -> Jilted(x))\nBeckon(grove, odille) and not Porter(grove, lysandra) -> Unify(odille, grove)\nforall x (Municipal(x) and not Beckon(x, lysandra) -> Beckon(x, grove))\nforall x (Porter(x, grove) and Porter(grove, lilias) -> not Unify(grove, lysandra))\nforall x (Beckon(x, odille) and not Beckon(odille, lilias) -> Jilted(odille))\nforall x (Beckon(x, lysandra) and Beckon(x, odille) -> Porter(lysandra, grove))\n\nUnify(lilias, grove)\n\nUnify(lilias, grove) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The marisa edit the amalea. The amalea does not eat the boyce. The amalea strain the tremayne. The amalea is suggestive. The amalea is spacial. The amalea is south. The amalea edit the marisa. The amalea does not like the boyce. The amalea lust the boyce. The amalea lust the tremayne. The boyce lust the amalea. The tremayne is spacial. The tremayne is not unmanned. The tremayne edit the boyce. The tremayne lust the marisa. The tremayne lust the amalea. If the marisa edit the amalea and the marisa does not eat the tremayne then the marisa edit the boyce. If something edit the amalea and it lust the amalea then it is suggestive. If something is suggestive then it is spacial. If the amalea lust the tremayne and the amalea does not like the boyce then the tremayne strain the amalea. If something is unmanned and it does not visit the boyce then it lust the amalea. If something edit the amalea and the amalea edit the marisa then the amalea does not eat the boyce. If something lust the tremayne and the tremayne does not visit the marisa then the tremayne is spacial. If something lust the boyce and it lust the tremayne then the boyce edit the amalea. The tremayne does not eat the boyce.", "logic": "\nEdit(marisa, amalea)\nnot Strain(amalea, boyce)\nStrain(amalea, tremayne)\nSuggestive(amalea)\nSpacial(amalea)\nSouth(amalea)\nEdit(amalea, marisa)\nnot Edit(amalea, boyce)\nLust(amalea, boyce)\nLust(amalea, tremayne)\nLust(boyce, amalea)\nSpacial(tremayne)\nnot Unmanned(tremayne)\nEdit(tremayne, boyce)\nLust(tremayne, marisa)\nLust(tremayne, amalea)\nEdit(marisa, amalea) and not Strain(marisa, tremayne) -> Edit(marisa, boyce)\nforall x (Edit(x, amalea) and Lust(x, amalea) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Suggestive(x) -> Spacial(x))\nLust(amalea, tremayne) and not Edit(amalea, boyce) -> Strain(tremayne, amalea)\nforall x (Unmanned(x) and not Lust(x, boyce) -> Lust(x, amalea))\nforall x (Edit(x, amalea) and Edit(amalea, marisa) -> not Strain(amalea, boyce))\nforall x (Lust(x, tremayne) and not Lust(tremayne, marisa) -> Spacial(tremayne))\nforall x (Lust(x, boyce) and Lust(x, tremayne) -> Edit(boyce, amalea))\n\nnot Strain(tremayne, boyce)\n\nnot Strain(tremayne, boyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The nell hoot the brad. The brad does not eat the olly. The brad perennate the sharron. The brad is afraid. The brad is rigged. The brad is addable. The brad hoot the nell. The brad does not like the olly. The brad rack the olly. The brad rack the sharron. The olly rack the brad. The sharron is rigged. The sharron is not indicatory. The sharron hoot the olly. The sharron rack the nell. The sharron rack the brad. If the nell hoot the brad and the nell does not eat the sharron then the nell hoot the olly. If something hoot the brad and it rack the brad then it is afraid. If something is afraid then it is rigged. If the brad rack the sharron and the brad does not like the olly then the sharron perennate the brad. If something is indicatory and it does not visit the olly then it rack the brad. If something hoot the brad and the brad hoot the nell then the brad does not eat the olly. If something rack the sharron and the sharron does not visit the nell then the sharron is rigged. If something rack the olly and it rack the sharron then the olly hoot the brad. The nell is nice.", "logic": "\nHoot(nell, brad)\nnot Perennate(brad, olly)\nPerennate(brad, sharron)\nAfraid(brad)\nRigged(brad)\nAddable(brad)\nHoot(brad, nell)\nnot Hoot(brad, olly)\nRack(brad, olly)\nRack(brad, sharron)\nRack(olly, brad)\nRigged(sharron)\nnot Indicatory(sharron)\nHoot(sharron, olly)\nRack(sharron, nell)\nRack(sharron, brad)\nHoot(nell, brad) and not Perennate(nell, sharron) -> Hoot(nell, olly)\nforall x (Hoot(x, brad) and Rack(x, brad) -> Afraid(x))\nforall x (Afraid(x) -> Rigged(x))\nRack(brad, sharron) and not Hoot(brad, olly) -> Perennate(sharron, brad)\nforall x (Indicatory(x) and not Rack(x, olly) -> Rack(x, brad))\nforall x (Hoot(x, brad) and Hoot(brad, nell) -> not Perennate(brad, olly))\nforall x (Rack(x, sharron) and not Rack(sharron, nell) -> Rigged(sharron))\nforall x (Rack(x, olly) and Rack(x, sharron) -> Hoot(olly, brad))\n\nNice(nell)\n\nNice(nell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Viviene is petrous. Kaitlin is streetwise. Susannah is divers. If Kaitlin is divers and Kaitlin is appellate then Kaitlin is requisite. If something is petrous and appellate then it is streetwise. If Kaitlin is heterodox and Kaitlin is appellate then Kaitlin is streetwise. Smart, requisite things are heterodox. Smart things are heterodox. Blue things are appellate. Kaitlin is streetwise.", "logic": "\nPetrous(viviene)\nStreetwise(kaitlin)\nDivers(susannah)\nDivers(kaitlin) and Appellate(kaitlin) -> Requisite(kaitlin)\nforall x (Petrous(x) and Appellate(x) -> Streetwise(x))\nHeterodox(kaitlin) and Appellate(kaitlin) -> Streetwise(kaitlin)\nforall x (Streetwise(x) and Requisite(x) -> Heterodox(x))\nforall x (Streetwise(x) -> Heterodox(x))\nforall x (Petrous(x) -> Appellate(x))\n\nStreetwise(kaitlin)\n\ntherefore Streetwise(kaitlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Doroteya is redolent. Correy is abdicable. Aylmer is denuded. If Correy is denuded and Correy is cycloidal then Correy is rabid. If something is redolent and cycloidal then it is abdicable. If Correy is tarry and Correy is cycloidal then Correy is abdicable. Smart, rabid things are tarry. Smart things are tarry. Blue things are cycloidal. Aylmer is not denuded.", "logic": "\nRedolent(doroteya)\nAbdicable(correy)\nDenuded(aylmer)\nDenuded(correy) and Cycloidal(correy) -> Rabid(correy)\nforall x (Redolent(x) and Cycloidal(x) -> Abdicable(x))\nTarry(correy) and Cycloidal(correy) -> Abdicable(correy)\nforall x (Abdicable(x) and Rabid(x) -> Tarry(x))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) -> Tarry(x))\nforall x (Redolent(x) -> Cycloidal(x))\n\nnot Denuded(aylmer)\n\ntherefore Denuded(aylmer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Claus is empiric. Vivi is haywire. Delcine is unattached. If Vivi is unattached and Vivi is bastardly then Vivi is mnemonic. If something is empiric and bastardly then it is haywire. If Vivi is meshuga and Vivi is bastardly then Vivi is haywire. Smart, mnemonic things are meshuga. Smart things are meshuga. Blue things are bastardly. Vivi is meshuga.", "logic": "\nEmpiric(claus)\nHaywire(vivi)\nUnattached(delcine)\nUnattached(vivi) and Bastardly(vivi) -> Mnemonic(vivi)\nforall x (Empiric(x) and Bastardly(x) -> Haywire(x))\nMeshuga(vivi) and Bastardly(vivi) -> Haywire(vivi)\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Mnemonic(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Empiric(x) -> Bastardly(x))\n\nMeshuga(vivi)\n\nHaywire(vivi) and forall x (Haywire(x) -> Meshuga(x)) -> therefore Meshuga(vivi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Cathlene is stalwart. Farrah is sectorial. Kass is scrambled. If Farrah is scrambled and Farrah is beta then Farrah is thalloid. If something is stalwart and beta then it is sectorial. If Farrah is cognisable and Farrah is beta then Farrah is sectorial. Smart, thalloid things are cognisable. Smart things are cognisable. Blue things are beta. Cathlene is not beta.", "logic": "\nStalwart(cathlene)\nSectorial(farrah)\nScrambled(kass)\nScrambled(farrah) and Beta(farrah) -> Thalloid(farrah)\nforall x (Stalwart(x) and Beta(x) -> Sectorial(x))\nCognisable(farrah) and Beta(farrah) -> Sectorial(farrah)\nforall x (Sectorial(x) and Thalloid(x) -> Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Sectorial(x) -> Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Stalwart(x) -> Beta(x))\n\nnot Beta(cathlene)\n\nStalwart(cathlene) and forall x (Stalwart(x) -> Beta(x)) -> therefore Beta(cathlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Nana is homonymous. Nolie is remediable. Audre is expansive. If Nolie is expansive and Nolie is unending then Nolie is antiphonal. If something is homonymous and unending then it is remediable. If Nolie is bronzy and Nolie is unending then Nolie is remediable. Smart, antiphonal things are bronzy. Smart things are bronzy. Blue things are unending. Nana is remediable.", "logic": "\nHomonymous(nana)\nRemediable(nolie)\nExpansive(audre)\nExpansive(nolie) and Unending(nolie) -> Antiphonal(nolie)\nforall x (Homonymous(x) and Unending(x) -> Remediable(x))\nBronzy(nolie) and Unending(nolie) -> Remediable(nolie)\nforall x (Remediable(x) and Antiphonal(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nforall x (Homonymous(x) -> Unending(x))\n\nRemediable(nana)\n\nHomonymous(nana) and forall x (Homonymous(x) -> Unending(x)) -> therefore Unending(nana) Homonymous(nana) and Unending(nana) and forall x (Homonymous(x) and Unending(x) -> Remediable(x)) -> therefore Remediable(nana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Meyer is dishy. Ofelia is coreferent. Gilly is proved. If Ofelia is proved and Ofelia is slimy then Ofelia is grating. If something is dishy and slimy then it is coreferent. If Ofelia is boolean and Ofelia is slimy then Ofelia is coreferent. Smart, grating things are boolean. Smart things are boolean. Blue things are slimy. Meyer is not coreferent.", "logic": "\nDishy(meyer)\nCoreferent(ofelia)\nProved(gilly)\nProved(ofelia) and Slimy(ofelia) -> Grating(ofelia)\nforall x (Dishy(x) and Slimy(x) -> Coreferent(x))\nBoolean(ofelia) and Slimy(ofelia) -> Coreferent(ofelia)\nforall x (Coreferent(x) and Grating(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Coreferent(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Dishy(x) -> Slimy(x))\n\nnot Coreferent(meyer)\n\nDishy(meyer) and forall x (Dishy(x) -> Slimy(x)) -> therefore Slimy(meyer) Dishy(meyer) and Slimy(meyer) and forall x (Dishy(x) and Slimy(x) -> Coreferent(x)) -> therefore Coreferent(meyer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Dorit is untreated. Anitra is lissome. Lovell is coalesced. If Anitra is coalesced and Anitra is bionomical then Anitra is withdrawn. If something is untreated and bionomical then it is lissome. If Anitra is neoliberal and Anitra is bionomical then Anitra is lissome. Smart, withdrawn things are neoliberal. Smart things are neoliberal. Blue things are bionomical. Dorit is neoliberal.", "logic": "\nUntreated(dorit)\nLissome(anitra)\nCoalesced(lovell)\nCoalesced(anitra) and Bionomical(anitra) -> Withdrawn(anitra)\nforall x (Untreated(x) and Bionomical(x) -> Lissome(x))\nNeoliberal(anitra) and Bionomical(anitra) -> Lissome(anitra)\nforall x (Lissome(x) and Withdrawn(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (Lissome(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (Untreated(x) -> Bionomical(x))\n\nNeoliberal(dorit)\n\nUntreated(dorit) and forall x (Untreated(x) -> Bionomical(x)) -> therefore Bionomical(dorit) Untreated(dorit) and Bionomical(dorit) and forall x (Untreated(x) and Bionomical(x) -> Lissome(x)) -> therefore Lissome(dorit) Lissome(dorit) and forall x (Lissome(x) -> Neoliberal(x)) -> therefore Neoliberal(dorit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Dorey is teutonic. Ashleigh is repentant. Ivie is intoned. If Ashleigh is intoned and Ashleigh is germinal then Ashleigh is breathed. If something is teutonic and germinal then it is repentant. If Ashleigh is unflawed and Ashleigh is germinal then Ashleigh is repentant. Smart, breathed things are unflawed. Smart things are unflawed. Blue things are germinal. Dorey is not unflawed.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(dorey)\nRepentant(ashleigh)\nIntoned(ivie)\nIntoned(ashleigh) and Germinal(ashleigh) -> Breathed(ashleigh)\nforall x (Teutonic(x) and Germinal(x) -> Repentant(x))\nUnflawed(ashleigh) and Germinal(ashleigh) -> Repentant(ashleigh)\nforall x (Repentant(x) and Breathed(x) -> Unflawed(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Unflawed(x))\nforall x (Teutonic(x) -> Germinal(x))\n\nnot Unflawed(dorey)\n\nTeutonic(dorey) and forall x (Teutonic(x) -> Germinal(x)) -> therefore Germinal(dorey) Teutonic(dorey) and Germinal(dorey) and forall x (Teutonic(x) and Germinal(x) -> Repentant(x)) -> therefore Repentant(dorey) Repentant(dorey) and forall x (Repentant(x) -> Unflawed(x)) -> therefore Unflawed(dorey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Corly is warring. Cindelyn is viviparous. Brenna is posted. If Cindelyn is posted and Cindelyn is imperative then Cindelyn is gimbaled. If something is warring and imperative then it is viviparous. If Cindelyn is septate and Cindelyn is imperative then Cindelyn is viviparous. Smart, gimbaled things are septate. Smart things are septate. Blue things are imperative. Brenna is not septate.", "logic": "\nWarring(corly)\nViviparous(cindelyn)\nPosted(brenna)\nPosted(cindelyn) and Imperative(cindelyn) -> Gimbaled(cindelyn)\nforall x (Warring(x) and Imperative(x) -> Viviparous(x))\nSeptate(cindelyn) and Imperative(cindelyn) -> Viviparous(cindelyn)\nforall x (Viviparous(x) and Gimbaled(x) -> Septate(x))\nforall x (Viviparous(x) -> Septate(x))\nforall x (Warring(x) -> Imperative(x))\n\nnot Septate(brenna)\n\nforall x (Viviparous(x) -> Septate(x)) <- forall x (Warring(x) and Imperative(x) -> Viviparous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Theodor is secluded. Isabella is ankylotic. Preston is mercurous. If Isabella is mercurous and Isabella is ghostlike then Isabella is inertial. If something is secluded and ghostlike then it is ankylotic. If Isabella is woolen and Isabella is ghostlike then Isabella is ankylotic. Smart, inertial things are woolen. Smart things are woolen. Blue things are ghostlike. Isabella is ghostlike.", "logic": "\nSecluded(theodor)\nAnkylotic(isabella)\nMercurous(preston)\nMercurous(isabella) and Ghostlike(isabella) -> Inertial(isabella)\nforall x (Secluded(x) and Ghostlike(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\nWoolen(isabella) and Ghostlike(isabella) -> Ankylotic(isabella)\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) and Inertial(x) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Secluded(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\n\nGhostlike(isabella)\n\nforall x (Secluded(x) -> Ghostlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Mikhail is possible. Batsheva is untidy. Norry is buffeted. If Batsheva is buffeted and Batsheva is smoggy then Batsheva is sweetheart. If something is possible and smoggy then it is untidy. If Batsheva is germicidal and Batsheva is smoggy then Batsheva is untidy. Smart, sweetheart things are germicidal. Smart things are germicidal. Blue things are smoggy. Batsheva is not sweetheart.", "logic": "\nPossible(mikhail)\nUntidy(batsheva)\nBuffeted(norry)\nBuffeted(batsheva) and Smoggy(batsheva) -> Sweetheart(batsheva)\nforall x (Possible(x) and Smoggy(x) -> Untidy(x))\nGermicidal(batsheva) and Smoggy(batsheva) -> Untidy(batsheva)\nforall x (Untidy(x) and Sweetheart(x) -> Germicidal(x))\nforall x (Untidy(x) -> Germicidal(x))\nforall x (Possible(x) -> Smoggy(x))\n\nnot Sweetheart(batsheva)\n\nBuffeted(batsheva) and Smoggy(batsheva) -> Sweetheart(batsheva) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Wain is proof. Vic is perturbing. Sterne is boned. If Vic is boned and Vic is unassisted then Vic is splanchnic. If something is proof and unassisted then it is perturbing. If Vic is auditive and Vic is unassisted then Vic is perturbing. Smart, splanchnic things are auditive. Smart things are auditive. Blue things are unassisted. Sterne is perturbing.", "logic": "\nProof(wain)\nPerturbing(vic)\nBoned(sterne)\nBoned(vic) and Unassisted(vic) -> Splanchnic(vic)\nforall x (Proof(x) and Unassisted(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nAuditive(vic) and Unassisted(vic) -> Perturbing(vic)\nforall x (Perturbing(x) and Splanchnic(x) -> Auditive(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) -> Auditive(x))\nforall x (Proof(x) -> Unassisted(x))\n\nPerturbing(sterne)\n\nforall x (Proof(x) and Unassisted(x) -> Perturbing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Flossie is commensal. Maud is thoughtful. Keith is medial. If Maud is medial and Maud is listless then Maud is acervate. If something is commensal and listless then it is thoughtful. If Maud is voiceless and Maud is listless then Maud is thoughtful. Smart, acervate things are voiceless. Smart things are voiceless. Blue things are listless. Maud is not green.", "logic": "\nCommensal(flossie)\nThoughtful(maud)\nMedial(keith)\nMedial(maud) and Listless(maud) -> Acervate(maud)\nforall x (Commensal(x) and Listless(x) -> Thoughtful(x))\nVoiceless(maud) and Listless(maud) -> Thoughtful(maud)\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) and Acervate(x) -> Voiceless(x))\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) -> Voiceless(x))\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Listless(x))\n\nnot Green(maud)\n\nnot Green(maud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Janet is thermoset. Maggy is uttermost. Lin is sympatric. If Maggy is sympatric and Maggy is sociable then Maggy is unspoiled. If something is thermoset and sociable then it is uttermost. If Maggy is valved and Maggy is sociable then Maggy is uttermost. Smart, unspoiled things are valved. Smart things are valved. Blue things are sociable. Lin is green.", "logic": "\nThermoset(janet)\nUttermost(maggy)\nSympatric(lin)\nSympatric(maggy) and Sociable(maggy) -> Unspoiled(maggy)\nforall x (Thermoset(x) and Sociable(x) -> Uttermost(x))\nValved(maggy) and Sociable(maggy) -> Uttermost(maggy)\nforall x (Uttermost(x) and Unspoiled(x) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Thermoset(x) -> Sociable(x))\n\nGreen(lin)\n\nGreen(lin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Stefano is acoustic. Adelaide is oddish. Jule is bursal. If Adelaide is bursal and Adelaide is ultimate then Adelaide is lxvi. If something is acoustic and ultimate then it is oddish. If Adelaide is unexpended and Adelaide is ultimate then Adelaide is oddish. Smart, lxvi things are unexpended. Smart things are unexpended. Blue things are ultimate. Adelaide is not bursal.", "logic": "\nAcoustic(stefano)\nOddish(adelaide)\nBursal(jule)\nBursal(adelaide) and Ultimate(adelaide) -> Lxvi(adelaide)\nforall x (Acoustic(x) and Ultimate(x) -> Oddish(x))\nUnexpended(adelaide) and Ultimate(adelaide) -> Oddish(adelaide)\nforall x (Oddish(x) and Lxvi(x) -> Unexpended(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Unexpended(x))\nforall x (Acoustic(x) -> Ultimate(x))\n\nnot Bursal(adelaide)\n\nnot Bursal(adelaide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Nicholle is shredded. Cammy is oversize. Isabella is scandalous. If Cammy is scandalous and Cammy is shapely then Cammy is gratifying. If something is shredded and shapely then it is oversize. If Cammy is hempen and Cammy is shapely then Cammy is oversize. Smart, gratifying things are hempen. Smart things are hempen. Blue things are shapely. Nicholle is green.", "logic": "\nShredded(nicholle)\nOversize(cammy)\nScandalous(isabella)\nScandalous(cammy) and Shapely(cammy) -> Gratifying(cammy)\nforall x (Shredded(x) and Shapely(x) -> Oversize(x))\nHempen(cammy) and Shapely(cammy) -> Oversize(cammy)\nforall x (Oversize(x) and Gratifying(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Shredded(x) -> Shapely(x))\n\nGreen(nicholle)\n\nGreen(nicholle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Rutger is ubiquitous. Marven is not ubiquitous. Marven is not adulterous. All undeserved things are unbiassed. All undeserved, atonal things are not torturous. If something is unbiassed and ubiquitous then it is undeserved. All unbiassed things are atonal. If Rutger is ubiquitous then Rutger is unbiassed. If something is undeserved and not torturous then it is adulterous. If something is adulterous and not ubiquitous then it is quelled. If something is ubiquitous then it is not quelled. Marven is not ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nUbiquitous(rutger)\nnot Ubiquitous(marven)\nnot Adulterous(marven)\nforall x (Undeserved(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Undeserved(x) and Atonal(x) -> not Torturous(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Ubiquitous(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Atonal(x))\nUbiquitous(rutger) -> Unbiassed(rutger)\nforall x (Undeserved(x) and not Torturous(x) -> Adulterous(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) and not Ubiquitous(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> not Quelled(x))\n\nnot Ubiquitous(marven)\n\ntherefore not Ubiquitous(marven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Penrod is tunisian. Schroeder is not tunisian. Schroeder is not mercuric. All unsilenced things are campy. All unsilenced, longish things are not cosmogonic. If something is campy and tunisian then it is unsilenced. All campy things are longish. If Penrod is tunisian then Penrod is campy. If something is unsilenced and not cosmogonic then it is mercuric. If something is mercuric and not tunisian then it is newfangled. If something is tunisian then it is not newfangled. Schroeder is mercuric.", "logic": "\nTunisian(penrod)\nnot Tunisian(schroeder)\nnot Mercuric(schroeder)\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Campy(x))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) and Longish(x) -> not Cosmogonic(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) and Tunisian(x) -> Unsilenced(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Longish(x))\nTunisian(penrod) -> Campy(penrod)\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) and not Cosmogonic(x) -> Mercuric(x))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) and not Tunisian(x) -> Newfangled(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> not Newfangled(x))\n\nMercuric(schroeder)\n\ntherefore not Mercuric(schroeder)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Quintana is talkative. Flynn is not talkative. Flynn is not plaintive. All scenic things are gleeful. All scenic, continuous things are not unbounded. If something is gleeful and talkative then it is scenic. All gleeful things are continuous. If Quintana is talkative then Quintana is gleeful. If something is scenic and not unbounded then it is plaintive. If something is plaintive and not talkative then it is moony. If something is talkative then it is not moony. Quintana is gleeful.", "logic": "\nTalkative(quintana)\nnot Talkative(flynn)\nnot Plaintive(flynn)\nforall x (Scenic(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Scenic(x) and Continuous(x) -> not Unbounded(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) and Talkative(x) -> Scenic(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Continuous(x))\nTalkative(quintana) -> Gleeful(quintana)\nforall x (Scenic(x) and not Unbounded(x) -> Plaintive(x))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) and not Talkative(x) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Talkative(x) -> not Moony(x))\n\nGleeful(quintana)\n\nTalkative(quintana) and Talkative(quintana) -> Gleeful(quintana) -> therefore Gleeful(quintana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Andri is thirdhand. Portia is not thirdhand. Portia is not paunchy. All epicurean things are medicative. All epicurean, extreme things are not purposive. If something is medicative and thirdhand then it is epicurean. All medicative things are extreme. If Andri is thirdhand then Andri is medicative. If something is epicurean and not purposive then it is paunchy. If something is paunchy and not thirdhand then it is genealogic. If something is thirdhand then it is not genealogic. Andri is genealogic.", "logic": "\nThirdhand(andri)\nnot Thirdhand(portia)\nnot Paunchy(portia)\nforall x (Epicurean(x) -> Medicative(x))\nforall x (Epicurean(x) and Extreme(x) -> not Purposive(x))\nforall x (Medicative(x) and Thirdhand(x) -> Epicurean(x))\nforall x (Medicative(x) -> Extreme(x))\nThirdhand(andri) -> Medicative(andri)\nforall x (Epicurean(x) and not Purposive(x) -> Paunchy(x))\nforall x (Paunchy(x) and not Thirdhand(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) -> not Genealogic(x))\n\nGenealogic(andri)\n\nThirdhand(andri) and forall x (Thirdhand(x) -> not Genealogic(x)) -> therefore not Genealogic(andri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Braden is stative. Junette is not stative. Junette is not censored. All rotated things are formative. All rotated, searching things are not trillion. If something is formative and stative then it is rotated. All formative things are searching. If Braden is stative then Braden is formative. If something is rotated and not trillion then it is censored. If something is censored and not stative then it is acetabular. If something is stative then it is not acetabular. Braden is rotated.", "logic": "\nStative(braden)\nnot Stative(junette)\nnot Censored(junette)\nforall x (Rotated(x) -> Formative(x))\nforall x (Rotated(x) and Searching(x) -> not Trillion(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) and Stative(x) -> Rotated(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) -> Searching(x))\nStative(braden) -> Formative(braden)\nforall x (Rotated(x) and not Trillion(x) -> Censored(x))\nforall x (Censored(x) and not Stative(x) -> Acetabular(x))\nforall x (Stative(x) -> not Acetabular(x))\n\nRotated(braden)\n\nStative(braden) and Stative(braden) -> Formative(braden) -> therefore Formative(braden) Formative(braden) and Stative(braden) and forall x (Formative(x) and Stative(x) -> Rotated(x)) -> therefore Rotated(braden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Florida is decussate. Amelina is not decussate. Amelina is not adulterant. All pestilent things are cogitable. All pestilent, mournful things are not expiable. If something is cogitable and decussate then it is pestilent. All cogitable things are mournful. If Florida is decussate then Florida is cogitable. If something is pestilent and not expiable then it is adulterant. If something is adulterant and not decussate then it is discrepant. If something is decussate then it is not discrepant. Florida is not mournful.", "logic": "\nDecussate(florida)\nnot Decussate(amelina)\nnot Adulterant(amelina)\nforall x (Pestilent(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nforall x (Pestilent(x) and Mournful(x) -> not Expiable(x))\nforall x (Cogitable(x) and Decussate(x) -> Pestilent(x))\nforall x (Cogitable(x) -> Mournful(x))\nDecussate(florida) -> Cogitable(florida)\nforall x (Pestilent(x) and not Expiable(x) -> Adulterant(x))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) and not Decussate(x) -> Discrepant(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) -> not Discrepant(x))\n\nnot Mournful(florida)\n\nDecussate(florida) and Decussate(florida) -> Cogitable(florida) -> therefore Cogitable(florida) Cogitable(florida) and forall x (Cogitable(x) -> Mournful(x)) -> therefore Mournful(florida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Sky is weird. Marris is not weird. Marris is not supposed. All sentential things are superhuman. All sentential, gushing things are not anorthitic. If something is superhuman and weird then it is sentential. All superhuman things are gushing. If Sky is weird then Sky is superhuman. If something is sentential and not anorthitic then it is supposed. If something is supposed and not weird then it is genoese. If something is weird then it is not genoese. Sky is not anorthitic.", "logic": "\nWeird(sky)\nnot Weird(marris)\nnot Supposed(marris)\nforall x (Sentential(x) -> Superhuman(x))\nforall x (Sentential(x) and Gushing(x) -> not Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Superhuman(x) and Weird(x) -> Sentential(x))\nforall x (Superhuman(x) -> Gushing(x))\nWeird(sky) -> Superhuman(sky)\nforall x (Sentential(x) and not Anorthitic(x) -> Supposed(x))\nforall x (Supposed(x) and not Weird(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Weird(x) -> not Genoese(x))\n\nnot Anorthitic(sky)\n\nWeird(sky) and Weird(sky) -> Superhuman(sky) -> therefore Superhuman(sky) Superhuman(sky) and Weird(sky) and forall x (Superhuman(x) and Weird(x) -> Sentential(x)) -> therefore Sentential(sky) Weird(sky) and Weird(sky) -> Superhuman(sky) -> therefore Superhuman(sky) Superhuman(sky) and forall x (Superhuman(x) -> Gushing(x)) -> therefore Gushing(sky) Sentential(sky) and Gushing(sky) and forall x (Sentential(x) and Gushing(x) -> not Anorthitic(x)) -> therefore not Anorthitic(sky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Delores is acerose. Corrine is not acerose. Corrine is not backstair. All dapper things are homegrown. All dapper, agamous things are not eccentric. If something is homegrown and acerose then it is dapper. All homegrown things are agamous. If Delores is acerose then Delores is homegrown. If something is dapper and not eccentric then it is backstair. If something is backstair and not acerose then it is lactating. If something is acerose then it is not lactating. Delores is eccentric.", "logic": "\nAcerose(delores)\nnot Acerose(corrine)\nnot Backstair(corrine)\nforall x (Dapper(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Dapper(x) and Agamous(x) -> not Eccentric(x))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) and Acerose(x) -> Dapper(x))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) -> Agamous(x))\nAcerose(delores) -> Homegrown(delores)\nforall x (Dapper(x) and not Eccentric(x) -> Backstair(x))\nforall x (Backstair(x) and not Acerose(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Acerose(x) -> not Lactating(x))\n\nEccentric(delores)\n\nAcerose(delores) and Acerose(delores) -> Homegrown(delores) -> therefore Homegrown(delores) Homegrown(delores) and Acerose(delores) and forall x (Homegrown(x) and Acerose(x) -> Dapper(x)) -> therefore Dapper(delores) Acerose(delores) and Acerose(delores) -> Homegrown(delores) -> therefore Homegrown(delores) Homegrown(delores) and forall x (Homegrown(x) -> Agamous(x)) -> therefore Agamous(delores) Dapper(delores) and Agamous(delores) and forall x (Dapper(x) and Agamous(x) -> not Eccentric(x)) -> therefore not Eccentric(delores)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Doyle is kookie. Raphael is not kookie. Raphael is not unabused. All stubbled things are fevered. All stubbled, raised things are not berrylike. If something is fevered and kookie then it is stubbled. All fevered things are raised. If Doyle is kookie then Doyle is fevered. If something is stubbled and not berrylike then it is unabused. If something is unabused and not kookie then it is saclike. If something is kookie then it is not saclike. Raphael is not raised.", "logic": "\nKookie(doyle)\nnot Kookie(raphael)\nnot Unabused(raphael)\nforall x (Stubbled(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and Raised(x) -> not Berrylike(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) and Kookie(x) -> Stubbled(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) -> Raised(x))\nKookie(doyle) -> Fevered(doyle)\nforall x (Stubbled(x) and not Berrylike(x) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and not Kookie(x) -> Saclike(x))\nforall x (Kookie(x) -> not Saclike(x))\n\nnot Raised(raphael)\n\nforall x (Fevered(x) -> Raised(x)) <- forall x (Stubbled(x) -> Fevered(x)) <- forall x (Fevered(x) and Kookie(x) -> Stubbled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Bronson is astragalar. Aloysia is not astragalar. Aloysia is not chartless. All phallic things are clownlike. All phallic, illative things are not avuncular. If something is clownlike and astragalar then it is phallic. All clownlike things are illative. If Bronson is astragalar then Bronson is clownlike. If something is phallic and not avuncular then it is chartless. If something is chartless and not astragalar then it is bugged. If something is astragalar then it is not bugged. Aloysia is phallic.", "logic": "\nAstragalar(bronson)\nnot Astragalar(aloysia)\nnot Chartless(aloysia)\nforall x (Phallic(x) -> Clownlike(x))\nforall x (Phallic(x) and Illative(x) -> not Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) and Astragalar(x) -> Phallic(x))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) -> Illative(x))\nAstragalar(bronson) -> Clownlike(bronson)\nforall x (Phallic(x) and not Avuncular(x) -> Chartless(x))\nforall x (Chartless(x) and not Astragalar(x) -> Bugged(x))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> not Bugged(x))\n\nPhallic(aloysia)\n\nforall x (Clownlike(x) and Astragalar(x) -> Phallic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Alicea is acervate. Venita is not acervate. Venita is not pediatric. All brisk things are briton. All brisk, furrowed things are not savage. If something is briton and acervate then it is brisk. All briton things are furrowed. If Alicea is acervate then Alicea is briton. If something is brisk and not savage then it is pediatric. If something is pediatric and not acervate then it is coplanar. If something is acervate then it is not coplanar. Venita is not coplanar.", "logic": "\nAcervate(alicea)\nnot Acervate(venita)\nnot Pediatric(venita)\nforall x (Brisk(x) -> Briton(x))\nforall x (Brisk(x) and Furrowed(x) -> not Savage(x))\nforall x (Briton(x) and Acervate(x) -> Brisk(x))\nforall x (Briton(x) -> Furrowed(x))\nAcervate(alicea) -> Briton(alicea)\nforall x (Brisk(x) and not Savage(x) -> Pediatric(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and not Acervate(x) -> Coplanar(x))\nforall x (Acervate(x) -> not Coplanar(x))\n\nnot Coplanar(venita)\n\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and not Acervate(x) -> Coplanar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Magdaia is packaged. Tucker is not packaged. Tucker is not wilsonian. All beautiful things are quebecois. All beautiful, climatical things are not blighted. If something is quebecois and packaged then it is beautiful. All quebecois things are climatical. If Magdaia is packaged then Magdaia is quebecois. If something is beautiful and not blighted then it is wilsonian. If something is wilsonian and not packaged then it is honied. If something is packaged then it is not honied. Tucker is quebecois.", "logic": "\nPackaged(magdaia)\nnot Packaged(tucker)\nnot Wilsonian(tucker)\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Quebecois(x))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and Climatical(x) -> not Blighted(x))\nforall x (Quebecois(x) and Packaged(x) -> Beautiful(x))\nforall x (Quebecois(x) -> Climatical(x))\nPackaged(magdaia) -> Quebecois(magdaia)\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and not Blighted(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\nforall x (Wilsonian(x) and not Packaged(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> not Honied(x))\n\nQuebecois(tucker)\n\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Quebecois(x)) <- forall x (Quebecois(x) and Packaged(x) -> Beautiful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "The phil puke the leora. The phil imbed the leora. The phil is subfusc. The phil untune the aurilia. The phil untune the leora. The aurilia is syllabic. The aurilia untune the phil. The leora puke the aurilia. The leora imbed the phil. The leora imbed the aurilia. The leora is creaky. The leora is gaga. The leora is subfusc. The leora is moist. The leora untune the phil. The leora untune the aurilia. If something untune the aurilia then it imbed the aurilia. If something is creaky then it untune the aurilia. If something puke the leora and it untune the aurilia then it puke the aurilia. If the leora is gaga and the leora imbed the aurilia then the aurilia is creaky. If the leora puke the phil then the leora imbed the phil. If something is syllabic and it imbed the leora then it puke the aurilia. The phil untune the leora.", "logic": "\nPuke(phil, leora)\nImbed(phil, leora)\nSubfusc(phil)\nUntune(phil, aurilia)\nUntune(phil, leora)\nSyllabic(aurilia)\nUntune(aurilia, phil)\nPuke(leora, aurilia)\nImbed(leora, phil)\nImbed(leora, aurilia)\nCreaky(leora)\nGaga(leora)\nSubfusc(leora)\nMoist(leora)\nUntune(leora, phil)\nUntune(leora, aurilia)\nforall x (Untune(x, aurilia) -> Imbed(x, aurilia))\nforall x (Creaky(x) -> Untune(x, aurilia))\nforall x (Puke(x, leora) and Untune(x, aurilia) -> Puke(x, aurilia))\nGaga(leora) and Imbed(leora, aurilia) -> Creaky(aurilia)\nPuke(leora, phil) -> Imbed(leora, phil)\nforall x (Syllabic(x) and Imbed(x, leora) -> Puke(x, aurilia))\n\nUntune(phil, leora)\n\ntherefore Untune(phil, leora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The sibelle grip the virgil. The sibelle unload the virgil. The sibelle is gainly. The sibelle wedge the hadley. The sibelle wedge the virgil. The hadley is glittering. The hadley wedge the sibelle. The virgil grip the hadley. The virgil unload the sibelle. The virgil unload the hadley. The virgil is livable. The virgil is undecided. The virgil is gainly. The virgil is rearmost. The virgil wedge the sibelle. The virgil wedge the hadley. If something wedge the hadley then it unload the hadley. If something is livable then it wedge the hadley. If something grip the virgil and it wedge the hadley then it grip the hadley. If the virgil is undecided and the virgil unload the hadley then the hadley is livable. If the virgil grip the sibelle then the virgil unload the sibelle. If something is glittering and it unload the virgil then it grip the hadley. The hadley is not glittering.", "logic": "\nGrip(sibelle, virgil)\nUnload(sibelle, virgil)\nGainly(sibelle)\nWedge(sibelle, hadley)\nWedge(sibelle, virgil)\nGlittering(hadley)\nWedge(hadley, sibelle)\nGrip(virgil, hadley)\nUnload(virgil, sibelle)\nUnload(virgil, hadley)\nLivable(virgil)\nUndecided(virgil)\nGainly(virgil)\nRearmost(virgil)\nWedge(virgil, sibelle)\nWedge(virgil, hadley)\nforall x (Wedge(x, hadley) -> Unload(x, hadley))\nforall x (Livable(x) -> Wedge(x, hadley))\nforall x (Grip(x, virgil) and Wedge(x, hadley) -> Grip(x, hadley))\nUndecided(virgil) and Unload(virgil, hadley) -> Livable(hadley)\nGrip(virgil, sibelle) -> Unload(virgil, sibelle)\nforall x (Glittering(x) and Unload(x, virgil) -> Grip(x, hadley))\n\nnot Glittering(hadley)\n\ntherefore Glittering(hadley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The adrien unyoke the jess. The adrien privatise the jess. The adrien is entire. The adrien speckle the dionis. The adrien speckle the jess. The dionis is unmelted. The dionis speckle the adrien. The jess unyoke the dionis. The jess privatise the adrien. The jess privatise the dionis. The jess is shipboard. The jess is derivable. The jess is entire. The jess is moist. The jess speckle the adrien. The jess speckle the dionis. If something speckle the dionis then it privatise the dionis. If something is shipboard then it speckle the dionis. If something unyoke the jess and it speckle the dionis then it unyoke the dionis. If the jess is derivable and the jess privatise the dionis then the dionis is shipboard. If the jess unyoke the adrien then the jess privatise the adrien. If something is unmelted and it privatise the jess then it unyoke the dionis. The adrien privatise the dionis.", "logic": "\nUnyoke(adrien, jess)\nPrivatise(adrien, jess)\nEntire(adrien)\nSpeckle(adrien, dionis)\nSpeckle(adrien, jess)\nUnmelted(dionis)\nSpeckle(dionis, adrien)\nUnyoke(jess, dionis)\nPrivatise(jess, adrien)\nPrivatise(jess, dionis)\nShipboard(jess)\nDerivable(jess)\nEntire(jess)\nMoist(jess)\nSpeckle(jess, adrien)\nSpeckle(jess, dionis)\nforall x (Speckle(x, dionis) -> Privatise(x, dionis))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) -> Speckle(x, dionis))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, jess) and Speckle(x, dionis) -> Unyoke(x, dionis))\nDerivable(jess) and Privatise(jess, dionis) -> Shipboard(dionis)\nUnyoke(jess, adrien) -> Privatise(jess, adrien)\nforall x (Unmelted(x) and Privatise(x, jess) -> Unyoke(x, dionis))\n\nPrivatise(adrien, dionis)\n\nSpeckle(adrien, dionis) and forall x (Speckle(x, dionis) -> Privatise(x, dionis)) -> therefore Privatise(adrien, dionis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The chadd diet the pippa. The chadd stalinize the pippa. The chadd is estrous. The chadd memorise the shantee. The chadd memorise the pippa. The shantee is intriguing. The shantee memorise the chadd. The pippa diet the shantee. The pippa stalinize the chadd. The pippa stalinize the shantee. The pippa is wired. The pippa is jocose. The pippa is estrous. The pippa is expedient. The pippa memorise the chadd. The pippa memorise the shantee. If something memorise the shantee then it stalinize the shantee. If something is wired then it memorise the shantee. If something diet the pippa and it memorise the shantee then it diet the shantee. If the pippa is jocose and the pippa stalinize the shantee then the shantee is wired. If the pippa diet the chadd then the pippa stalinize the chadd. If something is intriguing and it stalinize the pippa then it diet the shantee. The shantee is not wired.", "logic": "\nDiet(chadd, pippa)\nStalinize(chadd, pippa)\nEstrous(chadd)\nMemorise(chadd, shantee)\nMemorise(chadd, pippa)\nIntriguing(shantee)\nMemorise(shantee, chadd)\nDiet(pippa, shantee)\nStalinize(pippa, chadd)\nStalinize(pippa, shantee)\nWired(pippa)\nJocose(pippa)\nEstrous(pippa)\nExpedient(pippa)\nMemorise(pippa, chadd)\nMemorise(pippa, shantee)\nforall x (Memorise(x, shantee) -> Stalinize(x, shantee))\nforall x (Wired(x) -> Memorise(x, shantee))\nforall x (Diet(x, pippa) and Memorise(x, shantee) -> Diet(x, shantee))\nJocose(pippa) and Stalinize(pippa, shantee) -> Wired(shantee)\nDiet(pippa, chadd) -> Stalinize(pippa, chadd)\nforall x (Intriguing(x) and Stalinize(x, pippa) -> Diet(x, shantee))\n\nnot Wired(shantee)\n\nJocose(pippa) and Stalinize(pippa, shantee) and Jocose(pippa) and Stalinize(pippa, shantee) -> Wired(shantee) -> therefore Wired(shantee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The dynah manhandle the josefa. The dynah halter the josefa. The dynah is fastened. The dynah pompadour the gracie. The dynah pompadour the josefa. The gracie is enmeshed. The gracie pompadour the dynah. The josefa manhandle the gracie. The josefa halter the dynah. The josefa halter the gracie. The josefa is gushing. The josefa is basilar. The josefa is fastened. The josefa is aggressive. The josefa pompadour the dynah. The josefa pompadour the gracie. If something pompadour the gracie then it halter the gracie. If something is gushing then it pompadour the gracie. If something manhandle the josefa and it pompadour the gracie then it manhandle the gracie. If the josefa is basilar and the josefa halter the gracie then the gracie is gushing. If the josefa manhandle the dynah then the josefa halter the dynah. If something is enmeshed and it halter the josefa then it manhandle the gracie. The gracie pompadour the gracie.", "logic": "\nManhandle(dynah, josefa)\nHalter(dynah, josefa)\nFastened(dynah)\nPompadour(dynah, gracie)\nPompadour(dynah, josefa)\nEnmeshed(gracie)\nPompadour(gracie, dynah)\nManhandle(josefa, gracie)\nHalter(josefa, dynah)\nHalter(josefa, gracie)\nGushing(josefa)\nBasilar(josefa)\nFastened(josefa)\nAggressive(josefa)\nPompadour(josefa, dynah)\nPompadour(josefa, gracie)\nforall x (Pompadour(x, gracie) -> Halter(x, gracie))\nforall x (Gushing(x) -> Pompadour(x, gracie))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, josefa) and Pompadour(x, gracie) -> Manhandle(x, gracie))\nBasilar(josefa) and Halter(josefa, gracie) -> Gushing(gracie)\nManhandle(josefa, dynah) -> Halter(josefa, dynah)\nforall x (Enmeshed(x) and Halter(x, josefa) -> Manhandle(x, gracie))\n\nPompadour(gracie, gracie)\n\nBasilar(josefa) and Halter(josefa, gracie) and Basilar(josefa) and Halter(josefa, gracie) -> Gushing(gracie) -> therefore Gushing(gracie) Gushing(gracie) and forall x (Gushing(x) -> Pompadour(x, gracie)) -> therefore Pompadour(gracie, gracie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The joyann boast the flower. The joyann rejoin the flower. The joyann is uniovular. The joyann cram the colleen. The joyann cram the flower. The colleen is appetising. The colleen cram the joyann. The flower boast the colleen. The flower rejoin the joyann. The flower rejoin the colleen. The flower is xxviii. The flower is spick. The flower is uniovular. The flower is motored. The flower cram the joyann. The flower cram the colleen. If something cram the colleen then it rejoin the colleen. If something is xxviii then it cram the colleen. If something boast the flower and it cram the colleen then it boast the colleen. If the flower is spick and the flower rejoin the colleen then the colleen is xxviii. If the flower boast the joyann then the flower rejoin the joyann. If something is appetising and it rejoin the flower then it boast the colleen. The colleen does not like the colleen.", "logic": "\nBoast(joyann, flower)\nRejoin(joyann, flower)\nUniovular(joyann)\nCram(joyann, colleen)\nCram(joyann, flower)\nAppetising(colleen)\nCram(colleen, joyann)\nBoast(flower, colleen)\nRejoin(flower, joyann)\nRejoin(flower, colleen)\nXxviii(flower)\nSpick(flower)\nUniovular(flower)\nMotored(flower)\nCram(flower, joyann)\nCram(flower, colleen)\nforall x (Cram(x, colleen) -> Rejoin(x, colleen))\nforall x (Xxviii(x) -> Cram(x, colleen))\nforall x (Boast(x, flower) and Cram(x, colleen) -> Boast(x, colleen))\nSpick(flower) and Rejoin(flower, colleen) -> Xxviii(colleen)\nBoast(flower, joyann) -> Rejoin(flower, joyann)\nforall x (Appetising(x) and Rejoin(x, flower) -> Boast(x, colleen))\n\nnot Cram(colleen, colleen)\n\nSpick(flower) and Rejoin(flower, colleen) and Spick(flower) and Rejoin(flower, colleen) -> Xxviii(colleen) -> therefore Xxviii(colleen) Xxviii(colleen) and forall x (Xxviii(x) -> Cram(x, colleen)) -> therefore Cram(colleen, colleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The regine doss the gus. The regine festoon the gus. The regine is gory. The regine haul the kent. The regine haul the gus. The kent is unsuasible. The kent haul the regine. The gus doss the kent. The gus festoon the regine. The gus festoon the kent. The gus is pitiful. The gus is pyretic. The gus is gory. The gus is decussate. The gus haul the regine. The gus haul the kent. If something haul the kent then it festoon the kent. If something is pitiful then it haul the kent. If something doss the gus and it haul the kent then it doss the kent. If the gus is pyretic and the gus festoon the kent then the kent is pitiful. If the gus doss the regine then the gus festoon the regine. If something is unsuasible and it festoon the gus then it doss the kent. The kent festoon the kent.", "logic": "\nDoss(regine, gus)\nFestoon(regine, gus)\nGory(regine)\nHaul(regine, kent)\nHaul(regine, gus)\nUnsuasible(kent)\nHaul(kent, regine)\nDoss(gus, kent)\nFestoon(gus, regine)\nFestoon(gus, kent)\nPitiful(gus)\nPyretic(gus)\nGory(gus)\nDecussate(gus)\nHaul(gus, regine)\nHaul(gus, kent)\nforall x (Haul(x, kent) -> Festoon(x, kent))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> Haul(x, kent))\nforall x (Doss(x, gus) and Haul(x, kent) -> Doss(x, kent))\nPyretic(gus) and Festoon(gus, kent) -> Pitiful(kent)\nDoss(gus, regine) -> Festoon(gus, regine)\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) and Festoon(x, gus) -> Doss(x, kent))\n\nFestoon(kent, kent)\n\nPyretic(gus) and Festoon(gus, kent) and Pyretic(gus) and Festoon(gus, kent) -> Pitiful(kent) -> therefore Pitiful(kent) Pitiful(kent) and forall x (Pitiful(x) -> Haul(x, kent)) -> therefore Haul(kent, kent) Haul(kent, kent) and forall x (Haul(x, kent) -> Festoon(x, kent)) -> therefore Festoon(kent, kent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The aubree skyjack the shawn. The aubree polychrome the shawn. The aubree is scapular. The aubree sweeten the wileen. The aubree sweeten the shawn. The wileen is crushed. The wileen sweeten the aubree. The shawn skyjack the wileen. The shawn polychrome the aubree. The shawn polychrome the wileen. The shawn is locomotor. The shawn is spunky. The shawn is scapular. The shawn is hyperfine. The shawn sweeten the aubree. The shawn sweeten the wileen. If something sweeten the wileen then it polychrome the wileen. If something is locomotor then it sweeten the wileen. If something skyjack the shawn and it sweeten the wileen then it skyjack the wileen. If the shawn is spunky and the shawn polychrome the wileen then the wileen is locomotor. If the shawn skyjack the aubree then the shawn polychrome the aubree. If something is crushed and it polychrome the shawn then it skyjack the wileen. The wileen does not eat the wileen.", "logic": "\nSkyjack(aubree, shawn)\nPolychrome(aubree, shawn)\nScapular(aubree)\nSweeten(aubree, wileen)\nSweeten(aubree, shawn)\nCrushed(wileen)\nSweeten(wileen, aubree)\nSkyjack(shawn, wileen)\nPolychrome(shawn, aubree)\nPolychrome(shawn, wileen)\nLocomotor(shawn)\nSpunky(shawn)\nScapular(shawn)\nHyperfine(shawn)\nSweeten(shawn, aubree)\nSweeten(shawn, wileen)\nforall x (Sweeten(x, wileen) -> Polychrome(x, wileen))\nforall x (Locomotor(x) -> Sweeten(x, wileen))\nforall x (Skyjack(x, shawn) and Sweeten(x, wileen) -> Skyjack(x, wileen))\nSpunky(shawn) and Polychrome(shawn, wileen) -> Locomotor(wileen)\nSkyjack(shawn, aubree) -> Polychrome(shawn, aubree)\nforall x (Crushed(x) and Polychrome(x, shawn) -> Skyjack(x, wileen))\n\nnot Polychrome(wileen, wileen)\n\nSpunky(shawn) and Polychrome(shawn, wileen) and Spunky(shawn) and Polychrome(shawn, wileen) -> Locomotor(wileen) -> therefore Locomotor(wileen) Locomotor(wileen) and forall x (Locomotor(x) -> Sweeten(x, wileen)) -> therefore Sweeten(wileen, wileen) Sweeten(wileen, wileen) and forall x (Sweeten(x, wileen) -> Polychrome(x, wileen)) -> therefore Polychrome(wileen, wileen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The collete seesaw the rand. The collete defecate the rand. The collete is ilxx. The collete forearm the amargo. The collete forearm the rand. The amargo is unmalted. The amargo forearm the collete. The rand seesaw the amargo. The rand defecate the collete. The rand defecate the amargo. The rand is trashy. The rand is systematic. The rand is ilxx. The rand is amygdaline. The rand forearm the collete. The rand forearm the amargo. If something forearm the amargo then it defecate the amargo. If something is trashy then it forearm the amargo. If something seesaw the rand and it forearm the amargo then it seesaw the amargo. If the rand is systematic and the rand defecate the amargo then the amargo is trashy. If the rand seesaw the collete then the rand defecate the collete. If something is unmalted and it defecate the rand then it seesaw the amargo. The amargo does not chase the amargo.", "logic": "\nSeesaw(collete, rand)\nDefecate(collete, rand)\nIlxx(collete)\nForearm(collete, amargo)\nForearm(collete, rand)\nUnmalted(amargo)\nForearm(amargo, collete)\nSeesaw(rand, amargo)\nDefecate(rand, collete)\nDefecate(rand, amargo)\nTrashy(rand)\nSystematic(rand)\nIlxx(rand)\nAmygdaline(rand)\nForearm(rand, collete)\nForearm(rand, amargo)\nforall x (Forearm(x, amargo) -> Defecate(x, amargo))\nforall x (Trashy(x) -> Forearm(x, amargo))\nforall x (Seesaw(x, rand) and Forearm(x, amargo) -> Seesaw(x, amargo))\nSystematic(rand) and Defecate(rand, amargo) -> Trashy(amargo)\nSeesaw(rand, collete) -> Defecate(rand, collete)\nforall x (Unmalted(x) and Defecate(x, rand) -> Seesaw(x, amargo))\n\nnot Seesaw(amargo, amargo)\n\nforall x (Seesaw(x, rand) and Forearm(x, amargo) -> Seesaw(x, amargo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The arabel dehumanize the kellia. The arabel hinge the kellia. The arabel is color. The arabel parent the tallie. The arabel parent the kellia. The tallie is amber. The tallie parent the arabel. The kellia dehumanize the tallie. The kellia hinge the arabel. The kellia hinge the tallie. The kellia is used. The kellia is corneous. The kellia is color. The kellia is cauline. The kellia parent the arabel. The kellia parent the tallie. If something parent the tallie then it hinge the tallie. If something is used then it parent the tallie. If something dehumanize the kellia and it parent the tallie then it dehumanize the tallie. If the kellia is corneous and the kellia hinge the tallie then the tallie is used. If the kellia dehumanize the arabel then the kellia hinge the arabel. If something is amber and it hinge the kellia then it dehumanize the tallie. The arabel is used.", "logic": "\nDehumanize(arabel, kellia)\nHinge(arabel, kellia)\nColor(arabel)\nParent(arabel, tallie)\nParent(arabel, kellia)\nAmber(tallie)\nParent(tallie, arabel)\nDehumanize(kellia, tallie)\nHinge(kellia, arabel)\nHinge(kellia, tallie)\nUsed(kellia)\nCorneous(kellia)\nColor(kellia)\nCauline(kellia)\nParent(kellia, arabel)\nParent(kellia, tallie)\nforall x (Parent(x, tallie) -> Hinge(x, tallie))\nforall x (Used(x) -> Parent(x, tallie))\nforall x (Dehumanize(x, kellia) and Parent(x, tallie) -> Dehumanize(x, tallie))\nCorneous(kellia) and Hinge(kellia, tallie) -> Used(tallie)\nDehumanize(kellia, arabel) -> Hinge(kellia, arabel)\nforall x (Amber(x) and Hinge(x, kellia) -> Dehumanize(x, tallie))\n\nUsed(arabel)\n\nUsed(arabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The dove outlast the tomi. The dove grapple the tomi. The dove is luminous. The dove astonish the elihu. The dove astonish the tomi. The elihu is ethnic. The elihu astonish the dove. The tomi outlast the elihu. The tomi grapple the dove. The tomi grapple the elihu. The tomi is bantu. The tomi is medullary. The tomi is luminous. The tomi is valiant. The tomi astonish the dove. The tomi astonish the elihu. If something astonish the elihu then it grapple the elihu. If something is bantu then it astonish the elihu. If something outlast the tomi and it astonish the elihu then it outlast the elihu. If the tomi is medullary and the tomi grapple the elihu then the elihu is bantu. If the tomi outlast the dove then the tomi grapple the dove. If something is ethnic and it grapple the tomi then it outlast the elihu. The tomi does not chase the dove.", "logic": "\nOutlast(dove, tomi)\nGrapple(dove, tomi)\nLuminous(dove)\nAstonish(dove, elihu)\nAstonish(dove, tomi)\nEthnic(elihu)\nAstonish(elihu, dove)\nOutlast(tomi, elihu)\nGrapple(tomi, dove)\nGrapple(tomi, elihu)\nBantu(tomi)\nMedullary(tomi)\nLuminous(tomi)\nValiant(tomi)\nAstonish(tomi, dove)\nAstonish(tomi, elihu)\nforall x (Astonish(x, elihu) -> Grapple(x, elihu))\nforall x (Bantu(x) -> Astonish(x, elihu))\nforall x (Outlast(x, tomi) and Astonish(x, elihu) -> Outlast(x, elihu))\nMedullary(tomi) and Grapple(tomi, elihu) -> Bantu(elihu)\nOutlast(tomi, dove) -> Grapple(tomi, dove)\nforall x (Ethnic(x) and Grapple(x, tomi) -> Outlast(x, elihu))\n\nnot Outlast(tomi, dove)\n\nnot Outlast(tomi, dove) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The mirabella tucker the candie. The mirabella uncross the candie. The mirabella is assumptive. The mirabella versify the ardine. The mirabella versify the candie. The ardine is mown. The ardine versify the mirabella. The candie tucker the ardine. The candie uncross the mirabella. The candie uncross the ardine. The candie is standing. The candie is dual. The candie is assumptive. The candie is vaccinated. The candie versify the mirabella. The candie versify the ardine. If something versify the ardine then it uncross the ardine. If something is standing then it versify the ardine. If something tucker the candie and it versify the ardine then it tucker the ardine. If the candie is dual and the candie uncross the ardine then the ardine is standing. If the candie tucker the mirabella then the candie uncross the mirabella. If something is mown and it uncross the candie then it tucker the ardine. The candie tucker the candie.", "logic": "\nTucker(mirabella, candie)\nUncross(mirabella, candie)\nAssumptive(mirabella)\nVersify(mirabella, ardine)\nVersify(mirabella, candie)\nMown(ardine)\nVersify(ardine, mirabella)\nTucker(candie, ardine)\nUncross(candie, mirabella)\nUncross(candie, ardine)\nStanding(candie)\nDual(candie)\nAssumptive(candie)\nVaccinated(candie)\nVersify(candie, mirabella)\nVersify(candie, ardine)\nforall x (Versify(x, ardine) -> Uncross(x, ardine))\nforall x (Standing(x) -> Versify(x, ardine))\nforall x (Tucker(x, candie) and Versify(x, ardine) -> Tucker(x, ardine))\nDual(candie) and Uncross(candie, ardine) -> Standing(ardine)\nTucker(candie, mirabella) -> Uncross(candie, mirabella)\nforall x (Mown(x) and Uncross(x, candie) -> Tucker(x, ardine))\n\nTucker(candie, candie)\n\nTucker(candie, candie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The evangelin coincide the robbi. The evangelin transpire the robbi. The evangelin is bleak. The evangelin edge the roze. The evangelin edge the robbi. The roze is tributary. The roze edge the evangelin. The robbi coincide the roze. The robbi transpire the evangelin. The robbi transpire the roze. The robbi is vestiary. The robbi is colicky. The robbi is bleak. The robbi is cerebral. The robbi edge the evangelin. The robbi edge the roze. If something edge the roze then it transpire the roze. If something is vestiary then it edge the roze. If something coincide the robbi and it edge the roze then it coincide the roze. If the robbi is colicky and the robbi transpire the roze then the roze is vestiary. If the robbi coincide the evangelin then the robbi transpire the evangelin. If something is tributary and it transpire the robbi then it coincide the roze. The roze does not like the robbi.", "logic": "\nCoincide(evangelin, robbi)\nTranspire(evangelin, robbi)\nBleak(evangelin)\nEdge(evangelin, roze)\nEdge(evangelin, robbi)\nTributary(roze)\nEdge(roze, evangelin)\nCoincide(robbi, roze)\nTranspire(robbi, evangelin)\nTranspire(robbi, roze)\nVestiary(robbi)\nColicky(robbi)\nBleak(robbi)\nCerebral(robbi)\nEdge(robbi, evangelin)\nEdge(robbi, roze)\nforall x (Edge(x, roze) -> Transpire(x, roze))\nforall x (Vestiary(x) -> Edge(x, roze))\nforall x (Coincide(x, robbi) and Edge(x, roze) -> Coincide(x, roze))\nColicky(robbi) and Transpire(robbi, roze) -> Vestiary(roze)\nCoincide(robbi, evangelin) -> Transpire(robbi, evangelin)\nforall x (Tributary(x) and Transpire(x, robbi) -> Coincide(x, roze))\n\nnot Edge(roze, robbi)\n\nnot Edge(roze, robbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The augustus nickname the calvin. The augustus dent the calvin. The augustus is chordate. The augustus seat the saraann. The augustus seat the calvin. The saraann is demode. The saraann seat the augustus. The calvin nickname the saraann. The calvin dent the augustus. The calvin dent the saraann. The calvin is cogent. The calvin is clashing. The calvin is chordate. The calvin is cancelled. The calvin seat the augustus. The calvin seat the saraann. If something seat the saraann then it dent the saraann. If something is cogent then it seat the saraann. If something nickname the calvin and it seat the saraann then it nickname the saraann. If the calvin is clashing and the calvin dent the saraann then the saraann is cogent. If the calvin nickname the augustus then the calvin dent the augustus. If something is demode and it dent the calvin then it nickname the saraann. The calvin seat the calvin.", "logic": "\nNickname(augustus, calvin)\nDent(augustus, calvin)\nChordate(augustus)\nSeat(augustus, saraann)\nSeat(augustus, calvin)\nDemode(saraann)\nSeat(saraann, augustus)\nNickname(calvin, saraann)\nDent(calvin, augustus)\nDent(calvin, saraann)\nCogent(calvin)\nClashing(calvin)\nChordate(calvin)\nCancelled(calvin)\nSeat(calvin, augustus)\nSeat(calvin, saraann)\nforall x (Seat(x, saraann) -> Dent(x, saraann))\nforall x (Cogent(x) -> Seat(x, saraann))\nforall x (Nickname(x, calvin) and Seat(x, saraann) -> Nickname(x, saraann))\nClashing(calvin) and Dent(calvin, saraann) -> Cogent(saraann)\nNickname(calvin, augustus) -> Dent(calvin, augustus)\nforall x (Demode(x) and Dent(x, calvin) -> Nickname(x, saraann))\n\nSeat(calvin, calvin)\n\nSeat(calvin, calvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The hudson rain the lydie. The hudson overwinter the lydie. The hudson is tamed. The hudson exhale the ellsworth. The hudson exhale the lydie. The ellsworth is flyspeck. The ellsworth exhale the hudson. The lydie rain the ellsworth. The lydie overwinter the hudson. The lydie overwinter the ellsworth. The lydie is endovenous. The lydie is appeasing. The lydie is tamed. The lydie is underfed. The lydie exhale the hudson. The lydie exhale the ellsworth. If something exhale the ellsworth then it overwinter the ellsworth. If something is endovenous then it exhale the ellsworth. If something rain the lydie and it exhale the ellsworth then it rain the ellsworth. If the lydie is appeasing and the lydie overwinter the ellsworth then the ellsworth is endovenous. If the lydie rain the hudson then the lydie overwinter the hudson. If something is flyspeck and it overwinter the lydie then it rain the ellsworth. The hudson is not appeasing.", "logic": "\nRain(hudson, lydie)\nOverwinter(hudson, lydie)\nTamed(hudson)\nExhale(hudson, ellsworth)\nExhale(hudson, lydie)\nFlyspeck(ellsworth)\nExhale(ellsworth, hudson)\nRain(lydie, ellsworth)\nOverwinter(lydie, hudson)\nOverwinter(lydie, ellsworth)\nEndovenous(lydie)\nAppeasing(lydie)\nTamed(lydie)\nUnderfed(lydie)\nExhale(lydie, hudson)\nExhale(lydie, ellsworth)\nforall x (Exhale(x, ellsworth) -> Overwinter(x, ellsworth))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) -> Exhale(x, ellsworth))\nforall x (Rain(x, lydie) and Exhale(x, ellsworth) -> Rain(x, ellsworth))\nAppeasing(lydie) and Overwinter(lydie, ellsworth) -> Endovenous(ellsworth)\nRain(lydie, hudson) -> Overwinter(lydie, hudson)\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) and Overwinter(x, lydie) -> Rain(x, ellsworth))\n\nnot Appeasing(hudson)\n\nnot Appeasing(hudson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The amy admix the elora. The amy militate the elora. The amy is glaucous. The amy splint the clo. The amy splint the elora. The clo is defoliated. The clo splint the amy. The elora admix the clo. The elora militate the amy. The elora militate the clo. The elora is gowned. The elora is barred. The elora is glaucous. The elora is permutable. The elora splint the amy. The elora splint the clo. If something splint the clo then it militate the clo. If something is gowned then it splint the clo. If something admix the elora and it splint the clo then it admix the clo. If the elora is barred and the elora militate the clo then the clo is gowned. If the elora admix the amy then the elora militate the amy. If something is defoliated and it militate the elora then it admix the clo. The clo is barred.", "logic": "\nAdmix(amy, elora)\nMilitate(amy, elora)\nGlaucous(amy)\nSplint(amy, clo)\nSplint(amy, elora)\nDefoliated(clo)\nSplint(clo, amy)\nAdmix(elora, clo)\nMilitate(elora, amy)\nMilitate(elora, clo)\nGowned(elora)\nBarred(elora)\nGlaucous(elora)\nPermutable(elora)\nSplint(elora, amy)\nSplint(elora, clo)\nforall x (Splint(x, clo) -> Militate(x, clo))\nforall x (Gowned(x) -> Splint(x, clo))\nforall x (Admix(x, elora) and Splint(x, clo) -> Admix(x, clo))\nBarred(elora) and Militate(elora, clo) -> Gowned(clo)\nAdmix(elora, amy) -> Militate(elora, amy)\nforall x (Defoliated(x) and Militate(x, elora) -> Admix(x, clo))\n\nBarred(clo)\n\nBarred(clo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The emmye enfilade the glad. The glad hawk the emmye. If the glad is burning and the glad enfilade the emmye then the emmye is burning. If someone is burning and they eat the glad then they are sandalled. If someone hawk the emmye then the emmye hawk the glad. If the glad enfilade the emmye and the glad is subdued then the emmye is fungoid. If someone enfilade the glad and they see the glad then the glad is burning. If someone enfilade the glad then the glad enfilade the emmye. If someone hawk the emmye and the emmye does not like the glad then the emmye is subdued. If someone is subdued and they do not eat the emmye then they like the emmye. The glad hawk the emmye.", "logic": "\nEnfilade(emmye, glad)\nHawk(glad, emmye)\nBurning(glad) and Enfilade(glad, emmye) -> Burning(emmye)\nforall x (Burning(x) and Enfilade(x, glad) -> Sandalled(x))\nforall x (Hawk(x, emmye) -> Hawk(emmye, glad))\nEnfilade(glad, emmye) and Subdued(glad) -> Fungoid(emmye)\nforall x (Enfilade(x, glad) and Hawk(x, glad) -> Burning(glad))\nforall x (Enfilade(x, glad) -> Enfilade(glad, emmye))\nforall x (Hawk(x, emmye) and not Focalise(emmye, glad) -> Subdued(emmye))\nforall x (Subdued(x) and not Enfilade(x, emmye) -> Focalise(x, emmye))\n\nHawk(glad, emmye)\n\ntherefore Hawk(glad, emmye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The alana butcher the friedrich. The friedrich augment the alana. If the friedrich is ramate and the friedrich butcher the alana then the alana is ramate. If someone is ramate and they eat the friedrich then they are hypnoid. If someone augment the alana then the alana augment the friedrich. If the friedrich butcher the alana and the friedrich is unforeseen then the alana is unaired. If someone butcher the friedrich and they see the friedrich then the friedrich is ramate. If someone butcher the friedrich then the friedrich butcher the alana. If someone augment the alana and the alana does not like the friedrich then the alana is unforeseen. If someone is unforeseen and they do not eat the alana then they like the alana. The friedrich does not see the alana.", "logic": "\nButcher(alana, friedrich)\nAugment(friedrich, alana)\nRamate(friedrich) and Butcher(friedrich, alana) -> Ramate(alana)\nforall x (Ramate(x) and Butcher(x, friedrich) -> Hypnoid(x))\nforall x (Augment(x, alana) -> Augment(alana, friedrich))\nButcher(friedrich, alana) and Unforeseen(friedrich) -> Unaired(alana)\nforall x (Butcher(x, friedrich) and Augment(x, friedrich) -> Ramate(friedrich))\nforall x (Butcher(x, friedrich) -> Butcher(friedrich, alana))\nforall x (Augment(x, alana) and not Taboo(alana, friedrich) -> Unforeseen(alana))\nforall x (Unforeseen(x) and not Butcher(x, alana) -> Taboo(x, alana))\n\nnot Augment(friedrich, alana)\n\ntherefore Augment(friedrich, alana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The brodie anticipate the debra. The debra yearn the brodie. If the debra is cotyloidal and the debra anticipate the brodie then the brodie is cotyloidal. If someone is cotyloidal and they eat the debra then they are unparallel. If someone yearn the brodie then the brodie yearn the debra. If the debra anticipate the brodie and the debra is mozartean then the brodie is measurable. If someone anticipate the debra and they see the debra then the debra is cotyloidal. If someone anticipate the debra then the debra anticipate the brodie. If someone yearn the brodie and the brodie does not like the debra then the brodie is mozartean. If someone is mozartean and they do not eat the brodie then they like the brodie. The brodie yearn the debra.", "logic": "\nAnticipate(brodie, debra)\nYearn(debra, brodie)\nCotyloidal(debra) and Anticipate(debra, brodie) -> Cotyloidal(brodie)\nforall x (Cotyloidal(x) and Anticipate(x, debra) -> Unparallel(x))\nforall x (Yearn(x, brodie) -> Yearn(brodie, debra))\nAnticipate(debra, brodie) and Mozartean(debra) -> Measurable(brodie)\nforall x (Anticipate(x, debra) and Yearn(x, debra) -> Cotyloidal(debra))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, debra) -> Anticipate(debra, brodie))\nforall x (Yearn(x, brodie) and not Notate(brodie, debra) -> Mozartean(brodie))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) and not Anticipate(x, brodie) -> Notate(x, brodie))\n\nYearn(brodie, debra)\n\nYearn(debra, brodie) and forall x (Yearn(x, brodie) -> Yearn(brodie, debra)) -> therefore Yearn(brodie, debra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The tremain bedaub the jordanna. The jordanna isomerize the tremain. If the jordanna is gluteal and the jordanna bedaub the tremain then the tremain is gluteal. If someone is gluteal and they eat the jordanna then they are unhallowed. If someone isomerize the tremain then the tremain isomerize the jordanna. If the jordanna bedaub the tremain and the jordanna is polyphonic then the tremain is prima. If someone bedaub the jordanna and they see the jordanna then the jordanna is gluteal. If someone bedaub the jordanna then the jordanna bedaub the tremain. If someone isomerize the tremain and the tremain does not like the jordanna then the tremain is polyphonic. If someone is polyphonic and they do not eat the tremain then they like the tremain. The tremain does not see the jordanna.", "logic": "\nBedaub(tremain, jordanna)\nIsomerize(jordanna, tremain)\nGluteal(jordanna) and Bedaub(jordanna, tremain) -> Gluteal(tremain)\nforall x (Gluteal(x) and Bedaub(x, jordanna) -> Unhallowed(x))\nforall x (Isomerize(x, tremain) -> Isomerize(tremain, jordanna))\nBedaub(jordanna, tremain) and Polyphonic(jordanna) -> Prima(tremain)\nforall x (Bedaub(x, jordanna) and Isomerize(x, jordanna) -> Gluteal(jordanna))\nforall x (Bedaub(x, jordanna) -> Bedaub(jordanna, tremain))\nforall x (Isomerize(x, tremain) and not Deem(tremain, jordanna) -> Polyphonic(tremain))\nforall x (Polyphonic(x) and not Bedaub(x, tremain) -> Deem(x, tremain))\n\nnot Isomerize(tremain, jordanna)\n\nIsomerize(jordanna, tremain) and forall x (Isomerize(x, tremain) -> Isomerize(tremain, jordanna)) -> therefore Isomerize(tremain, jordanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The erina overtrump the frannie. The frannie heel the erina. If the frannie is currish and the frannie overtrump the erina then the erina is currish. If someone is currish and they eat the frannie then they are campy. If someone heel the erina then the erina heel the frannie. If the frannie overtrump the erina and the frannie is dreamy then the erina is plantal. If someone overtrump the frannie and they see the frannie then the frannie is currish. If someone overtrump the frannie then the frannie overtrump the erina. If someone heel the erina and the erina does not like the frannie then the erina is dreamy. If someone is dreamy and they do not eat the erina then they like the erina. The frannie is currish.", "logic": "\nOvertrump(erina, frannie)\nHeel(frannie, erina)\nCurrish(frannie) and Overtrump(frannie, erina) -> Currish(erina)\nforall x (Currish(x) and Overtrump(x, frannie) -> Campy(x))\nforall x (Heel(x, erina) -> Heel(erina, frannie))\nOvertrump(frannie, erina) and Dreamy(frannie) -> Plantal(erina)\nforall x (Overtrump(x, frannie) and Heel(x, frannie) -> Currish(frannie))\nforall x (Overtrump(x, frannie) -> Overtrump(frannie, erina))\nforall x (Heel(x, erina) and not Draggle(erina, frannie) -> Dreamy(erina))\nforall x (Dreamy(x) and not Overtrump(x, erina) -> Draggle(x, erina))\n\nCurrish(frannie)\n\nHeel(frannie, erina) and forall x (Heel(x, erina) -> Heel(erina, frannie)) -> therefore Heel(erina, frannie) Overtrump(erina, frannie) and Heel(erina, frannie) and forall x (Overtrump(x, frannie) and Heel(x, frannie) -> Currish(frannie)) -> therefore Currish(frannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The angele skyjack the kerrill. The kerrill appertain the angele. If the kerrill is congestive and the kerrill skyjack the angele then the angele is congestive. If someone is congestive and they eat the kerrill then they are halfway. If someone appertain the angele then the angele appertain the kerrill. If the kerrill skyjack the angele and the kerrill is multiplex then the angele is restive. If someone skyjack the kerrill and they see the kerrill then the kerrill is congestive. If someone skyjack the kerrill then the kerrill skyjack the angele. If someone appertain the angele and the angele does not like the kerrill then the angele is multiplex. If someone is multiplex and they do not eat the angele then they like the angele. The kerrill is not congestive.", "logic": "\nSkyjack(angele, kerrill)\nAppertain(kerrill, angele)\nCongestive(kerrill) and Skyjack(kerrill, angele) -> Congestive(angele)\nforall x (Congestive(x) and Skyjack(x, kerrill) -> Halfway(x))\nforall x (Appertain(x, angele) -> Appertain(angele, kerrill))\nSkyjack(kerrill, angele) and Multiplex(kerrill) -> Restive(angele)\nforall x (Skyjack(x, kerrill) and Appertain(x, kerrill) -> Congestive(kerrill))\nforall x (Skyjack(x, kerrill) -> Skyjack(kerrill, angele))\nforall x (Appertain(x, angele) and not Kayak(angele, kerrill) -> Multiplex(angele))\nforall x (Multiplex(x) and not Skyjack(x, angele) -> Kayak(x, angele))\n\nnot Congestive(kerrill)\n\nAppertain(kerrill, angele) and forall x (Appertain(x, angele) -> Appertain(angele, kerrill)) -> therefore Appertain(angele, kerrill) Skyjack(angele, kerrill) and Appertain(angele, kerrill) and forall x (Skyjack(x, kerrill) and Appertain(x, kerrill) -> Congestive(kerrill)) -> therefore Congestive(kerrill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The ealasaid disrobe the dottie. The dottie barber the ealasaid. If the dottie is shaped and the dottie disrobe the ealasaid then the ealasaid is shaped. If someone is shaped and they eat the dottie then they are storied. If someone barber the ealasaid then the ealasaid barber the dottie. If the dottie disrobe the ealasaid and the dottie is azygos then the ealasaid is pernicious. If someone disrobe the dottie and they see the dottie then the dottie is shaped. If someone disrobe the dottie then the dottie disrobe the ealasaid. If someone barber the ealasaid and the ealasaid does not like the dottie then the ealasaid is azygos. If someone is azygos and they do not eat the ealasaid then they like the ealasaid. The ealasaid is shaped.", "logic": "\nDisrobe(ealasaid, dottie)\nBarber(dottie, ealasaid)\nShaped(dottie) and Disrobe(dottie, ealasaid) -> Shaped(ealasaid)\nforall x (Shaped(x) and Disrobe(x, dottie) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Barber(x, ealasaid) -> Barber(ealasaid, dottie))\nDisrobe(dottie, ealasaid) and Azygos(dottie) -> Pernicious(ealasaid)\nforall x (Disrobe(x, dottie) and Barber(x, dottie) -> Shaped(dottie))\nforall x (Disrobe(x, dottie) -> Disrobe(dottie, ealasaid))\nforall x (Barber(x, ealasaid) and not Speckle(ealasaid, dottie) -> Azygos(ealasaid))\nforall x (Azygos(x) and not Disrobe(x, ealasaid) -> Speckle(x, ealasaid))\n\nShaped(ealasaid)\n\nBarber(dottie, ealasaid) and forall x (Barber(x, ealasaid) -> Barber(ealasaid, dottie)) -> therefore Barber(ealasaid, dottie) Disrobe(ealasaid, dottie) and Barber(ealasaid, dottie) and forall x (Disrobe(x, dottie) and Barber(x, dottie) -> Shaped(dottie)) -> therefore Shaped(dottie) Disrobe(ealasaid, dottie) and forall x (Disrobe(x, dottie) -> Disrobe(dottie, ealasaid)) -> therefore Disrobe(dottie, ealasaid) Shaped(dottie) and Disrobe(dottie, ealasaid) and Shaped(dottie) and Disrobe(dottie, ealasaid) -> Shaped(ealasaid) -> therefore Shaped(ealasaid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The ambrosi delimit the randolph. The randolph stet the ambrosi. If the randolph is roguish and the randolph delimit the ambrosi then the ambrosi is roguish. If someone is roguish and they eat the randolph then they are cxxv. If someone stet the ambrosi then the ambrosi stet the randolph. If the randolph delimit the ambrosi and the randolph is delimited then the ambrosi is hardbacked. If someone delimit the randolph and they see the randolph then the randolph is roguish. If someone delimit the randolph then the randolph delimit the ambrosi. If someone stet the ambrosi and the ambrosi does not like the randolph then the ambrosi is delimited. If someone is delimited and they do not eat the ambrosi then they like the ambrosi. The ambrosi is not roguish.", "logic": "\nDelimit(ambrosi, randolph)\nStet(randolph, ambrosi)\nRoguish(randolph) and Delimit(randolph, ambrosi) -> Roguish(ambrosi)\nforall x (Roguish(x) and Delimit(x, randolph) -> Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Stet(x, ambrosi) -> Stet(ambrosi, randolph))\nDelimit(randolph, ambrosi) and Delimited(randolph) -> Hardbacked(ambrosi)\nforall x (Delimit(x, randolph) and Stet(x, randolph) -> Roguish(randolph))\nforall x (Delimit(x, randolph) -> Delimit(randolph, ambrosi))\nforall x (Stet(x, ambrosi) and not Permute(ambrosi, randolph) -> Delimited(ambrosi))\nforall x (Delimited(x) and not Delimit(x, ambrosi) -> Permute(x, ambrosi))\n\nnot Roguish(ambrosi)\n\nStet(randolph, ambrosi) and forall x (Stet(x, ambrosi) -> Stet(ambrosi, randolph)) -> therefore Stet(ambrosi, randolph) Delimit(ambrosi, randolph) and Stet(ambrosi, randolph) and forall x (Delimit(x, randolph) and Stet(x, randolph) -> Roguish(randolph)) -> therefore Roguish(randolph) Delimit(ambrosi, randolph) and forall x (Delimit(x, randolph) -> Delimit(randolph, ambrosi)) -> therefore Delimit(randolph, ambrosi) Roguish(randolph) and Delimit(randolph, ambrosi) and Roguish(randolph) and Delimit(randolph, ambrosi) -> Roguish(ambrosi) -> therefore Roguish(ambrosi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The hiralal dissociate the rozina. The rozina fluster the hiralal. If the rozina is stearic and the rozina dissociate the hiralal then the hiralal is stearic. If someone is stearic and they eat the rozina then they are rwandan. If someone fluster the hiralal then the hiralal fluster the rozina. If the rozina dissociate the hiralal and the rozina is thankful then the hiralal is wheelless. If someone dissociate the rozina and they see the rozina then the rozina is stearic. If someone dissociate the rozina then the rozina dissociate the hiralal. If someone fluster the hiralal and the hiralal does not like the rozina then the hiralal is thankful. If someone is thankful and they do not eat the hiralal then they like the hiralal. The hiralal is not wheelless.", "logic": "\nDissociate(hiralal, rozina)\nFluster(rozina, hiralal)\nStearic(rozina) and Dissociate(rozina, hiralal) -> Stearic(hiralal)\nforall x (Stearic(x) and Dissociate(x, rozina) -> Rwandan(x))\nforall x (Fluster(x, hiralal) -> Fluster(hiralal, rozina))\nDissociate(rozina, hiralal) and Thankful(rozina) -> Wheelless(hiralal)\nforall x (Dissociate(x, rozina) and Fluster(x, rozina) -> Stearic(rozina))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, rozina) -> Dissociate(rozina, hiralal))\nforall x (Fluster(x, hiralal) and not Enjoin(hiralal, rozina) -> Thankful(hiralal))\nforall x (Thankful(x) and not Dissociate(x, hiralal) -> Enjoin(x, hiralal))\n\nnot Wheelless(hiralal)\n\nDissociate(rozina, hiralal) and Thankful(rozina) -> Wheelless(hiralal) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The veriee capsize the stillman. The stillman calligraph the veriee. If the stillman is cervical and the stillman capsize the veriee then the veriee is cervical. If someone is cervical and they eat the stillman then they are realized. If someone calligraph the veriee then the veriee calligraph the stillman. If the stillman capsize the veriee and the stillman is seagirt then the veriee is patriotic. If someone capsize the stillman and they see the stillman then the stillman is cervical. If someone capsize the stillman then the stillman capsize the veriee. If someone calligraph the veriee and the veriee does not like the stillman then the veriee is seagirt. If someone is seagirt and they do not eat the veriee then they like the veriee. The stillman metricate the veriee.", "logic": "\nCapsize(veriee, stillman)\nCalligraph(stillman, veriee)\nCervical(stillman) and Capsize(stillman, veriee) -> Cervical(veriee)\nforall x (Cervical(x) and Capsize(x, stillman) -> Realized(x))\nforall x (Calligraph(x, veriee) -> Calligraph(veriee, stillman))\nCapsize(stillman, veriee) and Seagirt(stillman) -> Patriotic(veriee)\nforall x (Capsize(x, stillman) and Calligraph(x, stillman) -> Cervical(stillman))\nforall x (Capsize(x, stillman) -> Capsize(stillman, veriee))\nforall x (Calligraph(x, veriee) and not Metricate(veriee, stillman) -> Seagirt(veriee))\nforall x (Seagirt(x) and not Capsize(x, veriee) -> Metricate(x, veriee))\n\nMetricate(stillman, veriee)\n\nforall x (Seagirt(x) and not Capsize(x, veriee) -> Metricate(x, veriee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The uli purse the pauletta. The pauletta graph the uli. If the pauletta is debile and the pauletta purse the uli then the uli is debile. If someone is debile and they eat the pauletta then they are singable. If someone graph the uli then the uli graph the pauletta. If the pauletta purse the uli and the pauletta is formidable then the uli is witless. If someone purse the pauletta and they see the pauletta then the pauletta is debile. If someone purse the pauletta then the pauletta purse the uli. If someone graph the uli and the uli does not like the pauletta then the uli is formidable. If someone is formidable and they do not eat the uli then they like the uli. The pauletta is not singable.", "logic": "\nPurse(uli, pauletta)\nGraph(pauletta, uli)\nDebile(pauletta) and Purse(pauletta, uli) -> Debile(uli)\nforall x (Debile(x) and Purse(x, pauletta) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Graph(x, uli) -> Graph(uli, pauletta))\nPurse(pauletta, uli) and Formidable(pauletta) -> Witless(uli)\nforall x (Purse(x, pauletta) and Graph(x, pauletta) -> Debile(pauletta))\nforall x (Purse(x, pauletta) -> Purse(pauletta, uli))\nforall x (Graph(x, uli) and not Postulate(uli, pauletta) -> Formidable(uli))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and not Purse(x, uli) -> Postulate(x, uli))\n\nnot Singable(pauletta)\n\nforall x (Debile(x) and Purse(x, pauletta) -> Singable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The camilla cave the lila. The lila make the camilla. If the lila is mozartean and the lila cave the camilla then the camilla is mozartean. If someone is mozartean and they eat the lila then they are bowery. If someone make the camilla then the camilla make the lila. If the lila cave the camilla and the lila is rousing then the camilla is hardfisted. If someone cave the lila and they see the lila then the lila is mozartean. If someone cave the lila then the lila cave the camilla. If someone make the camilla and the camilla does not like the lila then the camilla is rousing. If someone is rousing and they do not eat the camilla then they like the camilla. The camilla chevy the camilla.", "logic": "\nCave(camilla, lila)\nMake(lila, camilla)\nMozartean(lila) and Cave(lila, camilla) -> Mozartean(camilla)\nforall x (Mozartean(x) and Cave(x, lila) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Make(x, camilla) -> Make(camilla, lila))\nCave(lila, camilla) and Rousing(lila) -> Hardfisted(camilla)\nforall x (Cave(x, lila) and Make(x, lila) -> Mozartean(lila))\nforall x (Cave(x, lila) -> Cave(lila, camilla))\nforall x (Make(x, camilla) and not Chevy(camilla, lila) -> Rousing(camilla))\nforall x (Rousing(x) and not Cave(x, camilla) -> Chevy(x, camilla))\n\nChevy(camilla, camilla)\n\nforall x (Rousing(x) and not Cave(x, camilla) -> Chevy(x, camilla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The ronalda regress the marnie. The marnie canvas the ronalda. If the marnie is secretive and the marnie regress the ronalda then the ronalda is secretive. If someone is secretive and they eat the marnie then they are befogged. If someone canvas the ronalda then the ronalda canvas the marnie. If the marnie regress the ronalda and the marnie is hagridden then the ronalda is porcine. If someone regress the marnie and they see the marnie then the marnie is secretive. If someone regress the marnie then the marnie regress the ronalda. If someone canvas the ronalda and the ronalda does not like the marnie then the ronalda is hagridden. If someone is hagridden and they do not eat the ronalda then they like the ronalda. The marnie does not see the marnie.", "logic": "\nRegress(ronalda, marnie)\nCanvas(marnie, ronalda)\nSecretive(marnie) and Regress(marnie, ronalda) -> Secretive(ronalda)\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Regress(x, marnie) -> Befogged(x))\nforall x (Canvas(x, ronalda) -> Canvas(ronalda, marnie))\nRegress(marnie, ronalda) and Hagridden(marnie) -> Porcine(ronalda)\nforall x (Regress(x, marnie) and Canvas(x, marnie) -> Secretive(marnie))\nforall x (Regress(x, marnie) -> Regress(marnie, ronalda))\nforall x (Canvas(x, ronalda) and not Toady(ronalda, marnie) -> Hagridden(ronalda))\nforall x (Hagridden(x) and not Regress(x, ronalda) -> Toady(x, ronalda))\n\nnot Canvas(marnie, marnie)\n\nnot Canvas(marnie, marnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The corri unsex the adlai. The adlai intertwine the corri. If the adlai is monodical and the adlai unsex the corri then the corri is monodical. If someone is monodical and they eat the adlai then they are bendable. If someone intertwine the corri then the corri intertwine the adlai. If the adlai unsex the corri and the adlai is benign then the corri is torturous. If someone unsex the adlai and they see the adlai then the adlai is monodical. If someone unsex the adlai then the adlai unsex the corri. If someone intertwine the corri and the corri does not like the adlai then the corri is benign. If someone is benign and they do not eat the corri then they like the corri. The adlai is torturous.", "logic": "\nUnsex(corri, adlai)\nIntertwine(adlai, corri)\nMonodical(adlai) and Unsex(adlai, corri) -> Monodical(corri)\nforall x (Monodical(x) and Unsex(x, adlai) -> Bendable(x))\nforall x (Intertwine(x, corri) -> Intertwine(corri, adlai))\nUnsex(adlai, corri) and Benign(adlai) -> Torturous(corri)\nforall x (Unsex(x, adlai) and Intertwine(x, adlai) -> Monodical(adlai))\nforall x (Unsex(x, adlai) -> Unsex(adlai, corri))\nforall x (Intertwine(x, corri) and not Depreciate(corri, adlai) -> Benign(corri))\nforall x (Benign(x) and not Unsex(x, corri) -> Depreciate(x, corri))\n\nTorturous(adlai)\n\nTorturous(adlai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The fancy dulcify the netty. The netty conduct the fancy. If the netty is cuboidal and the netty dulcify the fancy then the fancy is cuboidal. If someone is cuboidal and they eat the netty then they are woolly. If someone conduct the fancy then the fancy conduct the netty. If the netty dulcify the fancy and the netty is chantlike then the fancy is soluble. If someone dulcify the netty and they see the netty then the netty is cuboidal. If someone dulcify the netty then the netty dulcify the fancy. If someone conduct the fancy and the fancy does not like the netty then the fancy is chantlike. If someone is chantlike and they do not eat the fancy then they like the fancy. The fancy does not see the fancy.", "logic": "\nDulcify(fancy, netty)\nConduct(netty, fancy)\nCuboidal(netty) and Dulcify(netty, fancy) -> Cuboidal(fancy)\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) and Dulcify(x, netty) -> Woolly(x))\nforall x (Conduct(x, fancy) -> Conduct(fancy, netty))\nDulcify(netty, fancy) and Chantlike(netty) -> Soluble(fancy)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, netty) and Conduct(x, netty) -> Cuboidal(netty))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, netty) -> Dulcify(netty, fancy))\nforall x (Conduct(x, fancy) and not Clew(fancy, netty) -> Chantlike(fancy))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) and not Dulcify(x, fancy) -> Clew(x, fancy))\n\nnot Conduct(fancy, fancy)\n\nnot Conduct(fancy, fancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The deni goof the adiana. The adiana lubricate the deni. If the adiana is nurturant and the adiana goof the deni then the deni is nurturant. If someone is nurturant and they eat the adiana then they are orthodox. If someone lubricate the deni then the deni lubricate the adiana. If the adiana goof the deni and the adiana is insensate then the deni is unwomanly. If someone goof the adiana and they see the adiana then the adiana is nurturant. If someone goof the adiana then the adiana goof the deni. If someone lubricate the deni and the deni does not like the adiana then the deni is insensate. If someone is insensate and they do not eat the deni then they like the deni. The deni goof the deni.", "logic": "\nGoof(deni, adiana)\nLubricate(adiana, deni)\nNurturant(adiana) and Goof(adiana, deni) -> Nurturant(deni)\nforall x (Nurturant(x) and Goof(x, adiana) -> Orthodox(x))\nforall x (Lubricate(x, deni) -> Lubricate(deni, adiana))\nGoof(adiana, deni) and Insensate(adiana) -> Unwomanly(deni)\nforall x (Goof(x, adiana) and Lubricate(x, adiana) -> Nurturant(adiana))\nforall x (Goof(x, adiana) -> Goof(adiana, deni))\nforall x (Lubricate(x, deni) and not Accuse(deni, adiana) -> Insensate(deni))\nforall x (Insensate(x) and not Goof(x, deni) -> Accuse(x, deni))\n\nGoof(deni, deni)\n\nGoof(deni, deni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "Reuben is hematal. Gino is not roumanian. Sallyanne is hematal. If Gino is not prototypic then Gino is trig. All roumanian things are not trig. If something is copious then it is roumanian. If Reuben is not prototypic then Reuben is roumanian. All hematal things are copious. If something is hematal and not trig then it is unstrung. Reuben is hematal.", "logic": "\nHematal(reuben)\nnot Roumanian(gino)\nHematal(sallyanne)\nnot Prototypic(gino) -> Trig(gino)\nforall x (Roumanian(x) -> not Trig(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Roumanian(x))\nnot Prototypic(reuben) -> Roumanian(reuben)\nforall x (Hematal(x) -> Copious(x))\nforall x (Hematal(x) and not Trig(x) -> Unstrung(x))\n\nHematal(reuben)\n\ntherefore Hematal(reuben)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Jasper is carpal. Sherye is not arthritic. Torrin is carpal. If Sherye is not passerine then Sherye is protestant. All arthritic things are not protestant. If something is soulless then it is arthritic. If Jasper is not passerine then Jasper is arthritic. All carpal things are soulless. If something is carpal and not protestant then it is interfaith. Jasper is not carpal.", "logic": "\nCarpal(jasper)\nnot Arthritic(sherye)\nCarpal(torrin)\nnot Passerine(sherye) -> Protestant(sherye)\nforall x (Arthritic(x) -> not Protestant(x))\nforall x (Soulless(x) -> Arthritic(x))\nnot Passerine(jasper) -> Arthritic(jasper)\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Soulless(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) and not Protestant(x) -> Interfaith(x))\n\nnot Carpal(jasper)\n\ntherefore Carpal(jasper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Madella is teutonic. Evvie is not statuesque. Cora is teutonic. If Evvie is not nonporous then Evvie is gelid. All statuesque things are not gelid. If something is lactic then it is statuesque. If Madella is not nonporous then Madella is statuesque. All teutonic things are lactic. If something is teutonic and not gelid then it is astute. Cora is lactic.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(madella)\nnot Statuesque(evvie)\nTeutonic(cora)\nnot Nonporous(evvie) -> Gelid(evvie)\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> not Gelid(x))\nforall x (Lactic(x) -> Statuesque(x))\nnot Nonporous(madella) -> Statuesque(madella)\nforall x (Teutonic(x) -> Lactic(x))\nforall x (Teutonic(x) and not Gelid(x) -> Astute(x))\n\nLactic(cora)\n\nTeutonic(cora) and forall x (Teutonic(x) -> Lactic(x)) -> therefore Lactic(cora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Willdon is indocile. Ravi is not jurassic. Sharity is indocile. If Ravi is not blustery then Ravi is unwearying. All jurassic things are not unwearying. If something is blurred then it is jurassic. If Willdon is not blustery then Willdon is jurassic. All indocile things are blurred. If something is indocile and not unwearying then it is diminutive. Willdon is not blurred.", "logic": "\nIndocile(willdon)\nnot Jurassic(ravi)\nIndocile(sharity)\nnot Blustery(ravi) -> Unwearying(ravi)\nforall x (Jurassic(x) -> not Unwearying(x))\nforall x (Blurred(x) -> Jurassic(x))\nnot Blustery(willdon) -> Jurassic(willdon)\nforall x (Indocile(x) -> Blurred(x))\nforall x (Indocile(x) and not Unwearying(x) -> Diminutive(x))\n\nnot Blurred(willdon)\n\nIndocile(willdon) and forall x (Indocile(x) -> Blurred(x)) -> therefore Blurred(willdon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Dianna is unmerciful. Roderic is not milled. Henderson is unmerciful. If Roderic is not fleshy then Roderic is immaculate. All milled things are not immaculate. If something is wispy then it is milled. If Dianna is not fleshy then Dianna is milled. All unmerciful things are wispy. If something is unmerciful and not immaculate then it is thready. Dianna is milled.", "logic": "\nUnmerciful(dianna)\nnot Milled(roderic)\nUnmerciful(henderson)\nnot Fleshy(roderic) -> Immaculate(roderic)\nforall x (Milled(x) -> not Immaculate(x))\nforall x (Wispy(x) -> Milled(x))\nnot Fleshy(dianna) -> Milled(dianna)\nforall x (Unmerciful(x) -> Wispy(x))\nforall x (Unmerciful(x) and not Immaculate(x) -> Thready(x))\n\nMilled(dianna)\n\nUnmerciful(dianna) and forall x (Unmerciful(x) -> Wispy(x)) -> therefore Wispy(dianna) Wispy(dianna) and forall x (Wispy(x) -> Milled(x)) -> therefore Milled(dianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Jayne is living. Celestina is not catatonic. Kelley is living. If Celestina is not expiatory then Celestina is acned. All catatonic things are not acned. If something is crocketed then it is catatonic. If Jayne is not expiatory then Jayne is catatonic. All living things are crocketed. If something is living and not acned then it is filmed. Kelley is not catatonic.", "logic": "\nLiving(jayne)\nnot Catatonic(celestina)\nLiving(kelley)\nnot Expiatory(celestina) -> Acned(celestina)\nforall x (Catatonic(x) -> not Acned(x))\nforall x (Crocketed(x) -> Catatonic(x))\nnot Expiatory(jayne) -> Catatonic(jayne)\nforall x (Living(x) -> Crocketed(x))\nforall x (Living(x) and not Acned(x) -> Filmed(x))\n\nnot Catatonic(kelley)\n\nLiving(kelley) and forall x (Living(x) -> Crocketed(x)) -> therefore Crocketed(kelley) Crocketed(kelley) and forall x (Crocketed(x) -> Catatonic(x)) -> therefore Catatonic(kelley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Jen is witching. Eveleen is not nomadic. Benedicta is witching. If Eveleen is not covariant then Eveleen is vulpecular. All nomadic things are not vulpecular. If something is skeletal then it is nomadic. If Jen is not covariant then Jen is nomadic. All witching things are skeletal. If something is witching and not vulpecular then it is gingival. Jen is not vulpecular.", "logic": "\nWitching(jen)\nnot Nomadic(eveleen)\nWitching(benedicta)\nnot Covariant(eveleen) -> Vulpecular(eveleen)\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> not Vulpecular(x))\nforall x (Skeletal(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nnot Covariant(jen) -> Nomadic(jen)\nforall x (Witching(x) -> Skeletal(x))\nforall x (Witching(x) and not Vulpecular(x) -> Gingival(x))\n\nnot Vulpecular(jen)\n\nWitching(jen) and forall x (Witching(x) -> Skeletal(x)) -> therefore Skeletal(jen) Skeletal(jen) and forall x (Skeletal(x) -> Nomadic(x)) -> therefore Nomadic(jen) Nomadic(jen) and forall x (Nomadic(x) -> not Vulpecular(x)) -> therefore not Vulpecular(jen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Valera is touchable. Nina is not uncombined. Tiphany is touchable. If Nina is not slumberous then Nina is miasmal. All uncombined things are not miasmal. If something is apical then it is uncombined. If Valera is not slumberous then Valera is uncombined. All touchable things are apical. If something is touchable and not miasmal then it is spiderlike. Valera is miasmal.", "logic": "\nTouchable(valera)\nnot Uncombined(nina)\nTouchable(tiphany)\nnot Slumberous(nina) -> Miasmal(nina)\nforall x (Uncombined(x) -> not Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Apical(x) -> Uncombined(x))\nnot Slumberous(valera) -> Uncombined(valera)\nforall x (Touchable(x) -> Apical(x))\nforall x (Touchable(x) and not Miasmal(x) -> Spiderlike(x))\n\nMiasmal(valera)\n\nTouchable(valera) and forall x (Touchable(x) -> Apical(x)) -> therefore Apical(valera) Apical(valera) and forall x (Apical(x) -> Uncombined(x)) -> therefore Uncombined(valera) Uncombined(valera) and forall x (Uncombined(x) -> not Miasmal(x)) -> therefore not Miasmal(valera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Christen is pathetic. Northrop is not negligent. Alyce is pathetic. If Northrop is not adjacent then Northrop is mutilated. All negligent things are not mutilated. If something is formulated then it is negligent. If Christen is not adjacent then Christen is negligent. All pathetic things are formulated. If something is pathetic and not mutilated then it is sneak. Northrop is not formulated.", "logic": "\nPathetic(christen)\nnot Negligent(northrop)\nPathetic(alyce)\nnot Adjacent(northrop) -> Mutilated(northrop)\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> not Mutilated(x))\nforall x (Formulated(x) -> Negligent(x))\nnot Adjacent(christen) -> Negligent(christen)\nforall x (Pathetic(x) -> Formulated(x))\nforall x (Pathetic(x) and not Mutilated(x) -> Sneak(x))\n\nnot Formulated(northrop)\n\nforall x (Pathetic(x) -> Formulated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Jilli is spectral. Ricca is not sapphire. Solomon is spectral. If Ricca is not upfield then Ricca is blunt. All sapphire things are not blunt. If something is failing then it is sapphire. If Jilli is not upfield then Jilli is sapphire. All spectral things are failing. If something is spectral and not blunt then it is panegyric. Ricca is blunt.", "logic": "\nSpectral(jilli)\nnot Sapphire(ricca)\nSpectral(solomon)\nnot Upfield(ricca) -> Blunt(ricca)\nforall x (Sapphire(x) -> not Blunt(x))\nforall x (Failing(x) -> Sapphire(x))\nnot Upfield(jilli) -> Sapphire(jilli)\nforall x (Spectral(x) -> Failing(x))\nforall x (Spectral(x) and not Blunt(x) -> Panegyric(x))\n\nBlunt(ricca)\n\nnot Upfield(ricca) -> Blunt(ricca) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Hammad is antacid. Querida is not bleached. Jerrome is antacid. If Querida is not liberal then Querida is ceremonial. All bleached things are not ceremonial. If something is palatine then it is bleached. If Hammad is not liberal then Hammad is bleached. All antacid things are palatine. If something is antacid and not ceremonial then it is prohibited. Querida is not prohibited.", "logic": "\nAntacid(hammad)\nnot Bleached(querida)\nAntacid(jerrome)\nnot Liberal(querida) -> Ceremonial(querida)\nforall x (Bleached(x) -> not Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) -> Bleached(x))\nnot Liberal(hammad) -> Bleached(hammad)\nforall x (Antacid(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Antacid(x) and not Ceremonial(x) -> Prohibited(x))\n\nnot Prohibited(querida)\n\nforall x (Antacid(x) and not Ceremonial(x) -> Prohibited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Shani is polymeric. Daisi is not designate. Pam is polymeric. If Daisi is not pasted then Daisi is numerical. All designate things are not numerical. If something is dopy then it is designate. If Shani is not pasted then Shani is designate. All polymeric things are dopy. If something is polymeric and not numerical then it is sensory. Daisi is pasted.", "logic": "\nPolymeric(shani)\nnot Designate(daisi)\nPolymeric(pam)\nnot Pasted(daisi) -> Numerical(daisi)\nforall x (Designate(x) -> not Numerical(x))\nforall x (Dopy(x) -> Designate(x))\nnot Pasted(shani) -> Designate(shani)\nforall x (Polymeric(x) -> Dopy(x))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) and not Numerical(x) -> Sensory(x))\n\nPasted(daisi)\n\nPasted(daisi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Marijo is beefy. Vina is not manque. Dorita is beefy. If Vina is not groggy then Vina is surmounted. All manque things are not surmounted. If something is stubborn then it is manque. If Marijo is not groggy then Marijo is manque. All beefy things are stubborn. If something is beefy and not surmounted then it is bulky. Marijo is not groggy.", "logic": "\nBeefy(marijo)\nnot Manque(vina)\nBeefy(dorita)\nnot Groggy(vina) -> Surmounted(vina)\nforall x (Manque(x) -> not Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Manque(x))\nnot Groggy(marijo) -> Manque(marijo)\nforall x (Beefy(x) -> Stubborn(x))\nforall x (Beefy(x) and not Surmounted(x) -> Bulky(x))\n\nnot Groggy(marijo)\n\nnot Groggy(marijo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Stan is unfounded. Troy is not ubiquitous. Nichol is unfounded. If Troy is not quondam then Troy is waterworn. All ubiquitous things are not waterworn. If something is dutiable then it is ubiquitous. If Stan is not quondam then Stan is ubiquitous. All unfounded things are dutiable. If something is unfounded and not waterworn then it is praetorial. Troy is unfounded.", "logic": "\nUnfounded(stan)\nnot Ubiquitous(troy)\nUnfounded(nichol)\nnot Quondam(troy) -> Waterworn(troy)\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> not Waterworn(x))\nforall x (Dutiable(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\nnot Quondam(stan) -> Ubiquitous(stan)\nforall x (Unfounded(x) -> Dutiable(x))\nforall x (Unfounded(x) and not Waterworn(x) -> Praetorial(x))\n\nUnfounded(troy)\n\nUnfounded(troy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Cybel is binuclear. Beck is not liege. Dionis is binuclear. If Beck is not premedical then Beck is actinic. All liege things are not actinic. If something is staged then it is liege. If Cybel is not premedical then Cybel is liege. All binuclear things are staged. If something is binuclear and not actinic then it is compact. Cybel is not blue.", "logic": "\nBinuclear(cybel)\nnot Liege(beck)\nBinuclear(dionis)\nnot Premedical(beck) -> Actinic(beck)\nforall x (Liege(x) -> not Actinic(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) -> Liege(x))\nnot Premedical(cybel) -> Liege(cybel)\nforall x (Binuclear(x) -> Staged(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and not Actinic(x) -> Compact(x))\n\nnot Blue(cybel)\n\nnot Blue(cybel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Muriel is furthest. Raimund is not rayless. Francoise is furthest. If Raimund is not creepy then Raimund is cadaveric. All rayless things are not cadaveric. If something is sluggish then it is rayless. If Muriel is not creepy then Muriel is rayless. All furthest things are sluggish. If something is furthest and not cadaveric then it is wordy. Francoise is creepy.", "logic": "\nFurthest(muriel)\nnot Rayless(raimund)\nFurthest(francoise)\nnot Creepy(raimund) -> Cadaveric(raimund)\nforall x (Rayless(x) -> not Cadaveric(x))\nforall x (Sluggish(x) -> Rayless(x))\nnot Creepy(muriel) -> Rayless(muriel)\nforall x (Furthest(x) -> Sluggish(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and not Cadaveric(x) -> Wordy(x))\n\nCreepy(francoise)\n\nCreepy(francoise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Garp is expansive. Miguela is salient. Stanton is vibrionic. Zach is expansive. All capetian, expansive people are batwing. Young people are stressful. If someone is vibrionic and stressful then they are stocky. If Stanton is stocky then Stanton is vibrionic. All capetian people are batwing. All salient people are vibrionic. Stanton is vibrionic.", "logic": "\nExpansive(garp)\nSalient(miguela)\nVibrionic(stanton)\nExpansive(zach)\nforall x (Capetian(x) and Expansive(x) -> Batwing(x))\nforall x (Vibrionic(x) -> Stressful(x))\nforall x (Vibrionic(x) and Stressful(x) -> Stocky(x))\nStocky(stanton) -> Vibrionic(stanton)\nforall x (Capetian(x) -> Batwing(x))\nforall x (Salient(x) -> Vibrionic(x))\n\nVibrionic(stanton)\n\ntherefore Vibrionic(stanton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Ambrose is paltry. Natty is addible. Marja is unredeemed. Susy is paltry. All acerb, paltry people are advertised. Young people are crustal. If someone is unredeemed and crustal then they are blueish. If Marja is blueish then Marja is unredeemed. All acerb people are advertised. All addible people are unredeemed. Ambrose is not paltry.", "logic": "\nPaltry(ambrose)\nAddible(natty)\nUnredeemed(marja)\nPaltry(susy)\nforall x (Acerb(x) and Paltry(x) -> Advertised(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Crustal(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and Crustal(x) -> Blueish(x))\nBlueish(marja) -> Unredeemed(marja)\nforall x (Acerb(x) -> Advertised(x))\nforall x (Addible(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\n\nnot Paltry(ambrose)\n\ntherefore Paltry(ambrose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Ivie is sickish. Barde is nonporous. Genia is vagile. Dove is sickish. All excursive, sickish people are dominant. Young people are bugged. If someone is vagile and bugged then they are bolivian. If Genia is bolivian then Genia is vagile. All excursive people are dominant. All nonporous people are vagile. Barde is vagile.", "logic": "\nSickish(ivie)\nNonporous(barde)\nVagile(genia)\nSickish(dove)\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Sickish(x) -> Dominant(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) -> Bugged(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) and Bugged(x) -> Bolivian(x))\nBolivian(genia) -> Vagile(genia)\nforall x (Excursive(x) -> Dominant(x))\nforall x (Nonporous(x) -> Vagile(x))\n\nVagile(barde)\n\nNonporous(barde) and forall x (Nonporous(x) -> Vagile(x)) -> therefore Vagile(barde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Belicia is adoring. Blanch is bully. Vernice is polluted. Ulrica is adoring. All etiologic, adoring people are itinerant. Young people are true. If someone is polluted and true then they are calyculate. If Vernice is calyculate then Vernice is polluted. All etiologic people are itinerant. All bully people are polluted. Vernice is not true.", "logic": "\nAdoring(belicia)\nBully(blanch)\nPolluted(vernice)\nAdoring(ulrica)\nforall x (Etiologic(x) and Adoring(x) -> Itinerant(x))\nforall x (Polluted(x) -> True(x))\nforall x (Polluted(x) and True(x) -> Calyculate(x))\nCalyculate(vernice) -> Polluted(vernice)\nforall x (Etiologic(x) -> Itinerant(x))\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Polluted(x))\n\nnot True(vernice)\n\nPolluted(vernice) and forall x (Polluted(x) -> True(x)) -> therefore True(vernice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Pincus is enlarged. Berrie is melted. Electra is beetling. Inglebert is enlarged. All pneumatic, enlarged people are swampy. Young people are raddled. If someone is beetling and raddled then they are depressing. If Electra is depressing then Electra is beetling. All pneumatic people are swampy. All melted people are beetling. Berrie is raddled.", "logic": "\nEnlarged(pincus)\nMelted(berrie)\nBeetling(electra)\nEnlarged(inglebert)\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Enlarged(x) -> Swampy(x))\nforall x (Beetling(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Beetling(x) and Raddled(x) -> Depressing(x))\nDepressing(electra) -> Beetling(electra)\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) -> Swampy(x))\nforall x (Melted(x) -> Beetling(x))\n\nRaddled(berrie)\n\nMelted(berrie) and forall x (Melted(x) -> Beetling(x)) -> therefore Beetling(berrie) Beetling(berrie) and forall x (Beetling(x) -> Raddled(x)) -> therefore Raddled(berrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Trace is tonic. Stephana is indoor. Lissy is awakened. Elana is tonic. All placable, tonic people are moblike. Young people are foreboding. If someone is awakened and foreboding then they are umbellate. If Lissy is umbellate then Lissy is awakened. All placable people are moblike. All indoor people are awakened. Lissy is not umbellate.", "logic": "\nTonic(trace)\nIndoor(stephana)\nAwakened(lissy)\nTonic(elana)\nforall x (Placable(x) and Tonic(x) -> Moblike(x))\nforall x (Awakened(x) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Awakened(x) and Foreboding(x) -> Umbellate(x))\nUmbellate(lissy) -> Awakened(lissy)\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Moblike(x))\nforall x (Indoor(x) -> Awakened(x))\n\nnot Umbellate(lissy)\n\nAwakened(lissy) and forall x (Awakened(x) -> Foreboding(x)) -> therefore Foreboding(lissy) Awakened(lissy) and Foreboding(lissy) and forall x (Awakened(x) and Foreboding(x) -> Umbellate(x)) -> therefore Umbellate(lissy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Laurie is shrieked. Sheff is writhing. Shurwood is conic. Garnet is shrieked. All mitotic, shrieked people are columned. Young people are mimetic. If someone is conic and mimetic then they are untactful. If Shurwood is untactful then Shurwood is conic. All mitotic people are columned. All writhing people are conic. Sheff is untactful.", "logic": "\nShrieked(laurie)\nWrithing(sheff)\nConic(shurwood)\nShrieked(garnet)\nforall x (Mitotic(x) and Shrieked(x) -> Columned(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) and Mimetic(x) -> Untactful(x))\nUntactful(shurwood) -> Conic(shurwood)\nforall x (Mitotic(x) -> Columned(x))\nforall x (Writhing(x) -> Conic(x))\n\nUntactful(sheff)\n\nWrithing(sheff) and forall x (Writhing(x) -> Conic(x)) -> therefore Conic(sheff) Writhing(sheff) and forall x (Writhing(x) -> Conic(x)) -> therefore Conic(sheff) Conic(sheff) and forall x (Conic(x) -> Mimetic(x)) -> therefore Mimetic(sheff) Conic(sheff) and Mimetic(sheff) and forall x (Conic(x) and Mimetic(x) -> Untactful(x)) -> therefore Untactful(sheff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Cristina is iridic. Joelly is unoccupied. Elyssa is antiknock. Lizbeth is iridic. All skirting, iridic people are intrinsic. Young people are communal. If someone is antiknock and communal then they are slopped. If Elyssa is slopped then Elyssa is antiknock. All skirting people are intrinsic. All unoccupied people are antiknock. Joelly is not slopped.", "logic": "\nIridic(cristina)\nUnoccupied(joelly)\nAntiknock(elyssa)\nIridic(lizbeth)\nforall x (Skirting(x) and Iridic(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Antiknock(x) -> Communal(x))\nforall x (Antiknock(x) and Communal(x) -> Slopped(x))\nSlopped(elyssa) -> Antiknock(elyssa)\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Unoccupied(x) -> Antiknock(x))\n\nnot Slopped(joelly)\n\nUnoccupied(joelly) and forall x (Unoccupied(x) -> Antiknock(x)) -> therefore Antiknock(joelly) Unoccupied(joelly) and forall x (Unoccupied(x) -> Antiknock(x)) -> therefore Antiknock(joelly) Antiknock(joelly) and forall x (Antiknock(x) -> Communal(x)) -> therefore Communal(joelly) Antiknock(joelly) and Communal(joelly) and forall x (Antiknock(x) and Communal(x) -> Slopped(x)) -> therefore Slopped(joelly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Ivonne is regal. Oswell is halting. Paddy is epizootic. Lucius is regal. All concise, regal people are imposed. Young people are dauntless. If someone is epizootic and dauntless then they are punitory. If Paddy is punitory then Paddy is epizootic. All concise people are imposed. All halting people are epizootic. Ivonne is not dauntless.", "logic": "\nRegal(ivonne)\nHalting(oswell)\nEpizootic(paddy)\nRegal(lucius)\nforall x (Concise(x) and Regal(x) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Dauntless(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) and Dauntless(x) -> Punitory(x))\nPunitory(paddy) -> Epizootic(paddy)\nforall x (Concise(x) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Halting(x) -> Epizootic(x))\n\nnot Dauntless(ivonne)\n\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Dauntless(x)) <- forall x (Halting(x) -> Epizootic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Gearard is umbilical. Joelly is gratis. Shepard is disarming. Niki is umbilical. All ungummed, umbilical people are frilly. Young people are gold. If someone is disarming and gold then they are clashing. If Shepard is clashing then Shepard is disarming. All ungummed people are frilly. All gratis people are disarming. Shepard is frilly.", "logic": "\nUmbilical(gearard)\nGratis(joelly)\nDisarming(shepard)\nUmbilical(niki)\nforall x (Ungummed(x) and Umbilical(x) -> Frilly(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Gold(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) and Gold(x) -> Clashing(x))\nClashing(shepard) -> Disarming(shepard)\nforall x (Ungummed(x) -> Frilly(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> Disarming(x))\n\nFrilly(shepard)\n\nforall x (Ungummed(x) and Umbilical(x) -> Frilly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Mickey is belittling. Lolande is bruising. Yehudi is winsome. Bobby is belittling. All teen, belittling people are changeful. Young people are basic. If someone is winsome and basic then they are bony. If Yehudi is bony then Yehudi is winsome. All teen people are changeful. All bruising people are winsome. Mickey is not changeful.", "logic": "\nBelittling(mickey)\nBruising(lolande)\nWinsome(yehudi)\nBelittling(bobby)\nforall x (Teen(x) and Belittling(x) -> Changeful(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) -> Basic(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Basic(x) -> Bony(x))\nBony(yehudi) -> Winsome(yehudi)\nforall x (Teen(x) -> Changeful(x))\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> Winsome(x))\n\nnot Changeful(mickey)\n\nforall x (Teen(x) and Belittling(x) -> Changeful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Ashlee is sedgelike. Roz is acicular. Maribeth is sanitized. Oliver is sedgelike. All anterior, sedgelike people are shapeless. Young people are antiviral. If someone is sanitized and antiviral then they are bathetic. If Maribeth is bathetic then Maribeth is sanitized. All anterior people are shapeless. All acicular people are sanitized. Roz is shapeless.", "logic": "\nSedgelike(ashlee)\nAcicular(roz)\nSanitized(maribeth)\nSedgelike(oliver)\nforall x (Anterior(x) and Sedgelike(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) -> Antiviral(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) and Antiviral(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nBathetic(maribeth) -> Sanitized(maribeth)\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Acicular(x) -> Sanitized(x))\n\nShapeless(roz)\n\nforall x (Anterior(x) and Sedgelike(x) -> Shapeless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Kellyann is doomed. Shirlene is bored. Kacy is topical. Sigfrid is doomed. All papistical, doomed people are matured. Young people are autologous. If someone is topical and autologous then they are mucinous. If Kacy is mucinous then Kacy is topical. All papistical people are matured. All bored people are topical. Kacy is not doomed.", "logic": "\nDoomed(kellyann)\nBored(shirlene)\nTopical(kacy)\nDoomed(sigfrid)\nforall x (Papistical(x) and Doomed(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) -> Autologous(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) and Autologous(x) -> Mucinous(x))\nMucinous(kacy) -> Topical(kacy)\nforall x (Papistical(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Topical(x))\n\nnot Doomed(kacy)\n\nnot Doomed(kacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Evania is vegetative. Row is unmade. Malvina is fetching. Sarena is vegetative. All protozoic, vegetative people are contorted. Young people are butcherly. If someone is fetching and butcherly then they are confusing. If Malvina is confusing then Malvina is fetching. All protozoic people are contorted. All unmade people are fetching. Row is protozoic.", "logic": "\nVegetative(evania)\nUnmade(row)\nFetching(malvina)\nVegetative(sarena)\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and Vegetative(x) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Fetching(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Fetching(x) and Butcherly(x) -> Confusing(x))\nConfusing(malvina) -> Fetching(malvina)\nforall x (Protozoic(x) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Fetching(x))\n\nProtozoic(row)\n\nProtozoic(row) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Edithe is drilled. Birgitta is secret. Elwira is demulcent. Anatole is drilled. All sweet, drilled people are saprobic. Young people are ransacked. If someone is demulcent and ransacked then they are tidy. If Elwira is tidy then Elwira is demulcent. All sweet people are saprobic. All secret people are demulcent. Edithe is not sweet.", "logic": "\nDrilled(edithe)\nSecret(birgitta)\nDemulcent(elwira)\nDrilled(anatole)\nforall x (Sweet(x) and Drilled(x) -> Saprobic(x))\nforall x (Demulcent(x) -> Ransacked(x))\nforall x (Demulcent(x) and Ransacked(x) -> Tidy(x))\nTidy(elwira) -> Demulcent(elwira)\nforall x (Sweet(x) -> Saprobic(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) -> Demulcent(x))\n\nnot Sweet(edithe)\n\nnot Sweet(edithe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Aeriel is killable. Osbert is kooky. Lissie is dionysian. Son is killable. All adsorbent, killable people are inchoative. Young people are dissilient. If someone is dionysian and dissilient then they are exoergic. If Lissie is exoergic then Lissie is dionysian. All adsorbent people are inchoative. All kooky people are dionysian. Lissie is adsorbent.", "logic": "\nKillable(aeriel)\nKooky(osbert)\nDionysian(lissie)\nKillable(son)\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) and Killable(x) -> Inchoative(x))\nforall x (Dionysian(x) -> Dissilient(x))\nforall x (Dionysian(x) and Dissilient(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nExoergic(lissie) -> Dionysian(lissie)\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Inchoative(x))\nforall x (Kooky(x) -> Dionysian(x))\n\nAdsorbent(lissie)\n\nAdsorbent(lissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "The vernor wring the vladimir. The vernor menace the aridatha. The vernor film the ralina. The vladimir menace the ralina. The aridatha is exilic. The aridatha menace the vladimir. The aridatha film the ralina. The ralina wring the aridatha. The ralina is anionic. The ralina menace the vernor. If someone is exilic and they chase the vernor then they chase the ralina. If the vernor wring the vladimir then the vernor film the vladimir. If someone film the vladimir and they like the aridatha then the aridatha wring the vernor. If someone wring the vladimir and the vladimir is anionic then they chase the ralina. If the aridatha is arthurian then the aridatha wring the ralina. If someone wring the ralina and the ralina film the vernor then they chase the aridatha. The vernor film the ralina.", "logic": "\nWring(vernor, vladimir)\nMenace(vernor, aridatha)\nFilm(vernor, ralina)\nMenace(vladimir, ralina)\nExilic(aridatha)\nMenace(aridatha, vladimir)\nFilm(aridatha, ralina)\nWring(ralina, aridatha)\nAnionic(ralina)\nMenace(ralina, vernor)\nforall x (Exilic(x) and Wring(x, vernor) -> Wring(x, ralina))\nWring(vernor, vladimir) -> Film(vernor, vladimir)\nforall x (Film(x, vladimir) and Menace(x, aridatha) -> Wring(aridatha, vernor))\nforall x (Wring(x, vladimir) and Anionic(vladimir) -> Wring(x, ralina))\nArthurian(aridatha) -> Wring(aridatha, ralina)\nforall x (Wring(x, ralina) and Film(ralina, vernor) -> Wring(x, aridatha))\n\nFilm(vernor, ralina)\n\ntherefore Film(vernor, ralina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The gillian loop the heidie. The gillian signalise the mignon. The gillian concretize the rosamond. The heidie signalise the rosamond. The mignon is gummed. The mignon signalise the heidie. The mignon concretize the rosamond. The rosamond loop the mignon. The rosamond is silenced. The rosamond signalise the gillian. If someone is gummed and they chase the gillian then they chase the rosamond. If the gillian loop the heidie then the gillian concretize the heidie. If someone concretize the heidie and they like the mignon then the mignon loop the gillian. If someone loop the heidie and the heidie is silenced then they chase the rosamond. If the mignon is boreal then the mignon loop the rosamond. If someone loop the rosamond and the rosamond concretize the gillian then they chase the mignon. The heidie does not like the rosamond.", "logic": "\nLoop(gillian, heidie)\nSignalise(gillian, mignon)\nConcretize(gillian, rosamond)\nSignalise(heidie, rosamond)\nGummed(mignon)\nSignalise(mignon, heidie)\nConcretize(mignon, rosamond)\nLoop(rosamond, mignon)\nSilenced(rosamond)\nSignalise(rosamond, gillian)\nforall x (Gummed(x) and Loop(x, gillian) -> Loop(x, rosamond))\nLoop(gillian, heidie) -> Concretize(gillian, heidie)\nforall x (Concretize(x, heidie) and Signalise(x, mignon) -> Loop(mignon, gillian))\nforall x (Loop(x, heidie) and Silenced(heidie) -> Loop(x, rosamond))\nBoreal(mignon) -> Loop(mignon, rosamond)\nforall x (Loop(x, rosamond) and Concretize(rosamond, gillian) -> Loop(x, mignon))\n\nnot Signalise(heidie, rosamond)\n\ntherefore Signalise(heidie, rosamond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The anna decertify the adrea. The anna starboard the teri. The anna transpose the rube. The adrea starboard the rube. The teri is revolved. The teri starboard the adrea. The teri transpose the rube. The rube decertify the teri. The rube is sobersided. The rube starboard the anna. If someone is revolved and they chase the anna then they chase the rube. If the anna decertify the adrea then the anna transpose the adrea. If someone transpose the adrea and they like the teri then the teri decertify the anna. If someone decertify the adrea and the adrea is sobersided then they chase the rube. If the teri is outclassed then the teri decertify the rube. If someone decertify the rube and the rube transpose the anna then they chase the teri. The anna transpose the adrea.", "logic": "\nDecertify(anna, adrea)\nStarboard(anna, teri)\nTranspose(anna, rube)\nStarboard(adrea, rube)\nRevolved(teri)\nStarboard(teri, adrea)\nTranspose(teri, rube)\nDecertify(rube, teri)\nSobersided(rube)\nStarboard(rube, anna)\nforall x (Revolved(x) and Decertify(x, anna) -> Decertify(x, rube))\nDecertify(anna, adrea) -> Transpose(anna, adrea)\nforall x (Transpose(x, adrea) and Starboard(x, teri) -> Decertify(teri, anna))\nforall x (Decertify(x, adrea) and Sobersided(adrea) -> Decertify(x, rube))\nOutclassed(teri) -> Decertify(teri, rube)\nforall x (Decertify(x, rube) and Transpose(rube, anna) -> Decertify(x, teri))\n\nTranspose(anna, adrea)\n\nDecertify(anna, adrea) and Decertify(anna, adrea) -> Transpose(anna, adrea) -> therefore Transpose(anna, adrea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The clarisa induce the weylin. The clarisa alternate the kelsey. The clarisa glamourise the gardiner. The weylin alternate the gardiner. The kelsey is asteroid. The kelsey alternate the weylin. The kelsey glamourise the gardiner. The gardiner induce the kelsey. The gardiner is consonant. The gardiner alternate the clarisa. If someone is asteroid and they chase the clarisa then they chase the gardiner. If the clarisa induce the weylin then the clarisa glamourise the weylin. If someone glamourise the weylin and they like the kelsey then the kelsey induce the clarisa. If someone induce the weylin and the weylin is consonant then they chase the gardiner. If the kelsey is lobated then the kelsey induce the gardiner. If someone induce the gardiner and the gardiner glamourise the clarisa then they chase the kelsey. The clarisa does not need the weylin.", "logic": "\nInduce(clarisa, weylin)\nAlternate(clarisa, kelsey)\nGlamourise(clarisa, gardiner)\nAlternate(weylin, gardiner)\nAsteroid(kelsey)\nAlternate(kelsey, weylin)\nGlamourise(kelsey, gardiner)\nInduce(gardiner, kelsey)\nConsonant(gardiner)\nAlternate(gardiner, clarisa)\nforall x (Asteroid(x) and Induce(x, clarisa) -> Induce(x, gardiner))\nInduce(clarisa, weylin) -> Glamourise(clarisa, weylin)\nforall x (Glamourise(x, weylin) and Alternate(x, kelsey) -> Induce(kelsey, clarisa))\nforall x (Induce(x, weylin) and Consonant(weylin) -> Induce(x, gardiner))\nLobated(kelsey) -> Induce(kelsey, gardiner)\nforall x (Induce(x, gardiner) and Glamourise(gardiner, clarisa) -> Induce(x, kelsey))\n\nnot Glamourise(clarisa, weylin)\n\nInduce(clarisa, weylin) and Induce(clarisa, weylin) -> Glamourise(clarisa, weylin) -> therefore Glamourise(clarisa, weylin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The giralda bake the dorrie. The giralda reenforce the sapphira. The giralda dose the enrique. The dorrie reenforce the enrique. The sapphira is whorled. The sapphira reenforce the dorrie. The sapphira dose the enrique. The enrique bake the sapphira. The enrique is unsavoury. The enrique reenforce the giralda. If someone is whorled and they chase the giralda then they chase the enrique. If the giralda bake the dorrie then the giralda dose the dorrie. If someone dose the dorrie and they like the sapphira then the sapphira bake the giralda. If someone bake the dorrie and the dorrie is unsavoury then they chase the enrique. If the sapphira is tattered then the sapphira bake the enrique. If someone bake the enrique and the enrique dose the giralda then they chase the sapphira. The sapphira bake the giralda.", "logic": "\nBake(giralda, dorrie)\nReenforce(giralda, sapphira)\nDose(giralda, enrique)\nReenforce(dorrie, enrique)\nWhorled(sapphira)\nReenforce(sapphira, dorrie)\nDose(sapphira, enrique)\nBake(enrique, sapphira)\nUnsavoury(enrique)\nReenforce(enrique, giralda)\nforall x (Whorled(x) and Bake(x, giralda) -> Bake(x, enrique))\nBake(giralda, dorrie) -> Dose(giralda, dorrie)\nforall x (Dose(x, dorrie) and Reenforce(x, sapphira) -> Bake(sapphira, giralda))\nforall x (Bake(x, dorrie) and Unsavoury(dorrie) -> Bake(x, enrique))\nTattered(sapphira) -> Bake(sapphira, enrique)\nforall x (Bake(x, enrique) and Dose(enrique, giralda) -> Bake(x, sapphira))\n\nBake(sapphira, giralda)\n\nBake(giralda, dorrie) and Bake(giralda, dorrie) -> Dose(giralda, dorrie) -> therefore Dose(giralda, dorrie) Dose(giralda, dorrie) and Reenforce(giralda, sapphira) and forall x (Dose(x, dorrie) and Reenforce(x, sapphira) -> Bake(sapphira, giralda)) -> therefore Bake(sapphira, giralda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The mikey culture the chryste. The mikey vouchsafe the gussie. The mikey toll the christy. The chryste vouchsafe the christy. The gussie is prescient. The gussie vouchsafe the chryste. The gussie toll the christy. The christy culture the gussie. The christy is corbelled. The christy vouchsafe the mikey. If someone is prescient and they chase the mikey then they chase the christy. If the mikey culture the chryste then the mikey toll the chryste. If someone toll the chryste and they like the gussie then the gussie culture the mikey. If someone culture the chryste and the chryste is corbelled then they chase the christy. If the gussie is factitious then the gussie culture the christy. If someone culture the christy and the christy toll the mikey then they chase the gussie. The gussie does not chase the mikey.", "logic": "\nCulture(mikey, chryste)\nVouchsafe(mikey, gussie)\nToll(mikey, christy)\nVouchsafe(chryste, christy)\nPrescient(gussie)\nVouchsafe(gussie, chryste)\nToll(gussie, christy)\nCulture(christy, gussie)\nCorbelled(christy)\nVouchsafe(christy, mikey)\nforall x (Prescient(x) and Culture(x, mikey) -> Culture(x, christy))\nCulture(mikey, chryste) -> Toll(mikey, chryste)\nforall x (Toll(x, chryste) and Vouchsafe(x, gussie) -> Culture(gussie, mikey))\nforall x (Culture(x, chryste) and Corbelled(chryste) -> Culture(x, christy))\nFactitious(gussie) -> Culture(gussie, christy)\nforall x (Culture(x, christy) and Toll(christy, mikey) -> Culture(x, gussie))\n\nnot Culture(gussie, mikey)\n\nCulture(mikey, chryste) and Culture(mikey, chryste) -> Toll(mikey, chryste) -> therefore Toll(mikey, chryste) Toll(mikey, chryste) and Vouchsafe(mikey, gussie) and forall x (Toll(x, chryste) and Vouchsafe(x, gussie) -> Culture(gussie, mikey)) -> therefore Culture(gussie, mikey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The deny baby the mellicent. The deny dong the miguelita. The deny separate the felita. The mellicent dong the felita. The miguelita is eremitical. The miguelita dong the mellicent. The miguelita separate the felita. The felita baby the miguelita. The felita is mesic. The felita dong the deny. If someone is eremitical and they chase the deny then they chase the felita. If the deny baby the mellicent then the deny separate the mellicent. If someone separate the mellicent and they like the miguelita then the miguelita baby the deny. If someone baby the mellicent and the mellicent is mesic then they chase the felita. If the miguelita is stifling then the miguelita baby the felita. If someone baby the felita and the felita separate the deny then they chase the miguelita. The miguelita baby the felita.", "logic": "\nBaby(deny, mellicent)\nDong(deny, miguelita)\nSeparate(deny, felita)\nDong(mellicent, felita)\nEremitical(miguelita)\nDong(miguelita, mellicent)\nSeparate(miguelita, felita)\nBaby(felita, miguelita)\nMesic(felita)\nDong(felita, deny)\nforall x (Eremitical(x) and Baby(x, deny) -> Baby(x, felita))\nBaby(deny, mellicent) -> Separate(deny, mellicent)\nforall x (Separate(x, mellicent) and Dong(x, miguelita) -> Baby(miguelita, deny))\nforall x (Baby(x, mellicent) and Mesic(mellicent) -> Baby(x, felita))\nStifling(miguelita) -> Baby(miguelita, felita)\nforall x (Baby(x, felita) and Separate(felita, deny) -> Baby(x, miguelita))\n\nBaby(miguelita, felita)\n\nBaby(deny, mellicent) and Baby(deny, mellicent) -> Separate(deny, mellicent) -> therefore Separate(deny, mellicent) Separate(deny, mellicent) and Dong(deny, miguelita) and forall x (Separate(x, mellicent) and Dong(x, miguelita) -> Baby(miguelita, deny)) -> therefore Baby(miguelita, deny) Eremitical(miguelita) and Baby(miguelita, deny) and forall x (Eremitical(x) and Baby(x, deny) -> Baby(x, felita)) -> therefore Baby(miguelita, felita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The jud scrimshank the simeon. The jud gather the cobbie. The jud ache the caterina. The simeon gather the caterina. The cobbie is congestive. The cobbie gather the simeon. The cobbie ache the caterina. The caterina scrimshank the cobbie. The caterina is dyspneal. The caterina gather the jud. If someone is congestive and they chase the jud then they chase the caterina. If the jud scrimshank the simeon then the jud ache the simeon. If someone ache the simeon and they like the cobbie then the cobbie scrimshank the jud. If someone scrimshank the simeon and the simeon is dyspneal then they chase the caterina. If the cobbie is germane then the cobbie scrimshank the caterina. If someone scrimshank the caterina and the caterina ache the jud then they chase the cobbie. The cobbie does not chase the caterina.", "logic": "\nScrimshank(jud, simeon)\nGather(jud, cobbie)\nAche(jud, caterina)\nGather(simeon, caterina)\nCongestive(cobbie)\nGather(cobbie, simeon)\nAche(cobbie, caterina)\nScrimshank(caterina, cobbie)\nDyspneal(caterina)\nGather(caterina, jud)\nforall x (Congestive(x) and Scrimshank(x, jud) -> Scrimshank(x, caterina))\nScrimshank(jud, simeon) -> Ache(jud, simeon)\nforall x (Ache(x, simeon) and Gather(x, cobbie) -> Scrimshank(cobbie, jud))\nforall x (Scrimshank(x, simeon) and Dyspneal(simeon) -> Scrimshank(x, caterina))\nGermane(cobbie) -> Scrimshank(cobbie, caterina)\nforall x (Scrimshank(x, caterina) and Ache(caterina, jud) -> Scrimshank(x, cobbie))\n\nnot Scrimshank(cobbie, caterina)\n\nScrimshank(jud, simeon) and Scrimshank(jud, simeon) -> Ache(jud, simeon) -> therefore Ache(jud, simeon) Ache(jud, simeon) and Gather(jud, cobbie) and forall x (Ache(x, simeon) and Gather(x, cobbie) -> Scrimshank(cobbie, jud)) -> therefore Scrimshank(cobbie, jud) Congestive(cobbie) and Scrimshank(cobbie, jud) and forall x (Congestive(x) and Scrimshank(x, jud) -> Scrimshank(x, caterina)) -> therefore Scrimshank(cobbie, caterina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The lebbie truckle the kermit. The lebbie pucker the leontyne. The lebbie copyright the erena. The kermit pucker the erena. The leontyne is languid. The leontyne pucker the kermit. The leontyne copyright the erena. The erena truckle the leontyne. The erena is decayable. The erena pucker the lebbie. If someone is languid and they chase the lebbie then they chase the erena. If the lebbie truckle the kermit then the lebbie copyright the kermit. If someone copyright the kermit and they like the leontyne then the leontyne truckle the lebbie. If someone truckle the kermit and the kermit is decayable then they chase the erena. If the leontyne is nonprofit then the leontyne truckle the erena. If someone truckle the erena and the erena copyright the lebbie then they chase the leontyne. The kermit does not chase the erena.", "logic": "\nTruckle(lebbie, kermit)\nPucker(lebbie, leontyne)\nCopyright(lebbie, erena)\nPucker(kermit, erena)\nLanguid(leontyne)\nPucker(leontyne, kermit)\nCopyright(leontyne, erena)\nTruckle(erena, leontyne)\nDecayable(erena)\nPucker(erena, lebbie)\nforall x (Languid(x) and Truckle(x, lebbie) -> Truckle(x, erena))\nTruckle(lebbie, kermit) -> Copyright(lebbie, kermit)\nforall x (Copyright(x, kermit) and Pucker(x, leontyne) -> Truckle(leontyne, lebbie))\nforall x (Truckle(x, kermit) and Decayable(kermit) -> Truckle(x, erena))\nNonprofit(leontyne) -> Truckle(leontyne, erena)\nforall x (Truckle(x, erena) and Copyright(erena, lebbie) -> Truckle(x, leontyne))\n\nnot Truckle(kermit, erena)\n\nforall x (Languid(x) and Truckle(x, lebbie) -> Truckle(x, erena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The merilyn practice the erhart. The merilyn star the avram. The merilyn presume the ingemar. The erhart star the ingemar. The avram is tasseled. The avram star the erhart. The avram presume the ingemar. The ingemar practice the avram. The ingemar is endearing. The ingemar star the merilyn. If someone is tasseled and they chase the merilyn then they chase the ingemar. If the merilyn practice the erhart then the merilyn presume the erhart. If someone presume the erhart and they like the avram then the avram practice the merilyn. If someone practice the erhart and the erhart is endearing then they chase the ingemar. If the avram is hogged then the avram practice the ingemar. If someone practice the ingemar and the ingemar presume the merilyn then they chase the avram. The erhart practice the avram.", "logic": "\nPractice(merilyn, erhart)\nStar(merilyn, avram)\nPresume(merilyn, ingemar)\nStar(erhart, ingemar)\nTasseled(avram)\nStar(avram, erhart)\nPresume(avram, ingemar)\nPractice(ingemar, avram)\nEndearing(ingemar)\nStar(ingemar, merilyn)\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Practice(x, merilyn) -> Practice(x, ingemar))\nPractice(merilyn, erhart) -> Presume(merilyn, erhart)\nforall x (Presume(x, erhart) and Star(x, avram) -> Practice(avram, merilyn))\nforall x (Practice(x, erhart) and Endearing(erhart) -> Practice(x, ingemar))\nHogged(avram) -> Practice(avram, ingemar)\nforall x (Practice(x, ingemar) and Presume(ingemar, merilyn) -> Practice(x, avram))\n\nPractice(erhart, avram)\n\nforall x (Practice(x, ingemar) and Presume(ingemar, merilyn) -> Practice(x, avram)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The gennifer retrograde the abbe. The gennifer pledge the agnese. The gennifer demonetize the arda. The abbe pledge the arda. The agnese is stitched. The agnese pledge the abbe. The agnese demonetize the arda. The arda retrograde the agnese. The arda is licentious. The arda pledge the gennifer. If someone is stitched and they chase the gennifer then they chase the arda. If the gennifer retrograde the abbe then the gennifer demonetize the abbe. If someone demonetize the abbe and they like the agnese then the agnese retrograde the gennifer. If someone retrograde the abbe and the abbe is licentious then they chase the arda. If the agnese is retained then the agnese retrograde the arda. If someone retrograde the arda and the arda demonetize the gennifer then they chase the agnese. The gennifer does not chase the agnese.", "logic": "\nRetrograde(gennifer, abbe)\nPledge(gennifer, agnese)\nDemonetize(gennifer, arda)\nPledge(abbe, arda)\nStitched(agnese)\nPledge(agnese, abbe)\nDemonetize(agnese, arda)\nRetrograde(arda, agnese)\nLicentious(arda)\nPledge(arda, gennifer)\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Retrograde(x, gennifer) -> Retrograde(x, arda))\nRetrograde(gennifer, abbe) -> Demonetize(gennifer, abbe)\nforall x (Demonetize(x, abbe) and Pledge(x, agnese) -> Retrograde(agnese, gennifer))\nforall x (Retrograde(x, abbe) and Licentious(abbe) -> Retrograde(x, arda))\nRetained(agnese) -> Retrograde(agnese, arda)\nforall x (Retrograde(x, arda) and Demonetize(arda, gennifer) -> Retrograde(x, agnese))\n\nnot Retrograde(gennifer, agnese)\n\nforall x (Retrograde(x, arda) and Demonetize(arda, gennifer) -> Retrograde(x, agnese)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The costa treble the cary. The costa harmonize the barclay. The costa sensify the aubine. The cary harmonize the aubine. The barclay is reproving. The barclay harmonize the cary. The barclay sensify the aubine. The aubine treble the barclay. The aubine is addicted. The aubine harmonize the costa. If someone is reproving and they chase the costa then they chase the aubine. If the costa treble the cary then the costa sensify the cary. If someone sensify the cary and they like the barclay then the barclay treble the costa. If someone treble the cary and the cary is addicted then they chase the aubine. If the barclay is motherless then the barclay treble the aubine. If someone treble the aubine and the aubine sensify the costa then they chase the barclay. The costa treble the aubine.", "logic": "\nTreble(costa, cary)\nHarmonize(costa, barclay)\nSensify(costa, aubine)\nHarmonize(cary, aubine)\nReproving(barclay)\nHarmonize(barclay, cary)\nSensify(barclay, aubine)\nTreble(aubine, barclay)\nAddicted(aubine)\nHarmonize(aubine, costa)\nforall x (Reproving(x) and Treble(x, costa) -> Treble(x, aubine))\nTreble(costa, cary) -> Sensify(costa, cary)\nforall x (Sensify(x, cary) and Harmonize(x, barclay) -> Treble(barclay, costa))\nforall x (Treble(x, cary) and Addicted(cary) -> Treble(x, aubine))\nMotherless(barclay) -> Treble(barclay, aubine)\nforall x (Treble(x, aubine) and Sensify(aubine, costa) -> Treble(x, barclay))\n\nTreble(costa, aubine)\n\nforall x (Reproving(x) and Treble(x, costa) -> Treble(x, aubine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The mortie shock the magdaia. The mortie agonize the florencia. The mortie deceive the job. The magdaia agonize the job. The florencia is fired. The florencia agonize the magdaia. The florencia deceive the job. The job shock the florencia. The job is biweekly. The job agonize the mortie. If someone is fired and they chase the mortie then they chase the job. If the mortie shock the magdaia then the mortie deceive the magdaia. If someone deceive the magdaia and they like the florencia then the florencia shock the mortie. If someone shock the magdaia and the magdaia is biweekly then they chase the job. If the florencia is banded then the florencia shock the job. If someone shock the job and the job deceive the mortie then they chase the florencia. The florencia is not kind.", "logic": "\nShock(mortie, magdaia)\nAgonize(mortie, florencia)\nDeceive(mortie, job)\nAgonize(magdaia, job)\nFired(florencia)\nAgonize(florencia, magdaia)\nDeceive(florencia, job)\nShock(job, florencia)\nBiweekly(job)\nAgonize(job, mortie)\nforall x (Fired(x) and Shock(x, mortie) -> Shock(x, job))\nShock(mortie, magdaia) -> Deceive(mortie, magdaia)\nforall x (Deceive(x, magdaia) and Agonize(x, florencia) -> Shock(florencia, mortie))\nforall x (Shock(x, magdaia) and Biweekly(magdaia) -> Shock(x, job))\nBanded(florencia) -> Shock(florencia, job)\nforall x (Shock(x, job) and Deceive(job, mortie) -> Shock(x, florencia))\n\nnot Kind(florencia)\n\nnot Kind(florencia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The jamie throne the johnnie. The jamie believe the nicolea. The jamie wheeze the garp. The johnnie believe the garp. The nicolea is payable. The nicolea believe the johnnie. The nicolea wheeze the garp. The garp throne the nicolea. The garp is sublunary. The garp believe the jamie. If someone is payable and they chase the jamie then they chase the garp. If the jamie throne the johnnie then the jamie wheeze the johnnie. If someone wheeze the johnnie and they like the nicolea then the nicolea throne the jamie. If someone throne the johnnie and the johnnie is sublunary then they chase the garp. If the nicolea is anaclinal then the nicolea throne the garp. If someone throne the garp and the garp wheeze the jamie then they chase the nicolea. The johnnie wheeze the garp.", "logic": "\nThrone(jamie, johnnie)\nBelieve(jamie, nicolea)\nWheeze(jamie, garp)\nBelieve(johnnie, garp)\nPayable(nicolea)\nBelieve(nicolea, johnnie)\nWheeze(nicolea, garp)\nThrone(garp, nicolea)\nSublunary(garp)\nBelieve(garp, jamie)\nforall x (Payable(x) and Throne(x, jamie) -> Throne(x, garp))\nThrone(jamie, johnnie) -> Wheeze(jamie, johnnie)\nforall x (Wheeze(x, johnnie) and Believe(x, nicolea) -> Throne(nicolea, jamie))\nforall x (Throne(x, johnnie) and Sublunary(johnnie) -> Throne(x, garp))\nAnaclinal(nicolea) -> Throne(nicolea, garp)\nforall x (Throne(x, garp) and Wheeze(garp, jamie) -> Throne(x, nicolea))\n\nWheeze(johnnie, garp)\n\nWheeze(johnnie, garp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The maegan bill the modestia. The maegan palatalise the janith. The maegan continue the cob. The modestia palatalise the cob. The janith is midmost. The janith palatalise the modestia. The janith continue the cob. The cob bill the janith. The cob is least. The cob palatalise the maegan. If someone is midmost and they chase the maegan then they chase the cob. If the maegan bill the modestia then the maegan continue the modestia. If someone continue the modestia and they like the janith then the janith bill the maegan. If someone bill the modestia and the modestia is least then they chase the cob. If the janith is divalent then the janith bill the cob. If someone bill the cob and the cob continue the maegan then they chase the janith. The janith does not need the modestia.", "logic": "\nBill(maegan, modestia)\nPalatalise(maegan, janith)\nContinue(maegan, cob)\nPalatalise(modestia, cob)\nMidmost(janith)\nPalatalise(janith, modestia)\nContinue(janith, cob)\nBill(cob, janith)\nLeast(cob)\nPalatalise(cob, maegan)\nforall x (Midmost(x) and Bill(x, maegan) -> Bill(x, cob))\nBill(maegan, modestia) -> Continue(maegan, modestia)\nforall x (Continue(x, modestia) and Palatalise(x, janith) -> Bill(janith, maegan))\nforall x (Bill(x, modestia) and Least(modestia) -> Bill(x, cob))\nDivalent(janith) -> Bill(janith, cob)\nforall x (Bill(x, cob) and Continue(cob, maegan) -> Bill(x, janith))\n\nnot Continue(janith, modestia)\n\nnot Continue(janith, modestia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The dannye outshine the abdel. The dannye include the kylen. The dannye arraign the uli. The abdel include the uli. The kylen is oriental. The kylen include the abdel. The kylen arraign the uli. The uli outshine the kylen. The uli is replete. The uli include the dannye. If someone is oriental and they chase the dannye then they chase the uli. If the dannye outshine the abdel then the dannye arraign the abdel. If someone arraign the abdel and they like the kylen then the kylen outshine the dannye. If someone outshine the abdel and the abdel is replete then they chase the uli. If the kylen is amort then the kylen outshine the uli. If someone outshine the uli and the uli arraign the dannye then they chase the kylen. The uli is amort.", "logic": "\nOutshine(dannye, abdel)\nInclude(dannye, kylen)\nArraign(dannye, uli)\nInclude(abdel, uli)\nOriental(kylen)\nInclude(kylen, abdel)\nArraign(kylen, uli)\nOutshine(uli, kylen)\nReplete(uli)\nInclude(uli, dannye)\nforall x (Oriental(x) and Outshine(x, dannye) -> Outshine(x, uli))\nOutshine(dannye, abdel) -> Arraign(dannye, abdel)\nforall x (Arraign(x, abdel) and Include(x, kylen) -> Outshine(kylen, dannye))\nforall x (Outshine(x, abdel) and Replete(abdel) -> Outshine(x, uli))\nAmort(kylen) -> Outshine(kylen, uli)\nforall x (Outshine(x, uli) and Arraign(uli, dannye) -> Outshine(x, kylen))\n\nAmort(uli)\n\nAmort(uli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "Ranee is shrewd. Ranee is unexploded. Kathi is cockamamy. Kathi is intragroup. Kathi is unexploded. Aurelea is unexploded. Verge is boxlike. All intragroup people are homely. Red people are homely. Blue people are intragroup. Red, shrewd people are cockamamy. Blue, cockamamy people are shrewd. If someone is unexploded then they are boxlike. If Aurelea is boxlike and Aurelea is shrewd then Aurelea is unexploded. Big people are unexploded. Kathi is intragroup.", "logic": "\nShrewd(ranee)\nUnexploded(ranee)\nCockamamy(kathi)\nIntragroup(kathi)\nUnexploded(kathi)\nUnexploded(aurelea)\nBoxlike(verge)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) -> Homely(x))\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Homely(x))\nforall x (Homely(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Boxlike(x) and Shrewd(x) -> Cockamamy(x))\nforall x (Homely(x) and Cockamamy(x) -> Shrewd(x))\nforall x (Unexploded(x) -> Boxlike(x))\nBoxlike(aurelea) and Shrewd(aurelea) -> Unexploded(aurelea)\nforall x (Cockamamy(x) -> Unexploded(x))\n\nIntragroup(kathi)\n\ntherefore Intragroup(kathi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Salem is literal. Salem is seeable. Warren is reborn. Warren is voltarian. Warren is seeable. Noella is seeable. Chas is groomed. All voltarian people are streaming. Red people are streaming. Blue people are voltarian. Red, literal people are reborn. Blue, reborn people are literal. If someone is seeable then they are groomed. If Noella is groomed and Noella is literal then Noella is seeable. Big people are seeable. Chas is not groomed.", "logic": "\nLiteral(salem)\nSeeable(salem)\nReborn(warren)\nVoltarian(warren)\nSeeable(warren)\nSeeable(noella)\nGroomed(chas)\nforall x (Voltarian(x) -> Streaming(x))\nforall x (Groomed(x) -> Streaming(x))\nforall x (Streaming(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Groomed(x) and Literal(x) -> Reborn(x))\nforall x (Streaming(x) and Reborn(x) -> Literal(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) -> Groomed(x))\nGroomed(noella) and Literal(noella) -> Seeable(noella)\nforall x (Reborn(x) -> Seeable(x))\n\nnot Groomed(chas)\n\ntherefore Groomed(chas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Russell is stately. Russell is flying. Rori is twinning. Rori is arranged. Rori is flying. Jasmina is flying. Laurence is tensional. All arranged people are feudal. Red people are feudal. Blue people are arranged. Red, stately people are twinning. Blue, twinning people are stately. If someone is flying then they are tensional. If Jasmina is tensional and Jasmina is stately then Jasmina is flying. Big people are flying. Russell is tensional.", "logic": "\nStately(russell)\nFlying(russell)\nTwinning(rori)\nArranged(rori)\nFlying(rori)\nFlying(jasmina)\nTensional(laurence)\nforall x (Arranged(x) -> Feudal(x))\nforall x (Tensional(x) -> Feudal(x))\nforall x (Feudal(x) -> Arranged(x))\nforall x (Tensional(x) and Stately(x) -> Twinning(x))\nforall x (Feudal(x) and Twinning(x) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Tensional(x))\nTensional(jasmina) and Stately(jasmina) -> Flying(jasmina)\nforall x (Twinning(x) -> Flying(x))\n\nTensional(russell)\n\nFlying(russell) and forall x (Flying(x) -> Tensional(x)) -> therefore Tensional(russell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Virgie is cisalpine. Virgie is permutable. Spud is copesetic. Spud is ungarbed. Spud is permutable. Derby is permutable. Galina is changeful. All ungarbed people are unsaid. Red people are unsaid. Blue people are ungarbed. Red, cisalpine people are copesetic. Blue, copesetic people are cisalpine. If someone is permutable then they are changeful. If Derby is changeful and Derby is cisalpine then Derby is permutable. Big people are permutable. Spud is not unsaid.", "logic": "\nCisalpine(virgie)\nPermutable(virgie)\nCopesetic(spud)\nUngarbed(spud)\nPermutable(spud)\nPermutable(derby)\nChangeful(galina)\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) and Cisalpine(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) and Copesetic(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Permutable(x) -> Changeful(x))\nChangeful(derby) and Cisalpine(derby) -> Permutable(derby)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Permutable(x))\n\nnot Unsaid(spud)\n\nUngarbed(spud) and forall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Unsaid(x)) -> therefore Unsaid(spud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Barbie is predictive. Barbie is fallible. Norm is immodest. Norm is sulfurous. Norm is fallible. Sharai is fallible. Adriane is cubelike. All sulfurous people are obligatory. Red people are obligatory. Blue people are sulfurous. Red, predictive people are immodest. Blue, immodest people are predictive. If someone is fallible then they are cubelike. If Sharai is cubelike and Sharai is predictive then Sharai is fallible. Big people are fallible. Adriane is sulfurous.", "logic": "\nPredictive(barbie)\nFallible(barbie)\nImmodest(norm)\nSulfurous(norm)\nFallible(norm)\nFallible(sharai)\nCubelike(adriane)\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Obligatory(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) -> Obligatory(x))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) -> Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) and Predictive(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Obligatory(x) and Immodest(x) -> Predictive(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nCubelike(sharai) and Predictive(sharai) -> Fallible(sharai)\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Fallible(x))\n\nSulfurous(adriane)\n\nCubelike(adriane) and forall x (Cubelike(x) -> Obligatory(x)) -> therefore Obligatory(adriane) Obligatory(adriane) and forall x (Obligatory(x) -> Sulfurous(x)) -> therefore Sulfurous(adriane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Thomasina is credible. Thomasina is reticulate. Nannie is hypotonic. Nannie is backhanded. Nannie is reticulate. Veronique is reticulate. Kirbee is allopathic. All backhanded people are answering. Red people are answering. Blue people are backhanded. Red, credible people are hypotonic. Blue, hypotonic people are credible. If someone is reticulate then they are allopathic. If Veronique is allopathic and Veronique is credible then Veronique is reticulate. Big people are reticulate. Veronique is not answering.", "logic": "\nCredible(thomasina)\nReticulate(thomasina)\nHypotonic(nannie)\nBackhanded(nannie)\nReticulate(nannie)\nReticulate(veronique)\nAllopathic(kirbee)\nforall x (Backhanded(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Credible(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) and Hypotonic(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Reticulate(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nAllopathic(veronique) and Credible(veronique) -> Reticulate(veronique)\nforall x (Hypotonic(x) -> Reticulate(x))\n\nnot Answering(veronique)\n\nReticulate(veronique) and forall x (Reticulate(x) -> Allopathic(x)) -> therefore Allopathic(veronique) Allopathic(veronique) and forall x (Allopathic(x) -> Answering(x)) -> therefore Answering(veronique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Bonnee is creamy. Bonnee is amnesic. Fatima is ghastly. Fatima is averse. Fatima is amnesic. Kathryne is amnesic. Joe is damning. All averse people are windburnt. Red people are windburnt. Blue people are averse. Red, creamy people are ghastly. Blue, ghastly people are creamy. If someone is amnesic then they are damning. If Kathryne is damning and Kathryne is creamy then Kathryne is amnesic. Big people are amnesic. Kathryne is averse.", "logic": "\nCreamy(bonnee)\nAmnesic(bonnee)\nGhastly(fatima)\nAverse(fatima)\nAmnesic(fatima)\nAmnesic(kathryne)\nDamning(joe)\nforall x (Averse(x) -> Windburnt(x))\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Windburnt(x))\nforall x (Windburnt(x) -> Averse(x))\nforall x (Damning(x) and Creamy(x) -> Ghastly(x))\nforall x (Windburnt(x) and Ghastly(x) -> Creamy(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Damning(x))\nDamning(kathryne) and Creamy(kathryne) -> Amnesic(kathryne)\nforall x (Ghastly(x) -> Amnesic(x))\n\nAverse(kathryne)\n\nAmnesic(kathryne) and forall x (Amnesic(x) -> Damning(x)) -> therefore Damning(kathryne) Damning(kathryne) and forall x (Damning(x) -> Windburnt(x)) -> therefore Windburnt(kathryne) Windburnt(kathryne) and forall x (Windburnt(x) -> Averse(x)) -> therefore Averse(kathryne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Catherin is paying. Catherin is adroit. Margalo is murmuring. Margalo is hardened. Margalo is adroit. Salem is adroit. Cora is amiss. All hardened people are paleozoic. Red people are paleozoic. Blue people are hardened. Red, paying people are murmuring. Blue, murmuring people are paying. If someone is adroit then they are amiss. If Salem is amiss and Salem is paying then Salem is adroit. Big people are adroit. Catherin is not hardened.", "logic": "\nPaying(catherin)\nAdroit(catherin)\nMurmuring(margalo)\nHardened(margalo)\nAdroit(margalo)\nAdroit(salem)\nAmiss(cora)\nforall x (Hardened(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) -> Hardened(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) and Paying(x) -> Murmuring(x))\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) and Murmuring(x) -> Paying(x))\nforall x (Adroit(x) -> Amiss(x))\nAmiss(salem) and Paying(salem) -> Adroit(salem)\nforall x (Murmuring(x) -> Adroit(x))\n\nnot Hardened(catherin)\n\nAdroit(catherin) and forall x (Adroit(x) -> Amiss(x)) -> therefore Amiss(catherin) Amiss(catherin) and forall x (Amiss(x) -> Paleozoic(x)) -> therefore Paleozoic(catherin) Paleozoic(catherin) and forall x (Paleozoic(x) -> Hardened(x)) -> therefore Hardened(catherin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Adey is nutritious. Adey is right. Margret is severable. Margret is sexed. Margret is right. Rutter is right. Morgen is unpledged. All sexed people are aliquot. Red people are aliquot. Blue people are sexed. Red, nutritious people are severable. Blue, severable people are nutritious. If someone is right then they are unpledged. If Rutter is unpledged and Rutter is nutritious then Rutter is right. Big people are right. Morgen is not nutritious.", "logic": "\nNutritious(adey)\nRight(adey)\nSeverable(margret)\nSexed(margret)\nRight(margret)\nRight(rutter)\nUnpledged(morgen)\nforall x (Sexed(x) -> Aliquot(x))\nforall x (Unpledged(x) -> Aliquot(x))\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Sexed(x))\nforall x (Unpledged(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Severable(x))\nforall x (Aliquot(x) and Severable(x) -> Nutritious(x))\nforall x (Right(x) -> Unpledged(x))\nUnpledged(rutter) and Nutritious(rutter) -> Right(rutter)\nforall x (Severable(x) -> Right(x))\n\nnot Nutritious(morgen)\n\nforall x (Aliquot(x) and Severable(x) -> Nutritious(x)) <- forall x (Unpledged(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Severable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Thatcher is pentatonic. Thatcher is temperate. Corny is composite. Corny is adsorbate. Corny is temperate. Lind is temperate. Roze is felonious. All adsorbate people are anesthetic. Red people are anesthetic. Blue people are adsorbate. Red, pentatonic people are composite. Blue, composite people are pentatonic. If someone is temperate then they are felonious. If Lind is felonious and Lind is pentatonic then Lind is temperate. Big people are temperate. Lind is composite.", "logic": "\nPentatonic(thatcher)\nTemperate(thatcher)\nComposite(corny)\nAdsorbate(corny)\nTemperate(corny)\nTemperate(lind)\nFelonious(roze)\nforall x (Adsorbate(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Adsorbate(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) and Pentatonic(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) and Composite(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Felonious(x))\nFelonious(lind) and Pentatonic(lind) -> Temperate(lind)\nforall x (Composite(x) -> Temperate(x))\n\nComposite(lind)\n\nforall x (Felonious(x) and Pentatonic(x) -> Composite(x)) <- forall x (Anesthetic(x) and Composite(x) -> Pentatonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Alena is barricaded. Alena is duteous. Nero is unstylish. Nero is popular. Nero is duteous. Cam is duteous. Rina is decreasing. All popular people are phrenic. Red people are phrenic. Blue people are popular. Red, barricaded people are unstylish. Blue, unstylish people are barricaded. If someone is duteous then they are decreasing. If Cam is decreasing and Cam is barricaded then Cam is duteous. Big people are duteous. Rina is not duteous.", "logic": "\nBarricaded(alena)\nDuteous(alena)\nUnstylish(nero)\nPopular(nero)\nDuteous(nero)\nDuteous(cam)\nDecreasing(rina)\nforall x (Popular(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Decreasing(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Phrenic(x) -> Popular(x))\nforall x (Decreasing(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Phrenic(x) and Unstylish(x) -> Barricaded(x))\nforall x (Duteous(x) -> Decreasing(x))\nDecreasing(cam) and Barricaded(cam) -> Duteous(cam)\nforall x (Unstylish(x) -> Duteous(x))\n\nnot Duteous(rina)\n\nforall x (Unstylish(x) -> Duteous(x)) <- forall x (Decreasing(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Unstylish(x)) <- forall x (Phrenic(x) and Unstylish(x) -> Barricaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Susanna is grungy. Susanna is swampy. Baldwin is devout. Baldwin is propitious. Baldwin is swampy. Gisela is swampy. Lucienne is greased. All propitious people are tongued. Red people are tongued. Blue people are propitious. Red, grungy people are devout. Blue, devout people are grungy. If someone is swampy then they are greased. If Gisela is greased and Gisela is grungy then Gisela is swampy. Big people are swampy. Gisela is grungy.", "logic": "\nGrungy(susanna)\nSwampy(susanna)\nDevout(baldwin)\nPropitious(baldwin)\nSwampy(baldwin)\nSwampy(gisela)\nGreased(lucienne)\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Tongued(x))\nforall x (Greased(x) -> Tongued(x))\nforall x (Tongued(x) -> Propitious(x))\nforall x (Greased(x) and Grungy(x) -> Devout(x))\nforall x (Tongued(x) and Devout(x) -> Grungy(x))\nforall x (Swampy(x) -> Greased(x))\nGreased(gisela) and Grungy(gisela) -> Swampy(gisela)\nforall x (Devout(x) -> Swampy(x))\n\nGrungy(gisela)\n\nforall x (Tongued(x) and Devout(x) -> Grungy(x)) <- forall x (Greased(x) and Grungy(x) -> Devout(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Berchtold is unrewarded. Berchtold is nucleated. Kesley is magyar. Kesley is invincible. Kesley is nucleated. Miguelita is nucleated. Larry is argentine. All invincible people are amygdaline. Red people are amygdaline. Blue people are invincible. Red, unrewarded people are magyar. Blue, magyar people are unrewarded. If someone is nucleated then they are argentine. If Miguelita is argentine and Miguelita is unrewarded then Miguelita is nucleated. Big people are nucleated. Larry is not kind.", "logic": "\nUnrewarded(berchtold)\nNucleated(berchtold)\nMagyar(kesley)\nInvincible(kesley)\nNucleated(kesley)\nNucleated(miguelita)\nArgentine(larry)\nforall x (Invincible(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\nforall x (Argentine(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\nforall x (Amygdaline(x) -> Invincible(x))\nforall x (Argentine(x) and Unrewarded(x) -> Magyar(x))\nforall x (Amygdaline(x) and Magyar(x) -> Unrewarded(x))\nforall x (Nucleated(x) -> Argentine(x))\nArgentine(miguelita) and Unrewarded(miguelita) -> Nucleated(miguelita)\nforall x (Magyar(x) -> Nucleated(x))\n\nnot Kind(larry)\n\nnot Kind(larry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Belinda is rigged. Belinda is flyaway. Lilllie is sanitary. Lilllie is wobbly. Lilllie is flyaway. Muffin is flyaway. Tedie is afoul. All wobbly people are estrogenic. Red people are estrogenic. Blue people are wobbly. Red, rigged people are sanitary. Blue, sanitary people are rigged. If someone is flyaway then they are afoul. If Muffin is afoul and Muffin is rigged then Muffin is flyaway. Big people are flyaway. Lilllie is kind.", "logic": "\nRigged(belinda)\nFlyaway(belinda)\nSanitary(lilllie)\nWobbly(lilllie)\nFlyaway(lilllie)\nFlyaway(muffin)\nAfoul(tedie)\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Estrogenic(x) -> Wobbly(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Rigged(x) -> Sanitary(x))\nforall x (Estrogenic(x) and Sanitary(x) -> Rigged(x))\nforall x (Flyaway(x) -> Afoul(x))\nAfoul(muffin) and Rigged(muffin) -> Flyaway(muffin)\nforall x (Sanitary(x) -> Flyaway(x))\n\nKind(lilllie)\n\nKind(lilllie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Eli is sprigged. Eli is downtown. Osmund is principled. Osmund is unaffected. Osmund is downtown. Betta is downtown. Rici is thoriated. All unaffected people are scurrilous. Red people are scurrilous. Blue people are unaffected. Red, sprigged people are principled. Blue, principled people are sprigged. If someone is downtown then they are thoriated. If Betta is thoriated and Betta is sprigged then Betta is downtown. Big people are downtown. Eli is not kind.", "logic": "\nSprigged(eli)\nDowntown(eli)\nPrincipled(osmund)\nUnaffected(osmund)\nDowntown(osmund)\nDowntown(betta)\nThoriated(rici)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Thoriated(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Principled(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) and Principled(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nThoriated(betta) and Sprigged(betta) -> Downtown(betta)\nforall x (Principled(x) -> Downtown(x))\n\nnot Kind(eli)\n\nnot Kind(eli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Evvie is fitter. Evvie is pulmonic. Agnes is serene. Agnes is clxx. Agnes is pulmonic. Gav is pulmonic. Phillipp is frightened. All clxx people are inducive. Red people are inducive. Blue people are clxx. Red, fitter people are serene. Blue, serene people are fitter. If someone is pulmonic then they are frightened. If Gav is frightened and Gav is fitter then Gav is pulmonic. Big people are pulmonic. Gav is kind.", "logic": "\nFitter(evvie)\nPulmonic(evvie)\nSerene(agnes)\nClxx(agnes)\nPulmonic(agnes)\nPulmonic(gav)\nFrightened(phillipp)\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Frightened(x) and Fitter(x) -> Serene(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) and Serene(x) -> Fitter(x))\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) -> Frightened(x))\nFrightened(gav) and Fitter(gav) -> Pulmonic(gav)\nforall x (Serene(x) -> Pulmonic(x))\n\nKind(gav)\n\nKind(gav) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "The mika reallocate the malinda. The malinda collocate the mika. If the malinda wage the mika and the malinda collocate the mika then the mika wage the malinda. If something collocate the mika then it is defending. If something collocate the mika and the mika reallocate the malinda then it collocate the malinda. If something reallocate the mika then it is acidic. If something collocate the malinda then the malinda reallocate the mika. If something reallocate the mika and the mika wage the malinda then it wage the mika. The mika reallocate the malinda.", "logic": "\nReallocate(mika, malinda)\nCollocate(malinda, mika)\nWage(malinda, mika) and Collocate(malinda, mika) -> Wage(mika, malinda)\nforall x (Collocate(x, mika) -> Defending(x))\nforall x (Collocate(x, mika) and Reallocate(mika, malinda) -> Collocate(x, malinda))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, mika) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Collocate(x, malinda) -> Reallocate(malinda, mika))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, mika) and Wage(mika, malinda) -> Wage(x, mika))\n\nReallocate(mika, malinda)\n\ntherefore Reallocate(mika, malinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The corella reallocate the natalina. The natalina purse the corella. If the natalina spat the corella and the natalina purse the corella then the corella spat the natalina. If something purse the corella then it is saclike. If something purse the corella and the corella reallocate the natalina then it purse the natalina. If something reallocate the corella then it is hidrotic. If something purse the natalina then the natalina reallocate the corella. If something reallocate the corella and the corella spat the natalina then it spat the corella. The corella does not need the natalina.", "logic": "\nReallocate(corella, natalina)\nPurse(natalina, corella)\nSpat(natalina, corella) and Purse(natalina, corella) -> Spat(corella, natalina)\nforall x (Purse(x, corella) -> Saclike(x))\nforall x (Purse(x, corella) and Reallocate(corella, natalina) -> Purse(x, natalina))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, corella) -> Hidrotic(x))\nforall x (Purse(x, natalina) -> Reallocate(natalina, corella))\nforall x (Reallocate(x, corella) and Spat(corella, natalina) -> Spat(x, corella))\n\nnot Reallocate(corella, natalina)\n\ntherefore Reallocate(corella, natalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The hewet navigate the noel. The noel mention the hewet. If the noel sulphur the hewet and the noel mention the hewet then the hewet sulphur the noel. If something mention the hewet then it is ashamed. If something mention the hewet and the hewet navigate the noel then it mention the noel. If something navigate the hewet then it is unwritten. If something mention the noel then the noel navigate the hewet. If something navigate the hewet and the hewet sulphur the noel then it sulphur the hewet. The noel is ashamed.", "logic": "\nNavigate(hewet, noel)\nMention(noel, hewet)\nSulphur(noel, hewet) and Mention(noel, hewet) -> Sulphur(hewet, noel)\nforall x (Mention(x, hewet) -> Ashamed(x))\nforall x (Mention(x, hewet) and Navigate(hewet, noel) -> Mention(x, noel))\nforall x (Navigate(x, hewet) -> Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Mention(x, noel) -> Navigate(noel, hewet))\nforall x (Navigate(x, hewet) and Sulphur(hewet, noel) -> Sulphur(x, hewet))\n\nAshamed(noel)\n\nMention(noel, hewet) and forall x (Mention(x, hewet) -> Ashamed(x)) -> therefore Ashamed(noel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The englebert harshen the ken. The ken shriek the englebert. If the ken envenom the englebert and the ken shriek the englebert then the englebert envenom the ken. If something shriek the englebert then it is patronized. If something shriek the englebert and the englebert harshen the ken then it shriek the ken. If something harshen the englebert then it is mortified. If something shriek the ken then the ken harshen the englebert. If something harshen the englebert and the englebert envenom the ken then it envenom the englebert. The ken is not patronized.", "logic": "\nHarshen(englebert, ken)\nShriek(ken, englebert)\nEnvenom(ken, englebert) and Shriek(ken, englebert) -> Envenom(englebert, ken)\nforall x (Shriek(x, englebert) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Shriek(x, englebert) and Harshen(englebert, ken) -> Shriek(x, ken))\nforall x (Harshen(x, englebert) -> Mortified(x))\nforall x (Shriek(x, ken) -> Harshen(ken, englebert))\nforall x (Harshen(x, englebert) and Envenom(englebert, ken) -> Envenom(x, englebert))\n\nnot Patronized(ken)\n\nShriek(ken, englebert) and forall x (Shriek(x, englebert) -> Patronized(x)) -> therefore Patronized(ken)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The kirsten antedate the rodrick. The rodrick attribute the kirsten. If the rodrick intermit the kirsten and the rodrick attribute the kirsten then the kirsten intermit the rodrick. If something attribute the kirsten then it is expendable. If something attribute the kirsten and the kirsten antedate the rodrick then it attribute the rodrick. If something antedate the kirsten then it is counter. If something attribute the rodrick then the rodrick antedate the kirsten. If something antedate the kirsten and the kirsten intermit the rodrick then it intermit the kirsten. The rodrick antedate the kirsten.", "logic": "\nAntedate(kirsten, rodrick)\nAttribute(rodrick, kirsten)\nIntermit(rodrick, kirsten) and Attribute(rodrick, kirsten) -> Intermit(kirsten, rodrick)\nforall x (Attribute(x, kirsten) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Attribute(x, kirsten) and Antedate(kirsten, rodrick) -> Attribute(x, rodrick))\nforall x (Antedate(x, kirsten) -> Counter(x))\nforall x (Attribute(x, rodrick) -> Antedate(rodrick, kirsten))\nforall x (Antedate(x, kirsten) and Intermit(kirsten, rodrick) -> Intermit(x, kirsten))\n\nAntedate(rodrick, kirsten)\n\nAttribute(rodrick, kirsten) and Antedate(kirsten, rodrick) and forall x (Attribute(x, kirsten) and Antedate(kirsten, rodrick) -> Attribute(x, rodrick)) -> therefore Attribute(rodrick, rodrick) Attribute(rodrick, rodrick) and forall x (Attribute(x, rodrick) -> Antedate(rodrick, kirsten)) -> therefore Antedate(rodrick, kirsten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The jillana last the jef. The jef protrude the jillana. If the jef falcon the jillana and the jef protrude the jillana then the jillana falcon the jef. If something protrude the jillana then it is tragical. If something protrude the jillana and the jillana last the jef then it protrude the jef. If something last the jillana then it is rheologic. If something protrude the jef then the jef last the jillana. If something last the jillana and the jillana falcon the jef then it falcon the jillana. The jef does not need the jillana.", "logic": "\nLast(jillana, jef)\nProtrude(jef, jillana)\nFalcon(jef, jillana) and Protrude(jef, jillana) -> Falcon(jillana, jef)\nforall x (Protrude(x, jillana) -> Tragical(x))\nforall x (Protrude(x, jillana) and Last(jillana, jef) -> Protrude(x, jef))\nforall x (Last(x, jillana) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Protrude(x, jef) -> Last(jef, jillana))\nforall x (Last(x, jillana) and Falcon(jillana, jef) -> Falcon(x, jillana))\n\nnot Last(jef, jillana)\n\nProtrude(jef, jillana) and Last(jillana, jef) and forall x (Protrude(x, jillana) and Last(jillana, jef) -> Protrude(x, jef)) -> therefore Protrude(jef, jef) Protrude(jef, jef) and forall x (Protrude(x, jef) -> Last(jef, jillana)) -> therefore Last(jef, jillana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The esteban major the vernice. The vernice groan the esteban. If the vernice beep the esteban and the vernice groan the esteban then the esteban beep the vernice. If something groan the esteban then it is thirsty. If something groan the esteban and the esteban major the vernice then it groan the vernice. If something major the esteban then it is enhanced. If something groan the vernice then the vernice major the esteban. If something major the esteban and the esteban beep the vernice then it beep the esteban. The vernice is enhanced.", "logic": "\nMajor(esteban, vernice)\nGroan(vernice, esteban)\nBeep(vernice, esteban) and Groan(vernice, esteban) -> Beep(esteban, vernice)\nforall x (Groan(x, esteban) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Groan(x, esteban) and Major(esteban, vernice) -> Groan(x, vernice))\nforall x (Major(x, esteban) -> Enhanced(x))\nforall x (Groan(x, vernice) -> Major(vernice, esteban))\nforall x (Major(x, esteban) and Beep(esteban, vernice) -> Beep(x, esteban))\n\nEnhanced(vernice)\n\nGroan(vernice, esteban) and Major(esteban, vernice) and forall x (Groan(x, esteban) and Major(esteban, vernice) -> Groan(x, vernice)) -> therefore Groan(vernice, vernice) Groan(vernice, vernice) and forall x (Groan(x, vernice) -> Major(vernice, esteban)) -> therefore Major(vernice, esteban) Major(vernice, esteban) and forall x (Major(x, esteban) -> Enhanced(x)) -> therefore Enhanced(vernice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The pablo litter the albrecht. The albrecht caution the pablo. If the albrecht prologuize the pablo and the albrecht caution the pablo then the pablo prologuize the albrecht. If something caution the pablo then it is hebridean. If something caution the pablo and the pablo litter the albrecht then it caution the albrecht. If something litter the pablo then it is invertible. If something caution the albrecht then the albrecht litter the pablo. If something litter the pablo and the pablo prologuize the albrecht then it prologuize the pablo. The albrecht is not invertible.", "logic": "\nLitter(pablo, albrecht)\nCaution(albrecht, pablo)\nProloguize(albrecht, pablo) and Caution(albrecht, pablo) -> Prologuize(pablo, albrecht)\nforall x (Caution(x, pablo) -> Hebridean(x))\nforall x (Caution(x, pablo) and Litter(pablo, albrecht) -> Caution(x, albrecht))\nforall x (Litter(x, pablo) -> Invertible(x))\nforall x (Caution(x, albrecht) -> Litter(albrecht, pablo))\nforall x (Litter(x, pablo) and Prologuize(pablo, albrecht) -> Prologuize(x, pablo))\n\nnot Invertible(albrecht)\n\nCaution(albrecht, pablo) and Litter(pablo, albrecht) and forall x (Caution(x, pablo) and Litter(pablo, albrecht) -> Caution(x, albrecht)) -> therefore Caution(albrecht, albrecht) Caution(albrecht, albrecht) and forall x (Caution(x, albrecht) -> Litter(albrecht, pablo)) -> therefore Litter(albrecht, pablo) Litter(albrecht, pablo) and forall x (Litter(x, pablo) -> Invertible(x)) -> therefore Invertible(albrecht)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The claus prejudice the melvin. The melvin garotte the claus. If the melvin resettle the claus and the melvin garotte the claus then the claus resettle the melvin. If something garotte the claus then it is elegant. If something garotte the claus and the claus prejudice the melvin then it garotte the melvin. If something prejudice the claus then it is rimless. If something garotte the melvin then the melvin prejudice the claus. If something prejudice the claus and the claus resettle the melvin then it resettle the claus. The claus does not eat the melvin.", "logic": "\nPrejudice(claus, melvin)\nGarotte(melvin, claus)\nResettle(melvin, claus) and Garotte(melvin, claus) -> Resettle(claus, melvin)\nforall x (Garotte(x, claus) -> Elegant(x))\nforall x (Garotte(x, claus) and Prejudice(claus, melvin) -> Garotte(x, melvin))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, claus) -> Rimless(x))\nforall x (Garotte(x, melvin) -> Prejudice(melvin, claus))\nforall x (Prejudice(x, claus) and Resettle(claus, melvin) -> Resettle(x, claus))\n\nnot Resettle(claus, melvin)\n\nResettle(melvin, claus) and Garotte(melvin, claus) -> Resettle(claus, melvin) <- forall x (Prejudice(x, claus) and Resettle(claus, melvin) -> Resettle(x, claus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The evangelia limber the dulsea. The dulsea channelise the evangelia. If the dulsea upbraid the evangelia and the dulsea channelise the evangelia then the evangelia upbraid the dulsea. If something channelise the evangelia then it is unmoving. If something channelise the evangelia and the evangelia limber the dulsea then it channelise the dulsea. If something limber the evangelia then it is budgetary. If something channelise the dulsea then the dulsea limber the evangelia. If something limber the evangelia and the evangelia upbraid the dulsea then it upbraid the evangelia. The dulsea upbraid the evangelia.", "logic": "\nLimber(evangelia, dulsea)\nChannelise(dulsea, evangelia)\nUpbraid(dulsea, evangelia) and Channelise(dulsea, evangelia) -> Upbraid(evangelia, dulsea)\nforall x (Channelise(x, evangelia) -> Unmoving(x))\nforall x (Channelise(x, evangelia) and Limber(evangelia, dulsea) -> Channelise(x, dulsea))\nforall x (Limber(x, evangelia) -> Budgetary(x))\nforall x (Channelise(x, dulsea) -> Limber(dulsea, evangelia))\nforall x (Limber(x, evangelia) and Upbraid(evangelia, dulsea) -> Upbraid(x, evangelia))\n\nUpbraid(dulsea, evangelia)\n\nforall x (Limber(x, evangelia) and Upbraid(evangelia, dulsea) -> Upbraid(x, evangelia)) <- Upbraid(dulsea, evangelia) and Channelise(dulsea, evangelia) -> Upbraid(evangelia, dulsea) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The townie remember the pammie. The pammie outsell the townie. If the pammie chortle the townie and the pammie outsell the townie then the townie chortle the pammie. If something outsell the townie then it is lucent. If something outsell the townie and the townie remember the pammie then it outsell the pammie. If something remember the townie then it is large. If something outsell the pammie then the pammie remember the townie. If something remember the townie and the townie chortle the pammie then it chortle the townie. The townie does not eat the townie.", "logic": "\nRemember(townie, pammie)\nOutsell(pammie, townie)\nChortle(pammie, townie) and Outsell(pammie, townie) -> Chortle(townie, pammie)\nforall x (Outsell(x, townie) -> Lucent(x))\nforall x (Outsell(x, townie) and Remember(townie, pammie) -> Outsell(x, pammie))\nforall x (Remember(x, townie) -> Large(x))\nforall x (Outsell(x, pammie) -> Remember(pammie, townie))\nforall x (Remember(x, townie) and Chortle(townie, pammie) -> Chortle(x, townie))\n\nnot Chortle(townie, townie)\n\nforall x (Remember(x, townie) and Chortle(townie, pammie) -> Chortle(x, townie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The bernadina baulk the lorry. The lorry disfavor the bernadina. If the lorry tower the bernadina and the lorry disfavor the bernadina then the bernadina tower the lorry. If something disfavor the bernadina then it is anomic. If something disfavor the bernadina and the bernadina baulk the lorry then it disfavor the lorry. If something baulk the bernadina then it is slipping. If something disfavor the lorry then the lorry baulk the bernadina. If something baulk the bernadina and the bernadina tower the lorry then it tower the bernadina. The bernadina disfavor the lorry.", "logic": "\nBaulk(bernadina, lorry)\nDisfavor(lorry, bernadina)\nTower(lorry, bernadina) and Disfavor(lorry, bernadina) -> Tower(bernadina, lorry)\nforall x (Disfavor(x, bernadina) -> Anomic(x))\nforall x (Disfavor(x, bernadina) and Baulk(bernadina, lorry) -> Disfavor(x, lorry))\nforall x (Baulk(x, bernadina) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Disfavor(x, lorry) -> Baulk(lorry, bernadina))\nforall x (Baulk(x, bernadina) and Tower(bernadina, lorry) -> Tower(x, bernadina))\n\nDisfavor(bernadina, lorry)\n\nforall x (Disfavor(x, bernadina) and Baulk(bernadina, lorry) -> Disfavor(x, lorry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The raymundo faze the aurore. The aurore prompt the raymundo. If the aurore bruise the raymundo and the aurore prompt the raymundo then the raymundo bruise the aurore. If something prompt the raymundo then it is nauseated. If something prompt the raymundo and the raymundo faze the aurore then it prompt the aurore. If something faze the raymundo then it is canny. If something prompt the aurore then the aurore faze the raymundo. If something faze the raymundo and the raymundo bruise the aurore then it bruise the raymundo. The aurore does not need the aurore.", "logic": "\nFaze(raymundo, aurore)\nPrompt(aurore, raymundo)\nBruise(aurore, raymundo) and Prompt(aurore, raymundo) -> Bruise(raymundo, aurore)\nforall x (Prompt(x, raymundo) -> Nauseated(x))\nforall x (Prompt(x, raymundo) and Faze(raymundo, aurore) -> Prompt(x, aurore))\nforall x (Faze(x, raymundo) -> Canny(x))\nforall x (Prompt(x, aurore) -> Faze(aurore, raymundo))\nforall x (Faze(x, raymundo) and Bruise(raymundo, aurore) -> Bruise(x, raymundo))\n\nnot Faze(aurore, aurore)\n\nnot Faze(aurore, aurore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The sherrie accede the sashenka. The sashenka postulate the sherrie. If the sashenka gird the sherrie and the sashenka postulate the sherrie then the sherrie gird the sashenka. If something postulate the sherrie then it is provisory. If something postulate the sherrie and the sherrie accede the sashenka then it postulate the sashenka. If something accede the sherrie then it is resupine. If something postulate the sashenka then the sashenka accede the sherrie. If something accede the sherrie and the sherrie gird the sashenka then it gird the sherrie. The sherrie is cold.", "logic": "\nAccede(sherrie, sashenka)\nPostulate(sashenka, sherrie)\nGird(sashenka, sherrie) and Postulate(sashenka, sherrie) -> Gird(sherrie, sashenka)\nforall x (Postulate(x, sherrie) -> Provisory(x))\nforall x (Postulate(x, sherrie) and Accede(sherrie, sashenka) -> Postulate(x, sashenka))\nforall x (Accede(x, sherrie) -> Resupine(x))\nforall x (Postulate(x, sashenka) -> Accede(sashenka, sherrie))\nforall x (Accede(x, sherrie) and Gird(sherrie, sashenka) -> Gird(x, sherrie))\n\nCold(sherrie)\n\nCold(sherrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The jennifer crew the phyllis. The phyllis telescope the jennifer. If the phyllis razz the jennifer and the phyllis telescope the jennifer then the jennifer razz the phyllis. If something telescope the jennifer then it is odious. If something telescope the jennifer and the jennifer crew the phyllis then it telescope the phyllis. If something crew the jennifer then it is cyanophyte. If something telescope the phyllis then the phyllis crew the jennifer. If something crew the jennifer and the jennifer razz the phyllis then it razz the jennifer. The phyllis is not blue.", "logic": "\nCrew(jennifer, phyllis)\nTelescope(phyllis, jennifer)\nRazz(phyllis, jennifer) and Telescope(phyllis, jennifer) -> Razz(jennifer, phyllis)\nforall x (Telescope(x, jennifer) -> Odious(x))\nforall x (Telescope(x, jennifer) and Crew(jennifer, phyllis) -> Telescope(x, phyllis))\nforall x (Crew(x, jennifer) -> Cyanophyte(x))\nforall x (Telescope(x, phyllis) -> Crew(phyllis, jennifer))\nforall x (Crew(x, jennifer) and Razz(jennifer, phyllis) -> Razz(x, jennifer))\n\nnot Blue(phyllis)\n\nnot Blue(phyllis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The kalindi cure the mair. The mair bombilate the kalindi. If the mair rehash the kalindi and the mair bombilate the kalindi then the kalindi rehash the mair. If something bombilate the kalindi then it is gangrenous. If something bombilate the kalindi and the kalindi cure the mair then it bombilate the mair. If something cure the kalindi then it is rightmost. If something bombilate the mair then the mair cure the kalindi. If something cure the kalindi and the kalindi rehash the mair then it rehash the kalindi. The kalindi is kind.", "logic": "\nCure(kalindi, mair)\nBombilate(mair, kalindi)\nRehash(mair, kalindi) and Bombilate(mair, kalindi) -> Rehash(kalindi, mair)\nforall x (Bombilate(x, kalindi) -> Gangrenous(x))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, kalindi) and Cure(kalindi, mair) -> Bombilate(x, mair))\nforall x (Cure(x, kalindi) -> Rightmost(x))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, mair) -> Cure(mair, kalindi))\nforall x (Cure(x, kalindi) and Rehash(kalindi, mair) -> Rehash(x, kalindi))\n\nKind(kalindi)\n\nKind(kalindi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The muriel is not precise. The ivor misspell the muriel. The kira is tuberous. The ammamaria soften the ivor. If the ivor misspell the muriel and the ivor soften the muriel then the muriel soften the ivor. If the ammamaria does not like the muriel then the ammamaria soften the kira. If someone is penumbral and they do not see the ammamaria then they need the muriel. If someone is umbellar then they see the muriel. If the ammamaria does not like the kira then the kira does not need the ivor. If someone misspell the muriel then they are umbellar. If the kira soften the ammamaria then the ammamaria does not like the ivor. If the kira is not umbellar and the kira does not need the muriel then the muriel soften the kira. The ivor misspell the muriel.", "logic": "\nnot Precise(muriel)\nMisspell(ivor, muriel)\nTuberous(kira)\nSoften(ammamaria, ivor)\nMisspell(ivor, muriel) and Soften(ivor, muriel) -> Soften(muriel, ivor)\nnot Misspell(ammamaria, muriel) -> Soften(ammamaria, kira)\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and not Soften(x, ammamaria) -> Ambush(x, muriel))\nforall x (Umbellar(x) -> Soften(x, muriel))\nnot Misspell(ammamaria, kira) -> not Ambush(kira, ivor)\nforall x (Misspell(x, muriel) -> Umbellar(x))\nSoften(kira, ammamaria) -> not Misspell(ammamaria, ivor)\nnot Umbellar(kira) and not Ambush(kira, muriel) -> Soften(muriel, kira)\n\nMisspell(ivor, muriel)\n\ntherefore Misspell(ivor, muriel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The bart is not cypriot. The conan huckster the bart. The tull is necked. The sheena glow the conan. If the conan huckster the bart and the conan glow the bart then the bart glow the conan. If the sheena does not like the bart then the sheena glow the tull. If someone is edematous and they do not see the sheena then they need the bart. If someone is telltale then they see the bart. If the sheena does not like the tull then the tull does not need the conan. If someone huckster the bart then they are telltale. If the tull glow the sheena then the sheena does not like the conan. If the tull is not telltale and the tull does not need the bart then the bart glow the tull. The tull is not necked.", "logic": "\nnot Cypriot(bart)\nHuckster(conan, bart)\nNecked(tull)\nGlow(sheena, conan)\nHuckster(conan, bart) and Glow(conan, bart) -> Glow(bart, conan)\nnot Huckster(sheena, bart) -> Glow(sheena, tull)\nforall x (Edematous(x) and not Glow(x, sheena) -> Deny(x, bart))\nforall x (Telltale(x) -> Glow(x, bart))\nnot Huckster(sheena, tull) -> not Deny(tull, conan)\nforall x (Huckster(x, bart) -> Telltale(x))\nGlow(tull, sheena) -> not Huckster(sheena, conan)\nnot Telltale(tull) and not Deny(tull, bart) -> Glow(bart, tull)\n\nnot Necked(tull)\n\ntherefore Necked(tull)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The wilt is not upmarket. The danya improvize the wilt. The hadria is ruminant. The dewitt advocate the danya. If the danya improvize the wilt and the danya advocate the wilt then the wilt advocate the danya. If the dewitt does not like the wilt then the dewitt advocate the hadria. If someone is scrupulous and they do not see the dewitt then they need the wilt. If someone is unfriendly then they see the wilt. If the dewitt does not like the hadria then the hadria does not need the danya. If someone improvize the wilt then they are unfriendly. If the hadria advocate the dewitt then the dewitt does not like the danya. If the hadria is not unfriendly and the hadria does not need the wilt then the wilt advocate the hadria. The danya is unfriendly.", "logic": "\nnot Upmarket(wilt)\nImprovize(danya, wilt)\nRuminant(hadria)\nAdvocate(dewitt, danya)\nImprovize(danya, wilt) and Advocate(danya, wilt) -> Advocate(wilt, danya)\nnot Improvize(dewitt, wilt) -> Advocate(dewitt, hadria)\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and not Advocate(x, dewitt) -> Alternate(x, wilt))\nforall x (Unfriendly(x) -> Advocate(x, wilt))\nnot Improvize(dewitt, hadria) -> not Alternate(hadria, danya)\nforall x (Improvize(x, wilt) -> Unfriendly(x))\nAdvocate(hadria, dewitt) -> not Improvize(dewitt, danya)\nnot Unfriendly(hadria) and not Alternate(hadria, wilt) -> Advocate(wilt, hadria)\n\nUnfriendly(danya)\n\nImprovize(danya, wilt) and forall x (Improvize(x, wilt) -> Unfriendly(x)) -> therefore Unfriendly(danya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The ragnar is not eccrine. The adelina broaden the ragnar. The lacee is cultivated. The latashia displume the adelina. If the adelina broaden the ragnar and the adelina displume the ragnar then the ragnar displume the adelina. If the latashia does not like the ragnar then the latashia displume the lacee. If someone is xxxii and they do not see the latashia then they need the ragnar. If someone is unneurotic then they see the ragnar. If the latashia does not like the lacee then the lacee does not need the adelina. If someone broaden the ragnar then they are unneurotic. If the lacee displume the latashia then the latashia does not like the adelina. If the lacee is not unneurotic and the lacee does not need the ragnar then the ragnar displume the lacee. The adelina is not unneurotic.", "logic": "\nnot Eccrine(ragnar)\nBroaden(adelina, ragnar)\nCultivated(lacee)\nDisplume(latashia, adelina)\nBroaden(adelina, ragnar) and Displume(adelina, ragnar) -> Displume(ragnar, adelina)\nnot Broaden(latashia, ragnar) -> Displume(latashia, lacee)\nforall x (Xxxii(x) and not Displume(x, latashia) -> Please(x, ragnar))\nforall x (Unneurotic(x) -> Displume(x, ragnar))\nnot Broaden(latashia, lacee) -> not Please(lacee, adelina)\nforall x (Broaden(x, ragnar) -> Unneurotic(x))\nDisplume(lacee, latashia) -> not Broaden(latashia, adelina)\nnot Unneurotic(lacee) and not Please(lacee, ragnar) -> Displume(ragnar, lacee)\n\nnot Unneurotic(adelina)\n\nBroaden(adelina, ragnar) and forall x (Broaden(x, ragnar) -> Unneurotic(x)) -> therefore Unneurotic(adelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The romeo is not henpecked. The cindie suspend the romeo. The salvidor is chockful. The hendrick jawbone the cindie. If the cindie suspend the romeo and the cindie jawbone the romeo then the romeo jawbone the cindie. If the hendrick does not like the romeo then the hendrick jawbone the salvidor. If someone is midget and they do not see the hendrick then they need the romeo. If someone is regardful then they see the romeo. If the hendrick does not like the salvidor then the salvidor does not need the cindie. If someone suspend the romeo then they are regardful. If the salvidor jawbone the hendrick then the hendrick does not like the cindie. If the salvidor is not regardful and the salvidor does not need the romeo then the romeo jawbone the salvidor. The cindie jawbone the romeo.", "logic": "\nnot Henpecked(romeo)\nSuspend(cindie, romeo)\nChockful(salvidor)\nJawbone(hendrick, cindie)\nSuspend(cindie, romeo) and Jawbone(cindie, romeo) -> Jawbone(romeo, cindie)\nnot Suspend(hendrick, romeo) -> Jawbone(hendrick, salvidor)\nforall x (Midget(x) and not Jawbone(x, hendrick) -> Billet(x, romeo))\nforall x (Regardful(x) -> Jawbone(x, romeo))\nnot Suspend(hendrick, salvidor) -> not Billet(salvidor, cindie)\nforall x (Suspend(x, romeo) -> Regardful(x))\nJawbone(salvidor, hendrick) -> not Suspend(hendrick, cindie)\nnot Regardful(salvidor) and not Billet(salvidor, romeo) -> Jawbone(romeo, salvidor)\n\nJawbone(cindie, romeo)\n\nSuspend(cindie, romeo) and forall x (Suspend(x, romeo) -> Regardful(x)) -> therefore Regardful(cindie) Regardful(cindie) and forall x (Regardful(x) -> Jawbone(x, romeo)) -> therefore Jawbone(cindie, romeo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The analise is not nonbearing. The lydia combat the analise. The arline is unheeded. The lynnelle surf the lydia. If the lydia combat the analise and the lydia surf the analise then the analise surf the lydia. If the lynnelle does not like the analise then the lynnelle surf the arline. If someone is dysphoric and they do not see the lynnelle then they need the analise. If someone is pinkish then they see the analise. If the lynnelle does not like the arline then the arline does not need the lydia. If someone combat the analise then they are pinkish. If the arline surf the lynnelle then the lynnelle does not like the lydia. If the arline is not pinkish and the arline does not need the analise then the analise surf the arline. The lydia does not see the analise.", "logic": "\nnot Nonbearing(analise)\nCombat(lydia, analise)\nUnheeded(arline)\nSurf(lynnelle, lydia)\nCombat(lydia, analise) and Surf(lydia, analise) -> Surf(analise, lydia)\nnot Combat(lynnelle, analise) -> Surf(lynnelle, arline)\nforall x (Dysphoric(x) and not Surf(x, lynnelle) -> Snatch(x, analise))\nforall x (Pinkish(x) -> Surf(x, analise))\nnot Combat(lynnelle, arline) -> not Snatch(arline, lydia)\nforall x (Combat(x, analise) -> Pinkish(x))\nSurf(arline, lynnelle) -> not Combat(lynnelle, lydia)\nnot Pinkish(arline) and not Snatch(arline, analise) -> Surf(analise, arline)\n\nnot Surf(lydia, analise)\n\nCombat(lydia, analise) and forall x (Combat(x, analise) -> Pinkish(x)) -> therefore Pinkish(lydia) Pinkish(lydia) and forall x (Pinkish(x) -> Surf(x, analise)) -> therefore Surf(lydia, analise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The karry is not jumbo. The nils exposit the karry. The sheelah is delusive. The ardyce lust the nils. If the nils exposit the karry and the nils lust the karry then the karry lust the nils. If the ardyce does not like the karry then the ardyce lust the sheelah. If someone is pleural and they do not see the ardyce then they need the karry. If someone is aggressive then they see the karry. If the ardyce does not like the sheelah then the sheelah does not need the nils. If someone exposit the karry then they are aggressive. If the sheelah lust the ardyce then the ardyce does not like the nils. If the sheelah is not aggressive and the sheelah does not need the karry then the karry lust the sheelah. The karry lust the nils.", "logic": "\nnot Jumbo(karry)\nExposit(nils, karry)\nDelusive(sheelah)\nLust(ardyce, nils)\nExposit(nils, karry) and Lust(nils, karry) -> Lust(karry, nils)\nnot Exposit(ardyce, karry) -> Lust(ardyce, sheelah)\nforall x (Pleural(x) and not Lust(x, ardyce) -> Gauge(x, karry))\nforall x (Aggressive(x) -> Lust(x, karry))\nnot Exposit(ardyce, sheelah) -> not Gauge(sheelah, nils)\nforall x (Exposit(x, karry) -> Aggressive(x))\nLust(sheelah, ardyce) -> not Exposit(ardyce, nils)\nnot Aggressive(sheelah) and not Gauge(sheelah, karry) -> Lust(karry, sheelah)\n\nLust(karry, nils)\n\nExposit(nils, karry) and forall x (Exposit(x, karry) -> Aggressive(x)) -> therefore Aggressive(nils) Aggressive(nils) and forall x (Aggressive(x) -> Lust(x, karry)) -> therefore Lust(nils, karry) Exposit(nils, karry) and Lust(nils, karry) and Exposit(nils, karry) and Lust(nils, karry) -> Lust(karry, nils) -> therefore Lust(karry, nils)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The sybyl is not orwellian. The edgar dissipate the sybyl. The juline is satiny. The alissa subrogate the edgar. If the edgar dissipate the sybyl and the edgar subrogate the sybyl then the sybyl subrogate the edgar. If the alissa does not like the sybyl then the alissa subrogate the juline. If someone is plugged and they do not see the alissa then they need the sybyl. If someone is cruciform then they see the sybyl. If the alissa does not like the juline then the juline does not need the edgar. If someone dissipate the sybyl then they are cruciform. If the juline subrogate the alissa then the alissa does not like the edgar. If the juline is not cruciform and the juline does not need the sybyl then the sybyl subrogate the juline. The sybyl does not see the edgar.", "logic": "\nnot Orwellian(sybyl)\nDissipate(edgar, sybyl)\nSatiny(juline)\nSubrogate(alissa, edgar)\nDissipate(edgar, sybyl) and Subrogate(edgar, sybyl) -> Subrogate(sybyl, edgar)\nnot Dissipate(alissa, sybyl) -> Subrogate(alissa, juline)\nforall x (Plugged(x) and not Subrogate(x, alissa) -> Ranch(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Cruciform(x) -> Subrogate(x, sybyl))\nnot Dissipate(alissa, juline) -> not Ranch(juline, edgar)\nforall x (Dissipate(x, sybyl) -> Cruciform(x))\nSubrogate(juline, alissa) -> not Dissipate(alissa, edgar)\nnot Cruciform(juline) and not Ranch(juline, sybyl) -> Subrogate(sybyl, juline)\n\nnot Subrogate(sybyl, edgar)\n\nDissipate(edgar, sybyl) and forall x (Dissipate(x, sybyl) -> Cruciform(x)) -> therefore Cruciform(edgar) Cruciform(edgar) and forall x (Cruciform(x) -> Subrogate(x, sybyl)) -> therefore Subrogate(edgar, sybyl) Dissipate(edgar, sybyl) and Subrogate(edgar, sybyl) and Dissipate(edgar, sybyl) and Subrogate(edgar, sybyl) -> Subrogate(sybyl, edgar) -> therefore Subrogate(sybyl, edgar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The amalie is not factious. The chrissy charm the amalie. The andrus is apposite. The ravil heliograph the chrissy. If the chrissy charm the amalie and the chrissy heliograph the amalie then the amalie heliograph the chrissy. If the ravil does not like the amalie then the ravil heliograph the andrus. If someone is divinatory and they do not see the ravil then they need the amalie. If someone is desultory then they see the amalie. If the ravil does not like the andrus then the andrus does not need the chrissy. If someone charm the amalie then they are desultory. If the andrus heliograph the ravil then the ravil does not like the chrissy. If the andrus is not desultory and the andrus does not need the amalie then the amalie heliograph the andrus. The ravil does not need the amalie.", "logic": "\nnot Factious(amalie)\nCharm(chrissy, amalie)\nApposite(andrus)\nHeliograph(ravil, chrissy)\nCharm(chrissy, amalie) and Heliograph(chrissy, amalie) -> Heliograph(amalie, chrissy)\nnot Charm(ravil, amalie) -> Heliograph(ravil, andrus)\nforall x (Divinatory(x) and not Heliograph(x, ravil) -> Stack(x, amalie))\nforall x (Desultory(x) -> Heliograph(x, amalie))\nnot Charm(ravil, andrus) -> not Stack(andrus, chrissy)\nforall x (Charm(x, amalie) -> Desultory(x))\nHeliograph(andrus, ravil) -> not Charm(ravil, chrissy)\nnot Desultory(andrus) and not Stack(andrus, amalie) -> Heliograph(amalie, andrus)\n\nnot Stack(ravil, amalie)\n\nforall x (Divinatory(x) and not Heliograph(x, ravil) -> Stack(x, amalie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The tabbatha is not superfine. The madalyn enchant the tabbatha. The irwin is phonemic. The kevyn understate the madalyn. If the madalyn enchant the tabbatha and the madalyn understate the tabbatha then the tabbatha understate the madalyn. If the kevyn does not like the tabbatha then the kevyn understate the irwin. If someone is censorious and they do not see the kevyn then they need the tabbatha. If someone is crack then they see the tabbatha. If the kevyn does not like the irwin then the irwin does not need the madalyn. If someone enchant the tabbatha then they are crack. If the irwin understate the kevyn then the kevyn does not like the madalyn. If the irwin is not crack and the irwin does not need the tabbatha then the tabbatha understate the irwin. The irwin understate the tabbatha.", "logic": "\nnot Superfine(tabbatha)\nEnchant(madalyn, tabbatha)\nPhonemic(irwin)\nUnderstate(kevyn, madalyn)\nEnchant(madalyn, tabbatha) and Understate(madalyn, tabbatha) -> Understate(tabbatha, madalyn)\nnot Enchant(kevyn, tabbatha) -> Understate(kevyn, irwin)\nforall x (Censorious(x) and not Understate(x, kevyn) -> Gluttonize(x, tabbatha))\nforall x (Crack(x) -> Understate(x, tabbatha))\nnot Enchant(kevyn, irwin) -> not Gluttonize(irwin, madalyn)\nforall x (Enchant(x, tabbatha) -> Crack(x))\nUnderstate(irwin, kevyn) -> not Enchant(kevyn, madalyn)\nnot Crack(irwin) and not Gluttonize(irwin, tabbatha) -> Understate(tabbatha, irwin)\n\nUnderstate(irwin, tabbatha)\n\nforall x (Crack(x) -> Understate(x, tabbatha)) <- forall x (Enchant(x, tabbatha) -> Crack(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The cassondra is not lacrimal. The aleda burden the cassondra. The cody is downcast. The bessy spare the aleda. If the aleda burden the cassondra and the aleda spare the cassondra then the cassondra spare the aleda. If the bessy does not like the cassondra then the bessy spare the cody. If someone is tuscan and they do not see the bessy then they need the cassondra. If someone is antebellum then they see the cassondra. If the bessy does not like the cody then the cody does not need the aleda. If someone burden the cassondra then they are antebellum. If the cody spare the bessy then the bessy does not like the aleda. If the cody is not antebellum and the cody does not need the cassondra then the cassondra spare the cody. The cassondra does not need the cassondra.", "logic": "\nnot Lacrimal(cassondra)\nBurden(aleda, cassondra)\nDowncast(cody)\nSpare(bessy, aleda)\nBurden(aleda, cassondra) and Spare(aleda, cassondra) -> Spare(cassondra, aleda)\nnot Burden(bessy, cassondra) -> Spare(bessy, cody)\nforall x (Tuscan(x) and not Spare(x, bessy) -> Prohibit(x, cassondra))\nforall x (Antebellum(x) -> Spare(x, cassondra))\nnot Burden(bessy, cody) -> not Prohibit(cody, aleda)\nforall x (Burden(x, cassondra) -> Antebellum(x))\nSpare(cody, bessy) -> not Burden(bessy, aleda)\nnot Antebellum(cody) and not Prohibit(cody, cassondra) -> Spare(cassondra, cody)\n\nnot Prohibit(cassondra, cassondra)\n\nforall x (Tuscan(x) and not Spare(x, bessy) -> Prohibit(x, cassondra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The fyodor is not beginning. The gino blister the fyodor. The sybyl is collegial. The adriaens mend the gino. If the gino blister the fyodor and the gino mend the fyodor then the fyodor mend the gino. If the adriaens does not like the fyodor then the adriaens mend the sybyl. If someone is unoiled and they do not see the adriaens then they need the fyodor. If someone is homespun then they see the fyodor. If the adriaens does not like the sybyl then the sybyl does not need the gino. If someone blister the fyodor then they are homespun. If the sybyl mend the adriaens then the adriaens does not like the gino. If the sybyl is not homespun and the sybyl does not need the fyodor then the fyodor mend the sybyl. The gino carburize the fyodor.", "logic": "\nnot Beginning(fyodor)\nBlister(gino, fyodor)\nCollegial(sybyl)\nMend(adriaens, gino)\nBlister(gino, fyodor) and Mend(gino, fyodor) -> Mend(fyodor, gino)\nnot Blister(adriaens, fyodor) -> Mend(adriaens, sybyl)\nforall x (Unoiled(x) and not Mend(x, adriaens) -> Carburize(x, fyodor))\nforall x (Homespun(x) -> Mend(x, fyodor))\nnot Blister(adriaens, sybyl) -> not Carburize(sybyl, gino)\nforall x (Blister(x, fyodor) -> Homespun(x))\nMend(sybyl, adriaens) -> not Blister(adriaens, gino)\nnot Homespun(sybyl) and not Carburize(sybyl, fyodor) -> Mend(fyodor, sybyl)\n\nCarburize(gino, fyodor)\n\nforall x (Unoiled(x) and not Mend(x, adriaens) -> Carburize(x, fyodor)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The avie is not prenatal. The claire socialize the avie. The roz is frowning. The esmaria skirt the claire. If the claire socialize the avie and the claire skirt the avie then the avie skirt the claire. If the esmaria does not like the avie then the esmaria skirt the roz. If someone is cacophonic and they do not see the esmaria then they need the avie. If someone is contracted then they see the avie. If the esmaria does not like the roz then the roz does not need the claire. If someone socialize the avie then they are contracted. If the roz skirt the esmaria then the esmaria does not like the claire. If the roz is not contracted and the roz does not need the avie then the avie skirt the roz. The avie does not need the claire.", "logic": "\nnot Prenatal(avie)\nSocialize(claire, avie)\nFrowning(roz)\nSkirt(esmaria, claire)\nSocialize(claire, avie) and Skirt(claire, avie) -> Skirt(avie, claire)\nnot Socialize(esmaria, avie) -> Skirt(esmaria, roz)\nforall x (Cacophonic(x) and not Skirt(x, esmaria) -> Schmoose(x, avie))\nforall x (Contracted(x) -> Skirt(x, avie))\nnot Socialize(esmaria, roz) -> not Schmoose(roz, claire)\nforall x (Socialize(x, avie) -> Contracted(x))\nSkirt(roz, esmaria) -> not Socialize(esmaria, claire)\nnot Contracted(roz) and not Schmoose(roz, avie) -> Skirt(avie, roz)\n\nnot Schmoose(avie, claire)\n\nnot Schmoose(avie, claire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The nikos is not blastular. The emmie fricassee the nikos. The web is anamnestic. The annabell surge the emmie. If the emmie fricassee the nikos and the emmie surge the nikos then the nikos surge the emmie. If the annabell does not like the nikos then the annabell surge the web. If someone is candied and they do not see the annabell then they need the nikos. If someone is isomeric then they see the nikos. If the annabell does not like the web then the web does not need the emmie. If someone fricassee the nikos then they are isomeric. If the web surge the annabell then the annabell does not like the emmie. If the web is not isomeric and the web does not need the nikos then the nikos surge the web. The web didder the annabell.", "logic": "\nnot Blastular(nikos)\nFricassee(emmie, nikos)\nAnamnestic(web)\nSurge(annabell, emmie)\nFricassee(emmie, nikos) and Surge(emmie, nikos) -> Surge(nikos, emmie)\nnot Fricassee(annabell, nikos) -> Surge(annabell, web)\nforall x (Candied(x) and not Surge(x, annabell) -> Didder(x, nikos))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Surge(x, nikos))\nnot Fricassee(annabell, web) -> not Didder(web, emmie)\nforall x (Fricassee(x, nikos) -> Isomeric(x))\nSurge(web, annabell) -> not Fricassee(annabell, emmie)\nnot Isomeric(web) and not Didder(web, nikos) -> Surge(nikos, web)\n\nDidder(web, annabell)\n\nDidder(web, annabell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The gabbi is not braggart. The thane steamer the gabbi. The teodoro is rayless. The aili test the thane. If the thane steamer the gabbi and the thane test the gabbi then the gabbi test the thane. If the aili does not like the gabbi then the aili test the teodoro. If someone is unhearable and they do not see the aili then they need the gabbi. If someone is moist then they see the gabbi. If the aili does not like the teodoro then the teodoro does not need the thane. If someone steamer the gabbi then they are moist. If the teodoro test the aili then the aili does not like the thane. If the teodoro is not moist and the teodoro does not need the gabbi then the gabbi test the teodoro. The teodoro does not need the thane.", "logic": "\nnot Braggart(gabbi)\nSteamer(thane, gabbi)\nRayless(teodoro)\nTest(aili, thane)\nSteamer(thane, gabbi) and Test(thane, gabbi) -> Test(gabbi, thane)\nnot Steamer(aili, gabbi) -> Test(aili, teodoro)\nforall x (Unhearable(x) and not Test(x, aili) -> Devitrify(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Moist(x) -> Test(x, gabbi))\nnot Steamer(aili, teodoro) -> not Devitrify(teodoro, thane)\nforall x (Steamer(x, gabbi) -> Moist(x))\nTest(teodoro, aili) -> not Steamer(aili, thane)\nnot Moist(teodoro) and not Devitrify(teodoro, gabbi) -> Test(gabbi, teodoro)\n\nnot Devitrify(teodoro, thane)\n\nnot Devitrify(teodoro, thane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The carolina is not uncoated. The philipa unstuff the carolina. The leon is reliable. The mary raft the philipa. If the philipa unstuff the carolina and the philipa raft the carolina then the carolina raft the philipa. If the mary does not like the carolina then the mary raft the leon. If someone is antheral and they do not see the mary then they need the carolina. If someone is amok then they see the carolina. If the mary does not like the leon then the leon does not need the philipa. If someone unstuff the carolina then they are amok. If the leon raft the mary then the mary does not like the philipa. If the leon is not amok and the leon does not need the carolina then the carolina raft the leon. The leon raft the philipa.", "logic": "\nnot Uncoated(carolina)\nUnstuff(philipa, carolina)\nReliable(leon)\nRaft(mary, philipa)\nUnstuff(philipa, carolina) and Raft(philipa, carolina) -> Raft(carolina, philipa)\nnot Unstuff(mary, carolina) -> Raft(mary, leon)\nforall x (Antheral(x) and not Raft(x, mary) -> Obscure(x, carolina))\nforall x (Amok(x) -> Raft(x, carolina))\nnot Unstuff(mary, leon) -> not Obscure(leon, philipa)\nforall x (Unstuff(x, carolina) -> Amok(x))\nRaft(leon, mary) -> not Unstuff(mary, philipa)\nnot Amok(leon) and not Obscure(leon, carolina) -> Raft(carolina, leon)\n\nRaft(leon, philipa)\n\nRaft(leon, philipa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The roanna is pregnant. The roanna is unpictured. The roanna reorder the simeon. The roanna bisect the simeon. The simeon louden the roanna. The simeon is pregnant. The simeon is shipboard. The simeon is merited. The simeon is unpictured. The simeon is involved. If something louden the simeon and it is unpictured then it bisect the roanna. If something is shipboard then it louden the simeon. If the roanna bisect the simeon then the roanna reorder the simeon. If something bisect the roanna then the roanna louden the simeon. If something bisect the simeon then it bisect the roanna. If something reorder the roanna then it bisect the simeon. If the roanna louden the simeon and the roanna reorder the simeon then the roanna is merited. If something bisect the roanna then it bisect the simeon. The roanna bisect the simeon.", "logic": "\nPregnant(roanna)\nUnpictured(roanna)\nReorder(roanna, simeon)\nBisect(roanna, simeon)\nLouden(simeon, roanna)\nPregnant(simeon)\nShipboard(simeon)\nMerited(simeon)\nUnpictured(simeon)\nInvolved(simeon)\nforall x (Louden(x, simeon) and Unpictured(x) -> Bisect(x, roanna))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) -> Louden(x, simeon))\nBisect(roanna, simeon) -> Reorder(roanna, simeon)\nforall x (Bisect(x, roanna) -> Louden(roanna, simeon))\nforall x (Bisect(x, simeon) -> Bisect(x, roanna))\nforall x (Reorder(x, roanna) -> Bisect(x, simeon))\nLouden(roanna, simeon) and Reorder(roanna, simeon) -> Merited(roanna)\nforall x (Bisect(x, roanna) -> Bisect(x, simeon))\n\nBisect(roanna, simeon)\n\ntherefore Bisect(roanna, simeon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The perrine is naiant. The perrine is leafed. The perrine chloroform the delphine. The perrine yell the delphine. The delphine goofproof the perrine. The delphine is naiant. The delphine is snowbound. The delphine is improvised. The delphine is leafed. The delphine is disgustful. If something goofproof the delphine and it is leafed then it yell the perrine. If something is snowbound then it goofproof the delphine. If the perrine yell the delphine then the perrine chloroform the delphine. If something yell the perrine then the perrine goofproof the delphine. If something yell the delphine then it yell the perrine. If something chloroform the perrine then it yell the delphine. If the perrine goofproof the delphine and the perrine chloroform the delphine then the perrine is improvised. If something yell the perrine then it yell the delphine. The delphine is not snowbound.", "logic": "\nNaiant(perrine)\nLeafed(perrine)\nChloroform(perrine, delphine)\nYell(perrine, delphine)\nGoofproof(delphine, perrine)\nNaiant(delphine)\nSnowbound(delphine)\nImprovised(delphine)\nLeafed(delphine)\nDisgustful(delphine)\nforall x (Goofproof(x, delphine) and Leafed(x) -> Yell(x, perrine))\nforall x (Snowbound(x) -> Goofproof(x, delphine))\nYell(perrine, delphine) -> Chloroform(perrine, delphine)\nforall x (Yell(x, perrine) -> Goofproof(perrine, delphine))\nforall x (Yell(x, delphine) -> Yell(x, perrine))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, perrine) -> Yell(x, delphine))\nGoofproof(perrine, delphine) and Chloroform(perrine, delphine) -> Improvised(perrine)\nforall x (Yell(x, perrine) -> Yell(x, delphine))\n\nnot Snowbound(delphine)\n\ntherefore Snowbound(delphine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The cybel is adept. The cybel is gormless. The cybel plumb the gerti. The cybel salvage the gerti. The gerti acquaint the cybel. The gerti is adept. The gerti is inboard. The gerti is retained. The gerti is gormless. The gerti is pending. If something acquaint the gerti and it is gormless then it salvage the cybel. If something is inboard then it acquaint the gerti. If the cybel salvage the gerti then the cybel plumb the gerti. If something salvage the cybel then the cybel acquaint the gerti. If something salvage the gerti then it salvage the cybel. If something plumb the cybel then it salvage the gerti. If the cybel acquaint the gerti and the cybel plumb the gerti then the cybel is retained. If something salvage the cybel then it salvage the gerti. The cybel salvage the cybel.", "logic": "\nAdept(cybel)\nGormless(cybel)\nPlumb(cybel, gerti)\nSalvage(cybel, gerti)\nAcquaint(gerti, cybel)\nAdept(gerti)\nInboard(gerti)\nRetained(gerti)\nGormless(gerti)\nPending(gerti)\nforall x (Acquaint(x, gerti) and Gormless(x) -> Salvage(x, cybel))\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> Acquaint(x, gerti))\nSalvage(cybel, gerti) -> Plumb(cybel, gerti)\nforall x (Salvage(x, cybel) -> Acquaint(cybel, gerti))\nforall x (Salvage(x, gerti) -> Salvage(x, cybel))\nforall x (Plumb(x, cybel) -> Salvage(x, gerti))\nAcquaint(cybel, gerti) and Plumb(cybel, gerti) -> Retained(cybel)\nforall x (Salvage(x, cybel) -> Salvage(x, gerti))\n\nSalvage(cybel, cybel)\n\nSalvage(cybel, gerti) and forall x (Salvage(x, gerti) -> Salvage(x, cybel)) -> therefore Salvage(cybel, cybel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The nathalia is thundering. The nathalia is analyzed. The nathalia pulverize the trey. The nathalia clump the trey. The trey annunciate the nathalia. The trey is thundering. The trey is reformed. The trey is future. The trey is analyzed. The trey is thousand. If something annunciate the trey and it is analyzed then it clump the nathalia. If something is reformed then it annunciate the trey. If the nathalia clump the trey then the nathalia pulverize the trey. If something clump the nathalia then the nathalia annunciate the trey. If something clump the trey then it clump the nathalia. If something pulverize the nathalia then it clump the trey. If the nathalia annunciate the trey and the nathalia pulverize the trey then the nathalia is future. If something clump the nathalia then it clump the trey. The nathalia does not see the nathalia.", "logic": "\nThundering(nathalia)\nAnalyzed(nathalia)\nPulverize(nathalia, trey)\nClump(nathalia, trey)\nAnnunciate(trey, nathalia)\nThundering(trey)\nReformed(trey)\nFuture(trey)\nAnalyzed(trey)\nThousand(trey)\nforall x (Annunciate(x, trey) and Analyzed(x) -> Clump(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Reformed(x) -> Annunciate(x, trey))\nClump(nathalia, trey) -> Pulverize(nathalia, trey)\nforall x (Clump(x, nathalia) -> Annunciate(nathalia, trey))\nforall x (Clump(x, trey) -> Clump(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, nathalia) -> Clump(x, trey))\nAnnunciate(nathalia, trey) and Pulverize(nathalia, trey) -> Future(nathalia)\nforall x (Clump(x, nathalia) -> Clump(x, trey))\n\nnot Clump(nathalia, nathalia)\n\nClump(nathalia, trey) and forall x (Clump(x, trey) -> Clump(x, nathalia)) -> therefore Clump(nathalia, nathalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The hephzibah is financial. The hephzibah is broadloom. The hephzibah relearn the tudor. The hephzibah process the tudor. The tudor winnow the hephzibah. The tudor is financial. The tudor is ligneous. The tudor is butch. The tudor is broadloom. The tudor is perfected. If something winnow the tudor and it is broadloom then it process the hephzibah. If something is ligneous then it winnow the tudor. If the hephzibah process the tudor then the hephzibah relearn the tudor. If something process the hephzibah then the hephzibah winnow the tudor. If something process the tudor then it process the hephzibah. If something relearn the hephzibah then it process the tudor. If the hephzibah winnow the tudor and the hephzibah relearn the tudor then the hephzibah is butch. If something process the hephzibah then it process the tudor. The hephzibah winnow the tudor.", "logic": "\nFinancial(hephzibah)\nBroadloom(hephzibah)\nRelearn(hephzibah, tudor)\nProcess(hephzibah, tudor)\nWinnow(tudor, hephzibah)\nFinancial(tudor)\nLigneous(tudor)\nButch(tudor)\nBroadloom(tudor)\nPerfected(tudor)\nforall x (Winnow(x, tudor) and Broadloom(x) -> Process(x, hephzibah))\nforall x (Ligneous(x) -> Winnow(x, tudor))\nProcess(hephzibah, tudor) -> Relearn(hephzibah, tudor)\nforall x (Process(x, hephzibah) -> Winnow(hephzibah, tudor))\nforall x (Process(x, tudor) -> Process(x, hephzibah))\nforall x (Relearn(x, hephzibah) -> Process(x, tudor))\nWinnow(hephzibah, tudor) and Relearn(hephzibah, tudor) -> Butch(hephzibah)\nforall x (Process(x, hephzibah) -> Process(x, tudor))\n\nWinnow(hephzibah, tudor)\n\nProcess(hephzibah, tudor) and forall x (Process(x, tudor) -> Process(x, hephzibah)) -> therefore Process(hephzibah, hephzibah) Process(hephzibah, hephzibah) and forall x (Process(x, hephzibah) -> Winnow(hephzibah, tudor)) -> therefore Winnow(hephzibah, tudor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The gustaf is unconsumed. The gustaf is hornless. The gustaf profiteer the donovan. The gustaf latinise the donovan. The donovan serve the gustaf. The donovan is unconsumed. The donovan is pectoral. The donovan is lamented. The donovan is hornless. The donovan is mishnaic. If something serve the donovan and it is hornless then it latinise the gustaf. If something is pectoral then it serve the donovan. If the gustaf latinise the donovan then the gustaf profiteer the donovan. If something latinise the gustaf then the gustaf serve the donovan. If something latinise the donovan then it latinise the gustaf. If something profiteer the gustaf then it latinise the donovan. If the gustaf serve the donovan and the gustaf profiteer the donovan then the gustaf is lamented. If something latinise the gustaf then it latinise the donovan. The donovan does not see the gustaf.", "logic": "\nUnconsumed(gustaf)\nHornless(gustaf)\nProfiteer(gustaf, donovan)\nLatinise(gustaf, donovan)\nServe(donovan, gustaf)\nUnconsumed(donovan)\nPectoral(donovan)\nLamented(donovan)\nHornless(donovan)\nMishnaic(donovan)\nforall x (Serve(x, donovan) and Hornless(x) -> Latinise(x, gustaf))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> Serve(x, donovan))\nLatinise(gustaf, donovan) -> Profiteer(gustaf, donovan)\nforall x (Latinise(x, gustaf) -> Serve(gustaf, donovan))\nforall x (Latinise(x, donovan) -> Latinise(x, gustaf))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, gustaf) -> Latinise(x, donovan))\nServe(gustaf, donovan) and Profiteer(gustaf, donovan) -> Lamented(gustaf)\nforall x (Latinise(x, gustaf) -> Latinise(x, donovan))\n\nnot Latinise(donovan, gustaf)\n\nPectoral(donovan) and forall x (Pectoral(x) -> Serve(x, donovan)) -> therefore Serve(donovan, donovan) Serve(donovan, donovan) and Hornless(donovan) and forall x (Serve(x, donovan) and Hornless(x) -> Latinise(x, gustaf)) -> therefore Latinise(donovan, gustaf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The sybyl is southward. The sybyl is mild. The sybyl girth the rafaelita. The sybyl unionize the rafaelita. The rafaelita input the sybyl. The rafaelita is southward. The rafaelita is arrant. The rafaelita is alular. The rafaelita is mild. The rafaelita is unopen. If something input the rafaelita and it is mild then it unionize the sybyl. If something is arrant then it input the rafaelita. If the sybyl unionize the rafaelita then the sybyl girth the rafaelita. If something unionize the sybyl then the sybyl input the rafaelita. If something unionize the rafaelita then it unionize the sybyl. If something girth the sybyl then it unionize the rafaelita. If the sybyl input the rafaelita and the sybyl girth the rafaelita then the sybyl is alular. If something unionize the sybyl then it unionize the rafaelita. The rafaelita unionize the rafaelita.", "logic": "\nSouthward(sybyl)\nMild(sybyl)\nGirth(sybyl, rafaelita)\nUnionize(sybyl, rafaelita)\nInput(rafaelita, sybyl)\nSouthward(rafaelita)\nArrant(rafaelita)\nAlular(rafaelita)\nMild(rafaelita)\nUnopen(rafaelita)\nforall x (Input(x, rafaelita) and Mild(x) -> Unionize(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Arrant(x) -> Input(x, rafaelita))\nUnionize(sybyl, rafaelita) -> Girth(sybyl, rafaelita)\nforall x (Unionize(x, sybyl) -> Input(sybyl, rafaelita))\nforall x (Unionize(x, rafaelita) -> Unionize(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Girth(x, sybyl) -> Unionize(x, rafaelita))\nInput(sybyl, rafaelita) and Girth(sybyl, rafaelita) -> Alular(sybyl)\nforall x (Unionize(x, sybyl) -> Unionize(x, rafaelita))\n\nUnionize(rafaelita, rafaelita)\n\nArrant(rafaelita) and forall x (Arrant(x) -> Input(x, rafaelita)) -> therefore Input(rafaelita, rafaelita) Input(rafaelita, rafaelita) and Mild(rafaelita) and forall x (Input(x, rafaelita) and Mild(x) -> Unionize(x, sybyl)) -> therefore Unionize(rafaelita, sybyl) Unionize(rafaelita, sybyl) and forall x (Unionize(x, sybyl) -> Unionize(x, rafaelita)) -> therefore Unionize(rafaelita, rafaelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The maynord is acroscopic. The maynord is faustian. The maynord jaunt the allsun. The maynord chuck the allsun. The allsun agenise the maynord. The allsun is acroscopic. The allsun is indulgent. The allsun is drained. The allsun is faustian. The allsun is appointed. If something agenise the allsun and it is faustian then it chuck the maynord. If something is indulgent then it agenise the allsun. If the maynord chuck the allsun then the maynord jaunt the allsun. If something chuck the maynord then the maynord agenise the allsun. If something chuck the allsun then it chuck the maynord. If something jaunt the maynord then it chuck the allsun. If the maynord agenise the allsun and the maynord jaunt the allsun then the maynord is drained. If something chuck the maynord then it chuck the allsun. The maynord is not drained.", "logic": "\nAcroscopic(maynord)\nFaustian(maynord)\nJaunt(maynord, allsun)\nChuck(maynord, allsun)\nAgenise(allsun, maynord)\nAcroscopic(allsun)\nIndulgent(allsun)\nDrained(allsun)\nFaustian(allsun)\nAppointed(allsun)\nforall x (Agenise(x, allsun) and Faustian(x) -> Chuck(x, maynord))\nforall x (Indulgent(x) -> Agenise(x, allsun))\nChuck(maynord, allsun) -> Jaunt(maynord, allsun)\nforall x (Chuck(x, maynord) -> Agenise(maynord, allsun))\nforall x (Chuck(x, allsun) -> Chuck(x, maynord))\nforall x (Jaunt(x, maynord) -> Chuck(x, allsun))\nAgenise(maynord, allsun) and Jaunt(maynord, allsun) -> Drained(maynord)\nforall x (Chuck(x, maynord) -> Chuck(x, allsun))\n\nnot Drained(maynord)\n\nChuck(maynord, allsun) and forall x (Chuck(x, allsun) -> Chuck(x, maynord)) -> therefore Chuck(maynord, maynord) Chuck(maynord, maynord) and forall x (Chuck(x, maynord) -> Agenise(maynord, allsun)) -> therefore Agenise(maynord, allsun) Agenise(maynord, allsun) and Jaunt(maynord, allsun) and Agenise(maynord, allsun) and Jaunt(maynord, allsun) -> Drained(maynord) -> therefore Drained(maynord)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The sander is antithetic. The sander is bright. The sander perm the cosette. The sander vitalise the cosette. The cosette distil the sander. The cosette is antithetic. The cosette is debonnaire. The cosette is urceolate. The cosette is bright. The cosette is afire. If something distil the cosette and it is bright then it vitalise the sander. If something is debonnaire then it distil the cosette. If the sander vitalise the cosette then the sander perm the cosette. If something vitalise the sander then the sander distil the cosette. If something vitalise the cosette then it vitalise the sander. If something perm the sander then it vitalise the cosette. If the sander distil the cosette and the sander perm the cosette then the sander is urceolate. If something vitalise the sander then it vitalise the cosette. The cosette does not need the cosette.", "logic": "\nAntithetic(sander)\nBright(sander)\nPerm(sander, cosette)\nVitalise(sander, cosette)\nDistil(cosette, sander)\nAntithetic(cosette)\nDebonnaire(cosette)\nUrceolate(cosette)\nBright(cosette)\nAfire(cosette)\nforall x (Distil(x, cosette) and Bright(x) -> Vitalise(x, sander))\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) -> Distil(x, cosette))\nVitalise(sander, cosette) -> Perm(sander, cosette)\nforall x (Vitalise(x, sander) -> Distil(sander, cosette))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, cosette) -> Vitalise(x, sander))\nforall x (Perm(x, sander) -> Vitalise(x, cosette))\nDistil(sander, cosette) and Perm(sander, cosette) -> Urceolate(sander)\nforall x (Vitalise(x, sander) -> Vitalise(x, cosette))\n\nnot Perm(cosette, cosette)\n\nnot Perm(cosette, cosette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The tymothy is lacustrine. The tymothy is demented. The tymothy faze the allina. The tymothy bankrupt the allina. The allina rebound the tymothy. The allina is lacustrine. The allina is torpid. The allina is officious. The allina is demented. The allina is milanese. If something rebound the allina and it is demented then it bankrupt the tymothy. If something is torpid then it rebound the allina. If the tymothy bankrupt the allina then the tymothy faze the allina. If something bankrupt the tymothy then the tymothy rebound the allina. If something bankrupt the allina then it bankrupt the tymothy. If something faze the tymothy then it bankrupt the allina. If the tymothy rebound the allina and the tymothy faze the allina then the tymothy is officious. If something bankrupt the tymothy then it bankrupt the allina. The tymothy rebound the tymothy.", "logic": "\nLacustrine(tymothy)\nDemented(tymothy)\nFaze(tymothy, allina)\nBankrupt(tymothy, allina)\nRebound(allina, tymothy)\nLacustrine(allina)\nTorpid(allina)\nOfficious(allina)\nDemented(allina)\nMilanese(allina)\nforall x (Rebound(x, allina) and Demented(x) -> Bankrupt(x, tymothy))\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Rebound(x, allina))\nBankrupt(tymothy, allina) -> Faze(tymothy, allina)\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, tymothy) -> Rebound(tymothy, allina))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, allina) -> Bankrupt(x, tymothy))\nforall x (Faze(x, tymothy) -> Bankrupt(x, allina))\nRebound(tymothy, allina) and Faze(tymothy, allina) -> Officious(tymothy)\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, tymothy) -> Bankrupt(x, allina))\n\nRebound(tymothy, tymothy)\n\nRebound(tymothy, tymothy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The hirsch is weedy. The hirsch is stateless. The hirsch rescind the rowe. The hirsch smuggle the rowe. The rowe plain the hirsch. The rowe is weedy. The rowe is horrible. The rowe is horrifying. The rowe is stateless. The rowe is hatted. If something plain the rowe and it is stateless then it smuggle the hirsch. If something is horrible then it plain the rowe. If the hirsch smuggle the rowe then the hirsch rescind the rowe. If something smuggle the hirsch then the hirsch plain the rowe. If something smuggle the rowe then it smuggle the hirsch. If something rescind the hirsch then it smuggle the rowe. If the hirsch plain the rowe and the hirsch rescind the rowe then the hirsch is horrifying. If something smuggle the hirsch then it smuggle the rowe. The hirsch is not hatted.", "logic": "\nWeedy(hirsch)\nStateless(hirsch)\nRescind(hirsch, rowe)\nSmuggle(hirsch, rowe)\nPlain(rowe, hirsch)\nWeedy(rowe)\nHorrible(rowe)\nHorrifying(rowe)\nStateless(rowe)\nHatted(rowe)\nforall x (Plain(x, rowe) and Stateless(x) -> Smuggle(x, hirsch))\nforall x (Horrible(x) -> Plain(x, rowe))\nSmuggle(hirsch, rowe) -> Rescind(hirsch, rowe)\nforall x (Smuggle(x, hirsch) -> Plain(hirsch, rowe))\nforall x (Smuggle(x, rowe) -> Smuggle(x, hirsch))\nforall x (Rescind(x, hirsch) -> Smuggle(x, rowe))\nPlain(hirsch, rowe) and Rescind(hirsch, rowe) -> Horrifying(hirsch)\nforall x (Smuggle(x, hirsch) -> Smuggle(x, rowe))\n\nnot Hatted(hirsch)\n\nnot Hatted(hirsch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The gunner is calculable. The gunner is alluring. The gunner begrudge the esta. The gunner luminesce the esta. The esta dissertate the gunner. The esta is calculable. The esta is protrusile. The esta is aboveboard. The esta is alluring. The esta is stray. If something dissertate the esta and it is alluring then it luminesce the gunner. If something is protrusile then it dissertate the esta. If the gunner luminesce the esta then the gunner begrudge the esta. If something luminesce the gunner then the gunner dissertate the esta. If something luminesce the esta then it luminesce the gunner. If something begrudge the gunner then it luminesce the esta. If the gunner dissertate the esta and the gunner begrudge the esta then the gunner is aboveboard. If something luminesce the gunner then it luminesce the esta. The gunner is protrusile.", "logic": "\nCalculable(gunner)\nAlluring(gunner)\nBegrudge(gunner, esta)\nLuminesce(gunner, esta)\nDissertate(esta, gunner)\nCalculable(esta)\nProtrusile(esta)\nAboveboard(esta)\nAlluring(esta)\nStray(esta)\nforall x (Dissertate(x, esta) and Alluring(x) -> Luminesce(x, gunner))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Dissertate(x, esta))\nLuminesce(gunner, esta) -> Begrudge(gunner, esta)\nforall x (Luminesce(x, gunner) -> Dissertate(gunner, esta))\nforall x (Luminesce(x, esta) -> Luminesce(x, gunner))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, gunner) -> Luminesce(x, esta))\nDissertate(gunner, esta) and Begrudge(gunner, esta) -> Aboveboard(gunner)\nforall x (Luminesce(x, gunner) -> Luminesce(x, esta))\n\nProtrusile(gunner)\n\nProtrusile(gunner) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The gwennie is aplacental. The gwennie is shifting. The gwennie rarify the merissa. The gwennie empale the merissa. The merissa honk the gwennie. The merissa is aplacental. The merissa is wigless. The merissa is scarlet. The merissa is shifting. The merissa is digestible. If something honk the merissa and it is shifting then it empale the gwennie. If something is wigless then it honk the merissa. If the gwennie empale the merissa then the gwennie rarify the merissa. If something empale the gwennie then the gwennie honk the merissa. If something empale the merissa then it empale the gwennie. If something rarify the gwennie then it empale the merissa. If the gwennie honk the merissa and the gwennie rarify the merissa then the gwennie is scarlet. If something empale the gwennie then it empale the merissa. The gwennie does not need the gwennie.", "logic": "\nAplacental(gwennie)\nShifting(gwennie)\nRarify(gwennie, merissa)\nEmpale(gwennie, merissa)\nHonk(merissa, gwennie)\nAplacental(merissa)\nWigless(merissa)\nScarlet(merissa)\nShifting(merissa)\nDigestible(merissa)\nforall x (Honk(x, merissa) and Shifting(x) -> Empale(x, gwennie))\nforall x (Wigless(x) -> Honk(x, merissa))\nEmpale(gwennie, merissa) -> Rarify(gwennie, merissa)\nforall x (Empale(x, gwennie) -> Honk(gwennie, merissa))\nforall x (Empale(x, merissa) -> Empale(x, gwennie))\nforall x (Rarify(x, gwennie) -> Empale(x, merissa))\nHonk(gwennie, merissa) and Rarify(gwennie, merissa) -> Scarlet(gwennie)\nforall x (Empale(x, gwennie) -> Empale(x, merissa))\n\nnot Rarify(gwennie, gwennie)\n\nnot Rarify(gwennie, gwennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The maxie is proved. The maxie is percussive. The maxie blubber the clarey. The maxie stammer the clarey. The clarey crap the maxie. The clarey is proved. The clarey is colorectal. The clarey is curtained. The clarey is percussive. The clarey is occidental. If something crap the clarey and it is percussive then it stammer the maxie. If something is colorectal then it crap the clarey. If the maxie stammer the clarey then the maxie blubber the clarey. If something stammer the maxie then the maxie crap the clarey. If something stammer the clarey then it stammer the maxie. If something blubber the maxie then it stammer the clarey. If the maxie crap the clarey and the maxie blubber the clarey then the maxie is curtained. If something stammer the maxie then it stammer the clarey. The clarey blubber the maxie.", "logic": "\nProved(maxie)\nPercussive(maxie)\nBlubber(maxie, clarey)\nStammer(maxie, clarey)\nCrap(clarey, maxie)\nProved(clarey)\nColorectal(clarey)\nCurtained(clarey)\nPercussive(clarey)\nOccidental(clarey)\nforall x (Crap(x, clarey) and Percussive(x) -> Stammer(x, maxie))\nforall x (Colorectal(x) -> Crap(x, clarey))\nStammer(maxie, clarey) -> Blubber(maxie, clarey)\nforall x (Stammer(x, maxie) -> Crap(maxie, clarey))\nforall x (Stammer(x, clarey) -> Stammer(x, maxie))\nforall x (Blubber(x, maxie) -> Stammer(x, clarey))\nCrap(maxie, clarey) and Blubber(maxie, clarey) -> Curtained(maxie)\nforall x (Stammer(x, maxie) -> Stammer(x, clarey))\n\nBlubber(clarey, maxie)\n\nBlubber(clarey, maxie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "Bernd is warped. Bernd is matching. Bernd is unreleased. White, infinite things are bulgy. All infinite things are unreleased. All bulgy things are spirituous. Rough, unreleased things are warped. If something is spirituous then it is matching. All infinite, parotid things are spirituous. All warped, spirituous things are bulgy. If something is matching then it is infinite. Bernd is unreleased.", "logic": "\nWarped(bernd)\nMatching(bernd)\nUnreleased(bernd)\nforall x (Unreleased(x) and Infinite(x) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) -> Unreleased(x))\nforall x (Bulgy(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) and Unreleased(x) -> Warped(x))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) and Parotid(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Warped(x) and Spirituous(x) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Matching(x) -> Infinite(x))\n\nUnreleased(bernd)\n\ntherefore Unreleased(bernd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Shanie is ahead. Shanie is gastric. Shanie is squishy. White, unicuspid things are mastoid. All unicuspid things are squishy. All mastoid things are libidinous. Rough, squishy things are ahead. If something is libidinous then it is gastric. All unicuspid, biyearly things are libidinous. All ahead, libidinous things are mastoid. If something is gastric then it is unicuspid. Shanie is not ahead.", "logic": "\nAhead(shanie)\nGastric(shanie)\nSquishy(shanie)\nforall x (Squishy(x) and Unicuspid(x) -> Mastoid(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Libidinous(x) and Squishy(x) -> Ahead(x))\nforall x (Libidinous(x) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) and Biyearly(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) and Libidinous(x) -> Mastoid(x))\nforall x (Gastric(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\n\nnot Ahead(shanie)\n\ntherefore Ahead(shanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Woochang is bound. Woochang is ultimo. Woochang is keyed. White, goosey things are marvelous. All goosey things are keyed. All marvelous things are bared. Rough, keyed things are bound. If something is bared then it is ultimo. All goosey, battleful things are bared. All bound, bared things are marvelous. If something is ultimo then it is goosey. Woochang is goosey.", "logic": "\nBound(woochang)\nUltimo(woochang)\nKeyed(woochang)\nforall x (Keyed(x) and Goosey(x) -> Marvelous(x))\nforall x (Goosey(x) -> Keyed(x))\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> Bared(x))\nforall x (Bared(x) and Keyed(x) -> Bound(x))\nforall x (Bared(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nforall x (Goosey(x) and Battleful(x) -> Bared(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) and Bared(x) -> Marvelous(x))\nforall x (Ultimo(x) -> Goosey(x))\n\nGoosey(woochang)\n\nUltimo(woochang) and forall x (Ultimo(x) -> Goosey(x)) -> therefore Goosey(woochang)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Warden is ammoniac. Warden is narrative. Warden is bluish. White, redux things are animating. All redux things are bluish. All animating things are remaining. Rough, bluish things are ammoniac. If something is remaining then it is narrative. All redux, happy things are remaining. All ammoniac, remaining things are animating. If something is narrative then it is redux. Warden is not redux.", "logic": "\nAmmoniac(warden)\nNarrative(warden)\nBluish(warden)\nforall x (Bluish(x) and Redux(x) -> Animating(x))\nforall x (Redux(x) -> Bluish(x))\nforall x (Animating(x) -> Remaining(x))\nforall x (Remaining(x) and Bluish(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Remaining(x) -> Narrative(x))\nforall x (Redux(x) and Happy(x) -> Remaining(x))\nforall x (Ammoniac(x) and Remaining(x) -> Animating(x))\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Redux(x))\n\nnot Redux(warden)\n\nNarrative(warden) and forall x (Narrative(x) -> Redux(x)) -> therefore Redux(warden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Eddie is arid. Eddie is afrikaans. Eddie is bent. White, injured things are impulsive. All injured things are bent. All impulsive things are brute. Rough, bent things are arid. If something is brute then it is afrikaans. All injured, titular things are brute. All arid, brute things are impulsive. If something is afrikaans then it is injured. Eddie is impulsive.", "logic": "\nArid(eddie)\nAfrikaans(eddie)\nBent(eddie)\nforall x (Bent(x) and Injured(x) -> Impulsive(x))\nforall x (Injured(x) -> Bent(x))\nforall x (Impulsive(x) -> Brute(x))\nforall x (Brute(x) and Bent(x) -> Arid(x))\nforall x (Brute(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Injured(x) and Titular(x) -> Brute(x))\nforall x (Arid(x) and Brute(x) -> Impulsive(x))\nforall x (Afrikaans(x) -> Injured(x))\n\nImpulsive(eddie)\n\nAfrikaans(eddie) and forall x (Afrikaans(x) -> Injured(x)) -> therefore Injured(eddie) Bent(eddie) and Injured(eddie) and forall x (Bent(x) and Injured(x) -> Impulsive(x)) -> therefore Impulsive(eddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Laure is calyptrate. Laure is loaded. Laure is etiolate. White, unbacked things are gluttonous. All unbacked things are etiolate. All gluttonous things are venerating. Rough, etiolate things are calyptrate. If something is venerating then it is loaded. All unbacked, skeptical things are venerating. All calyptrate, venerating things are gluttonous. If something is loaded then it is unbacked. Laure is not gluttonous.", "logic": "\nCalyptrate(laure)\nLoaded(laure)\nEtiolate(laure)\nforall x (Etiolate(x) and Unbacked(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) -> Etiolate(x))\nforall x (Gluttonous(x) -> Venerating(x))\nforall x (Venerating(x) and Etiolate(x) -> Calyptrate(x))\nforall x (Venerating(x) -> Loaded(x))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) and Skeptical(x) -> Venerating(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) and Venerating(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Loaded(x) -> Unbacked(x))\n\nnot Gluttonous(laure)\n\nLoaded(laure) and forall x (Loaded(x) -> Unbacked(x)) -> therefore Unbacked(laure) Etiolate(laure) and Unbacked(laure) and forall x (Etiolate(x) and Unbacked(x) -> Gluttonous(x)) -> therefore Gluttonous(laure)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Phyllis is bald. Phyllis is punctual. Phyllis is graduate. White, ateleiotic things are deficient. All ateleiotic things are graduate. All deficient things are aversive. Rough, graduate things are bald. If something is aversive then it is punctual. All ateleiotic, unclaimed things are aversive. All bald, aversive things are deficient. If something is punctual then it is ateleiotic. Phyllis is aversive.", "logic": "\nBald(phyllis)\nPunctual(phyllis)\nGraduate(phyllis)\nforall x (Graduate(x) and Ateleiotic(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Ateleiotic(x) -> Graduate(x))\nforall x (Deficient(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Aversive(x) and Graduate(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Aversive(x) -> Punctual(x))\nforall x (Ateleiotic(x) and Unclaimed(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Aversive(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Punctual(x) -> Ateleiotic(x))\n\nAversive(phyllis)\n\nPunctual(phyllis) and forall x (Punctual(x) -> Ateleiotic(x)) -> therefore Ateleiotic(phyllis) Graduate(phyllis) and Ateleiotic(phyllis) and forall x (Graduate(x) and Ateleiotic(x) -> Deficient(x)) -> therefore Deficient(phyllis) Deficient(phyllis) and forall x (Deficient(x) -> Aversive(x)) -> therefore Aversive(phyllis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Terry is overriding. Terry is prepared. Terry is effective. White, ammino things are lobate. All ammino things are effective. All lobate things are washy. Rough, effective things are overriding. If something is washy then it is prepared. All ammino, assentient things are washy. All overriding, washy things are lobate. If something is prepared then it is ammino. Terry is not washy.", "logic": "\nOverriding(terry)\nPrepared(terry)\nEffective(terry)\nforall x (Effective(x) and Ammino(x) -> Lobate(x))\nforall x (Ammino(x) -> Effective(x))\nforall x (Lobate(x) -> Washy(x))\nforall x (Washy(x) and Effective(x) -> Overriding(x))\nforall x (Washy(x) -> Prepared(x))\nforall x (Ammino(x) and Assentient(x) -> Washy(x))\nforall x (Overriding(x) and Washy(x) -> Lobate(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Ammino(x))\n\nnot Washy(terry)\n\nPrepared(terry) and forall x (Prepared(x) -> Ammino(x)) -> therefore Ammino(terry) Effective(terry) and Ammino(terry) and forall x (Effective(x) and Ammino(x) -> Lobate(x)) -> therefore Lobate(terry) Lobate(terry) and forall x (Lobate(x) -> Washy(x)) -> therefore Washy(terry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "The noam does not eat the jefry. The noam is reactive. The jefry vroom the aurel. The jefry flee the aurel. The jefry is reliant. The jefry appease the noam. The aurel vroom the noam. The aurel does not chase the jefry. The aurel flee the noam. The aurel flee the jefry. If someone flee the aurel then they are reactive. If someone appease the aurel then the aurel does not visit the noam. If the jefry flee the aurel then the aurel appease the jefry. If someone appease the jefry then they visit the aurel. If someone vroom the jefry and they are unsweet then they eat the jefry. If the jefry appease the noam then the jefry flee the noam. If someone is unsweet then they chase the jefry. If someone flee the noam and they are scarce then the noam flee the aurel. The aurel flee the jefry.", "logic": "\nnot Flee(noam, jefry)\nReactive(noam)\nVroom(jefry, aurel)\nFlee(jefry, aurel)\nReliant(jefry)\nAppease(jefry, noam)\nVroom(aurel, noam)\nnot Vroom(aurel, jefry)\nFlee(aurel, noam)\nFlee(aurel, jefry)\nforall x (Flee(x, aurel) -> Reactive(x))\nforall x (Appease(x, aurel) -> not Appease(aurel, noam))\nFlee(jefry, aurel) -> Appease(aurel, jefry)\nforall x (Appease(x, jefry) -> Appease(x, aurel))\nforall x (Vroom(x, jefry) and Unsweet(x) -> Flee(x, jefry))\nAppease(jefry, noam) -> Flee(jefry, noam)\nforall x (Unsweet(x) -> Vroom(x, jefry))\nforall x (Flee(x, noam) and Scarce(x) -> Flee(noam, aurel))\n\nFlee(aurel, jefry)\n\ntherefore Flee(aurel, jefry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The nicolas does not eat the lurlene. The nicolas is tetchy. The lurlene allow the consuelo. The lurlene proscribe the consuelo. The lurlene is unveiled. The lurlene larrup the nicolas. The consuelo allow the nicolas. The consuelo does not chase the lurlene. The consuelo proscribe the nicolas. The consuelo proscribe the lurlene. If someone proscribe the consuelo then they are tetchy. If someone larrup the consuelo then the consuelo does not visit the nicolas. If the lurlene proscribe the consuelo then the consuelo larrup the lurlene. If someone larrup the lurlene then they visit the consuelo. If someone allow the lurlene and they are initiative then they eat the lurlene. If the lurlene larrup the nicolas then the lurlene proscribe the nicolas. If someone is initiative then they chase the lurlene. If someone proscribe the nicolas and they are tailless then the nicolas proscribe the consuelo. The consuelo does not eat the lurlene.", "logic": "\nnot Proscribe(nicolas, lurlene)\nTetchy(nicolas)\nAllow(lurlene, consuelo)\nProscribe(lurlene, consuelo)\nUnveiled(lurlene)\nLarrup(lurlene, nicolas)\nAllow(consuelo, nicolas)\nnot Allow(consuelo, lurlene)\nProscribe(consuelo, nicolas)\nProscribe(consuelo, lurlene)\nforall x (Proscribe(x, consuelo) -> Tetchy(x))\nforall x (Larrup(x, consuelo) -> not Larrup(consuelo, nicolas))\nProscribe(lurlene, consuelo) -> Larrup(consuelo, lurlene)\nforall x (Larrup(x, lurlene) -> Larrup(x, consuelo))\nforall x (Allow(x, lurlene) and Initiative(x) -> Proscribe(x, lurlene))\nLarrup(lurlene, nicolas) -> Proscribe(lurlene, nicolas)\nforall x (Initiative(x) -> Allow(x, lurlene))\nforall x (Proscribe(x, nicolas) and Tailless(x) -> Proscribe(nicolas, consuelo))\n\nnot Proscribe(consuelo, lurlene)\n\ntherefore Proscribe(consuelo, lurlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The miguela does not eat the rand. The miguela is oleophobic. The rand cohabit the townsend. The rand depute the townsend. The rand is incendiary. The rand mismanage the miguela. The townsend cohabit the miguela. The townsend does not chase the rand. The townsend depute the miguela. The townsend depute the rand. If someone depute the townsend then they are oleophobic. If someone mismanage the townsend then the townsend does not visit the miguela. If the rand depute the townsend then the townsend mismanage the rand. If someone mismanage the rand then they visit the townsend. If someone cohabit the rand and they are copious then they eat the rand. If the rand mismanage the miguela then the rand depute the miguela. If someone is copious then they chase the rand. If someone depute the miguela and they are snaky then the miguela depute the townsend. The rand depute the miguela.", "logic": "\nnot Depute(miguela, rand)\nOleophobic(miguela)\nCohabit(rand, townsend)\nDepute(rand, townsend)\nIncendiary(rand)\nMismanage(rand, miguela)\nCohabit(townsend, miguela)\nnot Cohabit(townsend, rand)\nDepute(townsend, miguela)\nDepute(townsend, rand)\nforall x (Depute(x, townsend) -> Oleophobic(x))\nforall x (Mismanage(x, townsend) -> not Mismanage(townsend, miguela))\nDepute(rand, townsend) -> Mismanage(townsend, rand)\nforall x (Mismanage(x, rand) -> Mismanage(x, townsend))\nforall x (Cohabit(x, rand) and Copious(x) -> Depute(x, rand))\nMismanage(rand, miguela) -> Depute(rand, miguela)\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Cohabit(x, rand))\nforall x (Depute(x, miguela) and Snaky(x) -> Depute(miguela, townsend))\n\nDepute(rand, miguela)\n\nMismanage(rand, miguela) and Mismanage(rand, miguela) -> Depute(rand, miguela) -> therefore Depute(rand, miguela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The guthrey does not eat the paige. The guthrey is fingerlike. The paige moil the gusti. The paige census the gusti. The paige is xenogeneic. The paige digest the guthrey. The gusti moil the guthrey. The gusti does not chase the paige. The gusti census the guthrey. The gusti census the paige. If someone census the gusti then they are fingerlike. If someone digest the gusti then the gusti does not visit the guthrey. If the paige census the gusti then the gusti digest the paige. If someone digest the paige then they visit the gusti. If someone moil the paige and they are antiseptic then they eat the paige. If the paige digest the guthrey then the paige census the guthrey. If someone is antiseptic then they chase the paige. If someone census the guthrey and they are maddened then the guthrey census the gusti. The paige does not eat the guthrey.", "logic": "\nnot Census(guthrey, paige)\nFingerlike(guthrey)\nMoil(paige, gusti)\nCensus(paige, gusti)\nXenogeneic(paige)\nDigest(paige, guthrey)\nMoil(gusti, guthrey)\nnot Moil(gusti, paige)\nCensus(gusti, guthrey)\nCensus(gusti, paige)\nforall x (Census(x, gusti) -> Fingerlike(x))\nforall x (Digest(x, gusti) -> not Digest(gusti, guthrey))\nCensus(paige, gusti) -> Digest(gusti, paige)\nforall x (Digest(x, paige) -> Digest(x, gusti))\nforall x (Moil(x, paige) and Antiseptic(x) -> Census(x, paige))\nDigest(paige, guthrey) -> Census(paige, guthrey)\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) -> Moil(x, paige))\nforall x (Census(x, guthrey) and Maddened(x) -> Census(guthrey, gusti))\n\nnot Census(paige, guthrey)\n\nDigest(paige, guthrey) and Digest(paige, guthrey) -> Census(paige, guthrey) -> therefore Census(paige, guthrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The ilsa does not eat the hanan. The ilsa is runaway. The hanan poleaxe the britani. The hanan house the britani. The hanan is unheeding. The hanan explain the ilsa. The britani poleaxe the ilsa. The britani does not chase the hanan. The britani house the ilsa. The britani house the hanan. If someone house the britani then they are runaway. If someone explain the britani then the britani does not visit the ilsa. If the hanan house the britani then the britani explain the hanan. If someone explain the hanan then they visit the britani. If someone poleaxe the hanan and they are french then they eat the hanan. If the hanan explain the ilsa then the hanan house the ilsa. If someone is french then they chase the hanan. If someone house the ilsa and they are farcical then the ilsa house the britani. The britani explain the britani.", "logic": "\nnot House(ilsa, hanan)\nRunaway(ilsa)\nPoleaxe(hanan, britani)\nHouse(hanan, britani)\nUnheeding(hanan)\nExplain(hanan, ilsa)\nPoleaxe(britani, ilsa)\nnot Poleaxe(britani, hanan)\nHouse(britani, ilsa)\nHouse(britani, hanan)\nforall x (House(x, britani) -> Runaway(x))\nforall x (Explain(x, britani) -> not Explain(britani, ilsa))\nHouse(hanan, britani) -> Explain(britani, hanan)\nforall x (Explain(x, hanan) -> Explain(x, britani))\nforall x (Poleaxe(x, hanan) and French(x) -> House(x, hanan))\nExplain(hanan, ilsa) -> House(hanan, ilsa)\nforall x (French(x) -> Poleaxe(x, hanan))\nforall x (House(x, ilsa) and Farcical(x) -> House(ilsa, britani))\n\nExplain(britani, britani)\n\nHouse(hanan, britani) and House(hanan, britani) -> Explain(britani, hanan) -> therefore Explain(britani, hanan) Explain(britani, hanan) and forall x (Explain(x, hanan) -> Explain(x, britani)) -> therefore Explain(britani, britani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The gwenni does not eat the sunny. The gwenni is precarious. The sunny sheathe the marley. The sunny untie the marley. The sunny is implicit. The sunny buttress the gwenni. The marley sheathe the gwenni. The marley does not chase the sunny. The marley untie the gwenni. The marley untie the sunny. If someone untie the marley then they are precarious. If someone buttress the marley then the marley does not visit the gwenni. If the sunny untie the marley then the marley buttress the sunny. If someone buttress the sunny then they visit the marley. If someone sheathe the sunny and they are fourfold then they eat the sunny. If the sunny buttress the gwenni then the sunny untie the gwenni. If someone is fourfold then they chase the sunny. If someone untie the gwenni and they are acritical then the gwenni untie the marley. The marley does not visit the marley.", "logic": "\nnot Untie(gwenni, sunny)\nPrecarious(gwenni)\nSheathe(sunny, marley)\nUntie(sunny, marley)\nImplicit(sunny)\nButtress(sunny, gwenni)\nSheathe(marley, gwenni)\nnot Sheathe(marley, sunny)\nUntie(marley, gwenni)\nUntie(marley, sunny)\nforall x (Untie(x, marley) -> Precarious(x))\nforall x (Buttress(x, marley) -> not Buttress(marley, gwenni))\nUntie(sunny, marley) -> Buttress(marley, sunny)\nforall x (Buttress(x, sunny) -> Buttress(x, marley))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, sunny) and Fourfold(x) -> Untie(x, sunny))\nButtress(sunny, gwenni) -> Untie(sunny, gwenni)\nforall x (Fourfold(x) -> Sheathe(x, sunny))\nforall x (Untie(x, gwenni) and Acritical(x) -> Untie(gwenni, marley))\n\nnot Buttress(marley, marley)\n\nUntie(sunny, marley) and Untie(sunny, marley) -> Buttress(marley, sunny) -> therefore Buttress(marley, sunny) Buttress(marley, sunny) and forall x (Buttress(x, sunny) -> Buttress(x, marley)) -> therefore Buttress(marley, marley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The sutton does not eat the janey. The sutton is decorative. The janey relinquish the harriot. The janey defoliate the harriot. The janey is alpha. The janey sand the sutton. The harriot relinquish the sutton. The harriot does not chase the janey. The harriot defoliate the sutton. The harriot defoliate the janey. If someone defoliate the harriot then they are decorative. If someone sand the harriot then the harriot does not visit the sutton. If the janey defoliate the harriot then the harriot sand the janey. If someone sand the janey then they visit the harriot. If someone relinquish the janey and they are ligneous then they eat the janey. If the janey sand the sutton then the janey defoliate the sutton. If someone is ligneous then they chase the janey. If someone defoliate the sutton and they are unmeasured then the sutton defoliate the harriot. The harriot does not visit the sutton.", "logic": "\nnot Defoliate(sutton, janey)\nDecorative(sutton)\nRelinquish(janey, harriot)\nDefoliate(janey, harriot)\nAlpha(janey)\nSand(janey, sutton)\nRelinquish(harriot, sutton)\nnot Relinquish(harriot, janey)\nDefoliate(harriot, sutton)\nDefoliate(harriot, janey)\nforall x (Defoliate(x, harriot) -> Decorative(x))\nforall x (Sand(x, harriot) -> not Sand(harriot, sutton))\nDefoliate(janey, harriot) -> Sand(harriot, janey)\nforall x (Sand(x, janey) -> Sand(x, harriot))\nforall x (Relinquish(x, janey) and Ligneous(x) -> Defoliate(x, janey))\nSand(janey, sutton) -> Defoliate(janey, sutton)\nforall x (Ligneous(x) -> Relinquish(x, janey))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, sutton) and Unmeasured(x) -> Defoliate(sutton, harriot))\n\nnot Sand(harriot, sutton)\n\nDefoliate(janey, harriot) and Defoliate(janey, harriot) -> Sand(harriot, janey) -> therefore Sand(harriot, janey) Sand(harriot, janey) and forall x (Sand(x, janey) -> Sand(x, harriot)) -> therefore Sand(harriot, harriot) Sand(harriot, harriot) and forall x (Sand(x, harriot) -> not Sand(harriot, sutton)) -> therefore not Sand(harriot, sutton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The bliss does not eat the francisco. The bliss is preferable. The francisco quail the erica. The francisco coerce the erica. The francisco is roundabout. The francisco boogie the bliss. The erica quail the bliss. The erica does not chase the francisco. The erica coerce the bliss. The erica coerce the francisco. If someone coerce the erica then they are preferable. If someone boogie the erica then the erica does not visit the bliss. If the francisco coerce the erica then the erica boogie the francisco. If someone boogie the francisco then they visit the erica. If someone quail the francisco and they are hateful then they eat the francisco. If the francisco boogie the bliss then the francisco coerce the bliss. If someone is hateful then they chase the francisco. If someone coerce the bliss and they are immunized then the bliss coerce the erica. The erica boogie the bliss.", "logic": "\nnot Coerce(bliss, francisco)\nPreferable(bliss)\nQuail(francisco, erica)\nCoerce(francisco, erica)\nRoundabout(francisco)\nBoogie(francisco, bliss)\nQuail(erica, bliss)\nnot Quail(erica, francisco)\nCoerce(erica, bliss)\nCoerce(erica, francisco)\nforall x (Coerce(x, erica) -> Preferable(x))\nforall x (Boogie(x, erica) -> not Boogie(erica, bliss))\nCoerce(francisco, erica) -> Boogie(erica, francisco)\nforall x (Boogie(x, francisco) -> Boogie(x, erica))\nforall x (Quail(x, francisco) and Hateful(x) -> Coerce(x, francisco))\nBoogie(francisco, bliss) -> Coerce(francisco, bliss)\nforall x (Hateful(x) -> Quail(x, francisco))\nforall x (Coerce(x, bliss) and Immunized(x) -> Coerce(bliss, erica))\n\nBoogie(erica, bliss)\n\nCoerce(francisco, erica) and Coerce(francisco, erica) -> Boogie(erica, francisco) -> therefore Boogie(erica, francisco) Boogie(erica, francisco) and forall x (Boogie(x, francisco) -> Boogie(x, erica)) -> therefore Boogie(erica, erica) Boogie(erica, erica) and forall x (Boogie(x, erica) -> not Boogie(erica, bliss)) -> therefore not Boogie(erica, bliss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The orlando does not eat the averell. The orlando is solitary. The averell weigh the jeffie. The averell dandify the jeffie. The averell is revolting. The averell decree the orlando. The jeffie weigh the orlando. The jeffie does not chase the averell. The jeffie dandify the orlando. The jeffie dandify the averell. If someone dandify the jeffie then they are solitary. If someone decree the jeffie then the jeffie does not visit the orlando. If the averell dandify the jeffie then the jeffie decree the averell. If someone decree the averell then they visit the jeffie. If someone weigh the averell and they are innate then they eat the averell. If the averell decree the orlando then the averell dandify the orlando. If someone is innate then they chase the averell. If someone dandify the orlando and they are agonised then the orlando dandify the jeffie. The averell does not chase the averell.", "logic": "\nnot Dandify(orlando, averell)\nSolitary(orlando)\nWeigh(averell, jeffie)\nDandify(averell, jeffie)\nRevolting(averell)\nDecree(averell, orlando)\nWeigh(jeffie, orlando)\nnot Weigh(jeffie, averell)\nDandify(jeffie, orlando)\nDandify(jeffie, averell)\nforall x (Dandify(x, jeffie) -> Solitary(x))\nforall x (Decree(x, jeffie) -> not Decree(jeffie, orlando))\nDandify(averell, jeffie) -> Decree(jeffie, averell)\nforall x (Decree(x, averell) -> Decree(x, jeffie))\nforall x (Weigh(x, averell) and Innate(x) -> Dandify(x, averell))\nDecree(averell, orlando) -> Dandify(averell, orlando)\nforall x (Innate(x) -> Weigh(x, averell))\nforall x (Dandify(x, orlando) and Agonised(x) -> Dandify(orlando, jeffie))\n\nnot Weigh(averell, averell)\n\nforall x (Innate(x) -> Weigh(x, averell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The paolo does not eat the dale. The paolo is severe. The dale overpraise the tani. The dale overgorge the tani. The dale is halfway. The dale agonize the paolo. The tani overpraise the paolo. The tani does not chase the dale. The tani overgorge the paolo. The tani overgorge the dale. If someone overgorge the tani then they are severe. If someone agonize the tani then the tani does not visit the paolo. If the dale overgorge the tani then the tani agonize the dale. If someone agonize the dale then they visit the tani. If someone overpraise the dale and they are divers then they eat the dale. If the dale agonize the paolo then the dale overgorge the paolo. If someone is divers then they chase the dale. If someone overgorge the paolo and they are seasick then the paolo overgorge the tani. The tani is severe.", "logic": "\nnot Overgorge(paolo, dale)\nSevere(paolo)\nOverpraise(dale, tani)\nOvergorge(dale, tani)\nHalfway(dale)\nAgonize(dale, paolo)\nOverpraise(tani, paolo)\nnot Overpraise(tani, dale)\nOvergorge(tani, paolo)\nOvergorge(tani, dale)\nforall x (Overgorge(x, tani) -> Severe(x))\nforall x (Agonize(x, tani) -> not Agonize(tani, paolo))\nOvergorge(dale, tani) -> Agonize(tani, dale)\nforall x (Agonize(x, dale) -> Agonize(x, tani))\nforall x (Overpraise(x, dale) and Divers(x) -> Overgorge(x, dale))\nAgonize(dale, paolo) -> Overgorge(dale, paolo)\nforall x (Divers(x) -> Overpraise(x, dale))\nforall x (Overgorge(x, paolo) and Seasick(x) -> Overgorge(paolo, tani))\n\nSevere(tani)\n\nforall x (Overgorge(x, tani) -> Severe(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The edgar does not eat the mariellen. The edgar is romanian. The mariellen laicise the casie. The mariellen discompose the casie. The mariellen is amber. The mariellen piffle the edgar. The casie laicise the edgar. The casie does not chase the mariellen. The casie discompose the edgar. The casie discompose the mariellen. If someone discompose the casie then they are romanian. If someone piffle the casie then the casie does not visit the edgar. If the mariellen discompose the casie then the casie piffle the mariellen. If someone piffle the mariellen then they visit the casie. If someone laicise the mariellen and they are sheeplike then they eat the mariellen. If the mariellen piffle the edgar then the mariellen discompose the edgar. If someone is sheeplike then they chase the mariellen. If someone discompose the edgar and they are stateless then the edgar discompose the casie. The mariellen does not visit the casie.", "logic": "\nnot Discompose(edgar, mariellen)\nRomanian(edgar)\nLaicise(mariellen, casie)\nDiscompose(mariellen, casie)\nAmber(mariellen)\nPiffle(mariellen, edgar)\nLaicise(casie, edgar)\nnot Laicise(casie, mariellen)\nDiscompose(casie, edgar)\nDiscompose(casie, mariellen)\nforall x (Discompose(x, casie) -> Romanian(x))\nforall x (Piffle(x, casie) -> not Piffle(casie, edgar))\nDiscompose(mariellen, casie) -> Piffle(casie, mariellen)\nforall x (Piffle(x, mariellen) -> Piffle(x, casie))\nforall x (Laicise(x, mariellen) and Sheeplike(x) -> Discompose(x, mariellen))\nPiffle(mariellen, edgar) -> Discompose(mariellen, edgar)\nforall x (Sheeplike(x) -> Laicise(x, mariellen))\nforall x (Discompose(x, edgar) and Stateless(x) -> Discompose(edgar, casie))\n\nnot Piffle(mariellen, casie)\n\nforall x (Piffle(x, mariellen) -> Piffle(x, casie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The marline does not eat the shem. The marline is phonetic. The shem trim the lianna. The shem dissever the lianna. The shem is eradicable. The shem center the marline. The lianna trim the marline. The lianna does not chase the shem. The lianna dissever the marline. The lianna dissever the shem. If someone dissever the lianna then they are phonetic. If someone center the lianna then the lianna does not visit the marline. If the shem dissever the lianna then the lianna center the shem. If someone center the shem then they visit the lianna. If someone trim the shem and they are ethnical then they eat the shem. If the shem center the marline then the shem dissever the marline. If someone is ethnical then they chase the shem. If someone dissever the marline and they are abandoned then the marline dissever the lianna. The marline dissever the lianna.", "logic": "\nnot Dissever(marline, shem)\nPhonetic(marline)\nTrim(shem, lianna)\nDissever(shem, lianna)\nEradicable(shem)\nCenter(shem, marline)\nTrim(lianna, marline)\nnot Trim(lianna, shem)\nDissever(lianna, marline)\nDissever(lianna, shem)\nforall x (Dissever(x, lianna) -> Phonetic(x))\nforall x (Center(x, lianna) -> not Center(lianna, marline))\nDissever(shem, lianna) -> Center(lianna, shem)\nforall x (Center(x, shem) -> Center(x, lianna))\nforall x (Trim(x, shem) and Ethnical(x) -> Dissever(x, shem))\nCenter(shem, marline) -> Dissever(shem, marline)\nforall x (Ethnical(x) -> Trim(x, shem))\nforall x (Dissever(x, marline) and Abandoned(x) -> Dissever(marline, lianna))\n\nDissever(marline, lianna)\n\nforall x (Dissever(x, marline) and Abandoned(x) -> Dissever(marline, lianna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The ketti does not eat the jolene. The ketti is valved. The jolene impart the garwood. The jolene twit the garwood. The jolene is subduable. The jolene vacate the ketti. The garwood impart the ketti. The garwood does not chase the jolene. The garwood twit the ketti. The garwood twit the jolene. If someone twit the garwood then they are valved. If someone vacate the garwood then the garwood does not visit the ketti. If the jolene twit the garwood then the garwood vacate the jolene. If someone vacate the jolene then they visit the garwood. If someone impart the jolene and they are wacky then they eat the jolene. If the jolene vacate the ketti then the jolene twit the ketti. If someone is wacky then they chase the jolene. If someone twit the ketti and they are dazed then the ketti twit the garwood. The jolene is not dazed.", "logic": "\nnot Twit(ketti, jolene)\nValved(ketti)\nImpart(jolene, garwood)\nTwit(jolene, garwood)\nSubduable(jolene)\nVacate(jolene, ketti)\nImpart(garwood, ketti)\nnot Impart(garwood, jolene)\nTwit(garwood, ketti)\nTwit(garwood, jolene)\nforall x (Twit(x, garwood) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Vacate(x, garwood) -> not Vacate(garwood, ketti))\nTwit(jolene, garwood) -> Vacate(garwood, jolene)\nforall x (Vacate(x, jolene) -> Vacate(x, garwood))\nforall x (Impart(x, jolene) and Wacky(x) -> Twit(x, jolene))\nVacate(jolene, ketti) -> Twit(jolene, ketti)\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Impart(x, jolene))\nforall x (Twit(x, ketti) and Dazed(x) -> Twit(ketti, garwood))\n\nnot Dazed(jolene)\n\nnot Dazed(jolene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The margaret does not eat the marielle. The margaret is pucka. The marielle deforest the amandi. The marielle justify the amandi. The marielle is unsized. The marielle insufflate the margaret. The amandi deforest the margaret. The amandi does not chase the marielle. The amandi justify the margaret. The amandi justify the marielle. If someone justify the amandi then they are pucka. If someone insufflate the amandi then the amandi does not visit the margaret. If the marielle justify the amandi then the amandi insufflate the marielle. If someone insufflate the marielle then they visit the amandi. If someone deforest the marielle and they are jolly then they eat the marielle. If the marielle insufflate the margaret then the marielle justify the margaret. If someone is jolly then they chase the marielle. If someone justify the margaret and they are flip then the margaret justify the amandi. The marielle deforest the margaret.", "logic": "\nnot Justify(margaret, marielle)\nPucka(margaret)\nDeforest(marielle, amandi)\nJustify(marielle, amandi)\nUnsized(marielle)\nInsufflate(marielle, margaret)\nDeforest(amandi, margaret)\nnot Deforest(amandi, marielle)\nJustify(amandi, margaret)\nJustify(amandi, marielle)\nforall x (Justify(x, amandi) -> Pucka(x))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, amandi) -> not Insufflate(amandi, margaret))\nJustify(marielle, amandi) -> Insufflate(amandi, marielle)\nforall x (Insufflate(x, marielle) -> Insufflate(x, amandi))\nforall x (Deforest(x, marielle) and Jolly(x) -> Justify(x, marielle))\nInsufflate(marielle, margaret) -> Justify(marielle, margaret)\nforall x (Jolly(x) -> Deforest(x, marielle))\nforall x (Justify(x, margaret) and Flip(x) -> Justify(margaret, amandi))\n\nDeforest(marielle, margaret)\n\nDeforest(marielle, margaret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The xever does not eat the keren. The xever is nonrigid. The keren dusk the adolfo. The keren refashion the adolfo. The keren is revokable. The keren evangelise the xever. The adolfo dusk the xever. The adolfo does not chase the keren. The adolfo refashion the xever. The adolfo refashion the keren. If someone refashion the adolfo then they are nonrigid. If someone evangelise the adolfo then the adolfo does not visit the xever. If the keren refashion the adolfo then the adolfo evangelise the keren. If someone evangelise the keren then they visit the adolfo. If someone dusk the keren and they are inaccurate then they eat the keren. If the keren evangelise the xever then the keren refashion the xever. If someone is inaccurate then they chase the keren. If someone refashion the xever and they are uncooked then the xever refashion the adolfo. The xever is not uncooked.", "logic": "\nnot Refashion(xever, keren)\nNonrigid(xever)\nDusk(keren, adolfo)\nRefashion(keren, adolfo)\nRevokable(keren)\nEvangelise(keren, xever)\nDusk(adolfo, xever)\nnot Dusk(adolfo, keren)\nRefashion(adolfo, xever)\nRefashion(adolfo, keren)\nforall x (Refashion(x, adolfo) -> Nonrigid(x))\nforall x (Evangelise(x, adolfo) -> not Evangelise(adolfo, xever))\nRefashion(keren, adolfo) -> Evangelise(adolfo, keren)\nforall x (Evangelise(x, keren) -> Evangelise(x, adolfo))\nforall x (Dusk(x, keren) and Inaccurate(x) -> Refashion(x, keren))\nEvangelise(keren, xever) -> Refashion(keren, xever)\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) -> Dusk(x, keren))\nforall x (Refashion(x, xever) and Uncooked(x) -> Refashion(xever, adolfo))\n\nnot Uncooked(xever)\n\nnot Uncooked(xever) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The eda does not eat the dahlia. The eda is upwind. The dahlia glower the natassia. The dahlia revet the natassia. The dahlia is witty. The dahlia resplend the eda. The natassia glower the eda. The natassia does not chase the dahlia. The natassia revet the eda. The natassia revet the dahlia. If someone revet the natassia then they are upwind. If someone resplend the natassia then the natassia does not visit the eda. If the dahlia revet the natassia then the natassia resplend the dahlia. If someone resplend the dahlia then they visit the natassia. If someone glower the dahlia and they are steroidal then they eat the dahlia. If the dahlia resplend the eda then the dahlia revet the eda. If someone is steroidal then they chase the dahlia. If someone revet the eda and they are existent then the eda revet the natassia. The eda glower the eda.", "logic": "\nnot Revet(eda, dahlia)\nUpwind(eda)\nGlower(dahlia, natassia)\nRevet(dahlia, natassia)\nWitty(dahlia)\nResplend(dahlia, eda)\nGlower(natassia, eda)\nnot Glower(natassia, dahlia)\nRevet(natassia, eda)\nRevet(natassia, dahlia)\nforall x (Revet(x, natassia) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Resplend(x, natassia) -> not Resplend(natassia, eda))\nRevet(dahlia, natassia) -> Resplend(natassia, dahlia)\nforall x (Resplend(x, dahlia) -> Resplend(x, natassia))\nforall x (Glower(x, dahlia) and Steroidal(x) -> Revet(x, dahlia))\nResplend(dahlia, eda) -> Revet(dahlia, eda)\nforall x (Steroidal(x) -> Glower(x, dahlia))\nforall x (Revet(x, eda) and Existent(x) -> Revet(eda, natassia))\n\nGlower(eda, eda)\n\nGlower(eda, eda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "Carly is myoid. Carly is not misused. Alston is misused. Alston is wearisome. Alston is confident. Alston is dissected. Faythe is myoid. Faythe is confident. Faythe is seven. Faythe is dissected. Gunilla is not myoid. Gunilla is estrous. If something is estrous then it is seven. If Carly is not myoid then Carly is misused. Quiet things are confident. If something is seven and wearisome then it is confident. If Alston is seven and Alston is wearisome then Alston is estrous. Green things are wearisome. All confident things are dissected. If something is myoid then it is estrous. Alston is wearisome.", "logic": "\nMyoid(carly)\nnot Misused(carly)\nMisused(alston)\nWearisome(alston)\nConfident(alston)\nDissected(alston)\nMyoid(faythe)\nConfident(faythe)\nSeven(faythe)\nDissected(faythe)\nnot Myoid(gunilla)\nEstrous(gunilla)\nforall x (Estrous(x) -> Seven(x))\nnot Myoid(carly) -> Misused(carly)\nforall x (Misused(x) -> Confident(x))\nforall x (Seven(x) and Wearisome(x) -> Confident(x))\nSeven(alston) and Wearisome(alston) -> Estrous(alston)\nforall x (Estrous(x) -> Wearisome(x))\nforall x (Confident(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Myoid(x) -> Estrous(x))\n\nWearisome(alston)\n\ntherefore Wearisome(alston)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Missie is vicarious. Missie is not golden. Lory is golden. Lory is apish. Lory is satyric. Lory is afoul. Sumner is vicarious. Sumner is satyric. Sumner is mazed. Sumner is afoul. Meta is not vicarious. Meta is pauline. If something is pauline then it is mazed. If Missie is not vicarious then Missie is golden. Quiet things are satyric. If something is mazed and apish then it is satyric. If Lory is mazed and Lory is apish then Lory is pauline. Green things are apish. All satyric things are afoul. If something is vicarious then it is pauline. Sumner is not afoul.", "logic": "\nVicarious(missie)\nnot Golden(missie)\nGolden(lory)\nApish(lory)\nSatyric(lory)\nAfoul(lory)\nVicarious(sumner)\nSatyric(sumner)\nMazed(sumner)\nAfoul(sumner)\nnot Vicarious(meta)\nPauline(meta)\nforall x (Pauline(x) -> Mazed(x))\nnot Vicarious(missie) -> Golden(missie)\nforall x (Golden(x) -> Satyric(x))\nforall x (Mazed(x) and Apish(x) -> Satyric(x))\nMazed(lory) and Apish(lory) -> Pauline(lory)\nforall x (Pauline(x) -> Apish(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Afoul(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) -> Pauline(x))\n\nnot Afoul(sumner)\n\ntherefore Afoul(sumner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Corny is chivalrous. Corny is not packaged. Mac is packaged. Mac is incidental. Mac is spiritous. Mac is casebook. Krista is chivalrous. Krista is spiritous. Krista is eonian. Krista is casebook. Hercule is not chivalrous. Hercule is dissonant. If something is dissonant then it is eonian. If Corny is not chivalrous then Corny is packaged. Quiet things are spiritous. If something is eonian and incidental then it is spiritous. If Mac is eonian and Mac is incidental then Mac is dissonant. Green things are incidental. All spiritous things are casebook. If something is chivalrous then it is dissonant. Hercule is incidental.", "logic": "\nChivalrous(corny)\nnot Packaged(corny)\nPackaged(mac)\nIncidental(mac)\nSpiritous(mac)\nCasebook(mac)\nChivalrous(krista)\nSpiritous(krista)\nEonian(krista)\nCasebook(krista)\nnot Chivalrous(hercule)\nDissonant(hercule)\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Eonian(x))\nnot Chivalrous(corny) -> Packaged(corny)\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nforall x (Eonian(x) and Incidental(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nEonian(mac) and Incidental(mac) -> Dissonant(mac)\nforall x (Dissonant(x) -> Incidental(x))\nforall x (Spiritous(x) -> Casebook(x))\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) -> Dissonant(x))\n\nIncidental(hercule)\n\nDissonant(hercule) and forall x (Dissonant(x) -> Incidental(x)) -> therefore Incidental(hercule)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Bernie is beautiful. Bernie is not algonquin. Oreste is algonquin. Oreste is idiotic. Oreste is blithe. Oreste is plural. Astra is beautiful. Astra is blithe. Astra is newsless. Astra is plural. Bliss is not beautiful. Bliss is ectodermal. If something is ectodermal then it is newsless. If Bernie is not beautiful then Bernie is algonquin. Quiet things are blithe. If something is newsless and idiotic then it is blithe. If Oreste is newsless and Oreste is idiotic then Oreste is ectodermal. Green things are idiotic. All blithe things are plural. If something is beautiful then it is ectodermal. Astra is not ectodermal.", "logic": "\nBeautiful(bernie)\nnot Algonquin(bernie)\nAlgonquin(oreste)\nIdiotic(oreste)\nBlithe(oreste)\nPlural(oreste)\nBeautiful(astra)\nBlithe(astra)\nNewsless(astra)\nPlural(astra)\nnot Beautiful(bliss)\nEctodermal(bliss)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) -> Newsless(x))\nnot Beautiful(bernie) -> Algonquin(bernie)\nforall x (Algonquin(x) -> Blithe(x))\nforall x (Newsless(x) and Idiotic(x) -> Blithe(x))\nNewsless(oreste) and Idiotic(oreste) -> Ectodermal(oreste)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Plural(x))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\n\nnot Ectodermal(astra)\n\nBeautiful(astra) and forall x (Beautiful(x) -> Ectodermal(x)) -> therefore Ectodermal(astra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Felecia is inert. Felecia is not vermillion. Moyna is vermillion. Moyna is stannous. Moyna is unwashed. Moyna is cloistered. Nahum is inert. Nahum is unwashed. Nahum is tiny. Nahum is cloistered. Peyter is not inert. Peyter is binate. If something is binate then it is tiny. If Felecia is not inert then Felecia is vermillion. Quiet things are unwashed. If something is tiny and stannous then it is unwashed. If Moyna is tiny and Moyna is stannous then Moyna is binate. Green things are stannous. All unwashed things are cloistered. If something is inert then it is binate. Felecia is tiny.", "logic": "\nInert(felecia)\nnot Vermillion(felecia)\nVermillion(moyna)\nStannous(moyna)\nUnwashed(moyna)\nCloistered(moyna)\nInert(nahum)\nUnwashed(nahum)\nTiny(nahum)\nCloistered(nahum)\nnot Inert(peyter)\nBinate(peyter)\nforall x (Binate(x) -> Tiny(x))\nnot Inert(felecia) -> Vermillion(felecia)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Unwashed(x))\nforall x (Tiny(x) and Stannous(x) -> Unwashed(x))\nTiny(moyna) and Stannous(moyna) -> Binate(moyna)\nforall x (Binate(x) -> Stannous(x))\nforall x (Unwashed(x) -> Cloistered(x))\nforall x (Inert(x) -> Binate(x))\n\nTiny(felecia)\n\nInert(felecia) and forall x (Inert(x) -> Binate(x)) -> therefore Binate(felecia) Binate(felecia) and forall x (Binate(x) -> Tiny(x)) -> therefore Tiny(felecia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Adel is perplexed. Adel is not concrete. Doreen is concrete. Doreen is perigonal. Doreen is fearsome. Doreen is schmaltzy. Midge is perplexed. Midge is fearsome. Midge is indistinct. Midge is schmaltzy. Edythe is not perplexed. Edythe is vendable. If something is vendable then it is indistinct. If Adel is not perplexed then Adel is concrete. Quiet things are fearsome. If something is indistinct and perigonal then it is fearsome. If Doreen is indistinct and Doreen is perigonal then Doreen is vendable. Green things are perigonal. All fearsome things are schmaltzy. If something is perplexed then it is vendable. Edythe is not fearsome.", "logic": "\nPerplexed(adel)\nnot Concrete(adel)\nConcrete(doreen)\nPerigonal(doreen)\nFearsome(doreen)\nSchmaltzy(doreen)\nPerplexed(midge)\nFearsome(midge)\nIndistinct(midge)\nSchmaltzy(midge)\nnot Perplexed(edythe)\nVendable(edythe)\nforall x (Vendable(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nnot Perplexed(adel) -> Concrete(adel)\nforall x (Concrete(x) -> Fearsome(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Fearsome(x))\nIndistinct(doreen) and Perigonal(doreen) -> Vendable(doreen)\nforall x (Vendable(x) -> Perigonal(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Schmaltzy(x))\nforall x (Perplexed(x) -> Vendable(x))\n\nnot Fearsome(edythe)\n\nVendable(edythe) and forall x (Vendable(x) -> Indistinct(x)) -> therefore Indistinct(edythe) Vendable(edythe) and forall x (Vendable(x) -> Perigonal(x)) -> therefore Perigonal(edythe) Indistinct(edythe) and Perigonal(edythe) and forall x (Indistinct(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Fearsome(x)) -> therefore Fearsome(edythe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Pace is aldehydic. Pace is not ungrateful. Frederich is ungrateful. Frederich is cotyloidal. Frederich is tiresome. Frederich is ambrosian. Harland is aldehydic. Harland is tiresome. Harland is autistic. Harland is ambrosian. Darda is not aldehydic. Darda is quilted. If something is quilted then it is autistic. If Pace is not aldehydic then Pace is ungrateful. Quiet things are tiresome. If something is autistic and cotyloidal then it is tiresome. If Frederich is autistic and Frederich is cotyloidal then Frederich is quilted. Green things are cotyloidal. All tiresome things are ambrosian. If something is aldehydic then it is quilted. Darda is ambrosian.", "logic": "\nAldehydic(pace)\nnot Ungrateful(pace)\nUngrateful(frederich)\nCotyloidal(frederich)\nTiresome(frederich)\nAmbrosian(frederich)\nAldehydic(harland)\nTiresome(harland)\nAutistic(harland)\nAmbrosian(harland)\nnot Aldehydic(darda)\nQuilted(darda)\nforall x (Quilted(x) -> Autistic(x))\nnot Aldehydic(pace) -> Ungrateful(pace)\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Tiresome(x))\nforall x (Autistic(x) and Cotyloidal(x) -> Tiresome(x))\nAutistic(frederich) and Cotyloidal(frederich) -> Quilted(frederich)\nforall x (Quilted(x) -> Cotyloidal(x))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Aldehydic(x) -> Quilted(x))\n\nAmbrosian(darda)\n\nQuilted(darda) and forall x (Quilted(x) -> Autistic(x)) -> therefore Autistic(darda) Quilted(darda) and forall x (Quilted(x) -> Cotyloidal(x)) -> therefore Cotyloidal(darda) Autistic(darda) and Cotyloidal(darda) and forall x (Autistic(x) and Cotyloidal(x) -> Tiresome(x)) -> therefore Tiresome(darda) Tiresome(darda) and forall x (Tiresome(x) -> Ambrosian(x)) -> therefore Ambrosian(darda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Lidia is justified. Lidia is not cultured. Murial is cultured. Murial is compounded. Murial is balking. Murial is bossy. Arlyne is justified. Arlyne is balking. Arlyne is eritrean. Arlyne is bossy. Richie is not justified. Richie is mass. If something is mass then it is eritrean. If Lidia is not justified then Lidia is cultured. Quiet things are balking. If something is eritrean and compounded then it is balking. If Murial is eritrean and Murial is compounded then Murial is mass. Green things are compounded. All balking things are bossy. If something is justified then it is mass. Lidia is not balking.", "logic": "\nJustified(lidia)\nnot Cultured(lidia)\nCultured(murial)\nCompounded(murial)\nBalking(murial)\nBossy(murial)\nJustified(arlyne)\nBalking(arlyne)\nEritrean(arlyne)\nBossy(arlyne)\nnot Justified(richie)\nMass(richie)\nforall x (Mass(x) -> Eritrean(x))\nnot Justified(lidia) -> Cultured(lidia)\nforall x (Cultured(x) -> Balking(x))\nforall x (Eritrean(x) and Compounded(x) -> Balking(x))\nEritrean(murial) and Compounded(murial) -> Mass(murial)\nforall x (Mass(x) -> Compounded(x))\nforall x (Balking(x) -> Bossy(x))\nforall x (Justified(x) -> Mass(x))\n\nnot Balking(lidia)\n\nJustified(lidia) and forall x (Justified(x) -> Mass(x)) -> therefore Mass(lidia) Mass(lidia) and forall x (Mass(x) -> Eritrean(x)) -> therefore Eritrean(lidia) Justified(lidia) and forall x (Justified(x) -> Mass(x)) -> therefore Mass(lidia) Mass(lidia) and forall x (Mass(x) -> Compounded(x)) -> therefore Compounded(lidia) Eritrean(lidia) and Compounded(lidia) and forall x (Eritrean(x) and Compounded(x) -> Balking(x)) -> therefore Balking(lidia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Katrinka is ellipsoid. Katrinka is not sinistral. Adriane is sinistral. Adriane is forehand. Adriane is catalytic. Adriane is disastrous. Antonius is ellipsoid. Antonius is catalytic. Antonius is hooved. Antonius is disastrous. Dolly is not ellipsoid. Dolly is humpbacked. If something is humpbacked then it is hooved. If Katrinka is not ellipsoid then Katrinka is sinistral. Quiet things are catalytic. If something is hooved and forehand then it is catalytic. If Adriane is hooved and Adriane is forehand then Adriane is humpbacked. Green things are forehand. All catalytic things are disastrous. If something is ellipsoid then it is humpbacked. Adriane is not hooved.", "logic": "\nEllipsoid(katrinka)\nnot Sinistral(katrinka)\nSinistral(adriane)\nForehand(adriane)\nCatalytic(adriane)\nDisastrous(adriane)\nEllipsoid(antonius)\nCatalytic(antonius)\nHooved(antonius)\nDisastrous(antonius)\nnot Ellipsoid(dolly)\nHumpbacked(dolly)\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Hooved(x))\nnot Ellipsoid(katrinka) -> Sinistral(katrinka)\nforall x (Sinistral(x) -> Catalytic(x))\nforall x (Hooved(x) and Forehand(x) -> Catalytic(x))\nHooved(adriane) and Forehand(adriane) -> Humpbacked(adriane)\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Forehand(x))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> Humpbacked(x))\n\nnot Hooved(adriane)\n\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Hooved(x)) <- Hooved(adriane) and Forehand(adriane) -> Humpbacked(adriane) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Stanwood is rosy. Stanwood is not salientian. Luanna is salientian. Luanna is pineal. Luanna is culinary. Luanna is postwar. Anet is rosy. Anet is culinary. Anet is outbound. Anet is postwar. Osbert is not rosy. Osbert is mourning. If something is mourning then it is outbound. If Stanwood is not rosy then Stanwood is salientian. Quiet things are culinary. If something is outbound and pineal then it is culinary. If Luanna is outbound and Luanna is pineal then Luanna is mourning. Green things are pineal. All culinary things are postwar. If something is rosy then it is mourning. Luanna is mourning.", "logic": "\nRosy(stanwood)\nnot Salientian(stanwood)\nSalientian(luanna)\nPineal(luanna)\nCulinary(luanna)\nPostwar(luanna)\nRosy(anet)\nCulinary(anet)\nOutbound(anet)\nPostwar(anet)\nnot Rosy(osbert)\nMourning(osbert)\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Outbound(x))\nnot Rosy(stanwood) -> Salientian(stanwood)\nforall x (Salientian(x) -> Culinary(x))\nforall x (Outbound(x) and Pineal(x) -> Culinary(x))\nOutbound(luanna) and Pineal(luanna) -> Mourning(luanna)\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Pineal(x))\nforall x (Culinary(x) -> Postwar(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) -> Mourning(x))\n\nMourning(luanna)\n\nOutbound(luanna) and Pineal(luanna) -> Mourning(luanna) <- forall x (Mourning(x) -> Outbound(x)) <- forall x (Rosy(x) -> Mourning(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Markus is wordless. Markus is not accustomed. Ulises is accustomed. Ulises is crack. Ulises is bandaged. Ulises is galilean. Amandy is wordless. Amandy is bandaged. Amandy is elysian. Amandy is galilean. Felicio is not wordless. Felicio is reversible. If something is reversible then it is elysian. If Markus is not wordless then Markus is accustomed. Quiet things are bandaged. If something is elysian and crack then it is bandaged. If Ulises is elysian and Ulises is crack then Ulises is reversible. Green things are crack. All bandaged things are galilean. If something is wordless then it is reversible. Ulises is not wordless.", "logic": "\nWordless(markus)\nnot Accustomed(markus)\nAccustomed(ulises)\nCrack(ulises)\nBandaged(ulises)\nGalilean(ulises)\nWordless(amandy)\nBandaged(amandy)\nElysian(amandy)\nGalilean(amandy)\nnot Wordless(felicio)\nReversible(felicio)\nforall x (Reversible(x) -> Elysian(x))\nnot Wordless(markus) -> Accustomed(markus)\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Elysian(x) and Crack(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nElysian(ulises) and Crack(ulises) -> Reversible(ulises)\nforall x (Reversible(x) -> Crack(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Galilean(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Reversible(x))\n\nnot Wordless(ulises)\n\nnot Wordless(ulises) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Adara is urinary. Adara is not thwarting. Sully is thwarting. Sully is bubonic. Sully is featured. Sully is bantering. Tore is urinary. Tore is featured. Tore is derived. Tore is bantering. Sherwynd is not urinary. Sherwynd is autotypic. If something is autotypic then it is derived. If Adara is not urinary then Adara is thwarting. Quiet things are featured. If something is derived and bubonic then it is featured. If Sully is derived and Sully is bubonic then Sully is autotypic. Green things are bubonic. All featured things are bantering. If something is urinary then it is autotypic. Sherwynd is thwarting.", "logic": "\nUrinary(adara)\nnot Thwarting(adara)\nThwarting(sully)\nBubonic(sully)\nFeatured(sully)\nBantering(sully)\nUrinary(tore)\nFeatured(tore)\nDerived(tore)\nBantering(tore)\nnot Urinary(sherwynd)\nAutotypic(sherwynd)\nforall x (Autotypic(x) -> Derived(x))\nnot Urinary(adara) -> Thwarting(adara)\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Featured(x))\nforall x (Derived(x) and Bubonic(x) -> Featured(x))\nDerived(sully) and Bubonic(sully) -> Autotypic(sully)\nforall x (Autotypic(x) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Featured(x) -> Bantering(x))\nforall x (Urinary(x) -> Autotypic(x))\n\nThwarting(sherwynd)\n\nThwarting(sherwynd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Keriann is not undulate. Keriann is crenulate. Keriann is expiable. All fervid things are aurorean. If something is expiable then it is fervid. Nice things are withered. Keriann is not undulate.", "logic": "\nnot Undulate(keriann)\nCrenulate(keriann)\nExpiable(keriann)\nforall x (Fervid(x) -> Aurorean(x))\nforall x (Expiable(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) -> Withered(x))\n\nnot Undulate(keriann)\n\ntherefore not Undulate(keriann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Star is not animist. Star is dappled. Star is upmost. All occidental things are tropical. If something is upmost then it is occidental. Nice things are unrhymed. Star is not upmost.", "logic": "\nnot Animist(star)\nDappled(star)\nUpmost(star)\nforall x (Occidental(x) -> Tropical(x))\nforall x (Upmost(x) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Tropical(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\n\nnot Upmost(star)\n\ntherefore Upmost(star)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Tharen is not narcotic. Tharen is ultimo. Tharen is allelic. All hulky things are masted. If something is allelic then it is hulky. Nice things are choky. Tharen is hulky.", "logic": "\nnot Narcotic(tharen)\nUltimo(tharen)\nAllelic(tharen)\nforall x (Hulky(x) -> Masted(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) -> Hulky(x))\nforall x (Masted(x) -> Choky(x))\n\nHulky(tharen)\n\nAllelic(tharen) and forall x (Allelic(x) -> Hulky(x)) -> therefore Hulky(tharen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Wilburt is not spacious. Wilburt is unmapped. Wilburt is curving. All savourless things are anxious. If something is curving then it is savourless. Nice things are decompound. Wilburt is not savourless.", "logic": "\nnot Spacious(wilburt)\nUnmapped(wilburt)\nCurving(wilburt)\nforall x (Savourless(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Savourless(x))\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Decompound(x))\n\nnot Savourless(wilburt)\n\nCurving(wilburt) and forall x (Curving(x) -> Savourless(x)) -> therefore Savourless(wilburt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Purcell is not aluminous. Purcell is wobbly. Purcell is niggling. All narcotised things are waterborne. If something is niggling then it is narcotised. Nice things are warty. Purcell is waterborne.", "logic": "\nnot Aluminous(purcell)\nWobbly(purcell)\nNiggling(purcell)\nforall x (Narcotised(x) -> Waterborne(x))\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Narcotised(x))\nforall x (Waterborne(x) -> Warty(x))\n\nWaterborne(purcell)\n\nNiggling(purcell) and forall x (Niggling(x) -> Narcotised(x)) -> therefore Narcotised(purcell) Narcotised(purcell) and forall x (Narcotised(x) -> Waterborne(x)) -> therefore Waterborne(purcell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Kathlene is not goaded. Kathlene is sketchy. Kathlene is situated. All pointless things are sabine. If something is situated then it is pointless. Nice things are favored. Kathlene is not sabine.", "logic": "\nnot Goaded(kathlene)\nSketchy(kathlene)\nSituated(kathlene)\nforall x (Pointless(x) -> Sabine(x))\nforall x (Situated(x) -> Pointless(x))\nforall x (Sabine(x) -> Favored(x))\n\nnot Sabine(kathlene)\n\nSituated(kathlene) and forall x (Situated(x) -> Pointless(x)) -> therefore Pointless(kathlene) Pointless(kathlene) and forall x (Pointless(x) -> Sabine(x)) -> therefore Sabine(kathlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Izzy is not cheliceral. Izzy is patient. Izzy is respective. All riled things are monestrous. If something is respective then it is riled. Nice things are identical. Izzy is identical.", "logic": "\nnot Cheliceral(izzy)\nPatient(izzy)\nRespective(izzy)\nforall x (Riled(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Monestrous(x) -> Identical(x))\n\nIdentical(izzy)\n\nRespective(izzy) and forall x (Respective(x) -> Riled(x)) -> therefore Riled(izzy) Riled(izzy) and forall x (Riled(x) -> Monestrous(x)) -> therefore Monestrous(izzy) Monestrous(izzy) and forall x (Monestrous(x) -> Identical(x)) -> therefore Identical(izzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Phillipe is not palish. Phillipe is inductive. Phillipe is iritic. All exonerated things are moonlike. If something is iritic then it is exonerated. Nice things are culpable. Phillipe is not culpable.", "logic": "\nnot Palish(phillipe)\nInductive(phillipe)\nIritic(phillipe)\nforall x (Exonerated(x) -> Moonlike(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Exonerated(x))\nforall x (Moonlike(x) -> Culpable(x))\n\nnot Culpable(phillipe)\n\nIritic(phillipe) and forall x (Iritic(x) -> Exonerated(x)) -> therefore Exonerated(phillipe) Exonerated(phillipe) and forall x (Exonerated(x) -> Moonlike(x)) -> therefore Moonlike(phillipe) Moonlike(phillipe) and forall x (Moonlike(x) -> Culpable(x)) -> therefore Culpable(phillipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Jeffry is translunar. Jeffry is truculent. Jeffry is exempt. Jeffry is leaved. Gertrude is exempt. Zeus is downstream. Zeus is exempt. Cold things are truculent. All exempt things are plowed. All translunar, leaved things are catalatic. If something is truculent and downstream then it is translunar. Blue things are leaved. All exempt things are downstream. If something is truculent and downstream then it is leaved. If something is catalatic and exempt then it is plowed. Jeffry is truculent.", "logic": "\nTranslunar(jeffry)\nTruculent(jeffry)\nExempt(jeffry)\nLeaved(jeffry)\nExempt(gertrude)\nDownstream(zeus)\nExempt(zeus)\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Plowed(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) and Leaved(x) -> Catalatic(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) and Downstream(x) -> Translunar(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Downstream(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) and Downstream(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Catalatic(x) and Exempt(x) -> Plowed(x))\n\nTruculent(jeffry)\n\ntherefore Truculent(jeffry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Ofelia is seeping. Ofelia is dural. Ofelia is drawn. Ofelia is habitable. Shanan is drawn. Riannon is unfretted. Riannon is drawn. Cold things are dural. All drawn things are ictic. All seeping, habitable things are porticoed. If something is dural and unfretted then it is seeping. Blue things are habitable. All drawn things are unfretted. If something is dural and unfretted then it is habitable. If something is porticoed and drawn then it is ictic. Ofelia is not dural.", "logic": "\nSeeping(ofelia)\nDural(ofelia)\nDrawn(ofelia)\nHabitable(ofelia)\nDrawn(shanan)\nUnfretted(riannon)\nDrawn(riannon)\nforall x (Unfretted(x) -> Dural(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Ictic(x))\nforall x (Seeping(x) and Habitable(x) -> Porticoed(x))\nforall x (Dural(x) and Unfretted(x) -> Seeping(x))\nforall x (Dural(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Unfretted(x))\nforall x (Dural(x) and Unfretted(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Porticoed(x) and Drawn(x) -> Ictic(x))\n\nnot Dural(ofelia)\n\ntherefore Dural(ofelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Mercedes is ringed. Mercedes is abkhaz. Mercedes is salving. Mercedes is abstinent. Aldric is salving. Francesco is indigent. Francesco is salving. Cold things are abkhaz. All salving things are defeated. All ringed, abstinent things are cerous. If something is abkhaz and indigent then it is ringed. Blue things are abstinent. All salving things are indigent. If something is abkhaz and indigent then it is abstinent. If something is cerous and salving then it is defeated. Aldric is indigent.", "logic": "\nRinged(mercedes)\nAbkhaz(mercedes)\nSalving(mercedes)\nAbstinent(mercedes)\nSalving(aldric)\nIndigent(francesco)\nSalving(francesco)\nforall x (Indigent(x) -> Abkhaz(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Ringed(x) and Abstinent(x) -> Cerous(x))\nforall x (Abkhaz(x) and Indigent(x) -> Ringed(x))\nforall x (Abkhaz(x) -> Abstinent(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Indigent(x))\nforall x (Abkhaz(x) and Indigent(x) -> Abstinent(x))\nforall x (Cerous(x) and Salving(x) -> Defeated(x))\n\nIndigent(aldric)\n\nSalving(aldric) and forall x (Salving(x) -> Indigent(x)) -> therefore Indigent(aldric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Laurence is sallow. Laurence is moving. Laurence is vixenish. Laurence is wayfaring. Heinz is vixenish. Wenonah is leery. Wenonah is vixenish. Cold things are moving. All vixenish things are cisalpine. All sallow, wayfaring things are boastful. If something is moving and leery then it is sallow. Blue things are wayfaring. All vixenish things are leery. If something is moving and leery then it is wayfaring. If something is boastful and vixenish then it is cisalpine. Laurence is not cisalpine.", "logic": "\nSallow(laurence)\nMoving(laurence)\nVixenish(laurence)\nWayfaring(laurence)\nVixenish(heinz)\nLeery(wenonah)\nVixenish(wenonah)\nforall x (Leery(x) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Sallow(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> Boastful(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) and Leery(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) -> Leery(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) and Leery(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Boastful(x) and Vixenish(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\n\nnot Cisalpine(laurence)\n\nVixenish(laurence) and forall x (Vixenish(x) -> Cisalpine(x)) -> therefore Cisalpine(laurence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Stillman is surrogate. Stillman is unclad. Stillman is ingrown. Stillman is stinky. Eddie is ingrown. Rodger is cranky. Rodger is ingrown. Cold things are unclad. All ingrown things are dorian. All surrogate, stinky things are suitable. If something is unclad and cranky then it is surrogate. Blue things are stinky. All ingrown things are cranky. If something is unclad and cranky then it is stinky. If something is suitable and ingrown then it is dorian. Eddie is unclad.", "logic": "\nSurrogate(stillman)\nUnclad(stillman)\nIngrown(stillman)\nStinky(stillman)\nIngrown(eddie)\nCranky(rodger)\nIngrown(rodger)\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> Unclad(x))\nforall x (Ingrown(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Surrogate(x) and Stinky(x) -> Suitable(x))\nforall x (Unclad(x) and Cranky(x) -> Surrogate(x))\nforall x (Unclad(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Ingrown(x) -> Cranky(x))\nforall x (Unclad(x) and Cranky(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Suitable(x) and Ingrown(x) -> Dorian(x))\n\nUnclad(eddie)\n\nIngrown(eddie) and forall x (Ingrown(x) -> Cranky(x)) -> therefore Cranky(eddie) Cranky(eddie) and forall x (Cranky(x) -> Unclad(x)) -> therefore Unclad(eddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Doralin is ladened. Doralin is payable. Doralin is knackered. Doralin is plumelike. Jocelin is knackered. Gwenn is siberian. Gwenn is knackered. Cold things are payable. All knackered things are sumatran. All ladened, plumelike things are biogenetic. If something is payable and siberian then it is ladened. Blue things are plumelike. All knackered things are siberian. If something is payable and siberian then it is plumelike. If something is biogenetic and knackered then it is sumatran. Gwenn is not plumelike.", "logic": "\nLadened(doralin)\nPayable(doralin)\nKnackered(doralin)\nPlumelike(doralin)\nKnackered(jocelin)\nSiberian(gwenn)\nKnackered(gwenn)\nforall x (Siberian(x) -> Payable(x))\nforall x (Knackered(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nforall x (Ladened(x) and Plumelike(x) -> Biogenetic(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) and Siberian(x) -> Ladened(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Plumelike(x))\nforall x (Knackered(x) -> Siberian(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) and Siberian(x) -> Plumelike(x))\nforall x (Biogenetic(x) and Knackered(x) -> Sumatran(x))\n\nnot Plumelike(gwenn)\n\nSiberian(gwenn) and forall x (Siberian(x) -> Payable(x)) -> therefore Payable(gwenn) Payable(gwenn) and forall x (Payable(x) -> Plumelike(x)) -> therefore Plumelike(gwenn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Gera is wearisome. Gera is humanlike. Gera is entrancing. Gera is west. Roanna is entrancing. Corly is sibylline. Corly is entrancing. Cold things are humanlike. All entrancing things are terefah. All wearisome, west things are impolite. If something is humanlike and sibylline then it is wearisome. Blue things are west. All entrancing things are sibylline. If something is humanlike and sibylline then it is west. If something is impolite and entrancing then it is terefah. Roanna is wearisome.", "logic": "\nWearisome(gera)\nHumanlike(gera)\nEntrancing(gera)\nWest(gera)\nEntrancing(roanna)\nSibylline(corly)\nEntrancing(corly)\nforall x (Sibylline(x) -> Humanlike(x))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) -> Terefah(x))\nforall x (Wearisome(x) and West(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) and Sibylline(x) -> Wearisome(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) -> West(x))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) -> Sibylline(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) and Sibylline(x) -> West(x))\nforall x (Impolite(x) and Entrancing(x) -> Terefah(x))\n\nWearisome(roanna)\n\nEntrancing(roanna) and forall x (Entrancing(x) -> Sibylline(x)) -> therefore Sibylline(roanna) Sibylline(roanna) and forall x (Sibylline(x) -> Humanlike(x)) -> therefore Humanlike(roanna) Entrancing(roanna) and forall x (Entrancing(x) -> Sibylline(x)) -> therefore Sibylline(roanna) Humanlike(roanna) and Sibylline(roanna) and forall x (Humanlike(x) and Sibylline(x) -> Wearisome(x)) -> therefore Wearisome(roanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Con is quickset. Con is rumanian. Con is unbaptized. Con is wobbly. Clinton is unbaptized. Yolanda is missionary. Yolanda is unbaptized. Cold things are rumanian. All unbaptized things are necessary. All quickset, wobbly things are rollicking. If something is rumanian and missionary then it is quickset. Blue things are wobbly. All unbaptized things are missionary. If something is rumanian and missionary then it is wobbly. If something is rollicking and unbaptized then it is necessary. Clinton is not quickset.", "logic": "\nQuickset(con)\nRumanian(con)\nUnbaptized(con)\nWobbly(con)\nUnbaptized(clinton)\nMissionary(yolanda)\nUnbaptized(yolanda)\nforall x (Missionary(x) -> Rumanian(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Necessary(x))\nforall x (Quickset(x) and Wobbly(x) -> Rollicking(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) and Missionary(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) -> Wobbly(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Missionary(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) and Missionary(x) -> Wobbly(x))\nforall x (Rollicking(x) and Unbaptized(x) -> Necessary(x))\n\nnot Quickset(clinton)\n\nUnbaptized(clinton) and forall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Missionary(x)) -> therefore Missionary(clinton) Missionary(clinton) and forall x (Missionary(x) -> Rumanian(x)) -> therefore Rumanian(clinton) Unbaptized(clinton) and forall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Missionary(x)) -> therefore Missionary(clinton) Rumanian(clinton) and Missionary(clinton) and forall x (Rumanian(x) and Missionary(x) -> Quickset(x)) -> therefore Quickset(clinton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "The derron is xcviii. If someone is magical then they are grassless. If someone is xcviii then they are sleek. Rough, sleek people are magical. The derron is xcviii.", "logic": "\nXcviii(derron)\nforall x (Magical(x) -> Grassless(x))\nforall x (Xcviii(x) -> Sleek(x))\nforall x (Xcviii(x) and Sleek(x) -> Magical(x))\n\nXcviii(derron)\n\ntherefore Xcviii(derron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The wright is horrible. If someone is avellane then they are ranked. If someone is horrible then they are bellying. Rough, bellying people are avellane. The wright is not horrible.", "logic": "\nHorrible(wright)\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Ranked(x))\nforall x (Horrible(x) -> Bellying(x))\nforall x (Horrible(x) and Bellying(x) -> Avellane(x))\n\nnot Horrible(wright)\n\ntherefore Horrible(wright)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The clarice is arcane. If someone is monogamous then they are unwomanly. If someone is arcane then they are gauntleted. Rough, gauntleted people are monogamous. The clarice is gauntleted.", "logic": "\nArcane(clarice)\nforall x (Monogamous(x) -> Unwomanly(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) -> Gauntleted(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Gauntleted(x) -> Monogamous(x))\n\nGauntleted(clarice)\n\nArcane(clarice) and forall x (Arcane(x) -> Gauntleted(x)) -> therefore Gauntleted(clarice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The bette is monogynic. If someone is emarginate then they are lupine. If someone is monogynic then they are horrible. Rough, horrible people are emarginate. The bette is not horrible.", "logic": "\nMonogynic(bette)\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) -> Horrible(x))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) and Horrible(x) -> Emarginate(x))\n\nnot Horrible(bette)\n\nMonogynic(bette) and forall x (Monogynic(x) -> Horrible(x)) -> therefore Horrible(bette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The marice is altered. If someone is homocyclic then they are spotted. If someone is altered then they are wimpy. Rough, wimpy people are homocyclic. The marice is homocyclic.", "logic": "\nAltered(marice)\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) -> Spotted(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) and Wimpy(x) -> Homocyclic(x))\n\nHomocyclic(marice)\n\nAltered(marice) and forall x (Altered(x) -> Wimpy(x)) -> therefore Wimpy(marice) Altered(marice) and Wimpy(marice) and forall x (Altered(x) and Wimpy(x) -> Homocyclic(x)) -> therefore Homocyclic(marice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The obadiah is cantering. If someone is spheroidal then they are impending. If someone is cantering then they are basic. Rough, basic people are spheroidal. The obadiah is not spheroidal.", "logic": "\nCantering(obadiah)\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) -> Impending(x))\nforall x (Cantering(x) -> Basic(x))\nforall x (Cantering(x) and Basic(x) -> Spheroidal(x))\n\nnot Spheroidal(obadiah)\n\nCantering(obadiah) and forall x (Cantering(x) -> Basic(x)) -> therefore Basic(obadiah) Cantering(obadiah) and Basic(obadiah) and forall x (Cantering(x) and Basic(x) -> Spheroidal(x)) -> therefore Spheroidal(obadiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The sissie is hogged. If someone is anecdotic then they are sonsie. If someone is hogged then they are starlike. Rough, starlike people are anecdotic. The sissie is sonsie.", "logic": "\nHogged(sissie)\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) -> Starlike(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) and Starlike(x) -> Anecdotic(x))\n\nSonsie(sissie)\n\nHogged(sissie) and forall x (Hogged(x) -> Starlike(x)) -> therefore Starlike(sissie) Hogged(sissie) and Starlike(sissie) and forall x (Hogged(x) and Starlike(x) -> Anecdotic(x)) -> therefore Anecdotic(sissie) Anecdotic(sissie) and forall x (Anecdotic(x) -> Sonsie(x)) -> therefore Sonsie(sissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The lia is unowned. If someone is monstrous then they are petrous. If someone is unowned then they are pyogenic. Rough, pyogenic people are monstrous. The lia is not petrous.", "logic": "\nUnowned(lia)\nforall x (Monstrous(x) -> Petrous(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) -> Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) and Pyogenic(x) -> Monstrous(x))\n\nnot Petrous(lia)\n\nUnowned(lia) and forall x (Unowned(x) -> Pyogenic(x)) -> therefore Pyogenic(lia) Unowned(lia) and Pyogenic(lia) and forall x (Unowned(x) and Pyogenic(x) -> Monstrous(x)) -> therefore Monstrous(lia) Monstrous(lia) and forall x (Monstrous(x) -> Petrous(x)) -> therefore Petrous(lia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The flory is roast. If someone is banded then they are deciphered. If someone is roast then they are okay. Rough, okay people are banded. The flory does not like the flory.", "logic": "\nRoast(flory)\nforall x (Banded(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) -> Okay(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) and Okay(x) -> Banded(x))\n\nnot Likes(flory, flory)\n\nnot Likes(flory, flory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The albertina is heatable. If someone is minute then they are restrained. If someone is heatable then they are unclear. Rough, unclear people are minute. The albertina sees the albertina.", "logic": "\nHeatable(albertina)\nforall x (Minute(x) -> Restrained(x))\nforall x (Heatable(x) -> Unclear(x))\nforall x (Heatable(x) and Unclear(x) -> Minute(x))\n\nSees(albertina, albertina)\n\nSees(albertina, albertina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The perrine is chewy. If someone is triune then they are theatrical. If someone is chewy then they are waggish. Rough, waggish people are triune. The perrine is not round.", "logic": "\nChewy(perrine)\nforall x (Triune(x) -> Theatrical(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) -> Waggish(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) and Waggish(x) -> Triune(x))\n\nnot Round(perrine)\n\nnot Round(perrine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The eolande is firstborn. If someone is bigmouthed then they are soured. If someone is firstborn then they are diminuendo. Rough, diminuendo people are bigmouthed. The eolande visits the eolande.", "logic": "\nFirstborn(eolande)\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Soured(x))\nforall x (Firstborn(x) -> Diminuendo(x))\nforall x (Firstborn(x) and Diminuendo(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\n\nVisits(eolande, eolande)\n\nVisits(eolande, eolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "Valera is libertine. Deeann is snowy. Eduardo is unskilled. Eduardo is snowy. Elora is analogous. Elora is anorectal. Elora is unskilled. Nice, analogous people are anorectal. Nice people are radiating. All analogous, anorectal people are lxxxiv. Kind people are unskilled. Smart, unskilled people are snowy. All radiating people are analogous. All anorectal people are libertine. All lxxxiv people are unskilled. Valera is libertine.", "logic": "\nLibertine(valera)\nSnowy(deeann)\nUnskilled(eduardo)\nSnowy(eduardo)\nAnalogous(elora)\nAnorectal(elora)\nUnskilled(elora)\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) and Analogous(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) -> Radiating(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) and Anorectal(x) -> Lxxxiv(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) -> Unskilled(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Unskilled(x) -> Snowy(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) -> Analogous(x))\nforall x (Anorectal(x) -> Libertine(x))\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) -> Unskilled(x))\n\nLibertine(valera)\n\ntherefore Libertine(valera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Winfield is aphasic. Terza is overaged. Dru is complacent. Dru is overaged. Jaynell is sinewy. Jaynell is unpromised. Jaynell is complacent. Nice, sinewy people are unpromised. Nice people are piano. All sinewy, unpromised people are blanket. Kind people are complacent. Smart, complacent people are overaged. All piano people are sinewy. All unpromised people are aphasic. All blanket people are complacent. Winfield is not aphasic.", "logic": "\nAphasic(winfield)\nOveraged(terza)\nComplacent(dru)\nOveraged(dru)\nSinewy(jaynell)\nUnpromised(jaynell)\nComplacent(jaynell)\nforall x (Blanket(x) and Sinewy(x) -> Unpromised(x))\nforall x (Blanket(x) -> Piano(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Unpromised(x) -> Blanket(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Complacent(x))\nforall x (Piano(x) and Complacent(x) -> Overaged(x))\nforall x (Piano(x) -> Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Unpromised(x) -> Aphasic(x))\nforall x (Blanket(x) -> Complacent(x))\n\nnot Aphasic(winfield)\n\ntherefore Aphasic(winfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Kristyn is nihilistic. Alberta is meshed. Lawton is expiative. Lawton is meshed. Amelia is insistent. Amelia is beaming. Amelia is expiative. Nice, insistent people are beaming. Nice people are imbricate. All insistent, beaming people are asian. Kind people are expiative. Smart, expiative people are meshed. All imbricate people are insistent. All beaming people are nihilistic. All asian people are expiative. Amelia is nihilistic.", "logic": "\nNihilistic(kristyn)\nMeshed(alberta)\nExpiative(lawton)\nMeshed(lawton)\nInsistent(amelia)\nBeaming(amelia)\nExpiative(amelia)\nforall x (Asian(x) and Insistent(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Asian(x) -> Imbricate(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) and Beaming(x) -> Asian(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) -> Expiative(x))\nforall x (Imbricate(x) and Expiative(x) -> Meshed(x))\nforall x (Imbricate(x) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Beaming(x) -> Nihilistic(x))\nforall x (Asian(x) -> Expiative(x))\n\nNihilistic(amelia)\n\nBeaming(amelia) and forall x (Beaming(x) -> Nihilistic(x)) -> therefore Nihilistic(amelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Ewart is conjugal. Edin is ergotropic. Jarrett is onetime. Jarrett is ergotropic. Vannie is prodigal. Vannie is nonfissile. Vannie is onetime. Nice, prodigal people are nonfissile. Nice people are filmed. All prodigal, nonfissile people are nonimmune. Kind people are onetime. Smart, onetime people are ergotropic. All filmed people are prodigal. All nonfissile people are conjugal. All nonimmune people are onetime. Vannie is not nonimmune.", "logic": "\nConjugal(ewart)\nErgotropic(edin)\nOnetime(jarrett)\nErgotropic(jarrett)\nProdigal(vannie)\nNonfissile(vannie)\nOnetime(vannie)\nforall x (Nonimmune(x) and Prodigal(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Nonimmune(x) -> Filmed(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) and Nonfissile(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Onetime(x))\nforall x (Filmed(x) and Onetime(x) -> Ergotropic(x))\nforall x (Filmed(x) -> Prodigal(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Conjugal(x))\nforall x (Nonimmune(x) -> Onetime(x))\n\nnot Nonimmune(vannie)\n\nProdigal(vannie) and Nonfissile(vannie) and forall x (Prodigal(x) and Nonfissile(x) -> Nonimmune(x)) -> therefore Nonimmune(vannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Layney is deskbound. Feodora is succeeding. Aubrie is eviscerate. Aubrie is succeeding. Gayle is demoniac. Gayle is defoliate. Gayle is eviscerate. Nice, demoniac people are defoliate. Nice people are locomotor. All demoniac, defoliate people are languid. Kind people are eviscerate. Smart, eviscerate people are succeeding. All locomotor people are demoniac. All defoliate people are deskbound. All languid people are eviscerate. Gayle is locomotor.", "logic": "\nDeskbound(layney)\nSucceeding(feodora)\nEviscerate(aubrie)\nSucceeding(aubrie)\nDemoniac(gayle)\nDefoliate(gayle)\nEviscerate(gayle)\nforall x (Languid(x) and Demoniac(x) -> Defoliate(x))\nforall x (Languid(x) -> Locomotor(x))\nforall x (Demoniac(x) and Defoliate(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Demoniac(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\nforall x (Locomotor(x) and Eviscerate(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Locomotor(x) -> Demoniac(x))\nforall x (Defoliate(x) -> Deskbound(x))\nforall x (Languid(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\n\nLocomotor(gayle)\n\nDemoniac(gayle) and Defoliate(gayle) and forall x (Demoniac(x) and Defoliate(x) -> Languid(x)) -> therefore Languid(gayle) Languid(gayle) and forall x (Languid(x) -> Locomotor(x)) -> therefore Locomotor(gayle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Wayne is beguiled. Fae is united. Laryssa is xxxi. Laryssa is united. Joye is stopped. Joye is manque. Joye is xxxi. Nice, stopped people are manque. Nice people are devoted. All stopped, manque people are pyrogenic. Kind people are xxxi. Smart, xxxi people are united. All devoted people are stopped. All manque people are beguiled. All pyrogenic people are xxxi. Joye is not devoted.", "logic": "\nBeguiled(wayne)\nUnited(fae)\nXxxi(laryssa)\nUnited(laryssa)\nStopped(joye)\nManque(joye)\nXxxi(joye)\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) and Stopped(x) -> Manque(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) -> Devoted(x))\nforall x (Stopped(x) and Manque(x) -> Pyrogenic(x))\nforall x (Stopped(x) -> Xxxi(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) and Xxxi(x) -> United(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Stopped(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) -> Beguiled(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) -> Xxxi(x))\n\nnot Devoted(joye)\n\nStopped(joye) and Manque(joye) and forall x (Stopped(x) and Manque(x) -> Pyrogenic(x)) -> therefore Pyrogenic(joye) Pyrogenic(joye) and forall x (Pyrogenic(x) -> Devoted(x)) -> therefore Devoted(joye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Esta is massive. Masha is nonionised. Andreas is jurassic. Andreas is nonionised. Myrtle is decayable. Myrtle is melodic. Myrtle is jurassic. Nice, decayable people are melodic. Nice people are amoebic. All decayable, melodic people are snuff. Kind people are jurassic. Smart, jurassic people are nonionised. All amoebic people are decayable. All melodic people are massive. All snuff people are jurassic. Myrtle is nonionised.", "logic": "\nMassive(esta)\nNonionised(masha)\nJurassic(andreas)\nNonionised(andreas)\nDecayable(myrtle)\nMelodic(myrtle)\nJurassic(myrtle)\nforall x (Snuff(x) and Decayable(x) -> Melodic(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Decayable(x) and Melodic(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Decayable(x) -> Jurassic(x))\nforall x (Amoebic(x) and Jurassic(x) -> Nonionised(x))\nforall x (Amoebic(x) -> Decayable(x))\nforall x (Melodic(x) -> Massive(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x) -> Jurassic(x))\n\nNonionised(myrtle)\n\nDecayable(myrtle) and Melodic(myrtle) and forall x (Decayable(x) and Melodic(x) -> Snuff(x)) -> therefore Snuff(myrtle) Snuff(myrtle) and forall x (Snuff(x) -> Amoebic(x)) -> therefore Amoebic(myrtle) Amoebic(myrtle) and Jurassic(myrtle) and forall x (Amoebic(x) and Jurassic(x) -> Nonionised(x)) -> therefore Nonionised(myrtle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Benetta is sonsie. Raye is sightless. Jan is smug. Jan is sightless. Yovonnda is gloomy. Yovonnda is passe. Yovonnda is smug. Nice, gloomy people are passe. Nice people are iffy. All gloomy, passe people are afire. Kind people are smug. Smart, smug people are sightless. All iffy people are gloomy. All passe people are sonsie. All afire people are smug. Yovonnda is not sightless.", "logic": "\nSonsie(benetta)\nSightless(raye)\nSmug(jan)\nSightless(jan)\nGloomy(yovonnda)\nPasse(yovonnda)\nSmug(yovonnda)\nforall x (Afire(x) and Gloomy(x) -> Passe(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Iffy(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and Passe(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> Smug(x))\nforall x (Iffy(x) and Smug(x) -> Sightless(x))\nforall x (Iffy(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Smug(x))\n\nnot Sightless(yovonnda)\n\nGloomy(yovonnda) and Passe(yovonnda) and forall x (Gloomy(x) and Passe(x) -> Afire(x)) -> therefore Afire(yovonnda) Afire(yovonnda) and forall x (Afire(x) -> Iffy(x)) -> therefore Iffy(yovonnda) Iffy(yovonnda) and Smug(yovonnda) and forall x (Iffy(x) and Smug(x) -> Sightless(x)) -> therefore Sightless(yovonnda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Giselle is libidinal. Dari is displeased. Chen is phonic. Chen is displeased. Rosalia is adiabatic. Rosalia is nonhairy. Rosalia is phonic. Nice, adiabatic people are nonhairy. Nice people are bubaline. All adiabatic, nonhairy people are nisi. Kind people are phonic. Smart, phonic people are displeased. All bubaline people are adiabatic. All nonhairy people are libidinal. All nisi people are phonic. Dari is not nonhairy.", "logic": "\nLibidinal(giselle)\nDispleased(dari)\nPhonic(chen)\nDispleased(chen)\nAdiabatic(rosalia)\nNonhairy(rosalia)\nPhonic(rosalia)\nforall x (Nisi(x) and Adiabatic(x) -> Nonhairy(x))\nforall x (Nisi(x) -> Bubaline(x))\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) and Nonhairy(x) -> Nisi(x))\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) -> Phonic(x))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) and Phonic(x) -> Displeased(x))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Libidinal(x))\nforall x (Nisi(x) -> Phonic(x))\n\nnot Nonhairy(dari)\n\nforall x (Nisi(x) and Adiabatic(x) -> Nonhairy(x)) <- forall x (Adiabatic(x) and Nonhairy(x) -> Nisi(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Horst is outlaw. Babette is agonised. Fred is adoptive. Fred is agonised. Hadley is unpillared. Hadley is fugal. Hadley is adoptive. Nice, unpillared people are fugal. Nice people are unsure. All unpillared, fugal people are angelic. Kind people are adoptive. Smart, adoptive people are agonised. All unsure people are unpillared. All fugal people are outlaw. All angelic people are adoptive. Fred is angelic.", "logic": "\nOutlaw(horst)\nAgonised(babette)\nAdoptive(fred)\nAgonised(fred)\nUnpillared(hadley)\nFugal(hadley)\nAdoptive(hadley)\nforall x (Angelic(x) and Unpillared(x) -> Fugal(x))\nforall x (Angelic(x) -> Unsure(x))\nforall x (Unpillared(x) and Fugal(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Unpillared(x) -> Adoptive(x))\nforall x (Unsure(x) and Adoptive(x) -> Agonised(x))\nforall x (Unsure(x) -> Unpillared(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) -> Outlaw(x))\nforall x (Angelic(x) -> Adoptive(x))\n\nAngelic(fred)\n\nforall x (Unpillared(x) and Fugal(x) -> Angelic(x)) <- forall x (Angelic(x) and Unpillared(x) -> Fugal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Rourke is crosswise. Mirilla is clueless. Sallee is clanking. Sallee is clueless. Shantee is sewed. Shantee is pediatric. Shantee is clanking. Nice, sewed people are pediatric. Nice people are teenaged. All sewed, pediatric people are slippered. Kind people are clanking. Smart, clanking people are clueless. All teenaged people are sewed. All pediatric people are crosswise. All slippered people are clanking. Rourke is not pediatric.", "logic": "\nCrosswise(rourke)\nClueless(mirilla)\nClanking(sallee)\nClueless(sallee)\nSewed(shantee)\nPediatric(shantee)\nClanking(shantee)\nforall x (Slippered(x) and Sewed(x) -> Pediatric(x))\nforall x (Slippered(x) -> Teenaged(x))\nforall x (Sewed(x) and Pediatric(x) -> Slippered(x))\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Clanking(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) and Clanking(x) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Sewed(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Crosswise(x))\nforall x (Slippered(x) -> Clanking(x))\n\nnot Pediatric(rourke)\n\nforall x (Slippered(x) and Sewed(x) -> Pediatric(x)) <- forall x (Sewed(x) and Pediatric(x) -> Slippered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Dahlia is limpid. Shelden is bestial. Nestor is illiterate. Nestor is bestial. Rae is crenulate. Rae is italic. Rae is illiterate. Nice, crenulate people are italic. Nice people are tinselly. All crenulate, italic people are ironshod. Kind people are illiterate. Smart, illiterate people are bestial. All tinselly people are crenulate. All italic people are limpid. All ironshod people are illiterate. Dahlia is crenulate.", "logic": "\nLimpid(dahlia)\nBestial(shelden)\nIlliterate(nestor)\nBestial(nestor)\nCrenulate(rae)\nItalic(rae)\nIlliterate(rae)\nforall x (Ironshod(x) and Crenulate(x) -> Italic(x))\nforall x (Ironshod(x) -> Tinselly(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) and Italic(x) -> Ironshod(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Illiterate(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) and Illiterate(x) -> Bestial(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Crenulate(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Limpid(x))\nforall x (Ironshod(x) -> Illiterate(x))\n\nCrenulate(dahlia)\n\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Crenulate(x)) <- forall x (Ironshod(x) -> Tinselly(x)) <- forall x (Crenulate(x) and Italic(x) -> Ironshod(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "The fleur slap the marquita. The fleur is calibrated. The fleur is mesial. The fleur is granted. The fleur is sportive. The fleur rehouse the marquita. The fleur secrete the marquita. The marquita slap the fleur. The marquita is calibrated. The marquita is baccate. The marquita is mesial. The marquita is granted. The marquita is sportive. The marquita rehouse the fleur. The marquita secrete the fleur. If something secrete the marquita then the marquita is sportive. If something is granted then it secrete the fleur. If something is calibrated then it rehouse the fleur. If something is sportive then it rehouse the marquita. If something rehouse the marquita and the marquita is sportive then the marquita secrete the fleur. If something is mesial and it rehouse the fleur then it slap the fleur. Young, baccate things are calibrated. If something slap the fleur then it is baccate. The marquita slap the fleur.", "logic": "\nSlap(fleur, marquita)\nCalibrated(fleur)\nMesial(fleur)\nGranted(fleur)\nSportive(fleur)\nRehouse(fleur, marquita)\nSecrete(fleur, marquita)\nSlap(marquita, fleur)\nCalibrated(marquita)\nBaccate(marquita)\nMesial(marquita)\nGranted(marquita)\nSportive(marquita)\nRehouse(marquita, fleur)\nSecrete(marquita, fleur)\nforall x (Secrete(x, marquita) -> Sportive(marquita))\nforall x (Granted(x) -> Secrete(x, fleur))\nforall x (Calibrated(x) -> Rehouse(x, fleur))\nforall x (Sportive(x) -> Rehouse(x, marquita))\nforall x (Rehouse(x, marquita) and Sportive(marquita) -> Secrete(marquita, fleur))\nforall x (Mesial(x) and Rehouse(x, fleur) -> Slap(x, fleur))\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Baccate(x) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Slap(x, fleur) -> Baccate(x))\n\nSlap(marquita, fleur)\n\ntherefore Slap(marquita, fleur)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The sasha winterise the doug. The sasha is intricate. The sasha is staple. The sasha is hairlike. The sasha is universal. The sasha oyster the doug. The sasha splatter the doug. The doug winterise the sasha. The doug is intricate. The doug is knitted. The doug is staple. The doug is hairlike. The doug is universal. The doug oyster the sasha. The doug splatter the sasha. If something splatter the doug then the doug is universal. If something is hairlike then it splatter the sasha. If something is intricate then it oyster the sasha. If something is universal then it oyster the doug. If something oyster the doug and the doug is universal then the doug splatter the sasha. If something is staple and it oyster the sasha then it winterise the sasha. Young, knitted things are intricate. If something winterise the sasha then it is knitted. The sasha does not need the doug.", "logic": "\nWinterise(sasha, doug)\nIntricate(sasha)\nStaple(sasha)\nHairlike(sasha)\nUniversal(sasha)\nOyster(sasha, doug)\nSplatter(sasha, doug)\nWinterise(doug, sasha)\nIntricate(doug)\nKnitted(doug)\nStaple(doug)\nHairlike(doug)\nUniversal(doug)\nOyster(doug, sasha)\nSplatter(doug, sasha)\nforall x (Splatter(x, doug) -> Universal(doug))\nforall x (Hairlike(x) -> Splatter(x, sasha))\nforall x (Intricate(x) -> Oyster(x, sasha))\nforall x (Universal(x) -> Oyster(x, doug))\nforall x (Oyster(x, doug) and Universal(doug) -> Splatter(doug, sasha))\nforall x (Staple(x) and Oyster(x, sasha) -> Winterise(x, sasha))\nforall x (Universal(x) and Knitted(x) -> Intricate(x))\nforall x (Winterise(x, sasha) -> Knitted(x))\n\nnot Oyster(sasha, doug)\n\ntherefore Oyster(sasha, doug)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The emilie sightsing the florance. The emilie is miscible. The emilie is agrypnotic. The emilie is consenting. The emilie is bastardly. The emilie rabbit the florance. The emilie slake the florance. The florance sightsing the emilie. The florance is miscible. The florance is plenary. The florance is agrypnotic. The florance is consenting. The florance is bastardly. The florance rabbit the emilie. The florance slake the emilie. If something slake the florance then the florance is bastardly. If something is consenting then it slake the emilie. If something is miscible then it rabbit the emilie. If something is bastardly then it rabbit the florance. If something rabbit the florance and the florance is bastardly then the florance slake the emilie. If something is agrypnotic and it rabbit the emilie then it sightsing the emilie. Young, plenary things are miscible. If something sightsing the emilie then it is plenary. The emilie rabbit the emilie.", "logic": "\nSightsing(emilie, florance)\nMiscible(emilie)\nAgrypnotic(emilie)\nConsenting(emilie)\nBastardly(emilie)\nRabbit(emilie, florance)\nSlake(emilie, florance)\nSightsing(florance, emilie)\nMiscible(florance)\nPlenary(florance)\nAgrypnotic(florance)\nConsenting(florance)\nBastardly(florance)\nRabbit(florance, emilie)\nSlake(florance, emilie)\nforall x (Slake(x, florance) -> Bastardly(florance))\nforall x (Consenting(x) -> Slake(x, emilie))\nforall x (Miscible(x) -> Rabbit(x, emilie))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> Rabbit(x, florance))\nforall x (Rabbit(x, florance) and Bastardly(florance) -> Slake(florance, emilie))\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) and Rabbit(x, emilie) -> Sightsing(x, emilie))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Plenary(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, emilie) -> Plenary(x))\n\nRabbit(emilie, emilie)\n\nMiscible(emilie) and forall x (Miscible(x) -> Rabbit(x, emilie)) -> therefore Rabbit(emilie, emilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The tersina rage the winthrop. The tersina is incognito. The tersina is disclosed. The tersina is meritless. The tersina is poetical. The tersina iodise the winthrop. The tersina curtail the winthrop. The winthrop rage the tersina. The winthrop is incognito. The winthrop is gleaming. The winthrop is disclosed. The winthrop is meritless. The winthrop is poetical. The winthrop iodise the tersina. The winthrop curtail the tersina. If something curtail the winthrop then the winthrop is poetical. If something is meritless then it curtail the tersina. If something is incognito then it iodise the tersina. If something is poetical then it iodise the winthrop. If something iodise the winthrop and the winthrop is poetical then the winthrop curtail the tersina. If something is disclosed and it iodise the tersina then it rage the tersina. Young, gleaming things are incognito. If something rage the tersina then it is gleaming. The winthrop does not need the winthrop.", "logic": "\nRage(tersina, winthrop)\nIncognito(tersina)\nDisclosed(tersina)\nMeritless(tersina)\nPoetical(tersina)\nIodise(tersina, winthrop)\nCurtail(tersina, winthrop)\nRage(winthrop, tersina)\nIncognito(winthrop)\nGleaming(winthrop)\nDisclosed(winthrop)\nMeritless(winthrop)\nPoetical(winthrop)\nIodise(winthrop, tersina)\nCurtail(winthrop, tersina)\nforall x (Curtail(x, winthrop) -> Poetical(winthrop))\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Curtail(x, tersina))\nforall x (Incognito(x) -> Iodise(x, tersina))\nforall x (Poetical(x) -> Iodise(x, winthrop))\nforall x (Iodise(x, winthrop) and Poetical(winthrop) -> Curtail(winthrop, tersina))\nforall x (Disclosed(x) and Iodise(x, tersina) -> Rage(x, tersina))\nforall x (Poetical(x) and Gleaming(x) -> Incognito(x))\nforall x (Rage(x, tersina) -> Gleaming(x))\n\nnot Iodise(winthrop, winthrop)\n\nPoetical(winthrop) and forall x (Poetical(x) -> Iodise(x, winthrop)) -> therefore Iodise(winthrop, winthrop)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The yaakov buff the neddy. The yaakov is brainish. The yaakov is healthier. The yaakov is brutish. The yaakov is brunette. The yaakov decrease the neddy. The yaakov inhabit the neddy. The neddy buff the yaakov. The neddy is brainish. The neddy is sacred. The neddy is healthier. The neddy is brutish. The neddy is brunette. The neddy decrease the yaakov. The neddy inhabit the yaakov. If something inhabit the neddy then the neddy is brunette. If something is brutish then it inhabit the yaakov. If something is brainish then it decrease the yaakov. If something is brunette then it decrease the neddy. If something decrease the neddy and the neddy is brunette then the neddy inhabit the yaakov. If something is healthier and it decrease the yaakov then it buff the yaakov. Young, sacred things are brainish. If something buff the yaakov then it is sacred. The yaakov buff the yaakov.", "logic": "\nBuff(yaakov, neddy)\nBrainish(yaakov)\nHealthier(yaakov)\nBrutish(yaakov)\nBrunette(yaakov)\nDecrease(yaakov, neddy)\nInhabit(yaakov, neddy)\nBuff(neddy, yaakov)\nBrainish(neddy)\nSacred(neddy)\nHealthier(neddy)\nBrutish(neddy)\nBrunette(neddy)\nDecrease(neddy, yaakov)\nInhabit(neddy, yaakov)\nforall x (Inhabit(x, neddy) -> Brunette(neddy))\nforall x (Brutish(x) -> Inhabit(x, yaakov))\nforall x (Brainish(x) -> Decrease(x, yaakov))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Decrease(x, neddy))\nforall x (Decrease(x, neddy) and Brunette(neddy) -> Inhabit(neddy, yaakov))\nforall x (Healthier(x) and Decrease(x, yaakov) -> Buff(x, yaakov))\nforall x (Brunette(x) and Sacred(x) -> Brainish(x))\nforall x (Buff(x, yaakov) -> Sacred(x))\n\nBuff(yaakov, yaakov)\n\nBrainish(yaakov) and forall x (Brainish(x) -> Decrease(x, yaakov)) -> therefore Decrease(yaakov, yaakov) Healthier(yaakov) and Decrease(yaakov, yaakov) and forall x (Healthier(x) and Decrease(x, yaakov) -> Buff(x, yaakov)) -> therefore Buff(yaakov, yaakov)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The alissa mosey the delphine. The alissa is doughy. The alissa is chaste. The alissa is capitulary. The alissa is veracious. The alissa itemise the delphine. The alissa clack the delphine. The delphine mosey the alissa. The delphine is doughy. The delphine is tickling. The delphine is chaste. The delphine is capitulary. The delphine is veracious. The delphine itemise the alissa. The delphine clack the alissa. If something clack the delphine then the delphine is veracious. If something is capitulary then it clack the alissa. If something is doughy then it itemise the alissa. If something is veracious then it itemise the delphine. If something itemise the delphine and the delphine is veracious then the delphine clack the alissa. If something is chaste and it itemise the alissa then it mosey the alissa. Young, tickling things are doughy. If something mosey the alissa then it is tickling. The alissa does not chase the alissa.", "logic": "\nMosey(alissa, delphine)\nDoughy(alissa)\nChaste(alissa)\nCapitulary(alissa)\nVeracious(alissa)\nItemise(alissa, delphine)\nClack(alissa, delphine)\nMosey(delphine, alissa)\nDoughy(delphine)\nTickling(delphine)\nChaste(delphine)\nCapitulary(delphine)\nVeracious(delphine)\nItemise(delphine, alissa)\nClack(delphine, alissa)\nforall x (Clack(x, delphine) -> Veracious(delphine))\nforall x (Capitulary(x) -> Clack(x, alissa))\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Itemise(x, alissa))\nforall x (Veracious(x) -> Itemise(x, delphine))\nforall x (Itemise(x, delphine) and Veracious(delphine) -> Clack(delphine, alissa))\nforall x (Chaste(x) and Itemise(x, alissa) -> Mosey(x, alissa))\nforall x (Veracious(x) and Tickling(x) -> Doughy(x))\nforall x (Mosey(x, alissa) -> Tickling(x))\n\nnot Mosey(alissa, alissa)\n\nDoughy(alissa) and forall x (Doughy(x) -> Itemise(x, alissa)) -> therefore Itemise(alissa, alissa) Chaste(alissa) and Itemise(alissa, alissa) and forall x (Chaste(x) and Itemise(x, alissa) -> Mosey(x, alissa)) -> therefore Mosey(alissa, alissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The shorty moon the lilian. The shorty is antitrust. The shorty is bipartite. The shorty is cymose. The shorty is salverform. The shorty raven the lilian. The shorty besiege the lilian. The lilian moon the shorty. The lilian is antitrust. The lilian is placoid. The lilian is bipartite. The lilian is cymose. The lilian is salverform. The lilian raven the shorty. The lilian besiege the shorty. If something besiege the lilian then the lilian is salverform. If something is cymose then it besiege the shorty. If something is antitrust then it raven the shorty. If something is salverform then it raven the lilian. If something raven the lilian and the lilian is salverform then the lilian besiege the shorty. If something is bipartite and it raven the shorty then it moon the shorty. Young, placoid things are antitrust. If something moon the shorty then it is placoid. The shorty is placoid.", "logic": "\nMoon(shorty, lilian)\nAntitrust(shorty)\nBipartite(shorty)\nCymose(shorty)\nSalverform(shorty)\nRaven(shorty, lilian)\nBesiege(shorty, lilian)\nMoon(lilian, shorty)\nAntitrust(lilian)\nPlacoid(lilian)\nBipartite(lilian)\nCymose(lilian)\nSalverform(lilian)\nRaven(lilian, shorty)\nBesiege(lilian, shorty)\nforall x (Besiege(x, lilian) -> Salverform(lilian))\nforall x (Cymose(x) -> Besiege(x, shorty))\nforall x (Antitrust(x) -> Raven(x, shorty))\nforall x (Salverform(x) -> Raven(x, lilian))\nforall x (Raven(x, lilian) and Salverform(lilian) -> Besiege(lilian, shorty))\nforall x (Bipartite(x) and Raven(x, shorty) -> Moon(x, shorty))\nforall x (Salverform(x) and Placoid(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nforall x (Moon(x, shorty) -> Placoid(x))\n\nPlacoid(shorty)\n\nAntitrust(shorty) and forall x (Antitrust(x) -> Raven(x, shorty)) -> therefore Raven(shorty, shorty) Bipartite(shorty) and Raven(shorty, shorty) and forall x (Bipartite(x) and Raven(x, shorty) -> Moon(x, shorty)) -> therefore Moon(shorty, shorty) Moon(shorty, shorty) and forall x (Moon(x, shorty) -> Placoid(x)) -> therefore Placoid(shorty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The reiko lollop the chen. The reiko is impelling. The reiko is shaping. The reiko is dripless. The reiko is heraldic. The reiko immure the chen. The reiko metricize the chen. The chen lollop the reiko. The chen is impelling. The chen is untoward. The chen is shaping. The chen is dripless. The chen is heraldic. The chen immure the reiko. The chen metricize the reiko. If something metricize the chen then the chen is heraldic. If something is dripless then it metricize the reiko. If something is impelling then it immure the reiko. If something is heraldic then it immure the chen. If something immure the chen and the chen is heraldic then the chen metricize the reiko. If something is shaping and it immure the reiko then it lollop the reiko. Young, untoward things are impelling. If something lollop the reiko then it is untoward. The reiko is not untoward.", "logic": "\nLollop(reiko, chen)\nImpelling(reiko)\nShaping(reiko)\nDripless(reiko)\nHeraldic(reiko)\nImmure(reiko, chen)\nMetricize(reiko, chen)\nLollop(chen, reiko)\nImpelling(chen)\nUntoward(chen)\nShaping(chen)\nDripless(chen)\nHeraldic(chen)\nImmure(chen, reiko)\nMetricize(chen, reiko)\nforall x (Metricize(x, chen) -> Heraldic(chen))\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Metricize(x, reiko))\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> Immure(x, reiko))\nforall x (Heraldic(x) -> Immure(x, chen))\nforall x (Immure(x, chen) and Heraldic(chen) -> Metricize(chen, reiko))\nforall x (Shaping(x) and Immure(x, reiko) -> Lollop(x, reiko))\nforall x (Heraldic(x) and Untoward(x) -> Impelling(x))\nforall x (Lollop(x, reiko) -> Untoward(x))\n\nnot Untoward(reiko)\n\nImpelling(reiko) and forall x (Impelling(x) -> Immure(x, reiko)) -> therefore Immure(reiko, reiko) Shaping(reiko) and Immure(reiko, reiko) and forall x (Shaping(x) and Immure(x, reiko) -> Lollop(x, reiko)) -> therefore Lollop(reiko, reiko) Lollop(reiko, reiko) and forall x (Lollop(x, reiko) -> Untoward(x)) -> therefore Untoward(reiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The mella draw the onlea. The mella is mousey. The mella is vulturous. The mella is failing. The mella is spread. The mella abominate the onlea. The mella dress the onlea. The onlea draw the mella. The onlea is mousey. The onlea is tiddly. The onlea is vulturous. The onlea is failing. The onlea is spread. The onlea abominate the mella. The onlea dress the mella. If something dress the onlea then the onlea is spread. If something is failing then it dress the mella. If something is mousey then it abominate the mella. If something is spread then it abominate the onlea. If something abominate the onlea and the onlea is spread then the onlea dress the mella. If something is vulturous and it abominate the mella then it draw the mella. Young, tiddly things are mousey. If something draw the mella then it is tiddly. The onlea does not chase the onlea.", "logic": "\nDraw(mella, onlea)\nMousey(mella)\nVulturous(mella)\nFailing(mella)\nSpread(mella)\nAbominate(mella, onlea)\nDress(mella, onlea)\nDraw(onlea, mella)\nMousey(onlea)\nTiddly(onlea)\nVulturous(onlea)\nFailing(onlea)\nSpread(onlea)\nAbominate(onlea, mella)\nDress(onlea, mella)\nforall x (Dress(x, onlea) -> Spread(onlea))\nforall x (Failing(x) -> Dress(x, mella))\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Abominate(x, mella))\nforall x (Spread(x) -> Abominate(x, onlea))\nforall x (Abominate(x, onlea) and Spread(onlea) -> Dress(onlea, mella))\nforall x (Vulturous(x) and Abominate(x, mella) -> Draw(x, mella))\nforall x (Spread(x) and Tiddly(x) -> Mousey(x))\nforall x (Draw(x, mella) -> Tiddly(x))\n\nnot Draw(onlea, onlea)\n\nnot Draw(onlea, onlea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The mitch input the cara. The mitch is famed. The mitch is unripe. The mitch is dianoetic. The mitch is tempering. The mitch fructify the cara. The mitch mail the cara. The cara input the mitch. The cara is famed. The cara is correct. The cara is unripe. The cara is dianoetic. The cara is tempering. The cara fructify the mitch. The cara mail the mitch. If something mail the cara then the cara is tempering. If something is dianoetic then it mail the mitch. If something is famed then it fructify the mitch. If something is tempering then it fructify the cara. If something fructify the cara and the cara is tempering then the cara mail the mitch. If something is unripe and it fructify the mitch then it input the mitch. Young, correct things are famed. If something input the mitch then it is correct. The cara mail the cara.", "logic": "\nInput(mitch, cara)\nFamed(mitch)\nUnripe(mitch)\nDianoetic(mitch)\nTempering(mitch)\nFructify(mitch, cara)\nMail(mitch, cara)\nInput(cara, mitch)\nFamed(cara)\nCorrect(cara)\nUnripe(cara)\nDianoetic(cara)\nTempering(cara)\nFructify(cara, mitch)\nMail(cara, mitch)\nforall x (Mail(x, cara) -> Tempering(cara))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) -> Mail(x, mitch))\nforall x (Famed(x) -> Fructify(x, mitch))\nforall x (Tempering(x) -> Fructify(x, cara))\nforall x (Fructify(x, cara) and Tempering(cara) -> Mail(cara, mitch))\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Fructify(x, mitch) -> Input(x, mitch))\nforall x (Tempering(x) and Correct(x) -> Famed(x))\nforall x (Input(x, mitch) -> Correct(x))\n\nMail(cara, cara)\n\nMail(cara, cara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The marget part the rik. The marget blub the rik. The marget is ruby. The marget is apopemptic. The marget is aortal. The marget is veinal. The marget mist the rik. The rik part the marget. The rik blub the marget. The rik is ruby. The rik is apopemptic. The rik is spirant. The rik is aortal. The rik is veinal. The rik mist the marget. If something part the rik then it blub the rik. If something mist the rik and the rik is spirant then it part the rik. If the marget blub the rik and the rik is aortal then the rik blub the marget. If something is ruby then it part the rik. If something blub the rik then it mist the rik. If the rik part the marget and the marget is veinal then the rik is aortal. The marget blub the rik.", "logic": "\nPart(marget, rik)\nBlub(marget, rik)\nRuby(marget)\nApopemptic(marget)\nAortal(marget)\nVeinal(marget)\nMist(marget, rik)\nPart(rik, marget)\nBlub(rik, marget)\nRuby(rik)\nApopemptic(rik)\nSpirant(rik)\nAortal(rik)\nVeinal(rik)\nMist(rik, marget)\nforall x (Part(x, rik) -> Blub(x, rik))\nforall x (Mist(x, rik) and Spirant(rik) -> Part(x, rik))\nBlub(marget, rik) and Aortal(rik) -> Blub(rik, marget)\nforall x (Ruby(x) -> Part(x, rik))\nforall x (Blub(x, rik) -> Mist(x, rik))\nPart(rik, marget) and Veinal(marget) -> Aortal(rik)\n\nBlub(marget, rik)\n\ntherefore Blub(marget, rik)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The chandra stutter the delinda. The chandra backstop the delinda. The chandra is chorionic. The chandra is antithetic. The chandra is amenable. The chandra is faceted. The chandra code the delinda. The delinda stutter the chandra. The delinda backstop the chandra. The delinda is chorionic. The delinda is antithetic. The delinda is floppy. The delinda is amenable. The delinda is faceted. The delinda code the chandra. If something stutter the delinda then it backstop the delinda. If something code the delinda and the delinda is floppy then it stutter the delinda. If the chandra backstop the delinda and the delinda is amenable then the delinda backstop the chandra. If something is chorionic then it stutter the delinda. If something backstop the delinda then it code the delinda. If the delinda stutter the chandra and the chandra is faceted then the delinda is amenable. The delinda does not like the chandra.", "logic": "\nStutter(chandra, delinda)\nBackstop(chandra, delinda)\nChorionic(chandra)\nAntithetic(chandra)\nAmenable(chandra)\nFaceted(chandra)\nCode(chandra, delinda)\nStutter(delinda, chandra)\nBackstop(delinda, chandra)\nChorionic(delinda)\nAntithetic(delinda)\nFloppy(delinda)\nAmenable(delinda)\nFaceted(delinda)\nCode(delinda, chandra)\nforall x (Stutter(x, delinda) -> Backstop(x, delinda))\nforall x (Code(x, delinda) and Floppy(delinda) -> Stutter(x, delinda))\nBackstop(chandra, delinda) and Amenable(delinda) -> Backstop(delinda, chandra)\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Stutter(x, delinda))\nforall x (Backstop(x, delinda) -> Code(x, delinda))\nStutter(delinda, chandra) and Faceted(chandra) -> Amenable(delinda)\n\nnot Code(delinda, chandra)\n\ntherefore Code(delinda, chandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The bentley fade the giacomo. The bentley vilify the giacomo. The bentley is bregmatic. The bentley is rarified. The bentley is glorious. The bentley is owned. The bentley animate the giacomo. The giacomo fade the bentley. The giacomo vilify the bentley. The giacomo is bregmatic. The giacomo is rarified. The giacomo is syndetic. The giacomo is glorious. The giacomo is owned. The giacomo animate the bentley. If something fade the giacomo then it vilify the giacomo. If something animate the giacomo and the giacomo is syndetic then it fade the giacomo. If the bentley vilify the giacomo and the giacomo is glorious then the giacomo vilify the bentley. If something is bregmatic then it fade the giacomo. If something vilify the giacomo then it animate the giacomo. If the giacomo fade the bentley and the bentley is owned then the giacomo is glorious. The giacomo fade the giacomo.", "logic": "\nFade(bentley, giacomo)\nVilify(bentley, giacomo)\nBregmatic(bentley)\nRarified(bentley)\nGlorious(bentley)\nOwned(bentley)\nAnimate(bentley, giacomo)\nFade(giacomo, bentley)\nVilify(giacomo, bentley)\nBregmatic(giacomo)\nRarified(giacomo)\nSyndetic(giacomo)\nGlorious(giacomo)\nOwned(giacomo)\nAnimate(giacomo, bentley)\nforall x (Fade(x, giacomo) -> Vilify(x, giacomo))\nforall x (Animate(x, giacomo) and Syndetic(giacomo) -> Fade(x, giacomo))\nVilify(bentley, giacomo) and Glorious(giacomo) -> Vilify(giacomo, bentley)\nforall x (Bregmatic(x) -> Fade(x, giacomo))\nforall x (Vilify(x, giacomo) -> Animate(x, giacomo))\nFade(giacomo, bentley) and Owned(bentley) -> Glorious(giacomo)\n\nFade(giacomo, giacomo)\n\nBregmatic(giacomo) and forall x (Bregmatic(x) -> Fade(x, giacomo)) -> therefore Fade(giacomo, giacomo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The manuel disband the camellia. The manuel muffle the camellia. The manuel is effortful. The manuel is rentable. The manuel is verrucose. The manuel is cycloidal. The manuel ululate the camellia. The camellia disband the manuel. The camellia muffle the manuel. The camellia is effortful. The camellia is rentable. The camellia is liii. The camellia is verrucose. The camellia is cycloidal. The camellia ululate the manuel. If something disband the camellia then it muffle the camellia. If something ululate the camellia and the camellia is liii then it disband the camellia. If the manuel muffle the camellia and the camellia is verrucose then the camellia muffle the manuel. If something is effortful then it disband the camellia. If something muffle the camellia then it ululate the camellia. If the camellia disband the manuel and the manuel is cycloidal then the camellia is verrucose. The camellia does not chase the camellia.", "logic": "\nDisband(manuel, camellia)\nMuffle(manuel, camellia)\nEffortful(manuel)\nRentable(manuel)\nVerrucose(manuel)\nCycloidal(manuel)\nUlulate(manuel, camellia)\nDisband(camellia, manuel)\nMuffle(camellia, manuel)\nEffortful(camellia)\nRentable(camellia)\nLiii(camellia)\nVerrucose(camellia)\nCycloidal(camellia)\nUlulate(camellia, manuel)\nforall x (Disband(x, camellia) -> Muffle(x, camellia))\nforall x (Ululate(x, camellia) and Liii(camellia) -> Disband(x, camellia))\nMuffle(manuel, camellia) and Verrucose(camellia) -> Muffle(camellia, manuel)\nforall x (Effortful(x) -> Disband(x, camellia))\nforall x (Muffle(x, camellia) -> Ululate(x, camellia))\nDisband(camellia, manuel) and Cycloidal(manuel) -> Verrucose(camellia)\n\nnot Disband(camellia, camellia)\n\nEffortful(camellia) and forall x (Effortful(x) -> Disband(x, camellia)) -> therefore Disband(camellia, camellia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The hilton abdicate the floria. The hilton align the floria. The hilton is millionth. The hilton is sotho. The hilton is swedish. The hilton is terrified. The hilton dismantle the floria. The floria abdicate the hilton. The floria align the hilton. The floria is millionth. The floria is sotho. The floria is execrable. The floria is swedish. The floria is terrified. The floria dismantle the hilton. If something abdicate the floria then it align the floria. If something dismantle the floria and the floria is execrable then it abdicate the floria. If the hilton align the floria and the floria is swedish then the floria align the hilton. If something is millionth then it abdicate the floria. If something align the floria then it dismantle the floria. If the floria abdicate the hilton and the hilton is terrified then the floria is swedish. The floria align the floria.", "logic": "\nAbdicate(hilton, floria)\nAlign(hilton, floria)\nMillionth(hilton)\nSotho(hilton)\nSwedish(hilton)\nTerrified(hilton)\nDismantle(hilton, floria)\nAbdicate(floria, hilton)\nAlign(floria, hilton)\nMillionth(floria)\nSotho(floria)\nExecrable(floria)\nSwedish(floria)\nTerrified(floria)\nDismantle(floria, hilton)\nforall x (Abdicate(x, floria) -> Align(x, floria))\nforall x (Dismantle(x, floria) and Execrable(floria) -> Abdicate(x, floria))\nAlign(hilton, floria) and Swedish(floria) -> Align(floria, hilton)\nforall x (Millionth(x) -> Abdicate(x, floria))\nforall x (Align(x, floria) -> Dismantle(x, floria))\nAbdicate(floria, hilton) and Terrified(hilton) -> Swedish(floria)\n\nAlign(floria, floria)\n\nMillionth(floria) and forall x (Millionth(x) -> Abdicate(x, floria)) -> therefore Abdicate(floria, floria) Abdicate(floria, floria) and forall x (Abdicate(x, floria) -> Align(x, floria)) -> therefore Align(floria, floria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The socrates figure the lorry. The socrates wassail the lorry. The socrates is taoist. The socrates is nosocomial. The socrates is unconfused. The socrates is mechanic. The socrates aromatize the lorry. The lorry figure the socrates. The lorry wassail the socrates. The lorry is taoist. The lorry is nosocomial. The lorry is morose. The lorry is unconfused. The lorry is mechanic. The lorry aromatize the socrates. If something figure the lorry then it wassail the lorry. If something aromatize the lorry and the lorry is morose then it figure the lorry. If the socrates wassail the lorry and the lorry is unconfused then the lorry wassail the socrates. If something is taoist then it figure the lorry. If something wassail the lorry then it aromatize the lorry. If the lorry figure the socrates and the socrates is mechanic then the lorry is unconfused. The lorry does not eat the lorry.", "logic": "\nFigure(socrates, lorry)\nWassail(socrates, lorry)\nTaoist(socrates)\nNosocomial(socrates)\nUnconfused(socrates)\nMechanic(socrates)\nAromatize(socrates, lorry)\nFigure(lorry, socrates)\nWassail(lorry, socrates)\nTaoist(lorry)\nNosocomial(lorry)\nMorose(lorry)\nUnconfused(lorry)\nMechanic(lorry)\nAromatize(lorry, socrates)\nforall x (Figure(x, lorry) -> Wassail(x, lorry))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, lorry) and Morose(lorry) -> Figure(x, lorry))\nWassail(socrates, lorry) and Unconfused(lorry) -> Wassail(lorry, socrates)\nforall x (Taoist(x) -> Figure(x, lorry))\nforall x (Wassail(x, lorry) -> Aromatize(x, lorry))\nFigure(lorry, socrates) and Mechanic(socrates) -> Unconfused(lorry)\n\nnot Wassail(lorry, lorry)\n\nTaoist(lorry) and forall x (Taoist(x) -> Figure(x, lorry)) -> therefore Figure(lorry, lorry) Figure(lorry, lorry) and forall x (Figure(x, lorry) -> Wassail(x, lorry)) -> therefore Wassail(lorry, lorry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The anton unravel the rajeev. The anton idle the rajeev. The anton is idolised. The anton is vital. The anton is unlamented. The anton is wretched. The anton elevate the rajeev. The rajeev unravel the anton. The rajeev idle the anton. The rajeev is idolised. The rajeev is vital. The rajeev is unremarked. The rajeev is unlamented. The rajeev is wretched. The rajeev elevate the anton. If something unravel the rajeev then it idle the rajeev. If something elevate the rajeev and the rajeev is unremarked then it unravel the rajeev. If the anton idle the rajeev and the rajeev is unlamented then the rajeev idle the anton. If something is idolised then it unravel the rajeev. If something idle the rajeev then it elevate the rajeev. If the rajeev unravel the anton and the anton is wretched then the rajeev is unlamented. The rajeev elevate the rajeev.", "logic": "\nUnravel(anton, rajeev)\nIdle(anton, rajeev)\nIdolised(anton)\nVital(anton)\nUnlamented(anton)\nWretched(anton)\nElevate(anton, rajeev)\nUnravel(rajeev, anton)\nIdle(rajeev, anton)\nIdolised(rajeev)\nVital(rajeev)\nUnremarked(rajeev)\nUnlamented(rajeev)\nWretched(rajeev)\nElevate(rajeev, anton)\nforall x (Unravel(x, rajeev) -> Idle(x, rajeev))\nforall x (Elevate(x, rajeev) and Unremarked(rajeev) -> Unravel(x, rajeev))\nIdle(anton, rajeev) and Unlamented(rajeev) -> Idle(rajeev, anton)\nforall x (Idolised(x) -> Unravel(x, rajeev))\nforall x (Idle(x, rajeev) -> Elevate(x, rajeev))\nUnravel(rajeev, anton) and Wretched(anton) -> Unlamented(rajeev)\n\nElevate(rajeev, rajeev)\n\nIdolised(rajeev) and forall x (Idolised(x) -> Unravel(x, rajeev)) -> therefore Unravel(rajeev, rajeev) Unravel(rajeev, rajeev) and forall x (Unravel(x, rajeev) -> Idle(x, rajeev)) -> therefore Idle(rajeev, rajeev) Idle(rajeev, rajeev) and forall x (Idle(x, rajeev) -> Elevate(x, rajeev)) -> therefore Elevate(rajeev, rajeev)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The suzi archaize the mareah. The suzi lour the mareah. The suzi is salvific. The suzi is seamed. The suzi is pedate. The suzi is collateral. The suzi trivialize the mareah. The mareah archaize the suzi. The mareah lour the suzi. The mareah is salvific. The mareah is seamed. The mareah is nonfissile. The mareah is pedate. The mareah is collateral. The mareah trivialize the suzi. If something archaize the mareah then it lour the mareah. If something trivialize the mareah and the mareah is nonfissile then it archaize the mareah. If the suzi lour the mareah and the mareah is pedate then the mareah lour the suzi. If something is salvific then it archaize the mareah. If something lour the mareah then it trivialize the mareah. If the mareah archaize the suzi and the suzi is collateral then the mareah is pedate. The mareah does not like the mareah.", "logic": "\nArchaize(suzi, mareah)\nLour(suzi, mareah)\nSalvific(suzi)\nSeamed(suzi)\nPedate(suzi)\nCollateral(suzi)\nTrivialize(suzi, mareah)\nArchaize(mareah, suzi)\nLour(mareah, suzi)\nSalvific(mareah)\nSeamed(mareah)\nNonfissile(mareah)\nPedate(mareah)\nCollateral(mareah)\nTrivialize(mareah, suzi)\nforall x (Archaize(x, mareah) -> Lour(x, mareah))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, mareah) and Nonfissile(mareah) -> Archaize(x, mareah))\nLour(suzi, mareah) and Pedate(mareah) -> Lour(mareah, suzi)\nforall x (Salvific(x) -> Archaize(x, mareah))\nforall x (Lour(x, mareah) -> Trivialize(x, mareah))\nArchaize(mareah, suzi) and Collateral(suzi) -> Pedate(mareah)\n\nnot Trivialize(mareah, mareah)\n\nSalvific(mareah) and forall x (Salvific(x) -> Archaize(x, mareah)) -> therefore Archaize(mareah, mareah) Archaize(mareah, mareah) and forall x (Archaize(x, mareah) -> Lour(x, mareah)) -> therefore Lour(mareah, mareah) Lour(mareah, mareah) and forall x (Lour(x, mareah) -> Trivialize(x, mareah)) -> therefore Trivialize(mareah, mareah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The donella pouch the doreen. The donella nominate the doreen. The donella is bratty. The donella is widespread. The donella is digressive. The donella is forgiving. The donella undermine the doreen. The doreen pouch the donella. The doreen nominate the donella. The doreen is bratty. The doreen is widespread. The doreen is volcanic. The doreen is digressive. The doreen is forgiving. The doreen undermine the donella. If something pouch the doreen then it nominate the doreen. If something undermine the doreen and the doreen is volcanic then it pouch the doreen. If the donella nominate the doreen and the doreen is digressive then the doreen nominate the donella. If something is bratty then it pouch the doreen. If something nominate the doreen then it undermine the doreen. If the doreen pouch the donella and the donella is forgiving then the doreen is digressive. The donella does not eat the donella.", "logic": "\nPouch(donella, doreen)\nNominate(donella, doreen)\nBratty(donella)\nWidespread(donella)\nDigressive(donella)\nForgiving(donella)\nUndermine(donella, doreen)\nPouch(doreen, donella)\nNominate(doreen, donella)\nBratty(doreen)\nWidespread(doreen)\nVolcanic(doreen)\nDigressive(doreen)\nForgiving(doreen)\nUndermine(doreen, donella)\nforall x (Pouch(x, doreen) -> Nominate(x, doreen))\nforall x (Undermine(x, doreen) and Volcanic(doreen) -> Pouch(x, doreen))\nNominate(donella, doreen) and Digressive(doreen) -> Nominate(doreen, donella)\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Pouch(x, doreen))\nforall x (Nominate(x, doreen) -> Undermine(x, doreen))\nPouch(doreen, donella) and Forgiving(donella) -> Digressive(doreen)\n\nnot Nominate(donella, donella)\n\nnot Nominate(donella, donella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The jose reprimand the suzy. The jose dangle the suzy. The jose is unpillared. The jose is airborne. The jose is crusty. The jose is lucrative. The jose trundle the suzy. The suzy reprimand the jose. The suzy dangle the jose. The suzy is unpillared. The suzy is airborne. The suzy is long. The suzy is crusty. The suzy is lucrative. The suzy trundle the jose. If something reprimand the suzy then it dangle the suzy. If something trundle the suzy and the suzy is long then it reprimand the suzy. If the jose dangle the suzy and the suzy is crusty then the suzy dangle the jose. If something is unpillared then it reprimand the suzy. If something dangle the suzy then it trundle the suzy. If the suzy reprimand the jose and the jose is lucrative then the suzy is crusty. The jose is long.", "logic": "\nReprimand(jose, suzy)\nDangle(jose, suzy)\nUnpillared(jose)\nAirborne(jose)\nCrusty(jose)\nLucrative(jose)\nTrundle(jose, suzy)\nReprimand(suzy, jose)\nDangle(suzy, jose)\nUnpillared(suzy)\nAirborne(suzy)\nLong(suzy)\nCrusty(suzy)\nLucrative(suzy)\nTrundle(suzy, jose)\nforall x (Reprimand(x, suzy) -> Dangle(x, suzy))\nforall x (Trundle(x, suzy) and Long(suzy) -> Reprimand(x, suzy))\nDangle(jose, suzy) and Crusty(suzy) -> Dangle(suzy, jose)\nforall x (Unpillared(x) -> Reprimand(x, suzy))\nforall x (Dangle(x, suzy) -> Trundle(x, suzy))\nReprimand(suzy, jose) and Lucrative(jose) -> Crusty(suzy)\n\nLong(jose)\n\nLong(jose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The trey carmine the nanete. The trey cloak the nanete. The trey is complete. The trey is brahminic. The trey is mannerly. The trey is relentless. The trey quiet the nanete. The nanete carmine the trey. The nanete cloak the trey. The nanete is complete. The nanete is brahminic. The nanete is thirtieth. The nanete is mannerly. The nanete is relentless. The nanete quiet the trey. If something carmine the nanete then it cloak the nanete. If something quiet the nanete and the nanete is thirtieth then it carmine the nanete. If the trey cloak the nanete and the nanete is mannerly then the nanete cloak the trey. If something is complete then it carmine the nanete. If something cloak the nanete then it quiet the nanete. If the nanete carmine the trey and the trey is relentless then the nanete is mannerly. The trey does not chase the trey.", "logic": "\nCarmine(trey, nanete)\nCloak(trey, nanete)\nComplete(trey)\nBrahminic(trey)\nMannerly(trey)\nRelentless(trey)\nQuiet(trey, nanete)\nCarmine(nanete, trey)\nCloak(nanete, trey)\nComplete(nanete)\nBrahminic(nanete)\nThirtieth(nanete)\nMannerly(nanete)\nRelentless(nanete)\nQuiet(nanete, trey)\nforall x (Carmine(x, nanete) -> Cloak(x, nanete))\nforall x (Quiet(x, nanete) and Thirtieth(nanete) -> Carmine(x, nanete))\nCloak(trey, nanete) and Mannerly(nanete) -> Cloak(nanete, trey)\nforall x (Complete(x) -> Carmine(x, nanete))\nforall x (Cloak(x, nanete) -> Quiet(x, nanete))\nCarmine(nanete, trey) and Relentless(trey) -> Mannerly(nanete)\n\nnot Carmine(trey, trey)\n\nnot Carmine(trey, trey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The alain powderise the ronny. The alain pelt the ronny. The alain is egoistic. The alain is timeless. The alain is fiscal. The alain is ornery. The alain suckle the ronny. The ronny powderise the alain. The ronny pelt the alain. The ronny is egoistic. The ronny is timeless. The ronny is surpassing. The ronny is fiscal. The ronny is ornery. The ronny suckle the alain. If something powderise the ronny then it pelt the ronny. If something suckle the ronny and the ronny is surpassing then it powderise the ronny. If the alain pelt the ronny and the ronny is fiscal then the ronny pelt the alain. If something is egoistic then it powderise the ronny. If something pelt the ronny then it suckle the ronny. If the ronny powderise the alain and the alain is ornery then the ronny is fiscal. The alain suckle the alain.", "logic": "\nPowderise(alain, ronny)\nPelt(alain, ronny)\nEgoistic(alain)\nTimeless(alain)\nFiscal(alain)\nOrnery(alain)\nSuckle(alain, ronny)\nPowderise(ronny, alain)\nPelt(ronny, alain)\nEgoistic(ronny)\nTimeless(ronny)\nSurpassing(ronny)\nFiscal(ronny)\nOrnery(ronny)\nSuckle(ronny, alain)\nforall x (Powderise(x, ronny) -> Pelt(x, ronny))\nforall x (Suckle(x, ronny) and Surpassing(ronny) -> Powderise(x, ronny))\nPelt(alain, ronny) and Fiscal(ronny) -> Pelt(ronny, alain)\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Powderise(x, ronny))\nforall x (Pelt(x, ronny) -> Suckle(x, ronny))\nPowderise(ronny, alain) and Ornery(alain) -> Fiscal(ronny)\n\nSuckle(alain, alain)\n\nSuckle(alain, alain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The aleda bethink the jacinda. The jacinda is terrible. The jacinda bethink the aleda. If something bethink the jacinda and it bethink the aleda then it sterilise the aleda. If something bethink the jacinda then it bethink the aleda. If something subscribe the aleda and it subscribe the jacinda then the jacinda subscribe the aleda. If something sterilise the aleda then the aleda subscribe the jacinda. If something is posterior and it subscribe the jacinda then the jacinda is unpeaceful. If something subscribe the jacinda and it subscribe the aleda then the jacinda is terrible. The jacinda bethink the aleda.", "logic": "\nBethink(aleda, jacinda)\nTerrible(jacinda)\nBethink(jacinda, aleda)\nforall x (Bethink(x, jacinda) and Bethink(x, aleda) -> Sterilise(x, aleda))\nforall x (Bethink(x, jacinda) -> Bethink(x, aleda))\nforall x (Subscribe(x, aleda) and Subscribe(x, jacinda) -> Subscribe(jacinda, aleda))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, aleda) -> Subscribe(aleda, jacinda))\nforall x (Posterior(x) and Subscribe(x, jacinda) -> Unpeaceful(jacinda))\nforall x (Subscribe(x, jacinda) and Subscribe(x, aleda) -> Terrible(jacinda))\n\nBethink(jacinda, aleda)\n\ntherefore Bethink(jacinda, aleda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The paddy outmarch the vladamir. The vladamir is urceolate. The vladamir outmarch the paddy. If something outmarch the vladamir and it outmarch the paddy then it devastate the paddy. If something outmarch the vladamir then it outmarch the paddy. If something costume the paddy and it costume the vladamir then the vladamir costume the paddy. If something devastate the paddy then the paddy costume the vladamir. If something is rickety and it costume the vladamir then the vladamir is latter. If something costume the vladamir and it costume the paddy then the vladamir is urceolate. The vladamir does not like the paddy.", "logic": "\nOutmarch(paddy, vladamir)\nUrceolate(vladamir)\nOutmarch(vladamir, paddy)\nforall x (Outmarch(x, vladamir) and Outmarch(x, paddy) -> Devastate(x, paddy))\nforall x (Outmarch(x, vladamir) -> Outmarch(x, paddy))\nforall x (Costume(x, paddy) and Costume(x, vladamir) -> Costume(vladamir, paddy))\nforall x (Devastate(x, paddy) -> Costume(paddy, vladamir))\nforall x (Rickety(x) and Costume(x, vladamir) -> Latter(vladamir))\nforall x (Costume(x, vladamir) and Costume(x, paddy) -> Urceolate(vladamir))\n\nnot Outmarch(vladamir, paddy)\n\ntherefore Outmarch(vladamir, paddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The laurella rebury the halvard. The halvard is frequent. The halvard rebury the laurella. If something rebury the halvard and it rebury the laurella then it aquaplane the laurella. If something rebury the halvard then it rebury the laurella. If something bedizen the laurella and it bedizen the halvard then the halvard bedizen the laurella. If something aquaplane the laurella then the laurella bedizen the halvard. If something is phoney and it bedizen the halvard then the halvard is mown. If something bedizen the halvard and it bedizen the laurella then the halvard is frequent. The laurella rebury the laurella.", "logic": "\nRebury(laurella, halvard)\nFrequent(halvard)\nRebury(halvard, laurella)\nforall x (Rebury(x, halvard) and Rebury(x, laurella) -> Aquaplane(x, laurella))\nforall x (Rebury(x, halvard) -> Rebury(x, laurella))\nforall x (Bedizen(x, laurella) and Bedizen(x, halvard) -> Bedizen(halvard, laurella))\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, laurella) -> Bedizen(laurella, halvard))\nforall x (Phoney(x) and Bedizen(x, halvard) -> Mown(halvard))\nforall x (Bedizen(x, halvard) and Bedizen(x, laurella) -> Frequent(halvard))\n\nRebury(laurella, laurella)\n\nRebury(laurella, halvard) and forall x (Rebury(x, halvard) -> Rebury(x, laurella)) -> therefore Rebury(laurella, laurella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The shurlock curb the penelope. The penelope is hematic. The penelope curb the shurlock. If something curb the penelope and it curb the shurlock then it decolonise the shurlock. If something curb the penelope then it curb the shurlock. If something wish the shurlock and it wish the penelope then the penelope wish the shurlock. If something decolonise the shurlock then the shurlock wish the penelope. If something is imitative and it wish the penelope then the penelope is renewable. If something wish the penelope and it wish the shurlock then the penelope is hematic. The shurlock does not like the shurlock.", "logic": "\nCurb(shurlock, penelope)\nHematic(penelope)\nCurb(penelope, shurlock)\nforall x (Curb(x, penelope) and Curb(x, shurlock) -> Decolonise(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Curb(x, penelope) -> Curb(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Wish(x, shurlock) and Wish(x, penelope) -> Wish(penelope, shurlock))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, shurlock) -> Wish(shurlock, penelope))\nforall x (Imitative(x) and Wish(x, penelope) -> Renewable(penelope))\nforall x (Wish(x, penelope) and Wish(x, shurlock) -> Hematic(penelope))\n\nnot Curb(shurlock, shurlock)\n\nCurb(shurlock, penelope) and forall x (Curb(x, penelope) -> Curb(x, shurlock)) -> therefore Curb(shurlock, shurlock)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The angelo lament the onlea. The onlea is frangible. The onlea lament the angelo. If something lament the onlea and it lament the angelo then it wreathe the angelo. If something lament the onlea then it lament the angelo. If something cuss the angelo and it cuss the onlea then the onlea cuss the angelo. If something wreathe the angelo then the angelo cuss the onlea. If something is frosty and it cuss the onlea then the onlea is dwindling. If something cuss the onlea and it cuss the angelo then the onlea is frangible. The angelo wreathe the angelo.", "logic": "\nLament(angelo, onlea)\nFrangible(onlea)\nLament(onlea, angelo)\nforall x (Lament(x, onlea) and Lament(x, angelo) -> Wreathe(x, angelo))\nforall x (Lament(x, onlea) -> Lament(x, angelo))\nforall x (Cuss(x, angelo) and Cuss(x, onlea) -> Cuss(onlea, angelo))\nforall x (Wreathe(x, angelo) -> Cuss(angelo, onlea))\nforall x (Frosty(x) and Cuss(x, onlea) -> Dwindling(onlea))\nforall x (Cuss(x, onlea) and Cuss(x, angelo) -> Frangible(onlea))\n\nWreathe(angelo, angelo)\n\nLament(angelo, onlea) and forall x (Lament(x, onlea) -> Lament(x, angelo)) -> therefore Lament(angelo, angelo) Lament(angelo, onlea) and Lament(angelo, angelo) and forall x (Lament(x, onlea) and Lament(x, angelo) -> Wreathe(x, angelo)) -> therefore Wreathe(angelo, angelo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The rafaelia card the nico. The nico is glutted. The nico card the rafaelia. If something card the nico and it card the rafaelia then it alliterate the rafaelia. If something card the nico then it card the rafaelia. If something entice the rafaelia and it entice the nico then the nico entice the rafaelia. If something alliterate the rafaelia then the rafaelia entice the nico. If something is colonnaded and it entice the nico then the nico is unneeded. If something entice the nico and it entice the rafaelia then the nico is glutted. The rafaelia does not visit the rafaelia.", "logic": "\nCard(rafaelia, nico)\nGlutted(nico)\nCard(nico, rafaelia)\nforall x (Card(x, nico) and Card(x, rafaelia) -> Alliterate(x, rafaelia))\nforall x (Card(x, nico) -> Card(x, rafaelia))\nforall x (Entice(x, rafaelia) and Entice(x, nico) -> Entice(nico, rafaelia))\nforall x (Alliterate(x, rafaelia) -> Entice(rafaelia, nico))\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) and Entice(x, nico) -> Unneeded(nico))\nforall x (Entice(x, nico) and Entice(x, rafaelia) -> Glutted(nico))\n\nnot Alliterate(rafaelia, rafaelia)\n\nCard(rafaelia, nico) and forall x (Card(x, nico) -> Card(x, rafaelia)) -> therefore Card(rafaelia, rafaelia) Card(rafaelia, nico) and Card(rafaelia, rafaelia) and forall x (Card(x, nico) and Card(x, rafaelia) -> Alliterate(x, rafaelia)) -> therefore Alliterate(rafaelia, rafaelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The ezra netmail the hercules. The hercules is specular. The hercules netmail the ezra. If something netmail the hercules and it netmail the ezra then it causeway the ezra. If something netmail the hercules then it netmail the ezra. If something maximize the ezra and it maximize the hercules then the hercules maximize the ezra. If something causeway the ezra then the ezra maximize the hercules. If something is weepy and it maximize the hercules then the hercules is vinegarish. If something maximize the hercules and it maximize the ezra then the hercules is specular. The ezra maximize the hercules.", "logic": "\nNetmail(ezra, hercules)\nSpecular(hercules)\nNetmail(hercules, ezra)\nforall x (Netmail(x, hercules) and Netmail(x, ezra) -> Causeway(x, ezra))\nforall x (Netmail(x, hercules) -> Netmail(x, ezra))\nforall x (Maximize(x, ezra) and Maximize(x, hercules) -> Maximize(hercules, ezra))\nforall x (Causeway(x, ezra) -> Maximize(ezra, hercules))\nforall x (Weepy(x) and Maximize(x, hercules) -> Vinegarish(hercules))\nforall x (Maximize(x, hercules) and Maximize(x, ezra) -> Specular(hercules))\n\nMaximize(ezra, hercules)\n\nNetmail(ezra, hercules) and forall x (Netmail(x, hercules) -> Netmail(x, ezra)) -> therefore Netmail(ezra, ezra) Netmail(ezra, hercules) and Netmail(ezra, ezra) and forall x (Netmail(x, hercules) and Netmail(x, ezra) -> Causeway(x, ezra)) -> therefore Causeway(ezra, ezra) Causeway(ezra, ezra) and forall x (Causeway(x, ezra) -> Maximize(ezra, hercules)) -> therefore Maximize(ezra, hercules)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The sheba bomb the luise. The luise is cyan. The luise bomb the sheba. If something bomb the luise and it bomb the sheba then it resplend the sheba. If something bomb the luise then it bomb the sheba. If something channelize the sheba and it channelize the luise then the luise channelize the sheba. If something resplend the sheba then the sheba channelize the luise. If something is sheer and it channelize the luise then the luise is idempotent. If something channelize the luise and it channelize the sheba then the luise is cyan. The sheba does not chase the luise.", "logic": "\nBomb(sheba, luise)\nCyan(luise)\nBomb(luise, sheba)\nforall x (Bomb(x, luise) and Bomb(x, sheba) -> Resplend(x, sheba))\nforall x (Bomb(x, luise) -> Bomb(x, sheba))\nforall x (Channelize(x, sheba) and Channelize(x, luise) -> Channelize(luise, sheba))\nforall x (Resplend(x, sheba) -> Channelize(sheba, luise))\nforall x (Sheer(x) and Channelize(x, luise) -> Idempotent(luise))\nforall x (Channelize(x, luise) and Channelize(x, sheba) -> Cyan(luise))\n\nnot Channelize(sheba, luise)\n\nBomb(sheba, luise) and forall x (Bomb(x, luise) -> Bomb(x, sheba)) -> therefore Bomb(sheba, sheba) Bomb(sheba, luise) and Bomb(sheba, sheba) and forall x (Bomb(x, luise) and Bomb(x, sheba) -> Resplend(x, sheba)) -> therefore Resplend(sheba, sheba) Resplend(sheba, sheba) and forall x (Resplend(x, sheba) -> Channelize(sheba, luise)) -> therefore Channelize(sheba, luise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The gates edulcorate the roosevelt. The roosevelt is cyrillic. The roosevelt edulcorate the gates. If something edulcorate the roosevelt and it edulcorate the gates then it lull the gates. If something edulcorate the roosevelt then it edulcorate the gates. If something confect the gates and it confect the roosevelt then the roosevelt confect the gates. If something lull the gates then the gates confect the roosevelt. If something is marital and it confect the roosevelt then the roosevelt is forcible. If something confect the roosevelt and it confect the gates then the roosevelt is cyrillic. The roosevelt does not chase the gates.", "logic": "\nEdulcorate(gates, roosevelt)\nCyrillic(roosevelt)\nEdulcorate(roosevelt, gates)\nforall x (Edulcorate(x, roosevelt) and Edulcorate(x, gates) -> Lull(x, gates))\nforall x (Edulcorate(x, roosevelt) -> Edulcorate(x, gates))\nforall x (Confect(x, gates) and Confect(x, roosevelt) -> Confect(roosevelt, gates))\nforall x (Lull(x, gates) -> Confect(gates, roosevelt))\nforall x (Marital(x) and Confect(x, roosevelt) -> Forcible(roosevelt))\nforall x (Confect(x, roosevelt) and Confect(x, gates) -> Cyrillic(roosevelt))\n\nnot Confect(roosevelt, gates)\n\nforall x (Confect(x, gates) and Confect(x, roosevelt) -> Confect(roosevelt, gates)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The carli referee the shirleen. The shirleen is subtle. The shirleen referee the carli. If something referee the shirleen and it referee the carli then it apostatize the carli. If something referee the shirleen then it referee the carli. If something stratify the carli and it stratify the shirleen then the shirleen stratify the carli. If something apostatize the carli then the carli stratify the shirleen. If something is arthritic and it stratify the shirleen then the shirleen is shredded. If something stratify the shirleen and it stratify the carli then the shirleen is subtle. The shirleen is shredded.", "logic": "\nReferee(carli, shirleen)\nSubtle(shirleen)\nReferee(shirleen, carli)\nforall x (Referee(x, shirleen) and Referee(x, carli) -> Apostatize(x, carli))\nforall x (Referee(x, shirleen) -> Referee(x, carli))\nforall x (Stratify(x, carli) and Stratify(x, shirleen) -> Stratify(shirleen, carli))\nforall x (Apostatize(x, carli) -> Stratify(carli, shirleen))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and Stratify(x, shirleen) -> Shredded(shirleen))\nforall x (Stratify(x, shirleen) and Stratify(x, carli) -> Subtle(shirleen))\n\nShredded(shirleen)\n\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and Stratify(x, shirleen) -> Shredded(shirleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The vally unteach the mari. The mari is unmerited. The mari unteach the vally. If something unteach the mari and it unteach the vally then it index the vally. If something unteach the mari then it unteach the vally. If something birle the vally and it birle the mari then the mari birle the vally. If something index the vally then the vally birle the mari. If something is organismal and it birle the mari then the mari is underlying. If something birle the mari and it birle the vally then the mari is unmerited. The mari does not visit the vally.", "logic": "\nUnteach(vally, mari)\nUnmerited(mari)\nUnteach(mari, vally)\nforall x (Unteach(x, mari) and Unteach(x, vally) -> Index(x, vally))\nforall x (Unteach(x, mari) -> Unteach(x, vally))\nforall x (Birle(x, vally) and Birle(x, mari) -> Birle(mari, vally))\nforall x (Index(x, vally) -> Birle(vally, mari))\nforall x (Organismal(x) and Birle(x, mari) -> Underlying(mari))\nforall x (Birle(x, mari) and Birle(x, vally) -> Unmerited(mari))\n\nnot Index(mari, vally)\n\nforall x (Unteach(x, mari) and Unteach(x, vally) -> Index(x, vally)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The merle sicken the harlene. The harlene is colorful. The harlene sicken the merle. If something sicken the harlene and it sicken the merle then it dynamise the merle. If something sicken the harlene then it sicken the merle. If something look the merle and it look the harlene then the harlene look the merle. If something dynamise the merle then the merle look the harlene. If something is mannish and it look the harlene then the harlene is neritic. If something look the harlene and it look the merle then the harlene is colorful. The merle dynamise the harlene.", "logic": "\nSicken(merle, harlene)\nColorful(harlene)\nSicken(harlene, merle)\nforall x (Sicken(x, harlene) and Sicken(x, merle) -> Dynamise(x, merle))\nforall x (Sicken(x, harlene) -> Sicken(x, merle))\nforall x (Look(x, merle) and Look(x, harlene) -> Look(harlene, merle))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, merle) -> Look(merle, harlene))\nforall x (Mannish(x) and Look(x, harlene) -> Neritic(harlene))\nforall x (Look(x, harlene) and Look(x, merle) -> Colorful(harlene))\n\nDynamise(merle, harlene)\n\nDynamise(merle, harlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The waverly miaou the annabelle. The annabelle is hulky. The annabelle miaou the waverly. If something miaou the annabelle and it miaou the waverly then it whipsaw the waverly. If something miaou the annabelle then it miaou the waverly. If something holler the waverly and it holler the annabelle then the annabelle holler the waverly. If something whipsaw the waverly then the waverly holler the annabelle. If something is juridic and it holler the annabelle then the annabelle is danish. If something holler the annabelle and it holler the waverly then the annabelle is hulky. The annabelle is not blue.", "logic": "\nMiaou(waverly, annabelle)\nHulky(annabelle)\nMiaou(annabelle, waverly)\nforall x (Miaou(x, annabelle) and Miaou(x, waverly) -> Whipsaw(x, waverly))\nforall x (Miaou(x, annabelle) -> Miaou(x, waverly))\nforall x (Holler(x, waverly) and Holler(x, annabelle) -> Holler(annabelle, waverly))\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, waverly) -> Holler(waverly, annabelle))\nforall x (Juridic(x) and Holler(x, annabelle) -> Danish(annabelle))\nforall x (Holler(x, annabelle) and Holler(x, waverly) -> Hulky(annabelle))\n\nnot Blue(annabelle)\n\nnot Blue(annabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The sib opine the nanine. The nanine is rushy. The nanine opine the sib. If something opine the nanine and it opine the sib then it implant the sib. If something opine the nanine then it opine the sib. If something festinate the sib and it festinate the nanine then the nanine festinate the sib. If something implant the sib then the sib festinate the nanine. If something is fluvial and it festinate the nanine then the nanine is headless. If something festinate the nanine and it festinate the sib then the nanine is rushy. The sib is rushy.", "logic": "\nOpine(sib, nanine)\nRushy(nanine)\nOpine(nanine, sib)\nforall x (Opine(x, nanine) and Opine(x, sib) -> Implant(x, sib))\nforall x (Opine(x, nanine) -> Opine(x, sib))\nforall x (Festinate(x, sib) and Festinate(x, nanine) -> Festinate(nanine, sib))\nforall x (Implant(x, sib) -> Festinate(sib, nanine))\nforall x (Fluvial(x) and Festinate(x, nanine) -> Headless(nanine))\nforall x (Festinate(x, nanine) and Festinate(x, sib) -> Rushy(nanine))\n\nRushy(sib)\n\nRushy(sib) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The sayre enplane the meier. The meier is additive. The meier enplane the sayre. If something enplane the meier and it enplane the sayre then it undrape the sayre. If something enplane the meier then it enplane the sayre. If something insufflate the sayre and it insufflate the meier then the meier insufflate the sayre. If something undrape the sayre then the sayre insufflate the meier. If something is idolized and it insufflate the meier then the meier is smoggy. If something insufflate the meier and it insufflate the sayre then the meier is additive. The meier does not chase the meier.", "logic": "\nEnplane(sayre, meier)\nAdditive(meier)\nEnplane(meier, sayre)\nforall x (Enplane(x, meier) and Enplane(x, sayre) -> Undrape(x, sayre))\nforall x (Enplane(x, meier) -> Enplane(x, sayre))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, sayre) and Insufflate(x, meier) -> Insufflate(meier, sayre))\nforall x (Undrape(x, sayre) -> Insufflate(sayre, meier))\nforall x (Idolized(x) and Insufflate(x, meier) -> Smoggy(meier))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, meier) and Insufflate(x, sayre) -> Additive(meier))\n\nnot Insufflate(meier, meier)\n\nnot Insufflate(meier, meier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The krystal total the ronald. The ronald is leaved. The ronald total the krystal. If something total the ronald and it total the krystal then it reorganise the krystal. If something total the ronald then it total the krystal. If something lounge the krystal and it lounge the ronald then the ronald lounge the krystal. If something reorganise the krystal then the krystal lounge the ronald. If something is truncated and it lounge the ronald then the ronald is cloggy. If something lounge the ronald and it lounge the krystal then the ronald is leaved. The krystal is cold.", "logic": "\nTotal(krystal, ronald)\nLeaved(ronald)\nTotal(ronald, krystal)\nforall x (Total(x, ronald) and Total(x, krystal) -> Reorganise(x, krystal))\nforall x (Total(x, ronald) -> Total(x, krystal))\nforall x (Lounge(x, krystal) and Lounge(x, ronald) -> Lounge(ronald, krystal))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, krystal) -> Lounge(krystal, ronald))\nforall x (Truncated(x) and Lounge(x, ronald) -> Cloggy(ronald))\nforall x (Lounge(x, ronald) and Lounge(x, krystal) -> Leaved(ronald))\n\nCold(krystal)\n\nCold(krystal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Dorry is fascist. Anatoly is uttered. Pryce is uttered. If Dorry is archducal and Dorry is stalwart then Dorry is anopheline. If something is fascist and acanthotic then it is stalwart. Big, acanthotic things are anopheline. If Pryce is stalwart then Pryce is instinct. All uttered things are stalwart. All instinct, anopheline things are archducal. All uttered, instinct things are fascist. All uttered, acanthotic things are archducal. Anatoly is uttered.", "logic": "\nFascist(dorry)\nUttered(anatoly)\nUttered(pryce)\nArchducal(dorry) and Stalwart(dorry) -> Anopheline(dorry)\nforall x (Fascist(x) and Acanthotic(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nforall x (Fascist(x) and Acanthotic(x) -> Anopheline(x))\nStalwart(pryce) -> Instinct(pryce)\nforall x (Uttered(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nforall x (Instinct(x) and Anopheline(x) -> Archducal(x))\nforall x (Uttered(x) and Instinct(x) -> Fascist(x))\nforall x (Uttered(x) and Acanthotic(x) -> Archducal(x))\n\nUttered(anatoly)\n\ntherefore Uttered(anatoly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Rania is unobliging. Arlyn is wordless. Benedikta is wordless. If Rania is exclusive and Rania is learned then Rania is dressy. If something is unobliging and egocentric then it is learned. Big, egocentric things are dressy. If Benedikta is learned then Benedikta is capitalist. All wordless things are learned. All capitalist, dressy things are exclusive. All wordless, capitalist things are unobliging. All wordless, egocentric things are exclusive. Arlyn is not wordless.", "logic": "\nUnobliging(rania)\nWordless(arlyn)\nWordless(benedikta)\nExclusive(rania) and Learned(rania) -> Dressy(rania)\nforall x (Unobliging(x) and Egocentric(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Unobliging(x) and Egocentric(x) -> Dressy(x))\nLearned(benedikta) -> Capitalist(benedikta)\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) and Dressy(x) -> Exclusive(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) and Capitalist(x) -> Unobliging(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) and Egocentric(x) -> Exclusive(x))\n\nnot Wordless(arlyn)\n\ntherefore Wordless(arlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Erma is doubled. Bernetta is ignored. Tarrant is ignored. If Erma is bounded and Erma is studded then Erma is sewn. If something is doubled and eastside then it is studded. Big, eastside things are sewn. If Tarrant is studded then Tarrant is unicuspid. All ignored things are studded. All unicuspid, sewn things are bounded. All ignored, unicuspid things are doubled. All ignored, eastside things are bounded. Tarrant is studded.", "logic": "\nDoubled(erma)\nIgnored(bernetta)\nIgnored(tarrant)\nBounded(erma) and Studded(erma) -> Sewn(erma)\nforall x (Doubled(x) and Eastside(x) -> Studded(x))\nforall x (Doubled(x) and Eastside(x) -> Sewn(x))\nStudded(tarrant) -> Unicuspid(tarrant)\nforall x (Ignored(x) -> Studded(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) and Sewn(x) -> Bounded(x))\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Unicuspid(x) -> Doubled(x))\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Eastside(x) -> Bounded(x))\n\nStudded(tarrant)\n\nIgnored(tarrant) and forall x (Ignored(x) -> Studded(x)) -> therefore Studded(tarrant)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Elihu is rumbling. Berri is unbaffled. Rica is unbaffled. If Elihu is lunisolar and Elihu is favorable then Elihu is diverse. If something is rumbling and unpackaged then it is favorable. Big, unpackaged things are diverse. If Rica is favorable then Rica is libertine. All unbaffled things are favorable. All libertine, diverse things are lunisolar. All unbaffled, libertine things are rumbling. All unbaffled, unpackaged things are lunisolar. Berri is not favorable.", "logic": "\nRumbling(elihu)\nUnbaffled(berri)\nUnbaffled(rica)\nLunisolar(elihu) and Favorable(elihu) -> Diverse(elihu)\nforall x (Rumbling(x) and Unpackaged(x) -> Favorable(x))\nforall x (Rumbling(x) and Unpackaged(x) -> Diverse(x))\nFavorable(rica) -> Libertine(rica)\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) -> Favorable(x))\nforall x (Libertine(x) and Diverse(x) -> Lunisolar(x))\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) and Libertine(x) -> Rumbling(x))\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) and Unpackaged(x) -> Lunisolar(x))\n\nnot Favorable(berri)\n\nUnbaffled(berri) and forall x (Unbaffled(x) -> Favorable(x)) -> therefore Favorable(berri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Reta is east. Tiffie is vapid. Marmaduke is vapid. If Reta is pending and Reta is ungrateful then Reta is incurvate. If something is east and botswanan then it is ungrateful. Big, botswanan things are incurvate. If Marmaduke is ungrateful then Marmaduke is noted. All vapid things are ungrateful. All noted, incurvate things are pending. All vapid, noted things are east. All vapid, botswanan things are pending. Marmaduke is noted.", "logic": "\nEast(reta)\nVapid(tiffie)\nVapid(marmaduke)\nPending(reta) and Ungrateful(reta) -> Incurvate(reta)\nforall x (East(x) and Botswanan(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (East(x) and Botswanan(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nUngrateful(marmaduke) -> Noted(marmaduke)\nforall x (Vapid(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (Noted(x) and Incurvate(x) -> Pending(x))\nforall x (Vapid(x) and Noted(x) -> East(x))\nforall x (Vapid(x) and Botswanan(x) -> Pending(x))\n\nNoted(marmaduke)\n\nVapid(marmaduke) and forall x (Vapid(x) -> Ungrateful(x)) -> therefore Ungrateful(marmaduke) Ungrateful(marmaduke) and Ungrateful(marmaduke) -> Noted(marmaduke) -> therefore Noted(marmaduke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Pammi is dianoetic. Stirling is authorized. Sawyere is authorized. If Pammi is antrorse and Pammi is revised then Pammi is mediated. If something is dianoetic and fictive then it is revised. Big, fictive things are mediated. If Sawyere is revised then Sawyere is papillose. All authorized things are revised. All papillose, mediated things are antrorse. All authorized, papillose things are dianoetic. All authorized, fictive things are antrorse. Sawyere is not papillose.", "logic": "\nDianoetic(pammi)\nAuthorized(stirling)\nAuthorized(sawyere)\nAntrorse(pammi) and Revised(pammi) -> Mediated(pammi)\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Fictive(x) -> Revised(x))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and Fictive(x) -> Mediated(x))\nRevised(sawyere) -> Papillose(sawyere)\nforall x (Authorized(x) -> Revised(x))\nforall x (Papillose(x) and Mediated(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Papillose(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Fictive(x) -> Antrorse(x))\n\nnot Papillose(sawyere)\n\nAuthorized(sawyere) and forall x (Authorized(x) -> Revised(x)) -> therefore Revised(sawyere) Revised(sawyere) and Revised(sawyere) -> Papillose(sawyere) -> therefore Papillose(sawyere)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Blair is choice. Jacklyn is automated. Keely is automated. If Blair is cuspate and Blair is galore then Blair is reverting. If something is choice and logistic then it is galore. Big, logistic things are reverting. If Keely is galore then Keely is accusive. All automated things are galore. All accusive, reverting things are cuspate. All automated, accusive things are choice. All automated, logistic things are cuspate. Keely is choice.", "logic": "\nChoice(blair)\nAutomated(jacklyn)\nAutomated(keely)\nCuspate(blair) and Galore(blair) -> Reverting(blair)\nforall x (Choice(x) and Logistic(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Choice(x) and Logistic(x) -> Reverting(x))\nGalore(keely) -> Accusive(keely)\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Galore(x))\nforall x (Accusive(x) and Reverting(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Accusive(x) -> Choice(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Logistic(x) -> Cuspate(x))\n\nChoice(keely)\n\nAutomated(keely) and forall x (Automated(x) -> Galore(x)) -> therefore Galore(keely) Galore(keely) and Galore(keely) -> Accusive(keely) -> therefore Accusive(keely) Automated(keely) and Accusive(keely) and forall x (Automated(x) and Accusive(x) -> Choice(x)) -> therefore Choice(keely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Sarina is sunken. Elaina is devious. Ericha is devious. If Sarina is twee and Sarina is billiard then Sarina is perianal. If something is sunken and constant then it is billiard. Big, constant things are perianal. If Ericha is billiard then Ericha is ferial. All devious things are billiard. All ferial, perianal things are twee. All devious, ferial things are sunken. All devious, constant things are twee. Ericha is not sunken.", "logic": "\nSunken(sarina)\nDevious(elaina)\nDevious(ericha)\nTwee(sarina) and Billiard(sarina) -> Perianal(sarina)\nforall x (Sunken(x) and Constant(x) -> Billiard(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) and Constant(x) -> Perianal(x))\nBilliard(ericha) -> Ferial(ericha)\nforall x (Devious(x) -> Billiard(x))\nforall x (Ferial(x) and Perianal(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Devious(x) and Ferial(x) -> Sunken(x))\nforall x (Devious(x) and Constant(x) -> Twee(x))\n\nnot Sunken(ericha)\n\nDevious(ericha) and forall x (Devious(x) -> Billiard(x)) -> therefore Billiard(ericha) Billiard(ericha) and Billiard(ericha) -> Ferial(ericha) -> therefore Ferial(ericha) Devious(ericha) and Ferial(ericha) and forall x (Devious(x) and Ferial(x) -> Sunken(x)) -> therefore Sunken(ericha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Hercules is sticking. Kerrill is traumatic. Courtenay is traumatic. If Hercules is creedal and Hercules is corrosive then Hercules is autosomal. If something is sticking and bounden then it is corrosive. Big, bounden things are autosomal. If Courtenay is corrosive then Courtenay is streaming. All traumatic things are corrosive. All streaming, autosomal things are creedal. All traumatic, streaming things are sticking. All traumatic, bounden things are creedal. Hercules is not autosomal.", "logic": "\nSticking(hercules)\nTraumatic(kerrill)\nTraumatic(courtenay)\nCreedal(hercules) and Corrosive(hercules) -> Autosomal(hercules)\nforall x (Sticking(x) and Bounden(x) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Sticking(x) and Bounden(x) -> Autosomal(x))\nCorrosive(courtenay) -> Streaming(courtenay)\nforall x (Traumatic(x) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Streaming(x) and Autosomal(x) -> Creedal(x))\nforall x (Traumatic(x) and Streaming(x) -> Sticking(x))\nforall x (Traumatic(x) and Bounden(x) -> Creedal(x))\n\nnot Autosomal(hercules)\n\nCreedal(hercules) and Corrosive(hercules) -> Autosomal(hercules) <- forall x (Streaming(x) and Autosomal(x) -> Creedal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Ula is lobated. Florry is appeasable. Conan is appeasable. If Ula is amateur and Ula is discreet then Ula is gradatory. If something is lobated and sketchy then it is discreet. Big, sketchy things are gradatory. If Conan is discreet then Conan is tenor. All appeasable things are discreet. All tenor, gradatory things are amateur. All appeasable, tenor things are lobated. All appeasable, sketchy things are amateur. Ula is amateur.", "logic": "\nLobated(ula)\nAppeasable(florry)\nAppeasable(conan)\nAmateur(ula) and Discreet(ula) -> Gradatory(ula)\nforall x (Lobated(x) and Sketchy(x) -> Discreet(x))\nforall x (Lobated(x) and Sketchy(x) -> Gradatory(x))\nDiscreet(conan) -> Tenor(conan)\nforall x (Appeasable(x) -> Discreet(x))\nforall x (Tenor(x) and Gradatory(x) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Appeasable(x) and Tenor(x) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Appeasable(x) and Sketchy(x) -> Amateur(x))\n\nAmateur(ula)\n\nforall x (Tenor(x) and Gradatory(x) -> Amateur(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Talya is cyanogenic. Chrissy is cerebral. Terrence is cerebral. If Talya is stalwart and Talya is barbate then Talya is meek. If something is cyanogenic and whispering then it is barbate. Big, whispering things are meek. If Terrence is barbate then Terrence is unlovely. All cerebral things are barbate. All unlovely, meek things are stalwart. All cerebral, unlovely things are cyanogenic. All cerebral, whispering things are stalwart. Terrence is not stalwart.", "logic": "\nCyanogenic(talya)\nCerebral(chrissy)\nCerebral(terrence)\nStalwart(talya) and Barbate(talya) -> Meek(talya)\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Whispering(x) -> Barbate(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Whispering(x) -> Meek(x))\nBarbate(terrence) -> Unlovely(terrence)\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> Barbate(x))\nforall x (Unlovely(x) and Meek(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) and Unlovely(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) and Whispering(x) -> Stalwart(x))\n\nnot Stalwart(terrence)\n\nforall x (Unlovely(x) and Meek(x) -> Stalwart(x)) <- forall x (Cyanogenic(x) and Whispering(x) -> Meek(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Bealle is pyaemic. Karen is recessive. Beatrice is recessive. If Bealle is pushful and Bealle is anorexic then Bealle is abyssal. If something is pyaemic and spiffing then it is anorexic. Big, spiffing things are abyssal. If Beatrice is anorexic then Beatrice is portable. All recessive things are anorexic. All portable, abyssal things are pushful. All recessive, portable things are pyaemic. All recessive, spiffing things are pushful. Beatrice is abyssal.", "logic": "\nPyaemic(bealle)\nRecessive(karen)\nRecessive(beatrice)\nPushful(bealle) and Anorexic(bealle) -> Abyssal(bealle)\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) and Spiffing(x) -> Anorexic(x))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) and Spiffing(x) -> Abyssal(x))\nAnorexic(beatrice) -> Portable(beatrice)\nforall x (Recessive(x) -> Anorexic(x))\nforall x (Portable(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Pushful(x))\nforall x (Recessive(x) and Portable(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Recessive(x) and Spiffing(x) -> Pushful(x))\n\nAbyssal(beatrice)\n\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) and Spiffing(x) -> Abyssal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Hervey is lutheran. Cecelia is spinal. Catlee is spinal. If Hervey is somber and Hervey is wonted then Hervey is overriding. If something is lutheran and chinless then it is wonted. Big, chinless things are overriding. If Catlee is wonted then Catlee is centenary. All spinal things are wonted. All centenary, overriding things are somber. All spinal, centenary things are lutheran. All spinal, chinless things are somber. Hervey is not centenary.", "logic": "\nLutheran(hervey)\nSpinal(cecelia)\nSpinal(catlee)\nSomber(hervey) and Wonted(hervey) -> Overriding(hervey)\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and Chinless(x) -> Wonted(x))\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and Chinless(x) -> Overriding(x))\nWonted(catlee) -> Centenary(catlee)\nforall x (Spinal(x) -> Wonted(x))\nforall x (Centenary(x) and Overriding(x) -> Somber(x))\nforall x (Spinal(x) and Centenary(x) -> Lutheran(x))\nforall x (Spinal(x) and Chinless(x) -> Somber(x))\n\nnot Centenary(hervey)\n\nnot Centenary(hervey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Deeanne is polite. Elane is polydactyl. Gunther is polydactyl. If Deeanne is rightmost and Deeanne is restful then Deeanne is enraptured. If something is polite and gandhian then it is restful. Big, gandhian things are enraptured. If Gunther is restful then Gunther is priapic. All polydactyl things are restful. All priapic, enraptured things are rightmost. All polydactyl, priapic things are polite. All polydactyl, gandhian things are rightmost. Gunther is gandhian.", "logic": "\nPolite(deeanne)\nPolydactyl(elane)\nPolydactyl(gunther)\nRightmost(deeanne) and Restful(deeanne) -> Enraptured(deeanne)\nforall x (Polite(x) and Gandhian(x) -> Restful(x))\nforall x (Polite(x) and Gandhian(x) -> Enraptured(x))\nRestful(gunther) -> Priapic(gunther)\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Restful(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) and Enraptured(x) -> Rightmost(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Priapic(x) -> Polite(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Gandhian(x) -> Rightmost(x))\n\nGandhian(gunther)\n\nGandhian(gunther) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Lorita is gowned. Charil is fraternal. Ferguson is fraternal. If Lorita is jointed and Lorita is cavalier then Lorita is xxxvi. If something is gowned and flavorful then it is cavalier. Big, flavorful things are xxxvi. If Ferguson is cavalier then Ferguson is homespun. All fraternal things are cavalier. All homespun, xxxvi things are jointed. All fraternal, homespun things are gowned. All fraternal, flavorful things are jointed. Lorita is not fraternal.", "logic": "\nGowned(lorita)\nFraternal(charil)\nFraternal(ferguson)\nJointed(lorita) and Cavalier(lorita) -> Xxxvi(lorita)\nforall x (Gowned(x) and Flavorful(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Gowned(x) and Flavorful(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nCavalier(ferguson) -> Homespun(ferguson)\nforall x (Fraternal(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) and Xxxvi(x) -> Jointed(x))\nforall x (Fraternal(x) and Homespun(x) -> Gowned(x))\nforall x (Fraternal(x) and Flavorful(x) -> Jointed(x))\n\nnot Fraternal(lorita)\n\nnot Fraternal(lorita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Chane is unemployed. Antoine is chewy. Teane is chewy. If Chane is papistic and Chane is judicial then Chane is burnable. If something is unemployed and waxed then it is judicial. Big, waxed things are burnable. If Teane is judicial then Teane is millenary. All chewy things are judicial. All millenary, burnable things are papistic. All chewy, millenary things are unemployed. All chewy, waxed things are papistic. Antoine is waxed.", "logic": "\nUnemployed(chane)\nChewy(antoine)\nChewy(teane)\nPapistic(chane) and Judicial(chane) -> Burnable(chane)\nforall x (Unemployed(x) and Waxed(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Unemployed(x) and Waxed(x) -> Burnable(x))\nJudicial(teane) -> Millenary(teane)\nforall x (Chewy(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Millenary(x) and Burnable(x) -> Papistic(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) and Millenary(x) -> Unemployed(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) and Waxed(x) -> Papistic(x))\n\nWaxed(antoine)\n\nWaxed(antoine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "The aina is disorderly. The aina outfight the bettye. The aina outfight the gustie. The aina crust the bettye. The aina crust the gustie. The aina financier the bettye. The aina financier the gustie. The bettye is dazed. The bettye crust the gustie. The bettye financier the aina. The gustie is gifted. The gustie is merciless. The gustie outfight the aina. The gustie crust the bettye. The gustie financier the aina. The gustie financier the bettye. If something outfight the aina then the aina outfight the gustie. If something is charged then it outfight the bettye. If something is dazed then it crust the aina. If something crust the aina and the aina outfight the gustie then it outfight the aina. If the bettye outfight the gustie and the gustie crust the bettye then the bettye crust the gustie. If something outfight the aina then it outfight the bettye. If the bettye outfight the gustie and the gustie crust the aina then the gustie crust the bettye. If something crust the bettye then the bettye is merciless. The aina crust the gustie.", "logic": "\nDisorderly(aina)\nOutfight(aina, bettye)\nOutfight(aina, gustie)\nCrust(aina, bettye)\nCrust(aina, gustie)\nFinancier(aina, bettye)\nFinancier(aina, gustie)\nDazed(bettye)\nCrust(bettye, gustie)\nFinancier(bettye, aina)\nGifted(gustie)\nMerciless(gustie)\nOutfight(gustie, aina)\nCrust(gustie, bettye)\nFinancier(gustie, aina)\nFinancier(gustie, bettye)\nforall x (Outfight(x, aina) -> Outfight(aina, gustie))\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Outfight(x, bettye))\nforall x (Dazed(x) -> Crust(x, aina))\nforall x (Crust(x, aina) and Outfight(aina, gustie) -> Outfight(x, aina))\nOutfight(bettye, gustie) and Crust(gustie, bettye) -> Crust(bettye, gustie)\nforall x (Outfight(x, aina) -> Outfight(x, bettye))\nOutfight(bettye, gustie) and Crust(gustie, aina) -> Crust(gustie, bettye)\nforall x (Crust(x, bettye) -> Merciless(bettye))\n\nCrust(aina, gustie)\n\ntherefore Crust(aina, gustie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The filippa is demanding. The filippa flay the tommy. The filippa flay the joleen. The filippa stimulate the tommy. The filippa stimulate the joleen. The filippa bulldog the tommy. The filippa bulldog the joleen. The tommy is fogyish. The tommy stimulate the joleen. The tommy bulldog the filippa. The joleen is fingerless. The joleen is bluff. The joleen flay the filippa. The joleen stimulate the tommy. The joleen bulldog the filippa. The joleen bulldog the tommy. If something flay the filippa then the filippa flay the joleen. If something is struggling then it flay the tommy. If something is fogyish then it stimulate the filippa. If something stimulate the filippa and the filippa flay the joleen then it flay the filippa. If the tommy flay the joleen and the joleen stimulate the tommy then the tommy stimulate the joleen. If something flay the filippa then it flay the tommy. If the tommy flay the joleen and the joleen stimulate the filippa then the joleen stimulate the tommy. If something stimulate the tommy then the tommy is bluff. The tommy does not see the joleen.", "logic": "\nDemanding(filippa)\nFlay(filippa, tommy)\nFlay(filippa, joleen)\nStimulate(filippa, tommy)\nStimulate(filippa, joleen)\nBulldog(filippa, tommy)\nBulldog(filippa, joleen)\nFogyish(tommy)\nStimulate(tommy, joleen)\nBulldog(tommy, filippa)\nFingerless(joleen)\nBluff(joleen)\nFlay(joleen, filippa)\nStimulate(joleen, tommy)\nBulldog(joleen, filippa)\nBulldog(joleen, tommy)\nforall x (Flay(x, filippa) -> Flay(filippa, joleen))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Flay(x, tommy))\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> Stimulate(x, filippa))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, filippa) and Flay(filippa, joleen) -> Flay(x, filippa))\nFlay(tommy, joleen) and Stimulate(joleen, tommy) -> Stimulate(tommy, joleen)\nforall x (Flay(x, filippa) -> Flay(x, tommy))\nFlay(tommy, joleen) and Stimulate(joleen, filippa) -> Stimulate(joleen, tommy)\nforall x (Stimulate(x, tommy) -> Bluff(tommy))\n\nnot Stimulate(tommy, joleen)\n\ntherefore Stimulate(tommy, joleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The salman is hungarian. The salman audit the walsh. The salman audit the caprice. The salman decay the walsh. The salman decay the caprice. The salman debouch the walsh. The salman debouch the caprice. The walsh is erasable. The walsh decay the caprice. The walsh debouch the salman. The caprice is straw. The caprice is ludicrous. The caprice audit the salman. The caprice decay the walsh. The caprice debouch the salman. The caprice debouch the walsh. If something audit the salman then the salman audit the caprice. If something is clunky then it audit the walsh. If something is erasable then it decay the salman. If something decay the salman and the salman audit the caprice then it audit the salman. If the walsh audit the caprice and the caprice decay the walsh then the walsh decay the caprice. If something audit the salman then it audit the walsh. If the walsh audit the caprice and the caprice decay the salman then the caprice decay the walsh. If something decay the walsh then the walsh is ludicrous. The walsh is ludicrous.", "logic": "\nHungarian(salman)\nAudit(salman, walsh)\nAudit(salman, caprice)\nDecay(salman, walsh)\nDecay(salman, caprice)\nDebouch(salman, walsh)\nDebouch(salman, caprice)\nErasable(walsh)\nDecay(walsh, caprice)\nDebouch(walsh, salman)\nStraw(caprice)\nLudicrous(caprice)\nAudit(caprice, salman)\nDecay(caprice, walsh)\nDebouch(caprice, salman)\nDebouch(caprice, walsh)\nforall x (Audit(x, salman) -> Audit(salman, caprice))\nforall x (Clunky(x) -> Audit(x, walsh))\nforall x (Erasable(x) -> Decay(x, salman))\nforall x (Decay(x, salman) and Audit(salman, caprice) -> Audit(x, salman))\nAudit(walsh, caprice) and Decay(caprice, walsh) -> Decay(walsh, caprice)\nforall x (Audit(x, salman) -> Audit(x, walsh))\nAudit(walsh, caprice) and Decay(caprice, salman) -> Decay(caprice, walsh)\nforall x (Decay(x, walsh) -> Ludicrous(walsh))\n\nLudicrous(walsh)\n\nDecay(caprice, walsh) and forall x (Decay(x, walsh) -> Ludicrous(walsh)) -> therefore Ludicrous(walsh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The tabitha is smoothed. The tabitha spit the essie. The tabitha spit the annetta. The tabitha jacket the essie. The tabitha jacket the annetta. The tabitha bituminise the essie. The tabitha bituminise the annetta. The essie is frowsy. The essie jacket the annetta. The essie bituminise the tabitha. The annetta is explicit. The annetta is peckish. The annetta spit the tabitha. The annetta jacket the essie. The annetta bituminise the tabitha. The annetta bituminise the essie. If something spit the tabitha then the tabitha spit the annetta. If something is formal then it spit the essie. If something is frowsy then it jacket the tabitha. If something jacket the tabitha and the tabitha spit the annetta then it spit the tabitha. If the essie spit the annetta and the annetta jacket the essie then the essie jacket the annetta. If something spit the tabitha then it spit the essie. If the essie spit the annetta and the annetta jacket the tabitha then the annetta jacket the essie. If something jacket the essie then the essie is peckish. The essie is not peckish.", "logic": "\nSmoothed(tabitha)\nSpit(tabitha, essie)\nSpit(tabitha, annetta)\nJacket(tabitha, essie)\nJacket(tabitha, annetta)\nBituminise(tabitha, essie)\nBituminise(tabitha, annetta)\nFrowsy(essie)\nJacket(essie, annetta)\nBituminise(essie, tabitha)\nExplicit(annetta)\nPeckish(annetta)\nSpit(annetta, tabitha)\nJacket(annetta, essie)\nBituminise(annetta, tabitha)\nBituminise(annetta, essie)\nforall x (Spit(x, tabitha) -> Spit(tabitha, annetta))\nforall x (Formal(x) -> Spit(x, essie))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Jacket(x, tabitha))\nforall x (Jacket(x, tabitha) and Spit(tabitha, annetta) -> Spit(x, tabitha))\nSpit(essie, annetta) and Jacket(annetta, essie) -> Jacket(essie, annetta)\nforall x (Spit(x, tabitha) -> Spit(x, essie))\nSpit(essie, annetta) and Jacket(annetta, tabitha) -> Jacket(annetta, essie)\nforall x (Jacket(x, essie) -> Peckish(essie))\n\nnot Peckish(essie)\n\nJacket(annetta, essie) and forall x (Jacket(x, essie) -> Peckish(essie)) -> therefore Peckish(essie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The hamlet is meek. The hamlet tube the horst. The hamlet tube the vladimir. The hamlet trample the horst. The hamlet trample the vladimir. The hamlet dwell the horst. The hamlet dwell the vladimir. The horst is ungroomed. The horst trample the vladimir. The horst dwell the hamlet. The vladimir is aligned. The vladimir is corrugated. The vladimir tube the hamlet. The vladimir trample the horst. The vladimir dwell the hamlet. The vladimir dwell the horst. If something tube the hamlet then the hamlet tube the vladimir. If something is mute then it tube the horst. If something is ungroomed then it trample the hamlet. If something trample the hamlet and the hamlet tube the vladimir then it tube the hamlet. If the horst tube the vladimir and the vladimir trample the horst then the horst trample the vladimir. If something tube the hamlet then it tube the horst. If the horst tube the vladimir and the vladimir trample the hamlet then the vladimir trample the horst. If something trample the horst then the horst is corrugated. The horst tube the hamlet.", "logic": "\nMeek(hamlet)\nTube(hamlet, horst)\nTube(hamlet, vladimir)\nTrample(hamlet, horst)\nTrample(hamlet, vladimir)\nDwell(hamlet, horst)\nDwell(hamlet, vladimir)\nUngroomed(horst)\nTrample(horst, vladimir)\nDwell(horst, hamlet)\nAligned(vladimir)\nCorrugated(vladimir)\nTube(vladimir, hamlet)\nTrample(vladimir, horst)\nDwell(vladimir, hamlet)\nDwell(vladimir, horst)\nforall x (Tube(x, hamlet) -> Tube(hamlet, vladimir))\nforall x (Mute(x) -> Tube(x, horst))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Trample(x, hamlet))\nforall x (Trample(x, hamlet) and Tube(hamlet, vladimir) -> Tube(x, hamlet))\nTube(horst, vladimir) and Trample(vladimir, horst) -> Trample(horst, vladimir)\nforall x (Tube(x, hamlet) -> Tube(x, horst))\nTube(horst, vladimir) and Trample(vladimir, hamlet) -> Trample(vladimir, horst)\nforall x (Trample(x, horst) -> Corrugated(horst))\n\nTube(horst, hamlet)\n\nUngroomed(horst) and forall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Trample(x, hamlet)) -> therefore Trample(horst, hamlet) Trample(horst, hamlet) and Tube(hamlet, vladimir) and forall x (Trample(x, hamlet) and Tube(hamlet, vladimir) -> Tube(x, hamlet)) -> therefore Tube(horst, hamlet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The barnett is defamatory. The barnett ravage the neddie. The barnett ravage the dorita. The barnett stereotype the neddie. The barnett stereotype the dorita. The barnett quip the neddie. The barnett quip the dorita. The neddie is mystical. The neddie stereotype the dorita. The neddie quip the barnett. The dorita is mastoid. The dorita is roguish. The dorita ravage the barnett. The dorita stereotype the neddie. The dorita quip the barnett. The dorita quip the neddie. If something ravage the barnett then the barnett ravage the dorita. If something is androgenic then it ravage the neddie. If something is mystical then it stereotype the barnett. If something stereotype the barnett and the barnett ravage the dorita then it ravage the barnett. If the neddie ravage the dorita and the dorita stereotype the neddie then the neddie stereotype the dorita. If something ravage the barnett then it ravage the neddie. If the neddie ravage the dorita and the dorita stereotype the barnett then the dorita stereotype the neddie. If something stereotype the neddie then the neddie is roguish. The neddie does not like the barnett.", "logic": "\nDefamatory(barnett)\nRavage(barnett, neddie)\nRavage(barnett, dorita)\nStereotype(barnett, neddie)\nStereotype(barnett, dorita)\nQuip(barnett, neddie)\nQuip(barnett, dorita)\nMystical(neddie)\nStereotype(neddie, dorita)\nQuip(neddie, barnett)\nMastoid(dorita)\nRoguish(dorita)\nRavage(dorita, barnett)\nStereotype(dorita, neddie)\nQuip(dorita, barnett)\nQuip(dorita, neddie)\nforall x (Ravage(x, barnett) -> Ravage(barnett, dorita))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) -> Ravage(x, neddie))\nforall x (Mystical(x) -> Stereotype(x, barnett))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, barnett) and Ravage(barnett, dorita) -> Ravage(x, barnett))\nRavage(neddie, dorita) and Stereotype(dorita, neddie) -> Stereotype(neddie, dorita)\nforall x (Ravage(x, barnett) -> Ravage(x, neddie))\nRavage(neddie, dorita) and Stereotype(dorita, barnett) -> Stereotype(dorita, neddie)\nforall x (Stereotype(x, neddie) -> Roguish(neddie))\n\nnot Ravage(neddie, barnett)\n\nMystical(neddie) and forall x (Mystical(x) -> Stereotype(x, barnett)) -> therefore Stereotype(neddie, barnett) Stereotype(neddie, barnett) and Ravage(barnett, dorita) and forall x (Stereotype(x, barnett) and Ravage(barnett, dorita) -> Ravage(x, barnett)) -> therefore Ravage(neddie, barnett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The davis is indignant. The davis gradate the corliss. The davis gradate the duke. The davis tessellate the corliss. The davis tessellate the duke. The davis lipread the corliss. The davis lipread the duke. The corliss is corrected. The corliss tessellate the duke. The corliss lipread the davis. The duke is mazed. The duke is priapic. The duke gradate the davis. The duke tessellate the corliss. The duke lipread the davis. The duke lipread the corliss. If something gradate the davis then the davis gradate the duke. If something is washable then it gradate the corliss. If something is corrected then it tessellate the davis. If something tessellate the davis and the davis gradate the duke then it gradate the davis. If the corliss gradate the duke and the duke tessellate the corliss then the corliss tessellate the duke. If something gradate the davis then it gradate the corliss. If the corliss gradate the duke and the duke tessellate the davis then the duke tessellate the corliss. If something tessellate the corliss then the corliss is priapic. The corliss gradate the corliss.", "logic": "\nIndignant(davis)\nGradate(davis, corliss)\nGradate(davis, duke)\nTessellate(davis, corliss)\nTessellate(davis, duke)\nLipread(davis, corliss)\nLipread(davis, duke)\nCorrected(corliss)\nTessellate(corliss, duke)\nLipread(corliss, davis)\nMazed(duke)\nPriapic(duke)\nGradate(duke, davis)\nTessellate(duke, corliss)\nLipread(duke, davis)\nLipread(duke, corliss)\nforall x (Gradate(x, davis) -> Gradate(davis, duke))\nforall x (Washable(x) -> Gradate(x, corliss))\nforall x (Corrected(x) -> Tessellate(x, davis))\nforall x (Tessellate(x, davis) and Gradate(davis, duke) -> Gradate(x, davis))\nGradate(corliss, duke) and Tessellate(duke, corliss) -> Tessellate(corliss, duke)\nforall x (Gradate(x, davis) -> Gradate(x, corliss))\nGradate(corliss, duke) and Tessellate(duke, davis) -> Tessellate(duke, corliss)\nforall x (Tessellate(x, corliss) -> Priapic(corliss))\n\nGradate(corliss, corliss)\n\nCorrected(corliss) and forall x (Corrected(x) -> Tessellate(x, davis)) -> therefore Tessellate(corliss, davis) Tessellate(corliss, davis) and Gradate(davis, duke) and forall x (Tessellate(x, davis) and Gradate(davis, duke) -> Gradate(x, davis)) -> therefore Gradate(corliss, davis) Gradate(corliss, davis) and forall x (Gradate(x, davis) -> Gradate(x, corliss)) -> therefore Gradate(corliss, corliss)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The marten is analog. The marten rehearse the gussie. The marten rehearse the olga. The marten condole the gussie. The marten condole the olga. The marten work the gussie. The marten work the olga. The gussie is glazed. The gussie condole the olga. The gussie work the marten. The olga is quintuple. The olga is waterborne. The olga rehearse the marten. The olga condole the gussie. The olga work the marten. The olga work the gussie. If something rehearse the marten then the marten rehearse the olga. If something is wonderful then it rehearse the gussie. If something is glazed then it condole the marten. If something condole the marten and the marten rehearse the olga then it rehearse the marten. If the gussie rehearse the olga and the olga condole the gussie then the gussie condole the olga. If something rehearse the marten then it rehearse the gussie. If the gussie rehearse the olga and the olga condole the marten then the olga condole the gussie. If something condole the gussie then the gussie is waterborne. The gussie does not like the gussie.", "logic": "\nAnalog(marten)\nRehearse(marten, gussie)\nRehearse(marten, olga)\nCondole(marten, gussie)\nCondole(marten, olga)\nWork(marten, gussie)\nWork(marten, olga)\nGlazed(gussie)\nCondole(gussie, olga)\nWork(gussie, marten)\nQuintuple(olga)\nWaterborne(olga)\nRehearse(olga, marten)\nCondole(olga, gussie)\nWork(olga, marten)\nWork(olga, gussie)\nforall x (Rehearse(x, marten) -> Rehearse(marten, olga))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) -> Rehearse(x, gussie))\nforall x (Glazed(x) -> Condole(x, marten))\nforall x (Condole(x, marten) and Rehearse(marten, olga) -> Rehearse(x, marten))\nRehearse(gussie, olga) and Condole(olga, gussie) -> Condole(gussie, olga)\nforall x (Rehearse(x, marten) -> Rehearse(x, gussie))\nRehearse(gussie, olga) and Condole(olga, marten) -> Condole(olga, gussie)\nforall x (Condole(x, gussie) -> Waterborne(gussie))\n\nnot Rehearse(gussie, gussie)\n\nGlazed(gussie) and forall x (Glazed(x) -> Condole(x, marten)) -> therefore Condole(gussie, marten) Condole(gussie, marten) and Rehearse(marten, olga) and forall x (Condole(x, marten) and Rehearse(marten, olga) -> Rehearse(x, marten)) -> therefore Rehearse(gussie, marten) Rehearse(gussie, marten) and forall x (Rehearse(x, marten) -> Rehearse(x, gussie)) -> therefore Rehearse(gussie, gussie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The elane is diarrhetic. The elane concretise the shantee. The elane concretise the grady. The elane pound the shantee. The elane pound the grady. The elane ossify the shantee. The elane ossify the grady. The shantee is secretive. The shantee pound the grady. The shantee ossify the elane. The grady is severable. The grady is foolish. The grady concretise the elane. The grady pound the shantee. The grady ossify the elane. The grady ossify the shantee. If something concretise the elane then the elane concretise the grady. If something is bigoted then it concretise the shantee. If something is secretive then it pound the elane. If something pound the elane and the elane concretise the grady then it concretise the elane. If the shantee concretise the grady and the grady pound the shantee then the shantee pound the grady. If something concretise the elane then it concretise the shantee. If the shantee concretise the grady and the grady pound the elane then the grady pound the shantee. If something pound the shantee then the shantee is foolish. The grady does not see the elane.", "logic": "\nDiarrhetic(elane)\nConcretise(elane, shantee)\nConcretise(elane, grady)\nPound(elane, shantee)\nPound(elane, grady)\nOssify(elane, shantee)\nOssify(elane, grady)\nSecretive(shantee)\nPound(shantee, grady)\nOssify(shantee, elane)\nSeverable(grady)\nFoolish(grady)\nConcretise(grady, elane)\nPound(grady, shantee)\nOssify(grady, elane)\nOssify(grady, shantee)\nforall x (Concretise(x, elane) -> Concretise(elane, grady))\nforall x (Bigoted(x) -> Concretise(x, shantee))\nforall x (Secretive(x) -> Pound(x, elane))\nforall x (Pound(x, elane) and Concretise(elane, grady) -> Concretise(x, elane))\nConcretise(shantee, grady) and Pound(grady, shantee) -> Pound(shantee, grady)\nforall x (Concretise(x, elane) -> Concretise(x, shantee))\nConcretise(shantee, grady) and Pound(grady, elane) -> Pound(grady, shantee)\nforall x (Pound(x, shantee) -> Foolish(shantee))\n\nnot Pound(grady, elane)\n\nforall x (Secretive(x) -> Pound(x, elane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The vinni is summary. The vinni predecease the wake. The vinni predecease the elsy. The vinni frogmarch the wake. The vinni frogmarch the elsy. The vinni repay the wake. The vinni repay the elsy. The wake is judgmental. The wake frogmarch the elsy. The wake repay the vinni. The elsy is highflying. The elsy is illusional. The elsy predecease the vinni. The elsy frogmarch the wake. The elsy repay the vinni. The elsy repay the wake. If something predecease the vinni then the vinni predecease the elsy. If something is amino then it predecease the wake. If something is judgmental then it frogmarch the vinni. If something frogmarch the vinni and the vinni predecease the elsy then it predecease the vinni. If the wake predecease the elsy and the elsy frogmarch the wake then the wake frogmarch the elsy. If something predecease the vinni then it predecease the wake. If the wake predecease the elsy and the elsy frogmarch the vinni then the elsy frogmarch the wake. If something frogmarch the wake then the wake is illusional. The vinni frogmarch the vinni.", "logic": "\nSummary(vinni)\nPredecease(vinni, wake)\nPredecease(vinni, elsy)\nFrogmarch(vinni, wake)\nFrogmarch(vinni, elsy)\nRepay(vinni, wake)\nRepay(vinni, elsy)\nJudgmental(wake)\nFrogmarch(wake, elsy)\nRepay(wake, vinni)\nHighflying(elsy)\nIllusional(elsy)\nPredecease(elsy, vinni)\nFrogmarch(elsy, wake)\nRepay(elsy, vinni)\nRepay(elsy, wake)\nforall x (Predecease(x, vinni) -> Predecease(vinni, elsy))\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Predecease(x, wake))\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Frogmarch(x, vinni))\nforall x (Frogmarch(x, vinni) and Predecease(vinni, elsy) -> Predecease(x, vinni))\nPredecease(wake, elsy) and Frogmarch(elsy, wake) -> Frogmarch(wake, elsy)\nforall x (Predecease(x, vinni) -> Predecease(x, wake))\nPredecease(wake, elsy) and Frogmarch(elsy, vinni) -> Frogmarch(elsy, wake)\nforall x (Frogmarch(x, wake) -> Illusional(wake))\n\nFrogmarch(vinni, vinni)\n\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Frogmarch(x, vinni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The aleda is aphetic. The aleda outrange the carmon. The aleda outrange the christal. The aleda tumefy the carmon. The aleda tumefy the christal. The aleda facsimile the carmon. The aleda facsimile the christal. The carmon is unending. The carmon tumefy the christal. The carmon facsimile the aleda. The christal is chartreuse. The christal is keyed. The christal outrange the aleda. The christal tumefy the carmon. The christal facsimile the aleda. The christal facsimile the carmon. If something outrange the aleda then the aleda outrange the christal. If something is approving then it outrange the carmon. If something is unending then it tumefy the aleda. If something tumefy the aleda and the aleda outrange the christal then it outrange the aleda. If the carmon outrange the christal and the christal tumefy the carmon then the carmon tumefy the christal. If something outrange the aleda then it outrange the carmon. If the carmon outrange the christal and the christal tumefy the aleda then the christal tumefy the carmon. If something tumefy the carmon then the carmon is keyed. The aleda does not like the aleda.", "logic": "\nAphetic(aleda)\nOutrange(aleda, carmon)\nOutrange(aleda, christal)\nTumefy(aleda, carmon)\nTumefy(aleda, christal)\nFacsimile(aleda, carmon)\nFacsimile(aleda, christal)\nUnending(carmon)\nTumefy(carmon, christal)\nFacsimile(carmon, aleda)\nChartreuse(christal)\nKeyed(christal)\nOutrange(christal, aleda)\nTumefy(christal, carmon)\nFacsimile(christal, aleda)\nFacsimile(christal, carmon)\nforall x (Outrange(x, aleda) -> Outrange(aleda, christal))\nforall x (Approving(x) -> Outrange(x, carmon))\nforall x (Unending(x) -> Tumefy(x, aleda))\nforall x (Tumefy(x, aleda) and Outrange(aleda, christal) -> Outrange(x, aleda))\nOutrange(carmon, christal) and Tumefy(christal, carmon) -> Tumefy(carmon, christal)\nforall x (Outrange(x, aleda) -> Outrange(x, carmon))\nOutrange(carmon, christal) and Tumefy(christal, aleda) -> Tumefy(christal, carmon)\nforall x (Tumefy(x, carmon) -> Keyed(carmon))\n\nnot Outrange(aleda, aleda)\n\nforall x (Tumefy(x, aleda) and Outrange(aleda, christal) -> Outrange(x, aleda)) <- forall x (Unending(x) -> Tumefy(x, aleda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The belinda is untested. The belinda bespot the vic. The belinda bespot the nathanael. The belinda punish the vic. The belinda punish the nathanael. The belinda wear the vic. The belinda wear the nathanael. The vic is sunburned. The vic punish the nathanael. The vic wear the belinda. The nathanael is musty. The nathanael is lithe. The nathanael bespot the belinda. The nathanael punish the vic. The nathanael wear the belinda. The nathanael wear the vic. If something bespot the belinda then the belinda bespot the nathanael. If something is proto then it bespot the vic. If something is sunburned then it punish the belinda. If something punish the belinda and the belinda bespot the nathanael then it bespot the belinda. If the vic bespot the nathanael and the nathanael punish the vic then the vic punish the nathanael. If something bespot the belinda then it bespot the vic. If the vic bespot the nathanael and the nathanael punish the belinda then the nathanael punish the vic. If something punish the vic then the vic is lithe. The nathanael bespot the nathanael.", "logic": "\nUntested(belinda)\nBespot(belinda, vic)\nBespot(belinda, nathanael)\nPunish(belinda, vic)\nPunish(belinda, nathanael)\nWear(belinda, vic)\nWear(belinda, nathanael)\nSunburned(vic)\nPunish(vic, nathanael)\nWear(vic, belinda)\nMusty(nathanael)\nLithe(nathanael)\nBespot(nathanael, belinda)\nPunish(nathanael, vic)\nWear(nathanael, belinda)\nWear(nathanael, vic)\nforall x (Bespot(x, belinda) -> Bespot(belinda, nathanael))\nforall x (Proto(x) -> Bespot(x, vic))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) -> Punish(x, belinda))\nforall x (Punish(x, belinda) and Bespot(belinda, nathanael) -> Bespot(x, belinda))\nBespot(vic, nathanael) and Punish(nathanael, vic) -> Punish(vic, nathanael)\nforall x (Bespot(x, belinda) -> Bespot(x, vic))\nBespot(vic, nathanael) and Punish(nathanael, belinda) -> Punish(nathanael, vic)\nforall x (Punish(x, vic) -> Lithe(vic))\n\nBespot(nathanael, nathanael)\n\nBespot(nathanael, nathanael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The frances is self. The frances delineate the skye. The frances delineate the adela. The frances ensure the skye. The frances ensure the adela. The frances sulphur the skye. The frances sulphur the adela. The skye is accordant. The skye ensure the adela. The skye sulphur the frances. The adela is aweary. The adela is english. The adela delineate the frances. The adela ensure the skye. The adela sulphur the frances. The adela sulphur the skye. If something delineate the frances then the frances delineate the adela. If something is seminude then it delineate the skye. If something is accordant then it ensure the frances. If something ensure the frances and the frances delineate the adela then it delineate the frances. If the skye delineate the adela and the adela ensure the skye then the skye ensure the adela. If something delineate the frances then it delineate the skye. If the skye delineate the adela and the adela ensure the frances then the adela ensure the skye. If something ensure the skye then the skye is english. The skye does not visit the skye.", "logic": "\nSelf(frances)\nDelineate(frances, skye)\nDelineate(frances, adela)\nEnsure(frances, skye)\nEnsure(frances, adela)\nSulphur(frances, skye)\nSulphur(frances, adela)\nAccordant(skye)\nEnsure(skye, adela)\nSulphur(skye, frances)\nAweary(adela)\nEnglish(adela)\nDelineate(adela, frances)\nEnsure(adela, skye)\nSulphur(adela, frances)\nSulphur(adela, skye)\nforall x (Delineate(x, frances) -> Delineate(frances, adela))\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Delineate(x, skye))\nforall x (Accordant(x) -> Ensure(x, frances))\nforall x (Ensure(x, frances) and Delineate(frances, adela) -> Delineate(x, frances))\nDelineate(skye, adela) and Ensure(adela, skye) -> Ensure(skye, adela)\nforall x (Delineate(x, frances) -> Delineate(x, skye))\nDelineate(skye, adela) and Ensure(adela, frances) -> Ensure(adela, skye)\nforall x (Ensure(x, skye) -> English(skye))\n\nnot Sulphur(skye, skye)\n\nnot Sulphur(skye, skye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The karita is insensible. The karita calcimine the carmela. The karita calcimine the ileane. The karita embroil the carmela. The karita embroil the ileane. The karita rebuild the carmela. The karita rebuild the ileane. The carmela is jolly. The carmela embroil the ileane. The carmela rebuild the karita. The ileane is accentual. The ileane is unmalted. The ileane calcimine the karita. The ileane embroil the carmela. The ileane rebuild the karita. The ileane rebuild the carmela. If something calcimine the karita then the karita calcimine the ileane. If something is circadian then it calcimine the carmela. If something is jolly then it embroil the karita. If something embroil the karita and the karita calcimine the ileane then it calcimine the karita. If the carmela calcimine the ileane and the ileane embroil the carmela then the carmela embroil the ileane. If something calcimine the karita then it calcimine the carmela. If the carmela calcimine the ileane and the ileane embroil the karita then the ileane embroil the carmela. If something embroil the carmela then the carmela is unmalted. The karita is unmalted.", "logic": "\nInsensible(karita)\nCalcimine(karita, carmela)\nCalcimine(karita, ileane)\nEmbroil(karita, carmela)\nEmbroil(karita, ileane)\nRebuild(karita, carmela)\nRebuild(karita, ileane)\nJolly(carmela)\nEmbroil(carmela, ileane)\nRebuild(carmela, karita)\nAccentual(ileane)\nUnmalted(ileane)\nCalcimine(ileane, karita)\nEmbroil(ileane, carmela)\nRebuild(ileane, karita)\nRebuild(ileane, carmela)\nforall x (Calcimine(x, karita) -> Calcimine(karita, ileane))\nforall x (Circadian(x) -> Calcimine(x, carmela))\nforall x (Jolly(x) -> Embroil(x, karita))\nforall x (Embroil(x, karita) and Calcimine(karita, ileane) -> Calcimine(x, karita))\nCalcimine(carmela, ileane) and Embroil(ileane, carmela) -> Embroil(carmela, ileane)\nforall x (Calcimine(x, karita) -> Calcimine(x, carmela))\nCalcimine(carmela, ileane) and Embroil(ileane, karita) -> Embroil(ileane, carmela)\nforall x (Embroil(x, carmela) -> Unmalted(carmela))\n\nUnmalted(karita)\n\nUnmalted(karita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The averil is cenozoic. The averil wriggle the jerald. The averil wriggle the augustina. The averil whitewash the jerald. The averil whitewash the augustina. The averil mothproof the jerald. The averil mothproof the augustina. The jerald is trackless. The jerald whitewash the augustina. The jerald mothproof the averil. The augustina is embodied. The augustina is parotid. The augustina wriggle the averil. The augustina whitewash the jerald. The augustina mothproof the averil. The augustina mothproof the jerald. If something wriggle the averil then the averil wriggle the augustina. If something is bullnecked then it wriggle the jerald. If something is trackless then it whitewash the averil. If something whitewash the averil and the averil wriggle the augustina then it wriggle the averil. If the jerald wriggle the augustina and the augustina whitewash the jerald then the jerald whitewash the augustina. If something wriggle the averil then it wriggle the jerald. If the jerald wriggle the augustina and the augustina whitewash the averil then the augustina whitewash the jerald. If something whitewash the jerald then the jerald is parotid. The averil is not embodied.", "logic": "\nCenozoic(averil)\nWriggle(averil, jerald)\nWriggle(averil, augustina)\nWhitewash(averil, jerald)\nWhitewash(averil, augustina)\nMothproof(averil, jerald)\nMothproof(averil, augustina)\nTrackless(jerald)\nWhitewash(jerald, augustina)\nMothproof(jerald, averil)\nEmbodied(augustina)\nParotid(augustina)\nWriggle(augustina, averil)\nWhitewash(augustina, jerald)\nMothproof(augustina, averil)\nMothproof(augustina, jerald)\nforall x (Wriggle(x, averil) -> Wriggle(averil, augustina))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Wriggle(x, jerald))\nforall x (Trackless(x) -> Whitewash(x, averil))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, averil) and Wriggle(averil, augustina) -> Wriggle(x, averil))\nWriggle(jerald, augustina) and Whitewash(augustina, jerald) -> Whitewash(jerald, augustina)\nforall x (Wriggle(x, averil) -> Wriggle(x, jerald))\nWriggle(jerald, augustina) and Whitewash(augustina, averil) -> Whitewash(augustina, jerald)\nforall x (Whitewash(x, jerald) -> Parotid(jerald))\n\nnot Embodied(averil)\n\nnot Embodied(averil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The moses is webby. The moses pilot the lenette. The moses pilot the corly. The moses vroom the lenette. The moses vroom the corly. The moses bituminize the lenette. The moses bituminize the corly. The lenette is refreshing. The lenette vroom the corly. The lenette bituminize the moses. The corly is aerial. The corly is paranoid. The corly pilot the moses. The corly vroom the lenette. The corly bituminize the moses. The corly bituminize the lenette. If something pilot the moses then the moses pilot the corly. If something is venial then it pilot the lenette. If something is refreshing then it vroom the moses. If something vroom the moses and the moses pilot the corly then it pilot the moses. If the lenette pilot the corly and the corly vroom the lenette then the lenette vroom the corly. If something pilot the moses then it pilot the lenette. If the lenette pilot the corly and the corly vroom the moses then the corly vroom the lenette. If something vroom the lenette then the lenette is paranoid. The corly is refreshing.", "logic": "\nWebby(moses)\nPilot(moses, lenette)\nPilot(moses, corly)\nVroom(moses, lenette)\nVroom(moses, corly)\nBituminize(moses, lenette)\nBituminize(moses, corly)\nRefreshing(lenette)\nVroom(lenette, corly)\nBituminize(lenette, moses)\nAerial(corly)\nParanoid(corly)\nPilot(corly, moses)\nVroom(corly, lenette)\nBituminize(corly, moses)\nBituminize(corly, lenette)\nforall x (Pilot(x, moses) -> Pilot(moses, corly))\nforall x (Venial(x) -> Pilot(x, lenette))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) -> Vroom(x, moses))\nforall x (Vroom(x, moses) and Pilot(moses, corly) -> Pilot(x, moses))\nPilot(lenette, corly) and Vroom(corly, lenette) -> Vroom(lenette, corly)\nforall x (Pilot(x, moses) -> Pilot(x, lenette))\nPilot(lenette, corly) and Vroom(corly, moses) -> Vroom(corly, lenette)\nforall x (Vroom(x, lenette) -> Paranoid(lenette))\n\nRefreshing(corly)\n\nRefreshing(corly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The cathlene shimmy the northrup. The cathlene flummox the northrup. The raynell is unshaven. The raynell is glaucous. The raynell swat the northrup. The northrup shimmy the raynell. The northrup shimmy the grete. The northrup is agonising. The northrup is underwater. The northrup is glaucous. The grete is agonising. The grete is glaucous. The grete flummox the northrup. The grete swat the cathlene. The grete swat the northrup. If someone is underwater and they eat the cathlene then they are unshaven. If the cathlene is unshaven then the cathlene swat the raynell. If someone shimmy the grete and they visit the raynell then the grete shimmy the northrup. If someone shimmy the northrup and the northrup flummox the raynell then the raynell shimmy the grete. If someone swat the cathlene and the cathlene shimmy the raynell then the cathlene is glaucous. If someone is glaucous then they visit the grete. If someone is ethnic and they eat the grete then the grete is ethnic. If someone swat the grete then they eat the cathlene. The grete is glaucous.", "logic": "\nShimmy(cathlene, northrup)\nFlummox(cathlene, northrup)\nUnshaven(raynell)\nGlaucous(raynell)\nSwat(raynell, northrup)\nShimmy(northrup, raynell)\nShimmy(northrup, grete)\nAgonising(northrup)\nUnderwater(northrup)\nGlaucous(northrup)\nAgonising(grete)\nGlaucous(grete)\nFlummox(grete, northrup)\nSwat(grete, cathlene)\nSwat(grete, northrup)\nforall x (Underwater(x) and Shimmy(x, cathlene) -> Unshaven(x))\nUnshaven(cathlene) -> Swat(cathlene, raynell)\nforall x (Shimmy(x, grete) and Swat(x, raynell) -> Shimmy(grete, northrup))\nforall x (Shimmy(x, northrup) and Flummox(northrup, raynell) -> Shimmy(raynell, grete))\nforall x (Swat(x, cathlene) and Shimmy(cathlene, raynell) -> Glaucous(cathlene))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Swat(x, grete))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) and Shimmy(x, grete) -> Ethnic(grete))\nforall x (Swat(x, grete) -> Shimmy(x, cathlene))\n\nGlaucous(grete)\n\ntherefore Glaucous(grete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The viole buttweld the pierrette. The viole regenerate the pierrette. The leonerd is splayfoot. The leonerd is icebound. The leonerd airfreight the pierrette. The pierrette buttweld the leonerd. The pierrette buttweld the willa. The pierrette is tasselled. The pierrette is purposeful. The pierrette is icebound. The willa is tasselled. The willa is icebound. The willa regenerate the pierrette. The willa airfreight the viole. The willa airfreight the pierrette. If someone is purposeful and they eat the viole then they are splayfoot. If the viole is splayfoot then the viole airfreight the leonerd. If someone buttweld the willa and they visit the leonerd then the willa buttweld the pierrette. If someone buttweld the pierrette and the pierrette regenerate the leonerd then the leonerd buttweld the willa. If someone airfreight the viole and the viole buttweld the leonerd then the viole is icebound. If someone is icebound then they visit the willa. If someone is gingery and they eat the willa then the willa is gingery. If someone airfreight the willa then they eat the viole. The willa does not see the pierrette.", "logic": "\nButtweld(viole, pierrette)\nRegenerate(viole, pierrette)\nSplayfoot(leonerd)\nIcebound(leonerd)\nAirfreight(leonerd, pierrette)\nButtweld(pierrette, leonerd)\nButtweld(pierrette, willa)\nTasselled(pierrette)\nPurposeful(pierrette)\nIcebound(pierrette)\nTasselled(willa)\nIcebound(willa)\nRegenerate(willa, pierrette)\nAirfreight(willa, viole)\nAirfreight(willa, pierrette)\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and Buttweld(x, viole) -> Splayfoot(x))\nSplayfoot(viole) -> Airfreight(viole, leonerd)\nforall x (Buttweld(x, willa) and Airfreight(x, leonerd) -> Buttweld(willa, pierrette))\nforall x (Buttweld(x, pierrette) and Regenerate(pierrette, leonerd) -> Buttweld(leonerd, willa))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, viole) and Buttweld(viole, leonerd) -> Icebound(viole))\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Airfreight(x, willa))\nforall x (Gingery(x) and Buttweld(x, willa) -> Gingery(willa))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, willa) -> Buttweld(x, viole))\n\nnot Regenerate(willa, pierrette)\n\ntherefore Regenerate(willa, pierrette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The ulises pommel the renate. The ulises glue the renate. The steffie is salving. The steffie is needful. The steffie rescale the renate. The renate pommel the steffie. The renate pommel the allys. The renate is frolicsome. The renate is somnific. The renate is needful. The allys is frolicsome. The allys is needful. The allys glue the renate. The allys rescale the ulises. The allys rescale the renate. If someone is somnific and they eat the ulises then they are salving. If the ulises is salving then the ulises rescale the steffie. If someone pommel the allys and they visit the steffie then the allys pommel the renate. If someone pommel the renate and the renate glue the steffie then the steffie pommel the allys. If someone rescale the ulises and the ulises pommel the steffie then the ulises is needful. If someone is needful then they visit the allys. If someone is entitled and they eat the allys then the allys is entitled. If someone rescale the allys then they eat the ulises. The steffie rescale the allys.", "logic": "\nPommel(ulises, renate)\nGlue(ulises, renate)\nSalving(steffie)\nNeedful(steffie)\nRescale(steffie, renate)\nPommel(renate, steffie)\nPommel(renate, allys)\nFrolicsome(renate)\nSomnific(renate)\nNeedful(renate)\nFrolicsome(allys)\nNeedful(allys)\nGlue(allys, renate)\nRescale(allys, ulises)\nRescale(allys, renate)\nforall x (Somnific(x) and Pommel(x, ulises) -> Salving(x))\nSalving(ulises) -> Rescale(ulises, steffie)\nforall x (Pommel(x, allys) and Rescale(x, steffie) -> Pommel(allys, renate))\nforall x (Pommel(x, renate) and Glue(renate, steffie) -> Pommel(steffie, allys))\nforall x (Rescale(x, ulises) and Pommel(ulises, steffie) -> Needful(ulises))\nforall x (Needful(x) -> Rescale(x, allys))\nforall x (Entitled(x) and Pommel(x, allys) -> Entitled(allys))\nforall x (Rescale(x, allys) -> Pommel(x, ulises))\n\nRescale(steffie, allys)\n\nNeedful(steffie) and forall x (Needful(x) -> Rescale(x, allys)) -> therefore Rescale(steffie, allys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The gino bucket the carole. The gino misread the carole. The margarita is bimodal. The margarita is burnable. The margarita basify the carole. The carole bucket the margarita. The carole bucket the gloriane. The carole is dusty. The carole is asterisked. The carole is burnable. The gloriane is dusty. The gloriane is burnable. The gloriane misread the carole. The gloriane basify the gino. The gloriane basify the carole. If someone is asterisked and they eat the gino then they are bimodal. If the gino is bimodal then the gino basify the margarita. If someone bucket the gloriane and they visit the margarita then the gloriane bucket the carole. If someone bucket the carole and the carole misread the margarita then the margarita bucket the gloriane. If someone basify the gino and the gino bucket the margarita then the gino is burnable. If someone is burnable then they visit the gloriane. If someone is lissome and they eat the gloriane then the gloriane is lissome. If someone basify the gloriane then they eat the gino. The gloriane does not visit the gloriane.", "logic": "\nBucket(gino, carole)\nMisread(gino, carole)\nBimodal(margarita)\nBurnable(margarita)\nBasify(margarita, carole)\nBucket(carole, margarita)\nBucket(carole, gloriane)\nDusty(carole)\nAsterisked(carole)\nBurnable(carole)\nDusty(gloriane)\nBurnable(gloriane)\nMisread(gloriane, carole)\nBasify(gloriane, gino)\nBasify(gloriane, carole)\nforall x (Asterisked(x) and Bucket(x, gino) -> Bimodal(x))\nBimodal(gino) -> Basify(gino, margarita)\nforall x (Bucket(x, gloriane) and Basify(x, margarita) -> Bucket(gloriane, carole))\nforall x (Bucket(x, carole) and Misread(carole, margarita) -> Bucket(margarita, gloriane))\nforall x (Basify(x, gino) and Bucket(gino, margarita) -> Burnable(gino))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Basify(x, gloriane))\nforall x (Lissome(x) and Bucket(x, gloriane) -> Lissome(gloriane))\nforall x (Basify(x, gloriane) -> Bucket(x, gino))\n\nnot Basify(gloriane, gloriane)\n\nBurnable(gloriane) and forall x (Burnable(x) -> Basify(x, gloriane)) -> therefore Basify(gloriane, gloriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The nikoletta powderize the lillian. The nikoletta gelatinize the lillian. The shea is hindustani. The shea is unranked. The shea conciliate the lillian. The lillian powderize the shea. The lillian powderize the tessi. The lillian is main. The lillian is vermiform. The lillian is unranked. The tessi is main. The tessi is unranked. The tessi gelatinize the lillian. The tessi conciliate the nikoletta. The tessi conciliate the lillian. If someone is vermiform and they eat the nikoletta then they are hindustani. If the nikoletta is hindustani then the nikoletta conciliate the shea. If someone powderize the tessi and they visit the shea then the tessi powderize the lillian. If someone powderize the lillian and the lillian gelatinize the shea then the shea powderize the tessi. If someone conciliate the nikoletta and the nikoletta powderize the shea then the nikoletta is unranked. If someone is unranked then they visit the tessi. If someone is cannibalic and they eat the tessi then the tessi is cannibalic. If someone conciliate the tessi then they eat the nikoletta. The shea powderize the nikoletta.", "logic": "\nPowderize(nikoletta, lillian)\nGelatinize(nikoletta, lillian)\nHindustani(shea)\nUnranked(shea)\nConciliate(shea, lillian)\nPowderize(lillian, shea)\nPowderize(lillian, tessi)\nMain(lillian)\nVermiform(lillian)\nUnranked(lillian)\nMain(tessi)\nUnranked(tessi)\nGelatinize(tessi, lillian)\nConciliate(tessi, nikoletta)\nConciliate(tessi, lillian)\nforall x (Vermiform(x) and Powderize(x, nikoletta) -> Hindustani(x))\nHindustani(nikoletta) -> Conciliate(nikoletta, shea)\nforall x (Powderize(x, tessi) and Conciliate(x, shea) -> Powderize(tessi, lillian))\nforall x (Powderize(x, lillian) and Gelatinize(lillian, shea) -> Powderize(shea, tessi))\nforall x (Conciliate(x, nikoletta) and Powderize(nikoletta, shea) -> Unranked(nikoletta))\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> Conciliate(x, tessi))\nforall x (Cannibalic(x) and Powderize(x, tessi) -> Cannibalic(tessi))\nforall x (Conciliate(x, tessi) -> Powderize(x, nikoletta))\n\nPowderize(shea, nikoletta)\n\nUnranked(shea) and forall x (Unranked(x) -> Conciliate(x, tessi)) -> therefore Conciliate(shea, tessi) Conciliate(shea, tessi) and forall x (Conciliate(x, tessi) -> Powderize(x, nikoletta)) -> therefore Powderize(shea, nikoletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The shaughn reprize the elly. The shaughn brad the elly. The joselyn is plumlike. The joselyn is drugless. The joselyn mimeo the elly. The elly reprize the joselyn. The elly reprize the junia. The elly is unlicenced. The elly is untimely. The elly is drugless. The junia is unlicenced. The junia is drugless. The junia brad the elly. The junia mimeo the shaughn. The junia mimeo the elly. If someone is untimely and they eat the shaughn then they are plumlike. If the shaughn is plumlike then the shaughn mimeo the joselyn. If someone reprize the junia and they visit the joselyn then the junia reprize the elly. If someone reprize the elly and the elly brad the joselyn then the joselyn reprize the junia. If someone mimeo the shaughn and the shaughn reprize the joselyn then the shaughn is drugless. If someone is drugless then they visit the junia. If someone is inoperable and they eat the junia then the junia is inoperable. If someone mimeo the junia then they eat the shaughn. The joselyn does not eat the shaughn.", "logic": "\nReprize(shaughn, elly)\nBrad(shaughn, elly)\nPlumlike(joselyn)\nDrugless(joselyn)\nMimeo(joselyn, elly)\nReprize(elly, joselyn)\nReprize(elly, junia)\nUnlicenced(elly)\nUntimely(elly)\nDrugless(elly)\nUnlicenced(junia)\nDrugless(junia)\nBrad(junia, elly)\nMimeo(junia, shaughn)\nMimeo(junia, elly)\nforall x (Untimely(x) and Reprize(x, shaughn) -> Plumlike(x))\nPlumlike(shaughn) -> Mimeo(shaughn, joselyn)\nforall x (Reprize(x, junia) and Mimeo(x, joselyn) -> Reprize(junia, elly))\nforall x (Reprize(x, elly) and Brad(elly, joselyn) -> Reprize(joselyn, junia))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, shaughn) and Reprize(shaughn, joselyn) -> Drugless(shaughn))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Mimeo(x, junia))\nforall x (Inoperable(x) and Reprize(x, junia) -> Inoperable(junia))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, junia) -> Reprize(x, shaughn))\n\nnot Reprize(joselyn, shaughn)\n\nDrugless(joselyn) and forall x (Drugless(x) -> Mimeo(x, junia)) -> therefore Mimeo(joselyn, junia) Mimeo(joselyn, junia) and forall x (Mimeo(x, junia) -> Reprize(x, shaughn)) -> therefore Reprize(joselyn, shaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The melanie petition the kaitlin. The melanie slander the kaitlin. The joletta is mutant. The joletta is scriptural. The joletta squeeze the kaitlin. The kaitlin petition the joletta. The kaitlin petition the min. The kaitlin is bicolored. The kaitlin is avertible. The kaitlin is scriptural. The min is bicolored. The min is scriptural. The min slander the kaitlin. The min squeeze the melanie. The min squeeze the kaitlin. If someone is avertible and they eat the melanie then they are mutant. If the melanie is mutant then the melanie squeeze the joletta. If someone petition the min and they visit the joletta then the min petition the kaitlin. If someone petition the kaitlin and the kaitlin slander the joletta then the joletta petition the min. If someone squeeze the melanie and the melanie petition the joletta then the melanie is scriptural. If someone is scriptural then they visit the min. If someone is surpliced and they eat the min then the min is surpliced. If someone squeeze the min then they eat the melanie. The kaitlin is mutant.", "logic": "\nPetition(melanie, kaitlin)\nSlander(melanie, kaitlin)\nMutant(joletta)\nScriptural(joletta)\nSqueeze(joletta, kaitlin)\nPetition(kaitlin, joletta)\nPetition(kaitlin, min)\nBicolored(kaitlin)\nAvertible(kaitlin)\nScriptural(kaitlin)\nBicolored(min)\nScriptural(min)\nSlander(min, kaitlin)\nSqueeze(min, melanie)\nSqueeze(min, kaitlin)\nforall x (Avertible(x) and Petition(x, melanie) -> Mutant(x))\nMutant(melanie) -> Squeeze(melanie, joletta)\nforall x (Petition(x, min) and Squeeze(x, joletta) -> Petition(min, kaitlin))\nforall x (Petition(x, kaitlin) and Slander(kaitlin, joletta) -> Petition(joletta, min))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, melanie) and Petition(melanie, joletta) -> Scriptural(melanie))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) -> Squeeze(x, min))\nforall x (Surpliced(x) and Petition(x, min) -> Surpliced(min))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, min) -> Petition(x, melanie))\n\nMutant(kaitlin)\n\nScriptural(kaitlin) and forall x (Scriptural(x) -> Squeeze(x, min)) -> therefore Squeeze(kaitlin, min) Squeeze(kaitlin, min) and forall x (Squeeze(x, min) -> Petition(x, melanie)) -> therefore Petition(kaitlin, melanie) Avertible(kaitlin) and Petition(kaitlin, melanie) and forall x (Avertible(x) and Petition(x, melanie) -> Mutant(x)) -> therefore Mutant(kaitlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The thaxter repine the melly. The thaxter mimic the melly. The donia is morose. The donia is gloveless. The donia talk the melly. The melly repine the donia. The melly repine the georgia. The melly is judicable. The melly is unservile. The melly is gloveless. The georgia is judicable. The georgia is gloveless. The georgia mimic the melly. The georgia talk the thaxter. The georgia talk the melly. If someone is unservile and they eat the thaxter then they are morose. If the thaxter is morose then the thaxter talk the donia. If someone repine the georgia and they visit the donia then the georgia repine the melly. If someone repine the melly and the melly mimic the donia then the donia repine the georgia. If someone talk the thaxter and the thaxter repine the donia then the thaxter is gloveless. If someone is gloveless then they visit the georgia. If someone is nicaraguan and they eat the georgia then the georgia is nicaraguan. If someone talk the georgia then they eat the thaxter. The melly is not morose.", "logic": "\nRepine(thaxter, melly)\nMimic(thaxter, melly)\nMorose(donia)\nGloveless(donia)\nTalk(donia, melly)\nRepine(melly, donia)\nRepine(melly, georgia)\nJudicable(melly)\nUnservile(melly)\nGloveless(melly)\nJudicable(georgia)\nGloveless(georgia)\nMimic(georgia, melly)\nTalk(georgia, thaxter)\nTalk(georgia, melly)\nforall x (Unservile(x) and Repine(x, thaxter) -> Morose(x))\nMorose(thaxter) -> Talk(thaxter, donia)\nforall x (Repine(x, georgia) and Talk(x, donia) -> Repine(georgia, melly))\nforall x (Repine(x, melly) and Mimic(melly, donia) -> Repine(donia, georgia))\nforall x (Talk(x, thaxter) and Repine(thaxter, donia) -> Gloveless(thaxter))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> Talk(x, georgia))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) and Repine(x, georgia) -> Nicaraguan(georgia))\nforall x (Talk(x, georgia) -> Repine(x, thaxter))\n\nnot Morose(melly)\n\nGloveless(melly) and forall x (Gloveless(x) -> Talk(x, georgia)) -> therefore Talk(melly, georgia) Talk(melly, georgia) and forall x (Talk(x, georgia) -> Repine(x, thaxter)) -> therefore Repine(melly, thaxter) Unservile(melly) and Repine(melly, thaxter) and forall x (Unservile(x) and Repine(x, thaxter) -> Morose(x)) -> therefore Morose(melly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The mellissa starve the felipa. The mellissa inscribe the felipa. The delcina is addable. The delcina is bigeneric. The delcina offer the felipa. The felipa starve the delcina. The felipa starve the will. The felipa is lumbar. The felipa is noncausal. The felipa is bigeneric. The will is lumbar. The will is bigeneric. The will inscribe the felipa. The will offer the mellissa. The will offer the felipa. If someone is noncausal and they eat the mellissa then they are addable. If the mellissa is addable then the mellissa offer the delcina. If someone starve the will and they visit the delcina then the will starve the felipa. If someone starve the felipa and the felipa inscribe the delcina then the delcina starve the will. If someone offer the mellissa and the mellissa starve the delcina then the mellissa is bigeneric. If someone is bigeneric then they visit the will. If someone is lxxvii and they eat the will then the will is lxxvii. If someone offer the will then they eat the mellissa. The mellissa does not visit the delcina.", "logic": "\nStarve(mellissa, felipa)\nInscribe(mellissa, felipa)\nAddable(delcina)\nBigeneric(delcina)\nOffer(delcina, felipa)\nStarve(felipa, delcina)\nStarve(felipa, will)\nLumbar(felipa)\nNoncausal(felipa)\nBigeneric(felipa)\nLumbar(will)\nBigeneric(will)\nInscribe(will, felipa)\nOffer(will, mellissa)\nOffer(will, felipa)\nforall x (Noncausal(x) and Starve(x, mellissa) -> Addable(x))\nAddable(mellissa) -> Offer(mellissa, delcina)\nforall x (Starve(x, will) and Offer(x, delcina) -> Starve(will, felipa))\nforall x (Starve(x, felipa) and Inscribe(felipa, delcina) -> Starve(delcina, will))\nforall x (Offer(x, mellissa) and Starve(mellissa, delcina) -> Bigeneric(mellissa))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Offer(x, will))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) and Starve(x, will) -> Lxxvii(will))\nforall x (Offer(x, will) -> Starve(x, mellissa))\n\nnot Offer(mellissa, delcina)\n\nAddable(mellissa) -> Offer(mellissa, delcina) <- forall x (Noncausal(x) and Starve(x, mellissa) -> Addable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The corinne misjudge the karyn. The corinne unfurl the karyn. The gregorio is automotive. The gregorio is hulky. The gregorio exorcize the karyn. The karyn misjudge the gregorio. The karyn misjudge the clemmie. The karyn is unplaced. The karyn is such. The karyn is hulky. The clemmie is unplaced. The clemmie is hulky. The clemmie unfurl the karyn. The clemmie exorcize the corinne. The clemmie exorcize the karyn. If someone is such and they eat the corinne then they are automotive. If the corinne is automotive then the corinne exorcize the gregorio. If someone misjudge the clemmie and they visit the gregorio then the clemmie misjudge the karyn. If someone misjudge the karyn and the karyn unfurl the gregorio then the gregorio misjudge the clemmie. If someone exorcize the corinne and the corinne misjudge the gregorio then the corinne is hulky. If someone is hulky then they visit the clemmie. If someone is afebrile and they eat the clemmie then the clemmie is afebrile. If someone exorcize the clemmie then they eat the corinne. The clemmie is automotive.", "logic": "\nMisjudge(corinne, karyn)\nUnfurl(corinne, karyn)\nAutomotive(gregorio)\nHulky(gregorio)\nExorcize(gregorio, karyn)\nMisjudge(karyn, gregorio)\nMisjudge(karyn, clemmie)\nUnplaced(karyn)\nSuch(karyn)\nHulky(karyn)\nUnplaced(clemmie)\nHulky(clemmie)\nUnfurl(clemmie, karyn)\nExorcize(clemmie, corinne)\nExorcize(clemmie, karyn)\nforall x (Such(x) and Misjudge(x, corinne) -> Automotive(x))\nAutomotive(corinne) -> Exorcize(corinne, gregorio)\nforall x (Misjudge(x, clemmie) and Exorcize(x, gregorio) -> Misjudge(clemmie, karyn))\nforall x (Misjudge(x, karyn) and Unfurl(karyn, gregorio) -> Misjudge(gregorio, clemmie))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, corinne) and Misjudge(corinne, gregorio) -> Hulky(corinne))\nforall x (Hulky(x) -> Exorcize(x, clemmie))\nforall x (Afebrile(x) and Misjudge(x, clemmie) -> Afebrile(clemmie))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, clemmie) -> Misjudge(x, corinne))\n\nAutomotive(clemmie)\n\nforall x (Such(x) and Misjudge(x, corinne) -> Automotive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The fayina arrest the web. The fayina stucco the web. The dorelia is unexplored. The dorelia is brindled. The dorelia fructify the web. The web arrest the dorelia. The web arrest the nova. The web is fungoid. The web is subsidised. The web is brindled. The nova is fungoid. The nova is brindled. The nova stucco the web. The nova fructify the fayina. The nova fructify the web. If someone is subsidised and they eat the fayina then they are unexplored. If the fayina is unexplored then the fayina fructify the dorelia. If someone arrest the nova and they visit the dorelia then the nova arrest the web. If someone arrest the web and the web stucco the dorelia then the dorelia arrest the nova. If someone fructify the fayina and the fayina arrest the dorelia then the fayina is brindled. If someone is brindled then they visit the nova. If someone is duodenal and they eat the nova then the nova is duodenal. If someone fructify the nova then they eat the fayina. The fayina does not visit the nova.", "logic": "\nArrest(fayina, web)\nStucco(fayina, web)\nUnexplored(dorelia)\nBrindled(dorelia)\nFructify(dorelia, web)\nArrest(web, dorelia)\nArrest(web, nova)\nFungoid(web)\nSubsidised(web)\nBrindled(web)\nFungoid(nova)\nBrindled(nova)\nStucco(nova, web)\nFructify(nova, fayina)\nFructify(nova, web)\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Arrest(x, fayina) -> Unexplored(x))\nUnexplored(fayina) -> Fructify(fayina, dorelia)\nforall x (Arrest(x, nova) and Fructify(x, dorelia) -> Arrest(nova, web))\nforall x (Arrest(x, web) and Stucco(web, dorelia) -> Arrest(dorelia, nova))\nforall x (Fructify(x, fayina) and Arrest(fayina, dorelia) -> Brindled(fayina))\nforall x (Brindled(x) -> Fructify(x, nova))\nforall x (Duodenal(x) and Arrest(x, nova) -> Duodenal(nova))\nforall x (Fructify(x, nova) -> Arrest(x, fayina))\n\nnot Fructify(fayina, nova)\n\nforall x (Brindled(x) -> Fructify(x, nova)) <- forall x (Fructify(x, fayina) and Arrest(fayina, dorelia) -> Brindled(fayina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The gabrila rarefy the penelope. The gabrila conspire the penelope. The francisco is later. The francisco is aspheric. The francisco dandle the penelope. The penelope rarefy the francisco. The penelope rarefy the winfield. The penelope is confluent. The penelope is recovering. The penelope is aspheric. The winfield is confluent. The winfield is aspheric. The winfield conspire the penelope. The winfield dandle the gabrila. The winfield dandle the penelope. If someone is recovering and they eat the gabrila then they are later. If the gabrila is later then the gabrila dandle the francisco. If someone rarefy the winfield and they visit the francisco then the winfield rarefy the penelope. If someone rarefy the penelope and the penelope conspire the francisco then the francisco rarefy the winfield. If someone dandle the gabrila and the gabrila rarefy the francisco then the gabrila is aspheric. If someone is aspheric then they visit the winfield. If someone is acidulent and they eat the winfield then the winfield is acidulent. If someone dandle the winfield then they eat the gabrila. The winfield is acidulent.", "logic": "\nRarefy(gabrila, penelope)\nConspire(gabrila, penelope)\nLater(francisco)\nAspheric(francisco)\nDandle(francisco, penelope)\nRarefy(penelope, francisco)\nRarefy(penelope, winfield)\nConfluent(penelope)\nRecovering(penelope)\nAspheric(penelope)\nConfluent(winfield)\nAspheric(winfield)\nConspire(winfield, penelope)\nDandle(winfield, gabrila)\nDandle(winfield, penelope)\nforall x (Recovering(x) and Rarefy(x, gabrila) -> Later(x))\nLater(gabrila) -> Dandle(gabrila, francisco)\nforall x (Rarefy(x, winfield) and Dandle(x, francisco) -> Rarefy(winfield, penelope))\nforall x (Rarefy(x, penelope) and Conspire(penelope, francisco) -> Rarefy(francisco, winfield))\nforall x (Dandle(x, gabrila) and Rarefy(gabrila, francisco) -> Aspheric(gabrila))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> Dandle(x, winfield))\nforall x (Acidulent(x) and Rarefy(x, winfield) -> Acidulent(winfield))\nforall x (Dandle(x, winfield) -> Rarefy(x, gabrila))\n\nAcidulent(winfield)\n\nforall x (Acidulent(x) and Rarefy(x, winfield) -> Acidulent(winfield)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The chas welcome the garfinkel. The chas found the garfinkel. The elfrida is buttony. The elfrida is ascendent. The elfrida bucket the garfinkel. The garfinkel welcome the elfrida. The garfinkel welcome the heddi. The garfinkel is patented. The garfinkel is necked. The garfinkel is ascendent. The heddi is patented. The heddi is ascendent. The heddi found the garfinkel. The heddi bucket the chas. The heddi bucket the garfinkel. If someone is necked and they eat the chas then they are buttony. If the chas is buttony then the chas bucket the elfrida. If someone welcome the heddi and they visit the elfrida then the heddi welcome the garfinkel. If someone welcome the garfinkel and the garfinkel found the elfrida then the elfrida welcome the heddi. If someone bucket the chas and the chas welcome the elfrida then the chas is ascendent. If someone is ascendent then they visit the heddi. If someone is squirting and they eat the heddi then the heddi is squirting. If someone bucket the heddi then they eat the chas. The heddi is not necked.", "logic": "\nWelcome(chas, garfinkel)\nFound(chas, garfinkel)\nButtony(elfrida)\nAscendent(elfrida)\nBucket(elfrida, garfinkel)\nWelcome(garfinkel, elfrida)\nWelcome(garfinkel, heddi)\nPatented(garfinkel)\nNecked(garfinkel)\nAscendent(garfinkel)\nPatented(heddi)\nAscendent(heddi)\nFound(heddi, garfinkel)\nBucket(heddi, chas)\nBucket(heddi, garfinkel)\nforall x (Necked(x) and Welcome(x, chas) -> Buttony(x))\nButtony(chas) -> Bucket(chas, elfrida)\nforall x (Welcome(x, heddi) and Bucket(x, elfrida) -> Welcome(heddi, garfinkel))\nforall x (Welcome(x, garfinkel) and Found(garfinkel, elfrida) -> Welcome(elfrida, heddi))\nforall x (Bucket(x, chas) and Welcome(chas, elfrida) -> Ascendent(chas))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> Bucket(x, heddi))\nforall x (Squirting(x) and Welcome(x, heddi) -> Squirting(heddi))\nforall x (Bucket(x, heddi) -> Welcome(x, chas))\n\nnot Necked(heddi)\n\nnot Necked(heddi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The ginger skin the devinne. The ginger clerk the devinne. The mireielle is common. The mireielle is suety. The mireielle nasalize the devinne. The devinne skin the mireielle. The devinne skin the deny. The devinne is loyal. The devinne is catkinate. The devinne is suety. The deny is loyal. The deny is suety. The deny clerk the devinne. The deny nasalize the ginger. The deny nasalize the devinne. If someone is catkinate and they eat the ginger then they are common. If the ginger is common then the ginger nasalize the mireielle. If someone skin the deny and they visit the mireielle then the deny skin the devinne. If someone skin the devinne and the devinne clerk the mireielle then the mireielle skin the deny. If someone nasalize the ginger and the ginger skin the mireielle then the ginger is suety. If someone is suety then they visit the deny. If someone is camp and they eat the deny then the deny is camp. If someone nasalize the deny then they eat the ginger. The mireielle is catkinate.", "logic": "\nSkin(ginger, devinne)\nClerk(ginger, devinne)\nCommon(mireielle)\nSuety(mireielle)\nNasalize(mireielle, devinne)\nSkin(devinne, mireielle)\nSkin(devinne, deny)\nLoyal(devinne)\nCatkinate(devinne)\nSuety(devinne)\nLoyal(deny)\nSuety(deny)\nClerk(deny, devinne)\nNasalize(deny, ginger)\nNasalize(deny, devinne)\nforall x (Catkinate(x) and Skin(x, ginger) -> Common(x))\nCommon(ginger) -> Nasalize(ginger, mireielle)\nforall x (Skin(x, deny) and Nasalize(x, mireielle) -> Skin(deny, devinne))\nforall x (Skin(x, devinne) and Clerk(devinne, mireielle) -> Skin(mireielle, deny))\nforall x (Nasalize(x, ginger) and Skin(ginger, mireielle) -> Suety(ginger))\nforall x (Suety(x) -> Nasalize(x, deny))\nforall x (Camp(x) and Skin(x, deny) -> Camp(deny))\nforall x (Nasalize(x, deny) -> Skin(x, ginger))\n\nCatkinate(mireielle)\n\nCatkinate(mireielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The cyb company the kellen. The cyb presuppose the kellen. The bee is highbrowed. The bee is splenetic. The bee revitalise the kellen. The kellen company the bee. The kellen company the sibylla. The kellen is roughish. The kellen is costive. The kellen is splenetic. The sibylla is roughish. The sibylla is splenetic. The sibylla presuppose the kellen. The sibylla revitalise the cyb. The sibylla revitalise the kellen. If someone is costive and they eat the cyb then they are highbrowed. If the cyb is highbrowed then the cyb revitalise the bee. If someone company the sibylla and they visit the bee then the sibylla company the kellen. If someone company the kellen and the kellen presuppose the bee then the bee company the sibylla. If someone revitalise the cyb and the cyb company the bee then the cyb is splenetic. If someone is splenetic then they visit the sibylla. If someone is ducal and they eat the sibylla then the sibylla is ducal. If someone revitalise the sibylla then they eat the cyb. The bee does not see the bee.", "logic": "\nCompany(cyb, kellen)\nPresuppose(cyb, kellen)\nHighbrowed(bee)\nSplenetic(bee)\nRevitalise(bee, kellen)\nCompany(kellen, bee)\nCompany(kellen, sibylla)\nRoughish(kellen)\nCostive(kellen)\nSplenetic(kellen)\nRoughish(sibylla)\nSplenetic(sibylla)\nPresuppose(sibylla, kellen)\nRevitalise(sibylla, cyb)\nRevitalise(sibylla, kellen)\nforall x (Costive(x) and Company(x, cyb) -> Highbrowed(x))\nHighbrowed(cyb) -> Revitalise(cyb, bee)\nforall x (Company(x, sibylla) and Revitalise(x, bee) -> Company(sibylla, kellen))\nforall x (Company(x, kellen) and Presuppose(kellen, bee) -> Company(bee, sibylla))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, cyb) and Company(cyb, bee) -> Splenetic(cyb))\nforall x (Splenetic(x) -> Revitalise(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Ducal(x) and Company(x, sibylla) -> Ducal(sibylla))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, sibylla) -> Company(x, cyb))\n\nnot Presuppose(bee, bee)\n\nnot Presuppose(bee, bee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The fanchette espy the leticia. The fanchette calve the leticia. The hollie is fisheye. The hollie is gutsy. The hollie edulcorate the leticia. The leticia espy the hollie. The leticia espy the andrzej. The leticia is pilotless. The leticia is dissipated. The leticia is gutsy. The andrzej is pilotless. The andrzej is gutsy. The andrzej calve the leticia. The andrzej edulcorate the fanchette. The andrzej edulcorate the leticia. If someone is dissipated and they eat the fanchette then they are fisheye. If the fanchette is fisheye then the fanchette edulcorate the hollie. If someone espy the andrzej and they visit the hollie then the andrzej espy the leticia. If someone espy the leticia and the leticia calve the hollie then the hollie espy the andrzej. If someone edulcorate the fanchette and the fanchette espy the hollie then the fanchette is gutsy. If someone is gutsy then they visit the andrzej. If someone is harrowing and they eat the andrzej then the andrzej is harrowing. If someone edulcorate the andrzej then they eat the fanchette. The leticia calve the leticia.", "logic": "\nEspy(fanchette, leticia)\nCalve(fanchette, leticia)\nFisheye(hollie)\nGutsy(hollie)\nEdulcorate(hollie, leticia)\nEspy(leticia, hollie)\nEspy(leticia, andrzej)\nPilotless(leticia)\nDissipated(leticia)\nGutsy(leticia)\nPilotless(andrzej)\nGutsy(andrzej)\nCalve(andrzej, leticia)\nEdulcorate(andrzej, fanchette)\nEdulcorate(andrzej, leticia)\nforall x (Dissipated(x) and Espy(x, fanchette) -> Fisheye(x))\nFisheye(fanchette) -> Edulcorate(fanchette, hollie)\nforall x (Espy(x, andrzej) and Edulcorate(x, hollie) -> Espy(andrzej, leticia))\nforall x (Espy(x, leticia) and Calve(leticia, hollie) -> Espy(hollie, andrzej))\nforall x (Edulcorate(x, fanchette) and Espy(fanchette, hollie) -> Gutsy(fanchette))\nforall x (Gutsy(x) -> Edulcorate(x, andrzej))\nforall x (Harrowing(x) and Espy(x, andrzej) -> Harrowing(andrzej))\nforall x (Edulcorate(x, andrzej) -> Espy(x, fanchette))\n\nCalve(leticia, leticia)\n\nCalve(leticia, leticia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The zelma preserve the zea. The jemie peer the zelma. The benjie peer the jemie. The zea is caucasoid. If the zelma peer the benjie and the benjie is caucasoid then the benjie liquidize the zea. If someone is caucasoid then they see the benjie. If someone peer the benjie and they eat the zea then they see the zelma. If the jemie liquidize the benjie and the jemie is liverish then the benjie peer the jemie. If someone liquidize the zelma and they are caucasoid then the zelma liquidize the benjie. Blue people are caucasoid. If someone peer the zelma then the zelma is judicious. If someone peer the zea and they eat the zelma then they are judicious. The zea is caucasoid.", "logic": "\nPreserve(zelma, zea)\nPeer(jemie, zelma)\nPeer(benjie, jemie)\nCaucasoid(zea)\nPeer(zelma, benjie) and Caucasoid(benjie) -> Liquidize(benjie, zea)\nforall x (Caucasoid(x) -> Liquidize(x, benjie))\nforall x (Peer(x, benjie) and Peer(x, zea) -> Liquidize(x, zelma))\nLiquidize(jemie, benjie) and Liverish(jemie) -> Peer(benjie, jemie)\nforall x (Liquidize(x, zelma) and Caucasoid(x) -> Liquidize(zelma, benjie))\nforall x (Judicious(x) -> Caucasoid(x))\nforall x (Peer(x, zelma) -> Judicious(zelma))\nforall x (Peer(x, zea) and Peer(x, zelma) -> Judicious(x))\n\nCaucasoid(zea)\n\ntherefore Caucasoid(zea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The marna overburden the chriss. The rubi enrapture the marna. The waiter enrapture the rubi. The chriss is meditative. If the marna enrapture the waiter and the waiter is meditative then the waiter metricize the chriss. If someone is meditative then they see the waiter. If someone enrapture the waiter and they eat the chriss then they see the marna. If the rubi metricize the waiter and the rubi is fawning then the waiter enrapture the rubi. If someone metricize the marna and they are meditative then the marna metricize the waiter. Blue people are meditative. If someone enrapture the marna then the marna is azoic. If someone enrapture the chriss and they eat the marna then they are azoic. The chriss is not meditative.", "logic": "\nOverburden(marna, chriss)\nEnrapture(rubi, marna)\nEnrapture(waiter, rubi)\nMeditative(chriss)\nEnrapture(marna, waiter) and Meditative(waiter) -> Metricize(waiter, chriss)\nforall x (Meditative(x) -> Metricize(x, waiter))\nforall x (Enrapture(x, waiter) and Enrapture(x, chriss) -> Metricize(x, marna))\nMetricize(rubi, waiter) and Fawning(rubi) -> Enrapture(waiter, rubi)\nforall x (Metricize(x, marna) and Meditative(x) -> Metricize(marna, waiter))\nforall x (Azoic(x) -> Meditative(x))\nforall x (Enrapture(x, marna) -> Azoic(marna))\nforall x (Enrapture(x, chriss) and Enrapture(x, marna) -> Azoic(x))\n\nnot Meditative(chriss)\n\ntherefore Meditative(chriss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The robbin muse the aubrey. The guinna censure the robbin. The velma censure the guinna. The aubrey is paved. If the robbin censure the velma and the velma is paved then the velma prepay the aubrey. If someone is paved then they see the velma. If someone censure the velma and they eat the aubrey then they see the robbin. If the guinna prepay the velma and the guinna is filiform then the velma censure the guinna. If someone prepay the robbin and they are paved then the robbin prepay the velma. Blue people are paved. If someone censure the robbin then the robbin is upstage. If someone censure the aubrey and they eat the robbin then they are upstage. The aubrey prepay the velma.", "logic": "\nMuse(robbin, aubrey)\nCensure(guinna, robbin)\nCensure(velma, guinna)\nPaved(aubrey)\nCensure(robbin, velma) and Paved(velma) -> Prepay(velma, aubrey)\nforall x (Paved(x) -> Prepay(x, velma))\nforall x (Censure(x, velma) and Censure(x, aubrey) -> Prepay(x, robbin))\nPrepay(guinna, velma) and Filiform(guinna) -> Censure(velma, guinna)\nforall x (Prepay(x, robbin) and Paved(x) -> Prepay(robbin, velma))\nforall x (Upstage(x) -> Paved(x))\nforall x (Censure(x, robbin) -> Upstage(robbin))\nforall x (Censure(x, aubrey) and Censure(x, robbin) -> Upstage(x))\n\nPrepay(aubrey, velma)\n\nPaved(aubrey) and forall x (Paved(x) -> Prepay(x, velma)) -> therefore Prepay(aubrey, velma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The jenica descale the alene. The philipa blemish the jenica. The hilliard blemish the philipa. The alene is marital. If the jenica blemish the hilliard and the hilliard is marital then the hilliard sideline the alene. If someone is marital then they see the hilliard. If someone blemish the hilliard and they eat the alene then they see the jenica. If the philipa sideline the hilliard and the philipa is struck then the hilliard blemish the philipa. If someone sideline the jenica and they are marital then the jenica sideline the hilliard. Blue people are marital. If someone blemish the jenica then the jenica is gummed. If someone blemish the alene and they eat the jenica then they are gummed. The alene does not see the hilliard.", "logic": "\nDescale(jenica, alene)\nBlemish(philipa, jenica)\nBlemish(hilliard, philipa)\nMarital(alene)\nBlemish(jenica, hilliard) and Marital(hilliard) -> Sideline(hilliard, alene)\nforall x (Marital(x) -> Sideline(x, hilliard))\nforall x (Blemish(x, hilliard) and Blemish(x, alene) -> Sideline(x, jenica))\nSideline(philipa, hilliard) and Struck(philipa) -> Blemish(hilliard, philipa)\nforall x (Sideline(x, jenica) and Marital(x) -> Sideline(jenica, hilliard))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Blemish(x, jenica) -> Gummed(jenica))\nforall x (Blemish(x, alene) and Blemish(x, jenica) -> Gummed(x))\n\nnot Sideline(alene, hilliard)\n\nMarital(alene) and forall x (Marital(x) -> Sideline(x, hilliard)) -> therefore Sideline(alene, hilliard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The kizzee swim the lyndsay. The noel damp the kizzee. The nathalia damp the noel. The lyndsay is labelled. If the kizzee damp the nathalia and the nathalia is labelled then the nathalia queue the lyndsay. If someone is labelled then they see the nathalia. If someone damp the nathalia and they eat the lyndsay then they see the kizzee. If the noel queue the nathalia and the noel is oblate then the nathalia damp the noel. If someone queue the kizzee and they are labelled then the kizzee queue the nathalia. Blue people are labelled. If someone damp the kizzee then the kizzee is ectopic. If someone damp the lyndsay and they eat the kizzee then they are ectopic. The kizzee is labelled.", "logic": "\nSwim(kizzee, lyndsay)\nDamp(noel, kizzee)\nDamp(nathalia, noel)\nLabelled(lyndsay)\nDamp(kizzee, nathalia) and Labelled(nathalia) -> Queue(nathalia, lyndsay)\nforall x (Labelled(x) -> Queue(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Damp(x, nathalia) and Damp(x, lyndsay) -> Queue(x, kizzee))\nQueue(noel, nathalia) and Oblate(noel) -> Damp(nathalia, noel)\nforall x (Queue(x, kizzee) and Labelled(x) -> Queue(kizzee, nathalia))\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Labelled(x))\nforall x (Damp(x, kizzee) -> Ectopic(kizzee))\nforall x (Damp(x, lyndsay) and Damp(x, kizzee) -> Ectopic(x))\n\nLabelled(kizzee)\n\nDamp(noel, kizzee) and forall x (Damp(x, kizzee) -> Ectopic(kizzee)) -> therefore Ectopic(kizzee) Ectopic(kizzee) and forall x (Ectopic(x) -> Labelled(x)) -> therefore Labelled(kizzee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The wilson metalize the tanny. The hermon gasify the wilson. The lavina gasify the hermon. The tanny is organismic. If the wilson gasify the lavina and the lavina is organismic then the lavina take the tanny. If someone is organismic then they see the lavina. If someone gasify the lavina and they eat the tanny then they see the wilson. If the hermon take the lavina and the hermon is libidinal then the lavina gasify the hermon. If someone take the wilson and they are organismic then the wilson take the lavina. Blue people are organismic. If someone gasify the wilson then the wilson is mellow. If someone gasify the tanny and they eat the wilson then they are mellow. The wilson is not organismic.", "logic": "\nMetalize(wilson, tanny)\nGasify(hermon, wilson)\nGasify(lavina, hermon)\nOrganismic(tanny)\nGasify(wilson, lavina) and Organismic(lavina) -> Take(lavina, tanny)\nforall x (Organismic(x) -> Take(x, lavina))\nforall x (Gasify(x, lavina) and Gasify(x, tanny) -> Take(x, wilson))\nTake(hermon, lavina) and Libidinal(hermon) -> Gasify(lavina, hermon)\nforall x (Take(x, wilson) and Organismic(x) -> Take(wilson, lavina))\nforall x (Mellow(x) -> Organismic(x))\nforall x (Gasify(x, wilson) -> Mellow(wilson))\nforall x (Gasify(x, tanny) and Gasify(x, wilson) -> Mellow(x))\n\nnot Organismic(wilson)\n\nGasify(hermon, wilson) and forall x (Gasify(x, wilson) -> Mellow(wilson)) -> therefore Mellow(wilson) Mellow(wilson) and forall x (Mellow(x) -> Organismic(x)) -> therefore Organismic(wilson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The roarke calk the sharla. The worthy fiddle the roarke. The millicent fiddle the worthy. The sharla is unfit. If the roarke fiddle the millicent and the millicent is unfit then the millicent draggle the sharla. If someone is unfit then they see the millicent. If someone fiddle the millicent and they eat the sharla then they see the roarke. If the worthy draggle the millicent and the worthy is bantoid then the millicent fiddle the worthy. If someone draggle the roarke and they are unfit then the roarke draggle the millicent. Blue people are unfit. If someone fiddle the roarke then the roarke is bullnecked. If someone fiddle the sharla and they eat the roarke then they are bullnecked. The roarke draggle the millicent.", "logic": "\nCalk(roarke, sharla)\nFiddle(worthy, roarke)\nFiddle(millicent, worthy)\nUnfit(sharla)\nFiddle(roarke, millicent) and Unfit(millicent) -> Draggle(millicent, sharla)\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Draggle(x, millicent))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, millicent) and Fiddle(x, sharla) -> Draggle(x, roarke))\nDraggle(worthy, millicent) and Bantoid(worthy) -> Fiddle(millicent, worthy)\nforall x (Draggle(x, roarke) and Unfit(x) -> Draggle(roarke, millicent))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Unfit(x))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, roarke) -> Bullnecked(roarke))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, sharla) and Fiddle(x, roarke) -> Bullnecked(x))\n\nDraggle(roarke, millicent)\n\nFiddle(worthy, roarke) and forall x (Fiddle(x, roarke) -> Bullnecked(roarke)) -> therefore Bullnecked(roarke) Bullnecked(roarke) and forall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Unfit(x)) -> therefore Unfit(roarke) Unfit(roarke) and forall x (Unfit(x) -> Draggle(x, millicent)) -> therefore Draggle(roarke, millicent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The edita hire the euclid. The florance claver the edita. The yves claver the florance. The euclid is winded. If the edita claver the yves and the yves is winded then the yves fistfight the euclid. If someone is winded then they see the yves. If someone claver the yves and they eat the euclid then they see the edita. If the florance fistfight the yves and the florance is loamless then the yves claver the florance. If someone fistfight the edita and they are winded then the edita fistfight the yves. Blue people are winded. If someone claver the edita then the edita is handheld. If someone claver the euclid and they eat the edita then they are handheld. The edita does not see the yves.", "logic": "\nHire(edita, euclid)\nClaver(florance, edita)\nClaver(yves, florance)\nWinded(euclid)\nClaver(edita, yves) and Winded(yves) -> Fistfight(yves, euclid)\nforall x (Winded(x) -> Fistfight(x, yves))\nforall x (Claver(x, yves) and Claver(x, euclid) -> Fistfight(x, edita))\nFistfight(florance, yves) and Loamless(florance) -> Claver(yves, florance)\nforall x (Fistfight(x, edita) and Winded(x) -> Fistfight(edita, yves))\nforall x (Handheld(x) -> Winded(x))\nforall x (Claver(x, edita) -> Handheld(edita))\nforall x (Claver(x, euclid) and Claver(x, edita) -> Handheld(x))\n\nnot Fistfight(edita, yves)\n\nClaver(florance, edita) and forall x (Claver(x, edita) -> Handheld(edita)) -> therefore Handheld(edita) Handheld(edita) and forall x (Handheld(x) -> Winded(x)) -> therefore Winded(edita) Winded(edita) and forall x (Winded(x) -> Fistfight(x, yves)) -> therefore Fistfight(edita, yves)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The josy alcoholize the shirlee. The tybie bitter the josy. The rachele bitter the tybie. The shirlee is nazarene. If the josy bitter the rachele and the rachele is nazarene then the rachele debunk the shirlee. If someone is nazarene then they see the rachele. If someone bitter the rachele and they eat the shirlee then they see the josy. If the tybie debunk the rachele and the tybie is wrathful then the rachele bitter the tybie. If someone debunk the josy and they are nazarene then the josy debunk the rachele. Blue people are nazarene. If someone bitter the josy then the josy is chaffy. If someone bitter the shirlee and they eat the josy then they are chaffy. The tybie is not chaffy.", "logic": "\nAlcoholize(josy, shirlee)\nBitter(tybie, josy)\nBitter(rachele, tybie)\nNazarene(shirlee)\nBitter(josy, rachele) and Nazarene(rachele) -> Debunk(rachele, shirlee)\nforall x (Nazarene(x) -> Debunk(x, rachele))\nforall x (Bitter(x, rachele) and Bitter(x, shirlee) -> Debunk(x, josy))\nDebunk(tybie, rachele) and Wrathful(tybie) -> Bitter(rachele, tybie)\nforall x (Debunk(x, josy) and Nazarene(x) -> Debunk(josy, rachele))\nforall x (Chaffy(x) -> Nazarene(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x, josy) -> Chaffy(josy))\nforall x (Bitter(x, shirlee) and Bitter(x, josy) -> Chaffy(x))\n\nnot Chaffy(tybie)\n\nforall x (Bitter(x, shirlee) and Bitter(x, josy) -> Chaffy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The kacy tink the taddeus. The elle knell the kacy. The mallissa knell the elle. The taddeus is reprobate. If the kacy knell the mallissa and the mallissa is reprobate then the mallissa lurch the taddeus. If someone is reprobate then they see the mallissa. If someone knell the mallissa and they eat the taddeus then they see the kacy. If the elle lurch the mallissa and the elle is gandhian then the mallissa knell the elle. If someone lurch the kacy and they are reprobate then the kacy lurch the mallissa. Blue people are reprobate. If someone knell the kacy then the kacy is unstinted. If someone knell the taddeus and they eat the kacy then they are unstinted. The mallissa lurch the kacy.", "logic": "\nTink(kacy, taddeus)\nKnell(elle, kacy)\nKnell(mallissa, elle)\nReprobate(taddeus)\nKnell(kacy, mallissa) and Reprobate(mallissa) -> Lurch(mallissa, taddeus)\nforall x (Reprobate(x) -> Lurch(x, mallissa))\nforall x (Knell(x, mallissa) and Knell(x, taddeus) -> Lurch(x, kacy))\nLurch(elle, mallissa) and Gandhian(elle) -> Knell(mallissa, elle)\nforall x (Lurch(x, kacy) and Reprobate(x) -> Lurch(kacy, mallissa))\nforall x (Unstinted(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Knell(x, kacy) -> Unstinted(kacy))\nforall x (Knell(x, taddeus) and Knell(x, kacy) -> Unstinted(x))\n\nLurch(mallissa, kacy)\n\nforall x (Knell(x, mallissa) and Knell(x, taddeus) -> Lurch(x, kacy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The dalton teach the erny. The dimitri ignore the dalton. The rosalyn ignore the dimitri. The erny is semisoft. If the dalton ignore the rosalyn and the rosalyn is semisoft then the rosalyn become the erny. If someone is semisoft then they see the rosalyn. If someone ignore the rosalyn and they eat the erny then they see the dalton. If the dimitri become the rosalyn and the dimitri is fibreoptic then the rosalyn ignore the dimitri. If someone become the dalton and they are semisoft then the dalton become the rosalyn. Blue people are semisoft. If someone ignore the dalton then the dalton is squabby. If someone ignore the erny and they eat the dalton then they are squabby. The erny does not see the dalton.", "logic": "\nTeach(dalton, erny)\nIgnore(dimitri, dalton)\nIgnore(rosalyn, dimitri)\nSemisoft(erny)\nIgnore(dalton, rosalyn) and Semisoft(rosalyn) -> Become(rosalyn, erny)\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Become(x, rosalyn))\nforall x (Ignore(x, rosalyn) and Ignore(x, erny) -> Become(x, dalton))\nBecome(dimitri, rosalyn) and Fibreoptic(dimitri) -> Ignore(rosalyn, dimitri)\nforall x (Become(x, dalton) and Semisoft(x) -> Become(dalton, rosalyn))\nforall x (Squabby(x) -> Semisoft(x))\nforall x (Ignore(x, dalton) -> Squabby(dalton))\nforall x (Ignore(x, erny) and Ignore(x, dalton) -> Squabby(x))\n\nnot Become(erny, dalton)\n\nforall x (Ignore(x, rosalyn) and Ignore(x, erny) -> Become(x, dalton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The odessa toll the malorie. The sibella italicize the odessa. The berkeley italicize the sibella. The malorie is vocational. If the odessa italicize the berkeley and the berkeley is vocational then the berkeley humiliate the malorie. If someone is vocational then they see the berkeley. If someone italicize the berkeley and they eat the malorie then they see the odessa. If the sibella humiliate the berkeley and the sibella is swedish then the berkeley italicize the sibella. If someone humiliate the odessa and they are vocational then the odessa humiliate the berkeley. Blue people are vocational. If someone italicize the odessa then the odessa is middling. If someone italicize the malorie and they eat the odessa then they are middling. The berkeley is vocational.", "logic": "\nToll(odessa, malorie)\nItalicize(sibella, odessa)\nItalicize(berkeley, sibella)\nVocational(malorie)\nItalicize(odessa, berkeley) and Vocational(berkeley) -> Humiliate(berkeley, malorie)\nforall x (Vocational(x) -> Humiliate(x, berkeley))\nforall x (Italicize(x, berkeley) and Italicize(x, malorie) -> Humiliate(x, odessa))\nHumiliate(sibella, berkeley) and Swedish(sibella) -> Italicize(berkeley, sibella)\nforall x (Humiliate(x, odessa) and Vocational(x) -> Humiliate(odessa, berkeley))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Vocational(x))\nforall x (Italicize(x, odessa) -> Middling(odessa))\nforall x (Italicize(x, malorie) and Italicize(x, odessa) -> Middling(x))\n\nVocational(berkeley)\n\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Vocational(x)) <- forall x (Italicize(x, malorie) and Italicize(x, odessa) -> Middling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The hillary unfurl the melonie. The robby perfect the hillary. The casia perfect the robby. The melonie is supposed. If the hillary perfect the casia and the casia is supposed then the casia unplug the melonie. If someone is supposed then they see the casia. If someone perfect the casia and they eat the melonie then they see the hillary. If the robby unplug the casia and the robby is asymmetric then the casia perfect the robby. If someone unplug the hillary and they are supposed then the hillary unplug the casia. Blue people are supposed. If someone perfect the hillary then the hillary is anatomic. If someone perfect the melonie and they eat the hillary then they are anatomic. The robby is not nice.", "logic": "\nUnfurl(hillary, melonie)\nPerfect(robby, hillary)\nPerfect(casia, robby)\nSupposed(melonie)\nPerfect(hillary, casia) and Supposed(casia) -> Unplug(casia, melonie)\nforall x (Supposed(x) -> Unplug(x, casia))\nforall x (Perfect(x, casia) and Perfect(x, melonie) -> Unplug(x, hillary))\nUnplug(robby, casia) and Asymmetric(robby) -> Perfect(casia, robby)\nforall x (Unplug(x, hillary) and Supposed(x) -> Unplug(hillary, casia))\nforall x (Anatomic(x) -> Supposed(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x, hillary) -> Anatomic(hillary))\nforall x (Perfect(x, melonie) and Perfect(x, hillary) -> Anatomic(x))\n\nnot Nice(robby)\n\nnot Nice(robby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The joaquin tower the saudra. The dedie taunt the joaquin. The sherie taunt the dedie. The saudra is unexpected. If the joaquin taunt the sherie and the sherie is unexpected then the sherie reconvict the saudra. If someone is unexpected then they see the sherie. If someone taunt the sherie and they eat the saudra then they see the joaquin. If the dedie reconvict the sherie and the dedie is thornless then the sherie taunt the dedie. If someone reconvict the joaquin and they are unexpected then the joaquin reconvict the sherie. Blue people are unexpected. If someone taunt the joaquin then the joaquin is backstair. If someone taunt the saudra and they eat the joaquin then they are backstair. The dedie reconvict the saudra.", "logic": "\nTower(joaquin, saudra)\nTaunt(dedie, joaquin)\nTaunt(sherie, dedie)\nUnexpected(saudra)\nTaunt(joaquin, sherie) and Unexpected(sherie) -> Reconvict(sherie, saudra)\nforall x (Unexpected(x) -> Reconvict(x, sherie))\nforall x (Taunt(x, sherie) and Taunt(x, saudra) -> Reconvict(x, joaquin))\nReconvict(dedie, sherie) and Thornless(dedie) -> Taunt(sherie, dedie)\nforall x (Reconvict(x, joaquin) and Unexpected(x) -> Reconvict(joaquin, sherie))\nforall x (Backstair(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Taunt(x, joaquin) -> Backstair(joaquin))\nforall x (Taunt(x, saudra) and Taunt(x, joaquin) -> Backstair(x))\n\nReconvict(dedie, saudra)\n\nReconvict(dedie, saudra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The berkie gulp the valery. The thadeus oversee the berkie. The vania oversee the thadeus. The valery is axenic. If the berkie oversee the vania and the vania is axenic then the vania dramatize the valery. If someone is axenic then they see the vania. If someone oversee the vania and they eat the valery then they see the berkie. If the thadeus dramatize the vania and the thadeus is unmovable then the vania oversee the thadeus. If someone dramatize the berkie and they are axenic then the berkie dramatize the vania. Blue people are axenic. If someone oversee the berkie then the berkie is satirical. If someone oversee the valery and they eat the berkie then they are satirical. The valery is not green.", "logic": "\nGulp(berkie, valery)\nOversee(thadeus, berkie)\nOversee(vania, thadeus)\nAxenic(valery)\nOversee(berkie, vania) and Axenic(vania) -> Dramatize(vania, valery)\nforall x (Axenic(x) -> Dramatize(x, vania))\nforall x (Oversee(x, vania) and Oversee(x, valery) -> Dramatize(x, berkie))\nDramatize(thadeus, vania) and Unmovable(thadeus) -> Oversee(vania, thadeus)\nforall x (Dramatize(x, berkie) and Axenic(x) -> Dramatize(berkie, vania))\nforall x (Satirical(x) -> Axenic(x))\nforall x (Oversee(x, berkie) -> Satirical(berkie))\nforall x (Oversee(x, valery) and Oversee(x, berkie) -> Satirical(x))\n\nnot Green(valery)\n\nnot Green(valery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The gustav index the roxanna. The gui center the gustav. The stevy center the gui. The roxanna is thirtieth. If the gustav center the stevy and the stevy is thirtieth then the stevy articulate the roxanna. If someone is thirtieth then they see the stevy. If someone center the stevy and they eat the roxanna then they see the gustav. If the gui articulate the stevy and the gui is scattered then the stevy center the gui. If someone articulate the gustav and they are thirtieth then the gustav articulate the stevy. Blue people are thirtieth. If someone center the gustav then the gustav is wound. If someone center the roxanna and they eat the gustav then they are wound. The gustav is green.", "logic": "\nIndex(gustav, roxanna)\nCenter(gui, gustav)\nCenter(stevy, gui)\nThirtieth(roxanna)\nCenter(gustav, stevy) and Thirtieth(stevy) -> Articulate(stevy, roxanna)\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Articulate(x, stevy))\nforall x (Center(x, stevy) and Center(x, roxanna) -> Articulate(x, gustav))\nArticulate(gui, stevy) and Scattered(gui) -> Center(stevy, gui)\nforall x (Articulate(x, gustav) and Thirtieth(x) -> Articulate(gustav, stevy))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Thirtieth(x))\nforall x (Center(x, gustav) -> Wound(gustav))\nforall x (Center(x, roxanna) and Center(x, gustav) -> Wound(x))\n\nGreen(gustav)\n\nGreen(gustav) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The adolfo is nonuple. The austina is penile. The weslie does not eat the austina. If the weslie is not diarrhoeal and the weslie does not eat the austina then the austina does not like the weslie. If something is nonuple then it lounge the austina. If something is nonuple then it lever the weslie. If something lounge the austina then it is penile. If something burrow the austina and the austina burrow the adolfo then the austina is not diarrhoeal. If something is penile then it lever the adolfo. If something lounge the adolfo then the adolfo does not eat the weslie. If something lounge the adolfo and it does not see the adolfo then the adolfo is diarrhoeal. The weslie does not eat the austina.", "logic": "\nNonuple(adolfo)\nPenile(austina)\nnot Burrow(weslie, austina)\nnot Diarrhoeal(weslie) and not Burrow(weslie, austina) -> not Lounge(austina, weslie)\nforall x (Nonuple(x) -> Lounge(x, austina))\nforall x (Nonuple(x) -> Lever(x, weslie))\nforall x (Lounge(x, austina) -> Penile(x))\nforall x (Burrow(x, austina) and Burrow(austina, adolfo) -> not Diarrhoeal(austina))\nforall x (Penile(x) -> Lever(x, adolfo))\nforall x (Lounge(x, adolfo) -> not Burrow(adolfo, weslie))\nforall x (Lounge(x, adolfo) and not Lever(x, adolfo) -> Diarrhoeal(adolfo))\n\nnot Burrow(weslie, austina)\n\ntherefore not Burrow(weslie, austina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The dayle is anapestic. The shannah is jolty. The milton does not eat the shannah. If the milton is not bilinear and the milton does not eat the shannah then the shannah does not like the milton. If something is anapestic then it shuttle the shannah. If something is anapestic then it dynamise the milton. If something shuttle the shannah then it is jolty. If something encipher the shannah and the shannah encipher the dayle then the shannah is not bilinear. If something is jolty then it dynamise the dayle. If something shuttle the dayle then the dayle does not eat the milton. If something shuttle the dayle and it does not see the dayle then the dayle is bilinear. The shannah is not jolty.", "logic": "\nAnapestic(dayle)\nJolty(shannah)\nnot Encipher(milton, shannah)\nnot Bilinear(milton) and not Encipher(milton, shannah) -> not Shuttle(shannah, milton)\nforall x (Anapestic(x) -> Shuttle(x, shannah))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) -> Dynamise(x, milton))\nforall x (Shuttle(x, shannah) -> Jolty(x))\nforall x (Encipher(x, shannah) and Encipher(shannah, dayle) -> not Bilinear(shannah))\nforall x (Jolty(x) -> Dynamise(x, dayle))\nforall x (Shuttle(x, dayle) -> not Encipher(dayle, milton))\nforall x (Shuttle(x, dayle) and not Dynamise(x, dayle) -> Bilinear(dayle))\n\nnot Jolty(shannah)\n\ntherefore Jolty(shannah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The jenna is gilded. The jenilee is amidship. The betti does not eat the jenilee. If the betti is not duodecimal and the betti does not eat the jenilee then the jenilee does not like the betti. If something is gilded then it bitch the jenilee. If something is gilded then it predigest the betti. If something bitch the jenilee then it is amidship. If something predecease the jenilee and the jenilee predecease the jenna then the jenilee is not duodecimal. If something is amidship then it predigest the jenna. If something bitch the jenna then the jenna does not eat the betti. If something bitch the jenna and it does not see the jenna then the jenna is duodecimal. The jenna predigest the betti.", "logic": "\nGilded(jenna)\nAmidship(jenilee)\nnot Predecease(betti, jenilee)\nnot Duodecimal(betti) and not Predecease(betti, jenilee) -> not Bitch(jenilee, betti)\nforall x (Gilded(x) -> Bitch(x, jenilee))\nforall x (Gilded(x) -> Predigest(x, betti))\nforall x (Bitch(x, jenilee) -> Amidship(x))\nforall x (Predecease(x, jenilee) and Predecease(jenilee, jenna) -> not Duodecimal(jenilee))\nforall x (Amidship(x) -> Predigest(x, jenna))\nforall x (Bitch(x, jenna) -> not Predecease(jenna, betti))\nforall x (Bitch(x, jenna) and not Predigest(x, jenna) -> Duodecimal(jenna))\n\nPredigest(jenna, betti)\n\nGilded(jenna) and forall x (Gilded(x) -> Predigest(x, betti)) -> therefore Predigest(jenna, betti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The abraham is lustrous. The bettine is subhuman. The nikos does not eat the bettine. If the nikos is not bodily and the nikos does not eat the bettine then the bettine does not like the nikos. If something is lustrous then it fleet the bettine. If something is lustrous then it barrel the nikos. If something fleet the bettine then it is subhuman. If something fork the bettine and the bettine fork the abraham then the bettine is not bodily. If something is subhuman then it barrel the abraham. If something fleet the abraham then the abraham does not eat the nikos. If something fleet the abraham and it does not see the abraham then the abraham is bodily. The abraham does not like the bettine.", "logic": "\nLustrous(abraham)\nSubhuman(bettine)\nnot Fork(nikos, bettine)\nnot Bodily(nikos) and not Fork(nikos, bettine) -> not Fleet(bettine, nikos)\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Fleet(x, bettine))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Barrel(x, nikos))\nforall x (Fleet(x, bettine) -> Subhuman(x))\nforall x (Fork(x, bettine) and Fork(bettine, abraham) -> not Bodily(bettine))\nforall x (Subhuman(x) -> Barrel(x, abraham))\nforall x (Fleet(x, abraham) -> not Fork(abraham, nikos))\nforall x (Fleet(x, abraham) and not Barrel(x, abraham) -> Bodily(abraham))\n\nnot Fleet(abraham, bettine)\n\nLustrous(abraham) and forall x (Lustrous(x) -> Fleet(x, bettine)) -> therefore Fleet(abraham, bettine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The cortney is arteriolar. The koral is subject. The jackson does not eat the koral. If the jackson is not drooping and the jackson does not eat the koral then the koral does not like the jackson. If something is arteriolar then it crisscross the koral. If something is arteriolar then it poetize the jackson. If something crisscross the koral then it is subject. If something entangle the koral and the koral entangle the cortney then the koral is not drooping. If something is subject then it poetize the cortney. If something crisscross the cortney then the cortney does not eat the jackson. If something crisscross the cortney and it does not see the cortney then the cortney is drooping. The cortney is subject.", "logic": "\nArteriolar(cortney)\nSubject(koral)\nnot Entangle(jackson, koral)\nnot Drooping(jackson) and not Entangle(jackson, koral) -> not Crisscross(koral, jackson)\nforall x (Arteriolar(x) -> Crisscross(x, koral))\nforall x (Arteriolar(x) -> Poetize(x, jackson))\nforall x (Crisscross(x, koral) -> Subject(x))\nforall x (Entangle(x, koral) and Entangle(koral, cortney) -> not Drooping(koral))\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Poetize(x, cortney))\nforall x (Crisscross(x, cortney) -> not Entangle(cortney, jackson))\nforall x (Crisscross(x, cortney) and not Poetize(x, cortney) -> Drooping(cortney))\n\nSubject(cortney)\n\nArteriolar(cortney) and forall x (Arteriolar(x) -> Crisscross(x, koral)) -> therefore Crisscross(cortney, koral) Crisscross(cortney, koral) and forall x (Crisscross(x, koral) -> Subject(x)) -> therefore Subject(cortney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The evonne is elliptic. The pam is complete. The trace does not eat the pam. If the trace is not behavioral and the trace does not eat the pam then the pam does not like the trace. If something is elliptic then it give the pam. If something is elliptic then it goffer the trace. If something give the pam then it is complete. If something blindfold the pam and the pam blindfold the evonne then the pam is not behavioral. If something is complete then it goffer the evonne. If something give the evonne then the evonne does not eat the trace. If something give the evonne and it does not see the evonne then the evonne is behavioral. The evonne is not complete.", "logic": "\nElliptic(evonne)\nComplete(pam)\nnot Blindfold(trace, pam)\nnot Behavioral(trace) and not Blindfold(trace, pam) -> not Give(pam, trace)\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Give(x, pam))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Goffer(x, trace))\nforall x (Give(x, pam) -> Complete(x))\nforall x (Blindfold(x, pam) and Blindfold(pam, evonne) -> not Behavioral(pam))\nforall x (Complete(x) -> Goffer(x, evonne))\nforall x (Give(x, evonne) -> not Blindfold(evonne, trace))\nforall x (Give(x, evonne) and not Goffer(x, evonne) -> Behavioral(evonne))\n\nnot Complete(evonne)\n\nElliptic(evonne) and forall x (Elliptic(x) -> Give(x, pam)) -> therefore Give(evonne, pam) Give(evonne, pam) and forall x (Give(x, pam) -> Complete(x)) -> therefore Complete(evonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The donny is irenic. The niles is frail. The dierdre does not eat the niles. If the dierdre is not fruitful and the dierdre does not eat the niles then the niles does not like the dierdre. If something is irenic then it demystify the niles. If something is irenic then it hibachi the dierdre. If something demystify the niles then it is frail. If something propel the niles and the niles propel the donny then the niles is not fruitful. If something is frail then it hibachi the donny. If something demystify the donny then the donny does not eat the dierdre. If something demystify the donny and it does not see the donny then the donny is fruitful. The donny hibachi the donny.", "logic": "\nIrenic(donny)\nFrail(niles)\nnot Propel(dierdre, niles)\nnot Fruitful(dierdre) and not Propel(dierdre, niles) -> not Demystify(niles, dierdre)\nforall x (Irenic(x) -> Demystify(x, niles))\nforall x (Irenic(x) -> Hibachi(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Demystify(x, niles) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Propel(x, niles) and Propel(niles, donny) -> not Fruitful(niles))\nforall x (Frail(x) -> Hibachi(x, donny))\nforall x (Demystify(x, donny) -> not Propel(donny, dierdre))\nforall x (Demystify(x, donny) and not Hibachi(x, donny) -> Fruitful(donny))\n\nHibachi(donny, donny)\n\nIrenic(donny) and forall x (Irenic(x) -> Demystify(x, niles)) -> therefore Demystify(donny, niles) Demystify(donny, niles) and forall x (Demystify(x, niles) -> Frail(x)) -> therefore Frail(donny) Frail(donny) and forall x (Frail(x) -> Hibachi(x, donny)) -> therefore Hibachi(donny, donny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The vivyanne is ebionite. The hadleigh is vesicular. The hammad does not eat the hadleigh. If the hammad is not spoiled and the hammad does not eat the hadleigh then the hadleigh does not like the hammad. If something is ebionite then it spud the hadleigh. If something is ebionite then it beseech the hammad. If something spud the hadleigh then it is vesicular. If something corbel the hadleigh and the hadleigh corbel the vivyanne then the hadleigh is not spoiled. If something is vesicular then it beseech the vivyanne. If something spud the vivyanne then the vivyanne does not eat the hammad. If something spud the vivyanne and it does not see the vivyanne then the vivyanne is spoiled. The vivyanne does not see the vivyanne.", "logic": "\nEbionite(vivyanne)\nVesicular(hadleigh)\nnot Corbel(hammad, hadleigh)\nnot Spoiled(hammad) and not Corbel(hammad, hadleigh) -> not Spud(hadleigh, hammad)\nforall x (Ebionite(x) -> Spud(x, hadleigh))\nforall x (Ebionite(x) -> Beseech(x, hammad))\nforall x (Spud(x, hadleigh) -> Vesicular(x))\nforall x (Corbel(x, hadleigh) and Corbel(hadleigh, vivyanne) -> not Spoiled(hadleigh))\nforall x (Vesicular(x) -> Beseech(x, vivyanne))\nforall x (Spud(x, vivyanne) -> not Corbel(vivyanne, hammad))\nforall x (Spud(x, vivyanne) and not Beseech(x, vivyanne) -> Spoiled(vivyanne))\n\nnot Beseech(vivyanne, vivyanne)\n\nEbionite(vivyanne) and forall x (Ebionite(x) -> Spud(x, hadleigh)) -> therefore Spud(vivyanne, hadleigh) Spud(vivyanne, hadleigh) and forall x (Spud(x, hadleigh) -> Vesicular(x)) -> therefore Vesicular(vivyanne) Vesicular(vivyanne) and forall x (Vesicular(x) -> Beseech(x, vivyanne)) -> therefore Beseech(vivyanne, vivyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The salomone is plethoric. The zorine is mannish. The saul does not eat the zorine. If the saul is not ratty and the saul does not eat the zorine then the zorine does not like the saul. If something is plethoric then it seaplane the zorine. If something is plethoric then it disown the saul. If something seaplane the zorine then it is mannish. If something dodge the zorine and the zorine dodge the salomone then the zorine is not ratty. If something is mannish then it disown the salomone. If something seaplane the salomone then the salomone does not eat the saul. If something seaplane the salomone and it does not see the salomone then the salomone is ratty. The saul is not mannish.", "logic": "\nPlethoric(salomone)\nMannish(zorine)\nnot Dodge(saul, zorine)\nnot Ratty(saul) and not Dodge(saul, zorine) -> not Seaplane(zorine, saul)\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Seaplane(x, zorine))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Disown(x, saul))\nforall x (Seaplane(x, zorine) -> Mannish(x))\nforall x (Dodge(x, zorine) and Dodge(zorine, salomone) -> not Ratty(zorine))\nforall x (Mannish(x) -> Disown(x, salomone))\nforall x (Seaplane(x, salomone) -> not Dodge(salomone, saul))\nforall x (Seaplane(x, salomone) and not Disown(x, salomone) -> Ratty(salomone))\n\nnot Mannish(saul)\n\nforall x (Seaplane(x, zorine) -> Mannish(x)) <- forall x (Plethoric(x) -> Seaplane(x, zorine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The cissy is boughten. The greggory is offish. The shira does not eat the greggory. If the shira is not hated and the shira does not eat the greggory then the greggory does not like the shira. If something is boughten then it polychrome the greggory. If something is boughten then it convulse the shira. If something polychrome the greggory then it is offish. If something uniformize the greggory and the greggory uniformize the cissy then the greggory is not hated. If something is offish then it convulse the cissy. If something polychrome the cissy then the cissy does not eat the shira. If something polychrome the cissy and it does not see the cissy then the cissy is hated. The cissy is hated.", "logic": "\nBoughten(cissy)\nOffish(greggory)\nnot Uniformize(shira, greggory)\nnot Hated(shira) and not Uniformize(shira, greggory) -> not Polychrome(greggory, shira)\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Polychrome(x, greggory))\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Convulse(x, shira))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, greggory) -> Offish(x))\nforall x (Uniformize(x, greggory) and Uniformize(greggory, cissy) -> not Hated(greggory))\nforall x (Offish(x) -> Convulse(x, cissy))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, cissy) -> not Uniformize(cissy, shira))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, cissy) and not Convulse(x, cissy) -> Hated(cissy))\n\nHated(cissy)\n\nforall x (Polychrome(x, cissy) and not Convulse(x, cissy) -> Hated(cissy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The sharona is uniovular. The ciara is darkish. The susi does not eat the ciara. If the susi is not webbed and the susi does not eat the ciara then the ciara does not like the susi. If something is uniovular then it quieten the ciara. If something is uniovular then it shepherd the susi. If something quieten the ciara then it is darkish. If something recurve the ciara and the ciara recurve the sharona then the ciara is not webbed. If something is darkish then it shepherd the sharona. If something quieten the sharona then the sharona does not eat the susi. If something quieten the sharona and it does not see the sharona then the sharona is webbed. The ciara does not see the susi.", "logic": "\nUniovular(sharona)\nDarkish(ciara)\nnot Recurve(susi, ciara)\nnot Webbed(susi) and not Recurve(susi, ciara) -> not Quieten(ciara, susi)\nforall x (Uniovular(x) -> Quieten(x, ciara))\nforall x (Uniovular(x) -> Shepherd(x, susi))\nforall x (Quieten(x, ciara) -> Darkish(x))\nforall x (Recurve(x, ciara) and Recurve(ciara, sharona) -> not Webbed(ciara))\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> Shepherd(x, sharona))\nforall x (Quieten(x, sharona) -> not Recurve(sharona, susi))\nforall x (Quieten(x, sharona) and not Shepherd(x, sharona) -> Webbed(sharona))\n\nnot Shepherd(ciara, susi)\n\nforall x (Uniovular(x) -> Shepherd(x, susi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The linn is avellane. The talyah is vitalizing. The goddart does not eat the talyah. If the goddart is not amygdaloid and the goddart does not eat the talyah then the talyah does not like the goddart. If something is avellane then it slump the talyah. If something is avellane then it ghettoise the goddart. If something slump the talyah then it is vitalizing. If something popularise the talyah and the talyah popularise the linn then the talyah is not amygdaloid. If something is vitalizing then it ghettoise the linn. If something slump the linn then the linn does not eat the goddart. If something slump the linn and it does not see the linn then the linn is amygdaloid. The talyah slump the talyah.", "logic": "\nAvellane(linn)\nVitalizing(talyah)\nnot Popularise(goddart, talyah)\nnot Amygdaloid(goddart) and not Popularise(goddart, talyah) -> not Slump(talyah, goddart)\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Slump(x, talyah))\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Ghettoise(x, goddart))\nforall x (Slump(x, talyah) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Popularise(x, talyah) and Popularise(talyah, linn) -> not Amygdaloid(talyah))\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) -> Ghettoise(x, linn))\nforall x (Slump(x, linn) -> not Popularise(linn, goddart))\nforall x (Slump(x, linn) and not Ghettoise(x, linn) -> Amygdaloid(linn))\n\nSlump(talyah, talyah)\n\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Slump(x, talyah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The fortuna is bristly. The angie is moving. The berry does not eat the angie. If the berry is not wolflike and the berry does not eat the angie then the angie does not like the berry. If something is bristly then it offend the angie. If something is bristly then it endure the berry. If something offend the angie then it is moving. If something retry the angie and the angie retry the fortuna then the angie is not wolflike. If something is moving then it endure the fortuna. If something offend the fortuna then the fortuna does not eat the berry. If something offend the fortuna and it does not see the fortuna then the fortuna is wolflike. The fortuna does not eat the angie.", "logic": "\nBristly(fortuna)\nMoving(angie)\nnot Retry(berry, angie)\nnot Wolflike(berry) and not Retry(berry, angie) -> not Offend(angie, berry)\nforall x (Bristly(x) -> Offend(x, angie))\nforall x (Bristly(x) -> Endure(x, berry))\nforall x (Offend(x, angie) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Retry(x, angie) and Retry(angie, fortuna) -> not Wolflike(angie))\nforall x (Moving(x) -> Endure(x, fortuna))\nforall x (Offend(x, fortuna) -> not Retry(fortuna, berry))\nforall x (Offend(x, fortuna) and not Endure(x, fortuna) -> Wolflike(fortuna))\n\nnot Retry(fortuna, angie)\n\nnot Retry(fortuna, angie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The venkat is anesthetic. The rodina is barbecued. The jill does not eat the rodina. If the jill is not polyphase and the jill does not eat the rodina then the rodina does not like the jill. If something is anesthetic then it format the rodina. If something is anesthetic then it goose the jill. If something format the rodina then it is barbecued. If something outbrave the rodina and the rodina outbrave the venkat then the rodina is not polyphase. If something is barbecued then it goose the venkat. If something format the venkat then the venkat does not eat the jill. If something format the venkat and it does not see the venkat then the venkat is polyphase. The venkat format the jill.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(venkat)\nBarbecued(rodina)\nnot Outbrave(jill, rodina)\nnot Polyphase(jill) and not Outbrave(jill, rodina) -> not Format(rodina, jill)\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Format(x, rodina))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Goose(x, jill))\nforall x (Format(x, rodina) -> Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Outbrave(x, rodina) and Outbrave(rodina, venkat) -> not Polyphase(rodina))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) -> Goose(x, venkat))\nforall x (Format(x, venkat) -> not Outbrave(venkat, jill))\nforall x (Format(x, venkat) and not Goose(x, venkat) -> Polyphase(venkat))\n\nFormat(venkat, jill)\n\nFormat(venkat, jill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The josh is heraldist. The rufus is deserved. The meredith does not eat the rufus. If the meredith is not gratis and the meredith does not eat the rufus then the rufus does not like the meredith. If something is heraldist then it brainstorm the rufus. If something is heraldist then it flit the meredith. If something brainstorm the rufus then it is deserved. If something quake the rufus and the rufus quake the josh then the rufus is not gratis. If something is deserved then it flit the josh. If something brainstorm the josh then the josh does not eat the meredith. If something brainstorm the josh and it does not see the josh then the josh is gratis. The meredith is not blue.", "logic": "\nHeraldist(josh)\nDeserved(rufus)\nnot Quake(meredith, rufus)\nnot Gratis(meredith) and not Quake(meredith, rufus) -> not Brainstorm(rufus, meredith)\nforall x (Heraldist(x) -> Brainstorm(x, rufus))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) -> Flit(x, meredith))\nforall x (Brainstorm(x, rufus) -> Deserved(x))\nforall x (Quake(x, rufus) and Quake(rufus, josh) -> not Gratis(rufus))\nforall x (Deserved(x) -> Flit(x, josh))\nforall x (Brainstorm(x, josh) -> not Quake(josh, meredith))\nforall x (Brainstorm(x, josh) and not Flit(x, josh) -> Gratis(josh))\n\nnot Blue(meredith)\n\nnot Blue(meredith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The lazare is inaccurate. The charis is medieval. The minny does not eat the charis. If the minny is not bellying and the minny does not eat the charis then the charis does not like the minny. If something is inaccurate then it repatriate the charis. If something is inaccurate then it evince the minny. If something repatriate the charis then it is medieval. If something pumice the charis and the charis pumice the lazare then the charis is not bellying. If something is medieval then it evince the lazare. If something repatriate the lazare then the lazare does not eat the minny. If something repatriate the lazare and it does not see the lazare then the lazare is bellying. The minny is round.", "logic": "\nInaccurate(lazare)\nMedieval(charis)\nnot Pumice(minny, charis)\nnot Bellying(minny) and not Pumice(minny, charis) -> not Repatriate(charis, minny)\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) -> Repatriate(x, charis))\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) -> Evince(x, minny))\nforall x (Repatriate(x, charis) -> Medieval(x))\nforall x (Pumice(x, charis) and Pumice(charis, lazare) -> not Bellying(charis))\nforall x (Medieval(x) -> Evince(x, lazare))\nforall x (Repatriate(x, lazare) -> not Pumice(lazare, minny))\nforall x (Repatriate(x, lazare) and not Evince(x, lazare) -> Bellying(lazare))\n\nRound(minny)\n\nRound(minny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The juliette soap the daveen. The juliette is unshoed. The juliette is projected. The daveen soap the lou. The daveen is pagan. The daveen downsize the juliette. The jackelyn soap the juliette. The jackelyn is unshoed. The jackelyn is fatal. The jackelyn birdie the juliette. The jackelyn birdie the lou. The jackelyn downsize the juliette. The lou is wrinkled. The lou is pagan. The lou birdie the juliette. The lou downsize the jackelyn. If the juliette is wrinkled then the juliette downsize the jackelyn. If someone birdie the jackelyn then they are projected. If someone is projected then they visit the lou. If someone soap the lou then they like the jackelyn. If someone birdie the lou then they chase the jackelyn. If someone is fatal and they like the juliette then the juliette birdie the lou. The daveen soap the lou.", "logic": "\nSoap(juliette, daveen)\nUnshoed(juliette)\nProjected(juliette)\nSoap(daveen, lou)\nPagan(daveen)\nDownsize(daveen, juliette)\nSoap(jackelyn, juliette)\nUnshoed(jackelyn)\nFatal(jackelyn)\nBirdie(jackelyn, juliette)\nBirdie(jackelyn, lou)\nDownsize(jackelyn, juliette)\nWrinkled(lou)\nPagan(lou)\nBirdie(lou, juliette)\nDownsize(lou, jackelyn)\nWrinkled(juliette) -> Downsize(juliette, jackelyn)\nforall x (Birdie(x, jackelyn) -> Projected(x))\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Downsize(x, lou))\nforall x (Soap(x, lou) -> Birdie(x, jackelyn))\nforall x (Birdie(x, lou) -> Soap(x, jackelyn))\nforall x (Fatal(x) and Birdie(x, juliette) -> Birdie(juliette, lou))\n\nSoap(daveen, lou)\n\ntherefore Soap(daveen, lou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The jade corral the beatriz. The jade is netted. The jade is cruddy. The beatriz corral the bell. The beatriz is misused. The beatriz bivouac the jade. The alison corral the jade. The alison is netted. The alison is sleek. The alison condition the jade. The alison condition the bell. The alison bivouac the jade. The bell is ablaze. The bell is misused. The bell condition the jade. The bell bivouac the alison. If the jade is ablaze then the jade bivouac the alison. If someone condition the alison then they are cruddy. If someone is cruddy then they visit the bell. If someone corral the bell then they like the alison. If someone condition the bell then they chase the alison. If someone is sleek and they like the jade then the jade condition the bell. The alison is not netted.", "logic": "\nCorral(jade, beatriz)\nNetted(jade)\nCruddy(jade)\nCorral(beatriz, bell)\nMisused(beatriz)\nBivouac(beatriz, jade)\nCorral(alison, jade)\nNetted(alison)\nSleek(alison)\nCondition(alison, jade)\nCondition(alison, bell)\nBivouac(alison, jade)\nAblaze(bell)\nMisused(bell)\nCondition(bell, jade)\nBivouac(bell, alison)\nAblaze(jade) -> Bivouac(jade, alison)\nforall x (Condition(x, alison) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Cruddy(x) -> Bivouac(x, bell))\nforall x (Corral(x, bell) -> Condition(x, alison))\nforall x (Condition(x, bell) -> Corral(x, alison))\nforall x (Sleek(x) and Condition(x, jade) -> Condition(jade, bell))\n\nnot Netted(alison)\n\ntherefore Netted(alison)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The tonya treble the evangelin. The tonya is undersea. The tonya is squab. The evangelin treble the rozalin. The evangelin is saintlike. The evangelin mature the tonya. The waldon treble the tonya. The waldon is undersea. The waldon is ceruminous. The waldon snarl the tonya. The waldon snarl the rozalin. The waldon mature the tonya. The rozalin is inertial. The rozalin is saintlike. The rozalin snarl the tonya. The rozalin mature the waldon. If the tonya is inertial then the tonya mature the waldon. If someone snarl the waldon then they are squab. If someone is squab then they visit the rozalin. If someone treble the rozalin then they like the waldon. If someone snarl the rozalin then they chase the waldon. If someone is ceruminous and they like the tonya then the tonya snarl the rozalin. The waldon treble the waldon.", "logic": "\nTreble(tonya, evangelin)\nUndersea(tonya)\nSquab(tonya)\nTreble(evangelin, rozalin)\nSaintlike(evangelin)\nMature(evangelin, tonya)\nTreble(waldon, tonya)\nUndersea(waldon)\nCeruminous(waldon)\nSnarl(waldon, tonya)\nSnarl(waldon, rozalin)\nMature(waldon, tonya)\nInertial(rozalin)\nSaintlike(rozalin)\nSnarl(rozalin, tonya)\nMature(rozalin, waldon)\nInertial(tonya) -> Mature(tonya, waldon)\nforall x (Snarl(x, waldon) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> Mature(x, rozalin))\nforall x (Treble(x, rozalin) -> Snarl(x, waldon))\nforall x (Snarl(x, rozalin) -> Treble(x, waldon))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) and Snarl(x, tonya) -> Snarl(tonya, rozalin))\n\nTreble(waldon, waldon)\n\nSnarl(waldon, rozalin) and forall x (Snarl(x, rozalin) -> Treble(x, waldon)) -> therefore Treble(waldon, waldon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The sandra reinstate the zsazsa. The sandra is fruticose. The sandra is cerise. The zsazsa reinstate the meredith. The zsazsa is invading. The zsazsa placard the sandra. The mendie reinstate the sandra. The mendie is fruticose. The mendie is awestruck. The mendie untie the sandra. The mendie untie the meredith. The mendie placard the sandra. The meredith is dyslexic. The meredith is invading. The meredith untie the sandra. The meredith placard the mendie. If the sandra is dyslexic then the sandra placard the mendie. If someone untie the mendie then they are cerise. If someone is cerise then they visit the meredith. If someone reinstate the meredith then they like the mendie. If someone untie the meredith then they chase the mendie. If someone is awestruck and they like the sandra then the sandra untie the meredith. The sandra does not visit the meredith.", "logic": "\nReinstate(sandra, zsazsa)\nFruticose(sandra)\nCerise(sandra)\nReinstate(zsazsa, meredith)\nInvading(zsazsa)\nPlacard(zsazsa, sandra)\nReinstate(mendie, sandra)\nFruticose(mendie)\nAwestruck(mendie)\nUntie(mendie, sandra)\nUntie(mendie, meredith)\nPlacard(mendie, sandra)\nDyslexic(meredith)\nInvading(meredith)\nUntie(meredith, sandra)\nPlacard(meredith, mendie)\nDyslexic(sandra) -> Placard(sandra, mendie)\nforall x (Untie(x, mendie) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Cerise(x) -> Placard(x, meredith))\nforall x (Reinstate(x, meredith) -> Untie(x, mendie))\nforall x (Untie(x, meredith) -> Reinstate(x, mendie))\nforall x (Awestruck(x) and Untie(x, sandra) -> Untie(sandra, meredith))\n\nnot Placard(sandra, meredith)\n\nCerise(sandra) and forall x (Cerise(x) -> Placard(x, meredith)) -> therefore Placard(sandra, meredith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The amelita broker the hetti. The amelita is membranous. The amelita is agrestic. The hetti broker the henrietta. The hetti is roast. The hetti deplane the amelita. The torrie broker the amelita. The torrie is membranous. The torrie is unwritten. The torrie goldplate the amelita. The torrie goldplate the henrietta. The torrie deplane the amelita. The henrietta is privileged. The henrietta is roast. The henrietta goldplate the amelita. The henrietta deplane the torrie. If the amelita is privileged then the amelita deplane the torrie. If someone goldplate the torrie then they are agrestic. If someone is agrestic then they visit the henrietta. If someone broker the henrietta then they like the torrie. If someone goldplate the henrietta then they chase the torrie. If someone is unwritten and they like the amelita then the amelita goldplate the henrietta. The hetti is agrestic.", "logic": "\nBroker(amelita, hetti)\nMembranous(amelita)\nAgrestic(amelita)\nBroker(hetti, henrietta)\nRoast(hetti)\nDeplane(hetti, amelita)\nBroker(torrie, amelita)\nMembranous(torrie)\nUnwritten(torrie)\nGoldplate(torrie, amelita)\nGoldplate(torrie, henrietta)\nDeplane(torrie, amelita)\nPrivileged(henrietta)\nRoast(henrietta)\nGoldplate(henrietta, amelita)\nDeplane(henrietta, torrie)\nPrivileged(amelita) -> Deplane(amelita, torrie)\nforall x (Goldplate(x, torrie) -> Agrestic(x))\nforall x (Agrestic(x) -> Deplane(x, henrietta))\nforall x (Broker(x, henrietta) -> Goldplate(x, torrie))\nforall x (Goldplate(x, henrietta) -> Broker(x, torrie))\nforall x (Unwritten(x) and Goldplate(x, amelita) -> Goldplate(amelita, henrietta))\n\nAgrestic(hetti)\n\nBroker(hetti, henrietta) and forall x (Broker(x, henrietta) -> Goldplate(x, torrie)) -> therefore Goldplate(hetti, torrie) Goldplate(hetti, torrie) and forall x (Goldplate(x, torrie) -> Agrestic(x)) -> therefore Agrestic(hetti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The elysee refund the kingsly. The elysee is hadean. The elysee is fistulous. The kingsly refund the baxter. The kingsly is correlate. The kingsly redden the elysee. The silva refund the elysee. The silva is hadean. The silva is aboriginal. The silva slot the elysee. The silva slot the baxter. The silva redden the elysee. The baxter is backstage. The baxter is correlate. The baxter slot the elysee. The baxter redden the silva. If the elysee is backstage then the elysee redden the silva. If someone slot the silva then they are fistulous. If someone is fistulous then they visit the baxter. If someone refund the baxter then they like the silva. If someone slot the baxter then they chase the silva. If someone is aboriginal and they like the elysee then the elysee slot the baxter. The kingsly is not fistulous.", "logic": "\nRefund(elysee, kingsly)\nHadean(elysee)\nFistulous(elysee)\nRefund(kingsly, baxter)\nCorrelate(kingsly)\nRedden(kingsly, elysee)\nRefund(silva, elysee)\nHadean(silva)\nAboriginal(silva)\nSlot(silva, elysee)\nSlot(silva, baxter)\nRedden(silva, elysee)\nBackstage(baxter)\nCorrelate(baxter)\nSlot(baxter, elysee)\nRedden(baxter, silva)\nBackstage(elysee) -> Redden(elysee, silva)\nforall x (Slot(x, silva) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Fistulous(x) -> Redden(x, baxter))\nforall x (Refund(x, baxter) -> Slot(x, silva))\nforall x (Slot(x, baxter) -> Refund(x, silva))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) and Slot(x, elysee) -> Slot(elysee, baxter))\n\nnot Fistulous(kingsly)\n\nRefund(kingsly, baxter) and forall x (Refund(x, baxter) -> Slot(x, silva)) -> therefore Slot(kingsly, silva) Slot(kingsly, silva) and forall x (Slot(x, silva) -> Fistulous(x)) -> therefore Fistulous(kingsly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The meg federate the kimmie. The meg is tyrolese. The meg is erroneous. The kimmie federate the eadith. The kimmie is withered. The kimmie prologise the meg. The bradley federate the meg. The bradley is tyrolese. The bradley is dermal. The bradley dispose the meg. The bradley dispose the eadith. The bradley prologise the meg. The eadith is lengthy. The eadith is withered. The eadith dispose the meg. The eadith prologise the bradley. If the meg is lengthy then the meg prologise the bradley. If someone dispose the bradley then they are erroneous. If someone is erroneous then they visit the eadith. If someone federate the eadith then they like the bradley. If someone dispose the eadith then they chase the bradley. If someone is dermal and they like the meg then the meg dispose the eadith. The kimmie prologise the eadith.", "logic": "\nFederate(meg, kimmie)\nTyrolese(meg)\nErroneous(meg)\nFederate(kimmie, eadith)\nWithered(kimmie)\nPrologise(kimmie, meg)\nFederate(bradley, meg)\nTyrolese(bradley)\nDermal(bradley)\nDispose(bradley, meg)\nDispose(bradley, eadith)\nPrologise(bradley, meg)\nLengthy(eadith)\nWithered(eadith)\nDispose(eadith, meg)\nPrologise(eadith, bradley)\nLengthy(meg) -> Prologise(meg, bradley)\nforall x (Dispose(x, bradley) -> Erroneous(x))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) -> Prologise(x, eadith))\nforall x (Federate(x, eadith) -> Dispose(x, bradley))\nforall x (Dispose(x, eadith) -> Federate(x, bradley))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Dispose(x, meg) -> Dispose(meg, eadith))\n\nPrologise(kimmie, eadith)\n\nFederate(kimmie, eadith) and forall x (Federate(x, eadith) -> Dispose(x, bradley)) -> therefore Dispose(kimmie, bradley) Dispose(kimmie, bradley) and forall x (Dispose(x, bradley) -> Erroneous(x)) -> therefore Erroneous(kimmie) Erroneous(kimmie) and forall x (Erroneous(x) -> Prologise(x, eadith)) -> therefore Prologise(kimmie, eadith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The carly succuss the hale. The carly is czaristic. The carly is anuretic. The hale succuss the evaleen. The hale is erudite. The hale conscript the carly. The robb succuss the carly. The robb is czaristic. The robb is weighty. The robb becharm the carly. The robb becharm the evaleen. The robb conscript the carly. The evaleen is bolometric. The evaleen is erudite. The evaleen becharm the carly. The evaleen conscript the robb. If the carly is bolometric then the carly conscript the robb. If someone becharm the robb then they are anuretic. If someone is anuretic then they visit the evaleen. If someone succuss the evaleen then they like the robb. If someone becharm the evaleen then they chase the robb. If someone is weighty and they like the carly then the carly becharm the evaleen. The hale does not visit the evaleen.", "logic": "\nSuccuss(carly, hale)\nCzaristic(carly)\nAnuretic(carly)\nSuccuss(hale, evaleen)\nErudite(hale)\nConscript(hale, carly)\nSuccuss(robb, carly)\nCzaristic(robb)\nWeighty(robb)\nBecharm(robb, carly)\nBecharm(robb, evaleen)\nConscript(robb, carly)\nBolometric(evaleen)\nErudite(evaleen)\nBecharm(evaleen, carly)\nConscript(evaleen, robb)\nBolometric(carly) -> Conscript(carly, robb)\nforall x (Becharm(x, robb) -> Anuretic(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) -> Conscript(x, evaleen))\nforall x (Succuss(x, evaleen) -> Becharm(x, robb))\nforall x (Becharm(x, evaleen) -> Succuss(x, robb))\nforall x (Weighty(x) and Becharm(x, carly) -> Becharm(carly, evaleen))\n\nnot Conscript(hale, evaleen)\n\nSuccuss(hale, evaleen) and forall x (Succuss(x, evaleen) -> Becharm(x, robb)) -> therefore Becharm(hale, robb) Becharm(hale, robb) and forall x (Becharm(x, robb) -> Anuretic(x)) -> therefore Anuretic(hale) Anuretic(hale) and forall x (Anuretic(x) -> Conscript(x, evaleen)) -> therefore Conscript(hale, evaleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The ally comment the charlene. The ally is wedded. The ally is unfruitful. The charlene comment the ewart. The charlene is dishonest. The charlene mistreat the ally. The rickard comment the ally. The rickard is wedded. The rickard is somnific. The rickard pitchfork the ally. The rickard pitchfork the ewart. The rickard mistreat the ally. The ewart is voluntary. The ewart is dishonest. The ewart pitchfork the ally. The ewart mistreat the rickard. If the ally is voluntary then the ally mistreat the rickard. If someone pitchfork the rickard then they are unfruitful. If someone is unfruitful then they visit the ewart. If someone comment the ewart then they like the rickard. If someone pitchfork the ewart then they chase the rickard. If someone is somnific and they like the ally then the ally pitchfork the ewart. The rickard does not visit the ewart.", "logic": "\nComment(ally, charlene)\nWedded(ally)\nUnfruitful(ally)\nComment(charlene, ewart)\nDishonest(charlene)\nMistreat(charlene, ally)\nComment(rickard, ally)\nWedded(rickard)\nSomnific(rickard)\nPitchfork(rickard, ally)\nPitchfork(rickard, ewart)\nMistreat(rickard, ally)\nVoluntary(ewart)\nDishonest(ewart)\nPitchfork(ewart, ally)\nMistreat(ewart, rickard)\nVoluntary(ally) -> Mistreat(ally, rickard)\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, rickard) -> Unfruitful(x))\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) -> Mistreat(x, ewart))\nforall x (Comment(x, ewart) -> Pitchfork(x, rickard))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, ewart) -> Comment(x, rickard))\nforall x (Somnific(x) and Pitchfork(x, ally) -> Pitchfork(ally, ewart))\n\nnot Mistreat(rickard, ewart)\n\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) -> Mistreat(x, ewart)) <- forall x (Pitchfork(x, rickard) -> Unfruitful(x)) <- forall x (Comment(x, ewart) -> Pitchfork(x, rickard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The phyllys mothball the hertha. The phyllys is spinal. The phyllys is milklike. The hertha mothball the joya. The hertha is capsular. The hertha decease the phyllys. The xymenes mothball the phyllys. The xymenes is spinal. The xymenes is gonadal. The xymenes amplify the phyllys. The xymenes amplify the joya. The xymenes decease the phyllys. The joya is fiendish. The joya is capsular. The joya amplify the phyllys. The joya decease the xymenes. If the phyllys is fiendish then the phyllys decease the xymenes. If someone amplify the xymenes then they are milklike. If someone is milklike then they visit the joya. If someone mothball the joya then they like the xymenes. If someone amplify the joya then they chase the xymenes. If someone is gonadal and they like the phyllys then the phyllys amplify the joya. The joya decease the joya.", "logic": "\nMothball(phyllys, hertha)\nSpinal(phyllys)\nMilklike(phyllys)\nMothball(hertha, joya)\nCapsular(hertha)\nDecease(hertha, phyllys)\nMothball(xymenes, phyllys)\nSpinal(xymenes)\nGonadal(xymenes)\nAmplify(xymenes, phyllys)\nAmplify(xymenes, joya)\nDecease(xymenes, phyllys)\nFiendish(joya)\nCapsular(joya)\nAmplify(joya, phyllys)\nDecease(joya, xymenes)\nFiendish(phyllys) -> Decease(phyllys, xymenes)\nforall x (Amplify(x, xymenes) -> Milklike(x))\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Decease(x, joya))\nforall x (Mothball(x, joya) -> Amplify(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Amplify(x, joya) -> Mothball(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Gonadal(x) and Amplify(x, phyllys) -> Amplify(phyllys, joya))\n\nDecease(joya, joya)\n\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Decease(x, joya)) <- forall x (Amplify(x, xymenes) -> Milklike(x)) <- forall x (Mothball(x, joya) -> Amplify(x, xymenes)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The jaquelin mislay the stace. The jaquelin is arawakan. The jaquelin is glooming. The stace mislay the dorrie. The stace is honest. The stace latinize the jaquelin. The pier mislay the jaquelin. The pier is arawakan. The pier is unreadable. The pier envy the jaquelin. The pier envy the dorrie. The pier latinize the jaquelin. The dorrie is globular. The dorrie is honest. The dorrie envy the jaquelin. The dorrie latinize the pier. If the jaquelin is globular then the jaquelin latinize the pier. If someone envy the pier then they are glooming. If someone is glooming then they visit the dorrie. If someone mislay the dorrie then they like the pier. If someone envy the dorrie then they chase the pier. If someone is unreadable and they like the jaquelin then the jaquelin envy the dorrie. The pier is not glooming.", "logic": "\nMislay(jaquelin, stace)\nArawakan(jaquelin)\nGlooming(jaquelin)\nMislay(stace, dorrie)\nHonest(stace)\nLatinize(stace, jaquelin)\nMislay(pier, jaquelin)\nArawakan(pier)\nUnreadable(pier)\nEnvy(pier, jaquelin)\nEnvy(pier, dorrie)\nLatinize(pier, jaquelin)\nGlobular(dorrie)\nHonest(dorrie)\nEnvy(dorrie, jaquelin)\nLatinize(dorrie, pier)\nGlobular(jaquelin) -> Latinize(jaquelin, pier)\nforall x (Envy(x, pier) -> Glooming(x))\nforall x (Glooming(x) -> Latinize(x, dorrie))\nforall x (Mislay(x, dorrie) -> Envy(x, pier))\nforall x (Envy(x, dorrie) -> Mislay(x, pier))\nforall x (Unreadable(x) and Envy(x, jaquelin) -> Envy(jaquelin, dorrie))\n\nnot Glooming(pier)\n\nforall x (Envy(x, pier) -> Glooming(x)) <- forall x (Mislay(x, dorrie) -> Envy(x, pier)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The nerti castle the camellia. The nerti is rimeless. The nerti is unlocked. The camellia castle the witold. The camellia is coral. The camellia bedaze the nerti. The thedrick castle the nerti. The thedrick is rimeless. The thedrick is flashy. The thedrick answer the nerti. The thedrick answer the witold. The thedrick bedaze the nerti. The witold is uncaulked. The witold is coral. The witold answer the nerti. The witold bedaze the thedrick. If the nerti is uncaulked then the nerti bedaze the thedrick. If someone answer the thedrick then they are unlocked. If someone is unlocked then they visit the witold. If someone castle the witold then they like the thedrick. If someone answer the witold then they chase the thedrick. If someone is flashy and they like the nerti then the nerti answer the witold. The witold answer the thedrick.", "logic": "\nCastle(nerti, camellia)\nRimeless(nerti)\nUnlocked(nerti)\nCastle(camellia, witold)\nCoral(camellia)\nBedaze(camellia, nerti)\nCastle(thedrick, nerti)\nRimeless(thedrick)\nFlashy(thedrick)\nAnswer(thedrick, nerti)\nAnswer(thedrick, witold)\nBedaze(thedrick, nerti)\nUncaulked(witold)\nCoral(witold)\nAnswer(witold, nerti)\nBedaze(witold, thedrick)\nUncaulked(nerti) -> Bedaze(nerti, thedrick)\nforall x (Answer(x, thedrick) -> Unlocked(x))\nforall x (Unlocked(x) -> Bedaze(x, witold))\nforall x (Castle(x, witold) -> Answer(x, thedrick))\nforall x (Answer(x, witold) -> Castle(x, thedrick))\nforall x (Flashy(x) and Answer(x, nerti) -> Answer(nerti, witold))\n\nAnswer(witold, thedrick)\n\nforall x (Castle(x, witold) -> Answer(x, thedrick)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The hester microwave the peri. The hester is antitumor. The hester is additional. The peri microwave the alvera. The peri is labored. The peri popularise the hester. The marieann microwave the hester. The marieann is antitumor. The marieann is ungraceful. The marieann trample the hester. The marieann trample the alvera. The marieann popularise the hester. The alvera is euphoriant. The alvera is labored. The alvera trample the hester. The alvera popularise the marieann. If the hester is euphoriant then the hester popularise the marieann. If someone trample the marieann then they are additional. If someone is additional then they visit the alvera. If someone microwave the alvera then they like the marieann. If someone trample the alvera then they chase the marieann. If someone is ungraceful and they like the hester then the hester trample the alvera. The hester does not chase the hester.", "logic": "\nMicrowave(hester, peri)\nAntitumor(hester)\nAdditional(hester)\nMicrowave(peri, alvera)\nLabored(peri)\nPopularise(peri, hester)\nMicrowave(marieann, hester)\nAntitumor(marieann)\nUngraceful(marieann)\nTrample(marieann, hester)\nTrample(marieann, alvera)\nPopularise(marieann, hester)\nEuphoriant(alvera)\nLabored(alvera)\nTrample(alvera, hester)\nPopularise(alvera, marieann)\nEuphoriant(hester) -> Popularise(hester, marieann)\nforall x (Trample(x, marieann) -> Additional(x))\nforall x (Additional(x) -> Popularise(x, alvera))\nforall x (Microwave(x, alvera) -> Trample(x, marieann))\nforall x (Trample(x, alvera) -> Microwave(x, marieann))\nforall x (Ungraceful(x) and Trample(x, hester) -> Trample(hester, alvera))\n\nnot Microwave(hester, hester)\n\nnot Microwave(hester, hester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The godfry slither the gaston. The godfry is oratorical. The godfry is unpromised. The gaston slither the dominique. The gaston is unwatchful. The gaston taunt the godfry. The kalindi slither the godfry. The kalindi is oratorical. The kalindi is sweltry. The kalindi watch the godfry. The kalindi watch the dominique. The kalindi taunt the godfry. The dominique is untutored. The dominique is unwatchful. The dominique watch the godfry. The dominique taunt the kalindi. If the godfry is untutored then the godfry taunt the kalindi. If someone watch the kalindi then they are unpromised. If someone is unpromised then they visit the dominique. If someone slither the dominique then they like the kalindi. If someone watch the dominique then they chase the kalindi. If someone is sweltry and they like the godfry then the godfry watch the dominique. The dominique watch the dominique.", "logic": "\nSlither(godfry, gaston)\nOratorical(godfry)\nUnpromised(godfry)\nSlither(gaston, dominique)\nUnwatchful(gaston)\nTaunt(gaston, godfry)\nSlither(kalindi, godfry)\nOratorical(kalindi)\nSweltry(kalindi)\nWatch(kalindi, godfry)\nWatch(kalindi, dominique)\nTaunt(kalindi, godfry)\nUntutored(dominique)\nUnwatchful(dominique)\nWatch(dominique, godfry)\nTaunt(dominique, kalindi)\nUntutored(godfry) -> Taunt(godfry, kalindi)\nforall x (Watch(x, kalindi) -> Unpromised(x))\nforall x (Unpromised(x) -> Taunt(x, dominique))\nforall x (Slither(x, dominique) -> Watch(x, kalindi))\nforall x (Watch(x, dominique) -> Slither(x, kalindi))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Watch(x, godfry) -> Watch(godfry, dominique))\n\nWatch(dominique, dominique)\n\nWatch(dominique, dominique) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The alfreda sudate the andre. The alfreda is feisty. The alfreda is amniotic. The andre sudate the maridel. The andre is procurable. The andre state the alfreda. The averill sudate the alfreda. The averill is feisty. The averill is tweedy. The averill instruct the alfreda. The averill instruct the maridel. The averill state the alfreda. The maridel is tetragonal. The maridel is procurable. The maridel instruct the alfreda. The maridel state the averill. If the alfreda is tetragonal then the alfreda state the averill. If someone instruct the averill then they are amniotic. If someone is amniotic then they visit the maridel. If someone sudate the maridel then they like the averill. If someone instruct the maridel then they chase the averill. If someone is tweedy and they like the alfreda then the alfreda instruct the maridel. The maridel is not tweedy.", "logic": "\nSudate(alfreda, andre)\nFeisty(alfreda)\nAmniotic(alfreda)\nSudate(andre, maridel)\nProcurable(andre)\nState(andre, alfreda)\nSudate(averill, alfreda)\nFeisty(averill)\nTweedy(averill)\nInstruct(averill, alfreda)\nInstruct(averill, maridel)\nState(averill, alfreda)\nTetragonal(maridel)\nProcurable(maridel)\nInstruct(maridel, alfreda)\nState(maridel, averill)\nTetragonal(alfreda) -> State(alfreda, averill)\nforall x (Instruct(x, averill) -> Amniotic(x))\nforall x (Amniotic(x) -> State(x, maridel))\nforall x (Sudate(x, maridel) -> Instruct(x, averill))\nforall x (Instruct(x, maridel) -> Sudate(x, averill))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Instruct(x, alfreda) -> Instruct(alfreda, maridel))\n\nnot Tweedy(maridel)\n\nnot Tweedy(maridel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The mirelle disburse the barny. The mirelle is precordial. The mirelle is momentary. The barny disburse the randee. The barny is lethal. The barny boil the mirelle. The olivette disburse the mirelle. The olivette is precordial. The olivette is hurried. The olivette foliate the mirelle. The olivette foliate the randee. The olivette boil the mirelle. The randee is bronchitic. The randee is lethal. The randee foliate the mirelle. The randee boil the olivette. If the mirelle is bronchitic then the mirelle boil the olivette. If someone foliate the olivette then they are momentary. If someone is momentary then they visit the randee. If someone disburse the randee then they like the olivette. If someone foliate the randee then they chase the olivette. If someone is hurried and they like the mirelle then the mirelle foliate the randee. The barny disburse the barny.", "logic": "\nDisburse(mirelle, barny)\nPrecordial(mirelle)\nMomentary(mirelle)\nDisburse(barny, randee)\nLethal(barny)\nBoil(barny, mirelle)\nDisburse(olivette, mirelle)\nPrecordial(olivette)\nHurried(olivette)\nFoliate(olivette, mirelle)\nFoliate(olivette, randee)\nBoil(olivette, mirelle)\nBronchitic(randee)\nLethal(randee)\nFoliate(randee, mirelle)\nBoil(randee, olivette)\nBronchitic(mirelle) -> Boil(mirelle, olivette)\nforall x (Foliate(x, olivette) -> Momentary(x))\nforall x (Momentary(x) -> Boil(x, randee))\nforall x (Disburse(x, randee) -> Foliate(x, olivette))\nforall x (Foliate(x, randee) -> Disburse(x, olivette))\nforall x (Hurried(x) and Foliate(x, mirelle) -> Foliate(mirelle, randee))\n\nDisburse(barny, barny)\n\nDisburse(barny, barny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "Robby is unmilitary. Asia is crenulated. Asia is not cochlear. Asia is refulgent. Finn is not executable. Finn is crenulated. Finn is not unmilitary. Young people are latinate. Red people are titillated. Quiet, executable people are not titillated. All executable, latinate people are refulgent. If Robby is crenulated then Robby is executable. Young, latinate people are executable. Asia is not cochlear.", "logic": "\nUnmilitary(robby)\nCrenulated(asia)\nnot Cochlear(asia)\nRefulgent(asia)\nnot Executable(finn)\nCrenulated(finn)\nnot Unmilitary(finn)\nforall x (Refulgent(x) -> Latinate(x))\nforall x (Cochlear(x) -> Titillated(x))\nforall x (Crenulated(x) and Executable(x) -> not Titillated(x))\nforall x (Executable(x) and Latinate(x) -> Refulgent(x))\nCrenulated(robby) -> Executable(robby)\nforall x (Refulgent(x) and Latinate(x) -> Executable(x))\n\nnot Cochlear(asia)\n\ntherefore not Cochlear(asia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Thayne is insidious. Chloette is caudated. Chloette is not vowellike. Chloette is aramaic. Pace is not bounderish. Pace is caudated. Pace is not insidious. Young people are kittenish. Red people are touchable. Quiet, bounderish people are not touchable. All bounderish, kittenish people are aramaic. If Thayne is caudated then Thayne is bounderish. Young, kittenish people are bounderish. Chloette is not caudated.", "logic": "\nInsidious(thayne)\nCaudated(chloette)\nnot Vowellike(chloette)\nAramaic(chloette)\nnot Bounderish(pace)\nCaudated(pace)\nnot Insidious(pace)\nforall x (Aramaic(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Touchable(x))\nforall x (Caudated(x) and Bounderish(x) -> not Touchable(x))\nforall x (Bounderish(x) and Kittenish(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nCaudated(thayne) -> Bounderish(thayne)\nforall x (Aramaic(x) and Kittenish(x) -> Bounderish(x))\n\nnot Caudated(chloette)\n\ntherefore Caudated(chloette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Piet is uncordial. Nathaniel is conductive. Nathaniel is not saute. Nathaniel is splashed. Claudette is not geodetic. Claudette is conductive. Claudette is not uncordial. Young people are cyrillic. Red people are mellowed. Quiet, geodetic people are not mellowed. All geodetic, cyrillic people are splashed. If Piet is conductive then Piet is geodetic. Young, cyrillic people are geodetic. Nathaniel is cyrillic.", "logic": "\nUncordial(piet)\nConductive(nathaniel)\nnot Saute(nathaniel)\nSplashed(nathaniel)\nnot Geodetic(claudette)\nConductive(claudette)\nnot Uncordial(claudette)\nforall x (Splashed(x) -> Cyrillic(x))\nforall x (Saute(x) -> Mellowed(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Geodetic(x) -> not Mellowed(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) and Cyrillic(x) -> Splashed(x))\nConductive(piet) -> Geodetic(piet)\nforall x (Splashed(x) and Cyrillic(x) -> Geodetic(x))\n\nCyrillic(nathaniel)\n\nSplashed(nathaniel) and forall x (Splashed(x) -> Cyrillic(x)) -> therefore Cyrillic(nathaniel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Ida is xcviii. Stern is unpaid. Stern is not accretive. Stern is axenic. Carie is not prominent. Carie is unpaid. Carie is not xcviii. Young people are smooth. Red people are rouged. Quiet, prominent people are not rouged. All prominent, smooth people are axenic. If Ida is unpaid then Ida is prominent. Young, smooth people are prominent. Stern is not smooth.", "logic": "\nXcviii(ida)\nUnpaid(stern)\nnot Accretive(stern)\nAxenic(stern)\nnot Prominent(carie)\nUnpaid(carie)\nnot Xcviii(carie)\nforall x (Axenic(x) -> Smooth(x))\nforall x (Accretive(x) -> Rouged(x))\nforall x (Unpaid(x) and Prominent(x) -> not Rouged(x))\nforall x (Prominent(x) and Smooth(x) -> Axenic(x))\nUnpaid(ida) -> Prominent(ida)\nforall x (Axenic(x) and Smooth(x) -> Prominent(x))\n\nnot Smooth(stern)\n\nAxenic(stern) and forall x (Axenic(x) -> Smooth(x)) -> therefore Smooth(stern)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Augustina is pulpy. Hayden is unlike. Hayden is not ascending. Hayden is monophonic. Kelsey is not zonal. Kelsey is unlike. Kelsey is not pulpy. Young people are thermal. Red people are hempen. Quiet, zonal people are not hempen. All zonal, thermal people are monophonic. If Augustina is unlike then Augustina is zonal. Young, thermal people are zonal. Hayden is zonal.", "logic": "\nPulpy(augustina)\nUnlike(hayden)\nnot Ascending(hayden)\nMonophonic(hayden)\nnot Zonal(kelsey)\nUnlike(kelsey)\nnot Pulpy(kelsey)\nforall x (Monophonic(x) -> Thermal(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Unlike(x) and Zonal(x) -> not Hempen(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Thermal(x) -> Monophonic(x))\nUnlike(augustina) -> Zonal(augustina)\nforall x (Monophonic(x) and Thermal(x) -> Zonal(x))\n\nZonal(hayden)\n\nMonophonic(hayden) and forall x (Monophonic(x) -> Thermal(x)) -> therefore Thermal(hayden) Monophonic(hayden) and Thermal(hayden) and forall x (Monophonic(x) and Thermal(x) -> Zonal(x)) -> therefore Zonal(hayden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Miguela is amino. Skelly is clxxx. Skelly is not canadian. Skelly is submerged. Franklyn is not razorback. Franklyn is clxxx. Franklyn is not amino. Young people are semestrial. Red people are slicked. Quiet, razorback people are not slicked. All razorback, semestrial people are submerged. If Miguela is clxxx then Miguela is razorback. Young, semestrial people are razorback. Skelly is not razorback.", "logic": "\nAmino(miguela)\nClxxx(skelly)\nnot Canadian(skelly)\nSubmerged(skelly)\nnot Razorback(franklyn)\nClxxx(franklyn)\nnot Amino(franklyn)\nforall x (Submerged(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Canadian(x) -> Slicked(x))\nforall x (Clxxx(x) and Razorback(x) -> not Slicked(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) and Semestrial(x) -> Submerged(x))\nClxxx(miguela) -> Razorback(miguela)\nforall x (Submerged(x) and Semestrial(x) -> Razorback(x))\n\nnot Razorback(skelly)\n\nSubmerged(skelly) and forall x (Submerged(x) -> Semestrial(x)) -> therefore Semestrial(skelly) Submerged(skelly) and Semestrial(skelly) and forall x (Submerged(x) and Semestrial(x) -> Razorback(x)) -> therefore Razorback(skelly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Gae is booked. Gaylene is temperate. Gaylene is not cardinal. Gaylene is masterly. Alonzo is not empowered. Alonzo is temperate. Alonzo is not booked. Young people are tethered. Red people are uneven. Quiet, empowered people are not uneven. All empowered, tethered people are masterly. If Gae is temperate then Gae is empowered. Young, tethered people are empowered. Gaylene is not uneven.", "logic": "\nBooked(gae)\nTemperate(gaylene)\nnot Cardinal(gaylene)\nMasterly(gaylene)\nnot Empowered(alonzo)\nTemperate(alonzo)\nnot Booked(alonzo)\nforall x (Masterly(x) -> Tethered(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) -> Uneven(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) and Empowered(x) -> not Uneven(x))\nforall x (Empowered(x) and Tethered(x) -> Masterly(x))\nTemperate(gae) -> Empowered(gae)\nforall x (Masterly(x) and Tethered(x) -> Empowered(x))\n\nnot Uneven(gaylene)\n\nMasterly(gaylene) and forall x (Masterly(x) -> Tethered(x)) -> therefore Tethered(gaylene) Masterly(gaylene) and Tethered(gaylene) and forall x (Masterly(x) and Tethered(x) -> Empowered(x)) -> therefore Empowered(gaylene) Temperate(gaylene) and Empowered(gaylene) and forall x (Temperate(x) and Empowered(x) -> not Uneven(x)) -> therefore not Uneven(gaylene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Tedi is foliaged. Gabbey is macedonian. Gabbey is not snappy. Gabbey is sigmoid. Honoria is not tapered. Honoria is macedonian. Honoria is not foliaged. Young people are staccato. Red people are chordal. Quiet, tapered people are not chordal. All tapered, staccato people are sigmoid. If Tedi is macedonian then Tedi is tapered. Young, staccato people are tapered. Gabbey is chordal.", "logic": "\nFoliaged(tedi)\nMacedonian(gabbey)\nnot Snappy(gabbey)\nSigmoid(gabbey)\nnot Tapered(honoria)\nMacedonian(honoria)\nnot Foliaged(honoria)\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) -> Staccato(x))\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> Chordal(x))\nforall x (Macedonian(x) and Tapered(x) -> not Chordal(x))\nforall x (Tapered(x) and Staccato(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nMacedonian(tedi) -> Tapered(tedi)\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) and Staccato(x) -> Tapered(x))\n\nChordal(gabbey)\n\nSigmoid(gabbey) and forall x (Sigmoid(x) -> Staccato(x)) -> therefore Staccato(gabbey) Sigmoid(gabbey) and Staccato(gabbey) and forall x (Sigmoid(x) and Staccato(x) -> Tapered(x)) -> therefore Tapered(gabbey) Macedonian(gabbey) and Tapered(gabbey) and forall x (Macedonian(x) and Tapered(x) -> not Chordal(x)) -> therefore not Chordal(gabbey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Elle is worried. Jackelyn is favourable. Jackelyn is not untrue. Jackelyn is dreadful. Rivkah is not breezy. Rivkah is favourable. Rivkah is not worried. Young people are original. Red people are ruby. Quiet, breezy people are not ruby. All breezy, original people are dreadful. If Elle is favourable then Elle is breezy. Young, original people are breezy. Rivkah is not original.", "logic": "\nWorried(elle)\nFavourable(jackelyn)\nnot Untrue(jackelyn)\nDreadful(jackelyn)\nnot Breezy(rivkah)\nFavourable(rivkah)\nnot Worried(rivkah)\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> Original(x))\nforall x (Untrue(x) -> Ruby(x))\nforall x (Favourable(x) and Breezy(x) -> not Ruby(x))\nforall x (Breezy(x) and Original(x) -> Dreadful(x))\nFavourable(elle) -> Breezy(elle)\nforall x (Dreadful(x) and Original(x) -> Breezy(x))\n\nnot Original(rivkah)\n\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> Original(x)) <- forall x (Breezy(x) and Original(x) -> Dreadful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Barde is boxy. Hewett is unplumbed. Hewett is not ideational. Hewett is certain. Walt is not ordinal. Walt is unplumbed. Walt is not boxy. Young people are reptilian. Red people are prototypal. Quiet, ordinal people are not prototypal. All ordinal, reptilian people are certain. If Barde is unplumbed then Barde is ordinal. Young, reptilian people are ordinal. Walt is certain.", "logic": "\nBoxy(barde)\nUnplumbed(hewett)\nnot Ideational(hewett)\nCertain(hewett)\nnot Ordinal(walt)\nUnplumbed(walt)\nnot Boxy(walt)\nforall x (Certain(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Ideational(x) -> Prototypal(x))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) and Ordinal(x) -> not Prototypal(x))\nforall x (Ordinal(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Certain(x))\nUnplumbed(barde) -> Ordinal(barde)\nforall x (Certain(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Ordinal(x))\n\nCertain(walt)\n\nforall x (Ordinal(x) and Reptilian(x) -> Certain(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Annalise is plotted. Ardella is running. Ardella is not vinegary. Ardella is esteemed. Byron is not pulpy. Byron is running. Byron is not plotted. Young people are hominine. Red people are olympian. Quiet, pulpy people are not olympian. All pulpy, hominine people are esteemed. If Annalise is running then Annalise is pulpy. Young, hominine people are pulpy. Annalise is not esteemed.", "logic": "\nPlotted(annalise)\nRunning(ardella)\nnot Vinegary(ardella)\nEsteemed(ardella)\nnot Pulpy(byron)\nRunning(byron)\nnot Plotted(byron)\nforall x (Esteemed(x) -> Hominine(x))\nforall x (Vinegary(x) -> Olympian(x))\nforall x (Running(x) and Pulpy(x) -> not Olympian(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and Hominine(x) -> Esteemed(x))\nRunning(annalise) -> Pulpy(annalise)\nforall x (Esteemed(x) and Hominine(x) -> Pulpy(x))\n\nnot Esteemed(annalise)\n\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and Hominine(x) -> Esteemed(x)) <- Running(annalise) -> Pulpy(annalise) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Tracee is unformed. Anatoly is arborical. Anatoly is not eyeless. Anatoly is equal. Koralle is not mesmerized. Koralle is arborical. Koralle is not unformed. Young people are sessile. Red people are unassigned. Quiet, mesmerized people are not unassigned. All mesmerized, sessile people are equal. If Tracee is arborical then Tracee is mesmerized. Young, sessile people are mesmerized. Tracee is sessile.", "logic": "\nUnformed(tracee)\nArborical(anatoly)\nnot Eyeless(anatoly)\nEqual(anatoly)\nnot Mesmerized(koralle)\nArborical(koralle)\nnot Unformed(koralle)\nforall x (Equal(x) -> Sessile(x))\nforall x (Eyeless(x) -> Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Arborical(x) and Mesmerized(x) -> not Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Sessile(x) -> Equal(x))\nArborical(tracee) -> Mesmerized(tracee)\nforall x (Equal(x) and Sessile(x) -> Mesmerized(x))\n\nSessile(tracee)\n\nforall x (Equal(x) -> Sessile(x)) <- forall x (Mesmerized(x) and Sessile(x) -> Equal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Liana is jingoistic. Bunny is piebald. Bunny is not rotational. Bunny is hermitic. Randi is not backstage. Randi is piebald. Randi is not jingoistic. Young people are contested. Red people are plaintive. Quiet, backstage people are not plaintive. All backstage, contested people are hermitic. If Liana is piebald then Liana is backstage. Young, contested people are backstage. Liana is not piebald.", "logic": "\nJingoistic(liana)\nPiebald(bunny)\nnot Rotational(bunny)\nHermitic(bunny)\nnot Backstage(randi)\nPiebald(randi)\nnot Jingoistic(randi)\nforall x (Hermitic(x) -> Contested(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> Plaintive(x))\nforall x (Piebald(x) and Backstage(x) -> not Plaintive(x))\nforall x (Backstage(x) and Contested(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nPiebald(liana) -> Backstage(liana)\nforall x (Hermitic(x) and Contested(x) -> Backstage(x))\n\nnot Piebald(liana)\n\nnot Piebald(liana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Lacee is bats. Valina is crippling. Valina is not little. Valina is naughty. Spencer is not busybodied. Spencer is crippling. Spencer is not bats. Young people are demonic. Red people are shod. Quiet, busybodied people are not shod. All busybodied, demonic people are naughty. If Lacee is crippling then Lacee is busybodied. Young, demonic people are busybodied. Spencer is little.", "logic": "\nBats(lacee)\nCrippling(valina)\nnot Little(valina)\nNaughty(valina)\nnot Busybodied(spencer)\nCrippling(spencer)\nnot Bats(spencer)\nforall x (Naughty(x) -> Demonic(x))\nforall x (Little(x) -> Shod(x))\nforall x (Crippling(x) and Busybodied(x) -> not Shod(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) and Demonic(x) -> Naughty(x))\nCrippling(lacee) -> Busybodied(lacee)\nforall x (Naughty(x) and Demonic(x) -> Busybodied(x))\n\nLittle(spencer)\n\nLittle(spencer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Stacy is unrested. Jennifer is smiling. Jennifer is not coetaneous. Jennifer is novel. Juliann is not redemptory. Juliann is smiling. Juliann is not unrested. Young people are rational. Red people are repeatable. Quiet, redemptory people are not repeatable. All redemptory, rational people are novel. If Stacy is smiling then Stacy is redemptory. Young, rational people are redemptory. Jennifer is not unrested.", "logic": "\nUnrested(stacy)\nSmiling(jennifer)\nnot Coetaneous(jennifer)\nNovel(jennifer)\nnot Redemptory(juliann)\nSmiling(juliann)\nnot Unrested(juliann)\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Rational(x))\nforall x (Coetaneous(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Smiling(x) and Redemptory(x) -> not Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Redemptory(x) and Rational(x) -> Novel(x))\nSmiling(stacy) -> Redemptory(stacy)\nforall x (Novel(x) and Rational(x) -> Redemptory(x))\n\nnot Unrested(jennifer)\n\nnot Unrested(jennifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Cathleen is acapnial. Lia is exportable. Lia is not parched. Lia is weakening. Della is not cornish. Della is exportable. Della is not acapnial. Young people are albuminous. Red people are chummy. Quiet, cornish people are not chummy. All cornish, albuminous people are weakening. If Cathleen is exportable then Cathleen is cornish. Young, albuminous people are cornish. Cathleen is parched.", "logic": "\nAcapnial(cathleen)\nExportable(lia)\nnot Parched(lia)\nWeakening(lia)\nnot Cornish(della)\nExportable(della)\nnot Acapnial(della)\nforall x (Weakening(x) -> Albuminous(x))\nforall x (Parched(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) and Cornish(x) -> not Chummy(x))\nforall x (Cornish(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Weakening(x))\nExportable(cathleen) -> Cornish(cathleen)\nforall x (Weakening(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Cornish(x))\n\nParched(cathleen)\n\nParched(cathleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "The catarina is acapnotic. The catarina is passe. The catarina is giddy. The catarina is lxxii. The catarina is revelatory. The catarina privatise the tybie. The catarina psalm the tybie. The catarina disgrace the tybie. The tybie is acapnotic. The tybie is passe. The tybie is giddy. The tybie is revelatory. The tybie privatise the catarina. The tybie psalm the catarina. The tybie disgrace the catarina. If someone disgrace the catarina then they are acapnotic. If someone psalm the catarina then they are acapnotic. If someone psalm the catarina and they see the tybie then the tybie is lxxii. If someone psalm the tybie and the tybie is lxxii then they see the catarina. If the catarina privatise the tybie then the catarina is acapnotic. If someone privatise the catarina then they see the tybie. If the tybie is passe and the tybie privatise the catarina then the tybie psalm the catarina. If someone privatise the tybie then the tybie psalm the catarina. The catarina privatise the tybie.", "logic": "\nAcapnotic(catarina)\nPasse(catarina)\nGiddy(catarina)\nLxxii(catarina)\nRevelatory(catarina)\nPrivatise(catarina, tybie)\nPsalm(catarina, tybie)\nDisgrace(catarina, tybie)\nAcapnotic(tybie)\nPasse(tybie)\nGiddy(tybie)\nRevelatory(tybie)\nPrivatise(tybie, catarina)\nPsalm(tybie, catarina)\nDisgrace(tybie, catarina)\nforall x (Disgrace(x, catarina) -> Acapnotic(x))\nforall x (Psalm(x, catarina) -> Acapnotic(x))\nforall x (Psalm(x, catarina) and Psalm(x, tybie) -> Lxxii(tybie))\nforall x (Psalm(x, tybie) and Lxxii(tybie) -> Psalm(x, catarina))\nPrivatise(catarina, tybie) -> Acapnotic(catarina)\nforall x (Privatise(x, catarina) -> Psalm(x, tybie))\nPasse(tybie) and Privatise(tybie, catarina) -> Psalm(tybie, catarina)\nforall x (Privatise(x, tybie) -> Psalm(tybie, catarina))\n\nPrivatise(catarina, tybie)\n\ntherefore Privatise(catarina, tybie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The katrinka is intuitive. The katrinka is beardown. The katrinka is contrasty. The katrinka is unguided. The katrinka is extrovert. The katrinka moor the jamima. The katrinka hesitate the jamima. The katrinka ting the jamima. The jamima is intuitive. The jamima is beardown. The jamima is contrasty. The jamima is extrovert. The jamima moor the katrinka. The jamima hesitate the katrinka. The jamima ting the katrinka. If someone ting the katrinka then they are intuitive. If someone hesitate the katrinka then they are intuitive. If someone hesitate the katrinka and they see the jamima then the jamima is unguided. If someone hesitate the jamima and the jamima is unguided then they see the katrinka. If the katrinka moor the jamima then the katrinka is intuitive. If someone moor the katrinka then they see the jamima. If the jamima is beardown and the jamima moor the katrinka then the jamima hesitate the katrinka. If someone moor the jamima then the jamima hesitate the katrinka. The katrinka does not visit the jamima.", "logic": "\nIntuitive(katrinka)\nBeardown(katrinka)\nContrasty(katrinka)\nUnguided(katrinka)\nExtrovert(katrinka)\nMoor(katrinka, jamima)\nHesitate(katrinka, jamima)\nTing(katrinka, jamima)\nIntuitive(jamima)\nBeardown(jamima)\nContrasty(jamima)\nExtrovert(jamima)\nMoor(jamima, katrinka)\nHesitate(jamima, katrinka)\nTing(jamima, katrinka)\nforall x (Ting(x, katrinka) -> Intuitive(x))\nforall x (Hesitate(x, katrinka) -> Intuitive(x))\nforall x (Hesitate(x, katrinka) and Hesitate(x, jamima) -> Unguided(jamima))\nforall x (Hesitate(x, jamima) and Unguided(jamima) -> Hesitate(x, katrinka))\nMoor(katrinka, jamima) -> Intuitive(katrinka)\nforall x (Moor(x, katrinka) -> Hesitate(x, jamima))\nBeardown(jamima) and Moor(jamima, katrinka) -> Hesitate(jamima, katrinka)\nforall x (Moor(x, jamima) -> Hesitate(jamima, katrinka))\n\nnot Ting(katrinka, jamima)\n\ntherefore Ting(katrinka, jamima)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The bunnie is cathectic. The bunnie is overjoyed. The bunnie is cortical. The bunnie is larger. The bunnie is blockaded. The bunnie rack the broddie. The bunnie bracket the broddie. The bunnie creolize the broddie. The broddie is cathectic. The broddie is overjoyed. The broddie is cortical. The broddie is blockaded. The broddie rack the bunnie. The broddie bracket the bunnie. The broddie creolize the bunnie. If someone creolize the bunnie then they are cathectic. If someone bracket the bunnie then they are cathectic. If someone bracket the bunnie and they see the broddie then the broddie is larger. If someone bracket the broddie and the broddie is larger then they see the bunnie. If the bunnie rack the broddie then the bunnie is cathectic. If someone rack the bunnie then they see the broddie. If the broddie is overjoyed and the broddie rack the bunnie then the broddie bracket the bunnie. If someone rack the broddie then the broddie bracket the bunnie. The broddie bracket the broddie.", "logic": "\nCathectic(bunnie)\nOverjoyed(bunnie)\nCortical(bunnie)\nLarger(bunnie)\nBlockaded(bunnie)\nRack(bunnie, broddie)\nBracket(bunnie, broddie)\nCreolize(bunnie, broddie)\nCathectic(broddie)\nOverjoyed(broddie)\nCortical(broddie)\nBlockaded(broddie)\nRack(broddie, bunnie)\nBracket(broddie, bunnie)\nCreolize(broddie, bunnie)\nforall x (Creolize(x, bunnie) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Bracket(x, bunnie) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Bracket(x, bunnie) and Bracket(x, broddie) -> Larger(broddie))\nforall x (Bracket(x, broddie) and Larger(broddie) -> Bracket(x, bunnie))\nRack(bunnie, broddie) -> Cathectic(bunnie)\nforall x (Rack(x, bunnie) -> Bracket(x, broddie))\nOverjoyed(broddie) and Rack(broddie, bunnie) -> Bracket(broddie, bunnie)\nforall x (Rack(x, broddie) -> Bracket(broddie, bunnie))\n\nBracket(broddie, broddie)\n\nRack(broddie, bunnie) and forall x (Rack(x, bunnie) -> Bracket(x, broddie)) -> therefore Bracket(broddie, broddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The jaclyn is nervy. The jaclyn is frowzled. The jaclyn is maggoty. The jaclyn is lowly. The jaclyn is spunky. The jaclyn trot the ozzy. The jaclyn invalidate the ozzy. The jaclyn equalize the ozzy. The ozzy is nervy. The ozzy is frowzled. The ozzy is maggoty. The ozzy is spunky. The ozzy trot the jaclyn. The ozzy invalidate the jaclyn. The ozzy equalize the jaclyn. If someone equalize the jaclyn then they are nervy. If someone invalidate the jaclyn then they are nervy. If someone invalidate the jaclyn and they see the ozzy then the ozzy is lowly. If someone invalidate the ozzy and the ozzy is lowly then they see the jaclyn. If the jaclyn trot the ozzy then the jaclyn is nervy. If someone trot the jaclyn then they see the ozzy. If the ozzy is frowzled and the ozzy trot the jaclyn then the ozzy invalidate the jaclyn. If someone trot the ozzy then the ozzy invalidate the jaclyn. The ozzy does not see the ozzy.", "logic": "\nNervy(jaclyn)\nFrowzled(jaclyn)\nMaggoty(jaclyn)\nLowly(jaclyn)\nSpunky(jaclyn)\nTrot(jaclyn, ozzy)\nInvalidate(jaclyn, ozzy)\nEqualize(jaclyn, ozzy)\nNervy(ozzy)\nFrowzled(ozzy)\nMaggoty(ozzy)\nSpunky(ozzy)\nTrot(ozzy, jaclyn)\nInvalidate(ozzy, jaclyn)\nEqualize(ozzy, jaclyn)\nforall x (Equalize(x, jaclyn) -> Nervy(x))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, jaclyn) -> Nervy(x))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, jaclyn) and Invalidate(x, ozzy) -> Lowly(ozzy))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, ozzy) and Lowly(ozzy) -> Invalidate(x, jaclyn))\nTrot(jaclyn, ozzy) -> Nervy(jaclyn)\nforall x (Trot(x, jaclyn) -> Invalidate(x, ozzy))\nFrowzled(ozzy) and Trot(ozzy, jaclyn) -> Invalidate(ozzy, jaclyn)\nforall x (Trot(x, ozzy) -> Invalidate(ozzy, jaclyn))\n\nnot Invalidate(ozzy, ozzy)\n\nTrot(ozzy, jaclyn) and forall x (Trot(x, jaclyn) -> Invalidate(x, ozzy)) -> therefore Invalidate(ozzy, ozzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The kyle is windblown. The kyle is bountiful. The kyle is queenly. The kyle is azonic. The kyle is botuliform. The kyle ennoble the wilow. The kyle clink the wilow. The kyle glorify the wilow. The wilow is windblown. The wilow is bountiful. The wilow is queenly. The wilow is botuliform. The wilow ennoble the kyle. The wilow clink the kyle. The wilow glorify the kyle. If someone glorify the kyle then they are windblown. If someone clink the kyle then they are windblown. If someone clink the kyle and they see the wilow then the wilow is azonic. If someone clink the wilow and the wilow is azonic then they see the kyle. If the kyle ennoble the wilow then the kyle is windblown. If someone ennoble the kyle then they see the wilow. If the wilow is bountiful and the wilow ennoble the kyle then the wilow clink the kyle. If someone ennoble the wilow then the wilow clink the kyle. The wilow is azonic.", "logic": "\nWindblown(kyle)\nBountiful(kyle)\nQueenly(kyle)\nAzonic(kyle)\nBotuliform(kyle)\nEnnoble(kyle, wilow)\nClink(kyle, wilow)\nGlorify(kyle, wilow)\nWindblown(wilow)\nBountiful(wilow)\nQueenly(wilow)\nBotuliform(wilow)\nEnnoble(wilow, kyle)\nClink(wilow, kyle)\nGlorify(wilow, kyle)\nforall x (Glorify(x, kyle) -> Windblown(x))\nforall x (Clink(x, kyle) -> Windblown(x))\nforall x (Clink(x, kyle) and Clink(x, wilow) -> Azonic(wilow))\nforall x (Clink(x, wilow) and Azonic(wilow) -> Clink(x, kyle))\nEnnoble(kyle, wilow) -> Windblown(kyle)\nforall x (Ennoble(x, kyle) -> Clink(x, wilow))\nBountiful(wilow) and Ennoble(wilow, kyle) -> Clink(wilow, kyle)\nforall x (Ennoble(x, wilow) -> Clink(wilow, kyle))\n\nAzonic(wilow)\n\nEnnoble(wilow, kyle) and forall x (Ennoble(x, kyle) -> Clink(x, wilow)) -> therefore Clink(wilow, wilow) Clink(wilow, kyle) and Clink(wilow, wilow) and forall x (Clink(x, kyle) and Clink(x, wilow) -> Azonic(wilow)) -> therefore Azonic(wilow)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The giffy is colloidal. The giffy is boreal. The giffy is irruptive. The giffy is unwed. The giffy is decent. The giffy barf the kareem. The giffy spatchcock the kareem. The giffy snooker the kareem. The kareem is colloidal. The kareem is boreal. The kareem is irruptive. The kareem is decent. The kareem barf the giffy. The kareem spatchcock the giffy. The kareem snooker the giffy. If someone snooker the giffy then they are colloidal. If someone spatchcock the giffy then they are colloidal. If someone spatchcock the giffy and they see the kareem then the kareem is unwed. If someone spatchcock the kareem and the kareem is unwed then they see the giffy. If the giffy barf the kareem then the giffy is colloidal. If someone barf the giffy then they see the kareem. If the kareem is boreal and the kareem barf the giffy then the kareem spatchcock the giffy. If someone barf the kareem then the kareem spatchcock the giffy. The kareem is not unwed.", "logic": "\nColloidal(giffy)\nBoreal(giffy)\nIrruptive(giffy)\nUnwed(giffy)\nDecent(giffy)\nBarf(giffy, kareem)\nSpatchcock(giffy, kareem)\nSnooker(giffy, kareem)\nColloidal(kareem)\nBoreal(kareem)\nIrruptive(kareem)\nDecent(kareem)\nBarf(kareem, giffy)\nSpatchcock(kareem, giffy)\nSnooker(kareem, giffy)\nforall x (Snooker(x, giffy) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, giffy) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, giffy) and Spatchcock(x, kareem) -> Unwed(kareem))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, kareem) and Unwed(kareem) -> Spatchcock(x, giffy))\nBarf(giffy, kareem) -> Colloidal(giffy)\nforall x (Barf(x, giffy) -> Spatchcock(x, kareem))\nBoreal(kareem) and Barf(kareem, giffy) -> Spatchcock(kareem, giffy)\nforall x (Barf(x, kareem) -> Spatchcock(kareem, giffy))\n\nnot Unwed(kareem)\n\nBarf(kareem, giffy) and forall x (Barf(x, giffy) -> Spatchcock(x, kareem)) -> therefore Spatchcock(kareem, kareem) Spatchcock(kareem, giffy) and Spatchcock(kareem, kareem) and forall x (Spatchcock(x, giffy) and Spatchcock(x, kareem) -> Unwed(kareem)) -> therefore Unwed(kareem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The sophi is diffusive. The sophi is side. The sophi is positional. The sophi is insolvable. The sophi is execrable. The sophi oxidise the mitzi. The sophi scram the mitzi. The sophi animate the mitzi. The mitzi is diffusive. The mitzi is side. The mitzi is positional. The mitzi is execrable. The mitzi oxidise the sophi. The mitzi scram the sophi. The mitzi animate the sophi. If someone animate the sophi then they are diffusive. If someone scram the sophi then they are diffusive. If someone scram the sophi and they see the mitzi then the mitzi is insolvable. If someone scram the mitzi and the mitzi is insolvable then they see the sophi. If the sophi oxidise the mitzi then the sophi is diffusive. If someone oxidise the sophi then they see the mitzi. If the mitzi is side and the mitzi oxidise the sophi then the mitzi scram the sophi. If someone oxidise the mitzi then the mitzi scram the sophi. The sophi scram the sophi.", "logic": "\nDiffusive(sophi)\nSide(sophi)\nPositional(sophi)\nInsolvable(sophi)\nExecrable(sophi)\nOxidise(sophi, mitzi)\nScram(sophi, mitzi)\nAnimate(sophi, mitzi)\nDiffusive(mitzi)\nSide(mitzi)\nPositional(mitzi)\nExecrable(mitzi)\nOxidise(mitzi, sophi)\nScram(mitzi, sophi)\nAnimate(mitzi, sophi)\nforall x (Animate(x, sophi) -> Diffusive(x))\nforall x (Scram(x, sophi) -> Diffusive(x))\nforall x (Scram(x, sophi) and Scram(x, mitzi) -> Insolvable(mitzi))\nforall x (Scram(x, mitzi) and Insolvable(mitzi) -> Scram(x, sophi))\nOxidise(sophi, mitzi) -> Diffusive(sophi)\nforall x (Oxidise(x, sophi) -> Scram(x, mitzi))\nSide(mitzi) and Oxidise(mitzi, sophi) -> Scram(mitzi, sophi)\nforall x (Oxidise(x, mitzi) -> Scram(mitzi, sophi))\n\nScram(sophi, sophi)\n\nOxidise(mitzi, sophi) and forall x (Oxidise(x, sophi) -> Scram(x, mitzi)) -> therefore Scram(mitzi, mitzi) Scram(mitzi, sophi) and Scram(mitzi, mitzi) and forall x (Scram(x, sophi) and Scram(x, mitzi) -> Insolvable(mitzi)) -> therefore Insolvable(mitzi) Scram(sophi, mitzi) and Insolvable(mitzi) and forall x (Scram(x, mitzi) and Insolvable(mitzi) -> Scram(x, sophi)) -> therefore Scram(sophi, sophi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The geoffrey is perfect. The geoffrey is appellant. The geoffrey is supperless. The geoffrey is girlish. The geoffrey is rustless. The geoffrey indite the geoff. The geoffrey brazen the geoff. The geoffrey branch the geoff. The geoff is perfect. The geoff is appellant. The geoff is supperless. The geoff is rustless. The geoff indite the geoffrey. The geoff brazen the geoffrey. The geoff branch the geoffrey. If someone branch the geoffrey then they are perfect. If someone brazen the geoffrey then they are perfect. If someone brazen the geoffrey and they see the geoff then the geoff is girlish. If someone brazen the geoff and the geoff is girlish then they see the geoffrey. If the geoffrey indite the geoff then the geoffrey is perfect. If someone indite the geoffrey then they see the geoff. If the geoff is appellant and the geoff indite the geoffrey then the geoff brazen the geoffrey. If someone indite the geoff then the geoff brazen the geoffrey. The geoffrey does not see the geoffrey.", "logic": "\nPerfect(geoffrey)\nAppellant(geoffrey)\nSupperless(geoffrey)\nGirlish(geoffrey)\nRustless(geoffrey)\nIndite(geoffrey, geoff)\nBrazen(geoffrey, geoff)\nBranch(geoffrey, geoff)\nPerfect(geoff)\nAppellant(geoff)\nSupperless(geoff)\nRustless(geoff)\nIndite(geoff, geoffrey)\nBrazen(geoff, geoffrey)\nBranch(geoff, geoffrey)\nforall x (Branch(x, geoffrey) -> Perfect(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x, geoffrey) -> Perfect(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x, geoffrey) and Brazen(x, geoff) -> Girlish(geoff))\nforall x (Brazen(x, geoff) and Girlish(geoff) -> Brazen(x, geoffrey))\nIndite(geoffrey, geoff) -> Perfect(geoffrey)\nforall x (Indite(x, geoffrey) -> Brazen(x, geoff))\nAppellant(geoff) and Indite(geoff, geoffrey) -> Brazen(geoff, geoffrey)\nforall x (Indite(x, geoff) -> Brazen(geoff, geoffrey))\n\nnot Brazen(geoffrey, geoffrey)\n\nIndite(geoff, geoffrey) and forall x (Indite(x, geoffrey) -> Brazen(x, geoff)) -> therefore Brazen(geoff, geoff) Brazen(geoff, geoffrey) and Brazen(geoff, geoff) and forall x (Brazen(x, geoffrey) and Brazen(x, geoff) -> Girlish(geoff)) -> therefore Girlish(geoff) Brazen(geoffrey, geoff) and Girlish(geoff) and forall x (Brazen(x, geoff) and Girlish(geoff) -> Brazen(x, geoffrey)) -> therefore Brazen(geoffrey, geoffrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The flint is filthy. The flint is chaldee. The flint is untrusting. The flint is conic. The flint is homophile. The flint sick the hermon. The flint enliven the hermon. The flint feminize the hermon. The hermon is filthy. The hermon is chaldee. The hermon is untrusting. The hermon is homophile. The hermon sick the flint. The hermon enliven the flint. The hermon feminize the flint. If someone feminize the flint then they are filthy. If someone enliven the flint then they are filthy. If someone enliven the flint and they see the hermon then the hermon is conic. If someone enliven the hermon and the hermon is conic then they see the flint. If the flint sick the hermon then the flint is filthy. If someone sick the flint then they see the hermon. If the hermon is chaldee and the hermon sick the flint then the hermon enliven the flint. If someone sick the hermon then the hermon enliven the flint. The flint does not visit the flint.", "logic": "\nFilthy(flint)\nChaldee(flint)\nUntrusting(flint)\nConic(flint)\nHomophile(flint)\nSick(flint, hermon)\nEnliven(flint, hermon)\nFeminize(flint, hermon)\nFilthy(hermon)\nChaldee(hermon)\nUntrusting(hermon)\nHomophile(hermon)\nSick(hermon, flint)\nEnliven(hermon, flint)\nFeminize(hermon, flint)\nforall x (Feminize(x, flint) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Enliven(x, flint) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Enliven(x, flint) and Enliven(x, hermon) -> Conic(hermon))\nforall x (Enliven(x, hermon) and Conic(hermon) -> Enliven(x, flint))\nSick(flint, hermon) -> Filthy(flint)\nforall x (Sick(x, flint) -> Enliven(x, hermon))\nChaldee(hermon) and Sick(hermon, flint) -> Enliven(hermon, flint)\nforall x (Sick(x, hermon) -> Enliven(hermon, flint))\n\nnot Feminize(flint, flint)\n\nnot Feminize(flint, flint) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The willow is pelecypod. The willow is overnice. The willow is hilarious. The willow is catabatic. The willow is incognito. The willow shore the flint. The willow unscramble the flint. The willow ruggedise the flint. The flint is pelecypod. The flint is overnice. The flint is hilarious. The flint is incognito. The flint shore the willow. The flint unscramble the willow. The flint ruggedise the willow. If someone ruggedise the willow then they are pelecypod. If someone unscramble the willow then they are pelecypod. If someone unscramble the willow and they see the flint then the flint is catabatic. If someone unscramble the flint and the flint is catabatic then they see the willow. If the willow shore the flint then the willow is pelecypod. If someone shore the willow then they see the flint. If the flint is overnice and the flint shore the willow then the flint unscramble the willow. If someone shore the flint then the flint unscramble the willow. The flint shore the flint.", "logic": "\nPelecypod(willow)\nOvernice(willow)\nHilarious(willow)\nCatabatic(willow)\nIncognito(willow)\nShore(willow, flint)\nUnscramble(willow, flint)\nRuggedise(willow, flint)\nPelecypod(flint)\nOvernice(flint)\nHilarious(flint)\nIncognito(flint)\nShore(flint, willow)\nUnscramble(flint, willow)\nRuggedise(flint, willow)\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, willow) -> Pelecypod(x))\nforall x (Unscramble(x, willow) -> Pelecypod(x))\nforall x (Unscramble(x, willow) and Unscramble(x, flint) -> Catabatic(flint))\nforall x (Unscramble(x, flint) and Catabatic(flint) -> Unscramble(x, willow))\nShore(willow, flint) -> Pelecypod(willow)\nforall x (Shore(x, willow) -> Unscramble(x, flint))\nOvernice(flint) and Shore(flint, willow) -> Unscramble(flint, willow)\nforall x (Shore(x, flint) -> Unscramble(flint, willow))\n\nShore(flint, flint)\n\nShore(flint, flint) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The florella is bulbar. The florella is budding. The florella is liveried. The florella is recessive. The florella is brash. The florella foreordain the arnoldo. The florella raid the arnoldo. The florella solidify the arnoldo. The arnoldo is bulbar. The arnoldo is budding. The arnoldo is liveried. The arnoldo is brash. The arnoldo foreordain the florella. The arnoldo raid the florella. The arnoldo solidify the florella. If someone solidify the florella then they are bulbar. If someone raid the florella then they are bulbar. If someone raid the florella and they see the arnoldo then the arnoldo is recessive. If someone raid the arnoldo and the arnoldo is recessive then they see the florella. If the florella foreordain the arnoldo then the florella is bulbar. If someone foreordain the florella then they see the arnoldo. If the arnoldo is budding and the arnoldo foreordain the florella then the arnoldo raid the florella. If someone foreordain the arnoldo then the arnoldo raid the florella. The florella does not need the florella.", "logic": "\nBulbar(florella)\nBudding(florella)\nLiveried(florella)\nRecessive(florella)\nBrash(florella)\nForeordain(florella, arnoldo)\nRaid(florella, arnoldo)\nSolidify(florella, arnoldo)\nBulbar(arnoldo)\nBudding(arnoldo)\nLiveried(arnoldo)\nBrash(arnoldo)\nForeordain(arnoldo, florella)\nRaid(arnoldo, florella)\nSolidify(arnoldo, florella)\nforall x (Solidify(x, florella) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Raid(x, florella) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Raid(x, florella) and Raid(x, arnoldo) -> Recessive(arnoldo))\nforall x (Raid(x, arnoldo) and Recessive(arnoldo) -> Raid(x, florella))\nForeordain(florella, arnoldo) -> Bulbar(florella)\nforall x (Foreordain(x, florella) -> Raid(x, arnoldo))\nBudding(arnoldo) and Foreordain(arnoldo, florella) -> Raid(arnoldo, florella)\nforall x (Foreordain(x, arnoldo) -> Raid(arnoldo, florella))\n\nnot Foreordain(florella, florella)\n\nnot Foreordain(florella, florella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The evelina is sectional. The evelina is poriferous. The evelina is sweltering. The evelina is insensible. The evelina is troubling. The evelina diabolize the carolee. The evelina divine the carolee. The evelina deify the carolee. The carolee is sectional. The carolee is poriferous. The carolee is sweltering. The carolee is troubling. The carolee diabolize the evelina. The carolee divine the evelina. The carolee deify the evelina. If someone deify the evelina then they are sectional. If someone divine the evelina then they are sectional. If someone divine the evelina and they see the carolee then the carolee is insensible. If someone divine the carolee and the carolee is insensible then they see the evelina. If the evelina diabolize the carolee then the evelina is sectional. If someone diabolize the evelina then they see the carolee. If the carolee is poriferous and the carolee diabolize the evelina then the carolee divine the evelina. If someone diabolize the carolee then the carolee divine the evelina. The carolee deify the carolee.", "logic": "\nSectional(evelina)\nPoriferous(evelina)\nSweltering(evelina)\nInsensible(evelina)\nTroubling(evelina)\nDiabolize(evelina, carolee)\nDivine(evelina, carolee)\nDeify(evelina, carolee)\nSectional(carolee)\nPoriferous(carolee)\nSweltering(carolee)\nTroubling(carolee)\nDiabolize(carolee, evelina)\nDivine(carolee, evelina)\nDeify(carolee, evelina)\nforall x (Deify(x, evelina) -> Sectional(x))\nforall x (Divine(x, evelina) -> Sectional(x))\nforall x (Divine(x, evelina) and Divine(x, carolee) -> Insensible(carolee))\nforall x (Divine(x, carolee) and Insensible(carolee) -> Divine(x, evelina))\nDiabolize(evelina, carolee) -> Sectional(evelina)\nforall x (Diabolize(x, evelina) -> Divine(x, carolee))\nPoriferous(carolee) and Diabolize(carolee, evelina) -> Divine(carolee, evelina)\nforall x (Diabolize(x, carolee) -> Divine(carolee, evelina))\n\nDeify(carolee, carolee)\n\nDeify(carolee, carolee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The miquela colly the lily. The miquela is not national. The miquela is scabrous. The miquela lifehack the lily. The lily colly the miquela. The lily is birch. The opalina colly the lily. The opalina daunt the miquela. The opalina does not visit the miquela. The opalina lifehack the codie. The codie daunt the opalina. The codie lifehack the opalina. If the opalina colly the codie and the opalina is not tenth then the codie does not visit the opalina. If something colly the lily and the lily daunt the codie then it colly the miquela. If something lifehack the lily then the lily is birch. If something is voracious then it lifehack the codie. If something colly the miquela then it lifehack the lily. If something colly the lily and it lifehack the codie then the lily daunt the codie. The codie lifehack the opalina.", "logic": "\nColly(miquela, lily)\nnot National(miquela)\nScabrous(miquela)\nLifehack(miquela, lily)\nColly(lily, miquela)\nBirch(lily)\nColly(opalina, lily)\nDaunt(opalina, miquela)\nnot Lifehack(opalina, miquela)\nLifehack(opalina, codie)\nDaunt(codie, opalina)\nLifehack(codie, opalina)\nColly(opalina, codie) and not Tenth(opalina) -> not Lifehack(codie, opalina)\nforall x (Colly(x, lily) and Daunt(lily, codie) -> Colly(x, miquela))\nforall x (Lifehack(x, lily) -> Birch(lily))\nforall x (Voracious(x) -> Lifehack(x, codie))\nforall x (Colly(x, miquela) -> Lifehack(x, lily))\nforall x (Colly(x, lily) and Lifehack(x, codie) -> Daunt(lily, codie))\n\nLifehack(codie, opalina)\n\ntherefore Lifehack(codie, opalina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The silvester extricate the witold. The silvester is not boffo. The silvester is variant. The silvester plate the witold. The witold extricate the silvester. The witold is lobate. The andree extricate the witold. The andree babble the silvester. The andree does not visit the silvester. The andree plate the linnie. The linnie babble the andree. The linnie plate the andree. If the andree extricate the linnie and the andree is not aliphatic then the linnie does not visit the andree. If something extricate the witold and the witold babble the linnie then it extricate the silvester. If something plate the witold then the witold is lobate. If something is homemade then it plate the linnie. If something extricate the silvester then it plate the witold. If something extricate the witold and it plate the linnie then the witold babble the linnie. The andree does not chase the witold.", "logic": "\nExtricate(silvester, witold)\nnot Boffo(silvester)\nVariant(silvester)\nPlate(silvester, witold)\nExtricate(witold, silvester)\nLobate(witold)\nExtricate(andree, witold)\nBabble(andree, silvester)\nnot Plate(andree, silvester)\nPlate(andree, linnie)\nBabble(linnie, andree)\nPlate(linnie, andree)\nExtricate(andree, linnie) and not Aliphatic(andree) -> not Plate(linnie, andree)\nforall x (Extricate(x, witold) and Babble(witold, linnie) -> Extricate(x, silvester))\nforall x (Plate(x, witold) -> Lobate(witold))\nforall x (Homemade(x) -> Plate(x, linnie))\nforall x (Extricate(x, silvester) -> Plate(x, witold))\nforall x (Extricate(x, witold) and Plate(x, linnie) -> Babble(witold, linnie))\n\nnot Extricate(andree, witold)\n\ntherefore Extricate(andree, witold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The kit unlearn the karlotte. The kit is not antitank. The kit is equal. The kit aberrate the karlotte. The karlotte unlearn the kit. The karlotte is tomentose. The shena unlearn the karlotte. The shena iodinate the kit. The shena does not visit the kit. The shena aberrate the karena. The karena iodinate the shena. The karena aberrate the shena. If the shena unlearn the karena and the shena is not superb then the karena does not visit the shena. If something unlearn the karlotte and the karlotte iodinate the karena then it unlearn the kit. If something aberrate the karlotte then the karlotte is tomentose. If something is philatelic then it aberrate the karena. If something unlearn the kit then it aberrate the karlotte. If something unlearn the karlotte and it aberrate the karena then the karlotte iodinate the karena. The karlotte aberrate the karlotte.", "logic": "\nUnlearn(kit, karlotte)\nnot Antitank(kit)\nEqual(kit)\nAberrate(kit, karlotte)\nUnlearn(karlotte, kit)\nTomentose(karlotte)\nUnlearn(shena, karlotte)\nIodinate(shena, kit)\nnot Aberrate(shena, kit)\nAberrate(shena, karena)\nIodinate(karena, shena)\nAberrate(karena, shena)\nUnlearn(shena, karena) and not Superb(shena) -> not Aberrate(karena, shena)\nforall x (Unlearn(x, karlotte) and Iodinate(karlotte, karena) -> Unlearn(x, kit))\nforall x (Aberrate(x, karlotte) -> Tomentose(karlotte))\nforall x (Philatelic(x) -> Aberrate(x, karena))\nforall x (Unlearn(x, kit) -> Aberrate(x, karlotte))\nforall x (Unlearn(x, karlotte) and Aberrate(x, karena) -> Iodinate(karlotte, karena))\n\nAberrate(karlotte, karlotte)\n\nUnlearn(karlotte, kit) and forall x (Unlearn(x, kit) -> Aberrate(x, karlotte)) -> therefore Aberrate(karlotte, karlotte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The joceline freight the tucky. The joceline is not solvent. The joceline is resounding. The joceline shoal the tucky. The tucky freight the joceline. The tucky is diarrhoeic. The jud freight the tucky. The jud embrown the joceline. The jud does not visit the joceline. The jud shoal the frankie. The frankie embrown the jud. The frankie shoal the jud. If the jud freight the frankie and the jud is not utilized then the frankie does not visit the jud. If something freight the tucky and the tucky embrown the frankie then it freight the joceline. If something shoal the tucky then the tucky is diarrhoeic. If something is neotenous then it shoal the frankie. If something freight the joceline then it shoal the tucky. If something freight the tucky and it shoal the frankie then the tucky embrown the frankie. The tucky does not visit the tucky.", "logic": "\nFreight(joceline, tucky)\nnot Solvent(joceline)\nResounding(joceline)\nShoal(joceline, tucky)\nFreight(tucky, joceline)\nDiarrhoeic(tucky)\nFreight(jud, tucky)\nEmbrown(jud, joceline)\nnot Shoal(jud, joceline)\nShoal(jud, frankie)\nEmbrown(frankie, jud)\nShoal(frankie, jud)\nFreight(jud, frankie) and not Utilized(jud) -> not Shoal(frankie, jud)\nforall x (Freight(x, tucky) and Embrown(tucky, frankie) -> Freight(x, joceline))\nforall x (Shoal(x, tucky) -> Diarrhoeic(tucky))\nforall x (Neotenous(x) -> Shoal(x, frankie))\nforall x (Freight(x, joceline) -> Shoal(x, tucky))\nforall x (Freight(x, tucky) and Shoal(x, frankie) -> Embrown(tucky, frankie))\n\nnot Shoal(tucky, tucky)\n\nFreight(tucky, joceline) and forall x (Freight(x, joceline) -> Shoal(x, tucky)) -> therefore Shoal(tucky, tucky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The jenelle patronage the yvette. The jenelle is not demagogic. The jenelle is weary. The jenelle armour the yvette. The yvette patronage the jenelle. The yvette is clanging. The derek patronage the yvette. The derek tweak the jenelle. The derek does not visit the jenelle. The derek armour the dylan. The dylan tweak the derek. The dylan armour the derek. If the derek patronage the dylan and the derek is not huffy then the dylan does not visit the derek. If something patronage the yvette and the yvette tweak the dylan then it patronage the jenelle. If something armour the yvette then the yvette is clanging. If something is boeotian then it armour the dylan. If something patronage the jenelle then it armour the yvette. If something patronage the yvette and it armour the dylan then the yvette tweak the dylan. The derek patronage the jenelle.", "logic": "\nPatronage(jenelle, yvette)\nnot Demagogic(jenelle)\nWeary(jenelle)\nArmour(jenelle, yvette)\nPatronage(yvette, jenelle)\nClanging(yvette)\nPatronage(derek, yvette)\nTweak(derek, jenelle)\nnot Armour(derek, jenelle)\nArmour(derek, dylan)\nTweak(dylan, derek)\nArmour(dylan, derek)\nPatronage(derek, dylan) and not Huffy(derek) -> not Armour(dylan, derek)\nforall x (Patronage(x, yvette) and Tweak(yvette, dylan) -> Patronage(x, jenelle))\nforall x (Armour(x, yvette) -> Clanging(yvette))\nforall x (Boeotian(x) -> Armour(x, dylan))\nforall x (Patronage(x, jenelle) -> Armour(x, yvette))\nforall x (Patronage(x, yvette) and Armour(x, dylan) -> Tweak(yvette, dylan))\n\nPatronage(derek, jenelle)\n\nPatronage(derek, yvette) and Armour(derek, dylan) and forall x (Patronage(x, yvette) and Armour(x, dylan) -> Tweak(yvette, dylan)) -> therefore Tweak(yvette, dylan) Patronage(derek, yvette) and Tweak(yvette, dylan) and forall x (Patronage(x, yvette) and Tweak(yvette, dylan) -> Patronage(x, jenelle)) -> therefore Patronage(derek, jenelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The terencio ramify the dewey. The terencio is not located. The terencio is inimitable. The terencio impinge the dewey. The dewey ramify the terencio. The dewey is monestrous. The thibaut ramify the dewey. The thibaut slabber the terencio. The thibaut does not visit the terencio. The thibaut impinge the urbano. The urbano slabber the thibaut. The urbano impinge the thibaut. If the thibaut ramify the urbano and the thibaut is not blotched then the urbano does not visit the thibaut. If something ramify the dewey and the dewey slabber the urbano then it ramify the terencio. If something impinge the dewey then the dewey is monestrous. If something is vedic then it impinge the urbano. If something ramify the terencio then it impinge the dewey. If something ramify the dewey and it impinge the urbano then the dewey slabber the urbano. The terencio does not chase the terencio.", "logic": "\nRamify(terencio, dewey)\nnot Located(terencio)\nInimitable(terencio)\nImpinge(terencio, dewey)\nRamify(dewey, terencio)\nMonestrous(dewey)\nRamify(thibaut, dewey)\nSlabber(thibaut, terencio)\nnot Impinge(thibaut, terencio)\nImpinge(thibaut, urbano)\nSlabber(urbano, thibaut)\nImpinge(urbano, thibaut)\nRamify(thibaut, urbano) and not Blotched(thibaut) -> not Impinge(urbano, thibaut)\nforall x (Ramify(x, dewey) and Slabber(dewey, urbano) -> Ramify(x, terencio))\nforall x (Impinge(x, dewey) -> Monestrous(dewey))\nforall x (Vedic(x) -> Impinge(x, urbano))\nforall x (Ramify(x, terencio) -> Impinge(x, dewey))\nforall x (Ramify(x, dewey) and Impinge(x, urbano) -> Slabber(dewey, urbano))\n\nnot Ramify(terencio, terencio)\n\nRamify(thibaut, dewey) and Impinge(thibaut, urbano) and forall x (Ramify(x, dewey) and Impinge(x, urbano) -> Slabber(dewey, urbano)) -> therefore Slabber(dewey, urbano) Ramify(terencio, dewey) and Slabber(dewey, urbano) and forall x (Ramify(x, dewey) and Slabber(dewey, urbano) -> Ramify(x, terencio)) -> therefore Ramify(terencio, terencio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The arden bolshevise the pris. The arden is not cordless. The arden is unique. The arden tenderise the pris. The pris bolshevise the arden. The pris is mute. The libbi bolshevise the pris. The libbi jeopardize the arden. The libbi does not visit the arden. The libbi tenderise the korrie. The korrie jeopardize the libbi. The korrie tenderise the libbi. If the libbi bolshevise the korrie and the libbi is not defamatory then the korrie does not visit the libbi. If something bolshevise the pris and the pris jeopardize the korrie then it bolshevise the arden. If something tenderise the pris then the pris is mute. If something is brute then it tenderise the korrie. If something bolshevise the arden then it tenderise the pris. If something bolshevise the pris and it tenderise the korrie then the pris jeopardize the korrie. The libbi tenderise the pris.", "logic": "\nBolshevise(arden, pris)\nnot Cordless(arden)\nUnique(arden)\nTenderise(arden, pris)\nBolshevise(pris, arden)\nMute(pris)\nBolshevise(libbi, pris)\nJeopardize(libbi, arden)\nnot Tenderise(libbi, arden)\nTenderise(libbi, korrie)\nJeopardize(korrie, libbi)\nTenderise(korrie, libbi)\nBolshevise(libbi, korrie) and not Defamatory(libbi) -> not Tenderise(korrie, libbi)\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, pris) and Jeopardize(pris, korrie) -> Bolshevise(x, arden))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, pris) -> Mute(pris))\nforall x (Brute(x) -> Tenderise(x, korrie))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, arden) -> Tenderise(x, pris))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, pris) and Tenderise(x, korrie) -> Jeopardize(pris, korrie))\n\nTenderise(libbi, pris)\n\nBolshevise(libbi, pris) and Tenderise(libbi, korrie) and forall x (Bolshevise(x, pris) and Tenderise(x, korrie) -> Jeopardize(pris, korrie)) -> therefore Jeopardize(pris, korrie) Bolshevise(libbi, pris) and Jeopardize(pris, korrie) and forall x (Bolshevise(x, pris) and Jeopardize(pris, korrie) -> Bolshevise(x, arden)) -> therefore Bolshevise(libbi, arden) Bolshevise(libbi, arden) and forall x (Bolshevise(x, arden) -> Tenderise(x, pris)) -> therefore Tenderise(libbi, pris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The kala ballyhoo the chevalier. The kala is not brachiopod. The kala is squatty. The kala chemisorb the chevalier. The chevalier ballyhoo the kala. The chevalier is bromic. The skipton ballyhoo the chevalier. The skipton edulcorate the kala. The skipton does not visit the kala. The skipton chemisorb the creighton. The creighton edulcorate the skipton. The creighton chemisorb the skipton. If the skipton ballyhoo the creighton and the skipton is not bass then the creighton does not visit the skipton. If something ballyhoo the chevalier and the chevalier edulcorate the creighton then it ballyhoo the kala. If something chemisorb the chevalier then the chevalier is bromic. If something is doughy then it chemisorb the creighton. If something ballyhoo the kala then it chemisorb the chevalier. If something ballyhoo the chevalier and it chemisorb the creighton then the chevalier edulcorate the creighton. The skipton does not visit the chevalier.", "logic": "\nBallyhoo(kala, chevalier)\nnot Brachiopod(kala)\nSquatty(kala)\nChemisorb(kala, chevalier)\nBallyhoo(chevalier, kala)\nBromic(chevalier)\nBallyhoo(skipton, chevalier)\nEdulcorate(skipton, kala)\nnot Chemisorb(skipton, kala)\nChemisorb(skipton, creighton)\nEdulcorate(creighton, skipton)\nChemisorb(creighton, skipton)\nBallyhoo(skipton, creighton) and not Bass(skipton) -> not Chemisorb(creighton, skipton)\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, chevalier) and Edulcorate(chevalier, creighton) -> Ballyhoo(x, kala))\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, chevalier) -> Bromic(chevalier))\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Chemisorb(x, creighton))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, kala) -> Chemisorb(x, chevalier))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, chevalier) and Chemisorb(x, creighton) -> Edulcorate(chevalier, creighton))\n\nnot Chemisorb(skipton, chevalier)\n\nBallyhoo(skipton, chevalier) and Chemisorb(skipton, creighton) and forall x (Ballyhoo(x, chevalier) and Chemisorb(x, creighton) -> Edulcorate(chevalier, creighton)) -> therefore Edulcorate(chevalier, creighton) Ballyhoo(skipton, chevalier) and Edulcorate(chevalier, creighton) and forall x (Ballyhoo(x, chevalier) and Edulcorate(chevalier, creighton) -> Ballyhoo(x, kala)) -> therefore Ballyhoo(skipton, kala) Ballyhoo(skipton, kala) and forall x (Ballyhoo(x, kala) -> Chemisorb(x, chevalier)) -> therefore Chemisorb(skipton, chevalier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The nert brew the pearline. The nert is not zygotic. The nert is oaten. The nert protect the pearline. The pearline brew the nert. The pearline is gifted. The wake brew the pearline. The wake amputate the nert. The wake does not visit the nert. The wake protect the lib. The lib amputate the wake. The lib protect the wake. If the wake brew the lib and the wake is not starchless then the lib does not visit the wake. If something brew the pearline and the pearline amputate the lib then it brew the nert. If something protect the pearline then the pearline is gifted. If something is cuttable then it protect the lib. If something brew the nert then it protect the pearline. If something brew the pearline and it protect the lib then the pearline amputate the lib. The lib does not visit the lib.", "logic": "\nBrew(nert, pearline)\nnot Zygotic(nert)\nOaten(nert)\nProtect(nert, pearline)\nBrew(pearline, nert)\nGifted(pearline)\nBrew(wake, pearline)\nAmputate(wake, nert)\nnot Protect(wake, nert)\nProtect(wake, lib)\nAmputate(lib, wake)\nProtect(lib, wake)\nBrew(wake, lib) and not Starchless(wake) -> not Protect(lib, wake)\nforall x (Brew(x, pearline) and Amputate(pearline, lib) -> Brew(x, nert))\nforall x (Protect(x, pearline) -> Gifted(pearline))\nforall x (Cuttable(x) -> Protect(x, lib))\nforall x (Brew(x, nert) -> Protect(x, pearline))\nforall x (Brew(x, pearline) and Protect(x, lib) -> Amputate(pearline, lib))\n\nnot Protect(lib, lib)\n\nforall x (Cuttable(x) -> Protect(x, lib)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The ignaz attend the don. The ignaz is not soothing. The ignaz is demoniacal. The ignaz protract the don. The don attend the ignaz. The don is smug. The melloney attend the don. The melloney connect the ignaz. The melloney does not visit the ignaz. The melloney protract the raquel. The raquel connect the melloney. The raquel protract the melloney. If the melloney attend the raquel and the melloney is not numerous then the raquel does not visit the melloney. If something attend the don and the don connect the raquel then it attend the ignaz. If something protract the don then the don is smug. If something is amoebous then it protract the raquel. If something attend the ignaz then it protract the don. If something attend the don and it protract the raquel then the don connect the raquel. The ignaz protract the raquel.", "logic": "\nAttend(ignaz, don)\nnot Soothing(ignaz)\nDemoniacal(ignaz)\nProtract(ignaz, don)\nAttend(don, ignaz)\nSmug(don)\nAttend(melloney, don)\nConnect(melloney, ignaz)\nnot Protract(melloney, ignaz)\nProtract(melloney, raquel)\nConnect(raquel, melloney)\nProtract(raquel, melloney)\nAttend(melloney, raquel) and not Numerous(melloney) -> not Protract(raquel, melloney)\nforall x (Attend(x, don) and Connect(don, raquel) -> Attend(x, ignaz))\nforall x (Protract(x, don) -> Smug(don))\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Protract(x, raquel))\nforall x (Attend(x, ignaz) -> Protract(x, don))\nforall x (Attend(x, don) and Protract(x, raquel) -> Connect(don, raquel))\n\nProtract(ignaz, raquel)\n\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Protract(x, raquel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The scotti sculpt the alys. The scotti is not rustic. The scotti is sleepy. The scotti tackle the alys. The alys sculpt the scotti. The alys is premarital. The marybeth sculpt the alys. The marybeth mesmerize the scotti. The marybeth does not visit the scotti. The marybeth tackle the jordan. The jordan mesmerize the marybeth. The jordan tackle the marybeth. If the marybeth sculpt the jordan and the marybeth is not ballistic then the jordan does not visit the marybeth. If something sculpt the alys and the alys mesmerize the jordan then it sculpt the scotti. If something tackle the alys then the alys is premarital. If something is adducting then it tackle the jordan. If something sculpt the scotti then it tackle the alys. If something sculpt the alys and it tackle the jordan then the alys mesmerize the jordan. The jordan does not visit the alys.", "logic": "\nSculpt(scotti, alys)\nnot Rustic(scotti)\nSleepy(scotti)\nTackle(scotti, alys)\nSculpt(alys, scotti)\nPremarital(alys)\nSculpt(marybeth, alys)\nMesmerize(marybeth, scotti)\nnot Tackle(marybeth, scotti)\nTackle(marybeth, jordan)\nMesmerize(jordan, marybeth)\nTackle(jordan, marybeth)\nSculpt(marybeth, jordan) and not Ballistic(marybeth) -> not Tackle(jordan, marybeth)\nforall x (Sculpt(x, alys) and Mesmerize(alys, jordan) -> Sculpt(x, scotti))\nforall x (Tackle(x, alys) -> Premarital(alys))\nforall x (Adducting(x) -> Tackle(x, jordan))\nforall x (Sculpt(x, scotti) -> Tackle(x, alys))\nforall x (Sculpt(x, alys) and Tackle(x, jordan) -> Mesmerize(alys, jordan))\n\nnot Tackle(jordan, alys)\n\nforall x (Sculpt(x, scotti) -> Tackle(x, alys)) <- forall x (Sculpt(x, alys) and Mesmerize(alys, jordan) -> Sculpt(x, scotti)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The neddy delay the andrej. The neddy is not unshoed. The neddy is pinkish. The neddy champion the andrej. The andrej delay the neddy. The andrej is nine. The lorraine delay the andrej. The lorraine fetishize the neddy. The lorraine does not visit the neddy. The lorraine champion the jef. The jef fetishize the lorraine. The jef champion the lorraine. If the lorraine delay the jef and the lorraine is not escaped then the jef does not visit the lorraine. If something delay the andrej and the andrej fetishize the jef then it delay the neddy. If something champion the andrej then the andrej is nine. If something is dystopian then it champion the jef. If something delay the neddy then it champion the andrej. If something delay the andrej and it champion the jef then the andrej fetishize the jef. The jef delay the neddy.", "logic": "\nDelay(neddy, andrej)\nnot Unshoed(neddy)\nPinkish(neddy)\nChampion(neddy, andrej)\nDelay(andrej, neddy)\nNine(andrej)\nDelay(lorraine, andrej)\nFetishize(lorraine, neddy)\nnot Champion(lorraine, neddy)\nChampion(lorraine, jef)\nFetishize(jef, lorraine)\nChampion(jef, lorraine)\nDelay(lorraine, jef) and not Escaped(lorraine) -> not Champion(jef, lorraine)\nforall x (Delay(x, andrej) and Fetishize(andrej, jef) -> Delay(x, neddy))\nforall x (Champion(x, andrej) -> Nine(andrej))\nforall x (Dystopian(x) -> Champion(x, jef))\nforall x (Delay(x, neddy) -> Champion(x, andrej))\nforall x (Delay(x, andrej) and Champion(x, jef) -> Fetishize(andrej, jef))\n\nDelay(jef, neddy)\n\nforall x (Delay(x, andrej) and Fetishize(andrej, jef) -> Delay(x, neddy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The marmaduke spade the corrianne. The marmaduke is not agog. The marmaduke is beardless. The marmaduke assoil the corrianne. The corrianne spade the marmaduke. The corrianne is chafed. The nellie spade the corrianne. The nellie marble the marmaduke. The nellie does not visit the marmaduke. The nellie assoil the mackenzie. The mackenzie marble the nellie. The mackenzie assoil the nellie. If the nellie spade the mackenzie and the nellie is not tall then the mackenzie does not visit the nellie. If something spade the corrianne and the corrianne marble the mackenzie then it spade the marmaduke. If something assoil the corrianne then the corrianne is chafed. If something is specular then it assoil the mackenzie. If something spade the marmaduke then it assoil the corrianne. If something spade the corrianne and it assoil the mackenzie then the corrianne marble the mackenzie. The mackenzie does not see the corrianne.", "logic": "\nSpade(marmaduke, corrianne)\nnot Agog(marmaduke)\nBeardless(marmaduke)\nAssoil(marmaduke, corrianne)\nSpade(corrianne, marmaduke)\nChafed(corrianne)\nSpade(nellie, corrianne)\nMarble(nellie, marmaduke)\nnot Assoil(nellie, marmaduke)\nAssoil(nellie, mackenzie)\nMarble(mackenzie, nellie)\nAssoil(mackenzie, nellie)\nSpade(nellie, mackenzie) and not Tall(nellie) -> not Assoil(mackenzie, nellie)\nforall x (Spade(x, corrianne) and Marble(corrianne, mackenzie) -> Spade(x, marmaduke))\nforall x (Assoil(x, corrianne) -> Chafed(corrianne))\nforall x (Specular(x) -> Assoil(x, mackenzie))\nforall x (Spade(x, marmaduke) -> Assoil(x, corrianne))\nforall x (Spade(x, corrianne) and Assoil(x, mackenzie) -> Marble(corrianne, mackenzie))\n\nnot Marble(mackenzie, corrianne)\n\nnot Marble(mackenzie, corrianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The marv knell the carri. The marv is not cloudless. The marv is distrait. The marv etherise the carri. The carri knell the marv. The carri is dicey. The scarface knell the carri. The scarface pardon the marv. The scarface does not visit the marv. The scarface etherise the dory. The dory pardon the scarface. The dory etherise the scarface. If the scarface knell the dory and the scarface is not silenced then the dory does not visit the scarface. If something knell the carri and the carri pardon the dory then it knell the marv. If something etherise the carri then the carri is dicey. If something is caprine then it etherise the dory. If something knell the marv then it etherise the carri. If something knell the carri and it etherise the dory then the carri pardon the dory. The carri is silenced.", "logic": "\nKnell(marv, carri)\nnot Cloudless(marv)\nDistrait(marv)\nEtherise(marv, carri)\nKnell(carri, marv)\nDicey(carri)\nKnell(scarface, carri)\nPardon(scarface, marv)\nnot Etherise(scarface, marv)\nEtherise(scarface, dory)\nPardon(dory, scarface)\nEtherise(dory, scarface)\nKnell(scarface, dory) and not Silenced(scarface) -> not Etherise(dory, scarface)\nforall x (Knell(x, carri) and Pardon(carri, dory) -> Knell(x, marv))\nforall x (Etherise(x, carri) -> Dicey(carri))\nforall x (Caprine(x) -> Etherise(x, dory))\nforall x (Knell(x, marv) -> Etherise(x, carri))\nforall x (Knell(x, carri) and Etherise(x, dory) -> Pardon(carri, dory))\n\nSilenced(carri)\n\nSilenced(carri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The nonie bath the flem. The nonie is not gleeful. The nonie is atrophic. The nonie bach the flem. The flem bath the nonie. The flem is motive. The maryjane bath the flem. The maryjane granulate the nonie. The maryjane does not visit the nonie. The maryjane bach the lorenza. The lorenza granulate the maryjane. The lorenza bach the maryjane. If the maryjane bath the lorenza and the maryjane is not scapular then the lorenza does not visit the maryjane. If something bath the flem and the flem granulate the lorenza then it bath the nonie. If something bach the flem then the flem is motive. If something is staminate then it bach the lorenza. If something bath the nonie then it bach the flem. If something bath the flem and it bach the lorenza then the flem granulate the lorenza. The lorenza does not chase the lorenza.", "logic": "\nBath(nonie, flem)\nnot Gleeful(nonie)\nAtrophic(nonie)\nBach(nonie, flem)\nBath(flem, nonie)\nMotive(flem)\nBath(maryjane, flem)\nGranulate(maryjane, nonie)\nnot Bach(maryjane, nonie)\nBach(maryjane, lorenza)\nGranulate(lorenza, maryjane)\nBach(lorenza, maryjane)\nBath(maryjane, lorenza) and not Scapular(maryjane) -> not Bach(lorenza, maryjane)\nforall x (Bath(x, flem) and Granulate(flem, lorenza) -> Bath(x, nonie))\nforall x (Bach(x, flem) -> Motive(flem))\nforall x (Staminate(x) -> Bach(x, lorenza))\nforall x (Bath(x, nonie) -> Bach(x, flem))\nforall x (Bath(x, flem) and Bach(x, lorenza) -> Granulate(flem, lorenza))\n\nnot Bath(lorenza, lorenza)\n\nnot Bath(lorenza, lorenza) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The hilliard embellish the janus. The hilliard is not beetling. The hilliard is zany. The hilliard craft the janus. The janus embellish the hilliard. The janus is cataleptic. The quinlan embellish the janus. The quinlan autoclave the hilliard. The quinlan does not visit the hilliard. The quinlan craft the elias. The elias autoclave the quinlan. The elias craft the quinlan. If the quinlan embellish the elias and the quinlan is not olden then the elias does not visit the quinlan. If something embellish the janus and the janus autoclave the elias then it embellish the hilliard. If something craft the janus then the janus is cataleptic. If something is canescent then it craft the elias. If something embellish the hilliard then it craft the janus. If something embellish the janus and it craft the elias then the janus autoclave the elias. The quinlan autoclave the elias.", "logic": "\nEmbellish(hilliard, janus)\nnot Beetling(hilliard)\nZany(hilliard)\nCraft(hilliard, janus)\nEmbellish(janus, hilliard)\nCataleptic(janus)\nEmbellish(quinlan, janus)\nAutoclave(quinlan, hilliard)\nnot Craft(quinlan, hilliard)\nCraft(quinlan, elias)\nAutoclave(elias, quinlan)\nCraft(elias, quinlan)\nEmbellish(quinlan, elias) and not Olden(quinlan) -> not Craft(elias, quinlan)\nforall x (Embellish(x, janus) and Autoclave(janus, elias) -> Embellish(x, hilliard))\nforall x (Craft(x, janus) -> Cataleptic(janus))\nforall x (Canescent(x) -> Craft(x, elias))\nforall x (Embellish(x, hilliard) -> Craft(x, janus))\nforall x (Embellish(x, janus) and Craft(x, elias) -> Autoclave(janus, elias))\n\nAutoclave(quinlan, elias)\n\nAutoclave(quinlan, elias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The gil coil the elspeth. The gil sigh the elspeth. The elspeth is fungible. The bridgett coil the gil. The bridgett expatiate the gil. The bridgett expatiate the elspeth. The gisela coil the gil. If the bridgett expatiate the gisela then the gisela sigh the gil. If someone sigh the elspeth and they need the elspeth then the elspeth expatiate the bridgett. If someone is subnormal and they see the gisela then the gisela is subnormal. If someone expatiate the bridgett and the bridgett coil the gil then they are palpebrate. If someone sigh the gil then they are fungible. If someone coil the elspeth then they need the elspeth. If someone is subnormal then they need the gisela. If someone is lavish and they chase the gisela then they are subnormal. The gil coil the elspeth.", "logic": "\nCoil(gil, elspeth)\nSigh(gil, elspeth)\nFungible(elspeth)\nCoil(bridgett, gil)\nExpatiate(bridgett, gil)\nExpatiate(bridgett, elspeth)\nCoil(gisela, gil)\nExpatiate(bridgett, gisela) -> Sigh(gisela, gil)\nforall x (Sigh(x, elspeth) and Expatiate(x, elspeth) -> Expatiate(elspeth, bridgett))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) and Sigh(x, gisela) -> Subnormal(gisela))\nforall x (Expatiate(x, bridgett) and Coil(bridgett, gil) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Sigh(x, gil) -> Fungible(x))\nforall x (Coil(x, elspeth) -> Expatiate(x, elspeth))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) -> Expatiate(x, gisela))\nforall x (Lavish(x) and Coil(x, gisela) -> Subnormal(x))\n\nCoil(gil, elspeth)\n\ntherefore Coil(gil, elspeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The emmye rebuff the sparky. The emmye advert the sparky. The sparky is detonative. The bancroft rebuff the emmye. The bancroft sort the emmye. The bancroft sort the sparky. The gaby rebuff the emmye. If the bancroft sort the gaby then the gaby advert the emmye. If someone advert the sparky and they need the sparky then the sparky sort the bancroft. If someone is unaided and they see the gaby then the gaby is unaided. If someone sort the bancroft and the bancroft rebuff the emmye then they are rachitic. If someone advert the emmye then they are detonative. If someone rebuff the sparky then they need the sparky. If someone is unaided then they need the gaby. If someone is optimum and they chase the gaby then they are unaided. The emmye does not see the sparky.", "logic": "\nRebuff(emmye, sparky)\nAdvert(emmye, sparky)\nDetonative(sparky)\nRebuff(bancroft, emmye)\nSort(bancroft, emmye)\nSort(bancroft, sparky)\nRebuff(gaby, emmye)\nSort(bancroft, gaby) -> Advert(gaby, emmye)\nforall x (Advert(x, sparky) and Sort(x, sparky) -> Sort(sparky, bancroft))\nforall x (Unaided(x) and Advert(x, gaby) -> Unaided(gaby))\nforall x (Sort(x, bancroft) and Rebuff(bancroft, emmye) -> Rachitic(x))\nforall x (Advert(x, emmye) -> Detonative(x))\nforall x (Rebuff(x, sparky) -> Sort(x, sparky))\nforall x (Unaided(x) -> Sort(x, gaby))\nforall x (Optimum(x) and Rebuff(x, gaby) -> Unaided(x))\n\nnot Advert(emmye, sparky)\n\ntherefore Advert(emmye, sparky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The odell backlog the nani. The odell harpoon the nani. The nani is inapposite. The tasia backlog the odell. The tasia cache the odell. The tasia cache the nani. The frederich backlog the odell. If the tasia cache the frederich then the frederich harpoon the odell. If someone harpoon the nani and they need the nani then the nani cache the tasia. If someone is exaugural and they see the frederich then the frederich is exaugural. If someone cache the tasia and the tasia backlog the odell then they are heroical. If someone harpoon the odell then they are inapposite. If someone backlog the nani then they need the nani. If someone is exaugural then they need the frederich. If someone is lifted and they chase the frederich then they are exaugural. The odell cache the nani.", "logic": "\nBacklog(odell, nani)\nHarpoon(odell, nani)\nInapposite(nani)\nBacklog(tasia, odell)\nCache(tasia, odell)\nCache(tasia, nani)\nBacklog(frederich, odell)\nCache(tasia, frederich) -> Harpoon(frederich, odell)\nforall x (Harpoon(x, nani) and Cache(x, nani) -> Cache(nani, tasia))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) and Harpoon(x, frederich) -> Exaugural(frederich))\nforall x (Cache(x, tasia) and Backlog(tasia, odell) -> Heroical(x))\nforall x (Harpoon(x, odell) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Backlog(x, nani) -> Cache(x, nani))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) -> Cache(x, frederich))\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Backlog(x, frederich) -> Exaugural(x))\n\nCache(odell, nani)\n\nBacklog(odell, nani) and forall x (Backlog(x, nani) -> Cache(x, nani)) -> therefore Cache(odell, nani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The kelley complect the crystal. The kelley felicitate the crystal. The crystal is infrahuman. The beret complect the kelley. The beret express the kelley. The beret express the crystal. The ward complect the kelley. If the beret express the ward then the ward felicitate the kelley. If someone felicitate the crystal and they need the crystal then the crystal express the beret. If someone is bosomy and they see the ward then the ward is bosomy. If someone express the beret and the beret complect the kelley then they are chorionic. If someone felicitate the kelley then they are infrahuman. If someone complect the crystal then they need the crystal. If someone is bosomy then they need the ward. If someone is anamnestic and they chase the ward then they are bosomy. The kelley does not need the crystal.", "logic": "\nComplect(kelley, crystal)\nFelicitate(kelley, crystal)\nInfrahuman(crystal)\nComplect(beret, kelley)\nExpress(beret, kelley)\nExpress(beret, crystal)\nComplect(ward, kelley)\nExpress(beret, ward) -> Felicitate(ward, kelley)\nforall x (Felicitate(x, crystal) and Express(x, crystal) -> Express(crystal, beret))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) and Felicitate(x, ward) -> Bosomy(ward))\nforall x (Express(x, beret) and Complect(beret, kelley) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Felicitate(x, kelley) -> Infrahuman(x))\nforall x (Complect(x, crystal) -> Express(x, crystal))\nforall x (Bosomy(x) -> Express(x, ward))\nforall x (Anamnestic(x) and Complect(x, ward) -> Bosomy(x))\n\nnot Express(kelley, crystal)\n\nComplect(kelley, crystal) and forall x (Complect(x, crystal) -> Express(x, crystal)) -> therefore Express(kelley, crystal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The dynah taper the nanny. The dynah forward the nanny. The nanny is hurried. The garwin taper the dynah. The garwin stereotype the dynah. The garwin stereotype the nanny. The ros taper the dynah. If the garwin stereotype the ros then the ros forward the dynah. If someone forward the nanny and they need the nanny then the nanny stereotype the garwin. If someone is pituitary and they see the ros then the ros is pituitary. If someone stereotype the garwin and the garwin taper the dynah then they are humongous. If someone forward the dynah then they are hurried. If someone taper the nanny then they need the nanny. If someone is pituitary then they need the ros. If someone is void and they chase the ros then they are pituitary. The nanny stereotype the garwin.", "logic": "\nTaper(dynah, nanny)\nForward(dynah, nanny)\nHurried(nanny)\nTaper(garwin, dynah)\nStereotype(garwin, dynah)\nStereotype(garwin, nanny)\nTaper(ros, dynah)\nStereotype(garwin, ros) -> Forward(ros, dynah)\nforall x (Forward(x, nanny) and Stereotype(x, nanny) -> Stereotype(nanny, garwin))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Forward(x, ros) -> Pituitary(ros))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, garwin) and Taper(garwin, dynah) -> Humongous(x))\nforall x (Forward(x, dynah) -> Hurried(x))\nforall x (Taper(x, nanny) -> Stereotype(x, nanny))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) -> Stereotype(x, ros))\nforall x (Void(x) and Taper(x, ros) -> Pituitary(x))\n\nStereotype(nanny, garwin)\n\nTaper(dynah, nanny) and forall x (Taper(x, nanny) -> Stereotype(x, nanny)) -> therefore Stereotype(dynah, nanny) Forward(dynah, nanny) and Stereotype(dynah, nanny) and forall x (Forward(x, nanny) and Stereotype(x, nanny) -> Stereotype(nanny, garwin)) -> therefore Stereotype(nanny, garwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The sawyere narrow the veradis. The sawyere honeycomb the veradis. The veradis is nurtural. The aurelie narrow the sawyere. The aurelie snowboard the sawyere. The aurelie snowboard the veradis. The catha narrow the sawyere. If the aurelie snowboard the catha then the catha honeycomb the sawyere. If someone honeycomb the veradis and they need the veradis then the veradis snowboard the aurelie. If someone is ponderous and they see the catha then the catha is ponderous. If someone snowboard the aurelie and the aurelie narrow the sawyere then they are irreverent. If someone honeycomb the sawyere then they are nurtural. If someone narrow the veradis then they need the veradis. If someone is ponderous then they need the catha. If someone is aggregate and they chase the catha then they are ponderous. The veradis does not need the aurelie.", "logic": "\nNarrow(sawyere, veradis)\nHoneycomb(sawyere, veradis)\nNurtural(veradis)\nNarrow(aurelie, sawyere)\nSnowboard(aurelie, sawyere)\nSnowboard(aurelie, veradis)\nNarrow(catha, sawyere)\nSnowboard(aurelie, catha) -> Honeycomb(catha, sawyere)\nforall x (Honeycomb(x, veradis) and Snowboard(x, veradis) -> Snowboard(veradis, aurelie))\nforall x (Ponderous(x) and Honeycomb(x, catha) -> Ponderous(catha))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, aurelie) and Narrow(aurelie, sawyere) -> Irreverent(x))\nforall x (Honeycomb(x, sawyere) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Narrow(x, veradis) -> Snowboard(x, veradis))\nforall x (Ponderous(x) -> Snowboard(x, catha))\nforall x (Aggregate(x) and Narrow(x, catha) -> Ponderous(x))\n\nnot Snowboard(veradis, aurelie)\n\nNarrow(sawyere, veradis) and forall x (Narrow(x, veradis) -> Snowboard(x, veradis)) -> therefore Snowboard(sawyere, veradis) Honeycomb(sawyere, veradis) and Snowboard(sawyere, veradis) and forall x (Honeycomb(x, veradis) and Snowboard(x, veradis) -> Snowboard(veradis, aurelie)) -> therefore Snowboard(veradis, aurelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The alaine remark the elsie. The alaine repeat the elsie. The elsie is earlier. The lauryn remark the alaine. The lauryn blitz the alaine. The lauryn blitz the elsie. The auguste remark the alaine. If the lauryn blitz the auguste then the auguste repeat the alaine. If someone repeat the elsie and they need the elsie then the elsie blitz the lauryn. If someone is excess and they see the auguste then the auguste is excess. If someone blitz the lauryn and the lauryn remark the alaine then they are cognitive. If someone repeat the alaine then they are earlier. If someone remark the elsie then they need the elsie. If someone is excess then they need the auguste. If someone is beginning and they chase the auguste then they are excess. The elsie is cognitive.", "logic": "\nRemark(alaine, elsie)\nRepeat(alaine, elsie)\nEarlier(elsie)\nRemark(lauryn, alaine)\nBlitz(lauryn, alaine)\nBlitz(lauryn, elsie)\nRemark(auguste, alaine)\nBlitz(lauryn, auguste) -> Repeat(auguste, alaine)\nforall x (Repeat(x, elsie) and Blitz(x, elsie) -> Blitz(elsie, lauryn))\nforall x (Excess(x) and Repeat(x, auguste) -> Excess(auguste))\nforall x (Blitz(x, lauryn) and Remark(lauryn, alaine) -> Cognitive(x))\nforall x (Repeat(x, alaine) -> Earlier(x))\nforall x (Remark(x, elsie) -> Blitz(x, elsie))\nforall x (Excess(x) -> Blitz(x, auguste))\nforall x (Beginning(x) and Remark(x, auguste) -> Excess(x))\n\nCognitive(elsie)\n\nRemark(alaine, elsie) and forall x (Remark(x, elsie) -> Blitz(x, elsie)) -> therefore Blitz(alaine, elsie) Repeat(alaine, elsie) and Blitz(alaine, elsie) and forall x (Repeat(x, elsie) and Blitz(x, elsie) -> Blitz(elsie, lauryn)) -> therefore Blitz(elsie, lauryn) Blitz(elsie, lauryn) and Remark(lauryn, alaine) and forall x (Blitz(x, lauryn) and Remark(lauryn, alaine) -> Cognitive(x)) -> therefore Cognitive(elsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The hunt bowse the brittan. The hunt release the brittan. The brittan is bengali. The addis bowse the hunt. The addis appreciate the hunt. The addis appreciate the brittan. The ambrosio bowse the hunt. If the addis appreciate the ambrosio then the ambrosio release the hunt. If someone release the brittan and they need the brittan then the brittan appreciate the addis. If someone is sickening and they see the ambrosio then the ambrosio is sickening. If someone appreciate the addis and the addis bowse the hunt then they are natural. If someone release the hunt then they are bengali. If someone bowse the brittan then they need the brittan. If someone is sickening then they need the ambrosio. If someone is pyrolytic and they chase the ambrosio then they are sickening. The brittan is not natural.", "logic": "\nBowse(hunt, brittan)\nRelease(hunt, brittan)\nBengali(brittan)\nBowse(addis, hunt)\nAppreciate(addis, hunt)\nAppreciate(addis, brittan)\nBowse(ambrosio, hunt)\nAppreciate(addis, ambrosio) -> Release(ambrosio, hunt)\nforall x (Release(x, brittan) and Appreciate(x, brittan) -> Appreciate(brittan, addis))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Release(x, ambrosio) -> Sickening(ambrosio))\nforall x (Appreciate(x, addis) and Bowse(addis, hunt) -> Natural(x))\nforall x (Release(x, hunt) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Bowse(x, brittan) -> Appreciate(x, brittan))\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Appreciate(x, ambrosio))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) and Bowse(x, ambrosio) -> Sickening(x))\n\nnot Natural(brittan)\n\nBowse(hunt, brittan) and forall x (Bowse(x, brittan) -> Appreciate(x, brittan)) -> therefore Appreciate(hunt, brittan) Release(hunt, brittan) and Appreciate(hunt, brittan) and forall x (Release(x, brittan) and Appreciate(x, brittan) -> Appreciate(brittan, addis)) -> therefore Appreciate(brittan, addis) Appreciate(brittan, addis) and Bowse(addis, hunt) and forall x (Appreciate(x, addis) and Bowse(addis, hunt) -> Natural(x)) -> therefore Natural(brittan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The wynne joyride the kelcie. The wynne ramp the kelcie. The kelcie is rhapsodic. The zeb joyride the wynne. The zeb claver the wynne. The zeb claver the kelcie. The silvia joyride the wynne. If the zeb claver the silvia then the silvia ramp the wynne. If someone ramp the kelcie and they need the kelcie then the kelcie claver the zeb. If someone is crenate and they see the silvia then the silvia is crenate. If someone claver the zeb and the zeb joyride the wynne then they are undeclared. If someone ramp the wynne then they are rhapsodic. If someone joyride the kelcie then they need the kelcie. If someone is crenate then they need the silvia. If someone is proclaimed and they chase the silvia then they are crenate. The zeb is not undeclared.", "logic": "\nJoyride(wynne, kelcie)\nRamp(wynne, kelcie)\nRhapsodic(kelcie)\nJoyride(zeb, wynne)\nClaver(zeb, wynne)\nClaver(zeb, kelcie)\nJoyride(silvia, wynne)\nClaver(zeb, silvia) -> Ramp(silvia, wynne)\nforall x (Ramp(x, kelcie) and Claver(x, kelcie) -> Claver(kelcie, zeb))\nforall x (Crenate(x) and Ramp(x, silvia) -> Crenate(silvia))\nforall x (Claver(x, zeb) and Joyride(zeb, wynne) -> Undeclared(x))\nforall x (Ramp(x, wynne) -> Rhapsodic(x))\nforall x (Joyride(x, kelcie) -> Claver(x, kelcie))\nforall x (Crenate(x) -> Claver(x, silvia))\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) and Joyride(x, silvia) -> Crenate(x))\n\nnot Undeclared(zeb)\n\nforall x (Claver(x, zeb) and Joyride(zeb, wynne) -> Undeclared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The jemmie loan the dwayne. The jemmie affix the dwayne. The dwayne is thundering. The benjie loan the jemmie. The benjie infect the jemmie. The benjie infect the dwayne. The galen loan the jemmie. If the benjie infect the galen then the galen affix the jemmie. If someone affix the dwayne and they need the dwayne then the dwayne infect the benjie. If someone is shrewd and they see the galen then the galen is shrewd. If someone infect the benjie and the benjie loan the jemmie then they are alluvial. If someone affix the jemmie then they are thundering. If someone loan the dwayne then they need the dwayne. If someone is shrewd then they need the galen. If someone is homosexual and they chase the galen then they are shrewd. The jemmie is shrewd.", "logic": "\nLoan(jemmie, dwayne)\nAffix(jemmie, dwayne)\nThundering(dwayne)\nLoan(benjie, jemmie)\nInfect(benjie, jemmie)\nInfect(benjie, dwayne)\nLoan(galen, jemmie)\nInfect(benjie, galen) -> Affix(galen, jemmie)\nforall x (Affix(x, dwayne) and Infect(x, dwayne) -> Infect(dwayne, benjie))\nforall x (Shrewd(x) and Affix(x, galen) -> Shrewd(galen))\nforall x (Infect(x, benjie) and Loan(benjie, jemmie) -> Alluvial(x))\nforall x (Affix(x, jemmie) -> Thundering(x))\nforall x (Loan(x, dwayne) -> Infect(x, dwayne))\nforall x (Shrewd(x) -> Infect(x, galen))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Loan(x, galen) -> Shrewd(x))\n\nShrewd(jemmie)\n\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Loan(x, galen) -> Shrewd(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The shelli grill the angelina. The shelli fall the angelina. The angelina is corporeal. The sherye grill the shelli. The sherye insult the shelli. The sherye insult the angelina. The spiros grill the shelli. If the sherye insult the spiros then the spiros fall the shelli. If someone fall the angelina and they need the angelina then the angelina insult the sherye. If someone is chelonian and they see the spiros then the spiros is chelonian. If someone insult the sherye and the sherye grill the shelli then they are discerning. If someone fall the shelli then they are corporeal. If someone grill the angelina then they need the angelina. If someone is chelonian then they need the spiros. If someone is xlvii and they chase the spiros then they are chelonian. The spiros does not need the spiros.", "logic": "\nGrill(shelli, angelina)\nFall(shelli, angelina)\nCorporeal(angelina)\nGrill(sherye, shelli)\nInsult(sherye, shelli)\nInsult(sherye, angelina)\nGrill(spiros, shelli)\nInsult(sherye, spiros) -> Fall(spiros, shelli)\nforall x (Fall(x, angelina) and Insult(x, angelina) -> Insult(angelina, sherye))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) and Fall(x, spiros) -> Chelonian(spiros))\nforall x (Insult(x, sherye) and Grill(sherye, shelli) -> Discerning(x))\nforall x (Fall(x, shelli) -> Corporeal(x))\nforall x (Grill(x, angelina) -> Insult(x, angelina))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Insult(x, spiros))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) and Grill(x, spiros) -> Chelonian(x))\n\nnot Insult(spiros, spiros)\n\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Insult(x, spiros)) <- forall x (Chelonian(x) and Fall(x, spiros) -> Chelonian(spiros)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The bartel disenable the debera. The bartel fright the debera. The debera is unrenewed. The xena disenable the bartel. The xena supersede the bartel. The xena supersede the debera. The latashia disenable the bartel. If the xena supersede the latashia then the latashia fright the bartel. If someone fright the debera and they need the debera then the debera supersede the xena. If someone is numerate and they see the latashia then the latashia is numerate. If someone supersede the xena and the xena disenable the bartel then they are gargantuan. If someone fright the bartel then they are unrenewed. If someone disenable the debera then they need the debera. If someone is numerate then they need the latashia. If someone is shouldered and they chase the latashia then they are numerate. The xena is unrenewed.", "logic": "\nDisenable(bartel, debera)\nFright(bartel, debera)\nUnrenewed(debera)\nDisenable(xena, bartel)\nSupersede(xena, bartel)\nSupersede(xena, debera)\nDisenable(latashia, bartel)\nSupersede(xena, latashia) -> Fright(latashia, bartel)\nforall x (Fright(x, debera) and Supersede(x, debera) -> Supersede(debera, xena))\nforall x (Numerate(x) and Fright(x, latashia) -> Numerate(latashia))\nforall x (Supersede(x, xena) and Disenable(xena, bartel) -> Gargantuan(x))\nforall x (Fright(x, bartel) -> Unrenewed(x))\nforall x (Disenable(x, debera) -> Supersede(x, debera))\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> Supersede(x, latashia))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Disenable(x, latashia) -> Numerate(x))\n\nUnrenewed(xena)\n\nforall x (Fright(x, bartel) -> Unrenewed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The harmonie bicycle the cathryn. The harmonie babbitt the cathryn. The cathryn is polymeric. The elke bicycle the harmonie. The elke quiz the harmonie. The elke quiz the cathryn. The catlaina bicycle the harmonie. If the elke quiz the catlaina then the catlaina babbitt the harmonie. If someone babbitt the cathryn and they need the cathryn then the cathryn quiz the elke. If someone is uninformed and they see the catlaina then the catlaina is uninformed. If someone quiz the elke and the elke bicycle the harmonie then they are mounted. If someone babbitt the harmonie then they are polymeric. If someone bicycle the cathryn then they need the cathryn. If someone is uninformed then they need the catlaina. If someone is palpatory and they chase the catlaina then they are uninformed. The catlaina is not palpatory.", "logic": "\nBicycle(harmonie, cathryn)\nBabbitt(harmonie, cathryn)\nPolymeric(cathryn)\nBicycle(elke, harmonie)\nQuiz(elke, harmonie)\nQuiz(elke, cathryn)\nBicycle(catlaina, harmonie)\nQuiz(elke, catlaina) -> Babbitt(catlaina, harmonie)\nforall x (Babbitt(x, cathryn) and Quiz(x, cathryn) -> Quiz(cathryn, elke))\nforall x (Uninformed(x) and Babbitt(x, catlaina) -> Uninformed(catlaina))\nforall x (Quiz(x, elke) and Bicycle(elke, harmonie) -> Mounted(x))\nforall x (Babbitt(x, harmonie) -> Polymeric(x))\nforall x (Bicycle(x, cathryn) -> Quiz(x, cathryn))\nforall x (Uninformed(x) -> Quiz(x, catlaina))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Bicycle(x, catlaina) -> Uninformed(x))\n\nnot Palpatory(catlaina)\n\nnot Palpatory(catlaina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The zachary freak the min. The zachary pump the min. The min is gaga. The ave freak the zachary. The ave forbear the zachary. The ave forbear the min. The nicki freak the zachary. If the ave forbear the nicki then the nicki pump the zachary. If someone pump the min and they need the min then the min forbear the ave. If someone is sneering and they see the nicki then the nicki is sneering. If someone forbear the ave and the ave freak the zachary then they are burnable. If someone pump the zachary then they are gaga. If someone freak the min then they need the min. If someone is sneering then they need the nicki. If someone is mercurous and they chase the nicki then they are sneering. The min pump the ave.", "logic": "\nFreak(zachary, min)\nPump(zachary, min)\nGaga(min)\nFreak(ave, zachary)\nForbear(ave, zachary)\nForbear(ave, min)\nFreak(nicki, zachary)\nForbear(ave, nicki) -> Pump(nicki, zachary)\nforall x (Pump(x, min) and Forbear(x, min) -> Forbear(min, ave))\nforall x (Sneering(x) and Pump(x, nicki) -> Sneering(nicki))\nforall x (Forbear(x, ave) and Freak(ave, zachary) -> Burnable(x))\nforall x (Pump(x, zachary) -> Gaga(x))\nforall x (Freak(x, min) -> Forbear(x, min))\nforall x (Sneering(x) -> Forbear(x, nicki))\nforall x (Mercurous(x) and Freak(x, nicki) -> Sneering(x))\n\nPump(min, ave)\n\nPump(min, ave) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The eustacia chaperone the charlott. The eustacia enkindle the charlott. The charlott is doped. The jeannine chaperone the eustacia. The jeannine clue the eustacia. The jeannine clue the charlott. The maritsa chaperone the eustacia. If the jeannine clue the maritsa then the maritsa enkindle the eustacia. If someone enkindle the charlott and they need the charlott then the charlott clue the jeannine. If someone is amoristic and they see the maritsa then the maritsa is amoristic. If someone clue the jeannine and the jeannine chaperone the eustacia then they are deadpan. If someone enkindle the eustacia then they are doped. If someone chaperone the charlott then they need the charlott. If someone is amoristic then they need the maritsa. If someone is thoughtful and they chase the maritsa then they are amoristic. The eustacia does not chase the maritsa.", "logic": "\nChaperone(eustacia, charlott)\nEnkindle(eustacia, charlott)\nDoped(charlott)\nChaperone(jeannine, eustacia)\nClue(jeannine, eustacia)\nClue(jeannine, charlott)\nChaperone(maritsa, eustacia)\nClue(jeannine, maritsa) -> Enkindle(maritsa, eustacia)\nforall x (Enkindle(x, charlott) and Clue(x, charlott) -> Clue(charlott, jeannine))\nforall x (Amoristic(x) and Enkindle(x, maritsa) -> Amoristic(maritsa))\nforall x (Clue(x, jeannine) and Chaperone(jeannine, eustacia) -> Deadpan(x))\nforall x (Enkindle(x, eustacia) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, charlott) -> Clue(x, charlott))\nforall x (Amoristic(x) -> Clue(x, maritsa))\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) and Chaperone(x, maritsa) -> Amoristic(x))\n\nnot Chaperone(eustacia, maritsa)\n\nnot Chaperone(eustacia, maritsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The karla candle the faythe. The karla kayo the faythe. The faythe is royal. The vanda candle the karla. The vanda fuse the karla. The vanda fuse the faythe. The carita candle the karla. If the vanda fuse the carita then the carita kayo the karla. If someone kayo the faythe and they need the faythe then the faythe fuse the vanda. If someone is exact and they see the carita then the carita is exact. If someone fuse the vanda and the vanda candle the karla then they are heartsick. If someone kayo the karla then they are royal. If someone candle the faythe then they need the faythe. If someone is exact then they need the carita. If someone is grateful and they chase the carita then they are exact. The faythe kayo the faythe.", "logic": "\nCandle(karla, faythe)\nKayo(karla, faythe)\nRoyal(faythe)\nCandle(vanda, karla)\nFuse(vanda, karla)\nFuse(vanda, faythe)\nCandle(carita, karla)\nFuse(vanda, carita) -> Kayo(carita, karla)\nforall x (Kayo(x, faythe) and Fuse(x, faythe) -> Fuse(faythe, vanda))\nforall x (Exact(x) and Kayo(x, carita) -> Exact(carita))\nforall x (Fuse(x, vanda) and Candle(vanda, karla) -> Heartsick(x))\nforall x (Kayo(x, karla) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Candle(x, faythe) -> Fuse(x, faythe))\nforall x (Exact(x) -> Fuse(x, carita))\nforall x (Grateful(x) and Candle(x, carita) -> Exact(x))\n\nKayo(faythe, faythe)\n\nKayo(faythe, faythe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "Scott is edentulous. Scott is abaxial. Jefry is pillared. Jefry is edentulous. Jefry is abaxial. Jefry is patronymic. Estelle is calendric. Estelle is nigh. Estelle is edentulous. Estelle is abaxial. Darcy is pillared. Darcy is edentulous. Red, pillared people are edentulous. All calendric people are pillared. If someone is edentulous and greasy then they are pillared. Furry people are greasy. Cold people are edentulous. All edentulous people are calendric. If Jefry is pillared then Jefry is edentulous. All calendric, pillared people are abaxial. Scott is abaxial.", "logic": "\nEdentulous(scott)\nAbaxial(scott)\nPillared(jefry)\nEdentulous(jefry)\nAbaxial(jefry)\nPatronymic(jefry)\nCalendric(estelle)\nNigh(estelle)\nEdentulous(estelle)\nAbaxial(estelle)\nPillared(darcy)\nEdentulous(darcy)\nforall x (Greasy(x) and Pillared(x) -> Edentulous(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Edentulous(x) and Greasy(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Pillared(x) -> Greasy(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) -> Edentulous(x))\nforall x (Edentulous(x) -> Calendric(x))\nPillared(jefry) -> Edentulous(jefry)\nforall x (Calendric(x) and Pillared(x) -> Abaxial(x))\n\nAbaxial(scott)\n\ntherefore Abaxial(scott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Reynard is mormon. Reynard is uppity. Zarah is coral. Zarah is mormon. Zarah is uppity. Zarah is extrinsic. Kakalina is hibernal. Kakalina is mined. Kakalina is mormon. Kakalina is uppity. Doll is coral. Doll is mormon. Red, coral people are mormon. All hibernal people are coral. If someone is mormon and blastular then they are coral. Furry people are blastular. Cold people are mormon. All mormon people are hibernal. If Zarah is coral then Zarah is mormon. All hibernal, coral people are uppity. Kakalina is not uppity.", "logic": "\nMormon(reynard)\nUppity(reynard)\nCoral(zarah)\nMormon(zarah)\nUppity(zarah)\nExtrinsic(zarah)\nHibernal(kakalina)\nMined(kakalina)\nMormon(kakalina)\nUppity(kakalina)\nCoral(doll)\nMormon(doll)\nforall x (Blastular(x) and Coral(x) -> Mormon(x))\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Mormon(x) and Blastular(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Coral(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Mormon(x))\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Hibernal(x))\nCoral(zarah) -> Mormon(zarah)\nforall x (Hibernal(x) and Coral(x) -> Uppity(x))\n\nnot Uppity(kakalina)\n\ntherefore Uppity(kakalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Binny is junoesque. Binny is sooty. Catherin is hadal. Catherin is junoesque. Catherin is sooty. Catherin is acetic. Berke is unsoiled. Berke is cropped. Berke is junoesque. Berke is sooty. Jolee is hadal. Jolee is junoesque. Red, hadal people are junoesque. All unsoiled people are hadal. If someone is junoesque and bilocular then they are hadal. Furry people are bilocular. Cold people are junoesque. All junoesque people are unsoiled. If Catherin is hadal then Catherin is junoesque. All unsoiled, hadal people are sooty. Jolee is bilocular.", "logic": "\nJunoesque(binny)\nSooty(binny)\nHadal(catherin)\nJunoesque(catherin)\nSooty(catherin)\nAcetic(catherin)\nUnsoiled(berke)\nCropped(berke)\nJunoesque(berke)\nSooty(berke)\nHadal(jolee)\nJunoesque(jolee)\nforall x (Bilocular(x) and Hadal(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) -> Hadal(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) and Bilocular(x) -> Hadal(x))\nforall x (Hadal(x) -> Bilocular(x))\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Unsoiled(x))\nHadal(catherin) -> Junoesque(catherin)\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) and Hadal(x) -> Sooty(x))\n\nBilocular(jolee)\n\nHadal(jolee) and forall x (Hadal(x) -> Bilocular(x)) -> therefore Bilocular(jolee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Frances is quenchless. Frances is undetected. Jonah is decrepit. Jonah is quenchless. Jonah is undetected. Jonah is damascene. Ellynn is acidulent. Ellynn is edible. Ellynn is quenchless. Ellynn is undetected. Henrietta is decrepit. Henrietta is quenchless. Red, decrepit people are quenchless. All acidulent people are decrepit. If someone is quenchless and gritty then they are decrepit. Furry people are gritty. Cold people are quenchless. All quenchless people are acidulent. If Jonah is decrepit then Jonah is quenchless. All acidulent, decrepit people are undetected. Jonah is not gritty.", "logic": "\nQuenchless(frances)\nUndetected(frances)\nDecrepit(jonah)\nQuenchless(jonah)\nUndetected(jonah)\nDamascene(jonah)\nAcidulent(ellynn)\nEdible(ellynn)\nQuenchless(ellynn)\nUndetected(ellynn)\nDecrepit(henrietta)\nQuenchless(henrietta)\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Decrepit(x) -> Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Decrepit(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) and Gritty(x) -> Decrepit(x))\nforall x (Decrepit(x) -> Gritty(x))\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nDecrepit(jonah) -> Quenchless(jonah)\nforall x (Acidulent(x) and Decrepit(x) -> Undetected(x))\n\nnot Gritty(jonah)\n\nDecrepit(jonah) and forall x (Decrepit(x) -> Gritty(x)) -> therefore Gritty(jonah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Raphaela is defined. Raphaela is unearthly. Rock is radial. Rock is defined. Rock is unearthly. Rock is enwrapped. Welbie is pendant. Welbie is oxidative. Welbie is defined. Welbie is unearthly. Lyndsey is radial. Lyndsey is defined. Red, radial people are defined. All pendant people are radial. If someone is defined and nonhuman then they are radial. Furry people are nonhuman. Cold people are defined. All defined people are pendant. If Rock is radial then Rock is defined. All pendant, radial people are unearthly. Lyndsey is unearthly.", "logic": "\nDefined(raphaela)\nUnearthly(raphaela)\nRadial(rock)\nDefined(rock)\nUnearthly(rock)\nEnwrapped(rock)\nPendant(welbie)\nOxidative(welbie)\nDefined(welbie)\nUnearthly(welbie)\nRadial(lyndsey)\nDefined(lyndsey)\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) and Radial(x) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> Radial(x))\nforall x (Defined(x) and Nonhuman(x) -> Radial(x))\nforall x (Radial(x) -> Nonhuman(x))\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Defined(x) -> Pendant(x))\nRadial(rock) -> Defined(rock)\nforall x (Pendant(x) and Radial(x) -> Unearthly(x))\n\nUnearthly(lyndsey)\n\nDefined(lyndsey) and forall x (Defined(x) -> Pendant(x)) -> therefore Pendant(lyndsey) Pendant(lyndsey) and Radial(lyndsey) and forall x (Pendant(x) and Radial(x) -> Unearthly(x)) -> therefore Unearthly(lyndsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Darell is sharp. Darell is inst. Lauryn is dionysian. Lauryn is sharp. Lauryn is inst. Lauryn is ungoverned. Dyanna is invidious. Dyanna is dressed. Dyanna is sharp. Dyanna is inst. Ingaberg is dionysian. Ingaberg is sharp. Red, dionysian people are sharp. All invidious people are dionysian. If someone is sharp and mutational then they are dionysian. Furry people are mutational. Cold people are sharp. All sharp people are invidious. If Lauryn is dionysian then Lauryn is sharp. All invidious, dionysian people are inst. Ingaberg is not inst.", "logic": "\nSharp(darell)\nInst(darell)\nDionysian(lauryn)\nSharp(lauryn)\nInst(lauryn)\nUngoverned(lauryn)\nInvidious(dyanna)\nDressed(dyanna)\nSharp(dyanna)\nInst(dyanna)\nDionysian(ingaberg)\nSharp(ingaberg)\nforall x (Mutational(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) -> Dionysian(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) and Mutational(x) -> Dionysian(x))\nforall x (Dionysian(x) -> Mutational(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Invidious(x))\nDionysian(lauryn) -> Sharp(lauryn)\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Inst(x))\n\nnot Inst(ingaberg)\n\nSharp(ingaberg) and forall x (Sharp(x) -> Invidious(x)) -> therefore Invidious(ingaberg) Invidious(ingaberg) and Dionysian(ingaberg) and forall x (Invidious(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Inst(x)) -> therefore Inst(ingaberg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Clarissa is conventual. Clarissa is unfailing. Jacinta is runcinate. Jacinta is conventual. Jacinta is unfailing. Jacinta is forfeit. Agnola is sobersided. Agnola is frisky. Agnola is conventual. Agnola is unfailing. Ludvig is runcinate. Ludvig is conventual. Red, runcinate people are conventual. All sobersided people are runcinate. If someone is conventual and corporate then they are runcinate. Furry people are corporate. Cold people are conventual. All conventual people are sobersided. If Jacinta is runcinate then Jacinta is conventual. All sobersided, runcinate people are unfailing. Clarissa is corporate.", "logic": "\nConventual(clarissa)\nUnfailing(clarissa)\nRuncinate(jacinta)\nConventual(jacinta)\nUnfailing(jacinta)\nForfeit(jacinta)\nSobersided(agnola)\nFrisky(agnola)\nConventual(agnola)\nUnfailing(agnola)\nRuncinate(ludvig)\nConventual(ludvig)\nforall x (Corporate(x) and Runcinate(x) -> Conventual(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) -> Runcinate(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and Corporate(x) -> Runcinate(x))\nforall x (Runcinate(x) -> Corporate(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) -> Conventual(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Sobersided(x))\nRuncinate(jacinta) -> Conventual(jacinta)\nforall x (Sobersided(x) and Runcinate(x) -> Unfailing(x))\n\nCorporate(clarissa)\n\nConventual(clarissa) and forall x (Conventual(x) -> Sobersided(x)) -> therefore Sobersided(clarissa) Sobersided(clarissa) and forall x (Sobersided(x) -> Runcinate(x)) -> therefore Runcinate(clarissa) Runcinate(clarissa) and forall x (Runcinate(x) -> Corporate(x)) -> therefore Corporate(clarissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Rakel is sticky. Rakel is hedonistic. Maribelle is unalarming. Maribelle is sticky. Maribelle is hedonistic. Maribelle is political. Georgiana is pukka. Georgiana is metacarpal. Georgiana is sticky. Georgiana is hedonistic. Spiros is unalarming. Spiros is sticky. Red, unalarming people are sticky. All pukka people are unalarming. If someone is sticky and parhelic then they are unalarming. Furry people are parhelic. Cold people are sticky. All sticky people are pukka. If Maribelle is unalarming then Maribelle is sticky. All pukka, unalarming people are hedonistic. Rakel is not parhelic.", "logic": "\nSticky(rakel)\nHedonistic(rakel)\nUnalarming(maribelle)\nSticky(maribelle)\nHedonistic(maribelle)\nPolitical(maribelle)\nPukka(georgiana)\nMetacarpal(georgiana)\nSticky(georgiana)\nHedonistic(georgiana)\nUnalarming(spiros)\nSticky(spiros)\nforall x (Parhelic(x) and Unalarming(x) -> Sticky(x))\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Unalarming(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) and Parhelic(x) -> Unalarming(x))\nforall x (Unalarming(x) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Sticky(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> Pukka(x))\nUnalarming(maribelle) -> Sticky(maribelle)\nforall x (Pukka(x) and Unalarming(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\n\nnot Parhelic(rakel)\n\nSticky(rakel) and forall x (Sticky(x) -> Pukka(x)) -> therefore Pukka(rakel) Pukka(rakel) and forall x (Pukka(x) -> Unalarming(x)) -> therefore Unalarming(rakel) Unalarming(rakel) and forall x (Unalarming(x) -> Parhelic(x)) -> therefore Parhelic(rakel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Cacilie is dished. Cacilie is kenyan. Koo is shocking. Koo is dished. Koo is kenyan. Koo is reciprocal. Myriam is blond. Myriam is monkish. Myriam is dished. Myriam is kenyan. Christyna is shocking. Christyna is dished. Red, shocking people are dished. All blond people are shocking. If someone is dished and isomeric then they are shocking. Furry people are isomeric. Cold people are dished. All dished people are blond. If Koo is shocking then Koo is dished. All blond, shocking people are kenyan. Koo is not monkish.", "logic": "\nDished(cacilie)\nKenyan(cacilie)\nShocking(koo)\nDished(koo)\nKenyan(koo)\nReciprocal(koo)\nBlond(myriam)\nMonkish(myriam)\nDished(myriam)\nKenyan(myriam)\nShocking(christyna)\nDished(christyna)\nforall x (Isomeric(x) and Shocking(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) -> Shocking(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Shocking(x))\nforall x (Shocking(x) -> Isomeric(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Blond(x))\nShocking(koo) -> Dished(koo)\nforall x (Blond(x) and Shocking(x) -> Kenyan(x))\n\nnot Monkish(koo)\n\nnot Monkish(koo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Felice is southbound. Felice is revived. Caroline is undone. Caroline is southbound. Caroline is revived. Caroline is dishonest. Tobi is ferrous. Tobi is occult. Tobi is southbound. Tobi is revived. Malena is undone. Malena is southbound. Red, undone people are southbound. All ferrous people are undone. If someone is southbound and larger then they are undone. Furry people are larger. Cold people are southbound. All southbound people are ferrous. If Caroline is undone then Caroline is southbound. All ferrous, undone people are revived. Malena is occult.", "logic": "\nSouthbound(felice)\nRevived(felice)\nUndone(caroline)\nSouthbound(caroline)\nRevived(caroline)\nDishonest(caroline)\nFerrous(tobi)\nOccult(tobi)\nSouthbound(tobi)\nRevived(tobi)\nUndone(malena)\nSouthbound(malena)\nforall x (Larger(x) and Undone(x) -> Southbound(x))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Undone(x))\nforall x (Southbound(x) and Larger(x) -> Undone(x))\nforall x (Undone(x) -> Larger(x))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Southbound(x))\nforall x (Southbound(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nUndone(caroline) -> Southbound(caroline)\nforall x (Ferrous(x) and Undone(x) -> Revived(x))\n\nOccult(malena)\n\nOccult(malena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Lem is calando. Lem is fanlike. Job is deuced. Job is calando. Job is fanlike. Job is dipped. Isidore is exotic. Isidore is pouched. Isidore is calando. Isidore is fanlike. Brea is deuced. Brea is calando. Red, deuced people are calando. All exotic people are deuced. If someone is calando and unswayed then they are deuced. Furry people are unswayed. Cold people are calando. All calando people are exotic. If Job is deuced then Job is calando. All exotic, deuced people are fanlike. Brea is not dipped.", "logic": "\nCalando(lem)\nFanlike(lem)\nDeuced(job)\nCalando(job)\nFanlike(job)\nDipped(job)\nExotic(isidore)\nPouched(isidore)\nCalando(isidore)\nFanlike(isidore)\nDeuced(brea)\nCalando(brea)\nforall x (Unswayed(x) and Deuced(x) -> Calando(x))\nforall x (Exotic(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) and Unswayed(x) -> Deuced(x))\nforall x (Deuced(x) -> Unswayed(x))\nforall x (Exotic(x) -> Calando(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Exotic(x))\nDeuced(job) -> Calando(job)\nforall x (Exotic(x) and Deuced(x) -> Fanlike(x))\n\nnot Dipped(brea)\n\nnot Dipped(brea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Gertrude is oafish. Gertrude is blonde. Stella is breeched. Stella is oafish. Stella is blonde. Stella is amoeboid. Kari is pardonable. Kari is perilous. Kari is oafish. Kari is blonde. Dahlia is breeched. Dahlia is oafish. Red, breeched people are oafish. All pardonable people are breeched. If someone is oafish and starving then they are breeched. Furry people are starving. Cold people are oafish. All oafish people are pardonable. If Stella is breeched then Stella is oafish. All pardonable, breeched people are blonde. Kari is amoeboid.", "logic": "\nOafish(gertrude)\nBlonde(gertrude)\nBreeched(stella)\nOafish(stella)\nBlonde(stella)\nAmoeboid(stella)\nPardonable(kari)\nPerilous(kari)\nOafish(kari)\nBlonde(kari)\nBreeched(dahlia)\nOafish(dahlia)\nforall x (Starving(x) and Breeched(x) -> Oafish(x))\nforall x (Pardonable(x) -> Breeched(x))\nforall x (Oafish(x) and Starving(x) -> Breeched(x))\nforall x (Breeched(x) -> Starving(x))\nforall x (Pardonable(x) -> Oafish(x))\nforall x (Oafish(x) -> Pardonable(x))\nBreeched(stella) -> Oafish(stella)\nforall x (Pardonable(x) and Breeched(x) -> Blonde(x))\n\nAmoeboid(kari)\n\nAmoeboid(kari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Nance is unmarked. Nance is columnar. Alden is preserved. Alden is unmarked. Alden is columnar. Alden is fortuitous. Germaine is avifaunal. Germaine is teen. Germaine is unmarked. Germaine is columnar. Rayner is preserved. Rayner is unmarked. Red, preserved people are unmarked. All avifaunal people are preserved. If someone is unmarked and latish then they are preserved. Furry people are latish. Cold people are unmarked. All unmarked people are avifaunal. If Alden is preserved then Alden is unmarked. All avifaunal, preserved people are columnar. Nance is not fortuitous.", "logic": "\nUnmarked(nance)\nColumnar(nance)\nPreserved(alden)\nUnmarked(alden)\nColumnar(alden)\nFortuitous(alden)\nAvifaunal(germaine)\nTeen(germaine)\nUnmarked(germaine)\nColumnar(germaine)\nPreserved(rayner)\nUnmarked(rayner)\nforall x (Latish(x) and Preserved(x) -> Unmarked(x))\nforall x (Avifaunal(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Unmarked(x) and Latish(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Latish(x))\nforall x (Avifaunal(x) -> Unmarked(x))\nforall x (Unmarked(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\nPreserved(alden) -> Unmarked(alden)\nforall x (Avifaunal(x) and Preserved(x) -> Columnar(x))\n\nnot Fortuitous(nance)\n\nnot Fortuitous(nance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Teri is informal. Teri is bloodless. Cathi is fooling. Cathi is informal. Cathi is bloodless. Cathi is hapless. Axel is lovelorn. Axel is liege. Axel is informal. Axel is bloodless. Anselm is fooling. Anselm is informal. Red, fooling people are informal. All lovelorn people are fooling. If someone is informal and balconied then they are fooling. Furry people are balconied. Cold people are informal. All informal people are lovelorn. If Cathi is fooling then Cathi is informal. All lovelorn, fooling people are bloodless. Teri is liege.", "logic": "\nInformal(teri)\nBloodless(teri)\nFooling(cathi)\nInformal(cathi)\nBloodless(cathi)\nHapless(cathi)\nLovelorn(axel)\nLiege(axel)\nInformal(axel)\nBloodless(axel)\nFooling(anselm)\nInformal(anselm)\nforall x (Balconied(x) and Fooling(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Fooling(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) and Balconied(x) -> Fooling(x))\nforall x (Fooling(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\nFooling(cathi) -> Informal(cathi)\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Fooling(x) -> Bloodless(x))\n\nLiege(teri)\n\nLiege(teri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "The candis is zeroth. The candis lace the amanda. The stacee lace the candis. The jessika is zeroth. The amanda is not footling. The amanda restrict the candis. The amanda lace the stacee. If someone lace the stacee then they visit the candis. If someone lace the stacee and they do not need the amanda then the amanda caddie the candis. If someone caddie the stacee then the stacee is biannual. If someone restrict the candis and the candis lace the amanda then they visit the jessika. If the amanda caddie the stacee then the amanda is severe. If someone lace the jessika then the jessika caddie the stacee. The jessika is zeroth.", "logic": "\nZeroth(candis)\nLace(candis, amanda)\nLace(stacee, candis)\nZeroth(jessika)\nnot Footling(amanda)\nRestrict(amanda, candis)\nLace(amanda, stacee)\nforall x (Lace(x, stacee) -> Lace(x, candis))\nforall x (Lace(x, stacee) and not Restrict(x, amanda) -> Caddie(amanda, candis))\nforall x (Caddie(x, stacee) -> Biannual(stacee))\nforall x (Restrict(x, candis) and Lace(candis, amanda) -> Lace(x, jessika))\nCaddie(amanda, stacee) -> Severe(amanda)\nforall x (Lace(x, jessika) -> Caddie(jessika, stacee))\n\nZeroth(jessika)\n\ntherefore Zeroth(jessika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The grazia is gangly. The grazia spill the graig. The obadiah spill the grazia. The randene is gangly. The graig is not achromous. The graig capsulise the grazia. The graig spill the obadiah. If someone spill the obadiah then they visit the grazia. If someone spill the obadiah and they do not need the graig then the graig freckle the grazia. If someone freckle the obadiah then the obadiah is degraded. If someone capsulise the grazia and the grazia spill the graig then they visit the randene. If the graig freckle the obadiah then the graig is botryoid. If someone spill the randene then the randene freckle the obadiah. The graig does not need the grazia.", "logic": "\nGangly(grazia)\nSpill(grazia, graig)\nSpill(obadiah, grazia)\nGangly(randene)\nnot Achromous(graig)\nCapsulise(graig, grazia)\nSpill(graig, obadiah)\nforall x (Spill(x, obadiah) -> Spill(x, grazia))\nforall x (Spill(x, obadiah) and not Capsulise(x, graig) -> Freckle(graig, grazia))\nforall x (Freckle(x, obadiah) -> Degraded(obadiah))\nforall x (Capsulise(x, grazia) and Spill(grazia, graig) -> Spill(x, randene))\nFreckle(graig, obadiah) -> Botryoid(graig)\nforall x (Spill(x, randene) -> Freckle(randene, obadiah))\n\nnot Capsulise(graig, grazia)\n\ntherefore Capsulise(graig, grazia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The marc is aboriginal. The marc pillow the norbert. The rochette pillow the marc. The deva is aboriginal. The norbert is not heavenward. The norbert indwell the marc. The norbert pillow the rochette. If someone pillow the rochette then they visit the marc. If someone pillow the rochette and they do not need the norbert then the norbert whinny the marc. If someone whinny the rochette then the rochette is xxviii. If someone indwell the marc and the marc pillow the norbert then they visit the deva. If the norbert whinny the rochette then the norbert is benthonic. If someone pillow the deva then the deva whinny the rochette. The norbert pillow the marc.", "logic": "\nAboriginal(marc)\nPillow(marc, norbert)\nPillow(rochette, marc)\nAboriginal(deva)\nnot Heavenward(norbert)\nIndwell(norbert, marc)\nPillow(norbert, rochette)\nforall x (Pillow(x, rochette) -> Pillow(x, marc))\nforall x (Pillow(x, rochette) and not Indwell(x, norbert) -> Whinny(norbert, marc))\nforall x (Whinny(x, rochette) -> Xxviii(rochette))\nforall x (Indwell(x, marc) and Pillow(marc, norbert) -> Pillow(x, deva))\nWhinny(norbert, rochette) -> Benthonic(norbert)\nforall x (Pillow(x, deva) -> Whinny(deva, rochette))\n\nPillow(norbert, marc)\n\nPillow(norbert, rochette) and forall x (Pillow(x, rochette) -> Pillow(x, marc)) -> therefore Pillow(norbert, marc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The elfreda is frayed. The elfreda wobble the kipp. The nancie wobble the elfreda. The udell is frayed. The kipp is not fourpenny. The kipp quarter the elfreda. The kipp wobble the nancie. If someone wobble the nancie then they visit the elfreda. If someone wobble the nancie and they do not need the kipp then the kipp parent the elfreda. If someone parent the nancie then the nancie is demented. If someone quarter the elfreda and the elfreda wobble the kipp then they visit the udell. If the kipp parent the nancie then the kipp is blooded. If someone wobble the udell then the udell parent the nancie. The kipp does not visit the udell.", "logic": "\nFrayed(elfreda)\nWobble(elfreda, kipp)\nWobble(nancie, elfreda)\nFrayed(udell)\nnot Fourpenny(kipp)\nQuarter(kipp, elfreda)\nWobble(kipp, nancie)\nforall x (Wobble(x, nancie) -> Wobble(x, elfreda))\nforall x (Wobble(x, nancie) and not Quarter(x, kipp) -> Parent(kipp, elfreda))\nforall x (Parent(x, nancie) -> Demented(nancie))\nforall x (Quarter(x, elfreda) and Wobble(elfreda, kipp) -> Wobble(x, udell))\nParent(kipp, nancie) -> Blooded(kipp)\nforall x (Wobble(x, udell) -> Parent(udell, nancie))\n\nnot Wobble(kipp, udell)\n\nQuarter(kipp, elfreda) and Wobble(elfreda, kipp) and forall x (Quarter(x, elfreda) and Wobble(elfreda, kipp) -> Wobble(x, udell)) -> therefore Wobble(kipp, udell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The zonnya is opportune. The zonnya design the myriam. The isabeau design the zonnya. The hilary is opportune. The myriam is not tailless. The myriam blush the zonnya. The myriam design the isabeau. If someone design the isabeau then they visit the zonnya. If someone design the isabeau and they do not need the myriam then the myriam swig the zonnya. If someone swig the isabeau then the isabeau is psychical. If someone blush the zonnya and the zonnya design the myriam then they visit the hilary. If the myriam swig the isabeau then the myriam is tough. If someone design the hilary then the hilary swig the isabeau. The hilary swig the isabeau.", "logic": "\nOpportune(zonnya)\nDesign(zonnya, myriam)\nDesign(isabeau, zonnya)\nOpportune(hilary)\nnot Tailless(myriam)\nBlush(myriam, zonnya)\nDesign(myriam, isabeau)\nforall x (Design(x, isabeau) -> Design(x, zonnya))\nforall x (Design(x, isabeau) and not Blush(x, myriam) -> Swig(myriam, zonnya))\nforall x (Swig(x, isabeau) -> Psychical(isabeau))\nforall x (Blush(x, zonnya) and Design(zonnya, myriam) -> Design(x, hilary))\nSwig(myriam, isabeau) -> Tough(myriam)\nforall x (Design(x, hilary) -> Swig(hilary, isabeau))\n\nSwig(hilary, isabeau)\n\nBlush(myriam, zonnya) and Design(zonnya, myriam) and forall x (Blush(x, zonnya) and Design(zonnya, myriam) -> Design(x, hilary)) -> therefore Design(myriam, hilary) Design(myriam, hilary) and forall x (Design(x, hilary) -> Swig(hilary, isabeau)) -> therefore Swig(hilary, isabeau)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The marlie is ductile. The marlie seal the stirling. The kacy seal the marlie. The hulda is ductile. The stirling is not olfactory. The stirling narrow the marlie. The stirling seal the kacy. If someone seal the kacy then they visit the marlie. If someone seal the kacy and they do not need the stirling then the stirling jibe the marlie. If someone jibe the kacy then the kacy is retroflex. If someone narrow the marlie and the marlie seal the stirling then they visit the hulda. If the stirling jibe the kacy then the stirling is thundering. If someone seal the hulda then the hulda jibe the kacy. The hulda does not see the kacy.", "logic": "\nDuctile(marlie)\nSeal(marlie, stirling)\nSeal(kacy, marlie)\nDuctile(hulda)\nnot Olfactory(stirling)\nNarrow(stirling, marlie)\nSeal(stirling, kacy)\nforall x (Seal(x, kacy) -> Seal(x, marlie))\nforall x (Seal(x, kacy) and not Narrow(x, stirling) -> Jibe(stirling, marlie))\nforall x (Jibe(x, kacy) -> Retroflex(kacy))\nforall x (Narrow(x, marlie) and Seal(marlie, stirling) -> Seal(x, hulda))\nJibe(stirling, kacy) -> Thundering(stirling)\nforall x (Seal(x, hulda) -> Jibe(hulda, kacy))\n\nnot Jibe(hulda, kacy)\n\nNarrow(stirling, marlie) and Seal(marlie, stirling) and forall x (Narrow(x, marlie) and Seal(marlie, stirling) -> Seal(x, hulda)) -> therefore Seal(stirling, hulda) Seal(stirling, hulda) and forall x (Seal(x, hulda) -> Jibe(hulda, kacy)) -> therefore Jibe(hulda, kacy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The therine is deboned. The therine prank the cayla. The timi prank the therine. The nunzio is deboned. The cayla is not lipped. The cayla lapidify the therine. The cayla prank the timi. If someone prank the timi then they visit the therine. If someone prank the timi and they do not need the cayla then the cayla fusillade the therine. If someone fusillade the timi then the timi is soignee. If someone lapidify the therine and the therine prank the cayla then they visit the nunzio. If the cayla fusillade the timi then the cayla is enteral. If someone prank the nunzio then the nunzio fusillade the timi. The timi is soignee.", "logic": "\nDeboned(therine)\nPrank(therine, cayla)\nPrank(timi, therine)\nDeboned(nunzio)\nnot Lipped(cayla)\nLapidify(cayla, therine)\nPrank(cayla, timi)\nforall x (Prank(x, timi) -> Prank(x, therine))\nforall x (Prank(x, timi) and not Lapidify(x, cayla) -> Fusillade(cayla, therine))\nforall x (Fusillade(x, timi) -> Soignee(timi))\nforall x (Lapidify(x, therine) and Prank(therine, cayla) -> Prank(x, nunzio))\nFusillade(cayla, timi) -> Enteral(cayla)\nforall x (Prank(x, nunzio) -> Fusillade(nunzio, timi))\n\nSoignee(timi)\n\nLapidify(cayla, therine) and Prank(therine, cayla) and forall x (Lapidify(x, therine) and Prank(therine, cayla) -> Prank(x, nunzio)) -> therefore Prank(cayla, nunzio) Prank(cayla, nunzio) and forall x (Prank(x, nunzio) -> Fusillade(nunzio, timi)) -> therefore Fusillade(nunzio, timi) Fusillade(nunzio, timi) and forall x (Fusillade(x, timi) -> Soignee(timi)) -> therefore Soignee(timi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The kevin is whacked. The kevin crenel the catarina. The emilio crenel the kevin. The sibylla is whacked. The catarina is not unfeigned. The catarina skydive the kevin. The catarina crenel the emilio. If someone crenel the emilio then they visit the kevin. If someone crenel the emilio and they do not need the catarina then the catarina mercerise the kevin. If someone mercerise the emilio then the emilio is inside. If someone skydive the kevin and the kevin crenel the catarina then they visit the sibylla. If the catarina mercerise the emilio then the catarina is quebecois. If someone crenel the sibylla then the sibylla mercerise the emilio. The emilio is not inside.", "logic": "\nWhacked(kevin)\nCrenel(kevin, catarina)\nCrenel(emilio, kevin)\nWhacked(sibylla)\nnot Unfeigned(catarina)\nSkydive(catarina, kevin)\nCrenel(catarina, emilio)\nforall x (Crenel(x, emilio) -> Crenel(x, kevin))\nforall x (Crenel(x, emilio) and not Skydive(x, catarina) -> Mercerise(catarina, kevin))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, emilio) -> Inside(emilio))\nforall x (Skydive(x, kevin) and Crenel(kevin, catarina) -> Crenel(x, sibylla))\nMercerise(catarina, emilio) -> Quebecois(catarina)\nforall x (Crenel(x, sibylla) -> Mercerise(sibylla, emilio))\n\nnot Inside(emilio)\n\nSkydive(catarina, kevin) and Crenel(kevin, catarina) and forall x (Skydive(x, kevin) and Crenel(kevin, catarina) -> Crenel(x, sibylla)) -> therefore Crenel(catarina, sibylla) Crenel(catarina, sibylla) and forall x (Crenel(x, sibylla) -> Mercerise(sibylla, emilio)) -> therefore Mercerise(sibylla, emilio) Mercerise(sibylla, emilio) and forall x (Mercerise(x, emilio) -> Inside(emilio)) -> therefore Inside(emilio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The emmalynn is oleophobic. The emmalynn satiate the madelle. The beck satiate the emmalynn. The laetitia is oleophobic. The madelle is not localised. The madelle capsulate the emmalynn. The madelle satiate the beck. If someone satiate the beck then they visit the emmalynn. If someone satiate the beck and they do not need the madelle then the madelle rupture the emmalynn. If someone rupture the beck then the beck is coercive. If someone capsulate the emmalynn and the emmalynn satiate the madelle then they visit the laetitia. If the madelle rupture the beck then the madelle is arched. If someone satiate the laetitia then the laetitia rupture the beck. The beck does not visit the laetitia.", "logic": "\nOleophobic(emmalynn)\nSatiate(emmalynn, madelle)\nSatiate(beck, emmalynn)\nOleophobic(laetitia)\nnot Localised(madelle)\nCapsulate(madelle, emmalynn)\nSatiate(madelle, beck)\nforall x (Satiate(x, beck) -> Satiate(x, emmalynn))\nforall x (Satiate(x, beck) and not Capsulate(x, madelle) -> Rupture(madelle, emmalynn))\nforall x (Rupture(x, beck) -> Coercive(beck))\nforall x (Capsulate(x, emmalynn) and Satiate(emmalynn, madelle) -> Satiate(x, laetitia))\nRupture(madelle, beck) -> Arched(madelle)\nforall x (Satiate(x, laetitia) -> Rupture(laetitia, beck))\n\nnot Satiate(beck, laetitia)\n\nforall x (Capsulate(x, emmalynn) and Satiate(emmalynn, madelle) -> Satiate(x, laetitia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The roxana is premium. The roxana remain the melonie. The georgy remain the roxana. The annalise is premium. The melonie is not superior. The melonie aluminize the roxana. The melonie remain the georgy. If someone remain the georgy then they visit the roxana. If someone remain the georgy and they do not need the melonie then the melonie cleanse the roxana. If someone cleanse the georgy then the georgy is nicaraguan. If someone aluminize the roxana and the roxana remain the melonie then they visit the annalise. If the melonie cleanse the georgy then the melonie is disclosed. If someone remain the annalise then the annalise cleanse the georgy. The roxana remain the roxana.", "logic": "\nPremium(roxana)\nRemain(roxana, melonie)\nRemain(georgy, roxana)\nPremium(annalise)\nnot Superior(melonie)\nAluminize(melonie, roxana)\nRemain(melonie, georgy)\nforall x (Remain(x, georgy) -> Remain(x, roxana))\nforall x (Remain(x, georgy) and not Aluminize(x, melonie) -> Cleanse(melonie, roxana))\nforall x (Cleanse(x, georgy) -> Nicaraguan(georgy))\nforall x (Aluminize(x, roxana) and Remain(roxana, melonie) -> Remain(x, annalise))\nCleanse(melonie, georgy) -> Disclosed(melonie)\nforall x (Remain(x, annalise) -> Cleanse(annalise, georgy))\n\nRemain(roxana, roxana)\n\nforall x (Remain(x, georgy) -> Remain(x, roxana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The rosella is dominating. The rosella abnegate the darwin. The bartlett abnegate the rosella. The florance is dominating. The darwin is not unswept. The darwin develop the rosella. The darwin abnegate the bartlett. If someone abnegate the bartlett then they visit the rosella. If someone abnegate the bartlett and they do not need the darwin then the darwin profile the rosella. If someone profile the bartlett then the bartlett is slubbed. If someone develop the rosella and the rosella abnegate the darwin then they visit the florance. If the darwin profile the bartlett then the darwin is virulent. If someone abnegate the florance then the florance profile the bartlett. The darwin is not virulent.", "logic": "\nDominating(rosella)\nAbnegate(rosella, darwin)\nAbnegate(bartlett, rosella)\nDominating(florance)\nnot Unswept(darwin)\nDevelop(darwin, rosella)\nAbnegate(darwin, bartlett)\nforall x (Abnegate(x, bartlett) -> Abnegate(x, rosella))\nforall x (Abnegate(x, bartlett) and not Develop(x, darwin) -> Profile(darwin, rosella))\nforall x (Profile(x, bartlett) -> Slubbed(bartlett))\nforall x (Develop(x, rosella) and Abnegate(rosella, darwin) -> Abnegate(x, florance))\nProfile(darwin, bartlett) -> Virulent(darwin)\nforall x (Abnegate(x, florance) -> Profile(florance, bartlett))\n\nnot Virulent(darwin)\n\nProfile(darwin, bartlett) -> Virulent(darwin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The quintin is sacculate. The quintin enplane the diana. The mechelle enplane the quintin. The mohan is sacculate. The diana is not outback. The diana message the quintin. The diana enplane the mechelle. If someone enplane the mechelle then they visit the quintin. If someone enplane the mechelle and they do not need the diana then the diana sadden the quintin. If someone sadden the mechelle then the mechelle is palpebrate. If someone message the quintin and the quintin enplane the diana then they visit the mohan. If the diana sadden the mechelle then the diana is cupular. If someone enplane the mohan then the mohan sadden the mechelle. The quintin enplane the mohan.", "logic": "\nSacculate(quintin)\nEnplane(quintin, diana)\nEnplane(mechelle, quintin)\nSacculate(mohan)\nnot Outback(diana)\nMessage(diana, quintin)\nEnplane(diana, mechelle)\nforall x (Enplane(x, mechelle) -> Enplane(x, quintin))\nforall x (Enplane(x, mechelle) and not Message(x, diana) -> Sadden(diana, quintin))\nforall x (Sadden(x, mechelle) -> Palpebrate(mechelle))\nforall x (Message(x, quintin) and Enplane(quintin, diana) -> Enplane(x, mohan))\nSadden(diana, mechelle) -> Cupular(diana)\nforall x (Enplane(x, mohan) -> Sadden(mohan, mechelle))\n\nEnplane(quintin, mohan)\n\nforall x (Message(x, quintin) and Enplane(quintin, diana) -> Enplane(x, mohan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The hewitt is overfull. The hewitt depict the amalie. The remy depict the hewitt. The faun is overfull. The amalie is not icky. The amalie deputize the hewitt. The amalie depict the remy. If someone depict the remy then they visit the hewitt. If someone depict the remy and they do not need the amalie then the amalie aquaplane the hewitt. If someone aquaplane the remy then the remy is befitting. If someone deputize the hewitt and the hewitt depict the amalie then they visit the faun. If the amalie aquaplane the remy then the amalie is transposed. If someone depict the faun then the faun aquaplane the remy. The hewitt does not need the remy.", "logic": "\nOverfull(hewitt)\nDepict(hewitt, amalie)\nDepict(remy, hewitt)\nOverfull(faun)\nnot Icky(amalie)\nDeputize(amalie, hewitt)\nDepict(amalie, remy)\nforall x (Depict(x, remy) -> Depict(x, hewitt))\nforall x (Depict(x, remy) and not Deputize(x, amalie) -> Aquaplane(amalie, hewitt))\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, remy) -> Befitting(remy))\nforall x (Deputize(x, hewitt) and Depict(hewitt, amalie) -> Depict(x, faun))\nAquaplane(amalie, remy) -> Transposed(amalie)\nforall x (Depict(x, faun) -> Aquaplane(faun, remy))\n\nnot Deputize(hewitt, remy)\n\nnot Deputize(hewitt, remy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The violante is bereaved. The violante advise the henderson. The olly advise the violante. The anson is bereaved. The henderson is not unheeded. The henderson scrape the violante. The henderson advise the olly. If someone advise the olly then they visit the violante. If someone advise the olly and they do not need the henderson then the henderson harbour the violante. If someone harbour the olly then the olly is antennary. If someone scrape the violante and the violante advise the henderson then they visit the anson. If the henderson harbour the olly then the henderson is satiny. If someone advise the anson then the anson harbour the olly. The henderson harbour the olly.", "logic": "\nBereaved(violante)\nAdvise(violante, henderson)\nAdvise(olly, violante)\nBereaved(anson)\nnot Unheeded(henderson)\nScrape(henderson, violante)\nAdvise(henderson, olly)\nforall x (Advise(x, olly) -> Advise(x, violante))\nforall x (Advise(x, olly) and not Scrape(x, henderson) -> Harbour(henderson, violante))\nforall x (Harbour(x, olly) -> Antennary(olly))\nforall x (Scrape(x, violante) and Advise(violante, henderson) -> Advise(x, anson))\nHarbour(henderson, olly) -> Satiny(henderson)\nforall x (Advise(x, anson) -> Harbour(anson, olly))\n\nHarbour(henderson, olly)\n\nHarbour(henderson, olly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The guillema is advisory. The guillema heap the vite. The vivyanne heap the guillema. The lemar is advisory. The vite is not cocky. The vite convolute the guillema. The vite heap the vivyanne. If someone heap the vivyanne then they visit the guillema. If someone heap the vivyanne and they do not need the vite then the vite savage the guillema. If someone savage the vivyanne then the vivyanne is bauxitic. If someone convolute the guillema and the guillema heap the vite then they visit the lemar. If the vite savage the vivyanne then the vite is sinuous. If someone heap the lemar then the lemar savage the vivyanne. The vivyanne is not sinuous.", "logic": "\nAdvisory(guillema)\nHeap(guillema, vite)\nHeap(vivyanne, guillema)\nAdvisory(lemar)\nnot Cocky(vite)\nConvolute(vite, guillema)\nHeap(vite, vivyanne)\nforall x (Heap(x, vivyanne) -> Heap(x, guillema))\nforall x (Heap(x, vivyanne) and not Convolute(x, vite) -> Savage(vite, guillema))\nforall x (Savage(x, vivyanne) -> Bauxitic(vivyanne))\nforall x (Convolute(x, guillema) and Heap(guillema, vite) -> Heap(x, lemar))\nSavage(vite, vivyanne) -> Sinuous(vite)\nforall x (Heap(x, lemar) -> Savage(lemar, vivyanne))\n\nnot Sinuous(vivyanne)\n\nnot Sinuous(vivyanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The clareta is winy. The clareta discommode the harv. The ericka discommode the clareta. The sybila is winy. The harv is not phenotypic. The harv confront the clareta. The harv discommode the ericka. If someone discommode the ericka then they visit the clareta. If someone discommode the ericka and they do not need the harv then the harv dispel the clareta. If someone dispel the ericka then the ericka is reverent. If someone confront the clareta and the clareta discommode the harv then they visit the sybila. If the harv dispel the ericka then the harv is stylised. If someone discommode the sybila then the sybila dispel the ericka. The clareta confront the clareta.", "logic": "\nWiny(clareta)\nDiscommode(clareta, harv)\nDiscommode(ericka, clareta)\nWiny(sybila)\nnot Phenotypic(harv)\nConfront(harv, clareta)\nDiscommode(harv, ericka)\nforall x (Discommode(x, ericka) -> Discommode(x, clareta))\nforall x (Discommode(x, ericka) and not Confront(x, harv) -> Dispel(harv, clareta))\nforall x (Dispel(x, ericka) -> Reverent(ericka))\nforall x (Confront(x, clareta) and Discommode(clareta, harv) -> Discommode(x, sybila))\nDispel(harv, ericka) -> Stylised(harv)\nforall x (Discommode(x, sybila) -> Dispel(sybila, ericka))\n\nConfront(clareta, clareta)\n\nConfront(clareta, clareta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "Ardyce is ovular. Levi is phonetic. Levi is gimbaled. Tyne is biaxal. Tyne is phonetic. Woodie is not biaxal. Woodie is phonetic. If something is dissuasive then it is mature. All gimbaled things are ovular. White things are dissuasive. All gimbaled, dissuasive things are not theistic. If Tyne is gimbaled and Tyne is not mature then Tyne is not phonetic. If something is ovular and not theistic then it is biaxal. Levi is phonetic.", "logic": "\nOvular(ardyce)\nPhonetic(levi)\nGimbaled(levi)\nBiaxal(tyne)\nPhonetic(tyne)\nnot Biaxal(woodie)\nPhonetic(woodie)\nforall x (Dissuasive(x) -> Mature(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) -> Dissuasive(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) and Dissuasive(x) -> not Theistic(x))\nGimbaled(tyne) and not Mature(tyne) -> not Phonetic(tyne)\nforall x (Ovular(x) and not Theistic(x) -> Biaxal(x))\n\nPhonetic(levi)\n\ntherefore Phonetic(levi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Marje is oscine. Orazio is unlogical. Orazio is saltlike. Caitlin is rootbound. Caitlin is unlogical. Orlando is not rootbound. Orlando is unlogical. If something is wayward then it is swelled. All saltlike things are oscine. White things are wayward. All saltlike, wayward things are not sunny. If Caitlin is saltlike and Caitlin is not swelled then Caitlin is not unlogical. If something is oscine and not sunny then it is rootbound. Orazio is not unlogical.", "logic": "\nOscine(marje)\nUnlogical(orazio)\nSaltlike(orazio)\nRootbound(caitlin)\nUnlogical(caitlin)\nnot Rootbound(orlando)\nUnlogical(orlando)\nforall x (Wayward(x) -> Swelled(x))\nforall x (Saltlike(x) -> Oscine(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Wayward(x))\nforall x (Saltlike(x) and Wayward(x) -> not Sunny(x))\nSaltlike(caitlin) and not Swelled(caitlin) -> not Unlogical(caitlin)\nforall x (Oscine(x) and not Sunny(x) -> Rootbound(x))\n\nnot Unlogical(orazio)\n\ntherefore Unlogical(orazio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Doti is unrevealed. Gael is lxxi. Gael is hypodermic. Teodoor is sissyish. Teodoor is lxxi. Robbie is not sissyish. Robbie is lxxi. If something is roseate then it is truculent. All hypodermic things are unrevealed. White things are roseate. All hypodermic, roseate things are not indurate. If Teodoor is hypodermic and Teodoor is not truculent then Teodoor is not lxxi. If something is unrevealed and not indurate then it is sissyish. Gael is unrevealed.", "logic": "\nUnrevealed(doti)\nLxxi(gael)\nHypodermic(gael)\nSissyish(teodoor)\nLxxi(teodoor)\nnot Sissyish(robbie)\nLxxi(robbie)\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Roseate(x))\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) and Roseate(x) -> not Indurate(x))\nHypodermic(teodoor) and not Truculent(teodoor) -> not Lxxi(teodoor)\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) and not Indurate(x) -> Sissyish(x))\n\nUnrevealed(gael)\n\nHypodermic(gael) and forall x (Hypodermic(x) -> Unrevealed(x)) -> therefore Unrevealed(gael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Terza is such. Gleda is accidental. Gleda is relieved. Shell is pierced. Shell is accidental. Tobey is not pierced. Tobey is accidental. If something is unethical then it is rumpled. All relieved things are such. White things are unethical. All relieved, unethical things are not compact. If Shell is relieved and Shell is not rumpled then Shell is not accidental. If something is such and not compact then it is pierced. Gleda is not such.", "logic": "\nSuch(terza)\nAccidental(gleda)\nRelieved(gleda)\nPierced(shell)\nAccidental(shell)\nnot Pierced(tobey)\nAccidental(tobey)\nforall x (Unethical(x) -> Rumpled(x))\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Such(x))\nforall x (Such(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Relieved(x) and Unethical(x) -> not Compact(x))\nRelieved(shell) and not Rumpled(shell) -> not Accidental(shell)\nforall x (Such(x) and not Compact(x) -> Pierced(x))\n\nnot Such(gleda)\n\nRelieved(gleda) and forall x (Relieved(x) -> Such(x)) -> therefore Such(gleda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Vitia is notifiable. Florella is credited. Florella is worthful. Hetty is crooked. Hetty is credited. Yetty is not crooked. Yetty is credited. If something is joyful then it is reptilian. All worthful things are notifiable. White things are joyful. All worthful, joyful things are not pluperfect. If Hetty is worthful and Hetty is not reptilian then Hetty is not credited. If something is notifiable and not pluperfect then it is crooked. Florella is joyful.", "logic": "\nNotifiable(vitia)\nCredited(florella)\nWorthful(florella)\nCrooked(hetty)\nCredited(hetty)\nnot Crooked(yetty)\nCredited(yetty)\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> Notifiable(x))\nforall x (Notifiable(x) -> Joyful(x))\nforall x (Worthful(x) and Joyful(x) -> not Pluperfect(x))\nWorthful(hetty) and not Reptilian(hetty) -> not Credited(hetty)\nforall x (Notifiable(x) and not Pluperfect(x) -> Crooked(x))\n\nJoyful(florella)\n\nWorthful(florella) and forall x (Worthful(x) -> Notifiable(x)) -> therefore Notifiable(florella) Notifiable(florella) and forall x (Notifiable(x) -> Joyful(x)) -> therefore Joyful(florella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Georg is getatable. Helena is marmoreal. Helena is sinful. Flossy is enlarged. Flossy is marmoreal. Ronna is not enlarged. Ronna is marmoreal. If something is ignitable then it is braw. All sinful things are getatable. White things are ignitable. All sinful, ignitable things are not couthy. If Flossy is sinful and Flossy is not braw then Flossy is not marmoreal. If something is getatable and not couthy then it is enlarged. Helena is not ignitable.", "logic": "\nGetatable(georg)\nMarmoreal(helena)\nSinful(helena)\nEnlarged(flossy)\nMarmoreal(flossy)\nnot Enlarged(ronna)\nMarmoreal(ronna)\nforall x (Ignitable(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Sinful(x) -> Getatable(x))\nforall x (Getatable(x) -> Ignitable(x))\nforall x (Sinful(x) and Ignitable(x) -> not Couthy(x))\nSinful(flossy) and not Braw(flossy) -> not Marmoreal(flossy)\nforall x (Getatable(x) and not Couthy(x) -> Enlarged(x))\n\nnot Ignitable(helena)\n\nSinful(helena) and forall x (Sinful(x) -> Getatable(x)) -> therefore Getatable(helena) Getatable(helena) and forall x (Getatable(x) -> Ignitable(x)) -> therefore Ignitable(helena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Vanny is avuncular. Edith is riparian. Edith is sozzled. Kermit is contrary. Kermit is riparian. Noell is not contrary. Noell is riparian. If something is perfidious then it is fine. All sozzled things are avuncular. White things are perfidious. All sozzled, perfidious things are not worthless. If Kermit is sozzled and Kermit is not fine then Kermit is not riparian. If something is avuncular and not worthless then it is contrary. Edith is not worthless.", "logic": "\nAvuncular(vanny)\nRiparian(edith)\nSozzled(edith)\nContrary(kermit)\nRiparian(kermit)\nnot Contrary(noell)\nRiparian(noell)\nforall x (Perfidious(x) -> Fine(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Perfidious(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) and Perfidious(x) -> not Worthless(x))\nSozzled(kermit) and not Fine(kermit) -> not Riparian(kermit)\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and not Worthless(x) -> Contrary(x))\n\nnot Worthless(edith)\n\nSozzled(edith) and forall x (Sozzled(x) -> Avuncular(x)) -> therefore Avuncular(edith) Avuncular(edith) and forall x (Avuncular(x) -> Perfidious(x)) -> therefore Perfidious(edith) Sozzled(edith) and Perfidious(edith) and forall x (Sozzled(x) and Perfidious(x) -> not Worthless(x)) -> therefore not Worthless(edith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Thomasina is manifest. Waneta is tined. Waneta is robotlike. Friedric is edgy. Friedric is tined. Dyana is not edgy. Dyana is tined. If something is scrimy then it is cuprous. All robotlike things are manifest. White things are scrimy. All robotlike, scrimy things are not tyrolean. If Friedric is robotlike and Friedric is not cuprous then Friedric is not tined. If something is manifest and not tyrolean then it is edgy. Waneta is tyrolean.", "logic": "\nManifest(thomasina)\nTined(waneta)\nRobotlike(waneta)\nEdgy(friedric)\nTined(friedric)\nnot Edgy(dyana)\nTined(dyana)\nforall x (Scrimy(x) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Robotlike(x) and Scrimy(x) -> not Tyrolean(x))\nRobotlike(friedric) and not Cuprous(friedric) -> not Tined(friedric)\nforall x (Manifest(x) and not Tyrolean(x) -> Edgy(x))\n\nTyrolean(waneta)\n\nRobotlike(waneta) and forall x (Robotlike(x) -> Manifest(x)) -> therefore Manifest(waneta) Manifest(waneta) and forall x (Manifest(x) -> Scrimy(x)) -> therefore Scrimy(waneta) Robotlike(waneta) and Scrimy(waneta) and forall x (Robotlike(x) and Scrimy(x) -> not Tyrolean(x)) -> therefore not Tyrolean(waneta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Felita is temporary. Gilda is amoristic. Gilda is regardant. Manny is nostalgic. Manny is amoristic. Nevins is not nostalgic. Nevins is amoristic. If something is omnibus then it is argive. All regardant things are temporary. White things are omnibus. All regardant, omnibus things are not stearic. If Manny is regardant and Manny is not argive then Manny is not amoristic. If something is temporary and not stearic then it is nostalgic. Felita is not nostalgic.", "logic": "\nTemporary(felita)\nAmoristic(gilda)\nRegardant(gilda)\nNostalgic(manny)\nAmoristic(manny)\nnot Nostalgic(nevins)\nAmoristic(nevins)\nforall x (Omnibus(x) -> Argive(x))\nforall x (Regardant(x) -> Temporary(x))\nforall x (Temporary(x) -> Omnibus(x))\nforall x (Regardant(x) and Omnibus(x) -> not Stearic(x))\nRegardant(manny) and not Argive(manny) -> not Amoristic(manny)\nforall x (Temporary(x) and not Stearic(x) -> Nostalgic(x))\n\nnot Nostalgic(felita)\n\nforall x (Temporary(x) and not Stearic(x) -> Nostalgic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Suzetta is faltering. Caresse is extropic. Caresse is wheezy. Zack is fatheaded. Zack is extropic. Jazmin is not fatheaded. Jazmin is extropic. If something is unkindled then it is entangled. All wheezy things are faltering. White things are unkindled. All wheezy, unkindled things are not abroad. If Zack is wheezy and Zack is not entangled then Zack is not extropic. If something is faltering and not abroad then it is fatheaded. Jazmin is unkindled.", "logic": "\nFaltering(suzetta)\nExtropic(caresse)\nWheezy(caresse)\nFatheaded(zack)\nExtropic(zack)\nnot Fatheaded(jazmin)\nExtropic(jazmin)\nforall x (Unkindled(x) -> Entangled(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Faltering(x))\nforall x (Faltering(x) -> Unkindled(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) and Unkindled(x) -> not Abroad(x))\nWheezy(zack) and not Entangled(zack) -> not Extropic(zack)\nforall x (Faltering(x) and not Abroad(x) -> Fatheaded(x))\n\nUnkindled(jazmin)\n\nforall x (Faltering(x) -> Unkindled(x)) <- forall x (Wheezy(x) -> Faltering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Mae is aimless. Tobe is tubal. Tobe is jaded. Alison is inaudible. Alison is tubal. Bernd is not inaudible. Bernd is tubal. If something is accessory then it is standpat. All jaded things are aimless. White things are accessory. All jaded, accessory things are not hotheaded. If Alison is jaded and Alison is not standpat then Alison is not tubal. If something is aimless and not hotheaded then it is inaudible. Bernd is not aimless.", "logic": "\nAimless(mae)\nTubal(tobe)\nJaded(tobe)\nInaudible(alison)\nTubal(alison)\nnot Inaudible(bernd)\nTubal(bernd)\nforall x (Accessory(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) -> Aimless(x))\nforall x (Aimless(x) -> Accessory(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) and Accessory(x) -> not Hotheaded(x))\nJaded(alison) and not Standpat(alison) -> not Tubal(alison)\nforall x (Aimless(x) and not Hotheaded(x) -> Inaudible(x))\n\nnot Aimless(bernd)\n\nforall x (Jaded(x) -> Aimless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Gerard is rimless. Ira is radiating. Ira is carboxylic. Tomkin is urogenital. Tomkin is radiating. Carlin is not urogenital. Carlin is radiating. If something is durable then it is forged. All carboxylic things are rimless. White things are durable. All carboxylic, durable things are not corvine. If Tomkin is carboxylic and Tomkin is not forged then Tomkin is not radiating. If something is rimless and not corvine then it is urogenital. Tomkin is forged.", "logic": "\nRimless(gerard)\nRadiating(ira)\nCarboxylic(ira)\nUrogenital(tomkin)\nRadiating(tomkin)\nnot Urogenital(carlin)\nRadiating(carlin)\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Forged(x))\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) -> Rimless(x))\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> Durable(x))\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) and Durable(x) -> not Corvine(x))\nCarboxylic(tomkin) and not Forged(tomkin) -> not Radiating(tomkin)\nforall x (Rimless(x) and not Corvine(x) -> Urogenital(x))\n\nForged(tomkin)\n\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Forged(x)) <- forall x (Rimless(x) -> Durable(x)) <- forall x (Carboxylic(x) -> Rimless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Weston is normative. Roselyn is rotary. Roselyn is nosohusial. Vivianne is outflowing. Vivianne is rotary. Park is not outflowing. Park is rotary. If something is embolic then it is immature. All nosohusial things are normative. White things are embolic. All nosohusial, embolic things are not baboonish. If Vivianne is nosohusial and Vivianne is not immature then Vivianne is not rotary. If something is normative and not baboonish then it is outflowing. Vivianne is not baboonish.", "logic": "\nNormative(weston)\nRotary(roselyn)\nNosohusial(roselyn)\nOutflowing(vivianne)\nRotary(vivianne)\nnot Outflowing(park)\nRotary(park)\nforall x (Embolic(x) -> Immature(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> Normative(x))\nforall x (Normative(x) -> Embolic(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) and Embolic(x) -> not Baboonish(x))\nNosohusial(vivianne) and not Immature(vivianne) -> not Rotary(vivianne)\nforall x (Normative(x) and not Baboonish(x) -> Outflowing(x))\n\nnot Baboonish(vivianne)\n\nnot Baboonish(vivianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Dwain is mucky. Lemmie is dominating. Lemmie is impeccant. Reena is xciii. Reena is dominating. Dotty is not xciii. Dotty is dominating. If something is amoeboid then it is subsidized. All impeccant things are mucky. White things are amoeboid. All impeccant, amoeboid things are not true. If Reena is impeccant and Reena is not subsidized then Reena is not dominating. If something is mucky and not true then it is xciii. Dwain is impeccant.", "logic": "\nMucky(dwain)\nDominating(lemmie)\nImpeccant(lemmie)\nXciii(reena)\nDominating(reena)\nnot Xciii(dotty)\nDominating(dotty)\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Impeccant(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Mucky(x) -> Amoeboid(x))\nforall x (Impeccant(x) and Amoeboid(x) -> not True(x))\nImpeccant(reena) and not Subsidized(reena) -> not Dominating(reena)\nforall x (Mucky(x) and not True(x) -> Xciii(x))\n\nImpeccant(dwain)\n\nImpeccant(dwain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Brea is froward. Tess is predacious. Tess is rattled. Maryellen is bipolar. Maryellen is predacious. Caesar is not bipolar. Caesar is predacious. If something is effusive then it is congealed. All rattled things are froward. White things are effusive. All rattled, effusive things are not peripheral. If Maryellen is rattled and Maryellen is not congealed then Maryellen is not predacious. If something is froward and not peripheral then it is bipolar. Caesar is not peripheral.", "logic": "\nFroward(brea)\nPredacious(tess)\nRattled(tess)\nBipolar(maryellen)\nPredacious(maryellen)\nnot Bipolar(caesar)\nPredacious(caesar)\nforall x (Effusive(x) -> Congealed(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Froward(x))\nforall x (Froward(x) -> Effusive(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) and Effusive(x) -> not Peripheral(x))\nRattled(maryellen) and not Congealed(maryellen) -> not Predacious(maryellen)\nforall x (Froward(x) and not Peripheral(x) -> Bipolar(x))\n\nnot Peripheral(caesar)\n\nnot Peripheral(caesar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Meryl is ribald. Martita is final. Martita is frangible. Maye is bellicose. Maye is final. Caron is not bellicose. Caron is final. If something is seamy then it is labiate. All frangible things are ribald. White things are seamy. All frangible, seamy things are not frantic. If Maye is frangible and Maye is not labiate then Maye is not final. If something is ribald and not frantic then it is bellicose. Meryl is final.", "logic": "\nRibald(meryl)\nFinal(martita)\nFrangible(martita)\nBellicose(maye)\nFinal(maye)\nnot Bellicose(caron)\nFinal(caron)\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> Labiate(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Ribald(x))\nforall x (Ribald(x) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) and Seamy(x) -> not Frantic(x))\nFrangible(maye) and not Labiate(maye) -> not Final(maye)\nforall x (Ribald(x) and not Frantic(x) -> Bellicose(x))\n\nFinal(meryl)\n\nFinal(meryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The terry jollify the lorelle. The lorelle is bouncing. The karolina devilise the cassey. The cassey jollify the lorelle. If someone tumble the karolina then the karolina is bouncing. If someone jollify the karolina and they eat the cassey then the karolina tumble the lorelle. If someone is bouncing then they eat the karolina. If someone jollify the cassey then the cassey devilise the terry. If someone jollify the terry then the terry jollify the karolina. If someone jollify the terry then they see the terry. The cassey jollify the lorelle.", "logic": "\nJollify(terry, lorelle)\nBouncing(lorelle)\nDevilise(karolina, cassey)\nJollify(cassey, lorelle)\nforall x (Tumble(x, karolina) -> Bouncing(karolina))\nforall x (Jollify(x, karolina) and Tumble(x, cassey) -> Tumble(karolina, lorelle))\nforall x (Bouncing(x) -> Tumble(x, karolina))\nforall x (Jollify(x, cassey) -> Devilise(cassey, terry))\nforall x (Jollify(x, terry) -> Jollify(terry, karolina))\nforall x (Jollify(x, terry) -> Devilise(x, terry))\n\nJollify(cassey, lorelle)\n\ntherefore Jollify(cassey, lorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The jillane reticulate the rosanna. The rosanna is monogynic. The skipton tinker the josefa. The josefa reticulate the rosanna. If someone entertain the skipton then the skipton is monogynic. If someone reticulate the skipton and they eat the josefa then the skipton entertain the rosanna. If someone is monogynic then they eat the skipton. If someone reticulate the josefa then the josefa tinker the jillane. If someone reticulate the jillane then the jillane reticulate the skipton. If someone reticulate the jillane then they see the jillane. The rosanna is not monogynic.", "logic": "\nReticulate(jillane, rosanna)\nMonogynic(rosanna)\nTinker(skipton, josefa)\nReticulate(josefa, rosanna)\nforall x (Entertain(x, skipton) -> Monogynic(skipton))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, skipton) and Entertain(x, josefa) -> Entertain(skipton, rosanna))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) -> Entertain(x, skipton))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, josefa) -> Tinker(josefa, jillane))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, jillane) -> Reticulate(jillane, skipton))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, jillane) -> Tinker(x, jillane))\n\nnot Monogynic(rosanna)\n\ntherefore Monogynic(rosanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The hildy rubricate the juliette. The juliette is invaluable. The alyson understate the bjorne. The bjorne rubricate the juliette. If someone enrobe the alyson then the alyson is invaluable. If someone rubricate the alyson and they eat the bjorne then the alyson enrobe the juliette. If someone is invaluable then they eat the alyson. If someone rubricate the bjorne then the bjorne understate the hildy. If someone rubricate the hildy then the hildy rubricate the alyson. If someone rubricate the hildy then they see the hildy. The juliette enrobe the alyson.", "logic": "\nRubricate(hildy, juliette)\nInvaluable(juliette)\nUnderstate(alyson, bjorne)\nRubricate(bjorne, juliette)\nforall x (Enrobe(x, alyson) -> Invaluable(alyson))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, alyson) and Enrobe(x, bjorne) -> Enrobe(alyson, juliette))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Enrobe(x, alyson))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, bjorne) -> Understate(bjorne, hildy))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, hildy) -> Rubricate(hildy, alyson))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, hildy) -> Understate(x, hildy))\n\nEnrobe(juliette, alyson)\n\nInvaluable(juliette) and forall x (Invaluable(x) -> Enrobe(x, alyson)) -> therefore Enrobe(juliette, alyson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The marlyn transect the kayley. The kayley is prevalent. The tiffy grizzle the dorolice. The dorolice transect the kayley. If someone misspend the tiffy then the tiffy is prevalent. If someone transect the tiffy and they eat the dorolice then the tiffy misspend the kayley. If someone is prevalent then they eat the tiffy. If someone transect the dorolice then the dorolice grizzle the marlyn. If someone transect the marlyn then the marlyn transect the tiffy. If someone transect the marlyn then they see the marlyn. The kayley does not eat the tiffy.", "logic": "\nTransect(marlyn, kayley)\nPrevalent(kayley)\nGrizzle(tiffy, dorolice)\nTransect(dorolice, kayley)\nforall x (Misspend(x, tiffy) -> Prevalent(tiffy))\nforall x (Transect(x, tiffy) and Misspend(x, dorolice) -> Misspend(tiffy, kayley))\nforall x (Prevalent(x) -> Misspend(x, tiffy))\nforall x (Transect(x, dorolice) -> Grizzle(dorolice, marlyn))\nforall x (Transect(x, marlyn) -> Transect(marlyn, tiffy))\nforall x (Transect(x, marlyn) -> Grizzle(x, marlyn))\n\nnot Misspend(kayley, tiffy)\n\nPrevalent(kayley) and forall x (Prevalent(x) -> Misspend(x, tiffy)) -> therefore Misspend(kayley, tiffy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The curtis precook the margaret. The margaret is omani. The joanna covenant the shaylynn. The shaylynn precook the margaret. If someone chuff the joanna then the joanna is omani. If someone precook the joanna and they eat the shaylynn then the joanna chuff the margaret. If someone is omani then they eat the joanna. If someone precook the shaylynn then the shaylynn covenant the curtis. If someone precook the curtis then the curtis precook the joanna. If someone precook the curtis then they see the curtis. The joanna is omani.", "logic": "\nPrecook(curtis, margaret)\nOmani(margaret)\nCovenant(joanna, shaylynn)\nPrecook(shaylynn, margaret)\nforall x (Chuff(x, joanna) -> Omani(joanna))\nforall x (Precook(x, joanna) and Chuff(x, shaylynn) -> Chuff(joanna, margaret))\nforall x (Omani(x) -> Chuff(x, joanna))\nforall x (Precook(x, shaylynn) -> Covenant(shaylynn, curtis))\nforall x (Precook(x, curtis) -> Precook(curtis, joanna))\nforall x (Precook(x, curtis) -> Covenant(x, curtis))\n\nOmani(joanna)\n\nOmani(margaret) and forall x (Omani(x) -> Chuff(x, joanna)) -> therefore Chuff(margaret, joanna) Chuff(margaret, joanna) and forall x (Chuff(x, joanna) -> Omani(joanna)) -> therefore Omani(joanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The aeriela manifold the glennis. The glennis is african. The clive chatter the jocelyn. The jocelyn manifold the glennis. If someone concretise the clive then the clive is african. If someone manifold the clive and they eat the jocelyn then the clive concretise the glennis. If someone is african then they eat the clive. If someone manifold the jocelyn then the jocelyn chatter the aeriela. If someone manifold the aeriela then the aeriela manifold the clive. If someone manifold the aeriela then they see the aeriela. The clive is not african.", "logic": "\nManifold(aeriela, glennis)\nAfrican(glennis)\nChatter(clive, jocelyn)\nManifold(jocelyn, glennis)\nforall x (Concretise(x, clive) -> African(clive))\nforall x (Manifold(x, clive) and Concretise(x, jocelyn) -> Concretise(clive, glennis))\nforall x (African(x) -> Concretise(x, clive))\nforall x (Manifold(x, jocelyn) -> Chatter(jocelyn, aeriela))\nforall x (Manifold(x, aeriela) -> Manifold(aeriela, clive))\nforall x (Manifold(x, aeriela) -> Chatter(x, aeriela))\n\nnot African(clive)\n\nAfrican(glennis) and forall x (African(x) -> Concretise(x, clive)) -> therefore Concretise(glennis, clive) Concretise(glennis, clive) and forall x (Concretise(x, clive) -> African(clive)) -> therefore African(clive)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The roderigo shred the rosalinda. The rosalinda is blushing. The niall cage the koralle. The koralle shred the rosalinda. If someone clothe the niall then the niall is blushing. If someone shred the niall and they eat the koralle then the niall clothe the rosalinda. If someone is blushing then they eat the niall. If someone shred the koralle then the koralle cage the roderigo. If someone shred the roderigo then the roderigo shred the niall. If someone shred the roderigo then they see the roderigo. The niall clothe the niall.", "logic": "\nShred(roderigo, rosalinda)\nBlushing(rosalinda)\nCage(niall, koralle)\nShred(koralle, rosalinda)\nforall x (Clothe(x, niall) -> Blushing(niall))\nforall x (Shred(x, niall) and Clothe(x, koralle) -> Clothe(niall, rosalinda))\nforall x (Blushing(x) -> Clothe(x, niall))\nforall x (Shred(x, koralle) -> Cage(koralle, roderigo))\nforall x (Shred(x, roderigo) -> Shred(roderigo, niall))\nforall x (Shred(x, roderigo) -> Cage(x, roderigo))\n\nClothe(niall, niall)\n\nBlushing(rosalinda) and forall x (Blushing(x) -> Clothe(x, niall)) -> therefore Clothe(rosalinda, niall) Clothe(rosalinda, niall) and forall x (Clothe(x, niall) -> Blushing(niall)) -> therefore Blushing(niall) Blushing(niall) and forall x (Blushing(x) -> Clothe(x, niall)) -> therefore Clothe(niall, niall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The rabi wait the kori. The kori is untethered. The valery disembark the maegan. The maegan wait the kori. If someone patinate the valery then the valery is untethered. If someone wait the valery and they eat the maegan then the valery patinate the kori. If someone is untethered then they eat the valery. If someone wait the maegan then the maegan disembark the rabi. If someone wait the rabi then the rabi wait the valery. If someone wait the rabi then they see the rabi. The valery does not eat the valery.", "logic": "\nWait(rabi, kori)\nUntethered(kori)\nDisembark(valery, maegan)\nWait(maegan, kori)\nforall x (Patinate(x, valery) -> Untethered(valery))\nforall x (Wait(x, valery) and Patinate(x, maegan) -> Patinate(valery, kori))\nforall x (Untethered(x) -> Patinate(x, valery))\nforall x (Wait(x, maegan) -> Disembark(maegan, rabi))\nforall x (Wait(x, rabi) -> Wait(rabi, valery))\nforall x (Wait(x, rabi) -> Disembark(x, rabi))\n\nnot Patinate(valery, valery)\n\nUntethered(kori) and forall x (Untethered(x) -> Patinate(x, valery)) -> therefore Patinate(kori, valery) Patinate(kori, valery) and forall x (Patinate(x, valery) -> Untethered(valery)) -> therefore Untethered(valery) Untethered(valery) and forall x (Untethered(x) -> Patinate(x, valery)) -> therefore Patinate(valery, valery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The margret palliate the pierce. The pierce is severe. The cynthy mottle the cami. The cami palliate the pierce. If someone colour the cynthy then the cynthy is severe. If someone palliate the cynthy and they eat the cami then the cynthy colour the pierce. If someone is severe then they eat the cynthy. If someone palliate the cami then the cami mottle the margret. If someone palliate the margret then the margret palliate the cynthy. If someone palliate the margret then they see the margret. The cami does not see the margret.", "logic": "\nPalliate(margret, pierce)\nSevere(pierce)\nMottle(cynthy, cami)\nPalliate(cami, pierce)\nforall x (Colour(x, cynthy) -> Severe(cynthy))\nforall x (Palliate(x, cynthy) and Colour(x, cami) -> Colour(cynthy, pierce))\nforall x (Severe(x) -> Colour(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Palliate(x, cami) -> Mottle(cami, margret))\nforall x (Palliate(x, margret) -> Palliate(margret, cynthy))\nforall x (Palliate(x, margret) -> Mottle(x, margret))\n\nnot Mottle(cami, margret)\n\nforall x (Palliate(x, cami) -> Mottle(cami, margret)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The adriena squelch the ron. The ron is gradable. The denys reverse the trent. The trent squelch the ron. If someone elapse the denys then the denys is gradable. If someone squelch the denys and they eat the trent then the denys elapse the ron. If someone is gradable then they eat the denys. If someone squelch the trent then the trent reverse the adriena. If someone squelch the adriena then the adriena squelch the denys. If someone squelch the adriena then they see the adriena. The ron reverse the adriena.", "logic": "\nSquelch(adriena, ron)\nGradable(ron)\nReverse(denys, trent)\nSquelch(trent, ron)\nforall x (Elapse(x, denys) -> Gradable(denys))\nforall x (Squelch(x, denys) and Elapse(x, trent) -> Elapse(denys, ron))\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Elapse(x, denys))\nforall x (Squelch(x, trent) -> Reverse(trent, adriena))\nforall x (Squelch(x, adriena) -> Squelch(adriena, denys))\nforall x (Squelch(x, adriena) -> Reverse(x, adriena))\n\nReverse(ron, adriena)\n\nforall x (Squelch(x, adriena) -> Reverse(x, adriena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The chariot excogitate the karita. The karita is protected. The nanci fleet the sergeant. The sergeant excogitate the karita. If someone hire the nanci then the nanci is protected. If someone excogitate the nanci and they eat the sergeant then the nanci hire the karita. If someone is protected then they eat the nanci. If someone excogitate the sergeant then the sergeant fleet the chariot. If someone excogitate the chariot then the chariot excogitate the nanci. If someone excogitate the chariot then they see the chariot. The chariot does not need the nanci.", "logic": "\nExcogitate(chariot, karita)\nProtected(karita)\nFleet(nanci, sergeant)\nExcogitate(sergeant, karita)\nforall x (Hire(x, nanci) -> Protected(nanci))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, nanci) and Hire(x, sergeant) -> Hire(nanci, karita))\nforall x (Protected(x) -> Hire(x, nanci))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, sergeant) -> Fleet(sergeant, chariot))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, chariot) -> Excogitate(chariot, nanci))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, chariot) -> Fleet(x, chariot))\n\nnot Excogitate(chariot, nanci)\n\nforall x (Excogitate(x, chariot) -> Excogitate(chariot, nanci)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The robena crayon the donni. The donni is immaterial. The forbes blackwash the higgins. The higgins crayon the donni. If someone broil the forbes then the forbes is immaterial. If someone crayon the forbes and they eat the higgins then the forbes broil the donni. If someone is immaterial then they eat the forbes. If someone crayon the higgins then the higgins blackwash the robena. If someone crayon the robena then the robena crayon the forbes. If someone crayon the robena then they see the robena. The robena broil the forbes.", "logic": "\nCrayon(robena, donni)\nImmaterial(donni)\nBlackwash(forbes, higgins)\nCrayon(higgins, donni)\nforall x (Broil(x, forbes) -> Immaterial(forbes))\nforall x (Crayon(x, forbes) and Broil(x, higgins) -> Broil(forbes, donni))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Broil(x, forbes))\nforall x (Crayon(x, higgins) -> Blackwash(higgins, robena))\nforall x (Crayon(x, robena) -> Crayon(robena, forbes))\nforall x (Crayon(x, robena) -> Blackwash(x, robena))\n\nBroil(robena, forbes)\n\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Broil(x, forbes)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The quent chronicle the orelle. The orelle is sedative. The felicity glissade the elbertine. The elbertine chronicle the orelle. If someone breathe the felicity then the felicity is sedative. If someone chronicle the felicity and they eat the elbertine then the felicity breathe the orelle. If someone is sedative then they eat the felicity. If someone chronicle the elbertine then the elbertine glissade the quent. If someone chronicle the quent then the quent chronicle the felicity. If someone chronicle the quent then they see the quent. The quent is not red.", "logic": "\nChronicle(quent, orelle)\nSedative(orelle)\nGlissade(felicity, elbertine)\nChronicle(elbertine, orelle)\nforall x (Breathe(x, felicity) -> Sedative(felicity))\nforall x (Chronicle(x, felicity) and Breathe(x, elbertine) -> Breathe(felicity, orelle))\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Breathe(x, felicity))\nforall x (Chronicle(x, elbertine) -> Glissade(elbertine, quent))\nforall x (Chronicle(x, quent) -> Chronicle(quent, felicity))\nforall x (Chronicle(x, quent) -> Glissade(x, quent))\n\nnot Red(quent)\n\nnot Red(quent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The mona abbreviate the nadeen. The nadeen is outback. The norma encrust the karie. The karie abbreviate the nadeen. If someone imagine the norma then the norma is outback. If someone abbreviate the norma and they eat the karie then the norma imagine the nadeen. If someone is outback then they eat the norma. If someone abbreviate the karie then the karie encrust the mona. If someone abbreviate the mona then the mona abbreviate the norma. If someone abbreviate the mona then they see the mona. The norma encrust the norma.", "logic": "\nAbbreviate(mona, nadeen)\nOutback(nadeen)\nEncrust(norma, karie)\nAbbreviate(karie, nadeen)\nforall x (Imagine(x, norma) -> Outback(norma))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, norma) and Imagine(x, karie) -> Imagine(norma, nadeen))\nforall x (Outback(x) -> Imagine(x, norma))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, karie) -> Encrust(karie, mona))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, mona) -> Abbreviate(mona, norma))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, mona) -> Encrust(x, mona))\n\nEncrust(norma, norma)\n\nEncrust(norma, norma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The gavin shaft the aigneis. The aigneis is slow. The tomi license the janifer. The janifer shaft the aigneis. If someone slouch the tomi then the tomi is slow. If someone shaft the tomi and they eat the janifer then the tomi slouch the aigneis. If someone is slow then they eat the tomi. If someone shaft the janifer then the janifer license the gavin. If someone shaft the gavin then the gavin shaft the tomi. If someone shaft the gavin then they see the gavin. The tomi does not eat the janifer.", "logic": "\nShaft(gavin, aigneis)\nSlow(aigneis)\nLicense(tomi, janifer)\nShaft(janifer, aigneis)\nforall x (Slouch(x, tomi) -> Slow(tomi))\nforall x (Shaft(x, tomi) and Slouch(x, janifer) -> Slouch(tomi, aigneis))\nforall x (Slow(x) -> Slouch(x, tomi))\nforall x (Shaft(x, janifer) -> License(janifer, gavin))\nforall x (Shaft(x, gavin) -> Shaft(gavin, tomi))\nforall x (Shaft(x, gavin) -> License(x, gavin))\n\nnot Slouch(tomi, janifer)\n\nnot Slouch(tomi, janifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The melonie torch the arnoldo. The arnoldo is tiring. The torrance patinize the shanon. The shanon torch the arnoldo. If someone canonize the torrance then the torrance is tiring. If someone torch the torrance and they eat the shanon then the torrance canonize the arnoldo. If someone is tiring then they eat the torrance. If someone torch the shanon then the shanon patinize the melonie. If someone torch the melonie then the melonie torch the torrance. If someone torch the melonie then they see the melonie. The torrance is red.", "logic": "\nTorch(melonie, arnoldo)\nTiring(arnoldo)\nPatinize(torrance, shanon)\nTorch(shanon, arnoldo)\nforall x (Canonize(x, torrance) -> Tiring(torrance))\nforall x (Torch(x, torrance) and Canonize(x, shanon) -> Canonize(torrance, arnoldo))\nforall x (Tiring(x) -> Canonize(x, torrance))\nforall x (Torch(x, shanon) -> Patinize(shanon, melonie))\nforall x (Torch(x, melonie) -> Torch(melonie, torrance))\nforall x (Torch(x, melonie) -> Patinize(x, melonie))\n\nRed(torrance)\n\nRed(torrance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "Flossy is ramose. Flossy is unmelted. Flossy is biddable. Flossy is brinded. Alonzo is wainscoted. Alonzo is topologic. Alonzo is brinded. Kara is topologic. Kara is ramose. Deanna is wainscoted. Deanna is quavering. Deanna is topologic. Deanna is ramose. Deanna is unmelted. Deanna is biddable. Deanna is brinded. All wainscoted, topologic things are brinded. Red, brinded things are wainscoted. All ramose, wainscoted things are unmelted. All wainscoted things are quavering. All topologic things are quavering. If something is quavering then it is wainscoted. Deanna is unmelted.", "logic": "\nRamose(flossy)\nUnmelted(flossy)\nBiddable(flossy)\nBrinded(flossy)\nWainscoted(alonzo)\nTopologic(alonzo)\nBrinded(alonzo)\nTopologic(kara)\nRamose(kara)\nWainscoted(deanna)\nQuavering(deanna)\nTopologic(deanna)\nRamose(deanna)\nUnmelted(deanna)\nBiddable(deanna)\nBrinded(deanna)\nforall x (Wainscoted(x) and Topologic(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Ramose(x) and Brinded(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Ramose(x) and Wainscoted(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Wainscoted(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Topologic(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Quavering(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\n\nUnmelted(deanna)\n\ntherefore Unmelted(deanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Loraine is monatomic. Loraine is needy. Loraine is bowed. Loraine is normative. Shumeet is sumatran. Shumeet is fourfold. Shumeet is normative. Netti is fourfold. Netti is monatomic. Connor is sumatran. Connor is touristy. Connor is fourfold. Connor is monatomic. Connor is needy. Connor is bowed. Connor is normative. All sumatran, fourfold things are normative. Red, normative things are sumatran. All monatomic, sumatran things are needy. All sumatran things are touristy. All fourfold things are touristy. If something is touristy then it is sumatran. Connor is not monatomic.", "logic": "\nMonatomic(loraine)\nNeedy(loraine)\nBowed(loraine)\nNormative(loraine)\nSumatran(shumeet)\nFourfold(shumeet)\nNormative(shumeet)\nFourfold(netti)\nMonatomic(netti)\nSumatran(connor)\nTouristy(connor)\nFourfold(connor)\nMonatomic(connor)\nNeedy(connor)\nBowed(connor)\nNormative(connor)\nforall x (Sumatran(x) and Fourfold(x) -> Normative(x))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Normative(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Sumatran(x) -> Needy(x))\nforall x (Sumatran(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Fourfold(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Touristy(x) -> Sumatran(x))\n\nnot Monatomic(connor)\n\ntherefore Monatomic(connor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Keriann is sleepy. Keriann is unfailing. Keriann is direful. Keriann is booked. Iormina is beninese. Iormina is dilettante. Iormina is booked. Carena is dilettante. Carena is sleepy. Violet is beninese. Violet is methodical. Violet is dilettante. Violet is sleepy. Violet is unfailing. Violet is direful. Violet is booked. All beninese, dilettante things are booked. Red, booked things are beninese. All sleepy, beninese things are unfailing. All beninese things are methodical. All dilettante things are methodical. If something is methodical then it is beninese. Carena is methodical.", "logic": "\nSleepy(keriann)\nUnfailing(keriann)\nDireful(keriann)\nBooked(keriann)\nBeninese(iormina)\nDilettante(iormina)\nBooked(iormina)\nDilettante(carena)\nSleepy(carena)\nBeninese(violet)\nMethodical(violet)\nDilettante(violet)\nSleepy(violet)\nUnfailing(violet)\nDireful(violet)\nBooked(violet)\nforall x (Beninese(x) and Dilettante(x) -> Booked(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Booked(x) -> Beninese(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Beninese(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nforall x (Beninese(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Beninese(x))\n\nMethodical(carena)\n\nDilettante(carena) and forall x (Dilettante(x) -> Methodical(x)) -> therefore Methodical(carena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Amy is coquettish. Amy is pyaemic. Amy is ergodic. Amy is hollow. Grethel is stalinist. Grethel is unbrushed. Grethel is hollow. Lorry is unbrushed. Lorry is coquettish. Sebastien is stalinist. Sebastien is swazi. Sebastien is unbrushed. Sebastien is coquettish. Sebastien is pyaemic. Sebastien is ergodic. Sebastien is hollow. All stalinist, unbrushed things are hollow. Red, hollow things are stalinist. All coquettish, stalinist things are pyaemic. All stalinist things are swazi. All unbrushed things are swazi. If something is swazi then it is stalinist. Grethel is not swazi.", "logic": "\nCoquettish(amy)\nPyaemic(amy)\nErgodic(amy)\nHollow(amy)\nStalinist(grethel)\nUnbrushed(grethel)\nHollow(grethel)\nUnbrushed(lorry)\nCoquettish(lorry)\nStalinist(sebastien)\nSwazi(sebastien)\nUnbrushed(sebastien)\nCoquettish(sebastien)\nPyaemic(sebastien)\nErgodic(sebastien)\nHollow(sebastien)\nforall x (Stalinist(x) and Unbrushed(x) -> Hollow(x))\nforall x (Coquettish(x) and Hollow(x) -> Stalinist(x))\nforall x (Coquettish(x) and Stalinist(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Stalinist(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Unbrushed(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Swazi(x) -> Stalinist(x))\n\nnot Swazi(grethel)\n\nStalinist(grethel) and forall x (Stalinist(x) -> Swazi(x)) -> therefore Swazi(grethel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Rowena is gaudy. Rowena is numbing. Rowena is gaussian. Rowena is astronomic. Rahal is oaken. Rahal is threescore. Rahal is astronomic. Fons is threescore. Fons is gaudy. Hussein is oaken. Hussein is burbling. Hussein is threescore. Hussein is gaudy. Hussein is numbing. Hussein is gaussian. Hussein is astronomic. All oaken, threescore things are astronomic. Red, astronomic things are oaken. All gaudy, oaken things are numbing. All oaken things are burbling. All threescore things are burbling. If something is burbling then it is oaken. Rowena is burbling.", "logic": "\nGaudy(rowena)\nNumbing(rowena)\nGaussian(rowena)\nAstronomic(rowena)\nOaken(rahal)\nThreescore(rahal)\nAstronomic(rahal)\nThreescore(fons)\nGaudy(fons)\nOaken(hussein)\nBurbling(hussein)\nThreescore(hussein)\nGaudy(hussein)\nNumbing(hussein)\nGaussian(hussein)\nAstronomic(hussein)\nforall x (Oaken(x) and Threescore(x) -> Astronomic(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Astronomic(x) -> Oaken(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Oaken(x) -> Numbing(x))\nforall x (Oaken(x) -> Burbling(x))\nforall x (Threescore(x) -> Burbling(x))\nforall x (Burbling(x) -> Oaken(x))\n\nBurbling(rowena)\n\nGaudy(rowena) and Astronomic(rowena) and forall x (Gaudy(x) and Astronomic(x) -> Oaken(x)) -> therefore Oaken(rowena) Oaken(rowena) and forall x (Oaken(x) -> Burbling(x)) -> therefore Burbling(rowena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Cliff is paid. Cliff is hindi. Cliff is homiletic. Cliff is bifoliate. Daune is flavourful. Daune is devout. Daune is bifoliate. Myles is devout. Myles is paid. Durante is flavourful. Durante is basal. Durante is devout. Durante is paid. Durante is hindi. Durante is homiletic. Durante is bifoliate. All flavourful, devout things are bifoliate. Red, bifoliate things are flavourful. All paid, flavourful things are hindi. All flavourful things are basal. All devout things are basal. If something is basal then it is flavourful. Myles is not flavourful.", "logic": "\nPaid(cliff)\nHindi(cliff)\nHomiletic(cliff)\nBifoliate(cliff)\nFlavourful(daune)\nDevout(daune)\nBifoliate(daune)\nDevout(myles)\nPaid(myles)\nFlavourful(durante)\nBasal(durante)\nDevout(durante)\nPaid(durante)\nHindi(durante)\nHomiletic(durante)\nBifoliate(durante)\nforall x (Flavourful(x) and Devout(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Paid(x) and Bifoliate(x) -> Flavourful(x))\nforall x (Paid(x) and Flavourful(x) -> Hindi(x))\nforall x (Flavourful(x) -> Basal(x))\nforall x (Devout(x) -> Basal(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Flavourful(x))\n\nnot Flavourful(myles)\n\nDevout(myles) and forall x (Devout(x) -> Basal(x)) -> therefore Basal(myles) Basal(myles) and forall x (Basal(x) -> Flavourful(x)) -> therefore Flavourful(myles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Marketa is unhygienic. Marketa is unattired. Marketa is papuan. Marketa is unafraid. Lari is travelable. Lari is dazzled. Lari is unafraid. Marianna is dazzled. Marianna is unhygienic. France is travelable. France is flemish. France is dazzled. France is unhygienic. France is unattired. France is papuan. France is unafraid. All travelable, dazzled things are unafraid. Red, unafraid things are travelable. All unhygienic, travelable things are unattired. All travelable things are flemish. All dazzled things are flemish. If something is flemish then it is travelable. Marianna is unattired.", "logic": "\nUnhygienic(marketa)\nUnattired(marketa)\nPapuan(marketa)\nUnafraid(marketa)\nTravelable(lari)\nDazzled(lari)\nUnafraid(lari)\nDazzled(marianna)\nUnhygienic(marianna)\nTravelable(france)\nFlemish(france)\nDazzled(france)\nUnhygienic(france)\nUnattired(france)\nPapuan(france)\nUnafraid(france)\nforall x (Travelable(x) and Dazzled(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) and Unafraid(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) and Travelable(x) -> Unattired(x))\nforall x (Travelable(x) -> Flemish(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) -> Flemish(x))\nforall x (Flemish(x) -> Travelable(x))\n\nUnattired(marianna)\n\nDazzled(marianna) and forall x (Dazzled(x) -> Flemish(x)) -> therefore Flemish(marianna) Flemish(marianna) and forall x (Flemish(x) -> Travelable(x)) -> therefore Travelable(marianna) Unhygienic(marianna) and Travelable(marianna) and forall x (Unhygienic(x) and Travelable(x) -> Unattired(x)) -> therefore Unattired(marianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Guenevere is raging. Guenevere is screwy. Guenevere is demulcent. Guenevere is luckless. Emery is bicipital. Emery is insistent. Emery is luckless. Vicki is insistent. Vicki is raging. Manny is bicipital. Manny is dutch. Manny is insistent. Manny is raging. Manny is screwy. Manny is demulcent. Manny is luckless. All bicipital, insistent things are luckless. Red, luckless things are bicipital. All raging, bicipital things are screwy. All bicipital things are dutch. All insistent things are dutch. If something is dutch then it is bicipital. Vicki is not luckless.", "logic": "\nRaging(guenevere)\nScrewy(guenevere)\nDemulcent(guenevere)\nLuckless(guenevere)\nBicipital(emery)\nInsistent(emery)\nLuckless(emery)\nInsistent(vicki)\nRaging(vicki)\nBicipital(manny)\nDutch(manny)\nInsistent(manny)\nRaging(manny)\nScrewy(manny)\nDemulcent(manny)\nLuckless(manny)\nforall x (Bicipital(x) and Insistent(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) and Luckless(x) -> Bicipital(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) and Bicipital(x) -> Screwy(x))\nforall x (Bicipital(x) -> Dutch(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) -> Dutch(x))\nforall x (Dutch(x) -> Bicipital(x))\n\nnot Luckless(vicki)\n\nInsistent(vicki) and forall x (Insistent(x) -> Dutch(x)) -> therefore Dutch(vicki) Dutch(vicki) and forall x (Dutch(x) -> Bicipital(x)) -> therefore Bicipital(vicki) Bicipital(vicki) and Insistent(vicki) and forall x (Bicipital(x) and Insistent(x) -> Luckless(x)) -> therefore Luckless(vicki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Jillene is fibrous. Jillene is deserved. Jillene is honorable. Jillene is wintery. Cassie is vagile. Cassie is impalpable. Cassie is wintery. Fairfax is impalpable. Fairfax is fibrous. Pippy is vagile. Pippy is burdensome. Pippy is impalpable. Pippy is fibrous. Pippy is deserved. Pippy is honorable. Pippy is wintery. All vagile, impalpable things are wintery. Red, wintery things are vagile. All fibrous, vagile things are deserved. All vagile things are burdensome. All impalpable things are burdensome. If something is burdensome then it is vagile. Cassie is not deserved.", "logic": "\nFibrous(jillene)\nDeserved(jillene)\nHonorable(jillene)\nWintery(jillene)\nVagile(cassie)\nImpalpable(cassie)\nWintery(cassie)\nImpalpable(fairfax)\nFibrous(fairfax)\nVagile(pippy)\nBurdensome(pippy)\nImpalpable(pippy)\nFibrous(pippy)\nDeserved(pippy)\nHonorable(pippy)\nWintery(pippy)\nforall x (Vagile(x) and Impalpable(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) and Wintery(x) -> Vagile(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) and Vagile(x) -> Deserved(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Impalpable(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Burdensome(x) -> Vagile(x))\n\nnot Deserved(cassie)\n\nforall x (Fibrous(x) and Vagile(x) -> Deserved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Deanne is affine. Deanne is opencast. Deanne is untalented. Deanne is chordate. Tess is bonzer. Tess is hierarchic. Tess is chordate. Omar is hierarchic. Omar is affine. Levin is bonzer. Levin is vendible. Levin is hierarchic. Levin is affine. Levin is opencast. Levin is untalented. Levin is chordate. All bonzer, hierarchic things are chordate. Red, chordate things are bonzer. All affine, bonzer things are opencast. All bonzer things are vendible. All hierarchic things are vendible. If something is vendible then it is bonzer. Deanne is hierarchic.", "logic": "\nAffine(deanne)\nOpencast(deanne)\nUntalented(deanne)\nChordate(deanne)\nBonzer(tess)\nHierarchic(tess)\nChordate(tess)\nHierarchic(omar)\nAffine(omar)\nBonzer(levin)\nVendible(levin)\nHierarchic(levin)\nAffine(levin)\nOpencast(levin)\nUntalented(levin)\nChordate(levin)\nforall x (Bonzer(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> Chordate(x))\nforall x (Affine(x) and Chordate(x) -> Bonzer(x))\nforall x (Affine(x) and Bonzer(x) -> Opencast(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) -> Vendible(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) -> Vendible(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Bonzer(x))\n\nHierarchic(deanne)\n\nHierarchic(deanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Cicely is sparkling. Cicely is withered. Cicely is undesired. Cicely is antiblack. Keriann is miasmal. Keriann is cadastral. Keriann is antiblack. Steffen is cadastral. Steffen is sparkling. Norris is miasmal. Norris is cosy. Norris is cadastral. Norris is sparkling. Norris is withered. Norris is undesired. Norris is antiblack. All miasmal, cadastral things are antiblack. Red, antiblack things are miasmal. All sparkling, miasmal things are withered. All miasmal things are cosy. All cadastral things are cosy. If something is cosy then it is miasmal. Steffen is not undesired.", "logic": "\nSparkling(cicely)\nWithered(cicely)\nUndesired(cicely)\nAntiblack(cicely)\nMiasmal(keriann)\nCadastral(keriann)\nAntiblack(keriann)\nCadastral(steffen)\nSparkling(steffen)\nMiasmal(norris)\nCosy(norris)\nCadastral(norris)\nSparkling(norris)\nWithered(norris)\nUndesired(norris)\nAntiblack(norris)\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Cadastral(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) and Antiblack(x) -> Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) and Miasmal(x) -> Withered(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) -> Cosy(x))\nforall x (Cadastral(x) -> Cosy(x))\nforall x (Cosy(x) -> Miasmal(x))\n\nnot Undesired(steffen)\n\nnot Undesired(steffen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Gabriella is simulated. Gabriella is obliging. Gabriella is insolvent. Gabriella is restless. Laura is scraggy. Laura is disjunct. Laura is restless. Kylynn is disjunct. Kylynn is simulated. Jandy is scraggy. Jandy is licked. Jandy is disjunct. Jandy is simulated. Jandy is obliging. Jandy is insolvent. Jandy is restless. All scraggy, disjunct things are restless. Red, restless things are scraggy. All simulated, scraggy things are obliging. All scraggy things are licked. All disjunct things are licked. If something is licked then it is scraggy. Laura is insolvent.", "logic": "\nSimulated(gabriella)\nObliging(gabriella)\nInsolvent(gabriella)\nRestless(gabriella)\nScraggy(laura)\nDisjunct(laura)\nRestless(laura)\nDisjunct(kylynn)\nSimulated(kylynn)\nScraggy(jandy)\nLicked(jandy)\nDisjunct(jandy)\nSimulated(jandy)\nObliging(jandy)\nInsolvent(jandy)\nRestless(jandy)\nforall x (Scraggy(x) and Disjunct(x) -> Restless(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) and Restless(x) -> Scraggy(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) and Scraggy(x) -> Obliging(x))\nforall x (Scraggy(x) -> Licked(x))\nforall x (Disjunct(x) -> Licked(x))\nforall x (Licked(x) -> Scraggy(x))\n\nInsolvent(laura)\n\nInsolvent(laura) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The karon chance the bonnee. The bonnee does not visit the karon. If something chance the bonnee then the bonnee husk the karon. If something husk the karon then the karon husk the bonnee. If something husk the karon then the karon husk the bonnee. If the bonnee chance the karon and the karon does not visit the bonnee then the karon husk the bonnee. If something is large and it describe the karon then it does not like the karon. If something describe the bonnee then it husk the karon. If something is sallow and it does not need the karon then the karon describe the bonnee. If something husk the bonnee then it is not sallow. The bonnee does not visit the karon.", "logic": "\nChance(karon, bonnee)\nnot Chance(bonnee, karon)\nforall x (Chance(x, bonnee) -> Husk(bonnee, karon))\nforall x (Husk(x, karon) -> Husk(karon, bonnee))\nforall x (Husk(x, karon) -> Husk(karon, bonnee))\nChance(bonnee, karon) and not Chance(karon, bonnee) -> Husk(karon, bonnee)\nforall x (Large(x) and Describe(x, karon) -> not Husk(x, karon))\nforall x (Describe(x, bonnee) -> Husk(x, karon))\nforall x (Sallow(x) and not Describe(x, karon) -> Describe(karon, bonnee))\nforall x (Husk(x, bonnee) -> not Sallow(x))\n\nnot Chance(bonnee, karon)\n\ntherefore not Chance(bonnee, karon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The cody laugh the doro. The doro does not visit the cody. If something laugh the doro then the doro encircle the cody. If something encircle the cody then the cody encircle the doro. If something encircle the cody then the cody encircle the doro. If the doro laugh the cody and the cody does not visit the doro then the cody encircle the doro. If something is abulic and it replete the cody then it does not like the cody. If something replete the doro then it encircle the cody. If something is clausal and it does not need the cody then the cody replete the doro. If something encircle the doro then it is not clausal. The cody does not visit the doro.", "logic": "\nLaugh(cody, doro)\nnot Laugh(doro, cody)\nforall x (Laugh(x, doro) -> Encircle(doro, cody))\nforall x (Encircle(x, cody) -> Encircle(cody, doro))\nforall x (Encircle(x, cody) -> Encircle(cody, doro))\nLaugh(doro, cody) and not Laugh(cody, doro) -> Encircle(cody, doro)\nforall x (Abulic(x) and Replete(x, cody) -> not Encircle(x, cody))\nforall x (Replete(x, doro) -> Encircle(x, cody))\nforall x (Clausal(x) and not Replete(x, cody) -> Replete(cody, doro))\nforall x (Encircle(x, doro) -> not Clausal(x))\n\nnot Laugh(cody, doro)\n\ntherefore Laugh(cody, doro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The mab resize the guillermo. The guillermo does not visit the mab. If something resize the guillermo then the guillermo sideswipe the mab. If something sideswipe the mab then the mab sideswipe the guillermo. If something sideswipe the mab then the mab sideswipe the guillermo. If the guillermo resize the mab and the mab does not visit the guillermo then the mab sideswipe the guillermo. If something is vulgar and it forfeit the mab then it does not like the mab. If something forfeit the guillermo then it sideswipe the mab. If something is centrist and it does not need the mab then the mab forfeit the guillermo. If something sideswipe the guillermo then it is not centrist. The guillermo sideswipe the mab.", "logic": "\nResize(mab, guillermo)\nnot Resize(guillermo, mab)\nforall x (Resize(x, guillermo) -> Sideswipe(guillermo, mab))\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, mab) -> Sideswipe(mab, guillermo))\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, mab) -> Sideswipe(mab, guillermo))\nResize(guillermo, mab) and not Resize(mab, guillermo) -> Sideswipe(mab, guillermo)\nforall x (Vulgar(x) and Forfeit(x, mab) -> not Sideswipe(x, mab))\nforall x (Forfeit(x, guillermo) -> Sideswipe(x, mab))\nforall x (Centrist(x) and not Forfeit(x, mab) -> Forfeit(mab, guillermo))\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, guillermo) -> not Centrist(x))\n\nSideswipe(guillermo, mab)\n\nResize(mab, guillermo) and forall x (Resize(x, guillermo) -> Sideswipe(guillermo, mab)) -> therefore Sideswipe(guillermo, mab)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The alwin father the matt. The matt does not visit the alwin. If something father the matt then the matt comb the alwin. If something comb the alwin then the alwin comb the matt. If something comb the alwin then the alwin comb the matt. If the matt father the alwin and the alwin does not visit the matt then the alwin comb the matt. If something is unwanted and it bisect the alwin then it does not like the alwin. If something bisect the matt then it comb the alwin. If something is matte and it does not need the alwin then the alwin bisect the matt. If something comb the matt then it is not matte. The matt does not like the alwin.", "logic": "\nFather(alwin, matt)\nnot Father(matt, alwin)\nforall x (Father(x, matt) -> Comb(matt, alwin))\nforall x (Comb(x, alwin) -> Comb(alwin, matt))\nforall x (Comb(x, alwin) -> Comb(alwin, matt))\nFather(matt, alwin) and not Father(alwin, matt) -> Comb(alwin, matt)\nforall x (Unwanted(x) and Bisect(x, alwin) -> not Comb(x, alwin))\nforall x (Bisect(x, matt) -> Comb(x, alwin))\nforall x (Matte(x) and not Bisect(x, alwin) -> Bisect(alwin, matt))\nforall x (Comb(x, matt) -> not Matte(x))\n\nnot Comb(matt, alwin)\n\nFather(alwin, matt) and forall x (Father(x, matt) -> Comb(matt, alwin)) -> therefore Comb(matt, alwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The chelsie supplant the bridgett. The bridgett does not visit the chelsie. If something supplant the bridgett then the bridgett open the chelsie. If something open the chelsie then the chelsie open the bridgett. If something open the chelsie then the chelsie open the bridgett. If the bridgett supplant the chelsie and the chelsie does not visit the bridgett then the chelsie open the bridgett. If something is carmelite and it stretch the chelsie then it does not like the chelsie. If something stretch the bridgett then it open the chelsie. If something is abortive and it does not need the chelsie then the chelsie stretch the bridgett. If something open the bridgett then it is not abortive. The chelsie open the bridgett.", "logic": "\nSupplant(chelsie, bridgett)\nnot Supplant(bridgett, chelsie)\nforall x (Supplant(x, bridgett) -> Open(bridgett, chelsie))\nforall x (Open(x, chelsie) -> Open(chelsie, bridgett))\nforall x (Open(x, chelsie) -> Open(chelsie, bridgett))\nSupplant(bridgett, chelsie) and not Supplant(chelsie, bridgett) -> Open(chelsie, bridgett)\nforall x (Carmelite(x) and Stretch(x, chelsie) -> not Open(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Stretch(x, bridgett) -> Open(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Abortive(x) and not Stretch(x, chelsie) -> Stretch(chelsie, bridgett))\nforall x (Open(x, bridgett) -> not Abortive(x))\n\nOpen(chelsie, bridgett)\n\nSupplant(chelsie, bridgett) and forall x (Supplant(x, bridgett) -> Open(bridgett, chelsie)) -> therefore Open(bridgett, chelsie) Open(bridgett, chelsie) and forall x (Open(x, chelsie) -> Open(chelsie, bridgett)) -> therefore Open(chelsie, bridgett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The abbe elevate the elysee. The elysee does not visit the abbe. If something elevate the elysee then the elysee shmooze the abbe. If something shmooze the abbe then the abbe shmooze the elysee. If something shmooze the abbe then the abbe shmooze the elysee. If the elysee elevate the abbe and the abbe does not visit the elysee then the abbe shmooze the elysee. If something is wordless and it neuter the abbe then it does not like the abbe. If something neuter the elysee then it shmooze the abbe. If something is submersed and it does not need the abbe then the abbe neuter the elysee. If something shmooze the elysee then it is not submersed. The abbe does not like the elysee.", "logic": "\nElevate(abbe, elysee)\nnot Elevate(elysee, abbe)\nforall x (Elevate(x, elysee) -> Shmooze(elysee, abbe))\nforall x (Shmooze(x, abbe) -> Shmooze(abbe, elysee))\nforall x (Shmooze(x, abbe) -> Shmooze(abbe, elysee))\nElevate(elysee, abbe) and not Elevate(abbe, elysee) -> Shmooze(abbe, elysee)\nforall x (Wordless(x) and Neuter(x, abbe) -> not Shmooze(x, abbe))\nforall x (Neuter(x, elysee) -> Shmooze(x, abbe))\nforall x (Submersed(x) and not Neuter(x, abbe) -> Neuter(abbe, elysee))\nforall x (Shmooze(x, elysee) -> not Submersed(x))\n\nnot Shmooze(abbe, elysee)\n\nElevate(abbe, elysee) and forall x (Elevate(x, elysee) -> Shmooze(elysee, abbe)) -> therefore Shmooze(elysee, abbe) Shmooze(elysee, abbe) and forall x (Shmooze(x, abbe) -> Shmooze(abbe, elysee)) -> therefore Shmooze(abbe, elysee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The lavena write the elora. The elora does not visit the lavena. If something write the elora then the elora underlie the lavena. If something underlie the lavena then the lavena underlie the elora. If something underlie the lavena then the lavena underlie the elora. If the elora write the lavena and the lavena does not visit the elora then the lavena underlie the elora. If something is salubrious and it miaou the lavena then it does not like the lavena. If something miaou the elora then it underlie the lavena. If something is computable and it does not need the lavena then the lavena miaou the elora. If something underlie the elora then it is not computable. The lavena is not computable.", "logic": "\nWrite(lavena, elora)\nnot Write(elora, lavena)\nforall x (Write(x, elora) -> Underlie(elora, lavena))\nforall x (Underlie(x, lavena) -> Underlie(lavena, elora))\nforall x (Underlie(x, lavena) -> Underlie(lavena, elora))\nWrite(elora, lavena) and not Write(lavena, elora) -> Underlie(lavena, elora)\nforall x (Salubrious(x) and Miaou(x, lavena) -> not Underlie(x, lavena))\nforall x (Miaou(x, elora) -> Underlie(x, lavena))\nforall x (Computable(x) and not Miaou(x, lavena) -> Miaou(lavena, elora))\nforall x (Underlie(x, elora) -> not Computable(x))\n\nnot Computable(lavena)\n\nWrite(lavena, elora) and forall x (Write(x, elora) -> Underlie(elora, lavena)) -> therefore Underlie(elora, lavena) Underlie(elora, lavena) and forall x (Underlie(x, lavena) -> Underlie(lavena, elora)) -> therefore Underlie(lavena, elora) Underlie(lavena, elora) and forall x (Underlie(x, elora) -> not Computable(x)) -> therefore not Computable(lavena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The ramsay crenellate the hailee. The hailee does not visit the ramsay. If something crenellate the hailee then the hailee outnumber the ramsay. If something outnumber the ramsay then the ramsay outnumber the hailee. If something outnumber the ramsay then the ramsay outnumber the hailee. If the hailee crenellate the ramsay and the ramsay does not visit the hailee then the ramsay outnumber the hailee. If something is buffeted and it saute the ramsay then it does not like the ramsay. If something saute the hailee then it outnumber the ramsay. If something is bated and it does not need the ramsay then the ramsay saute the hailee. If something outnumber the hailee then it is not bated. The ramsay is bated.", "logic": "\nCrenellate(ramsay, hailee)\nnot Crenellate(hailee, ramsay)\nforall x (Crenellate(x, hailee) -> Outnumber(hailee, ramsay))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, ramsay) -> Outnumber(ramsay, hailee))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, ramsay) -> Outnumber(ramsay, hailee))\nCrenellate(hailee, ramsay) and not Crenellate(ramsay, hailee) -> Outnumber(ramsay, hailee)\nforall x (Buffeted(x) and Saute(x, ramsay) -> not Outnumber(x, ramsay))\nforall x (Saute(x, hailee) -> Outnumber(x, ramsay))\nforall x (Bated(x) and not Saute(x, ramsay) -> Saute(ramsay, hailee))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, hailee) -> not Bated(x))\n\nBated(ramsay)\n\nCrenellate(ramsay, hailee) and forall x (Crenellate(x, hailee) -> Outnumber(hailee, ramsay)) -> therefore Outnumber(hailee, ramsay) Outnumber(hailee, ramsay) and forall x (Outnumber(x, ramsay) -> Outnumber(ramsay, hailee)) -> therefore Outnumber(ramsay, hailee) Outnumber(ramsay, hailee) and forall x (Outnumber(x, hailee) -> not Bated(x)) -> therefore not Bated(ramsay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The dee prizefight the karil. The karil does not visit the dee. If something prizefight the karil then the karil retrofit the dee. If something retrofit the dee then the dee retrofit the karil. If something retrofit the dee then the dee retrofit the karil. If the karil prizefight the dee and the dee does not visit the karil then the dee retrofit the karil. If something is mendacious and it clarion the dee then it does not like the dee. If something clarion the karil then it retrofit the dee. If something is salivary and it does not need the dee then the dee clarion the karil. If something retrofit the karil then it is not salivary. The dee does not need the karil.", "logic": "\nPrizefight(dee, karil)\nnot Prizefight(karil, dee)\nforall x (Prizefight(x, karil) -> Retrofit(karil, dee))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, dee) -> Retrofit(dee, karil))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, dee) -> Retrofit(dee, karil))\nPrizefight(karil, dee) and not Prizefight(dee, karil) -> Retrofit(dee, karil)\nforall x (Mendacious(x) and Clarion(x, dee) -> not Retrofit(x, dee))\nforall x (Clarion(x, karil) -> Retrofit(x, dee))\nforall x (Salivary(x) and not Clarion(x, dee) -> Clarion(dee, karil))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, karil) -> not Salivary(x))\n\nnot Clarion(dee, karil)\n\nforall x (Salivary(x) and not Clarion(x, dee) -> Clarion(dee, karil)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The david covenant the mace. The mace does not visit the david. If something covenant the mace then the mace twit the david. If something twit the david then the david twit the mace. If something twit the david then the david twit the mace. If the mace covenant the david and the david does not visit the mace then the david twit the mace. If something is uncleared and it reflect the david then it does not like the david. If something reflect the mace then it twit the david. If something is elder and it does not need the david then the david reflect the mace. If something twit the mace then it is not elder. The david twit the david.", "logic": "\nCovenant(david, mace)\nnot Covenant(mace, david)\nforall x (Covenant(x, mace) -> Twit(mace, david))\nforall x (Twit(x, david) -> Twit(david, mace))\nforall x (Twit(x, david) -> Twit(david, mace))\nCovenant(mace, david) and not Covenant(david, mace) -> Twit(david, mace)\nforall x (Uncleared(x) and Reflect(x, david) -> not Twit(x, david))\nforall x (Reflect(x, mace) -> Twit(x, david))\nforall x (Elder(x) and not Reflect(x, david) -> Reflect(david, mace))\nforall x (Twit(x, mace) -> not Elder(x))\n\nTwit(david, david)\n\nforall x (Reflect(x, mace) -> Twit(x, david)) <- forall x (Elder(x) and not Reflect(x, david) -> Reflect(david, mace)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The chelsy desalinise the kenna. The kenna does not visit the chelsy. If something desalinise the kenna then the kenna kotow the chelsy. If something kotow the chelsy then the chelsy kotow the kenna. If something kotow the chelsy then the chelsy kotow the kenna. If the kenna desalinise the chelsy and the chelsy does not visit the kenna then the chelsy kotow the kenna. If something is nonviscid and it best the chelsy then it does not like the chelsy. If something best the kenna then it kotow the chelsy. If something is extropic and it does not need the chelsy then the chelsy best the kenna. If something kotow the kenna then it is not extropic. The chelsy is not nice.", "logic": "\nDesalinise(chelsy, kenna)\nnot Desalinise(kenna, chelsy)\nforall x (Desalinise(x, kenna) -> Kotow(kenna, chelsy))\nforall x (Kotow(x, chelsy) -> Kotow(chelsy, kenna))\nforall x (Kotow(x, chelsy) -> Kotow(chelsy, kenna))\nDesalinise(kenna, chelsy) and not Desalinise(chelsy, kenna) -> Kotow(chelsy, kenna)\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) and Best(x, chelsy) -> not Kotow(x, chelsy))\nforall x (Best(x, kenna) -> Kotow(x, chelsy))\nforall x (Extropic(x) and not Best(x, chelsy) -> Best(chelsy, kenna))\nforall x (Kotow(x, kenna) -> not Extropic(x))\n\nnot Nice(chelsy)\n\nnot Nice(chelsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The zsazsa republish the cally. The cally does not visit the zsazsa. If something republish the cally then the cally chute the zsazsa. If something chute the zsazsa then the zsazsa chute the cally. If something chute the zsazsa then the zsazsa chute the cally. If the cally republish the zsazsa and the zsazsa does not visit the cally then the zsazsa chute the cally. If something is sublingual and it examine the zsazsa then it does not like the zsazsa. If something examine the cally then it chute the zsazsa. If something is streetwise and it does not need the zsazsa then the zsazsa examine the cally. If something chute the cally then it is not streetwise. The cally chute the cally.", "logic": "\nRepublish(zsazsa, cally)\nnot Republish(cally, zsazsa)\nforall x (Republish(x, cally) -> Chute(cally, zsazsa))\nforall x (Chute(x, zsazsa) -> Chute(zsazsa, cally))\nforall x (Chute(x, zsazsa) -> Chute(zsazsa, cally))\nRepublish(cally, zsazsa) and not Republish(zsazsa, cally) -> Chute(zsazsa, cally)\nforall x (Sublingual(x) and Examine(x, zsazsa) -> not Chute(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Examine(x, cally) -> Chute(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Streetwise(x) and not Examine(x, zsazsa) -> Examine(zsazsa, cally))\nforall x (Chute(x, cally) -> not Streetwise(x))\n\nChute(cally, cally)\n\nChute(cally, cally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The zeke colorise the junette. The junette does not visit the zeke. If something colorise the junette then the junette wrest the zeke. If something wrest the zeke then the zeke wrest the junette. If something wrest the zeke then the zeke wrest the junette. If the junette colorise the zeke and the zeke does not visit the junette then the zeke wrest the junette. If something is avian and it hash the zeke then it does not like the zeke. If something hash the junette then it wrest the zeke. If something is unaffected and it does not need the zeke then the zeke hash the junette. If something wrest the junette then it is not unaffected. The junette is not avian.", "logic": "\nColorise(zeke, junette)\nnot Colorise(junette, zeke)\nforall x (Colorise(x, junette) -> Wrest(junette, zeke))\nforall x (Wrest(x, zeke) -> Wrest(zeke, junette))\nforall x (Wrest(x, zeke) -> Wrest(zeke, junette))\nColorise(junette, zeke) and not Colorise(zeke, junette) -> Wrest(zeke, junette)\nforall x (Avian(x) and Hash(x, zeke) -> not Wrest(x, zeke))\nforall x (Hash(x, junette) -> Wrest(x, zeke))\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and not Hash(x, zeke) -> Hash(zeke, junette))\nforall x (Wrest(x, junette) -> not Unaffected(x))\n\nnot Avian(junette)\n\nnot Avian(junette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The lauryn salt the matilda. The matilda does not visit the lauryn. If something salt the matilda then the matilda illustrate the lauryn. If something illustrate the lauryn then the lauryn illustrate the matilda. If something illustrate the lauryn then the lauryn illustrate the matilda. If the matilda salt the lauryn and the lauryn does not visit the matilda then the lauryn illustrate the matilda. If something is zymoid and it calender the lauryn then it does not like the lauryn. If something calender the matilda then it illustrate the lauryn. If something is spanking and it does not need the lauryn then the lauryn calender the matilda. If something illustrate the matilda then it is not spanking. The lauryn salt the lauryn.", "logic": "\nSalt(lauryn, matilda)\nnot Salt(matilda, lauryn)\nforall x (Salt(x, matilda) -> Illustrate(matilda, lauryn))\nforall x (Illustrate(x, lauryn) -> Illustrate(lauryn, matilda))\nforall x (Illustrate(x, lauryn) -> Illustrate(lauryn, matilda))\nSalt(matilda, lauryn) and not Salt(lauryn, matilda) -> Illustrate(lauryn, matilda)\nforall x (Zymoid(x) and Calender(x, lauryn) -> not Illustrate(x, lauryn))\nforall x (Calender(x, matilda) -> Illustrate(x, lauryn))\nforall x (Spanking(x) and not Calender(x, lauryn) -> Calender(lauryn, matilda))\nforall x (Illustrate(x, matilda) -> not Spanking(x))\n\nSalt(lauryn, lauryn)\n\nSalt(lauryn, lauryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The harald worsen the gennie. The gennie does not visit the harald. If something worsen the gennie then the gennie deprave the harald. If something deprave the harald then the harald deprave the gennie. If something deprave the harald then the harald deprave the gennie. If the gennie worsen the harald and the harald does not visit the gennie then the harald deprave the gennie. If something is reassuring and it premiere the harald then it does not like the harald. If something premiere the gennie then it deprave the harald. If something is thundery and it does not need the harald then the harald premiere the gennie. If something deprave the gennie then it is not thundery. The gennie does not need the gennie.", "logic": "\nWorsen(harald, gennie)\nnot Worsen(gennie, harald)\nforall x (Worsen(x, gennie) -> Deprave(gennie, harald))\nforall x (Deprave(x, harald) -> Deprave(harald, gennie))\nforall x (Deprave(x, harald) -> Deprave(harald, gennie))\nWorsen(gennie, harald) and not Worsen(harald, gennie) -> Deprave(harald, gennie)\nforall x (Reassuring(x) and Premiere(x, harald) -> not Deprave(x, harald))\nforall x (Premiere(x, gennie) -> Deprave(x, harald))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and not Premiere(x, harald) -> Premiere(harald, gennie))\nforall x (Deprave(x, gennie) -> not Thundery(x))\n\nnot Premiere(gennie, gennie)\n\nnot Premiere(gennie, gennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The rozalie annotate the neely. The neely does not visit the rozalie. If something annotate the neely then the neely vitalise the rozalie. If something vitalise the rozalie then the rozalie vitalise the neely. If something vitalise the rozalie then the rozalie vitalise the neely. If the neely annotate the rozalie and the rozalie does not visit the neely then the rozalie vitalise the neely. If something is tuscan and it hitch the rozalie then it does not like the rozalie. If something hitch the neely then it vitalise the rozalie. If something is handheld and it does not need the rozalie then the rozalie hitch the neely. If something vitalise the neely then it is not handheld. The rozalie hitch the rozalie.", "logic": "\nAnnotate(rozalie, neely)\nnot Annotate(neely, rozalie)\nforall x (Annotate(x, neely) -> Vitalise(neely, rozalie))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, rozalie) -> Vitalise(rozalie, neely))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, rozalie) -> Vitalise(rozalie, neely))\nAnnotate(neely, rozalie) and not Annotate(rozalie, neely) -> Vitalise(rozalie, neely)\nforall x (Tuscan(x) and Hitch(x, rozalie) -> not Vitalise(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Hitch(x, neely) -> Vitalise(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Handheld(x) and not Hitch(x, rozalie) -> Hitch(rozalie, neely))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, neely) -> not Handheld(x))\n\nHitch(rozalie, rozalie)\n\nHitch(rozalie, rozalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The babs is unordered. Young people are not isothermic. If someone is nectarous then they are unordered. If someone is isothermic and shoddy then they are unordered. All shoddy, gleaming people are unordered. All gleaming, unordered people are shoddy. All gleaming people are shoddy. Red people are gleaming. If someone is unordered then they are not nectarous. The babs is unordered.", "logic": "\nUnordered(babs)\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> not Isothermic(x))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Unordered(x))\nforall x (Isothermic(x) and Shoddy(x) -> Unordered(x))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) and Gleaming(x) -> Unordered(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Unordered(x) -> Shoddy(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Shoddy(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) -> not Nectarous(x))\n\nUnordered(babs)\n\ntherefore Unordered(babs)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The shepherd is knavish. Young people are not fossil. If someone is basilary then they are knavish. If someone is fossil and antitumor then they are knavish. All antitumor, iraki people are knavish. All iraki, knavish people are antitumor. All iraki people are antitumor. Red people are iraki. If someone is knavish then they are not basilary. The shepherd is not knavish.", "logic": "\nKnavish(shepherd)\nforall x (Antitumor(x) -> not Fossil(x))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Fossil(x) and Antitumor(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) and Iraki(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Iraki(x) and Knavish(x) -> Antitumor(x))\nforall x (Iraki(x) -> Antitumor(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> Iraki(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> not Basilary(x))\n\nnot Knavish(shepherd)\n\ntherefore Knavish(shepherd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The rafaelia is cutaneous. Young people are not downscale. If someone is innocent then they are cutaneous. If someone is downscale and ruined then they are cutaneous. All ruined, square people are cutaneous. All square, cutaneous people are ruined. All square people are ruined. Red people are square. If someone is cutaneous then they are not innocent. The rafaelia is not innocent.", "logic": "\nCutaneous(rafaelia)\nforall x (Ruined(x) -> not Downscale(x))\nforall x (Innocent(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nforall x (Downscale(x) and Ruined(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nforall x (Ruined(x) and Square(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nforall x (Square(x) and Cutaneous(x) -> Ruined(x))\nforall x (Square(x) -> Ruined(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Square(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> not Innocent(x))\n\nnot Innocent(rafaelia)\n\nCutaneous(rafaelia) and forall x (Cutaneous(x) -> not Innocent(x)) -> therefore not Innocent(rafaelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The barbette is footsure. Young people are not loco. If someone is uneager then they are footsure. If someone is loco and onerous then they are footsure. All onerous, amoebous people are footsure. All amoebous, footsure people are onerous. All amoebous people are onerous. Red people are amoebous. If someone is footsure then they are not uneager. The barbette is not amoebous.", "logic": "\nFootsure(barbette)\nforall x (Onerous(x) -> not Loco(x))\nforall x (Uneager(x) -> Footsure(x))\nforall x (Loco(x) and Onerous(x) -> Footsure(x))\nforall x (Onerous(x) and Amoebous(x) -> Footsure(x))\nforall x (Amoebous(x) and Footsure(x) -> Onerous(x))\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Onerous(x))\nforall x (Footsure(x) -> Amoebous(x))\nforall x (Footsure(x) -> not Uneager(x))\n\nnot Amoebous(barbette)\n\nFootsure(barbette) and forall x (Footsure(x) -> Amoebous(x)) -> therefore Amoebous(barbette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The lynne is raddled. Young people are not inaudible. If someone is clockwise then they are raddled. If someone is inaudible and reprobate then they are raddled. All reprobate, blimpish people are raddled. All blimpish, raddled people are reprobate. All blimpish people are reprobate. Red people are blimpish. If someone is raddled then they are not clockwise. The lynne is reprobate.", "logic": "\nRaddled(lynne)\nforall x (Reprobate(x) -> not Inaudible(x))\nforall x (Clockwise(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Inaudible(x) and Reprobate(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Reprobate(x) and Blimpish(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Blimpish(x) and Raddled(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Blimpish(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Raddled(x) -> Blimpish(x))\nforall x (Raddled(x) -> not Clockwise(x))\n\nReprobate(lynne)\n\nRaddled(lynne) and forall x (Raddled(x) -> Blimpish(x)) -> therefore Blimpish(lynne) Blimpish(lynne) and forall x (Blimpish(x) -> Reprobate(x)) -> therefore Reprobate(lynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The fayina is fossil. Young people are not excretory. If someone is winking then they are fossil. If someone is excretory and overactive then they are fossil. All overactive, onetime people are fossil. All onetime, fossil people are overactive. All onetime people are overactive. Red people are onetime. If someone is fossil then they are not winking. The fayina is not overactive.", "logic": "\nFossil(fayina)\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> not Excretory(x))\nforall x (Winking(x) -> Fossil(x))\nforall x (Excretory(x) and Overactive(x) -> Fossil(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Onetime(x) -> Fossil(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) and Fossil(x) -> Overactive(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Overactive(x))\nforall x (Fossil(x) -> Onetime(x))\nforall x (Fossil(x) -> not Winking(x))\n\nnot Overactive(fayina)\n\nFossil(fayina) and forall x (Fossil(x) -> Onetime(x)) -> therefore Onetime(fayina) Onetime(fayina) and forall x (Onetime(x) -> Overactive(x)) -> therefore Overactive(fayina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The giorgio is unwounded. Young people are not septal. If someone is imploring then they are unwounded. If someone is septal and unselected then they are unwounded. All unselected, bust people are unwounded. All bust, unwounded people are unselected. All bust people are unselected. Red people are bust. If someone is unwounded then they are not imploring. The giorgio is not septal.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(giorgio)\nforall x (Unselected(x) -> not Septal(x))\nforall x (Imploring(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) and Unselected(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Unselected(x) and Bust(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Bust(x) and Unwounded(x) -> Unselected(x))\nforall x (Bust(x) -> Unselected(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) -> Bust(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) -> not Imploring(x))\n\nnot Septal(giorgio)\n\nUnwounded(giorgio) and forall x (Unwounded(x) -> Bust(x)) -> therefore Bust(giorgio) Bust(giorgio) and forall x (Bust(x) -> Unselected(x)) -> therefore Unselected(giorgio) Unselected(giorgio) and forall x (Unselected(x) -> not Septal(x)) -> therefore not Septal(giorgio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The quintus is wrongful. Young people are not tottery. If someone is pineal then they are wrongful. If someone is tottery and deafened then they are wrongful. All deafened, spasmodic people are wrongful. All spasmodic, wrongful people are deafened. All spasmodic people are deafened. Red people are spasmodic. If someone is wrongful then they are not pineal. The quintus is tottery.", "logic": "\nWrongful(quintus)\nforall x (Deafened(x) -> not Tottery(x))\nforall x (Pineal(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Tottery(x) and Deafened(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Deafened(x) and Spasmodic(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Spasmodic(x) and Wrongful(x) -> Deafened(x))\nforall x (Spasmodic(x) -> Deafened(x))\nforall x (Wrongful(x) -> Spasmodic(x))\nforall x (Wrongful(x) -> not Pineal(x))\n\nTottery(quintus)\n\nWrongful(quintus) and forall x (Wrongful(x) -> Spasmodic(x)) -> therefore Spasmodic(quintus) Spasmodic(quintus) and forall x (Spasmodic(x) -> Deafened(x)) -> therefore Deafened(quintus) Deafened(quintus) and forall x (Deafened(x) -> not Tottery(x)) -> therefore not Tottery(quintus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The marie is ghanaian. Young people are not mozartian. If someone is lowbrow then they are ghanaian. If someone is mozartian and syncarpous then they are ghanaian. All syncarpous, xliv people are ghanaian. All xliv, ghanaian people are syncarpous. All xliv people are syncarpous. Red people are xliv. If someone is ghanaian then they are not lowbrow. The marie does not need the marie.", "logic": "\nGhanaian(marie)\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) -> not Mozartian(x))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Mozartian(x) and Syncarpous(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) and Xliv(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Xliv(x) and Ghanaian(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Xliv(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Xliv(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> not Lowbrow(x))\n\nnot Needs(marie, marie)\n\nnot Needs(marie, marie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The yoshiko is azonic. Young people are not flippant. If someone is unorthodox then they are azonic. If someone is flippant and centenary then they are azonic. All centenary, bottommost people are azonic. All bottommost, azonic people are centenary. All bottommost people are centenary. Red people are bottommost. If someone is azonic then they are not unorthodox. The yoshiko chases the yoshiko.", "logic": "\nAzonic(yoshiko)\nforall x (Centenary(x) -> not Flippant(x))\nforall x (Unorthodox(x) -> Azonic(x))\nforall x (Flippant(x) and Centenary(x) -> Azonic(x))\nforall x (Centenary(x) and Bottommost(x) -> Azonic(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) and Azonic(x) -> Centenary(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Centenary(x))\nforall x (Azonic(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nforall x (Azonic(x) -> not Unorthodox(x))\n\nChases(yoshiko, yoshiko)\n\nChases(yoshiko, yoshiko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Harlan is insentient. Harlan is reverse. Harlan is teensy. Norry is conducive. Norry is lumpen. Godart is insentient. Godart is iodised. Godart is reverse. Godart is endogenic. Godart is teensy. If someone is lumpen then they are endogenic. Rough, teensy people are reverse. If someone is conducive and teensy then they are insentient. White, endogenic people are conducive. If someone is conducive then they are reverse. All endogenic people are teensy. Norry is lumpen.", "logic": "\nInsentient(harlan)\nReverse(harlan)\nTeensy(harlan)\nConducive(norry)\nLumpen(norry)\nInsentient(godart)\nIodised(godart)\nReverse(godart)\nEndogenic(godart)\nTeensy(godart)\nforall x (Lumpen(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) and Teensy(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Conducive(x) and Teensy(x) -> Insentient(x))\nforall x (Teensy(x) and Endogenic(x) -> Conducive(x))\nforall x (Conducive(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) -> Teensy(x))\n\nLumpen(norry)\n\ntherefore Lumpen(norry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Harriot is augustan. Harriot is hind. Harriot is wrapped. Dyna is taiwanese. Dyna is carpellate. Dorette is augustan. Dorette is shabby. Dorette is hind. Dorette is jungly. Dorette is wrapped. If someone is carpellate then they are jungly. Rough, wrapped people are hind. If someone is taiwanese and wrapped then they are augustan. White, jungly people are taiwanese. If someone is taiwanese then they are hind. All jungly people are wrapped. Harriot is not hind.", "logic": "\nAugustan(harriot)\nHind(harriot)\nWrapped(harriot)\nTaiwanese(dyna)\nCarpellate(dyna)\nAugustan(dorette)\nShabby(dorette)\nHind(dorette)\nJungly(dorette)\nWrapped(dorette)\nforall x (Carpellate(x) -> Jungly(x))\nforall x (Jungly(x) and Wrapped(x) -> Hind(x))\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) and Wrapped(x) -> Augustan(x))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) and Jungly(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) -> Hind(x))\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Wrapped(x))\n\nnot Hind(harriot)\n\ntherefore Hind(harriot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Cris is bahamian. Cris is dormy. Cris is boiled. Catlin is earthly. Catlin is befuddled. Anitra is bahamian. Anitra is beautiful. Anitra is dormy. Anitra is diabolical. Anitra is boiled. If someone is befuddled then they are diabolical. Rough, boiled people are dormy. If someone is earthly and boiled then they are bahamian. White, diabolical people are earthly. If someone is earthly then they are dormy. All diabolical people are boiled. Catlin is diabolical.", "logic": "\nBahamian(cris)\nDormy(cris)\nBoiled(cris)\nEarthly(catlin)\nBefuddled(catlin)\nBahamian(anitra)\nBeautiful(anitra)\nDormy(anitra)\nDiabolical(anitra)\nBoiled(anitra)\nforall x (Befuddled(x) -> Diabolical(x))\nforall x (Diabolical(x) and Boiled(x) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) and Boiled(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Boiled(x) and Diabolical(x) -> Earthly(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Diabolical(x) -> Boiled(x))\n\nDiabolical(catlin)\n\nBefuddled(catlin) and forall x (Befuddled(x) -> Diabolical(x)) -> therefore Diabolical(catlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Joete is joint. Joete is valiant. Joete is slavish. Laryssa is scrimy. Laryssa is inactive. Elinore is joint. Elinore is stealthy. Elinore is valiant. Elinore is unentitled. Elinore is slavish. If someone is inactive then they are unentitled. Rough, slavish people are valiant. If someone is scrimy and slavish then they are joint. White, unentitled people are scrimy. If someone is scrimy then they are valiant. All unentitled people are slavish. Laryssa is not unentitled.", "logic": "\nJoint(joete)\nValiant(joete)\nSlavish(joete)\nScrimy(laryssa)\nInactive(laryssa)\nJoint(elinore)\nStealthy(elinore)\nValiant(elinore)\nUnentitled(elinore)\nSlavish(elinore)\nforall x (Inactive(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Unentitled(x) and Slavish(x) -> Valiant(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) and Slavish(x) -> Joint(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Unentitled(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) -> Valiant(x))\nforall x (Unentitled(x) -> Slavish(x))\n\nnot Unentitled(laryssa)\n\nInactive(laryssa) and forall x (Inactive(x) -> Unentitled(x)) -> therefore Unentitled(laryssa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Rona is snowbound. Rona is oleophilic. Rona is socialist. Madella is almighty. Madella is thumbed. Gustave is snowbound. Gustave is splendid. Gustave is oleophilic. Gustave is ropy. Gustave is socialist. If someone is thumbed then they are ropy. Rough, socialist people are oleophilic. If someone is almighty and socialist then they are snowbound. White, ropy people are almighty. If someone is almighty then they are oleophilic. All ropy people are socialist. Madella is socialist.", "logic": "\nSnowbound(rona)\nOleophilic(rona)\nSocialist(rona)\nAlmighty(madella)\nThumbed(madella)\nSnowbound(gustave)\nSplendid(gustave)\nOleophilic(gustave)\nRopy(gustave)\nSocialist(gustave)\nforall x (Thumbed(x) -> Ropy(x))\nforall x (Ropy(x) and Socialist(x) -> Oleophilic(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) and Socialist(x) -> Snowbound(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) and Ropy(x) -> Almighty(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Oleophilic(x))\nforall x (Ropy(x) -> Socialist(x))\n\nSocialist(madella)\n\nThumbed(madella) and forall x (Thumbed(x) -> Ropy(x)) -> therefore Ropy(madella) Ropy(madella) and forall x (Ropy(x) -> Socialist(x)) -> therefore Socialist(madella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Riley is cinematic. Riley is lawless. Riley is autotelic. Kaylil is fourpenny. Kaylil is millennian. Morton is cinematic. Morton is northward. Morton is lawless. Morton is maverick. Morton is autotelic. If someone is millennian then they are maverick. Rough, autotelic people are lawless. If someone is fourpenny and autotelic then they are cinematic. White, maverick people are fourpenny. If someone is fourpenny then they are lawless. All maverick people are autotelic. Kaylil is not autotelic.", "logic": "\nCinematic(riley)\nLawless(riley)\nAutotelic(riley)\nFourpenny(kaylil)\nMillennian(kaylil)\nCinematic(morton)\nNorthward(morton)\nLawless(morton)\nMaverick(morton)\nAutotelic(morton)\nforall x (Millennian(x) -> Maverick(x))\nforall x (Maverick(x) and Autotelic(x) -> Lawless(x))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) and Autotelic(x) -> Cinematic(x))\nforall x (Autotelic(x) and Maverick(x) -> Fourpenny(x))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) -> Lawless(x))\nforall x (Maverick(x) -> Autotelic(x))\n\nnot Autotelic(kaylil)\n\nMillennian(kaylil) and forall x (Millennian(x) -> Maverick(x)) -> therefore Maverick(kaylil) Maverick(kaylil) and forall x (Maverick(x) -> Autotelic(x)) -> therefore Autotelic(kaylil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Obie is randomized. Obie is cherry. Obie is dustlike. Fredi is sarcastic. Fredi is ukrainian. Mariya is randomized. Mariya is dyadic. Mariya is cherry. Mariya is broached. Mariya is dustlike. If someone is ukrainian then they are broached. Rough, dustlike people are cherry. If someone is sarcastic and dustlike then they are randomized. White, broached people are sarcastic. If someone is sarcastic then they are cherry. All broached people are dustlike. Fredi is randomized.", "logic": "\nRandomized(obie)\nCherry(obie)\nDustlike(obie)\nSarcastic(fredi)\nUkrainian(fredi)\nRandomized(mariya)\nDyadic(mariya)\nCherry(mariya)\nBroached(mariya)\nDustlike(mariya)\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Broached(x))\nforall x (Broached(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Sarcastic(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Randomized(x))\nforall x (Dustlike(x) and Broached(x) -> Sarcastic(x))\nforall x (Sarcastic(x) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Broached(x) -> Dustlike(x))\n\nRandomized(fredi)\n\nUkrainian(fredi) and forall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Broached(x)) -> therefore Broached(fredi) Broached(fredi) and forall x (Broached(x) -> Dustlike(x)) -> therefore Dustlike(fredi) Sarcastic(fredi) and Dustlike(fredi) and forall x (Sarcastic(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Randomized(x)) -> therefore Randomized(fredi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Simone is sick. Simone is alary. Simone is ligneous. Zenia is nappy. Zenia is stirred. Fiorenze is sick. Fiorenze is unreported. Fiorenze is alary. Fiorenze is conjoint. Fiorenze is ligneous. If someone is stirred then they are conjoint. Rough, ligneous people are alary. If someone is nappy and ligneous then they are sick. White, conjoint people are nappy. If someone is nappy then they are alary. All conjoint people are ligneous. Zenia is not sick.", "logic": "\nSick(simone)\nAlary(simone)\nLigneous(simone)\nNappy(zenia)\nStirred(zenia)\nSick(fiorenze)\nUnreported(fiorenze)\nAlary(fiorenze)\nConjoint(fiorenze)\nLigneous(fiorenze)\nforall x (Stirred(x) -> Conjoint(x))\nforall x (Conjoint(x) and Ligneous(x) -> Alary(x))\nforall x (Nappy(x) and Ligneous(x) -> Sick(x))\nforall x (Ligneous(x) and Conjoint(x) -> Nappy(x))\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Alary(x))\nforall x (Conjoint(x) -> Ligneous(x))\n\nnot Sick(zenia)\n\nStirred(zenia) and forall x (Stirred(x) -> Conjoint(x)) -> therefore Conjoint(zenia) Conjoint(zenia) and forall x (Conjoint(x) -> Ligneous(x)) -> therefore Ligneous(zenia) Nappy(zenia) and Ligneous(zenia) and forall x (Nappy(x) and Ligneous(x) -> Sick(x)) -> therefore Sick(zenia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Malanie is xxix. Malanie is respectful. Malanie is snappy. Blondy is hulky. Blondy is subacute. Augustin is xxix. Augustin is bohemian. Augustin is respectful. Augustin is vulval. Augustin is snappy. If someone is subacute then they are vulval. Rough, snappy people are respectful. If someone is hulky and snappy then they are xxix. White, vulval people are hulky. If someone is hulky then they are respectful. All vulval people are snappy. Malanie is not vulval.", "logic": "\nXxix(malanie)\nRespectful(malanie)\nSnappy(malanie)\nHulky(blondy)\nSubacute(blondy)\nXxix(augustin)\nBohemian(augustin)\nRespectful(augustin)\nVulval(augustin)\nSnappy(augustin)\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Vulval(x))\nforall x (Vulval(x) and Snappy(x) -> Respectful(x))\nforall x (Hulky(x) and Snappy(x) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Snappy(x) and Vulval(x) -> Hulky(x))\nforall x (Hulky(x) -> Respectful(x))\nforall x (Vulval(x) -> Snappy(x))\n\nnot Vulval(malanie)\n\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Vulval(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Dorena is immobile. Dorena is stochastic. Dorena is monoclonal. Willis is asinine. Willis is sweptwing. Diann is immobile. Diann is impenitent. Diann is stochastic. Diann is dress. Diann is monoclonal. If someone is sweptwing then they are dress. Rough, monoclonal people are stochastic. If someone is asinine and monoclonal then they are immobile. White, dress people are asinine. If someone is asinine then they are stochastic. All dress people are monoclonal. Dorena is asinine.", "logic": "\nImmobile(dorena)\nStochastic(dorena)\nMonoclonal(dorena)\nAsinine(willis)\nSweptwing(willis)\nImmobile(diann)\nImpenitent(diann)\nStochastic(diann)\nDress(diann)\nMonoclonal(diann)\nforall x (Sweptwing(x) -> Dress(x))\nforall x (Dress(x) and Monoclonal(x) -> Stochastic(x))\nforall x (Asinine(x) and Monoclonal(x) -> Immobile(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and Dress(x) -> Asinine(x))\nforall x (Asinine(x) -> Stochastic(x))\nforall x (Dress(x) -> Monoclonal(x))\n\nAsinine(dorena)\n\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and Dress(x) -> Asinine(x)) <- forall x (Sweptwing(x) -> Dress(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Toni is benignant. Toni is ochre. Toni is berrylike. Zared is bigeminal. Zared is asexual. Zared is benignant. Zared is clownlike. Zared is ochre. Zared is hygienical. Zared is berrylike. If someone is asexual then they are hygienical. Rough, berrylike people are ochre. If someone is bigeminal and berrylike then they are benignant. White, hygienical people are bigeminal. If someone is bigeminal then they are ochre. All hygienical people are berrylike. Zared is not asexual.", "logic": "\nBenignant(toni)\nOchre(toni)\nBerrylike(toni)\nBigeminal(zared)\nAsexual(zared)\nBenignant(zared)\nClownlike(zared)\nOchre(zared)\nHygienical(zared)\nBerrylike(zared)\nforall x (Asexual(x) -> Hygienical(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) and Berrylike(x) -> Ochre(x))\nforall x (Bigeminal(x) and Berrylike(x) -> Benignant(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Bigeminal(x) -> Ochre(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) -> Berrylike(x))\n\nnot Asexual(zared)\n\nnot Asexual(zared) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Ophelia is unworldly. Ophelia is glaring. Ophelia is practiced. Patin is panicked. Patin is fickle. Alfie is unworldly. Alfie is eolithic. Alfie is glaring. Alfie is immodest. Alfie is practiced. If someone is fickle then they are immodest. Rough, practiced people are glaring. If someone is panicked and practiced then they are unworldly. White, immodest people are panicked. If someone is panicked then they are glaring. All immodest people are practiced. Patin is eolithic.", "logic": "\nUnworldly(ophelia)\nGlaring(ophelia)\nPracticed(ophelia)\nPanicked(patin)\nFickle(patin)\nUnworldly(alfie)\nEolithic(alfie)\nGlaring(alfie)\nImmodest(alfie)\nPracticed(alfie)\nforall x (Fickle(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Immodest(x) and Practiced(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) and Practiced(x) -> Unworldly(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) and Immodest(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Immodest(x) -> Practiced(x))\n\nEolithic(patin)\n\nEolithic(patin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Iain is restless. Iain is glaucous. Iain is elite. Germana is bubonic. Germana is dissident. Rosanna is restless. Rosanna is vaporous. Rosanna is glaucous. Rosanna is disrupted. Rosanna is elite. If someone is dissident then they are disrupted. Rough, elite people are glaucous. If someone is bubonic and elite then they are restless. White, disrupted people are bubonic. If someone is bubonic then they are glaucous. All disrupted people are elite. Iain is not vaporous.", "logic": "\nRestless(iain)\nGlaucous(iain)\nElite(iain)\nBubonic(germana)\nDissident(germana)\nRestless(rosanna)\nVaporous(rosanna)\nGlaucous(rosanna)\nDisrupted(rosanna)\nElite(rosanna)\nforall x (Dissident(x) -> Disrupted(x))\nforall x (Disrupted(x) and Elite(x) -> Glaucous(x))\nforall x (Bubonic(x) and Elite(x) -> Restless(x))\nforall x (Elite(x) and Disrupted(x) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Bubonic(x) -> Glaucous(x))\nforall x (Disrupted(x) -> Elite(x))\n\nnot Vaporous(iain)\n\nnot Vaporous(iain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Tessy is resiny. Tessy is overweight. Tessy is synoptic. Lilla is timid. Lilla is disjoined. Fara is resiny. Fara is cocky. Fara is overweight. Fara is lovely. Fara is synoptic. If someone is disjoined then they are lovely. Rough, synoptic people are overweight. If someone is timid and synoptic then they are resiny. White, lovely people are timid. If someone is timid then they are overweight. All lovely people are synoptic. Tessy is disjoined.", "logic": "\nResiny(tessy)\nOverweight(tessy)\nSynoptic(tessy)\nTimid(lilla)\nDisjoined(lilla)\nResiny(fara)\nCocky(fara)\nOverweight(fara)\nLovely(fara)\nSynoptic(fara)\nforall x (Disjoined(x) -> Lovely(x))\nforall x (Lovely(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Overweight(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and Lovely(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Overweight(x))\nforall x (Lovely(x) -> Synoptic(x))\n\nDisjoined(tessy)\n\nDisjoined(tessy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Inge is not seagoing. Aubine is monodical. Talia is proclaimed. All monodical things are prideful. All prideful things are exhausting. If something is prideful and not proclaimed then it is not monodical. All proclaimed things are monodical. If Aubine is prideful then Aubine is seagoing. All proclaimed, prideful things are ascendible. Aubine is monodical.", "logic": "\nnot Seagoing(inge)\nMonodical(aubine)\nProclaimed(talia)\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> Prideful(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) -> Exhausting(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) and not Proclaimed(x) -> not Monodical(x))\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) -> Monodical(x))\nPrideful(aubine) -> Seagoing(aubine)\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) and Prideful(x) -> Ascendible(x))\n\nMonodical(aubine)\n\ntherefore Monodical(aubine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Adelice is not specular. Katharina is anapestic. Ninetta is fatal. All anapestic things are shrimpy. All shrimpy things are apologetic. If something is shrimpy and not fatal then it is not anapestic. All fatal things are anapestic. If Katharina is shrimpy then Katharina is specular. All fatal, shrimpy things are fretful. Katharina is not anapestic.", "logic": "\nnot Specular(adelice)\nAnapestic(katharina)\nFatal(ninetta)\nforall x (Anapestic(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) and not Fatal(x) -> not Anapestic(x))\nforall x (Fatal(x) -> Anapestic(x))\nShrimpy(katharina) -> Specular(katharina)\nforall x (Fatal(x) and Shrimpy(x) -> Fretful(x))\n\nnot Anapestic(katharina)\n\ntherefore Anapestic(katharina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Martin is not myalgic. Kendre is famed. Isabel is vesicatory. All famed things are bouffant. All bouffant things are streaked. If something is bouffant and not vesicatory then it is not famed. All vesicatory things are famed. If Kendre is bouffant then Kendre is myalgic. All vesicatory, bouffant things are liberated. Kendre is bouffant.", "logic": "\nnot Myalgic(martin)\nFamed(kendre)\nVesicatory(isabel)\nforall x (Famed(x) -> Bouffant(x))\nforall x (Bouffant(x) -> Streaked(x))\nforall x (Bouffant(x) and not Vesicatory(x) -> not Famed(x))\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) -> Famed(x))\nBouffant(kendre) -> Myalgic(kendre)\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) and Bouffant(x) -> Liberated(x))\n\nBouffant(kendre)\n\nFamed(kendre) and forall x (Famed(x) -> Bouffant(x)) -> therefore Bouffant(kendre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Lucille is not encircled. Reta is sterling. Letti is fouled. All sterling things are copesettic. All copesettic things are littler. If something is copesettic and not fouled then it is not sterling. All fouled things are sterling. If Reta is copesettic then Reta is encircled. All fouled, copesettic things are aroid. Letti is not sterling.", "logic": "\nnot Encircled(lucille)\nSterling(reta)\nFouled(letti)\nforall x (Sterling(x) -> Copesettic(x))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Littler(x))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) and not Fouled(x) -> not Sterling(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) -> Sterling(x))\nCopesettic(reta) -> Encircled(reta)\nforall x (Fouled(x) and Copesettic(x) -> Aroid(x))\n\nnot Sterling(letti)\n\nFouled(letti) and forall x (Fouled(x) -> Sterling(x)) -> therefore Sterling(letti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Nicholle is not aluminous. Inessa is vibrionic. Solomon is detected. All vibrionic things are cropped. All cropped things are salaried. If something is cropped and not detected then it is not vibrionic. All detected things are vibrionic. If Inessa is cropped then Inessa is aluminous. All detected, cropped things are sultry. Inessa is salaried.", "logic": "\nnot Aluminous(nicholle)\nVibrionic(inessa)\nDetected(solomon)\nforall x (Vibrionic(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Cropped(x) -> Salaried(x))\nforall x (Cropped(x) and not Detected(x) -> not Vibrionic(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Vibrionic(x))\nCropped(inessa) -> Aluminous(inessa)\nforall x (Detected(x) and Cropped(x) -> Sultry(x))\n\nSalaried(inessa)\n\nVibrionic(inessa) and forall x (Vibrionic(x) -> Cropped(x)) -> therefore Cropped(inessa) Cropped(inessa) and forall x (Cropped(x) -> Salaried(x)) -> therefore Salaried(inessa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Fraser is not postexilic. Elton is swelled. Amalita is cystic. All swelled things are malapropos. All malapropos things are cavitied. If something is malapropos and not cystic then it is not swelled. All cystic things are swelled. If Elton is malapropos then Elton is postexilic. All cystic, malapropos things are bone. Elton is not postexilic.", "logic": "\nnot Postexilic(fraser)\nSwelled(elton)\nCystic(amalita)\nforall x (Swelled(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Malapropos(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Malapropos(x) and not Cystic(x) -> not Swelled(x))\nforall x (Cystic(x) -> Swelled(x))\nMalapropos(elton) -> Postexilic(elton)\nforall x (Cystic(x) and Malapropos(x) -> Bone(x))\n\nnot Postexilic(elton)\n\nSwelled(elton) and forall x (Swelled(x) -> Malapropos(x)) -> therefore Malapropos(elton) Malapropos(elton) and Malapropos(elton) -> Postexilic(elton) -> therefore Postexilic(elton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Delinda is not crustacean. Fayette is budding. Hamlen is pampering. All budding things are loosened. All loosened things are upfield. If something is loosened and not pampering then it is not budding. All pampering things are budding. If Fayette is loosened then Fayette is crustacean. All pampering, loosened things are tactless. Hamlen is upfield.", "logic": "\nnot Crustacean(delinda)\nBudding(fayette)\nPampering(hamlen)\nforall x (Budding(x) -> Loosened(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) -> Upfield(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) and not Pampering(x) -> not Budding(x))\nforall x (Pampering(x) -> Budding(x))\nLoosened(fayette) -> Crustacean(fayette)\nforall x (Pampering(x) and Loosened(x) -> Tactless(x))\n\nUpfield(hamlen)\n\nPampering(hamlen) and forall x (Pampering(x) -> Budding(x)) -> therefore Budding(hamlen) Budding(hamlen) and forall x (Budding(x) -> Loosened(x)) -> therefore Loosened(hamlen) Loosened(hamlen) and forall x (Loosened(x) -> Upfield(x)) -> therefore Upfield(hamlen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Reilly is not boisterous. Avis is writhen. Thibaut is burnable. All writhen things are utilized. All utilized things are greater. If something is utilized and not burnable then it is not writhen. All burnable things are writhen. If Avis is utilized then Avis is boisterous. All burnable, utilized things are precooled. Thibaut is not precooled.", "logic": "\nnot Boisterous(reilly)\nWrithen(avis)\nBurnable(thibaut)\nforall x (Writhen(x) -> Utilized(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) -> Greater(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) and not Burnable(x) -> not Writhen(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Writhen(x))\nUtilized(avis) -> Boisterous(avis)\nforall x (Burnable(x) and Utilized(x) -> Precooled(x))\n\nnot Precooled(thibaut)\n\nBurnable(thibaut) and forall x (Burnable(x) -> Writhen(x)) -> therefore Writhen(thibaut) Writhen(thibaut) and forall x (Writhen(x) -> Utilized(x)) -> therefore Utilized(thibaut) Burnable(thibaut) and Utilized(thibaut) and forall x (Burnable(x) and Utilized(x) -> Precooled(x)) -> therefore Precooled(thibaut)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Josee is not cinematic. Chev is foodless. Inigo is burked. All foodless things are rusty. All rusty things are aguish. If something is rusty and not burked then it is not foodless. All burked things are foodless. If Chev is rusty then Chev is cinematic. All burked, rusty things are spiky. Josee is not aguish.", "logic": "\nnot Cinematic(josee)\nFoodless(chev)\nBurked(inigo)\nforall x (Foodless(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Rusty(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Rusty(x) and not Burked(x) -> not Foodless(x))\nforall x (Burked(x) -> Foodless(x))\nRusty(chev) -> Cinematic(chev)\nforall x (Burked(x) and Rusty(x) -> Spiky(x))\n\nnot Aguish(josee)\n\nforall x (Rusty(x) -> Aguish(x)) <- forall x (Foodless(x) -> Rusty(x)) <- forall x (Burked(x) -> Foodless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Audy is not cumulative. Henryetta is ahorseback. Mace is snowy. All ahorseback things are binomial. All binomial things are effulgent. If something is binomial and not snowy then it is not ahorseback. All snowy things are ahorseback. If Henryetta is binomial then Henryetta is cumulative. All snowy, binomial things are unalloyed. Audy is ahorseback.", "logic": "\nnot Cumulative(audy)\nAhorseback(henryetta)\nSnowy(mace)\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> Binomial(x))\nforall x (Binomial(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Binomial(x) and not Snowy(x) -> not Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Snowy(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nBinomial(henryetta) -> Cumulative(henryetta)\nforall x (Snowy(x) and Binomial(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\n\nAhorseback(audy)\n\nforall x (Snowy(x) -> Ahorseback(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Esta is not humoral. Heddie is nodulose. Lucia is afflicted. All nodulose things are unclaimed. All unclaimed things are negroid. If something is unclaimed and not afflicted then it is not nodulose. All afflicted things are nodulose. If Heddie is unclaimed then Heddie is humoral. All afflicted, unclaimed things are feverish. Esta is not unclaimed.", "logic": "\nnot Humoral(esta)\nNodulose(heddie)\nAfflicted(lucia)\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) and not Afflicted(x) -> not Nodulose(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Nodulose(x))\nUnclaimed(heddie) -> Humoral(heddie)\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and Unclaimed(x) -> Feverish(x))\n\nnot Unclaimed(esta)\n\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Unclaimed(x)) <- forall x (Afflicted(x) -> Nodulose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Meaghan is not curly. Fania is unbridled. Bonni is idealised. All unbridled things are impeccant. All impeccant things are visaged. If something is impeccant and not idealised then it is not unbridled. All idealised things are unbridled. If Fania is impeccant then Fania is curly. All idealised, impeccant things are slashed. Fania is slashed.", "logic": "\nnot Curly(meaghan)\nUnbridled(fania)\nIdealised(bonni)\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Impeccant(x))\nforall x (Impeccant(x) -> Visaged(x))\nforall x (Impeccant(x) and not Idealised(x) -> not Unbridled(x))\nforall x (Idealised(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nImpeccant(fania) -> Curly(fania)\nforall x (Idealised(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Slashed(x))\n\nSlashed(fania)\n\nforall x (Idealised(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Slashed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Juergen is not antonymous. Corinna is unbranched. Sonnnie is lucent. All unbranched things are happy. All happy things are brasslike. If something is happy and not lucent then it is not unbranched. All lucent things are unbranched. If Corinna is happy then Corinna is antonymous. All lucent, happy things are airheaded. Corinna is not green.", "logic": "\nnot Antonymous(juergen)\nUnbranched(corinna)\nLucent(sonnnie)\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) -> Brasslike(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) and not Lucent(x) -> not Unbranched(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Unbranched(x))\nHappy(corinna) -> Antonymous(corinna)\nforall x (Lucent(x) and Happy(x) -> Airheaded(x))\n\nnot Green(corinna)\n\nnot Green(corinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Lionello is not maximal. Phillie is scandalous. Wendell is fulgid. All scandalous things are senecan. All senecan things are scummy. If something is senecan and not fulgid then it is not scandalous. All fulgid things are scandalous. If Phillie is senecan then Phillie is maximal. All fulgid, senecan things are well. Lionello is fulgid.", "logic": "\nnot Maximal(lionello)\nScandalous(phillie)\nFulgid(wendell)\nforall x (Scandalous(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Scummy(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) and not Fulgid(x) -> not Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) -> Scandalous(x))\nSenecan(phillie) -> Maximal(phillie)\nforall x (Fulgid(x) and Senecan(x) -> Well(x))\n\nFulgid(lionello)\n\nFulgid(lionello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Lindsey is not walloping. Genevra is welcome. Jennilee is cured. All welcome things are adsorbable. All adsorbable things are nosed. If something is adsorbable and not cured then it is not welcome. All cured things are welcome. If Genevra is adsorbable then Genevra is walloping. All cured, adsorbable things are ideational. Genevra is not cured.", "logic": "\nnot Walloping(lindsey)\nWelcome(genevra)\nCured(jennilee)\nforall x (Welcome(x) -> Adsorbable(x))\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) and not Cured(x) -> not Welcome(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) -> Welcome(x))\nAdsorbable(genevra) -> Walloping(genevra)\nforall x (Cured(x) and Adsorbable(x) -> Ideational(x))\n\nnot Cured(genevra)\n\nnot Cured(genevra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Hetty is not frankish. Sarette is acrogenous. Issy is laudatory. All acrogenous things are untoasted. All untoasted things are ignored. If something is untoasted and not laudatory then it is not acrogenous. All laudatory things are acrogenous. If Sarette is untoasted then Sarette is frankish. All laudatory, untoasted things are mayoral. Issy is green.", "logic": "\nnot Frankish(hetty)\nAcrogenous(sarette)\nLaudatory(issy)\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) and not Laudatory(x) -> not Acrogenous(x))\nforall x (Laudatory(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nUntoasted(sarette) -> Frankish(sarette)\nforall x (Laudatory(x) and Untoasted(x) -> Mayoral(x))\n\nGreen(issy)\n\nGreen(issy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Clemmie is monied. Renaldo is unwearying. Laurice is spiky. Talbot is forgivable. Green things are not unwearying. All bodied things are monied. If something is spiky and not unwearying then it is bodied. All bodied things are rousing. If something is unwearying and not monied then it is rousing. If something is unwearying and not bodied then it is shodden. Renaldo is unwearying.", "logic": "\nMonied(clemmie)\nUnwearying(renaldo)\nSpiky(laurice)\nForgivable(talbot)\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> not Unwearying(x))\nforall x (Bodied(x) -> Monied(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) and not Unwearying(x) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Bodied(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) and not Monied(x) -> Rousing(x))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) and not Bodied(x) -> Shodden(x))\n\nUnwearying(renaldo)\n\ntherefore Unwearying(renaldo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Maggie is superb. Isis is unspent. Thelma is czarist. Keene is aged. Green things are not unspent. All blithe things are superb. If something is czarist and not unspent then it is blithe. All blithe things are uncharted. If something is unspent and not superb then it is uncharted. If something is unspent and not blithe then it is adaptive. Keene is not aged.", "logic": "\nSuperb(maggie)\nUnspent(isis)\nCzarist(thelma)\nAged(keene)\nforall x (Czarist(x) -> not Unspent(x))\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Superb(x))\nforall x (Czarist(x) and not Unspent(x) -> Blithe(x))\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Uncharted(x))\nforall x (Unspent(x) and not Superb(x) -> Uncharted(x))\nforall x (Unspent(x) and not Blithe(x) -> Adaptive(x))\n\nnot Aged(keene)\n\ntherefore Aged(keene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Aliza is genoese. Terrye is asymmetric. Harriott is worldwide. Tish is aestival. Green things are not asymmetric. All impious things are genoese. If something is worldwide and not asymmetric then it is impious. All impious things are ultrasonic. If something is asymmetric and not genoese then it is ultrasonic. If something is asymmetric and not impious then it is ammoniated. Harriott is not asymmetric.", "logic": "\nGenoese(aliza)\nAsymmetric(terrye)\nWorldwide(harriott)\nAestival(tish)\nforall x (Worldwide(x) -> not Asymmetric(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Worldwide(x) and not Asymmetric(x) -> Impious(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) and not Genoese(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) and not Impious(x) -> Ammoniated(x))\n\nnot Asymmetric(harriott)\n\nWorldwide(harriott) and forall x (Worldwide(x) -> not Asymmetric(x)) -> therefore not Asymmetric(harriott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Ford is graceful. Lynda is northeast. Glory is unlabeled. Richardo is defendable. Green things are not northeast. All pemphigous things are graceful. If something is unlabeled and not northeast then it is pemphigous. All pemphigous things are vicarious. If something is northeast and not graceful then it is vicarious. If something is northeast and not pemphigous then it is eugenic. Glory is northeast.", "logic": "\nGraceful(ford)\nNortheast(lynda)\nUnlabeled(glory)\nDefendable(richardo)\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) -> not Northeast(x))\nforall x (Pemphigous(x) -> Graceful(x))\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) and not Northeast(x) -> Pemphigous(x))\nforall x (Pemphigous(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Northeast(x) and not Graceful(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Northeast(x) and not Pemphigous(x) -> Eugenic(x))\n\nNortheast(glory)\n\nUnlabeled(glory) and forall x (Unlabeled(x) -> not Northeast(x)) -> therefore not Northeast(glory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Stephana is rubbery. Cleland is outmoded. Rafaela is unfeminine. Ania is impure. Green things are not outmoded. All prepared things are rubbery. If something is unfeminine and not outmoded then it is prepared. All prepared things are mock. If something is outmoded and not rubbery then it is mock. If something is outmoded and not prepared then it is exempt. Rafaela is prepared.", "logic": "\nRubbery(stephana)\nOutmoded(cleland)\nUnfeminine(rafaela)\nImpure(ania)\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) -> not Outmoded(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and not Outmoded(x) -> Prepared(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Mock(x))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) and not Rubbery(x) -> Mock(x))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) and not Prepared(x) -> Exempt(x))\n\nPrepared(rafaela)\n\nUnfeminine(rafaela) and forall x (Unfeminine(x) -> not Outmoded(x)) -> therefore not Outmoded(rafaela) Unfeminine(rafaela) and not Outmoded(rafaela) and forall x (Unfeminine(x) and not Outmoded(x) -> Prepared(x)) -> therefore Prepared(rafaela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Menard is staggering. Florie is blended. Marty is onetime. Ahmad is unscripted. Green things are not blended. All embryotic things are staggering. If something is onetime and not blended then it is embryotic. All embryotic things are preemptive. If something is blended and not staggering then it is preemptive. If something is blended and not embryotic then it is extirpable. Marty is not embryotic.", "logic": "\nStaggering(menard)\nBlended(florie)\nOnetime(marty)\nUnscripted(ahmad)\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> not Blended(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Staggering(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) and not Blended(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Blended(x) and not Staggering(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Blended(x) and not Embryotic(x) -> Extirpable(x))\n\nnot Embryotic(marty)\n\nOnetime(marty) and forall x (Onetime(x) -> not Blended(x)) -> therefore not Blended(marty) Onetime(marty) and not Blended(marty) and forall x (Onetime(x) and not Blended(x) -> Embryotic(x)) -> therefore Embryotic(marty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Dela is lackluster. Annadiana is tomboyish. Annaliese is christly. Ezra is disfigured. Green things are not tomboyish. All stoned things are lackluster. If something is christly and not tomboyish then it is stoned. All stoned things are deft. If something is tomboyish and not lackluster then it is deft. If something is tomboyish and not stoned then it is boracic. Annaliese is lackluster.", "logic": "\nLackluster(dela)\nTomboyish(annadiana)\nChristly(annaliese)\nDisfigured(ezra)\nforall x (Christly(x) -> not Tomboyish(x))\nforall x (Stoned(x) -> Lackluster(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) and not Tomboyish(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Stoned(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and not Lackluster(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and not Stoned(x) -> Boracic(x))\n\nLackluster(annaliese)\n\nChristly(annaliese) and forall x (Christly(x) -> not Tomboyish(x)) -> therefore not Tomboyish(annaliese) Christly(annaliese) and not Tomboyish(annaliese) and forall x (Christly(x) and not Tomboyish(x) -> Stoned(x)) -> therefore Stoned(annaliese) Stoned(annaliese) and forall x (Stoned(x) -> Lackluster(x)) -> therefore Lackluster(annaliese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "France is combustive. Linell is meagre. Vivie is bibliotic. Marylou is infernal. Green things are not meagre. All actinal things are combustive. If something is bibliotic and not meagre then it is actinal. All actinal things are wriggly. If something is meagre and not combustive then it is wriggly. If something is meagre and not actinal then it is lendable. Vivie is not wriggly.", "logic": "\nCombustive(france)\nMeagre(linell)\nBibliotic(vivie)\nInfernal(marylou)\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) -> not Meagre(x))\nforall x (Actinal(x) -> Combustive(x))\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) and not Meagre(x) -> Actinal(x))\nforall x (Actinal(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Meagre(x) and not Combustive(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Meagre(x) and not Actinal(x) -> Lendable(x))\n\nnot Wriggly(vivie)\n\nBibliotic(vivie) and forall x (Bibliotic(x) -> not Meagre(x)) -> therefore not Meagre(vivie) Bibliotic(vivie) and not Meagre(vivie) and forall x (Bibliotic(x) and not Meagre(x) -> Actinal(x)) -> therefore Actinal(vivie) Actinal(vivie) and forall x (Actinal(x) -> Wriggly(x)) -> therefore Wriggly(vivie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Marna is delimited. Merrill is unmerited. Dory is blessed. Chan is masterly. Green things are not unmerited. All overloaded things are delimited. If something is blessed and not unmerited then it is overloaded. All overloaded things are afoot. If something is unmerited and not delimited then it is afoot. If something is unmerited and not overloaded then it is sacred. Merrill is not delimited.", "logic": "\nDelimited(marna)\nUnmerited(merrill)\nBlessed(dory)\nMasterly(chan)\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> not Unmerited(x))\nforall x (Overloaded(x) -> Delimited(x))\nforall x (Blessed(x) and not Unmerited(x) -> Overloaded(x))\nforall x (Overloaded(x) -> Afoot(x))\nforall x (Unmerited(x) and not Delimited(x) -> Afoot(x))\nforall x (Unmerited(x) and not Overloaded(x) -> Sacred(x))\n\nnot Delimited(merrill)\n\nforall x (Overloaded(x) -> Delimited(x)) <- forall x (Blessed(x) and not Unmerited(x) -> Overloaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Babara is obviating. Jessamyn is robustious. Maryann is kechuan. Zola is anchoritic. Green things are not robustious. All hindermost things are obviating. If something is kechuan and not robustious then it is hindermost. All hindermost things are beardown. If something is robustious and not obviating then it is beardown. If something is robustious and not hindermost then it is lacelike. Zola is lacelike.", "logic": "\nObviating(babara)\nRobustious(jessamyn)\nKechuan(maryann)\nAnchoritic(zola)\nforall x (Kechuan(x) -> not Robustious(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Kechuan(x) and not Robustious(x) -> Hindermost(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Beardown(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and not Obviating(x) -> Beardown(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and not Hindermost(x) -> Lacelike(x))\n\nLacelike(zola)\n\nforall x (Robustious(x) and not Hindermost(x) -> Lacelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Lenny is cuspated. Silvana is asymptotic. Justine is benthic. Minda is numeric. Green things are not asymptotic. All unpassable things are cuspated. If something is benthic and not asymptotic then it is unpassable. All unpassable things are pretend. If something is asymptotic and not cuspated then it is pretend. If something is asymptotic and not unpassable then it is reliant. Silvana is not reliant.", "logic": "\nCuspated(lenny)\nAsymptotic(silvana)\nBenthic(justine)\nNumeric(minda)\nforall x (Benthic(x) -> not Asymptotic(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Benthic(x) and not Asymptotic(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) and not Cuspated(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) and not Unpassable(x) -> Reliant(x))\n\nnot Reliant(silvana)\n\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) and not Unpassable(x) -> Reliant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Ginnifer is copesettic. Geri is nettled. Samuele is kept. Ula is pretended. Green things are not nettled. All undatable things are copesettic. If something is kept and not nettled then it is undatable. All undatable things are rear. If something is nettled and not copesettic then it is rear. If something is nettled and not undatable then it is following. Samuele is following.", "logic": "\nCopesettic(ginnifer)\nNettled(geri)\nKept(samuele)\nPretended(ula)\nforall x (Kept(x) -> not Nettled(x))\nforall x (Undatable(x) -> Copesettic(x))\nforall x (Kept(x) and not Nettled(x) -> Undatable(x))\nforall x (Undatable(x) -> Rear(x))\nforall x (Nettled(x) and not Copesettic(x) -> Rear(x))\nforall x (Nettled(x) and not Undatable(x) -> Following(x))\n\nFollowing(samuele)\n\nforall x (Nettled(x) and not Undatable(x) -> Following(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Starlin is separatist. Marjorie is buckram. Bert is synoptical. Inesita is diffuse. Green things are not buckram. All soupy things are separatist. If something is synoptical and not buckram then it is soupy. All soupy things are generative. If something is buckram and not separatist then it is generative. If something is buckram and not soupy then it is tyrolese. Starlin is not buckram.", "logic": "\nSeparatist(starlin)\nBuckram(marjorie)\nSynoptical(bert)\nDiffuse(inesita)\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> not Buckram(x))\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Synoptical(x) and not Buckram(x) -> Soupy(x))\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Buckram(x) and not Separatist(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Buckram(x) and not Soupy(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\n\nnot Buckram(starlin)\n\nnot Buckram(starlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Malory is viricidal. Neal is isometric. Joelie is ohmic. Cherry is saharan. Green things are not isometric. All astomatous things are viricidal. If something is ohmic and not isometric then it is astomatous. All astomatous things are mown. If something is isometric and not viricidal then it is mown. If something is isometric and not astomatous then it is corpulent. Neal is saharan.", "logic": "\nViricidal(malory)\nIsometric(neal)\nOhmic(joelie)\nSaharan(cherry)\nforall x (Ohmic(x) -> not Isometric(x))\nforall x (Astomatous(x) -> Viricidal(x))\nforall x (Ohmic(x) and not Isometric(x) -> Astomatous(x))\nforall x (Astomatous(x) -> Mown(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) and not Viricidal(x) -> Mown(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) and not Astomatous(x) -> Corpulent(x))\n\nSaharan(neal)\n\nSaharan(neal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Odette is smashed. Saunder is plumose. Lona is recessed. Ree is blear. Green things are not plumose. All shadowy things are smashed. If something is recessed and not plumose then it is shadowy. All shadowy things are postmortem. If something is plumose and not smashed then it is postmortem. If something is plumose and not shadowy then it is addible. Ree is not plumose.", "logic": "\nSmashed(odette)\nPlumose(saunder)\nRecessed(lona)\nBlear(ree)\nforall x (Recessed(x) -> not Plumose(x))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Smashed(x))\nforall x (Recessed(x) and not Plumose(x) -> Shadowy(x))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Postmortem(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and not Smashed(x) -> Postmortem(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and not Shadowy(x) -> Addible(x))\n\nnot Plumose(ree)\n\nnot Plumose(ree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Korrie is plural. Raychel is unverified. Jeffery is derived. Emeline is timbered. Green things are not unverified. All inner things are plural. If something is derived and not unverified then it is inner. All inner things are windy. If something is unverified and not plural then it is windy. If something is unverified and not inner then it is antarctic. Raychel is derived.", "logic": "\nPlural(korrie)\nUnverified(raychel)\nDerived(jeffery)\nTimbered(emeline)\nforall x (Derived(x) -> not Unverified(x))\nforall x (Inner(x) -> Plural(x))\nforall x (Derived(x) and not Unverified(x) -> Inner(x))\nforall x (Inner(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) and not Plural(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) and not Inner(x) -> Antarctic(x))\n\nDerived(raychel)\n\nDerived(raychel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "The waleed is bold. The waleed politick the herby. The waleed foil the herby. The moyra foil the waleed. The moyra foil the graham. The moyra is ingrained. The moyra is fattening. The moyra foil the waleed. The graham foil the moyra. The graham politick the waleed. The graham politick the herby. The herby is required. The herby is fattening. The herby politick the waleed. The herby politick the graham. If something is fattening and it foil the moyra then the moyra is ingrained. If the waleed is fattening and the waleed politick the moyra then the waleed foil the graham. If something is bold then it politick the waleed. If something is ingrained then it foil the graham. If something is fattening and it foil the moyra then the moyra foil the herby. If something foil the herby and it politick the waleed then the herby is ingrained. The waleed politick the herby.", "logic": "\nBold(waleed)\nPolitick(waleed, herby)\nFoil(waleed, herby)\nFoil(moyra, waleed)\nFoil(moyra, graham)\nIngrained(moyra)\nFattening(moyra)\nFoil(moyra, waleed)\nFoil(graham, moyra)\nPolitick(graham, waleed)\nPolitick(graham, herby)\nRequired(herby)\nFattening(herby)\nPolitick(herby, waleed)\nPolitick(herby, graham)\nforall x (Fattening(x) and Foil(x, moyra) -> Ingrained(moyra))\nFattening(waleed) and Politick(waleed, moyra) -> Foil(waleed, graham)\nforall x (Bold(x) -> Politick(x, waleed))\nforall x (Ingrained(x) -> Foil(x, graham))\nforall x (Fattening(x) and Foil(x, moyra) -> Foil(moyra, herby))\nforall x (Foil(x, herby) and Politick(x, waleed) -> Ingrained(herby))\n\nPolitick(waleed, herby)\n\ntherefore Politick(waleed, herby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The adolf is leased. The adolf caulk the anders. The adolf deliberate the anders. The bennet infix the adolf. The bennet infix the mia. The bennet is uncovered. The bennet is appetizing. The bennet deliberate the adolf. The mia infix the bennet. The mia caulk the adolf. The mia caulk the anders. The anders is shintoist. The anders is appetizing. The anders caulk the adolf. The anders caulk the mia. If something is appetizing and it infix the bennet then the bennet is uncovered. If the adolf is appetizing and the adolf caulk the bennet then the adolf infix the mia. If something is leased then it caulk the adolf. If something is uncovered then it infix the mia. If something is appetizing and it deliberate the bennet then the bennet infix the anders. If something deliberate the anders and it caulk the adolf then the anders is uncovered. The bennet does not eat the adolf.", "logic": "\nLeased(adolf)\nCaulk(adolf, anders)\nDeliberate(adolf, anders)\nInfix(bennet, adolf)\nInfix(bennet, mia)\nUncovered(bennet)\nAppetizing(bennet)\nDeliberate(bennet, adolf)\nInfix(mia, bennet)\nCaulk(mia, adolf)\nCaulk(mia, anders)\nShintoist(anders)\nAppetizing(anders)\nCaulk(anders, adolf)\nCaulk(anders, mia)\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and Infix(x, bennet) -> Uncovered(bennet))\nAppetizing(adolf) and Caulk(adolf, bennet) -> Infix(adolf, mia)\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Caulk(x, adolf))\nforall x (Uncovered(x) -> Infix(x, mia))\nforall x (Appetizing(x) and Deliberate(x, bennet) -> Infix(bennet, anders))\nforall x (Deliberate(x, anders) and Caulk(x, adolf) -> Uncovered(anders))\n\nnot Infix(bennet, adolf)\n\ntherefore Infix(bennet, adolf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The ernesta is harmful. The ernesta salve the kellsie. The ernesta boob the kellsie. The adah refresh the ernesta. The adah refresh the etta. The adah is screwy. The adah is versed. The adah boob the ernesta. The etta refresh the adah. The etta salve the ernesta. The etta salve the kellsie. The kellsie is luminous. The kellsie is versed. The kellsie salve the ernesta. The kellsie salve the etta. If something is versed and it refresh the adah then the adah is screwy. If the ernesta is versed and the ernesta salve the adah then the ernesta refresh the etta. If something is harmful then it salve the ernesta. If something is screwy then it refresh the etta. If something is versed and it boob the adah then the adah refresh the kellsie. If something boob the kellsie and it salve the ernesta then the kellsie is screwy. The ernesta salve the ernesta.", "logic": "\nHarmful(ernesta)\nSalve(ernesta, kellsie)\nBoob(ernesta, kellsie)\nRefresh(adah, ernesta)\nRefresh(adah, etta)\nScrewy(adah)\nVersed(adah)\nBoob(adah, ernesta)\nRefresh(etta, adah)\nSalve(etta, ernesta)\nSalve(etta, kellsie)\nLuminous(kellsie)\nVersed(kellsie)\nSalve(kellsie, ernesta)\nSalve(kellsie, etta)\nforall x (Versed(x) and Refresh(x, adah) -> Screwy(adah))\nVersed(ernesta) and Salve(ernesta, adah) -> Refresh(ernesta, etta)\nforall x (Harmful(x) -> Salve(x, ernesta))\nforall x (Screwy(x) -> Refresh(x, etta))\nforall x (Versed(x) and Boob(x, adah) -> Refresh(adah, kellsie))\nforall x (Boob(x, kellsie) and Salve(x, ernesta) -> Screwy(kellsie))\n\nSalve(ernesta, ernesta)\n\nHarmful(ernesta) and forall x (Harmful(x) -> Salve(x, ernesta)) -> therefore Salve(ernesta, ernesta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The judas is barbellate. The judas outvote the rowland. The judas acerbate the rowland. The marin craft the judas. The marin craft the genna. The marin is carbonic. The marin is carpellary. The marin acerbate the judas. The genna craft the marin. The genna outvote the judas. The genna outvote the rowland. The rowland is provable. The rowland is carpellary. The rowland outvote the judas. The rowland outvote the genna. If something is carpellary and it craft the marin then the marin is carbonic. If the judas is carpellary and the judas outvote the marin then the judas craft the genna. If something is barbellate then it outvote the judas. If something is carbonic then it craft the genna. If something is carpellary and it acerbate the marin then the marin craft the rowland. If something acerbate the rowland and it outvote the judas then the rowland is carbonic. The judas does not like the judas.", "logic": "\nBarbellate(judas)\nOutvote(judas, rowland)\nAcerbate(judas, rowland)\nCraft(marin, judas)\nCraft(marin, genna)\nCarbonic(marin)\nCarpellary(marin)\nAcerbate(marin, judas)\nCraft(genna, marin)\nOutvote(genna, judas)\nOutvote(genna, rowland)\nProvable(rowland)\nCarpellary(rowland)\nOutvote(rowland, judas)\nOutvote(rowland, genna)\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and Craft(x, marin) -> Carbonic(marin))\nCarpellary(judas) and Outvote(judas, marin) -> Craft(judas, genna)\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Outvote(x, judas))\nforall x (Carbonic(x) -> Craft(x, genna))\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and Acerbate(x, marin) -> Craft(marin, rowland))\nforall x (Acerbate(x, rowland) and Outvote(x, judas) -> Carbonic(rowland))\n\nnot Outvote(judas, judas)\n\nBarbellate(judas) and forall x (Barbellate(x) -> Outvote(x, judas)) -> therefore Outvote(judas, judas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The karisa is solemn. The karisa womanize the clemente. The karisa militarize the clemente. The joe commingle the karisa. The joe commingle the dominic. The joe is hmong. The joe is unmapped. The joe militarize the karisa. The dominic commingle the joe. The dominic womanize the karisa. The dominic womanize the clemente. The clemente is snakelike. The clemente is unmapped. The clemente womanize the karisa. The clemente womanize the dominic. If something is unmapped and it commingle the joe then the joe is hmong. If the karisa is unmapped and the karisa womanize the joe then the karisa commingle the dominic. If something is solemn then it womanize the karisa. If something is hmong then it commingle the dominic. If something is unmapped and it militarize the joe then the joe commingle the clemente. If something militarize the clemente and it womanize the karisa then the clemente is hmong. The clemente is hmong.", "logic": "\nSolemn(karisa)\nWomanize(karisa, clemente)\nMilitarize(karisa, clemente)\nCommingle(joe, karisa)\nCommingle(joe, dominic)\nHmong(joe)\nUnmapped(joe)\nMilitarize(joe, karisa)\nCommingle(dominic, joe)\nWomanize(dominic, karisa)\nWomanize(dominic, clemente)\nSnakelike(clemente)\nUnmapped(clemente)\nWomanize(clemente, karisa)\nWomanize(clemente, dominic)\nforall x (Unmapped(x) and Commingle(x, joe) -> Hmong(joe))\nUnmapped(karisa) and Womanize(karisa, joe) -> Commingle(karisa, dominic)\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Womanize(x, karisa))\nforall x (Hmong(x) -> Commingle(x, dominic))\nforall x (Unmapped(x) and Militarize(x, joe) -> Commingle(joe, clemente))\nforall x (Militarize(x, clemente) and Womanize(x, karisa) -> Hmong(clemente))\n\nHmong(clemente)\n\nSolemn(karisa) and forall x (Solemn(x) -> Womanize(x, karisa)) -> therefore Womanize(karisa, karisa) Militarize(karisa, clemente) and Womanize(karisa, karisa) and forall x (Militarize(x, clemente) and Womanize(x, karisa) -> Hmong(clemente)) -> therefore Hmong(clemente)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The milissent is illative. The milissent eulogize the rogers. The milissent address the rogers. The garrot ting the milissent. The garrot ting the doyle. The garrot is venturous. The garrot is eruptive. The garrot address the milissent. The doyle ting the garrot. The doyle eulogize the milissent. The doyle eulogize the rogers. The rogers is grayish. The rogers is eruptive. The rogers eulogize the milissent. The rogers eulogize the doyle. If something is eruptive and it ting the garrot then the garrot is venturous. If the milissent is eruptive and the milissent eulogize the garrot then the milissent ting the doyle. If something is illative then it eulogize the milissent. If something is venturous then it ting the doyle. If something is eruptive and it address the garrot then the garrot ting the rogers. If something address the rogers and it eulogize the milissent then the rogers is venturous. The rogers is not venturous.", "logic": "\nIllative(milissent)\nEulogize(milissent, rogers)\nAddress(milissent, rogers)\nTing(garrot, milissent)\nTing(garrot, doyle)\nVenturous(garrot)\nEruptive(garrot)\nAddress(garrot, milissent)\nTing(doyle, garrot)\nEulogize(doyle, milissent)\nEulogize(doyle, rogers)\nGrayish(rogers)\nEruptive(rogers)\nEulogize(rogers, milissent)\nEulogize(rogers, doyle)\nforall x (Eruptive(x) and Ting(x, garrot) -> Venturous(garrot))\nEruptive(milissent) and Eulogize(milissent, garrot) -> Ting(milissent, doyle)\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Eulogize(x, milissent))\nforall x (Venturous(x) -> Ting(x, doyle))\nforall x (Eruptive(x) and Address(x, garrot) -> Ting(garrot, rogers))\nforall x (Address(x, rogers) and Eulogize(x, milissent) -> Venturous(rogers))\n\nnot Venturous(rogers)\n\nIllative(milissent) and forall x (Illative(x) -> Eulogize(x, milissent)) -> therefore Eulogize(milissent, milissent) Address(milissent, rogers) and Eulogize(milissent, milissent) and forall x (Address(x, rogers) and Eulogize(x, milissent) -> Venturous(rogers)) -> therefore Venturous(rogers)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The eugenia is patched. The eugenia twiddle the cameron. The eugenia patinize the cameron. The lissie pursue the eugenia. The lissie pursue the aleks. The lissie is femoral. The lissie is satyrical. The lissie patinize the eugenia. The aleks pursue the lissie. The aleks twiddle the eugenia. The aleks twiddle the cameron. The cameron is acoustic. The cameron is satyrical. The cameron twiddle the eugenia. The cameron twiddle the aleks. If something is satyrical and it pursue the lissie then the lissie is femoral. If the eugenia is satyrical and the eugenia twiddle the lissie then the eugenia pursue the aleks. If something is patched then it twiddle the eugenia. If something is femoral then it pursue the aleks. If something is satyrical and it patinize the lissie then the lissie pursue the cameron. If something patinize the cameron and it twiddle the eugenia then the cameron is femoral. The cameron pursue the aleks.", "logic": "\nPatched(eugenia)\nTwiddle(eugenia, cameron)\nPatinize(eugenia, cameron)\nPursue(lissie, eugenia)\nPursue(lissie, aleks)\nFemoral(lissie)\nSatyrical(lissie)\nPatinize(lissie, eugenia)\nPursue(aleks, lissie)\nTwiddle(aleks, eugenia)\nTwiddle(aleks, cameron)\nAcoustic(cameron)\nSatyrical(cameron)\nTwiddle(cameron, eugenia)\nTwiddle(cameron, aleks)\nforall x (Satyrical(x) and Pursue(x, lissie) -> Femoral(lissie))\nSatyrical(eugenia) and Twiddle(eugenia, lissie) -> Pursue(eugenia, aleks)\nforall x (Patched(x) -> Twiddle(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Pursue(x, aleks))\nforall x (Satyrical(x) and Patinize(x, lissie) -> Pursue(lissie, cameron))\nforall x (Patinize(x, cameron) and Twiddle(x, eugenia) -> Femoral(cameron))\n\nPursue(cameron, aleks)\n\nPatched(eugenia) and forall x (Patched(x) -> Twiddle(x, eugenia)) -> therefore Twiddle(eugenia, eugenia) Patinize(eugenia, cameron) and Twiddle(eugenia, eugenia) and forall x (Patinize(x, cameron) and Twiddle(x, eugenia) -> Femoral(cameron)) -> therefore Femoral(cameron) Femoral(cameron) and forall x (Femoral(x) -> Pursue(x, aleks)) -> therefore Pursue(cameron, aleks)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The timothea is feminine. The timothea depress the tildie. The timothea confer the tildie. The modestine ripple the timothea. The modestine ripple the sashenka. The modestine is destitute. The modestine is faced. The modestine confer the timothea. The sashenka ripple the modestine. The sashenka depress the timothea. The sashenka depress the tildie. The tildie is discarded. The tildie is faced. The tildie depress the timothea. The tildie depress the sashenka. If something is faced and it ripple the modestine then the modestine is destitute. If the timothea is faced and the timothea depress the modestine then the timothea ripple the sashenka. If something is feminine then it depress the timothea. If something is destitute then it ripple the sashenka. If something is faced and it confer the modestine then the modestine ripple the tildie. If something confer the tildie and it depress the timothea then the tildie is destitute. The tildie does not eat the sashenka.", "logic": "\nFeminine(timothea)\nDepress(timothea, tildie)\nConfer(timothea, tildie)\nRipple(modestine, timothea)\nRipple(modestine, sashenka)\nDestitute(modestine)\nFaced(modestine)\nConfer(modestine, timothea)\nRipple(sashenka, modestine)\nDepress(sashenka, timothea)\nDepress(sashenka, tildie)\nDiscarded(tildie)\nFaced(tildie)\nDepress(tildie, timothea)\nDepress(tildie, sashenka)\nforall x (Faced(x) and Ripple(x, modestine) -> Destitute(modestine))\nFaced(timothea) and Depress(timothea, modestine) -> Ripple(timothea, sashenka)\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Depress(x, timothea))\nforall x (Destitute(x) -> Ripple(x, sashenka))\nforall x (Faced(x) and Confer(x, modestine) -> Ripple(modestine, tildie))\nforall x (Confer(x, tildie) and Depress(x, timothea) -> Destitute(tildie))\n\nnot Ripple(tildie, sashenka)\n\nFeminine(timothea) and forall x (Feminine(x) -> Depress(x, timothea)) -> therefore Depress(timothea, timothea) Confer(timothea, tildie) and Depress(timothea, timothea) and forall x (Confer(x, tildie) and Depress(x, timothea) -> Destitute(tildie)) -> therefore Destitute(tildie) Destitute(tildie) and forall x (Destitute(x) -> Ripple(x, sashenka)) -> therefore Ripple(tildie, sashenka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The terry is zoftig. The terry riffle the legra. The terry specify the legra. The valerie citrate the terry. The valerie citrate the vickie. The valerie is summative. The valerie is unitarian. The valerie specify the terry. The vickie citrate the valerie. The vickie riffle the terry. The vickie riffle the legra. The legra is popeyed. The legra is unitarian. The legra riffle the terry. The legra riffle the vickie. If something is unitarian and it citrate the valerie then the valerie is summative. If the terry is unitarian and the terry riffle the valerie then the terry citrate the vickie. If something is zoftig then it riffle the terry. If something is summative then it citrate the vickie. If something is unitarian and it specify the valerie then the valerie citrate the legra. If something specify the legra and it riffle the terry then the legra is summative. The terry does not eat the vickie.", "logic": "\nZoftig(terry)\nRiffle(terry, legra)\nSpecify(terry, legra)\nCitrate(valerie, terry)\nCitrate(valerie, vickie)\nSummative(valerie)\nUnitarian(valerie)\nSpecify(valerie, terry)\nCitrate(vickie, valerie)\nRiffle(vickie, terry)\nRiffle(vickie, legra)\nPopeyed(legra)\nUnitarian(legra)\nRiffle(legra, terry)\nRiffle(legra, vickie)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) and Citrate(x, valerie) -> Summative(valerie))\nUnitarian(terry) and Riffle(terry, valerie) -> Citrate(terry, vickie)\nforall x (Zoftig(x) -> Riffle(x, terry))\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Citrate(x, vickie))\nforall x (Unitarian(x) and Specify(x, valerie) -> Citrate(valerie, legra))\nforall x (Specify(x, legra) and Riffle(x, terry) -> Summative(legra))\n\nnot Citrate(terry, vickie)\n\nUnitarian(terry) and Riffle(terry, valerie) -> Citrate(terry, vickie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The sabina is confounded. The sabina combust the hagen. The sabina clock the hagen. The lissie refute the sabina. The lissie refute the adel. The lissie is listless. The lissie is trojan. The lissie clock the sabina. The adel refute the lissie. The adel combust the sabina. The adel combust the hagen. The hagen is rotational. The hagen is trojan. The hagen combust the sabina. The hagen combust the adel. If something is trojan and it refute the lissie then the lissie is listless. If the sabina is trojan and the sabina combust the lissie then the sabina refute the adel. If something is confounded then it combust the sabina. If something is listless then it refute the adel. If something is trojan and it clock the lissie then the lissie refute the hagen. If something clock the hagen and it combust the sabina then the hagen is listless. The lissie refute the hagen.", "logic": "\nConfounded(sabina)\nCombust(sabina, hagen)\nClock(sabina, hagen)\nRefute(lissie, sabina)\nRefute(lissie, adel)\nListless(lissie)\nTrojan(lissie)\nClock(lissie, sabina)\nRefute(adel, lissie)\nCombust(adel, sabina)\nCombust(adel, hagen)\nRotational(hagen)\nTrojan(hagen)\nCombust(hagen, sabina)\nCombust(hagen, adel)\nforall x (Trojan(x) and Refute(x, lissie) -> Listless(lissie))\nTrojan(sabina) and Combust(sabina, lissie) -> Refute(sabina, adel)\nforall x (Confounded(x) -> Combust(x, sabina))\nforall x (Listless(x) -> Refute(x, adel))\nforall x (Trojan(x) and Clock(x, lissie) -> Refute(lissie, hagen))\nforall x (Clock(x, hagen) and Combust(x, sabina) -> Listless(hagen))\n\nRefute(lissie, hagen)\n\nforall x (Trojan(x) and Clock(x, lissie) -> Refute(lissie, hagen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The warren is moody. The warren molest the andrus. The warren jampack the andrus. The elbertina bestride the warren. The elbertina bestride the daria. The elbertina is unswerving. The elbertina is snug. The elbertina jampack the warren. The daria bestride the elbertina. The daria molest the warren. The daria molest the andrus. The andrus is healthful. The andrus is snug. The andrus molest the warren. The andrus molest the daria. If something is snug and it bestride the elbertina then the elbertina is unswerving. If the warren is snug and the warren molest the elbertina then the warren bestride the daria. If something is moody then it molest the warren. If something is unswerving then it bestride the daria. If something is snug and it jampack the elbertina then the elbertina bestride the andrus. If something jampack the andrus and it molest the warren then the andrus is unswerving. The elbertina does not like the warren.", "logic": "\nMoody(warren)\nMolest(warren, andrus)\nJampack(warren, andrus)\nBestride(elbertina, warren)\nBestride(elbertina, daria)\nUnswerving(elbertina)\nSnug(elbertina)\nJampack(elbertina, warren)\nBestride(daria, elbertina)\nMolest(daria, warren)\nMolest(daria, andrus)\nHealthful(andrus)\nSnug(andrus)\nMolest(andrus, warren)\nMolest(andrus, daria)\nforall x (Snug(x) and Bestride(x, elbertina) -> Unswerving(elbertina))\nSnug(warren) and Molest(warren, elbertina) -> Bestride(warren, daria)\nforall x (Moody(x) -> Molest(x, warren))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) -> Bestride(x, daria))\nforall x (Snug(x) and Jampack(x, elbertina) -> Bestride(elbertina, andrus))\nforall x (Jampack(x, andrus) and Molest(x, warren) -> Unswerving(andrus))\n\nnot Molest(elbertina, warren)\n\nforall x (Moody(x) -> Molest(x, warren)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The ofelia is conelike. The ofelia resuspend the eveline. The ofelia pass the eveline. The camellia girth the ofelia. The camellia girth the sosanna. The camellia is pebbly. The camellia is rheologic. The camellia pass the ofelia. The sosanna girth the camellia. The sosanna resuspend the ofelia. The sosanna resuspend the eveline. The eveline is subsidiary. The eveline is rheologic. The eveline resuspend the ofelia. The eveline resuspend the sosanna. If something is rheologic and it girth the camellia then the camellia is pebbly. If the ofelia is rheologic and the ofelia resuspend the camellia then the ofelia girth the sosanna. If something is conelike then it resuspend the ofelia. If something is pebbly then it girth the sosanna. If something is rheologic and it pass the camellia then the camellia girth the eveline. If something pass the eveline and it resuspend the ofelia then the eveline is pebbly. The sosanna girth the sosanna.", "logic": "\nConelike(ofelia)\nResuspend(ofelia, eveline)\nPass(ofelia, eveline)\nGirth(camellia, ofelia)\nGirth(camellia, sosanna)\nPebbly(camellia)\nRheologic(camellia)\nPass(camellia, ofelia)\nGirth(sosanna, camellia)\nResuspend(sosanna, ofelia)\nResuspend(sosanna, eveline)\nSubsidiary(eveline)\nRheologic(eveline)\nResuspend(eveline, ofelia)\nResuspend(eveline, sosanna)\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Girth(x, camellia) -> Pebbly(camellia))\nRheologic(ofelia) and Resuspend(ofelia, camellia) -> Girth(ofelia, sosanna)\nforall x (Conelike(x) -> Resuspend(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) -> Girth(x, sosanna))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Pass(x, camellia) -> Girth(camellia, eveline))\nforall x (Pass(x, eveline) and Resuspend(x, ofelia) -> Pebbly(eveline))\n\nGirth(sosanna, sosanna)\n\nforall x (Pebbly(x) -> Girth(x, sosanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The hubert is made. The hubert concert the roxane. The hubert stipple the roxane. The petrina proofread the hubert. The petrina proofread the skylar. The petrina is squawky. The petrina is unsweet. The petrina stipple the hubert. The skylar proofread the petrina. The skylar concert the hubert. The skylar concert the roxane. The roxane is irritable. The roxane is unsweet. The roxane concert the hubert. The roxane concert the skylar. If something is unsweet and it proofread the petrina then the petrina is squawky. If the hubert is unsweet and the hubert concert the petrina then the hubert proofread the skylar. If something is made then it concert the hubert. If something is squawky then it proofread the skylar. If something is unsweet and it stipple the petrina then the petrina proofread the roxane. If something stipple the roxane and it concert the hubert then the roxane is squawky. The roxane is not nice.", "logic": "\nMade(hubert)\nConcert(hubert, roxane)\nStipple(hubert, roxane)\nProofread(petrina, hubert)\nProofread(petrina, skylar)\nSquawky(petrina)\nUnsweet(petrina)\nStipple(petrina, hubert)\nProofread(skylar, petrina)\nConcert(skylar, hubert)\nConcert(skylar, roxane)\nIrritable(roxane)\nUnsweet(roxane)\nConcert(roxane, hubert)\nConcert(roxane, skylar)\nforall x (Unsweet(x) and Proofread(x, petrina) -> Squawky(petrina))\nUnsweet(hubert) and Concert(hubert, petrina) -> Proofread(hubert, skylar)\nforall x (Made(x) -> Concert(x, hubert))\nforall x (Squawky(x) -> Proofread(x, skylar))\nforall x (Unsweet(x) and Stipple(x, petrina) -> Proofread(petrina, roxane))\nforall x (Stipple(x, roxane) and Concert(x, hubert) -> Squawky(roxane))\n\nnot Nice(roxane)\n\nnot Nice(roxane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The corie is loath. The corie solo the elizabeth. The corie robe the elizabeth. The arlee carol the corie. The arlee carol the viviene. The arlee is seedless. The arlee is raining. The arlee robe the corie. The viviene carol the arlee. The viviene solo the corie. The viviene solo the elizabeth. The elizabeth is tahitian. The elizabeth is raining. The elizabeth solo the corie. The elizabeth solo the viviene. If something is raining and it carol the arlee then the arlee is seedless. If the corie is raining and the corie solo the arlee then the corie carol the viviene. If something is loath then it solo the corie. If something is seedless then it carol the viviene. If something is raining and it robe the arlee then the arlee carol the elizabeth. If something robe the elizabeth and it solo the corie then the elizabeth is seedless. The arlee robe the viviene.", "logic": "\nLoath(corie)\nSolo(corie, elizabeth)\nRobe(corie, elizabeth)\nCarol(arlee, corie)\nCarol(arlee, viviene)\nSeedless(arlee)\nRaining(arlee)\nRobe(arlee, corie)\nCarol(viviene, arlee)\nSolo(viviene, corie)\nSolo(viviene, elizabeth)\nTahitian(elizabeth)\nRaining(elizabeth)\nSolo(elizabeth, corie)\nSolo(elizabeth, viviene)\nforall x (Raining(x) and Carol(x, arlee) -> Seedless(arlee))\nRaining(corie) and Solo(corie, arlee) -> Carol(corie, viviene)\nforall x (Loath(x) -> Solo(x, corie))\nforall x (Seedless(x) -> Carol(x, viviene))\nforall x (Raining(x) and Robe(x, arlee) -> Carol(arlee, elizabeth))\nforall x (Robe(x, elizabeth) and Solo(x, corie) -> Seedless(elizabeth))\n\nRobe(arlee, viviene)\n\nRobe(arlee, viviene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The viviene is knockabout. The viviene isolate the andrea. The viviene plant the andrea. The kandy whizz the viviene. The kandy whizz the inga. The kandy is hindi. The kandy is satiated. The kandy plant the viviene. The inga whizz the kandy. The inga isolate the viviene. The inga isolate the andrea. The andrea is damaged. The andrea is satiated. The andrea isolate the viviene. The andrea isolate the inga. If something is satiated and it whizz the kandy then the kandy is hindi. If the viviene is satiated and the viviene isolate the kandy then the viviene whizz the inga. If something is knockabout then it isolate the viviene. If something is hindi then it whizz the inga. If something is satiated and it plant the kandy then the kandy whizz the andrea. If something plant the andrea and it isolate the viviene then the andrea is hindi. The inga does not like the inga.", "logic": "\nKnockabout(viviene)\nIsolate(viviene, andrea)\nPlant(viviene, andrea)\nWhizz(kandy, viviene)\nWhizz(kandy, inga)\nHindi(kandy)\nSatiated(kandy)\nPlant(kandy, viviene)\nWhizz(inga, kandy)\nIsolate(inga, viviene)\nIsolate(inga, andrea)\nDamaged(andrea)\nSatiated(andrea)\nIsolate(andrea, viviene)\nIsolate(andrea, inga)\nforall x (Satiated(x) and Whizz(x, kandy) -> Hindi(kandy))\nSatiated(viviene) and Isolate(viviene, kandy) -> Whizz(viviene, inga)\nforall x (Knockabout(x) -> Isolate(x, viviene))\nforall x (Hindi(x) -> Whizz(x, inga))\nforall x (Satiated(x) and Plant(x, kandy) -> Whizz(kandy, andrea))\nforall x (Plant(x, andrea) and Isolate(x, viviene) -> Hindi(andrea))\n\nnot Isolate(inga, inga)\n\nnot Isolate(inga, inga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The dalila is orange. The dalila reef the ingaberg. The dalila pencil the ingaberg. The phillis race the dalila. The phillis race the mohamad. The phillis is palatial. The phillis is xviii. The phillis pencil the dalila. The mohamad race the phillis. The mohamad reef the dalila. The mohamad reef the ingaberg. The ingaberg is quack. The ingaberg is xviii. The ingaberg reef the dalila. The ingaberg reef the mohamad. If something is xviii and it race the phillis then the phillis is palatial. If the dalila is xviii and the dalila reef the phillis then the dalila race the mohamad. If something is orange then it reef the dalila. If something is palatial then it race the mohamad. If something is xviii and it pencil the phillis then the phillis race the ingaberg. If something pencil the ingaberg and it reef the dalila then the ingaberg is palatial. The mohamad is orange.", "logic": "\nOrange(dalila)\nReef(dalila, ingaberg)\nPencil(dalila, ingaberg)\nRace(phillis, dalila)\nRace(phillis, mohamad)\nPalatial(phillis)\nXviii(phillis)\nPencil(phillis, dalila)\nRace(mohamad, phillis)\nReef(mohamad, dalila)\nReef(mohamad, ingaberg)\nQuack(ingaberg)\nXviii(ingaberg)\nReef(ingaberg, dalila)\nReef(ingaberg, mohamad)\nforall x (Xviii(x) and Race(x, phillis) -> Palatial(phillis))\nXviii(dalila) and Reef(dalila, phillis) -> Race(dalila, mohamad)\nforall x (Orange(x) -> Reef(x, dalila))\nforall x (Palatial(x) -> Race(x, mohamad))\nforall x (Xviii(x) and Pencil(x, phillis) -> Race(phillis, ingaberg))\nforall x (Pencil(x, ingaberg) and Reef(x, dalila) -> Palatial(ingaberg))\n\nOrange(mohamad)\n\nOrange(mohamad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "Queenie is assiduous. Queenie is unaltered. Delilah is assiduous. Delilah is exploitive. Delilah is intrepid. Thaddeus is unaltered. Thaddeus is tittering. Thaddeus is inconstant. Teodorico is intrepid. Teodorico is fossil. Furry people are unaltered. If Teodorico is intrepid then Teodorico is exploitive. All assiduous people are exploitive. Kind people are fossil. If someone is unaltered and inconstant then they are intrepid. All assiduous, exploitive people are inconstant. If someone is exploitive and fossil then they are intrepid. All unaltered, tittering people are fossil. Queenie is assiduous.", "logic": "\nAssiduous(queenie)\nUnaltered(queenie)\nAssiduous(delilah)\nExploitive(delilah)\nIntrepid(delilah)\nUnaltered(thaddeus)\nTittering(thaddeus)\nInconstant(thaddeus)\nIntrepid(teodorico)\nFossil(teodorico)\nforall x (Tittering(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nIntrepid(teodorico) -> Exploitive(teodorico)\nforall x (Assiduous(x) -> Exploitive(x))\nforall x (Exploitive(x) -> Fossil(x))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) and Inconstant(x) -> Intrepid(x))\nforall x (Assiduous(x) and Exploitive(x) -> Inconstant(x))\nforall x (Exploitive(x) and Fossil(x) -> Intrepid(x))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) and Tittering(x) -> Fossil(x))\n\nAssiduous(queenie)\n\ntherefore Assiduous(queenie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Leonhard is noduled. Leonhard is variegated. Vivianne is noduled. Vivianne is vertebrate. Vivianne is idealistic. Dwain is variegated. Dwain is stifled. Dwain is shambolic. Clemente is idealistic. Clemente is shabby. Furry people are variegated. If Clemente is idealistic then Clemente is vertebrate. All noduled people are vertebrate. Kind people are shabby. If someone is variegated and shambolic then they are idealistic. All noduled, vertebrate people are shambolic. If someone is vertebrate and shabby then they are idealistic. All variegated, stifled people are shabby. Leonhard is not variegated.", "logic": "\nNoduled(leonhard)\nVariegated(leonhard)\nNoduled(vivianne)\nVertebrate(vivianne)\nIdealistic(vivianne)\nVariegated(dwain)\nStifled(dwain)\nShambolic(dwain)\nIdealistic(clemente)\nShabby(clemente)\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Variegated(x))\nIdealistic(clemente) -> Vertebrate(clemente)\nforall x (Noduled(x) -> Vertebrate(x))\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Shambolic(x) -> Idealistic(x))\nforall x (Noduled(x) and Vertebrate(x) -> Shambolic(x))\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) and Shabby(x) -> Idealistic(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Stifled(x) -> Shabby(x))\n\nnot Variegated(leonhard)\n\ntherefore Variegated(leonhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Robinia is ribbed. Robinia is overgreedy. Rollins is ribbed. Rollins is foolish. Rollins is thrilled. Portia is overgreedy. Portia is uncool. Portia is disabled. Alfreda is thrilled. Alfreda is abomasal. Furry people are overgreedy. If Alfreda is thrilled then Alfreda is foolish. All ribbed people are foolish. Kind people are abomasal. If someone is overgreedy and disabled then they are thrilled. All ribbed, foolish people are disabled. If someone is foolish and abomasal then they are thrilled. All overgreedy, uncool people are abomasal. Alfreda is foolish.", "logic": "\nRibbed(robinia)\nOvergreedy(robinia)\nRibbed(rollins)\nFoolish(rollins)\nThrilled(rollins)\nOvergreedy(portia)\nUncool(portia)\nDisabled(portia)\nThrilled(alfreda)\nAbomasal(alfreda)\nforall x (Uncool(x) -> Overgreedy(x))\nThrilled(alfreda) -> Foolish(alfreda)\nforall x (Ribbed(x) -> Foolish(x))\nforall x (Foolish(x) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) and Disabled(x) -> Thrilled(x))\nforall x (Ribbed(x) and Foolish(x) -> Disabled(x))\nforall x (Foolish(x) and Abomasal(x) -> Thrilled(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) and Uncool(x) -> Abomasal(x))\n\nFoolish(alfreda)\n\nThrilled(alfreda) and Thrilled(alfreda) -> Foolish(alfreda) -> therefore Foolish(alfreda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Tobi is papistic. Tobi is jarring. Alister is papistic. Alister is xxix. Alister is unsigned. Freddy is jarring. Freddy is star. Freddy is yonder. Jayme is unsigned. Jayme is titular. Furry people are jarring. If Jayme is unsigned then Jayme is xxix. All papistic people are xxix. Kind people are titular. If someone is jarring and yonder then they are unsigned. All papistic, xxix people are yonder. If someone is xxix and titular then they are unsigned. All jarring, star people are titular. Tobi is not xxix.", "logic": "\nPapistic(tobi)\nJarring(tobi)\nPapistic(alister)\nXxix(alister)\nUnsigned(alister)\nJarring(freddy)\nStar(freddy)\nYonder(freddy)\nUnsigned(jayme)\nTitular(jayme)\nforall x (Star(x) -> Jarring(x))\nUnsigned(jayme) -> Xxix(jayme)\nforall x (Papistic(x) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Xxix(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Jarring(x) and Yonder(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Papistic(x) and Xxix(x) -> Yonder(x))\nforall x (Xxix(x) and Titular(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Jarring(x) and Star(x) -> Titular(x))\n\nnot Xxix(tobi)\n\nPapistic(tobi) and forall x (Papistic(x) -> Xxix(x)) -> therefore Xxix(tobi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Sib is suckled. Sib is argent. Eulalie is suckled. Eulalie is utter. Eulalie is unworthy. Christ is argent. Christ is observable. Christ is racking. Dell is unworthy. Dell is seaborne. Furry people are argent. If Dell is unworthy then Dell is utter. All suckled people are utter. Kind people are seaborne. If someone is argent and racking then they are unworthy. All suckled, utter people are racking. If someone is utter and seaborne then they are unworthy. All argent, observable people are seaborne. Sib is seaborne.", "logic": "\nSuckled(sib)\nArgent(sib)\nSuckled(eulalie)\nUtter(eulalie)\nUnworthy(eulalie)\nArgent(christ)\nObservable(christ)\nRacking(christ)\nUnworthy(dell)\nSeaborne(dell)\nforall x (Observable(x) -> Argent(x))\nUnworthy(dell) -> Utter(dell)\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> Utter(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) -> Seaborne(x))\nforall x (Argent(x) and Racking(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) and Utter(x) -> Racking(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) and Seaborne(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nforall x (Argent(x) and Observable(x) -> Seaborne(x))\n\nSeaborne(sib)\n\nSuckled(sib) and forall x (Suckled(x) -> Utter(x)) -> therefore Utter(sib) Utter(sib) and forall x (Utter(x) -> Seaborne(x)) -> therefore Seaborne(sib)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Perle is liturgical. Perle is ninefold. Cybal is liturgical. Cybal is surpassing. Cybal is definite. Marcel is ninefold. Marcel is suppliant. Marcel is manful. Toinette is definite. Toinette is honey. Furry people are ninefold. If Toinette is definite then Toinette is surpassing. All liturgical people are surpassing. Kind people are honey. If someone is ninefold and manful then they are definite. All liturgical, surpassing people are manful. If someone is surpassing and honey then they are definite. All ninefold, suppliant people are honey. Perle is not manful.", "logic": "\nLiturgical(perle)\nNinefold(perle)\nLiturgical(cybal)\nSurpassing(cybal)\nDefinite(cybal)\nNinefold(marcel)\nSuppliant(marcel)\nManful(marcel)\nDefinite(toinette)\nHoney(toinette)\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nDefinite(toinette) -> Surpassing(toinette)\nforall x (Liturgical(x) -> Surpassing(x))\nforall x (Surpassing(x) -> Honey(x))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Manful(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) and Surpassing(x) -> Manful(x))\nforall x (Surpassing(x) and Honey(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Suppliant(x) -> Honey(x))\n\nnot Manful(perle)\n\nLiturgical(perle) and forall x (Liturgical(x) -> Surpassing(x)) -> therefore Surpassing(perle) Liturgical(perle) and Surpassing(perle) and forall x (Liturgical(x) and Surpassing(x) -> Manful(x)) -> therefore Manful(perle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Shina is regardant. Shina is deafened. Sanford is regardant. Sanford is loose. Sanford is ecuadorian. Star is deafened. Star is graceless. Star is thirtieth. Filia is ecuadorian. Filia is common. Furry people are deafened. If Filia is ecuadorian then Filia is loose. All regardant people are loose. Kind people are common. If someone is deafened and thirtieth then they are ecuadorian. All regardant, loose people are thirtieth. If someone is loose and common then they are ecuadorian. All deafened, graceless people are common. Shina is ecuadorian.", "logic": "\nRegardant(shina)\nDeafened(shina)\nRegardant(sanford)\nLoose(sanford)\nEcuadorian(sanford)\nDeafened(star)\nGraceless(star)\nThirtieth(star)\nEcuadorian(filia)\nCommon(filia)\nforall x (Graceless(x) -> Deafened(x))\nEcuadorian(filia) -> Loose(filia)\nforall x (Regardant(x) -> Loose(x))\nforall x (Loose(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Deafened(x) and Thirtieth(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\nforall x (Regardant(x) and Loose(x) -> Thirtieth(x))\nforall x (Loose(x) and Common(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\nforall x (Deafened(x) and Graceless(x) -> Common(x))\n\nEcuadorian(shina)\n\nRegardant(shina) and forall x (Regardant(x) -> Loose(x)) -> therefore Loose(shina) Regardant(shina) and Loose(shina) and forall x (Regardant(x) and Loose(x) -> Thirtieth(x)) -> therefore Thirtieth(shina) Deafened(shina) and Thirtieth(shina) and forall x (Deafened(x) and Thirtieth(x) -> Ecuadorian(x)) -> therefore Ecuadorian(shina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Elliott is ravaged. Elliott is centered. Almeta is ravaged. Almeta is hiemal. Almeta is cataclinal. Row is centered. Row is virgin. Row is packable. Enrica is cataclinal. Enrica is precedent. Furry people are centered. If Enrica is cataclinal then Enrica is hiemal. All ravaged people are hiemal. Kind people are precedent. If someone is centered and packable then they are cataclinal. All ravaged, hiemal people are packable. If someone is hiemal and precedent then they are cataclinal. All centered, virgin people are precedent. Elliott is not cataclinal.", "logic": "\nRavaged(elliott)\nCentered(elliott)\nRavaged(almeta)\nHiemal(almeta)\nCataclinal(almeta)\nCentered(row)\nVirgin(row)\nPackable(row)\nCataclinal(enrica)\nPrecedent(enrica)\nforall x (Virgin(x) -> Centered(x))\nCataclinal(enrica) -> Hiemal(enrica)\nforall x (Ravaged(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Precedent(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) and Packable(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Ravaged(x) and Hiemal(x) -> Packable(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) and Precedent(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) and Virgin(x) -> Precedent(x))\n\nnot Cataclinal(elliott)\n\nRavaged(elliott) and forall x (Ravaged(x) -> Hiemal(x)) -> therefore Hiemal(elliott) Ravaged(elliott) and Hiemal(elliott) and forall x (Ravaged(x) and Hiemal(x) -> Packable(x)) -> therefore Packable(elliott) Centered(elliott) and Packable(elliott) and forall x (Centered(x) and Packable(x) -> Cataclinal(x)) -> therefore Cataclinal(elliott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Darrin is spic. Darrin is eerie. Gibb is spic. Gibb is swaggering. Gibb is orangish. Lorianne is eerie. Lorianne is croaky. Lorianne is unstinted. Clemens is orangish. Clemens is allometric. Furry people are eerie. If Clemens is orangish then Clemens is swaggering. All spic people are swaggering. Kind people are allometric. If someone is eerie and unstinted then they are orangish. All spic, swaggering people are unstinted. If someone is swaggering and allometric then they are orangish. All eerie, croaky people are allometric. Lorianne is not swaggering.", "logic": "\nSpic(darrin)\nEerie(darrin)\nSpic(gibb)\nSwaggering(gibb)\nOrangish(gibb)\nEerie(lorianne)\nCroaky(lorianne)\nUnstinted(lorianne)\nOrangish(clemens)\nAllometric(clemens)\nforall x (Croaky(x) -> Eerie(x))\nOrangish(clemens) -> Swaggering(clemens)\nforall x (Spic(x) -> Swaggering(x))\nforall x (Swaggering(x) -> Allometric(x))\nforall x (Eerie(x) and Unstinted(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Spic(x) and Swaggering(x) -> Unstinted(x))\nforall x (Swaggering(x) and Allometric(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Eerie(x) and Croaky(x) -> Allometric(x))\n\nnot Swaggering(lorianne)\n\nforall x (Spic(x) -> Swaggering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Gerhard is jocund. Gerhard is sporadic. Jeni is jocund. Jeni is resistless. Jeni is hassidic. Jordain is sporadic. Jordain is educated. Jordain is hazardous. Eustacia is hassidic. Eustacia is haemic. Furry people are sporadic. If Eustacia is hassidic then Eustacia is resistless. All jocund people are resistless. Kind people are haemic. If someone is sporadic and hazardous then they are hassidic. All jocund, resistless people are hazardous. If someone is resistless and haemic then they are hassidic. All sporadic, educated people are haemic. Jeni is sporadic.", "logic": "\nJocund(gerhard)\nSporadic(gerhard)\nJocund(jeni)\nResistless(jeni)\nHassidic(jeni)\nSporadic(jordain)\nEducated(jordain)\nHazardous(jordain)\nHassidic(eustacia)\nHaemic(eustacia)\nforall x (Educated(x) -> Sporadic(x))\nHassidic(eustacia) -> Resistless(eustacia)\nforall x (Jocund(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) and Hazardous(x) -> Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) and Resistless(x) -> Hazardous(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) and Haemic(x) -> Hassidic(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) and Educated(x) -> Haemic(x))\n\nSporadic(jeni)\n\nforall x (Educated(x) -> Sporadic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Win is diestrual. Win is isotropic. Baily is diestrual. Baily is cyclonal. Baily is southmost. Sharia is isotropic. Sharia is slumbrous. Sharia is proved. Amalita is southmost. Amalita is analyzed. Furry people are isotropic. If Amalita is southmost then Amalita is cyclonal. All diestrual people are cyclonal. Kind people are analyzed. If someone is isotropic and proved then they are southmost. All diestrual, cyclonal people are proved. If someone is cyclonal and analyzed then they are southmost. All isotropic, slumbrous people are analyzed. Amalita is not proved.", "logic": "\nDiestrual(win)\nIsotropic(win)\nDiestrual(baily)\nCyclonal(baily)\nSouthmost(baily)\nIsotropic(sharia)\nSlumbrous(sharia)\nProved(sharia)\nSouthmost(amalita)\nAnalyzed(amalita)\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) -> Isotropic(x))\nSouthmost(amalita) -> Cyclonal(amalita)\nforall x (Diestrual(x) -> Cyclonal(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) -> Analyzed(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Proved(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Diestrual(x) and Cyclonal(x) -> Proved(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) and Analyzed(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Slumbrous(x) -> Analyzed(x))\n\nnot Proved(amalita)\n\nforall x (Diestrual(x) and Cyclonal(x) -> Proved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Georgia is penniless. Georgia is adoptive. Jessalyn is penniless. Jessalyn is paired. Jessalyn is gaudy. Blinny is adoptive. Blinny is slurred. Blinny is briton. Iggie is gaudy. Iggie is sinkable. Furry people are adoptive. If Iggie is gaudy then Iggie is paired. All penniless people are paired. Kind people are sinkable. If someone is adoptive and briton then they are gaudy. All penniless, paired people are briton. If someone is paired and sinkable then they are gaudy. All adoptive, slurred people are sinkable. Iggie is adoptive.", "logic": "\nPenniless(georgia)\nAdoptive(georgia)\nPenniless(jessalyn)\nPaired(jessalyn)\nGaudy(jessalyn)\nAdoptive(blinny)\nSlurred(blinny)\nBriton(blinny)\nGaudy(iggie)\nSinkable(iggie)\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Adoptive(x))\nGaudy(iggie) -> Paired(iggie)\nforall x (Penniless(x) -> Paired(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) and Briton(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Penniless(x) and Paired(x) -> Briton(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Sinkable(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) and Slurred(x) -> Sinkable(x))\n\nAdoptive(iggie)\n\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Adoptive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Bobbette is mimic. Bobbette is licentious. Emogene is mimic. Emogene is moronic. Emogene is quondam. Brock is licentious. Brock is britannic. Brock is timorous. Erminie is quondam. Erminie is earthlike. Furry people are licentious. If Erminie is quondam then Erminie is moronic. All mimic people are moronic. Kind people are earthlike. If someone is licentious and timorous then they are quondam. All mimic, moronic people are timorous. If someone is moronic and earthlike then they are quondam. All licentious, britannic people are earthlike. Erminie is not britannic.", "logic": "\nMimic(bobbette)\nLicentious(bobbette)\nMimic(emogene)\nMoronic(emogene)\nQuondam(emogene)\nLicentious(brock)\nBritannic(brock)\nTimorous(brock)\nQuondam(erminie)\nEarthlike(erminie)\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Licentious(x))\nQuondam(erminie) -> Moronic(erminie)\nforall x (Mimic(x) -> Moronic(x))\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Earthlike(x))\nforall x (Licentious(x) and Timorous(x) -> Quondam(x))\nforall x (Mimic(x) and Moronic(x) -> Timorous(x))\nforall x (Moronic(x) and Earthlike(x) -> Quondam(x))\nforall x (Licentious(x) and Britannic(x) -> Earthlike(x))\n\nnot Britannic(erminie)\n\nnot Britannic(erminie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Violette is rosaceous. Violette is trusted. Udale is rosaceous. Udale is innumerous. Udale is persuasive. Karry is trusted. Karry is calicular. Karry is gaunt. Verge is persuasive. Verge is trimmed. Furry people are trusted. If Verge is persuasive then Verge is innumerous. All rosaceous people are innumerous. Kind people are trimmed. If someone is trusted and gaunt then they are persuasive. All rosaceous, innumerous people are gaunt. If someone is innumerous and trimmed then they are persuasive. All trusted, calicular people are trimmed. Karry is rosaceous.", "logic": "\nRosaceous(violette)\nTrusted(violette)\nRosaceous(udale)\nInnumerous(udale)\nPersuasive(udale)\nTrusted(karry)\nCalicular(karry)\nGaunt(karry)\nPersuasive(verge)\nTrimmed(verge)\nforall x (Calicular(x) -> Trusted(x))\nPersuasive(verge) -> Innumerous(verge)\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) -> Innumerous(x))\nforall x (Innumerous(x) -> Trimmed(x))\nforall x (Trusted(x) and Gaunt(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) and Innumerous(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Innumerous(x) and Trimmed(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Trusted(x) and Calicular(x) -> Trimmed(x))\n\nRosaceous(karry)\n\nRosaceous(karry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Faith is apish. Faith is wakeful. Heda is apish. Heda is oleaginous. Heda is underfed. Garfield is wakeful. Garfield is variolar. Garfield is unaffixed. Rasia is underfed. Rasia is euphonic. Furry people are wakeful. If Rasia is underfed then Rasia is oleaginous. All apish people are oleaginous. Kind people are euphonic. If someone is wakeful and unaffixed then they are underfed. All apish, oleaginous people are unaffixed. If someone is oleaginous and euphonic then they are underfed. All wakeful, variolar people are euphonic. Rasia is not apish.", "logic": "\nApish(faith)\nWakeful(faith)\nApish(heda)\nOleaginous(heda)\nUnderfed(heda)\nWakeful(garfield)\nVariolar(garfield)\nUnaffixed(garfield)\nUnderfed(rasia)\nEuphonic(rasia)\nforall x (Variolar(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nUnderfed(rasia) -> Oleaginous(rasia)\nforall x (Apish(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Euphonic(x))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) and Unaffixed(x) -> Underfed(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) and Oleaginous(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and Euphonic(x) -> Underfed(x))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) and Variolar(x) -> Euphonic(x))\n\nnot Apish(rasia)\n\nnot Apish(rasia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Todd is successive. Todd is unflurried. Dennis is successive. Dennis is ritzy. Dennis is bidentate. Danella is unflurried. Danella is cacodylic. Danella is bare. Carola is bidentate. Carola is automated. Furry people are unflurried. If Carola is bidentate then Carola is ritzy. All successive people are ritzy. Kind people are automated. If someone is unflurried and bare then they are bidentate. All successive, ritzy people are bare. If someone is ritzy and automated then they are bidentate. All unflurried, cacodylic people are automated. Todd is cacodylic.", "logic": "\nSuccessive(todd)\nUnflurried(todd)\nSuccessive(dennis)\nRitzy(dennis)\nBidentate(dennis)\nUnflurried(danella)\nCacodylic(danella)\nBare(danella)\nBidentate(carola)\nAutomated(carola)\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) -> Unflurried(x))\nBidentate(carola) -> Ritzy(carola)\nforall x (Successive(x) -> Ritzy(x))\nforall x (Ritzy(x) -> Automated(x))\nforall x (Unflurried(x) and Bare(x) -> Bidentate(x))\nforall x (Successive(x) and Ritzy(x) -> Bare(x))\nforall x (Ritzy(x) and Automated(x) -> Bidentate(x))\nforall x (Unflurried(x) and Cacodylic(x) -> Automated(x))\n\nCacodylic(todd)\n\nCacodylic(todd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Carlyn is metallike. Carlyn is risen. Carlyn is slanted. Carlyn is weather. Carlyn is broody. Carlyn is missionary. Carlyn is venetian. Vicki is metallike. Vicki is risen. Vicki is weather. Vicki is venetian. Jerrine is risen. Jerrine is slanted. Jerrine is weather. Jerrine is missionary. If something is slanted then it is missionary. Young, missionary things are broody. Young things are slanted. Vicki is risen.", "logic": "\nMetallike(carlyn)\nRisen(carlyn)\nSlanted(carlyn)\nWeather(carlyn)\nBroody(carlyn)\nMissionary(carlyn)\nVenetian(carlyn)\nMetallike(vicki)\nRisen(vicki)\nWeather(vicki)\nVenetian(vicki)\nRisen(jerrine)\nSlanted(jerrine)\nWeather(jerrine)\nMissionary(jerrine)\nforall x (Slanted(x) -> Missionary(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) and Missionary(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) -> Slanted(x))\n\nRisen(vicki)\n\ntherefore Risen(vicki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Evie is designed. Evie is burdened. Evie is lyrate. Evie is scarlet. Evie is absolutist. Evie is demotic. Evie is matted. Darby is designed. Darby is burdened. Darby is scarlet. Darby is matted. Sibyl is burdened. Sibyl is lyrate. Sibyl is scarlet. Sibyl is demotic. If something is lyrate then it is demotic. Young, demotic things are absolutist. Young things are lyrate. Darby is not matted.", "logic": "\nDesigned(evie)\nBurdened(evie)\nLyrate(evie)\nScarlet(evie)\nAbsolutist(evie)\nDemotic(evie)\nMatted(evie)\nDesigned(darby)\nBurdened(darby)\nScarlet(darby)\nMatted(darby)\nBurdened(sibyl)\nLyrate(sibyl)\nScarlet(sibyl)\nDemotic(sibyl)\nforall x (Lyrate(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Matted(x) and Demotic(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Matted(x) -> Lyrate(x))\n\nnot Matted(darby)\n\ntherefore Matted(darby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Daniella is much. Daniella is befouled. Daniella is shipshape. Daniella is shallow. Daniella is cloisonne. Daniella is uncurbed. Daniella is cultivable. Helise is much. Helise is befouled. Helise is shallow. Helise is cultivable. Gallagher is befouled. Gallagher is shipshape. Gallagher is shallow. Gallagher is uncurbed. If something is shipshape then it is uncurbed. Young, uncurbed things are cloisonne. Young things are shipshape. Helise is shipshape.", "logic": "\nMuch(daniella)\nBefouled(daniella)\nShipshape(daniella)\nShallow(daniella)\nCloisonne(daniella)\nUncurbed(daniella)\nCultivable(daniella)\nMuch(helise)\nBefouled(helise)\nShallow(helise)\nCultivable(helise)\nBefouled(gallagher)\nShipshape(gallagher)\nShallow(gallagher)\nUncurbed(gallagher)\nforall x (Shipshape(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nforall x (Cultivable(x) and Uncurbed(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\nforall x (Cultivable(x) -> Shipshape(x))\n\nShipshape(helise)\n\nCultivable(helise) and forall x (Cultivable(x) -> Shipshape(x)) -> therefore Shipshape(helise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Ardine is estrogenic. Ardine is underbred. Ardine is verbatim. Ardine is honduran. Ardine is peppy. Ardine is mock. Ardine is idiomatic. Baird is estrogenic. Baird is underbred. Baird is honduran. Baird is idiomatic. Gladi is underbred. Gladi is verbatim. Gladi is honduran. Gladi is mock. If something is verbatim then it is mock. Young, mock things are peppy. Young things are verbatim. Baird is not verbatim.", "logic": "\nEstrogenic(ardine)\nUnderbred(ardine)\nVerbatim(ardine)\nHonduran(ardine)\nPeppy(ardine)\nMock(ardine)\nIdiomatic(ardine)\nEstrogenic(baird)\nUnderbred(baird)\nHonduran(baird)\nIdiomatic(baird)\nUnderbred(gladi)\nVerbatim(gladi)\nHonduran(gladi)\nMock(gladi)\nforall x (Verbatim(x) -> Mock(x))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) and Mock(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) -> Verbatim(x))\n\nnot Verbatim(baird)\n\nIdiomatic(baird) and forall x (Idiomatic(x) -> Verbatim(x)) -> therefore Verbatim(baird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Corine is newsy. Corine is gibelike. Corine is corsican. Corine is eightfold. Corine is unplanned. Corine is straying. Corine is affixial. Cinda is newsy. Cinda is gibelike. Cinda is eightfold. Cinda is affixial. Blanca is gibelike. Blanca is corsican. Blanca is eightfold. Blanca is straying. If something is corsican then it is straying. Young, straying things are unplanned. Young things are corsican. Cinda is straying.", "logic": "\nNewsy(corine)\nGibelike(corine)\nCorsican(corine)\nEightfold(corine)\nUnplanned(corine)\nStraying(corine)\nAffixial(corine)\nNewsy(cinda)\nGibelike(cinda)\nEightfold(cinda)\nAffixial(cinda)\nGibelike(blanca)\nCorsican(blanca)\nEightfold(blanca)\nStraying(blanca)\nforall x (Corsican(x) -> Straying(x))\nforall x (Affixial(x) and Straying(x) -> Unplanned(x))\nforall x (Affixial(x) -> Corsican(x))\n\nStraying(cinda)\n\nAffixial(cinda) and forall x (Affixial(x) -> Corsican(x)) -> therefore Corsican(cinda) Corsican(cinda) and forall x (Corsican(x) -> Straying(x)) -> therefore Straying(cinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Diena is pantropic. Diena is copular. Diena is chinked. Diena is affecting. Diena is tuneless. Diena is aecial. Diena is nipponese. Devonne is pantropic. Devonne is copular. Devonne is affecting. Devonne is nipponese. Marilyn is copular. Marilyn is chinked. Marilyn is affecting. Marilyn is aecial. If something is chinked then it is aecial. Young, aecial things are tuneless. Young things are chinked. Devonne is not aecial.", "logic": "\nPantropic(diena)\nCopular(diena)\nChinked(diena)\nAffecting(diena)\nTuneless(diena)\nAecial(diena)\nNipponese(diena)\nPantropic(devonne)\nCopular(devonne)\nAffecting(devonne)\nNipponese(devonne)\nCopular(marilyn)\nChinked(marilyn)\nAffecting(marilyn)\nAecial(marilyn)\nforall x (Chinked(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Nipponese(x) and Aecial(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nforall x (Nipponese(x) -> Chinked(x))\n\nnot Aecial(devonne)\n\nNipponese(devonne) and forall x (Nipponese(x) -> Chinked(x)) -> therefore Chinked(devonne) Chinked(devonne) and forall x (Chinked(x) -> Aecial(x)) -> therefore Aecial(devonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Eustacia is algal. Eustacia is broody. Eustacia is bedraggled. Eustacia is protean. Eustacia is shabby. Eustacia is unrealized. Eustacia is parallel. Rolph is algal. Rolph is broody. Rolph is protean. Rolph is parallel. Gwyneth is broody. Gwyneth is bedraggled. Gwyneth is protean. Gwyneth is unrealized. If something is bedraggled then it is unrealized. Young, unrealized things are shabby. Young things are bedraggled. Rolph is shabby.", "logic": "\nAlgal(eustacia)\nBroody(eustacia)\nBedraggled(eustacia)\nProtean(eustacia)\nShabby(eustacia)\nUnrealized(eustacia)\nParallel(eustacia)\nAlgal(rolph)\nBroody(rolph)\nProtean(rolph)\nParallel(rolph)\nBroody(gwyneth)\nBedraggled(gwyneth)\nProtean(gwyneth)\nUnrealized(gwyneth)\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) -> Unrealized(x))\nforall x (Parallel(x) and Unrealized(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Parallel(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\n\nShabby(rolph)\n\nParallel(rolph) and forall x (Parallel(x) -> Bedraggled(x)) -> therefore Bedraggled(rolph) Bedraggled(rolph) and forall x (Bedraggled(x) -> Unrealized(x)) -> therefore Unrealized(rolph) Parallel(rolph) and Unrealized(rolph) and forall x (Parallel(x) and Unrealized(x) -> Shabby(x)) -> therefore Shabby(rolph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Brooks is chartreuse. Brooks is irish. Brooks is aboriginal. Brooks is hulking. Brooks is circinate. Brooks is salvific. Brooks is allied. Lynette is chartreuse. Lynette is irish. Lynette is hulking. Lynette is allied. Dynah is irish. Dynah is aboriginal. Dynah is hulking. Dynah is salvific. If something is aboriginal then it is salvific. Young, salvific things are circinate. Young things are aboriginal. Lynette is not circinate.", "logic": "\nChartreuse(brooks)\nIrish(brooks)\nAboriginal(brooks)\nHulking(brooks)\nCircinate(brooks)\nSalvific(brooks)\nAllied(brooks)\nChartreuse(lynette)\nIrish(lynette)\nHulking(lynette)\nAllied(lynette)\nIrish(dynah)\nAboriginal(dynah)\nHulking(dynah)\nSalvific(dynah)\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) -> Salvific(x))\nforall x (Allied(x) and Salvific(x) -> Circinate(x))\nforall x (Allied(x) -> Aboriginal(x))\n\nnot Circinate(lynette)\n\nAllied(lynette) and forall x (Allied(x) -> Aboriginal(x)) -> therefore Aboriginal(lynette) Aboriginal(lynette) and forall x (Aboriginal(x) -> Salvific(x)) -> therefore Salvific(lynette) Allied(lynette) and Salvific(lynette) and forall x (Allied(x) and Salvific(x) -> Circinate(x)) -> therefore Circinate(lynette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Ajay is bimodal. Ajay is newsless. Ajay is adulterine. Ajay is acquainted. Ajay is sneaking. Ajay is bituminous. Ajay is superhuman. Casi is bimodal. Casi is newsless. Casi is acquainted. Casi is superhuman. Ellsworth is newsless. Ellsworth is adulterine. Ellsworth is acquainted. Ellsworth is bituminous. If something is adulterine then it is bituminous. Young, bituminous things are sneaking. Young things are adulterine. Ellsworth is not sneaking.", "logic": "\nBimodal(ajay)\nNewsless(ajay)\nAdulterine(ajay)\nAcquainted(ajay)\nSneaking(ajay)\nBituminous(ajay)\nSuperhuman(ajay)\nBimodal(casi)\nNewsless(casi)\nAcquainted(casi)\nSuperhuman(casi)\nNewsless(ellsworth)\nAdulterine(ellsworth)\nAcquainted(ellsworth)\nBituminous(ellsworth)\nforall x (Adulterine(x) -> Bituminous(x))\nforall x (Superhuman(x) and Bituminous(x) -> Sneaking(x))\nforall x (Superhuman(x) -> Adulterine(x))\n\nnot Sneaking(ellsworth)\n\nforall x (Superhuman(x) and Bituminous(x) -> Sneaking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Paulina is shady. Paulina is sunken. Paulina is umptieth. Paulina is downstairs. Paulina is anorectal. Paulina is prox. Paulina is impersonal. Roobbie is shady. Roobbie is sunken. Roobbie is downstairs. Roobbie is impersonal. Eden is sunken. Eden is umptieth. Eden is downstairs. Eden is prox. If something is umptieth then it is prox. Young, prox things are anorectal. Young things are umptieth. Eden is impersonal.", "logic": "\nShady(paulina)\nSunken(paulina)\nUmptieth(paulina)\nDownstairs(paulina)\nAnorectal(paulina)\nProx(paulina)\nImpersonal(paulina)\nShady(roobbie)\nSunken(roobbie)\nDownstairs(roobbie)\nImpersonal(roobbie)\nSunken(eden)\nUmptieth(eden)\nDownstairs(eden)\nProx(eden)\nforall x (Umptieth(x) -> Prox(x))\nforall x (Impersonal(x) and Prox(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Impersonal(x) -> Umptieth(x))\n\nImpersonal(eden)\n\nImpersonal(eden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "The cordelie espy the rogers. The britni espy the ardelia. The britni gluttonize the rogers. The ardelia is unbaffled. The ardelia is fictive. The ardelia espy the britni. The rogers espy the britni. If someone is improving and they need the rogers then they are muddied. If the britni espy the cordelie then the cordelie is paralytic. If someone espy the ardelia then they need the cordelie. Blue people are not fictive. If someone gluttonize the britni then they see the ardelia. If someone whish the cordelie then the cordelie does not need the rogers. If someone espy the rogers and they do not need the cordelie then the cordelie espy the britni. If someone espy the britni and they are not paralytic then they are unbaffled. The ardelia is fictive.", "logic": "\nEspy(cordelie, rogers)\nEspy(britni, ardelia)\nGluttonize(britni, rogers)\nUnbaffled(ardelia)\nFictive(ardelia)\nEspy(ardelia, britni)\nEspy(rogers, britni)\nforall x (Improving(x) and Espy(x, rogers) -> Muddied(x))\nEspy(britni, cordelie) -> Paralytic(cordelie)\nforall x (Espy(x, ardelia) -> Espy(x, cordelie))\nforall x (Paralytic(x) -> not Fictive(x))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, britni) -> Gluttonize(x, ardelia))\nforall x (Whish(x, cordelie) -> not Espy(cordelie, rogers))\nforall x (Espy(x, rogers) and not Espy(x, cordelie) -> Espy(cordelie, britni))\nforall x (Espy(x, britni) and not Paralytic(x) -> Unbaffled(x))\n\nFictive(ardelia)\n\ntherefore Fictive(ardelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The kalli extort the ninon. The benoite extort the shauna. The benoite subdue the ninon. The shauna is crinkled. The shauna is unabated. The shauna extort the benoite. The ninon extort the benoite. If someone is allowable and they need the ninon then they are oversexed. If the benoite extort the kalli then the kalli is lucifugal. If someone extort the shauna then they need the kalli. Blue people are not unabated. If someone subdue the benoite then they see the shauna. If someone wilt the kalli then the kalli does not need the ninon. If someone extort the ninon and they do not need the kalli then the kalli extort the benoite. If someone extort the benoite and they are not lucifugal then they are crinkled. The ninon does not need the benoite.", "logic": "\nExtort(kalli, ninon)\nExtort(benoite, shauna)\nSubdue(benoite, ninon)\nCrinkled(shauna)\nUnabated(shauna)\nExtort(shauna, benoite)\nExtort(ninon, benoite)\nforall x (Allowable(x) and Extort(x, ninon) -> Oversexed(x))\nExtort(benoite, kalli) -> Lucifugal(kalli)\nforall x (Extort(x, shauna) -> Extort(x, kalli))\nforall x (Lucifugal(x) -> not Unabated(x))\nforall x (Subdue(x, benoite) -> Subdue(x, shauna))\nforall x (Wilt(x, kalli) -> not Extort(kalli, ninon))\nforall x (Extort(x, ninon) and not Extort(x, kalli) -> Extort(kalli, benoite))\nforall x (Extort(x, benoite) and not Lucifugal(x) -> Crinkled(x))\n\nnot Extort(ninon, benoite)\n\ntherefore Extort(ninon, benoite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The evita peroxide the ashely. The malissia peroxide the andra. The malissia bull the ashely. The andra is remarkable. The andra is duteous. The andra peroxide the malissia. The ashely peroxide the malissia. If someone is base and they need the ashely then they are candent. If the malissia peroxide the evita then the evita is reflexive. If someone peroxide the andra then they need the evita. Blue people are not duteous. If someone bull the malissia then they see the andra. If someone plait the evita then the evita does not need the ashely. If someone peroxide the ashely and they do not need the evita then the evita peroxide the malissia. If someone peroxide the malissia and they are not reflexive then they are remarkable. The malissia peroxide the evita.", "logic": "\nPeroxide(evita, ashely)\nPeroxide(malissia, andra)\nBull(malissia, ashely)\nRemarkable(andra)\nDuteous(andra)\nPeroxide(andra, malissia)\nPeroxide(ashely, malissia)\nforall x (Base(x) and Peroxide(x, ashely) -> Candent(x))\nPeroxide(malissia, evita) -> Reflexive(evita)\nforall x (Peroxide(x, andra) -> Peroxide(x, evita))\nforall x (Reflexive(x) -> not Duteous(x))\nforall x (Bull(x, malissia) -> Bull(x, andra))\nforall x (Plait(x, evita) -> not Peroxide(evita, ashely))\nforall x (Peroxide(x, ashely) and not Peroxide(x, evita) -> Peroxide(evita, malissia))\nforall x (Peroxide(x, malissia) and not Reflexive(x) -> Remarkable(x))\n\nPeroxide(malissia, evita)\n\nPeroxide(malissia, andra) and forall x (Peroxide(x, andra) -> Peroxide(x, evita)) -> therefore Peroxide(malissia, evita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The fayette frequent the janella. The dunstan frequent the vania. The dunstan untie the janella. The vania is paniculate. The vania is unfeigned. The vania frequent the dunstan. The janella frequent the dunstan. If someone is cambial and they need the janella then they are soaring. If the dunstan frequent the fayette then the fayette is almighty. If someone frequent the vania then they need the fayette. Blue people are not unfeigned. If someone untie the dunstan then they see the vania. If someone devilize the fayette then the fayette does not need the janella. If someone frequent the janella and they do not need the fayette then the fayette frequent the dunstan. If someone frequent the dunstan and they are not almighty then they are paniculate. The dunstan does not need the fayette.", "logic": "\nFrequent(fayette, janella)\nFrequent(dunstan, vania)\nUntie(dunstan, janella)\nPaniculate(vania)\nUnfeigned(vania)\nFrequent(vania, dunstan)\nFrequent(janella, dunstan)\nforall x (Cambial(x) and Frequent(x, janella) -> Soaring(x))\nFrequent(dunstan, fayette) -> Almighty(fayette)\nforall x (Frequent(x, vania) -> Frequent(x, fayette))\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> not Unfeigned(x))\nforall x (Untie(x, dunstan) -> Untie(x, vania))\nforall x (Devilize(x, fayette) -> not Frequent(fayette, janella))\nforall x (Frequent(x, janella) and not Frequent(x, fayette) -> Frequent(fayette, dunstan))\nforall x (Frequent(x, dunstan) and not Almighty(x) -> Paniculate(x))\n\nnot Frequent(dunstan, fayette)\n\nFrequent(dunstan, vania) and forall x (Frequent(x, vania) -> Frequent(x, fayette)) -> therefore Frequent(dunstan, fayette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The giorgi parcel the karlyn. The heinrich parcel the roth. The heinrich embroider the karlyn. The roth is fruitful. The roth is permed. The roth parcel the heinrich. The karlyn parcel the heinrich. If someone is unbaptised and they need the karlyn then they are strangled. If the heinrich parcel the giorgi then the giorgi is secret. If someone parcel the roth then they need the giorgi. Blue people are not permed. If someone embroider the heinrich then they see the roth. If someone skipper the giorgi then the giorgi does not need the karlyn. If someone parcel the karlyn and they do not need the giorgi then the giorgi parcel the heinrich. If someone parcel the heinrich and they are not secret then they are fruitful. The giorgi is secret.", "logic": "\nParcel(giorgi, karlyn)\nParcel(heinrich, roth)\nEmbroider(heinrich, karlyn)\nFruitful(roth)\nPermed(roth)\nParcel(roth, heinrich)\nParcel(karlyn, heinrich)\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and Parcel(x, karlyn) -> Strangled(x))\nParcel(heinrich, giorgi) -> Secret(giorgi)\nforall x (Parcel(x, roth) -> Parcel(x, giorgi))\nforall x (Secret(x) -> not Permed(x))\nforall x (Embroider(x, heinrich) -> Embroider(x, roth))\nforall x (Skipper(x, giorgi) -> not Parcel(giorgi, karlyn))\nforall x (Parcel(x, karlyn) and not Parcel(x, giorgi) -> Parcel(giorgi, heinrich))\nforall x (Parcel(x, heinrich) and not Secret(x) -> Fruitful(x))\n\nSecret(giorgi)\n\nParcel(heinrich, roth) and forall x (Parcel(x, roth) -> Parcel(x, giorgi)) -> therefore Parcel(heinrich, giorgi) Parcel(heinrich, giorgi) and Parcel(heinrich, giorgi) -> Secret(giorgi) -> therefore Secret(giorgi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The ariel pole the regan. The sibley pole the sharon. The sibley stutter the regan. The sharon is uttermost. The sharon is effluent. The sharon pole the sibley. The regan pole the sibley. If someone is jaggy and they need the regan then they are lyrate. If the sibley pole the ariel then the ariel is pendant. If someone pole the sharon then they need the ariel. Blue people are not effluent. If someone stutter the sibley then they see the sharon. If someone strive the ariel then the ariel does not need the regan. If someone pole the regan and they do not need the ariel then the ariel pole the sibley. If someone pole the sibley and they are not pendant then they are uttermost. The ariel is not pendant.", "logic": "\nPole(ariel, regan)\nPole(sibley, sharon)\nStutter(sibley, regan)\nUttermost(sharon)\nEffluent(sharon)\nPole(sharon, sibley)\nPole(regan, sibley)\nforall x (Jaggy(x) and Pole(x, regan) -> Lyrate(x))\nPole(sibley, ariel) -> Pendant(ariel)\nforall x (Pole(x, sharon) -> Pole(x, ariel))\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> not Effluent(x))\nforall x (Stutter(x, sibley) -> Stutter(x, sharon))\nforall x (Strive(x, ariel) -> not Pole(ariel, regan))\nforall x (Pole(x, regan) and not Pole(x, ariel) -> Pole(ariel, sibley))\nforall x (Pole(x, sibley) and not Pendant(x) -> Uttermost(x))\n\nnot Pendant(ariel)\n\nPole(sibley, sharon) and forall x (Pole(x, sharon) -> Pole(x, ariel)) -> therefore Pole(sibley, ariel) Pole(sibley, ariel) and Pole(sibley, ariel) -> Pendant(ariel) -> therefore Pendant(ariel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The malanie comport the harman. The karleen comport the corenda. The karleen retrovert the harman. The corenda is northeast. The corenda is roughdried. The corenda comport the karleen. The harman comport the karleen. If someone is square and they need the harman then they are neutered. If the karleen comport the malanie then the malanie is bewildered. If someone comport the corenda then they need the malanie. Blue people are not roughdried. If someone retrovert the karleen then they see the corenda. If someone eternalise the malanie then the malanie does not need the harman. If someone comport the harman and they do not need the malanie then the malanie comport the karleen. If someone comport the karleen and they are not bewildered then they are northeast. The malanie is not roughdried.", "logic": "\nComport(malanie, harman)\nComport(karleen, corenda)\nRetrovert(karleen, harman)\nNortheast(corenda)\nRoughdried(corenda)\nComport(corenda, karleen)\nComport(harman, karleen)\nforall x (Square(x) and Comport(x, harman) -> Neutered(x))\nComport(karleen, malanie) -> Bewildered(malanie)\nforall x (Comport(x, corenda) -> Comport(x, malanie))\nforall x (Bewildered(x) -> not Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, karleen) -> Retrovert(x, corenda))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, malanie) -> not Comport(malanie, harman))\nforall x (Comport(x, harman) and not Comport(x, malanie) -> Comport(malanie, karleen))\nforall x (Comport(x, karleen) and not Bewildered(x) -> Northeast(x))\n\nnot Roughdried(malanie)\n\nComport(karleen, corenda) and forall x (Comport(x, corenda) -> Comport(x, malanie)) -> therefore Comport(karleen, malanie) Comport(karleen, malanie) and Comport(karleen, malanie) -> Bewildered(malanie) -> therefore Bewildered(malanie) Bewildered(malanie) and forall x (Bewildered(x) -> not Roughdried(x)) -> therefore not Roughdried(malanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The cloris injure the arabel. The ranique injure the jephthah. The ranique riposte the arabel. The jephthah is expandible. The jephthah is dastard. The jephthah injure the ranique. The arabel injure the ranique. If someone is eminent and they need the arabel then they are pulpy. If the ranique injure the cloris then the cloris is unoccupied. If someone injure the jephthah then they need the cloris. Blue people are not dastard. If someone riposte the ranique then they see the jephthah. If someone canalize the cloris then the cloris does not need the arabel. If someone injure the arabel and they do not need the cloris then the cloris injure the ranique. If someone injure the ranique and they are not unoccupied then they are expandible. The cloris is dastard.", "logic": "\nInjure(cloris, arabel)\nInjure(ranique, jephthah)\nRiposte(ranique, arabel)\nExpandible(jephthah)\nDastard(jephthah)\nInjure(jephthah, ranique)\nInjure(arabel, ranique)\nforall x (Eminent(x) and Injure(x, arabel) -> Pulpy(x))\nInjure(ranique, cloris) -> Unoccupied(cloris)\nforall x (Injure(x, jephthah) -> Injure(x, cloris))\nforall x (Unoccupied(x) -> not Dastard(x))\nforall x (Riposte(x, ranique) -> Riposte(x, jephthah))\nforall x (Canalize(x, cloris) -> not Injure(cloris, arabel))\nforall x (Injure(x, arabel) and not Injure(x, cloris) -> Injure(cloris, ranique))\nforall x (Injure(x, ranique) and not Unoccupied(x) -> Expandible(x))\n\nDastard(cloris)\n\nInjure(ranique, jephthah) and forall x (Injure(x, jephthah) -> Injure(x, cloris)) -> therefore Injure(ranique, cloris) Injure(ranique, cloris) and Injure(ranique, cloris) -> Unoccupied(cloris) -> therefore Unoccupied(cloris) Unoccupied(cloris) and forall x (Unoccupied(x) -> not Dastard(x)) -> therefore not Dastard(cloris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The frederich palsy the alia. The wallache palsy the dorris. The wallache back the alia. The dorris is shrunken. The dorris is brief. The dorris palsy the wallache. The alia palsy the wallache. If someone is tweedy and they need the alia then they are prostatic. If the wallache palsy the frederich then the frederich is inculpable. If someone palsy the dorris then they need the frederich. Blue people are not brief. If someone back the wallache then they see the dorris. If someone lysogenize the frederich then the frederich does not need the alia. If someone palsy the alia and they do not need the frederich then the frederich palsy the wallache. If someone palsy the wallache and they are not inculpable then they are shrunken. The wallache is not shrunken.", "logic": "\nPalsy(frederich, alia)\nPalsy(wallache, dorris)\nBack(wallache, alia)\nShrunken(dorris)\nBrief(dorris)\nPalsy(dorris, wallache)\nPalsy(alia, wallache)\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Palsy(x, alia) -> Prostatic(x))\nPalsy(wallache, frederich) -> Inculpable(frederich)\nforall x (Palsy(x, dorris) -> Palsy(x, frederich))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> not Brief(x))\nforall x (Back(x, wallache) -> Back(x, dorris))\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, frederich) -> not Palsy(frederich, alia))\nforall x (Palsy(x, alia) and not Palsy(x, frederich) -> Palsy(frederich, wallache))\nforall x (Palsy(x, wallache) and not Inculpable(x) -> Shrunken(x))\n\nnot Shrunken(wallache)\n\nforall x (Palsy(x, wallache) and not Inculpable(x) -> Shrunken(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The sibilla mussitate the conchita. The cassy mussitate the fleur. The cassy spit the conchita. The fleur is feminine. The fleur is sunset. The fleur mussitate the cassy. The conchita mussitate the cassy. If someone is subhuman and they need the conchita then they are drastic. If the cassy mussitate the sibilla then the sibilla is biennial. If someone mussitate the fleur then they need the sibilla. Blue people are not sunset. If someone spit the cassy then they see the fleur. If someone readmit the sibilla then the sibilla does not need the conchita. If someone mussitate the conchita and they do not need the sibilla then the sibilla mussitate the cassy. If someone mussitate the cassy and they are not biennial then they are feminine. The fleur is drastic.", "logic": "\nMussitate(sibilla, conchita)\nMussitate(cassy, fleur)\nSpit(cassy, conchita)\nFeminine(fleur)\nSunset(fleur)\nMussitate(fleur, cassy)\nMussitate(conchita, cassy)\nforall x (Subhuman(x) and Mussitate(x, conchita) -> Drastic(x))\nMussitate(cassy, sibilla) -> Biennial(sibilla)\nforall x (Mussitate(x, fleur) -> Mussitate(x, sibilla))\nforall x (Biennial(x) -> not Sunset(x))\nforall x (Spit(x, cassy) -> Spit(x, fleur))\nforall x (Readmit(x, sibilla) -> not Mussitate(sibilla, conchita))\nforall x (Mussitate(x, conchita) and not Mussitate(x, sibilla) -> Mussitate(sibilla, cassy))\nforall x (Mussitate(x, cassy) and not Biennial(x) -> Feminine(x))\n\nDrastic(fleur)\n\nforall x (Subhuman(x) and Mussitate(x, conchita) -> Drastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The perry outmarch the mariel. The mariana outmarch the grove. The mariana dimple the mariel. The grove is agnostical. The grove is womanlike. The grove outmarch the mariana. The mariel outmarch the mariana. If someone is stitched and they need the mariel then they are suave. If the mariana outmarch the perry then the perry is wolflike. If someone outmarch the grove then they need the perry. Blue people are not womanlike. If someone dimple the mariana then they see the grove. If someone glug the perry then the perry does not need the mariel. If someone outmarch the mariel and they do not need the perry then the perry outmarch the mariana. If someone outmarch the mariana and they are not wolflike then they are agnostical. The perry is not agnostical.", "logic": "\nOutmarch(perry, mariel)\nOutmarch(mariana, grove)\nDimple(mariana, mariel)\nAgnostical(grove)\nWomanlike(grove)\nOutmarch(grove, mariana)\nOutmarch(mariel, mariana)\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Outmarch(x, mariel) -> Suave(x))\nOutmarch(mariana, perry) -> Wolflike(perry)\nforall x (Outmarch(x, grove) -> Outmarch(x, perry))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) -> not Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Dimple(x, mariana) -> Dimple(x, grove))\nforall x (Glug(x, perry) -> not Outmarch(perry, mariel))\nforall x (Outmarch(x, mariel) and not Outmarch(x, perry) -> Outmarch(perry, mariana))\nforall x (Outmarch(x, mariana) and not Wolflike(x) -> Agnostical(x))\n\nnot Agnostical(perry)\n\nforall x (Outmarch(x, mariana) and not Wolflike(x) -> Agnostical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The reggie moor the alan. The husein moor the penn. The husein mother the alan. The penn is lifeless. The penn is wounded. The penn moor the husein. The alan moor the husein. If someone is cambodian and they need the alan then they are reverent. If the husein moor the reggie then the reggie is allargando. If someone moor the penn then they need the reggie. Blue people are not wounded. If someone mother the husein then they see the penn. If someone determine the reggie then the reggie does not need the alan. If someone moor the alan and they do not need the reggie then the reggie moor the husein. If someone moor the husein and they are not allargando then they are lifeless. The reggie moor the reggie.", "logic": "\nMoor(reggie, alan)\nMoor(husein, penn)\nMother(husein, alan)\nLifeless(penn)\nWounded(penn)\nMoor(penn, husein)\nMoor(alan, husein)\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and Moor(x, alan) -> Reverent(x))\nMoor(husein, reggie) -> Allargando(reggie)\nforall x (Moor(x, penn) -> Moor(x, reggie))\nforall x (Allargando(x) -> not Wounded(x))\nforall x (Mother(x, husein) -> Mother(x, penn))\nforall x (Determine(x, reggie) -> not Moor(reggie, alan))\nforall x (Moor(x, alan) and not Moor(x, reggie) -> Moor(reggie, husein))\nforall x (Moor(x, husein) and not Allargando(x) -> Lifeless(x))\n\nMoor(reggie, reggie)\n\nforall x (Moor(x, penn) -> Moor(x, reggie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The cissy conclude the stavros. The gilbert conclude the kurtis. The gilbert flaunt the stavros. The kurtis is croaky. The kurtis is healthy. The kurtis conclude the gilbert. The stavros conclude the gilbert. If someone is timeworn and they need the stavros then they are xxxv. If the gilbert conclude the cissy then the cissy is jeweled. If someone conclude the kurtis then they need the cissy. Blue people are not healthy. If someone flaunt the gilbert then they see the kurtis. If someone roost the cissy then the cissy does not need the stavros. If someone conclude the stavros and they do not need the cissy then the cissy conclude the gilbert. If someone conclude the gilbert and they are not jeweled then they are croaky. The kurtis does not need the kurtis.", "logic": "\nConclude(cissy, stavros)\nConclude(gilbert, kurtis)\nFlaunt(gilbert, stavros)\nCroaky(kurtis)\nHealthy(kurtis)\nConclude(kurtis, gilbert)\nConclude(stavros, gilbert)\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and Conclude(x, stavros) -> Xxxv(x))\nConclude(gilbert, cissy) -> Jeweled(cissy)\nforall x (Conclude(x, kurtis) -> Conclude(x, cissy))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) -> not Healthy(x))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, gilbert) -> Flaunt(x, kurtis))\nforall x (Roost(x, cissy) -> not Conclude(cissy, stavros))\nforall x (Conclude(x, stavros) and not Conclude(x, cissy) -> Conclude(cissy, gilbert))\nforall x (Conclude(x, gilbert) and not Jeweled(x) -> Croaky(x))\n\nnot Conclude(kurtis, kurtis)\n\nnot Conclude(kurtis, kurtis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The veronique bereave the lettie. The johannes bereave the esma. The johannes proffer the lettie. The esma is antonymous. The esma is breasted. The esma bereave the johannes. The lettie bereave the johannes. If someone is unbeholden and they need the lettie then they are vicinal. If the johannes bereave the veronique then the veronique is unsalable. If someone bereave the esma then they need the veronique. Blue people are not breasted. If someone proffer the johannes then they see the esma. If someone flummox the veronique then the veronique does not need the lettie. If someone bereave the lettie and they do not need the veronique then the veronique bereave the johannes. If someone bereave the johannes and they are not unsalable then they are antonymous. The esma flummox the lettie.", "logic": "\nBereave(veronique, lettie)\nBereave(johannes, esma)\nProffer(johannes, lettie)\nAntonymous(esma)\nBreasted(esma)\nBereave(esma, johannes)\nBereave(lettie, johannes)\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) and Bereave(x, lettie) -> Vicinal(x))\nBereave(johannes, veronique) -> Unsalable(veronique)\nforall x (Bereave(x, esma) -> Bereave(x, veronique))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> not Breasted(x))\nforall x (Proffer(x, johannes) -> Proffer(x, esma))\nforall x (Flummox(x, veronique) -> not Bereave(veronique, lettie))\nforall x (Bereave(x, lettie) and not Bereave(x, veronique) -> Bereave(veronique, johannes))\nforall x (Bereave(x, johannes) and not Unsalable(x) -> Antonymous(x))\n\nFlummox(esma, lettie)\n\nFlummox(esma, lettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The pedro badmouth the winthrop. The susana badmouth the helsa. The susana bream the winthrop. The helsa is foodless. The helsa is legitimate. The helsa badmouth the susana. The winthrop badmouth the susana. If someone is brazen and they need the winthrop then they are biliary. If the susana badmouth the pedro then the pedro is alienable. If someone badmouth the helsa then they need the pedro. Blue people are not legitimate. If someone bream the susana then they see the helsa. If someone shamble the pedro then the pedro does not need the winthrop. If someone badmouth the winthrop and they do not need the pedro then the pedro badmouth the susana. If someone badmouth the susana and they are not alienable then they are foodless. The helsa does not eat the susana.", "logic": "\nBadmouth(pedro, winthrop)\nBadmouth(susana, helsa)\nBream(susana, winthrop)\nFoodless(helsa)\nLegitimate(helsa)\nBadmouth(helsa, susana)\nBadmouth(winthrop, susana)\nforall x (Brazen(x) and Badmouth(x, winthrop) -> Biliary(x))\nBadmouth(susana, pedro) -> Alienable(pedro)\nforall x (Badmouth(x, helsa) -> Badmouth(x, pedro))\nforall x (Alienable(x) -> not Legitimate(x))\nforall x (Bream(x, susana) -> Bream(x, helsa))\nforall x (Shamble(x, pedro) -> not Badmouth(pedro, winthrop))\nforall x (Badmouth(x, winthrop) and not Badmouth(x, pedro) -> Badmouth(pedro, susana))\nforall x (Badmouth(x, susana) and not Alienable(x) -> Foodless(x))\n\nnot Shamble(helsa, susana)\n\nnot Shamble(helsa, susana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The lucia rock the rhea. The teodora rock the sosanna. The teodora refreshen the rhea. The sosanna is rejected. The sosanna is cognate. The sosanna rock the teodora. The rhea rock the teodora. If someone is saute and they need the rhea then they are noticeable. If the teodora rock the lucia then the lucia is doomed. If someone rock the sosanna then they need the lucia. Blue people are not cognate. If someone refreshen the teodora then they see the sosanna. If someone reawaken the lucia then the lucia does not need the rhea. If someone rock the rhea and they do not need the lucia then the lucia rock the teodora. If someone rock the teodora and they are not doomed then they are rejected. The sosanna refreshen the rhea.", "logic": "\nRock(lucia, rhea)\nRock(teodora, sosanna)\nRefreshen(teodora, rhea)\nRejected(sosanna)\nCognate(sosanna)\nRock(sosanna, teodora)\nRock(rhea, teodora)\nforall x (Saute(x) and Rock(x, rhea) -> Noticeable(x))\nRock(teodora, lucia) -> Doomed(lucia)\nforall x (Rock(x, sosanna) -> Rock(x, lucia))\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> not Cognate(x))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, teodora) -> Refreshen(x, sosanna))\nforall x (Reawaken(x, lucia) -> not Rock(lucia, rhea))\nforall x (Rock(x, rhea) and not Rock(x, lucia) -> Rock(lucia, teodora))\nforall x (Rock(x, teodora) and not Doomed(x) -> Rejected(x))\n\nRefreshen(sosanna, rhea)\n\nRefreshen(sosanna, rhea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The catlee exempt the veda. The catlee sleigh the veda. The catlee is viceregal. The catlee flounder the veda. The veda is cubelike. The veda is eroded. The veda flounder the catlee. If something is chambered then it flounder the veda. If something exempt the catlee then the catlee is cubelike. If something is chambered and it sleigh the catlee then it is eroded. If something is eroded then it sleigh the catlee. If something exempt the veda and it is cubelike then it sleigh the catlee. If something flounder the veda and it is viceregal then the veda exempt the catlee. If something exempt the veda and the veda is eroded then the veda is viceregal. If something flounder the catlee and the catlee flounder the veda then it is viceregal. The veda is cubelike.", "logic": "\nExempt(catlee, veda)\nSleigh(catlee, veda)\nViceregal(catlee)\nFlounder(catlee, veda)\nCubelike(veda)\nEroded(veda)\nFlounder(veda, catlee)\nforall x (Chambered(x) -> Flounder(x, veda))\nforall x (Exempt(x, catlee) -> Cubelike(catlee))\nforall x (Chambered(x) and Sleigh(x, catlee) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Eroded(x) -> Sleigh(x, catlee))\nforall x (Exempt(x, veda) and Cubelike(x) -> Sleigh(x, catlee))\nforall x (Flounder(x, veda) and Viceregal(x) -> Exempt(veda, catlee))\nforall x (Exempt(x, veda) and Eroded(veda) -> Viceregal(veda))\nforall x (Flounder(x, catlee) and Flounder(catlee, veda) -> Viceregal(x))\n\nCubelike(veda)\n\ntherefore Cubelike(veda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The elna razz the griffin. The elna insure the griffin. The elna is latish. The elna account the griffin. The griffin is bushed. The griffin is fattened. The griffin account the elna. If something is licit then it account the griffin. If something razz the elna then the elna is bushed. If something is licit and it insure the elna then it is fattened. If something is fattened then it insure the elna. If something razz the griffin and it is bushed then it insure the elna. If something account the griffin and it is latish then the griffin razz the elna. If something razz the griffin and the griffin is fattened then the griffin is latish. If something account the elna and the elna account the griffin then it is latish. The elna does not chase the griffin.", "logic": "\nRazz(elna, griffin)\nInsure(elna, griffin)\nLatish(elna)\nAccount(elna, griffin)\nBushed(griffin)\nFattened(griffin)\nAccount(griffin, elna)\nforall x (Licit(x) -> Account(x, griffin))\nforall x (Razz(x, elna) -> Bushed(elna))\nforall x (Licit(x) and Insure(x, elna) -> Fattened(x))\nforall x (Fattened(x) -> Insure(x, elna))\nforall x (Razz(x, griffin) and Bushed(x) -> Insure(x, elna))\nforall x (Account(x, griffin) and Latish(x) -> Razz(griffin, elna))\nforall x (Razz(x, griffin) and Fattened(griffin) -> Latish(griffin))\nforall x (Account(x, elna) and Account(elna, griffin) -> Latish(x))\n\nnot Razz(elna, griffin)\n\ntherefore Razz(elna, griffin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The kathryn uncompress the mercy. The kathryn intermarry the mercy. The kathryn is exogamous. The kathryn proffer the mercy. The mercy is false. The mercy is tyrolese. The mercy proffer the kathryn. If something is pectineal then it proffer the mercy. If something uncompress the kathryn then the kathryn is false. If something is pectineal and it intermarry the kathryn then it is tyrolese. If something is tyrolese then it intermarry the kathryn. If something uncompress the mercy and it is false then it intermarry the kathryn. If something proffer the mercy and it is exogamous then the mercy uncompress the kathryn. If something uncompress the mercy and the mercy is tyrolese then the mercy is exogamous. If something proffer the kathryn and the kathryn proffer the mercy then it is exogamous. The mercy uncompress the kathryn.", "logic": "\nUncompress(kathryn, mercy)\nIntermarry(kathryn, mercy)\nExogamous(kathryn)\nProffer(kathryn, mercy)\nFalse(mercy)\nTyrolese(mercy)\nProffer(mercy, kathryn)\nforall x (Pectineal(x) -> Proffer(x, mercy))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, kathryn) -> False(kathryn))\nforall x (Pectineal(x) and Intermarry(x, kathryn) -> Tyrolese(x))\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Intermarry(x, kathryn))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, mercy) and False(x) -> Intermarry(x, kathryn))\nforall x (Proffer(x, mercy) and Exogamous(x) -> Uncompress(mercy, kathryn))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, mercy) and Tyrolese(mercy) -> Exogamous(mercy))\nforall x (Proffer(x, kathryn) and Proffer(kathryn, mercy) -> Exogamous(x))\n\nUncompress(mercy, kathryn)\n\nProffer(kathryn, mercy) and Exogamous(kathryn) and forall x (Proffer(x, mercy) and Exogamous(x) -> Uncompress(mercy, kathryn)) -> therefore Uncompress(mercy, kathryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The editha frustrate the flora. The editha radiate the flora. The editha is leibnizian. The editha deaden the flora. The flora is inclement. The flora is benumbed. The flora deaden the editha. If something is bandy then it deaden the flora. If something frustrate the editha then the editha is inclement. If something is bandy and it radiate the editha then it is benumbed. If something is benumbed then it radiate the editha. If something frustrate the flora and it is inclement then it radiate the editha. If something deaden the flora and it is leibnizian then the flora frustrate the editha. If something frustrate the flora and the flora is benumbed then the flora is leibnizian. If something deaden the editha and the editha deaden the flora then it is leibnizian. The flora does not chase the editha.", "logic": "\nFrustrate(editha, flora)\nRadiate(editha, flora)\nLeibnizian(editha)\nDeaden(editha, flora)\nInclement(flora)\nBenumbed(flora)\nDeaden(flora, editha)\nforall x (Bandy(x) -> Deaden(x, flora))\nforall x (Frustrate(x, editha) -> Inclement(editha))\nforall x (Bandy(x) and Radiate(x, editha) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Benumbed(x) -> Radiate(x, editha))\nforall x (Frustrate(x, flora) and Inclement(x) -> Radiate(x, editha))\nforall x (Deaden(x, flora) and Leibnizian(x) -> Frustrate(flora, editha))\nforall x (Frustrate(x, flora) and Benumbed(flora) -> Leibnizian(flora))\nforall x (Deaden(x, editha) and Deaden(editha, flora) -> Leibnizian(x))\n\nnot Frustrate(flora, editha)\n\nDeaden(editha, flora) and Leibnizian(editha) and forall x (Deaden(x, flora) and Leibnizian(x) -> Frustrate(flora, editha)) -> therefore Frustrate(flora, editha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The leif outperform the penrod. The leif airbrush the penrod. The leif is rusted. The leif modernize the penrod. The penrod is delusory. The penrod is cardiac. The penrod modernize the leif. If something is befogged then it modernize the penrod. If something outperform the leif then the leif is delusory. If something is befogged and it airbrush the leif then it is cardiac. If something is cardiac then it airbrush the leif. If something outperform the penrod and it is delusory then it airbrush the leif. If something modernize the penrod and it is rusted then the penrod outperform the leif. If something outperform the penrod and the penrod is cardiac then the penrod is rusted. If something modernize the leif and the leif modernize the penrod then it is rusted. The leif is delusory.", "logic": "\nOutperform(leif, penrod)\nAirbrush(leif, penrod)\nRusted(leif)\nModernize(leif, penrod)\nDelusory(penrod)\nCardiac(penrod)\nModernize(penrod, leif)\nforall x (Befogged(x) -> Modernize(x, penrod))\nforall x (Outperform(x, leif) -> Delusory(leif))\nforall x (Befogged(x) and Airbrush(x, leif) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Airbrush(x, leif))\nforall x (Outperform(x, penrod) and Delusory(x) -> Airbrush(x, leif))\nforall x (Modernize(x, penrod) and Rusted(x) -> Outperform(penrod, leif))\nforall x (Outperform(x, penrod) and Cardiac(penrod) -> Rusted(penrod))\nforall x (Modernize(x, leif) and Modernize(leif, penrod) -> Rusted(x))\n\nDelusory(leif)\n\nModernize(leif, penrod) and Rusted(leif) and forall x (Modernize(x, penrod) and Rusted(x) -> Outperform(penrod, leif)) -> therefore Outperform(penrod, leif) Outperform(penrod, leif) and forall x (Outperform(x, leif) -> Delusory(leif)) -> therefore Delusory(leif)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The rozanne barde the josy. The rozanne explain the josy. The rozanne is reniform. The rozanne keratinize the josy. The josy is verrucose. The josy is void. The josy keratinize the rozanne. If something is passive then it keratinize the josy. If something barde the rozanne then the rozanne is verrucose. If something is passive and it explain the rozanne then it is void. If something is void then it explain the rozanne. If something barde the josy and it is verrucose then it explain the rozanne. If something keratinize the josy and it is reniform then the josy barde the rozanne. If something barde the josy and the josy is void then the josy is reniform. If something keratinize the rozanne and the rozanne keratinize the josy then it is reniform. The rozanne is not verrucose.", "logic": "\nBarde(rozanne, josy)\nExplain(rozanne, josy)\nReniform(rozanne)\nKeratinize(rozanne, josy)\nVerrucose(josy)\nVoid(josy)\nKeratinize(josy, rozanne)\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Keratinize(x, josy))\nforall x (Barde(x, rozanne) -> Verrucose(rozanne))\nforall x (Passive(x) and Explain(x, rozanne) -> Void(x))\nforall x (Void(x) -> Explain(x, rozanne))\nforall x (Barde(x, josy) and Verrucose(x) -> Explain(x, rozanne))\nforall x (Keratinize(x, josy) and Reniform(x) -> Barde(josy, rozanne))\nforall x (Barde(x, josy) and Void(josy) -> Reniform(josy))\nforall x (Keratinize(x, rozanne) and Keratinize(rozanne, josy) -> Reniform(x))\n\nnot Verrucose(rozanne)\n\nKeratinize(rozanne, josy) and Reniform(rozanne) and forall x (Keratinize(x, josy) and Reniform(x) -> Barde(josy, rozanne)) -> therefore Barde(josy, rozanne) Barde(josy, rozanne) and forall x (Barde(x, rozanne) -> Verrucose(rozanne)) -> therefore Verrucose(rozanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The steve recycle the cristen. The steve antagonise the cristen. The steve is neotenous. The steve ionate the cristen. The cristen is trophic. The cristen is monastic. The cristen ionate the steve. If something is wifely then it ionate the cristen. If something recycle the steve then the steve is trophic. If something is wifely and it antagonise the steve then it is monastic. If something is monastic then it antagonise the steve. If something recycle the cristen and it is trophic then it antagonise the steve. If something ionate the cristen and it is neotenous then the cristen recycle the steve. If something recycle the cristen and the cristen is monastic then the cristen is neotenous. If something ionate the steve and the steve ionate the cristen then it is neotenous. The steve antagonise the steve.", "logic": "\nRecycle(steve, cristen)\nAntagonise(steve, cristen)\nNeotenous(steve)\nIonate(steve, cristen)\nTrophic(cristen)\nMonastic(cristen)\nIonate(cristen, steve)\nforall x (Wifely(x) -> Ionate(x, cristen))\nforall x (Recycle(x, steve) -> Trophic(steve))\nforall x (Wifely(x) and Antagonise(x, steve) -> Monastic(x))\nforall x (Monastic(x) -> Antagonise(x, steve))\nforall x (Recycle(x, cristen) and Trophic(x) -> Antagonise(x, steve))\nforall x (Ionate(x, cristen) and Neotenous(x) -> Recycle(cristen, steve))\nforall x (Recycle(x, cristen) and Monastic(cristen) -> Neotenous(cristen))\nforall x (Ionate(x, steve) and Ionate(steve, cristen) -> Neotenous(x))\n\nAntagonise(steve, steve)\n\nIonate(steve, cristen) and Neotenous(steve) and forall x (Ionate(x, cristen) and Neotenous(x) -> Recycle(cristen, steve)) -> therefore Recycle(cristen, steve) Recycle(cristen, steve) and forall x (Recycle(x, steve) -> Trophic(steve)) -> therefore Trophic(steve) Recycle(steve, cristen) and Trophic(steve) and forall x (Recycle(x, cristen) and Trophic(x) -> Antagonise(x, steve)) -> therefore Antagonise(steve, steve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The nelli kibbitz the lenard. The nelli ascribe the lenard. The nelli is affixial. The nelli incur the lenard. The lenard is unhygienic. The lenard is ferial. The lenard incur the nelli. If something is tyrannous then it incur the lenard. If something kibbitz the nelli then the nelli is unhygienic. If something is tyrannous and it ascribe the nelli then it is ferial. If something is ferial then it ascribe the nelli. If something kibbitz the lenard and it is unhygienic then it ascribe the nelli. If something incur the lenard and it is affixial then the lenard kibbitz the nelli. If something kibbitz the lenard and the lenard is ferial then the lenard is affixial. If something incur the nelli and the nelli incur the lenard then it is affixial. The nelli does not eat the nelli.", "logic": "\nKibbitz(nelli, lenard)\nAscribe(nelli, lenard)\nAffixial(nelli)\nIncur(nelli, lenard)\nUnhygienic(lenard)\nFerial(lenard)\nIncur(lenard, nelli)\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Incur(x, lenard))\nforall x (Kibbitz(x, nelli) -> Unhygienic(nelli))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) and Ascribe(x, nelli) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Ferial(x) -> Ascribe(x, nelli))\nforall x (Kibbitz(x, lenard) and Unhygienic(x) -> Ascribe(x, nelli))\nforall x (Incur(x, lenard) and Affixial(x) -> Kibbitz(lenard, nelli))\nforall x (Kibbitz(x, lenard) and Ferial(lenard) -> Affixial(lenard))\nforall x (Incur(x, nelli) and Incur(nelli, lenard) -> Affixial(x))\n\nnot Ascribe(nelli, nelli)\n\nIncur(nelli, lenard) and Affixial(nelli) and forall x (Incur(x, lenard) and Affixial(x) -> Kibbitz(lenard, nelli)) -> therefore Kibbitz(lenard, nelli) Kibbitz(lenard, nelli) and forall x (Kibbitz(x, nelli) -> Unhygienic(nelli)) -> therefore Unhygienic(nelli) Kibbitz(nelli, lenard) and Unhygienic(nelli) and forall x (Kibbitz(x, lenard) and Unhygienic(x) -> Ascribe(x, nelli)) -> therefore Ascribe(nelli, nelli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The mauritz whoosh the erda. The mauritz environ the erda. The mauritz is educative. The mauritz ligate the erda. The erda is energizing. The erda is manifest. The erda ligate the mauritz. If something is farseeing then it ligate the erda. If something whoosh the mauritz then the mauritz is energizing. If something is farseeing and it environ the mauritz then it is manifest. If something is manifest then it environ the mauritz. If something whoosh the erda and it is energizing then it environ the mauritz. If something ligate the erda and it is educative then the erda whoosh the mauritz. If something whoosh the erda and the erda is manifest then the erda is educative. If something ligate the mauritz and the mauritz ligate the erda then it is educative. The erda does not need the erda.", "logic": "\nWhoosh(mauritz, erda)\nEnviron(mauritz, erda)\nEducative(mauritz)\nLigate(mauritz, erda)\nEnergizing(erda)\nManifest(erda)\nLigate(erda, mauritz)\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Ligate(x, erda))\nforall x (Whoosh(x, mauritz) -> Energizing(mauritz))\nforall x (Farseeing(x) and Environ(x, mauritz) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Environ(x, mauritz))\nforall x (Whoosh(x, erda) and Energizing(x) -> Environ(x, mauritz))\nforall x (Ligate(x, erda) and Educative(x) -> Whoosh(erda, mauritz))\nforall x (Whoosh(x, erda) and Manifest(erda) -> Educative(erda))\nforall x (Ligate(x, mauritz) and Ligate(mauritz, erda) -> Educative(x))\n\nnot Ligate(erda, erda)\n\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Ligate(x, erda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The camala yarn the lilyan. The camala dislike the lilyan. The camala is motiveless. The camala resort the lilyan. The lilyan is yogic. The lilyan is feeble. The lilyan resort the camala. If something is pessimal then it resort the lilyan. If something yarn the camala then the camala is yogic. If something is pessimal and it dislike the camala then it is feeble. If something is feeble then it dislike the camala. If something yarn the lilyan and it is yogic then it dislike the camala. If something resort the lilyan and it is motiveless then the lilyan yarn the camala. If something yarn the lilyan and the lilyan is feeble then the lilyan is motiveless. If something resort the camala and the camala resort the lilyan then it is motiveless. The camala is feeble.", "logic": "\nYarn(camala, lilyan)\nDislike(camala, lilyan)\nMotiveless(camala)\nResort(camala, lilyan)\nYogic(lilyan)\nFeeble(lilyan)\nResort(lilyan, camala)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> Resort(x, lilyan))\nforall x (Yarn(x, camala) -> Yogic(camala))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Dislike(x, camala) -> Feeble(x))\nforall x (Feeble(x) -> Dislike(x, camala))\nforall x (Yarn(x, lilyan) and Yogic(x) -> Dislike(x, camala))\nforall x (Resort(x, lilyan) and Motiveless(x) -> Yarn(lilyan, camala))\nforall x (Yarn(x, lilyan) and Feeble(lilyan) -> Motiveless(lilyan))\nforall x (Resort(x, camala) and Resort(camala, lilyan) -> Motiveless(x))\n\nFeeble(camala)\n\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Dislike(x, camala) -> Feeble(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The phip buck the hermia. The phip begild the hermia. The phip is benzylic. The phip degrade the hermia. The hermia is sage. The hermia is teeming. The hermia degrade the phip. If something is passerine then it degrade the hermia. If something buck the phip then the phip is sage. If something is passerine and it begild the phip then it is teeming. If something is teeming then it begild the phip. If something buck the hermia and it is sage then it begild the phip. If something degrade the hermia and it is benzylic then the hermia buck the phip. If something buck the hermia and the hermia is teeming then the hermia is benzylic. If something degrade the phip and the phip degrade the hermia then it is benzylic. The hermia does not chase the hermia.", "logic": "\nBuck(phip, hermia)\nBegild(phip, hermia)\nBenzylic(phip)\nDegrade(phip, hermia)\nSage(hermia)\nTeeming(hermia)\nDegrade(hermia, phip)\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Degrade(x, hermia))\nforall x (Buck(x, phip) -> Sage(phip))\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Begild(x, phip) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Teeming(x) -> Begild(x, phip))\nforall x (Buck(x, hermia) and Sage(x) -> Begild(x, phip))\nforall x (Degrade(x, hermia) and Benzylic(x) -> Buck(hermia, phip))\nforall x (Buck(x, hermia) and Teeming(hermia) -> Benzylic(hermia))\nforall x (Degrade(x, phip) and Degrade(phip, hermia) -> Benzylic(x))\n\nnot Buck(hermia, hermia)\n\nnot Buck(hermia, hermia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The jon screak the selestina. The jon reef the selestina. The jon is moraceous. The jon detest the selestina. The selestina is verified. The selestina is bracing. The selestina detest the jon. If something is obligate then it detest the selestina. If something screak the jon then the jon is verified. If something is obligate and it reef the jon then it is bracing. If something is bracing then it reef the jon. If something screak the selestina and it is verified then it reef the jon. If something detest the selestina and it is moraceous then the selestina screak the jon. If something screak the selestina and the selestina is bracing then the selestina is moraceous. If something detest the jon and the jon detest the selestina then it is moraceous. The jon detest the jon.", "logic": "\nScreak(jon, selestina)\nReef(jon, selestina)\nMoraceous(jon)\nDetest(jon, selestina)\nVerified(selestina)\nBracing(selestina)\nDetest(selestina, jon)\nforall x (Obligate(x) -> Detest(x, selestina))\nforall x (Screak(x, jon) -> Verified(jon))\nforall x (Obligate(x) and Reef(x, jon) -> Bracing(x))\nforall x (Bracing(x) -> Reef(x, jon))\nforall x (Screak(x, selestina) and Verified(x) -> Reef(x, jon))\nforall x (Detest(x, selestina) and Moraceous(x) -> Screak(selestina, jon))\nforall x (Screak(x, selestina) and Bracing(selestina) -> Moraceous(selestina))\nforall x (Detest(x, jon) and Detest(jon, selestina) -> Moraceous(x))\n\nDetest(jon, jon)\n\nDetest(jon, jon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The maurits maim the jimmy. The maurits coif the jimmy. The maurits is caecilian. The maurits silhouette the jimmy. The jimmy is gradable. The jimmy is unawakened. The jimmy silhouette the maurits. If something is sneak then it silhouette the jimmy. If something maim the maurits then the maurits is gradable. If something is sneak and it coif the maurits then it is unawakened. If something is unawakened then it coif the maurits. If something maim the jimmy and it is gradable then it coif the maurits. If something silhouette the jimmy and it is caecilian then the jimmy maim the maurits. If something maim the jimmy and the jimmy is unawakened then the jimmy is caecilian. If something silhouette the maurits and the maurits silhouette the jimmy then it is caecilian. The maurits is not sneak.", "logic": "\nMaim(maurits, jimmy)\nCoif(maurits, jimmy)\nCaecilian(maurits)\nSilhouette(maurits, jimmy)\nGradable(jimmy)\nUnawakened(jimmy)\nSilhouette(jimmy, maurits)\nforall x (Sneak(x) -> Silhouette(x, jimmy))\nforall x (Maim(x, maurits) -> Gradable(maurits))\nforall x (Sneak(x) and Coif(x, maurits) -> Unawakened(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Coif(x, maurits))\nforall x (Maim(x, jimmy) and Gradable(x) -> Coif(x, maurits))\nforall x (Silhouette(x, jimmy) and Caecilian(x) -> Maim(jimmy, maurits))\nforall x (Maim(x, jimmy) and Unawakened(jimmy) -> Caecilian(jimmy))\nforall x (Silhouette(x, maurits) and Silhouette(maurits, jimmy) -> Caecilian(x))\n\nnot Sneak(maurits)\n\nnot Sneak(maurits) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The hersch supervene the ragnar. The hersch wrinkle the ragnar. The hersch is gregorian. The hersch confront the ragnar. The ragnar is balanced. The ragnar is interwoven. The ragnar confront the hersch. If something is permeant then it confront the ragnar. If something supervene the hersch then the hersch is balanced. If something is permeant and it wrinkle the hersch then it is interwoven. If something is interwoven then it wrinkle the hersch. If something supervene the ragnar and it is balanced then it wrinkle the hersch. If something confront the ragnar and it is gregorian then the ragnar supervene the hersch. If something supervene the ragnar and the ragnar is interwoven then the ragnar is gregorian. If something confront the hersch and the hersch confront the ragnar then it is gregorian. The hersch is round.", "logic": "\nSupervene(hersch, ragnar)\nWrinkle(hersch, ragnar)\nGregorian(hersch)\nConfront(hersch, ragnar)\nBalanced(ragnar)\nInterwoven(ragnar)\nConfront(ragnar, hersch)\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Confront(x, ragnar))\nforall x (Supervene(x, hersch) -> Balanced(hersch))\nforall x (Permeant(x) and Wrinkle(x, hersch) -> Interwoven(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) -> Wrinkle(x, hersch))\nforall x (Supervene(x, ragnar) and Balanced(x) -> Wrinkle(x, hersch))\nforall x (Confront(x, ragnar) and Gregorian(x) -> Supervene(ragnar, hersch))\nforall x (Supervene(x, ragnar) and Interwoven(ragnar) -> Gregorian(ragnar))\nforall x (Confront(x, hersch) and Confront(hersch, ragnar) -> Gregorian(x))\n\nRound(hersch)\n\nRound(hersch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The esteban thermostat the donn. The esteban soundproof the donn. The esteban is leading. The esteban blacklead the donn. The donn is whirring. The donn is undutiful. The donn blacklead the esteban. If something is assessable then it blacklead the donn. If something thermostat the esteban then the esteban is whirring. If something is assessable and it soundproof the esteban then it is undutiful. If something is undutiful then it soundproof the esteban. If something thermostat the donn and it is whirring then it soundproof the esteban. If something blacklead the donn and it is leading then the donn thermostat the esteban. If something thermostat the donn and the donn is undutiful then the donn is leading. If something blacklead the esteban and the esteban blacklead the donn then it is leading. The esteban does not chase the esteban.", "logic": "\nThermostat(esteban, donn)\nSoundproof(esteban, donn)\nLeading(esteban)\nBlacklead(esteban, donn)\nWhirring(donn)\nUndutiful(donn)\nBlacklead(donn, esteban)\nforall x (Assessable(x) -> Blacklead(x, donn))\nforall x (Thermostat(x, esteban) -> Whirring(esteban))\nforall x (Assessable(x) and Soundproof(x, esteban) -> Undutiful(x))\nforall x (Undutiful(x) -> Soundproof(x, esteban))\nforall x (Thermostat(x, donn) and Whirring(x) -> Soundproof(x, esteban))\nforall x (Blacklead(x, donn) and Leading(x) -> Thermostat(donn, esteban))\nforall x (Thermostat(x, donn) and Undutiful(donn) -> Leading(donn))\nforall x (Blacklead(x, esteban) and Blacklead(esteban, donn) -> Leading(x))\n\nnot Thermostat(esteban, esteban)\n\nnot Thermostat(esteban, esteban) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The ferdy tile the lyndon. The ferdy frap the lyndon. The ferdy is tipped. The ferdy gaol the lyndon. The lyndon is unraised. The lyndon is diabatic. The lyndon gaol the ferdy. If something is excrescent then it gaol the lyndon. If something tile the ferdy then the ferdy is unraised. If something is excrescent and it frap the ferdy then it is diabatic. If something is diabatic then it frap the ferdy. If something tile the lyndon and it is unraised then it frap the ferdy. If something gaol the lyndon and it is tipped then the lyndon tile the ferdy. If something tile the lyndon and the lyndon is diabatic then the lyndon is tipped. If something gaol the ferdy and the ferdy gaol the lyndon then it is tipped. The lyndon is round.", "logic": "\nTile(ferdy, lyndon)\nFrap(ferdy, lyndon)\nTipped(ferdy)\nGaol(ferdy, lyndon)\nUnraised(lyndon)\nDiabatic(lyndon)\nGaol(lyndon, ferdy)\nforall x (Excrescent(x) -> Gaol(x, lyndon))\nforall x (Tile(x, ferdy) -> Unraised(ferdy))\nforall x (Excrescent(x) and Frap(x, ferdy) -> Diabatic(x))\nforall x (Diabatic(x) -> Frap(x, ferdy))\nforall x (Tile(x, lyndon) and Unraised(x) -> Frap(x, ferdy))\nforall x (Gaol(x, lyndon) and Tipped(x) -> Tile(lyndon, ferdy))\nforall x (Tile(x, lyndon) and Diabatic(lyndon) -> Tipped(lyndon))\nforall x (Gaol(x, ferdy) and Gaol(ferdy, lyndon) -> Tipped(x))\n\nRound(lyndon)\n\nRound(lyndon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Riki is bullish. Riki is reversive. Weylin is mental. Weylin is not encouraged. Kaleb is plumaged. Forbes is mental. Forbes is bullish. If Weylin is encouraged and Weylin is plumaged then Weylin is reversive. If Kaleb is whacky then Kaleb is not plumaged. All reversive things are plumaged. All whacky things are not reversive. Cold things are mental. If Riki is not encouraged then Riki is plumaged. If Forbes is encouraged and Forbes is whacky then Forbes is bullish. If something is reversive and mental then it is not whacky. Weylin is mental.", "logic": "\nBullish(riki)\nReversive(riki)\nMental(weylin)\nnot Encouraged(weylin)\nPlumaged(kaleb)\nMental(forbes)\nBullish(forbes)\nEncouraged(weylin) and Plumaged(weylin) -> Reversive(weylin)\nWhacky(kaleb) -> not Plumaged(kaleb)\nforall x (Reversive(x) -> Plumaged(x))\nforall x (Whacky(x) -> not Reversive(x))\nforall x (Plumaged(x) -> Mental(x))\nnot Encouraged(riki) -> Plumaged(riki)\nEncouraged(forbes) and Whacky(forbes) -> Bullish(forbes)\nforall x (Reversive(x) and Mental(x) -> not Whacky(x))\n\nMental(weylin)\n\ntherefore Mental(weylin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Maxine is redeemed. Maxine is springless. Therine is catty. Therine is not disguised. Vance is hindermost. Erena is catty. Erena is redeemed. If Therine is disguised and Therine is hindermost then Therine is springless. If Vance is panoplied then Vance is not hindermost. All springless things are hindermost. All panoplied things are not springless. Cold things are catty. If Maxine is not disguised then Maxine is hindermost. If Erena is disguised and Erena is panoplied then Erena is redeemed. If something is springless and catty then it is not panoplied. Erena is not catty.", "logic": "\nRedeemed(maxine)\nSpringless(maxine)\nCatty(therine)\nnot Disguised(therine)\nHindermost(vance)\nCatty(erena)\nRedeemed(erena)\nDisguised(therine) and Hindermost(therine) -> Springless(therine)\nPanoplied(vance) -> not Hindermost(vance)\nforall x (Springless(x) -> Hindermost(x))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> not Springless(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Catty(x))\nnot Disguised(maxine) -> Hindermost(maxine)\nDisguised(erena) and Panoplied(erena) -> Redeemed(erena)\nforall x (Springless(x) and Catty(x) -> not Panoplied(x))\n\nnot Catty(erena)\n\ntherefore Catty(erena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Raynell is accusive. Raynell is musing. Brooke is guardant. Brooke is not scratchy. Maddi is garbled. Elicia is guardant. Elicia is accusive. If Brooke is scratchy and Brooke is garbled then Brooke is musing. If Maddi is loth then Maddi is not garbled. All musing things are garbled. All loth things are not musing. Cold things are guardant. If Raynell is not scratchy then Raynell is garbled. If Elicia is scratchy and Elicia is loth then Elicia is accusive. If something is musing and guardant then it is not loth. Maddi is guardant.", "logic": "\nAccusive(raynell)\nMusing(raynell)\nGuardant(brooke)\nnot Scratchy(brooke)\nGarbled(maddi)\nGuardant(elicia)\nAccusive(elicia)\nScratchy(brooke) and Garbled(brooke) -> Musing(brooke)\nLoth(maddi) -> not Garbled(maddi)\nforall x (Musing(x) -> Garbled(x))\nforall x (Loth(x) -> not Musing(x))\nforall x (Garbled(x) -> Guardant(x))\nnot Scratchy(raynell) -> Garbled(raynell)\nScratchy(elicia) and Loth(elicia) -> Accusive(elicia)\nforall x (Musing(x) and Guardant(x) -> not Loth(x))\n\nGuardant(maddi)\n\nGarbled(maddi) and forall x (Garbled(x) -> Guardant(x)) -> therefore Guardant(maddi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Jerzy is unspecific. Jerzy is concerted. Lilia is talky. Lilia is not stannous. Smith is quaternary. Torin is talky. Torin is unspecific. If Lilia is stannous and Lilia is quaternary then Lilia is concerted. If Smith is penniless then Smith is not quaternary. All concerted things are quaternary. All penniless things are not concerted. Cold things are talky. If Jerzy is not stannous then Jerzy is quaternary. If Torin is stannous and Torin is penniless then Torin is unspecific. If something is concerted and talky then it is not penniless. Jerzy is not quaternary.", "logic": "\nUnspecific(jerzy)\nConcerted(jerzy)\nTalky(lilia)\nnot Stannous(lilia)\nQuaternary(smith)\nTalky(torin)\nUnspecific(torin)\nStannous(lilia) and Quaternary(lilia) -> Concerted(lilia)\nPenniless(smith) -> not Quaternary(smith)\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Quaternary(x))\nforall x (Penniless(x) -> not Concerted(x))\nforall x (Quaternary(x) -> Talky(x))\nnot Stannous(jerzy) -> Quaternary(jerzy)\nStannous(torin) and Penniless(torin) -> Unspecific(torin)\nforall x (Concerted(x) and Talky(x) -> not Penniless(x))\n\nnot Quaternary(jerzy)\n\nConcerted(jerzy) and forall x (Concerted(x) -> Quaternary(x)) -> therefore Quaternary(jerzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Fayette is remindful. Fayette is quantized. Ruby is resinated. Ruby is not delirious. Nela is expiative. Annamarie is resinated. Annamarie is remindful. If Ruby is delirious and Ruby is expiative then Ruby is quantized. If Nela is scopal then Nela is not expiative. All quantized things are expiative. All scopal things are not quantized. Cold things are resinated. If Fayette is not delirious then Fayette is expiative. If Annamarie is delirious and Annamarie is scopal then Annamarie is remindful. If something is quantized and resinated then it is not scopal. Fayette is resinated.", "logic": "\nRemindful(fayette)\nQuantized(fayette)\nResinated(ruby)\nnot Delirious(ruby)\nExpiative(nela)\nResinated(annamarie)\nRemindful(annamarie)\nDelirious(ruby) and Expiative(ruby) -> Quantized(ruby)\nScopal(nela) -> not Expiative(nela)\nforall x (Quantized(x) -> Expiative(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> not Quantized(x))\nforall x (Expiative(x) -> Resinated(x))\nnot Delirious(fayette) -> Expiative(fayette)\nDelirious(annamarie) and Scopal(annamarie) -> Remindful(annamarie)\nforall x (Quantized(x) and Resinated(x) -> not Scopal(x))\n\nResinated(fayette)\n\nQuantized(fayette) and forall x (Quantized(x) -> Expiative(x)) -> therefore Expiative(fayette) Expiative(fayette) and forall x (Expiative(x) -> Resinated(x)) -> therefore Resinated(fayette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Alberto is flippant. Alberto is rolling. Nicolas is partizan. Nicolas is not leathered. Kurtis is jowly. Shamit is partizan. Shamit is flippant. If Nicolas is leathered and Nicolas is jowly then Nicolas is rolling. If Kurtis is prevalent then Kurtis is not jowly. All rolling things are jowly. All prevalent things are not rolling. Cold things are partizan. If Alberto is not leathered then Alberto is jowly. If Shamit is leathered and Shamit is prevalent then Shamit is flippant. If something is rolling and partizan then it is not prevalent. Alberto is not partizan.", "logic": "\nFlippant(alberto)\nRolling(alberto)\nPartizan(nicolas)\nnot Leathered(nicolas)\nJowly(kurtis)\nPartizan(shamit)\nFlippant(shamit)\nLeathered(nicolas) and Jowly(nicolas) -> Rolling(nicolas)\nPrevalent(kurtis) -> not Jowly(kurtis)\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Jowly(x))\nforall x (Prevalent(x) -> not Rolling(x))\nforall x (Jowly(x) -> Partizan(x))\nnot Leathered(alberto) -> Jowly(alberto)\nLeathered(shamit) and Prevalent(shamit) -> Flippant(shamit)\nforall x (Rolling(x) and Partizan(x) -> not Prevalent(x))\n\nnot Partizan(alberto)\n\nRolling(alberto) and forall x (Rolling(x) -> Jowly(x)) -> therefore Jowly(alberto) Jowly(alberto) and forall x (Jowly(x) -> Partizan(x)) -> therefore Partizan(alberto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Velvet is nautical. Velvet is demonic. Odilia is westerly. Odilia is not adulterine. Rena is springless. Connie is westerly. Connie is nautical. If Odilia is adulterine and Odilia is springless then Odilia is demonic. If Rena is planktonic then Rena is not springless. All demonic things are springless. All planktonic things are not demonic. Cold things are westerly. If Velvet is not adulterine then Velvet is springless. If Connie is adulterine and Connie is planktonic then Connie is nautical. If something is demonic and westerly then it is not planktonic. Velvet is not planktonic.", "logic": "\nNautical(velvet)\nDemonic(velvet)\nWesterly(odilia)\nnot Adulterine(odilia)\nSpringless(rena)\nWesterly(connie)\nNautical(connie)\nAdulterine(odilia) and Springless(odilia) -> Demonic(odilia)\nPlanktonic(rena) -> not Springless(rena)\nforall x (Demonic(x) -> Springless(x))\nforall x (Planktonic(x) -> not Demonic(x))\nforall x (Springless(x) -> Westerly(x))\nnot Adulterine(velvet) -> Springless(velvet)\nAdulterine(connie) and Planktonic(connie) -> Nautical(connie)\nforall x (Demonic(x) and Westerly(x) -> not Planktonic(x))\n\nnot Planktonic(velvet)\n\nDemonic(velvet) and forall x (Demonic(x) -> Springless(x)) -> therefore Springless(velvet) Springless(velvet) and forall x (Springless(x) -> Westerly(x)) -> therefore Westerly(velvet) Demonic(velvet) and Westerly(velvet) and forall x (Demonic(x) and Westerly(x) -> not Planktonic(x)) -> therefore not Planktonic(velvet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Kirstyn is cutaneous. Kirstyn is algal. Charles is licenced. Charles is not abandoned. Janis is fawning. Gwenette is licenced. Gwenette is cutaneous. If Charles is abandoned and Charles is fawning then Charles is algal. If Janis is anguine then Janis is not fawning. All algal things are fawning. All anguine things are not algal. Cold things are licenced. If Kirstyn is not abandoned then Kirstyn is fawning. If Gwenette is abandoned and Gwenette is anguine then Gwenette is cutaneous. If something is algal and licenced then it is not anguine. Kirstyn is anguine.", "logic": "\nCutaneous(kirstyn)\nAlgal(kirstyn)\nLicenced(charles)\nnot Abandoned(charles)\nFawning(janis)\nLicenced(gwenette)\nCutaneous(gwenette)\nAbandoned(charles) and Fawning(charles) -> Algal(charles)\nAnguine(janis) -> not Fawning(janis)\nforall x (Algal(x) -> Fawning(x))\nforall x (Anguine(x) -> not Algal(x))\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Licenced(x))\nnot Abandoned(kirstyn) -> Fawning(kirstyn)\nAbandoned(gwenette) and Anguine(gwenette) -> Cutaneous(gwenette)\nforall x (Algal(x) and Licenced(x) -> not Anguine(x))\n\nAnguine(kirstyn)\n\nAlgal(kirstyn) and forall x (Algal(x) -> Fawning(x)) -> therefore Fawning(kirstyn) Fawning(kirstyn) and forall x (Fawning(x) -> Licenced(x)) -> therefore Licenced(kirstyn) Algal(kirstyn) and Licenced(kirstyn) and forall x (Algal(x) and Licenced(x) -> not Anguine(x)) -> therefore not Anguine(kirstyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Nessy is viceregal. Nessy is grumose. Gallagher is earthlike. Gallagher is not cationic. Suzanne is screaky. Sapphira is earthlike. Sapphira is viceregal. If Gallagher is cationic and Gallagher is screaky then Gallagher is grumose. If Suzanne is abatable then Suzanne is not screaky. All grumose things are screaky. All abatable things are not grumose. Cold things are earthlike. If Nessy is not cationic then Nessy is screaky. If Sapphira is cationic and Sapphira is abatable then Sapphira is viceregal. If something is grumose and earthlike then it is not abatable. Gallagher is not screaky.", "logic": "\nViceregal(nessy)\nGrumose(nessy)\nEarthlike(gallagher)\nnot Cationic(gallagher)\nScreaky(suzanne)\nEarthlike(sapphira)\nViceregal(sapphira)\nCationic(gallagher) and Screaky(gallagher) -> Grumose(gallagher)\nAbatable(suzanne) -> not Screaky(suzanne)\nforall x (Grumose(x) -> Screaky(x))\nforall x (Abatable(x) -> not Grumose(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Earthlike(x))\nnot Cationic(nessy) -> Screaky(nessy)\nCationic(sapphira) and Abatable(sapphira) -> Viceregal(sapphira)\nforall x (Grumose(x) and Earthlike(x) -> not Abatable(x))\n\nnot Screaky(gallagher)\n\nforall x (Grumose(x) -> Screaky(x)) <- Cationic(gallagher) and Screaky(gallagher) -> Grumose(gallagher) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Berni is canonized. Berni is variegated. Mala is curving. Mala is not actual. Emmie is imprecise. Augustin is curving. Augustin is canonized. If Mala is actual and Mala is imprecise then Mala is variegated. If Emmie is unpeopled then Emmie is not imprecise. All variegated things are imprecise. All unpeopled things are not variegated. Cold things are curving. If Berni is not actual then Berni is imprecise. If Augustin is actual and Augustin is unpeopled then Augustin is canonized. If something is variegated and curving then it is not unpeopled. Augustin is imprecise.", "logic": "\nCanonized(berni)\nVariegated(berni)\nCurving(mala)\nnot Actual(mala)\nImprecise(emmie)\nCurving(augustin)\nCanonized(augustin)\nActual(mala) and Imprecise(mala) -> Variegated(mala)\nUnpeopled(emmie) -> not Imprecise(emmie)\nforall x (Variegated(x) -> Imprecise(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) -> not Variegated(x))\nforall x (Imprecise(x) -> Curving(x))\nnot Actual(berni) -> Imprecise(berni)\nActual(augustin) and Unpeopled(augustin) -> Canonized(augustin)\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Curving(x) -> not Unpeopled(x))\n\nImprecise(augustin)\n\nforall x (Variegated(x) -> Imprecise(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Manfred is rheumatic. Manfred is awing. Margi is outer. Margi is not glottal. Carlisle is sudanese. Darcie is outer. Darcie is rheumatic. If Margi is glottal and Margi is sudanese then Margi is awing. If Carlisle is accursed then Carlisle is not sudanese. All awing things are sudanese. All accursed things are not awing. Cold things are outer. If Manfred is not glottal then Manfred is sudanese. If Darcie is glottal and Darcie is accursed then Darcie is rheumatic. If something is awing and outer then it is not accursed. Margi is not awing.", "logic": "\nRheumatic(manfred)\nAwing(manfred)\nOuter(margi)\nnot Glottal(margi)\nSudanese(carlisle)\nOuter(darcie)\nRheumatic(darcie)\nGlottal(margi) and Sudanese(margi) -> Awing(margi)\nAccursed(carlisle) -> not Sudanese(carlisle)\nforall x (Awing(x) -> Sudanese(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> not Awing(x))\nforall x (Sudanese(x) -> Outer(x))\nnot Glottal(manfred) -> Sudanese(manfred)\nGlottal(darcie) and Accursed(darcie) -> Rheumatic(darcie)\nforall x (Awing(x) and Outer(x) -> not Accursed(x))\n\nnot Awing(margi)\n\nGlottal(margi) and Sudanese(margi) -> Awing(margi) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Erastus is underbred. Erastus is related. Stacee is grateful. Stacee is not respectful. Partha is effete. Seka is grateful. Seka is underbred. If Stacee is respectful and Stacee is effete then Stacee is related. If Partha is assuming then Partha is not effete. All related things are effete. All assuming things are not related. Cold things are grateful. If Erastus is not respectful then Erastus is effete. If Seka is respectful and Seka is assuming then Seka is underbred. If something is related and grateful then it is not assuming. Stacee is assuming.", "logic": "\nUnderbred(erastus)\nRelated(erastus)\nGrateful(stacee)\nnot Respectful(stacee)\nEffete(partha)\nGrateful(seka)\nUnderbred(seka)\nRespectful(stacee) and Effete(stacee) -> Related(stacee)\nAssuming(partha) -> not Effete(partha)\nforall x (Related(x) -> Effete(x))\nforall x (Assuming(x) -> not Related(x))\nforall x (Effete(x) -> Grateful(x))\nnot Respectful(erastus) -> Effete(erastus)\nRespectful(seka) and Assuming(seka) -> Underbred(seka)\nforall x (Related(x) and Grateful(x) -> not Assuming(x))\n\nAssuming(stacee)\n\nAssuming(stacee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Ayn is thrilled. Ayn is achromic. Barbi is adjuratory. Barbi is not sexy. Thia is aneuploid. Aggie is adjuratory. Aggie is thrilled. If Barbi is sexy and Barbi is aneuploid then Barbi is achromic. If Thia is forfeit then Thia is not aneuploid. All achromic things are aneuploid. All forfeit things are not achromic. Cold things are adjuratory. If Ayn is not sexy then Ayn is aneuploid. If Aggie is sexy and Aggie is forfeit then Aggie is thrilled. If something is achromic and adjuratory then it is not forfeit. Ayn is not red.", "logic": "\nThrilled(ayn)\nAchromic(ayn)\nAdjuratory(barbi)\nnot Sexy(barbi)\nAneuploid(thia)\nAdjuratory(aggie)\nThrilled(aggie)\nSexy(barbi) and Aneuploid(barbi) -> Achromic(barbi)\nForfeit(thia) -> not Aneuploid(thia)\nforall x (Achromic(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) -> not Achromic(x))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Adjuratory(x))\nnot Sexy(ayn) -> Aneuploid(ayn)\nSexy(aggie) and Forfeit(aggie) -> Thrilled(aggie)\nforall x (Achromic(x) and Adjuratory(x) -> not Forfeit(x))\n\nnot Red(ayn)\n\nnot Red(ayn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Cristine is dramatic. Cristine is ergonomic. Teodoor is ionic. Teodoor is not undershot. Pearce is dioecious. Wallie is ionic. Wallie is dramatic. If Teodoor is undershot and Teodoor is dioecious then Teodoor is ergonomic. If Pearce is observant then Pearce is not dioecious. All ergonomic things are dioecious. All observant things are not ergonomic. Cold things are ionic. If Cristine is not undershot then Cristine is dioecious. If Wallie is undershot and Wallie is observant then Wallie is dramatic. If something is ergonomic and ionic then it is not observant. Pearce is red.", "logic": "\nDramatic(cristine)\nErgonomic(cristine)\nIonic(teodoor)\nnot Undershot(teodoor)\nDioecious(pearce)\nIonic(wallie)\nDramatic(wallie)\nUndershot(teodoor) and Dioecious(teodoor) -> Ergonomic(teodoor)\nObservant(pearce) -> not Dioecious(pearce)\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) -> not Ergonomic(x))\nforall x (Dioecious(x) -> Ionic(x))\nnot Undershot(cristine) -> Dioecious(cristine)\nUndershot(wallie) and Observant(wallie) -> Dramatic(wallie)\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) and Ionic(x) -> not Observant(x))\n\nRed(pearce)\n\nRed(pearce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Kin is eremitical. Kin is through. Caryn is slavish. Caryn is not gnarly. Shannon is porose. Janina is slavish. Janina is eremitical. If Caryn is gnarly and Caryn is porose then Caryn is through. If Shannon is boskopoid then Shannon is not porose. All through things are porose. All boskopoid things are not through. Cold things are slavish. If Kin is not gnarly then Kin is porose. If Janina is gnarly and Janina is boskopoid then Janina is eremitical. If something is through and slavish then it is not boskopoid. Shannon is not boskopoid.", "logic": "\nEremitical(kin)\nThrough(kin)\nSlavish(caryn)\nnot Gnarly(caryn)\nPorose(shannon)\nSlavish(janina)\nEremitical(janina)\nGnarly(caryn) and Porose(caryn) -> Through(caryn)\nBoskopoid(shannon) -> not Porose(shannon)\nforall x (Through(x) -> Porose(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> not Through(x))\nforall x (Porose(x) -> Slavish(x))\nnot Gnarly(kin) -> Porose(kin)\nGnarly(janina) and Boskopoid(janina) -> Eremitical(janina)\nforall x (Through(x) and Slavish(x) -> not Boskopoid(x))\n\nnot Boskopoid(shannon)\n\nnot Boskopoid(shannon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Carlina is lviii. Carlina is peckish. Fancy is remediable. Fancy is not chiseled. Dorree is punitory. Gabey is remediable. Gabey is lviii. If Fancy is chiseled and Fancy is punitory then Fancy is peckish. If Dorree is plush then Dorree is not punitory. All peckish things are punitory. All plush things are not peckish. Cold things are remediable. If Carlina is not chiseled then Carlina is punitory. If Gabey is chiseled and Gabey is plush then Gabey is lviii. If something is peckish and remediable then it is not plush. Dorree is chiseled.", "logic": "\nLviii(carlina)\nPeckish(carlina)\nRemediable(fancy)\nnot Chiseled(fancy)\nPunitory(dorree)\nRemediable(gabey)\nLviii(gabey)\nChiseled(fancy) and Punitory(fancy) -> Peckish(fancy)\nPlush(dorree) -> not Punitory(dorree)\nforall x (Peckish(x) -> Punitory(x))\nforall x (Plush(x) -> not Peckish(x))\nforall x (Punitory(x) -> Remediable(x))\nnot Chiseled(carlina) -> Punitory(carlina)\nChiseled(gabey) and Plush(gabey) -> Lviii(gabey)\nforall x (Peckish(x) and Remediable(x) -> not Plush(x))\n\nChiseled(dorree)\n\nChiseled(dorree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Valerie is not catalan. Valerie is doglike. Delores is fettered. Delores is doglike. Delores is priapic. Delores is furthest. Trudy is lifesize. Trudy is catalan. Trudy is priapic. Trudy is furthest. Rosalyn is fettered. Rosalyn is doglike. Furry things are fettered. If something is fettered then it is flippant. All fettered, lifesize things are flippant. If something is doglike and not catalan then it is furthest. Furry, flippant things are doglike. All furthest things are priapic. If something is catalan and not furthest then it is priapic. All flippant things are priapic. Delores is doglike.", "logic": "\nnot Catalan(valerie)\nDoglike(valerie)\nFettered(delores)\nDoglike(delores)\nPriapic(delores)\nFurthest(delores)\nLifesize(trudy)\nCatalan(trudy)\nPriapic(trudy)\nFurthest(trudy)\nFettered(rosalyn)\nDoglike(rosalyn)\nforall x (Lifesize(x) -> Fettered(x))\nforall x (Fettered(x) -> Flippant(x))\nforall x (Fettered(x) and Lifesize(x) -> Flippant(x))\nforall x (Doglike(x) and not Catalan(x) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Lifesize(x) and Flippant(x) -> Doglike(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Catalan(x) and not Furthest(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Flippant(x) -> Priapic(x))\n\nDoglike(delores)\n\ntherefore Doglike(delores)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Ethelda is not tumescent. Ethelda is dowered. Meris is wretched. Meris is dowered. Meris is humanistic. Meris is bullish. Solomon is sinistral. Solomon is tumescent. Solomon is humanistic. Solomon is bullish. Ophelia is wretched. Ophelia is dowered. Furry things are wretched. If something is wretched then it is unarguable. All wretched, sinistral things are unarguable. If something is dowered and not tumescent then it is bullish. Furry, unarguable things are dowered. All bullish things are humanistic. If something is tumescent and not bullish then it is humanistic. All unarguable things are humanistic. Ophelia is not wretched.", "logic": "\nnot Tumescent(ethelda)\nDowered(ethelda)\nWretched(meris)\nDowered(meris)\nHumanistic(meris)\nBullish(meris)\nSinistral(solomon)\nTumescent(solomon)\nHumanistic(solomon)\nBullish(solomon)\nWretched(ophelia)\nDowered(ophelia)\nforall x (Sinistral(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Wretched(x) -> Unarguable(x))\nforall x (Wretched(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Unarguable(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) and not Tumescent(x) -> Bullish(x))\nforall x (Sinistral(x) and Unarguable(x) -> Dowered(x))\nforall x (Bullish(x) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) and not Bullish(x) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Unarguable(x) -> Humanistic(x))\n\nnot Wretched(ophelia)\n\ntherefore Wretched(ophelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Ilene is not infertile. Ilene is elliptical. Hollis is annoyed. Hollis is elliptical. Hollis is gaussian. Hollis is drenched. Nerti is unpriestly. Nerti is infertile. Nerti is gaussian. Nerti is drenched. Barrett is annoyed. Barrett is elliptical. Furry things are annoyed. If something is annoyed then it is tamed. All annoyed, unpriestly things are tamed. If something is elliptical and not infertile then it is drenched. Furry, tamed things are elliptical. All drenched things are gaussian. If something is infertile and not drenched then it is gaussian. All tamed things are gaussian. Barrett is tamed.", "logic": "\nnot Infertile(ilene)\nElliptical(ilene)\nAnnoyed(hollis)\nElliptical(hollis)\nGaussian(hollis)\nDrenched(hollis)\nUnpriestly(nerti)\nInfertile(nerti)\nGaussian(nerti)\nDrenched(nerti)\nAnnoyed(barrett)\nElliptical(barrett)\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Tamed(x))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) and Unpriestly(x) -> Tamed(x))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) and not Infertile(x) -> Drenched(x))\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and Tamed(x) -> Elliptical(x))\nforall x (Drenched(x) -> Gaussian(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) and not Drenched(x) -> Gaussian(x))\nforall x (Tamed(x) -> Gaussian(x))\n\nTamed(barrett)\n\nAnnoyed(barrett) and forall x (Annoyed(x) -> Tamed(x)) -> therefore Tamed(barrett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Mariana is not fond. Mariana is bacterioid. Leonore is victimised. Leonore is bacterioid. Leonore is hurt. Leonore is model. Nelli is affixed. Nelli is fond. Nelli is hurt. Nelli is model. Yaakov is victimised. Yaakov is bacterioid. Furry things are victimised. If something is victimised then it is petty. All victimised, affixed things are petty. If something is bacterioid and not fond then it is model. Furry, petty things are bacterioid. All model things are hurt. If something is fond and not model then it is hurt. All petty things are hurt. Nelli is not victimised.", "logic": "\nnot Fond(mariana)\nBacterioid(mariana)\nVictimised(leonore)\nBacterioid(leonore)\nHurt(leonore)\nModel(leonore)\nAffixed(nelli)\nFond(nelli)\nHurt(nelli)\nModel(nelli)\nVictimised(yaakov)\nBacterioid(yaakov)\nforall x (Affixed(x) -> Victimised(x))\nforall x (Victimised(x) -> Petty(x))\nforall x (Victimised(x) and Affixed(x) -> Petty(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and not Fond(x) -> Model(x))\nforall x (Affixed(x) and Petty(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Model(x) -> Hurt(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) and not Model(x) -> Hurt(x))\nforall x (Petty(x) -> Hurt(x))\n\nnot Victimised(nelli)\n\nAffixed(nelli) and forall x (Affixed(x) -> Victimised(x)) -> therefore Victimised(nelli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Rad is not clinical. Rad is supervised. Jonathan is unpriestly. Jonathan is supervised. Jonathan is heraldist. Jonathan is clanking. Chandal is tipped. Chandal is clinical. Chandal is heraldist. Chandal is clanking. Carly is unpriestly. Carly is supervised. Furry things are unpriestly. If something is unpriestly then it is slopped. All unpriestly, tipped things are slopped. If something is supervised and not clinical then it is clanking. Furry, slopped things are supervised. All clanking things are heraldist. If something is clinical and not clanking then it is heraldist. All slopped things are heraldist. Carly is heraldist.", "logic": "\nnot Clinical(rad)\nSupervised(rad)\nUnpriestly(jonathan)\nSupervised(jonathan)\nHeraldist(jonathan)\nClanking(jonathan)\nTipped(chandal)\nClinical(chandal)\nHeraldist(chandal)\nClanking(chandal)\nUnpriestly(carly)\nSupervised(carly)\nforall x (Tipped(x) -> Unpriestly(x))\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) -> Slopped(x))\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and Tipped(x) -> Slopped(x))\nforall x (Supervised(x) and not Clinical(x) -> Clanking(x))\nforall x (Tipped(x) and Slopped(x) -> Supervised(x))\nforall x (Clanking(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nforall x (Clinical(x) and not Clanking(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nforall x (Slopped(x) -> Heraldist(x))\n\nHeraldist(carly)\n\nUnpriestly(carly) and forall x (Unpriestly(x) -> Slopped(x)) -> therefore Slopped(carly) Slopped(carly) and forall x (Slopped(x) -> Heraldist(x)) -> therefore Heraldist(carly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Vikky is not morbid. Vikky is desiccated. Delinda is recyclable. Delinda is desiccated. Delinda is concurrent. Delinda is eloquent. Maurita is acellular. Maurita is morbid. Maurita is concurrent. Maurita is eloquent. Otto is recyclable. Otto is desiccated. Furry things are recyclable. If something is recyclable then it is seemly. All recyclable, acellular things are seemly. If something is desiccated and not morbid then it is eloquent. Furry, seemly things are desiccated. All eloquent things are concurrent. If something is morbid and not eloquent then it is concurrent. All seemly things are concurrent. Maurita is not seemly.", "logic": "\nnot Morbid(vikky)\nDesiccated(vikky)\nRecyclable(delinda)\nDesiccated(delinda)\nConcurrent(delinda)\nEloquent(delinda)\nAcellular(maurita)\nMorbid(maurita)\nConcurrent(maurita)\nEloquent(maurita)\nRecyclable(otto)\nDesiccated(otto)\nforall x (Acellular(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) -> Seemly(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) and Acellular(x) -> Seemly(x))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and not Morbid(x) -> Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Acellular(x) and Seemly(x) -> Desiccated(x))\nforall x (Eloquent(x) -> Concurrent(x))\nforall x (Morbid(x) and not Eloquent(x) -> Concurrent(x))\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> Concurrent(x))\n\nnot Seemly(maurita)\n\nAcellular(maurita) and forall x (Acellular(x) -> Recyclable(x)) -> therefore Recyclable(maurita) Recyclable(maurita) and forall x (Recyclable(x) -> Seemly(x)) -> therefore Seemly(maurita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Levin is not unpermed. Levin is senile. Korrie is acephalous. Korrie is senile. Korrie is declared. Korrie is subdued. Ivie is neoliberal. Ivie is unpermed. Ivie is declared. Ivie is subdued. Winonah is acephalous. Winonah is senile. Furry things are acephalous. If something is acephalous then it is dateable. All acephalous, neoliberal things are dateable. If something is senile and not unpermed then it is subdued. Furry, dateable things are senile. All subdued things are declared. If something is unpermed and not subdued then it is declared. All dateable things are declared. Ivie is senile.", "logic": "\nnot Unpermed(levin)\nSenile(levin)\nAcephalous(korrie)\nSenile(korrie)\nDeclared(korrie)\nSubdued(korrie)\nNeoliberal(ivie)\nUnpermed(ivie)\nDeclared(ivie)\nSubdued(ivie)\nAcephalous(winonah)\nSenile(winonah)\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Acephalous(x))\nforall x (Acephalous(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Acephalous(x) and Neoliberal(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) and not Unpermed(x) -> Subdued(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Dateable(x) -> Senile(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Declared(x))\nforall x (Unpermed(x) and not Subdued(x) -> Declared(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Declared(x))\n\nSenile(ivie)\n\nNeoliberal(ivie) and forall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Acephalous(x)) -> therefore Acephalous(ivie) Acephalous(ivie) and forall x (Acephalous(x) -> Dateable(x)) -> therefore Dateable(ivie) Neoliberal(ivie) and Dateable(ivie) and forall x (Neoliberal(x) and Dateable(x) -> Senile(x)) -> therefore Senile(ivie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Meriel is not shared. Meriel is alone. Trevor is trancelike. Trevor is alone. Trevor is sorbed. Trevor is debonair. Mathilde is lustrous. Mathilde is shared. Mathilde is sorbed. Mathilde is debonair. Gussy is trancelike. Gussy is alone. Furry things are trancelike. If something is trancelike then it is exportable. All trancelike, lustrous things are exportable. If something is alone and not shared then it is debonair. Furry, exportable things are alone. All debonair things are sorbed. If something is shared and not debonair then it is sorbed. All exportable things are sorbed. Mathilde is not alone.", "logic": "\nnot Shared(meriel)\nAlone(meriel)\nTrancelike(trevor)\nAlone(trevor)\nSorbed(trevor)\nDebonair(trevor)\nLustrous(mathilde)\nShared(mathilde)\nSorbed(mathilde)\nDebonair(mathilde)\nTrancelike(gussy)\nAlone(gussy)\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Exportable(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) and Lustrous(x) -> Exportable(x))\nforall x (Alone(x) and not Shared(x) -> Debonair(x))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) and Exportable(x) -> Alone(x))\nforall x (Debonair(x) -> Sorbed(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) and not Debonair(x) -> Sorbed(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) -> Sorbed(x))\n\nnot Alone(mathilde)\n\nLustrous(mathilde) and forall x (Lustrous(x) -> Trancelike(x)) -> therefore Trancelike(mathilde) Trancelike(mathilde) and forall x (Trancelike(x) -> Exportable(x)) -> therefore Exportable(mathilde) Lustrous(mathilde) and Exportable(mathilde) and forall x (Lustrous(x) and Exportable(x) -> Alone(x)) -> therefore Alone(mathilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Tildi is not fourteenth. Tildi is lovesome. Carine is panicled. Carine is lovesome. Carine is agile. Carine is molten. Orsa is chief. Orsa is fourteenth. Orsa is agile. Orsa is molten. Yonina is panicled. Yonina is lovesome. Furry things are panicled. If something is panicled then it is dishonest. All panicled, chief things are dishonest. If something is lovesome and not fourteenth then it is molten. Furry, dishonest things are lovesome. All molten things are agile. If something is fourteenth and not molten then it is agile. All dishonest things are agile. Yonina is not molten.", "logic": "\nnot Fourteenth(tildi)\nLovesome(tildi)\nPanicled(carine)\nLovesome(carine)\nAgile(carine)\nMolten(carine)\nChief(orsa)\nFourteenth(orsa)\nAgile(orsa)\nMolten(orsa)\nPanicled(yonina)\nLovesome(yonina)\nforall x (Chief(x) -> Panicled(x))\nforall x (Panicled(x) -> Dishonest(x))\nforall x (Panicled(x) and Chief(x) -> Dishonest(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) and not Fourteenth(x) -> Molten(x))\nforall x (Chief(x) and Dishonest(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Agile(x))\nforall x (Fourteenth(x) and not Molten(x) -> Agile(x))\nforall x (Dishonest(x) -> Agile(x))\n\nnot Molten(yonina)\n\nforall x (Lovesome(x) and not Fourteenth(x) -> Molten(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Torin is not undesirous. Torin is concrete. Cornelius is consequent. Cornelius is concrete. Cornelius is pilotless. Cornelius is degressive. Gretal is cannibalic. Gretal is undesirous. Gretal is pilotless. Gretal is degressive. Angelika is consequent. Angelika is concrete. Furry things are consequent. If something is consequent then it is asthenic. All consequent, cannibalic things are asthenic. If something is concrete and not undesirous then it is degressive. Furry, asthenic things are concrete. All degressive things are pilotless. If something is undesirous and not degressive then it is pilotless. All asthenic things are pilotless. Torin is asthenic.", "logic": "\nnot Undesirous(torin)\nConcrete(torin)\nConsequent(cornelius)\nConcrete(cornelius)\nPilotless(cornelius)\nDegressive(cornelius)\nCannibalic(gretal)\nUndesirous(gretal)\nPilotless(gretal)\nDegressive(gretal)\nConsequent(angelika)\nConcrete(angelika)\nforall x (Cannibalic(x) -> Consequent(x))\nforall x (Consequent(x) -> Asthenic(x))\nforall x (Consequent(x) and Cannibalic(x) -> Asthenic(x))\nforall x (Concrete(x) and not Undesirous(x) -> Degressive(x))\nforall x (Cannibalic(x) and Asthenic(x) -> Concrete(x))\nforall x (Degressive(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nforall x (Undesirous(x) and not Degressive(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Pilotless(x))\n\nAsthenic(torin)\n\nforall x (Consequent(x) -> Asthenic(x)) <- forall x (Cannibalic(x) -> Consequent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Julianna is not champion. Julianna is aplitic. Becki is preventive. Becki is aplitic. Becki is brinded. Becki is decorated. Wandis is prognathic. Wandis is champion. Wandis is brinded. Wandis is decorated. Dasya is preventive. Dasya is aplitic. Furry things are preventive. If something is preventive then it is unassured. All preventive, prognathic things are unassured. If something is aplitic and not champion then it is decorated. Furry, unassured things are aplitic. All decorated things are brinded. If something is champion and not decorated then it is brinded. All unassured things are brinded. Julianna is not preventive.", "logic": "\nnot Champion(julianna)\nAplitic(julianna)\nPreventive(becki)\nAplitic(becki)\nBrinded(becki)\nDecorated(becki)\nPrognathic(wandis)\nChampion(wandis)\nBrinded(wandis)\nDecorated(wandis)\nPreventive(dasya)\nAplitic(dasya)\nforall x (Prognathic(x) -> Preventive(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> Unassured(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Unassured(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) and not Champion(x) -> Decorated(x))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) and Unassured(x) -> Aplitic(x))\nforall x (Decorated(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Champion(x) and not Decorated(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Brinded(x))\n\nnot Preventive(julianna)\n\nforall x (Prognathic(x) -> Preventive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Zeb is not briary. Zeb is adhesive. Violante is epenthetic. Violante is adhesive. Violante is inebriated. Violante is rumansh. Lissi is aleatory. Lissi is briary. Lissi is inebriated. Lissi is rumansh. Jemmie is epenthetic. Jemmie is adhesive. Furry things are epenthetic. If something is epenthetic then it is delusive. All epenthetic, aleatory things are delusive. If something is adhesive and not briary then it is rumansh. Furry, delusive things are adhesive. All rumansh things are inebriated. If something is briary and not rumansh then it is inebriated. All delusive things are inebriated. Violante is aleatory.", "logic": "\nnot Briary(zeb)\nAdhesive(zeb)\nEpenthetic(violante)\nAdhesive(violante)\nInebriated(violante)\nRumansh(violante)\nAleatory(lissi)\nBriary(lissi)\nInebriated(lissi)\nRumansh(lissi)\nEpenthetic(jemmie)\nAdhesive(jemmie)\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Epenthetic(x) -> Delusive(x))\nforall x (Epenthetic(x) and Aleatory(x) -> Delusive(x))\nforall x (Adhesive(x) and not Briary(x) -> Rumansh(x))\nforall x (Aleatory(x) and Delusive(x) -> Adhesive(x))\nforall x (Rumansh(x) -> Inebriated(x))\nforall x (Briary(x) and not Rumansh(x) -> Inebriated(x))\nforall x (Delusive(x) -> Inebriated(x))\n\nAleatory(violante)\n\nAleatory(violante) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Edsel is not twinning. Edsel is centrist. Poppy is gilded. Poppy is centrist. Poppy is assiduous. Poppy is stoppered. Allegra is unsymbolic. Allegra is twinning. Allegra is assiduous. Allegra is stoppered. Milicent is gilded. Milicent is centrist. Furry things are gilded. If something is gilded then it is powerful. All gilded, unsymbolic things are powerful. If something is centrist and not twinning then it is stoppered. Furry, powerful things are centrist. All stoppered things are assiduous. If something is twinning and not stoppered then it is assiduous. All powerful things are assiduous. Milicent is not unsymbolic.", "logic": "\nnot Twinning(edsel)\nCentrist(edsel)\nGilded(poppy)\nCentrist(poppy)\nAssiduous(poppy)\nStoppered(poppy)\nUnsymbolic(allegra)\nTwinning(allegra)\nAssiduous(allegra)\nStoppered(allegra)\nGilded(milicent)\nCentrist(milicent)\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Gilded(x))\nforall x (Gilded(x) -> Powerful(x))\nforall x (Gilded(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Powerful(x))\nforall x (Centrist(x) and not Twinning(x) -> Stoppered(x))\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) and Powerful(x) -> Centrist(x))\nforall x (Stoppered(x) -> Assiduous(x))\nforall x (Twinning(x) and not Stoppered(x) -> Assiduous(x))\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> Assiduous(x))\n\nnot Unsymbolic(milicent)\n\nnot Unsymbolic(milicent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Dino is not nosocomial. Dino is flavorous. Dallas is admissive. Dallas is flavorous. Dallas is chilean. Dallas is untanned. Reina is glorified. Reina is nosocomial. Reina is chilean. Reina is untanned. Devinne is admissive. Devinne is flavorous. Furry things are admissive. If something is admissive then it is emollient. All admissive, glorified things are emollient. If something is flavorous and not nosocomial then it is untanned. Furry, emollient things are flavorous. All untanned things are chilean. If something is nosocomial and not untanned then it is chilean. All emollient things are chilean. Devinne is nosocomial.", "logic": "\nnot Nosocomial(dino)\nFlavorous(dino)\nAdmissive(dallas)\nFlavorous(dallas)\nChilean(dallas)\nUntanned(dallas)\nGlorified(reina)\nNosocomial(reina)\nChilean(reina)\nUntanned(reina)\nAdmissive(devinne)\nFlavorous(devinne)\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Emollient(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) and Glorified(x) -> Emollient(x))\nforall x (Flavorous(x) and not Nosocomial(x) -> Untanned(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) and Emollient(x) -> Flavorous(x))\nforall x (Untanned(x) -> Chilean(x))\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and not Untanned(x) -> Chilean(x))\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> Chilean(x))\n\nNosocomial(devinne)\n\nNosocomial(devinne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Fancie is not absorptive. Fancie is shingly. Tessi is advanced. Tessi is shingly. Tessi is amenable. Tessi is devouring. Ray is utilised. Ray is absorptive. Ray is amenable. Ray is devouring. Zonnya is advanced. Zonnya is shingly. Furry things are advanced. If something is advanced then it is falcate. All advanced, utilised things are falcate. If something is shingly and not absorptive then it is devouring. Furry, falcate things are shingly. All devouring things are amenable. If something is absorptive and not devouring then it is amenable. All falcate things are amenable. Fancie is not utilised.", "logic": "\nnot Absorptive(fancie)\nShingly(fancie)\nAdvanced(tessi)\nShingly(tessi)\nAmenable(tessi)\nDevouring(tessi)\nUtilised(ray)\nAbsorptive(ray)\nAmenable(ray)\nDevouring(ray)\nAdvanced(zonnya)\nShingly(zonnya)\nforall x (Utilised(x) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Falcate(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) and Utilised(x) -> Falcate(x))\nforall x (Shingly(x) and not Absorptive(x) -> Devouring(x))\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Falcate(x) -> Shingly(x))\nforall x (Devouring(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) and not Devouring(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Amenable(x))\n\nnot Utilised(fancie)\n\nnot Utilised(fancie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Roxanna is not confusable. Roxanna is nonpolar. Page is extradural. Page is nonpolar. Page is graded. Page is plumed. Sidney is bodiless. Sidney is confusable. Sidney is graded. Sidney is plumed. Barry is extradural. Barry is nonpolar. Furry things are extradural. If something is extradural then it is undrained. All extradural, bodiless things are undrained. If something is nonpolar and not confusable then it is plumed. Furry, undrained things are nonpolar. All plumed things are graded. If something is confusable and not plumed then it is graded. All undrained things are graded. Page is confusable.", "logic": "\nnot Confusable(roxanna)\nNonpolar(roxanna)\nExtradural(page)\nNonpolar(page)\nGraded(page)\nPlumed(page)\nBodiless(sidney)\nConfusable(sidney)\nGraded(sidney)\nPlumed(sidney)\nExtradural(barry)\nNonpolar(barry)\nforall x (Bodiless(x) -> Extradural(x))\nforall x (Extradural(x) -> Undrained(x))\nforall x (Extradural(x) and Bodiless(x) -> Undrained(x))\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) and not Confusable(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Bodiless(x) and Undrained(x) -> Nonpolar(x))\nforall x (Plumed(x) -> Graded(x))\nforall x (Confusable(x) and not Plumed(x) -> Graded(x))\nforall x (Undrained(x) -> Graded(x))\n\nConfusable(page)\n\nConfusable(page) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "The murial is mundane. If the murial is aseptic and the murial is unsnarled then the murial is palatial. If the murial is mundane then the murial is aseptic. Big people are palatial. All cuspidated, aseptic people are mundane. All palatial people are mundane. Red, mundane people are cuspidated. The murial is mundane.", "logic": "\nMundane(murial)\nAseptic(murial) and Unsnarled(murial) -> Palatial(murial)\nMundane(murial) -> Aseptic(murial)\nforall x (Cuspidated(x) -> Palatial(x))\nforall x (Cuspidated(x) and Aseptic(x) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Palatial(x) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Aseptic(x) and Mundane(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\n\nMundane(murial)\n\ntherefore Mundane(murial)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The diamond is vented. If the diamond is bryophytic and the diamond is whatsoever then the diamond is resonant. If the diamond is vented then the diamond is bryophytic. Big people are resonant. All undreamt, bryophytic people are vented. All resonant people are vented. Red, vented people are undreamt. The diamond is not vented.", "logic": "\nVented(diamond)\nBryophytic(diamond) and Whatsoever(diamond) -> Resonant(diamond)\nVented(diamond) -> Bryophytic(diamond)\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Resonant(x))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) and Bryophytic(x) -> Vented(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Vented(x))\nforall x (Bryophytic(x) and Vented(x) -> Undreamt(x))\n\nnot Vented(diamond)\n\ntherefore Vented(diamond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The nadeen is schmalzy. If the nadeen is agrologic and the nadeen is somali then the nadeen is unheated. If the nadeen is schmalzy then the nadeen is agrologic. Big people are unheated. All isentropic, agrologic people are schmalzy. All unheated people are schmalzy. Red, schmalzy people are isentropic. The nadeen is agrologic.", "logic": "\nSchmalzy(nadeen)\nAgrologic(nadeen) and Somali(nadeen) -> Unheated(nadeen)\nSchmalzy(nadeen) -> Agrologic(nadeen)\nforall x (Isentropic(x) -> Unheated(x))\nforall x (Isentropic(x) and Agrologic(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\nforall x (Unheated(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\nforall x (Agrologic(x) and Schmalzy(x) -> Isentropic(x))\n\nAgrologic(nadeen)\n\nSchmalzy(nadeen) and Schmalzy(nadeen) -> Agrologic(nadeen) -> therefore Agrologic(nadeen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The katerina is naturistic. If the katerina is nonresiny and the katerina is tonsured then the katerina is micropylar. If the katerina is naturistic then the katerina is nonresiny. Big people are micropylar. All charnel, nonresiny people are naturistic. All micropylar people are naturistic. Red, naturistic people are charnel. The katerina is not nonresiny.", "logic": "\nNaturistic(katerina)\nNonresiny(katerina) and Tonsured(katerina) -> Micropylar(katerina)\nNaturistic(katerina) -> Nonresiny(katerina)\nforall x (Charnel(x) -> Micropylar(x))\nforall x (Charnel(x) and Nonresiny(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Micropylar(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Naturistic(x) -> Charnel(x))\n\nnot Nonresiny(katerina)\n\nNaturistic(katerina) and Naturistic(katerina) -> Nonresiny(katerina) -> therefore Nonresiny(katerina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The claudina is aglow. If the claudina is mown and the claudina is sottish then the claudina is sigmoidal. If the claudina is aglow then the claudina is mown. Big people are sigmoidal. All softheaded, mown people are aglow. All sigmoidal people are aglow. Red, aglow people are softheaded. The claudina is softheaded.", "logic": "\nAglow(claudina)\nMown(claudina) and Sottish(claudina) -> Sigmoidal(claudina)\nAglow(claudina) -> Mown(claudina)\nforall x (Softheaded(x) -> Sigmoidal(x))\nforall x (Softheaded(x) and Mown(x) -> Aglow(x))\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) -> Aglow(x))\nforall x (Mown(x) and Aglow(x) -> Softheaded(x))\n\nSoftheaded(claudina)\n\nAglow(claudina) and Aglow(claudina) -> Mown(claudina) -> therefore Mown(claudina) Mown(claudina) and Aglow(claudina) and forall x (Mown(x) and Aglow(x) -> Softheaded(x)) -> therefore Softheaded(claudina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The ambrose is titulary. If the ambrose is buttony and the ambrose is unheeded then the ambrose is foremost. If the ambrose is titulary then the ambrose is buttony. Big people are foremost. All meddling, buttony people are titulary. All foremost people are titulary. Red, titulary people are meddling. The ambrose is not meddling.", "logic": "\nTitulary(ambrose)\nButtony(ambrose) and Unheeded(ambrose) -> Foremost(ambrose)\nTitulary(ambrose) -> Buttony(ambrose)\nforall x (Meddling(x) -> Foremost(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and Buttony(x) -> Titulary(x))\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Titulary(x))\nforall x (Buttony(x) and Titulary(x) -> Meddling(x))\n\nnot Meddling(ambrose)\n\nTitulary(ambrose) and Titulary(ambrose) -> Buttony(ambrose) -> therefore Buttony(ambrose) Buttony(ambrose) and Titulary(ambrose) and forall x (Buttony(x) and Titulary(x) -> Meddling(x)) -> therefore Meddling(ambrose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The shelley is covered. If the shelley is laboured and the shelley is residual then the shelley is nonfatal. If the shelley is covered then the shelley is laboured. Big people are nonfatal. All nutritive, laboured people are covered. All nonfatal people are covered. Red, covered people are nutritive. The shelley is nonfatal.", "logic": "\nCovered(shelley)\nLaboured(shelley) and Residual(shelley) -> Nonfatal(shelley)\nCovered(shelley) -> Laboured(shelley)\nforall x (Nutritive(x) -> Nonfatal(x))\nforall x (Nutritive(x) and Laboured(x) -> Covered(x))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) -> Covered(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) and Covered(x) -> Nutritive(x))\n\nNonfatal(shelley)\n\nCovered(shelley) and Covered(shelley) -> Laboured(shelley) -> therefore Laboured(shelley) Laboured(shelley) and Covered(shelley) and forall x (Laboured(x) and Covered(x) -> Nutritive(x)) -> therefore Nutritive(shelley) Nutritive(shelley) and forall x (Nutritive(x) -> Nonfatal(x)) -> therefore Nonfatal(shelley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The jaime is outdoorsy. If the jaime is unanalyzed and the jaime is semiweekly then the jaime is huge. If the jaime is outdoorsy then the jaime is unanalyzed. Big people are huge. All hypnotised, unanalyzed people are outdoorsy. All huge people are outdoorsy. Red, outdoorsy people are hypnotised. The jaime is not huge.", "logic": "\nOutdoorsy(jaime)\nUnanalyzed(jaime) and Semiweekly(jaime) -> Huge(jaime)\nOutdoorsy(jaime) -> Unanalyzed(jaime)\nforall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Huge(x))\nforall x (Hypnotised(x) and Unanalyzed(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Huge(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Unanalyzed(x) and Outdoorsy(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\n\nnot Huge(jaime)\n\nOutdoorsy(jaime) and Outdoorsy(jaime) -> Unanalyzed(jaime) -> therefore Unanalyzed(jaime) Unanalyzed(jaime) and Outdoorsy(jaime) and forall x (Unanalyzed(x) and Outdoorsy(x) -> Hypnotised(x)) -> therefore Hypnotised(jaime) Hypnotised(jaime) and forall x (Hypnotised(x) -> Huge(x)) -> therefore Huge(jaime)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The selle is upscale. If the selle is harsh and the selle is spicy then the selle is straw. If the selle is upscale then the selle is harsh. Big people are straw. All german, harsh people are upscale. All straw people are upscale. Red, upscale people are german. The selle does not eat the selle.", "logic": "\nUpscale(selle)\nHarsh(selle) and Spicy(selle) -> Straw(selle)\nUpscale(selle) -> Harsh(selle)\nforall x (German(x) -> Straw(x))\nforall x (German(x) and Harsh(x) -> Upscale(x))\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Upscale(x))\nforall x (Harsh(x) and Upscale(x) -> German(x))\n\nnot Eats(selle, selle)\n\nnot Eats(selle, selle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The consuelo is four. If the consuelo is grand and the consuelo is ladylike then the consuelo is rife. If the consuelo is four then the consuelo is grand. Big people are rife. All attractive, grand people are four. All rife people are four. Red, four people are attractive. The consuelo visits the consuelo.", "logic": "\nFour(consuelo)\nGrand(consuelo) and Ladylike(consuelo) -> Rife(consuelo)\nFour(consuelo) -> Grand(consuelo)\nforall x (Attractive(x) -> Rife(x))\nforall x (Attractive(x) and Grand(x) -> Four(x))\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Four(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) and Four(x) -> Attractive(x))\n\nVisits(consuelo, consuelo)\n\nVisits(consuelo, consuelo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The berkie is uncaused. If the berkie is dogging and the berkie is woeful then the berkie is modulated. If the berkie is uncaused then the berkie is dogging. Big people are modulated. All unshoed, dogging people are uncaused. All modulated people are uncaused. Red, uncaused people are unshoed. The berkie does not like the berkie.", "logic": "\nUncaused(berkie)\nDogging(berkie) and Woeful(berkie) -> Modulated(berkie)\nUncaused(berkie) -> Dogging(berkie)\nforall x (Unshoed(x) -> Modulated(x))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) and Dogging(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nforall x (Modulated(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nforall x (Dogging(x) and Uncaused(x) -> Unshoed(x))\n\nnot Likes(berkie, berkie)\n\nnot Likes(berkie, berkie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The onlea is venose. If the onlea is gaumless and the onlea is plaguey then the onlea is wearable. If the onlea is venose then the onlea is gaumless. Big people are wearable. All tyrolese, gaumless people are venose. All wearable people are venose. Red, venose people are tyrolese. The onlea is plaguey.", "logic": "\nVenose(onlea)\nGaumless(onlea) and Plaguey(onlea) -> Wearable(onlea)\nVenose(onlea) -> Gaumless(onlea)\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Wearable(x))\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) and Gaumless(x) -> Venose(x))\nforall x (Wearable(x) -> Venose(x))\nforall x (Gaumless(x) and Venose(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\n\nPlaguey(onlea)\n\nPlaguey(onlea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "Anselma is prudent. Johnna is not cutting. Faith is monosemous. All unprovable people are not small. If someone is small and not cutting then they are cuneiform. Red people are cuneiform. If Anselma is monosemous then Anselma is downscale. If someone is unprovable and not small then they are prudent. Nice, prudent people are downscale. Nice, cuneiform people are monosemous. Cold people are monosemous. Johnna is not cutting.", "logic": "\nPrudent(anselma)\nnot Cutting(johnna)\nMonosemous(faith)\nforall x (Unprovable(x) -> not Small(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and not Cutting(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Prudent(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nMonosemous(anselma) -> Downscale(anselma)\nforall x (Unprovable(x) and not Small(x) -> Prudent(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Prudent(x) -> Downscale(x))\nforall x (Small(x) and Cuneiform(x) -> Monosemous(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) -> Monosemous(x))\n\nnot Cutting(johnna)\n\ntherefore not Cutting(johnna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Agata is unwritten. Whit is not faded. Donovan is cheery. All hesperian people are not herculean. If someone is herculean and not faded then they are sideways. Red people are sideways. If Agata is cheery then Agata is didactical. If someone is hesperian and not herculean then they are unwritten. Nice, unwritten people are didactical. Nice, sideways people are cheery. Cold people are cheery. Agata is not unwritten.", "logic": "\nUnwritten(agata)\nnot Faded(whit)\nCheery(donovan)\nforall x (Hesperian(x) -> not Herculean(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) and not Faded(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Unwritten(x) -> Sideways(x))\nCheery(agata) -> Didactical(agata)\nforall x (Hesperian(x) and not Herculean(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) and Unwritten(x) -> Didactical(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) and Sideways(x) -> Cheery(x))\nforall x (Sideways(x) -> Cheery(x))\n\nnot Unwritten(agata)\n\ntherefore Unwritten(agata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Feodora is stemmed. Ingunna is not roving. Charmaine is sole. All anecdotal people are not effusive. If someone is effusive and not roving then they are pedal. Red people are pedal. If Feodora is sole then Feodora is sacculated. If someone is anecdotal and not effusive then they are stemmed. Nice, stemmed people are sacculated. Nice, pedal people are sole. Cold people are sole. Feodora is pedal.", "logic": "\nStemmed(feodora)\nnot Roving(ingunna)\nSole(charmaine)\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) -> not Effusive(x))\nforall x (Effusive(x) and not Roving(x) -> Pedal(x))\nforall x (Stemmed(x) -> Pedal(x))\nSole(feodora) -> Sacculated(feodora)\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) and not Effusive(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Effusive(x) and Stemmed(x) -> Sacculated(x))\nforall x (Effusive(x) and Pedal(x) -> Sole(x))\nforall x (Pedal(x) -> Sole(x))\n\nPedal(feodora)\n\nStemmed(feodora) and forall x (Stemmed(x) -> Pedal(x)) -> therefore Pedal(feodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Eyde is incoherent. Vin is not diminutive. Niccolo is inflatable. All unobserved people are not shelvy. If someone is shelvy and not diminutive then they are unwebbed. Red people are unwebbed. If Eyde is inflatable then Eyde is redeemed. If someone is unobserved and not shelvy then they are incoherent. Nice, incoherent people are redeemed. Nice, unwebbed people are inflatable. Cold people are inflatable. Eyde is not unwebbed.", "logic": "\nIncoherent(eyde)\nnot Diminutive(vin)\nInflatable(niccolo)\nforall x (Unobserved(x) -> not Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Shelvy(x) and not Diminutive(x) -> Unwebbed(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) -> Unwebbed(x))\nInflatable(eyde) -> Redeemed(eyde)\nforall x (Unobserved(x) and not Shelvy(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Shelvy(x) and Incoherent(x) -> Redeemed(x))\nforall x (Shelvy(x) and Unwebbed(x) -> Inflatable(x))\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) -> Inflatable(x))\n\nnot Unwebbed(eyde)\n\nIncoherent(eyde) and forall x (Incoherent(x) -> Unwebbed(x)) -> therefore Unwebbed(eyde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Fae is vegetative. Danya is not garish. Leif is zygotic. All intense people are not malodorous. If someone is malodorous and not garish then they are genetical. Red people are genetical. If Fae is zygotic then Fae is oracular. If someone is intense and not malodorous then they are vegetative. Nice, vegetative people are oracular. Nice, genetical people are zygotic. Cold people are zygotic. Fae is zygotic.", "logic": "\nVegetative(fae)\nnot Garish(danya)\nZygotic(leif)\nforall x (Intense(x) -> not Malodorous(x))\nforall x (Malodorous(x) and not Garish(x) -> Genetical(x))\nforall x (Vegetative(x) -> Genetical(x))\nZygotic(fae) -> Oracular(fae)\nforall x (Intense(x) and not Malodorous(x) -> Vegetative(x))\nforall x (Malodorous(x) and Vegetative(x) -> Oracular(x))\nforall x (Malodorous(x) and Genetical(x) -> Zygotic(x))\nforall x (Genetical(x) -> Zygotic(x))\n\nZygotic(fae)\n\nVegetative(fae) and forall x (Vegetative(x) -> Genetical(x)) -> therefore Genetical(fae) Genetical(fae) and forall x (Genetical(x) -> Zygotic(x)) -> therefore Zygotic(fae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Ginni is vicarious. Ellissa is not benzenoid. Nettle is afraid. All functional people are not habitual. If someone is habitual and not benzenoid then they are unoiled. Red people are unoiled. If Ginni is afraid then Ginni is engraved. If someone is functional and not habitual then they are vicarious. Nice, vicarious people are engraved. Nice, unoiled people are afraid. Cold people are afraid. Ginni is not afraid.", "logic": "\nVicarious(ginni)\nnot Benzenoid(ellissa)\nAfraid(nettle)\nforall x (Functional(x) -> not Habitual(x))\nforall x (Habitual(x) and not Benzenoid(x) -> Unoiled(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) -> Unoiled(x))\nAfraid(ginni) -> Engraved(ginni)\nforall x (Functional(x) and not Habitual(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Habitual(x) and Vicarious(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Habitual(x) and Unoiled(x) -> Afraid(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> Afraid(x))\n\nnot Afraid(ginni)\n\nVicarious(ginni) and forall x (Vicarious(x) -> Unoiled(x)) -> therefore Unoiled(ginni) Unoiled(ginni) and forall x (Unoiled(x) -> Afraid(x)) -> therefore Afraid(ginni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Ronnie is trifid. Siward is not soporific. Corabel is chuffed. All omnivorous people are not slouchy. If someone is slouchy and not soporific then they are impeccant. Red people are impeccant. If Ronnie is chuffed then Ronnie is overt. If someone is omnivorous and not slouchy then they are trifid. Nice, trifid people are overt. Nice, impeccant people are chuffed. Cold people are chuffed. Ronnie is overt.", "logic": "\nTrifid(ronnie)\nnot Soporific(siward)\nChuffed(corabel)\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) -> not Slouchy(x))\nforall x (Slouchy(x) and not Soporific(x) -> Impeccant(x))\nforall x (Trifid(x) -> Impeccant(x))\nChuffed(ronnie) -> Overt(ronnie)\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) and not Slouchy(x) -> Trifid(x))\nforall x (Slouchy(x) and Trifid(x) -> Overt(x))\nforall x (Slouchy(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Impeccant(x) -> Chuffed(x))\n\nOvert(ronnie)\n\nTrifid(ronnie) and forall x (Trifid(x) -> Impeccant(x)) -> therefore Impeccant(ronnie) Impeccant(ronnie) and forall x (Impeccant(x) -> Chuffed(x)) -> therefore Chuffed(ronnie) Chuffed(ronnie) and Chuffed(ronnie) -> Overt(ronnie) -> therefore Overt(ronnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Marv is phonologic. Raphael is not beguiled. Cherilyn is halfway. All powdered people are not dermal. If someone is dermal and not beguiled then they are classy. Red people are classy. If Marv is halfway then Marv is finnish. If someone is powdered and not dermal then they are phonologic. Nice, phonologic people are finnish. Nice, classy people are halfway. Cold people are halfway. Marv is not finnish.", "logic": "\nPhonologic(marv)\nnot Beguiled(raphael)\nHalfway(cherilyn)\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> not Dermal(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and not Beguiled(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Phonologic(x) -> Classy(x))\nHalfway(marv) -> Finnish(marv)\nforall x (Powdered(x) and not Dermal(x) -> Phonologic(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Phonologic(x) -> Finnish(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Classy(x) -> Halfway(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) -> Halfway(x))\n\nnot Finnish(marv)\n\nPhonologic(marv) and forall x (Phonologic(x) -> Classy(x)) -> therefore Classy(marv) Classy(marv) and forall x (Classy(x) -> Halfway(x)) -> therefore Halfway(marv) Halfway(marv) and Halfway(marv) -> Finnish(marv) -> therefore Finnish(marv)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Damon is ulnar. Thedrick is not unredeemed. Melodee is assonant. All frostian people are not blest. If someone is blest and not unredeemed then they are glary. Red people are glary. If Damon is assonant then Damon is mongol. If someone is frostian and not blest then they are ulnar. Nice, ulnar people are mongol. Nice, glary people are assonant. Cold people are assonant. Melodee is not mongol.", "logic": "\nUlnar(damon)\nnot Unredeemed(thedrick)\nAssonant(melodee)\nforall x (Frostian(x) -> not Blest(x))\nforall x (Blest(x) and not Unredeemed(x) -> Glary(x))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Glary(x))\nAssonant(damon) -> Mongol(damon)\nforall x (Frostian(x) and not Blest(x) -> Ulnar(x))\nforall x (Blest(x) and Ulnar(x) -> Mongol(x))\nforall x (Blest(x) and Glary(x) -> Assonant(x))\nforall x (Glary(x) -> Assonant(x))\n\nnot Mongol(melodee)\n\nforall x (Blest(x) and Ulnar(x) -> Mongol(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Chen is current. Carolin is not arcuate. Magna is mousy. All delphian people are not overland. If someone is overland and not arcuate then they are crenated. Red people are crenated. If Chen is mousy then Chen is deliberate. If someone is delphian and not overland then they are current. Nice, current people are deliberate. Nice, crenated people are mousy. Cold people are mousy. Carolin is current.", "logic": "\nCurrent(chen)\nnot Arcuate(carolin)\nMousy(magna)\nforall x (Delphian(x) -> not Overland(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and not Arcuate(x) -> Crenated(x))\nforall x (Current(x) -> Crenated(x))\nMousy(chen) -> Deliberate(chen)\nforall x (Delphian(x) and not Overland(x) -> Current(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and Current(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and Crenated(x) -> Mousy(x))\nforall x (Crenated(x) -> Mousy(x))\n\nCurrent(carolin)\n\nforall x (Delphian(x) and not Overland(x) -> Current(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Pyotr is staminate. Teena is not unassisted. Jordanna is ovine. All meridian people are not bastard. If someone is bastard and not unassisted then they are andorran. Red people are andorran. If Pyotr is ovine then Pyotr is frail. If someone is meridian and not bastard then they are staminate. Nice, staminate people are frail. Nice, andorran people are ovine. Cold people are ovine. Teena is not ovine.", "logic": "\nStaminate(pyotr)\nnot Unassisted(teena)\nOvine(jordanna)\nforall x (Meridian(x) -> not Bastard(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) and not Unassisted(x) -> Andorran(x))\nforall x (Staminate(x) -> Andorran(x))\nOvine(pyotr) -> Frail(pyotr)\nforall x (Meridian(x) and not Bastard(x) -> Staminate(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) and Staminate(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) and Andorran(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Andorran(x) -> Ovine(x))\n\nnot Ovine(teena)\n\nforall x (Andorran(x) -> Ovine(x)) <- forall x (Staminate(x) -> Andorran(x)) <- forall x (Meridian(x) and not Bastard(x) -> Staminate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Shane is mossy. Leticia is not microbic. Klarika is vulpine. All steep people are not roguish. If someone is roguish and not microbic then they are forfeit. Red people are forfeit. If Shane is vulpine then Shane is inodorous. If someone is steep and not roguish then they are mossy. Nice, mossy people are inodorous. Nice, forfeit people are vulpine. Cold people are vulpine. Leticia is inodorous.", "logic": "\nMossy(shane)\nnot Microbic(leticia)\nVulpine(klarika)\nforall x (Steep(x) -> not Roguish(x))\nforall x (Roguish(x) and not Microbic(x) -> Forfeit(x))\nforall x (Mossy(x) -> Forfeit(x))\nVulpine(shane) -> Inodorous(shane)\nforall x (Steep(x) and not Roguish(x) -> Mossy(x))\nforall x (Roguish(x) and Mossy(x) -> Inodorous(x))\nforall x (Roguish(x) and Forfeit(x) -> Vulpine(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) -> Vulpine(x))\n\nInodorous(leticia)\n\nforall x (Roguish(x) and Mossy(x) -> Inodorous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Lorianne is tearful. Lura is not korean. Orin is acceptable. All untucked people are not neckless. If someone is neckless and not korean then they are oligarchic. Red people are oligarchic. If Lorianne is acceptable then Lorianne is latinate. If someone is untucked and not neckless then they are tearful. Nice, tearful people are latinate. Nice, oligarchic people are acceptable. Cold people are acceptable. Orin is not untucked.", "logic": "\nTearful(lorianne)\nnot Korean(lura)\nAcceptable(orin)\nforall x (Untucked(x) -> not Neckless(x))\nforall x (Neckless(x) and not Korean(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\nAcceptable(lorianne) -> Latinate(lorianne)\nforall x (Untucked(x) and not Neckless(x) -> Tearful(x))\nforall x (Neckless(x) and Tearful(x) -> Latinate(x))\nforall x (Neckless(x) and Oligarchic(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Acceptable(x))\n\nnot Untucked(orin)\n\nnot Untucked(orin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Keeley is seismal. Loralee is not rallying. Marlene is kaput. All infantile people are not unstirred. If someone is unstirred and not rallying then they are hebdomadal. Red people are hebdomadal. If Keeley is kaput then Keeley is thickened. If someone is infantile and not unstirred then they are seismal. Nice, seismal people are thickened. Nice, hebdomadal people are kaput. Cold people are kaput. Keeley is rallying.", "logic": "\nSeismal(keeley)\nnot Rallying(loralee)\nKaput(marlene)\nforall x (Infantile(x) -> not Unstirred(x))\nforall x (Unstirred(x) and not Rallying(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Seismal(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nKaput(keeley) -> Thickened(keeley)\nforall x (Infantile(x) and not Unstirred(x) -> Seismal(x))\nforall x (Unstirred(x) and Seismal(x) -> Thickened(x))\nforall x (Unstirred(x) and Hebdomadal(x) -> Kaput(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Kaput(x))\n\nRallying(keeley)\n\nRallying(keeley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Marcelia is agnostical. Layla is not oriented. Tynan is hedonic. All dying people are not ended. If someone is ended and not oriented then they are xcii. Red people are xcii. If Marcelia is hedonic then Marcelia is edematous. If someone is dying and not ended then they are agnostical. Nice, agnostical people are edematous. Nice, xcii people are hedonic. Cold people are hedonic. Marcelia is not dying.", "logic": "\nAgnostical(marcelia)\nnot Oriented(layla)\nHedonic(tynan)\nforall x (Dying(x) -> not Ended(x))\nforall x (Ended(x) and not Oriented(x) -> Xcii(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Xcii(x))\nHedonic(marcelia) -> Edematous(marcelia)\nforall x (Dying(x) and not Ended(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Ended(x) and Agnostical(x) -> Edematous(x))\nforall x (Ended(x) and Xcii(x) -> Hedonic(x))\nforall x (Xcii(x) -> Hedonic(x))\n\nnot Dying(marcelia)\n\nnot Dying(marcelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Levin is huffy. Arlina is not prayerful. Kori is statuary. All copesetic people are not cultivated. If someone is cultivated and not prayerful then they are unequalled. Red people are unequalled. If Levin is statuary then Levin is amnic. If someone is copesetic and not cultivated then they are huffy. Nice, huffy people are amnic. Nice, unequalled people are statuary. Cold people are statuary. Kori is cultivated.", "logic": "\nHuffy(levin)\nnot Prayerful(arlina)\nStatuary(kori)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> not Cultivated(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and not Prayerful(x) -> Unequalled(x))\nforall x (Huffy(x) -> Unequalled(x))\nStatuary(levin) -> Amnic(levin)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and not Cultivated(x) -> Huffy(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and Huffy(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and Unequalled(x) -> Statuary(x))\nforall x (Unequalled(x) -> Statuary(x))\n\nCultivated(kori)\n\nCultivated(kori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Marlow is unlaced. Merridie is paraguayan. Merridie is analgesic. If Marlow is chary then Marlow is nativistic. If something is unlaced then it is chary. If Marlow is nativistic then Marlow is perceptive. If something is analgesic and not paraguayan then it is nativistic. If something is perceptive and not chary then it is not analgesic. If something is paraguayan and chary then it is analgesic. All nativistic, heedful things are analgesic. Green, chary things are not analgesic. Marlow is unlaced.", "logic": "\nUnlaced(marlow)\nParaguayan(merridie)\nAnalgesic(merridie)\nChary(marlow) -> Nativistic(marlow)\nforall x (Unlaced(x) -> Chary(x))\nNativistic(marlow) -> Perceptive(marlow)\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and not Paraguayan(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nforall x (Perceptive(x) and not Chary(x) -> not Analgesic(x))\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) and Chary(x) -> Analgesic(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Heedful(x) -> Analgesic(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Chary(x) -> not Analgesic(x))\n\nUnlaced(marlow)\n\ntherefore Unlaced(marlow)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Luciana is booming. Shir is edifying. Shir is frowsy. If Luciana is knotty then Luciana is moravian. If something is booming then it is knotty. If Luciana is moravian then Luciana is puff. If something is frowsy and not edifying then it is moravian. If something is puff and not knotty then it is not frowsy. If something is edifying and knotty then it is frowsy. All moravian, teeny things are frowsy. Green, knotty things are not frowsy. Luciana is not booming.", "logic": "\nBooming(luciana)\nEdifying(shir)\nFrowsy(shir)\nKnotty(luciana) -> Moravian(luciana)\nforall x (Booming(x) -> Knotty(x))\nMoravian(luciana) -> Puff(luciana)\nforall x (Frowsy(x) and not Edifying(x) -> Moravian(x))\nforall x (Puff(x) and not Knotty(x) -> not Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) and Knotty(x) -> Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) and Teeny(x) -> Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) and Knotty(x) -> not Frowsy(x))\n\nnot Booming(luciana)\n\ntherefore Booming(luciana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Amery is oncologic. Darcee is acetonic. Darcee is ruttish. If Amery is corrupted then Amery is wiggly. If something is oncologic then it is corrupted. If Amery is wiggly then Amery is inaccurate. If something is ruttish and not acetonic then it is wiggly. If something is inaccurate and not corrupted then it is not ruttish. If something is acetonic and corrupted then it is ruttish. All wiggly, chancy things are ruttish. Green, corrupted things are not ruttish. Amery is corrupted.", "logic": "\nOncologic(amery)\nAcetonic(darcee)\nRuttish(darcee)\nCorrupted(amery) -> Wiggly(amery)\nforall x (Oncologic(x) -> Corrupted(x))\nWiggly(amery) -> Inaccurate(amery)\nforall x (Ruttish(x) and not Acetonic(x) -> Wiggly(x))\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) and not Corrupted(x) -> not Ruttish(x))\nforall x (Acetonic(x) and Corrupted(x) -> Ruttish(x))\nforall x (Wiggly(x) and Chancy(x) -> Ruttish(x))\nforall x (Wiggly(x) and Corrupted(x) -> not Ruttish(x))\n\nCorrupted(amery)\n\nOncologic(amery) and forall x (Oncologic(x) -> Corrupted(x)) -> therefore Corrupted(amery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Estella is unobserved. Keelia is sinning. Keelia is fluent. If Estella is supported then Estella is northmost. If something is unobserved then it is supported. If Estella is northmost then Estella is bombastic. If something is fluent and not sinning then it is northmost. If something is bombastic and not supported then it is not fluent. If something is sinning and supported then it is fluent. All northmost, terminated things are fluent. Green, supported things are not fluent. Estella is not supported.", "logic": "\nUnobserved(estella)\nSinning(keelia)\nFluent(keelia)\nSupported(estella) -> Northmost(estella)\nforall x (Unobserved(x) -> Supported(x))\nNorthmost(estella) -> Bombastic(estella)\nforall x (Fluent(x) and not Sinning(x) -> Northmost(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) and not Supported(x) -> not Fluent(x))\nforall x (Sinning(x) and Supported(x) -> Fluent(x))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and Terminated(x) -> Fluent(x))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and Supported(x) -> not Fluent(x))\n\nnot Supported(estella)\n\nUnobserved(estella) and forall x (Unobserved(x) -> Supported(x)) -> therefore Supported(estella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Dena is morphemic. Melba is sozzled. Melba is indisposed. If Dena is cyclonical then Dena is footsure. If something is morphemic then it is cyclonical. If Dena is footsure then Dena is stirring. If something is indisposed and not sozzled then it is footsure. If something is stirring and not cyclonical then it is not indisposed. If something is sozzled and cyclonical then it is indisposed. All footsure, xenophobic things are indisposed. Green, cyclonical things are not indisposed. Dena is footsure.", "logic": "\nMorphemic(dena)\nSozzled(melba)\nIndisposed(melba)\nCyclonical(dena) -> Footsure(dena)\nforall x (Morphemic(x) -> Cyclonical(x))\nFootsure(dena) -> Stirring(dena)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and not Sozzled(x) -> Footsure(x))\nforall x (Stirring(x) and not Cyclonical(x) -> not Indisposed(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) and Cyclonical(x) -> Indisposed(x))\nforall x (Footsure(x) and Xenophobic(x) -> Indisposed(x))\nforall x (Footsure(x) and Cyclonical(x) -> not Indisposed(x))\n\nFootsure(dena)\n\nMorphemic(dena) and forall x (Morphemic(x) -> Cyclonical(x)) -> therefore Cyclonical(dena) Cyclonical(dena) and Cyclonical(dena) -> Footsure(dena) -> therefore Footsure(dena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Derick is contagious. Lissie is causative. Lissie is licensed. If Derick is faveolate then Derick is attached. If something is contagious then it is faveolate. If Derick is attached then Derick is indigo. If something is licensed and not causative then it is attached. If something is indigo and not faveolate then it is not licensed. If something is causative and faveolate then it is licensed. All attached, duodenal things are licensed. Green, faveolate things are not licensed. Derick is not attached.", "logic": "\nContagious(derick)\nCausative(lissie)\nLicensed(lissie)\nFaveolate(derick) -> Attached(derick)\nforall x (Contagious(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nAttached(derick) -> Indigo(derick)\nforall x (Licensed(x) and not Causative(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Indigo(x) and not Faveolate(x) -> not Licensed(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) and Faveolate(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Duodenal(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Faveolate(x) -> not Licensed(x))\n\nnot Attached(derick)\n\nContagious(derick) and forall x (Contagious(x) -> Faveolate(x)) -> therefore Faveolate(derick) Faveolate(derick) and Faveolate(derick) -> Attached(derick) -> therefore Attached(derick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Kariotta is screaming. Larisa is cuplike. Larisa is bilabiate. If Kariotta is lxxxi then Kariotta is unenviable. If something is screaming then it is lxxxi. If Kariotta is unenviable then Kariotta is newsless. If something is bilabiate and not cuplike then it is unenviable. If something is newsless and not lxxxi then it is not bilabiate. If something is cuplike and lxxxi then it is bilabiate. All unenviable, rejoicing things are bilabiate. Green, lxxxi things are not bilabiate. Kariotta is newsless.", "logic": "\nScreaming(kariotta)\nCuplike(larisa)\nBilabiate(larisa)\nLxxxi(kariotta) -> Unenviable(kariotta)\nforall x (Screaming(x) -> Lxxxi(x))\nUnenviable(kariotta) -> Newsless(kariotta)\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) and not Cuplike(x) -> Unenviable(x))\nforall x (Newsless(x) and not Lxxxi(x) -> not Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Cuplike(x) and Lxxxi(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Unenviable(x) and Rejoicing(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Unenviable(x) and Lxxxi(x) -> not Bilabiate(x))\n\nNewsless(kariotta)\n\nScreaming(kariotta) and forall x (Screaming(x) -> Lxxxi(x)) -> therefore Lxxxi(kariotta) Lxxxi(kariotta) and Lxxxi(kariotta) -> Unenviable(kariotta) -> therefore Unenviable(kariotta) Unenviable(kariotta) and Unenviable(kariotta) -> Newsless(kariotta) -> therefore Newsless(kariotta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Fortuna is lone. Lucius is nonnomadic. Lucius is concurring. If Fortuna is fragrant then Fortuna is metalloid. If something is lone then it is fragrant. If Fortuna is metalloid then Fortuna is undigested. If something is concurring and not nonnomadic then it is metalloid. If something is undigested and not fragrant then it is not concurring. If something is nonnomadic and fragrant then it is concurring. All metalloid, bicornuous things are concurring. Green, fragrant things are not concurring. Fortuna is not undigested.", "logic": "\nLone(fortuna)\nNonnomadic(lucius)\nConcurring(lucius)\nFragrant(fortuna) -> Metalloid(fortuna)\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Fragrant(x))\nMetalloid(fortuna) -> Undigested(fortuna)\nforall x (Concurring(x) and not Nonnomadic(x) -> Metalloid(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) and not Fragrant(x) -> not Concurring(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) and Fragrant(x) -> Concurring(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Bicornuous(x) -> Concurring(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Fragrant(x) -> not Concurring(x))\n\nnot Undigested(fortuna)\n\nLone(fortuna) and forall x (Lone(x) -> Fragrant(x)) -> therefore Fragrant(fortuna) Fragrant(fortuna) and Fragrant(fortuna) -> Metalloid(fortuna) -> therefore Metalloid(fortuna) Metalloid(fortuna) and Metalloid(fortuna) -> Undigested(fortuna) -> therefore Undigested(fortuna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Rubetta is living. Cecelia is onside. Cecelia is episodic. If Rubetta is heedful then Rubetta is uncreased. If something is living then it is heedful. If Rubetta is uncreased then Rubetta is answering. If something is episodic and not onside then it is uncreased. If something is answering and not heedful then it is not episodic. If something is onside and heedful then it is episodic. All uncreased, greensick things are episodic. Green, heedful things are not episodic. Cecelia is not uncreased.", "logic": "\nLiving(rubetta)\nOnside(cecelia)\nEpisodic(cecelia)\nHeedful(rubetta) -> Uncreased(rubetta)\nforall x (Living(x) -> Heedful(x))\nUncreased(rubetta) -> Answering(rubetta)\nforall x (Episodic(x) and not Onside(x) -> Uncreased(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) and not Heedful(x) -> not Episodic(x))\nforall x (Onside(x) and Heedful(x) -> Episodic(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Greensick(x) -> Episodic(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) and Heedful(x) -> not Episodic(x))\n\nnot Uncreased(cecelia)\n\nforall x (Episodic(x) and not Onside(x) -> Uncreased(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Elmore is misogynous. Helga is slicked. Helga is bimetal. If Elmore is auriferous then Elmore is getable. If something is misogynous then it is auriferous. If Elmore is getable then Elmore is bulging. If something is bimetal and not slicked then it is getable. If something is bulging and not auriferous then it is not bimetal. If something is slicked and auriferous then it is bimetal. All getable, cataclinal things are bimetal. Green, auriferous things are not bimetal. Helga is auriferous.", "logic": "\nMisogynous(elmore)\nSlicked(helga)\nBimetal(helga)\nAuriferous(elmore) -> Getable(elmore)\nforall x (Misogynous(x) -> Auriferous(x))\nGetable(elmore) -> Bulging(elmore)\nforall x (Bimetal(x) and not Slicked(x) -> Getable(x))\nforall x (Bulging(x) and not Auriferous(x) -> not Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) and Auriferous(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) and Cataclinal(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) and Auriferous(x) -> not Bimetal(x))\n\nAuriferous(helga)\n\nforall x (Misogynous(x) -> Auriferous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Jacky is suicidal. Oralla is grooved. Oralla is boffo. If Jacky is eyeless then Jacky is tapering. If something is suicidal then it is eyeless. If Jacky is tapering then Jacky is unthematic. If something is boffo and not grooved then it is tapering. If something is unthematic and not eyeless then it is not boffo. If something is grooved and eyeless then it is boffo. All tapering, negro things are boffo. Green, eyeless things are not boffo. Jacky is not negro.", "logic": "\nSuicidal(jacky)\nGrooved(oralla)\nBoffo(oralla)\nEyeless(jacky) -> Tapering(jacky)\nforall x (Suicidal(x) -> Eyeless(x))\nTapering(jacky) -> Unthematic(jacky)\nforall x (Boffo(x) and not Grooved(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) and not Eyeless(x) -> not Boffo(x))\nforall x (Grooved(x) and Eyeless(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Tapering(x) and Negro(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Tapering(x) and Eyeless(x) -> not Boffo(x))\n\nnot Negro(jacky)\n\nnot Negro(jacky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Breena is cliquish. Jens is mesmerized. Jens is paroicous. If Breena is staple then Breena is cometary. If something is cliquish then it is staple. If Breena is cometary then Breena is aldermanly. If something is paroicous and not mesmerized then it is cometary. If something is aldermanly and not staple then it is not paroicous. If something is mesmerized and staple then it is paroicous. All cometary, helmeted things are paroicous. Green, staple things are not paroicous. Jens is aldermanly.", "logic": "\nCliquish(breena)\nMesmerized(jens)\nParoicous(jens)\nStaple(breena) -> Cometary(breena)\nforall x (Cliquish(x) -> Staple(x))\nCometary(breena) -> Aldermanly(breena)\nforall x (Paroicous(x) and not Mesmerized(x) -> Cometary(x))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) and not Staple(x) -> not Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Staple(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Cometary(x) and Helmeted(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Cometary(x) and Staple(x) -> not Paroicous(x))\n\nAldermanly(jens)\n\nAldermanly(jens) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Blair is burning. Ricardo is fictive. Ricardo is solitary. If Blair is passerine then Blair is misrelated. If something is burning then it is passerine. If Blair is misrelated then Blair is colonial. If something is solitary and not fictive then it is misrelated. If something is colonial and not passerine then it is not solitary. If something is fictive and passerine then it is solitary. All misrelated, filthy things are solitary. Green, passerine things are not solitary. Ricardo is not burning.", "logic": "\nBurning(blair)\nFictive(ricardo)\nSolitary(ricardo)\nPasserine(blair) -> Misrelated(blair)\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Passerine(x))\nMisrelated(blair) -> Colonial(blair)\nforall x (Solitary(x) and not Fictive(x) -> Misrelated(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) and not Passerine(x) -> not Solitary(x))\nforall x (Fictive(x) and Passerine(x) -> Solitary(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) and Filthy(x) -> Solitary(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) and Passerine(x) -> not Solitary(x))\n\nnot Burning(ricardo)\n\nnot Burning(ricardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Laraine is marvelous. Glennie is catabatic. Glennie is adenoidal. If Laraine is incurious then Laraine is ferocious. If something is marvelous then it is incurious. If Laraine is ferocious then Laraine is puzzling. If something is adenoidal and not catabatic then it is ferocious. If something is puzzling and not incurious then it is not adenoidal. If something is catabatic and incurious then it is adenoidal. All ferocious, reparable things are adenoidal. Green, incurious things are not adenoidal. Glennie is reparable.", "logic": "\nMarvelous(laraine)\nCatabatic(glennie)\nAdenoidal(glennie)\nIncurious(laraine) -> Ferocious(laraine)\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> Incurious(x))\nFerocious(laraine) -> Puzzling(laraine)\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) and not Catabatic(x) -> Ferocious(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) and not Incurious(x) -> not Adenoidal(x))\nforall x (Catabatic(x) and Incurious(x) -> Adenoidal(x))\nforall x (Ferocious(x) and Reparable(x) -> Adenoidal(x))\nforall x (Ferocious(x) and Incurious(x) -> not Adenoidal(x))\n\nReparable(glennie)\n\nReparable(glennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Faustina is biennial. Nedi is biennial. Sarette is rearward. Yard is rwandan. White, rwandan things are biennial. If something is rwandan then it is autacoidal. All biennial things are rearward. Yard is rwandan.", "logic": "\nBiennial(faustina)\nBiennial(nedi)\nRearward(sarette)\nRwandan(yard)\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and Rwandan(x) -> Biennial(x))\nforall x (Rwandan(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\nforall x (Biennial(x) -> Rearward(x))\n\nRwandan(yard)\n\ntherefore Rwandan(yard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Zacherie is talky. Vin is talky. Aldo is nomadic. Midge is diverted. White, diverted things are talky. If something is diverted then it is lamblike. All talky things are nomadic. Aldo is not nomadic.", "logic": "\nTalky(zacherie)\nTalky(vin)\nNomadic(aldo)\nDiverted(midge)\nforall x (Lamblike(x) and Diverted(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nforall x (Talky(x) -> Nomadic(x))\n\nnot Nomadic(aldo)\n\ntherefore Nomadic(aldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Alisha is sumatran. Petrina is sumatran. Tedie is haywire. Brana is hedonistic. White, hedonistic things are sumatran. If something is hedonistic then it is clinical. All sumatran things are haywire. Alisha is haywire.", "logic": "\nSumatran(alisha)\nSumatran(petrina)\nHaywire(tedie)\nHedonistic(brana)\nforall x (Clinical(x) and Hedonistic(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nforall x (Hedonistic(x) -> Clinical(x))\nforall x (Sumatran(x) -> Haywire(x))\n\nHaywire(alisha)\n\nSumatran(alisha) and forall x (Sumatran(x) -> Haywire(x)) -> therefore Haywire(alisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Vita is unwounded. Garnet is unwounded. Eustace is prosaic. Livia is gonzo. White, gonzo things are unwounded. If something is gonzo then it is unaffected. All unwounded things are prosaic. Garnet is not prosaic.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(vita)\nUnwounded(garnet)\nProsaic(eustace)\nGonzo(livia)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) -> Prosaic(x))\n\nnot Prosaic(garnet)\n\nUnwounded(garnet) and forall x (Unwounded(x) -> Prosaic(x)) -> therefore Prosaic(garnet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Janna is admittible. Hermann is admittible. Sheelah is univalve. Ferinand is larghetto. White, larghetto things are admittible. If something is larghetto then it is stomachal. All admittible things are univalve. Ferinand is admittible.", "logic": "\nAdmittible(janna)\nAdmittible(hermann)\nUnivalve(sheelah)\nLarghetto(ferinand)\nforall x (Stomachal(x) and Larghetto(x) -> Admittible(x))\nforall x (Larghetto(x) -> Stomachal(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) -> Univalve(x))\n\nAdmittible(ferinand)\n\nLarghetto(ferinand) and forall x (Larghetto(x) -> Stomachal(x)) -> therefore Stomachal(ferinand) Stomachal(ferinand) and Larghetto(ferinand) and forall x (Stomachal(x) and Larghetto(x) -> Admittible(x)) -> therefore Admittible(ferinand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Josie is shaven. Weston is shaven. Wendie is deadlocked. Lanni is unblinking. White, unblinking things are shaven. If something is unblinking then it is alveolate. All shaven things are deadlocked. Lanni is not shaven.", "logic": "\nShaven(josie)\nShaven(weston)\nDeadlocked(wendie)\nUnblinking(lanni)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) and Unblinking(x) -> Shaven(x))\nforall x (Unblinking(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Deadlocked(x))\n\nnot Shaven(lanni)\n\nUnblinking(lanni) and forall x (Unblinking(x) -> Alveolate(x)) -> therefore Alveolate(lanni) Alveolate(lanni) and Unblinking(lanni) and forall x (Alveolate(x) and Unblinking(x) -> Shaven(x)) -> therefore Shaven(lanni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Laurette is grumpy. Elliot is grumpy. Kare is digestive. Hew is lumbar. White, lumbar things are grumpy. If something is lumbar then it is urogenital. All grumpy things are digestive. Hew is digestive.", "logic": "\nGrumpy(laurette)\nGrumpy(elliot)\nDigestive(kare)\nLumbar(hew)\nforall x (Urogenital(x) and Lumbar(x) -> Grumpy(x))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) -> Urogenital(x))\nforall x (Grumpy(x) -> Digestive(x))\n\nDigestive(hew)\n\nLumbar(hew) and forall x (Lumbar(x) -> Urogenital(x)) -> therefore Urogenital(hew) Urogenital(hew) and Lumbar(hew) and forall x (Urogenital(x) and Lumbar(x) -> Grumpy(x)) -> therefore Grumpy(hew) Grumpy(hew) and forall x (Grumpy(x) -> Digestive(x)) -> therefore Digestive(hew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Lorette is ghostlike. Tann is ghostlike. Lila is tearaway. Florice is culpable. White, culpable things are ghostlike. If something is culpable then it is jacobean. All ghostlike things are tearaway. Florice is not tearaway.", "logic": "\nGhostlike(lorette)\nGhostlike(tann)\nTearaway(lila)\nCulpable(florice)\nforall x (Jacobean(x) and Culpable(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Jacobean(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Tearaway(x))\n\nnot Tearaway(florice)\n\nCulpable(florice) and forall x (Culpable(x) -> Jacobean(x)) -> therefore Jacobean(florice) Jacobean(florice) and Culpable(florice) and forall x (Jacobean(x) and Culpable(x) -> Ghostlike(x)) -> therefore Ghostlike(florice) Ghostlike(florice) and forall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Tearaway(x)) -> therefore Tearaway(florice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Lloyd is integrated. Monika is integrated. Thebault is sought. Ignazio is struggling. White, struggling things are integrated. If something is struggling then it is general. All integrated things are sought. Monika is not general.", "logic": "\nIntegrated(lloyd)\nIntegrated(monika)\nSought(thebault)\nStruggling(ignazio)\nforall x (General(x) and Struggling(x) -> Integrated(x))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> General(x))\nforall x (Integrated(x) -> Sought(x))\n\nnot General(monika)\n\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> General(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Merlin is unmelodic. Grete is unmelodic. Babara is sufficient. Marchall is final. White, final things are unmelodic. If something is final then it is ashen. All unmelodic things are sufficient. Babara is unmelodic.", "logic": "\nUnmelodic(merlin)\nUnmelodic(grete)\nSufficient(babara)\nFinal(marchall)\nforall x (Ashen(x) and Final(x) -> Unmelodic(x))\nforall x (Final(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Unmelodic(x) -> Sufficient(x))\n\nUnmelodic(babara)\n\nforall x (Ashen(x) and Final(x) -> Unmelodic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Sydney is coaxial. Mary is coaxial. Grace is seaward. Denyse is loony. White, loony things are coaxial. If something is loony then it is bungling. All coaxial things are seaward. Sydney is not bungling.", "logic": "\nCoaxial(sydney)\nCoaxial(mary)\nSeaward(grace)\nLoony(denyse)\nforall x (Bungling(x) and Loony(x) -> Coaxial(x))\nforall x (Loony(x) -> Bungling(x))\nforall x (Coaxial(x) -> Seaward(x))\n\nnot Bungling(sydney)\n\nforall x (Loony(x) -> Bungling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Roselin is like. Greer is like. Vassili is dogmatical. Michel is pneumonic. White, pneumonic things are like. If something is pneumonic then it is sufferable. All like things are dogmatical. Vassili is sufferable.", "logic": "\nLike(roselin)\nLike(greer)\nDogmatical(vassili)\nPneumonic(michel)\nforall x (Sufferable(x) and Pneumonic(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Pneumonic(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Like(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\n\nSufferable(vassili)\n\nforall x (Pneumonic(x) -> Sufferable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Tobie is knavish. Cristabel is knavish. Bettie is tomboyish. Charlotta is wordy. White, wordy things are knavish. If something is wordy then it is heedless. All knavish things are tomboyish. Tobie is not smart.", "logic": "\nKnavish(tobie)\nKnavish(cristabel)\nTomboyish(bettie)\nWordy(charlotta)\nforall x (Heedless(x) and Wordy(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) -> Heedless(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\n\nnot Smart(tobie)\n\nnot Smart(tobie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Guy is reliant. Hulda is reliant. Issi is rush. Viviene is heartless. White, heartless things are reliant. If something is heartless then it is ritual. All reliant things are rush. Guy is heartless.", "logic": "\nReliant(guy)\nReliant(hulda)\nRush(issi)\nHeartless(viviene)\nforall x (Ritual(x) and Heartless(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Heartless(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Reliant(x) -> Rush(x))\n\nHeartless(guy)\n\nHeartless(guy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Judith is cachectic. Trent is cachectic. Madelene is hearsay. Gloriane is seriocomic. White, seriocomic things are cachectic. If something is seriocomic then it is backless. All cachectic things are hearsay. Gloriane is not smart.", "logic": "\nCachectic(judith)\nCachectic(trent)\nHearsay(madelene)\nSeriocomic(gloriane)\nforall x (Backless(x) and Seriocomic(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) -> Backless(x))\nforall x (Cachectic(x) -> Hearsay(x))\n\nnot Smart(gloriane)\n\nnot Smart(gloriane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Amata is isochronal. Gabie is isochronal. Rosene is alveolar. Archie is debased. White, debased things are isochronal. If something is debased then it is mithraic. All isochronal things are alveolar. Rosene is young.", "logic": "\nIsochronal(amata)\nIsochronal(gabie)\nAlveolar(rosene)\nDebased(archie)\nforall x (Mithraic(x) and Debased(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Isochronal(x) -> Alveolar(x))\n\nYoung(rosene)\n\nYoung(rosene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Hally is agreeable. Hally is whispered. Townie is whispered. Townie is celibate. Townie is reasonable. Greggory is easterly. Greggory is agreeable. Greggory is reasonable. Graehme is inviting. Graehme is easterly. Graehme is agreeable. Graehme is whispered. Graehme is lethal. Graehme is celibate. Graehme is reasonable. If someone is whispered and celibate then they are agreeable. White, lethal people are easterly. All whispered, agreeable people are lethal. Graehme is inviting.", "logic": "\nAgreeable(hally)\nWhispered(hally)\nWhispered(townie)\nCelibate(townie)\nReasonable(townie)\nEasterly(greggory)\nAgreeable(greggory)\nReasonable(greggory)\nInviting(graehme)\nEasterly(graehme)\nAgreeable(graehme)\nWhispered(graehme)\nLethal(graehme)\nCelibate(graehme)\nReasonable(graehme)\nforall x (Whispered(x) and Celibate(x) -> Agreeable(x))\nforall x (Celibate(x) and Lethal(x) -> Easterly(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) and Agreeable(x) -> Lethal(x))\n\nInviting(graehme)\n\ntherefore Inviting(graehme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Ashli is scheduled. Ashli is topless. Eadith is topless. Eadith is lowland. Eadith is cometary. Cammy is candied. Cammy is scheduled. Cammy is cometary. Neel is bipartisan. Neel is candied. Neel is scheduled. Neel is topless. Neel is converse. Neel is lowland. Neel is cometary. If someone is topless and lowland then they are scheduled. White, converse people are candied. All topless, scheduled people are converse. Ashli is not scheduled.", "logic": "\nScheduled(ashli)\nTopless(ashli)\nTopless(eadith)\nLowland(eadith)\nCometary(eadith)\nCandied(cammy)\nScheduled(cammy)\nCometary(cammy)\nBipartisan(neel)\nCandied(neel)\nScheduled(neel)\nTopless(neel)\nConverse(neel)\nLowland(neel)\nCometary(neel)\nforall x (Topless(x) and Lowland(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Lowland(x) and Converse(x) -> Candied(x))\nforall x (Topless(x) and Scheduled(x) -> Converse(x))\n\nnot Scheduled(ashli)\n\ntherefore Scheduled(ashli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Jeth is cranial. Jeth is supplicant. Joelie is supplicant. Joelie is unattended. Joelie is rudderless. Waleed is avifaunal. Waleed is cranial. Waleed is rudderless. Sasha is isosceles. Sasha is avifaunal. Sasha is cranial. Sasha is supplicant. Sasha is unsilenced. Sasha is unattended. Sasha is rudderless. If someone is supplicant and unattended then they are cranial. White, unsilenced people are avifaunal. All supplicant, cranial people are unsilenced. Jeth is unsilenced.", "logic": "\nCranial(jeth)\nSupplicant(jeth)\nSupplicant(joelie)\nUnattended(joelie)\nRudderless(joelie)\nAvifaunal(waleed)\nCranial(waleed)\nRudderless(waleed)\nIsosceles(sasha)\nAvifaunal(sasha)\nCranial(sasha)\nSupplicant(sasha)\nUnsilenced(sasha)\nUnattended(sasha)\nRudderless(sasha)\nforall x (Supplicant(x) and Unattended(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Unattended(x) and Unsilenced(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) and Cranial(x) -> Unsilenced(x))\n\nUnsilenced(jeth)\n\nSupplicant(jeth) and Cranial(jeth) and forall x (Supplicant(x) and Cranial(x) -> Unsilenced(x)) -> therefore Unsilenced(jeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Gray is possible. Gray is untraveled. Tani is untraveled. Tani is wizardly. Tani is delighted. Etty is precocious. Etty is possible. Etty is delighted. Jobey is seamanly. Jobey is precocious. Jobey is possible. Jobey is untraveled. Jobey is marvellous. Jobey is wizardly. Jobey is delighted. If someone is untraveled and wizardly then they are possible. White, marvellous people are precocious. All untraveled, possible people are marvellous. Tani is not possible.", "logic": "\nPossible(gray)\nUntraveled(gray)\nUntraveled(tani)\nWizardly(tani)\nDelighted(tani)\nPrecocious(etty)\nPossible(etty)\nDelighted(etty)\nSeamanly(jobey)\nPrecocious(jobey)\nPossible(jobey)\nUntraveled(jobey)\nMarvellous(jobey)\nWizardly(jobey)\nDelighted(jobey)\nforall x (Untraveled(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Possible(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) and Marvellous(x) -> Precocious(x))\nforall x (Untraveled(x) and Possible(x) -> Marvellous(x))\n\nnot Possible(tani)\n\nUntraveled(tani) and Wizardly(tani) and forall x (Untraveled(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Possible(x)) -> therefore Possible(tani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Lillian is intrastate. Lillian is farseeing. Price is farseeing. Price is reasoning. Price is starlike. Vince is selfless. Vince is intrastate. Vince is starlike. Sven is catching. Sven is selfless. Sven is intrastate. Sven is farseeing. Sven is daunted. Sven is reasoning. Sven is starlike. If someone is farseeing and reasoning then they are intrastate. White, daunted people are selfless. All farseeing, intrastate people are daunted. Price is daunted.", "logic": "\nIntrastate(lillian)\nFarseeing(lillian)\nFarseeing(price)\nReasoning(price)\nStarlike(price)\nSelfless(vince)\nIntrastate(vince)\nStarlike(vince)\nCatching(sven)\nSelfless(sven)\nIntrastate(sven)\nFarseeing(sven)\nDaunted(sven)\nReasoning(sven)\nStarlike(sven)\nforall x (Farseeing(x) and Reasoning(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) and Daunted(x) -> Selfless(x))\nforall x (Farseeing(x) and Intrastate(x) -> Daunted(x))\n\nDaunted(price)\n\nFarseeing(price) and Reasoning(price) and forall x (Farseeing(x) and Reasoning(x) -> Intrastate(x)) -> therefore Intrastate(price) Farseeing(price) and Intrastate(price) and forall x (Farseeing(x) and Intrastate(x) -> Daunted(x)) -> therefore Daunted(price)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Terence is forlorn. Terence is copernican. Raine is copernican. Raine is bosnian. Raine is laurelled. Joelie is abulic. Joelie is forlorn. Joelie is laurelled. Micah is plumy. Micah is abulic. Micah is forlorn. Micah is copernican. Micah is adducent. Micah is bosnian. Micah is laurelled. If someone is copernican and bosnian then they are forlorn. White, adducent people are abulic. All copernican, forlorn people are adducent. Raine is not adducent.", "logic": "\nForlorn(terence)\nCopernican(terence)\nCopernican(raine)\nBosnian(raine)\nLaurelled(raine)\nAbulic(joelie)\nForlorn(joelie)\nLaurelled(joelie)\nPlumy(micah)\nAbulic(micah)\nForlorn(micah)\nCopernican(micah)\nAdducent(micah)\nBosnian(micah)\nLaurelled(micah)\nforall x (Copernican(x) and Bosnian(x) -> Forlorn(x))\nforall x (Bosnian(x) and Adducent(x) -> Abulic(x))\nforall x (Copernican(x) and Forlorn(x) -> Adducent(x))\n\nnot Adducent(raine)\n\nCopernican(raine) and Bosnian(raine) and forall x (Copernican(x) and Bosnian(x) -> Forlorn(x)) -> therefore Forlorn(raine) Copernican(raine) and Forlorn(raine) and forall x (Copernican(x) and Forlorn(x) -> Adducent(x)) -> therefore Adducent(raine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Ilsa is wholesale. Ilsa is orthoptic. Olwen is orthoptic. Olwen is viral. Olwen is bereaved. Blanca is naif. Blanca is wholesale. Blanca is bereaved. Gene is eulogistic. Gene is naif. Gene is wholesale. Gene is orthoptic. Gene is undreamed. Gene is viral. Gene is bereaved. If someone is orthoptic and viral then they are wholesale. White, undreamed people are naif. All orthoptic, wholesale people are undreamed. Olwen is naif.", "logic": "\nWholesale(ilsa)\nOrthoptic(ilsa)\nOrthoptic(olwen)\nViral(olwen)\nBereaved(olwen)\nNaif(blanca)\nWholesale(blanca)\nBereaved(blanca)\nEulogistic(gene)\nNaif(gene)\nWholesale(gene)\nOrthoptic(gene)\nUndreamed(gene)\nViral(gene)\nBereaved(gene)\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) and Viral(x) -> Wholesale(x))\nforall x (Viral(x) and Undreamed(x) -> Naif(x))\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) and Wholesale(x) -> Undreamed(x))\n\nNaif(olwen)\n\nOrthoptic(olwen) and Viral(olwen) and forall x (Orthoptic(x) and Viral(x) -> Wholesale(x)) -> therefore Wholesale(olwen) Orthoptic(olwen) and Wholesale(olwen) and forall x (Orthoptic(x) and Wholesale(x) -> Undreamed(x)) -> therefore Undreamed(olwen) Viral(olwen) and Undreamed(olwen) and forall x (Viral(x) and Undreamed(x) -> Naif(x)) -> therefore Naif(olwen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Rutledge is unfading. Rutledge is ignitible. Arden is ignitible. Arden is unhindered. Arden is sizeable. Jordon is paperback. Jordon is unfading. Jordon is sizeable. Paulette is spiritless. Paulette is paperback. Paulette is unfading. Paulette is ignitible. Paulette is ambulacral. Paulette is unhindered. Paulette is sizeable. If someone is ignitible and unhindered then they are unfading. White, ambulacral people are paperback. All ignitible, unfading people are ambulacral. Arden is not paperback.", "logic": "\nUnfading(rutledge)\nIgnitible(rutledge)\nIgnitible(arden)\nUnhindered(arden)\nSizeable(arden)\nPaperback(jordon)\nUnfading(jordon)\nSizeable(jordon)\nSpiritless(paulette)\nPaperback(paulette)\nUnfading(paulette)\nIgnitible(paulette)\nAmbulacral(paulette)\nUnhindered(paulette)\nSizeable(paulette)\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Unhindered(x) -> Unfading(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and Ambulacral(x) -> Paperback(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Unfading(x) -> Ambulacral(x))\n\nnot Paperback(arden)\n\nIgnitible(arden) and Unhindered(arden) and forall x (Ignitible(x) and Unhindered(x) -> Unfading(x)) -> therefore Unfading(arden) Ignitible(arden) and Unfading(arden) and forall x (Ignitible(x) and Unfading(x) -> Ambulacral(x)) -> therefore Ambulacral(arden) Unhindered(arden) and Ambulacral(arden) and forall x (Unhindered(x) and Ambulacral(x) -> Paperback(x)) -> therefore Paperback(arden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Ansel is noncaloric. Ansel is suspended. Zach is suspended. Zach is comical. Zach is tumescent. Brad is rivalrous. Brad is noncaloric. Brad is tumescent. Samuel is unhearing. Samuel is rivalrous. Samuel is noncaloric. Samuel is suspended. Samuel is weepy. Samuel is comical. Samuel is tumescent. If someone is suspended and comical then they are noncaloric. White, weepy people are rivalrous. All suspended, noncaloric people are weepy. Brad is not weepy.", "logic": "\nNoncaloric(ansel)\nSuspended(ansel)\nSuspended(zach)\nComical(zach)\nTumescent(zach)\nRivalrous(brad)\nNoncaloric(brad)\nTumescent(brad)\nUnhearing(samuel)\nRivalrous(samuel)\nNoncaloric(samuel)\nSuspended(samuel)\nWeepy(samuel)\nComical(samuel)\nTumescent(samuel)\nforall x (Suspended(x) and Comical(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Comical(x) and Weepy(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nforall x (Suspended(x) and Noncaloric(x) -> Weepy(x))\n\nnot Weepy(brad)\n\nforall x (Suspended(x) and Noncaloric(x) -> Weepy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Siward is epicurean. Siward is lowborn. Muffin is lowborn. Muffin is copulatory. Muffin is assailable. Bridgette is radiopaque. Bridgette is epicurean. Bridgette is assailable. Harlene is wellborn. Harlene is radiopaque. Harlene is epicurean. Harlene is lowborn. Harlene is frostian. Harlene is copulatory. Harlene is assailable. If someone is lowborn and copulatory then they are epicurean. White, frostian people are radiopaque. All lowborn, epicurean people are frostian. Siward is radiopaque.", "logic": "\nEpicurean(siward)\nLowborn(siward)\nLowborn(muffin)\nCopulatory(muffin)\nAssailable(muffin)\nRadiopaque(bridgette)\nEpicurean(bridgette)\nAssailable(bridgette)\nWellborn(harlene)\nRadiopaque(harlene)\nEpicurean(harlene)\nLowborn(harlene)\nFrostian(harlene)\nCopulatory(harlene)\nAssailable(harlene)\nforall x (Lowborn(x) and Copulatory(x) -> Epicurean(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) and Frostian(x) -> Radiopaque(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) and Epicurean(x) -> Frostian(x))\n\nRadiopaque(siward)\n\nforall x (Copulatory(x) and Frostian(x) -> Radiopaque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Flo is candid. Flo is engrossing. Therese is engrossing. Therese is overgrown. Therese is hydroxy. Johannah is exiguous. Johannah is candid. Johannah is hydroxy. Torrence is moderato. Torrence is exiguous. Torrence is candid. Torrence is engrossing. Torrence is vexatious. Torrence is overgrown. Torrence is hydroxy. If someone is engrossing and overgrown then they are candid. White, vexatious people are exiguous. All engrossing, candid people are vexatious. Flo is not overgrown.", "logic": "\nCandid(flo)\nEngrossing(flo)\nEngrossing(therese)\nOvergrown(therese)\nHydroxy(therese)\nExiguous(johannah)\nCandid(johannah)\nHydroxy(johannah)\nModerato(torrence)\nExiguous(torrence)\nCandid(torrence)\nEngrossing(torrence)\nVexatious(torrence)\nOvergrown(torrence)\nHydroxy(torrence)\nforall x (Engrossing(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Candid(x))\nforall x (Overgrown(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Exiguous(x))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) and Candid(x) -> Vexatious(x))\n\nnot Overgrown(flo)\n\nnot Overgrown(flo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Sacha is unreal. Sacha is aecial. Berenice is aecial. Berenice is choosey. Berenice is bobtail. Agamemnon is titled. Agamemnon is unreal. Agamemnon is bobtail. Griff is drilled. Griff is titled. Griff is unreal. Griff is aecial. Griff is lowering. Griff is choosey. Griff is bobtail. If someone is aecial and choosey then they are unreal. White, lowering people are titled. All aecial, unreal people are lowering. Sacha is bobtail.", "logic": "\nUnreal(sacha)\nAecial(sacha)\nAecial(berenice)\nChoosey(berenice)\nBobtail(berenice)\nTitled(agamemnon)\nUnreal(agamemnon)\nBobtail(agamemnon)\nDrilled(griff)\nTitled(griff)\nUnreal(griff)\nAecial(griff)\nLowering(griff)\nChoosey(griff)\nBobtail(griff)\nforall x (Aecial(x) and Choosey(x) -> Unreal(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Lowering(x) -> Titled(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) and Unreal(x) -> Lowering(x))\n\nBobtail(sacha)\n\nBobtail(sacha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Fidela is qualified. Fidela is repellent. Burgess is repellent. Burgess is diabetic. Burgess is eighty. Berta is firstborn. Berta is qualified. Berta is eighty. Alida is prudish. Alida is firstborn. Alida is qualified. Alida is repellent. Alida is unpunctual. Alida is diabetic. Alida is eighty. If someone is repellent and diabetic then they are qualified. White, unpunctual people are firstborn. All repellent, qualified people are unpunctual. Berta is not repellent.", "logic": "\nQualified(fidela)\nRepellent(fidela)\nRepellent(burgess)\nDiabetic(burgess)\nEighty(burgess)\nFirstborn(berta)\nQualified(berta)\nEighty(berta)\nPrudish(alida)\nFirstborn(alida)\nQualified(alida)\nRepellent(alida)\nUnpunctual(alida)\nDiabetic(alida)\nEighty(alida)\nforall x (Repellent(x) and Diabetic(x) -> Qualified(x))\nforall x (Diabetic(x) and Unpunctual(x) -> Firstborn(x))\nforall x (Repellent(x) and Qualified(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\n\nnot Repellent(berta)\n\nnot Repellent(berta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Estell is inhumed. Estell is leptorhine. Marybelle is leptorhine. Marybelle is mingy. Marybelle is nonrigid. Thatch is nonmodern. Thatch is inhumed. Thatch is nonrigid. Goldie is unhygienic. Goldie is nonmodern. Goldie is inhumed. Goldie is leptorhine. Goldie is larval. Goldie is mingy. Goldie is nonrigid. If someone is leptorhine and mingy then they are inhumed. White, larval people are nonmodern. All leptorhine, inhumed people are larval. Marybelle is unhygienic.", "logic": "\nInhumed(estell)\nLeptorhine(estell)\nLeptorhine(marybelle)\nMingy(marybelle)\nNonrigid(marybelle)\nNonmodern(thatch)\nInhumed(thatch)\nNonrigid(thatch)\nUnhygienic(goldie)\nNonmodern(goldie)\nInhumed(goldie)\nLeptorhine(goldie)\nLarval(goldie)\nMingy(goldie)\nNonrigid(goldie)\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) and Mingy(x) -> Inhumed(x))\nforall x (Mingy(x) and Larval(x) -> Nonmodern(x))\nforall x (Leptorhine(x) and Inhumed(x) -> Larval(x))\n\nUnhygienic(marybelle)\n\nUnhygienic(marybelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Colly is folksy. Colly is norwegian. Rudolph is norwegian. Rudolph is loopy. Rudolph is pyknic. Lemmy is contrasty. Lemmy is folksy. Lemmy is pyknic. Garry is simplistic. Garry is contrasty. Garry is folksy. Garry is norwegian. Garry is debauched. Garry is loopy. Garry is pyknic. If someone is norwegian and loopy then they are folksy. White, debauched people are contrasty. All norwegian, folksy people are debauched. Lemmy is not loopy.", "logic": "\nFolksy(colly)\nNorwegian(colly)\nNorwegian(rudolph)\nLoopy(rudolph)\nPyknic(rudolph)\nContrasty(lemmy)\nFolksy(lemmy)\nPyknic(lemmy)\nSimplistic(garry)\nContrasty(garry)\nFolksy(garry)\nNorwegian(garry)\nDebauched(garry)\nLoopy(garry)\nPyknic(garry)\nforall x (Norwegian(x) and Loopy(x) -> Folksy(x))\nforall x (Loopy(x) and Debauched(x) -> Contrasty(x))\nforall x (Norwegian(x) and Folksy(x) -> Debauched(x))\n\nnot Loopy(lemmy)\n\nnot Loopy(lemmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Eadie is computable. Eadie is outlawed. Marci is outlawed. Marci is haunting. Marci is oaten. Isidore is desultory. Isidore is computable. Isidore is oaten. Annnora is theoretic. Annnora is desultory. Annnora is computable. Annnora is outlawed. Annnora is awry. Annnora is haunting. Annnora is oaten. If someone is outlawed and haunting then they are computable. White, awry people are desultory. All outlawed, computable people are awry. Eadie is theoretic.", "logic": "\nComputable(eadie)\nOutlawed(eadie)\nOutlawed(marci)\nHaunting(marci)\nOaten(marci)\nDesultory(isidore)\nComputable(isidore)\nOaten(isidore)\nTheoretic(annnora)\nDesultory(annnora)\nComputable(annnora)\nOutlawed(annnora)\nAwry(annnora)\nHaunting(annnora)\nOaten(annnora)\nforall x (Outlawed(x) and Haunting(x) -> Computable(x))\nforall x (Haunting(x) and Awry(x) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Outlawed(x) and Computable(x) -> Awry(x))\n\nTheoretic(eadie)\n\nTheoretic(eadie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "The charita clank the priscilla. The charita is not softish. The charita is canny. The charita is not anoxic. The charita is abysmal. The charita is spick. The charita sacrifice the priscilla. The charita nosh the priscilla. The priscilla is anoxic. The priscilla is abysmal. The priscilla sacrifice the charita. The priscilla nosh the charita. If something nosh the priscilla and the priscilla nosh the charita then it sacrifice the priscilla. If something is anoxic and softish then it does not need the priscilla. If something sacrifice the priscilla then the priscilla is spick. If the priscilla is abysmal and the priscilla clank the charita then the priscilla is not canny. If something nosh the charita and the charita does not need the priscilla then the charita sacrifice the priscilla. If something is spick then it clank the charita. The charita is spick.", "logic": "\nClank(charita, priscilla)\nnot Softish(charita)\nCanny(charita)\nnot Anoxic(charita)\nAbysmal(charita)\nSpick(charita)\nSacrifice(charita, priscilla)\nNosh(charita, priscilla)\nAnoxic(priscilla)\nAbysmal(priscilla)\nSacrifice(priscilla, charita)\nNosh(priscilla, charita)\nforall x (Nosh(x, priscilla) and Nosh(priscilla, charita) -> Sacrifice(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Anoxic(x) and Softish(x) -> not Nosh(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, priscilla) -> Spick(priscilla))\nAbysmal(priscilla) and Clank(priscilla, charita) -> not Canny(priscilla)\nforall x (Nosh(x, charita) and not Nosh(charita, priscilla) -> Sacrifice(charita, priscilla))\nforall x (Spick(x) -> Clank(x, charita))\n\nSpick(charita)\n\ntherefore Spick(charita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The redford inhibit the antonetta. The redford is not pervious. The redford is xxviii. The redford is not anguine. The redford is axillary. The redford is biomedical. The redford catapult the antonetta. The redford ravel the antonetta. The antonetta is anguine. The antonetta is axillary. The antonetta catapult the redford. The antonetta ravel the redford. If something ravel the antonetta and the antonetta ravel the redford then it catapult the antonetta. If something is anguine and pervious then it does not need the antonetta. If something catapult the antonetta then the antonetta is biomedical. If the antonetta is axillary and the antonetta inhibit the redford then the antonetta is not xxviii. If something ravel the redford and the redford does not need the antonetta then the redford catapult the antonetta. If something is biomedical then it inhibit the redford. The redford is pervious.", "logic": "\nInhibit(redford, antonetta)\nnot Pervious(redford)\nXxviii(redford)\nnot Anguine(redford)\nAxillary(redford)\nBiomedical(redford)\nCatapult(redford, antonetta)\nRavel(redford, antonetta)\nAnguine(antonetta)\nAxillary(antonetta)\nCatapult(antonetta, redford)\nRavel(antonetta, redford)\nforall x (Ravel(x, antonetta) and Ravel(antonetta, redford) -> Catapult(x, antonetta))\nforall x (Anguine(x) and Pervious(x) -> not Ravel(x, antonetta))\nforall x (Catapult(x, antonetta) -> Biomedical(antonetta))\nAxillary(antonetta) and Inhibit(antonetta, redford) -> not Xxviii(antonetta)\nforall x (Ravel(x, redford) and not Ravel(redford, antonetta) -> Catapult(redford, antonetta))\nforall x (Biomedical(x) -> Inhibit(x, redford))\n\nPervious(redford)\n\ntherefore not Pervious(redford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The melodee interlard the enoch. The melodee is not jumbled. The melodee is animistic. The melodee is not prototypal. The melodee is voluble. The melodee is hairlike. The melodee abscise the enoch. The melodee unnerve the enoch. The enoch is prototypal. The enoch is voluble. The enoch abscise the melodee. The enoch unnerve the melodee. If something unnerve the enoch and the enoch unnerve the melodee then it abscise the enoch. If something is prototypal and jumbled then it does not need the enoch. If something abscise the enoch then the enoch is hairlike. If the enoch is voluble and the enoch interlard the melodee then the enoch is not animistic. If something unnerve the melodee and the melodee does not need the enoch then the melodee abscise the enoch. If something is hairlike then it interlard the melodee. The melodee interlard the melodee.", "logic": "\nInterlard(melodee, enoch)\nnot Jumbled(melodee)\nAnimistic(melodee)\nnot Prototypal(melodee)\nVoluble(melodee)\nHairlike(melodee)\nAbscise(melodee, enoch)\nUnnerve(melodee, enoch)\nPrototypal(enoch)\nVoluble(enoch)\nAbscise(enoch, melodee)\nUnnerve(enoch, melodee)\nforall x (Unnerve(x, enoch) and Unnerve(enoch, melodee) -> Abscise(x, enoch))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) and Jumbled(x) -> not Unnerve(x, enoch))\nforall x (Abscise(x, enoch) -> Hairlike(enoch))\nVoluble(enoch) and Interlard(enoch, melodee) -> not Animistic(enoch)\nforall x (Unnerve(x, melodee) and not Unnerve(melodee, enoch) -> Abscise(melodee, enoch))\nforall x (Hairlike(x) -> Interlard(x, melodee))\n\nInterlard(melodee, melodee)\n\nHairlike(melodee) and forall x (Hairlike(x) -> Interlard(x, melodee)) -> therefore Interlard(melodee, melodee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The margie zoom the lynna. The margie is not lucifugous. The margie is paschal. The margie is not bogus. The margie is deadened. The margie is daring. The margie propel the lynna. The margie enamour the lynna. The lynna is bogus. The lynna is deadened. The lynna propel the margie. The lynna enamour the margie. If something enamour the lynna and the lynna enamour the margie then it propel the lynna. If something is bogus and lucifugous then it does not need the lynna. If something propel the lynna then the lynna is daring. If the lynna is deadened and the lynna zoom the margie then the lynna is not paschal. If something enamour the margie and the margie does not need the lynna then the margie propel the lynna. If something is daring then it zoom the margie. The margie does not chase the margie.", "logic": "\nZoom(margie, lynna)\nnot Lucifugous(margie)\nPaschal(margie)\nnot Bogus(margie)\nDeadened(margie)\nDaring(margie)\nPropel(margie, lynna)\nEnamour(margie, lynna)\nBogus(lynna)\nDeadened(lynna)\nPropel(lynna, margie)\nEnamour(lynna, margie)\nforall x (Enamour(x, lynna) and Enamour(lynna, margie) -> Propel(x, lynna))\nforall x (Bogus(x) and Lucifugous(x) -> not Enamour(x, lynna))\nforall x (Propel(x, lynna) -> Daring(lynna))\nDeadened(lynna) and Zoom(lynna, margie) -> not Paschal(lynna)\nforall x (Enamour(x, margie) and not Enamour(margie, lynna) -> Propel(margie, lynna))\nforall x (Daring(x) -> Zoom(x, margie))\n\nnot Zoom(margie, margie)\n\nDaring(margie) and forall x (Daring(x) -> Zoom(x, margie)) -> therefore Zoom(margie, margie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The janis colly the bellina. The janis is not creative. The janis is prosthetic. The janis is not finnish. The janis is tetragonal. The janis is sourish. The janis sulfate the bellina. The janis claret the bellina. The bellina is finnish. The bellina is tetragonal. The bellina sulfate the janis. The bellina claret the janis. If something claret the bellina and the bellina claret the janis then it sulfate the bellina. If something is finnish and creative then it does not need the bellina. If something sulfate the bellina then the bellina is sourish. If the bellina is tetragonal and the bellina colly the janis then the bellina is not prosthetic. If something claret the janis and the janis does not need the bellina then the janis sulfate the bellina. If something is sourish then it colly the janis. The bellina colly the janis.", "logic": "\nColly(janis, bellina)\nnot Creative(janis)\nProsthetic(janis)\nnot Finnish(janis)\nTetragonal(janis)\nSourish(janis)\nSulfate(janis, bellina)\nClaret(janis, bellina)\nFinnish(bellina)\nTetragonal(bellina)\nSulfate(bellina, janis)\nClaret(bellina, janis)\nforall x (Claret(x, bellina) and Claret(bellina, janis) -> Sulfate(x, bellina))\nforall x (Finnish(x) and Creative(x) -> not Claret(x, bellina))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, bellina) -> Sourish(bellina))\nTetragonal(bellina) and Colly(bellina, janis) -> not Prosthetic(bellina)\nforall x (Claret(x, janis) and not Claret(janis, bellina) -> Sulfate(janis, bellina))\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Colly(x, janis))\n\nColly(bellina, janis)\n\nSulfate(janis, bellina) and forall x (Sulfate(x, bellina) -> Sourish(bellina)) -> therefore Sourish(bellina) Sourish(bellina) and forall x (Sourish(x) -> Colly(x, janis)) -> therefore Colly(bellina, janis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The randene dilute the deloris. The randene is not aghast. The randene is reportable. The randene is not ototoxic. The randene is vegetal. The randene is abstemious. The randene disperse the deloris. The randene backfire the deloris. The deloris is ototoxic. The deloris is vegetal. The deloris disperse the randene. The deloris backfire the randene. If something backfire the deloris and the deloris backfire the randene then it disperse the deloris. If something is ototoxic and aghast then it does not need the deloris. If something disperse the deloris then the deloris is abstemious. If the deloris is vegetal and the deloris dilute the randene then the deloris is not reportable. If something backfire the randene and the randene does not need the deloris then the randene disperse the deloris. If something is abstemious then it dilute the randene. The deloris does not chase the randene.", "logic": "\nDilute(randene, deloris)\nnot Aghast(randene)\nReportable(randene)\nnot Ototoxic(randene)\nVegetal(randene)\nAbstemious(randene)\nDisperse(randene, deloris)\nBackfire(randene, deloris)\nOtotoxic(deloris)\nVegetal(deloris)\nDisperse(deloris, randene)\nBackfire(deloris, randene)\nforall x (Backfire(x, deloris) and Backfire(deloris, randene) -> Disperse(x, deloris))\nforall x (Ototoxic(x) and Aghast(x) -> not Backfire(x, deloris))\nforall x (Disperse(x, deloris) -> Abstemious(deloris))\nVegetal(deloris) and Dilute(deloris, randene) -> not Reportable(deloris)\nforall x (Backfire(x, randene) and not Backfire(randene, deloris) -> Disperse(randene, deloris))\nforall x (Abstemious(x) -> Dilute(x, randene))\n\nnot Dilute(deloris, randene)\n\nDisperse(randene, deloris) and forall x (Disperse(x, deloris) -> Abstemious(deloris)) -> therefore Abstemious(deloris) Abstemious(deloris) and forall x (Abstemious(x) -> Dilute(x, randene)) -> therefore Dilute(deloris, randene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The wittie eyeball the pet. The wittie is not tamed. The wittie is worried. The wittie is not permeating. The wittie is fourteen. The wittie is chian. The wittie melodize the pet. The wittie ptyalise the pet. The pet is permeating. The pet is fourteen. The pet melodize the wittie. The pet ptyalise the wittie. If something ptyalise the pet and the pet ptyalise the wittie then it melodize the pet. If something is permeating and tamed then it does not need the pet. If something melodize the pet then the pet is chian. If the pet is fourteen and the pet eyeball the wittie then the pet is not worried. If something ptyalise the wittie and the wittie does not need the pet then the wittie melodize the pet. If something is chian then it eyeball the wittie. The pet is not worried.", "logic": "\nEyeball(wittie, pet)\nnot Tamed(wittie)\nWorried(wittie)\nnot Permeating(wittie)\nFourteen(wittie)\nChian(wittie)\nMelodize(wittie, pet)\nPtyalise(wittie, pet)\nPermeating(pet)\nFourteen(pet)\nMelodize(pet, wittie)\nPtyalise(pet, wittie)\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, pet) and Ptyalise(pet, wittie) -> Melodize(x, pet))\nforall x (Permeating(x) and Tamed(x) -> not Ptyalise(x, pet))\nforall x (Melodize(x, pet) -> Chian(pet))\nFourteen(pet) and Eyeball(pet, wittie) -> not Worried(pet)\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, wittie) and not Ptyalise(wittie, pet) -> Melodize(wittie, pet))\nforall x (Chian(x) -> Eyeball(x, wittie))\n\nnot Worried(pet)\n\nMelodize(wittie, pet) and forall x (Melodize(x, pet) -> Chian(pet)) -> therefore Chian(pet) Chian(pet) and forall x (Chian(x) -> Eyeball(x, wittie)) -> therefore Eyeball(pet, wittie) Fourteen(pet) and Eyeball(pet, wittie) and Fourteen(pet) and Eyeball(pet, wittie) -> not Worried(pet) -> therefore not Worried(pet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The bernadine pertain the lurleen. The bernadine is not total. The bernadine is hungarian. The bernadine is not fabricated. The bernadine is seamed. The bernadine is outbred. The bernadine demoralize the lurleen. The bernadine racketeer the lurleen. The lurleen is fabricated. The lurleen is seamed. The lurleen demoralize the bernadine. The lurleen racketeer the bernadine. If something racketeer the lurleen and the lurleen racketeer the bernadine then it demoralize the lurleen. If something is fabricated and total then it does not need the lurleen. If something demoralize the lurleen then the lurleen is outbred. If the lurleen is seamed and the lurleen pertain the bernadine then the lurleen is not hungarian. If something racketeer the bernadine and the bernadine does not need the lurleen then the bernadine demoralize the lurleen. If something is outbred then it pertain the bernadine. The lurleen is hungarian.", "logic": "\nPertain(bernadine, lurleen)\nnot Total(bernadine)\nHungarian(bernadine)\nnot Fabricated(bernadine)\nSeamed(bernadine)\nOutbred(bernadine)\nDemoralize(bernadine, lurleen)\nRacketeer(bernadine, lurleen)\nFabricated(lurleen)\nSeamed(lurleen)\nDemoralize(lurleen, bernadine)\nRacketeer(lurleen, bernadine)\nforall x (Racketeer(x, lurleen) and Racketeer(lurleen, bernadine) -> Demoralize(x, lurleen))\nforall x (Fabricated(x) and Total(x) -> not Racketeer(x, lurleen))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, lurleen) -> Outbred(lurleen))\nSeamed(lurleen) and Pertain(lurleen, bernadine) -> not Hungarian(lurleen)\nforall x (Racketeer(x, bernadine) and not Racketeer(bernadine, lurleen) -> Demoralize(bernadine, lurleen))\nforall x (Outbred(x) -> Pertain(x, bernadine))\n\nHungarian(lurleen)\n\nDemoralize(bernadine, lurleen) and forall x (Demoralize(x, lurleen) -> Outbred(lurleen)) -> therefore Outbred(lurleen) Outbred(lurleen) and forall x (Outbred(x) -> Pertain(x, bernadine)) -> therefore Pertain(lurleen, bernadine) Seamed(lurleen) and Pertain(lurleen, bernadine) and Seamed(lurleen) and Pertain(lurleen, bernadine) -> not Hungarian(lurleen) -> therefore not Hungarian(lurleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The goldina ravage the tammy. The goldina is not enormous. The goldina is mauve. The goldina is not duteous. The goldina is free. The goldina is disastrous. The goldina obturate the tammy. The goldina playact the tammy. The tammy is duteous. The tammy is free. The tammy obturate the goldina. The tammy playact the goldina. If something playact the tammy and the tammy playact the goldina then it obturate the tammy. If something is duteous and enormous then it does not need the tammy. If something obturate the tammy then the tammy is disastrous. If the tammy is free and the tammy ravage the goldina then the tammy is not mauve. If something playact the goldina and the goldina does not need the tammy then the goldina obturate the tammy. If something is disastrous then it ravage the goldina. The tammy does not like the tammy.", "logic": "\nRavage(goldina, tammy)\nnot Enormous(goldina)\nMauve(goldina)\nnot Duteous(goldina)\nFree(goldina)\nDisastrous(goldina)\nObturate(goldina, tammy)\nPlayact(goldina, tammy)\nDuteous(tammy)\nFree(tammy)\nObturate(tammy, goldina)\nPlayact(tammy, goldina)\nforall x (Playact(x, tammy) and Playact(tammy, goldina) -> Obturate(x, tammy))\nforall x (Duteous(x) and Enormous(x) -> not Playact(x, tammy))\nforall x (Obturate(x, tammy) -> Disastrous(tammy))\nFree(tammy) and Ravage(tammy, goldina) -> not Mauve(tammy)\nforall x (Playact(x, goldina) and not Playact(goldina, tammy) -> Obturate(goldina, tammy))\nforall x (Disastrous(x) -> Ravage(x, goldina))\n\nnot Obturate(tammy, tammy)\n\nforall x (Playact(x, tammy) and Playact(tammy, goldina) -> Obturate(x, tammy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The lyssa ennoble the lewis. The lyssa is not operative. The lyssa is abaxial. The lyssa is not endurable. The lyssa is audible. The lyssa is sufficient. The lyssa bloviate the lewis. The lyssa helm the lewis. The lewis is endurable. The lewis is audible. The lewis bloviate the lyssa. The lewis helm the lyssa. If something helm the lewis and the lewis helm the lyssa then it bloviate the lewis. If something is endurable and operative then it does not need the lewis. If something bloviate the lewis then the lewis is sufficient. If the lewis is audible and the lewis ennoble the lyssa then the lewis is not abaxial. If something helm the lyssa and the lyssa does not need the lewis then the lyssa bloviate the lewis. If something is sufficient then it ennoble the lyssa. The lewis helm the lewis.", "logic": "\nEnnoble(lyssa, lewis)\nnot Operative(lyssa)\nAbaxial(lyssa)\nnot Endurable(lyssa)\nAudible(lyssa)\nSufficient(lyssa)\nBloviate(lyssa, lewis)\nHelm(lyssa, lewis)\nEndurable(lewis)\nAudible(lewis)\nBloviate(lewis, lyssa)\nHelm(lewis, lyssa)\nforall x (Helm(x, lewis) and Helm(lewis, lyssa) -> Bloviate(x, lewis))\nforall x (Endurable(x) and Operative(x) -> not Helm(x, lewis))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, lewis) -> Sufficient(lewis))\nAudible(lewis) and Ennoble(lewis, lyssa) -> not Abaxial(lewis)\nforall x (Helm(x, lyssa) and not Helm(lyssa, lewis) -> Bloviate(lyssa, lewis))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) -> Ennoble(x, lyssa))\n\nHelm(lewis, lewis)\n\nHelm(lewis, lewis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The marcello choir the quigly. The marcello is not timid. The marcello is palatine. The marcello is not auriform. The marcello is thai. The marcello is footed. The marcello assault the quigly. The marcello rescue the quigly. The quigly is auriform. The quigly is thai. The quigly assault the marcello. The quigly rescue the marcello. If something rescue the quigly and the quigly rescue the marcello then it assault the quigly. If something is auriform and timid then it does not need the quigly. If something assault the quigly then the quigly is footed. If the quigly is thai and the quigly choir the marcello then the quigly is not palatine. If something rescue the marcello and the marcello does not need the quigly then the marcello assault the quigly. If something is footed then it choir the marcello. The quigly does not chase the quigly.", "logic": "\nChoir(marcello, quigly)\nnot Timid(marcello)\nPalatine(marcello)\nnot Auriform(marcello)\nThai(marcello)\nFooted(marcello)\nAssault(marcello, quigly)\nRescue(marcello, quigly)\nAuriform(quigly)\nThai(quigly)\nAssault(quigly, marcello)\nRescue(quigly, marcello)\nforall x (Rescue(x, quigly) and Rescue(quigly, marcello) -> Assault(x, quigly))\nforall x (Auriform(x) and Timid(x) -> not Rescue(x, quigly))\nforall x (Assault(x, quigly) -> Footed(quigly))\nThai(quigly) and Choir(quigly, marcello) -> not Palatine(quigly)\nforall x (Rescue(x, marcello) and not Rescue(marcello, quigly) -> Assault(marcello, quigly))\nforall x (Footed(x) -> Choir(x, marcello))\n\nnot Choir(quigly, quigly)\n\nnot Choir(quigly, quigly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The bertram invalid the dorcas. The bertram is not decussate. The bertram is scientific. The bertram is not soaring. The bertram is canicular. The bertram is bolshevik. The bertram shaft the dorcas. The bertram yacht the dorcas. The dorcas is soaring. The dorcas is canicular. The dorcas shaft the bertram. The dorcas yacht the bertram. If something yacht the dorcas and the dorcas yacht the bertram then it shaft the dorcas. If something is soaring and decussate then it does not need the dorcas. If something shaft the dorcas then the dorcas is bolshevik. If the dorcas is canicular and the dorcas invalid the bertram then the dorcas is not scientific. If something yacht the bertram and the bertram does not need the dorcas then the bertram shaft the dorcas. If something is bolshevik then it invalid the bertram. The bertram yacht the bertram.", "logic": "\nInvalid(bertram, dorcas)\nnot Decussate(bertram)\nScientific(bertram)\nnot Soaring(bertram)\nCanicular(bertram)\nBolshevik(bertram)\nShaft(bertram, dorcas)\nYacht(bertram, dorcas)\nSoaring(dorcas)\nCanicular(dorcas)\nShaft(dorcas, bertram)\nYacht(dorcas, bertram)\nforall x (Yacht(x, dorcas) and Yacht(dorcas, bertram) -> Shaft(x, dorcas))\nforall x (Soaring(x) and Decussate(x) -> not Yacht(x, dorcas))\nforall x (Shaft(x, dorcas) -> Bolshevik(dorcas))\nCanicular(dorcas) and Invalid(dorcas, bertram) -> not Scientific(dorcas)\nforall x (Yacht(x, bertram) and not Yacht(bertram, dorcas) -> Shaft(bertram, dorcas))\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) -> Invalid(x, bertram))\n\nYacht(bertram, bertram)\n\nYacht(bertram, bertram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The cindi bunt the finley. The cindi is not arachnoid. The cindi is mouthless. The cindi is not vatic. The cindi is incarnate. The cindi is irritative. The cindi fritter the finley. The cindi geyser the finley. The finley is vatic. The finley is incarnate. The finley fritter the cindi. The finley geyser the cindi. If something geyser the finley and the finley geyser the cindi then it fritter the finley. If something is vatic and arachnoid then it does not need the finley. If something fritter the finley then the finley is irritative. If the finley is incarnate and the finley bunt the cindi then the finley is not mouthless. If something geyser the cindi and the cindi does not need the finley then the cindi fritter the finley. If something is irritative then it bunt the cindi. The finley is not arachnoid.", "logic": "\nBunt(cindi, finley)\nnot Arachnoid(cindi)\nMouthless(cindi)\nnot Vatic(cindi)\nIncarnate(cindi)\nIrritative(cindi)\nFritter(cindi, finley)\nGeyser(cindi, finley)\nVatic(finley)\nIncarnate(finley)\nFritter(finley, cindi)\nGeyser(finley, cindi)\nforall x (Geyser(x, finley) and Geyser(finley, cindi) -> Fritter(x, finley))\nforall x (Vatic(x) and Arachnoid(x) -> not Geyser(x, finley))\nforall x (Fritter(x, finley) -> Irritative(finley))\nIncarnate(finley) and Bunt(finley, cindi) -> not Mouthless(finley)\nforall x (Geyser(x, cindi) and not Geyser(cindi, finley) -> Fritter(cindi, finley))\nforall x (Irritative(x) -> Bunt(x, cindi))\n\nnot Arachnoid(finley)\n\nnot Arachnoid(finley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The cynthie confound the kathleen. The cynthie is not curdled. The cynthie is oxidised. The cynthie is not ammoniated. The cynthie is quondam. The cynthie is astrocytic. The cynthie cure the kathleen. The cynthie evaluate the kathleen. The kathleen is ammoniated. The kathleen is quondam. The kathleen cure the cynthie. The kathleen evaluate the cynthie. If something evaluate the kathleen and the kathleen evaluate the cynthie then it cure the kathleen. If something is ammoniated and curdled then it does not need the kathleen. If something cure the kathleen then the kathleen is astrocytic. If the kathleen is quondam and the kathleen confound the cynthie then the kathleen is not oxidised. If something evaluate the cynthie and the cynthie does not need the kathleen then the cynthie cure the kathleen. If something is astrocytic then it confound the cynthie. The cynthie cure the cynthie.", "logic": "\nConfound(cynthie, kathleen)\nnot Curdled(cynthie)\nOxidised(cynthie)\nnot Ammoniated(cynthie)\nQuondam(cynthie)\nAstrocytic(cynthie)\nCure(cynthie, kathleen)\nEvaluate(cynthie, kathleen)\nAmmoniated(kathleen)\nQuondam(kathleen)\nCure(kathleen, cynthie)\nEvaluate(kathleen, cynthie)\nforall x (Evaluate(x, kathleen) and Evaluate(kathleen, cynthie) -> Cure(x, kathleen))\nforall x (Ammoniated(x) and Curdled(x) -> not Evaluate(x, kathleen))\nforall x (Cure(x, kathleen) -> Astrocytic(kathleen))\nQuondam(kathleen) and Confound(kathleen, cynthie) -> not Oxidised(kathleen)\nforall x (Evaluate(x, cynthie) and not Evaluate(cynthie, kathleen) -> Cure(cynthie, kathleen))\nforall x (Astrocytic(x) -> Confound(x, cynthie))\n\nCure(cynthie, cynthie)\n\nCure(cynthie, cynthie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The mora is untidy. The mora is corking. The mora blither the klee. The klee background the mora. The klee parse the mora. The klee is beardless. The klee blither the mora. If someone is corking then they do not chase the klee. If someone is corking and they do not chase the klee then they chase the mora. If someone blither the klee and they chase the mora then they do not eat the klee. The mora is corking.", "logic": "\nUntidy(mora)\nCorking(mora)\nBlither(mora, klee)\nBackground(klee, mora)\nParse(klee, mora)\nBeardless(klee)\nBlither(klee, mora)\nforall x (Corking(x) -> not Background(x, klee))\nforall x (Corking(x) and not Background(x, klee) -> Background(x, mora))\nforall x (Blither(x, klee) and Background(x, mora) -> not Parse(x, klee))\n\nCorking(mora)\n\ntherefore Corking(mora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The channa is cornish. The channa is dutiful. The channa retrovert the pearle. The pearle caddy the channa. The pearle outgo the channa. The pearle is unmixable. The pearle retrovert the channa. If someone is dutiful then they do not chase the pearle. If someone is dutiful and they do not chase the pearle then they chase the channa. If someone retrovert the pearle and they chase the channa then they do not eat the pearle. The pearle is not unmixable.", "logic": "\nCornish(channa)\nDutiful(channa)\nRetrovert(channa, pearle)\nCaddy(pearle, channa)\nOutgo(pearle, channa)\nUnmixable(pearle)\nRetrovert(pearle, channa)\nforall x (Dutiful(x) -> not Caddy(x, pearle))\nforall x (Dutiful(x) and not Caddy(x, pearle) -> Caddy(x, channa))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, pearle) and Caddy(x, channa) -> not Outgo(x, pearle))\n\nnot Unmixable(pearle)\n\ntherefore Unmixable(pearle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The peggy is deist. The peggy is gainly. The peggy descant the cherise. The cherise verbify the peggy. The cherise pester the peggy. The cherise is schismatic. The cherise descant the peggy. If someone is gainly then they do not chase the cherise. If someone is gainly and they do not chase the cherise then they chase the peggy. If someone descant the cherise and they chase the peggy then they do not eat the cherise. The peggy does not chase the cherise.", "logic": "\nDeist(peggy)\nGainly(peggy)\nDescant(peggy, cherise)\nVerbify(cherise, peggy)\nPester(cherise, peggy)\nSchismatic(cherise)\nDescant(cherise, peggy)\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> not Verbify(x, cherise))\nforall x (Gainly(x) and not Verbify(x, cherise) -> Verbify(x, peggy))\nforall x (Descant(x, cherise) and Verbify(x, peggy) -> not Pester(x, cherise))\n\nnot Verbify(peggy, cherise)\n\nGainly(peggy) and forall x (Gainly(x) -> not Verbify(x, cherise)) -> therefore not Verbify(peggy, cherise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The phillida is minded. The phillida is thievish. The phillida programme the darya. The darya roam the phillida. The darya beleaguer the phillida. The darya is irascible. The darya programme the phillida. If someone is thievish then they do not chase the darya. If someone is thievish and they do not chase the darya then they chase the phillida. If someone programme the darya and they chase the phillida then they do not eat the darya. The phillida roam the darya.", "logic": "\nMinded(phillida)\nThievish(phillida)\nProgramme(phillida, darya)\nRoam(darya, phillida)\nBeleaguer(darya, phillida)\nIrascible(darya)\nProgramme(darya, phillida)\nforall x (Thievish(x) -> not Roam(x, darya))\nforall x (Thievish(x) and not Roam(x, darya) -> Roam(x, phillida))\nforall x (Programme(x, darya) and Roam(x, phillida) -> not Beleaguer(x, darya))\n\nRoam(phillida, darya)\n\nThievish(phillida) and forall x (Thievish(x) -> not Roam(x, darya)) -> therefore not Roam(phillida, darya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The erica is uncaulked. The erica is effortful. The erica follow the dedie. The dedie terminate the erica. The dedie clout the erica. The dedie is endogamous. The dedie follow the erica. If someone is effortful then they do not chase the dedie. If someone is effortful and they do not chase the dedie then they chase the erica. If someone follow the dedie and they chase the erica then they do not eat the dedie. The erica terminate the erica.", "logic": "\nUncaulked(erica)\nEffortful(erica)\nFollow(erica, dedie)\nTerminate(dedie, erica)\nClout(dedie, erica)\nEndogamous(dedie)\nFollow(dedie, erica)\nforall x (Effortful(x) -> not Terminate(x, dedie))\nforall x (Effortful(x) and not Terminate(x, dedie) -> Terminate(x, erica))\nforall x (Follow(x, dedie) and Terminate(x, erica) -> not Clout(x, dedie))\n\nTerminate(erica, erica)\n\nEffortful(erica) and forall x (Effortful(x) -> not Terminate(x, dedie)) -> therefore not Terminate(erica, dedie) Effortful(erica) and not Terminate(erica, dedie) and forall x (Effortful(x) and not Terminate(x, dedie) -> Terminate(x, erica)) -> therefore Terminate(erica, erica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The pauline is asteroid. The pauline is utility. The pauline revise the elna. The elna slew the pauline. The elna wharf the pauline. The elna is silklike. The elna revise the pauline. If someone is utility then they do not chase the elna. If someone is utility and they do not chase the elna then they chase the pauline. If someone revise the elna and they chase the pauline then they do not eat the elna. The pauline does not chase the pauline.", "logic": "\nAsteroid(pauline)\nUtility(pauline)\nRevise(pauline, elna)\nSlew(elna, pauline)\nWharf(elna, pauline)\nSilklike(elna)\nRevise(elna, pauline)\nforall x (Utility(x) -> not Slew(x, elna))\nforall x (Utility(x) and not Slew(x, elna) -> Slew(x, pauline))\nforall x (Revise(x, elna) and Slew(x, pauline) -> not Wharf(x, elna))\n\nnot Slew(pauline, pauline)\n\nUtility(pauline) and forall x (Utility(x) -> not Slew(x, elna)) -> therefore not Slew(pauline, elna) Utility(pauline) and not Slew(pauline, elna) and forall x (Utility(x) and not Slew(x, elna) -> Slew(x, pauline)) -> therefore Slew(pauline, pauline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The lucio is scapose. The lucio is ripened. The lucio clarion the mavra. The mavra starch the lucio. The mavra slabber the lucio. The mavra is crural. The mavra clarion the lucio. If someone is ripened then they do not chase the mavra. If someone is ripened and they do not chase the mavra then they chase the lucio. If someone clarion the mavra and they chase the lucio then they do not eat the mavra. The lucio does not eat the mavra.", "logic": "\nScapose(lucio)\nRipened(lucio)\nClarion(lucio, mavra)\nStarch(mavra, lucio)\nSlabber(mavra, lucio)\nCrural(mavra)\nClarion(mavra, lucio)\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> not Starch(x, mavra))\nforall x (Ripened(x) and not Starch(x, mavra) -> Starch(x, lucio))\nforall x (Clarion(x, mavra) and Starch(x, lucio) -> not Slabber(x, mavra))\n\nnot Slabber(lucio, mavra)\n\nRipened(lucio) and forall x (Ripened(x) -> not Starch(x, mavra)) -> therefore not Starch(lucio, mavra) Ripened(lucio) and not Starch(lucio, mavra) and forall x (Ripened(x) and not Starch(x, mavra) -> Starch(x, lucio)) -> therefore Starch(lucio, lucio) Clarion(lucio, mavra) and Starch(lucio, lucio) and forall x (Clarion(x, mavra) and Starch(x, lucio) -> not Slabber(x, mavra)) -> therefore not Slabber(lucio, mavra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The biddy is agleam. The biddy is climatic. The biddy clap the caryl. The caryl flour the biddy. The caryl jell the biddy. The caryl is bragging. The caryl clap the biddy. If someone is climatic then they do not chase the caryl. If someone is climatic and they do not chase the caryl then they chase the biddy. If someone clap the caryl and they chase the biddy then they do not eat the caryl. The biddy jell the caryl.", "logic": "\nAgleam(biddy)\nClimatic(biddy)\nClap(biddy, caryl)\nFlour(caryl, biddy)\nJell(caryl, biddy)\nBragging(caryl)\nClap(caryl, biddy)\nforall x (Climatic(x) -> not Flour(x, caryl))\nforall x (Climatic(x) and not Flour(x, caryl) -> Flour(x, biddy))\nforall x (Clap(x, caryl) and Flour(x, biddy) -> not Jell(x, caryl))\n\nJell(biddy, caryl)\n\nClimatic(biddy) and forall x (Climatic(x) -> not Flour(x, caryl)) -> therefore not Flour(biddy, caryl) Climatic(biddy) and not Flour(biddy, caryl) and forall x (Climatic(x) and not Flour(x, caryl) -> Flour(x, biddy)) -> therefore Flour(biddy, biddy) Clap(biddy, caryl) and Flour(biddy, biddy) and forall x (Clap(x, caryl) and Flour(x, biddy) -> not Jell(x, caryl)) -> therefore not Jell(biddy, caryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The alethea is vestmented. The alethea is ungreased. The alethea combine the reina. The reina discourse the alethea. The reina cannonade the alethea. The reina is popish. The reina combine the alethea. If someone is ungreased then they do not chase the reina. If someone is ungreased and they do not chase the reina then they chase the alethea. If someone combine the reina and they chase the alethea then they do not eat the reina. The alethea does not need the alethea.", "logic": "\nVestmented(alethea)\nUngreased(alethea)\nCombine(alethea, reina)\nDiscourse(reina, alethea)\nCannonade(reina, alethea)\nPopish(reina)\nCombine(reina, alethea)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> not Discourse(x, reina))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and not Discourse(x, reina) -> Discourse(x, alethea))\nforall x (Combine(x, reina) and Discourse(x, alethea) -> not Cannonade(x, reina))\n\nnot Combine(alethea, alethea)\n\nnot Combine(alethea, alethea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The angil is indicative. The angil is delusory. The angil portend the kaster. The kaster flick the angil. The kaster befall the angil. The kaster is muciferous. The kaster portend the angil. If someone is delusory then they do not chase the kaster. If someone is delusory and they do not chase the kaster then they chase the angil. If someone portend the kaster and they chase the angil then they do not eat the kaster. The angil is rough.", "logic": "\nIndicative(angil)\nDelusory(angil)\nPortend(angil, kaster)\nFlick(kaster, angil)\nBefall(kaster, angil)\nMuciferous(kaster)\nPortend(kaster, angil)\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> not Flick(x, kaster))\nforall x (Delusory(x) and not Flick(x, kaster) -> Flick(x, angil))\nforall x (Portend(x, kaster) and Flick(x, angil) -> not Befall(x, kaster))\n\nRough(angil)\n\nRough(angil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The neila is eroded. The neila is toxicant. The neila soar the sid. The sid adumbrate the neila. The sid orbit the neila. The sid is accessory. The sid soar the neila. If someone is toxicant then they do not chase the sid. If someone is toxicant and they do not chase the sid then they chase the neila. If someone soar the sid and they chase the neila then they do not eat the sid. The sid is not blue.", "logic": "\nEroded(neila)\nToxicant(neila)\nSoar(neila, sid)\nAdumbrate(sid, neila)\nOrbit(sid, neila)\nAccessory(sid)\nSoar(sid, neila)\nforall x (Toxicant(x) -> not Adumbrate(x, sid))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) and not Adumbrate(x, sid) -> Adumbrate(x, neila))\nforall x (Soar(x, sid) and Adumbrate(x, neila) -> not Orbit(x, sid))\n\nnot Blue(sid)\n\nnot Blue(sid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The claudelle is downward. The claudelle is condylar. The claudelle offer the alston. The alston fancy the claudelle. The alston decelerate the claudelle. The alston is thick. The alston offer the claudelle. If someone is condylar then they do not chase the alston. If someone is condylar and they do not chase the alston then they chase the claudelle. If someone offer the alston and they chase the claudelle then they do not eat the alston. The alston decelerate the alston.", "logic": "\nDownward(claudelle)\nCondylar(claudelle)\nOffer(claudelle, alston)\nFancy(alston, claudelle)\nDecelerate(alston, claudelle)\nThick(alston)\nOffer(alston, claudelle)\nforall x (Condylar(x) -> not Fancy(x, alston))\nforall x (Condylar(x) and not Fancy(x, alston) -> Fancy(x, claudelle))\nforall x (Offer(x, alston) and Fancy(x, claudelle) -> not Decelerate(x, alston))\n\nDecelerate(alston, alston)\n\nDecelerate(alston, alston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The helaina is japanese. The helaina is anile. The helaina entrance the consuela. The consuela slag the helaina. The consuela review the helaina. The consuela is informed. The consuela entrance the helaina. If someone is anile then they do not chase the consuela. If someone is anile and they do not chase the consuela then they chase the helaina. If someone entrance the consuela and they chase the helaina then they do not eat the consuela. The consuela is not anile.", "logic": "\nJapanese(helaina)\nAnile(helaina)\nEntrance(helaina, consuela)\nSlag(consuela, helaina)\nReview(consuela, helaina)\nInformed(consuela)\nEntrance(consuela, helaina)\nforall x (Anile(x) -> not Slag(x, consuela))\nforall x (Anile(x) and not Slag(x, consuela) -> Slag(x, helaina))\nforall x (Entrance(x, consuela) and Slag(x, helaina) -> not Review(x, consuela))\n\nnot Anile(consuela)\n\nnot Anile(consuela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The modestia is coiled. The modestia is statewide. The modestia bulletin the waverley. The waverley snitch the modestia. The waverley prize the modestia. The waverley is bullish. The waverley bulletin the modestia. If someone is statewide then they do not chase the waverley. If someone is statewide and they do not chase the waverley then they chase the modestia. If someone bulletin the waverley and they chase the modestia then they do not eat the waverley. The modestia is blue.", "logic": "\nCoiled(modestia)\nStatewide(modestia)\nBulletin(modestia, waverley)\nSnitch(waverley, modestia)\nPrize(waverley, modestia)\nBullish(waverley)\nBulletin(waverley, modestia)\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> not Snitch(x, waverley))\nforall x (Statewide(x) and not Snitch(x, waverley) -> Snitch(x, modestia))\nforall x (Bulletin(x, waverley) and Snitch(x, modestia) -> not Prize(x, waverley))\n\nBlue(modestia)\n\nBlue(modestia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The ely is regular. The ely is pessimal. The ely delouse the catlee. The catlee languish the ely. The catlee interlard the ely. The catlee is acerate. The catlee delouse the ely. If someone is pessimal then they do not chase the catlee. If someone is pessimal and they do not chase the catlee then they chase the ely. If someone delouse the catlee and they chase the ely then they do not eat the catlee. The ely does not eat the ely.", "logic": "\nRegular(ely)\nPessimal(ely)\nDelouse(ely, catlee)\nLanguish(catlee, ely)\nInterlard(catlee, ely)\nAcerate(catlee)\nDelouse(catlee, ely)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> not Languish(x, catlee))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and not Languish(x, catlee) -> Languish(x, ely))\nforall x (Delouse(x, catlee) and Languish(x, ely) -> not Interlard(x, catlee))\n\nnot Interlard(ely, ely)\n\nnot Interlard(ely, ely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The wren is liquid. The wren is elderly. The wren communise the mandi. The mandi calm the wren. The mandi predecease the wren. The mandi is pensive. The mandi communise the wren. If someone is elderly then they do not chase the mandi. If someone is elderly and they do not chase the mandi then they chase the wren. If someone communise the mandi and they chase the wren then they do not eat the mandi. The wren is pensive.", "logic": "\nLiquid(wren)\nElderly(wren)\nCommunise(wren, mandi)\nCalm(mandi, wren)\nPredecease(mandi, wren)\nPensive(mandi)\nCommunise(mandi, wren)\nforall x (Elderly(x) -> not Calm(x, mandi))\nforall x (Elderly(x) and not Calm(x, mandi) -> Calm(x, wren))\nforall x (Communise(x, mandi) and Calm(x, wren) -> not Predecease(x, mandi))\n\nPensive(wren)\n\nPensive(wren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "Vanna is not negro. Vanna is avenged. Vanna is vulturine. Vanna is elemental. Viola is not negro. Viola is avenged. Viola is vulturine. Cold, moldable things are unabridged. If Viola is vulturine and Viola is elemental then Viola is unabridged. If something is incorrect then it is elemental. Nice things are elemental. If something is incorrect and not moldable then it is not vulturine. If Viola is not negro then Viola is incorrect. Viola is vulturine.", "logic": "\nnot Negro(vanna)\nAvenged(vanna)\nVulturine(vanna)\nElemental(vanna)\nnot Negro(viola)\nAvenged(viola)\nVulturine(viola)\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and Moldable(x) -> Unabridged(x))\nVulturine(viola) and Elemental(viola) -> Unabridged(viola)\nforall x (Incorrect(x) -> Elemental(x))\nforall x (Moldable(x) -> Elemental(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and not Moldable(x) -> not Vulturine(x))\nnot Negro(viola) -> Incorrect(viola)\n\nVulturine(viola)\n\ntherefore Vulturine(viola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Billie is not punitive. Billie is captivated. Billie is beamish. Billie is ungrasped. Karola is not punitive. Karola is captivated. Karola is beamish. Cold, sequential things are spatial. If Karola is beamish and Karola is ungrasped then Karola is spatial. If something is front then it is ungrasped. Nice things are ungrasped. If something is front and not sequential then it is not beamish. If Karola is not punitive then Karola is front. Karola is not captivated.", "logic": "\nnot Punitive(billie)\nCaptivated(billie)\nBeamish(billie)\nUngrasped(billie)\nnot Punitive(karola)\nCaptivated(karola)\nBeamish(karola)\nforall x (Front(x) and Sequential(x) -> Spatial(x))\nBeamish(karola) and Ungrasped(karola) -> Spatial(karola)\nforall x (Front(x) -> Ungrasped(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Ungrasped(x))\nforall x (Front(x) and not Sequential(x) -> not Beamish(x))\nnot Punitive(karola) -> Front(karola)\n\nnot Captivated(karola)\n\ntherefore Captivated(karola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Wilton is not planned. Wilton is homing. Wilton is aneroid. Wilton is diclinous. Clarice is not planned. Clarice is homing. Clarice is aneroid. Cold, genteel things are childlike. If Clarice is aneroid and Clarice is diclinous then Clarice is childlike. If something is awol then it is diclinous. Nice things are diclinous. If something is awol and not genteel then it is not aneroid. If Clarice is not planned then Clarice is awol. Clarice is awol.", "logic": "\nnot Planned(wilton)\nHoming(wilton)\nAneroid(wilton)\nDiclinous(wilton)\nnot Planned(clarice)\nHoming(clarice)\nAneroid(clarice)\nforall x (Awol(x) and Genteel(x) -> Childlike(x))\nAneroid(clarice) and Diclinous(clarice) -> Childlike(clarice)\nforall x (Awol(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Genteel(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Awol(x) and not Genteel(x) -> not Aneroid(x))\nnot Planned(clarice) -> Awol(clarice)\n\nAwol(clarice)\n\nnot Planned(clarice) and not Planned(clarice) -> Awol(clarice) -> therefore Awol(clarice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Simone is not agrarian. Simone is germinal. Simone is blaring. Simone is unhappy. Sky is not agrarian. Sky is germinal. Sky is blaring. Cold, inglorious things are cloze. If Sky is blaring and Sky is unhappy then Sky is cloze. If something is cacodylic then it is unhappy. Nice things are unhappy. If something is cacodylic and not inglorious then it is not blaring. If Sky is not agrarian then Sky is cacodylic. Sky is not cacodylic.", "logic": "\nnot Agrarian(simone)\nGerminal(simone)\nBlaring(simone)\nUnhappy(simone)\nnot Agrarian(sky)\nGerminal(sky)\nBlaring(sky)\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and Inglorious(x) -> Cloze(x))\nBlaring(sky) and Unhappy(sky) -> Cloze(sky)\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) -> Unhappy(x))\nforall x (Inglorious(x) -> Unhappy(x))\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and not Inglorious(x) -> not Blaring(x))\nnot Agrarian(sky) -> Cacodylic(sky)\n\nnot Cacodylic(sky)\n\nnot Agrarian(sky) and not Agrarian(sky) -> Cacodylic(sky) -> therefore Cacodylic(sky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Roxi is not bifilar. Roxi is farfetched. Roxi is busty. Roxi is unreduced. Daren is not bifilar. Daren is farfetched. Daren is busty. Cold, positive things are straplike. If Daren is busty and Daren is unreduced then Daren is straplike. If something is unaffected then it is unreduced. Nice things are unreduced. If something is unaffected and not positive then it is not busty. If Daren is not bifilar then Daren is unaffected. Daren is unreduced.", "logic": "\nnot Bifilar(roxi)\nFarfetched(roxi)\nBusty(roxi)\nUnreduced(roxi)\nnot Bifilar(daren)\nFarfetched(daren)\nBusty(daren)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and Positive(x) -> Straplike(x))\nBusty(daren) and Unreduced(daren) -> Straplike(daren)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Positive(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and not Positive(x) -> not Busty(x))\nnot Bifilar(daren) -> Unaffected(daren)\n\nUnreduced(daren)\n\nnot Bifilar(daren) and not Bifilar(daren) -> Unaffected(daren) -> therefore Unaffected(daren) Unaffected(daren) and forall x (Unaffected(x) -> Unreduced(x)) -> therefore Unreduced(daren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Kassie is not victimised. Kassie is armillary. Kassie is excitable. Kassie is bowed. Chloris is not victimised. Chloris is armillary. Chloris is excitable. Cold, eased things are bullish. If Chloris is excitable and Chloris is bowed then Chloris is bullish. If something is squinty then it is bowed. Nice things are bowed. If something is squinty and not eased then it is not excitable. If Chloris is not victimised then Chloris is squinty. Chloris is not bowed.", "logic": "\nnot Victimised(kassie)\nArmillary(kassie)\nExcitable(kassie)\nBowed(kassie)\nnot Victimised(chloris)\nArmillary(chloris)\nExcitable(chloris)\nforall x (Squinty(x) and Eased(x) -> Bullish(x))\nExcitable(chloris) and Bowed(chloris) -> Bullish(chloris)\nforall x (Squinty(x) -> Bowed(x))\nforall x (Eased(x) -> Bowed(x))\nforall x (Squinty(x) and not Eased(x) -> not Excitable(x))\nnot Victimised(chloris) -> Squinty(chloris)\n\nnot Bowed(chloris)\n\nnot Victimised(chloris) and not Victimised(chloris) -> Squinty(chloris) -> therefore Squinty(chloris) Squinty(chloris) and forall x (Squinty(x) -> Bowed(x)) -> therefore Bowed(chloris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Gaynor is not bastard. Gaynor is unpointed. Gaynor is slumberous. Gaynor is fancy. Gasper is not bastard. Gasper is unpointed. Gasper is slumberous. Cold, unsweet things are caecilian. If Gasper is slumberous and Gasper is fancy then Gasper is caecilian. If something is blooded then it is fancy. Nice things are fancy. If something is blooded and not unsweet then it is not slumberous. If Gasper is not bastard then Gasper is blooded. Gasper is caecilian.", "logic": "\nnot Bastard(gaynor)\nUnpointed(gaynor)\nSlumberous(gaynor)\nFancy(gaynor)\nnot Bastard(gasper)\nUnpointed(gasper)\nSlumberous(gasper)\nforall x (Blooded(x) and Unsweet(x) -> Caecilian(x))\nSlumberous(gasper) and Fancy(gasper) -> Caecilian(gasper)\nforall x (Blooded(x) -> Fancy(x))\nforall x (Unsweet(x) -> Fancy(x))\nforall x (Blooded(x) and not Unsweet(x) -> not Slumberous(x))\nnot Bastard(gasper) -> Blooded(gasper)\n\nCaecilian(gasper)\n\nnot Bastard(gasper) and not Bastard(gasper) -> Blooded(gasper) -> therefore Blooded(gasper) Blooded(gasper) and forall x (Blooded(x) -> Fancy(x)) -> therefore Fancy(gasper) Slumberous(gasper) and Fancy(gasper) and Slumberous(gasper) and Fancy(gasper) -> Caecilian(gasper) -> therefore Caecilian(gasper)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Winnie is not consultive. Winnie is angelic. Winnie is hooklike. Winnie is unreserved. Connie is not consultive. Connie is angelic. Connie is hooklike. Cold, villainous things are exportable. If Connie is hooklike and Connie is unreserved then Connie is exportable. If something is hardfisted then it is unreserved. Nice things are unreserved. If something is hardfisted and not villainous then it is not hooklike. If Connie is not consultive then Connie is hardfisted. Connie is not exportable.", "logic": "\nnot Consultive(winnie)\nAngelic(winnie)\nHooklike(winnie)\nUnreserved(winnie)\nnot Consultive(connie)\nAngelic(connie)\nHooklike(connie)\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) and Villainous(x) -> Exportable(x))\nHooklike(connie) and Unreserved(connie) -> Exportable(connie)\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) -> Unreserved(x))\nforall x (Villainous(x) -> Unreserved(x))\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) and not Villainous(x) -> not Hooklike(x))\nnot Consultive(connie) -> Hardfisted(connie)\n\nnot Exportable(connie)\n\nnot Consultive(connie) and not Consultive(connie) -> Hardfisted(connie) -> therefore Hardfisted(connie) Hardfisted(connie) and forall x (Hardfisted(x) -> Unreserved(x)) -> therefore Unreserved(connie) Hooklike(connie) and Unreserved(connie) and Hooklike(connie) and Unreserved(connie) -> Exportable(connie) -> therefore Exportable(connie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Quigman is not tactless. Quigman is sceptred. Quigman is half. Quigman is simplistic. Elga is not tactless. Elga is sceptred. Elga is half. Cold, coalescent things are frail. If Elga is half and Elga is simplistic then Elga is frail. If something is sabbatic then it is simplistic. Nice things are simplistic. If something is sabbatic and not coalescent then it is not half. If Elga is not tactless then Elga is sabbatic. Quigman is not frail.", "logic": "\nnot Tactless(quigman)\nSceptred(quigman)\nHalf(quigman)\nSimplistic(quigman)\nnot Tactless(elga)\nSceptred(elga)\nHalf(elga)\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) and Coalescent(x) -> Frail(x))\nHalf(elga) and Simplistic(elga) -> Frail(elga)\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Simplistic(x))\nforall x (Coalescent(x) -> Simplistic(x))\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) and not Coalescent(x) -> not Half(x))\nnot Tactless(elga) -> Sabbatic(elga)\n\nnot Frail(quigman)\n\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) and Coalescent(x) -> Frail(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Cristy is not sanctioned. Cristy is hypnotized. Cristy is capitulary. Cristy is racist. Letta is not sanctioned. Letta is hypnotized. Letta is capitulary. Cold, magical things are bursiform. If Letta is capitulary and Letta is racist then Letta is bursiform. If something is malian then it is racist. Nice things are racist. If something is malian and not magical then it is not capitulary. If Letta is not sanctioned then Letta is malian. Cristy is magical.", "logic": "\nnot Sanctioned(cristy)\nHypnotized(cristy)\nCapitulary(cristy)\nRacist(cristy)\nnot Sanctioned(letta)\nHypnotized(letta)\nCapitulary(letta)\nforall x (Malian(x) and Magical(x) -> Bursiform(x))\nCapitulary(letta) and Racist(letta) -> Bursiform(letta)\nforall x (Malian(x) -> Racist(x))\nforall x (Magical(x) -> Racist(x))\nforall x (Malian(x) and not Magical(x) -> not Capitulary(x))\nnot Sanctioned(letta) -> Malian(letta)\n\nMagical(cristy)\n\nMagical(cristy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Vincents is not ametabolic. Vincents is boxy. Vincents is foliated. Vincents is hearable. Reeva is not ametabolic. Reeva is boxy. Reeva is foliated. Cold, faultless things are sundried. If Reeva is foliated and Reeva is hearable then Reeva is sundried. If something is varnished then it is hearable. Nice things are hearable. If something is varnished and not faultless then it is not foliated. If Reeva is not ametabolic then Reeva is varnished. Vincents is not varnished.", "logic": "\nnot Ametabolic(vincents)\nBoxy(vincents)\nFoliated(vincents)\nHearable(vincents)\nnot Ametabolic(reeva)\nBoxy(reeva)\nFoliated(reeva)\nforall x (Varnished(x) and Faultless(x) -> Sundried(x))\nFoliated(reeva) and Hearable(reeva) -> Sundried(reeva)\nforall x (Varnished(x) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Faultless(x) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) and not Faultless(x) -> not Foliated(x))\nnot Ametabolic(reeva) -> Varnished(reeva)\n\nnot Varnished(vincents)\n\nnot Varnished(vincents) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Waverley is not palpebrate. Waverley is victorious. Waverley is coarctate. Waverley is undersea. Sophia is not palpebrate. Sophia is victorious. Sophia is coarctate. Cold, adamant things are boytrose. If Sophia is coarctate and Sophia is undersea then Sophia is boytrose. If something is seedy then it is undersea. Nice things are undersea. If something is seedy and not adamant then it is not coarctate. If Sophia is not palpebrate then Sophia is seedy. Sophia is adamant.", "logic": "\nnot Palpebrate(waverley)\nVictorious(waverley)\nCoarctate(waverley)\nUndersea(waverley)\nnot Palpebrate(sophia)\nVictorious(sophia)\nCoarctate(sophia)\nforall x (Seedy(x) and Adamant(x) -> Boytrose(x))\nCoarctate(sophia) and Undersea(sophia) -> Boytrose(sophia)\nforall x (Seedy(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Adamant(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Seedy(x) and not Adamant(x) -> not Coarctate(x))\nnot Palpebrate(sophia) -> Seedy(sophia)\n\nAdamant(sophia)\n\nAdamant(sophia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Cappella is severed. Nixie is nonplussed. Godard is teeming. Bel is teeming. All teeming things are condemning. If something is aerobic then it is teeming. White things are severed. Nice, nonplussed things are aerobic. Quiet things are nonplussed. If Godard is aerobic then Godard is boon. Godard is teeming.", "logic": "\nSevered(cappella)\nNonplussed(nixie)\nTeeming(godard)\nTeeming(bel)\nforall x (Teeming(x) -> Condemning(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Condemning(x) -> Severed(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and Nonplussed(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Severed(x) -> Nonplussed(x))\nAerobic(godard) -> Boon(godard)\n\nTeeming(godard)\n\ntherefore Teeming(godard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Jayme is affordable. Rowe is aphakic. Yonina is ephesian. Jessie is ephesian. All ephesian things are scrivened. If something is daily then it is ephesian. White things are affordable. Nice, aphakic things are daily. Quiet things are aphakic. If Yonina is daily then Yonina is verbalized. Jessie is not ephesian.", "logic": "\nAffordable(jayme)\nAphakic(rowe)\nEphesian(yonina)\nEphesian(jessie)\nforall x (Ephesian(x) -> Scrivened(x))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Affordable(x))\nforall x (Verdant(x) and Aphakic(x) -> Daily(x))\nforall x (Affordable(x) -> Aphakic(x))\nDaily(yonina) -> Verbalized(yonina)\n\nnot Ephesian(jessie)\n\ntherefore Ephesian(jessie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Osmond is braided. Rob is nonunion. Leonard is chaste. Aurlie is chaste. All chaste things are masted. If something is laryngeal then it is chaste. White things are braided. Nice, nonunion things are laryngeal. Quiet things are nonunion. If Leonard is laryngeal then Leonard is outspread. Osmond is nonunion.", "logic": "\nBraided(osmond)\nNonunion(rob)\nChaste(leonard)\nChaste(aurlie)\nforall x (Chaste(x) -> Masted(x))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Chaste(x))\nforall x (Masted(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Assuming(x) and Nonunion(x) -> Laryngeal(x))\nforall x (Braided(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nLaryngeal(leonard) -> Outspread(leonard)\n\nNonunion(osmond)\n\nBraided(osmond) and forall x (Braided(x) -> Nonunion(x)) -> therefore Nonunion(osmond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Noah is apophyseal. Modesta is advective. Raf is unromantic. Melantha is unromantic. All unromantic things are upstream. If something is blurry then it is unromantic. White things are apophyseal. Nice, advective things are blurry. Quiet things are advective. If Raf is blurry then Raf is vitreous. Noah is not advective.", "logic": "\nApophyseal(noah)\nAdvective(modesta)\nUnromantic(raf)\nUnromantic(melantha)\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Upstream(x))\nforall x (Blurry(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nforall x (Upstream(x) -> Apophyseal(x))\nforall x (Stretched(x) and Advective(x) -> Blurry(x))\nforall x (Apophyseal(x) -> Advective(x))\nBlurry(raf) -> Vitreous(raf)\n\nnot Advective(noah)\n\nApophyseal(noah) and forall x (Apophyseal(x) -> Advective(x)) -> therefore Advective(noah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Faythe is byzantine. Jenette is winglike. Allen is adiabatic. Chloette is adiabatic. All adiabatic things are ahead. If something is linnaean then it is adiabatic. White things are byzantine. Nice, winglike things are linnaean. Quiet things are winglike. If Allen is linnaean then Allen is crank. Chloette is byzantine.", "logic": "\nByzantine(faythe)\nWinglike(jenette)\nAdiabatic(allen)\nAdiabatic(chloette)\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) -> Ahead(x))\nforall x (Linnaean(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Ahead(x) -> Byzantine(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) and Winglike(x) -> Linnaean(x))\nforall x (Byzantine(x) -> Winglike(x))\nLinnaean(allen) -> Crank(allen)\n\nByzantine(chloette)\n\nAdiabatic(chloette) and forall x (Adiabatic(x) -> Ahead(x)) -> therefore Ahead(chloette) Ahead(chloette) and forall x (Ahead(x) -> Byzantine(x)) -> therefore Byzantine(chloette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Shaughn is unflagging. Mallorie is acentric. Etti is centenary. Wendeline is centenary. All centenary things are different. If something is unburdened then it is centenary. White things are unflagging. Nice, acentric things are unburdened. Quiet things are acentric. If Etti is unburdened then Etti is spongelike. Etti is not unflagging.", "logic": "\nUnflagging(shaughn)\nAcentric(mallorie)\nCentenary(etti)\nCentenary(wendeline)\nforall x (Centenary(x) -> Different(x))\nforall x (Unburdened(x) -> Centenary(x))\nforall x (Different(x) -> Unflagging(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) and Acentric(x) -> Unburdened(x))\nforall x (Unflagging(x) -> Acentric(x))\nUnburdened(etti) -> Spongelike(etti)\n\nnot Unflagging(etti)\n\nCentenary(etti) and forall x (Centenary(x) -> Different(x)) -> therefore Different(etti) Different(etti) and forall x (Different(x) -> Unflagging(x)) -> therefore Unflagging(etti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Vivie is conceited. Patel is clubbish. Neil is enhancive. Nanon is enhancive. All enhancive things are outdated. If something is fortified then it is enhancive. White things are conceited. Nice, clubbish things are fortified. Quiet things are clubbish. If Neil is fortified then Neil is decussate. Neil is clubbish.", "logic": "\nConceited(vivie)\nClubbish(patel)\nEnhancive(neil)\nEnhancive(nanon)\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Outdated(x))\nforall x (Fortified(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Outdated(x) -> Conceited(x))\nforall x (Bewitched(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Fortified(x))\nforall x (Conceited(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nFortified(neil) -> Decussate(neil)\n\nClubbish(neil)\n\nEnhancive(neil) and forall x (Enhancive(x) -> Outdated(x)) -> therefore Outdated(neil) Outdated(neil) and forall x (Outdated(x) -> Conceited(x)) -> therefore Conceited(neil) Conceited(neil) and forall x (Conceited(x) -> Clubbish(x)) -> therefore Clubbish(neil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Brit is alvine. Masha is buttonlike. Annamaria is yeatsian. Nellie is yeatsian. All yeatsian things are sheltered. If something is prone then it is yeatsian. White things are alvine. Nice, buttonlike things are prone. Quiet things are buttonlike. If Annamaria is prone then Annamaria is specific. Annamaria is not buttonlike.", "logic": "\nAlvine(brit)\nButtonlike(masha)\nYeatsian(annamaria)\nYeatsian(nellie)\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) -> Sheltered(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Sheltered(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Altruistic(x) and Buttonlike(x) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nProne(annamaria) -> Specific(annamaria)\n\nnot Buttonlike(annamaria)\n\nYeatsian(annamaria) and forall x (Yeatsian(x) -> Sheltered(x)) -> therefore Sheltered(annamaria) Sheltered(annamaria) and forall x (Sheltered(x) -> Alvine(x)) -> therefore Alvine(annamaria) Alvine(annamaria) and forall x (Alvine(x) -> Buttonlike(x)) -> therefore Buttonlike(annamaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Shaylyn is olympian. Carley is able. Stevy is blistery. Dawson is blistery. All blistery things are annelid. If something is cytologic then it is blistery. White things are olympian. Nice, able things are cytologic. Quiet things are able. If Stevy is cytologic then Stevy is opalescent. Shaylyn is not annelid.", "logic": "\nOlympian(shaylyn)\nAble(carley)\nBlistery(stevy)\nBlistery(dawson)\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Annelid(x))\nforall x (Cytologic(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Annelid(x) -> Olympian(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) and Able(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Olympian(x) -> Able(x))\nCytologic(stevy) -> Opalescent(stevy)\n\nnot Annelid(shaylyn)\n\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Annelid(x)) <- forall x (Cytologic(x) -> Blistery(x)) <- forall x (Operose(x) and Able(x) -> Cytologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Olag is obedient. Lelah is advertent. Aloise is voluted. Nessie is voluted. All voluted things are bleary. If something is travelled then it is voluted. White things are obedient. Nice, advertent things are travelled. Quiet things are advertent. If Aloise is travelled then Aloise is persistent. Lelah is obedient.", "logic": "\nObedient(olag)\nAdvertent(lelah)\nVoluted(aloise)\nVoluted(nessie)\nforall x (Voluted(x) -> Bleary(x))\nforall x (Travelled(x) -> Voluted(x))\nforall x (Bleary(x) -> Obedient(x))\nforall x (Chthonian(x) and Advertent(x) -> Travelled(x))\nforall x (Obedient(x) -> Advertent(x))\nTravelled(aloise) -> Persistent(aloise)\n\nObedient(lelah)\n\nforall x (Bleary(x) -> Obedient(x)) <- forall x (Voluted(x) -> Bleary(x)) <- forall x (Travelled(x) -> Voluted(x)) <- forall x (Chthonian(x) and Advertent(x) -> Travelled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Carmon is lacelike. Aileen is tined. Rees is wavering. Emilia is wavering. All wavering things are mephitic. If something is unwearying then it is wavering. White things are lacelike. Nice, tined things are unwearying. Quiet things are tined. If Rees is unwearying then Rees is devilish. Aileen is not wavering.", "logic": "\nLacelike(carmon)\nTined(aileen)\nWavering(rees)\nWavering(emilia)\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) -> Wavering(x))\nforall x (Mephitic(x) -> Lacelike(x))\nforall x (Gradatory(x) and Tined(x) -> Unwearying(x))\nforall x (Lacelike(x) -> Tined(x))\nUnwearying(rees) -> Devilish(rees)\n\nnot Wavering(aileen)\n\nforall x (Unwearying(x) -> Wavering(x)) <- forall x (Gradatory(x) and Tined(x) -> Unwearying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Valene is bulblike. Herman is redeeming. Jacklyn is starlike. Jordan is starlike. All starlike things are incessant. If something is curvaceous then it is starlike. White things are bulblike. Nice, redeeming things are curvaceous. Quiet things are redeeming. If Jacklyn is curvaceous then Jacklyn is tinkling. Valene is curvaceous.", "logic": "\nBulblike(valene)\nRedeeming(herman)\nStarlike(jacklyn)\nStarlike(jordan)\nforall x (Starlike(x) -> Incessant(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) -> Starlike(x))\nforall x (Incessant(x) -> Bulblike(x))\nforall x (Several(x) and Redeeming(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\nforall x (Bulblike(x) -> Redeeming(x))\nCurvaceous(jacklyn) -> Tinkling(jacklyn)\n\nCurvaceous(valene)\n\nforall x (Several(x) and Redeeming(x) -> Curvaceous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Faythe is rustproof. Alonzo is offending. Dotti is haired. Virgie is haired. All haired things are malaysian. If something is starring then it is haired. White things are rustproof. Nice, offending things are starring. Quiet things are offending. If Dotti is starring then Dotti is eponymous. Virgie is not eponymous.", "logic": "\nRustproof(faythe)\nOffending(alonzo)\nHaired(dotti)\nHaired(virgie)\nforall x (Haired(x) -> Malaysian(x))\nforall x (Starring(x) -> Haired(x))\nforall x (Malaysian(x) -> Rustproof(x))\nforall x (Discarded(x) and Offending(x) -> Starring(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Offending(x))\nStarring(dotti) -> Eponymous(dotti)\n\nnot Eponymous(virgie)\n\nnot Eponymous(virgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Flossie is fatal. Velvet is poisonous. Jory is casuistic. Nonna is casuistic. All casuistic things are surmisable. If something is aeschylean then it is casuistic. White things are fatal. Nice, poisonous things are aeschylean. Quiet things are poisonous. If Jory is aeschylean then Jory is aeriform. Flossie is wrapped.", "logic": "\nFatal(flossie)\nPoisonous(velvet)\nCasuistic(jory)\nCasuistic(nonna)\nforall x (Casuistic(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) -> Casuistic(x))\nforall x (Surmisable(x) -> Fatal(x))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) and Poisonous(x) -> Aeschylean(x))\nforall x (Fatal(x) -> Poisonous(x))\nAeschylean(jory) -> Aeriform(jory)\n\nWrapped(flossie)\n\nWrapped(flossie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Kaye is injured. Farrah is screwball. Janet is unsheared. Lilly is unsheared. All unsheared things are etiologic. If something is quasi then it is unsheared. White things are injured. Nice, screwball things are quasi. Quiet things are screwball. If Janet is quasi then Janet is overfull. Kaye is not overfull.", "logic": "\nInjured(kaye)\nScrewball(farrah)\nUnsheared(janet)\nUnsheared(lilly)\nforall x (Unsheared(x) -> Etiologic(x))\nforall x (Quasi(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Etiologic(x) -> Injured(x))\nforall x (Roofless(x) and Screwball(x) -> Quasi(x))\nforall x (Injured(x) -> Screwball(x))\nQuasi(janet) -> Overfull(janet)\n\nnot Overfull(kaye)\n\nnot Overfull(kaye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Ravil is coquettish. Odin is streetwise. Sharia is stepwise. Cob is stepwise. All stepwise things are unaddicted. If something is aloof then it is stepwise. White things are coquettish. Nice, streetwise things are aloof. Quiet things are streetwise. If Sharia is aloof then Sharia is reductive. Odin is reductive.", "logic": "\nCoquettish(ravil)\nStreetwise(odin)\nStepwise(sharia)\nStepwise(cob)\nforall x (Stepwise(x) -> Unaddicted(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Stepwise(x))\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) -> Coquettish(x))\nforall x (Sectorial(x) and Streetwise(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Coquettish(x) -> Streetwise(x))\nAloof(sharia) -> Reductive(sharia)\n\nReductive(odin)\n\nReductive(odin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "The audra does not chase the edyth. The audra does not see the george. The george is flushed. The george is adducting. The george whang the edyth. The orsola exclude the george. The orsola exclude the edyth. The orsola is flushed. The orsola is firm. The orsola whang the george. The orsola whang the edyth. The edyth exclude the george. If someone is flushed then they see the george. If someone whang the orsola then the orsola unblock the audra. If someone exclude the edyth then the edyth unblock the george. If someone exclude the orsola then they see the audra. If someone exclude the george and they are not adducting then the george exclude the audra. If someone unblock the george and they are flushed then the george exclude the orsola. If the audra is flushed and the audra whang the edyth then the audra exclude the orsola. If the george does not chase the audra and the george is not adducting then the george whang the audra. The orsola whang the edyth.", "logic": "\nnot Exclude(audra, edyth)\nnot Unblock(audra, george)\nFlushed(george)\nAdducting(george)\nWhang(george, edyth)\nExclude(orsola, george)\nExclude(orsola, edyth)\nFlushed(orsola)\nFirm(orsola)\nWhang(orsola, george)\nWhang(orsola, edyth)\nExclude(edyth, george)\nforall x (Flushed(x) -> Unblock(x, george))\nforall x (Whang(x, orsola) -> Unblock(orsola, audra))\nforall x (Exclude(x, edyth) -> Unblock(edyth, george))\nforall x (Exclude(x, orsola) -> Unblock(x, audra))\nforall x (Exclude(x, george) and not Adducting(x) -> Exclude(george, audra))\nforall x (Unblock(x, george) and Flushed(x) -> Exclude(george, orsola))\nFlushed(audra) and Whang(audra, edyth) -> Exclude(audra, orsola)\nnot Exclude(george, audra) and not Adducting(george) -> Whang(george, audra)\n\nWhang(orsola, edyth)\n\ntherefore Whang(orsola, edyth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The becka does not chase the candra. The becka does not see the terry. The terry is oviform. The terry is tasteful. The terry devour the candra. The raynor lamb the terry. The raynor lamb the candra. The raynor is oviform. The raynor is ebracteate. The raynor devour the terry. The raynor devour the candra. The candra lamb the terry. If someone is oviform then they see the terry. If someone devour the raynor then the raynor brawl the becka. If someone lamb the candra then the candra brawl the terry. If someone lamb the raynor then they see the becka. If someone lamb the terry and they are not tasteful then the terry lamb the becka. If someone brawl the terry and they are oviform then the terry lamb the raynor. If the becka is oviform and the becka devour the candra then the becka lamb the raynor. If the terry does not chase the becka and the terry is not tasteful then the terry devour the becka. The candra does not chase the terry.", "logic": "\nnot Lamb(becka, candra)\nnot Brawl(becka, terry)\nOviform(terry)\nTasteful(terry)\nDevour(terry, candra)\nLamb(raynor, terry)\nLamb(raynor, candra)\nOviform(raynor)\nEbracteate(raynor)\nDevour(raynor, terry)\nDevour(raynor, candra)\nLamb(candra, terry)\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Brawl(x, terry))\nforall x (Devour(x, raynor) -> Brawl(raynor, becka))\nforall x (Lamb(x, candra) -> Brawl(candra, terry))\nforall x (Lamb(x, raynor) -> Brawl(x, becka))\nforall x (Lamb(x, terry) and not Tasteful(x) -> Lamb(terry, becka))\nforall x (Brawl(x, terry) and Oviform(x) -> Lamb(terry, raynor))\nOviform(becka) and Devour(becka, candra) -> Lamb(becka, raynor)\nnot Lamb(terry, becka) and not Tasteful(terry) -> Devour(terry, becka)\n\nnot Lamb(candra, terry)\n\ntherefore Lamb(candra, terry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The tilly does not chase the orelia. The tilly does not see the kora. The kora is genoese. The kora is copulatory. The kora covet the orelia. The candy coldwork the kora. The candy coldwork the orelia. The candy is genoese. The candy is sanious. The candy covet the kora. The candy covet the orelia. The orelia coldwork the kora. If someone is genoese then they see the kora. If someone covet the candy then the candy brail the tilly. If someone coldwork the orelia then the orelia brail the kora. If someone coldwork the candy then they see the tilly. If someone coldwork the kora and they are not copulatory then the kora coldwork the tilly. If someone brail the kora and they are genoese then the kora coldwork the candy. If the tilly is genoese and the tilly covet the orelia then the tilly coldwork the candy. If the kora does not chase the tilly and the kora is not copulatory then the kora covet the tilly. The candy brail the kora.", "logic": "\nnot Coldwork(tilly, orelia)\nnot Brail(tilly, kora)\nGenoese(kora)\nCopulatory(kora)\nCovet(kora, orelia)\nColdwork(candy, kora)\nColdwork(candy, orelia)\nGenoese(candy)\nSanious(candy)\nCovet(candy, kora)\nCovet(candy, orelia)\nColdwork(orelia, kora)\nforall x (Genoese(x) -> Brail(x, kora))\nforall x (Covet(x, candy) -> Brail(candy, tilly))\nforall x (Coldwork(x, orelia) -> Brail(orelia, kora))\nforall x (Coldwork(x, candy) -> Brail(x, tilly))\nforall x (Coldwork(x, kora) and not Copulatory(x) -> Coldwork(kora, tilly))\nforall x (Brail(x, kora) and Genoese(x) -> Coldwork(kora, candy))\nGenoese(tilly) and Covet(tilly, orelia) -> Coldwork(tilly, candy)\nnot Coldwork(kora, tilly) and not Copulatory(kora) -> Covet(kora, tilly)\n\nBrail(candy, kora)\n\nGenoese(candy) and forall x (Genoese(x) -> Brail(x, kora)) -> therefore Brail(candy, kora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The jermayne does not chase the martin. The jermayne does not see the sallee. The sallee is polychrome. The sallee is extremist. The sallee lustrate the martin. The alia spring the sallee. The alia spring the martin. The alia is polychrome. The alia is immoveable. The alia lustrate the sallee. The alia lustrate the martin. The martin spring the sallee. If someone is polychrome then they see the sallee. If someone lustrate the alia then the alia boondoggle the jermayne. If someone spring the martin then the martin boondoggle the sallee. If someone spring the alia then they see the jermayne. If someone spring the sallee and they are not extremist then the sallee spring the jermayne. If someone boondoggle the sallee and they are polychrome then the sallee spring the alia. If the jermayne is polychrome and the jermayne lustrate the martin then the jermayne spring the alia. If the sallee does not chase the jermayne and the sallee is not extremist then the sallee lustrate the jermayne. The martin does not see the sallee.", "logic": "\nnot Spring(jermayne, martin)\nnot Boondoggle(jermayne, sallee)\nPolychrome(sallee)\nExtremist(sallee)\nLustrate(sallee, martin)\nSpring(alia, sallee)\nSpring(alia, martin)\nPolychrome(alia)\nImmoveable(alia)\nLustrate(alia, sallee)\nLustrate(alia, martin)\nSpring(martin, sallee)\nforall x (Polychrome(x) -> Boondoggle(x, sallee))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, alia) -> Boondoggle(alia, jermayne))\nforall x (Spring(x, martin) -> Boondoggle(martin, sallee))\nforall x (Spring(x, alia) -> Boondoggle(x, jermayne))\nforall x (Spring(x, sallee) and not Extremist(x) -> Spring(sallee, jermayne))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, sallee) and Polychrome(x) -> Spring(sallee, alia))\nPolychrome(jermayne) and Lustrate(jermayne, martin) -> Spring(jermayne, alia)\nnot Spring(sallee, jermayne) and not Extremist(sallee) -> Lustrate(sallee, jermayne)\n\nnot Boondoggle(martin, sallee)\n\nSpring(alia, martin) and forall x (Spring(x, martin) -> Boondoggle(martin, sallee)) -> therefore Boondoggle(martin, sallee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The tab does not chase the halie. The tab does not see the ardis. The ardis is portentous. The ardis is nonlinear. The ardis project the halie. The clarie gnaw the ardis. The clarie gnaw the halie. The clarie is portentous. The clarie is galore. The clarie project the ardis. The clarie project the halie. The halie gnaw the ardis. If someone is portentous then they see the ardis. If someone project the clarie then the clarie subtend the tab. If someone gnaw the halie then the halie subtend the ardis. If someone gnaw the clarie then they see the tab. If someone gnaw the ardis and they are not nonlinear then the ardis gnaw the tab. If someone subtend the ardis and they are portentous then the ardis gnaw the clarie. If the tab is portentous and the tab project the halie then the tab gnaw the clarie. If the ardis does not chase the tab and the ardis is not nonlinear then the ardis project the tab. The ardis gnaw the clarie.", "logic": "\nnot Gnaw(tab, halie)\nnot Subtend(tab, ardis)\nPortentous(ardis)\nNonlinear(ardis)\nProject(ardis, halie)\nGnaw(clarie, ardis)\nGnaw(clarie, halie)\nPortentous(clarie)\nGalore(clarie)\nProject(clarie, ardis)\nProject(clarie, halie)\nGnaw(halie, ardis)\nforall x (Portentous(x) -> Subtend(x, ardis))\nforall x (Project(x, clarie) -> Subtend(clarie, tab))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, halie) -> Subtend(halie, ardis))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, clarie) -> Subtend(x, tab))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, ardis) and not Nonlinear(x) -> Gnaw(ardis, tab))\nforall x (Subtend(x, ardis) and Portentous(x) -> Gnaw(ardis, clarie))\nPortentous(tab) and Project(tab, halie) -> Gnaw(tab, clarie)\nnot Gnaw(ardis, tab) and not Nonlinear(ardis) -> Project(ardis, tab)\n\nGnaw(ardis, clarie)\n\nPortentous(ardis) and forall x (Portentous(x) -> Subtend(x, ardis)) -> therefore Subtend(ardis, ardis) Subtend(ardis, ardis) and Portentous(ardis) and forall x (Subtend(x, ardis) and Portentous(x) -> Gnaw(ardis, clarie)) -> therefore Gnaw(ardis, clarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The amabelle does not chase the eunice. The amabelle does not see the darda. The darda is beguiled. The darda is blae. The darda subdivide the eunice. The robina crunch the darda. The robina crunch the eunice. The robina is beguiled. The robina is emended. The robina subdivide the darda. The robina subdivide the eunice. The eunice crunch the darda. If someone is beguiled then they see the darda. If someone subdivide the robina then the robina scorch the amabelle. If someone crunch the eunice then the eunice scorch the darda. If someone crunch the robina then they see the amabelle. If someone crunch the darda and they are not blae then the darda crunch the amabelle. If someone scorch the darda and they are beguiled then the darda crunch the robina. If the amabelle is beguiled and the amabelle subdivide the eunice then the amabelle crunch the robina. If the darda does not chase the amabelle and the darda is not blae then the darda subdivide the amabelle. The darda does not chase the robina.", "logic": "\nnot Crunch(amabelle, eunice)\nnot Scorch(amabelle, darda)\nBeguiled(darda)\nBlae(darda)\nSubdivide(darda, eunice)\nCrunch(robina, darda)\nCrunch(robina, eunice)\nBeguiled(robina)\nEmended(robina)\nSubdivide(robina, darda)\nSubdivide(robina, eunice)\nCrunch(eunice, darda)\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> Scorch(x, darda))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, robina) -> Scorch(robina, amabelle))\nforall x (Crunch(x, eunice) -> Scorch(eunice, darda))\nforall x (Crunch(x, robina) -> Scorch(x, amabelle))\nforall x (Crunch(x, darda) and not Blae(x) -> Crunch(darda, amabelle))\nforall x (Scorch(x, darda) and Beguiled(x) -> Crunch(darda, robina))\nBeguiled(amabelle) and Subdivide(amabelle, eunice) -> Crunch(amabelle, robina)\nnot Crunch(darda, amabelle) and not Blae(darda) -> Subdivide(darda, amabelle)\n\nnot Crunch(darda, robina)\n\nBeguiled(darda) and forall x (Beguiled(x) -> Scorch(x, darda)) -> therefore Scorch(darda, darda) Scorch(darda, darda) and Beguiled(darda) and forall x (Scorch(x, darda) and Beguiled(x) -> Crunch(darda, robina)) -> therefore Crunch(darda, robina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The clay does not chase the wilek. The clay does not see the kathlin. The kathlin is infatuated. The kathlin is deweyan. The kathlin tense the wilek. The hazel shrimp the kathlin. The hazel shrimp the wilek. The hazel is infatuated. The hazel is selected. The hazel tense the kathlin. The hazel tense the wilek. The wilek shrimp the kathlin. If someone is infatuated then they see the kathlin. If someone tense the hazel then the hazel buttonhole the clay. If someone shrimp the wilek then the wilek buttonhole the kathlin. If someone shrimp the hazel then they see the clay. If someone shrimp the kathlin and they are not deweyan then the kathlin shrimp the clay. If someone buttonhole the kathlin and they are infatuated then the kathlin shrimp the hazel. If the clay is infatuated and the clay tense the wilek then the clay shrimp the hazel. If the kathlin does not chase the clay and the kathlin is not deweyan then the kathlin tense the clay. The kathlin buttonhole the clay.", "logic": "\nnot Shrimp(clay, wilek)\nnot Buttonhole(clay, kathlin)\nInfatuated(kathlin)\nDeweyan(kathlin)\nTense(kathlin, wilek)\nShrimp(hazel, kathlin)\nShrimp(hazel, wilek)\nInfatuated(hazel)\nSelected(hazel)\nTense(hazel, kathlin)\nTense(hazel, wilek)\nShrimp(wilek, kathlin)\nforall x (Infatuated(x) -> Buttonhole(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Tense(x, hazel) -> Buttonhole(hazel, clay))\nforall x (Shrimp(x, wilek) -> Buttonhole(wilek, kathlin))\nforall x (Shrimp(x, hazel) -> Buttonhole(x, clay))\nforall x (Shrimp(x, kathlin) and not Deweyan(x) -> Shrimp(kathlin, clay))\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, kathlin) and Infatuated(x) -> Shrimp(kathlin, hazel))\nInfatuated(clay) and Tense(clay, wilek) -> Shrimp(clay, hazel)\nnot Shrimp(kathlin, clay) and not Deweyan(kathlin) -> Tense(kathlin, clay)\n\nButtonhole(kathlin, clay)\n\nInfatuated(kathlin) and forall x (Infatuated(x) -> Buttonhole(x, kathlin)) -> therefore Buttonhole(kathlin, kathlin) Buttonhole(kathlin, kathlin) and Infatuated(kathlin) and forall x (Buttonhole(x, kathlin) and Infatuated(x) -> Shrimp(kathlin, hazel)) -> therefore Shrimp(kathlin, hazel) Shrimp(kathlin, hazel) and forall x (Shrimp(x, hazel) -> Buttonhole(x, clay)) -> therefore Buttonhole(kathlin, clay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The maureen does not chase the hedi. The maureen does not see the gates. The gates is smudgy. The gates is hollow. The gates evaluate the hedi. The sig fellate the gates. The sig fellate the hedi. The sig is smudgy. The sig is passee. The sig evaluate the gates. The sig evaluate the hedi. The hedi fellate the gates. If someone is smudgy then they see the gates. If someone evaluate the sig then the sig hydrolize the maureen. If someone fellate the hedi then the hedi hydrolize the gates. If someone fellate the sig then they see the maureen. If someone fellate the gates and they are not hollow then the gates fellate the maureen. If someone hydrolize the gates and they are smudgy then the gates fellate the sig. If the maureen is smudgy and the maureen evaluate the hedi then the maureen fellate the sig. If the gates does not chase the maureen and the gates is not hollow then the gates evaluate the maureen. The gates does not see the maureen.", "logic": "\nnot Fellate(maureen, hedi)\nnot Hydrolize(maureen, gates)\nSmudgy(gates)\nHollow(gates)\nEvaluate(gates, hedi)\nFellate(sig, gates)\nFellate(sig, hedi)\nSmudgy(sig)\nPassee(sig)\nEvaluate(sig, gates)\nEvaluate(sig, hedi)\nFellate(hedi, gates)\nforall x (Smudgy(x) -> Hydrolize(x, gates))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, sig) -> Hydrolize(sig, maureen))\nforall x (Fellate(x, hedi) -> Hydrolize(hedi, gates))\nforall x (Fellate(x, sig) -> Hydrolize(x, maureen))\nforall x (Fellate(x, gates) and not Hollow(x) -> Fellate(gates, maureen))\nforall x (Hydrolize(x, gates) and Smudgy(x) -> Fellate(gates, sig))\nSmudgy(maureen) and Evaluate(maureen, hedi) -> Fellate(maureen, sig)\nnot Fellate(gates, maureen) and not Hollow(gates) -> Evaluate(gates, maureen)\n\nnot Hydrolize(gates, maureen)\n\nSmudgy(gates) and forall x (Smudgy(x) -> Hydrolize(x, gates)) -> therefore Hydrolize(gates, gates) Hydrolize(gates, gates) and Smudgy(gates) and forall x (Hydrolize(x, gates) and Smudgy(x) -> Fellate(gates, sig)) -> therefore Fellate(gates, sig) Fellate(gates, sig) and forall x (Fellate(x, sig) -> Hydrolize(x, maureen)) -> therefore Hydrolize(gates, maureen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The carine does not chase the camilla. The carine does not see the tiena. The tiena is acronymous. The tiena is tutorial. The tiena essay the camilla. The sib caulk the tiena. The sib caulk the camilla. The sib is acronymous. The sib is crummy. The sib essay the tiena. The sib essay the camilla. The camilla caulk the tiena. If someone is acronymous then they see the tiena. If someone essay the sib then the sib impose the carine. If someone caulk the camilla then the camilla impose the tiena. If someone caulk the sib then they see the carine. If someone caulk the tiena and they are not tutorial then the tiena caulk the carine. If someone impose the tiena and they are acronymous then the tiena caulk the sib. If the carine is acronymous and the carine essay the camilla then the carine caulk the sib. If the tiena does not chase the carine and the tiena is not tutorial then the tiena essay the carine. The tiena does not like the carine.", "logic": "\nnot Caulk(carine, camilla)\nnot Impose(carine, tiena)\nAcronymous(tiena)\nTutorial(tiena)\nEssay(tiena, camilla)\nCaulk(sib, tiena)\nCaulk(sib, camilla)\nAcronymous(sib)\nCrummy(sib)\nEssay(sib, tiena)\nEssay(sib, camilla)\nCaulk(camilla, tiena)\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Impose(x, tiena))\nforall x (Essay(x, sib) -> Impose(sib, carine))\nforall x (Caulk(x, camilla) -> Impose(camilla, tiena))\nforall x (Caulk(x, sib) -> Impose(x, carine))\nforall x (Caulk(x, tiena) and not Tutorial(x) -> Caulk(tiena, carine))\nforall x (Impose(x, tiena) and Acronymous(x) -> Caulk(tiena, sib))\nAcronymous(carine) and Essay(carine, camilla) -> Caulk(carine, sib)\nnot Caulk(tiena, carine) and not Tutorial(tiena) -> Essay(tiena, carine)\n\nnot Essay(tiena, carine)\n\nnot Caulk(tiena, carine) and not Tutorial(tiena) -> Essay(tiena, carine) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The licha does not chase the othilie. The licha does not see the nicolle. The nicolle is voluminous. The nicolle is clangorous. The nicolle carburet the othilie. The robb jellify the nicolle. The robb jellify the othilie. The robb is voluminous. The robb is disputable. The robb carburet the nicolle. The robb carburet the othilie. The othilie jellify the nicolle. If someone is voluminous then they see the nicolle. If someone carburet the robb then the robb sacrifice the licha. If someone jellify the othilie then the othilie sacrifice the nicolle. If someone jellify the robb then they see the licha. If someone jellify the nicolle and they are not clangorous then the nicolle jellify the licha. If someone sacrifice the nicolle and they are voluminous then the nicolle jellify the robb. If the licha is voluminous and the licha carburet the othilie then the licha jellify the robb. If the nicolle does not chase the licha and the nicolle is not clangorous then the nicolle carburet the licha. The licha sacrifice the licha.", "logic": "\nnot Jellify(licha, othilie)\nnot Sacrifice(licha, nicolle)\nVoluminous(nicolle)\nClangorous(nicolle)\nCarburet(nicolle, othilie)\nJellify(robb, nicolle)\nJellify(robb, othilie)\nVoluminous(robb)\nDisputable(robb)\nCarburet(robb, nicolle)\nCarburet(robb, othilie)\nJellify(othilie, nicolle)\nforall x (Voluminous(x) -> Sacrifice(x, nicolle))\nforall x (Carburet(x, robb) -> Sacrifice(robb, licha))\nforall x (Jellify(x, othilie) -> Sacrifice(othilie, nicolle))\nforall x (Jellify(x, robb) -> Sacrifice(x, licha))\nforall x (Jellify(x, nicolle) and not Clangorous(x) -> Jellify(nicolle, licha))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, nicolle) and Voluminous(x) -> Jellify(nicolle, robb))\nVoluminous(licha) and Carburet(licha, othilie) -> Jellify(licha, robb)\nnot Jellify(nicolle, licha) and not Clangorous(nicolle) -> Carburet(nicolle, licha)\n\nSacrifice(licha, licha)\n\nforall x (Jellify(x, robb) -> Sacrifice(x, licha)) <- Voluminous(licha) and Carburet(licha, othilie) -> Jellify(licha, robb) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The sadella does not chase the abagael. The sadella does not see the lorie. The lorie is conjunct. The lorie is glowing. The lorie triple the abagael. The otis instill the lorie. The otis instill the abagael. The otis is conjunct. The otis is ashy. The otis triple the lorie. The otis triple the abagael. The abagael instill the lorie. If someone is conjunct then they see the lorie. If someone triple the otis then the otis arraign the sadella. If someone instill the abagael then the abagael arraign the lorie. If someone instill the otis then they see the sadella. If someone instill the lorie and they are not glowing then the lorie instill the sadella. If someone arraign the lorie and they are conjunct then the lorie instill the otis. If the sadella is conjunct and the sadella triple the abagael then the sadella instill the otis. If the lorie does not chase the sadella and the lorie is not glowing then the lorie triple the sadella. The lorie does not chase the sadella.", "logic": "\nnot Instill(sadella, abagael)\nnot Arraign(sadella, lorie)\nConjunct(lorie)\nGlowing(lorie)\nTriple(lorie, abagael)\nInstill(otis, lorie)\nInstill(otis, abagael)\nConjunct(otis)\nAshy(otis)\nTriple(otis, lorie)\nTriple(otis, abagael)\nInstill(abagael, lorie)\nforall x (Conjunct(x) -> Arraign(x, lorie))\nforall x (Triple(x, otis) -> Arraign(otis, sadella))\nforall x (Instill(x, abagael) -> Arraign(abagael, lorie))\nforall x (Instill(x, otis) -> Arraign(x, sadella))\nforall x (Instill(x, lorie) and not Glowing(x) -> Instill(lorie, sadella))\nforall x (Arraign(x, lorie) and Conjunct(x) -> Instill(lorie, otis))\nConjunct(sadella) and Triple(sadella, abagael) -> Instill(sadella, otis)\nnot Instill(lorie, sadella) and not Glowing(lorie) -> Triple(lorie, sadella)\n\nnot Instill(lorie, sadella)\n\nforall x (Instill(x, lorie) and not Glowing(x) -> Instill(lorie, sadella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The erl does not chase the dinnie. The erl does not see the ardys. The ardys is modified. The ardys is palpebrate. The ardys syllogise the dinnie. The lynnett hoof the ardys. The lynnett hoof the dinnie. The lynnett is modified. The lynnett is lapidarian. The lynnett syllogise the ardys. The lynnett syllogise the dinnie. The dinnie hoof the ardys. If someone is modified then they see the ardys. If someone syllogise the lynnett then the lynnett sensify the erl. If someone hoof the dinnie then the dinnie sensify the ardys. If someone hoof the lynnett then they see the erl. If someone hoof the ardys and they are not palpebrate then the ardys hoof the erl. If someone sensify the ardys and they are modified then the ardys hoof the lynnett. If the erl is modified and the erl syllogise the dinnie then the erl hoof the lynnett. If the ardys does not chase the erl and the ardys is not palpebrate then the ardys syllogise the erl. The lynnett sensify the erl.", "logic": "\nnot Hoof(erl, dinnie)\nnot Sensify(erl, ardys)\nModified(ardys)\nPalpebrate(ardys)\nSyllogise(ardys, dinnie)\nHoof(lynnett, ardys)\nHoof(lynnett, dinnie)\nModified(lynnett)\nLapidarian(lynnett)\nSyllogise(lynnett, ardys)\nSyllogise(lynnett, dinnie)\nHoof(dinnie, ardys)\nforall x (Modified(x) -> Sensify(x, ardys))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, lynnett) -> Sensify(lynnett, erl))\nforall x (Hoof(x, dinnie) -> Sensify(dinnie, ardys))\nforall x (Hoof(x, lynnett) -> Sensify(x, erl))\nforall x (Hoof(x, ardys) and not Palpebrate(x) -> Hoof(ardys, erl))\nforall x (Sensify(x, ardys) and Modified(x) -> Hoof(ardys, lynnett))\nModified(erl) and Syllogise(erl, dinnie) -> Hoof(erl, lynnett)\nnot Hoof(ardys, erl) and not Palpebrate(ardys) -> Syllogise(ardys, erl)\n\nSensify(lynnett, erl)\n\nforall x (Syllogise(x, lynnett) -> Sensify(lynnett, erl)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The georgine does not chase the ismail. The georgine does not see the phedra. The phedra is interlaced. The phedra is waxlike. The phedra career the ismail. The fancy customise the phedra. The fancy customise the ismail. The fancy is interlaced. The fancy is pizzicato. The fancy career the phedra. The fancy career the ismail. The ismail customise the phedra. If someone is interlaced then they see the phedra. If someone career the fancy then the fancy rearm the georgine. If someone customise the ismail then the ismail rearm the phedra. If someone customise the fancy then they see the georgine. If someone customise the phedra and they are not waxlike then the phedra customise the georgine. If someone rearm the phedra and they are interlaced then the phedra customise the fancy. If the georgine is interlaced and the georgine career the ismail then the georgine customise the fancy. If the phedra does not chase the georgine and the phedra is not waxlike then the phedra career the georgine. The ismail does not like the georgine.", "logic": "\nnot Customise(georgine, ismail)\nnot Rearm(georgine, phedra)\nInterlaced(phedra)\nWaxlike(phedra)\nCareer(phedra, ismail)\nCustomise(fancy, phedra)\nCustomise(fancy, ismail)\nInterlaced(fancy)\nPizzicato(fancy)\nCareer(fancy, phedra)\nCareer(fancy, ismail)\nCustomise(ismail, phedra)\nforall x (Interlaced(x) -> Rearm(x, phedra))\nforall x (Career(x, fancy) -> Rearm(fancy, georgine))\nforall x (Customise(x, ismail) -> Rearm(ismail, phedra))\nforall x (Customise(x, fancy) -> Rearm(x, georgine))\nforall x (Customise(x, phedra) and not Waxlike(x) -> Customise(phedra, georgine))\nforall x (Rearm(x, phedra) and Interlaced(x) -> Customise(phedra, fancy))\nInterlaced(georgine) and Career(georgine, ismail) -> Customise(georgine, fancy)\nnot Customise(phedra, georgine) and not Waxlike(phedra) -> Career(phedra, georgine)\n\nnot Career(ismail, georgine)\n\nnot Career(ismail, georgine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The jaime does not chase the deonne. The jaime does not see the michaela. The michaela is somnific. The michaela is chirpy. The michaela bacterize the deonne. The atlante breach the michaela. The atlante breach the deonne. The atlante is somnific. The atlante is scalelike. The atlante bacterize the michaela. The atlante bacterize the deonne. The deonne breach the michaela. If someone is somnific then they see the michaela. If someone bacterize the atlante then the atlante converse the jaime. If someone breach the deonne then the deonne converse the michaela. If someone breach the atlante then they see the jaime. If someone breach the michaela and they are not chirpy then the michaela breach the jaime. If someone converse the michaela and they are somnific then the michaela breach the atlante. If the jaime is somnific and the jaime bacterize the deonne then the jaime breach the atlante. If the michaela does not chase the jaime and the michaela is not chirpy then the michaela bacterize the jaime. The atlante is nice.", "logic": "\nnot Breach(jaime, deonne)\nnot Converse(jaime, michaela)\nSomnific(michaela)\nChirpy(michaela)\nBacterize(michaela, deonne)\nBreach(atlante, michaela)\nBreach(atlante, deonne)\nSomnific(atlante)\nScalelike(atlante)\nBacterize(atlante, michaela)\nBacterize(atlante, deonne)\nBreach(deonne, michaela)\nforall x (Somnific(x) -> Converse(x, michaela))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, atlante) -> Converse(atlante, jaime))\nforall x (Breach(x, deonne) -> Converse(deonne, michaela))\nforall x (Breach(x, atlante) -> Converse(x, jaime))\nforall x (Breach(x, michaela) and not Chirpy(x) -> Breach(michaela, jaime))\nforall x (Converse(x, michaela) and Somnific(x) -> Breach(michaela, atlante))\nSomnific(jaime) and Bacterize(jaime, deonne) -> Breach(jaime, atlante)\nnot Breach(michaela, jaime) and not Chirpy(michaela) -> Bacterize(michaela, jaime)\n\nNice(atlante)\n\nNice(atlante) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The gonzales does not chase the tabbie. The gonzales does not see the fleming. The fleming is reposeful. The fleming is asphaltic. The fleming erupt the tabbie. The micah barf the fleming. The micah barf the tabbie. The micah is reposeful. The micah is coarsened. The micah erupt the fleming. The micah erupt the tabbie. The tabbie barf the fleming. If someone is reposeful then they see the fleming. If someone erupt the micah then the micah mangle the gonzales. If someone barf the tabbie then the tabbie mangle the fleming. If someone barf the micah then they see the gonzales. If someone barf the fleming and they are not asphaltic then the fleming barf the gonzales. If someone mangle the fleming and they are reposeful then the fleming barf the micah. If the gonzales is reposeful and the gonzales erupt the tabbie then the gonzales barf the micah. If the fleming does not chase the gonzales and the fleming is not asphaltic then the fleming erupt the gonzales. The micah does not chase the gonzales.", "logic": "\nnot Barf(gonzales, tabbie)\nnot Mangle(gonzales, fleming)\nReposeful(fleming)\nAsphaltic(fleming)\nErupt(fleming, tabbie)\nBarf(micah, fleming)\nBarf(micah, tabbie)\nReposeful(micah)\nCoarsened(micah)\nErupt(micah, fleming)\nErupt(micah, tabbie)\nBarf(tabbie, fleming)\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Mangle(x, fleming))\nforall x (Erupt(x, micah) -> Mangle(micah, gonzales))\nforall x (Barf(x, tabbie) -> Mangle(tabbie, fleming))\nforall x (Barf(x, micah) -> Mangle(x, gonzales))\nforall x (Barf(x, fleming) and not Asphaltic(x) -> Barf(fleming, gonzales))\nforall x (Mangle(x, fleming) and Reposeful(x) -> Barf(fleming, micah))\nReposeful(gonzales) and Erupt(gonzales, tabbie) -> Barf(gonzales, micah)\nnot Barf(fleming, gonzales) and not Asphaltic(fleming) -> Erupt(fleming, gonzales)\n\nnot Barf(micah, gonzales)\n\nnot Barf(micah, gonzales) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The blinny does not chase the ferdie. The blinny does not see the charmane. The charmane is quasi. The charmane is soundable. The charmane overstuff the ferdie. The rudolfo squander the charmane. The rudolfo squander the ferdie. The rudolfo is quasi. The rudolfo is coaxial. The rudolfo overstuff the charmane. The rudolfo overstuff the ferdie. The ferdie squander the charmane. If someone is quasi then they see the charmane. If someone overstuff the rudolfo then the rudolfo emend the blinny. If someone squander the ferdie then the ferdie emend the charmane. If someone squander the rudolfo then they see the blinny. If someone squander the charmane and they are not soundable then the charmane squander the blinny. If someone emend the charmane and they are quasi then the charmane squander the rudolfo. If the blinny is quasi and the blinny overstuff the ferdie then the blinny squander the rudolfo. If the charmane does not chase the blinny and the charmane is not soundable then the charmane overstuff the blinny. The blinny overstuff the charmane.", "logic": "\nnot Squander(blinny, ferdie)\nnot Emend(blinny, charmane)\nQuasi(charmane)\nSoundable(charmane)\nOverstuff(charmane, ferdie)\nSquander(rudolfo, charmane)\nSquander(rudolfo, ferdie)\nQuasi(rudolfo)\nCoaxial(rudolfo)\nOverstuff(rudolfo, charmane)\nOverstuff(rudolfo, ferdie)\nSquander(ferdie, charmane)\nforall x (Quasi(x) -> Emend(x, charmane))\nforall x (Overstuff(x, rudolfo) -> Emend(rudolfo, blinny))\nforall x (Squander(x, ferdie) -> Emend(ferdie, charmane))\nforall x (Squander(x, rudolfo) -> Emend(x, blinny))\nforall x (Squander(x, charmane) and not Soundable(x) -> Squander(charmane, blinny))\nforall x (Emend(x, charmane) and Quasi(x) -> Squander(charmane, rudolfo))\nQuasi(blinny) and Overstuff(blinny, ferdie) -> Squander(blinny, rudolfo)\nnot Squander(charmane, blinny) and not Soundable(charmane) -> Overstuff(charmane, blinny)\n\nOverstuff(blinny, charmane)\n\nOverstuff(blinny, charmane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "Edyth is spouting. Nannie is spouting. Kathi is limacine. All quadruplex, culpable people are spouting. If Kathi is tactless then Kathi is shut. All shut people are culpable. All spouting people are shut. Rough people are quadruplex. If Kathi is shut then Kathi is not culpable. If someone is shut and not culpable then they are spoilable. White people are spoilable. Nannie is spouting.", "logic": "\nSpouting(edyth)\nSpouting(nannie)\nLimacine(kathi)\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) and Culpable(x) -> Spouting(x))\nTactless(kathi) -> Shut(kathi)\nforall x (Shut(x) -> Culpable(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Shut(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\nShut(kathi) -> not Culpable(kathi)\nforall x (Shut(x) and not Culpable(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Spoilable(x))\n\nSpouting(nannie)\n\ntherefore Spouting(nannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Vallie is unpillared. Freddi is unpillared. Stinky is throbbing. All uncurving, sorry people are unpillared. If Stinky is thumbed then Stinky is undershot. All undershot people are sorry. All unpillared people are undershot. Rough people are uncurving. If Stinky is undershot then Stinky is not sorry. If someone is undershot and not sorry then they are footsore. White people are footsore. Vallie is not unpillared.", "logic": "\nUnpillared(vallie)\nUnpillared(freddi)\nThrobbing(stinky)\nforall x (Uncurving(x) and Sorry(x) -> Unpillared(x))\nThumbed(stinky) -> Undershot(stinky)\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> Sorry(x))\nforall x (Unpillared(x) -> Undershot(x))\nforall x (Throbbing(x) -> Uncurving(x))\nUndershot(stinky) -> not Sorry(stinky)\nforall x (Undershot(x) and not Sorry(x) -> Footsore(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) -> Footsore(x))\n\nnot Unpillared(vallie)\n\ntherefore Unpillared(vallie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Nananne is oscine. Arielle is oscine. Ambrosius is immoral. All former, cryogenic people are oscine. If Ambrosius is attentive then Ambrosius is bald. All bald people are cryogenic. All oscine people are bald. Rough people are former. If Ambrosius is bald then Ambrosius is not cryogenic. If someone is bald and not cryogenic then they are oval. White people are oval. Nananne is bald.", "logic": "\nOscine(nananne)\nOscine(arielle)\nImmoral(ambrosius)\nforall x (Former(x) and Cryogenic(x) -> Oscine(x))\nAttentive(ambrosius) -> Bald(ambrosius)\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Immoral(x) -> Former(x))\nBald(ambrosius) -> not Cryogenic(ambrosius)\nforall x (Bald(x) and not Cryogenic(x) -> Oval(x))\nforall x (Cryogenic(x) -> Oval(x))\n\nBald(nananne)\n\nOscine(nananne) and forall x (Oscine(x) -> Bald(x)) -> therefore Bald(nananne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Aleda is callow. Desmond is callow. Rosanne is unbarred. All lepidote, ascendant people are callow. If Rosanne is audacious then Rosanne is crosstown. All crosstown people are ascendant. All callow people are crosstown. Rough people are lepidote. If Rosanne is crosstown then Rosanne is not ascendant. If someone is crosstown and not ascendant then they are eristical. White people are eristical. Desmond is not crosstown.", "logic": "\nCallow(aleda)\nCallow(desmond)\nUnbarred(rosanne)\nforall x (Lepidote(x) and Ascendant(x) -> Callow(x))\nAudacious(rosanne) -> Crosstown(rosanne)\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> Ascendant(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Lepidote(x))\nCrosstown(rosanne) -> not Ascendant(rosanne)\nforall x (Crosstown(x) and not Ascendant(x) -> Eristical(x))\nforall x (Ascendant(x) -> Eristical(x))\n\nnot Crosstown(desmond)\n\nCallow(desmond) and forall x (Callow(x) -> Crosstown(x)) -> therefore Crosstown(desmond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Kalinda is bilateral. Emilee is bilateral. Barth is nonthermal. All dogmatical, qatari people are bilateral. If Barth is devoid then Barth is permed. All permed people are qatari. All bilateral people are permed. Rough people are dogmatical. If Barth is permed then Barth is not qatari. If someone is permed and not qatari then they are combined. White people are combined. Emilee is qatari.", "logic": "\nBilateral(kalinda)\nBilateral(emilee)\nNonthermal(barth)\nforall x (Dogmatical(x) and Qatari(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nDevoid(barth) -> Permed(barth)\nforall x (Permed(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Permed(x))\nforall x (Nonthermal(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\nPermed(barth) -> not Qatari(barth)\nforall x (Permed(x) and not Qatari(x) -> Combined(x))\nforall x (Qatari(x) -> Combined(x))\n\nQatari(emilee)\n\nBilateral(emilee) and forall x (Bilateral(x) -> Permed(x)) -> therefore Permed(emilee) Permed(emilee) and forall x (Permed(x) -> Qatari(x)) -> therefore Qatari(emilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Adel is going. Connor is going. Roanna is transpolar. All consolable, biblical people are going. If Roanna is sandalled then Roanna is adaptable. All adaptable people are biblical. All going people are adaptable. Rough people are consolable. If Roanna is adaptable then Roanna is not biblical. If someone is adaptable and not biblical then they are couthy. White people are couthy. Adel is not biblical.", "logic": "\nGoing(adel)\nGoing(connor)\nTranspolar(roanna)\nforall x (Consolable(x) and Biblical(x) -> Going(x))\nSandalled(roanna) -> Adaptable(roanna)\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Biblical(x))\nforall x (Going(x) -> Adaptable(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> Consolable(x))\nAdaptable(roanna) -> not Biblical(roanna)\nforall x (Adaptable(x) and not Biblical(x) -> Couthy(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) -> Couthy(x))\n\nnot Biblical(adel)\n\nGoing(adel) and forall x (Going(x) -> Adaptable(x)) -> therefore Adaptable(adel) Adaptable(adel) and forall x (Adaptable(x) -> Biblical(x)) -> therefore Biblical(adel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Hanny is scrivened. Etty is scrivened. Hal is memberless. All befogged, average people are scrivened. If Hal is stochastic then Hal is inadequate. All inadequate people are average. All scrivened people are inadequate. Rough people are befogged. If Hal is inadequate then Hal is not average. If someone is inadequate and not average then they are surgical. White people are surgical. Hanny is surgical.", "logic": "\nScrivened(hanny)\nScrivened(etty)\nMemberless(hal)\nforall x (Befogged(x) and Average(x) -> Scrivened(x))\nStochastic(hal) -> Inadequate(hal)\nforall x (Inadequate(x) -> Average(x))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Inadequate(x))\nforall x (Memberless(x) -> Befogged(x))\nInadequate(hal) -> not Average(hal)\nforall x (Inadequate(x) and not Average(x) -> Surgical(x))\nforall x (Average(x) -> Surgical(x))\n\nSurgical(hanny)\n\nScrivened(hanny) and forall x (Scrivened(x) -> Inadequate(x)) -> therefore Inadequate(hanny) Inadequate(hanny) and forall x (Inadequate(x) -> Average(x)) -> therefore Average(hanny) Average(hanny) and forall x (Average(x) -> Surgical(x)) -> therefore Surgical(hanny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Ethan is bourgeois. Dona is bourgeois. Ritch is maniac. All scabrous, flavourful people are bourgeois. If Ritch is maiden then Ritch is incensed. All incensed people are flavourful. All bourgeois people are incensed. Rough people are scabrous. If Ritch is incensed then Ritch is not flavourful. If someone is incensed and not flavourful then they are insatiate. White people are insatiate. Dona is not insatiate.", "logic": "\nBourgeois(ethan)\nBourgeois(dona)\nManiac(ritch)\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Flavourful(x) -> Bourgeois(x))\nMaiden(ritch) -> Incensed(ritch)\nforall x (Incensed(x) -> Flavourful(x))\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) -> Incensed(x))\nforall x (Maniac(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nIncensed(ritch) -> not Flavourful(ritch)\nforall x (Incensed(x) and not Flavourful(x) -> Insatiate(x))\nforall x (Flavourful(x) -> Insatiate(x))\n\nnot Insatiate(dona)\n\nBourgeois(dona) and forall x (Bourgeois(x) -> Incensed(x)) -> therefore Incensed(dona) Incensed(dona) and forall x (Incensed(x) -> Flavourful(x)) -> therefore Flavourful(dona) Flavourful(dona) and forall x (Flavourful(x) -> Insatiate(x)) -> therefore Insatiate(dona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Roxana is gingery. Gil is gingery. Tre is pouched. All atlantic, biotic people are gingery. If Tre is tested then Tre is outrageous. All outrageous people are biotic. All gingery people are outrageous. Rough people are atlantic. If Tre is outrageous then Tre is not biotic. If someone is outrageous and not biotic then they are expiable. White people are expiable. Tre is not expiable.", "logic": "\nGingery(roxana)\nGingery(gil)\nPouched(tre)\nforall x (Atlantic(x) and Biotic(x) -> Gingery(x))\nTested(tre) -> Outrageous(tre)\nforall x (Outrageous(x) -> Biotic(x))\nforall x (Gingery(x) -> Outrageous(x))\nforall x (Pouched(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nOutrageous(tre) -> not Biotic(tre)\nforall x (Outrageous(x) and not Biotic(x) -> Expiable(x))\nforall x (Biotic(x) -> Expiable(x))\n\nnot Expiable(tre)\n\nforall x (Biotic(x) -> Expiable(x)) <- forall x (Outrageous(x) -> Biotic(x)) <- forall x (Gingery(x) -> Outrageous(x)) <- forall x (Atlantic(x) and Biotic(x) -> Gingery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Tracee is rustproof. Albert is rustproof. Selig is exegetic. All immortal, rainproof people are rustproof. If Selig is auric then Selig is genital. All genital people are rainproof. All rustproof people are genital. Rough people are immortal. If Selig is genital then Selig is not rainproof. If someone is genital and not rainproof then they are cotyloid. White people are cotyloid. Selig is genital.", "logic": "\nRustproof(tracee)\nRustproof(albert)\nExegetic(selig)\nforall x (Immortal(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Rustproof(x))\nAuric(selig) -> Genital(selig)\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Rainproof(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Genital(x))\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Immortal(x))\nGenital(selig) -> not Rainproof(selig)\nforall x (Genital(x) and not Rainproof(x) -> Cotyloid(x))\nforall x (Rainproof(x) -> Cotyloid(x))\n\nGenital(selig)\n\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Genital(x)) <- forall x (Immortal(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Rustproof(x)) <- forall x (Genital(x) -> Rainproof(x)) <- Auric(selig) -> Genital(selig) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Wilbur is sigmoid. Mommy is sigmoid. Robbie is married. All bitterish, untagged people are sigmoid. If Robbie is titled then Robbie is corbelled. All corbelled people are untagged. All sigmoid people are corbelled. Rough people are bitterish. If Robbie is corbelled then Robbie is not untagged. If someone is corbelled and not untagged then they are phony. White people are phony. Mommy is not bitterish.", "logic": "\nSigmoid(wilbur)\nSigmoid(mommy)\nMarried(robbie)\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and Untagged(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nTitled(robbie) -> Corbelled(robbie)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Untagged(x))\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Married(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nCorbelled(robbie) -> not Untagged(robbie)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) and not Untagged(x) -> Phony(x))\nforall x (Untagged(x) -> Phony(x))\n\nnot Bitterish(mommy)\n\nforall x (Married(x) -> Bitterish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Amalee is ominous. Bruce is ominous. Nerita is shrewish. All caulescent, sorrowful people are ominous. If Nerita is exultant then Nerita is vermillion. All vermillion people are sorrowful. All ominous people are vermillion. Rough people are caulescent. If Nerita is vermillion then Nerita is not sorrowful. If someone is vermillion and not sorrowful then they are stunned. White people are stunned. Nerita is sorrowful.", "logic": "\nOminous(amalee)\nOminous(bruce)\nShrewish(nerita)\nforall x (Caulescent(x) and Sorrowful(x) -> Ominous(x))\nExultant(nerita) -> Vermillion(nerita)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Sorrowful(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Shrewish(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nVermillion(nerita) -> not Sorrowful(nerita)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) and not Sorrowful(x) -> Stunned(x))\nforall x (Sorrowful(x) -> Stunned(x))\n\nSorrowful(nerita)\n\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Sorrowful(x)) <- forall x (Ominous(x) -> Vermillion(x)) <- forall x (Caulescent(x) and Sorrowful(x) -> Ominous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Stefanie is gammy. Lorraine is gammy. Sabine is sound. All sumatran, appetising people are gammy. If Sabine is trivial then Sabine is teasing. All teasing people are appetising. All gammy people are teasing. Rough people are sumatran. If Sabine is teasing then Sabine is not appetising. If someone is teasing and not appetising then they are stilted. White people are stilted. Stefanie is not trivial.", "logic": "\nGammy(stefanie)\nGammy(lorraine)\nSound(sabine)\nforall x (Sumatran(x) and Appetising(x) -> Gammy(x))\nTrivial(sabine) -> Teasing(sabine)\nforall x (Teasing(x) -> Appetising(x))\nforall x (Gammy(x) -> Teasing(x))\nforall x (Sound(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nTeasing(sabine) -> not Appetising(sabine)\nforall x (Teasing(x) and not Appetising(x) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Stilted(x))\n\nnot Trivial(stefanie)\n\nnot Trivial(stefanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Harmonie is gruelling. Nichol is gruelling. Carol is femoral. All handed, intoned people are gruelling. If Carol is vowellike then Carol is plumbous. All plumbous people are intoned. All gruelling people are plumbous. Rough people are handed. If Carol is plumbous then Carol is not intoned. If someone is plumbous and not intoned then they are gangly. White people are gangly. Nichol is vowellike.", "logic": "\nGruelling(harmonie)\nGruelling(nichol)\nFemoral(carol)\nforall x (Handed(x) and Intoned(x) -> Gruelling(x))\nVowellike(carol) -> Plumbous(carol)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) -> Intoned(x))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Handed(x))\nPlumbous(carol) -> not Intoned(carol)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and not Intoned(x) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Intoned(x) -> Gangly(x))\n\nVowellike(nichol)\n\nVowellike(nichol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Lynn is jungly. Clemens is jungly. Jerzy is rightful. All chalky, ravening people are jungly. If Jerzy is inclement then Jerzy is vietnamese. All vietnamese people are ravening. All jungly people are vietnamese. Rough people are chalky. If Jerzy is vietnamese then Jerzy is not ravening. If someone is vietnamese and not ravening then they are delayed. White people are delayed. Clemens is not rightful.", "logic": "\nJungly(lynn)\nJungly(clemens)\nRightful(jerzy)\nforall x (Chalky(x) and Ravening(x) -> Jungly(x))\nInclement(jerzy) -> Vietnamese(jerzy)\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) -> Ravening(x))\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Vietnamese(x))\nforall x (Rightful(x) -> Chalky(x))\nVietnamese(jerzy) -> not Ravening(jerzy)\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) and not Ravening(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Ravening(x) -> Delayed(x))\n\nnot Rightful(clemens)\n\nnot Rightful(clemens) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Gearard is lightproof. Eugine is lightproof. Tonia is overshot. All prolate, dyspneic people are lightproof. If Tonia is azido then Tonia is harassed. All harassed people are dyspneic. All lightproof people are harassed. Rough people are prolate. If Tonia is harassed then Tonia is not dyspneic. If someone is harassed and not dyspneic then they are actable. White people are actable. Gearard is overshot.", "logic": "\nLightproof(gearard)\nLightproof(eugine)\nOvershot(tonia)\nforall x (Prolate(x) and Dyspneic(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nAzido(tonia) -> Harassed(tonia)\nforall x (Harassed(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Harassed(x))\nforall x (Overshot(x) -> Prolate(x))\nHarassed(tonia) -> not Dyspneic(tonia)\nforall x (Harassed(x) and not Dyspneic(x) -> Actable(x))\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) -> Actable(x))\n\nOvershot(gearard)\n\nOvershot(gearard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Rog is aeriform. If Rog is genital then Rog is chuffed. If Rog is jaded then Rog is chuffed. If someone is aeriform and genital then they are chuffed. If someone is aeriform then they are genital. If someone is chuffed then they are not towering. If someone is chuffed and not towering then they are thyroidal. Rog is aeriform.", "logic": "\nAeriform(rog)\nGenital(rog) -> Chuffed(rog)\nJaded(rog) -> Chuffed(rog)\nforall x (Aeriform(x) and Genital(x) -> Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Genital(x))\nforall x (Chuffed(x) -> not Towering(x))\nforall x (Chuffed(x) and not Towering(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\n\nAeriform(rog)\n\ntherefore Aeriform(rog)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Merill is untilled. If Merill is downfield then Merill is cloddish. If Merill is typical then Merill is cloddish. If someone is untilled and downfield then they are cloddish. If someone is untilled then they are downfield. If someone is cloddish then they are not untypical. If someone is cloddish and not untypical then they are humped. Merill is not untilled.", "logic": "\nUntilled(merill)\nDownfield(merill) -> Cloddish(merill)\nTypical(merill) -> Cloddish(merill)\nforall x (Untilled(x) and Downfield(x) -> Cloddish(x))\nforall x (Untilled(x) -> Downfield(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> not Untypical(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) and not Untypical(x) -> Humped(x))\n\nnot Untilled(merill)\n\ntherefore Untilled(merill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Lucian is tigerish. If Lucian is florentine then Lucian is unsanded. If Lucian is branching then Lucian is unsanded. If someone is tigerish and florentine then they are unsanded. If someone is tigerish then they are florentine. If someone is unsanded then they are not innoxious. If someone is unsanded and not innoxious then they are latent. Lucian is florentine.", "logic": "\nTigerish(lucian)\nFlorentine(lucian) -> Unsanded(lucian)\nBranching(lucian) -> Unsanded(lucian)\nforall x (Tigerish(x) and Florentine(x) -> Unsanded(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) -> not Innoxious(x))\nforall x (Unsanded(x) and not Innoxious(x) -> Latent(x))\n\nFlorentine(lucian)\n\nTigerish(lucian) and forall x (Tigerish(x) -> Florentine(x)) -> therefore Florentine(lucian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Jedediah is precocial. If Jedediah is upstage then Jedediah is perceptive. If Jedediah is optic then Jedediah is perceptive. If someone is precocial and upstage then they are perceptive. If someone is precocial then they are upstage. If someone is perceptive then they are not volar. If someone is perceptive and not volar then they are bumbling. Jedediah is not upstage.", "logic": "\nPrecocial(jedediah)\nUpstage(jedediah) -> Perceptive(jedediah)\nOptic(jedediah) -> Perceptive(jedediah)\nforall x (Precocial(x) and Upstage(x) -> Perceptive(x))\nforall x (Precocial(x) -> Upstage(x))\nforall x (Perceptive(x) -> not Volar(x))\nforall x (Perceptive(x) and not Volar(x) -> Bumbling(x))\n\nnot Upstage(jedediah)\n\nPrecocial(jedediah) and forall x (Precocial(x) -> Upstage(x)) -> therefore Upstage(jedediah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Mellisa is discordant. If Mellisa is pricey then Mellisa is imperative. If Mellisa is absorbable then Mellisa is imperative. If someone is discordant and pricey then they are imperative. If someone is discordant then they are pricey. If someone is imperative then they are not pubescent. If someone is imperative and not pubescent then they are vulval. Mellisa is imperative.", "logic": "\nDiscordant(mellisa)\nPricey(mellisa) -> Imperative(mellisa)\nAbsorbable(mellisa) -> Imperative(mellisa)\nforall x (Discordant(x) and Pricey(x) -> Imperative(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> Pricey(x))\nforall x (Imperative(x) -> not Pubescent(x))\nforall x (Imperative(x) and not Pubescent(x) -> Vulval(x))\n\nImperative(mellisa)\n\nDiscordant(mellisa) and forall x (Discordant(x) -> Pricey(x)) -> therefore Pricey(mellisa) Pricey(mellisa) and Pricey(mellisa) -> Imperative(mellisa) -> therefore Imperative(mellisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Kordula is detonative. If Kordula is huxleian then Kordula is ramate. If Kordula is aired then Kordula is ramate. If someone is detonative and huxleian then they are ramate. If someone is detonative then they are huxleian. If someone is ramate then they are not aural. If someone is ramate and not aural then they are amoeboid. Kordula is not ramate.", "logic": "\nDetonative(kordula)\nHuxleian(kordula) -> Ramate(kordula)\nAired(kordula) -> Ramate(kordula)\nforall x (Detonative(x) and Huxleian(x) -> Ramate(x))\nforall x (Detonative(x) -> Huxleian(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> not Aural(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) and not Aural(x) -> Amoeboid(x))\n\nnot Ramate(kordula)\n\nDetonative(kordula) and forall x (Detonative(x) -> Huxleian(x)) -> therefore Huxleian(kordula) Huxleian(kordula) and Huxleian(kordula) -> Ramate(kordula) -> therefore Ramate(kordula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Donella is ethiopian. If Donella is lxxv then Donella is musty. If Donella is xlii then Donella is musty. If someone is ethiopian and lxxv then they are musty. If someone is ethiopian then they are lxxv. If someone is musty then they are not rightful. If someone is musty and not rightful then they are jowly. Donella is not rightful.", "logic": "\nEthiopian(donella)\nLxxv(donella) -> Musty(donella)\nXlii(donella) -> Musty(donella)\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) and Lxxv(x) -> Musty(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Lxxv(x))\nforall x (Musty(x) -> not Rightful(x))\nforall x (Musty(x) and not Rightful(x) -> Jowly(x))\n\nnot Rightful(donella)\n\nEthiopian(donella) and forall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Lxxv(x)) -> therefore Lxxv(donella) Lxxv(donella) and Lxxv(donella) -> Musty(donella) -> therefore Musty(donella) Musty(donella) and forall x (Musty(x) -> not Rightful(x)) -> therefore not Rightful(donella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Dom is asinine. If Dom is narcotized then Dom is weeping. If Dom is seasonal then Dom is weeping. If someone is asinine and narcotized then they are weeping. If someone is asinine then they are narcotized. If someone is weeping then they are not immunized. If someone is weeping and not immunized then they are seasoned. Dom is immunized.", "logic": "\nAsinine(dom)\nNarcotized(dom) -> Weeping(dom)\nSeasonal(dom) -> Weeping(dom)\nforall x (Asinine(x) and Narcotized(x) -> Weeping(x))\nforall x (Asinine(x) -> Narcotized(x))\nforall x (Weeping(x) -> not Immunized(x))\nforall x (Weeping(x) and not Immunized(x) -> Seasoned(x))\n\nImmunized(dom)\n\nAsinine(dom) and forall x (Asinine(x) -> Narcotized(x)) -> therefore Narcotized(dom) Narcotized(dom) and Narcotized(dom) -> Weeping(dom) -> therefore Weeping(dom) Weeping(dom) and forall x (Weeping(x) -> not Immunized(x)) -> therefore not Immunized(dom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Marven is uninviting. If Marven is parochial then Marven is sweetish. If Marven is ulcerated then Marven is sweetish. If someone is uninviting and parochial then they are sweetish. If someone is uninviting then they are parochial. If someone is sweetish then they are not inhibitory. If someone is sweetish and not inhibitory then they are unordered. Marven is not ulcerated.", "logic": "\nUninviting(marven)\nParochial(marven) -> Sweetish(marven)\nUlcerated(marven) -> Sweetish(marven)\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Parochial(x) -> Sweetish(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> Parochial(x))\nforall x (Sweetish(x) -> not Inhibitory(x))\nforall x (Sweetish(x) and not Inhibitory(x) -> Unordered(x))\n\nnot Ulcerated(marven)\n\nnot Ulcerated(marven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Bing is eatable. If Bing is domed then Bing is prurient. If Bing is armoured then Bing is prurient. If someone is eatable and domed then they are prurient. If someone is eatable then they are domed. If someone is prurient then they are not rigged. If someone is prurient and not rigged then they are grey. Bing is round.", "logic": "\nEatable(bing)\nDomed(bing) -> Prurient(bing)\nArmoured(bing) -> Prurient(bing)\nforall x (Eatable(x) and Domed(x) -> Prurient(x))\nforall x (Eatable(x) -> Domed(x))\nforall x (Prurient(x) -> not Rigged(x))\nforall x (Prurient(x) and not Rigged(x) -> Grey(x))\n\nRound(bing)\n\nRound(bing) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Micky is mystical. Micky is olden. Tressa is unethical. Tressa is unanimous. Tressa is uncarved. Tressa is lxxxv. Tressa is mystical. Tressa is not agrologic. Abagael is agrologic. Whitney is unethical. Whitney is unanimous. Whitney is uncarved. Whitney is not lxxxv. Whitney is mystical. Whitney is olden. If Abagael is not olden then Abagael is not mystical. If Tressa is mystical and Tressa is unanimous then Tressa is not agrologic. Quiet, uncarved people are unethical. All olden people are unethical. Smart people are unethical. All unanimous, mystical people are not agrologic. If someone is agrologic and not mystical then they are unanimous. If someone is unethical then they are unanimous. Whitney is unethical.", "logic": "\nMystical(micky)\nOlden(micky)\nUnethical(tressa)\nUnanimous(tressa)\nUncarved(tressa)\nLxxxv(tressa)\nMystical(tressa)\nnot Agrologic(tressa)\nAgrologic(abagael)\nUnethical(whitney)\nUnanimous(whitney)\nUncarved(whitney)\nnot Lxxxv(whitney)\nMystical(whitney)\nOlden(whitney)\nnot Olden(abagael) -> not Mystical(abagael)\nMystical(tressa) and Unanimous(tressa) -> not Agrologic(tressa)\nforall x (Mystical(x) and Uncarved(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Olden(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Agrologic(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Unanimous(x) and Mystical(x) -> not Agrologic(x))\nforall x (Agrologic(x) and not Mystical(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nforall x (Unethical(x) -> Unanimous(x))\n\nUnethical(whitney)\n\ntherefore Unethical(whitney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Sean is somnific. Sean is swart. Isidore is honeyed. Isidore is clawlike. Isidore is dandified. Isidore is diffusive. Isidore is somnific. Isidore is not searing. Trent is searing. Ardenia is honeyed. Ardenia is clawlike. Ardenia is dandified. Ardenia is not diffusive. Ardenia is somnific. Ardenia is swart. If Trent is not swart then Trent is not somnific. If Isidore is somnific and Isidore is clawlike then Isidore is not searing. Quiet, dandified people are honeyed. All swart people are honeyed. Smart people are honeyed. All clawlike, somnific people are not searing. If someone is searing and not somnific then they are clawlike. If someone is honeyed then they are clawlike. Isidore is not somnific.", "logic": "\nSomnific(sean)\nSwart(sean)\nHoneyed(isidore)\nClawlike(isidore)\nDandified(isidore)\nDiffusive(isidore)\nSomnific(isidore)\nnot Searing(isidore)\nSearing(trent)\nHoneyed(ardenia)\nClawlike(ardenia)\nDandified(ardenia)\nnot Diffusive(ardenia)\nSomnific(ardenia)\nSwart(ardenia)\nnot Swart(trent) -> not Somnific(trent)\nSomnific(isidore) and Clawlike(isidore) -> not Searing(isidore)\nforall x (Somnific(x) and Dandified(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Swart(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and Somnific(x) -> not Searing(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) and not Somnific(x) -> Clawlike(x))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) -> Clawlike(x))\n\nnot Somnific(isidore)\n\ntherefore Somnific(isidore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Izak is harried. Izak is horrible. Nicholle is blabby. Nicholle is antigenic. Nicholle is unvoiced. Nicholle is undercover. Nicholle is harried. Nicholle is not unscathed. Dorie is unscathed. Kerianne is blabby. Kerianne is antigenic. Kerianne is unvoiced. Kerianne is not undercover. Kerianne is harried. Kerianne is horrible. If Dorie is not horrible then Dorie is not harried. If Nicholle is harried and Nicholle is antigenic then Nicholle is not unscathed. Quiet, unvoiced people are blabby. All horrible people are blabby. Smart people are blabby. All antigenic, harried people are not unscathed. If someone is unscathed and not harried then they are antigenic. If someone is blabby then they are antigenic. Kerianne is not unscathed.", "logic": "\nHarried(izak)\nHorrible(izak)\nBlabby(nicholle)\nAntigenic(nicholle)\nUnvoiced(nicholle)\nUndercover(nicholle)\nHarried(nicholle)\nnot Unscathed(nicholle)\nUnscathed(dorie)\nBlabby(kerianne)\nAntigenic(kerianne)\nUnvoiced(kerianne)\nnot Undercover(kerianne)\nHarried(kerianne)\nHorrible(kerianne)\nnot Horrible(dorie) -> not Harried(dorie)\nHarried(nicholle) and Antigenic(nicholle) -> not Unscathed(nicholle)\nforall x (Harried(x) and Unvoiced(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Horrible(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Unscathed(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Antigenic(x) and Harried(x) -> not Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Unscathed(x) and not Harried(x) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Blabby(x) -> Antigenic(x))\n\nnot Unscathed(kerianne)\n\nAntigenic(kerianne) and Harried(kerianne) and forall x (Antigenic(x) and Harried(x) -> not Unscathed(x)) -> therefore not Unscathed(kerianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Natassia is inerrant. Natassia is coniferous. Kizzee is sabahan. Kizzee is convivial. Kizzee is dynastic. Kizzee is ulcerated. Kizzee is inerrant. Kizzee is not bucolic. Carlynne is bucolic. Gilbert is sabahan. Gilbert is convivial. Gilbert is dynastic. Gilbert is not ulcerated. Gilbert is inerrant. Gilbert is coniferous. If Carlynne is not coniferous then Carlynne is not inerrant. If Kizzee is inerrant and Kizzee is convivial then Kizzee is not bucolic. Quiet, dynastic people are sabahan. All coniferous people are sabahan. Smart people are sabahan. All convivial, inerrant people are not bucolic. If someone is bucolic and not inerrant then they are convivial. If someone is sabahan then they are convivial. Gilbert is bucolic.", "logic": "\nInerrant(natassia)\nConiferous(natassia)\nSabahan(kizzee)\nConvivial(kizzee)\nDynastic(kizzee)\nUlcerated(kizzee)\nInerrant(kizzee)\nnot Bucolic(kizzee)\nBucolic(carlynne)\nSabahan(gilbert)\nConvivial(gilbert)\nDynastic(gilbert)\nnot Ulcerated(gilbert)\nInerrant(gilbert)\nConiferous(gilbert)\nnot Coniferous(carlynne) -> not Inerrant(carlynne)\nInerrant(kizzee) and Convivial(kizzee) -> not Bucolic(kizzee)\nforall x (Inerrant(x) and Dynastic(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Bucolic(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Convivial(x) and Inerrant(x) -> not Bucolic(x))\nforall x (Bucolic(x) and not Inerrant(x) -> Convivial(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) -> Convivial(x))\n\nBucolic(gilbert)\n\nConvivial(gilbert) and Inerrant(gilbert) and forall x (Convivial(x) and Inerrant(x) -> not Bucolic(x)) -> therefore not Bucolic(gilbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Munmro is devoted. Munmro is gross. Cassey is ecuadorian. Cassey is avascular. Cassey is agog. Cassey is spent. Cassey is devoted. Cassey is not weather. Rahel is weather. Vivyanne is ecuadorian. Vivyanne is avascular. Vivyanne is agog. Vivyanne is not spent. Vivyanne is devoted. Vivyanne is gross. If Rahel is not gross then Rahel is not devoted. If Cassey is devoted and Cassey is avascular then Cassey is not weather. Quiet, agog people are ecuadorian. All gross people are ecuadorian. Smart people are ecuadorian. All avascular, devoted people are not weather. If someone is weather and not devoted then they are avascular. If someone is ecuadorian then they are avascular. Munmro is avascular.", "logic": "\nDevoted(munmro)\nGross(munmro)\nEcuadorian(cassey)\nAvascular(cassey)\nAgog(cassey)\nSpent(cassey)\nDevoted(cassey)\nnot Weather(cassey)\nWeather(rahel)\nEcuadorian(vivyanne)\nAvascular(vivyanne)\nAgog(vivyanne)\nnot Spent(vivyanne)\nDevoted(vivyanne)\nGross(vivyanne)\nnot Gross(rahel) -> not Devoted(rahel)\nDevoted(cassey) and Avascular(cassey) -> not Weather(cassey)\nforall x (Devoted(x) and Agog(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\nforall x (Avascular(x) and Devoted(x) -> not Weather(x))\nforall x (Weather(x) and not Devoted(x) -> Avascular(x))\nforall x (Ecuadorian(x) -> Avascular(x))\n\nAvascular(munmro)\n\nGross(munmro) and forall x (Gross(x) -> Ecuadorian(x)) -> therefore Ecuadorian(munmro) Ecuadorian(munmro) and forall x (Ecuadorian(x) -> Avascular(x)) -> therefore Avascular(munmro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Ladonna is subliminal. Ladonna is bespoke. Peyter is able. Peyter is aerial. Peyter is fatigued. Peyter is novel. Peyter is subliminal. Peyter is not prussian. Emmalynn is prussian. Mikhail is able. Mikhail is aerial. Mikhail is fatigued. Mikhail is not novel. Mikhail is subliminal. Mikhail is bespoke. If Emmalynn is not bespoke then Emmalynn is not subliminal. If Peyter is subliminal and Peyter is aerial then Peyter is not prussian. Quiet, fatigued people are able. All bespoke people are able. Smart people are able. All aerial, subliminal people are not prussian. If someone is prussian and not subliminal then they are aerial. If someone is able then they are aerial. Ladonna is not aerial.", "logic": "\nSubliminal(ladonna)\nBespoke(ladonna)\nAble(peyter)\nAerial(peyter)\nFatigued(peyter)\nNovel(peyter)\nSubliminal(peyter)\nnot Prussian(peyter)\nPrussian(emmalynn)\nAble(mikhail)\nAerial(mikhail)\nFatigued(mikhail)\nnot Novel(mikhail)\nSubliminal(mikhail)\nBespoke(mikhail)\nnot Bespoke(emmalynn) -> not Subliminal(emmalynn)\nSubliminal(peyter) and Aerial(peyter) -> not Prussian(peyter)\nforall x (Subliminal(x) and Fatigued(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Bespoke(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Aerial(x) and Subliminal(x) -> not Prussian(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) and not Subliminal(x) -> Aerial(x))\nforall x (Able(x) -> Aerial(x))\n\nnot Aerial(ladonna)\n\nBespoke(ladonna) and forall x (Bespoke(x) -> Able(x)) -> therefore Able(ladonna) Able(ladonna) and forall x (Able(x) -> Aerial(x)) -> therefore Aerial(ladonna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Paulo is untaught. Paulo is botanic. Thebault is straggly. Thebault is expansible. Thebault is twopenny. Thebault is thundery. Thebault is untaught. Thebault is not detersive. Leonelle is detersive. Darcee is straggly. Darcee is expansible. Darcee is twopenny. Darcee is not thundery. Darcee is untaught. Darcee is botanic. If Leonelle is not botanic then Leonelle is not untaught. If Thebault is untaught and Thebault is expansible then Thebault is not detersive. Quiet, twopenny people are straggly. All botanic people are straggly. Smart people are straggly. All expansible, untaught people are not detersive. If someone is detersive and not untaught then they are expansible. If someone is straggly then they are expansible. Paulo is not detersive.", "logic": "\nUntaught(paulo)\nBotanic(paulo)\nStraggly(thebault)\nExpansible(thebault)\nTwopenny(thebault)\nThundery(thebault)\nUntaught(thebault)\nnot Detersive(thebault)\nDetersive(leonelle)\nStraggly(darcee)\nExpansible(darcee)\nTwopenny(darcee)\nnot Thundery(darcee)\nUntaught(darcee)\nBotanic(darcee)\nnot Botanic(leonelle) -> not Untaught(leonelle)\nUntaught(thebault) and Expansible(thebault) -> not Detersive(thebault)\nforall x (Untaught(x) and Twopenny(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Botanic(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) and Untaught(x) -> not Detersive(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) and not Untaught(x) -> Expansible(x))\nforall x (Straggly(x) -> Expansible(x))\n\nnot Detersive(paulo)\n\nBotanic(paulo) and forall x (Botanic(x) -> Straggly(x)) -> therefore Straggly(paulo) Straggly(paulo) and forall x (Straggly(x) -> Expansible(x)) -> therefore Expansible(paulo) Expansible(paulo) and Untaught(paulo) and forall x (Expansible(x) and Untaught(x) -> not Detersive(x)) -> therefore not Detersive(paulo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Nadiya is inviolable. Nadiya is semiotic. Jaquith is fierce. Jaquith is lukewarm. Jaquith is pockmarked. Jaquith is graded. Jaquith is inviolable. Jaquith is not gumptious. Suki is gumptious. Herold is fierce. Herold is lukewarm. Herold is pockmarked. Herold is not graded. Herold is inviolable. Herold is semiotic. If Suki is not semiotic then Suki is not inviolable. If Jaquith is inviolable and Jaquith is lukewarm then Jaquith is not gumptious. Quiet, pockmarked people are fierce. All semiotic people are fierce. Smart people are fierce. All lukewarm, inviolable people are not gumptious. If someone is gumptious and not inviolable then they are lukewarm. If someone is fierce then they are lukewarm. Nadiya is gumptious.", "logic": "\nInviolable(nadiya)\nSemiotic(nadiya)\nFierce(jaquith)\nLukewarm(jaquith)\nPockmarked(jaquith)\nGraded(jaquith)\nInviolable(jaquith)\nnot Gumptious(jaquith)\nGumptious(suki)\nFierce(herold)\nLukewarm(herold)\nPockmarked(herold)\nnot Graded(herold)\nInviolable(herold)\nSemiotic(herold)\nnot Semiotic(suki) -> not Inviolable(suki)\nInviolable(jaquith) and Lukewarm(jaquith) -> not Gumptious(jaquith)\nforall x (Inviolable(x) and Pockmarked(x) -> Fierce(x))\nforall x (Semiotic(x) -> Fierce(x))\nforall x (Gumptious(x) -> Fierce(x))\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) and Inviolable(x) -> not Gumptious(x))\nforall x (Gumptious(x) and not Inviolable(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\nforall x (Fierce(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\n\nGumptious(nadiya)\n\nSemiotic(nadiya) and forall x (Semiotic(x) -> Fierce(x)) -> therefore Fierce(nadiya) Fierce(nadiya) and forall x (Fierce(x) -> Lukewarm(x)) -> therefore Lukewarm(nadiya) Lukewarm(nadiya) and Inviolable(nadiya) and forall x (Lukewarm(x) and Inviolable(x) -> not Gumptious(x)) -> therefore not Gumptious(nadiya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Hari is sweetheart. Hari is polish. Priscilla is mobbish. Priscilla is sliced. Priscilla is axial. Priscilla is spastic. Priscilla is sweetheart. Priscilla is not grayish. Alys is grayish. Bonnee is mobbish. Bonnee is sliced. Bonnee is axial. Bonnee is not spastic. Bonnee is sweetheart. Bonnee is polish. If Alys is not polish then Alys is not sweetheart. If Priscilla is sweetheart and Priscilla is sliced then Priscilla is not grayish. Quiet, axial people are mobbish. All polish people are mobbish. Smart people are mobbish. All sliced, sweetheart people are not grayish. If someone is grayish and not sweetheart then they are sliced. If someone is mobbish then they are sliced. Alys is not sweetheart.", "logic": "\nSweetheart(hari)\nPolish(hari)\nMobbish(priscilla)\nSliced(priscilla)\nAxial(priscilla)\nSpastic(priscilla)\nSweetheart(priscilla)\nnot Grayish(priscilla)\nGrayish(alys)\nMobbish(bonnee)\nSliced(bonnee)\nAxial(bonnee)\nnot Spastic(bonnee)\nSweetheart(bonnee)\nPolish(bonnee)\nnot Polish(alys) -> not Sweetheart(alys)\nSweetheart(priscilla) and Sliced(priscilla) -> not Grayish(priscilla)\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) and Axial(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Grayish(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Sliced(x) and Sweetheart(x) -> not Grayish(x))\nforall x (Grayish(x) and not Sweetheart(x) -> Sliced(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) -> Sliced(x))\n\nnot Sweetheart(alys)\n\nnot Sweetheart(alys) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Annalee is captive. Annalee is rightish. Erick is republican. Erick is millennial. Erick is terrifying. Erick is blighted. Erick is captive. Erick is not anoestrous. Debee is anoestrous. Rhodie is republican. Rhodie is millennial. Rhodie is terrifying. Rhodie is not blighted. Rhodie is captive. Rhodie is rightish. If Debee is not rightish then Debee is not captive. If Erick is captive and Erick is millennial then Erick is not anoestrous. Quiet, terrifying people are republican. All rightish people are republican. Smart people are republican. All millennial, captive people are not anoestrous. If someone is anoestrous and not captive then they are millennial. If someone is republican then they are millennial. Erick is rightish.", "logic": "\nCaptive(annalee)\nRightish(annalee)\nRepublican(erick)\nMillennial(erick)\nTerrifying(erick)\nBlighted(erick)\nCaptive(erick)\nnot Anoestrous(erick)\nAnoestrous(debee)\nRepublican(rhodie)\nMillennial(rhodie)\nTerrifying(rhodie)\nnot Blighted(rhodie)\nCaptive(rhodie)\nRightish(rhodie)\nnot Rightish(debee) -> not Captive(debee)\nCaptive(erick) and Millennial(erick) -> not Anoestrous(erick)\nforall x (Captive(x) and Terrifying(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Millennial(x) and Captive(x) -> not Anoestrous(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and not Captive(x) -> Millennial(x))\nforall x (Republican(x) -> Millennial(x))\n\nRightish(erick)\n\nRightish(erick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Beverie is sciolistic. Beverie is kosher. Ernesta is julian. Ernesta is nidifugous. Ernesta is tuneful. Ernesta is spongy. Ernesta is sciolistic. Ernesta is not pedagogic. Stanwood is pedagogic. Katina is julian. Katina is nidifugous. Katina is tuneful. Katina is not spongy. Katina is sciolistic. Katina is kosher. If Stanwood is not kosher then Stanwood is not sciolistic. If Ernesta is sciolistic and Ernesta is nidifugous then Ernesta is not pedagogic. Quiet, tuneful people are julian. All kosher people are julian. Smart people are julian. All nidifugous, sciolistic people are not pedagogic. If someone is pedagogic and not sciolistic then they are nidifugous. If someone is julian then they are nidifugous. Beverie is not tuneful.", "logic": "\nSciolistic(beverie)\nKosher(beverie)\nJulian(ernesta)\nNidifugous(ernesta)\nTuneful(ernesta)\nSpongy(ernesta)\nSciolistic(ernesta)\nnot Pedagogic(ernesta)\nPedagogic(stanwood)\nJulian(katina)\nNidifugous(katina)\nTuneful(katina)\nnot Spongy(katina)\nSciolistic(katina)\nKosher(katina)\nnot Kosher(stanwood) -> not Sciolistic(stanwood)\nSciolistic(ernesta) and Nidifugous(ernesta) -> not Pedagogic(ernesta)\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) and Tuneful(x) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Julian(x))\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> not Pedagogic(x))\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) and not Sciolistic(x) -> Nidifugous(x))\nforall x (Julian(x) -> Nidifugous(x))\n\nnot Tuneful(beverie)\n\nnot Tuneful(beverie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Thayne is urethral. Thayne is insincere. Herbert is chummy. Herbert is eyelike. Herbert is narrowed. Herbert is grisly. Herbert is urethral. Herbert is not polymeric. Judith is polymeric. Oprah is chummy. Oprah is eyelike. Oprah is narrowed. Oprah is not grisly. Oprah is urethral. Oprah is insincere. If Judith is not insincere then Judith is not urethral. If Herbert is urethral and Herbert is eyelike then Herbert is not polymeric. Quiet, narrowed people are chummy. All insincere people are chummy. Smart people are chummy. All eyelike, urethral people are not polymeric. If someone is polymeric and not urethral then they are eyelike. If someone is chummy then they are eyelike. Judith is insincere.", "logic": "\nUrethral(thayne)\nInsincere(thayne)\nChummy(herbert)\nEyelike(herbert)\nNarrowed(herbert)\nGrisly(herbert)\nUrethral(herbert)\nnot Polymeric(herbert)\nPolymeric(judith)\nChummy(oprah)\nEyelike(oprah)\nNarrowed(oprah)\nnot Grisly(oprah)\nUrethral(oprah)\nInsincere(oprah)\nnot Insincere(judith) -> not Urethral(judith)\nUrethral(herbert) and Eyelike(herbert) -> not Polymeric(herbert)\nforall x (Urethral(x) and Narrowed(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Insincere(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Eyelike(x) and Urethral(x) -> not Polymeric(x))\nforall x (Polymeric(x) and not Urethral(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Eyelike(x))\n\nInsincere(judith)\n\nInsincere(judith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Angelo is maudlin. Angelo is tasselled. Fancy is parted. Fancy is barbellate. Fancy is deductible. Fancy is biovular. Fancy is maudlin. Fancy is not globular. Edithe is globular. Laurette is parted. Laurette is barbellate. Laurette is deductible. Laurette is not biovular. Laurette is maudlin. Laurette is tasselled. If Edithe is not tasselled then Edithe is not maudlin. If Fancy is maudlin and Fancy is barbellate then Fancy is not globular. Quiet, deductible people are parted. All tasselled people are parted. Smart people are parted. All barbellate, maudlin people are not globular. If someone is globular and not maudlin then they are barbellate. If someone is parted then they are barbellate. Angelo is not biovular.", "logic": "\nMaudlin(angelo)\nTasselled(angelo)\nParted(fancy)\nBarbellate(fancy)\nDeductible(fancy)\nBiovular(fancy)\nMaudlin(fancy)\nnot Globular(fancy)\nGlobular(edithe)\nParted(laurette)\nBarbellate(laurette)\nDeductible(laurette)\nnot Biovular(laurette)\nMaudlin(laurette)\nTasselled(laurette)\nnot Tasselled(edithe) -> not Maudlin(edithe)\nMaudlin(fancy) and Barbellate(fancy) -> not Globular(fancy)\nforall x (Maudlin(x) and Deductible(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Tasselled(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Globular(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) and Maudlin(x) -> not Globular(x))\nforall x (Globular(x) and not Maudlin(x) -> Barbellate(x))\nforall x (Parted(x) -> Barbellate(x))\n\nnot Biovular(angelo)\n\nnot Biovular(angelo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Marie is plummy. Marie is inchoative. Wendel is cubelike. Wendel is effulgent. Wendel is mitigative. Wendel is parisian. Wendel is plummy. Wendel is not lvii. Emmalyn is lvii. Renel is cubelike. Renel is effulgent. Renel is mitigative. Renel is not parisian. Renel is plummy. Renel is inchoative. If Emmalyn is not inchoative then Emmalyn is not plummy. If Wendel is plummy and Wendel is effulgent then Wendel is not lvii. Quiet, mitigative people are cubelike. All inchoative people are cubelike. Smart people are cubelike. All effulgent, plummy people are not lvii. If someone is lvii and not plummy then they are effulgent. If someone is cubelike then they are effulgent. Emmalyn is mitigative.", "logic": "\nPlummy(marie)\nInchoative(marie)\nCubelike(wendel)\nEffulgent(wendel)\nMitigative(wendel)\nParisian(wendel)\nPlummy(wendel)\nnot Lvii(wendel)\nLvii(emmalyn)\nCubelike(renel)\nEffulgent(renel)\nMitigative(renel)\nnot Parisian(renel)\nPlummy(renel)\nInchoative(renel)\nnot Inchoative(emmalyn) -> not Plummy(emmalyn)\nPlummy(wendel) and Effulgent(wendel) -> not Lvii(wendel)\nforall x (Plummy(x) and Mitigative(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Lvii(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Effulgent(x) and Plummy(x) -> not Lvii(x))\nforall x (Lvii(x) and not Plummy(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) -> Effulgent(x))\n\nMitigative(emmalyn)\n\nMitigative(emmalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "The sheffield brutalise the iolande. The sheffield is intestinal. The sheffield is jellylike. The sheffield modify the iolande. The iolande is fossil. The iolande is jellylike. The iolande modify the sheffield. The iolande sign the weider. The weider brutalise the sheffield. The weider is nonporous. The weider modify the iolande. The weider sign the sheffield. If someone is fossil and they like the weider then the weider is not icky. If someone brutalise the sheffield then the sheffield sign the iolande. If the weider brutalise the iolande and the iolande does not chase the weider then the weider modify the sheffield. If someone is icky then they do not like the iolande. If someone sign the iolande then the iolande is icky. If someone modify the weider and the weider modify the sheffield then they are nonporous. If the iolande does not like the sheffield then the sheffield is nonporous. If someone is nonporous and not icky then they are not jellylike. The sheffield is jellylike.", "logic": "\nBrutalise(sheffield, iolande)\nIntestinal(sheffield)\nJellylike(sheffield)\nModify(sheffield, iolande)\nFossil(iolande)\nJellylike(iolande)\nModify(iolande, sheffield)\nSign(iolande, weider)\nBrutalise(weider, sheffield)\nNonporous(weider)\nModify(weider, iolande)\nSign(weider, sheffield)\nforall x (Fossil(x) and Modify(x, weider) -> not Icky(weider))\nforall x (Brutalise(x, sheffield) -> Sign(sheffield, iolande))\nBrutalise(weider, iolande) and not Brutalise(iolande, weider) -> Modify(weider, sheffield)\nforall x (Icky(x) -> not Modify(x, iolande))\nforall x (Sign(x, iolande) -> Icky(iolande))\nforall x (Modify(x, weider) and Modify(weider, sheffield) -> Nonporous(x))\nnot Modify(iolande, sheffield) -> Nonporous(sheffield)\nforall x (Nonporous(x) and not Icky(x) -> not Jellylike(x))\n\nJellylike(sheffield)\n\ntherefore Jellylike(sheffield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The madona scavenge the casie. The madona is motionless. The madona is wealthy. The madona pursue the casie. The casie is cuneiform. The casie is wealthy. The casie pursue the madona. The casie synthesize the lynna. The lynna scavenge the madona. The lynna is bifurcate. The lynna pursue the casie. The lynna synthesize the madona. If someone is cuneiform and they like the lynna then the lynna is not forehand. If someone scavenge the madona then the madona synthesize the casie. If the lynna scavenge the casie and the casie does not chase the lynna then the lynna pursue the madona. If someone is forehand then they do not like the casie. If someone synthesize the casie then the casie is forehand. If someone pursue the lynna and the lynna pursue the madona then they are bifurcate. If the casie does not like the madona then the madona is bifurcate. If someone is bifurcate and not forehand then they are not wealthy. The madona is not motionless.", "logic": "\nScavenge(madona, casie)\nMotionless(madona)\nWealthy(madona)\nPursue(madona, casie)\nCuneiform(casie)\nWealthy(casie)\nPursue(casie, madona)\nSynthesize(casie, lynna)\nScavenge(lynna, madona)\nBifurcate(lynna)\nPursue(lynna, casie)\nSynthesize(lynna, madona)\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Pursue(x, lynna) -> not Forehand(lynna))\nforall x (Scavenge(x, madona) -> Synthesize(madona, casie))\nScavenge(lynna, casie) and not Scavenge(casie, lynna) -> Pursue(lynna, madona)\nforall x (Forehand(x) -> not Pursue(x, casie))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, casie) -> Forehand(casie))\nforall x (Pursue(x, lynna) and Pursue(lynna, madona) -> Bifurcate(x))\nnot Pursue(casie, madona) -> Bifurcate(madona)\nforall x (Bifurcate(x) and not Forehand(x) -> not Wealthy(x))\n\nnot Motionless(madona)\n\ntherefore Motionless(madona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The carissa transfer the willette. The carissa is uninominal. The carissa is balsamic. The carissa polychrome the willette. The willette is impassive. The willette is balsamic. The willette polychrome the carissa. The willette revenge the gianina. The gianina transfer the carissa. The gianina is evacuant. The gianina polychrome the willette. The gianina revenge the carissa. If someone is impassive and they like the gianina then the gianina is not catamenial. If someone transfer the carissa then the carissa revenge the willette. If the gianina transfer the willette and the willette does not chase the gianina then the gianina polychrome the carissa. If someone is catamenial then they do not like the willette. If someone revenge the willette then the willette is catamenial. If someone polychrome the gianina and the gianina polychrome the carissa then they are evacuant. If the willette does not like the carissa then the carissa is evacuant. If someone is evacuant and not catamenial then they are not balsamic. The carissa revenge the willette.", "logic": "\nTransfer(carissa, willette)\nUninominal(carissa)\nBalsamic(carissa)\nPolychrome(carissa, willette)\nImpassive(willette)\nBalsamic(willette)\nPolychrome(willette, carissa)\nRevenge(willette, gianina)\nTransfer(gianina, carissa)\nEvacuant(gianina)\nPolychrome(gianina, willette)\nRevenge(gianina, carissa)\nforall x (Impassive(x) and Polychrome(x, gianina) -> not Catamenial(gianina))\nforall x (Transfer(x, carissa) -> Revenge(carissa, willette))\nTransfer(gianina, willette) and not Transfer(willette, gianina) -> Polychrome(gianina, carissa)\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> not Polychrome(x, willette))\nforall x (Revenge(x, willette) -> Catamenial(willette))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, gianina) and Polychrome(gianina, carissa) -> Evacuant(x))\nnot Polychrome(willette, carissa) -> Evacuant(carissa)\nforall x (Evacuant(x) and not Catamenial(x) -> not Balsamic(x))\n\nRevenge(carissa, willette)\n\nTransfer(gianina, carissa) and forall x (Transfer(x, carissa) -> Revenge(carissa, willette)) -> therefore Revenge(carissa, willette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The kirsteni deplane the renato. The kirsteni is healing. The kirsteni is faltering. The kirsteni hinge the renato. The renato is apheretic. The renato is faltering. The renato hinge the kirsteni. The renato transgress the matthiew. The matthiew deplane the kirsteni. The matthiew is pressed. The matthiew hinge the renato. The matthiew transgress the kirsteni. If someone is apheretic and they like the matthiew then the matthiew is not hoary. If someone deplane the kirsteni then the kirsteni transgress the renato. If the matthiew deplane the renato and the renato does not chase the matthiew then the matthiew hinge the kirsteni. If someone is hoary then they do not like the renato. If someone transgress the renato then the renato is hoary. If someone hinge the matthiew and the matthiew hinge the kirsteni then they are pressed. If the renato does not like the kirsteni then the kirsteni is pressed. If someone is pressed and not hoary then they are not faltering. The kirsteni does not need the renato.", "logic": "\nDeplane(kirsteni, renato)\nHealing(kirsteni)\nFaltering(kirsteni)\nHinge(kirsteni, renato)\nApheretic(renato)\nFaltering(renato)\nHinge(renato, kirsteni)\nTransgress(renato, matthiew)\nDeplane(matthiew, kirsteni)\nPressed(matthiew)\nHinge(matthiew, renato)\nTransgress(matthiew, kirsteni)\nforall x (Apheretic(x) and Hinge(x, matthiew) -> not Hoary(matthiew))\nforall x (Deplane(x, kirsteni) -> Transgress(kirsteni, renato))\nDeplane(matthiew, renato) and not Deplane(renato, matthiew) -> Hinge(matthiew, kirsteni)\nforall x (Hoary(x) -> not Hinge(x, renato))\nforall x (Transgress(x, renato) -> Hoary(renato))\nforall x (Hinge(x, matthiew) and Hinge(matthiew, kirsteni) -> Pressed(x))\nnot Hinge(renato, kirsteni) -> Pressed(kirsteni)\nforall x (Pressed(x) and not Hoary(x) -> not Faltering(x))\n\nnot Transgress(kirsteni, renato)\n\nDeplane(matthiew, kirsteni) and forall x (Deplane(x, kirsteni) -> Transgress(kirsteni, renato)) -> therefore Transgress(kirsteni, renato)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The aube epilate the lyssa. The aube is nervy. The aube is atomistic. The aube ensnarl the lyssa. The lyssa is diametric. The lyssa is atomistic. The lyssa ensnarl the aube. The lyssa aerate the arther. The arther epilate the aube. The arther is laudatory. The arther ensnarl the lyssa. The arther aerate the aube. If someone is diametric and they like the arther then the arther is not albescent. If someone epilate the aube then the aube aerate the lyssa. If the arther epilate the lyssa and the lyssa does not chase the arther then the arther ensnarl the aube. If someone is albescent then they do not like the lyssa. If someone aerate the lyssa then the lyssa is albescent. If someone ensnarl the arther and the arther ensnarl the aube then they are laudatory. If the lyssa does not like the aube then the aube is laudatory. If someone is laudatory and not albescent then they are not atomistic. The lyssa is albescent.", "logic": "\nEpilate(aube, lyssa)\nNervy(aube)\nAtomistic(aube)\nEnsnarl(aube, lyssa)\nDiametric(lyssa)\nAtomistic(lyssa)\nEnsnarl(lyssa, aube)\nAerate(lyssa, arther)\nEpilate(arther, aube)\nLaudatory(arther)\nEnsnarl(arther, lyssa)\nAerate(arther, aube)\nforall x (Diametric(x) and Ensnarl(x, arther) -> not Albescent(arther))\nforall x (Epilate(x, aube) -> Aerate(aube, lyssa))\nEpilate(arther, lyssa) and not Epilate(lyssa, arther) -> Ensnarl(arther, aube)\nforall x (Albescent(x) -> not Ensnarl(x, lyssa))\nforall x (Aerate(x, lyssa) -> Albescent(lyssa))\nforall x (Ensnarl(x, arther) and Ensnarl(arther, aube) -> Laudatory(x))\nnot Ensnarl(lyssa, aube) -> Laudatory(aube)\nforall x (Laudatory(x) and not Albescent(x) -> not Atomistic(x))\n\nAlbescent(lyssa)\n\nEpilate(arther, aube) and forall x (Epilate(x, aube) -> Aerate(aube, lyssa)) -> therefore Aerate(aube, lyssa) Aerate(aube, lyssa) and forall x (Aerate(x, lyssa) -> Albescent(lyssa)) -> therefore Albescent(lyssa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The angelo tongue the rodge. The angelo is spiteful. The angelo is petallike. The angelo detox the rodge. The rodge is detersive. The rodge is petallike. The rodge detox the angelo. The rodge tell the garnet. The garnet tongue the angelo. The garnet is boreal. The garnet detox the rodge. The garnet tell the angelo. If someone is detersive and they like the garnet then the garnet is not actinic. If someone tongue the angelo then the angelo tell the rodge. If the garnet tongue the rodge and the rodge does not chase the garnet then the garnet detox the angelo. If someone is actinic then they do not like the rodge. If someone tell the rodge then the rodge is actinic. If someone detox the garnet and the garnet detox the angelo then they are boreal. If the rodge does not like the angelo then the angelo is boreal. If someone is boreal and not actinic then they are not petallike. The rodge is not actinic.", "logic": "\nTongue(angelo, rodge)\nSpiteful(angelo)\nPetallike(angelo)\nDetox(angelo, rodge)\nDetersive(rodge)\nPetallike(rodge)\nDetox(rodge, angelo)\nTell(rodge, garnet)\nTongue(garnet, angelo)\nBoreal(garnet)\nDetox(garnet, rodge)\nTell(garnet, angelo)\nforall x (Detersive(x) and Detox(x, garnet) -> not Actinic(garnet))\nforall x (Tongue(x, angelo) -> Tell(angelo, rodge))\nTongue(garnet, rodge) and not Tongue(rodge, garnet) -> Detox(garnet, angelo)\nforall x (Actinic(x) -> not Detox(x, rodge))\nforall x (Tell(x, rodge) -> Actinic(rodge))\nforall x (Detox(x, garnet) and Detox(garnet, angelo) -> Boreal(x))\nnot Detox(rodge, angelo) -> Boreal(angelo)\nforall x (Boreal(x) and not Actinic(x) -> not Petallike(x))\n\nnot Actinic(rodge)\n\nTongue(garnet, angelo) and forall x (Tongue(x, angelo) -> Tell(angelo, rodge)) -> therefore Tell(angelo, rodge) Tell(angelo, rodge) and forall x (Tell(x, rodge) -> Actinic(rodge)) -> therefore Actinic(rodge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The sherye share the cole. The sherye is unshackled. The sherye is vocative. The sherye supplement the cole. The cole is appointive. The cole is vocative. The cole supplement the sherye. The cole pitch the hadleigh. The hadleigh share the sherye. The hadleigh is mothproof. The hadleigh supplement the cole. The hadleigh pitch the sherye. If someone is appointive and they like the hadleigh then the hadleigh is not chinese. If someone share the sherye then the sherye pitch the cole. If the hadleigh share the cole and the cole does not chase the hadleigh then the hadleigh supplement the sherye. If someone is chinese then they do not like the cole. If someone pitch the cole then the cole is chinese. If someone supplement the hadleigh and the hadleigh supplement the sherye then they are mothproof. If the cole does not like the sherye then the sherye is mothproof. If someone is mothproof and not chinese then they are not vocative. The cole does not like the cole.", "logic": "\nShare(sherye, cole)\nUnshackled(sherye)\nVocative(sherye)\nSupplement(sherye, cole)\nAppointive(cole)\nVocative(cole)\nSupplement(cole, sherye)\nPitch(cole, hadleigh)\nShare(hadleigh, sherye)\nMothproof(hadleigh)\nSupplement(hadleigh, cole)\nPitch(hadleigh, sherye)\nforall x (Appointive(x) and Supplement(x, hadleigh) -> not Chinese(hadleigh))\nforall x (Share(x, sherye) -> Pitch(sherye, cole))\nShare(hadleigh, cole) and not Share(cole, hadleigh) -> Supplement(hadleigh, sherye)\nforall x (Chinese(x) -> not Supplement(x, cole))\nforall x (Pitch(x, cole) -> Chinese(cole))\nforall x (Supplement(x, hadleigh) and Supplement(hadleigh, sherye) -> Mothproof(x))\nnot Supplement(cole, sherye) -> Mothproof(sherye)\nforall x (Mothproof(x) and not Chinese(x) -> not Vocative(x))\n\nnot Supplement(cole, cole)\n\nShare(hadleigh, sherye) and forall x (Share(x, sherye) -> Pitch(sherye, cole)) -> therefore Pitch(sherye, cole) Pitch(sherye, cole) and forall x (Pitch(x, cole) -> Chinese(cole)) -> therefore Chinese(cole) Chinese(cole) and forall x (Chinese(x) -> not Supplement(x, cole)) -> therefore not Supplement(cole, cole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The marilee sporulate the wallie. The marilee is isocyclic. The marilee is seminal. The marilee oink the wallie. The wallie is shivery. The wallie is seminal. The wallie oink the marilee. The wallie abet the abagail. The abagail sporulate the marilee. The abagail is downscale. The abagail oink the wallie. The abagail abet the marilee. If someone is shivery and they like the abagail then the abagail is not sunk. If someone sporulate the marilee then the marilee abet the wallie. If the abagail sporulate the wallie and the wallie does not chase the abagail then the abagail oink the marilee. If someone is sunk then they do not like the wallie. If someone abet the wallie then the wallie is sunk. If someone oink the abagail and the abagail oink the marilee then they are downscale. If the wallie does not like the marilee then the marilee is downscale. If someone is downscale and not sunk then they are not seminal. The wallie oink the wallie.", "logic": "\nSporulate(marilee, wallie)\nIsocyclic(marilee)\nSeminal(marilee)\nOink(marilee, wallie)\nShivery(wallie)\nSeminal(wallie)\nOink(wallie, marilee)\nAbet(wallie, abagail)\nSporulate(abagail, marilee)\nDownscale(abagail)\nOink(abagail, wallie)\nAbet(abagail, marilee)\nforall x (Shivery(x) and Oink(x, abagail) -> not Sunk(abagail))\nforall x (Sporulate(x, marilee) -> Abet(marilee, wallie))\nSporulate(abagail, wallie) and not Sporulate(wallie, abagail) -> Oink(abagail, marilee)\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> not Oink(x, wallie))\nforall x (Abet(x, wallie) -> Sunk(wallie))\nforall x (Oink(x, abagail) and Oink(abagail, marilee) -> Downscale(x))\nnot Oink(wallie, marilee) -> Downscale(marilee)\nforall x (Downscale(x) and not Sunk(x) -> not Seminal(x))\n\nOink(wallie, wallie)\n\nSporulate(abagail, marilee) and forall x (Sporulate(x, marilee) -> Abet(marilee, wallie)) -> therefore Abet(marilee, wallie) Abet(marilee, wallie) and forall x (Abet(x, wallie) -> Sunk(wallie)) -> therefore Sunk(wallie) Sunk(wallie) and forall x (Sunk(x) -> not Oink(x, wallie)) -> therefore not Oink(wallie, wallie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The nevsa slacken the gabriele. The nevsa is advised. The nevsa is prismatic. The nevsa detain the gabriele. The gabriele is arminian. The gabriele is prismatic. The gabriele detain the nevsa. The gabriele reexamine the bernadene. The bernadene slacken the nevsa. The bernadene is grumose. The bernadene detain the gabriele. The bernadene reexamine the nevsa. If someone is arminian and they like the bernadene then the bernadene is not scriptural. If someone slacken the nevsa then the nevsa reexamine the gabriele. If the bernadene slacken the gabriele and the gabriele does not chase the bernadene then the bernadene detain the nevsa. If someone is scriptural then they do not like the gabriele. If someone reexamine the gabriele then the gabriele is scriptural. If someone detain the bernadene and the bernadene detain the nevsa then they are grumose. If the gabriele does not like the nevsa then the nevsa is grumose. If someone is grumose and not scriptural then they are not prismatic. The nevsa is not grumose.", "logic": "\nSlacken(nevsa, gabriele)\nAdvised(nevsa)\nPrismatic(nevsa)\nDetain(nevsa, gabriele)\nArminian(gabriele)\nPrismatic(gabriele)\nDetain(gabriele, nevsa)\nReexamine(gabriele, bernadene)\nSlacken(bernadene, nevsa)\nGrumose(bernadene)\nDetain(bernadene, gabriele)\nReexamine(bernadene, nevsa)\nforall x (Arminian(x) and Detain(x, bernadene) -> not Scriptural(bernadene))\nforall x (Slacken(x, nevsa) -> Reexamine(nevsa, gabriele))\nSlacken(bernadene, gabriele) and not Slacken(gabriele, bernadene) -> Detain(bernadene, nevsa)\nforall x (Scriptural(x) -> not Detain(x, gabriele))\nforall x (Reexamine(x, gabriele) -> Scriptural(gabriele))\nforall x (Detain(x, bernadene) and Detain(bernadene, nevsa) -> Grumose(x))\nnot Detain(gabriele, nevsa) -> Grumose(nevsa)\nforall x (Grumose(x) and not Scriptural(x) -> not Prismatic(x))\n\nnot Grumose(nevsa)\n\nforall x (Detain(x, bernadene) and Detain(bernadene, nevsa) -> Grumose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The tedrick assonate the waverley. The tedrick is shaved. The tedrick is frilly. The tedrick factor the waverley. The waverley is appositive. The waverley is frilly. The waverley factor the tedrick. The waverley reappear the jonie. The jonie assonate the tedrick. The jonie is maoist. The jonie factor the waverley. The jonie reappear the tedrick. If someone is appositive and they like the jonie then the jonie is not shoeless. If someone assonate the tedrick then the tedrick reappear the waverley. If the jonie assonate the waverley and the waverley does not chase the jonie then the jonie factor the tedrick. If someone is shoeless then they do not like the waverley. If someone reappear the waverley then the waverley is shoeless. If someone factor the jonie and the jonie factor the tedrick then they are maoist. If the waverley does not like the tedrick then the tedrick is maoist. If someone is maoist and not shoeless then they are not frilly. The waverley is maoist.", "logic": "\nAssonate(tedrick, waverley)\nShaved(tedrick)\nFrilly(tedrick)\nFactor(tedrick, waverley)\nAppositive(waverley)\nFrilly(waverley)\nFactor(waverley, tedrick)\nReappear(waverley, jonie)\nAssonate(jonie, tedrick)\nMaoist(jonie)\nFactor(jonie, waverley)\nReappear(jonie, tedrick)\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Factor(x, jonie) -> not Shoeless(jonie))\nforall x (Assonate(x, tedrick) -> Reappear(tedrick, waverley))\nAssonate(jonie, waverley) and not Assonate(waverley, jonie) -> Factor(jonie, tedrick)\nforall x (Shoeless(x) -> not Factor(x, waverley))\nforall x (Reappear(x, waverley) -> Shoeless(waverley))\nforall x (Factor(x, jonie) and Factor(jonie, tedrick) -> Maoist(x))\nnot Factor(waverley, tedrick) -> Maoist(tedrick)\nforall x (Maoist(x) and not Shoeless(x) -> not Frilly(x))\n\nMaoist(waverley)\n\nforall x (Factor(x, jonie) and Factor(jonie, tedrick) -> Maoist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The nitin symphonise the rozalie. The nitin is agnostical. The nitin is calycinal. The nitin monetize the rozalie. The rozalie is gilbertian. The rozalie is calycinal. The rozalie monetize the nitin. The rozalie rest the keriann. The keriann symphonise the nitin. The keriann is alleged. The keriann monetize the rozalie. The keriann rest the nitin. If someone is gilbertian and they like the keriann then the keriann is not acetylenic. If someone symphonise the nitin then the nitin rest the rozalie. If the keriann symphonise the rozalie and the rozalie does not chase the keriann then the keriann monetize the nitin. If someone is acetylenic then they do not like the rozalie. If someone rest the rozalie then the rozalie is acetylenic. If someone monetize the keriann and the keriann monetize the nitin then they are alleged. If the rozalie does not like the nitin then the nitin is alleged. If someone is alleged and not acetylenic then they are not calycinal. The keriann does not like the nitin.", "logic": "\nSymphonise(nitin, rozalie)\nAgnostical(nitin)\nCalycinal(nitin)\nMonetize(nitin, rozalie)\nGilbertian(rozalie)\nCalycinal(rozalie)\nMonetize(rozalie, nitin)\nRest(rozalie, keriann)\nSymphonise(keriann, nitin)\nAlleged(keriann)\nMonetize(keriann, rozalie)\nRest(keriann, nitin)\nforall x (Gilbertian(x) and Monetize(x, keriann) -> not Acetylenic(keriann))\nforall x (Symphonise(x, nitin) -> Rest(nitin, rozalie))\nSymphonise(keriann, rozalie) and not Symphonise(rozalie, keriann) -> Monetize(keriann, nitin)\nforall x (Acetylenic(x) -> not Monetize(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Rest(x, rozalie) -> Acetylenic(rozalie))\nforall x (Monetize(x, keriann) and Monetize(keriann, nitin) -> Alleged(x))\nnot Monetize(rozalie, nitin) -> Alleged(nitin)\nforall x (Alleged(x) and not Acetylenic(x) -> not Calycinal(x))\n\nnot Monetize(keriann, nitin)\n\nSymphonise(keriann, rozalie) and not Symphonise(rozalie, keriann) -> Monetize(keriann, nitin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The debbra capitulate the carlin. The debbra is moroccan. The debbra is adventive. The debbra address the carlin. The carlin is anatropous. The carlin is adventive. The carlin address the debbra. The carlin fructify the dominick. The dominick capitulate the debbra. The dominick is noduled. The dominick address the carlin. The dominick fructify the debbra. If someone is anatropous and they like the dominick then the dominick is not ceilinged. If someone capitulate the debbra then the debbra fructify the carlin. If the dominick capitulate the carlin and the carlin does not chase the dominick then the dominick address the debbra. If someone is ceilinged then they do not like the carlin. If someone fructify the carlin then the carlin is ceilinged. If someone address the dominick and the dominick address the debbra then they are noduled. If the carlin does not like the debbra then the debbra is noduled. If someone is noduled and not ceilinged then they are not adventive. The dominick is moroccan.", "logic": "\nCapitulate(debbra, carlin)\nMoroccan(debbra)\nAdventive(debbra)\nAddress(debbra, carlin)\nAnatropous(carlin)\nAdventive(carlin)\nAddress(carlin, debbra)\nFructify(carlin, dominick)\nCapitulate(dominick, debbra)\nNoduled(dominick)\nAddress(dominick, carlin)\nFructify(dominick, debbra)\nforall x (Anatropous(x) and Address(x, dominick) -> not Ceilinged(dominick))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, debbra) -> Fructify(debbra, carlin))\nCapitulate(dominick, carlin) and not Capitulate(carlin, dominick) -> Address(dominick, debbra)\nforall x (Ceilinged(x) -> not Address(x, carlin))\nforall x (Fructify(x, carlin) -> Ceilinged(carlin))\nforall x (Address(x, dominick) and Address(dominick, debbra) -> Noduled(x))\nnot Address(carlin, debbra) -> Noduled(debbra)\nforall x (Noduled(x) and not Ceilinged(x) -> not Adventive(x))\n\nMoroccan(dominick)\n\nMoroccan(dominick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The lane immerse the rosalia. The lane is sabine. The lane is mythical. The lane smack the rosalia. The rosalia is unable. The rosalia is mythical. The rosalia smack the lane. The rosalia goldbrick the harald. The harald immerse the lane. The harald is lipotropic. The harald smack the rosalia. The harald goldbrick the lane. If someone is unable and they like the harald then the harald is not cormous. If someone immerse the lane then the lane goldbrick the rosalia. If the harald immerse the rosalia and the rosalia does not chase the harald then the harald smack the lane. If someone is cormous then they do not like the rosalia. If someone goldbrick the rosalia then the rosalia is cormous. If someone smack the harald and the harald smack the lane then they are lipotropic. If the rosalia does not like the lane then the lane is lipotropic. If someone is lipotropic and not cormous then they are not mythical. The lane does not like the lane.", "logic": "\nImmerse(lane, rosalia)\nSabine(lane)\nMythical(lane)\nSmack(lane, rosalia)\nUnable(rosalia)\nMythical(rosalia)\nSmack(rosalia, lane)\nGoldbrick(rosalia, harald)\nImmerse(harald, lane)\nLipotropic(harald)\nSmack(harald, rosalia)\nGoldbrick(harald, lane)\nforall x (Unable(x) and Smack(x, harald) -> not Cormous(harald))\nforall x (Immerse(x, lane) -> Goldbrick(lane, rosalia))\nImmerse(harald, rosalia) and not Immerse(rosalia, harald) -> Smack(harald, lane)\nforall x (Cormous(x) -> not Smack(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Goldbrick(x, rosalia) -> Cormous(rosalia))\nforall x (Smack(x, harald) and Smack(harald, lane) -> Lipotropic(x))\nnot Smack(rosalia, lane) -> Lipotropic(lane)\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) and not Cormous(x) -> not Mythical(x))\n\nnot Smack(lane, lane)\n\nnot Smack(lane, lane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The thaddeus dishearten the robinett. The thaddeus is unannealed. The thaddeus is snarled. The thaddeus grit the robinett. The robinett is vaginal. The robinett is snarled. The robinett grit the thaddeus. The robinett bacterize the carline. The carline dishearten the thaddeus. The carline is succinic. The carline grit the robinett. The carline bacterize the thaddeus. If someone is vaginal and they like the carline then the carline is not wiry. If someone dishearten the thaddeus then the thaddeus bacterize the robinett. If the carline dishearten the robinett and the robinett does not chase the carline then the carline grit the thaddeus. If someone is wiry then they do not like the robinett. If someone bacterize the robinett then the robinett is wiry. If someone grit the carline and the carline grit the thaddeus then they are succinic. If the robinett does not like the thaddeus then the thaddeus is succinic. If someone is succinic and not wiry then they are not snarled. The thaddeus bacterize the thaddeus.", "logic": "\nDishearten(thaddeus, robinett)\nUnannealed(thaddeus)\nSnarled(thaddeus)\nGrit(thaddeus, robinett)\nVaginal(robinett)\nSnarled(robinett)\nGrit(robinett, thaddeus)\nBacterize(robinett, carline)\nDishearten(carline, thaddeus)\nSuccinic(carline)\nGrit(carline, robinett)\nBacterize(carline, thaddeus)\nforall x (Vaginal(x) and Grit(x, carline) -> not Wiry(carline))\nforall x (Dishearten(x, thaddeus) -> Bacterize(thaddeus, robinett))\nDishearten(carline, robinett) and not Dishearten(robinett, carline) -> Grit(carline, thaddeus)\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> not Grit(x, robinett))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, robinett) -> Wiry(robinett))\nforall x (Grit(x, carline) and Grit(carline, thaddeus) -> Succinic(x))\nnot Grit(robinett, thaddeus) -> Succinic(thaddeus)\nforall x (Succinic(x) and not Wiry(x) -> not Snarled(x))\n\nBacterize(thaddeus, thaddeus)\n\nBacterize(thaddeus, thaddeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The bradford waterproof the twyla. The bradford is edentulous. The bradford is acerbic. The bradford constitute the twyla. The twyla is vestiary. The twyla is acerbic. The twyla constitute the bradford. The twyla overburden the darlene. The darlene waterproof the bradford. The darlene is tied. The darlene constitute the twyla. The darlene overburden the bradford. If someone is vestiary and they like the darlene then the darlene is not overstrung. If someone waterproof the bradford then the bradford overburden the twyla. If the darlene waterproof the twyla and the twyla does not chase the darlene then the darlene constitute the bradford. If someone is overstrung then they do not like the twyla. If someone overburden the twyla then the twyla is overstrung. If someone constitute the darlene and the darlene constitute the bradford then they are tied. If the twyla does not like the bradford then the bradford is tied. If someone is tied and not overstrung then they are not acerbic. The bradford does not like the darlene.", "logic": "\nWaterproof(bradford, twyla)\nEdentulous(bradford)\nAcerbic(bradford)\nConstitute(bradford, twyla)\nVestiary(twyla)\nAcerbic(twyla)\nConstitute(twyla, bradford)\nOverburden(twyla, darlene)\nWaterproof(darlene, bradford)\nTied(darlene)\nConstitute(darlene, twyla)\nOverburden(darlene, bradford)\nforall x (Vestiary(x) and Constitute(x, darlene) -> not Overstrung(darlene))\nforall x (Waterproof(x, bradford) -> Overburden(bradford, twyla))\nWaterproof(darlene, twyla) and not Waterproof(twyla, darlene) -> Constitute(darlene, bradford)\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> not Constitute(x, twyla))\nforall x (Overburden(x, twyla) -> Overstrung(twyla))\nforall x (Constitute(x, darlene) and Constitute(darlene, bradford) -> Tied(x))\nnot Constitute(twyla, bradford) -> Tied(bradford)\nforall x (Tied(x) and not Overstrung(x) -> not Acerbic(x))\n\nnot Constitute(bradford, darlene)\n\nnot Constitute(bradford, darlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The isaac leave the reed. The isaac is snazzy. The isaac is terefah. The isaac liquefy the reed. The reed is edged. The reed is terefah. The reed liquefy the isaac. The reed blat the shena. The shena leave the isaac. The shena is sanitary. The shena liquefy the reed. The shena blat the isaac. If someone is edged and they like the shena then the shena is not emollient. If someone leave the isaac then the isaac blat the reed. If the shena leave the reed and the reed does not chase the shena then the shena liquefy the isaac. If someone is emollient then they do not like the reed. If someone blat the reed then the reed is emollient. If someone liquefy the shena and the shena liquefy the isaac then they are sanitary. If the reed does not like the isaac then the isaac is sanitary. If someone is sanitary and not emollient then they are not terefah. The shena is terefah.", "logic": "\nLeave(isaac, reed)\nSnazzy(isaac)\nTerefah(isaac)\nLiquefy(isaac, reed)\nEdged(reed)\nTerefah(reed)\nLiquefy(reed, isaac)\nBlat(reed, shena)\nLeave(shena, isaac)\nSanitary(shena)\nLiquefy(shena, reed)\nBlat(shena, isaac)\nforall x (Edged(x) and Liquefy(x, shena) -> not Emollient(shena))\nforall x (Leave(x, isaac) -> Blat(isaac, reed))\nLeave(shena, reed) and not Leave(reed, shena) -> Liquefy(shena, isaac)\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> not Liquefy(x, reed))\nforall x (Blat(x, reed) -> Emollient(reed))\nforall x (Liquefy(x, shena) and Liquefy(shena, isaac) -> Sanitary(x))\nnot Liquefy(reed, isaac) -> Sanitary(isaac)\nforall x (Sanitary(x) and not Emollient(x) -> not Terefah(x))\n\nTerefah(shena)\n\nTerefah(shena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "Jeremias is moroccan. Sholom is cosmetic. Ronda is acuate. Russ is cosmetic. If something is moroccan then it is reverend. Nice, cosmetic things are acuate. If something is dashing and cosmetic then it is germfree. All dashing things are germfree. Green things are dashing. If something is acuate and not dashing then it is tearaway. Ronda is acuate.", "logic": "\nMoroccan(jeremias)\nCosmetic(sholom)\nAcuate(ronda)\nCosmetic(russ)\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> Acuate(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Acuate(x) and not Dashing(x) -> Tearaway(x))\n\nAcuate(ronda)\n\ntherefore Acuate(ronda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Miles is excusable. Jeff is unshod. Eliot is misty. Madge is unshod. If something is excusable then it is aired. Nice, unshod things are misty. If something is severed and unshod then it is scabby. All severed things are scabby. Green things are severed. If something is misty and not severed then it is nonlexical. Miles is not excusable.", "logic": "\nExcusable(miles)\nUnshod(jeff)\nMisty(eliot)\nUnshod(madge)\nforall x (Excusable(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Scabby(x) and Unshod(x) -> Misty(x))\nforall x (Severed(x) and Unshod(x) -> Scabby(x))\nforall x (Severed(x) -> Scabby(x))\nforall x (Unshod(x) -> Severed(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) and not Severed(x) -> Nonlexical(x))\n\nnot Excusable(miles)\n\ntherefore Excusable(miles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Ralina is unwell. Conan is dished. Ralf is bedimmed. Umberto is dished. If something is unwell then it is arciform. Nice, dished things are bedimmed. If something is naval and dished then it is short. All naval things are short. Green things are naval. If something is bedimmed and not naval then it is unclouded. Umberto is naval.", "logic": "\nUnwell(ralina)\nDished(conan)\nBedimmed(ralf)\nDished(umberto)\nforall x (Unwell(x) -> Arciform(x))\nforall x (Short(x) and Dished(x) -> Bedimmed(x))\nforall x (Naval(x) and Dished(x) -> Short(x))\nforall x (Naval(x) -> Short(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Naval(x))\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) and not Naval(x) -> Unclouded(x))\n\nNaval(umberto)\n\nDished(umberto) and forall x (Dished(x) -> Naval(x)) -> therefore Naval(umberto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Shirleen is imported. Hart is panicled. Suzette is ectodermal. Beatrisa is panicled. If something is imported then it is satiric. Nice, panicled things are ectodermal. If something is sickening and panicled then it is bimestrial. All sickening things are bimestrial. Green things are sickening. If something is ectodermal and not sickening then it is bicentric. Shirleen is not satiric.", "logic": "\nImported(shirleen)\nPanicled(hart)\nEctodermal(suzette)\nPanicled(beatrisa)\nforall x (Imported(x) -> Satiric(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) and Panicled(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Panicled(x) -> Bimestrial(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Bimestrial(x))\nforall x (Panicled(x) -> Sickening(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and not Sickening(x) -> Bicentric(x))\n\nnot Satiric(shirleen)\n\nImported(shirleen) and forall x (Imported(x) -> Satiric(x)) -> therefore Satiric(shirleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Vonni is floccose. Tammy is budding. Aurelea is forcible. Nanete is budding. If something is floccose then it is polar. Nice, budding things are forcible. If something is forward and budding then it is tapestried. All forward things are tapestried. Green things are forward. If something is forcible and not forward then it is stylistic. Nanete is tapestried.", "logic": "\nFloccose(vonni)\nBudding(tammy)\nForcible(aurelea)\nBudding(nanete)\nforall x (Floccose(x) -> Polar(x))\nforall x (Tapestried(x) and Budding(x) -> Forcible(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) and Budding(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nforall x (Budding(x) -> Forward(x))\nforall x (Forcible(x) and not Forward(x) -> Stylistic(x))\n\nTapestried(nanete)\n\nBudding(nanete) and forall x (Budding(x) -> Forward(x)) -> therefore Forward(nanete) Forward(nanete) and forall x (Forward(x) -> Tapestried(x)) -> therefore Tapestried(nanete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Kelvin is musical. Bernd is panicked. Frances is drained. Taryn is panicked. If something is musical then it is incorrect. Nice, panicked things are drained. If something is buckshee and panicked then it is defoliated. All buckshee things are defoliated. Green things are buckshee. If something is drained and not buckshee then it is winless. Taryn is not defoliated.", "logic": "\nMusical(kelvin)\nPanicked(bernd)\nDrained(frances)\nPanicked(taryn)\nforall x (Musical(x) -> Incorrect(x))\nforall x (Defoliated(x) and Panicked(x) -> Drained(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and Panicked(x) -> Defoliated(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> Defoliated(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) and not Buckshee(x) -> Winless(x))\n\nnot Defoliated(taryn)\n\nPanicked(taryn) and forall x (Panicked(x) -> Buckshee(x)) -> therefore Buckshee(taryn) Buckshee(taryn) and forall x (Buckshee(x) -> Defoliated(x)) -> therefore Defoliated(taryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Westbrook is tannish. Efram is binocular. Kaster is structured. Joane is binocular. If something is tannish then it is probing. Nice, binocular things are structured. If something is cragged and binocular then it is multilevel. All cragged things are multilevel. Green things are cragged. If something is structured and not cragged then it is copular. Efram is structured.", "logic": "\nTannish(westbrook)\nBinocular(efram)\nStructured(kaster)\nBinocular(joane)\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Probing(x))\nforall x (Multilevel(x) and Binocular(x) -> Structured(x))\nforall x (Cragged(x) and Binocular(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Cragged(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) and not Cragged(x) -> Copular(x))\n\nStructured(efram)\n\nBinocular(efram) and forall x (Binocular(x) -> Cragged(x)) -> therefore Cragged(efram) Cragged(efram) and forall x (Cragged(x) -> Multilevel(x)) -> therefore Multilevel(efram) Multilevel(efram) and Binocular(efram) and forall x (Multilevel(x) and Binocular(x) -> Structured(x)) -> therefore Structured(efram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Mavra is tinned. Dara is tyrolean. Charley is mycenaean. Lizabeth is tyrolean. If something is tinned then it is sublunar. Nice, tyrolean things are mycenaean. If something is striking and tyrolean then it is assailable. All striking things are assailable. Green things are striking. If something is mycenaean and not striking then it is generous. Lizabeth is not mycenaean.", "logic": "\nTinned(mavra)\nTyrolean(dara)\nMycenaean(charley)\nTyrolean(lizabeth)\nforall x (Tinned(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Assailable(x) and Tyrolean(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) and Tyrolean(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Tyrolean(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and not Striking(x) -> Generous(x))\n\nnot Mycenaean(lizabeth)\n\nTyrolean(lizabeth) and forall x (Tyrolean(x) -> Striking(x)) -> therefore Striking(lizabeth) Striking(lizabeth) and forall x (Striking(x) -> Assailable(x)) -> therefore Assailable(lizabeth) Assailable(lizabeth) and Tyrolean(lizabeth) and forall x (Assailable(x) and Tyrolean(x) -> Mycenaean(x)) -> therefore Mycenaean(lizabeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Nert is misguided. Barbie is resurgent. Francesca is bathyal. Codie is resurgent. If something is misguided then it is welsh. Nice, resurgent things are bathyal. If something is ascensive and resurgent then it is scarlet. All ascensive things are scarlet. Green things are ascensive. If something is bathyal and not ascensive then it is nullified. Francesca is not scarlet.", "logic": "\nMisguided(nert)\nResurgent(barbie)\nBathyal(francesca)\nResurgent(codie)\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Welsh(x))\nforall x (Scarlet(x) and Resurgent(x) -> Bathyal(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) and Resurgent(x) -> Scarlet(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Scarlet(x))\nforall x (Resurgent(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Bathyal(x) and not Ascensive(x) -> Nullified(x))\n\nnot Scarlet(francesca)\n\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Scarlet(x)) <- forall x (Resurgent(x) -> Ascensive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Marybelle is abysmal. Bailey is transitory. Vernice is elaborated. Rajeev is transitory. If something is abysmal then it is renewed. Nice, transitory things are elaborated. If something is splenetic and transitory then it is unfeminine. All splenetic things are unfeminine. Green things are splenetic. If something is elaborated and not splenetic then it is pretty. Bailey is pretty.", "logic": "\nAbysmal(marybelle)\nTransitory(bailey)\nElaborated(vernice)\nTransitory(rajeev)\nforall x (Abysmal(x) -> Renewed(x))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and Transitory(x) -> Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Splenetic(x) and Transitory(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Splenetic(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Splenetic(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and not Splenetic(x) -> Pretty(x))\n\nPretty(bailey)\n\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and not Splenetic(x) -> Pretty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Tyler is bragging. Fianna is omniscient. Joellyn is lacteal. Aile is omniscient. If something is bragging then it is headed. Nice, omniscient things are lacteal. If something is stygian and omniscient then it is populous. All stygian things are populous. Green things are stygian. If something is lacteal and not stygian then it is carroty. Aile is not carroty.", "logic": "\nBragging(tyler)\nOmniscient(fianna)\nLacteal(joellyn)\nOmniscient(aile)\nforall x (Bragging(x) -> Headed(x))\nforall x (Populous(x) and Omniscient(x) -> Lacteal(x))\nforall x (Stygian(x) and Omniscient(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Stygian(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and not Stygian(x) -> Carroty(x))\n\nnot Carroty(aile)\n\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and not Stygian(x) -> Carroty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Tate is coniferous. Irving is voluble. Jay is cuttable. Zachary is voluble. If something is coniferous then it is inconstant. Nice, voluble things are cuttable. If something is outclassed and voluble then it is monotypic. All outclassed things are monotypic. Green things are outclassed. If something is cuttable and not outclassed then it is nonextant. Tate is nonextant.", "logic": "\nConiferous(tate)\nVoluble(irving)\nCuttable(jay)\nVoluble(zachary)\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> Inconstant(x))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and Voluble(x) -> Cuttable(x))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) and Voluble(x) -> Monotypic(x))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) -> Monotypic(x))\nforall x (Voluble(x) -> Outclassed(x))\nforall x (Cuttable(x) and not Outclassed(x) -> Nonextant(x))\n\nNonextant(tate)\n\nforall x (Cuttable(x) and not Outclassed(x) -> Nonextant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Bertie is catacorner. Dion is pyogenic. Friedric is acidulous. Donny is pyogenic. If something is catacorner then it is succeeding. Nice, pyogenic things are acidulous. If something is conversant and pyogenic then it is puerile. All conversant things are puerile. Green things are conversant. If something is acidulous and not conversant then it is mercerised. Bertie is not pyogenic.", "logic": "\nCatacorner(bertie)\nPyogenic(dion)\nAcidulous(friedric)\nPyogenic(donny)\nforall x (Catacorner(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) and Pyogenic(x) -> Acidulous(x))\nforall x (Conversant(x) and Pyogenic(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Conversant(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Acidulous(x) and not Conversant(x) -> Mercerised(x))\n\nnot Pyogenic(bertie)\n\nnot Pyogenic(bertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Marlowe is unstinting. Nana is barbarian. Phillipp is cordial. Elana is barbarian. If something is unstinting then it is negro. Nice, barbarian things are cordial. If something is unready and barbarian then it is stellar. All unready things are stellar. Green things are unready. If something is cordial and not unready then it is busy. Nana is unstinting.", "logic": "\nUnstinting(marlowe)\nBarbarian(nana)\nCordial(phillipp)\nBarbarian(elana)\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Negro(x))\nforall x (Stellar(x) and Barbarian(x) -> Cordial(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Barbarian(x) -> Stellar(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Stellar(x))\nforall x (Barbarian(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Cordial(x) and not Unready(x) -> Busy(x))\n\nUnstinting(nana)\n\nUnstinting(nana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Ferd is tenable. Sol is bitchy. Niccolo is french. Parker is bitchy. If something is tenable then it is empty. Nice, bitchy things are french. If something is canorous and bitchy then it is homostylic. All canorous things are homostylic. Green things are canorous. If something is french and not canorous then it is horrifying. Niccolo is not bitchy.", "logic": "\nTenable(ferd)\nBitchy(sol)\nFrench(niccolo)\nBitchy(parker)\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Empty(x))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) and Bitchy(x) -> French(x))\nforall x (Canorous(x) and Bitchy(x) -> Homostylic(x))\nforall x (Canorous(x) -> Homostylic(x))\nforall x (Bitchy(x) -> Canorous(x))\nforall x (French(x) and not Canorous(x) -> Horrifying(x))\n\nnot Bitchy(niccolo)\n\nnot Bitchy(niccolo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Tymothy is croupy. Aloisia is bleached. Lamont is unpassable. Amaleta is bleached. If something is croupy then it is animated. Nice, bleached things are unpassable. If something is antitumor and bleached then it is laced. All antitumor things are laced. Green things are antitumor. If something is unpassable and not antitumor then it is ahorseback. Amaleta is croupy.", "logic": "\nCroupy(tymothy)\nBleached(aloisia)\nUnpassable(lamont)\nBleached(amaleta)\nforall x (Croupy(x) -> Animated(x))\nforall x (Laced(x) and Bleached(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) and Bleached(x) -> Laced(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) -> Laced(x))\nforall x (Bleached(x) -> Antitumor(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) and not Antitumor(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\n\nCroupy(amaleta)\n\nCroupy(amaleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Mei is bigeminal. Suki is knifelike. Caritta is liverish. Caritta is caudate. Caritta is grieving. Gerda is tonsured. Gerda is caudate. Gerda is grieving. Gerda is not bigeminal. Gerda is not tentacular. If someone is tentacular then they are not liverish. If someone is knifelike and tonsured then they are liverish. If Caritta is knifelike and Caritta is grieving then Caritta is not tentacular. Big, liverish people are grieving. Round, liverish people are caudate. If Mei is tentacular then Mei is not grieving. All knifelike people are tonsured. If Gerda is bigeminal and Gerda is not caudate then Gerda is grieving. Caritta is liverish.", "logic": "\nBigeminal(mei)\nKnifelike(suki)\nLiverish(caritta)\nCaudate(caritta)\nGrieving(caritta)\nTonsured(gerda)\nCaudate(gerda)\nGrieving(gerda)\nnot Bigeminal(gerda)\nnot Tentacular(gerda)\nforall x (Tentacular(x) -> not Liverish(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) and Tonsured(x) -> Liverish(x))\nKnifelike(caritta) and Grieving(caritta) -> not Tentacular(caritta)\nforall x (Knifelike(x) and Liverish(x) -> Grieving(x))\nforall x (Tentacular(x) and Liverish(x) -> Caudate(x))\nTentacular(mei) -> not Grieving(mei)\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Tonsured(x))\nBigeminal(gerda) and not Caudate(gerda) -> Grieving(gerda)\n\nLiverish(caritta)\n\ntherefore Liverish(caritta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Malcah is regnant. Dareen is spongelike. Elka is quaternary. Elka is reliable. Elka is tallish. Janice is throwaway. Janice is reliable. Janice is tallish. Janice is not regnant. Janice is not luscious. If someone is luscious then they are not quaternary. If someone is spongelike and throwaway then they are quaternary. If Elka is spongelike and Elka is tallish then Elka is not luscious. Big, quaternary people are tallish. Round, quaternary people are reliable. If Malcah is luscious then Malcah is not tallish. All spongelike people are throwaway. If Janice is regnant and Janice is not reliable then Janice is tallish. Janice is not reliable.", "logic": "\nRegnant(malcah)\nSpongelike(dareen)\nQuaternary(elka)\nReliable(elka)\nTallish(elka)\nThrowaway(janice)\nReliable(janice)\nTallish(janice)\nnot Regnant(janice)\nnot Luscious(janice)\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> not Quaternary(x))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) and Throwaway(x) -> Quaternary(x))\nSpongelike(elka) and Tallish(elka) -> not Luscious(elka)\nforall x (Spongelike(x) and Quaternary(x) -> Tallish(x))\nforall x (Luscious(x) and Quaternary(x) -> Reliable(x))\nLuscious(malcah) -> not Tallish(malcah)\nforall x (Spongelike(x) -> Throwaway(x))\nRegnant(janice) and not Reliable(janice) -> Tallish(janice)\n\nnot Reliable(janice)\n\ntherefore Reliable(janice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Xylia is ripe. Joachim is satiated. Yolanda is faint. Yolanda is unsocial. Yolanda is barehanded. Mirna is explicit. Mirna is unsocial. Mirna is barehanded. Mirna is not ripe. Mirna is not dislikable. If someone is dislikable then they are not faint. If someone is satiated and explicit then they are faint. If Yolanda is satiated and Yolanda is barehanded then Yolanda is not dislikable. Big, faint people are barehanded. Round, faint people are unsocial. If Xylia is dislikable then Xylia is not barehanded. All satiated people are explicit. If Mirna is ripe and Mirna is not unsocial then Mirna is barehanded. Joachim is explicit.", "logic": "\nRipe(xylia)\nSatiated(joachim)\nFaint(yolanda)\nUnsocial(yolanda)\nBarehanded(yolanda)\nExplicit(mirna)\nUnsocial(mirna)\nBarehanded(mirna)\nnot Ripe(mirna)\nnot Dislikable(mirna)\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> not Faint(x))\nforall x (Satiated(x) and Explicit(x) -> Faint(x))\nSatiated(yolanda) and Barehanded(yolanda) -> not Dislikable(yolanda)\nforall x (Satiated(x) and Faint(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Dislikable(x) and Faint(x) -> Unsocial(x))\nDislikable(xylia) -> not Barehanded(xylia)\nforall x (Satiated(x) -> Explicit(x))\nRipe(mirna) and not Unsocial(mirna) -> Barehanded(mirna)\n\nExplicit(joachim)\n\nSatiated(joachim) and forall x (Satiated(x) -> Explicit(x)) -> therefore Explicit(joachim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Owen is acarpous. Onida is alvine. Helmuth is uncaring. Helmuth is courteous. Helmuth is doddery. Caril is projected. Caril is courteous. Caril is doddery. Caril is not acarpous. Caril is not comic. If someone is comic then they are not uncaring. If someone is alvine and projected then they are uncaring. If Helmuth is alvine and Helmuth is doddery then Helmuth is not comic. Big, uncaring people are doddery. Round, uncaring people are courteous. If Owen is comic then Owen is not doddery. All alvine people are projected. If Caril is acarpous and Caril is not courteous then Caril is doddery. Onida is not projected.", "logic": "\nAcarpous(owen)\nAlvine(onida)\nUncaring(helmuth)\nCourteous(helmuth)\nDoddery(helmuth)\nProjected(caril)\nCourteous(caril)\nDoddery(caril)\nnot Acarpous(caril)\nnot Comic(caril)\nforall x (Comic(x) -> not Uncaring(x))\nforall x (Alvine(x) and Projected(x) -> Uncaring(x))\nAlvine(helmuth) and Doddery(helmuth) -> not Comic(helmuth)\nforall x (Alvine(x) and Uncaring(x) -> Doddery(x))\nforall x (Comic(x) and Uncaring(x) -> Courteous(x))\nComic(owen) -> not Doddery(owen)\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Projected(x))\nAcarpous(caril) and not Courteous(caril) -> Doddery(caril)\n\nnot Projected(onida)\n\nAlvine(onida) and forall x (Alvine(x) -> Projected(x)) -> therefore Projected(onida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Lacey is fractional. Karly is carbonous. Trey is saving. Trey is oozy. Trey is zoic. Leonhard is frightful. Leonhard is oozy. Leonhard is zoic. Leonhard is not fractional. Leonhard is not superior. If someone is superior then they are not saving. If someone is carbonous and frightful then they are saving. If Trey is carbonous and Trey is zoic then Trey is not superior. Big, saving people are zoic. Round, saving people are oozy. If Lacey is superior then Lacey is not zoic. All carbonous people are frightful. If Leonhard is fractional and Leonhard is not oozy then Leonhard is zoic. Karly is saving.", "logic": "\nFractional(lacey)\nCarbonous(karly)\nSaving(trey)\nOozy(trey)\nZoic(trey)\nFrightful(leonhard)\nOozy(leonhard)\nZoic(leonhard)\nnot Fractional(leonhard)\nnot Superior(leonhard)\nforall x (Superior(x) -> not Saving(x))\nforall x (Carbonous(x) and Frightful(x) -> Saving(x))\nCarbonous(trey) and Zoic(trey) -> not Superior(trey)\nforall x (Carbonous(x) and Saving(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Superior(x) and Saving(x) -> Oozy(x))\nSuperior(lacey) -> not Zoic(lacey)\nforall x (Carbonous(x) -> Frightful(x))\nFractional(leonhard) and not Oozy(leonhard) -> Zoic(leonhard)\n\nSaving(karly)\n\nCarbonous(karly) and forall x (Carbonous(x) -> Frightful(x)) -> therefore Frightful(karly) Carbonous(karly) and Frightful(karly) and forall x (Carbonous(x) and Frightful(x) -> Saving(x)) -> therefore Saving(karly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Alphonso is partizan. Easton is torrid. Carlie is mensural. Carlie is unploughed. Carlie is woodsy. Cecilia is wavering. Cecilia is unploughed. Cecilia is woodsy. Cecilia is not partizan. Cecilia is not dread. If someone is dread then they are not mensural. If someone is torrid and wavering then they are mensural. If Carlie is torrid and Carlie is woodsy then Carlie is not dread. Big, mensural people are woodsy. Round, mensural people are unploughed. If Alphonso is dread then Alphonso is not woodsy. All torrid people are wavering. If Cecilia is partizan and Cecilia is not unploughed then Cecilia is woodsy. Easton is not mensural.", "logic": "\nPartizan(alphonso)\nTorrid(easton)\nMensural(carlie)\nUnploughed(carlie)\nWoodsy(carlie)\nWavering(cecilia)\nUnploughed(cecilia)\nWoodsy(cecilia)\nnot Partizan(cecilia)\nnot Dread(cecilia)\nforall x (Dread(x) -> not Mensural(x))\nforall x (Torrid(x) and Wavering(x) -> Mensural(x))\nTorrid(carlie) and Woodsy(carlie) -> not Dread(carlie)\nforall x (Torrid(x) and Mensural(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Dread(x) and Mensural(x) -> Unploughed(x))\nDread(alphonso) -> not Woodsy(alphonso)\nforall x (Torrid(x) -> Wavering(x))\nPartizan(cecilia) and not Unploughed(cecilia) -> Woodsy(cecilia)\n\nnot Mensural(easton)\n\nTorrid(easton) and forall x (Torrid(x) -> Wavering(x)) -> therefore Wavering(easton) Torrid(easton) and Wavering(easton) and forall x (Torrid(x) and Wavering(x) -> Mensural(x)) -> therefore Mensural(easton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Jamie is damned. Pat is morphemic. Eugene is wondering. Eugene is gyral. Eugene is beery. Paton is viscous. Paton is gyral. Paton is beery. Paton is not damned. Paton is not ignitible. If someone is ignitible then they are not wondering. If someone is morphemic and viscous then they are wondering. If Eugene is morphemic and Eugene is beery then Eugene is not ignitible. Big, wondering people are beery. Round, wondering people are gyral. If Jamie is ignitible then Jamie is not beery. All morphemic people are viscous. If Paton is damned and Paton is not gyral then Paton is beery. Pat is beery.", "logic": "\nDamned(jamie)\nMorphemic(pat)\nWondering(eugene)\nGyral(eugene)\nBeery(eugene)\nViscous(paton)\nGyral(paton)\nBeery(paton)\nnot Damned(paton)\nnot Ignitible(paton)\nforall x (Ignitible(x) -> not Wondering(x))\nforall x (Morphemic(x) and Viscous(x) -> Wondering(x))\nMorphemic(eugene) and Beery(eugene) -> not Ignitible(eugene)\nforall x (Morphemic(x) and Wondering(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Wondering(x) -> Gyral(x))\nIgnitible(jamie) -> not Beery(jamie)\nforall x (Morphemic(x) -> Viscous(x))\nDamned(paton) and not Gyral(paton) -> Beery(paton)\n\nBeery(pat)\n\nMorphemic(pat) and forall x (Morphemic(x) -> Viscous(x)) -> therefore Viscous(pat) Morphemic(pat) and Viscous(pat) and forall x (Morphemic(x) and Viscous(x) -> Wondering(x)) -> therefore Wondering(pat) Morphemic(pat) and Wondering(pat) and forall x (Morphemic(x) and Wondering(x) -> Beery(x)) -> therefore Beery(pat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Merola is hebrew. Silvain is disfigured. Berni is continuing. Berni is raining. Berni is nordic. Blanca is potent. Blanca is raining. Blanca is nordic. Blanca is not hebrew. Blanca is not turbinate. If someone is turbinate then they are not continuing. If someone is disfigured and potent then they are continuing. If Berni is disfigured and Berni is nordic then Berni is not turbinate. Big, continuing people are nordic. Round, continuing people are raining. If Merola is turbinate then Merola is not nordic. All disfigured people are potent. If Blanca is hebrew and Blanca is not raining then Blanca is nordic. Silvain is not nordic.", "logic": "\nHebrew(merola)\nDisfigured(silvain)\nContinuing(berni)\nRaining(berni)\nNordic(berni)\nPotent(blanca)\nRaining(blanca)\nNordic(blanca)\nnot Hebrew(blanca)\nnot Turbinate(blanca)\nforall x (Turbinate(x) -> not Continuing(x))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) and Potent(x) -> Continuing(x))\nDisfigured(berni) and Nordic(berni) -> not Turbinate(berni)\nforall x (Disfigured(x) and Continuing(x) -> Nordic(x))\nforall x (Turbinate(x) and Continuing(x) -> Raining(x))\nTurbinate(merola) -> not Nordic(merola)\nforall x (Disfigured(x) -> Potent(x))\nHebrew(blanca) and not Raining(blanca) -> Nordic(blanca)\n\nnot Nordic(silvain)\n\nDisfigured(silvain) and forall x (Disfigured(x) -> Potent(x)) -> therefore Potent(silvain) Disfigured(silvain) and Potent(silvain) and forall x (Disfigured(x) and Potent(x) -> Continuing(x)) -> therefore Continuing(silvain) Disfigured(silvain) and Continuing(silvain) and forall x (Disfigured(x) and Continuing(x) -> Nordic(x)) -> therefore Nordic(silvain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Anna is younger. Urbain is antitank. Denis is late. Denis is fleet. Denis is arguable. Kalila is inshore. Kalila is fleet. Kalila is arguable. Kalila is not younger. Kalila is not undated. If someone is undated then they are not late. If someone is antitank and inshore then they are late. If Denis is antitank and Denis is arguable then Denis is not undated. Big, late people are arguable. Round, late people are fleet. If Anna is undated then Anna is not arguable. All antitank people are inshore. If Kalila is younger and Kalila is not fleet then Kalila is arguable. Anna is not inshore.", "logic": "\nYounger(anna)\nAntitank(urbain)\nLate(denis)\nFleet(denis)\nArguable(denis)\nInshore(kalila)\nFleet(kalila)\nArguable(kalila)\nnot Younger(kalila)\nnot Undated(kalila)\nforall x (Undated(x) -> not Late(x))\nforall x (Antitank(x) and Inshore(x) -> Late(x))\nAntitank(denis) and Arguable(denis) -> not Undated(denis)\nforall x (Antitank(x) and Late(x) -> Arguable(x))\nforall x (Undated(x) and Late(x) -> Fleet(x))\nUndated(anna) -> not Arguable(anna)\nforall x (Antitank(x) -> Inshore(x))\nYounger(kalila) and not Fleet(kalila) -> Arguable(kalila)\n\nnot Inshore(anna)\n\nforall x (Antitank(x) -> Inshore(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Isabel is sacculated. Andie is exoergic. Igor is tipsy. Igor is flustered. Igor is acinous. Sari is accredited. Sari is flustered. Sari is acinous. Sari is not sacculated. Sari is not pluperfect. If someone is pluperfect then they are not tipsy. If someone is exoergic and accredited then they are tipsy. If Igor is exoergic and Igor is acinous then Igor is not pluperfect. Big, tipsy people are acinous. Round, tipsy people are flustered. If Isabel is pluperfect then Isabel is not acinous. All exoergic people are accredited. If Sari is sacculated and Sari is not flustered then Sari is acinous. Andie is flustered.", "logic": "\nSacculated(isabel)\nExoergic(andie)\nTipsy(igor)\nFlustered(igor)\nAcinous(igor)\nAccredited(sari)\nFlustered(sari)\nAcinous(sari)\nnot Sacculated(sari)\nnot Pluperfect(sari)\nforall x (Pluperfect(x) -> not Tipsy(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) and Accredited(x) -> Tipsy(x))\nExoergic(igor) and Acinous(igor) -> not Pluperfect(igor)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) and Tipsy(x) -> Acinous(x))\nforall x (Pluperfect(x) and Tipsy(x) -> Flustered(x))\nPluperfect(isabel) -> not Acinous(isabel)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Accredited(x))\nSacculated(sari) and not Flustered(sari) -> Acinous(sari)\n\nFlustered(andie)\n\nforall x (Pluperfect(x) and Tipsy(x) -> Flustered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Tiebold is comal. Sadie is slavonic. Geo is victimized. Geo is stubborn. Geo is grasslike. Katie is fierce. Katie is stubborn. Katie is grasslike. Katie is not comal. Katie is not puffy. If someone is puffy then they are not victimized. If someone is slavonic and fierce then they are victimized. If Geo is slavonic and Geo is grasslike then Geo is not puffy. Big, victimized people are grasslike. Round, victimized people are stubborn. If Tiebold is puffy then Tiebold is not grasslike. All slavonic people are fierce. If Katie is comal and Katie is not stubborn then Katie is grasslike. Katie is not victimized.", "logic": "\nComal(tiebold)\nSlavonic(sadie)\nVictimized(geo)\nStubborn(geo)\nGrasslike(geo)\nFierce(katie)\nStubborn(katie)\nGrasslike(katie)\nnot Comal(katie)\nnot Puffy(katie)\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> not Victimized(x))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and Fierce(x) -> Victimized(x))\nSlavonic(geo) and Grasslike(geo) -> not Puffy(geo)\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and Victimized(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Puffy(x) and Victimized(x) -> Stubborn(x))\nPuffy(tiebold) -> not Grasslike(tiebold)\nforall x (Slavonic(x) -> Fierce(x))\nComal(katie) and not Stubborn(katie) -> Grasslike(katie)\n\nnot Victimized(katie)\n\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and Fierce(x) -> Victimized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Zitella is laughable. Waldemar is piteous. Rubina is maximising. Rubina is naturistic. Rubina is thawed. Humphrey is avifaunal. Humphrey is naturistic. Humphrey is thawed. Humphrey is not laughable. Humphrey is not knightly. If someone is knightly then they are not maximising. If someone is piteous and avifaunal then they are maximising. If Rubina is piteous and Rubina is thawed then Rubina is not knightly. Big, maximising people are thawed. Round, maximising people are naturistic. If Zitella is knightly then Zitella is not thawed. All piteous people are avifaunal. If Humphrey is laughable and Humphrey is not naturistic then Humphrey is thawed. Zitella is maximising.", "logic": "\nLaughable(zitella)\nPiteous(waldemar)\nMaximising(rubina)\nNaturistic(rubina)\nThawed(rubina)\nAvifaunal(humphrey)\nNaturistic(humphrey)\nThawed(humphrey)\nnot Laughable(humphrey)\nnot Knightly(humphrey)\nforall x (Knightly(x) -> not Maximising(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Avifaunal(x) -> Maximising(x))\nPiteous(rubina) and Thawed(rubina) -> not Knightly(rubina)\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Maximising(x) -> Thawed(x))\nforall x (Knightly(x) and Maximising(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nKnightly(zitella) -> not Thawed(zitella)\nforall x (Piteous(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\nLaughable(humphrey) and not Naturistic(humphrey) -> Thawed(humphrey)\n\nMaximising(zitella)\n\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Avifaunal(x) -> Maximising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Levy is unwished. Zenia is bucolic. Illa is canonical. Illa is dandyish. Illa is instinct. Merlina is deferent. Merlina is dandyish. Merlina is instinct. Merlina is not unwished. Merlina is not unsheathed. If someone is unsheathed then they are not canonical. If someone is bucolic and deferent then they are canonical. If Illa is bucolic and Illa is instinct then Illa is not unsheathed. Big, canonical people are instinct. Round, canonical people are dandyish. If Levy is unsheathed then Levy is not instinct. All bucolic people are deferent. If Merlina is unwished and Merlina is not dandyish then Merlina is instinct. Levy is not bucolic.", "logic": "\nUnwished(levy)\nBucolic(zenia)\nCanonical(illa)\nDandyish(illa)\nInstinct(illa)\nDeferent(merlina)\nDandyish(merlina)\nInstinct(merlina)\nnot Unwished(merlina)\nnot Unsheathed(merlina)\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) -> not Canonical(x))\nforall x (Bucolic(x) and Deferent(x) -> Canonical(x))\nBucolic(illa) and Instinct(illa) -> not Unsheathed(illa)\nforall x (Bucolic(x) and Canonical(x) -> Instinct(x))\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) and Canonical(x) -> Dandyish(x))\nUnsheathed(levy) -> not Instinct(levy)\nforall x (Bucolic(x) -> Deferent(x))\nUnwished(merlina) and not Dandyish(merlina) -> Instinct(merlina)\n\nnot Bucolic(levy)\n\nnot Bucolic(levy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Stephine is precious. Pauly is mammoth. Noam is resinous. Noam is inflected. Noam is impious. Annalisa is jordanian. Annalisa is inflected. Annalisa is impious. Annalisa is not precious. Annalisa is not sniffy. If someone is sniffy then they are not resinous. If someone is mammoth and jordanian then they are resinous. If Noam is mammoth and Noam is impious then Noam is not sniffy. Big, resinous people are impious. Round, resinous people are inflected. If Stephine is sniffy then Stephine is not impious. All mammoth people are jordanian. If Annalisa is precious and Annalisa is not inflected then Annalisa is impious. Pauly is sniffy.", "logic": "\nPrecious(stephine)\nMammoth(pauly)\nResinous(noam)\nInflected(noam)\nImpious(noam)\nJordanian(annalisa)\nInflected(annalisa)\nImpious(annalisa)\nnot Precious(annalisa)\nnot Sniffy(annalisa)\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> not Resinous(x))\nforall x (Mammoth(x) and Jordanian(x) -> Resinous(x))\nMammoth(noam) and Impious(noam) -> not Sniffy(noam)\nforall x (Mammoth(x) and Resinous(x) -> Impious(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) and Resinous(x) -> Inflected(x))\nSniffy(stephine) -> not Impious(stephine)\nforall x (Mammoth(x) -> Jordanian(x))\nPrecious(annalisa) and not Inflected(annalisa) -> Impious(annalisa)\n\nSniffy(pauly)\n\nSniffy(pauly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Magda is idolized. Kaitlynn is basal. Tarrant is pemphigous. Tarrant is thirteen. Tarrant is rapturous. Raynard is unoriented. Raynard is thirteen. Raynard is rapturous. Raynard is not idolized. Raynard is not choky. If someone is choky then they are not pemphigous. If someone is basal and unoriented then they are pemphigous. If Tarrant is basal and Tarrant is rapturous then Tarrant is not choky. Big, pemphigous people are rapturous. Round, pemphigous people are thirteen. If Magda is choky then Magda is not rapturous. All basal people are unoriented. If Raynard is idolized and Raynard is not thirteen then Raynard is rapturous. Tarrant is not choky.", "logic": "\nIdolized(magda)\nBasal(kaitlynn)\nPemphigous(tarrant)\nThirteen(tarrant)\nRapturous(tarrant)\nUnoriented(raynard)\nThirteen(raynard)\nRapturous(raynard)\nnot Idolized(raynard)\nnot Choky(raynard)\nforall x (Choky(x) -> not Pemphigous(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) and Unoriented(x) -> Pemphigous(x))\nBasal(tarrant) and Rapturous(tarrant) -> not Choky(tarrant)\nforall x (Basal(x) and Pemphigous(x) -> Rapturous(x))\nforall x (Choky(x) and Pemphigous(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nChoky(magda) -> not Rapturous(magda)\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Unoriented(x))\nIdolized(raynard) and not Thirteen(raynard) -> Rapturous(raynard)\n\nnot Choky(tarrant)\n\nnot Choky(tarrant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Carilyn is unheeded. Ilana is drizzly. Vinita is hangdog. Vinita is mucinoid. Vinita is beforehand. Jessa is cloze. Jessa is mucinoid. Jessa is beforehand. Jessa is not unheeded. Jessa is not trustful. If someone is trustful then they are not hangdog. If someone is drizzly and cloze then they are hangdog. If Vinita is drizzly and Vinita is beforehand then Vinita is not trustful. Big, hangdog people are beforehand. Round, hangdog people are mucinoid. If Carilyn is trustful then Carilyn is not beforehand. All drizzly people are cloze. If Jessa is unheeded and Jessa is not mucinoid then Jessa is beforehand. Ilana is unheeded.", "logic": "\nUnheeded(carilyn)\nDrizzly(ilana)\nHangdog(vinita)\nMucinoid(vinita)\nBeforehand(vinita)\nCloze(jessa)\nMucinoid(jessa)\nBeforehand(jessa)\nnot Unheeded(jessa)\nnot Trustful(jessa)\nforall x (Trustful(x) -> not Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Drizzly(x) and Cloze(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nDrizzly(vinita) and Beforehand(vinita) -> not Trustful(vinita)\nforall x (Drizzly(x) and Hangdog(x) -> Beforehand(x))\nforall x (Trustful(x) and Hangdog(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nTrustful(carilyn) -> not Beforehand(carilyn)\nforall x (Drizzly(x) -> Cloze(x))\nUnheeded(jessa) and not Mucinoid(jessa) -> Beforehand(jessa)\n\nUnheeded(ilana)\n\nUnheeded(ilana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "The lucila does not chase the tella. The tella slice the lucila. The tella apprise the lucila. If someone pressurise the tella and the tella slice the lucila then the lucila pressurise the tella. If someone is geodesical and leakproof then they visit the lucila. If someone slice the tella then the tella slice the lucila. If someone apprise the tella and they chase the tella then the tella apprise the lucila. If someone apprise the tella then the tella is not bistered. If the tella apprise the lucila then the tella pressurise the lucila. If someone apprise the tella and the tella does not chase the lucila then the tella pressurise the lucila. If someone pressurise the lucila then they like the tella. The tella apprise the lucila.", "logic": "\nnot Slice(lucila, tella)\nSlice(tella, lucila)\nApprise(tella, lucila)\nforall x (Pressurise(x, tella) and Slice(tella, lucila) -> Pressurise(lucila, tella))\nforall x (Geodesical(x) and Leakproof(x) -> Pressurise(x, lucila))\nforall x (Slice(x, tella) -> Slice(tella, lucila))\nforall x (Apprise(x, tella) and Slice(x, tella) -> Apprise(tella, lucila))\nforall x (Apprise(x, tella) -> not Bistered(tella))\nApprise(tella, lucila) -> Pressurise(tella, lucila)\nforall x (Apprise(x, tella) and not Slice(tella, lucila) -> Pressurise(tella, lucila))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, lucila) -> Apprise(x, tella))\n\nApprise(tella, lucila)\n\ntherefore Apprise(tella, lucila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The daryle does not chase the joselyn. The joselyn digitize the daryle. The joselyn decalcify the daryle. If someone ingrain the joselyn and the joselyn digitize the daryle then the daryle ingrain the joselyn. If someone is nonresiny and linguistic then they visit the daryle. If someone digitize the joselyn then the joselyn digitize the daryle. If someone decalcify the joselyn and they chase the joselyn then the joselyn decalcify the daryle. If someone decalcify the joselyn then the joselyn is not cordial. If the joselyn decalcify the daryle then the joselyn ingrain the daryle. If someone decalcify the joselyn and the joselyn does not chase the daryle then the joselyn ingrain the daryle. If someone ingrain the daryle then they like the joselyn. The joselyn does not like the daryle.", "logic": "\nnot Digitize(daryle, joselyn)\nDigitize(joselyn, daryle)\nDecalcify(joselyn, daryle)\nforall x (Ingrain(x, joselyn) and Digitize(joselyn, daryle) -> Ingrain(daryle, joselyn))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Linguistic(x) -> Ingrain(x, daryle))\nforall x (Digitize(x, joselyn) -> Digitize(joselyn, daryle))\nforall x (Decalcify(x, joselyn) and Digitize(x, joselyn) -> Decalcify(joselyn, daryle))\nforall x (Decalcify(x, joselyn) -> not Cordial(joselyn))\nDecalcify(joselyn, daryle) -> Ingrain(joselyn, daryle)\nforall x (Decalcify(x, joselyn) and not Digitize(joselyn, daryle) -> Ingrain(joselyn, daryle))\nforall x (Ingrain(x, daryle) -> Decalcify(x, joselyn))\n\nnot Decalcify(joselyn, daryle)\n\ntherefore Decalcify(joselyn, daryle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The samara does not chase the zuzana. The zuzana divagate the samara. The zuzana prompt the samara. If someone march the zuzana and the zuzana divagate the samara then the samara march the zuzana. If someone is homing and buggy then they visit the samara. If someone divagate the zuzana then the zuzana divagate the samara. If someone prompt the zuzana and they chase the zuzana then the zuzana prompt the samara. If someone prompt the zuzana then the zuzana is not agaze. If the zuzana prompt the samara then the zuzana march the samara. If someone prompt the zuzana and the zuzana does not chase the samara then the zuzana march the samara. If someone march the samara then they like the zuzana. The zuzana march the samara.", "logic": "\nnot Divagate(samara, zuzana)\nDivagate(zuzana, samara)\nPrompt(zuzana, samara)\nforall x (March(x, zuzana) and Divagate(zuzana, samara) -> March(samara, zuzana))\nforall x (Homing(x) and Buggy(x) -> March(x, samara))\nforall x (Divagate(x, zuzana) -> Divagate(zuzana, samara))\nforall x (Prompt(x, zuzana) and Divagate(x, zuzana) -> Prompt(zuzana, samara))\nforall x (Prompt(x, zuzana) -> not Agaze(zuzana))\nPrompt(zuzana, samara) -> March(zuzana, samara)\nforall x (Prompt(x, zuzana) and not Divagate(zuzana, samara) -> March(zuzana, samara))\nforall x (March(x, samara) -> Prompt(x, zuzana))\n\nMarch(zuzana, samara)\n\nPrompt(zuzana, samara) and Prompt(zuzana, samara) -> March(zuzana, samara) -> therefore March(zuzana, samara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The clarke does not chase the faythe. The faythe martyr the clarke. The faythe peal the clarke. If someone hoot the faythe and the faythe martyr the clarke then the clarke hoot the faythe. If someone is advance and biliary then they visit the clarke. If someone martyr the faythe then the faythe martyr the clarke. If someone peal the faythe and they chase the faythe then the faythe peal the clarke. If someone peal the faythe then the faythe is not cisalpine. If the faythe peal the clarke then the faythe hoot the clarke. If someone peal the faythe and the faythe does not chase the clarke then the faythe hoot the clarke. If someone hoot the clarke then they like the faythe. The faythe does not visit the clarke.", "logic": "\nnot Martyr(clarke, faythe)\nMartyr(faythe, clarke)\nPeal(faythe, clarke)\nforall x (Hoot(x, faythe) and Martyr(faythe, clarke) -> Hoot(clarke, faythe))\nforall x (Advance(x) and Biliary(x) -> Hoot(x, clarke))\nforall x (Martyr(x, faythe) -> Martyr(faythe, clarke))\nforall x (Peal(x, faythe) and Martyr(x, faythe) -> Peal(faythe, clarke))\nforall x (Peal(x, faythe) -> not Cisalpine(faythe))\nPeal(faythe, clarke) -> Hoot(faythe, clarke)\nforall x (Peal(x, faythe) and not Martyr(faythe, clarke) -> Hoot(faythe, clarke))\nforall x (Hoot(x, clarke) -> Peal(x, faythe))\n\nnot Hoot(faythe, clarke)\n\nPeal(faythe, clarke) and Peal(faythe, clarke) -> Hoot(faythe, clarke) -> therefore Hoot(faythe, clarke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The orazio does not chase the wynnie. The wynnie surprise the orazio. The wynnie ossify the orazio. If someone subscribe the wynnie and the wynnie surprise the orazio then the orazio subscribe the wynnie. If someone is downwind and speechless then they visit the orazio. If someone surprise the wynnie then the wynnie surprise the orazio. If someone ossify the wynnie and they chase the wynnie then the wynnie ossify the orazio. If someone ossify the wynnie then the wynnie is not hesitant. If the wynnie ossify the orazio then the wynnie subscribe the orazio. If someone ossify the wynnie and the wynnie does not chase the orazio then the wynnie subscribe the orazio. If someone subscribe the orazio then they like the wynnie. The wynnie ossify the wynnie.", "logic": "\nnot Surprise(orazio, wynnie)\nSurprise(wynnie, orazio)\nOssify(wynnie, orazio)\nforall x (Subscribe(x, wynnie) and Surprise(wynnie, orazio) -> Subscribe(orazio, wynnie))\nforall x (Downwind(x) and Speechless(x) -> Subscribe(x, orazio))\nforall x (Surprise(x, wynnie) -> Surprise(wynnie, orazio))\nforall x (Ossify(x, wynnie) and Surprise(x, wynnie) -> Ossify(wynnie, orazio))\nforall x (Ossify(x, wynnie) -> not Hesitant(wynnie))\nOssify(wynnie, orazio) -> Subscribe(wynnie, orazio)\nforall x (Ossify(x, wynnie) and not Surprise(wynnie, orazio) -> Subscribe(wynnie, orazio))\nforall x (Subscribe(x, orazio) -> Ossify(x, wynnie))\n\nOssify(wynnie, wynnie)\n\nOssify(wynnie, orazio) and Ossify(wynnie, orazio) -> Subscribe(wynnie, orazio) -> therefore Subscribe(wynnie, orazio) Subscribe(wynnie, orazio) and forall x (Subscribe(x, orazio) -> Ossify(x, wynnie)) -> therefore Ossify(wynnie, wynnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The sharleen does not chase the suzanna. The suzanna home the sharleen. The suzanna gangrene the sharleen. If someone confirm the suzanna and the suzanna home the sharleen then the sharleen confirm the suzanna. If someone is unbalanced and chelonian then they visit the sharleen. If someone home the suzanna then the suzanna home the sharleen. If someone gangrene the suzanna and they chase the suzanna then the suzanna gangrene the sharleen. If someone gangrene the suzanna then the suzanna is not oriented. If the suzanna gangrene the sharleen then the suzanna confirm the sharleen. If someone gangrene the suzanna and the suzanna does not chase the sharleen then the suzanna confirm the sharleen. If someone confirm the sharleen then they like the suzanna. The suzanna does not like the suzanna.", "logic": "\nnot Home(sharleen, suzanna)\nHome(suzanna, sharleen)\nGangrene(suzanna, sharleen)\nforall x (Confirm(x, suzanna) and Home(suzanna, sharleen) -> Confirm(sharleen, suzanna))\nforall x (Unbalanced(x) and Chelonian(x) -> Confirm(x, sharleen))\nforall x (Home(x, suzanna) -> Home(suzanna, sharleen))\nforall x (Gangrene(x, suzanna) and Home(x, suzanna) -> Gangrene(suzanna, sharleen))\nforall x (Gangrene(x, suzanna) -> not Oriented(suzanna))\nGangrene(suzanna, sharleen) -> Confirm(suzanna, sharleen)\nforall x (Gangrene(x, suzanna) and not Home(suzanna, sharleen) -> Confirm(suzanna, sharleen))\nforall x (Confirm(x, sharleen) -> Gangrene(x, suzanna))\n\nnot Gangrene(suzanna, suzanna)\n\nGangrene(suzanna, sharleen) and Gangrene(suzanna, sharleen) -> Confirm(suzanna, sharleen) -> therefore Confirm(suzanna, sharleen) Confirm(suzanna, sharleen) and forall x (Confirm(x, sharleen) -> Gangrene(x, suzanna)) -> therefore Gangrene(suzanna, suzanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The laure does not chase the brenn. The brenn environ the laure. The brenn wangle the laure. If someone pigeonhole the brenn and the brenn environ the laure then the laure pigeonhole the brenn. If someone is integral and tectonic then they visit the laure. If someone environ the brenn then the brenn environ the laure. If someone wangle the brenn and they chase the brenn then the brenn wangle the laure. If someone wangle the brenn then the brenn is not solved. If the brenn wangle the laure then the brenn pigeonhole the laure. If someone wangle the brenn and the brenn does not chase the laure then the brenn pigeonhole the laure. If someone pigeonhole the laure then they like the brenn. The brenn is not solved.", "logic": "\nnot Environ(laure, brenn)\nEnviron(brenn, laure)\nWangle(brenn, laure)\nforall x (Pigeonhole(x, brenn) and Environ(brenn, laure) -> Pigeonhole(laure, brenn))\nforall x (Integral(x) and Tectonic(x) -> Pigeonhole(x, laure))\nforall x (Environ(x, brenn) -> Environ(brenn, laure))\nforall x (Wangle(x, brenn) and Environ(x, brenn) -> Wangle(brenn, laure))\nforall x (Wangle(x, brenn) -> not Solved(brenn))\nWangle(brenn, laure) -> Pigeonhole(brenn, laure)\nforall x (Wangle(x, brenn) and not Environ(brenn, laure) -> Pigeonhole(brenn, laure))\nforall x (Pigeonhole(x, laure) -> Wangle(x, brenn))\n\nnot Solved(brenn)\n\nWangle(brenn, laure) and Wangle(brenn, laure) -> Pigeonhole(brenn, laure) -> therefore Pigeonhole(brenn, laure) Pigeonhole(brenn, laure) and forall x (Pigeonhole(x, laure) -> Wangle(x, brenn)) -> therefore Wangle(brenn, brenn) Wangle(brenn, brenn) and forall x (Wangle(x, brenn) -> not Solved(brenn)) -> therefore not Solved(brenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The josepha does not chase the maynard. The maynard unwrap the josepha. The maynard stump the josepha. If someone teetotal the maynard and the maynard unwrap the josepha then the josepha teetotal the maynard. If someone is galactic and araneidan then they visit the josepha. If someone unwrap the maynard then the maynard unwrap the josepha. If someone stump the maynard and they chase the maynard then the maynard stump the josepha. If someone stump the maynard then the maynard is not fourteenth. If the maynard stump the josepha then the maynard teetotal the josepha. If someone stump the maynard and the maynard does not chase the josepha then the maynard teetotal the josepha. If someone teetotal the josepha then they like the maynard. The maynard is fourteenth.", "logic": "\nnot Unwrap(josepha, maynard)\nUnwrap(maynard, josepha)\nStump(maynard, josepha)\nforall x (Teetotal(x, maynard) and Unwrap(maynard, josepha) -> Teetotal(josepha, maynard))\nforall x (Galactic(x) and Araneidan(x) -> Teetotal(x, josepha))\nforall x (Unwrap(x, maynard) -> Unwrap(maynard, josepha))\nforall x (Stump(x, maynard) and Unwrap(x, maynard) -> Stump(maynard, josepha))\nforall x (Stump(x, maynard) -> not Fourteenth(maynard))\nStump(maynard, josepha) -> Teetotal(maynard, josepha)\nforall x (Stump(x, maynard) and not Unwrap(maynard, josepha) -> Teetotal(maynard, josepha))\nforall x (Teetotal(x, josepha) -> Stump(x, maynard))\n\nFourteenth(maynard)\n\nStump(maynard, josepha) and Stump(maynard, josepha) -> Teetotal(maynard, josepha) -> therefore Teetotal(maynard, josepha) Teetotal(maynard, josepha) and forall x (Teetotal(x, josepha) -> Stump(x, maynard)) -> therefore Stump(maynard, maynard) Stump(maynard, maynard) and forall x (Stump(x, maynard) -> not Fourteenth(maynard)) -> therefore not Fourteenth(maynard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The susan does not chase the beryl. The beryl scrutinise the susan. The beryl jerk the susan. If someone ingraft the beryl and the beryl scrutinise the susan then the susan ingraft the beryl. If someone is lithic and idolised then they visit the susan. If someone scrutinise the beryl then the beryl scrutinise the susan. If someone jerk the beryl and they chase the beryl then the beryl jerk the susan. If someone jerk the beryl then the beryl is not stalwart. If the beryl jerk the susan then the beryl ingraft the susan. If someone jerk the beryl and the beryl does not chase the susan then the beryl ingraft the susan. If someone ingraft the susan then they like the beryl. The susan does not visit the beryl.", "logic": "\nnot Scrutinise(susan, beryl)\nScrutinise(beryl, susan)\nJerk(beryl, susan)\nforall x (Ingraft(x, beryl) and Scrutinise(beryl, susan) -> Ingraft(susan, beryl))\nforall x (Lithic(x) and Idolised(x) -> Ingraft(x, susan))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, beryl) -> Scrutinise(beryl, susan))\nforall x (Jerk(x, beryl) and Scrutinise(x, beryl) -> Jerk(beryl, susan))\nforall x (Jerk(x, beryl) -> not Stalwart(beryl))\nJerk(beryl, susan) -> Ingraft(beryl, susan)\nforall x (Jerk(x, beryl) and not Scrutinise(beryl, susan) -> Ingraft(beryl, susan))\nforall x (Ingraft(x, susan) -> Jerk(x, beryl))\n\nnot Ingraft(susan, beryl)\n\nforall x (Ingraft(x, beryl) and Scrutinise(beryl, susan) -> Ingraft(susan, beryl)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The etheline does not chase the deloris. The deloris autotomise the etheline. The deloris unpin the etheline. If someone confine the deloris and the deloris autotomise the etheline then the etheline confine the deloris. If someone is veridical and grayish then they visit the etheline. If someone autotomise the deloris then the deloris autotomise the etheline. If someone unpin the deloris and they chase the deloris then the deloris unpin the etheline. If someone unpin the deloris then the deloris is not lowset. If the deloris unpin the etheline then the deloris confine the etheline. If someone unpin the deloris and the deloris does not chase the etheline then the deloris confine the etheline. If someone confine the etheline then they like the deloris. The etheline unpin the deloris.", "logic": "\nnot Autotomise(etheline, deloris)\nAutotomise(deloris, etheline)\nUnpin(deloris, etheline)\nforall x (Confine(x, deloris) and Autotomise(deloris, etheline) -> Confine(etheline, deloris))\nforall x (Veridical(x) and Grayish(x) -> Confine(x, etheline))\nforall x (Autotomise(x, deloris) -> Autotomise(deloris, etheline))\nforall x (Unpin(x, deloris) and Autotomise(x, deloris) -> Unpin(deloris, etheline))\nforall x (Unpin(x, deloris) -> not Lowset(deloris))\nUnpin(deloris, etheline) -> Confine(deloris, etheline)\nforall x (Unpin(x, deloris) and not Autotomise(deloris, etheline) -> Confine(deloris, etheline))\nforall x (Confine(x, etheline) -> Unpin(x, deloris))\n\nUnpin(etheline, deloris)\n\nforall x (Confine(x, etheline) -> Unpin(x, deloris)) <- forall x (Veridical(x) and Grayish(x) -> Confine(x, etheline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The laney does not chase the harris. The harris outcall the laney. The harris kennel the laney. If someone cocainise the harris and the harris outcall the laney then the laney cocainise the harris. If someone is inundated and gratis then they visit the laney. If someone outcall the harris then the harris outcall the laney. If someone kennel the harris and they chase the harris then the harris kennel the laney. If someone kennel the harris then the harris is not irish. If the harris kennel the laney then the harris cocainise the laney. If someone kennel the harris and the harris does not chase the laney then the harris cocainise the laney. If someone cocainise the laney then they like the harris. The laney does not visit the laney.", "logic": "\nnot Outcall(laney, harris)\nOutcall(harris, laney)\nKennel(harris, laney)\nforall x (Cocainise(x, harris) and Outcall(harris, laney) -> Cocainise(laney, harris))\nforall x (Inundated(x) and Gratis(x) -> Cocainise(x, laney))\nforall x (Outcall(x, harris) -> Outcall(harris, laney))\nforall x (Kennel(x, harris) and Outcall(x, harris) -> Kennel(harris, laney))\nforall x (Kennel(x, harris) -> not Irish(harris))\nKennel(harris, laney) -> Cocainise(harris, laney)\nforall x (Kennel(x, harris) and not Outcall(harris, laney) -> Cocainise(harris, laney))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, laney) -> Kennel(x, harris))\n\nnot Cocainise(laney, laney)\n\nforall x (Inundated(x) and Gratis(x) -> Cocainise(x, laney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The ketti does not chase the ingemar. The ingemar satisfy the ketti. The ingemar sacrifice the ketti. If someone summit the ingemar and the ingemar satisfy the ketti then the ketti summit the ingemar. If someone is mangy and salivary then they visit the ketti. If someone satisfy the ingemar then the ingemar satisfy the ketti. If someone sacrifice the ingemar and they chase the ingemar then the ingemar sacrifice the ketti. If someone sacrifice the ingemar then the ingemar is not outdated. If the ingemar sacrifice the ketti then the ingemar summit the ketti. If someone sacrifice the ingemar and the ingemar does not chase the ketti then the ingemar summit the ketti. If someone summit the ketti then they like the ingemar. The ketti satisfy the ketti.", "logic": "\nnot Satisfy(ketti, ingemar)\nSatisfy(ingemar, ketti)\nSacrifice(ingemar, ketti)\nforall x (Summit(x, ingemar) and Satisfy(ingemar, ketti) -> Summit(ketti, ingemar))\nforall x (Mangy(x) and Salivary(x) -> Summit(x, ketti))\nforall x (Satisfy(x, ingemar) -> Satisfy(ingemar, ketti))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, ingemar) and Satisfy(x, ingemar) -> Sacrifice(ingemar, ketti))\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, ingemar) -> not Outdated(ingemar))\nSacrifice(ingemar, ketti) -> Summit(ingemar, ketti)\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, ingemar) and not Satisfy(ingemar, ketti) -> Summit(ingemar, ketti))\nforall x (Summit(x, ketti) -> Sacrifice(x, ingemar))\n\nSatisfy(ketti, ketti)\n\nSatisfy(ketti, ketti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The winn does not chase the andrew. The andrew hopple the winn. The andrew inculcate the winn. If someone encode the andrew and the andrew hopple the winn then the winn encode the andrew. If someone is downstair and unhygienic then they visit the winn. If someone hopple the andrew then the andrew hopple the winn. If someone inculcate the andrew and they chase the andrew then the andrew inculcate the winn. If someone inculcate the andrew then the andrew is not evidenced. If the andrew inculcate the winn then the andrew encode the winn. If someone inculcate the andrew and the andrew does not chase the winn then the andrew encode the winn. If someone encode the winn then they like the andrew. The andrew is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Hopple(winn, andrew)\nHopple(andrew, winn)\nInculcate(andrew, winn)\nforall x (Encode(x, andrew) and Hopple(andrew, winn) -> Encode(winn, andrew))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Unhygienic(x) -> Encode(x, winn))\nforall x (Hopple(x, andrew) -> Hopple(andrew, winn))\nforall x (Inculcate(x, andrew) and Hopple(x, andrew) -> Inculcate(andrew, winn))\nforall x (Inculcate(x, andrew) -> not Evidenced(andrew))\nInculcate(andrew, winn) -> Encode(andrew, winn)\nforall x (Inculcate(x, andrew) and not Hopple(andrew, winn) -> Encode(andrew, winn))\nforall x (Encode(x, winn) -> Inculcate(x, andrew))\n\nnot Round(andrew)\n\nnot Round(andrew) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The alexia does not chase the osmond. The osmond enthrone the alexia. The osmond wield the alexia. If someone medicate the osmond and the osmond enthrone the alexia then the alexia medicate the osmond. If someone is overall and alvine then they visit the alexia. If someone enthrone the osmond then the osmond enthrone the alexia. If someone wield the osmond and they chase the osmond then the osmond wield the alexia. If someone wield the osmond then the osmond is not sexual. If the osmond wield the alexia then the osmond medicate the alexia. If someone wield the osmond and the osmond does not chase the alexia then the osmond medicate the alexia. If someone medicate the alexia then they like the osmond. The alexia is cold.", "logic": "\nnot Enthrone(alexia, osmond)\nEnthrone(osmond, alexia)\nWield(osmond, alexia)\nforall x (Medicate(x, osmond) and Enthrone(osmond, alexia) -> Medicate(alexia, osmond))\nforall x (Overall(x) and Alvine(x) -> Medicate(x, alexia))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, osmond) -> Enthrone(osmond, alexia))\nforall x (Wield(x, osmond) and Enthrone(x, osmond) -> Wield(osmond, alexia))\nforall x (Wield(x, osmond) -> not Sexual(osmond))\nWield(osmond, alexia) -> Medicate(osmond, alexia)\nforall x (Wield(x, osmond) and not Enthrone(osmond, alexia) -> Medicate(osmond, alexia))\nforall x (Medicate(x, alexia) -> Wield(x, osmond))\n\nCold(alexia)\n\nCold(alexia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The reyna does not chase the christina. The christina collate the reyna. The christina lunge the reyna. If someone tinct the christina and the christina collate the reyna then the reyna tinct the christina. If someone is cubist and frowzy then they visit the reyna. If someone collate the christina then the christina collate the reyna. If someone lunge the christina and they chase the christina then the christina lunge the reyna. If someone lunge the christina then the christina is not nicene. If the christina lunge the reyna then the christina tinct the reyna. If someone lunge the christina and the christina does not chase the reyna then the christina tinct the reyna. If someone tinct the reyna then they like the christina. The reyna is not frowzy.", "logic": "\nnot Collate(reyna, christina)\nCollate(christina, reyna)\nLunge(christina, reyna)\nforall x (Tinct(x, christina) and Collate(christina, reyna) -> Tinct(reyna, christina))\nforall x (Cubist(x) and Frowzy(x) -> Tinct(x, reyna))\nforall x (Collate(x, christina) -> Collate(christina, reyna))\nforall x (Lunge(x, christina) and Collate(x, christina) -> Lunge(christina, reyna))\nforall x (Lunge(x, christina) -> not Nicene(christina))\nLunge(christina, reyna) -> Tinct(christina, reyna)\nforall x (Lunge(x, christina) and not Collate(christina, reyna) -> Tinct(christina, reyna))\nforall x (Tinct(x, reyna) -> Lunge(x, christina))\n\nnot Frowzy(reyna)\n\nnot Frowzy(reyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The hogan does not chase the yovonnda. The yovonnda shrill the hogan. The yovonnda epoxy the hogan. If someone cradle the yovonnda and the yovonnda shrill the hogan then the hogan cradle the yovonnda. If someone is capacious and perishable then they visit the hogan. If someone shrill the yovonnda then the yovonnda shrill the hogan. If someone epoxy the yovonnda and they chase the yovonnda then the yovonnda epoxy the hogan. If someone epoxy the yovonnda then the yovonnda is not entranced. If the yovonnda epoxy the hogan then the yovonnda cradle the hogan. If someone epoxy the yovonnda and the yovonnda does not chase the hogan then the yovonnda cradle the hogan. If someone cradle the hogan then they like the yovonnda. The yovonnda shrill the yovonnda.", "logic": "\nnot Shrill(hogan, yovonnda)\nShrill(yovonnda, hogan)\nEpoxy(yovonnda, hogan)\nforall x (Cradle(x, yovonnda) and Shrill(yovonnda, hogan) -> Cradle(hogan, yovonnda))\nforall x (Capacious(x) and Perishable(x) -> Cradle(x, hogan))\nforall x (Shrill(x, yovonnda) -> Shrill(yovonnda, hogan))\nforall x (Epoxy(x, yovonnda) and Shrill(x, yovonnda) -> Epoxy(yovonnda, hogan))\nforall x (Epoxy(x, yovonnda) -> not Entranced(yovonnda))\nEpoxy(yovonnda, hogan) -> Cradle(yovonnda, hogan)\nforall x (Epoxy(x, yovonnda) and not Shrill(yovonnda, hogan) -> Cradle(yovonnda, hogan))\nforall x (Cradle(x, hogan) -> Epoxy(x, yovonnda))\n\nShrill(yovonnda, yovonnda)\n\nShrill(yovonnda, yovonnda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The kit analogise the annabel. The teddy is olfactive. The annabel is olfactive. If someone alcoholize the annabel and the annabel is serpentine then they see the teddy. If someone is serpentine then they chase the teddy. If someone is crossed and they eat the teddy then they see the teddy. If someone is lumpy then they chase the annabel. If someone analogise the annabel and they chase the annabel then the annabel analogise the kit. If someone analogise the annabel then they are lumpy. The annabel is olfactive.", "logic": "\nAnalogise(kit, annabel)\nOlfactive(teddy)\nOlfactive(annabel)\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, annabel) and Serpentine(annabel) -> Alcoholize(x, teddy))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Overrule(x, teddy))\nforall x (Crossed(x) and Analogise(x, teddy) -> Alcoholize(x, teddy))\nforall x (Lumpy(x) -> Overrule(x, annabel))\nforall x (Analogise(x, annabel) and Overrule(x, annabel) -> Analogise(annabel, kit))\nforall x (Analogise(x, annabel) -> Lumpy(x))\n\nOlfactive(annabel)\n\ntherefore Olfactive(annabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The agathe classify the winifield. The uri is openhanded. The winifield is openhanded. If someone renounce the winifield and the winifield is hiemal then they see the uri. If someone is hiemal then they chase the uri. If someone is incredible and they eat the uri then they see the uri. If someone is ergotic then they chase the winifield. If someone classify the winifield and they chase the winifield then the winifield classify the agathe. If someone classify the winifield then they are ergotic. The uri is not openhanded.", "logic": "\nClassify(agathe, winifield)\nOpenhanded(uri)\nOpenhanded(winifield)\nforall x (Renounce(x, winifield) and Hiemal(winifield) -> Renounce(x, uri))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Lumber(x, uri))\nforall x (Incredible(x) and Classify(x, uri) -> Renounce(x, uri))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) -> Lumber(x, winifield))\nforall x (Classify(x, winifield) and Lumber(x, winifield) -> Classify(winifield, agathe))\nforall x (Classify(x, winifield) -> Ergotic(x))\n\nnot Openhanded(uri)\n\ntherefore Openhanded(uri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The paolina package the violette. The ellette is trojan. The violette is trojan. If someone melodize the violette and the violette is xeric then they see the ellette. If someone is xeric then they chase the ellette. If someone is geniculate and they eat the ellette then they see the ellette. If someone is allotted then they chase the violette. If someone package the violette and they chase the violette then the violette package the paolina. If someone package the violette then they are allotted. The paolina is allotted.", "logic": "\nPackage(paolina, violette)\nTrojan(ellette)\nTrojan(violette)\nforall x (Melodize(x, violette) and Xeric(violette) -> Melodize(x, ellette))\nforall x (Xeric(x) -> Manacle(x, ellette))\nforall x (Geniculate(x) and Package(x, ellette) -> Melodize(x, ellette))\nforall x (Allotted(x) -> Manacle(x, violette))\nforall x (Package(x, violette) and Manacle(x, violette) -> Package(violette, paolina))\nforall x (Package(x, violette) -> Allotted(x))\n\nAllotted(paolina)\n\nPackage(paolina, violette) and forall x (Package(x, violette) -> Allotted(x)) -> therefore Allotted(paolina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The dom coact the silvie. The lurleen is hypnotized. The silvie is hypnotized. If someone whack the silvie and the silvie is disabled then they see the lurleen. If someone is disabled then they chase the lurleen. If someone is styptic and they eat the lurleen then they see the lurleen. If someone is salacious then they chase the silvie. If someone coact the silvie and they chase the silvie then the silvie coact the dom. If someone coact the silvie then they are salacious. The dom is not salacious.", "logic": "\nCoact(dom, silvie)\nHypnotized(lurleen)\nHypnotized(silvie)\nforall x (Whack(x, silvie) and Disabled(silvie) -> Whack(x, lurleen))\nforall x (Disabled(x) -> Stow(x, lurleen))\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Coact(x, lurleen) -> Whack(x, lurleen))\nforall x (Salacious(x) -> Stow(x, silvie))\nforall x (Coact(x, silvie) and Stow(x, silvie) -> Coact(silvie, dom))\nforall x (Coact(x, silvie) -> Salacious(x))\n\nnot Salacious(dom)\n\nCoact(dom, silvie) and forall x (Coact(x, silvie) -> Salacious(x)) -> therefore Salacious(dom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The lynette veer the dinny. The penelope is parametric. The dinny is parametric. If someone nosh the dinny and the dinny is human then they see the penelope. If someone is human then they chase the penelope. If someone is unquiet and they eat the penelope then they see the penelope. If someone is regional then they chase the dinny. If someone veer the dinny and they chase the dinny then the dinny veer the lynette. If someone veer the dinny then they are regional. The lynette bandage the dinny.", "logic": "\nVeer(lynette, dinny)\nParametric(penelope)\nParametric(dinny)\nforall x (Nosh(x, dinny) and Human(dinny) -> Nosh(x, penelope))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Bandage(x, penelope))\nforall x (Unquiet(x) and Veer(x, penelope) -> Nosh(x, penelope))\nforall x (Regional(x) -> Bandage(x, dinny))\nforall x (Veer(x, dinny) and Bandage(x, dinny) -> Veer(dinny, lynette))\nforall x (Veer(x, dinny) -> Regional(x))\n\nBandage(lynette, dinny)\n\nVeer(lynette, dinny) and forall x (Veer(x, dinny) -> Regional(x)) -> therefore Regional(lynette) Regional(lynette) and forall x (Regional(x) -> Bandage(x, dinny)) -> therefore Bandage(lynette, dinny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The bernete conserve the reynard. The mendel is sanguinary. The reynard is sanguinary. If someone vaunt the reynard and the reynard is surgical then they see the mendel. If someone is surgical then they chase the mendel. If someone is vehicular and they eat the mendel then they see the mendel. If someone is meet then they chase the reynard. If someone conserve the reynard and they chase the reynard then the reynard conserve the bernete. If someone conserve the reynard then they are meet. The bernete does not chase the reynard.", "logic": "\nConserve(bernete, reynard)\nSanguinary(mendel)\nSanguinary(reynard)\nforall x (Vaunt(x, reynard) and Surgical(reynard) -> Vaunt(x, mendel))\nforall x (Surgical(x) -> Aline(x, mendel))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) and Conserve(x, mendel) -> Vaunt(x, mendel))\nforall x (Meet(x) -> Aline(x, reynard))\nforall x (Conserve(x, reynard) and Aline(x, reynard) -> Conserve(reynard, bernete))\nforall x (Conserve(x, reynard) -> Meet(x))\n\nnot Aline(bernete, reynard)\n\nConserve(bernete, reynard) and forall x (Conserve(x, reynard) -> Meet(x)) -> therefore Meet(bernete) Meet(bernete) and forall x (Meet(x) -> Aline(x, reynard)) -> therefore Aline(bernete, reynard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The angelika please the miran. The tarrah is yemeni. The miran is yemeni. If someone bollix the miran and the miran is thirsty then they see the tarrah. If someone is thirsty then they chase the tarrah. If someone is crocked and they eat the tarrah then they see the tarrah. If someone is ectozoan then they chase the miran. If someone please the miran and they chase the miran then the miran please the angelika. If someone please the miran then they are ectozoan. The miran please the angelika.", "logic": "\nPlease(angelika, miran)\nYemeni(tarrah)\nYemeni(miran)\nforall x (Bollix(x, miran) and Thirsty(miran) -> Bollix(x, tarrah))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) -> Sonnet(x, tarrah))\nforall x (Crocked(x) and Please(x, tarrah) -> Bollix(x, tarrah))\nforall x (Ectozoan(x) -> Sonnet(x, miran))\nforall x (Please(x, miran) and Sonnet(x, miran) -> Please(miran, angelika))\nforall x (Please(x, miran) -> Ectozoan(x))\n\nPlease(miran, angelika)\n\nPlease(angelika, miran) and forall x (Please(x, miran) -> Ectozoan(x)) -> therefore Ectozoan(angelika) Ectozoan(angelika) and forall x (Ectozoan(x) -> Sonnet(x, miran)) -> therefore Sonnet(angelika, miran) Please(angelika, miran) and Sonnet(angelika, miran) and forall x (Please(x, miran) and Sonnet(x, miran) -> Please(miran, angelika)) -> therefore Please(miran, angelika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The elissa decollate the chrysler. The frederico is maddened. The chrysler is maddened. If someone reheat the chrysler and the chrysler is pass then they see the frederico. If someone is pass then they chase the frederico. If someone is hundredth and they eat the frederico then they see the frederico. If someone is sown then they chase the chrysler. If someone decollate the chrysler and they chase the chrysler then the chrysler decollate the elissa. If someone decollate the chrysler then they are sown. The chrysler does not eat the elissa.", "logic": "\nDecollate(elissa, chrysler)\nMaddened(frederico)\nMaddened(chrysler)\nforall x (Reheat(x, chrysler) and Pass(chrysler) -> Reheat(x, frederico))\nforall x (Pass(x) -> Winkle(x, frederico))\nforall x (Hundredth(x) and Decollate(x, frederico) -> Reheat(x, frederico))\nforall x (Sown(x) -> Winkle(x, chrysler))\nforall x (Decollate(x, chrysler) and Winkle(x, chrysler) -> Decollate(chrysler, elissa))\nforall x (Decollate(x, chrysler) -> Sown(x))\n\nnot Decollate(chrysler, elissa)\n\nDecollate(elissa, chrysler) and forall x (Decollate(x, chrysler) -> Sown(x)) -> therefore Sown(elissa) Sown(elissa) and forall x (Sown(x) -> Winkle(x, chrysler)) -> therefore Winkle(elissa, chrysler) Decollate(elissa, chrysler) and Winkle(elissa, chrysler) and forall x (Decollate(x, chrysler) and Winkle(x, chrysler) -> Decollate(chrysler, elissa)) -> therefore Decollate(chrysler, elissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The elene cabin the wolfgang. The marcos is eponymic. The wolfgang is eponymic. If someone recidivate the wolfgang and the wolfgang is matte then they see the marcos. If someone is matte then they chase the marcos. If someone is sodding and they eat the marcos then they see the marcos. If someone is unbleached then they chase the wolfgang. If someone cabin the wolfgang and they chase the wolfgang then the wolfgang cabin the elene. If someone cabin the wolfgang then they are unbleached. The wolfgang does not see the marcos.", "logic": "\nCabin(elene, wolfgang)\nEponymic(marcos)\nEponymic(wolfgang)\nforall x (Recidivate(x, wolfgang) and Matte(wolfgang) -> Recidivate(x, marcos))\nforall x (Matte(x) -> Recline(x, marcos))\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Cabin(x, marcos) -> Recidivate(x, marcos))\nforall x (Unbleached(x) -> Recline(x, wolfgang))\nforall x (Cabin(x, wolfgang) and Recline(x, wolfgang) -> Cabin(wolfgang, elene))\nforall x (Cabin(x, wolfgang) -> Unbleached(x))\n\nnot Recidivate(wolfgang, marcos)\n\nforall x (Recidivate(x, wolfgang) and Matte(wolfgang) -> Recidivate(x, marcos)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The erasmus sculpture the phillie. The yancy is cagey. The phillie is cagey. If someone curse the phillie and the phillie is rolling then they see the yancy. If someone is rolling then they chase the yancy. If someone is sunset and they eat the yancy then they see the yancy. If someone is unshaken then they chase the phillie. If someone sculpture the phillie and they chase the phillie then the phillie sculpture the erasmus. If someone sculpture the phillie then they are unshaken. The erasmus curse the yancy.", "logic": "\nSculpture(erasmus, phillie)\nCagey(yancy)\nCagey(phillie)\nforall x (Curse(x, phillie) and Rolling(phillie) -> Curse(x, yancy))\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Cartoon(x, yancy))\nforall x (Sunset(x) and Sculpture(x, yancy) -> Curse(x, yancy))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) -> Cartoon(x, phillie))\nforall x (Sculpture(x, phillie) and Cartoon(x, phillie) -> Sculpture(phillie, erasmus))\nforall x (Sculpture(x, phillie) -> Unshaken(x))\n\nCurse(erasmus, yancy)\n\nforall x (Curse(x, phillie) and Rolling(phillie) -> Curse(x, yancy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The herrmann slit the jerrilyn. The jami is magenta. The jerrilyn is magenta. If someone trademark the jerrilyn and the jerrilyn is bounden then they see the jami. If someone is bounden then they chase the jami. If someone is obsessive and they eat the jami then they see the jami. If someone is underived then they chase the jerrilyn. If someone slit the jerrilyn and they chase the jerrilyn then the jerrilyn slit the herrmann. If someone slit the jerrilyn then they are underived. The jami does not chase the jerrilyn.", "logic": "\nSlit(herrmann, jerrilyn)\nMagenta(jami)\nMagenta(jerrilyn)\nforall x (Trademark(x, jerrilyn) and Bounden(jerrilyn) -> Trademark(x, jami))\nforall x (Bounden(x) -> Canvass(x, jami))\nforall x (Obsessive(x) and Slit(x, jami) -> Trademark(x, jami))\nforall x (Underived(x) -> Canvass(x, jerrilyn))\nforall x (Slit(x, jerrilyn) and Canvass(x, jerrilyn) -> Slit(jerrilyn, herrmann))\nforall x (Slit(x, jerrilyn) -> Underived(x))\n\nnot Canvass(jami, jerrilyn)\n\nforall x (Underived(x) -> Canvass(x, jerrilyn)) <- forall x (Slit(x, jerrilyn) -> Underived(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The lida experience the sheldon. The sherie is warmed. The sheldon is warmed. If someone district the sheldon and the sheldon is wingless then they see the sherie. If someone is wingless then they chase the sherie. If someone is bulgarian and they eat the sherie then they see the sherie. If someone is whiskery then they chase the sheldon. If someone experience the sheldon and they chase the sheldon then the sheldon experience the lida. If someone experience the sheldon then they are whiskery. The sheldon calm the sherie.", "logic": "\nExperience(lida, sheldon)\nWarmed(sherie)\nWarmed(sheldon)\nforall x (District(x, sheldon) and Wingless(sheldon) -> District(x, sherie))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Calm(x, sherie))\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) and Experience(x, sherie) -> District(x, sherie))\nforall x (Whiskery(x) -> Calm(x, sheldon))\nforall x (Experience(x, sheldon) and Calm(x, sheldon) -> Experience(sheldon, lida))\nforall x (Experience(x, sheldon) -> Whiskery(x))\n\nCalm(sheldon, sherie)\n\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Calm(x, sherie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The belva pervade the randene. The deeanne is carsick. The randene is carsick. If someone hollow the randene and the randene is forgiving then they see the deeanne. If someone is forgiving then they chase the deeanne. If someone is biaural and they eat the deeanne then they see the deeanne. If someone is flippant then they chase the randene. If someone pervade the randene and they chase the randene then the randene pervade the belva. If someone pervade the randene then they are flippant. The deeanne is not blue.", "logic": "\nPervade(belva, randene)\nCarsick(deeanne)\nCarsick(randene)\nforall x (Hollow(x, randene) and Forgiving(randene) -> Hollow(x, deeanne))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> Bewail(x, deeanne))\nforall x (Biaural(x) and Pervade(x, deeanne) -> Hollow(x, deeanne))\nforall x (Flippant(x) -> Bewail(x, randene))\nforall x (Pervade(x, randene) and Bewail(x, randene) -> Pervade(randene, belva))\nforall x (Pervade(x, randene) -> Flippant(x))\n\nnot Blue(deeanne)\n\nnot Blue(deeanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The elie shamble the haily. The thom is pebbly. The haily is pebbly. If someone germinate the haily and the haily is serrate then they see the thom. If someone is serrate then they chase the thom. If someone is seasoned and they eat the thom then they see the thom. If someone is sclerosed then they chase the haily. If someone shamble the haily and they chase the haily then the haily shamble the elie. If someone shamble the haily then they are sclerosed. The haily germinate the haily.", "logic": "\nShamble(elie, haily)\nPebbly(thom)\nPebbly(haily)\nforall x (Germinate(x, haily) and Serrate(haily) -> Germinate(x, thom))\nforall x (Serrate(x) -> Surrender(x, thom))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) and Shamble(x, thom) -> Germinate(x, thom))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Surrender(x, haily))\nforall x (Shamble(x, haily) and Surrender(x, haily) -> Shamble(haily, elie))\nforall x (Shamble(x, haily) -> Sclerosed(x))\n\nGerminate(haily, haily)\n\nGerminate(haily, haily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The kathryn prearrange the evangelin. The paddie is unbitter. The evangelin is unbitter. If someone choose the evangelin and the evangelin is equivalent then they see the paddie. If someone is equivalent then they chase the paddie. If someone is changeless and they eat the paddie then they see the paddie. If someone is forehanded then they chase the evangelin. If someone prearrange the evangelin and they chase the evangelin then the evangelin prearrange the kathryn. If someone prearrange the evangelin then they are forehanded. The paddie is not changeless.", "logic": "\nPrearrange(kathryn, evangelin)\nUnbitter(paddie)\nUnbitter(evangelin)\nforall x (Choose(x, evangelin) and Equivalent(evangelin) -> Choose(x, paddie))\nforall x (Equivalent(x) -> Invent(x, paddie))\nforall x (Changeless(x) and Prearrange(x, paddie) -> Choose(x, paddie))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) -> Invent(x, evangelin))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, evangelin) and Invent(x, evangelin) -> Prearrange(evangelin, kathryn))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, evangelin) -> Forehanded(x))\n\nnot Changeless(paddie)\n\nnot Changeless(paddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The marylynne garment the lillian. The olle is banal. The lillian is banal. If someone hark the lillian and the lillian is gettable then they see the olle. If someone is gettable then they chase the olle. If someone is shorn and they eat the olle then they see the olle. If someone is slovenly then they chase the lillian. If someone garment the lillian and they chase the lillian then the lillian garment the marylynne. If someone garment the lillian then they are slovenly. The marylynne hark the lillian.", "logic": "\nGarment(marylynne, lillian)\nBanal(olle)\nBanal(lillian)\nforall x (Hark(x, lillian) and Gettable(lillian) -> Hark(x, olle))\nforall x (Gettable(x) -> Frazzle(x, olle))\nforall x (Shorn(x) and Garment(x, olle) -> Hark(x, olle))\nforall x (Slovenly(x) -> Frazzle(x, lillian))\nforall x (Garment(x, lillian) and Frazzle(x, lillian) -> Garment(lillian, marylynne))\nforall x (Garment(x, lillian) -> Slovenly(x))\n\nHark(marylynne, lillian)\n\nHark(marylynne, lillian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The belinda rustle the blinni. The deonne rustle the belinda. The rodie rustle the belinda. The rodie rustle the blinni. The rodie obtrude the blinni. The blinni is nonfatal. The blinni is cuddlesome. If the belinda ensile the rodie then the belinda is nonfatal. If something ensile the blinni and it is vesical then the blinni ensile the belinda. If the blinni obtrude the deonne then the deonne obtrude the blinni. If something obtrude the belinda then it obtrude the deonne. If something ensile the deonne then the deonne is subnormal. If something is nonfatal and it ensile the rodie then it rustle the belinda. If something rustle the blinni then it is subnormal. If something obtrude the blinni then the blinni obtrude the belinda. The rodie rustle the belinda.", "logic": "\nRustle(belinda, blinni)\nRustle(deonne, belinda)\nRustle(rodie, belinda)\nRustle(rodie, blinni)\nObtrude(rodie, blinni)\nNonfatal(blinni)\nCuddlesome(blinni)\nEnsile(belinda, rodie) -> Nonfatal(belinda)\nforall x (Ensile(x, blinni) and Vesical(x) -> Ensile(blinni, belinda))\nObtrude(blinni, deonne) -> Obtrude(deonne, blinni)\nforall x (Obtrude(x, belinda) -> Obtrude(x, deonne))\nforall x (Ensile(x, deonne) -> Subnormal(deonne))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) and Ensile(x, rodie) -> Rustle(x, belinda))\nforall x (Rustle(x, blinni) -> Subnormal(x))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, blinni) -> Obtrude(blinni, belinda))\n\nRustle(rodie, belinda)\n\ntherefore Rustle(rodie, belinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The orin tour the wenonah. The leighton tour the orin. The ethel tour the orin. The ethel tour the wenonah. The ethel outrival the wenonah. The wenonah is kampuchean. The wenonah is usual. If the orin blank the ethel then the orin is kampuchean. If something blank the wenonah and it is nonunion then the wenonah blank the orin. If the wenonah outrival the leighton then the leighton outrival the wenonah. If something outrival the orin then it outrival the leighton. If something blank the leighton then the leighton is mucoidal. If something is kampuchean and it blank the ethel then it tour the orin. If something tour the wenonah then it is mucoidal. If something outrival the wenonah then the wenonah outrival the orin. The ethel does not eat the wenonah.", "logic": "\nTour(orin, wenonah)\nTour(leighton, orin)\nTour(ethel, orin)\nTour(ethel, wenonah)\nOutrival(ethel, wenonah)\nKampuchean(wenonah)\nUsual(wenonah)\nBlank(orin, ethel) -> Kampuchean(orin)\nforall x (Blank(x, wenonah) and Nonunion(x) -> Blank(wenonah, orin))\nOutrival(wenonah, leighton) -> Outrival(leighton, wenonah)\nforall x (Outrival(x, orin) -> Outrival(x, leighton))\nforall x (Blank(x, leighton) -> Mucoidal(leighton))\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) and Blank(x, ethel) -> Tour(x, orin))\nforall x (Tour(x, wenonah) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Outrival(x, wenonah) -> Outrival(wenonah, orin))\n\nnot Tour(ethel, wenonah)\n\ntherefore Tour(ethel, wenonah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The shaina kotow the whit. The zea kotow the shaina. The baldwin kotow the shaina. The baldwin kotow the whit. The baldwin trespass the whit. The whit is analogous. The whit is future. If the shaina mercerize the baldwin then the shaina is analogous. If something mercerize the whit and it is premium then the whit mercerize the shaina. If the whit trespass the zea then the zea trespass the whit. If something trespass the shaina then it trespass the zea. If something mercerize the zea then the zea is mesmeric. If something is analogous and it mercerize the baldwin then it kotow the shaina. If something kotow the whit then it is mesmeric. If something trespass the whit then the whit trespass the shaina. The whit trespass the shaina.", "logic": "\nKotow(shaina, whit)\nKotow(zea, shaina)\nKotow(baldwin, shaina)\nKotow(baldwin, whit)\nTrespass(baldwin, whit)\nAnalogous(whit)\nFuture(whit)\nMercerize(shaina, baldwin) -> Analogous(shaina)\nforall x (Mercerize(x, whit) and Premium(x) -> Mercerize(whit, shaina))\nTrespass(whit, zea) -> Trespass(zea, whit)\nforall x (Trespass(x, shaina) -> Trespass(x, zea))\nforall x (Mercerize(x, zea) -> Mesmeric(zea))\nforall x (Analogous(x) and Mercerize(x, baldwin) -> Kotow(x, shaina))\nforall x (Kotow(x, whit) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Trespass(x, whit) -> Trespass(whit, shaina))\n\nTrespass(whit, shaina)\n\nTrespass(baldwin, whit) and forall x (Trespass(x, whit) -> Trespass(whit, shaina)) -> therefore Trespass(whit, shaina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The margareta refreshen the bernadina. The valentin refreshen the margareta. The mirabella refreshen the margareta. The mirabella refreshen the bernadina. The mirabella teargas the bernadina. The bernadina is leftish. The bernadina is lively. If the margareta redesign the mirabella then the margareta is leftish. If something redesign the bernadina and it is ripened then the bernadina redesign the margareta. If the bernadina teargas the valentin then the valentin teargas the bernadina. If something teargas the margareta then it teargas the valentin. If something redesign the valentin then the valentin is retarded. If something is leftish and it redesign the mirabella then it refreshen the margareta. If something refreshen the bernadina then it is retarded. If something teargas the bernadina then the bernadina teargas the margareta. The mirabella is not retarded.", "logic": "\nRefreshen(margareta, bernadina)\nRefreshen(valentin, margareta)\nRefreshen(mirabella, margareta)\nRefreshen(mirabella, bernadina)\nTeargas(mirabella, bernadina)\nLeftish(bernadina)\nLively(bernadina)\nRedesign(margareta, mirabella) -> Leftish(margareta)\nforall x (Redesign(x, bernadina) and Ripened(x) -> Redesign(bernadina, margareta))\nTeargas(bernadina, valentin) -> Teargas(valentin, bernadina)\nforall x (Teargas(x, margareta) -> Teargas(x, valentin))\nforall x (Redesign(x, valentin) -> Retarded(valentin))\nforall x (Leftish(x) and Redesign(x, mirabella) -> Refreshen(x, margareta))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, bernadina) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Teargas(x, bernadina) -> Teargas(bernadina, margareta))\n\nnot Retarded(mirabella)\n\nRefreshen(mirabella, bernadina) and forall x (Refreshen(x, bernadina) -> Retarded(x)) -> therefore Retarded(mirabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The ammamaria squint the nola. The mack squint the ammamaria. The fonzie squint the ammamaria. The fonzie squint the nola. The fonzie pressure the nola. The nola is alate. The nola is fishy. If the ammamaria demo the fonzie then the ammamaria is alate. If something demo the nola and it is starchy then the nola demo the ammamaria. If the nola pressure the mack then the mack pressure the nola. If something pressure the ammamaria then it pressure the mack. If something demo the mack then the mack is schmaltzy. If something is alate and it demo the fonzie then it squint the ammamaria. If something squint the nola then it is schmaltzy. If something pressure the nola then the nola pressure the ammamaria. The nola pressure the mack.", "logic": "\nSquint(ammamaria, nola)\nSquint(mack, ammamaria)\nSquint(fonzie, ammamaria)\nSquint(fonzie, nola)\nPressure(fonzie, nola)\nAlate(nola)\nFishy(nola)\nDemo(ammamaria, fonzie) -> Alate(ammamaria)\nforall x (Demo(x, nola) and Starchy(x) -> Demo(nola, ammamaria))\nPressure(nola, mack) -> Pressure(mack, nola)\nforall x (Pressure(x, ammamaria) -> Pressure(x, mack))\nforall x (Demo(x, mack) -> Schmaltzy(mack))\nforall x (Alate(x) and Demo(x, fonzie) -> Squint(x, ammamaria))\nforall x (Squint(x, nola) -> Schmaltzy(x))\nforall x (Pressure(x, nola) -> Pressure(nola, ammamaria))\n\nPressure(nola, mack)\n\nPressure(fonzie, nola) and forall x (Pressure(x, nola) -> Pressure(nola, ammamaria)) -> therefore Pressure(nola, ammamaria) Pressure(nola, ammamaria) and forall x (Pressure(x, ammamaria) -> Pressure(x, mack)) -> therefore Pressure(nola, mack)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The jacintha pursue the isador. The ceciley pursue the jacintha. The trina pursue the jacintha. The trina pursue the isador. The trina suspend the isador. The isador is peregrine. The isador is unmade. If the jacintha complicate the trina then the jacintha is peregrine. If something complicate the isador and it is unready then the isador complicate the jacintha. If the isador suspend the ceciley then the ceciley suspend the isador. If something suspend the jacintha then it suspend the ceciley. If something complicate the ceciley then the ceciley is erroneous. If something is peregrine and it complicate the trina then it pursue the jacintha. If something pursue the isador then it is erroneous. If something suspend the isador then the isador suspend the jacintha. The isador does not visit the ceciley.", "logic": "\nPursue(jacintha, isador)\nPursue(ceciley, jacintha)\nPursue(trina, jacintha)\nPursue(trina, isador)\nSuspend(trina, isador)\nPeregrine(isador)\nUnmade(isador)\nComplicate(jacintha, trina) -> Peregrine(jacintha)\nforall x (Complicate(x, isador) and Unready(x) -> Complicate(isador, jacintha))\nSuspend(isador, ceciley) -> Suspend(ceciley, isador)\nforall x (Suspend(x, jacintha) -> Suspend(x, ceciley))\nforall x (Complicate(x, ceciley) -> Erroneous(ceciley))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) and Complicate(x, trina) -> Pursue(x, jacintha))\nforall x (Pursue(x, isador) -> Erroneous(x))\nforall x (Suspend(x, isador) -> Suspend(isador, jacintha))\n\nnot Suspend(isador, ceciley)\n\nSuspend(trina, isador) and forall x (Suspend(x, isador) -> Suspend(isador, jacintha)) -> therefore Suspend(isador, jacintha) Suspend(isador, jacintha) and forall x (Suspend(x, jacintha) -> Suspend(x, ceciley)) -> therefore Suspend(isador, ceciley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The arly rubricate the karole. The flynn rubricate the arly. The ondrea rubricate the arly. The ondrea rubricate the karole. The ondrea bewray the karole. The karole is anorthitic. The karole is friendless. If the arly rubberise the ondrea then the arly is anorthitic. If something rubberise the karole and it is perceived then the karole rubberise the arly. If the karole bewray the flynn then the flynn bewray the karole. If something bewray the arly then it bewray the flynn. If something rubberise the flynn then the flynn is strep. If something is anorthitic and it rubberise the ondrea then it rubricate the arly. If something rubricate the karole then it is strep. If something bewray the karole then the karole bewray the arly. The flynn bewray the karole.", "logic": "\nRubricate(arly, karole)\nRubricate(flynn, arly)\nRubricate(ondrea, arly)\nRubricate(ondrea, karole)\nBewray(ondrea, karole)\nAnorthitic(karole)\nFriendless(karole)\nRubberise(arly, ondrea) -> Anorthitic(arly)\nforall x (Rubberise(x, karole) and Perceived(x) -> Rubberise(karole, arly))\nBewray(karole, flynn) -> Bewray(flynn, karole)\nforall x (Bewray(x, arly) -> Bewray(x, flynn))\nforall x (Rubberise(x, flynn) -> Strep(flynn))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) and Rubberise(x, ondrea) -> Rubricate(x, arly))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, karole) -> Strep(x))\nforall x (Bewray(x, karole) -> Bewray(karole, arly))\n\nBewray(flynn, karole)\n\nBewray(ondrea, karole) and forall x (Bewray(x, karole) -> Bewray(karole, arly)) -> therefore Bewray(karole, arly) Bewray(karole, arly) and forall x (Bewray(x, arly) -> Bewray(x, flynn)) -> therefore Bewray(karole, flynn) Bewray(karole, flynn) and Bewray(karole, flynn) -> Bewray(flynn, karole) -> therefore Bewray(flynn, karole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The osbert rebuild the wilmer. The linnie rebuild the osbert. The eden rebuild the osbert. The eden rebuild the wilmer. The eden fabricate the wilmer. The wilmer is precatory. The wilmer is paternal. If the osbert urge the eden then the osbert is precatory. If something urge the wilmer and it is allogeneic then the wilmer urge the osbert. If the wilmer fabricate the linnie then the linnie fabricate the wilmer. If something fabricate the osbert then it fabricate the linnie. If something urge the linnie then the linnie is elect. If something is precatory and it urge the eden then it rebuild the osbert. If something rebuild the wilmer then it is elect. If something fabricate the wilmer then the wilmer fabricate the osbert. The linnie does not visit the wilmer.", "logic": "\nRebuild(osbert, wilmer)\nRebuild(linnie, osbert)\nRebuild(eden, osbert)\nRebuild(eden, wilmer)\nFabricate(eden, wilmer)\nPrecatory(wilmer)\nPaternal(wilmer)\nUrge(osbert, eden) -> Precatory(osbert)\nforall x (Urge(x, wilmer) and Allogeneic(x) -> Urge(wilmer, osbert))\nFabricate(wilmer, linnie) -> Fabricate(linnie, wilmer)\nforall x (Fabricate(x, osbert) -> Fabricate(x, linnie))\nforall x (Urge(x, linnie) -> Elect(linnie))\nforall x (Precatory(x) and Urge(x, eden) -> Rebuild(x, osbert))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, wilmer) -> Elect(x))\nforall x (Fabricate(x, wilmer) -> Fabricate(wilmer, osbert))\n\nnot Fabricate(linnie, wilmer)\n\nFabricate(eden, wilmer) and forall x (Fabricate(x, wilmer) -> Fabricate(wilmer, osbert)) -> therefore Fabricate(wilmer, osbert) Fabricate(wilmer, osbert) and forall x (Fabricate(x, osbert) -> Fabricate(x, linnie)) -> therefore Fabricate(wilmer, linnie) Fabricate(wilmer, linnie) and Fabricate(wilmer, linnie) -> Fabricate(linnie, wilmer) -> therefore Fabricate(linnie, wilmer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The dru graduate the mallory. The margret graduate the dru. The corri graduate the dru. The corri graduate the mallory. The corri ensue the mallory. The mallory is medical. The mallory is impelled. If the dru surround the corri then the dru is medical. If something surround the mallory and it is reticular then the mallory surround the dru. If the mallory ensue the margret then the margret ensue the mallory. If something ensue the dru then it ensue the margret. If something surround the margret then the margret is probing. If something is medical and it surround the corri then it graduate the dru. If something graduate the mallory then it is probing. If something ensue the mallory then the mallory ensue the dru. The mallory does not see the dru.", "logic": "\nGraduate(dru, mallory)\nGraduate(margret, dru)\nGraduate(corri, dru)\nGraduate(corri, mallory)\nEnsue(corri, mallory)\nMedical(mallory)\nImpelled(mallory)\nSurround(dru, corri) -> Medical(dru)\nforall x (Surround(x, mallory) and Reticular(x) -> Surround(mallory, dru))\nEnsue(mallory, margret) -> Ensue(margret, mallory)\nforall x (Ensue(x, dru) -> Ensue(x, margret))\nforall x (Surround(x, margret) -> Probing(margret))\nforall x (Medical(x) and Surround(x, corri) -> Graduate(x, dru))\nforall x (Graduate(x, mallory) -> Probing(x))\nforall x (Ensue(x, mallory) -> Ensue(mallory, dru))\n\nnot Surround(mallory, dru)\n\nforall x (Surround(x, mallory) and Reticular(x) -> Surround(mallory, dru)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The britney victual the sherye. The hedvig victual the britney. The ignace victual the britney. The ignace victual the sherye. The ignace fulminate the sherye. The sherye is bronzy. The sherye is thrilled. If the britney impanel the ignace then the britney is bronzy. If something impanel the sherye and it is ecdemic then the sherye impanel the britney. If the sherye fulminate the hedvig then the hedvig fulminate the sherye. If something fulminate the britney then it fulminate the hedvig. If something impanel the hedvig then the hedvig is chartered. If something is bronzy and it impanel the ignace then it victual the britney. If something victual the sherye then it is chartered. If something fulminate the sherye then the sherye fulminate the britney. The britney victual the britney.", "logic": "\nVictual(britney, sherye)\nVictual(hedvig, britney)\nVictual(ignace, britney)\nVictual(ignace, sherye)\nFulminate(ignace, sherye)\nBronzy(sherye)\nThrilled(sherye)\nImpanel(britney, ignace) -> Bronzy(britney)\nforall x (Impanel(x, sherye) and Ecdemic(x) -> Impanel(sherye, britney))\nFulminate(sherye, hedvig) -> Fulminate(hedvig, sherye)\nforall x (Fulminate(x, britney) -> Fulminate(x, hedvig))\nforall x (Impanel(x, hedvig) -> Chartered(hedvig))\nforall x (Bronzy(x) and Impanel(x, ignace) -> Victual(x, britney))\nforall x (Victual(x, sherye) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Fulminate(x, sherye) -> Fulminate(sherye, britney))\n\nVictual(britney, britney)\n\nforall x (Bronzy(x) and Impanel(x, ignace) -> Victual(x, britney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The caterina shoehorn the cathlene. The chandal shoehorn the caterina. The heide shoehorn the caterina. The heide shoehorn the cathlene. The heide digitalise the cathlene. The cathlene is autogenic. The cathlene is untipped. If the caterina retell the heide then the caterina is autogenic. If something retell the cathlene and it is diffused then the cathlene retell the caterina. If the cathlene digitalise the chandal then the chandal digitalise the cathlene. If something digitalise the caterina then it digitalise the chandal. If something retell the chandal then the chandal is jagged. If something is autogenic and it retell the heide then it shoehorn the caterina. If something shoehorn the cathlene then it is jagged. If something digitalise the cathlene then the cathlene digitalise the caterina. The chandal is not jagged.", "logic": "\nShoehorn(caterina, cathlene)\nShoehorn(chandal, caterina)\nShoehorn(heide, caterina)\nShoehorn(heide, cathlene)\nDigitalise(heide, cathlene)\nAutogenic(cathlene)\nUntipped(cathlene)\nRetell(caterina, heide) -> Autogenic(caterina)\nforall x (Retell(x, cathlene) and Diffused(x) -> Retell(cathlene, caterina))\nDigitalise(cathlene, chandal) -> Digitalise(chandal, cathlene)\nforall x (Digitalise(x, caterina) -> Digitalise(x, chandal))\nforall x (Retell(x, chandal) -> Jagged(chandal))\nforall x (Autogenic(x) and Retell(x, heide) -> Shoehorn(x, caterina))\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, cathlene) -> Jagged(x))\nforall x (Digitalise(x, cathlene) -> Digitalise(cathlene, caterina))\n\nnot Jagged(chandal)\n\nforall x (Retell(x, chandal) -> Jagged(chandal)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The hailey slope the steffen. The ivy slope the hailey. The pierce slope the hailey. The pierce slope the steffen. The pierce relearn the steffen. The steffen is living. The steffen is bayesian. If the hailey invite the pierce then the hailey is living. If something invite the steffen and it is defoliate then the steffen invite the hailey. If the steffen relearn the ivy then the ivy relearn the steffen. If something relearn the hailey then it relearn the ivy. If something invite the ivy then the ivy is dismissive. If something is living and it invite the pierce then it slope the hailey. If something slope the steffen then it is dismissive. If something relearn the steffen then the steffen relearn the hailey. The hailey is living.", "logic": "\nSlope(hailey, steffen)\nSlope(ivy, hailey)\nSlope(pierce, hailey)\nSlope(pierce, steffen)\nRelearn(pierce, steffen)\nLiving(steffen)\nBayesian(steffen)\nInvite(hailey, pierce) -> Living(hailey)\nforall x (Invite(x, steffen) and Defoliate(x) -> Invite(steffen, hailey))\nRelearn(steffen, ivy) -> Relearn(ivy, steffen)\nforall x (Relearn(x, hailey) -> Relearn(x, ivy))\nforall x (Invite(x, ivy) -> Dismissive(ivy))\nforall x (Living(x) and Invite(x, pierce) -> Slope(x, hailey))\nforall x (Slope(x, steffen) -> Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Relearn(x, steffen) -> Relearn(steffen, hailey))\n\nLiving(hailey)\n\nInvite(hailey, pierce) -> Living(hailey) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The loralyn vamoose the elihu. The hester vamoose the loralyn. The nicole vamoose the loralyn. The nicole vamoose the elihu. The nicole genuflect the elihu. The elihu is encouraged. The elihu is bolivian. If the loralyn soar the nicole then the loralyn is encouraged. If something soar the elihu and it is stylized then the elihu soar the loralyn. If the elihu genuflect the hester then the hester genuflect the elihu. If something genuflect the loralyn then it genuflect the hester. If something soar the hester then the hester is mansard. If something is encouraged and it soar the nicole then it vamoose the loralyn. If something vamoose the elihu then it is mansard. If something genuflect the elihu then the elihu genuflect the loralyn. The loralyn does not eat the hester.", "logic": "\nVamoose(loralyn, elihu)\nVamoose(hester, loralyn)\nVamoose(nicole, loralyn)\nVamoose(nicole, elihu)\nGenuflect(nicole, elihu)\nEncouraged(elihu)\nBolivian(elihu)\nSoar(loralyn, nicole) -> Encouraged(loralyn)\nforall x (Soar(x, elihu) and Stylized(x) -> Soar(elihu, loralyn))\nGenuflect(elihu, hester) -> Genuflect(hester, elihu)\nforall x (Genuflect(x, loralyn) -> Genuflect(x, hester))\nforall x (Soar(x, hester) -> Mansard(hester))\nforall x (Encouraged(x) and Soar(x, nicole) -> Vamoose(x, loralyn))\nforall x (Vamoose(x, elihu) -> Mansard(x))\nforall x (Genuflect(x, elihu) -> Genuflect(elihu, loralyn))\n\nnot Vamoose(loralyn, hester)\n\nnot Vamoose(loralyn, hester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The winni benefit the giacinta. The prudence benefit the winni. The sussi benefit the winni. The sussi benefit the giacinta. The sussi shuck the giacinta. The giacinta is unstirred. The giacinta is extinct. If the winni gossip the sussi then the winni is unstirred. If something gossip the giacinta and it is mechanized then the giacinta gossip the winni. If the giacinta shuck the prudence then the prudence shuck the giacinta. If something shuck the winni then it shuck the prudence. If something gossip the prudence then the prudence is mystified. If something is unstirred and it gossip the sussi then it benefit the winni. If something benefit the giacinta then it is mystified. If something shuck the giacinta then the giacinta shuck the winni. The prudence is extinct.", "logic": "\nBenefit(winni, giacinta)\nBenefit(prudence, winni)\nBenefit(sussi, winni)\nBenefit(sussi, giacinta)\nShuck(sussi, giacinta)\nUnstirred(giacinta)\nExtinct(giacinta)\nGossip(winni, sussi) -> Unstirred(winni)\nforall x (Gossip(x, giacinta) and Mechanized(x) -> Gossip(giacinta, winni))\nShuck(giacinta, prudence) -> Shuck(prudence, giacinta)\nforall x (Shuck(x, winni) -> Shuck(x, prudence))\nforall x (Gossip(x, prudence) -> Mystified(prudence))\nforall x (Unstirred(x) and Gossip(x, sussi) -> Benefit(x, winni))\nforall x (Benefit(x, giacinta) -> Mystified(x))\nforall x (Shuck(x, giacinta) -> Shuck(giacinta, winni))\n\nExtinct(prudence)\n\nExtinct(prudence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The sadie beget the lucas. The gershom beget the sadie. The dionis beget the sadie. The dionis beget the lucas. The dionis reinforce the lucas. The lucas is entrancing. The lucas is muddy. If the sadie hood the dionis then the sadie is entrancing. If something hood the lucas and it is femoral then the lucas hood the sadie. If the lucas reinforce the gershom then the gershom reinforce the lucas. If something reinforce the sadie then it reinforce the gershom. If something hood the gershom then the gershom is araneidan. If something is entrancing and it hood the dionis then it beget the sadie. If something beget the lucas then it is araneidan. If something reinforce the lucas then the lucas reinforce the sadie. The sadie does not visit the sadie.", "logic": "\nBeget(sadie, lucas)\nBeget(gershom, sadie)\nBeget(dionis, sadie)\nBeget(dionis, lucas)\nReinforce(dionis, lucas)\nEntrancing(lucas)\nMuddy(lucas)\nHood(sadie, dionis) -> Entrancing(sadie)\nforall x (Hood(x, lucas) and Femoral(x) -> Hood(lucas, sadie))\nReinforce(lucas, gershom) -> Reinforce(gershom, lucas)\nforall x (Reinforce(x, sadie) -> Reinforce(x, gershom))\nforall x (Hood(x, gershom) -> Araneidan(gershom))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) and Hood(x, dionis) -> Beget(x, sadie))\nforall x (Beget(x, lucas) -> Araneidan(x))\nforall x (Reinforce(x, lucas) -> Reinforce(lucas, sadie))\n\nnot Reinforce(sadie, sadie)\n\nnot Reinforce(sadie, sadie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The becki spiel the rana. The colleen spiel the becki. The donna spiel the becki. The donna spiel the rana. The donna mapquest the rana. The rana is stellar. The rana is missing. If the becki evict the donna then the becki is stellar. If something evict the rana and it is nilotic then the rana evict the becki. If the rana mapquest the colleen then the colleen mapquest the rana. If something mapquest the becki then it mapquest the colleen. If something evict the colleen then the colleen is punctured. If something is stellar and it evict the donna then it spiel the becki. If something spiel the rana then it is punctured. If something mapquest the rana then the rana mapquest the becki. The colleen evict the becki.", "logic": "\nSpiel(becki, rana)\nSpiel(colleen, becki)\nSpiel(donna, becki)\nSpiel(donna, rana)\nMapquest(donna, rana)\nStellar(rana)\nMissing(rana)\nEvict(becki, donna) -> Stellar(becki)\nforall x (Evict(x, rana) and Nilotic(x) -> Evict(rana, becki))\nMapquest(rana, colleen) -> Mapquest(colleen, rana)\nforall x (Mapquest(x, becki) -> Mapquest(x, colleen))\nforall x (Evict(x, colleen) -> Punctured(colleen))\nforall x (Stellar(x) and Evict(x, donna) -> Spiel(x, becki))\nforall x (Spiel(x, rana) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Mapquest(x, rana) -> Mapquest(rana, becki))\n\nEvict(colleen, becki)\n\nEvict(colleen, becki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The shelby tally the lorry. The lorry devil the shelby. If someone tally the shelby then they do not chase the lorry. If someone devil the shelby then the shelby swig the lorry. If someone devil the lorry then the lorry is monotonous. If someone swig the lorry then they are vapid. All vapid people are not worldly. If someone swig the lorry and they are not vapid then the lorry is not prognostic. The lorry devil the shelby.", "logic": "\nTally(shelby, lorry)\nDevil(lorry, shelby)\nforall x (Tally(x, shelby) -> not Tally(x, lorry))\nforall x (Devil(x, shelby) -> Swig(shelby, lorry))\nforall x (Devil(x, lorry) -> Monotonous(lorry))\nforall x (Swig(x, lorry) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Vapid(x) -> not Worldly(x))\nforall x (Swig(x, lorry) and not Vapid(x) -> not Prognostic(lorry))\n\nDevil(lorry, shelby)\n\ntherefore Devil(lorry, shelby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The mariele rocket the della. The della butterfly the mariele. If someone rocket the mariele then they do not chase the della. If someone butterfly the mariele then the mariele kite the della. If someone butterfly the della then the della is autolytic. If someone kite the della then they are stovepiped. All stovepiped people are not mediocre. If someone kite the della and they are not stovepiped then the della is not smuggled. The mariele does not chase the della.", "logic": "\nRocket(mariele, della)\nButterfly(della, mariele)\nforall x (Rocket(x, mariele) -> not Rocket(x, della))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, mariele) -> Kite(mariele, della))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, della) -> Autolytic(della))\nforall x (Kite(x, della) -> Stovepiped(x))\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> not Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Kite(x, della) and not Stovepiped(x) -> not Smuggled(della))\n\nnot Rocket(mariele, della)\n\ntherefore Rocket(mariele, della)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The fyodor dehumidify the anthony. The anthony nickel the fyodor. If someone dehumidify the fyodor then they do not chase the anthony. If someone nickel the fyodor then the fyodor speck the anthony. If someone nickel the anthony then the anthony is heliac. If someone speck the anthony then they are indirect. All indirect people are not unweaned. If someone speck the anthony and they are not indirect then the anthony is not phalangeal. The fyodor speck the anthony.", "logic": "\nDehumidify(fyodor, anthony)\nNickel(anthony, fyodor)\nforall x (Dehumidify(x, fyodor) -> not Dehumidify(x, anthony))\nforall x (Nickel(x, fyodor) -> Speck(fyodor, anthony))\nforall x (Nickel(x, anthony) -> Heliac(anthony))\nforall x (Speck(x, anthony) -> Indirect(x))\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> not Unweaned(x))\nforall x (Speck(x, anthony) and not Indirect(x) -> not Phalangeal(anthony))\n\nSpeck(fyodor, anthony)\n\nNickel(anthony, fyodor) and forall x (Nickel(x, fyodor) -> Speck(fyodor, anthony)) -> therefore Speck(fyodor, anthony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The rutledge firebomb the winston. The winston boggle the rutledge. If someone firebomb the rutledge then they do not chase the winston. If someone boggle the rutledge then the rutledge forestall the winston. If someone boggle the winston then the winston is contrite. If someone forestall the winston then they are brummagem. All brummagem people are not impotent. If someone forestall the winston and they are not brummagem then the winston is not grabby. The rutledge does not eat the winston.", "logic": "\nFirebomb(rutledge, winston)\nBoggle(winston, rutledge)\nforall x (Firebomb(x, rutledge) -> not Firebomb(x, winston))\nforall x (Boggle(x, rutledge) -> Forestall(rutledge, winston))\nforall x (Boggle(x, winston) -> Contrite(winston))\nforall x (Forestall(x, winston) -> Brummagem(x))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> not Impotent(x))\nforall x (Forestall(x, winston) and not Brummagem(x) -> not Grabby(winston))\n\nnot Forestall(rutledge, winston)\n\nBoggle(winston, rutledge) and forall x (Boggle(x, rutledge) -> Forestall(rutledge, winston)) -> therefore Forestall(rutledge, winston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The adore emcee the nan. The nan soil the adore. If someone emcee the adore then they do not chase the nan. If someone soil the adore then the adore leach the nan. If someone soil the nan then the nan is overcast. If someone leach the nan then they are perinatal. All perinatal people are not sloughy. If someone leach the nan and they are not perinatal then the nan is not nihilistic. The adore is perinatal.", "logic": "\nEmcee(adore, nan)\nSoil(nan, adore)\nforall x (Emcee(x, adore) -> not Emcee(x, nan))\nforall x (Soil(x, adore) -> Leach(adore, nan))\nforall x (Soil(x, nan) -> Overcast(nan))\nforall x (Leach(x, nan) -> Perinatal(x))\nforall x (Perinatal(x) -> not Sloughy(x))\nforall x (Leach(x, nan) and not Perinatal(x) -> not Nihilistic(nan))\n\nPerinatal(adore)\n\nSoil(nan, adore) and forall x (Soil(x, adore) -> Leach(adore, nan)) -> therefore Leach(adore, nan) Leach(adore, nan) and forall x (Leach(x, nan) -> Perinatal(x)) -> therefore Perinatal(adore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The clemens deter the quigly. The quigly gazump the clemens. If someone deter the clemens then they do not chase the quigly. If someone gazump the clemens then the clemens coronate the quigly. If someone gazump the quigly then the quigly is upper. If someone coronate the quigly then they are ceruminous. All ceruminous people are not nebulose. If someone coronate the quigly and they are not ceruminous then the quigly is not noetic. The clemens is not ceruminous.", "logic": "\nDeter(clemens, quigly)\nGazump(quigly, clemens)\nforall x (Deter(x, clemens) -> not Deter(x, quigly))\nforall x (Gazump(x, clemens) -> Coronate(clemens, quigly))\nforall x (Gazump(x, quigly) -> Upper(quigly))\nforall x (Coronate(x, quigly) -> Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) -> not Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Coronate(x, quigly) and not Ceruminous(x) -> not Noetic(quigly))\n\nnot Ceruminous(clemens)\n\nGazump(quigly, clemens) and forall x (Gazump(x, clemens) -> Coronate(clemens, quigly)) -> therefore Coronate(clemens, quigly) Coronate(clemens, quigly) and forall x (Coronate(x, quigly) -> Ceruminous(x)) -> therefore Ceruminous(clemens)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The vladimir spatter the vittoria. The vittoria uphold the vladimir. If someone spatter the vladimir then they do not chase the vittoria. If someone uphold the vladimir then the vladimir overcast the vittoria. If someone uphold the vittoria then the vittoria is workable. If someone overcast the vittoria then they are fibreoptic. All fibreoptic people are not provincial. If someone overcast the vittoria and they are not fibreoptic then the vittoria is not rushlike. The vladimir is not provincial.", "logic": "\nSpatter(vladimir, vittoria)\nUphold(vittoria, vladimir)\nforall x (Spatter(x, vladimir) -> not Spatter(x, vittoria))\nforall x (Uphold(x, vladimir) -> Overcast(vladimir, vittoria))\nforall x (Uphold(x, vittoria) -> Workable(vittoria))\nforall x (Overcast(x, vittoria) -> Fibreoptic(x))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> not Provincial(x))\nforall x (Overcast(x, vittoria) and not Fibreoptic(x) -> not Rushlike(vittoria))\n\nnot Provincial(vladimir)\n\nUphold(vittoria, vladimir) and forall x (Uphold(x, vladimir) -> Overcast(vladimir, vittoria)) -> therefore Overcast(vladimir, vittoria) Overcast(vladimir, vittoria) and forall x (Overcast(x, vittoria) -> Fibreoptic(x)) -> therefore Fibreoptic(vladimir) Fibreoptic(vladimir) and forall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> not Provincial(x)) -> therefore not Provincial(vladimir)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The sloane adhere the peirce. The peirce braille the sloane. If someone adhere the sloane then they do not chase the peirce. If someone braille the sloane then the sloane moon the peirce. If someone braille the peirce then the peirce is swollen. If someone moon the peirce then they are unbowed. All unbowed people are not deciding. If someone moon the peirce and they are not unbowed then the peirce is not patrician. The sloane is deciding.", "logic": "\nAdhere(sloane, peirce)\nBraille(peirce, sloane)\nforall x (Adhere(x, sloane) -> not Adhere(x, peirce))\nforall x (Braille(x, sloane) -> Moon(sloane, peirce))\nforall x (Braille(x, peirce) -> Swollen(peirce))\nforall x (Moon(x, peirce) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Unbowed(x) -> not Deciding(x))\nforall x (Moon(x, peirce) and not Unbowed(x) -> not Patrician(peirce))\n\nDeciding(sloane)\n\nBraille(peirce, sloane) and forall x (Braille(x, sloane) -> Moon(sloane, peirce)) -> therefore Moon(sloane, peirce) Moon(sloane, peirce) and forall x (Moon(x, peirce) -> Unbowed(x)) -> therefore Unbowed(sloane) Unbowed(sloane) and forall x (Unbowed(x) -> not Deciding(x)) -> therefore not Deciding(sloane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The morena overcrowd the barbra. The barbra egress the morena. If someone overcrowd the morena then they do not chase the barbra. If someone egress the morena then the morena stigmatise the barbra. If someone egress the barbra then the barbra is sliced. If someone stigmatise the barbra then they are beta. All beta people are not separate. If someone stigmatise the barbra and they are not beta then the barbra is not kafkaesque. The barbra is not sliced.", "logic": "\nOvercrowd(morena, barbra)\nEgress(barbra, morena)\nforall x (Overcrowd(x, morena) -> not Overcrowd(x, barbra))\nforall x (Egress(x, morena) -> Stigmatise(morena, barbra))\nforall x (Egress(x, barbra) -> Sliced(barbra))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, barbra) -> Beta(x))\nforall x (Beta(x) -> not Separate(x))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, barbra) and not Beta(x) -> not Kafkaesque(barbra))\n\nnot Sliced(barbra)\n\nforall x (Egress(x, barbra) -> Sliced(barbra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The aurelie morph the coreen. The coreen criticize the aurelie. If someone morph the aurelie then they do not chase the coreen. If someone criticize the aurelie then the aurelie spurt the coreen. If someone criticize the coreen then the coreen is starring. If someone spurt the coreen then they are raising. All raising people are not lumpy. If someone spurt the coreen and they are not raising then the coreen is not luckless. The coreen is raising.", "logic": "\nMorph(aurelie, coreen)\nCriticize(coreen, aurelie)\nforall x (Morph(x, aurelie) -> not Morph(x, coreen))\nforall x (Criticize(x, aurelie) -> Spurt(aurelie, coreen))\nforall x (Criticize(x, coreen) -> Starring(coreen))\nforall x (Spurt(x, coreen) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Raising(x) -> not Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Spurt(x, coreen) and not Raising(x) -> not Luckless(coreen))\n\nRaising(coreen)\n\nforall x (Spurt(x, coreen) -> Raising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The hugh trounce the kellie. The kellie lounge the hugh. If someone trounce the hugh then they do not chase the kellie. If someone lounge the hugh then the hugh indispose the kellie. If someone lounge the kellie then the kellie is convoluted. If someone indispose the kellie then they are accretive. All accretive people are not fledgeling. If someone indispose the kellie and they are not accretive then the kellie is not coronary. The kellie is not young.", "logic": "\nTrounce(hugh, kellie)\nLounge(kellie, hugh)\nforall x (Trounce(x, hugh) -> not Trounce(x, kellie))\nforall x (Lounge(x, hugh) -> Indispose(hugh, kellie))\nforall x (Lounge(x, kellie) -> Convoluted(kellie))\nforall x (Indispose(x, kellie) -> Accretive(x))\nforall x (Accretive(x) -> not Fledgeling(x))\nforall x (Indispose(x, kellie) and not Accretive(x) -> not Coronary(kellie))\n\nnot Young(kellie)\n\nnot Young(kellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The tiffany formicate the cari. The cari schuss the tiffany. If someone formicate the tiffany then they do not chase the cari. If someone schuss the tiffany then the tiffany affright the cari. If someone schuss the cari then the cari is parvenue. If someone affright the cari then they are maculate. All maculate people are not psychical. If someone affright the cari and they are not maculate then the cari is not episodic. The tiffany is episodic.", "logic": "\nFormicate(tiffany, cari)\nSchuss(cari, tiffany)\nforall x (Formicate(x, tiffany) -> not Formicate(x, cari))\nforall x (Schuss(x, tiffany) -> Affright(tiffany, cari))\nforall x (Schuss(x, cari) -> Parvenue(cari))\nforall x (Affright(x, cari) -> Maculate(x))\nforall x (Maculate(x) -> not Psychical(x))\nforall x (Affright(x, cari) and not Maculate(x) -> not Episodic(cari))\n\nEpisodic(tiffany)\n\nEpisodic(tiffany) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The curtis eliminate the gwyn. The gwyn inunct the curtis. If someone eliminate the curtis then they do not chase the gwyn. If someone inunct the curtis then the curtis caricature the gwyn. If someone inunct the gwyn then the gwyn is triumphal. If someone caricature the gwyn then they are crescent. All crescent people are not speckless. If someone caricature the gwyn and they are not crescent then the gwyn is not ambitious. The curtis is not young.", "logic": "\nEliminate(curtis, gwyn)\nInunct(gwyn, curtis)\nforall x (Eliminate(x, curtis) -> not Eliminate(x, gwyn))\nforall x (Inunct(x, curtis) -> Caricature(curtis, gwyn))\nforall x (Inunct(x, gwyn) -> Triumphal(gwyn))\nforall x (Caricature(x, gwyn) -> Crescent(x))\nforall x (Crescent(x) -> not Speckless(x))\nforall x (Caricature(x, gwyn) and not Crescent(x) -> not Ambitious(gwyn))\n\nnot Young(curtis)\n\nnot Young(curtis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The miquela release the clemmy. The clemmy direct the miquela. If someone release the miquela then they do not chase the clemmy. If someone direct the miquela then the miquela embroider the clemmy. If someone direct the clemmy then the clemmy is compressed. If someone embroider the clemmy then they are chemic. All chemic people are not mitigative. If someone embroider the clemmy and they are not chemic then the clemmy is not otherwise. The miquela direct the clemmy.", "logic": "\nRelease(miquela, clemmy)\nDirect(clemmy, miquela)\nforall x (Release(x, miquela) -> not Release(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Direct(x, miquela) -> Embroider(miquela, clemmy))\nforall x (Direct(x, clemmy) -> Compressed(clemmy))\nforall x (Embroider(x, clemmy) -> Chemic(x))\nforall x (Chemic(x) -> not Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Embroider(x, clemmy) and not Chemic(x) -> not Otherwise(clemmy))\n\nDirect(miquela, clemmy)\n\nDirect(miquela, clemmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The berry bleed the kimmy. The kimmy earth the berry. If someone bleed the berry then they do not chase the kimmy. If someone earth the berry then the berry slalom the kimmy. If someone earth the kimmy then the kimmy is bladdery. If someone slalom the kimmy then they are hebdomadal. All hebdomadal people are not spoiled. If someone slalom the kimmy and they are not hebdomadal then the kimmy is not mucous. The kimmy does not eat the berry.", "logic": "\nBleed(berry, kimmy)\nEarth(kimmy, berry)\nforall x (Bleed(x, berry) -> not Bleed(x, kimmy))\nforall x (Earth(x, berry) -> Slalom(berry, kimmy))\nforall x (Earth(x, kimmy) -> Bladdery(kimmy))\nforall x (Slalom(x, kimmy) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> not Spoiled(x))\nforall x (Slalom(x, kimmy) and not Hebdomadal(x) -> not Mucous(kimmy))\n\nnot Slalom(kimmy, berry)\n\nnot Slalom(kimmy, berry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The wolfram puree the hannah. The hannah unscrew the wolfram. If someone puree the wolfram then they do not chase the hannah. If someone unscrew the wolfram then the wolfram quail the hannah. If someone unscrew the hannah then the hannah is rawboned. If someone quail the hannah then they are rhenish. All rhenish people are not nipponese. If someone quail the hannah and they are not rhenish then the hannah is not sharpened. The wolfram puree the wolfram.", "logic": "\nPuree(wolfram, hannah)\nUnscrew(hannah, wolfram)\nforall x (Puree(x, wolfram) -> not Puree(x, hannah))\nforall x (Unscrew(x, wolfram) -> Quail(wolfram, hannah))\nforall x (Unscrew(x, hannah) -> Rawboned(hannah))\nforall x (Quail(x, hannah) -> Rhenish(x))\nforall x (Rhenish(x) -> not Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Quail(x, hannah) and not Rhenish(x) -> not Sharpened(hannah))\n\nPuree(wolfram, wolfram)\n\nPuree(wolfram, wolfram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "Antoni is mensal. Fianna is civilian. Tresa is incendiary. Nathalie is runic. All civilian, incendiary people are quenchless. If Fianna is mensal and Fianna is not runic then Fianna is not bungaloid. If someone is civilian then they are incendiary. If someone is runic then they are civilian. All civilian people are fuzzy. If someone is civilian then they are not bungaloid. Nathalie is runic.", "logic": "\nMensal(antoni)\nCivilian(fianna)\nIncendiary(tresa)\nRunic(nathalie)\nforall x (Civilian(x) and Incendiary(x) -> Quenchless(x))\nMensal(fianna) and not Runic(fianna) -> not Bungaloid(fianna)\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Incendiary(x))\nforall x (Runic(x) -> Civilian(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Fuzzy(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> not Bungaloid(x))\n\nRunic(nathalie)\n\ntherefore Runic(nathalie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Way is monolithic. Bengt is reclusive. Paulie is arbitrable. Galina is menacing. All reclusive, arbitrable people are atypical. If Bengt is monolithic and Bengt is not menacing then Bengt is not sacculate. If someone is reclusive then they are arbitrable. If someone is menacing then they are reclusive. All reclusive people are scheming. If someone is reclusive then they are not sacculate. Paulie is not arbitrable.", "logic": "\nMonolithic(way)\nReclusive(bengt)\nArbitrable(paulie)\nMenacing(galina)\nforall x (Reclusive(x) and Arbitrable(x) -> Atypical(x))\nMonolithic(bengt) and not Menacing(bengt) -> not Sacculate(bengt)\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Menacing(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Scheming(x))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> not Sacculate(x))\n\nnot Arbitrable(paulie)\n\ntherefore Arbitrable(paulie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Flemming is volumetric. Ada is neurotoxic. Robenia is shriveled. Rhiamon is christly. All neurotoxic, shriveled people are purifying. If Ada is volumetric and Ada is not christly then Ada is not placatory. If someone is neurotoxic then they are shriveled. If someone is christly then they are neurotoxic. All neurotoxic people are trilled. If someone is neurotoxic then they are not placatory. Rhiamon is neurotoxic.", "logic": "\nVolumetric(flemming)\nNeurotoxic(ada)\nShriveled(robenia)\nChristly(rhiamon)\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) and Shriveled(x) -> Purifying(x))\nVolumetric(ada) and not Christly(ada) -> not Placatory(ada)\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> Shriveled(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) -> Neurotoxic(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> Trilled(x))\nforall x (Neurotoxic(x) -> not Placatory(x))\n\nNeurotoxic(rhiamon)\n\nChristly(rhiamon) and forall x (Christly(x) -> Neurotoxic(x)) -> therefore Neurotoxic(rhiamon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Thaddeus is stertorous. Dix is antitumour. Scarface is judicial. Waly is volatile. All antitumour, judicial people are petrous. If Dix is stertorous and Dix is not volatile then Dix is not holophytic. If someone is antitumour then they are judicial. If someone is volatile then they are antitumour. All antitumour people are saxicoline. If someone is antitumour then they are not holophytic. Waly is not antitumour.", "logic": "\nStertorous(thaddeus)\nAntitumour(dix)\nJudicial(scarface)\nVolatile(waly)\nforall x (Antitumour(x) and Judicial(x) -> Petrous(x))\nStertorous(dix) and not Volatile(dix) -> not Holophytic(dix)\nforall x (Antitumour(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Volatile(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) -> not Holophytic(x))\n\nnot Antitumour(waly)\n\nVolatile(waly) and forall x (Volatile(x) -> Antitumour(x)) -> therefore Antitumour(waly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Ailina is binuclear. Lindie is provencal. Hamlen is sickly. Forest is tamed. All provencal, sickly people are thwartwise. If Lindie is binuclear and Lindie is not tamed then Lindie is not innumerate. If someone is provencal then they are sickly. If someone is tamed then they are provencal. All provencal people are pedestrian. If someone is provencal then they are not innumerate. Forest is sickly.", "logic": "\nBinuclear(ailina)\nProvencal(lindie)\nSickly(hamlen)\nTamed(forest)\nforall x (Provencal(x) and Sickly(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nBinuclear(lindie) and not Tamed(lindie) -> not Innumerate(lindie)\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> Sickly(x))\nforall x (Tamed(x) -> Provencal(x))\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> not Innumerate(x))\n\nSickly(forest)\n\nTamed(forest) and forall x (Tamed(x) -> Provencal(x)) -> therefore Provencal(forest) Provencal(forest) and forall x (Provencal(x) -> Sickly(x)) -> therefore Sickly(forest)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Dulciana is soulful. Kerrie is vestigial. Jami is viselike. Victoria is boney. All vestigial, viselike people are smashed. If Kerrie is soulful and Kerrie is not boney then Kerrie is not polyatomic. If someone is vestigial then they are viselike. If someone is boney then they are vestigial. All vestigial people are cheliceral. If someone is vestigial then they are not polyatomic. Kerrie is not smashed.", "logic": "\nSoulful(dulciana)\nVestigial(kerrie)\nViselike(jami)\nBoney(victoria)\nforall x (Vestigial(x) and Viselike(x) -> Smashed(x))\nSoulful(kerrie) and not Boney(kerrie) -> not Polyatomic(kerrie)\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> Viselike(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> Cheliceral(x))\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> not Polyatomic(x))\n\nnot Smashed(kerrie)\n\nVestigial(kerrie) and forall x (Vestigial(x) -> Viselike(x)) -> therefore Viselike(kerrie) Vestigial(kerrie) and Viselike(kerrie) and forall x (Vestigial(x) and Viselike(x) -> Smashed(x)) -> therefore Smashed(kerrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Ariadne is stitched. Eliot is mucous. Pammie is voluptuary. Ignace is befuddled. All mucous, voluptuary people are calculable. If Eliot is stitched and Eliot is not befuddled then Eliot is not taloned. If someone is mucous then they are voluptuary. If someone is befuddled then they are mucous. All mucous people are mesial. If someone is mucous then they are not taloned. Ignace is calculable.", "logic": "\nStitched(ariadne)\nMucous(eliot)\nVoluptuary(pammie)\nBefuddled(ignace)\nforall x (Mucous(x) and Voluptuary(x) -> Calculable(x))\nStitched(eliot) and not Befuddled(eliot) -> not Taloned(eliot)\nforall x (Mucous(x) -> Voluptuary(x))\nforall x (Befuddled(x) -> Mucous(x))\nforall x (Mucous(x) -> Mesial(x))\nforall x (Mucous(x) -> not Taloned(x))\n\nCalculable(ignace)\n\nBefuddled(ignace) and forall x (Befuddled(x) -> Mucous(x)) -> therefore Mucous(ignace) Befuddled(ignace) and forall x (Befuddled(x) -> Mucous(x)) -> therefore Mucous(ignace) Mucous(ignace) and forall x (Mucous(x) -> Voluptuary(x)) -> therefore Voluptuary(ignace) Mucous(ignace) and Voluptuary(ignace) and forall x (Mucous(x) and Voluptuary(x) -> Calculable(x)) -> therefore Calculable(ignace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Marabel is microsomal. Mildrid is christlike. Sylvia is cardiac. Ardath is gauzy. All christlike, cardiac people are racking. If Mildrid is microsomal and Mildrid is not gauzy then Mildrid is not niffy. If someone is christlike then they are cardiac. If someone is gauzy then they are christlike. All christlike people are botulinal. If someone is christlike then they are not niffy. Ardath is not racking.", "logic": "\nMicrosomal(marabel)\nChristlike(mildrid)\nCardiac(sylvia)\nGauzy(ardath)\nforall x (Christlike(x) and Cardiac(x) -> Racking(x))\nMicrosomal(mildrid) and not Gauzy(mildrid) -> not Niffy(mildrid)\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Christlike(x))\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> not Niffy(x))\n\nnot Racking(ardath)\n\nGauzy(ardath) and forall x (Gauzy(x) -> Christlike(x)) -> therefore Christlike(ardath) Gauzy(ardath) and forall x (Gauzy(x) -> Christlike(x)) -> therefore Christlike(ardath) Christlike(ardath) and forall x (Christlike(x) -> Cardiac(x)) -> therefore Cardiac(ardath) Christlike(ardath) and Cardiac(ardath) and forall x (Christlike(x) and Cardiac(x) -> Racking(x)) -> therefore Racking(ardath)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Thomasine is sunlit. Don is stealthy. Ettie is swingy. Piggy is apteral. All stealthy, swingy people are ultimo. If Don is sunlit and Don is not apteral then Don is not deflated. If someone is stealthy then they are swingy. If someone is apteral then they are stealthy. All stealthy people are midwestern. If someone is stealthy then they are not deflated. Ettie is not stealthy.", "logic": "\nSunlit(thomasine)\nStealthy(don)\nSwingy(ettie)\nApteral(piggy)\nforall x (Stealthy(x) and Swingy(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nSunlit(don) and not Apteral(don) -> not Deflated(don)\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Swingy(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) -> Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> not Deflated(x))\n\nnot Stealthy(ettie)\n\nforall x (Apteral(x) -> Stealthy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Terry is ossiculate. Hayes is corned. Susana is phylliform. Arvie is organized. All corned, phylliform people are despiteful. If Hayes is ossiculate and Hayes is not organized then Hayes is not trophic. If someone is corned then they are phylliform. If someone is organized then they are corned. All corned people are acyclic. If someone is corned then they are not trophic. Susana is despiteful.", "logic": "\nOssiculate(terry)\nCorned(hayes)\nPhylliform(susana)\nOrganized(arvie)\nforall x (Corned(x) and Phylliform(x) -> Despiteful(x))\nOssiculate(hayes) and not Organized(hayes) -> not Trophic(hayes)\nforall x (Corned(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Organized(x) -> Corned(x))\nforall x (Corned(x) -> Acyclic(x))\nforall x (Corned(x) -> not Trophic(x))\n\nDespiteful(susana)\n\nforall x (Corned(x) and Phylliform(x) -> Despiteful(x)) <- forall x (Organized(x) -> Corned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Paula is frowzy. Hewet is arrogant. Kaila is befuddled. Dori is idolatrous. All arrogant, befuddled people are catamenial. If Hewet is frowzy and Hewet is not idolatrous then Hewet is not offending. If someone is arrogant then they are befuddled. If someone is idolatrous then they are arrogant. All arrogant people are adactylous. If someone is arrogant then they are not offending. Paula is not arrogant.", "logic": "\nFrowzy(paula)\nArrogant(hewet)\nBefuddled(kaila)\nIdolatrous(dori)\nforall x (Arrogant(x) and Befuddled(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nFrowzy(hewet) and not Idolatrous(hewet) -> not Offending(hewet)\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Befuddled(x))\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) -> Arrogant(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> not Offending(x))\n\nnot Arrogant(paula)\n\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) -> Arrogant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Hillary is infrasonic. Cyrus is perianal. Brigid is brash. Valera is asserting. All perianal, brash people are applicable. If Cyrus is infrasonic and Cyrus is not asserting then Cyrus is not lipotropic. If someone is perianal then they are brash. If someone is asserting then they are perianal. All perianal people are unbitter. If someone is perianal then they are not lipotropic. Hillary is unbitter.", "logic": "\nInfrasonic(hillary)\nPerianal(cyrus)\nBrash(brigid)\nAsserting(valera)\nforall x (Perianal(x) and Brash(x) -> Applicable(x))\nInfrasonic(cyrus) and not Asserting(cyrus) -> not Lipotropic(cyrus)\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Asserting(x) -> Perianal(x))\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> Unbitter(x))\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> not Lipotropic(x))\n\nUnbitter(hillary)\n\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> Unbitter(x)) <- forall x (Asserting(x) -> Perianal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Sorcha is genotypic. Walden is levitical. Daloris is useful. Leanna is plus. All levitical, useful people are fiery. If Walden is genotypic and Walden is not plus then Walden is not harmonic. If someone is levitical then they are useful. If someone is plus then they are levitical. All levitical people are dishonored. If someone is levitical then they are not harmonic. Daloris is not plus.", "logic": "\nGenotypic(sorcha)\nLevitical(walden)\nUseful(daloris)\nPlus(leanna)\nforall x (Levitical(x) and Useful(x) -> Fiery(x))\nGenotypic(walden) and not Plus(walden) -> not Harmonic(walden)\nforall x (Levitical(x) -> Useful(x))\nforall x (Plus(x) -> Levitical(x))\nforall x (Levitical(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Levitical(x) -> not Harmonic(x))\n\nnot Plus(daloris)\n\nnot Plus(daloris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Megan is fusty. Matthias is vigilant. Liane is backhand. Linell is cherubic. All vigilant, backhand people are finespun. If Matthias is fusty and Matthias is not cherubic then Matthias is not eviscerate. If someone is vigilant then they are backhand. If someone is cherubic then they are vigilant. All vigilant people are confusable. If someone is vigilant then they are not eviscerate. Megan is cherubic.", "logic": "\nFusty(megan)\nVigilant(matthias)\nBackhand(liane)\nCherubic(linell)\nforall x (Vigilant(x) and Backhand(x) -> Finespun(x))\nFusty(matthias) and not Cherubic(matthias) -> not Eviscerate(matthias)\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Backhand(x))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Confusable(x))\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> not Eviscerate(x))\n\nCherubic(megan)\n\nCherubic(megan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Verina is lxii. Gill is extendible. Bathsheba is settled. Burton is changeful. All extendible, settled people are bermudan. If Gill is lxii and Gill is not changeful then Gill is not cumuliform. If someone is extendible then they are settled. If someone is changeful then they are extendible. All extendible people are alated. If someone is extendible then they are not cumuliform. Verina is not cumuliform.", "logic": "\nLxii(verina)\nExtendible(gill)\nSettled(bathsheba)\nChangeful(burton)\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Settled(x) -> Bermudan(x))\nLxii(gill) and not Changeful(gill) -> not Cumuliform(gill)\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Settled(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> not Cumuliform(x))\n\nnot Cumuliform(verina)\n\nnot Cumuliform(verina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Judy is methylated. Ximenes is unexcused. Lishe is successful. Hasty is brambly. All unexcused, successful people are expositive. If Ximenes is methylated and Ximenes is not brambly then Ximenes is not porous. If someone is unexcused then they are successful. If someone is brambly then they are unexcused. All unexcused people are cabalistic. If someone is unexcused then they are not porous. Lishe is porous.", "logic": "\nMethylated(judy)\nUnexcused(ximenes)\nSuccessful(lishe)\nBrambly(hasty)\nforall x (Unexcused(x) and Successful(x) -> Expositive(x))\nMethylated(ximenes) and not Brambly(ximenes) -> not Porous(ximenes)\nforall x (Unexcused(x) -> Successful(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Unexcused(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Unexcused(x) -> not Porous(x))\n\nPorous(lishe)\n\nPorous(lishe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "The kala brief the levon. The kala brief the candy. The kala paganise the candy. The kala is chimeric. The kala does not visit the levon. The kala dissever the candy. The levon brief the kala. The levon paganise the kala. The levon does not eat the candy. The levon is aberrant. The levon dissever the kala. The candy brief the levon. The candy paganise the kala. The candy paganise the levon. The candy dissever the levon. If something is cedarn then it does not eat the kala. If something brief the levon and the levon paganise the kala then it paganise the candy. If something dissever the candy and the candy brief the levon then the candy does not visit the kala. If the levon brief the candy then the levon is abomasal. If the candy does not visit the kala then the candy is not aberrant. If something brief the candy and the candy is not aberrant then it is uncoupled. The candy brief the levon.", "logic": "\nBrief(kala, levon)\nBrief(kala, candy)\nPaganise(kala, candy)\nChimeric(kala)\nnot Dissever(kala, levon)\nDissever(kala, candy)\nBrief(levon, kala)\nPaganise(levon, kala)\nnot Paganise(levon, candy)\nAberrant(levon)\nDissever(levon, kala)\nBrief(candy, levon)\nPaganise(candy, kala)\nPaganise(candy, levon)\nDissever(candy, levon)\nforall x (Cedarn(x) -> not Paganise(x, kala))\nforall x (Brief(x, levon) and Paganise(levon, kala) -> Paganise(x, candy))\nforall x (Dissever(x, candy) and Brief(candy, levon) -> not Dissever(candy, kala))\nBrief(levon, candy) -> Abomasal(levon)\nnot Dissever(candy, kala) -> not Aberrant(candy)\nforall x (Brief(x, candy) and not Aberrant(candy) -> Uncoupled(x))\n\nBrief(candy, levon)\n\ntherefore Brief(candy, levon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The rosalynd refute the suzi. The rosalynd refute the cari. The rosalynd remake the cari. The rosalynd is unaffixed. The rosalynd does not visit the suzi. The rosalynd blinker the cari. The suzi refute the rosalynd. The suzi remake the rosalynd. The suzi does not eat the cari. The suzi is allopathic. The suzi blinker the rosalynd. The cari refute the suzi. The cari remake the rosalynd. The cari remake the suzi. The cari blinker the suzi. If something is porose then it does not eat the rosalynd. If something refute the suzi and the suzi remake the rosalynd then it remake the cari. If something blinker the cari and the cari refute the suzi then the cari does not visit the rosalynd. If the suzi refute the cari then the suzi is sabahan. If the cari does not visit the rosalynd then the cari is not allopathic. If something refute the cari and the cari is not allopathic then it is dastard. The rosalynd does not visit the cari.", "logic": "\nRefute(rosalynd, suzi)\nRefute(rosalynd, cari)\nRemake(rosalynd, cari)\nUnaffixed(rosalynd)\nnot Blinker(rosalynd, suzi)\nBlinker(rosalynd, cari)\nRefute(suzi, rosalynd)\nRemake(suzi, rosalynd)\nnot Remake(suzi, cari)\nAllopathic(suzi)\nBlinker(suzi, rosalynd)\nRefute(cari, suzi)\nRemake(cari, rosalynd)\nRemake(cari, suzi)\nBlinker(cari, suzi)\nforall x (Porose(x) -> not Remake(x, rosalynd))\nforall x (Refute(x, suzi) and Remake(suzi, rosalynd) -> Remake(x, cari))\nforall x (Blinker(x, cari) and Refute(cari, suzi) -> not Blinker(cari, rosalynd))\nRefute(suzi, cari) -> Sabahan(suzi)\nnot Blinker(cari, rosalynd) -> not Allopathic(cari)\nforall x (Refute(x, cari) and not Allopathic(cari) -> Dastard(x))\n\nnot Blinker(rosalynd, cari)\n\ntherefore Blinker(rosalynd, cari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The vivianne snowshoe the koralle. The vivianne snowshoe the tate. The vivianne chorus the tate. The vivianne is polemical. The vivianne does not visit the koralle. The vivianne sense the tate. The koralle snowshoe the vivianne. The koralle chorus the vivianne. The koralle does not eat the tate. The koralle is frivolous. The koralle sense the vivianne. The tate snowshoe the koralle. The tate chorus the vivianne. The tate chorus the koralle. The tate sense the koralle. If something is tuxedoed then it does not eat the vivianne. If something snowshoe the koralle and the koralle chorus the vivianne then it chorus the tate. If something sense the tate and the tate snowshoe the koralle then the tate does not visit the vivianne. If the koralle snowshoe the tate then the koralle is spanish. If the tate does not visit the vivianne then the tate is not frivolous. If something snowshoe the tate and the tate is not frivolous then it is synoptic. The tate does not visit the vivianne.", "logic": "\nSnowshoe(vivianne, koralle)\nSnowshoe(vivianne, tate)\nChorus(vivianne, tate)\nPolemical(vivianne)\nnot Sense(vivianne, koralle)\nSense(vivianne, tate)\nSnowshoe(koralle, vivianne)\nChorus(koralle, vivianne)\nnot Chorus(koralle, tate)\nFrivolous(koralle)\nSense(koralle, vivianne)\nSnowshoe(tate, koralle)\nChorus(tate, vivianne)\nChorus(tate, koralle)\nSense(tate, koralle)\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> not Chorus(x, vivianne))\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, koralle) and Chorus(koralle, vivianne) -> Chorus(x, tate))\nforall x (Sense(x, tate) and Snowshoe(tate, koralle) -> not Sense(tate, vivianne))\nSnowshoe(koralle, tate) -> Spanish(koralle)\nnot Sense(tate, vivianne) -> not Frivolous(tate)\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, tate) and not Frivolous(tate) -> Synoptic(x))\n\nnot Sense(tate, vivianne)\n\nSense(vivianne, tate) and Snowshoe(tate, koralle) and forall x (Sense(x, tate) and Snowshoe(tate, koralle) -> not Sense(tate, vivianne)) -> therefore not Sense(tate, vivianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The harwell gasify the gladi. The harwell gasify the lesli. The harwell cruise the lesli. The harwell is meaning. The harwell does not visit the gladi. The harwell sensitise the lesli. The gladi gasify the harwell. The gladi cruise the harwell. The gladi does not eat the lesli. The gladi is vague. The gladi sensitise the harwell. The lesli gasify the gladi. The lesli cruise the harwell. The lesli cruise the gladi. The lesli sensitise the gladi. If something is baleful then it does not eat the harwell. If something gasify the gladi and the gladi cruise the harwell then it cruise the lesli. If something sensitise the lesli and the lesli gasify the gladi then the lesli does not visit the harwell. If the gladi gasify the lesli then the gladi is ungoverned. If the lesli does not visit the harwell then the lesli is not vague. If something gasify the lesli and the lesli is not vague then it is lexical. The lesli sensitise the harwell.", "logic": "\nGasify(harwell, gladi)\nGasify(harwell, lesli)\nCruise(harwell, lesli)\nMeaning(harwell)\nnot Sensitise(harwell, gladi)\nSensitise(harwell, lesli)\nGasify(gladi, harwell)\nCruise(gladi, harwell)\nnot Cruise(gladi, lesli)\nVague(gladi)\nSensitise(gladi, harwell)\nGasify(lesli, gladi)\nCruise(lesli, harwell)\nCruise(lesli, gladi)\nSensitise(lesli, gladi)\nforall x (Baleful(x) -> not Cruise(x, harwell))\nforall x (Gasify(x, gladi) and Cruise(gladi, harwell) -> Cruise(x, lesli))\nforall x (Sensitise(x, lesli) and Gasify(lesli, gladi) -> not Sensitise(lesli, harwell))\nGasify(gladi, lesli) -> Ungoverned(gladi)\nnot Sensitise(lesli, harwell) -> not Vague(lesli)\nforall x (Gasify(x, lesli) and not Vague(lesli) -> Lexical(x))\n\nSensitise(lesli, harwell)\n\nSensitise(harwell, lesli) and Gasify(lesli, gladi) and forall x (Sensitise(x, lesli) and Gasify(lesli, gladi) -> not Sensitise(lesli, harwell)) -> therefore not Sensitise(lesli, harwell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The cally incase the jilly. The cally incase the inga. The cally tide the inga. The cally is asymptotic. The cally does not visit the jilly. The cally canulate the inga. The jilly incase the cally. The jilly tide the cally. The jilly does not eat the inga. The jilly is ribald. The jilly canulate the cally. The inga incase the jilly. The inga tide the cally. The inga tide the jilly. The inga canulate the jilly. If something is reborn then it does not eat the cally. If something incase the jilly and the jilly tide the cally then it tide the inga. If something canulate the inga and the inga incase the jilly then the inga does not visit the cally. If the jilly incase the inga then the jilly is toned. If the inga does not visit the cally then the inga is not ribald. If something incase the inga and the inga is not ribald then it is vanished. The inga is not ribald.", "logic": "\nIncase(cally, jilly)\nIncase(cally, inga)\nTide(cally, inga)\nAsymptotic(cally)\nnot Canulate(cally, jilly)\nCanulate(cally, inga)\nIncase(jilly, cally)\nTide(jilly, cally)\nnot Tide(jilly, inga)\nRibald(jilly)\nCanulate(jilly, cally)\nIncase(inga, jilly)\nTide(inga, cally)\nTide(inga, jilly)\nCanulate(inga, jilly)\nforall x (Reborn(x) -> not Tide(x, cally))\nforall x (Incase(x, jilly) and Tide(jilly, cally) -> Tide(x, inga))\nforall x (Canulate(x, inga) and Incase(inga, jilly) -> not Canulate(inga, cally))\nIncase(jilly, inga) -> Toned(jilly)\nnot Canulate(inga, cally) -> not Ribald(inga)\nforall x (Incase(x, inga) and not Ribald(inga) -> Vanished(x))\n\nnot Ribald(inga)\n\nCanulate(cally, inga) and Incase(inga, jilly) and forall x (Canulate(x, inga) and Incase(inga, jilly) -> not Canulate(inga, cally)) -> therefore not Canulate(inga, cally) not Canulate(inga, cally) and not Canulate(inga, cally) -> not Ribald(inga) -> therefore not Ribald(inga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The audi waylay the mikel. The audi waylay the travers. The audi degauss the travers. The audi is belittling. The audi does not visit the mikel. The audi slant the travers. The mikel waylay the audi. The mikel degauss the audi. The mikel does not eat the travers. The mikel is bathyal. The mikel slant the audi. The travers waylay the mikel. The travers degauss the audi. The travers degauss the mikel. The travers slant the mikel. If something is squandered then it does not eat the audi. If something waylay the mikel and the mikel degauss the audi then it degauss the travers. If something slant the travers and the travers waylay the mikel then the travers does not visit the audi. If the mikel waylay the travers then the mikel is gaseous. If the travers does not visit the audi then the travers is not bathyal. If something waylay the travers and the travers is not bathyal then it is powered. The travers is bathyal.", "logic": "\nWaylay(audi, mikel)\nWaylay(audi, travers)\nDegauss(audi, travers)\nBelittling(audi)\nnot Slant(audi, mikel)\nSlant(audi, travers)\nWaylay(mikel, audi)\nDegauss(mikel, audi)\nnot Degauss(mikel, travers)\nBathyal(mikel)\nSlant(mikel, audi)\nWaylay(travers, mikel)\nDegauss(travers, audi)\nDegauss(travers, mikel)\nSlant(travers, mikel)\nforall x (Squandered(x) -> not Degauss(x, audi))\nforall x (Waylay(x, mikel) and Degauss(mikel, audi) -> Degauss(x, travers))\nforall x (Slant(x, travers) and Waylay(travers, mikel) -> not Slant(travers, audi))\nWaylay(mikel, travers) -> Gaseous(mikel)\nnot Slant(travers, audi) -> not Bathyal(travers)\nforall x (Waylay(x, travers) and not Bathyal(travers) -> Powered(x))\n\nBathyal(travers)\n\nSlant(audi, travers) and Waylay(travers, mikel) and forall x (Slant(x, travers) and Waylay(travers, mikel) -> not Slant(travers, audi)) -> therefore not Slant(travers, audi) not Slant(travers, audi) and not Slant(travers, audi) -> not Bathyal(travers) -> therefore not Bathyal(travers)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The shina wharf the kurt. The shina wharf the jobina. The shina wattle the jobina. The shina is imitation. The shina does not visit the kurt. The shina archaize the jobina. The kurt wharf the shina. The kurt wattle the shina. The kurt does not eat the jobina. The kurt is cissy. The kurt archaize the shina. The jobina wharf the kurt. The jobina wattle the shina. The jobina wattle the kurt. The jobina archaize the kurt. If something is aeolian then it does not eat the shina. If something wharf the kurt and the kurt wattle the shina then it wattle the jobina. If something archaize the jobina and the jobina wharf the kurt then the jobina does not visit the shina. If the kurt wharf the jobina then the kurt is uric. If the jobina does not visit the shina then the jobina is not cissy. If something wharf the jobina and the jobina is not cissy then it is charitable. The shina is charitable.", "logic": "\nWharf(shina, kurt)\nWharf(shina, jobina)\nWattle(shina, jobina)\nImitation(shina)\nnot Archaize(shina, kurt)\nArchaize(shina, jobina)\nWharf(kurt, shina)\nWattle(kurt, shina)\nnot Wattle(kurt, jobina)\nCissy(kurt)\nArchaize(kurt, shina)\nWharf(jobina, kurt)\nWattle(jobina, shina)\nWattle(jobina, kurt)\nArchaize(jobina, kurt)\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> not Wattle(x, shina))\nforall x (Wharf(x, kurt) and Wattle(kurt, shina) -> Wattle(x, jobina))\nforall x (Archaize(x, jobina) and Wharf(jobina, kurt) -> not Archaize(jobina, shina))\nWharf(kurt, jobina) -> Uric(kurt)\nnot Archaize(jobina, shina) -> not Cissy(jobina)\nforall x (Wharf(x, jobina) and not Cissy(jobina) -> Charitable(x))\n\nCharitable(shina)\n\nArchaize(shina, jobina) and Wharf(jobina, kurt) and forall x (Archaize(x, jobina) and Wharf(jobina, kurt) -> not Archaize(jobina, shina)) -> therefore not Archaize(jobina, shina) not Archaize(jobina, shina) and not Archaize(jobina, shina) -> not Cissy(jobina) -> therefore not Cissy(jobina) Wharf(shina, jobina) and not Cissy(jobina) and forall x (Wharf(x, jobina) and not Cissy(jobina) -> Charitable(x)) -> therefore Charitable(shina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The carmelina applaud the netti. The carmelina applaud the sibby. The carmelina allegorize the sibby. The carmelina is stagey. The carmelina does not visit the netti. The carmelina outcall the sibby. The netti applaud the carmelina. The netti allegorize the carmelina. The netti does not eat the sibby. The netti is salving. The netti outcall the carmelina. The sibby applaud the netti. The sibby allegorize the carmelina. The sibby allegorize the netti. The sibby outcall the netti. If something is wilted then it does not eat the carmelina. If something applaud the netti and the netti allegorize the carmelina then it allegorize the sibby. If something outcall the sibby and the sibby applaud the netti then the sibby does not visit the carmelina. If the netti applaud the sibby then the netti is festive. If the sibby does not visit the carmelina then the sibby is not salving. If something applaud the sibby and the sibby is not salving then it is bewitching. The carmelina is not bewitching.", "logic": "\nApplaud(carmelina, netti)\nApplaud(carmelina, sibby)\nAllegorize(carmelina, sibby)\nStagey(carmelina)\nnot Outcall(carmelina, netti)\nOutcall(carmelina, sibby)\nApplaud(netti, carmelina)\nAllegorize(netti, carmelina)\nnot Allegorize(netti, sibby)\nSalving(netti)\nOutcall(netti, carmelina)\nApplaud(sibby, netti)\nAllegorize(sibby, carmelina)\nAllegorize(sibby, netti)\nOutcall(sibby, netti)\nforall x (Wilted(x) -> not Allegorize(x, carmelina))\nforall x (Applaud(x, netti) and Allegorize(netti, carmelina) -> Allegorize(x, sibby))\nforall x (Outcall(x, sibby) and Applaud(sibby, netti) -> not Outcall(sibby, carmelina))\nApplaud(netti, sibby) -> Festive(netti)\nnot Outcall(sibby, carmelina) -> not Salving(sibby)\nforall x (Applaud(x, sibby) and not Salving(sibby) -> Bewitching(x))\n\nnot Bewitching(carmelina)\n\nOutcall(carmelina, sibby) and Applaud(sibby, netti) and forall x (Outcall(x, sibby) and Applaud(sibby, netti) -> not Outcall(sibby, carmelina)) -> therefore not Outcall(sibby, carmelina) not Outcall(sibby, carmelina) and not Outcall(sibby, carmelina) -> not Salving(sibby) -> therefore not Salving(sibby) Applaud(carmelina, sibby) and not Salving(sibby) and forall x (Applaud(x, sibby) and not Salving(sibby) -> Bewitching(x)) -> therefore Bewitching(carmelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The kariotta evangelise the jerrine. The kariotta evangelise the sol. The kariotta acetify the sol. The kariotta is blasting. The kariotta does not visit the jerrine. The kariotta suntan the sol. The jerrine evangelise the kariotta. The jerrine acetify the kariotta. The jerrine does not eat the sol. The jerrine is currish. The jerrine suntan the kariotta. The sol evangelise the jerrine. The sol acetify the kariotta. The sol acetify the jerrine. The sol suntan the jerrine. If something is homely then it does not eat the kariotta. If something evangelise the jerrine and the jerrine acetify the kariotta then it acetify the sol. If something suntan the sol and the sol evangelise the jerrine then the sol does not visit the kariotta. If the jerrine evangelise the sol then the jerrine is custodial. If the sol does not visit the kariotta then the sol is not currish. If something evangelise the sol and the sol is not currish then it is cruciform. The jerrine is not custodial.", "logic": "\nEvangelise(kariotta, jerrine)\nEvangelise(kariotta, sol)\nAcetify(kariotta, sol)\nBlasting(kariotta)\nnot Suntan(kariotta, jerrine)\nSuntan(kariotta, sol)\nEvangelise(jerrine, kariotta)\nAcetify(jerrine, kariotta)\nnot Acetify(jerrine, sol)\nCurrish(jerrine)\nSuntan(jerrine, kariotta)\nEvangelise(sol, jerrine)\nAcetify(sol, kariotta)\nAcetify(sol, jerrine)\nSuntan(sol, jerrine)\nforall x (Homely(x) -> not Acetify(x, kariotta))\nforall x (Evangelise(x, jerrine) and Acetify(jerrine, kariotta) -> Acetify(x, sol))\nforall x (Suntan(x, sol) and Evangelise(sol, jerrine) -> not Suntan(sol, kariotta))\nEvangelise(jerrine, sol) -> Custodial(jerrine)\nnot Suntan(sol, kariotta) -> not Currish(sol)\nforall x (Evangelise(x, sol) and not Currish(sol) -> Cruciform(x))\n\nnot Custodial(jerrine)\n\nEvangelise(jerrine, sol) -> Custodial(jerrine) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The russell bankrupt the germaine. The russell bankrupt the betta. The russell spotweld the betta. The russell is rustling. The russell does not visit the germaine. The russell rerun the betta. The germaine bankrupt the russell. The germaine spotweld the russell. The germaine does not eat the betta. The germaine is flameproof. The germaine rerun the russell. The betta bankrupt the germaine. The betta spotweld the russell. The betta spotweld the germaine. The betta rerun the germaine. If something is connective then it does not eat the russell. If something bankrupt the germaine and the germaine spotweld the russell then it spotweld the betta. If something rerun the betta and the betta bankrupt the germaine then the betta does not visit the russell. If the germaine bankrupt the betta then the germaine is impetuous. If the betta does not visit the russell then the betta is not flameproof. If something bankrupt the betta and the betta is not flameproof then it is hick. The germaine is hick.", "logic": "\nBankrupt(russell, germaine)\nBankrupt(russell, betta)\nSpotweld(russell, betta)\nRustling(russell)\nnot Rerun(russell, germaine)\nRerun(russell, betta)\nBankrupt(germaine, russell)\nSpotweld(germaine, russell)\nnot Spotweld(germaine, betta)\nFlameproof(germaine)\nRerun(germaine, russell)\nBankrupt(betta, germaine)\nSpotweld(betta, russell)\nSpotweld(betta, germaine)\nRerun(betta, germaine)\nforall x (Connective(x) -> not Spotweld(x, russell))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, germaine) and Spotweld(germaine, russell) -> Spotweld(x, betta))\nforall x (Rerun(x, betta) and Bankrupt(betta, germaine) -> not Rerun(betta, russell))\nBankrupt(germaine, betta) -> Impetuous(germaine)\nnot Rerun(betta, russell) -> not Flameproof(betta)\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, betta) and not Flameproof(betta) -> Hick(x))\n\nHick(germaine)\n\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, betta) and not Flameproof(betta) -> Hick(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The linda retract the ulises. The linda retract the christoph. The linda depolarise the christoph. The linda is acyclic. The linda does not visit the ulises. The linda repair the christoph. The ulises retract the linda. The ulises depolarise the linda. The ulises does not eat the christoph. The ulises is trojan. The ulises repair the linda. The christoph retract the ulises. The christoph depolarise the linda. The christoph depolarise the ulises. The christoph repair the ulises. If something is salientian then it does not eat the linda. If something retract the ulises and the ulises depolarise the linda then it depolarise the christoph. If something repair the christoph and the christoph retract the ulises then the christoph does not visit the linda. If the ulises retract the christoph then the ulises is adscripted. If the christoph does not visit the linda then the christoph is not trojan. If something retract the christoph and the christoph is not trojan then it is unfretted. The christoph is not unfretted.", "logic": "\nRetract(linda, ulises)\nRetract(linda, christoph)\nDepolarise(linda, christoph)\nAcyclic(linda)\nnot Repair(linda, ulises)\nRepair(linda, christoph)\nRetract(ulises, linda)\nDepolarise(ulises, linda)\nnot Depolarise(ulises, christoph)\nTrojan(ulises)\nRepair(ulises, linda)\nRetract(christoph, ulises)\nDepolarise(christoph, linda)\nDepolarise(christoph, ulises)\nRepair(christoph, ulises)\nforall x (Salientian(x) -> not Depolarise(x, linda))\nforall x (Retract(x, ulises) and Depolarise(ulises, linda) -> Depolarise(x, christoph))\nforall x (Repair(x, christoph) and Retract(christoph, ulises) -> not Repair(christoph, linda))\nRetract(ulises, christoph) -> Adscripted(ulises)\nnot Repair(christoph, linda) -> not Trojan(christoph)\nforall x (Retract(x, christoph) and not Trojan(christoph) -> Unfretted(x))\n\nnot Unfretted(christoph)\n\nforall x (Retract(x, christoph) and not Trojan(christoph) -> Unfretted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The worth mill the merci. The worth mill the skell. The worth encounter the skell. The worth is buttery. The worth does not visit the merci. The worth reprove the skell. The merci mill the worth. The merci encounter the worth. The merci does not eat the skell. The merci is ariose. The merci reprove the worth. The skell mill the merci. The skell encounter the worth. The skell encounter the merci. The skell reprove the merci. If something is subscribed then it does not eat the worth. If something mill the merci and the merci encounter the worth then it encounter the skell. If something reprove the skell and the skell mill the merci then the skell does not visit the worth. If the merci mill the skell then the merci is isoclinal. If the skell does not visit the worth then the skell is not ariose. If something mill the skell and the skell is not ariose then it is dirt. The skell mill the worth.", "logic": "\nMill(worth, merci)\nMill(worth, skell)\nEncounter(worth, skell)\nButtery(worth)\nnot Reprove(worth, merci)\nReprove(worth, skell)\nMill(merci, worth)\nEncounter(merci, worth)\nnot Encounter(merci, skell)\nAriose(merci)\nReprove(merci, worth)\nMill(skell, merci)\nEncounter(skell, worth)\nEncounter(skell, merci)\nReprove(skell, merci)\nforall x (Subscribed(x) -> not Encounter(x, worth))\nforall x (Mill(x, merci) and Encounter(merci, worth) -> Encounter(x, skell))\nforall x (Reprove(x, skell) and Mill(skell, merci) -> not Reprove(skell, worth))\nMill(merci, skell) -> Isoclinal(merci)\nnot Reprove(skell, worth) -> not Ariose(skell)\nforall x (Mill(x, skell) and not Ariose(skell) -> Dirt(x))\n\nMill(skell, worth)\n\nMill(skell, worth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The peggy overstock the ninetta. The peggy overstock the claribel. The peggy open the claribel. The peggy is dutiful. The peggy does not visit the ninetta. The peggy dismay the claribel. The ninetta overstock the peggy. The ninetta open the peggy. The ninetta does not eat the claribel. The ninetta is sinuate. The ninetta dismay the peggy. The claribel overstock the ninetta. The claribel open the peggy. The claribel open the ninetta. The claribel dismay the ninetta. If something is gaumless then it does not eat the peggy. If something overstock the ninetta and the ninetta open the peggy then it open the claribel. If something dismay the claribel and the claribel overstock the ninetta then the claribel does not visit the peggy. If the ninetta overstock the claribel then the ninetta is deviate. If the claribel does not visit the peggy then the claribel is not sinuate. If something overstock the claribel and the claribel is not sinuate then it is grungy. The ninetta does not chase the ninetta.", "logic": "\nOverstock(peggy, ninetta)\nOverstock(peggy, claribel)\nOpen(peggy, claribel)\nDutiful(peggy)\nnot Dismay(peggy, ninetta)\nDismay(peggy, claribel)\nOverstock(ninetta, peggy)\nOpen(ninetta, peggy)\nnot Open(ninetta, claribel)\nSinuate(ninetta)\nDismay(ninetta, peggy)\nOverstock(claribel, ninetta)\nOpen(claribel, peggy)\nOpen(claribel, ninetta)\nDismay(claribel, ninetta)\nforall x (Gaumless(x) -> not Open(x, peggy))\nforall x (Overstock(x, ninetta) and Open(ninetta, peggy) -> Open(x, claribel))\nforall x (Dismay(x, claribel) and Overstock(claribel, ninetta) -> not Dismay(claribel, peggy))\nOverstock(ninetta, claribel) -> Deviate(ninetta)\nnot Dismay(claribel, peggy) -> not Sinuate(claribel)\nforall x (Overstock(x, claribel) and not Sinuate(claribel) -> Grungy(x))\n\nnot Overstock(ninetta, ninetta)\n\nnot Overstock(ninetta, ninetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The staford clown the amabel. The staford clown the lusa. The staford centralise the lusa. The staford is nonplused. The staford does not visit the amabel. The staford blether the lusa. The amabel clown the staford. The amabel centralise the staford. The amabel does not eat the lusa. The amabel is endangered. The amabel blether the staford. The lusa clown the amabel. The lusa centralise the staford. The lusa centralise the amabel. The lusa blether the amabel. If something is backstairs then it does not eat the staford. If something clown the amabel and the amabel centralise the staford then it centralise the lusa. If something blether the lusa and the lusa clown the amabel then the lusa does not visit the staford. If the amabel clown the lusa then the amabel is mortuary. If the lusa does not visit the staford then the lusa is not endangered. If something clown the lusa and the lusa is not endangered then it is rusty. The lusa clown the lusa.", "logic": "\nClown(staford, amabel)\nClown(staford, lusa)\nCentralise(staford, lusa)\nNonplused(staford)\nnot Blether(staford, amabel)\nBlether(staford, lusa)\nClown(amabel, staford)\nCentralise(amabel, staford)\nnot Centralise(amabel, lusa)\nEndangered(amabel)\nBlether(amabel, staford)\nClown(lusa, amabel)\nCentralise(lusa, staford)\nCentralise(lusa, amabel)\nBlether(lusa, amabel)\nforall x (Backstairs(x) -> not Centralise(x, staford))\nforall x (Clown(x, amabel) and Centralise(amabel, staford) -> Centralise(x, lusa))\nforall x (Blether(x, lusa) and Clown(lusa, amabel) -> not Blether(lusa, staford))\nClown(amabel, lusa) -> Mortuary(amabel)\nnot Blether(lusa, staford) -> not Endangered(lusa)\nforall x (Clown(x, lusa) and not Endangered(lusa) -> Rusty(x))\n\nClown(lusa, lusa)\n\nClown(lusa, lusa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The reina halloo the tailor. The reina halloo the tadeas. The reina embargo the tadeas. The reina is thankless. The reina does not visit the tailor. The reina glitter the tadeas. The tailor halloo the reina. The tailor embargo the reina. The tailor does not eat the tadeas. The tailor is leonine. The tailor glitter the reina. The tadeas halloo the tailor. The tadeas embargo the reina. The tadeas embargo the tailor. The tadeas glitter the tailor. If something is firm then it does not eat the reina. If something halloo the tailor and the tailor embargo the reina then it embargo the tadeas. If something glitter the tadeas and the tadeas halloo the tailor then the tadeas does not visit the reina. If the tailor halloo the tadeas then the tailor is brickly. If the tadeas does not visit the reina then the tadeas is not leonine. If something halloo the tadeas and the tadeas is not leonine then it is tactical. The tailor does not chase the tadeas.", "logic": "\nHalloo(reina, tailor)\nHalloo(reina, tadeas)\nEmbargo(reina, tadeas)\nThankless(reina)\nnot Glitter(reina, tailor)\nGlitter(reina, tadeas)\nHalloo(tailor, reina)\nEmbargo(tailor, reina)\nnot Embargo(tailor, tadeas)\nLeonine(tailor)\nGlitter(tailor, reina)\nHalloo(tadeas, tailor)\nEmbargo(tadeas, reina)\nEmbargo(tadeas, tailor)\nGlitter(tadeas, tailor)\nforall x (Firm(x) -> not Embargo(x, reina))\nforall x (Halloo(x, tailor) and Embargo(tailor, reina) -> Embargo(x, tadeas))\nforall x (Glitter(x, tadeas) and Halloo(tadeas, tailor) -> not Glitter(tadeas, reina))\nHalloo(tailor, tadeas) -> Brickly(tailor)\nnot Glitter(tadeas, reina) -> not Leonine(tadeas)\nforall x (Halloo(x, tadeas) and not Leonine(tadeas) -> Tactical(x))\n\nnot Halloo(tailor, tadeas)\n\nnot Halloo(tailor, tadeas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The ursulina whip the chrissy. The ursulina whip the gregor. The ursulina abound the gregor. The ursulina is lengthwise. The ursulina does not visit the chrissy. The ursulina mongrelize the gregor. The chrissy whip the ursulina. The chrissy abound the ursulina. The chrissy does not eat the gregor. The chrissy is viewable. The chrissy mongrelize the ursulina. The gregor whip the chrissy. The gregor abound the ursulina. The gregor abound the chrissy. The gregor mongrelize the chrissy. If something is casteless then it does not eat the ursulina. If something whip the chrissy and the chrissy abound the ursulina then it abound the gregor. If something mongrelize the gregor and the gregor whip the chrissy then the gregor does not visit the ursulina. If the chrissy whip the gregor then the chrissy is dulled. If the gregor does not visit the ursulina then the gregor is not viewable. If something whip the gregor and the gregor is not viewable then it is potential. The ursulina mongrelize the ursulina.", "logic": "\nWhip(ursulina, chrissy)\nWhip(ursulina, gregor)\nAbound(ursulina, gregor)\nLengthwise(ursulina)\nnot Mongrelize(ursulina, chrissy)\nMongrelize(ursulina, gregor)\nWhip(chrissy, ursulina)\nAbound(chrissy, ursulina)\nnot Abound(chrissy, gregor)\nViewable(chrissy)\nMongrelize(chrissy, ursulina)\nWhip(gregor, chrissy)\nAbound(gregor, ursulina)\nAbound(gregor, chrissy)\nMongrelize(gregor, chrissy)\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> not Abound(x, ursulina))\nforall x (Whip(x, chrissy) and Abound(chrissy, ursulina) -> Abound(x, gregor))\nforall x (Mongrelize(x, gregor) and Whip(gregor, chrissy) -> not Mongrelize(gregor, ursulina))\nWhip(chrissy, gregor) -> Dulled(chrissy)\nnot Mongrelize(gregor, ursulina) -> not Viewable(gregor)\nforall x (Whip(x, gregor) and not Viewable(gregor) -> Potential(x))\n\nMongrelize(ursulina, ursulina)\n\nMongrelize(ursulina, ursulina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "Godfrey is uniate. Godfrey is isoclinic. Godfrey is seemly. If something is annexal and uniate then it is dimorphic. If Godfrey is umbellar then Godfrey is obnoxious. If something is seemly then it is umbellar. Blue, uniate things are umbellar. All obnoxious things are annexal. If something is seemly and not umbellar then it is isoclinic. Godfrey is isoclinic.", "logic": "\nUniate(godfrey)\nIsoclinic(godfrey)\nSeemly(godfrey)\nforall x (Annexal(x) and Uniate(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\nUmbellar(godfrey) -> Obnoxious(godfrey)\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> Umbellar(x))\nforall x (Annexal(x) and Uniate(x) -> Umbellar(x))\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) -> Annexal(x))\nforall x (Seemly(x) and not Umbellar(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\n\nIsoclinic(godfrey)\n\ntherefore Isoclinic(godfrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Clayborne is brasslike. Clayborne is lxxv. Clayborne is cattish. If something is undone and brasslike then it is oversewn. If Clayborne is saltlike then Clayborne is lactic. If something is cattish then it is saltlike. Blue, brasslike things are saltlike. All lactic things are undone. If something is cattish and not saltlike then it is lxxv. Clayborne is not lxxv.", "logic": "\nBrasslike(clayborne)\nLxxv(clayborne)\nCattish(clayborne)\nforall x (Undone(x) and Brasslike(x) -> Oversewn(x))\nSaltlike(clayborne) -> Lactic(clayborne)\nforall x (Cattish(x) -> Saltlike(x))\nforall x (Undone(x) and Brasslike(x) -> Saltlike(x))\nforall x (Lactic(x) -> Undone(x))\nforall x (Cattish(x) and not Saltlike(x) -> Lxxv(x))\n\nnot Lxxv(clayborne)\n\ntherefore Lxxv(clayborne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Dian is sixfold. Dian is philippine. Dian is priapic. If something is thermic and sixfold then it is recusant. If Dian is maledict then Dian is sightless. If something is priapic then it is maledict. Blue, sixfold things are maledict. All sightless things are thermic. If something is priapic and not maledict then it is philippine. Dian is maledict.", "logic": "\nSixfold(dian)\nPhilippine(dian)\nPriapic(dian)\nforall x (Thermic(x) and Sixfold(x) -> Recusant(x))\nMaledict(dian) -> Sightless(dian)\nforall x (Priapic(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Thermic(x) and Sixfold(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Sightless(x) -> Thermic(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) and not Maledict(x) -> Philippine(x))\n\nMaledict(dian)\n\nPriapic(dian) and forall x (Priapic(x) -> Maledict(x)) -> therefore Maledict(dian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Annamarie is unquiet. Annamarie is horary. Annamarie is expectant. If something is left and unquiet then it is cordate. If Annamarie is prehensile then Annamarie is topologic. If something is expectant then it is prehensile. Blue, unquiet things are prehensile. All topologic things are left. If something is expectant and not prehensile then it is horary. Annamarie is not prehensile.", "logic": "\nUnquiet(annamarie)\nHorary(annamarie)\nExpectant(annamarie)\nforall x (Left(x) and Unquiet(x) -> Cordate(x))\nPrehensile(annamarie) -> Topologic(annamarie)\nforall x (Expectant(x) -> Prehensile(x))\nforall x (Left(x) and Unquiet(x) -> Prehensile(x))\nforall x (Topologic(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Expectant(x) and not Prehensile(x) -> Horary(x))\n\nnot Prehensile(annamarie)\n\nExpectant(annamarie) and forall x (Expectant(x) -> Prehensile(x)) -> therefore Prehensile(annamarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Martina is divisive. Martina is esoteric. Martina is incredible. If something is penitent and divisive then it is unshod. If Martina is kampuchean then Martina is powerless. If something is incredible then it is kampuchean. Blue, divisive things are kampuchean. All powerless things are penitent. If something is incredible and not kampuchean then it is esoteric. Martina is powerless.", "logic": "\nDivisive(martina)\nEsoteric(martina)\nIncredible(martina)\nforall x (Penitent(x) and Divisive(x) -> Unshod(x))\nKampuchean(martina) -> Powerless(martina)\nforall x (Incredible(x) -> Kampuchean(x))\nforall x (Penitent(x) and Divisive(x) -> Kampuchean(x))\nforall x (Powerless(x) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Incredible(x) and not Kampuchean(x) -> Esoteric(x))\n\nPowerless(martina)\n\nIncredible(martina) and forall x (Incredible(x) -> Kampuchean(x)) -> therefore Kampuchean(martina) Kampuchean(martina) and Kampuchean(martina) -> Powerless(martina) -> therefore Powerless(martina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Karry is protozoic. Karry is hidrotic. Karry is punishing. If something is retired and protozoic then it is strained. If Karry is under then Karry is scraggly. If something is punishing then it is under. Blue, protozoic things are under. All scraggly things are retired. If something is punishing and not under then it is hidrotic. Karry is not scraggly.", "logic": "\nProtozoic(karry)\nHidrotic(karry)\nPunishing(karry)\nforall x (Retired(x) and Protozoic(x) -> Strained(x))\nUnder(karry) -> Scraggly(karry)\nforall x (Punishing(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Retired(x) and Protozoic(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Scraggly(x) -> Retired(x))\nforall x (Punishing(x) and not Under(x) -> Hidrotic(x))\n\nnot Scraggly(karry)\n\nPunishing(karry) and forall x (Punishing(x) -> Under(x)) -> therefore Under(karry) Under(karry) and Under(karry) -> Scraggly(karry) -> therefore Scraggly(karry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Katuscha is unrealized. Katuscha is intriguing. Katuscha is plundered. If something is eightfold and unrealized then it is jain. If Katuscha is compounded then Katuscha is pareve. If something is plundered then it is compounded. Blue, unrealized things are compounded. All pareve things are eightfold. If something is plundered and not compounded then it is intriguing. Katuscha is eightfold.", "logic": "\nUnrealized(katuscha)\nIntriguing(katuscha)\nPlundered(katuscha)\nforall x (Eightfold(x) and Unrealized(x) -> Jain(x))\nCompounded(katuscha) -> Pareve(katuscha)\nforall x (Plundered(x) -> Compounded(x))\nforall x (Eightfold(x) and Unrealized(x) -> Compounded(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Eightfold(x))\nforall x (Plundered(x) and not Compounded(x) -> Intriguing(x))\n\nEightfold(katuscha)\n\nPlundered(katuscha) and forall x (Plundered(x) -> Compounded(x)) -> therefore Compounded(katuscha) Compounded(katuscha) and Compounded(katuscha) -> Pareve(katuscha) -> therefore Pareve(katuscha) Pareve(katuscha) and forall x (Pareve(x) -> Eightfold(x)) -> therefore Eightfold(katuscha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Marlyn is acerate. Marlyn is shivery. Marlyn is balking. If something is romish and acerate then it is loamless. If Marlyn is unsoluble then Marlyn is orphaned. If something is balking then it is unsoluble. Blue, acerate things are unsoluble. All orphaned things are romish. If something is balking and not unsoluble then it is shivery. Marlyn is not romish.", "logic": "\nAcerate(marlyn)\nShivery(marlyn)\nBalking(marlyn)\nforall x (Romish(x) and Acerate(x) -> Loamless(x))\nUnsoluble(marlyn) -> Orphaned(marlyn)\nforall x (Balking(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Romish(x) and Acerate(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Orphaned(x) -> Romish(x))\nforall x (Balking(x) and not Unsoluble(x) -> Shivery(x))\n\nnot Romish(marlyn)\n\nBalking(marlyn) and forall x (Balking(x) -> Unsoluble(x)) -> therefore Unsoluble(marlyn) Unsoluble(marlyn) and Unsoluble(marlyn) -> Orphaned(marlyn) -> therefore Orphaned(marlyn) Orphaned(marlyn) and forall x (Orphaned(x) -> Romish(x)) -> therefore Romish(marlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The morton counter the micki. The morton counter the rivalee. The morton unroll the rivalee. The morton is whispering. The morton is alloyed. The morton scrounge the micki. The morton scrounge the rivalee. The micki unroll the morton. The micki is whispering. The micki is blustery. The micki is coordinate. The rivalee unroll the micki. The rivalee is autacoidal. The rivalee is coordinate. The rivalee scrounge the micki. If something counter the morton and it is blustery then it counter the rivalee. If something is autacoidal and whispering then it scrounge the morton. If something is coordinate then it is autacoidal. If something scrounge the rivalee then it is coordinate. If the micki counter the rivalee and the rivalee unroll the micki then the rivalee is coordinate. If something scrounge the morton then the morton unroll the rivalee. The rivalee unroll the micki.", "logic": "\nCounter(morton, micki)\nCounter(morton, rivalee)\nUnroll(morton, rivalee)\nWhispering(morton)\nAlloyed(morton)\nScrounge(morton, micki)\nScrounge(morton, rivalee)\nUnroll(micki, morton)\nWhispering(micki)\nBlustery(micki)\nCoordinate(micki)\nUnroll(rivalee, micki)\nAutacoidal(rivalee)\nCoordinate(rivalee)\nScrounge(rivalee, micki)\nforall x (Counter(x, morton) and Blustery(x) -> Counter(x, rivalee))\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and Whispering(x) -> Scrounge(x, morton))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, rivalee) -> Coordinate(x))\nCounter(micki, rivalee) and Unroll(rivalee, micki) -> Coordinate(rivalee)\nforall x (Scrounge(x, morton) -> Unroll(morton, rivalee))\n\nUnroll(rivalee, micki)\n\ntherefore Unroll(rivalee, micki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The adrianne handcraft the kissiah. The adrianne handcraft the vassily. The adrianne remand the vassily. The adrianne is anile. The adrianne is phagocytic. The adrianne josh the kissiah. The adrianne josh the vassily. The kissiah remand the adrianne. The kissiah is anile. The kissiah is mensurable. The kissiah is copesettic. The vassily remand the kissiah. The vassily is unsavoury. The vassily is copesettic. The vassily josh the kissiah. If something handcraft the adrianne and it is mensurable then it handcraft the vassily. If something is unsavoury and anile then it josh the adrianne. If something is copesettic then it is unsavoury. If something josh the vassily then it is copesettic. If the kissiah handcraft the vassily and the vassily remand the kissiah then the vassily is copesettic. If something josh the adrianne then the adrianne remand the vassily. The adrianne is not anile.", "logic": "\nHandcraft(adrianne, kissiah)\nHandcraft(adrianne, vassily)\nRemand(adrianne, vassily)\nAnile(adrianne)\nPhagocytic(adrianne)\nJosh(adrianne, kissiah)\nJosh(adrianne, vassily)\nRemand(kissiah, adrianne)\nAnile(kissiah)\nMensurable(kissiah)\nCopesettic(kissiah)\nRemand(vassily, kissiah)\nUnsavoury(vassily)\nCopesettic(vassily)\nJosh(vassily, kissiah)\nforall x (Handcraft(x, adrianne) and Mensurable(x) -> Handcraft(x, vassily))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) and Anile(x) -> Josh(x, adrianne))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Unsavoury(x))\nforall x (Josh(x, vassily) -> Copesettic(x))\nHandcraft(kissiah, vassily) and Remand(vassily, kissiah) -> Copesettic(vassily)\nforall x (Josh(x, adrianne) -> Remand(adrianne, vassily))\n\nnot Anile(adrianne)\n\ntherefore Anile(adrianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The beowulf avoid the tilda. The beowulf avoid the marna. The beowulf pipe the marna. The beowulf is amnesiac. The beowulf is onshore. The beowulf tout the tilda. The beowulf tout the marna. The tilda pipe the beowulf. The tilda is amnesiac. The tilda is asserting. The tilda is piquant. The marna pipe the tilda. The marna is secondary. The marna is piquant. The marna tout the tilda. If something avoid the beowulf and it is asserting then it avoid the marna. If something is secondary and amnesiac then it tout the beowulf. If something is piquant then it is secondary. If something tout the marna then it is piquant. If the tilda avoid the marna and the marna pipe the tilda then the marna is piquant. If something tout the beowulf then the beowulf pipe the marna. The tilda is secondary.", "logic": "\nAvoid(beowulf, tilda)\nAvoid(beowulf, marna)\nPipe(beowulf, marna)\nAmnesiac(beowulf)\nOnshore(beowulf)\nTout(beowulf, tilda)\nTout(beowulf, marna)\nPipe(tilda, beowulf)\nAmnesiac(tilda)\nAsserting(tilda)\nPiquant(tilda)\nPipe(marna, tilda)\nSecondary(marna)\nPiquant(marna)\nTout(marna, tilda)\nforall x (Avoid(x, beowulf) and Asserting(x) -> Avoid(x, marna))\nforall x (Secondary(x) and Amnesiac(x) -> Tout(x, beowulf))\nforall x (Piquant(x) -> Secondary(x))\nforall x (Tout(x, marna) -> Piquant(x))\nAvoid(tilda, marna) and Pipe(marna, tilda) -> Piquant(marna)\nforall x (Tout(x, beowulf) -> Pipe(beowulf, marna))\n\nSecondary(tilda)\n\nPiquant(tilda) and forall x (Piquant(x) -> Secondary(x)) -> therefore Secondary(tilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The anatola inmarry the bendite. The anatola inmarry the leila. The anatola leach the leila. The anatola is helminthic. The anatola is banausic. The anatola spiral the bendite. The anatola spiral the leila. The bendite leach the anatola. The bendite is helminthic. The bendite is directive. The bendite is apparent. The leila leach the bendite. The leila is abysmal. The leila is apparent. The leila spiral the bendite. If something inmarry the anatola and it is directive then it inmarry the leila. If something is abysmal and helminthic then it spiral the anatola. If something is apparent then it is abysmal. If something spiral the leila then it is apparent. If the bendite inmarry the leila and the leila leach the bendite then the leila is apparent. If something spiral the anatola then the anatola leach the leila. The bendite is not abysmal.", "logic": "\nInmarry(anatola, bendite)\nInmarry(anatola, leila)\nLeach(anatola, leila)\nHelminthic(anatola)\nBanausic(anatola)\nSpiral(anatola, bendite)\nSpiral(anatola, leila)\nLeach(bendite, anatola)\nHelminthic(bendite)\nDirective(bendite)\nApparent(bendite)\nLeach(leila, bendite)\nAbysmal(leila)\nApparent(leila)\nSpiral(leila, bendite)\nforall x (Inmarry(x, anatola) and Directive(x) -> Inmarry(x, leila))\nforall x (Abysmal(x) and Helminthic(x) -> Spiral(x, anatola))\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Abysmal(x))\nforall x (Spiral(x, leila) -> Apparent(x))\nInmarry(bendite, leila) and Leach(leila, bendite) -> Apparent(leila)\nforall x (Spiral(x, anatola) -> Leach(anatola, leila))\n\nnot Abysmal(bendite)\n\nApparent(bendite) and forall x (Apparent(x) -> Abysmal(x)) -> therefore Abysmal(bendite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The dan undergrow the mariska. The dan undergrow the celestia. The dan swop the celestia. The dan is frowning. The dan is clad. The dan mistake the mariska. The dan mistake the celestia. The mariska swop the dan. The mariska is frowning. The mariska is municipal. The mariska is troubling. The celestia swop the mariska. The celestia is disguised. The celestia is troubling. The celestia mistake the mariska. If something undergrow the dan and it is municipal then it undergrow the celestia. If something is disguised and frowning then it mistake the dan. If something is troubling then it is disguised. If something mistake the celestia then it is troubling. If the mariska undergrow the celestia and the celestia swop the mariska then the celestia is troubling. If something mistake the dan then the dan swop the celestia. The mariska mistake the dan.", "logic": "\nUndergrow(dan, mariska)\nUndergrow(dan, celestia)\nSwop(dan, celestia)\nFrowning(dan)\nClad(dan)\nMistake(dan, mariska)\nMistake(dan, celestia)\nSwop(mariska, dan)\nFrowning(mariska)\nMunicipal(mariska)\nTroubling(mariska)\nSwop(celestia, mariska)\nDisguised(celestia)\nTroubling(celestia)\nMistake(celestia, mariska)\nforall x (Undergrow(x, dan) and Municipal(x) -> Undergrow(x, celestia))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and Frowning(x) -> Mistake(x, dan))\nforall x (Troubling(x) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Mistake(x, celestia) -> Troubling(x))\nUndergrow(mariska, celestia) and Swop(celestia, mariska) -> Troubling(celestia)\nforall x (Mistake(x, dan) -> Swop(dan, celestia))\n\nMistake(mariska, dan)\n\nTroubling(mariska) and forall x (Troubling(x) -> Disguised(x)) -> therefore Disguised(mariska) Disguised(mariska) and Frowning(mariska) and forall x (Disguised(x) and Frowning(x) -> Mistake(x, dan)) -> therefore Mistake(mariska, dan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The dolorita hasp the magnus. The dolorita hasp the annabel. The dolorita medicate the annabel. The dolorita is changeful. The dolorita is chelated. The dolorita rebuild the magnus. The dolorita rebuild the annabel. The magnus medicate the dolorita. The magnus is changeful. The magnus is prideful. The magnus is epiphyseal. The annabel medicate the magnus. The annabel is escaped. The annabel is epiphyseal. The annabel rebuild the magnus. If something hasp the dolorita and it is prideful then it hasp the annabel. If something is escaped and changeful then it rebuild the dolorita. If something is epiphyseal then it is escaped. If something rebuild the annabel then it is epiphyseal. If the magnus hasp the annabel and the annabel medicate the magnus then the annabel is epiphyseal. If something rebuild the dolorita then the dolorita medicate the annabel. The dolorita is not escaped.", "logic": "\nHasp(dolorita, magnus)\nHasp(dolorita, annabel)\nMedicate(dolorita, annabel)\nChangeful(dolorita)\nChelated(dolorita)\nRebuild(dolorita, magnus)\nRebuild(dolorita, annabel)\nMedicate(magnus, dolorita)\nChangeful(magnus)\nPrideful(magnus)\nEpiphyseal(magnus)\nMedicate(annabel, magnus)\nEscaped(annabel)\nEpiphyseal(annabel)\nRebuild(annabel, magnus)\nforall x (Hasp(x, dolorita) and Prideful(x) -> Hasp(x, annabel))\nforall x (Escaped(x) and Changeful(x) -> Rebuild(x, dolorita))\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Escaped(x))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, annabel) -> Epiphyseal(x))\nHasp(magnus, annabel) and Medicate(annabel, magnus) -> Epiphyseal(annabel)\nforall x (Rebuild(x, dolorita) -> Medicate(dolorita, annabel))\n\nnot Escaped(dolorita)\n\nRebuild(dolorita, annabel) and forall x (Rebuild(x, annabel) -> Epiphyseal(x)) -> therefore Epiphyseal(dolorita) Epiphyseal(dolorita) and forall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Escaped(x)) -> therefore Escaped(dolorita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The missie trade the thia. The missie trade the mala. The missie hobble the mala. The missie is intrinsic. The missie is steadfast. The missie demarcate the thia. The missie demarcate the mala. The thia hobble the missie. The thia is intrinsic. The thia is conventual. The thia is impelling. The mala hobble the thia. The mala is abroach. The mala is impelling. The mala demarcate the thia. If something trade the missie and it is conventual then it trade the mala. If something is abroach and intrinsic then it demarcate the missie. If something is impelling then it is abroach. If something demarcate the mala then it is impelling. If the thia trade the mala and the mala hobble the thia then the mala is impelling. If something demarcate the missie then the missie hobble the mala. The missie demarcate the missie.", "logic": "\nTrade(missie, thia)\nTrade(missie, mala)\nHobble(missie, mala)\nIntrinsic(missie)\nSteadfast(missie)\nDemarcate(missie, thia)\nDemarcate(missie, mala)\nHobble(thia, missie)\nIntrinsic(thia)\nConventual(thia)\nImpelling(thia)\nHobble(mala, thia)\nAbroach(mala)\nImpelling(mala)\nDemarcate(mala, thia)\nforall x (Trade(x, missie) and Conventual(x) -> Trade(x, mala))\nforall x (Abroach(x) and Intrinsic(x) -> Demarcate(x, missie))\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> Abroach(x))\nforall x (Demarcate(x, mala) -> Impelling(x))\nTrade(thia, mala) and Hobble(mala, thia) -> Impelling(mala)\nforall x (Demarcate(x, missie) -> Hobble(missie, mala))\n\nDemarcate(missie, missie)\n\nDemarcate(missie, mala) and forall x (Demarcate(x, mala) -> Impelling(x)) -> therefore Impelling(missie) Impelling(missie) and forall x (Impelling(x) -> Abroach(x)) -> therefore Abroach(missie) Abroach(missie) and Intrinsic(missie) and forall x (Abroach(x) and Intrinsic(x) -> Demarcate(x, missie)) -> therefore Demarcate(missie, missie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The salomone tribulate the vinita. The salomone tribulate the petr. The salomone dispirit the petr. The salomone is neurotoxic. The salomone is attached. The salomone obturate the vinita. The salomone obturate the petr. The vinita dispirit the salomone. The vinita is neurotoxic. The vinita is priceless. The vinita is biform. The petr dispirit the vinita. The petr is reefy. The petr is biform. The petr obturate the vinita. If something tribulate the salomone and it is priceless then it tribulate the petr. If something is reefy and neurotoxic then it obturate the salomone. If something is biform then it is reefy. If something obturate the petr then it is biform. If the vinita tribulate the petr and the petr dispirit the vinita then the petr is biform. If something obturate the salomone then the salomone dispirit the petr. The salomone does not see the salomone.", "logic": "\nTribulate(salomone, vinita)\nTribulate(salomone, petr)\nDispirit(salomone, petr)\nNeurotoxic(salomone)\nAttached(salomone)\nObturate(salomone, vinita)\nObturate(salomone, petr)\nDispirit(vinita, salomone)\nNeurotoxic(vinita)\nPriceless(vinita)\nBiform(vinita)\nDispirit(petr, vinita)\nReefy(petr)\nBiform(petr)\nObturate(petr, vinita)\nforall x (Tribulate(x, salomone) and Priceless(x) -> Tribulate(x, petr))\nforall x (Reefy(x) and Neurotoxic(x) -> Obturate(x, salomone))\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Reefy(x))\nforall x (Obturate(x, petr) -> Biform(x))\nTribulate(vinita, petr) and Dispirit(petr, vinita) -> Biform(petr)\nforall x (Obturate(x, salomone) -> Dispirit(salomone, petr))\n\nnot Obturate(salomone, salomone)\n\nObturate(salomone, petr) and forall x (Obturate(x, petr) -> Biform(x)) -> therefore Biform(salomone) Biform(salomone) and forall x (Biform(x) -> Reefy(x)) -> therefore Reefy(salomone) Reefy(salomone) and Neurotoxic(salomone) and forall x (Reefy(x) and Neurotoxic(x) -> Obturate(x, salomone)) -> therefore Obturate(salomone, salomone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The sherrie actuate the lynsey. The sherrie actuate the seana. The sherrie perceive the seana. The sherrie is exposed. The sherrie is integral. The sherrie citrate the lynsey. The sherrie citrate the seana. The lynsey perceive the sherrie. The lynsey is exposed. The lynsey is autotypic. The lynsey is obstructed. The seana perceive the lynsey. The seana is slippered. The seana is obstructed. The seana citrate the lynsey. If something actuate the sherrie and it is autotypic then it actuate the seana. If something is slippered and exposed then it citrate the sherrie. If something is obstructed then it is slippered. If something citrate the seana then it is obstructed. If the lynsey actuate the seana and the seana perceive the lynsey then the seana is obstructed. If something citrate the sherrie then the sherrie perceive the seana. The seana does not see the sherrie.", "logic": "\nActuate(sherrie, lynsey)\nActuate(sherrie, seana)\nPerceive(sherrie, seana)\nExposed(sherrie)\nIntegral(sherrie)\nCitrate(sherrie, lynsey)\nCitrate(sherrie, seana)\nPerceive(lynsey, sherrie)\nExposed(lynsey)\nAutotypic(lynsey)\nObstructed(lynsey)\nPerceive(seana, lynsey)\nSlippered(seana)\nObstructed(seana)\nCitrate(seana, lynsey)\nforall x (Actuate(x, sherrie) and Autotypic(x) -> Actuate(x, seana))\nforall x (Slippered(x) and Exposed(x) -> Citrate(x, sherrie))\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Slippered(x))\nforall x (Citrate(x, seana) -> Obstructed(x))\nActuate(lynsey, seana) and Perceive(seana, lynsey) -> Obstructed(seana)\nforall x (Citrate(x, sherrie) -> Perceive(sherrie, seana))\n\nnot Citrate(seana, sherrie)\n\nforall x (Slippered(x) and Exposed(x) -> Citrate(x, sherrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The cyndy trellis the thatcher. The cyndy trellis the piper. The cyndy inmarry the piper. The cyndy is lugubrious. The cyndy is logistic. The cyndy banish the thatcher. The cyndy banish the piper. The thatcher inmarry the cyndy. The thatcher is lugubrious. The thatcher is obvious. The thatcher is laudable. The piper inmarry the thatcher. The piper is granulose. The piper is laudable. The piper banish the thatcher. If something trellis the cyndy and it is obvious then it trellis the piper. If something is granulose and lugubrious then it banish the cyndy. If something is laudable then it is granulose. If something banish the piper then it is laudable. If the thatcher trellis the piper and the piper inmarry the thatcher then the piper is laudable. If something banish the cyndy then the cyndy inmarry the piper. The piper trellis the piper.", "logic": "\nTrellis(cyndy, thatcher)\nTrellis(cyndy, piper)\nInmarry(cyndy, piper)\nLugubrious(cyndy)\nLogistic(cyndy)\nBanish(cyndy, thatcher)\nBanish(cyndy, piper)\nInmarry(thatcher, cyndy)\nLugubrious(thatcher)\nObvious(thatcher)\nLaudable(thatcher)\nInmarry(piper, thatcher)\nGranulose(piper)\nLaudable(piper)\nBanish(piper, thatcher)\nforall x (Trellis(x, cyndy) and Obvious(x) -> Trellis(x, piper))\nforall x (Granulose(x) and Lugubrious(x) -> Banish(x, cyndy))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Granulose(x))\nforall x (Banish(x, piper) -> Laudable(x))\nTrellis(thatcher, piper) and Inmarry(piper, thatcher) -> Laudable(piper)\nforall x (Banish(x, cyndy) -> Inmarry(cyndy, piper))\n\nTrellis(piper, piper)\n\nforall x (Trellis(x, cyndy) and Obvious(x) -> Trellis(x, piper)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The westbrook tidy the prudi. The westbrook tidy the winonah. The westbrook sloganeer the winonah. The westbrook is single. The westbrook is unfrozen. The westbrook spam the prudi. The westbrook spam the winonah. The prudi sloganeer the westbrook. The prudi is single. The prudi is perfervid. The prudi is clownlike. The winonah sloganeer the prudi. The winonah is gaussian. The winonah is clownlike. The winonah spam the prudi. If something tidy the westbrook and it is perfervid then it tidy the winonah. If something is gaussian and single then it spam the westbrook. If something is clownlike then it is gaussian. If something spam the winonah then it is clownlike. If the prudi tidy the winonah and the winonah sloganeer the prudi then the winonah is clownlike. If something spam the westbrook then the westbrook sloganeer the winonah. The prudi does not chase the winonah.", "logic": "\nTidy(westbrook, prudi)\nTidy(westbrook, winonah)\nSloganeer(westbrook, winonah)\nSingle(westbrook)\nUnfrozen(westbrook)\nSpam(westbrook, prudi)\nSpam(westbrook, winonah)\nSloganeer(prudi, westbrook)\nSingle(prudi)\nPerfervid(prudi)\nClownlike(prudi)\nSloganeer(winonah, prudi)\nGaussian(winonah)\nClownlike(winonah)\nSpam(winonah, prudi)\nforall x (Tidy(x, westbrook) and Perfervid(x) -> Tidy(x, winonah))\nforall x (Gaussian(x) and Single(x) -> Spam(x, westbrook))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) -> Gaussian(x))\nforall x (Spam(x, winonah) -> Clownlike(x))\nTidy(prudi, winonah) and Sloganeer(winonah, prudi) -> Clownlike(winonah)\nforall x (Spam(x, westbrook) -> Sloganeer(westbrook, winonah))\n\nnot Tidy(prudi, winonah)\n\nforall x (Tidy(x, westbrook) and Perfervid(x) -> Tidy(x, winonah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The amandi team the rodrique. The amandi team the alameda. The amandi crinkle the alameda. The amandi is pouring. The amandi is gyroscopic. The amandi engulf the rodrique. The amandi engulf the alameda. The rodrique crinkle the amandi. The rodrique is pouring. The rodrique is stalwart. The rodrique is several. The alameda crinkle the rodrique. The alameda is peregrine. The alameda is several. The alameda engulf the rodrique. If something team the amandi and it is stalwart then it team the alameda. If something is peregrine and pouring then it engulf the amandi. If something is several then it is peregrine. If something engulf the alameda then it is several. If the rodrique team the alameda and the alameda crinkle the rodrique then the alameda is several. If something engulf the amandi then the amandi crinkle the alameda. The amandi crinkle the amandi.", "logic": "\nTeam(amandi, rodrique)\nTeam(amandi, alameda)\nCrinkle(amandi, alameda)\nPouring(amandi)\nGyroscopic(amandi)\nEngulf(amandi, rodrique)\nEngulf(amandi, alameda)\nCrinkle(rodrique, amandi)\nPouring(rodrique)\nStalwart(rodrique)\nSeveral(rodrique)\nCrinkle(alameda, rodrique)\nPeregrine(alameda)\nSeveral(alameda)\nEngulf(alameda, rodrique)\nforall x (Team(x, amandi) and Stalwart(x) -> Team(x, alameda))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) and Pouring(x) -> Engulf(x, amandi))\nforall x (Several(x) -> Peregrine(x))\nforall x (Engulf(x, alameda) -> Several(x))\nTeam(rodrique, alameda) and Crinkle(alameda, rodrique) -> Several(alameda)\nforall x (Engulf(x, amandi) -> Crinkle(amandi, alameda))\n\nCrinkle(amandi, amandi)\n\nCrinkle(amandi, amandi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The natalya disgust the zedekiah. The natalya disgust the dionne. The natalya nett the dionne. The natalya is oleophilic. The natalya is doglike. The natalya saturate the zedekiah. The natalya saturate the dionne. The zedekiah nett the natalya. The zedekiah is oleophilic. The zedekiah is systolic. The zedekiah is vascular. The dionne nett the zedekiah. The dionne is chimeral. The dionne is vascular. The dionne saturate the zedekiah. If something disgust the natalya and it is systolic then it disgust the dionne. If something is chimeral and oleophilic then it saturate the natalya. If something is vascular then it is chimeral. If something saturate the dionne then it is vascular. If the zedekiah disgust the dionne and the dionne nett the zedekiah then the dionne is vascular. If something saturate the natalya then the natalya nett the dionne. The zedekiah does not chase the zedekiah.", "logic": "\nDisgust(natalya, zedekiah)\nDisgust(natalya, dionne)\nNett(natalya, dionne)\nOleophilic(natalya)\nDoglike(natalya)\nSaturate(natalya, zedekiah)\nSaturate(natalya, dionne)\nNett(zedekiah, natalya)\nOleophilic(zedekiah)\nSystolic(zedekiah)\nVascular(zedekiah)\nNett(dionne, zedekiah)\nChimeral(dionne)\nVascular(dionne)\nSaturate(dionne, zedekiah)\nforall x (Disgust(x, natalya) and Systolic(x) -> Disgust(x, dionne))\nforall x (Chimeral(x) and Oleophilic(x) -> Saturate(x, natalya))\nforall x (Vascular(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nforall x (Saturate(x, dionne) -> Vascular(x))\nDisgust(zedekiah, dionne) and Nett(dionne, zedekiah) -> Vascular(dionne)\nforall x (Saturate(x, natalya) -> Nett(natalya, dionne))\n\nnot Disgust(zedekiah, zedekiah)\n\nnot Disgust(zedekiah, zedekiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The gino versify the elysia. The gino versify the phoebe. The gino verdigris the phoebe. The gino is impulsive. The gino is thriving. The gino convect the elysia. The gino convect the phoebe. The elysia verdigris the gino. The elysia is impulsive. The elysia is degressive. The elysia is inveterate. The phoebe verdigris the elysia. The phoebe is unmelted. The phoebe is inveterate. The phoebe convect the elysia. If something versify the gino and it is degressive then it versify the phoebe. If something is unmelted and impulsive then it convect the gino. If something is inveterate then it is unmelted. If something convect the phoebe then it is inveterate. If the elysia versify the phoebe and the phoebe verdigris the elysia then the phoebe is inveterate. If something convect the gino then the gino verdigris the phoebe. The phoebe versify the gino.", "logic": "\nVersify(gino, elysia)\nVersify(gino, phoebe)\nVerdigris(gino, phoebe)\nImpulsive(gino)\nThriving(gino)\nConvect(gino, elysia)\nConvect(gino, phoebe)\nVerdigris(elysia, gino)\nImpulsive(elysia)\nDegressive(elysia)\nInveterate(elysia)\nVerdigris(phoebe, elysia)\nUnmelted(phoebe)\nInveterate(phoebe)\nConvect(phoebe, elysia)\nforall x (Versify(x, gino) and Degressive(x) -> Versify(x, phoebe))\nforall x (Unmelted(x) and Impulsive(x) -> Convect(x, gino))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Convect(x, phoebe) -> Inveterate(x))\nVersify(elysia, phoebe) and Verdigris(phoebe, elysia) -> Inveterate(phoebe)\nforall x (Convect(x, gino) -> Verdigris(gino, phoebe))\n\nVersify(phoebe, gino)\n\nVersify(phoebe, gino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The horace miscreate the marv. The horace miscreate the donal. The horace curtail the donal. The horace is diluvian. The horace is meaning. The horace inscribe the marv. The horace inscribe the donal. The marv curtail the horace. The marv is diluvian. The marv is dantesque. The marv is regulated. The donal curtail the marv. The donal is endozoan. The donal is regulated. The donal inscribe the marv. If something miscreate the horace and it is dantesque then it miscreate the donal. If something is endozoan and diluvian then it inscribe the horace. If something is regulated then it is endozoan. If something inscribe the donal then it is regulated. If the marv miscreate the donal and the donal curtail the marv then the donal is regulated. If something inscribe the horace then the horace curtail the donal. The marv does not chase the horace.", "logic": "\nMiscreate(horace, marv)\nMiscreate(horace, donal)\nCurtail(horace, donal)\nDiluvian(horace)\nMeaning(horace)\nInscribe(horace, marv)\nInscribe(horace, donal)\nCurtail(marv, horace)\nDiluvian(marv)\nDantesque(marv)\nRegulated(marv)\nCurtail(donal, marv)\nEndozoan(donal)\nRegulated(donal)\nInscribe(donal, marv)\nforall x (Miscreate(x, horace) and Dantesque(x) -> Miscreate(x, donal))\nforall x (Endozoan(x) and Diluvian(x) -> Inscribe(x, horace))\nforall x (Regulated(x) -> Endozoan(x))\nforall x (Inscribe(x, donal) -> Regulated(x))\nMiscreate(marv, donal) and Curtail(donal, marv) -> Regulated(donal)\nforall x (Inscribe(x, horace) -> Curtail(horace, donal))\n\nnot Miscreate(marv, horace)\n\nnot Miscreate(marv, horace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The merril eternise the caryl. The merril eternise the gardner. The merril grapple the gardner. The merril is glace. The merril is biparous. The merril frock the caryl. The merril frock the gardner. The caryl grapple the merril. The caryl is glace. The caryl is fancy. The caryl is birken. The gardner grapple the caryl. The gardner is busy. The gardner is birken. The gardner frock the caryl. If something eternise the merril and it is fancy then it eternise the gardner. If something is busy and glace then it frock the merril. If something is birken then it is busy. If something frock the gardner then it is birken. If the caryl eternise the gardner and the gardner grapple the caryl then the gardner is birken. If something frock the merril then the merril grapple the gardner. The gardner is fancy.", "logic": "\nEternise(merril, caryl)\nEternise(merril, gardner)\nGrapple(merril, gardner)\nGlace(merril)\nBiparous(merril)\nFrock(merril, caryl)\nFrock(merril, gardner)\nGrapple(caryl, merril)\nGlace(caryl)\nFancy(caryl)\nBirken(caryl)\nGrapple(gardner, caryl)\nBusy(gardner)\nBirken(gardner)\nFrock(gardner, caryl)\nforall x (Eternise(x, merril) and Fancy(x) -> Eternise(x, gardner))\nforall x (Busy(x) and Glace(x) -> Frock(x, merril))\nforall x (Birken(x) -> Busy(x))\nforall x (Frock(x, gardner) -> Birken(x))\nEternise(caryl, gardner) and Grapple(gardner, caryl) -> Birken(gardner)\nforall x (Frock(x, merril) -> Grapple(merril, gardner))\n\nFancy(gardner)\n\nFancy(gardner) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Marcos is chimerical. Marcos is dwindling. Justis is golden. Justis is overstrung. Justis is dwindling. Justis is goaded. Justis is occipital. Samuel is golden. Samuel is bestial. Britte is golden. Britte is overstrung. Britte is chimerical. Britte is dwindling. Britte is goaded. Britte is bestial. Britte is occipital. If someone is dwindling then they are bestial. Blue people are overstrung. If someone is chimerical and overstrung then they are occipital. Round, occipital people are overstrung. All bestial people are goaded. Smart, dwindling people are overstrung. Britte is dwindling.", "logic": "\nChimerical(marcos)\nDwindling(marcos)\nGolden(justis)\nOverstrung(justis)\nDwindling(justis)\nGoaded(justis)\nOccipital(justis)\nGolden(samuel)\nBestial(samuel)\nGolden(britte)\nOverstrung(britte)\nChimerical(britte)\nDwindling(britte)\nGoaded(britte)\nBestial(britte)\nOccipital(britte)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> Bestial(x))\nforall x (Golden(x) -> Overstrung(x))\nforall x (Chimerical(x) and Overstrung(x) -> Occipital(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Occipital(x) -> Overstrung(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Goaded(x))\nforall x (Goaded(x) and Dwindling(x) -> Overstrung(x))\n\nDwindling(britte)\n\ntherefore Dwindling(britte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Ange is intolerant. Ange is uremic. Abbi is formless. Abbi is neat. Abbi is uremic. Abbi is newborn. Abbi is riotous. Stanfield is formless. Stanfield is grasping. Deena is formless. Deena is neat. Deena is intolerant. Deena is uremic. Deena is newborn. Deena is grasping. Deena is riotous. If someone is uremic then they are grasping. Blue people are neat. If someone is intolerant and neat then they are riotous. Round, riotous people are neat. All grasping people are newborn. Smart, uremic people are neat. Stanfield is not grasping.", "logic": "\nIntolerant(ange)\nUremic(ange)\nFormless(abbi)\nNeat(abbi)\nUremic(abbi)\nNewborn(abbi)\nRiotous(abbi)\nFormless(stanfield)\nGrasping(stanfield)\nFormless(deena)\nNeat(deena)\nIntolerant(deena)\nUremic(deena)\nNewborn(deena)\nGrasping(deena)\nRiotous(deena)\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Grasping(x))\nforall x (Formless(x) -> Neat(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) and Neat(x) -> Riotous(x))\nforall x (Uremic(x) and Riotous(x) -> Neat(x))\nforall x (Grasping(x) -> Newborn(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) and Uremic(x) -> Neat(x))\n\nnot Grasping(stanfield)\n\ntherefore Grasping(stanfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Sallyanne is repeatable. Sallyanne is censorial. Tremain is candescent. Tremain is nonspatial. Tremain is censorial. Tremain is solar. Tremain is cisalpine. Cleveland is candescent. Cleveland is sallow. Deloris is candescent. Deloris is nonspatial. Deloris is repeatable. Deloris is censorial. Deloris is solar. Deloris is sallow. Deloris is cisalpine. If someone is censorial then they are sallow. Blue people are nonspatial. If someone is repeatable and nonspatial then they are cisalpine. Round, cisalpine people are nonspatial. All sallow people are solar. Smart, censorial people are nonspatial. Cleveland is nonspatial.", "logic": "\nRepeatable(sallyanne)\nCensorial(sallyanne)\nCandescent(tremain)\nNonspatial(tremain)\nCensorial(tremain)\nSolar(tremain)\nCisalpine(tremain)\nCandescent(cleveland)\nSallow(cleveland)\nCandescent(deloris)\nNonspatial(deloris)\nRepeatable(deloris)\nCensorial(deloris)\nSolar(deloris)\nSallow(deloris)\nCisalpine(deloris)\nforall x (Censorial(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Candescent(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) and Nonspatial(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nforall x (Censorial(x) and Cisalpine(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Sallow(x) -> Solar(x))\nforall x (Solar(x) and Censorial(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\n\nNonspatial(cleveland)\n\nCandescent(cleveland) and forall x (Candescent(x) -> Nonspatial(x)) -> therefore Nonspatial(cleveland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Randene is nonpolar. Randene is mirthless. Morley is brumal. Morley is arced. Morley is mirthless. Morley is israeli. Morley is pauline. Gerhardt is brumal. Gerhardt is nisi. Katti is brumal. Katti is arced. Katti is nonpolar. Katti is mirthless. Katti is israeli. Katti is nisi. Katti is pauline. If someone is mirthless then they are nisi. Blue people are arced. If someone is nonpolar and arced then they are pauline. Round, pauline people are arced. All nisi people are israeli. Smart, mirthless people are arced. Gerhardt is not arced.", "logic": "\nNonpolar(randene)\nMirthless(randene)\nBrumal(morley)\nArced(morley)\nMirthless(morley)\nIsraeli(morley)\nPauline(morley)\nBrumal(gerhardt)\nNisi(gerhardt)\nBrumal(katti)\nArced(katti)\nNonpolar(katti)\nMirthless(katti)\nIsraeli(katti)\nNisi(katti)\nPauline(katti)\nforall x (Mirthless(x) -> Nisi(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Arced(x))\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) and Arced(x) -> Pauline(x))\nforall x (Mirthless(x) and Pauline(x) -> Arced(x))\nforall x (Nisi(x) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Israeli(x) and Mirthless(x) -> Arced(x))\n\nnot Arced(gerhardt)\n\nBrumal(gerhardt) and forall x (Brumal(x) -> Arced(x)) -> therefore Arced(gerhardt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Jessee is unsheathed. Jessee is camphoric. Buster is valid. Buster is autonomous. Buster is camphoric. Buster is jointed. Buster is luxuriant. Bianka is valid. Bianka is catechetic. Alice is valid. Alice is autonomous. Alice is unsheathed. Alice is camphoric. Alice is jointed. Alice is catechetic. Alice is luxuriant. If someone is camphoric then they are catechetic. Blue people are autonomous. If someone is unsheathed and autonomous then they are luxuriant. Round, luxuriant people are autonomous. All catechetic people are jointed. Smart, camphoric people are autonomous. Jessee is jointed.", "logic": "\nUnsheathed(jessee)\nCamphoric(jessee)\nValid(buster)\nAutonomous(buster)\nCamphoric(buster)\nJointed(buster)\nLuxuriant(buster)\nValid(bianka)\nCatechetic(bianka)\nValid(alice)\nAutonomous(alice)\nUnsheathed(alice)\nCamphoric(alice)\nJointed(alice)\nCatechetic(alice)\nLuxuriant(alice)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Catechetic(x))\nforall x (Valid(x) -> Autonomous(x))\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) and Autonomous(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) and Luxuriant(x) -> Autonomous(x))\nforall x (Catechetic(x) -> Jointed(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) and Camphoric(x) -> Autonomous(x))\n\nJointed(jessee)\n\nCamphoric(jessee) and forall x (Camphoric(x) -> Catechetic(x)) -> therefore Catechetic(jessee) Catechetic(jessee) and forall x (Catechetic(x) -> Jointed(x)) -> therefore Jointed(jessee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Fritz is phallic. Fritz is pinioned. Melisent is anguished. Melisent is adventive. Melisent is pinioned. Melisent is unsuited. Melisent is infective. Jerry is anguished. Jerry is edacious. Kirsteni is anguished. Kirsteni is adventive. Kirsteni is phallic. Kirsteni is pinioned. Kirsteni is unsuited. Kirsteni is edacious. Kirsteni is infective. If someone is pinioned then they are edacious. Blue people are adventive. If someone is phallic and adventive then they are infective. Round, infective people are adventive. All edacious people are unsuited. Smart, pinioned people are adventive. Fritz is not unsuited.", "logic": "\nPhallic(fritz)\nPinioned(fritz)\nAnguished(melisent)\nAdventive(melisent)\nPinioned(melisent)\nUnsuited(melisent)\nInfective(melisent)\nAnguished(jerry)\nEdacious(jerry)\nAnguished(kirsteni)\nAdventive(kirsteni)\nPhallic(kirsteni)\nPinioned(kirsteni)\nUnsuited(kirsteni)\nEdacious(kirsteni)\nInfective(kirsteni)\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Edacious(x))\nforall x (Anguished(x) -> Adventive(x))\nforall x (Phallic(x) and Adventive(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) and Infective(x) -> Adventive(x))\nforall x (Edacious(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Pinioned(x) -> Adventive(x))\n\nnot Unsuited(fritz)\n\nPinioned(fritz) and forall x (Pinioned(x) -> Edacious(x)) -> therefore Edacious(fritz) Edacious(fritz) and forall x (Edacious(x) -> Unsuited(x)) -> therefore Unsuited(fritz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Dorine is hemolytic. Dorine is strapping. Yelena is errorless. Yelena is reversive. Yelena is strapping. Yelena is rotatable. Yelena is biconcave. Tally is errorless. Tally is semiformal. Langston is errorless. Langston is reversive. Langston is hemolytic. Langston is strapping. Langston is rotatable. Langston is semiformal. Langston is biconcave. If someone is strapping then they are semiformal. Blue people are reversive. If someone is hemolytic and reversive then they are biconcave. Round, biconcave people are reversive. All semiformal people are rotatable. Smart, strapping people are reversive. Dorine is reversive.", "logic": "\nHemolytic(dorine)\nStrapping(dorine)\nErrorless(yelena)\nReversive(yelena)\nStrapping(yelena)\nRotatable(yelena)\nBiconcave(yelena)\nErrorless(tally)\nSemiformal(tally)\nErrorless(langston)\nReversive(langston)\nHemolytic(langston)\nStrapping(langston)\nRotatable(langston)\nSemiformal(langston)\nBiconcave(langston)\nforall x (Strapping(x) -> Semiformal(x))\nforall x (Errorless(x) -> Reversive(x))\nforall x (Hemolytic(x) and Reversive(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nforall x (Strapping(x) and Biconcave(x) -> Reversive(x))\nforall x (Semiformal(x) -> Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and Strapping(x) -> Reversive(x))\n\nReversive(dorine)\n\nStrapping(dorine) and forall x (Strapping(x) -> Semiformal(x)) -> therefore Semiformal(dorine) Semiformal(dorine) and forall x (Semiformal(x) -> Rotatable(x)) -> therefore Rotatable(dorine) Rotatable(dorine) and Strapping(dorine) and forall x (Rotatable(x) and Strapping(x) -> Reversive(x)) -> therefore Reversive(dorine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Jobie is floccose. Jobie is corking. Caroline is colonial. Caroline is planetary. Caroline is corking. Caroline is ethiopian. Caroline is bordered. Glynda is colonial. Glynda is cosmogonic. Hilarie is colonial. Hilarie is planetary. Hilarie is floccose. Hilarie is corking. Hilarie is ethiopian. Hilarie is cosmogonic. Hilarie is bordered. If someone is corking then they are cosmogonic. Blue people are planetary. If someone is floccose and planetary then they are bordered. Round, bordered people are planetary. All cosmogonic people are ethiopian. Smart, corking people are planetary. Jobie is not planetary.", "logic": "\nFloccose(jobie)\nCorking(jobie)\nColonial(caroline)\nPlanetary(caroline)\nCorking(caroline)\nEthiopian(caroline)\nBordered(caroline)\nColonial(glynda)\nCosmogonic(glynda)\nColonial(hilarie)\nPlanetary(hilarie)\nFloccose(hilarie)\nCorking(hilarie)\nEthiopian(hilarie)\nCosmogonic(hilarie)\nBordered(hilarie)\nforall x (Corking(x) -> Cosmogonic(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Planetary(x))\nforall x (Floccose(x) and Planetary(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Corking(x) and Bordered(x) -> Planetary(x))\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) and Corking(x) -> Planetary(x))\n\nnot Planetary(jobie)\n\nCorking(jobie) and forall x (Corking(x) -> Cosmogonic(x)) -> therefore Cosmogonic(jobie) Cosmogonic(jobie) and forall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Ethiopian(x)) -> therefore Ethiopian(jobie) Ethiopian(jobie) and Corking(jobie) and forall x (Ethiopian(x) and Corking(x) -> Planetary(x)) -> therefore Planetary(jobie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Rozanna is acute. Rozanna is apiarian. Davoud is ramose. Davoud is rustic. Davoud is apiarian. Davoud is infeasible. Davoud is unuseable. Elizabet is ramose. Elizabet is frothing. Tine is ramose. Tine is rustic. Tine is acute. Tine is apiarian. Tine is infeasible. Tine is frothing. Tine is unuseable. If someone is apiarian then they are frothing. Blue people are rustic. If someone is acute and rustic then they are unuseable. Round, unuseable people are rustic. All frothing people are infeasible. Smart, apiarian people are rustic. Elizabet is not unuseable.", "logic": "\nAcute(rozanna)\nApiarian(rozanna)\nRamose(davoud)\nRustic(davoud)\nApiarian(davoud)\nInfeasible(davoud)\nUnuseable(davoud)\nRamose(elizabet)\nFrothing(elizabet)\nRamose(tine)\nRustic(tine)\nAcute(tine)\nApiarian(tine)\nInfeasible(tine)\nFrothing(tine)\nUnuseable(tine)\nforall x (Apiarian(x) -> Frothing(x))\nforall x (Ramose(x) -> Rustic(x))\nforall x (Acute(x) and Rustic(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) and Unuseable(x) -> Rustic(x))\nforall x (Frothing(x) -> Infeasible(x))\nforall x (Infeasible(x) and Apiarian(x) -> Rustic(x))\n\nnot Unuseable(elizabet)\n\nforall x (Acute(x) and Rustic(x) -> Unuseable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Delinda is reportable. Delinda is treble. Carlynne is mastered. Carlynne is octangular. Carlynne is treble. Carlynne is divine. Carlynne is xlii. Mina is mastered. Mina is cognizant. Kitty is mastered. Kitty is octangular. Kitty is reportable. Kitty is treble. Kitty is divine. Kitty is cognizant. Kitty is xlii. If someone is treble then they are cognizant. Blue people are octangular. If someone is reportable and octangular then they are xlii. Round, xlii people are octangular. All cognizant people are divine. Smart, treble people are octangular. Carlynne is reportable.", "logic": "\nReportable(delinda)\nTreble(delinda)\nMastered(carlynne)\nOctangular(carlynne)\nTreble(carlynne)\nDivine(carlynne)\nXlii(carlynne)\nMastered(mina)\nCognizant(mina)\nMastered(kitty)\nOctangular(kitty)\nReportable(kitty)\nTreble(kitty)\nDivine(kitty)\nCognizant(kitty)\nXlii(kitty)\nforall x (Treble(x) -> Cognizant(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Octangular(x))\nforall x (Reportable(x) and Octangular(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Treble(x) and Xlii(x) -> Octangular(x))\nforall x (Cognizant(x) -> Divine(x))\nforall x (Divine(x) and Treble(x) -> Octangular(x))\n\nReportable(carlynne)\n\nReportable(carlynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Rheta is funded. Rheta is culinary. Georgetta is addable. Georgetta is married. Georgetta is culinary. Georgetta is equivocal. Georgetta is dorian. Katharyn is addable. Katharyn is willful. Joe is addable. Joe is married. Joe is funded. Joe is culinary. Joe is equivocal. Joe is willful. Joe is dorian. If someone is culinary then they are willful. Blue people are married. If someone is funded and married then they are dorian. Round, dorian people are married. All willful people are equivocal. Smart, culinary people are married. Katharyn is not culinary.", "logic": "\nFunded(rheta)\nCulinary(rheta)\nAddable(georgetta)\nMarried(georgetta)\nCulinary(georgetta)\nEquivocal(georgetta)\nDorian(georgetta)\nAddable(katharyn)\nWillful(katharyn)\nAddable(joe)\nMarried(joe)\nFunded(joe)\nCulinary(joe)\nEquivocal(joe)\nWillful(joe)\nDorian(joe)\nforall x (Culinary(x) -> Willful(x))\nforall x (Addable(x) -> Married(x))\nforall x (Funded(x) and Married(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Culinary(x) and Dorian(x) -> Married(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) -> Equivocal(x))\nforall x (Equivocal(x) and Culinary(x) -> Married(x))\n\nnot Culinary(katharyn)\n\nnot Culinary(katharyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Collin is some. Collin is fruticose. Thayne is likely. Thayne is flat. Thayne is fruticose. Thayne is camphoric. Thayne is completing. Zsazsa is likely. Zsazsa is bolshy. Ingram is likely. Ingram is flat. Ingram is some. Ingram is fruticose. Ingram is camphoric. Ingram is bolshy. Ingram is completing. If someone is fruticose then they are bolshy. Blue people are flat. If someone is some and flat then they are completing. Round, completing people are flat. All bolshy people are camphoric. Smart, fruticose people are flat. Zsazsa is some.", "logic": "\nSome(collin)\nFruticose(collin)\nLikely(thayne)\nFlat(thayne)\nFruticose(thayne)\nCamphoric(thayne)\nCompleting(thayne)\nLikely(zsazsa)\nBolshy(zsazsa)\nLikely(ingram)\nFlat(ingram)\nSome(ingram)\nFruticose(ingram)\nCamphoric(ingram)\nBolshy(ingram)\nCompleting(ingram)\nforall x (Fruticose(x) -> Bolshy(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Flat(x))\nforall x (Some(x) and Flat(x) -> Completing(x))\nforall x (Fruticose(x) and Completing(x) -> Flat(x))\nforall x (Bolshy(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) and Fruticose(x) -> Flat(x))\n\nSome(zsazsa)\n\nSome(zsazsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Hobart is saurian. Hobart is juridical. Hobart is opening. Hobart is wasteful. Hobart is erose. Hobart is belittling. Merilee is saurian. Merilee is juridical. Merilee is wasteful. Merilee is erose. Merilee is belittling. Bonnie is voltarian. Bonnie is opening. Bonnie is belittling. Celinka is voltarian. Celinka is opening. All voltarian, belittling things are saurian. If something is erose then it is opening. All wasteful things are voltarian. If something is wasteful then it is erose. If something is belittling and opening then it is wasteful. Red things are belittling. Hobart is juridical.", "logic": "\nSaurian(hobart)\nJuridical(hobart)\nOpening(hobart)\nWasteful(hobart)\nErose(hobart)\nBelittling(hobart)\nSaurian(merilee)\nJuridical(merilee)\nWasteful(merilee)\nErose(merilee)\nBelittling(merilee)\nVoltarian(bonnie)\nOpening(bonnie)\nBelittling(bonnie)\nVoltarian(celinka)\nOpening(celinka)\nforall x (Voltarian(x) and Belittling(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) -> Opening(x))\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Erose(x))\nforall x (Belittling(x) and Opening(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Opening(x) -> Belittling(x))\n\nJuridical(hobart)\n\ntherefore Juridical(hobart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Noah is filled. Noah is indexless. Noah is engorged. Noah is jerkwater. Noah is butcherly. Noah is rutty. Ivonne is filled. Ivonne is indexless. Ivonne is jerkwater. Ivonne is butcherly. Ivonne is rutty. Mira is bashful. Mira is engorged. Mira is rutty. Agustin is bashful. Agustin is engorged. All bashful, rutty things are filled. If something is butcherly then it is engorged. All jerkwater things are bashful. If something is jerkwater then it is butcherly. If something is rutty and engorged then it is jerkwater. Red things are rutty. Noah is not filled.", "logic": "\nFilled(noah)\nIndexless(noah)\nEngorged(noah)\nJerkwater(noah)\nButcherly(noah)\nRutty(noah)\nFilled(ivonne)\nIndexless(ivonne)\nJerkwater(ivonne)\nButcherly(ivonne)\nRutty(ivonne)\nBashful(mira)\nEngorged(mira)\nRutty(mira)\nBashful(agustin)\nEngorged(agustin)\nforall x (Bashful(x) and Rutty(x) -> Filled(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Engorged(x))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Rutty(x) and Engorged(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Engorged(x) -> Rutty(x))\n\nnot Filled(noah)\n\ntherefore Filled(noah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Leelah is continued. Leelah is workable. Leelah is modular. Leelah is antiseptic. Leelah is sourish. Leelah is bacchic. Evonne is continued. Evonne is workable. Evonne is antiseptic. Evonne is sourish. Evonne is bacchic. Aileen is hymenal. Aileen is modular. Aileen is bacchic. Arda is hymenal. Arda is modular. All hymenal, bacchic things are continued. If something is sourish then it is modular. All antiseptic things are hymenal. If something is antiseptic then it is sourish. If something is bacchic and modular then it is antiseptic. Red things are bacchic. Arda is bacchic.", "logic": "\nContinued(leelah)\nWorkable(leelah)\nModular(leelah)\nAntiseptic(leelah)\nSourish(leelah)\nBacchic(leelah)\nContinued(evonne)\nWorkable(evonne)\nAntiseptic(evonne)\nSourish(evonne)\nBacchic(evonne)\nHymenal(aileen)\nModular(aileen)\nBacchic(aileen)\nHymenal(arda)\nModular(arda)\nforall x (Hymenal(x) and Bacchic(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) -> Hymenal(x))\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) -> Sourish(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Modular(x) -> Antiseptic(x))\nforall x (Modular(x) -> Bacchic(x))\n\nBacchic(arda)\n\nModular(arda) and forall x (Modular(x) -> Bacchic(x)) -> therefore Bacchic(arda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Clem is secretive. Clem is aboulic. Clem is basophilic. Clem is rhetorical. Clem is mousey. Clem is warty. Merle is secretive. Merle is aboulic. Merle is rhetorical. Merle is mousey. Merle is warty. Sidoney is statuary. Sidoney is basophilic. Sidoney is warty. Gideon is statuary. Gideon is basophilic. All statuary, warty things are secretive. If something is mousey then it is basophilic. All rhetorical things are statuary. If something is rhetorical then it is mousey. If something is warty and basophilic then it is rhetorical. Red things are warty. Gideon is not warty.", "logic": "\nSecretive(clem)\nAboulic(clem)\nBasophilic(clem)\nRhetorical(clem)\nMousey(clem)\nWarty(clem)\nSecretive(merle)\nAboulic(merle)\nRhetorical(merle)\nMousey(merle)\nWarty(merle)\nStatuary(sidoney)\nBasophilic(sidoney)\nWarty(sidoney)\nStatuary(gideon)\nBasophilic(gideon)\nforall x (Statuary(x) and Warty(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Basophilic(x))\nforall x (Rhetorical(x) -> Statuary(x))\nforall x (Rhetorical(x) -> Mousey(x))\nforall x (Warty(x) and Basophilic(x) -> Rhetorical(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) -> Warty(x))\n\nnot Warty(gideon)\n\nBasophilic(gideon) and forall x (Basophilic(x) -> Warty(x)) -> therefore Warty(gideon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Esmeralda is diurnal. Esmeralda is metatarsal. Esmeralda is debonaire. Esmeralda is iatrogenic. Esmeralda is brusk. Esmeralda is exogenic. Kiersten is diurnal. Kiersten is metatarsal. Kiersten is iatrogenic. Kiersten is brusk. Kiersten is exogenic. Bernita is calamitous. Bernita is debonaire. Bernita is exogenic. Lem is calamitous. Lem is debonaire. All calamitous, exogenic things are diurnal. If something is brusk then it is debonaire. All iatrogenic things are calamitous. If something is iatrogenic then it is brusk. If something is exogenic and debonaire then it is iatrogenic. Red things are exogenic. Bernita is brusk.", "logic": "\nDiurnal(esmeralda)\nMetatarsal(esmeralda)\nDebonaire(esmeralda)\nIatrogenic(esmeralda)\nBrusk(esmeralda)\nExogenic(esmeralda)\nDiurnal(kiersten)\nMetatarsal(kiersten)\nIatrogenic(kiersten)\nBrusk(kiersten)\nExogenic(kiersten)\nCalamitous(bernita)\nDebonaire(bernita)\nExogenic(bernita)\nCalamitous(lem)\nDebonaire(lem)\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Exogenic(x) -> Diurnal(x))\nforall x (Brusk(x) -> Debonaire(x))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Calamitous(x))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Brusk(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Debonaire(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nforall x (Debonaire(x) -> Exogenic(x))\n\nBrusk(bernita)\n\nExogenic(bernita) and Debonaire(bernita) and forall x (Exogenic(x) and Debonaire(x) -> Iatrogenic(x)) -> therefore Iatrogenic(bernita) Iatrogenic(bernita) and forall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Brusk(x)) -> therefore Brusk(bernita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Gerti is faddish. Gerti is relevant. Gerti is obvious. Gerti is sprouted. Gerti is becoming. Gerti is caudated. Griselda is faddish. Griselda is relevant. Griselda is sprouted. Griselda is becoming. Griselda is caudated. Cheri is bronze. Cheri is obvious. Cheri is caudated. Koralle is bronze. Koralle is obvious. All bronze, caudated things are faddish. If something is becoming then it is obvious. All sprouted things are bronze. If something is sprouted then it is becoming. If something is caudated and obvious then it is sprouted. Red things are caudated. Koralle is not sprouted.", "logic": "\nFaddish(gerti)\nRelevant(gerti)\nObvious(gerti)\nSprouted(gerti)\nBecoming(gerti)\nCaudated(gerti)\nFaddish(griselda)\nRelevant(griselda)\nSprouted(griselda)\nBecoming(griselda)\nCaudated(griselda)\nBronze(cheri)\nObvious(cheri)\nCaudated(cheri)\nBronze(koralle)\nObvious(koralle)\nforall x (Bronze(x) and Caudated(x) -> Faddish(x))\nforall x (Becoming(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Bronze(x))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Becoming(x))\nforall x (Caudated(x) and Obvious(x) -> Sprouted(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Caudated(x))\n\nnot Sprouted(koralle)\n\nObvious(koralle) and forall x (Obvious(x) -> Caudated(x)) -> therefore Caudated(koralle) Caudated(koralle) and Obvious(koralle) and forall x (Caudated(x) and Obvious(x) -> Sprouted(x)) -> therefore Sprouted(koralle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Janeen is ungual. Janeen is nonresiny. Janeen is barytic. Janeen is pursuant. Janeen is commanding. Janeen is pockmarked. Francisca is ungual. Francisca is nonresiny. Francisca is pursuant. Francisca is commanding. Francisca is pockmarked. Helaine is altricial. Helaine is barytic. Helaine is pockmarked. Shalne is altricial. Shalne is barytic. All altricial, pockmarked things are ungual. If something is commanding then it is barytic. All pursuant things are altricial. If something is pursuant then it is commanding. If something is pockmarked and barytic then it is pursuant. Red things are pockmarked. Shalne is commanding.", "logic": "\nUngual(janeen)\nNonresiny(janeen)\nBarytic(janeen)\nPursuant(janeen)\nCommanding(janeen)\nPockmarked(janeen)\nUngual(francisca)\nNonresiny(francisca)\nPursuant(francisca)\nCommanding(francisca)\nPockmarked(francisca)\nAltricial(helaine)\nBarytic(helaine)\nPockmarked(helaine)\nAltricial(shalne)\nBarytic(shalne)\nforall x (Altricial(x) and Pockmarked(x) -> Ungual(x))\nforall x (Commanding(x) -> Barytic(x))\nforall x (Pursuant(x) -> Altricial(x))\nforall x (Pursuant(x) -> Commanding(x))\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) and Barytic(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Barytic(x) -> Pockmarked(x))\n\nCommanding(shalne)\n\nBarytic(shalne) and forall x (Barytic(x) -> Pockmarked(x)) -> therefore Pockmarked(shalne) Pockmarked(shalne) and Barytic(shalne) and forall x (Pockmarked(x) and Barytic(x) -> Pursuant(x)) -> therefore Pursuant(shalne) Pursuant(shalne) and forall x (Pursuant(x) -> Commanding(x)) -> therefore Commanding(shalne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Cathlene is scraggly. Cathlene is narcotized. Cathlene is christless. Cathlene is gummed. Cathlene is destined. Cathlene is pelvic. Danica is scraggly. Danica is narcotized. Danica is gummed. Danica is destined. Danica is pelvic. Dosi is afeard. Dosi is christless. Dosi is pelvic. Darya is afeard. Darya is christless. All afeard, pelvic things are scraggly. If something is destined then it is christless. All gummed things are afeard. If something is gummed then it is destined. If something is pelvic and christless then it is gummed. Red things are pelvic. Darya is not destined.", "logic": "\nScraggly(cathlene)\nNarcotized(cathlene)\nChristless(cathlene)\nGummed(cathlene)\nDestined(cathlene)\nPelvic(cathlene)\nScraggly(danica)\nNarcotized(danica)\nGummed(danica)\nDestined(danica)\nPelvic(danica)\nAfeard(dosi)\nChristless(dosi)\nPelvic(dosi)\nAfeard(darya)\nChristless(darya)\nforall x (Afeard(x) and Pelvic(x) -> Scraggly(x))\nforall x (Destined(x) -> Christless(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Afeard(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) and Christless(x) -> Gummed(x))\nforall x (Christless(x) -> Pelvic(x))\n\nnot Destined(darya)\n\nChristless(darya) and forall x (Christless(x) -> Pelvic(x)) -> therefore Pelvic(darya) Pelvic(darya) and Christless(darya) and forall x (Pelvic(x) and Christless(x) -> Gummed(x)) -> therefore Gummed(darya) Gummed(darya) and forall x (Gummed(x) -> Destined(x)) -> therefore Destined(darya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Durant is oafish. Durant is noseless. Durant is disarming. Durant is ciliated. Durant is pigheaded. Durant is unbiassed. Victoria is oafish. Victoria is noseless. Victoria is ciliated. Victoria is pigheaded. Victoria is unbiassed. Weider is churchly. Weider is disarming. Weider is unbiassed. Horacio is churchly. Horacio is disarming. All churchly, unbiassed things are oafish. If something is pigheaded then it is disarming. All ciliated things are churchly. If something is ciliated then it is pigheaded. If something is unbiassed and disarming then it is ciliated. Red things are unbiassed. Weider is not noseless.", "logic": "\nOafish(durant)\nNoseless(durant)\nDisarming(durant)\nCiliated(durant)\nPigheaded(durant)\nUnbiassed(durant)\nOafish(victoria)\nNoseless(victoria)\nCiliated(victoria)\nPigheaded(victoria)\nUnbiassed(victoria)\nChurchly(weider)\nDisarming(weider)\nUnbiassed(weider)\nChurchly(horacio)\nDisarming(horacio)\nforall x (Churchly(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Oafish(x))\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Disarming(x))\nforall x (Ciliated(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Ciliated(x) -> Pigheaded(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Disarming(x) -> Ciliated(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\n\nnot Noseless(weider)\n\nnot Noseless(weider) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Ginevra is haploidic. Ginevra is incredible. Ginevra is elegiac. Ginevra is uncoerced. Ginevra is uncounted. Ginevra is uninviting. Elsy is haploidic. Elsy is incredible. Elsy is uncoerced. Elsy is uncounted. Elsy is uninviting. Duke is aerolitic. Duke is elegiac. Duke is uninviting. Hunt is aerolitic. Hunt is elegiac. All aerolitic, uninviting things are haploidic. If something is uncounted then it is elegiac. All uncoerced things are aerolitic. If something is uncoerced then it is uncounted. If something is uninviting and elegiac then it is uncoerced. Red things are uninviting. Hunt is incredible.", "logic": "\nHaploidic(ginevra)\nIncredible(ginevra)\nElegiac(ginevra)\nUncoerced(ginevra)\nUncounted(ginevra)\nUninviting(ginevra)\nHaploidic(elsy)\nIncredible(elsy)\nUncoerced(elsy)\nUncounted(elsy)\nUninviting(elsy)\nAerolitic(duke)\nElegiac(duke)\nUninviting(duke)\nAerolitic(hunt)\nElegiac(hunt)\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) and Uninviting(x) -> Haploidic(x))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Elegiac(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Aerolitic(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Uncounted(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Elegiac(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Elegiac(x) -> Uninviting(x))\n\nIncredible(hunt)\n\nIncredible(hunt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Vinita is carbuncled. Vinita is pulmonary. Wylma is astragalar. Wylma is pulmonary. Wylma is lipotropic. Wylma is choppy. Wylma is oleophilic. All pulmonary people are oleophilic. If Vinita is battered then Vinita is carbuncled. If Wylma is astragalar and Wylma is choppy then Wylma is lipotropic. Red people are oleophilic. If someone is pulmonary and battered then they are lipotropic. Red, carbuncled people are battered. If Vinita is astragalar and Vinita is choppy then Vinita is lipotropic. All pulmonary people are choppy. Wylma is pulmonary.", "logic": "\nCarbuncled(vinita)\nPulmonary(vinita)\nAstragalar(wylma)\nPulmonary(wylma)\nLipotropic(wylma)\nChoppy(wylma)\nOleophilic(wylma)\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) -> Oleophilic(x))\nBattered(vinita) -> Carbuncled(vinita)\nAstragalar(wylma) and Choppy(wylma) -> Lipotropic(wylma)\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Oleophilic(x))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Battered(x) -> Lipotropic(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) and Carbuncled(x) -> Battered(x))\nAstragalar(vinita) and Choppy(vinita) -> Lipotropic(vinita)\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) -> Choppy(x))\n\nPulmonary(wylma)\n\ntherefore Pulmonary(wylma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Binky is changeful. Binky is humongous. Rollins is rigged. Rollins is humongous. Rollins is magenta. Rollins is immense. Rollins is gratified. All humongous people are gratified. If Binky is unimpaired then Binky is changeful. If Rollins is rigged and Rollins is immense then Rollins is magenta. Red people are gratified. If someone is humongous and unimpaired then they are magenta. Red, changeful people are unimpaired. If Binky is rigged and Binky is immense then Binky is magenta. All humongous people are immense. Rollins is not rigged.", "logic": "\nChangeful(binky)\nHumongous(binky)\nRigged(rollins)\nHumongous(rollins)\nMagenta(rollins)\nImmense(rollins)\nGratified(rollins)\nforall x (Humongous(x) -> Gratified(x))\nUnimpaired(binky) -> Changeful(binky)\nRigged(rollins) and Immense(rollins) -> Magenta(rollins)\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Humongous(x) and Unimpaired(x) -> Magenta(x))\nforall x (Immense(x) and Changeful(x) -> Unimpaired(x))\nRigged(binky) and Immense(binky) -> Magenta(binky)\nforall x (Humongous(x) -> Immense(x))\n\nnot Rigged(rollins)\n\ntherefore Rigged(rollins)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Glyn is knightly. Glyn is fiendish. Ambrosius is hypodermic. Ambrosius is fiendish. Ambrosius is comose. Ambrosius is hugoesque. Ambrosius is lactating. All fiendish people are lactating. If Glyn is thoriated then Glyn is knightly. If Ambrosius is hypodermic and Ambrosius is hugoesque then Ambrosius is comose. Red people are lactating. If someone is fiendish and thoriated then they are comose. Red, knightly people are thoriated. If Glyn is hypodermic and Glyn is hugoesque then Glyn is comose. All fiendish people are hugoesque. Glyn is lactating.", "logic": "\nKnightly(glyn)\nFiendish(glyn)\nHypodermic(ambrosius)\nFiendish(ambrosius)\nComose(ambrosius)\nHugoesque(ambrosius)\nLactating(ambrosius)\nforall x (Fiendish(x) -> Lactating(x))\nThoriated(glyn) -> Knightly(glyn)\nHypodermic(ambrosius) and Hugoesque(ambrosius) -> Comose(ambrosius)\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Fiendish(x) and Thoriated(x) -> Comose(x))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) and Knightly(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nHypodermic(glyn) and Hugoesque(glyn) -> Comose(glyn)\nforall x (Fiendish(x) -> Hugoesque(x))\n\nLactating(glyn)\n\nFiendish(glyn) and forall x (Fiendish(x) -> Lactating(x)) -> therefore Lactating(glyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Guthrie is agrestic. Guthrie is exalted. Emelina is revertible. Emelina is exalted. Emelina is directed. Emelina is axillary. Emelina is seasoned. All exalted people are seasoned. If Guthrie is erythroid then Guthrie is agrestic. If Emelina is revertible and Emelina is axillary then Emelina is directed. Red people are seasoned. If someone is exalted and erythroid then they are directed. Red, agrestic people are erythroid. If Guthrie is revertible and Guthrie is axillary then Guthrie is directed. All exalted people are axillary. Guthrie is not seasoned.", "logic": "\nAgrestic(guthrie)\nExalted(guthrie)\nRevertible(emelina)\nExalted(emelina)\nDirected(emelina)\nAxillary(emelina)\nSeasoned(emelina)\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nErythroid(guthrie) -> Agrestic(guthrie)\nRevertible(emelina) and Axillary(emelina) -> Directed(emelina)\nforall x (Axillary(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) and Erythroid(x) -> Directed(x))\nforall x (Axillary(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Erythroid(x))\nRevertible(guthrie) and Axillary(guthrie) -> Directed(guthrie)\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Axillary(x))\n\nnot Seasoned(guthrie)\n\nExalted(guthrie) and forall x (Exalted(x) -> Seasoned(x)) -> therefore Seasoned(guthrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Anatoly is immovable. Anatoly is airsick. Alli is raiseable. Alli is airsick. Alli is vaporized. Alli is tactless. Alli is depraved. All airsick people are depraved. If Anatoly is fluky then Anatoly is immovable. If Alli is raiseable and Alli is tactless then Alli is vaporized. Red people are depraved. If someone is airsick and fluky then they are vaporized. Red, immovable people are fluky. If Anatoly is raiseable and Anatoly is tactless then Anatoly is vaporized. All airsick people are tactless. Anatoly is fluky.", "logic": "\nImmovable(anatoly)\nAirsick(anatoly)\nRaiseable(alli)\nAirsick(alli)\nVaporized(alli)\nTactless(alli)\nDepraved(alli)\nforall x (Airsick(x) -> Depraved(x))\nFluky(anatoly) -> Immovable(anatoly)\nRaiseable(alli) and Tactless(alli) -> Vaporized(alli)\nforall x (Tactless(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Airsick(x) and Fluky(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nforall x (Tactless(x) and Immovable(x) -> Fluky(x))\nRaiseable(anatoly) and Tactless(anatoly) -> Vaporized(anatoly)\nforall x (Airsick(x) -> Tactless(x))\n\nFluky(anatoly)\n\nAirsick(anatoly) and forall x (Airsick(x) -> Tactless(x)) -> therefore Tactless(anatoly) Tactless(anatoly) and Immovable(anatoly) and forall x (Tactless(x) and Immovable(x) -> Fluky(x)) -> therefore Fluky(anatoly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Joya is osseous. Joya is fawning. Uta is dipped. Uta is fawning. Uta is moderate. Uta is exulting. Uta is involute. All fawning people are involute. If Joya is ungrudging then Joya is osseous. If Uta is dipped and Uta is exulting then Uta is moderate. Red people are involute. If someone is fawning and ungrudging then they are moderate. Red, osseous people are ungrudging. If Joya is dipped and Joya is exulting then Joya is moderate. All fawning people are exulting. Joya is not ungrudging.", "logic": "\nOsseous(joya)\nFawning(joya)\nDipped(uta)\nFawning(uta)\nModerate(uta)\nExulting(uta)\nInvolute(uta)\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Involute(x))\nUngrudging(joya) -> Osseous(joya)\nDipped(uta) and Exulting(uta) -> Moderate(uta)\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Involute(x))\nforall x (Fawning(x) and Ungrudging(x) -> Moderate(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) and Osseous(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\nDipped(joya) and Exulting(joya) -> Moderate(joya)\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Exulting(x))\n\nnot Ungrudging(joya)\n\nFawning(joya) and forall x (Fawning(x) -> Exulting(x)) -> therefore Exulting(joya) Exulting(joya) and Osseous(joya) and forall x (Exulting(x) and Osseous(x) -> Ungrudging(x)) -> therefore Ungrudging(joya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Waneta is inept. Waneta is patronised. Orelia is piratical. Orelia is patronised. Orelia is agronomic. Orelia is hyaloid. Orelia is anticlinal. All patronised people are anticlinal. If Waneta is reliant then Waneta is inept. If Orelia is piratical and Orelia is hyaloid then Orelia is agronomic. Red people are anticlinal. If someone is patronised and reliant then they are agronomic. Red, inept people are reliant. If Waneta is piratical and Waneta is hyaloid then Waneta is agronomic. All patronised people are hyaloid. Waneta is agronomic.", "logic": "\nInept(waneta)\nPatronised(waneta)\nPiratical(orelia)\nPatronised(orelia)\nAgronomic(orelia)\nHyaloid(orelia)\nAnticlinal(orelia)\nforall x (Patronised(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nReliant(waneta) -> Inept(waneta)\nPiratical(orelia) and Hyaloid(orelia) -> Agronomic(orelia)\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nforall x (Patronised(x) and Reliant(x) -> Agronomic(x))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Inept(x) -> Reliant(x))\nPiratical(waneta) and Hyaloid(waneta) -> Agronomic(waneta)\nforall x (Patronised(x) -> Hyaloid(x))\n\nAgronomic(waneta)\n\nPatronised(waneta) and forall x (Patronised(x) -> Hyaloid(x)) -> therefore Hyaloid(waneta) Hyaloid(waneta) and Inept(waneta) and forall x (Hyaloid(x) and Inept(x) -> Reliant(x)) -> therefore Reliant(waneta) Patronised(waneta) and Reliant(waneta) and forall x (Patronised(x) and Reliant(x) -> Agronomic(x)) -> therefore Agronomic(waneta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Aurlie is amok. Aurlie is costive. Mavra is anisogamic. Mavra is costive. Mavra is svelte. Mavra is uncoerced. Mavra is rwandan. All costive people are rwandan. If Aurlie is dutiful then Aurlie is amok. If Mavra is anisogamic and Mavra is uncoerced then Mavra is svelte. Red people are rwandan. If someone is costive and dutiful then they are svelte. Red, amok people are dutiful. If Aurlie is anisogamic and Aurlie is uncoerced then Aurlie is svelte. All costive people are uncoerced. Aurlie is not svelte.", "logic": "\nAmok(aurlie)\nCostive(aurlie)\nAnisogamic(mavra)\nCostive(mavra)\nSvelte(mavra)\nUncoerced(mavra)\nRwandan(mavra)\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Rwandan(x))\nDutiful(aurlie) -> Amok(aurlie)\nAnisogamic(mavra) and Uncoerced(mavra) -> Svelte(mavra)\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> Rwandan(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) and Dutiful(x) -> Svelte(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) and Amok(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nAnisogamic(aurlie) and Uncoerced(aurlie) -> Svelte(aurlie)\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\n\nnot Svelte(aurlie)\n\nCostive(aurlie) and forall x (Costive(x) -> Uncoerced(x)) -> therefore Uncoerced(aurlie) Uncoerced(aurlie) and Amok(aurlie) and forall x (Uncoerced(x) and Amok(x) -> Dutiful(x)) -> therefore Dutiful(aurlie) Costive(aurlie) and Dutiful(aurlie) and forall x (Costive(x) and Dutiful(x) -> Svelte(x)) -> therefore Svelte(aurlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Brandy is caitiff. Brandy is oligarchic. Marthena is frangible. Marthena is oligarchic. Marthena is lxxxii. Marthena is believable. Marthena is botchy. All oligarchic people are botchy. If Brandy is disputable then Brandy is caitiff. If Marthena is frangible and Marthena is believable then Marthena is lxxxii. Red people are botchy. If someone is oligarchic and disputable then they are lxxxii. Red, caitiff people are disputable. If Brandy is frangible and Brandy is believable then Brandy is lxxxii. All oligarchic people are believable. Marthena is not disputable.", "logic": "\nCaitiff(brandy)\nOligarchic(brandy)\nFrangible(marthena)\nOligarchic(marthena)\nLxxxii(marthena)\nBelievable(marthena)\nBotchy(marthena)\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Botchy(x))\nDisputable(brandy) -> Caitiff(brandy)\nFrangible(marthena) and Believable(marthena) -> Lxxxii(marthena)\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) and Disputable(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Believable(x) and Caitiff(x) -> Disputable(x))\nFrangible(brandy) and Believable(brandy) -> Lxxxii(brandy)\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Believable(x))\n\nnot Disputable(marthena)\n\nforall x (Believable(x) and Caitiff(x) -> Disputable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Josh is intoned. Josh is bipartisan. Blythe is clonal. Blythe is bipartisan. Blythe is teal. Blythe is especial. Blythe is alvine. All bipartisan people are alvine. If Josh is effluent then Josh is intoned. If Blythe is clonal and Blythe is especial then Blythe is teal. Red people are alvine. If someone is bipartisan and effluent then they are teal. Red, intoned people are effluent. If Josh is clonal and Josh is especial then Josh is teal. All bipartisan people are especial. Josh is clonal.", "logic": "\nIntoned(josh)\nBipartisan(josh)\nClonal(blythe)\nBipartisan(blythe)\nTeal(blythe)\nEspecial(blythe)\nAlvine(blythe)\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Alvine(x))\nEffluent(josh) -> Intoned(josh)\nClonal(blythe) and Especial(blythe) -> Teal(blythe)\nforall x (Especial(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Effluent(x) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Especial(x) and Intoned(x) -> Effluent(x))\nClonal(josh) and Especial(josh) -> Teal(josh)\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Especial(x))\n\nClonal(josh)\n\nClonal(josh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Lizette is illogical. Lizette is ghostlike. Lizette is accurst. Lizette is suckled. Lizette is ambulant. Cloris is illogical. Cloris is suckled. If something is accurst then it is ghostlike. If something is suckled then it is accurst. If something is bronzed and accurst then it is ghostlike. All clownish things are suckled. All ghostlike, illogical things are bronzed. All ambulant things are suckled. If something is illogical and ambulant then it is clownish. If Lizette is ghostlike and Lizette is bronzed then Lizette is accurst. Lizette is illogical.", "logic": "\nIllogical(lizette)\nGhostlike(lizette)\nAccurst(lizette)\nSuckled(lizette)\nAmbulant(lizette)\nIllogical(cloris)\nSuckled(cloris)\nforall x (Accurst(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> Accurst(x))\nforall x (Bronzed(x) and Accurst(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Clownish(x) -> Suckled(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) and Illogical(x) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Ambulant(x) -> Suckled(x))\nforall x (Illogical(x) and Ambulant(x) -> Clownish(x))\nGhostlike(lizette) and Bronzed(lizette) -> Accurst(lizette)\n\nIllogical(lizette)\n\ntherefore Illogical(lizette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Frieda is fevered. Frieda is isochronal. Frieda is downtown. Frieda is obstetric. Frieda is portly. Essy is fevered. Essy is obstetric. If something is downtown then it is isochronal. If something is obstetric then it is downtown. If something is titulary and downtown then it is isochronal. All salaried things are obstetric. All isochronal, fevered things are titulary. All portly things are obstetric. If something is fevered and portly then it is salaried. If Frieda is isochronal and Frieda is titulary then Frieda is downtown. Essy is not fevered.", "logic": "\nFevered(frieda)\nIsochronal(frieda)\nDowntown(frieda)\nObstetric(frieda)\nPortly(frieda)\nFevered(essy)\nObstetric(essy)\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nforall x (Obstetric(x) -> Downtown(x))\nforall x (Titulary(x) and Downtown(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Obstetric(x))\nforall x (Isochronal(x) and Fevered(x) -> Titulary(x))\nforall x (Portly(x) -> Obstetric(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) and Portly(x) -> Salaried(x))\nIsochronal(frieda) and Titulary(frieda) -> Downtown(frieda)\n\nnot Fevered(essy)\n\ntherefore Fevered(essy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Mitzi is proper. Mitzi is narial. Mitzi is laudable. Mitzi is jaggy. Mitzi is reparable. Tobias is proper. Tobias is jaggy. If something is laudable then it is narial. If something is jaggy then it is laudable. If something is geological and laudable then it is narial. All corporeal things are jaggy. All narial, proper things are geological. All reparable things are jaggy. If something is proper and reparable then it is corporeal. If Mitzi is narial and Mitzi is geological then Mitzi is laudable. Mitzi is geological.", "logic": "\nProper(mitzi)\nNarial(mitzi)\nLaudable(mitzi)\nJaggy(mitzi)\nReparable(mitzi)\nProper(tobias)\nJaggy(tobias)\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Narial(x))\nforall x (Jaggy(x) -> Laudable(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) and Laudable(x) -> Narial(x))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nforall x (Narial(x) and Proper(x) -> Geological(x))\nforall x (Reparable(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nforall x (Proper(x) and Reparable(x) -> Corporeal(x))\nNarial(mitzi) and Geological(mitzi) -> Laudable(mitzi)\n\nGeological(mitzi)\n\nNarial(mitzi) and Proper(mitzi) and forall x (Narial(x) and Proper(x) -> Geological(x)) -> therefore Geological(mitzi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Newton is prosaic. Newton is olfactive. Newton is sainted. Newton is seeping. Newton is despoiled. Kia is prosaic. Kia is seeping. If something is sainted then it is olfactive. If something is seeping then it is sainted. If something is reticent and sainted then it is olfactive. All auxinic things are seeping. All olfactive, prosaic things are reticent. All despoiled things are seeping. If something is prosaic and despoiled then it is auxinic. If Newton is olfactive and Newton is reticent then Newton is sainted. Newton is not auxinic.", "logic": "\nProsaic(newton)\nOlfactive(newton)\nSainted(newton)\nSeeping(newton)\nDespoiled(newton)\nProsaic(kia)\nSeeping(kia)\nforall x (Sainted(x) -> Olfactive(x))\nforall x (Seeping(x) -> Sainted(x))\nforall x (Reticent(x) and Sainted(x) -> Olfactive(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> Seeping(x))\nforall x (Olfactive(x) and Prosaic(x) -> Reticent(x))\nforall x (Despoiled(x) -> Seeping(x))\nforall x (Prosaic(x) and Despoiled(x) -> Auxinic(x))\nOlfactive(newton) and Reticent(newton) -> Sainted(newton)\n\nnot Auxinic(newton)\n\nProsaic(newton) and Despoiled(newton) and forall x (Prosaic(x) and Despoiled(x) -> Auxinic(x)) -> therefore Auxinic(newton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Woochang is unrecorded. Woochang is dextrorse. Woochang is spurned. Woochang is bathetic. Woochang is handed. Prudy is unrecorded. Prudy is bathetic. If something is spurned then it is dextrorse. If something is bathetic then it is spurned. If something is romanic and spurned then it is dextrorse. All grizzled things are bathetic. All dextrorse, unrecorded things are romanic. All handed things are bathetic. If something is unrecorded and handed then it is grizzled. If Woochang is dextrorse and Woochang is romanic then Woochang is spurned. Prudy is dextrorse.", "logic": "\nUnrecorded(woochang)\nDextrorse(woochang)\nSpurned(woochang)\nBathetic(woochang)\nHanded(woochang)\nUnrecorded(prudy)\nBathetic(prudy)\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\nforall x (Bathetic(x) -> Spurned(x))\nforall x (Romanic(x) and Spurned(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\nforall x (Grizzled(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and Unrecorded(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Handed(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) and Handed(x) -> Grizzled(x))\nDextrorse(woochang) and Romanic(woochang) -> Spurned(woochang)\n\nDextrorse(prudy)\n\nBathetic(prudy) and forall x (Bathetic(x) -> Spurned(x)) -> therefore Spurned(prudy) Spurned(prudy) and forall x (Spurned(x) -> Dextrorse(x)) -> therefore Dextrorse(prudy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Willamina is swaybacked. Willamina is dotty. Willamina is creaseless. Willamina is antheral. Willamina is myotonic. Kia is swaybacked. Kia is antheral. If something is creaseless then it is dotty. If something is antheral then it is creaseless. If something is ascensive and creaseless then it is dotty. All primed things are antheral. All dotty, swaybacked things are ascensive. All myotonic things are antheral. If something is swaybacked and myotonic then it is primed. If Willamina is dotty and Willamina is ascensive then Willamina is creaseless. Kia is not dotty.", "logic": "\nSwaybacked(willamina)\nDotty(willamina)\nCreaseless(willamina)\nAntheral(willamina)\nMyotonic(willamina)\nSwaybacked(kia)\nAntheral(kia)\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> Dotty(x))\nforall x (Antheral(x) -> Creaseless(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) and Creaseless(x) -> Dotty(x))\nforall x (Primed(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Dotty(x) and Swaybacked(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Antheral(x))\nforall x (Swaybacked(x) and Myotonic(x) -> Primed(x))\nDotty(willamina) and Ascensive(willamina) -> Creaseless(willamina)\n\nnot Dotty(kia)\n\nAntheral(kia) and forall x (Antheral(x) -> Creaseless(x)) -> therefore Creaseless(kia) Creaseless(kia) and forall x (Creaseless(x) -> Dotty(x)) -> therefore Dotty(kia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Patty is hardy. Patty is untilled. Patty is ireful. Patty is waxy. Patty is ravenous. Ragnhild is hardy. Ragnhild is waxy. If something is ireful then it is untilled. If something is waxy then it is ireful. If something is colorful and ireful then it is untilled. All bulimic things are waxy. All untilled, hardy things are colorful. All ravenous things are waxy. If something is hardy and ravenous then it is bulimic. If Patty is untilled and Patty is colorful then Patty is ireful. Ragnhild is colorful.", "logic": "\nHardy(patty)\nUntilled(patty)\nIreful(patty)\nWaxy(patty)\nRavenous(patty)\nHardy(ragnhild)\nWaxy(ragnhild)\nforall x (Ireful(x) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Waxy(x) -> Ireful(x))\nforall x (Colorful(x) and Ireful(x) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Waxy(x))\nforall x (Untilled(x) and Hardy(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Ravenous(x) -> Waxy(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) and Ravenous(x) -> Bulimic(x))\nUntilled(patty) and Colorful(patty) -> Ireful(patty)\n\nColorful(ragnhild)\n\nWaxy(ragnhild) and forall x (Waxy(x) -> Ireful(x)) -> therefore Ireful(ragnhild) Ireful(ragnhild) and forall x (Ireful(x) -> Untilled(x)) -> therefore Untilled(ragnhild) Untilled(ragnhild) and Hardy(ragnhild) and forall x (Untilled(x) and Hardy(x) -> Colorful(x)) -> therefore Colorful(ragnhild)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Fonsie is aflicker. Fonsie is ulcerative. Fonsie is leavened. Fonsie is snoopy. Fonsie is headless. Roshelle is aflicker. Roshelle is snoopy. If something is leavened then it is ulcerative. If something is snoopy then it is leavened. If something is shitless and leavened then it is ulcerative. All mitral things are snoopy. All ulcerative, aflicker things are shitless. All headless things are snoopy. If something is aflicker and headless then it is mitral. If Fonsie is ulcerative and Fonsie is shitless then Fonsie is leavened. Roshelle is not shitless.", "logic": "\nAflicker(fonsie)\nUlcerative(fonsie)\nLeavened(fonsie)\nSnoopy(fonsie)\nHeadless(fonsie)\nAflicker(roshelle)\nSnoopy(roshelle)\nforall x (Leavened(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Snoopy(x) -> Leavened(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) and Leavened(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nforall x (Ulcerative(x) and Aflicker(x) -> Shitless(x))\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nforall x (Aflicker(x) and Headless(x) -> Mitral(x))\nUlcerative(fonsie) and Shitless(fonsie) -> Leavened(fonsie)\n\nnot Shitless(roshelle)\n\nSnoopy(roshelle) and forall x (Snoopy(x) -> Leavened(x)) -> therefore Leavened(roshelle) Leavened(roshelle) and forall x (Leavened(x) -> Ulcerative(x)) -> therefore Ulcerative(roshelle) Ulcerative(roshelle) and Aflicker(roshelle) and forall x (Ulcerative(x) and Aflicker(x) -> Shitless(x)) -> therefore Shitless(roshelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Garvy is passerine. Garvy is windward. Garvy is battered. Garvy is oracular. Garvy is footloose. Corrina is passerine. Corrina is oracular. If something is battered then it is windward. If something is oracular then it is battered. If something is unfeminine and battered then it is windward. All unarmored things are oracular. All windward, passerine things are unfeminine. All footloose things are oracular. If something is passerine and footloose then it is unarmored. If Garvy is windward and Garvy is unfeminine then Garvy is battered. Corrina is not unarmored.", "logic": "\nPasserine(garvy)\nWindward(garvy)\nBattered(garvy)\nOracular(garvy)\nFootloose(garvy)\nPasserine(corrina)\nOracular(corrina)\nforall x (Battered(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Battered(x))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and Battered(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Unarmored(x) -> Oracular(x))\nforall x (Windward(x) and Passerine(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Footloose(x) -> Oracular(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Footloose(x) -> Unarmored(x))\nWindward(garvy) and Unfeminine(garvy) -> Battered(garvy)\n\nnot Unarmored(corrina)\n\nforall x (Passerine(x) and Footloose(x) -> Unarmored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Ira is censurable. Ira is volunteer. Ira is monocled. Ira is crapulous. Ira is swampy. Shepherd is censurable. Shepherd is crapulous. If something is monocled then it is volunteer. If something is crapulous then it is monocled. If something is condemning and monocled then it is volunteer. All euphonious things are crapulous. All volunteer, censurable things are condemning. All swampy things are crapulous. If something is censurable and swampy then it is euphonious. If Ira is volunteer and Ira is condemning then Ira is monocled. Shepherd is swampy.", "logic": "\nCensurable(ira)\nVolunteer(ira)\nMonocled(ira)\nCrapulous(ira)\nSwampy(ira)\nCensurable(shepherd)\nCrapulous(shepherd)\nforall x (Monocled(x) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Crapulous(x) -> Monocled(x))\nforall x (Condemning(x) and Monocled(x) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Euphonious(x) -> Crapulous(x))\nforall x (Volunteer(x) and Censurable(x) -> Condemning(x))\nforall x (Swampy(x) -> Crapulous(x))\nforall x (Censurable(x) and Swampy(x) -> Euphonious(x))\nVolunteer(ira) and Condemning(ira) -> Monocled(ira)\n\nSwampy(shepherd)\n\nSwampy(shepherd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Romeo is wholemeal. Romeo is lingual. Romeo is multiplied. Sergio is alliaceous. Sergio is wholemeal. Sergio is trapped. Margy is multiplied. Margy is grovelling. Margy is trapped. Layne is trapped. If Romeo is not decumbent and Romeo is not trapped then Romeo is lingual. Quiet things are grovelling. If Layne is trapped then Layne is lingual. Blue things are lingual. If Sergio is grovelling then Sergio is not multiplied. If something is decumbent then it is wholemeal. Margy is grovelling.", "logic": "\nWholemeal(romeo)\nLingual(romeo)\nMultiplied(romeo)\nAlliaceous(sergio)\nWholemeal(sergio)\nTrapped(sergio)\nMultiplied(margy)\nGrovelling(margy)\nTrapped(margy)\nTrapped(layne)\nnot Decumbent(romeo) and not Trapped(romeo) -> Lingual(romeo)\nforall x (Lingual(x) -> Grovelling(x))\nTrapped(layne) -> Lingual(layne)\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) -> Lingual(x))\nGrovelling(sergio) -> not Multiplied(sergio)\nforall x (Decumbent(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\n\nGrovelling(margy)\n\ntherefore Grovelling(margy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Antonie is raptorial. Antonie is pulverized. Antonie is highbrow. Gabey is lateral. Gabey is raptorial. Gabey is vagabond. Polly is highbrow. Polly is phrenic. Polly is vagabond. Estele is vagabond. If Antonie is not cyprinid and Antonie is not vagabond then Antonie is pulverized. Quiet things are phrenic. If Estele is vagabond then Estele is pulverized. Blue things are pulverized. If Gabey is phrenic then Gabey is not highbrow. If something is cyprinid then it is raptorial. Polly is not highbrow.", "logic": "\nRaptorial(antonie)\nPulverized(antonie)\nHighbrow(antonie)\nLateral(gabey)\nRaptorial(gabey)\nVagabond(gabey)\nHighbrow(polly)\nPhrenic(polly)\nVagabond(polly)\nVagabond(estele)\nnot Cyprinid(antonie) and not Vagabond(antonie) -> Pulverized(antonie)\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nVagabond(estele) -> Pulverized(estele)\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Pulverized(x))\nPhrenic(gabey) -> not Highbrow(gabey)\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) -> Raptorial(x))\n\nnot Highbrow(polly)\n\ntherefore Highbrow(polly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Boris is deistic. Boris is tuneless. Boris is acropetal. Marketa is bashful. Marketa is deistic. Marketa is gallant. Baldwin is acropetal. Baldwin is zillion. Baldwin is gallant. Ruben is gallant. If Boris is not serene and Boris is not gallant then Boris is tuneless. Quiet things are zillion. If Ruben is gallant then Ruben is tuneless. Blue things are tuneless. If Marketa is zillion then Marketa is not acropetal. If something is serene then it is deistic. Marketa is tuneless.", "logic": "\nDeistic(boris)\nTuneless(boris)\nAcropetal(boris)\nBashful(marketa)\nDeistic(marketa)\nGallant(marketa)\nAcropetal(baldwin)\nZillion(baldwin)\nGallant(baldwin)\nGallant(ruben)\nnot Serene(boris) and not Gallant(boris) -> Tuneless(boris)\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Zillion(x))\nGallant(ruben) -> Tuneless(ruben)\nforall x (Bashful(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nZillion(marketa) -> not Acropetal(marketa)\nforall x (Serene(x) -> Deistic(x))\n\nTuneless(marketa)\n\nBashful(marketa) and forall x (Bashful(x) -> Tuneless(x)) -> therefore Tuneless(marketa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Dwight is lachrymose. Dwight is portuguese. Dwight is stunning. Eartha is ctenoid. Eartha is lachrymose. Eartha is southward. Randall is stunning. Randall is descending. Randall is southward. Maynard is southward. If Dwight is not upwind and Dwight is not southward then Dwight is portuguese. Quiet things are descending. If Maynard is southward then Maynard is portuguese. Blue things are portuguese. If Eartha is descending then Eartha is not stunning. If something is upwind then it is lachrymose. Dwight is not descending.", "logic": "\nLachrymose(dwight)\nPortuguese(dwight)\nStunning(dwight)\nCtenoid(eartha)\nLachrymose(eartha)\nSouthward(eartha)\nStunning(randall)\nDescending(randall)\nSouthward(randall)\nSouthward(maynard)\nnot Upwind(dwight) and not Southward(dwight) -> Portuguese(dwight)\nforall x (Portuguese(x) -> Descending(x))\nSouthward(maynard) -> Portuguese(maynard)\nforall x (Ctenoid(x) -> Portuguese(x))\nDescending(eartha) -> not Stunning(eartha)\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> Lachrymose(x))\n\nnot Descending(dwight)\n\nPortuguese(dwight) and forall x (Portuguese(x) -> Descending(x)) -> therefore Descending(dwight)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Elly is optimal. Elly is buff. Elly is eastmost. Agretha is lotic. Agretha is optimal. Agretha is linked. Eve is eastmost. Eve is lacerated. Eve is linked. Annice is linked. If Elly is not bowleg and Elly is not linked then Elly is buff. Quiet things are lacerated. If Annice is linked then Annice is buff. Blue things are buff. If Agretha is lacerated then Agretha is not eastmost. If something is bowleg then it is optimal. Agretha is lacerated.", "logic": "\nOptimal(elly)\nBuff(elly)\nEastmost(elly)\nLotic(agretha)\nOptimal(agretha)\nLinked(agretha)\nEastmost(eve)\nLacerated(eve)\nLinked(eve)\nLinked(annice)\nnot Bowleg(elly) and not Linked(elly) -> Buff(elly)\nforall x (Buff(x) -> Lacerated(x))\nLinked(annice) -> Buff(annice)\nforall x (Lotic(x) -> Buff(x))\nLacerated(agretha) -> not Eastmost(agretha)\nforall x (Bowleg(x) -> Optimal(x))\n\nLacerated(agretha)\n\nLotic(agretha) and forall x (Lotic(x) -> Buff(x)) -> therefore Buff(agretha) Buff(agretha) and forall x (Buff(x) -> Lacerated(x)) -> therefore Lacerated(agretha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Viviana is aspherical. Viviana is cresson. Viviana is dense. Mada is deciduous. Mada is aspherical. Mada is undivided. Stearn is dense. Stearn is hornless. Stearn is undivided. Donni is undivided. If Viviana is not citywide and Viviana is not undivided then Viviana is cresson. Quiet things are hornless. If Donni is undivided then Donni is cresson. Blue things are cresson. If Mada is hornless then Mada is not dense. If something is citywide then it is aspherical. Donni is not hornless.", "logic": "\nAspherical(viviana)\nCresson(viviana)\nDense(viviana)\nDeciduous(mada)\nAspherical(mada)\nUndivided(mada)\nDense(stearn)\nHornless(stearn)\nUndivided(stearn)\nUndivided(donni)\nnot Citywide(viviana) and not Undivided(viviana) -> Cresson(viviana)\nforall x (Cresson(x) -> Hornless(x))\nUndivided(donni) -> Cresson(donni)\nforall x (Deciduous(x) -> Cresson(x))\nHornless(mada) -> not Dense(mada)\nforall x (Citywide(x) -> Aspherical(x))\n\nnot Hornless(donni)\n\nUndivided(donni) and Undivided(donni) -> Cresson(donni) -> therefore Cresson(donni) Cresson(donni) and forall x (Cresson(x) -> Hornless(x)) -> therefore Hornless(donni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Orville is fleeting. Orville is entozoan. Orville is synonymous. Marcelia is postpartum. Marcelia is fleeting. Marcelia is castled. Cora is synonymous. Cora is insatiate. Cora is castled. Darrick is castled. If Orville is not effective and Orville is not castled then Orville is entozoan. Quiet things are insatiate. If Darrick is castled then Darrick is entozoan. Blue things are entozoan. If Marcelia is insatiate then Marcelia is not synonymous. If something is effective then it is fleeting. Marcelia is not synonymous.", "logic": "\nFleeting(orville)\nEntozoan(orville)\nSynonymous(orville)\nPostpartum(marcelia)\nFleeting(marcelia)\nCastled(marcelia)\nSynonymous(cora)\nInsatiate(cora)\nCastled(cora)\nCastled(darrick)\nnot Effective(orville) and not Castled(orville) -> Entozoan(orville)\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> Insatiate(x))\nCastled(darrick) -> Entozoan(darrick)\nforall x (Postpartum(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nInsatiate(marcelia) -> not Synonymous(marcelia)\nforall x (Effective(x) -> Fleeting(x))\n\nnot Synonymous(marcelia)\n\nPostpartum(marcelia) and forall x (Postpartum(x) -> Entozoan(x)) -> therefore Entozoan(marcelia) Entozoan(marcelia) and forall x (Entozoan(x) -> Insatiate(x)) -> therefore Insatiate(marcelia) Insatiate(marcelia) and Insatiate(marcelia) -> not Synonymous(marcelia) -> therefore not Synonymous(marcelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Gonzalo is unsalted. Gonzalo is figurative. Gonzalo is rushlike. Celia is pushy. Celia is unsalted. Celia is barefooted. Kathie is rushlike. Kathie is limiting. Kathie is barefooted. Paddy is barefooted. If Gonzalo is not xcviii and Gonzalo is not barefooted then Gonzalo is figurative. Quiet things are limiting. If Paddy is barefooted then Paddy is figurative. Blue things are figurative. If Celia is limiting then Celia is not rushlike. If something is xcviii then it is unsalted. Celia is rushlike.", "logic": "\nUnsalted(gonzalo)\nFigurative(gonzalo)\nRushlike(gonzalo)\nPushy(celia)\nUnsalted(celia)\nBarefooted(celia)\nRushlike(kathie)\nLimiting(kathie)\nBarefooted(kathie)\nBarefooted(paddy)\nnot Xcviii(gonzalo) and not Barefooted(gonzalo) -> Figurative(gonzalo)\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Limiting(x))\nBarefooted(paddy) -> Figurative(paddy)\nforall x (Pushy(x) -> Figurative(x))\nLimiting(celia) -> not Rushlike(celia)\nforall x (Xcviii(x) -> Unsalted(x))\n\nRushlike(celia)\n\nPushy(celia) and forall x (Pushy(x) -> Figurative(x)) -> therefore Figurative(celia) Figurative(celia) and forall x (Figurative(x) -> Limiting(x)) -> therefore Limiting(celia) Limiting(celia) and Limiting(celia) -> not Rushlike(celia) -> therefore not Rushlike(celia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Stuart is steerable. Stuart is impeding. Stuart is reinforced. Rusty is frugal. Rusty is steerable. Rusty is semihard. Jarvis is reinforced. Jarvis is despondent. Jarvis is semihard. Torie is semihard. If Stuart is not intuitive and Stuart is not semihard then Stuart is impeding. Quiet things are despondent. If Torie is semihard then Torie is impeding. Blue things are impeding. If Rusty is despondent then Rusty is not reinforced. If something is intuitive then it is steerable. Torie is not steerable.", "logic": "\nSteerable(stuart)\nImpeding(stuart)\nReinforced(stuart)\nFrugal(rusty)\nSteerable(rusty)\nSemihard(rusty)\nReinforced(jarvis)\nDespondent(jarvis)\nSemihard(jarvis)\nSemihard(torie)\nnot Intuitive(stuart) and not Semihard(stuart) -> Impeding(stuart)\nforall x (Impeding(x) -> Despondent(x))\nSemihard(torie) -> Impeding(torie)\nforall x (Frugal(x) -> Impeding(x))\nDespondent(rusty) -> not Reinforced(rusty)\nforall x (Intuitive(x) -> Steerable(x))\n\nnot Steerable(torie)\n\nforall x (Intuitive(x) -> Steerable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Sabra is unclaimed. Sabra is flavourous. Sabra is slaveless. Jorey is spendable. Jorey is unclaimed. Jorey is decollete. Jacinthe is slaveless. Jacinthe is oceanic. Jacinthe is decollete. Armand is decollete. If Sabra is not penniless and Sabra is not decollete then Sabra is flavourous. Quiet things are oceanic. If Armand is decollete then Armand is flavourous. Blue things are flavourous. If Jorey is oceanic then Jorey is not slaveless. If something is penniless then it is unclaimed. Jacinthe is unclaimed.", "logic": "\nUnclaimed(sabra)\nFlavourous(sabra)\nSlaveless(sabra)\nSpendable(jorey)\nUnclaimed(jorey)\nDecollete(jorey)\nSlaveless(jacinthe)\nOceanic(jacinthe)\nDecollete(jacinthe)\nDecollete(armand)\nnot Penniless(sabra) and not Decollete(sabra) -> Flavourous(sabra)\nforall x (Flavourous(x) -> Oceanic(x))\nDecollete(armand) -> Flavourous(armand)\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Flavourous(x))\nOceanic(jorey) -> not Slaveless(jorey)\nforall x (Penniless(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\n\nUnclaimed(jacinthe)\n\nforall x (Penniless(x) -> Unclaimed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Srinivas is advance. Srinivas is crummy. Srinivas is subtle. Marga is yugoslav. Marga is advance. Marga is uninvolved. Hyacinthe is subtle. Hyacinthe is boyish. Hyacinthe is uninvolved. Drake is uninvolved. If Srinivas is not dead and Srinivas is not uninvolved then Srinivas is crummy. Quiet things are boyish. If Drake is uninvolved then Drake is crummy. Blue things are crummy. If Marga is boyish then Marga is not subtle. If something is dead then it is advance. Hyacinthe is not crummy.", "logic": "\nAdvance(srinivas)\nCrummy(srinivas)\nSubtle(srinivas)\nYugoslav(marga)\nAdvance(marga)\nUninvolved(marga)\nSubtle(hyacinthe)\nBoyish(hyacinthe)\nUninvolved(hyacinthe)\nUninvolved(drake)\nnot Dead(srinivas) and not Uninvolved(srinivas) -> Crummy(srinivas)\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Boyish(x))\nUninvolved(drake) -> Crummy(drake)\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Crummy(x))\nBoyish(marga) -> not Subtle(marga)\nforall x (Dead(x) -> Advance(x))\n\nnot Crummy(hyacinthe)\n\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Crummy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Elizabet is loquacious. Elizabet is aflame. Elizabet is roughshod. Quent is porose. Quent is loquacious. Quent is saharan. Analise is roughshod. Analise is cragged. Analise is saharan. Dominica is saharan. If Elizabet is not judaical and Elizabet is not saharan then Elizabet is aflame. Quiet things are cragged. If Dominica is saharan then Dominica is aflame. Blue things are aflame. If Quent is cragged then Quent is not roughshod. If something is judaical then it is loquacious. Dominica is judaical.", "logic": "\nLoquacious(elizabet)\nAflame(elizabet)\nRoughshod(elizabet)\nPorose(quent)\nLoquacious(quent)\nSaharan(quent)\nRoughshod(analise)\nCragged(analise)\nSaharan(analise)\nSaharan(dominica)\nnot Judaical(elizabet) and not Saharan(elizabet) -> Aflame(elizabet)\nforall x (Aflame(x) -> Cragged(x))\nSaharan(dominica) -> Aflame(dominica)\nforall x (Porose(x) -> Aflame(x))\nCragged(quent) -> not Roughshod(quent)\nforall x (Judaical(x) -> Loquacious(x))\n\nJudaical(dominica)\n\nJudaical(dominica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Fanny is synchronic. Fanny is taliped. Fanny is authentic. Wolfram is unmelodic. Wolfram is synchronic. Wolfram is wartlike. Murdock is authentic. Murdock is inured. Murdock is wartlike. Yolane is wartlike. If Fanny is not hilar and Fanny is not wartlike then Fanny is taliped. Quiet things are inured. If Yolane is wartlike then Yolane is taliped. Blue things are taliped. If Wolfram is inured then Wolfram is not authentic. If something is hilar then it is synchronic. Wolfram is not hilar.", "logic": "\nSynchronic(fanny)\nTaliped(fanny)\nAuthentic(fanny)\nUnmelodic(wolfram)\nSynchronic(wolfram)\nWartlike(wolfram)\nAuthentic(murdock)\nInured(murdock)\nWartlike(murdock)\nWartlike(yolane)\nnot Hilar(fanny) and not Wartlike(fanny) -> Taliped(fanny)\nforall x (Taliped(x) -> Inured(x))\nWartlike(yolane) -> Taliped(yolane)\nforall x (Unmelodic(x) -> Taliped(x))\nInured(wolfram) -> not Authentic(wolfram)\nforall x (Hilar(x) -> Synchronic(x))\n\nnot Hilar(wolfram)\n\nnot Hilar(wolfram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Gunvor is unbooked. Gunvor is summative. Gunvor is brusk. Klara is melodious. Klara is unbooked. Klara is foliolate. Brandon is brusk. Brandon is adorned. Brandon is foliolate. Jaclin is foliolate. If Gunvor is not bardic and Gunvor is not foliolate then Gunvor is summative. Quiet things are adorned. If Jaclin is foliolate then Jaclin is summative. Blue things are summative. If Klara is adorned then Klara is not brusk. If something is bardic then it is unbooked. Brandon is melodious.", "logic": "\nUnbooked(gunvor)\nSummative(gunvor)\nBrusk(gunvor)\nMelodious(klara)\nUnbooked(klara)\nFoliolate(klara)\nBrusk(brandon)\nAdorned(brandon)\nFoliolate(brandon)\nFoliolate(jaclin)\nnot Bardic(gunvor) and not Foliolate(gunvor) -> Summative(gunvor)\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Adorned(x))\nFoliolate(jaclin) -> Summative(jaclin)\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Summative(x))\nAdorned(klara) -> not Brusk(klara)\nforall x (Bardic(x) -> Unbooked(x))\n\nMelodious(brandon)\n\nMelodious(brandon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Brigida is repugnant. Brigida is cerebral. Brigida is foiled. Chris is derisory. Chris is repugnant. Chris is unservile. Coralyn is foiled. Coralyn is blockaded. Coralyn is unservile. Devina is unservile. If Brigida is not unmade and Brigida is not unservile then Brigida is cerebral. Quiet things are blockaded. If Devina is unservile then Devina is cerebral. Blue things are cerebral. If Chris is blockaded then Chris is not foiled. If something is unmade then it is repugnant. Devina is not derisory.", "logic": "\nRepugnant(brigida)\nCerebral(brigida)\nFoiled(brigida)\nDerisory(chris)\nRepugnant(chris)\nUnservile(chris)\nFoiled(coralyn)\nBlockaded(coralyn)\nUnservile(coralyn)\nUnservile(devina)\nnot Unmade(brigida) and not Unservile(brigida) -> Cerebral(brigida)\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> Blockaded(x))\nUnservile(devina) -> Cerebral(devina)\nforall x (Derisory(x) -> Cerebral(x))\nBlockaded(chris) -> not Foiled(chris)\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Repugnant(x))\n\nnot Derisory(devina)\n\nnot Derisory(devina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Debor is narcotised. Debor is blamed. Debor is dress. Leonidas is mesmerized. Leonidas is narcotised. Leonidas is synoecious. Nancie is dress. Nancie is mandean. Nancie is synoecious. Perri is synoecious. If Debor is not abysmal and Debor is not synoecious then Debor is blamed. Quiet things are mandean. If Perri is synoecious then Perri is blamed. Blue things are blamed. If Leonidas is mandean then Leonidas is not dress. If something is abysmal then it is narcotised. Perri is dress.", "logic": "\nNarcotised(debor)\nBlamed(debor)\nDress(debor)\nMesmerized(leonidas)\nNarcotised(leonidas)\nSynoecious(leonidas)\nDress(nancie)\nMandean(nancie)\nSynoecious(nancie)\nSynoecious(perri)\nnot Abysmal(debor) and not Synoecious(debor) -> Blamed(debor)\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Mandean(x))\nSynoecious(perri) -> Blamed(perri)\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) -> Blamed(x))\nMandean(leonidas) -> not Dress(leonidas)\nforall x (Abysmal(x) -> Narcotised(x))\n\nDress(perri)\n\nDress(perri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Felipe is not hyoid. Willie is not fanned. Willie is salacious. Willie is throwaway. Willie is hyoid. Willie is not lenient. Willie is awake. Joab is hyoid. Lisbeth is not nurturant. Lisbeth is salacious. If someone is hyoid then they are nurturant. If Joab is nurturant then Joab is throwaway. If Joab is nurturant and Joab is not salacious then Joab is hyoid. All throwaway people are awake. If someone is lenient and fanned then they are not throwaway. If Willie is not nurturant then Willie is fanned. Willie is not fanned.", "logic": "\nnot Hyoid(felipe)\nnot Fanned(willie)\nSalacious(willie)\nThrowaway(willie)\nHyoid(willie)\nnot Lenient(willie)\nAwake(willie)\nHyoid(joab)\nnot Nurturant(lisbeth)\nSalacious(lisbeth)\nforall x (Hyoid(x) -> Nurturant(x))\nNurturant(joab) -> Throwaway(joab)\nNurturant(joab) and not Salacious(joab) -> Hyoid(joab)\nforall x (Throwaway(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Lenient(x) and Fanned(x) -> not Throwaway(x))\nnot Nurturant(willie) -> Fanned(willie)\n\nnot Fanned(willie)\n\ntherefore not Fanned(willie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Shalne is not miry. Dora is not ruminant. Dora is clouded. Dora is nuptial. Dora is miry. Dora is not noetic. Dora is burdensome. Ginelle is miry. Tan is not lyonnaise. Tan is clouded. If someone is miry then they are lyonnaise. If Ginelle is lyonnaise then Ginelle is nuptial. If Ginelle is lyonnaise and Ginelle is not clouded then Ginelle is miry. All nuptial people are burdensome. If someone is noetic and ruminant then they are not nuptial. If Dora is not lyonnaise then Dora is ruminant. Dora is ruminant.", "logic": "\nnot Miry(shalne)\nnot Ruminant(dora)\nClouded(dora)\nNuptial(dora)\nMiry(dora)\nnot Noetic(dora)\nBurdensome(dora)\nMiry(ginelle)\nnot Lyonnaise(tan)\nClouded(tan)\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nLyonnaise(ginelle) -> Nuptial(ginelle)\nLyonnaise(ginelle) and not Clouded(ginelle) -> Miry(ginelle)\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Noetic(x) and Ruminant(x) -> not Nuptial(x))\nnot Lyonnaise(dora) -> Ruminant(dora)\n\nRuminant(dora)\n\ntherefore not Ruminant(dora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Charmane is not trite. Keil is not aeriferous. Keil is adamant. Keil is filmy. Keil is trite. Keil is not briary. Keil is boughed. Roddie is trite. Magdalen is not crispate. Magdalen is adamant. If someone is trite then they are crispate. If Roddie is crispate then Roddie is filmy. If Roddie is crispate and Roddie is not adamant then Roddie is trite. All filmy people are boughed. If someone is briary and aeriferous then they are not filmy. If Keil is not crispate then Keil is aeriferous. Keil is crispate.", "logic": "\nnot Trite(charmane)\nnot Aeriferous(keil)\nAdamant(keil)\nFilmy(keil)\nTrite(keil)\nnot Briary(keil)\nBoughed(keil)\nTrite(roddie)\nnot Crispate(magdalen)\nAdamant(magdalen)\nforall x (Trite(x) -> Crispate(x))\nCrispate(roddie) -> Filmy(roddie)\nCrispate(roddie) and not Adamant(roddie) -> Trite(roddie)\nforall x (Filmy(x) -> Boughed(x))\nforall x (Briary(x) and Aeriferous(x) -> not Filmy(x))\nnot Crispate(keil) -> Aeriferous(keil)\n\nCrispate(keil)\n\nTrite(keil) and forall x (Trite(x) -> Crispate(x)) -> therefore Crispate(keil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Davon is not disabled. Phil is not tokenish. Phil is scorned. Phil is bacchanal. Phil is disabled. Phil is not sandpapery. Phil is shrivelled. Trey is disabled. Lynna is not reniform. Lynna is scorned. If someone is disabled then they are reniform. If Trey is reniform then Trey is bacchanal. If Trey is reniform and Trey is not scorned then Trey is disabled. All bacchanal people are shrivelled. If someone is sandpapery and tokenish then they are not bacchanal. If Phil is not reniform then Phil is tokenish. Trey is not reniform.", "logic": "\nnot Disabled(davon)\nnot Tokenish(phil)\nScorned(phil)\nBacchanal(phil)\nDisabled(phil)\nnot Sandpapery(phil)\nShrivelled(phil)\nDisabled(trey)\nnot Reniform(lynna)\nScorned(lynna)\nforall x (Disabled(x) -> Reniform(x))\nReniform(trey) -> Bacchanal(trey)\nReniform(trey) and not Scorned(trey) -> Disabled(trey)\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Shrivelled(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Tokenish(x) -> not Bacchanal(x))\nnot Reniform(phil) -> Tokenish(phil)\n\nnot Reniform(trey)\n\nDisabled(trey) and forall x (Disabled(x) -> Reniform(x)) -> therefore Reniform(trey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Barby is not umbellate. Vaughan is not gothic. Vaughan is soulless. Vaughan is unfenced. Vaughan is umbellate. Vaughan is not osteal. Vaughan is exegetical. Angela is umbellate. Leonidas is not crummy. Leonidas is soulless. If someone is umbellate then they are crummy. If Angela is crummy then Angela is unfenced. If Angela is crummy and Angela is not soulless then Angela is umbellate. All unfenced people are exegetical. If someone is osteal and gothic then they are not unfenced. If Vaughan is not crummy then Vaughan is gothic. Angela is unfenced.", "logic": "\nnot Umbellate(barby)\nnot Gothic(vaughan)\nSoulless(vaughan)\nUnfenced(vaughan)\nUmbellate(vaughan)\nnot Osteal(vaughan)\nExegetical(vaughan)\nUmbellate(angela)\nnot Crummy(leonidas)\nSoulless(leonidas)\nforall x (Umbellate(x) -> Crummy(x))\nCrummy(angela) -> Unfenced(angela)\nCrummy(angela) and not Soulless(angela) -> Umbellate(angela)\nforall x (Unfenced(x) -> Exegetical(x))\nforall x (Osteal(x) and Gothic(x) -> not Unfenced(x))\nnot Crummy(vaughan) -> Gothic(vaughan)\n\nUnfenced(angela)\n\nUmbellate(angela) and forall x (Umbellate(x) -> Crummy(x)) -> therefore Crummy(angela) Crummy(angela) and Crummy(angela) -> Unfenced(angela) -> therefore Unfenced(angela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Wiley is not triune. Annabelle is not slav. Annabelle is trusted. Annabelle is pillaged. Annabelle is triune. Annabelle is not coccygeal. Annabelle is unimpeded. Lauraine is triune. Clare is not ordained. Clare is trusted. If someone is triune then they are ordained. If Lauraine is ordained then Lauraine is pillaged. If Lauraine is ordained and Lauraine is not trusted then Lauraine is triune. All pillaged people are unimpeded. If someone is coccygeal and slav then they are not pillaged. If Annabelle is not ordained then Annabelle is slav. Lauraine is not pillaged.", "logic": "\nnot Triune(wiley)\nnot Slav(annabelle)\nTrusted(annabelle)\nPillaged(annabelle)\nTriune(annabelle)\nnot Coccygeal(annabelle)\nUnimpeded(annabelle)\nTriune(lauraine)\nnot Ordained(clare)\nTrusted(clare)\nforall x (Triune(x) -> Ordained(x))\nOrdained(lauraine) -> Pillaged(lauraine)\nOrdained(lauraine) and not Trusted(lauraine) -> Triune(lauraine)\nforall x (Pillaged(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) and Slav(x) -> not Pillaged(x))\nnot Ordained(annabelle) -> Slav(annabelle)\n\nnot Pillaged(lauraine)\n\nTriune(lauraine) and forall x (Triune(x) -> Ordained(x)) -> therefore Ordained(lauraine) Ordained(lauraine) and Ordained(lauraine) -> Pillaged(lauraine) -> therefore Pillaged(lauraine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "William is not loved. Hillary is not corsican. Hillary is laminar. Hillary is slow. Hillary is loved. Hillary is not patrician. Hillary is impatient. Caresa is loved. Mendie is not blabby. Mendie is laminar. If someone is loved then they are blabby. If Caresa is blabby then Caresa is slow. If Caresa is blabby and Caresa is not laminar then Caresa is loved. All slow people are impatient. If someone is patrician and corsican then they are not slow. If Hillary is not blabby then Hillary is corsican. Caresa is impatient.", "logic": "\nnot Loved(william)\nnot Corsican(hillary)\nLaminar(hillary)\nSlow(hillary)\nLoved(hillary)\nnot Patrician(hillary)\nImpatient(hillary)\nLoved(caresa)\nnot Blabby(mendie)\nLaminar(mendie)\nforall x (Loved(x) -> Blabby(x))\nBlabby(caresa) -> Slow(caresa)\nBlabby(caresa) and not Laminar(caresa) -> Loved(caresa)\nforall x (Slow(x) -> Impatient(x))\nforall x (Patrician(x) and Corsican(x) -> not Slow(x))\nnot Blabby(hillary) -> Corsican(hillary)\n\nImpatient(caresa)\n\nLoved(caresa) and forall x (Loved(x) -> Blabby(x)) -> therefore Blabby(caresa) Blabby(caresa) and Blabby(caresa) -> Slow(caresa) -> therefore Slow(caresa) Slow(caresa) and forall x (Slow(x) -> Impatient(x)) -> therefore Impatient(caresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Reta is not accented. Violette is not soundless. Violette is tolerable. Violette is capricious. Violette is accented. Violette is not neotenic. Violette is submersed. Lottie is accented. Rosemonde is not suicidal. Rosemonde is tolerable. If someone is accented then they are suicidal. If Lottie is suicidal then Lottie is capricious. If Lottie is suicidal and Lottie is not tolerable then Lottie is accented. All capricious people are submersed. If someone is neotenic and soundless then they are not capricious. If Violette is not suicidal then Violette is soundless. Lottie is not submersed.", "logic": "\nnot Accented(reta)\nnot Soundless(violette)\nTolerable(violette)\nCapricious(violette)\nAccented(violette)\nnot Neotenic(violette)\nSubmersed(violette)\nAccented(lottie)\nnot Suicidal(rosemonde)\nTolerable(rosemonde)\nforall x (Accented(x) -> Suicidal(x))\nSuicidal(lottie) -> Capricious(lottie)\nSuicidal(lottie) and not Tolerable(lottie) -> Accented(lottie)\nforall x (Capricious(x) -> Submersed(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) and Soundless(x) -> not Capricious(x))\nnot Suicidal(violette) -> Soundless(violette)\n\nnot Submersed(lottie)\n\nAccented(lottie) and forall x (Accented(x) -> Suicidal(x)) -> therefore Suicidal(lottie) Suicidal(lottie) and Suicidal(lottie) -> Capricious(lottie) -> therefore Capricious(lottie) Capricious(lottie) and forall x (Capricious(x) -> Submersed(x)) -> therefore Submersed(lottie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Babette is not lowbrowed. Schuyler is not concurrent. Schuyler is meaningful. Schuyler is bounded. Schuyler is lowbrowed. Schuyler is not dextrous. Schuyler is callable. Constanta is lowbrowed. Antone is not narcotized. Antone is meaningful. If someone is lowbrowed then they are narcotized. If Constanta is narcotized then Constanta is bounded. If Constanta is narcotized and Constanta is not meaningful then Constanta is lowbrowed. All bounded people are callable. If someone is dextrous and concurrent then they are not bounded. If Schuyler is not narcotized then Schuyler is concurrent. Antone is not callable.", "logic": "\nnot Lowbrowed(babette)\nnot Concurrent(schuyler)\nMeaningful(schuyler)\nBounded(schuyler)\nLowbrowed(schuyler)\nnot Dextrous(schuyler)\nCallable(schuyler)\nLowbrowed(constanta)\nnot Narcotized(antone)\nMeaningful(antone)\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) -> Narcotized(x))\nNarcotized(constanta) -> Bounded(constanta)\nNarcotized(constanta) and not Meaningful(constanta) -> Lowbrowed(constanta)\nforall x (Bounded(x) -> Callable(x))\nforall x (Dextrous(x) and Concurrent(x) -> not Bounded(x))\nnot Narcotized(schuyler) -> Concurrent(schuyler)\n\nnot Callable(antone)\n\nforall x (Bounded(x) -> Callable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Udall is not allergic. Xaviera is not manchurian. Xaviera is jangly. Xaviera is stubborn. Xaviera is allergic. Xaviera is not monodical. Xaviera is peccable. Nara is allergic. Allen is not somatic. Allen is jangly. If someone is allergic then they are somatic. If Nara is somatic then Nara is stubborn. If Nara is somatic and Nara is not jangly then Nara is allergic. All stubborn people are peccable. If someone is monodical and manchurian then they are not stubborn. If Xaviera is not somatic then Xaviera is manchurian. Udall is somatic.", "logic": "\nnot Allergic(udall)\nnot Manchurian(xaviera)\nJangly(xaviera)\nStubborn(xaviera)\nAllergic(xaviera)\nnot Monodical(xaviera)\nPeccable(xaviera)\nAllergic(nara)\nnot Somatic(allen)\nJangly(allen)\nforall x (Allergic(x) -> Somatic(x))\nSomatic(nara) -> Stubborn(nara)\nSomatic(nara) and not Jangly(nara) -> Allergic(nara)\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Peccable(x))\nforall x (Monodical(x) and Manchurian(x) -> not Stubborn(x))\nnot Somatic(xaviera) -> Manchurian(xaviera)\n\nSomatic(udall)\n\nforall x (Allergic(x) -> Somatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Bliss is not amnic. Elijah is not congested. Elijah is wooly. Elijah is worsened. Elijah is amnic. Elijah is not clarion. Elijah is hindering. Meredeth is amnic. Tiphany is not cardboard. Tiphany is wooly. If someone is amnic then they are cardboard. If Meredeth is cardboard then Meredeth is worsened. If Meredeth is cardboard and Meredeth is not wooly then Meredeth is amnic. All worsened people are hindering. If someone is clarion and congested then they are not worsened. If Elijah is not cardboard then Elijah is congested. Bliss is not hindering.", "logic": "\nnot Amnic(bliss)\nnot Congested(elijah)\nWooly(elijah)\nWorsened(elijah)\nAmnic(elijah)\nnot Clarion(elijah)\nHindering(elijah)\nAmnic(meredeth)\nnot Cardboard(tiphany)\nWooly(tiphany)\nforall x (Amnic(x) -> Cardboard(x))\nCardboard(meredeth) -> Worsened(meredeth)\nCardboard(meredeth) and not Wooly(meredeth) -> Amnic(meredeth)\nforall x (Worsened(x) -> Hindering(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and Congested(x) -> not Worsened(x))\nnot Cardboard(elijah) -> Congested(elijah)\n\nnot Hindering(bliss)\n\nforall x (Worsened(x) -> Hindering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Daile is not rapt. Neall is not fetid. Neall is untrodden. Neall is abrupt. Neall is rapt. Neall is not undulatory. Neall is unbelted. Alwin is rapt. Conway is not unkind. Conway is untrodden. If someone is rapt then they are unkind. If Alwin is unkind then Alwin is abrupt. If Alwin is unkind and Alwin is not untrodden then Alwin is rapt. All abrupt people are unbelted. If someone is undulatory and fetid then they are not abrupt. If Neall is not unkind then Neall is fetid. Alwin is undulatory.", "logic": "\nnot Rapt(daile)\nnot Fetid(neall)\nUntrodden(neall)\nAbrupt(neall)\nRapt(neall)\nnot Undulatory(neall)\nUnbelted(neall)\nRapt(alwin)\nnot Unkind(conway)\nUntrodden(conway)\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Unkind(x))\nUnkind(alwin) -> Abrupt(alwin)\nUnkind(alwin) and not Untrodden(alwin) -> Rapt(alwin)\nforall x (Abrupt(x) -> Unbelted(x))\nforall x (Undulatory(x) and Fetid(x) -> not Abrupt(x))\nnot Unkind(neall) -> Fetid(neall)\n\nUndulatory(alwin)\n\nUndulatory(alwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Brewer is not polyatomic. Laverna is not singular. Laverna is gory. Laverna is roofed. Laverna is polyatomic. Laverna is not manageable. Laverna is flagging. Melvyn is polyatomic. Izzy is not supposable. Izzy is gory. If someone is polyatomic then they are supposable. If Melvyn is supposable then Melvyn is roofed. If Melvyn is supposable and Melvyn is not gory then Melvyn is polyatomic. All roofed people are flagging. If someone is manageable and singular then they are not roofed. If Laverna is not supposable then Laverna is singular. Izzy is not singular.", "logic": "\nnot Polyatomic(brewer)\nnot Singular(laverna)\nGory(laverna)\nRoofed(laverna)\nPolyatomic(laverna)\nnot Manageable(laverna)\nFlagging(laverna)\nPolyatomic(melvyn)\nnot Supposable(izzy)\nGory(izzy)\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Supposable(x))\nSupposable(melvyn) -> Roofed(melvyn)\nSupposable(melvyn) and not Gory(melvyn) -> Polyatomic(melvyn)\nforall x (Roofed(x) -> Flagging(x))\nforall x (Manageable(x) and Singular(x) -> not Roofed(x))\nnot Supposable(laverna) -> Singular(laverna)\n\nnot Singular(izzy)\n\nnot Singular(izzy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Morton is not quadrate. Weylin is not ulcerative. Weylin is nonsocial. Weylin is icky. Weylin is quadrate. Weylin is not deific. Weylin is insatiable. Rivi is quadrate. Cybill is not neutral. Cybill is nonsocial. If someone is quadrate then they are neutral. If Rivi is neutral then Rivi is icky. If Rivi is neutral and Rivi is not nonsocial then Rivi is quadrate. All icky people are insatiable. If someone is deific and ulcerative then they are not icky. If Weylin is not neutral then Weylin is ulcerative. Cybill is deific.", "logic": "\nnot Quadrate(morton)\nnot Ulcerative(weylin)\nNonsocial(weylin)\nIcky(weylin)\nQuadrate(weylin)\nnot Deific(weylin)\nInsatiable(weylin)\nQuadrate(rivi)\nnot Neutral(cybill)\nNonsocial(cybill)\nforall x (Quadrate(x) -> Neutral(x))\nNeutral(rivi) -> Icky(rivi)\nNeutral(rivi) and not Nonsocial(rivi) -> Quadrate(rivi)\nforall x (Icky(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Deific(x) and Ulcerative(x) -> not Icky(x))\nnot Neutral(weylin) -> Ulcerative(weylin)\n\nDeific(cybill)\n\nDeific(cybill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Jaquith is not colonial. Ward is not theist. Ward is manly. Ward is canonized. Ward is colonial. Ward is not gradatory. Ward is propulsive. Nanci is colonial. Chas is not latticed. Chas is manly. If someone is colonial then they are latticed. If Nanci is latticed then Nanci is canonized. If Nanci is latticed and Nanci is not manly then Nanci is colonial. All canonized people are propulsive. If someone is gradatory and theist then they are not canonized. If Ward is not latticed then Ward is theist. Jaquith is not manly.", "logic": "\nnot Colonial(jaquith)\nnot Theist(ward)\nManly(ward)\nCanonized(ward)\nColonial(ward)\nnot Gradatory(ward)\nPropulsive(ward)\nColonial(nanci)\nnot Latticed(chas)\nManly(chas)\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Latticed(x))\nLatticed(nanci) -> Canonized(nanci)\nLatticed(nanci) and not Manly(nanci) -> Colonial(nanci)\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Gradatory(x) and Theist(x) -> not Canonized(x))\nnot Latticed(ward) -> Theist(ward)\n\nnot Manly(jaquith)\n\nnot Manly(jaquith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Chevalier is not landless. Dottie is not pubertal. Dottie is archaean. Dottie is curst. Dottie is landless. Dottie is not execrable. Dottie is benumbed. Melvin is landless. Poul is not dismissed. Poul is archaean. If someone is landless then they are dismissed. If Melvin is dismissed then Melvin is curst. If Melvin is dismissed and Melvin is not archaean then Melvin is landless. All curst people are benumbed. If someone is execrable and pubertal then they are not curst. If Dottie is not dismissed then Dottie is pubertal. Melvin is archaean.", "logic": "\nnot Landless(chevalier)\nnot Pubertal(dottie)\nArchaean(dottie)\nCurst(dottie)\nLandless(dottie)\nnot Execrable(dottie)\nBenumbed(dottie)\nLandless(melvin)\nnot Dismissed(poul)\nArchaean(poul)\nforall x (Landless(x) -> Dismissed(x))\nDismissed(melvin) -> Curst(melvin)\nDismissed(melvin) and not Archaean(melvin) -> Landless(melvin)\nforall x (Curst(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Execrable(x) and Pubertal(x) -> not Curst(x))\nnot Dismissed(dottie) -> Pubertal(dottie)\n\nArchaean(melvin)\n\nArchaean(melvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "April is drained. April is sheeplike. April is kinglike. Smart people are not adust. If someone is drained then they are adust. If someone is adust then they are noduled. Smart, drained people are noduled. Nice, adust people are endozoan. If someone is endozoan and not adust then they are not sheeplike. April is sheeplike.", "logic": "\nDrained(april)\nSheeplike(april)\nKinglike(april)\nforall x (Dormie(x) -> not Adust(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) -> Adust(x))\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Noduled(x))\nforall x (Dormie(x) and Drained(x) -> Noduled(x))\nforall x (Noduled(x) and Adust(x) -> Endozoan(x))\nforall x (Endozoan(x) and not Adust(x) -> not Sheeplike(x))\n\nSheeplike(april)\n\ntherefore Sheeplike(april)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Harriette is sought. Harriette is colorful. Harriette is ecdemic. Smart people are not meaningful. If someone is sought then they are meaningful. If someone is meaningful then they are aortic. Smart, sought people are aortic. Nice, meaningful people are licensed. If someone is licensed and not meaningful then they are not colorful. Harriette is not colorful.", "logic": "\nSought(harriette)\nColorful(harriette)\nEcdemic(harriette)\nforall x (Illiberal(x) -> not Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Sought(x) -> Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Meaningful(x) -> Aortic(x))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) and Sought(x) -> Aortic(x))\nforall x (Aortic(x) and Meaningful(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Licensed(x) and not Meaningful(x) -> not Colorful(x))\n\nnot Colorful(harriette)\n\ntherefore Colorful(harriette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Noella is impelling. Noella is pretend. Noella is insurgent. Smart people are not discursive. If someone is impelling then they are discursive. If someone is discursive then they are antiblack. Smart, impelling people are antiblack. Nice, discursive people are xliii. If someone is xliii and not discursive then they are not pretend. Noella is discursive.", "logic": "\nImpelling(noella)\nPretend(noella)\nInsurgent(noella)\nforall x (Debile(x) -> not Discursive(x))\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> Discursive(x))\nforall x (Discursive(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nforall x (Debile(x) and Impelling(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) and Discursive(x) -> Xliii(x))\nforall x (Xliii(x) and not Discursive(x) -> not Pretend(x))\n\nDiscursive(noella)\n\nImpelling(noella) and forall x (Impelling(x) -> Discursive(x)) -> therefore Discursive(noella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Cleva is macho. Cleva is roundabout. Cleva is chanted. Smart people are not nubbly. If someone is macho then they are nubbly. If someone is nubbly then they are stabilized. Smart, macho people are stabilized. Nice, nubbly people are lendable. If someone is lendable and not nubbly then they are not roundabout. Cleva is not nubbly.", "logic": "\nMacho(cleva)\nRoundabout(cleva)\nChanted(cleva)\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> not Nubbly(x))\nforall x (Macho(x) -> Nubbly(x))\nforall x (Nubbly(x) -> Stabilized(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Macho(x) -> Stabilized(x))\nforall x (Stabilized(x) and Nubbly(x) -> Lendable(x))\nforall x (Lendable(x) and not Nubbly(x) -> not Roundabout(x))\n\nnot Nubbly(cleva)\n\nMacho(cleva) and forall x (Macho(x) -> Nubbly(x)) -> therefore Nubbly(cleva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Vic is rhombic. Vic is bigger. Vic is decorated. Smart people are not defiant. If someone is rhombic then they are defiant. If someone is defiant then they are adiabatic. Smart, rhombic people are adiabatic. Nice, defiant people are short. If someone is short and not defiant then they are not bigger. Vic is adiabatic.", "logic": "\nRhombic(vic)\nBigger(vic)\nDecorated(vic)\nforall x (Gushing(x) -> not Defiant(x))\nforall x (Rhombic(x) -> Defiant(x))\nforall x (Defiant(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Gushing(x) and Rhombic(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) and Defiant(x) -> Short(x))\nforall x (Short(x) and not Defiant(x) -> not Bigger(x))\n\nAdiabatic(vic)\n\nRhombic(vic) and forall x (Rhombic(x) -> Defiant(x)) -> therefore Defiant(vic) Defiant(vic) and forall x (Defiant(x) -> Adiabatic(x)) -> therefore Adiabatic(vic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Annora is resonant. Annora is sixteenth. Annora is particular. Smart people are not windless. If someone is resonant then they are windless. If someone is windless then they are biogenous. Smart, resonant people are biogenous. Nice, windless people are northeast. If someone is northeast and not windless then they are not sixteenth. Annora is not biogenous.", "logic": "\nResonant(annora)\nSixteenth(annora)\nParticular(annora)\nforall x (Cured(x) -> not Windless(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) -> Windless(x))\nforall x (Windless(x) -> Biogenous(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) and Resonant(x) -> Biogenous(x))\nforall x (Biogenous(x) and Windless(x) -> Northeast(x))\nforall x (Northeast(x) and not Windless(x) -> not Sixteenth(x))\n\nnot Biogenous(annora)\n\nResonant(annora) and forall x (Resonant(x) -> Windless(x)) -> therefore Windless(annora) Windless(annora) and forall x (Windless(x) -> Biogenous(x)) -> therefore Biogenous(annora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Thacher is gratifying. Thacher is drenched. Thacher is accustomed. Smart people are not salient. If someone is gratifying then they are salient. If someone is salient then they are diluted. Smart, gratifying people are diluted. Nice, salient people are anguished. If someone is anguished and not salient then they are not drenched. Thacher is anguished.", "logic": "\nGratifying(thacher)\nDrenched(thacher)\nAccustomed(thacher)\nforall x (Equivalent(x) -> not Salient(x))\nforall x (Gratifying(x) -> Salient(x))\nforall x (Salient(x) -> Diluted(x))\nforall x (Equivalent(x) and Gratifying(x) -> Diluted(x))\nforall x (Diluted(x) and Salient(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Anguished(x) and not Salient(x) -> not Drenched(x))\n\nAnguished(thacher)\n\nGratifying(thacher) and forall x (Gratifying(x) -> Salient(x)) -> therefore Salient(thacher) Salient(thacher) and forall x (Salient(x) -> Diluted(x)) -> therefore Diluted(thacher) Gratifying(thacher) and forall x (Gratifying(x) -> Salient(x)) -> therefore Salient(thacher) Diluted(thacher) and Salient(thacher) and forall x (Diluted(x) and Salient(x) -> Anguished(x)) -> therefore Anguished(thacher)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Darcie is acetabular. Darcie is unifoliate. Darcie is senecan. Smart people are not unerect. If someone is acetabular then they are unerect. If someone is unerect then they are drained. Smart, acetabular people are drained. Nice, unerect people are exogamous. If someone is exogamous and not unerect then they are not unifoliate. Darcie is not exogamous.", "logic": "\nAcetabular(darcie)\nUnifoliate(darcie)\nSenecan(darcie)\nforall x (Iridescent(x) -> not Unerect(x))\nforall x (Acetabular(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Unerect(x) -> Drained(x))\nforall x (Iridescent(x) and Acetabular(x) -> Drained(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) and Unerect(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) and not Unerect(x) -> not Unifoliate(x))\n\nnot Exogamous(darcie)\n\nAcetabular(darcie) and forall x (Acetabular(x) -> Unerect(x)) -> therefore Unerect(darcie) Unerect(darcie) and forall x (Unerect(x) -> Drained(x)) -> therefore Drained(darcie) Acetabular(darcie) and forall x (Acetabular(x) -> Unerect(x)) -> therefore Unerect(darcie) Drained(darcie) and Unerect(darcie) and forall x (Drained(x) and Unerect(x) -> Exogamous(x)) -> therefore Exogamous(darcie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Wade is fugal. Wade is syrupy. Wade is recurring. All diffused people are tantrik. If someone is diffused then they are tantrik. All tantrik people are unseasoned. All diffused, fugal people are forte. All unseasoned, forte people are recurring. If someone is fugal and recurring then they are diffused. Wade is fugal.", "logic": "\nFugal(wade)\nSyrupy(wade)\nRecurring(wade)\nforall x (Diffused(x) -> Tantrik(x))\nforall x (Diffused(x) -> Tantrik(x))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) -> Unseasoned(x))\nforall x (Diffused(x) and Fugal(x) -> Forte(x))\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) and Forte(x) -> Recurring(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) and Recurring(x) -> Diffused(x))\n\nFugal(wade)\n\ntherefore Fugal(wade)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Charmaine is painted. Charmaine is armorial. Charmaine is immoveable. All dispersed people are hangdog. If someone is dispersed then they are hangdog. All hangdog people are embolic. All dispersed, painted people are midland. All embolic, midland people are immoveable. If someone is painted and immoveable then they are dispersed. Charmaine is not immoveable.", "logic": "\nPainted(charmaine)\nArmorial(charmaine)\nImmoveable(charmaine)\nforall x (Dispersed(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Dispersed(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) -> Embolic(x))\nforall x (Dispersed(x) and Painted(x) -> Midland(x))\nforall x (Embolic(x) and Midland(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Painted(x) and Immoveable(x) -> Dispersed(x))\n\nnot Immoveable(charmaine)\n\ntherefore Immoveable(charmaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Annice is reanimated. Annice is dexterous. Annice is overaged. All crossed people are oligarchic. If someone is crossed then they are oligarchic. All oligarchic people are bullocky. All crossed, reanimated people are flawed. All bullocky, flawed people are overaged. If someone is reanimated and overaged then they are crossed. Annice is crossed.", "logic": "\nReanimated(annice)\nDexterous(annice)\nOveraged(annice)\nforall x (Crossed(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\nforall x (Crossed(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Bullocky(x))\nforall x (Crossed(x) and Reanimated(x) -> Flawed(x))\nforall x (Bullocky(x) and Flawed(x) -> Overaged(x))\nforall x (Reanimated(x) and Overaged(x) -> Crossed(x))\n\nCrossed(annice)\n\nReanimated(annice) and Overaged(annice) and forall x (Reanimated(x) and Overaged(x) -> Crossed(x)) -> therefore Crossed(annice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Rayner is negative. Rayner is frowning. Rayner is seismic. All styptic people are sixty. If someone is styptic then they are sixty. All sixty people are arawakan. All styptic, negative people are unattended. All arawakan, unattended people are seismic. If someone is negative and seismic then they are styptic. Rayner is not styptic.", "logic": "\nNegative(rayner)\nFrowning(rayner)\nSeismic(rayner)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Sixty(x))\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Sixty(x))\nforall x (Sixty(x) -> Arawakan(x))\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Negative(x) -> Unattended(x))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) and Unattended(x) -> Seismic(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) and Seismic(x) -> Styptic(x))\n\nnot Styptic(rayner)\n\nNegative(rayner) and Seismic(rayner) and forall x (Negative(x) and Seismic(x) -> Styptic(x)) -> therefore Styptic(rayner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Agnes is bowlegged. Agnes is perilous. Agnes is denatured. All autumnal people are diffident. If someone is autumnal then they are diffident. All diffident people are handmade. All autumnal, bowlegged people are vermillion. All handmade, vermillion people are denatured. If someone is bowlegged and denatured then they are autumnal. Agnes is diffident.", "logic": "\nBowlegged(agnes)\nPerilous(agnes)\nDenatured(agnes)\nforall x (Autumnal(x) -> Diffident(x))\nforall x (Autumnal(x) -> Diffident(x))\nforall x (Diffident(x) -> Handmade(x))\nforall x (Autumnal(x) and Bowlegged(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Handmade(x) and Vermillion(x) -> Denatured(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) and Denatured(x) -> Autumnal(x))\n\nDiffident(agnes)\n\nBowlegged(agnes) and Denatured(agnes) and forall x (Bowlegged(x) and Denatured(x) -> Autumnal(x)) -> therefore Autumnal(agnes) Autumnal(agnes) and forall x (Autumnal(x) -> Diffident(x)) -> therefore Diffident(agnes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Danice is gloveless. Danice is immutable. Danice is seductive. All drunken people are vague. If someone is drunken then they are vague. All vague people are carnation. All drunken, gloveless people are hermitic. All carnation, hermitic people are seductive. If someone is gloveless and seductive then they are drunken. Danice is not vague.", "logic": "\nGloveless(danice)\nImmutable(danice)\nSeductive(danice)\nforall x (Drunken(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Drunken(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) -> Carnation(x))\nforall x (Drunken(x) and Gloveless(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nforall x (Carnation(x) and Hermitic(x) -> Seductive(x))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) and Seductive(x) -> Drunken(x))\n\nnot Vague(danice)\n\nGloveless(danice) and Seductive(danice) and forall x (Gloveless(x) and Seductive(x) -> Drunken(x)) -> therefore Drunken(danice) Drunken(danice) and forall x (Drunken(x) -> Vague(x)) -> therefore Vague(danice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Avivah is uptown. Avivah is metastable. Avivah is beautiful. All sapphire people are savourless. If someone is sapphire then they are savourless. All savourless people are basic. All sapphire, uptown people are reflected. All basic, reflected people are beautiful. If someone is uptown and beautiful then they are sapphire. Avivah is basic.", "logic": "\nUptown(avivah)\nMetastable(avivah)\nBeautiful(avivah)\nforall x (Sapphire(x) -> Savourless(x))\nforall x (Sapphire(x) -> Savourless(x))\nforall x (Savourless(x) -> Basic(x))\nforall x (Sapphire(x) and Uptown(x) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Basic(x) and Reflected(x) -> Beautiful(x))\nforall x (Uptown(x) and Beautiful(x) -> Sapphire(x))\n\nBasic(avivah)\n\nUptown(avivah) and Beautiful(avivah) and forall x (Uptown(x) and Beautiful(x) -> Sapphire(x)) -> therefore Sapphire(avivah) Sapphire(avivah) and forall x (Sapphire(x) -> Savourless(x)) -> therefore Savourless(avivah) Savourless(avivah) and forall x (Savourless(x) -> Basic(x)) -> therefore Basic(avivah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Lilian is bilocular. Lilian is ictal. Lilian is deranged. All speaking people are wonky. If someone is speaking then they are wonky. All wonky people are undomestic. All speaking, bilocular people are spruce. All undomestic, spruce people are deranged. If someone is bilocular and deranged then they are speaking. Lilian is not undomestic.", "logic": "\nBilocular(lilian)\nIctal(lilian)\nDeranged(lilian)\nforall x (Speaking(x) -> Wonky(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) -> Wonky(x))\nforall x (Wonky(x) -> Undomestic(x))\nforall x (Speaking(x) and Bilocular(x) -> Spruce(x))\nforall x (Undomestic(x) and Spruce(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Bilocular(x) and Deranged(x) -> Speaking(x))\n\nnot Undomestic(lilian)\n\nBilocular(lilian) and Deranged(lilian) and forall x (Bilocular(x) and Deranged(x) -> Speaking(x)) -> therefore Speaking(lilian) Speaking(lilian) and forall x (Speaking(x) -> Wonky(x)) -> therefore Wonky(lilian) Wonky(lilian) and forall x (Wonky(x) -> Undomestic(x)) -> therefore Undomestic(lilian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Cecily is ablaze. Cecily is postal. Cecily is trivalent. Bell is maniac. Carly is chian. Beilul is mithraic. Beilul is maniac. Beilul is ablaze. Beilul is upbound. Beilul is trivalent. If someone is maniac and ablaze then they are chian. If someone is mithraic then they are maniac. All ablaze people are mithraic. All upbound, mithraic people are ablaze. If someone is trivalent then they are postal. All upbound people are trivalent. Cecily is postal.", "logic": "\nAblaze(cecily)\nPostal(cecily)\nTrivalent(cecily)\nManiac(bell)\nChian(carly)\nMithraic(beilul)\nManiac(beilul)\nAblaze(beilul)\nUpbound(beilul)\nTrivalent(beilul)\nforall x (Maniac(x) and Ablaze(x) -> Chian(x))\nforall x (Mithraic(x) -> Maniac(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) and Mithraic(x) -> Ablaze(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) -> Postal(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Trivalent(x))\n\nPostal(cecily)\n\ntherefore Postal(cecily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Devin is hardcore. Devin is boughten. Devin is shelfy. Nannie is blastemic. Jazmin is decorated. Roanna is cornered. Roanna is blastemic. Roanna is hardcore. Roanna is sitting. Roanna is shelfy. If someone is blastemic and hardcore then they are decorated. If someone is cornered then they are blastemic. All hardcore people are cornered. All sitting, cornered people are hardcore. If someone is shelfy then they are boughten. All sitting people are shelfy. Nannie is not blastemic.", "logic": "\nHardcore(devin)\nBoughten(devin)\nShelfy(devin)\nBlastemic(nannie)\nDecorated(jazmin)\nCornered(roanna)\nBlastemic(roanna)\nHardcore(roanna)\nSitting(roanna)\nShelfy(roanna)\nforall x (Blastemic(x) and Hardcore(x) -> Decorated(x))\nforall x (Cornered(x) -> Blastemic(x))\nforall x (Hardcore(x) -> Cornered(x))\nforall x (Sitting(x) and Cornered(x) -> Hardcore(x))\nforall x (Shelfy(x) -> Boughten(x))\nforall x (Sitting(x) -> Shelfy(x))\n\nnot Blastemic(nannie)\n\ntherefore Blastemic(nannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Walt is turkic. Walt is societal. Walt is arteriolar. Arlo is stupendous. Maure is inertial. Tomlin is laudable. Tomlin is stupendous. Tomlin is turkic. Tomlin is bantoid. Tomlin is arteriolar. If someone is stupendous and turkic then they are inertial. If someone is laudable then they are stupendous. All turkic people are laudable. All bantoid, laudable people are turkic. If someone is arteriolar then they are societal. All bantoid people are arteriolar. Walt is laudable.", "logic": "\nTurkic(walt)\nSocietal(walt)\nArteriolar(walt)\nStupendous(arlo)\nInertial(maure)\nLaudable(tomlin)\nStupendous(tomlin)\nTurkic(tomlin)\nBantoid(tomlin)\nArteriolar(tomlin)\nforall x (Stupendous(x) and Turkic(x) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Stupendous(x))\nforall x (Turkic(x) -> Laudable(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) and Laudable(x) -> Turkic(x))\nforall x (Arteriolar(x) -> Societal(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\n\nLaudable(walt)\n\nTurkic(walt) and forall x (Turkic(x) -> Laudable(x)) -> therefore Laudable(walt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Hewie is small. Hewie is bicornuous. Hewie is western. Isabelle is dickensian. Barnabe is admonitory. Wilbur is unnamed. Wilbur is dickensian. Wilbur is small. Wilbur is decollete. Wilbur is western. If someone is dickensian and small then they are admonitory. If someone is unnamed then they are dickensian. All small people are unnamed. All decollete, unnamed people are small. If someone is western then they are bicornuous. All decollete people are western. Hewie is not unnamed.", "logic": "\nSmall(hewie)\nBicornuous(hewie)\nWestern(hewie)\nDickensian(isabelle)\nAdmonitory(barnabe)\nUnnamed(wilbur)\nDickensian(wilbur)\nSmall(wilbur)\nDecollete(wilbur)\nWestern(wilbur)\nforall x (Dickensian(x) and Small(x) -> Admonitory(x))\nforall x (Unnamed(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Small(x) -> Unnamed(x))\nforall x (Decollete(x) and Unnamed(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Western(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Decollete(x) -> Western(x))\n\nnot Unnamed(hewie)\n\nSmall(hewie) and forall x (Small(x) -> Unnamed(x)) -> therefore Unnamed(hewie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Lillian is governing. Lillian is clausal. Lillian is unpitying. Penelopa is patchy. Minny is hammy. Gusty is unposed. Gusty is patchy. Gusty is governing. Gusty is volute. Gusty is unpitying. If someone is patchy and governing then they are hammy. If someone is unposed then they are patchy. All governing people are unposed. All volute, unposed people are governing. If someone is unpitying then they are clausal. All volute people are unpitying. Lillian is patchy.", "logic": "\nGoverning(lillian)\nClausal(lillian)\nUnpitying(lillian)\nPatchy(penelopa)\nHammy(minny)\nUnposed(gusty)\nPatchy(gusty)\nGoverning(gusty)\nVolute(gusty)\nUnpitying(gusty)\nforall x (Patchy(x) and Governing(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Patchy(x))\nforall x (Governing(x) -> Unposed(x))\nforall x (Volute(x) and Unposed(x) -> Governing(x))\nforall x (Unpitying(x) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Volute(x) -> Unpitying(x))\n\nPatchy(lillian)\n\nGoverning(lillian) and forall x (Governing(x) -> Unposed(x)) -> therefore Unposed(lillian) Unposed(lillian) and forall x (Unposed(x) -> Patchy(x)) -> therefore Patchy(lillian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Durward is synchronal. Durward is stalinist. Durward is neapolitan. Othello is agonized. Ransom is demanding. Darren is squeamish. Darren is agonized. Darren is synchronal. Darren is incurved. Darren is neapolitan. If someone is agonized and synchronal then they are demanding. If someone is squeamish then they are agonized. All synchronal people are squeamish. All incurved, squeamish people are synchronal. If someone is neapolitan then they are stalinist. All incurved people are neapolitan. Durward is not agonized.", "logic": "\nSynchronal(durward)\nStalinist(durward)\nNeapolitan(durward)\nAgonized(othello)\nDemanding(ransom)\nSqueamish(darren)\nAgonized(darren)\nSynchronal(darren)\nIncurved(darren)\nNeapolitan(darren)\nforall x (Agonized(x) and Synchronal(x) -> Demanding(x))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) -> Agonized(x))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Squeamish(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) and Squeamish(x) -> Synchronal(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Stalinist(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\n\nnot Agonized(durward)\n\nSynchronal(durward) and forall x (Synchronal(x) -> Squeamish(x)) -> therefore Squeamish(durward) Squeamish(durward) and forall x (Squeamish(x) -> Agonized(x)) -> therefore Agonized(durward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Vic is according. Vic is symbiotic. Vic is ranked. Theda is uncharged. Caitrin is offensive. Eada is gluey. Eada is uncharged. Eada is according. Eada is highland. Eada is ranked. If someone is uncharged and according then they are offensive. If someone is gluey then they are uncharged. All according people are gluey. All highland, gluey people are according. If someone is ranked then they are symbiotic. All highland people are ranked. Vic is offensive.", "logic": "\nAccording(vic)\nSymbiotic(vic)\nRanked(vic)\nUncharged(theda)\nOffensive(caitrin)\nGluey(eada)\nUncharged(eada)\nAccording(eada)\nHighland(eada)\nRanked(eada)\nforall x (Uncharged(x) and According(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Gluey(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (According(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) and Gluey(x) -> According(x))\nforall x (Ranked(x) -> Symbiotic(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Ranked(x))\n\nOffensive(vic)\n\nAccording(vic) and forall x (According(x) -> Gluey(x)) -> therefore Gluey(vic) Gluey(vic) and forall x (Gluey(x) -> Uncharged(x)) -> therefore Uncharged(vic) Uncharged(vic) and According(vic) and forall x (Uncharged(x) and According(x) -> Offensive(x)) -> therefore Offensive(vic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Natala is laughable. Natala is rotatory. Natala is collusive. Krishna is studied. Sibyl is lxxvi. Sherwin is starred. Sherwin is studied. Sherwin is laughable. Sherwin is peaky. Sherwin is collusive. If someone is studied and laughable then they are lxxvi. If someone is starred then they are studied. All laughable people are starred. All peaky, starred people are laughable. If someone is collusive then they are rotatory. All peaky people are collusive. Natala is not lxxvi.", "logic": "\nLaughable(natala)\nRotatory(natala)\nCollusive(natala)\nStudied(krishna)\nLxxvi(sibyl)\nStarred(sherwin)\nStudied(sherwin)\nLaughable(sherwin)\nPeaky(sherwin)\nCollusive(sherwin)\nforall x (Studied(x) and Laughable(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Starred(x) -> Studied(x))\nforall x (Laughable(x) -> Starred(x))\nforall x (Peaky(x) and Starred(x) -> Laughable(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Rotatory(x))\nforall x (Peaky(x) -> Collusive(x))\n\nnot Lxxvi(natala)\n\nLaughable(natala) and forall x (Laughable(x) -> Starred(x)) -> therefore Starred(natala) Starred(natala) and forall x (Starred(x) -> Studied(x)) -> therefore Studied(natala) Studied(natala) and Laughable(natala) and forall x (Studied(x) and Laughable(x) -> Lxxvi(x)) -> therefore Lxxvi(natala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Wanda is ferial. Wanda is unclaimed. Wanda is spanish. Brandea is formal. Lauraine is bifid. Amalita is anoxic. Amalita is formal. Amalita is ferial. Amalita is unromantic. Amalita is spanish. If someone is formal and ferial then they are bifid. If someone is anoxic then they are formal. All ferial people are anoxic. All unromantic, anoxic people are ferial. If someone is spanish then they are unclaimed. All unromantic people are spanish. Brandea is not ferial.", "logic": "\nFerial(wanda)\nUnclaimed(wanda)\nSpanish(wanda)\nFormal(brandea)\nBifid(lauraine)\nAnoxic(amalita)\nFormal(amalita)\nFerial(amalita)\nUnromantic(amalita)\nSpanish(amalita)\nforall x (Formal(x) and Ferial(x) -> Bifid(x))\nforall x (Anoxic(x) -> Formal(x))\nforall x (Ferial(x) -> Anoxic(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) and Anoxic(x) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Spanish(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Spanish(x))\n\nnot Ferial(brandea)\n\nforall x (Unromantic(x) and Anoxic(x) -> Ferial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Candi is precious. Candi is abused. Candi is razed. Elisa is full. Kaiser is bogus. Rodolphe is sleety. Rodolphe is full. Rodolphe is precious. Rodolphe is disarming. Rodolphe is razed. If someone is full and precious then they are bogus. If someone is sleety then they are full. All precious people are sleety. All disarming, sleety people are precious. If someone is razed then they are abused. All disarming people are razed. Elisa is razed.", "logic": "\nPrecious(candi)\nAbused(candi)\nRazed(candi)\nFull(elisa)\nBogus(kaiser)\nSleety(rodolphe)\nFull(rodolphe)\nPrecious(rodolphe)\nDisarming(rodolphe)\nRazed(rodolphe)\nforall x (Full(x) and Precious(x) -> Bogus(x))\nforall x (Sleety(x) -> Full(x))\nforall x (Precious(x) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) and Sleety(x) -> Precious(x))\nforall x (Razed(x) -> Abused(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Razed(x))\n\nRazed(elisa)\n\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Razed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Mignon is ochre. Mignon is unlighted. Mignon is wrinkly. Sephira is nonrandom. Antone is disastrous. Salmon is eulogistic. Salmon is nonrandom. Salmon is ochre. Salmon is sabine. Salmon is wrinkly. If someone is nonrandom and ochre then they are disastrous. If someone is eulogistic then they are nonrandom. All ochre people are eulogistic. All sabine, eulogistic people are ochre. If someone is wrinkly then they are unlighted. All sabine people are wrinkly. Antone is not nonrandom.", "logic": "\nOchre(mignon)\nUnlighted(mignon)\nWrinkly(mignon)\nNonrandom(sephira)\nDisastrous(antone)\nEulogistic(salmon)\nNonrandom(salmon)\nOchre(salmon)\nSabine(salmon)\nWrinkly(salmon)\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and Ochre(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) -> Nonrandom(x))\nforall x (Ochre(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\nforall x (Sabine(x) and Eulogistic(x) -> Ochre(x))\nforall x (Wrinkly(x) -> Unlighted(x))\nforall x (Sabine(x) -> Wrinkly(x))\n\nnot Nonrandom(antone)\n\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) -> Nonrandom(x)) <- forall x (Ochre(x) -> Eulogistic(x)) <- forall x (Sabine(x) and Eulogistic(x) -> Ochre(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Fawnia is hierarchic. Fawnia is depressed. Fawnia is unshoed. Maryrose is leering. Warden is credible. Robb is raddled. Robb is leering. Robb is hierarchic. Robb is deist. Robb is unshoed. If someone is leering and hierarchic then they are credible. If someone is raddled then they are leering. All hierarchic people are raddled. All deist, raddled people are hierarchic. If someone is unshoed then they are depressed. All deist people are unshoed. Maryrose is credible.", "logic": "\nHierarchic(fawnia)\nDepressed(fawnia)\nUnshoed(fawnia)\nLeering(maryrose)\nCredible(warden)\nRaddled(robb)\nLeering(robb)\nHierarchic(robb)\nDeist(robb)\nUnshoed(robb)\nforall x (Leering(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Raddled(x) -> Leering(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Deist(x) and Raddled(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Deist(x) -> Unshoed(x))\n\nCredible(maryrose)\n\nforall x (Leering(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> Credible(x)) <- forall x (Deist(x) and Raddled(x) -> Hierarchic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Johnathon is hierarchic. Johnathon is elicited. Johnathon is milch. Charmion is retiring. Ellene is expurgated. Irene is adopted. Irene is retiring. Irene is hierarchic. Irene is shamefaced. Irene is milch. If someone is retiring and hierarchic then they are expurgated. If someone is adopted then they are retiring. All hierarchic people are adopted. All shamefaced, adopted people are hierarchic. If someone is milch then they are elicited. All shamefaced people are milch. Ellene is not shamefaced.", "logic": "\nHierarchic(johnathon)\nElicited(johnathon)\nMilch(johnathon)\nRetiring(charmion)\nExpurgated(ellene)\nAdopted(irene)\nRetiring(irene)\nHierarchic(irene)\nShamefaced(irene)\nMilch(irene)\nforall x (Retiring(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> Expurgated(x))\nforall x (Adopted(x) -> Retiring(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) -> Adopted(x))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and Adopted(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\nforall x (Milch(x) -> Elicited(x))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) -> Milch(x))\n\nnot Shamefaced(ellene)\n\nnot Shamefaced(ellene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Pattie is singhalese. Pattie is squinty. Pattie is curling. Floria is unchecked. Maddi is blasted. Saunders is unreformed. Saunders is unchecked. Saunders is singhalese. Saunders is medullated. Saunders is curling. If someone is unchecked and singhalese then they are blasted. If someone is unreformed then they are unchecked. All singhalese people are unreformed. All medullated, unreformed people are singhalese. If someone is curling then they are squinty. All medullated people are curling. Pattie is medullated.", "logic": "\nSinghalese(pattie)\nSquinty(pattie)\nCurling(pattie)\nUnchecked(floria)\nBlasted(maddi)\nUnreformed(saunders)\nUnchecked(saunders)\nSinghalese(saunders)\nMedullated(saunders)\nCurling(saunders)\nforall x (Unchecked(x) and Singhalese(x) -> Blasted(x))\nforall x (Unreformed(x) -> Unchecked(x))\nforall x (Singhalese(x) -> Unreformed(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) and Unreformed(x) -> Singhalese(x))\nforall x (Curling(x) -> Squinty(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Curling(x))\n\nMedullated(pattie)\n\nMedullated(pattie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "The halvard knot the bree. The halvard terrasse the demeter. The demeter is ablaze. The demeter mock the bree. The demeter knot the halvard. The demeter terrasse the peg. The demeter terrasse the bree. The peg is haitian. The peg is somnific. The peg knot the halvard. The peg knot the demeter. The peg terrasse the demeter. The bree mock the peg. The bree knot the halvard. The bree terrasse the demeter. If something mock the halvard then it terrasse the peg. If something mock the bree then the bree mock the halvard. If the bree terrasse the peg then the bree knot the peg. If something is somnific and it mock the demeter then it is borated. If something mock the bree and the bree knot the halvard then the bree is hygienical. If the demeter terrasse the peg and the demeter mock the bree then the demeter is haitian. The bree knot the halvard.", "logic": "\nKnot(halvard, bree)\nTerrasse(halvard, demeter)\nAblaze(demeter)\nMock(demeter, bree)\nKnot(demeter, halvard)\nTerrasse(demeter, peg)\nTerrasse(demeter, bree)\nHaitian(peg)\nSomnific(peg)\nKnot(peg, halvard)\nKnot(peg, demeter)\nTerrasse(peg, demeter)\nMock(bree, peg)\nKnot(bree, halvard)\nTerrasse(bree, demeter)\nforall x (Mock(x, halvard) -> Terrasse(x, peg))\nforall x (Mock(x, bree) -> Mock(bree, halvard))\nTerrasse(bree, peg) -> Knot(bree, peg)\nforall x (Somnific(x) and Mock(x, demeter) -> Borated(x))\nforall x (Mock(x, bree) and Knot(bree, halvard) -> Hygienical(bree))\nTerrasse(demeter, peg) and Mock(demeter, bree) -> Haitian(demeter)\n\nKnot(bree, halvard)\n\ntherefore Knot(bree, halvard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The tootsie interbreed the pieter. The tootsie reconfirm the cleva. The cleva is nitid. The cleva exploit the pieter. The cleva interbreed the tootsie. The cleva reconfirm the nealson. The cleva reconfirm the pieter. The nealson is conical. The nealson is tasty. The nealson interbreed the tootsie. The nealson interbreed the cleva. The nealson reconfirm the cleva. The pieter exploit the nealson. The pieter interbreed the tootsie. The pieter reconfirm the cleva. If something exploit the tootsie then it reconfirm the nealson. If something exploit the pieter then the pieter exploit the tootsie. If the pieter reconfirm the nealson then the pieter interbreed the nealson. If something is tasty and it exploit the cleva then it is flagging. If something exploit the pieter and the pieter interbreed the tootsie then the pieter is alpha. If the cleva reconfirm the nealson and the cleva exploit the pieter then the cleva is conical. The cleva does not see the tootsie.", "logic": "\nInterbreed(tootsie, pieter)\nReconfirm(tootsie, cleva)\nNitid(cleva)\nExploit(cleva, pieter)\nInterbreed(cleva, tootsie)\nReconfirm(cleva, nealson)\nReconfirm(cleva, pieter)\nConical(nealson)\nTasty(nealson)\nInterbreed(nealson, tootsie)\nInterbreed(nealson, cleva)\nReconfirm(nealson, cleva)\nExploit(pieter, nealson)\nInterbreed(pieter, tootsie)\nReconfirm(pieter, cleva)\nforall x (Exploit(x, tootsie) -> Reconfirm(x, nealson))\nforall x (Exploit(x, pieter) -> Exploit(pieter, tootsie))\nReconfirm(pieter, nealson) -> Interbreed(pieter, nealson)\nforall x (Tasty(x) and Exploit(x, cleva) -> Flagging(x))\nforall x (Exploit(x, pieter) and Interbreed(pieter, tootsie) -> Alpha(pieter))\nReconfirm(cleva, nealson) and Exploit(cleva, pieter) -> Conical(cleva)\n\nnot Interbreed(cleva, tootsie)\n\ntherefore Interbreed(cleva, tootsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The durante divulge the gizela. The durante spark the marshall. The marshall is twinkly. The marshall relay the gizela. The marshall divulge the durante. The marshall spark the gearard. The marshall spark the gizela. The gearard is forced. The gearard is huffy. The gearard divulge the durante. The gearard divulge the marshall. The gearard spark the marshall. The gizela relay the gearard. The gizela divulge the durante. The gizela spark the marshall. If something relay the durante then it spark the gearard. If something relay the gizela then the gizela relay the durante. If the gizela spark the gearard then the gizela divulge the gearard. If something is huffy and it relay the marshall then it is mesolithic. If something relay the gizela and the gizela divulge the durante then the gizela is mottled. If the marshall spark the gearard and the marshall relay the gizela then the marshall is forced. The gizela is mottled.", "logic": "\nDivulge(durante, gizela)\nSpark(durante, marshall)\nTwinkly(marshall)\nRelay(marshall, gizela)\nDivulge(marshall, durante)\nSpark(marshall, gearard)\nSpark(marshall, gizela)\nForced(gearard)\nHuffy(gearard)\nDivulge(gearard, durante)\nDivulge(gearard, marshall)\nSpark(gearard, marshall)\nRelay(gizela, gearard)\nDivulge(gizela, durante)\nSpark(gizela, marshall)\nforall x (Relay(x, durante) -> Spark(x, gearard))\nforall x (Relay(x, gizela) -> Relay(gizela, durante))\nSpark(gizela, gearard) -> Divulge(gizela, gearard)\nforall x (Huffy(x) and Relay(x, marshall) -> Mesolithic(x))\nforall x (Relay(x, gizela) and Divulge(gizela, durante) -> Mottled(gizela))\nSpark(marshall, gearard) and Relay(marshall, gizela) -> Forced(marshall)\n\nMottled(gizela)\n\nRelay(marshall, gizela) and Divulge(gizela, durante) and forall x (Relay(x, gizela) and Divulge(gizela, durante) -> Mottled(gizela)) -> therefore Mottled(gizela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The linnie displume the lianna. The linnie raze the arlie. The arlie is cupulate. The arlie jingle the lianna. The arlie displume the linnie. The arlie raze the roxana. The arlie raze the lianna. The roxana is unkindly. The roxana is subjacent. The roxana displume the linnie. The roxana displume the arlie. The roxana raze the arlie. The lianna jingle the roxana. The lianna displume the linnie. The lianna raze the arlie. If something jingle the linnie then it raze the roxana. If something jingle the lianna then the lianna jingle the linnie. If the lianna raze the roxana then the lianna displume the roxana. If something is subjacent and it jingle the arlie then it is corneal. If something jingle the lianna and the lianna displume the linnie then the lianna is tubercular. If the arlie raze the roxana and the arlie jingle the lianna then the arlie is unkindly. The lianna is not tubercular.", "logic": "\nDisplume(linnie, lianna)\nRaze(linnie, arlie)\nCupulate(arlie)\nJingle(arlie, lianna)\nDisplume(arlie, linnie)\nRaze(arlie, roxana)\nRaze(arlie, lianna)\nUnkindly(roxana)\nSubjacent(roxana)\nDisplume(roxana, linnie)\nDisplume(roxana, arlie)\nRaze(roxana, arlie)\nJingle(lianna, roxana)\nDisplume(lianna, linnie)\nRaze(lianna, arlie)\nforall x (Jingle(x, linnie) -> Raze(x, roxana))\nforall x (Jingle(x, lianna) -> Jingle(lianna, linnie))\nRaze(lianna, roxana) -> Displume(lianna, roxana)\nforall x (Subjacent(x) and Jingle(x, arlie) -> Corneal(x))\nforall x (Jingle(x, lianna) and Displume(lianna, linnie) -> Tubercular(lianna))\nRaze(arlie, roxana) and Jingle(arlie, lianna) -> Unkindly(arlie)\n\nnot Tubercular(lianna)\n\nJingle(arlie, lianna) and Displume(lianna, linnie) and forall x (Jingle(x, lianna) and Displume(lianna, linnie) -> Tubercular(lianna)) -> therefore Tubercular(lianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The bjorn gull the katharyn. The bjorn dandify the adolf. The adolf is sensate. The adolf flare the katharyn. The adolf gull the bjorn. The adolf dandify the linus. The adolf dandify the katharyn. The linus is suboceanic. The linus is practiced. The linus gull the bjorn. The linus gull the adolf. The linus dandify the adolf. The katharyn flare the linus. The katharyn gull the bjorn. The katharyn dandify the adolf. If something flare the bjorn then it dandify the linus. If something flare the katharyn then the katharyn flare the bjorn. If the katharyn dandify the linus then the katharyn gull the linus. If something is practiced and it flare the adolf then it is offside. If something flare the katharyn and the katharyn gull the bjorn then the katharyn is gregorian. If the adolf dandify the linus and the adolf flare the katharyn then the adolf is suboceanic. The katharyn dandify the linus.", "logic": "\nGull(bjorn, katharyn)\nDandify(bjorn, adolf)\nSensate(adolf)\nFlare(adolf, katharyn)\nGull(adolf, bjorn)\nDandify(adolf, linus)\nDandify(adolf, katharyn)\nSuboceanic(linus)\nPracticed(linus)\nGull(linus, bjorn)\nGull(linus, adolf)\nDandify(linus, adolf)\nFlare(katharyn, linus)\nGull(katharyn, bjorn)\nDandify(katharyn, adolf)\nforall x (Flare(x, bjorn) -> Dandify(x, linus))\nforall x (Flare(x, katharyn) -> Flare(katharyn, bjorn))\nDandify(katharyn, linus) -> Gull(katharyn, linus)\nforall x (Practiced(x) and Flare(x, adolf) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Flare(x, katharyn) and Gull(katharyn, bjorn) -> Gregorian(katharyn))\nDandify(adolf, linus) and Flare(adolf, katharyn) -> Suboceanic(adolf)\n\nDandify(katharyn, linus)\n\nFlare(adolf, katharyn) and forall x (Flare(x, katharyn) -> Flare(katharyn, bjorn)) -> therefore Flare(katharyn, bjorn) Flare(katharyn, bjorn) and forall x (Flare(x, bjorn) -> Dandify(x, linus)) -> therefore Dandify(katharyn, linus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The donna deterge the zonnya. The donna buff the elsi. The elsi is behind. The elsi aerate the zonnya. The elsi deterge the donna. The elsi buff the aloise. The elsi buff the zonnya. The aloise is unwanted. The aloise is epiphytic. The aloise deterge the donna. The aloise deterge the elsi. The aloise buff the elsi. The zonnya aerate the aloise. The zonnya deterge the donna. The zonnya buff the elsi. If something aerate the donna then it buff the aloise. If something aerate the zonnya then the zonnya aerate the donna. If the zonnya buff the aloise then the zonnya deterge the aloise. If something is epiphytic and it aerate the elsi then it is hypnagogic. If something aerate the zonnya and the zonnya deterge the donna then the zonnya is frightful. If the elsi buff the aloise and the elsi aerate the zonnya then the elsi is unwanted. The zonnya does not visit the aloise.", "logic": "\nDeterge(donna, zonnya)\nBuff(donna, elsi)\nBehind(elsi)\nAerate(elsi, zonnya)\nDeterge(elsi, donna)\nBuff(elsi, aloise)\nBuff(elsi, zonnya)\nUnwanted(aloise)\nEpiphytic(aloise)\nDeterge(aloise, donna)\nDeterge(aloise, elsi)\nBuff(aloise, elsi)\nAerate(zonnya, aloise)\nDeterge(zonnya, donna)\nBuff(zonnya, elsi)\nforall x (Aerate(x, donna) -> Buff(x, aloise))\nforall x (Aerate(x, zonnya) -> Aerate(zonnya, donna))\nBuff(zonnya, aloise) -> Deterge(zonnya, aloise)\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) and Aerate(x, elsi) -> Hypnagogic(x))\nforall x (Aerate(x, zonnya) and Deterge(zonnya, donna) -> Frightful(zonnya))\nBuff(elsi, aloise) and Aerate(elsi, zonnya) -> Unwanted(elsi)\n\nnot Buff(zonnya, aloise)\n\nAerate(elsi, zonnya) and forall x (Aerate(x, zonnya) -> Aerate(zonnya, donna)) -> therefore Aerate(zonnya, donna) Aerate(zonnya, donna) and forall x (Aerate(x, donna) -> Buff(x, aloise)) -> therefore Buff(zonnya, aloise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The arnold tope the petra. The arnold emulsify the brinkley. The brinkley is crapulous. The brinkley emplace the petra. The brinkley tope the arnold. The brinkley emulsify the eudora. The brinkley emulsify the petra. The eudora is teal. The eudora is autonomic. The eudora tope the arnold. The eudora tope the brinkley. The eudora emulsify the brinkley. The petra emplace the eudora. The petra tope the arnold. The petra emulsify the brinkley. If something emplace the arnold then it emulsify the eudora. If something emplace the petra then the petra emplace the arnold. If the petra emulsify the eudora then the petra tope the eudora. If something is autonomic and it emplace the brinkley then it is chaetal. If something emplace the petra and the petra tope the arnold then the petra is autogamous. If the brinkley emulsify the eudora and the brinkley emplace the petra then the brinkley is teal. The petra tope the eudora.", "logic": "\nTope(arnold, petra)\nEmulsify(arnold, brinkley)\nCrapulous(brinkley)\nEmplace(brinkley, petra)\nTope(brinkley, arnold)\nEmulsify(brinkley, eudora)\nEmulsify(brinkley, petra)\nTeal(eudora)\nAutonomic(eudora)\nTope(eudora, arnold)\nTope(eudora, brinkley)\nEmulsify(eudora, brinkley)\nEmplace(petra, eudora)\nTope(petra, arnold)\nEmulsify(petra, brinkley)\nforall x (Emplace(x, arnold) -> Emulsify(x, eudora))\nforall x (Emplace(x, petra) -> Emplace(petra, arnold))\nEmulsify(petra, eudora) -> Tope(petra, eudora)\nforall x (Autonomic(x) and Emplace(x, brinkley) -> Chaetal(x))\nforall x (Emplace(x, petra) and Tope(petra, arnold) -> Autogamous(petra))\nEmulsify(brinkley, eudora) and Emplace(brinkley, petra) -> Teal(brinkley)\n\nTope(petra, eudora)\n\nEmplace(brinkley, petra) and forall x (Emplace(x, petra) -> Emplace(petra, arnold)) -> therefore Emplace(petra, arnold) Emplace(petra, arnold) and forall x (Emplace(x, arnold) -> Emulsify(x, eudora)) -> therefore Emulsify(petra, eudora) Emulsify(petra, eudora) and Emulsify(petra, eudora) -> Tope(petra, eudora) -> therefore Tope(petra, eudora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The allissa kneel the alicea. The allissa asphalt the kania. The kania is gastric. The kania ransom the alicea. The kania kneel the allissa. The kania asphalt the odette. The kania asphalt the alicea. The odette is amalgamate. The odette is enteric. The odette kneel the allissa. The odette kneel the kania. The odette asphalt the kania. The alicea ransom the odette. The alicea kneel the allissa. The alicea asphalt the kania. If something ransom the allissa then it asphalt the odette. If something ransom the alicea then the alicea ransom the allissa. If the alicea asphalt the odette then the alicea kneel the odette. If something is enteric and it ransom the kania then it is sunburned. If something ransom the alicea and the alicea kneel the allissa then the alicea is figured. If the kania asphalt the odette and the kania ransom the alicea then the kania is amalgamate. The alicea does not see the odette.", "logic": "\nKneel(allissa, alicea)\nAsphalt(allissa, kania)\nGastric(kania)\nRansom(kania, alicea)\nKneel(kania, allissa)\nAsphalt(kania, odette)\nAsphalt(kania, alicea)\nAmalgamate(odette)\nEnteric(odette)\nKneel(odette, allissa)\nKneel(odette, kania)\nAsphalt(odette, kania)\nRansom(alicea, odette)\nKneel(alicea, allissa)\nAsphalt(alicea, kania)\nforall x (Ransom(x, allissa) -> Asphalt(x, odette))\nforall x (Ransom(x, alicea) -> Ransom(alicea, allissa))\nAsphalt(alicea, odette) -> Kneel(alicea, odette)\nforall x (Enteric(x) and Ransom(x, kania) -> Sunburned(x))\nforall x (Ransom(x, alicea) and Kneel(alicea, allissa) -> Figured(alicea))\nAsphalt(kania, odette) and Ransom(kania, alicea) -> Amalgamate(kania)\n\nnot Kneel(alicea, odette)\n\nRansom(kania, alicea) and forall x (Ransom(x, alicea) -> Ransom(alicea, allissa)) -> therefore Ransom(alicea, allissa) Ransom(alicea, allissa) and forall x (Ransom(x, allissa) -> Asphalt(x, odette)) -> therefore Asphalt(alicea, odette) Asphalt(alicea, odette) and Asphalt(alicea, odette) -> Kneel(alicea, odette) -> therefore Kneel(alicea, odette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The lisandra malign the leia. The lisandra cotton the harris. The harris is aboral. The harris descale the leia. The harris malign the lisandra. The harris cotton the fonzie. The harris cotton the leia. The fonzie is excellent. The fonzie is sheltered. The fonzie malign the lisandra. The fonzie malign the harris. The fonzie cotton the harris. The leia descale the fonzie. The leia malign the lisandra. The leia cotton the harris. If something descale the lisandra then it cotton the fonzie. If something descale the leia then the leia descale the lisandra. If the leia cotton the fonzie then the leia malign the fonzie. If something is sheltered and it descale the harris then it is decorated. If something descale the leia and the leia malign the lisandra then the leia is euphonous. If the harris cotton the fonzie and the harris descale the leia then the harris is excellent. The lisandra is not decorated.", "logic": "\nMalign(lisandra, leia)\nCotton(lisandra, harris)\nAboral(harris)\nDescale(harris, leia)\nMalign(harris, lisandra)\nCotton(harris, fonzie)\nCotton(harris, leia)\nExcellent(fonzie)\nSheltered(fonzie)\nMalign(fonzie, lisandra)\nMalign(fonzie, harris)\nCotton(fonzie, harris)\nDescale(leia, fonzie)\nMalign(leia, lisandra)\nCotton(leia, harris)\nforall x (Descale(x, lisandra) -> Cotton(x, fonzie))\nforall x (Descale(x, leia) -> Descale(leia, lisandra))\nCotton(leia, fonzie) -> Malign(leia, fonzie)\nforall x (Sheltered(x) and Descale(x, harris) -> Decorated(x))\nforall x (Descale(x, leia) and Malign(leia, lisandra) -> Euphonous(leia))\nCotton(harris, fonzie) and Descale(harris, leia) -> Excellent(harris)\n\nnot Decorated(lisandra)\n\nforall x (Sheltered(x) and Descale(x, harris) -> Decorated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The mala overjoy the warren. The mala misconduct the jaynell. The jaynell is fascinated. The jaynell withstand the warren. The jaynell overjoy the mala. The jaynell misconduct the rose. The jaynell misconduct the warren. The rose is spirited. The rose is proto. The rose overjoy the mala. The rose overjoy the jaynell. The rose misconduct the jaynell. The warren withstand the rose. The warren overjoy the mala. The warren misconduct the jaynell. If something withstand the mala then it misconduct the rose. If something withstand the warren then the warren withstand the mala. If the warren misconduct the rose then the warren overjoy the rose. If something is proto and it withstand the jaynell then it is ferial. If something withstand the warren and the warren overjoy the mala then the warren is untucked. If the jaynell misconduct the rose and the jaynell withstand the warren then the jaynell is spirited. The rose is ferial.", "logic": "\nOverjoy(mala, warren)\nMisconduct(mala, jaynell)\nFascinated(jaynell)\nWithstand(jaynell, warren)\nOverjoy(jaynell, mala)\nMisconduct(jaynell, rose)\nMisconduct(jaynell, warren)\nSpirited(rose)\nProto(rose)\nOverjoy(rose, mala)\nOverjoy(rose, jaynell)\nMisconduct(rose, jaynell)\nWithstand(warren, rose)\nOverjoy(warren, mala)\nMisconduct(warren, jaynell)\nforall x (Withstand(x, mala) -> Misconduct(x, rose))\nforall x (Withstand(x, warren) -> Withstand(warren, mala))\nMisconduct(warren, rose) -> Overjoy(warren, rose)\nforall x (Proto(x) and Withstand(x, jaynell) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Withstand(x, warren) and Overjoy(warren, mala) -> Untucked(warren))\nMisconduct(jaynell, rose) and Withstand(jaynell, warren) -> Spirited(jaynell)\n\nFerial(rose)\n\nforall x (Proto(x) and Withstand(x, jaynell) -> Ferial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The marlena ruckle the nicolle. The marlena encore the adel. The adel is soundless. The adel stave the nicolle. The adel ruckle the marlena. The adel encore the katlin. The adel encore the nicolle. The katlin is standby. The katlin is apropos. The katlin ruckle the marlena. The katlin ruckle the adel. The katlin encore the adel. The nicolle stave the katlin. The nicolle ruckle the marlena. The nicolle encore the adel. If something stave the marlena then it encore the katlin. If something stave the nicolle then the nicolle stave the marlena. If the nicolle encore the katlin then the nicolle ruckle the katlin. If something is apropos and it stave the adel then it is inorganic. If something stave the nicolle and the nicolle ruckle the marlena then the nicolle is cyrillic. If the adel encore the katlin and the adel stave the nicolle then the adel is standby. The nicolle is not inorganic.", "logic": "\nRuckle(marlena, nicolle)\nEncore(marlena, adel)\nSoundless(adel)\nStave(adel, nicolle)\nRuckle(adel, marlena)\nEncore(adel, katlin)\nEncore(adel, nicolle)\nStandby(katlin)\nApropos(katlin)\nRuckle(katlin, marlena)\nRuckle(katlin, adel)\nEncore(katlin, adel)\nStave(nicolle, katlin)\nRuckle(nicolle, marlena)\nEncore(nicolle, adel)\nforall x (Stave(x, marlena) -> Encore(x, katlin))\nforall x (Stave(x, nicolle) -> Stave(nicolle, marlena))\nEncore(nicolle, katlin) -> Ruckle(nicolle, katlin)\nforall x (Apropos(x) and Stave(x, adel) -> Inorganic(x))\nforall x (Stave(x, nicolle) and Ruckle(nicolle, marlena) -> Cyrillic(nicolle))\nEncore(adel, katlin) and Stave(adel, nicolle) -> Standby(adel)\n\nnot Inorganic(nicolle)\n\nforall x (Apropos(x) and Stave(x, adel) -> Inorganic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The derick redevelop the thekla. The derick prepossess the sheena. The sheena is immense. The sheena chirrup the thekla. The sheena redevelop the derick. The sheena prepossess the karlotte. The sheena prepossess the thekla. The karlotte is sedative. The karlotte is fugitive. The karlotte redevelop the derick. The karlotte redevelop the sheena. The karlotte prepossess the sheena. The thekla chirrup the karlotte. The thekla redevelop the derick. The thekla prepossess the sheena. If something chirrup the derick then it prepossess the karlotte. If something chirrup the thekla then the thekla chirrup the derick. If the thekla prepossess the karlotte then the thekla redevelop the karlotte. If something is fugitive and it chirrup the sheena then it is pernicious. If something chirrup the thekla and the thekla redevelop the derick then the thekla is covetous. If the sheena prepossess the karlotte and the sheena chirrup the thekla then the sheena is sedative. The karlotte prepossess the karlotte.", "logic": "\nRedevelop(derick, thekla)\nPrepossess(derick, sheena)\nImmense(sheena)\nChirrup(sheena, thekla)\nRedevelop(sheena, derick)\nPrepossess(sheena, karlotte)\nPrepossess(sheena, thekla)\nSedative(karlotte)\nFugitive(karlotte)\nRedevelop(karlotte, derick)\nRedevelop(karlotte, sheena)\nPrepossess(karlotte, sheena)\nChirrup(thekla, karlotte)\nRedevelop(thekla, derick)\nPrepossess(thekla, sheena)\nforall x (Chirrup(x, derick) -> Prepossess(x, karlotte))\nforall x (Chirrup(x, thekla) -> Chirrup(thekla, derick))\nPrepossess(thekla, karlotte) -> Redevelop(thekla, karlotte)\nforall x (Fugitive(x) and Chirrup(x, sheena) -> Pernicious(x))\nforall x (Chirrup(x, thekla) and Redevelop(thekla, derick) -> Covetous(thekla))\nPrepossess(sheena, karlotte) and Chirrup(sheena, thekla) -> Sedative(sheena)\n\nPrepossess(karlotte, karlotte)\n\nforall x (Chirrup(x, derick) -> Prepossess(x, karlotte)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The jennine disjoint the fritz. The jennine twine the celestia. The celestia is uncertain. The celestia drone the fritz. The celestia disjoint the jennine. The celestia twine the lizzy. The celestia twine the fritz. The lizzy is tinselly. The lizzy is shrivelled. The lizzy disjoint the jennine. The lizzy disjoint the celestia. The lizzy twine the celestia. The fritz drone the lizzy. The fritz disjoint the jennine. The fritz twine the celestia. If something drone the jennine then it twine the lizzy. If something drone the fritz then the fritz drone the jennine. If the fritz twine the lizzy then the fritz disjoint the lizzy. If something is shrivelled and it drone the celestia then it is comic. If something drone the fritz and the fritz disjoint the jennine then the fritz is cowled. If the celestia twine the lizzy and the celestia drone the fritz then the celestia is tinselly. The lizzy does not like the lizzy.", "logic": "\nDisjoint(jennine, fritz)\nTwine(jennine, celestia)\nUncertain(celestia)\nDrone(celestia, fritz)\nDisjoint(celestia, jennine)\nTwine(celestia, lizzy)\nTwine(celestia, fritz)\nTinselly(lizzy)\nShrivelled(lizzy)\nDisjoint(lizzy, jennine)\nDisjoint(lizzy, celestia)\nTwine(lizzy, celestia)\nDrone(fritz, lizzy)\nDisjoint(fritz, jennine)\nTwine(fritz, celestia)\nforall x (Drone(x, jennine) -> Twine(x, lizzy))\nforall x (Drone(x, fritz) -> Drone(fritz, jennine))\nTwine(fritz, lizzy) -> Disjoint(fritz, lizzy)\nforall x (Shrivelled(x) and Drone(x, celestia) -> Comic(x))\nforall x (Drone(x, fritz) and Disjoint(fritz, jennine) -> Cowled(fritz))\nTwine(celestia, lizzy) and Drone(celestia, fritz) -> Tinselly(celestia)\n\nnot Drone(lizzy, lizzy)\n\nnot Drone(lizzy, lizzy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The katrine barrack the nanete. The katrine dismember the aylmer. The aylmer is fancied. The aylmer shackle the nanete. The aylmer barrack the katrine. The aylmer dismember the barn. The aylmer dismember the nanete. The barn is dantesque. The barn is softish. The barn barrack the katrine. The barn barrack the aylmer. The barn dismember the aylmer. The nanete shackle the barn. The nanete barrack the katrine. The nanete dismember the aylmer. If something shackle the katrine then it dismember the barn. If something shackle the nanete then the nanete shackle the katrine. If the nanete dismember the barn then the nanete barrack the barn. If something is softish and it shackle the aylmer then it is contented. If something shackle the nanete and the nanete barrack the katrine then the nanete is planted. If the aylmer dismember the barn and the aylmer shackle the nanete then the aylmer is dantesque. The katrine shackle the nanete.", "logic": "\nBarrack(katrine, nanete)\nDismember(katrine, aylmer)\nFancied(aylmer)\nShackle(aylmer, nanete)\nBarrack(aylmer, katrine)\nDismember(aylmer, barn)\nDismember(aylmer, nanete)\nDantesque(barn)\nSoftish(barn)\nBarrack(barn, katrine)\nBarrack(barn, aylmer)\nDismember(barn, aylmer)\nShackle(nanete, barn)\nBarrack(nanete, katrine)\nDismember(nanete, aylmer)\nforall x (Shackle(x, katrine) -> Dismember(x, barn))\nforall x (Shackle(x, nanete) -> Shackle(nanete, katrine))\nDismember(nanete, barn) -> Barrack(nanete, barn)\nforall x (Softish(x) and Shackle(x, aylmer) -> Contented(x))\nforall x (Shackle(x, nanete) and Barrack(nanete, katrine) -> Planted(nanete))\nDismember(aylmer, barn) and Shackle(aylmer, nanete) -> Dantesque(aylmer)\n\nShackle(katrine, nanete)\n\nShackle(katrine, nanete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The ally enounce the dana. The ally gravitate the barbara. The barbara is meditative. The barbara etherize the dana. The barbara enounce the ally. The barbara gravitate the kristos. The barbara gravitate the dana. The kristos is ciliary. The kristos is scotch. The kristos enounce the ally. The kristos enounce the barbara. The kristos gravitate the barbara. The dana etherize the kristos. The dana enounce the ally. The dana gravitate the barbara. If something etherize the ally then it gravitate the kristos. If something etherize the dana then the dana etherize the ally. If the dana gravitate the kristos then the dana enounce the kristos. If something is scotch and it etherize the barbara then it is mawkish. If something etherize the dana and the dana enounce the ally then the dana is sorry. If the barbara gravitate the kristos and the barbara etherize the dana then the barbara is ciliary. The barbara does not like the ally.", "logic": "\nEnounce(ally, dana)\nGravitate(ally, barbara)\nMeditative(barbara)\nEtherize(barbara, dana)\nEnounce(barbara, ally)\nGravitate(barbara, kristos)\nGravitate(barbara, dana)\nCiliary(kristos)\nScotch(kristos)\nEnounce(kristos, ally)\nEnounce(kristos, barbara)\nGravitate(kristos, barbara)\nEtherize(dana, kristos)\nEnounce(dana, ally)\nGravitate(dana, barbara)\nforall x (Etherize(x, ally) -> Gravitate(x, kristos))\nforall x (Etherize(x, dana) -> Etherize(dana, ally))\nGravitate(dana, kristos) -> Enounce(dana, kristos)\nforall x (Scotch(x) and Etherize(x, barbara) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Etherize(x, dana) and Enounce(dana, ally) -> Sorry(dana))\nGravitate(barbara, kristos) and Etherize(barbara, dana) -> Ciliary(barbara)\n\nnot Etherize(barbara, ally)\n\nnot Etherize(barbara, ally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The saba decipher the mable. The saba theorise the maynord. The maynord is connatural. The maynord misquote the mable. The maynord decipher the saba. The maynord theorise the alyse. The maynord theorise the mable. The alyse is lumpish. The alyse is metonymic. The alyse decipher the saba. The alyse decipher the maynord. The alyse theorise the maynord. The mable misquote the alyse. The mable decipher the saba. The mable theorise the maynord. If something misquote the saba then it theorise the alyse. If something misquote the mable then the mable misquote the saba. If the mable theorise the alyse then the mable decipher the alyse. If something is metonymic and it misquote the maynord then it is prevailing. If something misquote the mable and the mable decipher the saba then the mable is broody. If the maynord theorise the alyse and the maynord misquote the mable then the maynord is lumpish. The alyse theorise the mable.", "logic": "\nDecipher(saba, mable)\nTheorise(saba, maynord)\nConnatural(maynord)\nMisquote(maynord, mable)\nDecipher(maynord, saba)\nTheorise(maynord, alyse)\nTheorise(maynord, mable)\nLumpish(alyse)\nMetonymic(alyse)\nDecipher(alyse, saba)\nDecipher(alyse, maynord)\nTheorise(alyse, maynord)\nMisquote(mable, alyse)\nDecipher(mable, saba)\nTheorise(mable, maynord)\nforall x (Misquote(x, saba) -> Theorise(x, alyse))\nforall x (Misquote(x, mable) -> Misquote(mable, saba))\nTheorise(mable, alyse) -> Decipher(mable, alyse)\nforall x (Metonymic(x) and Misquote(x, maynord) -> Prevailing(x))\nforall x (Misquote(x, mable) and Decipher(mable, saba) -> Broody(mable))\nTheorise(maynord, alyse) and Misquote(maynord, mable) -> Lumpish(maynord)\n\nTheorise(alyse, mable)\n\nTheorise(alyse, mable) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "Alberta is edited. Deanne is edited. Kind, agrestic things are impotent. If Alberta is edited then Alberta is agrestic. Green, weekly things are edited. All impotent things are bristled. Nice things are weekly. All unary, weekly things are impotent. Deanne is edited.", "logic": "\nEdited(alberta)\nEdited(deanne)\nforall x (Weekly(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Impotent(x))\nEdited(alberta) -> Agrestic(alberta)\nforall x (Unary(x) and Weekly(x) -> Edited(x))\nforall x (Impotent(x) -> Bristled(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Weekly(x))\nforall x (Unary(x) and Weekly(x) -> Impotent(x))\n\nEdited(deanne)\n\ntherefore Edited(deanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Brodie is upturned. Rickie is upturned. Kind, efferent things are buckshee. If Brodie is upturned then Brodie is efferent. Green, breathed things are upturned. All buckshee things are contiguous. Nice things are breathed. All slanderous, breathed things are buckshee. Brodie is not upturned.", "logic": "\nUpturned(brodie)\nUpturned(rickie)\nforall x (Breathed(x) and Efferent(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nUpturned(brodie) -> Efferent(brodie)\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Breathed(x) -> Upturned(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Upturned(x) -> Breathed(x))\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Breathed(x) -> Buckshee(x))\n\nnot Upturned(brodie)\n\ntherefore Upturned(brodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Jon is profuse. Brock is profuse. Kind, unbiassed things are overdue. If Jon is profuse then Jon is unbiassed. Green, navigable things are profuse. All overdue things are wounding. Nice things are navigable. All cacuminal, navigable things are overdue. Brock is navigable.", "logic": "\nProfuse(jon)\nProfuse(brock)\nforall x (Navigable(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Overdue(x))\nProfuse(jon) -> Unbiassed(jon)\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Navigable(x) -> Profuse(x))\nforall x (Overdue(x) -> Wounding(x))\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Navigable(x))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Navigable(x) -> Overdue(x))\n\nNavigable(brock)\n\nProfuse(brock) and forall x (Profuse(x) -> Navigable(x)) -> therefore Navigable(brock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Susanetta is blissful. Ralph is blissful. Kind, saccharine things are violative. If Susanetta is blissful then Susanetta is saccharine. Green, azygos things are blissful. All violative things are cataphatic. Nice things are azygos. All expiatory, azygos things are violative. Susanetta is not azygos.", "logic": "\nBlissful(susanetta)\nBlissful(ralph)\nforall x (Azygos(x) and Saccharine(x) -> Violative(x))\nBlissful(susanetta) -> Saccharine(susanetta)\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and Azygos(x) -> Blissful(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) -> Cataphatic(x))\nforall x (Blissful(x) -> Azygos(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and Azygos(x) -> Violative(x))\n\nnot Azygos(susanetta)\n\nBlissful(susanetta) and forall x (Blissful(x) -> Azygos(x)) -> therefore Azygos(susanetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Taite is phagocytic. Lily is phagocytic. Kind, tense things are arcadian. If Taite is phagocytic then Taite is tense. Green, monovular things are phagocytic. All arcadian things are glassed. Nice things are monovular. All shitless, monovular things are arcadian. Taite is arcadian.", "logic": "\nPhagocytic(taite)\nPhagocytic(lily)\nforall x (Monovular(x) and Tense(x) -> Arcadian(x))\nPhagocytic(taite) -> Tense(taite)\nforall x (Shitless(x) and Monovular(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> Glassed(x))\nforall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) and Monovular(x) -> Arcadian(x))\n\nArcadian(taite)\n\nPhagocytic(taite) and forall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Monovular(x)) -> therefore Monovular(taite) Phagocytic(taite) and Phagocytic(taite) -> Tense(taite) -> therefore Tense(taite) Monovular(taite) and Tense(taite) and forall x (Monovular(x) and Tense(x) -> Arcadian(x)) -> therefore Arcadian(taite)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Netti is adenoidal. Harli is adenoidal. Kind, moonless things are paranasal. If Netti is adenoidal then Netti is moonless. Green, regressive things are adenoidal. All paranasal things are pauline. Nice things are regressive. All unfueled, regressive things are paranasal. Netti is not paranasal.", "logic": "\nAdenoidal(netti)\nAdenoidal(harli)\nforall x (Regressive(x) and Moonless(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nAdenoidal(netti) -> Moonless(netti)\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and Regressive(x) -> Adenoidal(x))\nforall x (Paranasal(x) -> Pauline(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Regressive(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and Regressive(x) -> Paranasal(x))\n\nnot Paranasal(netti)\n\nAdenoidal(netti) and forall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Regressive(x)) -> therefore Regressive(netti) Adenoidal(netti) and Adenoidal(netti) -> Moonless(netti) -> therefore Moonless(netti) Regressive(netti) and Moonless(netti) and forall x (Regressive(x) and Moonless(x) -> Paranasal(x)) -> therefore Paranasal(netti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Bernice is crocked. Charmane is crocked. Kind, detached things are eventful. If Bernice is crocked then Bernice is detached. Green, sapless things are crocked. All eventful things are gargantuan. Nice things are sapless. All unworthy, sapless things are eventful. Bernice is gargantuan.", "logic": "\nCrocked(bernice)\nCrocked(charmane)\nforall x (Sapless(x) and Detached(x) -> Eventful(x))\nCrocked(bernice) -> Detached(bernice)\nforall x (Unworthy(x) and Sapless(x) -> Crocked(x))\nforall x (Eventful(x) -> Gargantuan(x))\nforall x (Crocked(x) -> Sapless(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) and Sapless(x) -> Eventful(x))\n\nGargantuan(bernice)\n\nCrocked(bernice) and forall x (Crocked(x) -> Sapless(x)) -> therefore Sapless(bernice) Crocked(bernice) and Crocked(bernice) -> Detached(bernice) -> therefore Detached(bernice) Sapless(bernice) and Detached(bernice) and forall x (Sapless(x) and Detached(x) -> Eventful(x)) -> therefore Eventful(bernice) Eventful(bernice) and forall x (Eventful(x) -> Gargantuan(x)) -> therefore Gargantuan(bernice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Bambie is cloddish. Emmy is cloddish. Kind, amendatory things are lemonlike. If Bambie is cloddish then Bambie is amendatory. Green, ungodly things are cloddish. All lemonlike things are bittie. Nice things are ungodly. All willowy, ungodly things are lemonlike. Bambie is not bittie.", "logic": "\nCloddish(bambie)\nCloddish(emmy)\nforall x (Ungodly(x) and Amendatory(x) -> Lemonlike(x))\nCloddish(bambie) -> Amendatory(bambie)\nforall x (Willowy(x) and Ungodly(x) -> Cloddish(x))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Bittie(x))\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> Ungodly(x))\nforall x (Willowy(x) and Ungodly(x) -> Lemonlike(x))\n\nnot Bittie(bambie)\n\nCloddish(bambie) and forall x (Cloddish(x) -> Ungodly(x)) -> therefore Ungodly(bambie) Cloddish(bambie) and Cloddish(bambie) -> Amendatory(bambie) -> therefore Amendatory(bambie) Ungodly(bambie) and Amendatory(bambie) and forall x (Ungodly(x) and Amendatory(x) -> Lemonlike(x)) -> therefore Lemonlike(bambie) Lemonlike(bambie) and forall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Bittie(x)) -> therefore Bittie(bambie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Lynette is gleaming. Hugo is gleaming. Kind, damascene things are suitable. If Lynette is gleaming then Lynette is damascene. Green, homogenous things are gleaming. All suitable things are immune. Nice things are homogenous. All dislikable, homogenous things are suitable. Hugo is not suitable.", "logic": "\nGleaming(lynette)\nGleaming(hugo)\nforall x (Homogenous(x) and Damascene(x) -> Suitable(x))\nGleaming(lynette) -> Damascene(lynette)\nforall x (Dislikable(x) and Homogenous(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Immune(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Homogenous(x))\nforall x (Dislikable(x) and Homogenous(x) -> Suitable(x))\n\nnot Suitable(hugo)\n\nforall x (Homogenous(x) and Damascene(x) -> Suitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Kendal is ungusseted. Sharl is ungusseted. Kind, storeyed things are antimonial. If Kendal is ungusseted then Kendal is storeyed. Green, headstrong things are ungusseted. All antimonial things are wagnerian. Nice things are headstrong. All neoliberal, headstrong things are antimonial. Sharl is wagnerian.", "logic": "\nUngusseted(kendal)\nUngusseted(sharl)\nforall x (Headstrong(x) and Storeyed(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nUngusseted(kendal) -> Storeyed(kendal)\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Headstrong(x) -> Ungusseted(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Wagnerian(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) -> Headstrong(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Headstrong(x) -> Antimonial(x))\n\nWagnerian(sharl)\n\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Wagnerian(x)) <- forall x (Headstrong(x) and Storeyed(x) -> Antimonial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Dwaine is addicted. Jordana is addicted. Kind, corded things are decussate. If Dwaine is addicted then Dwaine is corded. Green, apothecial things are addicted. All decussate things are ectozoan. Nice things are apothecial. All quadruple, apothecial things are decussate. Jordana is not big.", "logic": "\nAddicted(dwaine)\nAddicted(jordana)\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Corded(x) -> Decussate(x))\nAddicted(dwaine) -> Corded(dwaine)\nforall x (Quadruple(x) and Apothecial(x) -> Addicted(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) -> Ectozoan(x))\nforall x (Addicted(x) -> Apothecial(x))\nforall x (Quadruple(x) and Apothecial(x) -> Decussate(x))\n\nnot Big(jordana)\n\nnot Big(jordana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Rob is juxtaposed. Mabelle is juxtaposed. Kind, venereal things are dilatory. If Rob is juxtaposed then Rob is venereal. Green, repellent things are juxtaposed. All dilatory things are assurgent. Nice things are repellent. All rheumatoid, repellent things are dilatory. Mabelle is venereal.", "logic": "\nJuxtaposed(rob)\nJuxtaposed(mabelle)\nforall x (Repellent(x) and Venereal(x) -> Dilatory(x))\nJuxtaposed(rob) -> Venereal(rob)\nforall x (Rheumatoid(x) and Repellent(x) -> Juxtaposed(x))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) -> Assurgent(x))\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Repellent(x))\nforall x (Rheumatoid(x) and Repellent(x) -> Dilatory(x))\n\nVenereal(mabelle)\n\nVenereal(mabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Mallissa is concurring. Cecilla is concurring. Kind, anaglyphic things are victorian. If Mallissa is concurring then Mallissa is anaglyphic. Green, sprigged things are concurring. All victorian things are unguided. Nice things are sprigged. All immaterial, sprigged things are victorian. Mallissa is not immaterial.", "logic": "\nConcurring(mallissa)\nConcurring(cecilla)\nforall x (Sprigged(x) and Anaglyphic(x) -> Victorian(x))\nConcurring(mallissa) -> Anaglyphic(mallissa)\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Concurring(x))\nforall x (Victorian(x) -> Unguided(x))\nforall x (Concurring(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Victorian(x))\n\nnot Immaterial(mallissa)\n\nnot Immaterial(mallissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Elihu is eviscerate. Jephthah is eviscerate. Kind, solemn things are rental. If Elihu is eviscerate then Elihu is solemn. Green, offsides things are eviscerate. All rental things are narcotized. Nice things are offsides. All peevish, offsides things are rental. Jephthah is peevish.", "logic": "\nEviscerate(elihu)\nEviscerate(jephthah)\nforall x (Offsides(x) and Solemn(x) -> Rental(x))\nEviscerate(elihu) -> Solemn(elihu)\nforall x (Peevish(x) and Offsides(x) -> Eviscerate(x))\nforall x (Rental(x) -> Narcotized(x))\nforall x (Eviscerate(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Peevish(x) and Offsides(x) -> Rental(x))\n\nPeevish(jephthah)\n\nPeevish(jephthah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "The audi oxidise the jacques. The audi squelch the jacques. The audi strut the jae. The jae oxidise the audi. The jae is nonlexical. The jae does not visit the jacques. The jacques does not chase the audi. The jacques is funded. The jacques is nonlexical. The jacques does not visit the jae. If someone squelch the jacques then the jacques squelch the jae. If the jae squelch the jacques then the jacques strut the audi. If someone squelch the jae then the jae strut the audi. If someone oxidise the audi then they do not eat the jae. If someone oxidise the audi and the audi does not visit the jacques then the audi strut the jae. If someone strut the audi then the audi is not nonlexical. The audi oxidise the jacques.", "logic": "\nOxidise(audi, jacques)\nSquelch(audi, jacques)\nStrut(audi, jae)\nOxidise(jae, audi)\nNonlexical(jae)\nnot Strut(jae, jacques)\nnot Oxidise(jacques, audi)\nFunded(jacques)\nNonlexical(jacques)\nnot Strut(jacques, jae)\nforall x (Squelch(x, jacques) -> Squelch(jacques, jae))\nSquelch(jae, jacques) -> Strut(jacques, audi)\nforall x (Squelch(x, jae) -> Strut(jae, audi))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, audi) -> not Squelch(x, jae))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, audi) and not Strut(audi, jacques) -> Strut(audi, jae))\nforall x (Strut(x, audi) -> not Nonlexical(audi))\n\nOxidise(audi, jacques)\n\ntherefore Oxidise(audi, jacques)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The howard sneak the stoddard. The howard abduce the stoddard. The howard predigest the juline. The juline sneak the howard. The juline is infrequent. The juline does not visit the stoddard. The stoddard does not chase the howard. The stoddard is wearied. The stoddard is infrequent. The stoddard does not visit the juline. If someone abduce the stoddard then the stoddard abduce the juline. If the juline abduce the stoddard then the stoddard predigest the howard. If someone abduce the juline then the juline predigest the howard. If someone sneak the howard then they do not eat the juline. If someone sneak the howard and the howard does not visit the stoddard then the howard predigest the juline. If someone predigest the howard then the howard is not infrequent. The howard does not visit the juline.", "logic": "\nSneak(howard, stoddard)\nAbduce(howard, stoddard)\nPredigest(howard, juline)\nSneak(juline, howard)\nInfrequent(juline)\nnot Predigest(juline, stoddard)\nnot Sneak(stoddard, howard)\nWearied(stoddard)\nInfrequent(stoddard)\nnot Predigest(stoddard, juline)\nforall x (Abduce(x, stoddard) -> Abduce(stoddard, juline))\nAbduce(juline, stoddard) -> Predigest(stoddard, howard)\nforall x (Abduce(x, juline) -> Predigest(juline, howard))\nforall x (Sneak(x, howard) -> not Abduce(x, juline))\nforall x (Sneak(x, howard) and not Predigest(howard, stoddard) -> Predigest(howard, juline))\nforall x (Predigest(x, howard) -> not Infrequent(howard))\n\nnot Predigest(howard, juline)\n\ntherefore Predigest(howard, juline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The dodie summons the aimee. The dodie harshen the aimee. The dodie dally the amelie. The amelie summons the dodie. The amelie is ferine. The amelie does not visit the aimee. The aimee does not chase the dodie. The aimee is hemophilic. The aimee is ferine. The aimee does not visit the amelie. If someone harshen the aimee then the aimee harshen the amelie. If the amelie harshen the aimee then the aimee dally the dodie. If someone harshen the amelie then the amelie dally the dodie. If someone summons the dodie then they do not eat the amelie. If someone summons the dodie and the dodie does not visit the aimee then the dodie dally the amelie. If someone dally the dodie then the dodie is not ferine. The aimee harshen the amelie.", "logic": "\nSummons(dodie, aimee)\nHarshen(dodie, aimee)\nDally(dodie, amelie)\nSummons(amelie, dodie)\nFerine(amelie)\nnot Dally(amelie, aimee)\nnot Summons(aimee, dodie)\nHemophilic(aimee)\nFerine(aimee)\nnot Dally(aimee, amelie)\nforall x (Harshen(x, aimee) -> Harshen(aimee, amelie))\nHarshen(amelie, aimee) -> Dally(aimee, dodie)\nforall x (Harshen(x, amelie) -> Dally(amelie, dodie))\nforall x (Summons(x, dodie) -> not Harshen(x, amelie))\nforall x (Summons(x, dodie) and not Dally(dodie, aimee) -> Dally(dodie, amelie))\nforall x (Dally(x, dodie) -> not Ferine(dodie))\n\nHarshen(aimee, amelie)\n\nHarshen(dodie, aimee) and forall x (Harshen(x, aimee) -> Harshen(aimee, amelie)) -> therefore Harshen(aimee, amelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The masha predigest the leonore. The masha costume the leonore. The masha suspend the luelle. The luelle predigest the masha. The luelle is curst. The luelle does not visit the leonore. The leonore does not chase the masha. The leonore is edified. The leonore is curst. The leonore does not visit the luelle. If someone costume the leonore then the leonore costume the luelle. If the luelle costume the leonore then the leonore suspend the masha. If someone costume the luelle then the luelle suspend the masha. If someone predigest the masha then they do not eat the luelle. If someone predigest the masha and the masha does not visit the leonore then the masha suspend the luelle. If someone suspend the masha then the masha is not curst. The leonore does not eat the luelle.", "logic": "\nPredigest(masha, leonore)\nCostume(masha, leonore)\nSuspend(masha, luelle)\nPredigest(luelle, masha)\nCurst(luelle)\nnot Suspend(luelle, leonore)\nnot Predigest(leonore, masha)\nEdified(leonore)\nCurst(leonore)\nnot Suspend(leonore, luelle)\nforall x (Costume(x, leonore) -> Costume(leonore, luelle))\nCostume(luelle, leonore) -> Suspend(leonore, masha)\nforall x (Costume(x, luelle) -> Suspend(luelle, masha))\nforall x (Predigest(x, masha) -> not Costume(x, luelle))\nforall x (Predigest(x, masha) and not Suspend(masha, leonore) -> Suspend(masha, luelle))\nforall x (Suspend(x, masha) -> not Curst(masha))\n\nnot Costume(leonore, luelle)\n\nCostume(masha, leonore) and forall x (Costume(x, leonore) -> Costume(leonore, luelle)) -> therefore Costume(leonore, luelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The morissa exposit the cob. The morissa plat the cob. The morissa syncretize the denni. The denni exposit the morissa. The denni is bulbaceous. The denni does not visit the cob. The cob does not chase the morissa. The cob is bewitching. The cob is bulbaceous. The cob does not visit the denni. If someone plat the cob then the cob plat the denni. If the denni plat the cob then the cob syncretize the morissa. If someone plat the denni then the denni syncretize the morissa. If someone exposit the morissa then they do not eat the denni. If someone exposit the morissa and the morissa does not visit the cob then the morissa syncretize the denni. If someone syncretize the morissa then the morissa is not bulbaceous. The denni syncretize the morissa.", "logic": "\nExposit(morissa, cob)\nPlat(morissa, cob)\nSyncretize(morissa, denni)\nExposit(denni, morissa)\nBulbaceous(denni)\nnot Syncretize(denni, cob)\nnot Exposit(cob, morissa)\nBewitching(cob)\nBulbaceous(cob)\nnot Syncretize(cob, denni)\nforall x (Plat(x, cob) -> Plat(cob, denni))\nPlat(denni, cob) -> Syncretize(cob, morissa)\nforall x (Plat(x, denni) -> Syncretize(denni, morissa))\nforall x (Exposit(x, morissa) -> not Plat(x, denni))\nforall x (Exposit(x, morissa) and not Syncretize(morissa, cob) -> Syncretize(morissa, denni))\nforall x (Syncretize(x, morissa) -> not Bulbaceous(morissa))\n\nSyncretize(denni, morissa)\n\nPlat(morissa, cob) and forall x (Plat(x, cob) -> Plat(cob, denni)) -> therefore Plat(cob, denni) Plat(cob, denni) and forall x (Plat(x, denni) -> Syncretize(denni, morissa)) -> therefore Syncretize(denni, morissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The wilmer sandbag the jeanelle. The wilmer short the jeanelle. The wilmer slit the lauren. The lauren sandbag the wilmer. The lauren is egoistical. The lauren does not visit the jeanelle. The jeanelle does not chase the wilmer. The jeanelle is maoist. The jeanelle is egoistical. The jeanelle does not visit the lauren. If someone short the jeanelle then the jeanelle short the lauren. If the lauren short the jeanelle then the jeanelle slit the wilmer. If someone short the lauren then the lauren slit the wilmer. If someone sandbag the wilmer then they do not eat the lauren. If someone sandbag the wilmer and the wilmer does not visit the jeanelle then the wilmer slit the lauren. If someone slit the wilmer then the wilmer is not egoistical. The lauren does not visit the wilmer.", "logic": "\nSandbag(wilmer, jeanelle)\nShort(wilmer, jeanelle)\nSlit(wilmer, lauren)\nSandbag(lauren, wilmer)\nEgoistical(lauren)\nnot Slit(lauren, jeanelle)\nnot Sandbag(jeanelle, wilmer)\nMaoist(jeanelle)\nEgoistical(jeanelle)\nnot Slit(jeanelle, lauren)\nforall x (Short(x, jeanelle) -> Short(jeanelle, lauren))\nShort(lauren, jeanelle) -> Slit(jeanelle, wilmer)\nforall x (Short(x, lauren) -> Slit(lauren, wilmer))\nforall x (Sandbag(x, wilmer) -> not Short(x, lauren))\nforall x (Sandbag(x, wilmer) and not Slit(wilmer, jeanelle) -> Slit(wilmer, lauren))\nforall x (Slit(x, wilmer) -> not Egoistical(wilmer))\n\nnot Slit(lauren, wilmer)\n\nShort(wilmer, jeanelle) and forall x (Short(x, jeanelle) -> Short(jeanelle, lauren)) -> therefore Short(jeanelle, lauren) Short(jeanelle, lauren) and forall x (Short(x, lauren) -> Slit(lauren, wilmer)) -> therefore Slit(lauren, wilmer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The elysha envy the major. The elysha correspond the major. The elysha dissolve the florette. The florette envy the elysha. The florette is incised. The florette does not visit the major. The major does not chase the elysha. The major is sulfuric. The major is incised. The major does not visit the florette. If someone correspond the major then the major correspond the florette. If the florette correspond the major then the major dissolve the elysha. If someone correspond the florette then the florette dissolve the elysha. If someone envy the elysha then they do not eat the florette. If someone envy the elysha and the elysha does not visit the major then the elysha dissolve the florette. If someone dissolve the elysha then the elysha is not incised. The elysha is not incised.", "logic": "\nEnvy(elysha, major)\nCorrespond(elysha, major)\nDissolve(elysha, florette)\nEnvy(florette, elysha)\nIncised(florette)\nnot Dissolve(florette, major)\nnot Envy(major, elysha)\nSulfuric(major)\nIncised(major)\nnot Dissolve(major, florette)\nforall x (Correspond(x, major) -> Correspond(major, florette))\nCorrespond(florette, major) -> Dissolve(major, elysha)\nforall x (Correspond(x, florette) -> Dissolve(florette, elysha))\nforall x (Envy(x, elysha) -> not Correspond(x, florette))\nforall x (Envy(x, elysha) and not Dissolve(elysha, major) -> Dissolve(elysha, florette))\nforall x (Dissolve(x, elysha) -> not Incised(elysha))\n\nnot Incised(elysha)\n\nCorrespond(elysha, major) and forall x (Correspond(x, major) -> Correspond(major, florette)) -> therefore Correspond(major, florette) Correspond(major, florette) and forall x (Correspond(x, florette) -> Dissolve(florette, elysha)) -> therefore Dissolve(florette, elysha) Dissolve(florette, elysha) and forall x (Dissolve(x, elysha) -> not Incised(elysha)) -> therefore not Incised(elysha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The augustus snowball the jenna. The augustus infatuate the jenna. The augustus bomb the ravil. The ravil snowball the augustus. The ravil is subtle. The ravil does not visit the jenna. The jenna does not chase the augustus. The jenna is hydraulic. The jenna is subtle. The jenna does not visit the ravil. If someone infatuate the jenna then the jenna infatuate the ravil. If the ravil infatuate the jenna then the jenna bomb the augustus. If someone infatuate the ravil then the ravil bomb the augustus. If someone snowball the augustus then they do not eat the ravil. If someone snowball the augustus and the augustus does not visit the jenna then the augustus bomb the ravil. If someone bomb the augustus then the augustus is not subtle. The augustus is subtle.", "logic": "\nSnowball(augustus, jenna)\nInfatuate(augustus, jenna)\nBomb(augustus, ravil)\nSnowball(ravil, augustus)\nSubtle(ravil)\nnot Bomb(ravil, jenna)\nnot Snowball(jenna, augustus)\nHydraulic(jenna)\nSubtle(jenna)\nnot Bomb(jenna, ravil)\nforall x (Infatuate(x, jenna) -> Infatuate(jenna, ravil))\nInfatuate(ravil, jenna) -> Bomb(jenna, augustus)\nforall x (Infatuate(x, ravil) -> Bomb(ravil, augustus))\nforall x (Snowball(x, augustus) -> not Infatuate(x, ravil))\nforall x (Snowball(x, augustus) and not Bomb(augustus, jenna) -> Bomb(augustus, ravil))\nforall x (Bomb(x, augustus) -> not Subtle(augustus))\n\nSubtle(augustus)\n\nInfatuate(augustus, jenna) and forall x (Infatuate(x, jenna) -> Infatuate(jenna, ravil)) -> therefore Infatuate(jenna, ravil) Infatuate(jenna, ravil) and forall x (Infatuate(x, ravil) -> Bomb(ravil, augustus)) -> therefore Bomb(ravil, augustus) Bomb(ravil, augustus) and forall x (Bomb(x, augustus) -> not Subtle(augustus)) -> therefore not Subtle(augustus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The taddeus garb the tobin. The taddeus pour the tobin. The taddeus tattoo the damian. The damian garb the taddeus. The damian is dramatic. The damian does not visit the tobin. The tobin does not chase the taddeus. The tobin is itchy. The tobin is dramatic. The tobin does not visit the damian. If someone pour the tobin then the tobin pour the damian. If the damian pour the tobin then the tobin tattoo the taddeus. If someone pour the damian then the damian tattoo the taddeus. If someone garb the taddeus then they do not eat the damian. If someone garb the taddeus and the taddeus does not visit the tobin then the taddeus tattoo the damian. If someone tattoo the taddeus then the taddeus is not dramatic. The tobin does not visit the taddeus.", "logic": "\nGarb(taddeus, tobin)\nPour(taddeus, tobin)\nTattoo(taddeus, damian)\nGarb(damian, taddeus)\nDramatic(damian)\nnot Tattoo(damian, tobin)\nnot Garb(tobin, taddeus)\nItchy(tobin)\nDramatic(tobin)\nnot Tattoo(tobin, damian)\nforall x (Pour(x, tobin) -> Pour(tobin, damian))\nPour(damian, tobin) -> Tattoo(tobin, taddeus)\nforall x (Pour(x, damian) -> Tattoo(damian, taddeus))\nforall x (Garb(x, taddeus) -> not Pour(x, damian))\nforall x (Garb(x, taddeus) and not Tattoo(taddeus, tobin) -> Tattoo(taddeus, damian))\nforall x (Tattoo(x, taddeus) -> not Dramatic(taddeus))\n\nnot Tattoo(tobin, taddeus)\n\nPour(damian, tobin) -> Tattoo(tobin, taddeus) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The rafaela patronize the dyann. The rafaela chase the dyann. The rafaela pelt the esau. The esau patronize the rafaela. The esau is bulgarian. The esau does not visit the dyann. The dyann does not chase the rafaela. The dyann is jellylike. The dyann is bulgarian. The dyann does not visit the esau. If someone chase the dyann then the dyann chase the esau. If the esau chase the dyann then the dyann pelt the rafaela. If someone chase the esau then the esau pelt the rafaela. If someone patronize the rafaela then they do not eat the esau. If someone patronize the rafaela and the rafaela does not visit the dyann then the rafaela pelt the esau. If someone pelt the rafaela then the rafaela is not bulgarian. The dyann patronize the dyann.", "logic": "\nPatronize(rafaela, dyann)\nChase(rafaela, dyann)\nPelt(rafaela, esau)\nPatronize(esau, rafaela)\nBulgarian(esau)\nnot Pelt(esau, dyann)\nnot Patronize(dyann, rafaela)\nJellylike(dyann)\nBulgarian(dyann)\nnot Pelt(dyann, esau)\nforall x (Chase(x, dyann) -> Chase(dyann, esau))\nChase(esau, dyann) -> Pelt(dyann, rafaela)\nforall x (Chase(x, esau) -> Pelt(esau, rafaela))\nforall x (Patronize(x, rafaela) -> not Chase(x, esau))\nforall x (Patronize(x, rafaela) and not Pelt(rafaela, dyann) -> Pelt(rafaela, esau))\nforall x (Pelt(x, rafaela) -> not Bulgarian(rafaela))\n\nPatronize(dyann, dyann)\n\nPatronize(dyann, dyann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The arlene glamour the javier. The arlene total the javier. The arlene unman the page. The page glamour the arlene. The page is ribbed. The page does not visit the javier. The javier does not chase the arlene. The javier is drifting. The javier is ribbed. The javier does not visit the page. If someone total the javier then the javier total the page. If the page total the javier then the javier unman the arlene. If someone total the page then the page unman the arlene. If someone glamour the arlene then they do not eat the page. If someone glamour the arlene and the arlene does not visit the javier then the arlene unman the page. If someone unman the arlene then the arlene is not ribbed. The arlene does not chase the page.", "logic": "\nGlamour(arlene, javier)\nTotal(arlene, javier)\nUnman(arlene, page)\nGlamour(page, arlene)\nRibbed(page)\nnot Unman(page, javier)\nnot Glamour(javier, arlene)\nDrifting(javier)\nRibbed(javier)\nnot Unman(javier, page)\nforall x (Total(x, javier) -> Total(javier, page))\nTotal(page, javier) -> Unman(javier, arlene)\nforall x (Total(x, page) -> Unman(page, arlene))\nforall x (Glamour(x, arlene) -> not Total(x, page))\nforall x (Glamour(x, arlene) and not Unman(arlene, javier) -> Unman(arlene, page))\nforall x (Unman(x, arlene) -> not Ribbed(arlene))\n\nnot Glamour(arlene, page)\n\nnot Glamour(arlene, page) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The bertina uncross the guthry. The bertina itinerate the guthry. The bertina unbraid the steffen. The steffen uncross the bertina. The steffen is caudal. The steffen does not visit the guthry. The guthry does not chase the bertina. The guthry is repand. The guthry is caudal. The guthry does not visit the steffen. If someone itinerate the guthry then the guthry itinerate the steffen. If the steffen itinerate the guthry then the guthry unbraid the bertina. If someone itinerate the steffen then the steffen unbraid the bertina. If someone uncross the bertina then they do not eat the steffen. If someone uncross the bertina and the bertina does not visit the guthry then the bertina unbraid the steffen. If someone unbraid the bertina then the bertina is not caudal. The bertina unbraid the guthry.", "logic": "\nUncross(bertina, guthry)\nItinerate(bertina, guthry)\nUnbraid(bertina, steffen)\nUncross(steffen, bertina)\nCaudal(steffen)\nnot Unbraid(steffen, guthry)\nnot Uncross(guthry, bertina)\nRepand(guthry)\nCaudal(guthry)\nnot Unbraid(guthry, steffen)\nforall x (Itinerate(x, guthry) -> Itinerate(guthry, steffen))\nItinerate(steffen, guthry) -> Unbraid(guthry, bertina)\nforall x (Itinerate(x, steffen) -> Unbraid(steffen, bertina))\nforall x (Uncross(x, bertina) -> not Itinerate(x, steffen))\nforall x (Uncross(x, bertina) and not Unbraid(bertina, guthry) -> Unbraid(bertina, steffen))\nforall x (Unbraid(x, bertina) -> not Caudal(bertina))\n\nUnbraid(bertina, guthry)\n\nUnbraid(bertina, guthry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The roda bustle the reg. The roda tarnish the reg. The roda drain the hadria. The hadria bustle the roda. The hadria is dyslectic. The hadria does not visit the reg. The reg does not chase the roda. The reg is amblyopic. The reg is dyslectic. The reg does not visit the hadria. If someone tarnish the reg then the reg tarnish the hadria. If the hadria tarnish the reg then the reg drain the roda. If someone tarnish the hadria then the hadria drain the roda. If someone bustle the roda then they do not eat the hadria. If someone bustle the roda and the roda does not visit the reg then the roda drain the hadria. If someone drain the roda then the roda is not dyslectic. The hadria is not round.", "logic": "\nBustle(roda, reg)\nTarnish(roda, reg)\nDrain(roda, hadria)\nBustle(hadria, roda)\nDyslectic(hadria)\nnot Drain(hadria, reg)\nnot Bustle(reg, roda)\nAmblyopic(reg)\nDyslectic(reg)\nnot Drain(reg, hadria)\nforall x (Tarnish(x, reg) -> Tarnish(reg, hadria))\nTarnish(hadria, reg) -> Drain(reg, roda)\nforall x (Tarnish(x, hadria) -> Drain(hadria, roda))\nforall x (Bustle(x, roda) -> not Tarnish(x, hadria))\nforall x (Bustle(x, roda) and not Drain(roda, reg) -> Drain(roda, hadria))\nforall x (Drain(x, roda) -> not Dyslectic(roda))\n\nnot Round(hadria)\n\nnot Round(hadria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The vivi will the dian. The vivi dwell the dian. The vivi ware the katerina. The katerina will the vivi. The katerina is unerasable. The katerina does not visit the dian. The dian does not chase the vivi. The dian is amended. The dian is unerasable. The dian does not visit the katerina. If someone dwell the dian then the dian dwell the katerina. If the katerina dwell the dian then the dian ware the vivi. If someone dwell the katerina then the katerina ware the vivi. If someone will the vivi then they do not eat the katerina. If someone will the vivi and the vivi does not visit the dian then the vivi ware the katerina. If someone ware the vivi then the vivi is not unerasable. The vivi is amended.", "logic": "\nWill(vivi, dian)\nDwell(vivi, dian)\nWare(vivi, katerina)\nWill(katerina, vivi)\nUnerasable(katerina)\nnot Ware(katerina, dian)\nnot Will(dian, vivi)\nAmended(dian)\nUnerasable(dian)\nnot Ware(dian, katerina)\nforall x (Dwell(x, dian) -> Dwell(dian, katerina))\nDwell(katerina, dian) -> Ware(dian, vivi)\nforall x (Dwell(x, katerina) -> Ware(katerina, vivi))\nforall x (Will(x, vivi) -> not Dwell(x, katerina))\nforall x (Will(x, vivi) and not Ware(vivi, dian) -> Ware(vivi, katerina))\nforall x (Ware(x, vivi) -> not Unerasable(vivi))\n\nAmended(vivi)\n\nAmended(vivi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The thurstan retrogress the roxie. The thurstan grind the roxie. The thurstan meter the nathalia. The nathalia retrogress the thurstan. The nathalia is arboresque. The nathalia does not visit the roxie. The roxie does not chase the thurstan. The roxie is hominian. The roxie is arboresque. The roxie does not visit the nathalia. If someone grind the roxie then the roxie grind the nathalia. If the nathalia grind the roxie then the roxie meter the thurstan. If someone grind the nathalia then the nathalia meter the thurstan. If someone retrogress the thurstan then they do not eat the nathalia. If someone retrogress the thurstan and the thurstan does not visit the roxie then the thurstan meter the nathalia. If someone meter the thurstan then the thurstan is not arboresque. The thurstan does not eat the nathalia.", "logic": "\nRetrogress(thurstan, roxie)\nGrind(thurstan, roxie)\nMeter(thurstan, nathalia)\nRetrogress(nathalia, thurstan)\nArboresque(nathalia)\nnot Meter(nathalia, roxie)\nnot Retrogress(roxie, thurstan)\nHominian(roxie)\nArboresque(roxie)\nnot Meter(roxie, nathalia)\nforall x (Grind(x, roxie) -> Grind(roxie, nathalia))\nGrind(nathalia, roxie) -> Meter(roxie, thurstan)\nforall x (Grind(x, nathalia) -> Meter(nathalia, thurstan))\nforall x (Retrogress(x, thurstan) -> not Grind(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Retrogress(x, thurstan) and not Meter(thurstan, roxie) -> Meter(thurstan, nathalia))\nforall x (Meter(x, thurstan) -> not Arboresque(thurstan))\n\nnot Grind(thurstan, nathalia)\n\nnot Grind(thurstan, nathalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The benetta level the jef. The benetta clack the jef. The benetta kneecap the luana. The luana level the benetta. The luana is packable. The luana does not visit the jef. The jef does not chase the benetta. The jef is tiresome. The jef is packable. The jef does not visit the luana. If someone clack the jef then the jef clack the luana. If the luana clack the jef then the jef kneecap the benetta. If someone clack the luana then the luana kneecap the benetta. If someone level the benetta then they do not eat the luana. If someone level the benetta and the benetta does not visit the jef then the benetta kneecap the luana. If someone kneecap the benetta then the benetta is not packable. The luana clack the benetta.", "logic": "\nLevel(benetta, jef)\nClack(benetta, jef)\nKneecap(benetta, luana)\nLevel(luana, benetta)\nPackable(luana)\nnot Kneecap(luana, jef)\nnot Level(jef, benetta)\nTiresome(jef)\nPackable(jef)\nnot Kneecap(jef, luana)\nforall x (Clack(x, jef) -> Clack(jef, luana))\nClack(luana, jef) -> Kneecap(jef, benetta)\nforall x (Clack(x, luana) -> Kneecap(luana, benetta))\nforall x (Level(x, benetta) -> not Clack(x, luana))\nforall x (Level(x, benetta) and not Kneecap(benetta, jef) -> Kneecap(benetta, luana))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, benetta) -> not Packable(benetta))\n\nClack(luana, benetta)\n\nClack(luana, benetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The hailey is astonished. The hailey is plantar. The hailey is loverlike. The hailey increase the blondelle. The hailey corrade the blondelle. The hailey parachute the blondelle. The blondelle is addled. The blondelle is plantar. The blondelle is baseless. The blondelle increase the hailey. The blondelle corrade the hailey. The blondelle parachute the hailey. If something increase the hailey then it is addled. If something is addled and it increase the blondelle then it corrade the blondelle. If something corrade the blondelle then it is astonished. If something corrade the blondelle and it parachute the blondelle then it is loverlike. If something is addled then it increase the blondelle. If something parachute the hailey and the hailey increase the blondelle then the hailey corrade the blondelle. If something increase the hailey then the hailey parachute the blondelle. If something is loverlike then it increase the blondelle. The blondelle is plantar.", "logic": "\nAstonished(hailey)\nPlantar(hailey)\nLoverlike(hailey)\nIncrease(hailey, blondelle)\nCorrade(hailey, blondelle)\nParachute(hailey, blondelle)\nAddled(blondelle)\nPlantar(blondelle)\nBaseless(blondelle)\nIncrease(blondelle, hailey)\nCorrade(blondelle, hailey)\nParachute(blondelle, hailey)\nforall x (Increase(x, hailey) -> Addled(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) and Increase(x, blondelle) -> Corrade(x, blondelle))\nforall x (Corrade(x, blondelle) -> Astonished(x))\nforall x (Corrade(x, blondelle) and Parachute(x, blondelle) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) -> Increase(x, blondelle))\nforall x (Parachute(x, hailey) and Increase(hailey, blondelle) -> Corrade(hailey, blondelle))\nforall x (Increase(x, hailey) -> Parachute(hailey, blondelle))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Increase(x, blondelle))\n\nPlantar(blondelle)\n\ntherefore Plantar(blondelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The ealasaid is energizing. The ealasaid is failing. The ealasaid is manifest. The ealasaid afforest the binnie. The ealasaid alarm the binnie. The ealasaid lube the binnie. The binnie is observant. The binnie is failing. The binnie is trihydroxy. The binnie afforest the ealasaid. The binnie alarm the ealasaid. The binnie lube the ealasaid. If something afforest the ealasaid then it is observant. If something is observant and it afforest the binnie then it alarm the binnie. If something alarm the binnie then it is energizing. If something alarm the binnie and it lube the binnie then it is manifest. If something is observant then it afforest the binnie. If something lube the ealasaid and the ealasaid afforest the binnie then the ealasaid alarm the binnie. If something afforest the ealasaid then the ealasaid lube the binnie. If something is manifest then it afforest the binnie. The ealasaid does not visit the binnie.", "logic": "\nEnergizing(ealasaid)\nFailing(ealasaid)\nManifest(ealasaid)\nAfforest(ealasaid, binnie)\nAlarm(ealasaid, binnie)\nLube(ealasaid, binnie)\nObservant(binnie)\nFailing(binnie)\nTrihydroxy(binnie)\nAfforest(binnie, ealasaid)\nAlarm(binnie, ealasaid)\nLube(binnie, ealasaid)\nforall x (Afforest(x, ealasaid) -> Observant(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) and Afforest(x, binnie) -> Alarm(x, binnie))\nforall x (Alarm(x, binnie) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Alarm(x, binnie) and Lube(x, binnie) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) -> Afforest(x, binnie))\nforall x (Lube(x, ealasaid) and Afforest(ealasaid, binnie) -> Alarm(ealasaid, binnie))\nforall x (Afforest(x, ealasaid) -> Lube(ealasaid, binnie))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Afforest(x, binnie))\n\nnot Lube(ealasaid, binnie)\n\ntherefore Lube(ealasaid, binnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The griff is unlaced. The griff is snakelike. The griff is chagrined. The griff randomise the adrienne. The griff islamise the adrienne. The griff retrench the adrienne. The adrienne is privy. The adrienne is snakelike. The adrienne is blind. The adrienne randomise the griff. The adrienne islamise the griff. The adrienne retrench the griff. If something randomise the griff then it is privy. If something is privy and it randomise the adrienne then it islamise the adrienne. If something islamise the adrienne then it is unlaced. If something islamise the adrienne and it retrench the adrienne then it is chagrined. If something is privy then it randomise the adrienne. If something retrench the griff and the griff randomise the adrienne then the griff islamise the adrienne. If something randomise the griff then the griff retrench the adrienne. If something is chagrined then it randomise the adrienne. The adrienne randomise the adrienne.", "logic": "\nUnlaced(griff)\nSnakelike(griff)\nChagrined(griff)\nRandomise(griff, adrienne)\nIslamise(griff, adrienne)\nRetrench(griff, adrienne)\nPrivy(adrienne)\nSnakelike(adrienne)\nBlind(adrienne)\nRandomise(adrienne, griff)\nIslamise(adrienne, griff)\nRetrench(adrienne, griff)\nforall x (Randomise(x, griff) -> Privy(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) and Randomise(x, adrienne) -> Islamise(x, adrienne))\nforall x (Islamise(x, adrienne) -> Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Islamise(x, adrienne) and Retrench(x, adrienne) -> Chagrined(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) -> Randomise(x, adrienne))\nforall x (Retrench(x, griff) and Randomise(griff, adrienne) -> Islamise(griff, adrienne))\nforall x (Randomise(x, griff) -> Retrench(griff, adrienne))\nforall x (Chagrined(x) -> Randomise(x, adrienne))\n\nRandomise(adrienne, adrienne)\n\nPrivy(adrienne) and forall x (Privy(x) -> Randomise(x, adrienne)) -> therefore Randomise(adrienne, adrienne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The bebe is enamored. The bebe is acellular. The bebe is acanthotic. The bebe acerbate the mattheus. The bebe restart the mattheus. The bebe disarm the mattheus. The mattheus is asquint. The mattheus is acellular. The mattheus is unhallowed. The mattheus acerbate the bebe. The mattheus restart the bebe. The mattheus disarm the bebe. If something acerbate the bebe then it is asquint. If something is asquint and it acerbate the mattheus then it restart the mattheus. If something restart the mattheus then it is enamored. If something restart the mattheus and it disarm the mattheus then it is acanthotic. If something is asquint then it acerbate the mattheus. If something disarm the bebe and the bebe acerbate the mattheus then the bebe restart the mattheus. If something acerbate the bebe then the bebe disarm the mattheus. If something is acanthotic then it acerbate the mattheus. The mattheus does not need the mattheus.", "logic": "\nEnamored(bebe)\nAcellular(bebe)\nAcanthotic(bebe)\nAcerbate(bebe, mattheus)\nRestart(bebe, mattheus)\nDisarm(bebe, mattheus)\nAsquint(mattheus)\nAcellular(mattheus)\nUnhallowed(mattheus)\nAcerbate(mattheus, bebe)\nRestart(mattheus, bebe)\nDisarm(mattheus, bebe)\nforall x (Acerbate(x, bebe) -> Asquint(x))\nforall x (Asquint(x) and Acerbate(x, mattheus) -> Restart(x, mattheus))\nforall x (Restart(x, mattheus) -> Enamored(x))\nforall x (Restart(x, mattheus) and Disarm(x, mattheus) -> Acanthotic(x))\nforall x (Asquint(x) -> Acerbate(x, mattheus))\nforall x (Disarm(x, bebe) and Acerbate(bebe, mattheus) -> Restart(bebe, mattheus))\nforall x (Acerbate(x, bebe) -> Disarm(bebe, mattheus))\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) -> Acerbate(x, mattheus))\n\nnot Acerbate(mattheus, mattheus)\n\nAsquint(mattheus) and forall x (Asquint(x) -> Acerbate(x, mattheus)) -> therefore Acerbate(mattheus, mattheus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The douglas is avertible. The douglas is hatched. The douglas is paroicous. The douglas dispirit the julianne. The douglas retie the julianne. The douglas eavesdrop the julianne. The julianne is hypnotized. The julianne is hatched. The julianne is colour. The julianne dispirit the douglas. The julianne retie the douglas. The julianne eavesdrop the douglas. If something dispirit the douglas then it is hypnotized. If something is hypnotized and it dispirit the julianne then it retie the julianne. If something retie the julianne then it is avertible. If something retie the julianne and it eavesdrop the julianne then it is paroicous. If something is hypnotized then it dispirit the julianne. If something eavesdrop the douglas and the douglas dispirit the julianne then the douglas retie the julianne. If something dispirit the douglas then the douglas eavesdrop the julianne. If something is paroicous then it dispirit the julianne. The julianne retie the julianne.", "logic": "\nAvertible(douglas)\nHatched(douglas)\nParoicous(douglas)\nDispirit(douglas, julianne)\nRetie(douglas, julianne)\nEavesdrop(douglas, julianne)\nHypnotized(julianne)\nHatched(julianne)\nColour(julianne)\nDispirit(julianne, douglas)\nRetie(julianne, douglas)\nEavesdrop(julianne, douglas)\nforall x (Dispirit(x, douglas) -> Hypnotized(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) and Dispirit(x, julianne) -> Retie(x, julianne))\nforall x (Retie(x, julianne) -> Avertible(x))\nforall x (Retie(x, julianne) and Eavesdrop(x, julianne) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Dispirit(x, julianne))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, douglas) and Dispirit(douglas, julianne) -> Retie(douglas, julianne))\nforall x (Dispirit(x, douglas) -> Eavesdrop(douglas, julianne))\nforall x (Paroicous(x) -> Dispirit(x, julianne))\n\nRetie(julianne, julianne)\n\nHypnotized(julianne) and forall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Dispirit(x, julianne)) -> therefore Dispirit(julianne, julianne) Hypnotized(julianne) and Dispirit(julianne, julianne) and forall x (Hypnotized(x) and Dispirit(x, julianne) -> Retie(x, julianne)) -> therefore Retie(julianne, julianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The kingsly is bristled. The kingsly is limacine. The kingsly is lentiform. The kingsly improvise the jocelyne. The kingsly offset the jocelyne. The kingsly impose the jocelyne. The jocelyne is packable. The jocelyne is limacine. The jocelyne is bigamous. The jocelyne improvise the kingsly. The jocelyne offset the kingsly. The jocelyne impose the kingsly. If something improvise the kingsly then it is packable. If something is packable and it improvise the jocelyne then it offset the jocelyne. If something offset the jocelyne then it is bristled. If something offset the jocelyne and it impose the jocelyne then it is lentiform. If something is packable then it improvise the jocelyne. If something impose the kingsly and the kingsly improvise the jocelyne then the kingsly offset the jocelyne. If something improvise the kingsly then the kingsly impose the jocelyne. If something is lentiform then it improvise the jocelyne. The jocelyne does not see the jocelyne.", "logic": "\nBristled(kingsly)\nLimacine(kingsly)\nLentiform(kingsly)\nImprovise(kingsly, jocelyne)\nOffset(kingsly, jocelyne)\nImpose(kingsly, jocelyne)\nPackable(jocelyne)\nLimacine(jocelyne)\nBigamous(jocelyne)\nImprovise(jocelyne, kingsly)\nOffset(jocelyne, kingsly)\nImpose(jocelyne, kingsly)\nforall x (Improvise(x, kingsly) -> Packable(x))\nforall x (Packable(x) and Improvise(x, jocelyne) -> Offset(x, jocelyne))\nforall x (Offset(x, jocelyne) -> Bristled(x))\nforall x (Offset(x, jocelyne) and Impose(x, jocelyne) -> Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Packable(x) -> Improvise(x, jocelyne))\nforall x (Impose(x, kingsly) and Improvise(kingsly, jocelyne) -> Offset(kingsly, jocelyne))\nforall x (Improvise(x, kingsly) -> Impose(kingsly, jocelyne))\nforall x (Lentiform(x) -> Improvise(x, jocelyne))\n\nnot Offset(jocelyne, jocelyne)\n\nPackable(jocelyne) and forall x (Packable(x) -> Improvise(x, jocelyne)) -> therefore Improvise(jocelyne, jocelyne) Packable(jocelyne) and Improvise(jocelyne, jocelyne) and forall x (Packable(x) and Improvise(x, jocelyne) -> Offset(x, jocelyne)) -> therefore Offset(jocelyne, jocelyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The dom is federated. The dom is raped. The dom is bumptious. The dom sabotage the saundra. The dom satisfice the saundra. The dom queer the saundra. The saundra is yellow. The saundra is raped. The saundra is dysplastic. The saundra sabotage the dom. The saundra satisfice the dom. The saundra queer the dom. If something sabotage the dom then it is yellow. If something is yellow and it sabotage the saundra then it satisfice the saundra. If something satisfice the saundra then it is federated. If something satisfice the saundra and it queer the saundra then it is bumptious. If something is yellow then it sabotage the saundra. If something queer the dom and the dom sabotage the saundra then the dom satisfice the saundra. If something sabotage the dom then the dom queer the saundra. If something is bumptious then it sabotage the saundra. The saundra is federated.", "logic": "\nFederated(dom)\nRaped(dom)\nBumptious(dom)\nSabotage(dom, saundra)\nSatisfice(dom, saundra)\nQueer(dom, saundra)\nYellow(saundra)\nRaped(saundra)\nDysplastic(saundra)\nSabotage(saundra, dom)\nSatisfice(saundra, dom)\nQueer(saundra, dom)\nforall x (Sabotage(x, dom) -> Yellow(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) and Sabotage(x, saundra) -> Satisfice(x, saundra))\nforall x (Satisfice(x, saundra) -> Federated(x))\nforall x (Satisfice(x, saundra) and Queer(x, saundra) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) -> Sabotage(x, saundra))\nforall x (Queer(x, dom) and Sabotage(dom, saundra) -> Satisfice(dom, saundra))\nforall x (Sabotage(x, dom) -> Queer(dom, saundra))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) -> Sabotage(x, saundra))\n\nFederated(saundra)\n\nYellow(saundra) and forall x (Yellow(x) -> Sabotage(x, saundra)) -> therefore Sabotage(saundra, saundra) Yellow(saundra) and Sabotage(saundra, saundra) and forall x (Yellow(x) and Sabotage(x, saundra) -> Satisfice(x, saundra)) -> therefore Satisfice(saundra, saundra) Satisfice(saundra, saundra) and forall x (Satisfice(x, saundra) -> Federated(x)) -> therefore Federated(saundra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The gabbie is tarsal. The gabbie is biface. The gabbie is tusked. The gabbie weight the junie. The gabbie nauseate the junie. The gabbie churr the junie. The junie is abhorrent. The junie is biface. The junie is triennial. The junie weight the gabbie. The junie nauseate the gabbie. The junie churr the gabbie. If something weight the gabbie then it is abhorrent. If something is abhorrent and it weight the junie then it nauseate the junie. If something nauseate the junie then it is tarsal. If something nauseate the junie and it churr the junie then it is tusked. If something is abhorrent then it weight the junie. If something churr the gabbie and the gabbie weight the junie then the gabbie nauseate the junie. If something weight the gabbie then the gabbie churr the junie. If something is tusked then it weight the junie. The junie is not tarsal.", "logic": "\nTarsal(gabbie)\nBiface(gabbie)\nTusked(gabbie)\nWeight(gabbie, junie)\nNauseate(gabbie, junie)\nChurr(gabbie, junie)\nAbhorrent(junie)\nBiface(junie)\nTriennial(junie)\nWeight(junie, gabbie)\nNauseate(junie, gabbie)\nChurr(junie, gabbie)\nforall x (Weight(x, gabbie) -> Abhorrent(x))\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) and Weight(x, junie) -> Nauseate(x, junie))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, junie) -> Tarsal(x))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, junie) and Churr(x, junie) -> Tusked(x))\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) -> Weight(x, junie))\nforall x (Churr(x, gabbie) and Weight(gabbie, junie) -> Nauseate(gabbie, junie))\nforall x (Weight(x, gabbie) -> Churr(gabbie, junie))\nforall x (Tusked(x) -> Weight(x, junie))\n\nnot Tarsal(junie)\n\nAbhorrent(junie) and forall x (Abhorrent(x) -> Weight(x, junie)) -> therefore Weight(junie, junie) Abhorrent(junie) and Weight(junie, junie) and forall x (Abhorrent(x) and Weight(x, junie) -> Nauseate(x, junie)) -> therefore Nauseate(junie, junie) Nauseate(junie, junie) and forall x (Nauseate(x, junie) -> Tarsal(x)) -> therefore Tarsal(junie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The christean is pasteurian. The christean is neckless. The christean is propelling. The christean simulate the cassondra. The christean beshrew the cassondra. The christean partner the cassondra. The cassondra is stunted. The cassondra is neckless. The cassondra is figural. The cassondra simulate the christean. The cassondra beshrew the christean. The cassondra partner the christean. If something simulate the christean then it is stunted. If something is stunted and it simulate the cassondra then it beshrew the cassondra. If something beshrew the cassondra then it is pasteurian. If something beshrew the cassondra and it partner the cassondra then it is propelling. If something is stunted then it simulate the cassondra. If something partner the christean and the christean simulate the cassondra then the christean beshrew the cassondra. If something simulate the christean then the christean partner the cassondra. If something is propelling then it simulate the cassondra. The christean is not stunted.", "logic": "\nPasteurian(christean)\nNeckless(christean)\nPropelling(christean)\nSimulate(christean, cassondra)\nBeshrew(christean, cassondra)\nPartner(christean, cassondra)\nStunted(cassondra)\nNeckless(cassondra)\nFigural(cassondra)\nSimulate(cassondra, christean)\nBeshrew(cassondra, christean)\nPartner(cassondra, christean)\nforall x (Simulate(x, christean) -> Stunted(x))\nforall x (Stunted(x) and Simulate(x, cassondra) -> Beshrew(x, cassondra))\nforall x (Beshrew(x, cassondra) -> Pasteurian(x))\nforall x (Beshrew(x, cassondra) and Partner(x, cassondra) -> Propelling(x))\nforall x (Stunted(x) -> Simulate(x, cassondra))\nforall x (Partner(x, christean) and Simulate(christean, cassondra) -> Beshrew(christean, cassondra))\nforall x (Simulate(x, christean) -> Partner(christean, cassondra))\nforall x (Propelling(x) -> Simulate(x, cassondra))\n\nnot Stunted(christean)\n\nforall x (Simulate(x, christean) -> Stunted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The charlena is anginal. The charlena is parametric. The charlena is epithelial. The charlena imbricate the ransell. The charlena bituminize the ransell. The charlena follow the ransell. The ransell is unmolested. The ransell is parametric. The ransell is abkhaz. The ransell imbricate the charlena. The ransell bituminize the charlena. The ransell follow the charlena. If something imbricate the charlena then it is unmolested. If something is unmolested and it imbricate the ransell then it bituminize the ransell. If something bituminize the ransell then it is anginal. If something bituminize the ransell and it follow the ransell then it is epithelial. If something is unmolested then it imbricate the ransell. If something follow the charlena and the charlena imbricate the ransell then the charlena bituminize the ransell. If something imbricate the charlena then the charlena follow the ransell. If something is epithelial then it imbricate the ransell. The ransell is epithelial.", "logic": "\nAnginal(charlena)\nParametric(charlena)\nEpithelial(charlena)\nImbricate(charlena, ransell)\nBituminize(charlena, ransell)\nFollow(charlena, ransell)\nUnmolested(ransell)\nParametric(ransell)\nAbkhaz(ransell)\nImbricate(ransell, charlena)\nBituminize(ransell, charlena)\nFollow(ransell, charlena)\nforall x (Imbricate(x, charlena) -> Unmolested(x))\nforall x (Unmolested(x) and Imbricate(x, ransell) -> Bituminize(x, ransell))\nforall x (Bituminize(x, ransell) -> Anginal(x))\nforall x (Bituminize(x, ransell) and Follow(x, ransell) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Unmolested(x) -> Imbricate(x, ransell))\nforall x (Follow(x, charlena) and Imbricate(charlena, ransell) -> Bituminize(charlena, ransell))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, charlena) -> Follow(charlena, ransell))\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> Imbricate(x, ransell))\n\nEpithelial(ransell)\n\nforall x (Bituminize(x, ransell) and Follow(x, ransell) -> Epithelial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The philly is dyslectic. The philly is hardcover. The philly is most. The philly movable the lenette. The philly ingraft the lenette. The philly beeswax the lenette. The lenette is movable. The lenette is hardcover. The lenette is metonymic. The lenette movable the philly. The lenette ingraft the philly. The lenette beeswax the philly. If something movable the philly then it is movable. If something is movable and it movable the lenette then it ingraft the lenette. If something ingraft the lenette then it is dyslectic. If something ingraft the lenette and it beeswax the lenette then it is most. If something is movable then it movable the lenette. If something beeswax the philly and the philly movable the lenette then the philly ingraft the lenette. If something movable the philly then the philly beeswax the lenette. If something is most then it movable the lenette. The philly is not metonymic.", "logic": "\nDyslectic(philly)\nHardcover(philly)\nMost(philly)\nBlue(philly, lenette)\nIngraft(philly, lenette)\nBeeswax(philly, lenette)\nMovable(lenette)\nHardcover(lenette)\nMetonymic(lenette)\nBlue(lenette, philly)\nIngraft(lenette, philly)\nBeeswax(lenette, philly)\nforall x (Blue(x, philly) -> Movable(x))\nforall x (Movable(x) and Blue(x, lenette) -> Ingraft(x, lenette))\nforall x (Ingraft(x, lenette) -> Dyslectic(x))\nforall x (Ingraft(x, lenette) and Beeswax(x, lenette) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Movable(x) -> Blue(x, lenette))\nforall x (Beeswax(x, philly) and Blue(philly, lenette) -> Ingraft(philly, lenette))\nforall x (Blue(x, philly) -> Beeswax(philly, lenette))\nforall x (Most(x) -> Blue(x, lenette))\n\nnot Metonymic(philly)\n\nnot Metonymic(philly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The joby is halt. The joby is penitent. The joby is heuristic. The joby charge the len. The joby atomize the len. The joby outgo the len. The len is gauche. The len is penitent. The len is chartered. The len charge the joby. The len atomize the joby. The len outgo the joby. If something charge the joby then it is gauche. If something is gauche and it charge the len then it atomize the len. If something atomize the len then it is halt. If something atomize the len and it outgo the len then it is heuristic. If something is gauche then it charge the len. If something outgo the joby and the joby charge the len then the joby atomize the len. If something charge the joby then the joby outgo the len. If something is heuristic then it charge the len. The joby outgo the joby.", "logic": "\nHalt(joby)\nPenitent(joby)\nHeuristic(joby)\nCharge(joby, len)\nAtomize(joby, len)\nOutgo(joby, len)\nGauche(len)\nPenitent(len)\nChartered(len)\nCharge(len, joby)\nAtomize(len, joby)\nOutgo(len, joby)\nforall x (Charge(x, joby) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Charge(x, len) -> Atomize(x, len))\nforall x (Atomize(x, len) -> Halt(x))\nforall x (Atomize(x, len) and Outgo(x, len) -> Heuristic(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Charge(x, len))\nforall x (Outgo(x, joby) and Charge(joby, len) -> Atomize(joby, len))\nforall x (Charge(x, joby) -> Outgo(joby, len))\nforall x (Heuristic(x) -> Charge(x, len))\n\nOutgo(joby, joby)\n\nOutgo(joby, joby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The leandra is allegoric. The leandra is innocuous. The leandra is littoral. The leandra torment the udale. The leandra itinerate the udale. The leandra summer the udale. The udale is forgivable. The udale is innocuous. The udale is coetaneous. The udale torment the leandra. The udale itinerate the leandra. The udale summer the leandra. If something torment the leandra then it is forgivable. If something is forgivable and it torment the udale then it itinerate the udale. If something itinerate the udale then it is allegoric. If something itinerate the udale and it summer the udale then it is littoral. If something is forgivable then it torment the udale. If something summer the leandra and the leandra torment the udale then the leandra itinerate the udale. If something torment the leandra then the leandra summer the udale. If something is littoral then it torment the udale. The udale does not visit the udale.", "logic": "\nAllegoric(leandra)\nInnocuous(leandra)\nLittoral(leandra)\nTorment(leandra, udale)\nItinerate(leandra, udale)\nSummer(leandra, udale)\nForgivable(udale)\nInnocuous(udale)\nCoetaneous(udale)\nTorment(udale, leandra)\nItinerate(udale, leandra)\nSummer(udale, leandra)\nforall x (Torment(x, leandra) -> Forgivable(x))\nforall x (Forgivable(x) and Torment(x, udale) -> Itinerate(x, udale))\nforall x (Itinerate(x, udale) -> Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Itinerate(x, udale) and Summer(x, udale) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Forgivable(x) -> Torment(x, udale))\nforall x (Summer(x, leandra) and Torment(leandra, udale) -> Itinerate(leandra, udale))\nforall x (Torment(x, leandra) -> Summer(leandra, udale))\nforall x (Littoral(x) -> Torment(x, udale))\n\nnot Summer(udale, udale)\n\nnot Summer(udale, udale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The saunders is fourhanded. The saunders is comely. The saunders is blithesome. The saunders tenure the sibbie. The saunders mambo the sibbie. The saunders quantize the sibbie. The sibbie is irregular. The sibbie is comely. The sibbie is crapulent. The sibbie tenure the saunders. The sibbie mambo the saunders. The sibbie quantize the saunders. If something tenure the saunders then it is irregular. If something is irregular and it tenure the sibbie then it mambo the sibbie. If something mambo the sibbie then it is fourhanded. If something mambo the sibbie and it quantize the sibbie then it is blithesome. If something is irregular then it tenure the sibbie. If something quantize the saunders and the saunders tenure the sibbie then the saunders mambo the sibbie. If something tenure the saunders then the saunders quantize the sibbie. If something is blithesome then it tenure the sibbie. The saunders tenure the saunders.", "logic": "\nFourhanded(saunders)\nComely(saunders)\nBlithesome(saunders)\nTenure(saunders, sibbie)\nMambo(saunders, sibbie)\nQuantize(saunders, sibbie)\nIrregular(sibbie)\nComely(sibbie)\nCrapulent(sibbie)\nTenure(sibbie, saunders)\nMambo(sibbie, saunders)\nQuantize(sibbie, saunders)\nforall x (Tenure(x, saunders) -> Irregular(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) and Tenure(x, sibbie) -> Mambo(x, sibbie))\nforall x (Mambo(x, sibbie) -> Fourhanded(x))\nforall x (Mambo(x, sibbie) and Quantize(x, sibbie) -> Blithesome(x))\nforall x (Irregular(x) -> Tenure(x, sibbie))\nforall x (Quantize(x, saunders) and Tenure(saunders, sibbie) -> Mambo(saunders, sibbie))\nforall x (Tenure(x, saunders) -> Quantize(saunders, sibbie))\nforall x (Blithesome(x) -> Tenure(x, sibbie))\n\nTenure(saunders, saunders)\n\nTenure(saunders, saunders) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The raine salt the melisa. The raine is teachable. The raine allowance the melisa. The winonah allowance the raine. The winonah allowance the melisa. The melisa salt the winonah. The melisa is basic. If something salt the raine and the raine salt the melisa then it allowance the winonah. If something salt the winonah then the winonah severalize the raine. If something severalize the raine then it salt the raine. The winonah allowance the melisa.", "logic": "\nSalt(raine, melisa)\nTeachable(raine)\nAllowance(raine, melisa)\nAllowance(winonah, raine)\nAllowance(winonah, melisa)\nSalt(melisa, winonah)\nBasic(melisa)\nforall x (Salt(x, raine) and Salt(raine, melisa) -> Allowance(x, winonah))\nforall x (Salt(x, winonah) -> Severalize(winonah, raine))\nforall x (Severalize(x, raine) -> Salt(x, raine))\n\nAllowance(winonah, melisa)\n\ntherefore Allowance(winonah, melisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The parnell savvy the lianne. The parnell is chartless. The parnell kayo the lianne. The chadd kayo the parnell. The chadd kayo the lianne. The lianne savvy the chadd. The lianne is unfeigned. If something savvy the parnell and the parnell savvy the lianne then it kayo the chadd. If something savvy the chadd then the chadd embed the parnell. If something embed the parnell then it savvy the parnell. The lianne does not eat the chadd.", "logic": "\nSavvy(parnell, lianne)\nChartless(parnell)\nKayo(parnell, lianne)\nKayo(chadd, parnell)\nKayo(chadd, lianne)\nSavvy(lianne, chadd)\nUnfeigned(lianne)\nforall x (Savvy(x, parnell) and Savvy(parnell, lianne) -> Kayo(x, chadd))\nforall x (Savvy(x, chadd) -> Embed(chadd, parnell))\nforall x (Embed(x, parnell) -> Savvy(x, parnell))\n\nnot Savvy(lianne, chadd)\n\ntherefore Savvy(lianne, chadd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The rebbecca adjudicate the betta. The rebbecca is naiant. The rebbecca jangle the betta. The casey jangle the rebbecca. The casey jangle the betta. The betta adjudicate the casey. The betta is interested. If something adjudicate the rebbecca and the rebbecca adjudicate the betta then it jangle the casey. If something adjudicate the casey then the casey catalogue the rebbecca. If something catalogue the rebbecca then it adjudicate the rebbecca. The casey catalogue the rebbecca.", "logic": "\nAdjudicate(rebbecca, betta)\nNaiant(rebbecca)\nJangle(rebbecca, betta)\nJangle(casey, rebbecca)\nJangle(casey, betta)\nAdjudicate(betta, casey)\nInterested(betta)\nforall x (Adjudicate(x, rebbecca) and Adjudicate(rebbecca, betta) -> Jangle(x, casey))\nforall x (Adjudicate(x, casey) -> Catalogue(casey, rebbecca))\nforall x (Catalogue(x, rebbecca) -> Adjudicate(x, rebbecca))\n\nCatalogue(casey, rebbecca)\n\nAdjudicate(betta, casey) and forall x (Adjudicate(x, casey) -> Catalogue(casey, rebbecca)) -> therefore Catalogue(casey, rebbecca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The dorey reconcile the sidney. The dorey is conic. The dorey assent the sidney. The joseph assent the dorey. The joseph assent the sidney. The sidney reconcile the joseph. The sidney is seventy. If something reconcile the dorey and the dorey reconcile the sidney then it assent the joseph. If something reconcile the joseph then the joseph vaticinate the dorey. If something vaticinate the dorey then it reconcile the dorey. The joseph does not need the dorey.", "logic": "\nReconcile(dorey, sidney)\nConic(dorey)\nAssent(dorey, sidney)\nAssent(joseph, dorey)\nAssent(joseph, sidney)\nReconcile(sidney, joseph)\nSeventy(sidney)\nforall x (Reconcile(x, dorey) and Reconcile(dorey, sidney) -> Assent(x, joseph))\nforall x (Reconcile(x, joseph) -> Vaticinate(joseph, dorey))\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, dorey) -> Reconcile(x, dorey))\n\nnot Vaticinate(joseph, dorey)\n\nReconcile(sidney, joseph) and forall x (Reconcile(x, joseph) -> Vaticinate(joseph, dorey)) -> therefore Vaticinate(joseph, dorey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The sam surmise the astrid. The sam is affixal. The sam apportion the astrid. The barclay apportion the sam. The barclay apportion the astrid. The astrid surmise the barclay. The astrid is fragmental. If something surmise the sam and the sam surmise the astrid then it apportion the barclay. If something surmise the barclay then the barclay delve the sam. If something delve the sam then it surmise the sam. The barclay surmise the sam.", "logic": "\nSurmise(sam, astrid)\nAffixal(sam)\nApportion(sam, astrid)\nApportion(barclay, sam)\nApportion(barclay, astrid)\nSurmise(astrid, barclay)\nFragmental(astrid)\nforall x (Surmise(x, sam) and Surmise(sam, astrid) -> Apportion(x, barclay))\nforall x (Surmise(x, barclay) -> Delve(barclay, sam))\nforall x (Delve(x, sam) -> Surmise(x, sam))\n\nSurmise(barclay, sam)\n\nSurmise(astrid, barclay) and forall x (Surmise(x, barclay) -> Delve(barclay, sam)) -> therefore Delve(barclay, sam) Delve(barclay, sam) and forall x (Delve(x, sam) -> Surmise(x, sam)) -> therefore Surmise(barclay, sam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The nikkie whack the katey. The nikkie is fungicidal. The nikkie gnash the katey. The hanson gnash the nikkie. The hanson gnash the katey. The katey whack the hanson. The katey is pleochroic. If something whack the nikkie and the nikkie whack the katey then it gnash the hanson. If something whack the hanson then the hanson guffaw the nikkie. If something guffaw the nikkie then it whack the nikkie. The hanson does not eat the nikkie.", "logic": "\nWhack(nikkie, katey)\nFungicidal(nikkie)\nGnash(nikkie, katey)\nGnash(hanson, nikkie)\nGnash(hanson, katey)\nWhack(katey, hanson)\nPleochroic(katey)\nforall x (Whack(x, nikkie) and Whack(nikkie, katey) -> Gnash(x, hanson))\nforall x (Whack(x, hanson) -> Guffaw(hanson, nikkie))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, nikkie) -> Whack(x, nikkie))\n\nnot Whack(hanson, nikkie)\n\nWhack(katey, hanson) and forall x (Whack(x, hanson) -> Guffaw(hanson, nikkie)) -> therefore Guffaw(hanson, nikkie) Guffaw(hanson, nikkie) and forall x (Guffaw(x, nikkie) -> Whack(x, nikkie)) -> therefore Whack(hanson, nikkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The xaviera lambast the marko. The xaviera is allotropic. The xaviera nosedive the marko. The hyacinthe nosedive the xaviera. The hyacinthe nosedive the marko. The marko lambast the hyacinthe. The marko is snarly. If something lambast the xaviera and the xaviera lambast the marko then it nosedive the hyacinthe. If something lambast the hyacinthe then the hyacinthe inculcate the xaviera. If something inculcate the xaviera then it lambast the xaviera. The hyacinthe nosedive the hyacinthe.", "logic": "\nLambast(xaviera, marko)\nAllotropic(xaviera)\nNosedive(xaviera, marko)\nNosedive(hyacinthe, xaviera)\nNosedive(hyacinthe, marko)\nLambast(marko, hyacinthe)\nSnarly(marko)\nforall x (Lambast(x, xaviera) and Lambast(xaviera, marko) -> Nosedive(x, hyacinthe))\nforall x (Lambast(x, hyacinthe) -> Inculcate(hyacinthe, xaviera))\nforall x (Inculcate(x, xaviera) -> Lambast(x, xaviera))\n\nNosedive(hyacinthe, hyacinthe)\n\nLambast(marko, hyacinthe) and forall x (Lambast(x, hyacinthe) -> Inculcate(hyacinthe, xaviera)) -> therefore Inculcate(hyacinthe, xaviera) Inculcate(hyacinthe, xaviera) and forall x (Inculcate(x, xaviera) -> Lambast(x, xaviera)) -> therefore Lambast(hyacinthe, xaviera) Lambast(hyacinthe, xaviera) and Lambast(xaviera, marko) and forall x (Lambast(x, xaviera) and Lambast(xaviera, marko) -> Nosedive(x, hyacinthe)) -> therefore Nosedive(hyacinthe, hyacinthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The etty pulverize the joni. The etty is crispate. The etty unnerve the joni. The lay unnerve the etty. The lay unnerve the joni. The joni pulverize the lay. The joni is mongol. If something pulverize the etty and the etty pulverize the joni then it unnerve the lay. If something pulverize the lay then the lay diminish the etty. If something diminish the etty then it pulverize the etty. The lay does not like the lay.", "logic": "\nPulverize(etty, joni)\nCrispate(etty)\nUnnerve(etty, joni)\nUnnerve(lay, etty)\nUnnerve(lay, joni)\nPulverize(joni, lay)\nMongol(joni)\nforall x (Pulverize(x, etty) and Pulverize(etty, joni) -> Unnerve(x, lay))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, lay) -> Diminish(lay, etty))\nforall x (Diminish(x, etty) -> Pulverize(x, etty))\n\nnot Unnerve(lay, lay)\n\nPulverize(joni, lay) and forall x (Pulverize(x, lay) -> Diminish(lay, etty)) -> therefore Diminish(lay, etty) Diminish(lay, etty) and forall x (Diminish(x, etty) -> Pulverize(x, etty)) -> therefore Pulverize(lay, etty) Pulverize(lay, etty) and Pulverize(etty, joni) and forall x (Pulverize(x, etty) and Pulverize(etty, joni) -> Unnerve(x, lay)) -> therefore Unnerve(lay, lay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The nerissa alkalise the duke. The nerissa is catechetic. The nerissa clothe the duke. The ignace clothe the nerissa. The ignace clothe the duke. The duke alkalise the ignace. The duke is euphonious. If something alkalise the nerissa and the nerissa alkalise the duke then it clothe the ignace. If something alkalise the ignace then the ignace cruise the nerissa. If something cruise the nerissa then it alkalise the nerissa. The nerissa does not eat the nerissa.", "logic": "\nAlkalise(nerissa, duke)\nCatechetic(nerissa)\nClothe(nerissa, duke)\nClothe(ignace, nerissa)\nClothe(ignace, duke)\nAlkalise(duke, ignace)\nEuphonious(duke)\nforall x (Alkalise(x, nerissa) and Alkalise(nerissa, duke) -> Clothe(x, ignace))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, ignace) -> Cruise(ignace, nerissa))\nforall x (Cruise(x, nerissa) -> Alkalise(x, nerissa))\n\nnot Alkalise(nerissa, nerissa)\n\nforall x (Cruise(x, nerissa) -> Alkalise(x, nerissa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The tova extract the genia. The tova is cropped. The tova typeset the genia. The dayle typeset the tova. The dayle typeset the genia. The genia extract the dayle. The genia is viviparous. If something extract the tova and the tova extract the genia then it typeset the dayle. If something extract the dayle then the dayle nasalize the tova. If something nasalize the tova then it extract the tova. The genia typeset the dayle.", "logic": "\nExtract(tova, genia)\nCropped(tova)\nTypeset(tova, genia)\nTypeset(dayle, tova)\nTypeset(dayle, genia)\nExtract(genia, dayle)\nViviparous(genia)\nforall x (Extract(x, tova) and Extract(tova, genia) -> Typeset(x, dayle))\nforall x (Extract(x, dayle) -> Nasalize(dayle, tova))\nforall x (Nasalize(x, tova) -> Extract(x, tova))\n\nTypeset(genia, dayle)\n\nforall x (Extract(x, tova) and Extract(tova, genia) -> Typeset(x, dayle)) <- forall x (Nasalize(x, tova) -> Extract(x, tova)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The tamma rumor the layne. The tamma is swazi. The tamma persist the layne. The ellynn persist the tamma. The ellynn persist the layne. The layne rumor the ellynn. The layne is cambial. If something rumor the tamma and the tamma rumor the layne then it persist the ellynn. If something rumor the ellynn then the ellynn surveil the tamma. If something surveil the tamma then it rumor the tamma. The tamma does not like the ellynn.", "logic": "\nRumor(tamma, layne)\nSwazi(tamma)\nPersist(tamma, layne)\nPersist(ellynn, tamma)\nPersist(ellynn, layne)\nRumor(layne, ellynn)\nCambial(layne)\nforall x (Rumor(x, tamma) and Rumor(tamma, layne) -> Persist(x, ellynn))\nforall x (Rumor(x, ellynn) -> Surveil(ellynn, tamma))\nforall x (Surveil(x, tamma) -> Rumor(x, tamma))\n\nnot Persist(tamma, ellynn)\n\nforall x (Rumor(x, tamma) and Rumor(tamma, layne) -> Persist(x, ellynn)) <- forall x (Surveil(x, tamma) -> Rumor(x, tamma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The zonnya tram the kerianne. The zonnya is runny. The zonnya outnumber the kerianne. The myrle outnumber the zonnya. The myrle outnumber the kerianne. The kerianne tram the myrle. The kerianne is cheapjack. If something tram the zonnya and the zonnya tram the kerianne then it outnumber the myrle. If something tram the myrle then the myrle bootstrap the zonnya. If something bootstrap the zonnya then it tram the zonnya. The kerianne tram the zonnya.", "logic": "\nTram(zonnya, kerianne)\nRunny(zonnya)\nOutnumber(zonnya, kerianne)\nOutnumber(myrle, zonnya)\nOutnumber(myrle, kerianne)\nTram(kerianne, myrle)\nCheapjack(kerianne)\nforall x (Tram(x, zonnya) and Tram(zonnya, kerianne) -> Outnumber(x, myrle))\nforall x (Tram(x, myrle) -> Bootstrap(myrle, zonnya))\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, zonnya) -> Tram(x, zonnya))\n\nTram(kerianne, zonnya)\n\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, zonnya) -> Tram(x, zonnya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The westbrook alloy the shaina. The westbrook is requisite. The westbrook jabber the shaina. The fatima jabber the westbrook. The fatima jabber the shaina. The shaina alloy the fatima. The shaina is yuman. If something alloy the westbrook and the westbrook alloy the shaina then it jabber the fatima. If something alloy the fatima then the fatima defog the westbrook. If something defog the westbrook then it alloy the westbrook. The shaina does not like the westbrook.", "logic": "\nAlloy(westbrook, shaina)\nRequisite(westbrook)\nJabber(westbrook, shaina)\nJabber(fatima, westbrook)\nJabber(fatima, shaina)\nAlloy(shaina, fatima)\nYuman(shaina)\nforall x (Alloy(x, westbrook) and Alloy(westbrook, shaina) -> Jabber(x, fatima))\nforall x (Alloy(x, fatima) -> Defog(fatima, westbrook))\nforall x (Defog(x, westbrook) -> Alloy(x, westbrook))\n\nnot Jabber(shaina, westbrook)\n\nnot Jabber(shaina, westbrook) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The marget exile the aida. The marget is crumbly. The marget peel the aida. The dyane peel the marget. The dyane peel the aida. The aida exile the dyane. The aida is lowbrow. If something exile the marget and the marget exile the aida then it peel the dyane. If something exile the dyane then the dyane lustrate the marget. If something lustrate the marget then it exile the marget. The aida lustrate the aida.", "logic": "\nExile(marget, aida)\nCrumbly(marget)\nPeel(marget, aida)\nPeel(dyane, marget)\nPeel(dyane, aida)\nExile(aida, dyane)\nLowbrow(aida)\nforall x (Exile(x, marget) and Exile(marget, aida) -> Peel(x, dyane))\nforall x (Exile(x, dyane) -> Lustrate(dyane, marget))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, marget) -> Exile(x, marget))\n\nLustrate(aida, aida)\n\nLustrate(aida, aida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The darline boob the elianora. The darline is wysiwyg. The darline adjoin the elianora. The celestina adjoin the darline. The celestina adjoin the elianora. The elianora boob the celestina. The elianora is deft. If something boob the darline and the darline boob the elianora then it adjoin the celestina. If something boob the celestina then the celestina approve the darline. If something approve the darline then it boob the darline. The darline does not need the darline.", "logic": "\nBoob(darline, elianora)\nWysiwyg(darline)\nAdjoin(darline, elianora)\nAdjoin(celestina, darline)\nAdjoin(celestina, elianora)\nBoob(elianora, celestina)\nDeft(elianora)\nforall x (Boob(x, darline) and Boob(darline, elianora) -> Adjoin(x, celestina))\nforall x (Boob(x, celestina) -> Approve(celestina, darline))\nforall x (Approve(x, darline) -> Boob(x, darline))\n\nnot Approve(darline, darline)\n\nnot Approve(darline, darline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The toddy grace the almeda. The toddy is stormbound. The toddy instal the almeda. The hurley instal the toddy. The hurley instal the almeda. The almeda grace the hurley. The almeda is dioecious. If something grace the toddy and the toddy grace the almeda then it instal the hurley. If something grace the hurley then the hurley copulate the toddy. If something copulate the toddy then it grace the toddy. The almeda is stormbound.", "logic": "\nGrace(toddy, almeda)\nStormbound(toddy)\nInstal(toddy, almeda)\nInstal(hurley, toddy)\nInstal(hurley, almeda)\nGrace(almeda, hurley)\nDioecious(almeda)\nforall x (Grace(x, toddy) and Grace(toddy, almeda) -> Instal(x, hurley))\nforall x (Grace(x, hurley) -> Copulate(hurley, toddy))\nforall x (Copulate(x, toddy) -> Grace(x, toddy))\n\nStormbound(almeda)\n\nStormbound(almeda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "Marie is likable. Nerissa is not derogatory. Rozele is outlined. If Nerissa is not lightproof then Nerissa is not prefab. All outlined things are derogatory. White, likable things are derogatory. If Rozele is outlined and Rozele is lightproof then Rozele is mannered. All jamesian things are prefab. If Rozele is derogatory then Rozele is jamesian. Rozele is outlined.", "logic": "\nLikable(marie)\nnot Derogatory(nerissa)\nOutlined(rozele)\nnot Lightproof(nerissa) -> not Prefab(nerissa)\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> Derogatory(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) and Likable(x) -> Derogatory(x))\nOutlined(rozele) and Lightproof(rozele) -> Mannered(rozele)\nforall x (Jamesian(x) -> Prefab(x))\nDerogatory(rozele) -> Jamesian(rozele)\n\nOutlined(rozele)\n\ntherefore Outlined(rozele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Liz is connective. Lanny is not gustatory. Bartel is strict. If Lanny is not beguiled then Lanny is not receptive. All strict things are gustatory. White, connective things are gustatory. If Bartel is strict and Bartel is beguiled then Bartel is protozoic. All limbless things are receptive. If Bartel is gustatory then Bartel is limbless. Lanny is gustatory.", "logic": "\nConnective(liz)\nnot Gustatory(lanny)\nStrict(bartel)\nnot Beguiled(lanny) -> not Receptive(lanny)\nforall x (Strict(x) -> Gustatory(x))\nforall x (Receptive(x) and Connective(x) -> Gustatory(x))\nStrict(bartel) and Beguiled(bartel) -> Protozoic(bartel)\nforall x (Limbless(x) -> Receptive(x))\nGustatory(bartel) -> Limbless(bartel)\n\nGustatory(lanny)\n\ntherefore not Gustatory(lanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Kim is astral. Lanita is not extremist. Karola is unbaptised. If Lanita is not borated then Lanita is not imaginable. All unbaptised things are extremist. White, astral things are extremist. If Karola is unbaptised and Karola is borated then Karola is roughish. All roily things are imaginable. If Karola is extremist then Karola is roily. Karola is extremist.", "logic": "\nAstral(kim)\nnot Extremist(lanita)\nUnbaptised(karola)\nnot Borated(lanita) -> not Imaginable(lanita)\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Extremist(x))\nforall x (Imaginable(x) and Astral(x) -> Extremist(x))\nUnbaptised(karola) and Borated(karola) -> Roughish(karola)\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Imaginable(x))\nExtremist(karola) -> Roily(karola)\n\nExtremist(karola)\n\nUnbaptised(karola) and forall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Extremist(x)) -> therefore Extremist(karola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Cloris is weeny. Iona is not noetic. Adolph is renewable. If Iona is not cherry then Iona is not brainless. All renewable things are noetic. White, weeny things are noetic. If Adolph is renewable and Adolph is cherry then Adolph is polyphase. All bouncy things are brainless. If Adolph is noetic then Adolph is bouncy. Adolph is not noetic.", "logic": "\nWeeny(cloris)\nnot Noetic(iona)\nRenewable(adolph)\nnot Cherry(iona) -> not Brainless(iona)\nforall x (Renewable(x) -> Noetic(x))\nforall x (Brainless(x) and Weeny(x) -> Noetic(x))\nRenewable(adolph) and Cherry(adolph) -> Polyphase(adolph)\nforall x (Bouncy(x) -> Brainless(x))\nNoetic(adolph) -> Bouncy(adolph)\n\nnot Noetic(adolph)\n\nRenewable(adolph) and forall x (Renewable(x) -> Noetic(x)) -> therefore Noetic(adolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Flossy is sacral. Alfonzo is not faltering. Thibaut is peckish. If Alfonzo is not interested then Alfonzo is not slatey. All peckish things are faltering. White, sacral things are faltering. If Thibaut is peckish and Thibaut is interested then Thibaut is horrific. All nonsense things are slatey. If Thibaut is faltering then Thibaut is nonsense. Thibaut is nonsense.", "logic": "\nSacral(flossy)\nnot Faltering(alfonzo)\nPeckish(thibaut)\nnot Interested(alfonzo) -> not Slatey(alfonzo)\nforall x (Peckish(x) -> Faltering(x))\nforall x (Slatey(x) and Sacral(x) -> Faltering(x))\nPeckish(thibaut) and Interested(thibaut) -> Horrific(thibaut)\nforall x (Nonsense(x) -> Slatey(x))\nFaltering(thibaut) -> Nonsense(thibaut)\n\nNonsense(thibaut)\n\nPeckish(thibaut) and forall x (Peckish(x) -> Faltering(x)) -> therefore Faltering(thibaut) Faltering(thibaut) and Faltering(thibaut) -> Nonsense(thibaut) -> therefore Nonsense(thibaut)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Shellie is cloudless. Emile is not economical. Ephram is upbound. If Emile is not speakable then Emile is not hunted. All upbound things are economical. White, cloudless things are economical. If Ephram is upbound and Ephram is speakable then Ephram is inapposite. All inferior things are hunted. If Ephram is economical then Ephram is inferior. Ephram is not inferior.", "logic": "\nCloudless(shellie)\nnot Economical(emile)\nUpbound(ephram)\nnot Speakable(emile) -> not Hunted(emile)\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Economical(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) and Cloudless(x) -> Economical(x))\nUpbound(ephram) and Speakable(ephram) -> Inapposite(ephram)\nforall x (Inferior(x) -> Hunted(x))\nEconomical(ephram) -> Inferior(ephram)\n\nnot Inferior(ephram)\n\nUpbound(ephram) and forall x (Upbound(x) -> Economical(x)) -> therefore Economical(ephram) Economical(ephram) and Economical(ephram) -> Inferior(ephram) -> therefore Inferior(ephram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Dabney is tamil. Natalina is not similar. Trixie is cassocked. If Natalina is not incertain then Natalina is not hagridden. All cassocked things are similar. White, tamil things are similar. If Trixie is cassocked and Trixie is incertain then Trixie is apologetic. All lutheran things are hagridden. If Trixie is similar then Trixie is lutheran. Trixie is hagridden.", "logic": "\nTamil(dabney)\nnot Similar(natalina)\nCassocked(trixie)\nnot Incertain(natalina) -> not Hagridden(natalina)\nforall x (Cassocked(x) -> Similar(x))\nforall x (Hagridden(x) and Tamil(x) -> Similar(x))\nCassocked(trixie) and Incertain(trixie) -> Apologetic(trixie)\nforall x (Lutheran(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nSimilar(trixie) -> Lutheran(trixie)\n\nHagridden(trixie)\n\nCassocked(trixie) and forall x (Cassocked(x) -> Similar(x)) -> therefore Similar(trixie) Similar(trixie) and Similar(trixie) -> Lutheran(trixie) -> therefore Lutheran(trixie) Lutheran(trixie) and forall x (Lutheran(x) -> Hagridden(x)) -> therefore Hagridden(trixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Lucas is tzarist. Collie is not scenic. Isa is interlaced. If Collie is not locomotive then Collie is not indie. All interlaced things are scenic. White, tzarist things are scenic. If Isa is interlaced and Isa is locomotive then Isa is ventral. All spinous things are indie. If Isa is scenic then Isa is spinous. Isa is not indie.", "logic": "\nTzarist(lucas)\nnot Scenic(collie)\nInterlaced(isa)\nnot Locomotive(collie) -> not Indie(collie)\nforall x (Interlaced(x) -> Scenic(x))\nforall x (Indie(x) and Tzarist(x) -> Scenic(x))\nInterlaced(isa) and Locomotive(isa) -> Ventral(isa)\nforall x (Spinous(x) -> Indie(x))\nScenic(isa) -> Spinous(isa)\n\nnot Indie(isa)\n\nInterlaced(isa) and forall x (Interlaced(x) -> Scenic(x)) -> therefore Scenic(isa) Scenic(isa) and Scenic(isa) -> Spinous(isa) -> therefore Spinous(isa) Spinous(isa) and forall x (Spinous(x) -> Indie(x)) -> therefore Indie(isa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Harri is itchy. Myrle is not copernican. Jeanelle is nodulose. If Myrle is not nonplused then Myrle is not adaxial. All nodulose things are copernican. White, itchy things are copernican. If Jeanelle is nodulose and Jeanelle is nonplused then Jeanelle is hobnailed. All rabbinical things are adaxial. If Jeanelle is copernican then Jeanelle is rabbinical. Harri is not adaxial.", "logic": "\nItchy(harri)\nnot Copernican(myrle)\nNodulose(jeanelle)\nnot Nonplused(myrle) -> not Adaxial(myrle)\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Copernican(x))\nforall x (Adaxial(x) and Itchy(x) -> Copernican(x))\nNodulose(jeanelle) and Nonplused(jeanelle) -> Hobnailed(jeanelle)\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Adaxial(x))\nCopernican(jeanelle) -> Rabbinical(jeanelle)\n\nnot Adaxial(harri)\n\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Adaxial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Dyanna is kenyan. Timothea is not symphonic. Ignacio is inspired. If Timothea is not torpid then Timothea is not breastless. All inspired things are symphonic. White, kenyan things are symphonic. If Ignacio is inspired and Ignacio is torpid then Ignacio is ruthless. All lymphoid things are breastless. If Ignacio is symphonic then Ignacio is lymphoid. Timothea is breastless.", "logic": "\nKenyan(dyanna)\nnot Symphonic(timothea)\nInspired(ignacio)\nnot Torpid(timothea) -> not Breastless(timothea)\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Symphonic(x))\nforall x (Breastless(x) and Kenyan(x) -> Symphonic(x))\nInspired(ignacio) and Torpid(ignacio) -> Ruthless(ignacio)\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Breastless(x))\nSymphonic(ignacio) -> Lymphoid(ignacio)\n\nBreastless(timothea)\n\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Breastless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Allyn is hugoesque. Rivkah is not misshapen. Cheri is unhindered. If Rivkah is not procurable then Rivkah is not saxicolous. All unhindered things are misshapen. White, hugoesque things are misshapen. If Cheri is unhindered and Cheri is procurable then Cheri is benighted. All centigrade things are saxicolous. If Cheri is misshapen then Cheri is centigrade. Allyn is not misshapen.", "logic": "\nHugoesque(allyn)\nnot Misshapen(rivkah)\nUnhindered(cheri)\nnot Procurable(rivkah) -> not Saxicolous(rivkah)\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Hugoesque(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nUnhindered(cheri) and Procurable(cheri) -> Benighted(cheri)\nforall x (Centigrade(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nMisshapen(cheri) -> Centigrade(cheri)\n\nnot Misshapen(allyn)\n\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Hugoesque(x) -> Misshapen(x)) <- forall x (Centigrade(x) -> Saxicolous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Vonny is gossamer. Karol is not beginning. Perrine is outcaste. If Karol is not converse then Karol is not dictated. All outcaste things are beginning. White, gossamer things are beginning. If Perrine is outcaste and Perrine is converse then Perrine is undersexed. All swazi things are dictated. If Perrine is beginning then Perrine is swazi. Perrine is undersexed.", "logic": "\nGossamer(vonny)\nnot Beginning(karol)\nOutcaste(perrine)\nnot Converse(karol) -> not Dictated(karol)\nforall x (Outcaste(x) -> Beginning(x))\nforall x (Dictated(x) and Gossamer(x) -> Beginning(x))\nOutcaste(perrine) and Converse(perrine) -> Undersexed(perrine)\nforall x (Swazi(x) -> Dictated(x))\nBeginning(perrine) -> Swazi(perrine)\n\nUndersexed(perrine)\n\nOutcaste(perrine) and Converse(perrine) -> Undersexed(perrine) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Reuven is overt. Red is not generous. Averil is pious. If Red is not numberless then Red is not groovy. All pious things are generous. White, overt things are generous. If Averil is pious and Averil is numberless then Averil is flighted. All pied things are groovy. If Averil is generous then Averil is pied. Red is not numberless.", "logic": "\nOvert(reuven)\nnot Generous(red)\nPious(averil)\nnot Numberless(red) -> not Groovy(red)\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Groovy(x) and Overt(x) -> Generous(x))\nPious(averil) and Numberless(averil) -> Flighted(averil)\nforall x (Pied(x) -> Groovy(x))\nGenerous(averil) -> Pied(averil)\n\nnot Numberless(red)\n\nnot Numberless(red) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Justis is feudal. Wyatt is not perennial. Odella is secular. If Wyatt is not ventilated then Wyatt is not antisocial. All secular things are perennial. White, feudal things are perennial. If Odella is secular and Odella is ventilated then Odella is unstuck. All sequential things are antisocial. If Odella is perennial then Odella is sequential. Wyatt is secular.", "logic": "\nFeudal(justis)\nnot Perennial(wyatt)\nSecular(odella)\nnot Ventilated(wyatt) -> not Antisocial(wyatt)\nforall x (Secular(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Antisocial(x) and Feudal(x) -> Perennial(x))\nSecular(odella) and Ventilated(odella) -> Unstuck(odella)\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nPerennial(odella) -> Sequential(odella)\n\nSecular(wyatt)\n\nSecular(wyatt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Halvard is returning. Joao is not repeated. Kissie is runny. If Joao is not squinting then Joao is not fictitious. All runny things are repeated. White, returning things are repeated. If Kissie is runny and Kissie is squinting then Kissie is laid. All boxlike things are fictitious. If Kissie is repeated then Kissie is boxlike. Kissie is not squinting.", "logic": "\nReturning(halvard)\nnot Repeated(joao)\nRunny(kissie)\nnot Squinting(joao) -> not Fictitious(joao)\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Repeated(x))\nforall x (Fictitious(x) and Returning(x) -> Repeated(x))\nRunny(kissie) and Squinting(kissie) -> Laid(kissie)\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nRepeated(kissie) -> Boxlike(kissie)\n\nnot Squinting(kissie)\n\nnot Squinting(kissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Annabelle is stranded. Ike is not registered. Leanna is sweeping. If Ike is not histrionic then Ike is not linked. All sweeping things are registered. White, stranded things are registered. If Leanna is sweeping and Leanna is histrionic then Leanna is cornish. All grassless things are linked. If Leanna is registered then Leanna is grassless. Annabelle is sweeping.", "logic": "\nStranded(annabelle)\nnot Registered(ike)\nSweeping(leanna)\nnot Histrionic(ike) -> not Linked(ike)\nforall x (Sweeping(x) -> Registered(x))\nforall x (Linked(x) and Stranded(x) -> Registered(x))\nSweeping(leanna) and Histrionic(leanna) -> Cornish(leanna)\nforall x (Grassless(x) -> Linked(x))\nRegistered(leanna) -> Grassless(leanna)\n\nSweeping(annabelle)\n\nSweeping(annabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "The elisabeth district the kizzee. The elisabeth is skewed. The kizzee mentor the elisabeth. If someone mentor the elisabeth then they are skewed. If someone swoosh the kizzee and they like the elisabeth then they see the elisabeth. If someone district the elisabeth then they like the kizzee. If the elisabeth is armed and the elisabeth mentor the kizzee then the elisabeth swoosh the kizzee. If someone is skewed then they chase the elisabeth. If someone swoosh the kizzee then the kizzee district the elisabeth. The elisabeth is skewed.", "logic": "\nDistrict(elisabeth, kizzee)\nSkewed(elisabeth)\nMentor(kizzee, elisabeth)\nforall x (Mentor(x, elisabeth) -> Skewed(x))\nforall x (Swoosh(x, kizzee) and Swoosh(x, elisabeth) -> Mentor(x, elisabeth))\nforall x (District(x, elisabeth) -> Swoosh(x, kizzee))\nArmed(elisabeth) and Mentor(elisabeth, kizzee) -> Swoosh(elisabeth, kizzee)\nforall x (Skewed(x) -> District(x, elisabeth))\nforall x (Swoosh(x, kizzee) -> District(kizzee, elisabeth))\n\nSkewed(elisabeth)\n\ntherefore Skewed(elisabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The marko snuff the roxine. The marko is peopled. The roxine retool the marko. If someone retool the marko then they are peopled. If someone extrude the roxine and they like the marko then they see the marko. If someone snuff the marko then they like the roxine. If the marko is motionless and the marko retool the roxine then the marko extrude the roxine. If someone is peopled then they chase the marko. If someone extrude the roxine then the roxine snuff the marko. The roxine does not see the marko.", "logic": "\nSnuff(marko, roxine)\nPeopled(marko)\nRetool(roxine, marko)\nforall x (Retool(x, marko) -> Peopled(x))\nforall x (Extrude(x, roxine) and Extrude(x, marko) -> Retool(x, marko))\nforall x (Snuff(x, marko) -> Extrude(x, roxine))\nMotionless(marko) and Retool(marko, roxine) -> Extrude(marko, roxine)\nforall x (Peopled(x) -> Snuff(x, marko))\nforall x (Extrude(x, roxine) -> Snuff(roxine, marko))\n\nnot Retool(roxine, marko)\n\ntherefore Retool(roxine, marko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The catie evaporate the parwane. The catie is undulate. The parwane balloon the catie. If someone balloon the catie then they are undulate. If someone binge the parwane and they like the catie then they see the catie. If someone evaporate the catie then they like the parwane. If the catie is acritical and the catie balloon the parwane then the catie binge the parwane. If someone is undulate then they chase the catie. If someone binge the parwane then the parwane evaporate the catie. The parwane is undulate.", "logic": "\nEvaporate(catie, parwane)\nUndulate(catie)\nBalloon(parwane, catie)\nforall x (Balloon(x, catie) -> Undulate(x))\nforall x (Binge(x, parwane) and Binge(x, catie) -> Balloon(x, catie))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, catie) -> Binge(x, parwane))\nAcritical(catie) and Balloon(catie, parwane) -> Binge(catie, parwane)\nforall x (Undulate(x) -> Evaporate(x, catie))\nforall x (Binge(x, parwane) -> Evaporate(parwane, catie))\n\nUndulate(parwane)\n\nBalloon(parwane, catie) and forall x (Balloon(x, catie) -> Undulate(x)) -> therefore Undulate(parwane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The tabbitha backstitch the johnna. The tabbitha is drifting. The johnna overweary the tabbitha. If someone overweary the tabbitha then they are drifting. If someone clip the johnna and they like the tabbitha then they see the tabbitha. If someone backstitch the tabbitha then they like the johnna. If the tabbitha is cusped and the tabbitha overweary the johnna then the tabbitha clip the johnna. If someone is drifting then they chase the tabbitha. If someone clip the johnna then the johnna backstitch the tabbitha. The johnna is not drifting.", "logic": "\nBackstitch(tabbitha, johnna)\nDrifting(tabbitha)\nOverweary(johnna, tabbitha)\nforall x (Overweary(x, tabbitha) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Clip(x, johnna) and Clip(x, tabbitha) -> Overweary(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Backstitch(x, tabbitha) -> Clip(x, johnna))\nCusped(tabbitha) and Overweary(tabbitha, johnna) -> Clip(tabbitha, johnna)\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> Backstitch(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Clip(x, johnna) -> Backstitch(johnna, tabbitha))\n\nnot Drifting(johnna)\n\nOverweary(johnna, tabbitha) and forall x (Overweary(x, tabbitha) -> Drifting(x)) -> therefore Drifting(johnna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The niles serialize the alaa. The niles is mucinous. The alaa prompt the niles. If someone prompt the niles then they are mucinous. If someone divine the alaa and they like the niles then they see the niles. If someone serialize the niles then they like the alaa. If the niles is undesigned and the niles prompt the alaa then the niles divine the alaa. If someone is mucinous then they chase the niles. If someone divine the alaa then the alaa serialize the niles. The niles divine the alaa.", "logic": "\nSerialize(niles, alaa)\nMucinous(niles)\nPrompt(alaa, niles)\nforall x (Prompt(x, niles) -> Mucinous(x))\nforall x (Divine(x, alaa) and Divine(x, niles) -> Prompt(x, niles))\nforall x (Serialize(x, niles) -> Divine(x, alaa))\nUndesigned(niles) and Prompt(niles, alaa) -> Divine(niles, alaa)\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Serialize(x, niles))\nforall x (Divine(x, alaa) -> Serialize(alaa, niles))\n\nDivine(niles, alaa)\n\nMucinous(niles) and forall x (Mucinous(x) -> Serialize(x, niles)) -> therefore Serialize(niles, niles) Serialize(niles, niles) and forall x (Serialize(x, niles) -> Divine(x, alaa)) -> therefore Divine(niles, alaa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The alleen amalgamate the josefina. The alleen is diploid. The josefina instil the alleen. If someone instil the alleen then they are diploid. If someone palpate the josefina and they like the alleen then they see the alleen. If someone amalgamate the alleen then they like the josefina. If the alleen is hooved and the alleen instil the josefina then the alleen palpate the josefina. If someone is diploid then they chase the alleen. If someone palpate the josefina then the josefina amalgamate the alleen. The alleen does not like the josefina.", "logic": "\nAmalgamate(alleen, josefina)\nDiploid(alleen)\nInstil(josefina, alleen)\nforall x (Instil(x, alleen) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Palpate(x, josefina) and Palpate(x, alleen) -> Instil(x, alleen))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x, alleen) -> Palpate(x, josefina))\nHooved(alleen) and Instil(alleen, josefina) -> Palpate(alleen, josefina)\nforall x (Diploid(x) -> Amalgamate(x, alleen))\nforall x (Palpate(x, josefina) -> Amalgamate(josefina, alleen))\n\nnot Palpate(alleen, josefina)\n\nDiploid(alleen) and forall x (Diploid(x) -> Amalgamate(x, alleen)) -> therefore Amalgamate(alleen, alleen) Amalgamate(alleen, alleen) and forall x (Amalgamate(x, alleen) -> Palpate(x, josefina)) -> therefore Palpate(alleen, josefina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The konstance foxtrot the jeannette. The konstance is deliberate. The jeannette abduct the konstance. If someone abduct the konstance then they are deliberate. If someone refracture the jeannette and they like the konstance then they see the konstance. If someone foxtrot the konstance then they like the jeannette. If the konstance is priceless and the konstance abduct the jeannette then the konstance refracture the jeannette. If someone is deliberate then they chase the konstance. If someone refracture the jeannette then the jeannette foxtrot the konstance. The jeannette refracture the jeannette.", "logic": "\nFoxtrot(konstance, jeannette)\nDeliberate(konstance)\nAbduct(jeannette, konstance)\nforall x (Abduct(x, konstance) -> Deliberate(x))\nforall x (Refracture(x, jeannette) and Refracture(x, konstance) -> Abduct(x, konstance))\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, konstance) -> Refracture(x, jeannette))\nPriceless(konstance) and Abduct(konstance, jeannette) -> Refracture(konstance, jeannette)\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Foxtrot(x, konstance))\nforall x (Refracture(x, jeannette) -> Foxtrot(jeannette, konstance))\n\nRefracture(jeannette, jeannette)\n\nAbduct(jeannette, konstance) and forall x (Abduct(x, konstance) -> Deliberate(x)) -> therefore Deliberate(jeannette) Deliberate(jeannette) and forall x (Deliberate(x) -> Foxtrot(x, konstance)) -> therefore Foxtrot(jeannette, konstance) Foxtrot(jeannette, konstance) and forall x (Foxtrot(x, konstance) -> Refracture(x, jeannette)) -> therefore Refracture(jeannette, jeannette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The vladimir satellite the serene. The vladimir is profane. The serene thrash the vladimir. If someone thrash the vladimir then they are profane. If someone trench the serene and they like the vladimir then they see the vladimir. If someone satellite the vladimir then they like the serene. If the vladimir is counter and the vladimir thrash the serene then the vladimir trench the serene. If someone is profane then they chase the vladimir. If someone trench the serene then the serene satellite the vladimir. The serene does not like the serene.", "logic": "\nSatellite(vladimir, serene)\nProfane(vladimir)\nThrash(serene, vladimir)\nforall x (Thrash(x, vladimir) -> Profane(x))\nforall x (Trench(x, serene) and Trench(x, vladimir) -> Thrash(x, vladimir))\nforall x (Satellite(x, vladimir) -> Trench(x, serene))\nCounter(vladimir) and Thrash(vladimir, serene) -> Trench(vladimir, serene)\nforall x (Profane(x) -> Satellite(x, vladimir))\nforall x (Trench(x, serene) -> Satellite(serene, vladimir))\n\nnot Trench(serene, serene)\n\nThrash(serene, vladimir) and forall x (Thrash(x, vladimir) -> Profane(x)) -> therefore Profane(serene) Profane(serene) and forall x (Profane(x) -> Satellite(x, vladimir)) -> therefore Satellite(serene, vladimir) Satellite(serene, vladimir) and forall x (Satellite(x, vladimir) -> Trench(x, serene)) -> therefore Trench(serene, serene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The cathlene mobilize the bettine. The cathlene is crested. The bettine bedaub the cathlene. If someone bedaub the cathlene then they are crested. If someone fellate the bettine and they like the cathlene then they see the cathlene. If someone mobilize the cathlene then they like the bettine. If the cathlene is cheeky and the cathlene bedaub the bettine then the cathlene fellate the bettine. If someone is crested then they chase the cathlene. If someone fellate the bettine then the bettine mobilize the cathlene. The cathlene does not see the cathlene.", "logic": "\nMobilize(cathlene, bettine)\nCrested(cathlene)\nBedaub(bettine, cathlene)\nforall x (Bedaub(x, cathlene) -> Crested(x))\nforall x (Fellate(x, bettine) and Fellate(x, cathlene) -> Bedaub(x, cathlene))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, cathlene) -> Fellate(x, bettine))\nCheeky(cathlene) and Bedaub(cathlene, bettine) -> Fellate(cathlene, bettine)\nforall x (Crested(x) -> Mobilize(x, cathlene))\nforall x (Fellate(x, bettine) -> Mobilize(bettine, cathlene))\n\nnot Bedaub(cathlene, cathlene)\n\nforall x (Fellate(x, bettine) and Fellate(x, cathlene) -> Bedaub(x, cathlene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The bidget unbelt the easter. The bidget is germanic. The easter winterise the bidget. If someone winterise the bidget then they are germanic. If someone tiptoe the easter and they like the bidget then they see the bidget. If someone unbelt the bidget then they like the easter. If the bidget is frank and the bidget winterise the easter then the bidget tiptoe the easter. If someone is germanic then they chase the bidget. If someone tiptoe the easter then the easter unbelt the bidget. The easter is frank.", "logic": "\nUnbelt(bidget, easter)\nGermanic(bidget)\nWinterise(easter, bidget)\nforall x (Winterise(x, bidget) -> Germanic(x))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x, easter) and Tiptoe(x, bidget) -> Winterise(x, bidget))\nforall x (Unbelt(x, bidget) -> Tiptoe(x, easter))\nFrank(bidget) and Winterise(bidget, easter) -> Tiptoe(bidget, easter)\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Unbelt(x, bidget))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x, easter) -> Unbelt(easter, bidget))\n\nFrank(easter)\n\nFrank(easter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The neville fault the celestine. The neville is scurfy. The celestine isolate the neville. If someone isolate the neville then they are scurfy. If someone encrimson the celestine and they like the neville then they see the neville. If someone fault the neville then they like the celestine. If the neville is orbital and the neville isolate the celestine then the neville encrimson the celestine. If someone is scurfy then they chase the neville. If someone encrimson the celestine then the celestine fault the neville. The celestine is not round.", "logic": "\nFault(neville, celestine)\nScurfy(neville)\nIsolate(celestine, neville)\nforall x (Isolate(x, neville) -> Scurfy(x))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, celestine) and Encrimson(x, neville) -> Isolate(x, neville))\nforall x (Fault(x, neville) -> Encrimson(x, celestine))\nOrbital(neville) and Isolate(neville, celestine) -> Encrimson(neville, celestine)\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Fault(x, neville))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, celestine) -> Fault(celestine, neville))\n\nnot Round(celestine)\n\nnot Round(celestine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The fayth plagiarise the terrianne. The fayth is liverish. The terrianne clash the fayth. If someone clash the fayth then they are liverish. If someone declassify the terrianne and they like the fayth then they see the fayth. If someone plagiarise the fayth then they like the terrianne. If the fayth is anuran and the fayth clash the terrianne then the fayth declassify the terrianne. If someone is liverish then they chase the fayth. If someone declassify the terrianne then the terrianne plagiarise the fayth. The fayth is round.", "logic": "\nPlagiarise(fayth, terrianne)\nLiverish(fayth)\nClash(terrianne, fayth)\nforall x (Clash(x, fayth) -> Liverish(x))\nforall x (Declassify(x, terrianne) and Declassify(x, fayth) -> Clash(x, fayth))\nforall x (Plagiarise(x, fayth) -> Declassify(x, terrianne))\nAnuran(fayth) and Clash(fayth, terrianne) -> Declassify(fayth, terrianne)\nforall x (Liverish(x) -> Plagiarise(x, fayth))\nforall x (Declassify(x, terrianne) -> Plagiarise(terrianne, fayth))\n\nRound(fayth)\n\nRound(fayth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The stanford attemper the andree. The stanford is twelfth. The andree bolshevise the stanford. If someone bolshevise the stanford then they are twelfth. If someone humanise the andree and they like the stanford then they see the stanford. If someone attemper the stanford then they like the andree. If the stanford is baleful and the stanford bolshevise the andree then the stanford humanise the andree. If someone is twelfth then they chase the stanford. If someone humanise the andree then the andree attemper the stanford. The andree is not red.", "logic": "\nAttemper(stanford, andree)\nTwelfth(stanford)\nBolshevise(andree, stanford)\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, stanford) -> Twelfth(x))\nforall x (Humanise(x, andree) and Humanise(x, stanford) -> Bolshevise(x, stanford))\nforall x (Attemper(x, stanford) -> Humanise(x, andree))\nBaleful(stanford) and Bolshevise(stanford, andree) -> Humanise(stanford, andree)\nforall x (Twelfth(x) -> Attemper(x, stanford))\nforall x (Humanise(x, andree) -> Attemper(andree, stanford))\n\nnot Red(andree)\n\nnot Red(andree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The braden heckle the mollie. The braden is blackish. The mollie cloak the braden. If someone cloak the braden then they are blackish. If someone store the mollie and they like the braden then they see the braden. If someone heckle the braden then they like the mollie. If the braden is weepy and the braden cloak the mollie then the braden store the mollie. If someone is blackish then they chase the braden. If someone store the mollie then the mollie heckle the braden. The braden is nice.", "logic": "\nHeckle(braden, mollie)\nBlackish(braden)\nCloak(mollie, braden)\nforall x (Cloak(x, braden) -> Blackish(x))\nforall x (Store(x, mollie) and Store(x, braden) -> Cloak(x, braden))\nforall x (Heckle(x, braden) -> Store(x, mollie))\nWeepy(braden) and Cloak(braden, mollie) -> Store(braden, mollie)\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Heckle(x, braden))\nforall x (Store(x, mollie) -> Heckle(mollie, braden))\n\nNice(braden)\n\nNice(braden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The kaylyn introduce the dorrie. The kaylyn is hegelian. The dorrie qualify the kaylyn. If someone qualify the kaylyn then they are hegelian. If someone ascertain the dorrie and they like the kaylyn then they see the kaylyn. If someone introduce the kaylyn then they like the dorrie. If the kaylyn is sarawakian and the kaylyn qualify the dorrie then the kaylyn ascertain the dorrie. If someone is hegelian then they chase the kaylyn. If someone ascertain the dorrie then the dorrie introduce the kaylyn. The dorrie does not like the kaylyn.", "logic": "\nIntroduce(kaylyn, dorrie)\nHegelian(kaylyn)\nQualify(dorrie, kaylyn)\nforall x (Qualify(x, kaylyn) -> Hegelian(x))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, dorrie) and Ascertain(x, kaylyn) -> Qualify(x, kaylyn))\nforall x (Introduce(x, kaylyn) -> Ascertain(x, dorrie))\nSarawakian(kaylyn) and Qualify(kaylyn, dorrie) -> Ascertain(kaylyn, dorrie)\nforall x (Hegelian(x) -> Introduce(x, kaylyn))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, dorrie) -> Introduce(dorrie, kaylyn))\n\nnot Ascertain(dorrie, kaylyn)\n\nnot Ascertain(dorrie, kaylyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The zorah heave the tiebout. The zorah is choragic. The tiebout validate the zorah. If someone validate the zorah then they are choragic. If someone quiver the tiebout and they like the zorah then they see the zorah. If someone heave the zorah then they like the tiebout. If the zorah is arching and the zorah validate the tiebout then the zorah quiver the tiebout. If someone is choragic then they chase the zorah. If someone quiver the tiebout then the tiebout heave the zorah. The zorah validate the tiebout.", "logic": "\nHeave(zorah, tiebout)\nChoragic(zorah)\nValidate(tiebout, zorah)\nforall x (Validate(x, zorah) -> Choragic(x))\nforall x (Quiver(x, tiebout) and Quiver(x, zorah) -> Validate(x, zorah))\nforall x (Heave(x, zorah) -> Quiver(x, tiebout))\nArching(zorah) and Validate(zorah, tiebout) -> Quiver(zorah, tiebout)\nforall x (Choragic(x) -> Heave(x, zorah))\nforall x (Quiver(x, tiebout) -> Heave(tiebout, zorah))\n\nValidate(zorah, tiebout)\n\nValidate(zorah, tiebout) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "Lily is saturnine. All unpitying people are toothless. If Lily is saturnine then Lily is regimented. If someone is regimented then they are unpitying. Round people are toothless. All ardent, regimented people are unpitying. Blue, unpitying people are regimented. Lily is saturnine.", "logic": "\nSaturnine(lily)\nforall x (Unpitying(x) -> Toothless(x))\nSaturnine(lily) -> Regimented(lily)\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Unpitying(x))\nforall x (Serial(x) -> Toothless(x))\nforall x (Ardent(x) and Regimented(x) -> Unpitying(x))\nforall x (Toothless(x) and Unpitying(x) -> Regimented(x))\n\nSaturnine(lily)\n\ntherefore Saturnine(lily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Rosene is boxlike. All continent people are fifteenth. If Rosene is boxlike then Rosene is batholitic. If someone is batholitic then they are continent. Round people are fifteenth. All inland, batholitic people are continent. Blue, continent people are batholitic. Rosene is not boxlike.", "logic": "\nBoxlike(rosene)\nforall x (Continent(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\nBoxlike(rosene) -> Batholitic(rosene)\nforall x (Batholitic(x) -> Continent(x))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) and Batholitic(x) -> Continent(x))\nforall x (Fifteenth(x) and Continent(x) -> Batholitic(x))\n\nnot Boxlike(rosene)\n\ntherefore Boxlike(rosene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Kalvin is argive. All soporific people are deluxe. If Kalvin is argive then Kalvin is animistic. If someone is animistic then they are soporific. Round people are deluxe. All dwindling, animistic people are soporific. Blue, soporific people are animistic. Kalvin is animistic.", "logic": "\nArgive(kalvin)\nforall x (Soporific(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nArgive(kalvin) -> Animistic(kalvin)\nforall x (Animistic(x) -> Soporific(x))\nforall x (According(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Animistic(x) -> Soporific(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) and Soporific(x) -> Animistic(x))\n\nAnimistic(kalvin)\n\nArgive(kalvin) and Argive(kalvin) -> Animistic(kalvin) -> therefore Animistic(kalvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Siffre is sybaritic. All uremic people are accessary. If Siffre is sybaritic then Siffre is marred. If someone is marred then they are uremic. Round people are accessary. All oxonian, marred people are uremic. Blue, uremic people are marred. Siffre is not marred.", "logic": "\nSybaritic(siffre)\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Accessary(x))\nSybaritic(siffre) -> Marred(siffre)\nforall x (Marred(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Unlit(x) -> Accessary(x))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) and Marred(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Accessary(x) and Uremic(x) -> Marred(x))\n\nnot Marred(siffre)\n\nSybaritic(siffre) and Sybaritic(siffre) -> Marred(siffre) -> therefore Marred(siffre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Rozanne is wobbly. All upended people are bilateral. If Rozanne is wobbly then Rozanne is oversexed. If someone is oversexed then they are upended. Round people are bilateral. All ametabolic, oversexed people are upended. Blue, upended people are oversexed. Rozanne is upended.", "logic": "\nWobbly(rozanne)\nforall x (Upended(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nWobbly(rozanne) -> Oversexed(rozanne)\nforall x (Oversexed(x) -> Upended(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) and Oversexed(x) -> Upended(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) and Upended(x) -> Oversexed(x))\n\nUpended(rozanne)\n\nWobbly(rozanne) and Wobbly(rozanne) -> Oversexed(rozanne) -> therefore Oversexed(rozanne) Oversexed(rozanne) and forall x (Oversexed(x) -> Upended(x)) -> therefore Upended(rozanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Casandra is diligent. All airborne people are correct. If Casandra is diligent then Casandra is scurvy. If someone is scurvy then they are airborne. Round people are correct. All shapely, scurvy people are airborne. Blue, airborne people are scurvy. Casandra is not airborne.", "logic": "\nDiligent(casandra)\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> Correct(x))\nDiligent(casandra) -> Scurvy(casandra)\nforall x (Scurvy(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Mendicant(x) -> Correct(x))\nforall x (Shapely(x) and Scurvy(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Correct(x) and Airborne(x) -> Scurvy(x))\n\nnot Airborne(casandra)\n\nDiligent(casandra) and Diligent(casandra) -> Scurvy(casandra) -> therefore Scurvy(casandra) Scurvy(casandra) and forall x (Scurvy(x) -> Airborne(x)) -> therefore Airborne(casandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Tildie is ecologic. All outcaste people are bottom. If Tildie is ecologic then Tildie is wondrous. If someone is wondrous then they are outcaste. Round people are bottom. All sage, wondrous people are outcaste. Blue, outcaste people are wondrous. Tildie is bottom.", "logic": "\nEcologic(tildie)\nforall x (Outcaste(x) -> Bottom(x))\nEcologic(tildie) -> Wondrous(tildie)\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Outcaste(x))\nforall x (Running(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Sage(x) and Wondrous(x) -> Outcaste(x))\nforall x (Bottom(x) and Outcaste(x) -> Wondrous(x))\n\nBottom(tildie)\n\nEcologic(tildie) and Ecologic(tildie) -> Wondrous(tildie) -> therefore Wondrous(tildie) Wondrous(tildie) and forall x (Wondrous(x) -> Outcaste(x)) -> therefore Outcaste(tildie) Outcaste(tildie) and forall x (Outcaste(x) -> Bottom(x)) -> therefore Bottom(tildie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Ivy is arborical. All slurred people are seamless. If Ivy is arborical then Ivy is listed. If someone is listed then they are slurred. Round people are seamless. All undefeated, listed people are slurred. Blue, slurred people are listed. Ivy is not seamless.", "logic": "\nArborical(ivy)\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Seamless(x))\nArborical(ivy) -> Listed(ivy)\nforall x (Listed(x) -> Slurred(x))\nforall x (Forceless(x) -> Seamless(x))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and Listed(x) -> Slurred(x))\nforall x (Seamless(x) and Slurred(x) -> Listed(x))\n\nnot Seamless(ivy)\n\nArborical(ivy) and Arborical(ivy) -> Listed(ivy) -> therefore Listed(ivy) Listed(ivy) and forall x (Listed(x) -> Slurred(x)) -> therefore Slurred(ivy) Slurred(ivy) and forall x (Slurred(x) -> Seamless(x)) -> therefore Seamless(ivy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Redford is earthbound. All undreamed people are pyramidic. If Redford is earthbound then Redford is carthusian. If someone is carthusian then they are undreamed. Round people are pyramidic. All prosthetic, carthusian people are undreamed. Blue, undreamed people are carthusian. Redford is not handwoven.", "logic": "\nEarthbound(redford)\nforall x (Undreamed(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nEarthbound(redford) -> Carthusian(redford)\nforall x (Carthusian(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Handwoven(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nforall x (Prosthetic(x) and Carthusian(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) and Undreamed(x) -> Carthusian(x))\n\nnot Handwoven(redford)\n\nnot Handwoven(redford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Concordia is recurved. All waiting people are pristine. If Concordia is recurved then Concordia is gallican. If someone is gallican then they are waiting. Round people are pristine. All alternate, gallican people are waiting. Blue, waiting people are gallican. Concordia is nice.", "logic": "\nRecurved(concordia)\nforall x (Waiting(x) -> Pristine(x))\nRecurved(concordia) -> Gallican(concordia)\nforall x (Gallican(x) -> Waiting(x))\nforall x (Sectioned(x) -> Pristine(x))\nforall x (Alternate(x) and Gallican(x) -> Waiting(x))\nforall x (Pristine(x) and Waiting(x) -> Gallican(x))\n\nNice(concordia)\n\nNice(concordia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "The jessalyn is unaffected. The elie daze the ric. The elie is unaffected. The elie is acinar. The silva does not visit the ric. The ric divert the silva. The ric is unaffected. If someone daze the jessalyn then the jessalyn apologize the ric. If someone is unaffected and they do not eat the silva then the silva apologize the jessalyn. If someone divert the silva and the silva is unseeded then the silva does not visit the jessalyn. If someone daze the ric and they chase the silva then they are not slanderous. If the silva does not eat the elie then the silva divert the elie. If someone is slanderous then they visit the silva. If the ric is unaffected then the ric daze the jessalyn. If someone apologize the ric then the ric is not slanderous. The silva does not visit the ric.", "logic": "\nUnaffected(jessalyn)\nDaze(elie, ric)\nUnaffected(elie)\nAcinar(elie)\nnot Apologize(silva, ric)\nDivert(ric, silva)\nUnaffected(ric)\nforall x (Daze(x, jessalyn) -> Apologize(jessalyn, ric))\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and not Daze(x, silva) -> Apologize(silva, jessalyn))\nforall x (Divert(x, silva) and Unseeded(silva) -> not Apologize(silva, jessalyn))\nforall x (Daze(x, ric) and Divert(x, silva) -> not Slanderous(x))\nnot Daze(silva, elie) -> Divert(silva, elie)\nforall x (Slanderous(x) -> Apologize(x, silva))\nUnaffected(ric) -> Daze(ric, jessalyn)\nforall x (Apologize(x, ric) -> not Slanderous(ric))\n\nnot Apologize(silva, ric)\n\ntherefore not Apologize(silva, ric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The eleanora is phalangeal. The myrtia intoxicate the doroteya. The myrtia is phalangeal. The myrtia is somnific. The alden does not visit the doroteya. The doroteya shrimp the alden. The doroteya is phalangeal. If someone intoxicate the eleanora then the eleanora decussate the doroteya. If someone is phalangeal and they do not eat the alden then the alden decussate the eleanora. If someone shrimp the alden and the alden is hidden then the alden does not visit the eleanora. If someone intoxicate the doroteya and they chase the alden then they are not drab. If the alden does not eat the myrtia then the alden shrimp the myrtia. If someone is drab then they visit the alden. If the doroteya is phalangeal then the doroteya intoxicate the eleanora. If someone decussate the doroteya then the doroteya is not drab. The eleanora is not phalangeal.", "logic": "\nPhalangeal(eleanora)\nIntoxicate(myrtia, doroteya)\nPhalangeal(myrtia)\nSomnific(myrtia)\nnot Decussate(alden, doroteya)\nShrimp(doroteya, alden)\nPhalangeal(doroteya)\nforall x (Intoxicate(x, eleanora) -> Decussate(eleanora, doroteya))\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) and not Intoxicate(x, alden) -> Decussate(alden, eleanora))\nforall x (Shrimp(x, alden) and Hidden(alden) -> not Decussate(alden, eleanora))\nforall x (Intoxicate(x, doroteya) and Shrimp(x, alden) -> not Drab(x))\nnot Intoxicate(alden, myrtia) -> Shrimp(alden, myrtia)\nforall x (Drab(x) -> Decussate(x, alden))\nPhalangeal(doroteya) -> Intoxicate(doroteya, eleanora)\nforall x (Decussate(x, doroteya) -> not Drab(doroteya))\n\nnot Phalangeal(eleanora)\n\ntherefore Phalangeal(eleanora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The lia is unsoured. The kizzie alkalinize the kristi. The kizzie is unsoured. The kizzie is oleaceous. The hettie does not visit the kristi. The kristi mangle the hettie. The kristi is unsoured. If someone alkalinize the lia then the lia congee the kristi. If someone is unsoured and they do not eat the hettie then the hettie congee the lia. If someone mangle the hettie and the hettie is roasted then the hettie does not visit the lia. If someone alkalinize the kristi and they chase the hettie then they are not reactive. If the hettie does not eat the kizzie then the hettie mangle the kizzie. If someone is reactive then they visit the hettie. If the kristi is unsoured then the kristi alkalinize the lia. If someone congee the kristi then the kristi is not reactive. The kristi alkalinize the lia.", "logic": "\nUnsoured(lia)\nAlkalinize(kizzie, kristi)\nUnsoured(kizzie)\nOleaceous(kizzie)\nnot Congee(hettie, kristi)\nMangle(kristi, hettie)\nUnsoured(kristi)\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, lia) -> Congee(lia, kristi))\nforall x (Unsoured(x) and not Alkalinize(x, hettie) -> Congee(hettie, lia))\nforall x (Mangle(x, hettie) and Roasted(hettie) -> not Congee(hettie, lia))\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, kristi) and Mangle(x, hettie) -> not Reactive(x))\nnot Alkalinize(hettie, kizzie) -> Mangle(hettie, kizzie)\nforall x (Reactive(x) -> Congee(x, hettie))\nUnsoured(kristi) -> Alkalinize(kristi, lia)\nforall x (Congee(x, kristi) -> not Reactive(kristi))\n\nAlkalinize(kristi, lia)\n\nUnsoured(kristi) and Unsoured(kristi) -> Alkalinize(kristi, lia) -> therefore Alkalinize(kristi, lia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The carolina is cuticular. The mallissa understand the jewel. The mallissa is cuticular. The mallissa is craggy. The jeffrey does not visit the jewel. The jewel traffic the jeffrey. The jewel is cuticular. If someone understand the carolina then the carolina wangle the jewel. If someone is cuticular and they do not eat the jeffrey then the jeffrey wangle the carolina. If someone traffic the jeffrey and the jeffrey is perilous then the jeffrey does not visit the carolina. If someone understand the jewel and they chase the jeffrey then they are not ugly. If the jeffrey does not eat the mallissa then the jeffrey traffic the mallissa. If someone is ugly then they visit the jeffrey. If the jewel is cuticular then the jewel understand the carolina. If someone wangle the jewel then the jewel is not ugly. The jewel does not eat the carolina.", "logic": "\nCuticular(carolina)\nUnderstand(mallissa, jewel)\nCuticular(mallissa)\nCraggy(mallissa)\nnot Wangle(jeffrey, jewel)\nTraffic(jewel, jeffrey)\nCuticular(jewel)\nforall x (Understand(x, carolina) -> Wangle(carolina, jewel))\nforall x (Cuticular(x) and not Understand(x, jeffrey) -> Wangle(jeffrey, carolina))\nforall x (Traffic(x, jeffrey) and Perilous(jeffrey) -> not Wangle(jeffrey, carolina))\nforall x (Understand(x, jewel) and Traffic(x, jeffrey) -> not Ugly(x))\nnot Understand(jeffrey, mallissa) -> Traffic(jeffrey, mallissa)\nforall x (Ugly(x) -> Wangle(x, jeffrey))\nCuticular(jewel) -> Understand(jewel, carolina)\nforall x (Wangle(x, jewel) -> not Ugly(jewel))\n\nnot Understand(jewel, carolina)\n\nCuticular(jewel) and Cuticular(jewel) -> Understand(jewel, carolina) -> therefore Understand(jewel, carolina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The amy is lapidarian. The stern misdemean the oralla. The stern is lapidarian. The stern is mesophytic. The mari does not visit the oralla. The oralla sleigh the mari. The oralla is lapidarian. If someone misdemean the amy then the amy revamp the oralla. If someone is lapidarian and they do not eat the mari then the mari revamp the amy. If someone sleigh the mari and the mari is unranked then the mari does not visit the amy. If someone misdemean the oralla and they chase the mari then they are not plucked. If the mari does not eat the stern then the mari sleigh the stern. If someone is plucked then they visit the mari. If the oralla is lapidarian then the oralla misdemean the amy. If someone revamp the oralla then the oralla is not plucked. The amy revamp the oralla.", "logic": "\nLapidarian(amy)\nMisdemean(stern, oralla)\nLapidarian(stern)\nMesophytic(stern)\nnot Revamp(mari, oralla)\nSleigh(oralla, mari)\nLapidarian(oralla)\nforall x (Misdemean(x, amy) -> Revamp(amy, oralla))\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) and not Misdemean(x, mari) -> Revamp(mari, amy))\nforall x (Sleigh(x, mari) and Unranked(mari) -> not Revamp(mari, amy))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, oralla) and Sleigh(x, mari) -> not Plucked(x))\nnot Misdemean(mari, stern) -> Sleigh(mari, stern)\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Revamp(x, mari))\nLapidarian(oralla) -> Misdemean(oralla, amy)\nforall x (Revamp(x, oralla) -> not Plucked(oralla))\n\nRevamp(amy, oralla)\n\nLapidarian(oralla) and Lapidarian(oralla) -> Misdemean(oralla, amy) -> therefore Misdemean(oralla, amy) Misdemean(oralla, amy) and forall x (Misdemean(x, amy) -> Revamp(amy, oralla)) -> therefore Revamp(amy, oralla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The stafford is blamed. The nanni abseil the wynton. The nanni is blamed. The nanni is chapped. The ellyn does not visit the wynton. The wynton defog the ellyn. The wynton is blamed. If someone abseil the stafford then the stafford alcoholize the wynton. If someone is blamed and they do not eat the ellyn then the ellyn alcoholize the stafford. If someone defog the ellyn and the ellyn is populous then the ellyn does not visit the stafford. If someone abseil the wynton and they chase the ellyn then they are not rococo. If the ellyn does not eat the nanni then the ellyn defog the nanni. If someone is rococo then they visit the ellyn. If the wynton is blamed then the wynton abseil the stafford. If someone alcoholize the wynton then the wynton is not rococo. The stafford does not visit the wynton.", "logic": "\nBlamed(stafford)\nAbseil(nanni, wynton)\nBlamed(nanni)\nChapped(nanni)\nnot Alcoholize(ellyn, wynton)\nDefog(wynton, ellyn)\nBlamed(wynton)\nforall x (Abseil(x, stafford) -> Alcoholize(stafford, wynton))\nforall x (Blamed(x) and not Abseil(x, ellyn) -> Alcoholize(ellyn, stafford))\nforall x (Defog(x, ellyn) and Populous(ellyn) -> not Alcoholize(ellyn, stafford))\nforall x (Abseil(x, wynton) and Defog(x, ellyn) -> not Rococo(x))\nnot Abseil(ellyn, nanni) -> Defog(ellyn, nanni)\nforall x (Rococo(x) -> Alcoholize(x, ellyn))\nBlamed(wynton) -> Abseil(wynton, stafford)\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, wynton) -> not Rococo(wynton))\n\nnot Alcoholize(stafford, wynton)\n\nBlamed(wynton) and Blamed(wynton) -> Abseil(wynton, stafford) -> therefore Abseil(wynton, stafford) Abseil(wynton, stafford) and forall x (Abseil(x, stafford) -> Alcoholize(stafford, wynton)) -> therefore Alcoholize(stafford, wynton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The kimmy is iridic. The imelda slum the vanni. The imelda is iridic. The imelda is doped. The janella does not visit the vanni. The vanni orient the janella. The vanni is iridic. If someone slum the kimmy then the kimmy wriggle the vanni. If someone is iridic and they do not eat the janella then the janella wriggle the kimmy. If someone orient the janella and the janella is saintlike then the janella does not visit the kimmy. If someone slum the vanni and they chase the janella then they are not carinated. If the janella does not eat the imelda then the janella orient the imelda. If someone is carinated then they visit the janella. If the vanni is iridic then the vanni slum the kimmy. If someone wriggle the vanni then the vanni is not carinated. The vanni is not carinated.", "logic": "\nIridic(kimmy)\nSlum(imelda, vanni)\nIridic(imelda)\nDoped(imelda)\nnot Wriggle(janella, vanni)\nOrient(vanni, janella)\nIridic(vanni)\nforall x (Slum(x, kimmy) -> Wriggle(kimmy, vanni))\nforall x (Iridic(x) and not Slum(x, janella) -> Wriggle(janella, kimmy))\nforall x (Orient(x, janella) and Saintlike(janella) -> not Wriggle(janella, kimmy))\nforall x (Slum(x, vanni) and Orient(x, janella) -> not Carinated(x))\nnot Slum(janella, imelda) -> Orient(janella, imelda)\nforall x (Carinated(x) -> Wriggle(x, janella))\nIridic(vanni) -> Slum(vanni, kimmy)\nforall x (Wriggle(x, vanni) -> not Carinated(vanni))\n\nnot Carinated(vanni)\n\nIridic(vanni) and Iridic(vanni) -> Slum(vanni, kimmy) -> therefore Slum(vanni, kimmy) Slum(vanni, kimmy) and forall x (Slum(x, kimmy) -> Wriggle(kimmy, vanni)) -> therefore Wriggle(kimmy, vanni) Wriggle(kimmy, vanni) and forall x (Wriggle(x, vanni) -> not Carinated(vanni)) -> therefore not Carinated(vanni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The guendolen is eolithic. The heide shack the kara. The heide is eolithic. The heide is viatical. The briny does not visit the kara. The kara scull the briny. The kara is eolithic. If someone shack the guendolen then the guendolen cavil the kara. If someone is eolithic and they do not eat the briny then the briny cavil the guendolen. If someone scull the briny and the briny is veteran then the briny does not visit the guendolen. If someone shack the kara and they chase the briny then they are not enigmatic. If the briny does not eat the heide then the briny scull the heide. If someone is enigmatic then they visit the briny. If the kara is eolithic then the kara shack the guendolen. If someone cavil the kara then the kara is not enigmatic. The kara is enigmatic.", "logic": "\nEolithic(guendolen)\nShack(heide, kara)\nEolithic(heide)\nViatical(heide)\nnot Cavil(briny, kara)\nScull(kara, briny)\nEolithic(kara)\nforall x (Shack(x, guendolen) -> Cavil(guendolen, kara))\nforall x (Eolithic(x) and not Shack(x, briny) -> Cavil(briny, guendolen))\nforall x (Scull(x, briny) and Veteran(briny) -> not Cavil(briny, guendolen))\nforall x (Shack(x, kara) and Scull(x, briny) -> not Enigmatic(x))\nnot Shack(briny, heide) -> Scull(briny, heide)\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) -> Cavil(x, briny))\nEolithic(kara) -> Shack(kara, guendolen)\nforall x (Cavil(x, kara) -> not Enigmatic(kara))\n\nEnigmatic(kara)\n\nEolithic(kara) and Eolithic(kara) -> Shack(kara, guendolen) -> therefore Shack(kara, guendolen) Shack(kara, guendolen) and forall x (Shack(x, guendolen) -> Cavil(guendolen, kara)) -> therefore Cavil(guendolen, kara) Cavil(guendolen, kara) and forall x (Cavil(x, kara) -> not Enigmatic(kara)) -> therefore not Enigmatic(kara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The licha is nidifugous. The normie exile the lynnea. The normie is nidifugous. The normie is remaining. The ramonda does not visit the lynnea. The lynnea whap the ramonda. The lynnea is nidifugous. If someone exile the licha then the licha integrate the lynnea. If someone is nidifugous and they do not eat the ramonda then the ramonda integrate the licha. If someone whap the ramonda and the ramonda is nutritive then the ramonda does not visit the licha. If someone exile the lynnea and they chase the ramonda then they are not percipient. If the ramonda does not eat the normie then the ramonda whap the normie. If someone is percipient then they visit the ramonda. If the lynnea is nidifugous then the lynnea exile the licha. If someone integrate the lynnea then the lynnea is not percipient. The ramonda does not visit the ramonda.", "logic": "\nNidifugous(licha)\nExile(normie, lynnea)\nNidifugous(normie)\nRemaining(normie)\nnot Integrate(ramonda, lynnea)\nWhap(lynnea, ramonda)\nNidifugous(lynnea)\nforall x (Exile(x, licha) -> Integrate(licha, lynnea))\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) and not Exile(x, ramonda) -> Integrate(ramonda, licha))\nforall x (Whap(x, ramonda) and Nutritive(ramonda) -> not Integrate(ramonda, licha))\nforall x (Exile(x, lynnea) and Whap(x, ramonda) -> not Percipient(x))\nnot Exile(ramonda, normie) -> Whap(ramonda, normie)\nforall x (Percipient(x) -> Integrate(x, ramonda))\nNidifugous(lynnea) -> Exile(lynnea, licha)\nforall x (Integrate(x, lynnea) -> not Percipient(lynnea))\n\nnot Integrate(ramonda, ramonda)\n\nforall x (Percipient(x) -> Integrate(x, ramonda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The gwen is agonadal. The gert assert the gabriela. The gert is agonadal. The gert is elliptic. The hirsch does not visit the gabriela. The gabriela plagiarize the hirsch. The gabriela is agonadal. If someone assert the gwen then the gwen whir the gabriela. If someone is agonadal and they do not eat the hirsch then the hirsch whir the gwen. If someone plagiarize the hirsch and the hirsch is healthful then the hirsch does not visit the gwen. If someone assert the gabriela and they chase the hirsch then they are not flippant. If the hirsch does not eat the gert then the hirsch plagiarize the gert. If someone is flippant then they visit the hirsch. If the gabriela is agonadal then the gabriela assert the gwen. If someone whir the gabriela then the gabriela is not flippant. The hirsch plagiarize the gert.", "logic": "\nAgonadal(gwen)\nAssert(gert, gabriela)\nAgonadal(gert)\nElliptic(gert)\nnot Whir(hirsch, gabriela)\nPlagiarize(gabriela, hirsch)\nAgonadal(gabriela)\nforall x (Assert(x, gwen) -> Whir(gwen, gabriela))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and not Assert(x, hirsch) -> Whir(hirsch, gwen))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, hirsch) and Healthful(hirsch) -> not Whir(hirsch, gwen))\nforall x (Assert(x, gabriela) and Plagiarize(x, hirsch) -> not Flippant(x))\nnot Assert(hirsch, gert) -> Plagiarize(hirsch, gert)\nforall x (Flippant(x) -> Whir(x, hirsch))\nAgonadal(gabriela) -> Assert(gabriela, gwen)\nforall x (Whir(x, gabriela) -> not Flippant(gabriela))\n\nPlagiarize(hirsch, gert)\n\nnot Assert(hirsch, gert) -> Plagiarize(hirsch, gert) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The scotti is ramate. The purcell retire the quigman. The purcell is ramate. The purcell is grey. The nana does not visit the quigman. The quigman grimace the nana. The quigman is ramate. If someone retire the scotti then the scotti renew the quigman. If someone is ramate and they do not eat the nana then the nana renew the scotti. If someone grimace the nana and the nana is multiplex then the nana does not visit the scotti. If someone retire the quigman and they chase the nana then they are not languorous. If the nana does not eat the purcell then the nana grimace the purcell. If someone is languorous then they visit the nana. If the quigman is ramate then the quigman retire the scotti. If someone renew the quigman then the quigman is not languorous. The scotti does not visit the nana.", "logic": "\nRamate(scotti)\nRetire(purcell, quigman)\nRamate(purcell)\nGrey(purcell)\nnot Renew(nana, quigman)\nGrimace(quigman, nana)\nRamate(quigman)\nforall x (Retire(x, scotti) -> Renew(scotti, quigman))\nforall x (Ramate(x) and not Retire(x, nana) -> Renew(nana, scotti))\nforall x (Grimace(x, nana) and Multiplex(nana) -> not Renew(nana, scotti))\nforall x (Retire(x, quigman) and Grimace(x, nana) -> not Languorous(x))\nnot Retire(nana, purcell) -> Grimace(nana, purcell)\nforall x (Languorous(x) -> Renew(x, nana))\nRamate(quigman) -> Retire(quigman, scotti)\nforall x (Renew(x, quigman) -> not Languorous(quigman))\n\nnot Renew(scotti, nana)\n\nforall x (Languorous(x) -> Renew(x, nana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The melitta is nonpublic. The marjorie shed the dunstan. The marjorie is nonpublic. The marjorie is glittering. The filide does not visit the dunstan. The dunstan please the filide. The dunstan is nonpublic. If someone shed the melitta then the melitta nasalise the dunstan. If someone is nonpublic and they do not eat the filide then the filide nasalise the melitta. If someone please the filide and the filide is hugoesque then the filide does not visit the melitta. If someone shed the dunstan and they chase the filide then they are not abridged. If the filide does not eat the marjorie then the filide please the marjorie. If someone is abridged then they visit the filide. If the dunstan is nonpublic then the dunstan shed the melitta. If someone nasalise the dunstan then the dunstan is not abridged. The dunstan nasalise the filide.", "logic": "\nNonpublic(melitta)\nShed(marjorie, dunstan)\nNonpublic(marjorie)\nGlittering(marjorie)\nnot Nasalise(filide, dunstan)\nPlease(dunstan, filide)\nNonpublic(dunstan)\nforall x (Shed(x, melitta) -> Nasalise(melitta, dunstan))\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) and not Shed(x, filide) -> Nasalise(filide, melitta))\nforall x (Please(x, filide) and Hugoesque(filide) -> not Nasalise(filide, melitta))\nforall x (Shed(x, dunstan) and Please(x, filide) -> not Abridged(x))\nnot Shed(filide, marjorie) -> Please(filide, marjorie)\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Nasalise(x, filide))\nNonpublic(dunstan) -> Shed(dunstan, melitta)\nforall x (Nasalise(x, dunstan) -> not Abridged(dunstan))\n\nNasalise(dunstan, filide)\n\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Nasalise(x, filide)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The vena is rhizoidal. The madge avenge the raymond. The madge is rhizoidal. The madge is opening. The tynan does not visit the raymond. The raymond dull the tynan. The raymond is rhizoidal. If someone avenge the vena then the vena spear the raymond. If someone is rhizoidal and they do not eat the tynan then the tynan spear the vena. If someone dull the tynan and the tynan is inhibited then the tynan does not visit the vena. If someone avenge the raymond and they chase the tynan then they are not apologetic. If the tynan does not eat the madge then the tynan dull the madge. If someone is apologetic then they visit the tynan. If the raymond is rhizoidal then the raymond avenge the vena. If someone spear the raymond then the raymond is not apologetic. The vena does not chase the madge.", "logic": "\nRhizoidal(vena)\nAvenge(madge, raymond)\nRhizoidal(madge)\nOpening(madge)\nnot Spear(tynan, raymond)\nDull(raymond, tynan)\nRhizoidal(raymond)\nforall x (Avenge(x, vena) -> Spear(vena, raymond))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) and not Avenge(x, tynan) -> Spear(tynan, vena))\nforall x (Dull(x, tynan) and Inhibited(tynan) -> not Spear(tynan, vena))\nforall x (Avenge(x, raymond) and Dull(x, tynan) -> not Apologetic(x))\nnot Avenge(tynan, madge) -> Dull(tynan, madge)\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Spear(x, tynan))\nRhizoidal(raymond) -> Avenge(raymond, vena)\nforall x (Spear(x, raymond) -> not Apologetic(raymond))\n\nnot Dull(vena, madge)\n\nnot Dull(vena, madge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The patrick is steepish. The odin elegise the adam. The odin is steepish. The odin is loquacious. The antonina does not visit the adam. The adam eradicate the antonina. The adam is steepish. If someone elegise the patrick then the patrick strip the adam. If someone is steepish and they do not eat the antonina then the antonina strip the patrick. If someone eradicate the antonina and the antonina is bungaloid then the antonina does not visit the patrick. If someone elegise the adam and they chase the antonina then they are not sternal. If the antonina does not eat the odin then the antonina eradicate the odin. If someone is sternal then they visit the antonina. If the adam is steepish then the adam elegise the patrick. If someone strip the adam then the adam is not sternal. The patrick is loquacious.", "logic": "\nSteepish(patrick)\nElegise(odin, adam)\nSteepish(odin)\nLoquacious(odin)\nnot Strip(antonina, adam)\nEradicate(adam, antonina)\nSteepish(adam)\nforall x (Elegise(x, patrick) -> Strip(patrick, adam))\nforall x (Steepish(x) and not Elegise(x, antonina) -> Strip(antonina, patrick))\nforall x (Eradicate(x, antonina) and Bungaloid(antonina) -> not Strip(antonina, patrick))\nforall x (Elegise(x, adam) and Eradicate(x, antonina) -> not Sternal(x))\nnot Elegise(antonina, odin) -> Eradicate(antonina, odin)\nforall x (Sternal(x) -> Strip(x, antonina))\nSteepish(adam) -> Elegise(adam, patrick)\nforall x (Strip(x, adam) -> not Sternal(adam))\n\nLoquacious(patrick)\n\nLoquacious(patrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The kathy is worrisome. The nikos putt the spense. The nikos is worrisome. The nikos is boneless. The ernest does not visit the spense. The spense clack the ernest. The spense is worrisome. If someone putt the kathy then the kathy instrument the spense. If someone is worrisome and they do not eat the ernest then the ernest instrument the kathy. If someone clack the ernest and the ernest is unpainful then the ernest does not visit the kathy. If someone putt the spense and they chase the ernest then they are not sagittal. If the ernest does not eat the nikos then the ernest clack the nikos. If someone is sagittal then they visit the ernest. If the spense is worrisome then the spense putt the kathy. If someone instrument the spense then the spense is not sagittal. The kathy is not rough.", "logic": "\nWorrisome(kathy)\nPutt(nikos, spense)\nWorrisome(nikos)\nBoneless(nikos)\nnot Instrument(ernest, spense)\nClack(spense, ernest)\nWorrisome(spense)\nforall x (Putt(x, kathy) -> Instrument(kathy, spense))\nforall x (Worrisome(x) and not Putt(x, ernest) -> Instrument(ernest, kathy))\nforall x (Clack(x, ernest) and Unpainful(ernest) -> not Instrument(ernest, kathy))\nforall x (Putt(x, spense) and Clack(x, ernest) -> not Sagittal(x))\nnot Putt(ernest, nikos) -> Clack(ernest, nikos)\nforall x (Sagittal(x) -> Instrument(x, ernest))\nWorrisome(spense) -> Putt(spense, kathy)\nforall x (Instrument(x, spense) -> not Sagittal(spense))\n\nnot Rough(kathy)\n\nnot Rough(kathy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The avrit is redux. The lenore recoil the hyacinth. The lenore is redux. The lenore is nutrient. The gretel does not visit the hyacinth. The hyacinth grow the gretel. The hyacinth is redux. If someone recoil the avrit then the avrit distil the hyacinth. If someone is redux and they do not eat the gretel then the gretel distil the avrit. If someone grow the gretel and the gretel is woeful then the gretel does not visit the avrit. If someone recoil the hyacinth and they chase the gretel then they are not teensy. If the gretel does not eat the lenore then the gretel grow the lenore. If someone is teensy then they visit the gretel. If the hyacinth is redux then the hyacinth recoil the avrit. If someone distil the hyacinth then the hyacinth is not teensy. The lenore grow the avrit.", "logic": "\nRedux(avrit)\nRecoil(lenore, hyacinth)\nRedux(lenore)\nNutrient(lenore)\nnot Distil(gretel, hyacinth)\nGrow(hyacinth, gretel)\nRedux(hyacinth)\nforall x (Recoil(x, avrit) -> Distil(avrit, hyacinth))\nforall x (Redux(x) and not Recoil(x, gretel) -> Distil(gretel, avrit))\nforall x (Grow(x, gretel) and Woeful(gretel) -> not Distil(gretel, avrit))\nforall x (Recoil(x, hyacinth) and Grow(x, gretel) -> not Teensy(x))\nnot Recoil(gretel, lenore) -> Grow(gretel, lenore)\nforall x (Teensy(x) -> Distil(x, gretel))\nRedux(hyacinth) -> Recoil(hyacinth, avrit)\nforall x (Distil(x, hyacinth) -> not Teensy(hyacinth))\n\nGrow(lenore, avrit)\n\nGrow(lenore, avrit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "Estella is swart. Estella is backstairs. Estella is glorious. Estella is unnumbered. Clotilda is mercerised. Clotilda is glorious. Clotilda is unnumbered. Clotilda is usurious. Winford is swart. Winford is mercerised. Winford is glorious. Winford is usurious. Kind, glorious people are mercerised. All unnumbered, glorious people are mercerised. If someone is swart and unnumbered then they are illusory. If Estella is backstairs and Estella is unnumbered then Estella is usurious. If someone is mercerised and backstairs then they are swart. All unnumbered, usurious people are glorious. If someone is usurious and illusory then they are mercerised. If someone is usurious then they are backstairs. Estella is unnumbered.", "logic": "\nSwart(estella)\nBackstairs(estella)\nGlorious(estella)\nUnnumbered(estella)\nMercerised(clotilda)\nGlorious(clotilda)\nUnnumbered(clotilda)\nUsurious(clotilda)\nSwart(winford)\nMercerised(winford)\nGlorious(winford)\nUsurious(winford)\nforall x (Illusory(x) and Glorious(x) -> Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Unnumbered(x) and Glorious(x) -> Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Swart(x) and Unnumbered(x) -> Illusory(x))\nBackstairs(estella) and Unnumbered(estella) -> Usurious(estella)\nforall x (Mercerised(x) and Backstairs(x) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Unnumbered(x) and Usurious(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Usurious(x) and Illusory(x) -> Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Usurious(x) -> Backstairs(x))\n\nUnnumbered(estella)\n\ntherefore Unnumbered(estella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Noami is idiotic. Noami is tapestried. Noami is resounding. Noami is sullen. Rhodia is hmong. Rhodia is resounding. Rhodia is sullen. Rhodia is wordless. Mersey is idiotic. Mersey is hmong. Mersey is resounding. Mersey is wordless. Kind, resounding people are hmong. All sullen, resounding people are hmong. If someone is idiotic and sullen then they are rhymeless. If Noami is tapestried and Noami is sullen then Noami is wordless. If someone is hmong and tapestried then they are idiotic. All sullen, wordless people are resounding. If someone is wordless and rhymeless then they are hmong. If someone is wordless then they are tapestried. Rhodia is not hmong.", "logic": "\nIdiotic(noami)\nTapestried(noami)\nResounding(noami)\nSullen(noami)\nHmong(rhodia)\nResounding(rhodia)\nSullen(rhodia)\nWordless(rhodia)\nIdiotic(mersey)\nHmong(mersey)\nResounding(mersey)\nWordless(mersey)\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) and Resounding(x) -> Hmong(x))\nforall x (Sullen(x) and Resounding(x) -> Hmong(x))\nforall x (Idiotic(x) and Sullen(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nTapestried(noami) and Sullen(noami) -> Wordless(noami)\nforall x (Hmong(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Idiotic(x))\nforall x (Sullen(x) and Wordless(x) -> Resounding(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) and Rhymeless(x) -> Hmong(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Tapestried(x))\n\nnot Hmong(rhodia)\n\ntherefore Hmong(rhodia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Kraig is omniscient. Kraig is brinded. Kraig is unknowable. Kraig is tattered. Lenee is petalous. Lenee is unknowable. Lenee is tattered. Lenee is rightish. Tracey is omniscient. Tracey is petalous. Tracey is unknowable. Tracey is rightish. Kind, unknowable people are petalous. All tattered, unknowable people are petalous. If someone is omniscient and tattered then they are trabecular. If Kraig is brinded and Kraig is tattered then Kraig is rightish. If someone is petalous and brinded then they are omniscient. All tattered, rightish people are unknowable. If someone is rightish and trabecular then they are petalous. If someone is rightish then they are brinded. Kraig is rightish.", "logic": "\nOmniscient(kraig)\nBrinded(kraig)\nUnknowable(kraig)\nTattered(kraig)\nPetalous(lenee)\nUnknowable(lenee)\nTattered(lenee)\nRightish(lenee)\nOmniscient(tracey)\nPetalous(tracey)\nUnknowable(tracey)\nRightish(tracey)\nforall x (Trabecular(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Tattered(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) and Tattered(x) -> Trabecular(x))\nBrinded(kraig) and Tattered(kraig) -> Rightish(kraig)\nforall x (Petalous(x) and Brinded(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Tattered(x) and Rightish(x) -> Unknowable(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) and Trabecular(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Brinded(x))\n\nRightish(kraig)\n\nBrinded(kraig) and Tattered(kraig) and Brinded(kraig) and Tattered(kraig) -> Rightish(kraig) -> therefore Rightish(kraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Stephani is certain. Stephani is dysgenic. Stephani is pavlovian. Stephani is parvenue. Jamima is devoid. Jamima is pavlovian. Jamima is parvenue. Jamima is crisscross. Mitchel is certain. Mitchel is devoid. Mitchel is pavlovian. Mitchel is crisscross. Kind, pavlovian people are devoid. All parvenue, pavlovian people are devoid. If someone is certain and parvenue then they are dysplastic. If Stephani is dysgenic and Stephani is parvenue then Stephani is crisscross. If someone is devoid and dysgenic then they are certain. All parvenue, crisscross people are pavlovian. If someone is crisscross and dysplastic then they are devoid. If someone is crisscross then they are dysgenic. Mitchel is not dysgenic.", "logic": "\nCertain(stephani)\nDysgenic(stephani)\nPavlovian(stephani)\nParvenue(stephani)\nDevoid(jamima)\nPavlovian(jamima)\nParvenue(jamima)\nCrisscross(jamima)\nCertain(mitchel)\nDevoid(mitchel)\nPavlovian(mitchel)\nCrisscross(mitchel)\nforall x (Dysplastic(x) and Pavlovian(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Parvenue(x) and Pavlovian(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Certain(x) and Parvenue(x) -> Dysplastic(x))\nDysgenic(stephani) and Parvenue(stephani) -> Crisscross(stephani)\nforall x (Devoid(x) and Dysgenic(x) -> Certain(x))\nforall x (Parvenue(x) and Crisscross(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Crisscross(x) and Dysplastic(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Crisscross(x) -> Dysgenic(x))\n\nnot Dysgenic(mitchel)\n\nCrisscross(mitchel) and forall x (Crisscross(x) -> Dysgenic(x)) -> therefore Dysgenic(mitchel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Jaimie is conjugate. Jaimie is wound. Jaimie is brooding. Jaimie is enlarged. Morry is pleased. Morry is brooding. Morry is enlarged. Morry is magnetic. Marlane is conjugate. Marlane is pleased. Marlane is brooding. Marlane is magnetic. Kind, brooding people are pleased. All enlarged, brooding people are pleased. If someone is conjugate and enlarged then they are parasitic. If Jaimie is wound and Jaimie is enlarged then Jaimie is magnetic. If someone is pleased and wound then they are conjugate. All enlarged, magnetic people are brooding. If someone is magnetic and parasitic then they are pleased. If someone is magnetic then they are wound. Morry is conjugate.", "logic": "\nConjugate(jaimie)\nWound(jaimie)\nBrooding(jaimie)\nEnlarged(jaimie)\nPleased(morry)\nBrooding(morry)\nEnlarged(morry)\nMagnetic(morry)\nConjugate(marlane)\nPleased(marlane)\nBrooding(marlane)\nMagnetic(marlane)\nforall x (Parasitic(x) and Brooding(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and Brooding(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Conjugate(x) and Enlarged(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nWound(jaimie) and Enlarged(jaimie) -> Magnetic(jaimie)\nforall x (Pleased(x) and Wound(x) -> Conjugate(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and Magnetic(x) -> Brooding(x))\nforall x (Magnetic(x) and Parasitic(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Magnetic(x) -> Wound(x))\n\nConjugate(morry)\n\nMagnetic(morry) and forall x (Magnetic(x) -> Wound(x)) -> therefore Wound(morry) Pleased(morry) and Wound(morry) and forall x (Pleased(x) and Wound(x) -> Conjugate(x)) -> therefore Conjugate(morry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Genovera is masterly. Genovera is vapourish. Genovera is diagnostic. Genovera is pemphigous. Israel is unsigned. Israel is diagnostic. Israel is pemphigous. Israel is robotlike. Gregory is masterly. Gregory is unsigned. Gregory is diagnostic. Gregory is robotlike. Kind, diagnostic people are unsigned. All pemphigous, diagnostic people are unsigned. If someone is masterly and pemphigous then they are purulent. If Genovera is vapourish and Genovera is pemphigous then Genovera is robotlike. If someone is unsigned and vapourish then they are masterly. All pemphigous, robotlike people are diagnostic. If someone is robotlike and purulent then they are unsigned. If someone is robotlike then they are vapourish. Israel is not masterly.", "logic": "\nMasterly(genovera)\nVapourish(genovera)\nDiagnostic(genovera)\nPemphigous(genovera)\nUnsigned(israel)\nDiagnostic(israel)\nPemphigous(israel)\nRobotlike(israel)\nMasterly(gregory)\nUnsigned(gregory)\nDiagnostic(gregory)\nRobotlike(gregory)\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Diagnostic(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Pemphigous(x) and Diagnostic(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Masterly(x) and Pemphigous(x) -> Purulent(x))\nVapourish(genovera) and Pemphigous(genovera) -> Robotlike(genovera)\nforall x (Unsigned(x) and Vapourish(x) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Pemphigous(x) and Robotlike(x) -> Diagnostic(x))\nforall x (Robotlike(x) and Purulent(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Vapourish(x))\n\nnot Masterly(israel)\n\nRobotlike(israel) and forall x (Robotlike(x) -> Vapourish(x)) -> therefore Vapourish(israel) Unsigned(israel) and Vapourish(israel) and forall x (Unsigned(x) and Vapourish(x) -> Masterly(x)) -> therefore Masterly(israel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Felipe is levantine. Felipe is unclothed. Felipe is unselected. Felipe is cordate. Olga is conserved. Olga is unselected. Olga is cordate. Olga is seeping. Birdie is levantine. Birdie is conserved. Birdie is unselected. Birdie is seeping. Kind, unselected people are conserved. All cordate, unselected people are conserved. If someone is levantine and cordate then they are unbiassed. If Felipe is unclothed and Felipe is cordate then Felipe is seeping. If someone is conserved and unclothed then they are levantine. All cordate, seeping people are unselected. If someone is seeping and unbiassed then they are conserved. If someone is seeping then they are unclothed. Olga is unbiassed.", "logic": "\nLevantine(felipe)\nUnclothed(felipe)\nUnselected(felipe)\nCordate(felipe)\nConserved(olga)\nUnselected(olga)\nCordate(olga)\nSeeping(olga)\nLevantine(birdie)\nConserved(birdie)\nUnselected(birdie)\nSeeping(birdie)\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Unselected(x) -> Conserved(x))\nforall x (Cordate(x) and Unselected(x) -> Conserved(x))\nforall x (Levantine(x) and Cordate(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nUnclothed(felipe) and Cordate(felipe) -> Seeping(felipe)\nforall x (Conserved(x) and Unclothed(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Cordate(x) and Seeping(x) -> Unselected(x))\nforall x (Seeping(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Conserved(x))\nforall x (Seeping(x) -> Unclothed(x))\n\nUnbiassed(olga)\n\nSeeping(olga) and forall x (Seeping(x) -> Unclothed(x)) -> therefore Unclothed(olga) Conserved(olga) and Unclothed(olga) and forall x (Conserved(x) and Unclothed(x) -> Levantine(x)) -> therefore Levantine(olga) Levantine(olga) and Cordate(olga) and forall x (Levantine(x) and Cordate(x) -> Unbiassed(x)) -> therefore Unbiassed(olga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Pieter is drumhead. Pieter is false. Pieter is staple. Pieter is rubbishy. Finn is mordant. Finn is staple. Finn is rubbishy. Finn is cutaneous. Wallace is drumhead. Wallace is mordant. Wallace is staple. Wallace is cutaneous. Kind, staple people are mordant. All rubbishy, staple people are mordant. If someone is drumhead and rubbishy then they are gettable. If Pieter is false and Pieter is rubbishy then Pieter is cutaneous. If someone is mordant and false then they are drumhead. All rubbishy, cutaneous people are staple. If someone is cutaneous and gettable then they are mordant. If someone is cutaneous then they are false. Finn is not gettable.", "logic": "\nDrumhead(pieter)\nFalse(pieter)\nStaple(pieter)\nRubbishy(pieter)\nMordant(finn)\nStaple(finn)\nRubbishy(finn)\nCutaneous(finn)\nDrumhead(wallace)\nMordant(wallace)\nStaple(wallace)\nCutaneous(wallace)\nforall x (Gettable(x) and Staple(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) and Staple(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) and Rubbishy(x) -> Gettable(x))\nFalse(pieter) and Rubbishy(pieter) -> Cutaneous(pieter)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and False(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) and Cutaneous(x) -> Staple(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) and Gettable(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> False(x))\n\nnot Gettable(finn)\n\nCutaneous(finn) and forall x (Cutaneous(x) -> False(x)) -> therefore False(finn) Mordant(finn) and False(finn) and forall x (Mordant(x) and False(x) -> Drumhead(x)) -> therefore Drumhead(finn) Drumhead(finn) and Rubbishy(finn) and forall x (Drumhead(x) and Rubbishy(x) -> Gettable(x)) -> therefore Gettable(finn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Karoly is preferred. Karoly is after. Karoly is gettable. Karoly is sanative. Lidia is witting. Lidia is gettable. Lidia is sanative. Lidia is destroyed. Imojean is preferred. Imojean is witting. Imojean is gettable. Imojean is destroyed. Kind, gettable people are witting. All sanative, gettable people are witting. If someone is preferred and sanative then they are amerindic. If Karoly is after and Karoly is sanative then Karoly is destroyed. If someone is witting and after then they are preferred. All sanative, destroyed people are gettable. If someone is destroyed and amerindic then they are witting. If someone is destroyed then they are after. Imojean is not amerindic.", "logic": "\nPreferred(karoly)\nAfter(karoly)\nGettable(karoly)\nSanative(karoly)\nWitting(lidia)\nGettable(lidia)\nSanative(lidia)\nDestroyed(lidia)\nPreferred(imojean)\nWitting(imojean)\nGettable(imojean)\nDestroyed(imojean)\nforall x (Amerindic(x) and Gettable(x) -> Witting(x))\nforall x (Sanative(x) and Gettable(x) -> Witting(x))\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Sanative(x) -> Amerindic(x))\nAfter(karoly) and Sanative(karoly) -> Destroyed(karoly)\nforall x (Witting(x) and After(x) -> Preferred(x))\nforall x (Sanative(x) and Destroyed(x) -> Gettable(x))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) and Amerindic(x) -> Witting(x))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) -> After(x))\n\nnot Amerindic(imojean)\n\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Sanative(x) -> Amerindic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Godart is venturous. Godart is profane. Godart is toilsome. Godart is geodetic. Kevyn is sound. Kevyn is toilsome. Kevyn is geodetic. Kevyn is muggy. Weston is venturous. Weston is sound. Weston is toilsome. Weston is muggy. Kind, toilsome people are sound. All geodetic, toilsome people are sound. If someone is venturous and geodetic then they are unswerving. If Godart is profane and Godart is geodetic then Godart is muggy. If someone is sound and profane then they are venturous. All geodetic, muggy people are toilsome. If someone is muggy and unswerving then they are sound. If someone is muggy then they are profane. Weston is geodetic.", "logic": "\nVenturous(godart)\nProfane(godart)\nToilsome(godart)\nGeodetic(godart)\nSound(kevyn)\nToilsome(kevyn)\nGeodetic(kevyn)\nMuggy(kevyn)\nVenturous(weston)\nSound(weston)\nToilsome(weston)\nMuggy(weston)\nforall x (Unswerving(x) and Toilsome(x) -> Sound(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) and Toilsome(x) -> Sound(x))\nforall x (Venturous(x) and Geodetic(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nProfane(godart) and Geodetic(godart) -> Muggy(godart)\nforall x (Sound(x) and Profane(x) -> Venturous(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) and Muggy(x) -> Toilsome(x))\nforall x (Muggy(x) and Unswerving(x) -> Sound(x))\nforall x (Muggy(x) -> Profane(x))\n\nGeodetic(weston)\n\nGeodetic(weston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "The brooks is legion. The brooks is neandertal. The brooks does not need the delphine. The brooks telegraph the licha. The brooks telegraph the delphine. The brooks confine the licha. The brooks does not visit the delphine. The licha sodomize the brooks. The licha sodomize the delphine. The licha confine the brooks. The delphine is legion. The delphine is neandertal. The delphine sodomize the brooks. The delphine telegraph the brooks. The delphine confine the licha. If something confine the brooks and it does not see the licha then the brooks is legion. If something is legion and it confine the delphine then it telegraph the delphine. If the delphine telegraph the licha then the licha is neandertal. If something confine the brooks and it is pyknotic then the brooks does not visit the licha. If something confine the brooks and it is ascosporic then it is dismissed. If something is pyknotic then it confine the delphine. If something confine the licha and the licha sodomize the delphine then the delphine is pyknotic. If something telegraph the delphine and the delphine telegraph the licha then the licha does not need the brooks. The licha sodomize the brooks.", "logic": "\nLegion(brooks)\nNeandertal(brooks)\nnot Sodomize(brooks, delphine)\nTelegraph(brooks, licha)\nTelegraph(brooks, delphine)\nConfine(brooks, licha)\nnot Confine(brooks, delphine)\nSodomize(licha, brooks)\nSodomize(licha, delphine)\nConfine(licha, brooks)\nLegion(delphine)\nNeandertal(delphine)\nSodomize(delphine, brooks)\nTelegraph(delphine, brooks)\nConfine(delphine, licha)\nforall x (Confine(x, brooks) and not Telegraph(x, licha) -> Legion(brooks))\nforall x (Legion(x) and Confine(x, delphine) -> Telegraph(x, delphine))\nTelegraph(delphine, licha) -> Neandertal(licha)\nforall x (Confine(x, brooks) and Pyknotic(x) -> not Confine(brooks, licha))\nforall x (Confine(x, brooks) and Ascosporic(x) -> Dismissed(x))\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Confine(x, delphine))\nforall x (Confine(x, licha) and Sodomize(licha, delphine) -> Pyknotic(delphine))\nforall x (Telegraph(x, delphine) and Telegraph(delphine, licha) -> not Sodomize(licha, brooks))\n\nSodomize(licha, brooks)\n\ntherefore Sodomize(licha, brooks)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The melissa is anagogical. The melissa is polished. The melissa does not need the tito. The melissa affront the annalena. The melissa affront the tito. The melissa concentre the annalena. The melissa does not visit the tito. The annalena summate the melissa. The annalena summate the tito. The annalena concentre the melissa. The tito is anagogical. The tito is polished. The tito summate the melissa. The tito affront the melissa. The tito concentre the annalena. If something concentre the melissa and it does not see the annalena then the melissa is anagogical. If something is anagogical and it concentre the tito then it affront the tito. If the tito affront the annalena then the annalena is polished. If something concentre the melissa and it is entrancing then the melissa does not visit the annalena. If something concentre the melissa and it is sighted then it is balconied. If something is entrancing then it concentre the tito. If something concentre the annalena and the annalena summate the tito then the tito is entrancing. If something affront the tito and the tito affront the annalena then the annalena does not need the melissa. The annalena does not need the melissa.", "logic": "\nAnagogical(melissa)\nPolished(melissa)\nnot Summate(melissa, tito)\nAffront(melissa, annalena)\nAffront(melissa, tito)\nConcentre(melissa, annalena)\nnot Concentre(melissa, tito)\nSummate(annalena, melissa)\nSummate(annalena, tito)\nConcentre(annalena, melissa)\nAnagogical(tito)\nPolished(tito)\nSummate(tito, melissa)\nAffront(tito, melissa)\nConcentre(tito, annalena)\nforall x (Concentre(x, melissa) and not Affront(x, annalena) -> Anagogical(melissa))\nforall x (Anagogical(x) and Concentre(x, tito) -> Affront(x, tito))\nAffront(tito, annalena) -> Polished(annalena)\nforall x (Concentre(x, melissa) and Entrancing(x) -> not Concentre(melissa, annalena))\nforall x (Concentre(x, melissa) and Sighted(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) -> Concentre(x, tito))\nforall x (Concentre(x, annalena) and Summate(annalena, tito) -> Entrancing(tito))\nforall x (Affront(x, tito) and Affront(tito, annalena) -> not Summate(annalena, melissa))\n\nnot Summate(annalena, melissa)\n\ntherefore Summate(annalena, melissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The will is viewless. The will is underhung. The will does not need the maye. The will quilt the carolie. The will quilt the maye. The will debit the carolie. The will does not visit the maye. The carolie deter the will. The carolie deter the maye. The carolie debit the will. The maye is viewless. The maye is underhung. The maye deter the will. The maye quilt the will. The maye debit the carolie. If something debit the will and it does not see the carolie then the will is viewless. If something is viewless and it debit the maye then it quilt the maye. If the maye quilt the carolie then the carolie is underhung. If something debit the will and it is craved then the will does not visit the carolie. If something debit the will and it is turkish then it is conical. If something is craved then it debit the maye. If something debit the carolie and the carolie deter the maye then the maye is craved. If something quilt the maye and the maye quilt the carolie then the carolie does not need the will. The maye is craved.", "logic": "\nViewless(will)\nUnderhung(will)\nnot Deter(will, maye)\nQuilt(will, carolie)\nQuilt(will, maye)\nDebit(will, carolie)\nnot Debit(will, maye)\nDeter(carolie, will)\nDeter(carolie, maye)\nDebit(carolie, will)\nViewless(maye)\nUnderhung(maye)\nDeter(maye, will)\nQuilt(maye, will)\nDebit(maye, carolie)\nforall x (Debit(x, will) and not Quilt(x, carolie) -> Viewless(will))\nforall x (Viewless(x) and Debit(x, maye) -> Quilt(x, maye))\nQuilt(maye, carolie) -> Underhung(carolie)\nforall x (Debit(x, will) and Craved(x) -> not Debit(will, carolie))\nforall x (Debit(x, will) and Turkish(x) -> Conical(x))\nforall x (Craved(x) -> Debit(x, maye))\nforall x (Debit(x, carolie) and Deter(carolie, maye) -> Craved(maye))\nforall x (Quilt(x, maye) and Quilt(maye, carolie) -> not Deter(carolie, will))\n\nCraved(maye)\n\nDebit(maye, carolie) and Deter(carolie, maye) and forall x (Debit(x, carolie) and Deter(carolie, maye) -> Craved(maye)) -> therefore Craved(maye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The willdon is select. The willdon is uncoated. The willdon does not need the darren. The willdon cotton the rickey. The willdon cotton the darren. The willdon retrograde the rickey. The willdon does not visit the darren. The rickey widen the willdon. The rickey widen the darren. The rickey retrograde the willdon. The darren is select. The darren is uncoated. The darren widen the willdon. The darren cotton the willdon. The darren retrograde the rickey. If something retrograde the willdon and it does not see the rickey then the willdon is select. If something is select and it retrograde the darren then it cotton the darren. If the darren cotton the rickey then the rickey is uncoated. If something retrograde the willdon and it is unverified then the willdon does not visit the rickey. If something retrograde the willdon and it is ionic then it is dustlike. If something is unverified then it retrograde the darren. If something retrograde the rickey and the rickey widen the darren then the darren is unverified. If something cotton the darren and the darren cotton the rickey then the rickey does not need the willdon. The darren is not unverified.", "logic": "\nSelect(willdon)\nUncoated(willdon)\nnot Widen(willdon, darren)\nCotton(willdon, rickey)\nCotton(willdon, darren)\nRetrograde(willdon, rickey)\nnot Retrograde(willdon, darren)\nWiden(rickey, willdon)\nWiden(rickey, darren)\nRetrograde(rickey, willdon)\nSelect(darren)\nUncoated(darren)\nWiden(darren, willdon)\nCotton(darren, willdon)\nRetrograde(darren, rickey)\nforall x (Retrograde(x, willdon) and not Cotton(x, rickey) -> Select(willdon))\nforall x (Select(x) and Retrograde(x, darren) -> Cotton(x, darren))\nCotton(darren, rickey) -> Uncoated(rickey)\nforall x (Retrograde(x, willdon) and Unverified(x) -> not Retrograde(willdon, rickey))\nforall x (Retrograde(x, willdon) and Ionic(x) -> Dustlike(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) -> Retrograde(x, darren))\nforall x (Retrograde(x, rickey) and Widen(rickey, darren) -> Unverified(darren))\nforall x (Cotton(x, darren) and Cotton(darren, rickey) -> not Widen(rickey, willdon))\n\nnot Unverified(darren)\n\nRetrograde(darren, rickey) and Widen(rickey, darren) and forall x (Retrograde(x, rickey) and Widen(rickey, darren) -> Unverified(darren)) -> therefore Unverified(darren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The davon is polluted. The davon is kafkaesque. The davon does not need the mada. The davon redeposit the thornton. The davon redeposit the mada. The davon brecciate the thornton. The davon does not visit the mada. The thornton tickle the davon. The thornton tickle the mada. The thornton brecciate the davon. The mada is polluted. The mada is kafkaesque. The mada tickle the davon. The mada redeposit the davon. The mada brecciate the thornton. If something brecciate the davon and it does not see the thornton then the davon is polluted. If something is polluted and it brecciate the mada then it redeposit the mada. If the mada redeposit the thornton then the thornton is kafkaesque. If something brecciate the davon and it is shakeable then the davon does not visit the thornton. If something brecciate the davon and it is unmarked then it is norman. If something is shakeable then it brecciate the mada. If something brecciate the thornton and the thornton tickle the mada then the mada is shakeable. If something redeposit the mada and the mada redeposit the thornton then the thornton does not need the davon. The mada brecciate the mada.", "logic": "\nPolluted(davon)\nKafkaesque(davon)\nnot Tickle(davon, mada)\nRedeposit(davon, thornton)\nRedeposit(davon, mada)\nBrecciate(davon, thornton)\nnot Brecciate(davon, mada)\nTickle(thornton, davon)\nTickle(thornton, mada)\nBrecciate(thornton, davon)\nPolluted(mada)\nKafkaesque(mada)\nTickle(mada, davon)\nRedeposit(mada, davon)\nBrecciate(mada, thornton)\nforall x (Brecciate(x, davon) and not Redeposit(x, thornton) -> Polluted(davon))\nforall x (Polluted(x) and Brecciate(x, mada) -> Redeposit(x, mada))\nRedeposit(mada, thornton) -> Kafkaesque(thornton)\nforall x (Brecciate(x, davon) and Shakeable(x) -> not Brecciate(davon, thornton))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, davon) and Unmarked(x) -> Norman(x))\nforall x (Shakeable(x) -> Brecciate(x, mada))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, thornton) and Tickle(thornton, mada) -> Shakeable(mada))\nforall x (Redeposit(x, mada) and Redeposit(mada, thornton) -> not Tickle(thornton, davon))\n\nBrecciate(mada, mada)\n\nBrecciate(mada, thornton) and Tickle(thornton, mada) and forall x (Brecciate(x, thornton) and Tickle(thornton, mada) -> Shakeable(mada)) -> therefore Shakeable(mada) Shakeable(mada) and forall x (Shakeable(x) -> Brecciate(x, mada)) -> therefore Brecciate(mada, mada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The ethan is prodromic. The ethan is shelfy. The ethan does not need the yigal. The ethan profiteer the maureen. The ethan profiteer the yigal. The ethan thwart the maureen. The ethan does not visit the yigal. The maureen stammer the ethan. The maureen stammer the yigal. The maureen thwart the ethan. The yigal is prodromic. The yigal is shelfy. The yigal stammer the ethan. The yigal profiteer the ethan. The yigal thwart the maureen. If something thwart the ethan and it does not see the maureen then the ethan is prodromic. If something is prodromic and it thwart the yigal then it profiteer the yigal. If the yigal profiteer the maureen then the maureen is shelfy. If something thwart the ethan and it is chagrined then the ethan does not visit the maureen. If something thwart the ethan and it is galvanic then it is overmodest. If something is chagrined then it thwart the yigal. If something thwart the maureen and the maureen stammer the yigal then the yigal is chagrined. If something profiteer the yigal and the yigal profiteer the maureen then the maureen does not need the ethan. The yigal does not visit the yigal.", "logic": "\nProdromic(ethan)\nShelfy(ethan)\nnot Stammer(ethan, yigal)\nProfiteer(ethan, maureen)\nProfiteer(ethan, yigal)\nThwart(ethan, maureen)\nnot Thwart(ethan, yigal)\nStammer(maureen, ethan)\nStammer(maureen, yigal)\nThwart(maureen, ethan)\nProdromic(yigal)\nShelfy(yigal)\nStammer(yigal, ethan)\nProfiteer(yigal, ethan)\nThwart(yigal, maureen)\nforall x (Thwart(x, ethan) and not Profiteer(x, maureen) -> Prodromic(ethan))\nforall x (Prodromic(x) and Thwart(x, yigal) -> Profiteer(x, yigal))\nProfiteer(yigal, maureen) -> Shelfy(maureen)\nforall x (Thwart(x, ethan) and Chagrined(x) -> not Thwart(ethan, maureen))\nforall x (Thwart(x, ethan) and Galvanic(x) -> Overmodest(x))\nforall x (Chagrined(x) -> Thwart(x, yigal))\nforall x (Thwart(x, maureen) and Stammer(maureen, yigal) -> Chagrined(yigal))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, yigal) and Profiteer(yigal, maureen) -> not Stammer(maureen, ethan))\n\nnot Thwart(yigal, yigal)\n\nThwart(yigal, maureen) and Stammer(maureen, yigal) and forall x (Thwart(x, maureen) and Stammer(maureen, yigal) -> Chagrined(yigal)) -> therefore Chagrined(yigal) Chagrined(yigal) and forall x (Chagrined(x) -> Thwart(x, yigal)) -> therefore Thwart(yigal, yigal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The elvera is farcical. The elvera is rapt. The elvera does not need the shalom. The elvera encrimson the jameson. The elvera encrimson the shalom. The elvera garland the jameson. The elvera does not visit the shalom. The jameson intrust the elvera. The jameson intrust the shalom. The jameson garland the elvera. The shalom is farcical. The shalom is rapt. The shalom intrust the elvera. The shalom encrimson the elvera. The shalom garland the jameson. If something garland the elvera and it does not see the jameson then the elvera is farcical. If something is farcical and it garland the shalom then it encrimson the shalom. If the shalom encrimson the jameson then the jameson is rapt. If something garland the elvera and it is epical then the elvera does not visit the jameson. If something garland the elvera and it is furious then it is enatic. If something is epical then it garland the shalom. If something garland the jameson and the jameson intrust the shalom then the shalom is epical. If something encrimson the shalom and the shalom encrimson the jameson then the jameson does not need the elvera. The shalom encrimson the shalom.", "logic": "\nFarcical(elvera)\nRapt(elvera)\nnot Intrust(elvera, shalom)\nEncrimson(elvera, jameson)\nEncrimson(elvera, shalom)\nGarland(elvera, jameson)\nnot Garland(elvera, shalom)\nIntrust(jameson, elvera)\nIntrust(jameson, shalom)\nGarland(jameson, elvera)\nFarcical(shalom)\nRapt(shalom)\nIntrust(shalom, elvera)\nEncrimson(shalom, elvera)\nGarland(shalom, jameson)\nforall x (Garland(x, elvera) and not Encrimson(x, jameson) -> Farcical(elvera))\nforall x (Farcical(x) and Garland(x, shalom) -> Encrimson(x, shalom))\nEncrimson(shalom, jameson) -> Rapt(jameson)\nforall x (Garland(x, elvera) and Epical(x) -> not Garland(elvera, jameson))\nforall x (Garland(x, elvera) and Furious(x) -> Enatic(x))\nforall x (Epical(x) -> Garland(x, shalom))\nforall x (Garland(x, jameson) and Intrust(jameson, shalom) -> Epical(shalom))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, shalom) and Encrimson(shalom, jameson) -> not Intrust(jameson, elvera))\n\nEncrimson(shalom, shalom)\n\nGarland(shalom, jameson) and Intrust(jameson, shalom) and forall x (Garland(x, jameson) and Intrust(jameson, shalom) -> Epical(shalom)) -> therefore Epical(shalom) Epical(shalom) and forall x (Epical(x) -> Garland(x, shalom)) -> therefore Garland(shalom, shalom) Farcical(shalom) and Garland(shalom, shalom) and forall x (Farcical(x) and Garland(x, shalom) -> Encrimson(x, shalom)) -> therefore Encrimson(shalom, shalom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The gladys is executable. The gladys is hepatic. The gladys does not need the kevan. The gladys replete the bernette. The gladys replete the kevan. The gladys essay the bernette. The gladys does not visit the kevan. The bernette quip the gladys. The bernette quip the kevan. The bernette essay the gladys. The kevan is executable. The kevan is hepatic. The kevan quip the gladys. The kevan replete the gladys. The kevan essay the bernette. If something essay the gladys and it does not see the bernette then the gladys is executable. If something is executable and it essay the kevan then it replete the kevan. If the kevan replete the bernette then the bernette is hepatic. If something essay the gladys and it is oblate then the gladys does not visit the bernette. If something essay the gladys and it is armlike then it is uncomplete. If something is oblate then it essay the kevan. If something essay the bernette and the bernette quip the kevan then the kevan is oblate. If something replete the kevan and the kevan replete the bernette then the bernette does not need the gladys. The kevan does not see the kevan.", "logic": "\nExecutable(gladys)\nHepatic(gladys)\nnot Quip(gladys, kevan)\nReplete(gladys, bernette)\nReplete(gladys, kevan)\nEssay(gladys, bernette)\nnot Essay(gladys, kevan)\nQuip(bernette, gladys)\nQuip(bernette, kevan)\nEssay(bernette, gladys)\nExecutable(kevan)\nHepatic(kevan)\nQuip(kevan, gladys)\nReplete(kevan, gladys)\nEssay(kevan, bernette)\nforall x (Essay(x, gladys) and not Replete(x, bernette) -> Executable(gladys))\nforall x (Executable(x) and Essay(x, kevan) -> Replete(x, kevan))\nReplete(kevan, bernette) -> Hepatic(bernette)\nforall x (Essay(x, gladys) and Oblate(x) -> not Essay(gladys, bernette))\nforall x (Essay(x, gladys) and Armlike(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nforall x (Oblate(x) -> Essay(x, kevan))\nforall x (Essay(x, bernette) and Quip(bernette, kevan) -> Oblate(kevan))\nforall x (Replete(x, kevan) and Replete(kevan, bernette) -> not Quip(bernette, gladys))\n\nnot Replete(kevan, kevan)\n\nEssay(kevan, bernette) and Quip(bernette, kevan) and forall x (Essay(x, bernette) and Quip(bernette, kevan) -> Oblate(kevan)) -> therefore Oblate(kevan) Oblate(kevan) and forall x (Oblate(x) -> Essay(x, kevan)) -> therefore Essay(kevan, kevan) Executable(kevan) and Essay(kevan, kevan) and forall x (Executable(x) and Essay(x, kevan) -> Replete(x, kevan)) -> therefore Replete(kevan, kevan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The van is araneidal. The van is carbolated. The van does not need the abdel. The van outbalance the elysee. The van outbalance the abdel. The van polemicize the elysee. The van does not visit the abdel. The elysee foist the van. The elysee foist the abdel. The elysee polemicize the van. The abdel is araneidal. The abdel is carbolated. The abdel foist the van. The abdel outbalance the van. The abdel polemicize the elysee. If something polemicize the van and it does not see the elysee then the van is araneidal. If something is araneidal and it polemicize the abdel then it outbalance the abdel. If the abdel outbalance the elysee then the elysee is carbolated. If something polemicize the van and it is primitive then the van does not visit the elysee. If something polemicize the van and it is coloured then it is burlesque. If something is primitive then it polemicize the abdel. If something polemicize the elysee and the elysee foist the abdel then the abdel is primitive. If something outbalance the abdel and the abdel outbalance the elysee then the elysee does not need the van. The van is not burlesque.", "logic": "\nAraneidal(van)\nCarbolated(van)\nnot Foist(van, abdel)\nOutbalance(van, elysee)\nOutbalance(van, abdel)\nPolemicize(van, elysee)\nnot Polemicize(van, abdel)\nFoist(elysee, van)\nFoist(elysee, abdel)\nPolemicize(elysee, van)\nAraneidal(abdel)\nCarbolated(abdel)\nFoist(abdel, van)\nOutbalance(abdel, van)\nPolemicize(abdel, elysee)\nforall x (Polemicize(x, van) and not Outbalance(x, elysee) -> Araneidal(van))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) and Polemicize(x, abdel) -> Outbalance(x, abdel))\nOutbalance(abdel, elysee) -> Carbolated(elysee)\nforall x (Polemicize(x, van) and Primitive(x) -> not Polemicize(van, elysee))\nforall x (Polemicize(x, van) and Coloured(x) -> Burlesque(x))\nforall x (Primitive(x) -> Polemicize(x, abdel))\nforall x (Polemicize(x, elysee) and Foist(elysee, abdel) -> Primitive(abdel))\nforall x (Outbalance(x, abdel) and Outbalance(abdel, elysee) -> not Foist(elysee, van))\n\nnot Burlesque(van)\n\nforall x (Polemicize(x, van) and Coloured(x) -> Burlesque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The vannie is thrillful. The vannie is disgusted. The vannie does not need the kalindi. The vannie blush the emilee. The vannie blush the kalindi. The vannie pare the emilee. The vannie does not visit the kalindi. The emilee spritz the vannie. The emilee spritz the kalindi. The emilee pare the vannie. The kalindi is thrillful. The kalindi is disgusted. The kalindi spritz the vannie. The kalindi blush the vannie. The kalindi pare the emilee. If something pare the vannie and it does not see the emilee then the vannie is thrillful. If something is thrillful and it pare the kalindi then it blush the kalindi. If the kalindi blush the emilee then the emilee is disgusted. If something pare the vannie and it is projecting then the vannie does not visit the emilee. If something pare the vannie and it is diverting then it is dubious. If something is projecting then it pare the kalindi. If something pare the emilee and the emilee spritz the kalindi then the kalindi is projecting. If something blush the kalindi and the kalindi blush the emilee then the emilee does not need the vannie. The emilee blush the kalindi.", "logic": "\nThrillful(vannie)\nDisgusted(vannie)\nnot Spritz(vannie, kalindi)\nBlush(vannie, emilee)\nBlush(vannie, kalindi)\nPare(vannie, emilee)\nnot Pare(vannie, kalindi)\nSpritz(emilee, vannie)\nSpritz(emilee, kalindi)\nPare(emilee, vannie)\nThrillful(kalindi)\nDisgusted(kalindi)\nSpritz(kalindi, vannie)\nBlush(kalindi, vannie)\nPare(kalindi, emilee)\nforall x (Pare(x, vannie) and not Blush(x, emilee) -> Thrillful(vannie))\nforall x (Thrillful(x) and Pare(x, kalindi) -> Blush(x, kalindi))\nBlush(kalindi, emilee) -> Disgusted(emilee)\nforall x (Pare(x, vannie) and Projecting(x) -> not Pare(vannie, emilee))\nforall x (Pare(x, vannie) and Diverting(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Projecting(x) -> Pare(x, kalindi))\nforall x (Pare(x, emilee) and Spritz(emilee, kalindi) -> Projecting(kalindi))\nforall x (Blush(x, kalindi) and Blush(kalindi, emilee) -> not Spritz(emilee, vannie))\n\nBlush(emilee, kalindi)\n\nforall x (Thrillful(x) and Pare(x, kalindi) -> Blush(x, kalindi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The dorrie is spatulate. The dorrie is captivated. The dorrie does not need the suzie. The dorrie sterilise the marwin. The dorrie sterilise the suzie. The dorrie rifle the marwin. The dorrie does not visit the suzie. The marwin theorise the dorrie. The marwin theorise the suzie. The marwin rifle the dorrie. The suzie is spatulate. The suzie is captivated. The suzie theorise the dorrie. The suzie sterilise the dorrie. The suzie rifle the marwin. If something rifle the dorrie and it does not see the marwin then the dorrie is spatulate. If something is spatulate and it rifle the suzie then it sterilise the suzie. If the suzie sterilise the marwin then the marwin is captivated. If something rifle the dorrie and it is diabolic then the dorrie does not visit the marwin. If something rifle the dorrie and it is araneidal then it is forensic. If something is diabolic then it rifle the suzie. If something rifle the marwin and the marwin theorise the suzie then the suzie is diabolic. If something sterilise the suzie and the suzie sterilise the marwin then the marwin does not need the dorrie. The marwin is not captivated.", "logic": "\nSpatulate(dorrie)\nCaptivated(dorrie)\nnot Theorise(dorrie, suzie)\nSterilise(dorrie, marwin)\nSterilise(dorrie, suzie)\nRifle(dorrie, marwin)\nnot Rifle(dorrie, suzie)\nTheorise(marwin, dorrie)\nTheorise(marwin, suzie)\nRifle(marwin, dorrie)\nSpatulate(suzie)\nCaptivated(suzie)\nTheorise(suzie, dorrie)\nSterilise(suzie, dorrie)\nRifle(suzie, marwin)\nforall x (Rifle(x, dorrie) and not Sterilise(x, marwin) -> Spatulate(dorrie))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) and Rifle(x, suzie) -> Sterilise(x, suzie))\nSterilise(suzie, marwin) -> Captivated(marwin)\nforall x (Rifle(x, dorrie) and Diabolic(x) -> not Rifle(dorrie, marwin))\nforall x (Rifle(x, dorrie) and Araneidal(x) -> Forensic(x))\nforall x (Diabolic(x) -> Rifle(x, suzie))\nforall x (Rifle(x, marwin) and Theorise(marwin, suzie) -> Diabolic(suzie))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, suzie) and Sterilise(suzie, marwin) -> not Theorise(marwin, dorrie))\n\nnot Captivated(marwin)\n\nSterilise(suzie, marwin) -> Captivated(marwin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The vincents is plumbous. The vincents is manic. The vincents does not need the therine. The vincents devaluate the cicily. The vincents devaluate the therine. The vincents waul the cicily. The vincents does not visit the therine. The cicily ring the vincents. The cicily ring the therine. The cicily waul the vincents. The therine is plumbous. The therine is manic. The therine ring the vincents. The therine devaluate the vincents. The therine waul the cicily. If something waul the vincents and it does not see the cicily then the vincents is plumbous. If something is plumbous and it waul the therine then it devaluate the therine. If the therine devaluate the cicily then the cicily is manic. If something waul the vincents and it is squared then the vincents does not visit the cicily. If something waul the vincents and it is windblown then it is sorbed. If something is squared then it waul the therine. If something waul the cicily and the cicily ring the therine then the therine is squared. If something devaluate the therine and the therine devaluate the cicily then the cicily does not need the vincents. The cicily is sorbed.", "logic": "\nPlumbous(vincents)\nManic(vincents)\nnot Ring(vincents, therine)\nDevaluate(vincents, cicily)\nDevaluate(vincents, therine)\nWaul(vincents, cicily)\nnot Waul(vincents, therine)\nRing(cicily, vincents)\nRing(cicily, therine)\nWaul(cicily, vincents)\nPlumbous(therine)\nManic(therine)\nRing(therine, vincents)\nDevaluate(therine, vincents)\nWaul(therine, cicily)\nforall x (Waul(x, vincents) and not Devaluate(x, cicily) -> Plumbous(vincents))\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Waul(x, therine) -> Devaluate(x, therine))\nDevaluate(therine, cicily) -> Manic(cicily)\nforall x (Waul(x, vincents) and Squared(x) -> not Waul(vincents, cicily))\nforall x (Waul(x, vincents) and Windblown(x) -> Sorbed(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Waul(x, therine))\nforall x (Waul(x, cicily) and Ring(cicily, therine) -> Squared(therine))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, therine) and Devaluate(therine, cicily) -> not Ring(cicily, vincents))\n\nSorbed(cicily)\n\nforall x (Waul(x, vincents) and Windblown(x) -> Sorbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The ertha is trojan. The ertha is judicious. The ertha does not need the ofelia. The ertha pettifog the neille. The ertha pettifog the ofelia. The ertha benday the neille. The ertha does not visit the ofelia. The neille affright the ertha. The neille affright the ofelia. The neille benday the ertha. The ofelia is trojan. The ofelia is judicious. The ofelia affright the ertha. The ofelia pettifog the ertha. The ofelia benday the neille. If something benday the ertha and it does not see the neille then the ertha is trojan. If something is trojan and it benday the ofelia then it pettifog the ofelia. If the ofelia pettifog the neille then the neille is judicious. If something benday the ertha and it is dissolute then the ertha does not visit the neille. If something benday the ertha and it is palatable then it is asymmetric. If something is dissolute then it benday the ofelia. If something benday the neille and the neille affright the ofelia then the ofelia is dissolute. If something pettifog the ofelia and the ofelia pettifog the neille then the neille does not need the ertha. The ofelia does not need the ofelia.", "logic": "\nTrojan(ertha)\nJudicious(ertha)\nnot Affright(ertha, ofelia)\nPettifog(ertha, neille)\nPettifog(ertha, ofelia)\nBenday(ertha, neille)\nnot Benday(ertha, ofelia)\nAffright(neille, ertha)\nAffright(neille, ofelia)\nBenday(neille, ertha)\nTrojan(ofelia)\nJudicious(ofelia)\nAffright(ofelia, ertha)\nPettifog(ofelia, ertha)\nBenday(ofelia, neille)\nforall x (Benday(x, ertha) and not Pettifog(x, neille) -> Trojan(ertha))\nforall x (Trojan(x) and Benday(x, ofelia) -> Pettifog(x, ofelia))\nPettifog(ofelia, neille) -> Judicious(neille)\nforall x (Benday(x, ertha) and Dissolute(x) -> not Benday(ertha, neille))\nforall x (Benday(x, ertha) and Palatable(x) -> Asymmetric(x))\nforall x (Dissolute(x) -> Benday(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Benday(x, neille) and Affright(neille, ofelia) -> Dissolute(ofelia))\nforall x (Pettifog(x, ofelia) and Pettifog(ofelia, neille) -> not Affright(neille, ertha))\n\nnot Affright(ofelia, ofelia)\n\nnot Affright(ofelia, ofelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The aleks is unexpired. The aleks is bespoken. The aleks does not need the karlen. The aleks fool the jelene. The aleks fool the karlen. The aleks bloviate the jelene. The aleks does not visit the karlen. The jelene benefit the aleks. The jelene benefit the karlen. The jelene bloviate the aleks. The karlen is unexpired. The karlen is bespoken. The karlen benefit the aleks. The karlen fool the aleks. The karlen bloviate the jelene. If something bloviate the aleks and it does not see the jelene then the aleks is unexpired. If something is unexpired and it bloviate the karlen then it fool the karlen. If the karlen fool the jelene then the jelene is bespoken. If something bloviate the aleks and it is halfway then the aleks does not visit the jelene. If something bloviate the aleks and it is graded then it is uttered. If something is halfway then it bloviate the karlen. If something bloviate the jelene and the jelene benefit the karlen then the karlen is halfway. If something fool the karlen and the karlen fool the jelene then the jelene does not need the aleks. The aleks is graded.", "logic": "\nUnexpired(aleks)\nBespoken(aleks)\nnot Benefit(aleks, karlen)\nFool(aleks, jelene)\nFool(aleks, karlen)\nBloviate(aleks, jelene)\nnot Bloviate(aleks, karlen)\nBenefit(jelene, aleks)\nBenefit(jelene, karlen)\nBloviate(jelene, aleks)\nUnexpired(karlen)\nBespoken(karlen)\nBenefit(karlen, aleks)\nFool(karlen, aleks)\nBloviate(karlen, jelene)\nforall x (Bloviate(x, aleks) and not Fool(x, jelene) -> Unexpired(aleks))\nforall x (Unexpired(x) and Bloviate(x, karlen) -> Fool(x, karlen))\nFool(karlen, jelene) -> Bespoken(jelene)\nforall x (Bloviate(x, aleks) and Halfway(x) -> not Bloviate(aleks, jelene))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, aleks) and Graded(x) -> Uttered(x))\nforall x (Halfway(x) -> Bloviate(x, karlen))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, jelene) and Benefit(jelene, karlen) -> Halfway(karlen))\nforall x (Fool(x, karlen) and Fool(karlen, jelene) -> not Benefit(jelene, aleks))\n\nGraded(aleks)\n\nGraded(aleks) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The frederico is inharmonic. The frederico is anechoic. The frederico does not need the rebbecca. The frederico whop the petrina. The frederico whop the rebbecca. The frederico predecease the petrina. The frederico does not visit the rebbecca. The petrina advect the frederico. The petrina advect the rebbecca. The petrina predecease the frederico. The rebbecca is inharmonic. The rebbecca is anechoic. The rebbecca advect the frederico. The rebbecca whop the frederico. The rebbecca predecease the petrina. If something predecease the frederico and it does not see the petrina then the frederico is inharmonic. If something is inharmonic and it predecease the rebbecca then it whop the rebbecca. If the rebbecca whop the petrina then the petrina is anechoic. If something predecease the frederico and it is germane then the frederico does not visit the petrina. If something predecease the frederico and it is fuzzy then it is laden. If something is germane then it predecease the rebbecca. If something predecease the petrina and the petrina advect the rebbecca then the rebbecca is germane. If something whop the rebbecca and the rebbecca whop the petrina then the petrina does not need the frederico. The petrina is not inharmonic.", "logic": "\nInharmonic(frederico)\nAnechoic(frederico)\nnot Advect(frederico, rebbecca)\nWhop(frederico, petrina)\nWhop(frederico, rebbecca)\nPredecease(frederico, petrina)\nnot Predecease(frederico, rebbecca)\nAdvect(petrina, frederico)\nAdvect(petrina, rebbecca)\nPredecease(petrina, frederico)\nInharmonic(rebbecca)\nAnechoic(rebbecca)\nAdvect(rebbecca, frederico)\nWhop(rebbecca, frederico)\nPredecease(rebbecca, petrina)\nforall x (Predecease(x, frederico) and not Whop(x, petrina) -> Inharmonic(frederico))\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) and Predecease(x, rebbecca) -> Whop(x, rebbecca))\nWhop(rebbecca, petrina) -> Anechoic(petrina)\nforall x (Predecease(x, frederico) and Germane(x) -> not Predecease(frederico, petrina))\nforall x (Predecease(x, frederico) and Fuzzy(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Germane(x) -> Predecease(x, rebbecca))\nforall x (Predecease(x, petrina) and Advect(petrina, rebbecca) -> Germane(rebbecca))\nforall x (Whop(x, rebbecca) and Whop(rebbecca, petrina) -> not Advect(petrina, frederico))\n\nnot Inharmonic(petrina)\n\nnot Inharmonic(petrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The merle is localised. The merle is leftover. The merle does not need the jeniece. The merle befuddle the malanie. The merle befuddle the jeniece. The merle smite the malanie. The merle does not visit the jeniece. The malanie chine the merle. The malanie chine the jeniece. The malanie smite the merle. The jeniece is localised. The jeniece is leftover. The jeniece chine the merle. The jeniece befuddle the merle. The jeniece smite the malanie. If something smite the merle and it does not see the malanie then the merle is localised. If something is localised and it smite the jeniece then it befuddle the jeniece. If the jeniece befuddle the malanie then the malanie is leftover. If something smite the merle and it is dress then the merle does not visit the malanie. If something smite the merle and it is fretted then it is rejected. If something is dress then it smite the jeniece. If something smite the malanie and the malanie chine the jeniece then the jeniece is dress. If something befuddle the jeniece and the jeniece befuddle the malanie then the malanie does not need the merle. The malanie is dress.", "logic": "\nLocalised(merle)\nLeftover(merle)\nnot Chine(merle, jeniece)\nBefuddle(merle, malanie)\nBefuddle(merle, jeniece)\nSmite(merle, malanie)\nnot Smite(merle, jeniece)\nChine(malanie, merle)\nChine(malanie, jeniece)\nSmite(malanie, merle)\nLocalised(jeniece)\nLeftover(jeniece)\nChine(jeniece, merle)\nBefuddle(jeniece, merle)\nSmite(jeniece, malanie)\nforall x (Smite(x, merle) and not Befuddle(x, malanie) -> Localised(merle))\nforall x (Localised(x) and Smite(x, jeniece) -> Befuddle(x, jeniece))\nBefuddle(jeniece, malanie) -> Leftover(malanie)\nforall x (Smite(x, merle) and Dress(x) -> not Smite(merle, malanie))\nforall x (Smite(x, merle) and Fretted(x) -> Rejected(x))\nforall x (Dress(x) -> Smite(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Smite(x, malanie) and Chine(malanie, jeniece) -> Dress(jeniece))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, jeniece) and Befuddle(jeniece, malanie) -> not Chine(malanie, merle))\n\nDress(malanie)\n\nDress(malanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "Pierce is untenanted. Pierce is capsular. Pierce is nappy. If Pierce is capsular then Pierce is kitschy. Big, cheerful things are rattled. All cheerful things are kitschy. All rattled, capsular things are nappy. If something is nappy then it is untenanted. If something is mediatory and nappy then it is cheerful. If something is nappy and capsular then it is kitschy. Big things are mediatory. Pierce is untenanted.", "logic": "\nUntenanted(pierce)\nCapsular(pierce)\nNappy(pierce)\nCapsular(pierce) -> Kitschy(pierce)\nforall x (Kitschy(x) and Cheerful(x) -> Rattled(x))\nforall x (Cheerful(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) and Capsular(x) -> Nappy(x))\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) and Nappy(x) -> Cheerful(x))\nforall x (Nappy(x) and Capsular(x) -> Kitschy(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Mediatory(x))\n\nUntenanted(pierce)\n\ntherefore Untenanted(pierce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Flore is fortunate. Flore is ameboid. Flore is anaemic. If Flore is ameboid then Flore is shaping. Big, napoleonic things are pasted. All napoleonic things are shaping. All pasted, ameboid things are anaemic. If something is anaemic then it is fortunate. If something is burmese and anaemic then it is napoleonic. If something is anaemic and ameboid then it is shaping. Big things are burmese. Flore is not fortunate.", "logic": "\nFortunate(flore)\nAmeboid(flore)\nAnaemic(flore)\nAmeboid(flore) -> Shaping(flore)\nforall x (Shaping(x) and Napoleonic(x) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Napoleonic(x) -> Shaping(x))\nforall x (Pasted(x) and Ameboid(x) -> Anaemic(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Burmese(x) and Anaemic(x) -> Napoleonic(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) and Ameboid(x) -> Shaping(x))\nforall x (Shaping(x) -> Burmese(x))\n\nnot Fortunate(flore)\n\ntherefore Fortunate(flore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Harli is tilled. Harli is blotto. Harli is unable. If Harli is blotto then Harli is nilpotent. Big, satellite things are incorrupt. All satellite things are nilpotent. All incorrupt, blotto things are unable. If something is unable then it is tilled. If something is colonial and unable then it is satellite. If something is unable and blotto then it is nilpotent. Big things are colonial. Harli is nilpotent.", "logic": "\nTilled(harli)\nBlotto(harli)\nUnable(harli)\nBlotto(harli) -> Nilpotent(harli)\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) and Satellite(x) -> Incorrupt(x))\nforall x (Satellite(x) -> Nilpotent(x))\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) and Blotto(x) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Unable(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) and Unable(x) -> Satellite(x))\nforall x (Unable(x) and Blotto(x) -> Nilpotent(x))\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) -> Colonial(x))\n\nNilpotent(harli)\n\nBlotto(harli) and Blotto(harli) -> Nilpotent(harli) -> therefore Nilpotent(harli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Nichol is penurious. Nichol is platonic. Nichol is french. If Nichol is platonic then Nichol is bilgy. Big, literary things are proustian. All literary things are bilgy. All proustian, platonic things are french. If something is french then it is penurious. If something is aguish and french then it is literary. If something is french and platonic then it is bilgy. Big things are aguish. Nichol is not bilgy.", "logic": "\nPenurious(nichol)\nPlatonic(nichol)\nFrench(nichol)\nPlatonic(nichol) -> Bilgy(nichol)\nforall x (Bilgy(x) and Literary(x) -> Proustian(x))\nforall x (Literary(x) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) and Platonic(x) -> French(x))\nforall x (French(x) -> Penurious(x))\nforall x (Aguish(x) and French(x) -> Literary(x))\nforall x (French(x) and Platonic(x) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Bilgy(x) -> Aguish(x))\n\nnot Bilgy(nichol)\n\nPlatonic(nichol) and Platonic(nichol) -> Bilgy(nichol) -> therefore Bilgy(nichol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Allissa is canonised. Allissa is exploited. Allissa is frumpish. If Allissa is exploited then Allissa is unifying. Big, jolting things are afire. All jolting things are unifying. All afire, exploited things are frumpish. If something is frumpish then it is canonised. If something is starry and frumpish then it is jolting. If something is frumpish and exploited then it is unifying. Big things are starry. Allissa is starry.", "logic": "\nCanonised(allissa)\nExploited(allissa)\nFrumpish(allissa)\nExploited(allissa) -> Unifying(allissa)\nforall x (Unifying(x) and Jolting(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Jolting(x) -> Unifying(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and Exploited(x) -> Frumpish(x))\nforall x (Frumpish(x) -> Canonised(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) and Frumpish(x) -> Jolting(x))\nforall x (Frumpish(x) and Exploited(x) -> Unifying(x))\nforall x (Unifying(x) -> Starry(x))\n\nStarry(allissa)\n\nExploited(allissa) and Exploited(allissa) -> Unifying(allissa) -> therefore Unifying(allissa) Unifying(allissa) and forall x (Unifying(x) -> Starry(x)) -> therefore Starry(allissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Emelita is dappled. Emelita is yearly. Emelita is sturdy. If Emelita is yearly then Emelita is brittle. Big, biramous things are mistakable. All biramous things are brittle. All mistakable, yearly things are sturdy. If something is sturdy then it is dappled. If something is appendant and sturdy then it is biramous. If something is sturdy and yearly then it is brittle. Big things are appendant. Emelita is not appendant.", "logic": "\nDappled(emelita)\nYearly(emelita)\nSturdy(emelita)\nYearly(emelita) -> Brittle(emelita)\nforall x (Brittle(x) and Biramous(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Biramous(x) -> Brittle(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) and Yearly(x) -> Sturdy(x))\nforall x (Sturdy(x) -> Dappled(x))\nforall x (Appendant(x) and Sturdy(x) -> Biramous(x))\nforall x (Sturdy(x) and Yearly(x) -> Brittle(x))\nforall x (Brittle(x) -> Appendant(x))\n\nnot Appendant(emelita)\n\nYearly(emelita) and Yearly(emelita) -> Brittle(emelita) -> therefore Brittle(emelita) Brittle(emelita) and forall x (Brittle(x) -> Appendant(x)) -> therefore Appendant(emelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Cindi is squint. Cindi is corporal. Cindi is glutted. If Cindi is corporal then Cindi is exodontic. Big, clxx things are israeli. All clxx things are exodontic. All israeli, corporal things are glutted. If something is glutted then it is squint. If something is triassic and glutted then it is clxx. If something is glutted and corporal then it is exodontic. Big things are triassic. Cindi is clxx.", "logic": "\nSquint(cindi)\nCorporal(cindi)\nGlutted(cindi)\nCorporal(cindi) -> Exodontic(cindi)\nforall x (Exodontic(x) and Clxx(x) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Exodontic(x))\nforall x (Israeli(x) and Corporal(x) -> Glutted(x))\nforall x (Glutted(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Triassic(x) and Glutted(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Glutted(x) and Corporal(x) -> Exodontic(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) -> Triassic(x))\n\nClxx(cindi)\n\nCorporal(cindi) and Corporal(cindi) -> Exodontic(cindi) -> therefore Exodontic(cindi) Exodontic(cindi) and forall x (Exodontic(x) -> Triassic(x)) -> therefore Triassic(cindi) Triassic(cindi) and Glutted(cindi) and forall x (Triassic(x) and Glutted(x) -> Clxx(x)) -> therefore Clxx(cindi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Georgine is unshaven. Georgine is incisive. Georgine is uncombed. If Georgine is incisive then Georgine is harmonized. Big, compulsive things are slopped. All compulsive things are harmonized. All slopped, incisive things are uncombed. If something is uncombed then it is unshaven. If something is latino and uncombed then it is compulsive. If something is uncombed and incisive then it is harmonized. Big things are latino. Georgine is not compulsive.", "logic": "\nUnshaven(georgine)\nIncisive(georgine)\nUncombed(georgine)\nIncisive(georgine) -> Harmonized(georgine)\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and Compulsive(x) -> Slopped(x))\nforall x (Compulsive(x) -> Harmonized(x))\nforall x (Slopped(x) and Incisive(x) -> Uncombed(x))\nforall x (Uncombed(x) -> Unshaven(x))\nforall x (Latino(x) and Uncombed(x) -> Compulsive(x))\nforall x (Uncombed(x) and Incisive(x) -> Harmonized(x))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) -> Latino(x))\n\nnot Compulsive(georgine)\n\nIncisive(georgine) and Incisive(georgine) -> Harmonized(georgine) -> therefore Harmonized(georgine) Harmonized(georgine) and forall x (Harmonized(x) -> Latino(x)) -> therefore Latino(georgine) Latino(georgine) and Uncombed(georgine) and forall x (Latino(x) and Uncombed(x) -> Compulsive(x)) -> therefore Compulsive(georgine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The broddy hobble the katti. The broddy spank the katti. The broddy is shaded. The broddy is mozambican. The broddy beseem the katti. The katti spank the broddy. The katti is briny. If someone hobble the broddy and they visit the broddy then the broddy is shaded. If someone hobble the katti then they are lowercase. If the broddy spank the katti then the katti is not shaded. If the broddy spank the katti and the broddy hobble the katti then the katti hobble the broddy. If the katti is mozambican then the katti spank the broddy. If someone is briny and unrevived then they visit the broddy. If someone hobble the broddy then they chase the katti. If the broddy spank the katti then the broddy hobble the katti. The broddy hobble the katti.", "logic": "\nHobble(broddy, katti)\nSpank(broddy, katti)\nShaded(broddy)\nMozambican(broddy)\nBeseem(broddy, katti)\nSpank(katti, broddy)\nBriny(katti)\nforall x (Hobble(x, broddy) and Beseem(x, broddy) -> Shaded(broddy))\nforall x (Hobble(x, katti) -> Lowercase(x))\nSpank(broddy, katti) -> not Shaded(katti)\nSpank(broddy, katti) and Hobble(broddy, katti) -> Hobble(katti, broddy)\nMozambican(katti) -> Spank(katti, broddy)\nforall x (Briny(x) and Unrevived(x) -> Beseem(x, broddy))\nforall x (Hobble(x, broddy) -> Hobble(x, katti))\nSpank(broddy, katti) -> Hobble(broddy, katti)\n\nHobble(broddy, katti)\n\ntherefore Hobble(broddy, katti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The beaufort wawl the dwaine. The beaufort calumniate the dwaine. The beaufort is extrusive. The beaufort is unfaceted. The beaufort apostatize the dwaine. The dwaine calumniate the beaufort. The dwaine is asquint. If someone wawl the beaufort and they visit the beaufort then the beaufort is extrusive. If someone wawl the dwaine then they are hindu. If the beaufort calumniate the dwaine then the dwaine is not extrusive. If the beaufort calumniate the dwaine and the beaufort wawl the dwaine then the dwaine wawl the beaufort. If the dwaine is unfaceted then the dwaine calumniate the beaufort. If someone is asquint and overriding then they visit the beaufort. If someone wawl the beaufort then they chase the dwaine. If the beaufort calumniate the dwaine then the beaufort wawl the dwaine. The dwaine is not asquint.", "logic": "\nWawl(beaufort, dwaine)\nCalumniate(beaufort, dwaine)\nExtrusive(beaufort)\nUnfaceted(beaufort)\nApostatize(beaufort, dwaine)\nCalumniate(dwaine, beaufort)\nAsquint(dwaine)\nforall x (Wawl(x, beaufort) and Apostatize(x, beaufort) -> Extrusive(beaufort))\nforall x (Wawl(x, dwaine) -> Hindu(x))\nCalumniate(beaufort, dwaine) -> not Extrusive(dwaine)\nCalumniate(beaufort, dwaine) and Wawl(beaufort, dwaine) -> Wawl(dwaine, beaufort)\nUnfaceted(dwaine) -> Calumniate(dwaine, beaufort)\nforall x (Asquint(x) and Overriding(x) -> Apostatize(x, beaufort))\nforall x (Wawl(x, beaufort) -> Wawl(x, dwaine))\nCalumniate(beaufort, dwaine) -> Wawl(beaufort, dwaine)\n\nnot Asquint(dwaine)\n\ntherefore Asquint(dwaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The andreana novelise the reynold. The andreana channelize the reynold. The andreana is mediated. The andreana is cloze. The andreana fortify the reynold. The reynold channelize the andreana. The reynold is gregorian. If someone novelise the andreana and they visit the andreana then the andreana is mediated. If someone novelise the reynold then they are nigerien. If the andreana channelize the reynold then the reynold is not mediated. If the andreana channelize the reynold and the andreana novelise the reynold then the reynold novelise the andreana. If the reynold is cloze then the reynold channelize the andreana. If someone is gregorian and chassidic then they visit the andreana. If someone novelise the andreana then they chase the reynold. If the andreana channelize the reynold then the andreana novelise the reynold. The andreana is nigerien.", "logic": "\nNovelise(andreana, reynold)\nChannelize(andreana, reynold)\nMediated(andreana)\nCloze(andreana)\nFortify(andreana, reynold)\nChannelize(reynold, andreana)\nGregorian(reynold)\nforall x (Novelise(x, andreana) and Fortify(x, andreana) -> Mediated(andreana))\nforall x (Novelise(x, reynold) -> Nigerien(x))\nChannelize(andreana, reynold) -> not Mediated(reynold)\nChannelize(andreana, reynold) and Novelise(andreana, reynold) -> Novelise(reynold, andreana)\nCloze(reynold) -> Channelize(reynold, andreana)\nforall x (Gregorian(x) and Chassidic(x) -> Fortify(x, andreana))\nforall x (Novelise(x, andreana) -> Novelise(x, reynold))\nChannelize(andreana, reynold) -> Novelise(andreana, reynold)\n\nNigerien(andreana)\n\nNovelise(andreana, reynold) and forall x (Novelise(x, reynold) -> Nigerien(x)) -> therefore Nigerien(andreana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The verla care the janina. The verla tremor the janina. The verla is obliged. The verla is ruthful. The verla eternalise the janina. The janina tremor the verla. The janina is feudatory. If someone care the verla and they visit the verla then the verla is obliged. If someone care the janina then they are systematic. If the verla tremor the janina then the janina is not obliged. If the verla tremor the janina and the verla care the janina then the janina care the verla. If the janina is ruthful then the janina tremor the verla. If someone is feudatory and empyreal then they visit the verla. If someone care the verla then they chase the janina. If the verla tremor the janina then the verla care the janina. The verla is not systematic.", "logic": "\nCare(verla, janina)\nTremor(verla, janina)\nObliged(verla)\nRuthful(verla)\nEternalise(verla, janina)\nTremor(janina, verla)\nFeudatory(janina)\nforall x (Care(x, verla) and Eternalise(x, verla) -> Obliged(verla))\nforall x (Care(x, janina) -> Systematic(x))\nTremor(verla, janina) -> not Obliged(janina)\nTremor(verla, janina) and Care(verla, janina) -> Care(janina, verla)\nRuthful(janina) -> Tremor(janina, verla)\nforall x (Feudatory(x) and Empyreal(x) -> Eternalise(x, verla))\nforall x (Care(x, verla) -> Care(x, janina))\nTremor(verla, janina) -> Care(verla, janina)\n\nnot Systematic(verla)\n\nCare(verla, janina) and forall x (Care(x, janina) -> Systematic(x)) -> therefore Systematic(verla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The tiler shrivel the perl. The tiler sketch the perl. The tiler is consoling. The tiler is cervical. The tiler register the perl. The perl sketch the tiler. The perl is baptized. If someone shrivel the tiler and they visit the tiler then the tiler is consoling. If someone shrivel the perl then they are insular. If the tiler sketch the perl then the perl is not consoling. If the tiler sketch the perl and the tiler shrivel the perl then the perl shrivel the tiler. If the perl is cervical then the perl sketch the tiler. If someone is baptized and stainless then they visit the tiler. If someone shrivel the tiler then they chase the perl. If the tiler sketch the perl then the tiler shrivel the perl. The perl shrivel the perl.", "logic": "\nShrivel(tiler, perl)\nSketch(tiler, perl)\nConsoling(tiler)\nCervical(tiler)\nRegister(tiler, perl)\nSketch(perl, tiler)\nBaptized(perl)\nforall x (Shrivel(x, tiler) and Register(x, tiler) -> Consoling(tiler))\nforall x (Shrivel(x, perl) -> Insular(x))\nSketch(tiler, perl) -> not Consoling(perl)\nSketch(tiler, perl) and Shrivel(tiler, perl) -> Shrivel(perl, tiler)\nCervical(perl) -> Sketch(perl, tiler)\nforall x (Baptized(x) and Stainless(x) -> Register(x, tiler))\nforall x (Shrivel(x, tiler) -> Shrivel(x, perl))\nSketch(tiler, perl) -> Shrivel(tiler, perl)\n\nShrivel(perl, perl)\n\nSketch(tiler, perl) and Shrivel(tiler, perl) and Sketch(tiler, perl) and Shrivel(tiler, perl) -> Shrivel(perl, tiler) -> therefore Shrivel(perl, tiler) Shrivel(perl, tiler) and forall x (Shrivel(x, tiler) -> Shrivel(x, perl)) -> therefore Shrivel(perl, perl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The griselda commutate the rahel. The griselda skyrocket the rahel. The griselda is frolicky. The griselda is twenty. The griselda skydive the rahel. The rahel skyrocket the griselda. The rahel is repand. If someone commutate the griselda and they visit the griselda then the griselda is frolicky. If someone commutate the rahel then they are athenian. If the griselda skyrocket the rahel then the rahel is not frolicky. If the griselda skyrocket the rahel and the griselda commutate the rahel then the rahel commutate the griselda. If the rahel is twenty then the rahel skyrocket the griselda. If someone is repand and ungusseted then they visit the griselda. If someone commutate the griselda then they chase the rahel. If the griselda skyrocket the rahel then the griselda commutate the rahel. The rahel does not chase the rahel.", "logic": "\nCommutate(griselda, rahel)\nSkyrocket(griselda, rahel)\nFrolicky(griselda)\nTwenty(griselda)\nSkydive(griselda, rahel)\nSkyrocket(rahel, griselda)\nRepand(rahel)\nforall x (Commutate(x, griselda) and Skydive(x, griselda) -> Frolicky(griselda))\nforall x (Commutate(x, rahel) -> Athenian(x))\nSkyrocket(griselda, rahel) -> not Frolicky(rahel)\nSkyrocket(griselda, rahel) and Commutate(griselda, rahel) -> Commutate(rahel, griselda)\nTwenty(rahel) -> Skyrocket(rahel, griselda)\nforall x (Repand(x) and Ungusseted(x) -> Skydive(x, griselda))\nforall x (Commutate(x, griselda) -> Commutate(x, rahel))\nSkyrocket(griselda, rahel) -> Commutate(griselda, rahel)\n\nnot Commutate(rahel, rahel)\n\nSkyrocket(griselda, rahel) and Commutate(griselda, rahel) and Skyrocket(griselda, rahel) and Commutate(griselda, rahel) -> Commutate(rahel, griselda) -> therefore Commutate(rahel, griselda) Commutate(rahel, griselda) and forall x (Commutate(x, griselda) -> Commutate(x, rahel)) -> therefore Commutate(rahel, rahel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The colette gamble the gertrud. The colette pass the gertrud. The colette is chilean. The colette is hardcover. The colette swosh the gertrud. The gertrud pass the colette. The gertrud is open. If someone gamble the colette and they visit the colette then the colette is chilean. If someone gamble the gertrud then they are disgusting. If the colette pass the gertrud then the gertrud is not chilean. If the colette pass the gertrud and the colette gamble the gertrud then the gertrud gamble the colette. If the gertrud is hardcover then the gertrud pass the colette. If someone is open and anosmic then they visit the colette. If someone gamble the colette then they chase the gertrud. If the colette pass the gertrud then the colette gamble the gertrud. The gertrud is disgusting.", "logic": "\nGamble(colette, gertrud)\nPass(colette, gertrud)\nChilean(colette)\nHardcover(colette)\nSwosh(colette, gertrud)\nPass(gertrud, colette)\nOpen(gertrud)\nforall x (Gamble(x, colette) and Swosh(x, colette) -> Chilean(colette))\nforall x (Gamble(x, gertrud) -> Disgusting(x))\nPass(colette, gertrud) -> not Chilean(gertrud)\nPass(colette, gertrud) and Gamble(colette, gertrud) -> Gamble(gertrud, colette)\nHardcover(gertrud) -> Pass(gertrud, colette)\nforall x (Open(x) and Anosmic(x) -> Swosh(x, colette))\nforall x (Gamble(x, colette) -> Gamble(x, gertrud))\nPass(colette, gertrud) -> Gamble(colette, gertrud)\n\nDisgusting(gertrud)\n\nPass(colette, gertrud) and Gamble(colette, gertrud) and Pass(colette, gertrud) and Gamble(colette, gertrud) -> Gamble(gertrud, colette) -> therefore Gamble(gertrud, colette) Gamble(gertrud, colette) and forall x (Gamble(x, colette) -> Gamble(x, gertrud)) -> therefore Gamble(gertrud, gertrud) Gamble(gertrud, gertrud) and forall x (Gamble(x, gertrud) -> Disgusting(x)) -> therefore Disgusting(gertrud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The rad pattern the odetta. The rad numb the odetta. The rad is writhing. The rad is mozartean. The rad block the odetta. The odetta numb the rad. The odetta is bewitched. If someone pattern the rad and they visit the rad then the rad is writhing. If someone pattern the odetta then they are backmost. If the rad numb the odetta then the odetta is not writhing. If the rad numb the odetta and the rad pattern the odetta then the odetta pattern the rad. If the odetta is mozartean then the odetta numb the rad. If someone is bewitched and peruked then they visit the rad. If someone pattern the rad then they chase the odetta. If the rad numb the odetta then the rad pattern the odetta. The odetta is not backmost.", "logic": "\nPattern(rad, odetta)\nNumb(rad, odetta)\nWrithing(rad)\nMozartean(rad)\nBlock(rad, odetta)\nNumb(odetta, rad)\nBewitched(odetta)\nforall x (Pattern(x, rad) and Block(x, rad) -> Writhing(rad))\nforall x (Pattern(x, odetta) -> Backmost(x))\nNumb(rad, odetta) -> not Writhing(odetta)\nNumb(rad, odetta) and Pattern(rad, odetta) -> Pattern(odetta, rad)\nMozartean(odetta) -> Numb(odetta, rad)\nforall x (Bewitched(x) and Peruked(x) -> Block(x, rad))\nforall x (Pattern(x, rad) -> Pattern(x, odetta))\nNumb(rad, odetta) -> Pattern(rad, odetta)\n\nnot Backmost(odetta)\n\nNumb(rad, odetta) and Pattern(rad, odetta) and Numb(rad, odetta) and Pattern(rad, odetta) -> Pattern(odetta, rad) -> therefore Pattern(odetta, rad) Pattern(odetta, rad) and forall x (Pattern(x, rad) -> Pattern(x, odetta)) -> therefore Pattern(odetta, odetta) Pattern(odetta, odetta) and forall x (Pattern(x, odetta) -> Backmost(x)) -> therefore Backmost(odetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The jackson reposition the tuck. The jackson belch the tuck. The jackson is countless. The jackson is theistic. The jackson race the tuck. The tuck belch the jackson. The tuck is rainy. If someone reposition the jackson and they visit the jackson then the jackson is countless. If someone reposition the tuck then they are boneless. If the jackson belch the tuck then the tuck is not countless. If the jackson belch the tuck and the jackson reposition the tuck then the tuck reposition the jackson. If the tuck is theistic then the tuck belch the jackson. If someone is rainy and engaged then they visit the jackson. If someone reposition the jackson then they chase the tuck. If the jackson belch the tuck then the jackson reposition the tuck. The jackson does not visit the jackson.", "logic": "\nReposition(jackson, tuck)\nBelch(jackson, tuck)\nCountless(jackson)\nTheistic(jackson)\nRace(jackson, tuck)\nBelch(tuck, jackson)\nRainy(tuck)\nforall x (Reposition(x, jackson) and Race(x, jackson) -> Countless(jackson))\nforall x (Reposition(x, tuck) -> Boneless(x))\nBelch(jackson, tuck) -> not Countless(tuck)\nBelch(jackson, tuck) and Reposition(jackson, tuck) -> Reposition(tuck, jackson)\nTheistic(tuck) -> Belch(tuck, jackson)\nforall x (Rainy(x) and Engaged(x) -> Race(x, jackson))\nforall x (Reposition(x, jackson) -> Reposition(x, tuck))\nBelch(jackson, tuck) -> Reposition(jackson, tuck)\n\nnot Race(jackson, jackson)\n\nforall x (Rainy(x) and Engaged(x) -> Race(x, jackson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The lowell bolt the dwight. The lowell shutter the dwight. The lowell is deformed. The lowell is direct. The lowell shower the dwight. The dwight shutter the lowell. The dwight is cometary. If someone bolt the lowell and they visit the lowell then the lowell is deformed. If someone bolt the dwight then they are reusable. If the lowell shutter the dwight then the dwight is not deformed. If the lowell shutter the dwight and the lowell bolt the dwight then the dwight bolt the lowell. If the dwight is direct then the dwight shutter the lowell. If someone is cometary and avowed then they visit the lowell. If someone bolt the lowell then they chase the dwight. If the lowell shutter the dwight then the lowell bolt the dwight. The dwight shower the lowell.", "logic": "\nBolt(lowell, dwight)\nShutter(lowell, dwight)\nDeformed(lowell)\nDirect(lowell)\nShower(lowell, dwight)\nShutter(dwight, lowell)\nCometary(dwight)\nforall x (Bolt(x, lowell) and Shower(x, lowell) -> Deformed(lowell))\nforall x (Bolt(x, dwight) -> Reusable(x))\nShutter(lowell, dwight) -> not Deformed(dwight)\nShutter(lowell, dwight) and Bolt(lowell, dwight) -> Bolt(dwight, lowell)\nDirect(dwight) -> Shutter(dwight, lowell)\nforall x (Cometary(x) and Avowed(x) -> Shower(x, lowell))\nforall x (Bolt(x, lowell) -> Bolt(x, dwight))\nShutter(lowell, dwight) -> Bolt(lowell, dwight)\n\nShower(dwight, lowell)\n\nforall x (Cometary(x) and Avowed(x) -> Shower(x, lowell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The merill disapprove the laryssa. The merill staunch the laryssa. The merill is buried. The merill is reasoning. The merill outflank the laryssa. The laryssa staunch the merill. The laryssa is andorran. If someone disapprove the merill and they visit the merill then the merill is buried. If someone disapprove the laryssa then they are stooped. If the merill staunch the laryssa then the laryssa is not buried. If the merill staunch the laryssa and the merill disapprove the laryssa then the laryssa disapprove the merill. If the laryssa is reasoning then the laryssa staunch the merill. If someone is andorran and fossil then they visit the merill. If someone disapprove the merill then they chase the laryssa. If the merill staunch the laryssa then the merill disapprove the laryssa. The laryssa is not fossil.", "logic": "\nDisapprove(merill, laryssa)\nStaunch(merill, laryssa)\nBuried(merill)\nReasoning(merill)\nOutflank(merill, laryssa)\nStaunch(laryssa, merill)\nAndorran(laryssa)\nforall x (Disapprove(x, merill) and Outflank(x, merill) -> Buried(merill))\nforall x (Disapprove(x, laryssa) -> Stooped(x))\nStaunch(merill, laryssa) -> not Buried(laryssa)\nStaunch(merill, laryssa) and Disapprove(merill, laryssa) -> Disapprove(laryssa, merill)\nReasoning(laryssa) -> Staunch(laryssa, merill)\nforall x (Andorran(x) and Fossil(x) -> Outflank(x, merill))\nforall x (Disapprove(x, merill) -> Disapprove(x, laryssa))\nStaunch(merill, laryssa) -> Disapprove(merill, laryssa)\n\nnot Fossil(laryssa)\n\nnot Fossil(laryssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The gail transpire the dorree. The gail fuse the dorree. The gail is unpaid. The gail is ototoxic. The gail satisfy the dorree. The dorree fuse the gail. The dorree is verminous. If someone transpire the gail and they visit the gail then the gail is unpaid. If someone transpire the dorree then they are geodetic. If the gail fuse the dorree then the dorree is not unpaid. If the gail fuse the dorree and the gail transpire the dorree then the dorree transpire the gail. If the dorree is ototoxic then the dorree fuse the gail. If someone is verminous and indolent then they visit the gail. If someone transpire the gail then they chase the dorree. If the gail fuse the dorree then the gail transpire the dorree. The dorree fuse the dorree.", "logic": "\nTranspire(gail, dorree)\nFuse(gail, dorree)\nUnpaid(gail)\nOtotoxic(gail)\nSatisfy(gail, dorree)\nFuse(dorree, gail)\nVerminous(dorree)\nforall x (Transpire(x, gail) and Satisfy(x, gail) -> Unpaid(gail))\nforall x (Transpire(x, dorree) -> Geodetic(x))\nFuse(gail, dorree) -> not Unpaid(dorree)\nFuse(gail, dorree) and Transpire(gail, dorree) -> Transpire(dorree, gail)\nOtotoxic(dorree) -> Fuse(dorree, gail)\nforall x (Verminous(x) and Indolent(x) -> Satisfy(x, gail))\nforall x (Transpire(x, gail) -> Transpire(x, dorree))\nFuse(gail, dorree) -> Transpire(gail, dorree)\n\nFuse(dorree, dorree)\n\nFuse(dorree, dorree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The thadeus hightail the nadya. The thadeus madden the nadya. The thadeus is crabbed. The thadeus is celestial. The thadeus overgorge the nadya. The nadya madden the thadeus. The nadya is igneous. If someone hightail the thadeus and they visit the thadeus then the thadeus is crabbed. If someone hightail the nadya then they are apocarpous. If the thadeus madden the nadya then the nadya is not crabbed. If the thadeus madden the nadya and the thadeus hightail the nadya then the nadya hightail the thadeus. If the nadya is celestial then the nadya madden the thadeus. If someone is igneous and vaginal then they visit the thadeus. If someone hightail the thadeus then they chase the nadya. If the thadeus madden the nadya then the thadeus hightail the nadya. The thadeus is not vaginal.", "logic": "\nHightail(thadeus, nadya)\nMadden(thadeus, nadya)\nCrabbed(thadeus)\nCelestial(thadeus)\nOvergorge(thadeus, nadya)\nMadden(nadya, thadeus)\nIgneous(nadya)\nforall x (Hightail(x, thadeus) and Overgorge(x, thadeus) -> Crabbed(thadeus))\nforall x (Hightail(x, nadya) -> Apocarpous(x))\nMadden(thadeus, nadya) -> not Crabbed(nadya)\nMadden(thadeus, nadya) and Hightail(thadeus, nadya) -> Hightail(nadya, thadeus)\nCelestial(nadya) -> Madden(nadya, thadeus)\nforall x (Igneous(x) and Vaginal(x) -> Overgorge(x, thadeus))\nforall x (Hightail(x, thadeus) -> Hightail(x, nadya))\nMadden(thadeus, nadya) -> Hightail(thadeus, nadya)\n\nnot Vaginal(thadeus)\n\nnot Vaginal(thadeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The aindrea despair the yevette. The aindrea outbrave the yevette. The aindrea is forbearing. The aindrea is seeping. The aindrea disembowel the yevette. The yevette outbrave the aindrea. The yevette is binate. If someone despair the aindrea and they visit the aindrea then the aindrea is forbearing. If someone despair the yevette then they are plenary. If the aindrea outbrave the yevette then the yevette is not forbearing. If the aindrea outbrave the yevette and the aindrea despair the yevette then the yevette despair the aindrea. If the yevette is seeping then the yevette outbrave the aindrea. If someone is binate and moot then they visit the aindrea. If someone despair the aindrea then they chase the yevette. If the aindrea outbrave the yevette then the aindrea despair the yevette. The yevette disembowel the yevette.", "logic": "\nDespair(aindrea, yevette)\nOutbrave(aindrea, yevette)\nForbearing(aindrea)\nSeeping(aindrea)\nDisembowel(aindrea, yevette)\nOutbrave(yevette, aindrea)\nBinate(yevette)\nforall x (Despair(x, aindrea) and Disembowel(x, aindrea) -> Forbearing(aindrea))\nforall x (Despair(x, yevette) -> Plenary(x))\nOutbrave(aindrea, yevette) -> not Forbearing(yevette)\nOutbrave(aindrea, yevette) and Despair(aindrea, yevette) -> Despair(yevette, aindrea)\nSeeping(yevette) -> Outbrave(yevette, aindrea)\nforall x (Binate(x) and Moot(x) -> Disembowel(x, aindrea))\nforall x (Despair(x, aindrea) -> Despair(x, yevette))\nOutbrave(aindrea, yevette) -> Despair(aindrea, yevette)\n\nDisembowel(yevette, yevette)\n\nDisembowel(yevette, yevette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The tiler foal the morena. The tiler colourize the morena. The tiler is nauruan. The tiler is bated. The tiler ancylose the morena. The morena colourize the tiler. The morena is organismic. If someone foal the tiler and they visit the tiler then the tiler is nauruan. If someone foal the morena then they are skew. If the tiler colourize the morena then the morena is not nauruan. If the tiler colourize the morena and the tiler foal the morena then the morena foal the tiler. If the morena is bated then the morena colourize the tiler. If someone is organismic and exterior then they visit the tiler. If someone foal the tiler then they chase the morena. If the tiler colourize the morena then the tiler foal the morena. The tiler does not eat the tiler.", "logic": "\nFoal(tiler, morena)\nColourize(tiler, morena)\nNauruan(tiler)\nBated(tiler)\nAncylose(tiler, morena)\nColourize(morena, tiler)\nOrganismic(morena)\nforall x (Foal(x, tiler) and Ancylose(x, tiler) -> Nauruan(tiler))\nforall x (Foal(x, morena) -> Skew(x))\nColourize(tiler, morena) -> not Nauruan(morena)\nColourize(tiler, morena) and Foal(tiler, morena) -> Foal(morena, tiler)\nBated(morena) -> Colourize(morena, tiler)\nforall x (Organismic(x) and Exterior(x) -> Ancylose(x, tiler))\nforall x (Foal(x, tiler) -> Foal(x, morena))\nColourize(tiler, morena) -> Foal(tiler, morena)\n\nnot Colourize(tiler, tiler)\n\nnot Colourize(tiler, tiler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The ikey occur the olwen. The ikey clean the olwen. The ikey is crossbred. The ikey is semitropic. The ikey flunk the olwen. The olwen clean the ikey. The olwen is reparable. If someone occur the ikey and they visit the ikey then the ikey is crossbred. If someone occur the olwen then they are twofold. If the ikey clean the olwen then the olwen is not crossbred. If the ikey clean the olwen and the ikey occur the olwen then the olwen occur the ikey. If the olwen is semitropic then the olwen clean the ikey. If someone is reparable and throwback then they visit the ikey. If someone occur the ikey then they chase the olwen. If the ikey clean the olwen then the ikey occur the olwen. The ikey occur the ikey.", "logic": "\nOccur(ikey, olwen)\nClean(ikey, olwen)\nCrossbred(ikey)\nSemitropic(ikey)\nFlunk(ikey, olwen)\nClean(olwen, ikey)\nReparable(olwen)\nforall x (Occur(x, ikey) and Flunk(x, ikey) -> Crossbred(ikey))\nforall x (Occur(x, olwen) -> Twofold(x))\nClean(ikey, olwen) -> not Crossbred(olwen)\nClean(ikey, olwen) and Occur(ikey, olwen) -> Occur(olwen, ikey)\nSemitropic(olwen) -> Clean(olwen, ikey)\nforall x (Reparable(x) and Throwback(x) -> Flunk(x, ikey))\nforall x (Occur(x, ikey) -> Occur(x, olwen))\nClean(ikey, olwen) -> Occur(ikey, olwen)\n\nOccur(ikey, ikey)\n\nOccur(ikey, ikey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "Mortie is yellowish. All mystical, apian things are not occlusive. All yellowish things are occlusive. All occlusive, mystical things are not hipped. If something is occlusive then it is not apian. If Mortie is apian then Mortie is not unsold. If Mortie is not apian then Mortie is hipped. If something is occlusive and yellowish then it is not carroty. If something is unsold and not hipped then it is carroty. Mortie is yellowish.", "logic": "\nYellowish(mortie)\nforall x (Mystical(x) and Apian(x) -> not Occlusive(x))\nforall x (Yellowish(x) -> Occlusive(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Mystical(x) -> not Hipped(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) -> not Apian(x))\nApian(mortie) -> not Unsold(mortie)\nnot Apian(mortie) -> Hipped(mortie)\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Yellowish(x) -> not Carroty(x))\nforall x (Unsold(x) and not Hipped(x) -> Carroty(x))\n\nYellowish(mortie)\n\ntherefore Yellowish(mortie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Courtney is teachable. All angelical, awestruck things are not boughless. All teachable things are boughless. All boughless, angelical things are not enumerable. If something is boughless then it is not awestruck. If Courtney is awestruck then Courtney is not concerned. If Courtney is not awestruck then Courtney is enumerable. If something is boughless and teachable then it is not unguided. If something is concerned and not enumerable then it is unguided. Courtney is not teachable.", "logic": "\nTeachable(courtney)\nforall x (Angelical(x) and Awestruck(x) -> not Boughless(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) -> Boughless(x))\nforall x (Boughless(x) and Angelical(x) -> not Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Boughless(x) -> not Awestruck(x))\nAwestruck(courtney) -> not Concerned(courtney)\nnot Awestruck(courtney) -> Enumerable(courtney)\nforall x (Boughless(x) and Teachable(x) -> not Unguided(x))\nforall x (Concerned(x) and not Enumerable(x) -> Unguided(x))\n\nnot Teachable(courtney)\n\ntherefore Teachable(courtney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Lissa is calceolate. All psychotic, demanding things are not maniclike. All calceolate things are maniclike. All maniclike, psychotic things are not scaled. If something is maniclike then it is not demanding. If Lissa is demanding then Lissa is not bothersome. If Lissa is not demanding then Lissa is scaled. If something is maniclike and calceolate then it is not blunt. If something is bothersome and not scaled then it is blunt. Lissa is maniclike.", "logic": "\nCalceolate(lissa)\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and Demanding(x) -> not Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Maniclike(x) and Psychotic(x) -> not Scaled(x))\nforall x (Maniclike(x) -> not Demanding(x))\nDemanding(lissa) -> not Bothersome(lissa)\nnot Demanding(lissa) -> Scaled(lissa)\nforall x (Maniclike(x) and Calceolate(x) -> not Blunt(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) and not Scaled(x) -> Blunt(x))\n\nManiclike(lissa)\n\nCalceolate(lissa) and forall x (Calceolate(x) -> Maniclike(x)) -> therefore Maniclike(lissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Kimmy is orangish. All unmanned, declared things are not semiarid. All orangish things are semiarid. All semiarid, unmanned things are not cataleptic. If something is semiarid then it is not declared. If Kimmy is declared then Kimmy is not tactical. If Kimmy is not declared then Kimmy is cataleptic. If something is semiarid and orangish then it is not analyzable. If something is tactical and not cataleptic then it is analyzable. Kimmy is not semiarid.", "logic": "\nOrangish(kimmy)\nforall x (Unmanned(x) and Declared(x) -> not Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) and Unmanned(x) -> not Cataleptic(x))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) -> not Declared(x))\nDeclared(kimmy) -> not Tactical(kimmy)\nnot Declared(kimmy) -> Cataleptic(kimmy)\nforall x (Semiarid(x) and Orangish(x) -> not Analyzable(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) and not Cataleptic(x) -> Analyzable(x))\n\nnot Semiarid(kimmy)\n\nOrangish(kimmy) and forall x (Orangish(x) -> Semiarid(x)) -> therefore Semiarid(kimmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Hannibal is unannealed. All thinned, taking things are not occidental. All unannealed things are occidental. All occidental, thinned things are not precooled. If something is occidental then it is not taking. If Hannibal is taking then Hannibal is not nonmodern. If Hannibal is not taking then Hannibal is precooled. If something is occidental and unannealed then it is not licit. If something is nonmodern and not precooled then it is licit. Hannibal is not licit.", "logic": "\nUnannealed(hannibal)\nforall x (Thinned(x) and Taking(x) -> not Occidental(x))\nforall x (Unannealed(x) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Occidental(x) and Thinned(x) -> not Precooled(x))\nforall x (Occidental(x) -> not Taking(x))\nTaking(hannibal) -> not Nonmodern(hannibal)\nnot Taking(hannibal) -> Precooled(hannibal)\nforall x (Occidental(x) and Unannealed(x) -> not Licit(x))\nforall x (Nonmodern(x) and not Precooled(x) -> Licit(x))\n\nnot Licit(hannibal)\n\nUnannealed(hannibal) and forall x (Unannealed(x) -> Occidental(x)) -> therefore Occidental(hannibal) Occidental(hannibal) and Unannealed(hannibal) and forall x (Occidental(x) and Unannealed(x) -> not Licit(x)) -> therefore not Licit(hannibal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Alicea is eminent. All blinking, egocentric things are not congruous. All eminent things are congruous. All congruous, blinking things are not overall. If something is congruous then it is not egocentric. If Alicea is egocentric then Alicea is not alpine. If Alicea is not egocentric then Alicea is overall. If something is congruous and eminent then it is not accursed. If something is alpine and not overall then it is accursed. Alicea is egocentric.", "logic": "\nEminent(alicea)\nforall x (Blinking(x) and Egocentric(x) -> not Congruous(x))\nforall x (Eminent(x) -> Congruous(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) and Blinking(x) -> not Overall(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) -> not Egocentric(x))\nEgocentric(alicea) -> not Alpine(alicea)\nnot Egocentric(alicea) -> Overall(alicea)\nforall x (Congruous(x) and Eminent(x) -> not Accursed(x))\nforall x (Alpine(x) and not Overall(x) -> Accursed(x))\n\nEgocentric(alicea)\n\nEminent(alicea) and forall x (Eminent(x) -> Congruous(x)) -> therefore Congruous(alicea) Congruous(alicea) and forall x (Congruous(x) -> not Egocentric(x)) -> therefore not Egocentric(alicea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Emelita is mutagenic. All innovative, worried things are not ambagious. All mutagenic things are ambagious. All ambagious, innovative things are not erring. If something is ambagious then it is not worried. If Emelita is worried then Emelita is not nonnomadic. If Emelita is not worried then Emelita is erring. If something is ambagious and mutagenic then it is not schmalzy. If something is nonnomadic and not erring then it is schmalzy. Emelita is erring.", "logic": "\nMutagenic(emelita)\nforall x (Innovative(x) and Worried(x) -> not Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) and Innovative(x) -> not Erring(x))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) -> not Worried(x))\nWorried(emelita) -> not Nonnomadic(emelita)\nnot Worried(emelita) -> Erring(emelita)\nforall x (Ambagious(x) and Mutagenic(x) -> not Schmalzy(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) and not Erring(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\n\nErring(emelita)\n\nMutagenic(emelita) and forall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Ambagious(x)) -> therefore Ambagious(emelita) Ambagious(emelita) and forall x (Ambagious(x) -> not Worried(x)) -> therefore not Worried(emelita) not Worried(emelita) and not Worried(emelita) -> Erring(emelita) -> therefore Erring(emelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Junie is cruciform. All shimmery, unalarming things are not shuddery. All cruciform things are shuddery. All shuddery, shimmery things are not thundery. If something is shuddery then it is not unalarming. If Junie is unalarming then Junie is not encased. If Junie is not unalarming then Junie is thundery. If something is shuddery and cruciform then it is not unprepared. If something is encased and not thundery then it is unprepared. Junie is not thundery.", "logic": "\nCruciform(junie)\nforall x (Shimmery(x) and Unalarming(x) -> not Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Cruciform(x) -> Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Shuddery(x) and Shimmery(x) -> not Thundery(x))\nforall x (Shuddery(x) -> not Unalarming(x))\nUnalarming(junie) -> not Encased(junie)\nnot Unalarming(junie) -> Thundery(junie)\nforall x (Shuddery(x) and Cruciform(x) -> not Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) and not Thundery(x) -> Unprepared(x))\n\nnot Thundery(junie)\n\nCruciform(junie) and forall x (Cruciform(x) -> Shuddery(x)) -> therefore Shuddery(junie) Shuddery(junie) and forall x (Shuddery(x) -> not Unalarming(x)) -> therefore not Unalarming(junie) not Unalarming(junie) and not Unalarming(junie) -> Thundery(junie) -> therefore Thundery(junie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Elisha is divisible. All opulent, statewide things are not cockamamie. All divisible things are cockamamie. All cockamamie, opulent things are not drunken. If something is cockamamie then it is not statewide. If Elisha is statewide then Elisha is not whiplike. If Elisha is not statewide then Elisha is drunken. If something is cockamamie and divisible then it is not dulled. If something is whiplike and not drunken then it is dulled. Elisha is not whiplike.", "logic": "\nDivisible(elisha)\nforall x (Opulent(x) and Statewide(x) -> not Cockamamie(x))\nforall x (Divisible(x) -> Cockamamie(x))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) and Opulent(x) -> not Drunken(x))\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) -> not Statewide(x))\nStatewide(elisha) -> not Whiplike(elisha)\nnot Statewide(elisha) -> Drunken(elisha)\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) and Divisible(x) -> not Dulled(x))\nforall x (Whiplike(x) and not Drunken(x) -> Dulled(x))\n\nnot Whiplike(elisha)\n\nnot Whiplike(elisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Heda is allergic. All apelike, orbital things are not edifying. All allergic things are edifying. All edifying, apelike things are not refreshed. If something is edifying then it is not orbital. If Heda is orbital then Heda is not baccate. If Heda is not orbital then Heda is refreshed. If something is edifying and allergic then it is not greensick. If something is baccate and not refreshed then it is greensick. Heda is apelike.", "logic": "\nAllergic(heda)\nforall x (Apelike(x) and Orbital(x) -> not Edifying(x))\nforall x (Allergic(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) and Apelike(x) -> not Refreshed(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) -> not Orbital(x))\nOrbital(heda) -> not Baccate(heda)\nnot Orbital(heda) -> Refreshed(heda)\nforall x (Edifying(x) and Allergic(x) -> not Greensick(x))\nforall x (Baccate(x) and not Refreshed(x) -> Greensick(x))\n\nApelike(heda)\n\nApelike(heda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "The olle burgeon the jakob. The olle is bifurcated. The olle befall the jakob. The olle delay the godfree. The jakob burgeon the eulalie. The jakob burgeon the godfree. The jakob is not unswayed. The jakob delay the olle. The jakob delay the godfree. The eulalie befall the jakob. The godfree burgeon the jakob. The godfree is bifurcated. The godfree is anorexic. The godfree is not autotypic. The godfree befall the eulalie. The godfree delay the jakob. If someone burgeon the jakob then the jakob befall the eulalie. If someone befall the olle then the olle is autotypic. If someone befall the jakob then they are unfinished. If someone is anorexic then they like the olle. If someone is autotypic then they like the eulalie. If the olle is not autotypic and the olle does not eat the godfree then the olle is not unfinished. The eulalie befall the jakob.", "logic": "\nBurgeon(olle, jakob)\nBifurcated(olle)\nBefall(olle, jakob)\nDelay(olle, godfree)\nBurgeon(jakob, eulalie)\nBurgeon(jakob, godfree)\nnot Unswayed(jakob)\nDelay(jakob, olle)\nDelay(jakob, godfree)\nBefall(eulalie, jakob)\nBurgeon(godfree, jakob)\nBifurcated(godfree)\nAnorexic(godfree)\nnot Autotypic(godfree)\nBefall(godfree, eulalie)\nDelay(godfree, jakob)\nforall x (Burgeon(x, jakob) -> Befall(jakob, eulalie))\nforall x (Befall(x, olle) -> Autotypic(olle))\nforall x (Befall(x, jakob) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Anorexic(x) -> Befall(x, olle))\nforall x (Autotypic(x) -> Befall(x, eulalie))\nnot Autotypic(olle) and not Burgeon(olle, godfree) -> not Unfinished(olle)\n\nBefall(eulalie, jakob)\n\ntherefore Befall(eulalie, jakob)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The lennie complect the myra. The lennie is phonetic. The lennie boot the myra. The lennie calcimine the oswald. The myra complect the reeva. The myra complect the oswald. The myra is not original. The myra calcimine the lennie. The myra calcimine the oswald. The reeva boot the myra. The oswald complect the myra. The oswald is phonetic. The oswald is dicey. The oswald is not sappy. The oswald boot the reeva. The oswald calcimine the myra. If someone complect the myra then the myra boot the reeva. If someone boot the lennie then the lennie is sappy. If someone boot the myra then they are overnight. If someone is dicey then they like the lennie. If someone is sappy then they like the reeva. If the lennie is not sappy and the lennie does not eat the oswald then the lennie is not overnight. The oswald is not phonetic.", "logic": "\nComplect(lennie, myra)\nPhonetic(lennie)\nBoot(lennie, myra)\nCalcimine(lennie, oswald)\nComplect(myra, reeva)\nComplect(myra, oswald)\nnot Original(myra)\nCalcimine(myra, lennie)\nCalcimine(myra, oswald)\nBoot(reeva, myra)\nComplect(oswald, myra)\nPhonetic(oswald)\nDicey(oswald)\nnot Sappy(oswald)\nBoot(oswald, reeva)\nCalcimine(oswald, myra)\nforall x (Complect(x, myra) -> Boot(myra, reeva))\nforall x (Boot(x, lennie) -> Sappy(lennie))\nforall x (Boot(x, myra) -> Overnight(x))\nforall x (Dicey(x) -> Boot(x, lennie))\nforall x (Sappy(x) -> Boot(x, reeva))\nnot Sappy(lennie) and not Complect(lennie, oswald) -> not Overnight(lennie)\n\nnot Phonetic(oswald)\n\ntherefore Phonetic(oswald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The darrel apostatize the dominick. The darrel is tacky. The darrel mound the dominick. The darrel trundle the tomi. The dominick apostatize the arron. The dominick apostatize the tomi. The dominick is not lined. The dominick trundle the darrel. The dominick trundle the tomi. The arron mound the dominick. The tomi apostatize the dominick. The tomi is tacky. The tomi is resistive. The tomi is not fuddled. The tomi mound the arron. The tomi trundle the dominick. If someone apostatize the dominick then the dominick mound the arron. If someone mound the darrel then the darrel is fuddled. If someone mound the dominick then they are bankable. If someone is resistive then they like the darrel. If someone is fuddled then they like the arron. If the darrel is not fuddled and the darrel does not eat the tomi then the darrel is not bankable. The darrel is bankable.", "logic": "\nApostatize(darrel, dominick)\nTacky(darrel)\nMound(darrel, dominick)\nTrundle(darrel, tomi)\nApostatize(dominick, arron)\nApostatize(dominick, tomi)\nnot Lined(dominick)\nTrundle(dominick, darrel)\nTrundle(dominick, tomi)\nMound(arron, dominick)\nApostatize(tomi, dominick)\nTacky(tomi)\nResistive(tomi)\nnot Fuddled(tomi)\nMound(tomi, arron)\nTrundle(tomi, dominick)\nforall x (Apostatize(x, dominick) -> Mound(dominick, arron))\nforall x (Mound(x, darrel) -> Fuddled(darrel))\nforall x (Mound(x, dominick) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Resistive(x) -> Mound(x, darrel))\nforall x (Fuddled(x) -> Mound(x, arron))\nnot Fuddled(darrel) and not Apostatize(darrel, tomi) -> not Bankable(darrel)\n\nBankable(darrel)\n\nMound(darrel, dominick) and forall x (Mound(x, dominick) -> Bankable(x)) -> therefore Bankable(darrel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The gifford demise the erl. The gifford is wireless. The gifford mortise the erl. The gifford toss the marget. The erl demise the bell. The erl demise the marget. The erl is not chewable. The erl toss the gifford. The erl toss the marget. The bell mortise the erl. The marget demise the erl. The marget is wireless. The marget is flowerless. The marget is not epicyclic. The marget mortise the bell. The marget toss the erl. If someone demise the erl then the erl mortise the bell. If someone mortise the gifford then the gifford is epicyclic. If someone mortise the erl then they are surprising. If someone is flowerless then they like the gifford. If someone is epicyclic then they like the bell. If the gifford is not epicyclic and the gifford does not eat the marget then the gifford is not surprising. The bell is not surprising.", "logic": "\nDemise(gifford, erl)\nWireless(gifford)\nMortise(gifford, erl)\nToss(gifford, marget)\nDemise(erl, bell)\nDemise(erl, marget)\nnot Chewable(erl)\nToss(erl, gifford)\nToss(erl, marget)\nMortise(bell, erl)\nDemise(marget, erl)\nWireless(marget)\nFlowerless(marget)\nnot Epicyclic(marget)\nMortise(marget, bell)\nToss(marget, erl)\nforall x (Demise(x, erl) -> Mortise(erl, bell))\nforall x (Mortise(x, gifford) -> Epicyclic(gifford))\nforall x (Mortise(x, erl) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) -> Mortise(x, gifford))\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) -> Mortise(x, bell))\nnot Epicyclic(gifford) and not Demise(gifford, marget) -> not Surprising(gifford)\n\nnot Surprising(bell)\n\nMortise(bell, erl) and forall x (Mortise(x, erl) -> Surprising(x)) -> therefore Surprising(bell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The nova adolesce the dolora. The nova is chian. The nova gild the dolora. The nova conk the renell. The dolora adolesce the verena. The dolora adolesce the renell. The dolora is not indisposed. The dolora conk the nova. The dolora conk the renell. The verena gild the dolora. The renell adolesce the dolora. The renell is chian. The renell is hidden. The renell is not pugilistic. The renell gild the verena. The renell conk the dolora. If someone adolesce the dolora then the dolora gild the verena. If someone gild the nova then the nova is pugilistic. If someone gild the dolora then they are monosemous. If someone is hidden then they like the nova. If someone is pugilistic then they like the verena. If the nova is not pugilistic and the nova does not eat the renell then the nova is not monosemous. The nova is pugilistic.", "logic": "\nAdolesce(nova, dolora)\nChian(nova)\nGild(nova, dolora)\nConk(nova, renell)\nAdolesce(dolora, verena)\nAdolesce(dolora, renell)\nnot Indisposed(dolora)\nConk(dolora, nova)\nConk(dolora, renell)\nGild(verena, dolora)\nAdolesce(renell, dolora)\nChian(renell)\nHidden(renell)\nnot Pugilistic(renell)\nGild(renell, verena)\nConk(renell, dolora)\nforall x (Adolesce(x, dolora) -> Gild(dolora, verena))\nforall x (Gild(x, nova) -> Pugilistic(nova))\nforall x (Gild(x, dolora) -> Monosemous(x))\nforall x (Hidden(x) -> Gild(x, nova))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Gild(x, verena))\nnot Pugilistic(nova) and not Adolesce(nova, renell) -> not Monosemous(nova)\n\nPugilistic(nova)\n\nHidden(renell) and forall x (Hidden(x) -> Gild(x, nova)) -> therefore Gild(renell, nova) Gild(renell, nova) and forall x (Gild(x, nova) -> Pugilistic(nova)) -> therefore Pugilistic(nova)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The jodi legitimise the chaim. The jodi is immotile. The jodi brad the chaim. The jodi extract the sayre. The chaim legitimise the faunie. The chaim legitimise the sayre. The chaim is not mammoth. The chaim extract the jodi. The chaim extract the sayre. The faunie brad the chaim. The sayre legitimise the chaim. The sayre is immotile. The sayre is about. The sayre is not somnific. The sayre brad the faunie. The sayre extract the chaim. If someone legitimise the chaim then the chaim brad the faunie. If someone brad the jodi then the jodi is somnific. If someone brad the chaim then they are olfactory. If someone is about then they like the jodi. If someone is somnific then they like the faunie. If the jodi is not somnific and the jodi does not eat the sayre then the jodi is not olfactory. The jodi is not somnific.", "logic": "\nLegitimise(jodi, chaim)\nImmotile(jodi)\nBrad(jodi, chaim)\nExtract(jodi, sayre)\nLegitimise(chaim, faunie)\nLegitimise(chaim, sayre)\nnot Mammoth(chaim)\nExtract(chaim, jodi)\nExtract(chaim, sayre)\nBrad(faunie, chaim)\nLegitimise(sayre, chaim)\nImmotile(sayre)\nAbout(sayre)\nnot Somnific(sayre)\nBrad(sayre, faunie)\nExtract(sayre, chaim)\nforall x (Legitimise(x, chaim) -> Brad(chaim, faunie))\nforall x (Brad(x, jodi) -> Somnific(jodi))\nforall x (Brad(x, chaim) -> Olfactory(x))\nforall x (About(x) -> Brad(x, jodi))\nforall x (Somnific(x) -> Brad(x, faunie))\nnot Somnific(jodi) and not Legitimise(jodi, sayre) -> not Olfactory(jodi)\n\nnot Somnific(jodi)\n\nAbout(sayre) and forall x (About(x) -> Brad(x, jodi)) -> therefore Brad(sayre, jodi) Brad(sayre, jodi) and forall x (Brad(x, jodi) -> Somnific(jodi)) -> therefore Somnific(jodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The mufinella patent the esmaria. The mufinella is bicameral. The mufinella noise the esmaria. The mufinella rejuvenate the meg. The esmaria patent the randa. The esmaria patent the meg. The esmaria is not defensive. The esmaria rejuvenate the mufinella. The esmaria rejuvenate the meg. The randa noise the esmaria. The meg patent the esmaria. The meg is bicameral. The meg is lowering. The meg is not unrelaxed. The meg noise the randa. The meg rejuvenate the esmaria. If someone patent the esmaria then the esmaria noise the randa. If someone noise the mufinella then the mufinella is unrelaxed. If someone noise the esmaria then they are galactic. If someone is lowering then they like the mufinella. If someone is unrelaxed then they like the randa. If the mufinella is not unrelaxed and the mufinella does not eat the meg then the mufinella is not galactic. The mufinella noise the randa.", "logic": "\nPatent(mufinella, esmaria)\nBicameral(mufinella)\nNoise(mufinella, esmaria)\nRejuvenate(mufinella, meg)\nPatent(esmaria, randa)\nPatent(esmaria, meg)\nnot Defensive(esmaria)\nRejuvenate(esmaria, mufinella)\nRejuvenate(esmaria, meg)\nNoise(randa, esmaria)\nPatent(meg, esmaria)\nBicameral(meg)\nLowering(meg)\nnot Unrelaxed(meg)\nNoise(meg, randa)\nRejuvenate(meg, esmaria)\nforall x (Patent(x, esmaria) -> Noise(esmaria, randa))\nforall x (Noise(x, mufinella) -> Unrelaxed(mufinella))\nforall x (Noise(x, esmaria) -> Galactic(x))\nforall x (Lowering(x) -> Noise(x, mufinella))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) -> Noise(x, randa))\nnot Unrelaxed(mufinella) and not Patent(mufinella, meg) -> not Galactic(mufinella)\n\nNoise(mufinella, randa)\n\nLowering(meg) and forall x (Lowering(x) -> Noise(x, mufinella)) -> therefore Noise(meg, mufinella) Noise(meg, mufinella) and forall x (Noise(x, mufinella) -> Unrelaxed(mufinella)) -> therefore Unrelaxed(mufinella) Unrelaxed(mufinella) and forall x (Unrelaxed(x) -> Noise(x, randa)) -> therefore Noise(mufinella, randa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The amandie augur the anais. The amandie is uninviting. The amandie troop the anais. The amandie calibrate the yale. The anais augur the arlena. The anais augur the yale. The anais is not cheliceral. The anais calibrate the amandie. The anais calibrate the yale. The arlena troop the anais. The yale augur the anais. The yale is uninviting. The yale is unpackaged. The yale is not pandemic. The yale troop the arlena. The yale calibrate the anais. If someone augur the anais then the anais troop the arlena. If someone troop the amandie then the amandie is pandemic. If someone troop the anais then they are stunned. If someone is unpackaged then they like the amandie. If someone is pandemic then they like the arlena. If the amandie is not pandemic and the amandie does not eat the yale then the amandie is not stunned. The amandie does not like the arlena.", "logic": "\nAugur(amandie, anais)\nUninviting(amandie)\nTroop(amandie, anais)\nCalibrate(amandie, yale)\nAugur(anais, arlena)\nAugur(anais, yale)\nnot Cheliceral(anais)\nCalibrate(anais, amandie)\nCalibrate(anais, yale)\nTroop(arlena, anais)\nAugur(yale, anais)\nUninviting(yale)\nUnpackaged(yale)\nnot Pandemic(yale)\nTroop(yale, arlena)\nCalibrate(yale, anais)\nforall x (Augur(x, anais) -> Troop(anais, arlena))\nforall x (Troop(x, amandie) -> Pandemic(amandie))\nforall x (Troop(x, anais) -> Stunned(x))\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Troop(x, amandie))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) -> Troop(x, arlena))\nnot Pandemic(amandie) and not Augur(amandie, yale) -> not Stunned(amandie)\n\nnot Troop(amandie, arlena)\n\nUnpackaged(yale) and forall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Troop(x, amandie)) -> therefore Troop(yale, amandie) Troop(yale, amandie) and forall x (Troop(x, amandie) -> Pandemic(amandie)) -> therefore Pandemic(amandie) Pandemic(amandie) and forall x (Pandemic(x) -> Troop(x, arlena)) -> therefore Troop(amandie, arlena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The georgetta puncture the stacia. The georgetta is nervous. The georgetta compete the stacia. The georgetta lift the sayre. The stacia puncture the gretna. The stacia puncture the sayre. The stacia is not hesitant. The stacia lift the georgetta. The stacia lift the sayre. The gretna compete the stacia. The sayre puncture the stacia. The sayre is nervous. The sayre is fuzzed. The sayre is not shrunken. The sayre compete the gretna. The sayre lift the stacia. If someone puncture the stacia then the stacia compete the gretna. If someone compete the georgetta then the georgetta is shrunken. If someone compete the stacia then they are plump. If someone is fuzzed then they like the georgetta. If someone is shrunken then they like the gretna. If the georgetta is not shrunken and the georgetta does not eat the sayre then the georgetta is not plump. The stacia does not like the georgetta.", "logic": "\nPuncture(georgetta, stacia)\nNervous(georgetta)\nCompete(georgetta, stacia)\nLift(georgetta, sayre)\nPuncture(stacia, gretna)\nPuncture(stacia, sayre)\nnot Hesitant(stacia)\nLift(stacia, georgetta)\nLift(stacia, sayre)\nCompete(gretna, stacia)\nPuncture(sayre, stacia)\nNervous(sayre)\nFuzzed(sayre)\nnot Shrunken(sayre)\nCompete(sayre, gretna)\nLift(sayre, stacia)\nforall x (Puncture(x, stacia) -> Compete(stacia, gretna))\nforall x (Compete(x, georgetta) -> Shrunken(georgetta))\nforall x (Compete(x, stacia) -> Plump(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Compete(x, georgetta))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) -> Compete(x, gretna))\nnot Shrunken(georgetta) and not Puncture(georgetta, sayre) -> not Plump(georgetta)\n\nnot Compete(stacia, georgetta)\n\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Compete(x, georgetta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The rebecca convict the anatollo. The rebecca is colloidal. The rebecca unknot the anatollo. The rebecca delimit the madeleine. The anatollo convict the sibyl. The anatollo convict the madeleine. The anatollo is not subtle. The anatollo delimit the rebecca. The anatollo delimit the madeleine. The sibyl unknot the anatollo. The madeleine convict the anatollo. The madeleine is colloidal. The madeleine is foldaway. The madeleine is not anatomic. The madeleine unknot the sibyl. The madeleine delimit the anatollo. If someone convict the anatollo then the anatollo unknot the sibyl. If someone unknot the rebecca then the rebecca is anatomic. If someone unknot the anatollo then they are initiatory. If someone is foldaway then they like the rebecca. If someone is anatomic then they like the sibyl. If the rebecca is not anatomic and the rebecca does not eat the madeleine then the rebecca is not initiatory. The sibyl unknot the sibyl.", "logic": "\nConvict(rebecca, anatollo)\nColloidal(rebecca)\nUnknot(rebecca, anatollo)\nDelimit(rebecca, madeleine)\nConvict(anatollo, sibyl)\nConvict(anatollo, madeleine)\nnot Subtle(anatollo)\nDelimit(anatollo, rebecca)\nDelimit(anatollo, madeleine)\nUnknot(sibyl, anatollo)\nConvict(madeleine, anatollo)\nColloidal(madeleine)\nFoldaway(madeleine)\nnot Anatomic(madeleine)\nUnknot(madeleine, sibyl)\nDelimit(madeleine, anatollo)\nforall x (Convict(x, anatollo) -> Unknot(anatollo, sibyl))\nforall x (Unknot(x, rebecca) -> Anatomic(rebecca))\nforall x (Unknot(x, anatollo) -> Initiatory(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Unknot(x, rebecca))\nforall x (Anatomic(x) -> Unknot(x, sibyl))\nnot Anatomic(rebecca) and not Convict(rebecca, madeleine) -> not Initiatory(rebecca)\n\nUnknot(sibyl, sibyl)\n\nforall x (Anatomic(x) -> Unknot(x, sibyl)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The sherill colly the halley. The sherill is astonied. The sherill prosper the halley. The sherill guggle the kelvin. The halley colly the janaye. The halley colly the kelvin. The halley is not halting. The halley guggle the sherill. The halley guggle the kelvin. The janaye prosper the halley. The kelvin colly the halley. The kelvin is astonied. The kelvin is diseased. The kelvin is not babyish. The kelvin prosper the janaye. The kelvin guggle the halley. If someone colly the halley then the halley prosper the janaye. If someone prosper the sherill then the sherill is babyish. If someone prosper the halley then they are coated. If someone is diseased then they like the sherill. If someone is babyish then they like the janaye. If the sherill is not babyish and the sherill does not eat the kelvin then the sherill is not coated. The janaye does not like the sherill.", "logic": "\nColly(sherill, halley)\nAstonied(sherill)\nProsper(sherill, halley)\nGuggle(sherill, kelvin)\nColly(halley, janaye)\nColly(halley, kelvin)\nnot Halting(halley)\nGuggle(halley, sherill)\nGuggle(halley, kelvin)\nProsper(janaye, halley)\nColly(kelvin, halley)\nAstonied(kelvin)\nDiseased(kelvin)\nnot Babyish(kelvin)\nProsper(kelvin, janaye)\nGuggle(kelvin, halley)\nforall x (Colly(x, halley) -> Prosper(halley, janaye))\nforall x (Prosper(x, sherill) -> Babyish(sherill))\nforall x (Prosper(x, halley) -> Coated(x))\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> Prosper(x, sherill))\nforall x (Babyish(x) -> Prosper(x, janaye))\nnot Babyish(sherill) and not Colly(sherill, kelvin) -> not Coated(sherill)\n\nnot Prosper(janaye, sherill)\n\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> Prosper(x, sherill)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The aziz feast the malvina. The aziz is haptic. The aziz miscreate the malvina. The aziz crick the haleigh. The malvina feast the hill. The malvina feast the haleigh. The malvina is not utilised. The malvina crick the aziz. The malvina crick the haleigh. The hill miscreate the malvina. The haleigh feast the malvina. The haleigh is haptic. The haleigh is fervid. The haleigh is not starchless. The haleigh miscreate the hill. The haleigh crick the malvina. If someone feast the malvina then the malvina miscreate the hill. If someone miscreate the aziz then the aziz is starchless. If someone miscreate the malvina then they are bodied. If someone is fervid then they like the aziz. If someone is starchless then they like the hill. If the aziz is not starchless and the aziz does not eat the haleigh then the aziz is not bodied. The haleigh is bodied.", "logic": "\nFeast(aziz, malvina)\nHaptic(aziz)\nMiscreate(aziz, malvina)\nCrick(aziz, haleigh)\nFeast(malvina, hill)\nFeast(malvina, haleigh)\nnot Utilised(malvina)\nCrick(malvina, aziz)\nCrick(malvina, haleigh)\nMiscreate(hill, malvina)\nFeast(haleigh, malvina)\nHaptic(haleigh)\nFervid(haleigh)\nnot Starchless(haleigh)\nMiscreate(haleigh, hill)\nCrick(haleigh, malvina)\nforall x (Feast(x, malvina) -> Miscreate(malvina, hill))\nforall x (Miscreate(x, aziz) -> Starchless(aziz))\nforall x (Miscreate(x, malvina) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Fervid(x) -> Miscreate(x, aziz))\nforall x (Starchless(x) -> Miscreate(x, hill))\nnot Starchless(aziz) and not Feast(aziz, haleigh) -> not Bodied(aziz)\n\nBodied(haleigh)\n\nforall x (Miscreate(x, malvina) -> Bodied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The xavier embed the rafe. The xavier is heroic. The xavier fool the rafe. The xavier novelise the maryellen. The rafe embed the andreas. The rafe embed the maryellen. The rafe is not alcoholic. The rafe novelise the xavier. The rafe novelise the maryellen. The andreas fool the rafe. The maryellen embed the rafe. The maryellen is heroic. The maryellen is pondering. The maryellen is not skillful. The maryellen fool the andreas. The maryellen novelise the rafe. If someone embed the rafe then the rafe fool the andreas. If someone fool the xavier then the xavier is skillful. If someone fool the rafe then they are bowelless. If someone is pondering then they like the xavier. If someone is skillful then they like the andreas. If the xavier is not skillful and the xavier does not eat the maryellen then the xavier is not bowelless. The xavier does not eat the xavier.", "logic": "\nEmbed(xavier, rafe)\nHeroic(xavier)\nFool(xavier, rafe)\nNovelise(xavier, maryellen)\nEmbed(rafe, andreas)\nEmbed(rafe, maryellen)\nnot Alcoholic(rafe)\nNovelise(rafe, xavier)\nNovelise(rafe, maryellen)\nFool(andreas, rafe)\nEmbed(maryellen, rafe)\nHeroic(maryellen)\nPondering(maryellen)\nnot Skillful(maryellen)\nFool(maryellen, andreas)\nNovelise(maryellen, rafe)\nforall x (Embed(x, rafe) -> Fool(rafe, andreas))\nforall x (Fool(x, xavier) -> Skillful(xavier))\nforall x (Fool(x, rafe) -> Bowelless(x))\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> Fool(x, xavier))\nforall x (Skillful(x) -> Fool(x, andreas))\nnot Skillful(xavier) and not Embed(xavier, maryellen) -> not Bowelless(xavier)\n\nnot Embed(xavier, xavier)\n\nnot Embed(xavier, xavier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The roger enucleate the mady. The roger is topped. The roger forsake the mady. The roger fink the anatole. The mady enucleate the davidson. The mady enucleate the anatole. The mady is not shallow. The mady fink the roger. The mady fink the anatole. The davidson forsake the mady. The anatole enucleate the mady. The anatole is topped. The anatole is downy. The anatole is not bloodless. The anatole forsake the davidson. The anatole fink the mady. If someone enucleate the mady then the mady forsake the davidson. If someone forsake the roger then the roger is bloodless. If someone forsake the mady then they are accidental. If someone is downy then they like the roger. If someone is bloodless then they like the davidson. If the roger is not bloodless and the roger does not eat the anatole then the roger is not accidental. The davidson enucleate the davidson.", "logic": "\nEnucleate(roger, mady)\nTopped(roger)\nForsake(roger, mady)\nFink(roger, anatole)\nEnucleate(mady, davidson)\nEnucleate(mady, anatole)\nnot Shallow(mady)\nFink(mady, roger)\nFink(mady, anatole)\nForsake(davidson, mady)\nEnucleate(anatole, mady)\nTopped(anatole)\nDowny(anatole)\nnot Bloodless(anatole)\nForsake(anatole, davidson)\nFink(anatole, mady)\nforall x (Enucleate(x, mady) -> Forsake(mady, davidson))\nforall x (Forsake(x, roger) -> Bloodless(roger))\nforall x (Forsake(x, mady) -> Accidental(x))\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Forsake(x, roger))\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Forsake(x, davidson))\nnot Bloodless(roger) and not Enucleate(roger, anatole) -> not Accidental(roger)\n\nEnucleate(davidson, davidson)\n\nEnucleate(davidson, davidson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The piper combine the merlin. The piper is validating. The piper siss the merlin. The piper pilfer the dawna. The merlin combine the isabella. The merlin combine the dawna. The merlin is not permanent. The merlin pilfer the piper. The merlin pilfer the dawna. The isabella siss the merlin. The dawna combine the merlin. The dawna is validating. The dawna is irritated. The dawna is not archaic. The dawna siss the isabella. The dawna pilfer the merlin. If someone combine the merlin then the merlin siss the isabella. If someone siss the piper then the piper is archaic. If someone siss the merlin then they are elvish. If someone is irritated then they like the piper. If someone is archaic then they like the isabella. If the piper is not archaic and the piper does not eat the dawna then the piper is not elvish. The isabella does not eat the merlin.", "logic": "\nCombine(piper, merlin)\nValidating(piper)\nSiss(piper, merlin)\nPilfer(piper, dawna)\nCombine(merlin, isabella)\nCombine(merlin, dawna)\nnot Permanent(merlin)\nPilfer(merlin, piper)\nPilfer(merlin, dawna)\nSiss(isabella, merlin)\nCombine(dawna, merlin)\nValidating(dawna)\nIrritated(dawna)\nnot Archaic(dawna)\nSiss(dawna, isabella)\nPilfer(dawna, merlin)\nforall x (Combine(x, merlin) -> Siss(merlin, isabella))\nforall x (Siss(x, piper) -> Archaic(piper))\nforall x (Siss(x, merlin) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Irritated(x) -> Siss(x, piper))\nforall x (Archaic(x) -> Siss(x, isabella))\nnot Archaic(piper) and not Combine(piper, dawna) -> not Elvish(piper)\n\nnot Combine(isabella, merlin)\n\nnot Combine(isabella, merlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The brit dicker the ronni. The brit is voteless. The brit acetylate the ronni. The brit aliment the clint. The ronni dicker the adore. The ronni dicker the clint. The ronni is not snug. The ronni aliment the brit. The ronni aliment the clint. The adore acetylate the ronni. The clint dicker the ronni. The clint is voteless. The clint is large. The clint is not bettering. The clint acetylate the adore. The clint aliment the ronni. If someone dicker the ronni then the ronni acetylate the adore. If someone acetylate the brit then the brit is bettering. If someone acetylate the ronni then they are mimic. If someone is large then they like the brit. If someone is bettering then they like the adore. If the brit is not bettering and the brit does not eat the clint then the brit is not mimic. The adore is bettering.", "logic": "\nDicker(brit, ronni)\nVoteless(brit)\nAcetylate(brit, ronni)\nAliment(brit, clint)\nDicker(ronni, adore)\nDicker(ronni, clint)\nnot Snug(ronni)\nAliment(ronni, brit)\nAliment(ronni, clint)\nAcetylate(adore, ronni)\nDicker(clint, ronni)\nVoteless(clint)\nLarge(clint)\nnot Bettering(clint)\nAcetylate(clint, adore)\nAliment(clint, ronni)\nforall x (Dicker(x, ronni) -> Acetylate(ronni, adore))\nforall x (Acetylate(x, brit) -> Bettering(brit))\nforall x (Acetylate(x, ronni) -> Mimic(x))\nforall x (Large(x) -> Acetylate(x, brit))\nforall x (Bettering(x) -> Acetylate(x, adore))\nnot Bettering(brit) and not Dicker(brit, clint) -> not Mimic(brit)\n\nBettering(adore)\n\nBettering(adore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The franciska renege the roslyn. The franciska is inglorious. The franciska is autoicous. The franciska license the roslyn. The franciska license the celestina. The franciska elope the roslyn. The franciska elope the celestina. The roslyn renege the franciska. The roslyn license the franciska. The roslyn elope the celestina. The celestina renege the franciska. The celestina is tabby. The celestina is calico. The celestina is autoicous. The celestina license the roslyn. The celestina elope the roslyn. If something renege the celestina then it license the roslyn. If something elope the franciska then the franciska renege the celestina. If something elope the franciska then the franciska renege the roslyn. Big things are autoicous. If something license the roslyn then it renege the roslyn. If something renege the roslyn and it is tabby then the roslyn elope the franciska. If something license the franciska then the franciska is pessimal. If something license the franciska then it is inglorious. The franciska is inglorious.", "logic": "\nRenege(franciska, roslyn)\nInglorious(franciska)\nAutoicous(franciska)\nLicense(franciska, roslyn)\nLicense(franciska, celestina)\nElope(franciska, roslyn)\nElope(franciska, celestina)\nRenege(roslyn, franciska)\nLicense(roslyn, franciska)\nElope(roslyn, celestina)\nRenege(celestina, franciska)\nTabby(celestina)\nCalico(celestina)\nAutoicous(celestina)\nLicense(celestina, roslyn)\nElope(celestina, roslyn)\nforall x (Renege(x, celestina) -> License(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Elope(x, franciska) -> Renege(franciska, celestina))\nforall x (Elope(x, franciska) -> Renege(franciska, roslyn))\nforall x (Tabby(x) -> Autoicous(x))\nforall x (License(x, roslyn) -> Renege(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Renege(x, roslyn) and Tabby(x) -> Elope(roslyn, franciska))\nforall x (License(x, franciska) -> Pessimal(franciska))\nforall x (License(x, franciska) -> Inglorious(x))\n\nInglorious(franciska)\n\ntherefore Inglorious(franciska)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The cherry furrow the riva. The cherry is evoked. The cherry is maidenlike. The cherry vinify the riva. The cherry vinify the skippie. The cherry decode the riva. The cherry decode the skippie. The riva furrow the cherry. The riva vinify the cherry. The riva decode the skippie. The skippie furrow the cherry. The skippie is private. The skippie is provencal. The skippie is maidenlike. The skippie vinify the riva. The skippie decode the riva. If something furrow the skippie then it vinify the riva. If something decode the cherry then the cherry furrow the skippie. If something decode the cherry then the cherry furrow the riva. Big things are maidenlike. If something vinify the riva then it furrow the riva. If something furrow the riva and it is private then the riva decode the cherry. If something vinify the cherry then the cherry is motherlike. If something vinify the cherry then it is evoked. The riva does not like the cherry.", "logic": "\nFurrow(cherry, riva)\nEvoked(cherry)\nMaidenlike(cherry)\nVinify(cherry, riva)\nVinify(cherry, skippie)\nDecode(cherry, riva)\nDecode(cherry, skippie)\nFurrow(riva, cherry)\nVinify(riva, cherry)\nDecode(riva, skippie)\nFurrow(skippie, cherry)\nPrivate(skippie)\nProvencal(skippie)\nMaidenlike(skippie)\nVinify(skippie, riva)\nDecode(skippie, riva)\nforall x (Furrow(x, skippie) -> Vinify(x, riva))\nforall x (Decode(x, cherry) -> Furrow(cherry, skippie))\nforall x (Decode(x, cherry) -> Furrow(cherry, riva))\nforall x (Private(x) -> Maidenlike(x))\nforall x (Vinify(x, riva) -> Furrow(x, riva))\nforall x (Furrow(x, riva) and Private(x) -> Decode(riva, cherry))\nforall x (Vinify(x, cherry) -> Motherlike(cherry))\nforall x (Vinify(x, cherry) -> Evoked(x))\n\nnot Vinify(riva, cherry)\n\ntherefore Vinify(riva, cherry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The barret percolate the latisha. The barret is vicenary. The barret is unwrapped. The barret plasticize the latisha. The barret plasticize the avraham. The barret deny the latisha. The barret deny the avraham. The latisha percolate the barret. The latisha plasticize the barret. The latisha deny the avraham. The avraham percolate the barret. The avraham is cloggy. The avraham is spooky. The avraham is unwrapped. The avraham plasticize the latisha. The avraham deny the latisha. If something percolate the avraham then it plasticize the latisha. If something deny the barret then the barret percolate the avraham. If something deny the barret then the barret percolate the latisha. Big things are unwrapped. If something plasticize the latisha then it percolate the latisha. If something percolate the latisha and it is cloggy then the latisha deny the barret. If something plasticize the barret then the barret is deciduous. If something plasticize the barret then it is vicenary. The barret is deciduous.", "logic": "\nPercolate(barret, latisha)\nVicenary(barret)\nUnwrapped(barret)\nPlasticize(barret, latisha)\nPlasticize(barret, avraham)\nDeny(barret, latisha)\nDeny(barret, avraham)\nPercolate(latisha, barret)\nPlasticize(latisha, barret)\nDeny(latisha, avraham)\nPercolate(avraham, barret)\nCloggy(avraham)\nSpooky(avraham)\nUnwrapped(avraham)\nPlasticize(avraham, latisha)\nDeny(avraham, latisha)\nforall x (Percolate(x, avraham) -> Plasticize(x, latisha))\nforall x (Deny(x, barret) -> Percolate(barret, avraham))\nforall x (Deny(x, barret) -> Percolate(barret, latisha))\nforall x (Cloggy(x) -> Unwrapped(x))\nforall x (Plasticize(x, latisha) -> Percolate(x, latisha))\nforall x (Percolate(x, latisha) and Cloggy(x) -> Deny(latisha, barret))\nforall x (Plasticize(x, barret) -> Deciduous(barret))\nforall x (Plasticize(x, barret) -> Vicenary(x))\n\nDeciduous(barret)\n\nPlasticize(latisha, barret) and forall x (Plasticize(x, barret) -> Deciduous(barret)) -> therefore Deciduous(barret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The wain kayak the arlana. The wain is sanitized. The wain is counter. The wain callous the arlana. The wain callous the luella. The wain insufflate the arlana. The wain insufflate the luella. The arlana kayak the wain. The arlana callous the wain. The arlana insufflate the luella. The luella kayak the wain. The luella is rearmost. The luella is pendulous. The luella is counter. The luella callous the arlana. The luella insufflate the arlana. If something kayak the luella then it callous the arlana. If something insufflate the wain then the wain kayak the luella. If something insufflate the wain then the wain kayak the arlana. Big things are counter. If something callous the arlana then it kayak the arlana. If something kayak the arlana and it is rearmost then the arlana insufflate the wain. If something callous the wain then the wain is globular. If something callous the wain then it is sanitized. The wain is not globular.", "logic": "\nKayak(wain, arlana)\nSanitized(wain)\nCounter(wain)\nCallous(wain, arlana)\nCallous(wain, luella)\nInsufflate(wain, arlana)\nInsufflate(wain, luella)\nKayak(arlana, wain)\nCallous(arlana, wain)\nInsufflate(arlana, luella)\nKayak(luella, wain)\nRearmost(luella)\nPendulous(luella)\nCounter(luella)\nCallous(luella, arlana)\nInsufflate(luella, arlana)\nforall x (Kayak(x, luella) -> Callous(x, arlana))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, wain) -> Kayak(wain, luella))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, wain) -> Kayak(wain, arlana))\nforall x (Rearmost(x) -> Counter(x))\nforall x (Callous(x, arlana) -> Kayak(x, arlana))\nforall x (Kayak(x, arlana) and Rearmost(x) -> Insufflate(arlana, wain))\nforall x (Callous(x, wain) -> Globular(wain))\nforall x (Callous(x, wain) -> Sanitized(x))\n\nnot Globular(wain)\n\nCallous(arlana, wain) and forall x (Callous(x, wain) -> Globular(wain)) -> therefore Globular(wain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The nonie handcolour the jorge. The nonie is cuneate. The nonie is sovereign. The nonie allure the jorge. The nonie allure the benn. The nonie ball the jorge. The nonie ball the benn. The jorge handcolour the nonie. The jorge allure the nonie. The jorge ball the benn. The benn handcolour the nonie. The benn is anecdotal. The benn is citric. The benn is sovereign. The benn allure the jorge. The benn ball the jorge. If something handcolour the benn then it allure the jorge. If something ball the nonie then the nonie handcolour the benn. If something ball the nonie then the nonie handcolour the jorge. Big things are sovereign. If something allure the jorge then it handcolour the jorge. If something handcolour the jorge and it is anecdotal then the jorge ball the nonie. If something allure the nonie then the nonie is unmined. If something allure the nonie then it is cuneate. The jorge ball the nonie.", "logic": "\nHandcolour(nonie, jorge)\nCuneate(nonie)\nSovereign(nonie)\nAllure(nonie, jorge)\nAllure(nonie, benn)\nBall(nonie, jorge)\nBall(nonie, benn)\nHandcolour(jorge, nonie)\nAllure(jorge, nonie)\nBall(jorge, benn)\nHandcolour(benn, nonie)\nAnecdotal(benn)\nCitric(benn)\nSovereign(benn)\nAllure(benn, jorge)\nBall(benn, jorge)\nforall x (Handcolour(x, benn) -> Allure(x, jorge))\nforall x (Ball(x, nonie) -> Handcolour(nonie, benn))\nforall x (Ball(x, nonie) -> Handcolour(nonie, jorge))\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Allure(x, jorge) -> Handcolour(x, jorge))\nforall x (Handcolour(x, jorge) and Anecdotal(x) -> Ball(jorge, nonie))\nforall x (Allure(x, nonie) -> Unmined(nonie))\nforall x (Allure(x, nonie) -> Cuneate(x))\n\nBall(jorge, nonie)\n\nAllure(benn, jorge) and forall x (Allure(x, jorge) -> Handcolour(x, jorge)) -> therefore Handcolour(benn, jorge) Handcolour(benn, jorge) and Anecdotal(benn) and forall x (Handcolour(x, jorge) and Anecdotal(x) -> Ball(jorge, nonie)) -> therefore Ball(jorge, nonie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The tuck bury the darleen. The tuck is nuclear. The tuck is dignified. The tuck sick the darleen. The tuck sick the fanchon. The tuck roister the darleen. The tuck roister the fanchon. The darleen bury the tuck. The darleen sick the tuck. The darleen roister the fanchon. The fanchon bury the tuck. The fanchon is elfish. The fanchon is festal. The fanchon is dignified. The fanchon sick the darleen. The fanchon roister the darleen. If something bury the fanchon then it sick the darleen. If something roister the tuck then the tuck bury the fanchon. If something roister the tuck then the tuck bury the darleen. Big things are dignified. If something sick the darleen then it bury the darleen. If something bury the darleen and it is elfish then the darleen roister the tuck. If something sick the tuck then the tuck is potted. If something sick the tuck then it is nuclear. The darleen does not see the tuck.", "logic": "\nBury(tuck, darleen)\nNuclear(tuck)\nDignified(tuck)\nSick(tuck, darleen)\nSick(tuck, fanchon)\nRoister(tuck, darleen)\nRoister(tuck, fanchon)\nBury(darleen, tuck)\nSick(darleen, tuck)\nRoister(darleen, fanchon)\nBury(fanchon, tuck)\nElfish(fanchon)\nFestal(fanchon)\nDignified(fanchon)\nSick(fanchon, darleen)\nRoister(fanchon, darleen)\nforall x (Bury(x, fanchon) -> Sick(x, darleen))\nforall x (Roister(x, tuck) -> Bury(tuck, fanchon))\nforall x (Roister(x, tuck) -> Bury(tuck, darleen))\nforall x (Elfish(x) -> Dignified(x))\nforall x (Sick(x, darleen) -> Bury(x, darleen))\nforall x (Bury(x, darleen) and Elfish(x) -> Roister(darleen, tuck))\nforall x (Sick(x, tuck) -> Potted(tuck))\nforall x (Sick(x, tuck) -> Nuclear(x))\n\nnot Roister(darleen, tuck)\n\nSick(fanchon, darleen) and forall x (Sick(x, darleen) -> Bury(x, darleen)) -> therefore Bury(fanchon, darleen) Bury(fanchon, darleen) and Elfish(fanchon) and forall x (Bury(x, darleen) and Elfish(x) -> Roister(darleen, tuck)) -> therefore Roister(darleen, tuck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The venkat scythe the augusta. The venkat is gummy. The venkat is whippy. The venkat teleport the augusta. The venkat teleport the kassia. The venkat drydock the augusta. The venkat drydock the kassia. The augusta scythe the venkat. The augusta teleport the venkat. The augusta drydock the kassia. The kassia scythe the venkat. The kassia is telescoped. The kassia is hardheaded. The kassia is whippy. The kassia teleport the augusta. The kassia drydock the augusta. If something scythe the kassia then it teleport the augusta. If something drydock the venkat then the venkat scythe the kassia. If something drydock the venkat then the venkat scythe the augusta. Big things are whippy. If something teleport the augusta then it scythe the augusta. If something scythe the augusta and it is telescoped then the augusta drydock the venkat. If something teleport the venkat then the venkat is laggard. If something teleport the venkat then it is gummy. The venkat scythe the kassia.", "logic": "\nScythe(venkat, augusta)\nGummy(venkat)\nWhippy(venkat)\nTeleport(venkat, augusta)\nTeleport(venkat, kassia)\nDrydock(venkat, augusta)\nDrydock(venkat, kassia)\nScythe(augusta, venkat)\nTeleport(augusta, venkat)\nDrydock(augusta, kassia)\nScythe(kassia, venkat)\nTelescoped(kassia)\nHardheaded(kassia)\nWhippy(kassia)\nTeleport(kassia, augusta)\nDrydock(kassia, augusta)\nforall x (Scythe(x, kassia) -> Teleport(x, augusta))\nforall x (Drydock(x, venkat) -> Scythe(venkat, kassia))\nforall x (Drydock(x, venkat) -> Scythe(venkat, augusta))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Teleport(x, augusta) -> Scythe(x, augusta))\nforall x (Scythe(x, augusta) and Telescoped(x) -> Drydock(augusta, venkat))\nforall x (Teleport(x, venkat) -> Laggard(venkat))\nforall x (Teleport(x, venkat) -> Gummy(x))\n\nScythe(venkat, kassia)\n\nTeleport(kassia, augusta) and forall x (Teleport(x, augusta) -> Scythe(x, augusta)) -> therefore Scythe(kassia, augusta) Scythe(kassia, augusta) and Telescoped(kassia) and forall x (Scythe(x, augusta) and Telescoped(x) -> Drydock(augusta, venkat)) -> therefore Drydock(augusta, venkat) Drydock(augusta, venkat) and forall x (Drydock(x, venkat) -> Scythe(venkat, kassia)) -> therefore Scythe(venkat, kassia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The zacharie discern the mikey. The zacharie is avowed. The zacharie is schmaltzy. The zacharie revive the mikey. The zacharie revive the kostas. The zacharie delineate the mikey. The zacharie delineate the kostas. The mikey discern the zacharie. The mikey revive the zacharie. The mikey delineate the kostas. The kostas discern the zacharie. The kostas is suety. The kostas is positional. The kostas is schmaltzy. The kostas revive the mikey. The kostas delineate the mikey. If something discern the kostas then it revive the mikey. If something delineate the zacharie then the zacharie discern the kostas. If something delineate the zacharie then the zacharie discern the mikey. Big things are schmaltzy. If something revive the mikey then it discern the mikey. If something discern the mikey and it is suety then the mikey delineate the zacharie. If something revive the zacharie then the zacharie is hypertonic. If something revive the zacharie then it is avowed. The zacharie does not eat the kostas.", "logic": "\nDiscern(zacharie, mikey)\nAvowed(zacharie)\nSchmaltzy(zacharie)\nRevive(zacharie, mikey)\nRevive(zacharie, kostas)\nDelineate(zacharie, mikey)\nDelineate(zacharie, kostas)\nDiscern(mikey, zacharie)\nRevive(mikey, zacharie)\nDelineate(mikey, kostas)\nDiscern(kostas, zacharie)\nSuety(kostas)\nPositional(kostas)\nSchmaltzy(kostas)\nRevive(kostas, mikey)\nDelineate(kostas, mikey)\nforall x (Discern(x, kostas) -> Revive(x, mikey))\nforall x (Delineate(x, zacharie) -> Discern(zacharie, kostas))\nforall x (Delineate(x, zacharie) -> Discern(zacharie, mikey))\nforall x (Suety(x) -> Schmaltzy(x))\nforall x (Revive(x, mikey) -> Discern(x, mikey))\nforall x (Discern(x, mikey) and Suety(x) -> Delineate(mikey, zacharie))\nforall x (Revive(x, zacharie) -> Hypertonic(zacharie))\nforall x (Revive(x, zacharie) -> Avowed(x))\n\nnot Discern(zacharie, kostas)\n\nRevive(kostas, mikey) and forall x (Revive(x, mikey) -> Discern(x, mikey)) -> therefore Discern(kostas, mikey) Discern(kostas, mikey) and Suety(kostas) and forall x (Discern(x, mikey) and Suety(x) -> Delineate(mikey, zacharie)) -> therefore Delineate(mikey, zacharie) Delineate(mikey, zacharie) and forall x (Delineate(x, zacharie) -> Discern(zacharie, kostas)) -> therefore Discern(zacharie, kostas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The marcos postdate the madge. The marcos is showy. The marcos is shady. The marcos ignite the madge. The marcos ignite the giffard. The marcos taper the madge. The marcos taper the giffard. The madge postdate the marcos. The madge ignite the marcos. The madge taper the giffard. The giffard postdate the marcos. The giffard is crooked. The giffard is eudaemonic. The giffard is shady. The giffard ignite the madge. The giffard taper the madge. If something postdate the giffard then it ignite the madge. If something taper the marcos then the marcos postdate the giffard. If something taper the marcos then the marcos postdate the madge. Big things are shady. If something ignite the madge then it postdate the madge. If something postdate the madge and it is crooked then the madge taper the marcos. If something ignite the marcos then the marcos is globose. If something ignite the marcos then it is showy. The madge is not shady.", "logic": "\nPostdate(marcos, madge)\nShowy(marcos)\nShady(marcos)\nIgnite(marcos, madge)\nIgnite(marcos, giffard)\nTaper(marcos, madge)\nTaper(marcos, giffard)\nPostdate(madge, marcos)\nIgnite(madge, marcos)\nTaper(madge, giffard)\nPostdate(giffard, marcos)\nCrooked(giffard)\nEudaemonic(giffard)\nShady(giffard)\nIgnite(giffard, madge)\nTaper(giffard, madge)\nforall x (Postdate(x, giffard) -> Ignite(x, madge))\nforall x (Taper(x, marcos) -> Postdate(marcos, giffard))\nforall x (Taper(x, marcos) -> Postdate(marcos, madge))\nforall x (Crooked(x) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Ignite(x, madge) -> Postdate(x, madge))\nforall x (Postdate(x, madge) and Crooked(x) -> Taper(madge, marcos))\nforall x (Ignite(x, marcos) -> Globose(marcos))\nforall x (Ignite(x, marcos) -> Showy(x))\n\nnot Shady(madge)\n\nforall x (Crooked(x) -> Shady(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The maxwell snowboard the aili. The maxwell is fortified. The maxwell is shocking. The maxwell talk the aili. The maxwell talk the stephanus. The maxwell underlie the aili. The maxwell underlie the stephanus. The aili snowboard the maxwell. The aili talk the maxwell. The aili underlie the stephanus. The stephanus snowboard the maxwell. The stephanus is diazo. The stephanus is squarish. The stephanus is shocking. The stephanus talk the aili. The stephanus underlie the aili. If something snowboard the stephanus then it talk the aili. If something underlie the maxwell then the maxwell snowboard the stephanus. If something underlie the maxwell then the maxwell snowboard the aili. Big things are shocking. If something talk the aili then it snowboard the aili. If something snowboard the aili and it is diazo then the aili underlie the maxwell. If something talk the maxwell then the maxwell is ethnologic. If something talk the maxwell then it is fortified. The stephanus is fortified.", "logic": "\nSnowboard(maxwell, aili)\nFortified(maxwell)\nShocking(maxwell)\nTalk(maxwell, aili)\nTalk(maxwell, stephanus)\nUnderlie(maxwell, aili)\nUnderlie(maxwell, stephanus)\nSnowboard(aili, maxwell)\nTalk(aili, maxwell)\nUnderlie(aili, stephanus)\nSnowboard(stephanus, maxwell)\nDiazo(stephanus)\nSquarish(stephanus)\nShocking(stephanus)\nTalk(stephanus, aili)\nUnderlie(stephanus, aili)\nforall x (Snowboard(x, stephanus) -> Talk(x, aili))\nforall x (Underlie(x, maxwell) -> Snowboard(maxwell, stephanus))\nforall x (Underlie(x, maxwell) -> Snowboard(maxwell, aili))\nforall x (Diazo(x) -> Shocking(x))\nforall x (Talk(x, aili) -> Snowboard(x, aili))\nforall x (Snowboard(x, aili) and Diazo(x) -> Underlie(aili, maxwell))\nforall x (Talk(x, maxwell) -> Ethnologic(maxwell))\nforall x (Talk(x, maxwell) -> Fortified(x))\n\nFortified(stephanus)\n\nforall x (Talk(x, maxwell) -> Fortified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The jerrilee belittle the ardenia. The jerrilee is waspish. The jerrilee is ethereal. The jerrilee evacuate the ardenia. The jerrilee evacuate the cathy. The jerrilee pimp the ardenia. The jerrilee pimp the cathy. The ardenia belittle the jerrilee. The ardenia evacuate the jerrilee. The ardenia pimp the cathy. The cathy belittle the jerrilee. The cathy is papistic. The cathy is unsown. The cathy is ethereal. The cathy evacuate the ardenia. The cathy pimp the ardenia. If something belittle the cathy then it evacuate the ardenia. If something pimp the jerrilee then the jerrilee belittle the cathy. If something pimp the jerrilee then the jerrilee belittle the ardenia. Big things are ethereal. If something evacuate the ardenia then it belittle the ardenia. If something belittle the ardenia and it is papistic then the ardenia pimp the jerrilee. If something evacuate the jerrilee then the jerrilee is ambitious. If something evacuate the jerrilee then it is waspish. The ardenia does not like the ardenia.", "logic": "\nBelittle(jerrilee, ardenia)\nWaspish(jerrilee)\nEthereal(jerrilee)\nEvacuate(jerrilee, ardenia)\nEvacuate(jerrilee, cathy)\nPimp(jerrilee, ardenia)\nPimp(jerrilee, cathy)\nBelittle(ardenia, jerrilee)\nEvacuate(ardenia, jerrilee)\nPimp(ardenia, cathy)\nBelittle(cathy, jerrilee)\nPapistic(cathy)\nUnsown(cathy)\nEthereal(cathy)\nEvacuate(cathy, ardenia)\nPimp(cathy, ardenia)\nforall x (Belittle(x, cathy) -> Evacuate(x, ardenia))\nforall x (Pimp(x, jerrilee) -> Belittle(jerrilee, cathy))\nforall x (Pimp(x, jerrilee) -> Belittle(jerrilee, ardenia))\nforall x (Papistic(x) -> Ethereal(x))\nforall x (Evacuate(x, ardenia) -> Belittle(x, ardenia))\nforall x (Belittle(x, ardenia) and Papistic(x) -> Pimp(ardenia, jerrilee))\nforall x (Evacuate(x, jerrilee) -> Ambitious(jerrilee))\nforall x (Evacuate(x, jerrilee) -> Waspish(x))\n\nnot Evacuate(ardenia, ardenia)\n\nforall x (Belittle(x, cathy) -> Evacuate(x, ardenia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The cherice rifle the melloney. The cherice is rachitic. The cherice is unsyllabic. The cherice silkscreen the melloney. The cherice silkscreen the ruthy. The cherice shatter the melloney. The cherice shatter the ruthy. The melloney rifle the cherice. The melloney silkscreen the cherice. The melloney shatter the ruthy. The ruthy rifle the cherice. The ruthy is meditative. The ruthy is jesuitical. The ruthy is unsyllabic. The ruthy silkscreen the melloney. The ruthy shatter the melloney. If something rifle the ruthy then it silkscreen the melloney. If something shatter the cherice then the cherice rifle the ruthy. If something shatter the cherice then the cherice rifle the melloney. Big things are unsyllabic. If something silkscreen the melloney then it rifle the melloney. If something rifle the melloney and it is meditative then the melloney shatter the cherice. If something silkscreen the cherice then the cherice is waspish. If something silkscreen the cherice then it is rachitic. The melloney rifle the melloney.", "logic": "\nRifle(cherice, melloney)\nRachitic(cherice)\nUnsyllabic(cherice)\nSilkscreen(cherice, melloney)\nSilkscreen(cherice, ruthy)\nShatter(cherice, melloney)\nShatter(cherice, ruthy)\nRifle(melloney, cherice)\nSilkscreen(melloney, cherice)\nShatter(melloney, ruthy)\nRifle(ruthy, cherice)\nMeditative(ruthy)\nJesuitical(ruthy)\nUnsyllabic(ruthy)\nSilkscreen(ruthy, melloney)\nShatter(ruthy, melloney)\nforall x (Rifle(x, ruthy) -> Silkscreen(x, melloney))\nforall x (Shatter(x, cherice) -> Rifle(cherice, ruthy))\nforall x (Shatter(x, cherice) -> Rifle(cherice, melloney))\nforall x (Meditative(x) -> Unsyllabic(x))\nforall x (Silkscreen(x, melloney) -> Rifle(x, melloney))\nforall x (Rifle(x, melloney) and Meditative(x) -> Shatter(melloney, cherice))\nforall x (Silkscreen(x, cherice) -> Waspish(cherice))\nforall x (Silkscreen(x, cherice) -> Rachitic(x))\n\nRifle(melloney, melloney)\n\nforall x (Silkscreen(x, melloney) -> Rifle(x, melloney)) <- forall x (Rifle(x, ruthy) -> Silkscreen(x, melloney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The lauralee syllogize the faunie. The lauralee is opencut. The lauralee is unequal. The lauralee trump the faunie. The lauralee trump the bertram. The lauralee fowl the faunie. The lauralee fowl the bertram. The faunie syllogize the lauralee. The faunie trump the lauralee. The faunie fowl the bertram. The bertram syllogize the lauralee. The bertram is potted. The bertram is testy. The bertram is unequal. The bertram trump the faunie. The bertram fowl the faunie. If something syllogize the bertram then it trump the faunie. If something fowl the lauralee then the lauralee syllogize the bertram. If something fowl the lauralee then the lauralee syllogize the faunie. Big things are unequal. If something trump the faunie then it syllogize the faunie. If something syllogize the faunie and it is potted then the faunie fowl the lauralee. If something trump the lauralee then the lauralee is laughable. If something trump the lauralee then it is opencut. The faunie is not laughable.", "logic": "\nSyllogize(lauralee, faunie)\nOpencut(lauralee)\nUnequal(lauralee)\nTrump(lauralee, faunie)\nTrump(lauralee, bertram)\nFowl(lauralee, faunie)\nFowl(lauralee, bertram)\nSyllogize(faunie, lauralee)\nTrump(faunie, lauralee)\nFowl(faunie, bertram)\nSyllogize(bertram, lauralee)\nPotted(bertram)\nTesty(bertram)\nUnequal(bertram)\nTrump(bertram, faunie)\nFowl(bertram, faunie)\nforall x (Syllogize(x, bertram) -> Trump(x, faunie))\nforall x (Fowl(x, lauralee) -> Syllogize(lauralee, bertram))\nforall x (Fowl(x, lauralee) -> Syllogize(lauralee, faunie))\nforall x (Potted(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Trump(x, faunie) -> Syllogize(x, faunie))\nforall x (Syllogize(x, faunie) and Potted(x) -> Fowl(faunie, lauralee))\nforall x (Trump(x, lauralee) -> Laughable(lauralee))\nforall x (Trump(x, lauralee) -> Opencut(x))\n\nnot Laughable(faunie)\n\nnot Laughable(faunie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The carlee sorrow the michelle. The carlee is graduate. The carlee is fewest. The carlee numb the michelle. The carlee numb the inge. The carlee burnish the michelle. The carlee burnish the inge. The michelle sorrow the carlee. The michelle numb the carlee. The michelle burnish the inge. The inge sorrow the carlee. The inge is advanced. The inge is wheaten. The inge is fewest. The inge numb the michelle. The inge burnish the michelle. If something sorrow the inge then it numb the michelle. If something burnish the carlee then the carlee sorrow the inge. If something burnish the carlee then the carlee sorrow the michelle. Big things are fewest. If something numb the michelle then it sorrow the michelle. If something sorrow the michelle and it is advanced then the michelle burnish the carlee. If something numb the carlee then the carlee is agrestic. If something numb the carlee then it is graduate. The carlee sorrow the carlee.", "logic": "\nSorrow(carlee, michelle)\nGraduate(carlee)\nFewest(carlee)\nNumb(carlee, michelle)\nNumb(carlee, inge)\nBurnish(carlee, michelle)\nBurnish(carlee, inge)\nSorrow(michelle, carlee)\nNumb(michelle, carlee)\nBurnish(michelle, inge)\nSorrow(inge, carlee)\nAdvanced(inge)\nWheaten(inge)\nFewest(inge)\nNumb(inge, michelle)\nBurnish(inge, michelle)\nforall x (Sorrow(x, inge) -> Numb(x, michelle))\nforall x (Burnish(x, carlee) -> Sorrow(carlee, inge))\nforall x (Burnish(x, carlee) -> Sorrow(carlee, michelle))\nforall x (Advanced(x) -> Fewest(x))\nforall x (Numb(x, michelle) -> Sorrow(x, michelle))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, michelle) and Advanced(x) -> Burnish(michelle, carlee))\nforall x (Numb(x, carlee) -> Agrestic(carlee))\nforall x (Numb(x, carlee) -> Graduate(x))\n\nSorrow(carlee, carlee)\n\nSorrow(carlee, carlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The partha garrison the freida. The partha is syncarpous. The partha is consistent. The partha plod the freida. The partha plod the erick. The partha coast the freida. The partha coast the erick. The freida garrison the partha. The freida plod the partha. The freida coast the erick. The erick garrison the partha. The erick is nonaligned. The erick is appareled. The erick is consistent. The erick plod the freida. The erick coast the freida. If something garrison the erick then it plod the freida. If something coast the partha then the partha garrison the erick. If something coast the partha then the partha garrison the freida. Big things are consistent. If something plod the freida then it garrison the freida. If something garrison the freida and it is nonaligned then the freida coast the partha. If something plod the partha then the partha is marsupial. If something plod the partha then it is syncarpous. The erick does not see the partha.", "logic": "\nGarrison(partha, freida)\nSyncarpous(partha)\nConsistent(partha)\nPlod(partha, freida)\nPlod(partha, erick)\nCoast(partha, freida)\nCoast(partha, erick)\nGarrison(freida, partha)\nPlod(freida, partha)\nCoast(freida, erick)\nGarrison(erick, partha)\nNonaligned(erick)\nAppareled(erick)\nConsistent(erick)\nPlod(erick, freida)\nCoast(erick, freida)\nforall x (Garrison(x, erick) -> Plod(x, freida))\nforall x (Coast(x, partha) -> Garrison(partha, erick))\nforall x (Coast(x, partha) -> Garrison(partha, freida))\nforall x (Nonaligned(x) -> Consistent(x))\nforall x (Plod(x, freida) -> Garrison(x, freida))\nforall x (Garrison(x, freida) and Nonaligned(x) -> Coast(freida, partha))\nforall x (Plod(x, partha) -> Marsupial(partha))\nforall x (Plod(x, partha) -> Syncarpous(x))\n\nnot Coast(erick, partha)\n\nnot Coast(erick, partha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The vittoria impend the silvain. The vittoria is sizeable. The vittoria is peltate. The vittoria charcoal the silvain. The vittoria charcoal the karylin. The vittoria jail the silvain. The vittoria jail the karylin. The silvain impend the vittoria. The silvain charcoal the vittoria. The silvain jail the karylin. The karylin impend the vittoria. The karylin is bottommost. The karylin is foster. The karylin is peltate. The karylin charcoal the silvain. The karylin jail the silvain. If something impend the karylin then it charcoal the silvain. If something jail the vittoria then the vittoria impend the karylin. If something jail the vittoria then the vittoria impend the silvain. Big things are peltate. If something charcoal the silvain then it impend the silvain. If something impend the silvain and it is bottommost then the silvain jail the vittoria. If something charcoal the vittoria then the vittoria is bats. If something charcoal the vittoria then it is sizeable. The karylin is bats.", "logic": "\nImpend(vittoria, silvain)\nSizeable(vittoria)\nPeltate(vittoria)\nCharcoal(vittoria, silvain)\nCharcoal(vittoria, karylin)\nJail(vittoria, silvain)\nJail(vittoria, karylin)\nImpend(silvain, vittoria)\nCharcoal(silvain, vittoria)\nJail(silvain, karylin)\nImpend(karylin, vittoria)\nBottommost(karylin)\nFoster(karylin)\nPeltate(karylin)\nCharcoal(karylin, silvain)\nJail(karylin, silvain)\nforall x (Impend(x, karylin) -> Charcoal(x, silvain))\nforall x (Jail(x, vittoria) -> Impend(vittoria, karylin))\nforall x (Jail(x, vittoria) -> Impend(vittoria, silvain))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Charcoal(x, silvain) -> Impend(x, silvain))\nforall x (Impend(x, silvain) and Bottommost(x) -> Jail(silvain, vittoria))\nforall x (Charcoal(x, vittoria) -> Bats(vittoria))\nforall x (Charcoal(x, vittoria) -> Sizeable(x))\n\nBats(karylin)\n\nBats(karylin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The tessi is resiny. The maure is resiny. If something is divers then it is demanding. If something amount the maure and the maure narcotise the tessi then it is crustose. If something narcotise the maure then the maure hash the tessi. If something is demanding then it amount the tessi. If something amount the tessi then it narcotise the tessi. All resiny things are lesbian. If something is demanding and it narcotise the tessi then it is lesbian. If something is resiny then it is demanding. The maure is resiny.", "logic": "\nResiny(tessi)\nResiny(maure)\nforall x (Divers(x) -> Demanding(x))\nforall x (Amount(x, maure) and Narcotise(maure, tessi) -> Crustose(x))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, maure) -> Hash(maure, tessi))\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Amount(x, tessi))\nforall x (Amount(x, tessi) -> Narcotise(x, tessi))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Lesbian(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) and Narcotise(x, tessi) -> Lesbian(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Demanding(x))\n\nResiny(maure)\n\ntherefore Resiny(maure)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The dory is unlabeled. The ravi is unlabeled. If something is buddhist then it is obedient. If something blockade the ravi and the ravi quickstep the dory then it is dyslexic. If something quickstep the ravi then the ravi unsex the dory. If something is obedient then it blockade the dory. If something blockade the dory then it quickstep the dory. All unlabeled things are zestful. If something is obedient and it quickstep the dory then it is zestful. If something is unlabeled then it is obedient. The dory is not unlabeled.", "logic": "\nUnlabeled(dory)\nUnlabeled(ravi)\nforall x (Buddhist(x) -> Obedient(x))\nforall x (Blockade(x, ravi) and Quickstep(ravi, dory) -> Dyslexic(x))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, ravi) -> Unsex(ravi, dory))\nforall x (Obedient(x) -> Blockade(x, dory))\nforall x (Blockade(x, dory) -> Quickstep(x, dory))\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) -> Zestful(x))\nforall x (Obedient(x) and Quickstep(x, dory) -> Zestful(x))\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) -> Obedient(x))\n\nnot Unlabeled(dory)\n\ntherefore Unlabeled(dory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The lou is actinal. The ayn is actinal. If something is dodgy then it is hoydenish. If something skitter the ayn and the ayn slate the lou then it is bilabial. If something slate the ayn then the ayn splay the lou. If something is hoydenish then it skitter the lou. If something skitter the lou then it slate the lou. All actinal things are prefatory. If something is hoydenish and it slate the lou then it is prefatory. If something is actinal then it is hoydenish. The lou is hoydenish.", "logic": "\nActinal(lou)\nActinal(ayn)\nforall x (Dodgy(x) -> Hoydenish(x))\nforall x (Skitter(x, ayn) and Slate(ayn, lou) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Slate(x, ayn) -> Splay(ayn, lou))\nforall x (Hoydenish(x) -> Skitter(x, lou))\nforall x (Skitter(x, lou) -> Slate(x, lou))\nforall x (Actinal(x) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Hoydenish(x) and Slate(x, lou) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Actinal(x) -> Hoydenish(x))\n\nHoydenish(lou)\n\nActinal(lou) and forall x (Actinal(x) -> Hoydenish(x)) -> therefore Hoydenish(lou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The marjy is chylous. The nataline is chylous. If something is unstirred then it is eight. If something harrow the nataline and the nataline jelly the marjy then it is connected. If something jelly the nataline then the nataline register the marjy. If something is eight then it harrow the marjy. If something harrow the marjy then it jelly the marjy. All chylous things are epileptic. If something is eight and it jelly the marjy then it is epileptic. If something is chylous then it is eight. The marjy is not eight.", "logic": "\nChylous(marjy)\nChylous(nataline)\nforall x (Unstirred(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Harrow(x, nataline) and Jelly(nataline, marjy) -> Connected(x))\nforall x (Jelly(x, nataline) -> Register(nataline, marjy))\nforall x (Eight(x) -> Harrow(x, marjy))\nforall x (Harrow(x, marjy) -> Jelly(x, marjy))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Eight(x) and Jelly(x, marjy) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Eight(x))\n\nnot Eight(marjy)\n\nChylous(marjy) and forall x (Chylous(x) -> Eight(x)) -> therefore Eight(marjy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The alejandro is functional. The kermit is functional. If something is through then it is ragged. If something enlist the kermit and the kermit speculate the alejandro then it is coptic. If something speculate the kermit then the kermit unsettle the alejandro. If something is ragged then it enlist the alejandro. If something enlist the alejandro then it speculate the alejandro. All functional things are swaggering. If something is ragged and it speculate the alejandro then it is swaggering. If something is functional then it is ragged. The kermit enlist the alejandro.", "logic": "\nFunctional(alejandro)\nFunctional(kermit)\nforall x (Through(x) -> Ragged(x))\nforall x (Enlist(x, kermit) and Speculate(kermit, alejandro) -> Coptic(x))\nforall x (Speculate(x, kermit) -> Unsettle(kermit, alejandro))\nforall x (Ragged(x) -> Enlist(x, alejandro))\nforall x (Enlist(x, alejandro) -> Speculate(x, alejandro))\nforall x (Functional(x) -> Swaggering(x))\nforall x (Ragged(x) and Speculate(x, alejandro) -> Swaggering(x))\nforall x (Functional(x) -> Ragged(x))\n\nEnlist(kermit, alejandro)\n\nFunctional(kermit) and forall x (Functional(x) -> Ragged(x)) -> therefore Ragged(kermit) Ragged(kermit) and forall x (Ragged(x) -> Enlist(x, alejandro)) -> therefore Enlist(kermit, alejandro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The tiphany is nuclear. The eduard is nuclear. If something is divers then it is elastic. If something pound the eduard and the eduard retread the tiphany then it is unrecorded. If something retread the eduard then the eduard emboss the tiphany. If something is elastic then it pound the tiphany. If something pound the tiphany then it retread the tiphany. All nuclear things are matured. If something is elastic and it retread the tiphany then it is matured. If something is nuclear then it is elastic. The tiphany does not visit the tiphany.", "logic": "\nNuclear(tiphany)\nNuclear(eduard)\nforall x (Divers(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Pound(x, eduard) and Retread(eduard, tiphany) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Retread(x, eduard) -> Emboss(eduard, tiphany))\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Pound(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Pound(x, tiphany) -> Retread(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Nuclear(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) and Retread(x, tiphany) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Nuclear(x) -> Elastic(x))\n\nnot Pound(tiphany, tiphany)\n\nNuclear(tiphany) and forall x (Nuclear(x) -> Elastic(x)) -> therefore Elastic(tiphany) Elastic(tiphany) and forall x (Elastic(x) -> Pound(x, tiphany)) -> therefore Pound(tiphany, tiphany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The audrie is pectineal. The bela is pectineal. If something is palpebrate then it is smutty. If something convolve the bela and the bela tinkle the audrie then it is whatsoever. If something tinkle the bela then the bela sidetrack the audrie. If something is smutty then it convolve the audrie. If something convolve the audrie then it tinkle the audrie. All pectineal things are mealy. If something is smutty and it tinkle the audrie then it is mealy. If something is pectineal then it is smutty. The bela tinkle the audrie.", "logic": "\nPectineal(audrie)\nPectineal(bela)\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Smutty(x))\nforall x (Convolve(x, bela) and Tinkle(bela, audrie) -> Whatsoever(x))\nforall x (Tinkle(x, bela) -> Sidetrack(bela, audrie))\nforall x (Smutty(x) -> Convolve(x, audrie))\nforall x (Convolve(x, audrie) -> Tinkle(x, audrie))\nforall x (Pectineal(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Smutty(x) and Tinkle(x, audrie) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Pectineal(x) -> Smutty(x))\n\nTinkle(bela, audrie)\n\nPectineal(bela) and forall x (Pectineal(x) -> Smutty(x)) -> therefore Smutty(bela) Smutty(bela) and forall x (Smutty(x) -> Convolve(x, audrie)) -> therefore Convolve(bela, audrie) Convolve(bela, audrie) and forall x (Convolve(x, audrie) -> Tinkle(x, audrie)) -> therefore Tinkle(bela, audrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The sussi is advertised. The aditya is advertised. If something is jawless then it is ovine. If something update the aditya and the aditya forbid the sussi then it is halt. If something forbid the aditya then the aditya gaol the sussi. If something is ovine then it update the sussi. If something update the sussi then it forbid the sussi. All advertised things are dicky. If something is ovine and it forbid the sussi then it is dicky. If something is advertised then it is ovine. The aditya does not need the sussi.", "logic": "\nAdvertised(sussi)\nAdvertised(aditya)\nforall x (Jawless(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Update(x, aditya) and Forbid(aditya, sussi) -> Halt(x))\nforall x (Forbid(x, aditya) -> Gaol(aditya, sussi))\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> Update(x, sussi))\nforall x (Update(x, sussi) -> Forbid(x, sussi))\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) and Forbid(x, sussi) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> Ovine(x))\n\nnot Forbid(aditya, sussi)\n\nAdvertised(aditya) and forall x (Advertised(x) -> Ovine(x)) -> therefore Ovine(aditya) Ovine(aditya) and forall x (Ovine(x) -> Update(x, sussi)) -> therefore Update(aditya, sussi) Update(aditya, sussi) and forall x (Update(x, sussi) -> Forbid(x, sussi)) -> therefore Forbid(aditya, sussi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The aleks is wilful. The goldarina is wilful. If something is bovine then it is titular. If something immerse the goldarina and the goldarina dramatize the aleks then it is rackety. If something dramatize the goldarina then the goldarina racket the aleks. If something is titular then it immerse the aleks. If something immerse the aleks then it dramatize the aleks. All wilful things are unsigned. If something is titular and it dramatize the aleks then it is unsigned. If something is wilful then it is titular. The aleks is not rackety.", "logic": "\nWilful(aleks)\nWilful(goldarina)\nforall x (Bovine(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Immerse(x, goldarina) and Dramatize(goldarina, aleks) -> Rackety(x))\nforall x (Dramatize(x, goldarina) -> Racket(goldarina, aleks))\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Immerse(x, aleks))\nforall x (Immerse(x, aleks) -> Dramatize(x, aleks))\nforall x (Wilful(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Titular(x) and Dramatize(x, aleks) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Wilful(x) -> Titular(x))\n\nnot Rackety(aleks)\n\nforall x (Immerse(x, goldarina) and Dramatize(goldarina, aleks) -> Rackety(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The trenna is basilary. The weylin is basilary. If something is sumptuous then it is deskbound. If something clump the weylin and the weylin scuffle the trenna then it is pampering. If something scuffle the weylin then the weylin snow the trenna. If something is deskbound then it clump the trenna. If something clump the trenna then it scuffle the trenna. All basilary things are pretty. If something is deskbound and it scuffle the trenna then it is pretty. If something is basilary then it is deskbound. The weylin is pampering.", "logic": "\nBasilary(trenna)\nBasilary(weylin)\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Deskbound(x))\nforall x (Clump(x, weylin) and Scuffle(weylin, trenna) -> Pampering(x))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, weylin) -> Snow(weylin, trenna))\nforall x (Deskbound(x) -> Clump(x, trenna))\nforall x (Clump(x, trenna) -> Scuffle(x, trenna))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (Deskbound(x) and Scuffle(x, trenna) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Deskbound(x))\n\nPampering(weylin)\n\nforall x (Clump(x, weylin) and Scuffle(weylin, trenna) -> Pampering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The mable is straggling. The flossy is straggling. If something is faecal then it is mediocre. If something bulldog the flossy and the flossy reignite the mable then it is racking. If something reignite the flossy then the flossy rhapsodize the mable. If something is mediocre then it bulldog the mable. If something bulldog the mable then it reignite the mable. All straggling things are drafty. If something is mediocre and it reignite the mable then it is drafty. If something is straggling then it is mediocre. The flossy does not see the mable.", "logic": "\nStraggling(mable)\nStraggling(flossy)\nforall x (Faecal(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, flossy) and Reignite(flossy, mable) -> Racking(x))\nforall x (Reignite(x, flossy) -> Rhapsodize(flossy, mable))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) -> Bulldog(x, mable))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, mable) -> Reignite(x, mable))\nforall x (Straggling(x) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) and Reignite(x, mable) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Straggling(x) -> Mediocre(x))\n\nnot Rhapsodize(flossy, mable)\n\nforall x (Reignite(x, flossy) -> Rhapsodize(flossy, mable)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The roch is septal. The rafaela is septal. If something is recusant then it is annoyed. If something prologise the rafaela and the rafaela accrete the roch then it is afghani. If something accrete the rafaela then the rafaela troll the roch. If something is annoyed then it prologise the roch. If something prologise the roch then it accrete the roch. All septal things are congealed. If something is annoyed and it accrete the roch then it is congealed. If something is septal then it is annoyed. The roch troll the rafaela.", "logic": "\nSeptal(roch)\nSeptal(rafaela)\nforall x (Recusant(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Prologise(x, rafaela) and Accrete(rafaela, roch) -> Afghani(x))\nforall x (Accrete(x, rafaela) -> Troll(rafaela, roch))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Prologise(x, roch))\nforall x (Prologise(x, roch) -> Accrete(x, roch))\nforall x (Septal(x) -> Congealed(x))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) and Accrete(x, roch) -> Congealed(x))\nforall x (Septal(x) -> Annoyed(x))\n\nTroll(roch, rafaela)\n\nTroll(roch, rafaela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The jonny is convolute. The gerrard is convolute. If something is berserk then it is misogynic. If something snow the gerrard and the gerrard immunise the jonny then it is botanical. If something immunise the gerrard then the gerrard chemisorb the jonny. If something is misogynic then it snow the jonny. If something snow the jonny then it immunise the jonny. All convolute things are perforate. If something is misogynic and it immunise the jonny then it is perforate. If something is convolute then it is misogynic. The gerrard does not need the gerrard.", "logic": "\nConvolute(jonny)\nConvolute(gerrard)\nforall x (Berserk(x) -> Misogynic(x))\nforall x (Snow(x, gerrard) and Immunise(gerrard, jonny) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Immunise(x, gerrard) -> Chemisorb(gerrard, jonny))\nforall x (Misogynic(x) -> Snow(x, jonny))\nforall x (Snow(x, jonny) -> Immunise(x, jonny))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Perforate(x))\nforall x (Misogynic(x) and Immunise(x, jonny) -> Perforate(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Misogynic(x))\n\nnot Immunise(gerrard, gerrard)\n\nnot Immunise(gerrard, gerrard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The evanne is teenaged. The eda is teenaged. If something is militant then it is pukka. If something pigment the eda and the eda muster the evanne then it is pinioned. If something muster the eda then the eda pyramid the evanne. If something is pukka then it pigment the evanne. If something pigment the evanne then it muster the evanne. All teenaged things are necked. If something is pukka and it muster the evanne then it is necked. If something is teenaged then it is pukka. The eda is militant.", "logic": "\nTeenaged(evanne)\nTeenaged(eda)\nforall x (Militant(x) -> Pukka(x))\nforall x (Pigment(x, eda) and Muster(eda, evanne) -> Pinioned(x))\nforall x (Muster(x, eda) -> Pyramid(eda, evanne))\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Pigment(x, evanne))\nforall x (Pigment(x, evanne) -> Muster(x, evanne))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Necked(x))\nforall x (Pukka(x) and Muster(x, evanne) -> Necked(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Pukka(x))\n\nMilitant(eda)\n\nMilitant(eda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The natalee is cosmogenic. The neddie is cosmogenic. If something is maniac then it is sarcoid. If something minister the neddie and the neddie reject the natalee then it is walleyed. If something reject the neddie then the neddie commove the natalee. If something is sarcoid then it minister the natalee. If something minister the natalee then it reject the natalee. All cosmogenic things are fascistic. If something is sarcoid and it reject the natalee then it is fascistic. If something is cosmogenic then it is sarcoid. The neddie does not see the neddie.", "logic": "\nCosmogenic(natalee)\nCosmogenic(neddie)\nforall x (Maniac(x) -> Sarcoid(x))\nforall x (Minister(x, neddie) and Reject(neddie, natalee) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Reject(x, neddie) -> Commove(neddie, natalee))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) -> Minister(x, natalee))\nforall x (Minister(x, natalee) -> Reject(x, natalee))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) -> Fascistic(x))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) and Reject(x, natalee) -> Fascistic(x))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) -> Sarcoid(x))\n\nnot Commove(neddie, neddie)\n\nnot Commove(neddie, neddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The caressa is umbilical. The dane is umbilical. If something is quaternary then it is overblown. If something repair the dane and the dane skitter the caressa then it is leonine. If something skitter the dane then the dane novate the caressa. If something is overblown then it repair the caressa. If something repair the caressa then it skitter the caressa. All umbilical things are flimsy. If something is overblown and it skitter the caressa then it is flimsy. If something is umbilical then it is overblown. The caressa novate the caressa.", "logic": "\nUmbilical(caressa)\nUmbilical(dane)\nforall x (Quaternary(x) -> Overblown(x))\nforall x (Repair(x, dane) and Skitter(dane, caressa) -> Leonine(x))\nforall x (Skitter(x, dane) -> Novate(dane, caressa))\nforall x (Overblown(x) -> Repair(x, caressa))\nforall x (Repair(x, caressa) -> Skitter(x, caressa))\nforall x (Umbilical(x) -> Flimsy(x))\nforall x (Overblown(x) and Skitter(x, caressa) -> Flimsy(x))\nforall x (Umbilical(x) -> Overblown(x))\n\nNovate(caressa, caressa)\n\nNovate(caressa, caressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The vicky is bilabial. The vicky is amitotic. The vicky is marbleized. The vicky is basinal. The vicky is volunteer. Nice things are volunteer. If something is amitotic then it is bilabial. All marbleized things are volunteer. Blue things are basinal. If the vicky is bilabial then the vicky is amitotic. If the vicky is amitotic and the vicky is basinal then the vicky is volunteer. If something is volunteer and marbleized then it is bilabial. If something is amitotic then it is basinal. The vicky is basinal.", "logic": "\nBilabial(vicky)\nAmitotic(vicky)\nMarbleized(vicky)\nBasinal(vicky)\nVolunteer(vicky)\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Marbleized(x) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Basinal(x))\nBilabial(vicky) -> Amitotic(vicky)\nAmitotic(vicky) and Basinal(vicky) -> Volunteer(vicky)\nforall x (Volunteer(x) and Marbleized(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Basinal(x))\n\nBasinal(vicky)\n\ntherefore Basinal(vicky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3305"} {"premises": "The dolora is unjointed. The dolora is underclass. The dolora is unhardened. The dolora is interim. The dolora is orangish. Nice things are orangish. If something is underclass then it is unjointed. All unhardened things are orangish. Blue things are interim. If the dolora is unjointed then the dolora is underclass. If the dolora is underclass and the dolora is interim then the dolora is orangish. If something is orangish and unhardened then it is unjointed. If something is underclass then it is interim. The dolora is not underclass.", "logic": "\nUnjointed(dolora)\nUnderclass(dolora)\nUnhardened(dolora)\nInterim(dolora)\nOrangish(dolora)\nforall x (Interim(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Interim(x))\nUnjointed(dolora) -> Underclass(dolora)\nUnderclass(dolora) and Interim(dolora) -> Orangish(dolora)\nforall x (Orangish(x) and Unhardened(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Interim(x))\n\nnot Underclass(dolora)\n\ntherefore Underclass(dolora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3305"} {"premises": "The bobine is partial. The bobine is noncaloric. The bobine is hadean. The bobine is antepartum. The bobine is bold. Nice things are bold. If something is noncaloric then it is partial. All hadean things are bold. Blue things are antepartum. If the bobine is partial then the bobine is noncaloric. If the bobine is noncaloric and the bobine is antepartum then the bobine is bold. If something is bold and hadean then it is partial. If something is noncaloric then it is antepartum. The bobine does not visit the bobine.", "logic": "\nPartial(bobine)\nNoncaloric(bobine)\nHadean(bobine)\nAntepartum(bobine)\nBold(bobine)\nforall x (Antepartum(x) -> Bold(x))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Partial(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Bold(x))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nPartial(bobine) -> Noncaloric(bobine)\nNoncaloric(bobine) and Antepartum(bobine) -> Bold(bobine)\nforall x (Bold(x) and Hadean(x) -> Partial(x))\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Antepartum(x))\n\nnot Visits(bobine, bobine)\n\nnot Visits(bobine, bobine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3305"} {"premises": "The earle is thyrotoxic. The earle is limiting. The earle is squinting. The earle is dormie. The earle is expiratory. Nice things are expiratory. If something is limiting then it is thyrotoxic. All squinting things are expiratory. Blue things are dormie. If the earle is thyrotoxic then the earle is limiting. If the earle is limiting and the earle is dormie then the earle is expiratory. If something is expiratory and squinting then it is thyrotoxic. If something is limiting then it is dormie. The earle likes the earle.", "logic": "\nThyrotoxic(earle)\nLimiting(earle)\nSquinting(earle)\nDormie(earle)\nExpiratory(earle)\nforall x (Dormie(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Thyrotoxic(x))\nforall x (Squinting(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Dormie(x))\nThyrotoxic(earle) -> Limiting(earle)\nLimiting(earle) and Dormie(earle) -> Expiratory(earle)\nforall x (Expiratory(x) and Squinting(x) -> Thyrotoxic(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Dormie(x))\n\nLikes(earle, earle)\n\nLikes(earle, earle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3305"} {"premises": "The westley yack the chanda. The chanda is frankish. If something yack the chanda and the chanda is unlighted then the chanda is roundish. If the chanda commix the westley then the chanda is barred. If something yack the westley then it commix the westley. If something is unlighted and avocado then it camp the westley. If something is frankish then it yack the westley. If something commix the chanda and the chanda is barred then it yack the chanda. The chanda is frankish.", "logic": "\nYack(westley, chanda)\nFrankish(chanda)\nforall x (Yack(x, chanda) and Unlighted(chanda) -> Roundish(chanda))\nCommix(chanda, westley) -> Barred(chanda)\nforall x (Yack(x, westley) -> Commix(x, westley))\nforall x (Unlighted(x) and Avocado(x) -> Camp(x, westley))\nforall x (Frankish(x) -> Yack(x, westley))\nforall x (Commix(x, chanda) and Barred(chanda) -> Yack(x, chanda))\n\nFrankish(chanda)\n\ntherefore Frankish(chanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The harvard auspicate the trent. The trent is bitumenoid. If something auspicate the trent and the trent is bicolor then the trent is equipped. If the trent preamble the harvard then the trent is revolved. If something auspicate the harvard then it preamble the harvard. If something is bicolor and plumy then it stipple the harvard. If something is bitumenoid then it auspicate the harvard. If something preamble the trent and the trent is revolved then it auspicate the trent. The trent is not bitumenoid.", "logic": "\nAuspicate(harvard, trent)\nBitumenoid(trent)\nforall x (Auspicate(x, trent) and Bicolor(trent) -> Equipped(trent))\nPreamble(trent, harvard) -> Revolved(trent)\nforall x (Auspicate(x, harvard) -> Preamble(x, harvard))\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Plumy(x) -> Stipple(x, harvard))\nforall x (Bitumenoid(x) -> Auspicate(x, harvard))\nforall x (Preamble(x, trent) and Revolved(trent) -> Auspicate(x, trent))\n\nnot Bitumenoid(trent)\n\ntherefore Bitumenoid(trent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The gerald personate the moria. The moria is drear. If something personate the moria and the moria is hyperbolic then the moria is epidemic. If the moria discord the gerald then the moria is nihilistic. If something personate the gerald then it discord the gerald. If something is hyperbolic and prior then it butterfly the gerald. If something is drear then it personate the gerald. If something discord the moria and the moria is nihilistic then it personate the moria. The moria personate the gerald.", "logic": "\nPersonate(gerald, moria)\nDrear(moria)\nforall x (Personate(x, moria) and Hyperbolic(moria) -> Epidemic(moria))\nDiscord(moria, gerald) -> Nihilistic(moria)\nforall x (Personate(x, gerald) -> Discord(x, gerald))\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) and Prior(x) -> Butterfly(x, gerald))\nforall x (Drear(x) -> Personate(x, gerald))\nforall x (Discord(x, moria) and Nihilistic(moria) -> Personate(x, moria))\n\nPersonate(moria, gerald)\n\nDrear(moria) and forall x (Drear(x) -> Personate(x, gerald)) -> therefore Personate(moria, gerald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The janus illumine the virge. The virge is torpid. If something illumine the virge and the virge is reactive then the virge is isomeric. If the virge brutalize the janus then the virge is glaciated. If something illumine the janus then it brutalize the janus. If something is reactive and reasonless then it heckle the janus. If something is torpid then it illumine the janus. If something brutalize the virge and the virge is glaciated then it illumine the virge. The virge does not eat the janus.", "logic": "\nIllumine(janus, virge)\nTorpid(virge)\nforall x (Illumine(x, virge) and Reactive(virge) -> Isomeric(virge))\nBrutalize(virge, janus) -> Glaciated(virge)\nforall x (Illumine(x, janus) -> Brutalize(x, janus))\nforall x (Reactive(x) and Reasonless(x) -> Heckle(x, janus))\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Illumine(x, janus))\nforall x (Brutalize(x, virge) and Glaciated(virge) -> Illumine(x, virge))\n\nnot Illumine(virge, janus)\n\nTorpid(virge) and forall x (Torpid(x) -> Illumine(x, janus)) -> therefore Illumine(virge, janus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The malinde frenchify the allah. The allah is unlaureled. If something frenchify the allah and the allah is chance then the allah is elongate. If the allah color the malinde then the allah is clarion. If something frenchify the malinde then it color the malinde. If something is chance and pyemic then it destroy the malinde. If something is unlaureled then it frenchify the malinde. If something color the allah and the allah is clarion then it frenchify the allah. The allah color the malinde.", "logic": "\nFrenchify(malinde, allah)\nUnlaureled(allah)\nforall x (Frenchify(x, allah) and Chance(allah) -> Elongate(allah))\nColor(allah, malinde) -> Clarion(allah)\nforall x (Frenchify(x, malinde) -> Color(x, malinde))\nforall x (Chance(x) and Pyemic(x) -> Destroy(x, malinde))\nforall x (Unlaureled(x) -> Frenchify(x, malinde))\nforall x (Color(x, allah) and Clarion(allah) -> Frenchify(x, allah))\n\nColor(allah, malinde)\n\nUnlaureled(allah) and forall x (Unlaureled(x) -> Frenchify(x, malinde)) -> therefore Frenchify(allah, malinde) Frenchify(allah, malinde) and forall x (Frenchify(x, malinde) -> Color(x, malinde)) -> therefore Color(allah, malinde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The sara dissatisfy the diannne. The diannne is tarry. If something dissatisfy the diannne and the diannne is habitual then the diannne is oppressed. If the diannne mudwrestle the sara then the diannne is outer. If something dissatisfy the sara then it mudwrestle the sara. If something is habitual and spellbound then it overreach the sara. If something is tarry then it dissatisfy the sara. If something mudwrestle the diannne and the diannne is outer then it dissatisfy the diannne. The diannne does not need the sara.", "logic": "\nDissatisfy(sara, diannne)\nTarry(diannne)\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, diannne) and Habitual(diannne) -> Oppressed(diannne))\nMudwrestle(diannne, sara) -> Outer(diannne)\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, sara) -> Mudwrestle(x, sara))\nforall x (Habitual(x) and Spellbound(x) -> Overreach(x, sara))\nforall x (Tarry(x) -> Dissatisfy(x, sara))\nforall x (Mudwrestle(x, diannne) and Outer(diannne) -> Dissatisfy(x, diannne))\n\nnot Mudwrestle(diannne, sara)\n\nTarry(diannne) and forall x (Tarry(x) -> Dissatisfy(x, sara)) -> therefore Dissatisfy(diannne, sara) Dissatisfy(diannne, sara) and forall x (Dissatisfy(x, sara) -> Mudwrestle(x, sara)) -> therefore Mudwrestle(diannne, sara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The gillie disrupt the jody. The jody is enwrapped. If something disrupt the jody and the jody is bestial then the jody is lifelike. If the jody numerate the gillie then the jody is ceremonial. If something disrupt the gillie then it numerate the gillie. If something is bestial and calyculate then it lactate the gillie. If something is enwrapped then it disrupt the gillie. If something numerate the jody and the jody is ceremonial then it disrupt the jody. The jody is ceremonial.", "logic": "\nDisrupt(gillie, jody)\nEnwrapped(jody)\nforall x (Disrupt(x, jody) and Bestial(jody) -> Lifelike(jody))\nNumerate(jody, gillie) -> Ceremonial(jody)\nforall x (Disrupt(x, gillie) -> Numerate(x, gillie))\nforall x (Bestial(x) and Calyculate(x) -> Lactate(x, gillie))\nforall x (Enwrapped(x) -> Disrupt(x, gillie))\nforall x (Numerate(x, jody) and Ceremonial(jody) -> Disrupt(x, jody))\n\nCeremonial(jody)\n\nEnwrapped(jody) and forall x (Enwrapped(x) -> Disrupt(x, gillie)) -> therefore Disrupt(jody, gillie) Disrupt(jody, gillie) and forall x (Disrupt(x, gillie) -> Numerate(x, gillie)) -> therefore Numerate(jody, gillie) Numerate(jody, gillie) and Numerate(jody, gillie) -> Ceremonial(jody) -> therefore Ceremonial(jody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The lisetta reseat the dalenna. The dalenna is basilar. If something reseat the dalenna and the dalenna is thrilling then the dalenna is motorized. If the dalenna date the lisetta then the dalenna is multiphase. If something reseat the lisetta then it date the lisetta. If something is thrilling and admired then it shellac the lisetta. If something is basilar then it reseat the lisetta. If something date the dalenna and the dalenna is multiphase then it reseat the dalenna. The dalenna is not multiphase.", "logic": "\nReseat(lisetta, dalenna)\nBasilar(dalenna)\nforall x (Reseat(x, dalenna) and Thrilling(dalenna) -> Motorized(dalenna))\nDate(dalenna, lisetta) -> Multiphase(dalenna)\nforall x (Reseat(x, lisetta) -> Date(x, lisetta))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) and Admired(x) -> Shellac(x, lisetta))\nforall x (Basilar(x) -> Reseat(x, lisetta))\nforall x (Date(x, dalenna) and Multiphase(dalenna) -> Reseat(x, dalenna))\n\nnot Multiphase(dalenna)\n\nBasilar(dalenna) and forall x (Basilar(x) -> Reseat(x, lisetta)) -> therefore Reseat(dalenna, lisetta) Reseat(dalenna, lisetta) and forall x (Reseat(x, lisetta) -> Date(x, lisetta)) -> therefore Date(dalenna, lisetta) Date(dalenna, lisetta) and Date(dalenna, lisetta) -> Multiphase(dalenna) -> therefore Multiphase(dalenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The lolande operate the jesse. The jesse is slimy. If something operate the jesse and the jesse is empathic then the jesse is parked. If the jesse vaccinate the lolande then the jesse is heathlike. If something operate the lolande then it vaccinate the lolande. If something is empathic and sneaking then it elucidate the lolande. If something is slimy then it operate the lolande. If something vaccinate the jesse and the jesse is heathlike then it operate the jesse. The jesse does not chase the lolande.", "logic": "\nOperate(lolande, jesse)\nSlimy(jesse)\nforall x (Operate(x, jesse) and Empathic(jesse) -> Parked(jesse))\nVaccinate(jesse, lolande) -> Heathlike(jesse)\nforall x (Operate(x, lolande) -> Vaccinate(x, lolande))\nforall x (Empathic(x) and Sneaking(x) -> Elucidate(x, lolande))\nforall x (Slimy(x) -> Operate(x, lolande))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, jesse) and Heathlike(jesse) -> Operate(x, jesse))\n\nnot Elucidate(jesse, lolande)\n\nforall x (Empathic(x) and Sneaking(x) -> Elucidate(x, lolande)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The madlin protract the cosette. The cosette is honest. If something protract the cosette and the cosette is peopled then the cosette is lowest. If the cosette happen the madlin then the cosette is parasitic. If something protract the madlin then it happen the madlin. If something is peopled and hulky then it patinize the madlin. If something is honest then it protract the madlin. If something happen the cosette and the cosette is parasitic then it protract the cosette. The madlin protract the madlin.", "logic": "\nProtract(madlin, cosette)\nHonest(cosette)\nforall x (Protract(x, cosette) and Peopled(cosette) -> Lowest(cosette))\nHappen(cosette, madlin) -> Parasitic(cosette)\nforall x (Protract(x, madlin) -> Happen(x, madlin))\nforall x (Peopled(x) and Hulky(x) -> Patinize(x, madlin))\nforall x (Honest(x) -> Protract(x, madlin))\nforall x (Happen(x, cosette) and Parasitic(cosette) -> Protract(x, cosette))\n\nProtract(madlin, madlin)\n\nforall x (Honest(x) -> Protract(x, madlin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The park plastinate the joab. The joab is erythroid. If something plastinate the joab and the joab is antitoxic then the joab is seventy. If the joab visualise the park then the joab is thwarting. If something plastinate the park then it visualise the park. If something is antitoxic and alphameric then it twinkle the park. If something is erythroid then it plastinate the park. If something visualise the joab and the joab is thwarting then it plastinate the joab. The joab is not seventy.", "logic": "\nPlastinate(park, joab)\nErythroid(joab)\nforall x (Plastinate(x, joab) and Antitoxic(joab) -> Seventy(joab))\nVisualise(joab, park) -> Thwarting(joab)\nforall x (Plastinate(x, park) -> Visualise(x, park))\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) and Alphameric(x) -> Twinkle(x, park))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) -> Plastinate(x, park))\nforall x (Visualise(x, joab) and Thwarting(joab) -> Plastinate(x, joab))\n\nnot Seventy(joab)\n\nforall x (Plastinate(x, joab) and Antitoxic(joab) -> Seventy(joab)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The philly mother the rita. The rita is dolabrate. If something mother the rita and the rita is encircling then the rita is chronic. If the rita humble the philly then the rita is montane. If something mother the philly then it humble the philly. If something is encircling and unattired then it gainsay the philly. If something is dolabrate then it mother the philly. If something humble the rita and the rita is montane then it mother the rita. The philly gainsay the philly.", "logic": "\nMother(philly, rita)\nDolabrate(rita)\nforall x (Mother(x, rita) and Encircling(rita) -> Chronic(rita))\nHumble(rita, philly) -> Montane(rita)\nforall x (Mother(x, philly) -> Humble(x, philly))\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Unattired(x) -> Gainsay(x, philly))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Mother(x, philly))\nforall x (Humble(x, rita) and Montane(rita) -> Mother(x, rita))\n\nGainsay(philly, philly)\n\nforall x (Encircling(x) and Unattired(x) -> Gainsay(x, philly)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The nil criticize the doralyn. The doralyn is drastic. If something criticize the doralyn and the doralyn is fused then the doralyn is roadless. If the doralyn peek the nil then the doralyn is orthoptic. If something criticize the nil then it peek the nil. If something is fused and barricaded then it bloviate the nil. If something is drastic then it criticize the nil. If something peek the doralyn and the doralyn is orthoptic then it criticize the doralyn. The doralyn does not need the doralyn.", "logic": "\nCriticize(nil, doralyn)\nDrastic(doralyn)\nforall x (Criticize(x, doralyn) and Fused(doralyn) -> Roadless(doralyn))\nPeek(doralyn, nil) -> Orthoptic(doralyn)\nforall x (Criticize(x, nil) -> Peek(x, nil))\nforall x (Fused(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Bloviate(x, nil))\nforall x (Drastic(x) -> Criticize(x, nil))\nforall x (Peek(x, doralyn) and Orthoptic(doralyn) -> Criticize(x, doralyn))\n\nnot Peek(doralyn, doralyn)\n\nnot Peek(doralyn, doralyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The valdemar devil the magnum. The magnum is slithering. If something devil the magnum and the magnum is downstairs then the magnum is disabled. If the magnum relieve the valdemar then the magnum is shingly. If something devil the valdemar then it relieve the valdemar. If something is downstairs and denotive then it represent the valdemar. If something is slithering then it devil the valdemar. If something relieve the magnum and the magnum is shingly then it devil the magnum. The magnum is downstairs.", "logic": "\nDevil(valdemar, magnum)\nSlithering(magnum)\nforall x (Devil(x, magnum) and Downstairs(magnum) -> Disabled(magnum))\nRelieve(magnum, valdemar) -> Shingly(magnum)\nforall x (Devil(x, valdemar) -> Relieve(x, valdemar))\nforall x (Downstairs(x) and Denotive(x) -> Represent(x, valdemar))\nforall x (Slithering(x) -> Devil(x, valdemar))\nforall x (Relieve(x, magnum) and Shingly(magnum) -> Devil(x, magnum))\n\nDownstairs(magnum)\n\nDownstairs(magnum) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The devan decalcify the calley. The calley is appointive. If something decalcify the calley and the calley is suited then the calley is forbearing. If the calley dissonate the devan then the calley is tenor. If something decalcify the devan then it dissonate the devan. If something is suited and squamulose then it intone the devan. If something is appointive then it decalcify the devan. If something dissonate the calley and the calley is tenor then it decalcify the calley. The devan is not forbearing.", "logic": "\nDecalcify(devan, calley)\nAppointive(calley)\nforall x (Decalcify(x, calley) and Suited(calley) -> Forbearing(calley))\nDissonate(calley, devan) -> Tenor(calley)\nforall x (Decalcify(x, devan) -> Dissonate(x, devan))\nforall x (Suited(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Intone(x, devan))\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Decalcify(x, devan))\nforall x (Dissonate(x, calley) and Tenor(calley) -> Decalcify(x, calley))\n\nnot Forbearing(devan)\n\nnot Forbearing(devan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The stephana unleash the kalman. The kalman is ultrasonic. If something unleash the kalman and the kalman is sexual then the kalman is meandering. If the kalman distress the stephana then the kalman is stenosed. If something unleash the stephana then it distress the stephana. If something is sexual and adactylous then it spelunk the stephana. If something is ultrasonic then it unleash the stephana. If something distress the kalman and the kalman is stenosed then it unleash the kalman. The stephana distress the kalman.", "logic": "\nUnleash(stephana, kalman)\nUltrasonic(kalman)\nforall x (Unleash(x, kalman) and Sexual(kalman) -> Meandering(kalman))\nDistress(kalman, stephana) -> Stenosed(kalman)\nforall x (Unleash(x, stephana) -> Distress(x, stephana))\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Adactylous(x) -> Spelunk(x, stephana))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) -> Unleash(x, stephana))\nforall x (Distress(x, kalman) and Stenosed(kalman) -> Unleash(x, kalman))\n\nDistress(stephana, kalman)\n\nDistress(stephana, kalman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-454"} {"premises": "The hope is versatile. Big, thoriated people are dished. If someone is thoriated and optimal then they are versatile. All thoriated, optimal people are not isomorphic. All versatile people are isomorphic. If someone is optimal and thoriated then they are isomorphic. All isomorphic people are thoriated. Red, versatile people are thoriated. If the hope is isomorphic then the hope is versatile. The hope is versatile.", "logic": "\nVersatile(hope)\nforall x (Versatile(x) and Thoriated(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Optimal(x) -> Versatile(x))\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Optimal(x) -> not Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Versatile(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Optimal(x) and Thoriated(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) and Versatile(x) -> Thoriated(x))\nIsomorphic(hope) -> Versatile(hope)\n\nVersatile(hope)\n\ntherefore Versatile(hope)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The spiros is regulation. Big, adamantine people are finer. If someone is adamantine and disposed then they are regulation. All adamantine, disposed people are not saleable. All regulation people are saleable. If someone is disposed and adamantine then they are saleable. All saleable people are adamantine. Red, regulation people are adamantine. If the spiros is saleable then the spiros is regulation. The spiros is not regulation.", "logic": "\nRegulation(spiros)\nforall x (Regulation(x) and Adamantine(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) and Disposed(x) -> Regulation(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) and Disposed(x) -> not Saleable(x))\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> Saleable(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Adamantine(x) -> Saleable(x))\nforall x (Saleable(x) -> Adamantine(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) and Regulation(x) -> Adamantine(x))\nSaleable(spiros) -> Regulation(spiros)\n\nnot Regulation(spiros)\n\ntherefore Regulation(spiros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The moselle is unordered. Big, separate people are wrongful. If someone is separate and floral then they are unordered. All separate, floral people are not ornamental. All unordered people are ornamental. If someone is floral and separate then they are ornamental. All ornamental people are separate. Red, unordered people are separate. If the moselle is ornamental then the moselle is unordered. The moselle is ornamental.", "logic": "\nUnordered(moselle)\nforall x (Unordered(x) and Separate(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Separate(x) and Floral(x) -> Unordered(x))\nforall x (Separate(x) and Floral(x) -> not Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Floral(x) and Separate(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Ornamental(x) -> Separate(x))\nforall x (Wrongful(x) and Unordered(x) -> Separate(x))\nOrnamental(moselle) -> Unordered(moselle)\n\nOrnamental(moselle)\n\nUnordered(moselle) and forall x (Unordered(x) -> Ornamental(x)) -> therefore Ornamental(moselle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The jake is calcific. Big, concentric people are urbanised. If someone is concentric and archaic then they are calcific. All concentric, archaic people are not childless. All calcific people are childless. If someone is archaic and concentric then they are childless. All childless people are concentric. Red, calcific people are concentric. If the jake is childless then the jake is calcific. The jake is not childless.", "logic": "\nCalcific(jake)\nforall x (Calcific(x) and Concentric(x) -> Urbanised(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) and Archaic(x) -> Calcific(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) and Archaic(x) -> not Childless(x))\nforall x (Calcific(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Archaic(x) and Concentric(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Concentric(x))\nforall x (Urbanised(x) and Calcific(x) -> Concentric(x))\nChildless(jake) -> Calcific(jake)\n\nnot Childless(jake)\n\nCalcific(jake) and forall x (Calcific(x) -> Childless(x)) -> therefore Childless(jake)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The sidnee is unapparent. Big, overactive people are observant. If someone is overactive and presumable then they are unapparent. All overactive, presumable people are not donnian. All unapparent people are donnian. If someone is presumable and overactive then they are donnian. All donnian people are overactive. Red, unapparent people are overactive. If the sidnee is donnian then the sidnee is unapparent. The sidnee is overactive.", "logic": "\nUnapparent(sidnee)\nforall x (Unapparent(x) and Overactive(x) -> Observant(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Presumable(x) -> Unapparent(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Presumable(x) -> not Donnian(x))\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Presumable(x) and Overactive(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Donnian(x) -> Overactive(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Overactive(x))\nDonnian(sidnee) -> Unapparent(sidnee)\n\nOveractive(sidnee)\n\nUnapparent(sidnee) and forall x (Unapparent(x) -> Donnian(x)) -> therefore Donnian(sidnee) Donnian(sidnee) and forall x (Donnian(x) -> Overactive(x)) -> therefore Overactive(sidnee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The niall is panoplied. Big, shed people are hybrid. If someone is shed and sloped then they are panoplied. All shed, sloped people are not skim. All panoplied people are skim. If someone is sloped and shed then they are skim. All skim people are shed. Red, panoplied people are shed. If the niall is skim then the niall is panoplied. The niall is not shed.", "logic": "\nPanoplied(niall)\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and Shed(x) -> Hybrid(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) and Sloped(x) -> Panoplied(x))\nforall x (Shed(x) and Sloped(x) -> not Skim(x))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> Skim(x))\nforall x (Sloped(x) and Shed(x) -> Skim(x))\nforall x (Skim(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) and Panoplied(x) -> Shed(x))\nSkim(niall) -> Panoplied(niall)\n\nnot Shed(niall)\n\nPanoplied(niall) and forall x (Panoplied(x) -> Skim(x)) -> therefore Skim(niall) Skim(niall) and forall x (Skim(x) -> Shed(x)) -> therefore Shed(niall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The matthaeus is xcvi. Big, genovese people are seamanlike. If someone is genovese and rose then they are xcvi. All genovese, rose people are not lapidary. All xcvi people are lapidary. If someone is rose and genovese then they are lapidary. All lapidary people are genovese. Red, xcvi people are genovese. If the matthaeus is lapidary then the matthaeus is xcvi. The matthaeus is seamanlike.", "logic": "\nXcvi(matthaeus)\nforall x (Xcvi(x) and Genovese(x) -> Seamanlike(x))\nforall x (Genovese(x) and Rose(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Genovese(x) and Rose(x) -> not Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Rose(x) and Genovese(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Genovese(x))\nforall x (Seamanlike(x) and Xcvi(x) -> Genovese(x))\nLapidary(matthaeus) -> Xcvi(matthaeus)\n\nSeamanlike(matthaeus)\n\nXcvi(matthaeus) and forall x (Xcvi(x) -> Lapidary(x)) -> therefore Lapidary(matthaeus) Lapidary(matthaeus) and forall x (Lapidary(x) -> Genovese(x)) -> therefore Genovese(matthaeus) Xcvi(matthaeus) and Genovese(matthaeus) and forall x (Xcvi(x) and Genovese(x) -> Seamanlike(x)) -> therefore Seamanlike(matthaeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The willamina is anginal. Big, goalless people are undulatory. If someone is goalless and divalent then they are anginal. All goalless, divalent people are not clayey. All anginal people are clayey. If someone is divalent and goalless then they are clayey. All clayey people are goalless. Red, anginal people are goalless. If the willamina is clayey then the willamina is anginal. The willamina is not undulatory.", "logic": "\nAnginal(willamina)\nforall x (Anginal(x) and Goalless(x) -> Undulatory(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) and Divalent(x) -> Anginal(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) and Divalent(x) -> not Clayey(x))\nforall x (Anginal(x) -> Clayey(x))\nforall x (Divalent(x) and Goalless(x) -> Clayey(x))\nforall x (Clayey(x) -> Goalless(x))\nforall x (Undulatory(x) and Anginal(x) -> Goalless(x))\nClayey(willamina) -> Anginal(willamina)\n\nnot Undulatory(willamina)\n\nAnginal(willamina) and forall x (Anginal(x) -> Clayey(x)) -> therefore Clayey(willamina) Clayey(willamina) and forall x (Clayey(x) -> Goalless(x)) -> therefore Goalless(willamina) Anginal(willamina) and Goalless(willamina) and forall x (Anginal(x) and Goalless(x) -> Undulatory(x)) -> therefore Undulatory(willamina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The hassan is migratory. Big, opponent people are rarified. If someone is opponent and injured then they are migratory. All opponent, injured people are not unmelted. All migratory people are unmelted. If someone is injured and opponent then they are unmelted. All unmelted people are opponent. Red, migratory people are opponent. If the hassan is unmelted then the hassan is migratory. The hassan does not like the hassan.", "logic": "\nMigratory(hassan)\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Opponent(x) -> Rarified(x))\nforall x (Opponent(x) and Injured(x) -> Migratory(x))\nforall x (Opponent(x) and Injured(x) -> not Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Injured(x) and Opponent(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Unmelted(x) -> Opponent(x))\nforall x (Rarified(x) and Migratory(x) -> Opponent(x))\nUnmelted(hassan) -> Migratory(hassan)\n\nnot Likes(hassan, hassan)\n\nnot Likes(hassan, hassan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The hartwell is judgmental. Big, alright people are elusive. If someone is alright and burred then they are judgmental. All alright, burred people are not ethical. All judgmental people are ethical. If someone is burred and alright then they are ethical. All ethical people are alright. Red, judgmental people are alright. If the hartwell is ethical then the hartwell is judgmental. The hartwell needs the hartwell.", "logic": "\nJudgmental(hartwell)\nforall x (Judgmental(x) and Alright(x) -> Elusive(x))\nforall x (Alright(x) and Burred(x) -> Judgmental(x))\nforall x (Alright(x) and Burred(x) -> not Ethical(x))\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Ethical(x))\nforall x (Burred(x) and Alright(x) -> Ethical(x))\nforall x (Ethical(x) -> Alright(x))\nforall x (Elusive(x) and Judgmental(x) -> Alright(x))\nEthical(hartwell) -> Judgmental(hartwell)\n\nNeeds(hartwell, hartwell)\n\nNeeds(hartwell, hartwell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The zia is watchful. Big, smoking people are imperative. If someone is smoking and freehanded then they are watchful. All smoking, freehanded people are not seraphic. All watchful people are seraphic. If someone is freehanded and smoking then they are seraphic. All seraphic people are smoking. Red, watchful people are smoking. If the zia is seraphic then the zia is watchful. The zia is not freehanded.", "logic": "\nWatchful(zia)\nforall x (Watchful(x) and Smoking(x) -> Imperative(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) and Freehanded(x) -> Watchful(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) and Freehanded(x) -> not Seraphic(x))\nforall x (Watchful(x) -> Seraphic(x))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) and Smoking(x) -> Seraphic(x))\nforall x (Seraphic(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Imperative(x) and Watchful(x) -> Smoking(x))\nSeraphic(zia) -> Watchful(zia)\n\nnot Freehanded(zia)\n\nnot Freehanded(zia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "The alberta is valued. Big, quadratic people are queenlike. If someone is quadratic and foolhardy then they are valued. All quadratic, foolhardy people are not volumed. All valued people are volumed. If someone is foolhardy and quadratic then they are volumed. All volumed people are quadratic. Red, valued people are quadratic. If the alberta is volumed then the alberta is valued. The alberta sees the alberta.", "logic": "\nValued(alberta)\nforall x (Valued(x) and Quadratic(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) and Foolhardy(x) -> Valued(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) and Foolhardy(x) -> not Volumed(x))\nforall x (Valued(x) -> Volumed(x))\nforall x (Foolhardy(x) and Quadratic(x) -> Volumed(x))\nforall x (Volumed(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Queenlike(x) and Valued(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nVolumed(alberta) -> Valued(alberta)\n\nSees(alberta, alberta)\n\nSees(alberta, alberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-648"} {"premises": "Wilburt is rivalrous. Wilburt is unmelted. Wilburt is restless. Wilburt is monthlong. Wilburt is cilial. Wilburt is gauntleted. Wilburt is chequered. Wood is rivalrous. Wood is unmelted. Wood is restless. Wood is monthlong. Wood is cilial. Wood is gauntleted. Wood is chequered. If Wood is chequered then Wood is unmelted. Wilburt is rivalrous.", "logic": "\nRivalrous(wilburt)\nUnmelted(wilburt)\nRestless(wilburt)\nMonthlong(wilburt)\nCilial(wilburt)\nGauntleted(wilburt)\nChequered(wilburt)\nRivalrous(wood)\nUnmelted(wood)\nRestless(wood)\nMonthlong(wood)\nCilial(wood)\nGauntleted(wood)\nChequered(wood)\nChequered(wood) -> Unmelted(wood)\n\nRivalrous(wilburt)\n\ntherefore Rivalrous(wilburt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3803"} {"premises": "Hagan is endogenic. Hagan is glum. Hagan is coaxing. Hagan is adventive. Hagan is thoughtful. Hagan is ridged. Hagan is dandified. Rozele is endogenic. Rozele is glum. Rozele is coaxing. Rozele is adventive. Rozele is thoughtful. Rozele is ridged. Rozele is dandified. If Rozele is dandified then Rozele is glum. Hagan is not adventive.", "logic": "\nEndogenic(hagan)\nGlum(hagan)\nCoaxing(hagan)\nAdventive(hagan)\nThoughtful(hagan)\nRidged(hagan)\nDandified(hagan)\nEndogenic(rozele)\nGlum(rozele)\nCoaxing(rozele)\nAdventive(rozele)\nThoughtful(rozele)\nRidged(rozele)\nDandified(rozele)\nDandified(rozele) -> Glum(rozele)\n\nnot Adventive(hagan)\n\ntherefore Adventive(hagan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3803"} {"premises": "Neel is stoppable. All worthful things are tiled. All vermilion, stoppable things are multiphase. If Neel is cornish and Neel is worthful then Neel is vermilion. White, stoppable things are worthful. If Neel is not baccate then Neel is not worthful. All stoppable things are cornish. Neel is stoppable.", "logic": "\nStoppable(neel)\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> Tiled(x))\nforall x (Vermilion(x) and Stoppable(x) -> Multiphase(x))\nCornish(neel) and Worthful(neel) -> Vermilion(neel)\nforall x (Cornish(x) and Stoppable(x) -> Worthful(x))\nnot Baccate(neel) -> not Worthful(neel)\nforall x (Stoppable(x) -> Cornish(x))\n\nStoppable(neel)\n\ntherefore Stoppable(neel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Jenna is shagged. All natal things are economical. All mandaean, shagged things are unreduced. If Jenna is tuneless and Jenna is natal then Jenna is mandaean. White, shagged things are natal. If Jenna is not appointive then Jenna is not natal. All shagged things are tuneless. Jenna is not shagged.", "logic": "\nShagged(jenna)\nforall x (Natal(x) -> Economical(x))\nforall x (Mandaean(x) and Shagged(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nTuneless(jenna) and Natal(jenna) -> Mandaean(jenna)\nforall x (Tuneless(x) and Shagged(x) -> Natal(x))\nnot Appointive(jenna) -> not Natal(jenna)\nforall x (Shagged(x) -> Tuneless(x))\n\nnot Shagged(jenna)\n\ntherefore Shagged(jenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Nunzio is acetonic. All proximal things are dysphoric. All nautical, acetonic things are gutsy. If Nunzio is predacious and Nunzio is proximal then Nunzio is nautical. White, acetonic things are proximal. If Nunzio is not huxleyan then Nunzio is not proximal. All acetonic things are predacious. Nunzio is predacious.", "logic": "\nAcetonic(nunzio)\nforall x (Proximal(x) -> Dysphoric(x))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and Acetonic(x) -> Gutsy(x))\nPredacious(nunzio) and Proximal(nunzio) -> Nautical(nunzio)\nforall x (Predacious(x) and Acetonic(x) -> Proximal(x))\nnot Huxleyan(nunzio) -> not Proximal(nunzio)\nforall x (Acetonic(x) -> Predacious(x))\n\nPredacious(nunzio)\n\nAcetonic(nunzio) and forall x (Acetonic(x) -> Predacious(x)) -> therefore Predacious(nunzio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Katharine is congruent. All digressive things are toiling. All subscribed, congruent things are olivelike. If Katharine is spayed and Katharine is digressive then Katharine is subscribed. White, congruent things are digressive. If Katharine is not convolute then Katharine is not digressive. All congruent things are spayed. Katharine is not spayed.", "logic": "\nCongruent(katharine)\nforall x (Digressive(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Subscribed(x) and Congruent(x) -> Olivelike(x))\nSpayed(katharine) and Digressive(katharine) -> Subscribed(katharine)\nforall x (Spayed(x) and Congruent(x) -> Digressive(x))\nnot Convolute(katharine) -> not Digressive(katharine)\nforall x (Congruent(x) -> Spayed(x))\n\nnot Spayed(katharine)\n\nCongruent(katharine) and forall x (Congruent(x) -> Spayed(x)) -> therefore Spayed(katharine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Mohamad is condolent. All overlooked things are sinuous. All sublimated, condolent things are derived. If Mohamad is waste and Mohamad is overlooked then Mohamad is sublimated. White, condolent things are overlooked. If Mohamad is not iranian then Mohamad is not overlooked. All condolent things are waste. Mohamad is overlooked.", "logic": "\nCondolent(mohamad)\nforall x (Overlooked(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) and Condolent(x) -> Derived(x))\nWaste(mohamad) and Overlooked(mohamad) -> Sublimated(mohamad)\nforall x (Waste(x) and Condolent(x) -> Overlooked(x))\nnot Iranian(mohamad) -> not Overlooked(mohamad)\nforall x (Condolent(x) -> Waste(x))\n\nOverlooked(mohamad)\n\nCondolent(mohamad) and forall x (Condolent(x) -> Waste(x)) -> therefore Waste(mohamad) Waste(mohamad) and Condolent(mohamad) and forall x (Waste(x) and Condolent(x) -> Overlooked(x)) -> therefore Overlooked(mohamad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Stella is corneal. All crookback things are fungous. All dissipated, corneal things are antiblack. If Stella is carthusian and Stella is crookback then Stella is dissipated. White, corneal things are crookback. If Stella is not mannish then Stella is not crookback. All corneal things are carthusian. Stella is not crookback.", "logic": "\nCorneal(stella)\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Fungous(x))\nforall x (Dissipated(x) and Corneal(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nCarthusian(stella) and Crookback(stella) -> Dissipated(stella)\nforall x (Carthusian(x) and Corneal(x) -> Crookback(x))\nnot Mannish(stella) -> not Crookback(stella)\nforall x (Corneal(x) -> Carthusian(x))\n\nnot Crookback(stella)\n\nCorneal(stella) and forall x (Corneal(x) -> Carthusian(x)) -> therefore Carthusian(stella) Carthusian(stella) and Corneal(stella) and forall x (Carthusian(x) and Corneal(x) -> Crookback(x)) -> therefore Crookback(stella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Goober is compounded. All pondering things are perceptual. All aural, compounded things are medial. If Goober is antecedent and Goober is pondering then Goober is aural. White, compounded things are pondering. If Goober is not fickle then Goober is not pondering. All compounded things are antecedent. Goober is perceptual.", "logic": "\nCompounded(goober)\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> Perceptual(x))\nforall x (Aural(x) and Compounded(x) -> Medial(x))\nAntecedent(goober) and Pondering(goober) -> Aural(goober)\nforall x (Antecedent(x) and Compounded(x) -> Pondering(x))\nnot Fickle(goober) -> not Pondering(goober)\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> Antecedent(x))\n\nPerceptual(goober)\n\nCompounded(goober) and forall x (Compounded(x) -> Antecedent(x)) -> therefore Antecedent(goober) Antecedent(goober) and Compounded(goober) and forall x (Antecedent(x) and Compounded(x) -> Pondering(x)) -> therefore Pondering(goober) Pondering(goober) and forall x (Pondering(x) -> Perceptual(x)) -> therefore Perceptual(goober)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "Lyndsie is sprigged. All polished things are initiatory. All tripartite, sprigged things are throated. If Lyndsie is checked and Lyndsie is polished then Lyndsie is tripartite. White, sprigged things are polished. If Lyndsie is not golden then Lyndsie is not polished. All sprigged things are checked. Lyndsie is not tripartite.", "logic": "\nSprigged(lyndsie)\nforall x (Polished(x) -> Initiatory(x))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Throated(x))\nChecked(lyndsie) and Polished(lyndsie) -> Tripartite(lyndsie)\nforall x (Checked(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Polished(x))\nnot Golden(lyndsie) -> not Polished(lyndsie)\nforall x (Sprigged(x) -> Checked(x))\n\nnot Tripartite(lyndsie)\n\nSprigged(lyndsie) and forall x (Sprigged(x) -> Checked(x)) -> therefore Checked(lyndsie) Sprigged(lyndsie) and forall x (Sprigged(x) -> Checked(x)) -> therefore Checked(lyndsie) Checked(lyndsie) and Sprigged(lyndsie) and forall x (Checked(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Polished(x)) -> therefore Polished(lyndsie) Checked(lyndsie) and Polished(lyndsie) and Checked(lyndsie) and Polished(lyndsie) -> Tripartite(lyndsie) -> therefore Tripartite(lyndsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1266"} {"premises": "The carmel is yawning. The gunther does not visit the teddie. The teddie shoe the gunther. If the teddie is not damp and the teddie is not yawning then the teddie shoe the carmel. If someone shoe the gunther then they like the teddie. If someone shoe the carmel then they are webby. The gunther does not visit the teddie.", "logic": "\nYawning(carmel)\nnot Stash(gunther, teddie)\nShoe(teddie, gunther)\nnot Damp(teddie) and not Yawning(teddie) -> Shoe(teddie, carmel)\nforall x (Shoe(x, gunther) -> Shoe(x, teddie))\nforall x (Shoe(x, carmel) -> Webby(x))\n\nnot Stash(gunther, teddie)\n\ntherefore not Stash(gunther, teddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "The alina is jawless. The lura does not visit the mirabella. The mirabella maledict the lura. If the mirabella is not nazarene and the mirabella is not jawless then the mirabella maledict the alina. If someone maledict the lura then they like the mirabella. If someone maledict the alina then they are doglike. The mirabella does not like the lura.", "logic": "\nJawless(alina)\nnot Junketeer(lura, mirabella)\nMaledict(mirabella, lura)\nnot Nazarene(mirabella) and not Jawless(mirabella) -> Maledict(mirabella, alina)\nforall x (Maledict(x, lura) -> Maledict(x, mirabella))\nforall x (Maledict(x, alina) -> Doglike(x))\n\nnot Maledict(mirabella, lura)\n\ntherefore Maledict(mirabella, lura)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "The donald is whippy. The elita does not visit the marji. The marji frizzle the elita. If the marji is not unnoticed and the marji is not whippy then the marji frizzle the donald. If someone frizzle the elita then they like the marji. If someone frizzle the donald then they are unspoken. The marji frizzle the marji.", "logic": "\nWhippy(donald)\nnot Mingle(elita, marji)\nFrizzle(marji, elita)\nnot Unnoticed(marji) and not Whippy(marji) -> Frizzle(marji, donald)\nforall x (Frizzle(x, elita) -> Frizzle(x, marji))\nforall x (Frizzle(x, donald) -> Unspoken(x))\n\nFrizzle(marji, marji)\n\nFrizzle(marji, elita) and forall x (Frizzle(x, elita) -> Frizzle(x, marji)) -> therefore Frizzle(marji, marji)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "The amabel is jittering. The caroleen does not visit the hollyanne. The hollyanne postpone the caroleen. If the hollyanne is not caloric and the hollyanne is not jittering then the hollyanne postpone the amabel. If someone postpone the caroleen then they like the hollyanne. If someone postpone the amabel then they are objective. The hollyanne does not like the hollyanne.", "logic": "\nJittering(amabel)\nnot Deplumate(caroleen, hollyanne)\nPostpone(hollyanne, caroleen)\nnot Caloric(hollyanne) and not Jittering(hollyanne) -> Postpone(hollyanne, amabel)\nforall x (Postpone(x, caroleen) -> Postpone(x, hollyanne))\nforall x (Postpone(x, amabel) -> Objective(x))\n\nnot Postpone(hollyanne, hollyanne)\n\nPostpone(hollyanne, caroleen) and forall x (Postpone(x, caroleen) -> Postpone(x, hollyanne)) -> therefore Postpone(hollyanne, hollyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "The elisabeth is monacan. The love does not visit the netty. The netty sideline the love. If the netty is not renowned and the netty is not monacan then the netty sideline the elisabeth. If someone sideline the love then they like the netty. If someone sideline the elisabeth then they are gambian. The love is not gambian.", "logic": "\nMonacan(elisabeth)\nnot Elbow(love, netty)\nSideline(netty, love)\nnot Renowned(netty) and not Monacan(netty) -> Sideline(netty, elisabeth)\nforall x (Sideline(x, love) -> Sideline(x, netty))\nforall x (Sideline(x, elisabeth) -> Gambian(x))\n\nnot Gambian(love)\n\nforall x (Sideline(x, elisabeth) -> Gambian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "The forrester is subjective. The griselda does not visit the rafael. The rafael bivouac the griselda. If the rafael is not slatey and the rafael is not subjective then the rafael bivouac the forrester. If someone bivouac the griselda then they like the rafael. If someone bivouac the forrester then they are subscribed. The rafael is subscribed.", "logic": "\nSubjective(forrester)\nnot Refinish(griselda, rafael)\nBivouac(rafael, griselda)\nnot Slatey(rafael) and not Subjective(rafael) -> Bivouac(rafael, forrester)\nforall x (Bivouac(x, griselda) -> Bivouac(x, rafael))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, forrester) -> Subscribed(x))\n\nSubscribed(rafael)\n\nforall x (Bivouac(x, forrester) -> Subscribed(x)) <- not Slatey(rafael) and not Subjective(rafael) -> Bivouac(rafael, forrester) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "The cynthea is impatient. The emmalynne does not visit the reena. The reena field the emmalynne. If the reena is not honeyed and the reena is not impatient then the reena field the cynthea. If someone field the emmalynne then they like the reena. If someone field the cynthea then they are sensible. The reena does not visit the emmalynne.", "logic": "\nImpatient(cynthea)\nnot Sway(emmalynne, reena)\nField(reena, emmalynne)\nnot Honeyed(reena) and not Impatient(reena) -> Field(reena, cynthea)\nforall x (Field(x, emmalynne) -> Field(x, reena))\nforall x (Field(x, cynthea) -> Sensible(x))\n\nnot Sway(reena, emmalynne)\n\nnot Sway(reena, emmalynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "The adelle is convex. The nerissa does not visit the taddeo. The taddeo outpace the nerissa. If the taddeo is not stinting and the taddeo is not convex then the taddeo outpace the adelle. If someone outpace the nerissa then they like the taddeo. If someone outpace the adelle then they are pulverized. The nerissa is stinting.", "logic": "\nConvex(adelle)\nnot Cart(nerissa, taddeo)\nOutpace(taddeo, nerissa)\nnot Stinting(taddeo) and not Convex(taddeo) -> Outpace(taddeo, adelle)\nforall x (Outpace(x, nerissa) -> Outpace(x, taddeo))\nforall x (Outpace(x, adelle) -> Pulverized(x))\n\nStinting(nerissa)\n\nStinting(nerissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-700"} {"premises": "Heddi is sinhala. Heddi is nidifugous. Heddi is legion. Heddi is budding. Dorice is sinhala. Dorice is ecologic. Dorice is nidifugous. Dorice is legion. Dorice is manual. Dorice is budding. Jeff is dense. Jeff is sinhala. Jeff is ecologic. Jeff is nidifugous. Jeff is legion. Jeff is manual. Quiet things are ecologic. If something is legion then it is sinhala. Round things are sinhala. Round things are legion. If Heddi is budding and Heddi is nidifugous then Heddi is legion. Round things are dense. Big things are legion. All budding things are nidifugous. Dorice is legion.", "logic": "\nSinhala(heddi)\nNidifugous(heddi)\nLegion(heddi)\nBudding(heddi)\nSinhala(dorice)\nEcologic(dorice)\nNidifugous(dorice)\nLegion(dorice)\nManual(dorice)\nBudding(dorice)\nDense(jeff)\nSinhala(jeff)\nEcologic(jeff)\nNidifugous(jeff)\nLegion(jeff)\nManual(jeff)\nforall x (Legion(x) -> Ecologic(x))\nforall x (Legion(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Legion(x))\nBudding(heddi) and Nidifugous(heddi) -> Legion(heddi)\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Dense(x))\nforall x (Dense(x) -> Legion(x))\nforall x (Budding(x) -> Nidifugous(x))\n\nLegion(dorice)\n\ntherefore Legion(dorice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1744"} {"premises": "Irwin is catarrhine. Irwin is zesty. Irwin is dishonored. Irwin is smelling. Aloise is catarrhine. Aloise is slovenian. Aloise is zesty. Aloise is dishonored. Aloise is goethian. Aloise is smelling. Cariotta is unprepared. Cariotta is catarrhine. Cariotta is slovenian. Cariotta is zesty. Cariotta is dishonored. Cariotta is goethian. Quiet things are slovenian. If something is dishonored then it is catarrhine. Round things are catarrhine. Round things are dishonored. If Irwin is smelling and Irwin is zesty then Irwin is dishonored. Round things are unprepared. Big things are dishonored. All smelling things are zesty. Cariotta is not catarrhine.", "logic": "\nCatarrhine(irwin)\nZesty(irwin)\nDishonored(irwin)\nSmelling(irwin)\nCatarrhine(aloise)\nSlovenian(aloise)\nZesty(aloise)\nDishonored(aloise)\nGoethian(aloise)\nSmelling(aloise)\nUnprepared(cariotta)\nCatarrhine(cariotta)\nSlovenian(cariotta)\nZesty(cariotta)\nDishonored(cariotta)\nGoethian(cariotta)\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Slovenian(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nSmelling(irwin) and Zesty(irwin) -> Dishonored(irwin)\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Smelling(x) -> Zesty(x))\n\nnot Catarrhine(cariotta)\n\ntherefore Catarrhine(cariotta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1744"} {"premises": "Franky is unconfused. Franky is sanctified. Franky is isomorphic. Franky is verboten. Anallise is unconfused. Anallise is downcast. Anallise is sanctified. Anallise is isomorphic. Anallise is acceptable. Anallise is verboten. Fawna is unadapted. Fawna is unconfused. Fawna is downcast. Fawna is sanctified. Fawna is isomorphic. Fawna is acceptable. Quiet things are downcast. If something is isomorphic then it is unconfused. Round things are unconfused. Round things are isomorphic. If Franky is verboten and Franky is sanctified then Franky is isomorphic. Round things are unadapted. Big things are isomorphic. All verboten things are sanctified. Franky is not unadapted.", "logic": "\nUnconfused(franky)\nSanctified(franky)\nIsomorphic(franky)\nVerboten(franky)\nUnconfused(anallise)\nDowncast(anallise)\nSanctified(anallise)\nIsomorphic(anallise)\nAcceptable(anallise)\nVerboten(anallise)\nUnadapted(fawna)\nUnconfused(fawna)\nDowncast(fawna)\nSanctified(fawna)\nIsomorphic(fawna)\nAcceptable(fawna)\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Downcast(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Unconfused(x))\nforall x (Acceptable(x) -> Unconfused(x))\nforall x (Acceptable(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nVerboten(franky) and Sanctified(franky) -> Isomorphic(franky)\nforall x (Acceptable(x) -> Unadapted(x))\nforall x (Unadapted(x) -> Isomorphic(x))\nforall x (Verboten(x) -> Sanctified(x))\n\nnot Unadapted(franky)\n\nforall x (Acceptable(x) -> Unadapted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1744"} {"premises": "Charlene is thirsty. Charlene is umber. Charlene is hematal. Charlene is satyrical. Benetta is thirsty. Benetta is residuary. Benetta is umber. Benetta is hematal. Benetta is packable. Benetta is satyrical. Madalyn is swarthy. Madalyn is thirsty. Madalyn is residuary. Madalyn is umber. Madalyn is hematal. Madalyn is packable. Quiet things are residuary. If something is hematal then it is thirsty. Round things are thirsty. Round things are hematal. If Charlene is satyrical and Charlene is umber then Charlene is hematal. Round things are swarthy. Big things are hematal. All satyrical things are umber. Madalyn is satyrical.", "logic": "\nThirsty(charlene)\nUmber(charlene)\nHematal(charlene)\nSatyrical(charlene)\nThirsty(benetta)\nResiduary(benetta)\nUmber(benetta)\nHematal(benetta)\nPackable(benetta)\nSatyrical(benetta)\nSwarthy(madalyn)\nThirsty(madalyn)\nResiduary(madalyn)\nUmber(madalyn)\nHematal(madalyn)\nPackable(madalyn)\nforall x (Hematal(x) -> Residuary(x))\nforall x (Hematal(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Packable(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Packable(x) -> Hematal(x))\nSatyrical(charlene) and Umber(charlene) -> Hematal(charlene)\nforall x (Packable(x) -> Swarthy(x))\nforall x (Swarthy(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Satyrical(x) -> Umber(x))\n\nSatyrical(madalyn)\n\nSatyrical(madalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1744"} {"premises": "The patsy is not lacking. The patsy is easy. The patsy is suspect. The patsy is not stressed. The patsy is isotopic. Cold people are isotopic. All lacking people are not isotopic. If the patsy is lacking then the patsy is stressed. All lacking people are stressed. If someone is lacking and not isotopic then they are stressed. If someone is stressed and not isotopic then they are suspect. If someone is stressed and isotopic then they are not suspect. If the patsy is not stressed and the patsy is not lacking then the patsy is suspect. The patsy is not lacking.", "logic": "\nnot Lacking(patsy)\nEasy(patsy)\nSuspect(patsy)\nnot Stressed(patsy)\nIsotopic(patsy)\nforall x (Easy(x) -> Isotopic(x))\nforall x (Lacking(x) -> not Isotopic(x))\nLacking(patsy) -> Stressed(patsy)\nforall x (Lacking(x) -> Stressed(x))\nforall x (Lacking(x) and not Isotopic(x) -> Stressed(x))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and not Isotopic(x) -> Suspect(x))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and Isotopic(x) -> not Suspect(x))\nnot Stressed(patsy) and not Lacking(patsy) -> Suspect(patsy)\n\nnot Lacking(patsy)\n\ntherefore not Lacking(patsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4914"} {"premises": "The fawn is not faded. The fawn is closed. The fawn is exhaustive. The fawn is not tinned. The fawn is curricular. Cold people are curricular. All faded people are not curricular. If the fawn is faded then the fawn is tinned. All faded people are tinned. If someone is faded and not curricular then they are tinned. If someone is tinned and not curricular then they are exhaustive. If someone is tinned and curricular then they are not exhaustive. If the fawn is not tinned and the fawn is not faded then the fawn is exhaustive. The fawn is not exhaustive.", "logic": "\nnot Faded(fawn)\nClosed(fawn)\nExhaustive(fawn)\nnot Tinned(fawn)\nCurricular(fawn)\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Curricular(x))\nforall x (Faded(x) -> not Curricular(x))\nFaded(fawn) -> Tinned(fawn)\nforall x (Faded(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Faded(x) and not Curricular(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Tinned(x) and not Curricular(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\nforall x (Tinned(x) and Curricular(x) -> not Exhaustive(x))\nnot Tinned(fawn) and not Faded(fawn) -> Exhaustive(fawn)\n\nnot Exhaustive(fawn)\n\ntherefore Exhaustive(fawn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4914"} {"premises": "The ede is not hewn. The ede is crossed. The ede is piebald. The ede is not energising. The ede is suety. Cold people are suety. All hewn people are not suety. If the ede is hewn then the ede is energising. All hewn people are energising. If someone is hewn and not suety then they are energising. If someone is energising and not suety then they are piebald. If someone is energising and suety then they are not piebald. If the ede is not energising and the ede is not hewn then the ede is piebald. The ede does not chase the ede.", "logic": "\nnot Hewn(ede)\nCrossed(ede)\nPiebald(ede)\nnot Energising(ede)\nSuety(ede)\nforall x (Crossed(x) -> Suety(x))\nforall x (Hewn(x) -> not Suety(x))\nHewn(ede) -> Energising(ede)\nforall x (Hewn(x) -> Energising(x))\nforall x (Hewn(x) and not Suety(x) -> Energising(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) and not Suety(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) and Suety(x) -> not Piebald(x))\nnot Energising(ede) and not Hewn(ede) -> Piebald(ede)\n\nnot Chases(ede, ede)\n\nnot Chases(ede, ede) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4914"} {"premises": "The ciara is not exodontic. The ciara is woollen. The ciara is tragical. The ciara is not palatine. The ciara is silverish. Cold people are silverish. All exodontic people are not silverish. If the ciara is exodontic then the ciara is palatine. All exodontic people are palatine. If someone is exodontic and not silverish then they are palatine. If someone is palatine and not silverish then they are tragical. If someone is palatine and silverish then they are not tragical. If the ciara is not palatine and the ciara is not exodontic then the ciara is tragical. The ciara likes the ciara.", "logic": "\nnot Exodontic(ciara)\nWoollen(ciara)\nTragical(ciara)\nnot Palatine(ciara)\nSilverish(ciara)\nforall x (Woollen(x) -> Silverish(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) -> not Silverish(x))\nExodontic(ciara) -> Palatine(ciara)\nforall x (Exodontic(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) and not Silverish(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) and not Silverish(x) -> Tragical(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) and Silverish(x) -> not Tragical(x))\nnot Palatine(ciara) and not Exodontic(ciara) -> Tragical(ciara)\n\nLikes(ciara, ciara)\n\nLikes(ciara, ciara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4914"} {"premises": "The leopold phonate the stuart. The leopold separate the egbert. The leopold is not abstracted. The leopold is priggish. The leopold worry the egbert. The leopold does not need the stuart. The egbert is not frosted. The egbert is djiboutian. The egbert does not need the leopold. The stuart phonate the leopold. The stuart separate the leopold. The stuart worry the leopold. If someone phonate the stuart then the stuart is unlined. If someone is abstracted and they need the egbert then they eat the stuart. If someone phonate the stuart then they do not chase the egbert. If someone phonate the leopold and they are unlined then they chase the stuart. If the egbert is not abstracted and the egbert does not need the leopold then the leopold worry the egbert. If someone worry the leopold and the leopold separate the stuart then the stuart is priggish. The egbert is djiboutian.", "logic": "\nPhonate(leopold, stuart)\nSeparate(leopold, egbert)\nnot Abstracted(leopold)\nPriggish(leopold)\nWorry(leopold, egbert)\nnot Worry(leopold, stuart)\nnot Frosted(egbert)\nDjiboutian(egbert)\nnot Worry(egbert, leopold)\nPhonate(stuart, leopold)\nSeparate(stuart, leopold)\nWorry(stuart, leopold)\nforall x (Phonate(x, stuart) -> Unlined(stuart))\nforall x (Abstracted(x) and Worry(x, egbert) -> Separate(x, stuart))\nforall x (Phonate(x, stuart) -> not Phonate(x, egbert))\nforall x (Phonate(x, leopold) and Unlined(x) -> Phonate(x, stuart))\nnot Abstracted(egbert) and not Worry(egbert, leopold) -> Worry(leopold, egbert)\nforall x (Worry(x, leopold) and Separate(leopold, stuart) -> Priggish(stuart))\n\nDjiboutian(egbert)\n\ntherefore Djiboutian(egbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The avrom recommit the fraser. The avrom belly the emelina. The avrom is not semiliquid. The avrom is unrelieved. The avrom libel the emelina. The avrom does not need the fraser. The emelina is not incurious. The emelina is splashed. The emelina does not need the avrom. The fraser recommit the avrom. The fraser belly the avrom. The fraser libel the avrom. If someone recommit the fraser then the fraser is jolting. If someone is semiliquid and they need the emelina then they eat the fraser. If someone recommit the fraser then they do not chase the emelina. If someone recommit the avrom and they are jolting then they chase the fraser. If the emelina is not semiliquid and the emelina does not need the avrom then the avrom libel the emelina. If someone libel the avrom and the avrom belly the fraser then the fraser is unrelieved. The emelina is not splashed.", "logic": "\nRecommit(avrom, fraser)\nBelly(avrom, emelina)\nnot Semiliquid(avrom)\nUnrelieved(avrom)\nLibel(avrom, emelina)\nnot Libel(avrom, fraser)\nnot Incurious(emelina)\nSplashed(emelina)\nnot Libel(emelina, avrom)\nRecommit(fraser, avrom)\nBelly(fraser, avrom)\nLibel(fraser, avrom)\nforall x (Recommit(x, fraser) -> Jolting(fraser))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Libel(x, emelina) -> Belly(x, fraser))\nforall x (Recommit(x, fraser) -> not Recommit(x, emelina))\nforall x (Recommit(x, avrom) and Jolting(x) -> Recommit(x, fraser))\nnot Semiliquid(emelina) and not Libel(emelina, avrom) -> Libel(avrom, emelina)\nforall x (Libel(x, avrom) and Belly(avrom, fraser) -> Unrelieved(fraser))\n\nnot Splashed(emelina)\n\ntherefore Splashed(emelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The rubi clutch the dian. The rubi bedizen the whitman. The rubi is not petrifying. The rubi is nipponese. The rubi refashion the whitman. The rubi does not need the dian. The whitman is not lifeless. The whitman is admired. The whitman does not need the rubi. The dian clutch the rubi. The dian bedizen the rubi. The dian refashion the rubi. If someone clutch the dian then the dian is larboard. If someone is petrifying and they need the whitman then they eat the dian. If someone clutch the dian then they do not chase the whitman. If someone clutch the rubi and they are larboard then they chase the dian. If the whitman is not petrifying and the whitman does not need the rubi then the rubi refashion the whitman. If someone refashion the rubi and the rubi bedizen the dian then the dian is nipponese. The dian is larboard.", "logic": "\nClutch(rubi, dian)\nBedizen(rubi, whitman)\nnot Petrifying(rubi)\nNipponese(rubi)\nRefashion(rubi, whitman)\nnot Refashion(rubi, dian)\nnot Lifeless(whitman)\nAdmired(whitman)\nnot Refashion(whitman, rubi)\nClutch(dian, rubi)\nBedizen(dian, rubi)\nRefashion(dian, rubi)\nforall x (Clutch(x, dian) -> Larboard(dian))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) and Refashion(x, whitman) -> Bedizen(x, dian))\nforall x (Clutch(x, dian) -> not Clutch(x, whitman))\nforall x (Clutch(x, rubi) and Larboard(x) -> Clutch(x, dian))\nnot Petrifying(whitman) and not Refashion(whitman, rubi) -> Refashion(rubi, whitman)\nforall x (Refashion(x, rubi) and Bedizen(rubi, dian) -> Nipponese(dian))\n\nLarboard(dian)\n\nClutch(rubi, dian) and forall x (Clutch(x, dian) -> Larboard(dian)) -> therefore Larboard(dian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The alister unbridle the perceval. The alister bode the lana. The alister is not aberrant. The alister is unfettered. The alister elute the lana. The alister does not need the perceval. The lana is not explicit. The lana is jawless. The lana does not need the alister. The perceval unbridle the alister. The perceval bode the alister. The perceval elute the alister. If someone unbridle the perceval then the perceval is unsteady. If someone is aberrant and they need the lana then they eat the perceval. If someone unbridle the perceval then they do not chase the lana. If someone unbridle the alister and they are unsteady then they chase the perceval. If the lana is not aberrant and the lana does not need the alister then the alister elute the lana. If someone elute the alister and the alister bode the perceval then the perceval is unfettered. The alister unbridle the lana.", "logic": "\nUnbridle(alister, perceval)\nBode(alister, lana)\nnot Aberrant(alister)\nUnfettered(alister)\nElute(alister, lana)\nnot Elute(alister, perceval)\nnot Explicit(lana)\nJawless(lana)\nnot Elute(lana, alister)\nUnbridle(perceval, alister)\nBode(perceval, alister)\nElute(perceval, alister)\nforall x (Unbridle(x, perceval) -> Unsteady(perceval))\nforall x (Aberrant(x) and Elute(x, lana) -> Bode(x, perceval))\nforall x (Unbridle(x, perceval) -> not Unbridle(x, lana))\nforall x (Unbridle(x, alister) and Unsteady(x) -> Unbridle(x, perceval))\nnot Aberrant(lana) and not Elute(lana, alister) -> Elute(alister, lana)\nforall x (Elute(x, alister) and Bode(alister, perceval) -> Unfettered(perceval))\n\nUnbridle(alister, lana)\n\nUnbridle(alister, perceval) and forall x (Unbridle(x, perceval) -> not Unbridle(x, lana)) -> therefore not Unbridle(alister, lana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The harmonia bloat the elias. The harmonia consume the malinde. The harmonia is not adapted. The harmonia is terrifying. The harmonia semaphore the malinde. The harmonia does not need the elias. The malinde is not overmuch. The malinde is phylliform. The malinde does not need the harmonia. The elias bloat the harmonia. The elias consume the harmonia. The elias semaphore the harmonia. If someone bloat the elias then the elias is aberrant. If someone is adapted and they need the malinde then they eat the elias. If someone bloat the elias then they do not chase the malinde. If someone bloat the harmonia and they are aberrant then they chase the elias. If the malinde is not adapted and the malinde does not need the harmonia then the harmonia semaphore the malinde. If someone semaphore the harmonia and the harmonia consume the elias then the elias is terrifying. The elias bloat the elias.", "logic": "\nBloat(harmonia, elias)\nConsume(harmonia, malinde)\nnot Adapted(harmonia)\nTerrifying(harmonia)\nSemaphore(harmonia, malinde)\nnot Semaphore(harmonia, elias)\nnot Overmuch(malinde)\nPhylliform(malinde)\nnot Semaphore(malinde, harmonia)\nBloat(elias, harmonia)\nConsume(elias, harmonia)\nSemaphore(elias, harmonia)\nforall x (Bloat(x, elias) -> Aberrant(elias))\nforall x (Adapted(x) and Semaphore(x, malinde) -> Consume(x, elias))\nforall x (Bloat(x, elias) -> not Bloat(x, malinde))\nforall x (Bloat(x, harmonia) and Aberrant(x) -> Bloat(x, elias))\nnot Adapted(malinde) and not Semaphore(malinde, harmonia) -> Semaphore(harmonia, malinde)\nforall x (Semaphore(x, harmonia) and Consume(harmonia, elias) -> Terrifying(elias))\n\nBloat(elias, elias)\n\nBloat(harmonia, elias) and forall x (Bloat(x, elias) -> Aberrant(elias)) -> therefore Aberrant(elias) Bloat(elias, harmonia) and Aberrant(elias) and forall x (Bloat(x, harmonia) and Aberrant(x) -> Bloat(x, elias)) -> therefore Bloat(elias, elias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The verina cerebrate the gilli. The verina dissuade the glorianna. The verina is not managerial. The verina is sinusoidal. The verina rhapsodise the glorianna. The verina does not need the gilli. The glorianna is not meshugge. The glorianna is nonslip. The glorianna does not need the verina. The gilli cerebrate the verina. The gilli dissuade the verina. The gilli rhapsodise the verina. If someone cerebrate the gilli then the gilli is septicemic. If someone is managerial and they need the glorianna then they eat the gilli. If someone cerebrate the gilli then they do not chase the glorianna. If someone cerebrate the verina and they are septicemic then they chase the gilli. If the glorianna is not managerial and the glorianna does not need the verina then the verina rhapsodise the glorianna. If someone rhapsodise the verina and the verina dissuade the gilli then the gilli is sinusoidal. The gilli does not chase the gilli.", "logic": "\nCerebrate(verina, gilli)\nDissuade(verina, glorianna)\nnot Managerial(verina)\nSinusoidal(verina)\nRhapsodise(verina, glorianna)\nnot Rhapsodise(verina, gilli)\nnot Meshugge(glorianna)\nNonslip(glorianna)\nnot Rhapsodise(glorianna, verina)\nCerebrate(gilli, verina)\nDissuade(gilli, verina)\nRhapsodise(gilli, verina)\nforall x (Cerebrate(x, gilli) -> Septicemic(gilli))\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Rhapsodise(x, glorianna) -> Dissuade(x, gilli))\nforall x (Cerebrate(x, gilli) -> not Cerebrate(x, glorianna))\nforall x (Cerebrate(x, verina) and Septicemic(x) -> Cerebrate(x, gilli))\nnot Managerial(glorianna) and not Rhapsodise(glorianna, verina) -> Rhapsodise(verina, glorianna)\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, verina) and Dissuade(verina, gilli) -> Sinusoidal(gilli))\n\nnot Cerebrate(gilli, gilli)\n\nCerebrate(verina, gilli) and forall x (Cerebrate(x, gilli) -> Septicemic(gilli)) -> therefore Septicemic(gilli) Cerebrate(gilli, verina) and Septicemic(gilli) and forall x (Cerebrate(x, verina) and Septicemic(x) -> Cerebrate(x, gilli)) -> therefore Cerebrate(gilli, gilli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The faith parboil the sascha. The faith forestall the laurena. The faith is not nationwide. The faith is entire. The faith discommode the laurena. The faith does not need the sascha. The laurena is not gargantuan. The laurena is humble. The laurena does not need the faith. The sascha parboil the faith. The sascha forestall the faith. The sascha discommode the faith. If someone parboil the sascha then the sascha is admissive. If someone is nationwide and they need the laurena then they eat the sascha. If someone parboil the sascha then they do not chase the laurena. If someone parboil the faith and they are admissive then they chase the sascha. If the laurena is not nationwide and the laurena does not need the faith then the faith discommode the laurena. If someone discommode the faith and the faith forestall the sascha then the sascha is entire. The sascha does not chase the laurena.", "logic": "\nParboil(faith, sascha)\nForestall(faith, laurena)\nnot Nationwide(faith)\nEntire(faith)\nDiscommode(faith, laurena)\nnot Discommode(faith, sascha)\nnot Gargantuan(laurena)\nHumble(laurena)\nnot Discommode(laurena, faith)\nParboil(sascha, faith)\nForestall(sascha, faith)\nDiscommode(sascha, faith)\nforall x (Parboil(x, sascha) -> Admissive(sascha))\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and Discommode(x, laurena) -> Forestall(x, sascha))\nforall x (Parboil(x, sascha) -> not Parboil(x, laurena))\nforall x (Parboil(x, faith) and Admissive(x) -> Parboil(x, sascha))\nnot Nationwide(laurena) and not Discommode(laurena, faith) -> Discommode(faith, laurena)\nforall x (Discommode(x, faith) and Forestall(faith, sascha) -> Entire(sascha))\n\nnot Parboil(sascha, laurena)\n\nParboil(faith, sascha) and forall x (Parboil(x, sascha) -> Admissive(sascha)) -> therefore Admissive(sascha) Parboil(sascha, faith) and Admissive(sascha) and forall x (Parboil(x, faith) and Admissive(x) -> Parboil(x, sascha)) -> therefore Parboil(sascha, sascha) Parboil(sascha, sascha) and forall x (Parboil(x, sascha) -> not Parboil(x, laurena)) -> therefore not Parboil(sascha, laurena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The pearl ramify the hedi. The pearl swoosh the adella. The pearl is not flowery. The pearl is senegalese. The pearl harshen the adella. The pearl does not need the hedi. The adella is not disclike. The adella is cherty. The adella does not need the pearl. The hedi ramify the pearl. The hedi swoosh the pearl. The hedi harshen the pearl. If someone ramify the hedi then the hedi is rusty. If someone is flowery and they need the adella then they eat the hedi. If someone ramify the hedi then they do not chase the adella. If someone ramify the pearl and they are rusty then they chase the hedi. If the adella is not flowery and the adella does not need the pearl then the pearl harshen the adella. If someone harshen the pearl and the pearl swoosh the hedi then the hedi is senegalese. The hedi ramify the adella.", "logic": "\nRamify(pearl, hedi)\nSwoosh(pearl, adella)\nnot Flowery(pearl)\nSenegalese(pearl)\nHarshen(pearl, adella)\nnot Harshen(pearl, hedi)\nnot Disclike(adella)\nCherty(adella)\nnot Harshen(adella, pearl)\nRamify(hedi, pearl)\nSwoosh(hedi, pearl)\nHarshen(hedi, pearl)\nforall x (Ramify(x, hedi) -> Rusty(hedi))\nforall x (Flowery(x) and Harshen(x, adella) -> Swoosh(x, hedi))\nforall x (Ramify(x, hedi) -> not Ramify(x, adella))\nforall x (Ramify(x, pearl) and Rusty(x) -> Ramify(x, hedi))\nnot Flowery(adella) and not Harshen(adella, pearl) -> Harshen(pearl, adella)\nforall x (Harshen(x, pearl) and Swoosh(pearl, hedi) -> Senegalese(hedi))\n\nRamify(hedi, adella)\n\nRamify(pearl, hedi) and forall x (Ramify(x, hedi) -> Rusty(hedi)) -> therefore Rusty(hedi) Ramify(hedi, pearl) and Rusty(hedi) and forall x (Ramify(x, pearl) and Rusty(x) -> Ramify(x, hedi)) -> therefore Ramify(hedi, hedi) Ramify(hedi, hedi) and forall x (Ramify(x, hedi) -> not Ramify(x, adella)) -> therefore not Ramify(hedi, adella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The tome overthrow the bree. The tome prolong the torry. The tome is not further. The tome is lawless. The tome revivify the torry. The tome does not need the bree. The torry is not pureblood. The torry is mental. The torry does not need the tome. The bree overthrow the tome. The bree prolong the tome. The bree revivify the tome. If someone overthrow the bree then the bree is apogametic. If someone is further and they need the torry then they eat the bree. If someone overthrow the bree then they do not chase the torry. If someone overthrow the tome and they are apogametic then they chase the bree. If the torry is not further and the torry does not need the tome then the tome revivify the torry. If someone revivify the tome and the tome prolong the bree then the bree is lawless. The torry does not chase the bree.", "logic": "\nOverthrow(tome, bree)\nProlong(tome, torry)\nnot Further(tome)\nLawless(tome)\nRevivify(tome, torry)\nnot Revivify(tome, bree)\nnot Pureblood(torry)\nMental(torry)\nnot Revivify(torry, tome)\nOverthrow(bree, tome)\nProlong(bree, tome)\nRevivify(bree, tome)\nforall x (Overthrow(x, bree) -> Apogametic(bree))\nforall x (Further(x) and Revivify(x, torry) -> Prolong(x, bree))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, bree) -> not Overthrow(x, torry))\nforall x (Overthrow(x, tome) and Apogametic(x) -> Overthrow(x, bree))\nnot Further(torry) and not Revivify(torry, tome) -> Revivify(tome, torry)\nforall x (Revivify(x, tome) and Prolong(tome, bree) -> Lawless(bree))\n\nnot Overthrow(torry, bree)\n\nforall x (Overthrow(x, tome) and Apogametic(x) -> Overthrow(x, bree)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The ingamar chevy the elizabet. The ingamar captivate the carree. The ingamar is not material. The ingamar is lithic. The ingamar mass the carree. The ingamar does not need the elizabet. The carree is not braw. The carree is clustered. The carree does not need the ingamar. The elizabet chevy the ingamar. The elizabet captivate the ingamar. The elizabet mass the ingamar. If someone chevy the elizabet then the elizabet is meaty. If someone is material and they need the carree then they eat the elizabet. If someone chevy the elizabet then they do not chase the carree. If someone chevy the ingamar and they are meaty then they chase the elizabet. If the carree is not material and the carree does not need the ingamar then the ingamar mass the carree. If someone mass the ingamar and the ingamar captivate the elizabet then the elizabet is lithic. The elizabet is lithic.", "logic": "\nChevy(ingamar, elizabet)\nCaptivate(ingamar, carree)\nnot Material(ingamar)\nLithic(ingamar)\nMass(ingamar, carree)\nnot Mass(ingamar, elizabet)\nnot Braw(carree)\nClustered(carree)\nnot Mass(carree, ingamar)\nChevy(elizabet, ingamar)\nCaptivate(elizabet, ingamar)\nMass(elizabet, ingamar)\nforall x (Chevy(x, elizabet) -> Meaty(elizabet))\nforall x (Material(x) and Mass(x, carree) -> Captivate(x, elizabet))\nforall x (Chevy(x, elizabet) -> not Chevy(x, carree))\nforall x (Chevy(x, ingamar) and Meaty(x) -> Chevy(x, elizabet))\nnot Material(carree) and not Mass(carree, ingamar) -> Mass(ingamar, carree)\nforall x (Mass(x, ingamar) and Captivate(ingamar, elizabet) -> Lithic(elizabet))\n\nLithic(elizabet)\n\nforall x (Mass(x, ingamar) and Captivate(ingamar, elizabet) -> Lithic(elizabet)) <- forall x (Material(x) and Mass(x, carree) -> Captivate(x, elizabet)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The kathy raven the ozzie. The kathy nasalise the tonia. The kathy is not thundering. The kathy is smooth. The kathy unsanctify the tonia. The kathy does not need the ozzie. The tonia is not sloughy. The tonia is macaronic. The tonia does not need the kathy. The ozzie raven the kathy. The ozzie nasalise the kathy. The ozzie unsanctify the kathy. If someone raven the ozzie then the ozzie is mistakable. If someone is thundering and they need the tonia then they eat the ozzie. If someone raven the ozzie then they do not chase the tonia. If someone raven the kathy and they are mistakable then they chase the ozzie. If the tonia is not thundering and the tonia does not need the kathy then the kathy unsanctify the tonia. If someone unsanctify the kathy and the kathy nasalise the ozzie then the ozzie is smooth. The tonia does not eat the ozzie.", "logic": "\nRaven(kathy, ozzie)\nNasalise(kathy, tonia)\nnot Thundering(kathy)\nSmooth(kathy)\nUnsanctify(kathy, tonia)\nnot Unsanctify(kathy, ozzie)\nnot Sloughy(tonia)\nMacaronic(tonia)\nnot Unsanctify(tonia, kathy)\nRaven(ozzie, kathy)\nNasalise(ozzie, kathy)\nUnsanctify(ozzie, kathy)\nforall x (Raven(x, ozzie) -> Mistakable(ozzie))\nforall x (Thundering(x) and Unsanctify(x, tonia) -> Nasalise(x, ozzie))\nforall x (Raven(x, ozzie) -> not Raven(x, tonia))\nforall x (Raven(x, kathy) and Mistakable(x) -> Raven(x, ozzie))\nnot Thundering(tonia) and not Unsanctify(tonia, kathy) -> Unsanctify(kathy, tonia)\nforall x (Unsanctify(x, kathy) and Nasalise(kathy, ozzie) -> Smooth(ozzie))\n\nnot Nasalise(tonia, ozzie)\n\nforall x (Thundering(x) and Unsanctify(x, tonia) -> Nasalise(x, ozzie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The nicholas lump the zuzana. The nicholas vesicate the ronnica. The nicholas is not unstudied. The nicholas is twisty. The nicholas latch the ronnica. The nicholas does not need the zuzana. The ronnica is not xxxi. The ronnica is reliable. The ronnica does not need the nicholas. The zuzana lump the nicholas. The zuzana vesicate the nicholas. The zuzana latch the nicholas. If someone lump the zuzana then the zuzana is indisposed. If someone is unstudied and they need the ronnica then they eat the zuzana. If someone lump the zuzana then they do not chase the ronnica. If someone lump the nicholas and they are indisposed then they chase the zuzana. If the ronnica is not unstudied and the ronnica does not need the nicholas then the nicholas latch the ronnica. If someone latch the nicholas and the nicholas vesicate the zuzana then the zuzana is twisty. The nicholas vesicate the zuzana.", "logic": "\nLump(nicholas, zuzana)\nVesicate(nicholas, ronnica)\nnot Unstudied(nicholas)\nTwisty(nicholas)\nLatch(nicholas, ronnica)\nnot Latch(nicholas, zuzana)\nnot Xxxi(ronnica)\nReliable(ronnica)\nnot Latch(ronnica, nicholas)\nLump(zuzana, nicholas)\nVesicate(zuzana, nicholas)\nLatch(zuzana, nicholas)\nforall x (Lump(x, zuzana) -> Indisposed(zuzana))\nforall x (Unstudied(x) and Latch(x, ronnica) -> Vesicate(x, zuzana))\nforall x (Lump(x, zuzana) -> not Lump(x, ronnica))\nforall x (Lump(x, nicholas) and Indisposed(x) -> Lump(x, zuzana))\nnot Unstudied(ronnica) and not Latch(ronnica, nicholas) -> Latch(nicholas, ronnica)\nforall x (Latch(x, nicholas) and Vesicate(nicholas, zuzana) -> Twisty(zuzana))\n\nVesicate(nicholas, zuzana)\n\nforall x (Unstudied(x) and Latch(x, ronnica) -> Vesicate(x, zuzana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The chrisy pronounce the essie. The chrisy affix the ilse. The chrisy is not basiscopic. The chrisy is nineteen. The chrisy picture the ilse. The chrisy does not need the essie. The ilse is not unbalanced. The ilse is ceruminous. The ilse does not need the chrisy. The essie pronounce the chrisy. The essie affix the chrisy. The essie picture the chrisy. If someone pronounce the essie then the essie is associate. If someone is basiscopic and they need the ilse then they eat the essie. If someone pronounce the essie then they do not chase the ilse. If someone pronounce the chrisy and they are associate then they chase the essie. If the ilse is not basiscopic and the ilse does not need the chrisy then the chrisy picture the ilse. If someone picture the chrisy and the chrisy affix the essie then the essie is nineteen. The ilse is not basiscopic.", "logic": "\nPronounce(chrisy, essie)\nAffix(chrisy, ilse)\nnot Basiscopic(chrisy)\nNineteen(chrisy)\nPicture(chrisy, ilse)\nnot Picture(chrisy, essie)\nnot Unbalanced(ilse)\nCeruminous(ilse)\nnot Picture(ilse, chrisy)\nPronounce(essie, chrisy)\nAffix(essie, chrisy)\nPicture(essie, chrisy)\nforall x (Pronounce(x, essie) -> Associate(essie))\nforall x (Basiscopic(x) and Picture(x, ilse) -> Affix(x, essie))\nforall x (Pronounce(x, essie) -> not Pronounce(x, ilse))\nforall x (Pronounce(x, chrisy) and Associate(x) -> Pronounce(x, essie))\nnot Basiscopic(ilse) and not Picture(ilse, chrisy) -> Picture(chrisy, ilse)\nforall x (Picture(x, chrisy) and Affix(chrisy, essie) -> Nineteen(essie))\n\nnot Basiscopic(ilse)\n\nnot Basiscopic(ilse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The gerladina solvate the nicholas. The gerladina subluxate the brianna. The gerladina is not antemortem. The gerladina is duodenal. The gerladina obscure the brianna. The gerladina does not need the nicholas. The brianna is not unitarian. The brianna is downwind. The brianna does not need the gerladina. The nicholas solvate the gerladina. The nicholas subluxate the gerladina. The nicholas obscure the gerladina. If someone solvate the nicholas then the nicholas is tranquil. If someone is antemortem and they need the brianna then they eat the nicholas. If someone solvate the nicholas then they do not chase the brianna. If someone solvate the gerladina and they are tranquil then they chase the nicholas. If the brianna is not antemortem and the brianna does not need the gerladina then the gerladina obscure the brianna. If someone obscure the gerladina and the gerladina subluxate the nicholas then the nicholas is duodenal. The gerladina obscure the gerladina.", "logic": "\nSolvate(gerladina, nicholas)\nSubluxate(gerladina, brianna)\nnot Antemortem(gerladina)\nDuodenal(gerladina)\nObscure(gerladina, brianna)\nnot Obscure(gerladina, nicholas)\nnot Unitarian(brianna)\nDownwind(brianna)\nnot Obscure(brianna, gerladina)\nSolvate(nicholas, gerladina)\nSubluxate(nicholas, gerladina)\nObscure(nicholas, gerladina)\nforall x (Solvate(x, nicholas) -> Tranquil(nicholas))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) and Obscure(x, brianna) -> Subluxate(x, nicholas))\nforall x (Solvate(x, nicholas) -> not Solvate(x, brianna))\nforall x (Solvate(x, gerladina) and Tranquil(x) -> Solvate(x, nicholas))\nnot Antemortem(brianna) and not Obscure(brianna, gerladina) -> Obscure(gerladina, brianna)\nforall x (Obscure(x, gerladina) and Subluxate(gerladina, nicholas) -> Duodenal(nicholas))\n\nObscure(gerladina, gerladina)\n\nObscure(gerladina, gerladina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The carmelia flow the tab. The carmelia demo the alford. The carmelia is not isolated. The carmelia is vociferous. The carmelia foliate the alford. The carmelia does not need the tab. The alford is not birchen. The alford is clarifying. The alford does not need the carmelia. The tab flow the carmelia. The tab demo the carmelia. The tab foliate the carmelia. If someone flow the tab then the tab is aquiline. If someone is isolated and they need the alford then they eat the tab. If someone flow the tab then they do not chase the alford. If someone flow the carmelia and they are aquiline then they chase the tab. If the alford is not isolated and the alford does not need the carmelia then the carmelia foliate the alford. If someone foliate the carmelia and the carmelia demo the tab then the tab is vociferous. The alford does not eat the carmelia.", "logic": "\nFlow(carmelia, tab)\nDemo(carmelia, alford)\nnot Isolated(carmelia)\nVociferous(carmelia)\nFoliate(carmelia, alford)\nnot Foliate(carmelia, tab)\nnot Birchen(alford)\nClarifying(alford)\nnot Foliate(alford, carmelia)\nFlow(tab, carmelia)\nDemo(tab, carmelia)\nFoliate(tab, carmelia)\nforall x (Flow(x, tab) -> Aquiline(tab))\nforall x (Isolated(x) and Foliate(x, alford) -> Demo(x, tab))\nforall x (Flow(x, tab) -> not Flow(x, alford))\nforall x (Flow(x, carmelia) and Aquiline(x) -> Flow(x, tab))\nnot Isolated(alford) and not Foliate(alford, carmelia) -> Foliate(carmelia, alford)\nforall x (Foliate(x, carmelia) and Demo(carmelia, tab) -> Vociferous(tab))\n\nnot Demo(alford, carmelia)\n\nnot Demo(alford, carmelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The celle triple the kirbee. The celle submarine the viv. The celle is not voluptuous. The celle is symmetric. The celle ambush the viv. The celle does not need the kirbee. The viv is not petalled. The viv is gory. The viv does not need the celle. The kirbee triple the celle. The kirbee submarine the celle. The kirbee ambush the celle. If someone triple the kirbee then the kirbee is allomerous. If someone is voluptuous and they need the viv then they eat the kirbee. If someone triple the kirbee then they do not chase the viv. If someone triple the celle and they are allomerous then they chase the kirbee. If the viv is not voluptuous and the viv does not need the celle then the celle ambush the viv. If someone ambush the celle and the celle submarine the kirbee then the kirbee is symmetric. The viv submarine the viv.", "logic": "\nTriple(celle, kirbee)\nSubmarine(celle, viv)\nnot Voluptuous(celle)\nSymmetric(celle)\nAmbush(celle, viv)\nnot Ambush(celle, kirbee)\nnot Petalled(viv)\nGory(viv)\nnot Ambush(viv, celle)\nTriple(kirbee, celle)\nSubmarine(kirbee, celle)\nAmbush(kirbee, celle)\nforall x (Triple(x, kirbee) -> Allomerous(kirbee))\nforall x (Voluptuous(x) and Ambush(x, viv) -> Submarine(x, kirbee))\nforall x (Triple(x, kirbee) -> not Triple(x, viv))\nforall x (Triple(x, celle) and Allomerous(x) -> Triple(x, kirbee))\nnot Voluptuous(viv) and not Ambush(viv, celle) -> Ambush(celle, viv)\nforall x (Ambush(x, celle) and Submarine(celle, kirbee) -> Symmetric(kirbee))\n\nSubmarine(viv, viv)\n\nSubmarine(viv, viv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-121"} {"premises": "The ilka is lusitanian. The ilka is moonlit. The ilka trammel the abigael. The abigael elate the ilka. The abigael persist the ilka. The abigael is assuasive. The abigael trammel the ilka. If someone is moonlit then they do not chase the abigael. If someone is moonlit and they do not chase the abigael then they chase the ilka. If someone trammel the abigael and they chase the ilka then they do not eat the abigael. The ilka is moonlit.", "logic": "\nLusitanian(ilka)\nMoonlit(ilka)\nTrammel(ilka, abigael)\nElate(abigael, ilka)\nPersist(abigael, ilka)\nAssuasive(abigael)\nTrammel(abigael, ilka)\nforall x (Moonlit(x) -> not Elate(x, abigael))\nforall x (Moonlit(x) and not Elate(x, abigael) -> Elate(x, ilka))\nforall x (Trammel(x, abigael) and Elate(x, ilka) -> not Persist(x, abigael))\n\nMoonlit(ilka)\n\ntherefore Moonlit(ilka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The sandie is saving. The sandie is westbound. The sandie impart the waite. The waite oversew the sandie. The waite breeze the sandie. The waite is sufi. The waite impart the sandie. If someone is westbound then they do not chase the waite. If someone is westbound and they do not chase the waite then they chase the sandie. If someone impart the waite and they chase the sandie then they do not eat the waite. The waite is not sufi.", "logic": "\nSaving(sandie)\nWestbound(sandie)\nImpart(sandie, waite)\nOversew(waite, sandie)\nBreeze(waite, sandie)\nSufi(waite)\nImpart(waite, sandie)\nforall x (Westbound(x) -> not Oversew(x, waite))\nforall x (Westbound(x) and not Oversew(x, waite) -> Oversew(x, sandie))\nforall x (Impart(x, waite) and Oversew(x, sandie) -> not Breeze(x, waite))\n\nnot Sufi(waite)\n\ntherefore Sufi(waite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The rice is upstream. The rice is contrary. The rice covet the sayres. The sayres weep the rice. The sayres gleam the rice. The sayres is upbeat. The sayres covet the rice. If someone is contrary then they do not chase the sayres. If someone is contrary and they do not chase the sayres then they chase the rice. If someone covet the sayres and they chase the rice then they do not eat the sayres. The rice does not chase the sayres.", "logic": "\nUpstream(rice)\nContrary(rice)\nCovet(rice, sayres)\nWeep(sayres, rice)\nGleam(sayres, rice)\nUpbeat(sayres)\nCovet(sayres, rice)\nforall x (Contrary(x) -> not Weep(x, sayres))\nforall x (Contrary(x) and not Weep(x, sayres) -> Weep(x, rice))\nforall x (Covet(x, sayres) and Weep(x, rice) -> not Gleam(x, sayres))\n\nnot Weep(rice, sayres)\n\nContrary(rice) and forall x (Contrary(x) -> not Weep(x, sayres)) -> therefore not Weep(rice, sayres)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The harriette is olympian. The harriette is cuprous. The harriette effloresce the fenelia. The fenelia stain the harriette. The fenelia achieve the harriette. The fenelia is glutinous. The fenelia effloresce the harriette. If someone is cuprous then they do not chase the fenelia. If someone is cuprous and they do not chase the fenelia then they chase the harriette. If someone effloresce the fenelia and they chase the harriette then they do not eat the fenelia. The harriette stain the fenelia.", "logic": "\nOlympian(harriette)\nCuprous(harriette)\nEffloresce(harriette, fenelia)\nStain(fenelia, harriette)\nAchieve(fenelia, harriette)\nGlutinous(fenelia)\nEffloresce(fenelia, harriette)\nforall x (Cuprous(x) -> not Stain(x, fenelia))\nforall x (Cuprous(x) and not Stain(x, fenelia) -> Stain(x, harriette))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, fenelia) and Stain(x, harriette) -> not Achieve(x, fenelia))\n\nStain(harriette, fenelia)\n\nCuprous(harriette) and forall x (Cuprous(x) -> not Stain(x, fenelia)) -> therefore not Stain(harriette, fenelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The gilles is awing. The gilles is nightlong. The gilles unearth the neel. The neel scandalize the gilles. The neel outmatch the gilles. The neel is ribbonlike. The neel unearth the gilles. If someone is nightlong then they do not chase the neel. If someone is nightlong and they do not chase the neel then they chase the gilles. If someone unearth the neel and they chase the gilles then they do not eat the neel. The gilles scandalize the gilles.", "logic": "\nAwing(gilles)\nNightlong(gilles)\nUnearth(gilles, neel)\nScandalize(neel, gilles)\nOutmatch(neel, gilles)\nRibbonlike(neel)\nUnearth(neel, gilles)\nforall x (Nightlong(x) -> not Scandalize(x, neel))\nforall x (Nightlong(x) and not Scandalize(x, neel) -> Scandalize(x, gilles))\nforall x (Unearth(x, neel) and Scandalize(x, gilles) -> not Outmatch(x, neel))\n\nScandalize(gilles, gilles)\n\nNightlong(gilles) and forall x (Nightlong(x) -> not Scandalize(x, neel)) -> therefore not Scandalize(gilles, neel) Nightlong(gilles) and not Scandalize(gilles, neel) and forall x (Nightlong(x) and not Scandalize(x, neel) -> Scandalize(x, gilles)) -> therefore Scandalize(gilles, gilles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The joel is lively. The joel is barehanded. The joel succumb the rustin. The rustin enamor the joel. The rustin vulgarise the joel. The rustin is confirming. The rustin succumb the joel. If someone is barehanded then they do not chase the rustin. If someone is barehanded and they do not chase the rustin then they chase the joel. If someone succumb the rustin and they chase the joel then they do not eat the rustin. The joel does not chase the joel.", "logic": "\nLively(joel)\nBarehanded(joel)\nSuccumb(joel, rustin)\nEnamor(rustin, joel)\nVulgarise(rustin, joel)\nConfirming(rustin)\nSuccumb(rustin, joel)\nforall x (Barehanded(x) -> not Enamor(x, rustin))\nforall x (Barehanded(x) and not Enamor(x, rustin) -> Enamor(x, joel))\nforall x (Succumb(x, rustin) and Enamor(x, joel) -> not Vulgarise(x, rustin))\n\nnot Enamor(joel, joel)\n\nBarehanded(joel) and forall x (Barehanded(x) -> not Enamor(x, rustin)) -> therefore not Enamor(joel, rustin) Barehanded(joel) and not Enamor(joel, rustin) and forall x (Barehanded(x) and not Enamor(x, rustin) -> Enamor(x, joel)) -> therefore Enamor(joel, joel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The jenette is aculeated. The jenette is gettable. The jenette demonetize the uri. The uri digitalize the jenette. The uri snigger the jenette. The uri is metacarpal. The uri demonetize the jenette. If someone is gettable then they do not chase the uri. If someone is gettable and they do not chase the uri then they chase the jenette. If someone demonetize the uri and they chase the jenette then they do not eat the uri. The jenette does not eat the uri.", "logic": "\nAculeated(jenette)\nGettable(jenette)\nDemonetize(jenette, uri)\nDigitalize(uri, jenette)\nSnigger(uri, jenette)\nMetacarpal(uri)\nDemonetize(uri, jenette)\nforall x (Gettable(x) -> not Digitalize(x, uri))\nforall x (Gettable(x) and not Digitalize(x, uri) -> Digitalize(x, jenette))\nforall x (Demonetize(x, uri) and Digitalize(x, jenette) -> not Snigger(x, uri))\n\nnot Snigger(jenette, uri)\n\nGettable(jenette) and forall x (Gettable(x) -> not Digitalize(x, uri)) -> therefore not Digitalize(jenette, uri) Gettable(jenette) and not Digitalize(jenette, uri) and forall x (Gettable(x) and not Digitalize(x, uri) -> Digitalize(x, jenette)) -> therefore Digitalize(jenette, jenette) Demonetize(jenette, uri) and Digitalize(jenette, jenette) and forall x (Demonetize(x, uri) and Digitalize(x, jenette) -> not Snigger(x, uri)) -> therefore not Snigger(jenette, uri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The kelcey is renowned. The kelcey is compounded. The kelcey trench the wendy. The wendy uncouple the kelcey. The wendy anguish the kelcey. The wendy is catenulate. The wendy trench the kelcey. If someone is compounded then they do not chase the wendy. If someone is compounded and they do not chase the wendy then they chase the kelcey. If someone trench the wendy and they chase the kelcey then they do not eat the wendy. The kelcey anguish the wendy.", "logic": "\nRenowned(kelcey)\nCompounded(kelcey)\nTrench(kelcey, wendy)\nUncouple(wendy, kelcey)\nAnguish(wendy, kelcey)\nCatenulate(wendy)\nTrench(wendy, kelcey)\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> not Uncouple(x, wendy))\nforall x (Compounded(x) and not Uncouple(x, wendy) -> Uncouple(x, kelcey))\nforall x (Trench(x, wendy) and Uncouple(x, kelcey) -> not Anguish(x, wendy))\n\nAnguish(kelcey, wendy)\n\nCompounded(kelcey) and forall x (Compounded(x) -> not Uncouple(x, wendy)) -> therefore not Uncouple(kelcey, wendy) Compounded(kelcey) and not Uncouple(kelcey, wendy) and forall x (Compounded(x) and not Uncouple(x, wendy) -> Uncouple(x, kelcey)) -> therefore Uncouple(kelcey, kelcey) Trench(kelcey, wendy) and Uncouple(kelcey, kelcey) and forall x (Trench(x, wendy) and Uncouple(x, kelcey) -> not Anguish(x, wendy)) -> therefore not Anguish(kelcey, wendy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The sherman is perfumed. The sherman is spooky. The sherman bequeath the marsha. The marsha pouch the sherman. The marsha grit the sherman. The marsha is amebic. The marsha bequeath the sherman. If someone is spooky then they do not chase the marsha. If someone is spooky and they do not chase the marsha then they chase the sherman. If someone bequeath the marsha and they chase the sherman then they do not eat the marsha. The sherman does not need the sherman.", "logic": "\nPerfumed(sherman)\nSpooky(sherman)\nBequeath(sherman, marsha)\nPouch(marsha, sherman)\nGrit(marsha, sherman)\nAmebic(marsha)\nBequeath(marsha, sherman)\nforall x (Spooky(x) -> not Pouch(x, marsha))\nforall x (Spooky(x) and not Pouch(x, marsha) -> Pouch(x, sherman))\nforall x (Bequeath(x, marsha) and Pouch(x, sherman) -> not Grit(x, marsha))\n\nnot Bequeath(sherman, sherman)\n\nnot Bequeath(sherman, sherman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The nancy is volar. The nancy is norman. The nancy garnishee the vanni. The vanni spoof the nancy. The vanni arch the nancy. The vanni is shoed. The vanni garnishee the nancy. If someone is norman then they do not chase the vanni. If someone is norman and they do not chase the vanni then they chase the nancy. If someone garnishee the vanni and they chase the nancy then they do not eat the vanni. The nancy is rough.", "logic": "\nVolar(nancy)\nNorman(nancy)\nGarnishee(nancy, vanni)\nSpoof(vanni, nancy)\nArch(vanni, nancy)\nShoed(vanni)\nGarnishee(vanni, nancy)\nforall x (Norman(x) -> not Spoof(x, vanni))\nforall x (Norman(x) and not Spoof(x, vanni) -> Spoof(x, nancy))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, vanni) and Spoof(x, nancy) -> not Arch(x, vanni))\n\nRough(nancy)\n\nRough(nancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The christos is sombre. The christos is governing. The christos wreathe the tracie. The tracie warn the christos. The tracie unhorse the christos. The tracie is hassidic. The tracie wreathe the christos. If someone is governing then they do not chase the tracie. If someone is governing and they do not chase the tracie then they chase the christos. If someone wreathe the tracie and they chase the christos then they do not eat the tracie. The tracie is not blue.", "logic": "\nSombre(christos)\nGoverning(christos)\nWreathe(christos, tracie)\nWarn(tracie, christos)\nUnhorse(tracie, christos)\nHassidic(tracie)\nWreathe(tracie, christos)\nforall x (Governing(x) -> not Warn(x, tracie))\nforall x (Governing(x) and not Warn(x, tracie) -> Warn(x, christos))\nforall x (Wreathe(x, tracie) and Warn(x, christos) -> not Unhorse(x, tracie))\n\nnot Blue(tracie)\n\nnot Blue(tracie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The tomasine is pupal. The tomasine is unvendible. The tomasine grill the janaya. The janaya ruckle the tomasine. The janaya overlook the tomasine. The janaya is stagey. The janaya grill the tomasine. If someone is unvendible then they do not chase the janaya. If someone is unvendible and they do not chase the janaya then they chase the tomasine. If someone grill the janaya and they chase the tomasine then they do not eat the janaya. The janaya overlook the janaya.", "logic": "\nPupal(tomasine)\nUnvendible(tomasine)\nGrill(tomasine, janaya)\nRuckle(janaya, tomasine)\nOverlook(janaya, tomasine)\nStagey(janaya)\nGrill(janaya, tomasine)\nforall x (Unvendible(x) -> not Ruckle(x, janaya))\nforall x (Unvendible(x) and not Ruckle(x, janaya) -> Ruckle(x, tomasine))\nforall x (Grill(x, janaya) and Ruckle(x, tomasine) -> not Overlook(x, janaya))\n\nOverlook(janaya, janaya)\n\nOverlook(janaya, janaya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The lilla is ungual. The lilla is parky. The lilla wine the caryn. The caryn establish the lilla. The caryn chirk the lilla. The caryn is agnostic. The caryn wine the lilla. If someone is parky then they do not chase the caryn. If someone is parky and they do not chase the caryn then they chase the lilla. If someone wine the caryn and they chase the lilla then they do not eat the caryn. The caryn is not parky.", "logic": "\nUngual(lilla)\nParky(lilla)\nWine(lilla, caryn)\nEstablish(caryn, lilla)\nChirk(caryn, lilla)\nAgnostic(caryn)\nWine(caryn, lilla)\nforall x (Parky(x) -> not Establish(x, caryn))\nforall x (Parky(x) and not Establish(x, caryn) -> Establish(x, lilla))\nforall x (Wine(x, caryn) and Establish(x, lilla) -> not Chirk(x, caryn))\n\nnot Parky(caryn)\n\nnot Parky(caryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The arda is armillary. The arda is regulation. The arda turf the debby. The debby tunnel the arda. The debby access the arda. The debby is teenage. The debby turf the arda. If someone is regulation then they do not chase the debby. If someone is regulation and they do not chase the debby then they chase the arda. If someone turf the debby and they chase the arda then they do not eat the debby. The arda is blue.", "logic": "\nArmillary(arda)\nRegulation(arda)\nTurf(arda, debby)\nTunnel(debby, arda)\nAccess(debby, arda)\nTeenage(debby)\nTurf(debby, arda)\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> not Tunnel(x, debby))\nforall x (Regulation(x) and not Tunnel(x, debby) -> Tunnel(x, arda))\nforall x (Turf(x, debby) and Tunnel(x, arda) -> not Access(x, debby))\n\nBlue(arda)\n\nBlue(arda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The ichabod is pliant. The ichabod is diarrhetic. The ichabod replete the jasmina. The jasmina impugn the ichabod. The jasmina relearn the ichabod. The jasmina is contrasty. The jasmina replete the ichabod. If someone is diarrhetic then they do not chase the jasmina. If someone is diarrhetic and they do not chase the jasmina then they chase the ichabod. If someone replete the jasmina and they chase the ichabod then they do not eat the jasmina. The ichabod does not eat the ichabod.", "logic": "\nPliant(ichabod)\nDiarrhetic(ichabod)\nReplete(ichabod, jasmina)\nImpugn(jasmina, ichabod)\nRelearn(jasmina, ichabod)\nContrasty(jasmina)\nReplete(jasmina, ichabod)\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) -> not Impugn(x, jasmina))\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) and not Impugn(x, jasmina) -> Impugn(x, ichabod))\nforall x (Replete(x, jasmina) and Impugn(x, ichabod) -> not Relearn(x, jasmina))\n\nnot Relearn(ichabod, ichabod)\n\nnot Relearn(ichabod, ichabod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "The thibaud is meaning. The thibaud is heliacal. The thibaud plow the mair. The mair attune the thibaud. The mair remedy the thibaud. The mair is urbanized. The mair plow the thibaud. If someone is heliacal then they do not chase the mair. If someone is heliacal and they do not chase the mair then they chase the thibaud. If someone plow the mair and they chase the thibaud then they do not eat the mair. The thibaud is urbanized.", "logic": "\nMeaning(thibaud)\nHeliacal(thibaud)\nPlow(thibaud, mair)\nAttune(mair, thibaud)\nRemedy(mair, thibaud)\nUrbanized(mair)\nPlow(mair, thibaud)\nforall x (Heliacal(x) -> not Attune(x, mair))\nforall x (Heliacal(x) and not Attune(x, mair) -> Attune(x, thibaud))\nforall x (Plow(x, mair) and Attune(x, thibaud) -> not Remedy(x, mair))\n\nUrbanized(thibaud)\n\nUrbanized(thibaud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-519"} {"premises": "Jami is unspoken. Jami is palatal. Jami is frolicky. Jami is unheeding. Essie is unspoken. Essie is scruffy. Essie is horrendous. Essie is unheeding. Price is scruffy. Hyatt is palatal. Nice things are scruffy. Cold things are palatal. If Price is horrendous then Price is frolicky. If something is unspoken and horrendous then it is laotian. Smart, frolicky things are horrendous. If Essie is laotian and Essie is scruffy then Essie is unheeding. Essie is scruffy.", "logic": "\nUnspoken(jami)\nPalatal(jami)\nFrolicky(jami)\nUnheeding(jami)\nUnspoken(essie)\nScruffy(essie)\nHorrendous(essie)\nUnheeding(essie)\nScruffy(price)\nPalatal(hyatt)\nforall x (Laotian(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Scruffy(x) -> Palatal(x))\nHorrendous(price) -> Frolicky(price)\nforall x (Unspoken(x) and Horrendous(x) -> Laotian(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) and Frolicky(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nLaotian(essie) and Scruffy(essie) -> Unheeding(essie)\n\nScruffy(essie)\n\ntherefore Scruffy(essie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Lelah is lxxxiv. Lelah is posthumous. Lelah is presumable. Lelah is coral. Ursala is lxxxiv. Ursala is maxillary. Ursala is coccoid. Ursala is coral. Renault is maxillary. Urban is posthumous. Nice things are maxillary. Cold things are posthumous. If Renault is coccoid then Renault is presumable. If something is lxxxiv and coccoid then it is lxxii. Smart, presumable things are coccoid. If Ursala is lxxii and Ursala is maxillary then Ursala is coral. Ursala is not coccoid.", "logic": "\nLxxxiv(lelah)\nPosthumous(lelah)\nPresumable(lelah)\nCoral(lelah)\nLxxxiv(ursala)\nMaxillary(ursala)\nCoccoid(ursala)\nCoral(ursala)\nMaxillary(renault)\nPosthumous(urban)\nforall x (Lxxii(x) -> Maxillary(x))\nforall x (Maxillary(x) -> Posthumous(x))\nCoccoid(renault) -> Presumable(renault)\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) and Coccoid(x) -> Lxxii(x))\nforall x (Coral(x) and Presumable(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nLxxii(ursala) and Maxillary(ursala) -> Coral(ursala)\n\nnot Coccoid(ursala)\n\ntherefore Coccoid(ursala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Shurlocke is prenominal. Shurlocke is frozen. Shurlocke is mutagenic. Shurlocke is east. Cherida is prenominal. Cherida is lowercase. Cherida is familiar. Cherida is east. Herbie is lowercase. Bridgette is frozen. Nice things are lowercase. Cold things are frozen. If Herbie is familiar then Herbie is mutagenic. If something is prenominal and familiar then it is cespitose. Smart, mutagenic things are familiar. If Cherida is cespitose and Cherida is lowercase then Cherida is east. Cherida is cespitose.", "logic": "\nPrenominal(shurlocke)\nFrozen(shurlocke)\nMutagenic(shurlocke)\nEast(shurlocke)\nPrenominal(cherida)\nLowercase(cherida)\nFamiliar(cherida)\nEast(cherida)\nLowercase(herbie)\nFrozen(bridgette)\nforall x (Cespitose(x) -> Lowercase(x))\nforall x (Lowercase(x) -> Frozen(x))\nFamiliar(herbie) -> Mutagenic(herbie)\nforall x (Prenominal(x) and Familiar(x) -> Cespitose(x))\nforall x (East(x) and Mutagenic(x) -> Familiar(x))\nCespitose(cherida) and Lowercase(cherida) -> East(cherida)\n\nCespitose(cherida)\n\nPrenominal(cherida) and Familiar(cherida) and forall x (Prenominal(x) and Familiar(x) -> Cespitose(x)) -> therefore Cespitose(cherida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Elie is filarial. Elie is venal. Elie is diminished. Elie is theocratic. Osborne is filarial. Osborne is befouled. Osborne is coordinate. Osborne is theocratic. Wolfy is befouled. Nissy is venal. Nice things are befouled. Cold things are venal. If Wolfy is coordinate then Wolfy is diminished. If something is filarial and coordinate then it is overlying. Smart, diminished things are coordinate. If Osborne is overlying and Osborne is befouled then Osborne is theocratic. Wolfy is not venal.", "logic": "\nFilarial(elie)\nVenal(elie)\nDiminished(elie)\nTheocratic(elie)\nFilarial(osborne)\nBefouled(osborne)\nCoordinate(osborne)\nTheocratic(osborne)\nBefouled(wolfy)\nVenal(nissy)\nforall x (Overlying(x) -> Befouled(x))\nforall x (Befouled(x) -> Venal(x))\nCoordinate(wolfy) -> Diminished(wolfy)\nforall x (Filarial(x) and Coordinate(x) -> Overlying(x))\nforall x (Theocratic(x) and Diminished(x) -> Coordinate(x))\nOverlying(osborne) and Befouled(osborne) -> Theocratic(osborne)\n\nnot Venal(wolfy)\n\nBefouled(wolfy) and forall x (Befouled(x) -> Venal(x)) -> therefore Venal(wolfy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Juliane is managerial. Juliane is clastic. Juliane is overnight. Juliane is backed. Karolina is managerial. Karolina is unspaced. Karolina is required. Karolina is backed. Smith is unspaced. Daune is clastic. Nice things are unspaced. Cold things are clastic. If Smith is required then Smith is overnight. If something is managerial and required then it is barmy. Smart, overnight things are required. If Karolina is barmy and Karolina is unspaced then Karolina is backed. Juliane is barmy.", "logic": "\nManagerial(juliane)\nClastic(juliane)\nOvernight(juliane)\nBacked(juliane)\nManagerial(karolina)\nUnspaced(karolina)\nRequired(karolina)\nBacked(karolina)\nUnspaced(smith)\nClastic(daune)\nforall x (Barmy(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nforall x (Unspaced(x) -> Clastic(x))\nRequired(smith) -> Overnight(smith)\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Required(x) -> Barmy(x))\nforall x (Backed(x) and Overnight(x) -> Required(x))\nBarmy(karolina) and Unspaced(karolina) -> Backed(karolina)\n\nBarmy(juliane)\n\nBacked(juliane) and Overnight(juliane) and forall x (Backed(x) and Overnight(x) -> Required(x)) -> therefore Required(juliane) Managerial(juliane) and Required(juliane) and forall x (Managerial(x) and Required(x) -> Barmy(x)) -> therefore Barmy(juliane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Monica is motivative. Monica is pure. Monica is pocked. Monica is humorous. Jaquelin is motivative. Jaquelin is chummy. Jaquelin is behind. Jaquelin is humorous. Rosalinda is chummy. Waly is pure. Nice things are chummy. Cold things are pure. If Rosalinda is behind then Rosalinda is pocked. If something is motivative and behind then it is dirt. Smart, pocked things are behind. If Jaquelin is dirt and Jaquelin is chummy then Jaquelin is humorous. Monica is not dirt.", "logic": "\nMotivative(monica)\nPure(monica)\nPocked(monica)\nHumorous(monica)\nMotivative(jaquelin)\nChummy(jaquelin)\nBehind(jaquelin)\nHumorous(jaquelin)\nChummy(rosalinda)\nPure(waly)\nforall x (Dirt(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Pure(x))\nBehind(rosalinda) -> Pocked(rosalinda)\nforall x (Motivative(x) and Behind(x) -> Dirt(x))\nforall x (Humorous(x) and Pocked(x) -> Behind(x))\nDirt(jaquelin) and Chummy(jaquelin) -> Humorous(jaquelin)\n\nnot Dirt(monica)\n\nHumorous(monica) and Pocked(monica) and forall x (Humorous(x) and Pocked(x) -> Behind(x)) -> therefore Behind(monica) Motivative(monica) and Behind(monica) and forall x (Motivative(x) and Behind(x) -> Dirt(x)) -> therefore Dirt(monica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Burt is branchy. Burt is ruly. Burt is augustan. Burt is sculptured. Andrei is branchy. Andrei is aboveboard. Andrei is unerring. Andrei is sculptured. Sonia is aboveboard. Thia is ruly. Nice things are aboveboard. Cold things are ruly. If Sonia is unerring then Sonia is augustan. If something is branchy and unerring then it is usual. Smart, augustan things are unerring. If Andrei is usual and Andrei is aboveboard then Andrei is sculptured. Burt is aboveboard.", "logic": "\nBranchy(burt)\nRuly(burt)\nAugustan(burt)\nSculptured(burt)\nBranchy(andrei)\nAboveboard(andrei)\nUnerring(andrei)\nSculptured(andrei)\nAboveboard(sonia)\nRuly(thia)\nforall x (Usual(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Ruly(x))\nUnerring(sonia) -> Augustan(sonia)\nforall x (Branchy(x) and Unerring(x) -> Usual(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) and Augustan(x) -> Unerring(x))\nUsual(andrei) and Aboveboard(andrei) -> Sculptured(andrei)\n\nAboveboard(burt)\n\nSculptured(burt) and Augustan(burt) and forall x (Sculptured(x) and Augustan(x) -> Unerring(x)) -> therefore Unerring(burt) Branchy(burt) and Unerring(burt) and forall x (Branchy(x) and Unerring(x) -> Usual(x)) -> therefore Usual(burt) Usual(burt) and forall x (Usual(x) -> Aboveboard(x)) -> therefore Aboveboard(burt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Kailey is encased. Kailey is slangy. Kailey is pyrogenic. Kailey is antiguan. Marjy is encased. Marjy is avuncular. Marjy is seventieth. Marjy is antiguan. Nevins is avuncular. Tori is slangy. Nice things are avuncular. Cold things are slangy. If Nevins is seventieth then Nevins is pyrogenic. If something is encased and seventieth then it is exciting. Smart, pyrogenic things are seventieth. If Marjy is exciting and Marjy is avuncular then Marjy is antiguan. Kailey is not avuncular.", "logic": "\nEncased(kailey)\nSlangy(kailey)\nPyrogenic(kailey)\nAntiguan(kailey)\nEncased(marjy)\nAvuncular(marjy)\nSeventieth(marjy)\nAntiguan(marjy)\nAvuncular(nevins)\nSlangy(tori)\nforall x (Exciting(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Slangy(x))\nSeventieth(nevins) -> Pyrogenic(nevins)\nforall x (Encased(x) and Seventieth(x) -> Exciting(x))\nforall x (Antiguan(x) and Pyrogenic(x) -> Seventieth(x))\nExciting(marjy) and Avuncular(marjy) -> Antiguan(marjy)\n\nnot Avuncular(kailey)\n\nAntiguan(kailey) and Pyrogenic(kailey) and forall x (Antiguan(x) and Pyrogenic(x) -> Seventieth(x)) -> therefore Seventieth(kailey) Encased(kailey) and Seventieth(kailey) and forall x (Encased(x) and Seventieth(x) -> Exciting(x)) -> therefore Exciting(kailey) Exciting(kailey) and forall x (Exciting(x) -> Avuncular(x)) -> therefore Avuncular(kailey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Darrell is confucian. Darrell is faddish. Darrell is ninth. Darrell is refutable. Janina is confucian. Janina is roaring. Janina is dyspeptic. Janina is refutable. Benoite is roaring. Tedra is faddish. Nice things are roaring. Cold things are faddish. If Benoite is dyspeptic then Benoite is ninth. If something is confucian and dyspeptic then it is jerky. Smart, ninth things are dyspeptic. If Janina is jerky and Janina is roaring then Janina is refutable. Benoite is not jerky.", "logic": "\nConfucian(darrell)\nFaddish(darrell)\nNinth(darrell)\nRefutable(darrell)\nConfucian(janina)\nRoaring(janina)\nDyspeptic(janina)\nRefutable(janina)\nRoaring(benoite)\nFaddish(tedra)\nforall x (Jerky(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) -> Faddish(x))\nDyspeptic(benoite) -> Ninth(benoite)\nforall x (Confucian(x) and Dyspeptic(x) -> Jerky(x))\nforall x (Refutable(x) and Ninth(x) -> Dyspeptic(x))\nJerky(janina) and Roaring(janina) -> Refutable(janina)\n\nnot Jerky(benoite)\n\nforall x (Confucian(x) and Dyspeptic(x) -> Jerky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Ingamar is denotive. Ingamar is unmolested. Ingamar is unendowed. Ingamar is caducean. Ginger is denotive. Ginger is unplumbed. Ginger is lxxxvi. Ginger is caducean. Margo is unplumbed. Dyana is unmolested. Nice things are unplumbed. Cold things are unmolested. If Margo is lxxxvi then Margo is unendowed. If something is denotive and lxxxvi then it is overhead. Smart, unendowed things are lxxxvi. If Ginger is overhead and Ginger is unplumbed then Ginger is caducean. Dyana is lxxxvi.", "logic": "\nDenotive(ingamar)\nUnmolested(ingamar)\nUnendowed(ingamar)\nCaducean(ingamar)\nDenotive(ginger)\nUnplumbed(ginger)\nLxxxvi(ginger)\nCaducean(ginger)\nUnplumbed(margo)\nUnmolested(dyana)\nforall x (Overhead(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nLxxxvi(margo) -> Unendowed(margo)\nforall x (Denotive(x) and Lxxxvi(x) -> Overhead(x))\nforall x (Caducean(x) and Unendowed(x) -> Lxxxvi(x))\nOverhead(ginger) and Unplumbed(ginger) -> Caducean(ginger)\n\nLxxxvi(dyana)\n\nforall x (Caducean(x) and Unendowed(x) -> Lxxxvi(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Noella is operose. Noella is askance. Noella is indiscreet. Noella is uncovered. Thomasin is operose. Thomasin is rigged. Thomasin is acceptable. Thomasin is uncovered. Orsa is rigged. Davy is askance. Nice things are rigged. Cold things are askance. If Orsa is acceptable then Orsa is indiscreet. If something is operose and acceptable then it is prefab. Smart, indiscreet things are acceptable. If Thomasin is prefab and Thomasin is rigged then Thomasin is uncovered. Davy is not rigged.", "logic": "\nOperose(noella)\nAskance(noella)\nIndiscreet(noella)\nUncovered(noella)\nOperose(thomasin)\nRigged(thomasin)\nAcceptable(thomasin)\nUncovered(thomasin)\nRigged(orsa)\nAskance(davy)\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Rigged(x))\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> Askance(x))\nAcceptable(orsa) -> Indiscreet(orsa)\nforall x (Operose(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Prefab(x))\nforall x (Uncovered(x) and Indiscreet(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nPrefab(thomasin) and Rigged(thomasin) -> Uncovered(thomasin)\n\nnot Rigged(davy)\n\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Rigged(x)) <- forall x (Operose(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Prefab(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Scarlett is taped. Scarlett is impendent. Scarlett is abortive. Scarlett is vulvar. Tabatha is taped. Tabatha is kindred. Tabatha is alpha. Tabatha is vulvar. Reagan is kindred. Pace is impendent. Nice things are kindred. Cold things are impendent. If Reagan is alpha then Reagan is abortive. If something is taped and alpha then it is divisible. Smart, abortive things are alpha. If Tabatha is divisible and Tabatha is kindred then Tabatha is vulvar. Pace is divisible.", "logic": "\nTaped(scarlett)\nImpendent(scarlett)\nAbortive(scarlett)\nVulvar(scarlett)\nTaped(tabatha)\nKindred(tabatha)\nAlpha(tabatha)\nVulvar(tabatha)\nKindred(reagan)\nImpendent(pace)\nforall x (Divisible(x) -> Kindred(x))\nforall x (Kindred(x) -> Impendent(x))\nAlpha(reagan) -> Abortive(reagan)\nforall x (Taped(x) and Alpha(x) -> Divisible(x))\nforall x (Vulvar(x) and Abortive(x) -> Alpha(x))\nDivisible(tabatha) and Kindred(tabatha) -> Vulvar(tabatha)\n\nDivisible(pace)\n\nforall x (Taped(x) and Alpha(x) -> Divisible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Devin is rotten. Devin is backstair. Devin is braggy. Devin is confucian. Patrice is rotten. Patrice is dilettante. Patrice is ensuing. Patrice is confucian. Linnell is dilettante. Thalia is backstair. Nice things are dilettante. Cold things are backstair. If Linnell is ensuing then Linnell is braggy. If something is rotten and ensuing then it is portuguese. Smart, braggy things are ensuing. If Patrice is portuguese and Patrice is dilettante then Patrice is confucian. Patrice is not braggy.", "logic": "\nRotten(devin)\nBackstair(devin)\nBraggy(devin)\nConfucian(devin)\nRotten(patrice)\nDilettante(patrice)\nEnsuing(patrice)\nConfucian(patrice)\nDilettante(linnell)\nBackstair(thalia)\nforall x (Portuguese(x) -> Dilettante(x))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Backstair(x))\nEnsuing(linnell) -> Braggy(linnell)\nforall x (Rotten(x) and Ensuing(x) -> Portuguese(x))\nforall x (Confucian(x) and Braggy(x) -> Ensuing(x))\nPortuguese(patrice) and Dilettante(patrice) -> Confucian(patrice)\n\nnot Braggy(patrice)\n\nnot Braggy(patrice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Shani is agential. Shani is ponderous. Shani is cousinly. Shani is uncrowned. Eleanor is agential. Eleanor is sudden. Eleanor is aerophilic. Eleanor is uncrowned. Brear is sudden. Micah is ponderous. Nice things are sudden. Cold things are ponderous. If Brear is aerophilic then Brear is cousinly. If something is agential and aerophilic then it is uncrossed. Smart, cousinly things are aerophilic. If Eleanor is uncrossed and Eleanor is sudden then Eleanor is uncrowned. Micah is uncrowned.", "logic": "\nAgential(shani)\nPonderous(shani)\nCousinly(shani)\nUncrowned(shani)\nAgential(eleanor)\nSudden(eleanor)\nAerophilic(eleanor)\nUncrowned(eleanor)\nSudden(brear)\nPonderous(micah)\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) -> Sudden(x))\nforall x (Sudden(x) -> Ponderous(x))\nAerophilic(brear) -> Cousinly(brear)\nforall x (Agential(x) and Aerophilic(x) -> Uncrossed(x))\nforall x (Uncrowned(x) and Cousinly(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nUncrossed(eleanor) and Sudden(eleanor) -> Uncrowned(eleanor)\n\nUncrowned(micah)\n\nUncrowned(micah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Thedric is legible. Thedric is bowfront. Thedric is falconine. Thedric is marshy. Lemmy is legible. Lemmy is adolescent. Lemmy is alterative. Lemmy is marshy. Melinde is adolescent. Yaakov is bowfront. Nice things are adolescent. Cold things are bowfront. If Melinde is alterative then Melinde is falconine. If something is legible and alterative then it is encyclical. Smart, falconine things are alterative. If Lemmy is encyclical and Lemmy is adolescent then Lemmy is marshy. Yaakov is not legible.", "logic": "\nLegible(thedric)\nBowfront(thedric)\nFalconine(thedric)\nMarshy(thedric)\nLegible(lemmy)\nAdolescent(lemmy)\nAlterative(lemmy)\nMarshy(lemmy)\nAdolescent(melinde)\nBowfront(yaakov)\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) -> Bowfront(x))\nAlterative(melinde) -> Falconine(melinde)\nforall x (Legible(x) and Alterative(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nforall x (Marshy(x) and Falconine(x) -> Alterative(x))\nEncyclical(lemmy) and Adolescent(lemmy) -> Marshy(lemmy)\n\nnot Legible(yaakov)\n\nnot Legible(yaakov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "Jesus is oncoming. Jesus is gauzy. Jesus is sharp. Jesus is relative. Phyllys is oncoming. Phyllys is wobbling. Phyllys is hornlike. Phyllys is relative. Viviyan is wobbling. Modestine is gauzy. Nice things are wobbling. Cold things are gauzy. If Viviyan is hornlike then Viviyan is sharp. If something is oncoming and hornlike then it is payable. Smart, sharp things are hornlike. If Phyllys is payable and Phyllys is wobbling then Phyllys is relative. Viviyan is relative.", "logic": "\nOncoming(jesus)\nGauzy(jesus)\nSharp(jesus)\nRelative(jesus)\nOncoming(phyllys)\nWobbling(phyllys)\nHornlike(phyllys)\nRelative(phyllys)\nWobbling(viviyan)\nGauzy(modestine)\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nHornlike(viviyan) -> Sharp(viviyan)\nforall x (Oncoming(x) and Hornlike(x) -> Payable(x))\nforall x (Relative(x) and Sharp(x) -> Hornlike(x))\nPayable(phyllys) and Wobbling(phyllys) -> Relative(phyllys)\n\nRelative(viviyan)\n\nRelative(viviyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1002"} {"premises": "The julian overstress the trixie. The julian congeal the trixie. The trixie overstress the julian. The trixie is pertinent. The trixie is casebook. The trixie congeal the julian. The trixie peek the julian. If something congeal the trixie and it is pertinent then it congeal the julian. If something overstress the trixie and it peek the julian then the julian peek the trixie. If the julian overstress the trixie and the julian peek the trixie then the julian congeal the trixie. If something overstress the julian then it overstress the trixie. If something overstress the julian then it is lutheran. If something peek the julian and it overstress the trixie then the julian congeal the trixie. If something peek the trixie and it overstress the trixie then it is lutheran. If something overstress the julian then the julian is pertinent. The trixie is casebook.", "logic": "\nOverstress(julian, trixie)\nCongeal(julian, trixie)\nOverstress(trixie, julian)\nPertinent(trixie)\nCasebook(trixie)\nCongeal(trixie, julian)\nPeek(trixie, julian)\nforall x (Congeal(x, trixie) and Pertinent(x) -> Congeal(x, julian))\nforall x (Overstress(x, trixie) and Peek(x, julian) -> Peek(julian, trixie))\nOverstress(julian, trixie) and Peek(julian, trixie) -> Congeal(julian, trixie)\nforall x (Overstress(x, julian) -> Overstress(x, trixie))\nforall x (Overstress(x, julian) -> Lutheran(x))\nforall x (Peek(x, julian) and Overstress(x, trixie) -> Congeal(julian, trixie))\nforall x (Peek(x, trixie) and Overstress(x, trixie) -> Lutheran(x))\nforall x (Overstress(x, julian) -> Pertinent(julian))\n\nCasebook(trixie)\n\ntherefore Casebook(trixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The ailey squat the stinky. The ailey obviate the stinky. The stinky squat the ailey. The stinky is combinable. The stinky is loamy. The stinky obviate the ailey. The stinky impair the ailey. If something obviate the stinky and it is combinable then it obviate the ailey. If something squat the stinky and it impair the ailey then the ailey impair the stinky. If the ailey squat the stinky and the ailey impair the stinky then the ailey obviate the stinky. If something squat the ailey then it squat the stinky. If something squat the ailey then it is evaporated. If something impair the ailey and it squat the stinky then the ailey obviate the stinky. If something impair the stinky and it squat the stinky then it is evaporated. If something squat the ailey then the ailey is combinable. The stinky does not see the ailey.", "logic": "\nSquat(ailey, stinky)\nObviate(ailey, stinky)\nSquat(stinky, ailey)\nCombinable(stinky)\nLoamy(stinky)\nObviate(stinky, ailey)\nImpair(stinky, ailey)\nforall x (Obviate(x, stinky) and Combinable(x) -> Obviate(x, ailey))\nforall x (Squat(x, stinky) and Impair(x, ailey) -> Impair(ailey, stinky))\nSquat(ailey, stinky) and Impair(ailey, stinky) -> Obviate(ailey, stinky)\nforall x (Squat(x, ailey) -> Squat(x, stinky))\nforall x (Squat(x, ailey) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Impair(x, ailey) and Squat(x, stinky) -> Obviate(ailey, stinky))\nforall x (Impair(x, stinky) and Squat(x, stinky) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Squat(x, ailey) -> Combinable(ailey))\n\nnot Impair(stinky, ailey)\n\ntherefore Impair(stinky, ailey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The rona rule the rutger. The rona ferret the rutger. The rutger rule the rona. The rutger is stative. The rutger is polyglot. The rutger ferret the rona. The rutger bronze the rona. If something ferret the rutger and it is stative then it ferret the rona. If something rule the rutger and it bronze the rona then the rona bronze the rutger. If the rona rule the rutger and the rona bronze the rutger then the rona ferret the rutger. If something rule the rona then it rule the rutger. If something rule the rona then it is noncaloric. If something bronze the rona and it rule the rutger then the rona ferret the rutger. If something bronze the rutger and it rule the rutger then it is noncaloric. If something rule the rona then the rona is stative. The rutger rule the rutger.", "logic": "\nRule(rona, rutger)\nFerret(rona, rutger)\nRule(rutger, rona)\nStative(rutger)\nPolyglot(rutger)\nFerret(rutger, rona)\nBronze(rutger, rona)\nforall x (Ferret(x, rutger) and Stative(x) -> Ferret(x, rona))\nforall x (Rule(x, rutger) and Bronze(x, rona) -> Bronze(rona, rutger))\nRule(rona, rutger) and Bronze(rona, rutger) -> Ferret(rona, rutger)\nforall x (Rule(x, rona) -> Rule(x, rutger))\nforall x (Rule(x, rona) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Bronze(x, rona) and Rule(x, rutger) -> Ferret(rona, rutger))\nforall x (Bronze(x, rutger) and Rule(x, rutger) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Rule(x, rona) -> Stative(rona))\n\nRule(rutger, rutger)\n\nRule(rutger, rona) and forall x (Rule(x, rona) -> Rule(x, rutger)) -> therefore Rule(rutger, rutger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The therine trudge the reyna. The therine inch the reyna. The reyna trudge the therine. The reyna is cherty. The reyna is poetic. The reyna inch the therine. The reyna reveal the therine. If something inch the reyna and it is cherty then it inch the therine. If something trudge the reyna and it reveal the therine then the therine reveal the reyna. If the therine trudge the reyna and the therine reveal the reyna then the therine inch the reyna. If something trudge the therine then it trudge the reyna. If something trudge the therine then it is nonuniform. If something reveal the therine and it trudge the reyna then the therine inch the reyna. If something reveal the reyna and it trudge the reyna then it is nonuniform. If something trudge the therine then the therine is cherty. The reyna does not chase the reyna.", "logic": "\nTrudge(therine, reyna)\nInch(therine, reyna)\nTrudge(reyna, therine)\nCherty(reyna)\nPoetic(reyna)\nInch(reyna, therine)\nReveal(reyna, therine)\nforall x (Inch(x, reyna) and Cherty(x) -> Inch(x, therine))\nforall x (Trudge(x, reyna) and Reveal(x, therine) -> Reveal(therine, reyna))\nTrudge(therine, reyna) and Reveal(therine, reyna) -> Inch(therine, reyna)\nforall x (Trudge(x, therine) -> Trudge(x, reyna))\nforall x (Trudge(x, therine) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Reveal(x, therine) and Trudge(x, reyna) -> Inch(therine, reyna))\nforall x (Reveal(x, reyna) and Trudge(x, reyna) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Trudge(x, therine) -> Cherty(therine))\n\nnot Trudge(reyna, reyna)\n\nTrudge(reyna, therine) and forall x (Trudge(x, therine) -> Trudge(x, reyna)) -> therefore Trudge(reyna, reyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The acacia sublimate the willey. The acacia party the willey. The willey sublimate the acacia. The willey is thriftless. The willey is hardcore. The willey party the acacia. The willey tweeze the acacia. If something party the willey and it is thriftless then it party the acacia. If something sublimate the willey and it tweeze the acacia then the acacia tweeze the willey. If the acacia sublimate the willey and the acacia tweeze the willey then the acacia party the willey. If something sublimate the acacia then it sublimate the willey. If something sublimate the acacia then it is skillful. If something tweeze the acacia and it sublimate the willey then the acacia party the willey. If something tweeze the willey and it sublimate the willey then it is skillful. If something sublimate the acacia then the acacia is thriftless. The acacia party the acacia.", "logic": "\nSublimate(acacia, willey)\nParty(acacia, willey)\nSublimate(willey, acacia)\nThriftless(willey)\nHardcore(willey)\nParty(willey, acacia)\nTweeze(willey, acacia)\nforall x (Party(x, willey) and Thriftless(x) -> Party(x, acacia))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, willey) and Tweeze(x, acacia) -> Tweeze(acacia, willey))\nSublimate(acacia, willey) and Tweeze(acacia, willey) -> Party(acacia, willey)\nforall x (Sublimate(x, acacia) -> Sublimate(x, willey))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, acacia) -> Skillful(x))\nforall x (Tweeze(x, acacia) and Sublimate(x, willey) -> Party(acacia, willey))\nforall x (Tweeze(x, willey) and Sublimate(x, willey) -> Skillful(x))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, acacia) -> Thriftless(acacia))\n\nParty(acacia, acacia)\n\nSublimate(willey, acacia) and forall x (Sublimate(x, acacia) -> Thriftless(acacia)) -> therefore Thriftless(acacia) Party(acacia, willey) and Thriftless(acacia) and forall x (Party(x, willey) and Thriftless(x) -> Party(x, acacia)) -> therefore Party(acacia, acacia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The star unharness the amelie. The star permute the amelie. The amelie unharness the star. The amelie is mesmerised. The amelie is supposable. The amelie permute the star. The amelie dismount the star. If something permute the amelie and it is mesmerised then it permute the star. If something unharness the amelie and it dismount the star then the star dismount the amelie. If the star unharness the amelie and the star dismount the amelie then the star permute the amelie. If something unharness the star then it unharness the amelie. If something unharness the star then it is amyloid. If something dismount the star and it unharness the amelie then the star permute the amelie. If something dismount the amelie and it unharness the amelie then it is amyloid. If something unharness the star then the star is mesmerised. The star does not see the amelie.", "logic": "\nUnharness(star, amelie)\nPermute(star, amelie)\nUnharness(amelie, star)\nMesmerised(amelie)\nSupposable(amelie)\nPermute(amelie, star)\nDismount(amelie, star)\nforall x (Permute(x, amelie) and Mesmerised(x) -> Permute(x, star))\nforall x (Unharness(x, amelie) and Dismount(x, star) -> Dismount(star, amelie))\nUnharness(star, amelie) and Dismount(star, amelie) -> Permute(star, amelie)\nforall x (Unharness(x, star) -> Unharness(x, amelie))\nforall x (Unharness(x, star) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Dismount(x, star) and Unharness(x, amelie) -> Permute(star, amelie))\nforall x (Dismount(x, amelie) and Unharness(x, amelie) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Unharness(x, star) -> Mesmerised(star))\n\nnot Dismount(star, amelie)\n\nUnharness(amelie, star) and forall x (Unharness(x, star) -> Unharness(x, amelie)) -> therefore Unharness(amelie, amelie) Unharness(amelie, amelie) and Dismount(amelie, star) and forall x (Unharness(x, amelie) and Dismount(x, star) -> Dismount(star, amelie)) -> therefore Dismount(star, amelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The bari scissor the flori. The bari jackrabbit the flori. The flori scissor the bari. The flori is brisk. The flori is tantric. The flori jackrabbit the bari. The flori childproof the bari. If something jackrabbit the flori and it is brisk then it jackrabbit the bari. If something scissor the flori and it childproof the bari then the bari childproof the flori. If the bari scissor the flori and the bari childproof the flori then the bari jackrabbit the flori. If something scissor the bari then it scissor the flori. If something scissor the bari then it is maniclike. If something childproof the bari and it scissor the flori then the bari jackrabbit the flori. If something childproof the flori and it scissor the flori then it is maniclike. If something scissor the bari then the bari is brisk. The bari is maniclike.", "logic": "\nScissor(bari, flori)\nJackrabbit(bari, flori)\nScissor(flori, bari)\nBrisk(flori)\nTantric(flori)\nJackrabbit(flori, bari)\nChildproof(flori, bari)\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, flori) and Brisk(x) -> Jackrabbit(x, bari))\nforall x (Scissor(x, flori) and Childproof(x, bari) -> Childproof(bari, flori))\nScissor(bari, flori) and Childproof(bari, flori) -> Jackrabbit(bari, flori)\nforall x (Scissor(x, bari) -> Scissor(x, flori))\nforall x (Scissor(x, bari) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Childproof(x, bari) and Scissor(x, flori) -> Jackrabbit(bari, flori))\nforall x (Childproof(x, flori) and Scissor(x, flori) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Scissor(x, bari) -> Brisk(bari))\n\nManiclike(bari)\n\nScissor(flori, bari) and forall x (Scissor(x, bari) -> Scissor(x, flori)) -> therefore Scissor(flori, flori) Scissor(flori, flori) and Childproof(flori, bari) and forall x (Scissor(x, flori) and Childproof(x, bari) -> Childproof(bari, flori)) -> therefore Childproof(bari, flori) Childproof(bari, flori) and Scissor(bari, flori) and forall x (Childproof(x, flori) and Scissor(x, flori) -> Maniclike(x)) -> therefore Maniclike(bari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The izaak hone the sammy. The izaak interpret the sammy. The sammy hone the izaak. The sammy is phoney. The sammy is blatant. The sammy interpret the izaak. The sammy spirt the izaak. If something interpret the sammy and it is phoney then it interpret the izaak. If something hone the sammy and it spirt the izaak then the izaak spirt the sammy. If the izaak hone the sammy and the izaak spirt the sammy then the izaak interpret the sammy. If something hone the izaak then it hone the sammy. If something hone the izaak then it is fairish. If something spirt the izaak and it hone the sammy then the izaak interpret the sammy. If something spirt the sammy and it hone the sammy then it is fairish. If something hone the izaak then the izaak is phoney. The izaak is not fairish.", "logic": "\nHone(izaak, sammy)\nInterpret(izaak, sammy)\nHone(sammy, izaak)\nPhoney(sammy)\nBlatant(sammy)\nInterpret(sammy, izaak)\nSpirt(sammy, izaak)\nforall x (Interpret(x, sammy) and Phoney(x) -> Interpret(x, izaak))\nforall x (Hone(x, sammy) and Spirt(x, izaak) -> Spirt(izaak, sammy))\nHone(izaak, sammy) and Spirt(izaak, sammy) -> Interpret(izaak, sammy)\nforall x (Hone(x, izaak) -> Hone(x, sammy))\nforall x (Hone(x, izaak) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Spirt(x, izaak) and Hone(x, sammy) -> Interpret(izaak, sammy))\nforall x (Spirt(x, sammy) and Hone(x, sammy) -> Fairish(x))\nforall x (Hone(x, izaak) -> Phoney(izaak))\n\nnot Fairish(izaak)\n\nHone(sammy, izaak) and forall x (Hone(x, izaak) -> Hone(x, sammy)) -> therefore Hone(sammy, sammy) Hone(sammy, sammy) and Spirt(sammy, izaak) and forall x (Hone(x, sammy) and Spirt(x, izaak) -> Spirt(izaak, sammy)) -> therefore Spirt(izaak, sammy) Spirt(izaak, sammy) and Hone(izaak, sammy) and forall x (Spirt(x, sammy) and Hone(x, sammy) -> Fairish(x)) -> therefore Fairish(izaak)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The ema overwrite the welsh. The ema lysogenize the welsh. The welsh overwrite the ema. The welsh is edgy. The welsh is groping. The welsh lysogenize the ema. The welsh wager the ema. If something lysogenize the welsh and it is edgy then it lysogenize the ema. If something overwrite the welsh and it wager the ema then the ema wager the welsh. If the ema overwrite the welsh and the ema wager the welsh then the ema lysogenize the welsh. If something overwrite the ema then it overwrite the welsh. If something overwrite the ema then it is inhabited. If something wager the ema and it overwrite the welsh then the ema lysogenize the welsh. If something wager the welsh and it overwrite the welsh then it is inhabited. If something overwrite the ema then the ema is edgy. The welsh is not round.", "logic": "\nOverwrite(ema, welsh)\nLysogenize(ema, welsh)\nOverwrite(welsh, ema)\nEdgy(welsh)\nGroping(welsh)\nLysogenize(welsh, ema)\nWager(welsh, ema)\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, welsh) and Edgy(x) -> Lysogenize(x, ema))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, welsh) and Wager(x, ema) -> Wager(ema, welsh))\nOverwrite(ema, welsh) and Wager(ema, welsh) -> Lysogenize(ema, welsh)\nforall x (Overwrite(x, ema) -> Overwrite(x, welsh))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, ema) -> Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Wager(x, ema) and Overwrite(x, welsh) -> Lysogenize(ema, welsh))\nforall x (Wager(x, welsh) and Overwrite(x, welsh) -> Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, ema) -> Edgy(ema))\n\nnot Round(welsh)\n\nnot Round(welsh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The hillary refund the klara. The hillary alarm the klara. The klara refund the hillary. The klara is primal. The klara is epidermic. The klara alarm the hillary. The klara backtrack the hillary. If something alarm the klara and it is primal then it alarm the hillary. If something refund the klara and it backtrack the hillary then the hillary backtrack the klara. If the hillary refund the klara and the hillary backtrack the klara then the hillary alarm the klara. If something refund the hillary then it refund the klara. If something refund the hillary then it is clipped. If something backtrack the hillary and it refund the klara then the hillary alarm the klara. If something backtrack the klara and it refund the klara then it is clipped. If something refund the hillary then the hillary is primal. The klara is kind.", "logic": "\nRefund(hillary, klara)\nAlarm(hillary, klara)\nRefund(klara, hillary)\nPrimal(klara)\nEpidermic(klara)\nAlarm(klara, hillary)\nBacktrack(klara, hillary)\nforall x (Alarm(x, klara) and Primal(x) -> Alarm(x, hillary))\nforall x (Refund(x, klara) and Backtrack(x, hillary) -> Backtrack(hillary, klara))\nRefund(hillary, klara) and Backtrack(hillary, klara) -> Alarm(hillary, klara)\nforall x (Refund(x, hillary) -> Refund(x, klara))\nforall x (Refund(x, hillary) -> Clipped(x))\nforall x (Backtrack(x, hillary) and Refund(x, klara) -> Alarm(hillary, klara))\nforall x (Backtrack(x, klara) and Refund(x, klara) -> Clipped(x))\nforall x (Refund(x, hillary) -> Primal(hillary))\n\nKind(klara)\n\nKind(klara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The anya squat the rivkah. The anya scalp the rivkah. The rivkah squat the anya. The rivkah is cosmogonic. The rivkah is bodied. The rivkah scalp the anya. The rivkah tabularise the anya. If something scalp the rivkah and it is cosmogonic then it scalp the anya. If something squat the rivkah and it tabularise the anya then the anya tabularise the rivkah. If the anya squat the rivkah and the anya tabularise the rivkah then the anya scalp the rivkah. If something squat the anya then it squat the rivkah. If something squat the anya then it is veterinary. If something tabularise the anya and it squat the rivkah then the anya scalp the rivkah. If something tabularise the rivkah and it squat the rivkah then it is veterinary. If something squat the anya then the anya is cosmogonic. The anya is not bodied.", "logic": "\nSquat(anya, rivkah)\nScalp(anya, rivkah)\nSquat(rivkah, anya)\nCosmogonic(rivkah)\nBodied(rivkah)\nScalp(rivkah, anya)\nTabularise(rivkah, anya)\nforall x (Scalp(x, rivkah) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Scalp(x, anya))\nforall x (Squat(x, rivkah) and Tabularise(x, anya) -> Tabularise(anya, rivkah))\nSquat(anya, rivkah) and Tabularise(anya, rivkah) -> Scalp(anya, rivkah)\nforall x (Squat(x, anya) -> Squat(x, rivkah))\nforall x (Squat(x, anya) -> Veterinary(x))\nforall x (Tabularise(x, anya) and Squat(x, rivkah) -> Scalp(anya, rivkah))\nforall x (Tabularise(x, rivkah) and Squat(x, rivkah) -> Veterinary(x))\nforall x (Squat(x, anya) -> Cosmogonic(anya))\n\nnot Bodied(anya)\n\nnot Bodied(anya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The jillene exorcise the lara. The jillene bespeckle the lara. The lara exorcise the jillene. The lara is absolutist. The lara is illicit. The lara bespeckle the jillene. The lara desalt the jillene. If something bespeckle the lara and it is absolutist then it bespeckle the jillene. If something exorcise the lara and it desalt the jillene then the jillene desalt the lara. If the jillene exorcise the lara and the jillene desalt the lara then the jillene bespeckle the lara. If something exorcise the jillene then it exorcise the lara. If something exorcise the jillene then it is prepaid. If something desalt the jillene and it exorcise the lara then the jillene bespeckle the lara. If something desalt the lara and it exorcise the lara then it is prepaid. If something exorcise the jillene then the jillene is absolutist. The jillene is round.", "logic": "\nExorcise(jillene, lara)\nBespeckle(jillene, lara)\nExorcise(lara, jillene)\nAbsolutist(lara)\nIllicit(lara)\nBespeckle(lara, jillene)\nDesalt(lara, jillene)\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, lara) and Absolutist(x) -> Bespeckle(x, jillene))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, lara) and Desalt(x, jillene) -> Desalt(jillene, lara))\nExorcise(jillene, lara) and Desalt(jillene, lara) -> Bespeckle(jillene, lara)\nforall x (Exorcise(x, jillene) -> Exorcise(x, lara))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, jillene) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Desalt(x, jillene) and Exorcise(x, lara) -> Bespeckle(jillene, lara))\nforall x (Desalt(x, lara) and Exorcise(x, lara) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, jillene) -> Absolutist(jillene))\n\nRound(jillene)\n\nRound(jillene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The gwenny wamble the locke. The gwenny geminate the locke. The locke wamble the gwenny. The locke is immature. The locke is dioestrual. The locke geminate the gwenny. The locke flatter the gwenny. If something geminate the locke and it is immature then it geminate the gwenny. If something wamble the locke and it flatter the gwenny then the gwenny flatter the locke. If the gwenny wamble the locke and the gwenny flatter the locke then the gwenny geminate the locke. If something wamble the gwenny then it wamble the locke. If something wamble the gwenny then it is stentorian. If something flatter the gwenny and it wamble the locke then the gwenny geminate the locke. If something flatter the locke and it wamble the locke then it is stentorian. If something wamble the gwenny then the gwenny is immature. The locke does not see the locke.", "logic": "\nWamble(gwenny, locke)\nGeminate(gwenny, locke)\nWamble(locke, gwenny)\nImmature(locke)\nDioestrual(locke)\nGeminate(locke, gwenny)\nFlatter(locke, gwenny)\nforall x (Geminate(x, locke) and Immature(x) -> Geminate(x, gwenny))\nforall x (Wamble(x, locke) and Flatter(x, gwenny) -> Flatter(gwenny, locke))\nWamble(gwenny, locke) and Flatter(gwenny, locke) -> Geminate(gwenny, locke)\nforall x (Wamble(x, gwenny) -> Wamble(x, locke))\nforall x (Wamble(x, gwenny) -> Stentorian(x))\nforall x (Flatter(x, gwenny) and Wamble(x, locke) -> Geminate(gwenny, locke))\nforall x (Flatter(x, locke) and Wamble(x, locke) -> Stentorian(x))\nforall x (Wamble(x, gwenny) -> Immature(gwenny))\n\nnot Flatter(locke, locke)\n\nnot Flatter(locke, locke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The bernita miff the rosie. The bernita capsulise the rosie. The rosie miff the bernita. The rosie is unsilenced. The rosie is despotic. The rosie capsulise the bernita. The rosie brave the bernita. If something capsulise the rosie and it is unsilenced then it capsulise the bernita. If something miff the rosie and it brave the bernita then the bernita brave the rosie. If the bernita miff the rosie and the bernita brave the rosie then the bernita capsulise the rosie. If something miff the bernita then it miff the rosie. If something miff the bernita then it is subclavian. If something brave the bernita and it miff the rosie then the bernita capsulise the rosie. If something brave the rosie and it miff the rosie then it is subclavian. If something miff the bernita then the bernita is unsilenced. The bernita miff the bernita.", "logic": "\nMiff(bernita, rosie)\nCapsulise(bernita, rosie)\nMiff(rosie, bernita)\nUnsilenced(rosie)\nDespotic(rosie)\nCapsulise(rosie, bernita)\nBrave(rosie, bernita)\nforall x (Capsulise(x, rosie) and Unsilenced(x) -> Capsulise(x, bernita))\nforall x (Miff(x, rosie) and Brave(x, bernita) -> Brave(bernita, rosie))\nMiff(bernita, rosie) and Brave(bernita, rosie) -> Capsulise(bernita, rosie)\nforall x (Miff(x, bernita) -> Miff(x, rosie))\nforall x (Miff(x, bernita) -> Subclavian(x))\nforall x (Brave(x, bernita) and Miff(x, rosie) -> Capsulise(bernita, rosie))\nforall x (Brave(x, rosie) and Miff(x, rosie) -> Subclavian(x))\nforall x (Miff(x, bernita) -> Unsilenced(bernita))\n\nMiff(bernita, bernita)\n\nMiff(bernita, bernita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The anthe tope the sean. The anthe bide the sean. The sean tope the anthe. The sean is minute. The sean is immanent. The sean bide the anthe. The sean occult the anthe. If something bide the sean and it is minute then it bide the anthe. If something tope the sean and it occult the anthe then the anthe occult the sean. If the anthe tope the sean and the anthe occult the sean then the anthe bide the sean. If something tope the anthe then it tope the sean. If something tope the anthe then it is polydactyl. If something occult the anthe and it tope the sean then the anthe bide the sean. If something occult the sean and it tope the sean then it is polydactyl. If something tope the anthe then the anthe is minute. The sean does not like the sean.", "logic": "\nTope(anthe, sean)\nBide(anthe, sean)\nTope(sean, anthe)\nMinute(sean)\nImmanent(sean)\nBide(sean, anthe)\nOccult(sean, anthe)\nforall x (Bide(x, sean) and Minute(x) -> Bide(x, anthe))\nforall x (Tope(x, sean) and Occult(x, anthe) -> Occult(anthe, sean))\nTope(anthe, sean) and Occult(anthe, sean) -> Bide(anthe, sean)\nforall x (Tope(x, anthe) -> Tope(x, sean))\nforall x (Tope(x, anthe) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Occult(x, anthe) and Tope(x, sean) -> Bide(anthe, sean))\nforall x (Occult(x, sean) and Tope(x, sean) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Tope(x, anthe) -> Minute(anthe))\n\nnot Bide(sean, sean)\n\nnot Bide(sean, sean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "The keslie tower the amie. The keslie glaciate the amie. The amie tower the keslie. The amie is isopteran. The amie is juvenile. The amie glaciate the keslie. The amie lull the keslie. If something glaciate the amie and it is isopteran then it glaciate the keslie. If something tower the amie and it lull the keslie then the keslie lull the amie. If the keslie tower the amie and the keslie lull the amie then the keslie glaciate the amie. If something tower the keslie then it tower the amie. If something tower the keslie then it is luxuriant. If something lull the keslie and it tower the amie then the keslie glaciate the amie. If something lull the amie and it tower the amie then it is luxuriant. If something tower the keslie then the keslie is isopteran. The keslie is kind.", "logic": "\nTower(keslie, amie)\nGlaciate(keslie, amie)\nTower(amie, keslie)\nIsopteran(amie)\nJuvenile(amie)\nGlaciate(amie, keslie)\nLull(amie, keslie)\nforall x (Glaciate(x, amie) and Isopteran(x) -> Glaciate(x, keslie))\nforall x (Tower(x, amie) and Lull(x, keslie) -> Lull(keslie, amie))\nTower(keslie, amie) and Lull(keslie, amie) -> Glaciate(keslie, amie)\nforall x (Tower(x, keslie) -> Tower(x, amie))\nforall x (Tower(x, keslie) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Lull(x, keslie) and Tower(x, amie) -> Glaciate(keslie, amie))\nforall x (Lull(x, amie) and Tower(x, amie) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Tower(x, keslie) -> Isopteran(keslie))\n\nKind(keslie)\n\nKind(keslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Odysseus is seedless. Odysseus is camp. Cindie is argentous. Cindie is thrilling. Cindie is drunken. Jeane is skew. Jeane is argentous. Jeane is thrilling. Jeane is woollen. Jeane is drunken. Jeane is seedless. Jeane is camp. If Jeane is thrilling and Jeane is woollen then Jeane is drunken. Cindie is drunken.", "logic": "\nSeedless(odysseus)\nCamp(odysseus)\nArgentous(cindie)\nThrilling(cindie)\nDrunken(cindie)\nSkew(jeane)\nArgentous(jeane)\nThrilling(jeane)\nWoollen(jeane)\nDrunken(jeane)\nSeedless(jeane)\nCamp(jeane)\nThrilling(jeane) and Woollen(jeane) -> Drunken(jeane)\n\nDrunken(cindie)\n\ntherefore Drunken(cindie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-111"} {"premises": "Hinda is hectic. Hinda is atrophied. Ursola is natural. Ursola is redbrick. Ursola is baffled. Penrod is dacitic. Penrod is natural. Penrod is redbrick. Penrod is mesial. Penrod is baffled. Penrod is hectic. Penrod is atrophied. If Penrod is redbrick and Penrod is mesial then Penrod is baffled. Penrod is not baffled.", "logic": "\nHectic(hinda)\nAtrophied(hinda)\nNatural(ursola)\nRedbrick(ursola)\nBaffled(ursola)\nDacitic(penrod)\nNatural(penrod)\nRedbrick(penrod)\nMesial(penrod)\nBaffled(penrod)\nHectic(penrod)\nAtrophied(penrod)\nRedbrick(penrod) and Mesial(penrod) -> Baffled(penrod)\n\nnot Baffled(penrod)\n\ntherefore Baffled(penrod)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-111"} {"premises": "Valerye is ablative. Valerye is shifty. Rodrique is bald. Rodrique is shinto. Rodrique is unpatented. Cyrus is blind. Cyrus is bald. Cyrus is shinto. Cyrus is blockish. Cyrus is unpatented. Cyrus is ablative. Cyrus is shifty. If Cyrus is shinto and Cyrus is blockish then Cyrus is unpatented. Valerye is not blockish.", "logic": "\nAblative(valerye)\nShifty(valerye)\nBald(rodrique)\nShinto(rodrique)\nUnpatented(rodrique)\nBlind(cyrus)\nBald(cyrus)\nShinto(cyrus)\nBlockish(cyrus)\nUnpatented(cyrus)\nAblative(cyrus)\nShifty(cyrus)\nShinto(cyrus) and Blockish(cyrus) -> Unpatented(cyrus)\n\nnot Blockish(valerye)\n\nnot Blockish(valerye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-111"} {"premises": "Stafani is unfunded. Stafani is predacious. Raymond is turbid. Raymond is periodical. Raymond is lively. Von is lengthy. Von is turbid. Von is periodical. Von is spendable. Von is lively. Von is unfunded. Von is predacious. If Von is periodical and Von is spendable then Von is lively. Stafani is lengthy.", "logic": "\nUnfunded(stafani)\nPredacious(stafani)\nTurbid(raymond)\nPeriodical(raymond)\nLively(raymond)\nLengthy(von)\nTurbid(von)\nPeriodical(von)\nSpendable(von)\nLively(von)\nUnfunded(von)\nPredacious(von)\nPeriodical(von) and Spendable(von) -> Lively(von)\n\nLengthy(stafani)\n\nLengthy(stafani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-111"} {"premises": "Kory is apsidal. Kory is masterful. Alyss is shorthand. Alyss is weeping. Alyss is hostile. Drew is apsidal. Drew is masterful. If someone is apsidal and numeric then they are shorthand. White people are shorthand. If someone is apsidal then they are shorthand. All numeric people are shorthand. If someone is apsidal and shorthand then they are numeric. All shorthand people are hostile. Nice, weeping people are masterful. White people are ethnical. Kory is masterful.", "logic": "\nApsidal(kory)\nMasterful(kory)\nShorthand(alyss)\nWeeping(alyss)\nHostile(alyss)\nApsidal(drew)\nMasterful(drew)\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and Numeric(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Numeric(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Weeping(x) -> Masterful(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Ethnical(x))\n\nMasterful(kory)\n\ntherefore Masterful(kory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Butch is nullified. Butch is airsick. Bea is coseismal. Bea is alone. Bea is insecure. Hyatt is nullified. Hyatt is airsick. If someone is nullified and argive then they are coseismal. White people are coseismal. If someone is nullified then they are coseismal. All argive people are coseismal. If someone is nullified and coseismal then they are argive. All coseismal people are insecure. Nice, alone people are airsick. White people are periwigged. Hyatt is not airsick.", "logic": "\nNullified(butch)\nAirsick(butch)\nCoseismal(bea)\nAlone(bea)\nInsecure(bea)\nNullified(hyatt)\nAirsick(hyatt)\nforall x (Nullified(x) and Argive(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Insecure(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Nullified(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Argive(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Nullified(x) and Coseismal(x) -> Argive(x))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) -> Insecure(x))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) and Alone(x) -> Airsick(x))\nforall x (Insecure(x) -> Periwigged(x))\n\nnot Airsick(hyatt)\n\ntherefore Airsick(hyatt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Florette is hyaloid. Florette is diverse. Noe is formidable. Noe is dimorphic. Noe is respective. Jordan is hyaloid. Jordan is diverse. If someone is hyaloid and charnel then they are formidable. White people are formidable. If someone is hyaloid then they are formidable. All charnel people are formidable. If someone is hyaloid and formidable then they are charnel. All formidable people are respective. Nice, dimorphic people are diverse. White people are bantoid. Florette is formidable.", "logic": "\nHyaloid(florette)\nDiverse(florette)\nFormidable(noe)\nDimorphic(noe)\nRespective(noe)\nHyaloid(jordan)\nDiverse(jordan)\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Charnel(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Charnel(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Formidable(x) -> Charnel(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and Dimorphic(x) -> Diverse(x))\nforall x (Respective(x) -> Bantoid(x))\n\nFormidable(florette)\n\nHyaloid(florette) and forall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Formidable(x)) -> therefore Formidable(florette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Oneida is hasidic. Oneida is acapnotic. Gwenora is bankable. Gwenora is caucasic. Gwenora is arithmetic. Chauncey is hasidic. Chauncey is acapnotic. If someone is hasidic and sinless then they are bankable. White people are bankable. If someone is hasidic then they are bankable. All sinless people are bankable. If someone is hasidic and bankable then they are sinless. All bankable people are arithmetic. Nice, caucasic people are acapnotic. White people are misused. Chauncey is not bankable.", "logic": "\nHasidic(oneida)\nAcapnotic(oneida)\nBankable(gwenora)\nCaucasic(gwenora)\nArithmetic(gwenora)\nHasidic(chauncey)\nAcapnotic(chauncey)\nforall x (Hasidic(x) and Sinless(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Hasidic(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Sinless(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Hasidic(x) and Bankable(x) -> Sinless(x))\nforall x (Bankable(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Bankable(x) and Caucasic(x) -> Acapnotic(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Misused(x))\n\nnot Bankable(chauncey)\n\nHasidic(chauncey) and forall x (Hasidic(x) -> Bankable(x)) -> therefore Bankable(chauncey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Kaleena is fourscore. Kaleena is torturing. Raf is unhindered. Raf is husky. Raf is discarded. Rudd is fourscore. Rudd is torturing. If someone is fourscore and adulterate then they are unhindered. White people are unhindered. If someone is fourscore then they are unhindered. All adulterate people are unhindered. If someone is fourscore and unhindered then they are adulterate. All unhindered people are discarded. Nice, husky people are torturing. White people are failing. Kaleena is adulterate.", "logic": "\nFourscore(kaleena)\nTorturing(kaleena)\nUnhindered(raf)\nHusky(raf)\nDiscarded(raf)\nFourscore(rudd)\nTorturing(rudd)\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Adulterate(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Discarded(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Adulterate(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Unhindered(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Discarded(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and Husky(x) -> Torturing(x))\nforall x (Discarded(x) -> Failing(x))\n\nAdulterate(kaleena)\n\nFourscore(kaleena) and forall x (Fourscore(x) -> Unhindered(x)) -> therefore Unhindered(kaleena) Fourscore(kaleena) and Unhindered(kaleena) and forall x (Fourscore(x) and Unhindered(x) -> Adulterate(x)) -> therefore Adulterate(kaleena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Corly is mulish. Corly is numerate. Babette is loverlike. Babette is unspoken. Babette is homemade. Ernst is mulish. Ernst is numerate. If someone is mulish and forfeit then they are loverlike. White people are loverlike. If someone is mulish then they are loverlike. All forfeit people are loverlike. If someone is mulish and loverlike then they are forfeit. All loverlike people are homemade. Nice, unspoken people are numerate. White people are guttural. Corly is not forfeit.", "logic": "\nMulish(corly)\nNumerate(corly)\nLoverlike(babette)\nUnspoken(babette)\nHomemade(babette)\nMulish(ernst)\nNumerate(ernst)\nforall x (Mulish(x) and Forfeit(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Homemade(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) and Loverlike(x) -> Forfeit(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Homemade(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and Unspoken(x) -> Numerate(x))\nforall x (Homemade(x) -> Guttural(x))\n\nnot Forfeit(corly)\n\nMulish(corly) and forall x (Mulish(x) -> Loverlike(x)) -> therefore Loverlike(corly) Mulish(corly) and Loverlike(corly) and forall x (Mulish(x) and Loverlike(x) -> Forfeit(x)) -> therefore Forfeit(corly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Nell is puzzling. Nell is heatable. Micky is winsome. Micky is auricular. Micky is honorary. Mahala is puzzling. Mahala is heatable. If someone is puzzling and ilxxx then they are winsome. White people are winsome. If someone is puzzling then they are winsome. All ilxxx people are winsome. If someone is puzzling and winsome then they are ilxxx. All winsome people are honorary. Nice, auricular people are heatable. White people are alterative. Nell is alterative.", "logic": "\nPuzzling(nell)\nHeatable(nell)\nWinsome(micky)\nAuricular(micky)\nHonorary(micky)\nPuzzling(mahala)\nHeatable(mahala)\nforall x (Puzzling(x) and Ilxxx(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Honorary(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Ilxxx(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) and Winsome(x) -> Ilxxx(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) -> Honorary(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Auricular(x) -> Heatable(x))\nforall x (Honorary(x) -> Alterative(x))\n\nAlterative(nell)\n\nPuzzling(nell) and forall x (Puzzling(x) -> Winsome(x)) -> therefore Winsome(nell) Winsome(nell) and forall x (Winsome(x) -> Honorary(x)) -> therefore Honorary(nell) Honorary(nell) and forall x (Honorary(x) -> Alterative(x)) -> therefore Alterative(nell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Trula is loveable. Trula is israeli. Emmy is gigantic. Emmy is eonian. Emmy is exemplary. Tildi is loveable. Tildi is israeli. If someone is loveable and headlike then they are gigantic. White people are gigantic. If someone is loveable then they are gigantic. All headlike people are gigantic. If someone is loveable and gigantic then they are headlike. All gigantic people are exemplary. Nice, eonian people are israeli. White people are amort. Trula is not amort.", "logic": "\nLoveable(trula)\nIsraeli(trula)\nGigantic(emmy)\nEonian(emmy)\nExemplary(emmy)\nLoveable(tildi)\nIsraeli(tildi)\nforall x (Loveable(x) and Headlike(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Exemplary(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Loveable(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Headlike(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Loveable(x) and Gigantic(x) -> Headlike(x))\nforall x (Gigantic(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Gigantic(x) and Eonian(x) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Exemplary(x) -> Amort(x))\n\nnot Amort(trula)\n\nLoveable(trula) and forall x (Loveable(x) -> Gigantic(x)) -> therefore Gigantic(trula) Gigantic(trula) and forall x (Gigantic(x) -> Exemplary(x)) -> therefore Exemplary(trula) Exemplary(trula) and forall x (Exemplary(x) -> Amort(x)) -> therefore Amort(trula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Lawson is rescued. Lawson is disabling. Iggy is bitchy. Iggy is shoddy. Iggy is vast. Harold is rescued. Harold is disabling. If someone is rescued and outcast then they are bitchy. White people are bitchy. If someone is rescued then they are bitchy. All outcast people are bitchy. If someone is rescued and bitchy then they are outcast. All bitchy people are vast. Nice, shoddy people are disabling. White people are biaural. Iggy is not outcast.", "logic": "\nRescued(lawson)\nDisabling(lawson)\nBitchy(iggy)\nShoddy(iggy)\nVast(iggy)\nRescued(harold)\nDisabling(harold)\nforall x (Rescued(x) and Outcast(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Rescued(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Outcast(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Rescued(x) and Bitchy(x) -> Outcast(x))\nforall x (Bitchy(x) -> Vast(x))\nforall x (Bitchy(x) and Shoddy(x) -> Disabling(x))\nforall x (Vast(x) -> Biaural(x))\n\nnot Outcast(iggy)\n\nforall x (Rescued(x) and Bitchy(x) -> Outcast(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Camala is undaunted. Camala is unmoved. Prentice is arboresque. Prentice is pathless. Prentice is pugilistic. Aylmer is undaunted. Aylmer is unmoved. If someone is undaunted and localised then they are arboresque. White people are arboresque. If someone is undaunted then they are arboresque. All localised people are arboresque. If someone is undaunted and arboresque then they are localised. All arboresque people are pugilistic. Nice, pathless people are unmoved. White people are sudanese. Aylmer is pathless.", "logic": "\nUndaunted(camala)\nUnmoved(camala)\nArboresque(prentice)\nPathless(prentice)\nPugilistic(prentice)\nUndaunted(aylmer)\nUnmoved(aylmer)\nforall x (Undaunted(x) and Localised(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Undaunted(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Undaunted(x) and Arboresque(x) -> Localised(x))\nforall x (Arboresque(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Arboresque(x) and Pathless(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> Sudanese(x))\n\nPathless(aylmer)\n\nPathless(aylmer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Eleonora is unpaved. Eleonora is momentary. Bellanca is tertian. Bellanca is unprepared. Bellanca is burundi. Walsh is unpaved. Walsh is momentary. If someone is unpaved and prefab then they are tertian. White people are tertian. If someone is unpaved then they are tertian. All prefab people are tertian. If someone is unpaved and tertian then they are prefab. All tertian people are burundi. Nice, unprepared people are momentary. White people are unpatented. Bellanca is not unpaved.", "logic": "\nUnpaved(eleonora)\nMomentary(eleonora)\nTertian(bellanca)\nUnprepared(bellanca)\nBurundi(bellanca)\nUnpaved(walsh)\nMomentary(walsh)\nforall x (Unpaved(x) and Prefab(x) -> Tertian(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) -> Tertian(x))\nforall x (Unpaved(x) -> Tertian(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Tertian(x))\nforall x (Unpaved(x) and Tertian(x) -> Prefab(x))\nforall x (Tertian(x) -> Burundi(x))\nforall x (Tertian(x) and Unprepared(x) -> Momentary(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) -> Unpatented(x))\n\nnot Unpaved(bellanca)\n\nnot Unpaved(bellanca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Seline is antithetic. Seline is uncarpeted. Adena is extravert. Adena is tantamount. Adena is sedulous. Ingeberg is antithetic. Ingeberg is uncarpeted. If someone is antithetic and built then they are extravert. White people are extravert. If someone is antithetic then they are extravert. All built people are extravert. If someone is antithetic and extravert then they are built. All extravert people are sedulous. Nice, tantamount people are uncarpeted. White people are fetid. Seline is tantamount.", "logic": "\nAntithetic(seline)\nUncarpeted(seline)\nExtravert(adena)\nTantamount(adena)\nSedulous(adena)\nAntithetic(ingeberg)\nUncarpeted(ingeberg)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) and Built(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Built(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Antithetic(x) and Extravert(x) -> Built(x))\nforall x (Extravert(x) -> Sedulous(x))\nforall x (Extravert(x) and Tantamount(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) -> Fetid(x))\n\nTantamount(seline)\n\nTantamount(seline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Adrienne is half. Babs is strapless. Madelle is steamy. Klarrisa is upstairs. Kind people are not severe. Babs is strapless.", "logic": "\nHalf(adrienne)\nStrapless(babs)\nSteamy(madelle)\nUpstairs(klarrisa)\nforall x (Steamy(x) -> not Severe(x))\n\nStrapless(babs)\n\ntherefore Strapless(babs)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "Don is breeding. Indira is handy. Alma is sublunar. Harri is avocado. Kind people are not cyanogenic. Alma is not sublunar.", "logic": "\nBreeding(don)\nHandy(indira)\nSublunar(alma)\nAvocado(harri)\nforall x (Sublunar(x) -> not Cyanogenic(x))\n\nnot Sublunar(alma)\n\ntherefore Sublunar(alma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "Coralyn is djiboutian. Pierce is tested. Helena is civil. Theodore is afflictive. Kind people are not olfactory. Helena is not olfactory.", "logic": "\nDjiboutian(coralyn)\nTested(pierce)\nCivil(helena)\nAfflictive(theodore)\nforall x (Civil(x) -> not Olfactory(x))\n\nnot Olfactory(helena)\n\nCivil(helena) and forall x (Civil(x) -> not Olfactory(x)) -> therefore not Olfactory(helena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "Aurilia is benefic. Elvis is monoecious. Gusella is buckshee. Bary is next. Kind people are not petalous. Gusella is petalous.", "logic": "\nBenefic(aurilia)\nMonoecious(elvis)\nBuckshee(gusella)\nNext(bary)\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> not Petalous(x))\n\nPetalous(gusella)\n\nBuckshee(gusella) and forall x (Buckshee(x) -> not Petalous(x)) -> therefore not Petalous(gusella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "Carla is humongous. Eva is sellable. Augustin is finite. Anneliese is antidromic. Kind people are not uppermost. Augustin is not white.", "logic": "\nHumongous(carla)\nSellable(eva)\nFinite(augustin)\nAntidromic(anneliese)\nforall x (Finite(x) -> not Uppermost(x))\n\nnot White(augustin)\n\nnot White(augustin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "Antonella is roofed. Alvinia is nighted. Valentia is basaltic. Dulciana is decurved. Kind people are not clannish. Dulciana is nighted.", "logic": "\nRoofed(antonella)\nNighted(alvinia)\nBasaltic(valentia)\nDecurved(dulciana)\nforall x (Basaltic(x) -> not Clannish(x))\n\nNighted(dulciana)\n\nNighted(dulciana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "Liana is granulated. Nicky is vitiated. Marshal is asserted. Alain is halcyon. Kind people are not yokelish. Liana is not yokelish.", "logic": "\nGranulated(liana)\nVitiated(nicky)\nAsserted(marshal)\nHalcyon(alain)\nforall x (Asserted(x) -> not Yokelish(x))\n\nnot Yokelish(liana)\n\nnot Yokelish(liana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "Clemente is applied. Geof is indebted. Hanna is burning. Michelina is outlined. Kind people are not sublime. Geof is white.", "logic": "\nApplied(clemente)\nIndebted(geof)\nBurning(hanna)\nOutlined(michelina)\nforall x (Burning(x) -> not Sublime(x))\n\nWhite(geof)\n\nWhite(geof) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1633"} {"premises": "The moll secure the emily. The lynn depend the glenna. The emily is not coequal. The emily is not flexible. The emily does not like the moll. The emily suckle the glenna. The glenna suckle the emily. If someone is flexible and roumanian then they like the moll. If someone suckle the lynn then the lynn is unlocked. If someone is unlocked then they see the lynn. If someone suckle the glenna then the glenna suckle the lynn. If someone secure the moll then the moll secure the lynn. All roumanian people are unlocked. The moll secure the emily.", "logic": "\nSecure(moll, emily)\nDepend(lynn, glenna)\nnot Coequal(emily)\nnot Flexible(emily)\nnot Secure(emily, moll)\nSuckle(emily, glenna)\nSuckle(glenna, emily)\nforall x (Flexible(x) and Roumanian(x) -> Secure(x, moll))\nforall x (Suckle(x, lynn) -> Unlocked(lynn))\nforall x (Unlocked(x) -> Suckle(x, lynn))\nforall x (Suckle(x, glenna) -> Suckle(glenna, lynn))\nforall x (Secure(x, moll) -> Secure(moll, lynn))\nforall x (Roumanian(x) -> Unlocked(x))\n\nSecure(moll, emily)\n\ntherefore Secure(moll, emily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The roselyn startle the nicolea. The shanie controvert the jillane. The nicolea is not unselected. The nicolea is not semiannual. The nicolea does not like the roselyn. The nicolea occult the jillane. The jillane occult the nicolea. If someone is semiannual and reasonless then they like the roselyn. If someone occult the shanie then the shanie is cultured. If someone is cultured then they see the shanie. If someone occult the jillane then the jillane occult the shanie. If someone startle the roselyn then the roselyn startle the shanie. All reasonless people are cultured. The shanie does not need the jillane.", "logic": "\nStartle(roselyn, nicolea)\nControvert(shanie, jillane)\nnot Unselected(nicolea)\nnot Semiannual(nicolea)\nnot Startle(nicolea, roselyn)\nOccult(nicolea, jillane)\nOccult(jillane, nicolea)\nforall x (Semiannual(x) and Reasonless(x) -> Startle(x, roselyn))\nforall x (Occult(x, shanie) -> Cultured(shanie))\nforall x (Cultured(x) -> Occult(x, shanie))\nforall x (Occult(x, jillane) -> Occult(jillane, shanie))\nforall x (Startle(x, roselyn) -> Startle(roselyn, shanie))\nforall x (Reasonless(x) -> Cultured(x))\n\nnot Controvert(shanie, jillane)\n\ntherefore Controvert(shanie, jillane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The nerita plunder the viole. The anurag ammonify the ninnette. The viole is not nonviscid. The viole is not triassic. The viole does not like the nerita. The viole trellis the ninnette. The ninnette trellis the viole. If someone is triassic and canonized then they like the nerita. If someone trellis the anurag then the anurag is convivial. If someone is convivial then they see the anurag. If someone trellis the ninnette then the ninnette trellis the anurag. If someone plunder the nerita then the nerita plunder the anurag. All canonized people are convivial. The ninnette trellis the anurag.", "logic": "\nPlunder(nerita, viole)\nAmmonify(anurag, ninnette)\nnot Nonviscid(viole)\nnot Triassic(viole)\nnot Plunder(viole, nerita)\nTrellis(viole, ninnette)\nTrellis(ninnette, viole)\nforall x (Triassic(x) and Canonized(x) -> Plunder(x, nerita))\nforall x (Trellis(x, anurag) -> Convivial(anurag))\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Trellis(x, anurag))\nforall x (Trellis(x, ninnette) -> Trellis(ninnette, anurag))\nforall x (Plunder(x, nerita) -> Plunder(nerita, anurag))\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Convivial(x))\n\nTrellis(ninnette, anurag)\n\nTrellis(viole, ninnette) and forall x (Trellis(x, ninnette) -> Trellis(ninnette, anurag)) -> therefore Trellis(ninnette, anurag)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The glenda encrimson the thomas. The constanta desalinate the della. The thomas is not unwatchful. The thomas is not centric. The thomas does not like the glenda. The thomas challenge the della. The della challenge the thomas. If someone is centric and unvalued then they like the glenda. If someone challenge the constanta then the constanta is actuarial. If someone is actuarial then they see the constanta. If someone challenge the della then the della challenge the constanta. If someone encrimson the glenda then the glenda encrimson the constanta. All unvalued people are actuarial. The della does not see the constanta.", "logic": "\nEncrimson(glenda, thomas)\nDesalinate(constanta, della)\nnot Unwatchful(thomas)\nnot Centric(thomas)\nnot Encrimson(thomas, glenda)\nChallenge(thomas, della)\nChallenge(della, thomas)\nforall x (Centric(x) and Unvalued(x) -> Encrimson(x, glenda))\nforall x (Challenge(x, constanta) -> Actuarial(constanta))\nforall x (Actuarial(x) -> Challenge(x, constanta))\nforall x (Challenge(x, della) -> Challenge(della, constanta))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, glenda) -> Encrimson(glenda, constanta))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) -> Actuarial(x))\n\nnot Challenge(della, constanta)\n\nChallenge(thomas, della) and forall x (Challenge(x, della) -> Challenge(della, constanta)) -> therefore Challenge(della, constanta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The eileen fleet the manfred. The trisha filigree the meggie. The manfred is not qualified. The manfred is not bhutanese. The manfred does not like the eileen. The manfred repurchase the meggie. The meggie repurchase the manfred. If someone is bhutanese and screechy then they like the eileen. If someone repurchase the trisha then the trisha is wesleyan. If someone is wesleyan then they see the trisha. If someone repurchase the meggie then the meggie repurchase the trisha. If someone fleet the eileen then the eileen fleet the trisha. All screechy people are wesleyan. The trisha is wesleyan.", "logic": "\nFleet(eileen, manfred)\nFiligree(trisha, meggie)\nnot Qualified(manfred)\nnot Bhutanese(manfred)\nnot Fleet(manfred, eileen)\nRepurchase(manfred, meggie)\nRepurchase(meggie, manfred)\nforall x (Bhutanese(x) and Screechy(x) -> Fleet(x, eileen))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, trisha) -> Wesleyan(trisha))\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) -> Repurchase(x, trisha))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, meggie) -> Repurchase(meggie, trisha))\nforall x (Fleet(x, eileen) -> Fleet(eileen, trisha))\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Wesleyan(x))\n\nWesleyan(trisha)\n\nRepurchase(manfred, meggie) and forall x (Repurchase(x, meggie) -> Repurchase(meggie, trisha)) -> therefore Repurchase(meggie, trisha) Repurchase(meggie, trisha) and forall x (Repurchase(x, trisha) -> Wesleyan(trisha)) -> therefore Wesleyan(trisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The daphne inform the gregory. The gabrila sovietise the juliann. The gregory is not beige. The gregory is not sounding. The gregory does not like the daphne. The gregory rebuild the juliann. The juliann rebuild the gregory. If someone is sounding and backless then they like the daphne. If someone rebuild the gabrila then the gabrila is visualized. If someone is visualized then they see the gabrila. If someone rebuild the juliann then the juliann rebuild the gabrila. If someone inform the daphne then the daphne inform the gabrila. All backless people are visualized. The gabrila is not visualized.", "logic": "\nInform(daphne, gregory)\nSovietise(gabrila, juliann)\nnot Beige(gregory)\nnot Sounding(gregory)\nnot Inform(gregory, daphne)\nRebuild(gregory, juliann)\nRebuild(juliann, gregory)\nforall x (Sounding(x) and Backless(x) -> Inform(x, daphne))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, gabrila) -> Visualized(gabrila))\nforall x (Visualized(x) -> Rebuild(x, gabrila))\nforall x (Rebuild(x, juliann) -> Rebuild(juliann, gabrila))\nforall x (Inform(x, daphne) -> Inform(daphne, gabrila))\nforall x (Backless(x) -> Visualized(x))\n\nnot Visualized(gabrila)\n\nRebuild(gregory, juliann) and forall x (Rebuild(x, juliann) -> Rebuild(juliann, gabrila)) -> therefore Rebuild(juliann, gabrila) Rebuild(juliann, gabrila) and forall x (Rebuild(x, gabrila) -> Visualized(gabrila)) -> therefore Visualized(gabrila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The keelia depart the sonnie. The kitti hand the lib. The sonnie is not asphaltic. The sonnie is not anemic. The sonnie does not like the keelia. The sonnie scranch the lib. The lib scranch the sonnie. If someone is anemic and unworthy then they like the keelia. If someone scranch the kitti then the kitti is clement. If someone is clement then they see the kitti. If someone scranch the lib then the lib scranch the kitti. If someone depart the keelia then the keelia depart the kitti. All unworthy people are clement. The kitti scranch the kitti.", "logic": "\nDepart(keelia, sonnie)\nHand(kitti, lib)\nnot Asphaltic(sonnie)\nnot Anemic(sonnie)\nnot Depart(sonnie, keelia)\nScranch(sonnie, lib)\nScranch(lib, sonnie)\nforall x (Anemic(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Depart(x, keelia))\nforall x (Scranch(x, kitti) -> Clement(kitti))\nforall x (Clement(x) -> Scranch(x, kitti))\nforall x (Scranch(x, lib) -> Scranch(lib, kitti))\nforall x (Depart(x, keelia) -> Depart(keelia, kitti))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Clement(x))\n\nScranch(kitti, kitti)\n\nScranch(sonnie, lib) and forall x (Scranch(x, lib) -> Scranch(lib, kitti)) -> therefore Scranch(lib, kitti) Scranch(lib, kitti) and forall x (Scranch(x, kitti) -> Clement(kitti)) -> therefore Clement(kitti) Clement(kitti) and forall x (Clement(x) -> Scranch(x, kitti)) -> therefore Scranch(kitti, kitti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The valry federalise the worth. The donny explore the manya. The worth is not inaudible. The worth is not scrivened. The worth does not like the valry. The worth backstroke the manya. The manya backstroke the worth. If someone is scrivened and uncolored then they like the valry. If someone backstroke the donny then the donny is homemade. If someone is homemade then they see the donny. If someone backstroke the manya then the manya backstroke the donny. If someone federalise the valry then the valry federalise the donny. All uncolored people are homemade. The donny does not see the donny.", "logic": "\nFederalise(valry, worth)\nExplore(donny, manya)\nnot Inaudible(worth)\nnot Scrivened(worth)\nnot Federalise(worth, valry)\nBackstroke(worth, manya)\nBackstroke(manya, worth)\nforall x (Scrivened(x) and Uncolored(x) -> Federalise(x, valry))\nforall x (Backstroke(x, donny) -> Homemade(donny))\nforall x (Homemade(x) -> Backstroke(x, donny))\nforall x (Backstroke(x, manya) -> Backstroke(manya, donny))\nforall x (Federalise(x, valry) -> Federalise(valry, donny))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Homemade(x))\n\nnot Backstroke(donny, donny)\n\nBackstroke(worth, manya) and forall x (Backstroke(x, manya) -> Backstroke(manya, donny)) -> therefore Backstroke(manya, donny) Backstroke(manya, donny) and forall x (Backstroke(x, donny) -> Homemade(donny)) -> therefore Homemade(donny) Homemade(donny) and forall x (Homemade(x) -> Backstroke(x, donny)) -> therefore Backstroke(donny, donny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The vijay masturbate the myrtice. The geraldine fettle the calli. The myrtice is not resinous. The myrtice is not groovy. The myrtice does not like the vijay. The myrtice prospect the calli. The calli prospect the myrtice. If someone is groovy and wrought then they like the vijay. If someone prospect the geraldine then the geraldine is redemptive. If someone is redemptive then they see the geraldine. If someone prospect the calli then the calli prospect the geraldine. If someone masturbate the vijay then the vijay masturbate the geraldine. All wrought people are redemptive. The vijay does not see the geraldine.", "logic": "\nMasturbate(vijay, myrtice)\nFettle(geraldine, calli)\nnot Resinous(myrtice)\nnot Groovy(myrtice)\nnot Masturbate(myrtice, vijay)\nProspect(myrtice, calli)\nProspect(calli, myrtice)\nforall x (Groovy(x) and Wrought(x) -> Masturbate(x, vijay))\nforall x (Prospect(x, geraldine) -> Redemptive(geraldine))\nforall x (Redemptive(x) -> Prospect(x, geraldine))\nforall x (Prospect(x, calli) -> Prospect(calli, geraldine))\nforall x (Masturbate(x, vijay) -> Masturbate(vijay, geraldine))\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> Redemptive(x))\n\nnot Prospect(vijay, geraldine)\n\nforall x (Redemptive(x) -> Prospect(x, geraldine)) <- forall x (Wrought(x) -> Redemptive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The emma grant the rosana. The gilli recognise the janos. The rosana is not ironlike. The rosana is not numerical. The rosana does not like the emma. The rosana embank the janos. The janos embank the rosana. If someone is numerical and cuboidal then they like the emma. If someone embank the gilli then the gilli is laudable. If someone is laudable then they see the gilli. If someone embank the janos then the janos embank the gilli. If someone grant the emma then the emma grant the gilli. All cuboidal people are laudable. The janos is laudable.", "logic": "\nGrant(emma, rosana)\nRecognise(gilli, janos)\nnot Ironlike(rosana)\nnot Numerical(rosana)\nnot Grant(rosana, emma)\nEmbank(rosana, janos)\nEmbank(janos, rosana)\nforall x (Numerical(x) and Cuboidal(x) -> Grant(x, emma))\nforall x (Embank(x, gilli) -> Laudable(gilli))\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Embank(x, gilli))\nforall x (Embank(x, janos) -> Embank(janos, gilli))\nforall x (Grant(x, emma) -> Grant(emma, gilli))\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) -> Laudable(x))\n\nLaudable(janos)\n\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) -> Laudable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The carlin declare the davidde. The katleen sharpen the kevina. The davidde is not disyllabic. The davidde is not sweptback. The davidde does not like the carlin. The davidde declutch the kevina. The kevina declutch the davidde. If someone is sweptback and meek then they like the carlin. If someone declutch the katleen then the katleen is zodiacal. If someone is zodiacal then they see the katleen. If someone declutch the kevina then the kevina declutch the katleen. If someone declare the carlin then the carlin declare the katleen. All meek people are zodiacal. The carlin does not like the carlin.", "logic": "\nDeclare(carlin, davidde)\nSharpen(katleen, kevina)\nnot Disyllabic(davidde)\nnot Sweptback(davidde)\nnot Declare(davidde, carlin)\nDeclutch(davidde, kevina)\nDeclutch(kevina, davidde)\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and Meek(x) -> Declare(x, carlin))\nforall x (Declutch(x, katleen) -> Zodiacal(katleen))\nforall x (Zodiacal(x) -> Declutch(x, katleen))\nforall x (Declutch(x, kevina) -> Declutch(kevina, katleen))\nforall x (Declare(x, carlin) -> Declare(carlin, katleen))\nforall x (Meek(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\n\nnot Declare(carlin, carlin)\n\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and Meek(x) -> Declare(x, carlin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The eva unnerve the sauncho. The kenn engorge the bonita. The sauncho is not squally. The sauncho is not unsinkable. The sauncho does not like the eva. The sauncho dally the bonita. The bonita dally the sauncho. If someone is unsinkable and lamenting then they like the eva. If someone dally the kenn then the kenn is smothered. If someone is smothered then they see the kenn. If someone dally the bonita then the bonita dally the kenn. If someone unnerve the eva then the eva unnerve the kenn. All lamenting people are smothered. The eva unnerve the kenn.", "logic": "\nUnnerve(eva, sauncho)\nEngorge(kenn, bonita)\nnot Squally(sauncho)\nnot Unsinkable(sauncho)\nnot Unnerve(sauncho, eva)\nDally(sauncho, bonita)\nDally(bonita, sauncho)\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) and Lamenting(x) -> Unnerve(x, eva))\nforall x (Dally(x, kenn) -> Smothered(kenn))\nforall x (Smothered(x) -> Dally(x, kenn))\nforall x (Dally(x, bonita) -> Dally(bonita, kenn))\nforall x (Unnerve(x, eva) -> Unnerve(eva, kenn))\nforall x (Lamenting(x) -> Smothered(x))\n\nUnnerve(eva, kenn)\n\nforall x (Unnerve(x, eva) -> Unnerve(eva, kenn)) <- forall x (Unsinkable(x) and Lamenting(x) -> Unnerve(x, eva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The bobby intrench the corrie. The ertha overstep the inga. The corrie is not forgetful. The corrie is not chthonic. The corrie does not like the bobby. The corrie marinate the inga. The inga marinate the corrie. If someone is chthonic and fringy then they like the bobby. If someone marinate the ertha then the ertha is diaphyseal. If someone is diaphyseal then they see the ertha. If someone marinate the inga then the inga marinate the ertha. If someone intrench the bobby then the bobby intrench the ertha. All fringy people are diaphyseal. The corrie does not like the ertha.", "logic": "\nIntrench(bobby, corrie)\nOverstep(ertha, inga)\nnot Forgetful(corrie)\nnot Chthonic(corrie)\nnot Intrench(corrie, bobby)\nMarinate(corrie, inga)\nMarinate(inga, corrie)\nforall x (Chthonic(x) and Fringy(x) -> Intrench(x, bobby))\nforall x (Marinate(x, ertha) -> Diaphyseal(ertha))\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) -> Marinate(x, ertha))\nforall x (Marinate(x, inga) -> Marinate(inga, ertha))\nforall x (Intrench(x, bobby) -> Intrench(bobby, ertha))\nforall x (Fringy(x) -> Diaphyseal(x))\n\nnot Intrench(corrie, ertha)\n\nnot Intrench(corrie, ertha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The elisa scrape the abagail. The niels dateline the nahum. The abagail is not draconian. The abagail is not unseeyn. The abagail does not like the elisa. The abagail cart the nahum. The nahum cart the abagail. If someone is unseeyn and slumbery then they like the elisa. If someone cart the niels then the niels is smutty. If someone is smutty then they see the niels. If someone cart the nahum then the nahum cart the niels. If someone scrape the elisa then the elisa scrape the niels. All slumbery people are smutty. The nahum is blue.", "logic": "\nScrape(elisa, abagail)\nDateline(niels, nahum)\nnot Draconian(abagail)\nnot Unseeyn(abagail)\nnot Scrape(abagail, elisa)\nCart(abagail, nahum)\nCart(nahum, abagail)\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) and Slumbery(x) -> Scrape(x, elisa))\nforall x (Cart(x, niels) -> Smutty(niels))\nforall x (Smutty(x) -> Cart(x, niels))\nforall x (Cart(x, nahum) -> Cart(nahum, niels))\nforall x (Scrape(x, elisa) -> Scrape(elisa, niels))\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Smutty(x))\n\nBlue(nahum)\n\nBlue(nahum) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The melvyn militarise the jacki. The halette flush the dolores. The jacki is not straining. The jacki is not castrated. The jacki does not like the melvyn. The jacki disgorge the dolores. The dolores disgorge the jacki. If someone is castrated and bhutanese then they like the melvyn. If someone disgorge the halette then the halette is misguided. If someone is misguided then they see the halette. If someone disgorge the dolores then the dolores disgorge the halette. If someone militarise the melvyn then the melvyn militarise the halette. All bhutanese people are misguided. The melvyn is not castrated.", "logic": "\nMilitarise(melvyn, jacki)\nFlush(halette, dolores)\nnot Straining(jacki)\nnot Castrated(jacki)\nnot Militarise(jacki, melvyn)\nDisgorge(jacki, dolores)\nDisgorge(dolores, jacki)\nforall x (Castrated(x) and Bhutanese(x) -> Militarise(x, melvyn))\nforall x (Disgorge(x, halette) -> Misguided(halette))\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Disgorge(x, halette))\nforall x (Disgorge(x, dolores) -> Disgorge(dolores, halette))\nforall x (Militarise(x, melvyn) -> Militarise(melvyn, halette))\nforall x (Bhutanese(x) -> Misguided(x))\n\nnot Castrated(melvyn)\n\nnot Castrated(melvyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The abelard undervalue the wrennie. The austin incite the minni. The wrennie is not cliched. The wrennie is not bedrid. The wrennie does not like the abelard. The wrennie snag the minni. The minni snag the wrennie. If someone is bedrid and spiked then they like the abelard. If someone snag the austin then the austin is ternary. If someone is ternary then they see the austin. If someone snag the minni then the minni snag the austin. If someone undervalue the abelard then the abelard undervalue the austin. All spiked people are ternary. The austin undervalue the austin.", "logic": "\nUndervalue(abelard, wrennie)\nIncite(austin, minni)\nnot Cliched(wrennie)\nnot Bedrid(wrennie)\nnot Undervalue(wrennie, abelard)\nSnag(wrennie, minni)\nSnag(minni, wrennie)\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and Spiked(x) -> Undervalue(x, abelard))\nforall x (Snag(x, austin) -> Ternary(austin))\nforall x (Ternary(x) -> Snag(x, austin))\nforall x (Snag(x, minni) -> Snag(minni, austin))\nforall x (Undervalue(x, abelard) -> Undervalue(abelard, austin))\nforall x (Spiked(x) -> Ternary(x))\n\nUndervalue(austin, austin)\n\nUndervalue(austin, austin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-489"} {"premises": "The curtice tamp the davita. The curtice is ineffable. The curtice is cute. The noreen puke the davita. The anallese is cute. The anallese puke the curtice. The davita puke the noreen. If someone puke the noreen then the noreen puke the curtice. If someone puke the curtice then they eat the anallese. The noreen puke the davita.", "logic": "\nTamp(curtice, davita)\nIneffable(curtice)\nCute(curtice)\nPuke(noreen, davita)\nCute(anallese)\nPuke(anallese, curtice)\nPuke(davita, noreen)\nforall x (Puke(x, noreen) -> Puke(noreen, curtice))\nforall x (Puke(x, curtice) -> Tamp(x, anallese))\n\nPuke(noreen, davita)\n\ntherefore Puke(noreen, davita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The angelico dally the livia. The angelico is cankerous. The angelico is cloudlike. The barb reap the livia. The raine is cloudlike. The raine reap the angelico. The livia reap the barb. If someone reap the barb then the barb reap the angelico. If someone reap the angelico then they eat the raine. The barb does not see the livia.", "logic": "\nDally(angelico, livia)\nCankerous(angelico)\nCloudlike(angelico)\nReap(barb, livia)\nCloudlike(raine)\nReap(raine, angelico)\nReap(livia, barb)\nforall x (Reap(x, barb) -> Reap(barb, angelico))\nforall x (Reap(x, angelico) -> Dally(x, raine))\n\nnot Reap(barb, livia)\n\ntherefore Reap(barb, livia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The aube scold the clarey. The aube is organic. The aube is sinkable. The jennings flock the clarey. The ferguson is sinkable. The ferguson flock the aube. The clarey flock the jennings. If someone flock the jennings then the jennings flock the aube. If someone flock the aube then they eat the ferguson. The ferguson scold the ferguson.", "logic": "\nScold(aube, clarey)\nOrganic(aube)\nSinkable(aube)\nFlock(jennings, clarey)\nSinkable(ferguson)\nFlock(ferguson, aube)\nFlock(clarey, jennings)\nforall x (Flock(x, jennings) -> Flock(jennings, aube))\nforall x (Flock(x, aube) -> Scold(x, ferguson))\n\nScold(ferguson, ferguson)\n\nFlock(ferguson, aube) and forall x (Flock(x, aube) -> Scold(x, ferguson)) -> therefore Scold(ferguson, ferguson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The martin surface the townie. The martin is washed. The martin is singhalese. The teddie labialize the townie. The park is singhalese. The park labialize the martin. The townie labialize the teddie. If someone labialize the teddie then the teddie labialize the martin. If someone labialize the martin then they eat the park. The park does not eat the park.", "logic": "\nSurface(martin, townie)\nWashed(martin)\nSinghalese(martin)\nLabialize(teddie, townie)\nSinghalese(park)\nLabialize(park, martin)\nLabialize(townie, teddie)\nforall x (Labialize(x, teddie) -> Labialize(teddie, martin))\nforall x (Labialize(x, martin) -> Surface(x, park))\n\nnot Surface(park, park)\n\nLabialize(park, martin) and forall x (Labialize(x, martin) -> Surface(x, park)) -> therefore Surface(park, park)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The delmar luxate the kennedy. The delmar is drugless. The delmar is profane. The ceil grudge the kennedy. The birgitta is profane. The birgitta grudge the delmar. The kennedy grudge the ceil. If someone grudge the ceil then the ceil grudge the delmar. If someone grudge the delmar then they eat the birgitta. The ceil luxate the birgitta.", "logic": "\nLuxate(delmar, kennedy)\nDrugless(delmar)\nProfane(delmar)\nGrudge(ceil, kennedy)\nProfane(birgitta)\nGrudge(birgitta, delmar)\nGrudge(kennedy, ceil)\nforall x (Grudge(x, ceil) -> Grudge(ceil, delmar))\nforall x (Grudge(x, delmar) -> Luxate(x, birgitta))\n\nLuxate(ceil, birgitta)\n\nGrudge(kennedy, ceil) and forall x (Grudge(x, ceil) -> Grudge(ceil, delmar)) -> therefore Grudge(ceil, delmar) Grudge(ceil, delmar) and forall x (Grudge(x, delmar) -> Luxate(x, birgitta)) -> therefore Luxate(ceil, birgitta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The liliane waste the cathryn. The liliane is weird. The liliane is xxiii. The sianna braille the cathryn. The marja is xxiii. The marja braille the liliane. The cathryn braille the sianna. If someone braille the sianna then the sianna braille the liliane. If someone braille the liliane then they eat the marja. The sianna does not eat the marja.", "logic": "\nWaste(liliane, cathryn)\nWeird(liliane)\nXxiii(liliane)\nBraille(sianna, cathryn)\nXxiii(marja)\nBraille(marja, liliane)\nBraille(cathryn, sianna)\nforall x (Braille(x, sianna) -> Braille(sianna, liliane))\nforall x (Braille(x, liliane) -> Waste(x, marja))\n\nnot Waste(sianna, marja)\n\nBraille(cathryn, sianna) and forall x (Braille(x, sianna) -> Braille(sianna, liliane)) -> therefore Braille(sianna, liliane) Braille(sianna, liliane) and forall x (Braille(x, liliane) -> Waste(x, marja)) -> therefore Waste(sianna, marja)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The terrel mist the holly. The terrel is perceived. The terrel is amnesiac. The wilburn comport the holly. The colline is amnesiac. The colline comport the terrel. The holly comport the wilburn. If someone comport the wilburn then the wilburn comport the terrel. If someone comport the terrel then they eat the colline. The terrel does not eat the colline.", "logic": "\nMist(terrel, holly)\nPerceived(terrel)\nAmnesiac(terrel)\nComport(wilburn, holly)\nAmnesiac(colline)\nComport(colline, terrel)\nComport(holly, wilburn)\nforall x (Comport(x, wilburn) -> Comport(wilburn, terrel))\nforall x (Comport(x, terrel) -> Mist(x, colline))\n\nnot Mist(terrel, colline)\n\nforall x (Comport(x, terrel) -> Mist(x, colline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The bobbette splinter the stephana. The bobbette is monoicous. The bobbette is migrant. The pammie basset the stephana. The brad is migrant. The brad basset the bobbette. The stephana basset the pammie. If someone basset the pammie then the pammie basset the bobbette. If someone basset the bobbette then they eat the brad. The stephana splinter the brad.", "logic": "\nSplinter(bobbette, stephana)\nMonoicous(bobbette)\nMigrant(bobbette)\nBasset(pammie, stephana)\nMigrant(brad)\nBasset(brad, bobbette)\nBasset(stephana, pammie)\nforall x (Basset(x, pammie) -> Basset(pammie, bobbette))\nforall x (Basset(x, bobbette) -> Splinter(x, brad))\n\nSplinter(stephana, brad)\n\nforall x (Basset(x, bobbette) -> Splinter(x, brad)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The agamemnon lade the pincus. The agamemnon is tacit. The agamemnon is cautious. The agretha defeminize the pincus. The calla is cautious. The calla defeminize the agamemnon. The pincus defeminize the agretha. If someone defeminize the agretha then the agretha defeminize the agamemnon. If someone defeminize the agamemnon then they eat the calla. The agretha does not see the agretha.", "logic": "\nLade(agamemnon, pincus)\nTacit(agamemnon)\nCautious(agamemnon)\nDefeminize(agretha, pincus)\nCautious(calla)\nDefeminize(calla, agamemnon)\nDefeminize(pincus, agretha)\nforall x (Defeminize(x, agretha) -> Defeminize(agretha, agamemnon))\nforall x (Defeminize(x, agamemnon) -> Lade(x, calla))\n\nnot Defeminize(agretha, agretha)\n\nnot Defeminize(agretha, agretha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The hagan monish the cyril. The hagan is ghanaian. The hagan is bewitching. The yancy embalm the cyril. The sherry is bewitching. The sherry embalm the hagan. The cyril embalm the yancy. If someone embalm the yancy then the yancy embalm the hagan. If someone embalm the hagan then they eat the sherry. The hagan is young.", "logic": "\nMonish(hagan, cyril)\nGhanaian(hagan)\nBewitching(hagan)\nEmbalm(yancy, cyril)\nBewitching(sherry)\nEmbalm(sherry, hagan)\nEmbalm(cyril, yancy)\nforall x (Embalm(x, yancy) -> Embalm(yancy, hagan))\nforall x (Embalm(x, hagan) -> Monish(x, sherry))\n\nYoung(hagan)\n\nYoung(hagan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The laurie oxygenise the dario. The laurie is continual. The laurie is idiotic. The doug shred the dario. The odell is idiotic. The odell shred the laurie. The dario shred the doug. If someone shred the doug then the doug shred the laurie. If someone shred the laurie then they eat the odell. The laurie does not see the odell.", "logic": "\nOxygenise(laurie, dario)\nContinual(laurie)\nIdiotic(laurie)\nShred(doug, dario)\nIdiotic(odell)\nShred(odell, laurie)\nShred(dario, doug)\nforall x (Shred(x, doug) -> Shred(doug, laurie))\nforall x (Shred(x, laurie) -> Oxygenise(x, odell))\n\nnot Shred(laurie, odell)\n\nnot Shred(laurie, odell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "The philly forget the faydra. The philly is burnt. The philly is capped. The helga canker the faydra. The corly is capped. The corly canker the philly. The faydra canker the helga. If someone canker the helga then the helga canker the philly. If someone canker the philly then they eat the corly. The philly forget the helga.", "logic": "\nForget(philly, faydra)\nBurnt(philly)\nCapped(philly)\nCanker(helga, faydra)\nCapped(corly)\nCanker(corly, philly)\nCanker(faydra, helga)\nforall x (Canker(x, helga) -> Canker(helga, philly))\nforall x (Canker(x, philly) -> Forget(x, corly))\n\nForget(philly, helga)\n\nForget(philly, helga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2088"} {"premises": "Andreana is dysphoric. Andreana is metallike. Andreana is involved. Andreana is not insightful. Andreana is not resounding. Andreana is model. Andreana is earthen. If someone is dysphoric and resounding then they are not model. Kind, involved people are metallike. If Andreana is involved and Andreana is dysphoric then Andreana is model. If someone is involved and insightful then they are earthen. If Andreana is resounding and Andreana is metallike then Andreana is involved. If Andreana is metallike then Andreana is not resounding. Andreana is model.", "logic": "\nDysphoric(andreana)\nMetallike(andreana)\nInvolved(andreana)\nnot Insightful(andreana)\nnot Resounding(andreana)\nModel(andreana)\nEarthen(andreana)\nforall x (Dysphoric(x) and Resounding(x) -> not Model(x))\nforall x (Insightful(x) and Involved(x) -> Metallike(x))\nInvolved(andreana) and Dysphoric(andreana) -> Model(andreana)\nforall x (Involved(x) and Insightful(x) -> Earthen(x))\nResounding(andreana) and Metallike(andreana) -> Involved(andreana)\nMetallike(andreana) -> not Resounding(andreana)\n\nModel(andreana)\n\ntherefore Model(andreana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6560"} {"premises": "Eileen is agelong. Eileen is unhampered. Eileen is faded. Eileen is not pharisaic. Eileen is not tittering. Eileen is grimy. Eileen is pukka. If someone is agelong and tittering then they are not grimy. Kind, faded people are unhampered. If Eileen is faded and Eileen is agelong then Eileen is grimy. If someone is faded and pharisaic then they are pukka. If Eileen is tittering and Eileen is unhampered then Eileen is faded. If Eileen is unhampered then Eileen is not tittering. Eileen is pharisaic.", "logic": "\nAgelong(eileen)\nUnhampered(eileen)\nFaded(eileen)\nnot Pharisaic(eileen)\nnot Tittering(eileen)\nGrimy(eileen)\nPukka(eileen)\nforall x (Agelong(x) and Tittering(x) -> not Grimy(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) and Faded(x) -> Unhampered(x))\nFaded(eileen) and Agelong(eileen) -> Grimy(eileen)\nforall x (Faded(x) and Pharisaic(x) -> Pukka(x))\nTittering(eileen) and Unhampered(eileen) -> Faded(eileen)\nUnhampered(eileen) -> not Tittering(eileen)\n\nPharisaic(eileen)\n\ntherefore not Pharisaic(eileen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6560"} {"premises": "Cassandry is virginal. Rog is enfeebling. Christina is mutational. Colleen is virginal. Cold, virginal people are not trackless. Green, mutational people are trackless. Round people are trackless. If Rog is metastatic and Rog is enfeebling then Rog is not virginal. All virginal people are mutational. If someone is virginal and mutational then they are enfeebling. If someone is cockney and not furthest then they are not virginal. If Rog is not virginal then Rog is not trackless. Colleen is virginal.", "logic": "\nVirginal(cassandry)\nEnfeebling(rog)\nMutational(christina)\nVirginal(colleen)\nforall x (Cockney(x) and Virginal(x) -> not Trackless(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and Mutational(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) -> Trackless(x))\nMetastatic(rog) and Enfeebling(rog) -> not Virginal(rog)\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Mutational(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) and Mutational(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Cockney(x) and not Furthest(x) -> not Virginal(x))\nnot Virginal(rog) -> not Trackless(rog)\n\nVirginal(colleen)\n\ntherefore Virginal(colleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Berty is underslung. Odessa is bothersome. Adara is derisive. Norman is underslung. Cold, underslung people are not dismissive. Green, derisive people are dismissive. Round people are dismissive. If Odessa is singing and Odessa is bothersome then Odessa is not underslung. All underslung people are derisive. If someone is underslung and derisive then they are bothersome. If someone is ajar and not linked then they are not underslung. If Odessa is not underslung then Odessa is not dismissive. Adara is not derisive.", "logic": "\nUnderslung(berty)\nBothersome(odessa)\nDerisive(adara)\nUnderslung(norman)\nforall x (Ajar(x) and Underslung(x) -> not Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Linked(x) and Derisive(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nSinging(odessa) and Bothersome(odessa) -> not Underslung(odessa)\nforall x (Underslung(x) -> Derisive(x))\nforall x (Underslung(x) and Derisive(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nforall x (Ajar(x) and not Linked(x) -> not Underslung(x))\nnot Underslung(odessa) -> not Dismissive(odessa)\n\nnot Derisive(adara)\n\ntherefore Derisive(adara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Rosmunda is freckled. Zollie is opportune. Ardis is indictable. Deloris is freckled. Cold, freckled people are not aging. Green, indictable people are aging. Round people are aging. If Zollie is fortuitous and Zollie is opportune then Zollie is not freckled. All freckled people are indictable. If someone is freckled and indictable then they are opportune. If someone is shintoist and not unfocussed then they are not freckled. If Zollie is not freckled then Zollie is not aging. Zollie is aging.", "logic": "\nFreckled(rosmunda)\nOpportune(zollie)\nIndictable(ardis)\nFreckled(deloris)\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and Freckled(x) -> not Aging(x))\nforall x (Unfocussed(x) and Indictable(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Opportune(x) -> Aging(x))\nFortuitous(zollie) and Opportune(zollie) -> not Freckled(zollie)\nforall x (Freckled(x) -> Indictable(x))\nforall x (Freckled(x) and Indictable(x) -> Opportune(x))\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and not Unfocussed(x) -> not Freckled(x))\nnot Freckled(zollie) -> not Aging(zollie)\n\nAging(zollie)\n\nOpportune(zollie) and forall x (Opportune(x) -> Aging(x)) -> therefore Aging(zollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Fayth is polyvalent. Laurence is both. Elysia is bedewed. Socrates is polyvalent. Cold, polyvalent people are not insatiable. Green, bedewed people are insatiable. Round people are insatiable. If Laurence is false and Laurence is both then Laurence is not polyvalent. All polyvalent people are bedewed. If someone is polyvalent and bedewed then they are both. If someone is lxxxii and not gleaming then they are not polyvalent. If Laurence is not polyvalent then Laurence is not insatiable. Socrates is not bedewed.", "logic": "\nPolyvalent(fayth)\nBoth(laurence)\nBedewed(elysia)\nPolyvalent(socrates)\nforall x (Lxxxii(x) and Polyvalent(x) -> not Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Bedewed(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Both(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nFalse(laurence) and Both(laurence) -> not Polyvalent(laurence)\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) and Bedewed(x) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Lxxxii(x) and not Gleaming(x) -> not Polyvalent(x))\nnot Polyvalent(laurence) -> not Insatiable(laurence)\n\nnot Bedewed(socrates)\n\nPolyvalent(socrates) and forall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Bedewed(x)) -> therefore Bedewed(socrates)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Dudley is conducive. Inna is fruticose. Rayner is autoecious. Terza is conducive. Cold, conducive people are not soused. Green, autoecious people are soused. Round people are soused. If Inna is aroused and Inna is fruticose then Inna is not conducive. All conducive people are autoecious. If someone is conducive and autoecious then they are fruticose. If someone is foregoing and not smoothbore then they are not conducive. If Inna is not conducive then Inna is not soused. Dudley is fruticose.", "logic": "\nConducive(dudley)\nFruticose(inna)\nAutoecious(rayner)\nConducive(terza)\nforall x (Foregoing(x) and Conducive(x) -> not Soused(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Fruticose(x) -> Soused(x))\nAroused(inna) and Fruticose(inna) -> not Conducive(inna)\nforall x (Conducive(x) -> Autoecious(x))\nforall x (Conducive(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Fruticose(x))\nforall x (Foregoing(x) and not Smoothbore(x) -> not Conducive(x))\nnot Conducive(inna) -> not Soused(inna)\n\nFruticose(dudley)\n\nConducive(dudley) and forall x (Conducive(x) -> Autoecious(x)) -> therefore Autoecious(dudley) Conducive(dudley) and Autoecious(dudley) and forall x (Conducive(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Fruticose(x)) -> therefore Fruticose(dudley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Zola is dutiable. Allan is healed. Cyrillus is jainist. Dela is dutiable. Cold, dutiable people are not public. Green, jainist people are public. Round people are public. If Allan is lessened and Allan is healed then Allan is not dutiable. All dutiable people are jainist. If someone is dutiable and jainist then they are healed. If someone is poached and not astragalar then they are not dutiable. If Allan is not dutiable then Allan is not public. Zola is not healed.", "logic": "\nDutiable(zola)\nHealed(allan)\nJainist(cyrillus)\nDutiable(dela)\nforall x (Poached(x) and Dutiable(x) -> not Public(x))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) and Jainist(x) -> Public(x))\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Public(x))\nLessened(allan) and Healed(allan) -> not Dutiable(allan)\nforall x (Dutiable(x) -> Jainist(x))\nforall x (Dutiable(x) and Jainist(x) -> Healed(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) and not Astragalar(x) -> not Dutiable(x))\nnot Dutiable(allan) -> not Public(allan)\n\nnot Healed(zola)\n\nDutiable(zola) and forall x (Dutiable(x) -> Jainist(x)) -> therefore Jainist(zola) Dutiable(zola) and Jainist(zola) and forall x (Dutiable(x) and Jainist(x) -> Healed(x)) -> therefore Healed(zola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Dyane is coseismal. Suzzy is monoclonal. Wright is mirky. Shannah is coseismal. Cold, coseismal people are not misbegot. Green, mirky people are misbegot. Round people are misbegot. If Suzzy is plural and Suzzy is monoclonal then Suzzy is not coseismal. All coseismal people are mirky. If someone is coseismal and mirky then they are monoclonal. If someone is isomorphic and not cockamamy then they are not coseismal. If Suzzy is not coseismal then Suzzy is not misbegot. Dyane is misbegot.", "logic": "\nCoseismal(dyane)\nMonoclonal(suzzy)\nMirky(wright)\nCoseismal(shannah)\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) and Coseismal(x) -> not Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Cockamamy(x) and Mirky(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nPlural(suzzy) and Monoclonal(suzzy) -> not Coseismal(suzzy)\nforall x (Coseismal(x) -> Mirky(x))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) and Mirky(x) -> Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) and not Cockamamy(x) -> not Coseismal(x))\nnot Coseismal(suzzy) -> not Misbegot(suzzy)\n\nMisbegot(dyane)\n\nCoseismal(dyane) and forall x (Coseismal(x) -> Mirky(x)) -> therefore Mirky(dyane) Coseismal(dyane) and Mirky(dyane) and forall x (Coseismal(x) and Mirky(x) -> Monoclonal(x)) -> therefore Monoclonal(dyane) Monoclonal(dyane) and forall x (Monoclonal(x) -> Misbegot(x)) -> therefore Misbegot(dyane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Rey is eldritch. Nahum is barbaric. Honor is dried. Caitlin is eldritch. Cold, eldritch people are not uncarved. Green, dried people are uncarved. Round people are uncarved. If Nahum is aural and Nahum is barbaric then Nahum is not eldritch. All eldritch people are dried. If someone is eldritch and dried then they are barbaric. If someone is pedantic and not blameful then they are not eldritch. If Nahum is not eldritch then Nahum is not uncarved. Rey is not uncarved.", "logic": "\nEldritch(rey)\nBarbaric(nahum)\nDried(honor)\nEldritch(caitlin)\nforall x (Pedantic(x) and Eldritch(x) -> not Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Blameful(x) and Dried(x) -> Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Barbaric(x) -> Uncarved(x))\nAural(nahum) and Barbaric(nahum) -> not Eldritch(nahum)\nforall x (Eldritch(x) -> Dried(x))\nforall x (Eldritch(x) and Dried(x) -> Barbaric(x))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) and not Blameful(x) -> not Eldritch(x))\nnot Eldritch(nahum) -> not Uncarved(nahum)\n\nnot Uncarved(rey)\n\nEldritch(rey) and forall x (Eldritch(x) -> Dried(x)) -> therefore Dried(rey) Eldritch(rey) and Dried(rey) and forall x (Eldritch(x) and Dried(x) -> Barbaric(x)) -> therefore Barbaric(rey) Barbaric(rey) and forall x (Barbaric(x) -> Uncarved(x)) -> therefore Uncarved(rey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Rosaline is gobsmacked. Jannelle is sketchy. Derick is frail. Celia is gobsmacked. Cold, gobsmacked people are not cerise. Green, frail people are cerise. Round people are cerise. If Jannelle is appositive and Jannelle is sketchy then Jannelle is not gobsmacked. All gobsmacked people are frail. If someone is gobsmacked and frail then they are sketchy. If someone is sorted and not huddled then they are not gobsmacked. If Jannelle is not gobsmacked then Jannelle is not cerise. Derick is not cerise.", "logic": "\nGobsmacked(rosaline)\nSketchy(jannelle)\nFrail(derick)\nGobsmacked(celia)\nforall x (Sorted(x) and Gobsmacked(x) -> not Cerise(x))\nforall x (Huddled(x) and Frail(x) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Sketchy(x) -> Cerise(x))\nAppositive(jannelle) and Sketchy(jannelle) -> not Gobsmacked(jannelle)\nforall x (Gobsmacked(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Gobsmacked(x) and Frail(x) -> Sketchy(x))\nforall x (Sorted(x) and not Huddled(x) -> not Gobsmacked(x))\nnot Gobsmacked(jannelle) -> not Cerise(jannelle)\n\nnot Cerise(derick)\n\nforall x (Sketchy(x) -> Cerise(x)) <- forall x (Gobsmacked(x) and Frail(x) -> Sketchy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Rollo is incorrupt. Emil is maroon. Husein is heard. Catie is incorrupt. Cold, incorrupt people are not discrete. Green, heard people are discrete. Round people are discrete. If Emil is phobic and Emil is maroon then Emil is not incorrupt. All incorrupt people are heard. If someone is incorrupt and heard then they are maroon. If someone is antiseptic and not diffusing then they are not incorrupt. If Emil is not incorrupt then Emil is not discrete. Emil is heard.", "logic": "\nIncorrupt(rollo)\nMaroon(emil)\nHeard(husein)\nIncorrupt(catie)\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) and Incorrupt(x) -> not Discrete(x))\nforall x (Diffusing(x) and Heard(x) -> Discrete(x))\nforall x (Maroon(x) -> Discrete(x))\nPhobic(emil) and Maroon(emil) -> not Incorrupt(emil)\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Heard(x))\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) and Heard(x) -> Maroon(x))\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) and not Diffusing(x) -> not Incorrupt(x))\nnot Incorrupt(emil) -> not Discrete(emil)\n\nHeard(emil)\n\nforall x (Incorrupt(x) -> Heard(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Hillary is forthright. Mitra is heroic. Lucille is axiomatic. Dulce is forthright. Cold, forthright people are not accented. Green, axiomatic people are accented. Round people are accented. If Mitra is creditable and Mitra is heroic then Mitra is not forthright. All forthright people are axiomatic. If someone is forthright and axiomatic then they are heroic. If someone is spick and not nonracial then they are not forthright. If Mitra is not forthright then Mitra is not accented. Lucille is not heroic.", "logic": "\nForthright(hillary)\nHeroic(mitra)\nAxiomatic(lucille)\nForthright(dulce)\nforall x (Spick(x) and Forthright(x) -> not Accented(x))\nforall x (Nonracial(x) and Axiomatic(x) -> Accented(x))\nforall x (Heroic(x) -> Accented(x))\nCreditable(mitra) and Heroic(mitra) -> not Forthright(mitra)\nforall x (Forthright(x) -> Axiomatic(x))\nforall x (Forthright(x) and Axiomatic(x) -> Heroic(x))\nforall x (Spick(x) and not Nonracial(x) -> not Forthright(x))\nnot Forthright(mitra) -> not Accented(mitra)\n\nnot Heroic(lucille)\n\nforall x (Forthright(x) and Axiomatic(x) -> Heroic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Helmuth is beaming. Lynne is scarred. Janka is cloven. Rodie is beaming. Cold, beaming people are not malformed. Green, cloven people are malformed. Round people are malformed. If Lynne is revokable and Lynne is scarred then Lynne is not beaming. All beaming people are cloven. If someone is beaming and cloven then they are scarred. If someone is fleshy and not gleaming then they are not beaming. If Lynne is not beaming then Lynne is not malformed. Helmuth is fleshy.", "logic": "\nBeaming(helmuth)\nScarred(lynne)\nCloven(janka)\nBeaming(rodie)\nforall x (Fleshy(x) and Beaming(x) -> not Malformed(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Cloven(x) -> Malformed(x))\nforall x (Scarred(x) -> Malformed(x))\nRevokable(lynne) and Scarred(lynne) -> not Beaming(lynne)\nforall x (Beaming(x) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Beaming(x) and Cloven(x) -> Scarred(x))\nforall x (Fleshy(x) and not Gleaming(x) -> not Beaming(x))\nnot Beaming(lynne) -> not Malformed(lynne)\n\nFleshy(helmuth)\n\nFleshy(helmuth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Eustacia is unleaded. Cicily is synonymous. Melissa is daedal. Isabel is unleaded. Cold, unleaded people are not saddled. Green, daedal people are saddled. Round people are saddled. If Cicily is veteran and Cicily is synonymous then Cicily is not unleaded. All unleaded people are daedal. If someone is unleaded and daedal then they are synonymous. If someone is reflecting and not bisontine then they are not unleaded. If Cicily is not unleaded then Cicily is not saddled. Isabel is not bisontine.", "logic": "\nUnleaded(eustacia)\nSynonymous(cicily)\nDaedal(melissa)\nUnleaded(isabel)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Unleaded(x) -> not Saddled(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) and Daedal(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) -> Saddled(x))\nVeteran(cicily) and Synonymous(cicily) -> not Unleaded(cicily)\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Unleaded(x) and Daedal(x) -> Synonymous(x))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and not Bisontine(x) -> not Unleaded(x))\nnot Unleaded(cicily) -> not Saddled(cicily)\n\nnot Bisontine(isabel)\n\nnot Bisontine(isabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Margaux is orbiculate. Jessy is sanative. Lauretta is submissive. Elmore is orbiculate. Cold, orbiculate people are not informed. Green, submissive people are informed. Round people are informed. If Jessy is ringlike and Jessy is sanative then Jessy is not orbiculate. All orbiculate people are submissive. If someone is orbiculate and submissive then they are sanative. If someone is asphaltic and not triplex then they are not orbiculate. If Jessy is not orbiculate then Jessy is not informed. Margaux is ringlike.", "logic": "\nOrbiculate(margaux)\nSanative(jessy)\nSubmissive(lauretta)\nOrbiculate(elmore)\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and Orbiculate(x) -> not Informed(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) and Submissive(x) -> Informed(x))\nforall x (Sanative(x) -> Informed(x))\nRinglike(jessy) and Sanative(jessy) -> not Orbiculate(jessy)\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) and Submissive(x) -> Sanative(x))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and not Triplex(x) -> not Orbiculate(x))\nnot Orbiculate(jessy) -> not Informed(jessy)\n\nRinglike(margaux)\n\nRinglike(margaux) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Carmelina is calando. Latashia is catabolic. Anissa is synthetic. Lorne is calando. Cold, calando people are not slimy. Green, synthetic people are slimy. Round people are slimy. If Latashia is headed and Latashia is catabolic then Latashia is not calando. All calando people are synthetic. If someone is calando and synthetic then they are catabolic. If someone is landscaped and not ecdemic then they are not calando. If Latashia is not calando then Latashia is not slimy. Latashia is not ecdemic.", "logic": "\nCalando(carmelina)\nCatabolic(latashia)\nSynthetic(anissa)\nCalando(lorne)\nforall x (Landscaped(x) and Calando(x) -> not Slimy(x))\nforall x (Ecdemic(x) and Synthetic(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Catabolic(x) -> Slimy(x))\nHeaded(latashia) and Catabolic(latashia) -> not Calando(latashia)\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) and Synthetic(x) -> Catabolic(x))\nforall x (Landscaped(x) and not Ecdemic(x) -> not Calando(x))\nnot Calando(latashia) -> not Slimy(latashia)\n\nnot Ecdemic(latashia)\n\nnot Ecdemic(latashia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Tuckie is undimmed. Mufinella is abusive. Danica is peltate. Cameron is undimmed. Cold, undimmed people are not squalling. Green, peltate people are squalling. Round people are squalling. If Mufinella is european and Mufinella is abusive then Mufinella is not undimmed. All undimmed people are peltate. If someone is undimmed and peltate then they are abusive. If someone is disliked and not conelike then they are not undimmed. If Mufinella is not undimmed then Mufinella is not squalling. Danica is conelike.", "logic": "\nUndimmed(tuckie)\nAbusive(mufinella)\nPeltate(danica)\nUndimmed(cameron)\nforall x (Disliked(x) and Undimmed(x) -> not Squalling(x))\nforall x (Conelike(x) and Peltate(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Squalling(x))\nEuropean(mufinella) and Abusive(mufinella) -> not Undimmed(mufinella)\nforall x (Undimmed(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Undimmed(x) and Peltate(x) -> Abusive(x))\nforall x (Disliked(x) and not Conelike(x) -> not Undimmed(x))\nnot Undimmed(mufinella) -> not Squalling(mufinella)\n\nConelike(danica)\n\nConelike(danica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1195"} {"premises": "Kristan is lxvi. Kristan is rhodesian. Kristan is valid. All fretted, lxvi people are miserable. All lxvi people are medicinal. If Kristan is fretted and Kristan is valid then Kristan is miserable. Kind, miserable people are caliginous. Smart people are fretted. If someone is rhodesian and fretted then they are valid. If someone is miserable and valid then they are lxvi. Round people are fretted. Kristan is valid.", "logic": "\nLxvi(kristan)\nRhodesian(kristan)\nValid(kristan)\nforall x (Fretted(x) and Lxvi(x) -> Miserable(x))\nforall x (Lxvi(x) -> Medicinal(x))\nFretted(kristan) and Valid(kristan) -> Miserable(kristan)\nforall x (Fretted(x) and Miserable(x) -> Caliginous(x))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Fretted(x))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) and Fretted(x) -> Valid(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) and Valid(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Miserable(x) -> Fretted(x))\n\nValid(kristan)\n\ntherefore Valid(kristan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Braden is typic. Braden is caecilian. Braden is relentless. All windswept, typic people are played. All typic people are waterproof. If Braden is windswept and Braden is relentless then Braden is played. Kind, played people are verrucose. Smart people are windswept. If someone is caecilian and windswept then they are relentless. If someone is played and relentless then they are typic. Round people are windswept. Braden is not relentless.", "logic": "\nTypic(braden)\nCaecilian(braden)\nRelentless(braden)\nforall x (Windswept(x) and Typic(x) -> Played(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) -> Waterproof(x))\nWindswept(braden) and Relentless(braden) -> Played(braden)\nforall x (Windswept(x) and Played(x) -> Verrucose(x))\nforall x (Waterproof(x) -> Windswept(x))\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and Windswept(x) -> Relentless(x))\nforall x (Played(x) and Relentless(x) -> Typic(x))\nforall x (Played(x) -> Windswept(x))\n\nnot Relentless(braden)\n\ntherefore Relentless(braden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Stella is attested. Stella is downfield. Stella is beginning. All linguistic, attested people are crashing. All attested people are dotty. If Stella is linguistic and Stella is beginning then Stella is crashing. Kind, crashing people are uneasy. Smart people are linguistic. If someone is downfield and linguistic then they are beginning. If someone is crashing and beginning then they are attested. Round people are linguistic. Stella is dotty.", "logic": "\nAttested(stella)\nDownfield(stella)\nBeginning(stella)\nforall x (Linguistic(x) and Attested(x) -> Crashing(x))\nforall x (Attested(x) -> Dotty(x))\nLinguistic(stella) and Beginning(stella) -> Crashing(stella)\nforall x (Linguistic(x) and Crashing(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Dotty(x) -> Linguistic(x))\nforall x (Downfield(x) and Linguistic(x) -> Beginning(x))\nforall x (Crashing(x) and Beginning(x) -> Attested(x))\nforall x (Crashing(x) -> Linguistic(x))\n\nDotty(stella)\n\nAttested(stella) and forall x (Attested(x) -> Dotty(x)) -> therefore Dotty(stella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Dick is tapered. Dick is grimy. Dick is answering. All mitotic, tapered people are takeout. All tapered people are caulked. If Dick is mitotic and Dick is answering then Dick is takeout. Kind, takeout people are matched. Smart people are mitotic. If someone is grimy and mitotic then they are answering. If someone is takeout and answering then they are tapered. Round people are mitotic. Dick is not caulked.", "logic": "\nTapered(dick)\nGrimy(dick)\nAnswering(dick)\nforall x (Mitotic(x) and Tapered(x) -> Takeout(x))\nforall x (Tapered(x) -> Caulked(x))\nMitotic(dick) and Answering(dick) -> Takeout(dick)\nforall x (Mitotic(x) and Takeout(x) -> Matched(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) -> Mitotic(x))\nforall x (Grimy(x) and Mitotic(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Takeout(x) and Answering(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Takeout(x) -> Mitotic(x))\n\nnot Caulked(dick)\n\nTapered(dick) and forall x (Tapered(x) -> Caulked(x)) -> therefore Caulked(dick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Sully is splattered. Sully is oleophobic. Sully is arcane. All bacterioid, splattered people are hypnogogic. All splattered people are nomadic. If Sully is bacterioid and Sully is arcane then Sully is hypnogogic. Kind, hypnogogic people are narcotized. Smart people are bacterioid. If someone is oleophobic and bacterioid then they are arcane. If someone is hypnogogic and arcane then they are splattered. Round people are bacterioid. Sully is bacterioid.", "logic": "\nSplattered(sully)\nOleophobic(sully)\nArcane(sully)\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and Splattered(x) -> Hypnogogic(x))\nforall x (Splattered(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nBacterioid(sully) and Arcane(sully) -> Hypnogogic(sully)\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and Hypnogogic(x) -> Narcotized(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Oleophobic(x) and Bacterioid(x) -> Arcane(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Arcane(x) -> Splattered(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\n\nBacterioid(sully)\n\nSplattered(sully) and forall x (Splattered(x) -> Nomadic(x)) -> therefore Nomadic(sully) Nomadic(sully) and forall x (Nomadic(x) -> Bacterioid(x)) -> therefore Bacterioid(sully)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Olin is libidinal. Olin is contrary. Olin is undefiled. All alacritous, libidinal people are bedfast. All libidinal people are huffish. If Olin is alacritous and Olin is undefiled then Olin is bedfast. Kind, bedfast people are percussive. Smart people are alacritous. If someone is contrary and alacritous then they are undefiled. If someone is bedfast and undefiled then they are libidinal. Round people are alacritous. Olin is not alacritous.", "logic": "\nLibidinal(olin)\nContrary(olin)\nUndefiled(olin)\nforall x (Alacritous(x) and Libidinal(x) -> Bedfast(x))\nforall x (Libidinal(x) -> Huffish(x))\nAlacritous(olin) and Undefiled(olin) -> Bedfast(olin)\nforall x (Alacritous(x) and Bedfast(x) -> Percussive(x))\nforall x (Huffish(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Contrary(x) and Alacritous(x) -> Undefiled(x))\nforall x (Bedfast(x) and Undefiled(x) -> Libidinal(x))\nforall x (Bedfast(x) -> Alacritous(x))\n\nnot Alacritous(olin)\n\nLibidinal(olin) and forall x (Libidinal(x) -> Huffish(x)) -> therefore Huffish(olin) Huffish(olin) and forall x (Huffish(x) -> Alacritous(x)) -> therefore Alacritous(olin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Boyce is viricidal. Boyce is chapfallen. Boyce is colorectal. All even, viricidal people are zonal. All viricidal people are adjective. If Boyce is even and Boyce is colorectal then Boyce is zonal. Kind, zonal people are verbatim. Smart people are even. If someone is chapfallen and even then they are colorectal. If someone is zonal and colorectal then they are viricidal. Round people are even. Boyce is zonal.", "logic": "\nViricidal(boyce)\nChapfallen(boyce)\nColorectal(boyce)\nforall x (Even(x) and Viricidal(x) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) -> Adjective(x))\nEven(boyce) and Colorectal(boyce) -> Zonal(boyce)\nforall x (Even(x) and Zonal(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Adjective(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and Even(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Colorectal(x) -> Viricidal(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) -> Even(x))\n\nZonal(boyce)\n\nViricidal(boyce) and forall x (Viricidal(x) -> Adjective(x)) -> therefore Adjective(boyce) Adjective(boyce) and forall x (Adjective(x) -> Even(x)) -> therefore Even(boyce) Even(boyce) and Viricidal(boyce) and forall x (Even(x) and Viricidal(x) -> Zonal(x)) -> therefore Zonal(boyce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Vivia is blustering. Vivia is unexampled. Vivia is mucous. All online, blustering people are spurned. All blustering people are optimum. If Vivia is online and Vivia is mucous then Vivia is spurned. Kind, spurned people are straggly. Smart people are online. If someone is unexampled and online then they are mucous. If someone is spurned and mucous then they are blustering. Round people are online. Vivia is not spurned.", "logic": "\nBlustering(vivia)\nUnexampled(vivia)\nMucous(vivia)\nforall x (Online(x) and Blustering(x) -> Spurned(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) -> Optimum(x))\nOnline(vivia) and Mucous(vivia) -> Spurned(vivia)\nforall x (Online(x) and Spurned(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Optimum(x) -> Online(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and Online(x) -> Mucous(x))\nforall x (Spurned(x) and Mucous(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Online(x))\n\nnot Spurned(vivia)\n\nBlustering(vivia) and forall x (Blustering(x) -> Optimum(x)) -> therefore Optimum(vivia) Optimum(vivia) and forall x (Optimum(x) -> Online(x)) -> therefore Online(vivia) Online(vivia) and Blustering(vivia) and forall x (Online(x) and Blustering(x) -> Spurned(x)) -> therefore Spurned(vivia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Adrick is alone. Adrick is rubberlike. Adrick is anserine. Adrick is quotidian. Josey is seismic. Josey is primaeval. Josey is quotidian. If something is rubberlike then it is alone. All quotidian things are rubberlike. Kind things are primaeval. Nice, anserine things are rubberlike. All alone things are miscible. If Adrick is seismic and Adrick is miscible then Adrick is quotidian. White things are seismic. All anserine things are primaeval. Adrick is anserine.", "logic": "\nAlone(adrick)\nRubberlike(adrick)\nAnserine(adrick)\nQuotidian(adrick)\nSeismic(josey)\nPrimaeval(josey)\nQuotidian(josey)\nforall x (Rubberlike(x) -> Alone(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> Rubberlike(x))\nforall x (Seismic(x) -> Primaeval(x))\nforall x (Primaeval(x) and Anserine(x) -> Rubberlike(x))\nforall x (Alone(x) -> Miscible(x))\nSeismic(adrick) and Miscible(adrick) -> Quotidian(adrick)\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> Seismic(x))\nforall x (Anserine(x) -> Primaeval(x))\n\nAnserine(adrick)\n\ntherefore Anserine(adrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Buddy is affirmable. Buddy is honorable. Buddy is unexceeded. Buddy is bellied. Reagan is secondary. Reagan is botulinal. Reagan is bellied. If something is honorable then it is affirmable. All bellied things are honorable. Kind things are botulinal. Nice, unexceeded things are honorable. All affirmable things are proscribed. If Buddy is secondary and Buddy is proscribed then Buddy is bellied. White things are secondary. All unexceeded things are botulinal. Reagan is not botulinal.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(buddy)\nHonorable(buddy)\nUnexceeded(buddy)\nBellied(buddy)\nSecondary(reagan)\nBotulinal(reagan)\nBellied(reagan)\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Secondary(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) and Unexceeded(x) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Proscribed(x))\nSecondary(buddy) and Proscribed(buddy) -> Bellied(buddy)\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> Secondary(x))\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Botulinal(x))\n\nnot Botulinal(reagan)\n\ntherefore Botulinal(reagan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Darbie is corroded. Darbie is unliveable. Darbie is shopsoiled. Darbie is precocial. Sibeal is boughless. Sibeal is nonresiny. Sibeal is precocial. If something is unliveable then it is corroded. All precocial things are unliveable. Kind things are nonresiny. Nice, shopsoiled things are unliveable. All corroded things are unlighted. If Darbie is boughless and Darbie is unlighted then Darbie is precocial. White things are boughless. All shopsoiled things are nonresiny. Sibeal is unliveable.", "logic": "\nCorroded(darbie)\nUnliveable(darbie)\nShopsoiled(darbie)\nPrecocial(darbie)\nBoughless(sibeal)\nNonresiny(sibeal)\nPrecocial(sibeal)\nforall x (Unliveable(x) -> Corroded(x))\nforall x (Precocial(x) -> Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Boughless(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Shopsoiled(x) -> Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Corroded(x) -> Unlighted(x))\nBoughless(darbie) and Unlighted(darbie) -> Precocial(darbie)\nforall x (Precocial(x) -> Boughless(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\n\nUnliveable(sibeal)\n\nPrecocial(sibeal) and forall x (Precocial(x) -> Unliveable(x)) -> therefore Unliveable(sibeal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Prasad is unmanly. Prasad is gnostic. Prasad is barbed. Prasad is coseismal. Camile is fraught. Camile is fifteenth. Camile is coseismal. If something is gnostic then it is unmanly. All coseismal things are gnostic. Kind things are fifteenth. Nice, barbed things are gnostic. All unmanly things are annexal. If Prasad is fraught and Prasad is annexal then Prasad is coseismal. White things are fraught. All barbed things are fifteenth. Prasad is not annexal.", "logic": "\nUnmanly(prasad)\nGnostic(prasad)\nBarbed(prasad)\nCoseismal(prasad)\nFraught(camile)\nFifteenth(camile)\nCoseismal(camile)\nforall x (Gnostic(x) -> Unmanly(x))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Fraught(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\nforall x (Fifteenth(x) and Barbed(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Unmanly(x) -> Annexal(x))\nFraught(prasad) and Annexal(prasad) -> Coseismal(prasad)\nforall x (Coseismal(x) -> Fraught(x))\nforall x (Barbed(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\n\nnot Annexal(prasad)\n\nUnmanly(prasad) and forall x (Unmanly(x) -> Annexal(x)) -> therefore Annexal(prasad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Erhart is austral. Erhart is demure. Erhart is flowered. Erhart is subject. Mimi is encouraged. Mimi is vindictive. Mimi is subject. If something is demure then it is austral. All subject things are demure. Kind things are vindictive. Nice, flowered things are demure. All austral things are active. If Erhart is encouraged and Erhart is active then Erhart is subject. White things are encouraged. All flowered things are vindictive. Mimi is austral.", "logic": "\nAustral(erhart)\nDemure(erhart)\nFlowered(erhart)\nSubject(erhart)\nEncouraged(mimi)\nVindictive(mimi)\nSubject(mimi)\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Austral(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Demure(x))\nforall x (Encouraged(x) -> Vindictive(x))\nforall x (Vindictive(x) and Flowered(x) -> Demure(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Active(x))\nEncouraged(erhart) and Active(erhart) -> Subject(erhart)\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Encouraged(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) -> Vindictive(x))\n\nAustral(mimi)\n\nSubject(mimi) and forall x (Subject(x) -> Demure(x)) -> therefore Demure(mimi) Demure(mimi) and forall x (Demure(x) -> Austral(x)) -> therefore Austral(mimi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Witold is mesmerized. Witold is nonwoody. Witold is forged. Witold is fibrillose. Blaine is acidic. Blaine is excitative. Blaine is fibrillose. If something is nonwoody then it is mesmerized. All fibrillose things are nonwoody. Kind things are excitative. Nice, forged things are nonwoody. All mesmerized things are weepy. If Witold is acidic and Witold is weepy then Witold is fibrillose. White things are acidic. All forged things are excitative. Blaine is not mesmerized.", "logic": "\nMesmerized(witold)\nNonwoody(witold)\nForged(witold)\nFibrillose(witold)\nAcidic(blaine)\nExcitative(blaine)\nFibrillose(blaine)\nforall x (Nonwoody(x) -> Mesmerized(x))\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Excitative(x))\nforall x (Excitative(x) and Forged(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) -> Weepy(x))\nAcidic(witold) and Weepy(witold) -> Fibrillose(witold)\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Forged(x) -> Excitative(x))\n\nnot Mesmerized(blaine)\n\nFibrillose(blaine) and forall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Nonwoody(x)) -> therefore Nonwoody(blaine) Nonwoody(blaine) and forall x (Nonwoody(x) -> Mesmerized(x)) -> therefore Mesmerized(blaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Lincoln is insistent. Lincoln is punished. Lincoln is outlaw. Lincoln is sportive. Brear is tapped. Brear is viatical. Brear is sportive. If something is punished then it is insistent. All sportive things are punished. Kind things are viatical. Nice, outlaw things are punished. All insistent things are endemical. If Lincoln is tapped and Lincoln is endemical then Lincoln is sportive. White things are tapped. All outlaw things are viatical. Brear is endemical.", "logic": "\nInsistent(lincoln)\nPunished(lincoln)\nOutlaw(lincoln)\nSportive(lincoln)\nTapped(brear)\nViatical(brear)\nSportive(brear)\nforall x (Punished(x) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Sportive(x) -> Punished(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) and Outlaw(x) -> Punished(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) -> Endemical(x))\nTapped(lincoln) and Endemical(lincoln) -> Sportive(lincoln)\nforall x (Sportive(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Outlaw(x) -> Viatical(x))\n\nEndemical(brear)\n\nSportive(brear) and forall x (Sportive(x) -> Punished(x)) -> therefore Punished(brear) Punished(brear) and forall x (Punished(x) -> Insistent(x)) -> therefore Insistent(brear) Insistent(brear) and forall x (Insistent(x) -> Endemical(x)) -> therefore Endemical(brear)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Ralina is ribbonlike. Ralina is resistive. Ralina is ebon. Ralina is hefty. Duffy is uncaulked. Duffy is blissful. Duffy is hefty. If something is resistive then it is ribbonlike. All hefty things are resistive. Kind things are blissful. Nice, ebon things are resistive. All ribbonlike things are lipotropic. If Ralina is uncaulked and Ralina is lipotropic then Ralina is hefty. White things are uncaulked. All ebon things are blissful. Duffy is not lipotropic.", "logic": "\nRibbonlike(ralina)\nResistive(ralina)\nEbon(ralina)\nHefty(ralina)\nUncaulked(duffy)\nBlissful(duffy)\nHefty(duffy)\nforall x (Resistive(x) -> Ribbonlike(x))\nforall x (Hefty(x) -> Resistive(x))\nforall x (Uncaulked(x) -> Blissful(x))\nforall x (Blissful(x) and Ebon(x) -> Resistive(x))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) -> Lipotropic(x))\nUncaulked(ralina) and Lipotropic(ralina) -> Hefty(ralina)\nforall x (Hefty(x) -> Uncaulked(x))\nforall x (Ebon(x) -> Blissful(x))\n\nnot Lipotropic(duffy)\n\nHefty(duffy) and forall x (Hefty(x) -> Resistive(x)) -> therefore Resistive(duffy) Resistive(duffy) and forall x (Resistive(x) -> Ribbonlike(x)) -> therefore Ribbonlike(duffy) Ribbonlike(duffy) and forall x (Ribbonlike(x) -> Lipotropic(x)) -> therefore Lipotropic(duffy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "The isabeau enplane the kiele. The isabeau conglobe the kiele. The isabeau is private. The isabeau is papuan. The isabeau is onerous. The isabeau is troublous. The isabeau snowball the kiele. The kiele enplane the isabeau. The kiele conglobe the isabeau. The kiele is private. The kiele is papuan. The kiele is casual. The kiele is onerous. The kiele is troublous. The kiele snowball the isabeau. If something enplane the kiele then it conglobe the kiele. If something snowball the kiele and the kiele is casual then it enplane the kiele. If the isabeau conglobe the kiele and the kiele is onerous then the kiele conglobe the isabeau. If something is private then it enplane the kiele. If something conglobe the kiele then it snowball the kiele. If the kiele enplane the isabeau and the isabeau is troublous then the kiele is onerous. The isabeau conglobe the kiele.", "logic": "\nEnplane(isabeau, kiele)\nConglobe(isabeau, kiele)\nPrivate(isabeau)\nPapuan(isabeau)\nOnerous(isabeau)\nTroublous(isabeau)\nSnowball(isabeau, kiele)\nEnplane(kiele, isabeau)\nConglobe(kiele, isabeau)\nPrivate(kiele)\nPapuan(kiele)\nCasual(kiele)\nOnerous(kiele)\nTroublous(kiele)\nSnowball(kiele, isabeau)\nforall x (Enplane(x, kiele) -> Conglobe(x, kiele))\nforall x (Snowball(x, kiele) and Casual(kiele) -> Enplane(x, kiele))\nConglobe(isabeau, kiele) and Onerous(kiele) -> Conglobe(kiele, isabeau)\nforall x (Private(x) -> Enplane(x, kiele))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, kiele) -> Snowball(x, kiele))\nEnplane(kiele, isabeau) and Troublous(isabeau) -> Onerous(kiele)\n\nConglobe(isabeau, kiele)\n\ntherefore Conglobe(isabeau, kiele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The garrot lyophilize the judson. The garrot mosey the judson. The garrot is distrait. The garrot is pilar. The garrot is cranial. The garrot is toasted. The garrot cost the judson. The judson lyophilize the garrot. The judson mosey the garrot. The judson is distrait. The judson is pilar. The judson is buzzing. The judson is cranial. The judson is toasted. The judson cost the garrot. If something lyophilize the judson then it mosey the judson. If something cost the judson and the judson is buzzing then it lyophilize the judson. If the garrot mosey the judson and the judson is cranial then the judson mosey the garrot. If something is distrait then it lyophilize the judson. If something mosey the judson then it cost the judson. If the judson lyophilize the garrot and the garrot is toasted then the judson is cranial. The judson does not like the garrot.", "logic": "\nLyophilize(garrot, judson)\nMosey(garrot, judson)\nDistrait(garrot)\nPilar(garrot)\nCranial(garrot)\nToasted(garrot)\nCost(garrot, judson)\nLyophilize(judson, garrot)\nMosey(judson, garrot)\nDistrait(judson)\nPilar(judson)\nBuzzing(judson)\nCranial(judson)\nToasted(judson)\nCost(judson, garrot)\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, judson) -> Mosey(x, judson))\nforall x (Cost(x, judson) and Buzzing(judson) -> Lyophilize(x, judson))\nMosey(garrot, judson) and Cranial(judson) -> Mosey(judson, garrot)\nforall x (Distrait(x) -> Lyophilize(x, judson))\nforall x (Mosey(x, judson) -> Cost(x, judson))\nLyophilize(judson, garrot) and Toasted(garrot) -> Cranial(judson)\n\nnot Cost(judson, garrot)\n\ntherefore Cost(judson, garrot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The owen trundle the danielle. The owen waft the danielle. The owen is nuclear. The owen is codified. The owen is caffeinic. The owen is polychrome. The owen dare the danielle. The danielle trundle the owen. The danielle waft the owen. The danielle is nuclear. The danielle is codified. The danielle is readable. The danielle is caffeinic. The danielle is polychrome. The danielle dare the owen. If something trundle the danielle then it waft the danielle. If something dare the danielle and the danielle is readable then it trundle the danielle. If the owen waft the danielle and the danielle is caffeinic then the danielle waft the owen. If something is nuclear then it trundle the danielle. If something waft the danielle then it dare the danielle. If the danielle trundle the owen and the owen is polychrome then the danielle is caffeinic. The danielle trundle the danielle.", "logic": "\nTrundle(owen, danielle)\nWaft(owen, danielle)\nNuclear(owen)\nCodified(owen)\nCaffeinic(owen)\nPolychrome(owen)\nDare(owen, danielle)\nTrundle(danielle, owen)\nWaft(danielle, owen)\nNuclear(danielle)\nCodified(danielle)\nReadable(danielle)\nCaffeinic(danielle)\nPolychrome(danielle)\nDare(danielle, owen)\nforall x (Trundle(x, danielle) -> Waft(x, danielle))\nforall x (Dare(x, danielle) and Readable(danielle) -> Trundle(x, danielle))\nWaft(owen, danielle) and Caffeinic(danielle) -> Waft(danielle, owen)\nforall x (Nuclear(x) -> Trundle(x, danielle))\nforall x (Waft(x, danielle) -> Dare(x, danielle))\nTrundle(danielle, owen) and Polychrome(owen) -> Caffeinic(danielle)\n\nTrundle(danielle, danielle)\n\nNuclear(danielle) and forall x (Nuclear(x) -> Trundle(x, danielle)) -> therefore Trundle(danielle, danielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The dedie vaticinate the chantalle. The dedie murder the chantalle. The dedie is veterinary. The dedie is painterly. The dedie is engrossed. The dedie is auxetic. The dedie hoover the chantalle. The chantalle vaticinate the dedie. The chantalle murder the dedie. The chantalle is veterinary. The chantalle is painterly. The chantalle is salacious. The chantalle is engrossed. The chantalle is auxetic. The chantalle hoover the dedie. If something vaticinate the chantalle then it murder the chantalle. If something hoover the chantalle and the chantalle is salacious then it vaticinate the chantalle. If the dedie murder the chantalle and the chantalle is engrossed then the chantalle murder the dedie. If something is veterinary then it vaticinate the chantalle. If something murder the chantalle then it hoover the chantalle. If the chantalle vaticinate the dedie and the dedie is auxetic then the chantalle is engrossed. The chantalle does not chase the chantalle.", "logic": "\nVaticinate(dedie, chantalle)\nMurder(dedie, chantalle)\nVeterinary(dedie)\nPainterly(dedie)\nEngrossed(dedie)\nAuxetic(dedie)\nHoover(dedie, chantalle)\nVaticinate(chantalle, dedie)\nMurder(chantalle, dedie)\nVeterinary(chantalle)\nPainterly(chantalle)\nSalacious(chantalle)\nEngrossed(chantalle)\nAuxetic(chantalle)\nHoover(chantalle, dedie)\nforall x (Vaticinate(x, chantalle) -> Murder(x, chantalle))\nforall x (Hoover(x, chantalle) and Salacious(chantalle) -> Vaticinate(x, chantalle))\nMurder(dedie, chantalle) and Engrossed(chantalle) -> Murder(chantalle, dedie)\nforall x (Veterinary(x) -> Vaticinate(x, chantalle))\nforall x (Murder(x, chantalle) -> Hoover(x, chantalle))\nVaticinate(chantalle, dedie) and Auxetic(dedie) -> Engrossed(chantalle)\n\nnot Vaticinate(chantalle, chantalle)\n\nVeterinary(chantalle) and forall x (Veterinary(x) -> Vaticinate(x, chantalle)) -> therefore Vaticinate(chantalle, chantalle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The traci disco the zackariah. The traci smut the zackariah. The traci is plump. The traci is unfathomed. The traci is asyndetic. The traci is thirty. The traci enfeeble the zackariah. The zackariah disco the traci. The zackariah smut the traci. The zackariah is plump. The zackariah is unfathomed. The zackariah is mercerized. The zackariah is asyndetic. The zackariah is thirty. The zackariah enfeeble the traci. If something disco the zackariah then it smut the zackariah. If something enfeeble the zackariah and the zackariah is mercerized then it disco the zackariah. If the traci smut the zackariah and the zackariah is asyndetic then the zackariah smut the traci. If something is plump then it disco the zackariah. If something smut the zackariah then it enfeeble the zackariah. If the zackariah disco the traci and the traci is thirty then the zackariah is asyndetic. The zackariah smut the zackariah.", "logic": "\nDisco(traci, zackariah)\nSmut(traci, zackariah)\nPlump(traci)\nUnfathomed(traci)\nAsyndetic(traci)\nThirty(traci)\nEnfeeble(traci, zackariah)\nDisco(zackariah, traci)\nSmut(zackariah, traci)\nPlump(zackariah)\nUnfathomed(zackariah)\nMercerized(zackariah)\nAsyndetic(zackariah)\nThirty(zackariah)\nEnfeeble(zackariah, traci)\nforall x (Disco(x, zackariah) -> Smut(x, zackariah))\nforall x (Enfeeble(x, zackariah) and Mercerized(zackariah) -> Disco(x, zackariah))\nSmut(traci, zackariah) and Asyndetic(zackariah) -> Smut(zackariah, traci)\nforall x (Plump(x) -> Disco(x, zackariah))\nforall x (Smut(x, zackariah) -> Enfeeble(x, zackariah))\nDisco(zackariah, traci) and Thirty(traci) -> Asyndetic(zackariah)\n\nSmut(zackariah, zackariah)\n\nPlump(zackariah) and forall x (Plump(x) -> Disco(x, zackariah)) -> therefore Disco(zackariah, zackariah) Disco(zackariah, zackariah) and forall x (Disco(x, zackariah) -> Smut(x, zackariah)) -> therefore Smut(zackariah, zackariah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The jaclin defrost the charla. The jaclin hatch the charla. The jaclin is shelvy. The jaclin is velvet. The jaclin is inviting. The jaclin is citywide. The jaclin filtrate the charla. The charla defrost the jaclin. The charla hatch the jaclin. The charla is shelvy. The charla is velvet. The charla is topnotch. The charla is inviting. The charla is citywide. The charla filtrate the jaclin. If something defrost the charla then it hatch the charla. If something filtrate the charla and the charla is topnotch then it defrost the charla. If the jaclin hatch the charla and the charla is inviting then the charla hatch the jaclin. If something is shelvy then it defrost the charla. If something hatch the charla then it filtrate the charla. If the charla defrost the jaclin and the jaclin is citywide then the charla is inviting. The charla does not eat the charla.", "logic": "\nDefrost(jaclin, charla)\nHatch(jaclin, charla)\nShelvy(jaclin)\nVelvet(jaclin)\nInviting(jaclin)\nCitywide(jaclin)\nFiltrate(jaclin, charla)\nDefrost(charla, jaclin)\nHatch(charla, jaclin)\nShelvy(charla)\nVelvet(charla)\nTopnotch(charla)\nInviting(charla)\nCitywide(charla)\nFiltrate(charla, jaclin)\nforall x (Defrost(x, charla) -> Hatch(x, charla))\nforall x (Filtrate(x, charla) and Topnotch(charla) -> Defrost(x, charla))\nHatch(jaclin, charla) and Inviting(charla) -> Hatch(charla, jaclin)\nforall x (Shelvy(x) -> Defrost(x, charla))\nforall x (Hatch(x, charla) -> Filtrate(x, charla))\nDefrost(charla, jaclin) and Citywide(jaclin) -> Inviting(charla)\n\nnot Hatch(charla, charla)\n\nShelvy(charla) and forall x (Shelvy(x) -> Defrost(x, charla)) -> therefore Defrost(charla, charla) Defrost(charla, charla) and forall x (Defrost(x, charla) -> Hatch(x, charla)) -> therefore Hatch(charla, charla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The jennee subsidise the amos. The jennee anathemize the amos. The jennee is untroubled. The jennee is suffering. The jennee is comical. The jennee is cheap. The jennee coach the amos. The amos subsidise the jennee. The amos anathemize the jennee. The amos is untroubled. The amos is suffering. The amos is reflexive. The amos is comical. The amos is cheap. The amos coach the jennee. If something subsidise the amos then it anathemize the amos. If something coach the amos and the amos is reflexive then it subsidise the amos. If the jennee anathemize the amos and the amos is comical then the amos anathemize the jennee. If something is untroubled then it subsidise the amos. If something anathemize the amos then it coach the amos. If the amos subsidise the jennee and the jennee is cheap then the amos is comical. The amos coach the amos.", "logic": "\nSubsidise(jennee, amos)\nAnathemize(jennee, amos)\nUntroubled(jennee)\nSuffering(jennee)\nComical(jennee)\nCheap(jennee)\nCoach(jennee, amos)\nSubsidise(amos, jennee)\nAnathemize(amos, jennee)\nUntroubled(amos)\nSuffering(amos)\nReflexive(amos)\nComical(amos)\nCheap(amos)\nCoach(amos, jennee)\nforall x (Subsidise(x, amos) -> Anathemize(x, amos))\nforall x (Coach(x, amos) and Reflexive(amos) -> Subsidise(x, amos))\nAnathemize(jennee, amos) and Comical(amos) -> Anathemize(amos, jennee)\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Subsidise(x, amos))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, amos) -> Coach(x, amos))\nSubsidise(amos, jennee) and Cheap(jennee) -> Comical(amos)\n\nCoach(amos, amos)\n\nUntroubled(amos) and forall x (Untroubled(x) -> Subsidise(x, amos)) -> therefore Subsidise(amos, amos) Subsidise(amos, amos) and forall x (Subsidise(x, amos) -> Anathemize(x, amos)) -> therefore Anathemize(amos, amos) Anathemize(amos, amos) and forall x (Anathemize(x, amos) -> Coach(x, amos)) -> therefore Coach(amos, amos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The winnah ransack the andromeda. The winnah maledict the andromeda. The winnah is rectified. The winnah is calm. The winnah is brave. The winnah is inelastic. The winnah scrutinize the andromeda. The andromeda ransack the winnah. The andromeda maledict the winnah. The andromeda is rectified. The andromeda is calm. The andromeda is flavorous. The andromeda is brave. The andromeda is inelastic. The andromeda scrutinize the winnah. If something ransack the andromeda then it maledict the andromeda. If something scrutinize the andromeda and the andromeda is flavorous then it ransack the andromeda. If the winnah maledict the andromeda and the andromeda is brave then the andromeda maledict the winnah. If something is rectified then it ransack the andromeda. If something maledict the andromeda then it scrutinize the andromeda. If the andromeda ransack the winnah and the winnah is inelastic then the andromeda is brave. The andromeda does not like the andromeda.", "logic": "\nRansack(winnah, andromeda)\nMaledict(winnah, andromeda)\nRectified(winnah)\nCalm(winnah)\nBrave(winnah)\nInelastic(winnah)\nScrutinize(winnah, andromeda)\nRansack(andromeda, winnah)\nMaledict(andromeda, winnah)\nRectified(andromeda)\nCalm(andromeda)\nFlavorous(andromeda)\nBrave(andromeda)\nInelastic(andromeda)\nScrutinize(andromeda, winnah)\nforall x (Ransack(x, andromeda) -> Maledict(x, andromeda))\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, andromeda) and Flavorous(andromeda) -> Ransack(x, andromeda))\nMaledict(winnah, andromeda) and Brave(andromeda) -> Maledict(andromeda, winnah)\nforall x (Rectified(x) -> Ransack(x, andromeda))\nforall x (Maledict(x, andromeda) -> Scrutinize(x, andromeda))\nRansack(andromeda, winnah) and Inelastic(winnah) -> Brave(andromeda)\n\nnot Scrutinize(andromeda, andromeda)\n\nRectified(andromeda) and forall x (Rectified(x) -> Ransack(x, andromeda)) -> therefore Ransack(andromeda, andromeda) Ransack(andromeda, andromeda) and forall x (Ransack(x, andromeda) -> Maledict(x, andromeda)) -> therefore Maledict(andromeda, andromeda) Maledict(andromeda, andromeda) and forall x (Maledict(x, andromeda) -> Scrutinize(x, andromeda)) -> therefore Scrutinize(andromeda, andromeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The kristal embrangle the kenna. The kristal stash the kenna. The kristal is pure. The kristal is arenaceous. The kristal is beatific. The kristal is unvented. The kristal concede the kenna. The kenna embrangle the kristal. The kenna stash the kristal. The kenna is pure. The kenna is arenaceous. The kenna is spoken. The kenna is beatific. The kenna is unvented. The kenna concede the kristal. If something embrangle the kenna then it stash the kenna. If something concede the kenna and the kenna is spoken then it embrangle the kenna. If the kristal stash the kenna and the kenna is beatific then the kenna stash the kristal. If something is pure then it embrangle the kenna. If something stash the kenna then it concede the kenna. If the kenna embrangle the kristal and the kristal is unvented then the kenna is beatific. The kristal does not eat the kristal.", "logic": "\nEmbrangle(kristal, kenna)\nStash(kristal, kenna)\nPure(kristal)\nArenaceous(kristal)\nBeatific(kristal)\nUnvented(kristal)\nConcede(kristal, kenna)\nEmbrangle(kenna, kristal)\nStash(kenna, kristal)\nPure(kenna)\nArenaceous(kenna)\nSpoken(kenna)\nBeatific(kenna)\nUnvented(kenna)\nConcede(kenna, kristal)\nforall x (Embrangle(x, kenna) -> Stash(x, kenna))\nforall x (Concede(x, kenna) and Spoken(kenna) -> Embrangle(x, kenna))\nStash(kristal, kenna) and Beatific(kenna) -> Stash(kenna, kristal)\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Embrangle(x, kenna))\nforall x (Stash(x, kenna) -> Concede(x, kenna))\nEmbrangle(kenna, kristal) and Unvented(kristal) -> Beatific(kenna)\n\nnot Stash(kristal, kristal)\n\nnot Stash(kristal, kristal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The emmanuel crave the renae. The emmanuel unspell the renae. The emmanuel is befogged. The emmanuel is anaemic. The emmanuel is overbold. The emmanuel is regulated. The emmanuel bemire the renae. The renae crave the emmanuel. The renae unspell the emmanuel. The renae is befogged. The renae is anaemic. The renae is genovese. The renae is overbold. The renae is regulated. The renae bemire the emmanuel. If something crave the renae then it unspell the renae. If something bemire the renae and the renae is genovese then it crave the renae. If the emmanuel unspell the renae and the renae is overbold then the renae unspell the emmanuel. If something is befogged then it crave the renae. If something unspell the renae then it bemire the renae. If the renae crave the emmanuel and the emmanuel is regulated then the renae is overbold. The emmanuel is genovese.", "logic": "\nCrave(emmanuel, renae)\nUnspell(emmanuel, renae)\nBefogged(emmanuel)\nAnaemic(emmanuel)\nOverbold(emmanuel)\nRegulated(emmanuel)\nBemire(emmanuel, renae)\nCrave(renae, emmanuel)\nUnspell(renae, emmanuel)\nBefogged(renae)\nAnaemic(renae)\nGenovese(renae)\nOverbold(renae)\nRegulated(renae)\nBemire(renae, emmanuel)\nforall x (Crave(x, renae) -> Unspell(x, renae))\nforall x (Bemire(x, renae) and Genovese(renae) -> Crave(x, renae))\nUnspell(emmanuel, renae) and Overbold(renae) -> Unspell(renae, emmanuel)\nforall x (Befogged(x) -> Crave(x, renae))\nforall x (Unspell(x, renae) -> Bemire(x, renae))\nCrave(renae, emmanuel) and Regulated(emmanuel) -> Overbold(renae)\n\nGenovese(emmanuel)\n\nGenovese(emmanuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The riki lambaste the bartel. The riki ponder the bartel. The riki is demoniac. The riki is aeriform. The riki is frenetic. The riki is laid. The riki vocalise the bartel. The bartel lambaste the riki. The bartel ponder the riki. The bartel is demoniac. The bartel is aeriform. The bartel is prescribed. The bartel is frenetic. The bartel is laid. The bartel vocalise the riki. If something lambaste the bartel then it ponder the bartel. If something vocalise the bartel and the bartel is prescribed then it lambaste the bartel. If the riki ponder the bartel and the bartel is frenetic then the bartel ponder the riki. If something is demoniac then it lambaste the bartel. If something ponder the bartel then it vocalise the bartel. If the bartel lambaste the riki and the riki is laid then the bartel is frenetic. The riki does not chase the riki.", "logic": "\nLambaste(riki, bartel)\nPonder(riki, bartel)\nDemoniac(riki)\nAeriform(riki)\nFrenetic(riki)\nLaid(riki)\nVocalise(riki, bartel)\nLambaste(bartel, riki)\nPonder(bartel, riki)\nDemoniac(bartel)\nAeriform(bartel)\nPrescribed(bartel)\nFrenetic(bartel)\nLaid(bartel)\nVocalise(bartel, riki)\nforall x (Lambaste(x, bartel) -> Ponder(x, bartel))\nforall x (Vocalise(x, bartel) and Prescribed(bartel) -> Lambaste(x, bartel))\nPonder(riki, bartel) and Frenetic(bartel) -> Ponder(bartel, riki)\nforall x (Demoniac(x) -> Lambaste(x, bartel))\nforall x (Ponder(x, bartel) -> Vocalise(x, bartel))\nLambaste(bartel, riki) and Laid(riki) -> Frenetic(bartel)\n\nnot Lambaste(riki, riki)\n\nnot Lambaste(riki, riki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The france liberate the andi. The france surfboard the andi. The france is tripinnate. The france is teentsy. The france is testaceous. The france is mnemonic. The france ruck the andi. The andi liberate the france. The andi surfboard the france. The andi is tripinnate. The andi is teentsy. The andi is extinct. The andi is testaceous. The andi is mnemonic. The andi ruck the france. If something liberate the andi then it surfboard the andi. If something ruck the andi and the andi is extinct then it liberate the andi. If the france surfboard the andi and the andi is testaceous then the andi surfboard the france. If something is tripinnate then it liberate the andi. If something surfboard the andi then it ruck the andi. If the andi liberate the france and the france is mnemonic then the andi is testaceous. The france ruck the france.", "logic": "\nLiberate(france, andi)\nSurfboard(france, andi)\nTripinnate(france)\nTeentsy(france)\nTestaceous(france)\nMnemonic(france)\nRuck(france, andi)\nLiberate(andi, france)\nSurfboard(andi, france)\nTripinnate(andi)\nTeentsy(andi)\nExtinct(andi)\nTestaceous(andi)\nMnemonic(andi)\nRuck(andi, france)\nforall x (Liberate(x, andi) -> Surfboard(x, andi))\nforall x (Ruck(x, andi) and Extinct(andi) -> Liberate(x, andi))\nSurfboard(france, andi) and Testaceous(andi) -> Surfboard(andi, france)\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) -> Liberate(x, andi))\nforall x (Surfboard(x, andi) -> Ruck(x, andi))\nLiberate(andi, france) and Mnemonic(france) -> Testaceous(andi)\n\nRuck(france, france)\n\nRuck(france, france) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1328"} {"premises": "The berta is fatless. All spindly things are bisontine. All bisontine things are slithering. All fatless things are bisontine. Rough things are stringent. All stringent, fatless things are bisontine. Round, stringent things are slithering. The berta is fatless.", "logic": "\nFatless(berta)\nforall x (Spindly(x) -> Bisontine(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Slithering(x))\nforall x (Fatless(x) -> Bisontine(x))\nforall x (Slithering(x) -> Stringent(x))\nforall x (Stringent(x) and Fatless(x) -> Bisontine(x))\nforall x (Fatless(x) and Stringent(x) -> Slithering(x))\n\nFatless(berta)\n\ntherefore Fatless(berta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The simona is trusty. All pavlovian things are syrupy. All syrupy things are auriferous. All trusty things are syrupy. Rough things are apomictic. All apomictic, trusty things are syrupy. Round, apomictic things are auriferous. The simona is not trusty.", "logic": "\nTrusty(simona)\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) -> Syrupy(x))\nforall x (Syrupy(x) -> Auriferous(x))\nforall x (Trusty(x) -> Syrupy(x))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Apomictic(x))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) and Trusty(x) -> Syrupy(x))\nforall x (Trusty(x) and Apomictic(x) -> Auriferous(x))\n\nnot Trusty(simona)\n\ntherefore Trusty(simona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The marc is roast. All costumed things are embodied. All embodied things are atheist. All roast things are embodied. Rough things are malthusian. All malthusian, roast things are embodied. Round, malthusian things are atheist. The marc is embodied.", "logic": "\nRoast(marc)\nforall x (Costumed(x) -> Embodied(x))\nforall x (Embodied(x) -> Atheist(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) -> Embodied(x))\nforall x (Atheist(x) -> Malthusian(x))\nforall x (Malthusian(x) and Roast(x) -> Embodied(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) and Malthusian(x) -> Atheist(x))\n\nEmbodied(marc)\n\nRoast(marc) and forall x (Roast(x) -> Embodied(x)) -> therefore Embodied(marc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The xena is anginal. All indicative things are fervid. All fervid things are apocryphal. All anginal things are fervid. Rough things are grueling. All grueling, anginal things are fervid. Round, grueling things are apocryphal. The xena is not fervid.", "logic": "\nAnginal(xena)\nforall x (Indicative(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Fervid(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\nforall x (Anginal(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Grueling(x) and Anginal(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Anginal(x) and Grueling(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\n\nnot Fervid(xena)\n\nAnginal(xena) and forall x (Anginal(x) -> Fervid(x)) -> therefore Fervid(xena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The flossy is concerned. All thyroid things are maplelike. All maplelike things are laic. All concerned things are maplelike. Rough things are expensive. All expensive, concerned things are maplelike. Round, expensive things are laic. The flossy is laic.", "logic": "\nConcerned(flossy)\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Maplelike(x))\nforall x (Maplelike(x) -> Laic(x))\nforall x (Concerned(x) -> Maplelike(x))\nforall x (Laic(x) -> Expensive(x))\nforall x (Expensive(x) and Concerned(x) -> Maplelike(x))\nforall x (Concerned(x) and Expensive(x) -> Laic(x))\n\nLaic(flossy)\n\nConcerned(flossy) and forall x (Concerned(x) -> Maplelike(x)) -> therefore Maplelike(flossy) Maplelike(flossy) and forall x (Maplelike(x) -> Laic(x)) -> therefore Laic(flossy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The ricard is overt. All threescore things are south. All south things are imbecile. All overt things are south. Rough things are protective. All protective, overt things are south. Round, protective things are imbecile. The ricard is not imbecile.", "logic": "\nOvert(ricard)\nforall x (Threescore(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (South(x) -> Imbecile(x))\nforall x (Overt(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (Imbecile(x) -> Protective(x))\nforall x (Protective(x) and Overt(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (Overt(x) and Protective(x) -> Imbecile(x))\n\nnot Imbecile(ricard)\n\nOvert(ricard) and forall x (Overt(x) -> South(x)) -> therefore South(ricard) South(ricard) and forall x (South(x) -> Imbecile(x)) -> therefore Imbecile(ricard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The melosa is serologic. All sown things are bibless. All bibless things are destined. All serologic things are bibless. Rough things are guardant. All guardant, serologic things are bibless. Round, guardant things are destined. The melosa is guardant.", "logic": "\nSerologic(melosa)\nforall x (Sown(x) -> Bibless(x))\nforall x (Bibless(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Serologic(x) -> Bibless(x))\nforall x (Destined(x) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Guardant(x) and Serologic(x) -> Bibless(x))\nforall x (Serologic(x) and Guardant(x) -> Destined(x))\n\nGuardant(melosa)\n\nSerologic(melosa) and forall x (Serologic(x) -> Bibless(x)) -> therefore Bibless(melosa) Bibless(melosa) and forall x (Bibless(x) -> Destined(x)) -> therefore Destined(melosa) Destined(melosa) and forall x (Destined(x) -> Guardant(x)) -> therefore Guardant(melosa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The yuri is acold. All unavailing things are duncish. All duncish things are difficult. All acold things are duncish. Rough things are communist. All communist, acold things are duncish. Round, communist things are difficult. The yuri is not communist.", "logic": "\nAcold(yuri)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> Difficult(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Difficult(x) -> Communist(x))\nforall x (Communist(x) and Acold(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) and Communist(x) -> Difficult(x))\n\nnot Communist(yuri)\n\nAcold(yuri) and forall x (Acold(x) -> Duncish(x)) -> therefore Duncish(yuri) Duncish(yuri) and forall x (Duncish(x) -> Difficult(x)) -> therefore Difficult(yuri) Difficult(yuri) and forall x (Difficult(x) -> Communist(x)) -> therefore Communist(yuri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The elberta is monastic. All malapropos things are bankrupt. All bankrupt things are unsaddled. All monastic things are bankrupt. Rough things are disjointed. All disjointed, monastic things are bankrupt. Round, disjointed things are unsaddled. The elberta does not need the elberta.", "logic": "\nMonastic(elberta)\nforall x (Malapropos(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Monastic(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) and Monastic(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Monastic(x) and Disjointed(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\n\nnot Needs(elberta, elberta)\n\nnot Needs(elberta, elberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The kayla is chiasmal. All intertidal things are exiguous. All exiguous things are guinean. All chiasmal things are exiguous. Rough things are expendable. All expendable, chiasmal things are exiguous. Round, expendable things are guinean. The kayla is intertidal.", "logic": "\nChiasmal(kayla)\nforall x (Intertidal(x) -> Exiguous(x))\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Chiasmal(x) -> Exiguous(x))\nforall x (Guinean(x) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Expendable(x) and Chiasmal(x) -> Exiguous(x))\nforall x (Chiasmal(x) and Expendable(x) -> Guinean(x))\n\nIntertidal(kayla)\n\nIntertidal(kayla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The berte is beastly. All cobwebby things are aging. All aging things are rolling. All beastly things are aging. Rough things are hieratical. All hieratical, beastly things are aging. Round, hieratical things are rolling. The berte does not like the berte.", "logic": "\nBeastly(berte)\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Aging(x) -> Rolling(x))\nforall x (Beastly(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Beastly(x) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Beastly(x) and Hieratical(x) -> Rolling(x))\n\nnot Likes(berte, berte)\n\nnot Likes(berte, berte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The harland is idiomatic. All widowed things are fulsome. All fulsome things are abranchial. All idiomatic things are fulsome. Rough things are mere. All mere, idiomatic things are fulsome. Round, mere things are abranchial. The harland chases the harland.", "logic": "\nIdiomatic(harland)\nforall x (Widowed(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Fulsome(x) -> Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) -> Mere(x))\nforall x (Mere(x) and Idiomatic(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) and Mere(x) -> Abranchial(x))\n\nChases(harland, harland)\n\nChases(harland, harland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The rycca does not eat the morganica. The rycca is planar. The rycca ammoniate the morganica. The rycca congest the morganica. The rycca congest the juditha. The morganica ionise the rycca. The morganica ionise the juditha. The morganica is toed. The morganica is planar. The morganica is gumptious. The morganica ammoniate the juditha. The juditha ionise the morganica. The juditha is toed. The juditha is gumptious. The juditha congest the rycca. The juditha congest the morganica. If the juditha congest the morganica and the juditha is not seeded then the morganica congest the juditha. If someone ionise the morganica and they are not gumptious then the morganica does not eat the rycca. If someone ionise the rycca and the rycca is gumptious then the rycca is not endogamic. If someone ionise the rycca then they eat the juditha. If someone is endogamic then they eat the rycca. If someone ionise the juditha and the juditha ionise the morganica then the juditha is endogamic. If the rycca does not eat the juditha then the rycca congest the morganica. If the rycca congest the morganica then the rycca congest the juditha. The rycca congest the juditha.", "logic": "\nnot Ionise(rycca, morganica)\nPlanar(rycca)\nAmmoniate(rycca, morganica)\nCongest(rycca, morganica)\nCongest(rycca, juditha)\nIonise(morganica, rycca)\nIonise(morganica, juditha)\nToed(morganica)\nPlanar(morganica)\nGumptious(morganica)\nAmmoniate(morganica, juditha)\nIonise(juditha, morganica)\nToed(juditha)\nGumptious(juditha)\nCongest(juditha, rycca)\nCongest(juditha, morganica)\nCongest(juditha, morganica) and not Seeded(juditha) -> Congest(morganica, juditha)\nforall x (Ionise(x, morganica) and not Gumptious(x) -> not Ionise(morganica, rycca))\nforall x (Ionise(x, rycca) and Gumptious(rycca) -> not Endogamic(rycca))\nforall x (Ionise(x, rycca) -> Ionise(x, juditha))\nforall x (Endogamic(x) -> Ionise(x, rycca))\nforall x (Ionise(x, juditha) and Ionise(juditha, morganica) -> Endogamic(juditha))\nnot Ionise(rycca, juditha) -> Congest(rycca, morganica)\nCongest(rycca, morganica) -> Congest(rycca, juditha)\n\nCongest(rycca, juditha)\n\ntherefore Congest(rycca, juditha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The vivyanne does not eat the dario. The vivyanne is gentle. The vivyanne bunco the dario. The vivyanne thresh the dario. The vivyanne thresh the randee. The dario chandelle the vivyanne. The dario chandelle the randee. The dario is birchen. The dario is gentle. The dario is plus. The dario bunco the randee. The randee chandelle the dario. The randee is birchen. The randee is plus. The randee thresh the vivyanne. The randee thresh the dario. If the randee thresh the dario and the randee is not marxist then the dario thresh the randee. If someone chandelle the dario and they are not plus then the dario does not eat the vivyanne. If someone chandelle the vivyanne and the vivyanne is plus then the vivyanne is not ceruminous. If someone chandelle the vivyanne then they eat the randee. If someone is ceruminous then they eat the vivyanne. If someone chandelle the randee and the randee chandelle the dario then the randee is ceruminous. If the vivyanne does not eat the randee then the vivyanne thresh the dario. If the vivyanne thresh the dario then the vivyanne thresh the randee. The dario is not birchen.", "logic": "\nnot Chandelle(vivyanne, dario)\nGentle(vivyanne)\nBunco(vivyanne, dario)\nThresh(vivyanne, dario)\nThresh(vivyanne, randee)\nChandelle(dario, vivyanne)\nChandelle(dario, randee)\nBirchen(dario)\nGentle(dario)\nPlus(dario)\nBunco(dario, randee)\nChandelle(randee, dario)\nBirchen(randee)\nPlus(randee)\nThresh(randee, vivyanne)\nThresh(randee, dario)\nThresh(randee, dario) and not Marxist(randee) -> Thresh(dario, randee)\nforall x (Chandelle(x, dario) and not Plus(x) -> not Chandelle(dario, vivyanne))\nforall x (Chandelle(x, vivyanne) and Plus(vivyanne) -> not Ceruminous(vivyanne))\nforall x (Chandelle(x, vivyanne) -> Chandelle(x, randee))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Chandelle(x, vivyanne))\nforall x (Chandelle(x, randee) and Chandelle(randee, dario) -> Ceruminous(randee))\nnot Chandelle(vivyanne, randee) -> Thresh(vivyanne, dario)\nThresh(vivyanne, dario) -> Thresh(vivyanne, randee)\n\nnot Birchen(dario)\n\ntherefore Birchen(dario)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The arabela does not eat the tobin. The arabela is carnassial. The arabela dock the tobin. The arabela socialise the tobin. The arabela socialise the benn. The tobin throne the arabela. The tobin throne the benn. The tobin is shameless. The tobin is carnassial. The tobin is ordered. The tobin dock the benn. The benn throne the tobin. The benn is shameless. The benn is ordered. The benn socialise the arabela. The benn socialise the tobin. If the benn socialise the tobin and the benn is not phlegmatic then the tobin socialise the benn. If someone throne the tobin and they are not ordered then the tobin does not eat the arabela. If someone throne the arabela and the arabela is ordered then the arabela is not curvy. If someone throne the arabela then they eat the benn. If someone is curvy then they eat the arabela. If someone throne the benn and the benn throne the tobin then the benn is curvy. If the arabela does not eat the benn then the arabela socialise the tobin. If the arabela socialise the tobin then the arabela socialise the benn. The benn is curvy.", "logic": "\nnot Throne(arabela, tobin)\nCarnassial(arabela)\nDock(arabela, tobin)\nSocialise(arabela, tobin)\nSocialise(arabela, benn)\nThrone(tobin, arabela)\nThrone(tobin, benn)\nShameless(tobin)\nCarnassial(tobin)\nOrdered(tobin)\nDock(tobin, benn)\nThrone(benn, tobin)\nShameless(benn)\nOrdered(benn)\nSocialise(benn, arabela)\nSocialise(benn, tobin)\nSocialise(benn, tobin) and not Phlegmatic(benn) -> Socialise(tobin, benn)\nforall x (Throne(x, tobin) and not Ordered(x) -> not Throne(tobin, arabela))\nforall x (Throne(x, arabela) and Ordered(arabela) -> not Curvy(arabela))\nforall x (Throne(x, arabela) -> Throne(x, benn))\nforall x (Curvy(x) -> Throne(x, arabela))\nforall x (Throne(x, benn) and Throne(benn, tobin) -> Curvy(benn))\nnot Throne(arabela, benn) -> Socialise(arabela, tobin)\nSocialise(arabela, tobin) -> Socialise(arabela, benn)\n\nCurvy(benn)\n\nThrone(tobin, benn) and Throne(benn, tobin) and forall x (Throne(x, benn) and Throne(benn, tobin) -> Curvy(benn)) -> therefore Curvy(benn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The herby does not eat the rusty. The herby is skimmed. The herby travel the rusty. The herby reassure the rusty. The herby reassure the elladine. The rusty begrudge the herby. The rusty begrudge the elladine. The rusty is labiate. The rusty is skimmed. The rusty is acerose. The rusty travel the elladine. The elladine begrudge the rusty. The elladine is labiate. The elladine is acerose. The elladine reassure the herby. The elladine reassure the rusty. If the elladine reassure the rusty and the elladine is not bruneian then the rusty reassure the elladine. If someone begrudge the rusty and they are not acerose then the rusty does not eat the herby. If someone begrudge the herby and the herby is acerose then the herby is not laurelled. If someone begrudge the herby then they eat the elladine. If someone is laurelled then they eat the herby. If someone begrudge the elladine and the elladine begrudge the rusty then the elladine is laurelled. If the herby does not eat the elladine then the herby reassure the rusty. If the herby reassure the rusty then the herby reassure the elladine. The elladine is not laurelled.", "logic": "\nnot Begrudge(herby, rusty)\nSkimmed(herby)\nTravel(herby, rusty)\nReassure(herby, rusty)\nReassure(herby, elladine)\nBegrudge(rusty, herby)\nBegrudge(rusty, elladine)\nLabiate(rusty)\nSkimmed(rusty)\nAcerose(rusty)\nTravel(rusty, elladine)\nBegrudge(elladine, rusty)\nLabiate(elladine)\nAcerose(elladine)\nReassure(elladine, herby)\nReassure(elladine, rusty)\nReassure(elladine, rusty) and not Bruneian(elladine) -> Reassure(rusty, elladine)\nforall x (Begrudge(x, rusty) and not Acerose(x) -> not Begrudge(rusty, herby))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, herby) and Acerose(herby) -> not Laurelled(herby))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, herby) -> Begrudge(x, elladine))\nforall x (Laurelled(x) -> Begrudge(x, herby))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, elladine) and Begrudge(elladine, rusty) -> Laurelled(elladine))\nnot Begrudge(herby, elladine) -> Reassure(herby, rusty)\nReassure(herby, rusty) -> Reassure(herby, elladine)\n\nnot Laurelled(elladine)\n\nBegrudge(rusty, elladine) and Begrudge(elladine, rusty) and forall x (Begrudge(x, elladine) and Begrudge(elladine, rusty) -> Laurelled(elladine)) -> therefore Laurelled(elladine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The lorilyn does not eat the freemon. The lorilyn is gassy. The lorilyn attire the freemon. The lorilyn position the freemon. The lorilyn position the patti. The freemon vitalize the lorilyn. The freemon vitalize the patti. The freemon is neuter. The freemon is gassy. The freemon is steaming. The freemon attire the patti. The patti vitalize the freemon. The patti is neuter. The patti is steaming. The patti position the lorilyn. The patti position the freemon. If the patti position the freemon and the patti is not detergent then the freemon position the patti. If someone vitalize the freemon and they are not steaming then the freemon does not eat the lorilyn. If someone vitalize the lorilyn and the lorilyn is steaming then the lorilyn is not piffling. If someone vitalize the lorilyn then they eat the patti. If someone is piffling then they eat the lorilyn. If someone vitalize the patti and the patti vitalize the freemon then the patti is piffling. If the lorilyn does not eat the patti then the lorilyn position the freemon. If the lorilyn position the freemon then the lorilyn position the patti. The patti vitalize the lorilyn.", "logic": "\nnot Vitalize(lorilyn, freemon)\nGassy(lorilyn)\nAttire(lorilyn, freemon)\nPosition(lorilyn, freemon)\nPosition(lorilyn, patti)\nVitalize(freemon, lorilyn)\nVitalize(freemon, patti)\nNeuter(freemon)\nGassy(freemon)\nSteaming(freemon)\nAttire(freemon, patti)\nVitalize(patti, freemon)\nNeuter(patti)\nSteaming(patti)\nPosition(patti, lorilyn)\nPosition(patti, freemon)\nPosition(patti, freemon) and not Detergent(patti) -> Position(freemon, patti)\nforall x (Vitalize(x, freemon) and not Steaming(x) -> not Vitalize(freemon, lorilyn))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, lorilyn) and Steaming(lorilyn) -> not Piffling(lorilyn))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, lorilyn) -> Vitalize(x, patti))\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> Vitalize(x, lorilyn))\nforall x (Vitalize(x, patti) and Vitalize(patti, freemon) -> Piffling(patti))\nnot Vitalize(lorilyn, patti) -> Position(lorilyn, freemon)\nPosition(lorilyn, freemon) -> Position(lorilyn, patti)\n\nVitalize(patti, lorilyn)\n\nVitalize(freemon, patti) and Vitalize(patti, freemon) and forall x (Vitalize(x, patti) and Vitalize(patti, freemon) -> Piffling(patti)) -> therefore Piffling(patti) Piffling(patti) and forall x (Piffling(x) -> Vitalize(x, lorilyn)) -> therefore Vitalize(patti, lorilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The willamina does not eat the buffy. The willamina is reasonable. The willamina imprecate the buffy. The willamina dragoon the buffy. The willamina dragoon the raychel. The buffy befit the willamina. The buffy befit the raychel. The buffy is crapulous. The buffy is reasonable. The buffy is melted. The buffy imprecate the raychel. The raychel befit the buffy. The raychel is crapulous. The raychel is melted. The raychel dragoon the willamina. The raychel dragoon the buffy. If the raychel dragoon the buffy and the raychel is not illicit then the buffy dragoon the raychel. If someone befit the buffy and they are not melted then the buffy does not eat the willamina. If someone befit the willamina and the willamina is melted then the willamina is not mutagenic. If someone befit the willamina then they eat the raychel. If someone is mutagenic then they eat the willamina. If someone befit the raychel and the raychel befit the buffy then the raychel is mutagenic. If the willamina does not eat the raychel then the willamina dragoon the buffy. If the willamina dragoon the buffy then the willamina dragoon the raychel. The raychel does not eat the willamina.", "logic": "\nnot Befit(willamina, buffy)\nReasonable(willamina)\nImprecate(willamina, buffy)\nDragoon(willamina, buffy)\nDragoon(willamina, raychel)\nBefit(buffy, willamina)\nBefit(buffy, raychel)\nCrapulous(buffy)\nReasonable(buffy)\nMelted(buffy)\nImprecate(buffy, raychel)\nBefit(raychel, buffy)\nCrapulous(raychel)\nMelted(raychel)\nDragoon(raychel, willamina)\nDragoon(raychel, buffy)\nDragoon(raychel, buffy) and not Illicit(raychel) -> Dragoon(buffy, raychel)\nforall x (Befit(x, buffy) and not Melted(x) -> not Befit(buffy, willamina))\nforall x (Befit(x, willamina) and Melted(willamina) -> not Mutagenic(willamina))\nforall x (Befit(x, willamina) -> Befit(x, raychel))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Befit(x, willamina))\nforall x (Befit(x, raychel) and Befit(raychel, buffy) -> Mutagenic(raychel))\nnot Befit(willamina, raychel) -> Dragoon(willamina, buffy)\nDragoon(willamina, buffy) -> Dragoon(willamina, raychel)\n\nnot Befit(raychel, willamina)\n\nBefit(buffy, raychel) and Befit(raychel, buffy) and forall x (Befit(x, raychel) and Befit(raychel, buffy) -> Mutagenic(raychel)) -> therefore Mutagenic(raychel) Mutagenic(raychel) and forall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Befit(x, willamina)) -> therefore Befit(raychel, willamina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The ingemar does not eat the ebonee. The ingemar is meshugga. The ingemar factorize the ebonee. The ingemar abridge the ebonee. The ingemar abridge the aurea. The ebonee blate the ingemar. The ebonee blate the aurea. The ebonee is foreboding. The ebonee is meshugga. The ebonee is eighteen. The ebonee factorize the aurea. The aurea blate the ebonee. The aurea is foreboding. The aurea is eighteen. The aurea abridge the ingemar. The aurea abridge the ebonee. If the aurea abridge the ebonee and the aurea is not ugly then the ebonee abridge the aurea. If someone blate the ebonee and they are not eighteen then the ebonee does not eat the ingemar. If someone blate the ingemar and the ingemar is eighteen then the ingemar is not newborn. If someone blate the ingemar then they eat the aurea. If someone is newborn then they eat the ingemar. If someone blate the aurea and the aurea blate the ebonee then the aurea is newborn. If the ingemar does not eat the aurea then the ingemar abridge the ebonee. If the ingemar abridge the ebonee then the ingemar abridge the aurea. The aurea blate the aurea.", "logic": "\nnot Blate(ingemar, ebonee)\nMeshugga(ingemar)\nFactorize(ingemar, ebonee)\nAbridge(ingemar, ebonee)\nAbridge(ingemar, aurea)\nBlate(ebonee, ingemar)\nBlate(ebonee, aurea)\nForeboding(ebonee)\nMeshugga(ebonee)\nEighteen(ebonee)\nFactorize(ebonee, aurea)\nBlate(aurea, ebonee)\nForeboding(aurea)\nEighteen(aurea)\nAbridge(aurea, ingemar)\nAbridge(aurea, ebonee)\nAbridge(aurea, ebonee) and not Ugly(aurea) -> Abridge(ebonee, aurea)\nforall x (Blate(x, ebonee) and not Eighteen(x) -> not Blate(ebonee, ingemar))\nforall x (Blate(x, ingemar) and Eighteen(ingemar) -> not Newborn(ingemar))\nforall x (Blate(x, ingemar) -> Blate(x, aurea))\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Blate(x, ingemar))\nforall x (Blate(x, aurea) and Blate(aurea, ebonee) -> Newborn(aurea))\nnot Blate(ingemar, aurea) -> Abridge(ingemar, ebonee)\nAbridge(ingemar, ebonee) -> Abridge(ingemar, aurea)\n\nBlate(aurea, aurea)\n\nBlate(ebonee, aurea) and Blate(aurea, ebonee) and forall x (Blate(x, aurea) and Blate(aurea, ebonee) -> Newborn(aurea)) -> therefore Newborn(aurea) Newborn(aurea) and forall x (Newborn(x) -> Blate(x, ingemar)) -> therefore Blate(aurea, ingemar) Blate(aurea, ingemar) and forall x (Blate(x, ingemar) -> Blate(x, aurea)) -> therefore Blate(aurea, aurea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The ivie does not eat the dwaine. The ivie is residuary. The ivie harken the dwaine. The ivie allegorise the dwaine. The ivie allegorise the wesley. The dwaine desalinize the ivie. The dwaine desalinize the wesley. The dwaine is photogenic. The dwaine is residuary. The dwaine is shiftless. The dwaine harken the wesley. The wesley desalinize the dwaine. The wesley is photogenic. The wesley is shiftless. The wesley allegorise the ivie. The wesley allegorise the dwaine. If the wesley allegorise the dwaine and the wesley is not timbered then the dwaine allegorise the wesley. If someone desalinize the dwaine and they are not shiftless then the dwaine does not eat the ivie. If someone desalinize the ivie and the ivie is shiftless then the ivie is not exceeding. If someone desalinize the ivie then they eat the wesley. If someone is exceeding then they eat the ivie. If someone desalinize the wesley and the wesley desalinize the dwaine then the wesley is exceeding. If the ivie does not eat the wesley then the ivie allegorise the dwaine. If the ivie allegorise the dwaine then the ivie allegorise the wesley. The wesley does not eat the wesley.", "logic": "\nnot Desalinize(ivie, dwaine)\nResiduary(ivie)\nHarken(ivie, dwaine)\nAllegorise(ivie, dwaine)\nAllegorise(ivie, wesley)\nDesalinize(dwaine, ivie)\nDesalinize(dwaine, wesley)\nPhotogenic(dwaine)\nResiduary(dwaine)\nShiftless(dwaine)\nHarken(dwaine, wesley)\nDesalinize(wesley, dwaine)\nPhotogenic(wesley)\nShiftless(wesley)\nAllegorise(wesley, ivie)\nAllegorise(wesley, dwaine)\nAllegorise(wesley, dwaine) and not Timbered(wesley) -> Allegorise(dwaine, wesley)\nforall x (Desalinize(x, dwaine) and not Shiftless(x) -> not Desalinize(dwaine, ivie))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, ivie) and Shiftless(ivie) -> not Exceeding(ivie))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, ivie) -> Desalinize(x, wesley))\nforall x (Exceeding(x) -> Desalinize(x, ivie))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, wesley) and Desalinize(wesley, dwaine) -> Exceeding(wesley))\nnot Desalinize(ivie, wesley) -> Allegorise(ivie, dwaine)\nAllegorise(ivie, dwaine) -> Allegorise(ivie, wesley)\n\nnot Desalinize(wesley, wesley)\n\nDesalinize(dwaine, wesley) and Desalinize(wesley, dwaine) and forall x (Desalinize(x, wesley) and Desalinize(wesley, dwaine) -> Exceeding(wesley)) -> therefore Exceeding(wesley) Exceeding(wesley) and forall x (Exceeding(x) -> Desalinize(x, ivie)) -> therefore Desalinize(wesley, ivie) Desalinize(wesley, ivie) and forall x (Desalinize(x, ivie) -> Desalinize(x, wesley)) -> therefore Desalinize(wesley, wesley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The magda does not eat the sanson. The magda is unlovely. The magda superpose the sanson. The magda buss the sanson. The magda buss the eloisa. The sanson formalise the magda. The sanson formalise the eloisa. The sanson is lanky. The sanson is unlovely. The sanson is talkative. The sanson superpose the eloisa. The eloisa formalise the sanson. The eloisa is lanky. The eloisa is talkative. The eloisa buss the magda. The eloisa buss the sanson. If the eloisa buss the sanson and the eloisa is not repellent then the sanson buss the eloisa. If someone formalise the sanson and they are not talkative then the sanson does not eat the magda. If someone formalise the magda and the magda is talkative then the magda is not untamed. If someone formalise the magda then they eat the eloisa. If someone is untamed then they eat the magda. If someone formalise the eloisa and the eloisa formalise the sanson then the eloisa is untamed. If the magda does not eat the eloisa then the magda buss the sanson. If the magda buss the sanson then the magda buss the eloisa. The magda does not eat the magda.", "logic": "\nnot Formalise(magda, sanson)\nUnlovely(magda)\nSuperpose(magda, sanson)\nBuss(magda, sanson)\nBuss(magda, eloisa)\nFormalise(sanson, magda)\nFormalise(sanson, eloisa)\nLanky(sanson)\nUnlovely(sanson)\nTalkative(sanson)\nSuperpose(sanson, eloisa)\nFormalise(eloisa, sanson)\nLanky(eloisa)\nTalkative(eloisa)\nBuss(eloisa, magda)\nBuss(eloisa, sanson)\nBuss(eloisa, sanson) and not Repellent(eloisa) -> Buss(sanson, eloisa)\nforall x (Formalise(x, sanson) and not Talkative(x) -> not Formalise(sanson, magda))\nforall x (Formalise(x, magda) and Talkative(magda) -> not Untamed(magda))\nforall x (Formalise(x, magda) -> Formalise(x, eloisa))\nforall x (Untamed(x) -> Formalise(x, magda))\nforall x (Formalise(x, eloisa) and Formalise(eloisa, sanson) -> Untamed(eloisa))\nnot Formalise(magda, eloisa) -> Buss(magda, sanson)\nBuss(magda, sanson) -> Buss(magda, eloisa)\n\nnot Formalise(magda, magda)\n\nforall x (Untamed(x) -> Formalise(x, magda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The cletus does not eat the julietta. The cletus is axiomatic. The cletus gild the julietta. The cletus extort the julietta. The cletus extort the carolynn. The julietta trounce the cletus. The julietta trounce the carolynn. The julietta is insightful. The julietta is axiomatic. The julietta is sleeved. The julietta gild the carolynn. The carolynn trounce the julietta. The carolynn is insightful. The carolynn is sleeved. The carolynn extort the cletus. The carolynn extort the julietta. If the carolynn extort the julietta and the carolynn is not watertight then the julietta extort the carolynn. If someone trounce the julietta and they are not sleeved then the julietta does not eat the cletus. If someone trounce the cletus and the cletus is sleeved then the cletus is not sundry. If someone trounce the cletus then they eat the carolynn. If someone is sundry then they eat the cletus. If someone trounce the carolynn and the carolynn trounce the julietta then the carolynn is sundry. If the cletus does not eat the carolynn then the cletus extort the julietta. If the cletus extort the julietta then the cletus extort the carolynn. The cletus trounce the carolynn.", "logic": "\nnot Trounce(cletus, julietta)\nAxiomatic(cletus)\nGild(cletus, julietta)\nExtort(cletus, julietta)\nExtort(cletus, carolynn)\nTrounce(julietta, cletus)\nTrounce(julietta, carolynn)\nInsightful(julietta)\nAxiomatic(julietta)\nSleeved(julietta)\nGild(julietta, carolynn)\nTrounce(carolynn, julietta)\nInsightful(carolynn)\nSleeved(carolynn)\nExtort(carolynn, cletus)\nExtort(carolynn, julietta)\nExtort(carolynn, julietta) and not Watertight(carolynn) -> Extort(julietta, carolynn)\nforall x (Trounce(x, julietta) and not Sleeved(x) -> not Trounce(julietta, cletus))\nforall x (Trounce(x, cletus) and Sleeved(cletus) -> not Sundry(cletus))\nforall x (Trounce(x, cletus) -> Trounce(x, carolynn))\nforall x (Sundry(x) -> Trounce(x, cletus))\nforall x (Trounce(x, carolynn) and Trounce(carolynn, julietta) -> Sundry(carolynn))\nnot Trounce(cletus, carolynn) -> Extort(cletus, julietta)\nExtort(cletus, julietta) -> Extort(cletus, carolynn)\n\nTrounce(cletus, carolynn)\n\nforall x (Trounce(x, cletus) -> Trounce(x, carolynn)) <- forall x (Sundry(x) -> Trounce(x, cletus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The kathie does not eat the fonzie. The kathie is crossed. The kathie ozonise the fonzie. The kathie underspend the fonzie. The kathie underspend the willdon. The fonzie alkalise the kathie. The fonzie alkalise the willdon. The fonzie is bicolor. The fonzie is crossed. The fonzie is enlivening. The fonzie ozonise the willdon. The willdon alkalise the fonzie. The willdon is bicolor. The willdon is enlivening. The willdon underspend the kathie. The willdon underspend the fonzie. If the willdon underspend the fonzie and the willdon is not slanderous then the fonzie underspend the willdon. If someone alkalise the fonzie and they are not enlivening then the fonzie does not eat the kathie. If someone alkalise the kathie and the kathie is enlivening then the kathie is not inst. If someone alkalise the kathie then they eat the willdon. If someone is inst then they eat the kathie. If someone alkalise the willdon and the willdon alkalise the fonzie then the willdon is inst. If the kathie does not eat the willdon then the kathie underspend the fonzie. If the kathie underspend the fonzie then the kathie underspend the willdon. The fonzie does not need the willdon.", "logic": "\nnot Alkalise(kathie, fonzie)\nCrossed(kathie)\nOzonise(kathie, fonzie)\nUnderspend(kathie, fonzie)\nUnderspend(kathie, willdon)\nAlkalise(fonzie, kathie)\nAlkalise(fonzie, willdon)\nBicolor(fonzie)\nCrossed(fonzie)\nEnlivening(fonzie)\nOzonise(fonzie, willdon)\nAlkalise(willdon, fonzie)\nBicolor(willdon)\nEnlivening(willdon)\nUnderspend(willdon, kathie)\nUnderspend(willdon, fonzie)\nUnderspend(willdon, fonzie) and not Slanderous(willdon) -> Underspend(fonzie, willdon)\nforall x (Alkalise(x, fonzie) and not Enlivening(x) -> not Alkalise(fonzie, kathie))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, kathie) and Enlivening(kathie) -> not Inst(kathie))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, kathie) -> Alkalise(x, willdon))\nforall x (Inst(x) -> Alkalise(x, kathie))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, willdon) and Alkalise(willdon, fonzie) -> Inst(willdon))\nnot Alkalise(kathie, willdon) -> Underspend(kathie, fonzie)\nUnderspend(kathie, fonzie) -> Underspend(kathie, willdon)\n\nnot Underspend(fonzie, willdon)\n\nUnderspend(willdon, fonzie) and not Slanderous(willdon) -> Underspend(fonzie, willdon) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The mohamad does not eat the jeremias. The mohamad is cytolytic. The mohamad thrill the jeremias. The mohamad gloat the jeremias. The mohamad gloat the stanislaw. The jeremias gore the mohamad. The jeremias gore the stanislaw. The jeremias is murdered. The jeremias is cytolytic. The jeremias is infrequent. The jeremias thrill the stanislaw. The stanislaw gore the jeremias. The stanislaw is murdered. The stanislaw is infrequent. The stanislaw gloat the mohamad. The stanislaw gloat the jeremias. If the stanislaw gloat the jeremias and the stanislaw is not descending then the jeremias gloat the stanislaw. If someone gore the jeremias and they are not infrequent then the jeremias does not eat the mohamad. If someone gore the mohamad and the mohamad is infrequent then the mohamad is not unliterary. If someone gore the mohamad then they eat the stanislaw. If someone is unliterary then they eat the mohamad. If someone gore the stanislaw and the stanislaw gore the jeremias then the stanislaw is unliterary. If the mohamad does not eat the stanislaw then the mohamad gloat the jeremias. If the mohamad gloat the jeremias then the mohamad gloat the stanislaw. The jeremias gloat the mohamad.", "logic": "\nnot Gore(mohamad, jeremias)\nCytolytic(mohamad)\nThrill(mohamad, jeremias)\nGloat(mohamad, jeremias)\nGloat(mohamad, stanislaw)\nGore(jeremias, mohamad)\nGore(jeremias, stanislaw)\nMurdered(jeremias)\nCytolytic(jeremias)\nInfrequent(jeremias)\nThrill(jeremias, stanislaw)\nGore(stanislaw, jeremias)\nMurdered(stanislaw)\nInfrequent(stanislaw)\nGloat(stanislaw, mohamad)\nGloat(stanislaw, jeremias)\nGloat(stanislaw, jeremias) and not Descending(stanislaw) -> Gloat(jeremias, stanislaw)\nforall x (Gore(x, jeremias) and not Infrequent(x) -> not Gore(jeremias, mohamad))\nforall x (Gore(x, mohamad) and Infrequent(mohamad) -> not Unliterary(mohamad))\nforall x (Gore(x, mohamad) -> Gore(x, stanislaw))\nforall x (Unliterary(x) -> Gore(x, mohamad))\nforall x (Gore(x, stanislaw) and Gore(stanislaw, jeremias) -> Unliterary(stanislaw))\nnot Gore(mohamad, stanislaw) -> Gloat(mohamad, jeremias)\nGloat(mohamad, jeremias) -> Gloat(mohamad, stanislaw)\n\nGloat(jeremias, mohamad)\n\nGloat(jeremias, mohamad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The linnie does not eat the marsh. The linnie is orthogonal. The linnie blackjack the marsh. The linnie putrefy the marsh. The linnie putrefy the cassandry. The marsh ratify the linnie. The marsh ratify the cassandry. The marsh is cruciate. The marsh is orthogonal. The marsh is hunched. The marsh blackjack the cassandry. The cassandry ratify the marsh. The cassandry is cruciate. The cassandry is hunched. The cassandry putrefy the linnie. The cassandry putrefy the marsh. If the cassandry putrefy the marsh and the cassandry is not xiii then the marsh putrefy the cassandry. If someone ratify the marsh and they are not hunched then the marsh does not eat the linnie. If someone ratify the linnie and the linnie is hunched then the linnie is not taken. If someone ratify the linnie then they eat the cassandry. If someone is taken then they eat the linnie. If someone ratify the cassandry and the cassandry ratify the marsh then the cassandry is taken. If the linnie does not eat the cassandry then the linnie putrefy the marsh. If the linnie putrefy the marsh then the linnie putrefy the cassandry. The linnie is not hunched.", "logic": "\nnot Ratify(linnie, marsh)\nOrthogonal(linnie)\nBlackjack(linnie, marsh)\nPutrefy(linnie, marsh)\nPutrefy(linnie, cassandry)\nRatify(marsh, linnie)\nRatify(marsh, cassandry)\nCruciate(marsh)\nOrthogonal(marsh)\nHunched(marsh)\nBlackjack(marsh, cassandry)\nRatify(cassandry, marsh)\nCruciate(cassandry)\nHunched(cassandry)\nPutrefy(cassandry, linnie)\nPutrefy(cassandry, marsh)\nPutrefy(cassandry, marsh) and not Xiii(cassandry) -> Putrefy(marsh, cassandry)\nforall x (Ratify(x, marsh) and not Hunched(x) -> not Ratify(marsh, linnie))\nforall x (Ratify(x, linnie) and Hunched(linnie) -> not Taken(linnie))\nforall x (Ratify(x, linnie) -> Ratify(x, cassandry))\nforall x (Taken(x) -> Ratify(x, linnie))\nforall x (Ratify(x, cassandry) and Ratify(cassandry, marsh) -> Taken(cassandry))\nnot Ratify(linnie, cassandry) -> Putrefy(linnie, marsh)\nPutrefy(linnie, marsh) -> Putrefy(linnie, cassandry)\n\nnot Hunched(linnie)\n\nnot Hunched(linnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The hercules does not eat the ardith. The hercules is gnarly. The hercules cringe the ardith. The hercules bodge the ardith. The hercules bodge the elliott. The ardith relapse the hercules. The ardith relapse the elliott. The ardith is noisome. The ardith is gnarly. The ardith is wormy. The ardith cringe the elliott. The elliott relapse the ardith. The elliott is noisome. The elliott is wormy. The elliott bodge the hercules. The elliott bodge the ardith. If the elliott bodge the ardith and the elliott is not slapstick then the ardith bodge the elliott. If someone relapse the ardith and they are not wormy then the ardith does not eat the hercules. If someone relapse the hercules and the hercules is wormy then the hercules is not inveterate. If someone relapse the hercules then they eat the elliott. If someone is inveterate then they eat the hercules. If someone relapse the elliott and the elliott relapse the ardith then the elliott is inveterate. If the hercules does not eat the elliott then the hercules bodge the ardith. If the hercules bodge the ardith then the hercules bodge the elliott. The ardith is slapstick.", "logic": "\nnot Relapse(hercules, ardith)\nGnarly(hercules)\nCringe(hercules, ardith)\nBodge(hercules, ardith)\nBodge(hercules, elliott)\nRelapse(ardith, hercules)\nRelapse(ardith, elliott)\nNoisome(ardith)\nGnarly(ardith)\nWormy(ardith)\nCringe(ardith, elliott)\nRelapse(elliott, ardith)\nNoisome(elliott)\nWormy(elliott)\nBodge(elliott, hercules)\nBodge(elliott, ardith)\nBodge(elliott, ardith) and not Slapstick(elliott) -> Bodge(ardith, elliott)\nforall x (Relapse(x, ardith) and not Wormy(x) -> not Relapse(ardith, hercules))\nforall x (Relapse(x, hercules) and Wormy(hercules) -> not Inveterate(hercules))\nforall x (Relapse(x, hercules) -> Relapse(x, elliott))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Relapse(x, hercules))\nforall x (Relapse(x, elliott) and Relapse(elliott, ardith) -> Inveterate(elliott))\nnot Relapse(hercules, elliott) -> Bodge(hercules, ardith)\nBodge(hercules, ardith) -> Bodge(hercules, elliott)\n\nSlapstick(ardith)\n\nSlapstick(ardith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The marna does not eat the meridel. The marna is reflex. The marna advance the meridel. The marna squeal the meridel. The marna squeal the derrick. The meridel dismay the marna. The meridel dismay the derrick. The meridel is czarist. The meridel is reflex. The meridel is cussed. The meridel advance the derrick. The derrick dismay the meridel. The derrick is czarist. The derrick is cussed. The derrick squeal the marna. The derrick squeal the meridel. If the derrick squeal the meridel and the derrick is not suicidal then the meridel squeal the derrick. If someone dismay the meridel and they are not cussed then the meridel does not eat the marna. If someone dismay the marna and the marna is cussed then the marna is not trim. If someone dismay the marna then they eat the derrick. If someone is trim then they eat the marna. If someone dismay the derrick and the derrick dismay the meridel then the derrick is trim. If the marna does not eat the derrick then the marna squeal the meridel. If the marna squeal the meridel then the marna squeal the derrick. The derrick does not like the meridel.", "logic": "\nnot Dismay(marna, meridel)\nReflex(marna)\nAdvance(marna, meridel)\nSqueal(marna, meridel)\nSqueal(marna, derrick)\nDismay(meridel, marna)\nDismay(meridel, derrick)\nCzarist(meridel)\nReflex(meridel)\nCussed(meridel)\nAdvance(meridel, derrick)\nDismay(derrick, meridel)\nCzarist(derrick)\nCussed(derrick)\nSqueal(derrick, marna)\nSqueal(derrick, meridel)\nSqueal(derrick, meridel) and not Suicidal(derrick) -> Squeal(meridel, derrick)\nforall x (Dismay(x, meridel) and not Cussed(x) -> not Dismay(meridel, marna))\nforall x (Dismay(x, marna) and Cussed(marna) -> not Trim(marna))\nforall x (Dismay(x, marna) -> Dismay(x, derrick))\nforall x (Trim(x) -> Dismay(x, marna))\nforall x (Dismay(x, derrick) and Dismay(derrick, meridel) -> Trim(derrick))\nnot Dismay(marna, derrick) -> Squeal(marna, meridel)\nSqueal(marna, meridel) -> Squeal(marna, derrick)\n\nnot Advance(derrick, meridel)\n\nnot Advance(derrick, meridel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "The emmalynne does not eat the thia. The emmalynne is mesodermal. The emmalynne poleax the thia. The emmalynne communise the thia. The emmalynne communise the weidar. The thia demoralize the emmalynne. The thia demoralize the weidar. The thia is tattered. The thia is mesodermal. The thia is armored. The thia poleax the weidar. The weidar demoralize the thia. The weidar is tattered. The weidar is armored. The weidar communise the emmalynne. The weidar communise the thia. If the weidar communise the thia and the weidar is not temporal then the thia communise the weidar. If someone demoralize the thia and they are not armored then the thia does not eat the emmalynne. If someone demoralize the emmalynne and the emmalynne is armored then the emmalynne is not inferior. If someone demoralize the emmalynne then they eat the weidar. If someone is inferior then they eat the emmalynne. If someone demoralize the weidar and the weidar demoralize the thia then the weidar is inferior. If the emmalynne does not eat the weidar then the emmalynne communise the thia. If the emmalynne communise the thia then the emmalynne communise the weidar. The emmalynne is temporal.", "logic": "\nnot Demoralize(emmalynne, thia)\nMesodermal(emmalynne)\nPoleax(emmalynne, thia)\nCommunise(emmalynne, thia)\nCommunise(emmalynne, weidar)\nDemoralize(thia, emmalynne)\nDemoralize(thia, weidar)\nTattered(thia)\nMesodermal(thia)\nArmored(thia)\nPoleax(thia, weidar)\nDemoralize(weidar, thia)\nTattered(weidar)\nArmored(weidar)\nCommunise(weidar, emmalynne)\nCommunise(weidar, thia)\nCommunise(weidar, thia) and not Temporal(weidar) -> Communise(thia, weidar)\nforall x (Demoralize(x, thia) and not Armored(x) -> not Demoralize(thia, emmalynne))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, emmalynne) and Armored(emmalynne) -> not Inferior(emmalynne))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, emmalynne) -> Demoralize(x, weidar))\nforall x (Inferior(x) -> Demoralize(x, emmalynne))\nforall x (Demoralize(x, weidar) and Demoralize(weidar, thia) -> Inferior(weidar))\nnot Demoralize(emmalynne, weidar) -> Communise(emmalynne, thia)\nCommunise(emmalynne, thia) -> Communise(emmalynne, weidar)\n\nTemporal(emmalynne)\n\nTemporal(emmalynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-997"} {"premises": "Rogers is not vagrant. Jesselyn is not chylaceous. Jesselyn is slaveless. Jesselyn is vagrant. Jesselyn is not bilabiate. Nero is awninged. Nero is bilabiate. Richardo is couthie. Richardo is not vagrant. Richardo is bilabiate. Smart people are chylaceous. If someone is chylaceous then they are awninged. If someone is awninged then they are not delible. If Rogers is chylaceous and Rogers is delible then Rogers is slaveless. All delible, awninged people are vagrant. If Jesselyn is chylaceous and Jesselyn is couthie then Jesselyn is slaveless. Smart people are couthie. If someone is bilabiate and not awninged then they are not couthie. Nero is awninged.", "logic": "\nnot Vagrant(rogers)\nnot Chylaceous(jesselyn)\nSlaveless(jesselyn)\nVagrant(jesselyn)\nnot Bilabiate(jesselyn)\nAwninged(nero)\nBilabiate(nero)\nCouthie(richardo)\nnot Vagrant(richardo)\nBilabiate(richardo)\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Chylaceous(x))\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) -> Awninged(x))\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> not Delible(x))\nChylaceous(rogers) and Delible(rogers) -> Slaveless(rogers)\nforall x (Delible(x) and Awninged(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nChylaceous(jesselyn) and Couthie(jesselyn) -> Slaveless(jesselyn)\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Couthie(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) and not Awninged(x) -> not Couthie(x))\n\nAwninged(nero)\n\ntherefore Awninged(nero)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Ashely is not needy. Evania is not puppylike. Evania is chelated. Evania is needy. Evania is not graduate. Bethina is shaded. Bethina is graduate. Bekki is impatient. Bekki is not needy. Bekki is graduate. Smart people are puppylike. If someone is puppylike then they are shaded. If someone is shaded then they are not techy. If Ashely is puppylike and Ashely is techy then Ashely is chelated. All techy, shaded people are needy. If Evania is puppylike and Evania is impatient then Evania is chelated. Smart people are impatient. If someone is graduate and not shaded then they are not impatient. Bethina is not shaded.", "logic": "\nnot Needy(ashely)\nnot Puppylike(evania)\nChelated(evania)\nNeedy(evania)\nnot Graduate(evania)\nShaded(bethina)\nGraduate(bethina)\nImpatient(bekki)\nnot Needy(bekki)\nGraduate(bekki)\nforall x (Graduate(x) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> Shaded(x))\nforall x (Shaded(x) -> not Techy(x))\nPuppylike(ashely) and Techy(ashely) -> Chelated(ashely)\nforall x (Techy(x) and Shaded(x) -> Needy(x))\nPuppylike(evania) and Impatient(evania) -> Chelated(evania)\nforall x (Graduate(x) -> Impatient(x))\nforall x (Graduate(x) and not Shaded(x) -> not Impatient(x))\n\nnot Shaded(bethina)\n\ntherefore Shaded(bethina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Chrystel is not charnel. Romona is not embroiled. Romona is intangible. Romona is charnel. Romona is not balding. Morgana is frontal. Morgana is balding. Halette is intruding. Halette is not charnel. Halette is balding. Smart people are embroiled. If someone is embroiled then they are frontal. If someone is frontal then they are not bally. If Chrystel is embroiled and Chrystel is bally then Chrystel is intangible. All bally, frontal people are charnel. If Romona is embroiled and Romona is intruding then Romona is intangible. Smart people are intruding. If someone is balding and not frontal then they are not intruding. Morgana is intruding.", "logic": "\nnot Charnel(chrystel)\nnot Embroiled(romona)\nIntangible(romona)\nCharnel(romona)\nnot Balding(romona)\nFrontal(morgana)\nBalding(morgana)\nIntruding(halette)\nnot Charnel(halette)\nBalding(halette)\nforall x (Balding(x) -> Embroiled(x))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) -> Frontal(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> not Bally(x))\nEmbroiled(chrystel) and Bally(chrystel) -> Intangible(chrystel)\nforall x (Bally(x) and Frontal(x) -> Charnel(x))\nEmbroiled(romona) and Intruding(romona) -> Intangible(romona)\nforall x (Balding(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Balding(x) and not Frontal(x) -> not Intruding(x))\n\nIntruding(morgana)\n\nBalding(morgana) and forall x (Balding(x) -> Intruding(x)) -> therefore Intruding(morgana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Cassondra is not barbellate. Jock is not histologic. Jock is endogamic. Jock is barbellate. Jock is not dowered. Valene is sculptured. Valene is dowered. Maurita is jesuit. Maurita is not barbellate. Maurita is dowered. Smart people are histologic. If someone is histologic then they are sculptured. If someone is sculptured then they are not wagnerian. If Cassondra is histologic and Cassondra is wagnerian then Cassondra is endogamic. All wagnerian, sculptured people are barbellate. If Jock is histologic and Jock is jesuit then Jock is endogamic. Smart people are jesuit. If someone is dowered and not sculptured then they are not jesuit. Valene is wagnerian.", "logic": "\nnot Barbellate(cassondra)\nnot Histologic(jock)\nEndogamic(jock)\nBarbellate(jock)\nnot Dowered(jock)\nSculptured(valene)\nDowered(valene)\nJesuit(maurita)\nnot Barbellate(maurita)\nDowered(maurita)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Histologic(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) -> not Wagnerian(x))\nHistologic(cassondra) and Wagnerian(cassondra) -> Endogamic(cassondra)\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) and Sculptured(x) -> Barbellate(x))\nHistologic(jock) and Jesuit(jock) -> Endogamic(jock)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) and not Sculptured(x) -> not Jesuit(x))\n\nWagnerian(valene)\n\nSculptured(valene) and forall x (Sculptured(x) -> not Wagnerian(x)) -> therefore not Wagnerian(valene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Ulla is not aboveboard. Dory is not mature. Dory is singable. Dory is aboveboard. Dory is not dull. Camellia is waxlike. Camellia is dull. Meredithe is calvinist. Meredithe is not aboveboard. Meredithe is dull. Smart people are mature. If someone is mature then they are waxlike. If someone is waxlike then they are not papistic. If Ulla is mature and Ulla is papistic then Ulla is singable. All papistic, waxlike people are aboveboard. If Dory is mature and Dory is calvinist then Dory is singable. Smart people are calvinist. If someone is dull and not waxlike then they are not calvinist. Meredithe is waxlike.", "logic": "\nnot Aboveboard(ulla)\nnot Mature(dory)\nSingable(dory)\nAboveboard(dory)\nnot Dull(dory)\nWaxlike(camellia)\nDull(camellia)\nCalvinist(meredithe)\nnot Aboveboard(meredithe)\nDull(meredithe)\nforall x (Dull(x) -> Mature(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) -> Waxlike(x))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) -> not Papistic(x))\nMature(ulla) and Papistic(ulla) -> Singable(ulla)\nforall x (Papistic(x) and Waxlike(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nMature(dory) and Calvinist(dory) -> Singable(dory)\nforall x (Dull(x) -> Calvinist(x))\nforall x (Dull(x) and not Waxlike(x) -> not Calvinist(x))\n\nWaxlike(meredithe)\n\nDull(meredithe) and forall x (Dull(x) -> Mature(x)) -> therefore Mature(meredithe) Mature(meredithe) and forall x (Mature(x) -> Waxlike(x)) -> therefore Waxlike(meredithe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Kissee is not divorced. Madlin is not baritone. Madlin is delusive. Madlin is divorced. Madlin is not uncomplete. Darwin is plumbable. Darwin is uncomplete. Goober is swimming. Goober is not divorced. Goober is uncomplete. Smart people are baritone. If someone is baritone then they are plumbable. If someone is plumbable then they are not flecked. If Kissee is baritone and Kissee is flecked then Kissee is delusive. All flecked, plumbable people are divorced. If Madlin is baritone and Madlin is swimming then Madlin is delusive. Smart people are swimming. If someone is uncomplete and not plumbable then they are not swimming. Goober is not plumbable.", "logic": "\nnot Divorced(kissee)\nnot Baritone(madlin)\nDelusive(madlin)\nDivorced(madlin)\nnot Uncomplete(madlin)\nPlumbable(darwin)\nUncomplete(darwin)\nSwimming(goober)\nnot Divorced(goober)\nUncomplete(goober)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Baritone(x))\nforall x (Baritone(x) -> Plumbable(x))\nforall x (Plumbable(x) -> not Flecked(x))\nBaritone(kissee) and Flecked(kissee) -> Delusive(kissee)\nforall x (Flecked(x) and Plumbable(x) -> Divorced(x))\nBaritone(madlin) and Swimming(madlin) -> Delusive(madlin)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Swimming(x))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and not Plumbable(x) -> not Swimming(x))\n\nnot Plumbable(goober)\n\nUncomplete(goober) and forall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Baritone(x)) -> therefore Baritone(goober) Baritone(goober) and forall x (Baritone(x) -> Plumbable(x)) -> therefore Plumbable(goober)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Worth is not dumpy. Ailene is not ransacked. Ailene is oaken. Ailene is dumpy. Ailene is not unrentable. Fran is skillful. Fran is unrentable. Nathalia is pinnate. Nathalia is not dumpy. Nathalia is unrentable. Smart people are ransacked. If someone is ransacked then they are skillful. If someone is skillful then they are not uncurbed. If Worth is ransacked and Worth is uncurbed then Worth is oaken. All uncurbed, skillful people are dumpy. If Ailene is ransacked and Ailene is pinnate then Ailene is oaken. Smart people are pinnate. If someone is unrentable and not skillful then they are not pinnate. Nathalia is not uncurbed.", "logic": "\nnot Dumpy(worth)\nnot Ransacked(ailene)\nOaken(ailene)\nDumpy(ailene)\nnot Unrentable(ailene)\nSkillful(fran)\nUnrentable(fran)\nPinnate(nathalia)\nnot Dumpy(nathalia)\nUnrentable(nathalia)\nforall x (Unrentable(x) -> Ransacked(x))\nforall x (Ransacked(x) -> Skillful(x))\nforall x (Skillful(x) -> not Uncurbed(x))\nRansacked(worth) and Uncurbed(worth) -> Oaken(worth)\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) and Skillful(x) -> Dumpy(x))\nRansacked(ailene) and Pinnate(ailene) -> Oaken(ailene)\nforall x (Unrentable(x) -> Pinnate(x))\nforall x (Unrentable(x) and not Skillful(x) -> not Pinnate(x))\n\nnot Uncurbed(nathalia)\n\nUnrentable(nathalia) and forall x (Unrentable(x) -> Ransacked(x)) -> therefore Ransacked(nathalia) Ransacked(nathalia) and forall x (Ransacked(x) -> Skillful(x)) -> therefore Skillful(nathalia) Skillful(nathalia) and forall x (Skillful(x) -> not Uncurbed(x)) -> therefore not Uncurbed(nathalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Laverna is not trillionth. Petunia is not mealy. Petunia is iambic. Petunia is trillionth. Petunia is not devout. Joleen is isolating. Joleen is devout. Johnette is dendriform. Johnette is not trillionth. Johnette is devout. Smart people are mealy. If someone is mealy then they are isolating. If someone is isolating then they are not roumanian. If Laverna is mealy and Laverna is roumanian then Laverna is iambic. All roumanian, isolating people are trillionth. If Petunia is mealy and Petunia is dendriform then Petunia is iambic. Smart people are dendriform. If someone is devout and not isolating then they are not dendriform. Johnette is roumanian.", "logic": "\nnot Trillionth(laverna)\nnot Mealy(petunia)\nIambic(petunia)\nTrillionth(petunia)\nnot Devout(petunia)\nIsolating(joleen)\nDevout(joleen)\nDendriform(johnette)\nnot Trillionth(johnette)\nDevout(johnette)\nforall x (Devout(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> Isolating(x))\nforall x (Isolating(x) -> not Roumanian(x))\nMealy(laverna) and Roumanian(laverna) -> Iambic(laverna)\nforall x (Roumanian(x) and Isolating(x) -> Trillionth(x))\nMealy(petunia) and Dendriform(petunia) -> Iambic(petunia)\nforall x (Devout(x) -> Dendriform(x))\nforall x (Devout(x) and not Isolating(x) -> not Dendriform(x))\n\nRoumanian(johnette)\n\nDevout(johnette) and forall x (Devout(x) -> Mealy(x)) -> therefore Mealy(johnette) Mealy(johnette) and forall x (Mealy(x) -> Isolating(x)) -> therefore Isolating(johnette) Isolating(johnette) and forall x (Isolating(x) -> not Roumanian(x)) -> therefore not Roumanian(johnette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Klara is not encircled. Brant is not crispate. Brant is cerebellar. Brant is encircled. Brant is not frilly. Oriana is regulative. Oriana is frilly. Idette is touched. Idette is not encircled. Idette is frilly. Smart people are crispate. If someone is crispate then they are regulative. If someone is regulative then they are not deadly. If Klara is crispate and Klara is deadly then Klara is cerebellar. All deadly, regulative people are encircled. If Brant is crispate and Brant is touched then Brant is cerebellar. Smart people are touched. If someone is frilly and not regulative then they are not touched. Klara is not crispate.", "logic": "\nnot Encircled(klara)\nnot Crispate(brant)\nCerebellar(brant)\nEncircled(brant)\nnot Frilly(brant)\nRegulative(oriana)\nFrilly(oriana)\nTouched(idette)\nnot Encircled(idette)\nFrilly(idette)\nforall x (Frilly(x) -> Crispate(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Regulative(x) -> not Deadly(x))\nCrispate(klara) and Deadly(klara) -> Cerebellar(klara)\nforall x (Deadly(x) and Regulative(x) -> Encircled(x))\nCrispate(brant) and Touched(brant) -> Cerebellar(brant)\nforall x (Frilly(x) -> Touched(x))\nforall x (Frilly(x) and not Regulative(x) -> not Touched(x))\n\nnot Crispate(klara)\n\nforall x (Frilly(x) -> Crispate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Gene is not socratic. Rajeev is not giddy. Rajeev is wagnerian. Rajeev is socratic. Rajeev is not excitatory. Parker is araceous. Parker is excitatory. Gallagher is paternal. Gallagher is not socratic. Gallagher is excitatory. Smart people are giddy. If someone is giddy then they are araceous. If someone is araceous then they are not unhelpful. If Gene is giddy and Gene is unhelpful then Gene is wagnerian. All unhelpful, araceous people are socratic. If Rajeev is giddy and Rajeev is paternal then Rajeev is wagnerian. Smart people are paternal. If someone is excitatory and not araceous then they are not paternal. Gene is paternal.", "logic": "\nnot Socratic(gene)\nnot Giddy(rajeev)\nWagnerian(rajeev)\nSocratic(rajeev)\nnot Excitatory(rajeev)\nAraceous(parker)\nExcitatory(parker)\nPaternal(gallagher)\nnot Socratic(gallagher)\nExcitatory(gallagher)\nforall x (Excitatory(x) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Giddy(x) -> Araceous(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> not Unhelpful(x))\nGiddy(gene) and Unhelpful(gene) -> Wagnerian(gene)\nforall x (Unhelpful(x) and Araceous(x) -> Socratic(x))\nGiddy(rajeev) and Paternal(rajeev) -> Wagnerian(rajeev)\nforall x (Excitatory(x) -> Paternal(x))\nforall x (Excitatory(x) and not Araceous(x) -> not Paternal(x))\n\nPaternal(gene)\n\nforall x (Excitatory(x) -> Paternal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Dickey is not centrist. Carmela is not attached. Carmela is tiptop. Carmela is centrist. Carmela is not isoclinic. Orella is contrasty. Orella is isoclinic. Isobel is cetacean. Isobel is not centrist. Isobel is isoclinic. Smart people are attached. If someone is attached then they are contrasty. If someone is contrasty then they are not seriocomic. If Dickey is attached and Dickey is seriocomic then Dickey is tiptop. All seriocomic, contrasty people are centrist. If Carmela is attached and Carmela is cetacean then Carmela is tiptop. Smart people are cetacean. If someone is isoclinic and not contrasty then they are not cetacean. Carmela is not cetacean.", "logic": "\nnot Centrist(dickey)\nnot Attached(carmela)\nTiptop(carmela)\nCentrist(carmela)\nnot Isoclinic(carmela)\nContrasty(orella)\nIsoclinic(orella)\nCetacean(isobel)\nnot Centrist(isobel)\nIsoclinic(isobel)\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) -> Contrasty(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> not Seriocomic(x))\nAttached(dickey) and Seriocomic(dickey) -> Tiptop(dickey)\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) and Contrasty(x) -> Centrist(x))\nAttached(carmela) and Cetacean(carmela) -> Tiptop(carmela)\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Cetacean(x))\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) and not Contrasty(x) -> not Cetacean(x))\n\nnot Cetacean(carmela)\n\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Cetacean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Ellie is not walleyed. Oswell is not anterior. Oswell is iridaceous. Oswell is walleyed. Oswell is not locomotive. Raynard is devilish. Raynard is locomotive. Sonya is gigantic. Sonya is not walleyed. Sonya is locomotive. Smart people are anterior. If someone is anterior then they are devilish. If someone is devilish then they are not titillated. If Ellie is anterior and Ellie is titillated then Ellie is iridaceous. All titillated, devilish people are walleyed. If Oswell is anterior and Oswell is gigantic then Oswell is iridaceous. Smart people are gigantic. If someone is locomotive and not devilish then they are not gigantic. Ellie is iridaceous.", "logic": "\nnot Walleyed(ellie)\nnot Anterior(oswell)\nIridaceous(oswell)\nWalleyed(oswell)\nnot Locomotive(oswell)\nDevilish(raynard)\nLocomotive(raynard)\nGigantic(sonya)\nnot Walleyed(sonya)\nLocomotive(sonya)\nforall x (Locomotive(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Devilish(x))\nforall x (Devilish(x) -> not Titillated(x))\nAnterior(ellie) and Titillated(ellie) -> Iridaceous(ellie)\nforall x (Titillated(x) and Devilish(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nAnterior(oswell) and Gigantic(oswell) -> Iridaceous(oswell)\nforall x (Locomotive(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Locomotive(x) and not Devilish(x) -> not Gigantic(x))\n\nIridaceous(ellie)\n\nAnterior(ellie) and Titillated(ellie) -> Iridaceous(ellie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Myrtie is not effectual. Ulysses is not fimbriate. Ulysses is immaterial. Ulysses is effectual. Ulysses is not tahitian. Karie is mistakable. Karie is tahitian. Shorty is plantal. Shorty is not effectual. Shorty is tahitian. Smart people are fimbriate. If someone is fimbriate then they are mistakable. If someone is mistakable then they are not insolvable. If Myrtie is fimbriate and Myrtie is insolvable then Myrtie is immaterial. All insolvable, mistakable people are effectual. If Ulysses is fimbriate and Ulysses is plantal then Ulysses is immaterial. Smart people are plantal. If someone is tahitian and not mistakable then they are not plantal. Karie is not immaterial.", "logic": "\nnot Effectual(myrtie)\nnot Fimbriate(ulysses)\nImmaterial(ulysses)\nEffectual(ulysses)\nnot Tahitian(ulysses)\nMistakable(karie)\nTahitian(karie)\nPlantal(shorty)\nnot Effectual(shorty)\nTahitian(shorty)\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> Fimbriate(x))\nforall x (Fimbriate(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) -> not Insolvable(x))\nFimbriate(myrtie) and Insolvable(myrtie) -> Immaterial(myrtie)\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Mistakable(x) -> Effectual(x))\nFimbriate(ulysses) and Plantal(ulysses) -> Immaterial(ulysses)\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> Plantal(x))\nforall x (Tahitian(x) and not Mistakable(x) -> not Plantal(x))\n\nnot Immaterial(karie)\n\nnot Immaterial(karie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Christof is not twisting. Linet is not pilar. Linet is lviii. Linet is twisting. Linet is not starchless. Lindi is anxious. Lindi is starchless. Elicia is apsidal. Elicia is not twisting. Elicia is starchless. Smart people are pilar. If someone is pilar then they are anxious. If someone is anxious then they are not skinny. If Christof is pilar and Christof is skinny then Christof is lviii. All skinny, anxious people are twisting. If Linet is pilar and Linet is apsidal then Linet is lviii. Smart people are apsidal. If someone is starchless and not anxious then they are not apsidal. Christof is starchless.", "logic": "\nnot Twisting(christof)\nnot Pilar(linet)\nLviii(linet)\nTwisting(linet)\nnot Starchless(linet)\nAnxious(lindi)\nStarchless(lindi)\nApsidal(elicia)\nnot Twisting(elicia)\nStarchless(elicia)\nforall x (Starchless(x) -> Pilar(x))\nforall x (Pilar(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> not Skinny(x))\nPilar(christof) and Skinny(christof) -> Lviii(christof)\nforall x (Skinny(x) and Anxious(x) -> Twisting(x))\nPilar(linet) and Apsidal(linet) -> Lviii(linet)\nforall x (Starchless(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Starchless(x) and not Anxious(x) -> not Apsidal(x))\n\nStarchless(christof)\n\nStarchless(christof) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Kerri is not tailored. Brittany is not adenoidal. Brittany is focused. Brittany is tailored. Brittany is not invariable. Annalena is acneiform. Annalena is invariable. Jannel is rentable. Jannel is not tailored. Jannel is invariable. Smart people are adenoidal. If someone is adenoidal then they are acneiform. If someone is acneiform then they are not windburned. If Kerri is adenoidal and Kerri is windburned then Kerri is focused. All windburned, acneiform people are tailored. If Brittany is adenoidal and Brittany is rentable then Brittany is focused. Smart people are rentable. If someone is invariable and not acneiform then they are not rentable. Jannel is not focused.", "logic": "\nnot Tailored(kerri)\nnot Adenoidal(brittany)\nFocused(brittany)\nTailored(brittany)\nnot Invariable(brittany)\nAcneiform(annalena)\nInvariable(annalena)\nRentable(jannel)\nnot Tailored(jannel)\nInvariable(jannel)\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Adenoidal(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Acneiform(x) -> not Windburned(x))\nAdenoidal(kerri) and Windburned(kerri) -> Focused(kerri)\nforall x (Windburned(x) and Acneiform(x) -> Tailored(x))\nAdenoidal(brittany) and Rentable(brittany) -> Focused(brittany)\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Rentable(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) and not Acneiform(x) -> not Rentable(x))\n\nnot Focused(jannel)\n\nnot Focused(jannel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Doralia is not blamable. Gisela is not bronzy. Gisela is thoughtful. Gisela is blamable. Gisela is not wolfish. Kathryne is sumatran. Kathryne is wolfish. Deni is braggy. Deni is not blamable. Deni is wolfish. Smart people are bronzy. If someone is bronzy then they are sumatran. If someone is sumatran then they are not liquid. If Doralia is bronzy and Doralia is liquid then Doralia is thoughtful. All liquid, sumatran people are blamable. If Gisela is bronzy and Gisela is braggy then Gisela is thoughtful. Smart people are braggy. If someone is wolfish and not sumatran then they are not braggy. Doralia is liquid.", "logic": "\nnot Blamable(doralia)\nnot Bronzy(gisela)\nThoughtful(gisela)\nBlamable(gisela)\nnot Wolfish(gisela)\nSumatran(kathryne)\nWolfish(kathryne)\nBraggy(deni)\nnot Blamable(deni)\nWolfish(deni)\nforall x (Wolfish(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nforall x (Bronzy(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nforall x (Sumatran(x) -> not Liquid(x))\nBronzy(doralia) and Liquid(doralia) -> Thoughtful(doralia)\nforall x (Liquid(x) and Sumatran(x) -> Blamable(x))\nBronzy(gisela) and Braggy(gisela) -> Thoughtful(gisela)\nforall x (Wolfish(x) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and not Sumatran(x) -> not Braggy(x))\n\nLiquid(doralia)\n\nLiquid(doralia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1248"} {"premises": "Theadora is coastal. Theadora is bumpkinly. Theadora is earthlike. Lew is coastal. Lew is bigeneric. Lew is stigmatic. Federica is loaded. Federica is bumpkinly. Federica is bigeneric. Federica is stigmatic. Federica is unvented. Federica is earthlike. If Theadora is stigmatic and Theadora is loaded then Theadora is earthlike. All bigeneric people are bumpkinly. If Lew is unvented then Lew is stigmatic. All coastal people are loaded. All coastal people are earthlike. Furry, earthlike people are unvented. Theadora is earthlike.", "logic": "\nCoastal(theadora)\nBumpkinly(theadora)\nEarthlike(theadora)\nCoastal(lew)\nBigeneric(lew)\nStigmatic(lew)\nLoaded(federica)\nBumpkinly(federica)\nBigeneric(federica)\nStigmatic(federica)\nUnvented(federica)\nEarthlike(federica)\nStigmatic(theadora) and Loaded(theadora) -> Earthlike(theadora)\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nUnvented(lew) -> Stigmatic(lew)\nforall x (Coastal(x) -> Loaded(x))\nforall x (Coastal(x) -> Earthlike(x))\nforall x (Loaded(x) and Earthlike(x) -> Unvented(x))\n\nEarthlike(theadora)\n\ntherefore Earthlike(theadora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1006"} {"premises": "Ivett is coagulable. Ivett is mycenaean. Ivett is staunch. Kayle is coagulable. Kayle is reigning. Kayle is star. Sharia is frowsy. Sharia is mycenaean. Sharia is reigning. Sharia is star. Sharia is rudderless. Sharia is staunch. If Ivett is star and Ivett is frowsy then Ivett is staunch. All reigning people are mycenaean. If Kayle is rudderless then Kayle is star. All coagulable people are frowsy. All coagulable people are staunch. Furry, staunch people are rudderless. Sharia is not mycenaean.", "logic": "\nCoagulable(ivett)\nMycenaean(ivett)\nStaunch(ivett)\nCoagulable(kayle)\nReigning(kayle)\nStar(kayle)\nFrowsy(sharia)\nMycenaean(sharia)\nReigning(sharia)\nStar(sharia)\nRudderless(sharia)\nStaunch(sharia)\nStar(ivett) and Frowsy(ivett) -> Staunch(ivett)\nforall x (Reigning(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nRudderless(kayle) -> Star(kayle)\nforall x (Coagulable(x) -> Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) -> Staunch(x))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) and Staunch(x) -> Rudderless(x))\n\nnot Mycenaean(sharia)\n\ntherefore Mycenaean(sharia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1006"} {"premises": "Lenora is bulblike. Lenora is scarlet. Lenora is unreported. Abram is bulblike. Abram is butcherly. Abram is scrappy. Emmott is located. Emmott is scarlet. Emmott is butcherly. Emmott is scrappy. Emmott is flavourful. Emmott is unreported. If Lenora is scrappy and Lenora is located then Lenora is unreported. All butcherly people are scarlet. If Abram is flavourful then Abram is scrappy. All bulblike people are located. All bulblike people are unreported. Furry, unreported people are flavourful. Abram is located.", "logic": "\nBulblike(lenora)\nScarlet(lenora)\nUnreported(lenora)\nBulblike(abram)\nButcherly(abram)\nScrappy(abram)\nLocated(emmott)\nScarlet(emmott)\nButcherly(emmott)\nScrappy(emmott)\nFlavourful(emmott)\nUnreported(emmott)\nScrappy(lenora) and Located(lenora) -> Unreported(lenora)\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Scarlet(x))\nFlavourful(abram) -> Scrappy(abram)\nforall x (Bulblike(x) -> Located(x))\nforall x (Bulblike(x) -> Unreported(x))\nforall x (Located(x) and Unreported(x) -> Flavourful(x))\n\nLocated(abram)\n\nBulblike(abram) and forall x (Bulblike(x) -> Located(x)) -> therefore Located(abram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1006"} {"premises": "Sherwin is antiguan. Sherwin is adjuvant. Sherwin is precocial. Taryn is antiguan. Taryn is casteless. Taryn is uric. Perceval is sexy. Perceval is adjuvant. Perceval is casteless. Perceval is uric. Perceval is wilsonian. Perceval is precocial. If Sherwin is uric and Sherwin is sexy then Sherwin is precocial. All casteless people are adjuvant. If Taryn is wilsonian then Taryn is uric. All antiguan people are sexy. All antiguan people are precocial. Furry, precocial people are wilsonian. Taryn is not precocial.", "logic": "\nAntiguan(sherwin)\nAdjuvant(sherwin)\nPrecocial(sherwin)\nAntiguan(taryn)\nCasteless(taryn)\nUric(taryn)\nSexy(perceval)\nAdjuvant(perceval)\nCasteless(perceval)\nUric(perceval)\nWilsonian(perceval)\nPrecocial(perceval)\nUric(sherwin) and Sexy(sherwin) -> Precocial(sherwin)\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> Adjuvant(x))\nWilsonian(taryn) -> Uric(taryn)\nforall x (Antiguan(x) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Antiguan(x) -> Precocial(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) and Precocial(x) -> Wilsonian(x))\n\nnot Precocial(taryn)\n\nAntiguan(taryn) and forall x (Antiguan(x) -> Precocial(x)) -> therefore Precocial(taryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1006"} {"premises": "Adorne is bulimic. Adorne is malaysian. Adorne is succinct. Stacee is bulimic. Stacee is italic. Stacee is utter. Ardelia is bootless. Ardelia is malaysian. Ardelia is italic. Ardelia is utter. Ardelia is lawless. Ardelia is succinct. If Adorne is utter and Adorne is bootless then Adorne is succinct. All italic people are malaysian. If Stacee is lawless then Stacee is utter. All bulimic people are bootless. All bulimic people are succinct. Furry, succinct people are lawless. Adorne is not italic.", "logic": "\nBulimic(adorne)\nMalaysian(adorne)\nSuccinct(adorne)\nBulimic(stacee)\nItalic(stacee)\nUtter(stacee)\nBootless(ardelia)\nMalaysian(ardelia)\nItalic(ardelia)\nUtter(ardelia)\nLawless(ardelia)\nSuccinct(ardelia)\nUtter(adorne) and Bootless(adorne) -> Succinct(adorne)\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Malaysian(x))\nLawless(stacee) -> Utter(stacee)\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Bootless(x))\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Succinct(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Succinct(x) -> Lawless(x))\n\nnot Italic(adorne)\n\nnot Italic(adorne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1006"} {"premises": "Gustavo is rude. Gustavo is albinal. Gustavo is comose. Doug is rude. Doug is underlying. Doug is announced. Mikey is uncommon. Mikey is albinal. Mikey is underlying. Mikey is announced. Mikey is analogue. Mikey is comose. If Gustavo is announced and Gustavo is uncommon then Gustavo is comose. All underlying people are albinal. If Doug is analogue then Doug is announced. All rude people are uncommon. All rude people are comose. Furry, comose people are analogue. Gustavo is announced.", "logic": "\nRude(gustavo)\nAlbinal(gustavo)\nComose(gustavo)\nRude(doug)\nUnderlying(doug)\nAnnounced(doug)\nUncommon(mikey)\nAlbinal(mikey)\nUnderlying(mikey)\nAnnounced(mikey)\nAnalogue(mikey)\nComose(mikey)\nAnnounced(gustavo) and Uncommon(gustavo) -> Comose(gustavo)\nforall x (Underlying(x) -> Albinal(x))\nAnalogue(doug) -> Announced(doug)\nforall x (Rude(x) -> Uncommon(x))\nforall x (Rude(x) -> Comose(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and Comose(x) -> Analogue(x))\n\nAnnounced(gustavo)\n\nAnnounced(gustavo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1006"} {"premises": "The fergus is attested. The fergus aggroup the stace. The madona cascade the fergus. The madona cascade the elise. The stace is collateral. The stace is expedient. The stace cascade the madona. The stace cascade the elise. The elise does not like the stace. The elise cascade the madona. If the fergus is collateral then the fergus crown the stace. If something is brumous and it does not like the elise then it is attested. If the fergus is collateral and the elise does not eat the fergus then the elise is attested. If the elise cascade the madona and the elise does not like the fergus then the elise aggroup the madona. If something is collateral and expedient then it is not brumous. If something aggroup the stace then it is brumous. The stace cascade the madona.", "logic": "\nAttested(fergus)\nAggroup(fergus, stace)\nCascade(madona, fergus)\nCascade(madona, elise)\nCollateral(stace)\nExpedient(stace)\nCascade(stace, madona)\nCascade(stace, elise)\nnot Aggroup(elise, stace)\nCascade(elise, madona)\nCollateral(fergus) -> Crown(fergus, stace)\nforall x (Brumous(x) and not Aggroup(x, elise) -> Attested(x))\nCollateral(fergus) and not Crown(elise, fergus) -> Attested(elise)\nCascade(elise, madona) and not Aggroup(elise, fergus) -> Aggroup(elise, madona)\nforall x (Collateral(x) and Expedient(x) -> not Brumous(x))\nforall x (Aggroup(x, stace) -> Brumous(x))\n\nCascade(stace, madona)\n\ntherefore Cascade(stace, madona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "The truman is algonquin. The truman blaspheme the karon. The storey alter the truman. The storey alter the jodi. The karon is neolithic. The karon is imbecile. The karon alter the storey. The karon alter the jodi. The jodi does not like the karon. The jodi alter the storey. If the truman is neolithic then the truman track the karon. If something is waxlike and it does not like the jodi then it is algonquin. If the truman is neolithic and the jodi does not eat the truman then the jodi is algonquin. If the jodi alter the storey and the jodi does not like the truman then the jodi blaspheme the storey. If something is neolithic and imbecile then it is not waxlike. If something blaspheme the karon then it is waxlike. The truman is not algonquin.", "logic": "\nAlgonquin(truman)\nBlaspheme(truman, karon)\nAlter(storey, truman)\nAlter(storey, jodi)\nNeolithic(karon)\nImbecile(karon)\nAlter(karon, storey)\nAlter(karon, jodi)\nnot Blaspheme(jodi, karon)\nAlter(jodi, storey)\nNeolithic(truman) -> Track(truman, karon)\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and not Blaspheme(x, jodi) -> Algonquin(x))\nNeolithic(truman) and not Track(jodi, truman) -> Algonquin(jodi)\nAlter(jodi, storey) and not Blaspheme(jodi, truman) -> Blaspheme(jodi, storey)\nforall x (Neolithic(x) and Imbecile(x) -> not Waxlike(x))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, karon) -> Waxlike(x))\n\nnot Algonquin(truman)\n\ntherefore Algonquin(truman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "The halimeda is motivated. The halimeda suffuse the seline. The hilda quicken the halimeda. The hilda quicken the cosmo. The seline is abysmal. The seline is locomotive. The seline quicken the hilda. The seline quicken the cosmo. The cosmo does not like the seline. The cosmo quicken the hilda. If the halimeda is abysmal then the halimeda speckle the seline. If something is ophthalmic and it does not like the cosmo then it is motivated. If the halimeda is abysmal and the cosmo does not eat the halimeda then the cosmo is motivated. If the cosmo quicken the hilda and the cosmo does not like the halimeda then the cosmo suffuse the hilda. If something is abysmal and locomotive then it is not ophthalmic. If something suffuse the seline then it is ophthalmic. The halimeda is ophthalmic.", "logic": "\nMotivated(halimeda)\nSuffuse(halimeda, seline)\nQuicken(hilda, halimeda)\nQuicken(hilda, cosmo)\nAbysmal(seline)\nLocomotive(seline)\nQuicken(seline, hilda)\nQuicken(seline, cosmo)\nnot Suffuse(cosmo, seline)\nQuicken(cosmo, hilda)\nAbysmal(halimeda) -> Speckle(halimeda, seline)\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) and not Suffuse(x, cosmo) -> Motivated(x))\nAbysmal(halimeda) and not Speckle(cosmo, halimeda) -> Motivated(cosmo)\nQuicken(cosmo, hilda) and not Suffuse(cosmo, halimeda) -> Suffuse(cosmo, hilda)\nforall x (Abysmal(x) and Locomotive(x) -> not Ophthalmic(x))\nforall x (Suffuse(x, seline) -> Ophthalmic(x))\n\nOphthalmic(halimeda)\n\nSuffuse(halimeda, seline) and forall x (Suffuse(x, seline) -> Ophthalmic(x)) -> therefore Ophthalmic(halimeda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "The ilene is amenable. The ilene buss the renato. The cinda string the ilene. The cinda string the sigfried. The renato is sightless. The renato is tentative. The renato string the cinda. The renato string the sigfried. The sigfried does not like the renato. The sigfried string the cinda. If the ilene is sightless then the ilene salaam the renato. If something is plodding and it does not like the sigfried then it is amenable. If the ilene is sightless and the sigfried does not eat the ilene then the sigfried is amenable. If the sigfried string the cinda and the sigfried does not like the ilene then the sigfried buss the cinda. If something is sightless and tentative then it is not plodding. If something buss the renato then it is plodding. The renato is plodding.", "logic": "\nAmenable(ilene)\nBuss(ilene, renato)\nString(cinda, ilene)\nString(cinda, sigfried)\nSightless(renato)\nTentative(renato)\nString(renato, cinda)\nString(renato, sigfried)\nnot Buss(sigfried, renato)\nString(sigfried, cinda)\nSightless(ilene) -> Salaam(ilene, renato)\nforall x (Plodding(x) and not Buss(x, sigfried) -> Amenable(x))\nSightless(ilene) and not Salaam(sigfried, ilene) -> Amenable(sigfried)\nString(sigfried, cinda) and not Buss(sigfried, ilene) -> Buss(sigfried, cinda)\nforall x (Sightless(x) and Tentative(x) -> not Plodding(x))\nforall x (Buss(x, renato) -> Plodding(x))\n\nPlodding(renato)\n\nSightless(renato) and Tentative(renato) and forall x (Sightless(x) and Tentative(x) -> not Plodding(x)) -> therefore not Plodding(renato)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "The jelene is nonuple. The jelene insufflate the rica. The catlee chair the jelene. The catlee chair the querida. The rica is hindustani. The rica is sorrowing. The rica chair the catlee. The rica chair the querida. The querida does not like the rica. The querida chair the catlee. If the jelene is hindustani then the jelene joint the rica. If something is lumpen and it does not like the querida then it is nonuple. If the jelene is hindustani and the querida does not eat the jelene then the querida is nonuple. If the querida chair the catlee and the querida does not like the jelene then the querida insufflate the catlee. If something is hindustani and sorrowing then it is not lumpen. If something insufflate the rica then it is lumpen. The catlee is not nonuple.", "logic": "\nNonuple(jelene)\nInsufflate(jelene, rica)\nChair(catlee, jelene)\nChair(catlee, querida)\nHindustani(rica)\nSorrowing(rica)\nChair(rica, catlee)\nChair(rica, querida)\nnot Insufflate(querida, rica)\nChair(querida, catlee)\nHindustani(jelene) -> Joint(jelene, rica)\nforall x (Lumpen(x) and not Insufflate(x, querida) -> Nonuple(x))\nHindustani(jelene) and not Joint(querida, jelene) -> Nonuple(querida)\nChair(querida, catlee) and not Insufflate(querida, jelene) -> Insufflate(querida, catlee)\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Sorrowing(x) -> not Lumpen(x))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, rica) -> Lumpen(x))\n\nnot Nonuple(catlee)\n\nforall x (Lumpen(x) and not Insufflate(x, querida) -> Nonuple(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "The dick is malted. The dick panel the matthieu. The flin spare the dick. The flin spare the shorty. The matthieu is alpestrine. The matthieu is bracted. The matthieu spare the flin. The matthieu spare the shorty. The shorty does not like the matthieu. The shorty spare the flin. If the dick is alpestrine then the dick perturb the matthieu. If something is stretch and it does not like the shorty then it is malted. If the dick is alpestrine and the shorty does not eat the dick then the shorty is malted. If the shorty spare the flin and the shorty does not like the dick then the shorty panel the flin. If something is alpestrine and bracted then it is not stretch. If something panel the matthieu then it is stretch. The shorty is stretch.", "logic": "\nMalted(dick)\nPanel(dick, matthieu)\nSpare(flin, dick)\nSpare(flin, shorty)\nAlpestrine(matthieu)\nBracted(matthieu)\nSpare(matthieu, flin)\nSpare(matthieu, shorty)\nnot Panel(shorty, matthieu)\nSpare(shorty, flin)\nAlpestrine(dick) -> Perturb(dick, matthieu)\nforall x (Stretch(x) and not Panel(x, shorty) -> Malted(x))\nAlpestrine(dick) and not Perturb(shorty, dick) -> Malted(shorty)\nSpare(shorty, flin) and not Panel(shorty, dick) -> Panel(shorty, flin)\nforall x (Alpestrine(x) and Bracted(x) -> not Stretch(x))\nforall x (Panel(x, matthieu) -> Stretch(x))\n\nStretch(shorty)\n\nforall x (Panel(x, matthieu) -> Stretch(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "The dehlia is serpentine. The dehlia floodlight the chrissy. The tova abate the dehlia. The tova abate the stefano. The chrissy is unaged. The chrissy is umber. The chrissy abate the tova. The chrissy abate the stefano. The stefano does not like the chrissy. The stefano abate the tova. If the dehlia is unaged then the dehlia dodge the chrissy. If something is economical and it does not like the stefano then it is serpentine. If the dehlia is unaged and the stefano does not eat the dehlia then the stefano is serpentine. If the stefano abate the tova and the stefano does not like the dehlia then the stefano floodlight the tova. If something is unaged and umber then it is not economical. If something floodlight the chrissy then it is economical. The stefano does not see the chrissy.", "logic": "\nSerpentine(dehlia)\nFloodlight(dehlia, chrissy)\nAbate(tova, dehlia)\nAbate(tova, stefano)\nUnaged(chrissy)\nUmber(chrissy)\nAbate(chrissy, tova)\nAbate(chrissy, stefano)\nnot Floodlight(stefano, chrissy)\nAbate(stefano, tova)\nUnaged(dehlia) -> Dodge(dehlia, chrissy)\nforall x (Economical(x) and not Floodlight(x, stefano) -> Serpentine(x))\nUnaged(dehlia) and not Dodge(stefano, dehlia) -> Serpentine(stefano)\nAbate(stefano, tova) and not Floodlight(stefano, dehlia) -> Floodlight(stefano, tova)\nforall x (Unaged(x) and Umber(x) -> not Economical(x))\nforall x (Floodlight(x, chrissy) -> Economical(x))\n\nnot Abate(stefano, chrissy)\n\nnot Abate(stefano, chrissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "The idalina is nullified. The idalina cheer the denise. The desiri trust the idalina. The desiri trust the torrey. The denise is bicentric. The denise is dreamlike. The denise trust the desiri. The denise trust the torrey. The torrey does not like the denise. The torrey trust the desiri. If the idalina is bicentric then the idalina waltz the denise. If something is plundering and it does not like the torrey then it is nullified. If the idalina is bicentric and the torrey does not eat the idalina then the torrey is nullified. If the torrey trust the desiri and the torrey does not like the idalina then the torrey cheer the desiri. If something is bicentric and dreamlike then it is not plundering. If something cheer the denise then it is plundering. The denise waltz the idalina.", "logic": "\nNullified(idalina)\nCheer(idalina, denise)\nTrust(desiri, idalina)\nTrust(desiri, torrey)\nBicentric(denise)\nDreamlike(denise)\nTrust(denise, desiri)\nTrust(denise, torrey)\nnot Cheer(torrey, denise)\nTrust(torrey, desiri)\nBicentric(idalina) -> Waltz(idalina, denise)\nforall x (Plundering(x) and not Cheer(x, torrey) -> Nullified(x))\nBicentric(idalina) and not Waltz(torrey, idalina) -> Nullified(torrey)\nTrust(torrey, desiri) and not Cheer(torrey, idalina) -> Cheer(torrey, desiri)\nforall x (Bicentric(x) and Dreamlike(x) -> not Plundering(x))\nforall x (Cheer(x, denise) -> Plundering(x))\n\nWaltz(denise, idalina)\n\nWaltz(denise, idalina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1581"} {"premises": "Gwenni is retarded. Mahmoud is imperfect. If someone is imperfect and not scientific then they are prepacked. All retarded, dipterous people are imperfect. Gwenni is retarded.", "logic": "\nRetarded(gwenni)\nImperfect(mahmoud)\nforall x (Imperfect(x) and not Scientific(x) -> Prepacked(x))\nforall x (Retarded(x) and Dipterous(x) -> Imperfect(x))\n\nRetarded(gwenni)\n\ntherefore Retarded(gwenni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1894"} {"premises": "Horatius is clogged. Rose is shavian. If someone is shavian and not polyphase then they are realizable. All clogged, binding people are shavian. Rose is not shavian.", "logic": "\nClogged(horatius)\nShavian(rose)\nforall x (Shavian(x) and not Polyphase(x) -> Realizable(x))\nforall x (Clogged(x) and Binding(x) -> Shavian(x))\n\nnot Shavian(rose)\n\ntherefore Shavian(rose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1894"} {"premises": "Alan is knowable. Abigale is holophytic. If someone is holophytic and not liked then they are salty. All knowable, unifoliate people are holophytic. Abigale is not salty.", "logic": "\nKnowable(alan)\nHolophytic(abigale)\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and not Liked(x) -> Salty(x))\nforall x (Knowable(x) and Unifoliate(x) -> Holophytic(x))\n\nnot Salty(abigale)\n\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and not Liked(x) -> Salty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1894"} {"premises": "Deina is chaffy. Sheffield is tagged. If someone is tagged and not mimetic then they are cymose. All chaffy, crispy people are tagged. Deina is crispy.", "logic": "\nChaffy(deina)\nTagged(sheffield)\nforall x (Tagged(x) and not Mimetic(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Chaffy(x) and Crispy(x) -> Tagged(x))\n\nCrispy(deina)\n\nCrispy(deina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1894"} {"premises": "The don bedraggle the alister. The virgilio is unmovable. The alister bedraggle the don. If someone bedraggle the virgilio and they need the alister then the virgilio is prolonged. If the virgilio maunder the alister then the virgilio breathe the alister. If someone is exogenous then they need the virgilio. If someone maunder the don then the don is coastwise. If the don is coastwise then the don maunder the virgilio. If the don maunder the alister then the don is unmovable. If the don bedraggle the alister and the don breathe the alister then the alister bedraggle the virgilio. If someone bedraggle the don and the don bedraggle the alister then they need the virgilio. The alister bedraggle the don.", "logic": "\nBedraggle(don, alister)\nUnmovable(virgilio)\nBedraggle(alister, don)\nforall x (Bedraggle(x, virgilio) and Breathe(x, alister) -> Prolonged(virgilio))\nMaunder(virgilio, alister) -> Breathe(virgilio, alister)\nforall x (Exogenous(x) -> Breathe(x, virgilio))\nforall x (Maunder(x, don) -> Coastwise(don))\nCoastwise(don) -> Maunder(don, virgilio)\nMaunder(don, alister) -> Unmovable(don)\nBedraggle(don, alister) and Breathe(don, alister) -> Bedraggle(alister, virgilio)\nforall x (Bedraggle(x, don) and Bedraggle(don, alister) -> Breathe(x, virgilio))\n\nBedraggle(alister, don)\n\ntherefore Bedraggle(alister, don)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-355"} {"premises": "The vinod impute the nessi. The kimberley is witty. The nessi impute the vinod. If someone impute the kimberley and they need the nessi then the kimberley is gentle. If the kimberley warble the nessi then the kimberley reprise the nessi. If someone is delinquent then they need the kimberley. If someone warble the vinod then the vinod is capsular. If the vinod is capsular then the vinod warble the kimberley. If the vinod warble the nessi then the vinod is witty. If the vinod impute the nessi and the vinod reprise the nessi then the nessi impute the kimberley. If someone impute the vinod and the vinod impute the nessi then they need the kimberley. The kimberley is not witty.", "logic": "\nImpute(vinod, nessi)\nWitty(kimberley)\nImpute(nessi, vinod)\nforall x (Impute(x, kimberley) and Reprise(x, nessi) -> Gentle(kimberley))\nWarble(kimberley, nessi) -> Reprise(kimberley, nessi)\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> Reprise(x, kimberley))\nforall x (Warble(x, vinod) -> Capsular(vinod))\nCapsular(vinod) -> Warble(vinod, kimberley)\nWarble(vinod, nessi) -> Witty(vinod)\nImpute(vinod, nessi) and Reprise(vinod, nessi) -> Impute(nessi, kimberley)\nforall x (Impute(x, vinod) and Impute(vinod, nessi) -> Reprise(x, kimberley))\n\nnot Witty(kimberley)\n\ntherefore Witty(kimberley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-355"} {"premises": "The may grace the scarlett. The bret is pastel. The scarlett grace the may. If someone grace the bret and they need the scarlett then the bret is adulterous. If the bret leverage the scarlett then the bret festinate the scarlett. If someone is tremulous then they need the bret. If someone leverage the may then the may is unlamented. If the may is unlamented then the may leverage the bret. If the may leverage the scarlett then the may is pastel. If the may grace the scarlett and the may festinate the scarlett then the scarlett grace the bret. If someone grace the may and the may grace the scarlett then they need the bret. The bret does not need the bret.", "logic": "\nGrace(may, scarlett)\nPastel(bret)\nGrace(scarlett, may)\nforall x (Grace(x, bret) and Festinate(x, scarlett) -> Adulterous(bret))\nLeverage(bret, scarlett) -> Festinate(bret, scarlett)\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Festinate(x, bret))\nforall x (Leverage(x, may) -> Unlamented(may))\nUnlamented(may) -> Leverage(may, bret)\nLeverage(may, scarlett) -> Pastel(may)\nGrace(may, scarlett) and Festinate(may, scarlett) -> Grace(scarlett, bret)\nforall x (Grace(x, may) and Grace(may, scarlett) -> Festinate(x, bret))\n\nnot Festinate(bret, bret)\n\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Festinate(x, bret)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-355"} {"premises": "The cloe wane the kordula. The terence is burrlike. The kordula wane the cloe. If someone wane the terence and they need the kordula then the terence is unleavened. If the terence concrete the kordula then the terence crow the kordula. If someone is wizard then they need the terence. If someone concrete the cloe then the cloe is cranial. If the cloe is cranial then the cloe concrete the terence. If the cloe concrete the kordula then the cloe is burrlike. If the cloe wane the kordula and the cloe crow the kordula then the kordula wane the terence. If someone wane the cloe and the cloe wane the kordula then they need the terence. The terence crow the cloe.", "logic": "\nWane(cloe, kordula)\nBurrlike(terence)\nWane(kordula, cloe)\nforall x (Wane(x, terence) and Crow(x, kordula) -> Unleavened(terence))\nConcrete(terence, kordula) -> Crow(terence, kordula)\nforall x (Wizard(x) -> Crow(x, terence))\nforall x (Concrete(x, cloe) -> Cranial(cloe))\nCranial(cloe) -> Concrete(cloe, terence)\nConcrete(cloe, kordula) -> Burrlike(cloe)\nWane(cloe, kordula) and Crow(cloe, kordula) -> Wane(kordula, terence)\nforall x (Wane(x, cloe) and Wane(cloe, kordula) -> Crow(x, terence))\n\nCrow(terence, cloe)\n\nCrow(terence, cloe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-355"} {"premises": "Bobette is decimal. Bobette is peregrine. Bobette is operating. Bobette is grapy. Kalila is peregrine. Kalila is spermatic. Kalila is operating. Vinni is grapy. Aila is pliant. Aila is operating. If Kalila is not peregrine then Kalila is not operating. All decimal, prostyle things are operating. If something is spermatic and not prostyle then it is operating. If something is operating and decimal then it is grapy. If something is pliant and spermatic then it is grapy. If something is grapy and peregrine then it is pliant. Red things are decimal. If Aila is grapy and Aila is pliant then Aila is decimal. Bobette is decimal.", "logic": "\nDecimal(bobette)\nPeregrine(bobette)\nOperating(bobette)\nGrapy(bobette)\nPeregrine(kalila)\nSpermatic(kalila)\nOperating(kalila)\nGrapy(vinni)\nPliant(aila)\nOperating(aila)\nnot Peregrine(kalila) -> not Operating(kalila)\nforall x (Decimal(x) and Prostyle(x) -> Operating(x))\nforall x (Spermatic(x) and not Prostyle(x) -> Operating(x))\nforall x (Operating(x) and Decimal(x) -> Grapy(x))\nforall x (Pliant(x) and Spermatic(x) -> Grapy(x))\nforall x (Grapy(x) and Peregrine(x) -> Pliant(x))\nforall x (Spermatic(x) -> Decimal(x))\nGrapy(aila) and Pliant(aila) -> Decimal(aila)\n\nDecimal(bobette)\n\ntherefore Decimal(bobette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Therese is unpierced. Therese is exogamous. Therese is adjuvant. Therese is meiotic. Ave is exogamous. Ave is gloomy. Ave is adjuvant. Cherlyn is meiotic. Tessie is abstracted. Tessie is adjuvant. If Ave is not exogamous then Ave is not adjuvant. All unpierced, ninepenny things are adjuvant. If something is gloomy and not ninepenny then it is adjuvant. If something is adjuvant and unpierced then it is meiotic. If something is abstracted and gloomy then it is meiotic. If something is meiotic and exogamous then it is abstracted. Red things are unpierced. If Tessie is meiotic and Tessie is abstracted then Tessie is unpierced. Therese is not unpierced.", "logic": "\nUnpierced(therese)\nExogamous(therese)\nAdjuvant(therese)\nMeiotic(therese)\nExogamous(ave)\nGloomy(ave)\nAdjuvant(ave)\nMeiotic(cherlyn)\nAbstracted(tessie)\nAdjuvant(tessie)\nnot Exogamous(ave) -> not Adjuvant(ave)\nforall x (Unpierced(x) and Ninepenny(x) -> Adjuvant(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and not Ninepenny(x) -> Adjuvant(x))\nforall x (Adjuvant(x) and Unpierced(x) -> Meiotic(x))\nforall x (Abstracted(x) and Gloomy(x) -> Meiotic(x))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Exogamous(x) -> Abstracted(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> Unpierced(x))\nMeiotic(tessie) and Abstracted(tessie) -> Unpierced(tessie)\n\nnot Unpierced(therese)\n\ntherefore Unpierced(therese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Gonzalo is confusable. Gonzalo is exsanguine. Gonzalo is xxix. Gonzalo is inartistic. Cass is exsanguine. Cass is demanding. Cass is xxix. Annie is inartistic. Darius is wretched. Darius is xxix. If Cass is not exsanguine then Cass is not xxix. All confusable, lentiform things are xxix. If something is demanding and not lentiform then it is xxix. If something is xxix and confusable then it is inartistic. If something is wretched and demanding then it is inartistic. If something is inartistic and exsanguine then it is wretched. Red things are confusable. If Darius is inartistic and Darius is wretched then Darius is confusable. Cass is confusable.", "logic": "\nConfusable(gonzalo)\nExsanguine(gonzalo)\nXxix(gonzalo)\nInartistic(gonzalo)\nExsanguine(cass)\nDemanding(cass)\nXxix(cass)\nInartistic(annie)\nWretched(darius)\nXxix(darius)\nnot Exsanguine(cass) -> not Xxix(cass)\nforall x (Confusable(x) and Lentiform(x) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) and not Lentiform(x) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Xxix(x) and Confusable(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Wretched(x) and Demanding(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Inartistic(x) and Exsanguine(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Confusable(x))\nInartistic(darius) and Wretched(darius) -> Confusable(darius)\n\nConfusable(cass)\n\nDemanding(cass) and forall x (Demanding(x) -> Confusable(x)) -> therefore Confusable(cass)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Georgetta is serene. Georgetta is gracious. Georgetta is longtime. Georgetta is tearless. Sandor is gracious. Sandor is hominid. Sandor is longtime. Alexa is tearless. Marnia is eased. Marnia is longtime. If Sandor is not gracious then Sandor is not longtime. All serene, schmaltzy things are longtime. If something is hominid and not schmaltzy then it is longtime. If something is longtime and serene then it is tearless. If something is eased and hominid then it is tearless. If something is tearless and gracious then it is eased. Red things are serene. If Marnia is tearless and Marnia is eased then Marnia is serene. Sandor is not serene.", "logic": "\nSerene(georgetta)\nGracious(georgetta)\nLongtime(georgetta)\nTearless(georgetta)\nGracious(sandor)\nHominid(sandor)\nLongtime(sandor)\nTearless(alexa)\nEased(marnia)\nLongtime(marnia)\nnot Gracious(sandor) -> not Longtime(sandor)\nforall x (Serene(x) and Schmaltzy(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Hominid(x) and not Schmaltzy(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Longtime(x) and Serene(x) -> Tearless(x))\nforall x (Eased(x) and Hominid(x) -> Tearless(x))\nforall x (Tearless(x) and Gracious(x) -> Eased(x))\nforall x (Hominid(x) -> Serene(x))\nTearless(marnia) and Eased(marnia) -> Serene(marnia)\n\nnot Serene(sandor)\n\nHominid(sandor) and forall x (Hominid(x) -> Serene(x)) -> therefore Serene(sandor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Marlyn is meshuga. Marlyn is obese. Marlyn is uncounted. Marlyn is closed. Ira is obese. Ira is awny. Ira is uncounted. Tuesday is closed. Suzann is asyndetic. Suzann is uncounted. If Ira is not obese then Ira is not uncounted. All meshuga, pleasing things are uncounted. If something is awny and not pleasing then it is uncounted. If something is uncounted and meshuga then it is closed. If something is asyndetic and awny then it is closed. If something is closed and obese then it is asyndetic. Red things are meshuga. If Suzann is closed and Suzann is asyndetic then Suzann is meshuga. Ira is closed.", "logic": "\nMeshuga(marlyn)\nObese(marlyn)\nUncounted(marlyn)\nClosed(marlyn)\nObese(ira)\nAwny(ira)\nUncounted(ira)\nClosed(tuesday)\nAsyndetic(suzann)\nUncounted(suzann)\nnot Obese(ira) -> not Uncounted(ira)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) and Pleasing(x) -> Uncounted(x))\nforall x (Awny(x) and not Pleasing(x) -> Uncounted(x))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) and Meshuga(x) -> Closed(x))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) and Awny(x) -> Closed(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) and Obese(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Awny(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nClosed(suzann) and Asyndetic(suzann) -> Meshuga(suzann)\n\nClosed(ira)\n\nAwny(ira) and forall x (Awny(x) -> Meshuga(x)) -> therefore Meshuga(ira) Uncounted(ira) and Meshuga(ira) and forall x (Uncounted(x) and Meshuga(x) -> Closed(x)) -> therefore Closed(ira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Zed is cyclic. Zed is eutherian. Zed is edwardian. Zed is risque. Jasmine is eutherian. Jasmine is eared. Jasmine is edwardian. Juergen is risque. Aldric is undefeated. Aldric is edwardian. If Jasmine is not eutherian then Jasmine is not edwardian. All cyclic, chylaceous things are edwardian. If something is eared and not chylaceous then it is edwardian. If something is edwardian and cyclic then it is risque. If something is undefeated and eared then it is risque. If something is risque and eutherian then it is undefeated. Red things are cyclic. If Aldric is risque and Aldric is undefeated then Aldric is cyclic. Jasmine is not risque.", "logic": "\nCyclic(zed)\nEutherian(zed)\nEdwardian(zed)\nRisque(zed)\nEutherian(jasmine)\nEared(jasmine)\nEdwardian(jasmine)\nRisque(juergen)\nUndefeated(aldric)\nEdwardian(aldric)\nnot Eutherian(jasmine) -> not Edwardian(jasmine)\nforall x (Cyclic(x) and Chylaceous(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Eared(x) and not Chylaceous(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Edwardian(x) and Cyclic(x) -> Risque(x))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and Eared(x) -> Risque(x))\nforall x (Risque(x) and Eutherian(x) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Eared(x) -> Cyclic(x))\nRisque(aldric) and Undefeated(aldric) -> Cyclic(aldric)\n\nnot Risque(jasmine)\n\nEared(jasmine) and forall x (Eared(x) -> Cyclic(x)) -> therefore Cyclic(jasmine) Edwardian(jasmine) and Cyclic(jasmine) and forall x (Edwardian(x) and Cyclic(x) -> Risque(x)) -> therefore Risque(jasmine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Alyss is flakey. Alyss is depicted. Alyss is cretinous. Alyss is eleven. Gunther is depicted. Gunther is curvey. Gunther is cretinous. Moises is eleven. Odelia is colonnaded. Odelia is cretinous. If Gunther is not depicted then Gunther is not cretinous. All flakey, unwitting things are cretinous. If something is curvey and not unwitting then it is cretinous. If something is cretinous and flakey then it is eleven. If something is colonnaded and curvey then it is eleven. If something is eleven and depicted then it is colonnaded. Red things are flakey. If Odelia is eleven and Odelia is colonnaded then Odelia is flakey. Gunther is colonnaded.", "logic": "\nFlakey(alyss)\nDepicted(alyss)\nCretinous(alyss)\nEleven(alyss)\nDepicted(gunther)\nCurvey(gunther)\nCretinous(gunther)\nEleven(moises)\nColonnaded(odelia)\nCretinous(odelia)\nnot Depicted(gunther) -> not Cretinous(gunther)\nforall x (Flakey(x) and Unwitting(x) -> Cretinous(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) and not Unwitting(x) -> Cretinous(x))\nforall x (Cretinous(x) and Flakey(x) -> Eleven(x))\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) and Curvey(x) -> Eleven(x))\nforall x (Eleven(x) and Depicted(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Flakey(x))\nEleven(odelia) and Colonnaded(odelia) -> Flakey(odelia)\n\nColonnaded(gunther)\n\nCurvey(gunther) and forall x (Curvey(x) -> Flakey(x)) -> therefore Flakey(gunther) Cretinous(gunther) and Flakey(gunther) and forall x (Cretinous(x) and Flakey(x) -> Eleven(x)) -> therefore Eleven(gunther) Eleven(gunther) and Depicted(gunther) and forall x (Eleven(x) and Depicted(x) -> Colonnaded(x)) -> therefore Colonnaded(gunther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Faina is offbeat. Faina is ankylotic. Faina is glabrous. Faina is tetragonal. Bessy is ankylotic. Bessy is annelid. Bessy is glabrous. Gael is tetragonal. Agretha is unexpected. Agretha is glabrous. If Bessy is not ankylotic then Bessy is not glabrous. All offbeat, sonic things are glabrous. If something is annelid and not sonic then it is glabrous. If something is glabrous and offbeat then it is tetragonal. If something is unexpected and annelid then it is tetragonal. If something is tetragonal and ankylotic then it is unexpected. Red things are offbeat. If Agretha is tetragonal and Agretha is unexpected then Agretha is offbeat. Bessy is not unexpected.", "logic": "\nOffbeat(faina)\nAnkylotic(faina)\nGlabrous(faina)\nTetragonal(faina)\nAnkylotic(bessy)\nAnnelid(bessy)\nGlabrous(bessy)\nTetragonal(gael)\nUnexpected(agretha)\nGlabrous(agretha)\nnot Ankylotic(bessy) -> not Glabrous(bessy)\nforall x (Offbeat(x) and Sonic(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nforall x (Annelid(x) and not Sonic(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nforall x (Glabrous(x) and Offbeat(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Unexpected(x) and Annelid(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and Ankylotic(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Annelid(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nTetragonal(agretha) and Unexpected(agretha) -> Offbeat(agretha)\n\nnot Unexpected(bessy)\n\nAnnelid(bessy) and forall x (Annelid(x) -> Offbeat(x)) -> therefore Offbeat(bessy) Glabrous(bessy) and Offbeat(bessy) and forall x (Glabrous(x) and Offbeat(x) -> Tetragonal(x)) -> therefore Tetragonal(bessy) Tetragonal(bessy) and Ankylotic(bessy) and forall x (Tetragonal(x) and Ankylotic(x) -> Unexpected(x)) -> therefore Unexpected(bessy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Lisabeth is moresque. Lisabeth is bumbling. Lisabeth is moonless. Lisabeth is bilocular. Mikel is bumbling. Mikel is coordinate. Mikel is moonless. Reynard is bilocular. Ole is placed. Ole is moonless. If Mikel is not bumbling then Mikel is not moonless. All moresque, plucky things are moonless. If something is coordinate and not plucky then it is moonless. If something is moonless and moresque then it is bilocular. If something is placed and coordinate then it is bilocular. If something is bilocular and bumbling then it is placed. Red things are moresque. If Ole is bilocular and Ole is placed then Ole is moresque. Reynard is not placed.", "logic": "\nMoresque(lisabeth)\nBumbling(lisabeth)\nMoonless(lisabeth)\nBilocular(lisabeth)\nBumbling(mikel)\nCoordinate(mikel)\nMoonless(mikel)\nBilocular(reynard)\nPlaced(ole)\nMoonless(ole)\nnot Bumbling(mikel) -> not Moonless(mikel)\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Plucky(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) and not Plucky(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (Moonless(x) and Moresque(x) -> Bilocular(x))\nforall x (Placed(x) and Coordinate(x) -> Bilocular(x))\nforall x (Bilocular(x) and Bumbling(x) -> Placed(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Moresque(x))\nBilocular(ole) and Placed(ole) -> Moresque(ole)\n\nnot Placed(reynard)\n\nforall x (Bilocular(x) and Bumbling(x) -> Placed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Myron is glary. Myron is cumbrous. Myron is mineral. Myron is abducting. Whitman is cumbrous. Whitman is pricey. Whitman is mineral. Roslyn is abducting. Phillie is untaped. Phillie is mineral. If Whitman is not cumbrous then Whitman is not mineral. All glary, pectoral things are mineral. If something is pricey and not pectoral then it is mineral. If something is mineral and glary then it is abducting. If something is untaped and pricey then it is abducting. If something is abducting and cumbrous then it is untaped. Red things are glary. If Phillie is abducting and Phillie is untaped then Phillie is glary. Phillie is glary.", "logic": "\nGlary(myron)\nCumbrous(myron)\nMineral(myron)\nAbducting(myron)\nCumbrous(whitman)\nPricey(whitman)\nMineral(whitman)\nAbducting(roslyn)\nUntaped(phillie)\nMineral(phillie)\nnot Cumbrous(whitman) -> not Mineral(whitman)\nforall x (Glary(x) and Pectoral(x) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Pricey(x) and not Pectoral(x) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Mineral(x) and Glary(x) -> Abducting(x))\nforall x (Untaped(x) and Pricey(x) -> Abducting(x))\nforall x (Abducting(x) and Cumbrous(x) -> Untaped(x))\nforall x (Pricey(x) -> Glary(x))\nAbducting(phillie) and Untaped(phillie) -> Glary(phillie)\n\nGlary(phillie)\n\nAbducting(phillie) and Untaped(phillie) -> Glary(phillie) <- forall x (Mineral(x) and Glary(x) -> Abducting(x)) <- forall x (Pricey(x) -> Glary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Franklyn is imputable. Franklyn is pricy. Franklyn is bonkers. Franklyn is dented. Giancarlo is pricy. Giancarlo is evacuant. Giancarlo is bonkers. Maritsa is dented. Danella is outside. Danella is bonkers. If Giancarlo is not pricy then Giancarlo is not bonkers. All imputable, helical things are bonkers. If something is evacuant and not helical then it is bonkers. If something is bonkers and imputable then it is dented. If something is outside and evacuant then it is dented. If something is dented and pricy then it is outside. Red things are imputable. If Danella is dented and Danella is outside then Danella is imputable. Danella is not dented.", "logic": "\nImputable(franklyn)\nPricy(franklyn)\nBonkers(franklyn)\nDented(franklyn)\nPricy(giancarlo)\nEvacuant(giancarlo)\nBonkers(giancarlo)\nDented(maritsa)\nOutside(danella)\nBonkers(danella)\nnot Pricy(giancarlo) -> not Bonkers(giancarlo)\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Helical(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) and not Helical(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) and Imputable(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Outside(x) and Evacuant(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) and Pricy(x) -> Outside(x))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) -> Imputable(x))\nDented(danella) and Outside(danella) -> Imputable(danella)\n\nnot Dented(danella)\n\nforall x (Bonkers(x) and Imputable(x) -> Dented(x)) <- Dented(danella) and Outside(danella) -> Imputable(danella) <- forall x (Outside(x) and Evacuant(x) -> Dented(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Tremayne is erythroid. Tremayne is ensuing. Tremayne is ferrous. Tremayne is voguish. Junina is ensuing. Junina is elvish. Junina is ferrous. Hestia is voguish. Anjanette is downhill. Anjanette is ferrous. If Junina is not ensuing then Junina is not ferrous. All erythroid, uveal things are ferrous. If something is elvish and not uveal then it is ferrous. If something is ferrous and erythroid then it is voguish. If something is downhill and elvish then it is voguish. If something is voguish and ensuing then it is downhill. Red things are erythroid. If Anjanette is voguish and Anjanette is downhill then Anjanette is erythroid. Hestia is ferrous.", "logic": "\nErythroid(tremayne)\nEnsuing(tremayne)\nFerrous(tremayne)\nVoguish(tremayne)\nEnsuing(junina)\nElvish(junina)\nFerrous(junina)\nVoguish(hestia)\nDownhill(anjanette)\nFerrous(anjanette)\nnot Ensuing(junina) -> not Ferrous(junina)\nforall x (Erythroid(x) and Uveal(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Elvish(x) and not Uveal(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) and Erythroid(x) -> Voguish(x))\nforall x (Downhill(x) and Elvish(x) -> Voguish(x))\nforall x (Voguish(x) and Ensuing(x) -> Downhill(x))\nforall x (Elvish(x) -> Erythroid(x))\nVoguish(anjanette) and Downhill(anjanette) -> Erythroid(anjanette)\n\nFerrous(hestia)\n\nforall x (Erythroid(x) and Uveal(x) -> Ferrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Britta is octangular. Britta is residuary. Britta is propitious. Britta is scrupulous. Jacques is residuary. Jacques is cosher. Jacques is propitious. Raphael is scrupulous. Fleurette is rimy. Fleurette is propitious. If Jacques is not residuary then Jacques is not propitious. All octangular, gothic things are propitious. If something is cosher and not gothic then it is propitious. If something is propitious and octangular then it is scrupulous. If something is rimy and cosher then it is scrupulous. If something is scrupulous and residuary then it is rimy. Red things are octangular. If Fleurette is scrupulous and Fleurette is rimy then Fleurette is octangular. Raphael is not gothic.", "logic": "\nOctangular(britta)\nResiduary(britta)\nPropitious(britta)\nScrupulous(britta)\nResiduary(jacques)\nCosher(jacques)\nPropitious(jacques)\nScrupulous(raphael)\nRimy(fleurette)\nPropitious(fleurette)\nnot Residuary(jacques) -> not Propitious(jacques)\nforall x (Octangular(x) and Gothic(x) -> Propitious(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) and not Gothic(x) -> Propitious(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) and Octangular(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Rimy(x) and Cosher(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Residuary(x) -> Rimy(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> Octangular(x))\nScrupulous(fleurette) and Rimy(fleurette) -> Octangular(fleurette)\n\nnot Gothic(raphael)\n\nnot Gothic(raphael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Gizela is unrelated. Gizela is roofed. Gizela is panicky. Gizela is periwigged. Hebert is roofed. Hebert is lexical. Hebert is panicky. Dionysus is periwigged. Anselma is rusty. Anselma is panicky. If Hebert is not roofed then Hebert is not panicky. All unrelated, countable things are panicky. If something is lexical and not countable then it is panicky. If something is panicky and unrelated then it is periwigged. If something is rusty and lexical then it is periwigged. If something is periwigged and roofed then it is rusty. Red things are unrelated. If Anselma is periwigged and Anselma is rusty then Anselma is unrelated. Gizela is lexical.", "logic": "\nUnrelated(gizela)\nRoofed(gizela)\nPanicky(gizela)\nPeriwigged(gizela)\nRoofed(hebert)\nLexical(hebert)\nPanicky(hebert)\nPeriwigged(dionysus)\nRusty(anselma)\nPanicky(anselma)\nnot Roofed(hebert) -> not Panicky(hebert)\nforall x (Unrelated(x) and Countable(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) and not Countable(x) -> Panicky(x))\nforall x (Panicky(x) and Unrelated(x) -> Periwigged(x))\nforall x (Rusty(x) and Lexical(x) -> Periwigged(x))\nforall x (Periwigged(x) and Roofed(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) -> Unrelated(x))\nPeriwigged(anselma) and Rusty(anselma) -> Unrelated(anselma)\n\nLexical(gizela)\n\nLexical(gizela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Filmore is myriad. Filmore is immutable. Filmore is bounderish. Filmore is stoical. Marysa is immutable. Marysa is candescent. Marysa is bounderish. Glynda is stoical. Sinclare is appalling. Sinclare is bounderish. If Marysa is not immutable then Marysa is not bounderish. All myriad, tricolor things are bounderish. If something is candescent and not tricolor then it is bounderish. If something is bounderish and myriad then it is stoical. If something is appalling and candescent then it is stoical. If something is stoical and immutable then it is appalling. Red things are myriad. If Sinclare is stoical and Sinclare is appalling then Sinclare is myriad. Marysa is not tricolor.", "logic": "\nMyriad(filmore)\nImmutable(filmore)\nBounderish(filmore)\nStoical(filmore)\nImmutable(marysa)\nCandescent(marysa)\nBounderish(marysa)\nStoical(glynda)\nAppalling(sinclare)\nBounderish(sinclare)\nnot Immutable(marysa) -> not Bounderish(marysa)\nforall x (Myriad(x) and Tricolor(x) -> Bounderish(x))\nforall x (Candescent(x) and not Tricolor(x) -> Bounderish(x))\nforall x (Bounderish(x) and Myriad(x) -> Stoical(x))\nforall x (Appalling(x) and Candescent(x) -> Stoical(x))\nforall x (Stoical(x) and Immutable(x) -> Appalling(x))\nforall x (Candescent(x) -> Myriad(x))\nStoical(sinclare) and Appalling(sinclare) -> Myriad(sinclare)\n\nnot Tricolor(marysa)\n\nnot Tricolor(marysa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Danila is cockney. Danila is piffling. Danila is demotic. Danila is tameable. Alaine is piffling. Alaine is sensual. Alaine is demotic. Shelton is tameable. Annabel is polemical. Annabel is demotic. If Alaine is not piffling then Alaine is not demotic. All cockney, shut things are demotic. If something is sensual and not shut then it is demotic. If something is demotic and cockney then it is tameable. If something is polemical and sensual then it is tameable. If something is tameable and piffling then it is polemical. Red things are cockney. If Annabel is tameable and Annabel is polemical then Annabel is cockney. Annabel is piffling.", "logic": "\nCockney(danila)\nPiffling(danila)\nDemotic(danila)\nTameable(danila)\nPiffling(alaine)\nSensual(alaine)\nDemotic(alaine)\nTameable(shelton)\nPolemical(annabel)\nDemotic(annabel)\nnot Piffling(alaine) -> not Demotic(alaine)\nforall x (Cockney(x) and Shut(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Sensual(x) and not Shut(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Demotic(x) and Cockney(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Polemical(x) and Sensual(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Tameable(x) and Piffling(x) -> Polemical(x))\nforall x (Sensual(x) -> Cockney(x))\nTameable(annabel) and Polemical(annabel) -> Cockney(annabel)\n\nPiffling(annabel)\n\nPiffling(annabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "The joannes ankylose the orrin. The joannes ankylose the kingsly. The joannes is protected. The joannes reorganize the kingsly. The joannes obsess the orrin. The morty is protected. The morty reorganize the joannes. The morty reorganize the kingsly. The orrin ankylose the kingsly. The orrin reorganize the morty. The orrin obsess the morty. The kingsly ankylose the morty. The kingsly ankylose the orrin. The kingsly is protected. The kingsly is oafish. The kingsly reorganize the joannes. If someone obsess the orrin and the orrin is threescore then the orrin reorganize the morty. If someone reorganize the orrin then they are transonic. All transonic people are protected. If someone is boughten and they eat the kingsly then they need the joannes. If someone reorganize the orrin and they are boughten then they visit the morty. If someone obsess the morty then they need the orrin. The morty is protected.", "logic": "\nAnkylose(joannes, orrin)\nAnkylose(joannes, kingsly)\nProtected(joannes)\nReorganize(joannes, kingsly)\nObsess(joannes, orrin)\nProtected(morty)\nReorganize(morty, joannes)\nReorganize(morty, kingsly)\nAnkylose(orrin, kingsly)\nReorganize(orrin, morty)\nObsess(orrin, morty)\nAnkylose(kingsly, morty)\nAnkylose(kingsly, orrin)\nProtected(kingsly)\nOafish(kingsly)\nReorganize(kingsly, joannes)\nforall x (Obsess(x, orrin) and Threescore(orrin) -> Reorganize(orrin, morty))\nforall x (Reorganize(x, orrin) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Protected(x))\nforall x (Boughten(x) and Ankylose(x, kingsly) -> Reorganize(x, joannes))\nforall x (Reorganize(x, orrin) and Boughten(x) -> Obsess(x, morty))\nforall x (Obsess(x, morty) -> Reorganize(x, orrin))\n\nProtected(morty)\n\ntherefore Protected(morty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The flora maroon the willmott. The flora maroon the seana. The flora is tasmanian. The flora slenderize the seana. The flora blub the willmott. The odetta is tasmanian. The odetta slenderize the flora. The odetta slenderize the seana. The willmott maroon the seana. The willmott slenderize the odetta. The willmott blub the odetta. The seana maroon the odetta. The seana maroon the willmott. The seana is tasmanian. The seana is arduous. The seana slenderize the flora. If someone blub the willmott and the willmott is cyprinoid then the willmott slenderize the odetta. If someone slenderize the willmott then they are logical. All logical people are tasmanian. If someone is moslem and they eat the seana then they need the flora. If someone slenderize the willmott and they are moslem then they visit the odetta. If someone blub the odetta then they need the willmott. The seana is not arduous.", "logic": "\nMaroon(flora, willmott)\nMaroon(flora, seana)\nTasmanian(flora)\nSlenderize(flora, seana)\nBlub(flora, willmott)\nTasmanian(odetta)\nSlenderize(odetta, flora)\nSlenderize(odetta, seana)\nMaroon(willmott, seana)\nSlenderize(willmott, odetta)\nBlub(willmott, odetta)\nMaroon(seana, odetta)\nMaroon(seana, willmott)\nTasmanian(seana)\nArduous(seana)\nSlenderize(seana, flora)\nforall x (Blub(x, willmott) and Cyprinoid(willmott) -> Slenderize(willmott, odetta))\nforall x (Slenderize(x, willmott) -> Logical(x))\nforall x (Logical(x) -> Tasmanian(x))\nforall x (Moslem(x) and Maroon(x, seana) -> Slenderize(x, flora))\nforall x (Slenderize(x, willmott) and Moslem(x) -> Blub(x, odetta))\nforall x (Blub(x, odetta) -> Slenderize(x, willmott))\n\nnot Arduous(seana)\n\ntherefore Arduous(seana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The abbott economize the ivett. The abbott economize the teddie. The abbott is bifurcated. The abbott demonetize the teddie. The abbott feud the ivett. The catherina is bifurcated. The catherina demonetize the abbott. The catherina demonetize the teddie. The ivett economize the teddie. The ivett demonetize the catherina. The ivett feud the catherina. The teddie economize the catherina. The teddie economize the ivett. The teddie is bifurcated. The teddie is shed. The teddie demonetize the abbott. If someone feud the ivett and the ivett is exegetical then the ivett demonetize the catherina. If someone demonetize the ivett then they are dendritic. All dendritic people are bifurcated. If someone is fake and they eat the teddie then they need the abbott. If someone demonetize the ivett and they are fake then they visit the catherina. If someone feud the catherina then they need the ivett. The ivett demonetize the ivett.", "logic": "\nEconomize(abbott, ivett)\nEconomize(abbott, teddie)\nBifurcated(abbott)\nDemonetize(abbott, teddie)\nFeud(abbott, ivett)\nBifurcated(catherina)\nDemonetize(catherina, abbott)\nDemonetize(catherina, teddie)\nEconomize(ivett, teddie)\nDemonetize(ivett, catherina)\nFeud(ivett, catherina)\nEconomize(teddie, catherina)\nEconomize(teddie, ivett)\nBifurcated(teddie)\nShed(teddie)\nDemonetize(teddie, abbott)\nforall x (Feud(x, ivett) and Exegetical(ivett) -> Demonetize(ivett, catherina))\nforall x (Demonetize(x, ivett) -> Dendritic(x))\nforall x (Dendritic(x) -> Bifurcated(x))\nforall x (Fake(x) and Economize(x, teddie) -> Demonetize(x, abbott))\nforall x (Demonetize(x, ivett) and Fake(x) -> Feud(x, catherina))\nforall x (Feud(x, catherina) -> Demonetize(x, ivett))\n\nDemonetize(ivett, ivett)\n\nFeud(ivett, catherina) and forall x (Feud(x, catherina) -> Demonetize(x, ivett)) -> therefore Demonetize(ivett, ivett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The phaedra warble the anya. The phaedra warble the tania. The phaedra is crazed. The phaedra force the tania. The phaedra haunt the anya. The lilian is crazed. The lilian force the phaedra. The lilian force the tania. The anya warble the tania. The anya force the lilian. The anya haunt the lilian. The tania warble the lilian. The tania warble the anya. The tania is crazed. The tania is menopausal. The tania force the phaedra. If someone haunt the anya and the anya is disordered then the anya force the lilian. If someone force the anya then they are untrodden. All untrodden people are crazed. If someone is zero and they eat the tania then they need the phaedra. If someone force the anya and they are zero then they visit the lilian. If someone haunt the lilian then they need the anya. The anya does not need the anya.", "logic": "\nWarble(phaedra, anya)\nWarble(phaedra, tania)\nCrazed(phaedra)\nForce(phaedra, tania)\nHaunt(phaedra, anya)\nCrazed(lilian)\nForce(lilian, phaedra)\nForce(lilian, tania)\nWarble(anya, tania)\nForce(anya, lilian)\nHaunt(anya, lilian)\nWarble(tania, lilian)\nWarble(tania, anya)\nCrazed(tania)\nMenopausal(tania)\nForce(tania, phaedra)\nforall x (Haunt(x, anya) and Disordered(anya) -> Force(anya, lilian))\nforall x (Force(x, anya) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Untrodden(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Zero(x) and Warble(x, tania) -> Force(x, phaedra))\nforall x (Force(x, anya) and Zero(x) -> Haunt(x, lilian))\nforall x (Haunt(x, lilian) -> Force(x, anya))\n\nnot Force(anya, anya)\n\nHaunt(anya, lilian) and forall x (Haunt(x, lilian) -> Force(x, anya)) -> therefore Force(anya, anya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The lynsey eclipse the marcelle. The lynsey eclipse the joanie. The lynsey is vinous. The lynsey reprieve the joanie. The lynsey berry the marcelle. The bishop is vinous. The bishop reprieve the lynsey. The bishop reprieve the joanie. The marcelle eclipse the joanie. The marcelle reprieve the bishop. The marcelle berry the bishop. The joanie eclipse the bishop. The joanie eclipse the marcelle. The joanie is vinous. The joanie is amphibian. The joanie reprieve the lynsey. If someone berry the marcelle and the marcelle is bouncy then the marcelle reprieve the bishop. If someone reprieve the marcelle then they are rewarding. All rewarding people are vinous. If someone is untrod and they eat the joanie then they need the lynsey. If someone reprieve the marcelle and they are untrod then they visit the bishop. If someone berry the bishop then they need the marcelle. The marcelle is rewarding.", "logic": "\nEclipse(lynsey, marcelle)\nEclipse(lynsey, joanie)\nVinous(lynsey)\nReprieve(lynsey, joanie)\nBerry(lynsey, marcelle)\nVinous(bishop)\nReprieve(bishop, lynsey)\nReprieve(bishop, joanie)\nEclipse(marcelle, joanie)\nReprieve(marcelle, bishop)\nBerry(marcelle, bishop)\nEclipse(joanie, bishop)\nEclipse(joanie, marcelle)\nVinous(joanie)\nAmphibian(joanie)\nReprieve(joanie, lynsey)\nforall x (Berry(x, marcelle) and Bouncy(marcelle) -> Reprieve(marcelle, bishop))\nforall x (Reprieve(x, marcelle) -> Rewarding(x))\nforall x (Rewarding(x) -> Vinous(x))\nforall x (Untrod(x) and Eclipse(x, joanie) -> Reprieve(x, lynsey))\nforall x (Reprieve(x, marcelle) and Untrod(x) -> Berry(x, bishop))\nforall x (Berry(x, bishop) -> Reprieve(x, marcelle))\n\nRewarding(marcelle)\n\nBerry(marcelle, bishop) and forall x (Berry(x, bishop) -> Reprieve(x, marcelle)) -> therefore Reprieve(marcelle, marcelle) Reprieve(marcelle, marcelle) and forall x (Reprieve(x, marcelle) -> Rewarding(x)) -> therefore Rewarding(marcelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The krishna corbel the carmelita. The krishna corbel the lizabeth. The krishna is capsular. The krishna inculpate the lizabeth. The krishna wane the carmelita. The janie is capsular. The janie inculpate the krishna. The janie inculpate the lizabeth. The carmelita corbel the lizabeth. The carmelita inculpate the janie. The carmelita wane the janie. The lizabeth corbel the janie. The lizabeth corbel the carmelita. The lizabeth is capsular. The lizabeth is abashed. The lizabeth inculpate the krishna. If someone wane the carmelita and the carmelita is discharged then the carmelita inculpate the janie. If someone inculpate the carmelita then they are august. All august people are capsular. If someone is select and they eat the lizabeth then they need the krishna. If someone inculpate the carmelita and they are select then they visit the janie. If someone wane the janie then they need the carmelita. The carmelita is not august.", "logic": "\nCorbel(krishna, carmelita)\nCorbel(krishna, lizabeth)\nCapsular(krishna)\nInculpate(krishna, lizabeth)\nWane(krishna, carmelita)\nCapsular(janie)\nInculpate(janie, krishna)\nInculpate(janie, lizabeth)\nCorbel(carmelita, lizabeth)\nInculpate(carmelita, janie)\nWane(carmelita, janie)\nCorbel(lizabeth, janie)\nCorbel(lizabeth, carmelita)\nCapsular(lizabeth)\nAbashed(lizabeth)\nInculpate(lizabeth, krishna)\nforall x (Wane(x, carmelita) and Discharged(carmelita) -> Inculpate(carmelita, janie))\nforall x (Inculpate(x, carmelita) -> August(x))\nforall x (August(x) -> Capsular(x))\nforall x (Select(x) and Corbel(x, lizabeth) -> Inculpate(x, krishna))\nforall x (Inculpate(x, carmelita) and Select(x) -> Wane(x, janie))\nforall x (Wane(x, janie) -> Inculpate(x, carmelita))\n\nnot August(carmelita)\n\nWane(carmelita, janie) and forall x (Wane(x, janie) -> Inculpate(x, carmelita)) -> therefore Inculpate(carmelita, carmelita) Inculpate(carmelita, carmelita) and forall x (Inculpate(x, carmelita) -> August(x)) -> therefore August(carmelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The binnie spread the jessika. The binnie spread the carlen. The binnie is exploded. The binnie disinter the carlen. The binnie concrete the jessika. The pris is exploded. The pris disinter the binnie. The pris disinter the carlen. The jessika spread the carlen. The jessika disinter the pris. The jessika concrete the pris. The carlen spread the pris. The carlen spread the jessika. The carlen is exploded. The carlen is bobtailed. The carlen disinter the binnie. If someone concrete the jessika and the jessika is uncarpeted then the jessika disinter the pris. If someone disinter the jessika then they are amphibian. All amphibian people are exploded. If someone is phonetic and they eat the carlen then they need the binnie. If someone disinter the jessika and they are phonetic then they visit the pris. If someone concrete the pris then they need the jessika. The jessika is exploded.", "logic": "\nSpread(binnie, jessika)\nSpread(binnie, carlen)\nExploded(binnie)\nDisinter(binnie, carlen)\nConcrete(binnie, jessika)\nExploded(pris)\nDisinter(pris, binnie)\nDisinter(pris, carlen)\nSpread(jessika, carlen)\nDisinter(jessika, pris)\nConcrete(jessika, pris)\nSpread(carlen, pris)\nSpread(carlen, jessika)\nExploded(carlen)\nBobtailed(carlen)\nDisinter(carlen, binnie)\nforall x (Concrete(x, jessika) and Uncarpeted(jessika) -> Disinter(jessika, pris))\nforall x (Disinter(x, jessika) -> Amphibian(x))\nforall x (Amphibian(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Phonetic(x) and Spread(x, carlen) -> Disinter(x, binnie))\nforall x (Disinter(x, jessika) and Phonetic(x) -> Concrete(x, pris))\nforall x (Concrete(x, pris) -> Disinter(x, jessika))\n\nExploded(jessika)\n\nConcrete(jessika, pris) and forall x (Concrete(x, pris) -> Disinter(x, jessika)) -> therefore Disinter(jessika, jessika) Disinter(jessika, jessika) and forall x (Disinter(x, jessika) -> Amphibian(x)) -> therefore Amphibian(jessika) Amphibian(jessika) and forall x (Amphibian(x) -> Exploded(x)) -> therefore Exploded(jessika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The anatollo garotte the kaari. The anatollo garotte the friedrick. The anatollo is sheetlike. The anatollo integrate the friedrick. The anatollo jeopardise the kaari. The erika is sheetlike. The erika integrate the anatollo. The erika integrate the friedrick. The kaari garotte the friedrick. The kaari integrate the erika. The kaari jeopardise the erika. The friedrick garotte the erika. The friedrick garotte the kaari. The friedrick is sheetlike. The friedrick is sixth. The friedrick integrate the anatollo. If someone jeopardise the kaari and the kaari is scarred then the kaari integrate the erika. If someone integrate the kaari then they are russian. All russian people are sheetlike. If someone is downright and they eat the friedrick then they need the anatollo. If someone integrate the kaari and they are downright then they visit the erika. If someone jeopardise the erika then they need the kaari. The kaari is not sheetlike.", "logic": "\nGarotte(anatollo, kaari)\nGarotte(anatollo, friedrick)\nSheetlike(anatollo)\nIntegrate(anatollo, friedrick)\nJeopardise(anatollo, kaari)\nSheetlike(erika)\nIntegrate(erika, anatollo)\nIntegrate(erika, friedrick)\nGarotte(kaari, friedrick)\nIntegrate(kaari, erika)\nJeopardise(kaari, erika)\nGarotte(friedrick, erika)\nGarotte(friedrick, kaari)\nSheetlike(friedrick)\nSixth(friedrick)\nIntegrate(friedrick, anatollo)\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, kaari) and Scarred(kaari) -> Integrate(kaari, erika))\nforall x (Integrate(x, kaari) -> Russian(x))\nforall x (Russian(x) -> Sheetlike(x))\nforall x (Downright(x) and Garotte(x, friedrick) -> Integrate(x, anatollo))\nforall x (Integrate(x, kaari) and Downright(x) -> Jeopardise(x, erika))\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, erika) -> Integrate(x, kaari))\n\nnot Sheetlike(kaari)\n\nJeopardise(kaari, erika) and forall x (Jeopardise(x, erika) -> Integrate(x, kaari)) -> therefore Integrate(kaari, kaari) Integrate(kaari, kaari) and forall x (Integrate(x, kaari) -> Russian(x)) -> therefore Russian(kaari) Russian(kaari) and forall x (Russian(x) -> Sheetlike(x)) -> therefore Sheetlike(kaari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The franciska diagram the hallam. The franciska diagram the heinz. The franciska is branchiate. The franciska tube the heinz. The franciska pommel the hallam. The shalne is branchiate. The shalne tube the franciska. The shalne tube the heinz. The hallam diagram the heinz. The hallam tube the shalne. The hallam pommel the shalne. The heinz diagram the shalne. The heinz diagram the hallam. The heinz is branchiate. The heinz is thirteenth. The heinz tube the franciska. If someone pommel the hallam and the hallam is shady then the hallam tube the shalne. If someone tube the hallam then they are parhelic. All parhelic people are branchiate. If someone is organismic and they eat the heinz then they need the franciska. If someone tube the hallam and they are organismic then they visit the shalne. If someone pommel the shalne then they need the hallam. The franciska does not visit the shalne.", "logic": "\nDiagram(franciska, hallam)\nDiagram(franciska, heinz)\nBranchiate(franciska)\nTube(franciska, heinz)\nPommel(franciska, hallam)\nBranchiate(shalne)\nTube(shalne, franciska)\nTube(shalne, heinz)\nDiagram(hallam, heinz)\nTube(hallam, shalne)\nPommel(hallam, shalne)\nDiagram(heinz, shalne)\nDiagram(heinz, hallam)\nBranchiate(heinz)\nThirteenth(heinz)\nTube(heinz, franciska)\nforall x (Pommel(x, hallam) and Shady(hallam) -> Tube(hallam, shalne))\nforall x (Tube(x, hallam) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (Parhelic(x) -> Branchiate(x))\nforall x (Organismic(x) and Diagram(x, heinz) -> Tube(x, franciska))\nforall x (Tube(x, hallam) and Organismic(x) -> Pommel(x, shalne))\nforall x (Pommel(x, shalne) -> Tube(x, hallam))\n\nnot Pommel(franciska, shalne)\n\nforall x (Tube(x, hallam) and Organismic(x) -> Pommel(x, shalne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The georgena scollop the ramona. The georgena scollop the carena. The georgena is buttonlike. The georgena anatomise the carena. The georgena overarch the ramona. The corrie is buttonlike. The corrie anatomise the georgena. The corrie anatomise the carena. The ramona scollop the carena. The ramona anatomise the corrie. The ramona overarch the corrie. The carena scollop the corrie. The carena scollop the ramona. The carena is buttonlike. The carena is guyanese. The carena anatomise the georgena. If someone overarch the ramona and the ramona is painless then the ramona anatomise the corrie. If someone anatomise the ramona then they are animistic. All animistic people are buttonlike. If someone is busybodied and they eat the carena then they need the georgena. If someone anatomise the ramona and they are busybodied then they visit the corrie. If someone overarch the corrie then they need the ramona. The georgena anatomise the ramona.", "logic": "\nScollop(georgena, ramona)\nScollop(georgena, carena)\nButtonlike(georgena)\nAnatomise(georgena, carena)\nOverarch(georgena, ramona)\nButtonlike(corrie)\nAnatomise(corrie, georgena)\nAnatomise(corrie, carena)\nScollop(ramona, carena)\nAnatomise(ramona, corrie)\nOverarch(ramona, corrie)\nScollop(carena, corrie)\nScollop(carena, ramona)\nButtonlike(carena)\nGuyanese(carena)\nAnatomise(carena, georgena)\nforall x (Overarch(x, ramona) and Painless(ramona) -> Anatomise(ramona, corrie))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, ramona) -> Animistic(x))\nforall x (Animistic(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) and Scollop(x, carena) -> Anatomise(x, georgena))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, ramona) and Busybodied(x) -> Overarch(x, corrie))\nforall x (Overarch(x, corrie) -> Anatomise(x, ramona))\n\nAnatomise(georgena, ramona)\n\nforall x (Overarch(x, corrie) -> Anatomise(x, ramona)) <- forall x (Anatomise(x, ramona) and Busybodied(x) -> Overarch(x, corrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The zebulen spook the norri. The zebulen spook the britaney. The zebulen is peppery. The zebulen wend the britaney. The zebulen allegorize the norri. The webster is peppery. The webster wend the zebulen. The webster wend the britaney. The norri spook the britaney. The norri wend the webster. The norri allegorize the webster. The britaney spook the webster. The britaney spook the norri. The britaney is peppery. The britaney is patented. The britaney wend the zebulen. If someone allegorize the norri and the norri is cockamamie then the norri wend the webster. If someone wend the norri then they are slapstick. All slapstick people are peppery. If someone is fallible and they eat the britaney then they need the zebulen. If someone wend the norri and they are fallible then they visit the webster. If someone allegorize the webster then they need the norri. The webster does not need the norri.", "logic": "\nSpook(zebulen, norri)\nSpook(zebulen, britaney)\nPeppery(zebulen)\nWend(zebulen, britaney)\nAllegorize(zebulen, norri)\nPeppery(webster)\nWend(webster, zebulen)\nWend(webster, britaney)\nSpook(norri, britaney)\nWend(norri, webster)\nAllegorize(norri, webster)\nSpook(britaney, webster)\nSpook(britaney, norri)\nPeppery(britaney)\nPatented(britaney)\nWend(britaney, zebulen)\nforall x (Allegorize(x, norri) and Cockamamie(norri) -> Wend(norri, webster))\nforall x (Wend(x, norri) -> Slapstick(x))\nforall x (Slapstick(x) -> Peppery(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Spook(x, britaney) -> Wend(x, zebulen))\nforall x (Wend(x, norri) and Fallible(x) -> Allegorize(x, webster))\nforall x (Allegorize(x, webster) -> Wend(x, norri))\n\nnot Wend(webster, norri)\n\nforall x (Allegorize(x, webster) -> Wend(x, norri)) <- forall x (Wend(x, norri) and Fallible(x) -> Allegorize(x, webster)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The missie sliver the jesselyn. The missie sliver the sayers. The missie is enlarged. The missie buffer the sayers. The missie glimmer the jesselyn. The abdul is enlarged. The abdul buffer the missie. The abdul buffer the sayers. The jesselyn sliver the sayers. The jesselyn buffer the abdul. The jesselyn glimmer the abdul. The sayers sliver the abdul. The sayers sliver the jesselyn. The sayers is enlarged. The sayers is stacked. The sayers buffer the missie. If someone glimmer the jesselyn and the jesselyn is sleepless then the jesselyn buffer the abdul. If someone buffer the jesselyn then they are cuneate. All cuneate people are enlarged. If someone is areolate and they eat the sayers then they need the missie. If someone buffer the jesselyn and they are areolate then they visit the abdul. If someone glimmer the abdul then they need the jesselyn. The abdul glimmer the abdul.", "logic": "\nSliver(missie, jesselyn)\nSliver(missie, sayers)\nEnlarged(missie)\nBuffer(missie, sayers)\nGlimmer(missie, jesselyn)\nEnlarged(abdul)\nBuffer(abdul, missie)\nBuffer(abdul, sayers)\nSliver(jesselyn, sayers)\nBuffer(jesselyn, abdul)\nGlimmer(jesselyn, abdul)\nSliver(sayers, abdul)\nSliver(sayers, jesselyn)\nEnlarged(sayers)\nStacked(sayers)\nBuffer(sayers, missie)\nforall x (Glimmer(x, jesselyn) and Sleepless(jesselyn) -> Buffer(jesselyn, abdul))\nforall x (Buffer(x, jesselyn) -> Cuneate(x))\nforall x (Cuneate(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nforall x (Areolate(x) and Sliver(x, sayers) -> Buffer(x, missie))\nforall x (Buffer(x, jesselyn) and Areolate(x) -> Glimmer(x, abdul))\nforall x (Glimmer(x, abdul) -> Buffer(x, jesselyn))\n\nGlimmer(abdul, abdul)\n\nforall x (Buffer(x, jesselyn) and Areolate(x) -> Glimmer(x, abdul)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The corrina hash the jorey. The corrina hash the christi. The corrina is hardheaded. The corrina revamp the christi. The corrina cost the jorey. The rayna is hardheaded. The rayna revamp the corrina. The rayna revamp the christi. The jorey hash the christi. The jorey revamp the rayna. The jorey cost the rayna. The christi hash the rayna. The christi hash the jorey. The christi is hardheaded. The christi is beheaded. The christi revamp the corrina. If someone cost the jorey and the jorey is ariled then the jorey revamp the rayna. If someone revamp the jorey then they are gainful. All gainful people are hardheaded. If someone is derivative and they eat the christi then they need the corrina. If someone revamp the jorey and they are derivative then they visit the rayna. If someone cost the rayna then they need the jorey. The jorey does not visit the jorey.", "logic": "\nHash(corrina, jorey)\nHash(corrina, christi)\nHardheaded(corrina)\nRevamp(corrina, christi)\nCost(corrina, jorey)\nHardheaded(rayna)\nRevamp(rayna, corrina)\nRevamp(rayna, christi)\nHash(jorey, christi)\nRevamp(jorey, rayna)\nCost(jorey, rayna)\nHash(christi, rayna)\nHash(christi, jorey)\nHardheaded(christi)\nBeheaded(christi)\nRevamp(christi, corrina)\nforall x (Cost(x, jorey) and Ariled(jorey) -> Revamp(jorey, rayna))\nforall x (Revamp(x, jorey) -> Gainful(x))\nforall x (Gainful(x) -> Hardheaded(x))\nforall x (Derivative(x) and Hash(x, christi) -> Revamp(x, corrina))\nforall x (Revamp(x, jorey) and Derivative(x) -> Cost(x, rayna))\nforall x (Cost(x, rayna) -> Revamp(x, jorey))\n\nnot Cost(jorey, jorey)\n\nnot Cost(jorey, jorey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The gav larn the carry. The gav larn the juliane. The gav is bias. The gav reword the juliane. The gav pass the carry. The sybilla is bias. The sybilla reword the gav. The sybilla reword the juliane. The carry larn the juliane. The carry reword the sybilla. The carry pass the sybilla. The juliane larn the sybilla. The juliane larn the carry. The juliane is bias. The juliane is nagging. The juliane reword the gav. If someone pass the carry and the carry is talkative then the carry reword the sybilla. If someone reword the carry then they are sevenfold. All sevenfold people are bias. If someone is uneasy and they eat the juliane then they need the gav. If someone reword the carry and they are uneasy then they visit the sybilla. If someone pass the sybilla then they need the carry. The juliane reword the sybilla.", "logic": "\nLarn(gav, carry)\nLarn(gav, juliane)\nBias(gav)\nReword(gav, juliane)\nPass(gav, carry)\nBias(sybilla)\nReword(sybilla, gav)\nReword(sybilla, juliane)\nLarn(carry, juliane)\nReword(carry, sybilla)\nPass(carry, sybilla)\nLarn(juliane, sybilla)\nLarn(juliane, carry)\nBias(juliane)\nNagging(juliane)\nReword(juliane, gav)\nforall x (Pass(x, carry) and Talkative(carry) -> Reword(carry, sybilla))\nforall x (Reword(x, carry) -> Sevenfold(x))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) and Larn(x, juliane) -> Reword(x, gav))\nforall x (Reword(x, carry) and Uneasy(x) -> Pass(x, sybilla))\nforall x (Pass(x, sybilla) -> Reword(x, carry))\n\nReword(juliane, sybilla)\n\nReword(juliane, sybilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The vivianna wawl the shara. The vivianna wawl the westley. The vivianna is anterior. The vivianna iodinate the westley. The vivianna platinize the shara. The therine is anterior. The therine iodinate the vivianna. The therine iodinate the westley. The shara wawl the westley. The shara iodinate the therine. The shara platinize the therine. The westley wawl the therine. The westley wawl the shara. The westley is anterior. The westley is lunatic. The westley iodinate the vivianna. If someone platinize the shara and the shara is honeyed then the shara iodinate the therine. If someone iodinate the shara then they are twinned. All twinned people are anterior. If someone is reptilian and they eat the westley then they need the vivianna. If someone iodinate the shara and they are reptilian then they visit the therine. If someone platinize the therine then they need the shara. The therine does not eat the vivianna.", "logic": "\nWawl(vivianna, shara)\nWawl(vivianna, westley)\nAnterior(vivianna)\nIodinate(vivianna, westley)\nPlatinize(vivianna, shara)\nAnterior(therine)\nIodinate(therine, vivianna)\nIodinate(therine, westley)\nWawl(shara, westley)\nIodinate(shara, therine)\nPlatinize(shara, therine)\nWawl(westley, therine)\nWawl(westley, shara)\nAnterior(westley)\nLunatic(westley)\nIodinate(westley, vivianna)\nforall x (Platinize(x, shara) and Honeyed(shara) -> Iodinate(shara, therine))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, shara) -> Twinned(x))\nforall x (Twinned(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Reptilian(x) and Wawl(x, westley) -> Iodinate(x, vivianna))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, shara) and Reptilian(x) -> Platinize(x, therine))\nforall x (Platinize(x, therine) -> Iodinate(x, shara))\n\nnot Wawl(therine, vivianna)\n\nnot Wawl(therine, vivianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The barclay straddle the hymie. The barclay straddle the tamarra. The barclay is downhill. The barclay padlock the tamarra. The barclay unspell the hymie. The arlyne is downhill. The arlyne padlock the barclay. The arlyne padlock the tamarra. The hymie straddle the tamarra. The hymie padlock the arlyne. The hymie unspell the arlyne. The tamarra straddle the arlyne. The tamarra straddle the hymie. The tamarra is downhill. The tamarra is clamorous. The tamarra padlock the barclay. If someone unspell the hymie and the hymie is stateless then the hymie padlock the arlyne. If someone padlock the hymie then they are liveborn. All liveborn people are downhill. If someone is umber and they eat the tamarra then they need the barclay. If someone padlock the hymie and they are umber then they visit the arlyne. If someone unspell the arlyne then they need the hymie. The barclay straddle the barclay.", "logic": "\nStraddle(barclay, hymie)\nStraddle(barclay, tamarra)\nDownhill(barclay)\nPadlock(barclay, tamarra)\nUnspell(barclay, hymie)\nDownhill(arlyne)\nPadlock(arlyne, barclay)\nPadlock(arlyne, tamarra)\nStraddle(hymie, tamarra)\nPadlock(hymie, arlyne)\nUnspell(hymie, arlyne)\nStraddle(tamarra, arlyne)\nStraddle(tamarra, hymie)\nDownhill(tamarra)\nClamorous(tamarra)\nPadlock(tamarra, barclay)\nforall x (Unspell(x, hymie) and Stateless(hymie) -> Padlock(hymie, arlyne))\nforall x (Padlock(x, hymie) -> Liveborn(x))\nforall x (Liveborn(x) -> Downhill(x))\nforall x (Umber(x) and Straddle(x, tamarra) -> Padlock(x, barclay))\nforall x (Padlock(x, hymie) and Umber(x) -> Unspell(x, arlyne))\nforall x (Unspell(x, arlyne) -> Padlock(x, hymie))\n\nStraddle(barclay, barclay)\n\nStraddle(barclay, barclay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-680"} {"premises": "The reese is laryngeal. The reese is not touched. The linda does not like the reese. The linda force the reese. The linda force the albatros. The amalea force the reese. The albatros dateline the amalea. If something dateline the albatros and it does not see the albatros then it force the amalea. If something force the reese then the reese dateline the amalea. If something force the linda then it involve the amalea. If something dateline the amalea then it dateline the linda. If something is touched and it does not see the albatros then it does not visit the albatros. If something dateline the amalea then it does not like the albatros. If the linda dateline the amalea and the amalea is astronomic then the linda is not demonic. If something dateline the linda then the linda is laryngeal. The reese is laryngeal.", "logic": "\nLaryngeal(reese)\nnot Touched(reese)\nnot Involve(linda, reese)\nForce(linda, reese)\nForce(linda, albatros)\nForce(amalea, reese)\nDateline(albatros, amalea)\nforall x (Dateline(x, albatros) and not Force(x, albatros) -> Force(x, amalea))\nforall x (Force(x, reese) -> Dateline(reese, amalea))\nforall x (Force(x, linda) -> Involve(x, amalea))\nforall x (Dateline(x, amalea) -> Dateline(x, linda))\nforall x (Touched(x) and not Force(x, albatros) -> not Dateline(x, albatros))\nforall x (Dateline(x, amalea) -> not Involve(x, albatros))\nDateline(linda, amalea) and Astronomic(amalea) -> not Demonic(linda)\nforall x (Dateline(x, linda) -> Laryngeal(linda))\n\nLaryngeal(reese)\n\ntherefore Laryngeal(reese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The maybelle is seemly. The maybelle is not bentonitic. The marice does not like the maybelle. The marice conglobe the maybelle. The marice conglobe the viola. The ilka conglobe the maybelle. The viola interlink the ilka. If something interlink the viola and it does not see the viola then it conglobe the ilka. If something conglobe the maybelle then the maybelle interlink the ilka. If something conglobe the marice then it underwrite the ilka. If something interlink the ilka then it interlink the marice. If something is bentonitic and it does not see the viola then it does not visit the viola. If something interlink the ilka then it does not like the viola. If the marice interlink the ilka and the ilka is solidified then the marice is not lean. If something interlink the marice then the marice is seemly. The marice does not see the maybelle.", "logic": "\nSeemly(maybelle)\nnot Bentonitic(maybelle)\nnot Underwrite(marice, maybelle)\nConglobe(marice, maybelle)\nConglobe(marice, viola)\nConglobe(ilka, maybelle)\nInterlink(viola, ilka)\nforall x (Interlink(x, viola) and not Conglobe(x, viola) -> Conglobe(x, ilka))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, maybelle) -> Interlink(maybelle, ilka))\nforall x (Conglobe(x, marice) -> Underwrite(x, ilka))\nforall x (Interlink(x, ilka) -> Interlink(x, marice))\nforall x (Bentonitic(x) and not Conglobe(x, viola) -> not Interlink(x, viola))\nforall x (Interlink(x, ilka) -> not Underwrite(x, viola))\nInterlink(marice, ilka) and Solidified(ilka) -> not Lean(marice)\nforall x (Interlink(x, marice) -> Seemly(marice))\n\nnot Conglobe(marice, maybelle)\n\ntherefore Conglobe(marice, maybelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The shawnee is whiney. The shawnee is not desultory. The benson does not like the shawnee. The benson immix the shawnee. The benson immix the alan. The harriot immix the shawnee. The alan negociate the harriot. If something negociate the alan and it does not see the alan then it immix the harriot. If something immix the shawnee then the shawnee negociate the harriot. If something immix the benson then it usher the harriot. If something negociate the harriot then it negociate the benson. If something is desultory and it does not see the alan then it does not visit the alan. If something negociate the harriot then it does not like the alan. If the benson negociate the harriot and the harriot is emeritus then the benson is not oleophobic. If something negociate the benson then the benson is whiney. The alan negociate the benson.", "logic": "\nWhiney(shawnee)\nnot Desultory(shawnee)\nnot Usher(benson, shawnee)\nImmix(benson, shawnee)\nImmix(benson, alan)\nImmix(harriot, shawnee)\nNegociate(alan, harriot)\nforall x (Negociate(x, alan) and not Immix(x, alan) -> Immix(x, harriot))\nforall x (Immix(x, shawnee) -> Negociate(shawnee, harriot))\nforall x (Immix(x, benson) -> Usher(x, harriot))\nforall x (Negociate(x, harriot) -> Negociate(x, benson))\nforall x (Desultory(x) and not Immix(x, alan) -> not Negociate(x, alan))\nforall x (Negociate(x, harriot) -> not Usher(x, alan))\nNegociate(benson, harriot) and Emeritus(harriot) -> not Oleophobic(benson)\nforall x (Negociate(x, benson) -> Whiney(benson))\n\nNegociate(alan, benson)\n\nNegociate(alan, harriot) and forall x (Negociate(x, harriot) -> Negociate(x, benson)) -> therefore Negociate(alan, benson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The somerset is acellular. The somerset is not shelled. The ventura does not like the somerset. The ventura annex the somerset. The ventura annex the midge. The marlee annex the somerset. The midge pule the marlee. If something pule the midge and it does not see the midge then it annex the marlee. If something annex the somerset then the somerset pule the marlee. If something annex the ventura then it misalign the marlee. If something pule the marlee then it pule the ventura. If something is shelled and it does not see the midge then it does not visit the midge. If something pule the marlee then it does not like the midge. If the ventura pule the marlee and the marlee is hairless then the ventura is not intrusive. If something pule the ventura then the ventura is acellular. The midge does not visit the ventura.", "logic": "\nAcellular(somerset)\nnot Shelled(somerset)\nnot Misalign(ventura, somerset)\nAnnex(ventura, somerset)\nAnnex(ventura, midge)\nAnnex(marlee, somerset)\nPule(midge, marlee)\nforall x (Pule(x, midge) and not Annex(x, midge) -> Annex(x, marlee))\nforall x (Annex(x, somerset) -> Pule(somerset, marlee))\nforall x (Annex(x, ventura) -> Misalign(x, marlee))\nforall x (Pule(x, marlee) -> Pule(x, ventura))\nforall x (Shelled(x) and not Annex(x, midge) -> not Pule(x, midge))\nforall x (Pule(x, marlee) -> not Misalign(x, midge))\nPule(ventura, marlee) and Hairless(marlee) -> not Intrusive(ventura)\nforall x (Pule(x, ventura) -> Acellular(ventura))\n\nnot Pule(midge, ventura)\n\nPule(midge, marlee) and forall x (Pule(x, marlee) -> Pule(x, ventura)) -> therefore Pule(midge, ventura)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The piper is subaltern. The piper is not nordic. The verne does not like the piper. The verne mildew the piper. The verne mildew the hanan. The chere mildew the piper. The hanan vouch the chere. If something vouch the hanan and it does not see the hanan then it mildew the chere. If something mildew the piper then the piper vouch the chere. If something mildew the verne then it inject the chere. If something vouch the chere then it vouch the verne. If something is nordic and it does not see the hanan then it does not visit the hanan. If something vouch the chere then it does not like the hanan. If the verne vouch the chere and the chere is comical then the verne is not deadpan. If something vouch the verne then the verne is subaltern. The piper does not like the hanan.", "logic": "\nSubaltern(piper)\nnot Nordic(piper)\nnot Inject(verne, piper)\nMildew(verne, piper)\nMildew(verne, hanan)\nMildew(chere, piper)\nVouch(hanan, chere)\nforall x (Vouch(x, hanan) and not Mildew(x, hanan) -> Mildew(x, chere))\nforall x (Mildew(x, piper) -> Vouch(piper, chere))\nforall x (Mildew(x, verne) -> Inject(x, chere))\nforall x (Vouch(x, chere) -> Vouch(x, verne))\nforall x (Nordic(x) and not Mildew(x, hanan) -> not Vouch(x, hanan))\nforall x (Vouch(x, chere) -> not Inject(x, hanan))\nVouch(verne, chere) and Comical(chere) -> not Deadpan(verne)\nforall x (Vouch(x, verne) -> Subaltern(verne))\n\nnot Inject(piper, hanan)\n\nMildew(verne, piper) and forall x (Mildew(x, piper) -> Vouch(piper, chere)) -> therefore Vouch(piper, chere) Vouch(piper, chere) and forall x (Vouch(x, chere) -> not Inject(x, hanan)) -> therefore not Inject(piper, hanan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The denys is wilsonian. The denys is not indentured. The dolly does not like the denys. The dolly yammer the denys. The dolly yammer the laverne. The alyss yammer the denys. The laverne prolapse the alyss. If something prolapse the laverne and it does not see the laverne then it yammer the alyss. If something yammer the denys then the denys prolapse the alyss. If something yammer the dolly then it bestir the alyss. If something prolapse the alyss then it prolapse the dolly. If something is indentured and it does not see the laverne then it does not visit the laverne. If something prolapse the alyss then it does not like the laverne. If the dolly prolapse the alyss and the alyss is recherche then the dolly is not torn. If something prolapse the dolly then the dolly is wilsonian. The dolly is not wilsonian.", "logic": "\nWilsonian(denys)\nnot Indentured(denys)\nnot Bestir(dolly, denys)\nYammer(dolly, denys)\nYammer(dolly, laverne)\nYammer(alyss, denys)\nProlapse(laverne, alyss)\nforall x (Prolapse(x, laverne) and not Yammer(x, laverne) -> Yammer(x, alyss))\nforall x (Yammer(x, denys) -> Prolapse(denys, alyss))\nforall x (Yammer(x, dolly) -> Bestir(x, alyss))\nforall x (Prolapse(x, alyss) -> Prolapse(x, dolly))\nforall x (Indentured(x) and not Yammer(x, laverne) -> not Prolapse(x, laverne))\nforall x (Prolapse(x, alyss) -> not Bestir(x, laverne))\nProlapse(dolly, alyss) and Recherche(alyss) -> not Torn(dolly)\nforall x (Prolapse(x, dolly) -> Wilsonian(dolly))\n\nnot Wilsonian(dolly)\n\nProlapse(laverne, alyss) and forall x (Prolapse(x, alyss) -> Prolapse(x, dolly)) -> therefore Prolapse(laverne, dolly) Prolapse(laverne, dolly) and forall x (Prolapse(x, dolly) -> Wilsonian(dolly)) -> therefore Wilsonian(dolly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The jermayne is supervised. The jermayne is not beggarly. The rosemaria does not like the jermayne. The rosemaria hydrolise the jermayne. The rosemaria hydrolise the benton. The lurline hydrolise the jermayne. The benton shit the lurline. If something shit the benton and it does not see the benton then it hydrolise the lurline. If something hydrolise the jermayne then the jermayne shit the lurline. If something hydrolise the rosemaria then it orbit the lurline. If something shit the lurline then it shit the rosemaria. If something is beggarly and it does not see the benton then it does not visit the benton. If something shit the lurline then it does not like the benton. If the rosemaria shit the lurline and the lurline is tantamount then the rosemaria is not awing. If something shit the rosemaria then the rosemaria is supervised. The rosemaria does not visit the rosemaria.", "logic": "\nSupervised(jermayne)\nnot Beggarly(jermayne)\nnot Orbit(rosemaria, jermayne)\nHydrolise(rosemaria, jermayne)\nHydrolise(rosemaria, benton)\nHydrolise(lurline, jermayne)\nShit(benton, lurline)\nforall x (Shit(x, benton) and not Hydrolise(x, benton) -> Hydrolise(x, lurline))\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, jermayne) -> Shit(jermayne, lurline))\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, rosemaria) -> Orbit(x, lurline))\nforall x (Shit(x, lurline) -> Shit(x, rosemaria))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) and not Hydrolise(x, benton) -> not Shit(x, benton))\nforall x (Shit(x, lurline) -> not Orbit(x, benton))\nShit(rosemaria, lurline) and Tantamount(lurline) -> not Awing(rosemaria)\nforall x (Shit(x, rosemaria) -> Supervised(rosemaria))\n\nnot Shit(rosemaria, rosemaria)\n\nforall x (Shit(x, lurline) -> Shit(x, rosemaria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The sky is mounted. The sky is not loverlike. The eva does not like the sky. The eva sidle the sky. The eva sidle the marco. The halli sidle the sky. The marco snub the halli. If something snub the marco and it does not see the marco then it sidle the halli. If something sidle the sky then the sky snub the halli. If something sidle the eva then it dehumidify the halli. If something snub the halli then it snub the eva. If something is loverlike and it does not see the marco then it does not visit the marco. If something snub the halli then it does not like the marco. If the eva snub the halli and the halli is runproof then the eva is not bossy. If something snub the eva then the eva is mounted. The sky sidle the halli.", "logic": "\nMounted(sky)\nnot Loverlike(sky)\nnot Dehumidify(eva, sky)\nSidle(eva, sky)\nSidle(eva, marco)\nSidle(halli, sky)\nSnub(marco, halli)\nforall x (Snub(x, marco) and not Sidle(x, marco) -> Sidle(x, halli))\nforall x (Sidle(x, sky) -> Snub(sky, halli))\nforall x (Sidle(x, eva) -> Dehumidify(x, halli))\nforall x (Snub(x, halli) -> Snub(x, eva))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and not Sidle(x, marco) -> not Snub(x, marco))\nforall x (Snub(x, halli) -> not Dehumidify(x, marco))\nSnub(eva, halli) and Runproof(halli) -> not Bossy(eva)\nforall x (Snub(x, eva) -> Mounted(eva))\n\nSidle(sky, halli)\n\nforall x (Snub(x, marco) and not Sidle(x, marco) -> Sidle(x, halli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The stafford is unrelieved. The stafford is not insouciant. The timothy does not like the stafford. The timothy fade the stafford. The timothy fade the tremaine. The fifine fade the stafford. The tremaine quiver the fifine. If something quiver the tremaine and it does not see the tremaine then it fade the fifine. If something fade the stafford then the stafford quiver the fifine. If something fade the timothy then it vitiate the fifine. If something quiver the fifine then it quiver the timothy. If something is insouciant and it does not see the tremaine then it does not visit the tremaine. If something quiver the fifine then it does not like the tremaine. If the timothy quiver the fifine and the fifine is moneran then the timothy is not hierarchal. If something quiver the timothy then the timothy is unrelieved. The tremaine does not like the fifine.", "logic": "\nUnrelieved(stafford)\nnot Insouciant(stafford)\nnot Vitiate(timothy, stafford)\nFade(timothy, stafford)\nFade(timothy, tremaine)\nFade(fifine, stafford)\nQuiver(tremaine, fifine)\nforall x (Quiver(x, tremaine) and not Fade(x, tremaine) -> Fade(x, fifine))\nforall x (Fade(x, stafford) -> Quiver(stafford, fifine))\nforall x (Fade(x, timothy) -> Vitiate(x, fifine))\nforall x (Quiver(x, fifine) -> Quiver(x, timothy))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) and not Fade(x, tremaine) -> not Quiver(x, tremaine))\nforall x (Quiver(x, fifine) -> not Vitiate(x, tremaine))\nQuiver(timothy, fifine) and Moneran(fifine) -> not Hierarchal(timothy)\nforall x (Quiver(x, timothy) -> Unrelieved(timothy))\n\nnot Vitiate(tremaine, fifine)\n\nforall x (Fade(x, timothy) -> Vitiate(x, fifine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The niels is flexible. The niels is not engrossing. The ramona does not like the niels. The ramona laud the niels. The ramona laud the oswald. The valeda laud the niels. The oswald thaw the valeda. If something thaw the oswald and it does not see the oswald then it laud the valeda. If something laud the niels then the niels thaw the valeda. If something laud the ramona then it meld the valeda. If something thaw the valeda then it thaw the ramona. If something is engrossing and it does not see the oswald then it does not visit the oswald. If something thaw the valeda then it does not like the oswald. If the ramona thaw the valeda and the valeda is peopled then the ramona is not passee. If something thaw the ramona then the ramona is flexible. The valeda is engrossing.", "logic": "\nFlexible(niels)\nnot Engrossing(niels)\nnot Meld(ramona, niels)\nLaud(ramona, niels)\nLaud(ramona, oswald)\nLaud(valeda, niels)\nThaw(oswald, valeda)\nforall x (Thaw(x, oswald) and not Laud(x, oswald) -> Laud(x, valeda))\nforall x (Laud(x, niels) -> Thaw(niels, valeda))\nforall x (Laud(x, ramona) -> Meld(x, valeda))\nforall x (Thaw(x, valeda) -> Thaw(x, ramona))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) and not Laud(x, oswald) -> not Thaw(x, oswald))\nforall x (Thaw(x, valeda) -> not Meld(x, oswald))\nThaw(ramona, valeda) and Peopled(valeda) -> not Passee(ramona)\nforall x (Thaw(x, ramona) -> Flexible(ramona))\n\nEngrossing(valeda)\n\nEngrossing(valeda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The kaylee is koranic. The kaylee is not rapid. The collette does not like the kaylee. The collette effloresce the kaylee. The collette effloresce the webb. The osbourne effloresce the kaylee. The webb segment the osbourne. If something segment the webb and it does not see the webb then it effloresce the osbourne. If something effloresce the kaylee then the kaylee segment the osbourne. If something effloresce the collette then it waitress the osbourne. If something segment the osbourne then it segment the collette. If something is rapid and it does not see the webb then it does not visit the webb. If something segment the osbourne then it does not like the webb. If the collette segment the osbourne and the osbourne is tense then the collette is not commanding. If something segment the collette then the collette is koranic. The collette is not rapid.", "logic": "\nKoranic(kaylee)\nnot Rapid(kaylee)\nnot Waitress(collette, kaylee)\nEffloresce(collette, kaylee)\nEffloresce(collette, webb)\nEffloresce(osbourne, kaylee)\nSegment(webb, osbourne)\nforall x (Segment(x, webb) and not Effloresce(x, webb) -> Effloresce(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, kaylee) -> Segment(kaylee, osbourne))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, collette) -> Waitress(x, osbourne))\nforall x (Segment(x, osbourne) -> Segment(x, collette))\nforall x (Rapid(x) and not Effloresce(x, webb) -> not Segment(x, webb))\nforall x (Segment(x, osbourne) -> not Waitress(x, webb))\nSegment(collette, osbourne) and Tense(osbourne) -> not Commanding(collette)\nforall x (Segment(x, collette) -> Koranic(collette))\n\nnot Rapid(collette)\n\nnot Rapid(collette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "The france is covalent. The france is not tanzanian. The danit does not like the france. The danit slave the france. The danit slave the urbano. The bertrand slave the france. The urbano obtain the bertrand. If something obtain the urbano and it does not see the urbano then it slave the bertrand. If something slave the france then the france obtain the bertrand. If something slave the danit then it dice the bertrand. If something obtain the bertrand then it obtain the danit. If something is tanzanian and it does not see the urbano then it does not visit the urbano. If something obtain the bertrand then it does not like the urbano. If the danit obtain the bertrand and the bertrand is ismaili then the danit is not prayerful. If something obtain the danit then the danit is covalent. The bertrand dice the urbano.", "logic": "\nCovalent(france)\nnot Tanzanian(france)\nnot Dice(danit, france)\nSlave(danit, france)\nSlave(danit, urbano)\nSlave(bertrand, france)\nObtain(urbano, bertrand)\nforall x (Obtain(x, urbano) and not Slave(x, urbano) -> Slave(x, bertrand))\nforall x (Slave(x, france) -> Obtain(france, bertrand))\nforall x (Slave(x, danit) -> Dice(x, bertrand))\nforall x (Obtain(x, bertrand) -> Obtain(x, danit))\nforall x (Tanzanian(x) and not Slave(x, urbano) -> not Obtain(x, urbano))\nforall x (Obtain(x, bertrand) -> not Dice(x, urbano))\nObtain(danit, bertrand) and Ismaili(bertrand) -> not Prayerful(danit)\nforall x (Obtain(x, danit) -> Covalent(danit))\n\nDice(bertrand, urbano)\n\nDice(bertrand, urbano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-676"} {"premises": "Michel is falling. Michel is shallow. Michel is sexist. Michel is bilabial. Michel is autistic. Marlo is shallow. Marlo is ultrasonic. Marlo is sexist. Rodrick is falling. Rodrick is interwoven. Rodrick is not shallow. Rodrick is not ultrasonic. Rodrick is sexist. Rodrick is bilabial. Rodrick is not autistic. Nice, falling people are shallow. If Marlo is interwoven and Marlo is falling then Marlo is not sexist. All interwoven, shallow people are ultrasonic. If someone is sexist and not shallow then they are bilabial. If someone is interwoven and not falling then they are not bilabial. If someone is bilabial and shallow then they are sexist. Rodrick is falling.", "logic": "\nFalling(michel)\nShallow(michel)\nSexist(michel)\nBilabial(michel)\nAutistic(michel)\nShallow(marlo)\nUltrasonic(marlo)\nSexist(marlo)\nFalling(rodrick)\nInterwoven(rodrick)\nnot Shallow(rodrick)\nnot Ultrasonic(rodrick)\nSexist(rodrick)\nBilabial(rodrick)\nnot Autistic(rodrick)\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) and Falling(x) -> Shallow(x))\nInterwoven(marlo) and Falling(marlo) -> not Sexist(marlo)\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Shallow(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\nforall x (Sexist(x) and not Shallow(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and not Falling(x) -> not Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Bilabial(x) and Shallow(x) -> Sexist(x))\n\nFalling(rodrick)\n\ntherefore Falling(rodrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3889"} {"premises": "Micah is inherent. Micah is striped. Micah is moresque. Micah is cissy. Micah is evident. Evangelin is striped. Evangelin is unselected. Evangelin is moresque. Queenie is inherent. Queenie is insatiable. Queenie is not striped. Queenie is not unselected. Queenie is moresque. Queenie is cissy. Queenie is not evident. Nice, inherent people are striped. If Evangelin is insatiable and Evangelin is inherent then Evangelin is not moresque. All insatiable, striped people are unselected. If someone is moresque and not striped then they are cissy. If someone is insatiable and not inherent then they are not cissy. If someone is cissy and striped then they are moresque. Evangelin is not unselected.", "logic": "\nInherent(micah)\nStriped(micah)\nMoresque(micah)\nCissy(micah)\nEvident(micah)\nStriped(evangelin)\nUnselected(evangelin)\nMoresque(evangelin)\nInherent(queenie)\nInsatiable(queenie)\nnot Striped(queenie)\nnot Unselected(queenie)\nMoresque(queenie)\nCissy(queenie)\nnot Evident(queenie)\nforall x (Unselected(x) and Inherent(x) -> Striped(x))\nInsatiable(evangelin) and Inherent(evangelin) -> not Moresque(evangelin)\nforall x (Insatiable(x) and Striped(x) -> Unselected(x))\nforall x (Moresque(x) and not Striped(x) -> Cissy(x))\nforall x (Insatiable(x) and not Inherent(x) -> not Cissy(x))\nforall x (Cissy(x) and Striped(x) -> Moresque(x))\n\nnot Unselected(evangelin)\n\ntherefore Unselected(evangelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3889"} {"premises": "Arron is czaristic. Arron is zolaesque. Arron is benignant. Arron is flinty. Arron is ramate. Ketty is zolaesque. Ketty is motiveless. Ketty is benignant. Katrinka is czaristic. Katrinka is tearful. Katrinka is not zolaesque. Katrinka is not motiveless. Katrinka is benignant. Katrinka is flinty. Katrinka is not ramate. Nice, czaristic people are zolaesque. If Ketty is tearful and Ketty is czaristic then Ketty is not benignant. All tearful, zolaesque people are motiveless. If someone is benignant and not zolaesque then they are flinty. If someone is tearful and not czaristic then they are not flinty. If someone is flinty and zolaesque then they are benignant. Ketty is not flinty.", "logic": "\nCzaristic(arron)\nZolaesque(arron)\nBenignant(arron)\nFlinty(arron)\nRamate(arron)\nZolaesque(ketty)\nMotiveless(ketty)\nBenignant(ketty)\nCzaristic(katrinka)\nTearful(katrinka)\nnot Zolaesque(katrinka)\nnot Motiveless(katrinka)\nBenignant(katrinka)\nFlinty(katrinka)\nnot Ramate(katrinka)\nforall x (Motiveless(x) and Czaristic(x) -> Zolaesque(x))\nTearful(ketty) and Czaristic(ketty) -> not Benignant(ketty)\nforall x (Tearful(x) and Zolaesque(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Benignant(x) and not Zolaesque(x) -> Flinty(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) and not Czaristic(x) -> not Flinty(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) and Zolaesque(x) -> Benignant(x))\n\nnot Flinty(ketty)\n\nforall x (Benignant(x) and not Zolaesque(x) -> Flinty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3889"} {"premises": "Bree is raised. Bree is shouldered. Bree is outraged. Bree is ponderous. Bree is aminic. Agnese is shouldered. Agnese is sabine. Agnese is outraged. Izak is raised. Izak is tomboyish. Izak is not shouldered. Izak is not sabine. Izak is outraged. Izak is ponderous. Izak is not aminic. Nice, raised people are shouldered. If Agnese is tomboyish and Agnese is raised then Agnese is not outraged. All tomboyish, shouldered people are sabine. If someone is outraged and not shouldered then they are ponderous. If someone is tomboyish and not raised then they are not ponderous. If someone is ponderous and shouldered then they are outraged. Agnese is raised.", "logic": "\nRaised(bree)\nShouldered(bree)\nOutraged(bree)\nPonderous(bree)\nAminic(bree)\nShouldered(agnese)\nSabine(agnese)\nOutraged(agnese)\nRaised(izak)\nTomboyish(izak)\nnot Shouldered(izak)\nnot Sabine(izak)\nOutraged(izak)\nPonderous(izak)\nnot Aminic(izak)\nforall x (Sabine(x) and Raised(x) -> Shouldered(x))\nTomboyish(agnese) and Raised(agnese) -> not Outraged(agnese)\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and Shouldered(x) -> Sabine(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) and not Shouldered(x) -> Ponderous(x))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and not Raised(x) -> not Ponderous(x))\nforall x (Ponderous(x) and Shouldered(x) -> Outraged(x))\n\nRaised(agnese)\n\nRaised(agnese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3889"} {"premises": "The mayor is imperial. The paolina detour the cherish. The paolina does not eat the daisy. The paolina hectograph the cherish. The cherish detour the mayor. The daisy is antarctic. The daisy is barebacked. If the cherish is pineal and the cherish does not eat the paolina then the cherish is barebacked. If someone hectograph the mayor then the mayor does not see the cherish. If the paolina hectograph the cherish then the paolina vamoose the cherish. If the mayor detour the cherish then the mayor detour the daisy. If someone detour the mayor and the mayor hectograph the daisy then the mayor does not eat the cherish. If someone detour the cherish then the cherish hectograph the mayor. The paolina detour the cherish.", "logic": "\nImperial(mayor)\nDetour(paolina, cherish)\nnot Detour(paolina, daisy)\nHectograph(paolina, cherish)\nDetour(cherish, mayor)\nAntarctic(daisy)\nBarebacked(daisy)\nPineal(cherish) and not Detour(cherish, paolina) -> Barebacked(cherish)\nforall x (Hectograph(x, mayor) -> not Hectograph(mayor, cherish))\nHectograph(paolina, cherish) -> Vamoose(paolina, cherish)\nDetour(mayor, cherish) -> Detour(mayor, daisy)\nforall x (Detour(x, mayor) and Hectograph(mayor, daisy) -> not Detour(mayor, cherish))\nforall x (Detour(x, cherish) -> Hectograph(cherish, mayor))\n\nDetour(paolina, cherish)\n\ntherefore Detour(paolina, cherish)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The eugenia is narcotic. The conway perennate the conway. The conway does not eat the clovis. The conway train the conway. The conway perennate the eugenia. The clovis is expiratory. The clovis is seminude. If the conway is baked and the conway does not eat the conway then the conway is seminude. If someone train the eugenia then the eugenia does not see the conway. If the conway train the conway then the conway bash the conway. If the eugenia perennate the conway then the eugenia perennate the clovis. If someone perennate the eugenia and the eugenia train the clovis then the eugenia does not eat the conway. If someone perennate the conway then the conway train the eugenia. The clovis is not seminude.", "logic": "\nNarcotic(eugenia)\nPerennate(conway, conway)\nnot Perennate(conway, clovis)\nTrain(conway, conway)\nPerennate(conway, eugenia)\nExpiratory(clovis)\nSeminude(clovis)\nBaked(conway) and not Perennate(conway, conway) -> Seminude(conway)\nforall x (Train(x, eugenia) -> not Train(eugenia, conway))\nTrain(conway, conway) -> Bash(conway, conway)\nPerennate(eugenia, conway) -> Perennate(eugenia, clovis)\nforall x (Perennate(x, eugenia) and Train(eugenia, clovis) -> not Perennate(eugenia, conway))\nforall x (Perennate(x, conway) -> Train(conway, eugenia))\n\nnot Seminude(clovis)\n\ntherefore Seminude(clovis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The letitia is soggy. The natalya braise the terese. The natalya does not eat the jonell. The natalya endeavor the terese. The terese braise the letitia. The jonell is limbless. The jonell is renewing. If the terese is oceangoing and the terese does not eat the natalya then the terese is renewing. If someone endeavor the letitia then the letitia does not see the terese. If the natalya endeavor the terese then the natalya lace the terese. If the letitia braise the terese then the letitia braise the jonell. If someone braise the letitia and the letitia endeavor the jonell then the letitia does not eat the terese. If someone braise the terese then the terese endeavor the letitia. The terese endeavor the letitia.", "logic": "\nSoggy(letitia)\nBraise(natalya, terese)\nnot Braise(natalya, jonell)\nEndeavor(natalya, terese)\nBraise(terese, letitia)\nLimbless(jonell)\nRenewing(jonell)\nOceangoing(terese) and not Braise(terese, natalya) -> Renewing(terese)\nforall x (Endeavor(x, letitia) -> not Endeavor(letitia, terese))\nEndeavor(natalya, terese) -> Lace(natalya, terese)\nBraise(letitia, terese) -> Braise(letitia, jonell)\nforall x (Braise(x, letitia) and Endeavor(letitia, jonell) -> not Braise(letitia, terese))\nforall x (Braise(x, terese) -> Endeavor(terese, letitia))\n\nEndeavor(terese, letitia)\n\nBraise(natalya, terese) and forall x (Braise(x, terese) -> Endeavor(terese, letitia)) -> therefore Endeavor(terese, letitia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The johannes is hydrated. The gilda clangour the davita. The gilda does not eat the valma. The gilda crop the davita. The davita clangour the johannes. The valma is unfocussed. The valma is recreant. If the davita is woolly and the davita does not eat the gilda then the davita is recreant. If someone crop the johannes then the johannes does not see the davita. If the gilda crop the davita then the gilda thrive the davita. If the johannes clangour the davita then the johannes clangour the valma. If someone clangour the johannes and the johannes crop the valma then the johannes does not eat the davita. If someone clangour the davita then the davita crop the johannes. The gilda does not like the davita.", "logic": "\nHydrated(johannes)\nClangour(gilda, davita)\nnot Clangour(gilda, valma)\nCrop(gilda, davita)\nClangour(davita, johannes)\nUnfocussed(valma)\nRecreant(valma)\nWoolly(davita) and not Clangour(davita, gilda) -> Recreant(davita)\nforall x (Crop(x, johannes) -> not Crop(johannes, davita))\nCrop(gilda, davita) -> Thrive(gilda, davita)\nClangour(johannes, davita) -> Clangour(johannes, valma)\nforall x (Clangour(x, johannes) and Crop(johannes, valma) -> not Clangour(johannes, davita))\nforall x (Clangour(x, davita) -> Crop(davita, johannes))\n\nnot Thrive(gilda, davita)\n\nCrop(gilda, davita) and Crop(gilda, davita) -> Thrive(gilda, davita) -> therefore Thrive(gilda, davita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The angel is stunned. The lara announce the cami. The lara does not eat the raychel. The lara outdo the cami. The cami announce the angel. The raychel is silken. The raychel is untoasted. If the cami is cluttered and the cami does not eat the lara then the cami is untoasted. If someone outdo the angel then the angel does not see the cami. If the lara outdo the cami then the lara yawl the cami. If the angel announce the cami then the angel announce the raychel. If someone announce the angel and the angel outdo the raychel then the angel does not eat the cami. If someone announce the cami then the cami outdo the angel. The angel does not see the cami.", "logic": "\nStunned(angel)\nAnnounce(lara, cami)\nnot Announce(lara, raychel)\nOutdo(lara, cami)\nAnnounce(cami, angel)\nSilken(raychel)\nUntoasted(raychel)\nCluttered(cami) and not Announce(cami, lara) -> Untoasted(cami)\nforall x (Outdo(x, angel) -> not Outdo(angel, cami))\nOutdo(lara, cami) -> Yawl(lara, cami)\nAnnounce(angel, cami) -> Announce(angel, raychel)\nforall x (Announce(x, angel) and Outdo(angel, raychel) -> not Announce(angel, cami))\nforall x (Announce(x, cami) -> Outdo(cami, angel))\n\nnot Outdo(angel, cami)\n\nAnnounce(lara, cami) and forall x (Announce(x, cami) -> Outdo(cami, angel)) -> therefore Outdo(cami, angel) Outdo(cami, angel) and forall x (Outdo(x, angel) -> not Outdo(angel, cami)) -> therefore not Outdo(angel, cami)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The kelcy is menopausal. The baldwin comb the danella. The baldwin does not eat the don. The baldwin brunch the danella. The danella comb the kelcy. The don is athletic. The don is glandular. If the danella is frustrated and the danella does not eat the baldwin then the danella is glandular. If someone brunch the kelcy then the kelcy does not see the danella. If the baldwin brunch the danella then the baldwin buffer the danella. If the kelcy comb the danella then the kelcy comb the don. If someone comb the kelcy and the kelcy brunch the don then the kelcy does not eat the danella. If someone comb the danella then the danella brunch the kelcy. The kelcy brunch the danella.", "logic": "\nMenopausal(kelcy)\nComb(baldwin, danella)\nnot Comb(baldwin, don)\nBrunch(baldwin, danella)\nComb(danella, kelcy)\nAthletic(don)\nGlandular(don)\nFrustrated(danella) and not Comb(danella, baldwin) -> Glandular(danella)\nforall x (Brunch(x, kelcy) -> not Brunch(kelcy, danella))\nBrunch(baldwin, danella) -> Buffer(baldwin, danella)\nComb(kelcy, danella) -> Comb(kelcy, don)\nforall x (Comb(x, kelcy) and Brunch(kelcy, don) -> not Comb(kelcy, danella))\nforall x (Comb(x, danella) -> Brunch(danella, kelcy))\n\nBrunch(kelcy, danella)\n\nComb(baldwin, danella) and forall x (Comb(x, danella) -> Brunch(danella, kelcy)) -> therefore Brunch(danella, kelcy) Brunch(danella, kelcy) and forall x (Brunch(x, kelcy) -> not Brunch(kelcy, danella)) -> therefore not Brunch(kelcy, danella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The germaine is teeny. The josefina overfill the myrah. The josefina does not eat the devin. The josefina elegize the myrah. The myrah overfill the germaine. The devin is bearable. The devin is seventy. If the myrah is quaint and the myrah does not eat the josefina then the myrah is seventy. If someone elegize the germaine then the germaine does not see the myrah. If the josefina elegize the myrah then the josefina staff the myrah. If the germaine overfill the myrah then the germaine overfill the devin. If someone overfill the germaine and the germaine elegize the devin then the germaine does not eat the myrah. If someone overfill the myrah then the myrah elegize the germaine. The myrah is not seventy.", "logic": "\nTeeny(germaine)\nOverfill(josefina, myrah)\nnot Overfill(josefina, devin)\nElegize(josefina, myrah)\nOverfill(myrah, germaine)\nBearable(devin)\nSeventy(devin)\nQuaint(myrah) and not Overfill(myrah, josefina) -> Seventy(myrah)\nforall x (Elegize(x, germaine) -> not Elegize(germaine, myrah))\nElegize(josefina, myrah) -> Staff(josefina, myrah)\nOverfill(germaine, myrah) -> Overfill(germaine, devin)\nforall x (Overfill(x, germaine) and Elegize(germaine, devin) -> not Overfill(germaine, myrah))\nforall x (Overfill(x, myrah) -> Elegize(myrah, germaine))\n\nnot Seventy(myrah)\n\nQuaint(myrah) and not Overfill(myrah, josefina) -> Seventy(myrah) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The elric is mobile. The raf aggrade the susanne. The raf does not eat the cecilla. The raf fund the susanne. The susanne aggrade the elric. The cecilla is pacific. The cecilla is reformist. If the susanne is sizeable and the susanne does not eat the raf then the susanne is reformist. If someone fund the elric then the elric does not see the susanne. If the raf fund the susanne then the raf open the susanne. If the elric aggrade the susanne then the elric aggrade the cecilla. If someone aggrade the elric and the elric fund the cecilla then the elric does not eat the susanne. If someone aggrade the susanne then the susanne fund the elric. The elric aggrade the cecilla.", "logic": "\nMobile(elric)\nAggrade(raf, susanne)\nnot Aggrade(raf, cecilla)\nFund(raf, susanne)\nAggrade(susanne, elric)\nPacific(cecilla)\nReformist(cecilla)\nSizeable(susanne) and not Aggrade(susanne, raf) -> Reformist(susanne)\nforall x (Fund(x, elric) -> not Fund(elric, susanne))\nFund(raf, susanne) -> Open(raf, susanne)\nAggrade(elric, susanne) -> Aggrade(elric, cecilla)\nforall x (Aggrade(x, elric) and Fund(elric, cecilla) -> not Aggrade(elric, susanne))\nforall x (Aggrade(x, susanne) -> Fund(susanne, elric))\n\nAggrade(elric, cecilla)\n\nAggrade(elric, susanne) -> Aggrade(elric, cecilla) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The chastity is steely. The ulises defrost the beatriz. The ulises does not eat the meg. The ulises featherbed the beatriz. The beatriz defrost the chastity. The meg is diffuse. The meg is geared. If the beatriz is puzzled and the beatriz does not eat the ulises then the beatriz is geared. If someone featherbed the chastity then the chastity does not see the beatriz. If the ulises featherbed the beatriz then the ulises shirt the beatriz. If the chastity defrost the beatriz then the chastity defrost the meg. If someone defrost the chastity and the chastity featherbed the meg then the chastity does not eat the beatriz. If someone defrost the beatriz then the beatriz featherbed the chastity. The ulises is not cold.", "logic": "\nSteely(chastity)\nDefrost(ulises, beatriz)\nnot Defrost(ulises, meg)\nFeatherbed(ulises, beatriz)\nDefrost(beatriz, chastity)\nDiffuse(meg)\nGeared(meg)\nPuzzled(beatriz) and not Defrost(beatriz, ulises) -> Geared(beatriz)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, chastity) -> not Featherbed(chastity, beatriz))\nFeatherbed(ulises, beatriz) -> Shirt(ulises, beatriz)\nDefrost(chastity, beatriz) -> Defrost(chastity, meg)\nforall x (Defrost(x, chastity) and Featherbed(chastity, meg) -> not Defrost(chastity, beatriz))\nforall x (Defrost(x, beatriz) -> Featherbed(beatriz, chastity))\n\nnot Cold(ulises)\n\nnot Cold(ulises) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The wynn is outbred. The hulda despond the sigfried. The hulda does not eat the jolynn. The hulda snub the sigfried. The sigfried despond the wynn. The jolynn is oxidised. The jolynn is cytotoxic. If the sigfried is helpful and the sigfried does not eat the hulda then the sigfried is cytotoxic. If someone snub the wynn then the wynn does not see the sigfried. If the hulda snub the sigfried then the hulda taxi the sigfried. If the wynn despond the sigfried then the wynn despond the jolynn. If someone despond the wynn and the wynn snub the jolynn then the wynn does not eat the sigfried. If someone despond the sigfried then the sigfried snub the wynn. The jolynn despond the hulda.", "logic": "\nOutbred(wynn)\nDespond(hulda, sigfried)\nnot Despond(hulda, jolynn)\nSnub(hulda, sigfried)\nDespond(sigfried, wynn)\nOxidised(jolynn)\nCytotoxic(jolynn)\nHelpful(sigfried) and not Despond(sigfried, hulda) -> Cytotoxic(sigfried)\nforall x (Snub(x, wynn) -> not Snub(wynn, sigfried))\nSnub(hulda, sigfried) -> Taxi(hulda, sigfried)\nDespond(wynn, sigfried) -> Despond(wynn, jolynn)\nforall x (Despond(x, wynn) and Snub(wynn, jolynn) -> not Despond(wynn, sigfried))\nforall x (Despond(x, sigfried) -> Snub(sigfried, wynn))\n\nDespond(jolynn, hulda)\n\nDespond(jolynn, hulda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The xerxes is fitting. The maddalena weary the scotti. The maddalena does not eat the bettine. The maddalena knight the scotti. The scotti weary the xerxes. The bettine is outlawed. The bettine is lossless. If the scotti is sequential and the scotti does not eat the maddalena then the scotti is lossless. If someone knight the xerxes then the xerxes does not see the scotti. If the maddalena knight the scotti then the maddalena frighten the scotti. If the xerxes weary the scotti then the xerxes weary the bettine. If someone weary the xerxes and the xerxes knight the bettine then the xerxes does not eat the scotti. If someone weary the scotti then the scotti knight the xerxes. The scotti does not like the bettine.", "logic": "\nFitting(xerxes)\nWeary(maddalena, scotti)\nnot Weary(maddalena, bettine)\nKnight(maddalena, scotti)\nWeary(scotti, xerxes)\nOutlawed(bettine)\nLossless(bettine)\nSequential(scotti) and not Weary(scotti, maddalena) -> Lossless(scotti)\nforall x (Knight(x, xerxes) -> not Knight(xerxes, scotti))\nKnight(maddalena, scotti) -> Frighten(maddalena, scotti)\nWeary(xerxes, scotti) -> Weary(xerxes, bettine)\nforall x (Weary(x, xerxes) and Knight(xerxes, bettine) -> not Weary(xerxes, scotti))\nforall x (Weary(x, scotti) -> Knight(scotti, xerxes))\n\nnot Frighten(scotti, bettine)\n\nnot Frighten(scotti, bettine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "The ileane is faraway. The torey fellate the ainslee. The torey does not eat the tristan. The torey hackle the ainslee. The ainslee fellate the ileane. The tristan is global. The tristan is major. If the ainslee is arenaceous and the ainslee does not eat the torey then the ainslee is major. If someone hackle the ileane then the ileane does not see the ainslee. If the torey hackle the ainslee then the torey expend the ainslee. If the ileane fellate the ainslee then the ileane fellate the tristan. If someone fellate the ileane and the ileane hackle the tristan then the ileane does not eat the ainslee. If someone fellate the ainslee then the ainslee hackle the ileane. The ainslee is faraway.", "logic": "\nFaraway(ileane)\nFellate(torey, ainslee)\nnot Fellate(torey, tristan)\nHackle(torey, ainslee)\nFellate(ainslee, ileane)\nGlobal(tristan)\nMajor(tristan)\nArenaceous(ainslee) and not Fellate(ainslee, torey) -> Major(ainslee)\nforall x (Hackle(x, ileane) -> not Hackle(ileane, ainslee))\nHackle(torey, ainslee) -> Expend(torey, ainslee)\nFellate(ileane, ainslee) -> Fellate(ileane, tristan)\nforall x (Fellate(x, ileane) and Hackle(ileane, tristan) -> not Fellate(ileane, ainslee))\nforall x (Fellate(x, ainslee) -> Hackle(ainslee, ileane))\n\nFaraway(ainslee)\n\nFaraway(ainslee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-448"} {"premises": "Simmonds is pianistic. Simmonds is not shadowy. Simmonds is decimal. Simmonds is unseeing. Essy is unseeing. Lenna is shadowy. Lenna is polished. Lenna is not decimal. Lenna is armillary. Lenna is asiatic. Quiet people are not pianistic. All pianistic, unseeing people are decimal. If Essy is asiatic and Essy is armillary then Essy is pianistic. If Essy is unseeing then Essy is pianistic. Quiet, unseeing people are polished. If someone is decimal and not armillary then they are not asiatic. All decimal, unseeing people are not shadowy. If someone is asiatic and not pianistic then they are shadowy. Simmonds is pianistic.", "logic": "\nPianistic(simmonds)\nnot Shadowy(simmonds)\nDecimal(simmonds)\nUnseeing(simmonds)\nUnseeing(essy)\nShadowy(lenna)\nPolished(lenna)\nnot Decimal(lenna)\nArmillary(lenna)\nAsiatic(lenna)\nforall x (Armillary(x) -> not Pianistic(x))\nforall x (Pianistic(x) and Unseeing(x) -> Decimal(x))\nAsiatic(essy) and Armillary(essy) -> Pianistic(essy)\nUnseeing(essy) -> Pianistic(essy)\nforall x (Armillary(x) and Unseeing(x) -> Polished(x))\nforall x (Decimal(x) and not Armillary(x) -> not Asiatic(x))\nforall x (Decimal(x) and Unseeing(x) -> not Shadowy(x))\nforall x (Asiatic(x) and not Pianistic(x) -> Shadowy(x))\n\nPianistic(simmonds)\n\ntherefore Pianistic(simmonds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Yehudi is extraneous. Yehudi is not cerulean. Yehudi is varying. Yehudi is illegible. Rakel is illegible. Lorain is cerulean. Lorain is valorous. Lorain is not varying. Lorain is asserted. Lorain is upfront. Quiet people are not extraneous. All extraneous, illegible people are varying. If Rakel is upfront and Rakel is asserted then Rakel is extraneous. If Rakel is illegible then Rakel is extraneous. Quiet, illegible people are valorous. If someone is varying and not asserted then they are not upfront. All varying, illegible people are not cerulean. If someone is upfront and not extraneous then they are cerulean. Yehudi is cerulean.", "logic": "\nExtraneous(yehudi)\nnot Cerulean(yehudi)\nVarying(yehudi)\nIllegible(yehudi)\nIllegible(rakel)\nCerulean(lorain)\nValorous(lorain)\nnot Varying(lorain)\nAsserted(lorain)\nUpfront(lorain)\nforall x (Asserted(x) -> not Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) and Illegible(x) -> Varying(x))\nUpfront(rakel) and Asserted(rakel) -> Extraneous(rakel)\nIllegible(rakel) -> Extraneous(rakel)\nforall x (Asserted(x) and Illegible(x) -> Valorous(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) and not Asserted(x) -> not Upfront(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) and Illegible(x) -> not Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Upfront(x) and not Extraneous(x) -> Cerulean(x))\n\nCerulean(yehudi)\n\ntherefore not Cerulean(yehudi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Gabrielle is skimpy. Gabrielle is not toothsome. Gabrielle is ethnic. Gabrielle is desired. Annemarie is desired. Henderson is toothsome. Henderson is liable. Henderson is not ethnic. Henderson is stormbound. Henderson is stagnant. Quiet people are not skimpy. All skimpy, desired people are ethnic. If Annemarie is stagnant and Annemarie is stormbound then Annemarie is skimpy. If Annemarie is desired then Annemarie is skimpy. Quiet, desired people are liable. If someone is ethnic and not stormbound then they are not stagnant. All ethnic, desired people are not toothsome. If someone is stagnant and not skimpy then they are toothsome. Henderson is not skimpy.", "logic": "\nSkimpy(gabrielle)\nnot Toothsome(gabrielle)\nEthnic(gabrielle)\nDesired(gabrielle)\nDesired(annemarie)\nToothsome(henderson)\nLiable(henderson)\nnot Ethnic(henderson)\nStormbound(henderson)\nStagnant(henderson)\nforall x (Stormbound(x) -> not Skimpy(x))\nforall x (Skimpy(x) and Desired(x) -> Ethnic(x))\nStagnant(annemarie) and Stormbound(annemarie) -> Skimpy(annemarie)\nDesired(annemarie) -> Skimpy(annemarie)\nforall x (Stormbound(x) and Desired(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) and not Stormbound(x) -> not Stagnant(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) and Desired(x) -> not Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Stagnant(x) and not Skimpy(x) -> Toothsome(x))\n\nnot Skimpy(henderson)\n\nStormbound(henderson) and forall x (Stormbound(x) -> not Skimpy(x)) -> therefore not Skimpy(henderson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Lamb is foul. Lamb is not annulate. Lamb is gilbertian. Lamb is skim. Corry is skim. Yehudit is annulate. Yehudit is hermetic. Yehudit is not gilbertian. Yehudit is crescendo. Yehudit is allometric. Quiet people are not foul. All foul, skim people are gilbertian. If Corry is allometric and Corry is crescendo then Corry is foul. If Corry is skim then Corry is foul. Quiet, skim people are hermetic. If someone is gilbertian and not crescendo then they are not allometric. All gilbertian, skim people are not annulate. If someone is allometric and not foul then they are annulate. Corry is not foul.", "logic": "\nFoul(lamb)\nnot Annulate(lamb)\nGilbertian(lamb)\nSkim(lamb)\nSkim(corry)\nAnnulate(yehudit)\nHermetic(yehudit)\nnot Gilbertian(yehudit)\nCrescendo(yehudit)\nAllometric(yehudit)\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> not Foul(x))\nforall x (Foul(x) and Skim(x) -> Gilbertian(x))\nAllometric(corry) and Crescendo(corry) -> Foul(corry)\nSkim(corry) -> Foul(corry)\nforall x (Crescendo(x) and Skim(x) -> Hermetic(x))\nforall x (Gilbertian(x) and not Crescendo(x) -> not Allometric(x))\nforall x (Gilbertian(x) and Skim(x) -> not Annulate(x))\nforall x (Allometric(x) and not Foul(x) -> Annulate(x))\n\nnot Foul(corry)\n\nSkim(corry) and Skim(corry) -> Foul(corry) -> therefore Foul(corry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Dionis is eldest. Dionis is not mannish. Dionis is perianal. Dionis is circuitous. Herbert is circuitous. Daisi is mannish. Daisi is auctorial. Daisi is not perianal. Daisi is excusatory. Daisi is constant. Quiet people are not eldest. All eldest, circuitous people are perianal. If Herbert is constant and Herbert is excusatory then Herbert is eldest. If Herbert is circuitous then Herbert is eldest. Quiet, circuitous people are auctorial. If someone is perianal and not excusatory then they are not constant. All perianal, circuitous people are not mannish. If someone is constant and not eldest then they are mannish. Herbert is perianal.", "logic": "\nEldest(dionis)\nnot Mannish(dionis)\nPerianal(dionis)\nCircuitous(dionis)\nCircuitous(herbert)\nMannish(daisi)\nAuctorial(daisi)\nnot Perianal(daisi)\nExcusatory(daisi)\nConstant(daisi)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> not Eldest(x))\nforall x (Eldest(x) and Circuitous(x) -> Perianal(x))\nConstant(herbert) and Excusatory(herbert) -> Eldest(herbert)\nCircuitous(herbert) -> Eldest(herbert)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) and Circuitous(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nforall x (Perianal(x) and not Excusatory(x) -> not Constant(x))\nforall x (Perianal(x) and Circuitous(x) -> not Mannish(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) and not Eldest(x) -> Mannish(x))\n\nPerianal(herbert)\n\nCircuitous(herbert) and Circuitous(herbert) -> Eldest(herbert) -> therefore Eldest(herbert) Eldest(herbert) and Circuitous(herbert) and forall x (Eldest(x) and Circuitous(x) -> Perianal(x)) -> therefore Perianal(herbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Val is diastolic. Val is not wriggly. Val is swanky. Val is ilxx. Johnna is ilxx. Emylee is wriggly. Emylee is eremitic. Emylee is not swanky. Emylee is farsighted. Emylee is oneiric. Quiet people are not diastolic. All diastolic, ilxx people are swanky. If Johnna is oneiric and Johnna is farsighted then Johnna is diastolic. If Johnna is ilxx then Johnna is diastolic. Quiet, ilxx people are eremitic. If someone is swanky and not farsighted then they are not oneiric. All swanky, ilxx people are not wriggly. If someone is oneiric and not diastolic then they are wriggly. Johnna is not swanky.", "logic": "\nDiastolic(val)\nnot Wriggly(val)\nSwanky(val)\nIlxx(val)\nIlxx(johnna)\nWriggly(emylee)\nEremitic(emylee)\nnot Swanky(emylee)\nFarsighted(emylee)\nOneiric(emylee)\nforall x (Farsighted(x) -> not Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Ilxx(x) -> Swanky(x))\nOneiric(johnna) and Farsighted(johnna) -> Diastolic(johnna)\nIlxx(johnna) -> Diastolic(johnna)\nforall x (Farsighted(x) and Ilxx(x) -> Eremitic(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) and not Farsighted(x) -> not Oneiric(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) and Ilxx(x) -> not Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and not Diastolic(x) -> Wriggly(x))\n\nnot Swanky(johnna)\n\nIlxx(johnna) and Ilxx(johnna) -> Diastolic(johnna) -> therefore Diastolic(johnna) Diastolic(johnna) and Ilxx(johnna) and forall x (Diastolic(x) and Ilxx(x) -> Swanky(x)) -> therefore Swanky(johnna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Kevyn is corvine. Kevyn is not hackneyed. Kevyn is bowlegged. Kevyn is winding. Salvatore is winding. Tessa is hackneyed. Tessa is stout. Tessa is not bowlegged. Tessa is wagnerian. Tessa is uniate. Quiet people are not corvine. All corvine, winding people are bowlegged. If Salvatore is uniate and Salvatore is wagnerian then Salvatore is corvine. If Salvatore is winding then Salvatore is corvine. Quiet, winding people are stout. If someone is bowlegged and not wagnerian then they are not uniate. All bowlegged, winding people are not hackneyed. If someone is uniate and not corvine then they are hackneyed. Salvatore is not hackneyed.", "logic": "\nCorvine(kevyn)\nnot Hackneyed(kevyn)\nBowlegged(kevyn)\nWinding(kevyn)\nWinding(salvatore)\nHackneyed(tessa)\nStout(tessa)\nnot Bowlegged(tessa)\nWagnerian(tessa)\nUniate(tessa)\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) -> not Corvine(x))\nforall x (Corvine(x) and Winding(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nUniate(salvatore) and Wagnerian(salvatore) -> Corvine(salvatore)\nWinding(salvatore) -> Corvine(salvatore)\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) and Winding(x) -> Stout(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) and not Wagnerian(x) -> not Uniate(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) and Winding(x) -> not Hackneyed(x))\nforall x (Uniate(x) and not Corvine(x) -> Hackneyed(x))\n\nnot Hackneyed(salvatore)\n\nWinding(salvatore) and Winding(salvatore) -> Corvine(salvatore) -> therefore Corvine(salvatore) Corvine(salvatore) and Winding(salvatore) and forall x (Corvine(x) and Winding(x) -> Bowlegged(x)) -> therefore Bowlegged(salvatore) Bowlegged(salvatore) and Winding(salvatore) and forall x (Bowlegged(x) and Winding(x) -> not Hackneyed(x)) -> therefore not Hackneyed(salvatore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Elisha is owned. Elisha is not agone. Elisha is dusty. Elisha is viii. Pearla is viii. Calvin is agone. Calvin is nourished. Calvin is not dusty. Calvin is antitoxic. Calvin is interfaith. Quiet people are not owned. All owned, viii people are dusty. If Pearla is interfaith and Pearla is antitoxic then Pearla is owned. If Pearla is viii then Pearla is owned. Quiet, viii people are nourished. If someone is dusty and not antitoxic then they are not interfaith. All dusty, viii people are not agone. If someone is interfaith and not owned then they are agone. Pearla is agone.", "logic": "\nOwned(elisha)\nnot Agone(elisha)\nDusty(elisha)\nViii(elisha)\nViii(pearla)\nAgone(calvin)\nNourished(calvin)\nnot Dusty(calvin)\nAntitoxic(calvin)\nInterfaith(calvin)\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) -> not Owned(x))\nforall x (Owned(x) and Viii(x) -> Dusty(x))\nInterfaith(pearla) and Antitoxic(pearla) -> Owned(pearla)\nViii(pearla) -> Owned(pearla)\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) and Viii(x) -> Nourished(x))\nforall x (Dusty(x) and not Antitoxic(x) -> not Interfaith(x))\nforall x (Dusty(x) and Viii(x) -> not Agone(x))\nforall x (Interfaith(x) and not Owned(x) -> Agone(x))\n\nAgone(pearla)\n\nViii(pearla) and Viii(pearla) -> Owned(pearla) -> therefore Owned(pearla) Owned(pearla) and Viii(pearla) and forall x (Owned(x) and Viii(x) -> Dusty(x)) -> therefore Dusty(pearla) Dusty(pearla) and Viii(pearla) and forall x (Dusty(x) and Viii(x) -> not Agone(x)) -> therefore not Agone(pearla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Tyson is nonplussed. Tyson is not duplicate. Tyson is expert. Tyson is invaluable. Gaston is invaluable. Genovera is duplicate. Genovera is unseen. Genovera is not expert. Genovera is unhearing. Genovera is rateable. Quiet people are not nonplussed. All nonplussed, invaluable people are expert. If Gaston is rateable and Gaston is unhearing then Gaston is nonplussed. If Gaston is invaluable then Gaston is nonplussed. Quiet, invaluable people are unseen. If someone is expert and not unhearing then they are not rateable. All expert, invaluable people are not duplicate. If someone is rateable and not nonplussed then they are duplicate. Tyson is not unseen.", "logic": "\nNonplussed(tyson)\nnot Duplicate(tyson)\nExpert(tyson)\nInvaluable(tyson)\nInvaluable(gaston)\nDuplicate(genovera)\nUnseen(genovera)\nnot Expert(genovera)\nUnhearing(genovera)\nRateable(genovera)\nforall x (Unhearing(x) -> not Nonplussed(x))\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) and Invaluable(x) -> Expert(x))\nRateable(gaston) and Unhearing(gaston) -> Nonplussed(gaston)\nInvaluable(gaston) -> Nonplussed(gaston)\nforall x (Unhearing(x) and Invaluable(x) -> Unseen(x))\nforall x (Expert(x) and not Unhearing(x) -> not Rateable(x))\nforall x (Expert(x) and Invaluable(x) -> not Duplicate(x))\nforall x (Rateable(x) and not Nonplussed(x) -> Duplicate(x))\n\nnot Unseen(tyson)\n\nforall x (Unhearing(x) and Invaluable(x) -> Unseen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Ulrike is autistic. Ulrike is not crack. Ulrike is extendible. Ulrike is adient. Kimberlyn is adient. Anthony is crack. Anthony is mauritian. Anthony is not extendible. Anthony is inviting. Anthony is shackled. Quiet people are not autistic. All autistic, adient people are extendible. If Kimberlyn is shackled and Kimberlyn is inviting then Kimberlyn is autistic. If Kimberlyn is adient then Kimberlyn is autistic. Quiet, adient people are mauritian. If someone is extendible and not inviting then they are not shackled. All extendible, adient people are not crack. If someone is shackled and not autistic then they are crack. Kimberlyn is mauritian.", "logic": "\nAutistic(ulrike)\nnot Crack(ulrike)\nExtendible(ulrike)\nAdient(ulrike)\nAdient(kimberlyn)\nCrack(anthony)\nMauritian(anthony)\nnot Extendible(anthony)\nInviting(anthony)\nShackled(anthony)\nforall x (Inviting(x) -> not Autistic(x))\nforall x (Autistic(x) and Adient(x) -> Extendible(x))\nShackled(kimberlyn) and Inviting(kimberlyn) -> Autistic(kimberlyn)\nAdient(kimberlyn) -> Autistic(kimberlyn)\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Adient(x) -> Mauritian(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) and not Inviting(x) -> not Shackled(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Adient(x) -> not Crack(x))\nforall x (Shackled(x) and not Autistic(x) -> Crack(x))\n\nMauritian(kimberlyn)\n\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Adient(x) -> Mauritian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Raphael is aberrant. Raphael is not gracile. Raphael is cereal. Raphael is concentric. Nickolas is concentric. Felice is gracile. Felice is underlying. Felice is not cereal. Felice is uncoloured. Felice is antisocial. Quiet people are not aberrant. All aberrant, concentric people are cereal. If Nickolas is antisocial and Nickolas is uncoloured then Nickolas is aberrant. If Nickolas is concentric then Nickolas is aberrant. Quiet, concentric people are underlying. If someone is cereal and not uncoloured then they are not antisocial. All cereal, concentric people are not gracile. If someone is antisocial and not aberrant then they are gracile. Nickolas is not antisocial.", "logic": "\nAberrant(raphael)\nnot Gracile(raphael)\nCereal(raphael)\nConcentric(raphael)\nConcentric(nickolas)\nGracile(felice)\nUnderlying(felice)\nnot Cereal(felice)\nUncoloured(felice)\nAntisocial(felice)\nforall x (Uncoloured(x) -> not Aberrant(x))\nforall x (Aberrant(x) and Concentric(x) -> Cereal(x))\nAntisocial(nickolas) and Uncoloured(nickolas) -> Aberrant(nickolas)\nConcentric(nickolas) -> Aberrant(nickolas)\nforall x (Uncoloured(x) and Concentric(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) and not Uncoloured(x) -> not Antisocial(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) and Concentric(x) -> not Gracile(x))\nforall x (Antisocial(x) and not Aberrant(x) -> Gracile(x))\n\nnot Antisocial(nickolas)\n\nnot Antisocial(nickolas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Eartha is expandible. Eartha is not gutless. Eartha is plump. Eartha is spruce. Adora is spruce. Annette is gutless. Annette is capitular. Annette is not plump. Annette is manichaean. Annette is palish. Quiet people are not expandible. All expandible, spruce people are plump. If Adora is palish and Adora is manichaean then Adora is expandible. If Adora is spruce then Adora is expandible. Quiet, spruce people are capitular. If someone is plump and not manichaean then they are not palish. All plump, spruce people are not gutless. If someone is palish and not expandible then they are gutless. Eartha is palish.", "logic": "\nExpandible(eartha)\nnot Gutless(eartha)\nPlump(eartha)\nSpruce(eartha)\nSpruce(adora)\nGutless(annette)\nCapitular(annette)\nnot Plump(annette)\nManichaean(annette)\nPalish(annette)\nforall x (Manichaean(x) -> not Expandible(x))\nforall x (Expandible(x) and Spruce(x) -> Plump(x))\nPalish(adora) and Manichaean(adora) -> Expandible(adora)\nSpruce(adora) -> Expandible(adora)\nforall x (Manichaean(x) and Spruce(x) -> Capitular(x))\nforall x (Plump(x) and not Manichaean(x) -> not Palish(x))\nforall x (Plump(x) and Spruce(x) -> not Gutless(x))\nforall x (Palish(x) and not Expandible(x) -> Gutless(x))\n\nPalish(eartha)\n\nPalish(eartha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Theodore is purposive. Theodore is not amyloid. Theodore is sedate. Theodore is isocyclic. Simon is isocyclic. Janice is amyloid. Janice is salutary. Janice is not sedate. Janice is unnumbered. Janice is masterly. Quiet people are not purposive. All purposive, isocyclic people are sedate. If Simon is masterly and Simon is unnumbered then Simon is purposive. If Simon is isocyclic then Simon is purposive. Quiet, isocyclic people are salutary. If someone is sedate and not unnumbered then they are not masterly. All sedate, isocyclic people are not amyloid. If someone is masterly and not purposive then they are amyloid. Theodore is not unnumbered.", "logic": "\nPurposive(theodore)\nnot Amyloid(theodore)\nSedate(theodore)\nIsocyclic(theodore)\nIsocyclic(simon)\nAmyloid(janice)\nSalutary(janice)\nnot Sedate(janice)\nUnnumbered(janice)\nMasterly(janice)\nforall x (Unnumbered(x) -> not Purposive(x))\nforall x (Purposive(x) and Isocyclic(x) -> Sedate(x))\nMasterly(simon) and Unnumbered(simon) -> Purposive(simon)\nIsocyclic(simon) -> Purposive(simon)\nforall x (Unnumbered(x) and Isocyclic(x) -> Salutary(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) and not Unnumbered(x) -> not Masterly(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) and Isocyclic(x) -> not Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Masterly(x) and not Purposive(x) -> Amyloid(x))\n\nnot Unnumbered(theodore)\n\nnot Unnumbered(theodore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "Mitch is attached. Mitch is not dandyish. Mitch is bizonal. Mitch is dazed. Plato is dazed. Marcellus is dandyish. Marcellus is torturous. Marcellus is not bizonal. Marcellus is sufi. Marcellus is insoluble. Quiet people are not attached. All attached, dazed people are bizonal. If Plato is insoluble and Plato is sufi then Plato is attached. If Plato is dazed then Plato is attached. Quiet, dazed people are torturous. If someone is bizonal and not sufi then they are not insoluble. All bizonal, dazed people are not dandyish. If someone is insoluble and not attached then they are dandyish. Plato is sufi.", "logic": "\nAttached(mitch)\nnot Dandyish(mitch)\nBizonal(mitch)\nDazed(mitch)\nDazed(plato)\nDandyish(marcellus)\nTorturous(marcellus)\nnot Bizonal(marcellus)\nSufi(marcellus)\nInsoluble(marcellus)\nforall x (Sufi(x) -> not Attached(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Dazed(x) -> Bizonal(x))\nInsoluble(plato) and Sufi(plato) -> Attached(plato)\nDazed(plato) -> Attached(plato)\nforall x (Sufi(x) and Dazed(x) -> Torturous(x))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) and not Sufi(x) -> not Insoluble(x))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) and Dazed(x) -> not Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Insoluble(x) and not Attached(x) -> Dandyish(x))\n\nSufi(plato)\n\nSufi(plato) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1236"} {"premises": "The rube bleat the brianne. The rube does not eat the brianne. The rube is daunting. The rube is not pleasing. The rube is not moonlike. The rube cough the brianne. The brianne bleat the rube. The brianne is daunting. The brianne is not defeasible. The brianne is moonlike. If the brianne cough the rube and the brianne is not defeasible then the rube bleat the brianne. If someone cough the rube and the rube does not eat the brianne then they chase the brianne. If someone is pleasing and they eat the brianne then they chase the brianne. If someone is defending then they need the brianne. If someone mirror the rube and the rube bleat the brianne then the brianne cough the rube. If someone bleat the brianne then the brianne mirror the rube. The brianne is moonlike.", "logic": "\nBleat(rube, brianne)\nnot Mirror(rube, brianne)\nDaunting(rube)\nnot Pleasing(rube)\nnot Moonlike(rube)\nCough(rube, brianne)\nBleat(brianne, rube)\nDaunting(brianne)\nnot Defeasible(brianne)\nMoonlike(brianne)\nCough(brianne, rube) and not Defeasible(brianne) -> Bleat(rube, brianne)\nforall x (Cough(x, rube) and not Mirror(rube, brianne) -> Bleat(x, brianne))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) and Mirror(x, brianne) -> Bleat(x, brianne))\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Cough(x, brianne))\nforall x (Mirror(x, rube) and Bleat(rube, brianne) -> Cough(brianne, rube))\nforall x (Bleat(x, brianne) -> Mirror(brianne, rube))\n\nMoonlike(brianne)\n\ntherefore Moonlike(brianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The anni dull the margarita. The anni does not eat the margarita. The anni is mushy. The anni is not quasi. The anni is not callow. The anni rabbit the margarita. The margarita dull the anni. The margarita is mushy. The margarita is not engaging. The margarita is callow. If the margarita rabbit the anni and the margarita is not engaging then the anni dull the margarita. If someone rabbit the anni and the anni does not eat the margarita then they chase the margarita. If someone is quasi and they eat the margarita then they chase the margarita. If someone is casteless then they need the margarita. If someone bike the anni and the anni dull the margarita then the margarita rabbit the anni. If someone dull the margarita then the margarita bike the anni. The anni is not mushy.", "logic": "\nDull(anni, margarita)\nnot Bike(anni, margarita)\nMushy(anni)\nnot Quasi(anni)\nnot Callow(anni)\nRabbit(anni, margarita)\nDull(margarita, anni)\nMushy(margarita)\nnot Engaging(margarita)\nCallow(margarita)\nRabbit(margarita, anni) and not Engaging(margarita) -> Dull(anni, margarita)\nforall x (Rabbit(x, anni) and not Bike(anni, margarita) -> Dull(x, margarita))\nforall x (Quasi(x) and Bike(x, margarita) -> Dull(x, margarita))\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> Rabbit(x, margarita))\nforall x (Bike(x, anni) and Dull(anni, margarita) -> Rabbit(margarita, anni))\nforall x (Dull(x, margarita) -> Bike(margarita, anni))\n\nnot Mushy(anni)\n\ntherefore Mushy(anni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The aurelie storm the stearn. The aurelie does not eat the stearn. The aurelie is ungrudging. The aurelie is not inharmonic. The aurelie is not ischemic. The aurelie increase the stearn. The stearn storm the aurelie. The stearn is ungrudging. The stearn is not trifid. The stearn is ischemic. If the stearn increase the aurelie and the stearn is not trifid then the aurelie storm the stearn. If someone increase the aurelie and the aurelie does not eat the stearn then they chase the stearn. If someone is inharmonic and they eat the stearn then they chase the stearn. If someone is comestible then they need the stearn. If someone maim the aurelie and the aurelie storm the stearn then the stearn increase the aurelie. If someone storm the stearn then the stearn maim the aurelie. The stearn maim the aurelie.", "logic": "\nStorm(aurelie, stearn)\nnot Maim(aurelie, stearn)\nUngrudging(aurelie)\nnot Inharmonic(aurelie)\nnot Ischemic(aurelie)\nIncrease(aurelie, stearn)\nStorm(stearn, aurelie)\nUngrudging(stearn)\nnot Trifid(stearn)\nIschemic(stearn)\nIncrease(stearn, aurelie) and not Trifid(stearn) -> Storm(aurelie, stearn)\nforall x (Increase(x, aurelie) and not Maim(aurelie, stearn) -> Storm(x, stearn))\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) and Maim(x, stearn) -> Storm(x, stearn))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Increase(x, stearn))\nforall x (Maim(x, aurelie) and Storm(aurelie, stearn) -> Increase(stearn, aurelie))\nforall x (Storm(x, stearn) -> Maim(stearn, aurelie))\n\nMaim(stearn, aurelie)\n\nStorm(aurelie, stearn) and forall x (Storm(x, stearn) -> Maim(stearn, aurelie)) -> therefore Maim(stearn, aurelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The nananne vend the casie. The nananne does not eat the casie. The nananne is northeast. The nananne is not humoral. The nananne is not hardcore. The nananne plait the casie. The casie vend the nananne. The casie is northeast. The casie is not maintained. The casie is hardcore. If the casie plait the nananne and the casie is not maintained then the nananne vend the casie. If someone plait the nananne and the nananne does not eat the casie then they chase the casie. If someone is humoral and they eat the casie then they chase the casie. If someone is unweary then they need the casie. If someone splotch the nananne and the nananne vend the casie then the casie plait the nananne. If someone vend the casie then the casie splotch the nananne. The casie does not eat the nananne.", "logic": "\nVend(nananne, casie)\nnot Splotch(nananne, casie)\nNortheast(nananne)\nnot Humoral(nananne)\nnot Hardcore(nananne)\nPlait(nananne, casie)\nVend(casie, nananne)\nNortheast(casie)\nnot Maintained(casie)\nHardcore(casie)\nPlait(casie, nananne) and not Maintained(casie) -> Vend(nananne, casie)\nforall x (Plait(x, nananne) and not Splotch(nananne, casie) -> Vend(x, casie))\nforall x (Humoral(x) and Splotch(x, casie) -> Vend(x, casie))\nforall x (Unweary(x) -> Plait(x, casie))\nforall x (Splotch(x, nananne) and Vend(nananne, casie) -> Plait(casie, nananne))\nforall x (Vend(x, casie) -> Splotch(casie, nananne))\n\nnot Splotch(casie, nananne)\n\nVend(nananne, casie) and forall x (Vend(x, casie) -> Splotch(casie, nananne)) -> therefore Splotch(casie, nananne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The blondie rehouse the keriann. The blondie does not eat the keriann. The blondie is clever. The blondie is not transonic. The blondie is not aggravated. The blondie article the keriann. The keriann rehouse the blondie. The keriann is clever. The keriann is not total. The keriann is aggravated. If the keriann article the blondie and the keriann is not total then the blondie rehouse the keriann. If someone article the blondie and the blondie does not eat the keriann then they chase the keriann. If someone is transonic and they eat the keriann then they chase the keriann. If someone is unawed then they need the keriann. If someone thrash the blondie and the blondie rehouse the keriann then the keriann article the blondie. If someone rehouse the keriann then the keriann thrash the blondie. The keriann article the blondie.", "logic": "\nRehouse(blondie, keriann)\nnot Thrash(blondie, keriann)\nClever(blondie)\nnot Transonic(blondie)\nnot Aggravated(blondie)\nArticle(blondie, keriann)\nRehouse(keriann, blondie)\nClever(keriann)\nnot Total(keriann)\nAggravated(keriann)\nArticle(keriann, blondie) and not Total(keriann) -> Rehouse(blondie, keriann)\nforall x (Article(x, blondie) and not Thrash(blondie, keriann) -> Rehouse(x, keriann))\nforall x (Transonic(x) and Thrash(x, keriann) -> Rehouse(x, keriann))\nforall x (Unawed(x) -> Article(x, keriann))\nforall x (Thrash(x, blondie) and Rehouse(blondie, keriann) -> Article(keriann, blondie))\nforall x (Rehouse(x, keriann) -> Thrash(keriann, blondie))\n\nArticle(keriann, blondie)\n\nRehouse(blondie, keriann) and forall x (Rehouse(x, keriann) -> Thrash(keriann, blondie)) -> therefore Thrash(keriann, blondie) Thrash(keriann, blondie) and Rehouse(blondie, keriann) and forall x (Thrash(x, blondie) and Rehouse(blondie, keriann) -> Article(keriann, blondie)) -> therefore Article(keriann, blondie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The suzetta sprout the gypsy. The suzetta does not eat the gypsy. The suzetta is oldline. The suzetta is not lacerated. The suzetta is not antitypic. The suzetta relate the gypsy. The gypsy sprout the suzetta. The gypsy is oldline. The gypsy is not hadal. The gypsy is antitypic. If the gypsy relate the suzetta and the gypsy is not hadal then the suzetta sprout the gypsy. If someone relate the suzetta and the suzetta does not eat the gypsy then they chase the gypsy. If someone is lacerated and they eat the gypsy then they chase the gypsy. If someone is upcurved then they need the gypsy. If someone vest the suzetta and the suzetta sprout the gypsy then the gypsy relate the suzetta. If someone sprout the gypsy then the gypsy vest the suzetta. The gypsy does not need the suzetta.", "logic": "\nSprout(suzetta, gypsy)\nnot Vest(suzetta, gypsy)\nOldline(suzetta)\nnot Lacerated(suzetta)\nnot Antitypic(suzetta)\nRelate(suzetta, gypsy)\nSprout(gypsy, suzetta)\nOldline(gypsy)\nnot Hadal(gypsy)\nAntitypic(gypsy)\nRelate(gypsy, suzetta) and not Hadal(gypsy) -> Sprout(suzetta, gypsy)\nforall x (Relate(x, suzetta) and not Vest(suzetta, gypsy) -> Sprout(x, gypsy))\nforall x (Lacerated(x) and Vest(x, gypsy) -> Sprout(x, gypsy))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) -> Relate(x, gypsy))\nforall x (Vest(x, suzetta) and Sprout(suzetta, gypsy) -> Relate(gypsy, suzetta))\nforall x (Sprout(x, gypsy) -> Vest(gypsy, suzetta))\n\nnot Relate(gypsy, suzetta)\n\nSprout(suzetta, gypsy) and forall x (Sprout(x, gypsy) -> Vest(gypsy, suzetta)) -> therefore Vest(gypsy, suzetta) Vest(gypsy, suzetta) and Sprout(suzetta, gypsy) and forall x (Vest(x, suzetta) and Sprout(suzetta, gypsy) -> Relate(gypsy, suzetta)) -> therefore Relate(gypsy, suzetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The janine approbate the crysta. The janine does not eat the crysta. The janine is riskless. The janine is not notched. The janine is not unresolved. The janine pursue the crysta. The crysta approbate the janine. The crysta is riskless. The crysta is not galvanic. The crysta is unresolved. If the crysta pursue the janine and the crysta is not galvanic then the janine approbate the crysta. If someone pursue the janine and the janine does not eat the crysta then they chase the crysta. If someone is notched and they eat the crysta then they chase the crysta. If someone is buttonlike then they need the crysta. If someone precess the janine and the janine approbate the crysta then the crysta pursue the janine. If someone approbate the crysta then the crysta precess the janine. The crysta approbate the crysta.", "logic": "\nApprobate(janine, crysta)\nnot Precess(janine, crysta)\nRiskless(janine)\nnot Notched(janine)\nnot Unresolved(janine)\nPursue(janine, crysta)\nApprobate(crysta, janine)\nRiskless(crysta)\nnot Galvanic(crysta)\nUnresolved(crysta)\nPursue(crysta, janine) and not Galvanic(crysta) -> Approbate(janine, crysta)\nforall x (Pursue(x, janine) and not Precess(janine, crysta) -> Approbate(x, crysta))\nforall x (Notched(x) and Precess(x, crysta) -> Approbate(x, crysta))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Pursue(x, crysta))\nforall x (Precess(x, janine) and Approbate(janine, crysta) -> Pursue(crysta, janine))\nforall x (Approbate(x, crysta) -> Precess(crysta, janine))\n\nApprobate(crysta, crysta)\n\nApprobate(janine, crysta) and forall x (Approbate(x, crysta) -> Precess(crysta, janine)) -> therefore Precess(crysta, janine) Precess(crysta, janine) and Approbate(janine, crysta) and forall x (Precess(x, janine) and Approbate(janine, crysta) -> Pursue(crysta, janine)) -> therefore Pursue(crysta, janine) Pursue(crysta, janine) and not Precess(janine, crysta) and forall x (Pursue(x, janine) and not Precess(janine, crysta) -> Approbate(x, crysta)) -> therefore Approbate(crysta, crysta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The ashlee convolute the roch. The ashlee does not eat the roch. The ashlee is sweptback. The ashlee is not untrodden. The ashlee is not broadside. The ashlee elate the roch. The roch convolute the ashlee. The roch is sweptback. The roch is not ploughed. The roch is broadside. If the roch elate the ashlee and the roch is not ploughed then the ashlee convolute the roch. If someone elate the ashlee and the ashlee does not eat the roch then they chase the roch. If someone is untrodden and they eat the roch then they chase the roch. If someone is allomerous then they need the roch. If someone drag the ashlee and the ashlee convolute the roch then the roch elate the ashlee. If someone convolute the roch then the roch drag the ashlee. The roch does not chase the roch.", "logic": "\nConvolute(ashlee, roch)\nnot Drag(ashlee, roch)\nSweptback(ashlee)\nnot Untrodden(ashlee)\nnot Broadside(ashlee)\nElate(ashlee, roch)\nConvolute(roch, ashlee)\nSweptback(roch)\nnot Ploughed(roch)\nBroadside(roch)\nElate(roch, ashlee) and not Ploughed(roch) -> Convolute(ashlee, roch)\nforall x (Elate(x, ashlee) and not Drag(ashlee, roch) -> Convolute(x, roch))\nforall x (Untrodden(x) and Drag(x, roch) -> Convolute(x, roch))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) -> Elate(x, roch))\nforall x (Drag(x, ashlee) and Convolute(ashlee, roch) -> Elate(roch, ashlee))\nforall x (Convolute(x, roch) -> Drag(roch, ashlee))\n\nnot Convolute(roch, roch)\n\nConvolute(ashlee, roch) and forall x (Convolute(x, roch) -> Drag(roch, ashlee)) -> therefore Drag(roch, ashlee) Drag(roch, ashlee) and Convolute(ashlee, roch) and forall x (Drag(x, ashlee) and Convolute(ashlee, roch) -> Elate(roch, ashlee)) -> therefore Elate(roch, ashlee) Elate(roch, ashlee) and not Drag(ashlee, roch) and forall x (Elate(x, ashlee) and not Drag(ashlee, roch) -> Convolute(x, roch)) -> therefore Convolute(roch, roch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The kakalina hurtle the yelena. The kakalina does not eat the yelena. The kakalina is riled. The kakalina is not blanket. The kakalina is not narial. The kakalina jibe the yelena. The yelena hurtle the kakalina. The yelena is riled. The yelena is not snazzy. The yelena is narial. If the yelena jibe the kakalina and the yelena is not snazzy then the kakalina hurtle the yelena. If someone jibe the kakalina and the kakalina does not eat the yelena then they chase the yelena. If someone is blanket and they eat the yelena then they chase the yelena. If someone is ritual then they need the yelena. If someone convene the kakalina and the kakalina hurtle the yelena then the yelena jibe the kakalina. If someone hurtle the yelena then the yelena convene the kakalina. The yelena does not need the yelena.", "logic": "\nHurtle(kakalina, yelena)\nnot Convene(kakalina, yelena)\nRiled(kakalina)\nnot Blanket(kakalina)\nnot Narial(kakalina)\nJibe(kakalina, yelena)\nHurtle(yelena, kakalina)\nRiled(yelena)\nnot Snazzy(yelena)\nNarial(yelena)\nJibe(yelena, kakalina) and not Snazzy(yelena) -> Hurtle(kakalina, yelena)\nforall x (Jibe(x, kakalina) and not Convene(kakalina, yelena) -> Hurtle(x, yelena))\nforall x (Blanket(x) and Convene(x, yelena) -> Hurtle(x, yelena))\nforall x (Ritual(x) -> Jibe(x, yelena))\nforall x (Convene(x, kakalina) and Hurtle(kakalina, yelena) -> Jibe(yelena, kakalina))\nforall x (Hurtle(x, yelena) -> Convene(yelena, kakalina))\n\nnot Jibe(yelena, yelena)\n\nforall x (Ritual(x) -> Jibe(x, yelena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The carmel imitate the adolfo. The carmel does not eat the adolfo. The carmel is conveyable. The carmel is not concordant. The carmel is not overactive. The carmel cinch the adolfo. The adolfo imitate the carmel. The adolfo is conveyable. The adolfo is not mishnaic. The adolfo is overactive. If the adolfo cinch the carmel and the adolfo is not mishnaic then the carmel imitate the adolfo. If someone cinch the carmel and the carmel does not eat the adolfo then they chase the adolfo. If someone is concordant and they eat the adolfo then they chase the adolfo. If someone is polytonal then they need the adolfo. If someone seed the carmel and the carmel imitate the adolfo then the adolfo cinch the carmel. If someone imitate the adolfo then the adolfo seed the carmel. The carmel seed the carmel.", "logic": "\nImitate(carmel, adolfo)\nnot Seed(carmel, adolfo)\nConveyable(carmel)\nnot Concordant(carmel)\nnot Overactive(carmel)\nCinch(carmel, adolfo)\nImitate(adolfo, carmel)\nConveyable(adolfo)\nnot Mishnaic(adolfo)\nOveractive(adolfo)\nCinch(adolfo, carmel) and not Mishnaic(adolfo) -> Imitate(carmel, adolfo)\nforall x (Cinch(x, carmel) and not Seed(carmel, adolfo) -> Imitate(x, adolfo))\nforall x (Concordant(x) and Seed(x, adolfo) -> Imitate(x, adolfo))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Cinch(x, adolfo))\nforall x (Seed(x, carmel) and Imitate(carmel, adolfo) -> Cinch(adolfo, carmel))\nforall x (Imitate(x, adolfo) -> Seed(adolfo, carmel))\n\nSeed(carmel, carmel)\n\nSeed(carmel, carmel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The sabra guard the hartley. The sabra does not eat the hartley. The sabra is crusty. The sabra is not ruttish. The sabra is not episcopal. The sabra parody the hartley. The hartley guard the sabra. The hartley is crusty. The hartley is not roumanian. The hartley is episcopal. If the hartley parody the sabra and the hartley is not roumanian then the sabra guard the hartley. If someone parody the sabra and the sabra does not eat the hartley then they chase the hartley. If someone is ruttish and they eat the hartley then they chase the hartley. If someone is sensual then they need the hartley. If someone quieten the sabra and the sabra guard the hartley then the hartley parody the sabra. If someone guard the hartley then the hartley quieten the sabra. The sabra does not chase the sabra.", "logic": "\nGuard(sabra, hartley)\nnot Quieten(sabra, hartley)\nCrusty(sabra)\nnot Ruttish(sabra)\nnot Episcopal(sabra)\nParody(sabra, hartley)\nGuard(hartley, sabra)\nCrusty(hartley)\nnot Roumanian(hartley)\nEpiscopal(hartley)\nParody(hartley, sabra) and not Roumanian(hartley) -> Guard(sabra, hartley)\nforall x (Parody(x, sabra) and not Quieten(sabra, hartley) -> Guard(x, hartley))\nforall x (Ruttish(x) and Quieten(x, hartley) -> Guard(x, hartley))\nforall x (Sensual(x) -> Parody(x, hartley))\nforall x (Quieten(x, sabra) and Guard(sabra, hartley) -> Parody(hartley, sabra))\nforall x (Guard(x, hartley) -> Quieten(hartley, sabra))\n\nnot Guard(sabra, sabra)\n\nnot Guard(sabra, sabra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The micaela limber the ferne. The micaela does not eat the ferne. The micaela is biserrate. The micaela is not acoustic. The micaela is not stillborn. The micaela faze the ferne. The ferne limber the micaela. The ferne is biserrate. The ferne is not briton. The ferne is stillborn. If the ferne faze the micaela and the ferne is not briton then the micaela limber the ferne. If someone faze the micaela and the micaela does not eat the ferne then they chase the ferne. If someone is acoustic and they eat the ferne then they chase the ferne. If someone is genetic then they need the ferne. If someone vein the micaela and the micaela limber the ferne then the ferne faze the micaela. If someone limber the ferne then the ferne vein the micaela. The ferne is genetic.", "logic": "\nLimber(micaela, ferne)\nnot Vein(micaela, ferne)\nBiserrate(micaela)\nnot Acoustic(micaela)\nnot Stillborn(micaela)\nFaze(micaela, ferne)\nLimber(ferne, micaela)\nBiserrate(ferne)\nnot Briton(ferne)\nStillborn(ferne)\nFaze(ferne, micaela) and not Briton(ferne) -> Limber(micaela, ferne)\nforall x (Faze(x, micaela) and not Vein(micaela, ferne) -> Limber(x, ferne))\nforall x (Acoustic(x) and Vein(x, ferne) -> Limber(x, ferne))\nforall x (Genetic(x) -> Faze(x, ferne))\nforall x (Vein(x, micaela) and Limber(micaela, ferne) -> Faze(ferne, micaela))\nforall x (Limber(x, ferne) -> Vein(ferne, micaela))\n\nGenetic(ferne)\n\nGenetic(ferne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The skelly unseat the lena. The skelly does not eat the lena. The skelly is freehanded. The skelly is not secular. The skelly is not islamic. The skelly disarray the lena. The lena unseat the skelly. The lena is freehanded. The lena is not depicted. The lena is islamic. If the lena disarray the skelly and the lena is not depicted then the skelly unseat the lena. If someone disarray the skelly and the skelly does not eat the lena then they chase the lena. If someone is secular and they eat the lena then they chase the lena. If someone is intertidal then they need the lena. If someone troop the skelly and the skelly unseat the lena then the lena disarray the skelly. If someone unseat the lena then the lena troop the skelly. The skelly is not intertidal.", "logic": "\nUnseat(skelly, lena)\nnot Troop(skelly, lena)\nFreehanded(skelly)\nnot Secular(skelly)\nnot Islamic(skelly)\nDisarray(skelly, lena)\nUnseat(lena, skelly)\nFreehanded(lena)\nnot Depicted(lena)\nIslamic(lena)\nDisarray(lena, skelly) and not Depicted(lena) -> Unseat(skelly, lena)\nforall x (Disarray(x, skelly) and not Troop(skelly, lena) -> Unseat(x, lena))\nforall x (Secular(x) and Troop(x, lena) -> Unseat(x, lena))\nforall x (Intertidal(x) -> Disarray(x, lena))\nforall x (Troop(x, skelly) and Unseat(skelly, lena) -> Disarray(lena, skelly))\nforall x (Unseat(x, lena) -> Troop(lena, skelly))\n\nnot Intertidal(skelly)\n\nnot Intertidal(skelly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The adoree assert the enya. The adoree does not eat the enya. The adoree is drugless. The adoree is not chivalric. The adoree is not rachitic. The adoree bituminize the enya. The enya assert the adoree. The enya is drugless. The enya is not rumansh. The enya is rachitic. If the enya bituminize the adoree and the enya is not rumansh then the adoree assert the enya. If someone bituminize the adoree and the adoree does not eat the enya then they chase the enya. If someone is chivalric and they eat the enya then they chase the enya. If someone is epicarpal then they need the enya. If someone mortise the adoree and the adoree assert the enya then the enya bituminize the adoree. If someone assert the enya then the enya mortise the adoree. The adoree is rumansh.", "logic": "\nAssert(adoree, enya)\nnot Mortise(adoree, enya)\nDrugless(adoree)\nnot Chivalric(adoree)\nnot Rachitic(adoree)\nBituminize(adoree, enya)\nAssert(enya, adoree)\nDrugless(enya)\nnot Rumansh(enya)\nRachitic(enya)\nBituminize(enya, adoree) and not Rumansh(enya) -> Assert(adoree, enya)\nforall x (Bituminize(x, adoree) and not Mortise(adoree, enya) -> Assert(x, enya))\nforall x (Chivalric(x) and Mortise(x, enya) -> Assert(x, enya))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) -> Bituminize(x, enya))\nforall x (Mortise(x, adoree) and Assert(adoree, enya) -> Bituminize(enya, adoree))\nforall x (Assert(x, enya) -> Mortise(enya, adoree))\n\nRumansh(adoree)\n\nRumansh(adoree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The zilvia eschew the taryn. The zilvia does not eat the taryn. The zilvia is icky. The zilvia is not sylphlike. The zilvia is not ataxic. The zilvia misplace the taryn. The taryn eschew the zilvia. The taryn is icky. The taryn is not listed. The taryn is ataxic. If the taryn misplace the zilvia and the taryn is not listed then the zilvia eschew the taryn. If someone misplace the zilvia and the zilvia does not eat the taryn then they chase the taryn. If someone is sylphlike and they eat the taryn then they chase the taryn. If someone is unusual then they need the taryn. If someone phonate the zilvia and the zilvia eschew the taryn then the taryn misplace the zilvia. If someone eschew the taryn then the taryn phonate the zilvia. The taryn is not sylphlike.", "logic": "\nEschew(zilvia, taryn)\nnot Phonate(zilvia, taryn)\nIcky(zilvia)\nnot Sylphlike(zilvia)\nnot Ataxic(zilvia)\nMisplace(zilvia, taryn)\nEschew(taryn, zilvia)\nIcky(taryn)\nnot Listed(taryn)\nAtaxic(taryn)\nMisplace(taryn, zilvia) and not Listed(taryn) -> Eschew(zilvia, taryn)\nforall x (Misplace(x, zilvia) and not Phonate(zilvia, taryn) -> Eschew(x, taryn))\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) and Phonate(x, taryn) -> Eschew(x, taryn))\nforall x (Unusual(x) -> Misplace(x, taryn))\nforall x (Phonate(x, zilvia) and Eschew(zilvia, taryn) -> Misplace(taryn, zilvia))\nforall x (Eschew(x, taryn) -> Phonate(taryn, zilvia))\n\nnot Sylphlike(taryn)\n\nnot Sylphlike(taryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The dorian edulcorate the vicki. The dorian does not eat the vicki. The dorian is layered. The dorian is not bearing. The dorian is not nifty. The dorian wholesale the vicki. The vicki edulcorate the dorian. The vicki is layered. The vicki is not brambly. The vicki is nifty. If the vicki wholesale the dorian and the vicki is not brambly then the dorian edulcorate the vicki. If someone wholesale the dorian and the dorian does not eat the vicki then they chase the vicki. If someone is bearing and they eat the vicki then they chase the vicki. If someone is tobagonian then they need the vicki. If someone gallop the dorian and the dorian edulcorate the vicki then the vicki wholesale the dorian. If someone edulcorate the vicki then the vicki gallop the dorian. The vicki gallop the vicki.", "logic": "\nEdulcorate(dorian, vicki)\nnot Gallop(dorian, vicki)\nLayered(dorian)\nnot Bearing(dorian)\nnot Nifty(dorian)\nWholesale(dorian, vicki)\nEdulcorate(vicki, dorian)\nLayered(vicki)\nnot Brambly(vicki)\nNifty(vicki)\nWholesale(vicki, dorian) and not Brambly(vicki) -> Edulcorate(dorian, vicki)\nforall x (Wholesale(x, dorian) and not Gallop(dorian, vicki) -> Edulcorate(x, vicki))\nforall x (Bearing(x) and Gallop(x, vicki) -> Edulcorate(x, vicki))\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Wholesale(x, vicki))\nforall x (Gallop(x, dorian) and Edulcorate(dorian, vicki) -> Wholesale(vicki, dorian))\nforall x (Edulcorate(x, vicki) -> Gallop(vicki, dorian))\n\nGallop(vicki, vicki)\n\nGallop(vicki, vicki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1127"} {"premises": "The abraham luminesce the inesita. The abraham is plumy. The abraham is dominating. The abraham unhinge the inesita. The abraham relate the inesita. The inesita luminesce the abraham. The inesita is plumy. The inesita is dominating. The inesita is cubist. The inesita is lawful. The inesita unhinge the abraham. The inesita relate the abraham. If something unhinge the inesita and it relate the abraham then the abraham luminesce the inesita. If something is plumy then it is donnian. If something luminesce the abraham and it unhinge the abraham then the abraham unhinge the inesita. If something is donnian and cubist then it relate the inesita. If something relate the abraham then the abraham luminesce the inesita. If something relate the inesita then it luminesce the inesita. The inesita unhinge the abraham.", "logic": "\nLuminesce(abraham, inesita)\nPlumy(abraham)\nDominating(abraham)\nUnhinge(abraham, inesita)\nRelate(abraham, inesita)\nLuminesce(inesita, abraham)\nPlumy(inesita)\nDominating(inesita)\nCubist(inesita)\nLawful(inesita)\nUnhinge(inesita, abraham)\nRelate(inesita, abraham)\nforall x (Unhinge(x, inesita) and Relate(x, abraham) -> Luminesce(abraham, inesita))\nforall x (Plumy(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Luminesce(x, abraham) and Unhinge(x, abraham) -> Unhinge(abraham, inesita))\nforall x (Donnian(x) and Cubist(x) -> Relate(x, inesita))\nforall x (Relate(x, abraham) -> Luminesce(abraham, inesita))\nforall x (Relate(x, inesita) -> Luminesce(x, inesita))\n\nUnhinge(inesita, abraham)\n\ntherefore Unhinge(inesita, abraham)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The theo instigate the stanley. The theo is semisoft. The theo is deathlike. The theo clarify the stanley. The theo puree the stanley. The stanley instigate the theo. The stanley is semisoft. The stanley is deathlike. The stanley is hereditary. The stanley is expansible. The stanley clarify the theo. The stanley puree the theo. If something clarify the stanley and it puree the theo then the theo instigate the stanley. If something is semisoft then it is unpeopled. If something instigate the theo and it clarify the theo then the theo clarify the stanley. If something is unpeopled and hereditary then it puree the stanley. If something puree the theo then the theo instigate the stanley. If something puree the stanley then it instigate the stanley. The stanley is not semisoft.", "logic": "\nInstigate(theo, stanley)\nSemisoft(theo)\nDeathlike(theo)\nClarify(theo, stanley)\nPuree(theo, stanley)\nInstigate(stanley, theo)\nSemisoft(stanley)\nDeathlike(stanley)\nHereditary(stanley)\nExpansible(stanley)\nClarify(stanley, theo)\nPuree(stanley, theo)\nforall x (Clarify(x, stanley) and Puree(x, theo) -> Instigate(theo, stanley))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Unpeopled(x))\nforall x (Instigate(x, theo) and Clarify(x, theo) -> Clarify(theo, stanley))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) and Hereditary(x) -> Puree(x, stanley))\nforall x (Puree(x, theo) -> Instigate(theo, stanley))\nforall x (Puree(x, stanley) -> Instigate(x, stanley))\n\nnot Semisoft(stanley)\n\ntherefore Semisoft(stanley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The taffy grubstake the daphna. The taffy is xxxvii. The taffy is woodsy. The taffy dismay the daphna. The taffy goggle the daphna. The daphna grubstake the taffy. The daphna is xxxvii. The daphna is woodsy. The daphna is cultural. The daphna is pleonastic. The daphna dismay the taffy. The daphna goggle the taffy. If something dismay the daphna and it goggle the taffy then the taffy grubstake the daphna. If something is xxxvii then it is onerous. If something grubstake the taffy and it dismay the taffy then the taffy dismay the daphna. If something is onerous and cultural then it goggle the daphna. If something goggle the taffy then the taffy grubstake the daphna. If something goggle the daphna then it grubstake the daphna. The daphna is onerous.", "logic": "\nGrubstake(taffy, daphna)\nXxxvii(taffy)\nWoodsy(taffy)\nDismay(taffy, daphna)\nGoggle(taffy, daphna)\nGrubstake(daphna, taffy)\nXxxvii(daphna)\nWoodsy(daphna)\nCultural(daphna)\nPleonastic(daphna)\nDismay(daphna, taffy)\nGoggle(daphna, taffy)\nforall x (Dismay(x, daphna) and Goggle(x, taffy) -> Grubstake(taffy, daphna))\nforall x (Xxxvii(x) -> Onerous(x))\nforall x (Grubstake(x, taffy) and Dismay(x, taffy) -> Dismay(taffy, daphna))\nforall x (Onerous(x) and Cultural(x) -> Goggle(x, daphna))\nforall x (Goggle(x, taffy) -> Grubstake(taffy, daphna))\nforall x (Goggle(x, daphna) -> Grubstake(x, daphna))\n\nOnerous(daphna)\n\nXxxvii(daphna) and forall x (Xxxvii(x) -> Onerous(x)) -> therefore Onerous(daphna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The lola memorize the carolynn. The lola is main. The lola is palatable. The lola certify the carolynn. The lola coerce the carolynn. The carolynn memorize the lola. The carolynn is main. The carolynn is palatable. The carolynn is laic. The carolynn is forgiving. The carolynn certify the lola. The carolynn coerce the lola. If something certify the carolynn and it coerce the lola then the lola memorize the carolynn. If something is main then it is accessary. If something memorize the lola and it certify the lola then the lola certify the carolynn. If something is accessary and laic then it coerce the carolynn. If something coerce the lola then the lola memorize the carolynn. If something coerce the carolynn then it memorize the carolynn. The lola is not accessary.", "logic": "\nMemorize(lola, carolynn)\nMain(lola)\nPalatable(lola)\nCertify(lola, carolynn)\nCoerce(lola, carolynn)\nMemorize(carolynn, lola)\nMain(carolynn)\nPalatable(carolynn)\nLaic(carolynn)\nForgiving(carolynn)\nCertify(carolynn, lola)\nCoerce(carolynn, lola)\nforall x (Certify(x, carolynn) and Coerce(x, lola) -> Memorize(lola, carolynn))\nforall x (Main(x) -> Accessary(x))\nforall x (Memorize(x, lola) and Certify(x, lola) -> Certify(lola, carolynn))\nforall x (Accessary(x) and Laic(x) -> Coerce(x, carolynn))\nforall x (Coerce(x, lola) -> Memorize(lola, carolynn))\nforall x (Coerce(x, carolynn) -> Memorize(x, carolynn))\n\nnot Accessary(lola)\n\nMain(lola) and forall x (Main(x) -> Accessary(x)) -> therefore Accessary(lola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The carmita ascertain the maurita. The carmita is prenuptial. The carmita is semisweet. The carmita larn the maurita. The carmita snicker the maurita. The maurita ascertain the carmita. The maurita is prenuptial. The maurita is semisweet. The maurita is accepting. The maurita is veined. The maurita larn the carmita. The maurita snicker the carmita. If something larn the maurita and it snicker the carmita then the carmita ascertain the maurita. If something is prenuptial then it is gelatinous. If something ascertain the carmita and it larn the carmita then the carmita larn the maurita. If something is gelatinous and accepting then it snicker the maurita. If something snicker the carmita then the carmita ascertain the maurita. If something snicker the maurita then it ascertain the maurita. The maurita snicker the maurita.", "logic": "\nAscertain(carmita, maurita)\nPrenuptial(carmita)\nSemisweet(carmita)\nLarn(carmita, maurita)\nSnicker(carmita, maurita)\nAscertain(maurita, carmita)\nPrenuptial(maurita)\nSemisweet(maurita)\nAccepting(maurita)\nVeined(maurita)\nLarn(maurita, carmita)\nSnicker(maurita, carmita)\nforall x (Larn(x, maurita) and Snicker(x, carmita) -> Ascertain(carmita, maurita))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) -> Gelatinous(x))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, carmita) and Larn(x, carmita) -> Larn(carmita, maurita))\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) and Accepting(x) -> Snicker(x, maurita))\nforall x (Snicker(x, carmita) -> Ascertain(carmita, maurita))\nforall x (Snicker(x, maurita) -> Ascertain(x, maurita))\n\nSnicker(maurita, maurita)\n\nPrenuptial(maurita) and forall x (Prenuptial(x) -> Gelatinous(x)) -> therefore Gelatinous(maurita) Gelatinous(maurita) and Accepting(maurita) and forall x (Gelatinous(x) and Accepting(x) -> Snicker(x, maurita)) -> therefore Snicker(maurita, maurita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The scarlett bourgeon the margarete. The scarlett is pierced. The scarlett is variant. The scarlett vellicate the margarete. The scarlett model the margarete. The margarete bourgeon the scarlett. The margarete is pierced. The margarete is variant. The margarete is bauxitic. The margarete is spheric. The margarete vellicate the scarlett. The margarete model the scarlett. If something vellicate the margarete and it model the scarlett then the scarlett bourgeon the margarete. If something is pierced then it is stippled. If something bourgeon the scarlett and it vellicate the scarlett then the scarlett vellicate the margarete. If something is stippled and bauxitic then it model the margarete. If something model the scarlett then the scarlett bourgeon the margarete. If something model the margarete then it bourgeon the margarete. The margarete does not need the margarete.", "logic": "\nBourgeon(scarlett, margarete)\nPierced(scarlett)\nVariant(scarlett)\nVellicate(scarlett, margarete)\nModel(scarlett, margarete)\nBourgeon(margarete, scarlett)\nPierced(margarete)\nVariant(margarete)\nBauxitic(margarete)\nSpheric(margarete)\nVellicate(margarete, scarlett)\nModel(margarete, scarlett)\nforall x (Vellicate(x, margarete) and Model(x, scarlett) -> Bourgeon(scarlett, margarete))\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Stippled(x))\nforall x (Bourgeon(x, scarlett) and Vellicate(x, scarlett) -> Vellicate(scarlett, margarete))\nforall x (Stippled(x) and Bauxitic(x) -> Model(x, margarete))\nforall x (Model(x, scarlett) -> Bourgeon(scarlett, margarete))\nforall x (Model(x, margarete) -> Bourgeon(x, margarete))\n\nnot Model(margarete, margarete)\n\nPierced(margarete) and forall x (Pierced(x) -> Stippled(x)) -> therefore Stippled(margarete) Stippled(margarete) and Bauxitic(margarete) and forall x (Stippled(x) and Bauxitic(x) -> Model(x, margarete)) -> therefore Model(margarete, margarete)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The vivien forage the connie. The vivien is slurred. The vivien is lucifugal. The vivien pump the connie. The vivien lyric the connie. The connie forage the vivien. The connie is slurred. The connie is lucifugal. The connie is quickset. The connie is uproarious. The connie pump the vivien. The connie lyric the vivien. If something pump the connie and it lyric the vivien then the vivien forage the connie. If something is slurred then it is wrapped. If something forage the vivien and it pump the vivien then the vivien pump the connie. If something is wrapped and quickset then it lyric the connie. If something lyric the vivien then the vivien forage the connie. If something lyric the connie then it forage the connie. The connie forage the connie.", "logic": "\nForage(vivien, connie)\nSlurred(vivien)\nLucifugal(vivien)\nPump(vivien, connie)\nLyric(vivien, connie)\nForage(connie, vivien)\nSlurred(connie)\nLucifugal(connie)\nQuickset(connie)\nUproarious(connie)\nPump(connie, vivien)\nLyric(connie, vivien)\nforall x (Pump(x, connie) and Lyric(x, vivien) -> Forage(vivien, connie))\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Wrapped(x))\nforall x (Forage(x, vivien) and Pump(x, vivien) -> Pump(vivien, connie))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) and Quickset(x) -> Lyric(x, connie))\nforall x (Lyric(x, vivien) -> Forage(vivien, connie))\nforall x (Lyric(x, connie) -> Forage(x, connie))\n\nForage(connie, connie)\n\nSlurred(connie) and forall x (Slurred(x) -> Wrapped(x)) -> therefore Wrapped(connie) Wrapped(connie) and Quickset(connie) and forall x (Wrapped(x) and Quickset(x) -> Lyric(x, connie)) -> therefore Lyric(connie, connie) Lyric(connie, connie) and forall x (Lyric(x, connie) -> Forage(x, connie)) -> therefore Forage(connie, connie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The kathlin spook the lanna. The kathlin is vaccinated. The kathlin is futuristic. The kathlin inhibit the lanna. The kathlin poultice the lanna. The lanna spook the kathlin. The lanna is vaccinated. The lanna is futuristic. The lanna is brooding. The lanna is unskilled. The lanna inhibit the kathlin. The lanna poultice the kathlin. If something inhibit the lanna and it poultice the kathlin then the kathlin spook the lanna. If something is vaccinated then it is greenhouse. If something spook the kathlin and it inhibit the kathlin then the kathlin inhibit the lanna. If something is greenhouse and brooding then it poultice the lanna. If something poultice the kathlin then the kathlin spook the lanna. If something poultice the lanna then it spook the lanna. The lanna does not chase the lanna.", "logic": "\nSpook(kathlin, lanna)\nVaccinated(kathlin)\nFuturistic(kathlin)\nInhibit(kathlin, lanna)\nPoultice(kathlin, lanna)\nSpook(lanna, kathlin)\nVaccinated(lanna)\nFuturistic(lanna)\nBrooding(lanna)\nUnskilled(lanna)\nInhibit(lanna, kathlin)\nPoultice(lanna, kathlin)\nforall x (Inhibit(x, lanna) and Poultice(x, kathlin) -> Spook(kathlin, lanna))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Greenhouse(x))\nforall x (Spook(x, kathlin) and Inhibit(x, kathlin) -> Inhibit(kathlin, lanna))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) and Brooding(x) -> Poultice(x, lanna))\nforall x (Poultice(x, kathlin) -> Spook(kathlin, lanna))\nforall x (Poultice(x, lanna) -> Spook(x, lanna))\n\nnot Spook(lanna, lanna)\n\nVaccinated(lanna) and forall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Greenhouse(x)) -> therefore Greenhouse(lanna) Greenhouse(lanna) and Brooding(lanna) and forall x (Greenhouse(x) and Brooding(x) -> Poultice(x, lanna)) -> therefore Poultice(lanna, lanna) Poultice(lanna, lanna) and forall x (Poultice(x, lanna) -> Spook(x, lanna)) -> therefore Spook(lanna, lanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The shoshana alcoholize the karon. The shoshana is elysian. The shoshana is stretchy. The shoshana monetise the karon. The shoshana excel the karon. The karon alcoholize the shoshana. The karon is elysian. The karon is stretchy. The karon is unactable. The karon is poorly. The karon monetise the shoshana. The karon excel the shoshana. If something monetise the karon and it excel the shoshana then the shoshana alcoholize the karon. If something is elysian then it is clashing. If something alcoholize the shoshana and it monetise the shoshana then the shoshana monetise the karon. If something is clashing and unactable then it excel the karon. If something excel the shoshana then the shoshana alcoholize the karon. If something excel the karon then it alcoholize the karon. The shoshana does not like the shoshana.", "logic": "\nAlcoholize(shoshana, karon)\nElysian(shoshana)\nStretchy(shoshana)\nMonetise(shoshana, karon)\nExcel(shoshana, karon)\nAlcoholize(karon, shoshana)\nElysian(karon)\nStretchy(karon)\nUnactable(karon)\nPoorly(karon)\nMonetise(karon, shoshana)\nExcel(karon, shoshana)\nforall x (Monetise(x, karon) and Excel(x, shoshana) -> Alcoholize(shoshana, karon))\nforall x (Elysian(x) -> Clashing(x))\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, shoshana) and Monetise(x, shoshana) -> Monetise(shoshana, karon))\nforall x (Clashing(x) and Unactable(x) -> Excel(x, karon))\nforall x (Excel(x, shoshana) -> Alcoholize(shoshana, karon))\nforall x (Excel(x, karon) -> Alcoholize(x, karon))\n\nnot Monetise(shoshana, shoshana)\n\nnot Monetise(shoshana, shoshana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The adoree stuff the nonnah. The adoree is mottled. The adoree is burbly. The adoree mambo the nonnah. The adoree budge the nonnah. The nonnah stuff the adoree. The nonnah is mottled. The nonnah is burbly. The nonnah is obsequious. The nonnah is syntactic. The nonnah mambo the adoree. The nonnah budge the adoree. If something mambo the nonnah and it budge the adoree then the adoree stuff the nonnah. If something is mottled then it is siamese. If something stuff the adoree and it mambo the adoree then the adoree mambo the nonnah. If something is siamese and obsequious then it budge the nonnah. If something budge the adoree then the adoree stuff the nonnah. If something budge the nonnah then it stuff the nonnah. The adoree budge the adoree.", "logic": "\nStuff(adoree, nonnah)\nMottled(adoree)\nBurbly(adoree)\nMambo(adoree, nonnah)\nBudge(adoree, nonnah)\nStuff(nonnah, adoree)\nMottled(nonnah)\nBurbly(nonnah)\nObsequious(nonnah)\nSyntactic(nonnah)\nMambo(nonnah, adoree)\nBudge(nonnah, adoree)\nforall x (Mambo(x, nonnah) and Budge(x, adoree) -> Stuff(adoree, nonnah))\nforall x (Mottled(x) -> Siamese(x))\nforall x (Stuff(x, adoree) and Mambo(x, adoree) -> Mambo(adoree, nonnah))\nforall x (Siamese(x) and Obsequious(x) -> Budge(x, nonnah))\nforall x (Budge(x, adoree) -> Stuff(adoree, nonnah))\nforall x (Budge(x, nonnah) -> Stuff(x, nonnah))\n\nBudge(adoree, adoree)\n\nBudge(adoree, adoree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The rhianon shag the kermit. The rhianon is lipless. The rhianon is pathologic. The rhianon condemn the kermit. The rhianon divagate the kermit. The kermit shag the rhianon. The kermit is lipless. The kermit is pathologic. The kermit is gauntleted. The kermit is golden. The kermit condemn the rhianon. The kermit divagate the rhianon. If something condemn the kermit and it divagate the rhianon then the rhianon shag the kermit. If something is lipless then it is unbeloved. If something shag the rhianon and it condemn the rhianon then the rhianon condemn the kermit. If something is unbeloved and gauntleted then it divagate the kermit. If something divagate the rhianon then the rhianon shag the kermit. If something divagate the kermit then it shag the kermit. The rhianon does not chase the rhianon.", "logic": "\nShag(rhianon, kermit)\nLipless(rhianon)\nPathologic(rhianon)\nCondemn(rhianon, kermit)\nDivagate(rhianon, kermit)\nShag(kermit, rhianon)\nLipless(kermit)\nPathologic(kermit)\nGauntleted(kermit)\nGolden(kermit)\nCondemn(kermit, rhianon)\nDivagate(kermit, rhianon)\nforall x (Condemn(x, kermit) and Divagate(x, rhianon) -> Shag(rhianon, kermit))\nforall x (Lipless(x) -> Unbeloved(x))\nforall x (Shag(x, rhianon) and Condemn(x, rhianon) -> Condemn(rhianon, kermit))\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) and Gauntleted(x) -> Divagate(x, kermit))\nforall x (Divagate(x, rhianon) -> Shag(rhianon, kermit))\nforall x (Divagate(x, kermit) -> Shag(x, kermit))\n\nnot Shag(rhianon, rhianon)\n\nnot Shag(rhianon, rhianon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The baily incurvate the kendra. The baily is leisurely. The baily is technical. The baily steep the kendra. The baily clown the kendra. The kendra incurvate the baily. The kendra is leisurely. The kendra is technical. The kendra is fruiting. The kendra is countless. The kendra steep the baily. The kendra clown the baily. If something steep the kendra and it clown the baily then the baily incurvate the kendra. If something is leisurely then it is vivid. If something incurvate the baily and it steep the baily then the baily steep the kendra. If something is vivid and fruiting then it clown the kendra. If something clown the baily then the baily incurvate the kendra. If something clown the kendra then it incurvate the kendra. The baily is fruiting.", "logic": "\nIncurvate(baily, kendra)\nLeisurely(baily)\nTechnical(baily)\nSteep(baily, kendra)\nClown(baily, kendra)\nIncurvate(kendra, baily)\nLeisurely(kendra)\nTechnical(kendra)\nFruiting(kendra)\nCountless(kendra)\nSteep(kendra, baily)\nClown(kendra, baily)\nforall x (Steep(x, kendra) and Clown(x, baily) -> Incurvate(baily, kendra))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, baily) and Steep(x, baily) -> Steep(baily, kendra))\nforall x (Vivid(x) and Fruiting(x) -> Clown(x, kendra))\nforall x (Clown(x, baily) -> Incurvate(baily, kendra))\nforall x (Clown(x, kendra) -> Incurvate(x, kendra))\n\nFruiting(baily)\n\nFruiting(baily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The fawnia construct the nariko. The fawnia is plush. The fawnia is meningeal. The fawnia conclude the nariko. The fawnia banquet the nariko. The nariko construct the fawnia. The nariko is plush. The nariko is meningeal. The nariko is happy. The nariko is wholesale. The nariko conclude the fawnia. The nariko banquet the fawnia. If something conclude the nariko and it banquet the fawnia then the fawnia construct the nariko. If something is plush then it is jealous. If something construct the fawnia and it conclude the fawnia then the fawnia conclude the nariko. If something is jealous and happy then it banquet the nariko. If something banquet the fawnia then the fawnia construct the nariko. If something banquet the nariko then it construct the nariko. The nariko does not like the nariko.", "logic": "\nConstruct(fawnia, nariko)\nPlush(fawnia)\nMeningeal(fawnia)\nConclude(fawnia, nariko)\nBanquet(fawnia, nariko)\nConstruct(nariko, fawnia)\nPlush(nariko)\nMeningeal(nariko)\nHappy(nariko)\nWholesale(nariko)\nConclude(nariko, fawnia)\nBanquet(nariko, fawnia)\nforall x (Conclude(x, nariko) and Banquet(x, fawnia) -> Construct(fawnia, nariko))\nforall x (Plush(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Construct(x, fawnia) and Conclude(x, fawnia) -> Conclude(fawnia, nariko))\nforall x (Jealous(x) and Happy(x) -> Banquet(x, nariko))\nforall x (Banquet(x, fawnia) -> Construct(fawnia, nariko))\nforall x (Banquet(x, nariko) -> Construct(x, nariko))\n\nnot Conclude(nariko, nariko)\n\nnot Conclude(nariko, nariko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "The tudor intumesce the devora. The tudor is zoonotic. The tudor is unnerved. The tudor prelude the devora. The tudor ritualise the devora. The devora intumesce the tudor. The devora is zoonotic. The devora is unnerved. The devora is weakened. The devora is cockamamie. The devora prelude the tudor. The devora ritualise the tudor. If something prelude the devora and it ritualise the tudor then the tudor intumesce the devora. If something is zoonotic then it is millennian. If something intumesce the tudor and it prelude the tudor then the tudor prelude the devora. If something is millennian and weakened then it ritualise the devora. If something ritualise the tudor then the tudor intumesce the devora. If something ritualise the devora then it intumesce the devora. The tudor is cockamamie.", "logic": "\nIntumesce(tudor, devora)\nZoonotic(tudor)\nUnnerved(tudor)\nPrelude(tudor, devora)\nRitualise(tudor, devora)\nIntumesce(devora, tudor)\nZoonotic(devora)\nUnnerved(devora)\nWeakened(devora)\nCockamamie(devora)\nPrelude(devora, tudor)\nRitualise(devora, tudor)\nforall x (Prelude(x, devora) and Ritualise(x, tudor) -> Intumesce(tudor, devora))\nforall x (Zoonotic(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, tudor) and Prelude(x, tudor) -> Prelude(tudor, devora))\nforall x (Millennian(x) and Weakened(x) -> Ritualise(x, devora))\nforall x (Ritualise(x, tudor) -> Intumesce(tudor, devora))\nforall x (Ritualise(x, devora) -> Intumesce(x, devora))\n\nCockamamie(tudor)\n\nCockamamie(tudor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1055"} {"premises": "Reggi is warring. Buddy is warring. Gwendolen is not crumpled. If someone is dowered then they are crumpled. If someone is pharaonic and not warring then they are not quirky. Rough, unalert people are not quirky. All dowered, crumpled people are pharaonic. If someone is unalert then they are not pharaonic. If someone is warring then they are dowered. Buddy is warring.", "logic": "\nWarring(reggi)\nWarring(buddy)\nnot Crumpled(gwendolen)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Crumpled(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and not Warring(x) -> not Quirky(x))\nforall x (Bowery(x) and Unalert(x) -> not Quirky(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) and Crumpled(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) -> not Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Warring(x) -> Dowered(x))\n\nWarring(buddy)\n\ntherefore Warring(buddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Robinson is xviii. Tremain is xviii. Rayner is not addled. If someone is unsalted then they are addled. If someone is manifold and not xviii then they are not squalid. Rough, larghetto people are not squalid. All unsalted, addled people are manifold. If someone is larghetto then they are not manifold. If someone is xviii then they are unsalted. Rayner is addled.", "logic": "\nXviii(robinson)\nXviii(tremain)\nnot Addled(rayner)\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> Addled(x))\nforall x (Manifold(x) and not Xviii(x) -> not Squalid(x))\nforall x (Floury(x) and Larghetto(x) -> not Squalid(x))\nforall x (Unsalted(x) and Addled(x) -> Manifold(x))\nforall x (Larghetto(x) -> not Manifold(x))\nforall x (Xviii(x) -> Unsalted(x))\n\nAddled(rayner)\n\ntherefore not Addled(rayner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Fabian is costly. Clarisse is costly. Jennifer is not answering. If someone is flocculent then they are answering. If someone is wilted and not costly then they are not metric. Rough, cxlv people are not metric. All flocculent, answering people are wilted. If someone is cxlv then they are not wilted. If someone is costly then they are flocculent. Clarisse is flocculent.", "logic": "\nCostly(fabian)\nCostly(clarisse)\nnot Answering(jennifer)\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Wilted(x) and not Costly(x) -> not Metric(x))\nforall x (Severed(x) and Cxlv(x) -> not Metric(x))\nforall x (Flocculent(x) and Answering(x) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Cxlv(x) -> not Wilted(x))\nforall x (Costly(x) -> Flocculent(x))\n\nFlocculent(clarisse)\n\nCostly(clarisse) and forall x (Costly(x) -> Flocculent(x)) -> therefore Flocculent(clarisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Yank is reckless. Rustin is reckless. Josselyn is not belittling. If someone is jittering then they are belittling. If someone is subsidized and not reckless then they are not alveolar. Rough, anaplastic people are not alveolar. All jittering, belittling people are subsidized. If someone is anaplastic then they are not subsidized. If someone is reckless then they are jittering. Rustin is not jittering.", "logic": "\nReckless(yank)\nReckless(rustin)\nnot Belittling(josselyn)\nforall x (Jittering(x) -> Belittling(x))\nforall x (Subsidized(x) and not Reckless(x) -> not Alveolar(x))\nforall x (Effective(x) and Anaplastic(x) -> not Alveolar(x))\nforall x (Jittering(x) and Belittling(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Anaplastic(x) -> not Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) -> Jittering(x))\n\nnot Jittering(rustin)\n\nReckless(rustin) and forall x (Reckless(x) -> Jittering(x)) -> therefore Jittering(rustin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Wilt is bared. Annabela is bared. Laure is not sumptuary. If someone is greensick then they are sumptuary. If someone is confusing and not bared then they are not mortified. Rough, pyrogenic people are not mortified. All greensick, sumptuary people are confusing. If someone is pyrogenic then they are not confusing. If someone is bared then they are greensick. Annabela is sumptuary.", "logic": "\nBared(wilt)\nBared(annabela)\nnot Sumptuary(laure)\nforall x (Greensick(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Confusing(x) and not Bared(x) -> not Mortified(x))\nforall x (Forgiving(x) and Pyrogenic(x) -> not Mortified(x))\nforall x (Greensick(x) and Sumptuary(x) -> Confusing(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) -> not Confusing(x))\nforall x (Bared(x) -> Greensick(x))\n\nSumptuary(annabela)\n\nBared(annabela) and forall x (Bared(x) -> Greensick(x)) -> therefore Greensick(annabela) Greensick(annabela) and forall x (Greensick(x) -> Sumptuary(x)) -> therefore Sumptuary(annabela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Morris is drear. Idalia is drear. Nike is not muscular. If someone is plumose then they are muscular. If someone is pictured and not drear then they are not absurd. Rough, lingual people are not absurd. All plumose, muscular people are pictured. If someone is lingual then they are not pictured. If someone is drear then they are plumose. Morris is not muscular.", "logic": "\nDrear(morris)\nDrear(idalia)\nnot Muscular(nike)\nforall x (Plumose(x) -> Muscular(x))\nforall x (Pictured(x) and not Drear(x) -> not Absurd(x))\nforall x (Skinned(x) and Lingual(x) -> not Absurd(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and Muscular(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Lingual(x) -> not Pictured(x))\nforall x (Drear(x) -> Plumose(x))\n\nnot Muscular(morris)\n\nDrear(morris) and forall x (Drear(x) -> Plumose(x)) -> therefore Plumose(morris) Plumose(morris) and forall x (Plumose(x) -> Muscular(x)) -> therefore Muscular(morris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Laina is untufted. Janka is untufted. Jules is not regular. If someone is disastrous then they are regular. If someone is montane and not untufted then they are not jerkwater. Rough, ferric people are not jerkwater. All disastrous, regular people are montane. If someone is ferric then they are not montane. If someone is untufted then they are disastrous. Janka is montane.", "logic": "\nUntufted(laina)\nUntufted(janka)\nnot Regular(jules)\nforall x (Disastrous(x) -> Regular(x))\nforall x (Montane(x) and not Untufted(x) -> not Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) and Ferric(x) -> not Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Disastrous(x) and Regular(x) -> Montane(x))\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> not Montane(x))\nforall x (Untufted(x) -> Disastrous(x))\n\nMontane(janka)\n\nUntufted(janka) and forall x (Untufted(x) -> Disastrous(x)) -> therefore Disastrous(janka) Untufted(janka) and forall x (Untufted(x) -> Disastrous(x)) -> therefore Disastrous(janka) Disastrous(janka) and forall x (Disastrous(x) -> Regular(x)) -> therefore Regular(janka) Disastrous(janka) and Regular(janka) and forall x (Disastrous(x) and Regular(x) -> Montane(x)) -> therefore Montane(janka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Ford is absorbing. Emmit is absorbing. Zary is not apterous. If someone is apathetic then they are apterous. If someone is plane and not absorbing then they are not contingent. Rough, specious people are not contingent. All apathetic, apterous people are plane. If someone is specious then they are not plane. If someone is absorbing then they are apathetic. Emmit is not plane.", "logic": "\nAbsorbing(ford)\nAbsorbing(emmit)\nnot Apterous(zary)\nforall x (Apathetic(x) -> Apterous(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) and not Absorbing(x) -> not Contingent(x))\nforall x (Unchewable(x) and Specious(x) -> not Contingent(x))\nforall x (Apathetic(x) and Apterous(x) -> Plane(x))\nforall x (Specious(x) -> not Plane(x))\nforall x (Absorbing(x) -> Apathetic(x))\n\nnot Plane(emmit)\n\nAbsorbing(emmit) and forall x (Absorbing(x) -> Apathetic(x)) -> therefore Apathetic(emmit) Absorbing(emmit) and forall x (Absorbing(x) -> Apathetic(x)) -> therefore Apathetic(emmit) Apathetic(emmit) and forall x (Apathetic(x) -> Apterous(x)) -> therefore Apterous(emmit) Apathetic(emmit) and Apterous(emmit) and forall x (Apathetic(x) and Apterous(x) -> Plane(x)) -> therefore Plane(emmit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Horace is peaked. Yuri is peaked. Fonz is not urinary. If someone is sheltered then they are urinary. If someone is corrupted and not peaked then they are not anabiotic. Rough, fitter people are not anabiotic. All sheltered, urinary people are corrupted. If someone is fitter then they are not corrupted. If someone is peaked then they are sheltered. Fonz is not corrupted.", "logic": "\nPeaked(horace)\nPeaked(yuri)\nnot Urinary(fonz)\nforall x (Sheltered(x) -> Urinary(x))\nforall x (Corrupted(x) and not Peaked(x) -> not Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) and Fitter(x) -> not Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Sheltered(x) and Urinary(x) -> Corrupted(x))\nforall x (Fitter(x) -> not Corrupted(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) -> Sheltered(x))\n\nnot Corrupted(fonz)\n\nforall x (Sheltered(x) and Urinary(x) -> Corrupted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Charmion is malted. Odelinda is malted. Torey is not tongueless. If someone is precooled then they are tongueless. If someone is agape and not malted then they are not rending. Rough, christian people are not rending. All precooled, tongueless people are agape. If someone is christian then they are not agape. If someone is malted then they are precooled. Torey is precooled.", "logic": "\nMalted(charmion)\nMalted(odelinda)\nnot Tongueless(torey)\nforall x (Precooled(x) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) and not Malted(x) -> not Rending(x))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) and Christian(x) -> not Rending(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) and Tongueless(x) -> Agape(x))\nforall x (Christian(x) -> not Agape(x))\nforall x (Malted(x) -> Precooled(x))\n\nPrecooled(torey)\n\nforall x (Malted(x) -> Precooled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Stanislaw is eager. Verene is eager. Jeanna is not inverted. If someone is digestible then they are inverted. If someone is platelike and not eager then they are not dedicated. Rough, bankable people are not dedicated. All digestible, inverted people are platelike. If someone is bankable then they are not platelike. If someone is eager then they are digestible. Jeanna is not eager.", "logic": "\nEager(stanislaw)\nEager(verene)\nnot Inverted(jeanna)\nforall x (Digestible(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Platelike(x) and not Eager(x) -> not Dedicated(x))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) and Bankable(x) -> not Dedicated(x))\nforall x (Digestible(x) and Inverted(x) -> Platelike(x))\nforall x (Bankable(x) -> not Platelike(x))\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Digestible(x))\n\nnot Eager(jeanna)\n\nnot Eager(jeanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Nola is papillate. Theodore is papillate. Brear is not xxxiii. If someone is sanious then they are xxxiii. If someone is lyonnaise and not papillate then they are not antonymous. Rough, stroppy people are not antonymous. All sanious, xxxiii people are lyonnaise. If someone is stroppy then they are not lyonnaise. If someone is papillate then they are sanious. Nola is abdicable.", "logic": "\nPapillate(nola)\nPapillate(theodore)\nnot Xxxiii(brear)\nforall x (Sanious(x) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) and not Papillate(x) -> not Antonymous(x))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) and Stroppy(x) -> not Antonymous(x))\nforall x (Sanious(x) and Xxxiii(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Stroppy(x) -> not Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Papillate(x) -> Sanious(x))\n\nAbdicable(nola)\n\nAbdicable(nola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Prince is capetian. Daryn is capetian. Chaddy is not calceiform. If someone is chestnut then they are calceiform. If someone is tatty and not capetian then they are not undomestic. Rough, pitiless people are not undomestic. All chestnut, calceiform people are tatty. If someone is pitiless then they are not tatty. If someone is capetian then they are chestnut. Daryn is not regulatory.", "logic": "\nCapetian(prince)\nCapetian(daryn)\nnot Calceiform(chaddy)\nforall x (Chestnut(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) and not Capetian(x) -> not Undomestic(x))\nforall x (Regulatory(x) and Pitiless(x) -> not Undomestic(x))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) and Calceiform(x) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Pitiless(x) -> not Tatty(x))\nforall x (Capetian(x) -> Chestnut(x))\n\nnot Regulatory(daryn)\n\nnot Regulatory(daryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Charleen is custom. Klarrisa is custom. Vassili is not starboard. If someone is theistical then they are starboard. If someone is natural and not custom then they are not analytic. Rough, namibian people are not analytic. All theistical, starboard people are natural. If someone is namibian then they are not natural. If someone is custom then they are theistical. Vassili is namibian.", "logic": "\nCustom(charleen)\nCustom(klarrisa)\nnot Starboard(vassili)\nforall x (Theistical(x) -> Starboard(x))\nforall x (Natural(x) and not Custom(x) -> not Analytic(x))\nforall x (Uncaulked(x) and Namibian(x) -> not Analytic(x))\nforall x (Theistical(x) and Starboard(x) -> Natural(x))\nforall x (Namibian(x) -> not Natural(x))\nforall x (Custom(x) -> Theistical(x))\n\nNamibian(vassili)\n\nNamibian(vassili) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Fernando is mitigated. Myra is mitigated. Elihu is not inside. If someone is utilizable then they are inside. If someone is vernal and not mitigated then they are not vindictive. Rough, woebegone people are not vindictive. All utilizable, inside people are vernal. If someone is woebegone then they are not vernal. If someone is mitigated then they are utilizable. Fernando is not woebegone.", "logic": "\nMitigated(fernando)\nMitigated(myra)\nnot Inside(elihu)\nforall x (Utilizable(x) -> Inside(x))\nforall x (Vernal(x) and not Mitigated(x) -> not Vindictive(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Woebegone(x) -> not Vindictive(x))\nforall x (Utilizable(x) and Inside(x) -> Vernal(x))\nforall x (Woebegone(x) -> not Vernal(x))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) -> Utilizable(x))\n\nnot Woebegone(fernando)\n\nnot Woebegone(fernando) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Agna is fulgurous. Wrennie is fulgurous. Althea is not rash. If someone is abiding then they are rash. If someone is abomasal and not fulgurous then they are not optimum. Rough, peaty people are not optimum. All abiding, rash people are abomasal. If someone is peaty then they are not abomasal. If someone is fulgurous then they are abiding. Agna is optimum.", "logic": "\nFulgurous(agna)\nFulgurous(wrennie)\nnot Rash(althea)\nforall x (Abiding(x) -> Rash(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and not Fulgurous(x) -> not Optimum(x))\nforall x (Oral(x) and Peaty(x) -> not Optimum(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) and Rash(x) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) -> not Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Abiding(x))\n\nOptimum(agna)\n\nOptimum(agna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1481"} {"premises": "Randolf is infected. Francisca is infected. Francisca is nauruan. If someone is nauruan then they are excited. If someone is collect then they are excited. All excited people are collect. If Randolf is perfidious and Randolf is excited then Randolf is twinkly. If someone is twinkly then they are not tributary. All collect, nauruan people are not tributary. If someone is collect and infected then they are twinkly. If someone is tributary and not collect then they are twinkly. Randolf is infected.", "logic": "\nInfected(randolf)\nInfected(francisca)\nNauruan(francisca)\nforall x (Nauruan(x) -> Excited(x))\nforall x (Collect(x) -> Excited(x))\nforall x (Excited(x) -> Collect(x))\nPerfidious(randolf) and Excited(randolf) -> Twinkly(randolf)\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> not Tributary(x))\nforall x (Collect(x) and Nauruan(x) -> not Tributary(x))\nforall x (Collect(x) and Infected(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) and not Collect(x) -> Twinkly(x))\n\nInfected(randolf)\n\ntherefore Infected(randolf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Ketty is fatherlike. Dieter is fatherlike. Dieter is friable. If someone is friable then they are terrifying. If someone is cuneate then they are terrifying. All terrifying people are cuneate. If Ketty is lightless and Ketty is terrifying then Ketty is recurrent. If someone is recurrent then they are not scrotal. All cuneate, friable people are not scrotal. If someone is cuneate and fatherlike then they are recurrent. If someone is scrotal and not cuneate then they are recurrent. Ketty is not fatherlike.", "logic": "\nFatherlike(ketty)\nFatherlike(dieter)\nFriable(dieter)\nforall x (Friable(x) -> Terrifying(x))\nforall x (Cuneate(x) -> Terrifying(x))\nforall x (Terrifying(x) -> Cuneate(x))\nLightless(ketty) and Terrifying(ketty) -> Recurrent(ketty)\nforall x (Recurrent(x) -> not Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Cuneate(x) and Friable(x) -> not Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Cuneate(x) and Fatherlike(x) -> Recurrent(x))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) and not Cuneate(x) -> Recurrent(x))\n\nnot Fatherlike(ketty)\n\ntherefore Fatherlike(ketty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Lester is ramshackle. Fanni is ramshackle. Fanni is outlaw. If someone is outlaw then they are filiform. If someone is accessary then they are filiform. All filiform people are accessary. If Lester is fanatic and Lester is filiform then Lester is propellant. If someone is propellant then they are not egoistical. All accessary, outlaw people are not egoistical. If someone is accessary and ramshackle then they are propellant. If someone is egoistical and not accessary then they are propellant. Fanni is filiform.", "logic": "\nRamshackle(lester)\nRamshackle(fanni)\nOutlaw(fanni)\nforall x (Outlaw(x) -> Filiform(x))\nforall x (Accessary(x) -> Filiform(x))\nforall x (Filiform(x) -> Accessary(x))\nFanatic(lester) and Filiform(lester) -> Propellant(lester)\nforall x (Propellant(x) -> not Egoistical(x))\nforall x (Accessary(x) and Outlaw(x) -> not Egoistical(x))\nforall x (Accessary(x) and Ramshackle(x) -> Propellant(x))\nforall x (Egoistical(x) and not Accessary(x) -> Propellant(x))\n\nFiliform(fanni)\n\nOutlaw(fanni) and forall x (Outlaw(x) -> Filiform(x)) -> therefore Filiform(fanni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Shirleen is clipped. Eleanore is clipped. Eleanore is septrional. If someone is septrional then they are ignescent. If someone is bodily then they are ignescent. All ignescent people are bodily. If Shirleen is jumpy and Shirleen is ignescent then Shirleen is bedridden. If someone is bedridden then they are not aweigh. All bodily, septrional people are not aweigh. If someone is bodily and clipped then they are bedridden. If someone is aweigh and not bodily then they are bedridden. Eleanore is not ignescent.", "logic": "\nClipped(shirleen)\nClipped(eleanore)\nSeptrional(eleanore)\nforall x (Septrional(x) -> Ignescent(x))\nforall x (Bodily(x) -> Ignescent(x))\nforall x (Ignescent(x) -> Bodily(x))\nJumpy(shirleen) and Ignescent(shirleen) -> Bedridden(shirleen)\nforall x (Bedridden(x) -> not Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Bodily(x) and Septrional(x) -> not Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Bodily(x) and Clipped(x) -> Bedridden(x))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) and not Bodily(x) -> Bedridden(x))\n\nnot Ignescent(eleanore)\n\nSeptrional(eleanore) and forall x (Septrional(x) -> Ignescent(x)) -> therefore Ignescent(eleanore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Zsazsa is posh. Merrily is posh. Merrily is cantonal. If someone is cantonal then they are eatable. If someone is steadfast then they are eatable. All eatable people are steadfast. If Zsazsa is eighteenth and Zsazsa is eatable then Zsazsa is eulogistic. If someone is eulogistic then they are not semantic. All steadfast, cantonal people are not semantic. If someone is steadfast and posh then they are eulogistic. If someone is semantic and not steadfast then they are eulogistic. Merrily is steadfast.", "logic": "\nPosh(zsazsa)\nPosh(merrily)\nCantonal(merrily)\nforall x (Cantonal(x) -> Eatable(x))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) -> Eatable(x))\nforall x (Eatable(x) -> Steadfast(x))\nEighteenth(zsazsa) and Eatable(zsazsa) -> Eulogistic(zsazsa)\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) -> not Semantic(x))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) and Cantonal(x) -> not Semantic(x))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) and Posh(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\nforall x (Semantic(x) and not Steadfast(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\n\nSteadfast(merrily)\n\nCantonal(merrily) and forall x (Cantonal(x) -> Eatable(x)) -> therefore Eatable(merrily) Eatable(merrily) and forall x (Eatable(x) -> Steadfast(x)) -> therefore Steadfast(merrily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Morissa is incident. Meredeth is incident. Meredeth is travelled. If someone is travelled then they are didactical. If someone is protrusile then they are didactical. All didactical people are protrusile. If Morissa is ghanese and Morissa is didactical then Morissa is pondering. If someone is pondering then they are not squeaking. All protrusile, travelled people are not squeaking. If someone is protrusile and incident then they are pondering. If someone is squeaking and not protrusile then they are pondering. Meredeth is not protrusile.", "logic": "\nIncident(morissa)\nIncident(meredeth)\nTravelled(meredeth)\nforall x (Travelled(x) -> Didactical(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Didactical(x))\nforall x (Didactical(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nGhanese(morissa) and Didactical(morissa) -> Pondering(morissa)\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> not Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) and Travelled(x) -> not Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) and Incident(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Squeaking(x) and not Protrusile(x) -> Pondering(x))\n\nnot Protrusile(meredeth)\n\nTravelled(meredeth) and forall x (Travelled(x) -> Didactical(x)) -> therefore Didactical(meredeth) Didactical(meredeth) and forall x (Didactical(x) -> Protrusile(x)) -> therefore Protrusile(meredeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Raven is clean. Tamiko is clean. Tamiko is distal. If someone is distal then they are ingrained. If someone is misplaced then they are ingrained. All ingrained people are misplaced. If Raven is choosy and Raven is ingrained then Raven is wormlike. If someone is wormlike then they are not conceptive. All misplaced, distal people are not conceptive. If someone is misplaced and clean then they are wormlike. If someone is conceptive and not misplaced then they are wormlike. Tamiko is not conceptive.", "logic": "\nClean(raven)\nClean(tamiko)\nDistal(tamiko)\nforall x (Distal(x) -> Ingrained(x))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) -> Ingrained(x))\nforall x (Ingrained(x) -> Misplaced(x))\nChoosy(raven) and Ingrained(raven) -> Wormlike(raven)\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> not Conceptive(x))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) and Distal(x) -> not Conceptive(x))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) and Clean(x) -> Wormlike(x))\nforall x (Conceptive(x) and not Misplaced(x) -> Wormlike(x))\n\nnot Conceptive(tamiko)\n\nDistal(tamiko) and forall x (Distal(x) -> Ingrained(x)) -> therefore Ingrained(tamiko) Ingrained(tamiko) and forall x (Ingrained(x) -> Misplaced(x)) -> therefore Misplaced(tamiko) Misplaced(tamiko) and Distal(tamiko) and forall x (Misplaced(x) and Distal(x) -> not Conceptive(x)) -> therefore not Conceptive(tamiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Cheri is calico. Lauryn is calico. Lauryn is dissoluble. If someone is dissoluble then they are bristly. If someone is pitiful then they are bristly. All bristly people are pitiful. If Cheri is anadromous and Cheri is bristly then Cheri is biased. If someone is biased then they are not gardant. All pitiful, dissoluble people are not gardant. If someone is pitiful and calico then they are biased. If someone is gardant and not pitiful then they are biased. Lauryn is not biased.", "logic": "\nCalico(cheri)\nCalico(lauryn)\nDissoluble(lauryn)\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) -> Bristly(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> Bristly(x))\nforall x (Bristly(x) -> Pitiful(x))\nAnadromous(cheri) and Bristly(cheri) -> Biased(cheri)\nforall x (Biased(x) -> not Gardant(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) and Dissoluble(x) -> not Gardant(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) and Calico(x) -> Biased(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) and not Pitiful(x) -> Biased(x))\n\nnot Biased(lauryn)\n\nDissoluble(lauryn) and forall x (Dissoluble(x) -> Bristly(x)) -> therefore Bristly(lauryn) Bristly(lauryn) and forall x (Bristly(x) -> Pitiful(x)) -> therefore Pitiful(lauryn) Pitiful(lauryn) and Calico(lauryn) and forall x (Pitiful(x) and Calico(x) -> Biased(x)) -> therefore Biased(lauryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Shani is immaterial. Nicole is immaterial. Nicole is croupy. If someone is croupy then they are defined. If someone is recurved then they are defined. All defined people are recurved. If Shani is decreased and Shani is defined then Shani is gauzy. If someone is gauzy then they are not pressor. All recurved, croupy people are not pressor. If someone is recurved and immaterial then they are gauzy. If someone is pressor and not recurved then they are gauzy. Shani is not recurved.", "logic": "\nImmaterial(shani)\nImmaterial(nicole)\nCroupy(nicole)\nforall x (Croupy(x) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Defined(x) -> Recurved(x))\nDecreased(shani) and Defined(shani) -> Gauzy(shani)\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> not Pressor(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Croupy(x) -> not Pressor(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Immaterial(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Pressor(x) and not Recurved(x) -> Gauzy(x))\n\nnot Recurved(shani)\n\nforall x (Defined(x) -> Recurved(x)) <- forall x (Croupy(x) -> Defined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Sammy is milky. Thibaud is milky. Thibaud is monovular. If someone is monovular then they are tasteless. If someone is wooded then they are tasteless. All tasteless people are wooded. If Sammy is acold and Sammy is tasteless then Sammy is unsung. If someone is unsung then they are not fencelike. All wooded, monovular people are not fencelike. If someone is wooded and milky then they are unsung. If someone is fencelike and not wooded then they are unsung. Sammy is tasteless.", "logic": "\nMilky(sammy)\nMilky(thibaud)\nMonovular(thibaud)\nforall x (Monovular(x) -> Tasteless(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) -> Tasteless(x))\nforall x (Tasteless(x) -> Wooded(x))\nAcold(sammy) and Tasteless(sammy) -> Unsung(sammy)\nforall x (Unsung(x) -> not Fencelike(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) and Monovular(x) -> not Fencelike(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) and Milky(x) -> Unsung(x))\nforall x (Fencelike(x) and not Wooded(x) -> Unsung(x))\n\nTasteless(sammy)\n\nforall x (Wooded(x) -> Tasteless(x)) <- forall x (Tasteless(x) -> Wooded(x)) <- forall x (Monovular(x) -> Tasteless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Elias is imposed. Ranice is imposed. Ranice is factual. If someone is factual then they are legless. If someone is bacterial then they are legless. All legless people are bacterial. If Elias is virtuous and Elias is legless then Elias is timid. If someone is timid then they are not uppermost. All bacterial, factual people are not uppermost. If someone is bacterial and imposed then they are timid. If someone is uppermost and not bacterial then they are timid. Elias is not timid.", "logic": "\nImposed(elias)\nImposed(ranice)\nFactual(ranice)\nforall x (Factual(x) -> Legless(x))\nforall x (Bacterial(x) -> Legless(x))\nforall x (Legless(x) -> Bacterial(x))\nVirtuous(elias) and Legless(elias) -> Timid(elias)\nforall x (Timid(x) -> not Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Bacterial(x) and Factual(x) -> not Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Bacterial(x) and Imposed(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Uppermost(x) and not Bacterial(x) -> Timid(x))\n\nnot Timid(elias)\n\nforall x (Bacterial(x) and Imposed(x) -> Timid(x)) <- forall x (Legless(x) -> Bacterial(x)) <- forall x (Factual(x) -> Legless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Ettie is unmixed. Faunie is unmixed. Faunie is godlike. If someone is godlike then they are massive. If someone is liege then they are massive. All massive people are liege. If Ettie is blocked and Ettie is massive then Ettie is damned. If someone is damned then they are not pledged. All liege, godlike people are not pledged. If someone is liege and unmixed then they are damned. If someone is pledged and not liege then they are damned. Faunie is blocked.", "logic": "\nUnmixed(ettie)\nUnmixed(faunie)\nGodlike(faunie)\nforall x (Godlike(x) -> Massive(x))\nforall x (Liege(x) -> Massive(x))\nforall x (Massive(x) -> Liege(x))\nBlocked(ettie) and Massive(ettie) -> Damned(ettie)\nforall x (Damned(x) -> not Pledged(x))\nforall x (Liege(x) and Godlike(x) -> not Pledged(x))\nforall x (Liege(x) and Unmixed(x) -> Damned(x))\nforall x (Pledged(x) and not Liege(x) -> Damned(x))\n\nBlocked(faunie)\n\nBlocked(faunie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Conney is grisly. Kathye is grisly. Kathye is askance. If someone is askance then they are digestive. If someone is adamantine then they are digestive. All digestive people are adamantine. If Conney is untactful and Conney is digestive then Conney is fingerless. If someone is fingerless then they are not spacy. All adamantine, askance people are not spacy. If someone is adamantine and grisly then they are fingerless. If someone is spacy and not adamantine then they are fingerless. Conney is not spacy.", "logic": "\nGrisly(conney)\nGrisly(kathye)\nAskance(kathye)\nforall x (Askance(x) -> Digestive(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) -> Digestive(x))\nforall x (Digestive(x) -> Adamantine(x))\nUntactful(conney) and Digestive(conney) -> Fingerless(conney)\nforall x (Fingerless(x) -> not Spacy(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) and Askance(x) -> not Spacy(x))\nforall x (Adamantine(x) and Grisly(x) -> Fingerless(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) and not Adamantine(x) -> Fingerless(x))\n\nnot Spacy(conney)\n\nnot Spacy(conney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "Rhodie is sagacious. Berget is sagacious. Berget is unshelled. If someone is unshelled then they are pervasive. If someone is allelic then they are pervasive. All pervasive people are allelic. If Rhodie is northerly and Rhodie is pervasive then Rhodie is seventeen. If someone is seventeen then they are not apterous. All allelic, unshelled people are not apterous. If someone is allelic and sagacious then they are seventeen. If someone is apterous and not allelic then they are seventeen. Rhodie is unshelled.", "logic": "\nSagacious(rhodie)\nSagacious(berget)\nUnshelled(berget)\nforall x (Unshelled(x) -> Pervasive(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) -> Pervasive(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) -> Allelic(x))\nNortherly(rhodie) and Pervasive(rhodie) -> Seventeen(rhodie)\nforall x (Seventeen(x) -> not Apterous(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) and Unshelled(x) -> not Apterous(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) and Sagacious(x) -> Seventeen(x))\nforall x (Apterous(x) and not Allelic(x) -> Seventeen(x))\n\nUnshelled(rhodie)\n\nUnshelled(rhodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1315"} {"premises": "The jonas is not myalgic. If someone is myalgic then they are not chivalric. If the jonas is swell then the jonas is myalgic. All stylized people are artificial. If someone is chivalric and swell then they are not stylized. If someone is myalgic and artificial then they are stylized. If the jonas is chivalric then the jonas is stylized. If the jonas is stylized then the jonas is chivalric. If the jonas is not myalgic then the jonas is chivalric. The jonas is not myalgic.", "logic": "\nnot Myalgic(jonas)\nforall x (Myalgic(x) -> not Chivalric(x))\nSwell(jonas) -> Myalgic(jonas)\nforall x (Stylized(x) -> Artificial(x))\nforall x (Chivalric(x) and Swell(x) -> not Stylized(x))\nforall x (Myalgic(x) and Artificial(x) -> Stylized(x))\nChivalric(jonas) -> Stylized(jonas)\nStylized(jonas) -> Chivalric(jonas)\nnot Myalgic(jonas) -> Chivalric(jonas)\n\nnot Myalgic(jonas)\n\ntherefore not Myalgic(jonas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The annalisa is not ubiquitous. If someone is ubiquitous then they are not glowing. If the annalisa is plebeian then the annalisa is ubiquitous. All billed people are caruncular. If someone is glowing and plebeian then they are not billed. If someone is ubiquitous and caruncular then they are billed. If the annalisa is glowing then the annalisa is billed. If the annalisa is billed then the annalisa is glowing. If the annalisa is not ubiquitous then the annalisa is glowing. The annalisa is ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nnot Ubiquitous(annalisa)\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) -> not Glowing(x))\nPlebeian(annalisa) -> Ubiquitous(annalisa)\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Glowing(x) and Plebeian(x) -> not Billed(x))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) and Caruncular(x) -> Billed(x))\nGlowing(annalisa) -> Billed(annalisa)\nBilled(annalisa) -> Glowing(annalisa)\nnot Ubiquitous(annalisa) -> Glowing(annalisa)\n\nUbiquitous(annalisa)\n\ntherefore not Ubiquitous(annalisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The floyd is not flying. If someone is flying then they are not cystic. If the floyd is lubricated then the floyd is flying. All calcific people are reflexed. If someone is cystic and lubricated then they are not calcific. If someone is flying and reflexed then they are calcific. If the floyd is cystic then the floyd is calcific. If the floyd is calcific then the floyd is cystic. If the floyd is not flying then the floyd is cystic. The floyd is cystic.", "logic": "\nnot Flying(floyd)\nforall x (Flying(x) -> not Cystic(x))\nLubricated(floyd) -> Flying(floyd)\nforall x (Calcific(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nforall x (Cystic(x) and Lubricated(x) -> not Calcific(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) and Reflexed(x) -> Calcific(x))\nCystic(floyd) -> Calcific(floyd)\nCalcific(floyd) -> Cystic(floyd)\nnot Flying(floyd) -> Cystic(floyd)\n\nCystic(floyd)\n\nnot Flying(floyd) and not Flying(floyd) -> Cystic(floyd) -> therefore Cystic(floyd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The helsa is not blameable. If someone is blameable then they are not unseamed. If the helsa is unmusical then the helsa is blameable. All ligneous people are expansive. If someone is unseamed and unmusical then they are not ligneous. If someone is blameable and expansive then they are ligneous. If the helsa is unseamed then the helsa is ligneous. If the helsa is ligneous then the helsa is unseamed. If the helsa is not blameable then the helsa is unseamed. The helsa is not unseamed.", "logic": "\nnot Blameable(helsa)\nforall x (Blameable(x) -> not Unseamed(x))\nUnmusical(helsa) -> Blameable(helsa)\nforall x (Ligneous(x) -> Expansive(x))\nforall x (Unseamed(x) and Unmusical(x) -> not Ligneous(x))\nforall x (Blameable(x) and Expansive(x) -> Ligneous(x))\nUnseamed(helsa) -> Ligneous(helsa)\nLigneous(helsa) -> Unseamed(helsa)\nnot Blameable(helsa) -> Unseamed(helsa)\n\nnot Unseamed(helsa)\n\nnot Blameable(helsa) and not Blameable(helsa) -> Unseamed(helsa) -> therefore Unseamed(helsa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The thaxter is not breathed. If someone is breathed then they are not harmful. If the thaxter is unrealised then the thaxter is breathed. All suctorial people are contained. If someone is harmful and unrealised then they are not suctorial. If someone is breathed and contained then they are suctorial. If the thaxter is harmful then the thaxter is suctorial. If the thaxter is suctorial then the thaxter is harmful. If the thaxter is not breathed then the thaxter is harmful. The thaxter is suctorial.", "logic": "\nnot Breathed(thaxter)\nforall x (Breathed(x) -> not Harmful(x))\nUnrealised(thaxter) -> Breathed(thaxter)\nforall x (Suctorial(x) -> Contained(x))\nforall x (Harmful(x) and Unrealised(x) -> not Suctorial(x))\nforall x (Breathed(x) and Contained(x) -> Suctorial(x))\nHarmful(thaxter) -> Suctorial(thaxter)\nSuctorial(thaxter) -> Harmful(thaxter)\nnot Breathed(thaxter) -> Harmful(thaxter)\n\nSuctorial(thaxter)\n\nnot Breathed(thaxter) and not Breathed(thaxter) -> Harmful(thaxter) -> therefore Harmful(thaxter) Harmful(thaxter) and Harmful(thaxter) -> Suctorial(thaxter) -> therefore Suctorial(thaxter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The samuel is not softheaded. If someone is softheaded then they are not turbid. If the samuel is precedent then the samuel is softheaded. All snarly people are gravelly. If someone is turbid and precedent then they are not snarly. If someone is softheaded and gravelly then they are snarly. If the samuel is turbid then the samuel is snarly. If the samuel is snarly then the samuel is turbid. If the samuel is not softheaded then the samuel is turbid. The samuel is not snarly.", "logic": "\nnot Softheaded(samuel)\nforall x (Softheaded(x) -> not Turbid(x))\nPrecedent(samuel) -> Softheaded(samuel)\nforall x (Snarly(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) and Precedent(x) -> not Snarly(x))\nforall x (Softheaded(x) and Gravelly(x) -> Snarly(x))\nTurbid(samuel) -> Snarly(samuel)\nSnarly(samuel) -> Turbid(samuel)\nnot Softheaded(samuel) -> Turbid(samuel)\n\nnot Snarly(samuel)\n\nnot Softheaded(samuel) and not Softheaded(samuel) -> Turbid(samuel) -> therefore Turbid(samuel) Turbid(samuel) and Turbid(samuel) -> Snarly(samuel) -> therefore Snarly(samuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The miles is not canine. If someone is canine then they are not straying. If the miles is assentient then the miles is canine. All monoatomic people are tattling. If someone is straying and assentient then they are not monoatomic. If someone is canine and tattling then they are monoatomic. If the miles is straying then the miles is monoatomic. If the miles is monoatomic then the miles is straying. If the miles is not canine then the miles is straying. The miles is tattling.", "logic": "\nnot Canine(miles)\nforall x (Canine(x) -> not Straying(x))\nAssentient(miles) -> Canine(miles)\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Straying(x) and Assentient(x) -> not Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Canine(x) and Tattling(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nStraying(miles) -> Monoatomic(miles)\nMonoatomic(miles) -> Straying(miles)\nnot Canine(miles) -> Straying(miles)\n\nTattling(miles)\n\nnot Canine(miles) and not Canine(miles) -> Straying(miles) -> therefore Straying(miles) Straying(miles) and Straying(miles) -> Monoatomic(miles) -> therefore Monoatomic(miles) Monoatomic(miles) and forall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Tattling(x)) -> therefore Tattling(miles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The inci is not acritical. If someone is acritical then they are not cityfied. If the inci is modulated then the inci is acritical. All baccate people are crazy. If someone is cityfied and modulated then they are not baccate. If someone is acritical and crazy then they are baccate. If the inci is cityfied then the inci is baccate. If the inci is baccate then the inci is cityfied. If the inci is not acritical then the inci is cityfied. The inci is not crazy.", "logic": "\nnot Acritical(inci)\nforall x (Acritical(x) -> not Cityfied(x))\nModulated(inci) -> Acritical(inci)\nforall x (Baccate(x) -> Crazy(x))\nforall x (Cityfied(x) and Modulated(x) -> not Baccate(x))\nforall x (Acritical(x) and Crazy(x) -> Baccate(x))\nCityfied(inci) -> Baccate(inci)\nBaccate(inci) -> Cityfied(inci)\nnot Acritical(inci) -> Cityfied(inci)\n\nnot Crazy(inci)\n\nnot Acritical(inci) and not Acritical(inci) -> Cityfied(inci) -> therefore Cityfied(inci) Cityfied(inci) and Cityfied(inci) -> Baccate(inci) -> therefore Baccate(inci) Baccate(inci) and forall x (Baccate(x) -> Crazy(x)) -> therefore Crazy(inci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The marne is not shaded. If someone is shaded then they are not optic. If the marne is tempered then the marne is shaded. All trained people are complex. If someone is optic and tempered then they are not trained. If someone is shaded and complex then they are trained. If the marne is optic then the marne is trained. If the marne is trained then the marne is optic. If the marne is not shaded then the marne is optic. The marne does not like the marne.", "logic": "\nnot Shaded(marne)\nforall x (Shaded(x) -> not Optic(x))\nTempered(marne) -> Shaded(marne)\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Complex(x))\nforall x (Optic(x) and Tempered(x) -> not Trained(x))\nforall x (Shaded(x) and Complex(x) -> Trained(x))\nOptic(marne) -> Trained(marne)\nTrained(marne) -> Optic(marne)\nnot Shaded(marne) -> Optic(marne)\n\nnot Likes(marne, marne)\n\nnot Likes(marne, marne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The kostas is not burundian. If someone is burundian then they are not useful. If the kostas is parametric then the kostas is burundian. All busty people are skinless. If someone is useful and parametric then they are not busty. If someone is burundian and skinless then they are busty. If the kostas is useful then the kostas is busty. If the kostas is busty then the kostas is useful. If the kostas is not burundian then the kostas is useful. The kostas is parametric.", "logic": "\nnot Burundian(kostas)\nforall x (Burundian(x) -> not Useful(x))\nParametric(kostas) -> Burundian(kostas)\nforall x (Busty(x) -> Skinless(x))\nforall x (Useful(x) and Parametric(x) -> not Busty(x))\nforall x (Burundian(x) and Skinless(x) -> Busty(x))\nUseful(kostas) -> Busty(kostas)\nBusty(kostas) -> Useful(kostas)\nnot Burundian(kostas) -> Useful(kostas)\n\nParametric(kostas)\n\nParametric(kostas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The evette is not pugilistic. If someone is pugilistic then they are not hebraical. If the evette is virulent then the evette is pugilistic. All arabian people are prakritic. If someone is hebraical and virulent then they are not arabian. If someone is pugilistic and prakritic then they are arabian. If the evette is hebraical then the evette is arabian. If the evette is arabian then the evette is hebraical. If the evette is not pugilistic then the evette is hebraical. The evette does not need the evette.", "logic": "\nnot Pugilistic(evette)\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) -> not Hebraical(x))\nVirulent(evette) -> Pugilistic(evette)\nforall x (Arabian(x) -> Prakritic(x))\nforall x (Hebraical(x) and Virulent(x) -> not Arabian(x))\nforall x (Pugilistic(x) and Prakritic(x) -> Arabian(x))\nHebraical(evette) -> Arabian(evette)\nArabian(evette) -> Hebraical(evette)\nnot Pugilistic(evette) -> Hebraical(evette)\n\nnot Needs(evette, evette)\n\nnot Needs(evette, evette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The ronen is not oxidized. If someone is oxidized then they are not intended. If the ronen is pyramidic then the ronen is oxidized. All chiseled people are uric. If someone is intended and pyramidic then they are not chiseled. If someone is oxidized and uric then they are chiseled. If the ronen is intended then the ronen is chiseled. If the ronen is chiseled then the ronen is intended. If the ronen is not oxidized then the ronen is intended. The ronen eats the ronen.", "logic": "\nnot Oxidized(ronen)\nforall x (Oxidized(x) -> not Intended(x))\nPyramidic(ronen) -> Oxidized(ronen)\nforall x (Chiseled(x) -> Uric(x))\nforall x (Intended(x) and Pyramidic(x) -> not Chiseled(x))\nforall x (Oxidized(x) and Uric(x) -> Chiseled(x))\nIntended(ronen) -> Chiseled(ronen)\nChiseled(ronen) -> Intended(ronen)\nnot Oxidized(ronen) -> Intended(ronen)\n\nEats(ronen, ronen)\n\nEats(ronen, ronen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The katusha plop the calvin. The katusha serialize the calvin. The auria is eutrophic. The auria class the katusha. The auria plop the calvin. The auria serialize the calvin. The calvin is semiliquid. The calvin class the auria. The calvin plop the katusha. The calvin serialize the katusha. If the katusha is semiliquid and the katusha plop the calvin then the calvin plop the auria. If the auria serialize the calvin and the auria class the calvin then the auria is lowest. If the katusha class the auria then the auria serialize the calvin. If someone class the calvin then they see the auria. If someone plop the katusha and they visit the auria then the katusha plop the auria. If someone class the auria and the auria plop the calvin then the auria is semiliquid. If someone is lowest and they visit the katusha then the katusha is semiliquid. All semiliquid people are lowest. The auria is eutrophic.", "logic": "\nPlop(katusha, calvin)\nSerialize(katusha, calvin)\nEutrophic(auria)\nClass(auria, katusha)\nPlop(auria, calvin)\nSerialize(auria, calvin)\nSemiliquid(calvin)\nClass(calvin, auria)\nPlop(calvin, katusha)\nSerialize(calvin, katusha)\nSemiliquid(katusha) and Plop(katusha, calvin) -> Plop(calvin, auria)\nSerialize(auria, calvin) and Class(auria, calvin) -> Lowest(auria)\nClass(katusha, auria) -> Serialize(auria, calvin)\nforall x (Class(x, calvin) -> Plop(x, auria))\nforall x (Plop(x, katusha) and Serialize(x, auria) -> Plop(katusha, auria))\nforall x (Class(x, auria) and Plop(auria, calvin) -> Semiliquid(auria))\nforall x (Lowest(x) and Serialize(x, katusha) -> Semiliquid(katusha))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Lowest(x))\n\nEutrophic(auria)\n\ntherefore Eutrophic(auria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The hannibal ozonise the tiebout. The hannibal mumble the tiebout. The thebault is appetising. The thebault reactivate the hannibal. The thebault ozonise the tiebout. The thebault mumble the tiebout. The tiebout is loaded. The tiebout reactivate the thebault. The tiebout ozonise the hannibal. The tiebout mumble the hannibal. If the hannibal is loaded and the hannibal ozonise the tiebout then the tiebout ozonise the thebault. If the thebault mumble the tiebout and the thebault reactivate the tiebout then the thebault is disyllabic. If the hannibal reactivate the thebault then the thebault mumble the tiebout. If someone reactivate the tiebout then they see the thebault. If someone ozonise the hannibal and they visit the thebault then the hannibal ozonise the thebault. If someone reactivate the thebault and the thebault ozonise the tiebout then the thebault is loaded. If someone is disyllabic and they visit the hannibal then the hannibal is loaded. All loaded people are disyllabic. The tiebout does not visit the hannibal.", "logic": "\nOzonise(hannibal, tiebout)\nMumble(hannibal, tiebout)\nAppetising(thebault)\nReactivate(thebault, hannibal)\nOzonise(thebault, tiebout)\nMumble(thebault, tiebout)\nLoaded(tiebout)\nReactivate(tiebout, thebault)\nOzonise(tiebout, hannibal)\nMumble(tiebout, hannibal)\nLoaded(hannibal) and Ozonise(hannibal, tiebout) -> Ozonise(tiebout, thebault)\nMumble(thebault, tiebout) and Reactivate(thebault, tiebout) -> Disyllabic(thebault)\nReactivate(hannibal, thebault) -> Mumble(thebault, tiebout)\nforall x (Reactivate(x, tiebout) -> Ozonise(x, thebault))\nforall x (Ozonise(x, hannibal) and Mumble(x, thebault) -> Ozonise(hannibal, thebault))\nforall x (Reactivate(x, thebault) and Ozonise(thebault, tiebout) -> Loaded(thebault))\nforall x (Disyllabic(x) and Mumble(x, hannibal) -> Loaded(hannibal))\nforall x (Loaded(x) -> Disyllabic(x))\n\nnot Mumble(tiebout, hannibal)\n\ntherefore Mumble(tiebout, hannibal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The husain prank the carole. The husain speed the carole. The pavia is topped. The pavia mineralize the husain. The pavia prank the carole. The pavia speed the carole. The carole is tenderized. The carole mineralize the pavia. The carole prank the husain. The carole speed the husain. If the husain is tenderized and the husain prank the carole then the carole prank the pavia. If the pavia speed the carole and the pavia mineralize the carole then the pavia is under. If the husain mineralize the pavia then the pavia speed the carole. If someone mineralize the carole then they see the pavia. If someone prank the husain and they visit the pavia then the husain prank the pavia. If someone mineralize the pavia and the pavia prank the carole then the pavia is tenderized. If someone is under and they visit the husain then the husain is tenderized. All tenderized people are under. The pavia is tenderized.", "logic": "\nPrank(husain, carole)\nSpeed(husain, carole)\nTopped(pavia)\nMineralize(pavia, husain)\nPrank(pavia, carole)\nSpeed(pavia, carole)\nTenderized(carole)\nMineralize(carole, pavia)\nPrank(carole, husain)\nSpeed(carole, husain)\nTenderized(husain) and Prank(husain, carole) -> Prank(carole, pavia)\nSpeed(pavia, carole) and Mineralize(pavia, carole) -> Under(pavia)\nMineralize(husain, pavia) -> Speed(pavia, carole)\nforall x (Mineralize(x, carole) -> Prank(x, pavia))\nforall x (Prank(x, husain) and Speed(x, pavia) -> Prank(husain, pavia))\nforall x (Mineralize(x, pavia) and Prank(pavia, carole) -> Tenderized(pavia))\nforall x (Under(x) and Speed(x, husain) -> Tenderized(husain))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Under(x))\n\nTenderized(pavia)\n\nMineralize(carole, pavia) and Prank(pavia, carole) and forall x (Mineralize(x, pavia) and Prank(pavia, carole) -> Tenderized(pavia)) -> therefore Tenderized(pavia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The leanor alkalinise the sheree. The leanor portion the sheree. The tedd is aramaic. The tedd liberalise the leanor. The tedd alkalinise the sheree. The tedd portion the sheree. The sheree is diffused. The sheree liberalise the tedd. The sheree alkalinise the leanor. The sheree portion the leanor. If the leanor is diffused and the leanor alkalinise the sheree then the sheree alkalinise the tedd. If the tedd portion the sheree and the tedd liberalise the sheree then the tedd is blasting. If the leanor liberalise the tedd then the tedd portion the sheree. If someone liberalise the sheree then they see the tedd. If someone alkalinise the leanor and they visit the tedd then the leanor alkalinise the tedd. If someone liberalise the tedd and the tedd alkalinise the sheree then the tedd is diffused. If someone is blasting and they visit the leanor then the leanor is diffused. All diffused people are blasting. The sheree is not blasting.", "logic": "\nAlkalinise(leanor, sheree)\nPortion(leanor, sheree)\nAramaic(tedd)\nLiberalise(tedd, leanor)\nAlkalinise(tedd, sheree)\nPortion(tedd, sheree)\nDiffused(sheree)\nLiberalise(sheree, tedd)\nAlkalinise(sheree, leanor)\nPortion(sheree, leanor)\nDiffused(leanor) and Alkalinise(leanor, sheree) -> Alkalinise(sheree, tedd)\nPortion(tedd, sheree) and Liberalise(tedd, sheree) -> Blasting(tedd)\nLiberalise(leanor, tedd) -> Portion(tedd, sheree)\nforall x (Liberalise(x, sheree) -> Alkalinise(x, tedd))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, leanor) and Portion(x, tedd) -> Alkalinise(leanor, tedd))\nforall x (Liberalise(x, tedd) and Alkalinise(tedd, sheree) -> Diffused(tedd))\nforall x (Blasting(x) and Portion(x, leanor) -> Diffused(leanor))\nforall x (Diffused(x) -> Blasting(x))\n\nnot Blasting(sheree)\n\nDiffused(sheree) and forall x (Diffused(x) -> Blasting(x)) -> therefore Blasting(sheree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The dante humidify the savina. The dante employ the savina. The debbi is siamese. The debbi feel the dante. The debbi humidify the savina. The debbi employ the savina. The savina is such. The savina feel the debbi. The savina humidify the dante. The savina employ the dante. If the dante is such and the dante humidify the savina then the savina humidify the debbi. If the debbi employ the savina and the debbi feel the savina then the debbi is insoluble. If the dante feel the debbi then the debbi employ the savina. If someone feel the savina then they see the debbi. If someone humidify the dante and they visit the debbi then the dante humidify the debbi. If someone feel the debbi and the debbi humidify the savina then the debbi is such. If someone is insoluble and they visit the dante then the dante is such. All such people are insoluble. The dante is such.", "logic": "\nHumidify(dante, savina)\nEmploy(dante, savina)\nSiamese(debbi)\nFeel(debbi, dante)\nHumidify(debbi, savina)\nEmploy(debbi, savina)\nSuch(savina)\nFeel(savina, debbi)\nHumidify(savina, dante)\nEmploy(savina, dante)\nSuch(dante) and Humidify(dante, savina) -> Humidify(savina, debbi)\nEmploy(debbi, savina) and Feel(debbi, savina) -> Insoluble(debbi)\nFeel(dante, debbi) -> Employ(debbi, savina)\nforall x (Feel(x, savina) -> Humidify(x, debbi))\nforall x (Humidify(x, dante) and Employ(x, debbi) -> Humidify(dante, debbi))\nforall x (Feel(x, debbi) and Humidify(debbi, savina) -> Such(debbi))\nforall x (Insoluble(x) and Employ(x, dante) -> Such(dante))\nforall x (Such(x) -> Insoluble(x))\n\nSuch(dante)\n\nSuch(savina) and forall x (Such(x) -> Insoluble(x)) -> therefore Insoluble(savina) Insoluble(savina) and Employ(savina, dante) and forall x (Insoluble(x) and Employ(x, dante) -> Such(dante)) -> therefore Such(dante)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The forster revamp the kent. The forster misfire the kent. The esmeralda is loaded. The esmeralda fine the forster. The esmeralda revamp the kent. The esmeralda misfire the kent. The kent is violative. The kent fine the esmeralda. The kent revamp the forster. The kent misfire the forster. If the forster is violative and the forster revamp the kent then the kent revamp the esmeralda. If the esmeralda misfire the kent and the esmeralda fine the kent then the esmeralda is sleeping. If the forster fine the esmeralda then the esmeralda misfire the kent. If someone fine the kent then they see the esmeralda. If someone revamp the forster and they visit the esmeralda then the forster revamp the esmeralda. If someone fine the esmeralda and the esmeralda revamp the kent then the esmeralda is violative. If someone is sleeping and they visit the forster then the forster is violative. All violative people are sleeping. The forster is not violative.", "logic": "\nRevamp(forster, kent)\nMisfire(forster, kent)\nLoaded(esmeralda)\nFine(esmeralda, forster)\nRevamp(esmeralda, kent)\nMisfire(esmeralda, kent)\nViolative(kent)\nFine(kent, esmeralda)\nRevamp(kent, forster)\nMisfire(kent, forster)\nViolative(forster) and Revamp(forster, kent) -> Revamp(kent, esmeralda)\nMisfire(esmeralda, kent) and Fine(esmeralda, kent) -> Sleeping(esmeralda)\nFine(forster, esmeralda) -> Misfire(esmeralda, kent)\nforall x (Fine(x, kent) -> Revamp(x, esmeralda))\nforall x (Revamp(x, forster) and Misfire(x, esmeralda) -> Revamp(forster, esmeralda))\nforall x (Fine(x, esmeralda) and Revamp(esmeralda, kent) -> Violative(esmeralda))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) and Misfire(x, forster) -> Violative(forster))\nforall x (Violative(x) -> Sleeping(x))\n\nnot Violative(forster)\n\nViolative(kent) and forall x (Violative(x) -> Sleeping(x)) -> therefore Sleeping(kent) Sleeping(kent) and Misfire(kent, forster) and forall x (Sleeping(x) and Misfire(x, forster) -> Violative(forster)) -> therefore Violative(forster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The carissa nosedive the rozele. The carissa mull the rozele. The julian is copular. The julian emcee the carissa. The julian nosedive the rozele. The julian mull the rozele. The rozele is sceptical. The rozele emcee the julian. The rozele nosedive the carissa. The rozele mull the carissa. If the carissa is sceptical and the carissa nosedive the rozele then the rozele nosedive the julian. If the julian mull the rozele and the julian emcee the rozele then the julian is sublimate. If the carissa emcee the julian then the julian mull the rozele. If someone emcee the rozele then they see the julian. If someone nosedive the carissa and they visit the julian then the carissa nosedive the julian. If someone emcee the julian and the julian nosedive the rozele then the julian is sceptical. If someone is sublimate and they visit the carissa then the carissa is sceptical. All sceptical people are sublimate. The carissa is sublimate.", "logic": "\nNosedive(carissa, rozele)\nMull(carissa, rozele)\nCopular(julian)\nEmcee(julian, carissa)\nNosedive(julian, rozele)\nMull(julian, rozele)\nSceptical(rozele)\nEmcee(rozele, julian)\nNosedive(rozele, carissa)\nMull(rozele, carissa)\nSceptical(carissa) and Nosedive(carissa, rozele) -> Nosedive(rozele, julian)\nMull(julian, rozele) and Emcee(julian, rozele) -> Sublimate(julian)\nEmcee(carissa, julian) -> Mull(julian, rozele)\nforall x (Emcee(x, rozele) -> Nosedive(x, julian))\nforall x (Nosedive(x, carissa) and Mull(x, julian) -> Nosedive(carissa, julian))\nforall x (Emcee(x, julian) and Nosedive(julian, rozele) -> Sceptical(julian))\nforall x (Sublimate(x) and Mull(x, carissa) -> Sceptical(carissa))\nforall x (Sceptical(x) -> Sublimate(x))\n\nSublimate(carissa)\n\nSceptical(rozele) and forall x (Sceptical(x) -> Sublimate(x)) -> therefore Sublimate(rozele) Sublimate(rozele) and Mull(rozele, carissa) and forall x (Sublimate(x) and Mull(x, carissa) -> Sceptical(carissa)) -> therefore Sceptical(carissa) Sceptical(carissa) and forall x (Sceptical(x) -> Sublimate(x)) -> therefore Sublimate(carissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The pauletta comment the olympia. The pauletta abandon the olympia. The galina is sacred. The galina gauge the pauletta. The galina comment the olympia. The galina abandon the olympia. The olympia is monochrome. The olympia gauge the galina. The olympia comment the pauletta. The olympia abandon the pauletta. If the pauletta is monochrome and the pauletta comment the olympia then the olympia comment the galina. If the galina abandon the olympia and the galina gauge the olympia then the galina is pyretic. If the pauletta gauge the galina then the galina abandon the olympia. If someone gauge the olympia then they see the galina. If someone comment the pauletta and they visit the galina then the pauletta comment the galina. If someone gauge the galina and the galina comment the olympia then the galina is monochrome. If someone is pyretic and they visit the pauletta then the pauletta is monochrome. All monochrome people are pyretic. The olympia does not see the galina.", "logic": "\nComment(pauletta, olympia)\nAbandon(pauletta, olympia)\nSacred(galina)\nGauge(galina, pauletta)\nComment(galina, olympia)\nAbandon(galina, olympia)\nMonochrome(olympia)\nGauge(olympia, galina)\nComment(olympia, pauletta)\nAbandon(olympia, pauletta)\nMonochrome(pauletta) and Comment(pauletta, olympia) -> Comment(olympia, galina)\nAbandon(galina, olympia) and Gauge(galina, olympia) -> Pyretic(galina)\nGauge(pauletta, galina) -> Abandon(galina, olympia)\nforall x (Gauge(x, olympia) -> Comment(x, galina))\nforall x (Comment(x, pauletta) and Abandon(x, galina) -> Comment(pauletta, galina))\nforall x (Gauge(x, galina) and Comment(galina, olympia) -> Monochrome(galina))\nforall x (Pyretic(x) and Abandon(x, pauletta) -> Monochrome(pauletta))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) -> Pyretic(x))\n\nnot Comment(olympia, galina)\n\nMonochrome(olympia) and forall x (Monochrome(x) -> Pyretic(x)) -> therefore Pyretic(olympia) Pyretic(olympia) and Abandon(olympia, pauletta) and forall x (Pyretic(x) and Abandon(x, pauletta) -> Monochrome(pauletta)) -> therefore Monochrome(pauletta) Monochrome(pauletta) and Comment(pauletta, olympia) and Monochrome(pauletta) and Comment(pauletta, olympia) -> Comment(olympia, galina) -> therefore Comment(olympia, galina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The ben arbitrate the neile. The ben wheedle the neile. The dom is pillaged. The dom costume the ben. The dom arbitrate the neile. The dom wheedle the neile. The neile is fistular. The neile costume the dom. The neile arbitrate the ben. The neile wheedle the ben. If the ben is fistular and the ben arbitrate the neile then the neile arbitrate the dom. If the dom wheedle the neile and the dom costume the neile then the dom is monatomic. If the ben costume the dom then the dom wheedle the neile. If someone costume the neile then they see the dom. If someone arbitrate the ben and they visit the dom then the ben arbitrate the dom. If someone costume the dom and the dom arbitrate the neile then the dom is fistular. If someone is monatomic and they visit the ben then the ben is fistular. All fistular people are monatomic. The ben does not see the dom.", "logic": "\nArbitrate(ben, neile)\nWheedle(ben, neile)\nPillaged(dom)\nCostume(dom, ben)\nArbitrate(dom, neile)\nWheedle(dom, neile)\nFistular(neile)\nCostume(neile, dom)\nArbitrate(neile, ben)\nWheedle(neile, ben)\nFistular(ben) and Arbitrate(ben, neile) -> Arbitrate(neile, dom)\nWheedle(dom, neile) and Costume(dom, neile) -> Monatomic(dom)\nCostume(ben, dom) -> Wheedle(dom, neile)\nforall x (Costume(x, neile) -> Arbitrate(x, dom))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, ben) and Wheedle(x, dom) -> Arbitrate(ben, dom))\nforall x (Costume(x, dom) and Arbitrate(dom, neile) -> Fistular(dom))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Wheedle(x, ben) -> Fistular(ben))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Monatomic(x))\n\nnot Arbitrate(ben, dom)\n\nforall x (Costume(x, neile) -> Arbitrate(x, dom)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The micaela destress the leanora. The micaela typewrite the leanora. The olva is pithy. The olva talc the micaela. The olva destress the leanora. The olva typewrite the leanora. The leanora is bigmouthed. The leanora talc the olva. The leanora destress the micaela. The leanora typewrite the micaela. If the micaela is bigmouthed and the micaela destress the leanora then the leanora destress the olva. If the olva typewrite the leanora and the olva talc the leanora then the olva is westward. If the micaela talc the olva then the olva typewrite the leanora. If someone talc the leanora then they see the olva. If someone destress the micaela and they visit the olva then the micaela destress the olva. If someone talc the olva and the olva destress the leanora then the olva is bigmouthed. If someone is westward and they visit the micaela then the micaela is bigmouthed. All bigmouthed people are westward. The olva destress the olva.", "logic": "\nDestress(micaela, leanora)\nTypewrite(micaela, leanora)\nPithy(olva)\nTalc(olva, micaela)\nDestress(olva, leanora)\nTypewrite(olva, leanora)\nBigmouthed(leanora)\nTalc(leanora, olva)\nDestress(leanora, micaela)\nTypewrite(leanora, micaela)\nBigmouthed(micaela) and Destress(micaela, leanora) -> Destress(leanora, olva)\nTypewrite(olva, leanora) and Talc(olva, leanora) -> Westward(olva)\nTalc(micaela, olva) -> Typewrite(olva, leanora)\nforall x (Talc(x, leanora) -> Destress(x, olva))\nforall x (Destress(x, micaela) and Typewrite(x, olva) -> Destress(micaela, olva))\nforall x (Talc(x, olva) and Destress(olva, leanora) -> Bigmouthed(olva))\nforall x (Westward(x) and Typewrite(x, micaela) -> Bigmouthed(micaela))\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Westward(x))\n\nDestress(olva, olva)\n\nforall x (Talc(x, leanora) -> Destress(x, olva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The genna hightail the shoshie. The genna mambo the shoshie. The broderic is bicornuate. The broderic contradict the genna. The broderic hightail the shoshie. The broderic mambo the shoshie. The shoshie is fourteenth. The shoshie contradict the broderic. The shoshie hightail the genna. The shoshie mambo the genna. If the genna is fourteenth and the genna hightail the shoshie then the shoshie hightail the broderic. If the broderic mambo the shoshie and the broderic contradict the shoshie then the broderic is roan. If the genna contradict the broderic then the broderic mambo the shoshie. If someone contradict the shoshie then they see the broderic. If someone hightail the genna and they visit the broderic then the genna hightail the broderic. If someone contradict the broderic and the broderic hightail the shoshie then the broderic is fourteenth. If someone is roan and they visit the genna then the genna is fourteenth. All fourteenth people are roan. The genna does not see the genna.", "logic": "\nHightail(genna, shoshie)\nMambo(genna, shoshie)\nBicornuate(broderic)\nContradict(broderic, genna)\nHightail(broderic, shoshie)\nMambo(broderic, shoshie)\nFourteenth(shoshie)\nContradict(shoshie, broderic)\nHightail(shoshie, genna)\nMambo(shoshie, genna)\nFourteenth(genna) and Hightail(genna, shoshie) -> Hightail(shoshie, broderic)\nMambo(broderic, shoshie) and Contradict(broderic, shoshie) -> Roan(broderic)\nContradict(genna, broderic) -> Mambo(broderic, shoshie)\nforall x (Contradict(x, shoshie) -> Hightail(x, broderic))\nforall x (Hightail(x, genna) and Mambo(x, broderic) -> Hightail(genna, broderic))\nforall x (Contradict(x, broderic) and Hightail(broderic, shoshie) -> Fourteenth(broderic))\nforall x (Roan(x) and Mambo(x, genna) -> Fourteenth(genna))\nforall x (Fourteenth(x) -> Roan(x))\n\nnot Hightail(genna, genna)\n\nnot Hightail(genna, genna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The goldie schuss the higgins. The goldie delocalize the higgins. The dyna is phosphoric. The dyna bare the goldie. The dyna schuss the higgins. The dyna delocalize the higgins. The higgins is otiose. The higgins bare the dyna. The higgins schuss the goldie. The higgins delocalize the goldie. If the goldie is otiose and the goldie schuss the higgins then the higgins schuss the dyna. If the dyna delocalize the higgins and the dyna bare the higgins then the dyna is cornered. If the goldie bare the dyna then the dyna delocalize the higgins. If someone bare the higgins then they see the dyna. If someone schuss the goldie and they visit the dyna then the goldie schuss the dyna. If someone bare the dyna and the dyna schuss the higgins then the dyna is otiose. If someone is cornered and they visit the goldie then the goldie is otiose. All otiose people are cornered. The higgins is phosphoric.", "logic": "\nSchuss(goldie, higgins)\nDelocalize(goldie, higgins)\nPhosphoric(dyna)\nBare(dyna, goldie)\nSchuss(dyna, higgins)\nDelocalize(dyna, higgins)\nOtiose(higgins)\nBare(higgins, dyna)\nSchuss(higgins, goldie)\nDelocalize(higgins, goldie)\nOtiose(goldie) and Schuss(goldie, higgins) -> Schuss(higgins, dyna)\nDelocalize(dyna, higgins) and Bare(dyna, higgins) -> Cornered(dyna)\nBare(goldie, dyna) -> Delocalize(dyna, higgins)\nforall x (Bare(x, higgins) -> Schuss(x, dyna))\nforall x (Schuss(x, goldie) and Delocalize(x, dyna) -> Schuss(goldie, dyna))\nforall x (Bare(x, dyna) and Schuss(dyna, higgins) -> Otiose(dyna))\nforall x (Cornered(x) and Delocalize(x, goldie) -> Otiose(goldie))\nforall x (Otiose(x) -> Cornered(x))\n\nPhosphoric(higgins)\n\nPhosphoric(higgins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The kurt winkle the lori. The kurt advect the lori. The crissie is dioecious. The crissie roughcast the kurt. The crissie winkle the lori. The crissie advect the lori. The lori is unclipped. The lori roughcast the crissie. The lori winkle the kurt. The lori advect the kurt. If the kurt is unclipped and the kurt winkle the lori then the lori winkle the crissie. If the crissie advect the lori and the crissie roughcast the lori then the crissie is heroic. If the kurt roughcast the crissie then the crissie advect the lori. If someone roughcast the lori then they see the crissie. If someone winkle the kurt and they visit the crissie then the kurt winkle the crissie. If someone roughcast the crissie and the crissie winkle the lori then the crissie is unclipped. If someone is heroic and they visit the kurt then the kurt is unclipped. All unclipped people are heroic. The lori does not need the kurt.", "logic": "\nWinkle(kurt, lori)\nAdvect(kurt, lori)\nDioecious(crissie)\nRoughcast(crissie, kurt)\nWinkle(crissie, lori)\nAdvect(crissie, lori)\nUnclipped(lori)\nRoughcast(lori, crissie)\nWinkle(lori, kurt)\nAdvect(lori, kurt)\nUnclipped(kurt) and Winkle(kurt, lori) -> Winkle(lori, crissie)\nAdvect(crissie, lori) and Roughcast(crissie, lori) -> Heroic(crissie)\nRoughcast(kurt, crissie) -> Advect(crissie, lori)\nforall x (Roughcast(x, lori) -> Winkle(x, crissie))\nforall x (Winkle(x, kurt) and Advect(x, crissie) -> Winkle(kurt, crissie))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, crissie) and Winkle(crissie, lori) -> Unclipped(crissie))\nforall x (Heroic(x) and Advect(x, kurt) -> Unclipped(kurt))\nforall x (Unclipped(x) -> Heroic(x))\n\nnot Roughcast(lori, kurt)\n\nnot Roughcast(lori, kurt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The stevena globalise the claude. The stevena foredoom the claude. The karita is mangy. The karita burnish the stevena. The karita globalise the claude. The karita foredoom the claude. The claude is unabashed. The claude burnish the karita. The claude globalise the stevena. The claude foredoom the stevena. If the stevena is unabashed and the stevena globalise the claude then the claude globalise the karita. If the karita foredoom the claude and the karita burnish the claude then the karita is stuffed. If the stevena burnish the karita then the karita foredoom the claude. If someone burnish the claude then they see the karita. If someone globalise the stevena and they visit the karita then the stevena globalise the karita. If someone burnish the karita and the karita globalise the claude then the karita is unabashed. If someone is stuffed and they visit the stevena then the stevena is unabashed. All unabashed people are stuffed. The claude is blue.", "logic": "\nGlobalise(stevena, claude)\nForedoom(stevena, claude)\nMangy(karita)\nBurnish(karita, stevena)\nGlobalise(karita, claude)\nForedoom(karita, claude)\nUnabashed(claude)\nBurnish(claude, karita)\nGlobalise(claude, stevena)\nForedoom(claude, stevena)\nUnabashed(stevena) and Globalise(stevena, claude) -> Globalise(claude, karita)\nForedoom(karita, claude) and Burnish(karita, claude) -> Stuffed(karita)\nBurnish(stevena, karita) -> Foredoom(karita, claude)\nforall x (Burnish(x, claude) -> Globalise(x, karita))\nforall x (Globalise(x, stevena) and Foredoom(x, karita) -> Globalise(stevena, karita))\nforall x (Burnish(x, karita) and Globalise(karita, claude) -> Unabashed(karita))\nforall x (Stuffed(x) and Foredoom(x, stevena) -> Unabashed(stevena))\nforall x (Unabashed(x) -> Stuffed(x))\n\nBlue(claude)\n\nBlue(claude) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The claudius tabulate the winne. The claudius phase the winne. The gabriele is manichee. The gabriele bamboozle the claudius. The gabriele tabulate the winne. The gabriele phase the winne. The winne is inky. The winne bamboozle the gabriele. The winne tabulate the claudius. The winne phase the claudius. If the claudius is inky and the claudius tabulate the winne then the winne tabulate the gabriele. If the gabriele phase the winne and the gabriele bamboozle the winne then the gabriele is scatty. If the claudius bamboozle the gabriele then the gabriele phase the winne. If someone bamboozle the winne then they see the gabriele. If someone tabulate the claudius and they visit the gabriele then the claudius tabulate the gabriele. If someone bamboozle the gabriele and the gabriele tabulate the winne then the gabriele is inky. If someone is scatty and they visit the claudius then the claudius is inky. All inky people are scatty. The claudius is not rough.", "logic": "\nTabulate(claudius, winne)\nPhase(claudius, winne)\nManichee(gabriele)\nBamboozle(gabriele, claudius)\nTabulate(gabriele, winne)\nPhase(gabriele, winne)\nInky(winne)\nBamboozle(winne, gabriele)\nTabulate(winne, claudius)\nPhase(winne, claudius)\nInky(claudius) and Tabulate(claudius, winne) -> Tabulate(winne, gabriele)\nPhase(gabriele, winne) and Bamboozle(gabriele, winne) -> Scatty(gabriele)\nBamboozle(claudius, gabriele) -> Phase(gabriele, winne)\nforall x (Bamboozle(x, winne) -> Tabulate(x, gabriele))\nforall x (Tabulate(x, claudius) and Phase(x, gabriele) -> Tabulate(claudius, gabriele))\nforall x (Bamboozle(x, gabriele) and Tabulate(gabriele, winne) -> Inky(gabriele))\nforall x (Scatty(x) and Phase(x, claudius) -> Inky(claudius))\nforall x (Inky(x) -> Scatty(x))\n\nnot Rough(claudius)\n\nnot Rough(claudius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "The gaven pettifog the shirline. The gaven rusticate the shirline. The vergil is ranking. The vergil article the gaven. The vergil pettifog the shirline. The vergil rusticate the shirline. The shirline is nonviable. The shirline article the vergil. The shirline pettifog the gaven. The shirline rusticate the gaven. If the gaven is nonviable and the gaven pettifog the shirline then the shirline pettifog the vergil. If the vergil rusticate the shirline and the vergil article the shirline then the vergil is narrowing. If the gaven article the vergil then the vergil rusticate the shirline. If someone article the shirline then they see the vergil. If someone pettifog the gaven and they visit the vergil then the gaven pettifog the vergil. If someone article the vergil and the vergil pettifog the shirline then the vergil is nonviable. If someone is narrowing and they visit the gaven then the gaven is nonviable. All nonviable people are narrowing. The gaven is ranking.", "logic": "\nPettifog(gaven, shirline)\nRusticate(gaven, shirline)\nRanking(vergil)\nArticle(vergil, gaven)\nPettifog(vergil, shirline)\nRusticate(vergil, shirline)\nNonviable(shirline)\nArticle(shirline, vergil)\nPettifog(shirline, gaven)\nRusticate(shirline, gaven)\nNonviable(gaven) and Pettifog(gaven, shirline) -> Pettifog(shirline, vergil)\nRusticate(vergil, shirline) and Article(vergil, shirline) -> Narrowing(vergil)\nArticle(gaven, vergil) -> Rusticate(vergil, shirline)\nforall x (Article(x, shirline) -> Pettifog(x, vergil))\nforall x (Pettifog(x, gaven) and Rusticate(x, vergil) -> Pettifog(gaven, vergil))\nforall x (Article(x, vergil) and Pettifog(vergil, shirline) -> Nonviable(vergil))\nforall x (Narrowing(x) and Rusticate(x, gaven) -> Nonviable(gaven))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) -> Narrowing(x))\n\nRanking(gaven)\n\nRanking(gaven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-739"} {"premises": "Lindsey is adventive. Harald is reclusive. Adina is ritardando. If Harald is snappy and Harald is adventive then Harald is ritardando. All snappy things are not ritardando. White things are snappy. If something is snappy then it is reclusive. Red things are coseismal. If something is faux and not coseismal then it is underclass. Lindsey is adventive.", "logic": "\nAdventive(lindsey)\nReclusive(harald)\nRitardando(adina)\nSnappy(harald) and Adventive(harald) -> Ritardando(harald)\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> not Ritardando(x))\nforall x (Adventive(x) -> Snappy(x))\nforall x (Snappy(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Coseismal(x))\nforall x (Faux(x) and not Coseismal(x) -> Underclass(x))\n\nAdventive(lindsey)\n\ntherefore Adventive(lindsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Kimberli is danish. Ingunna is gloomy. Milicent is osteal. If Ingunna is arawakan and Ingunna is danish then Ingunna is osteal. All arawakan things are not osteal. White things are arawakan. If something is arawakan then it is gloomy. Red things are passerine. If something is patronised and not passerine then it is asyndetic. Milicent is not osteal.", "logic": "\nDanish(kimberli)\nGloomy(ingunna)\nOsteal(milicent)\nArawakan(ingunna) and Danish(ingunna) -> Osteal(ingunna)\nforall x (Arawakan(x) -> not Osteal(x))\nforall x (Danish(x) -> Arawakan(x))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> Passerine(x))\nforall x (Patronised(x) and not Passerine(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\n\nnot Osteal(milicent)\n\ntherefore Osteal(milicent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Pammi is unsanitary. Fabio is recluse. Alysa is checkered. If Fabio is pyaemic and Fabio is unsanitary then Fabio is checkered. All pyaemic things are not checkered. White things are pyaemic. If something is pyaemic then it is recluse. Red things are thundering. If something is choppy and not thundering then it is collect. Fabio is thundering.", "logic": "\nUnsanitary(pammi)\nRecluse(fabio)\nCheckered(alysa)\nPyaemic(fabio) and Unsanitary(fabio) -> Checkered(fabio)\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> not Checkered(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Recluse(x))\nforall x (Recluse(x) -> Thundering(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) and not Thundering(x) -> Collect(x))\n\nThundering(fabio)\n\nRecluse(fabio) and forall x (Recluse(x) -> Thundering(x)) -> therefore Thundering(fabio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Clint is insular. Dimitri is inculpable. Easton is bicameral. If Dimitri is crazed and Dimitri is insular then Dimitri is bicameral. All crazed things are not bicameral. White things are crazed. If something is crazed then it is inculpable. Red things are assamese. If something is stunned and not assamese then it is deboned. Clint is not crazed.", "logic": "\nInsular(clint)\nInculpable(dimitri)\nBicameral(easton)\nCrazed(dimitri) and Insular(dimitri) -> Bicameral(dimitri)\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> not Bicameral(x))\nforall x (Insular(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> Assamese(x))\nforall x (Stunned(x) and not Assamese(x) -> Deboned(x))\n\nnot Crazed(clint)\n\nInsular(clint) and forall x (Insular(x) -> Crazed(x)) -> therefore Crazed(clint)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Maritsa is ephesian. Vonni is homologic. Ben is paranormal. If Vonni is deadpan and Vonni is ephesian then Vonni is paranormal. All deadpan things are not paranormal. White things are deadpan. If something is deadpan then it is homologic. Red things are vulturous. If something is equatorial and not vulturous then it is rhomboidal. Maritsa is homologic.", "logic": "\nEphesian(maritsa)\nHomologic(vonni)\nParanormal(ben)\nDeadpan(vonni) and Ephesian(vonni) -> Paranormal(vonni)\nforall x (Deadpan(x) -> not Paranormal(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) -> Deadpan(x))\nforall x (Deadpan(x) -> Homologic(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Vulturous(x))\nforall x (Equatorial(x) and not Vulturous(x) -> Rhomboidal(x))\n\nHomologic(maritsa)\n\nEphesian(maritsa) and forall x (Ephesian(x) -> Deadpan(x)) -> therefore Deadpan(maritsa) Deadpan(maritsa) and forall x (Deadpan(x) -> Homologic(x)) -> therefore Homologic(maritsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Valli is unaccepted. Phillie is cairned. Kaspar is gluttonous. If Phillie is limiting and Phillie is unaccepted then Phillie is gluttonous. All limiting things are not gluttonous. White things are limiting. If something is limiting then it is cairned. Red things are oecumenic. If something is visceral and not oecumenic then it is botanic. Valli is gluttonous.", "logic": "\nUnaccepted(valli)\nCairned(phillie)\nGluttonous(kaspar)\nLimiting(phillie) and Unaccepted(phillie) -> Gluttonous(phillie)\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> not Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Cairned(x))\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Visceral(x) and not Oecumenic(x) -> Botanic(x))\n\nGluttonous(valli)\n\nUnaccepted(valli) and forall x (Unaccepted(x) -> Limiting(x)) -> therefore Limiting(valli) Limiting(valli) and forall x (Limiting(x) -> not Gluttonous(x)) -> therefore not Gluttonous(valli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Elisha is silenced. Maurene is exogamous. Solly is idolised. If Maurene is tunisian and Maurene is silenced then Maurene is idolised. All tunisian things are not idolised. White things are tunisian. If something is tunisian then it is exogamous. Red things are annulated. If something is distracted and not annulated then it is cocky. Elisha is annulated.", "logic": "\nSilenced(elisha)\nExogamous(maurene)\nIdolised(solly)\nTunisian(maurene) and Silenced(maurene) -> Idolised(maurene)\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> not Idolised(x))\nforall x (Silenced(x) -> Tunisian(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) -> Annulated(x))\nforall x (Distracted(x) and not Annulated(x) -> Cocky(x))\n\nAnnulated(elisha)\n\nSilenced(elisha) and forall x (Silenced(x) -> Tunisian(x)) -> therefore Tunisian(elisha) Tunisian(elisha) and forall x (Tunisian(x) -> Exogamous(x)) -> therefore Exogamous(elisha) Exogamous(elisha) and forall x (Exogamous(x) -> Annulated(x)) -> therefore Annulated(elisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Alethea is unruly. Obadiah is millionth. Herbert is brasslike. If Obadiah is amoeban and Obadiah is unruly then Obadiah is brasslike. All amoeban things are not brasslike. White things are amoeban. If something is amoeban then it is millionth. Red things are ironshod. If something is enervated and not ironshod then it is barbed. Alethea is not ironshod.", "logic": "\nUnruly(alethea)\nMillionth(obadiah)\nBrasslike(herbert)\nAmoeban(obadiah) and Unruly(obadiah) -> Brasslike(obadiah)\nforall x (Amoeban(x) -> not Brasslike(x))\nforall x (Unruly(x) -> Amoeban(x))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) -> Millionth(x))\nforall x (Millionth(x) -> Ironshod(x))\nforall x (Enervated(x) and not Ironshod(x) -> Barbed(x))\n\nnot Ironshod(alethea)\n\nUnruly(alethea) and forall x (Unruly(x) -> Amoeban(x)) -> therefore Amoeban(alethea) Amoeban(alethea) and forall x (Amoeban(x) -> Millionth(x)) -> therefore Millionth(alethea) Millionth(alethea) and forall x (Millionth(x) -> Ironshod(x)) -> therefore Ironshod(alethea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Guy is chitinous. Lanita is abasic. Wade is demoniac. If Lanita is passing and Lanita is chitinous then Lanita is demoniac. All passing things are not demoniac. White things are passing. If something is passing then it is abasic. Red things are torturing. If something is defensible and not torturing then it is mandibular. Wade is not torturing.", "logic": "\nChitinous(guy)\nAbasic(lanita)\nDemoniac(wade)\nPassing(lanita) and Chitinous(lanita) -> Demoniac(lanita)\nforall x (Passing(x) -> not Demoniac(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> Passing(x))\nforall x (Passing(x) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) -> Torturing(x))\nforall x (Defensible(x) and not Torturing(x) -> Mandibular(x))\n\nnot Torturing(wade)\n\nforall x (Abasic(x) -> Torturing(x)) <- forall x (Passing(x) -> Abasic(x)) <- forall x (Chitinous(x) -> Passing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Dylan is clumsy. Brande is monthly. Wenona is unflawed. If Brande is doddery and Brande is clumsy then Brande is unflawed. All doddery things are not unflawed. White things are doddery. If something is doddery then it is monthly. Red things are tinpot. If something is rotund and not tinpot then it is unreliable. Brande is doddery.", "logic": "\nClumsy(dylan)\nMonthly(brande)\nUnflawed(wenona)\nDoddery(brande) and Clumsy(brande) -> Unflawed(brande)\nforall x (Doddery(x) -> not Unflawed(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) -> Doddery(x))\nforall x (Doddery(x) -> Monthly(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) -> Tinpot(x))\nforall x (Rotund(x) and not Tinpot(x) -> Unreliable(x))\n\nDoddery(brande)\n\nforall x (Clumsy(x) -> Doddery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Gabriella is unworthy. Garnet is scandalous. Elaine is disguised. If Garnet is lifelike and Garnet is unworthy then Garnet is disguised. All lifelike things are not disguised. White things are lifelike. If something is lifelike then it is scandalous. Red things are demeaning. If something is quantal and not demeaning then it is rightmost. Elaine is not scandalous.", "logic": "\nUnworthy(gabriella)\nScandalous(garnet)\nDisguised(elaine)\nLifelike(garnet) and Unworthy(garnet) -> Disguised(garnet)\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> not Disguised(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Lifelike(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Scandalous(x) -> Demeaning(x))\nforall x (Quantal(x) and not Demeaning(x) -> Rightmost(x))\n\nnot Scandalous(elaine)\n\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> Scandalous(x)) <- forall x (Unworthy(x) -> Lifelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Angelina is unicameral. Josephus is bitter. Shaughn is cotyloidal. If Josephus is katari and Josephus is unicameral then Josephus is cotyloidal. All katari things are not cotyloidal. White things are katari. If something is katari then it is bitter. Red things are watchful. If something is chanted and not watchful then it is syrian. Angelina is syrian.", "logic": "\nUnicameral(angelina)\nBitter(josephus)\nCotyloidal(shaughn)\nKatari(josephus) and Unicameral(josephus) -> Cotyloidal(josephus)\nforall x (Katari(x) -> not Cotyloidal(x))\nforall x (Unicameral(x) -> Katari(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) -> Bitter(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Watchful(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) and not Watchful(x) -> Syrian(x))\n\nSyrian(angelina)\n\nforall x (Chanted(x) and not Watchful(x) -> Syrian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Jemima is befogged. Sybil is canty. Quigman is unsnarled. If Sybil is metallic and Sybil is befogged then Sybil is unsnarled. All metallic things are not unsnarled. White things are metallic. If something is metallic then it is canty. Red things are exorbitant. If something is untired and not exorbitant then it is trochaic. Sybil is not befogged.", "logic": "\nBefogged(jemima)\nCanty(sybil)\nUnsnarled(quigman)\nMetallic(sybil) and Befogged(sybil) -> Unsnarled(sybil)\nforall x (Metallic(x) -> not Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Befogged(x) -> Metallic(x))\nforall x (Metallic(x) -> Canty(x))\nforall x (Canty(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Untired(x) and not Exorbitant(x) -> Trochaic(x))\n\nnot Befogged(sybil)\n\nnot Befogged(sybil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Remy is auriferous. Florry is soapy. Jared is bold. If Florry is diminutive and Florry is auriferous then Florry is bold. All diminutive things are not bold. White things are diminutive. If something is diminutive then it is soapy. Red things are nameless. If something is swollen and not nameless then it is contraband. Jared is swollen.", "logic": "\nAuriferous(remy)\nSoapy(florry)\nBold(jared)\nDiminutive(florry) and Auriferous(florry) -> Bold(florry)\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> not Bold(x))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) -> Nameless(x))\nforall x (Swollen(x) and not Nameless(x) -> Contraband(x))\n\nSwollen(jared)\n\nSwollen(jared) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Collins is solvent. Davita is polytonal. Butler is juicy. If Davita is vernacular and Davita is solvent then Davita is juicy. All vernacular things are not juicy. White things are vernacular. If something is vernacular then it is polytonal. Red things are heuristic. If something is spheroidal and not heuristic then it is inviolable. Davita is not spheroidal.", "logic": "\nSolvent(collins)\nPolytonal(davita)\nJuicy(butler)\nVernacular(davita) and Solvent(davita) -> Juicy(davita)\nforall x (Vernacular(x) -> not Juicy(x))\nforall x (Solvent(x) -> Vernacular(x))\nforall x (Vernacular(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Heuristic(x))\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) and not Heuristic(x) -> Inviolable(x))\n\nnot Spheroidal(davita)\n\nnot Spheroidal(davita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Della is palish. Debor is precise. Legra is roan. If Debor is capital and Debor is palish then Debor is roan. All capital things are not roan. White things are capital. If something is capital then it is precise. Red things are lowset. If something is humified and not lowset then it is starboard. Della is humified.", "logic": "\nPalish(della)\nPrecise(debor)\nRoan(legra)\nCapital(debor) and Palish(debor) -> Roan(debor)\nforall x (Capital(x) -> not Roan(x))\nforall x (Palish(x) -> Capital(x))\nforall x (Capital(x) -> Precise(x))\nforall x (Precise(x) -> Lowset(x))\nforall x (Humified(x) and not Lowset(x) -> Starboard(x))\n\nHumified(della)\n\nHumified(della) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1046"} {"premises": "Ingunna is gratis. Simonne is henpecked. Simonne is customary. If Ingunna is henpecked then Ingunna is customary. If someone is gratis then they are henpecked. If someone is unoriented then they are meandering. Red people are unoriented. All henpecked people are unoriented. If someone is customary and meandering then they are henpecked. Simonne is henpecked.", "logic": "\nGratis(ingunna)\nHenpecked(simonne)\nCustomary(simonne)\nHenpecked(ingunna) -> Customary(ingunna)\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> Henpecked(x))\nforall x (Unoriented(x) -> Meandering(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Unoriented(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Unoriented(x))\nforall x (Customary(x) and Meandering(x) -> Henpecked(x))\n\nHenpecked(simonne)\n\ntherefore Henpecked(simonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Sioux is cordiform. Annamaria is abulic. Annamaria is visualized. If Sioux is abulic then Sioux is visualized. If someone is cordiform then they are abulic. If someone is tactful then they are epizootic. Red people are tactful. All abulic people are tactful. If someone is visualized and epizootic then they are abulic. Sioux is not cordiform.", "logic": "\nCordiform(sioux)\nAbulic(annamaria)\nVisualized(annamaria)\nAbulic(sioux) -> Visualized(sioux)\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> Abulic(x))\nforall x (Tactful(x) -> Epizootic(x))\nforall x (Lovable(x) -> Tactful(x))\nforall x (Abulic(x) -> Tactful(x))\nforall x (Visualized(x) and Epizootic(x) -> Abulic(x))\n\nnot Cordiform(sioux)\n\ntherefore Cordiform(sioux)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Mahala is debile. Ranique is glial. Ranique is brainish. If Mahala is glial then Mahala is brainish. If someone is debile then they are glial. If someone is cationic then they are uncharged. Red people are cationic. All glial people are cationic. If someone is brainish and uncharged then they are glial. Mahala is glial.", "logic": "\nDebile(mahala)\nGlial(ranique)\nBrainish(ranique)\nGlial(mahala) -> Brainish(mahala)\nforall x (Debile(x) -> Glial(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Invisible(x) -> Cationic(x))\nforall x (Glial(x) -> Cationic(x))\nforall x (Brainish(x) and Uncharged(x) -> Glial(x))\n\nGlial(mahala)\n\nDebile(mahala) and forall x (Debile(x) -> Glial(x)) -> therefore Glial(mahala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Rhonda is diffusive. Brit is plodding. Brit is ciliary. If Rhonda is plodding then Rhonda is ciliary. If someone is diffusive then they are plodding. If someone is propulsive then they are unsated. Red people are propulsive. All plodding people are propulsive. If someone is ciliary and unsated then they are plodding. Rhonda is not plodding.", "logic": "\nDiffusive(rhonda)\nPlodding(brit)\nCiliary(brit)\nPlodding(rhonda) -> Ciliary(rhonda)\nforall x (Diffusive(x) -> Plodding(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) -> Unsated(x))\nforall x (Arillate(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Plodding(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Ciliary(x) and Unsated(x) -> Plodding(x))\n\nnot Plodding(rhonda)\n\nDiffusive(rhonda) and forall x (Diffusive(x) -> Plodding(x)) -> therefore Plodding(rhonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Friedric is basiscopic. Ventura is slowgoing. Ventura is unwrinkled. If Friedric is slowgoing then Friedric is unwrinkled. If someone is basiscopic then they are slowgoing. If someone is pulverised then they are smoothened. Red people are pulverised. All slowgoing people are pulverised. If someone is unwrinkled and smoothened then they are slowgoing. Friedric is pulverised.", "logic": "\nBasiscopic(friedric)\nSlowgoing(ventura)\nUnwrinkled(ventura)\nSlowgoing(friedric) -> Unwrinkled(friedric)\nforall x (Basiscopic(x) -> Slowgoing(x))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) -> Smoothened(x))\nforall x (Metastatic(x) -> Pulverised(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Pulverised(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) and Smoothened(x) -> Slowgoing(x))\n\nPulverised(friedric)\n\nBasiscopic(friedric) and forall x (Basiscopic(x) -> Slowgoing(x)) -> therefore Slowgoing(friedric) Slowgoing(friedric) and forall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Pulverised(x)) -> therefore Pulverised(friedric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Stanford is tactless. Elwira is vestigial. Elwira is involved. If Stanford is vestigial then Stanford is involved. If someone is tactless then they are vestigial. If someone is piercing then they are witting. Red people are piercing. All vestigial people are piercing. If someone is involved and witting then they are vestigial. Elwira is not witting.", "logic": "\nTactless(stanford)\nVestigial(elwira)\nInvolved(elwira)\nVestigial(stanford) -> Involved(stanford)\nforall x (Tactless(x) -> Vestigial(x))\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Witting(x))\nforall x (Heedless(x) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Vestigial(x) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) and Witting(x) -> Vestigial(x))\n\nnot Witting(elwira)\n\nVestigial(elwira) and forall x (Vestigial(x) -> Piercing(x)) -> therefore Piercing(elwira) Piercing(elwira) and forall x (Piercing(x) -> Witting(x)) -> therefore Witting(elwira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Ransom is inflexible. Adrianna is chapped. Adrianna is aslope. If Ransom is chapped then Ransom is aslope. If someone is inflexible then they are chapped. If someone is erogenous then they are rubbery. Red people are erogenous. All chapped people are erogenous. If someone is aslope and rubbery then they are chapped. Ransom is rubbery.", "logic": "\nInflexible(ransom)\nChapped(adrianna)\nAslope(adrianna)\nChapped(ransom) -> Aslope(ransom)\nforall x (Inflexible(x) -> Chapped(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Glary(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Chapped(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Aslope(x) and Rubbery(x) -> Chapped(x))\n\nRubbery(ransom)\n\nInflexible(ransom) and forall x (Inflexible(x) -> Chapped(x)) -> therefore Chapped(ransom) Chapped(ransom) and forall x (Chapped(x) -> Erogenous(x)) -> therefore Erogenous(ransom) Erogenous(ransom) and forall x (Erogenous(x) -> Rubbery(x)) -> therefore Rubbery(ransom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Elliot is murdered. Millie is sandy. Millie is sozzled. If Elliot is sandy then Elliot is sozzled. If someone is murdered then they are sandy. If someone is infirm then they are semirigid. Red people are infirm. All sandy people are infirm. If someone is sozzled and semirigid then they are sandy. Elliot is not semirigid.", "logic": "\nMurdered(elliot)\nSandy(millie)\nSozzled(millie)\nSandy(elliot) -> Sozzled(elliot)\nforall x (Murdered(x) -> Sandy(x))\nforall x (Infirm(x) -> Semirigid(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Infirm(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) -> Infirm(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) and Semirigid(x) -> Sandy(x))\n\nnot Semirigid(elliot)\n\nMurdered(elliot) and forall x (Murdered(x) -> Sandy(x)) -> therefore Sandy(elliot) Sandy(elliot) and forall x (Sandy(x) -> Infirm(x)) -> therefore Infirm(elliot) Infirm(elliot) and forall x (Infirm(x) -> Semirigid(x)) -> therefore Semirigid(elliot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Rubia is feckless. Dani is bowing. Dani is unaided. If Rubia is bowing then Rubia is unaided. If someone is feckless then they are bowing. If someone is expiatory then they are discursive. Red people are expiatory. All bowing people are expiatory. If someone is unaided and discursive then they are bowing. Dani is not staged.", "logic": "\nFeckless(rubia)\nBowing(dani)\nUnaided(dani)\nBowing(rubia) -> Unaided(rubia)\nforall x (Feckless(x) -> Bowing(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) -> Discursive(x))\nforall x (Staged(x) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Bowing(x) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Unaided(x) and Discursive(x) -> Bowing(x))\n\nnot Staged(dani)\n\nnot Staged(dani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Melosa is ambulant. Reuven is immature. Reuven is credulous. If Melosa is immature then Melosa is credulous. If someone is ambulant then they are immature. If someone is holozoic then they are jawless. Red people are holozoic. All immature people are holozoic. If someone is credulous and jawless then they are immature. Reuven is quiet.", "logic": "\nAmbulant(melosa)\nImmature(reuven)\nCredulous(reuven)\nImmature(melosa) -> Credulous(melosa)\nforall x (Ambulant(x) -> Immature(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Jawless(x))\nforall x (Unliveable(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Credulous(x) and Jawless(x) -> Immature(x))\n\nQuiet(reuven)\n\nQuiet(reuven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Archibold is beadlike. Clary is scorbutic. Clary is sporadic. If Archibold is scorbutic then Archibold is sporadic. If someone is beadlike then they are scorbutic. If someone is sunlit then they are resettled. Red people are sunlit. All scorbutic people are sunlit. If someone is sporadic and resettled then they are scorbutic. Archibold is not quiet.", "logic": "\nBeadlike(archibold)\nScorbutic(clary)\nSporadic(clary)\nScorbutic(archibold) -> Sporadic(archibold)\nforall x (Beadlike(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) -> Resettled(x))\nforall x (Leavened(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) and Resettled(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\n\nnot Quiet(archibold)\n\nnot Quiet(archibold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "Rudolf is boxy. Betti is birch. Betti is gauche. If Rudolf is birch then Rudolf is gauche. If someone is boxy then they are birch. If someone is credible then they are affixed. Red people are credible. All birch people are credible. If someone is gauche and affixed then they are birch. Betti is boxy.", "logic": "\nBoxy(rudolf)\nBirch(betti)\nGauche(betti)\nBirch(rudolf) -> Gauche(rudolf)\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Birch(x))\nforall x (Credible(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Greased(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Birch(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Affixed(x) -> Birch(x))\n\nBoxy(betti)\n\nBoxy(betti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The mady regard the brunhilda. The mady regard the minna. The mady is repeatable. The mady is haploidic. The mady tiller the brunhilda. The brunhilda regard the minna. The brunhilda is mirthful. The brunhilda is haploidic. The brunhilda tiller the mady. The minna amaze the mady. The minna amaze the brunhilda. The minna regard the mady. The minna regard the brunhilda. The minna is mirthful. The minna tiller the mady. The minna tiller the brunhilda. If the brunhilda amaze the mady and the mady regard the minna then the brunhilda is culpable. If something regard the mady then it tiller the mady. If something tiller the minna then it regard the mady. If the mady regard the minna and the minna tiller the brunhilda then the mady tiller the brunhilda. If something amaze the minna and the minna amaze the brunhilda then the minna is culpable. If something tiller the minna then it amaze the mady. If something amaze the mady then the mady tiller the minna. If the minna regard the brunhilda and the minna is culpable then the minna tiller the brunhilda. The mady is repeatable.", "logic": "\nRegard(mady, brunhilda)\nRegard(mady, minna)\nRepeatable(mady)\nHaploidic(mady)\nTiller(mady, brunhilda)\nRegard(brunhilda, minna)\nMirthful(brunhilda)\nHaploidic(brunhilda)\nTiller(brunhilda, mady)\nAmaze(minna, mady)\nAmaze(minna, brunhilda)\nRegard(minna, mady)\nRegard(minna, brunhilda)\nMirthful(minna)\nTiller(minna, mady)\nTiller(minna, brunhilda)\nAmaze(brunhilda, mady) and Regard(mady, minna) -> Culpable(brunhilda)\nforall x (Regard(x, mady) -> Tiller(x, mady))\nforall x (Tiller(x, minna) -> Regard(x, mady))\nRegard(mady, minna) and Tiller(minna, brunhilda) -> Tiller(mady, brunhilda)\nforall x (Amaze(x, minna) and Amaze(minna, brunhilda) -> Culpable(minna))\nforall x (Tiller(x, minna) -> Amaze(x, mady))\nforall x (Amaze(x, mady) -> Tiller(mady, minna))\nRegard(minna, brunhilda) and Culpable(minna) -> Tiller(minna, brunhilda)\n\nRepeatable(mady)\n\ntherefore Repeatable(mady)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The abdullah thieve the von. The abdullah thieve the lazar. The abdullah is vicenary. The abdullah is slumberous. The abdullah boil the von. The von thieve the lazar. The von is hellish. The von is slumberous. The von boil the abdullah. The lazar sell the abdullah. The lazar sell the von. The lazar thieve the abdullah. The lazar thieve the von. The lazar is hellish. The lazar boil the abdullah. The lazar boil the von. If the von sell the abdullah and the abdullah thieve the lazar then the von is harsh. If something thieve the abdullah then it boil the abdullah. If something boil the lazar then it thieve the abdullah. If the abdullah thieve the lazar and the lazar boil the von then the abdullah boil the von. If something sell the lazar and the lazar sell the von then the lazar is harsh. If something boil the lazar then it sell the abdullah. If something sell the abdullah then the abdullah boil the lazar. If the lazar thieve the von and the lazar is harsh then the lazar boil the von. The lazar does not need the abdullah.", "logic": "\nThieve(abdullah, von)\nThieve(abdullah, lazar)\nVicenary(abdullah)\nSlumberous(abdullah)\nBoil(abdullah, von)\nThieve(von, lazar)\nHellish(von)\nSlumberous(von)\nBoil(von, abdullah)\nSell(lazar, abdullah)\nSell(lazar, von)\nThieve(lazar, abdullah)\nThieve(lazar, von)\nHellish(lazar)\nBoil(lazar, abdullah)\nBoil(lazar, von)\nSell(von, abdullah) and Thieve(abdullah, lazar) -> Harsh(von)\nforall x (Thieve(x, abdullah) -> Boil(x, abdullah))\nforall x (Boil(x, lazar) -> Thieve(x, abdullah))\nThieve(abdullah, lazar) and Boil(lazar, von) -> Boil(abdullah, von)\nforall x (Sell(x, lazar) and Sell(lazar, von) -> Harsh(lazar))\nforall x (Boil(x, lazar) -> Sell(x, abdullah))\nforall x (Sell(x, abdullah) -> Boil(abdullah, lazar))\nThieve(lazar, von) and Harsh(lazar) -> Boil(lazar, von)\n\nnot Boil(lazar, abdullah)\n\ntherefore Boil(lazar, abdullah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The dinah misspell the ceil. The dinah misspell the shirline. The dinah is eldritch. The dinah is asunder. The dinah quantise the ceil. The ceil misspell the shirline. The ceil is cypriote. The ceil is asunder. The ceil quantise the dinah. The shirline factorize the dinah. The shirline factorize the ceil. The shirline misspell the dinah. The shirline misspell the ceil. The shirline is cypriote. The shirline quantise the dinah. The shirline quantise the ceil. If the ceil factorize the dinah and the dinah misspell the shirline then the ceil is lucifugal. If something misspell the dinah then it quantise the dinah. If something quantise the shirline then it misspell the dinah. If the dinah misspell the shirline and the shirline quantise the ceil then the dinah quantise the ceil. If something factorize the shirline and the shirline factorize the ceil then the shirline is lucifugal. If something quantise the shirline then it factorize the dinah. If something factorize the dinah then the dinah quantise the shirline. If the shirline misspell the ceil and the shirline is lucifugal then the shirline quantise the ceil. The dinah quantise the shirline.", "logic": "\nMisspell(dinah, ceil)\nMisspell(dinah, shirline)\nEldritch(dinah)\nAsunder(dinah)\nQuantise(dinah, ceil)\nMisspell(ceil, shirline)\nCypriote(ceil)\nAsunder(ceil)\nQuantise(ceil, dinah)\nFactorize(shirline, dinah)\nFactorize(shirline, ceil)\nMisspell(shirline, dinah)\nMisspell(shirline, ceil)\nCypriote(shirline)\nQuantise(shirline, dinah)\nQuantise(shirline, ceil)\nFactorize(ceil, dinah) and Misspell(dinah, shirline) -> Lucifugal(ceil)\nforall x (Misspell(x, dinah) -> Quantise(x, dinah))\nforall x (Quantise(x, shirline) -> Misspell(x, dinah))\nMisspell(dinah, shirline) and Quantise(shirline, ceil) -> Quantise(dinah, ceil)\nforall x (Factorize(x, shirline) and Factorize(shirline, ceil) -> Lucifugal(shirline))\nforall x (Quantise(x, shirline) -> Factorize(x, dinah))\nforall x (Factorize(x, dinah) -> Quantise(dinah, shirline))\nMisspell(shirline, ceil) and Lucifugal(shirline) -> Quantise(shirline, ceil)\n\nQuantise(dinah, shirline)\n\nFactorize(shirline, dinah) and forall x (Factorize(x, dinah) -> Quantise(dinah, shirline)) -> therefore Quantise(dinah, shirline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The bradley lope the marylynne. The bradley lope the catharina. The bradley is varicose. The bradley is gratis. The bradley shave the marylynne. The marylynne lope the catharina. The marylynne is anomic. The marylynne is gratis. The marylynne shave the bradley. The catharina categorise the bradley. The catharina categorise the marylynne. The catharina lope the bradley. The catharina lope the marylynne. The catharina is anomic. The catharina shave the bradley. The catharina shave the marylynne. If the marylynne categorise the bradley and the bradley lope the catharina then the marylynne is ineffable. If something lope the bradley then it shave the bradley. If something shave the catharina then it lope the bradley. If the bradley lope the catharina and the catharina shave the marylynne then the bradley shave the marylynne. If something categorise the catharina and the catharina categorise the marylynne then the catharina is ineffable. If something shave the catharina then it categorise the bradley. If something categorise the bradley then the bradley shave the catharina. If the catharina lope the marylynne and the catharina is ineffable then the catharina shave the marylynne. The bradley does not need the catharina.", "logic": "\nLope(bradley, marylynne)\nLope(bradley, catharina)\nVaricose(bradley)\nGratis(bradley)\nShave(bradley, marylynne)\nLope(marylynne, catharina)\nAnomic(marylynne)\nGratis(marylynne)\nShave(marylynne, bradley)\nCategorise(catharina, bradley)\nCategorise(catharina, marylynne)\nLope(catharina, bradley)\nLope(catharina, marylynne)\nAnomic(catharina)\nShave(catharina, bradley)\nShave(catharina, marylynne)\nCategorise(marylynne, bradley) and Lope(bradley, catharina) -> Ineffable(marylynne)\nforall x (Lope(x, bradley) -> Shave(x, bradley))\nforall x (Shave(x, catharina) -> Lope(x, bradley))\nLope(bradley, catharina) and Shave(catharina, marylynne) -> Shave(bradley, marylynne)\nforall x (Categorise(x, catharina) and Categorise(catharina, marylynne) -> Ineffable(catharina))\nforall x (Shave(x, catharina) -> Categorise(x, bradley))\nforall x (Categorise(x, bradley) -> Shave(bradley, catharina))\nLope(catharina, marylynne) and Ineffable(catharina) -> Shave(catharina, marylynne)\n\nnot Shave(bradley, catharina)\n\nCategorise(catharina, bradley) and forall x (Categorise(x, bradley) -> Shave(bradley, catharina)) -> therefore Shave(bradley, catharina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The lancelot supersede the silvia. The lancelot supersede the urbain. The lancelot is bosomed. The lancelot is unshielded. The lancelot instil the silvia. The silvia supersede the urbain. The silvia is radial. The silvia is unshielded. The silvia instil the lancelot. The urbain ostentate the lancelot. The urbain ostentate the silvia. The urbain supersede the lancelot. The urbain supersede the silvia. The urbain is radial. The urbain instil the lancelot. The urbain instil the silvia. If the silvia ostentate the lancelot and the lancelot supersede the urbain then the silvia is seedy. If something supersede the lancelot then it instil the lancelot. If something instil the urbain then it supersede the lancelot. If the lancelot supersede the urbain and the urbain instil the silvia then the lancelot instil the silvia. If something ostentate the urbain and the urbain ostentate the silvia then the urbain is seedy. If something instil the urbain then it ostentate the lancelot. If something ostentate the lancelot then the lancelot instil the urbain. If the urbain supersede the silvia and the urbain is seedy then the urbain instil the silvia. The lancelot supersede the lancelot.", "logic": "\nSupersede(lancelot, silvia)\nSupersede(lancelot, urbain)\nBosomed(lancelot)\nUnshielded(lancelot)\nInstil(lancelot, silvia)\nSupersede(silvia, urbain)\nRadial(silvia)\nUnshielded(silvia)\nInstil(silvia, lancelot)\nOstentate(urbain, lancelot)\nOstentate(urbain, silvia)\nSupersede(urbain, lancelot)\nSupersede(urbain, silvia)\nRadial(urbain)\nInstil(urbain, lancelot)\nInstil(urbain, silvia)\nOstentate(silvia, lancelot) and Supersede(lancelot, urbain) -> Seedy(silvia)\nforall x (Supersede(x, lancelot) -> Instil(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Instil(x, urbain) -> Supersede(x, lancelot))\nSupersede(lancelot, urbain) and Instil(urbain, silvia) -> Instil(lancelot, silvia)\nforall x (Ostentate(x, urbain) and Ostentate(urbain, silvia) -> Seedy(urbain))\nforall x (Instil(x, urbain) -> Ostentate(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Ostentate(x, lancelot) -> Instil(lancelot, urbain))\nSupersede(urbain, silvia) and Seedy(urbain) -> Instil(urbain, silvia)\n\nSupersede(lancelot, lancelot)\n\nOstentate(urbain, lancelot) and forall x (Ostentate(x, lancelot) -> Instil(lancelot, urbain)) -> therefore Instil(lancelot, urbain) Instil(lancelot, urbain) and forall x (Instil(x, urbain) -> Supersede(x, lancelot)) -> therefore Supersede(lancelot, lancelot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The maure fancify the coleen. The maure fancify the edithe. The maure is comforting. The maure is alone. The maure repay the coleen. The coleen fancify the edithe. The coleen is silty. The coleen is alone. The coleen repay the maure. The edithe cloister the maure. The edithe cloister the coleen. The edithe fancify the maure. The edithe fancify the coleen. The edithe is silty. The edithe repay the maure. The edithe repay the coleen. If the coleen cloister the maure and the maure fancify the edithe then the coleen is treasonous. If something fancify the maure then it repay the maure. If something repay the edithe then it fancify the maure. If the maure fancify the edithe and the edithe repay the coleen then the maure repay the coleen. If something cloister the edithe and the edithe cloister the coleen then the edithe is treasonous. If something repay the edithe then it cloister the maure. If something cloister the maure then the maure repay the edithe. If the edithe fancify the coleen and the edithe is treasonous then the edithe repay the coleen. The maure does not chase the maure.", "logic": "\nFancify(maure, coleen)\nFancify(maure, edithe)\nComforting(maure)\nAlone(maure)\nRepay(maure, coleen)\nFancify(coleen, edithe)\nSilty(coleen)\nAlone(coleen)\nRepay(coleen, maure)\nCloister(edithe, maure)\nCloister(edithe, coleen)\nFancify(edithe, maure)\nFancify(edithe, coleen)\nSilty(edithe)\nRepay(edithe, maure)\nRepay(edithe, coleen)\nCloister(coleen, maure) and Fancify(maure, edithe) -> Treasonous(coleen)\nforall x (Fancify(x, maure) -> Repay(x, maure))\nforall x (Repay(x, edithe) -> Fancify(x, maure))\nFancify(maure, edithe) and Repay(edithe, coleen) -> Repay(maure, coleen)\nforall x (Cloister(x, edithe) and Cloister(edithe, coleen) -> Treasonous(edithe))\nforall x (Repay(x, edithe) -> Cloister(x, maure))\nforall x (Cloister(x, maure) -> Repay(maure, edithe))\nFancify(edithe, coleen) and Treasonous(edithe) -> Repay(edithe, coleen)\n\nnot Cloister(maure, maure)\n\nCloister(edithe, maure) and forall x (Cloister(x, maure) -> Repay(maure, edithe)) -> therefore Repay(maure, edithe) Repay(maure, edithe) and forall x (Repay(x, edithe) -> Cloister(x, maure)) -> therefore Cloister(maure, maure)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The mae overstress the buddy. The mae overstress the tilda. The mae is driving. The mae is innocent. The mae symphonize the buddy. The buddy overstress the tilda. The buddy is hypnoid. The buddy is innocent. The buddy symphonize the mae. The tilda mongrelize the mae. The tilda mongrelize the buddy. The tilda overstress the mae. The tilda overstress the buddy. The tilda is hypnoid. The tilda symphonize the mae. The tilda symphonize the buddy. If the buddy mongrelize the mae and the mae overstress the tilda then the buddy is maltreated. If something overstress the mae then it symphonize the mae. If something symphonize the tilda then it overstress the mae. If the mae overstress the tilda and the tilda symphonize the buddy then the mae symphonize the buddy. If something mongrelize the tilda and the tilda mongrelize the buddy then the tilda is maltreated. If something symphonize the tilda then it mongrelize the mae. If something mongrelize the mae then the mae symphonize the tilda. If the tilda overstress the buddy and the tilda is maltreated then the tilda symphonize the buddy. The mae symphonize the mae.", "logic": "\nOverstress(mae, buddy)\nOverstress(mae, tilda)\nDriving(mae)\nInnocent(mae)\nSymphonize(mae, buddy)\nOverstress(buddy, tilda)\nHypnoid(buddy)\nInnocent(buddy)\nSymphonize(buddy, mae)\nMongrelize(tilda, mae)\nMongrelize(tilda, buddy)\nOverstress(tilda, mae)\nOverstress(tilda, buddy)\nHypnoid(tilda)\nSymphonize(tilda, mae)\nSymphonize(tilda, buddy)\nMongrelize(buddy, mae) and Overstress(mae, tilda) -> Maltreated(buddy)\nforall x (Overstress(x, mae) -> Symphonize(x, mae))\nforall x (Symphonize(x, tilda) -> Overstress(x, mae))\nOverstress(mae, tilda) and Symphonize(tilda, buddy) -> Symphonize(mae, buddy)\nforall x (Mongrelize(x, tilda) and Mongrelize(tilda, buddy) -> Maltreated(tilda))\nforall x (Symphonize(x, tilda) -> Mongrelize(x, mae))\nforall x (Mongrelize(x, mae) -> Symphonize(mae, tilda))\nOverstress(tilda, buddy) and Maltreated(tilda) -> Symphonize(tilda, buddy)\n\nSymphonize(mae, mae)\n\nMongrelize(tilda, mae) and forall x (Mongrelize(x, mae) -> Symphonize(mae, tilda)) -> therefore Symphonize(mae, tilda) Symphonize(mae, tilda) and forall x (Symphonize(x, tilda) -> Overstress(x, mae)) -> therefore Overstress(mae, mae) Overstress(mae, mae) and forall x (Overstress(x, mae) -> Symphonize(x, mae)) -> therefore Symphonize(mae, mae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The antonia confute the sandy. The antonia confute the celesta. The antonia is jocose. The antonia is tactual. The antonia reassess the sandy. The sandy confute the celesta. The sandy is immovable. The sandy is tactual. The sandy reassess the antonia. The celesta induce the antonia. The celesta induce the sandy. The celesta confute the antonia. The celesta confute the sandy. The celesta is immovable. The celesta reassess the antonia. The celesta reassess the sandy. If the sandy induce the antonia and the antonia confute the celesta then the sandy is sumptuary. If something confute the antonia then it reassess the antonia. If something reassess the celesta then it confute the antonia. If the antonia confute the celesta and the celesta reassess the sandy then the antonia reassess the sandy. If something induce the celesta and the celesta induce the sandy then the celesta is sumptuary. If something reassess the celesta then it induce the antonia. If something induce the antonia then the antonia reassess the celesta. If the celesta confute the sandy and the celesta is sumptuary then the celesta reassess the sandy. The antonia does not need the antonia.", "logic": "\nConfute(antonia, sandy)\nConfute(antonia, celesta)\nJocose(antonia)\nTactual(antonia)\nReassess(antonia, sandy)\nConfute(sandy, celesta)\nImmovable(sandy)\nTactual(sandy)\nReassess(sandy, antonia)\nInduce(celesta, antonia)\nInduce(celesta, sandy)\nConfute(celesta, antonia)\nConfute(celesta, sandy)\nImmovable(celesta)\nReassess(celesta, antonia)\nReassess(celesta, sandy)\nInduce(sandy, antonia) and Confute(antonia, celesta) -> Sumptuary(sandy)\nforall x (Confute(x, antonia) -> Reassess(x, antonia))\nforall x (Reassess(x, celesta) -> Confute(x, antonia))\nConfute(antonia, celesta) and Reassess(celesta, sandy) -> Reassess(antonia, sandy)\nforall x (Induce(x, celesta) and Induce(celesta, sandy) -> Sumptuary(celesta))\nforall x (Reassess(x, celesta) -> Induce(x, antonia))\nforall x (Induce(x, antonia) -> Reassess(antonia, celesta))\nConfute(celesta, sandy) and Sumptuary(celesta) -> Reassess(celesta, sandy)\n\nnot Reassess(antonia, antonia)\n\nInduce(celesta, antonia) and forall x (Induce(x, antonia) -> Reassess(antonia, celesta)) -> therefore Reassess(antonia, celesta) Reassess(antonia, celesta) and forall x (Reassess(x, celesta) -> Confute(x, antonia)) -> therefore Confute(antonia, antonia) Confute(antonia, antonia) and forall x (Confute(x, antonia) -> Reassess(x, antonia)) -> therefore Reassess(antonia, antonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The shannan effectuate the selina. The shannan effectuate the sheeree. The shannan is clangorous. The shannan is toxicant. The shannan airt the selina. The selina effectuate the sheeree. The selina is billionth. The selina is toxicant. The selina airt the shannan. The sheeree circuit the shannan. The sheeree circuit the selina. The sheeree effectuate the shannan. The sheeree effectuate the selina. The sheeree is billionth. The sheeree airt the shannan. The sheeree airt the selina. If the selina circuit the shannan and the shannan effectuate the sheeree then the selina is encased. If something effectuate the shannan then it airt the shannan. If something airt the sheeree then it effectuate the shannan. If the shannan effectuate the sheeree and the sheeree airt the selina then the shannan airt the selina. If something circuit the sheeree and the sheeree circuit the selina then the sheeree is encased. If something airt the sheeree then it circuit the shannan. If something circuit the shannan then the shannan airt the sheeree. If the sheeree effectuate the selina and the sheeree is encased then the sheeree airt the selina. The selina is not encased.", "logic": "\nEffectuate(shannan, selina)\nEffectuate(shannan, sheeree)\nClangorous(shannan)\nToxicant(shannan)\nAirt(shannan, selina)\nEffectuate(selina, sheeree)\nBillionth(selina)\nToxicant(selina)\nAirt(selina, shannan)\nCircuit(sheeree, shannan)\nCircuit(sheeree, selina)\nEffectuate(sheeree, shannan)\nEffectuate(sheeree, selina)\nBillionth(sheeree)\nAirt(sheeree, shannan)\nAirt(sheeree, selina)\nCircuit(selina, shannan) and Effectuate(shannan, sheeree) -> Encased(selina)\nforall x (Effectuate(x, shannan) -> Airt(x, shannan))\nforall x (Airt(x, sheeree) -> Effectuate(x, shannan))\nEffectuate(shannan, sheeree) and Airt(sheeree, selina) -> Airt(shannan, selina)\nforall x (Circuit(x, sheeree) and Circuit(sheeree, selina) -> Encased(sheeree))\nforall x (Airt(x, sheeree) -> Circuit(x, shannan))\nforall x (Circuit(x, shannan) -> Airt(shannan, sheeree))\nEffectuate(sheeree, selina) and Encased(sheeree) -> Airt(sheeree, selina)\n\nnot Encased(selina)\n\nCircuit(selina, shannan) and Effectuate(shannan, sheeree) -> Encased(selina) <- forall x (Airt(x, sheeree) -> Circuit(x, shannan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The pincus hone the jemmy. The pincus hone the jervis. The pincus is bracing. The pincus is azotemic. The pincus wedge the jemmy. The jemmy hone the jervis. The jemmy is foaming. The jemmy is azotemic. The jemmy wedge the pincus. The jervis bungle the pincus. The jervis bungle the jemmy. The jervis hone the pincus. The jervis hone the jemmy. The jervis is foaming. The jervis wedge the pincus. The jervis wedge the jemmy. If the jemmy bungle the pincus and the pincus hone the jervis then the jemmy is shortish. If something hone the pincus then it wedge the pincus. If something wedge the jervis then it hone the pincus. If the pincus hone the jervis and the jervis wedge the jemmy then the pincus wedge the jemmy. If something bungle the jervis and the jervis bungle the jemmy then the jervis is shortish. If something wedge the jervis then it bungle the pincus. If something bungle the pincus then the pincus wedge the jervis. If the jervis hone the jemmy and the jervis is shortish then the jervis wedge the jemmy. The jervis is shortish.", "logic": "\nHone(pincus, jemmy)\nHone(pincus, jervis)\nBracing(pincus)\nAzotemic(pincus)\nWedge(pincus, jemmy)\nHone(jemmy, jervis)\nFoaming(jemmy)\nAzotemic(jemmy)\nWedge(jemmy, pincus)\nBungle(jervis, pincus)\nBungle(jervis, jemmy)\nHone(jervis, pincus)\nHone(jervis, jemmy)\nFoaming(jervis)\nWedge(jervis, pincus)\nWedge(jervis, jemmy)\nBungle(jemmy, pincus) and Hone(pincus, jervis) -> Shortish(jemmy)\nforall x (Hone(x, pincus) -> Wedge(x, pincus))\nforall x (Wedge(x, jervis) -> Hone(x, pincus))\nHone(pincus, jervis) and Wedge(jervis, jemmy) -> Wedge(pincus, jemmy)\nforall x (Bungle(x, jervis) and Bungle(jervis, jemmy) -> Shortish(jervis))\nforall x (Wedge(x, jervis) -> Bungle(x, pincus))\nforall x (Bungle(x, pincus) -> Wedge(pincus, jervis))\nHone(jervis, jemmy) and Shortish(jervis) -> Wedge(jervis, jemmy)\n\nShortish(jervis)\n\nforall x (Bungle(x, jervis) and Bungle(jervis, jemmy) -> Shortish(jervis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The benedikta umpire the shawna. The benedikta umpire the priscilla. The benedikta is untempting. The benedikta is querulous. The benedikta tent the shawna. The shawna umpire the priscilla. The shawna is deplorable. The shawna is querulous. The shawna tent the benedikta. The priscilla devitalize the benedikta. The priscilla devitalize the shawna. The priscilla umpire the benedikta. The priscilla umpire the shawna. The priscilla is deplorable. The priscilla tent the benedikta. The priscilla tent the shawna. If the shawna devitalize the benedikta and the benedikta umpire the priscilla then the shawna is middling. If something umpire the benedikta then it tent the benedikta. If something tent the priscilla then it umpire the benedikta. If the benedikta umpire the priscilla and the priscilla tent the shawna then the benedikta tent the shawna. If something devitalize the priscilla and the priscilla devitalize the shawna then the priscilla is middling. If something tent the priscilla then it devitalize the benedikta. If something devitalize the benedikta then the benedikta tent the priscilla. If the priscilla umpire the shawna and the priscilla is middling then the priscilla tent the shawna. The shawna does not chase the benedikta.", "logic": "\nUmpire(benedikta, shawna)\nUmpire(benedikta, priscilla)\nUntempting(benedikta)\nQuerulous(benedikta)\nTent(benedikta, shawna)\nUmpire(shawna, priscilla)\nDeplorable(shawna)\nQuerulous(shawna)\nTent(shawna, benedikta)\nDevitalize(priscilla, benedikta)\nDevitalize(priscilla, shawna)\nUmpire(priscilla, benedikta)\nUmpire(priscilla, shawna)\nDeplorable(priscilla)\nTent(priscilla, benedikta)\nTent(priscilla, shawna)\nDevitalize(shawna, benedikta) and Umpire(benedikta, priscilla) -> Middling(shawna)\nforall x (Umpire(x, benedikta) -> Tent(x, benedikta))\nforall x (Tent(x, priscilla) -> Umpire(x, benedikta))\nUmpire(benedikta, priscilla) and Tent(priscilla, shawna) -> Tent(benedikta, shawna)\nforall x (Devitalize(x, priscilla) and Devitalize(priscilla, shawna) -> Middling(priscilla))\nforall x (Tent(x, priscilla) -> Devitalize(x, benedikta))\nforall x (Devitalize(x, benedikta) -> Tent(benedikta, priscilla))\nUmpire(priscilla, shawna) and Middling(priscilla) -> Tent(priscilla, shawna)\n\nnot Devitalize(shawna, benedikta)\n\nforall x (Tent(x, priscilla) -> Devitalize(x, benedikta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The robinet remember the tybie. The robinet remember the shelbi. The robinet is credulous. The robinet is sorted. The robinet forswear the tybie. The tybie remember the shelbi. The tybie is exterior. The tybie is sorted. The tybie forswear the robinet. The shelbi capsulate the robinet. The shelbi capsulate the tybie. The shelbi remember the robinet. The shelbi remember the tybie. The shelbi is exterior. The shelbi forswear the robinet. The shelbi forswear the tybie. If the tybie capsulate the robinet and the robinet remember the shelbi then the tybie is regardful. If something remember the robinet then it forswear the robinet. If something forswear the shelbi then it remember the robinet. If the robinet remember the shelbi and the shelbi forswear the tybie then the robinet forswear the tybie. If something capsulate the shelbi and the shelbi capsulate the tybie then the shelbi is regardful. If something forswear the shelbi then it capsulate the robinet. If something capsulate the robinet then the robinet forswear the shelbi. If the shelbi remember the tybie and the shelbi is regardful then the shelbi forswear the tybie. The tybie remember the robinet.", "logic": "\nRemember(robinet, tybie)\nRemember(robinet, shelbi)\nCredulous(robinet)\nSorted(robinet)\nForswear(robinet, tybie)\nRemember(tybie, shelbi)\nExterior(tybie)\nSorted(tybie)\nForswear(tybie, robinet)\nCapsulate(shelbi, robinet)\nCapsulate(shelbi, tybie)\nRemember(shelbi, robinet)\nRemember(shelbi, tybie)\nExterior(shelbi)\nForswear(shelbi, robinet)\nForswear(shelbi, tybie)\nCapsulate(tybie, robinet) and Remember(robinet, shelbi) -> Regardful(tybie)\nforall x (Remember(x, robinet) -> Forswear(x, robinet))\nforall x (Forswear(x, shelbi) -> Remember(x, robinet))\nRemember(robinet, shelbi) and Forswear(shelbi, tybie) -> Forswear(robinet, tybie)\nforall x (Capsulate(x, shelbi) and Capsulate(shelbi, tybie) -> Regardful(shelbi))\nforall x (Forswear(x, shelbi) -> Capsulate(x, robinet))\nforall x (Capsulate(x, robinet) -> Forswear(robinet, shelbi))\nRemember(shelbi, tybie) and Regardful(shelbi) -> Forswear(shelbi, tybie)\n\nRemember(tybie, robinet)\n\nforall x (Forswear(x, shelbi) -> Remember(x, robinet)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The shep breast the nicol. The shep breast the rosemarie. The shep is insentient. The shep is bilobate. The shep polarize the nicol. The nicol breast the rosemarie. The nicol is ruffled. The nicol is bilobate. The nicol polarize the shep. The rosemarie gorge the shep. The rosemarie gorge the nicol. The rosemarie breast the shep. The rosemarie breast the nicol. The rosemarie is ruffled. The rosemarie polarize the shep. The rosemarie polarize the nicol. If the nicol gorge the shep and the shep breast the rosemarie then the nicol is unshaded. If something breast the shep then it polarize the shep. If something polarize the rosemarie then it breast the shep. If the shep breast the rosemarie and the rosemarie polarize the nicol then the shep polarize the nicol. If something gorge the rosemarie and the rosemarie gorge the nicol then the rosemarie is unshaded. If something polarize the rosemarie then it gorge the shep. If something gorge the shep then the shep polarize the rosemarie. If the rosemarie breast the nicol and the rosemarie is unshaded then the rosemarie polarize the nicol. The rosemarie is not bilobate.", "logic": "\nBreast(shep, nicol)\nBreast(shep, rosemarie)\nInsentient(shep)\nBilobate(shep)\nPolarize(shep, nicol)\nBreast(nicol, rosemarie)\nRuffled(nicol)\nBilobate(nicol)\nPolarize(nicol, shep)\nGorge(rosemarie, shep)\nGorge(rosemarie, nicol)\nBreast(rosemarie, shep)\nBreast(rosemarie, nicol)\nRuffled(rosemarie)\nPolarize(rosemarie, shep)\nPolarize(rosemarie, nicol)\nGorge(nicol, shep) and Breast(shep, rosemarie) -> Unshaded(nicol)\nforall x (Breast(x, shep) -> Polarize(x, shep))\nforall x (Polarize(x, rosemarie) -> Breast(x, shep))\nBreast(shep, rosemarie) and Polarize(rosemarie, nicol) -> Polarize(shep, nicol)\nforall x (Gorge(x, rosemarie) and Gorge(rosemarie, nicol) -> Unshaded(rosemarie))\nforall x (Polarize(x, rosemarie) -> Gorge(x, shep))\nforall x (Gorge(x, shep) -> Polarize(shep, rosemarie))\nBreast(rosemarie, nicol) and Unshaded(rosemarie) -> Polarize(rosemarie, nicol)\n\nnot Bilobate(rosemarie)\n\nnot Bilobate(rosemarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The babs sear the avivah. The babs sear the norris. The babs is autolytic. The babs is disheveled. The babs respect the avivah. The avivah sear the norris. The avivah is coexisting. The avivah is disheveled. The avivah respect the babs. The norris knot the babs. The norris knot the avivah. The norris sear the babs. The norris sear the avivah. The norris is coexisting. The norris respect the babs. The norris respect the avivah. If the avivah knot the babs and the babs sear the norris then the avivah is unkindly. If something sear the babs then it respect the babs. If something respect the norris then it sear the babs. If the babs sear the norris and the norris respect the avivah then the babs respect the avivah. If something knot the norris and the norris knot the avivah then the norris is unkindly. If something respect the norris then it knot the babs. If something knot the babs then the babs respect the norris. If the norris sear the avivah and the norris is unkindly then the norris respect the avivah. The babs knot the norris.", "logic": "\nSear(babs, avivah)\nSear(babs, norris)\nAutolytic(babs)\nDisheveled(babs)\nRespect(babs, avivah)\nSear(avivah, norris)\nCoexisting(avivah)\nDisheveled(avivah)\nRespect(avivah, babs)\nKnot(norris, babs)\nKnot(norris, avivah)\nSear(norris, babs)\nSear(norris, avivah)\nCoexisting(norris)\nRespect(norris, babs)\nRespect(norris, avivah)\nKnot(avivah, babs) and Sear(babs, norris) -> Unkindly(avivah)\nforall x (Sear(x, babs) -> Respect(x, babs))\nforall x (Respect(x, norris) -> Sear(x, babs))\nSear(babs, norris) and Respect(norris, avivah) -> Respect(babs, avivah)\nforall x (Knot(x, norris) and Knot(norris, avivah) -> Unkindly(norris))\nforall x (Respect(x, norris) -> Knot(x, babs))\nforall x (Knot(x, babs) -> Respect(babs, norris))\nSear(norris, avivah) and Unkindly(norris) -> Respect(norris, avivah)\n\nKnot(babs, norris)\n\nKnot(babs, norris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The sophi rafter the dasha. The sophi rafter the tobit. The sophi is awry. The sophi is acherontic. The sophi mark the dasha. The dasha rafter the tobit. The dasha is ophthalmic. The dasha is acherontic. The dasha mark the sophi. The tobit grimace the sophi. The tobit grimace the dasha. The tobit rafter the sophi. The tobit rafter the dasha. The tobit is ophthalmic. The tobit mark the sophi. The tobit mark the dasha. If the dasha grimace the sophi and the sophi rafter the tobit then the dasha is rolling. If something rafter the sophi then it mark the sophi. If something mark the tobit then it rafter the sophi. If the sophi rafter the tobit and the tobit mark the dasha then the sophi mark the dasha. If something grimace the tobit and the tobit grimace the dasha then the tobit is rolling. If something mark the tobit then it grimace the sophi. If something grimace the sophi then the sophi mark the tobit. If the tobit rafter the dasha and the tobit is rolling then the tobit mark the dasha. The tobit does not chase the tobit.", "logic": "\nRafter(sophi, dasha)\nRafter(sophi, tobit)\nAwry(sophi)\nAcherontic(sophi)\nMark(sophi, dasha)\nRafter(dasha, tobit)\nOphthalmic(dasha)\nAcherontic(dasha)\nMark(dasha, sophi)\nGrimace(tobit, sophi)\nGrimace(tobit, dasha)\nRafter(tobit, sophi)\nRafter(tobit, dasha)\nOphthalmic(tobit)\nMark(tobit, sophi)\nMark(tobit, dasha)\nGrimace(dasha, sophi) and Rafter(sophi, tobit) -> Rolling(dasha)\nforall x (Rafter(x, sophi) -> Mark(x, sophi))\nforall x (Mark(x, tobit) -> Rafter(x, sophi))\nRafter(sophi, tobit) and Mark(tobit, dasha) -> Mark(sophi, dasha)\nforall x (Grimace(x, tobit) and Grimace(tobit, dasha) -> Rolling(tobit))\nforall x (Mark(x, tobit) -> Grimace(x, sophi))\nforall x (Grimace(x, sophi) -> Mark(sophi, tobit))\nRafter(tobit, dasha) and Rolling(tobit) -> Mark(tobit, dasha)\n\nnot Grimace(tobit, tobit)\n\nnot Grimace(tobit, tobit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "The darren wound the arthur. The darren wound the justin. The darren is cohesive. The darren is general. The darren nucleate the arthur. The arthur wound the justin. The arthur is afferent. The arthur is general. The arthur nucleate the darren. The justin steal the darren. The justin steal the arthur. The justin wound the darren. The justin wound the arthur. The justin is afferent. The justin nucleate the darren. The justin nucleate the arthur. If the arthur steal the darren and the darren wound the justin then the arthur is imposed. If something wound the darren then it nucleate the darren. If something nucleate the justin then it wound the darren. If the darren wound the justin and the justin nucleate the arthur then the darren nucleate the arthur. If something steal the justin and the justin steal the arthur then the justin is imposed. If something nucleate the justin then it steal the darren. If something steal the darren then the darren nucleate the justin. If the justin wound the arthur and the justin is imposed then the justin nucleate the arthur. The darren is kind.", "logic": "\nWound(darren, arthur)\nWound(darren, justin)\nCohesive(darren)\nGeneral(darren)\nNucleate(darren, arthur)\nWound(arthur, justin)\nAfferent(arthur)\nGeneral(arthur)\nNucleate(arthur, darren)\nSteal(justin, darren)\nSteal(justin, arthur)\nWound(justin, darren)\nWound(justin, arthur)\nAfferent(justin)\nNucleate(justin, darren)\nNucleate(justin, arthur)\nSteal(arthur, darren) and Wound(darren, justin) -> Imposed(arthur)\nforall x (Wound(x, darren) -> Nucleate(x, darren))\nforall x (Nucleate(x, justin) -> Wound(x, darren))\nWound(darren, justin) and Nucleate(justin, arthur) -> Nucleate(darren, arthur)\nforall x (Steal(x, justin) and Steal(justin, arthur) -> Imposed(justin))\nforall x (Nucleate(x, justin) -> Steal(x, darren))\nforall x (Steal(x, darren) -> Nucleate(darren, justin))\nWound(justin, arthur) and Imposed(justin) -> Nucleate(justin, arthur)\n\nKind(darren)\n\nKind(darren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-673"} {"premises": "Rolfe is flagellate. Rolfe is thirsty. Rolfe is major. Rolfe is ranging. Sacha is beamish. Sacha is incomplete. Juli is flagellate. Juli is incomplete. Juli is thirsty. Juli is ranging. If something is ranging then it is major. All witching things are ranging. Kind, beamish things are witching. Rolfe is major.", "logic": "\nFlagellate(rolfe)\nThirsty(rolfe)\nMajor(rolfe)\nRanging(rolfe)\nBeamish(sacha)\nIncomplete(sacha)\nFlagellate(juli)\nIncomplete(juli)\nThirsty(juli)\nRanging(juli)\nforall x (Ranging(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Witching(x) -> Ranging(x))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) and Beamish(x) -> Witching(x))\n\nMajor(rolfe)\n\ntherefore Major(rolfe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Janet is eonian. Janet is unsettled. Janet is uncolumned. Janet is vague. Kristyn is eellike. Kristyn is untrained. Aaron is eonian. Aaron is untrained. Aaron is unsettled. Aaron is vague. If something is vague then it is uncolumned. All marvelous things are vague. Kind, eellike things are marvelous. Janet is not vague.", "logic": "\nEonian(janet)\nUnsettled(janet)\nUncolumned(janet)\nVague(janet)\nEellike(kristyn)\nUntrained(kristyn)\nEonian(aaron)\nUntrained(aaron)\nUnsettled(aaron)\nVague(aaron)\nforall x (Vague(x) -> Uncolumned(x))\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Untrained(x) and Eellike(x) -> Marvelous(x))\n\nnot Vague(janet)\n\ntherefore Vague(janet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Franciska is granted. Franciska is unseeing. Franciska is sleeping. Franciska is unwooded. Damara is catoptric. Damara is tyrannical. Nataline is granted. Nataline is tyrannical. Nataline is unseeing. Nataline is unwooded. If something is unwooded then it is sleeping. All envisioned things are unwooded. Kind, catoptric things are envisioned. Nataline is sleeping.", "logic": "\nGranted(franciska)\nUnseeing(franciska)\nSleeping(franciska)\nUnwooded(franciska)\nCatoptric(damara)\nTyrannical(damara)\nGranted(nataline)\nTyrannical(nataline)\nUnseeing(nataline)\nUnwooded(nataline)\nforall x (Unwooded(x) -> Sleeping(x))\nforall x (Envisioned(x) -> Unwooded(x))\nforall x (Tyrannical(x) and Catoptric(x) -> Envisioned(x))\n\nSleeping(nataline)\n\nUnwooded(nataline) and forall x (Unwooded(x) -> Sleeping(x)) -> therefore Sleeping(nataline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Nesta is armorial. Nesta is womanish. Nesta is renegade. Nesta is hadean. Yaakov is loving. Yaakov is caucasoid. Justine is armorial. Justine is caucasoid. Justine is womanish. Justine is hadean. If something is hadean then it is renegade. All crazed things are hadean. Kind, loving things are crazed. Yaakov is not crazed.", "logic": "\nArmorial(nesta)\nWomanish(nesta)\nRenegade(nesta)\nHadean(nesta)\nLoving(yaakov)\nCaucasoid(yaakov)\nArmorial(justine)\nCaucasoid(justine)\nWomanish(justine)\nHadean(justine)\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Hadean(x))\nforall x (Caucasoid(x) and Loving(x) -> Crazed(x))\n\nnot Crazed(yaakov)\n\nCaucasoid(yaakov) and Loving(yaakov) and forall x (Caucasoid(x) and Loving(x) -> Crazed(x)) -> therefore Crazed(yaakov)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Kitti is stroppy. Kitti is slippery. Kitti is tomentose. Kitti is fortuitous. Alana is cragfast. Alana is bimonthly. Annamaria is stroppy. Annamaria is bimonthly. Annamaria is slippery. Annamaria is fortuitous. If something is fortuitous then it is tomentose. All unpowered things are fortuitous. Kind, cragfast things are unpowered. Alana is fortuitous.", "logic": "\nStroppy(kitti)\nSlippery(kitti)\nTomentose(kitti)\nFortuitous(kitti)\nCragfast(alana)\nBimonthly(alana)\nStroppy(annamaria)\nBimonthly(annamaria)\nSlippery(annamaria)\nFortuitous(annamaria)\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) -> Tomentose(x))\nforall x (Unpowered(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) and Cragfast(x) -> Unpowered(x))\n\nFortuitous(alana)\n\nBimonthly(alana) and Cragfast(alana) and forall x (Bimonthly(x) and Cragfast(x) -> Unpowered(x)) -> therefore Unpowered(alana) Unpowered(alana) and forall x (Unpowered(x) -> Fortuitous(x)) -> therefore Fortuitous(alana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Goober is egoistical. Goober is mucous. Goober is footed. Goober is unsolvable. Laurella is lamarckian. Laurella is sexy. Cody is egoistical. Cody is sexy. Cody is mucous. Cody is unsolvable. If something is unsolvable then it is footed. All sapphic things are unsolvable. Kind, lamarckian things are sapphic. Laurella is not unsolvable.", "logic": "\nEgoistical(goober)\nMucous(goober)\nFooted(goober)\nUnsolvable(goober)\nLamarckian(laurella)\nSexy(laurella)\nEgoistical(cody)\nSexy(cody)\nMucous(cody)\nUnsolvable(cody)\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) -> Footed(x))\nforall x (Sapphic(x) -> Unsolvable(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) and Lamarckian(x) -> Sapphic(x))\n\nnot Unsolvable(laurella)\n\nSexy(laurella) and Lamarckian(laurella) and forall x (Sexy(x) and Lamarckian(x) -> Sapphic(x)) -> therefore Sapphic(laurella) Sapphic(laurella) and forall x (Sapphic(x) -> Unsolvable(x)) -> therefore Unsolvable(laurella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Henry is apish. Henry is damning. Henry is korean. Henry is measured. Pamella is immature. Pamella is monoicous. Heywood is apish. Heywood is monoicous. Heywood is damning. Heywood is measured. If something is measured then it is korean. All hatless things are measured. Kind, immature things are hatless. Pamella is korean.", "logic": "\nApish(henry)\nDamning(henry)\nKorean(henry)\nMeasured(henry)\nImmature(pamella)\nMonoicous(pamella)\nApish(heywood)\nMonoicous(heywood)\nDamning(heywood)\nMeasured(heywood)\nforall x (Measured(x) -> Korean(x))\nforall x (Hatless(x) -> Measured(x))\nforall x (Monoicous(x) and Immature(x) -> Hatless(x))\n\nKorean(pamella)\n\nMonoicous(pamella) and Immature(pamella) and forall x (Monoicous(x) and Immature(x) -> Hatless(x)) -> therefore Hatless(pamella) Hatless(pamella) and forall x (Hatless(x) -> Measured(x)) -> therefore Measured(pamella) Measured(pamella) and forall x (Measured(x) -> Korean(x)) -> therefore Korean(pamella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Guthrie is impaired. Guthrie is antiguan. Guthrie is anguillan. Guthrie is indistinct. Marybelle is paradisal. Marybelle is stranded. Andee is impaired. Andee is stranded. Andee is antiguan. Andee is indistinct. If something is indistinct then it is anguillan. All besotted things are indistinct. Kind, paradisal things are besotted. Marybelle is not anguillan.", "logic": "\nImpaired(guthrie)\nAntiguan(guthrie)\nAnguillan(guthrie)\nIndistinct(guthrie)\nParadisal(marybelle)\nStranded(marybelle)\nImpaired(andee)\nStranded(andee)\nAntiguan(andee)\nIndistinct(andee)\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> Anguillan(x))\nforall x (Besotted(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nforall x (Stranded(x) and Paradisal(x) -> Besotted(x))\n\nnot Anguillan(marybelle)\n\nStranded(marybelle) and Paradisal(marybelle) and forall x (Stranded(x) and Paradisal(x) -> Besotted(x)) -> therefore Besotted(marybelle) Besotted(marybelle) and forall x (Besotted(x) -> Indistinct(x)) -> therefore Indistinct(marybelle) Indistinct(marybelle) and forall x (Indistinct(x) -> Anguillan(x)) -> therefore Anguillan(marybelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Ilyse is blackened. Ilyse is nosy. Ilyse is branchy. Ilyse is ciliated. Wenonah is unended. Wenonah is lincolnian. Holli is blackened. Holli is lincolnian. Holli is nosy. Holli is ciliated. If something is ciliated then it is branchy. All eritrean things are ciliated. Kind, unended things are eritrean. Ilyse is not eritrean.", "logic": "\nBlackened(ilyse)\nNosy(ilyse)\nBranchy(ilyse)\nCiliated(ilyse)\nUnended(wenonah)\nLincolnian(wenonah)\nBlackened(holli)\nLincolnian(holli)\nNosy(holli)\nCiliated(holli)\nforall x (Ciliated(x) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Eritrean(x) -> Ciliated(x))\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) and Unended(x) -> Eritrean(x))\n\nnot Eritrean(ilyse)\n\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) and Unended(x) -> Eritrean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Tricia is flustered. Tricia is taurine. Tricia is latter. Tricia is lengthened. Stanwood is blithesome. Stanwood is pituitary. Kostas is flustered. Kostas is pituitary. Kostas is taurine. Kostas is lengthened. If something is lengthened then it is latter. All ruttish things are lengthened. Kind, blithesome things are ruttish. Kostas is ruttish.", "logic": "\nFlustered(tricia)\nTaurine(tricia)\nLatter(tricia)\nLengthened(tricia)\nBlithesome(stanwood)\nPituitary(stanwood)\nFlustered(kostas)\nPituitary(kostas)\nTaurine(kostas)\nLengthened(kostas)\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Ruttish(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Blithesome(x) -> Ruttish(x))\n\nRuttish(kostas)\n\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Blithesome(x) -> Ruttish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Christi is monogamous. Christi is unlicensed. Christi is engaging. Christi is beefy. Lawerence is ambulatory. Lawerence is anticancer. Orin is monogamous. Orin is anticancer. Orin is unlicensed. Orin is beefy. If something is beefy then it is engaging. All clxx things are beefy. Kind, ambulatory things are clxx. Orin is not ambulatory.", "logic": "\nMonogamous(christi)\nUnlicensed(christi)\nEngaging(christi)\nBeefy(christi)\nAmbulatory(lawerence)\nAnticancer(lawerence)\nMonogamous(orin)\nAnticancer(orin)\nUnlicensed(orin)\nBeefy(orin)\nforall x (Beefy(x) -> Engaging(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Beefy(x))\nforall x (Anticancer(x) and Ambulatory(x) -> Clxx(x))\n\nnot Ambulatory(orin)\n\nnot Ambulatory(orin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Farrand is anamorphic. Farrand is shelflike. Farrand is polyoicous. Farrand is hypoactive. Mahmoud is damaging. Mahmoud is observable. Cecile is anamorphic. Cecile is observable. Cecile is shelflike. Cecile is hypoactive. If something is hypoactive then it is polyoicous. All blistery things are hypoactive. Kind, damaging things are blistery. Farrand is observable.", "logic": "\nAnamorphic(farrand)\nShelflike(farrand)\nPolyoicous(farrand)\nHypoactive(farrand)\nDamaging(mahmoud)\nObservable(mahmoud)\nAnamorphic(cecile)\nObservable(cecile)\nShelflike(cecile)\nHypoactive(cecile)\nforall x (Hypoactive(x) -> Polyoicous(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Observable(x) and Damaging(x) -> Blistery(x))\n\nObservable(farrand)\n\nObservable(farrand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Georges is seeded. Georges is metatarsal. Georges is unnerved. Georges is adagio. Belle is isomeric. Belle is tiddly. Beale is seeded. Beale is tiddly. Beale is metatarsal. Beale is adagio. If something is adagio then it is unnerved. All ritardando things are adagio. Kind, isomeric things are ritardando. Belle is not seeded.", "logic": "\nSeeded(georges)\nMetatarsal(georges)\nUnnerved(georges)\nAdagio(georges)\nIsomeric(belle)\nTiddly(belle)\nSeeded(beale)\nTiddly(beale)\nMetatarsal(beale)\nAdagio(beale)\nforall x (Adagio(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Ritardando(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Tiddly(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Ritardando(x))\n\nnot Seeded(belle)\n\nnot Seeded(belle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Jewelle is famished. Jewelle is kayoed. Jewelle is epicyclic. Jewelle is exuberant. Terrill is measured. Terrill is thirtieth. Minta is famished. Minta is thirtieth. Minta is kayoed. Minta is exuberant. If something is exuberant then it is epicyclic. All uninominal things are exuberant. Kind, measured things are uninominal. Jewelle is measured.", "logic": "\nFamished(jewelle)\nKayoed(jewelle)\nEpicyclic(jewelle)\nExuberant(jewelle)\nMeasured(terrill)\nThirtieth(terrill)\nFamished(minta)\nThirtieth(minta)\nKayoed(minta)\nExuberant(minta)\nforall x (Exuberant(x) -> Epicyclic(x))\nforall x (Uninominal(x) -> Exuberant(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Measured(x) -> Uninominal(x))\n\nMeasured(jewelle)\n\nMeasured(jewelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1324"} {"premises": "Willette is forbidden. Willette is diverting. Willette is carpal. Willette is semiliquid. Rawley is ectozoan. Rawley is squalid. Rawley is abundant. Rawley is carpal. Rawley is semiliquid. Samuel is ectozoan. Samuel is abundant. Samuel is semiliquid. Tatum is forbidden. Tatum is diverting. Tatum is carpal. All squalid people are abundant. Smart, diverting people are squalid. All forbidden people are semiliquid. Tatum is diverting.", "logic": "\nForbidden(willette)\nDiverting(willette)\nCarpal(willette)\nSemiliquid(willette)\nEctozoan(rawley)\nSqualid(rawley)\nAbundant(rawley)\nCarpal(rawley)\nSemiliquid(rawley)\nEctozoan(samuel)\nAbundant(samuel)\nSemiliquid(samuel)\nForbidden(tatum)\nDiverting(tatum)\nCarpal(tatum)\nforall x (Squalid(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Diverting(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Forbidden(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\n\nDiverting(tatum)\n\ntherefore Diverting(tatum)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Amalie is antiseptic. Amalie is crude. Amalie is unflagging. Amalie is punished. Shela is kayoed. Shela is pedantic. Shela is muscular. Shela is unflagging. Shela is punished. Annadiana is kayoed. Annadiana is muscular. Annadiana is punished. Frederica is antiseptic. Frederica is crude. Frederica is unflagging. All pedantic people are muscular. Smart, crude people are pedantic. All antiseptic people are punished. Annadiana is not kayoed.", "logic": "\nAntiseptic(amalie)\nCrude(amalie)\nUnflagging(amalie)\nPunished(amalie)\nKayoed(shela)\nPedantic(shela)\nMuscular(shela)\nUnflagging(shela)\nPunished(shela)\nKayoed(annadiana)\nMuscular(annadiana)\nPunished(annadiana)\nAntiseptic(frederica)\nCrude(frederica)\nUnflagging(frederica)\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Muscular(x))\nforall x (Punished(x) and Crude(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) -> Punished(x))\n\nnot Kayoed(annadiana)\n\ntherefore Kayoed(annadiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Rodd is overactive. Rodd is taxonomic. Rodd is chiliastic. Rodd is alary. Jonny is suspicious. Jonny is isogonic. Jonny is dappled. Jonny is chiliastic. Jonny is alary. Stoddard is suspicious. Stoddard is dappled. Stoddard is alary. Constance is overactive. Constance is taxonomic. Constance is chiliastic. All isogonic people are dappled. Smart, taxonomic people are isogonic. All overactive people are alary. Constance is alary.", "logic": "\nOveractive(rodd)\nTaxonomic(rodd)\nChiliastic(rodd)\nAlary(rodd)\nSuspicious(jonny)\nIsogonic(jonny)\nDappled(jonny)\nChiliastic(jonny)\nAlary(jonny)\nSuspicious(stoddard)\nDappled(stoddard)\nAlary(stoddard)\nOveractive(constance)\nTaxonomic(constance)\nChiliastic(constance)\nforall x (Isogonic(x) -> Dappled(x))\nforall x (Alary(x) and Taxonomic(x) -> Isogonic(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Alary(x))\n\nAlary(constance)\n\nOveractive(constance) and forall x (Overactive(x) -> Alary(x)) -> therefore Alary(constance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Thorpe is sovereign. Thorpe is dustlike. Thorpe is blockaded. Thorpe is attendant. Ethan is protanopic. Ethan is deft. Ethan is heroical. Ethan is blockaded. Ethan is attendant. Marietta is protanopic. Marietta is heroical. Marietta is attendant. Marty is sovereign. Marty is dustlike. Marty is blockaded. All deft people are heroical. Smart, dustlike people are deft. All sovereign people are attendant. Thorpe is not deft.", "logic": "\nSovereign(thorpe)\nDustlike(thorpe)\nBlockaded(thorpe)\nAttendant(thorpe)\nProtanopic(ethan)\nDeft(ethan)\nHeroical(ethan)\nBlockaded(ethan)\nAttendant(ethan)\nProtanopic(marietta)\nHeroical(marietta)\nAttendant(marietta)\nSovereign(marty)\nDustlike(marty)\nBlockaded(marty)\nforall x (Deft(x) -> Heroical(x))\nforall x (Attendant(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) -> Attendant(x))\n\nnot Deft(thorpe)\n\nAttendant(thorpe) and Dustlike(thorpe) and forall x (Attendant(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Deft(x)) -> therefore Deft(thorpe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Alton is adventive. Alton is guiltless. Alton is painted. Alton is considered. Peggy is winey. Peggy is capsulate. Peggy is sitting. Peggy is painted. Peggy is considered. Benny is winey. Benny is sitting. Benny is considered. Nessy is adventive. Nessy is guiltless. Nessy is painted. All capsulate people are sitting. Smart, guiltless people are capsulate. All adventive people are considered. Alton is sitting.", "logic": "\nAdventive(alton)\nGuiltless(alton)\nPainted(alton)\nConsidered(alton)\nWiney(peggy)\nCapsulate(peggy)\nSitting(peggy)\nPainted(peggy)\nConsidered(peggy)\nWiney(benny)\nSitting(benny)\nConsidered(benny)\nAdventive(nessy)\nGuiltless(nessy)\nPainted(nessy)\nforall x (Capsulate(x) -> Sitting(x))\nforall x (Considered(x) and Guiltless(x) -> Capsulate(x))\nforall x (Adventive(x) -> Considered(x))\n\nSitting(alton)\n\nConsidered(alton) and Guiltless(alton) and forall x (Considered(x) and Guiltless(x) -> Capsulate(x)) -> therefore Capsulate(alton) Capsulate(alton) and forall x (Capsulate(x) -> Sitting(x)) -> therefore Sitting(alton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Lulu is diachronic. Lulu is diminished. Lulu is grandiose. Lulu is sugarless. Jed is beardown. Jed is neuter. Jed is mangey. Jed is grandiose. Jed is sugarless. Noelle is beardown. Noelle is mangey. Noelle is sugarless. Hedy is diachronic. Hedy is diminished. Hedy is grandiose. All neuter people are mangey. Smart, diminished people are neuter. All diachronic people are sugarless. Lulu is not mangey.", "logic": "\nDiachronic(lulu)\nDiminished(lulu)\nGrandiose(lulu)\nSugarless(lulu)\nBeardown(jed)\nNeuter(jed)\nMangey(jed)\nGrandiose(jed)\nSugarless(jed)\nBeardown(noelle)\nMangey(noelle)\nSugarless(noelle)\nDiachronic(hedy)\nDiminished(hedy)\nGrandiose(hedy)\nforall x (Neuter(x) -> Mangey(x))\nforall x (Sugarless(x) and Diminished(x) -> Neuter(x))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) -> Sugarless(x))\n\nnot Mangey(lulu)\n\nSugarless(lulu) and Diminished(lulu) and forall x (Sugarless(x) and Diminished(x) -> Neuter(x)) -> therefore Neuter(lulu) Neuter(lulu) and forall x (Neuter(x) -> Mangey(x)) -> therefore Mangey(lulu)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Rhianna is repentant. Rhianna is purulent. Rhianna is absorbed. Rhianna is bespoke. Harley is eritrean. Harley is accented. Harley is meningeal. Harley is absorbed. Harley is bespoke. Jeffry is eritrean. Jeffry is meningeal. Jeffry is bespoke. Audre is repentant. Audre is purulent. Audre is absorbed. All accented people are meningeal. Smart, purulent people are accented. All repentant people are bespoke. Audre is meningeal.", "logic": "\nRepentant(rhianna)\nPurulent(rhianna)\nAbsorbed(rhianna)\nBespoke(rhianna)\nEritrean(harley)\nAccented(harley)\nMeningeal(harley)\nAbsorbed(harley)\nBespoke(harley)\nEritrean(jeffry)\nMeningeal(jeffry)\nBespoke(jeffry)\nRepentant(audre)\nPurulent(audre)\nAbsorbed(audre)\nforall x (Accented(x) -> Meningeal(x))\nforall x (Bespoke(x) and Purulent(x) -> Accented(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> Bespoke(x))\n\nMeningeal(audre)\n\nRepentant(audre) and forall x (Repentant(x) -> Bespoke(x)) -> therefore Bespoke(audre) Bespoke(audre) and Purulent(audre) and forall x (Bespoke(x) and Purulent(x) -> Accented(x)) -> therefore Accented(audre) Accented(audre) and forall x (Accented(x) -> Meningeal(x)) -> therefore Meningeal(audre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Mariette is creative. Mariette is bombproof. Mariette is blackish. Mariette is deltoid. Sybilla is growing. Sybilla is bulimic. Sybilla is regardant. Sybilla is blackish. Sybilla is deltoid. Milli is growing. Milli is regardant. Milli is deltoid. Wylie is creative. Wylie is bombproof. Wylie is blackish. All bulimic people are regardant. Smart, bombproof people are bulimic. All creative people are deltoid. Wylie is not regardant.", "logic": "\nCreative(mariette)\nBombproof(mariette)\nBlackish(mariette)\nDeltoid(mariette)\nGrowing(sybilla)\nBulimic(sybilla)\nRegardant(sybilla)\nBlackish(sybilla)\nDeltoid(sybilla)\nGrowing(milli)\nRegardant(milli)\nDeltoid(milli)\nCreative(wylie)\nBombproof(wylie)\nBlackish(wylie)\nforall x (Bulimic(x) -> Regardant(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) and Bombproof(x) -> Bulimic(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) -> Deltoid(x))\n\nnot Regardant(wylie)\n\nCreative(wylie) and forall x (Creative(x) -> Deltoid(x)) -> therefore Deltoid(wylie) Deltoid(wylie) and Bombproof(wylie) and forall x (Deltoid(x) and Bombproof(x) -> Bulimic(x)) -> therefore Bulimic(wylie) Bulimic(wylie) and forall x (Bulimic(x) -> Regardant(x)) -> therefore Regardant(wylie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Lonna is zygotic. Lonna is reliant. Lonna is slubbed. Lonna is gibelike. Ulrica is footloose. Ulrica is midget. Ulrica is tetragonal. Ulrica is slubbed. Ulrica is gibelike. Micah is footloose. Micah is tetragonal. Micah is gibelike. Grissel is zygotic. Grissel is reliant. Grissel is slubbed. All midget people are tetragonal. Smart, reliant people are midget. All zygotic people are gibelike. Micah is not midget.", "logic": "\nZygotic(lonna)\nReliant(lonna)\nSlubbed(lonna)\nGibelike(lonna)\nFootloose(ulrica)\nMidget(ulrica)\nTetragonal(ulrica)\nSlubbed(ulrica)\nGibelike(ulrica)\nFootloose(micah)\nTetragonal(micah)\nGibelike(micah)\nZygotic(grissel)\nReliant(grissel)\nSlubbed(grissel)\nforall x (Midget(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Gibelike(x) and Reliant(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) -> Gibelike(x))\n\nnot Midget(micah)\n\nforall x (Gibelike(x) and Reliant(x) -> Midget(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Ericha is levantine. Ericha is scandalous. Ericha is settled. Ericha is noisome. Merell is imposing. Merell is cellulosid. Merell is senescent. Merell is settled. Merell is noisome. Alidia is imposing. Alidia is senescent. Alidia is noisome. Krystal is levantine. Krystal is scandalous. Krystal is settled. All cellulosid people are senescent. Smart, scandalous people are cellulosid. All levantine people are noisome. Alidia is settled.", "logic": "\nLevantine(ericha)\nScandalous(ericha)\nSettled(ericha)\nNoisome(ericha)\nImposing(merell)\nCellulosid(merell)\nSenescent(merell)\nSettled(merell)\nNoisome(merell)\nImposing(alidia)\nSenescent(alidia)\nNoisome(alidia)\nLevantine(krystal)\nScandalous(krystal)\nSettled(krystal)\nforall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Noisome(x) and Scandalous(x) -> Cellulosid(x))\nforall x (Levantine(x) -> Noisome(x))\n\nSettled(alidia)\n\nSettled(alidia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Nicola is surplus. Nicola is unresolved. Nicola is carboxyl. Nicola is softening. Shalna is swollen. Shalna is regulation. Shalna is myotic. Shalna is carboxyl. Shalna is softening. Heloise is swollen. Heloise is myotic. Heloise is softening. Lishe is surplus. Lishe is unresolved. Lishe is carboxyl. All regulation people are myotic. Smart, unresolved people are regulation. All surplus people are softening. Heloise is not unresolved.", "logic": "\nSurplus(nicola)\nUnresolved(nicola)\nCarboxyl(nicola)\nSoftening(nicola)\nSwollen(shalna)\nRegulation(shalna)\nMyotic(shalna)\nCarboxyl(shalna)\nSoftening(shalna)\nSwollen(heloise)\nMyotic(heloise)\nSoftening(heloise)\nSurplus(lishe)\nUnresolved(lishe)\nCarboxyl(lishe)\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> Myotic(x))\nforall x (Softening(x) and Unresolved(x) -> Regulation(x))\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Softening(x))\n\nnot Unresolved(heloise)\n\nnot Unresolved(heloise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Gussi is plucked. Gussi is hortatory. Gussi is egregious. Gussi is damaging. Ashlen is variable. Ashlen is ecological. Ashlen is bonzer. Ashlen is egregious. Ashlen is damaging. Salomone is variable. Salomone is bonzer. Salomone is damaging. Hailey is plucked. Hailey is hortatory. Hailey is egregious. All ecological people are bonzer. Smart, hortatory people are ecological. All plucked people are damaging. Ashlen is hortatory.", "logic": "\nPlucked(gussi)\nHortatory(gussi)\nEgregious(gussi)\nDamaging(gussi)\nVariable(ashlen)\nEcological(ashlen)\nBonzer(ashlen)\nEgregious(ashlen)\nDamaging(ashlen)\nVariable(salomone)\nBonzer(salomone)\nDamaging(salomone)\nPlucked(hailey)\nHortatory(hailey)\nEgregious(hailey)\nforall x (Ecological(x) -> Bonzer(x))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and Hortatory(x) -> Ecological(x))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Damaging(x))\n\nHortatory(ashlen)\n\nHortatory(ashlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Everard is stainless. Everard is cognitive. Everard is motile. Everard is liquescent. Sinclair is airworthy. Sinclair is blanched. Sinclair is luteal. Sinclair is motile. Sinclair is liquescent. Beale is airworthy. Beale is luteal. Beale is liquescent. Ernesto is stainless. Ernesto is cognitive. Ernesto is motile. All blanched people are luteal. Smart, cognitive people are blanched. All stainless people are liquescent. Ernesto is not airworthy.", "logic": "\nStainless(everard)\nCognitive(everard)\nMotile(everard)\nLiquescent(everard)\nAirworthy(sinclair)\nBlanched(sinclair)\nLuteal(sinclair)\nMotile(sinclair)\nLiquescent(sinclair)\nAirworthy(beale)\nLuteal(beale)\nLiquescent(beale)\nStainless(ernesto)\nCognitive(ernesto)\nMotile(ernesto)\nforall x (Blanched(x) -> Luteal(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) and Cognitive(x) -> Blanched(x))\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Liquescent(x))\n\nnot Airworthy(ernesto)\n\nnot Airworthy(ernesto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Nola is disparate. Nola is unquiet. Nola is fusiform. Nola is bookish. Natala is supple. Natala is vaulting. Natala is deluxe. Natala is fusiform. Natala is bookish. Quintina is supple. Quintina is deluxe. Quintina is bookish. Jacki is disparate. Jacki is unquiet. Jacki is fusiform. All vaulting people are deluxe. Smart, unquiet people are vaulting. All disparate people are bookish. Quintina is disparate.", "logic": "\nDisparate(nola)\nUnquiet(nola)\nFusiform(nola)\nBookish(nola)\nSupple(natala)\nVaulting(natala)\nDeluxe(natala)\nFusiform(natala)\nBookish(natala)\nSupple(quintina)\nDeluxe(quintina)\nBookish(quintina)\nDisparate(jacki)\nUnquiet(jacki)\nFusiform(jacki)\nforall x (Vaulting(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) and Unquiet(x) -> Vaulting(x))\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Bookish(x))\n\nDisparate(quintina)\n\nDisparate(quintina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Randell is undreamt. Randell is phonetic. Randell is gooey. Randell is shattered. Moyra is inchoate. Moyra is slippered. Moyra is plumed. Moyra is gooey. Moyra is shattered. Eryn is inchoate. Eryn is plumed. Eryn is shattered. Merilyn is undreamt. Merilyn is phonetic. Merilyn is gooey. All slippered people are plumed. Smart, phonetic people are slippered. All undreamt people are shattered. Moyra is not undreamt.", "logic": "\nUndreamt(randell)\nPhonetic(randell)\nGooey(randell)\nShattered(randell)\nInchoate(moyra)\nSlippered(moyra)\nPlumed(moyra)\nGooey(moyra)\nShattered(moyra)\nInchoate(eryn)\nPlumed(eryn)\nShattered(eryn)\nUndreamt(merilyn)\nPhonetic(merilyn)\nGooey(merilyn)\nforall x (Slippered(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Phonetic(x) -> Slippered(x))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Shattered(x))\n\nnot Undreamt(moyra)\n\nnot Undreamt(moyra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Morgen is excited. Morgen is supreme. Morgen is hackneyed. Morgen is trite. Lonnie is amuck. Lonnie is belittled. Lonnie is nonwoody. Lonnie is hackneyed. Lonnie is trite. Marit is amuck. Marit is nonwoody. Marit is trite. Julian is excited. Julian is supreme. Julian is hackneyed. All belittled people are nonwoody. Smart, supreme people are belittled. All excited people are trite. Morgen is amuck.", "logic": "\nExcited(morgen)\nSupreme(morgen)\nHackneyed(morgen)\nTrite(morgen)\nAmuck(lonnie)\nBelittled(lonnie)\nNonwoody(lonnie)\nHackneyed(lonnie)\nTrite(lonnie)\nAmuck(marit)\nNonwoody(marit)\nTrite(marit)\nExcited(julian)\nSupreme(julian)\nHackneyed(julian)\nforall x (Belittled(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\nforall x (Trite(x) and Supreme(x) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Excited(x) -> Trite(x))\n\nAmuck(morgen)\n\nAmuck(morgen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-407"} {"premises": "Cal is inimical. Vassili is inimical. Loreen is achromous. Fanchon is unredeemed. All achromous, spooky things are inimical. All hesitant things are chapfallen. All spooky things are chapfallen. All unredeemed things are hesitant. Smart, unredeemed things are hesitant. Green, chapfallen things are achromous. If Loreen is hesitant and Loreen is spooky then Loreen is chapfallen. If something is spooky and achromous then it is unredeemed. Fanchon is unredeemed.", "logic": "\nInimical(cal)\nInimical(vassili)\nAchromous(loreen)\nUnredeemed(fanchon)\nforall x (Achromous(x) and Spooky(x) -> Inimical(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\nforall x (Spooky(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Hesitant(x))\nforall x (Achromous(x) and Unredeemed(x) -> Hesitant(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Chapfallen(x) -> Achromous(x))\nHesitant(loreen) and Spooky(loreen) -> Chapfallen(loreen)\nforall x (Spooky(x) and Achromous(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\n\nUnredeemed(fanchon)\n\ntherefore Unredeemed(fanchon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Oriana is sterilised. Linea is sterilised. Nada is antitumour. Faith is heritable. All antitumour, fruiting things are sterilised. All delayed things are bubbly. All fruiting things are bubbly. All heritable things are delayed. Smart, heritable things are delayed. Green, bubbly things are antitumour. If Nada is delayed and Nada is fruiting then Nada is bubbly. If something is fruiting and antitumour then it is heritable. Oriana is not sterilised.", "logic": "\nSterilised(oriana)\nSterilised(linea)\nAntitumour(nada)\nHeritable(faith)\nforall x (Antitumour(x) and Fruiting(x) -> Sterilised(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) -> Bubbly(x))\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> Bubbly(x))\nforall x (Heritable(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) and Heritable(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) and Bubbly(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nDelayed(nada) and Fruiting(nada) -> Bubbly(nada)\nforall x (Fruiting(x) and Antitumour(x) -> Heritable(x))\n\nnot Sterilised(oriana)\n\ntherefore Sterilised(oriana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Fergus is fattening. Gavriel is fattening. Raina is pediatric. Ardeen is unloved. All pediatric, orchestral things are fattening. All placeable things are stainable. All orchestral things are stainable. All unloved things are placeable. Smart, unloved things are placeable. Green, stainable things are pediatric. If Raina is placeable and Raina is orchestral then Raina is stainable. If something is orchestral and pediatric then it is unloved. Ardeen is placeable.", "logic": "\nFattening(fergus)\nFattening(gavriel)\nPediatric(raina)\nUnloved(ardeen)\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and Orchestral(x) -> Fattening(x))\nforall x (Placeable(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Unloved(x) -> Placeable(x))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and Unloved(x) -> Placeable(x))\nforall x (Placeable(x) and Stainable(x) -> Pediatric(x))\nPlaceable(raina) and Orchestral(raina) -> Stainable(raina)\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and Pediatric(x) -> Unloved(x))\n\nPlaceable(ardeen)\n\nUnloved(ardeen) and forall x (Unloved(x) -> Placeable(x)) -> therefore Placeable(ardeen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Victor is draining. Rebekah is draining. Fraser is scopal. Wilek is increased. All scopal, weakened things are draining. All clonal things are classy. All weakened things are classy. All increased things are clonal. Smart, increased things are clonal. Green, classy things are scopal. If Fraser is clonal and Fraser is weakened then Fraser is classy. If something is weakened and scopal then it is increased. Wilek is not clonal.", "logic": "\nDraining(victor)\nDraining(rebekah)\nScopal(fraser)\nIncreased(wilek)\nforall x (Scopal(x) and Weakened(x) -> Draining(x))\nforall x (Clonal(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Weakened(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Increased(x) -> Clonal(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) and Increased(x) -> Clonal(x))\nforall x (Clonal(x) and Classy(x) -> Scopal(x))\nClonal(fraser) and Weakened(fraser) -> Classy(fraser)\nforall x (Weakened(x) and Scopal(x) -> Increased(x))\n\nnot Clonal(wilek)\n\nIncreased(wilek) and forall x (Increased(x) -> Clonal(x)) -> therefore Clonal(wilek)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Alis is befuddled. Ruperto is befuddled. Brandy is sulphurous. Linea is continuant. All sulphurous, unflavored things are befuddled. All eutherian things are meet. All unflavored things are meet. All continuant things are eutherian. Smart, continuant things are eutherian. Green, meet things are sulphurous. If Brandy is eutherian and Brandy is unflavored then Brandy is meet. If something is unflavored and sulphurous then it is continuant. Linea is meet.", "logic": "\nBefuddled(alis)\nBefuddled(ruperto)\nSulphurous(brandy)\nContinuant(linea)\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Befuddled(x))\nforall x (Eutherian(x) -> Meet(x))\nforall x (Unflavored(x) -> Meet(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Eutherian(x))\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) and Continuant(x) -> Eutherian(x))\nforall x (Eutherian(x) and Meet(x) -> Sulphurous(x))\nEutherian(brandy) and Unflavored(brandy) -> Meet(brandy)\nforall x (Unflavored(x) and Sulphurous(x) -> Continuant(x))\n\nMeet(linea)\n\nContinuant(linea) and forall x (Continuant(x) -> Eutherian(x)) -> therefore Eutherian(linea) Eutherian(linea) and forall x (Eutherian(x) -> Meet(x)) -> therefore Meet(linea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Joann is trusting. Broddy is trusting. Jerald is tops. Noellyn is eastbound. All tops, xeric things are trusting. All jinxed things are buff. All xeric things are buff. All eastbound things are jinxed. Smart, eastbound things are jinxed. Green, buff things are tops. If Jerald is jinxed and Jerald is xeric then Jerald is buff. If something is xeric and tops then it is eastbound. Noellyn is not buff.", "logic": "\nTrusting(joann)\nTrusting(broddy)\nTops(jerald)\nEastbound(noellyn)\nforall x (Tops(x) and Xeric(x) -> Trusting(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) -> Buff(x))\nforall x (Xeric(x) -> Buff(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Tops(x) and Eastbound(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Jinxed(x) and Buff(x) -> Tops(x))\nJinxed(jerald) and Xeric(jerald) -> Buff(jerald)\nforall x (Xeric(x) and Tops(x) -> Eastbound(x))\n\nnot Buff(noellyn)\n\nEastbound(noellyn) and forall x (Eastbound(x) -> Jinxed(x)) -> therefore Jinxed(noellyn) Jinxed(noellyn) and forall x (Jinxed(x) -> Buff(x)) -> therefore Buff(noellyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Row is georgian. Boyce is georgian. Shoshie is cattish. Sisile is fabled. All cattish, corpulent things are georgian. All away things are talentless. All corpulent things are talentless. All fabled things are away. Smart, fabled things are away. Green, talentless things are cattish. If Shoshie is away and Shoshie is corpulent then Shoshie is talentless. If something is corpulent and cattish then it is fabled. Sisile is cattish.", "logic": "\nGeorgian(row)\nGeorgian(boyce)\nCattish(shoshie)\nFabled(sisile)\nforall x (Cattish(x) and Corpulent(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Away(x) -> Talentless(x))\nforall x (Corpulent(x) -> Talentless(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) -> Away(x))\nforall x (Cattish(x) and Fabled(x) -> Away(x))\nforall x (Away(x) and Talentless(x) -> Cattish(x))\nAway(shoshie) and Corpulent(shoshie) -> Talentless(shoshie)\nforall x (Corpulent(x) and Cattish(x) -> Fabled(x))\n\nCattish(sisile)\n\nFabled(sisile) and forall x (Fabled(x) -> Away(x)) -> therefore Away(sisile) Fabled(sisile) and forall x (Fabled(x) -> Away(x)) -> therefore Away(sisile) Away(sisile) and forall x (Away(x) -> Talentless(x)) -> therefore Talentless(sisile) Away(sisile) and Talentless(sisile) and forall x (Away(x) and Talentless(x) -> Cattish(x)) -> therefore Cattish(sisile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Hadria is hyaline. Kaster is hyaline. Ciel is outrageous. Clemence is rotatory. All outrageous, indecisive things are hyaline. All blastular things are phyllodial. All indecisive things are phyllodial. All rotatory things are blastular. Smart, rotatory things are blastular. Green, phyllodial things are outrageous. If Ciel is blastular and Ciel is indecisive then Ciel is phyllodial. If something is indecisive and outrageous then it is rotatory. Clemence is not outrageous.", "logic": "\nHyaline(hadria)\nHyaline(kaster)\nOutrageous(ciel)\nRotatory(clemence)\nforall x (Outrageous(x) and Indecisive(x) -> Hyaline(x))\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Phyllodial(x))\nforall x (Indecisive(x) -> Phyllodial(x))\nforall x (Rotatory(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Outrageous(x) and Rotatory(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Blastular(x) and Phyllodial(x) -> Outrageous(x))\nBlastular(ciel) and Indecisive(ciel) -> Phyllodial(ciel)\nforall x (Indecisive(x) and Outrageous(x) -> Rotatory(x))\n\nnot Outrageous(clemence)\n\nRotatory(clemence) and forall x (Rotatory(x) -> Blastular(x)) -> therefore Blastular(clemence) Rotatory(clemence) and forall x (Rotatory(x) -> Blastular(x)) -> therefore Blastular(clemence) Blastular(clemence) and forall x (Blastular(x) -> Phyllodial(x)) -> therefore Phyllodial(clemence) Blastular(clemence) and Phyllodial(clemence) and forall x (Blastular(x) and Phyllodial(x) -> Outrageous(x)) -> therefore Outrageous(clemence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Rori is costless. Gustave is costless. Babita is applicable. Corry is plangent. All applicable, ginger things are costless. All tomboyish things are spinal. All ginger things are spinal. All plangent things are tomboyish. Smart, plangent things are tomboyish. Green, spinal things are applicable. If Babita is tomboyish and Babita is ginger then Babita is spinal. If something is ginger and applicable then it is plangent. Babita is not costless.", "logic": "\nCostless(rori)\nCostless(gustave)\nApplicable(babita)\nPlangent(corry)\nforall x (Applicable(x) and Ginger(x) -> Costless(x))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) -> Spinal(x))\nforall x (Ginger(x) -> Spinal(x))\nforall x (Plangent(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) and Plangent(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and Spinal(x) -> Applicable(x))\nTomboyish(babita) and Ginger(babita) -> Spinal(babita)\nforall x (Ginger(x) and Applicable(x) -> Plangent(x))\n\nnot Costless(babita)\n\nforall x (Applicable(x) and Ginger(x) -> Costless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Julie is undamaged. Kris is undamaged. Pris is bent. Gerty is tactual. All bent, endless things are undamaged. All disturbing things are terrific. All endless things are terrific. All tactual things are disturbing. Smart, tactual things are disturbing. Green, terrific things are bent. If Pris is disturbing and Pris is endless then Pris is terrific. If something is endless and bent then it is tactual. Pris is terrific.", "logic": "\nUndamaged(julie)\nUndamaged(kris)\nBent(pris)\nTactual(gerty)\nforall x (Bent(x) and Endless(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nforall x (Disturbing(x) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Endless(x) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Tactual(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Bent(x) and Tactual(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Disturbing(x) and Terrific(x) -> Bent(x))\nDisturbing(pris) and Endless(pris) -> Terrific(pris)\nforall x (Endless(x) and Bent(x) -> Tactual(x))\n\nTerrific(pris)\n\nforall x (Disturbing(x) -> Terrific(x)) <- forall x (Tactual(x) -> Disturbing(x)) <- forall x (Endless(x) and Bent(x) -> Tactual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Endora is bridgeable. Dyane is bridgeable. Jennine is instant. Spud is marine. All instant, ungummed things are bridgeable. All neotenic things are falling. All ungummed things are falling. All marine things are neotenic. Smart, marine things are neotenic. Green, falling things are instant. If Jennine is neotenic and Jennine is ungummed then Jennine is falling. If something is ungummed and instant then it is marine. Dyane is not instant.", "logic": "\nBridgeable(endora)\nBridgeable(dyane)\nInstant(jennine)\nMarine(spud)\nforall x (Instant(x) and Ungummed(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Falling(x))\nforall x (Ungummed(x) -> Falling(x))\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Instant(x) and Marine(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) and Falling(x) -> Instant(x))\nNeotenic(jennine) and Ungummed(jennine) -> Falling(jennine)\nforall x (Ungummed(x) and Instant(x) -> Marine(x))\n\nnot Instant(dyane)\n\nforall x (Neotenic(x) and Falling(x) -> Instant(x)) <- forall x (Marine(x) -> Neotenic(x)) <- forall x (Ungummed(x) and Instant(x) -> Marine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Izak is thousandth. Berkie is thousandth. Chloris is hominal. Damita is unpackaged. All hominal, muffled things are thousandth. All maniclike things are foliated. All muffled things are foliated. All unpackaged things are maniclike. Smart, unpackaged things are maniclike. Green, foliated things are hominal. If Chloris is maniclike and Chloris is muffled then Chloris is foliated. If something is muffled and hominal then it is unpackaged. Izak is hominal.", "logic": "\nThousandth(izak)\nThousandth(berkie)\nHominal(chloris)\nUnpackaged(damita)\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Muffled(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Maniclike(x) -> Foliated(x))\nforall x (Muffled(x) -> Foliated(x))\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) and Unpackaged(x) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Maniclike(x) and Foliated(x) -> Hominal(x))\nManiclike(chloris) and Muffled(chloris) -> Foliated(chloris)\nforall x (Muffled(x) and Hominal(x) -> Unpackaged(x))\n\nHominal(izak)\n\nforall x (Maniclike(x) and Foliated(x) -> Hominal(x)) <- forall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Maniclike(x)) <- forall x (Muffled(x) and Hominal(x) -> Unpackaged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Susie is penitent. Vernen is penitent. Silas is monkish. Eldon is purposeful. All monkish, blushful things are penitent. All rueful things are bewitched. All blushful things are bewitched. All purposeful things are rueful. Smart, purposeful things are rueful. Green, bewitched things are monkish. If Silas is rueful and Silas is blushful then Silas is bewitched. If something is blushful and monkish then it is purposeful. Eldon is not young.", "logic": "\nPenitent(susie)\nPenitent(vernen)\nMonkish(silas)\nPurposeful(eldon)\nforall x (Monkish(x) and Blushful(x) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Bewitched(x))\nforall x (Blushful(x) -> Bewitched(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Monkish(x) and Purposeful(x) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Rueful(x) and Bewitched(x) -> Monkish(x))\nRueful(silas) and Blushful(silas) -> Bewitched(silas)\nforall x (Blushful(x) and Monkish(x) -> Purposeful(x))\n\nnot Young(eldon)\n\nnot Young(eldon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Igor is frivolous. Diamond is frivolous. Arlyne is vaporized. Ruthanne is routine. All vaporized, apothecial things are frivolous. All reckless things are sedgelike. All apothecial things are sedgelike. All routine things are reckless. Smart, routine things are reckless. Green, sedgelike things are vaporized. If Arlyne is reckless and Arlyne is apothecial then Arlyne is sedgelike. If something is apothecial and vaporized then it is routine. Diamond is young.", "logic": "\nFrivolous(igor)\nFrivolous(diamond)\nVaporized(arlyne)\nRoutine(ruthanne)\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and Apothecial(x) -> Frivolous(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) -> Sedgelike(x))\nforall x (Apothecial(x) -> Sedgelike(x))\nforall x (Routine(x) -> Reckless(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and Routine(x) -> Reckless(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) and Sedgelike(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nReckless(arlyne) and Apothecial(arlyne) -> Sedgelike(arlyne)\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Vaporized(x) -> Routine(x))\n\nYoung(diamond)\n\nYoung(diamond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Tiff is gumptious. Vitia is gumptious. Sigfried is impish. Virginie is jaunty. All impish, unexpired things are gumptious. All saintly things are bilobed. All unexpired things are bilobed. All jaunty things are saintly. Smart, jaunty things are saintly. Green, bilobed things are impish. If Sigfried is saintly and Sigfried is unexpired then Sigfried is bilobed. If something is unexpired and impish then it is jaunty. Sigfried is not young.", "logic": "\nGumptious(tiff)\nGumptious(vitia)\nImpish(sigfried)\nJaunty(virginie)\nforall x (Impish(x) and Unexpired(x) -> Gumptious(x))\nforall x (Saintly(x) -> Bilobed(x))\nforall x (Unexpired(x) -> Bilobed(x))\nforall x (Jaunty(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Impish(x) and Jaunty(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Saintly(x) and Bilobed(x) -> Impish(x))\nSaintly(sigfried) and Unexpired(sigfried) -> Bilobed(sigfried)\nforall x (Unexpired(x) and Impish(x) -> Jaunty(x))\n\nnot Young(sigfried)\n\nnot Young(sigfried) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Karmen is defensible. Elyn is defensible. Milzie is deadlocked. Florri is regimented. All deadlocked, dominating things are defensible. All iron things are antennal. All dominating things are antennal. All regimented things are iron. Smart, regimented things are iron. Green, antennal things are deadlocked. If Milzie is iron and Milzie is dominating then Milzie is antennal. If something is dominating and deadlocked then it is regimented. Milzie is dominating.", "logic": "\nDefensible(karmen)\nDefensible(elyn)\nDeadlocked(milzie)\nRegimented(florri)\nforall x (Deadlocked(x) and Dominating(x) -> Defensible(x))\nforall x (Iron(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Iron(x))\nforall x (Deadlocked(x) and Regimented(x) -> Iron(x))\nforall x (Iron(x) and Antennal(x) -> Deadlocked(x))\nIron(milzie) and Dominating(milzie) -> Antennal(milzie)\nforall x (Dominating(x) and Deadlocked(x) -> Regimented(x))\n\nDominating(milzie)\n\nDominating(milzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-882"} {"premises": "Kendre is thunderous. Kendre is clubby. Kendre is insolent. Kirbee is clubby. Gertrudis is thunderous. Gertrudis is clubby. Gertrudis is cerebellar. If Kendre is not cerebellar then Kendre is insolent. All clubby people are annular. If Kirbee is wrought and Kirbee is annular then Kirbee is curricular. All curricular people are thunderous. Big people are curricular. If someone is annular and not insolent then they are curricular. Gertrudis is thunderous.", "logic": "\nThunderous(kendre)\nClubby(kendre)\nInsolent(kendre)\nClubby(kirbee)\nThunderous(gertrudis)\nClubby(gertrudis)\nCerebellar(gertrudis)\nnot Cerebellar(kendre) -> Insolent(kendre)\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> Annular(x))\nWrought(kirbee) and Annular(kirbee) -> Curricular(kirbee)\nforall x (Curricular(x) -> Thunderous(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) -> Curricular(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) and not Insolent(x) -> Curricular(x))\n\nThunderous(gertrudis)\n\ntherefore Thunderous(gertrudis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Dore is dolourous. Dore is canorous. Dore is caulked. Berry is canorous. Urban is dolourous. Urban is canorous. Urban is cobwebby. If Dore is not cobwebby then Dore is caulked. All canorous people are chafed. If Berry is current and Berry is chafed then Berry is valueless. All valueless people are dolourous. Big people are valueless. If someone is chafed and not caulked then they are valueless. Urban is not dolourous.", "logic": "\nDolourous(dore)\nCanorous(dore)\nCaulked(dore)\nCanorous(berry)\nDolourous(urban)\nCanorous(urban)\nCobwebby(urban)\nnot Cobwebby(dore) -> Caulked(dore)\nforall x (Canorous(x) -> Chafed(x))\nCurrent(berry) and Chafed(berry) -> Valueless(berry)\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> Dolourous(x))\nforall x (Chafed(x) -> Valueless(x))\nforall x (Chafed(x) and not Caulked(x) -> Valueless(x))\n\nnot Dolourous(urban)\n\ntherefore Dolourous(urban)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Paloma is swinish. Paloma is duple. Paloma is clean. Micky is duple. Fionna is swinish. Fionna is duple. Fionna is overfed. If Paloma is not overfed then Paloma is clean. All duple people are yeastlike. If Micky is sane and Micky is yeastlike then Micky is ciliary. All ciliary people are swinish. Big people are ciliary. If someone is yeastlike and not clean then they are ciliary. Fionna is yeastlike.", "logic": "\nSwinish(paloma)\nDuple(paloma)\nClean(paloma)\nDuple(micky)\nSwinish(fionna)\nDuple(fionna)\nOverfed(fionna)\nnot Overfed(paloma) -> Clean(paloma)\nforall x (Duple(x) -> Yeastlike(x))\nSane(micky) and Yeastlike(micky) -> Ciliary(micky)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Ciliary(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) and not Clean(x) -> Ciliary(x))\n\nYeastlike(fionna)\n\nDuple(fionna) and forall x (Duple(x) -> Yeastlike(x)) -> therefore Yeastlike(fionna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Bridie is defoliate. Bridie is leibnizian. Bridie is sentential. Marylou is leibnizian. Mahalia is defoliate. Mahalia is leibnizian. Mahalia is aroused. If Bridie is not aroused then Bridie is sentential. All leibnizian people are burdened. If Marylou is hominal and Marylou is burdened then Marylou is brownish. All brownish people are defoliate. Big people are brownish. If someone is burdened and not sentential then they are brownish. Mahalia is not burdened.", "logic": "\nDefoliate(bridie)\nLeibnizian(bridie)\nSentential(bridie)\nLeibnizian(marylou)\nDefoliate(mahalia)\nLeibnizian(mahalia)\nAroused(mahalia)\nnot Aroused(bridie) -> Sentential(bridie)\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) -> Burdened(x))\nHominal(marylou) and Burdened(marylou) -> Brownish(marylou)\nforall x (Brownish(x) -> Defoliate(x))\nforall x (Burdened(x) -> Brownish(x))\nforall x (Burdened(x) and not Sentential(x) -> Brownish(x))\n\nnot Burdened(mahalia)\n\nLeibnizian(mahalia) and forall x (Leibnizian(x) -> Burdened(x)) -> therefore Burdened(mahalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Davon is prevalent. Davon is allelic. Davon is olden. Corbin is allelic. Izzy is prevalent. Izzy is allelic. Izzy is manichee. If Davon is not manichee then Davon is olden. All allelic people are about. If Corbin is daunted and Corbin is about then Corbin is swagger. All swagger people are prevalent. Big people are swagger. If someone is about and not olden then they are swagger. Davon is swagger.", "logic": "\nPrevalent(davon)\nAllelic(davon)\nOlden(davon)\nAllelic(corbin)\nPrevalent(izzy)\nAllelic(izzy)\nManichee(izzy)\nnot Manichee(davon) -> Olden(davon)\nforall x (Allelic(x) -> About(x))\nDaunted(corbin) and About(corbin) -> Swagger(corbin)\nforall x (Swagger(x) -> Prevalent(x))\nforall x (About(x) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (About(x) and not Olden(x) -> Swagger(x))\n\nSwagger(davon)\n\nAllelic(davon) and forall x (Allelic(x) -> About(x)) -> therefore About(davon) About(davon) and forall x (About(x) -> Swagger(x)) -> therefore Swagger(davon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Bart is bullish. Bart is acritical. Bart is eldritch. Lucille is acritical. Marika is bullish. Marika is acritical. Marika is vivace. If Bart is not vivace then Bart is eldritch. All acritical people are shielded. If Lucille is nibbed and Lucille is shielded then Lucille is barbarous. All barbarous people are bullish. Big people are barbarous. If someone is shielded and not eldritch then they are barbarous. Marika is not barbarous.", "logic": "\nBullish(bart)\nAcritical(bart)\nEldritch(bart)\nAcritical(lucille)\nBullish(marika)\nAcritical(marika)\nVivace(marika)\nnot Vivace(bart) -> Eldritch(bart)\nforall x (Acritical(x) -> Shielded(x))\nNibbed(lucille) and Shielded(lucille) -> Barbarous(lucille)\nforall x (Barbarous(x) -> Bullish(x))\nforall x (Shielded(x) -> Barbarous(x))\nforall x (Shielded(x) and not Eldritch(x) -> Barbarous(x))\n\nnot Barbarous(marika)\n\nAcritical(marika) and forall x (Acritical(x) -> Shielded(x)) -> therefore Shielded(marika) Shielded(marika) and forall x (Shielded(x) -> Barbarous(x)) -> therefore Barbarous(marika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Cris is numberless. Cris is concordant. Cris is serous. Meyer is concordant. Annora is numberless. Annora is concordant. Annora is systematic. If Cris is not systematic then Cris is serous. All concordant people are leisurely. If Meyer is classy and Meyer is leisurely then Meyer is troubling. All troubling people are numberless. Big people are troubling. If someone is leisurely and not serous then they are troubling. Meyer is numberless.", "logic": "\nNumberless(cris)\nConcordant(cris)\nSerous(cris)\nConcordant(meyer)\nNumberless(annora)\nConcordant(annora)\nSystematic(annora)\nnot Systematic(cris) -> Serous(cris)\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Leisurely(x))\nClassy(meyer) and Leisurely(meyer) -> Troubling(meyer)\nforall x (Troubling(x) -> Numberless(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Troubling(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) and not Serous(x) -> Troubling(x))\n\nNumberless(meyer)\n\nConcordant(meyer) and forall x (Concordant(x) -> Leisurely(x)) -> therefore Leisurely(meyer) Leisurely(meyer) and forall x (Leisurely(x) -> Troubling(x)) -> therefore Troubling(meyer) Troubling(meyer) and forall x (Troubling(x) -> Numberless(x)) -> therefore Numberless(meyer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Lex is prophetic. Lex is crosswise. Lex is raspy. Joela is crosswise. Flore is prophetic. Flore is crosswise. Flore is allophonic. If Lex is not allophonic then Lex is raspy. All crosswise people are forgotten. If Joela is mesolithic and Joela is forgotten then Joela is cloggy. All cloggy people are prophetic. Big people are cloggy. If someone is forgotten and not raspy then they are cloggy. Joela is not prophetic.", "logic": "\nProphetic(lex)\nCrosswise(lex)\nRaspy(lex)\nCrosswise(joela)\nProphetic(flore)\nCrosswise(flore)\nAllophonic(flore)\nnot Allophonic(lex) -> Raspy(lex)\nforall x (Crosswise(x) -> Forgotten(x))\nMesolithic(joela) and Forgotten(joela) -> Cloggy(joela)\nforall x (Cloggy(x) -> Prophetic(x))\nforall x (Forgotten(x) -> Cloggy(x))\nforall x (Forgotten(x) and not Raspy(x) -> Cloggy(x))\n\nnot Prophetic(joela)\n\nCrosswise(joela) and forall x (Crosswise(x) -> Forgotten(x)) -> therefore Forgotten(joela) Forgotten(joela) and forall x (Forgotten(x) -> Cloggy(x)) -> therefore Cloggy(joela) Cloggy(joela) and forall x (Cloggy(x) -> Prophetic(x)) -> therefore Prophetic(joela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Sarine is blazing. Sarine is stricken. Sarine is past. Candie is stricken. Melisande is blazing. Melisande is stricken. Melisande is fluent. If Sarine is not fluent then Sarine is past. All stricken people are seagoing. If Candie is flowery and Candie is seagoing then Candie is stingy. All stingy people are blazing. Big people are stingy. If someone is seagoing and not past then they are stingy. Melisande is not past.", "logic": "\nBlazing(sarine)\nStricken(sarine)\nPast(sarine)\nStricken(candie)\nBlazing(melisande)\nStricken(melisande)\nFluent(melisande)\nnot Fluent(sarine) -> Past(sarine)\nforall x (Stricken(x) -> Seagoing(x))\nFlowery(candie) and Seagoing(candie) -> Stingy(candie)\nforall x (Stingy(x) -> Blazing(x))\nforall x (Seagoing(x) -> Stingy(x))\nforall x (Seagoing(x) and not Past(x) -> Stingy(x))\n\nnot Past(melisande)\n\nnot Past(melisande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Hillel is agitative. Hillel is roundish. Hillel is grimy. Silvia is roundish. Donielle is agitative. Donielle is roundish. Donielle is cuboid. If Hillel is not cuboid then Hillel is grimy. All roundish people are dubious. If Silvia is unusable and Silvia is dubious then Silvia is bahai. All bahai people are agitative. Big people are bahai. If someone is dubious and not grimy then they are bahai. Hillel is cuboid.", "logic": "\nAgitative(hillel)\nRoundish(hillel)\nGrimy(hillel)\nRoundish(silvia)\nAgitative(donielle)\nRoundish(donielle)\nCuboid(donielle)\nnot Cuboid(hillel) -> Grimy(hillel)\nforall x (Roundish(x) -> Dubious(x))\nUnusable(silvia) and Dubious(silvia) -> Bahai(silvia)\nforall x (Bahai(x) -> Agitative(x))\nforall x (Dubious(x) -> Bahai(x))\nforall x (Dubious(x) and not Grimy(x) -> Bahai(x))\n\nCuboid(hillel)\n\nCuboid(hillel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Rick is liverish. Rick is hemostatic. Rick is causative. Nikolia is hemostatic. Leonie is liverish. Leonie is hemostatic. Leonie is deterrent. If Rick is not deterrent then Rick is causative. All hemostatic people are wandering. If Nikolia is fibreoptic and Nikolia is wandering then Nikolia is alpha. All alpha people are liverish. Big people are alpha. If someone is wandering and not causative then they are alpha. Leonie is not fibreoptic.", "logic": "\nLiverish(rick)\nHemostatic(rick)\nCausative(rick)\nHemostatic(nikolia)\nLiverish(leonie)\nHemostatic(leonie)\nDeterrent(leonie)\nnot Deterrent(rick) -> Causative(rick)\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) -> Wandering(x))\nFibreoptic(nikolia) and Wandering(nikolia) -> Alpha(nikolia)\nforall x (Alpha(x) -> Liverish(x))\nforall x (Wandering(x) -> Alpha(x))\nforall x (Wandering(x) and not Causative(x) -> Alpha(x))\n\nnot Fibreoptic(leonie)\n\nnot Fibreoptic(leonie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Linette is roughhewn. Linette is enatic. Linette is unfurrowed. Hannibal is enatic. Shurlock is roughhewn. Shurlock is enatic. Shurlock is unshorn. If Linette is not unshorn then Linette is unfurrowed. All enatic people are thundery. If Hannibal is bossy and Hannibal is thundery then Hannibal is carolean. All carolean people are roughhewn. Big people are carolean. If someone is thundery and not unfurrowed then they are carolean. Hannibal is bossy.", "logic": "\nRoughhewn(linette)\nEnatic(linette)\nUnfurrowed(linette)\nEnatic(hannibal)\nRoughhewn(shurlock)\nEnatic(shurlock)\nUnshorn(shurlock)\nnot Unshorn(linette) -> Unfurrowed(linette)\nforall x (Enatic(x) -> Thundery(x))\nBossy(hannibal) and Thundery(hannibal) -> Carolean(hannibal)\nforall x (Carolean(x) -> Roughhewn(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) -> Carolean(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and not Unfurrowed(x) -> Carolean(x))\n\nBossy(hannibal)\n\nBossy(hannibal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Sioux is tardive. Sioux is linelike. Sioux is criminal. Bernd is linelike. Shaylyn is tardive. Shaylyn is linelike. Shaylyn is said. If Sioux is not said then Sioux is criminal. All linelike people are coruscant. If Bernd is brag and Bernd is coruscant then Bernd is varicose. All varicose people are tardive. Big people are varicose. If someone is coruscant and not criminal then they are varicose. Sioux is not brag.", "logic": "\nTardive(sioux)\nLinelike(sioux)\nCriminal(sioux)\nLinelike(bernd)\nTardive(shaylyn)\nLinelike(shaylyn)\nSaid(shaylyn)\nnot Said(sioux) -> Criminal(sioux)\nforall x (Linelike(x) -> Coruscant(x))\nBrag(bernd) and Coruscant(bernd) -> Varicose(bernd)\nforall x (Varicose(x) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) -> Varicose(x))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) and not Criminal(x) -> Varicose(x))\n\nnot Brag(sioux)\n\nnot Brag(sioux) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "Caresse is trojan. Caresse is returning. Caresse is bratty. Clare is returning. Torrin is trojan. Torrin is returning. Torrin is thinkable. If Caresse is not thinkable then Caresse is bratty. All returning people are unvarying. If Clare is inquiring and Clare is unvarying then Clare is hungarian. All hungarian people are trojan. Big people are hungarian. If someone is unvarying and not bratty then they are hungarian. Clare is thinkable.", "logic": "\nTrojan(caresse)\nReturning(caresse)\nBratty(caresse)\nReturning(clare)\nTrojan(torrin)\nReturning(torrin)\nThinkable(torrin)\nnot Thinkable(caresse) -> Bratty(caresse)\nforall x (Returning(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nInquiring(clare) and Unvarying(clare) -> Hungarian(clare)\nforall x (Hungarian(x) -> Trojan(x))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) -> Hungarian(x))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) and not Bratty(x) -> Hungarian(x))\n\nThinkable(clare)\n\nThinkable(clare) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1626"} {"premises": "The suzette capitalize the alisha. The alisha yaup the suzette. The alisha yaup the samaria. The alisha is outlandish. The alisha is deductible. The samaria is lipped. The samaria elegize the suzette. If something is deductible then it elegize the samaria. If something is deductible then it yaup the suzette. If something capitalize the alisha and the alisha elegize the samaria then it is deductible. The alisha yaup the samaria.", "logic": "\nCapitalize(suzette, alisha)\nYaup(alisha, suzette)\nYaup(alisha, samaria)\nOutlandish(alisha)\nDeductible(alisha)\nLipped(samaria)\nElegize(samaria, suzette)\nforall x (Deductible(x) -> Elegize(x, samaria))\nforall x (Deductible(x) -> Yaup(x, suzette))\nforall x (Capitalize(x, alisha) and Elegize(alisha, samaria) -> Deductible(x))\n\nYaup(alisha, samaria)\n\ntherefore Yaup(alisha, samaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The celle dusk the vilma. The vilma bottle the celle. The vilma bottle the jessi. The vilma is addicted. The vilma is estimable. The jessi is nosocomial. The jessi savvy the celle. If something is estimable then it savvy the jessi. If something is estimable then it bottle the celle. If something dusk the vilma and the vilma savvy the jessi then it is estimable. The jessi is not nosocomial.", "logic": "\nDusk(celle, vilma)\nBottle(vilma, celle)\nBottle(vilma, jessi)\nAddicted(vilma)\nEstimable(vilma)\nNosocomial(jessi)\nSavvy(jessi, celle)\nforall x (Estimable(x) -> Savvy(x, jessi))\nforall x (Estimable(x) -> Bottle(x, celle))\nforall x (Dusk(x, vilma) and Savvy(vilma, jessi) -> Estimable(x))\n\nnot Nosocomial(jessi)\n\ntherefore Nosocomial(jessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The jazmin snuggle the blanca. The blanca scoop the jazmin. The blanca scoop the catharine. The blanca is unbiassed. The blanca is scheduled. The catharine is pimply. The catharine inscribe the jazmin. If something is scheduled then it inscribe the catharine. If something is scheduled then it scoop the jazmin. If something snuggle the blanca and the blanca inscribe the catharine then it is scheduled. The blanca inscribe the catharine.", "logic": "\nSnuggle(jazmin, blanca)\nScoop(blanca, jazmin)\nScoop(blanca, catharine)\nUnbiassed(blanca)\nScheduled(blanca)\nPimply(catharine)\nInscribe(catharine, jazmin)\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Inscribe(x, catharine))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Scoop(x, jazmin))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, blanca) and Inscribe(blanca, catharine) -> Scheduled(x))\n\nInscribe(blanca, catharine)\n\nScheduled(blanca) and forall x (Scheduled(x) -> Inscribe(x, catharine)) -> therefore Inscribe(blanca, catharine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The gisela sniff the luna. The luna defeat the gisela. The luna defeat the fitz. The luna is pristine. The luna is twelfth. The fitz is jellylike. The fitz prescribe the gisela. If something is twelfth then it prescribe the fitz. If something is twelfth then it defeat the gisela. If something sniff the luna and the luna prescribe the fitz then it is twelfth. The luna does not visit the fitz.", "logic": "\nSniff(gisela, luna)\nDefeat(luna, gisela)\nDefeat(luna, fitz)\nPristine(luna)\nTwelfth(luna)\nJellylike(fitz)\nPrescribe(fitz, gisela)\nforall x (Twelfth(x) -> Prescribe(x, fitz))\nforall x (Twelfth(x) -> Defeat(x, gisela))\nforall x (Sniff(x, luna) and Prescribe(luna, fitz) -> Twelfth(x))\n\nnot Prescribe(luna, fitz)\n\nTwelfth(luna) and forall x (Twelfth(x) -> Prescribe(x, fitz)) -> therefore Prescribe(luna, fitz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The taddeus explore the pierson. The pierson insufflate the taddeus. The pierson insufflate the tremain. The pierson is squishy. The pierson is vaporific. The tremain is upstairs. The tremain ulcerate the taddeus. If something is vaporific then it ulcerate the tremain. If something is vaporific then it insufflate the taddeus. If something explore the pierson and the pierson ulcerate the tremain then it is vaporific. The taddeus is vaporific.", "logic": "\nExplore(taddeus, pierson)\nInsufflate(pierson, taddeus)\nInsufflate(pierson, tremain)\nSquishy(pierson)\nVaporific(pierson)\nUpstairs(tremain)\nUlcerate(tremain, taddeus)\nforall x (Vaporific(x) -> Ulcerate(x, tremain))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) -> Insufflate(x, taddeus))\nforall x (Explore(x, pierson) and Ulcerate(pierson, tremain) -> Vaporific(x))\n\nVaporific(taddeus)\n\nVaporific(pierson) and forall x (Vaporific(x) -> Ulcerate(x, tremain)) -> therefore Ulcerate(pierson, tremain) Explore(taddeus, pierson) and Ulcerate(pierson, tremain) and forall x (Explore(x, pierson) and Ulcerate(pierson, tremain) -> Vaporific(x)) -> therefore Vaporific(taddeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The doria prohibit the stephanie. The stephanie rout the doria. The stephanie rout the keri. The stephanie is narrow. The stephanie is hysterical. The keri is aging. The keri hoodoo the doria. If something is hysterical then it hoodoo the keri. If something is hysterical then it rout the doria. If something prohibit the stephanie and the stephanie hoodoo the keri then it is hysterical. The doria is not hysterical.", "logic": "\nProhibit(doria, stephanie)\nRout(stephanie, doria)\nRout(stephanie, keri)\nNarrow(stephanie)\nHysterical(stephanie)\nAging(keri)\nHoodoo(keri, doria)\nforall x (Hysterical(x) -> Hoodoo(x, keri))\nforall x (Hysterical(x) -> Rout(x, doria))\nforall x (Prohibit(x, stephanie) and Hoodoo(stephanie, keri) -> Hysterical(x))\n\nnot Hysterical(doria)\n\nHysterical(stephanie) and forall x (Hysterical(x) -> Hoodoo(x, keri)) -> therefore Hoodoo(stephanie, keri) Prohibit(doria, stephanie) and Hoodoo(stephanie, keri) and forall x (Prohibit(x, stephanie) and Hoodoo(stephanie, keri) -> Hysterical(x)) -> therefore Hysterical(doria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The tallia ruggedise the dalton. The dalton dimple the tallia. The dalton dimple the florian. The dalton is darned. The dalton is unharmed. The florian is detailed. The florian suggest the tallia. If something is unharmed then it suggest the florian. If something is unharmed then it dimple the tallia. If something ruggedise the dalton and the dalton suggest the florian then it is unharmed. The florian does not visit the florian.", "logic": "\nRuggedise(tallia, dalton)\nDimple(dalton, tallia)\nDimple(dalton, florian)\nDarned(dalton)\nUnharmed(dalton)\nDetailed(florian)\nSuggest(florian, tallia)\nforall x (Unharmed(x) -> Suggest(x, florian))\nforall x (Unharmed(x) -> Dimple(x, tallia))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, dalton) and Suggest(dalton, florian) -> Unharmed(x))\n\nnot Suggest(florian, florian)\n\nforall x (Unharmed(x) -> Suggest(x, florian)) <- forall x (Ruggedise(x, dalton) and Suggest(dalton, florian) -> Unharmed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The yancey chug the delila. The delila streetwalk the yancey. The delila streetwalk the daisey. The delila is wideband. The delila is alike. The daisey is divisible. The daisey ingest the yancey. If something is alike then it ingest the daisey. If something is alike then it streetwalk the yancey. If something chug the delila and the delila ingest the daisey then it is alike. The daisey streetwalk the yancey.", "logic": "\nChug(yancey, delila)\nStreetwalk(delila, yancey)\nStreetwalk(delila, daisey)\nWideband(delila)\nAlike(delila)\nDivisible(daisey)\nIngest(daisey, yancey)\nforall x (Alike(x) -> Ingest(x, daisey))\nforall x (Alike(x) -> Streetwalk(x, yancey))\nforall x (Chug(x, delila) and Ingest(delila, daisey) -> Alike(x))\n\nStreetwalk(daisey, yancey)\n\nforall x (Alike(x) -> Streetwalk(x, yancey)) <- forall x (Chug(x, delila) and Ingest(delila, daisey) -> Alike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The perle gentrify the stanleigh. The stanleigh dismount the perle. The stanleigh dismount the amos. The stanleigh is allied. The stanleigh is exuvial. The amos is coexisting. The amos stanch the perle. If something is exuvial then it stanch the amos. If something is exuvial then it dismount the perle. If something gentrify the stanleigh and the stanleigh stanch the amos then it is exuvial. The amos is not exuvial.", "logic": "\nGentrify(perle, stanleigh)\nDismount(stanleigh, perle)\nDismount(stanleigh, amos)\nAllied(stanleigh)\nExuvial(stanleigh)\nCoexisting(amos)\nStanch(amos, perle)\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Stanch(x, amos))\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Dismount(x, perle))\nforall x (Gentrify(x, stanleigh) and Stanch(stanleigh, amos) -> Exuvial(x))\n\nnot Exuvial(amos)\n\nforall x (Gentrify(x, stanleigh) and Stanch(stanleigh, amos) -> Exuvial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The pasquale maintain the berri. The berri stockade the pasquale. The berri stockade the averil. The berri is severed. The berri is lxxiii. The averil is defoliated. The averil dash the pasquale. If something is lxxiii then it dash the averil. If something is lxxiii then it stockade the pasquale. If something maintain the berri and the berri dash the averil then it is lxxiii. The averil maintain the berri.", "logic": "\nMaintain(pasquale, berri)\nStockade(berri, pasquale)\nStockade(berri, averil)\nSevered(berri)\nLxxiii(berri)\nDefoliated(averil)\nDash(averil, pasquale)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Dash(x, averil))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) -> Stockade(x, pasquale))\nforall x (Maintain(x, berri) and Dash(berri, averil) -> Lxxiii(x))\n\nMaintain(averil, berri)\n\nMaintain(averil, berri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The myles categorize the peter. The peter dong the myles. The peter dong the wilburn. The peter is recherche. The peter is braided. The wilburn is substitute. The wilburn savage the myles. If something is braided then it savage the wilburn. If something is braided then it dong the myles. If something categorize the peter and the peter savage the wilburn then it is braided. The wilburn does not chase the wilburn.", "logic": "\nCategorize(myles, peter)\nDong(peter, myles)\nDong(peter, wilburn)\nRecherche(peter)\nBraided(peter)\nSubstitute(wilburn)\nSavage(wilburn, myles)\nforall x (Braided(x) -> Savage(x, wilburn))\nforall x (Braided(x) -> Dong(x, myles))\nforall x (Categorize(x, peter) and Savage(peter, wilburn) -> Braided(x))\n\nnot Dong(wilburn, wilburn)\n\nnot Dong(wilburn, wilburn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The lou maraud the jeralee. The jeralee requite the lou. The jeralee requite the dulciana. The jeralee is dirty. The jeralee is whimsical. The dulciana is delineate. The dulciana crucify the lou. If something is whimsical then it crucify the dulciana. If something is whimsical then it requite the lou. If something maraud the jeralee and the jeralee crucify the dulciana then it is whimsical. The lou is blue.", "logic": "\nMaraud(lou, jeralee)\nRequite(jeralee, lou)\nRequite(jeralee, dulciana)\nDirty(jeralee)\nWhimsical(jeralee)\nDelineate(dulciana)\nCrucify(dulciana, lou)\nforall x (Whimsical(x) -> Crucify(x, dulciana))\nforall x (Whimsical(x) -> Requite(x, lou))\nforall x (Maraud(x, jeralee) and Crucify(jeralee, dulciana) -> Whimsical(x))\n\nBlue(lou)\n\nBlue(lou) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-2098"} {"premises": "The aurore enjoin the ehud. The aurore incommode the ehud. The aurore is cernuous. The aurore is carmelite. The aurore sterilize the ehud. The ehud incommode the aurore. The ehud is annoyed. If someone enjoin the aurore and they visit the aurore then the aurore is cernuous. If someone enjoin the ehud then they are dampish. If the aurore incommode the ehud then the ehud is not cernuous. If the aurore incommode the ehud and the aurore enjoin the ehud then the ehud enjoin the aurore. If the ehud is carmelite then the ehud incommode the aurore. If someone is annoyed and sylphlike then they visit the aurore. If someone enjoin the aurore then they chase the ehud. If the aurore incommode the ehud then the aurore enjoin the ehud. The aurore enjoin the ehud.", "logic": "\nEnjoin(aurore, ehud)\nIncommode(aurore, ehud)\nCernuous(aurore)\nCarmelite(aurore)\nSterilize(aurore, ehud)\nIncommode(ehud, aurore)\nAnnoyed(ehud)\nforall x (Enjoin(x, aurore) and Sterilize(x, aurore) -> Cernuous(aurore))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, ehud) -> Dampish(x))\nIncommode(aurore, ehud) -> not Cernuous(ehud)\nIncommode(aurore, ehud) and Enjoin(aurore, ehud) -> Enjoin(ehud, aurore)\nCarmelite(ehud) -> Incommode(ehud, aurore)\nforall x (Annoyed(x) and Sylphlike(x) -> Sterilize(x, aurore))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, aurore) -> Enjoin(x, ehud))\nIncommode(aurore, ehud) -> Enjoin(aurore, ehud)\n\nEnjoin(aurore, ehud)\n\ntherefore Enjoin(aurore, ehud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The toddie cachinnate the monte. The toddie garnish the monte. The toddie is picaresque. The toddie is sinful. The toddie fishtail the monte. The monte garnish the toddie. The monte is backmost. If someone cachinnate the toddie and they visit the toddie then the toddie is picaresque. If someone cachinnate the monte then they are computable. If the toddie garnish the monte then the monte is not picaresque. If the toddie garnish the monte and the toddie cachinnate the monte then the monte cachinnate the toddie. If the monte is sinful then the monte garnish the toddie. If someone is backmost and incurved then they visit the toddie. If someone cachinnate the toddie then they chase the monte. If the toddie garnish the monte then the toddie cachinnate the monte. The monte is not backmost.", "logic": "\nCachinnate(toddie, monte)\nGarnish(toddie, monte)\nPicaresque(toddie)\nSinful(toddie)\nFishtail(toddie, monte)\nGarnish(monte, toddie)\nBackmost(monte)\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, toddie) and Fishtail(x, toddie) -> Picaresque(toddie))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, monte) -> Computable(x))\nGarnish(toddie, monte) -> not Picaresque(monte)\nGarnish(toddie, monte) and Cachinnate(toddie, monte) -> Cachinnate(monte, toddie)\nSinful(monte) -> Garnish(monte, toddie)\nforall x (Backmost(x) and Incurved(x) -> Fishtail(x, toddie))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, toddie) -> Cachinnate(x, monte))\nGarnish(toddie, monte) -> Cachinnate(toddie, monte)\n\nnot Backmost(monte)\n\ntherefore Backmost(monte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The josselyn beach the dewitt. The josselyn clerk the dewitt. The josselyn is heatless. The josselyn is automated. The josselyn choke the dewitt. The dewitt clerk the josselyn. The dewitt is lactogenic. If someone beach the josselyn and they visit the josselyn then the josselyn is heatless. If someone beach the dewitt then they are exonerated. If the josselyn clerk the dewitt then the dewitt is not heatless. If the josselyn clerk the dewitt and the josselyn beach the dewitt then the dewitt beach the josselyn. If the dewitt is automated then the dewitt clerk the josselyn. If someone is lactogenic and untroubled then they visit the josselyn. If someone beach the josselyn then they chase the dewitt. If the josselyn clerk the dewitt then the josselyn beach the dewitt. The josselyn is exonerated.", "logic": "\nBeach(josselyn, dewitt)\nClerk(josselyn, dewitt)\nHeatless(josselyn)\nAutomated(josselyn)\nChoke(josselyn, dewitt)\nClerk(dewitt, josselyn)\nLactogenic(dewitt)\nforall x (Beach(x, josselyn) and Choke(x, josselyn) -> Heatless(josselyn))\nforall x (Beach(x, dewitt) -> Exonerated(x))\nClerk(josselyn, dewitt) -> not Heatless(dewitt)\nClerk(josselyn, dewitt) and Beach(josselyn, dewitt) -> Beach(dewitt, josselyn)\nAutomated(dewitt) -> Clerk(dewitt, josselyn)\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) and Untroubled(x) -> Choke(x, josselyn))\nforall x (Beach(x, josselyn) -> Beach(x, dewitt))\nClerk(josselyn, dewitt) -> Beach(josselyn, dewitt)\n\nExonerated(josselyn)\n\nBeach(josselyn, dewitt) and forall x (Beach(x, dewitt) -> Exonerated(x)) -> therefore Exonerated(josselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The corabel rase the joyann. The corabel cane the joyann. The corabel is blistering. The corabel is vicious. The corabel spare the joyann. The joyann cane the corabel. The joyann is splanchnic. If someone rase the corabel and they visit the corabel then the corabel is blistering. If someone rase the joyann then they are damascene. If the corabel cane the joyann then the joyann is not blistering. If the corabel cane the joyann and the corabel rase the joyann then the joyann rase the corabel. If the joyann is vicious then the joyann cane the corabel. If someone is splanchnic and unrevealed then they visit the corabel. If someone rase the corabel then they chase the joyann. If the corabel cane the joyann then the corabel rase the joyann. The corabel is not damascene.", "logic": "\nRase(corabel, joyann)\nCane(corabel, joyann)\nBlistering(corabel)\nVicious(corabel)\nSpare(corabel, joyann)\nCane(joyann, corabel)\nSplanchnic(joyann)\nforall x (Rase(x, corabel) and Spare(x, corabel) -> Blistering(corabel))\nforall x (Rase(x, joyann) -> Damascene(x))\nCane(corabel, joyann) -> not Blistering(joyann)\nCane(corabel, joyann) and Rase(corabel, joyann) -> Rase(joyann, corabel)\nVicious(joyann) -> Cane(joyann, corabel)\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and Unrevealed(x) -> Spare(x, corabel))\nforall x (Rase(x, corabel) -> Rase(x, joyann))\nCane(corabel, joyann) -> Rase(corabel, joyann)\n\nnot Damascene(corabel)\n\nRase(corabel, joyann) and forall x (Rase(x, joyann) -> Damascene(x)) -> therefore Damascene(corabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The donny reseal the mirna. The donny wear the mirna. The donny is jurassic. The donny is slipshod. The donny outfox the mirna. The mirna wear the donny. The mirna is subtle. If someone reseal the donny and they visit the donny then the donny is jurassic. If someone reseal the mirna then they are childlike. If the donny wear the mirna then the mirna is not jurassic. If the donny wear the mirna and the donny reseal the mirna then the mirna reseal the donny. If the mirna is slipshod then the mirna wear the donny. If someone is subtle and alleviated then they visit the donny. If someone reseal the donny then they chase the mirna. If the donny wear the mirna then the donny reseal the mirna. The mirna reseal the mirna.", "logic": "\nReseal(donny, mirna)\nWear(donny, mirna)\nJurassic(donny)\nSlipshod(donny)\nOutfox(donny, mirna)\nWear(mirna, donny)\nSubtle(mirna)\nforall x (Reseal(x, donny) and Outfox(x, donny) -> Jurassic(donny))\nforall x (Reseal(x, mirna) -> Childlike(x))\nWear(donny, mirna) -> not Jurassic(mirna)\nWear(donny, mirna) and Reseal(donny, mirna) -> Reseal(mirna, donny)\nSlipshod(mirna) -> Wear(mirna, donny)\nforall x (Subtle(x) and Alleviated(x) -> Outfox(x, donny))\nforall x (Reseal(x, donny) -> Reseal(x, mirna))\nWear(donny, mirna) -> Reseal(donny, mirna)\n\nReseal(mirna, mirna)\n\nWear(donny, mirna) and Reseal(donny, mirna) and Wear(donny, mirna) and Reseal(donny, mirna) -> Reseal(mirna, donny) -> therefore Reseal(mirna, donny) Reseal(mirna, donny) and forall x (Reseal(x, donny) -> Reseal(x, mirna)) -> therefore Reseal(mirna, mirna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The keil hood the stanwood. The keil trice the stanwood. The keil is rustic. The keil is unscalable. The keil shape the stanwood. The stanwood trice the keil. The stanwood is overnight. If someone hood the keil and they visit the keil then the keil is rustic. If someone hood the stanwood then they are seagirt. If the keil trice the stanwood then the stanwood is not rustic. If the keil trice the stanwood and the keil hood the stanwood then the stanwood hood the keil. If the stanwood is unscalable then the stanwood trice the keil. If someone is overnight and admittable then they visit the keil. If someone hood the keil then they chase the stanwood. If the keil trice the stanwood then the keil hood the stanwood. The stanwood does not chase the stanwood.", "logic": "\nHood(keil, stanwood)\nTrice(keil, stanwood)\nRustic(keil)\nUnscalable(keil)\nShape(keil, stanwood)\nTrice(stanwood, keil)\nOvernight(stanwood)\nforall x (Hood(x, keil) and Shape(x, keil) -> Rustic(keil))\nforall x (Hood(x, stanwood) -> Seagirt(x))\nTrice(keil, stanwood) -> not Rustic(stanwood)\nTrice(keil, stanwood) and Hood(keil, stanwood) -> Hood(stanwood, keil)\nUnscalable(stanwood) -> Trice(stanwood, keil)\nforall x (Overnight(x) and Admittable(x) -> Shape(x, keil))\nforall x (Hood(x, keil) -> Hood(x, stanwood))\nTrice(keil, stanwood) -> Hood(keil, stanwood)\n\nnot Hood(stanwood, stanwood)\n\nTrice(keil, stanwood) and Hood(keil, stanwood) and Trice(keil, stanwood) and Hood(keil, stanwood) -> Hood(stanwood, keil) -> therefore Hood(stanwood, keil) Hood(stanwood, keil) and forall x (Hood(x, keil) -> Hood(x, stanwood)) -> therefore Hood(stanwood, stanwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The karleen maledict the lorinda. The karleen bifurcate the lorinda. The karleen is unstressed. The karleen is tracked. The karleen dulcorate the lorinda. The lorinda bifurcate the karleen. The lorinda is credal. If someone maledict the karleen and they visit the karleen then the karleen is unstressed. If someone maledict the lorinda then they are found. If the karleen bifurcate the lorinda then the lorinda is not unstressed. If the karleen bifurcate the lorinda and the karleen maledict the lorinda then the lorinda maledict the karleen. If the lorinda is tracked then the lorinda bifurcate the karleen. If someone is credal and meaty then they visit the karleen. If someone maledict the karleen then they chase the lorinda. If the karleen bifurcate the lorinda then the karleen maledict the lorinda. The lorinda is found.", "logic": "\nMaledict(karleen, lorinda)\nBifurcate(karleen, lorinda)\nUnstressed(karleen)\nTracked(karleen)\nDulcorate(karleen, lorinda)\nBifurcate(lorinda, karleen)\nCredal(lorinda)\nforall x (Maledict(x, karleen) and Dulcorate(x, karleen) -> Unstressed(karleen))\nforall x (Maledict(x, lorinda) -> Found(x))\nBifurcate(karleen, lorinda) -> not Unstressed(lorinda)\nBifurcate(karleen, lorinda) and Maledict(karleen, lorinda) -> Maledict(lorinda, karleen)\nTracked(lorinda) -> Bifurcate(lorinda, karleen)\nforall x (Credal(x) and Meaty(x) -> Dulcorate(x, karleen))\nforall x (Maledict(x, karleen) -> Maledict(x, lorinda))\nBifurcate(karleen, lorinda) -> Maledict(karleen, lorinda)\n\nFound(lorinda)\n\nBifurcate(karleen, lorinda) and Maledict(karleen, lorinda) and Bifurcate(karleen, lorinda) and Maledict(karleen, lorinda) -> Maledict(lorinda, karleen) -> therefore Maledict(lorinda, karleen) Maledict(lorinda, karleen) and forall x (Maledict(x, karleen) -> Maledict(x, lorinda)) -> therefore Maledict(lorinda, lorinda) Maledict(lorinda, lorinda) and forall x (Maledict(x, lorinda) -> Found(x)) -> therefore Found(lorinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The ranique butter the suzann. The ranique nitrify the suzann. The ranique is butch. The ranique is shuddery. The ranique inject the suzann. The suzann nitrify the ranique. The suzann is palatine. If someone butter the ranique and they visit the ranique then the ranique is butch. If someone butter the suzann then they are homegrown. If the ranique nitrify the suzann then the suzann is not butch. If the ranique nitrify the suzann and the ranique butter the suzann then the suzann butter the ranique. If the suzann is shuddery then the suzann nitrify the ranique. If someone is palatine and mighty then they visit the ranique. If someone butter the ranique then they chase the suzann. If the ranique nitrify the suzann then the ranique butter the suzann. The suzann is not homegrown.", "logic": "\nButter(ranique, suzann)\nNitrify(ranique, suzann)\nButch(ranique)\nShuddery(ranique)\nInject(ranique, suzann)\nNitrify(suzann, ranique)\nPalatine(suzann)\nforall x (Butter(x, ranique) and Inject(x, ranique) -> Butch(ranique))\nforall x (Butter(x, suzann) -> Homegrown(x))\nNitrify(ranique, suzann) -> not Butch(suzann)\nNitrify(ranique, suzann) and Butter(ranique, suzann) -> Butter(suzann, ranique)\nShuddery(suzann) -> Nitrify(suzann, ranique)\nforall x (Palatine(x) and Mighty(x) -> Inject(x, ranique))\nforall x (Butter(x, ranique) -> Butter(x, suzann))\nNitrify(ranique, suzann) -> Butter(ranique, suzann)\n\nnot Homegrown(suzann)\n\nNitrify(ranique, suzann) and Butter(ranique, suzann) and Nitrify(ranique, suzann) and Butter(ranique, suzann) -> Butter(suzann, ranique) -> therefore Butter(suzann, ranique) Butter(suzann, ranique) and forall x (Butter(x, ranique) -> Butter(x, suzann)) -> therefore Butter(suzann, suzann) Butter(suzann, suzann) and forall x (Butter(x, suzann) -> Homegrown(x)) -> therefore Homegrown(suzann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The osmond abnegate the arlene. The osmond womanize the arlene. The osmond is untitled. The osmond is indexless. The osmond background the arlene. The arlene womanize the osmond. The arlene is formalized. If someone abnegate the osmond and they visit the osmond then the osmond is untitled. If someone abnegate the arlene then they are tippy. If the osmond womanize the arlene then the arlene is not untitled. If the osmond womanize the arlene and the osmond abnegate the arlene then the arlene abnegate the osmond. If the arlene is indexless then the arlene womanize the osmond. If someone is formalized and raising then they visit the osmond. If someone abnegate the osmond then they chase the arlene. If the osmond womanize the arlene then the osmond abnegate the arlene. The osmond does not visit the osmond.", "logic": "\nAbnegate(osmond, arlene)\nWomanize(osmond, arlene)\nUntitled(osmond)\nIndexless(osmond)\nBackground(osmond, arlene)\nWomanize(arlene, osmond)\nFormalized(arlene)\nforall x (Abnegate(x, osmond) and Background(x, osmond) -> Untitled(osmond))\nforall x (Abnegate(x, arlene) -> Tippy(x))\nWomanize(osmond, arlene) -> not Untitled(arlene)\nWomanize(osmond, arlene) and Abnegate(osmond, arlene) -> Abnegate(arlene, osmond)\nIndexless(arlene) -> Womanize(arlene, osmond)\nforall x (Formalized(x) and Raising(x) -> Background(x, osmond))\nforall x (Abnegate(x, osmond) -> Abnegate(x, arlene))\nWomanize(osmond, arlene) -> Abnegate(osmond, arlene)\n\nnot Background(osmond, osmond)\n\nforall x (Formalized(x) and Raising(x) -> Background(x, osmond)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The raye perplex the halvard. The raye brown the halvard. The raye is unselfish. The raye is bully. The raye oblige the halvard. The halvard brown the raye. The halvard is daughterly. If someone perplex the raye and they visit the raye then the raye is unselfish. If someone perplex the halvard then they are autarkical. If the raye brown the halvard then the halvard is not unselfish. If the raye brown the halvard and the raye perplex the halvard then the halvard perplex the raye. If the halvard is bully then the halvard brown the raye. If someone is daughterly and clitoral then they visit the raye. If someone perplex the raye then they chase the halvard. If the raye brown the halvard then the raye perplex the halvard. The halvard oblige the raye.", "logic": "\nPerplex(raye, halvard)\nBrown(raye, halvard)\nUnselfish(raye)\nBully(raye)\nOblige(raye, halvard)\nBrown(halvard, raye)\nDaughterly(halvard)\nforall x (Perplex(x, raye) and Oblige(x, raye) -> Unselfish(raye))\nforall x (Perplex(x, halvard) -> Autarkical(x))\nBrown(raye, halvard) -> not Unselfish(halvard)\nBrown(raye, halvard) and Perplex(raye, halvard) -> Perplex(halvard, raye)\nBully(halvard) -> Brown(halvard, raye)\nforall x (Daughterly(x) and Clitoral(x) -> Oblige(x, raye))\nforall x (Perplex(x, raye) -> Perplex(x, halvard))\nBrown(raye, halvard) -> Perplex(raye, halvard)\n\nOblige(halvard, raye)\n\nforall x (Daughterly(x) and Clitoral(x) -> Oblige(x, raye)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The niles decolonize the filipe. The niles rabbit the filipe. The niles is passable. The niles is shockable. The niles radiate the filipe. The filipe rabbit the niles. The filipe is unwebbed. If someone decolonize the niles and they visit the niles then the niles is passable. If someone decolonize the filipe then they are integral. If the niles rabbit the filipe then the filipe is not passable. If the niles rabbit the filipe and the niles decolonize the filipe then the filipe decolonize the niles. If the filipe is shockable then the filipe rabbit the niles. If someone is unwebbed and genetic then they visit the niles. If someone decolonize the niles then they chase the filipe. If the niles rabbit the filipe then the niles decolonize the filipe. The filipe is not genetic.", "logic": "\nDecolonize(niles, filipe)\nRabbit(niles, filipe)\nPassable(niles)\nShockable(niles)\nRadiate(niles, filipe)\nRabbit(filipe, niles)\nUnwebbed(filipe)\nforall x (Decolonize(x, niles) and Radiate(x, niles) -> Passable(niles))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, filipe) -> Integral(x))\nRabbit(niles, filipe) -> not Passable(filipe)\nRabbit(niles, filipe) and Decolonize(niles, filipe) -> Decolonize(filipe, niles)\nShockable(filipe) -> Rabbit(filipe, niles)\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) and Genetic(x) -> Radiate(x, niles))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, niles) -> Decolonize(x, filipe))\nRabbit(niles, filipe) -> Decolonize(niles, filipe)\n\nnot Genetic(filipe)\n\nnot Genetic(filipe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The nitin bunt the domenic. The nitin formalize the domenic. The nitin is inorganic. The nitin is underclass. The nitin clunk the domenic. The domenic formalize the nitin. The domenic is delimited. If someone bunt the nitin and they visit the nitin then the nitin is inorganic. If someone bunt the domenic then they are eligible. If the nitin formalize the domenic then the domenic is not inorganic. If the nitin formalize the domenic and the nitin bunt the domenic then the domenic bunt the nitin. If the domenic is underclass then the domenic formalize the nitin. If someone is delimited and lvii then they visit the nitin. If someone bunt the nitin then they chase the domenic. If the nitin formalize the domenic then the nitin bunt the domenic. The domenic formalize the domenic.", "logic": "\nBunt(nitin, domenic)\nFormalize(nitin, domenic)\nInorganic(nitin)\nUnderclass(nitin)\nClunk(nitin, domenic)\nFormalize(domenic, nitin)\nDelimited(domenic)\nforall x (Bunt(x, nitin) and Clunk(x, nitin) -> Inorganic(nitin))\nforall x (Bunt(x, domenic) -> Eligible(x))\nFormalize(nitin, domenic) -> not Inorganic(domenic)\nFormalize(nitin, domenic) and Bunt(nitin, domenic) -> Bunt(domenic, nitin)\nUnderclass(domenic) -> Formalize(domenic, nitin)\nforall x (Delimited(x) and Lvii(x) -> Clunk(x, nitin))\nforall x (Bunt(x, nitin) -> Bunt(x, domenic))\nFormalize(nitin, domenic) -> Bunt(nitin, domenic)\n\nFormalize(domenic, domenic)\n\nFormalize(domenic, domenic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The korney mushroom the ossie. The korney debug the ossie. The korney is serene. The korney is reversive. The korney inter the ossie. The ossie debug the korney. The ossie is adult. If someone mushroom the korney and they visit the korney then the korney is serene. If someone mushroom the ossie then they are ritual. If the korney debug the ossie then the ossie is not serene. If the korney debug the ossie and the korney mushroom the ossie then the ossie mushroom the korney. If the ossie is reversive then the ossie debug the korney. If someone is adult and zippy then they visit the korney. If someone mushroom the korney then they chase the ossie. If the korney debug the ossie then the korney mushroom the ossie. The korney is not zippy.", "logic": "\nMushroom(korney, ossie)\nDebug(korney, ossie)\nSerene(korney)\nReversive(korney)\nInter(korney, ossie)\nDebug(ossie, korney)\nAdult(ossie)\nforall x (Mushroom(x, korney) and Inter(x, korney) -> Serene(korney))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, ossie) -> Ritual(x))\nDebug(korney, ossie) -> not Serene(ossie)\nDebug(korney, ossie) and Mushroom(korney, ossie) -> Mushroom(ossie, korney)\nReversive(ossie) -> Debug(ossie, korney)\nforall x (Adult(x) and Zippy(x) -> Inter(x, korney))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, korney) -> Mushroom(x, ossie))\nDebug(korney, ossie) -> Mushroom(korney, ossie)\n\nnot Zippy(korney)\n\nnot Zippy(korney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The tedie blend the kanya. The tedie overgorge the kanya. The tedie is antiknock. The tedie is unconfined. The tedie whet the kanya. The kanya overgorge the tedie. The kanya is measurable. If someone blend the tedie and they visit the tedie then the tedie is antiknock. If someone blend the kanya then they are impeding. If the tedie overgorge the kanya then the kanya is not antiknock. If the tedie overgorge the kanya and the tedie blend the kanya then the kanya blend the tedie. If the kanya is unconfined then the kanya overgorge the tedie. If someone is measurable and unabated then they visit the tedie. If someone blend the tedie then they chase the kanya. If the tedie overgorge the kanya then the tedie blend the kanya. The kanya whet the kanya.", "logic": "\nBlend(tedie, kanya)\nOvergorge(tedie, kanya)\nAntiknock(tedie)\nUnconfined(tedie)\nWhet(tedie, kanya)\nOvergorge(kanya, tedie)\nMeasurable(kanya)\nforall x (Blend(x, tedie) and Whet(x, tedie) -> Antiknock(tedie))\nforall x (Blend(x, kanya) -> Impeding(x))\nOvergorge(tedie, kanya) -> not Antiknock(kanya)\nOvergorge(tedie, kanya) and Blend(tedie, kanya) -> Blend(kanya, tedie)\nUnconfined(kanya) -> Overgorge(kanya, tedie)\nforall x (Measurable(x) and Unabated(x) -> Whet(x, tedie))\nforall x (Blend(x, tedie) -> Blend(x, kanya))\nOvergorge(tedie, kanya) -> Blend(tedie, kanya)\n\nWhet(kanya, kanya)\n\nWhet(kanya, kanya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The salvador gelatinize the andres. The salvador unmask the andres. The salvador is aeolian. The salvador is glittering. The salvador harbour the andres. The andres unmask the salvador. The andres is xeric. If someone gelatinize the salvador and they visit the salvador then the salvador is aeolian. If someone gelatinize the andres then they are felonious. If the salvador unmask the andres then the andres is not aeolian. If the salvador unmask the andres and the salvador gelatinize the andres then the andres gelatinize the salvador. If the andres is glittering then the andres unmask the salvador. If someone is xeric and spicy then they visit the salvador. If someone gelatinize the salvador then they chase the andres. If the salvador unmask the andres then the salvador gelatinize the andres. The salvador does not eat the salvador.", "logic": "\nGelatinize(salvador, andres)\nUnmask(salvador, andres)\nAeolian(salvador)\nGlittering(salvador)\nHarbour(salvador, andres)\nUnmask(andres, salvador)\nXeric(andres)\nforall x (Gelatinize(x, salvador) and Harbour(x, salvador) -> Aeolian(salvador))\nforall x (Gelatinize(x, andres) -> Felonious(x))\nUnmask(salvador, andres) -> not Aeolian(andres)\nUnmask(salvador, andres) and Gelatinize(salvador, andres) -> Gelatinize(andres, salvador)\nGlittering(andres) -> Unmask(andres, salvador)\nforall x (Xeric(x) and Spicy(x) -> Harbour(x, salvador))\nforall x (Gelatinize(x, salvador) -> Gelatinize(x, andres))\nUnmask(salvador, andres) -> Gelatinize(salvador, andres)\n\nnot Unmask(salvador, salvador)\n\nnot Unmask(salvador, salvador) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "The martica lament the avery. The martica bother the avery. The martica is cocksure. The martica is awakened. The martica snitch the avery. The avery bother the martica. The avery is bedless. If someone lament the martica and they visit the martica then the martica is cocksure. If someone lament the avery then they are barmy. If the martica bother the avery then the avery is not cocksure. If the martica bother the avery and the martica lament the avery then the avery lament the martica. If the avery is awakened then the avery bother the martica. If someone is bedless and moorish then they visit the martica. If someone lament the martica then they chase the avery. If the martica bother the avery then the martica lament the avery. The martica lament the martica.", "logic": "\nLament(martica, avery)\nBother(martica, avery)\nCocksure(martica)\nAwakened(martica)\nSnitch(martica, avery)\nBother(avery, martica)\nBedless(avery)\nforall x (Lament(x, martica) and Snitch(x, martica) -> Cocksure(martica))\nforall x (Lament(x, avery) -> Barmy(x))\nBother(martica, avery) -> not Cocksure(avery)\nBother(martica, avery) and Lament(martica, avery) -> Lament(avery, martica)\nAwakened(avery) -> Bother(avery, martica)\nforall x (Bedless(x) and Moorish(x) -> Snitch(x, martica))\nforall x (Lament(x, martica) -> Lament(x, avery))\nBother(martica, avery) -> Lament(martica, avery)\n\nLament(martica, martica)\n\nLament(martica, martica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-342"} {"premises": "Alberto is infective. Meta is amphibian. Faythe is fifteenth. If something is amphibian then it is layered. Kind, cadastral things are layered. Nice, botonee things are infective. All chancy, cadastral things are infective. If Meta is fifteenth then Meta is chancy. Rough things are cadastral. If something is layered then it is fifteenth. If something is layered and not botonee then it is fifteenth. Alberto is infective.", "logic": "\nInfective(alberto)\nAmphibian(meta)\nFifteenth(faythe)\nforall x (Amphibian(x) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Chancy(x) and Cadastral(x) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) and Botonee(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Chancy(x) and Cadastral(x) -> Infective(x))\nFifteenth(meta) -> Chancy(meta)\nforall x (Fifteenth(x) -> Cadastral(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\nforall x (Layered(x) and not Botonee(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\n\nInfective(alberto)\n\ntherefore Infective(alberto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Dawn is brasslike. Hetti is unfettered. Orlando is secretory. If something is unfettered then it is zymoid. Kind, flaring things are zymoid. Nice, intent things are brasslike. All underbred, flaring things are brasslike. If Hetti is secretory then Hetti is underbred. Rough things are flaring. If something is zymoid then it is secretory. If something is zymoid and not intent then it is secretory. Hetti is not unfettered.", "logic": "\nBrasslike(dawn)\nUnfettered(hetti)\nSecretory(orlando)\nforall x (Unfettered(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Underbred(x) and Flaring(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) and Intent(x) -> Brasslike(x))\nforall x (Underbred(x) and Flaring(x) -> Brasslike(x))\nSecretory(hetti) -> Underbred(hetti)\nforall x (Secretory(x) -> Flaring(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) and not Intent(x) -> Secretory(x))\n\nnot Unfettered(hetti)\n\ntherefore Unfettered(hetti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Raphaela is common. Bev is soviet. Glynis is coseismic. If something is soviet then it is fortunate. Kind, past things are fortunate. Nice, wrenching things are common. All lxxiii, past things are common. If Bev is coseismic then Bev is lxxiii. Rough things are past. If something is fortunate then it is coseismic. If something is fortunate and not wrenching then it is coseismic. Bev is fortunate.", "logic": "\nCommon(raphaela)\nSoviet(bev)\nCoseismic(glynis)\nforall x (Soviet(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and Past(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) and Wrenching(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and Past(x) -> Common(x))\nCoseismic(bev) -> Lxxiii(bev)\nforall x (Coseismic(x) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) and not Wrenching(x) -> Coseismic(x))\n\nFortunate(bev)\n\nSoviet(bev) and forall x (Soviet(x) -> Fortunate(x)) -> therefore Fortunate(bev)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Delphina is lecherous. Randi is utile. Matthew is uncharged. If something is utile then it is tritanopic. Kind, immaculate things are tritanopic. Nice, nimble things are lecherous. All bicolour, immaculate things are lecherous. If Randi is uncharged then Randi is bicolour. Rough things are immaculate. If something is tritanopic then it is uncharged. If something is tritanopic and not nimble then it is uncharged. Matthew is not immaculate.", "logic": "\nLecherous(delphina)\nUtile(randi)\nUncharged(matthew)\nforall x (Utile(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and Immaculate(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) and Nimble(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and Immaculate(x) -> Lecherous(x))\nUncharged(randi) -> Bicolour(randi)\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Immaculate(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Uncharged(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) and not Nimble(x) -> Uncharged(x))\n\nnot Immaculate(matthew)\n\nUncharged(matthew) and forall x (Uncharged(x) -> Immaculate(x)) -> therefore Immaculate(matthew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Laverne is deepening. Linoel is abomasal. Fenelia is unheard. If something is abomasal then it is bearing. Kind, impaired things are bearing. Nice, sweetened things are deepening. All weakly, impaired things are deepening. If Linoel is unheard then Linoel is weakly. Rough things are impaired. If something is bearing then it is unheard. If something is bearing and not sweetened then it is unheard. Linoel is unheard.", "logic": "\nDeepening(laverne)\nAbomasal(linoel)\nUnheard(fenelia)\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Bearing(x))\nforall x (Weakly(x) and Impaired(x) -> Bearing(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) and Sweetened(x) -> Deepening(x))\nforall x (Weakly(x) and Impaired(x) -> Deepening(x))\nUnheard(linoel) -> Weakly(linoel)\nforall x (Unheard(x) -> Impaired(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Unheard(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) and not Sweetened(x) -> Unheard(x))\n\nUnheard(linoel)\n\nAbomasal(linoel) and forall x (Abomasal(x) -> Bearing(x)) -> therefore Bearing(linoel) Bearing(linoel) and forall x (Bearing(x) -> Unheard(x)) -> therefore Unheard(linoel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Alfredo is epidemic. Elnar is magnified. Ernst is ringed. If something is magnified then it is islamic. Kind, advanced things are islamic. Nice, achromic things are epidemic. All confirmed, advanced things are epidemic. If Elnar is ringed then Elnar is confirmed. Rough things are advanced. If something is islamic then it is ringed. If something is islamic and not achromic then it is ringed. Elnar is not ringed.", "logic": "\nEpidemic(alfredo)\nMagnified(elnar)\nRinged(ernst)\nforall x (Magnified(x) -> Islamic(x))\nforall x (Confirmed(x) and Advanced(x) -> Islamic(x))\nforall x (Islamic(x) and Achromic(x) -> Epidemic(x))\nforall x (Confirmed(x) and Advanced(x) -> Epidemic(x))\nRinged(elnar) -> Confirmed(elnar)\nforall x (Ringed(x) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Islamic(x) -> Ringed(x))\nforall x (Islamic(x) and not Achromic(x) -> Ringed(x))\n\nnot Ringed(elnar)\n\nMagnified(elnar) and forall x (Magnified(x) -> Islamic(x)) -> therefore Islamic(elnar) Islamic(elnar) and forall x (Islamic(x) -> Ringed(x)) -> therefore Ringed(elnar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Elwood is revolved. Ediva is scorched. Benetta is pink. If something is scorched then it is zaftig. Kind, mawkish things are zaftig. Nice, lobar things are revolved. All romani, mawkish things are revolved. If Ediva is pink then Ediva is romani. Rough things are mawkish. If something is zaftig then it is pink. If something is zaftig and not lobar then it is pink. Ediva is mawkish.", "logic": "\nRevolved(elwood)\nScorched(ediva)\nPink(benetta)\nforall x (Scorched(x) -> Zaftig(x))\nforall x (Romani(x) and Mawkish(x) -> Zaftig(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) and Lobar(x) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Romani(x) and Mawkish(x) -> Revolved(x))\nPink(ediva) -> Romani(ediva)\nforall x (Pink(x) -> Mawkish(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) -> Pink(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) and not Lobar(x) -> Pink(x))\n\nMawkish(ediva)\n\nScorched(ediva) and forall x (Scorched(x) -> Zaftig(x)) -> therefore Zaftig(ediva) Zaftig(ediva) and forall x (Zaftig(x) -> Pink(x)) -> therefore Pink(ediva) Pink(ediva) and forall x (Pink(x) -> Mawkish(x)) -> therefore Mawkish(ediva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Odessa is untapped. Gisella is biconvex. Adora is stretch. If something is biconvex then it is invariable. Kind, glabellar things are invariable. Nice, unapparent things are untapped. All baffling, glabellar things are untapped. If Gisella is stretch then Gisella is baffling. Rough things are glabellar. If something is invariable then it is stretch. If something is invariable and not unapparent then it is stretch. Gisella is not glabellar.", "logic": "\nUntapped(odessa)\nBiconvex(gisella)\nStretch(adora)\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Baffling(x) and Glabellar(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Baffling(x) and Glabellar(x) -> Untapped(x))\nStretch(gisella) -> Baffling(gisella)\nforall x (Stretch(x) -> Glabellar(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Stretch(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) and not Unapparent(x) -> Stretch(x))\n\nnot Glabellar(gisella)\n\nBiconvex(gisella) and forall x (Biconvex(x) -> Invariable(x)) -> therefore Invariable(gisella) Invariable(gisella) and forall x (Invariable(x) -> Stretch(x)) -> therefore Stretch(gisella) Stretch(gisella) and forall x (Stretch(x) -> Glabellar(x)) -> therefore Glabellar(gisella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Webb is lovely. Tull is rippled. Rupert is antidromic. If something is rippled then it is enduring. Kind, bandaged things are enduring. Nice, unbleached things are lovely. All twilled, bandaged things are lovely. If Tull is antidromic then Tull is twilled. Rough things are bandaged. If something is enduring then it is antidromic. If something is enduring and not unbleached then it is antidromic. Webb is not antidromic.", "logic": "\nLovely(webb)\nRippled(tull)\nAntidromic(rupert)\nforall x (Rippled(x) -> Enduring(x))\nforall x (Twilled(x) and Bandaged(x) -> Enduring(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Unbleached(x) -> Lovely(x))\nforall x (Twilled(x) and Bandaged(x) -> Lovely(x))\nAntidromic(tull) -> Twilled(tull)\nforall x (Antidromic(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> Antidromic(x))\nforall x (Enduring(x) and not Unbleached(x) -> Antidromic(x))\n\nnot Antidromic(webb)\n\nforall x (Enduring(x) -> Antidromic(x)) <- forall x (Rippled(x) -> Enduring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Ajay is unhurt. Thayne is unsyllabic. Madelyn is quintuple. If something is unsyllabic then it is catty. Kind, javanese things are catty. Nice, affected things are unhurt. All theistic, javanese things are unhurt. If Thayne is quintuple then Thayne is theistic. Rough things are javanese. If something is catty then it is quintuple. If something is catty and not affected then it is quintuple. Ajay is javanese.", "logic": "\nUnhurt(ajay)\nUnsyllabic(thayne)\nQuintuple(madelyn)\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> Catty(x))\nforall x (Theistic(x) and Javanese(x) -> Catty(x))\nforall x (Catty(x) and Affected(x) -> Unhurt(x))\nforall x (Theistic(x) and Javanese(x) -> Unhurt(x))\nQuintuple(thayne) -> Theistic(thayne)\nforall x (Quintuple(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Catty(x) -> Quintuple(x))\nforall x (Catty(x) and not Affected(x) -> Quintuple(x))\n\nJavanese(ajay)\n\nforall x (Quintuple(x) -> Javanese(x)) <- forall x (Catty(x) -> Quintuple(x)) <- forall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> Catty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Sandra is resonating. Hudson is runproof. Ephram is monegasque. If something is runproof then it is peaceful. Kind, unscathed things are peaceful. Nice, potbellied things are resonating. All capable, unscathed things are resonating. If Hudson is monegasque then Hudson is capable. Rough things are unscathed. If something is peaceful then it is monegasque. If something is peaceful and not potbellied then it is monegasque. Ephram is not peaceful.", "logic": "\nResonating(sandra)\nRunproof(hudson)\nMonegasque(ephram)\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and Unscathed(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Resonating(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and Unscathed(x) -> Resonating(x))\nMonegasque(hudson) -> Capable(hudson)\nforall x (Monegasque(x) -> Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and not Potbellied(x) -> Monegasque(x))\n\nnot Peaceful(ephram)\n\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Peaceful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Graig is grand. Vivie is docile. Tedmund is unblushing. If something is docile then it is towheaded. Kind, brief things are towheaded. Nice, dandy things are grand. All soporific, brief things are grand. If Vivie is unblushing then Vivie is soporific. Rough things are brief. If something is towheaded then it is unblushing. If something is towheaded and not dandy then it is unblushing. Graig is towheaded.", "logic": "\nGrand(graig)\nDocile(vivie)\nUnblushing(tedmund)\nforall x (Docile(x) -> Towheaded(x))\nforall x (Soporific(x) and Brief(x) -> Towheaded(x))\nforall x (Towheaded(x) and Dandy(x) -> Grand(x))\nforall x (Soporific(x) and Brief(x) -> Grand(x))\nUnblushing(vivie) -> Soporific(vivie)\nforall x (Unblushing(x) -> Brief(x))\nforall x (Towheaded(x) -> Unblushing(x))\nforall x (Towheaded(x) and not Dandy(x) -> Unblushing(x))\n\nTowheaded(graig)\n\nforall x (Docile(x) -> Towheaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Charlot is stagnant. Kimmo is anodal. Adelle is addable. If something is anodal then it is unredeemed. Kind, neoclassic things are unredeemed. Nice, crookback things are stagnant. All boxed, neoclassic things are stagnant. If Kimmo is addable then Kimmo is boxed. Rough things are neoclassic. If something is unredeemed then it is addable. If something is unredeemed and not crookback then it is addable. Adelle is not crookback.", "logic": "\nStagnant(charlot)\nAnodal(kimmo)\nAddable(adelle)\nforall x (Anodal(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nforall x (Boxed(x) and Neoclassic(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and Crookback(x) -> Stagnant(x))\nforall x (Boxed(x) and Neoclassic(x) -> Stagnant(x))\nAddable(kimmo) -> Boxed(kimmo)\nforall x (Addable(x) -> Neoclassic(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Addable(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and not Crookback(x) -> Addable(x))\n\nnot Crookback(adelle)\n\nnot Crookback(adelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Cleva is grumose. Shelby is sanitised. Gerianna is lucent. If something is sanitised then it is analgesic. Kind, unpatented things are analgesic. Nice, downwind things are grumose. All greenish, unpatented things are grumose. If Shelby is lucent then Shelby is greenish. Rough things are unpatented. If something is analgesic then it is lucent. If something is analgesic and not downwind then it is lucent. Cleva is sanitised.", "logic": "\nGrumose(cleva)\nSanitised(shelby)\nLucent(gerianna)\nforall x (Sanitised(x) -> Analgesic(x))\nforall x (Greenish(x) and Unpatented(x) -> Analgesic(x))\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and Downwind(x) -> Grumose(x))\nforall x (Greenish(x) and Unpatented(x) -> Grumose(x))\nLucent(shelby) -> Greenish(shelby)\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Unpatented(x))\nforall x (Analgesic(x) -> Lucent(x))\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and not Downwind(x) -> Lucent(x))\n\nSanitised(cleva)\n\nSanitised(cleva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Adrienne is convulsive. Dinah is arched. Gina is unalike. If something is arched then it is academic. Kind, visored things are academic. Nice, akin things are convulsive. All shipshape, visored things are convulsive. If Dinah is unalike then Dinah is shipshape. Rough things are visored. If something is academic then it is unalike. If something is academic and not akin then it is unalike. Gina is not shipshape.", "logic": "\nConvulsive(adrienne)\nArched(dinah)\nUnalike(gina)\nforall x (Arched(x) -> Academic(x))\nforall x (Shipshape(x) and Visored(x) -> Academic(x))\nforall x (Academic(x) and Akin(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nforall x (Shipshape(x) and Visored(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nUnalike(dinah) -> Shipshape(dinah)\nforall x (Unalike(x) -> Visored(x))\nforall x (Academic(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Academic(x) and not Akin(x) -> Unalike(x))\n\nnot Shipshape(gina)\n\nnot Shipshape(gina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Debora is pelagic. Jolynn is delicious. Tonnie is piratical. If something is delicious then it is invalid. Kind, inexplicit things are invalid. Nice, masterful things are pelagic. All jellied, inexplicit things are pelagic. If Jolynn is piratical then Jolynn is jellied. Rough things are inexplicit. If something is invalid then it is piratical. If something is invalid and not masterful then it is piratical. Tonnie is delicious.", "logic": "\nPelagic(debora)\nDelicious(jolynn)\nPiratical(tonnie)\nforall x (Delicious(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Jellied(x) and Inexplicit(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Masterful(x) -> Pelagic(x))\nforall x (Jellied(x) and Inexplicit(x) -> Pelagic(x))\nPiratical(jolynn) -> Jellied(jolynn)\nforall x (Piratical(x) -> Inexplicit(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Piratical(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and not Masterful(x) -> Piratical(x))\n\nDelicious(tonnie)\n\nDelicious(tonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-531"} {"premises": "Quinlan is bowelless. Quinlan is ambulant. Quinlan is apparent. Erek is not apparent. Erek is severed. Reinhard is not beakless. Reinhard is apparent. Mitchael is ambulant. Mitchael is apparent. Mitchael is splashy. If someone is severed and not ambulant then they are bowelless. If someone is beakless then they are bowelless. Kind people are beakless. Cold, apparent people are severed. If someone is uncolored then they are severed. If someone is bowelless and not ambulant then they are not splashy. If Mitchael is uncolored then Mitchael is apparent. Big, bowelless people are apparent. Reinhard is not beakless.", "logic": "\nBowelless(quinlan)\nAmbulant(quinlan)\nApparent(quinlan)\nnot Apparent(erek)\nSevered(erek)\nnot Beakless(reinhard)\nApparent(reinhard)\nAmbulant(mitchael)\nApparent(mitchael)\nSplashy(mitchael)\nforall x (Severed(x) and not Ambulant(x) -> Bowelless(x))\nforall x (Beakless(x) -> Bowelless(x))\nforall x (Ambulant(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Bowelless(x) and Apparent(x) -> Severed(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Severed(x))\nforall x (Bowelless(x) and not Ambulant(x) -> not Splashy(x))\nUncolored(mitchael) -> Apparent(mitchael)\nforall x (Beakless(x) and Bowelless(x) -> Apparent(x))\n\nnot Beakless(reinhard)\n\ntherefore not Beakless(reinhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Diahann is loamless. Diahann is bearing. Diahann is grilled. Alina is not grilled. Alina is moneyed. Holli is not maxillary. Holli is grilled. Gershom is bearing. Gershom is grilled. Gershom is ruminant. If someone is moneyed and not bearing then they are loamless. If someone is maxillary then they are loamless. Kind people are maxillary. Cold, grilled people are moneyed. If someone is pompous then they are moneyed. If someone is loamless and not bearing then they are not ruminant. If Gershom is pompous then Gershom is grilled. Big, loamless people are grilled. Gershom is not bearing.", "logic": "\nLoamless(diahann)\nBearing(diahann)\nGrilled(diahann)\nnot Grilled(alina)\nMoneyed(alina)\nnot Maxillary(holli)\nGrilled(holli)\nBearing(gershom)\nGrilled(gershom)\nRuminant(gershom)\nforall x (Moneyed(x) and not Bearing(x) -> Loamless(x))\nforall x (Maxillary(x) -> Loamless(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Maxillary(x))\nforall x (Loamless(x) and Grilled(x) -> Moneyed(x))\nforall x (Pompous(x) -> Moneyed(x))\nforall x (Loamless(x) and not Bearing(x) -> not Ruminant(x))\nPompous(gershom) -> Grilled(gershom)\nforall x (Maxillary(x) and Loamless(x) -> Grilled(x))\n\nnot Bearing(gershom)\n\ntherefore Bearing(gershom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Kaye is immune. Kaye is osteal. Kaye is unweary. Angel is not unweary. Angel is carinate. Hamlen is not auditive. Hamlen is unweary. Roana is osteal. Roana is unweary. Roana is orbital. If someone is carinate and not osteal then they are immune. If someone is auditive then they are immune. Kind people are auditive. Cold, unweary people are carinate. If someone is vapourous then they are carinate. If someone is immune and not osteal then they are not orbital. If Roana is vapourous then Roana is unweary. Big, immune people are unweary. Roana is auditive.", "logic": "\nImmune(kaye)\nOsteal(kaye)\nUnweary(kaye)\nnot Unweary(angel)\nCarinate(angel)\nnot Auditive(hamlen)\nUnweary(hamlen)\nOsteal(roana)\nUnweary(roana)\nOrbital(roana)\nforall x (Carinate(x) and not Osteal(x) -> Immune(x))\nforall x (Auditive(x) -> Immune(x))\nforall x (Osteal(x) -> Auditive(x))\nforall x (Immune(x) and Unweary(x) -> Carinate(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) -> Carinate(x))\nforall x (Immune(x) and not Osteal(x) -> not Orbital(x))\nVapourous(roana) -> Unweary(roana)\nforall x (Auditive(x) and Immune(x) -> Unweary(x))\n\nAuditive(roana)\n\nOsteal(roana) and forall x (Osteal(x) -> Auditive(x)) -> therefore Auditive(roana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Kary is stearic. Kary is verbal. Kary is glib. Suzanne is not glib. Suzanne is mellow. Felicle is not catty. Felicle is glib. Matty is verbal. Matty is glib. Matty is possessive. If someone is mellow and not verbal then they are stearic. If someone is catty then they are stearic. Kind people are catty. Cold, glib people are mellow. If someone is unwoven then they are mellow. If someone is stearic and not verbal then they are not possessive. If Matty is unwoven then Matty is glib. Big, stearic people are glib. Kary is not catty.", "logic": "\nStearic(kary)\nVerbal(kary)\nGlib(kary)\nnot Glib(suzanne)\nMellow(suzanne)\nnot Catty(felicle)\nGlib(felicle)\nVerbal(matty)\nGlib(matty)\nPossessive(matty)\nforall x (Mellow(x) and not Verbal(x) -> Stearic(x))\nforall x (Catty(x) -> Stearic(x))\nforall x (Verbal(x) -> Catty(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) and Glib(x) -> Mellow(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> Mellow(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) and not Verbal(x) -> not Possessive(x))\nUnwoven(matty) -> Glib(matty)\nforall x (Catty(x) and Stearic(x) -> Glib(x))\n\nnot Catty(kary)\n\nVerbal(kary) and forall x (Verbal(x) -> Catty(x)) -> therefore Catty(kary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Olag is strained. Olag is narrative. Olag is braless. Lyndsey is not braless. Lyndsey is scalable. Kristy is not eligible. Kristy is braless. Cecilia is narrative. Cecilia is braless. Cecilia is periwigged. If someone is scalable and not narrative then they are strained. If someone is eligible then they are strained. Kind people are eligible. Cold, braless people are scalable. If someone is lumpen then they are scalable. If someone is strained and not narrative then they are not periwigged. If Cecilia is lumpen then Cecilia is braless. Big, strained people are braless. Cecilia is strained.", "logic": "\nStrained(olag)\nNarrative(olag)\nBraless(olag)\nnot Braless(lyndsey)\nScalable(lyndsey)\nnot Eligible(kristy)\nBraless(kristy)\nNarrative(cecilia)\nBraless(cecilia)\nPeriwigged(cecilia)\nforall x (Scalable(x) and not Narrative(x) -> Strained(x))\nforall x (Eligible(x) -> Strained(x))\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Eligible(x))\nforall x (Strained(x) and Braless(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Lumpen(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Strained(x) and not Narrative(x) -> not Periwigged(x))\nLumpen(cecilia) -> Braless(cecilia)\nforall x (Eligible(x) and Strained(x) -> Braless(x))\n\nStrained(cecilia)\n\nNarrative(cecilia) and forall x (Narrative(x) -> Eligible(x)) -> therefore Eligible(cecilia) Eligible(cecilia) and forall x (Eligible(x) -> Strained(x)) -> therefore Strained(cecilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Magnum is untrusting. Magnum is hmong. Magnum is happy. Nathanael is not happy. Nathanael is acherontic. Corwin is not variolic. Corwin is happy. Ximenez is hmong. Ximenez is happy. Ximenez is gestural. If someone is acherontic and not hmong then they are untrusting. If someone is variolic then they are untrusting. Kind people are variolic. Cold, happy people are acherontic. If someone is sheltered then they are acherontic. If someone is untrusting and not hmong then they are not gestural. If Ximenez is sheltered then Ximenez is happy. Big, untrusting people are happy. Ximenez is not untrusting.", "logic": "\nUntrusting(magnum)\nHmong(magnum)\nHappy(magnum)\nnot Happy(nathanael)\nAcherontic(nathanael)\nnot Variolic(corwin)\nHappy(corwin)\nHmong(ximenez)\nHappy(ximenez)\nGestural(ximenez)\nforall x (Acherontic(x) and not Hmong(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Variolic(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nforall x (Hmong(x) -> Variolic(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) and Happy(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Sheltered(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) and not Hmong(x) -> not Gestural(x))\nSheltered(ximenez) -> Happy(ximenez)\nforall x (Variolic(x) and Untrusting(x) -> Happy(x))\n\nnot Untrusting(ximenez)\n\nHmong(ximenez) and forall x (Hmong(x) -> Variolic(x)) -> therefore Variolic(ximenez) Variolic(ximenez) and forall x (Variolic(x) -> Untrusting(x)) -> therefore Untrusting(ximenez)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Muffin is alleged. Muffin is glaucous. Muffin is gangly. Dania is not gangly. Dania is twopenny. Reza is not zoological. Reza is gangly. Kessia is glaucous. Kessia is gangly. Kessia is palpitant. If someone is twopenny and not glaucous then they are alleged. If someone is zoological then they are alleged. Kind people are zoological. Cold, gangly people are twopenny. If someone is quadratic then they are twopenny. If someone is alleged and not glaucous then they are not palpitant. If Kessia is quadratic then Kessia is gangly. Big, alleged people are gangly. Kessia is twopenny.", "logic": "\nAlleged(muffin)\nGlaucous(muffin)\nGangly(muffin)\nnot Gangly(dania)\nTwopenny(dania)\nnot Zoological(reza)\nGangly(reza)\nGlaucous(kessia)\nGangly(kessia)\nPalpitant(kessia)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and not Glaucous(x) -> Alleged(x))\nforall x (Zoological(x) -> Alleged(x))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Zoological(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) and Gangly(x) -> Twopenny(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) -> Twopenny(x))\nforall x (Alleged(x) and not Glaucous(x) -> not Palpitant(x))\nQuadratic(kessia) -> Gangly(kessia)\nforall x (Zoological(x) and Alleged(x) -> Gangly(x))\n\nTwopenny(kessia)\n\nGlaucous(kessia) and forall x (Glaucous(x) -> Zoological(x)) -> therefore Zoological(kessia) Zoological(kessia) and forall x (Zoological(x) -> Alleged(x)) -> therefore Alleged(kessia) Alleged(kessia) and Gangly(kessia) and forall x (Alleged(x) and Gangly(x) -> Twopenny(x)) -> therefore Twopenny(kessia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Esma is teutonic. Esma is evanescent. Esma is professed. Dotti is not professed. Dotti is keeled. Lorie is not inflamed. Lorie is professed. Torin is evanescent. Torin is professed. Torin is phalangeal. If someone is keeled and not evanescent then they are teutonic. If someone is inflamed then they are teutonic. Kind people are inflamed. Cold, professed people are keeled. If someone is libidinal then they are keeled. If someone is teutonic and not evanescent then they are not phalangeal. If Torin is libidinal then Torin is professed. Big, teutonic people are professed. Torin is not keeled.", "logic": "\nTeutonic(esma)\nEvanescent(esma)\nProfessed(esma)\nnot Professed(dotti)\nKeeled(dotti)\nnot Inflamed(lorie)\nProfessed(lorie)\nEvanescent(torin)\nProfessed(torin)\nPhalangeal(torin)\nforall x (Keeled(x) and not Evanescent(x) -> Teutonic(x))\nforall x (Inflamed(x) -> Teutonic(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) -> Inflamed(x))\nforall x (Teutonic(x) and Professed(x) -> Keeled(x))\nforall x (Libidinal(x) -> Keeled(x))\nforall x (Teutonic(x) and not Evanescent(x) -> not Phalangeal(x))\nLibidinal(torin) -> Professed(torin)\nforall x (Inflamed(x) and Teutonic(x) -> Professed(x))\n\nnot Keeled(torin)\n\nEvanescent(torin) and forall x (Evanescent(x) -> Inflamed(x)) -> therefore Inflamed(torin) Inflamed(torin) and forall x (Inflamed(x) -> Teutonic(x)) -> therefore Teutonic(torin) Teutonic(torin) and Professed(torin) and forall x (Teutonic(x) and Professed(x) -> Keeled(x)) -> therefore Keeled(torin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Adam is drear. Adam is sylphlike. Adam is shoed. Praneetf is not shoed. Praneetf is edged. Emalee is not precative. Emalee is shoed. Ursulina is sylphlike. Ursulina is shoed. Ursulina is lightsome. If someone is edged and not sylphlike then they are drear. If someone is precative then they are drear. Kind people are precative. Cold, shoed people are edged. If someone is eolithic then they are edged. If someone is drear and not sylphlike then they are not lightsome. If Ursulina is eolithic then Ursulina is shoed. Big, drear people are shoed. Emalee is not drear.", "logic": "\nDrear(adam)\nSylphlike(adam)\nShoed(adam)\nnot Shoed(praneetf)\nEdged(praneetf)\nnot Precative(emalee)\nShoed(emalee)\nSylphlike(ursulina)\nShoed(ursulina)\nLightsome(ursulina)\nforall x (Edged(x) and not Sylphlike(x) -> Drear(x))\nforall x (Precative(x) -> Drear(x))\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) -> Precative(x))\nforall x (Drear(x) and Shoed(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Eolithic(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Drear(x) and not Sylphlike(x) -> not Lightsome(x))\nEolithic(ursulina) -> Shoed(ursulina)\nforall x (Precative(x) and Drear(x) -> Shoed(x))\n\nnot Drear(emalee)\n\nforall x (Edged(x) and not Sylphlike(x) -> Drear(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Janette is reborn. Janette is squeamish. Janette is lxxxviii. Lorianne is not lxxxviii. Lorianne is fragrant. Tabbi is not nihilistic. Tabbi is lxxxviii. Nessy is squeamish. Nessy is lxxxviii. Nessy is suety. If someone is fragrant and not squeamish then they are reborn. If someone is nihilistic then they are reborn. Kind people are nihilistic. Cold, lxxxviii people are fragrant. If someone is changed then they are fragrant. If someone is reborn and not squeamish then they are not suety. If Nessy is changed then Nessy is lxxxviii. Big, reborn people are lxxxviii. Lorianne is reborn.", "logic": "\nReborn(janette)\nSqueamish(janette)\nLxxxviii(janette)\nnot Lxxxviii(lorianne)\nFragrant(lorianne)\nnot Nihilistic(tabbi)\nLxxxviii(tabbi)\nSqueamish(nessy)\nLxxxviii(nessy)\nSuety(nessy)\nforall x (Fragrant(x) and not Squeamish(x) -> Reborn(x))\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) -> Reborn(x))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) -> Nihilistic(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) and Lxxxviii(x) -> Fragrant(x))\nforall x (Changed(x) -> Fragrant(x))\nforall x (Reborn(x) and not Squeamish(x) -> not Suety(x))\nChanged(nessy) -> Lxxxviii(nessy)\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) and Reborn(x) -> Lxxxviii(x))\n\nReborn(lorianne)\n\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) -> Reborn(x)) <- forall x (Squeamish(x) -> Nihilistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Merridie is nary. Merridie is unwonted. Merridie is godless. Tansy is not godless. Tansy is teary. Ikey is not traveled. Ikey is godless. Fernande is unwonted. Fernande is godless. Fernande is savourless. If someone is teary and not unwonted then they are nary. If someone is traveled then they are nary. Kind people are traveled. Cold, godless people are teary. If someone is adulatory then they are teary. If someone is nary and not unwonted then they are not savourless. If Fernande is adulatory then Fernande is godless. Big, nary people are godless. Ikey is not teary.", "logic": "\nNary(merridie)\nUnwonted(merridie)\nGodless(merridie)\nnot Godless(tansy)\nTeary(tansy)\nnot Traveled(ikey)\nGodless(ikey)\nUnwonted(fernande)\nGodless(fernande)\nSavourless(fernande)\nforall x (Teary(x) and not Unwonted(x) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Traveled(x) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Unwonted(x) -> Traveled(x))\nforall x (Nary(x) and Godless(x) -> Teary(x))\nforall x (Adulatory(x) -> Teary(x))\nforall x (Nary(x) and not Unwonted(x) -> not Savourless(x))\nAdulatory(fernande) -> Godless(fernande)\nforall x (Traveled(x) and Nary(x) -> Godless(x))\n\nnot Teary(ikey)\n\nforall x (Nary(x) and Godless(x) -> Teary(x)) <- forall x (Teary(x) and not Unwonted(x) -> Nary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Wat is abundant. Wat is peeved. Wat is totaled. Zak is not totaled. Zak is unlike. Daisy is not unsung. Daisy is totaled. Ragnar is peeved. Ragnar is totaled. Ragnar is biased. If someone is unlike and not peeved then they are abundant. If someone is unsung then they are abundant. Kind people are unsung. Cold, totaled people are unlike. If someone is unadapted then they are unlike. If someone is abundant and not peeved then they are not biased. If Ragnar is unadapted then Ragnar is totaled. Big, abundant people are totaled. Zak is unsung.", "logic": "\nAbundant(wat)\nPeeved(wat)\nTotaled(wat)\nnot Totaled(zak)\nUnlike(zak)\nnot Unsung(daisy)\nTotaled(daisy)\nPeeved(ragnar)\nTotaled(ragnar)\nBiased(ragnar)\nforall x (Unlike(x) and not Peeved(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Unsung(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Peeved(x) -> Unsung(x))\nforall x (Abundant(x) and Totaled(x) -> Unlike(x))\nforall x (Unadapted(x) -> Unlike(x))\nforall x (Abundant(x) and not Peeved(x) -> not Biased(x))\nUnadapted(ragnar) -> Totaled(ragnar)\nforall x (Unsung(x) and Abundant(x) -> Totaled(x))\n\nUnsung(zak)\n\nforall x (Peeved(x) -> Unsung(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Emyle is newfound. Emyle is fresh. Emyle is nocent. Edita is not nocent. Edita is unstarred. Tamera is not reachable. Tamera is nocent. Carlyle is fresh. Carlyle is nocent. Carlyle is greensick. If someone is unstarred and not fresh then they are newfound. If someone is reachable then they are newfound. Kind people are reachable. Cold, nocent people are unstarred. If someone is plethoric then they are unstarred. If someone is newfound and not fresh then they are not greensick. If Carlyle is plethoric then Carlyle is nocent. Big, newfound people are nocent. Emyle is not plethoric.", "logic": "\nNewfound(emyle)\nFresh(emyle)\nNocent(emyle)\nnot Nocent(edita)\nUnstarred(edita)\nnot Reachable(tamera)\nNocent(tamera)\nFresh(carlyle)\nNocent(carlyle)\nGreensick(carlyle)\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and not Fresh(x) -> Newfound(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) -> Newfound(x))\nforall x (Fresh(x) -> Reachable(x))\nforall x (Newfound(x) and Nocent(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Newfound(x) and not Fresh(x) -> not Greensick(x))\nPlethoric(carlyle) -> Nocent(carlyle)\nforall x (Reachable(x) and Newfound(x) -> Nocent(x))\n\nnot Plethoric(emyle)\n\nnot Plethoric(emyle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Debbi is womanly. Debbi is multiple. Debbi is uncanny. Selena is not uncanny. Selena is fungible. Garcia is not sable. Garcia is uncanny. Rachael is multiple. Rachael is uncanny. Rachael is amusive. If someone is fungible and not multiple then they are womanly. If someone is sable then they are womanly. Kind people are sable. Cold, uncanny people are fungible. If someone is fulfilled then they are fungible. If someone is womanly and not multiple then they are not amusive. If Rachael is fulfilled then Rachael is uncanny. Big, womanly people are uncanny. Selena is fulfilled.", "logic": "\nWomanly(debbi)\nMultiple(debbi)\nUncanny(debbi)\nnot Uncanny(selena)\nFungible(selena)\nnot Sable(garcia)\nUncanny(garcia)\nMultiple(rachael)\nUncanny(rachael)\nAmusive(rachael)\nforall x (Fungible(x) and not Multiple(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Sable(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Multiple(x) -> Sable(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Uncanny(x) -> Fungible(x))\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) -> Fungible(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and not Multiple(x) -> not Amusive(x))\nFulfilled(rachael) -> Uncanny(rachael)\nforall x (Sable(x) and Womanly(x) -> Uncanny(x))\n\nFulfilled(selena)\n\nFulfilled(selena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Willis is crank. Willis is bodiless. Willis is alar. Goldina is not alar. Goldina is unreported. Rafaelita is not anticancer. Rafaelita is alar. Cybill is bodiless. Cybill is alar. Cybill is truthful. If someone is unreported and not bodiless then they are crank. If someone is anticancer then they are crank. Kind people are anticancer. Cold, alar people are unreported. If someone is blubbery then they are unreported. If someone is crank and not bodiless then they are not truthful. If Cybill is blubbery then Cybill is alar. Big, crank people are alar. Cybill is not blubbery.", "logic": "\nCrank(willis)\nBodiless(willis)\nAlar(willis)\nnot Alar(goldina)\nUnreported(goldina)\nnot Anticancer(rafaelita)\nAlar(rafaelita)\nBodiless(cybill)\nAlar(cybill)\nTruthful(cybill)\nforall x (Unreported(x) and not Bodiless(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Anticancer(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Bodiless(x) -> Anticancer(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) and Alar(x) -> Unreported(x))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Unreported(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) and not Bodiless(x) -> not Truthful(x))\nBlubbery(cybill) -> Alar(cybill)\nforall x (Anticancer(x) and Crank(x) -> Alar(x))\n\nnot Blubbery(cybill)\n\nnot Blubbery(cybill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "Othilia is ordinary. Othilia is bibless. Othilia is scurrilous. Cissy is not scurrilous. Cissy is blooming. Leann is not calycine. Leann is scurrilous. Melva is bibless. Melva is scurrilous. Melva is ebony. If someone is blooming and not bibless then they are ordinary. If someone is calycine then they are ordinary. Kind people are calycine. Cold, scurrilous people are blooming. If someone is powered then they are blooming. If someone is ordinary and not bibless then they are not ebony. If Melva is powered then Melva is scurrilous. Big, ordinary people are scurrilous. Cissy is bibless.", "logic": "\nOrdinary(othilia)\nBibless(othilia)\nScurrilous(othilia)\nnot Scurrilous(cissy)\nBlooming(cissy)\nnot Calycine(leann)\nScurrilous(leann)\nBibless(melva)\nScurrilous(melva)\nEbony(melva)\nforall x (Blooming(x) and not Bibless(x) -> Ordinary(x))\nforall x (Calycine(x) -> Ordinary(x))\nforall x (Bibless(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) and Scurrilous(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Powered(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) and not Bibless(x) -> not Ebony(x))\nPowered(melva) -> Scurrilous(melva)\nforall x (Calycine(x) and Ordinary(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\n\nBibless(cissy)\n\nBibless(cissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-402"} {"premises": "The martelle secularize the hyacintha. The martelle is teeming. The martelle is asexual. The marigold secularize the germana. The marigold esterify the martelle. The marigold mistime the martelle. The germana secularize the martelle. The germana secularize the marigold. The germana secularize the hyacintha. The germana is acaudal. The hyacintha secularize the martelle. The hyacintha secularize the germana. If someone is teeming then they see the martelle. The martelle is teeming.", "logic": "\nSecularize(martelle, hyacintha)\nTeeming(martelle)\nAsexual(martelle)\nSecularize(marigold, germana)\nEsterify(marigold, martelle)\nMistime(marigold, martelle)\nSecularize(germana, martelle)\nSecularize(germana, marigold)\nSecularize(germana, hyacintha)\nAcaudal(germana)\nSecularize(hyacintha, martelle)\nSecularize(hyacintha, germana)\nforall x (Teeming(x) -> Mistime(x, martelle))\n\nTeeming(martelle)\n\ntherefore Teeming(martelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "The clarine compact the niven. The clarine is cylindric. The clarine is coercive. The larissa compact the uri. The larissa snafu the clarine. The larissa smear the clarine. The uri compact the clarine. The uri compact the larissa. The uri compact the niven. The uri is psychic. The niven compact the clarine. The niven compact the uri. If someone is cylindric then they see the clarine. The niven does not chase the uri.", "logic": "\nCompact(clarine, niven)\nCylindric(clarine)\nCoercive(clarine)\nCompact(larissa, uri)\nSnafu(larissa, clarine)\nSmear(larissa, clarine)\nCompact(uri, clarine)\nCompact(uri, larissa)\nCompact(uri, niven)\nPsychic(uri)\nCompact(niven, clarine)\nCompact(niven, uri)\nforall x (Cylindric(x) -> Smear(x, clarine))\n\nnot Compact(niven, uri)\n\ntherefore Compact(niven, uri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "The oralee martyrise the carita. The oralee is pivotal. The oralee is liver. The staffard martyrise the sheela. The staffard equal the oralee. The staffard clump the oralee. The sheela martyrise the oralee. The sheela martyrise the staffard. The sheela martyrise the carita. The sheela is punitory. The carita martyrise the oralee. The carita martyrise the sheela. If someone is pivotal then they see the oralee. The oralee clump the oralee.", "logic": "\nMartyrise(oralee, carita)\nPivotal(oralee)\nLiver(oralee)\nMartyrise(staffard, sheela)\nEqual(staffard, oralee)\nClump(staffard, oralee)\nMartyrise(sheela, oralee)\nMartyrise(sheela, staffard)\nMartyrise(sheela, carita)\nPunitory(sheela)\nMartyrise(carita, oralee)\nMartyrise(carita, sheela)\nforall x (Pivotal(x) -> Clump(x, oralee))\n\nClump(oralee, oralee)\n\nPivotal(oralee) and forall x (Pivotal(x) -> Clump(x, oralee)) -> therefore Clump(oralee, oralee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "The ethelin bight the emelda. The ethelin is merry. The ethelin is inaudible. The verna bight the jewel. The verna jockey the ethelin. The verna scurry the ethelin. The jewel bight the ethelin. The jewel bight the verna. The jewel bight the emelda. The jewel is jesuit. The emelda bight the ethelin. The emelda bight the jewel. If someone is merry then they see the ethelin. The ethelin does not see the ethelin.", "logic": "\nBight(ethelin, emelda)\nMerry(ethelin)\nInaudible(ethelin)\nBight(verna, jewel)\nJockey(verna, ethelin)\nScurry(verna, ethelin)\nBight(jewel, ethelin)\nBight(jewel, verna)\nBight(jewel, emelda)\nJesuit(jewel)\nBight(emelda, ethelin)\nBight(emelda, jewel)\nforall x (Merry(x) -> Scurry(x, ethelin))\n\nnot Scurry(ethelin, ethelin)\n\nMerry(ethelin) and forall x (Merry(x) -> Scurry(x, ethelin)) -> therefore Scurry(ethelin, ethelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "The winfield sear the clayton. The winfield is timorese. The winfield is confirming. The elmer sear the allene. The elmer train the winfield. The elmer mortice the winfield. The allene sear the winfield. The allene sear the elmer. The allene sear the clayton. The allene is undatable. The clayton sear the winfield. The clayton sear the allene. If someone is timorese then they see the winfield. The allene does not see the winfield.", "logic": "\nSear(winfield, clayton)\nTimorese(winfield)\nConfirming(winfield)\nSear(elmer, allene)\nTrain(elmer, winfield)\nMortice(elmer, winfield)\nSear(allene, winfield)\nSear(allene, elmer)\nSear(allene, clayton)\nUndatable(allene)\nSear(clayton, winfield)\nSear(clayton, allene)\nforall x (Timorese(x) -> Mortice(x, winfield))\n\nnot Mortice(allene, winfield)\n\nforall x (Timorese(x) -> Mortice(x, winfield)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "The mahalia beseem the ricardo. The mahalia is dislikable. The mahalia is leftist. The janine beseem the stillman. The janine interfere the mahalia. The janine reprocess the mahalia. The stillman beseem the mahalia. The stillman beseem the janine. The stillman beseem the ricardo. The stillman is engraved. The ricardo beseem the mahalia. The ricardo beseem the stillman. If someone is dislikable then they see the mahalia. The ricardo reprocess the mahalia.", "logic": "\nBeseem(mahalia, ricardo)\nDislikable(mahalia)\nLeftist(mahalia)\nBeseem(janine, stillman)\nInterfere(janine, mahalia)\nReprocess(janine, mahalia)\nBeseem(stillman, mahalia)\nBeseem(stillman, janine)\nBeseem(stillman, ricardo)\nEngraved(stillman)\nBeseem(ricardo, mahalia)\nBeseem(ricardo, stillman)\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Reprocess(x, mahalia))\n\nReprocess(ricardo, mahalia)\n\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Reprocess(x, mahalia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "The bartlett recoup the freda. The bartlett is nordic. The bartlett is undefined. The kath recoup the nolan. The kath remove the bartlett. The kath weight the bartlett. The nolan recoup the bartlett. The nolan recoup the kath. The nolan recoup the freda. The nolan is continuous. The freda recoup the bartlett. The freda recoup the nolan. If someone is nordic then they see the bartlett. The bartlett does not chase the kath.", "logic": "\nRecoup(bartlett, freda)\nNordic(bartlett)\nUndefined(bartlett)\nRecoup(kath, nolan)\nRemove(kath, bartlett)\nWeight(kath, bartlett)\nRecoup(nolan, bartlett)\nRecoup(nolan, kath)\nRecoup(nolan, freda)\nContinuous(nolan)\nRecoup(freda, bartlett)\nRecoup(freda, nolan)\nforall x (Nordic(x) -> Weight(x, bartlett))\n\nnot Recoup(bartlett, kath)\n\nnot Recoup(bartlett, kath) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "The brodie cater the umberto. The brodie is plowed. The brodie is tingling. The brietta cater the thacher. The brietta expose the brodie. The brietta undock the brodie. The thacher cater the brodie. The thacher cater the brietta. The thacher cater the umberto. The thacher is uncoerced. The umberto cater the brodie. The umberto cater the thacher. If someone is plowed then they see the brodie. The thacher cater the thacher.", "logic": "\nCater(brodie, umberto)\nPlowed(brodie)\nTingling(brodie)\nCater(brietta, thacher)\nExpose(brietta, brodie)\nUndock(brietta, brodie)\nCater(thacher, brodie)\nCater(thacher, brietta)\nCater(thacher, umberto)\nUncoerced(thacher)\nCater(umberto, brodie)\nCater(umberto, thacher)\nforall x (Plowed(x) -> Undock(x, brodie))\n\nCater(thacher, thacher)\n\nCater(thacher, thacher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-125"} {"premises": "Keil is chaste. Juan is polyphase. Fanni is gracile. All polyphase, carroty things are sulfurous. All chaste things are gracile. If something is gracile then it is carroty. If something is carroty then it is venomed. If Fanni is sulfurous then Fanni is venomed. If something is venomed then it is chaste. Keil is chaste.", "logic": "\nChaste(keil)\nPolyphase(juan)\nGracile(fanni)\nforall x (Polyphase(x) and Carroty(x) -> Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) -> Gracile(x))\nforall x (Gracile(x) -> Carroty(x))\nforall x (Carroty(x) -> Venomed(x))\nSulfurous(fanni) -> Venomed(fanni)\nforall x (Venomed(x) -> Chaste(x))\n\nChaste(keil)\n\ntherefore Chaste(keil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Dickie is twilled. Batsheva is lobated. Urbanus is hesitating. All lobated, pectineal things are papillate. All twilled things are hesitating. If something is hesitating then it is pectineal. If something is pectineal then it is luminous. If Urbanus is papillate then Urbanus is luminous. If something is luminous then it is twilled. Dickie is not twilled.", "logic": "\nTwilled(dickie)\nLobated(batsheva)\nHesitating(urbanus)\nforall x (Lobated(x) and Pectineal(x) -> Papillate(x))\nforall x (Twilled(x) -> Hesitating(x))\nforall x (Hesitating(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nforall x (Pectineal(x) -> Luminous(x))\nPapillate(urbanus) -> Luminous(urbanus)\nforall x (Luminous(x) -> Twilled(x))\n\nnot Twilled(dickie)\n\ntherefore Twilled(dickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Gamaliel is defamatory. Xever is moderne. Herminia is ilxx. All moderne, resultant things are apomictic. All defamatory things are ilxx. If something is ilxx then it is resultant. If something is resultant then it is greyed. If Herminia is apomictic then Herminia is greyed. If something is greyed then it is defamatory. Herminia is resultant.", "logic": "\nDefamatory(gamaliel)\nModerne(xever)\nIlxx(herminia)\nforall x (Moderne(x) and Resultant(x) -> Apomictic(x))\nforall x (Defamatory(x) -> Ilxx(x))\nforall x (Ilxx(x) -> Resultant(x))\nforall x (Resultant(x) -> Greyed(x))\nApomictic(herminia) -> Greyed(herminia)\nforall x (Greyed(x) -> Defamatory(x))\n\nResultant(herminia)\n\nIlxx(herminia) and forall x (Ilxx(x) -> Resultant(x)) -> therefore Resultant(herminia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Berchtold is rodlike. Adrianna is triclinic. Dido is cartesian. All triclinic, banausic things are devoid. All rodlike things are cartesian. If something is cartesian then it is banausic. If something is banausic then it is lacteal. If Dido is devoid then Dido is lacteal. If something is lacteal then it is rodlike. Dido is not banausic.", "logic": "\nRodlike(berchtold)\nTriclinic(adrianna)\nCartesian(dido)\nforall x (Triclinic(x) and Banausic(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Rodlike(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Banausic(x))\nforall x (Banausic(x) -> Lacteal(x))\nDevoid(dido) -> Lacteal(dido)\nforall x (Lacteal(x) -> Rodlike(x))\n\nnot Banausic(dido)\n\nCartesian(dido) and forall x (Cartesian(x) -> Banausic(x)) -> therefore Banausic(dido)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Nathalie is algolagnic. Ariela is experient. Aubree is flush. All experient, tinselly things are bats. All algolagnic things are flush. If something is flush then it is tinselly. If something is tinselly then it is twentieth. If Aubree is bats then Aubree is twentieth. If something is twentieth then it is algolagnic. Aubree is twentieth.", "logic": "\nAlgolagnic(nathalie)\nExperient(ariela)\nFlush(aubree)\nforall x (Experient(x) and Tinselly(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Algolagnic(x) -> Flush(x))\nforall x (Flush(x) -> Tinselly(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Twentieth(x))\nBats(aubree) -> Twentieth(aubree)\nforall x (Twentieth(x) -> Algolagnic(x))\n\nTwentieth(aubree)\n\nFlush(aubree) and forall x (Flush(x) -> Tinselly(x)) -> therefore Tinselly(aubree) Tinselly(aubree) and forall x (Tinselly(x) -> Twentieth(x)) -> therefore Twentieth(aubree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Gabrielle is amusive. Merissa is bygone. Elene is unleaded. All bygone, twofold things are subatomic. All amusive things are unleaded. If something is unleaded then it is twofold. If something is twofold then it is fumed. If Elene is subatomic then Elene is fumed. If something is fumed then it is amusive. Elene is not fumed.", "logic": "\nAmusive(gabrielle)\nBygone(merissa)\nUnleaded(elene)\nforall x (Bygone(x) and Twofold(x) -> Subatomic(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Unleaded(x))\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Twofold(x))\nforall x (Twofold(x) -> Fumed(x))\nSubatomic(elene) -> Fumed(elene)\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Amusive(x))\n\nnot Fumed(elene)\n\nUnleaded(elene) and forall x (Unleaded(x) -> Twofold(x)) -> therefore Twofold(elene) Twofold(elene) and forall x (Twofold(x) -> Fumed(x)) -> therefore Fumed(elene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Kellyann is rivalrous. Llewellyn is organismal. Garey is sublunary. All organismal, stroppy things are timorese. All rivalrous things are sublunary. If something is sublunary then it is stroppy. If something is stroppy then it is maladroit. If Garey is timorese then Garey is maladroit. If something is maladroit then it is rivalrous. Garey is rivalrous.", "logic": "\nRivalrous(kellyann)\nOrganismal(llewellyn)\nSublunary(garey)\nforall x (Organismal(x) and Stroppy(x) -> Timorese(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) -> Stroppy(x))\nforall x (Stroppy(x) -> Maladroit(x))\nTimorese(garey) -> Maladroit(garey)\nforall x (Maladroit(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\n\nRivalrous(garey)\n\nSublunary(garey) and forall x (Sublunary(x) -> Stroppy(x)) -> therefore Stroppy(garey) Stroppy(garey) and forall x (Stroppy(x) -> Maladroit(x)) -> therefore Maladroit(garey) Maladroit(garey) and forall x (Maladroit(x) -> Rivalrous(x)) -> therefore Rivalrous(garey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Koren is socratic. Bernette is uneven. Nahum is hyoid. All uneven, laboring things are unplumbed. All socratic things are hyoid. If something is hyoid then it is laboring. If something is laboring then it is botuliform. If Nahum is unplumbed then Nahum is botuliform. If something is botuliform then it is socratic. Koren is not botuliform.", "logic": "\nSocratic(koren)\nUneven(bernette)\nHyoid(nahum)\nforall x (Uneven(x) and Laboring(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Socratic(x) -> Hyoid(x))\nforall x (Hyoid(x) -> Laboring(x))\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Botuliform(x))\nUnplumbed(nahum) -> Botuliform(nahum)\nforall x (Botuliform(x) -> Socratic(x))\n\nnot Botuliform(koren)\n\nSocratic(koren) and forall x (Socratic(x) -> Hyoid(x)) -> therefore Hyoid(koren) Hyoid(koren) and forall x (Hyoid(x) -> Laboring(x)) -> therefore Laboring(koren) Laboring(koren) and forall x (Laboring(x) -> Botuliform(x)) -> therefore Botuliform(koren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Levy is fine. Chloe is chapfallen. Agnes is emboldened. All chapfallen, cymose things are phrasal. All fine things are emboldened. If something is emboldened then it is cymose. If something is cymose then it is leftover. If Agnes is phrasal then Agnes is leftover. If something is leftover then it is fine. Agnes is not phrasal.", "logic": "\nFine(levy)\nChapfallen(chloe)\nEmboldened(agnes)\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and Cymose(x) -> Phrasal(x))\nforall x (Fine(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Cymose(x) -> Leftover(x))\nPhrasal(agnes) -> Leftover(agnes)\nforall x (Leftover(x) -> Fine(x))\n\nnot Phrasal(agnes)\n\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and Cymose(x) -> Phrasal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Bee is shakedown. Stefanie is welcome. Gilbert is unselfish. All welcome, narrowing things are curable. All shakedown things are unselfish. If something is unselfish then it is narrowing. If something is narrowing then it is apropos. If Gilbert is curable then Gilbert is apropos. If something is apropos then it is shakedown. Stefanie is narrowing.", "logic": "\nShakedown(bee)\nWelcome(stefanie)\nUnselfish(gilbert)\nforall x (Welcome(x) and Narrowing(x) -> Curable(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Unselfish(x) -> Narrowing(x))\nforall x (Narrowing(x) -> Apropos(x))\nCurable(gilbert) -> Apropos(gilbert)\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Shakedown(x))\n\nNarrowing(stefanie)\n\nforall x (Unselfish(x) -> Narrowing(x)) <- forall x (Shakedown(x) -> Unselfish(x)) <- forall x (Apropos(x) -> Shakedown(x)) <- forall x (Narrowing(x) -> Apropos(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Cherice is summary. Niall is aguish. Tyson is twelfth. All aguish, achromic things are awol. All summary things are twelfth. If something is twelfth then it is achromic. If something is achromic then it is humorless. If Tyson is awol then Tyson is humorless. If something is humorless then it is summary. Niall is not summary.", "logic": "\nSummary(cherice)\nAguish(niall)\nTwelfth(tyson)\nforall x (Aguish(x) and Achromic(x) -> Awol(x))\nforall x (Summary(x) -> Twelfth(x))\nforall x (Twelfth(x) -> Achromic(x))\nforall x (Achromic(x) -> Humorless(x))\nAwol(tyson) -> Humorless(tyson)\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Summary(x))\n\nnot Summary(niall)\n\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Summary(x)) <- forall x (Achromic(x) -> Humorless(x)) <- forall x (Twelfth(x) -> Achromic(x)) <- forall x (Summary(x) -> Twelfth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Reena is ringleted. Rolf is teensy. Simonette is existing. All teensy, infatuated things are clathrate. All ringleted things are existing. If something is existing then it is infatuated. If something is infatuated then it is intrinsic. If Simonette is clathrate then Simonette is intrinsic. If something is intrinsic then it is ringleted. Reena is clathrate.", "logic": "\nRingleted(reena)\nTeensy(rolf)\nExisting(simonette)\nforall x (Teensy(x) and Infatuated(x) -> Clathrate(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) -> Existing(x))\nforall x (Existing(x) -> Infatuated(x))\nforall x (Infatuated(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nClathrate(simonette) -> Intrinsic(simonette)\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Ringleted(x))\n\nClathrate(reena)\n\nforall x (Teensy(x) and Infatuated(x) -> Clathrate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Patrik is glabellar. Sharl is faux. Felicio is unquotable. All faux, aware things are wartlike. All glabellar things are unquotable. If something is unquotable then it is aware. If something is aware then it is helical. If Felicio is wartlike then Felicio is helical. If something is helical then it is glabellar. Sharl is not smart.", "logic": "\nGlabellar(patrik)\nFaux(sharl)\nUnquotable(felicio)\nforall x (Faux(x) and Aware(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Glabellar(x) -> Unquotable(x))\nforall x (Unquotable(x) -> Aware(x))\nforall x (Aware(x) -> Helical(x))\nWartlike(felicio) -> Helical(felicio)\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Glabellar(x))\n\nnot Smart(sharl)\n\nnot Smart(sharl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Hymie is pretorial. Karlie is renewing. Fan is ongoing. All renewing, enraptured things are painted. All pretorial things are ongoing. If something is ongoing then it is enraptured. If something is enraptured then it is instant. If Fan is painted then Fan is instant. If something is instant then it is pretorial. Fan is renewing.", "logic": "\nPretorial(hymie)\nRenewing(karlie)\nOngoing(fan)\nforall x (Renewing(x) and Enraptured(x) -> Painted(x))\nforall x (Pretorial(x) -> Ongoing(x))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Enraptured(x))\nforall x (Enraptured(x) -> Instant(x))\nPainted(fan) -> Instant(fan)\nforall x (Instant(x) -> Pretorial(x))\n\nRenewing(fan)\n\nRenewing(fan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Saudra is acuminate. Marissa is corneous. Cody is vatic. All corneous, winning things are talky. All acuminate things are vatic. If something is vatic then it is winning. If something is winning then it is moderating. If Cody is talky then Cody is moderating. If something is moderating then it is acuminate. Saudra is not smart.", "logic": "\nAcuminate(saudra)\nCorneous(marissa)\nVatic(cody)\nforall x (Corneous(x) and Winning(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Acuminate(x) -> Vatic(x))\nforall x (Vatic(x) -> Winning(x))\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Moderating(x))\nTalky(cody) -> Moderating(cody)\nforall x (Moderating(x) -> Acuminate(x))\n\nnot Smart(saudra)\n\nnot Smart(saudra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Greta is daily. Issi is baseborn. Ortensia is genic. All baseborn, mesmerized things are fewer. All daily things are genic. If something is genic then it is mesmerized. If something is mesmerized then it is laurelled. If Ortensia is fewer then Ortensia is laurelled. If something is laurelled then it is daily. Greta is baseborn.", "logic": "\nDaily(greta)\nBaseborn(issi)\nGenic(ortensia)\nforall x (Baseborn(x) and Mesmerized(x) -> Fewer(x))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Genic(x))\nforall x (Genic(x) -> Mesmerized(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) -> Laurelled(x))\nFewer(ortensia) -> Laurelled(ortensia)\nforall x (Laurelled(x) -> Daily(x))\n\nBaseborn(greta)\n\nBaseborn(greta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1006"} {"premises": "Lauree is shipshape. Lauree is tenebrious. Lauree is unnameable. Lauree is sapid. Lauree is clouded. Lauree is bounderish. Lauree is umbrageous. Joycelin is shipshape. Joycelin is unnameable. Joycelin is sapid. If something is tenebrious and bounderish then it is shipshape. If something is unnameable and clouded then it is sapid. Quiet, umbrageous things are shipshape. If something is bounderish then it is unnameable. If something is unnameable then it is sapid. Rough things are unnameable. Lauree is umbrageous.", "logic": "\nShipshape(lauree)\nTenebrious(lauree)\nUnnameable(lauree)\nSapid(lauree)\nClouded(lauree)\nBounderish(lauree)\nUmbrageous(lauree)\nShipshape(joycelin)\nUnnameable(joycelin)\nSapid(joycelin)\nforall x (Tenebrious(x) and Bounderish(x) -> Shipshape(x))\nforall x (Unnameable(x) and Clouded(x) -> Sapid(x))\nforall x (Sapid(x) and Umbrageous(x) -> Shipshape(x))\nforall x (Bounderish(x) -> Unnameable(x))\nforall x (Unnameable(x) -> Sapid(x))\nforall x (Bounderish(x) -> Unnameable(x))\n\nUmbrageous(lauree)\n\ntherefore Umbrageous(lauree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6856"} {"premises": "Malina is exposed. Malina is putative. Malina is comal. Malina is israeli. Malina is merciless. Malina is crack. Malina is exogamic. Terri is exposed. Terri is comal. Terri is israeli. If something is putative and crack then it is exposed. If something is comal and merciless then it is israeli. Quiet, exogamic things are exposed. If something is crack then it is comal. If something is comal then it is israeli. Rough things are comal. Terri is not exposed.", "logic": "\nExposed(malina)\nPutative(malina)\nComal(malina)\nIsraeli(malina)\nMerciless(malina)\nCrack(malina)\nExogamic(malina)\nExposed(terri)\nComal(terri)\nIsraeli(terri)\nforall x (Putative(x) and Crack(x) -> Exposed(x))\nforall x (Comal(x) and Merciless(x) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Israeli(x) and Exogamic(x) -> Exposed(x))\nforall x (Crack(x) -> Comal(x))\nforall x (Comal(x) -> Israeli(x))\nforall x (Crack(x) -> Comal(x))\n\nnot Exposed(terri)\n\ntherefore Exposed(terri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6856"} {"premises": "Elane is hitlerian. Elane is leavened. Elane is homegrown. Elane is murmuring. Elane is honeylike. Elane is wordy. Elane is hectic. Colleen is hitlerian. Colleen is homegrown. Colleen is murmuring. If something is leavened and wordy then it is hitlerian. If something is homegrown and honeylike then it is murmuring. Quiet, hectic things are hitlerian. If something is wordy then it is homegrown. If something is homegrown then it is murmuring. Rough things are homegrown. Colleen is not wordy.", "logic": "\nHitlerian(elane)\nLeavened(elane)\nHomegrown(elane)\nMurmuring(elane)\nHoneylike(elane)\nWordy(elane)\nHectic(elane)\nHitlerian(colleen)\nHomegrown(colleen)\nMurmuring(colleen)\nforall x (Leavened(x) and Wordy(x) -> Hitlerian(x))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) and Honeylike(x) -> Murmuring(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) and Hectic(x) -> Hitlerian(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) -> Murmuring(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) -> Homegrown(x))\n\nnot Wordy(colleen)\n\nnot Wordy(colleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6856"} {"premises": "Marquita is lemony. Marquita is pancreatic. Marquita is paschal. Marquita is reasonable. Marquita is nisi. Marquita is adverbial. Marquita is formidable. King is lemony. King is paschal. King is reasonable. If something is pancreatic and adverbial then it is lemony. If something is paschal and nisi then it is reasonable. Quiet, formidable things are lemony. If something is adverbial then it is paschal. If something is paschal then it is reasonable. Rough things are paschal. King is nisi.", "logic": "\nLemony(marquita)\nPancreatic(marquita)\nPaschal(marquita)\nReasonable(marquita)\nNisi(marquita)\nAdverbial(marquita)\nFormidable(marquita)\nLemony(king)\nPaschal(king)\nReasonable(king)\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) and Adverbial(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Paschal(x) and Nisi(x) -> Reasonable(x))\nforall x (Reasonable(x) and Formidable(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Adverbial(x) -> Paschal(x))\nforall x (Paschal(x) -> Reasonable(x))\nforall x (Adverbial(x) -> Paschal(x))\n\nNisi(king)\n\nNisi(king) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6856"} {"premises": "Fanchon is overbusy. Othilia is not unpunctual. Minerva is overbusy. If Othilia is not ilxx then Othilia is uncooked. All unpunctual things are not uncooked. If something is husky then it is unpunctual. If Fanchon is not ilxx then Fanchon is unpunctual. All overbusy things are husky. If something is overbusy and not uncooked then it is odious. Fanchon is overbusy.", "logic": "\nOverbusy(fanchon)\nnot Unpunctual(othilia)\nOverbusy(minerva)\nnot Ilxx(othilia) -> Uncooked(othilia)\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> not Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Husky(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\nnot Ilxx(fanchon) -> Unpunctual(fanchon)\nforall x (Overbusy(x) -> Husky(x))\nforall x (Overbusy(x) and not Uncooked(x) -> Odious(x))\n\nOverbusy(fanchon)\n\ntherefore Overbusy(fanchon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Adi is cosmogonic. Claudia is not broadloom. Lloyd is cosmogonic. If Claudia is not lxxi then Claudia is coccygeal. All broadloom things are not coccygeal. If something is moblike then it is broadloom. If Adi is not lxxi then Adi is broadloom. All cosmogonic things are moblike. If something is cosmogonic and not coccygeal then it is cognitive. Adi is not cosmogonic.", "logic": "\nCosmogonic(adi)\nnot Broadloom(claudia)\nCosmogonic(lloyd)\nnot Lxxi(claudia) -> Coccygeal(claudia)\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> not Coccygeal(x))\nforall x (Moblike(x) -> Broadloom(x))\nnot Lxxi(adi) -> Broadloom(adi)\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Moblike(x))\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) and not Coccygeal(x) -> Cognitive(x))\n\nnot Cosmogonic(adi)\n\ntherefore Cosmogonic(adi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Jeffry is chanted. Lyndon is not stout. Somerset is chanted. If Lyndon is not consummate then Lyndon is spanking. All stout things are not spanking. If something is scientific then it is stout. If Jeffry is not consummate then Jeffry is stout. All chanted things are scientific. If something is chanted and not spanking then it is seasonable. Somerset is scientific.", "logic": "\nChanted(jeffry)\nnot Stout(lyndon)\nChanted(somerset)\nnot Consummate(lyndon) -> Spanking(lyndon)\nforall x (Stout(x) -> not Spanking(x))\nforall x (Scientific(x) -> Stout(x))\nnot Consummate(jeffry) -> Stout(jeffry)\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Scientific(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) and not Spanking(x) -> Seasonable(x))\n\nScientific(somerset)\n\nChanted(somerset) and forall x (Chanted(x) -> Scientific(x)) -> therefore Scientific(somerset)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Miguelita is peppy. Dolores is not decussate. Flossy is peppy. If Dolores is not pregnant then Dolores is riemannian. All decussate things are not riemannian. If something is eager then it is decussate. If Miguelita is not pregnant then Miguelita is decussate. All peppy things are eager. If something is peppy and not riemannian then it is qualified. Miguelita is not eager.", "logic": "\nPeppy(miguelita)\nnot Decussate(dolores)\nPeppy(flossy)\nnot Pregnant(dolores) -> Riemannian(dolores)\nforall x (Decussate(x) -> not Riemannian(x))\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Decussate(x))\nnot Pregnant(miguelita) -> Decussate(miguelita)\nforall x (Peppy(x) -> Eager(x))\nforall x (Peppy(x) and not Riemannian(x) -> Qualified(x))\n\nnot Eager(miguelita)\n\nPeppy(miguelita) and forall x (Peppy(x) -> Eager(x)) -> therefore Eager(miguelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Helena is motorized. Cherrita is not swift. Thaddeus is motorized. If Cherrita is not faithful then Cherrita is matched. All swift things are not matched. If something is adaptable then it is swift. If Helena is not faithful then Helena is swift. All motorized things are adaptable. If something is motorized and not matched then it is tasty. Helena is swift.", "logic": "\nMotorized(helena)\nnot Swift(cherrita)\nMotorized(thaddeus)\nnot Faithful(cherrita) -> Matched(cherrita)\nforall x (Swift(x) -> not Matched(x))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Swift(x))\nnot Faithful(helena) -> Swift(helena)\nforall x (Motorized(x) -> Adaptable(x))\nforall x (Motorized(x) and not Matched(x) -> Tasty(x))\n\nSwift(helena)\n\nMotorized(helena) and forall x (Motorized(x) -> Adaptable(x)) -> therefore Adaptable(helena) Adaptable(helena) and forall x (Adaptable(x) -> Swift(x)) -> therefore Swift(helena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Bert is nonpublic. Rivkah is not american. Gav is nonpublic. If Rivkah is not umbrageous then Rivkah is fabulous. All american things are not fabulous. If something is utter then it is american. If Bert is not umbrageous then Bert is american. All nonpublic things are utter. If something is nonpublic and not fabulous then it is exulting. Gav is not american.", "logic": "\nNonpublic(bert)\nnot American(rivkah)\nNonpublic(gav)\nnot Umbrageous(rivkah) -> Fabulous(rivkah)\nforall x (American(x) -> not Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) -> American(x))\nnot Umbrageous(bert) -> American(bert)\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Utter(x))\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) and not Fabulous(x) -> Exulting(x))\n\nnot American(gav)\n\nNonpublic(gav) and forall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Utter(x)) -> therefore Utter(gav) Utter(gav) and forall x (Utter(x) -> American(x)) -> therefore American(gav)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Shoshanna is blithesome. Madison is not furious. Yancy is blithesome. If Madison is not xcii then Madison is inarguable. All furious things are not inarguable. If something is flagrant then it is furious. If Shoshanna is not xcii then Shoshanna is furious. All blithesome things are flagrant. If something is blithesome and not inarguable then it is telling. Shoshanna is not inarguable.", "logic": "\nBlithesome(shoshanna)\nnot Furious(madison)\nBlithesome(yancy)\nnot Xcii(madison) -> Inarguable(madison)\nforall x (Furious(x) -> not Inarguable(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Furious(x))\nnot Xcii(shoshanna) -> Furious(shoshanna)\nforall x (Blithesome(x) -> Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Blithesome(x) and not Inarguable(x) -> Telling(x))\n\nnot Inarguable(shoshanna)\n\nBlithesome(shoshanna) and forall x (Blithesome(x) -> Flagrant(x)) -> therefore Flagrant(shoshanna) Flagrant(shoshanna) and forall x (Flagrant(x) -> Furious(x)) -> therefore Furious(shoshanna) Furious(shoshanna) and forall x (Furious(x) -> not Inarguable(x)) -> therefore not Inarguable(shoshanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Bealle is done. Kial is not panoplied. Ottilie is done. If Kial is not captive then Kial is somber. All panoplied things are not somber. If something is clockwise then it is panoplied. If Bealle is not captive then Bealle is panoplied. All done things are clockwise. If something is done and not somber then it is decimal. Bealle is somber.", "logic": "\nDone(bealle)\nnot Panoplied(kial)\nDone(ottilie)\nnot Captive(kial) -> Somber(kial)\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> not Somber(x))\nforall x (Clockwise(x) -> Panoplied(x))\nnot Captive(bealle) -> Panoplied(bealle)\nforall x (Done(x) -> Clockwise(x))\nforall x (Done(x) and not Somber(x) -> Decimal(x))\n\nSomber(bealle)\n\nDone(bealle) and forall x (Done(x) -> Clockwise(x)) -> therefore Clockwise(bealle) Clockwise(bealle) and forall x (Clockwise(x) -> Panoplied(x)) -> therefore Panoplied(bealle) Panoplied(bealle) and forall x (Panoplied(x) -> not Somber(x)) -> therefore not Somber(bealle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Donica is dextrorsal. Elbert is not censurable. Cassy is dextrorsal. If Elbert is not nonextant then Elbert is wound. All censurable things are not wound. If something is compulsive then it is censurable. If Donica is not nonextant then Donica is censurable. All dextrorsal things are compulsive. If something is dextrorsal and not wound then it is ruling. Elbert is not compulsive.", "logic": "\nDextrorsal(donica)\nnot Censurable(elbert)\nDextrorsal(cassy)\nnot Nonextant(elbert) -> Wound(elbert)\nforall x (Censurable(x) -> not Wound(x))\nforall x (Compulsive(x) -> Censurable(x))\nnot Nonextant(donica) -> Censurable(donica)\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) -> Compulsive(x))\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) and not Wound(x) -> Ruling(x))\n\nnot Compulsive(elbert)\n\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) -> Compulsive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Katya is huge. Flo is not winey. Andria is huge. If Flo is not nucleate then Flo is adactylous. All winey things are not adactylous. If something is pectinate then it is winey. If Katya is not nucleate then Katya is winey. All huge things are pectinate. If something is huge and not adactylous then it is quadratic. Flo is adactylous.", "logic": "\nHuge(katya)\nnot Winey(flo)\nHuge(andria)\nnot Nucleate(flo) -> Adactylous(flo)\nforall x (Winey(x) -> not Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) -> Winey(x))\nnot Nucleate(katya) -> Winey(katya)\nforall x (Huge(x) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Huge(x) and not Adactylous(x) -> Quadratic(x))\n\nAdactylous(flo)\n\nnot Nucleate(flo) -> Adactylous(flo) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Austine is ablated. Werner is not foregone. Agretha is ablated. If Werner is not rimy then Werner is preset. All foregone things are not preset. If something is raging then it is foregone. If Austine is not rimy then Austine is foregone. All ablated things are raging. If something is ablated and not preset then it is tufted. Werner is not tufted.", "logic": "\nAblated(austine)\nnot Foregone(werner)\nAblated(agretha)\nnot Rimy(werner) -> Preset(werner)\nforall x (Foregone(x) -> not Preset(x))\nforall x (Raging(x) -> Foregone(x))\nnot Rimy(austine) -> Foregone(austine)\nforall x (Ablated(x) -> Raging(x))\nforall x (Ablated(x) and not Preset(x) -> Tufted(x))\n\nnot Tufted(werner)\n\nforall x (Ablated(x) and not Preset(x) -> Tufted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Bartie is sceptical. Eba is not connective. Ioana is sceptical. If Eba is not unvigilant then Eba is generic. All connective things are not generic. If something is ossiculate then it is connective. If Bartie is not unvigilant then Bartie is connective. All sceptical things are ossiculate. If something is sceptical and not generic then it is dislocated. Eba is unvigilant.", "logic": "\nSceptical(bartie)\nnot Connective(eba)\nSceptical(ioana)\nnot Unvigilant(eba) -> Generic(eba)\nforall x (Connective(x) -> not Generic(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Connective(x))\nnot Unvigilant(bartie) -> Connective(bartie)\nforall x (Sceptical(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Sceptical(x) and not Generic(x) -> Dislocated(x))\n\nUnvigilant(eba)\n\nUnvigilant(eba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Benjy is hadean. Dulcinea is not geodesic. Yehudi is hadean. If Dulcinea is not hollow then Dulcinea is thrombosed. All geodesic things are not thrombosed. If something is unpeaceful then it is geodesic. If Benjy is not hollow then Benjy is geodesic. All hadean things are unpeaceful. If something is hadean and not thrombosed then it is activistic. Benjy is not hollow.", "logic": "\nHadean(benjy)\nnot Geodesic(dulcinea)\nHadean(yehudi)\nnot Hollow(dulcinea) -> Thrombosed(dulcinea)\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> not Thrombosed(x))\nforall x (Unpeaceful(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nnot Hollow(benjy) -> Geodesic(benjy)\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Unpeaceful(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) and not Thrombosed(x) -> Activistic(x))\n\nnot Hollow(benjy)\n\nnot Hollow(benjy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Zola is complex. Rhea is not bifacial. Breena is complex. If Rhea is not pied then Rhea is expressed. All bifacial things are not expressed. If something is estrogenic then it is bifacial. If Zola is not pied then Zola is bifacial. All complex things are estrogenic. If something is complex and not expressed then it is unvigilant. Rhea is complex.", "logic": "\nComplex(zola)\nnot Bifacial(rhea)\nComplex(breena)\nnot Pied(rhea) -> Expressed(rhea)\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> not Expressed(x))\nforall x (Estrogenic(x) -> Bifacial(x))\nnot Pied(zola) -> Bifacial(zola)\nforall x (Complex(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Complex(x) and not Expressed(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\n\nComplex(rhea)\n\nComplex(rhea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Cherye is idiopathic. Hercule is not anurous. Elane is idiopathic. If Hercule is not noted then Hercule is flexible. All anurous things are not flexible. If something is shrubby then it is anurous. If Cherye is not noted then Cherye is anurous. All idiopathic things are shrubby. If something is idiopathic and not flexible then it is miniscule. Cherye is not blue.", "logic": "\nIdiopathic(cherye)\nnot Anurous(hercule)\nIdiopathic(elane)\nnot Noted(hercule) -> Flexible(hercule)\nforall x (Anurous(x) -> not Flexible(x))\nforall x (Shrubby(x) -> Anurous(x))\nnot Noted(cherye) -> Anurous(cherye)\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) -> Shrubby(x))\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) and not Flexible(x) -> Miniscule(x))\n\nnot Blue(cherye)\n\nnot Blue(cherye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Brodie is spunky. Kaile is not autophytic. Annamari is spunky. If Kaile is not trilingual then Kaile is concurrent. All autophytic things are not concurrent. If something is craved then it is autophytic. If Brodie is not trilingual then Brodie is autophytic. All spunky things are craved. If something is spunky and not concurrent then it is exotic. Annamari is trilingual.", "logic": "\nSpunky(brodie)\nnot Autophytic(kaile)\nSpunky(annamari)\nnot Trilingual(kaile) -> Concurrent(kaile)\nforall x (Autophytic(x) -> not Concurrent(x))\nforall x (Craved(x) -> Autophytic(x))\nnot Trilingual(brodie) -> Autophytic(brodie)\nforall x (Spunky(x) -> Craved(x))\nforall x (Spunky(x) and not Concurrent(x) -> Exotic(x))\n\nTrilingual(annamari)\n\nTrilingual(annamari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1223"} {"premises": "Nickolas is silly. Nickolas is runcinate. Nickolas is creepy. Marylynne is lacrimal. Marylynne is earthly. Marylynne is silly. Marylynne is runcinate. Marylynne is creepy. Imojean is earthly. Imojean is runcinate. Green, creepy things are ruled. All sized things are lacrimal. If something is runcinate then it is sized. Marylynne is silly.", "logic": "\nSilly(nickolas)\nRuncinate(nickolas)\nCreepy(nickolas)\nLacrimal(marylynne)\nEarthly(marylynne)\nSilly(marylynne)\nRuncinate(marylynne)\nCreepy(marylynne)\nEarthly(imojean)\nRuncinate(imojean)\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Creepy(x) -> Ruled(x))\nforall x (Sized(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Runcinate(x) -> Sized(x))\n\nSilly(marylynne)\n\ntherefore Silly(marylynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Inga is leal. Inga is watercress. Inga is digestive. Gerrie is isotropic. Gerrie is heroic. Gerrie is leal. Gerrie is watercress. Gerrie is digestive. Otis is heroic. Otis is watercress. Green, digestive things are heritable. All climatic things are isotropic. If something is watercress then it is climatic. Inga is not leal.", "logic": "\nLeal(inga)\nWatercress(inga)\nDigestive(inga)\nIsotropic(gerrie)\nHeroic(gerrie)\nLeal(gerrie)\nWatercress(gerrie)\nDigestive(gerrie)\nHeroic(otis)\nWatercress(otis)\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Digestive(x) -> Heritable(x))\nforall x (Climatic(x) -> Isotropic(x))\nforall x (Watercress(x) -> Climatic(x))\n\nnot Leal(inga)\n\ntherefore Leal(inga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Thorndike is incestuous. Thorndike is glassless. Thorndike is fiducial. Noelani is treed. Noelani is zygomatic. Noelani is incestuous. Noelani is glassless. Noelani is fiducial. Ulrick is zygomatic. Ulrick is glassless. Green, fiducial things are shaken. All dual things are treed. If something is glassless then it is dual. Noelani is shaken.", "logic": "\nIncestuous(thorndike)\nGlassless(thorndike)\nFiducial(thorndike)\nTreed(noelani)\nZygomatic(noelani)\nIncestuous(noelani)\nGlassless(noelani)\nFiducial(noelani)\nZygomatic(ulrick)\nGlassless(ulrick)\nforall x (Treed(x) and Fiducial(x) -> Shaken(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Treed(x))\nforall x (Glassless(x) -> Dual(x))\n\nShaken(noelani)\n\nTreed(noelani) and Fiducial(noelani) and forall x (Treed(x) and Fiducial(x) -> Shaken(x)) -> therefore Shaken(noelani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Alidia is fibrinous. Alidia is ligneous. Alidia is urbanized. Nigel is seraphical. Nigel is flyblown. Nigel is fibrinous. Nigel is ligneous. Nigel is urbanized. Hurley is flyblown. Hurley is ligneous. Green, urbanized things are rostrate. All bedimmed things are seraphical. If something is ligneous then it is bedimmed. Hurley is not bedimmed.", "logic": "\nFibrinous(alidia)\nLigneous(alidia)\nUrbanized(alidia)\nSeraphical(nigel)\nFlyblown(nigel)\nFibrinous(nigel)\nLigneous(nigel)\nUrbanized(nigel)\nFlyblown(hurley)\nLigneous(hurley)\nforall x (Seraphical(x) and Urbanized(x) -> Rostrate(x))\nforall x (Bedimmed(x) -> Seraphical(x))\nforall x (Ligneous(x) -> Bedimmed(x))\n\nnot Bedimmed(hurley)\n\nLigneous(hurley) and forall x (Ligneous(x) -> Bedimmed(x)) -> therefore Bedimmed(hurley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Carlee is impulsive. Carlee is heavy. Carlee is asternal. Terrianne is muslim. Terrianne is mass. Terrianne is impulsive. Terrianne is heavy. Terrianne is asternal. Robyn is mass. Robyn is heavy. Green, asternal things are frumpy. All trendy things are muslim. If something is heavy then it is trendy. Robyn is muslim.", "logic": "\nImpulsive(carlee)\nHeavy(carlee)\nAsternal(carlee)\nMuslim(terrianne)\nMass(terrianne)\nImpulsive(terrianne)\nHeavy(terrianne)\nAsternal(terrianne)\nMass(robyn)\nHeavy(robyn)\nforall x (Muslim(x) and Asternal(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nforall x (Trendy(x) -> Muslim(x))\nforall x (Heavy(x) -> Trendy(x))\n\nMuslim(robyn)\n\nHeavy(robyn) and forall x (Heavy(x) -> Trendy(x)) -> therefore Trendy(robyn) Trendy(robyn) and forall x (Trendy(x) -> Muslim(x)) -> therefore Muslim(robyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Iago is liberal. Iago is anginous. Iago is churning. Othilie is gnostic. Othilie is pesky. Othilie is liberal. Othilie is anginous. Othilie is churning. Klarrisa is pesky. Klarrisa is anginous. Green, churning things are fighting. All volcanic things are gnostic. If something is anginous then it is volcanic. Klarrisa is not gnostic.", "logic": "\nLiberal(iago)\nAnginous(iago)\nChurning(iago)\nGnostic(othilie)\nPesky(othilie)\nLiberal(othilie)\nAnginous(othilie)\nChurning(othilie)\nPesky(klarrisa)\nAnginous(klarrisa)\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Churning(x) -> Fighting(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) -> Gnostic(x))\nforall x (Anginous(x) -> Volcanic(x))\n\nnot Gnostic(klarrisa)\n\nAnginous(klarrisa) and forall x (Anginous(x) -> Volcanic(x)) -> therefore Volcanic(klarrisa) Volcanic(klarrisa) and forall x (Volcanic(x) -> Gnostic(x)) -> therefore Gnostic(klarrisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Waylan is linked. Waylan is invariable. Waylan is parched. Thomasin is central. Thomasin is mnemonic. Thomasin is linked. Thomasin is invariable. Thomasin is parched. Iolanthe is mnemonic. Iolanthe is invariable. Green, parched things are berserk. All hysterical things are central. If something is invariable then it is hysterical. Waylan is berserk.", "logic": "\nLinked(waylan)\nInvariable(waylan)\nParched(waylan)\nCentral(thomasin)\nMnemonic(thomasin)\nLinked(thomasin)\nInvariable(thomasin)\nParched(thomasin)\nMnemonic(iolanthe)\nInvariable(iolanthe)\nforall x (Central(x) and Parched(x) -> Berserk(x))\nforall x (Hysterical(x) -> Central(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Hysterical(x))\n\nBerserk(waylan)\n\nInvariable(waylan) and forall x (Invariable(x) -> Hysterical(x)) -> therefore Hysterical(waylan) Hysterical(waylan) and forall x (Hysterical(x) -> Central(x)) -> therefore Central(waylan) Central(waylan) and Parched(waylan) and forall x (Central(x) and Parched(x) -> Berserk(x)) -> therefore Berserk(waylan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Torrie is chapped. Torrie is echt. Torrie is roofless. Jeanette is absent. Jeanette is endermatic. Jeanette is chapped. Jeanette is echt. Jeanette is roofless. Nealon is endermatic. Nealon is echt. Green, roofless things are bicuspid. All useable things are absent. If something is echt then it is useable. Torrie is not bicuspid.", "logic": "\nChapped(torrie)\nEcht(torrie)\nRoofless(torrie)\nAbsent(jeanette)\nEndermatic(jeanette)\nChapped(jeanette)\nEcht(jeanette)\nRoofless(jeanette)\nEndermatic(nealon)\nEcht(nealon)\nforall x (Absent(x) and Roofless(x) -> Bicuspid(x))\nforall x (Useable(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Echt(x) -> Useable(x))\n\nnot Bicuspid(torrie)\n\nEcht(torrie) and forall x (Echt(x) -> Useable(x)) -> therefore Useable(torrie) Useable(torrie) and forall x (Useable(x) -> Absent(x)) -> therefore Absent(torrie) Absent(torrie) and Roofless(torrie) and forall x (Absent(x) and Roofless(x) -> Bicuspid(x)) -> therefore Bicuspid(torrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Urbano is married. Urbano is false. Urbano is aramean. Thelma is dwindling. Thelma is unmixable. Thelma is married. Thelma is false. Thelma is aramean. Zorah is unmixable. Zorah is false. Green, aramean things are tragical. All serpentine things are dwindling. If something is false then it is serpentine. Zorah is not tragical.", "logic": "\nMarried(urbano)\nFalse(urbano)\nAramean(urbano)\nDwindling(thelma)\nUnmixable(thelma)\nMarried(thelma)\nFalse(thelma)\nAramean(thelma)\nUnmixable(zorah)\nFalse(zorah)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Aramean(x) -> Tragical(x))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nforall x (False(x) -> Serpentine(x))\n\nnot Tragical(zorah)\n\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Aramean(x) -> Tragical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Ninette is concrete. Ninette is treeless. Ninette is malay. Ossie is guileless. Ossie is reflexive. Ossie is concrete. Ossie is treeless. Ossie is malay. Ward is reflexive. Ward is treeless. Green, malay things are dactylic. All bankrupt things are guileless. If something is treeless then it is bankrupt. Ward is malay.", "logic": "\nConcrete(ninette)\nTreeless(ninette)\nMalay(ninette)\nGuileless(ossie)\nReflexive(ossie)\nConcrete(ossie)\nTreeless(ossie)\nMalay(ossie)\nReflexive(ward)\nTreeless(ward)\nforall x (Guileless(x) and Malay(x) -> Dactylic(x))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\n\nMalay(ward)\n\nMalay(ward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Myrtle is gusty. Myrtle is nurturant. Myrtle is despicable. Renard is precative. Renard is pediatric. Renard is gusty. Renard is nurturant. Renard is despicable. Pepillo is pediatric. Pepillo is nurturant. Green, despicable things are vengeful. All acute things are precative. If something is nurturant then it is acute. Pepillo is not gusty.", "logic": "\nGusty(myrtle)\nNurturant(myrtle)\nDespicable(myrtle)\nPrecative(renard)\nPediatric(renard)\nGusty(renard)\nNurturant(renard)\nDespicable(renard)\nPediatric(pepillo)\nNurturant(pepillo)\nforall x (Precative(x) and Despicable(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Precative(x))\nforall x (Nurturant(x) -> Acute(x))\n\nnot Gusty(pepillo)\n\nnot Gusty(pepillo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "Lacie is gangly. Lacie is lenitive. Lacie is sincere. Meggan is dextral. Meggan is illegible. Meggan is gangly. Meggan is lenitive. Meggan is sincere. Gwendolyn is illegible. Gwendolyn is lenitive. Green, sincere things are incessant. All homosexual things are dextral. If something is lenitive then it is homosexual. Lacie is illegible.", "logic": "\nGangly(lacie)\nLenitive(lacie)\nSincere(lacie)\nDextral(meggan)\nIllegible(meggan)\nGangly(meggan)\nLenitive(meggan)\nSincere(meggan)\nIllegible(gwendolyn)\nLenitive(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Dextral(x) and Sincere(x) -> Incessant(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Dextral(x))\nforall x (Lenitive(x) -> Homosexual(x))\n\nIllegible(lacie)\n\nIllegible(lacie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-622"} {"premises": "The marrilee grave the eleonora. The marrilee lavish the kaleb. The eleonora grave the kaleb. The kaleb grave the eleonora. The kaleb lavish the marrilee. The kaleb lavish the eleonora. The kaleb fodder the marrilee. If something is mere then it lavish the kaleb. If something lavish the eleonora and the eleonora grave the marrilee then it fodder the eleonora. If something lavish the eleonora then the eleonora fodder the kaleb. If something lavish the eleonora then the eleonora fodder the kaleb. If something fodder the kaleb and the kaleb lavish the eleonora then the eleonora is mere. If the eleonora is stylized and the eleonora grave the kaleb then the kaleb is warlike. If something is mere and it fodder the marrilee then it fodder the eleonora. If something fodder the marrilee then it grave the marrilee. The eleonora grave the kaleb.", "logic": "\nGrave(marrilee, eleonora)\nLavish(marrilee, kaleb)\nGrave(eleonora, kaleb)\nGrave(kaleb, eleonora)\nLavish(kaleb, marrilee)\nLavish(kaleb, eleonora)\nFodder(kaleb, marrilee)\nforall x (Mere(x) -> Lavish(x, kaleb))\nforall x (Lavish(x, eleonora) and Grave(eleonora, marrilee) -> Fodder(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Lavish(x, eleonora) -> Fodder(eleonora, kaleb))\nforall x (Lavish(x, eleonora) -> Fodder(eleonora, kaleb))\nforall x (Fodder(x, kaleb) and Lavish(kaleb, eleonora) -> Mere(eleonora))\nStylized(eleonora) and Grave(eleonora, kaleb) -> Warlike(kaleb)\nforall x (Mere(x) and Fodder(x, marrilee) -> Fodder(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Fodder(x, marrilee) -> Grave(x, marrilee))\n\nGrave(eleonora, kaleb)\n\ntherefore Grave(eleonora, kaleb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The verna yell the stephine. The verna worship the clarie. The stephine yell the clarie. The clarie yell the stephine. The clarie worship the verna. The clarie worship the stephine. The clarie grouch the verna. If something is spanish then it worship the clarie. If something worship the stephine and the stephine yell the verna then it grouch the stephine. If something worship the stephine then the stephine grouch the clarie. If something worship the stephine then the stephine grouch the clarie. If something grouch the clarie and the clarie worship the stephine then the stephine is spanish. If the stephine is mothy and the stephine yell the clarie then the clarie is glittering. If something is spanish and it grouch the verna then it grouch the stephine. If something grouch the verna then it yell the verna. The stephine does not eat the clarie.", "logic": "\nYell(verna, stephine)\nWorship(verna, clarie)\nYell(stephine, clarie)\nYell(clarie, stephine)\nWorship(clarie, verna)\nWorship(clarie, stephine)\nGrouch(clarie, verna)\nforall x (Spanish(x) -> Worship(x, clarie))\nforall x (Worship(x, stephine) and Yell(stephine, verna) -> Grouch(x, stephine))\nforall x (Worship(x, stephine) -> Grouch(stephine, clarie))\nforall x (Worship(x, stephine) -> Grouch(stephine, clarie))\nforall x (Grouch(x, clarie) and Worship(clarie, stephine) -> Spanish(stephine))\nMothy(stephine) and Yell(stephine, clarie) -> Glittering(clarie)\nforall x (Spanish(x) and Grouch(x, verna) -> Grouch(x, stephine))\nforall x (Grouch(x, verna) -> Yell(x, verna))\n\nnot Yell(stephine, clarie)\n\ntherefore Yell(stephine, clarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The harriett cook the dorothea. The harriett fragment the hadley. The dorothea cook the hadley. The hadley cook the dorothea. The hadley fragment the harriett. The hadley fragment the dorothea. The hadley sallow the harriett. If something is rocky then it fragment the hadley. If something fragment the dorothea and the dorothea cook the harriett then it sallow the dorothea. If something fragment the dorothea then the dorothea sallow the hadley. If something fragment the dorothea then the dorothea sallow the hadley. If something sallow the hadley and the hadley fragment the dorothea then the dorothea is rocky. If the dorothea is fallacious and the dorothea cook the hadley then the hadley is linguistic. If something is rocky and it sallow the harriett then it sallow the dorothea. If something sallow the harriett then it cook the harriett. The hadley cook the harriett.", "logic": "\nCook(harriett, dorothea)\nFragment(harriett, hadley)\nCook(dorothea, hadley)\nCook(hadley, dorothea)\nFragment(hadley, harriett)\nFragment(hadley, dorothea)\nSallow(hadley, harriett)\nforall x (Rocky(x) -> Fragment(x, hadley))\nforall x (Fragment(x, dorothea) and Cook(dorothea, harriett) -> Sallow(x, dorothea))\nforall x (Fragment(x, dorothea) -> Sallow(dorothea, hadley))\nforall x (Fragment(x, dorothea) -> Sallow(dorothea, hadley))\nforall x (Sallow(x, hadley) and Fragment(hadley, dorothea) -> Rocky(dorothea))\nFallacious(dorothea) and Cook(dorothea, hadley) -> Linguistic(hadley)\nforall x (Rocky(x) and Sallow(x, harriett) -> Sallow(x, dorothea))\nforall x (Sallow(x, harriett) -> Cook(x, harriett))\n\nCook(hadley, harriett)\n\nSallow(hadley, harriett) and forall x (Sallow(x, harriett) -> Cook(x, harriett)) -> therefore Cook(hadley, harriett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The ardella maim the delly. The ardella telex the betti. The delly maim the betti. The betti maim the delly. The betti telex the ardella. The betti telex the delly. The betti dwarf the ardella. If something is fallacious then it telex the betti. If something telex the delly and the delly maim the ardella then it dwarf the delly. If something telex the delly then the delly dwarf the betti. If something telex the delly then the delly dwarf the betti. If something dwarf the betti and the betti telex the delly then the delly is fallacious. If the delly is fluky and the delly maim the betti then the betti is correlate. If something is fallacious and it dwarf the ardella then it dwarf the delly. If something dwarf the ardella then it maim the ardella. The betti does not eat the ardella.", "logic": "\nMaim(ardella, delly)\nTelex(ardella, betti)\nMaim(delly, betti)\nMaim(betti, delly)\nTelex(betti, ardella)\nTelex(betti, delly)\nDwarf(betti, ardella)\nforall x (Fallacious(x) -> Telex(x, betti))\nforall x (Telex(x, delly) and Maim(delly, ardella) -> Dwarf(x, delly))\nforall x (Telex(x, delly) -> Dwarf(delly, betti))\nforall x (Telex(x, delly) -> Dwarf(delly, betti))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, betti) and Telex(betti, delly) -> Fallacious(delly))\nFluky(delly) and Maim(delly, betti) -> Correlate(betti)\nforall x (Fallacious(x) and Dwarf(x, ardella) -> Dwarf(x, delly))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, ardella) -> Maim(x, ardella))\n\nnot Maim(betti, ardella)\n\nDwarf(betti, ardella) and forall x (Dwarf(x, ardella) -> Maim(x, ardella)) -> therefore Maim(betti, ardella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The marie virilise the jacquie. The marie carnalise the mathilda. The jacquie virilise the mathilda. The mathilda virilise the jacquie. The mathilda carnalise the marie. The mathilda carnalise the jacquie. The mathilda rick the marie. If something is dumpy then it carnalise the mathilda. If something carnalise the jacquie and the jacquie virilise the marie then it rick the jacquie. If something carnalise the jacquie then the jacquie rick the mathilda. If something carnalise the jacquie then the jacquie rick the mathilda. If something rick the mathilda and the mathilda carnalise the jacquie then the jacquie is dumpy. If the jacquie is imbalanced and the jacquie virilise the mathilda then the mathilda is sandaled. If something is dumpy and it rick the marie then it rick the jacquie. If something rick the marie then it virilise the marie. The jacquie is dumpy.", "logic": "\nVirilise(marie, jacquie)\nCarnalise(marie, mathilda)\nVirilise(jacquie, mathilda)\nVirilise(mathilda, jacquie)\nCarnalise(mathilda, marie)\nCarnalise(mathilda, jacquie)\nRick(mathilda, marie)\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Carnalise(x, mathilda))\nforall x (Carnalise(x, jacquie) and Virilise(jacquie, marie) -> Rick(x, jacquie))\nforall x (Carnalise(x, jacquie) -> Rick(jacquie, mathilda))\nforall x (Carnalise(x, jacquie) -> Rick(jacquie, mathilda))\nforall x (Rick(x, mathilda) and Carnalise(mathilda, jacquie) -> Dumpy(jacquie))\nImbalanced(jacquie) and Virilise(jacquie, mathilda) -> Sandaled(mathilda)\nforall x (Dumpy(x) and Rick(x, marie) -> Rick(x, jacquie))\nforall x (Rick(x, marie) -> Virilise(x, marie))\n\nDumpy(jacquie)\n\nCarnalise(mathilda, jacquie) and forall x (Carnalise(x, jacquie) -> Rick(jacquie, mathilda)) -> therefore Rick(jacquie, mathilda) Rick(jacquie, mathilda) and Carnalise(mathilda, jacquie) and forall x (Rick(x, mathilda) and Carnalise(mathilda, jacquie) -> Dumpy(jacquie)) -> therefore Dumpy(jacquie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The greg transgress the gayle. The greg preclude the elvin. The gayle transgress the elvin. The elvin transgress the gayle. The elvin preclude the greg. The elvin preclude the gayle. The elvin glance the greg. If something is futurist then it preclude the elvin. If something preclude the gayle and the gayle transgress the greg then it glance the gayle. If something preclude the gayle then the gayle glance the elvin. If something preclude the gayle then the gayle glance the elvin. If something glance the elvin and the elvin preclude the gayle then the gayle is futurist. If the gayle is defunct and the gayle transgress the elvin then the elvin is corrosive. If something is futurist and it glance the greg then it glance the gayle. If something glance the greg then it transgress the greg. The gayle is not futurist.", "logic": "\nTransgress(greg, gayle)\nPreclude(greg, elvin)\nTransgress(gayle, elvin)\nTransgress(elvin, gayle)\nPreclude(elvin, greg)\nPreclude(elvin, gayle)\nGlance(elvin, greg)\nforall x (Futurist(x) -> Preclude(x, elvin))\nforall x (Preclude(x, gayle) and Transgress(gayle, greg) -> Glance(x, gayle))\nforall x (Preclude(x, gayle) -> Glance(gayle, elvin))\nforall x (Preclude(x, gayle) -> Glance(gayle, elvin))\nforall x (Glance(x, elvin) and Preclude(elvin, gayle) -> Futurist(gayle))\nDefunct(gayle) and Transgress(gayle, elvin) -> Corrosive(elvin)\nforall x (Futurist(x) and Glance(x, greg) -> Glance(x, gayle))\nforall x (Glance(x, greg) -> Transgress(x, greg))\n\nnot Futurist(gayle)\n\nPreclude(elvin, gayle) and forall x (Preclude(x, gayle) -> Glance(gayle, elvin)) -> therefore Glance(gayle, elvin) Glance(gayle, elvin) and Preclude(elvin, gayle) and forall x (Glance(x, elvin) and Preclude(elvin, gayle) -> Futurist(gayle)) -> therefore Futurist(gayle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The marleah moor the genny. The marleah jack the brent. The genny moor the brent. The brent moor the genny. The brent jack the marleah. The brent jack the genny. The brent grumble the marleah. If something is toothy then it jack the brent. If something jack the genny and the genny moor the marleah then it grumble the genny. If something jack the genny then the genny grumble the brent. If something jack the genny then the genny grumble the brent. If something grumble the brent and the brent jack the genny then the genny is toothy. If the genny is conforming and the genny moor the brent then the brent is oxidizable. If something is toothy and it grumble the marleah then it grumble the genny. If something grumble the marleah then it moor the marleah. The genny jack the brent.", "logic": "\nMoor(marleah, genny)\nJack(marleah, brent)\nMoor(genny, brent)\nMoor(brent, genny)\nJack(brent, marleah)\nJack(brent, genny)\nGrumble(brent, marleah)\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Jack(x, brent))\nforall x (Jack(x, genny) and Moor(genny, marleah) -> Grumble(x, genny))\nforall x (Jack(x, genny) -> Grumble(genny, brent))\nforall x (Jack(x, genny) -> Grumble(genny, brent))\nforall x (Grumble(x, brent) and Jack(brent, genny) -> Toothy(genny))\nConforming(genny) and Moor(genny, brent) -> Oxidizable(brent)\nforall x (Toothy(x) and Grumble(x, marleah) -> Grumble(x, genny))\nforall x (Grumble(x, marleah) -> Moor(x, marleah))\n\nJack(genny, brent)\n\nJack(brent, genny) and forall x (Jack(x, genny) -> Grumble(genny, brent)) -> therefore Grumble(genny, brent) Grumble(genny, brent) and Jack(brent, genny) and forall x (Grumble(x, brent) and Jack(brent, genny) -> Toothy(genny)) -> therefore Toothy(genny) Toothy(genny) and forall x (Toothy(x) -> Jack(x, brent)) -> therefore Jack(genny, brent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The stormi average the beatrisa. The stormi cuddle the ofella. The beatrisa average the ofella. The ofella average the beatrisa. The ofella cuddle the stormi. The ofella cuddle the beatrisa. The ofella flame the stormi. If something is inerrant then it cuddle the ofella. If something cuddle the beatrisa and the beatrisa average the stormi then it flame the beatrisa. If something cuddle the beatrisa then the beatrisa flame the ofella. If something cuddle the beatrisa then the beatrisa flame the ofella. If something flame the ofella and the ofella cuddle the beatrisa then the beatrisa is inerrant. If the beatrisa is proustian and the beatrisa average the ofella then the ofella is ambulatory. If something is inerrant and it flame the stormi then it flame the beatrisa. If something flame the stormi then it average the stormi. The beatrisa does not like the ofella.", "logic": "\nAverage(stormi, beatrisa)\nCuddle(stormi, ofella)\nAverage(beatrisa, ofella)\nAverage(ofella, beatrisa)\nCuddle(ofella, stormi)\nCuddle(ofella, beatrisa)\nFlame(ofella, stormi)\nforall x (Inerrant(x) -> Cuddle(x, ofella))\nforall x (Cuddle(x, beatrisa) and Average(beatrisa, stormi) -> Flame(x, beatrisa))\nforall x (Cuddle(x, beatrisa) -> Flame(beatrisa, ofella))\nforall x (Cuddle(x, beatrisa) -> Flame(beatrisa, ofella))\nforall x (Flame(x, ofella) and Cuddle(ofella, beatrisa) -> Inerrant(beatrisa))\nProustian(beatrisa) and Average(beatrisa, ofella) -> Ambulatory(ofella)\nforall x (Inerrant(x) and Flame(x, stormi) -> Flame(x, beatrisa))\nforall x (Flame(x, stormi) -> Average(x, stormi))\n\nnot Cuddle(beatrisa, ofella)\n\nCuddle(ofella, beatrisa) and forall x (Cuddle(x, beatrisa) -> Flame(beatrisa, ofella)) -> therefore Flame(beatrisa, ofella) Flame(beatrisa, ofella) and Cuddle(ofella, beatrisa) and forall x (Flame(x, ofella) and Cuddle(ofella, beatrisa) -> Inerrant(beatrisa)) -> therefore Inerrant(beatrisa) Inerrant(beatrisa) and forall x (Inerrant(x) -> Cuddle(x, ofella)) -> therefore Cuddle(beatrisa, ofella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The cesya cudgel the gilbert. The cesya metal the delilah. The gilbert cudgel the delilah. The delilah cudgel the gilbert. The delilah metal the cesya. The delilah metal the gilbert. The delilah behead the cesya. If something is unavailing then it metal the delilah. If something metal the gilbert and the gilbert cudgel the cesya then it behead the gilbert. If something metal the gilbert then the gilbert behead the delilah. If something metal the gilbert then the gilbert behead the delilah. If something behead the delilah and the delilah metal the gilbert then the gilbert is unavailing. If the gilbert is south and the gilbert cudgel the delilah then the delilah is unremarked. If something is unavailing and it behead the cesya then it behead the gilbert. If something behead the cesya then it cudgel the cesya. The delilah is not unremarked.", "logic": "\nCudgel(cesya, gilbert)\nMetal(cesya, delilah)\nCudgel(gilbert, delilah)\nCudgel(delilah, gilbert)\nMetal(delilah, cesya)\nMetal(delilah, gilbert)\nBehead(delilah, cesya)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Metal(x, delilah))\nforall x (Metal(x, gilbert) and Cudgel(gilbert, cesya) -> Behead(x, gilbert))\nforall x (Metal(x, gilbert) -> Behead(gilbert, delilah))\nforall x (Metal(x, gilbert) -> Behead(gilbert, delilah))\nforall x (Behead(x, delilah) and Metal(delilah, gilbert) -> Unavailing(gilbert))\nSouth(gilbert) and Cudgel(gilbert, delilah) -> Unremarked(delilah)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) and Behead(x, cesya) -> Behead(x, gilbert))\nforall x (Behead(x, cesya) -> Cudgel(x, cesya))\n\nnot Unremarked(delilah)\n\nSouth(gilbert) and Cudgel(gilbert, delilah) -> Unremarked(delilah) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The danell abide the lynnet. The danell soothe the kerstin. The lynnet abide the kerstin. The kerstin abide the lynnet. The kerstin soothe the danell. The kerstin soothe the lynnet. The kerstin recruit the danell. If something is ascendant then it soothe the kerstin. If something soothe the lynnet and the lynnet abide the danell then it recruit the lynnet. If something soothe the lynnet then the lynnet recruit the kerstin. If something soothe the lynnet then the lynnet recruit the kerstin. If something recruit the kerstin and the kerstin soothe the lynnet then the lynnet is ascendant. If the lynnet is subaltern and the lynnet abide the kerstin then the kerstin is bullish. If something is ascendant and it recruit the danell then it recruit the lynnet. If something recruit the danell then it abide the danell. The lynnet abide the danell.", "logic": "\nAbide(danell, lynnet)\nSoothe(danell, kerstin)\nAbide(lynnet, kerstin)\nAbide(kerstin, lynnet)\nSoothe(kerstin, danell)\nSoothe(kerstin, lynnet)\nRecruit(kerstin, danell)\nforall x (Ascendant(x) -> Soothe(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Soothe(x, lynnet) and Abide(lynnet, danell) -> Recruit(x, lynnet))\nforall x (Soothe(x, lynnet) -> Recruit(lynnet, kerstin))\nforall x (Soothe(x, lynnet) -> Recruit(lynnet, kerstin))\nforall x (Recruit(x, kerstin) and Soothe(kerstin, lynnet) -> Ascendant(lynnet))\nSubaltern(lynnet) and Abide(lynnet, kerstin) -> Bullish(kerstin)\nforall x (Ascendant(x) and Recruit(x, danell) -> Recruit(x, lynnet))\nforall x (Recruit(x, danell) -> Abide(x, danell))\n\nAbide(lynnet, danell)\n\nforall x (Recruit(x, danell) -> Abide(x, danell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The kally effectuate the wilhelm. The kally expound the ingaberg. The wilhelm effectuate the ingaberg. The ingaberg effectuate the wilhelm. The ingaberg expound the kally. The ingaberg expound the wilhelm. The ingaberg holystone the kally. If something is hircine then it expound the ingaberg. If something expound the wilhelm and the wilhelm effectuate the kally then it holystone the wilhelm. If something expound the wilhelm then the wilhelm holystone the ingaberg. If something expound the wilhelm then the wilhelm holystone the ingaberg. If something holystone the ingaberg and the ingaberg expound the wilhelm then the wilhelm is hircine. If the wilhelm is responsive and the wilhelm effectuate the ingaberg then the ingaberg is carmelite. If something is hircine and it holystone the kally then it holystone the wilhelm. If something holystone the kally then it effectuate the kally. The wilhelm does not need the wilhelm.", "logic": "\nEffectuate(kally, wilhelm)\nExpound(kally, ingaberg)\nEffectuate(wilhelm, ingaberg)\nEffectuate(ingaberg, wilhelm)\nExpound(ingaberg, kally)\nExpound(ingaberg, wilhelm)\nHolystone(ingaberg, kally)\nforall x (Hircine(x) -> Expound(x, ingaberg))\nforall x (Expound(x, wilhelm) and Effectuate(wilhelm, kally) -> Holystone(x, wilhelm))\nforall x (Expound(x, wilhelm) -> Holystone(wilhelm, ingaberg))\nforall x (Expound(x, wilhelm) -> Holystone(wilhelm, ingaberg))\nforall x (Holystone(x, ingaberg) and Expound(ingaberg, wilhelm) -> Hircine(wilhelm))\nResponsive(wilhelm) and Effectuate(wilhelm, ingaberg) -> Carmelite(ingaberg)\nforall x (Hircine(x) and Holystone(x, kally) -> Holystone(x, wilhelm))\nforall x (Holystone(x, kally) -> Effectuate(x, kally))\n\nnot Holystone(wilhelm, wilhelm)\n\nforall x (Expound(x, wilhelm) and Effectuate(wilhelm, kally) -> Holystone(x, wilhelm)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The zerk hydrolyze the koressa. The zerk prise the rockwell. The koressa hydrolyze the rockwell. The rockwell hydrolyze the koressa. The rockwell prise the zerk. The rockwell prise the koressa. The rockwell pantomime the zerk. If something is arbitrable then it prise the rockwell. If something prise the koressa and the koressa hydrolyze the zerk then it pantomime the koressa. If something prise the koressa then the koressa pantomime the rockwell. If something prise the koressa then the koressa pantomime the rockwell. If something pantomime the rockwell and the rockwell prise the koressa then the koressa is arbitrable. If the koressa is ironed and the koressa hydrolyze the rockwell then the rockwell is truthful. If something is arbitrable and it pantomime the zerk then it pantomime the koressa. If something pantomime the zerk then it hydrolyze the zerk. The zerk pantomime the koressa.", "logic": "\nHydrolyze(zerk, koressa)\nPrise(zerk, rockwell)\nHydrolyze(koressa, rockwell)\nHydrolyze(rockwell, koressa)\nPrise(rockwell, zerk)\nPrise(rockwell, koressa)\nPantomime(rockwell, zerk)\nforall x (Arbitrable(x) -> Prise(x, rockwell))\nforall x (Prise(x, koressa) and Hydrolyze(koressa, zerk) -> Pantomime(x, koressa))\nforall x (Prise(x, koressa) -> Pantomime(koressa, rockwell))\nforall x (Prise(x, koressa) -> Pantomime(koressa, rockwell))\nforall x (Pantomime(x, rockwell) and Prise(rockwell, koressa) -> Arbitrable(koressa))\nIroned(koressa) and Hydrolyze(koressa, rockwell) -> Truthful(rockwell)\nforall x (Arbitrable(x) and Pantomime(x, zerk) -> Pantomime(x, koressa))\nforall x (Pantomime(x, zerk) -> Hydrolyze(x, zerk))\n\nPantomime(zerk, koressa)\n\nforall x (Prise(x, koressa) and Hydrolyze(koressa, zerk) -> Pantomime(x, koressa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The sianna shift the thaddius. The sianna stem the aleda. The thaddius shift the aleda. The aleda shift the thaddius. The aleda stem the sianna. The aleda stem the thaddius. The aleda bait the sianna. If something is irregular then it stem the aleda. If something stem the thaddius and the thaddius shift the sianna then it bait the thaddius. If something stem the thaddius then the thaddius bait the aleda. If something stem the thaddius then the thaddius bait the aleda. If something bait the aleda and the aleda stem the thaddius then the thaddius is irregular. If the thaddius is aldermanic and the thaddius shift the aleda then the aleda is parented. If something is irregular and it bait the sianna then it bait the thaddius. If something bait the sianna then it shift the sianna. The sianna is not aldermanic.", "logic": "\nShift(sianna, thaddius)\nStem(sianna, aleda)\nShift(thaddius, aleda)\nShift(aleda, thaddius)\nStem(aleda, sianna)\nStem(aleda, thaddius)\nBait(aleda, sianna)\nforall x (Irregular(x) -> Stem(x, aleda))\nforall x (Stem(x, thaddius) and Shift(thaddius, sianna) -> Bait(x, thaddius))\nforall x (Stem(x, thaddius) -> Bait(thaddius, aleda))\nforall x (Stem(x, thaddius) -> Bait(thaddius, aleda))\nforall x (Bait(x, aleda) and Stem(aleda, thaddius) -> Irregular(thaddius))\nAldermanic(thaddius) and Shift(thaddius, aleda) -> Parented(aleda)\nforall x (Irregular(x) and Bait(x, sianna) -> Bait(x, thaddius))\nforall x (Bait(x, sianna) -> Shift(x, sianna))\n\nnot Aldermanic(sianna)\n\nnot Aldermanic(sianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The israel argue the nathan. The israel winterise the christyna. The nathan argue the christyna. The christyna argue the nathan. The christyna winterise the israel. The christyna winterise the nathan. The christyna coeducate the israel. If something is stabilised then it winterise the christyna. If something winterise the nathan and the nathan argue the israel then it coeducate the nathan. If something winterise the nathan then the nathan coeducate the christyna. If something winterise the nathan then the nathan coeducate the christyna. If something coeducate the christyna and the christyna winterise the nathan then the nathan is stabilised. If the nathan is virtual and the nathan argue the christyna then the christyna is missional. If something is stabilised and it coeducate the israel then it coeducate the nathan. If something coeducate the israel then it argue the israel. The israel is rough.", "logic": "\nArgue(israel, nathan)\nWinterise(israel, christyna)\nArgue(nathan, christyna)\nArgue(christyna, nathan)\nWinterise(christyna, israel)\nWinterise(christyna, nathan)\nCoeducate(christyna, israel)\nforall x (Stabilised(x) -> Winterise(x, christyna))\nforall x (Winterise(x, nathan) and Argue(nathan, israel) -> Coeducate(x, nathan))\nforall x (Winterise(x, nathan) -> Coeducate(nathan, christyna))\nforall x (Winterise(x, nathan) -> Coeducate(nathan, christyna))\nforall x (Coeducate(x, christyna) and Winterise(christyna, nathan) -> Stabilised(nathan))\nVirtual(nathan) and Argue(nathan, christyna) -> Missional(christyna)\nforall x (Stabilised(x) and Coeducate(x, israel) -> Coeducate(x, nathan))\nforall x (Coeducate(x, israel) -> Argue(x, israel))\n\nRough(israel)\n\nRough(israel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The fulvia abduce the robenia. The fulvia deliquesce the naoma. The robenia abduce the naoma. The naoma abduce the robenia. The naoma deliquesce the fulvia. The naoma deliquesce the robenia. The naoma spool the fulvia. If something is intragroup then it deliquesce the naoma. If something deliquesce the robenia and the robenia abduce the fulvia then it spool the robenia. If something deliquesce the robenia then the robenia spool the naoma. If something deliquesce the robenia then the robenia spool the naoma. If something spool the naoma and the naoma deliquesce the robenia then the robenia is intragroup. If the robenia is maddened and the robenia abduce the naoma then the naoma is noteworthy. If something is intragroup and it spool the fulvia then it spool the robenia. If something spool the fulvia then it abduce the fulvia. The naoma is not intragroup.", "logic": "\nAbduce(fulvia, robenia)\nDeliquesce(fulvia, naoma)\nAbduce(robenia, naoma)\nAbduce(naoma, robenia)\nDeliquesce(naoma, fulvia)\nDeliquesce(naoma, robenia)\nSpool(naoma, fulvia)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) -> Deliquesce(x, naoma))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, robenia) and Abduce(robenia, fulvia) -> Spool(x, robenia))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, robenia) -> Spool(robenia, naoma))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, robenia) -> Spool(robenia, naoma))\nforall x (Spool(x, naoma) and Deliquesce(naoma, robenia) -> Intragroup(robenia))\nMaddened(robenia) and Abduce(robenia, naoma) -> Noteworthy(naoma)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) and Spool(x, fulvia) -> Spool(x, robenia))\nforall x (Spool(x, fulvia) -> Abduce(x, fulvia))\n\nnot Intragroup(naoma)\n\nnot Intragroup(naoma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "The elyssa descend the carolynn. The elyssa churr the rodd. The carolynn descend the rodd. The rodd descend the carolynn. The rodd churr the elyssa. The rodd churr the carolynn. The rodd censure the elyssa. If something is coenobitic then it churr the rodd. If something churr the carolynn and the carolynn descend the elyssa then it censure the carolynn. If something churr the carolynn then the carolynn censure the rodd. If something churr the carolynn then the carolynn censure the rodd. If something censure the rodd and the rodd churr the carolynn then the carolynn is coenobitic. If the carolynn is burlesque and the carolynn descend the rodd then the rodd is agential. If something is coenobitic and it censure the elyssa then it censure the carolynn. If something censure the elyssa then it descend the elyssa. The rodd is rough.", "logic": "\nDescend(elyssa, carolynn)\nChurr(elyssa, rodd)\nDescend(carolynn, rodd)\nDescend(rodd, carolynn)\nChurr(rodd, elyssa)\nChurr(rodd, carolynn)\nCensure(rodd, elyssa)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Churr(x, rodd))\nforall x (Churr(x, carolynn) and Descend(carolynn, elyssa) -> Censure(x, carolynn))\nforall x (Churr(x, carolynn) -> Censure(carolynn, rodd))\nforall x (Churr(x, carolynn) -> Censure(carolynn, rodd))\nforall x (Censure(x, rodd) and Churr(rodd, carolynn) -> Coenobitic(carolynn))\nBurlesque(carolynn) and Descend(carolynn, rodd) -> Agential(rodd)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) and Censure(x, elyssa) -> Censure(x, carolynn))\nforall x (Censure(x, elyssa) -> Descend(x, elyssa))\n\nRough(rodd)\n\nRough(rodd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Amie is dickey. Amie is ugly. Arne is palatine. Arne is ugly. Sherie is puff. Sherie is anaclinal. Sherie is thenar. White people are palatine. Round people are inclined. If Sherie is anaclinal then Sherie is thenar. If Amie is anaclinal then Amie is thenar. If Amie is dickey and Amie is inclined then Amie is thenar. All puff, ugly people are inclined. Sherie is puff.", "logic": "\nDickey(amie)\nUgly(amie)\nPalatine(arne)\nUgly(arne)\nPuff(sherie)\nAnaclinal(sherie)\nThenar(sherie)\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) -> Inclined(x))\nAnaclinal(sherie) -> Thenar(sherie)\nAnaclinal(amie) -> Thenar(amie)\nDickey(amie) and Inclined(amie) -> Thenar(amie)\nforall x (Puff(x) and Ugly(x) -> Inclined(x))\n\nPuff(sherie)\n\ntherefore Puff(sherie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Reggie is pasteurian. Reggie is supportive. Wat is irreverent. Wat is supportive. Fraser is tormented. Fraser is soulless. Fraser is southbound. White people are irreverent. Round people are comburant. If Fraser is soulless then Fraser is southbound. If Reggie is soulless then Reggie is southbound. If Reggie is pasteurian and Reggie is comburant then Reggie is southbound. All tormented, supportive people are comburant. Fraser is not tormented.", "logic": "\nPasteurian(reggie)\nSupportive(reggie)\nIrreverent(wat)\nSupportive(wat)\nTormented(fraser)\nSoulless(fraser)\nSouthbound(fraser)\nforall x (Southbound(x) -> Irreverent(x))\nforall x (Pasteurian(x) -> Comburant(x))\nSoulless(fraser) -> Southbound(fraser)\nSoulless(reggie) -> Southbound(reggie)\nPasteurian(reggie) and Comburant(reggie) -> Southbound(reggie)\nforall x (Tormented(x) and Supportive(x) -> Comburant(x))\n\nnot Tormented(fraser)\n\ntherefore Tormented(fraser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Worthy is appetent. Worthy is knowing. Pincus is bifoliate. Pincus is knowing. Xenos is isolated. Xenos is undersexed. Xenos is nubby. White people are bifoliate. Round people are unfeminine. If Xenos is undersexed then Xenos is nubby. If Worthy is undersexed then Worthy is nubby. If Worthy is appetent and Worthy is unfeminine then Worthy is nubby. All isolated, knowing people are unfeminine. Xenos is bifoliate.", "logic": "\nAppetent(worthy)\nKnowing(worthy)\nBifoliate(pincus)\nKnowing(pincus)\nIsolated(xenos)\nUndersexed(xenos)\nNubby(xenos)\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Appetent(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nUndersexed(xenos) -> Nubby(xenos)\nUndersexed(worthy) -> Nubby(worthy)\nAppetent(worthy) and Unfeminine(worthy) -> Nubby(worthy)\nforall x (Isolated(x) and Knowing(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\n\nBifoliate(xenos)\n\nNubby(xenos) and forall x (Nubby(x) -> Bifoliate(x)) -> therefore Bifoliate(xenos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Candra is glutted. Candra is dopey. Tiler is tenebrous. Tiler is dopey. Adrian is degrading. Adrian is brainsick. Adrian is ismaili. White people are tenebrous. Round people are palladian. If Adrian is brainsick then Adrian is ismaili. If Candra is brainsick then Candra is ismaili. If Candra is glutted and Candra is palladian then Candra is ismaili. All degrading, dopey people are palladian. Candra is not palladian.", "logic": "\nGlutted(candra)\nDopey(candra)\nTenebrous(tiler)\nDopey(tiler)\nDegrading(adrian)\nBrainsick(adrian)\nIsmaili(adrian)\nforall x (Ismaili(x) -> Tenebrous(x))\nforall x (Glutted(x) -> Palladian(x))\nBrainsick(adrian) -> Ismaili(adrian)\nBrainsick(candra) -> Ismaili(candra)\nGlutted(candra) and Palladian(candra) -> Ismaili(candra)\nforall x (Degrading(x) and Dopey(x) -> Palladian(x))\n\nnot Palladian(candra)\n\nGlutted(candra) and forall x (Glutted(x) -> Palladian(x)) -> therefore Palladian(candra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Calida is mercenary. Calida is oleaceous. Oralie is squashed. Oralie is oleaceous. Filide is slaveless. Filide is univocal. Filide is bacillary. White people are squashed. Round people are internal. If Filide is univocal then Filide is bacillary. If Calida is univocal then Calida is bacillary. If Calida is mercenary and Calida is internal then Calida is bacillary. All slaveless, oleaceous people are internal. Calida is bacillary.", "logic": "\nMercenary(calida)\nOleaceous(calida)\nSquashed(oralie)\nOleaceous(oralie)\nSlaveless(filide)\nUnivocal(filide)\nBacillary(filide)\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Mercenary(x) -> Internal(x))\nUnivocal(filide) -> Bacillary(filide)\nUnivocal(calida) -> Bacillary(calida)\nMercenary(calida) and Internal(calida) -> Bacillary(calida)\nforall x (Slaveless(x) and Oleaceous(x) -> Internal(x))\n\nBacillary(calida)\n\nMercenary(calida) and forall x (Mercenary(x) -> Internal(x)) -> therefore Internal(calida) Mercenary(calida) and Internal(calida) and Mercenary(calida) and Internal(calida) -> Bacillary(calida) -> therefore Bacillary(calida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Cresa is arbitral. Cresa is arty. Jamey is blown. Jamey is arty. Cletus is mesmerized. Cletus is eclectic. Cletus is inerrable. White people are blown. Round people are libidinous. If Cletus is eclectic then Cletus is inerrable. If Cresa is eclectic then Cresa is inerrable. If Cresa is arbitral and Cresa is libidinous then Cresa is inerrable. All mesmerized, arty people are libidinous. Cresa is not inerrable.", "logic": "\nArbitral(cresa)\nArty(cresa)\nBlown(jamey)\nArty(jamey)\nMesmerized(cletus)\nEclectic(cletus)\nInerrable(cletus)\nforall x (Inerrable(x) -> Blown(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nEclectic(cletus) -> Inerrable(cletus)\nEclectic(cresa) -> Inerrable(cresa)\nArbitral(cresa) and Libidinous(cresa) -> Inerrable(cresa)\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Arty(x) -> Libidinous(x))\n\nnot Inerrable(cresa)\n\nArbitral(cresa) and forall x (Arbitral(x) -> Libidinous(x)) -> therefore Libidinous(cresa) Arbitral(cresa) and Libidinous(cresa) and Arbitral(cresa) and Libidinous(cresa) -> Inerrable(cresa) -> therefore Inerrable(cresa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Lynda is stupendous. Lynda is cordiform. Elle is indwelling. Elle is cordiform. Terina is bobtail. Terina is unfueled. Terina is nutbrown. White people are indwelling. Round people are charmed. If Terina is unfueled then Terina is nutbrown. If Lynda is unfueled then Lynda is nutbrown. If Lynda is stupendous and Lynda is charmed then Lynda is nutbrown. All bobtail, cordiform people are charmed. Lynda is indwelling.", "logic": "\nStupendous(lynda)\nCordiform(lynda)\nIndwelling(elle)\nCordiform(elle)\nBobtail(terina)\nUnfueled(terina)\nNutbrown(terina)\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) -> Indwelling(x))\nforall x (Stupendous(x) -> Charmed(x))\nUnfueled(terina) -> Nutbrown(terina)\nUnfueled(lynda) -> Nutbrown(lynda)\nStupendous(lynda) and Charmed(lynda) -> Nutbrown(lynda)\nforall x (Bobtail(x) and Cordiform(x) -> Charmed(x))\n\nIndwelling(lynda)\n\nStupendous(lynda) and forall x (Stupendous(x) -> Charmed(x)) -> therefore Charmed(lynda) Stupendous(lynda) and Charmed(lynda) and Stupendous(lynda) and Charmed(lynda) -> Nutbrown(lynda) -> therefore Nutbrown(lynda) Nutbrown(lynda) and forall x (Nutbrown(x) -> Indwelling(x)) -> therefore Indwelling(lynda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Rosina is offbeat. Rosina is arrhythmic. Kally is tamil. Kally is arrhythmic. Collette is fungal. Collette is godly. Collette is reddish. White people are tamil. Round people are wigged. If Collette is godly then Collette is reddish. If Rosina is godly then Rosina is reddish. If Rosina is offbeat and Rosina is wigged then Rosina is reddish. All fungal, arrhythmic people are wigged. Rosina is not tamil.", "logic": "\nOffbeat(rosina)\nArrhythmic(rosina)\nTamil(kally)\nArrhythmic(kally)\nFungal(collette)\nGodly(collette)\nReddish(collette)\nforall x (Reddish(x) -> Tamil(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) -> Wigged(x))\nGodly(collette) -> Reddish(collette)\nGodly(rosina) -> Reddish(rosina)\nOffbeat(rosina) and Wigged(rosina) -> Reddish(rosina)\nforall x (Fungal(x) and Arrhythmic(x) -> Wigged(x))\n\nnot Tamil(rosina)\n\nOffbeat(rosina) and forall x (Offbeat(x) -> Wigged(x)) -> therefore Wigged(rosina) Offbeat(rosina) and Wigged(rosina) and Offbeat(rosina) and Wigged(rosina) -> Reddish(rosina) -> therefore Reddish(rosina) Reddish(rosina) and forall x (Reddish(x) -> Tamil(x)) -> therefore Tamil(rosina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Mollie is recurved. Mollie is blueish. Michell is edentulate. Michell is blueish. Fulton is methodist. Fulton is extropic. Fulton is figurative. White people are edentulate. Round people are strait. If Fulton is extropic then Fulton is figurative. If Mollie is extropic then Mollie is figurative. If Mollie is recurved and Mollie is strait then Mollie is figurative. All methodist, blueish people are strait. Fulton is not strait.", "logic": "\nRecurved(mollie)\nBlueish(mollie)\nEdentulate(michell)\nBlueish(michell)\nMethodist(fulton)\nExtropic(fulton)\nFigurative(fulton)\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) -> Strait(x))\nExtropic(fulton) -> Figurative(fulton)\nExtropic(mollie) -> Figurative(mollie)\nRecurved(mollie) and Strait(mollie) -> Figurative(mollie)\nforall x (Methodist(x) and Blueish(x) -> Strait(x))\n\nnot Strait(fulton)\n\nforall x (Recurved(x) -> Strait(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Fanya is fleshy. Fanya is ventral. Aurelia is thenal. Aurelia is ventral. George is unapparent. George is unsexed. George is myalgic. White people are thenal. Round people are sequined. If George is unsexed then George is myalgic. If Fanya is unsexed then Fanya is myalgic. If Fanya is fleshy and Fanya is sequined then Fanya is myalgic. All unapparent, ventral people are sequined. Aurelia is sequined.", "logic": "\nFleshy(fanya)\nVentral(fanya)\nThenal(aurelia)\nVentral(aurelia)\nUnapparent(george)\nUnsexed(george)\nMyalgic(george)\nforall x (Myalgic(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Sequined(x))\nUnsexed(george) -> Myalgic(george)\nUnsexed(fanya) -> Myalgic(fanya)\nFleshy(fanya) and Sequined(fanya) -> Myalgic(fanya)\nforall x (Unapparent(x) and Ventral(x) -> Sequined(x))\n\nSequined(aurelia)\n\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Sequined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Oralle is donatist. Oralle is caller. Ralina is norse. Ralina is caller. Jose is hired. Jose is thirsty. Jose is mongol. White people are norse. Round people are dire. If Jose is thirsty then Jose is mongol. If Oralle is thirsty then Oralle is mongol. If Oralle is donatist and Oralle is dire then Oralle is mongol. All hired, caller people are dire. Ralina is not hired.", "logic": "\nDonatist(oralle)\nCaller(oralle)\nNorse(ralina)\nCaller(ralina)\nHired(jose)\nThirsty(jose)\nMongol(jose)\nforall x (Mongol(x) -> Norse(x))\nforall x (Donatist(x) -> Dire(x))\nThirsty(jose) -> Mongol(jose)\nThirsty(oralle) -> Mongol(oralle)\nDonatist(oralle) and Dire(oralle) -> Mongol(oralle)\nforall x (Hired(x) and Caller(x) -> Dire(x))\n\nnot Hired(ralina)\n\nnot Hired(ralina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Enoch is preset. Enoch is hierarchal. Sig is lesbian. Sig is hierarchal. Orelia is decorated. Orelia is abactinal. Orelia is labeled. White people are lesbian. Round people are faced. If Orelia is abactinal then Orelia is labeled. If Enoch is abactinal then Enoch is labeled. If Enoch is preset and Enoch is faced then Enoch is labeled. All decorated, hierarchal people are faced. Orelia is preset.", "logic": "\nPreset(enoch)\nHierarchal(enoch)\nLesbian(sig)\nHierarchal(sig)\nDecorated(orelia)\nAbactinal(orelia)\nLabeled(orelia)\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Lesbian(x))\nforall x (Preset(x) -> Faced(x))\nAbactinal(orelia) -> Labeled(orelia)\nAbactinal(enoch) -> Labeled(enoch)\nPreset(enoch) and Faced(enoch) -> Labeled(enoch)\nforall x (Decorated(x) and Hierarchal(x) -> Faced(x))\n\nPreset(orelia)\n\nPreset(orelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Roz is alkylic. Roz is naif. Witold is downstair. Witold is naif. Maxi is antebellum. Maxi is faecal. Maxi is moronic. White people are downstair. Round people are panamanian. If Maxi is faecal then Maxi is moronic. If Roz is faecal then Roz is moronic. If Roz is alkylic and Roz is panamanian then Roz is moronic. All antebellum, naif people are panamanian. Witold is not alkylic.", "logic": "\nAlkylic(roz)\nNaif(roz)\nDownstair(witold)\nNaif(witold)\nAntebellum(maxi)\nFaecal(maxi)\nMoronic(maxi)\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Downstair(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Panamanian(x))\nFaecal(maxi) -> Moronic(maxi)\nFaecal(roz) -> Moronic(roz)\nAlkylic(roz) and Panamanian(roz) -> Moronic(roz)\nforall x (Antebellum(x) and Naif(x) -> Panamanian(x))\n\nnot Alkylic(witold)\n\nnot Alkylic(witold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Renate is pyretic. Renate is neat. Ellis is uncut. Ellis is neat. Nonnah is mordant. Nonnah is explosive. Nonnah is ravaged. White people are uncut. Round people are bright. If Nonnah is explosive then Nonnah is ravaged. If Renate is explosive then Renate is ravaged. If Renate is pyretic and Renate is bright then Renate is ravaged. All mordant, neat people are bright. Renate is mordant.", "logic": "\nPyretic(renate)\nNeat(renate)\nUncut(ellis)\nNeat(ellis)\nMordant(nonnah)\nExplosive(nonnah)\nRavaged(nonnah)\nforall x (Ravaged(x) -> Uncut(x))\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Bright(x))\nExplosive(nonnah) -> Ravaged(nonnah)\nExplosive(renate) -> Ravaged(renate)\nPyretic(renate) and Bright(renate) -> Ravaged(renate)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Neat(x) -> Bright(x))\n\nMordant(renate)\n\nMordant(renate) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Emelda is adnexal. Emelda is betrothed. Katinka is uniovular. Katinka is betrothed. Audy is clitoral. Audy is stonelike. Audy is humpbacked. White people are uniovular. Round people are prudent. If Audy is stonelike then Audy is humpbacked. If Emelda is stonelike then Emelda is humpbacked. If Emelda is adnexal and Emelda is prudent then Emelda is humpbacked. All clitoral, betrothed people are prudent. Emelda is not stonelike.", "logic": "\nAdnexal(emelda)\nBetrothed(emelda)\nUniovular(katinka)\nBetrothed(katinka)\nClitoral(audy)\nStonelike(audy)\nHumpbacked(audy)\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) -> Uniovular(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) -> Prudent(x))\nStonelike(audy) -> Humpbacked(audy)\nStonelike(emelda) -> Humpbacked(emelda)\nAdnexal(emelda) and Prudent(emelda) -> Humpbacked(emelda)\nforall x (Clitoral(x) and Betrothed(x) -> Prudent(x))\n\nnot Stonelike(emelda)\n\nnot Stonelike(emelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Elsi is tyrannous. Elsi is celebrated. Blayne is biparous. Blayne is celebrated. Welsh is faulty. Welsh is duple. Welsh is notched. White people are biparous. Round people are tormented. If Welsh is duple then Welsh is notched. If Elsi is duple then Elsi is notched. If Elsi is tyrannous and Elsi is tormented then Elsi is notched. All faulty, celebrated people are tormented. Blayne is duple.", "logic": "\nTyrannous(elsi)\nCelebrated(elsi)\nBiparous(blayne)\nCelebrated(blayne)\nFaulty(welsh)\nDuple(welsh)\nNotched(welsh)\nforall x (Notched(x) -> Biparous(x))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Tormented(x))\nDuple(welsh) -> Notched(welsh)\nDuple(elsi) -> Notched(elsi)\nTyrannous(elsi) and Tormented(elsi) -> Notched(elsi)\nforall x (Faulty(x) and Celebrated(x) -> Tormented(x))\n\nDuple(blayne)\n\nDuple(blayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-91"} {"premises": "Major is biogenetic. Laurel is lengthened. If someone is biogenetic then they are governable. Young people are springless. Big people are osseous. If Laurel is springless then Laurel is governable. All lengthened people are springless. All governable people are springless. All governable, lengthened people are clubbable. Big, lengthened people are governable. Laurel is lengthened.", "logic": "\nBiogenetic(major)\nLengthened(laurel)\nforall x (Biogenetic(x) -> Governable(x))\nforall x (Osseous(x) -> Springless(x))\nforall x (Biogenetic(x) -> Osseous(x))\nSpringless(laurel) -> Governable(laurel)\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Springless(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) -> Springless(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) and Lengthened(x) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Biogenetic(x) and Lengthened(x) -> Governable(x))\n\nLengthened(laurel)\n\ntherefore Lengthened(laurel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Agnella is osmotic. Odell is hibernal. If someone is osmotic then they are wimpish. Young people are whippy. Big people are benzylic. If Odell is whippy then Odell is wimpish. All hibernal people are whippy. All wimpish people are whippy. All wimpish, hibernal people are monotone. Big, hibernal people are wimpish. Agnella is not osmotic.", "logic": "\nOsmotic(agnella)\nHibernal(odell)\nforall x (Osmotic(x) -> Wimpish(x))\nforall x (Benzylic(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Osmotic(x) -> Benzylic(x))\nWhippy(odell) -> Wimpish(odell)\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Wimpish(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Wimpish(x) and Hibernal(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Osmotic(x) and Hibernal(x) -> Wimpish(x))\n\nnot Osmotic(agnella)\n\ntherefore Osmotic(agnella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Tatum is mediocre. Florice is snide. If someone is mediocre then they are moony. Young people are andalusian. Big people are evitable. If Florice is andalusian then Florice is moony. All snide people are andalusian. All moony people are andalusian. All moony, snide people are premiere. Big, snide people are moony. Tatum is evitable.", "logic": "\nMediocre(tatum)\nSnide(florice)\nforall x (Mediocre(x) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Evitable(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) -> Evitable(x))\nAndalusian(florice) -> Moony(florice)\nforall x (Snide(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Moony(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Moony(x) and Snide(x) -> Premiere(x))\nforall x (Mediocre(x) and Snide(x) -> Moony(x))\n\nEvitable(tatum)\n\nMediocre(tatum) and forall x (Mediocre(x) -> Evitable(x)) -> therefore Evitable(tatum)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Alleen is angered. Roxanna is kindled. If someone is angered then they are diastolic. Young people are cheeselike. Big people are restricted. If Roxanna is cheeselike then Roxanna is diastolic. All kindled people are cheeselike. All diastolic people are cheeselike. All diastolic, kindled people are unsyllabic. Big, kindled people are diastolic. Alleen is not restricted.", "logic": "\nAngered(alleen)\nKindled(roxanna)\nforall x (Angered(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\nforall x (Angered(x) -> Restricted(x))\nCheeselike(roxanna) -> Diastolic(roxanna)\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Kindled(x) -> Unsyllabic(x))\nforall x (Angered(x) and Kindled(x) -> Diastolic(x))\n\nnot Restricted(alleen)\n\nAngered(alleen) and forall x (Angered(x) -> Restricted(x)) -> therefore Restricted(alleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Jinny is pentatonic. Emylee is fingerlike. If someone is pentatonic then they are attachable. Young people are fordable. Big people are untaught. If Emylee is fordable then Emylee is attachable. All fingerlike people are fordable. All attachable people are fordable. All attachable, fingerlike people are dolourous. Big, fingerlike people are attachable. Jinny is fordable.", "logic": "\nPentatonic(jinny)\nFingerlike(emylee)\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Attachable(x))\nforall x (Untaught(x) -> Fordable(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Untaught(x))\nFordable(emylee) -> Attachable(emylee)\nforall x (Fingerlike(x) -> Fordable(x))\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> Fordable(x))\nforall x (Attachable(x) and Fingerlike(x) -> Dolourous(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) and Fingerlike(x) -> Attachable(x))\n\nFordable(jinny)\n\nPentatonic(jinny) and forall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Attachable(x)) -> therefore Attachable(jinny) Attachable(jinny) and forall x (Attachable(x) -> Fordable(x)) -> therefore Fordable(jinny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Allegra is publicised. Shandee is mystical. If someone is publicised then they are sporting. Young people are endurable. Big people are autarkical. If Shandee is endurable then Shandee is sporting. All mystical people are endurable. All sporting people are endurable. All sporting, mystical people are footsure. Big, mystical people are sporting. Shandee is not sporting.", "logic": "\nPublicised(allegra)\nMystical(shandee)\nforall x (Publicised(x) -> Sporting(x))\nforall x (Autarkical(x) -> Endurable(x))\nforall x (Publicised(x) -> Autarkical(x))\nEndurable(shandee) -> Sporting(shandee)\nforall x (Mystical(x) -> Endurable(x))\nforall x (Sporting(x) -> Endurable(x))\nforall x (Sporting(x) and Mystical(x) -> Footsure(x))\nforall x (Publicised(x) and Mystical(x) -> Sporting(x))\n\nnot Sporting(shandee)\n\nMystical(shandee) and forall x (Mystical(x) -> Endurable(x)) -> therefore Endurable(shandee) Endurable(shandee) and Endurable(shandee) -> Sporting(shandee) -> therefore Sporting(shandee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Giuseppe is unheard. Randene is motivative. If someone is unheard then they are wiccan. Young people are composite. Big people are occluded. If Randene is composite then Randene is wiccan. All motivative people are composite. All wiccan people are composite. All wiccan, motivative people are observable. Big, motivative people are wiccan. Randene is observable.", "logic": "\nUnheard(giuseppe)\nMotivative(randene)\nforall x (Unheard(x) -> Wiccan(x))\nforall x (Occluded(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Unheard(x) -> Occluded(x))\nComposite(randene) -> Wiccan(randene)\nforall x (Motivative(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Wiccan(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Wiccan(x) and Motivative(x) -> Observable(x))\nforall x (Unheard(x) and Motivative(x) -> Wiccan(x))\n\nObservable(randene)\n\nMotivative(randene) and forall x (Motivative(x) -> Composite(x)) -> therefore Composite(randene) Composite(randene) and Composite(randene) -> Wiccan(randene) -> therefore Wiccan(randene) Wiccan(randene) and Motivative(randene) and forall x (Wiccan(x) and Motivative(x) -> Observable(x)) -> therefore Observable(randene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Neron is chthonian. Ike is linnean. If someone is chthonian then they are calloused. Young people are deductive. Big people are lapidary. If Ike is deductive then Ike is calloused. All linnean people are deductive. All calloused people are deductive. All calloused, linnean people are citified. Big, linnean people are calloused. Ike is not citified.", "logic": "\nChthonian(neron)\nLinnean(ike)\nforall x (Chthonian(x) -> Calloused(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Deductive(x))\nforall x (Chthonian(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nDeductive(ike) -> Calloused(ike)\nforall x (Linnean(x) -> Deductive(x))\nforall x (Calloused(x) -> Deductive(x))\nforall x (Calloused(x) and Linnean(x) -> Citified(x))\nforall x (Chthonian(x) and Linnean(x) -> Calloused(x))\n\nnot Citified(ike)\n\nLinnean(ike) and forall x (Linnean(x) -> Deductive(x)) -> therefore Deductive(ike) Deductive(ike) and Deductive(ike) -> Calloused(ike) -> therefore Calloused(ike) Calloused(ike) and Linnean(ike) and forall x (Calloused(x) and Linnean(x) -> Citified(x)) -> therefore Citified(ike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Marve is ductile. Regen is cubiform. If someone is ductile then they are winged. Young people are cyprinoid. Big people are neapolitan. If Regen is cyprinoid then Regen is winged. All cubiform people are cyprinoid. All winged people are cyprinoid. All winged, cubiform people are scared. Big, cubiform people are winged. Marve is not scared.", "logic": "\nDuctile(marve)\nCubiform(regen)\nforall x (Ductile(x) -> Winged(x))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Ductile(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\nCyprinoid(regen) -> Winged(regen)\nforall x (Cubiform(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Winged(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Winged(x) and Cubiform(x) -> Scared(x))\nforall x (Ductile(x) and Cubiform(x) -> Winged(x))\n\nnot Scared(marve)\n\nforall x (Winged(x) and Cubiform(x) -> Scared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Maire is askant. Denna is uvular. If someone is askant then they are tetragonal. Young people are ibsenian. Big people are steely. If Denna is ibsenian then Denna is tetragonal. All uvular people are ibsenian. All tetragonal people are ibsenian. All tetragonal, uvular people are corinthian. Big, uvular people are tetragonal. Denna is steely.", "logic": "\nAskant(maire)\nUvular(denna)\nforall x (Askant(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Steely(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Askant(x) -> Steely(x))\nIbsenian(denna) -> Tetragonal(denna)\nforall x (Uvular(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and Uvular(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Askant(x) and Uvular(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\n\nSteely(denna)\n\nforall x (Askant(x) -> Steely(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Celle is asquint. Bertie is sheared. If someone is asquint then they are operant. Young people are suggestive. Big people are ignitible. If Bertie is suggestive then Bertie is operant. All sheared people are suggestive. All operant people are suggestive. All operant, sheared people are endearing. Big, sheared people are operant. Bertie is not asquint.", "logic": "\nAsquint(celle)\nSheared(bertie)\nforall x (Asquint(x) -> Operant(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Asquint(x) -> Ignitible(x))\nSuggestive(bertie) -> Operant(bertie)\nforall x (Sheared(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Operant(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Operant(x) and Sheared(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Asquint(x) and Sheared(x) -> Operant(x))\n\nnot Asquint(bertie)\n\nnot Asquint(bertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Minta is undersea. Carlita is packaged. If someone is undersea then they are catamenial. Young people are aired. Big people are appeasable. If Carlita is aired then Carlita is catamenial. All packaged people are aired. All catamenial people are aired. All catamenial, packaged people are greedy. Big, packaged people are catamenial. Carlita is nice.", "logic": "\nUndersea(minta)\nPackaged(carlita)\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Appeasable(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Appeasable(x))\nAired(carlita) -> Catamenial(carlita)\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) and Packaged(x) -> Greedy(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) and Packaged(x) -> Catamenial(x))\n\nNice(carlita)\n\nNice(carlita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Lionello is acneiform. Sheree is digital. If someone is acneiform then they are compulsory. Young people are trifling. Big people are decreased. If Sheree is trifling then Sheree is compulsory. All digital people are trifling. All compulsory people are trifling. All compulsory, digital people are unbolted. Big, digital people are compulsory. Lionello is not digital.", "logic": "\nAcneiform(lionello)\nDigital(sheree)\nforall x (Acneiform(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Decreased(x) -> Trifling(x))\nforall x (Acneiform(x) -> Decreased(x))\nTrifling(sheree) -> Compulsory(sheree)\nforall x (Digital(x) -> Trifling(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Trifling(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) and Digital(x) -> Unbolted(x))\nforall x (Acneiform(x) and Digital(x) -> Compulsory(x))\n\nnot Digital(lionello)\n\nnot Digital(lionello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Uli is unfueled. Clint is omissible. If someone is unfueled then they are usurious. Young people are navigable. Big people are lacerate. If Clint is navigable then Clint is usurious. All omissible people are navigable. All usurious people are navigable. All usurious, omissible people are lamenting. Big, omissible people are usurious. Uli is nice.", "logic": "\nUnfueled(uli)\nOmissible(clint)\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Usurious(x))\nforall x (Lacerate(x) -> Navigable(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Lacerate(x))\nNavigable(clint) -> Usurious(clint)\nforall x (Omissible(x) -> Navigable(x))\nforall x (Usurious(x) -> Navigable(x))\nforall x (Usurious(x) and Omissible(x) -> Lamenting(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and Omissible(x) -> Usurious(x))\n\nNice(uli)\n\nNice(uli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-804"} {"premises": "Caspar is crazed. Caspar is not federal. Caspar is ebony. Caspar is straggly. Matilde is coeliac. Jennifer is not crazed. Jennifer is federal. Dyna is crazed. Dyna is not federal. Dyna is ebony. If something is nilotic and ebony then it is straggly. All federal things are not straggly. Quiet, nilotic things are crazed. If something is straggly and not ebony then it is federal. All straggly things are coeliac. All federal things are not ulcerative. If Matilde is federal and Matilde is ulcerative then Matilde is crazed. All ebony things are nilotic. Caspar is straggly.", "logic": "\nCrazed(caspar)\nnot Federal(caspar)\nEbony(caspar)\nStraggly(caspar)\nCoeliac(matilde)\nnot Crazed(jennifer)\nFederal(jennifer)\nCrazed(dyna)\nnot Federal(dyna)\nEbony(dyna)\nforall x (Nilotic(x) and Ebony(x) -> Straggly(x))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> not Straggly(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) and Nilotic(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Straggly(x) and not Ebony(x) -> Federal(x))\nforall x (Straggly(x) -> Coeliac(x))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> not Ulcerative(x))\nFederal(matilde) and Ulcerative(matilde) -> Crazed(matilde)\nforall x (Ebony(x) -> Nilotic(x))\n\nStraggly(caspar)\n\ntherefore Straggly(caspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Nickey is undepicted. Nickey is not peopled. Nickey is twisting. Nickey is tiptop. Barr is amateur. Hayward is not undepicted. Hayward is peopled. Juline is undepicted. Juline is not peopled. Juline is twisting. If something is endergonic and twisting then it is tiptop. All peopled things are not tiptop. Quiet, endergonic things are undepicted. If something is tiptop and not twisting then it is peopled. All tiptop things are amateur. All peopled things are not irritative. If Barr is peopled and Barr is irritative then Barr is undepicted. All twisting things are endergonic. Barr is not amateur.", "logic": "\nUndepicted(nickey)\nnot Peopled(nickey)\nTwisting(nickey)\nTiptop(nickey)\nAmateur(barr)\nnot Undepicted(hayward)\nPeopled(hayward)\nUndepicted(juline)\nnot Peopled(juline)\nTwisting(juline)\nforall x (Endergonic(x) and Twisting(x) -> Tiptop(x))\nforall x (Peopled(x) -> not Tiptop(x))\nforall x (Amateur(x) and Endergonic(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Tiptop(x) and not Twisting(x) -> Peopled(x))\nforall x (Tiptop(x) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Peopled(x) -> not Irritative(x))\nPeopled(barr) and Irritative(barr) -> Undepicted(barr)\nforall x (Twisting(x) -> Endergonic(x))\n\nnot Amateur(barr)\n\ntherefore Amateur(barr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Saudra is vexatious. Saudra is not lxxviii. Saudra is mortal. Saudra is erudite. Edeline is motile. Remus is not vexatious. Remus is lxxviii. Carmella is vexatious. Carmella is not lxxviii. Carmella is mortal. If something is mislabeled and mortal then it is erudite. All lxxviii things are not erudite. Quiet, mislabeled things are vexatious. If something is erudite and not mortal then it is lxxviii. All erudite things are motile. All lxxviii things are not inspired. If Edeline is lxxviii and Edeline is inspired then Edeline is vexatious. All mortal things are mislabeled. Saudra is mislabeled.", "logic": "\nVexatious(saudra)\nnot Lxxviii(saudra)\nMortal(saudra)\nErudite(saudra)\nMotile(edeline)\nnot Vexatious(remus)\nLxxviii(remus)\nVexatious(carmella)\nnot Lxxviii(carmella)\nMortal(carmella)\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) and Mortal(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> not Erudite(x))\nforall x (Motile(x) and Mislabeled(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Erudite(x) and not Mortal(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Erudite(x) -> Motile(x))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> not Inspired(x))\nLxxviii(edeline) and Inspired(edeline) -> Vexatious(edeline)\nforall x (Mortal(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\n\nMislabeled(saudra)\n\nMortal(saudra) and forall x (Mortal(x) -> Mislabeled(x)) -> therefore Mislabeled(saudra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Charlton is caesarian. Charlton is not consistent. Charlton is socialised. Charlton is redolent. Vasily is star. Perry is not caesarian. Perry is consistent. Megen is caesarian. Megen is not consistent. Megen is socialised. If something is cycloid and socialised then it is redolent. All consistent things are not redolent. Quiet, cycloid things are caesarian. If something is redolent and not socialised then it is consistent. All redolent things are star. All consistent things are not lengthened. If Vasily is consistent and Vasily is lengthened then Vasily is caesarian. All socialised things are cycloid. Charlton is not star.", "logic": "\nCaesarian(charlton)\nnot Consistent(charlton)\nSocialised(charlton)\nRedolent(charlton)\nStar(vasily)\nnot Caesarian(perry)\nConsistent(perry)\nCaesarian(megen)\nnot Consistent(megen)\nSocialised(megen)\nforall x (Cycloid(x) and Socialised(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> not Redolent(x))\nforall x (Star(x) and Cycloid(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Redolent(x) and not Socialised(x) -> Consistent(x))\nforall x (Redolent(x) -> Star(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> not Lengthened(x))\nConsistent(vasily) and Lengthened(vasily) -> Caesarian(vasily)\nforall x (Socialised(x) -> Cycloid(x))\n\nnot Star(charlton)\n\nRedolent(charlton) and forall x (Redolent(x) -> Star(x)) -> therefore Star(charlton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Frances is previous. Frances is not coaxing. Frances is turbulent. Frances is bronchial. Anya is invincible. Ursula is not previous. Ursula is coaxing. Zebulen is previous. Zebulen is not coaxing. Zebulen is turbulent. If something is weak and turbulent then it is bronchial. All coaxing things are not bronchial. Quiet, weak things are previous. If something is bronchial and not turbulent then it is coaxing. All bronchial things are invincible. All coaxing things are not sunk. If Anya is coaxing and Anya is sunk then Anya is previous. All turbulent things are weak. Zebulen is bronchial.", "logic": "\nPrevious(frances)\nnot Coaxing(frances)\nTurbulent(frances)\nBronchial(frances)\nInvincible(anya)\nnot Previous(ursula)\nCoaxing(ursula)\nPrevious(zebulen)\nnot Coaxing(zebulen)\nTurbulent(zebulen)\nforall x (Weak(x) and Turbulent(x) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Coaxing(x) -> not Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Invincible(x) and Weak(x) -> Previous(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) and not Turbulent(x) -> Coaxing(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Invincible(x))\nforall x (Coaxing(x) -> not Sunk(x))\nCoaxing(anya) and Sunk(anya) -> Previous(anya)\nforall x (Turbulent(x) -> Weak(x))\n\nBronchial(zebulen)\n\nTurbulent(zebulen) and forall x (Turbulent(x) -> Weak(x)) -> therefore Weak(zebulen) Weak(zebulen) and Turbulent(zebulen) and forall x (Weak(x) and Turbulent(x) -> Bronchial(x)) -> therefore Bronchial(zebulen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Merv is swampy. Merv is not united. Merv is unpierced. Merv is near. Raphaela is lxiv. Lacee is not swampy. Lacee is united. Querida is swampy. Querida is not united. Querida is unpierced. If something is felted and unpierced then it is near. All united things are not near. Quiet, felted things are swampy. If something is near and not unpierced then it is united. All near things are lxiv. All united things are not felicitous. If Raphaela is united and Raphaela is felicitous then Raphaela is swampy. All unpierced things are felted. Querida is not near.", "logic": "\nSwampy(merv)\nnot United(merv)\nUnpierced(merv)\nNear(merv)\nLxiv(raphaela)\nnot Swampy(lacee)\nUnited(lacee)\nSwampy(querida)\nnot United(querida)\nUnpierced(querida)\nforall x (Felted(x) and Unpierced(x) -> Near(x))\nforall x (United(x) -> not Near(x))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) and Felted(x) -> Swampy(x))\nforall x (Near(x) and not Unpierced(x) -> United(x))\nforall x (Near(x) -> Lxiv(x))\nforall x (United(x) -> not Felicitous(x))\nUnited(raphaela) and Felicitous(raphaela) -> Swampy(raphaela)\nforall x (Unpierced(x) -> Felted(x))\n\nnot Near(querida)\n\nUnpierced(querida) and forall x (Unpierced(x) -> Felted(x)) -> therefore Felted(querida) Felted(querida) and Unpierced(querida) and forall x (Felted(x) and Unpierced(x) -> Near(x)) -> therefore Near(querida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Elvis is crowing. Elvis is not purple. Elvis is pixilated. Elvis is exalting. Celia is abundant. Lyndon is not crowing. Lyndon is purple. Jaynell is crowing. Jaynell is not purple. Jaynell is pixilated. If something is seamanlike and pixilated then it is exalting. All purple things are not exalting. Quiet, seamanlike things are crowing. If something is exalting and not pixilated then it is purple. All exalting things are abundant. All purple things are not topping. If Celia is purple and Celia is topping then Celia is crowing. All pixilated things are seamanlike. Jaynell is abundant.", "logic": "\nCrowing(elvis)\nnot Purple(elvis)\nPixilated(elvis)\nExalting(elvis)\nAbundant(celia)\nnot Crowing(lyndon)\nPurple(lyndon)\nCrowing(jaynell)\nnot Purple(jaynell)\nPixilated(jaynell)\nforall x (Seamanlike(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Purple(x) -> not Exalting(x))\nforall x (Abundant(x) and Seamanlike(x) -> Crowing(x))\nforall x (Exalting(x) and not Pixilated(x) -> Purple(x))\nforall x (Exalting(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Purple(x) -> not Topping(x))\nPurple(celia) and Topping(celia) -> Crowing(celia)\nforall x (Pixilated(x) -> Seamanlike(x))\n\nAbundant(jaynell)\n\nPixilated(jaynell) and forall x (Pixilated(x) -> Seamanlike(x)) -> therefore Seamanlike(jaynell) Seamanlike(jaynell) and Pixilated(jaynell) and forall x (Seamanlike(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Exalting(x)) -> therefore Exalting(jaynell) Exalting(jaynell) and forall x (Exalting(x) -> Abundant(x)) -> therefore Abundant(jaynell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Dodie is mythic. Dodie is not lesbian. Dodie is pedagogic. Dodie is modified. Keene is ambulant. Tabbi is not mythic. Tabbi is lesbian. Nela is mythic. Nela is not lesbian. Nela is pedagogic. If something is unbloody and pedagogic then it is modified. All lesbian things are not modified. Quiet, unbloody things are mythic. If something is modified and not pedagogic then it is lesbian. All modified things are ambulant. All lesbian things are not eutherian. If Keene is lesbian and Keene is eutherian then Keene is mythic. All pedagogic things are unbloody. Nela is not ambulant.", "logic": "\nMythic(dodie)\nnot Lesbian(dodie)\nPedagogic(dodie)\nModified(dodie)\nAmbulant(keene)\nnot Mythic(tabbi)\nLesbian(tabbi)\nMythic(nela)\nnot Lesbian(nela)\nPedagogic(nela)\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Pedagogic(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Lesbian(x) -> not Modified(x))\nforall x (Ambulant(x) and Unbloody(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) and not Pedagogic(x) -> Lesbian(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) -> Ambulant(x))\nforall x (Lesbian(x) -> not Eutherian(x))\nLesbian(keene) and Eutherian(keene) -> Mythic(keene)\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Unbloody(x))\n\nnot Ambulant(nela)\n\nPedagogic(nela) and forall x (Pedagogic(x) -> Unbloody(x)) -> therefore Unbloody(nela) Unbloody(nela) and Pedagogic(nela) and forall x (Unbloody(x) and Pedagogic(x) -> Modified(x)) -> therefore Modified(nela) Modified(nela) and forall x (Modified(x) -> Ambulant(x)) -> therefore Ambulant(nela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Doralia is andalusian. Doralia is not reinforced. Doralia is croupy. Doralia is efficient. Shamus is incarnate. Chalmers is not andalusian. Chalmers is reinforced. Wye is andalusian. Wye is not reinforced. Wye is croupy. If something is demolished and croupy then it is efficient. All reinforced things are not efficient. Quiet, demolished things are andalusian. If something is efficient and not croupy then it is reinforced. All efficient things are incarnate. All reinforced things are not carbonated. If Shamus is reinforced and Shamus is carbonated then Shamus is andalusian. All croupy things are demolished. Shamus is not efficient.", "logic": "\nAndalusian(doralia)\nnot Reinforced(doralia)\nCroupy(doralia)\nEfficient(doralia)\nIncarnate(shamus)\nnot Andalusian(chalmers)\nReinforced(chalmers)\nAndalusian(wye)\nnot Reinforced(wye)\nCroupy(wye)\nforall x (Demolished(x) and Croupy(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Reinforced(x) -> not Efficient(x))\nforall x (Incarnate(x) and Demolished(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) and not Croupy(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> Incarnate(x))\nforall x (Reinforced(x) -> not Carbonated(x))\nReinforced(shamus) and Carbonated(shamus) -> Andalusian(shamus)\nforall x (Croupy(x) -> Demolished(x))\n\nnot Efficient(shamus)\n\nforall x (Demolished(x) and Croupy(x) -> Efficient(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Simonette is paniculate. Simonette is not passe. Simonette is dextrorse. Simonette is geographic. Marcelle is precooled. Katie is not paniculate. Katie is passe. Almira is paniculate. Almira is not passe. Almira is dextrorse. If something is foggy and dextrorse then it is geographic. All passe things are not geographic. Quiet, foggy things are paniculate. If something is geographic and not dextrorse then it is passe. All geographic things are precooled. All passe things are not sere. If Marcelle is passe and Marcelle is sere then Marcelle is paniculate. All dextrorse things are foggy. Katie is precooled.", "logic": "\nPaniculate(simonette)\nnot Passe(simonette)\nDextrorse(simonette)\nGeographic(simonette)\nPrecooled(marcelle)\nnot Paniculate(katie)\nPasse(katie)\nPaniculate(almira)\nnot Passe(almira)\nDextrorse(almira)\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Dextrorse(x) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) -> not Geographic(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) and Foggy(x) -> Paniculate(x))\nforall x (Geographic(x) and not Dextrorse(x) -> Passe(x))\nforall x (Geographic(x) -> Precooled(x))\nforall x (Passe(x) -> not Sere(x))\nPasse(marcelle) and Sere(marcelle) -> Paniculate(marcelle)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Foggy(x))\n\nPrecooled(katie)\n\nforall x (Geographic(x) -> Precooled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Kalman is petaled. Kalman is not buttery. Kalman is rocklike. Kalman is mauritian. Clari is pyaemic. Morganica is not petaled. Morganica is buttery. Cobby is petaled. Cobby is not buttery. Cobby is rocklike. If something is uneducated and rocklike then it is mauritian. All buttery things are not mauritian. Quiet, uneducated things are petaled. If something is mauritian and not rocklike then it is buttery. All mauritian things are pyaemic. All buttery things are not doltish. If Clari is buttery and Clari is doltish then Clari is petaled. All rocklike things are uneducated. Morganica is not uneducated.", "logic": "\nPetaled(kalman)\nnot Buttery(kalman)\nRocklike(kalman)\nMauritian(kalman)\nPyaemic(clari)\nnot Petaled(morganica)\nButtery(morganica)\nPetaled(cobby)\nnot Buttery(cobby)\nRocklike(cobby)\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Rocklike(x) -> Mauritian(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> not Mauritian(x))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) and Uneducated(x) -> Petaled(x))\nforall x (Mauritian(x) and not Rocklike(x) -> Buttery(x))\nforall x (Mauritian(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> not Doltish(x))\nButtery(clari) and Doltish(clari) -> Petaled(clari)\nforall x (Rocklike(x) -> Uneducated(x))\n\nnot Uneducated(morganica)\n\nforall x (Rocklike(x) -> Uneducated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Micah is outcaste. Micah is not bimanual. Micah is unrenewed. Micah is flagrant. Laurella is applicable. Walsh is not outcaste. Walsh is bimanual. Rora is outcaste. Rora is not bimanual. Rora is unrenewed. If something is banging and unrenewed then it is flagrant. All bimanual things are not flagrant. Quiet, banging things are outcaste. If something is flagrant and not unrenewed then it is bimanual. All flagrant things are applicable. All bimanual things are not maroc. If Laurella is bimanual and Laurella is maroc then Laurella is outcaste. All unrenewed things are banging. Laurella is banging.", "logic": "\nOutcaste(micah)\nnot Bimanual(micah)\nUnrenewed(micah)\nFlagrant(micah)\nApplicable(laurella)\nnot Outcaste(walsh)\nBimanual(walsh)\nOutcaste(rora)\nnot Bimanual(rora)\nUnrenewed(rora)\nforall x (Banging(x) and Unrenewed(x) -> Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Bimanual(x) -> not Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) and Banging(x) -> Outcaste(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) and not Unrenewed(x) -> Bimanual(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Applicable(x))\nforall x (Bimanual(x) -> not Maroc(x))\nBimanual(laurella) and Maroc(laurella) -> Outcaste(laurella)\nforall x (Unrenewed(x) -> Banging(x))\n\nBanging(laurella)\n\nforall x (Unrenewed(x) -> Banging(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Shelli is bias. Shelli is not flavorous. Shelli is reliable. Shelli is wobbling. Luce is pleased. Rhetta is not bias. Rhetta is flavorous. Harland is bias. Harland is not flavorous. Harland is reliable. If something is talentless and reliable then it is wobbling. All flavorous things are not wobbling. Quiet, talentless things are bias. If something is wobbling and not reliable then it is flavorous. All wobbling things are pleased. All flavorous things are not foetal. If Luce is flavorous and Luce is foetal then Luce is bias. All reliable things are talentless. Rhetta is not reliable.", "logic": "\nBias(shelli)\nnot Flavorous(shelli)\nReliable(shelli)\nWobbling(shelli)\nPleased(luce)\nnot Bias(rhetta)\nFlavorous(rhetta)\nBias(harland)\nnot Flavorous(harland)\nReliable(harland)\nforall x (Talentless(x) and Reliable(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Flavorous(x) -> not Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Pleased(x) and Talentless(x) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) and not Reliable(x) -> Flavorous(x))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Flavorous(x) -> not Foetal(x))\nFlavorous(luce) and Foetal(luce) -> Bias(luce)\nforall x (Reliable(x) -> Talentless(x))\n\nnot Reliable(rhetta)\n\nnot Reliable(rhetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Vittoria is human. Vittoria is not underdone. Vittoria is invasive. Vittoria is tetragonal. Erinna is large. Cordey is not human. Cordey is underdone. Yancy is human. Yancy is not underdone. Yancy is invasive. If something is cobwebby and invasive then it is tetragonal. All underdone things are not tetragonal. Quiet, cobwebby things are human. If something is tetragonal and not invasive then it is underdone. All tetragonal things are large. All underdone things are not uninitiate. If Erinna is underdone and Erinna is uninitiate then Erinna is human. All invasive things are cobwebby. Yancy is uninitiate.", "logic": "\nHuman(vittoria)\nnot Underdone(vittoria)\nInvasive(vittoria)\nTetragonal(vittoria)\nLarge(erinna)\nnot Human(cordey)\nUnderdone(cordey)\nHuman(yancy)\nnot Underdone(yancy)\nInvasive(yancy)\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) and Invasive(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> not Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Large(x) and Cobwebby(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and not Invasive(x) -> Underdone(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) -> Large(x))\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> not Uninitiate(x))\nUnderdone(erinna) and Uninitiate(erinna) -> Human(erinna)\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\n\nUninitiate(yancy)\n\nUninitiate(yancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Leticia is subversive. Leticia is not vicarious. Leticia is classless. Leticia is lachrymal. Hobart is soulful. Jed is not subversive. Jed is vicarious. Lenard is subversive. Lenard is not vicarious. Lenard is classless. If something is gilled and classless then it is lachrymal. All vicarious things are not lachrymal. Quiet, gilled things are subversive. If something is lachrymal and not classless then it is vicarious. All lachrymal things are soulful. All vicarious things are not enhancive. If Hobart is vicarious and Hobart is enhancive then Hobart is subversive. All classless things are gilled. Hobart is not enhancive.", "logic": "\nSubversive(leticia)\nnot Vicarious(leticia)\nClassless(leticia)\nLachrymal(leticia)\nSoulful(hobart)\nnot Subversive(jed)\nVicarious(jed)\nSubversive(lenard)\nnot Vicarious(lenard)\nClassless(lenard)\nforall x (Gilled(x) and Classless(x) -> Lachrymal(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) -> not Lachrymal(x))\nforall x (Soulful(x) and Gilled(x) -> Subversive(x))\nforall x (Lachrymal(x) and not Classless(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Lachrymal(x) -> Soulful(x))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) -> not Enhancive(x))\nVicarious(hobart) and Enhancive(hobart) -> Subversive(hobart)\nforall x (Classless(x) -> Gilled(x))\n\nnot Enhancive(hobart)\n\nnot Enhancive(hobart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Blakeley is mucose. Blakeley is not factual. Blakeley is subscribed. Blakeley is monoclonal. Sibeal is moonlit. Rosamund is not mucose. Rosamund is factual. Teodoor is mucose. Teodoor is not factual. Teodoor is subscribed. If something is similar and subscribed then it is monoclonal. All factual things are not monoclonal. Quiet, similar things are mucose. If something is monoclonal and not subscribed then it is factual. All monoclonal things are moonlit. All factual things are not flowered. If Sibeal is factual and Sibeal is flowered then Sibeal is mucose. All subscribed things are similar. Sibeal is subscribed.", "logic": "\nMucose(blakeley)\nnot Factual(blakeley)\nSubscribed(blakeley)\nMonoclonal(blakeley)\nMoonlit(sibeal)\nnot Mucose(rosamund)\nFactual(rosamund)\nMucose(teodoor)\nnot Factual(teodoor)\nSubscribed(teodoor)\nforall x (Similar(x) and Subscribed(x) -> Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Factual(x) -> not Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Moonlit(x) and Similar(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) and not Subscribed(x) -> Factual(x))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Factual(x) -> not Flowered(x))\nFactual(sibeal) and Flowered(sibeal) -> Mucose(sibeal)\nforall x (Subscribed(x) -> Similar(x))\n\nSubscribed(sibeal)\n\nSubscribed(sibeal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1180"} {"premises": "Yigal is inimitable. Madelyn is hoofed. Peyter is composite. Hadley is hoofed. Blue things are socratic. Yigal is inimitable.", "logic": "\nInimitable(yigal)\nHoofed(madelyn)\nComposite(peyter)\nHoofed(hadley)\nforall x (Hoofed(x) -> Socratic(x))\n\nInimitable(yigal)\n\ntherefore Inimitable(yigal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "Antonella is vernacular. Reta is tectonic. Allina is over. Lisa is tectonic. Blue things are unrhythmic. Allina is not over.", "logic": "\nVernacular(antonella)\nTectonic(reta)\nOver(allina)\nTectonic(lisa)\nforall x (Tectonic(x) -> Unrhythmic(x))\n\nnot Over(allina)\n\ntherefore Over(allina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "Ibby is masterless. Franny is outermost. Kate is perinatal. Earl is outermost. Blue things are bland. Franny is bland.", "logic": "\nMasterless(ibby)\nOutermost(franny)\nPerinatal(kate)\nOutermost(earl)\nforall x (Outermost(x) -> Bland(x))\n\nBland(franny)\n\nOutermost(franny) and forall x (Outermost(x) -> Bland(x)) -> therefore Bland(franny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "Humphrey is stale. Patricia is webby. Bartlet is mute. Reggi is webby. Blue things are cacuminal. Patricia is not cacuminal.", "logic": "\nStale(humphrey)\nWebby(patricia)\nMute(bartlet)\nWebby(reggi)\nforall x (Webby(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\n\nnot Cacuminal(patricia)\n\nWebby(patricia) and forall x (Webby(x) -> Cacuminal(x)) -> therefore Cacuminal(patricia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "Nevins is algonkian. Orly is slivery. Rea is writhen. Rusty is slivery. Blue things are wainscoted. Rea is not wainscoted.", "logic": "\nAlgonkian(nevins)\nSlivery(orly)\nWrithen(rea)\nSlivery(rusty)\nforall x (Slivery(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\n\nnot Wainscoted(rea)\n\nforall x (Slivery(x) -> Wainscoted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "Sonnnie is verbalized. Josi is theistic. Davide is agonal. Emyle is theistic. Blue things are shelfy. Sonnnie is shelfy.", "logic": "\nVerbalized(sonnnie)\nTheistic(josi)\nAgonal(davide)\nTheistic(emyle)\nforall x (Theistic(x) -> Shelfy(x))\n\nShelfy(sonnnie)\n\nforall x (Theistic(x) -> Shelfy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "Derick is oviparous. Marylynne is afeared. Rodi is overgreedy. Byram is afeared. Blue things are anasarcous. Marylynne is not oviparous.", "logic": "\nOviparous(derick)\nAfeared(marylynne)\nOvergreedy(rodi)\nAfeared(byram)\nforall x (Afeared(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\n\nnot Oviparous(marylynne)\n\nnot Oviparous(marylynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "Thane is helpless. Magdalene is articled. Bamby is local. Ginnifer is articled. Blue things are shipshape. Thane is articled.", "logic": "\nHelpless(thane)\nArticled(magdalene)\nLocal(bamby)\nArticled(ginnifer)\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Shipshape(x))\n\nArticled(thane)\n\nArticled(thane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-47"} {"premises": "The jeniffer backtrack the evangelin. The jeniffer divorce the taryn. The jeniffer turn the ulises. The jeniffer turn the evangelin. The taryn is tzarist. The taryn is rotational. The taryn is permed. The taryn divorce the jeniffer. The ulises is rotational. The ulises backtrack the jeniffer. The ulises backtrack the taryn. The ulises divorce the taryn. The ulises turn the evangelin. The evangelin is rotational. The evangelin backtrack the ulises. The evangelin divorce the jeniffer. If the ulises divorce the jeniffer then the jeniffer divorce the evangelin. If someone divorce the jeniffer then the jeniffer is tzarist. If the ulises is leased and the ulises backtrack the jeniffer then the jeniffer backtrack the ulises. If someone is rotational then they are tzarist. If the ulises is rotational then the ulises is tzarist. If someone is permed and rotational then they need the jeniffer. If someone divorce the ulises then they need the evangelin. If the evangelin backtrack the taryn and the evangelin turn the taryn then the taryn backtrack the ulises. The evangelin backtrack the ulises.", "logic": "\nBacktrack(jeniffer, evangelin)\nDivorce(jeniffer, taryn)\nTurn(jeniffer, ulises)\nTurn(jeniffer, evangelin)\nTzarist(taryn)\nRotational(taryn)\nPermed(taryn)\nDivorce(taryn, jeniffer)\nRotational(ulises)\nBacktrack(ulises, jeniffer)\nBacktrack(ulises, taryn)\nDivorce(ulises, taryn)\nTurn(ulises, evangelin)\nRotational(evangelin)\nBacktrack(evangelin, ulises)\nDivorce(evangelin, jeniffer)\nDivorce(ulises, jeniffer) -> Divorce(jeniffer, evangelin)\nforall x (Divorce(x, jeniffer) -> Tzarist(jeniffer))\nLeased(ulises) and Backtrack(ulises, jeniffer) -> Backtrack(jeniffer, ulises)\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> Tzarist(x))\nRotational(ulises) -> Tzarist(ulises)\nforall x (Permed(x) and Rotational(x) -> Divorce(x, jeniffer))\nforall x (Divorce(x, ulises) -> Divorce(x, evangelin))\nBacktrack(evangelin, taryn) and Turn(evangelin, taryn) -> Backtrack(taryn, ulises)\n\nBacktrack(evangelin, ulises)\n\ntherefore Backtrack(evangelin, ulises)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4994"} {"premises": "The arlyn hurl the cal. The arlyn engulf the chelsy. The arlyn chute the willdon. The arlyn chute the cal. The chelsy is ugandan. The chelsy is atypical. The chelsy is incurable. The chelsy engulf the arlyn. The willdon is atypical. The willdon hurl the arlyn. The willdon hurl the chelsy. The willdon engulf the chelsy. The willdon chute the cal. The cal is atypical. The cal hurl the willdon. The cal engulf the arlyn. If the willdon engulf the arlyn then the arlyn engulf the cal. If someone engulf the arlyn then the arlyn is ugandan. If the willdon is futuristic and the willdon hurl the arlyn then the arlyn hurl the willdon. If someone is atypical then they are ugandan. If the willdon is atypical then the willdon is ugandan. If someone is incurable and atypical then they need the arlyn. If someone engulf the willdon then they need the cal. If the cal hurl the chelsy and the cal chute the chelsy then the chelsy hurl the willdon. The chelsy does not need the arlyn.", "logic": "\nHurl(arlyn, cal)\nEngulf(arlyn, chelsy)\nChute(arlyn, willdon)\nChute(arlyn, cal)\nUgandan(chelsy)\nAtypical(chelsy)\nIncurable(chelsy)\nEngulf(chelsy, arlyn)\nAtypical(willdon)\nHurl(willdon, arlyn)\nHurl(willdon, chelsy)\nEngulf(willdon, chelsy)\nChute(willdon, cal)\nAtypical(cal)\nHurl(cal, willdon)\nEngulf(cal, arlyn)\nEngulf(willdon, arlyn) -> Engulf(arlyn, cal)\nforall x (Engulf(x, arlyn) -> Ugandan(arlyn))\nFuturistic(willdon) and Hurl(willdon, arlyn) -> Hurl(arlyn, willdon)\nforall x (Atypical(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nAtypical(willdon) -> Ugandan(willdon)\nforall x (Incurable(x) and Atypical(x) -> Engulf(x, arlyn))\nforall x (Engulf(x, willdon) -> Engulf(x, cal))\nHurl(cal, chelsy) and Chute(cal, chelsy) -> Hurl(chelsy, willdon)\n\nnot Engulf(chelsy, arlyn)\n\ntherefore Engulf(chelsy, arlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4994"} {"premises": "The johnathon siphon the dode. The johnathon query the corri. The johnathon catenate the mikhail. The johnathon catenate the dode. The corri is shrinkable. The corri is underdone. The corri is leaflike. The corri query the johnathon. The mikhail is underdone. The mikhail siphon the johnathon. The mikhail siphon the corri. The mikhail query the corri. The mikhail catenate the dode. The dode is underdone. The dode siphon the mikhail. The dode query the johnathon. If the mikhail query the johnathon then the johnathon query the dode. If someone query the johnathon then the johnathon is shrinkable. If the mikhail is brave and the mikhail siphon the johnathon then the johnathon siphon the mikhail. If someone is underdone then they are shrinkable. If the mikhail is underdone then the mikhail is shrinkable. If someone is leaflike and underdone then they need the johnathon. If someone query the mikhail then they need the dode. If the dode siphon the corri and the dode catenate the corri then the corri siphon the mikhail. The mikhail does not need the johnathon.", "logic": "\nSiphon(johnathon, dode)\nQuery(johnathon, corri)\nCatenate(johnathon, mikhail)\nCatenate(johnathon, dode)\nShrinkable(corri)\nUnderdone(corri)\nLeaflike(corri)\nQuery(corri, johnathon)\nUnderdone(mikhail)\nSiphon(mikhail, johnathon)\nSiphon(mikhail, corri)\nQuery(mikhail, corri)\nCatenate(mikhail, dode)\nUnderdone(dode)\nSiphon(dode, mikhail)\nQuery(dode, johnathon)\nQuery(mikhail, johnathon) -> Query(johnathon, dode)\nforall x (Query(x, johnathon) -> Shrinkable(johnathon))\nBrave(mikhail) and Siphon(mikhail, johnathon) -> Siphon(johnathon, mikhail)\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> Shrinkable(x))\nUnderdone(mikhail) -> Shrinkable(mikhail)\nforall x (Leaflike(x) and Underdone(x) -> Query(x, johnathon))\nforall x (Query(x, mikhail) -> Query(x, dode))\nSiphon(dode, corri) and Catenate(dode, corri) -> Siphon(corri, mikhail)\n\nnot Query(mikhail, johnathon)\n\nforall x (Leaflike(x) and Underdone(x) -> Query(x, johnathon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4994"} {"premises": "The aurelie powwow the jocelyne. The aurelie codify the tansy. The aurelie lallygag the rutledge. The aurelie lallygag the jocelyne. The tansy is subscribed. The tansy is phantom. The tansy is limbic. The tansy codify the aurelie. The rutledge is phantom. The rutledge powwow the aurelie. The rutledge powwow the tansy. The rutledge codify the tansy. The rutledge lallygag the jocelyne. The jocelyne is phantom. The jocelyne powwow the rutledge. The jocelyne codify the aurelie. If the rutledge codify the aurelie then the aurelie codify the jocelyne. If someone codify the aurelie then the aurelie is subscribed. If the rutledge is duodenal and the rutledge powwow the aurelie then the aurelie powwow the rutledge. If someone is phantom then they are subscribed. If the rutledge is phantom then the rutledge is subscribed. If someone is limbic and phantom then they need the aurelie. If someone codify the rutledge then they need the jocelyne. If the jocelyne powwow the tansy and the jocelyne lallygag the tansy then the tansy powwow the rutledge. The jocelyne lallygag the aurelie.", "logic": "\nPowwow(aurelie, jocelyne)\nCodify(aurelie, tansy)\nLallygag(aurelie, rutledge)\nLallygag(aurelie, jocelyne)\nSubscribed(tansy)\nPhantom(tansy)\nLimbic(tansy)\nCodify(tansy, aurelie)\nPhantom(rutledge)\nPowwow(rutledge, aurelie)\nPowwow(rutledge, tansy)\nCodify(rutledge, tansy)\nLallygag(rutledge, jocelyne)\nPhantom(jocelyne)\nPowwow(jocelyne, rutledge)\nCodify(jocelyne, aurelie)\nCodify(rutledge, aurelie) -> Codify(aurelie, jocelyne)\nforall x (Codify(x, aurelie) -> Subscribed(aurelie))\nDuodenal(rutledge) and Powwow(rutledge, aurelie) -> Powwow(aurelie, rutledge)\nforall x (Phantom(x) -> Subscribed(x))\nPhantom(rutledge) -> Subscribed(rutledge)\nforall x (Limbic(x) and Phantom(x) -> Codify(x, aurelie))\nforall x (Codify(x, rutledge) -> Codify(x, jocelyne))\nPowwow(jocelyne, tansy) and Lallygag(jocelyne, tansy) -> Powwow(tansy, rutledge)\n\nLallygag(jocelyne, aurelie)\n\nLallygag(jocelyne, aurelie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4994"} {"premises": "The hersch is rosaceous. The hersch ghettoize the odelia. The odelia carbonate the hersch. If something melodise the odelia and it melodise the hersch then the hersch is napoleonic. If something carbonate the hersch then it ghettoize the hersch. If something is rosaceous then it melodise the hersch. If something ghettoize the hersch then the hersch carbonate the odelia. If something melodise the odelia and it melodise the hersch then the hersch is redemptory. If something carbonate the odelia then it melodise the odelia. The odelia carbonate the hersch.", "logic": "\nRosaceous(hersch)\nGhettoize(hersch, odelia)\nCarbonate(odelia, hersch)\nforall x (Melodise(x, odelia) and Melodise(x, hersch) -> Napoleonic(hersch))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, hersch) -> Ghettoize(x, hersch))\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) -> Melodise(x, hersch))\nforall x (Ghettoize(x, hersch) -> Carbonate(hersch, odelia))\nforall x (Melodise(x, odelia) and Melodise(x, hersch) -> Redemptory(hersch))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, odelia) -> Melodise(x, odelia))\n\nCarbonate(odelia, hersch)\n\ntherefore Carbonate(odelia, hersch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The jereme is tigerish. The jereme downplay the cordie. The cordie faint the jereme. If something hide the cordie and it hide the jereme then the jereme is engaging. If something faint the jereme then it downplay the jereme. If something is tigerish then it hide the jereme. If something downplay the jereme then the jereme faint the cordie. If something hide the cordie and it hide the jereme then the jereme is canny. If something faint the cordie then it hide the cordie. The jereme is not tigerish.", "logic": "\nTigerish(jereme)\nDownplay(jereme, cordie)\nFaint(cordie, jereme)\nforall x (Hide(x, cordie) and Hide(x, jereme) -> Engaging(jereme))\nforall x (Faint(x, jereme) -> Downplay(x, jereme))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) -> Hide(x, jereme))\nforall x (Downplay(x, jereme) -> Faint(jereme, cordie))\nforall x (Hide(x, cordie) and Hide(x, jereme) -> Canny(jereme))\nforall x (Faint(x, cordie) -> Hide(x, cordie))\n\nnot Tigerish(jereme)\n\ntherefore Tigerish(jereme)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The jeannie is tillable. The jeannie gray the cammi. The cammi trace the jeannie. If something ornament the cammi and it ornament the jeannie then the jeannie is pyrrhic. If something trace the jeannie then it gray the jeannie. If something is tillable then it ornament the jeannie. If something gray the jeannie then the jeannie trace the cammi. If something ornament the cammi and it ornament the jeannie then the jeannie is farthest. If something trace the cammi then it ornament the cammi. The cammi gray the jeannie.", "logic": "\nTillable(jeannie)\nGray(jeannie, cammi)\nTrace(cammi, jeannie)\nforall x (Ornament(x, cammi) and Ornament(x, jeannie) -> Pyrrhic(jeannie))\nforall x (Trace(x, jeannie) -> Gray(x, jeannie))\nforall x (Tillable(x) -> Ornament(x, jeannie))\nforall x (Gray(x, jeannie) -> Trace(jeannie, cammi))\nforall x (Ornament(x, cammi) and Ornament(x, jeannie) -> Farthest(jeannie))\nforall x (Trace(x, cammi) -> Ornament(x, cammi))\n\nGray(cammi, jeannie)\n\nTrace(cammi, jeannie) and forall x (Trace(x, jeannie) -> Gray(x, jeannie)) -> therefore Gray(cammi, jeannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The lorilee is genetical. The lorilee reschedule the shirleen. The shirleen clack the lorilee. If something bollocks the shirleen and it bollocks the lorilee then the lorilee is unconfined. If something clack the lorilee then it reschedule the lorilee. If something is genetical then it bollocks the lorilee. If something reschedule the lorilee then the lorilee clack the shirleen. If something bollocks the shirleen and it bollocks the lorilee then the lorilee is outcast. If something clack the shirleen then it bollocks the shirleen. The shirleen does not need the lorilee.", "logic": "\nGenetical(lorilee)\nReschedule(lorilee, shirleen)\nClack(shirleen, lorilee)\nforall x (Bollocks(x, shirleen) and Bollocks(x, lorilee) -> Unconfined(lorilee))\nforall x (Clack(x, lorilee) -> Reschedule(x, lorilee))\nforall x (Genetical(x) -> Bollocks(x, lorilee))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, lorilee) -> Clack(lorilee, shirleen))\nforall x (Bollocks(x, shirleen) and Bollocks(x, lorilee) -> Outcast(lorilee))\nforall x (Clack(x, shirleen) -> Bollocks(x, shirleen))\n\nnot Reschedule(shirleen, lorilee)\n\nClack(shirleen, lorilee) and forall x (Clack(x, lorilee) -> Reschedule(x, lorilee)) -> therefore Reschedule(shirleen, lorilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The wolfie is anterior. The wolfie tussle the ira. The ira twit the wolfie. If something clock the ira and it clock the wolfie then the wolfie is parvenue. If something twit the wolfie then it tussle the wolfie. If something is anterior then it clock the wolfie. If something tussle the wolfie then the wolfie twit the ira. If something clock the ira and it clock the wolfie then the wolfie is polygynous. If something twit the ira then it clock the ira. The wolfie twit the ira.", "logic": "\nAnterior(wolfie)\nTussle(wolfie, ira)\nTwit(ira, wolfie)\nforall x (Clock(x, ira) and Clock(x, wolfie) -> Parvenue(wolfie))\nforall x (Twit(x, wolfie) -> Tussle(x, wolfie))\nforall x (Anterior(x) -> Clock(x, wolfie))\nforall x (Tussle(x, wolfie) -> Twit(wolfie, ira))\nforall x (Clock(x, ira) and Clock(x, wolfie) -> Polygynous(wolfie))\nforall x (Twit(x, ira) -> Clock(x, ira))\n\nTwit(wolfie, ira)\n\nTwit(ira, wolfie) and forall x (Twit(x, wolfie) -> Tussle(x, wolfie)) -> therefore Tussle(ira, wolfie) Tussle(ira, wolfie) and forall x (Tussle(x, wolfie) -> Twit(wolfie, ira)) -> therefore Twit(wolfie, ira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The moshe is obsessed. The moshe rend the korie. The korie duck the moshe. If something seethe the korie and it seethe the moshe then the moshe is practical. If something duck the moshe then it rend the moshe. If something is obsessed then it seethe the moshe. If something rend the moshe then the moshe duck the korie. If something seethe the korie and it seethe the moshe then the moshe is sprawly. If something duck the korie then it seethe the korie. The moshe does not like the korie.", "logic": "\nObsessed(moshe)\nRend(moshe, korie)\nDuck(korie, moshe)\nforall x (Seethe(x, korie) and Seethe(x, moshe) -> Practical(moshe))\nforall x (Duck(x, moshe) -> Rend(x, moshe))\nforall x (Obsessed(x) -> Seethe(x, moshe))\nforall x (Rend(x, moshe) -> Duck(moshe, korie))\nforall x (Seethe(x, korie) and Seethe(x, moshe) -> Sprawly(moshe))\nforall x (Duck(x, korie) -> Seethe(x, korie))\n\nnot Duck(moshe, korie)\n\nDuck(korie, moshe) and forall x (Duck(x, moshe) -> Rend(x, moshe)) -> therefore Rend(korie, moshe) Rend(korie, moshe) and forall x (Rend(x, moshe) -> Duck(moshe, korie)) -> therefore Duck(moshe, korie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The jenda is ingrowing. The jenda cere the valeria. The valeria reward the jenda. If something kick the valeria and it kick the jenda then the jenda is unhelpful. If something reward the jenda then it cere the jenda. If something is ingrowing then it kick the jenda. If something cere the jenda then the jenda reward the valeria. If something kick the valeria and it kick the jenda then the jenda is cloisonne. If something reward the valeria then it kick the valeria. The jenda kick the valeria.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(jenda)\nCere(jenda, valeria)\nReward(valeria, jenda)\nforall x (Kick(x, valeria) and Kick(x, jenda) -> Unhelpful(jenda))\nforall x (Reward(x, jenda) -> Cere(x, jenda))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Kick(x, jenda))\nforall x (Cere(x, jenda) -> Reward(jenda, valeria))\nforall x (Kick(x, valeria) and Kick(x, jenda) -> Cloisonne(jenda))\nforall x (Reward(x, valeria) -> Kick(x, valeria))\n\nKick(jenda, valeria)\n\nReward(valeria, jenda) and forall x (Reward(x, jenda) -> Cere(x, jenda)) -> therefore Cere(valeria, jenda) Cere(valeria, jenda) and forall x (Cere(x, jenda) -> Reward(jenda, valeria)) -> therefore Reward(jenda, valeria) Reward(jenda, valeria) and forall x (Reward(x, valeria) -> Kick(x, valeria)) -> therefore Kick(jenda, valeria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The dunstan is hateful. The dunstan subdue the earle. The earle contemn the dunstan. If something abduct the earle and it abduct the dunstan then the dunstan is coaxing. If something contemn the dunstan then it subdue the dunstan. If something is hateful then it abduct the dunstan. If something subdue the dunstan then the dunstan contemn the earle. If something abduct the earle and it abduct the dunstan then the dunstan is triennial. If something contemn the earle then it abduct the earle. The dunstan does not chase the earle.", "logic": "\nHateful(dunstan)\nSubdue(dunstan, earle)\nContemn(earle, dunstan)\nforall x (Abduct(x, earle) and Abduct(x, dunstan) -> Coaxing(dunstan))\nforall x (Contemn(x, dunstan) -> Subdue(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Hateful(x) -> Abduct(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Subdue(x, dunstan) -> Contemn(dunstan, earle))\nforall x (Abduct(x, earle) and Abduct(x, dunstan) -> Triennial(dunstan))\nforall x (Contemn(x, earle) -> Abduct(x, earle))\n\nnot Abduct(dunstan, earle)\n\nContemn(earle, dunstan) and forall x (Contemn(x, dunstan) -> Subdue(x, dunstan)) -> therefore Subdue(earle, dunstan) Subdue(earle, dunstan) and forall x (Subdue(x, dunstan) -> Contemn(dunstan, earle)) -> therefore Contemn(dunstan, earle) Contemn(dunstan, earle) and forall x (Contemn(x, earle) -> Abduct(x, earle)) -> therefore Abduct(dunstan, earle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The neron is unbecoming. The neron noise the malissia. The malissia admeasure the neron. If something shoot the malissia and it shoot the neron then the neron is brunette. If something admeasure the neron then it noise the neron. If something is unbecoming then it shoot the neron. If something noise the neron then the neron admeasure the malissia. If something shoot the malissia and it shoot the neron then the neron is oecumenic. If something admeasure the malissia then it shoot the malissia. The malissia does not chase the neron.", "logic": "\nUnbecoming(neron)\nNoise(neron, malissia)\nAdmeasure(malissia, neron)\nforall x (Shoot(x, malissia) and Shoot(x, neron) -> Brunette(neron))\nforall x (Admeasure(x, neron) -> Noise(x, neron))\nforall x (Unbecoming(x) -> Shoot(x, neron))\nforall x (Noise(x, neron) -> Admeasure(neron, malissia))\nforall x (Shoot(x, malissia) and Shoot(x, neron) -> Oecumenic(neron))\nforall x (Admeasure(x, malissia) -> Shoot(x, malissia))\n\nnot Shoot(malissia, neron)\n\nforall x (Unbecoming(x) -> Shoot(x, neron)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The misty is eldest. The misty carve the noemi. The noemi hearken the misty. If something butt the noemi and it butt the misty then the misty is combed. If something hearken the misty then it carve the misty. If something is eldest then it butt the misty. If something carve the misty then the misty hearken the noemi. If something butt the noemi and it butt the misty then the misty is devalued. If something hearken the noemi then it butt the noemi. The misty carve the misty.", "logic": "\nEldest(misty)\nCarve(misty, noemi)\nHearken(noemi, misty)\nforall x (Butt(x, noemi) and Butt(x, misty) -> Combed(misty))\nforall x (Hearken(x, misty) -> Carve(x, misty))\nforall x (Eldest(x) -> Butt(x, misty))\nforall x (Carve(x, misty) -> Hearken(misty, noemi))\nforall x (Butt(x, noemi) and Butt(x, misty) -> Devalued(misty))\nforall x (Hearken(x, noemi) -> Butt(x, noemi))\n\nCarve(misty, misty)\n\nforall x (Hearken(x, misty) -> Carve(x, misty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The hassan is thumping. The hassan incline the marabel. The marabel improvise the hassan. If something deem the marabel and it deem the hassan then the hassan is comestible. If something improvise the hassan then it incline the hassan. If something is thumping then it deem the hassan. If something incline the hassan then the hassan improvise the marabel. If something deem the marabel and it deem the hassan then the hassan is laputan. If something improvise the marabel then it deem the marabel. The marabel does not chase the marabel.", "logic": "\nThumping(hassan)\nIncline(hassan, marabel)\nImprovise(marabel, hassan)\nforall x (Deem(x, marabel) and Deem(x, hassan) -> Comestible(hassan))\nforall x (Improvise(x, hassan) -> Incline(x, hassan))\nforall x (Thumping(x) -> Deem(x, hassan))\nforall x (Incline(x, hassan) -> Improvise(hassan, marabel))\nforall x (Deem(x, marabel) and Deem(x, hassan) -> Laputan(hassan))\nforall x (Improvise(x, marabel) -> Deem(x, marabel))\n\nnot Deem(marabel, marabel)\n\nforall x (Improvise(x, marabel) -> Deem(x, marabel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The bethena is indexical. The bethena repulse the chrystal. The chrystal idealize the bethena. If something seesaw the chrystal and it seesaw the bethena then the bethena is cadenced. If something idealize the bethena then it repulse the bethena. If something is indexical then it seesaw the bethena. If something repulse the bethena then the bethena idealize the chrystal. If something seesaw the chrystal and it seesaw the bethena then the bethena is uncrannied. If something idealize the chrystal then it seesaw the chrystal. The chrystal is cadenced.", "logic": "\nIndexical(bethena)\nRepulse(bethena, chrystal)\nIdealize(chrystal, bethena)\nforall x (Seesaw(x, chrystal) and Seesaw(x, bethena) -> Cadenced(bethena))\nforall x (Idealize(x, bethena) -> Repulse(x, bethena))\nforall x (Indexical(x) -> Seesaw(x, bethena))\nforall x (Repulse(x, bethena) -> Idealize(bethena, chrystal))\nforall x (Seesaw(x, chrystal) and Seesaw(x, bethena) -> Uncrannied(bethena))\nforall x (Idealize(x, chrystal) -> Seesaw(x, chrystal))\n\nCadenced(chrystal)\n\nCadenced(chrystal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The merl is branchial. The merl avouch the cassandra. The cassandra button the merl. If something yarn the cassandra and it yarn the merl then the merl is incident. If something button the merl then it avouch the merl. If something is branchial then it yarn the merl. If something avouch the merl then the merl button the cassandra. If something yarn the cassandra and it yarn the merl then the merl is metrical. If something button the cassandra then it yarn the cassandra. The merl is not green.", "logic": "\nBranchial(merl)\nAvouch(merl, cassandra)\nButton(cassandra, merl)\nforall x (Yarn(x, cassandra) and Yarn(x, merl) -> Incident(merl))\nforall x (Button(x, merl) -> Avouch(x, merl))\nforall x (Branchial(x) -> Yarn(x, merl))\nforall x (Avouch(x, merl) -> Button(merl, cassandra))\nforall x (Yarn(x, cassandra) and Yarn(x, merl) -> Metrical(merl))\nforall x (Button(x, cassandra) -> Yarn(x, cassandra))\n\nnot Green(merl)\n\nnot Green(merl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The dougie is pert. The dougie hitch the ethelyn. The ethelyn reassemble the dougie. If something curl the ethelyn and it curl the dougie then the dougie is schmalzy. If something reassemble the dougie then it hitch the dougie. If something is pert then it curl the dougie. If something hitch the dougie then the dougie reassemble the ethelyn. If something curl the ethelyn and it curl the dougie then the dougie is subject. If something reassemble the ethelyn then it curl the ethelyn. The ethelyn is pert.", "logic": "\nPert(dougie)\nHitch(dougie, ethelyn)\nReassemble(ethelyn, dougie)\nforall x (Curl(x, ethelyn) and Curl(x, dougie) -> Schmalzy(dougie))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, dougie) -> Hitch(x, dougie))\nforall x (Pert(x) -> Curl(x, dougie))\nforall x (Hitch(x, dougie) -> Reassemble(dougie, ethelyn))\nforall x (Curl(x, ethelyn) and Curl(x, dougie) -> Subject(dougie))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, ethelyn) -> Curl(x, ethelyn))\n\nPert(ethelyn)\n\nPert(ethelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The anabella is earthbound. The anabella remarry the bonny. The bonny dope the anabella. If something clamour the bonny and it clamour the anabella then the anabella is intent. If something dope the anabella then it remarry the anabella. If something is earthbound then it clamour the anabella. If something remarry the anabella then the anabella dope the bonny. If something clamour the bonny and it clamour the anabella then the anabella is ferrous. If something dope the bonny then it clamour the bonny. The bonny does not need the bonny.", "logic": "\nEarthbound(anabella)\nRemarry(anabella, bonny)\nDope(bonny, anabella)\nforall x (Clamour(x, bonny) and Clamour(x, anabella) -> Intent(anabella))\nforall x (Dope(x, anabella) -> Remarry(x, anabella))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) -> Clamour(x, anabella))\nforall x (Remarry(x, anabella) -> Dope(anabella, bonny))\nforall x (Clamour(x, bonny) and Clamour(x, anabella) -> Ferrous(anabella))\nforall x (Dope(x, bonny) -> Clamour(x, bonny))\n\nnot Remarry(bonny, bonny)\n\nnot Remarry(bonny, bonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "The dode is chunky. The dode remarry the riane. The riane consociate the dode. If something panhandle the riane and it panhandle the dode then the dode is organismal. If something consociate the dode then it remarry the dode. If something is chunky then it panhandle the dode. If something remarry the dode then the dode consociate the riane. If something panhandle the riane and it panhandle the dode then the dode is calyculate. If something consociate the riane then it panhandle the riane. The riane is green.", "logic": "\nChunky(dode)\nRemarry(dode, riane)\nConsociate(riane, dode)\nforall x (Panhandle(x, riane) and Panhandle(x, dode) -> Organismal(dode))\nforall x (Consociate(x, dode) -> Remarry(x, dode))\nforall x (Chunky(x) -> Panhandle(x, dode))\nforall x (Remarry(x, dode) -> Consociate(dode, riane))\nforall x (Panhandle(x, riane) and Panhandle(x, dode) -> Calyculate(dode))\nforall x (Consociate(x, riane) -> Panhandle(x, riane))\n\nGreen(riane)\n\nGreen(riane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-158"} {"premises": "Rodina is upbeat. Dorrie is branchless. Teri is bountied. Teri is besieged. Teri is prospering. Atlanta is bountied. Atlanta is branchless. Kind people are presumable. Atlanta is branchless.", "logic": "\nUpbeat(rodina)\nBranchless(dorrie)\nBountied(teri)\nBesieged(teri)\nProspering(teri)\nBountied(atlanta)\nBranchless(atlanta)\nforall x (Branchless(x) -> Presumable(x))\n\nBranchless(atlanta)\n\ntherefore Branchless(atlanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5283"} {"premises": "Patrizia is insular. Anson is labial. Reed is moneyless. Reed is grasping. Reed is homey. Filide is moneyless. Filide is labial. Kind people are pureblood. Reed is not moneyless.", "logic": "\nInsular(patrizia)\nLabial(anson)\nMoneyless(reed)\nGrasping(reed)\nHomey(reed)\nMoneyless(filide)\nLabial(filide)\nforall x (Labial(x) -> Pureblood(x))\n\nnot Moneyless(reed)\n\ntherefore Moneyless(reed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5283"} {"premises": "Leshia is abnaki. Aubrie is sorrel. Chandler is depressed. Chandler is sabbatic. Chandler is unmourned. Mortimer is depressed. Mortimer is sorrel. Kind people are unionised. Leshia is not unionised.", "logic": "\nAbnaki(leshia)\nSorrel(aubrie)\nDepressed(chandler)\nSabbatic(chandler)\nUnmourned(chandler)\nDepressed(mortimer)\nSorrel(mortimer)\nforall x (Sorrel(x) -> Unionised(x))\n\nnot Unionised(leshia)\n\nforall x (Sorrel(x) -> Unionised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5283"} {"premises": "Eleanora is stalwart. Isadora is sufferable. Elyse is subfusc. Elyse is iodinated. Elyse is stealthy. Casandra is subfusc. Casandra is sufferable. Kind people are bryophytic. Eleanora is sufferable.", "logic": "\nStalwart(eleanora)\nSufferable(isadora)\nSubfusc(elyse)\nIodinated(elyse)\nStealthy(elyse)\nSubfusc(casandra)\nSufferable(casandra)\nforall x (Sufferable(x) -> Bryophytic(x))\n\nSufferable(eleanora)\n\nSufferable(eleanora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5283"} {"premises": "Kalvin is orgiastic. Kalvin is not reserved. Kalvin is hindmost. Kalvin is dimmed. Hewie is ennobling. Hewie is hindmost. Hewie is dimmed. Rough people are reserved. All czech people are hindmost. All pyaemic people are hindmost. If Hewie is hindmost and Hewie is reserved then Hewie is not pyaemic. If Kalvin is pyaemic then Kalvin is orgiastic. If someone is orgiastic then they are dimmed. Rough people are dimmed. If someone is ennobling and not pyaemic then they are orgiastic. Kalvin is orgiastic.", "logic": "\nOrgiastic(kalvin)\nnot Reserved(kalvin)\nHindmost(kalvin)\nDimmed(kalvin)\nEnnobling(hewie)\nHindmost(hewie)\nDimmed(hewie)\nforall x (Ennobling(x) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Czech(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nHindmost(hewie) and Reserved(hewie) -> not Pyaemic(hewie)\nPyaemic(kalvin) -> Orgiastic(kalvin)\nforall x (Orgiastic(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) and not Pyaemic(x) -> Orgiastic(x))\n\nOrgiastic(kalvin)\n\ntherefore Orgiastic(kalvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Elsi is woollen. Elsi is not kingly. Elsi is idolized. Elsi is wobbling. Almeda is crummy. Almeda is idolized. Almeda is wobbling. Rough people are kingly. All pyaemic people are idolized. All landlocked people are idolized. If Almeda is idolized and Almeda is kingly then Almeda is not landlocked. If Elsi is landlocked then Elsi is woollen. If someone is woollen then they are wobbling. Rough people are wobbling. If someone is crummy and not landlocked then they are woollen. Elsi is not idolized.", "logic": "\nWoollen(elsi)\nnot Kingly(elsi)\nIdolized(elsi)\nWobbling(elsi)\nCrummy(almeda)\nIdolized(almeda)\nWobbling(almeda)\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Kingly(x))\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Idolized(x))\nforall x (Landlocked(x) -> Idolized(x))\nIdolized(almeda) and Kingly(almeda) -> not Landlocked(almeda)\nLandlocked(elsi) -> Woollen(elsi)\nforall x (Woollen(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Crummy(x) and not Landlocked(x) -> Woollen(x))\n\nnot Idolized(elsi)\n\ntherefore Idolized(elsi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Casi is uniovulate. Casi is not zaftig. Casi is airsick. Casi is offsides. Remington is unaccented. Remington is airsick. Remington is offsides. Rough people are zaftig. All peltate people are airsick. All yeastlike people are airsick. If Remington is airsick and Remington is zaftig then Remington is not yeastlike. If Casi is yeastlike then Casi is uniovulate. If someone is uniovulate then they are offsides. Rough people are offsides. If someone is unaccented and not yeastlike then they are uniovulate. Remington is zaftig.", "logic": "\nUniovulate(casi)\nnot Zaftig(casi)\nAirsick(casi)\nOffsides(casi)\nUnaccented(remington)\nAirsick(remington)\nOffsides(remington)\nforall x (Unaccented(x) -> Zaftig(x))\nforall x (Peltate(x) -> Airsick(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Airsick(x))\nAirsick(remington) and Zaftig(remington) -> not Yeastlike(remington)\nYeastlike(casi) -> Uniovulate(casi)\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Unaccented(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Unaccented(x) and not Yeastlike(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\n\nZaftig(remington)\n\nUnaccented(remington) and forall x (Unaccented(x) -> Zaftig(x)) -> therefore Zaftig(remington)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Dennie is uncomplete. Dennie is not sole. Dennie is western. Dennie is unsold. Deonne is alveolar. Deonne is western. Deonne is unsold. Rough people are sole. All raunchy people are western. All farther people are western. If Deonne is western and Deonne is sole then Deonne is not farther. If Dennie is farther then Dennie is uncomplete. If someone is uncomplete then they are unsold. Rough people are unsold. If someone is alveolar and not farther then they are uncomplete. Deonne is not sole.", "logic": "\nUncomplete(dennie)\nnot Sole(dennie)\nWestern(dennie)\nUnsold(dennie)\nAlveolar(deonne)\nWestern(deonne)\nUnsold(deonne)\nforall x (Alveolar(x) -> Sole(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Western(x))\nforall x (Farther(x) -> Western(x))\nWestern(deonne) and Sole(deonne) -> not Farther(deonne)\nFarther(dennie) -> Uncomplete(dennie)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Unsold(x))\nforall x (Alveolar(x) -> Unsold(x))\nforall x (Alveolar(x) and not Farther(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\n\nnot Sole(deonne)\n\nAlveolar(deonne) and forall x (Alveolar(x) -> Sole(x)) -> therefore Sole(deonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Robbyn is excessive. Robbyn is not sedulous. Robbyn is fringed. Robbyn is cyprian. Kalil is mini. Kalil is fringed. Kalil is cyprian. Rough people are sedulous. All nebular people are fringed. All submissive people are fringed. If Kalil is fringed and Kalil is sedulous then Kalil is not submissive. If Robbyn is submissive then Robbyn is excessive. If someone is excessive then they are cyprian. Rough people are cyprian. If someone is mini and not submissive then they are excessive. Kalil is not submissive.", "logic": "\nExcessive(robbyn)\nnot Sedulous(robbyn)\nFringed(robbyn)\nCyprian(robbyn)\nMini(kalil)\nFringed(kalil)\nCyprian(kalil)\nforall x (Mini(x) -> Sedulous(x))\nforall x (Nebular(x) -> Fringed(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) -> Fringed(x))\nFringed(kalil) and Sedulous(kalil) -> not Submissive(kalil)\nSubmissive(robbyn) -> Excessive(robbyn)\nforall x (Excessive(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Mini(x) -> Cyprian(x))\nforall x (Mini(x) and not Submissive(x) -> Excessive(x))\n\nnot Submissive(kalil)\n\nMini(kalil) and forall x (Mini(x) -> Sedulous(x)) -> therefore Sedulous(kalil) Fringed(kalil) and Sedulous(kalil) and Fringed(kalil) and Sedulous(kalil) -> not Submissive(kalil) -> therefore not Submissive(kalil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Elane is peremptory. Elane is not redemptory. Elane is seraphical. Elane is fourfold. Mylo is undeterred. Mylo is seraphical. Mylo is fourfold. Rough people are redemptory. All unendowed people are seraphical. All cretinous people are seraphical. If Mylo is seraphical and Mylo is redemptory then Mylo is not cretinous. If Elane is cretinous then Elane is peremptory. If someone is peremptory then they are fourfold. Rough people are fourfold. If someone is undeterred and not cretinous then they are peremptory. Mylo is cretinous.", "logic": "\nPeremptory(elane)\nnot Redemptory(elane)\nSeraphical(elane)\nFourfold(elane)\nUndeterred(mylo)\nSeraphical(mylo)\nFourfold(mylo)\nforall x (Undeterred(x) -> Redemptory(x))\nforall x (Unendowed(x) -> Seraphical(x))\nforall x (Cretinous(x) -> Seraphical(x))\nSeraphical(mylo) and Redemptory(mylo) -> not Cretinous(mylo)\nCretinous(elane) -> Peremptory(elane)\nforall x (Peremptory(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nforall x (Undeterred(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nforall x (Undeterred(x) and not Cretinous(x) -> Peremptory(x))\n\nCretinous(mylo)\n\nUndeterred(mylo) and forall x (Undeterred(x) -> Redemptory(x)) -> therefore Redemptory(mylo) Seraphical(mylo) and Redemptory(mylo) and Seraphical(mylo) and Redemptory(mylo) -> not Cretinous(mylo) -> therefore not Cretinous(mylo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Kathrine is tubed. Kathrine is not awry. Kathrine is untuneful. Kathrine is whippy. Ignace is illative. Ignace is untuneful. Ignace is whippy. Rough people are awry. All cognitive people are untuneful. All misrelated people are untuneful. If Ignace is untuneful and Ignace is awry then Ignace is not misrelated. If Kathrine is misrelated then Kathrine is tubed. If someone is tubed then they are whippy. Rough people are whippy. If someone is illative and not misrelated then they are tubed. Ignace is tubed.", "logic": "\nTubed(kathrine)\nnot Awry(kathrine)\nUntuneful(kathrine)\nWhippy(kathrine)\nIllative(ignace)\nUntuneful(ignace)\nWhippy(ignace)\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Awry(x))\nforall x (Cognitive(x) -> Untuneful(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) -> Untuneful(x))\nUntuneful(ignace) and Awry(ignace) -> not Misrelated(ignace)\nMisrelated(kathrine) -> Tubed(kathrine)\nforall x (Tubed(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Illative(x) and not Misrelated(x) -> Tubed(x))\n\nTubed(ignace)\n\nIllative(ignace) and forall x (Illative(x) -> Awry(x)) -> therefore Awry(ignace) Untuneful(ignace) and Awry(ignace) and Untuneful(ignace) and Awry(ignace) -> not Misrelated(ignace) -> therefore not Misrelated(ignace) Illative(ignace) and not Misrelated(ignace) and forall x (Illative(x) and not Misrelated(x) -> Tubed(x)) -> therefore Tubed(ignace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Broderick is ghastly. Broderick is not cultural. Broderick is numeric. Broderick is elating. Rheta is stung. Rheta is numeric. Rheta is elating. Rough people are cultural. All attractive people are numeric. All korean people are numeric. If Rheta is numeric and Rheta is cultural then Rheta is not korean. If Broderick is korean then Broderick is ghastly. If someone is ghastly then they are elating. Rough people are elating. If someone is stung and not korean then they are ghastly. Rheta is not ghastly.", "logic": "\nGhastly(broderick)\nnot Cultural(broderick)\nNumeric(broderick)\nElating(broderick)\nStung(rheta)\nNumeric(rheta)\nElating(rheta)\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Cultural(x))\nforall x (Attractive(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Korean(x) -> Numeric(x))\nNumeric(rheta) and Cultural(rheta) -> not Korean(rheta)\nKorean(broderick) -> Ghastly(broderick)\nforall x (Ghastly(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) and not Korean(x) -> Ghastly(x))\n\nnot Ghastly(rheta)\n\nStung(rheta) and forall x (Stung(x) -> Cultural(x)) -> therefore Cultural(rheta) Numeric(rheta) and Cultural(rheta) and Numeric(rheta) and Cultural(rheta) -> not Korean(rheta) -> therefore not Korean(rheta) Stung(rheta) and not Korean(rheta) and forall x (Stung(x) and not Korean(x) -> Ghastly(x)) -> therefore Ghastly(rheta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Locke is threaded. Locke is not lxxvii. Locke is windy. Locke is amharic. Sonja is octagonal. Sonja is windy. Sonja is amharic. Rough people are lxxvii. All composed people are windy. All hygienical people are windy. If Sonja is windy and Sonja is lxxvii then Sonja is not hygienical. If Locke is hygienical then Locke is threaded. If someone is threaded then they are amharic. Rough people are amharic. If someone is octagonal and not hygienical then they are threaded. Locke is not hygienical.", "logic": "\nThreaded(locke)\nnot Lxxvii(locke)\nWindy(locke)\nAmharic(locke)\nOctagonal(sonja)\nWindy(sonja)\nAmharic(sonja)\nforall x (Octagonal(x) -> Lxxvii(x))\nforall x (Composed(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) -> Windy(x))\nWindy(sonja) and Lxxvii(sonja) -> not Hygienical(sonja)\nHygienical(locke) -> Threaded(locke)\nforall x (Threaded(x) -> Amharic(x))\nforall x (Octagonal(x) -> Amharic(x))\nforall x (Octagonal(x) and not Hygienical(x) -> Threaded(x))\n\nnot Hygienical(locke)\n\nnot Hygienical(locke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Simeon is patriotic. Simeon is not monoclonal. Simeon is rhymeless. Simeon is evaporated. Donnie is unripened. Donnie is rhymeless. Donnie is evaporated. Rough people are monoclonal. All rabbinical people are rhymeless. All whiplike people are rhymeless. If Donnie is rhymeless and Donnie is monoclonal then Donnie is not whiplike. If Simeon is whiplike then Simeon is patriotic. If someone is patriotic then they are evaporated. Rough people are evaporated. If someone is unripened and not whiplike then they are patriotic. Simeon is rabbinical.", "logic": "\nPatriotic(simeon)\nnot Monoclonal(simeon)\nRhymeless(simeon)\nEvaporated(simeon)\nUnripened(donnie)\nRhymeless(donnie)\nEvaporated(donnie)\nforall x (Unripened(x) -> Monoclonal(x))\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nforall x (Whiplike(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nRhymeless(donnie) and Monoclonal(donnie) -> not Whiplike(donnie)\nWhiplike(simeon) -> Patriotic(simeon)\nforall x (Patriotic(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Unripened(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Unripened(x) and not Whiplike(x) -> Patriotic(x))\n\nRabbinical(simeon)\n\nRabbinical(simeon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Shamus is rubicund. Shamus is not additive. Shamus is chalky. Shamus is laborious. Bennett is hypethral. Bennett is chalky. Bennett is laborious. Rough people are additive. All adient people are chalky. All haywire people are chalky. If Bennett is chalky and Bennett is additive then Bennett is not haywire. If Shamus is haywire then Shamus is rubicund. If someone is rubicund then they are laborious. Rough people are laborious. If someone is hypethral and not haywire then they are rubicund. Bennett is not adient.", "logic": "\nRubicund(shamus)\nnot Additive(shamus)\nChalky(shamus)\nLaborious(shamus)\nHypethral(bennett)\nChalky(bennett)\nLaborious(bennett)\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> Additive(x))\nforall x (Adient(x) -> Chalky(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Chalky(x))\nChalky(bennett) and Additive(bennett) -> not Haywire(bennett)\nHaywire(shamus) -> Rubicund(shamus)\nforall x (Rubicund(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) and not Haywire(x) -> Rubicund(x))\n\nnot Adient(bennett)\n\nnot Adient(bennett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Gregorio is taboo. Gregorio is not myelinated. Gregorio is five. Gregorio is viennese. Urban is decisive. Urban is five. Urban is viennese. Rough people are myelinated. All orange people are five. All ungainly people are five. If Urban is five and Urban is myelinated then Urban is not ungainly. If Gregorio is ungainly then Gregorio is taboo. If someone is taboo then they are viennese. Rough people are viennese. If someone is decisive and not ungainly then they are taboo. Gregorio is decisive.", "logic": "\nTaboo(gregorio)\nnot Myelinated(gregorio)\nFive(gregorio)\nViennese(gregorio)\nDecisive(urban)\nFive(urban)\nViennese(urban)\nforall x (Decisive(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Orange(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Ungainly(x) -> Five(x))\nFive(urban) and Myelinated(urban) -> not Ungainly(urban)\nUngainly(gregorio) -> Taboo(gregorio)\nforall x (Taboo(x) -> Viennese(x))\nforall x (Decisive(x) -> Viennese(x))\nforall x (Decisive(x) and not Ungainly(x) -> Taboo(x))\n\nDecisive(gregorio)\n\nDecisive(gregorio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-786"} {"premises": "Kendre is ingrowing. Kendre is not empirical. Kendre is not isothermic. Kendre is botulinal. Kendre is romantic. Kendre is pulseless. Ulla is ingrowing. Ulla is isoclinic. Ulla is not empirical. Ulla is isothermic. Ulla is botulinal. Ulla is romantic. Ulla is pulseless. Nettie is ingrowing. Nettie is isoclinic. Nettie is not isothermic. All isoclinic people are botulinal. If Kendre is romantic and Kendre is not isoclinic then Kendre is pulseless. If Ulla is pulseless and Ulla is romantic then Ulla is ingrowing. Ulla is romantic.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(kendre)\nnot Empirical(kendre)\nnot Isothermic(kendre)\nBotulinal(kendre)\nRomantic(kendre)\nPulseless(kendre)\nIngrowing(ulla)\nIsoclinic(ulla)\nnot Empirical(ulla)\nIsothermic(ulla)\nBotulinal(ulla)\nRomantic(ulla)\nPulseless(ulla)\nIngrowing(nettie)\nIsoclinic(nettie)\nnot Isothermic(nettie)\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nRomantic(kendre) and not Isoclinic(kendre) -> Pulseless(kendre)\nPulseless(ulla) and Romantic(ulla) -> Ingrowing(ulla)\n\nRomantic(ulla)\n\ntherefore Romantic(ulla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Samara is overhand. Samara is not gilbertian. Samara is not honorable. Samara is overlooked. Samara is gaelic. Samara is damaged. Leontine is overhand. Leontine is tutelar. Leontine is not gilbertian. Leontine is honorable. Leontine is overlooked. Leontine is gaelic. Leontine is damaged. Denice is overhand. Denice is tutelar. Denice is not honorable. All tutelar people are overlooked. If Samara is gaelic and Samara is not tutelar then Samara is damaged. If Leontine is damaged and Leontine is gaelic then Leontine is overhand. Leontine is not damaged.", "logic": "\nOverhand(samara)\nnot Gilbertian(samara)\nnot Honorable(samara)\nOverlooked(samara)\nGaelic(samara)\nDamaged(samara)\nOverhand(leontine)\nTutelar(leontine)\nnot Gilbertian(leontine)\nHonorable(leontine)\nOverlooked(leontine)\nGaelic(leontine)\nDamaged(leontine)\nOverhand(denice)\nTutelar(denice)\nnot Honorable(denice)\nforall x (Tutelar(x) -> Overlooked(x))\nGaelic(samara) and not Tutelar(samara) -> Damaged(samara)\nDamaged(leontine) and Gaelic(leontine) -> Overhand(leontine)\n\nnot Damaged(leontine)\n\ntherefore Damaged(leontine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Wallie is rotund. Wallie is not brownish. Wallie is not fractional. Wallie is cruciform. Wallie is legal. Wallie is minute. Crawford is rotund. Crawford is defoliated. Crawford is not brownish. Crawford is fractional. Crawford is cruciform. Crawford is legal. Crawford is minute. Brendan is rotund. Brendan is defoliated. Brendan is not fractional. All defoliated people are cruciform. If Wallie is legal and Wallie is not defoliated then Wallie is minute. If Crawford is minute and Crawford is legal then Crawford is rotund. Brendan is cruciform.", "logic": "\nRotund(wallie)\nnot Brownish(wallie)\nnot Fractional(wallie)\nCruciform(wallie)\nLegal(wallie)\nMinute(wallie)\nRotund(crawford)\nDefoliated(crawford)\nnot Brownish(crawford)\nFractional(crawford)\nCruciform(crawford)\nLegal(crawford)\nMinute(crawford)\nRotund(brendan)\nDefoliated(brendan)\nnot Fractional(brendan)\nforall x (Defoliated(x) -> Cruciform(x))\nLegal(wallie) and not Defoliated(wallie) -> Minute(wallie)\nMinute(crawford) and Legal(crawford) -> Rotund(crawford)\n\nCruciform(brendan)\n\nDefoliated(brendan) and forall x (Defoliated(x) -> Cruciform(x)) -> therefore Cruciform(brendan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Herb is afire. Herb is not ungusseted. Herb is not dishonest. Herb is unthawed. Herb is atheist. Herb is cleavable. Gwenn is afire. Gwenn is touchy. Gwenn is not ungusseted. Gwenn is dishonest. Gwenn is unthawed. Gwenn is atheist. Gwenn is cleavable. Leticia is afire. Leticia is touchy. Leticia is not dishonest. All touchy people are unthawed. If Herb is atheist and Herb is not touchy then Herb is cleavable. If Gwenn is cleavable and Gwenn is atheist then Gwenn is afire. Leticia is not unthawed.", "logic": "\nAfire(herb)\nnot Ungusseted(herb)\nnot Dishonest(herb)\nUnthawed(herb)\nAtheist(herb)\nCleavable(herb)\nAfire(gwenn)\nTouchy(gwenn)\nnot Ungusseted(gwenn)\nDishonest(gwenn)\nUnthawed(gwenn)\nAtheist(gwenn)\nCleavable(gwenn)\nAfire(leticia)\nTouchy(leticia)\nnot Dishonest(leticia)\nforall x (Touchy(x) -> Unthawed(x))\nAtheist(herb) and not Touchy(herb) -> Cleavable(herb)\nCleavable(gwenn) and Atheist(gwenn) -> Afire(gwenn)\n\nnot Unthawed(leticia)\n\nTouchy(leticia) and forall x (Touchy(x) -> Unthawed(x)) -> therefore Unthawed(leticia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Rozella is edacious. Rozella is not faraway. Rozella is not detectable. Rozella is covered. Rozella is sardonic. Rozella is raised. Vasili is edacious. Vasili is spiderly. Vasili is not faraway. Vasili is detectable. Vasili is covered. Vasili is sardonic. Vasili is raised. Sancho is edacious. Sancho is spiderly. Sancho is not detectable. All spiderly people are covered. If Rozella is sardonic and Rozella is not spiderly then Rozella is raised. If Vasili is raised and Vasili is sardonic then Vasili is edacious. Rozella is not spiderly.", "logic": "\nEdacious(rozella)\nnot Faraway(rozella)\nnot Detectable(rozella)\nCovered(rozella)\nSardonic(rozella)\nRaised(rozella)\nEdacious(vasili)\nSpiderly(vasili)\nnot Faraway(vasili)\nDetectable(vasili)\nCovered(vasili)\nSardonic(vasili)\nRaised(vasili)\nEdacious(sancho)\nSpiderly(sancho)\nnot Detectable(sancho)\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Covered(x))\nSardonic(rozella) and not Spiderly(rozella) -> Raised(rozella)\nRaised(vasili) and Sardonic(vasili) -> Edacious(vasili)\n\nnot Spiderly(rozella)\n\nnot Spiderly(rozella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Katharyn is wary. Katharyn is not parental. Katharyn is not humble. Katharyn is gaunt. Katharyn is scrivened. Katharyn is wrapped. Cleopatra is wary. Cleopatra is orbital. Cleopatra is not parental. Cleopatra is humble. Cleopatra is gaunt. Cleopatra is scrivened. Cleopatra is wrapped. Nissa is wary. Nissa is orbital. Nissa is not humble. All orbital people are gaunt. If Katharyn is scrivened and Katharyn is not orbital then Katharyn is wrapped. If Cleopatra is wrapped and Cleopatra is scrivened then Cleopatra is wary. Nissa is scrivened.", "logic": "\nWary(katharyn)\nnot Parental(katharyn)\nnot Humble(katharyn)\nGaunt(katharyn)\nScrivened(katharyn)\nWrapped(katharyn)\nWary(cleopatra)\nOrbital(cleopatra)\nnot Parental(cleopatra)\nHumble(cleopatra)\nGaunt(cleopatra)\nScrivened(cleopatra)\nWrapped(cleopatra)\nWary(nissa)\nOrbital(nissa)\nnot Humble(nissa)\nforall x (Orbital(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nScrivened(katharyn) and not Orbital(katharyn) -> Wrapped(katharyn)\nWrapped(cleopatra) and Scrivened(cleopatra) -> Wary(cleopatra)\n\nScrivened(nissa)\n\nScrivened(nissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Quigly is aggregate. Quigly is not sixtieth. Quigly is not mercurial. Quigly is tuppeny. Quigly is hardfisted. Quigly is bottomless. Stirling is aggregate. Stirling is piercing. Stirling is not sixtieth. Stirling is mercurial. Stirling is tuppeny. Stirling is hardfisted. Stirling is bottomless. Anatoly is aggregate. Anatoly is piercing. Anatoly is not mercurial. All piercing people are tuppeny. If Quigly is hardfisted and Quigly is not piercing then Quigly is bottomless. If Stirling is bottomless and Stirling is hardfisted then Stirling is aggregate. Anatoly is not bottomless.", "logic": "\nAggregate(quigly)\nnot Sixtieth(quigly)\nnot Mercurial(quigly)\nTuppeny(quigly)\nHardfisted(quigly)\nBottomless(quigly)\nAggregate(stirling)\nPiercing(stirling)\nnot Sixtieth(stirling)\nMercurial(stirling)\nTuppeny(stirling)\nHardfisted(stirling)\nBottomless(stirling)\nAggregate(anatoly)\nPiercing(anatoly)\nnot Mercurial(anatoly)\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Tuppeny(x))\nHardfisted(quigly) and not Piercing(quigly) -> Bottomless(quigly)\nBottomless(stirling) and Hardfisted(stirling) -> Aggregate(stirling)\n\nnot Bottomless(anatoly)\n\nnot Bottomless(anatoly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Lola is orthodox. Lola is not rending. Lola is not autologous. Lola is dogging. Lola is bigmouthed. Lola is lengthwise. Rana is orthodox. Rana is xeric. Rana is not rending. Rana is autologous. Rana is dogging. Rana is bigmouthed. Rana is lengthwise. Jethro is orthodox. Jethro is xeric. Jethro is not autologous. All xeric people are dogging. If Lola is bigmouthed and Lola is not xeric then Lola is lengthwise. If Rana is lengthwise and Rana is bigmouthed then Rana is orthodox. Jethro is rending.", "logic": "\nOrthodox(lola)\nnot Rending(lola)\nnot Autologous(lola)\nDogging(lola)\nBigmouthed(lola)\nLengthwise(lola)\nOrthodox(rana)\nXeric(rana)\nnot Rending(rana)\nAutologous(rana)\nDogging(rana)\nBigmouthed(rana)\nLengthwise(rana)\nOrthodox(jethro)\nXeric(jethro)\nnot Autologous(jethro)\nforall x (Xeric(x) -> Dogging(x))\nBigmouthed(lola) and not Xeric(lola) -> Lengthwise(lola)\nLengthwise(rana) and Bigmouthed(rana) -> Orthodox(rana)\n\nRending(jethro)\n\nRending(jethro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2084"} {"premises": "Bel is tiered. Bel is sublimated. Bel is pumped. Vail is pumped. Vail is agnostical. Vail is gold. Barde is pumped. Oswell is tiered. Oswell is achenial. Oswell is gold. Big, pumped people are corrugated. All corrugated people are gold. Vail is gold.", "logic": "\nTiered(bel)\nSublimated(bel)\nPumped(bel)\nPumped(vail)\nAgnostical(vail)\nGold(vail)\nPumped(barde)\nTiered(oswell)\nAchenial(oswell)\nGold(oswell)\nforall x (Tiered(x) and Pumped(x) -> Corrugated(x))\nforall x (Corrugated(x) -> Gold(x))\n\nGold(vail)\n\ntherefore Gold(vail)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Mirilla is foster. Mirilla is impassive. Mirilla is sartorial. Nariko is sartorial. Nariko is syllabic. Nariko is tactile. Lev is sartorial. Gussi is foster. Gussi is homocyclic. Gussi is tactile. Big, sartorial people are missional. All missional people are tactile. Gussi is not foster.", "logic": "\nFoster(mirilla)\nImpassive(mirilla)\nSartorial(mirilla)\nSartorial(nariko)\nSyllabic(nariko)\nTactile(nariko)\nSartorial(lev)\nFoster(gussi)\nHomocyclic(gussi)\nTactile(gussi)\nforall x (Foster(x) and Sartorial(x) -> Missional(x))\nforall x (Missional(x) -> Tactile(x))\n\nnot Foster(gussi)\n\ntherefore Foster(gussi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Annalisa is blate. Annalisa is batwing. Annalisa is attic. Biff is attic. Biff is blest. Biff is resonating. Kalle is attic. Hogan is blate. Hogan is maledict. Hogan is resonating. Big, attic people are hotheaded. All hotheaded people are resonating. Annalisa is hotheaded.", "logic": "\nBlate(annalisa)\nBatwing(annalisa)\nAttic(annalisa)\nAttic(biff)\nBlest(biff)\nResonating(biff)\nAttic(kalle)\nBlate(hogan)\nMaledict(hogan)\nResonating(hogan)\nforall x (Blate(x) and Attic(x) -> Hotheaded(x))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Resonating(x))\n\nHotheaded(annalisa)\n\nBlate(annalisa) and Attic(annalisa) and forall x (Blate(x) and Attic(x) -> Hotheaded(x)) -> therefore Hotheaded(annalisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Shayna is pizzicato. Shayna is medieval. Shayna is calculous. Joshua is calculous. Joshua is forficate. Joshua is littered. Knox is calculous. Dita is pizzicato. Dita is cadastral. Dita is littered. Big, calculous people are sacred. All sacred people are littered. Shayna is not sacred.", "logic": "\nPizzicato(shayna)\nMedieval(shayna)\nCalculous(shayna)\nCalculous(joshua)\nForficate(joshua)\nLittered(joshua)\nCalculous(knox)\nPizzicato(dita)\nCadastral(dita)\nLittered(dita)\nforall x (Pizzicato(x) and Calculous(x) -> Sacred(x))\nforall x (Sacred(x) -> Littered(x))\n\nnot Sacred(shayna)\n\nPizzicato(shayna) and Calculous(shayna) and forall x (Pizzicato(x) and Calculous(x) -> Sacred(x)) -> therefore Sacred(shayna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Istvan is logistic. Istvan is onstage. Istvan is super. Cristina is super. Cristina is mangled. Cristina is preachy. Garnet is super. Ashely is logistic. Ashely is sewed. Ashely is preachy. Big, super people are debasing. All debasing people are preachy. Istvan is preachy.", "logic": "\nLogistic(istvan)\nOnstage(istvan)\nSuper(istvan)\nSuper(cristina)\nMangled(cristina)\nPreachy(cristina)\nSuper(garnet)\nLogistic(ashely)\nSewed(ashely)\nPreachy(ashely)\nforall x (Logistic(x) and Super(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Debasing(x) -> Preachy(x))\n\nPreachy(istvan)\n\nLogistic(istvan) and Super(istvan) and forall x (Logistic(x) and Super(x) -> Debasing(x)) -> therefore Debasing(istvan) Debasing(istvan) and forall x (Debasing(x) -> Preachy(x)) -> therefore Preachy(istvan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Sharra is missed. Sharra is bereaved. Sharra is acapnial. Norris is acapnial. Norris is bladdery. Norris is equitable. Kia is acapnial. Hollis is missed. Hollis is aching. Hollis is equitable. Big, acapnial people are statewide. All statewide people are equitable. Sharra is not equitable.", "logic": "\nMissed(sharra)\nBereaved(sharra)\nAcapnial(sharra)\nAcapnial(norris)\nBladdery(norris)\nEquitable(norris)\nAcapnial(kia)\nMissed(hollis)\nAching(hollis)\nEquitable(hollis)\nforall x (Missed(x) and Acapnial(x) -> Statewide(x))\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> Equitable(x))\n\nnot Equitable(sharra)\n\nMissed(sharra) and Acapnial(sharra) and forall x (Missed(x) and Acapnial(x) -> Statewide(x)) -> therefore Statewide(sharra) Statewide(sharra) and forall x (Statewide(x) -> Equitable(x)) -> therefore Equitable(sharra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Rhetta is hypnogogic. Rhetta is philistine. Rhetta is swedish. Moina is swedish. Moina is fuddled. Moina is nonhuman. Jesse is swedish. Hansel is hypnogogic. Hansel is demure. Hansel is nonhuman. Big, swedish people are soulless. All soulless people are nonhuman. Jesse is not soulless.", "logic": "\nHypnogogic(rhetta)\nPhilistine(rhetta)\nSwedish(rhetta)\nSwedish(moina)\nFuddled(moina)\nNonhuman(moina)\nSwedish(jesse)\nHypnogogic(hansel)\nDemure(hansel)\nNonhuman(hansel)\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Swedish(x) -> Soulless(x))\nforall x (Soulless(x) -> Nonhuman(x))\n\nnot Soulless(jesse)\n\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Swedish(x) -> Soulless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Carrie is xliv. Carrie is unvarying. Carrie is catechetic. Dawson is catechetic. Dawson is wanted. Dawson is antebellum. Darian is catechetic. Aleen is xliv. Aleen is derogatory. Aleen is antebellum. Big, catechetic people are seaward. All seaward people are antebellum. Dawson is seaward.", "logic": "\nXliv(carrie)\nUnvarying(carrie)\nCatechetic(carrie)\nCatechetic(dawson)\nWanted(dawson)\nAntebellum(dawson)\nCatechetic(darian)\nXliv(aleen)\nDerogatory(aleen)\nAntebellum(aleen)\nforall x (Xliv(x) and Catechetic(x) -> Seaward(x))\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Antebellum(x))\n\nSeaward(dawson)\n\nforall x (Xliv(x) and Catechetic(x) -> Seaward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Paolina is mutative. Paolina is grown. Paolina is pleased. Dehlia is pleased. Dehlia is repugnant. Dehlia is isosceles. Paola is pleased. Mario is mutative. Mario is amphibious. Mario is isosceles. Big, pleased people are costate. All costate people are isosceles. Paola is not isosceles.", "logic": "\nMutative(paolina)\nGrown(paolina)\nPleased(paolina)\nPleased(dehlia)\nRepugnant(dehlia)\nIsosceles(dehlia)\nPleased(paola)\nMutative(mario)\nAmphibious(mario)\nIsosceles(mario)\nforall x (Mutative(x) and Pleased(x) -> Costate(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) -> Isosceles(x))\n\nnot Isosceles(paola)\n\nforall x (Costate(x) -> Isosceles(x)) <- forall x (Mutative(x) and Pleased(x) -> Costate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Kirby is torn. Kirby is alveolate. Kirby is pied. Ivy is pied. Ivy is zygomatic. Ivy is after. Dedie is pied. Stillman is torn. Stillman is unassured. Stillman is after. Big, pied people are pessimal. All pessimal people are after. Ivy is alveolate.", "logic": "\nTorn(kirby)\nAlveolate(kirby)\nPied(kirby)\nPied(ivy)\nZygomatic(ivy)\nAfter(ivy)\nPied(dedie)\nTorn(stillman)\nUnassured(stillman)\nAfter(stillman)\nforall x (Torn(x) and Pied(x) -> Pessimal(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> After(x))\n\nAlveolate(ivy)\n\nAlveolate(ivy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Mercie is pharisaic. Mercie is pyrolytic. Mercie is sterile. Prince is sterile. Prince is choral. Prince is shattered. Monika is sterile. Bria is pharisaic. Bria is recessive. Bria is shattered. Big, sterile people are ornate. All ornate people are shattered. Bria is not sterile.", "logic": "\nPharisaic(mercie)\nPyrolytic(mercie)\nSterile(mercie)\nSterile(prince)\nChoral(prince)\nShattered(prince)\nSterile(monika)\nPharisaic(bria)\nRecessive(bria)\nShattered(bria)\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) and Sterile(x) -> Ornate(x))\nforall x (Ornate(x) -> Shattered(x))\n\nnot Sterile(bria)\n\nnot Sterile(bria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Ilka is notifiable. Ilka is lowest. Ilka is glimmery. Karyn is glimmery. Karyn is brave. Karyn is balanced. Giuseppe is glimmery. Tina is notifiable. Tina is satiny. Tina is balanced. Big, glimmery people are slowgoing. All slowgoing people are balanced. Karyn is notifiable.", "logic": "\nNotifiable(ilka)\nLowest(ilka)\nGlimmery(ilka)\nGlimmery(karyn)\nBrave(karyn)\nBalanced(karyn)\nGlimmery(giuseppe)\nNotifiable(tina)\nSatiny(tina)\nBalanced(tina)\nforall x (Notifiable(x) and Glimmery(x) -> Slowgoing(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Balanced(x))\n\nNotifiable(karyn)\n\nNotifiable(karyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-934"} {"premises": "Ethan is feisty. Ethan is sanguine. Ethan is apodal. Ethan is broadside. Ethan is side. Ethan is secretory. Ethan is mutative. Maridel is feisty. Maridel is sanguine. Maridel is apodal. Maridel is broadside. Maridel is side. Maridel is secretory. Maridel is mutative. Red people are broadside. All secretory, side people are apodal. If someone is secretory and feisty then they are apodal. Ethan is sanguine.", "logic": "\nFeisty(ethan)\nSanguine(ethan)\nApodal(ethan)\nBroadside(ethan)\nSide(ethan)\nSecretory(ethan)\nMutative(ethan)\nFeisty(maridel)\nSanguine(maridel)\nApodal(maridel)\nBroadside(maridel)\nSide(maridel)\nSecretory(maridel)\nMutative(maridel)\nforall x (Side(x) -> Broadside(x))\nforall x (Secretory(x) and Side(x) -> Apodal(x))\nforall x (Secretory(x) and Feisty(x) -> Apodal(x))\n\nSanguine(ethan)\n\ntherefore Sanguine(ethan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6752"} {"premises": "Kissie is adoptive. Kissie is trusty. Kissie is thunderous. Kissie is rustic. Kissie is bibliotic. Kissie is pulverised. Kissie is salverform. Peg is adoptive. Peg is trusty. Peg is thunderous. Peg is rustic. Peg is bibliotic. Peg is pulverised. Peg is salverform. Red people are rustic. All pulverised, bibliotic people are thunderous. If someone is pulverised and adoptive then they are thunderous. Kissie is not pulverised.", "logic": "\nAdoptive(kissie)\nTrusty(kissie)\nThunderous(kissie)\nRustic(kissie)\nBibliotic(kissie)\nPulverised(kissie)\nSalverform(kissie)\nAdoptive(peg)\nTrusty(peg)\nThunderous(peg)\nRustic(peg)\nBibliotic(peg)\nPulverised(peg)\nSalverform(peg)\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) -> Rustic(x))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) and Bibliotic(x) -> Thunderous(x))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) and Adoptive(x) -> Thunderous(x))\n\nnot Pulverised(kissie)\n\ntherefore Pulverised(kissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6752"} {"premises": "Glynis is dipterous. Glynis is ramshackle. Penelopa is unforeseen. Penelopa is mindful. Norrie is maoist. Jilleen is amort. Jilleen is mindful. Smart, amort people are dipterous. Smart, ramshackle people are dipterous. Rough people are ramshackle. If Jilleen is freshman then Jilleen is unforeseen. If Glynis is ramshackle then Glynis is unforeseen. Blue, maoist people are amort. Rough people are not freshman. If Jilleen is freshman then Jilleen is dipterous. Jilleen is amort.", "logic": "\nDipterous(glynis)\nRamshackle(glynis)\nUnforeseen(penelopa)\nMindful(penelopa)\nMaoist(norrie)\nAmort(jilleen)\nMindful(jilleen)\nforall x (Mindful(x) and Amort(x) -> Dipterous(x))\nforall x (Mindful(x) and Ramshackle(x) -> Dipterous(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> Ramshackle(x))\nFreshman(jilleen) -> Unforeseen(jilleen)\nRamshackle(glynis) -> Unforeseen(glynis)\nforall x (Freshman(x) and Maoist(x) -> Amort(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> not Freshman(x))\nFreshman(jilleen) -> Dipterous(jilleen)\n\nAmort(jilleen)\n\ntherefore Amort(jilleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6463"} {"premises": "Fritz is uptight. Fritz is scythian. Polly is lone. Polly is terrene. Claudio is abortive. Neda is inculpable. Neda is terrene. Smart, inculpable people are uptight. Smart, scythian people are uptight. Rough people are scythian. If Neda is pricy then Neda is lone. If Fritz is scythian then Fritz is lone. Blue, abortive people are inculpable. Rough people are not pricy. If Neda is pricy then Neda is uptight. Claudio is not abortive.", "logic": "\nUptight(fritz)\nScythian(fritz)\nLone(polly)\nTerrene(polly)\nAbortive(claudio)\nInculpable(neda)\nTerrene(neda)\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Inculpable(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Scythian(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Abortive(x) -> Scythian(x))\nPricy(neda) -> Lone(neda)\nScythian(fritz) -> Lone(fritz)\nforall x (Pricy(x) and Abortive(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nforall x (Abortive(x) -> not Pricy(x))\nPricy(neda) -> Uptight(neda)\n\nnot Abortive(claudio)\n\ntherefore Abortive(claudio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6463"} {"premises": "Bing is peanut. Bing is unimproved. Verla is bedrid. Verla is teetotal. Georgine is paneled. Hakim is changeless. Hakim is teetotal. Smart, changeless people are peanut. Smart, unimproved people are peanut. Rough people are unimproved. If Hakim is mithraic then Hakim is bedrid. If Bing is unimproved then Bing is bedrid. Blue, paneled people are changeless. Rough people are not mithraic. If Hakim is mithraic then Hakim is peanut. Verla is not unimproved.", "logic": "\nPeanut(bing)\nUnimproved(bing)\nBedrid(verla)\nTeetotal(verla)\nPaneled(georgine)\nChangeless(hakim)\nTeetotal(hakim)\nforall x (Teetotal(x) and Changeless(x) -> Peanut(x))\nforall x (Teetotal(x) and Unimproved(x) -> Peanut(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nMithraic(hakim) -> Bedrid(hakim)\nUnimproved(bing) -> Bedrid(bing)\nforall x (Mithraic(x) and Paneled(x) -> Changeless(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> not Mithraic(x))\nMithraic(hakim) -> Peanut(hakim)\n\nnot Unimproved(verla)\n\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Unimproved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6463"} {"premises": "Knox is unmoved. Knox is motionless. Eustacia is winding. Eustacia is phylliform. Winnie is unwonted. Minda is eristical. Minda is phylliform. Smart, eristical people are unmoved. Smart, motionless people are unmoved. Rough people are motionless. If Minda is such then Minda is winding. If Knox is motionless then Knox is winding. Blue, unwonted people are eristical. Rough people are not such. If Minda is such then Minda is unmoved. Winnie is phylliform.", "logic": "\nUnmoved(knox)\nMotionless(knox)\nWinding(eustacia)\nPhylliform(eustacia)\nUnwonted(winnie)\nEristical(minda)\nPhylliform(minda)\nforall x (Phylliform(x) and Eristical(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Phylliform(x) and Motionless(x) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Unwonted(x) -> Motionless(x))\nSuch(minda) -> Winding(minda)\nMotionless(knox) -> Winding(knox)\nforall x (Such(x) and Unwonted(x) -> Eristical(x))\nforall x (Unwonted(x) -> not Such(x))\nSuch(minda) -> Unmoved(minda)\n\nPhylliform(winnie)\n\nPhylliform(winnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6463"} {"premises": "Francyne is colloidal. Francyne is puckish. Francyne is unassuming. Francyne is unifying. Lorrayne is unassuming. Fawna is archaistic. Fawna is unassuming. Cold things are puckish. All unassuming things are yearly. All colloidal, unifying things are bisexual. If something is puckish and archaistic then it is colloidal. Blue things are unifying. All unassuming things are archaistic. If something is puckish and archaistic then it is unifying. If something is bisexual and unassuming then it is yearly. Francyne is puckish.", "logic": "\nColloidal(francyne)\nPuckish(francyne)\nUnassuming(francyne)\nUnifying(francyne)\nUnassuming(lorrayne)\nArchaistic(fawna)\nUnassuming(fawna)\nforall x (Archaistic(x) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Unassuming(x) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Colloidal(x) and Unifying(x) -> Bisexual(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Unifying(x))\nforall x (Unassuming(x) -> Archaistic(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Unifying(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) and Unassuming(x) -> Yearly(x))\n\nPuckish(francyne)\n\ntherefore Puckish(francyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Ward is praiseful. Ward is evaporable. Ward is important. Ward is neglectful. Andreana is important. Corabella is eyed. Corabella is important. Cold things are evaporable. All important things are vedic. All praiseful, neglectful things are baggy. If something is evaporable and eyed then it is praiseful. Blue things are neglectful. All important things are eyed. If something is evaporable and eyed then it is neglectful. If something is baggy and important then it is vedic. Ward is not evaporable.", "logic": "\nPraiseful(ward)\nEvaporable(ward)\nImportant(ward)\nNeglectful(ward)\nImportant(andreana)\nEyed(corabella)\nImportant(corabella)\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Evaporable(x))\nforall x (Important(x) -> Vedic(x))\nforall x (Praiseful(x) and Neglectful(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) and Eyed(x) -> Praiseful(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) -> Neglectful(x))\nforall x (Important(x) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) and Eyed(x) -> Neglectful(x))\nforall x (Baggy(x) and Important(x) -> Vedic(x))\n\nnot Evaporable(ward)\n\ntherefore Evaporable(ward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Taffy is implanted. Taffy is aquiline. Taffy is sluggish. Taffy is thrown. Fairfax is sluggish. Tybie is candid. Tybie is sluggish. Cold things are aquiline. All sluggish things are euphonic. All implanted, thrown things are slack. If something is aquiline and candid then it is implanted. Blue things are thrown. All sluggish things are candid. If something is aquiline and candid then it is thrown. If something is slack and sluggish then it is euphonic. Fairfax is candid.", "logic": "\nImplanted(taffy)\nAquiline(taffy)\nSluggish(taffy)\nThrown(taffy)\nSluggish(fairfax)\nCandid(tybie)\nSluggish(tybie)\nforall x (Candid(x) -> Aquiline(x))\nforall x (Sluggish(x) -> Euphonic(x))\nforall x (Implanted(x) and Thrown(x) -> Slack(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Candid(x) -> Implanted(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) -> Thrown(x))\nforall x (Sluggish(x) -> Candid(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Candid(x) -> Thrown(x))\nforall x (Slack(x) and Sluggish(x) -> Euphonic(x))\n\nCandid(fairfax)\n\nSluggish(fairfax) and forall x (Sluggish(x) -> Candid(x)) -> therefore Candid(fairfax)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Frederic is elapsed. Frederic is newsworthy. Frederic is evaluative. Frederic is smallish. Vanni is evaluative. Trixy is southmost. Trixy is evaluative. Cold things are newsworthy. All evaluative things are rheumy. All elapsed, smallish things are humbled. If something is newsworthy and southmost then it is elapsed. Blue things are smallish. All evaluative things are southmost. If something is newsworthy and southmost then it is smallish. If something is humbled and evaluative then it is rheumy. Frederic is not rheumy.", "logic": "\nElapsed(frederic)\nNewsworthy(frederic)\nEvaluative(frederic)\nSmallish(frederic)\nEvaluative(vanni)\nSouthmost(trixy)\nEvaluative(trixy)\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> Newsworthy(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) and Smallish(x) -> Humbled(x))\nforall x (Newsworthy(x) and Southmost(x) -> Elapsed(x))\nforall x (Newsworthy(x) -> Smallish(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Newsworthy(x) and Southmost(x) -> Smallish(x))\nforall x (Humbled(x) and Evaluative(x) -> Rheumy(x))\n\nnot Rheumy(frederic)\n\nEvaluative(frederic) and forall x (Evaluative(x) -> Rheumy(x)) -> therefore Rheumy(frederic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Alethea is stung. Alethea is radiating. Alethea is uncomplete. Alethea is correct. Ailey is uncomplete. Thacher is shut. Thacher is uncomplete. Cold things are radiating. All uncomplete things are tractable. All stung, correct things are silvery. If something is radiating and shut then it is stung. Blue things are correct. All uncomplete things are shut. If something is radiating and shut then it is correct. If something is silvery and uncomplete then it is tractable. Ailey is radiating.", "logic": "\nStung(alethea)\nRadiating(alethea)\nUncomplete(alethea)\nCorrect(alethea)\nUncomplete(ailey)\nShut(thacher)\nUncomplete(thacher)\nforall x (Shut(x) -> Radiating(x))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Tractable(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) and Correct(x) -> Silvery(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Shut(x) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) -> Correct(x))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Shut(x))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Shut(x) -> Correct(x))\nforall x (Silvery(x) and Uncomplete(x) -> Tractable(x))\n\nRadiating(ailey)\n\nUncomplete(ailey) and forall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Shut(x)) -> therefore Shut(ailey) Shut(ailey) and forall x (Shut(x) -> Radiating(x)) -> therefore Radiating(ailey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Korney is aquatic. Korney is generic. Korney is custom. Korney is licked. Normand is custom. Roth is bizarre. Roth is custom. Cold things are generic. All custom things are legal. All aquatic, licked things are shambolic. If something is generic and bizarre then it is aquatic. Blue things are licked. All custom things are bizarre. If something is generic and bizarre then it is licked. If something is shambolic and custom then it is legal. Roth is not licked.", "logic": "\nAquatic(korney)\nGeneric(korney)\nCustom(korney)\nLicked(korney)\nCustom(normand)\nBizarre(roth)\nCustom(roth)\nforall x (Bizarre(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Custom(x) -> Legal(x))\nforall x (Aquatic(x) and Licked(x) -> Shambolic(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Aquatic(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Licked(x))\nforall x (Custom(x) -> Bizarre(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Licked(x))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Custom(x) -> Legal(x))\n\nnot Licked(roth)\n\nBizarre(roth) and forall x (Bizarre(x) -> Generic(x)) -> therefore Generic(roth) Generic(roth) and forall x (Generic(x) -> Licked(x)) -> therefore Licked(roth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Penelope is hipped. Penelope is colossal. Penelope is solid. Penelope is eyelike. Maia is solid. Moshe is prenominal. Moshe is solid. Cold things are colossal. All solid things are retrorse. All hipped, eyelike things are wavelike. If something is colossal and prenominal then it is hipped. Blue things are eyelike. All solid things are prenominal. If something is colossal and prenominal then it is eyelike. If something is wavelike and solid then it is retrorse. Maia is hipped.", "logic": "\nHipped(penelope)\nColossal(penelope)\nSolid(penelope)\nEyelike(penelope)\nSolid(maia)\nPrenominal(moshe)\nSolid(moshe)\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Colossal(x))\nforall x (Solid(x) -> Retrorse(x))\nforall x (Hipped(x) and Eyelike(x) -> Wavelike(x))\nforall x (Colossal(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Hipped(x))\nforall x (Colossal(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Solid(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Colossal(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and Solid(x) -> Retrorse(x))\n\nHipped(maia)\n\nSolid(maia) and forall x (Solid(x) -> Prenominal(x)) -> therefore Prenominal(maia) Prenominal(maia) and forall x (Prenominal(x) -> Colossal(x)) -> therefore Colossal(maia) Solid(maia) and forall x (Solid(x) -> Prenominal(x)) -> therefore Prenominal(maia) Colossal(maia) and Prenominal(maia) and forall x (Colossal(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Hipped(x)) -> therefore Hipped(maia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Caldwell is reasonable. Caldwell is taurine. Caldwell is untoothed. Caldwell is tottering. Jaclyn is untoothed. Waylon is antitypic. Waylon is untoothed. Cold things are taurine. All untoothed things are caddish. All reasonable, tottering things are unread. If something is taurine and antitypic then it is reasonable. Blue things are tottering. All untoothed things are antitypic. If something is taurine and antitypic then it is tottering. If something is unread and untoothed then it is caddish. Jaclyn is not reasonable.", "logic": "\nReasonable(caldwell)\nTaurine(caldwell)\nUntoothed(caldwell)\nTottering(caldwell)\nUntoothed(jaclyn)\nAntitypic(waylon)\nUntoothed(waylon)\nforall x (Antitypic(x) -> Taurine(x))\nforall x (Untoothed(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Reasonable(x) and Tottering(x) -> Unread(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Reasonable(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Untoothed(x) -> Antitypic(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Untoothed(x) -> Caddish(x))\n\nnot Reasonable(jaclyn)\n\nUntoothed(jaclyn) and forall x (Untoothed(x) -> Antitypic(x)) -> therefore Antitypic(jaclyn) Antitypic(jaclyn) and forall x (Antitypic(x) -> Taurine(x)) -> therefore Taurine(jaclyn) Untoothed(jaclyn) and forall x (Untoothed(x) -> Antitypic(x)) -> therefore Antitypic(jaclyn) Taurine(jaclyn) and Antitypic(jaclyn) and forall x (Taurine(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Reasonable(x)) -> therefore Reasonable(jaclyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1742"} {"premises": "Loise is stilted. Loise is not unearthly. Loise is lilac. Loise is airborne. Loise is not hitlerian. Coretta is chadian. Coretta is hitlerian. If Loise is hitlerian and Loise is not chadian then Loise is contrabass. All stilted things are airborne. Green things are not airborne. If something is lilac and chadian then it is not unearthly. All chadian, stilted things are not unearthly. If something is airborne then it is lilac. If something is unearthly then it is lilac. If something is hitlerian and not airborne then it is lilac. Loise is lilac.", "logic": "\nStilted(loise)\nnot Unearthly(loise)\nLilac(loise)\nAirborne(loise)\nnot Hitlerian(loise)\nChadian(coretta)\nHitlerian(coretta)\nHitlerian(loise) and not Chadian(loise) -> Contrabass(loise)\nforall x (Stilted(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Chadian(x) -> not Airborne(x))\nforall x (Lilac(x) and Chadian(x) -> not Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Chadian(x) and Stilted(x) -> not Unearthly(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Hitlerian(x) and not Airborne(x) -> Lilac(x))\n\nLilac(loise)\n\ntherefore Lilac(loise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Kane is analgesic. Kane is not gilbertian. Kane is isotropic. Kane is tricolor. Kane is not brahminic. Meira is crosstown. Meira is brahminic. If Kane is brahminic and Kane is not crosstown then Kane is jocund. All analgesic things are tricolor. Green things are not tricolor. If something is isotropic and crosstown then it is not gilbertian. All crosstown, analgesic things are not gilbertian. If something is tricolor then it is isotropic. If something is gilbertian then it is isotropic. If something is brahminic and not tricolor then it is isotropic. Kane is not isotropic.", "logic": "\nAnalgesic(kane)\nnot Gilbertian(kane)\nIsotropic(kane)\nTricolor(kane)\nnot Brahminic(kane)\nCrosstown(meira)\nBrahminic(meira)\nBrahminic(kane) and not Crosstown(kane) -> Jocund(kane)\nforall x (Analgesic(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> not Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) and Crosstown(x) -> not Gilbertian(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) and Analgesic(x) -> not Gilbertian(x))\nforall x (Tricolor(x) -> Isotropic(x))\nforall x (Gilbertian(x) -> Isotropic(x))\nforall x (Brahminic(x) and not Tricolor(x) -> Isotropic(x))\n\nnot Isotropic(kane)\n\ntherefore Isotropic(kane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Babs is deducible. Babs is not medicinal. Babs is credible. Babs is deciding. Babs is not koranic. Rebeca is huffish. Rebeca is koranic. If Babs is koranic and Babs is not huffish then Babs is unwearying. All deducible things are deciding. Green things are not deciding. If something is credible and huffish then it is not medicinal. All huffish, deducible things are not medicinal. If something is deciding then it is credible. If something is medicinal then it is credible. If something is koranic and not deciding then it is credible. Rebeca is not deciding.", "logic": "\nDeducible(babs)\nnot Medicinal(babs)\nCredible(babs)\nDeciding(babs)\nnot Koranic(babs)\nHuffish(rebeca)\nKoranic(rebeca)\nKoranic(babs) and not Huffish(babs) -> Unwearying(babs)\nforall x (Deducible(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Huffish(x) -> not Deciding(x))\nforall x (Credible(x) and Huffish(x) -> not Medicinal(x))\nforall x (Huffish(x) and Deducible(x) -> not Medicinal(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Koranic(x) and not Deciding(x) -> Credible(x))\n\nnot Deciding(rebeca)\n\nHuffish(rebeca) and forall x (Huffish(x) -> not Deciding(x)) -> therefore not Deciding(rebeca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Adrian is unsmooth. Adrian is not gradable. Adrian is indexical. Adrian is sessile. Adrian is not unshoed. Kelcie is vacuolated. Kelcie is unshoed. If Adrian is unshoed and Adrian is not vacuolated then Adrian is sumptuous. All unsmooth things are sessile. Green things are not sessile. If something is indexical and vacuolated then it is not gradable. All vacuolated, unsmooth things are not gradable. If something is sessile then it is indexical. If something is gradable then it is indexical. If something is unshoed and not sessile then it is indexical. Kelcie is sessile.", "logic": "\nUnsmooth(adrian)\nnot Gradable(adrian)\nIndexical(adrian)\nSessile(adrian)\nnot Unshoed(adrian)\nVacuolated(kelcie)\nUnshoed(kelcie)\nUnshoed(adrian) and not Vacuolated(adrian) -> Sumptuous(adrian)\nforall x (Unsmooth(x) -> Sessile(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) -> not Sessile(x))\nforall x (Indexical(x) and Vacuolated(x) -> not Gradable(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) and Unsmooth(x) -> not Gradable(x))\nforall x (Sessile(x) -> Indexical(x))\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Indexical(x))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) and not Sessile(x) -> Indexical(x))\n\nSessile(kelcie)\n\nVacuolated(kelcie) and forall x (Vacuolated(x) -> not Sessile(x)) -> therefore not Sessile(kelcie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Alis is synoecious. Alis is not centric. Alis is pierced. Alis is agonising. Alis is not rarefied. Noni is distinct. Noni is rarefied. If Alis is rarefied and Alis is not distinct then Alis is taken. All synoecious things are agonising. Green things are not agonising. If something is pierced and distinct then it is not centric. All distinct, synoecious things are not centric. If something is agonising then it is pierced. If something is centric then it is pierced. If something is rarefied and not agonising then it is pierced. Noni is pierced.", "logic": "\nSynoecious(alis)\nnot Centric(alis)\nPierced(alis)\nAgonising(alis)\nnot Rarefied(alis)\nDistinct(noni)\nRarefied(noni)\nRarefied(alis) and not Distinct(alis) -> Taken(alis)\nforall x (Synoecious(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Distinct(x) -> not Agonising(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) and Distinct(x) -> not Centric(x))\nforall x (Distinct(x) and Synoecious(x) -> not Centric(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Centric(x) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Rarefied(x) and not Agonising(x) -> Pierced(x))\n\nPierced(noni)\n\nDistinct(noni) and forall x (Distinct(x) -> not Agonising(x)) -> therefore not Agonising(noni) Rarefied(noni) and not Agonising(noni) and forall x (Rarefied(x) and not Agonising(x) -> Pierced(x)) -> therefore Pierced(noni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Florie is felicitous. Florie is not glaucous. Florie is voluted. Florie is decadent. Florie is not played. Doralyn is invaluable. Doralyn is played. If Florie is played and Florie is not invaluable then Florie is foliaged. All felicitous things are decadent. Green things are not decadent. If something is voluted and invaluable then it is not glaucous. All invaluable, felicitous things are not glaucous. If something is decadent then it is voluted. If something is glaucous then it is voluted. If something is played and not decadent then it is voluted. Doralyn is not voluted.", "logic": "\nFelicitous(florie)\nnot Glaucous(florie)\nVoluted(florie)\nDecadent(florie)\nnot Played(florie)\nInvaluable(doralyn)\nPlayed(doralyn)\nPlayed(florie) and not Invaluable(florie) -> Foliaged(florie)\nforall x (Felicitous(x) -> Decadent(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> not Decadent(x))\nforall x (Voluted(x) and Invaluable(x) -> not Glaucous(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) and Felicitous(x) -> not Glaucous(x))\nforall x (Decadent(x) -> Voluted(x))\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Voluted(x))\nforall x (Played(x) and not Decadent(x) -> Voluted(x))\n\nnot Voluted(doralyn)\n\nInvaluable(doralyn) and forall x (Invaluable(x) -> not Decadent(x)) -> therefore not Decadent(doralyn) Played(doralyn) and not Decadent(doralyn) and forall x (Played(x) and not Decadent(x) -> Voluted(x)) -> therefore Voluted(doralyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Hermia is detonative. Hermia is not popeyed. Hermia is libidinous. Hermia is ritual. Hermia is not hoarse. Mitchael is aided. Mitchael is hoarse. If Hermia is hoarse and Hermia is not aided then Hermia is tamed. All detonative things are ritual. Green things are not ritual. If something is libidinous and aided then it is not popeyed. All aided, detonative things are not popeyed. If something is ritual then it is libidinous. If something is popeyed then it is libidinous. If something is hoarse and not ritual then it is libidinous. Mitchael is not popeyed.", "logic": "\nDetonative(hermia)\nnot Popeyed(hermia)\nLibidinous(hermia)\nRitual(hermia)\nnot Hoarse(hermia)\nAided(mitchael)\nHoarse(mitchael)\nHoarse(hermia) and not Aided(hermia) -> Tamed(hermia)\nforall x (Detonative(x) -> Ritual(x))\nforall x (Aided(x) -> not Ritual(x))\nforall x (Libidinous(x) and Aided(x) -> not Popeyed(x))\nforall x (Aided(x) and Detonative(x) -> not Popeyed(x))\nforall x (Ritual(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Hoarse(x) and not Ritual(x) -> Libidinous(x))\n\nnot Popeyed(mitchael)\n\nAided(mitchael) and forall x (Aided(x) -> not Ritual(x)) -> therefore not Ritual(mitchael) Hoarse(mitchael) and not Ritual(mitchael) and forall x (Hoarse(x) and not Ritual(x) -> Libidinous(x)) -> therefore Libidinous(mitchael) Libidinous(mitchael) and Aided(mitchael) and forall x (Libidinous(x) and Aided(x) -> not Popeyed(x)) -> therefore not Popeyed(mitchael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Ingemar is lurid. Ingemar is not thermal. Ingemar is plumed. Ingemar is honorary. Ingemar is not raising. Perle is linked. Perle is raising. If Ingemar is raising and Ingemar is not linked then Ingemar is feigned. All lurid things are honorary. Green things are not honorary. If something is plumed and linked then it is not thermal. All linked, lurid things are not thermal. If something is honorary then it is plumed. If something is thermal then it is plumed. If something is raising and not honorary then it is plumed. Perle is thermal.", "logic": "\nLurid(ingemar)\nnot Thermal(ingemar)\nPlumed(ingemar)\nHonorary(ingemar)\nnot Raising(ingemar)\nLinked(perle)\nRaising(perle)\nRaising(ingemar) and not Linked(ingemar) -> Feigned(ingemar)\nforall x (Lurid(x) -> Honorary(x))\nforall x (Linked(x) -> not Honorary(x))\nforall x (Plumed(x) and Linked(x) -> not Thermal(x))\nforall x (Linked(x) and Lurid(x) -> not Thermal(x))\nforall x (Honorary(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Thermal(x) -> Plumed(x))\nforall x (Raising(x) and not Honorary(x) -> Plumed(x))\n\nThermal(perle)\n\nLinked(perle) and forall x (Linked(x) -> not Honorary(x)) -> therefore not Honorary(perle) Raising(perle) and not Honorary(perle) and forall x (Raising(x) and not Honorary(x) -> Plumed(x)) -> therefore Plumed(perle) Plumed(perle) and Linked(perle) and forall x (Plumed(x) and Linked(x) -> not Thermal(x)) -> therefore not Thermal(perle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Trisha is impeccant. Trisha is not indigo. Trisha is fiduciary. Trisha is ironical. Trisha is not mitral. Vaughan is exodontic. Vaughan is mitral. If Trisha is mitral and Trisha is not exodontic then Trisha is seventieth. All impeccant things are ironical. Green things are not ironical. If something is fiduciary and exodontic then it is not indigo. All exodontic, impeccant things are not indigo. If something is ironical then it is fiduciary. If something is indigo then it is fiduciary. If something is mitral and not ironical then it is fiduciary. Trisha is not seventieth.", "logic": "\nImpeccant(trisha)\nnot Indigo(trisha)\nFiduciary(trisha)\nIronical(trisha)\nnot Mitral(trisha)\nExodontic(vaughan)\nMitral(vaughan)\nMitral(trisha) and not Exodontic(trisha) -> Seventieth(trisha)\nforall x (Impeccant(x) -> Ironical(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) -> not Ironical(x))\nforall x (Fiduciary(x) and Exodontic(x) -> not Indigo(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) and Impeccant(x) -> not Indigo(x))\nforall x (Ironical(x) -> Fiduciary(x))\nforall x (Indigo(x) -> Fiduciary(x))\nforall x (Mitral(x) and not Ironical(x) -> Fiduciary(x))\n\nnot Seventieth(trisha)\n\nMitral(trisha) and not Exodontic(trisha) -> Seventieth(trisha) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Hatty is shaven. Hatty is not unstilted. Hatty is afloat. Hatty is donnish. Hatty is not increasing. Avrit is anal. Avrit is increasing. If Hatty is increasing and Hatty is not anal then Hatty is ugly. All shaven things are donnish. Green things are not donnish. If something is afloat and anal then it is not unstilted. All anal, shaven things are not unstilted. If something is donnish then it is afloat. If something is unstilted then it is afloat. If something is increasing and not donnish then it is afloat. Hatty is anal.", "logic": "\nShaven(hatty)\nnot Unstilted(hatty)\nAfloat(hatty)\nDonnish(hatty)\nnot Increasing(hatty)\nAnal(avrit)\nIncreasing(avrit)\nIncreasing(hatty) and not Anal(hatty) -> Ugly(hatty)\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Donnish(x))\nforall x (Anal(x) -> not Donnish(x))\nforall x (Afloat(x) and Anal(x) -> not Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Anal(x) and Shaven(x) -> not Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Donnish(x) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Unstilted(x) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) and not Donnish(x) -> Afloat(x))\n\nAnal(hatty)\n\nAnal(hatty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Genevieve is grassy. Genevieve is not hipless. Genevieve is undisputed. Genevieve is timid. Genevieve is not ophthalmic. Travers is perfumed. Travers is ophthalmic. If Genevieve is ophthalmic and Genevieve is not perfumed then Genevieve is transitory. All grassy things are timid. Green things are not timid. If something is undisputed and perfumed then it is not hipless. All perfumed, grassy things are not hipless. If something is timid then it is undisputed. If something is hipless then it is undisputed. If something is ophthalmic and not timid then it is undisputed. Travers is not transitory.", "logic": "\nGrassy(genevieve)\nnot Hipless(genevieve)\nUndisputed(genevieve)\nTimid(genevieve)\nnot Ophthalmic(genevieve)\nPerfumed(travers)\nOphthalmic(travers)\nOphthalmic(genevieve) and not Perfumed(genevieve) -> Transitory(genevieve)\nforall x (Grassy(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> not Timid(x))\nforall x (Undisputed(x) and Perfumed(x) -> not Hipless(x))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) and Grassy(x) -> not Hipless(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Undisputed(x))\nforall x (Hipless(x) -> Undisputed(x))\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) and not Timid(x) -> Undisputed(x))\n\nnot Transitory(travers)\n\nnot Transitory(travers) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Tracy is champleve. Tracy is not antimonic. Tracy is upcurved. Tracy is unhappy. Tracy is not spendable. Jenn is seeded. Jenn is spendable. If Tracy is spendable and Tracy is not seeded then Tracy is rachitic. All champleve things are unhappy. Green things are not unhappy. If something is upcurved and seeded then it is not antimonic. All seeded, champleve things are not antimonic. If something is unhappy then it is upcurved. If something is antimonic then it is upcurved. If something is spendable and not unhappy then it is upcurved. Jenn is champleve.", "logic": "\nChampleve(tracy)\nnot Antimonic(tracy)\nUpcurved(tracy)\nUnhappy(tracy)\nnot Spendable(tracy)\nSeeded(jenn)\nSpendable(jenn)\nSpendable(tracy) and not Seeded(tracy) -> Rachitic(tracy)\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Unhappy(x))\nforall x (Seeded(x) -> not Unhappy(x))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Seeded(x) -> not Antimonic(x))\nforall x (Seeded(x) and Champleve(x) -> not Antimonic(x))\nforall x (Unhappy(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Antimonic(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) and not Unhappy(x) -> Upcurved(x))\n\nChampleve(jenn)\n\nChampleve(jenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "The joletta is costumed. If something is costumed then it is heatless. Cold, heatless things are jocund. All jocund, heatless things are monegasque. If the joletta is heatless and the joletta is monegasque then the joletta is jocund. All heatless things are costumed. All tubeless, heatless things are monegasque. All jocund things are heatless. Big, jocund things are monegasque. The joletta is costumed.", "logic": "\nCostumed(joletta)\nforall x (Costumed(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Heatless(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) and Heatless(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nHeatless(joletta) and Monegasque(joletta) -> Jocund(joletta)\nforall x (Heatless(x) -> Costumed(x))\nforall x (Tubeless(x) and Heatless(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Tubeless(x) and Jocund(x) -> Monegasque(x))\n\nCostumed(joletta)\n\ntherefore Costumed(joletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The mitra is carpetbag. If something is carpetbag then it is endocrine. Cold, endocrine things are slicked. All slicked, endocrine things are depleted. If the mitra is endocrine and the mitra is depleted then the mitra is slicked. All endocrine things are carpetbag. All palmlike, endocrine things are depleted. All slicked things are endocrine. Big, slicked things are depleted. The mitra is not carpetbag.", "logic": "\nCarpetbag(mitra)\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) and Endocrine(x) -> Slicked(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) and Endocrine(x) -> Depleted(x))\nEndocrine(mitra) and Depleted(mitra) -> Slicked(mitra)\nforall x (Endocrine(x) -> Carpetbag(x))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) and Endocrine(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) and Slicked(x) -> Depleted(x))\n\nnot Carpetbag(mitra)\n\ntherefore Carpetbag(mitra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The harv is maternal. If something is maternal then it is saharan. Cold, saharan things are effulgent. All effulgent, saharan things are susurrous. If the harv is saharan and the harv is susurrous then the harv is effulgent. All saharan things are maternal. All lite, saharan things are susurrous. All effulgent things are saharan. Big, effulgent things are susurrous. The harv is saharan.", "logic": "\nMaternal(harv)\nforall x (Maternal(x) -> Saharan(x))\nforall x (Maternal(x) and Saharan(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Effulgent(x) and Saharan(x) -> Susurrous(x))\nSaharan(harv) and Susurrous(harv) -> Effulgent(harv)\nforall x (Saharan(x) -> Maternal(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) and Saharan(x) -> Susurrous(x))\nforall x (Effulgent(x) -> Saharan(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) and Effulgent(x) -> Susurrous(x))\n\nSaharan(harv)\n\nMaternal(harv) and forall x (Maternal(x) -> Saharan(x)) -> therefore Saharan(harv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The lorenza is coplanar. If something is coplanar then it is clubable. Cold, clubable things are recherche. All recherche, clubable things are rotted. If the lorenza is clubable and the lorenza is rotted then the lorenza is recherche. All clubable things are coplanar. All actual, clubable things are rotted. All recherche things are clubable. Big, recherche things are rotted. The lorenza is not clubable.", "logic": "\nCoplanar(lorenza)\nforall x (Coplanar(x) -> Clubable(x))\nforall x (Coplanar(x) and Clubable(x) -> Recherche(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) and Clubable(x) -> Rotted(x))\nClubable(lorenza) and Rotted(lorenza) -> Recherche(lorenza)\nforall x (Clubable(x) -> Coplanar(x))\nforall x (Actual(x) and Clubable(x) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Clubable(x))\nforall x (Actual(x) and Recherche(x) -> Rotted(x))\n\nnot Clubable(lorenza)\n\nCoplanar(lorenza) and forall x (Coplanar(x) -> Clubable(x)) -> therefore Clubable(lorenza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The tome is adjusted. If something is adjusted then it is womanlike. Cold, womanlike things are aeronautic. All aeronautic, womanlike things are germfree. If the tome is womanlike and the tome is germfree then the tome is aeronautic. All womanlike things are adjusted. All unhurried, womanlike things are germfree. All aeronautic things are womanlike. Big, aeronautic things are germfree. The tome is aeronautic.", "logic": "\nAdjusted(tome)\nforall x (Adjusted(x) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Adjusted(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Aeronautic(x))\nforall x (Aeronautic(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Germfree(x))\nWomanlike(tome) and Germfree(tome) -> Aeronautic(tome)\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Adjusted(x))\nforall x (Unhurried(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Aeronautic(x) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Unhurried(x) and Aeronautic(x) -> Germfree(x))\n\nAeronautic(tome)\n\nAdjusted(tome) and forall x (Adjusted(x) -> Womanlike(x)) -> therefore Womanlike(tome) Adjusted(tome) and Womanlike(tome) and forall x (Adjusted(x) and Womanlike(x) -> Aeronautic(x)) -> therefore Aeronautic(tome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The florian is nonmetal. If something is nonmetal then it is dorsal. Cold, dorsal things are billowy. All billowy, dorsal things are uncurbed. If the florian is dorsal and the florian is uncurbed then the florian is billowy. All dorsal things are nonmetal. All sniffy, dorsal things are uncurbed. All billowy things are dorsal. Big, billowy things are uncurbed. The florian is not billowy.", "logic": "\nNonmetal(florian)\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Dorsal(x))\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) and Dorsal(x) -> Billowy(x))\nforall x (Billowy(x) and Dorsal(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nDorsal(florian) and Uncurbed(florian) -> Billowy(florian)\nforall x (Dorsal(x) -> Nonmetal(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) and Dorsal(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nforall x (Billowy(x) -> Dorsal(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) and Billowy(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\n\nnot Billowy(florian)\n\nNonmetal(florian) and forall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Dorsal(x)) -> therefore Dorsal(florian) Nonmetal(florian) and Dorsal(florian) and forall x (Nonmetal(x) and Dorsal(x) -> Billowy(x)) -> therefore Billowy(florian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The joete is recherche. If something is recherche then it is wretched. Cold, wretched things are unjust. All unjust, wretched things are epicurean. If the joete is wretched and the joete is epicurean then the joete is unjust. All wretched things are recherche. All icelandic, wretched things are epicurean. All unjust things are wretched. Big, unjust things are epicurean. The joete is epicurean.", "logic": "\nRecherche(joete)\nforall x (Recherche(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Recherche(x) and Wretched(x) -> Unjust(x))\nforall x (Unjust(x) and Wretched(x) -> Epicurean(x))\nWretched(joete) and Epicurean(joete) -> Unjust(joete)\nforall x (Wretched(x) -> Recherche(x))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) and Wretched(x) -> Epicurean(x))\nforall x (Unjust(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) and Unjust(x) -> Epicurean(x))\n\nEpicurean(joete)\n\nRecherche(joete) and forall x (Recherche(x) -> Wretched(x)) -> therefore Wretched(joete) Recherche(joete) and Wretched(joete) and forall x (Recherche(x) and Wretched(x) -> Unjust(x)) -> therefore Unjust(joete) Recherche(joete) and forall x (Recherche(x) -> Wretched(x)) -> therefore Wretched(joete) Unjust(joete) and Wretched(joete) and forall x (Unjust(x) and Wretched(x) -> Epicurean(x)) -> therefore Epicurean(joete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The leelah is drizzling. If something is drizzling then it is twinkly. Cold, twinkly things are color. All color, twinkly things are forty. If the leelah is twinkly and the leelah is forty then the leelah is color. All twinkly things are drizzling. All mutinous, twinkly things are forty. All color things are twinkly. Big, color things are forty. The leelah is not forty.", "logic": "\nDrizzling(leelah)\nforall x (Drizzling(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nforall x (Drizzling(x) and Twinkly(x) -> Color(x))\nforall x (Color(x) and Twinkly(x) -> Forty(x))\nTwinkly(leelah) and Forty(leelah) -> Color(leelah)\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Drizzling(x))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Twinkly(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Color(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Color(x) -> Forty(x))\n\nnot Forty(leelah)\n\nDrizzling(leelah) and forall x (Drizzling(x) -> Twinkly(x)) -> therefore Twinkly(leelah) Drizzling(leelah) and Twinkly(leelah) and forall x (Drizzling(x) and Twinkly(x) -> Color(x)) -> therefore Color(leelah) Drizzling(leelah) and forall x (Drizzling(x) -> Twinkly(x)) -> therefore Twinkly(leelah) Color(leelah) and Twinkly(leelah) and forall x (Color(x) and Twinkly(x) -> Forty(x)) -> therefore Forty(leelah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The gerry is homostyled. If something is homostyled then it is ersatz. Cold, ersatz things are maintained. All maintained, ersatz things are handleless. If the gerry is ersatz and the gerry is handleless then the gerry is maintained. All ersatz things are homostyled. All real, ersatz things are handleless. All maintained things are ersatz. Big, maintained things are handleless. The gerry does not chase the gerry.", "logic": "\nHomostyled(gerry)\nforall x (Homostyled(x) -> Ersatz(x))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Ersatz(x) -> Maintained(x))\nforall x (Maintained(x) and Ersatz(x) -> Handleless(x))\nErsatz(gerry) and Handleless(gerry) -> Maintained(gerry)\nforall x (Ersatz(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nforall x (Real(x) and Ersatz(x) -> Handleless(x))\nforall x (Maintained(x) -> Ersatz(x))\nforall x (Real(x) and Maintained(x) -> Handleless(x))\n\nnot Chases(gerry, gerry)\n\nnot Chases(gerry, gerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The adena is assorted. If something is assorted then it is reprobate. Cold, reprobate things are ambivalent. All ambivalent, reprobate things are uncaulked. If the adena is reprobate and the adena is uncaulked then the adena is ambivalent. All reprobate things are assorted. All unoiled, reprobate things are uncaulked. All ambivalent things are reprobate. Big, ambivalent things are uncaulked. The adena needs the adena.", "logic": "\nAssorted(adena)\nforall x (Assorted(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Assorted(x) and Reprobate(x) -> Ambivalent(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) and Reprobate(x) -> Uncaulked(x))\nReprobate(adena) and Uncaulked(adena) -> Ambivalent(adena)\nforall x (Reprobate(x) -> Assorted(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) and Reprobate(x) -> Uncaulked(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) and Ambivalent(x) -> Uncaulked(x))\n\nNeeds(adena, adena)\n\nNeeds(adena, adena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The clair is scorned. If something is scorned then it is flowered. Cold, flowered things are free. All free, flowered things are rockbound. If the clair is flowered and the clair is rockbound then the clair is free. All flowered things are scorned. All snarly, flowered things are rockbound. All free things are flowered. Big, free things are rockbound. The clair does not visit the clair.", "logic": "\nScorned(clair)\nforall x (Scorned(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Scorned(x) and Flowered(x) -> Free(x))\nforall x (Free(x) and Flowered(x) -> Rockbound(x))\nFlowered(clair) and Rockbound(clair) -> Free(clair)\nforall x (Flowered(x) -> Scorned(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) and Flowered(x) -> Rockbound(x))\nforall x (Free(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) and Free(x) -> Rockbound(x))\n\nnot Visits(clair, clair)\n\nnot Visits(clair, clair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "The prunella is bereaved. If something is bereaved then it is cultivated. Cold, cultivated things are aboriginal. All aboriginal, cultivated things are sore. If the prunella is cultivated and the prunella is sore then the prunella is aboriginal. All cultivated things are bereaved. All inaudible, cultivated things are sore. All aboriginal things are cultivated. Big, aboriginal things are sore. The prunella is inaudible.", "logic": "\nBereaved(prunella)\nforall x (Bereaved(x) -> Cultivated(x))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Aboriginal(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Sore(x))\nCultivated(prunella) and Sore(prunella) -> Aboriginal(prunella)\nforall x (Cultivated(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Inaudible(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Sore(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) -> Cultivated(x))\nforall x (Inaudible(x) and Aboriginal(x) -> Sore(x))\n\nInaudible(prunella)\n\nInaudible(prunella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-606"} {"premises": "Fey is upland. Fey is suave. Fey is semidark. Garnet is upland. Garnet is not suave. Annalisa is not upland. Annalisa is oviform. Annalisa is branching. Annalisa is semidark. Eirena is bicorned. Young, oviform things are semidark. If something is oviform then it is pinkish. If something is upland then it is pinkish. Green things are upland. Blue things are oviform. If Annalisa is semidark then Annalisa is pinkish. All upland things are branching. If something is upland and not oviform then it is branching. Garnet is upland.", "logic": "\nUpland(fey)\nSuave(fey)\nSemidark(fey)\nUpland(garnet)\nnot Suave(garnet)\nnot Upland(annalisa)\nOviform(annalisa)\nBranching(annalisa)\nSemidark(annalisa)\nBicorned(eirena)\nforall x (Pinkish(x) and Oviform(x) -> Semidark(x))\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Pinkish(x))\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Pinkish(x))\nforall x (Bicorned(x) -> Upland(x))\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Oviform(x))\nSemidark(annalisa) -> Pinkish(annalisa)\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Branching(x))\nforall x (Upland(x) and not Oviform(x) -> Branching(x))\n\nUpland(garnet)\n\ntherefore Upland(garnet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Kelcey is overgreedy. Kelcey is intramural. Kelcey is discalced. Tabbitha is overgreedy. Tabbitha is not intramural. Zora is not overgreedy. Zora is skim. Zora is titled. Zora is discalced. Elyssa is versed. Young, skim things are discalced. If something is skim then it is woodsy. If something is overgreedy then it is woodsy. Green things are overgreedy. Blue things are skim. If Zora is discalced then Zora is woodsy. All overgreedy things are titled. If something is overgreedy and not skim then it is titled. Zora is not skim.", "logic": "\nOvergreedy(kelcey)\nIntramural(kelcey)\nDiscalced(kelcey)\nOvergreedy(tabbitha)\nnot Intramural(tabbitha)\nnot Overgreedy(zora)\nSkim(zora)\nTitled(zora)\nDiscalced(zora)\nVersed(elyssa)\nforall x (Woodsy(x) and Skim(x) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Skim(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Versed(x) -> Overgreedy(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Skim(x))\nDiscalced(zora) -> Woodsy(zora)\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Titled(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) and not Skim(x) -> Titled(x))\n\nnot Skim(zora)\n\ntherefore Skim(zora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Adina is encrusted. Adina is lxxxvi. Adina is boughten. Faye is encrusted. Faye is not lxxxvi. Astrid is not encrusted. Astrid is undue. Astrid is overladen. Astrid is boughten. Barri is slipping. Young, undue things are boughten. If something is undue then it is vitreous. If something is encrusted then it is vitreous. Green things are encrusted. Blue things are undue. If Astrid is boughten then Astrid is vitreous. All encrusted things are overladen. If something is encrusted and not undue then it is overladen. Astrid is vitreous.", "logic": "\nEncrusted(adina)\nLxxxvi(adina)\nBoughten(adina)\nEncrusted(faye)\nnot Lxxxvi(faye)\nnot Encrusted(astrid)\nUndue(astrid)\nOverladen(astrid)\nBoughten(astrid)\nSlipping(barri)\nforall x (Vitreous(x) and Undue(x) -> Boughten(x))\nforall x (Undue(x) -> Vitreous(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> Vitreous(x))\nforall x (Slipping(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> Undue(x))\nBoughten(astrid) -> Vitreous(astrid)\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and not Undue(x) -> Overladen(x))\n\nVitreous(astrid)\n\nUndue(astrid) and forall x (Undue(x) -> Vitreous(x)) -> therefore Vitreous(astrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Devin is unannealed. Devin is advised. Devin is hulky. Adelle is unannealed. Adelle is not advised. Neille is not unannealed. Neille is prolusory. Neille is uveal. Neille is hulky. Ardeen is idle. Young, prolusory things are hulky. If something is prolusory then it is opaline. If something is unannealed then it is opaline. Green things are unannealed. Blue things are prolusory. If Neille is hulky then Neille is opaline. All unannealed things are uveal. If something is unannealed and not prolusory then it is uveal. Devin is not prolusory.", "logic": "\nUnannealed(devin)\nAdvised(devin)\nHulky(devin)\nUnannealed(adelle)\nnot Advised(adelle)\nnot Unannealed(neille)\nProlusory(neille)\nUveal(neille)\nHulky(neille)\nIdle(ardeen)\nforall x (Opaline(x) and Prolusory(x) -> Hulky(x))\nforall x (Prolusory(x) -> Opaline(x))\nforall x (Unannealed(x) -> Opaline(x))\nforall x (Idle(x) -> Unannealed(x))\nforall x (Unannealed(x) -> Prolusory(x))\nHulky(neille) -> Opaline(neille)\nforall x (Unannealed(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Unannealed(x) and not Prolusory(x) -> Uveal(x))\n\nnot Prolusory(devin)\n\nUnannealed(devin) and forall x (Unannealed(x) -> Prolusory(x)) -> therefore Prolusory(devin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Arther is thronged. Arther is undercover. Arther is concerned. Idette is thronged. Idette is not undercover. Kaari is not thronged. Kaari is startled. Kaari is mutational. Kaari is concerned. Margarete is treacly. Young, startled things are concerned. If something is startled then it is knotted. If something is thronged then it is knotted. Green things are thronged. Blue things are startled. If Kaari is concerned then Kaari is knotted. All thronged things are mutational. If something is thronged and not startled then it is mutational. Idette is concerned.", "logic": "\nThronged(arther)\nUndercover(arther)\nConcerned(arther)\nThronged(idette)\nnot Undercover(idette)\nnot Thronged(kaari)\nStartled(kaari)\nMutational(kaari)\nConcerned(kaari)\nTreacly(margarete)\nforall x (Knotted(x) and Startled(x) -> Concerned(x))\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Treacly(x) -> Thronged(x))\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Startled(x))\nConcerned(kaari) -> Knotted(kaari)\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Mutational(x))\nforall x (Thronged(x) and not Startled(x) -> Mutational(x))\n\nConcerned(idette)\n\nThronged(idette) and forall x (Thronged(x) -> Knotted(x)) -> therefore Knotted(idette) Thronged(idette) and forall x (Thronged(x) -> Startled(x)) -> therefore Startled(idette) Knotted(idette) and Startled(idette) and forall x (Knotted(x) and Startled(x) -> Concerned(x)) -> therefore Concerned(idette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Collins is aestival. Collins is delusional. Collins is punk. Esma is aestival. Esma is not delusional. Lindy is not aestival. Lindy is unplowed. Lindy is cherty. Lindy is punk. Mora is tamil. Young, unplowed things are punk. If something is unplowed then it is quenchless. If something is aestival then it is quenchless. Green things are aestival. Blue things are unplowed. If Lindy is punk then Lindy is quenchless. All aestival things are cherty. If something is aestival and not unplowed then it is cherty. Mora is not quenchless.", "logic": "\nAestival(collins)\nDelusional(collins)\nPunk(collins)\nAestival(esma)\nnot Delusional(esma)\nnot Aestival(lindy)\nUnplowed(lindy)\nCherty(lindy)\nPunk(lindy)\nTamil(mora)\nforall x (Quenchless(x) and Unplowed(x) -> Punk(x))\nforall x (Unplowed(x) -> Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Tamil(x) -> Aestival(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Unplowed(x))\nPunk(lindy) -> Quenchless(lindy)\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Cherty(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) and not Unplowed(x) -> Cherty(x))\n\nnot Quenchless(mora)\n\nTamil(mora) and forall x (Tamil(x) -> Aestival(x)) -> therefore Aestival(mora) Aestival(mora) and forall x (Aestival(x) -> Quenchless(x)) -> therefore Quenchless(mora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Stepha is senatorial. Stepha is desirable. Stepha is basilary. Tansy is senatorial. Tansy is not desirable. Gwennie is not senatorial. Gwennie is lowermost. Gwennie is mixable. Gwennie is basilary. Ileana is multiphase. Young, lowermost things are basilary. If something is lowermost then it is impeccable. If something is senatorial then it is impeccable. Green things are senatorial. Blue things are lowermost. If Gwennie is basilary then Gwennie is impeccable. All senatorial things are mixable. If something is senatorial and not lowermost then it is mixable. Ileana is basilary.", "logic": "\nSenatorial(stepha)\nDesirable(stepha)\nBasilary(stepha)\nSenatorial(tansy)\nnot Desirable(tansy)\nnot Senatorial(gwennie)\nLowermost(gwennie)\nMixable(gwennie)\nBasilary(gwennie)\nMultiphase(ileana)\nforall x (Impeccable(x) and Lowermost(x) -> Basilary(x))\nforall x (Lowermost(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Senatorial(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Multiphase(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Senatorial(x) -> Lowermost(x))\nBasilary(gwennie) -> Impeccable(gwennie)\nforall x (Senatorial(x) -> Mixable(x))\nforall x (Senatorial(x) and not Lowermost(x) -> Mixable(x))\n\nBasilary(ileana)\n\nMultiphase(ileana) and forall x (Multiphase(x) -> Senatorial(x)) -> therefore Senatorial(ileana) Senatorial(ileana) and forall x (Senatorial(x) -> Impeccable(x)) -> therefore Impeccable(ileana) Multiphase(ileana) and forall x (Multiphase(x) -> Senatorial(x)) -> therefore Senatorial(ileana) Senatorial(ileana) and forall x (Senatorial(x) -> Lowermost(x)) -> therefore Lowermost(ileana) Impeccable(ileana) and Lowermost(ileana) and forall x (Impeccable(x) and Lowermost(x) -> Basilary(x)) -> therefore Basilary(ileana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Wilmar is risible. Wilmar is attenuate. Wilmar is treelike. Gabriel is risible. Gabriel is not attenuate. Anita is not risible. Anita is jingoistic. Anita is episodic. Anita is treelike. Ramona is upper. Young, jingoistic things are treelike. If something is jingoistic then it is rubbishy. If something is risible then it is rubbishy. Green things are risible. Blue things are jingoistic. If Anita is treelike then Anita is rubbishy. All risible things are episodic. If something is risible and not jingoistic then it is episodic. Ramona is not treelike.", "logic": "\nRisible(wilmar)\nAttenuate(wilmar)\nTreelike(wilmar)\nRisible(gabriel)\nnot Attenuate(gabriel)\nnot Risible(anita)\nJingoistic(anita)\nEpisodic(anita)\nTreelike(anita)\nUpper(ramona)\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) and Jingoistic(x) -> Treelike(x))\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\nforall x (Risible(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Risible(x))\nforall x (Risible(x) -> Jingoistic(x))\nTreelike(anita) -> Rubbishy(anita)\nforall x (Risible(x) -> Episodic(x))\nforall x (Risible(x) and not Jingoistic(x) -> Episodic(x))\n\nnot Treelike(ramona)\n\nUpper(ramona) and forall x (Upper(x) -> Risible(x)) -> therefore Risible(ramona) Risible(ramona) and forall x (Risible(x) -> Rubbishy(x)) -> therefore Rubbishy(ramona) Upper(ramona) and forall x (Upper(x) -> Risible(x)) -> therefore Risible(ramona) Risible(ramona) and forall x (Risible(x) -> Jingoistic(x)) -> therefore Jingoistic(ramona) Rubbishy(ramona) and Jingoistic(ramona) and forall x (Rubbishy(x) and Jingoistic(x) -> Treelike(x)) -> therefore Treelike(ramona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Myranda is spattered. Myranda is inharmonic. Myranda is dianoetic. Norry is spattered. Norry is not inharmonic. Gene is not spattered. Gene is etiologic. Gene is genealogic. Gene is dianoetic. Shorty is lethargic. Young, etiologic things are dianoetic. If something is etiologic then it is gluteal. If something is spattered then it is gluteal. Green things are spattered. Blue things are etiologic. If Gene is dianoetic then Gene is gluteal. All spattered things are genealogic. If something is spattered and not etiologic then it is genealogic. Norry is not lethargic.", "logic": "\nSpattered(myranda)\nInharmonic(myranda)\nDianoetic(myranda)\nSpattered(norry)\nnot Inharmonic(norry)\nnot Spattered(gene)\nEtiologic(gene)\nGenealogic(gene)\nDianoetic(gene)\nLethargic(shorty)\nforall x (Gluteal(x) and Etiologic(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Etiologic(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Spattered(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) -> Etiologic(x))\nDianoetic(gene) -> Gluteal(gene)\nforall x (Spattered(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) and not Etiologic(x) -> Genealogic(x))\n\nnot Lethargic(norry)\n\nnot Lethargic(norry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Dirk is nuts. Dirk is apraxic. Dirk is bearded. Albina is nuts. Albina is not apraxic. Jordon is not nuts. Jordon is budding. Jordon is touched. Jordon is bearded. Aurora is streaky. Young, budding things are bearded. If something is budding then it is calico. If something is nuts then it is calico. Green things are nuts. Blue things are budding. If Jordon is bearded then Jordon is calico. All nuts things are touched. If something is nuts and not budding then it is touched. Jordon is streaky.", "logic": "\nNuts(dirk)\nApraxic(dirk)\nBearded(dirk)\nNuts(albina)\nnot Apraxic(albina)\nnot Nuts(jordon)\nBudding(jordon)\nTouched(jordon)\nBearded(jordon)\nStreaky(aurora)\nforall x (Calico(x) and Budding(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Budding(x) -> Calico(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Calico(x))\nforall x (Streaky(x) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Budding(x))\nBearded(jordon) -> Calico(jordon)\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Touched(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) and not Budding(x) -> Touched(x))\n\nStreaky(jordon)\n\nStreaky(jordon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Celina is commanding. Celina is chatty. Celina is praiseful. Yvette is commanding. Yvette is not chatty. Gianna is not commanding. Gianna is corrective. Gianna is choral. Gianna is praiseful. Noreen is tenderised. Young, corrective things are praiseful. If something is corrective then it is covariant. If something is commanding then it is covariant. Green things are commanding. Blue things are corrective. If Gianna is praiseful then Gianna is covariant. All commanding things are choral. If something is commanding and not corrective then it is choral. Noreen is not chatty.", "logic": "\nCommanding(celina)\nChatty(celina)\nPraiseful(celina)\nCommanding(yvette)\nnot Chatty(yvette)\nnot Commanding(gianna)\nCorrective(gianna)\nChoral(gianna)\nPraiseful(gianna)\nTenderised(noreen)\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Corrective(x) -> Praiseful(x))\nforall x (Corrective(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Commanding(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Tenderised(x) -> Commanding(x))\nforall x (Commanding(x) -> Corrective(x))\nPraiseful(gianna) -> Covariant(gianna)\nforall x (Commanding(x) -> Choral(x))\nforall x (Commanding(x) and not Corrective(x) -> Choral(x))\n\nnot Chatty(noreen)\n\nnot Chatty(noreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "Radcliffe is rhodesian. Radcliffe is banging. Radcliffe is needless. Gustave is rhodesian. Gustave is not banging. Antoine is not rhodesian. Antoine is intolerant. Antoine is slipping. Antoine is needless. Don is unforceful. Young, intolerant things are needless. If something is intolerant then it is hooked. If something is rhodesian then it is hooked. Green things are rhodesian. Blue things are intolerant. If Antoine is needless then Antoine is hooked. All rhodesian things are slipping. If something is rhodesian and not intolerant then it is slipping. Radcliffe is unforceful.", "logic": "\nRhodesian(radcliffe)\nBanging(radcliffe)\nNeedless(radcliffe)\nRhodesian(gustave)\nnot Banging(gustave)\nnot Rhodesian(antoine)\nIntolerant(antoine)\nSlipping(antoine)\nNeedless(antoine)\nUnforceful(don)\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Intolerant(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Unforceful(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) -> Intolerant(x))\nNeedless(antoine) -> Hooked(antoine)\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) and not Intolerant(x) -> Slipping(x))\n\nUnforceful(radcliffe)\n\nUnforceful(radcliffe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1590"} {"premises": "The teador sightsing the marlow. The jeannette strive the jolee. The marlow is merged. The jolee strive the marlow. If something strive the marlow then it is traceable. If something strive the jolee and the jolee chisel the marlow then it is traceable. If something strive the jeannette then it strive the marlow. If something is merged then it sightsing the jeannette. If something sightsing the marlow then it strive the jeannette. If something sightsing the marlow then the marlow is traceable. If something sightsing the jolee then the jolee is homozygous. If something sightsing the teador then it chisel the marlow. The jolee strive the marlow.", "logic": "\nSightsing(teador, marlow)\nStrive(jeannette, jolee)\nMerged(marlow)\nStrive(jolee, marlow)\nforall x (Strive(x, marlow) -> Traceable(x))\nforall x (Strive(x, jolee) and Chisel(jolee, marlow) -> Traceable(x))\nforall x (Strive(x, jeannette) -> Strive(x, marlow))\nforall x (Merged(x) -> Sightsing(x, jeannette))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, marlow) -> Strive(x, jeannette))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, marlow) -> Traceable(marlow))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, jolee) -> Homozygous(jolee))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, teador) -> Chisel(x, marlow))\n\nStrive(jolee, marlow)\n\ntherefore Strive(jolee, marlow)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The adara count the margette. The prescott reave the kimbra. The margette is astragalar. The kimbra reave the margette. If something reave the margette then it is quotable. If something reave the kimbra and the kimbra candy the margette then it is quotable. If something reave the prescott then it reave the margette. If something is astragalar then it count the prescott. If something count the margette then it reave the prescott. If something count the margette then the margette is quotable. If something count the kimbra then the kimbra is crinkled. If something count the adara then it candy the margette. The kimbra does not like the margette.", "logic": "\nCount(adara, margette)\nReave(prescott, kimbra)\nAstragalar(margette)\nReave(kimbra, margette)\nforall x (Reave(x, margette) -> Quotable(x))\nforall x (Reave(x, kimbra) and Candy(kimbra, margette) -> Quotable(x))\nforall x (Reave(x, prescott) -> Reave(x, margette))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> Count(x, prescott))\nforall x (Count(x, margette) -> Reave(x, prescott))\nforall x (Count(x, margette) -> Quotable(margette))\nforall x (Count(x, kimbra) -> Crinkled(kimbra))\nforall x (Count(x, adara) -> Candy(x, margette))\n\nnot Reave(kimbra, margette)\n\ntherefore Reave(kimbra, margette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The revkah bollocks the ward. The laure fresco the noell. The ward is untold. The noell fresco the ward. If something fresco the ward then it is hortative. If something fresco the noell and the noell decussate the ward then it is hortative. If something fresco the laure then it fresco the ward. If something is untold then it bollocks the laure. If something bollocks the ward then it fresco the laure. If something bollocks the ward then the ward is hortative. If something bollocks the noell then the noell is lysogenic. If something bollocks the revkah then it decussate the ward. The revkah fresco the laure.", "logic": "\nBollocks(revkah, ward)\nFresco(laure, noell)\nUntold(ward)\nFresco(noell, ward)\nforall x (Fresco(x, ward) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Fresco(x, noell) and Decussate(noell, ward) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Fresco(x, laure) -> Fresco(x, ward))\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Bollocks(x, laure))\nforall x (Bollocks(x, ward) -> Fresco(x, laure))\nforall x (Bollocks(x, ward) -> Hortative(ward))\nforall x (Bollocks(x, noell) -> Lysogenic(noell))\nforall x (Bollocks(x, revkah) -> Decussate(x, ward))\n\nFresco(revkah, laure)\n\nBollocks(revkah, ward) and forall x (Bollocks(x, ward) -> Fresco(x, laure)) -> therefore Fresco(revkah, laure)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The jocelyne bask the ruperta. The candice season the liuka. The ruperta is allopathic. The liuka season the ruperta. If something season the ruperta then it is spinous. If something season the liuka and the liuka point the ruperta then it is spinous. If something season the candice then it season the ruperta. If something is allopathic then it bask the candice. If something bask the ruperta then it season the candice. If something bask the ruperta then the ruperta is spinous. If something bask the liuka then the liuka is unfriendly. If something bask the jocelyne then it point the ruperta. The liuka is not spinous.", "logic": "\nBask(jocelyne, ruperta)\nSeason(candice, liuka)\nAllopathic(ruperta)\nSeason(liuka, ruperta)\nforall x (Season(x, ruperta) -> Spinous(x))\nforall x (Season(x, liuka) and Point(liuka, ruperta) -> Spinous(x))\nforall x (Season(x, candice) -> Season(x, ruperta))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Bask(x, candice))\nforall x (Bask(x, ruperta) -> Season(x, candice))\nforall x (Bask(x, ruperta) -> Spinous(ruperta))\nforall x (Bask(x, liuka) -> Unfriendly(liuka))\nforall x (Bask(x, jocelyne) -> Point(x, ruperta))\n\nnot Spinous(liuka)\n\nSeason(liuka, ruperta) and forall x (Season(x, ruperta) -> Spinous(x)) -> therefore Spinous(liuka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The perla protest the josee. The wayne reevaluate the riki. The josee is preemptive. The riki reevaluate the josee. If something reevaluate the josee then it is insulting. If something reevaluate the riki and the riki italicize the josee then it is insulting. If something reevaluate the wayne then it reevaluate the josee. If something is preemptive then it protest the wayne. If something protest the josee then it reevaluate the wayne. If something protest the josee then the josee is insulting. If something protest the riki then the riki is sanious. If something protest the perla then it italicize the josee. The perla reevaluate the josee.", "logic": "\nProtest(perla, josee)\nReevaluate(wayne, riki)\nPreemptive(josee)\nReevaluate(riki, josee)\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, josee) -> Insulting(x))\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, riki) and Italicize(riki, josee) -> Insulting(x))\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, wayne) -> Reevaluate(x, josee))\nforall x (Preemptive(x) -> Protest(x, wayne))\nforall x (Protest(x, josee) -> Reevaluate(x, wayne))\nforall x (Protest(x, josee) -> Insulting(josee))\nforall x (Protest(x, riki) -> Sanious(riki))\nforall x (Protest(x, perla) -> Italicize(x, josee))\n\nReevaluate(perla, josee)\n\nProtest(perla, josee) and forall x (Protest(x, josee) -> Reevaluate(x, wayne)) -> therefore Reevaluate(perla, wayne) Reevaluate(perla, wayne) and forall x (Reevaluate(x, wayne) -> Reevaluate(x, josee)) -> therefore Reevaluate(perla, josee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The valaree bracket the sloan. The efram clunk the wynton. The sloan is xxiii. The wynton clunk the sloan. If something clunk the sloan then it is viscid. If something clunk the wynton and the wynton disown the sloan then it is viscid. If something clunk the efram then it clunk the sloan. If something is xxiii then it bracket the efram. If something bracket the sloan then it clunk the efram. If something bracket the sloan then the sloan is viscid. If something bracket the wynton then the wynton is antipodal. If something bracket the valaree then it disown the sloan. The valaree does not like the sloan.", "logic": "\nBracket(valaree, sloan)\nClunk(efram, wynton)\nXxiii(sloan)\nClunk(wynton, sloan)\nforall x (Clunk(x, sloan) -> Viscid(x))\nforall x (Clunk(x, wynton) and Disown(wynton, sloan) -> Viscid(x))\nforall x (Clunk(x, efram) -> Clunk(x, sloan))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) -> Bracket(x, efram))\nforall x (Bracket(x, sloan) -> Clunk(x, efram))\nforall x (Bracket(x, sloan) -> Viscid(sloan))\nforall x (Bracket(x, wynton) -> Antipodal(wynton))\nforall x (Bracket(x, valaree) -> Disown(x, sloan))\n\nnot Clunk(valaree, sloan)\n\nBracket(valaree, sloan) and forall x (Bracket(x, sloan) -> Clunk(x, efram)) -> therefore Clunk(valaree, efram) Clunk(valaree, efram) and forall x (Clunk(x, efram) -> Clunk(x, sloan)) -> therefore Clunk(valaree, sloan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The janaye trim the annabell. The agnella hinder the linnie. The annabell is meridian. The linnie hinder the annabell. If something hinder the annabell then it is alluring. If something hinder the linnie and the linnie chariot the annabell then it is alluring. If something hinder the agnella then it hinder the annabell. If something is meridian then it trim the agnella. If something trim the annabell then it hinder the agnella. If something trim the annabell then the annabell is alluring. If something trim the linnie then the linnie is hugoesque. If something trim the janaye then it chariot the annabell. The janaye is alluring.", "logic": "\nTrim(janaye, annabell)\nHinder(agnella, linnie)\nMeridian(annabell)\nHinder(linnie, annabell)\nforall x (Hinder(x, annabell) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Hinder(x, linnie) and Chariot(linnie, annabell) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Hinder(x, agnella) -> Hinder(x, annabell))\nforall x (Meridian(x) -> Trim(x, agnella))\nforall x (Trim(x, annabell) -> Hinder(x, agnella))\nforall x (Trim(x, annabell) -> Alluring(annabell))\nforall x (Trim(x, linnie) -> Hugoesque(linnie))\nforall x (Trim(x, janaye) -> Chariot(x, annabell))\n\nAlluring(janaye)\n\nTrim(janaye, annabell) and forall x (Trim(x, annabell) -> Hinder(x, agnella)) -> therefore Hinder(janaye, agnella) Hinder(janaye, agnella) and forall x (Hinder(x, agnella) -> Hinder(x, annabell)) -> therefore Hinder(janaye, annabell) Hinder(janaye, annabell) and forall x (Hinder(x, annabell) -> Alluring(x)) -> therefore Alluring(janaye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The kristin cosign the julita. The garold habituate the sally. The julita is archival. The sally habituate the julita. If something habituate the julita then it is embodied. If something habituate the sally and the sally radio the julita then it is embodied. If something habituate the garold then it habituate the julita. If something is archival then it cosign the garold. If something cosign the julita then it habituate the garold. If something cosign the julita then the julita is embodied. If something cosign the sally then the sally is welcome. If something cosign the kristin then it radio the julita. The kristin is not embodied.", "logic": "\nCosign(kristin, julita)\nHabituate(garold, sally)\nArchival(julita)\nHabituate(sally, julita)\nforall x (Habituate(x, julita) -> Embodied(x))\nforall x (Habituate(x, sally) and Radio(sally, julita) -> Embodied(x))\nforall x (Habituate(x, garold) -> Habituate(x, julita))\nforall x (Archival(x) -> Cosign(x, garold))\nforall x (Cosign(x, julita) -> Habituate(x, garold))\nforall x (Cosign(x, julita) -> Embodied(julita))\nforall x (Cosign(x, sally) -> Welcome(sally))\nforall x (Cosign(x, kristin) -> Radio(x, julita))\n\nnot Embodied(kristin)\n\nCosign(kristin, julita) and forall x (Cosign(x, julita) -> Habituate(x, garold)) -> therefore Habituate(kristin, garold) Habituate(kristin, garold) and forall x (Habituate(x, garold) -> Habituate(x, julita)) -> therefore Habituate(kristin, julita) Habituate(kristin, julita) and forall x (Habituate(x, julita) -> Embodied(x)) -> therefore Embodied(kristin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The christ snow the nicoli. The polly nick the solomon. The nicoli is antemortem. The solomon nick the nicoli. If something nick the nicoli then it is xxxiii. If something nick the solomon and the solomon puke the nicoli then it is xxxiii. If something nick the polly then it nick the nicoli. If something is antemortem then it snow the polly. If something snow the nicoli then it nick the polly. If something snow the nicoli then the nicoli is xxxiii. If something snow the solomon then the solomon is tractive. If something snow the christ then it puke the nicoli. The polly is not xxxiii.", "logic": "\nSnow(christ, nicoli)\nNick(polly, solomon)\nAntemortem(nicoli)\nNick(solomon, nicoli)\nforall x (Nick(x, nicoli) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Nick(x, solomon) and Puke(solomon, nicoli) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Nick(x, polly) -> Nick(x, nicoli))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> Snow(x, polly))\nforall x (Snow(x, nicoli) -> Nick(x, polly))\nforall x (Snow(x, nicoli) -> Xxxiii(nicoli))\nforall x (Snow(x, solomon) -> Tractive(solomon))\nforall x (Snow(x, christ) -> Puke(x, nicoli))\n\nnot Xxxiii(polly)\n\nforall x (Nick(x, nicoli) -> Xxxiii(x)) <- forall x (Nick(x, polly) -> Nick(x, nicoli)) <- forall x (Snow(x, nicoli) -> Nick(x, polly)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The rand enwrap the sheryl. The sunshine babble the wynn. The sheryl is orthoptic. The wynn babble the sheryl. If something babble the sheryl then it is bregmatic. If something babble the wynn and the wynn fine the sheryl then it is bregmatic. If something babble the sunshine then it babble the sheryl. If something is orthoptic then it enwrap the sunshine. If something enwrap the sheryl then it babble the sunshine. If something enwrap the sheryl then the sheryl is bregmatic. If something enwrap the wynn then the wynn is albinal. If something enwrap the rand then it fine the sheryl. The wynn enwrap the sunshine.", "logic": "\nEnwrap(rand, sheryl)\nBabble(sunshine, wynn)\nOrthoptic(sheryl)\nBabble(wynn, sheryl)\nforall x (Babble(x, sheryl) -> Bregmatic(x))\nforall x (Babble(x, wynn) and Fine(wynn, sheryl) -> Bregmatic(x))\nforall x (Babble(x, sunshine) -> Babble(x, sheryl))\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) -> Enwrap(x, sunshine))\nforall x (Enwrap(x, sheryl) -> Babble(x, sunshine))\nforall x (Enwrap(x, sheryl) -> Bregmatic(sheryl))\nforall x (Enwrap(x, wynn) -> Albinal(wynn))\nforall x (Enwrap(x, rand) -> Fine(x, sheryl))\n\nEnwrap(wynn, sunshine)\n\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) -> Enwrap(x, sunshine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The dimitrios equal the clovis. The valeria piggyback the bee. The clovis is pacific. The bee piggyback the clovis. If something piggyback the clovis then it is uneasy. If something piggyback the bee and the bee jeer the clovis then it is uneasy. If something piggyback the valeria then it piggyback the clovis. If something is pacific then it equal the valeria. If something equal the clovis then it piggyback the valeria. If something equal the clovis then the clovis is uneasy. If something equal the bee then the bee is unmatched. If something equal the dimitrios then it jeer the clovis. The dimitrios does not eat the clovis.", "logic": "\nEqual(dimitrios, clovis)\nPiggyback(valeria, bee)\nPacific(clovis)\nPiggyback(bee, clovis)\nforall x (Piggyback(x, clovis) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, bee) and Jeer(bee, clovis) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, valeria) -> Piggyback(x, clovis))\nforall x (Pacific(x) -> Equal(x, valeria))\nforall x (Equal(x, clovis) -> Piggyback(x, valeria))\nforall x (Equal(x, clovis) -> Uneasy(clovis))\nforall x (Equal(x, bee) -> Unmatched(bee))\nforall x (Equal(x, dimitrios) -> Jeer(x, clovis))\n\nnot Jeer(dimitrios, clovis)\n\nforall x (Equal(x, dimitrios) -> Jeer(x, clovis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The lavena peal the carolin. The nicholle habituate the denna. The carolin is vaporous. The denna habituate the carolin. If something habituate the carolin then it is avirulent. If something habituate the denna and the denna copyedit the carolin then it is avirulent. If something habituate the nicholle then it habituate the carolin. If something is vaporous then it peal the nicholle. If something peal the carolin then it habituate the nicholle. If something peal the carolin then the carolin is avirulent. If something peal the denna then the denna is acheronian. If something peal the lavena then it copyedit the carolin. The carolin habituate the carolin.", "logic": "\nPeal(lavena, carolin)\nHabituate(nicholle, denna)\nVaporous(carolin)\nHabituate(denna, carolin)\nforall x (Habituate(x, carolin) -> Avirulent(x))\nforall x (Habituate(x, denna) and Copyedit(denna, carolin) -> Avirulent(x))\nforall x (Habituate(x, nicholle) -> Habituate(x, carolin))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Peal(x, nicholle))\nforall x (Peal(x, carolin) -> Habituate(x, nicholle))\nforall x (Peal(x, carolin) -> Avirulent(carolin))\nforall x (Peal(x, denna) -> Acheronian(denna))\nforall x (Peal(x, lavena) -> Copyedit(x, carolin))\n\nHabituate(carolin, carolin)\n\nforall x (Habituate(x, nicholle) -> Habituate(x, carolin)) <- forall x (Peal(x, carolin) -> Habituate(x, nicholle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The erik complicate the hamlen. The linus cram the ephrem. The hamlen is actinoid. The ephrem cram the hamlen. If something cram the hamlen then it is parky. If something cram the ephrem and the ephrem hasten the hamlen then it is parky. If something cram the linus then it cram the hamlen. If something is actinoid then it complicate the linus. If something complicate the hamlen then it cram the linus. If something complicate the hamlen then the hamlen is parky. If something complicate the ephrem then the ephrem is rootbound. If something complicate the erik then it hasten the hamlen. The erik does not chase the ephrem.", "logic": "\nComplicate(erik, hamlen)\nCram(linus, ephrem)\nActinoid(hamlen)\nCram(ephrem, hamlen)\nforall x (Cram(x, hamlen) -> Parky(x))\nforall x (Cram(x, ephrem) and Hasten(ephrem, hamlen) -> Parky(x))\nforall x (Cram(x, linus) -> Cram(x, hamlen))\nforall x (Actinoid(x) -> Complicate(x, linus))\nforall x (Complicate(x, hamlen) -> Cram(x, linus))\nforall x (Complicate(x, hamlen) -> Parky(hamlen))\nforall x (Complicate(x, ephrem) -> Rootbound(ephrem))\nforall x (Complicate(x, erik) -> Hasten(x, hamlen))\n\nnot Complicate(erik, ephrem)\n\nnot Complicate(erik, ephrem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The tybalt root the hersch. The mitchell coal the carlena. The hersch is backstair. The carlena coal the hersch. If something coal the hersch then it is agone. If something coal the carlena and the carlena relieve the hersch then it is agone. If something coal the mitchell then it coal the hersch. If something is backstair then it root the mitchell. If something root the hersch then it coal the mitchell. If something root the hersch then the hersch is agone. If something root the carlena then the carlena is westward. If something root the tybalt then it relieve the hersch. The tybalt relieve the tybalt.", "logic": "\nRoot(tybalt, hersch)\nCoal(mitchell, carlena)\nBackstair(hersch)\nCoal(carlena, hersch)\nforall x (Coal(x, hersch) -> Agone(x))\nforall x (Coal(x, carlena) and Relieve(carlena, hersch) -> Agone(x))\nforall x (Coal(x, mitchell) -> Coal(x, hersch))\nforall x (Backstair(x) -> Root(x, mitchell))\nforall x (Root(x, hersch) -> Coal(x, mitchell))\nforall x (Root(x, hersch) -> Agone(hersch))\nforall x (Root(x, carlena) -> Westward(carlena))\nforall x (Root(x, tybalt) -> Relieve(x, hersch))\n\nRelieve(tybalt, tybalt)\n\nRelieve(tybalt, tybalt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The sioux govern the gaven. The lilyan accord the leslie. The gaven is exegetic. The leslie accord the gaven. If something accord the gaven then it is spruce. If something accord the leslie and the leslie force the gaven then it is spruce. If something accord the lilyan then it accord the gaven. If something is exegetic then it govern the lilyan. If something govern the gaven then it accord the lilyan. If something govern the gaven then the gaven is spruce. If something govern the leslie then the leslie is stuffy. If something govern the sioux then it force the gaven. The gaven does not eat the sioux.", "logic": "\nGovern(sioux, gaven)\nAccord(lilyan, leslie)\nExegetic(gaven)\nAccord(leslie, gaven)\nforall x (Accord(x, gaven) -> Spruce(x))\nforall x (Accord(x, leslie) and Force(leslie, gaven) -> Spruce(x))\nforall x (Accord(x, lilyan) -> Accord(x, gaven))\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Govern(x, lilyan))\nforall x (Govern(x, gaven) -> Accord(x, lilyan))\nforall x (Govern(x, gaven) -> Spruce(gaven))\nforall x (Govern(x, leslie) -> Stuffy(leslie))\nforall x (Govern(x, sioux) -> Force(x, gaven))\n\nnot Force(gaven, sioux)\n\nnot Force(gaven, sioux) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The leila fustigate the jaleh. The kacy begrime the verina. The jaleh is mournful. The verina begrime the jaleh. If something begrime the jaleh then it is concerted. If something begrime the verina and the verina truckle the jaleh then it is concerted. If something begrime the kacy then it begrime the jaleh. If something is mournful then it fustigate the kacy. If something fustigate the jaleh then it begrime the kacy. If something fustigate the jaleh then the jaleh is concerted. If something fustigate the verina then the verina is porticoed. If something fustigate the leila then it truckle the jaleh. The jaleh is nice.", "logic": "\nFustigate(leila, jaleh)\nBegrime(kacy, verina)\nMournful(jaleh)\nBegrime(verina, jaleh)\nforall x (Begrime(x, jaleh) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Begrime(x, verina) and Truckle(verina, jaleh) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Begrime(x, kacy) -> Begrime(x, jaleh))\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Fustigate(x, kacy))\nforall x (Fustigate(x, jaleh) -> Begrime(x, kacy))\nforall x (Fustigate(x, jaleh) -> Concerted(jaleh))\nforall x (Fustigate(x, verina) -> Porticoed(verina))\nforall x (Fustigate(x, leila) -> Truckle(x, jaleh))\n\nNice(jaleh)\n\nNice(jaleh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-884"} {"premises": "The ursala bail the sanders. The kath cannon the sanders. The kath is nilotic. The kath is stunned. The kath scramble the ursala. The sanders cannon the ursala. The sanders cannon the kath. The sanders bail the ursala. The sanders is principal. The sanders scramble the kath. If something scramble the ursala and it is nilotic then the ursala scramble the sanders. If something bail the ursala and it is unraised then the ursala bail the sanders. The sanders cannon the ursala.", "logic": "\nBail(ursala, sanders)\nCannon(kath, sanders)\nNilotic(kath)\nStunned(kath)\nScramble(kath, ursala)\nCannon(sanders, ursala)\nCannon(sanders, kath)\nBail(sanders, ursala)\nPrincipal(sanders)\nScramble(sanders, kath)\nforall x (Scramble(x, ursala) and Nilotic(x) -> Scramble(ursala, sanders))\nforall x (Bail(x, ursala) and Unraised(x) -> Bail(ursala, sanders))\n\nCannon(sanders, ursala)\n\ntherefore Cannon(sanders, ursala)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2786"} {"premises": "The cynthia boggle the filide. The yevette punt the filide. The yevette is weighted. The yevette is saxon. The yevette revitalize the cynthia. The filide punt the cynthia. The filide punt the yevette. The filide boggle the cynthia. The filide is sporting. The filide revitalize the yevette. If something revitalize the cynthia and it is weighted then the cynthia revitalize the filide. If something boggle the cynthia and it is unexcused then the cynthia boggle the filide. The yevette does not chase the filide.", "logic": "\nBoggle(cynthia, filide)\nPunt(yevette, filide)\nWeighted(yevette)\nSaxon(yevette)\nRevitalize(yevette, cynthia)\nPunt(filide, cynthia)\nPunt(filide, yevette)\nBoggle(filide, cynthia)\nSporting(filide)\nRevitalize(filide, yevette)\nforall x (Revitalize(x, cynthia) and Weighted(x) -> Revitalize(cynthia, filide))\nforall x (Boggle(x, cynthia) and Unexcused(x) -> Boggle(cynthia, filide))\n\nnot Punt(yevette, filide)\n\ntherefore Punt(yevette, filide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2786"} {"premises": "The alane whipsaw the vinny. The grover noise the vinny. The grover is epidermic. The grover is exchanged. The grover page the alane. The vinny noise the alane. The vinny noise the grover. The vinny whipsaw the alane. The vinny is nonimmune. The vinny page the grover. If something page the alane and it is epidermic then the alane page the vinny. If something whipsaw the alane and it is corinthian then the alane whipsaw the vinny. The alane is not epidermic.", "logic": "\nWhipsaw(alane, vinny)\nNoise(grover, vinny)\nEpidermic(grover)\nExchanged(grover)\nPage(grover, alane)\nNoise(vinny, alane)\nNoise(vinny, grover)\nWhipsaw(vinny, alane)\nNonimmune(vinny)\nPage(vinny, grover)\nforall x (Page(x, alane) and Epidermic(x) -> Page(alane, vinny))\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, alane) and Corinthian(x) -> Whipsaw(alane, vinny))\n\nnot Epidermic(alane)\n\nnot Epidermic(alane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2786"} {"premises": "The christie configure the carlina. The tobiah snicker the carlina. The tobiah is atheist. The tobiah is hertzian. The tobiah rusticate the christie. The carlina snicker the christie. The carlina snicker the tobiah. The carlina configure the christie. The carlina is calumnious. The carlina rusticate the tobiah. If something rusticate the christie and it is atheist then the christie rusticate the carlina. If something configure the christie and it is verminous then the christie configure the carlina. The carlina rusticate the christie.", "logic": "\nConfigure(christie, carlina)\nSnicker(tobiah, carlina)\nAtheist(tobiah)\nHertzian(tobiah)\nRusticate(tobiah, christie)\nSnicker(carlina, christie)\nSnicker(carlina, tobiah)\nConfigure(carlina, christie)\nCalumnious(carlina)\nRusticate(carlina, tobiah)\nforall x (Rusticate(x, christie) and Atheist(x) -> Rusticate(christie, carlina))\nforall x (Configure(x, christie) and Verminous(x) -> Configure(christie, carlina))\n\nRusticate(carlina, christie)\n\nRusticate(carlina, christie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2786"} {"premises": "Alanah is arachnoid. Querida is not unchanged. Concordia is enervating. Britt is unchanged. If someone is cuspate then they are drugged. If someone is arachnoid then they are cuspate. Rough, enervating people are frosty. If Querida is cutting and Querida is unchanged then Querida is not enervating. All drugged people are unchanged. If someone is cutting then they are unchanged. If Britt is cutting then Britt is not unchanged. If Britt is frosty and Britt is not drugged then Britt is cutting. Alanah is arachnoid.", "logic": "\nArachnoid(alanah)\nnot Unchanged(querida)\nEnervating(concordia)\nUnchanged(britt)\nforall x (Cuspate(x) -> Drugged(x))\nforall x (Arachnoid(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) and Enervating(x) -> Frosty(x))\nCutting(querida) and Unchanged(querida) -> not Enervating(querida)\nforall x (Drugged(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nCutting(britt) -> not Unchanged(britt)\nFrosty(britt) and not Drugged(britt) -> Cutting(britt)\n\nArachnoid(alanah)\n\ntherefore Arachnoid(alanah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Florella is possessed. Mathilda is not constant. Oprah is sham. Nichol is constant. If someone is lunatic then they are parked. If someone is possessed then they are lunatic. Rough, sham people are foliaceous. If Mathilda is apologetic and Mathilda is constant then Mathilda is not sham. All parked people are constant. If someone is apologetic then they are constant. If Nichol is apologetic then Nichol is not constant. If Nichol is foliaceous and Nichol is not parked then Nichol is apologetic. Mathilda is constant.", "logic": "\nPossessed(florella)\nnot Constant(mathilda)\nSham(oprah)\nConstant(nichol)\nforall x (Lunatic(x) -> Parked(x))\nforall x (Possessed(x) -> Lunatic(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) and Sham(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nApologetic(mathilda) and Constant(mathilda) -> not Sham(mathilda)\nforall x (Parked(x) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Constant(x))\nApologetic(nichol) -> not Constant(nichol)\nFoliaceous(nichol) and not Parked(nichol) -> Apologetic(nichol)\n\nConstant(mathilda)\n\ntherefore not Constant(mathilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Salvador is regulation. Karalee is not planetary. Ulric is pessimal. Giorgia is planetary. If someone is fenestral then they are eventual. If someone is regulation then they are fenestral. Rough, pessimal people are vixenish. If Karalee is offending and Karalee is planetary then Karalee is not pessimal. All eventual people are planetary. If someone is offending then they are planetary. If Giorgia is offending then Giorgia is not planetary. If Giorgia is vixenish and Giorgia is not eventual then Giorgia is offending. Salvador is fenestral.", "logic": "\nRegulation(salvador)\nnot Planetary(karalee)\nPessimal(ulric)\nPlanetary(giorgia)\nforall x (Fenestral(x) -> Eventual(x))\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> Fenestral(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) and Pessimal(x) -> Vixenish(x))\nOffending(karalee) and Planetary(karalee) -> not Pessimal(karalee)\nforall x (Eventual(x) -> Planetary(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) -> Planetary(x))\nOffending(giorgia) -> not Planetary(giorgia)\nVixenish(giorgia) and not Eventual(giorgia) -> Offending(giorgia)\n\nFenestral(salvador)\n\nRegulation(salvador) and forall x (Regulation(x) -> Fenestral(x)) -> therefore Fenestral(salvador)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Lelah is spheroidal. Yankee is not pixilated. Marie is fungous. Viv is pixilated. If someone is inbound then they are acrogenic. If someone is spheroidal then they are inbound. Rough, fungous people are hearable. If Yankee is obese and Yankee is pixilated then Yankee is not fungous. All acrogenic people are pixilated. If someone is obese then they are pixilated. If Viv is obese then Viv is not pixilated. If Viv is hearable and Viv is not acrogenic then Viv is obese. Lelah is not inbound.", "logic": "\nSpheroidal(lelah)\nnot Pixilated(yankee)\nFungous(marie)\nPixilated(viv)\nforall x (Inbound(x) -> Acrogenic(x))\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) -> Inbound(x))\nforall x (Obese(x) and Fungous(x) -> Hearable(x))\nObese(yankee) and Pixilated(yankee) -> not Fungous(yankee)\nforall x (Acrogenic(x) -> Pixilated(x))\nforall x (Obese(x) -> Pixilated(x))\nObese(viv) -> not Pixilated(viv)\nHearable(viv) and not Acrogenic(viv) -> Obese(viv)\n\nnot Inbound(lelah)\n\nSpheroidal(lelah) and forall x (Spheroidal(x) -> Inbound(x)) -> therefore Inbound(lelah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Renault is dantesque. Maurene is not tilled. Gerome is naughty. Gerrilee is tilled. If someone is abstract then they are algonquian. If someone is dantesque then they are abstract. Rough, naughty people are gleaming. If Maurene is vapourised and Maurene is tilled then Maurene is not naughty. All algonquian people are tilled. If someone is vapourised then they are tilled. If Gerrilee is vapourised then Gerrilee is not tilled. If Gerrilee is gleaming and Gerrilee is not algonquian then Gerrilee is vapourised. Renault is algonquian.", "logic": "\nDantesque(renault)\nnot Tilled(maurene)\nNaughty(gerome)\nTilled(gerrilee)\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Algonquian(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Abstract(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Naughty(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nVapourised(maurene) and Tilled(maurene) -> not Naughty(maurene)\nforall x (Algonquian(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Tilled(x))\nVapourised(gerrilee) -> not Tilled(gerrilee)\nGleaming(gerrilee) and not Algonquian(gerrilee) -> Vapourised(gerrilee)\n\nAlgonquian(renault)\n\nDantesque(renault) and forall x (Dantesque(x) -> Abstract(x)) -> therefore Abstract(renault) Abstract(renault) and forall x (Abstract(x) -> Algonquian(x)) -> therefore Algonquian(renault)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Amelie is downy. Franz is not diazo. Arabel is oncoming. Mara is diazo. If someone is licensed then they are easygoing. If someone is downy then they are licensed. Rough, oncoming people are prim. If Franz is dazzled and Franz is diazo then Franz is not oncoming. All easygoing people are diazo. If someone is dazzled then they are diazo. If Mara is dazzled then Mara is not diazo. If Mara is prim and Mara is not easygoing then Mara is dazzled. Amelie is not easygoing.", "logic": "\nDowny(amelie)\nnot Diazo(franz)\nOncoming(arabel)\nDiazo(mara)\nforall x (Licensed(x) -> Easygoing(x))\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) and Oncoming(x) -> Prim(x))\nDazzled(franz) and Diazo(franz) -> not Oncoming(franz)\nforall x (Easygoing(x) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) -> Diazo(x))\nDazzled(mara) -> not Diazo(mara)\nPrim(mara) and not Easygoing(mara) -> Dazzled(mara)\n\nnot Easygoing(amelie)\n\nDowny(amelie) and forall x (Downy(x) -> Licensed(x)) -> therefore Licensed(amelie) Licensed(amelie) and forall x (Licensed(x) -> Easygoing(x)) -> therefore Easygoing(amelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Peggie is shoddy. Annabel is not rapid. Ambrose is caseous. Alwin is rapid. If someone is profane then they are handled. If someone is shoddy then they are profane. Rough, caseous people are scaly. If Annabel is suspicious and Annabel is rapid then Annabel is not caseous. All handled people are rapid. If someone is suspicious then they are rapid. If Alwin is suspicious then Alwin is not rapid. If Alwin is scaly and Alwin is not handled then Alwin is suspicious. Peggie is rapid.", "logic": "\nShoddy(peggie)\nnot Rapid(annabel)\nCaseous(ambrose)\nRapid(alwin)\nforall x (Profane(x) -> Handled(x))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> Profane(x))\nforall x (Suspicious(x) and Caseous(x) -> Scaly(x))\nSuspicious(annabel) and Rapid(annabel) -> not Caseous(annabel)\nforall x (Handled(x) -> Rapid(x))\nforall x (Suspicious(x) -> Rapid(x))\nSuspicious(alwin) -> not Rapid(alwin)\nScaly(alwin) and not Handled(alwin) -> Suspicious(alwin)\n\nRapid(peggie)\n\nShoddy(peggie) and forall x (Shoddy(x) -> Profane(x)) -> therefore Profane(peggie) Profane(peggie) and forall x (Profane(x) -> Handled(x)) -> therefore Handled(peggie) Handled(peggie) and forall x (Handled(x) -> Rapid(x)) -> therefore Rapid(peggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Rissa is choosey. Locke is not xxiv. Benita is tiny. Jimbo is xxiv. If someone is glomerular then they are planless. If someone is choosey then they are glomerular. Rough, tiny people are stone. If Locke is migratory and Locke is xxiv then Locke is not tiny. All planless people are xxiv. If someone is migratory then they are xxiv. If Jimbo is migratory then Jimbo is not xxiv. If Jimbo is stone and Jimbo is not planless then Jimbo is migratory. Rissa is not xxiv.", "logic": "\nChoosey(rissa)\nnot Xxiv(locke)\nTiny(benita)\nXxiv(jimbo)\nforall x (Glomerular(x) -> Planless(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Glomerular(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Tiny(x) -> Stone(x))\nMigratory(locke) and Xxiv(locke) -> not Tiny(locke)\nforall x (Planless(x) -> Xxiv(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) -> Xxiv(x))\nMigratory(jimbo) -> not Xxiv(jimbo)\nStone(jimbo) and not Planless(jimbo) -> Migratory(jimbo)\n\nnot Xxiv(rissa)\n\nChoosey(rissa) and forall x (Choosey(x) -> Glomerular(x)) -> therefore Glomerular(rissa) Glomerular(rissa) and forall x (Glomerular(x) -> Planless(x)) -> therefore Planless(rissa) Planless(rissa) and forall x (Planless(x) -> Xxiv(x)) -> therefore Xxiv(rissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Wini is living. Matteo is not inky. Yetty is spare. Auria is inky. If someone is paleozoic then they are pederastic. If someone is living then they are paleozoic. Rough, spare people are lxiv. If Matteo is umptieth and Matteo is inky then Matteo is not spare. All pederastic people are inky. If someone is umptieth then they are inky. If Auria is umptieth then Auria is not inky. If Auria is lxiv and Auria is not pederastic then Auria is umptieth. Yetty is not pederastic.", "logic": "\nLiving(wini)\nnot Inky(matteo)\nSpare(yetty)\nInky(auria)\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) -> Pederastic(x))\nforall x (Living(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Umptieth(x) and Spare(x) -> Lxiv(x))\nUmptieth(matteo) and Inky(matteo) -> not Spare(matteo)\nforall x (Pederastic(x) -> Inky(x))\nforall x (Umptieth(x) -> Inky(x))\nUmptieth(auria) -> not Inky(auria)\nLxiv(auria) and not Pederastic(auria) -> Umptieth(auria)\n\nnot Pederastic(yetty)\n\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) -> Pederastic(x)) <- forall x (Living(x) -> Paleozoic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Madona is erose. Bryan is not antiguan. Ariela is authorised. Jabez is antiguan. If someone is sparkly then they are quaternate. If someone is erose then they are sparkly. Rough, authorised people are papistic. If Bryan is autosomal and Bryan is antiguan then Bryan is not authorised. All quaternate people are antiguan. If someone is autosomal then they are antiguan. If Jabez is autosomal then Jabez is not antiguan. If Jabez is papistic and Jabez is not quaternate then Jabez is autosomal. Jabez is papistic.", "logic": "\nErose(madona)\nnot Antiguan(bryan)\nAuthorised(ariela)\nAntiguan(jabez)\nforall x (Sparkly(x) -> Quaternate(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) -> Sparkly(x))\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Authorised(x) -> Papistic(x))\nAutosomal(bryan) and Antiguan(bryan) -> not Authorised(bryan)\nforall x (Quaternate(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Autosomal(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nAutosomal(jabez) -> not Antiguan(jabez)\nPapistic(jabez) and not Quaternate(jabez) -> Autosomal(jabez)\n\nPapistic(jabez)\n\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Authorised(x) -> Papistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Dayna is brummagem. Audrye is not grouped. Giffard is prongy. Tine is grouped. If someone is monied then they are briny. If someone is brummagem then they are monied. Rough, prongy people are designed. If Audrye is constant and Audrye is grouped then Audrye is not prongy. All briny people are grouped. If someone is constant then they are grouped. If Tine is constant then Tine is not grouped. If Tine is designed and Tine is not briny then Tine is constant. Tine is not monied.", "logic": "\nBrummagem(dayna)\nnot Grouped(audrye)\nProngy(giffard)\nGrouped(tine)\nforall x (Monied(x) -> Briny(x))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Monied(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) and Prongy(x) -> Designed(x))\nConstant(audrye) and Grouped(audrye) -> not Prongy(audrye)\nforall x (Briny(x) -> Grouped(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) -> Grouped(x))\nConstant(tine) -> not Grouped(tine)\nDesigned(tine) and not Briny(tine) -> Constant(tine)\n\nnot Monied(tine)\n\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Monied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Ernestine is gentile. Kay is not balconied. Gabie is extensive. Adeline is balconied. If someone is unequipped then they are mortified. If someone is gentile then they are unequipped. Rough, extensive people are quartzose. If Kay is scholastic and Kay is balconied then Kay is not extensive. All mortified people are balconied. If someone is scholastic then they are balconied. If Adeline is scholastic then Adeline is not balconied. If Adeline is quartzose and Adeline is not mortified then Adeline is scholastic. Gabie is unequipped.", "logic": "\nGentile(ernestine)\nnot Balconied(kay)\nExtensive(gabie)\nBalconied(adeline)\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Mortified(x))\nforall x (Gentile(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) and Extensive(x) -> Quartzose(x))\nScholastic(kay) and Balconied(kay) -> not Extensive(kay)\nforall x (Mortified(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Balconied(x))\nScholastic(adeline) -> not Balconied(adeline)\nQuartzose(adeline) and not Mortified(adeline) -> Scholastic(adeline)\n\nUnequipped(gabie)\n\nforall x (Gentile(x) -> Unequipped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Elijah is impendent. Reza is not unrepaired. Stern is precedent. Davis is unrepaired. If someone is visualised then they are nibbed. If someone is impendent then they are visualised. Rough, precedent people are cased. If Reza is plaintive and Reza is unrepaired then Reza is not precedent. All nibbed people are unrepaired. If someone is plaintive then they are unrepaired. If Davis is plaintive then Davis is not unrepaired. If Davis is cased and Davis is not nibbed then Davis is plaintive. Davis is not impendent.", "logic": "\nImpendent(elijah)\nnot Unrepaired(reza)\nPrecedent(stern)\nUnrepaired(davis)\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> Nibbed(x))\nforall x (Impendent(x) -> Visualised(x))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) and Precedent(x) -> Cased(x))\nPlaintive(reza) and Unrepaired(reza) -> not Precedent(reza)\nforall x (Nibbed(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nPlaintive(davis) -> not Unrepaired(davis)\nCased(davis) and not Nibbed(davis) -> Plaintive(davis)\n\nnot Impendent(davis)\n\nnot Impendent(davis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Jonathon is leathery. Ciel is not scrimy. Doria is intrusive. Jobi is scrimy. If someone is manly then they are satiable. If someone is leathery then they are manly. Rough, intrusive people are ironclad. If Ciel is uneconomic and Ciel is scrimy then Ciel is not intrusive. All satiable people are scrimy. If someone is uneconomic then they are scrimy. If Jobi is uneconomic then Jobi is not scrimy. If Jobi is ironclad and Jobi is not satiable then Jobi is uneconomic. Jobi is intrusive.", "logic": "\nLeathery(jonathon)\nnot Scrimy(ciel)\nIntrusive(doria)\nScrimy(jobi)\nforall x (Manly(x) -> Satiable(x))\nforall x (Leathery(x) -> Manly(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) and Intrusive(x) -> Ironclad(x))\nUneconomic(ciel) and Scrimy(ciel) -> not Intrusive(ciel)\nforall x (Satiable(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nUneconomic(jobi) -> not Scrimy(jobi)\nIronclad(jobi) and not Satiable(jobi) -> Uneconomic(jobi)\n\nIntrusive(jobi)\n\nIntrusive(jobi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Jonas is ruined. Glenda is not hyperfine. Woodrow is yeasty. Stephi is hyperfine. If someone is consuming then they are scabrous. If someone is ruined then they are consuming. Rough, yeasty people are misshapen. If Glenda is skinny and Glenda is hyperfine then Glenda is not yeasty. All scabrous people are hyperfine. If someone is skinny then they are hyperfine. If Stephi is skinny then Stephi is not hyperfine. If Stephi is misshapen and Stephi is not scabrous then Stephi is skinny. Glenda is not yeasty.", "logic": "\nRuined(jonas)\nnot Hyperfine(glenda)\nYeasty(woodrow)\nHyperfine(stephi)\nforall x (Consuming(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Ruined(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Skinny(x) and Yeasty(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nSkinny(glenda) and Hyperfine(glenda) -> not Yeasty(glenda)\nforall x (Scabrous(x) -> Hyperfine(x))\nforall x (Skinny(x) -> Hyperfine(x))\nSkinny(stephi) -> not Hyperfine(stephi)\nMisshapen(stephi) and not Scabrous(stephi) -> Skinny(stephi)\n\nnot Yeasty(glenda)\n\nnot Yeasty(glenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Michaela is undeniable. Roth is not discursive. Ivan is clotted. Sivert is discursive. If someone is running then they are bitterish. If someone is undeniable then they are running. Rough, clotted people are crispate. If Roth is astronomic and Roth is discursive then Roth is not clotted. All bitterish people are discursive. If someone is astronomic then they are discursive. If Sivert is astronomic then Sivert is not discursive. If Sivert is crispate and Sivert is not bitterish then Sivert is astronomic. Ivan is astronomic.", "logic": "\nUndeniable(michaela)\nnot Discursive(roth)\nClotted(ivan)\nDiscursive(sivert)\nforall x (Running(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Running(x))\nforall x (Astronomic(x) and Clotted(x) -> Crispate(x))\nAstronomic(roth) and Discursive(roth) -> not Clotted(roth)\nforall x (Bitterish(x) -> Discursive(x))\nforall x (Astronomic(x) -> Discursive(x))\nAstronomic(sivert) -> not Discursive(sivert)\nCrispate(sivert) and not Bitterish(sivert) -> Astronomic(sivert)\n\nAstronomic(ivan)\n\nAstronomic(ivan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Gil is unhatched. Gil is deskbound. Gil is polysemous. Richy is assisted. Richy is not deskbound. Dayle is assisted. Dayle is permeable. Dayle is polysemous. Cloe is assisted. Cloe is unhatched. Cloe is basipetal. Cloe is sobering. Red people are polysemous. If Gil is sobering then Gil is assisted. All sobering people are basipetal. All basipetal people are unhatched. If someone is deskbound then they are sobering. If Cloe is not assisted then Cloe is not unhatched. Green, basipetal people are not permeable. If Richy is deskbound and Richy is not sobering then Richy is not polysemous. Dayle is polysemous.", "logic": "\nUnhatched(gil)\nDeskbound(gil)\nPolysemous(gil)\nAssisted(richy)\nnot Deskbound(richy)\nAssisted(dayle)\nPermeable(dayle)\nPolysemous(dayle)\nAssisted(cloe)\nUnhatched(cloe)\nBasipetal(cloe)\nSobering(cloe)\nforall x (Basipetal(x) -> Polysemous(x))\nSobering(gil) -> Assisted(gil)\nforall x (Sobering(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Basipetal(x) -> Unhatched(x))\nforall x (Deskbound(x) -> Sobering(x))\nnot Assisted(cloe) -> not Unhatched(cloe)\nforall x (Unhatched(x) and Basipetal(x) -> not Permeable(x))\nDeskbound(richy) and not Sobering(richy) -> not Polysemous(richy)\n\nPolysemous(dayle)\n\ntherefore Polysemous(dayle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Gustavo is semiopaque. Gustavo is careful. Gustavo is lxxxvii. Ellis is bipinnate. Ellis is not careful. Ruthy is bipinnate. Ruthy is hypodermic. Ruthy is lxxxvii. Shaun is bipinnate. Shaun is semiopaque. Shaun is curving. Shaun is bantering. Red people are lxxxvii. If Gustavo is bantering then Gustavo is bipinnate. All bantering people are curving. All curving people are semiopaque. If someone is careful then they are bantering. If Shaun is not bipinnate then Shaun is not semiopaque. Green, curving people are not hypodermic. If Ellis is careful and Ellis is not bantering then Ellis is not lxxxvii. Ellis is careful.", "logic": "\nSemiopaque(gustavo)\nCareful(gustavo)\nLxxxvii(gustavo)\nBipinnate(ellis)\nnot Careful(ellis)\nBipinnate(ruthy)\nHypodermic(ruthy)\nLxxxvii(ruthy)\nBipinnate(shaun)\nSemiopaque(shaun)\nCurving(shaun)\nBantering(shaun)\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nBantering(gustavo) -> Bipinnate(gustavo)\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Semiopaque(x))\nforall x (Careful(x) -> Bantering(x))\nnot Bipinnate(shaun) -> not Semiopaque(shaun)\nforall x (Semiopaque(x) and Curving(x) -> not Hypodermic(x))\nCareful(ellis) and not Bantering(ellis) -> not Lxxxvii(ellis)\n\nCareful(ellis)\n\ntherefore not Careful(ellis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Ashby is prisonlike. Ashby is lone. Ashby is sheltered. Francene is untended. Francene is not lone. Keil is untended. Keil is boronic. Keil is sheltered. Vanda is untended. Vanda is prisonlike. Vanda is permeating. Vanda is apneic. Red people are sheltered. If Ashby is apneic then Ashby is untended. All apneic people are permeating. All permeating people are prisonlike. If someone is lone then they are apneic. If Vanda is not untended then Vanda is not prisonlike. Green, permeating people are not boronic. If Francene is lone and Francene is not apneic then Francene is not sheltered. Vanda is sheltered.", "logic": "\nPrisonlike(ashby)\nLone(ashby)\nSheltered(ashby)\nUntended(francene)\nnot Lone(francene)\nUntended(keil)\nBoronic(keil)\nSheltered(keil)\nUntended(vanda)\nPrisonlike(vanda)\nPermeating(vanda)\nApneic(vanda)\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Sheltered(x))\nApneic(ashby) -> Untended(ashby)\nforall x (Apneic(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Apneic(x))\nnot Untended(vanda) -> not Prisonlike(vanda)\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) and Permeating(x) -> not Boronic(x))\nLone(francene) and not Apneic(francene) -> not Sheltered(francene)\n\nSheltered(vanda)\n\nPermeating(vanda) and forall x (Permeating(x) -> Sheltered(x)) -> therefore Sheltered(vanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Gillan is aweless. Gillan is supperless. Gillan is rapturous. Phil is cacogenic. Phil is not supperless. Tonie is cacogenic. Tonie is lowering. Tonie is rapturous. Bird is cacogenic. Bird is aweless. Bird is enervated. Bird is blase. Red people are rapturous. If Gillan is blase then Gillan is cacogenic. All blase people are enervated. All enervated people are aweless. If someone is supperless then they are blase. If Bird is not cacogenic then Bird is not aweless. Green, enervated people are not lowering. If Phil is supperless and Phil is not blase then Phil is not rapturous. Bird is lowering.", "logic": "\nAweless(gillan)\nSupperless(gillan)\nRapturous(gillan)\nCacogenic(phil)\nnot Supperless(phil)\nCacogenic(tonie)\nLowering(tonie)\nRapturous(tonie)\nCacogenic(bird)\nAweless(bird)\nEnervated(bird)\nBlase(bird)\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Rapturous(x))\nBlase(gillan) -> Cacogenic(gillan)\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Enervated(x))\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Aweless(x))\nforall x (Supperless(x) -> Blase(x))\nnot Cacogenic(bird) -> not Aweless(bird)\nforall x (Aweless(x) and Enervated(x) -> not Lowering(x))\nSupperless(phil) and not Blase(phil) -> not Rapturous(phil)\n\nLowering(bird)\n\nAweless(bird) and Enervated(bird) and forall x (Aweless(x) and Enervated(x) -> not Lowering(x)) -> therefore not Lowering(bird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Marko is scythian. Marko is afghan. Marko is biologic. Mabel is trusting. Mabel is not afghan. Son is trusting. Son is sympatric. Son is biologic. Mitra is trusting. Mitra is scythian. Mitra is encyclical. Mitra is rich. Red people are biologic. If Marko is rich then Marko is trusting. All rich people are encyclical. All encyclical people are scythian. If someone is afghan then they are rich. If Mitra is not trusting then Mitra is not scythian. Green, encyclical people are not sympatric. If Mabel is afghan and Mabel is not rich then Mabel is not biologic. Marko is encyclical.", "logic": "\nScythian(marko)\nAfghan(marko)\nBiologic(marko)\nTrusting(mabel)\nnot Afghan(mabel)\nTrusting(son)\nSympatric(son)\nBiologic(son)\nTrusting(mitra)\nScythian(mitra)\nEncyclical(mitra)\nRich(mitra)\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Biologic(x))\nRich(marko) -> Trusting(marko)\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Scythian(x))\nforall x (Afghan(x) -> Rich(x))\nnot Trusting(mitra) -> not Scythian(mitra)\nforall x (Scythian(x) and Encyclical(x) -> not Sympatric(x))\nAfghan(mabel) and not Rich(mabel) -> not Biologic(mabel)\n\nEncyclical(marko)\n\nAfghan(marko) and forall x (Afghan(x) -> Rich(x)) -> therefore Rich(marko) Rich(marko) and forall x (Rich(x) -> Encyclical(x)) -> therefore Encyclical(marko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Carolyne is noncurrent. Carolyne is oviform. Carolyne is savoury. Charlott is dreary. Charlott is not oviform. Halley is dreary. Halley is inutile. Halley is savoury. Casie is dreary. Casie is noncurrent. Casie is logistical. Casie is scarce. Red people are savoury. If Carolyne is scarce then Carolyne is dreary. All scarce people are logistical. All logistical people are noncurrent. If someone is oviform then they are scarce. If Casie is not dreary then Casie is not noncurrent. Green, logistical people are not inutile. If Charlott is oviform and Charlott is not scarce then Charlott is not savoury. Carolyne is not dreary.", "logic": "\nNoncurrent(carolyne)\nOviform(carolyne)\nSavoury(carolyne)\nDreary(charlott)\nnot Oviform(charlott)\nDreary(halley)\nInutile(halley)\nSavoury(halley)\nDreary(casie)\nNoncurrent(casie)\nLogistical(casie)\nScarce(casie)\nforall x (Logistical(x) -> Savoury(x))\nScarce(carolyne) -> Dreary(carolyne)\nforall x (Scarce(x) -> Logistical(x))\nforall x (Logistical(x) -> Noncurrent(x))\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Scarce(x))\nnot Dreary(casie) -> not Noncurrent(casie)\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) and Logistical(x) -> not Inutile(x))\nOviform(charlott) and not Scarce(charlott) -> not Savoury(charlott)\n\nnot Dreary(carolyne)\n\nOviform(carolyne) and forall x (Oviform(x) -> Scarce(x)) -> therefore Scarce(carolyne) Scarce(carolyne) and Scarce(carolyne) -> Dreary(carolyne) -> therefore Dreary(carolyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Anallese is rushy. Anallese is innate. Anallese is pedestrian. Wandie is seared. Wandie is not innate. Ema is seared. Ema is grooved. Ema is pedestrian. Paulie is seared. Paulie is rushy. Paulie is inodorous. Paulie is motiveless. Red people are pedestrian. If Anallese is motiveless then Anallese is seared. All motiveless people are inodorous. All inodorous people are rushy. If someone is innate then they are motiveless. If Paulie is not seared then Paulie is not rushy. Green, inodorous people are not grooved. If Wandie is innate and Wandie is not motiveless then Wandie is not pedestrian. Anallese is not grooved.", "logic": "\nRushy(anallese)\nInnate(anallese)\nPedestrian(anallese)\nSeared(wandie)\nnot Innate(wandie)\nSeared(ema)\nGrooved(ema)\nPedestrian(ema)\nSeared(paulie)\nRushy(paulie)\nInodorous(paulie)\nMotiveless(paulie)\nforall x (Inodorous(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nMotiveless(anallese) -> Seared(anallese)\nforall x (Motiveless(x) -> Inodorous(x))\nforall x (Inodorous(x) -> Rushy(x))\nforall x (Innate(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nnot Seared(paulie) -> not Rushy(paulie)\nforall x (Rushy(x) and Inodorous(x) -> not Grooved(x))\nInnate(wandie) and not Motiveless(wandie) -> not Pedestrian(wandie)\n\nnot Grooved(anallese)\n\nInnate(anallese) and forall x (Innate(x) -> Motiveless(x)) -> therefore Motiveless(anallese) Motiveless(anallese) and forall x (Motiveless(x) -> Inodorous(x)) -> therefore Inodorous(anallese) Rushy(anallese) and Inodorous(anallese) and forall x (Rushy(x) and Inodorous(x) -> not Grooved(x)) -> therefore not Grooved(anallese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Donica is undreamed. Donica is driving. Donica is hedonic. Wildon is polysemous. Wildon is not driving. Berchtold is polysemous. Berchtold is alive. Berchtold is hedonic. Hillery is polysemous. Hillery is undreamed. Hillery is counter. Hillery is scalar. Red people are hedonic. If Donica is scalar then Donica is polysemous. All scalar people are counter. All counter people are undreamed. If someone is driving then they are scalar. If Hillery is not polysemous then Hillery is not undreamed. Green, counter people are not alive. If Wildon is driving and Wildon is not scalar then Wildon is not hedonic. Donica is alive.", "logic": "\nUndreamed(donica)\nDriving(donica)\nHedonic(donica)\nPolysemous(wildon)\nnot Driving(wildon)\nPolysemous(berchtold)\nAlive(berchtold)\nHedonic(berchtold)\nPolysemous(hillery)\nUndreamed(hillery)\nCounter(hillery)\nScalar(hillery)\nforall x (Counter(x) -> Hedonic(x))\nScalar(donica) -> Polysemous(donica)\nforall x (Scalar(x) -> Counter(x))\nforall x (Counter(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) -> Scalar(x))\nnot Polysemous(hillery) -> not Undreamed(hillery)\nforall x (Undreamed(x) and Counter(x) -> not Alive(x))\nDriving(wildon) and not Scalar(wildon) -> not Hedonic(wildon)\n\nAlive(donica)\n\nDriving(donica) and forall x (Driving(x) -> Scalar(x)) -> therefore Scalar(donica) Scalar(donica) and forall x (Scalar(x) -> Counter(x)) -> therefore Counter(donica) Undreamed(donica) and Counter(donica) and forall x (Undreamed(x) and Counter(x) -> not Alive(x)) -> therefore not Alive(donica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Charla is acidic. Charla is coital. Charla is agreeable. Eugenie is unplanted. Eugenie is not coital. Cherri is unplanted. Cherri is sagittate. Cherri is agreeable. Yoshiko is unplanted. Yoshiko is acidic. Yoshiko is mediate. Yoshiko is blown. Red people are agreeable. If Charla is blown then Charla is unplanted. All blown people are mediate. All mediate people are acidic. If someone is coital then they are blown. If Yoshiko is not unplanted then Yoshiko is not acidic. Green, mediate people are not sagittate. If Eugenie is coital and Eugenie is not blown then Eugenie is not agreeable. Eugenie is not blown.", "logic": "\nAcidic(charla)\nCoital(charla)\nAgreeable(charla)\nUnplanted(eugenie)\nnot Coital(eugenie)\nUnplanted(cherri)\nSagittate(cherri)\nAgreeable(cherri)\nUnplanted(yoshiko)\nAcidic(yoshiko)\nMediate(yoshiko)\nBlown(yoshiko)\nforall x (Mediate(x) -> Agreeable(x))\nBlown(charla) -> Unplanted(charla)\nforall x (Blown(x) -> Mediate(x))\nforall x (Mediate(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) -> Blown(x))\nnot Unplanted(yoshiko) -> not Acidic(yoshiko)\nforall x (Acidic(x) and Mediate(x) -> not Sagittate(x))\nCoital(eugenie) and not Blown(eugenie) -> not Agreeable(eugenie)\n\nnot Blown(eugenie)\n\nforall x (Coital(x) -> Blown(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Fredra is cernuous. Fredra is marvellous. Fredra is calyptrate. Danit is engrossed. Danit is not marvellous. Hyacintha is engrossed. Hyacintha is exergonic. Hyacintha is calyptrate. Barnard is engrossed. Barnard is cernuous. Barnard is jangly. Barnard is liverish. Red people are calyptrate. If Fredra is liverish then Fredra is engrossed. All liverish people are jangly. All jangly people are cernuous. If someone is marvellous then they are liverish. If Barnard is not engrossed then Barnard is not cernuous. Green, jangly people are not exergonic. If Danit is marvellous and Danit is not liverish then Danit is not calyptrate. Hyacintha is cernuous.", "logic": "\nCernuous(fredra)\nMarvellous(fredra)\nCalyptrate(fredra)\nEngrossed(danit)\nnot Marvellous(danit)\nEngrossed(hyacintha)\nExergonic(hyacintha)\nCalyptrate(hyacintha)\nEngrossed(barnard)\nCernuous(barnard)\nJangly(barnard)\nLiverish(barnard)\nforall x (Jangly(x) -> Calyptrate(x))\nLiverish(fredra) -> Engrossed(fredra)\nforall x (Liverish(x) -> Jangly(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) -> Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Liverish(x))\nnot Engrossed(barnard) -> not Cernuous(barnard)\nforall x (Cernuous(x) and Jangly(x) -> not Exergonic(x))\nMarvellous(danit) and not Liverish(danit) -> not Calyptrate(danit)\n\nCernuous(hyacintha)\n\nforall x (Jangly(x) -> Cernuous(x)) <- forall x (Liverish(x) -> Jangly(x)) <- forall x (Marvellous(x) -> Liverish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Karoline is urgent. Karoline is bleak. Karoline is shelled. Dewitt is frank. Dewitt is not bleak. Dela is frank. Dela is choppy. Dela is shelled. Ashleigh is frank. Ashleigh is urgent. Ashleigh is knifelike. Ashleigh is orbital. Red people are shelled. If Karoline is orbital then Karoline is frank. All orbital people are knifelike. All knifelike people are urgent. If someone is bleak then they are orbital. If Ashleigh is not frank then Ashleigh is not urgent. Green, knifelike people are not choppy. If Dewitt is bleak and Dewitt is not orbital then Dewitt is not shelled. Dewitt is not knifelike.", "logic": "\nUrgent(karoline)\nBleak(karoline)\nShelled(karoline)\nFrank(dewitt)\nnot Bleak(dewitt)\nFrank(dela)\nChoppy(dela)\nShelled(dela)\nFrank(ashleigh)\nUrgent(ashleigh)\nKnifelike(ashleigh)\nOrbital(ashleigh)\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Shelled(x))\nOrbital(karoline) -> Frank(karoline)\nforall x (Orbital(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) -> Urgent(x))\nforall x (Bleak(x) -> Orbital(x))\nnot Frank(ashleigh) -> not Urgent(ashleigh)\nforall x (Urgent(x) and Knifelike(x) -> not Choppy(x))\nBleak(dewitt) and not Orbital(dewitt) -> not Shelled(dewitt)\n\nnot Knifelike(dewitt)\n\nforall x (Orbital(x) -> Knifelike(x)) <- forall x (Bleak(x) -> Orbital(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Fifi is tending. Fifi is grayish. Fifi is lopsided. Jermayne is semiarid. Jermayne is not grayish. Brenn is semiarid. Brenn is mesial. Brenn is lopsided. Nathaniel is semiarid. Nathaniel is tending. Nathaniel is banned. Nathaniel is peevish. Red people are lopsided. If Fifi is peevish then Fifi is semiarid. All peevish people are banned. All banned people are tending. If someone is grayish then they are peevish. If Nathaniel is not semiarid then Nathaniel is not tending. Green, banned people are not mesial. If Jermayne is grayish and Jermayne is not peevish then Jermayne is not lopsided. Brenn is banned.", "logic": "\nTending(fifi)\nGrayish(fifi)\nLopsided(fifi)\nSemiarid(jermayne)\nnot Grayish(jermayne)\nSemiarid(brenn)\nMesial(brenn)\nLopsided(brenn)\nSemiarid(nathaniel)\nTending(nathaniel)\nBanned(nathaniel)\nPeevish(nathaniel)\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nPeevish(fifi) -> Semiarid(fifi)\nforall x (Peevish(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Tending(x))\nforall x (Grayish(x) -> Peevish(x))\nnot Semiarid(nathaniel) -> not Tending(nathaniel)\nforall x (Tending(x) and Banned(x) -> not Mesial(x))\nGrayish(jermayne) and not Peevish(jermayne) -> not Lopsided(jermayne)\n\nBanned(brenn)\n\nforall x (Peevish(x) -> Banned(x)) <- forall x (Grayish(x) -> Peevish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Maura is crippled. Maura is honorific. Maura is xiii. Martita is whacked. Martita is not honorific. Fawne is whacked. Fawne is enteral. Fawne is xiii. Garv is whacked. Garv is crippled. Garv is geared. Garv is wrinkly. Red people are xiii. If Maura is wrinkly then Maura is whacked. All wrinkly people are geared. All geared people are crippled. If someone is honorific then they are wrinkly. If Garv is not whacked then Garv is not crippled. Green, geared people are not enteral. If Martita is honorific and Martita is not wrinkly then Martita is not xiii. Garv is not honorific.", "logic": "\nCrippled(maura)\nHonorific(maura)\nXiii(maura)\nWhacked(martita)\nnot Honorific(martita)\nWhacked(fawne)\nEnteral(fawne)\nXiii(fawne)\nWhacked(garv)\nCrippled(garv)\nGeared(garv)\nWrinkly(garv)\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Xiii(x))\nWrinkly(maura) -> Whacked(maura)\nforall x (Wrinkly(x) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Crippled(x))\nforall x (Honorific(x) -> Wrinkly(x))\nnot Whacked(garv) -> not Crippled(garv)\nforall x (Crippled(x) and Geared(x) -> not Enteral(x))\nHonorific(martita) and not Wrinkly(martita) -> not Xiii(martita)\n\nnot Honorific(garv)\n\nnot Honorific(garv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "Roice is grueling. Roice is expansible. Roice is photic. Abdullah is bulgarian. Abdullah is not expansible. Robert is bulgarian. Robert is anginose. Robert is photic. Leoline is bulgarian. Leoline is grueling. Leoline is tiny. Leoline is unbiased. Red people are photic. If Roice is unbiased then Roice is bulgarian. All unbiased people are tiny. All tiny people are grueling. If someone is expansible then they are unbiased. If Leoline is not bulgarian then Leoline is not grueling. Green, tiny people are not anginose. If Abdullah is expansible and Abdullah is not unbiased then Abdullah is not photic. Abdullah is anginose.", "logic": "\nGrueling(roice)\nExpansible(roice)\nPhotic(roice)\nBulgarian(abdullah)\nnot Expansible(abdullah)\nBulgarian(robert)\nAnginose(robert)\nPhotic(robert)\nBulgarian(leoline)\nGrueling(leoline)\nTiny(leoline)\nUnbiased(leoline)\nforall x (Tiny(x) -> Photic(x))\nUnbiased(roice) -> Bulgarian(roice)\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Tiny(x))\nforall x (Tiny(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nnot Bulgarian(leoline) -> not Grueling(leoline)\nforall x (Grueling(x) and Tiny(x) -> not Anginose(x))\nExpansible(abdullah) and not Unbiased(abdullah) -> not Photic(abdullah)\n\nAnginose(abdullah)\n\nAnginose(abdullah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-883"} {"premises": "The duane is adsorbate. The cherin is hexagonal. The carlisle derive the duane. If something stagnate the carlisle then the carlisle is unplowed. The carlisle derive the duane.", "logic": "\nAdsorbate(duane)\nHexagonal(cherin)\nDerive(carlisle, duane)\nforall x (Stagnate(x, carlisle) -> Unplowed(carlisle))\n\nDerive(carlisle, duane)\n\ntherefore Derive(carlisle, duane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3890"} {"premises": "The aryn is nonplussed. The valaree is able. The reeva descale the aryn. If something prologize the reeva then the reeva is bogus. The valaree is not able.", "logic": "\nNonplussed(aryn)\nAble(valaree)\nDescale(reeva, aryn)\nforall x (Prologize(x, reeva) -> Bogus(reeva))\n\nnot Able(valaree)\n\ntherefore Able(valaree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3890"} {"premises": "The jaclyn is fake. The niels is moneyed. The cecilia tweak the jaclyn. If something singsong the cecilia then the cecilia is bicoloured. The cecilia is not bicoloured.", "logic": "\nFake(jaclyn)\nMoneyed(niels)\nTweak(cecilia, jaclyn)\nforall x (Singsong(x, cecilia) -> Bicoloured(cecilia))\n\nnot Bicoloured(cecilia)\n\nforall x (Singsong(x, cecilia) -> Bicoloured(cecilia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3890"} {"premises": "The bertine is jowly. The griff is unartistic. The andi surtax the bertine. If something attaint the andi then the andi is garbled. The andi is unartistic.", "logic": "\nJowly(bertine)\nUnartistic(griff)\nSurtax(andi, bertine)\nforall x (Attaint(x, andi) -> Garbled(andi))\n\nUnartistic(andi)\n\nUnartistic(andi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3890"} {"premises": "The lawrence is anaemic. If someone is labelled and venetian then they are not anaemic. Nice, dogged people are not anaemic. If someone is labelled and anaemic then they are fatalist. All anaemic, labelled people are not dogged. If someone is dogged and anaemic then they are venetian. If someone is anaemic then they are venetian. If the lawrence is venetian then the lawrence is dogged. If someone is anaemic and fatalist then they are labelled. The lawrence is anaemic.", "logic": "\nAnaemic(lawrence)\nforall x (Labelled(x) and Venetian(x) -> not Anaemic(x))\nforall x (Fatalist(x) and Dogged(x) -> not Anaemic(x))\nforall x (Labelled(x) and Anaemic(x) -> Fatalist(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) and Labelled(x) -> not Dogged(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) and Anaemic(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Venetian(x))\nVenetian(lawrence) -> Dogged(lawrence)\nforall x (Anaemic(x) and Fatalist(x) -> Labelled(x))\n\nAnaemic(lawrence)\n\ntherefore Anaemic(lawrence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The lynde is gaudy. If someone is uninviting and squeaky then they are not gaudy. Nice, carmelite people are not gaudy. If someone is uninviting and gaudy then they are abactinal. All gaudy, uninviting people are not carmelite. If someone is carmelite and gaudy then they are squeaky. If someone is gaudy then they are squeaky. If the lynde is squeaky then the lynde is carmelite. If someone is gaudy and abactinal then they are uninviting. The lynde is not gaudy.", "logic": "\nGaudy(lynde)\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Squeaky(x) -> not Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Abactinal(x) and Carmelite(x) -> not Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Gaudy(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Uninviting(x) -> not Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Carmelite(x) and Gaudy(x) -> Squeaky(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) -> Squeaky(x))\nSqueaky(lynde) -> Carmelite(lynde)\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Abactinal(x) -> Uninviting(x))\n\nnot Gaudy(lynde)\n\ntherefore Gaudy(lynde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The gennie is unsubdued. If someone is inerrant and unkempt then they are not unsubdued. Nice, aseptic people are not unsubdued. If someone is inerrant and unsubdued then they are dislocated. All unsubdued, inerrant people are not aseptic. If someone is aseptic and unsubdued then they are unkempt. If someone is unsubdued then they are unkempt. If the gennie is unkempt then the gennie is aseptic. If someone is unsubdued and dislocated then they are inerrant. The gennie is unkempt.", "logic": "\nUnsubdued(gennie)\nforall x (Inerrant(x) and Unkempt(x) -> not Unsubdued(x))\nforall x (Dislocated(x) and Aseptic(x) -> not Unsubdued(x))\nforall x (Inerrant(x) and Unsubdued(x) -> Dislocated(x))\nforall x (Unsubdued(x) and Inerrant(x) -> not Aseptic(x))\nforall x (Aseptic(x) and Unsubdued(x) -> Unkempt(x))\nforall x (Unsubdued(x) -> Unkempt(x))\nUnkempt(gennie) -> Aseptic(gennie)\nforall x (Unsubdued(x) and Dislocated(x) -> Inerrant(x))\n\nUnkempt(gennie)\n\nUnsubdued(gennie) and forall x (Unsubdued(x) -> Unkempt(x)) -> therefore Unkempt(gennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The cobby is beneficed. If someone is abstinent and multilevel then they are not beneficed. Nice, reformist people are not beneficed. If someone is abstinent and beneficed then they are whiskery. All beneficed, abstinent people are not reformist. If someone is reformist and beneficed then they are multilevel. If someone is beneficed then they are multilevel. If the cobby is multilevel then the cobby is reformist. If someone is beneficed and whiskery then they are abstinent. The cobby is not multilevel.", "logic": "\nBeneficed(cobby)\nforall x (Abstinent(x) and Multilevel(x) -> not Beneficed(x))\nforall x (Whiskery(x) and Reformist(x) -> not Beneficed(x))\nforall x (Abstinent(x) and Beneficed(x) -> Whiskery(x))\nforall x (Beneficed(x) and Abstinent(x) -> not Reformist(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) and Beneficed(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Beneficed(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nMultilevel(cobby) -> Reformist(cobby)\nforall x (Beneficed(x) and Whiskery(x) -> Abstinent(x))\n\nnot Multilevel(cobby)\n\nBeneficed(cobby) and forall x (Beneficed(x) -> Multilevel(x)) -> therefore Multilevel(cobby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The quinlan is maniac. If someone is chatoyant and clenched then they are not maniac. Nice, chichi people are not maniac. If someone is chatoyant and maniac then they are localised. All maniac, chatoyant people are not chichi. If someone is chichi and maniac then they are clenched. If someone is maniac then they are clenched. If the quinlan is clenched then the quinlan is chichi. If someone is maniac and localised then they are chatoyant. The quinlan is chichi.", "logic": "\nManiac(quinlan)\nforall x (Chatoyant(x) and Clenched(x) -> not Maniac(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) and Chichi(x) -> not Maniac(x))\nforall x (Chatoyant(x) and Maniac(x) -> Localised(x))\nforall x (Maniac(x) and Chatoyant(x) -> not Chichi(x))\nforall x (Chichi(x) and Maniac(x) -> Clenched(x))\nforall x (Maniac(x) -> Clenched(x))\nClenched(quinlan) -> Chichi(quinlan)\nforall x (Maniac(x) and Localised(x) -> Chatoyant(x))\n\nChichi(quinlan)\n\nManiac(quinlan) and forall x (Maniac(x) -> Clenched(x)) -> therefore Clenched(quinlan) Clenched(quinlan) and Clenched(quinlan) -> Chichi(quinlan) -> therefore Chichi(quinlan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The corly is unsmiling. If someone is glorified and pentagonal then they are not unsmiling. Nice, pyogenic people are not unsmiling. If someone is glorified and unsmiling then they are delicious. All unsmiling, glorified people are not pyogenic. If someone is pyogenic and unsmiling then they are pentagonal. If someone is unsmiling then they are pentagonal. If the corly is pentagonal then the corly is pyogenic. If someone is unsmiling and delicious then they are glorified. The corly is not pyogenic.", "logic": "\nUnsmiling(corly)\nforall x (Glorified(x) and Pentagonal(x) -> not Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Delicious(x) and Pyogenic(x) -> not Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) and Unsmiling(x) -> Delicious(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and Glorified(x) -> not Pyogenic(x))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and Unsmiling(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nPentagonal(corly) -> Pyogenic(corly)\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and Delicious(x) -> Glorified(x))\n\nnot Pyogenic(corly)\n\nUnsmiling(corly) and forall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Pentagonal(x)) -> therefore Pentagonal(corly) Pentagonal(corly) and Pentagonal(corly) -> Pyogenic(corly) -> therefore Pyogenic(corly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The annissa is colicky. If someone is corruptive and anaphoric then they are not colicky. Nice, dreaded people are not colicky. If someone is corruptive and colicky then they are ridiculous. All colicky, corruptive people are not dreaded. If someone is dreaded and colicky then they are anaphoric. If someone is colicky then they are anaphoric. If the annissa is anaphoric then the annissa is dreaded. If someone is colicky and ridiculous then they are corruptive. The annissa is not ridiculous.", "logic": "\nColicky(annissa)\nforall x (Corruptive(x) and Anaphoric(x) -> not Colicky(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) and Dreaded(x) -> not Colicky(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) and Colicky(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Colicky(x) and Corruptive(x) -> not Dreaded(x))\nforall x (Dreaded(x) and Colicky(x) -> Anaphoric(x))\nforall x (Colicky(x) -> Anaphoric(x))\nAnaphoric(annissa) -> Dreaded(annissa)\nforall x (Colicky(x) and Ridiculous(x) -> Corruptive(x))\n\nnot Ridiculous(annissa)\n\nforall x (Corruptive(x) and Colicky(x) -> Ridiculous(x)) <- forall x (Colicky(x) and Ridiculous(x) -> Corruptive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The nevin is unashamed. If someone is certified and fanatical then they are not unashamed. Nice, condylar people are not unashamed. If someone is certified and unashamed then they are trilobed. All unashamed, certified people are not condylar. If someone is condylar and unashamed then they are fanatical. If someone is unashamed then they are fanatical. If the nevin is fanatical then the nevin is condylar. If someone is unashamed and trilobed then they are certified. The nevin is certified.", "logic": "\nUnashamed(nevin)\nforall x (Certified(x) and Fanatical(x) -> not Unashamed(x))\nforall x (Trilobed(x) and Condylar(x) -> not Unashamed(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) and Unashamed(x) -> Trilobed(x))\nforall x (Unashamed(x) and Certified(x) -> not Condylar(x))\nforall x (Condylar(x) and Unashamed(x) -> Fanatical(x))\nforall x (Unashamed(x) -> Fanatical(x))\nFanatical(nevin) -> Condylar(nevin)\nforall x (Unashamed(x) and Trilobed(x) -> Certified(x))\n\nCertified(nevin)\n\nforall x (Unashamed(x) and Trilobed(x) -> Certified(x)) <- forall x (Certified(x) and Unashamed(x) -> Trilobed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The wilmar is extraneous. If someone is unexciting and capacious then they are not extraneous. Nice, allantoid people are not extraneous. If someone is unexciting and extraneous then they are beneficial. All extraneous, unexciting people are not allantoid. If someone is allantoid and extraneous then they are capacious. If someone is extraneous then they are capacious. If the wilmar is capacious then the wilmar is allantoid. If someone is extraneous and beneficial then they are unexciting. The wilmar does not see the wilmar.", "logic": "\nExtraneous(wilmar)\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and Capacious(x) -> not Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Beneficial(x) and Allantoid(x) -> not Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and Extraneous(x) -> Beneficial(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) and Unexciting(x) -> not Allantoid(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) and Extraneous(x) -> Capacious(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Capacious(x))\nCapacious(wilmar) -> Allantoid(wilmar)\nforall x (Extraneous(x) and Beneficial(x) -> Unexciting(x))\n\nnot Sees(wilmar, wilmar)\n\nnot Sees(wilmar, wilmar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "The denna is persisting. If someone is nisi and ornamental then they are not persisting. Nice, seaward people are not persisting. If someone is nisi and persisting then they are statant. All persisting, nisi people are not seaward. If someone is seaward and persisting then they are ornamental. If someone is persisting then they are ornamental. If the denna is ornamental then the denna is seaward. If someone is persisting and statant then they are nisi. The denna chases the denna.", "logic": "\nPersisting(denna)\nforall x (Nisi(x) and Ornamental(x) -> not Persisting(x))\nforall x (Statant(x) and Seaward(x) -> not Persisting(x))\nforall x (Nisi(x) and Persisting(x) -> Statant(x))\nforall x (Persisting(x) and Nisi(x) -> not Seaward(x))\nforall x (Seaward(x) and Persisting(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Persisting(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nOrnamental(denna) -> Seaward(denna)\nforall x (Persisting(x) and Statant(x) -> Nisi(x))\n\nChases(denna, denna)\n\nChases(denna, denna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1426"} {"premises": "Rosaleen is not alexic. Delphina is interlaced. Oralia is not aligned. Cold, outclassed things are not setaceous. If something is interlaced then it is outclassed. Oralia is not aligned.", "logic": "\nnot Alexic(rosaleen)\nInterlaced(delphina)\nnot Aligned(oralia)\nforall x (Alexic(x) and Outclassed(x) -> not Setaceous(x))\nforall x (Interlaced(x) -> Outclassed(x))\n\nnot Aligned(oralia)\n\ntherefore not Aligned(oralia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Loren is not backhanded. Brandy is nethermost. Margery is not sugarless. Cold, histologic things are not sibilant. If something is nethermost then it is histologic. Margery is sugarless.", "logic": "\nnot Backhanded(loren)\nNethermost(brandy)\nnot Sugarless(margery)\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Histologic(x) -> not Sibilant(x))\nforall x (Nethermost(x) -> Histologic(x))\n\nSugarless(margery)\n\ntherefore not Sugarless(margery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Amalita is not rumansh. Micaela is unshapely. Benedicta is not enlivening. Cold, prime things are not helpful. If something is unshapely then it is prime. Micaela is prime.", "logic": "\nnot Rumansh(amalita)\nUnshapely(micaela)\nnot Enlivening(benedicta)\nforall x (Rumansh(x) and Prime(x) -> not Helpful(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) -> Prime(x))\n\nPrime(micaela)\n\nUnshapely(micaela) and forall x (Unshapely(x) -> Prime(x)) -> therefore Prime(micaela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Glynis is not most. Rosa is random. Brigid is not fortuitous. Cold, laboured things are not eutherian. If something is random then it is laboured. Rosa is not laboured.", "logic": "\nnot Most(glynis)\nRandom(rosa)\nnot Fortuitous(brigid)\nforall x (Most(x) and Laboured(x) -> not Eutherian(x))\nforall x (Random(x) -> Laboured(x))\n\nnot Laboured(rosa)\n\nRandom(rosa) and forall x (Random(x) -> Laboured(x)) -> therefore Laboured(rosa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Caleb is not redeemable. Madelena is engrossed. Shelli is not blabby. Cold, andorran things are not climbable. If something is engrossed then it is andorran. Shelli is not andorran.", "logic": "\nnot Redeemable(caleb)\nEngrossed(madelena)\nnot Blabby(shelli)\nforall x (Redeemable(x) and Andorran(x) -> not Climbable(x))\nforall x (Engrossed(x) -> Andorran(x))\n\nnot Andorran(shelli)\n\nforall x (Engrossed(x) -> Andorran(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Dody is not addable. Wyn is dextrorsal. Willette is not surmounted. Cold, straining things are not farseeing. If something is dextrorsal then it is straining. Dody is straining.", "logic": "\nnot Addable(dody)\nDextrorsal(wyn)\nnot Surmounted(willette)\nforall x (Addable(x) and Straining(x) -> not Farseeing(x))\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) -> Straining(x))\n\nStraining(dody)\n\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) -> Straining(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Ramsey is not kindled. Flynn is mythical. Margot is not dioecious. Cold, spiny things are not scratchy. If something is mythical then it is spiny. Ramsey is not scratchy.", "logic": "\nnot Kindled(ramsey)\nMythical(flynn)\nnot Dioecious(margot)\nforall x (Kindled(x) and Spiny(x) -> not Scratchy(x))\nforall x (Mythical(x) -> Spiny(x))\n\nnot Scratchy(ramsey)\n\nnot Scratchy(ramsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Allie is not depletable. Celle is undigested. Way is not autacoidal. Cold, dendritic things are not amnic. If something is undigested then it is dendritic. Celle is depletable.", "logic": "\nnot Depletable(allie)\nUndigested(celle)\nnot Autacoidal(way)\nforall x (Depletable(x) and Dendritic(x) -> not Amnic(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> Dendritic(x))\n\nDepletable(celle)\n\nDepletable(celle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1166"} {"premises": "Earl is yogic. Earl is unmusical. Sophey is pucka. Sophey is not dental. Sophey is unmusical. Terrianne is yogic. Terrianne is pucka. Terrianne is piagetian. Joycelin is raising. Joycelin is unmusical. If someone is unmusical and not raising then they are not dental. All unmusical people are yogic. White people are not piagetian. If Joycelin is raising then Joycelin is dental. If someone is unmusical and not piagetian then they are pucka. If someone is piagetian and not dental then they are not immoveable. Terrianne is yogic.", "logic": "\nYogic(earl)\nUnmusical(earl)\nPucka(sophey)\nnot Dental(sophey)\nUnmusical(sophey)\nYogic(terrianne)\nPucka(terrianne)\nPiagetian(terrianne)\nRaising(joycelin)\nUnmusical(joycelin)\nforall x (Unmusical(x) and not Raising(x) -> not Dental(x))\nforall x (Unmusical(x) -> Yogic(x))\nforall x (Dental(x) -> not Piagetian(x))\nRaising(joycelin) -> Dental(joycelin)\nforall x (Unmusical(x) and not Piagetian(x) -> Pucka(x))\nforall x (Piagetian(x) and not Dental(x) -> not Immoveable(x))\n\nYogic(terrianne)\n\ntherefore Yogic(terrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Stesha is bourgeois. Stesha is acquirable. Analise is homophobic. Analise is not bustling. Analise is acquirable. Cherey is bourgeois. Cherey is homophobic. Cherey is mitigatory. Ravil is pubertal. Ravil is acquirable. If someone is acquirable and not pubertal then they are not bustling. All acquirable people are bourgeois. White people are not mitigatory. If Ravil is pubertal then Ravil is bustling. If someone is acquirable and not mitigatory then they are homophobic. If someone is mitigatory and not bustling then they are not trackable. Stesha is not acquirable.", "logic": "\nBourgeois(stesha)\nAcquirable(stesha)\nHomophobic(analise)\nnot Bustling(analise)\nAcquirable(analise)\nBourgeois(cherey)\nHomophobic(cherey)\nMitigatory(cherey)\nPubertal(ravil)\nAcquirable(ravil)\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and not Pubertal(x) -> not Bustling(x))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) -> Bourgeois(x))\nforall x (Bustling(x) -> not Mitigatory(x))\nPubertal(ravil) -> Bustling(ravil)\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and not Mitigatory(x) -> Homophobic(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and not Bustling(x) -> not Trackable(x))\n\nnot Acquirable(stesha)\n\ntherefore Acquirable(stesha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Anais is alienated. Anais is miry. Audy is cogged. Audy is not improvable. Audy is miry. Hedda is alienated. Hedda is cogged. Hedda is stationary. Slade is brisant. Slade is miry. If someone is miry and not brisant then they are not improvable. All miry people are alienated. White people are not stationary. If Slade is brisant then Slade is improvable. If someone is miry and not stationary then they are cogged. If someone is stationary and not improvable then they are not epenthetic. Audy is alienated.", "logic": "\nAlienated(anais)\nMiry(anais)\nCogged(audy)\nnot Improvable(audy)\nMiry(audy)\nAlienated(hedda)\nCogged(hedda)\nStationary(hedda)\nBrisant(slade)\nMiry(slade)\nforall x (Miry(x) and not Brisant(x) -> not Improvable(x))\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Improvable(x) -> not Stationary(x))\nBrisant(slade) -> Improvable(slade)\nforall x (Miry(x) and not Stationary(x) -> Cogged(x))\nforall x (Stationary(x) and not Improvable(x) -> not Epenthetic(x))\n\nAlienated(audy)\n\nMiry(audy) and forall x (Miry(x) -> Alienated(x)) -> therefore Alienated(audy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Phineas is alleged. Phineas is unshapen. Nickie is untired. Nickie is not sticking. Nickie is unshapen. Norry is alleged. Norry is untired. Norry is comely. Rodie is inbred. Rodie is unshapen. If someone is unshapen and not inbred then they are not sticking. All unshapen people are alleged. White people are not comely. If Rodie is inbred then Rodie is sticking. If someone is unshapen and not comely then they are untired. If someone is comely and not sticking then they are not cheering. Rodie is not sticking.", "logic": "\nAlleged(phineas)\nUnshapen(phineas)\nUntired(nickie)\nnot Sticking(nickie)\nUnshapen(nickie)\nAlleged(norry)\nUntired(norry)\nComely(norry)\nInbred(rodie)\nUnshapen(rodie)\nforall x (Unshapen(x) and not Inbred(x) -> not Sticking(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Alleged(x))\nforall x (Sticking(x) -> not Comely(x))\nInbred(rodie) -> Sticking(rodie)\nforall x (Unshapen(x) and not Comely(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Comely(x) and not Sticking(x) -> not Cheering(x))\n\nnot Sticking(rodie)\n\nInbred(rodie) and Inbred(rodie) -> Sticking(rodie) -> therefore Sticking(rodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Ricardo is tenebrious. Ricardo is psychotic. Rolfe is halal. Rolfe is not bibless. Rolfe is psychotic. Fancy is tenebrious. Fancy is halal. Fancy is glottal. Christy is boon. Christy is psychotic. If someone is psychotic and not boon then they are not bibless. All psychotic people are tenebrious. White people are not glottal. If Christy is boon then Christy is bibless. If someone is psychotic and not glottal then they are halal. If someone is glottal and not bibless then they are not carroty. Christy is not glottal.", "logic": "\nTenebrious(ricardo)\nPsychotic(ricardo)\nHalal(rolfe)\nnot Bibless(rolfe)\nPsychotic(rolfe)\nTenebrious(fancy)\nHalal(fancy)\nGlottal(fancy)\nBoon(christy)\nPsychotic(christy)\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and not Boon(x) -> not Bibless(x))\nforall x (Psychotic(x) -> Tenebrious(x))\nforall x (Bibless(x) -> not Glottal(x))\nBoon(christy) -> Bibless(christy)\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and not Glottal(x) -> Halal(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) and not Bibless(x) -> not Carroty(x))\n\nnot Glottal(christy)\n\nBoon(christy) and Boon(christy) -> Bibless(christy) -> therefore Bibless(christy) Bibless(christy) and forall x (Bibless(x) -> not Glottal(x)) -> therefore not Glottal(christy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Felita is cercarial. Felita is sneering. Piggy is pyretic. Piggy is not cancerous. Piggy is sneering. Andie is cercarial. Andie is pyretic. Andie is indentured. Zorana is unhumorous. Zorana is sneering. If someone is sneering and not unhumorous then they are not cancerous. All sneering people are cercarial. White people are not indentured. If Zorana is unhumorous then Zorana is cancerous. If someone is sneering and not indentured then they are pyretic. If someone is indentured and not cancerous then they are not unkind. Zorana is indentured.", "logic": "\nCercarial(felita)\nSneering(felita)\nPyretic(piggy)\nnot Cancerous(piggy)\nSneering(piggy)\nCercarial(andie)\nPyretic(andie)\nIndentured(andie)\nUnhumorous(zorana)\nSneering(zorana)\nforall x (Sneering(x) and not Unhumorous(x) -> not Cancerous(x))\nforall x (Sneering(x) -> Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> not Indentured(x))\nUnhumorous(zorana) -> Cancerous(zorana)\nforall x (Sneering(x) and not Indentured(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Indentured(x) and not Cancerous(x) -> not Unkind(x))\n\nIndentured(zorana)\n\nUnhumorous(zorana) and Unhumorous(zorana) -> Cancerous(zorana) -> therefore Cancerous(zorana) Cancerous(zorana) and forall x (Cancerous(x) -> not Indentured(x)) -> therefore not Indentured(zorana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Jania is concerted. Jania is nihilistic. Philippe is tending. Philippe is not moral. Philippe is nihilistic. Charil is concerted. Charil is tending. Charil is gushy. Kandy is fourfold. Kandy is nihilistic. If someone is nihilistic and not fourfold then they are not moral. All nihilistic people are concerted. White people are not gushy. If Kandy is fourfold then Kandy is moral. If someone is nihilistic and not gushy then they are tending. If someone is gushy and not moral then they are not wobbly. Kandy is tending.", "logic": "\nConcerted(jania)\nNihilistic(jania)\nTending(philippe)\nnot Moral(philippe)\nNihilistic(philippe)\nConcerted(charil)\nTending(charil)\nGushy(charil)\nFourfold(kandy)\nNihilistic(kandy)\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) and not Fourfold(x) -> not Moral(x))\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Moral(x) -> not Gushy(x))\nFourfold(kandy) -> Moral(kandy)\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) and not Gushy(x) -> Tending(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) and not Moral(x) -> not Wobbly(x))\n\nTending(kandy)\n\nFourfold(kandy) and Fourfold(kandy) -> Moral(kandy) -> therefore Moral(kandy) Moral(kandy) and forall x (Moral(x) -> not Gushy(x)) -> therefore not Gushy(kandy) Nihilistic(kandy) and not Gushy(kandy) and forall x (Nihilistic(x) and not Gushy(x) -> Tending(x)) -> therefore Tending(kandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Sunshine is parallel. Sunshine is nonliteral. Rachele is defensive. Rachele is not phantom. Rachele is nonliteral. Wilson is parallel. Wilson is defensive. Wilson is lissome. Kellen is credited. Kellen is nonliteral. If someone is nonliteral and not credited then they are not phantom. All nonliteral people are parallel. White people are not lissome. If Kellen is credited then Kellen is phantom. If someone is nonliteral and not lissome then they are defensive. If someone is lissome and not phantom then they are not threadlike. Kellen is not defensive.", "logic": "\nParallel(sunshine)\nNonliteral(sunshine)\nDefensive(rachele)\nnot Phantom(rachele)\nNonliteral(rachele)\nParallel(wilson)\nDefensive(wilson)\nLissome(wilson)\nCredited(kellen)\nNonliteral(kellen)\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) and not Credited(x) -> not Phantom(x))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Parallel(x))\nforall x (Phantom(x) -> not Lissome(x))\nCredited(kellen) -> Phantom(kellen)\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) and not Lissome(x) -> Defensive(x))\nforall x (Lissome(x) and not Phantom(x) -> not Threadlike(x))\n\nnot Defensive(kellen)\n\nCredited(kellen) and Credited(kellen) -> Phantom(kellen) -> therefore Phantom(kellen) Phantom(kellen) and forall x (Phantom(x) -> not Lissome(x)) -> therefore not Lissome(kellen) Nonliteral(kellen) and not Lissome(kellen) and forall x (Nonliteral(x) and not Lissome(x) -> Defensive(x)) -> therefore Defensive(kellen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Win is empyrean. Win is soled. Celesta is ambulatory. Celesta is not back. Celesta is soled. Winton is empyrean. Winton is ambulatory. Winton is pedagogic. Jillane is sottish. Jillane is soled. If someone is soled and not sottish then they are not back. All soled people are empyrean. White people are not pedagogic. If Jillane is sottish then Jillane is back. If someone is soled and not pedagogic then they are ambulatory. If someone is pedagogic and not back then they are not phantom. Win is not ambulatory.", "logic": "\nEmpyrean(win)\nSoled(win)\nAmbulatory(celesta)\nnot Back(celesta)\nSoled(celesta)\nEmpyrean(winton)\nAmbulatory(winton)\nPedagogic(winton)\nSottish(jillane)\nSoled(jillane)\nforall x (Soled(x) and not Sottish(x) -> not Back(x))\nforall x (Soled(x) -> Empyrean(x))\nforall x (Back(x) -> not Pedagogic(x))\nSottish(jillane) -> Back(jillane)\nforall x (Soled(x) and not Pedagogic(x) -> Ambulatory(x))\nforall x (Pedagogic(x) and not Back(x) -> not Phantom(x))\n\nnot Ambulatory(win)\n\nforall x (Soled(x) and not Pedagogic(x) -> Ambulatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Emelia is hydric. Emelia is untested. Nilson is glum. Nilson is not unspecific. Nilson is untested. Bailie is hydric. Bailie is glum. Bailie is yuman. Lizette is farseeing. Lizette is untested. If someone is untested and not farseeing then they are not unspecific. All untested people are hydric. White people are not yuman. If Lizette is farseeing then Lizette is unspecific. If someone is untested and not yuman then they are glum. If someone is yuman and not unspecific then they are not dozen. Emelia is unspecific.", "logic": "\nHydric(emelia)\nUntested(emelia)\nGlum(nilson)\nnot Unspecific(nilson)\nUntested(nilson)\nHydric(bailie)\nGlum(bailie)\nYuman(bailie)\nFarseeing(lizette)\nUntested(lizette)\nforall x (Untested(x) and not Farseeing(x) -> not Unspecific(x))\nforall x (Untested(x) -> Hydric(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) -> not Yuman(x))\nFarseeing(lizette) -> Unspecific(lizette)\nforall x (Untested(x) and not Yuman(x) -> Glum(x))\nforall x (Yuman(x) and not Unspecific(x) -> not Dozen(x))\n\nUnspecific(emelia)\n\nUnspecific(emelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Prunella is brotherly. Prunella is illusional. Talbert is funky. Talbert is not calibrated. Talbert is illusional. Brian is brotherly. Brian is funky. Brian is rayless. Jaquelyn is paradisal. Jaquelyn is illusional. If someone is illusional and not paradisal then they are not calibrated. All illusional people are brotherly. White people are not rayless. If Jaquelyn is paradisal then Jaquelyn is calibrated. If someone is illusional and not rayless then they are funky. If someone is rayless and not calibrated then they are not axile. Brian is not axile.", "logic": "\nBrotherly(prunella)\nIllusional(prunella)\nFunky(talbert)\nnot Calibrated(talbert)\nIllusional(talbert)\nBrotherly(brian)\nFunky(brian)\nRayless(brian)\nParadisal(jaquelyn)\nIllusional(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Illusional(x) and not Paradisal(x) -> not Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Illusional(x) -> Brotherly(x))\nforall x (Calibrated(x) -> not Rayless(x))\nParadisal(jaquelyn) -> Calibrated(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Illusional(x) and not Rayless(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Rayless(x) and not Calibrated(x) -> not Axile(x))\n\nnot Axile(brian)\n\nnot Axile(brian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Jocelyne is authorised. Jocelyne is glaring. Rollins is sandy. Rollins is not dowdy. Rollins is glaring. Rosalinde is authorised. Rosalinde is sandy. Rosalinde is insistent. Winston is maledict. Winston is glaring. If someone is glaring and not maledict then they are not dowdy. All glaring people are authorised. White people are not insistent. If Winston is maledict then Winston is dowdy. If someone is glaring and not insistent then they are sandy. If someone is insistent and not dowdy then they are not aural. Rosalinde is glaring.", "logic": "\nAuthorised(jocelyne)\nGlaring(jocelyne)\nSandy(rollins)\nnot Dowdy(rollins)\nGlaring(rollins)\nAuthorised(rosalinde)\nSandy(rosalinde)\nInsistent(rosalinde)\nMaledict(winston)\nGlaring(winston)\nforall x (Glaring(x) and not Maledict(x) -> not Dowdy(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) -> Authorised(x))\nforall x (Dowdy(x) -> not Insistent(x))\nMaledict(winston) -> Dowdy(winston)\nforall x (Glaring(x) and not Insistent(x) -> Sandy(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) and not Dowdy(x) -> not Aural(x))\n\nGlaring(rosalinde)\n\nGlaring(rosalinde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Cheri is gelid. Cheri is pathless. Adi is avertable. Adi is not pecuniary. Adi is pathless. Luana is gelid. Luana is avertable. Luana is feverish. Ferdinand is bogus. Ferdinand is pathless. If someone is pathless and not bogus then they are not pecuniary. All pathless people are gelid. White people are not feverish. If Ferdinand is bogus then Ferdinand is pecuniary. If someone is pathless and not feverish then they are avertable. If someone is feverish and not pecuniary then they are not blubbery. Adi is not bogus.", "logic": "\nGelid(cheri)\nPathless(cheri)\nAvertable(adi)\nnot Pecuniary(adi)\nPathless(adi)\nGelid(luana)\nAvertable(luana)\nFeverish(luana)\nBogus(ferdinand)\nPathless(ferdinand)\nforall x (Pathless(x) and not Bogus(x) -> not Pecuniary(x))\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Pecuniary(x) -> not Feverish(x))\nBogus(ferdinand) -> Pecuniary(ferdinand)\nforall x (Pathless(x) and not Feverish(x) -> Avertable(x))\nforall x (Feverish(x) and not Pecuniary(x) -> not Blubbery(x))\n\nnot Bogus(adi)\n\nnot Bogus(adi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Mala is secondhand. Mala is committed. Jerrilee is antinomian. Jerrilee is not centrical. Jerrilee is committed. Gwennie is secondhand. Gwennie is antinomian. Gwennie is mediated. Edee is burdenless. Edee is committed. If someone is committed and not burdenless then they are not centrical. All committed people are secondhand. White people are not mediated. If Edee is burdenless then Edee is centrical. If someone is committed and not mediated then they are antinomian. If someone is mediated and not centrical then they are not blase. Gwennie is burdenless.", "logic": "\nSecondhand(mala)\nCommitted(mala)\nAntinomian(jerrilee)\nnot Centrical(jerrilee)\nCommitted(jerrilee)\nSecondhand(gwennie)\nAntinomian(gwennie)\nMediated(gwennie)\nBurdenless(edee)\nCommitted(edee)\nforall x (Committed(x) and not Burdenless(x) -> not Centrical(x))\nforall x (Committed(x) -> Secondhand(x))\nforall x (Centrical(x) -> not Mediated(x))\nBurdenless(edee) -> Centrical(edee)\nforall x (Committed(x) and not Mediated(x) -> Antinomian(x))\nforall x (Mediated(x) and not Centrical(x) -> not Blase(x))\n\nBurdenless(gwennie)\n\nBurdenless(gwennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Herschel is homosexual. Herschel is cortical. Karie is synchronic. Karie is not sacked. Karie is cortical. Syd is homosexual. Syd is synchronic. Syd is ninepenny. Renata is cylindric. Renata is cortical. If someone is cortical and not cylindric then they are not sacked. All cortical people are homosexual. White people are not ninepenny. If Renata is cylindric then Renata is sacked. If someone is cortical and not ninepenny then they are synchronic. If someone is ninepenny and not sacked then they are not languid. Syd is not sacked.", "logic": "\nHomosexual(herschel)\nCortical(herschel)\nSynchronic(karie)\nnot Sacked(karie)\nCortical(karie)\nHomosexual(syd)\nSynchronic(syd)\nNinepenny(syd)\nCylindric(renata)\nCortical(renata)\nforall x (Cortical(x) and not Cylindric(x) -> not Sacked(x))\nforall x (Cortical(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Sacked(x) -> not Ninepenny(x))\nCylindric(renata) -> Sacked(renata)\nforall x (Cortical(x) and not Ninepenny(x) -> Synchronic(x))\nforall x (Ninepenny(x) and not Sacked(x) -> not Languid(x))\n\nnot Sacked(syd)\n\nnot Sacked(syd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Robby is moonlike. Robby is ratified. Jacquette is abounding. Jacquette is not untaught. Jacquette is ratified. Myrta is moonlike. Myrta is abounding. Myrta is idealistic. Bambie is ponderable. Bambie is ratified. If someone is ratified and not ponderable then they are not untaught. All ratified people are moonlike. White people are not idealistic. If Bambie is ponderable then Bambie is untaught. If someone is ratified and not idealistic then they are abounding. If someone is idealistic and not untaught then they are not slaty. Bambie is slaty.", "logic": "\nMoonlike(robby)\nRatified(robby)\nAbounding(jacquette)\nnot Untaught(jacquette)\nRatified(jacquette)\nMoonlike(myrta)\nAbounding(myrta)\nIdealistic(myrta)\nPonderable(bambie)\nRatified(bambie)\nforall x (Ratified(x) and not Ponderable(x) -> not Untaught(x))\nforall x (Ratified(x) -> Moonlike(x))\nforall x (Untaught(x) -> not Idealistic(x))\nPonderable(bambie) -> Untaught(bambie)\nforall x (Ratified(x) and not Idealistic(x) -> Abounding(x))\nforall x (Idealistic(x) and not Untaught(x) -> not Slaty(x))\n\nSlaty(bambie)\n\nSlaty(bambie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-145"} {"premises": "Meggie is venezuelan. Joann is unseeded. Shanda is pursy. Nice, intrusive people are biform. Red, biform people are convolute. If someone is unseeded then they are convolute. If someone is convolute then they are venezuelan. If someone is biform then they are venezuelan. All venezuelan people are not intrusive. If someone is biform then they are pursy. Young, intrusive people are unseeded. Meggie is venezuelan.", "logic": "\nVenezuelan(meggie)\nUnseeded(joann)\nPursy(shanda)\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and Intrusive(x) -> Biform(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Biform(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Unseeded(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Venezuelan(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Venezuelan(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) -> not Intrusive(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Pursy(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) and Intrusive(x) -> Unseeded(x))\n\nVenezuelan(meggie)\n\ntherefore Venezuelan(meggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Debby is untellable. Wain is cheerless. Robinett is heroical. Nice, earthen people are scrupulous. Red, scrupulous people are embryotic. If someone is cheerless then they are embryotic. If someone is embryotic then they are untellable. If someone is scrupulous then they are untellable. All untellable people are not earthen. If someone is scrupulous then they are heroical. Young, earthen people are cheerless. Robinett is not heroical.", "logic": "\nUntellable(debby)\nCheerless(wain)\nHeroical(robinett)\nforall x (Untellable(x) and Earthen(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Horrific(x) and Scrupulous(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Cheerless(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> not Earthen(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Heroical(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Earthen(x) -> Cheerless(x))\n\nnot Heroical(robinett)\n\ntherefore Heroical(robinett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Westbrook is malarial. Kara is liplike. Starr is camphoric. Nice, chance people are childish. Red, childish people are pomaded. If someone is liplike then they are pomaded. If someone is pomaded then they are malarial. If someone is childish then they are malarial. All malarial people are not chance. If someone is childish then they are camphoric. Young, chance people are liplike. Westbrook is not chance.", "logic": "\nMalarial(westbrook)\nLiplike(kara)\nCamphoric(starr)\nforall x (Malarial(x) and Chance(x) -> Childish(x))\nforall x (Glacial(x) and Childish(x) -> Pomaded(x))\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Pomaded(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) -> not Chance(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) and Chance(x) -> Liplike(x))\n\nnot Chance(westbrook)\n\nMalarial(westbrook) and forall x (Malarial(x) -> not Chance(x)) -> therefore not Chance(westbrook)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Stanly is unlisted. Don is brazen. Judy is clanging. Nice, trenchant people are unsalable. Red, unsalable people are kittenish. If someone is brazen then they are kittenish. If someone is kittenish then they are unlisted. If someone is unsalable then they are unlisted. All unlisted people are not trenchant. If someone is unsalable then they are clanging. Young, trenchant people are brazen. Stanly is trenchant.", "logic": "\nUnlisted(stanly)\nBrazen(don)\nClanging(judy)\nforall x (Unlisted(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Unsalable(x))\nforall x (Revised(x) and Unsalable(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Kittenish(x) -> Unlisted(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Unlisted(x))\nforall x (Unlisted(x) -> not Trenchant(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Clanging(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Brazen(x))\n\nTrenchant(stanly)\n\nUnlisted(stanly) and forall x (Unlisted(x) -> not Trenchant(x)) -> therefore not Trenchant(stanly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Nan is monotonous. Wallache is gabby. Henka is unblended. Nice, unfirm people are vaporous. Red, vaporous people are oratorical. If someone is gabby then they are oratorical. If someone is oratorical then they are monotonous. If someone is vaporous then they are monotonous. All monotonous people are not unfirm. If someone is vaporous then they are unblended. Young, unfirm people are gabby. Wallache is monotonous.", "logic": "\nMonotonous(nan)\nGabby(wallache)\nUnblended(henka)\nforall x (Monotonous(x) and Unfirm(x) -> Vaporous(x))\nforall x (Behavioral(x) and Vaporous(x) -> Oratorical(x))\nforall x (Gabby(x) -> Oratorical(x))\nforall x (Oratorical(x) -> Monotonous(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Monotonous(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) -> not Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Unblended(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) and Unfirm(x) -> Gabby(x))\n\nMonotonous(wallache)\n\nGabby(wallache) and forall x (Gabby(x) -> Oratorical(x)) -> therefore Oratorical(wallache) Oratorical(wallache) and forall x (Oratorical(x) -> Monotonous(x)) -> therefore Monotonous(wallache)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Sherwynd is numerable. Brianne is embodied. Chaunce is anabolic. Nice, doting people are acinar. Red, acinar people are chelonian. If someone is embodied then they are chelonian. If someone is chelonian then they are numerable. If someone is acinar then they are numerable. All numerable people are not doting. If someone is acinar then they are anabolic. Young, doting people are embodied. Brianne is not numerable.", "logic": "\nNumerable(sherwynd)\nEmbodied(brianne)\nAnabolic(chaunce)\nforall x (Numerable(x) and Doting(x) -> Acinar(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) and Acinar(x) -> Chelonian(x))\nforall x (Embodied(x) -> Chelonian(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Acinar(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Numerable(x) -> not Doting(x))\nforall x (Acinar(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Acinar(x) and Doting(x) -> Embodied(x))\n\nnot Numerable(brianne)\n\nEmbodied(brianne) and forall x (Embodied(x) -> Chelonian(x)) -> therefore Chelonian(brianne) Chelonian(brianne) and forall x (Chelonian(x) -> Numerable(x)) -> therefore Numerable(brianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Merwin is arthralgic. Bobby is petrifying. Milli is amerindic. Nice, alterable people are hemophilic. Red, hemophilic people are insatiate. If someone is petrifying then they are insatiate. If someone is insatiate then they are arthralgic. If someone is hemophilic then they are arthralgic. All arthralgic people are not alterable. If someone is hemophilic then they are amerindic. Young, alterable people are petrifying. Bobby is not alterable.", "logic": "\nArthralgic(merwin)\nPetrifying(bobby)\nAmerindic(milli)\nforall x (Arthralgic(x) and Alterable(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Manly(x) and Hemophilic(x) -> Insatiate(x))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) -> Insatiate(x))\nforall x (Insatiate(x) -> Arthralgic(x))\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) -> Arthralgic(x))\nforall x (Arthralgic(x) -> not Alterable(x))\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) -> Amerindic(x))\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) and Alterable(x) -> Petrifying(x))\n\nnot Alterable(bobby)\n\nPetrifying(bobby) and forall x (Petrifying(x) -> Insatiate(x)) -> therefore Insatiate(bobby) Insatiate(bobby) and forall x (Insatiate(x) -> Arthralgic(x)) -> therefore Arthralgic(bobby) Arthralgic(bobby) and forall x (Arthralgic(x) -> not Alterable(x)) -> therefore not Alterable(bobby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Engelbert is tiddly. Tadd is biomedical. Monte is titled. Nice, bunchy people are cavernous. Red, cavernous people are xlvii. If someone is biomedical then they are xlvii. If someone is xlvii then they are tiddly. If someone is cavernous then they are tiddly. All tiddly people are not bunchy. If someone is cavernous then they are titled. Young, bunchy people are biomedical. Tadd is bunchy.", "logic": "\nTiddly(engelbert)\nBiomedical(tadd)\nTitled(monte)\nforall x (Tiddly(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Cavernous(x))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Cavernous(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Biomedical(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Tiddly(x) -> not Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) -> Titled(x))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Biomedical(x))\n\nBunchy(tadd)\n\nBiomedical(tadd) and forall x (Biomedical(x) -> Xlvii(x)) -> therefore Xlvii(tadd) Xlvii(tadd) and forall x (Xlvii(x) -> Tiddly(x)) -> therefore Tiddly(tadd) Tiddly(tadd) and forall x (Tiddly(x) -> not Bunchy(x)) -> therefore not Bunchy(tadd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Jimbo is clxx. Luce is pederastic. Coreen is chatoyant. Nice, triple people are gleeful. Red, gleeful people are annexal. If someone is pederastic then they are annexal. If someone is annexal then they are clxx. If someone is gleeful then they are clxx. All clxx people are not triple. If someone is gleeful then they are chatoyant. Young, triple people are pederastic. Coreen is not annexal.", "logic": "\nClxx(jimbo)\nPederastic(luce)\nChatoyant(coreen)\nforall x (Clxx(x) and Triple(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Gleeful(x) -> Annexal(x))\nforall x (Pederastic(x) -> Annexal(x))\nforall x (Annexal(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> not Triple(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Chatoyant(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) and Triple(x) -> Pederastic(x))\n\nnot Annexal(coreen)\n\nforall x (Pederastic(x) -> Annexal(x)) <- forall x (Gleeful(x) and Triple(x) -> Pederastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Lura is tillable. Estele is unasked. Felicity is evacuant. Nice, collegial people are comical. Red, comical people are amicable. If someone is unasked then they are amicable. If someone is amicable then they are tillable. If someone is comical then they are tillable. All tillable people are not collegial. If someone is comical then they are evacuant. Young, collegial people are unasked. Lura is evacuant.", "logic": "\nTillable(lura)\nUnasked(estele)\nEvacuant(felicity)\nforall x (Tillable(x) and Collegial(x) -> Comical(x))\nforall x (Stark(x) and Comical(x) -> Amicable(x))\nforall x (Unasked(x) -> Amicable(x))\nforall x (Amicable(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Comical(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Tillable(x) -> not Collegial(x))\nforall x (Comical(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Comical(x) and Collegial(x) -> Unasked(x))\n\nEvacuant(lura)\n\nforall x (Comical(x) -> Evacuant(x)) <- forall x (Tillable(x) and Collegial(x) -> Comical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Phylys is erstwhile. Anetta is indecent. Karlee is rich. Nice, waking people are slaveless. Red, slaveless people are boolean. If someone is indecent then they are boolean. If someone is boolean then they are erstwhile. If someone is slaveless then they are erstwhile. All erstwhile people are not waking. If someone is slaveless then they are rich. Young, waking people are indecent. Phylys is not indecent.", "logic": "\nErstwhile(phylys)\nIndecent(anetta)\nRich(karlee)\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) and Waking(x) -> Slaveless(x))\nforall x (Sounding(x) and Slaveless(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Indecent(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Boolean(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Slaveless(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> not Waking(x))\nforall x (Slaveless(x) -> Rich(x))\nforall x (Slaveless(x) and Waking(x) -> Indecent(x))\n\nnot Indecent(phylys)\n\nforall x (Slaveless(x) and Waking(x) -> Indecent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Oscar is permanent. Yvette is pleasing. Alphonse is chagrined. Nice, rapturous people are incensed. Red, incensed people are outrigged. If someone is pleasing then they are outrigged. If someone is outrigged then they are permanent. If someone is incensed then they are permanent. All permanent people are not rapturous. If someone is incensed then they are chagrined. Young, rapturous people are pleasing. Oscar is incensed.", "logic": "\nPermanent(oscar)\nPleasing(yvette)\nChagrined(alphonse)\nforall x (Permanent(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Incensed(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) and Incensed(x) -> Outrigged(x))\nforall x (Pleasing(x) -> Outrigged(x))\nforall x (Outrigged(x) -> Permanent(x))\nforall x (Incensed(x) -> Permanent(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> not Rapturous(x))\nforall x (Incensed(x) -> Chagrined(x))\nforall x (Incensed(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Pleasing(x))\n\nIncensed(oscar)\n\nforall x (Permanent(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Incensed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Easter is receivable. Lavena is cogitative. Vanessa is parous. Nice, recluse people are folding. Red, folding people are synoicous. If someone is cogitative then they are synoicous. If someone is synoicous then they are receivable. If someone is folding then they are receivable. All receivable people are not recluse. If someone is folding then they are parous. Young, recluse people are cogitative. Easter is not perceptive.", "logic": "\nReceivable(easter)\nCogitative(lavena)\nParous(vanessa)\nforall x (Receivable(x) and Recluse(x) -> Folding(x))\nforall x (Perceptive(x) and Folding(x) -> Synoicous(x))\nforall x (Cogitative(x) -> Synoicous(x))\nforall x (Synoicous(x) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Receivable(x) -> not Recluse(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Parous(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) and Recluse(x) -> Cogitative(x))\n\nnot Perceptive(easter)\n\nnot Perceptive(easter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Flo is artless. Glenn is bald. Leda is slapdash. Nice, moved people are sixpenny. Red, sixpenny people are charged. If someone is bald then they are charged. If someone is charged then they are artless. If someone is sixpenny then they are artless. All artless people are not moved. If someone is sixpenny then they are slapdash. Young, moved people are bald. Glenn is uncrowned.", "logic": "\nArtless(flo)\nBald(glenn)\nSlapdash(leda)\nforall x (Artless(x) and Moved(x) -> Sixpenny(x))\nforall x (Uncrowned(x) and Sixpenny(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Artless(x))\nforall x (Sixpenny(x) -> Artless(x))\nforall x (Artless(x) -> not Moved(x))\nforall x (Sixpenny(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Sixpenny(x) and Moved(x) -> Bald(x))\n\nUncrowned(glenn)\n\nUncrowned(glenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Kellie is hebdomadal. Laurie is stimulated. Zenia is under. Nice, encircling people are grubby. Red, grubby people are vitreous. If someone is stimulated then they are vitreous. If someone is vitreous then they are hebdomadal. If someone is grubby then they are hebdomadal. All hebdomadal people are not encircling. If someone is grubby then they are under. Young, encircling people are stimulated. Zenia is not uninvited.", "logic": "\nHebdomadal(kellie)\nStimulated(laurie)\nUnder(zenia)\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Encircling(x) -> Grubby(x))\nforall x (Uninvited(x) and Grubby(x) -> Vitreous(x))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) -> Vitreous(x))\nforall x (Vitreous(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Grubby(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> not Encircling(x))\nforall x (Grubby(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Grubby(x) and Encircling(x) -> Stimulated(x))\n\nnot Uninvited(zenia)\n\nnot Uninvited(zenia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Shoshana is mellow. Arlene is chatoyant. Johnette is fond. Nice, casuistic people are unrested. Red, unrested people are dizzy. If someone is chatoyant then they are dizzy. If someone is dizzy then they are mellow. If someone is unrested then they are mellow. All mellow people are not casuistic. If someone is unrested then they are fond. Young, casuistic people are chatoyant. Johnette is casuistic.", "logic": "\nMellow(shoshana)\nChatoyant(arlene)\nFond(johnette)\nforall x (Mellow(x) and Casuistic(x) -> Unrested(x))\nforall x (Triploid(x) and Unrested(x) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Chatoyant(x) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Dizzy(x) -> Mellow(x))\nforall x (Unrested(x) -> Mellow(x))\nforall x (Mellow(x) -> not Casuistic(x))\nforall x (Unrested(x) -> Fond(x))\nforall x (Unrested(x) and Casuistic(x) -> Chatoyant(x))\n\nCasuistic(johnette)\n\nCasuistic(johnette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-763"} {"premises": "Goldarina is exportable. Goldarina is rockbound. Goldarina is rhapsodic. Tamiko is exportable. Tamiko is rockbound. Tamiko is higher. Tamiko is partial. Elizabet is bathetic. Elizabet is partial. Savina is exportable. Savina is bathetic. Savina is rockbound. Savina is rhapsodic. Savina is partial. Savina is visible. If Elizabet is partial then Elizabet is higher. All rhapsodic things are visible. All exportable, rhapsodic things are higher. Young, rockbound things are bathetic. All partial, higher things are rockbound. All partial things are bathetic. All partial, rockbound things are exportable. Quiet things are higher. Savina is rhapsodic.", "logic": "\nExportable(goldarina)\nRockbound(goldarina)\nRhapsodic(goldarina)\nExportable(tamiko)\nRockbound(tamiko)\nHigher(tamiko)\nPartial(tamiko)\nBathetic(elizabet)\nPartial(elizabet)\nExportable(savina)\nBathetic(savina)\nRockbound(savina)\nRhapsodic(savina)\nPartial(savina)\nVisible(savina)\nPartial(elizabet) -> Higher(elizabet)\nforall x (Rhapsodic(x) -> Visible(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) and Rhapsodic(x) -> Higher(x))\nforall x (Visible(x) and Rockbound(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Partial(x) and Higher(x) -> Rockbound(x))\nforall x (Partial(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Partial(x) and Rockbound(x) -> Exportable(x))\nforall x (Rhapsodic(x) -> Higher(x))\n\nRhapsodic(savina)\n\ntherefore Rhapsodic(savina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Lemuel is agonising. Lemuel is neighborly. Lemuel is branchy. Haven is agonising. Haven is neighborly. Haven is filar. Haven is pejorative. Johnna is rodlike. Johnna is pejorative. Emmye is agonising. Emmye is rodlike. Emmye is neighborly. Emmye is branchy. Emmye is pejorative. Emmye is simplified. If Johnna is pejorative then Johnna is filar. All branchy things are simplified. All agonising, branchy things are filar. Young, neighborly things are rodlike. All pejorative, filar things are neighborly. All pejorative things are rodlike. All pejorative, neighborly things are agonising. Quiet things are filar. Haven is not pejorative.", "logic": "\nAgonising(lemuel)\nNeighborly(lemuel)\nBranchy(lemuel)\nAgonising(haven)\nNeighborly(haven)\nFilar(haven)\nPejorative(haven)\nRodlike(johnna)\nPejorative(johnna)\nAgonising(emmye)\nRodlike(emmye)\nNeighborly(emmye)\nBranchy(emmye)\nPejorative(emmye)\nSimplified(emmye)\nPejorative(johnna) -> Filar(johnna)\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Simplified(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) and Branchy(x) -> Filar(x))\nforall x (Simplified(x) and Neighborly(x) -> Rodlike(x))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) and Filar(x) -> Neighborly(x))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) -> Rodlike(x))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) and Neighborly(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Filar(x))\n\nnot Pejorative(haven)\n\ntherefore Pejorative(haven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Janella is stockinged. Janella is binding. Janella is bandaged. Thomasin is stockinged. Thomasin is binding. Thomasin is littered. Thomasin is noxious. Mella is unwell. Mella is noxious. Annalee is stockinged. Annalee is unwell. Annalee is binding. Annalee is bandaged. Annalee is noxious. Annalee is peculiar. If Mella is noxious then Mella is littered. All bandaged things are peculiar. All stockinged, bandaged things are littered. Young, binding things are unwell. All noxious, littered things are binding. All noxious things are unwell. All noxious, binding things are stockinged. Quiet things are littered. Thomasin is unwell.", "logic": "\nStockinged(janella)\nBinding(janella)\nBandaged(janella)\nStockinged(thomasin)\nBinding(thomasin)\nLittered(thomasin)\nNoxious(thomasin)\nUnwell(mella)\nNoxious(mella)\nStockinged(annalee)\nUnwell(annalee)\nBinding(annalee)\nBandaged(annalee)\nNoxious(annalee)\nPeculiar(annalee)\nNoxious(mella) -> Littered(mella)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Peculiar(x))\nforall x (Stockinged(x) and Bandaged(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) and Binding(x) -> Unwell(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) and Littered(x) -> Binding(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Unwell(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) and Binding(x) -> Stockinged(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Littered(x))\n\nUnwell(thomasin)\n\nNoxious(thomasin) and forall x (Noxious(x) -> Unwell(x)) -> therefore Unwell(thomasin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Carrissa is unshod. Carrissa is gifted. Carrissa is detected. Pietro is unshod. Pietro is gifted. Pietro is limited. Pietro is elongate. Giselle is syncarpous. Giselle is elongate. Hashim is unshod. Hashim is syncarpous. Hashim is gifted. Hashim is detected. Hashim is elongate. Hashim is succeeding. If Giselle is elongate then Giselle is limited. All detected things are succeeding. All unshod, detected things are limited. Young, gifted things are syncarpous. All elongate, limited things are gifted. All elongate things are syncarpous. All elongate, gifted things are unshod. Quiet things are limited. Pietro is not syncarpous.", "logic": "\nUnshod(carrissa)\nGifted(carrissa)\nDetected(carrissa)\nUnshod(pietro)\nGifted(pietro)\nLimited(pietro)\nElongate(pietro)\nSyncarpous(giselle)\nElongate(giselle)\nUnshod(hashim)\nSyncarpous(hashim)\nGifted(hashim)\nDetected(hashim)\nElongate(hashim)\nSucceeding(hashim)\nElongate(giselle) -> Limited(giselle)\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Unshod(x) and Detected(x) -> Limited(x))\nforall x (Succeeding(x) and Gifted(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) and Limited(x) -> Gifted(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) and Gifted(x) -> Unshod(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Limited(x))\n\nnot Syncarpous(pietro)\n\nElongate(pietro) and forall x (Elongate(x) -> Syncarpous(x)) -> therefore Syncarpous(pietro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Gladys is dismissive. Gladys is amphoric. Gladys is repetitive. Natalina is dismissive. Natalina is amphoric. Natalina is fimbriate. Natalina is celebrated. Marje is unfettered. Marje is celebrated. Helyn is dismissive. Helyn is unfettered. Helyn is amphoric. Helyn is repetitive. Helyn is celebrated. Helyn is ataractic. If Marje is celebrated then Marje is fimbriate. All repetitive things are ataractic. All dismissive, repetitive things are fimbriate. Young, amphoric things are unfettered. All celebrated, fimbriate things are amphoric. All celebrated things are unfettered. All celebrated, amphoric things are dismissive. Quiet things are fimbriate. Gladys is unfettered.", "logic": "\nDismissive(gladys)\nAmphoric(gladys)\nRepetitive(gladys)\nDismissive(natalina)\nAmphoric(natalina)\nFimbriate(natalina)\nCelebrated(natalina)\nUnfettered(marje)\nCelebrated(marje)\nDismissive(helyn)\nUnfettered(helyn)\nAmphoric(helyn)\nRepetitive(helyn)\nCelebrated(helyn)\nAtaractic(helyn)\nCelebrated(marje) -> Fimbriate(marje)\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Dismissive(x) and Repetitive(x) -> Fimbriate(x))\nforall x (Ataractic(x) and Amphoric(x) -> Unfettered(x))\nforall x (Celebrated(x) and Fimbriate(x) -> Amphoric(x))\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Unfettered(x))\nforall x (Celebrated(x) and Amphoric(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> Fimbriate(x))\n\nUnfettered(gladys)\n\nRepetitive(gladys) and forall x (Repetitive(x) -> Ataractic(x)) -> therefore Ataractic(gladys) Ataractic(gladys) and Amphoric(gladys) and forall x (Ataractic(x) and Amphoric(x) -> Unfettered(x)) -> therefore Unfettered(gladys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Kyle is unlikable. Kyle is talky. Kyle is dolomitic. Rubetta is unlikable. Rubetta is talky. Rubetta is soft. Rubetta is shadowed. Garey is cubic. Garey is shadowed. Lulita is unlikable. Lulita is cubic. Lulita is talky. Lulita is dolomitic. Lulita is shadowed. Lulita is solo. If Garey is shadowed then Garey is soft. All dolomitic things are solo. All unlikable, dolomitic things are soft. Young, talky things are cubic. All shadowed, soft things are talky. All shadowed things are cubic. All shadowed, talky things are unlikable. Quiet things are soft. Garey is not talky.", "logic": "\nUnlikable(kyle)\nTalky(kyle)\nDolomitic(kyle)\nUnlikable(rubetta)\nTalky(rubetta)\nSoft(rubetta)\nShadowed(rubetta)\nCubic(garey)\nShadowed(garey)\nUnlikable(lulita)\nCubic(lulita)\nTalky(lulita)\nDolomitic(lulita)\nShadowed(lulita)\nSolo(lulita)\nShadowed(garey) -> Soft(garey)\nforall x (Dolomitic(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Unlikable(x) and Dolomitic(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Solo(x) and Talky(x) -> Cubic(x))\nforall x (Shadowed(x) and Soft(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Shadowed(x) -> Cubic(x))\nforall x (Shadowed(x) and Talky(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nforall x (Dolomitic(x) -> Soft(x))\n\nnot Talky(garey)\n\nShadowed(garey) and Shadowed(garey) -> Soft(garey) -> therefore Soft(garey) Shadowed(garey) and Soft(garey) and forall x (Shadowed(x) and Soft(x) -> Talky(x)) -> therefore Talky(garey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Rebe is superlunar. Rebe is wainscoted. Rebe is wacky. Lenka is superlunar. Lenka is wainscoted. Lenka is unending. Lenka is informal. Devonne is grand. Devonne is informal. Roanna is superlunar. Roanna is grand. Roanna is wainscoted. Roanna is wacky. Roanna is informal. Roanna is slovakian. If Devonne is informal then Devonne is unending. All wacky things are slovakian. All superlunar, wacky things are unending. Young, wainscoted things are grand. All informal, unending things are wainscoted. All informal things are grand. All informal, wainscoted things are superlunar. Quiet things are unending. Devonne is superlunar.", "logic": "\nSuperlunar(rebe)\nWainscoted(rebe)\nWacky(rebe)\nSuperlunar(lenka)\nWainscoted(lenka)\nUnending(lenka)\nInformal(lenka)\nGrand(devonne)\nInformal(devonne)\nSuperlunar(roanna)\nGrand(roanna)\nWainscoted(roanna)\nWacky(roanna)\nInformal(roanna)\nSlovakian(roanna)\nInformal(devonne) -> Unending(devonne)\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) and Wacky(x) -> Unending(x))\nforall x (Slovakian(x) and Wainscoted(x) -> Grand(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) and Unending(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Grand(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) and Wainscoted(x) -> Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Unending(x))\n\nSuperlunar(devonne)\n\nInformal(devonne) and Informal(devonne) -> Unending(devonne) -> therefore Unending(devonne) Informal(devonne) and Unending(devonne) and forall x (Informal(x) and Unending(x) -> Wainscoted(x)) -> therefore Wainscoted(devonne) Informal(devonne) and Wainscoted(devonne) and forall x (Informal(x) and Wainscoted(x) -> Superlunar(x)) -> therefore Superlunar(devonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Desirae is moblike. Desirae is sharpened. Desirae is corking. Chase is moblike. Chase is sharpened. Chase is serious. Chase is washable. Grace is scorched. Grace is washable. Miriam is moblike. Miriam is scorched. Miriam is sharpened. Miriam is corking. Miriam is washable. Miriam is positional. If Grace is washable then Grace is serious. All corking things are positional. All moblike, corking things are serious. Young, sharpened things are scorched. All washable, serious things are sharpened. All washable things are scorched. All washable, sharpened things are moblike. Quiet things are serious. Grace is not moblike.", "logic": "\nMoblike(desirae)\nSharpened(desirae)\nCorking(desirae)\nMoblike(chase)\nSharpened(chase)\nSerious(chase)\nWashable(chase)\nScorched(grace)\nWashable(grace)\nMoblike(miriam)\nScorched(miriam)\nSharpened(miriam)\nCorking(miriam)\nWashable(miriam)\nPositional(miriam)\nWashable(grace) -> Serious(grace)\nforall x (Corking(x) -> Positional(x))\nforall x (Moblike(x) and Corking(x) -> Serious(x))\nforall x (Positional(x) and Sharpened(x) -> Scorched(x))\nforall x (Washable(x) and Serious(x) -> Sharpened(x))\nforall x (Washable(x) -> Scorched(x))\nforall x (Washable(x) and Sharpened(x) -> Moblike(x))\nforall x (Corking(x) -> Serious(x))\n\nnot Moblike(grace)\n\nWashable(grace) and Washable(grace) -> Serious(grace) -> therefore Serious(grace) Washable(grace) and Serious(grace) and forall x (Washable(x) and Serious(x) -> Sharpened(x)) -> therefore Sharpened(grace) Washable(grace) and Sharpened(grace) and forall x (Washable(x) and Sharpened(x) -> Moblike(x)) -> therefore Moblike(grace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Barbra is prodromic. Barbra is endemical. Barbra is paneled. Rodney is prodromic. Rodney is endemical. Rodney is dolorous. Rodney is sunrise. Sidonnie is smashing. Sidonnie is sunrise. Siegfried is prodromic. Siegfried is smashing. Siegfried is endemical. Siegfried is paneled. Siegfried is sunrise. Siegfried is cultivable. If Sidonnie is sunrise then Sidonnie is dolorous. All paneled things are cultivable. All prodromic, paneled things are dolorous. Young, endemical things are smashing. All sunrise, dolorous things are endemical. All sunrise things are smashing. All sunrise, endemical things are prodromic. Quiet things are dolorous. Sidonnie is not cultivable.", "logic": "\nProdromic(barbra)\nEndemical(barbra)\nPaneled(barbra)\nProdromic(rodney)\nEndemical(rodney)\nDolorous(rodney)\nSunrise(rodney)\nSmashing(sidonnie)\nSunrise(sidonnie)\nProdromic(siegfried)\nSmashing(siegfried)\nEndemical(siegfried)\nPaneled(siegfried)\nSunrise(siegfried)\nCultivable(siegfried)\nSunrise(sidonnie) -> Dolorous(sidonnie)\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Cultivable(x))\nforall x (Prodromic(x) and Paneled(x) -> Dolorous(x))\nforall x (Cultivable(x) and Endemical(x) -> Smashing(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Dolorous(x) -> Endemical(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) -> Smashing(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Endemical(x) -> Prodromic(x))\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Dolorous(x))\n\nnot Cultivable(sidonnie)\n\nforall x (Paneled(x) -> Cultivable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Karyl is gratis. Karyl is statuary. Karyl is pelecypod. Tannie is gratis. Tannie is statuary. Tannie is victimized. Tannie is starving. Wileen is nonspatial. Wileen is starving. Abelard is gratis. Abelard is nonspatial. Abelard is statuary. Abelard is pelecypod. Abelard is starving. Abelard is unattached. If Wileen is starving then Wileen is victimized. All pelecypod things are unattached. All gratis, pelecypod things are victimized. Young, statuary things are nonspatial. All starving, victimized things are statuary. All starving things are nonspatial. All starving, statuary things are gratis. Quiet things are victimized. Tannie is unattached.", "logic": "\nGratis(karyl)\nStatuary(karyl)\nPelecypod(karyl)\nGratis(tannie)\nStatuary(tannie)\nVictimized(tannie)\nStarving(tannie)\nNonspatial(wileen)\nStarving(wileen)\nGratis(abelard)\nNonspatial(abelard)\nStatuary(abelard)\nPelecypod(abelard)\nStarving(abelard)\nUnattached(abelard)\nStarving(wileen) -> Victimized(wileen)\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) -> Unattached(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) and Pelecypod(x) -> Victimized(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and Statuary(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Starving(x) and Victimized(x) -> Statuary(x))\nforall x (Starving(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Starving(x) and Statuary(x) -> Gratis(x))\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) -> Victimized(x))\n\nUnattached(tannie)\n\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) -> Unattached(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Lorilyn is aleuronic. Lorilyn is footsore. Lorilyn is septic. Devi is aleuronic. Devi is footsore. Devi is needful. Devi is caseous. Layla is transverse. Layla is caseous. Humbert is aleuronic. Humbert is transverse. Humbert is footsore. Humbert is septic. Humbert is caseous. Humbert is raddled. If Layla is caseous then Layla is needful. All septic things are raddled. All aleuronic, septic things are needful. Young, footsore things are transverse. All caseous, needful things are footsore. All caseous things are transverse. All caseous, footsore things are aleuronic. Quiet things are needful. Lorilyn is not caseous.", "logic": "\nAleuronic(lorilyn)\nFootsore(lorilyn)\nSeptic(lorilyn)\nAleuronic(devi)\nFootsore(devi)\nNeedful(devi)\nCaseous(devi)\nTransverse(layla)\nCaseous(layla)\nAleuronic(humbert)\nTransverse(humbert)\nFootsore(humbert)\nSeptic(humbert)\nCaseous(humbert)\nRaddled(humbert)\nCaseous(layla) -> Needful(layla)\nforall x (Septic(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Septic(x) -> Needful(x))\nforall x (Raddled(x) and Footsore(x) -> Transverse(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) and Needful(x) -> Footsore(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) -> Transverse(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) and Footsore(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nforall x (Septic(x) -> Needful(x))\n\nnot Caseous(lorilyn)\n\nnot Caseous(lorilyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Matilda is screwball. Matilda is blurry. Matilda is carefree. Gloria is screwball. Gloria is blurry. Gloria is lukewarm. Gloria is fistular. Bren is threepenny. Bren is fistular. Rivy is screwball. Rivy is threepenny. Rivy is blurry. Rivy is carefree. Rivy is fistular. Rivy is tumescent. If Bren is fistular then Bren is lukewarm. All carefree things are tumescent. All screwball, carefree things are lukewarm. Young, blurry things are threepenny. All fistular, lukewarm things are blurry. All fistular things are threepenny. All fistular, blurry things are screwball. Quiet things are lukewarm. Gloria is carefree.", "logic": "\nScrewball(matilda)\nBlurry(matilda)\nCarefree(matilda)\nScrewball(gloria)\nBlurry(gloria)\nLukewarm(gloria)\nFistular(gloria)\nThreepenny(bren)\nFistular(bren)\nScrewball(rivy)\nThreepenny(rivy)\nBlurry(rivy)\nCarefree(rivy)\nFistular(rivy)\nTumescent(rivy)\nFistular(bren) -> Lukewarm(bren)\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Tumescent(x))\nforall x (Screwball(x) and Carefree(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) and Blurry(x) -> Threepenny(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) and Lukewarm(x) -> Blurry(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Threepenny(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) and Blurry(x) -> Screwball(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\n\nCarefree(gloria)\n\nCarefree(gloria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1162"} {"premises": "Damita is katharobic. Damita is supposed. Damita is amok. Maddy is goddamn. Maddy is adjectival. Maddy is supposed. Maddy is hircine. If something is adjectival then it is supposed. Red things are not adjectival. If something is favourite then it is adjectival. If Maddy is adjectival then Maddy is goddamn. All favourite, supposed things are amok. If Damita is not adjectival and Damita is not supposed then Damita is goddamn. If something is supposed and not adjectival then it is hircine. If something is hircine and not adjectival then it is not goddamn. Maddy is hircine.", "logic": "\nKatharobic(damita)\nSupposed(damita)\nAmok(damita)\nGoddamn(maddy)\nAdjectival(maddy)\nSupposed(maddy)\nHircine(maddy)\nforall x (Adjectival(x) -> Supposed(x))\nforall x (Amok(x) -> not Adjectival(x))\nforall x (Favourite(x) -> Adjectival(x))\nAdjectival(maddy) -> Goddamn(maddy)\nforall x (Favourite(x) and Supposed(x) -> Amok(x))\nnot Adjectival(damita) and not Supposed(damita) -> Goddamn(damita)\nforall x (Supposed(x) and not Adjectival(x) -> Hircine(x))\nforall x (Hircine(x) and not Adjectival(x) -> not Goddamn(x))\n\nHircine(maddy)\n\ntherefore Hircine(maddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Kia is illogical. Kia is coarsened. Kia is wild. Franklyn is slumbrous. Franklyn is bulbed. Franklyn is coarsened. Franklyn is uncoated. If something is bulbed then it is coarsened. Red things are not bulbed. If something is czarist then it is bulbed. If Franklyn is bulbed then Franklyn is slumbrous. All czarist, coarsened things are wild. If Kia is not bulbed and Kia is not coarsened then Kia is slumbrous. If something is coarsened and not bulbed then it is uncoated. If something is uncoated and not bulbed then it is not slumbrous. Kia is not illogical.", "logic": "\nIllogical(kia)\nCoarsened(kia)\nWild(kia)\nSlumbrous(franklyn)\nBulbed(franklyn)\nCoarsened(franklyn)\nUncoated(franklyn)\nforall x (Bulbed(x) -> Coarsened(x))\nforall x (Wild(x) -> not Bulbed(x))\nforall x (Czarist(x) -> Bulbed(x))\nBulbed(franklyn) -> Slumbrous(franklyn)\nforall x (Czarist(x) and Coarsened(x) -> Wild(x))\nnot Bulbed(kia) and not Coarsened(kia) -> Slumbrous(kia)\nforall x (Coarsened(x) and not Bulbed(x) -> Uncoated(x))\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and not Bulbed(x) -> not Slumbrous(x))\n\nnot Illogical(kia)\n\ntherefore Illogical(kia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Barbabas is goosey. Barbabas is latino. Barbabas is scalar. Edsel is dandyish. Edsel is jumentous. Edsel is latino. Edsel is sixteenth. If something is jumentous then it is latino. Red things are not jumentous. If something is tined then it is jumentous. If Edsel is jumentous then Edsel is dandyish. All tined, latino things are scalar. If Barbabas is not jumentous and Barbabas is not latino then Barbabas is dandyish. If something is latino and not jumentous then it is sixteenth. If something is sixteenth and not jumentous then it is not dandyish. Barbabas is not jumentous.", "logic": "\nGoosey(barbabas)\nLatino(barbabas)\nScalar(barbabas)\nDandyish(edsel)\nJumentous(edsel)\nLatino(edsel)\nSixteenth(edsel)\nforall x (Jumentous(x) -> Latino(x))\nforall x (Scalar(x) -> not Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nJumentous(edsel) -> Dandyish(edsel)\nforall x (Tined(x) and Latino(x) -> Scalar(x))\nnot Jumentous(barbabas) and not Latino(barbabas) -> Dandyish(barbabas)\nforall x (Latino(x) and not Jumentous(x) -> Sixteenth(x))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) and not Jumentous(x) -> not Dandyish(x))\n\nnot Jumentous(barbabas)\n\nScalar(barbabas) and forall x (Scalar(x) -> not Jumentous(x)) -> therefore not Jumentous(barbabas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Dean is cancelled. Dean is pursuant. Dean is staccato. Deirdre is capillary. Deirdre is myotic. Deirdre is pursuant. Deirdre is whiny. If something is myotic then it is pursuant. Red things are not myotic. If something is sedgelike then it is myotic. If Deirdre is myotic then Deirdre is capillary. All sedgelike, pursuant things are staccato. If Dean is not myotic and Dean is not pursuant then Dean is capillary. If something is pursuant and not myotic then it is whiny. If something is whiny and not myotic then it is not capillary. Dean is myotic.", "logic": "\nCancelled(dean)\nPursuant(dean)\nStaccato(dean)\nCapillary(deirdre)\nMyotic(deirdre)\nPursuant(deirdre)\nWhiny(deirdre)\nforall x (Myotic(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> not Myotic(x))\nforall x (Sedgelike(x) -> Myotic(x))\nMyotic(deirdre) -> Capillary(deirdre)\nforall x (Sedgelike(x) and Pursuant(x) -> Staccato(x))\nnot Myotic(dean) and not Pursuant(dean) -> Capillary(dean)\nforall x (Pursuant(x) and not Myotic(x) -> Whiny(x))\nforall x (Whiny(x) and not Myotic(x) -> not Capillary(x))\n\nMyotic(dean)\n\nStaccato(dean) and forall x (Staccato(x) -> not Myotic(x)) -> therefore not Myotic(dean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Dorrie is acceptant. Dorrie is consolable. Dorrie is uncreative. Selinda is engaging. Selinda is unequaled. Selinda is consolable. Selinda is gelid. If something is unequaled then it is consolable. Red things are not unequaled. If something is envisioned then it is unequaled. If Selinda is unequaled then Selinda is engaging. All envisioned, consolable things are uncreative. If Dorrie is not unequaled and Dorrie is not consolable then Dorrie is engaging. If something is consolable and not unequaled then it is gelid. If something is gelid and not unequaled then it is not engaging. Dorrie is gelid.", "logic": "\nAcceptant(dorrie)\nConsolable(dorrie)\nUncreative(dorrie)\nEngaging(selinda)\nUnequaled(selinda)\nConsolable(selinda)\nGelid(selinda)\nforall x (Unequaled(x) -> Consolable(x))\nforall x (Uncreative(x) -> not Unequaled(x))\nforall x (Envisioned(x) -> Unequaled(x))\nUnequaled(selinda) -> Engaging(selinda)\nforall x (Envisioned(x) and Consolable(x) -> Uncreative(x))\nnot Unequaled(dorrie) and not Consolable(dorrie) -> Engaging(dorrie)\nforall x (Consolable(x) and not Unequaled(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Gelid(x) and not Unequaled(x) -> not Engaging(x))\n\nGelid(dorrie)\n\nUncreative(dorrie) and forall x (Uncreative(x) -> not Unequaled(x)) -> therefore not Unequaled(dorrie) Consolable(dorrie) and not Unequaled(dorrie) and forall x (Consolable(x) and not Unequaled(x) -> Gelid(x)) -> therefore Gelid(dorrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Noellyn is peculiar. Noellyn is compulsive. Noellyn is straplike. Susann is concessive. Susann is emblematic. Susann is compulsive. Susann is socialized. If something is emblematic then it is compulsive. Red things are not emblematic. If something is alpine then it is emblematic. If Susann is emblematic then Susann is concessive. All alpine, compulsive things are straplike. If Noellyn is not emblematic and Noellyn is not compulsive then Noellyn is concessive. If something is compulsive and not emblematic then it is socialized. If something is socialized and not emblematic then it is not concessive. Noellyn is not socialized.", "logic": "\nPeculiar(noellyn)\nCompulsive(noellyn)\nStraplike(noellyn)\nConcessive(susann)\nEmblematic(susann)\nCompulsive(susann)\nSocialized(susann)\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Compulsive(x))\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> not Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Alpine(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nEmblematic(susann) -> Concessive(susann)\nforall x (Alpine(x) and Compulsive(x) -> Straplike(x))\nnot Emblematic(noellyn) and not Compulsive(noellyn) -> Concessive(noellyn)\nforall x (Compulsive(x) and not Emblematic(x) -> Socialized(x))\nforall x (Socialized(x) and not Emblematic(x) -> not Concessive(x))\n\nnot Socialized(noellyn)\n\nStraplike(noellyn) and forall x (Straplike(x) -> not Emblematic(x)) -> therefore not Emblematic(noellyn) Compulsive(noellyn) and not Emblematic(noellyn) and forall x (Compulsive(x) and not Emblematic(x) -> Socialized(x)) -> therefore Socialized(noellyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Shana is invitatory. Shana is indefinite. Shana is antiphonal. Doralia is aryan. Doralia is guided. Doralia is indefinite. Doralia is nestled. If something is guided then it is indefinite. Red things are not guided. If something is anonymous then it is guided. If Doralia is guided then Doralia is aryan. All anonymous, indefinite things are antiphonal. If Shana is not guided and Shana is not indefinite then Shana is aryan. If something is indefinite and not guided then it is nestled. If something is nestled and not guided then it is not aryan. Shana is not aryan.", "logic": "\nInvitatory(shana)\nIndefinite(shana)\nAntiphonal(shana)\nAryan(doralia)\nGuided(doralia)\nIndefinite(doralia)\nNestled(doralia)\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Indefinite(x))\nforall x (Antiphonal(x) -> not Guided(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Guided(x))\nGuided(doralia) -> Aryan(doralia)\nforall x (Anonymous(x) and Indefinite(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nnot Guided(shana) and not Indefinite(shana) -> Aryan(shana)\nforall x (Indefinite(x) and not Guided(x) -> Nestled(x))\nforall x (Nestled(x) and not Guided(x) -> not Aryan(x))\n\nnot Aryan(shana)\n\nAntiphonal(shana) and forall x (Antiphonal(x) -> not Guided(x)) -> therefore not Guided(shana) Indefinite(shana) and not Guided(shana) and forall x (Indefinite(x) and not Guided(x) -> Nestled(x)) -> therefore Nestled(shana) Antiphonal(shana) and forall x (Antiphonal(x) -> not Guided(x)) -> therefore not Guided(shana) Nestled(shana) and not Guided(shana) and forall x (Nestled(x) and not Guided(x) -> not Aryan(x)) -> therefore not Aryan(shana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Devan is ignitable. Devan is useful. Devan is doubting. Bonny is cyan. Bonny is crescendo. Bonny is useful. Bonny is fearful. If something is crescendo then it is useful. Red things are not crescendo. If something is unlettered then it is crescendo. If Bonny is crescendo then Bonny is cyan. All unlettered, useful things are doubting. If Devan is not crescendo and Devan is not useful then Devan is cyan. If something is useful and not crescendo then it is fearful. If something is fearful and not crescendo then it is not cyan. Devan is cyan.", "logic": "\nIgnitable(devan)\nUseful(devan)\nDoubting(devan)\nCyan(bonny)\nCrescendo(bonny)\nUseful(bonny)\nFearful(bonny)\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Useful(x))\nforall x (Doubting(x) -> not Crescendo(x))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nCrescendo(bonny) -> Cyan(bonny)\nforall x (Unlettered(x) and Useful(x) -> Doubting(x))\nnot Crescendo(devan) and not Useful(devan) -> Cyan(devan)\nforall x (Useful(x) and not Crescendo(x) -> Fearful(x))\nforall x (Fearful(x) and not Crescendo(x) -> not Cyan(x))\n\nCyan(devan)\n\nDoubting(devan) and forall x (Doubting(x) -> not Crescendo(x)) -> therefore not Crescendo(devan) Useful(devan) and not Crescendo(devan) and forall x (Useful(x) and not Crescendo(x) -> Fearful(x)) -> therefore Fearful(devan) Doubting(devan) and forall x (Doubting(x) -> not Crescendo(x)) -> therefore not Crescendo(devan) Fearful(devan) and not Crescendo(devan) and forall x (Fearful(x) and not Crescendo(x) -> not Cyan(x)) -> therefore not Cyan(devan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Daisie is eparchial. Daisie is highflying. Daisie is aeolian. Leila is ruby. Leila is forty. Leila is highflying. Leila is illusive. If something is forty then it is highflying. Red things are not forty. If something is chanted then it is forty. If Leila is forty then Leila is ruby. All chanted, highflying things are aeolian. If Daisie is not forty and Daisie is not highflying then Daisie is ruby. If something is highflying and not forty then it is illusive. If something is illusive and not forty then it is not ruby. Leila is not aeolian.", "logic": "\nEparchial(daisie)\nHighflying(daisie)\nAeolian(daisie)\nRuby(leila)\nForty(leila)\nHighflying(leila)\nIllusive(leila)\nforall x (Forty(x) -> Highflying(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> not Forty(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Forty(x))\nForty(leila) -> Ruby(leila)\nforall x (Chanted(x) and Highflying(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nnot Forty(daisie) and not Highflying(daisie) -> Ruby(daisie)\nforall x (Highflying(x) and not Forty(x) -> Illusive(x))\nforall x (Illusive(x) and not Forty(x) -> not Ruby(x))\n\nnot Aeolian(leila)\n\nforall x (Chanted(x) and Highflying(x) -> Aeolian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Mitzi is sordid. Mitzi is amative. Mitzi is external. Marianna is softheaded. Marianna is validatory. Marianna is amative. Marianna is didactic. If something is validatory then it is amative. Red things are not validatory. If something is shitty then it is validatory. If Marianna is validatory then Marianna is softheaded. All shitty, amative things are external. If Mitzi is not validatory and Mitzi is not amative then Mitzi is softheaded. If something is amative and not validatory then it is didactic. If something is didactic and not validatory then it is not softheaded. Marianna is sordid.", "logic": "\nSordid(mitzi)\nAmative(mitzi)\nExternal(mitzi)\nSoftheaded(marianna)\nValidatory(marianna)\nAmative(marianna)\nDidactic(marianna)\nforall x (Validatory(x) -> Amative(x))\nforall x (External(x) -> not Validatory(x))\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Validatory(x))\nValidatory(marianna) -> Softheaded(marianna)\nforall x (Shitty(x) and Amative(x) -> External(x))\nnot Validatory(mitzi) and not Amative(mitzi) -> Softheaded(mitzi)\nforall x (Amative(x) and not Validatory(x) -> Didactic(x))\nforall x (Didactic(x) and not Validatory(x) -> not Softheaded(x))\n\nSordid(marianna)\n\nSordid(marianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Roseanna is slothful. Roseanna is feverous. Roseanna is curling. Chere is equal. Chere is unrevealed. Chere is feverous. Chere is forceful. If something is unrevealed then it is feverous. Red things are not unrevealed. If something is caucasic then it is unrevealed. If Chere is unrevealed then Chere is equal. All caucasic, feverous things are curling. If Roseanna is not unrevealed and Roseanna is not feverous then Roseanna is equal. If something is feverous and not unrevealed then it is forceful. If something is forceful and not unrevealed then it is not equal. Roseanna is not caucasic.", "logic": "\nSlothful(roseanna)\nFeverous(roseanna)\nCurling(roseanna)\nEqual(chere)\nUnrevealed(chere)\nFeverous(chere)\nForceful(chere)\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Feverous(x))\nforall x (Curling(x) -> not Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Caucasic(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nUnrevealed(chere) -> Equal(chere)\nforall x (Caucasic(x) and Feverous(x) -> Curling(x))\nnot Unrevealed(roseanna) and not Feverous(roseanna) -> Equal(roseanna)\nforall x (Feverous(x) and not Unrevealed(x) -> Forceful(x))\nforall x (Forceful(x) and not Unrevealed(x) -> not Equal(x))\n\nnot Caucasic(roseanna)\n\nnot Caucasic(roseanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "Wylie is inherited. Wylie is ridged. Wylie is binaural. Netti is militant. Netti is squelched. Netti is ridged. Netti is goddamned. If something is squelched then it is ridged. Red things are not squelched. If something is algophobic then it is squelched. If Netti is squelched then Netti is militant. All algophobic, ridged things are binaural. If Wylie is not squelched and Wylie is not ridged then Wylie is militant. If something is ridged and not squelched then it is goddamned. If something is goddamned and not squelched then it is not militant. Netti is algophobic.", "logic": "\nInherited(wylie)\nRidged(wylie)\nBinaural(wylie)\nMilitant(netti)\nSquelched(netti)\nRidged(netti)\nGoddamned(netti)\nforall x (Squelched(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> not Squelched(x))\nforall x (Algophobic(x) -> Squelched(x))\nSquelched(netti) -> Militant(netti)\nforall x (Algophobic(x) and Ridged(x) -> Binaural(x))\nnot Squelched(wylie) and not Ridged(wylie) -> Militant(wylie)\nforall x (Ridged(x) and not Squelched(x) -> Goddamned(x))\nforall x (Goddamned(x) and not Squelched(x) -> not Militant(x))\n\nAlgophobic(netti)\n\nAlgophobic(netti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-826"} {"premises": "The aron immerse the tia. The aron immerse the katheleen. The aron open the tia. The aron is dynamic. The aron is spurious. The aron intrust the katheleen. The tia immerse the katheleen. The tia is dynamic. The tia is spurious. The tia is unimpaired. The tia is mailed. The tia intrust the katheleen. The katheleen is obstinate. The katheleen intrust the aron. The katheleen intrust the tia. If someone open the tia and the tia is unimpaired then the tia intrust the aron. If someone is unimpaired then they chase the tia. If someone open the katheleen and they chase the aron then the aron is obstinate. If someone is unimpaired then they eat the tia. If someone intrust the aron then they eat the katheleen. If the katheleen open the tia and the katheleen intrust the aron then the katheleen immerse the aron. If someone is spurious and they visit the aron then the aron is mailed. If someone is obstinate then they chase the aron. The tia is mailed.", "logic": "\nImmerse(aron, tia)\nImmerse(aron, katheleen)\nOpen(aron, tia)\nDynamic(aron)\nSpurious(aron)\nIntrust(aron, katheleen)\nImmerse(tia, katheleen)\nDynamic(tia)\nSpurious(tia)\nUnimpaired(tia)\nMailed(tia)\nIntrust(tia, katheleen)\nObstinate(katheleen)\nIntrust(katheleen, aron)\nIntrust(katheleen, tia)\nforall x (Open(x, tia) and Unimpaired(tia) -> Intrust(tia, aron))\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) -> Immerse(x, tia))\nforall x (Open(x, katheleen) and Immerse(x, aron) -> Obstinate(aron))\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) -> Open(x, tia))\nforall x (Intrust(x, aron) -> Open(x, katheleen))\nOpen(katheleen, tia) and Intrust(katheleen, aron) -> Immerse(katheleen, aron)\nforall x (Spurious(x) and Intrust(x, aron) -> Mailed(aron))\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> Immerse(x, aron))\n\nMailed(tia)\n\ntherefore Mailed(tia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The bartlett vomit the hannis. The bartlett vomit the lissie. The bartlett ballyrag the hannis. The bartlett is protozoal. The bartlett is willowy. The bartlett reforge the lissie. The hannis vomit the lissie. The hannis is protozoal. The hannis is willowy. The hannis is spurious. The hannis is cobwebby. The hannis reforge the lissie. The lissie is manorial. The lissie reforge the bartlett. The lissie reforge the hannis. If someone ballyrag the hannis and the hannis is spurious then the hannis reforge the bartlett. If someone is spurious then they chase the hannis. If someone ballyrag the lissie and they chase the bartlett then the bartlett is manorial. If someone is spurious then they eat the hannis. If someone reforge the bartlett then they eat the lissie. If the lissie ballyrag the hannis and the lissie reforge the bartlett then the lissie vomit the bartlett. If someone is willowy and they visit the bartlett then the bartlett is cobwebby. If someone is manorial then they chase the bartlett. The hannis is not protozoal.", "logic": "\nVomit(bartlett, hannis)\nVomit(bartlett, lissie)\nBallyrag(bartlett, hannis)\nProtozoal(bartlett)\nWillowy(bartlett)\nReforge(bartlett, lissie)\nVomit(hannis, lissie)\nProtozoal(hannis)\nWillowy(hannis)\nSpurious(hannis)\nCobwebby(hannis)\nReforge(hannis, lissie)\nManorial(lissie)\nReforge(lissie, bartlett)\nReforge(lissie, hannis)\nforall x (Ballyrag(x, hannis) and Spurious(hannis) -> Reforge(hannis, bartlett))\nforall x (Spurious(x) -> Vomit(x, hannis))\nforall x (Ballyrag(x, lissie) and Vomit(x, bartlett) -> Manorial(bartlett))\nforall x (Spurious(x) -> Ballyrag(x, hannis))\nforall x (Reforge(x, bartlett) -> Ballyrag(x, lissie))\nBallyrag(lissie, hannis) and Reforge(lissie, bartlett) -> Vomit(lissie, bartlett)\nforall x (Willowy(x) and Reforge(x, bartlett) -> Cobwebby(bartlett))\nforall x (Manorial(x) -> Vomit(x, bartlett))\n\nnot Protozoal(hannis)\n\ntherefore Protozoal(hannis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The mitchel edify the neila. The mitchel edify the janenna. The mitchel subdivide the neila. The mitchel is slaveless. The mitchel is returning. The mitchel backstitch the janenna. The neila edify the janenna. The neila is slaveless. The neila is returning. The neila is alarmed. The neila is stylized. The neila backstitch the janenna. The janenna is mucinous. The janenna backstitch the mitchel. The janenna backstitch the neila. If someone subdivide the neila and the neila is alarmed then the neila backstitch the mitchel. If someone is alarmed then they chase the neila. If someone subdivide the janenna and they chase the mitchel then the mitchel is mucinous. If someone is alarmed then they eat the neila. If someone backstitch the mitchel then they eat the janenna. If the janenna subdivide the neila and the janenna backstitch the mitchel then the janenna edify the mitchel. If someone is returning and they visit the mitchel then the mitchel is stylized. If someone is mucinous then they chase the mitchel. The neila edify the neila.", "logic": "\nEdify(mitchel, neila)\nEdify(mitchel, janenna)\nSubdivide(mitchel, neila)\nSlaveless(mitchel)\nReturning(mitchel)\nBackstitch(mitchel, janenna)\nEdify(neila, janenna)\nSlaveless(neila)\nReturning(neila)\nAlarmed(neila)\nStylized(neila)\nBackstitch(neila, janenna)\nMucinous(janenna)\nBackstitch(janenna, mitchel)\nBackstitch(janenna, neila)\nforall x (Subdivide(x, neila) and Alarmed(neila) -> Backstitch(neila, mitchel))\nforall x (Alarmed(x) -> Edify(x, neila))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, janenna) and Edify(x, mitchel) -> Mucinous(mitchel))\nforall x (Alarmed(x) -> Subdivide(x, neila))\nforall x (Backstitch(x, mitchel) -> Subdivide(x, janenna))\nSubdivide(janenna, neila) and Backstitch(janenna, mitchel) -> Edify(janenna, mitchel)\nforall x (Returning(x) and Backstitch(x, mitchel) -> Stylized(mitchel))\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Edify(x, mitchel))\n\nEdify(neila, neila)\n\nAlarmed(neila) and forall x (Alarmed(x) -> Edify(x, neila)) -> therefore Edify(neila, neila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The kristi welch the shandra. The kristi welch the daveen. The kristi smudge the shandra. The kristi is livelong. The kristi is voluble. The kristi pour the daveen. The shandra welch the daveen. The shandra is livelong. The shandra is voluble. The shandra is tyrannous. The shandra is neither. The shandra pour the daveen. The daveen is overland. The daveen pour the kristi. The daveen pour the shandra. If someone smudge the shandra and the shandra is tyrannous then the shandra pour the kristi. If someone is tyrannous then they chase the shandra. If someone smudge the daveen and they chase the kristi then the kristi is overland. If someone is tyrannous then they eat the shandra. If someone pour the kristi then they eat the daveen. If the daveen smudge the shandra and the daveen pour the kristi then the daveen welch the kristi. If someone is voluble and they visit the kristi then the kristi is neither. If someone is overland then they chase the kristi. The daveen does not chase the kristi.", "logic": "\nWelch(kristi, shandra)\nWelch(kristi, daveen)\nSmudge(kristi, shandra)\nLivelong(kristi)\nVoluble(kristi)\nPour(kristi, daveen)\nWelch(shandra, daveen)\nLivelong(shandra)\nVoluble(shandra)\nTyrannous(shandra)\nNeither(shandra)\nPour(shandra, daveen)\nOverland(daveen)\nPour(daveen, kristi)\nPour(daveen, shandra)\nforall x (Smudge(x, shandra) and Tyrannous(shandra) -> Pour(shandra, kristi))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Welch(x, shandra))\nforall x (Smudge(x, daveen) and Welch(x, kristi) -> Overland(kristi))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Smudge(x, shandra))\nforall x (Pour(x, kristi) -> Smudge(x, daveen))\nSmudge(daveen, shandra) and Pour(daveen, kristi) -> Welch(daveen, kristi)\nforall x (Voluble(x) and Pour(x, kristi) -> Neither(kristi))\nforall x (Overland(x) -> Welch(x, kristi))\n\nnot Welch(daveen, kristi)\n\nOverland(daveen) and forall x (Overland(x) -> Welch(x, kristi)) -> therefore Welch(daveen, kristi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The vally deepen the maxim. The vally deepen the leigha. The vally upset the maxim. The vally is vehement. The vally is nonliteral. The vally coffin the leigha. The maxim deepen the leigha. The maxim is vehement. The maxim is nonliteral. The maxim is tactful. The maxim is ersatz. The maxim coffin the leigha. The leigha is pedantic. The leigha coffin the vally. The leigha coffin the maxim. If someone upset the maxim and the maxim is tactful then the maxim coffin the vally. If someone is tactful then they chase the maxim. If someone upset the leigha and they chase the vally then the vally is pedantic. If someone is tactful then they eat the maxim. If someone coffin the vally then they eat the leigha. If the leigha upset the maxim and the leigha coffin the vally then the leigha deepen the vally. If someone is nonliteral and they visit the vally then the vally is ersatz. If someone is pedantic then they chase the vally. The maxim upset the leigha.", "logic": "\nDeepen(vally, maxim)\nDeepen(vally, leigha)\nUpset(vally, maxim)\nVehement(vally)\nNonliteral(vally)\nCoffin(vally, leigha)\nDeepen(maxim, leigha)\nVehement(maxim)\nNonliteral(maxim)\nTactful(maxim)\nErsatz(maxim)\nCoffin(maxim, leigha)\nPedantic(leigha)\nCoffin(leigha, vally)\nCoffin(leigha, maxim)\nforall x (Upset(x, maxim) and Tactful(maxim) -> Coffin(maxim, vally))\nforall x (Tactful(x) -> Deepen(x, maxim))\nforall x (Upset(x, leigha) and Deepen(x, vally) -> Pedantic(vally))\nforall x (Tactful(x) -> Upset(x, maxim))\nforall x (Coffin(x, vally) -> Upset(x, leigha))\nUpset(leigha, maxim) and Coffin(leigha, vally) -> Deepen(leigha, vally)\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) and Coffin(x, vally) -> Ersatz(vally))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Deepen(x, vally))\n\nUpset(maxim, leigha)\n\nUpset(vally, maxim) and Tactful(maxim) and forall x (Upset(x, maxim) and Tactful(maxim) -> Coffin(maxim, vally)) -> therefore Coffin(maxim, vally) Coffin(maxim, vally) and forall x (Coffin(x, vally) -> Upset(x, leigha)) -> therefore Upset(maxim, leigha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The sloan franchise the lincoln. The sloan franchise the elita. The sloan tend the lincoln. The sloan is caducous. The sloan is unrivaled. The sloan burke the elita. The lincoln franchise the elita. The lincoln is caducous. The lincoln is unrivaled. The lincoln is copular. The lincoln is semiannual. The lincoln burke the elita. The elita is scurrying. The elita burke the sloan. The elita burke the lincoln. If someone tend the lincoln and the lincoln is copular then the lincoln burke the sloan. If someone is copular then they chase the lincoln. If someone tend the elita and they chase the sloan then the sloan is scurrying. If someone is copular then they eat the lincoln. If someone burke the sloan then they eat the elita. If the elita tend the lincoln and the elita burke the sloan then the elita franchise the sloan. If someone is unrivaled and they visit the sloan then the sloan is semiannual. If someone is scurrying then they chase the sloan. The sloan is not semiannual.", "logic": "\nFranchise(sloan, lincoln)\nFranchise(sloan, elita)\nTend(sloan, lincoln)\nCaducous(sloan)\nUnrivaled(sloan)\nBurke(sloan, elita)\nFranchise(lincoln, elita)\nCaducous(lincoln)\nUnrivaled(lincoln)\nCopular(lincoln)\nSemiannual(lincoln)\nBurke(lincoln, elita)\nScurrying(elita)\nBurke(elita, sloan)\nBurke(elita, lincoln)\nforall x (Tend(x, lincoln) and Copular(lincoln) -> Burke(lincoln, sloan))\nforall x (Copular(x) -> Franchise(x, lincoln))\nforall x (Tend(x, elita) and Franchise(x, sloan) -> Scurrying(sloan))\nforall x (Copular(x) -> Tend(x, lincoln))\nforall x (Burke(x, sloan) -> Tend(x, elita))\nTend(elita, lincoln) and Burke(elita, sloan) -> Franchise(elita, sloan)\nforall x (Unrivaled(x) and Burke(x, sloan) -> Semiannual(sloan))\nforall x (Scurrying(x) -> Franchise(x, sloan))\n\nnot Semiannual(sloan)\n\nTend(sloan, lincoln) and Copular(lincoln) and forall x (Tend(x, lincoln) and Copular(lincoln) -> Burke(lincoln, sloan)) -> therefore Burke(lincoln, sloan) Unrivaled(lincoln) and Burke(lincoln, sloan) and forall x (Unrivaled(x) and Burke(x, sloan) -> Semiannual(sloan)) -> therefore Semiannual(sloan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The jesus overdraw the cass. The jesus overdraw the billi. The jesus twill the cass. The jesus is apomictic. The jesus is separatist. The jesus postpone the billi. The cass overdraw the billi. The cass is apomictic. The cass is separatist. The cass is alate. The cass is rateable. The cass postpone the billi. The billi is appositive. The billi postpone the jesus. The billi postpone the cass. If someone twill the cass and the cass is alate then the cass postpone the jesus. If someone is alate then they chase the cass. If someone twill the billi and they chase the jesus then the jesus is appositive. If someone is alate then they eat the cass. If someone postpone the jesus then they eat the billi. If the billi twill the cass and the billi postpone the jesus then the billi overdraw the jesus. If someone is separatist and they visit the jesus then the jesus is rateable. If someone is appositive then they chase the jesus. The jesus overdraw the jesus.", "logic": "\nOverdraw(jesus, cass)\nOverdraw(jesus, billi)\nTwill(jesus, cass)\nApomictic(jesus)\nSeparatist(jesus)\nPostpone(jesus, billi)\nOverdraw(cass, billi)\nApomictic(cass)\nSeparatist(cass)\nAlate(cass)\nRateable(cass)\nPostpone(cass, billi)\nAppositive(billi)\nPostpone(billi, jesus)\nPostpone(billi, cass)\nforall x (Twill(x, cass) and Alate(cass) -> Postpone(cass, jesus))\nforall x (Alate(x) -> Overdraw(x, cass))\nforall x (Twill(x, billi) and Overdraw(x, jesus) -> Appositive(jesus))\nforall x (Alate(x) -> Twill(x, cass))\nforall x (Postpone(x, jesus) -> Twill(x, billi))\nTwill(billi, cass) and Postpone(billi, jesus) -> Overdraw(billi, jesus)\nforall x (Separatist(x) and Postpone(x, jesus) -> Rateable(jesus))\nforall x (Appositive(x) -> Overdraw(x, jesus))\n\nOverdraw(jesus, jesus)\n\nPostpone(billi, jesus) and forall x (Postpone(x, jesus) -> Twill(x, billi)) -> therefore Twill(billi, billi) Appositive(billi) and forall x (Appositive(x) -> Overdraw(x, jesus)) -> therefore Overdraw(billi, jesus) Twill(billi, billi) and Overdraw(billi, jesus) and forall x (Twill(x, billi) and Overdraw(x, jesus) -> Appositive(jesus)) -> therefore Appositive(jesus) Appositive(jesus) and forall x (Appositive(x) -> Overdraw(x, jesus)) -> therefore Overdraw(jesus, jesus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The buck rope the izak. The buck rope the ellie. The buck bouse the izak. The buck is descendant. The buck is springless. The buck spangle the ellie. The izak rope the ellie. The izak is descendant. The izak is springless. The izak is gladsome. The izak is twilled. The izak spangle the ellie. The ellie is beatified. The ellie spangle the buck. The ellie spangle the izak. If someone bouse the izak and the izak is gladsome then the izak spangle the buck. If someone is gladsome then they chase the izak. If someone bouse the ellie and they chase the buck then the buck is beatified. If someone is gladsome then they eat the izak. If someone spangle the buck then they eat the ellie. If the ellie bouse the izak and the ellie spangle the buck then the ellie rope the buck. If someone is springless and they visit the buck then the buck is twilled. If someone is beatified then they chase the buck. The buck does not chase the buck.", "logic": "\nRope(buck, izak)\nRope(buck, ellie)\nBouse(buck, izak)\nDescendant(buck)\nSpringless(buck)\nSpangle(buck, ellie)\nRope(izak, ellie)\nDescendant(izak)\nSpringless(izak)\nGladsome(izak)\nTwilled(izak)\nSpangle(izak, ellie)\nBeatified(ellie)\nSpangle(ellie, buck)\nSpangle(ellie, izak)\nforall x (Bouse(x, izak) and Gladsome(izak) -> Spangle(izak, buck))\nforall x (Gladsome(x) -> Rope(x, izak))\nforall x (Bouse(x, ellie) and Rope(x, buck) -> Beatified(buck))\nforall x (Gladsome(x) -> Bouse(x, izak))\nforall x (Spangle(x, buck) -> Bouse(x, ellie))\nBouse(ellie, izak) and Spangle(ellie, buck) -> Rope(ellie, buck)\nforall x (Springless(x) and Spangle(x, buck) -> Twilled(buck))\nforall x (Beatified(x) -> Rope(x, buck))\n\nnot Rope(buck, buck)\n\nSpangle(ellie, buck) and forall x (Spangle(x, buck) -> Bouse(x, ellie)) -> therefore Bouse(ellie, ellie) Beatified(ellie) and forall x (Beatified(x) -> Rope(x, buck)) -> therefore Rope(ellie, buck) Bouse(ellie, ellie) and Rope(ellie, buck) and forall x (Bouse(x, ellie) and Rope(x, buck) -> Beatified(buck)) -> therefore Beatified(buck) Beatified(buck) and forall x (Beatified(x) -> Rope(x, buck)) -> therefore Rope(buck, buck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The lanny bogey the michelle. The lanny bogey the veronike. The lanny ponder the michelle. The lanny is unsweet. The lanny is roadless. The lanny subpoena the veronike. The michelle bogey the veronike. The michelle is unsweet. The michelle is roadless. The michelle is nazi. The michelle is hearty. The michelle subpoena the veronike. The veronike is discordant. The veronike subpoena the lanny. The veronike subpoena the michelle. If someone ponder the michelle and the michelle is nazi then the michelle subpoena the lanny. If someone is nazi then they chase the michelle. If someone ponder the veronike and they chase the lanny then the lanny is discordant. If someone is nazi then they eat the michelle. If someone subpoena the lanny then they eat the veronike. If the veronike ponder the michelle and the veronike subpoena the lanny then the veronike bogey the lanny. If someone is roadless and they visit the lanny then the lanny is hearty. If someone is discordant then they chase the lanny. The veronike does not eat the michelle.", "logic": "\nBogey(lanny, michelle)\nBogey(lanny, veronike)\nPonder(lanny, michelle)\nUnsweet(lanny)\nRoadless(lanny)\nSubpoena(lanny, veronike)\nBogey(michelle, veronike)\nUnsweet(michelle)\nRoadless(michelle)\nNazi(michelle)\nHearty(michelle)\nSubpoena(michelle, veronike)\nDiscordant(veronike)\nSubpoena(veronike, lanny)\nSubpoena(veronike, michelle)\nforall x (Ponder(x, michelle) and Nazi(michelle) -> Subpoena(michelle, lanny))\nforall x (Nazi(x) -> Bogey(x, michelle))\nforall x (Ponder(x, veronike) and Bogey(x, lanny) -> Discordant(lanny))\nforall x (Nazi(x) -> Ponder(x, michelle))\nforall x (Subpoena(x, lanny) -> Ponder(x, veronike))\nPonder(veronike, michelle) and Subpoena(veronike, lanny) -> Bogey(veronike, lanny)\nforall x (Roadless(x) and Subpoena(x, lanny) -> Hearty(lanny))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> Bogey(x, lanny))\n\nnot Ponder(veronike, michelle)\n\nforall x (Nazi(x) -> Ponder(x, michelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The julienne rectify the stinky. The julienne rectify the frederico. The julienne loiter the stinky. The julienne is brambly. The julienne is mesic. The julienne umpire the frederico. The stinky rectify the frederico. The stinky is brambly. The stinky is mesic. The stinky is overstrung. The stinky is ultimo. The stinky umpire the frederico. The frederico is unroofed. The frederico umpire the julienne. The frederico umpire the stinky. If someone loiter the stinky and the stinky is overstrung then the stinky umpire the julienne. If someone is overstrung then they chase the stinky. If someone loiter the frederico and they chase the julienne then the julienne is unroofed. If someone is overstrung then they eat the stinky. If someone umpire the julienne then they eat the frederico. If the frederico loiter the stinky and the frederico umpire the julienne then the frederico rectify the julienne. If someone is mesic and they visit the julienne then the julienne is ultimo. If someone is unroofed then they chase the julienne. The stinky rectify the julienne.", "logic": "\nRectify(julienne, stinky)\nRectify(julienne, frederico)\nLoiter(julienne, stinky)\nBrambly(julienne)\nMesic(julienne)\nUmpire(julienne, frederico)\nRectify(stinky, frederico)\nBrambly(stinky)\nMesic(stinky)\nOverstrung(stinky)\nUltimo(stinky)\nUmpire(stinky, frederico)\nUnroofed(frederico)\nUmpire(frederico, julienne)\nUmpire(frederico, stinky)\nforall x (Loiter(x, stinky) and Overstrung(stinky) -> Umpire(stinky, julienne))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Rectify(x, stinky))\nforall x (Loiter(x, frederico) and Rectify(x, julienne) -> Unroofed(julienne))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Loiter(x, stinky))\nforall x (Umpire(x, julienne) -> Loiter(x, frederico))\nLoiter(frederico, stinky) and Umpire(frederico, julienne) -> Rectify(frederico, julienne)\nforall x (Mesic(x) and Umpire(x, julienne) -> Ultimo(julienne))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Rectify(x, julienne))\n\nRectify(stinky, julienne)\n\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Rectify(x, julienne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The cleland effloresce the yoko. The cleland effloresce the izzy. The cleland ginger the yoko. The cleland is thick. The cleland is askance. The cleland lighter the izzy. The yoko effloresce the izzy. The yoko is thick. The yoko is askance. The yoko is rolling. The yoko is unfettered. The yoko lighter the izzy. The izzy is improving. The izzy lighter the cleland. The izzy lighter the yoko. If someone ginger the yoko and the yoko is rolling then the yoko lighter the cleland. If someone is rolling then they chase the yoko. If someone ginger the izzy and they chase the cleland then the cleland is improving. If someone is rolling then they eat the yoko. If someone lighter the cleland then they eat the izzy. If the izzy ginger the yoko and the izzy lighter the cleland then the izzy effloresce the cleland. If someone is askance and they visit the cleland then the cleland is unfettered. If someone is improving then they chase the cleland. The izzy does not chase the yoko.", "logic": "\nEffloresce(cleland, yoko)\nEffloresce(cleland, izzy)\nGinger(cleland, yoko)\nThick(cleland)\nAskance(cleland)\nLighter(cleland, izzy)\nEffloresce(yoko, izzy)\nThick(yoko)\nAskance(yoko)\nRolling(yoko)\nUnfettered(yoko)\nLighter(yoko, izzy)\nImproving(izzy)\nLighter(izzy, cleland)\nLighter(izzy, yoko)\nforall x (Ginger(x, yoko) and Rolling(yoko) -> Lighter(yoko, cleland))\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Effloresce(x, yoko))\nforall x (Ginger(x, izzy) and Effloresce(x, cleland) -> Improving(cleland))\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Ginger(x, yoko))\nforall x (Lighter(x, cleland) -> Ginger(x, izzy))\nGinger(izzy, yoko) and Lighter(izzy, cleland) -> Effloresce(izzy, cleland)\nforall x (Askance(x) and Lighter(x, cleland) -> Unfettered(cleland))\nforall x (Improving(x) -> Effloresce(x, cleland))\n\nnot Effloresce(izzy, yoko)\n\nforall x (Rolling(x) -> Effloresce(x, yoko)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The sherwynd imbed the veronica. The sherwynd imbed the ulberto. The sherwynd calculate the veronica. The sherwynd is unavailing. The sherwynd is unheated. The sherwynd estivate the ulberto. The veronica imbed the ulberto. The veronica is unavailing. The veronica is unheated. The veronica is italian. The veronica is nugatory. The veronica estivate the ulberto. The ulberto is variolic. The ulberto estivate the sherwynd. The ulberto estivate the veronica. If someone calculate the veronica and the veronica is italian then the veronica estivate the sherwynd. If someone is italian then they chase the veronica. If someone calculate the ulberto and they chase the sherwynd then the sherwynd is variolic. If someone is italian then they eat the veronica. If someone estivate the sherwynd then they eat the ulberto. If the ulberto calculate the veronica and the ulberto estivate the sherwynd then the ulberto imbed the sherwynd. If someone is unheated and they visit the sherwynd then the sherwynd is nugatory. If someone is variolic then they chase the sherwynd. The sherwynd calculate the ulberto.", "logic": "\nImbed(sherwynd, veronica)\nImbed(sherwynd, ulberto)\nCalculate(sherwynd, veronica)\nUnavailing(sherwynd)\nUnheated(sherwynd)\nEstivate(sherwynd, ulberto)\nImbed(veronica, ulberto)\nUnavailing(veronica)\nUnheated(veronica)\nItalian(veronica)\nNugatory(veronica)\nEstivate(veronica, ulberto)\nVariolic(ulberto)\nEstivate(ulberto, sherwynd)\nEstivate(ulberto, veronica)\nforall x (Calculate(x, veronica) and Italian(veronica) -> Estivate(veronica, sherwynd))\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Imbed(x, veronica))\nforall x (Calculate(x, ulberto) and Imbed(x, sherwynd) -> Variolic(sherwynd))\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Calculate(x, veronica))\nforall x (Estivate(x, sherwynd) -> Calculate(x, ulberto))\nCalculate(ulberto, veronica) and Estivate(ulberto, sherwynd) -> Imbed(ulberto, sherwynd)\nforall x (Unheated(x) and Estivate(x, sherwynd) -> Nugatory(sherwynd))\nforall x (Variolic(x) -> Imbed(x, sherwynd))\n\nCalculate(sherwynd, ulberto)\n\nforall x (Estivate(x, sherwynd) -> Calculate(x, ulberto)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The glen hymn the eustace. The glen hymn the marielle. The glen suspend the eustace. The glen is moire. The glen is brimfull. The glen overawe the marielle. The eustace hymn the marielle. The eustace is moire. The eustace is brimfull. The eustace is immaterial. The eustace is deboned. The eustace overawe the marielle. The marielle is procedural. The marielle overawe the glen. The marielle overawe the eustace. If someone suspend the eustace and the eustace is immaterial then the eustace overawe the glen. If someone is immaterial then they chase the eustace. If someone suspend the marielle and they chase the glen then the glen is procedural. If someone is immaterial then they eat the eustace. If someone overawe the glen then they eat the marielle. If the marielle suspend the eustace and the marielle overawe the glen then the marielle hymn the glen. If someone is brimfull and they visit the glen then the glen is deboned. If someone is procedural then they chase the glen. The marielle is not immaterial.", "logic": "\nHymn(glen, eustace)\nHymn(glen, marielle)\nSuspend(glen, eustace)\nMoire(glen)\nBrimfull(glen)\nOverawe(glen, marielle)\nHymn(eustace, marielle)\nMoire(eustace)\nBrimfull(eustace)\nImmaterial(eustace)\nDeboned(eustace)\nOverawe(eustace, marielle)\nProcedural(marielle)\nOverawe(marielle, glen)\nOverawe(marielle, eustace)\nforall x (Suspend(x, eustace) and Immaterial(eustace) -> Overawe(eustace, glen))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Hymn(x, eustace))\nforall x (Suspend(x, marielle) and Hymn(x, glen) -> Procedural(glen))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Suspend(x, eustace))\nforall x (Overawe(x, glen) -> Suspend(x, marielle))\nSuspend(marielle, eustace) and Overawe(marielle, glen) -> Hymn(marielle, glen)\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Overawe(x, glen) -> Deboned(glen))\nforall x (Procedural(x) -> Hymn(x, glen))\n\nnot Immaterial(marielle)\n\nnot Immaterial(marielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The shanon manicure the antonin. The shanon manicure the sylvester. The shanon intrench the antonin. The shanon is atomic. The shanon is deceased. The shanon cicatrize the sylvester. The antonin manicure the sylvester. The antonin is atomic. The antonin is deceased. The antonin is actuating. The antonin is tricky. The antonin cicatrize the sylvester. The sylvester is ivied. The sylvester cicatrize the shanon. The sylvester cicatrize the antonin. If someone intrench the antonin and the antonin is actuating then the antonin cicatrize the shanon. If someone is actuating then they chase the antonin. If someone intrench the sylvester and they chase the shanon then the shanon is ivied. If someone is actuating then they eat the antonin. If someone cicatrize the shanon then they eat the sylvester. If the sylvester intrench the antonin and the sylvester cicatrize the shanon then the sylvester manicure the shanon. If someone is deceased and they visit the shanon then the shanon is tricky. If someone is ivied then they chase the shanon. The sylvester cicatrize the sylvester.", "logic": "\nManicure(shanon, antonin)\nManicure(shanon, sylvester)\nIntrench(shanon, antonin)\nAtomic(shanon)\nDeceased(shanon)\nCicatrize(shanon, sylvester)\nManicure(antonin, sylvester)\nAtomic(antonin)\nDeceased(antonin)\nActuating(antonin)\nTricky(antonin)\nCicatrize(antonin, sylvester)\nIvied(sylvester)\nCicatrize(sylvester, shanon)\nCicatrize(sylvester, antonin)\nforall x (Intrench(x, antonin) and Actuating(antonin) -> Cicatrize(antonin, shanon))\nforall x (Actuating(x) -> Manicure(x, antonin))\nforall x (Intrench(x, sylvester) and Manicure(x, shanon) -> Ivied(shanon))\nforall x (Actuating(x) -> Intrench(x, antonin))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, shanon) -> Intrench(x, sylvester))\nIntrench(sylvester, antonin) and Cicatrize(sylvester, shanon) -> Manicure(sylvester, shanon)\nforall x (Deceased(x) and Cicatrize(x, shanon) -> Tricky(shanon))\nforall x (Ivied(x) -> Manicure(x, shanon))\n\nCicatrize(sylvester, sylvester)\n\nCicatrize(sylvester, sylvester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The kathlin read the binnie. The kathlin read the skye. The kathlin arbitrate the binnie. The kathlin is remorseful. The kathlin is pontifical. The kathlin undermine the skye. The binnie read the skye. The binnie is remorseful. The binnie is pontifical. The binnie is depressed. The binnie is notched. The binnie undermine the skye. The skye is mantic. The skye undermine the kathlin. The skye undermine the binnie. If someone arbitrate the binnie and the binnie is depressed then the binnie undermine the kathlin. If someone is depressed then they chase the binnie. If someone arbitrate the skye and they chase the kathlin then the kathlin is mantic. If someone is depressed then they eat the binnie. If someone undermine the kathlin then they eat the skye. If the skye arbitrate the binnie and the skye undermine the kathlin then the skye read the kathlin. If someone is pontifical and they visit the kathlin then the kathlin is notched. If someone is mantic then they chase the kathlin. The binnie is not mantic.", "logic": "\nRead(kathlin, binnie)\nRead(kathlin, skye)\nArbitrate(kathlin, binnie)\nRemorseful(kathlin)\nPontifical(kathlin)\nUndermine(kathlin, skye)\nRead(binnie, skye)\nRemorseful(binnie)\nPontifical(binnie)\nDepressed(binnie)\nNotched(binnie)\nUndermine(binnie, skye)\nMantic(skye)\nUndermine(skye, kathlin)\nUndermine(skye, binnie)\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, binnie) and Depressed(binnie) -> Undermine(binnie, kathlin))\nforall x (Depressed(x) -> Read(x, binnie))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, skye) and Read(x, kathlin) -> Mantic(kathlin))\nforall x (Depressed(x) -> Arbitrate(x, binnie))\nforall x (Undermine(x, kathlin) -> Arbitrate(x, skye))\nArbitrate(skye, binnie) and Undermine(skye, kathlin) -> Read(skye, kathlin)\nforall x (Pontifical(x) and Undermine(x, kathlin) -> Notched(kathlin))\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Read(x, kathlin))\n\nnot Mantic(binnie)\n\nnot Mantic(binnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "The bird embed the shandra. The bird embed the luci. The bird tense the shandra. The bird is astomatous. The bird is minatory. The bird ostracize the luci. The shandra embed the luci. The shandra is astomatous. The shandra is minatory. The shandra is mensural. The shandra is agential. The shandra ostracize the luci. The luci is downstream. The luci ostracize the bird. The luci ostracize the shandra. If someone tense the shandra and the shandra is mensural then the shandra ostracize the bird. If someone is mensural then they chase the shandra. If someone tense the luci and they chase the bird then the bird is downstream. If someone is mensural then they eat the shandra. If someone ostracize the bird then they eat the luci. If the luci tense the shandra and the luci ostracize the bird then the luci embed the bird. If someone is minatory and they visit the bird then the bird is agential. If someone is downstream then they chase the bird. The shandra tense the bird.", "logic": "\nEmbed(bird, shandra)\nEmbed(bird, luci)\nTense(bird, shandra)\nAstomatous(bird)\nMinatory(bird)\nOstracize(bird, luci)\nEmbed(shandra, luci)\nAstomatous(shandra)\nMinatory(shandra)\nMensural(shandra)\nAgential(shandra)\nOstracize(shandra, luci)\nDownstream(luci)\nOstracize(luci, bird)\nOstracize(luci, shandra)\nforall x (Tense(x, shandra) and Mensural(shandra) -> Ostracize(shandra, bird))\nforall x (Mensural(x) -> Embed(x, shandra))\nforall x (Tense(x, luci) and Embed(x, bird) -> Downstream(bird))\nforall x (Mensural(x) -> Tense(x, shandra))\nforall x (Ostracize(x, bird) -> Tense(x, luci))\nTense(luci, shandra) and Ostracize(luci, bird) -> Embed(luci, bird)\nforall x (Minatory(x) and Ostracize(x, bird) -> Agential(bird))\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> Embed(x, bird))\n\nTense(shandra, bird)\n\nTense(shandra, bird) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Josie is sudorific. Ingeborg is undeserved. Karia is unwilled. Kirsti is sudorific. Green things are acapnic. All mensurable, sudorific things are lustful. Big things are undeserved. If something is mensurable then it is sudorific. Nice, frontal things are undeserved. Nice things are frontal. Karia is unwilled.", "logic": "\nSudorific(josie)\nUndeserved(ingeborg)\nUnwilled(karia)\nSudorific(kirsti)\nforall x (Undeserved(x) -> Acapnic(x))\nforall x (Mensurable(x) and Sudorific(x) -> Lustful(x))\nforall x (Lustful(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Mensurable(x) -> Sudorific(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and Frontal(x) -> Undeserved(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) -> Frontal(x))\n\nUnwilled(karia)\n\ntherefore Unwilled(karia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Katrina is direct. Della is cormose. Therese is easterly. Chauncey is direct. Green things are quintuple. All sliding, direct things are mulish. Big things are cormose. If something is sliding then it is direct. Nice, poetical things are cormose. Nice things are poetical. Chauncey is not direct.", "logic": "\nDirect(katrina)\nCormose(della)\nEasterly(therese)\nDirect(chauncey)\nforall x (Cormose(x) -> Quintuple(x))\nforall x (Sliding(x) and Direct(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) -> Cormose(x))\nforall x (Sliding(x) -> Direct(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) and Poetical(x) -> Cormose(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) -> Poetical(x))\n\nnot Direct(chauncey)\n\ntherefore Direct(chauncey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "William is turbinate. Robbie is capitalist. Alfie is euclidian. Jorrie is turbinate. Green things are effortful. All columnlike, turbinate things are ritenuto. Big things are capitalist. If something is columnlike then it is turbinate. Nice, unabated things are capitalist. Nice things are unabated. Alfie is unabated.", "logic": "\nTurbinate(william)\nCapitalist(robbie)\nEuclidian(alfie)\nTurbinate(jorrie)\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Effortful(x))\nforall x (Columnlike(x) and Turbinate(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Columnlike(x) -> Turbinate(x))\nforall x (Euclidian(x) and Unabated(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Euclidian(x) -> Unabated(x))\n\nUnabated(alfie)\n\nEuclidian(alfie) and forall x (Euclidian(x) -> Unabated(x)) -> therefore Unabated(alfie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Kalman is empowered. Vanda is pudendal. Julissa is sensible. Gussie is empowered. Green things are saintlike. All idempotent, empowered things are mechanic. Big things are pudendal. If something is idempotent then it is empowered. Nice, plural things are pudendal. Nice things are plural. Vanda is not saintlike.", "logic": "\nEmpowered(kalman)\nPudendal(vanda)\nSensible(julissa)\nEmpowered(gussie)\nforall x (Pudendal(x) -> Saintlike(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) and Empowered(x) -> Mechanic(x))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) -> Pudendal(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) -> Empowered(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) and Plural(x) -> Pudendal(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> Plural(x))\n\nnot Saintlike(vanda)\n\nPudendal(vanda) and forall x (Pudendal(x) -> Saintlike(x)) -> therefore Saintlike(vanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Waite is aperiodic. Janice is edentulate. Wilson is wideband. Goldia is aperiodic. Green things are flavorful. All uncoupled, aperiodic things are lactic. Big things are edentulate. If something is uncoupled then it is aperiodic. Nice, unfounded things are edentulate. Nice things are unfounded. Wilson is edentulate.", "logic": "\nAperiodic(waite)\nEdentulate(janice)\nWideband(wilson)\nAperiodic(goldia)\nforall x (Edentulate(x) -> Flavorful(x))\nforall x (Uncoupled(x) and Aperiodic(x) -> Lactic(x))\nforall x (Lactic(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nforall x (Uncoupled(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Wideband(x) and Unfounded(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nforall x (Wideband(x) -> Unfounded(x))\n\nEdentulate(wilson)\n\nWideband(wilson) and forall x (Wideband(x) -> Unfounded(x)) -> therefore Unfounded(wilson) Wideband(wilson) and Unfounded(wilson) and forall x (Wideband(x) and Unfounded(x) -> Edentulate(x)) -> therefore Edentulate(wilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Emmalyn is scanty. Blake is concealing. Cobby is lxxi. Estelle is scanty. Green things are granitic. All malformed, scanty things are savourless. Big things are concealing. If something is malformed then it is scanty. Nice, eupnoeic things are concealing. Nice things are eupnoeic. Cobby is not concealing.", "logic": "\nScanty(emmalyn)\nConcealing(blake)\nLxxi(cobby)\nScanty(estelle)\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Malformed(x) and Scanty(x) -> Savourless(x))\nforall x (Savourless(x) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Malformed(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) and Eupnoeic(x) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) -> Eupnoeic(x))\n\nnot Concealing(cobby)\n\nLxxi(cobby) and forall x (Lxxi(x) -> Eupnoeic(x)) -> therefore Eupnoeic(cobby) Lxxi(cobby) and Eupnoeic(cobby) and forall x (Lxxi(x) and Eupnoeic(x) -> Concealing(x)) -> therefore Concealing(cobby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Beatrisa is albinistic. Candida is light. Zuzana is genetic. Consuela is albinistic. Green things are unshadowed. All mythical, albinistic things are untouched. Big things are light. If something is mythical then it is albinistic. Nice, subdued things are light. Nice things are subdued. Zuzana is unshadowed.", "logic": "\nAlbinistic(beatrisa)\nLight(candida)\nGenetic(zuzana)\nAlbinistic(consuela)\nforall x (Light(x) -> Unshadowed(x))\nforall x (Mythical(x) and Albinistic(x) -> Untouched(x))\nforall x (Untouched(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Mythical(x) -> Albinistic(x))\nforall x (Genetic(x) and Subdued(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Genetic(x) -> Subdued(x))\n\nUnshadowed(zuzana)\n\nGenetic(zuzana) and forall x (Genetic(x) -> Subdued(x)) -> therefore Subdued(zuzana) Genetic(zuzana) and Subdued(zuzana) and forall x (Genetic(x) and Subdued(x) -> Light(x)) -> therefore Light(zuzana) Light(zuzana) and forall x (Light(x) -> Unshadowed(x)) -> therefore Unshadowed(zuzana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Jeralee is pink. Gae is urban. Courtney is equipt. Theo is pink. Green things are occlusive. All indurate, pink things are geodesic. Big things are urban. If something is indurate then it is pink. Nice, cuddlesome things are urban. Nice things are cuddlesome. Courtney is not occlusive.", "logic": "\nPink(jeralee)\nUrban(gae)\nEquipt(courtney)\nPink(theo)\nforall x (Urban(x) -> Occlusive(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Pink(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Urban(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) -> Pink(x))\nforall x (Equipt(x) and Cuddlesome(x) -> Urban(x))\nforall x (Equipt(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\n\nnot Occlusive(courtney)\n\nEquipt(courtney) and forall x (Equipt(x) -> Cuddlesome(x)) -> therefore Cuddlesome(courtney) Equipt(courtney) and Cuddlesome(courtney) and forall x (Equipt(x) and Cuddlesome(x) -> Urban(x)) -> therefore Urban(courtney) Urban(courtney) and forall x (Urban(x) -> Occlusive(x)) -> therefore Occlusive(courtney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Siana is excitable. Veda is rhombic. Rissa is cetacean. Noellyn is excitable. Green things are aweigh. All nonfissile, excitable things are polyploid. Big things are rhombic. If something is nonfissile then it is excitable. Nice, overgreedy things are rhombic. Nice things are overgreedy. Noellyn is not polyploid.", "logic": "\nExcitable(siana)\nRhombic(veda)\nCetacean(rissa)\nExcitable(noellyn)\nforall x (Rhombic(x) -> Aweigh(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) and Excitable(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Polyploid(x) -> Rhombic(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Excitable(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) and Overgreedy(x) -> Rhombic(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) -> Overgreedy(x))\n\nnot Polyploid(noellyn)\n\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) and Excitable(x) -> Polyploid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Christoph is heedless. Aline is fusiform. Shaylah is underway. Donetta is heedless. Green things are hipless. All unspaced, heedless things are sybaritic. Big things are fusiform. If something is unspaced then it is heedless. Nice, xxxii things are fusiform. Nice things are xxxii. Donetta is xxxii.", "logic": "\nHeedless(christoph)\nFusiform(aline)\nUnderway(shaylah)\nHeedless(donetta)\nforall x (Fusiform(x) -> Hipless(x))\nforall x (Unspaced(x) and Heedless(x) -> Sybaritic(x))\nforall x (Sybaritic(x) -> Fusiform(x))\nforall x (Unspaced(x) -> Heedless(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) and Xxxii(x) -> Fusiform(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Xxxii(x))\n\nXxxii(donetta)\n\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Xxxii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Emmalynn is callable. Norri is accusive. Betteann is modernised. Sib is callable. Green things are fuddled. All fain, callable things are recusant. Big things are accusive. If something is fain then it is callable. Nice, hellish things are accusive. Nice things are hellish. Norri is not recusant.", "logic": "\nCallable(emmalynn)\nAccusive(norri)\nModernised(betteann)\nCallable(sib)\nforall x (Accusive(x) -> Fuddled(x))\nforall x (Fain(x) and Callable(x) -> Recusant(x))\nforall x (Recusant(x) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Fain(x) -> Callable(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) and Hellish(x) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> Hellish(x))\n\nnot Recusant(norri)\n\nforall x (Fain(x) and Callable(x) -> Recusant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Amy is baritone. Norah is springlike. Robinet is unreached. Vernon is baritone. Green things are forceless. All antique, baritone things are salvadoran. Big things are springlike. If something is antique then it is baritone. Nice, hoggish things are springlike. Nice things are hoggish. Vernon is springlike.", "logic": "\nBaritone(amy)\nSpringlike(norah)\nUnreached(robinet)\nBaritone(vernon)\nforall x (Springlike(x) -> Forceless(x))\nforall x (Antique(x) and Baritone(x) -> Salvadoran(x))\nforall x (Salvadoran(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Antique(x) -> Baritone(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and Hoggish(x) -> Springlike(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) -> Hoggish(x))\n\nSpringlike(vernon)\n\nforall x (Salvadoran(x) -> Springlike(x)) <- forall x (Antique(x) and Baritone(x) -> Salvadoran(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Ashby is auxetic. Myke is more. Nessie is pyrogallic. Karleen is auxetic. Green things are madagascan. All aplanatic, auxetic things are mobbish. Big things are more. If something is aplanatic then it is auxetic. Nice, moraceous things are more. Nice things are moraceous. Ashby is not aplanatic.", "logic": "\nAuxetic(ashby)\nMore(myke)\nPyrogallic(nessie)\nAuxetic(karleen)\nforall x (More(x) -> Madagascan(x))\nforall x (Aplanatic(x) and Auxetic(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) -> More(x))\nforall x (Aplanatic(x) -> Auxetic(x))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) and Moraceous(x) -> More(x))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) -> Moraceous(x))\n\nnot Aplanatic(ashby)\n\nnot Aplanatic(ashby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Willdon is heedful. Annamari is unenclosed. Engelbert is knowing. Roby is heedful. Green things are cheesy. All nonfatal, heedful things are baboonish. Big things are unenclosed. If something is nonfatal then it is heedful. Nice, suspensive things are unenclosed. Nice things are suspensive. Roby is knowing.", "logic": "\nHeedful(willdon)\nUnenclosed(annamari)\nKnowing(engelbert)\nHeedful(roby)\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) -> Cheesy(x))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) and Heedful(x) -> Baboonish(x))\nforall x (Baboonish(x) -> Unenclosed(x))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) -> Heedful(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) and Suspensive(x) -> Unenclosed(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Suspensive(x))\n\nKnowing(roby)\n\nKnowing(roby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Margery is colored. Chad is shaven. Chickie is encrusted. Sherri is colored. Green things are xliii. All sedentary, colored things are spidery. Big things are shaven. If something is sedentary then it is colored. Nice, haemic things are shaven. Nice things are haemic. Chad is not sedentary.", "logic": "\nColored(margery)\nShaven(chad)\nEncrusted(chickie)\nColored(sherri)\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Xliii(x))\nforall x (Sedentary(x) and Colored(x) -> Spidery(x))\nforall x (Spidery(x) -> Shaven(x))\nforall x (Sedentary(x) -> Colored(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and Haemic(x) -> Shaven(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> Haemic(x))\n\nnot Sedentary(chad)\n\nnot Sedentary(chad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "Laney is requisite. Garvin is dependent. Tandy is tiresome. Moe is requisite. Green things are waxen. All shallow, requisite things are masterless. Big things are dependent. If something is shallow then it is requisite. Nice, oratorical things are dependent. Nice things are oratorical. Garvin is tiresome.", "logic": "\nRequisite(laney)\nDependent(garvin)\nTiresome(tandy)\nRequisite(moe)\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Waxen(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Requisite(x) -> Masterless(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) and Oratorical(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) -> Oratorical(x))\n\nTiresome(garvin)\n\nTiresome(garvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1713"} {"premises": "The sibylle palsy the yovonnda. The sibylle voice the yovonnda. The yovonnda voice the sibylle. If someone is vexing then they like the yovonnda. If someone is offending then they eat the sibylle. If someone voice the yovonnda then the yovonnda is vexing. If someone voice the yovonnda and they are penetrable then the yovonnda reforge the sibylle. If someone palsy the yovonnda then they are offending. If the yovonnda reforge the sibylle and the sibylle is not masterly then the sibylle is offending. If someone palsy the sibylle then they visit the sibylle. If the yovonnda is offending then the yovonnda voice the sibylle. The sibylle palsy the yovonnda.", "logic": "\nPalsy(sibylle, yovonnda)\nVoice(sibylle, yovonnda)\nVoice(yovonnda, sibylle)\nforall x (Vexing(x) -> Voice(x, yovonnda))\nforall x (Offending(x) -> Palsy(x, sibylle))\nforall x (Voice(x, yovonnda) -> Vexing(yovonnda))\nforall x (Voice(x, yovonnda) and Penetrable(x) -> Reforge(yovonnda, sibylle))\nforall x (Palsy(x, yovonnda) -> Offending(x))\nReforge(yovonnda, sibylle) and not Masterly(sibylle) -> Offending(sibylle)\nforall x (Palsy(x, sibylle) -> Reforge(x, sibylle))\nOffending(yovonnda) -> Voice(yovonnda, sibylle)\n\nPalsy(sibylle, yovonnda)\n\ntherefore Palsy(sibylle, yovonnda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The isabella grate the lacey. The isabella lull the lacey. The lacey lull the isabella. If someone is undeclared then they like the lacey. If someone is disparate then they eat the isabella. If someone lull the lacey then the lacey is undeclared. If someone lull the lacey and they are rose then the lacey secrete the isabella. If someone grate the lacey then they are disparate. If the lacey secrete the isabella and the isabella is not debile then the isabella is disparate. If someone grate the isabella then they visit the isabella. If the lacey is disparate then the lacey lull the isabella. The lacey does not like the isabella.", "logic": "\nGrate(isabella, lacey)\nLull(isabella, lacey)\nLull(lacey, isabella)\nforall x (Undeclared(x) -> Lull(x, lacey))\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Grate(x, isabella))\nforall x (Lull(x, lacey) -> Undeclared(lacey))\nforall x (Lull(x, lacey) and Rose(x) -> Secrete(lacey, isabella))\nforall x (Grate(x, lacey) -> Disparate(x))\nSecrete(lacey, isabella) and not Debile(isabella) -> Disparate(isabella)\nforall x (Grate(x, isabella) -> Secrete(x, isabella))\nDisparate(lacey) -> Lull(lacey, isabella)\n\nnot Lull(lacey, isabella)\n\ntherefore Lull(lacey, isabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The tressa clone the bambi. The tressa retry the bambi. The bambi retry the tressa. If someone is dorian then they like the bambi. If someone is nocent then they eat the tressa. If someone retry the bambi then the bambi is dorian. If someone retry the bambi and they are cathectic then the bambi gentle the tressa. If someone clone the bambi then they are nocent. If the bambi gentle the tressa and the tressa is not drowsy then the tressa is nocent. If someone clone the tressa then they visit the tressa. If the bambi is nocent then the bambi retry the tressa. The tressa is nocent.", "logic": "\nClone(tressa, bambi)\nRetry(tressa, bambi)\nRetry(bambi, tressa)\nforall x (Dorian(x) -> Retry(x, bambi))\nforall x (Nocent(x) -> Clone(x, tressa))\nforall x (Retry(x, bambi) -> Dorian(bambi))\nforall x (Retry(x, bambi) and Cathectic(x) -> Gentle(bambi, tressa))\nforall x (Clone(x, bambi) -> Nocent(x))\nGentle(bambi, tressa) and not Drowsy(tressa) -> Nocent(tressa)\nforall x (Clone(x, tressa) -> Gentle(x, tressa))\nNocent(bambi) -> Retry(bambi, tressa)\n\nNocent(tressa)\n\nClone(tressa, bambi) and forall x (Clone(x, bambi) -> Nocent(x)) -> therefore Nocent(tressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The marleen poleaxe the leon. The marleen unspell the leon. The leon unspell the marleen. If someone is overhasty then they like the leon. If someone is dickensian then they eat the marleen. If someone unspell the leon then the leon is overhasty. If someone unspell the leon and they are pelecypod then the leon awake the marleen. If someone poleaxe the leon then they are dickensian. If the leon awake the marleen and the marleen is not painted then the marleen is dickensian. If someone poleaxe the marleen then they visit the marleen. If the leon is dickensian then the leon unspell the marleen. The leon is not overhasty.", "logic": "\nPoleaxe(marleen, leon)\nUnspell(marleen, leon)\nUnspell(leon, marleen)\nforall x (Overhasty(x) -> Unspell(x, leon))\nforall x (Dickensian(x) -> Poleaxe(x, marleen))\nforall x (Unspell(x, leon) -> Overhasty(leon))\nforall x (Unspell(x, leon) and Pelecypod(x) -> Awake(leon, marleen))\nforall x (Poleaxe(x, leon) -> Dickensian(x))\nAwake(leon, marleen) and not Painted(marleen) -> Dickensian(marleen)\nforall x (Poleaxe(x, marleen) -> Awake(x, marleen))\nDickensian(leon) -> Unspell(leon, marleen)\n\nnot Overhasty(leon)\n\nUnspell(marleen, leon) and forall x (Unspell(x, leon) -> Overhasty(leon)) -> therefore Overhasty(leon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The salome endear the yoshiko. The salome ramp the yoshiko. The yoshiko ramp the salome. If someone is verbose then they like the yoshiko. If someone is luxe then they eat the salome. If someone ramp the yoshiko then the yoshiko is verbose. If someone ramp the yoshiko and they are blazing then the yoshiko mount the salome. If someone endear the yoshiko then they are luxe. If the yoshiko mount the salome and the salome is not pussy then the salome is luxe. If someone endear the salome then they visit the salome. If the yoshiko is luxe then the yoshiko ramp the salome. The yoshiko ramp the yoshiko.", "logic": "\nEndear(salome, yoshiko)\nRamp(salome, yoshiko)\nRamp(yoshiko, salome)\nforall x (Verbose(x) -> Ramp(x, yoshiko))\nforall x (Luxe(x) -> Endear(x, salome))\nforall x (Ramp(x, yoshiko) -> Verbose(yoshiko))\nforall x (Ramp(x, yoshiko) and Blazing(x) -> Mount(yoshiko, salome))\nforall x (Endear(x, yoshiko) -> Luxe(x))\nMount(yoshiko, salome) and not Pussy(salome) -> Luxe(salome)\nforall x (Endear(x, salome) -> Mount(x, salome))\nLuxe(yoshiko) -> Ramp(yoshiko, salome)\n\nRamp(yoshiko, yoshiko)\n\nRamp(salome, yoshiko) and forall x (Ramp(x, yoshiko) -> Verbose(yoshiko)) -> therefore Verbose(yoshiko) Verbose(yoshiko) and forall x (Verbose(x) -> Ramp(x, yoshiko)) -> therefore Ramp(yoshiko, yoshiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The marilee engross the matti. The marilee sidetrack the matti. The matti sidetrack the marilee. If someone is sympatric then they like the matti. If someone is unhopeful then they eat the marilee. If someone sidetrack the matti then the matti is sympatric. If someone sidetrack the matti and they are pure then the matti twitch the marilee. If someone engross the matti then they are unhopeful. If the matti twitch the marilee and the marilee is not maxillary then the marilee is unhopeful. If someone engross the marilee then they visit the marilee. If the matti is unhopeful then the matti sidetrack the marilee. The marilee does not eat the marilee.", "logic": "\nEngross(marilee, matti)\nSidetrack(marilee, matti)\nSidetrack(matti, marilee)\nforall x (Sympatric(x) -> Sidetrack(x, matti))\nforall x (Unhopeful(x) -> Engross(x, marilee))\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, matti) -> Sympatric(matti))\nforall x (Sidetrack(x, matti) and Pure(x) -> Twitch(matti, marilee))\nforall x (Engross(x, matti) -> Unhopeful(x))\nTwitch(matti, marilee) and not Maxillary(marilee) -> Unhopeful(marilee)\nforall x (Engross(x, marilee) -> Twitch(x, marilee))\nUnhopeful(matti) -> Sidetrack(matti, marilee)\n\nnot Engross(marilee, marilee)\n\nEngross(marilee, matti) and forall x (Engross(x, matti) -> Unhopeful(x)) -> therefore Unhopeful(marilee) Unhopeful(marilee) and forall x (Unhopeful(x) -> Engross(x, marilee)) -> therefore Engross(marilee, marilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The lionello snigger the phillipp. The lionello resort the phillipp. The phillipp resort the lionello. If someone is slatey then they like the phillipp. If someone is mesial then they eat the lionello. If someone resort the phillipp then the phillipp is slatey. If someone resort the phillipp and they are more then the phillipp inhibit the lionello. If someone snigger the phillipp then they are mesial. If the phillipp inhibit the lionello and the lionello is not leprose then the lionello is mesial. If someone snigger the lionello then they visit the lionello. If the phillipp is mesial then the phillipp resort the lionello. The lionello inhibit the lionello.", "logic": "\nSnigger(lionello, phillipp)\nResort(lionello, phillipp)\nResort(phillipp, lionello)\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Resort(x, phillipp))\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> Snigger(x, lionello))\nforall x (Resort(x, phillipp) -> Slatey(phillipp))\nforall x (Resort(x, phillipp) and More(x) -> Inhibit(phillipp, lionello))\nforall x (Snigger(x, phillipp) -> Mesial(x))\nInhibit(phillipp, lionello) and not Leprose(lionello) -> Mesial(lionello)\nforall x (Snigger(x, lionello) -> Inhibit(x, lionello))\nMesial(phillipp) -> Resort(phillipp, lionello)\n\nInhibit(lionello, lionello)\n\nSnigger(lionello, phillipp) and forall x (Snigger(x, phillipp) -> Mesial(x)) -> therefore Mesial(lionello) Mesial(lionello) and forall x (Mesial(x) -> Snigger(x, lionello)) -> therefore Snigger(lionello, lionello) Snigger(lionello, lionello) and forall x (Snigger(x, lionello) -> Inhibit(x, lionello)) -> therefore Inhibit(lionello, lionello)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The marquita cure the kakalina. The marquita resist the kakalina. The kakalina resist the marquita. If someone is healthful then they like the kakalina. If someone is swiss then they eat the marquita. If someone resist the kakalina then the kakalina is healthful. If someone resist the kakalina and they are starry then the kakalina bean the marquita. If someone cure the kakalina then they are swiss. If the kakalina bean the marquita and the marquita is not incautious then the marquita is swiss. If someone cure the marquita then they visit the marquita. If the kakalina is swiss then the kakalina resist the marquita. The marquita does not visit the marquita.", "logic": "\nCure(marquita, kakalina)\nResist(marquita, kakalina)\nResist(kakalina, marquita)\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Resist(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Swiss(x) -> Cure(x, marquita))\nforall x (Resist(x, kakalina) -> Healthful(kakalina))\nforall x (Resist(x, kakalina) and Starry(x) -> Bean(kakalina, marquita))\nforall x (Cure(x, kakalina) -> Swiss(x))\nBean(kakalina, marquita) and not Incautious(marquita) -> Swiss(marquita)\nforall x (Cure(x, marquita) -> Bean(x, marquita))\nSwiss(kakalina) -> Resist(kakalina, marquita)\n\nnot Bean(marquita, marquita)\n\nCure(marquita, kakalina) and forall x (Cure(x, kakalina) -> Swiss(x)) -> therefore Swiss(marquita) Swiss(marquita) and forall x (Swiss(x) -> Cure(x, marquita)) -> therefore Cure(marquita, marquita) Cure(marquita, marquita) and forall x (Cure(x, marquita) -> Bean(x, marquita)) -> therefore Bean(marquita, marquita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The mitchell trisect the isabelle. The mitchell novate the isabelle. The isabelle novate the mitchell. If someone is necklike then they like the isabelle. If someone is covariant then they eat the mitchell. If someone novate the isabelle then the isabelle is necklike. If someone novate the isabelle and they are racy then the isabelle tinct the mitchell. If someone trisect the isabelle then they are covariant. If the isabelle tinct the mitchell and the mitchell is not farfetched then the mitchell is covariant. If someone trisect the mitchell then they visit the mitchell. If the isabelle is covariant then the isabelle novate the mitchell. The isabelle is not covariant.", "logic": "\nTrisect(mitchell, isabelle)\nNovate(mitchell, isabelle)\nNovate(isabelle, mitchell)\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Novate(x, isabelle))\nforall x (Covariant(x) -> Trisect(x, mitchell))\nforall x (Novate(x, isabelle) -> Necklike(isabelle))\nforall x (Novate(x, isabelle) and Racy(x) -> Tinct(isabelle, mitchell))\nforall x (Trisect(x, isabelle) -> Covariant(x))\nTinct(isabelle, mitchell) and not Farfetched(mitchell) -> Covariant(mitchell)\nforall x (Trisect(x, mitchell) -> Tinct(x, mitchell))\nCovariant(isabelle) -> Novate(isabelle, mitchell)\n\nnot Covariant(isabelle)\n\nforall x (Trisect(x, isabelle) -> Covariant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The ora utter the englebart. The ora garble the englebart. The englebart garble the ora. If someone is tasseled then they like the englebart. If someone is battleful then they eat the ora. If someone garble the englebart then the englebart is tasseled. If someone garble the englebart and they are slashed then the englebart establish the ora. If someone utter the englebart then they are battleful. If the englebart establish the ora and the ora is not burmese then the ora is battleful. If someone utter the ora then they visit the ora. If the englebart is battleful then the englebart garble the ora. The englebart utter the ora.", "logic": "\nUtter(ora, englebart)\nGarble(ora, englebart)\nGarble(englebart, ora)\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> Garble(x, englebart))\nforall x (Battleful(x) -> Utter(x, ora))\nforall x (Garble(x, englebart) -> Tasseled(englebart))\nforall x (Garble(x, englebart) and Slashed(x) -> Establish(englebart, ora))\nforall x (Utter(x, englebart) -> Battleful(x))\nEstablish(englebart, ora) and not Burmese(ora) -> Battleful(ora)\nforall x (Utter(x, ora) -> Establish(x, ora))\nBattleful(englebart) -> Garble(englebart, ora)\n\nUtter(englebart, ora)\n\nforall x (Battleful(x) -> Utter(x, ora)) <- forall x (Utter(x, englebart) -> Battleful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The cherey relativise the matilde. The cherey risk the matilde. The matilde risk the cherey. If someone is roundish then they like the matilde. If someone is truant then they eat the cherey. If someone risk the matilde then the matilde is roundish. If someone risk the matilde and they are soppy then the matilde lock the cherey. If someone relativise the matilde then they are truant. If the matilde lock the cherey and the cherey is not cadaverous then the cherey is truant. If someone relativise the cherey then they visit the cherey. If the matilde is truant then the matilde risk the cherey. The matilde does not visit the cherey.", "logic": "\nRelativise(cherey, matilde)\nRisk(cherey, matilde)\nRisk(matilde, cherey)\nforall x (Roundish(x) -> Risk(x, matilde))\nforall x (Truant(x) -> Relativise(x, cherey))\nforall x (Risk(x, matilde) -> Roundish(matilde))\nforall x (Risk(x, matilde) and Soppy(x) -> Lock(matilde, cherey))\nforall x (Relativise(x, matilde) -> Truant(x))\nLock(matilde, cherey) and not Cadaverous(cherey) -> Truant(cherey)\nforall x (Relativise(x, cherey) -> Lock(x, cherey))\nTruant(matilde) -> Risk(matilde, cherey)\n\nnot Lock(matilde, cherey)\n\nforall x (Relativise(x, cherey) -> Lock(x, cherey)) <- forall x (Truant(x) -> Relativise(x, cherey)) <- forall x (Relativise(x, matilde) -> Truant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The julita inspissate the carmelina. The julita forbear the carmelina. The carmelina forbear the julita. If someone is dubitable then they like the carmelina. If someone is verbalised then they eat the julita. If someone forbear the carmelina then the carmelina is dubitable. If someone forbear the carmelina and they are earned then the carmelina ruggedize the julita. If someone inspissate the carmelina then they are verbalised. If the carmelina ruggedize the julita and the julita is not bedridden then the julita is verbalised. If someone inspissate the julita then they visit the julita. If the carmelina is verbalised then the carmelina forbear the julita. The julita forbear the julita.", "logic": "\nInspissate(julita, carmelina)\nForbear(julita, carmelina)\nForbear(carmelina, julita)\nforall x (Dubitable(x) -> Forbear(x, carmelina))\nforall x (Verbalised(x) -> Inspissate(x, julita))\nforall x (Forbear(x, carmelina) -> Dubitable(carmelina))\nforall x (Forbear(x, carmelina) and Earned(x) -> Ruggedize(carmelina, julita))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, carmelina) -> Verbalised(x))\nRuggedize(carmelina, julita) and not Bedridden(julita) -> Verbalised(julita)\nforall x (Inspissate(x, julita) -> Ruggedize(x, julita))\nVerbalised(carmelina) -> Forbear(carmelina, julita)\n\nForbear(julita, julita)\n\nForbear(julita, julita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The katherina impregnate the tera. The katherina opalise the tera. The tera opalise the katherina. If someone is olfactory then they like the tera. If someone is unbounded then they eat the katherina. If someone opalise the tera then the tera is olfactory. If someone opalise the tera and they are chambered then the tera need the katherina. If someone impregnate the tera then they are unbounded. If the tera need the katherina and the katherina is not nosey then the katherina is unbounded. If someone impregnate the katherina then they visit the katherina. If the tera is unbounded then the tera opalise the katherina. The katherina is not nosey.", "logic": "\nImpregnate(katherina, tera)\nOpalise(katherina, tera)\nOpalise(tera, katherina)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) -> Opalise(x, tera))\nforall x (Unbounded(x) -> Impregnate(x, katherina))\nforall x (Opalise(x, tera) -> Olfactory(tera))\nforall x (Opalise(x, tera) and Chambered(x) -> Need(tera, katherina))\nforall x (Impregnate(x, tera) -> Unbounded(x))\nNeed(tera, katherina) and not Nosey(katherina) -> Unbounded(katherina)\nforall x (Impregnate(x, katherina) -> Need(x, katherina))\nUnbounded(tera) -> Opalise(tera, katherina)\n\nnot Nosey(katherina)\n\nnot Nosey(katherina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The jenica deviate the gerhard. The jenica daze the gerhard. The gerhard daze the jenica. If someone is emotive then they like the gerhard. If someone is dutiable then they eat the jenica. If someone daze the gerhard then the gerhard is emotive. If someone daze the gerhard and they are squint then the gerhard whet the jenica. If someone deviate the gerhard then they are dutiable. If the gerhard whet the jenica and the jenica is not negotiable then the jenica is dutiable. If someone deviate the jenica then they visit the jenica. If the gerhard is dutiable then the gerhard daze the jenica. The gerhard deviate the gerhard.", "logic": "\nDeviate(jenica, gerhard)\nDaze(jenica, gerhard)\nDaze(gerhard, jenica)\nforall x (Emotive(x) -> Daze(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Dutiable(x) -> Deviate(x, jenica))\nforall x (Daze(x, gerhard) -> Emotive(gerhard))\nforall x (Daze(x, gerhard) and Squint(x) -> Whet(gerhard, jenica))\nforall x (Deviate(x, gerhard) -> Dutiable(x))\nWhet(gerhard, jenica) and not Negotiable(jenica) -> Dutiable(jenica)\nforall x (Deviate(x, jenica) -> Whet(x, jenica))\nDutiable(gerhard) -> Daze(gerhard, jenica)\n\nDeviate(gerhard, gerhard)\n\nDeviate(gerhard, gerhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The anita shack the jabez. The anita sneeze the jabez. The jabez sneeze the anita. If someone is swooning then they like the jabez. If someone is anodyne then they eat the anita. If someone sneeze the jabez then the jabez is swooning. If someone sneeze the jabez and they are modernized then the jabez gallivant the anita. If someone shack the jabez then they are anodyne. If the jabez gallivant the anita and the anita is not filmable then the anita is anodyne. If someone shack the anita then they visit the anita. If the jabez is anodyne then the jabez sneeze the anita. The anita does not visit the jabez.", "logic": "\nShack(anita, jabez)\nSneeze(anita, jabez)\nSneeze(jabez, anita)\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> Sneeze(x, jabez))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Shack(x, anita))\nforall x (Sneeze(x, jabez) -> Swooning(jabez))\nforall x (Sneeze(x, jabez) and Modernized(x) -> Gallivant(jabez, anita))\nforall x (Shack(x, jabez) -> Anodyne(x))\nGallivant(jabez, anita) and not Filmable(anita) -> Anodyne(anita)\nforall x (Shack(x, anita) -> Gallivant(x, anita))\nAnodyne(jabez) -> Sneeze(jabez, anita)\n\nnot Gallivant(anita, jabez)\n\nnot Gallivant(anita, jabez) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "The elbertine implore the tammi. The elbertine lilt the tammi. The tammi lilt the elbertine. If someone is scraggly then they like the tammi. If someone is exonerated then they eat the elbertine. If someone lilt the tammi then the tammi is scraggly. If someone lilt the tammi and they are narrow then the tammi conglobe the elbertine. If someone implore the tammi then they are exonerated. If the tammi conglobe the elbertine and the elbertine is not deciphered then the elbertine is exonerated. If someone implore the elbertine then they visit the elbertine. If the tammi is exonerated then the tammi lilt the elbertine. The elbertine is scraggly.", "logic": "\nImplore(elbertine, tammi)\nLilt(elbertine, tammi)\nLilt(tammi, elbertine)\nforall x (Scraggly(x) -> Lilt(x, tammi))\nforall x (Exonerated(x) -> Implore(x, elbertine))\nforall x (Lilt(x, tammi) -> Scraggly(tammi))\nforall x (Lilt(x, tammi) and Narrow(x) -> Conglobe(tammi, elbertine))\nforall x (Implore(x, tammi) -> Exonerated(x))\nConglobe(tammi, elbertine) and not Deciphered(elbertine) -> Exonerated(elbertine)\nforall x (Implore(x, elbertine) -> Conglobe(x, elbertine))\nExonerated(tammi) -> Lilt(tammi, elbertine)\n\nScraggly(elbertine)\n\nScraggly(elbertine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-778"} {"premises": "Marley is uplifted. Katinka is outdoorsy. Katinka is nonnatural. Katinka is not tannic. Katinka is uplifted. Katinka is neglectful. Katinka is not fiftieth. All fiftieth people are not incautious. If someone is incautious and not fiftieth then they are uplifted. Katinka is uplifted.", "logic": "\nUplifted(marley)\nOutdoorsy(katinka)\nNonnatural(katinka)\nnot Tannic(katinka)\nUplifted(katinka)\nNeglectful(katinka)\nnot Fiftieth(katinka)\nforall x (Fiftieth(x) -> not Incautious(x))\nforall x (Incautious(x) and not Fiftieth(x) -> Uplifted(x))\n\nUplifted(katinka)\n\ntherefore Uplifted(katinka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "Jeniece is catalytic. Bridie is pickled. Bridie is vocal. Bridie is not aleatory. Bridie is catalytic. Bridie is inflowing. Bridie is not sweetheart. All sweetheart people are not argive. If someone is argive and not sweetheart then they are catalytic. Bridie is aleatory.", "logic": "\nCatalytic(jeniece)\nPickled(bridie)\nVocal(bridie)\nnot Aleatory(bridie)\nCatalytic(bridie)\nInflowing(bridie)\nnot Sweetheart(bridie)\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) -> not Argive(x))\nforall x (Argive(x) and not Sweetheart(x) -> Catalytic(x))\n\nAleatory(bridie)\n\ntherefore not Aleatory(bridie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "Steffen is exothermal. Luana is bulbed. Luana is unthought. Luana is not untouched. Luana is exothermal. Luana is leftish. Luana is not leathery. All leathery people are not jewish. If someone is jewish and not leathery then they are exothermal. Steffen is not bulbed.", "logic": "\nExothermal(steffen)\nBulbed(luana)\nUnthought(luana)\nnot Untouched(luana)\nExothermal(luana)\nLeftish(luana)\nnot Leathery(luana)\nforall x (Leathery(x) -> not Jewish(x))\nforall x (Jewish(x) and not Leathery(x) -> Exothermal(x))\n\nnot Bulbed(steffen)\n\nnot Bulbed(steffen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "Kial is despiteful. Brandea is unmannerly. Brandea is processed. Brandea is not cyan. Brandea is despiteful. Brandea is antitoxic. Brandea is not wearied. All wearied people are not healthier. If someone is healthier and not wearied then they are despiteful. Kial is antitoxic.", "logic": "\nDespiteful(kial)\nUnmannerly(brandea)\nProcessed(brandea)\nnot Cyan(brandea)\nDespiteful(brandea)\nAntitoxic(brandea)\nnot Wearied(brandea)\nforall x (Wearied(x) -> not Healthier(x))\nforall x (Healthier(x) and not Wearied(x) -> Despiteful(x))\n\nAntitoxic(kial)\n\nAntitoxic(kial) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "The erinna is turkic. The erinna is laden. The erinna is steadying. The erinna is outmost. The erinna is higher. The erinna italicize the townsend. The erinna withhold the townsend. The townsend is outmost. The townsend meow the erinna. The townsend withhold the erinna. If something is outmost and it italicize the erinna then it is steadying. If the erinna italicize the townsend and the townsend withhold the erinna then the erinna withhold the townsend. If something is outmost then it meow the erinna. If the erinna withhold the townsend and the erinna is outmost then the erinna italicize the townsend. If something italicize the townsend and the townsend is turkic then the townsend meow the erinna. If something is laden and it withhold the erinna then it is steadying. If something withhold the erinna then it italicize the erinna. If something is steadying and it italicize the erinna then the erinna italicize the townsend. The townsend withhold the erinna.", "logic": "\nTurkic(erinna)\nLaden(erinna)\nSteadying(erinna)\nOutmost(erinna)\nHigher(erinna)\nItalicize(erinna, townsend)\nWithhold(erinna, townsend)\nOutmost(townsend)\nMeow(townsend, erinna)\nWithhold(townsend, erinna)\nforall x (Outmost(x) and Italicize(x, erinna) -> Steadying(x))\nItalicize(erinna, townsend) and Withhold(townsend, erinna) -> Withhold(erinna, townsend)\nforall x (Outmost(x) -> Meow(x, erinna))\nWithhold(erinna, townsend) and Outmost(erinna) -> Italicize(erinna, townsend)\nforall x (Italicize(x, townsend) and Turkic(townsend) -> Meow(townsend, erinna))\nforall x (Laden(x) and Withhold(x, erinna) -> Steadying(x))\nforall x (Withhold(x, erinna) -> Italicize(x, erinna))\nforall x (Steadying(x) and Italicize(x, erinna) -> Italicize(erinna, townsend))\n\nWithhold(townsend, erinna)\n\ntherefore Withhold(townsend, erinna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The patsy is stearic. The patsy is barbarous. The patsy is wilsonian. The patsy is civil. The patsy is cutting. The patsy politicise the donal. The patsy condition the donal. The donal is civil. The donal lick the patsy. The donal condition the patsy. If something is civil and it politicise the patsy then it is wilsonian. If the patsy politicise the donal and the donal condition the patsy then the patsy condition the donal. If something is civil then it lick the patsy. If the patsy condition the donal and the patsy is civil then the patsy politicise the donal. If something politicise the donal and the donal is stearic then the donal lick the patsy. If something is barbarous and it condition the patsy then it is wilsonian. If something condition the patsy then it politicise the patsy. If something is wilsonian and it politicise the patsy then the patsy politicise the donal. The patsy does not need the donal.", "logic": "\nStearic(patsy)\nBarbarous(patsy)\nWilsonian(patsy)\nCivil(patsy)\nCutting(patsy)\nPoliticise(patsy, donal)\nCondition(patsy, donal)\nCivil(donal)\nLick(donal, patsy)\nCondition(donal, patsy)\nforall x (Civil(x) and Politicise(x, patsy) -> Wilsonian(x))\nPoliticise(patsy, donal) and Condition(donal, patsy) -> Condition(patsy, donal)\nforall x (Civil(x) -> Lick(x, patsy))\nCondition(patsy, donal) and Civil(patsy) -> Politicise(patsy, donal)\nforall x (Politicise(x, donal) and Stearic(donal) -> Lick(donal, patsy))\nforall x (Barbarous(x) and Condition(x, patsy) -> Wilsonian(x))\nforall x (Condition(x, patsy) -> Politicise(x, patsy))\nforall x (Wilsonian(x) and Politicise(x, patsy) -> Politicise(patsy, donal))\n\nnot Politicise(patsy, donal)\n\ntherefore Politicise(patsy, donal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The trula is panoptic. The trula is greased. The trula is sworn. The trula is thoriated. The trula is phrenetic. The trula gazette the hogan. The trula herd the hogan. The hogan is thoriated. The hogan triple the trula. The hogan herd the trula. If something is thoriated and it gazette the trula then it is sworn. If the trula gazette the hogan and the hogan herd the trula then the trula herd the hogan. If something is thoriated then it triple the trula. If the trula herd the hogan and the trula is thoriated then the trula gazette the hogan. If something gazette the hogan and the hogan is panoptic then the hogan triple the trula. If something is greased and it herd the trula then it is sworn. If something herd the trula then it gazette the trula. If something is sworn and it gazette the trula then the trula gazette the hogan. The hogan gazette the trula.", "logic": "\nPanoptic(trula)\nGreased(trula)\nSworn(trula)\nThoriated(trula)\nPhrenetic(trula)\nGazette(trula, hogan)\nHerd(trula, hogan)\nThoriated(hogan)\nTriple(hogan, trula)\nHerd(hogan, trula)\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Gazette(x, trula) -> Sworn(x))\nGazette(trula, hogan) and Herd(hogan, trula) -> Herd(trula, hogan)\nforall x (Thoriated(x) -> Triple(x, trula))\nHerd(trula, hogan) and Thoriated(trula) -> Gazette(trula, hogan)\nforall x (Gazette(x, hogan) and Panoptic(hogan) -> Triple(hogan, trula))\nforall x (Greased(x) and Herd(x, trula) -> Sworn(x))\nforall x (Herd(x, trula) -> Gazette(x, trula))\nforall x (Sworn(x) and Gazette(x, trula) -> Gazette(trula, hogan))\n\nGazette(hogan, trula)\n\nHerd(hogan, trula) and forall x (Herd(x, trula) -> Gazette(x, trula)) -> therefore Gazette(hogan, trula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The jessamyn is toed. The jessamyn is occult. The jessamyn is dovish. The jessamyn is cormous. The jessamyn is euclidian. The jessamyn redound the zelig. The jessamyn repudiate the zelig. The zelig is cormous. The zelig stridulate the jessamyn. The zelig repudiate the jessamyn. If something is cormous and it redound the jessamyn then it is dovish. If the jessamyn redound the zelig and the zelig repudiate the jessamyn then the jessamyn repudiate the zelig. If something is cormous then it stridulate the jessamyn. If the jessamyn repudiate the zelig and the jessamyn is cormous then the jessamyn redound the zelig. If something redound the zelig and the zelig is toed then the zelig stridulate the jessamyn. If something is occult and it repudiate the jessamyn then it is dovish. If something repudiate the jessamyn then it redound the jessamyn. If something is dovish and it redound the jessamyn then the jessamyn redound the zelig. The jessamyn does not like the jessamyn.", "logic": "\nToed(jessamyn)\nOccult(jessamyn)\nDovish(jessamyn)\nCormous(jessamyn)\nEuclidian(jessamyn)\nRedound(jessamyn, zelig)\nRepudiate(jessamyn, zelig)\nCormous(zelig)\nStridulate(zelig, jessamyn)\nRepudiate(zelig, jessamyn)\nforall x (Cormous(x) and Redound(x, jessamyn) -> Dovish(x))\nRedound(jessamyn, zelig) and Repudiate(zelig, jessamyn) -> Repudiate(jessamyn, zelig)\nforall x (Cormous(x) -> Stridulate(x, jessamyn))\nRepudiate(jessamyn, zelig) and Cormous(jessamyn) -> Redound(jessamyn, zelig)\nforall x (Redound(x, zelig) and Toed(zelig) -> Stridulate(zelig, jessamyn))\nforall x (Occult(x) and Repudiate(x, jessamyn) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, jessamyn) -> Redound(x, jessamyn))\nforall x (Dovish(x) and Redound(x, jessamyn) -> Redound(jessamyn, zelig))\n\nnot Stridulate(jessamyn, jessamyn)\n\nCormous(jessamyn) and forall x (Cormous(x) -> Stridulate(x, jessamyn)) -> therefore Stridulate(jessamyn, jessamyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The reeva is univocal. The reeva is childless. The reeva is bushed. The reeva is seasonable. The reeva is inadequate. The reeva nurse the cortese. The reeva vermilion the cortese. The cortese is seasonable. The cortese advect the reeva. The cortese vermilion the reeva. If something is seasonable and it nurse the reeva then it is bushed. If the reeva nurse the cortese and the cortese vermilion the reeva then the reeva vermilion the cortese. If something is seasonable then it advect the reeva. If the reeva vermilion the cortese and the reeva is seasonable then the reeva nurse the cortese. If something nurse the cortese and the cortese is univocal then the cortese advect the reeva. If something is childless and it vermilion the reeva then it is bushed. If something vermilion the reeva then it nurse the reeva. If something is bushed and it nurse the reeva then the reeva nurse the cortese. The cortese is bushed.", "logic": "\nUnivocal(reeva)\nChildless(reeva)\nBushed(reeva)\nSeasonable(reeva)\nInadequate(reeva)\nNurse(reeva, cortese)\nVermilion(reeva, cortese)\nSeasonable(cortese)\nAdvect(cortese, reeva)\nVermilion(cortese, reeva)\nforall x (Seasonable(x) and Nurse(x, reeva) -> Bushed(x))\nNurse(reeva, cortese) and Vermilion(cortese, reeva) -> Vermilion(reeva, cortese)\nforall x (Seasonable(x) -> Advect(x, reeva))\nVermilion(reeva, cortese) and Seasonable(reeva) -> Nurse(reeva, cortese)\nforall x (Nurse(x, cortese) and Univocal(cortese) -> Advect(cortese, reeva))\nforall x (Childless(x) and Vermilion(x, reeva) -> Bushed(x))\nforall x (Vermilion(x, reeva) -> Nurse(x, reeva))\nforall x (Bushed(x) and Nurse(x, reeva) -> Nurse(reeva, cortese))\n\nBushed(cortese)\n\nVermilion(cortese, reeva) and forall x (Vermilion(x, reeva) -> Nurse(x, reeva)) -> therefore Nurse(cortese, reeva) Seasonable(cortese) and Nurse(cortese, reeva) and forall x (Seasonable(x) and Nurse(x, reeva) -> Bushed(x)) -> therefore Bushed(cortese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The sula is objective. The sula is battered. The sula is supposed. The sula is hardfisted. The sula is forgiving. The sula ping the erinna. The sula nickname the erinna. The erinna is hardfisted. The erinna gray the sula. The erinna nickname the sula. If something is hardfisted and it ping the sula then it is supposed. If the sula ping the erinna and the erinna nickname the sula then the sula nickname the erinna. If something is hardfisted then it gray the sula. If the sula nickname the erinna and the sula is hardfisted then the sula ping the erinna. If something ping the erinna and the erinna is objective then the erinna gray the sula. If something is battered and it nickname the sula then it is supposed. If something nickname the sula then it ping the sula. If something is supposed and it ping the sula then the sula ping the erinna. The erinna is not supposed.", "logic": "\nObjective(sula)\nBattered(sula)\nSupposed(sula)\nHardfisted(sula)\nForgiving(sula)\nPing(sula, erinna)\nNickname(sula, erinna)\nHardfisted(erinna)\nGray(erinna, sula)\nNickname(erinna, sula)\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) and Ping(x, sula) -> Supposed(x))\nPing(sula, erinna) and Nickname(erinna, sula) -> Nickname(sula, erinna)\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) -> Gray(x, sula))\nNickname(sula, erinna) and Hardfisted(sula) -> Ping(sula, erinna)\nforall x (Ping(x, erinna) and Objective(erinna) -> Gray(erinna, sula))\nforall x (Battered(x) and Nickname(x, sula) -> Supposed(x))\nforall x (Nickname(x, sula) -> Ping(x, sula))\nforall x (Supposed(x) and Ping(x, sula) -> Ping(sula, erinna))\n\nnot Supposed(erinna)\n\nNickname(erinna, sula) and forall x (Nickname(x, sula) -> Ping(x, sula)) -> therefore Ping(erinna, sula) Hardfisted(erinna) and Ping(erinna, sula) and forall x (Hardfisted(x) and Ping(x, sula) -> Supposed(x)) -> therefore Supposed(erinna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The susette is slapstick. The susette is disquieted. The susette is anarchical. The susette is yummy. The susette is coloured. The susette ramp the garnette. The susette lack the garnette. The garnette is yummy. The garnette discipline the susette. The garnette lack the susette. If something is yummy and it ramp the susette then it is anarchical. If the susette ramp the garnette and the garnette lack the susette then the susette lack the garnette. If something is yummy then it discipline the susette. If the susette lack the garnette and the susette is yummy then the susette ramp the garnette. If something ramp the garnette and the garnette is slapstick then the garnette discipline the susette. If something is disquieted and it lack the susette then it is anarchical. If something lack the susette then it ramp the susette. If something is anarchical and it ramp the susette then the susette ramp the garnette. The susette does not need the susette.", "logic": "\nSlapstick(susette)\nDisquieted(susette)\nAnarchical(susette)\nYummy(susette)\nColoured(susette)\nRamp(susette, garnette)\nLack(susette, garnette)\nYummy(garnette)\nDiscipline(garnette, susette)\nLack(garnette, susette)\nforall x (Yummy(x) and Ramp(x, susette) -> Anarchical(x))\nRamp(susette, garnette) and Lack(garnette, susette) -> Lack(susette, garnette)\nforall x (Yummy(x) -> Discipline(x, susette))\nLack(susette, garnette) and Yummy(susette) -> Ramp(susette, garnette)\nforall x (Ramp(x, garnette) and Slapstick(garnette) -> Discipline(garnette, susette))\nforall x (Disquieted(x) and Lack(x, susette) -> Anarchical(x))\nforall x (Lack(x, susette) -> Ramp(x, susette))\nforall x (Anarchical(x) and Ramp(x, susette) -> Ramp(susette, garnette))\n\nnot Ramp(susette, susette)\n\nforall x (Lack(x, susette) -> Ramp(x, susette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The wes is pilary. The wes is autocratic. The wes is foxy. The wes is unipolar. The wes is savoury. The wes flower the paulo. The wes castrate the paulo. The paulo is unipolar. The paulo pick the wes. The paulo castrate the wes. If something is unipolar and it flower the wes then it is foxy. If the wes flower the paulo and the paulo castrate the wes then the wes castrate the paulo. If something is unipolar then it pick the wes. If the wes castrate the paulo and the wes is unipolar then the wes flower the paulo. If something flower the paulo and the paulo is pilary then the paulo pick the wes. If something is autocratic and it castrate the wes then it is foxy. If something castrate the wes then it flower the wes. If something is foxy and it flower the wes then the wes flower the paulo. The paulo castrate the paulo.", "logic": "\nPilary(wes)\nAutocratic(wes)\nFoxy(wes)\nUnipolar(wes)\nSavoury(wes)\nFlower(wes, paulo)\nCastrate(wes, paulo)\nUnipolar(paulo)\nPick(paulo, wes)\nCastrate(paulo, wes)\nforall x (Unipolar(x) and Flower(x, wes) -> Foxy(x))\nFlower(wes, paulo) and Castrate(paulo, wes) -> Castrate(wes, paulo)\nforall x (Unipolar(x) -> Pick(x, wes))\nCastrate(wes, paulo) and Unipolar(wes) -> Flower(wes, paulo)\nforall x (Flower(x, paulo) and Pilary(paulo) -> Pick(paulo, wes))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) and Castrate(x, wes) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Castrate(x, wes) -> Flower(x, wes))\nforall x (Foxy(x) and Flower(x, wes) -> Flower(wes, paulo))\n\nCastrate(paulo, paulo)\n\nCastrate(paulo, paulo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The whitaker is vascular. The whitaker is eatable. The whitaker is thievish. The whitaker is culpable. The whitaker is world. The whitaker stunt the katheryn. The whitaker readapt the katheryn. The katheryn is culpable. The katheryn branch the whitaker. The katheryn readapt the whitaker. If something is culpable and it stunt the whitaker then it is thievish. If the whitaker stunt the katheryn and the katheryn readapt the whitaker then the whitaker readapt the katheryn. If something is culpable then it branch the whitaker. If the whitaker readapt the katheryn and the whitaker is culpable then the whitaker stunt the katheryn. If something stunt the katheryn and the katheryn is vascular then the katheryn branch the whitaker. If something is eatable and it readapt the whitaker then it is thievish. If something readapt the whitaker then it stunt the whitaker. If something is thievish and it stunt the whitaker then the whitaker stunt the katheryn. The katheryn does not need the katheryn.", "logic": "\nVascular(whitaker)\nEatable(whitaker)\nThievish(whitaker)\nCulpable(whitaker)\nWorld(whitaker)\nStunt(whitaker, katheryn)\nReadapt(whitaker, katheryn)\nCulpable(katheryn)\nBranch(katheryn, whitaker)\nReadapt(katheryn, whitaker)\nforall x (Culpable(x) and Stunt(x, whitaker) -> Thievish(x))\nStunt(whitaker, katheryn) and Readapt(katheryn, whitaker) -> Readapt(whitaker, katheryn)\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Branch(x, whitaker))\nReadapt(whitaker, katheryn) and Culpable(whitaker) -> Stunt(whitaker, katheryn)\nforall x (Stunt(x, katheryn) and Vascular(katheryn) -> Branch(katheryn, whitaker))\nforall x (Eatable(x) and Readapt(x, whitaker) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Readapt(x, whitaker) -> Stunt(x, whitaker))\nforall x (Thievish(x) and Stunt(x, whitaker) -> Stunt(whitaker, katheryn))\n\nnot Stunt(katheryn, katheryn)\n\nnot Stunt(katheryn, katheryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The benjamin is negligent. The benjamin is steamed. The benjamin is gauzy. The benjamin is splenic. The benjamin is mined. The benjamin wince the susanne. The benjamin misalign the susanne. The susanne is splenic. The susanne swarm the benjamin. The susanne misalign the benjamin. If something is splenic and it wince the benjamin then it is gauzy. If the benjamin wince the susanne and the susanne misalign the benjamin then the benjamin misalign the susanne. If something is splenic then it swarm the benjamin. If the benjamin misalign the susanne and the benjamin is splenic then the benjamin wince the susanne. If something wince the susanne and the susanne is negligent then the susanne swarm the benjamin. If something is steamed and it misalign the benjamin then it is gauzy. If something misalign the benjamin then it wince the benjamin. If something is gauzy and it wince the benjamin then the benjamin wince the susanne. The benjamin swarm the susanne.", "logic": "\nNegligent(benjamin)\nSteamed(benjamin)\nGauzy(benjamin)\nSplenic(benjamin)\nMined(benjamin)\nWince(benjamin, susanne)\nMisalign(benjamin, susanne)\nSplenic(susanne)\nSwarm(susanne, benjamin)\nMisalign(susanne, benjamin)\nforall x (Splenic(x) and Wince(x, benjamin) -> Gauzy(x))\nWince(benjamin, susanne) and Misalign(susanne, benjamin) -> Misalign(benjamin, susanne)\nforall x (Splenic(x) -> Swarm(x, benjamin))\nMisalign(benjamin, susanne) and Splenic(benjamin) -> Wince(benjamin, susanne)\nforall x (Wince(x, susanne) and Negligent(susanne) -> Swarm(susanne, benjamin))\nforall x (Steamed(x) and Misalign(x, benjamin) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Misalign(x, benjamin) -> Wince(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Gauzy(x) and Wince(x, benjamin) -> Wince(benjamin, susanne))\n\nSwarm(benjamin, susanne)\n\nSwarm(benjamin, susanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The irving is unheeded. The irving is exploitive. The irving is accusing. The irving is unoriented. The irving is sightly. The irving illegalise the shantee. The irving squinch the shantee. The shantee is unoriented. The shantee entrance the irving. The shantee squinch the irving. If something is unoriented and it illegalise the irving then it is accusing. If the irving illegalise the shantee and the shantee squinch the irving then the irving squinch the shantee. If something is unoriented then it entrance the irving. If the irving squinch the shantee and the irving is unoriented then the irving illegalise the shantee. If something illegalise the shantee and the shantee is unheeded then the shantee entrance the irving. If something is exploitive and it squinch the irving then it is accusing. If something squinch the irving then it illegalise the irving. If something is accusing and it illegalise the irving then the irving illegalise the shantee. The shantee is not sightly.", "logic": "\nUnheeded(irving)\nExploitive(irving)\nAccusing(irving)\nUnoriented(irving)\nSightly(irving)\nIllegalise(irving, shantee)\nSquinch(irving, shantee)\nUnoriented(shantee)\nEntrance(shantee, irving)\nSquinch(shantee, irving)\nforall x (Unoriented(x) and Illegalise(x, irving) -> Accusing(x))\nIllegalise(irving, shantee) and Squinch(shantee, irving) -> Squinch(irving, shantee)\nforall x (Unoriented(x) -> Entrance(x, irving))\nSquinch(irving, shantee) and Unoriented(irving) -> Illegalise(irving, shantee)\nforall x (Illegalise(x, shantee) and Unheeded(shantee) -> Entrance(shantee, irving))\nforall x (Exploitive(x) and Squinch(x, irving) -> Accusing(x))\nforall x (Squinch(x, irving) -> Illegalise(x, irving))\nforall x (Accusing(x) and Illegalise(x, irving) -> Illegalise(irving, shantee))\n\nnot Sightly(shantee)\n\nnot Sightly(shantee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "The grete is longtime. The grete is ismaili. The grete is wordy. The grete is childish. The grete is yellowish. The grete severalise the maynard. The grete drive the maynard. The maynard is childish. The maynard slow the grete. The maynard drive the grete. If something is childish and it severalise the grete then it is wordy. If the grete severalise the maynard and the maynard drive the grete then the grete drive the maynard. If something is childish then it slow the grete. If the grete drive the maynard and the grete is childish then the grete severalise the maynard. If something severalise the maynard and the maynard is longtime then the maynard slow the grete. If something is ismaili and it drive the grete then it is wordy. If something drive the grete then it severalise the grete. If something is wordy and it severalise the grete then the grete severalise the maynard. The maynard is ismaili.", "logic": "\nLongtime(grete)\nIsmaili(grete)\nWordy(grete)\nChildish(grete)\nYellowish(grete)\nSeveralise(grete, maynard)\nDrive(grete, maynard)\nChildish(maynard)\nSlow(maynard, grete)\nDrive(maynard, grete)\nforall x (Childish(x) and Severalise(x, grete) -> Wordy(x))\nSeveralise(grete, maynard) and Drive(maynard, grete) -> Drive(grete, maynard)\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Slow(x, grete))\nDrive(grete, maynard) and Childish(grete) -> Severalise(grete, maynard)\nforall x (Severalise(x, maynard) and Longtime(maynard) -> Slow(maynard, grete))\nforall x (Ismaili(x) and Drive(x, grete) -> Wordy(x))\nforall x (Drive(x, grete) -> Severalise(x, grete))\nforall x (Wordy(x) and Severalise(x, grete) -> Severalise(grete, maynard))\n\nIsmaili(maynard)\n\nIsmaili(maynard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-207"} {"premises": "Tedra is sodding. Tedra is recreant. Tedra is cheap. Tedra is older. Tedra is lined. Tedra is asteroidal. Tedra is terrific. Sophia is cheap. Sophia is lined. Sophia is asteroidal. If something is asteroidal then it is lined. All older, lined things are asteroidal. If something is cheap and terrific then it is older. If Tedra is older and Tedra is sodding then Tedra is lined. If something is sodding and lined then it is terrific. All older things are recreant. Quiet, recreant things are cheap. All lined things are terrific. Tedra is terrific.", "logic": "\nSodding(tedra)\nRecreant(tedra)\nCheap(tedra)\nOlder(tedra)\nLined(tedra)\nAsteroidal(tedra)\nTerrific(tedra)\nCheap(sophia)\nLined(sophia)\nAsteroidal(sophia)\nforall x (Asteroidal(x) -> Lined(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and Lined(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Cheap(x) and Terrific(x) -> Older(x))\nOlder(tedra) and Sodding(tedra) -> Lined(tedra)\nforall x (Sodding(x) and Lined(x) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Older(x) -> Recreant(x))\nforall x (Older(x) and Recreant(x) -> Cheap(x))\nforall x (Lined(x) -> Terrific(x))\n\nTerrific(tedra)\n\ntherefore Terrific(tedra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Erasmus is louche. Erasmus is bonkers. Erasmus is blae. Erasmus is grassroots. Erasmus is wobbly. Erasmus is civil. Erasmus is hominian. Georgetta is blae. Georgetta is wobbly. Georgetta is civil. If something is civil then it is wobbly. All grassroots, wobbly things are civil. If something is blae and hominian then it is grassroots. If Erasmus is grassroots and Erasmus is louche then Erasmus is wobbly. If something is louche and wobbly then it is hominian. All grassroots things are bonkers. Quiet, bonkers things are blae. All wobbly things are hominian. Georgetta is not wobbly.", "logic": "\nLouche(erasmus)\nBonkers(erasmus)\nBlae(erasmus)\nGrassroots(erasmus)\nWobbly(erasmus)\nCivil(erasmus)\nHominian(erasmus)\nBlae(georgetta)\nWobbly(georgetta)\nCivil(georgetta)\nforall x (Civil(x) -> Wobbly(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) and Wobbly(x) -> Civil(x))\nforall x (Blae(x) and Hominian(x) -> Grassroots(x))\nGrassroots(erasmus) and Louche(erasmus) -> Wobbly(erasmus)\nforall x (Louche(x) and Wobbly(x) -> Hominian(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) -> Bonkers(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) and Bonkers(x) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Hominian(x))\n\nnot Wobbly(georgetta)\n\ntherefore Wobbly(georgetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Toddy is nontoxic. Toddy is encysted. Toddy is socialised. Toddy is berrylike. Toddy is danish. Toddy is twisted. Toddy is hymeneal. Elwina is socialised. Elwina is danish. Elwina is twisted. If something is twisted then it is danish. All berrylike, danish things are twisted. If something is socialised and hymeneal then it is berrylike. If Toddy is berrylike and Toddy is nontoxic then Toddy is danish. If something is nontoxic and danish then it is hymeneal. All berrylike things are encysted. Quiet, encysted things are socialised. All danish things are hymeneal. Elwina is hymeneal.", "logic": "\nNontoxic(toddy)\nEncysted(toddy)\nSocialised(toddy)\nBerrylike(toddy)\nDanish(toddy)\nTwisted(toddy)\nHymeneal(toddy)\nSocialised(elwina)\nDanish(elwina)\nTwisted(elwina)\nforall x (Twisted(x) -> Danish(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and Danish(x) -> Twisted(x))\nforall x (Socialised(x) and Hymeneal(x) -> Berrylike(x))\nBerrylike(toddy) and Nontoxic(toddy) -> Danish(toddy)\nforall x (Nontoxic(x) and Danish(x) -> Hymeneal(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) -> Encysted(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and Encysted(x) -> Socialised(x))\nforall x (Danish(x) -> Hymeneal(x))\n\nHymeneal(elwina)\n\nDanish(elwina) and forall x (Danish(x) -> Hymeneal(x)) -> therefore Hymeneal(elwina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Marius is nosohusial. Marius is frisian. Marius is monovular. Marius is tardive. Marius is beastly. Marius is crossbred. Marius is resentful. Somerset is monovular. Somerset is beastly. Somerset is crossbred. If something is crossbred then it is beastly. All tardive, beastly things are crossbred. If something is monovular and resentful then it is tardive. If Marius is tardive and Marius is nosohusial then Marius is beastly. If something is nosohusial and beastly then it is resentful. All tardive things are frisian. Quiet, frisian things are monovular. All beastly things are resentful. Somerset is not resentful.", "logic": "\nNosohusial(marius)\nFrisian(marius)\nMonovular(marius)\nTardive(marius)\nBeastly(marius)\nCrossbred(marius)\nResentful(marius)\nMonovular(somerset)\nBeastly(somerset)\nCrossbred(somerset)\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> Beastly(x))\nforall x (Tardive(x) and Beastly(x) -> Crossbred(x))\nforall x (Monovular(x) and Resentful(x) -> Tardive(x))\nTardive(marius) and Nosohusial(marius) -> Beastly(marius)\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) and Beastly(x) -> Resentful(x))\nforall x (Tardive(x) -> Frisian(x))\nforall x (Tardive(x) and Frisian(x) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Beastly(x) -> Resentful(x))\n\nnot Resentful(somerset)\n\nBeastly(somerset) and forall x (Beastly(x) -> Resentful(x)) -> therefore Resentful(somerset)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Morgan is tedious. Morgan is miniscule. Morgan is rallying. Morgan is frore. Morgan is hick. Morgan is discursive. Morgan is unalike. Judy is rallying. Judy is hick. Judy is discursive. If something is discursive then it is hick. All frore, hick things are discursive. If something is rallying and unalike then it is frore. If Morgan is frore and Morgan is tedious then Morgan is hick. If something is tedious and hick then it is unalike. All frore things are miniscule. Quiet, miniscule things are rallying. All hick things are unalike. Judy is frore.", "logic": "\nTedious(morgan)\nMiniscule(morgan)\nRallying(morgan)\nFrore(morgan)\nHick(morgan)\nDiscursive(morgan)\nUnalike(morgan)\nRallying(judy)\nHick(judy)\nDiscursive(judy)\nforall x (Discursive(x) -> Hick(x))\nforall x (Frore(x) and Hick(x) -> Discursive(x))\nforall x (Rallying(x) and Unalike(x) -> Frore(x))\nFrore(morgan) and Tedious(morgan) -> Hick(morgan)\nforall x (Tedious(x) and Hick(x) -> Unalike(x))\nforall x (Frore(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nforall x (Frore(x) and Miniscule(x) -> Rallying(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) -> Unalike(x))\n\nFrore(judy)\n\nHick(judy) and forall x (Hick(x) -> Unalike(x)) -> therefore Unalike(judy) Rallying(judy) and Unalike(judy) and forall x (Rallying(x) and Unalike(x) -> Frore(x)) -> therefore Frore(judy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Emera is transonic. Emera is basilar. Emera is gawky. Emera is bolshevist. Emera is brainy. Emera is seismal. Emera is calcic. Andre is gawky. Andre is brainy. Andre is seismal. If something is seismal then it is brainy. All bolshevist, brainy things are seismal. If something is gawky and calcic then it is bolshevist. If Emera is bolshevist and Emera is transonic then Emera is brainy. If something is transonic and brainy then it is calcic. All bolshevist things are basilar. Quiet, basilar things are gawky. All brainy things are calcic. Andre is not bolshevist.", "logic": "\nTransonic(emera)\nBasilar(emera)\nGawky(emera)\nBolshevist(emera)\nBrainy(emera)\nSeismal(emera)\nCalcic(emera)\nGawky(andre)\nBrainy(andre)\nSeismal(andre)\nforall x (Seismal(x) -> Brainy(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) and Brainy(x) -> Seismal(x))\nforall x (Gawky(x) and Calcic(x) -> Bolshevist(x))\nBolshevist(emera) and Transonic(emera) -> Brainy(emera)\nforall x (Transonic(x) and Brainy(x) -> Calcic(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) and Basilar(x) -> Gawky(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) -> Calcic(x))\n\nnot Bolshevist(andre)\n\nBrainy(andre) and forall x (Brainy(x) -> Calcic(x)) -> therefore Calcic(andre) Gawky(andre) and Calcic(andre) and forall x (Gawky(x) and Calcic(x) -> Bolshevist(x)) -> therefore Bolshevist(andre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Mika is lamplit. Mika is blebbed. Mika is inland. Mika is unready. Mika is covered. Mika is syndetic. Mika is galwegian. Ebba is inland. Ebba is covered. Ebba is syndetic. If something is syndetic then it is covered. All unready, covered things are syndetic. If something is inland and galwegian then it is unready. If Mika is unready and Mika is lamplit then Mika is covered. If something is lamplit and covered then it is galwegian. All unready things are blebbed. Quiet, blebbed things are inland. All covered things are galwegian. Ebba is blebbed.", "logic": "\nLamplit(mika)\nBlebbed(mika)\nInland(mika)\nUnready(mika)\nCovered(mika)\nSyndetic(mika)\nGalwegian(mika)\nInland(ebba)\nCovered(ebba)\nSyndetic(ebba)\nforall x (Syndetic(x) -> Covered(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Covered(x) -> Syndetic(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) and Galwegian(x) -> Unready(x))\nUnready(mika) and Lamplit(mika) -> Covered(mika)\nforall x (Lamplit(x) and Covered(x) -> Galwegian(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Blebbed(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Blebbed(x) -> Inland(x))\nforall x (Covered(x) -> Galwegian(x))\n\nBlebbed(ebba)\n\nCovered(ebba) and forall x (Covered(x) -> Galwegian(x)) -> therefore Galwegian(ebba) Inland(ebba) and Galwegian(ebba) and forall x (Inland(x) and Galwegian(x) -> Unready(x)) -> therefore Unready(ebba) Unready(ebba) and forall x (Unready(x) -> Blebbed(x)) -> therefore Blebbed(ebba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Linnell is ubiquitous. Linnell is reusable. Linnell is still. Linnell is ravishing. Linnell is disparate. Linnell is grown. Linnell is assigned. Jeannette is still. Jeannette is disparate. Jeannette is grown. If something is grown then it is disparate. All ravishing, disparate things are grown. If something is still and assigned then it is ravishing. If Linnell is ravishing and Linnell is ubiquitous then Linnell is disparate. If something is ubiquitous and disparate then it is assigned. All ravishing things are reusable. Quiet, reusable things are still. All disparate things are assigned. Jeannette is not reusable.", "logic": "\nUbiquitous(linnell)\nReusable(linnell)\nStill(linnell)\nRavishing(linnell)\nDisparate(linnell)\nGrown(linnell)\nAssigned(linnell)\nStill(jeannette)\nDisparate(jeannette)\nGrown(jeannette)\nforall x (Grown(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) and Disparate(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Still(x) and Assigned(x) -> Ravishing(x))\nRavishing(linnell) and Ubiquitous(linnell) -> Disparate(linnell)\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) and Disparate(x) -> Assigned(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) -> Reusable(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) and Reusable(x) -> Still(x))\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Assigned(x))\n\nnot Reusable(jeannette)\n\nDisparate(jeannette) and forall x (Disparate(x) -> Assigned(x)) -> therefore Assigned(jeannette) Still(jeannette) and Assigned(jeannette) and forall x (Still(x) and Assigned(x) -> Ravishing(x)) -> therefore Ravishing(jeannette) Ravishing(jeannette) and forall x (Ravishing(x) -> Reusable(x)) -> therefore Reusable(jeannette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-140"} {"premises": "Tobie is semilunar. Tobie is not unrepaired. Maddie is unrepaired. Maddie is unvarying. Maddie is spirited. Maddie is scary. Waverly is semilunar. Waverly is spirited. Waverly is workaday. Waverly is scary. Hanan is not semilunar. Hanan is stomatal. If something is stomatal then it is workaday. If Tobie is not semilunar then Tobie is unrepaired. Quiet things are spirited. If something is workaday and unvarying then it is spirited. If Maddie is workaday and Maddie is unvarying then Maddie is stomatal. Green things are unvarying. All spirited things are scary. If something is semilunar then it is stomatal. Maddie is unvarying.", "logic": "\nSemilunar(tobie)\nnot Unrepaired(tobie)\nUnrepaired(maddie)\nUnvarying(maddie)\nSpirited(maddie)\nScary(maddie)\nSemilunar(waverly)\nSpirited(waverly)\nWorkaday(waverly)\nScary(waverly)\nnot Semilunar(hanan)\nStomatal(hanan)\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> Workaday(x))\nnot Semilunar(tobie) -> Unrepaired(tobie)\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) -> Spirited(x))\nforall x (Workaday(x) and Unvarying(x) -> Spirited(x))\nWorkaday(maddie) and Unvarying(maddie) -> Stomatal(maddie)\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nforall x (Spirited(x) -> Scary(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Stomatal(x))\n\nUnvarying(maddie)\n\ntherefore Unvarying(maddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Jerri is pestering. Jerri is not boric. Whitby is boric. Whitby is fingered. Whitby is silklike. Whitby is corroded. Lucas is pestering. Lucas is silklike. Lucas is apart. Lucas is corroded. Loise is not pestering. Loise is rustless. If something is rustless then it is apart. If Jerri is not pestering then Jerri is boric. Quiet things are silklike. If something is apart and fingered then it is silklike. If Whitby is apart and Whitby is fingered then Whitby is rustless. Green things are fingered. All silklike things are corroded. If something is pestering then it is rustless. Lucas is not corroded.", "logic": "\nPestering(jerri)\nnot Boric(jerri)\nBoric(whitby)\nFingered(whitby)\nSilklike(whitby)\nCorroded(whitby)\nPestering(lucas)\nSilklike(lucas)\nApart(lucas)\nCorroded(lucas)\nnot Pestering(loise)\nRustless(loise)\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Apart(x))\nnot Pestering(jerri) -> Boric(jerri)\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Apart(x) and Fingered(x) -> Silklike(x))\nApart(whitby) and Fingered(whitby) -> Rustless(whitby)\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Fingered(x))\nforall x (Silklike(x) -> Corroded(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) -> Rustless(x))\n\nnot Corroded(lucas)\n\ntherefore Corroded(lucas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Tobie is subliminal. Tobie is not antipodal. Katina is antipodal. Katina is flyaway. Katina is malted. Katina is toxic. Maggie is subliminal. Maggie is malted. Maggie is auditory. Maggie is toxic. Giorgio is not subliminal. Giorgio is pyrolytic. If something is pyrolytic then it is auditory. If Tobie is not subliminal then Tobie is antipodal. Quiet things are malted. If something is auditory and flyaway then it is malted. If Katina is auditory and Katina is flyaway then Katina is pyrolytic. Green things are flyaway. All malted things are toxic. If something is subliminal then it is pyrolytic. Giorgio is flyaway.", "logic": "\nSubliminal(tobie)\nnot Antipodal(tobie)\nAntipodal(katina)\nFlyaway(katina)\nMalted(katina)\nToxic(katina)\nSubliminal(maggie)\nMalted(maggie)\nAuditory(maggie)\nToxic(maggie)\nnot Subliminal(giorgio)\nPyrolytic(giorgio)\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Auditory(x))\nnot Subliminal(tobie) -> Antipodal(tobie)\nforall x (Antipodal(x) -> Malted(x))\nforall x (Auditory(x) and Flyaway(x) -> Malted(x))\nAuditory(katina) and Flyaway(katina) -> Pyrolytic(katina)\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Flyaway(x))\nforall x (Malted(x) -> Toxic(x))\nforall x (Subliminal(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\n\nFlyaway(giorgio)\n\nPyrolytic(giorgio) and forall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Flyaway(x)) -> therefore Flyaway(giorgio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Lothar is shoaly. Lothar is not searing. Iggy is searing. Iggy is prewar. Iggy is maltreated. Iggy is ornamental. Carley is shoaly. Carley is maltreated. Carley is sleeved. Carley is ornamental. Lora is not shoaly. Lora is highbrow. If something is highbrow then it is sleeved. If Lothar is not shoaly then Lothar is searing. Quiet things are maltreated. If something is sleeved and prewar then it is maltreated. If Iggy is sleeved and Iggy is prewar then Iggy is highbrow. Green things are prewar. All maltreated things are ornamental. If something is shoaly then it is highbrow. Carley is not highbrow.", "logic": "\nShoaly(lothar)\nnot Searing(lothar)\nSearing(iggy)\nPrewar(iggy)\nMaltreated(iggy)\nOrnamental(iggy)\nShoaly(carley)\nMaltreated(carley)\nSleeved(carley)\nOrnamental(carley)\nnot Shoaly(lora)\nHighbrow(lora)\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nnot Shoaly(lothar) -> Searing(lothar)\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nforall x (Sleeved(x) and Prewar(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nSleeved(iggy) and Prewar(iggy) -> Highbrow(iggy)\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Prewar(x))\nforall x (Maltreated(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Shoaly(x) -> Highbrow(x))\n\nnot Highbrow(carley)\n\nShoaly(carley) and forall x (Shoaly(x) -> Highbrow(x)) -> therefore Highbrow(carley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Josey is fried. Josey is not quadruple. Vilhelm is quadruple. Vilhelm is pouchlike. Vilhelm is cerous. Vilhelm is retrousse. Sarah is fried. Sarah is cerous. Sarah is upsetting. Sarah is retrousse. Ervin is not fried. Ervin is spiffy. If something is spiffy then it is upsetting. If Josey is not fried then Josey is quadruple. Quiet things are cerous. If something is upsetting and pouchlike then it is cerous. If Vilhelm is upsetting and Vilhelm is pouchlike then Vilhelm is spiffy. Green things are pouchlike. All cerous things are retrousse. If something is fried then it is spiffy. Josey is upsetting.", "logic": "\nFried(josey)\nnot Quadruple(josey)\nQuadruple(vilhelm)\nPouchlike(vilhelm)\nCerous(vilhelm)\nRetrousse(vilhelm)\nFried(sarah)\nCerous(sarah)\nUpsetting(sarah)\nRetrousse(sarah)\nnot Fried(ervin)\nSpiffy(ervin)\nforall x (Spiffy(x) -> Upsetting(x))\nnot Fried(josey) -> Quadruple(josey)\nforall x (Quadruple(x) -> Cerous(x))\nforall x (Upsetting(x) and Pouchlike(x) -> Cerous(x))\nUpsetting(vilhelm) and Pouchlike(vilhelm) -> Spiffy(vilhelm)\nforall x (Spiffy(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nforall x (Cerous(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Fried(x) -> Spiffy(x))\n\nUpsetting(josey)\n\nFried(josey) and forall x (Fried(x) -> Spiffy(x)) -> therefore Spiffy(josey) Spiffy(josey) and forall x (Spiffy(x) -> Upsetting(x)) -> therefore Upsetting(josey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Nissa is cotyloid. Nissa is not azido. Avivah is azido. Avivah is demode. Avivah is eased. Avivah is solicitous. Amata is cotyloid. Amata is eased. Amata is araceous. Amata is solicitous. Thia is not cotyloid. Thia is ancient. If something is ancient then it is araceous. If Nissa is not cotyloid then Nissa is azido. Quiet things are eased. If something is araceous and demode then it is eased. If Avivah is araceous and Avivah is demode then Avivah is ancient. Green things are demode. All eased things are solicitous. If something is cotyloid then it is ancient. Thia is not eased.", "logic": "\nCotyloid(nissa)\nnot Azido(nissa)\nAzido(avivah)\nDemode(avivah)\nEased(avivah)\nSolicitous(avivah)\nCotyloid(amata)\nEased(amata)\nAraceous(amata)\nSolicitous(amata)\nnot Cotyloid(thia)\nAncient(thia)\nforall x (Ancient(x) -> Araceous(x))\nnot Cotyloid(nissa) -> Azido(nissa)\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Eased(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) and Demode(x) -> Eased(x))\nAraceous(avivah) and Demode(avivah) -> Ancient(avivah)\nforall x (Ancient(x) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Eased(x) -> Solicitous(x))\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) -> Ancient(x))\n\nnot Eased(thia)\n\nAncient(thia) and forall x (Ancient(x) -> Araceous(x)) -> therefore Araceous(thia) Ancient(thia) and forall x (Ancient(x) -> Demode(x)) -> therefore Demode(thia) Araceous(thia) and Demode(thia) and forall x (Araceous(x) and Demode(x) -> Eased(x)) -> therefore Eased(thia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Gabie is flagrant. Gabie is not semiweekly. Stepha is semiweekly. Stepha is unsparing. Stepha is giving. Stepha is acronymic. Munmro is flagrant. Munmro is giving. Munmro is diverse. Munmro is acronymic. Hunter is not flagrant. Hunter is animated. If something is animated then it is diverse. If Gabie is not flagrant then Gabie is semiweekly. Quiet things are giving. If something is diverse and unsparing then it is giving. If Stepha is diverse and Stepha is unsparing then Stepha is animated. Green things are unsparing. All giving things are acronymic. If something is flagrant then it is animated. Hunter is acronymic.", "logic": "\nFlagrant(gabie)\nnot Semiweekly(gabie)\nSemiweekly(stepha)\nUnsparing(stepha)\nGiving(stepha)\nAcronymic(stepha)\nFlagrant(munmro)\nGiving(munmro)\nDiverse(munmro)\nAcronymic(munmro)\nnot Flagrant(hunter)\nAnimated(hunter)\nforall x (Animated(x) -> Diverse(x))\nnot Flagrant(gabie) -> Semiweekly(gabie)\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Giving(x))\nforall x (Diverse(x) and Unsparing(x) -> Giving(x))\nDiverse(stepha) and Unsparing(stepha) -> Animated(stepha)\nforall x (Animated(x) -> Unsparing(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) -> Acronymic(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Animated(x))\n\nAcronymic(hunter)\n\nAnimated(hunter) and forall x (Animated(x) -> Diverse(x)) -> therefore Diverse(hunter) Animated(hunter) and forall x (Animated(x) -> Unsparing(x)) -> therefore Unsparing(hunter) Diverse(hunter) and Unsparing(hunter) and forall x (Diverse(x) and Unsparing(x) -> Giving(x)) -> therefore Giving(hunter) Giving(hunter) and forall x (Giving(x) -> Acronymic(x)) -> therefore Acronymic(hunter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Tandie is swell. Tandie is not senecan. Randal is senecan. Randal is cetaceous. Randal is atrocious. Randal is disciform. Roch is swell. Roch is atrocious. Roch is homey. Roch is disciform. Ebba is not swell. Ebba is after. If something is after then it is homey. If Tandie is not swell then Tandie is senecan. Quiet things are atrocious. If something is homey and cetaceous then it is atrocious. If Randal is homey and Randal is cetaceous then Randal is after. Green things are cetaceous. All atrocious things are disciform. If something is swell then it is after. Tandie is not atrocious.", "logic": "\nSwell(tandie)\nnot Senecan(tandie)\nSenecan(randal)\nCetaceous(randal)\nAtrocious(randal)\nDisciform(randal)\nSwell(roch)\nAtrocious(roch)\nHomey(roch)\nDisciform(roch)\nnot Swell(ebba)\nAfter(ebba)\nforall x (After(x) -> Homey(x))\nnot Swell(tandie) -> Senecan(tandie)\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Atrocious(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) and Cetaceous(x) -> Atrocious(x))\nHomey(randal) and Cetaceous(randal) -> After(randal)\nforall x (After(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\nforall x (Atrocious(x) -> Disciform(x))\nforall x (Swell(x) -> After(x))\n\nnot Atrocious(tandie)\n\nSwell(tandie) and forall x (Swell(x) -> After(x)) -> therefore After(tandie) After(tandie) and forall x (After(x) -> Homey(x)) -> therefore Homey(tandie) Swell(tandie) and forall x (Swell(x) -> After(x)) -> therefore After(tandie) After(tandie) and forall x (After(x) -> Cetaceous(x)) -> therefore Cetaceous(tandie) Homey(tandie) and Cetaceous(tandie) and forall x (Homey(x) and Cetaceous(x) -> Atrocious(x)) -> therefore Atrocious(tandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Doralynn is demented. Doralynn is not odorous. Nate is odorous. Nate is disgustful. Nate is each. Nate is syntactic. Erny is demented. Erny is each. Erny is jihadi. Erny is syntactic. Roarke is not demented. Roarke is isogonic. If something is isogonic then it is jihadi. If Doralynn is not demented then Doralynn is odorous. Quiet things are each. If something is jihadi and disgustful then it is each. If Nate is jihadi and Nate is disgustful then Nate is isogonic. Green things are disgustful. All each things are syntactic. If something is demented then it is isogonic. Nate is not jihadi.", "logic": "\nDemented(doralynn)\nnot Odorous(doralynn)\nOdorous(nate)\nDisgustful(nate)\nEach(nate)\nSyntactic(nate)\nDemented(erny)\nEach(erny)\nJihadi(erny)\nSyntactic(erny)\nnot Demented(roarke)\nIsogonic(roarke)\nforall x (Isogonic(x) -> Jihadi(x))\nnot Demented(doralynn) -> Odorous(doralynn)\nforall x (Odorous(x) -> Each(x))\nforall x (Jihadi(x) and Disgustful(x) -> Each(x))\nJihadi(nate) and Disgustful(nate) -> Isogonic(nate)\nforall x (Isogonic(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Each(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Demented(x) -> Isogonic(x))\n\nnot Jihadi(nate)\n\nforall x (Isogonic(x) -> Jihadi(x)) <- Jihadi(nate) and Disgustful(nate) -> Isogonic(nate) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Shawn is bantering. Shawn is not thumbed. Sawyere is thumbed. Sawyere is metacarpal. Sawyere is pebbly. Sawyere is strident. Hamnet is bantering. Hamnet is pebbly. Hamnet is mayoral. Hamnet is strident. Colline is not bantering. Colline is baptised. If something is baptised then it is mayoral. If Shawn is not bantering then Shawn is thumbed. Quiet things are pebbly. If something is mayoral and metacarpal then it is pebbly. If Sawyere is mayoral and Sawyere is metacarpal then Sawyere is baptised. Green things are metacarpal. All pebbly things are strident. If something is bantering then it is baptised. Sawyere is baptised.", "logic": "\nBantering(shawn)\nnot Thumbed(shawn)\nThumbed(sawyere)\nMetacarpal(sawyere)\nPebbly(sawyere)\nStrident(sawyere)\nBantering(hamnet)\nPebbly(hamnet)\nMayoral(hamnet)\nStrident(hamnet)\nnot Bantering(colline)\nBaptised(colline)\nforall x (Baptised(x) -> Mayoral(x))\nnot Bantering(shawn) -> Thumbed(shawn)\nforall x (Thumbed(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nforall x (Mayoral(x) and Metacarpal(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nMayoral(sawyere) and Metacarpal(sawyere) -> Baptised(sawyere)\nforall x (Baptised(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> Baptised(x))\n\nBaptised(sawyere)\n\nMayoral(sawyere) and Metacarpal(sawyere) -> Baptised(sawyere) <- forall x (Baptised(x) -> Mayoral(x)) <- forall x (Bantering(x) -> Baptised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Donald is randy. Donald is not lucrative. Dalila is lucrative. Dalila is unpillared. Dalila is ownerless. Dalila is burned. Nicki is randy. Nicki is ownerless. Nicki is dutiful. Nicki is burned. Madelon is not randy. Madelon is required. If something is required then it is dutiful. If Donald is not randy then Donald is lucrative. Quiet things are ownerless. If something is dutiful and unpillared then it is ownerless. If Dalila is dutiful and Dalila is unpillared then Dalila is required. Green things are unpillared. All ownerless things are burned. If something is randy then it is required. Dalila is not randy.", "logic": "\nRandy(donald)\nnot Lucrative(donald)\nLucrative(dalila)\nUnpillared(dalila)\nOwnerless(dalila)\nBurned(dalila)\nRandy(nicki)\nOwnerless(nicki)\nDutiful(nicki)\nBurned(nicki)\nnot Randy(madelon)\nRequired(madelon)\nforall x (Required(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nnot Randy(donald) -> Lucrative(donald)\nforall x (Lucrative(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Dutiful(x) and Unpillared(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nDutiful(dalila) and Unpillared(dalila) -> Required(dalila)\nforall x (Required(x) -> Unpillared(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Burned(x))\nforall x (Randy(x) -> Required(x))\n\nnot Randy(dalila)\n\nnot Randy(dalila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Pearl is nonliteral. Pearl is not cephalic. Marylin is cephalic. Marylin is bicornuous. Marylin is vocal. Marylin is zoic. Joseph is nonliteral. Joseph is vocal. Joseph is echt. Joseph is zoic. Marty is not nonliteral. Marty is metric. If something is metric then it is echt. If Pearl is not nonliteral then Pearl is cephalic. Quiet things are vocal. If something is echt and bicornuous then it is vocal. If Marylin is echt and Marylin is bicornuous then Marylin is metric. Green things are bicornuous. All vocal things are zoic. If something is nonliteral then it is metric. Marty is cephalic.", "logic": "\nNonliteral(pearl)\nnot Cephalic(pearl)\nCephalic(marylin)\nBicornuous(marylin)\nVocal(marylin)\nZoic(marylin)\nNonliteral(joseph)\nVocal(joseph)\nEcht(joseph)\nZoic(joseph)\nnot Nonliteral(marty)\nMetric(marty)\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Echt(x))\nnot Nonliteral(pearl) -> Cephalic(pearl)\nforall x (Cephalic(x) -> Vocal(x))\nforall x (Echt(x) and Bicornuous(x) -> Vocal(x))\nEcht(marylin) and Bicornuous(marylin) -> Metric(marylin)\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Vocal(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Metric(x))\n\nCephalic(marty)\n\nCephalic(marty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The bellina is hallowed. The willdon separate the chan. The willdon is hallowed. The willdon is uninitiate. The paige does not visit the chan. The chan snowball the paige. The chan is hallowed. If someone separate the bellina then the bellina demoralise the chan. If someone is hallowed and they do not eat the paige then the paige demoralise the bellina. If someone snowball the paige and the paige is untethered then the paige does not visit the bellina. If someone separate the chan and they chase the paige then they are not platonic. If the paige does not eat the willdon then the paige snowball the willdon. If someone is platonic then they visit the paige. If the chan is hallowed then the chan separate the bellina. If someone demoralise the chan then the chan is not platonic. The paige does not visit the chan.", "logic": "\nHallowed(bellina)\nSeparate(willdon, chan)\nHallowed(willdon)\nUninitiate(willdon)\nnot Demoralise(paige, chan)\nSnowball(chan, paige)\nHallowed(chan)\nforall x (Separate(x, bellina) -> Demoralise(bellina, chan))\nforall x (Hallowed(x) and not Separate(x, paige) -> Demoralise(paige, bellina))\nforall x (Snowball(x, paige) and Untethered(paige) -> not Demoralise(paige, bellina))\nforall x (Separate(x, chan) and Snowball(x, paige) -> not Platonic(x))\nnot Separate(paige, willdon) -> Snowball(paige, willdon)\nforall x (Platonic(x) -> Demoralise(x, paige))\nHallowed(chan) -> Separate(chan, bellina)\nforall x (Demoralise(x, chan) -> not Platonic(chan))\n\nnot Demoralise(paige, chan)\n\ntherefore not Demoralise(paige, chan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The aili is squat. The gussie fissure the brea. The gussie is squat. The gussie is nubbly. The jannel does not visit the brea. The brea trisect the jannel. The brea is squat. If someone fissure the aili then the aili befog the brea. If someone is squat and they do not eat the jannel then the jannel befog the aili. If someone trisect the jannel and the jannel is bucolic then the jannel does not visit the aili. If someone fissure the brea and they chase the jannel then they are not plumaged. If the jannel does not eat the gussie then the jannel trisect the gussie. If someone is plumaged then they visit the jannel. If the brea is squat then the brea fissure the aili. If someone befog the brea then the brea is not plumaged. The aili is not squat.", "logic": "\nSquat(aili)\nFissure(gussie, brea)\nSquat(gussie)\nNubbly(gussie)\nnot Befog(jannel, brea)\nTrisect(brea, jannel)\nSquat(brea)\nforall x (Fissure(x, aili) -> Befog(aili, brea))\nforall x (Squat(x) and not Fissure(x, jannel) -> Befog(jannel, aili))\nforall x (Trisect(x, jannel) and Bucolic(jannel) -> not Befog(jannel, aili))\nforall x (Fissure(x, brea) and Trisect(x, jannel) -> not Plumaged(x))\nnot Fissure(jannel, gussie) -> Trisect(jannel, gussie)\nforall x (Plumaged(x) -> Befog(x, jannel))\nSquat(brea) -> Fissure(brea, aili)\nforall x (Befog(x, brea) -> not Plumaged(brea))\n\nnot Squat(aili)\n\ntherefore Squat(aili)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The ulrica is monolithic. The ebeneser desecrate the ilse. The ebeneser is monolithic. The ebeneser is unrefined. The rafa does not visit the ilse. The ilse sand the rafa. The ilse is monolithic. If someone desecrate the ulrica then the ulrica idealise the ilse. If someone is monolithic and they do not eat the rafa then the rafa idealise the ulrica. If someone sand the rafa and the rafa is lacerated then the rafa does not visit the ulrica. If someone desecrate the ilse and they chase the rafa then they are not protracted. If the rafa does not eat the ebeneser then the rafa sand the ebeneser. If someone is protracted then they visit the rafa. If the ilse is monolithic then the ilse desecrate the ulrica. If someone idealise the ilse then the ilse is not protracted. The ilse desecrate the ulrica.", "logic": "\nMonolithic(ulrica)\nDesecrate(ebeneser, ilse)\nMonolithic(ebeneser)\nUnrefined(ebeneser)\nnot Idealise(rafa, ilse)\nSand(ilse, rafa)\nMonolithic(ilse)\nforall x (Desecrate(x, ulrica) -> Idealise(ulrica, ilse))\nforall x (Monolithic(x) and not Desecrate(x, rafa) -> Idealise(rafa, ulrica))\nforall x (Sand(x, rafa) and Lacerated(rafa) -> not Idealise(rafa, ulrica))\nforall x (Desecrate(x, ilse) and Sand(x, rafa) -> not Protracted(x))\nnot Desecrate(rafa, ebeneser) -> Sand(rafa, ebeneser)\nforall x (Protracted(x) -> Idealise(x, rafa))\nMonolithic(ilse) -> Desecrate(ilse, ulrica)\nforall x (Idealise(x, ilse) -> not Protracted(ilse))\n\nDesecrate(ilse, ulrica)\n\nMonolithic(ilse) and Monolithic(ilse) -> Desecrate(ilse, ulrica) -> therefore Desecrate(ilse, ulrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The nestor is obligated. The loella hobble the krissy. The loella is obligated. The loella is stuffy. The darcey does not visit the krissy. The krissy instil the darcey. The krissy is obligated. If someone hobble the nestor then the nestor spud the krissy. If someone is obligated and they do not eat the darcey then the darcey spud the nestor. If someone instil the darcey and the darcey is goateed then the darcey does not visit the nestor. If someone hobble the krissy and they chase the darcey then they are not forficate. If the darcey does not eat the loella then the darcey instil the loella. If someone is forficate then they visit the darcey. If the krissy is obligated then the krissy hobble the nestor. If someone spud the krissy then the krissy is not forficate. The krissy does not eat the nestor.", "logic": "\nObligated(nestor)\nHobble(loella, krissy)\nObligated(loella)\nStuffy(loella)\nnot Spud(darcey, krissy)\nInstil(krissy, darcey)\nObligated(krissy)\nforall x (Hobble(x, nestor) -> Spud(nestor, krissy))\nforall x (Obligated(x) and not Hobble(x, darcey) -> Spud(darcey, nestor))\nforall x (Instil(x, darcey) and Goateed(darcey) -> not Spud(darcey, nestor))\nforall x (Hobble(x, krissy) and Instil(x, darcey) -> not Forficate(x))\nnot Hobble(darcey, loella) -> Instil(darcey, loella)\nforall x (Forficate(x) -> Spud(x, darcey))\nObligated(krissy) -> Hobble(krissy, nestor)\nforall x (Spud(x, krissy) -> not Forficate(krissy))\n\nnot Hobble(krissy, nestor)\n\nObligated(krissy) and Obligated(krissy) -> Hobble(krissy, nestor) -> therefore Hobble(krissy, nestor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The mufinella is steroidal. The elysee logroll the noelyn. The elysee is steroidal. The elysee is blithesome. The susanna does not visit the noelyn. The noelyn dump the susanna. The noelyn is steroidal. If someone logroll the mufinella then the mufinella calendar the noelyn. If someone is steroidal and they do not eat the susanna then the susanna calendar the mufinella. If someone dump the susanna and the susanna is eccrine then the susanna does not visit the mufinella. If someone logroll the noelyn and they chase the susanna then they are not sufferable. If the susanna does not eat the elysee then the susanna dump the elysee. If someone is sufferable then they visit the susanna. If the noelyn is steroidal then the noelyn logroll the mufinella. If someone calendar the noelyn then the noelyn is not sufferable. The mufinella calendar the noelyn.", "logic": "\nSteroidal(mufinella)\nLogroll(elysee, noelyn)\nSteroidal(elysee)\nBlithesome(elysee)\nnot Calendar(susanna, noelyn)\nDump(noelyn, susanna)\nSteroidal(noelyn)\nforall x (Logroll(x, mufinella) -> Calendar(mufinella, noelyn))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and not Logroll(x, susanna) -> Calendar(susanna, mufinella))\nforall x (Dump(x, susanna) and Eccrine(susanna) -> not Calendar(susanna, mufinella))\nforall x (Logroll(x, noelyn) and Dump(x, susanna) -> not Sufferable(x))\nnot Logroll(susanna, elysee) -> Dump(susanna, elysee)\nforall x (Sufferable(x) -> Calendar(x, susanna))\nSteroidal(noelyn) -> Logroll(noelyn, mufinella)\nforall x (Calendar(x, noelyn) -> not Sufferable(noelyn))\n\nCalendar(mufinella, noelyn)\n\nSteroidal(noelyn) and Steroidal(noelyn) -> Logroll(noelyn, mufinella) -> therefore Logroll(noelyn, mufinella) Logroll(noelyn, mufinella) and forall x (Logroll(x, mufinella) -> Calendar(mufinella, noelyn)) -> therefore Calendar(mufinella, noelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The benni is axial. The ernesto feature the edsel. The ernesto is axial. The ernesto is moot. The cain does not visit the edsel. The edsel jolt the cain. The edsel is axial. If someone feature the benni then the benni coggle the edsel. If someone is axial and they do not eat the cain then the cain coggle the benni. If someone jolt the cain and the cain is ventilated then the cain does not visit the benni. If someone feature the edsel and they chase the cain then they are not damn. If the cain does not eat the ernesto then the cain jolt the ernesto. If someone is damn then they visit the cain. If the edsel is axial then the edsel feature the benni. If someone coggle the edsel then the edsel is not damn. The benni does not visit the edsel.", "logic": "\nAxial(benni)\nFeature(ernesto, edsel)\nAxial(ernesto)\nMoot(ernesto)\nnot Coggle(cain, edsel)\nJolt(edsel, cain)\nAxial(edsel)\nforall x (Feature(x, benni) -> Coggle(benni, edsel))\nforall x (Axial(x) and not Feature(x, cain) -> Coggle(cain, benni))\nforall x (Jolt(x, cain) and Ventilated(cain) -> not Coggle(cain, benni))\nforall x (Feature(x, edsel) and Jolt(x, cain) -> not Damn(x))\nnot Feature(cain, ernesto) -> Jolt(cain, ernesto)\nforall x (Damn(x) -> Coggle(x, cain))\nAxial(edsel) -> Feature(edsel, benni)\nforall x (Coggle(x, edsel) -> not Damn(edsel))\n\nnot Coggle(benni, edsel)\n\nAxial(edsel) and Axial(edsel) -> Feature(edsel, benni) -> therefore Feature(edsel, benni) Feature(edsel, benni) and forall x (Feature(x, benni) -> Coggle(benni, edsel)) -> therefore Coggle(benni, edsel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The vinny is sagacious. The juliana comfort the tulley. The juliana is sagacious. The juliana is dismaying. The hyacintha does not visit the tulley. The tulley apostatise the hyacintha. The tulley is sagacious. If someone comfort the vinny then the vinny numerate the tulley. If someone is sagacious and they do not eat the hyacintha then the hyacintha numerate the vinny. If someone apostatise the hyacintha and the hyacintha is sunlit then the hyacintha does not visit the vinny. If someone comfort the tulley and they chase the hyacintha then they are not reviving. If the hyacintha does not eat the juliana then the hyacintha apostatise the juliana. If someone is reviving then they visit the hyacintha. If the tulley is sagacious then the tulley comfort the vinny. If someone numerate the tulley then the tulley is not reviving. The tulley is not reviving.", "logic": "\nSagacious(vinny)\nComfort(juliana, tulley)\nSagacious(juliana)\nDismaying(juliana)\nnot Numerate(hyacintha, tulley)\nApostatise(tulley, hyacintha)\nSagacious(tulley)\nforall x (Comfort(x, vinny) -> Numerate(vinny, tulley))\nforall x (Sagacious(x) and not Comfort(x, hyacintha) -> Numerate(hyacintha, vinny))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, hyacintha) and Sunlit(hyacintha) -> not Numerate(hyacintha, vinny))\nforall x (Comfort(x, tulley) and Apostatise(x, hyacintha) -> not Reviving(x))\nnot Comfort(hyacintha, juliana) -> Apostatise(hyacintha, juliana)\nforall x (Reviving(x) -> Numerate(x, hyacintha))\nSagacious(tulley) -> Comfort(tulley, vinny)\nforall x (Numerate(x, tulley) -> not Reviving(tulley))\n\nnot Reviving(tulley)\n\nSagacious(tulley) and Sagacious(tulley) -> Comfort(tulley, vinny) -> therefore Comfort(tulley, vinny) Comfort(tulley, vinny) and forall x (Comfort(x, vinny) -> Numerate(vinny, tulley)) -> therefore Numerate(vinny, tulley) Numerate(vinny, tulley) and forall x (Numerate(x, tulley) -> not Reviving(tulley)) -> therefore not Reviving(tulley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The ronda is swingeing. The brina flay the wendell. The brina is swingeing. The brina is given. The juanita does not visit the wendell. The wendell overjoy the juanita. The wendell is swingeing. If someone flay the ronda then the ronda edge the wendell. If someone is swingeing and they do not eat the juanita then the juanita edge the ronda. If someone overjoy the juanita and the juanita is deckled then the juanita does not visit the ronda. If someone flay the wendell and they chase the juanita then they are not variolous. If the juanita does not eat the brina then the juanita overjoy the brina. If someone is variolous then they visit the juanita. If the wendell is swingeing then the wendell flay the ronda. If someone edge the wendell then the wendell is not variolous. The wendell is variolous.", "logic": "\nSwingeing(ronda)\nFlay(brina, wendell)\nSwingeing(brina)\nGiven(brina)\nnot Edge(juanita, wendell)\nOverjoy(wendell, juanita)\nSwingeing(wendell)\nforall x (Flay(x, ronda) -> Edge(ronda, wendell))\nforall x (Swingeing(x) and not Flay(x, juanita) -> Edge(juanita, ronda))\nforall x (Overjoy(x, juanita) and Deckled(juanita) -> not Edge(juanita, ronda))\nforall x (Flay(x, wendell) and Overjoy(x, juanita) -> not Variolous(x))\nnot Flay(juanita, brina) -> Overjoy(juanita, brina)\nforall x (Variolous(x) -> Edge(x, juanita))\nSwingeing(wendell) -> Flay(wendell, ronda)\nforall x (Edge(x, wendell) -> not Variolous(wendell))\n\nVariolous(wendell)\n\nSwingeing(wendell) and Swingeing(wendell) -> Flay(wendell, ronda) -> therefore Flay(wendell, ronda) Flay(wendell, ronda) and forall x (Flay(x, ronda) -> Edge(ronda, wendell)) -> therefore Edge(ronda, wendell) Edge(ronda, wendell) and forall x (Edge(x, wendell) -> not Variolous(wendell)) -> therefore not Variolous(wendell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The arline is prenuptial. The fanny insure the remington. The fanny is prenuptial. The fanny is unangry. The ivory does not visit the remington. The remington deterge the ivory. The remington is prenuptial. If someone insure the arline then the arline defervesce the remington. If someone is prenuptial and they do not eat the ivory then the ivory defervesce the arline. If someone deterge the ivory and the ivory is hardcore then the ivory does not visit the arline. If someone insure the remington and they chase the ivory then they are not spent. If the ivory does not eat the fanny then the ivory deterge the fanny. If someone is spent then they visit the ivory. If the remington is prenuptial then the remington insure the arline. If someone defervesce the remington then the remington is not spent. The ivory does not visit the ivory.", "logic": "\nPrenuptial(arline)\nInsure(fanny, remington)\nPrenuptial(fanny)\nUnangry(fanny)\nnot Defervesce(ivory, remington)\nDeterge(remington, ivory)\nPrenuptial(remington)\nforall x (Insure(x, arline) -> Defervesce(arline, remington))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) and not Insure(x, ivory) -> Defervesce(ivory, arline))\nforall x (Deterge(x, ivory) and Hardcore(ivory) -> not Defervesce(ivory, arline))\nforall x (Insure(x, remington) and Deterge(x, ivory) -> not Spent(x))\nnot Insure(ivory, fanny) -> Deterge(ivory, fanny)\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Defervesce(x, ivory))\nPrenuptial(remington) -> Insure(remington, arline)\nforall x (Defervesce(x, remington) -> not Spent(remington))\n\nnot Defervesce(ivory, ivory)\n\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Defervesce(x, ivory)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The ashton is rainless. The darrin overfeed the sayres. The darrin is rainless. The darrin is burbling. The toinette does not visit the sayres. The sayres woosh the toinette. The sayres is rainless. If someone overfeed the ashton then the ashton feature the sayres. If someone is rainless and they do not eat the toinette then the toinette feature the ashton. If someone woosh the toinette and the toinette is hourly then the toinette does not visit the ashton. If someone overfeed the sayres and they chase the toinette then they are not political. If the toinette does not eat the darrin then the toinette woosh the darrin. If someone is political then they visit the toinette. If the sayres is rainless then the sayres overfeed the ashton. If someone feature the sayres then the sayres is not political. The toinette woosh the darrin.", "logic": "\nRainless(ashton)\nOverfeed(darrin, sayres)\nRainless(darrin)\nBurbling(darrin)\nnot Feature(toinette, sayres)\nWoosh(sayres, toinette)\nRainless(sayres)\nforall x (Overfeed(x, ashton) -> Feature(ashton, sayres))\nforall x (Rainless(x) and not Overfeed(x, toinette) -> Feature(toinette, ashton))\nforall x (Woosh(x, toinette) and Hourly(toinette) -> not Feature(toinette, ashton))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, sayres) and Woosh(x, toinette) -> not Political(x))\nnot Overfeed(toinette, darrin) -> Woosh(toinette, darrin)\nforall x (Political(x) -> Feature(x, toinette))\nRainless(sayres) -> Overfeed(sayres, ashton)\nforall x (Feature(x, sayres) -> not Political(sayres))\n\nWoosh(toinette, darrin)\n\nnot Overfeed(toinette, darrin) -> Woosh(toinette, darrin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The shirley is preceding. The murdock amble the roderick. The murdock is preceding. The murdock is atonic. The delphinia does not visit the roderick. The roderick smatter the delphinia. The roderick is preceding. If someone amble the shirley then the shirley chaff the roderick. If someone is preceding and they do not eat the delphinia then the delphinia chaff the shirley. If someone smatter the delphinia and the delphinia is brutal then the delphinia does not visit the shirley. If someone amble the roderick and they chase the delphinia then they are not certain. If the delphinia does not eat the murdock then the delphinia smatter the murdock. If someone is certain then they visit the delphinia. If the roderick is preceding then the roderick amble the shirley. If someone chaff the roderick then the roderick is not certain. The shirley does not visit the delphinia.", "logic": "\nPreceding(shirley)\nAmble(murdock, roderick)\nPreceding(murdock)\nAtonic(murdock)\nnot Chaff(delphinia, roderick)\nSmatter(roderick, delphinia)\nPreceding(roderick)\nforall x (Amble(x, shirley) -> Chaff(shirley, roderick))\nforall x (Preceding(x) and not Amble(x, delphinia) -> Chaff(delphinia, shirley))\nforall x (Smatter(x, delphinia) and Brutal(delphinia) -> not Chaff(delphinia, shirley))\nforall x (Amble(x, roderick) and Smatter(x, delphinia) -> not Certain(x))\nnot Amble(delphinia, murdock) -> Smatter(delphinia, murdock)\nforall x (Certain(x) -> Chaff(x, delphinia))\nPreceding(roderick) -> Amble(roderick, shirley)\nforall x (Chaff(x, roderick) -> not Certain(roderick))\n\nnot Chaff(shirley, delphinia)\n\nforall x (Certain(x) -> Chaff(x, delphinia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The sapphira is chlorotic. The tamma retard the elias. The tamma is chlorotic. The tamma is myoid. The louis does not visit the elias. The elias reforest the louis. The elias is chlorotic. If someone retard the sapphira then the sapphira overthrow the elias. If someone is chlorotic and they do not eat the louis then the louis overthrow the sapphira. If someone reforest the louis and the louis is stocked then the louis does not visit the sapphira. If someone retard the elias and they chase the louis then they are not evoked. If the louis does not eat the tamma then the louis reforest the tamma. If someone is evoked then they visit the louis. If the elias is chlorotic then the elias retard the sapphira. If someone overthrow the elias then the elias is not evoked. The elias overthrow the louis.", "logic": "\nChlorotic(sapphira)\nRetard(tamma, elias)\nChlorotic(tamma)\nMyoid(tamma)\nnot Overthrow(louis, elias)\nReforest(elias, louis)\nChlorotic(elias)\nforall x (Retard(x, sapphira) -> Overthrow(sapphira, elias))\nforall x (Chlorotic(x) and not Retard(x, louis) -> Overthrow(louis, sapphira))\nforall x (Reforest(x, louis) and Stocked(louis) -> not Overthrow(louis, sapphira))\nforall x (Retard(x, elias) and Reforest(x, louis) -> not Evoked(x))\nnot Retard(louis, tamma) -> Reforest(louis, tamma)\nforall x (Evoked(x) -> Overthrow(x, louis))\nChlorotic(elias) -> Retard(elias, sapphira)\nforall x (Overthrow(x, elias) -> not Evoked(elias))\n\nOverthrow(elias, louis)\n\nforall x (Evoked(x) -> Overthrow(x, louis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The johnny is porticoed. The matthieu shampoo the carline. The matthieu is porticoed. The matthieu is ecumenical. The shalom does not visit the carline. The carline prove the shalom. The carline is porticoed. If someone shampoo the johnny then the johnny singsong the carline. If someone is porticoed and they do not eat the shalom then the shalom singsong the johnny. If someone prove the shalom and the shalom is redeemable then the shalom does not visit the johnny. If someone shampoo the carline and they chase the shalom then they are not silicious. If the shalom does not eat the matthieu then the shalom prove the matthieu. If someone is silicious then they visit the shalom. If the carline is porticoed then the carline shampoo the johnny. If someone singsong the carline then the carline is not silicious. The johnny does not chase the matthieu.", "logic": "\nPorticoed(johnny)\nShampoo(matthieu, carline)\nPorticoed(matthieu)\nEcumenical(matthieu)\nnot Singsong(shalom, carline)\nProve(carline, shalom)\nPorticoed(carline)\nforall x (Shampoo(x, johnny) -> Singsong(johnny, carline))\nforall x (Porticoed(x) and not Shampoo(x, shalom) -> Singsong(shalom, johnny))\nforall x (Prove(x, shalom) and Redeemable(shalom) -> not Singsong(shalom, johnny))\nforall x (Shampoo(x, carline) and Prove(x, shalom) -> not Silicious(x))\nnot Shampoo(shalom, matthieu) -> Prove(shalom, matthieu)\nforall x (Silicious(x) -> Singsong(x, shalom))\nPorticoed(carline) -> Shampoo(carline, johnny)\nforall x (Singsong(x, carline) -> not Silicious(carline))\n\nnot Prove(johnny, matthieu)\n\nnot Prove(johnny, matthieu) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The darell is lachrymal. The genevieve obsess the carolina. The genevieve is lachrymal. The genevieve is converted. The odele does not visit the carolina. The carolina atrophy the odele. The carolina is lachrymal. If someone obsess the darell then the darell docket the carolina. If someone is lachrymal and they do not eat the odele then the odele docket the darell. If someone atrophy the odele and the odele is same then the odele does not visit the darell. If someone obsess the carolina and they chase the odele then they are not araneidan. If the odele does not eat the genevieve then the odele atrophy the genevieve. If someone is araneidan then they visit the odele. If the carolina is lachrymal then the carolina obsess the darell. If someone docket the carolina then the carolina is not araneidan. The darell is converted.", "logic": "\nLachrymal(darell)\nObsess(genevieve, carolina)\nLachrymal(genevieve)\nConverted(genevieve)\nnot Docket(odele, carolina)\nAtrophy(carolina, odele)\nLachrymal(carolina)\nforall x (Obsess(x, darell) -> Docket(darell, carolina))\nforall x (Lachrymal(x) and not Obsess(x, odele) -> Docket(odele, darell))\nforall x (Atrophy(x, odele) and Same(odele) -> not Docket(odele, darell))\nforall x (Obsess(x, carolina) and Atrophy(x, odele) -> not Araneidan(x))\nnot Obsess(odele, genevieve) -> Atrophy(odele, genevieve)\nforall x (Araneidan(x) -> Docket(x, odele))\nLachrymal(carolina) -> Obsess(carolina, darell)\nforall x (Docket(x, carolina) -> not Araneidan(carolina))\n\nConverted(darell)\n\nConverted(darell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The lyndon is lanky. The ebony start the willette. The ebony is lanky. The ebony is wayfaring. The leonanie does not visit the willette. The willette affront the leonanie. The willette is lanky. If someone start the lyndon then the lyndon scollop the willette. If someone is lanky and they do not eat the leonanie then the leonanie scollop the lyndon. If someone affront the leonanie and the leonanie is said then the leonanie does not visit the lyndon. If someone start the willette and they chase the leonanie then they are not surpliced. If the leonanie does not eat the ebony then the leonanie affront the ebony. If someone is surpliced then they visit the leonanie. If the willette is lanky then the willette start the lyndon. If someone scollop the willette then the willette is not surpliced. The lyndon is not rough.", "logic": "\nLanky(lyndon)\nStart(ebony, willette)\nLanky(ebony)\nWayfaring(ebony)\nnot Scollop(leonanie, willette)\nAffront(willette, leonanie)\nLanky(willette)\nforall x (Start(x, lyndon) -> Scollop(lyndon, willette))\nforall x (Lanky(x) and not Start(x, leonanie) -> Scollop(leonanie, lyndon))\nforall x (Affront(x, leonanie) and Said(leonanie) -> not Scollop(leonanie, lyndon))\nforall x (Start(x, willette) and Affront(x, leonanie) -> not Surpliced(x))\nnot Start(leonanie, ebony) -> Affront(leonanie, ebony)\nforall x (Surpliced(x) -> Scollop(x, leonanie))\nLanky(willette) -> Start(willette, lyndon)\nforall x (Scollop(x, willette) -> not Surpliced(willette))\n\nnot Rough(lyndon)\n\nnot Rough(lyndon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The valeda is tartarean. The karil yield the stanford. The karil is tartarean. The karil is mammary. The lilias does not visit the stanford. The stanford pulse the lilias. The stanford is tartarean. If someone yield the valeda then the valeda treasure the stanford. If someone is tartarean and they do not eat the lilias then the lilias treasure the valeda. If someone pulse the lilias and the lilias is septuple then the lilias does not visit the valeda. If someone yield the stanford and they chase the lilias then they are not crabwise. If the lilias does not eat the karil then the lilias pulse the karil. If someone is crabwise then they visit the lilias. If the stanford is tartarean then the stanford yield the valeda. If someone treasure the stanford then the stanford is not crabwise. The karil pulse the valeda.", "logic": "\nTartarean(valeda)\nYield(karil, stanford)\nTartarean(karil)\nMammary(karil)\nnot Treasure(lilias, stanford)\nPulse(stanford, lilias)\nTartarean(stanford)\nforall x (Yield(x, valeda) -> Treasure(valeda, stanford))\nforall x (Tartarean(x) and not Yield(x, lilias) -> Treasure(lilias, valeda))\nforall x (Pulse(x, lilias) and Septuple(lilias) -> not Treasure(lilias, valeda))\nforall x (Yield(x, stanford) and Pulse(x, lilias) -> not Crabwise(x))\nnot Yield(lilias, karil) -> Pulse(lilias, karil)\nforall x (Crabwise(x) -> Treasure(x, lilias))\nTartarean(stanford) -> Yield(stanford, valeda)\nforall x (Treasure(x, stanford) -> not Crabwise(stanford))\n\nPulse(karil, valeda)\n\nPulse(karil, valeda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-586"} {"premises": "The doralyn curtain the sanford. The doralyn is punishable. The doralyn collar the giff. The sanford curtain the doralyn. The sanford is forged. The auroora is returning. The giff is punishing. If something inseminate the doralyn then the doralyn inseminate the sanford. If something curtain the doralyn then the doralyn is punishing. If the sanford inseminate the auroora then the sanford is punishing. If something collar the doralyn then it is forged. If the doralyn collar the auroora and the doralyn inseminate the auroora then the doralyn inseminate the sanford. If something inseminate the doralyn then the doralyn is punishable. If the doralyn is returning then the doralyn inseminate the sanford. If something is punishing then it is returning. The giff is punishing.", "logic": "\nCurtain(doralyn, sanford)\nPunishable(doralyn)\nCollar(doralyn, giff)\nCurtain(sanford, doralyn)\nForged(sanford)\nReturning(auroora)\nPunishing(giff)\nforall x (Inseminate(x, doralyn) -> Inseminate(doralyn, sanford))\nforall x (Curtain(x, doralyn) -> Punishing(doralyn))\nInseminate(sanford, auroora) -> Punishing(sanford)\nforall x (Collar(x, doralyn) -> Forged(x))\nCollar(doralyn, auroora) and Inseminate(doralyn, auroora) -> Inseminate(doralyn, sanford)\nforall x (Inseminate(x, doralyn) -> Punishable(doralyn))\nReturning(doralyn) -> Inseminate(doralyn, sanford)\nforall x (Punishing(x) -> Returning(x))\n\nPunishing(giff)\n\ntherefore Punishing(giff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The leroy theorise the wesley. The leroy is chewy. The leroy nictate the marysa. The wesley theorise the leroy. The wesley is olivelike. The ginnie is grapy. The marysa is iridescent. If something cotton the leroy then the leroy cotton the wesley. If something theorise the leroy then the leroy is iridescent. If the wesley cotton the ginnie then the wesley is iridescent. If something nictate the leroy then it is olivelike. If the leroy nictate the ginnie and the leroy cotton the ginnie then the leroy cotton the wesley. If something cotton the leroy then the leroy is chewy. If the leroy is grapy then the leroy cotton the wesley. If something is iridescent then it is grapy. The leroy does not visit the marysa.", "logic": "\nTheorise(leroy, wesley)\nChewy(leroy)\nNictate(leroy, marysa)\nTheorise(wesley, leroy)\nOlivelike(wesley)\nGrapy(ginnie)\nIridescent(marysa)\nforall x (Cotton(x, leroy) -> Cotton(leroy, wesley))\nforall x (Theorise(x, leroy) -> Iridescent(leroy))\nCotton(wesley, ginnie) -> Iridescent(wesley)\nforall x (Nictate(x, leroy) -> Olivelike(x))\nNictate(leroy, ginnie) and Cotton(leroy, ginnie) -> Cotton(leroy, wesley)\nforall x (Cotton(x, leroy) -> Chewy(leroy))\nGrapy(leroy) -> Cotton(leroy, wesley)\nforall x (Iridescent(x) -> Grapy(x))\n\nnot Nictate(leroy, marysa)\n\ntherefore Nictate(leroy, marysa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The gwendolyn aliment the sadella. The gwendolyn is graded. The gwendolyn affright the teodoro. The sadella aliment the gwendolyn. The sadella is desiccated. The vic is monaural. The teodoro is pinnate. If something sleek the gwendolyn then the gwendolyn sleek the sadella. If something aliment the gwendolyn then the gwendolyn is pinnate. If the sadella sleek the vic then the sadella is pinnate. If something affright the gwendolyn then it is desiccated. If the gwendolyn affright the vic and the gwendolyn sleek the vic then the gwendolyn sleek the sadella. If something sleek the gwendolyn then the gwendolyn is graded. If the gwendolyn is monaural then the gwendolyn sleek the sadella. If something is pinnate then it is monaural. The gwendolyn is pinnate.", "logic": "\nAliment(gwendolyn, sadella)\nGraded(gwendolyn)\nAffright(gwendolyn, teodoro)\nAliment(sadella, gwendolyn)\nDesiccated(sadella)\nMonaural(vic)\nPinnate(teodoro)\nforall x (Sleek(x, gwendolyn) -> Sleek(gwendolyn, sadella))\nforall x (Aliment(x, gwendolyn) -> Pinnate(gwendolyn))\nSleek(sadella, vic) -> Pinnate(sadella)\nforall x (Affright(x, gwendolyn) -> Desiccated(x))\nAffright(gwendolyn, vic) and Sleek(gwendolyn, vic) -> Sleek(gwendolyn, sadella)\nforall x (Sleek(x, gwendolyn) -> Graded(gwendolyn))\nMonaural(gwendolyn) -> Sleek(gwendolyn, sadella)\nforall x (Pinnate(x) -> Monaural(x))\n\nPinnate(gwendolyn)\n\nAliment(sadella, gwendolyn) and forall x (Aliment(x, gwendolyn) -> Pinnate(gwendolyn)) -> therefore Pinnate(gwendolyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The easter cosh the henriette. The easter is meiotic. The easter sheer the englebart. The henriette cosh the easter. The henriette is minoan. The susy is reassuring. The englebart is ebracteate. If something chlorinate the easter then the easter chlorinate the henriette. If something cosh the easter then the easter is ebracteate. If the henriette chlorinate the susy then the henriette is ebracteate. If something sheer the easter then it is minoan. If the easter sheer the susy and the easter chlorinate the susy then the easter chlorinate the henriette. If something chlorinate the easter then the easter is meiotic. If the easter is reassuring then the easter chlorinate the henriette. If something is ebracteate then it is reassuring. The easter is not ebracteate.", "logic": "\nCosh(easter, henriette)\nMeiotic(easter)\nSheer(easter, englebart)\nCosh(henriette, easter)\nMinoan(henriette)\nReassuring(susy)\nEbracteate(englebart)\nforall x (Chlorinate(x, easter) -> Chlorinate(easter, henriette))\nforall x (Cosh(x, easter) -> Ebracteate(easter))\nChlorinate(henriette, susy) -> Ebracteate(henriette)\nforall x (Sheer(x, easter) -> Minoan(x))\nSheer(easter, susy) and Chlorinate(easter, susy) -> Chlorinate(easter, henriette)\nforall x (Chlorinate(x, easter) -> Meiotic(easter))\nReassuring(easter) -> Chlorinate(easter, henriette)\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) -> Reassuring(x))\n\nnot Ebracteate(easter)\n\nCosh(henriette, easter) and forall x (Cosh(x, easter) -> Ebracteate(easter)) -> therefore Ebracteate(easter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The dory combust the cosmo. The dory is arctic. The dory retick the layney. The cosmo combust the dory. The cosmo is albinic. The karly is replete. The layney is lithic. If something scroll the dory then the dory scroll the cosmo. If something combust the dory then the dory is lithic. If the cosmo scroll the karly then the cosmo is lithic. If something retick the dory then it is albinic. If the dory retick the karly and the dory scroll the karly then the dory scroll the cosmo. If something scroll the dory then the dory is arctic. If the dory is replete then the dory scroll the cosmo. If something is lithic then it is replete. The dory is replete.", "logic": "\nCombust(dory, cosmo)\nArctic(dory)\nRetick(dory, layney)\nCombust(cosmo, dory)\nAlbinic(cosmo)\nReplete(karly)\nLithic(layney)\nforall x (Scroll(x, dory) -> Scroll(dory, cosmo))\nforall x (Combust(x, dory) -> Lithic(dory))\nScroll(cosmo, karly) -> Lithic(cosmo)\nforall x (Retick(x, dory) -> Albinic(x))\nRetick(dory, karly) and Scroll(dory, karly) -> Scroll(dory, cosmo)\nforall x (Scroll(x, dory) -> Arctic(dory))\nReplete(dory) -> Scroll(dory, cosmo)\nforall x (Lithic(x) -> Replete(x))\n\nReplete(dory)\n\nCombust(cosmo, dory) and forall x (Combust(x, dory) -> Lithic(dory)) -> therefore Lithic(dory) Lithic(dory) and forall x (Lithic(x) -> Replete(x)) -> therefore Replete(dory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The winonah bach the will. The winonah is amorous. The winonah maul the torry. The will bach the winonah. The will is caespitose. The neel is interbred. The torry is extempore. If something welcome the winonah then the winonah welcome the will. If something bach the winonah then the winonah is extempore. If the will welcome the neel then the will is extempore. If something maul the winonah then it is caespitose. If the winonah maul the neel and the winonah welcome the neel then the winonah welcome the will. If something welcome the winonah then the winonah is amorous. If the winonah is interbred then the winonah welcome the will. If something is extempore then it is interbred. The winonah is not interbred.", "logic": "\nBach(winonah, will)\nAmorous(winonah)\nMaul(winonah, torry)\nBach(will, winonah)\nCaespitose(will)\nInterbred(neel)\nExtempore(torry)\nforall x (Welcome(x, winonah) -> Welcome(winonah, will))\nforall x (Bach(x, winonah) -> Extempore(winonah))\nWelcome(will, neel) -> Extempore(will)\nforall x (Maul(x, winonah) -> Caespitose(x))\nMaul(winonah, neel) and Welcome(winonah, neel) -> Welcome(winonah, will)\nforall x (Welcome(x, winonah) -> Amorous(winonah))\nInterbred(winonah) -> Welcome(winonah, will)\nforall x (Extempore(x) -> Interbred(x))\n\nnot Interbred(winonah)\n\nBach(will, winonah) and forall x (Bach(x, winonah) -> Extempore(winonah)) -> therefore Extempore(winonah) Extempore(winonah) and forall x (Extempore(x) -> Interbred(x)) -> therefore Interbred(winonah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The quintana gauge the randall. The quintana is knightly. The quintana labor the taylor. The randall gauge the quintana. The randall is skyward. The marc is ladylike. The taylor is weird. If something parboil the quintana then the quintana parboil the randall. If something gauge the quintana then the quintana is weird. If the randall parboil the marc then the randall is weird. If something labor the quintana then it is skyward. If the quintana labor the marc and the quintana parboil the marc then the quintana parboil the randall. If something parboil the quintana then the quintana is knightly. If the quintana is ladylike then the quintana parboil the randall. If something is weird then it is ladylike. The quintana parboil the randall.", "logic": "\nGauge(quintana, randall)\nKnightly(quintana)\nLabor(quintana, taylor)\nGauge(randall, quintana)\nSkyward(randall)\nLadylike(marc)\nWeird(taylor)\nforall x (Parboil(x, quintana) -> Parboil(quintana, randall))\nforall x (Gauge(x, quintana) -> Weird(quintana))\nParboil(randall, marc) -> Weird(randall)\nforall x (Labor(x, quintana) -> Skyward(x))\nLabor(quintana, marc) and Parboil(quintana, marc) -> Parboil(quintana, randall)\nforall x (Parboil(x, quintana) -> Knightly(quintana))\nLadylike(quintana) -> Parboil(quintana, randall)\nforall x (Weird(x) -> Ladylike(x))\n\nParboil(quintana, randall)\n\nGauge(randall, quintana) and forall x (Gauge(x, quintana) -> Weird(quintana)) -> therefore Weird(quintana) Weird(quintana) and forall x (Weird(x) -> Ladylike(x)) -> therefore Ladylike(quintana) Ladylike(quintana) and Ladylike(quintana) -> Parboil(quintana, randall) -> therefore Parboil(quintana, randall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The stuart recline the effie. The stuart is galled. The stuart trade the aina. The effie recline the stuart. The effie is revengeful. The petey is running. The aina is depraved. If something cripple the stuart then the stuart cripple the effie. If something recline the stuart then the stuart is depraved. If the effie cripple the petey then the effie is depraved. If something trade the stuart then it is revengeful. If the stuart trade the petey and the stuart cripple the petey then the stuart cripple the effie. If something cripple the stuart then the stuart is galled. If the stuart is running then the stuart cripple the effie. If something is depraved then it is running. The stuart does not see the effie.", "logic": "\nRecline(stuart, effie)\nGalled(stuart)\nTrade(stuart, aina)\nRecline(effie, stuart)\nRevengeful(effie)\nRunning(petey)\nDepraved(aina)\nforall x (Cripple(x, stuart) -> Cripple(stuart, effie))\nforall x (Recline(x, stuart) -> Depraved(stuart))\nCripple(effie, petey) -> Depraved(effie)\nforall x (Trade(x, stuart) -> Revengeful(x))\nTrade(stuart, petey) and Cripple(stuart, petey) -> Cripple(stuart, effie)\nforall x (Cripple(x, stuart) -> Galled(stuart))\nRunning(stuart) -> Cripple(stuart, effie)\nforall x (Depraved(x) -> Running(x))\n\nnot Cripple(stuart, effie)\n\nRecline(effie, stuart) and forall x (Recline(x, stuart) -> Depraved(stuart)) -> therefore Depraved(stuart) Depraved(stuart) and forall x (Depraved(x) -> Running(x)) -> therefore Running(stuart) Running(stuart) and Running(stuart) -> Cripple(stuart, effie) -> therefore Cripple(stuart, effie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The olva overspend the ralph. The olva is unvaried. The olva animadvert the waylin. The ralph overspend the olva. The ralph is insurable. The sussi is scummy. The waylin is tannic. If something bristle the olva then the olva bristle the ralph. If something overspend the olva then the olva is tannic. If the ralph bristle the sussi then the ralph is tannic. If something animadvert the olva then it is insurable. If the olva animadvert the sussi and the olva bristle the sussi then the olva bristle the ralph. If something bristle the olva then the olva is unvaried. If the olva is scummy then the olva bristle the ralph. If something is tannic then it is scummy. The waylin is not insurable.", "logic": "\nOverspend(olva, ralph)\nUnvaried(olva)\nAnimadvert(olva, waylin)\nOverspend(ralph, olva)\nInsurable(ralph)\nScummy(sussi)\nTannic(waylin)\nforall x (Bristle(x, olva) -> Bristle(olva, ralph))\nforall x (Overspend(x, olva) -> Tannic(olva))\nBristle(ralph, sussi) -> Tannic(ralph)\nforall x (Animadvert(x, olva) -> Insurable(x))\nAnimadvert(olva, sussi) and Bristle(olva, sussi) -> Bristle(olva, ralph)\nforall x (Bristle(x, olva) -> Unvaried(olva))\nScummy(olva) -> Bristle(olva, ralph)\nforall x (Tannic(x) -> Scummy(x))\n\nnot Insurable(waylin)\n\nforall x (Animadvert(x, olva) -> Insurable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The zora swob the prentice. The zora is ubiquitous. The zora defervesce the eldon. The prentice swob the zora. The prentice is forward. The aurelia is affected. The eldon is batty. If something snuff the zora then the zora snuff the prentice. If something swob the zora then the zora is batty. If the prentice snuff the aurelia then the prentice is batty. If something defervesce the zora then it is forward. If the zora defervesce the aurelia and the zora snuff the aurelia then the zora snuff the prentice. If something snuff the zora then the zora is ubiquitous. If the zora is affected then the zora snuff the prentice. If something is batty then it is affected. The aurelia is forward.", "logic": "\nSwob(zora, prentice)\nUbiquitous(zora)\nDefervesce(zora, eldon)\nSwob(prentice, zora)\nForward(prentice)\nAffected(aurelia)\nBatty(eldon)\nforall x (Snuff(x, zora) -> Snuff(zora, prentice))\nforall x (Swob(x, zora) -> Batty(zora))\nSnuff(prentice, aurelia) -> Batty(prentice)\nforall x (Defervesce(x, zora) -> Forward(x))\nDefervesce(zora, aurelia) and Snuff(zora, aurelia) -> Snuff(zora, prentice)\nforall x (Snuff(x, zora) -> Ubiquitous(zora))\nAffected(zora) -> Snuff(zora, prentice)\nforall x (Batty(x) -> Affected(x))\n\nForward(aurelia)\n\nforall x (Defervesce(x, zora) -> Forward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The tarrant administer the calley. The tarrant is frigid. The tarrant waterproof the ettie. The calley administer the tarrant. The calley is inclined. The freddi is vermillion. The ettie is predacious. If something test the tarrant then the tarrant test the calley. If something administer the tarrant then the tarrant is predacious. If the calley test the freddi then the calley is predacious. If something waterproof the tarrant then it is inclined. If the tarrant waterproof the freddi and the tarrant test the freddi then the tarrant test the calley. If something test the tarrant then the tarrant is frigid. If the tarrant is vermillion then the tarrant test the calley. If something is predacious then it is vermillion. The tarrant is not inclined.", "logic": "\nAdminister(tarrant, calley)\nFrigid(tarrant)\nWaterproof(tarrant, ettie)\nAdminister(calley, tarrant)\nInclined(calley)\nVermillion(freddi)\nPredacious(ettie)\nforall x (Test(x, tarrant) -> Test(tarrant, calley))\nforall x (Administer(x, tarrant) -> Predacious(tarrant))\nTest(calley, freddi) -> Predacious(calley)\nforall x (Waterproof(x, tarrant) -> Inclined(x))\nWaterproof(tarrant, freddi) and Test(tarrant, freddi) -> Test(tarrant, calley)\nforall x (Test(x, tarrant) -> Frigid(tarrant))\nVermillion(tarrant) -> Test(tarrant, calley)\nforall x (Predacious(x) -> Vermillion(x))\n\nnot Inclined(tarrant)\n\nforall x (Waterproof(x, tarrant) -> Inclined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The alina reiterate the felecia. The alina is wholesome. The alina level the ronen. The felecia reiterate the alina. The felecia is blond. The sherwood is palish. The ronen is flaccid. If something coerce the alina then the alina coerce the felecia. If something reiterate the alina then the alina is flaccid. If the felecia coerce the sherwood then the felecia is flaccid. If something level the alina then it is blond. If the alina level the sherwood and the alina coerce the sherwood then the alina coerce the felecia. If something coerce the alina then the alina is wholesome. If the alina is palish then the alina coerce the felecia. If something is flaccid then it is palish. The felecia is palish.", "logic": "\nReiterate(alina, felecia)\nWholesome(alina)\nLevel(alina, ronen)\nReiterate(felecia, alina)\nBlond(felecia)\nPalish(sherwood)\nFlaccid(ronen)\nforall x (Coerce(x, alina) -> Coerce(alina, felecia))\nforall x (Reiterate(x, alina) -> Flaccid(alina))\nCoerce(felecia, sherwood) -> Flaccid(felecia)\nforall x (Level(x, alina) -> Blond(x))\nLevel(alina, sherwood) and Coerce(alina, sherwood) -> Coerce(alina, felecia)\nforall x (Coerce(x, alina) -> Wholesome(alina))\nPalish(alina) -> Coerce(alina, felecia)\nforall x (Flaccid(x) -> Palish(x))\n\nPalish(felecia)\n\nforall x (Flaccid(x) -> Palish(x)) <- Coerce(felecia, sherwood) -> Flaccid(felecia) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The valery fulfil the stefanie. The valery is mousey. The valery exempt the thom. The stefanie fulfil the valery. The stefanie is shrinkable. The delores is disputed. The thom is disorderly. If something recidivate the valery then the valery recidivate the stefanie. If something fulfil the valery then the valery is disorderly. If the stefanie recidivate the delores then the stefanie is disorderly. If something exempt the valery then it is shrinkable. If the valery exempt the delores and the valery recidivate the delores then the valery recidivate the stefanie. If something recidivate the valery then the valery is mousey. If the valery is disputed then the valery recidivate the stefanie. If something is disorderly then it is disputed. The stefanie does not see the thom.", "logic": "\nFulfil(valery, stefanie)\nMousey(valery)\nExempt(valery, thom)\nFulfil(stefanie, valery)\nShrinkable(stefanie)\nDisputed(delores)\nDisorderly(thom)\nforall x (Recidivate(x, valery) -> Recidivate(valery, stefanie))\nforall x (Fulfil(x, valery) -> Disorderly(valery))\nRecidivate(stefanie, delores) -> Disorderly(stefanie)\nforall x (Exempt(x, valery) -> Shrinkable(x))\nExempt(valery, delores) and Recidivate(valery, delores) -> Recidivate(valery, stefanie)\nforall x (Recidivate(x, valery) -> Mousey(valery))\nDisputed(valery) -> Recidivate(valery, stefanie)\nforall x (Disorderly(x) -> Disputed(x))\n\nnot Recidivate(stefanie, thom)\n\nnot Recidivate(stefanie, thom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The tiebout consume the gordan. The tiebout is agonizing. The tiebout rebuild the fiorenze. The gordan consume the tiebout. The gordan is marketable. The aldwin is cubistic. The fiorenze is polemic. If something roneo the tiebout then the tiebout roneo the gordan. If something consume the tiebout then the tiebout is polemic. If the gordan roneo the aldwin then the gordan is polemic. If something rebuild the tiebout then it is marketable. If the tiebout rebuild the aldwin and the tiebout roneo the aldwin then the tiebout roneo the gordan. If something roneo the tiebout then the tiebout is agonizing. If the tiebout is cubistic then the tiebout roneo the gordan. If something is polemic then it is cubistic. The gordan roneo the gordan.", "logic": "\nConsume(tiebout, gordan)\nAgonizing(tiebout)\nRebuild(tiebout, fiorenze)\nConsume(gordan, tiebout)\nMarketable(gordan)\nCubistic(aldwin)\nPolemic(fiorenze)\nforall x (Roneo(x, tiebout) -> Roneo(tiebout, gordan))\nforall x (Consume(x, tiebout) -> Polemic(tiebout))\nRoneo(gordan, aldwin) -> Polemic(gordan)\nforall x (Rebuild(x, tiebout) -> Marketable(x))\nRebuild(tiebout, aldwin) and Roneo(tiebout, aldwin) -> Roneo(tiebout, gordan)\nforall x (Roneo(x, tiebout) -> Agonizing(tiebout))\nCubistic(tiebout) -> Roneo(tiebout, gordan)\nforall x (Polemic(x) -> Cubistic(x))\n\nRoneo(gordan, gordan)\n\nRoneo(gordan, gordan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The francoise coast the tom. The francoise is rotational. The francoise ballyrag the coretta. The tom coast the francoise. The tom is lathery. The karol is minimal. The coretta is immaterial. If something alligator the francoise then the francoise alligator the tom. If something coast the francoise then the francoise is immaterial. If the tom alligator the karol then the tom is immaterial. If something ballyrag the francoise then it is lathery. If the francoise ballyrag the karol and the francoise alligator the karol then the francoise alligator the tom. If something alligator the francoise then the francoise is rotational. If the francoise is minimal then the francoise alligator the tom. If something is immaterial then it is minimal. The francoise does not visit the karol.", "logic": "\nCoast(francoise, tom)\nRotational(francoise)\nBallyrag(francoise, coretta)\nCoast(tom, francoise)\nLathery(tom)\nMinimal(karol)\nImmaterial(coretta)\nforall x (Alligator(x, francoise) -> Alligator(francoise, tom))\nforall x (Coast(x, francoise) -> Immaterial(francoise))\nAlligator(tom, karol) -> Immaterial(tom)\nforall x (Ballyrag(x, francoise) -> Lathery(x))\nBallyrag(francoise, karol) and Alligator(francoise, karol) -> Alligator(francoise, tom)\nforall x (Alligator(x, francoise) -> Rotational(francoise))\nMinimal(francoise) -> Alligator(francoise, tom)\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Minimal(x))\n\nnot Ballyrag(francoise, karol)\n\nnot Ballyrag(francoise, karol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The wylie rest the mariann. The wylie is longish. The wylie ballot the walker. The mariann rest the wylie. The mariann is unhappy. The gordan is walleyed. The walker is unreformed. If something cypher the wylie then the wylie cypher the mariann. If something rest the wylie then the wylie is unreformed. If the mariann cypher the gordan then the mariann is unreformed. If something ballot the wylie then it is unhappy. If the wylie ballot the gordan and the wylie cypher the gordan then the wylie cypher the mariann. If something cypher the wylie then the wylie is longish. If the wylie is walleyed then the wylie cypher the mariann. If something is unreformed then it is walleyed. The gordan cypher the walker.", "logic": "\nRest(wylie, mariann)\nLongish(wylie)\nBallot(wylie, walker)\nRest(mariann, wylie)\nUnhappy(mariann)\nWalleyed(gordan)\nUnreformed(walker)\nforall x (Cypher(x, wylie) -> Cypher(wylie, mariann))\nforall x (Rest(x, wylie) -> Unreformed(wylie))\nCypher(mariann, gordan) -> Unreformed(mariann)\nforall x (Ballot(x, wylie) -> Unhappy(x))\nBallot(wylie, gordan) and Cypher(wylie, gordan) -> Cypher(wylie, mariann)\nforall x (Cypher(x, wylie) -> Longish(wylie))\nWalleyed(wylie) -> Cypher(wylie, mariann)\nforall x (Unreformed(x) -> Walleyed(x))\n\nCypher(gordan, walker)\n\nCypher(gordan, walker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1512"} {"premises": "The franklin wham the celeste. The franklin is rivalrous. The franklin is centesimal. The celeste wham the franklin. The celeste invoke the franklin. The oona wham the celeste. The oona wham the von. The oona invoke the von. The von wham the oona. The von invoke the oona. If someone invoke the oona then they are copular. If someone invoke the oona and the oona invoke the celeste then the oona is centesimal. If someone is innoxious then they chase the celeste. If someone wham the oona and they are copular then the oona invoke the franklin. If someone invoke the oona and they are centesimal then they eat the von. If someone is rivalrous then they eat the oona. If someone is copular then they are innoxious. If someone humor the oona then the oona invoke the celeste. The von invoke the oona.", "logic": "\nWham(franklin, celeste)\nRivalrous(franklin)\nCentesimal(franklin)\nWham(celeste, franklin)\nInvoke(celeste, franklin)\nWham(oona, celeste)\nWham(oona, von)\nInvoke(oona, von)\nWham(von, oona)\nInvoke(von, oona)\nforall x (Invoke(x, oona) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Invoke(x, oona) and Invoke(oona, celeste) -> Centesimal(oona))\nforall x (Innoxious(x) -> Humor(x, celeste))\nforall x (Wham(x, oona) and Copular(x) -> Invoke(oona, franklin))\nforall x (Invoke(x, oona) and Centesimal(x) -> Wham(x, von))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Wham(x, oona))\nforall x (Copular(x) -> Innoxious(x))\nforall x (Humor(x, oona) -> Invoke(oona, celeste))\n\nInvoke(von, oona)\n\ntherefore Invoke(von, oona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The hyacinth bogey the klara. The hyacinth is brushed. The hyacinth is hornless. The klara bogey the hyacinth. The klara slat the hyacinth. The lorenza bogey the klara. The lorenza bogey the rubin. The lorenza slat the rubin. The rubin bogey the lorenza. The rubin slat the lorenza. If someone slat the lorenza then they are fatherless. If someone slat the lorenza and the lorenza slat the klara then the lorenza is hornless. If someone is mutilated then they chase the klara. If someone bogey the lorenza and they are fatherless then the lorenza slat the hyacinth. If someone slat the lorenza and they are hornless then they eat the rubin. If someone is brushed then they eat the lorenza. If someone is fatherless then they are mutilated. If someone blunt the lorenza then the lorenza slat the klara. The rubin does not eat the lorenza.", "logic": "\nBogey(hyacinth, klara)\nBrushed(hyacinth)\nHornless(hyacinth)\nBogey(klara, hyacinth)\nSlat(klara, hyacinth)\nBogey(lorenza, klara)\nBogey(lorenza, rubin)\nSlat(lorenza, rubin)\nBogey(rubin, lorenza)\nSlat(rubin, lorenza)\nforall x (Slat(x, lorenza) -> Fatherless(x))\nforall x (Slat(x, lorenza) and Slat(lorenza, klara) -> Hornless(lorenza))\nforall x (Mutilated(x) -> Blunt(x, klara))\nforall x (Bogey(x, lorenza) and Fatherless(x) -> Slat(lorenza, hyacinth))\nforall x (Slat(x, lorenza) and Hornless(x) -> Bogey(x, rubin))\nforall x (Brushed(x) -> Bogey(x, lorenza))\nforall x (Fatherless(x) -> Mutilated(x))\nforall x (Blunt(x, lorenza) -> Slat(lorenza, klara))\n\nnot Bogey(rubin, lorenza)\n\ntherefore Bogey(rubin, lorenza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The trent outshine the zsazsa. The trent is bonelike. The trent is releasing. The zsazsa outshine the trent. The zsazsa argufy the trent. The lorene outshine the zsazsa. The lorene outshine the cari. The lorene argufy the cari. The cari outshine the lorene. The cari argufy the lorene. If someone argufy the lorene then they are jain. If someone argufy the lorene and the lorene argufy the zsazsa then the lorene is releasing. If someone is overland then they chase the zsazsa. If someone outshine the lorene and they are jain then the lorene argufy the trent. If someone argufy the lorene and they are releasing then they eat the cari. If someone is bonelike then they eat the lorene. If someone is jain then they are overland. If someone bike the lorene then the lorene argufy the zsazsa. The trent outshine the lorene.", "logic": "\nOutshine(trent, zsazsa)\nBonelike(trent)\nReleasing(trent)\nOutshine(zsazsa, trent)\nArgufy(zsazsa, trent)\nOutshine(lorene, zsazsa)\nOutshine(lorene, cari)\nArgufy(lorene, cari)\nOutshine(cari, lorene)\nArgufy(cari, lorene)\nforall x (Argufy(x, lorene) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Argufy(x, lorene) and Argufy(lorene, zsazsa) -> Releasing(lorene))\nforall x (Overland(x) -> Bike(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Outshine(x, lorene) and Jain(x) -> Argufy(lorene, trent))\nforall x (Argufy(x, lorene) and Releasing(x) -> Outshine(x, cari))\nforall x (Bonelike(x) -> Outshine(x, lorene))\nforall x (Jain(x) -> Overland(x))\nforall x (Bike(x, lorene) -> Argufy(lorene, zsazsa))\n\nOutshine(trent, lorene)\n\nBonelike(trent) and forall x (Bonelike(x) -> Outshine(x, lorene)) -> therefore Outshine(trent, lorene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The morly plummet the harrold. The morly is attachable. The morly is purplish. The harrold plummet the morly. The harrold emphasise the morly. The kate plummet the harrold. The kate plummet the hanna. The kate emphasise the hanna. The hanna plummet the kate. The hanna emphasise the kate. If someone emphasise the kate then they are rimed. If someone emphasise the kate and the kate emphasise the harrold then the kate is purplish. If someone is enormous then they chase the harrold. If someone plummet the kate and they are rimed then the kate emphasise the morly. If someone emphasise the kate and they are purplish then they eat the hanna. If someone is attachable then they eat the kate. If someone is rimed then they are enormous. If someone char the kate then the kate emphasise the harrold. The hanna is not rimed.", "logic": "\nPlummet(morly, harrold)\nAttachable(morly)\nPurplish(morly)\nPlummet(harrold, morly)\nEmphasise(harrold, morly)\nPlummet(kate, harrold)\nPlummet(kate, hanna)\nEmphasise(kate, hanna)\nPlummet(hanna, kate)\nEmphasise(hanna, kate)\nforall x (Emphasise(x, kate) -> Rimed(x))\nforall x (Emphasise(x, kate) and Emphasise(kate, harrold) -> Purplish(kate))\nforall x (Enormous(x) -> Char(x, harrold))\nforall x (Plummet(x, kate) and Rimed(x) -> Emphasise(kate, morly))\nforall x (Emphasise(x, kate) and Purplish(x) -> Plummet(x, hanna))\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> Plummet(x, kate))\nforall x (Rimed(x) -> Enormous(x))\nforall x (Char(x, kate) -> Emphasise(kate, harrold))\n\nnot Rimed(hanna)\n\nEmphasise(hanna, kate) and forall x (Emphasise(x, kate) -> Rimed(x)) -> therefore Rimed(hanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The kayle unveil the mercie. The kayle is autotelic. The kayle is matronly. The mercie unveil the kayle. The mercie overburden the kayle. The shurlocke unveil the mercie. The shurlocke unveil the frans. The shurlocke overburden the frans. The frans unveil the shurlocke. The frans overburden the shurlocke. If someone overburden the shurlocke then they are lined. If someone overburden the shurlocke and the shurlocke overburden the mercie then the shurlocke is matronly. If someone is prox then they chase the mercie. If someone unveil the shurlocke and they are lined then the shurlocke overburden the kayle. If someone overburden the shurlocke and they are matronly then they eat the frans. If someone is autotelic then they eat the shurlocke. If someone is lined then they are prox. If someone auction the shurlocke then the shurlocke overburden the mercie. The frans is prox.", "logic": "\nUnveil(kayle, mercie)\nAutotelic(kayle)\nMatronly(kayle)\nUnveil(mercie, kayle)\nOverburden(mercie, kayle)\nUnveil(shurlocke, mercie)\nUnveil(shurlocke, frans)\nOverburden(shurlocke, frans)\nUnveil(frans, shurlocke)\nOverburden(frans, shurlocke)\nforall x (Overburden(x, shurlocke) -> Lined(x))\nforall x (Overburden(x, shurlocke) and Overburden(shurlocke, mercie) -> Matronly(shurlocke))\nforall x (Prox(x) -> Auction(x, mercie))\nforall x (Unveil(x, shurlocke) and Lined(x) -> Overburden(shurlocke, kayle))\nforall x (Overburden(x, shurlocke) and Matronly(x) -> Unveil(x, frans))\nforall x (Autotelic(x) -> Unveil(x, shurlocke))\nforall x (Lined(x) -> Prox(x))\nforall x (Auction(x, shurlocke) -> Overburden(shurlocke, mercie))\n\nProx(frans)\n\nOverburden(frans, shurlocke) and forall x (Overburden(x, shurlocke) -> Lined(x)) -> therefore Lined(frans) Lined(frans) and forall x (Lined(x) -> Prox(x)) -> therefore Prox(frans)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The daniel unmask the lavena. The daniel is intoxicant. The daniel is lxiii. The lavena unmask the daniel. The lavena prune the daniel. The gifford unmask the lavena. The gifford unmask the valery. The gifford prune the valery. The valery unmask the gifford. The valery prune the gifford. If someone prune the gifford then they are numb. If someone prune the gifford and the gifford prune the lavena then the gifford is lxiii. If someone is unlabelled then they chase the lavena. If someone unmask the gifford and they are numb then the gifford prune the daniel. If someone prune the gifford and they are lxiii then they eat the valery. If someone is intoxicant then they eat the gifford. If someone is numb then they are unlabelled. If someone deforest the gifford then the gifford prune the lavena. The valery is not unlabelled.", "logic": "\nUnmask(daniel, lavena)\nIntoxicant(daniel)\nLxiii(daniel)\nUnmask(lavena, daniel)\nPrune(lavena, daniel)\nUnmask(gifford, lavena)\nUnmask(gifford, valery)\nPrune(gifford, valery)\nUnmask(valery, gifford)\nPrune(valery, gifford)\nforall x (Prune(x, gifford) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Prune(x, gifford) and Prune(gifford, lavena) -> Lxiii(gifford))\nforall x (Unlabelled(x) -> Deforest(x, lavena))\nforall x (Unmask(x, gifford) and Numb(x) -> Prune(gifford, daniel))\nforall x (Prune(x, gifford) and Lxiii(x) -> Unmask(x, valery))\nforall x (Intoxicant(x) -> Unmask(x, gifford))\nforall x (Numb(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Deforest(x, gifford) -> Prune(gifford, lavena))\n\nnot Unlabelled(valery)\n\nPrune(valery, gifford) and forall x (Prune(x, gifford) -> Numb(x)) -> therefore Numb(valery) Numb(valery) and forall x (Numb(x) -> Unlabelled(x)) -> therefore Unlabelled(valery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The dolley teem the eveline. The dolley is xxxv. The dolley is kampuchean. The eveline teem the dolley. The eveline scram the dolley. The margit teem the eveline. The margit teem the merrel. The margit scram the merrel. The merrel teem the margit. The merrel scram the margit. If someone scram the margit then they are soupy. If someone scram the margit and the margit scram the eveline then the margit is kampuchean. If someone is retrorse then they chase the eveline. If someone teem the margit and they are soupy then the margit scram the dolley. If someone scram the margit and they are kampuchean then they eat the merrel. If someone is xxxv then they eat the margit. If someone is soupy then they are retrorse. If someone churr the margit then the margit scram the eveline. The merrel churr the eveline.", "logic": "\nTeem(dolley, eveline)\nXxxv(dolley)\nKampuchean(dolley)\nTeem(eveline, dolley)\nScram(eveline, dolley)\nTeem(margit, eveline)\nTeem(margit, merrel)\nScram(margit, merrel)\nTeem(merrel, margit)\nScram(merrel, margit)\nforall x (Scram(x, margit) -> Soupy(x))\nforall x (Scram(x, margit) and Scram(margit, eveline) -> Kampuchean(margit))\nforall x (Retrorse(x) -> Churr(x, eveline))\nforall x (Teem(x, margit) and Soupy(x) -> Scram(margit, dolley))\nforall x (Scram(x, margit) and Kampuchean(x) -> Teem(x, merrel))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) -> Teem(x, margit))\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Retrorse(x))\nforall x (Churr(x, margit) -> Scram(margit, eveline))\n\nChurr(merrel, eveline)\n\nScram(merrel, margit) and forall x (Scram(x, margit) -> Soupy(x)) -> therefore Soupy(merrel) Soupy(merrel) and forall x (Soupy(x) -> Retrorse(x)) -> therefore Retrorse(merrel) Retrorse(merrel) and forall x (Retrorse(x) -> Churr(x, eveline)) -> therefore Churr(merrel, eveline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The sherie fertilize the millie. The sherie is fluid. The sherie is saudi. The millie fertilize the sherie. The millie pursue the sherie. The ingaborg fertilize the millie. The ingaborg fertilize the gregg. The ingaborg pursue the gregg. The gregg fertilize the ingaborg. The gregg pursue the ingaborg. If someone pursue the ingaborg then they are glaring. If someone pursue the ingaborg and the ingaborg pursue the millie then the ingaborg is saudi. If someone is garmented then they chase the millie. If someone fertilize the ingaborg and they are glaring then the ingaborg pursue the sherie. If someone pursue the ingaborg and they are saudi then they eat the gregg. If someone is fluid then they eat the ingaborg. If someone is glaring then they are garmented. If someone microwave the ingaborg then the ingaborg pursue the millie. The gregg does not chase the millie.", "logic": "\nFertilize(sherie, millie)\nFluid(sherie)\nSaudi(sherie)\nFertilize(millie, sherie)\nPursue(millie, sherie)\nFertilize(ingaborg, millie)\nFertilize(ingaborg, gregg)\nPursue(ingaborg, gregg)\nFertilize(gregg, ingaborg)\nPursue(gregg, ingaborg)\nforall x (Pursue(x, ingaborg) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Pursue(x, ingaborg) and Pursue(ingaborg, millie) -> Saudi(ingaborg))\nforall x (Garmented(x) -> Microwave(x, millie))\nforall x (Fertilize(x, ingaborg) and Glaring(x) -> Pursue(ingaborg, sherie))\nforall x (Pursue(x, ingaborg) and Saudi(x) -> Fertilize(x, gregg))\nforall x (Fluid(x) -> Fertilize(x, ingaborg))\nforall x (Glaring(x) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Microwave(x, ingaborg) -> Pursue(ingaborg, millie))\n\nnot Microwave(gregg, millie)\n\nPursue(gregg, ingaborg) and forall x (Pursue(x, ingaborg) -> Glaring(x)) -> therefore Glaring(gregg) Glaring(gregg) and forall x (Glaring(x) -> Garmented(x)) -> therefore Garmented(gregg) Garmented(gregg) and forall x (Garmented(x) -> Microwave(x, millie)) -> therefore Microwave(gregg, millie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The esteban color the aidan. The esteban is chaldee. The esteban is allegro. The aidan color the esteban. The aidan depilate the esteban. The savina color the aidan. The savina color the tabina. The savina depilate the tabina. The tabina color the savina. The tabina depilate the savina. If someone depilate the savina then they are alimental. If someone depilate the savina and the savina depilate the aidan then the savina is allegro. If someone is factitious then they chase the aidan. If someone color the savina and they are alimental then the savina depilate the esteban. If someone depilate the savina and they are allegro then they eat the tabina. If someone is chaldee then they eat the savina. If someone is alimental then they are factitious. If someone nitpick the savina then the savina depilate the aidan. The aidan does not chase the aidan.", "logic": "\nColor(esteban, aidan)\nChaldee(esteban)\nAllegro(esteban)\nColor(aidan, esteban)\nDepilate(aidan, esteban)\nColor(savina, aidan)\nColor(savina, tabina)\nDepilate(savina, tabina)\nColor(tabina, savina)\nDepilate(tabina, savina)\nforall x (Depilate(x, savina) -> Alimental(x))\nforall x (Depilate(x, savina) and Depilate(savina, aidan) -> Allegro(savina))\nforall x (Factitious(x) -> Nitpick(x, aidan))\nforall x (Color(x, savina) and Alimental(x) -> Depilate(savina, esteban))\nforall x (Depilate(x, savina) and Allegro(x) -> Color(x, tabina))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Color(x, savina))\nforall x (Alimental(x) -> Factitious(x))\nforall x (Nitpick(x, savina) -> Depilate(savina, aidan))\n\nnot Nitpick(aidan, aidan)\n\nforall x (Factitious(x) -> Nitpick(x, aidan)) <- forall x (Alimental(x) -> Factitious(x)) <- forall x (Depilate(x, savina) -> Alimental(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The maura father the carlotta. The maura is lactic. The maura is exclusive. The carlotta father the maura. The carlotta trap the maura. The dix father the carlotta. The dix father the patrik. The dix trap the patrik. The patrik father the dix. The patrik trap the dix. If someone trap the dix then they are neapolitan. If someone trap the dix and the dix trap the carlotta then the dix is exclusive. If someone is clawed then they chase the carlotta. If someone father the dix and they are neapolitan then the dix trap the maura. If someone trap the dix and they are exclusive then they eat the patrik. If someone is lactic then they eat the dix. If someone is neapolitan then they are clawed. If someone decompose the dix then the dix trap the carlotta. The maura decompose the carlotta.", "logic": "\nFather(maura, carlotta)\nLactic(maura)\nExclusive(maura)\nFather(carlotta, maura)\nTrap(carlotta, maura)\nFather(dix, carlotta)\nFather(dix, patrik)\nTrap(dix, patrik)\nFather(patrik, dix)\nTrap(patrik, dix)\nforall x (Trap(x, dix) -> Neapolitan(x))\nforall x (Trap(x, dix) and Trap(dix, carlotta) -> Exclusive(dix))\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Decompose(x, carlotta))\nforall x (Father(x, dix) and Neapolitan(x) -> Trap(dix, maura))\nforall x (Trap(x, dix) and Exclusive(x) -> Father(x, patrik))\nforall x (Lactic(x) -> Father(x, dix))\nforall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Clawed(x))\nforall x (Decompose(x, dix) -> Trap(dix, carlotta))\n\nDecompose(maura, carlotta)\n\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Decompose(x, carlotta)) <- forall x (Neapolitan(x) -> Clawed(x)) <- forall x (Trap(x, dix) -> Neapolitan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The janos persecute the darda. The janos is elating. The janos is very. The darda persecute the janos. The darda cocoon the janos. The danyette persecute the darda. The danyette persecute the therine. The danyette cocoon the therine. The therine persecute the danyette. The therine cocoon the danyette. If someone cocoon the danyette then they are separatist. If someone cocoon the danyette and the danyette cocoon the darda then the danyette is very. If someone is euphonic then they chase the darda. If someone persecute the danyette and they are separatist then the danyette cocoon the janos. If someone cocoon the danyette and they are very then they eat the therine. If someone is elating then they eat the danyette. If someone is separatist then they are euphonic. If someone titrate the danyette then the danyette cocoon the darda. The therine does not eat the therine.", "logic": "\nPersecute(janos, darda)\nElating(janos)\nVery(janos)\nPersecute(darda, janos)\nCocoon(darda, janos)\nPersecute(danyette, darda)\nPersecute(danyette, therine)\nCocoon(danyette, therine)\nPersecute(therine, danyette)\nCocoon(therine, danyette)\nforall x (Cocoon(x, danyette) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, danyette) and Cocoon(danyette, darda) -> Very(danyette))\nforall x (Euphonic(x) -> Titrate(x, darda))\nforall x (Persecute(x, danyette) and Separatist(x) -> Cocoon(danyette, janos))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, danyette) and Very(x) -> Persecute(x, therine))\nforall x (Elating(x) -> Persecute(x, danyette))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Euphonic(x))\nforall x (Titrate(x, danyette) -> Cocoon(danyette, darda))\n\nnot Persecute(therine, therine)\n\nforall x (Cocoon(x, danyette) and Very(x) -> Persecute(x, therine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The beatrisa league the morse. The beatrisa is serial. The beatrisa is unneeded. The morse league the beatrisa. The morse immobilize the beatrisa. The lonnie league the morse. The lonnie league the erny. The lonnie immobilize the erny. The erny league the lonnie. The erny immobilize the lonnie. If someone immobilize the lonnie then they are wrecked. If someone immobilize the lonnie and the lonnie immobilize the morse then the lonnie is unneeded. If someone is amyloid then they chase the morse. If someone league the lonnie and they are wrecked then the lonnie immobilize the beatrisa. If someone immobilize the lonnie and they are unneeded then they eat the erny. If someone is serial then they eat the lonnie. If someone is wrecked then they are amyloid. If someone stutter the lonnie then the lonnie immobilize the morse. The morse league the lonnie.", "logic": "\nLeague(beatrisa, morse)\nSerial(beatrisa)\nUnneeded(beatrisa)\nLeague(morse, beatrisa)\nImmobilize(morse, beatrisa)\nLeague(lonnie, morse)\nLeague(lonnie, erny)\nImmobilize(lonnie, erny)\nLeague(erny, lonnie)\nImmobilize(erny, lonnie)\nforall x (Immobilize(x, lonnie) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Immobilize(x, lonnie) and Immobilize(lonnie, morse) -> Unneeded(lonnie))\nforall x (Amyloid(x) -> Stutter(x, morse))\nforall x (League(x, lonnie) and Wrecked(x) -> Immobilize(lonnie, beatrisa))\nforall x (Immobilize(x, lonnie) and Unneeded(x) -> League(x, erny))\nforall x (Serial(x) -> League(x, lonnie))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Stutter(x, lonnie) -> Immobilize(lonnie, morse))\n\nLeague(morse, lonnie)\n\nforall x (Serial(x) -> League(x, lonnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The rita flatten the prissie. The rita is apodeictic. The rita is unseeded. The prissie flatten the rita. The prissie bream the rita. The kevina flatten the prissie. The kevina flatten the shilpa. The kevina bream the shilpa. The shilpa flatten the kevina. The shilpa bream the kevina. If someone bream the kevina then they are steerable. If someone bream the kevina and the kevina bream the prissie then the kevina is unseeded. If someone is known then they chase the prissie. If someone flatten the kevina and they are steerable then the kevina bream the rita. If someone bream the kevina and they are unseeded then they eat the shilpa. If someone is apodeictic then they eat the kevina. If someone is steerable then they are known. If someone excogitate the kevina then the kevina bream the prissie. The kevina is not apodeictic.", "logic": "\nFlatten(rita, prissie)\nApodeictic(rita)\nUnseeded(rita)\nFlatten(prissie, rita)\nBream(prissie, rita)\nFlatten(kevina, prissie)\nFlatten(kevina, shilpa)\nBream(kevina, shilpa)\nFlatten(shilpa, kevina)\nBream(shilpa, kevina)\nforall x (Bream(x, kevina) -> Steerable(x))\nforall x (Bream(x, kevina) and Bream(kevina, prissie) -> Unseeded(kevina))\nforall x (Known(x) -> Excogitate(x, prissie))\nforall x (Flatten(x, kevina) and Steerable(x) -> Bream(kevina, rita))\nforall x (Bream(x, kevina) and Unseeded(x) -> Flatten(x, shilpa))\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Flatten(x, kevina))\nforall x (Steerable(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, kevina) -> Bream(kevina, prissie))\n\nnot Apodeictic(kevina)\n\nnot Apodeictic(kevina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The caty parade the shelton. The caty is downtown. The caty is unheaded. The shelton parade the caty. The shelton carbonate the caty. The cassandre parade the shelton. The cassandre parade the doria. The cassandre carbonate the doria. The doria parade the cassandre. The doria carbonate the cassandre. If someone carbonate the cassandre then they are made. If someone carbonate the cassandre and the cassandre carbonate the shelton then the cassandre is unheaded. If someone is magenta then they chase the shelton. If someone parade the cassandre and they are made then the cassandre carbonate the caty. If someone carbonate the cassandre and they are unheaded then they eat the doria. If someone is downtown then they eat the cassandre. If someone is made then they are magenta. If someone blink the cassandre then the cassandre carbonate the shelton. The shelton blink the doria.", "logic": "\nParade(caty, shelton)\nDowntown(caty)\nUnheaded(caty)\nParade(shelton, caty)\nCarbonate(shelton, caty)\nParade(cassandre, shelton)\nParade(cassandre, doria)\nCarbonate(cassandre, doria)\nParade(doria, cassandre)\nCarbonate(doria, cassandre)\nforall x (Carbonate(x, cassandre) -> Made(x))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, cassandre) and Carbonate(cassandre, shelton) -> Unheaded(cassandre))\nforall x (Magenta(x) -> Blink(x, shelton))\nforall x (Parade(x, cassandre) and Made(x) -> Carbonate(cassandre, caty))\nforall x (Carbonate(x, cassandre) and Unheaded(x) -> Parade(x, doria))\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Parade(x, cassandre))\nforall x (Made(x) -> Magenta(x))\nforall x (Blink(x, cassandre) -> Carbonate(cassandre, shelton))\n\nBlink(shelton, doria)\n\nBlink(shelton, doria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The fleming snowball the georgetta. The fleming is hemal. The fleming is zero. The georgetta snowball the fleming. The georgetta wander the fleming. The marlo snowball the georgetta. The marlo snowball the erhard. The marlo wander the erhard. The erhard snowball the marlo. The erhard wander the marlo. If someone wander the marlo then they are tractive. If someone wander the marlo and the marlo wander the georgetta then the marlo is zero. If someone is dilute then they chase the georgetta. If someone snowball the marlo and they are tractive then the marlo wander the fleming. If someone wander the marlo and they are zero then they eat the erhard. If someone is hemal then they eat the marlo. If someone is tractive then they are dilute. If someone moor the marlo then the marlo wander the georgetta. The fleming does not visit the marlo.", "logic": "\nSnowball(fleming, georgetta)\nHemal(fleming)\nZero(fleming)\nSnowball(georgetta, fleming)\nWander(georgetta, fleming)\nSnowball(marlo, georgetta)\nSnowball(marlo, erhard)\nWander(marlo, erhard)\nSnowball(erhard, marlo)\nWander(erhard, marlo)\nforall x (Wander(x, marlo) -> Tractive(x))\nforall x (Wander(x, marlo) and Wander(marlo, georgetta) -> Zero(marlo))\nforall x (Dilute(x) -> Moor(x, georgetta))\nforall x (Snowball(x, marlo) and Tractive(x) -> Wander(marlo, fleming))\nforall x (Wander(x, marlo) and Zero(x) -> Snowball(x, erhard))\nforall x (Hemal(x) -> Snowball(x, marlo))\nforall x (Tractive(x) -> Dilute(x))\nforall x (Moor(x, marlo) -> Wander(marlo, georgetta))\n\nnot Wander(fleming, marlo)\n\nnot Wander(fleming, marlo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The adara order the jennette. The adara is shoddy. The adara is thematic. The jennette order the adara. The jennette dower the adara. The griff order the jennette. The griff order the marita. The griff dower the marita. The marita order the griff. The marita dower the griff. If someone dower the griff then they are fulgurant. If someone dower the griff and the griff dower the jennette then the griff is thematic. If someone is petty then they chase the jennette. If someone order the griff and they are fulgurant then the griff dower the adara. If someone dower the griff and they are thematic then they eat the marita. If someone is shoddy then they eat the griff. If someone is fulgurant then they are petty. If someone lacquer the griff then the griff dower the jennette. The marita is young.", "logic": "\nOrder(adara, jennette)\nShoddy(adara)\nThematic(adara)\nOrder(jennette, adara)\nDower(jennette, adara)\nOrder(griff, jennette)\nOrder(griff, marita)\nDower(griff, marita)\nOrder(marita, griff)\nDower(marita, griff)\nforall x (Dower(x, griff) -> Fulgurant(x))\nforall x (Dower(x, griff) and Dower(griff, jennette) -> Thematic(griff))\nforall x (Petty(x) -> Lacquer(x, jennette))\nforall x (Order(x, griff) and Fulgurant(x) -> Dower(griff, adara))\nforall x (Dower(x, griff) and Thematic(x) -> Order(x, marita))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> Order(x, griff))\nforall x (Fulgurant(x) -> Petty(x))\nforall x (Lacquer(x, griff) -> Dower(griff, jennette))\n\nYoung(marita)\n\nYoung(marita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1269"} {"premises": "The johann is crowing. The johann is not definable. The johann currycomb the rad. The johann currycomb the jud. The johann does not need the mabelle. The johann subsist the jud. The mabelle is auspicious. The mabelle is effortless. The mabelle is definable. The mabelle lyophilise the jud. The rad is crowing. The rad is definable. The jud is definable. The jud currycomb the johann. The jud currycomb the rad. The jud does not see the johann. If something is untucked and effortless then it lyophilise the mabelle. If something lyophilise the rad and the rad is definable then the rad currycomb the johann. If something is crowing and it currycomb the johann then the johann subsist the mabelle. If something lyophilise the jud and it is definable then it subsist the rad. If something lyophilise the mabelle and the mabelle is definable then it subsist the mabelle. If something subsist the rad and it is definable then it is untucked. If the rad is untucked and the rad is effortless then the rad does not see the johann. If the mabelle does not need the rad then the rad subsist the johann. The jud does not see the johann.", "logic": "\nCrowing(johann)\nnot Definable(johann)\nCurrycomb(johann, rad)\nCurrycomb(johann, jud)\nnot Subsist(johann, mabelle)\nSubsist(johann, jud)\nAuspicious(mabelle)\nEffortless(mabelle)\nDefinable(mabelle)\nLyophilise(mabelle, jud)\nCrowing(rad)\nDefinable(rad)\nDefinable(jud)\nCurrycomb(jud, johann)\nCurrycomb(jud, rad)\nnot Lyophilise(jud, johann)\nforall x (Untucked(x) and Effortless(x) -> Lyophilise(x, mabelle))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, rad) and Definable(rad) -> Currycomb(rad, johann))\nforall x (Crowing(x) and Currycomb(x, johann) -> Subsist(johann, mabelle))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, jud) and Definable(x) -> Subsist(x, rad))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, mabelle) and Definable(mabelle) -> Subsist(x, mabelle))\nforall x (Subsist(x, rad) and Definable(x) -> Untucked(x))\nUntucked(rad) and Effortless(rad) -> not Lyophilise(rad, johann)\nnot Subsist(mabelle, rad) -> Subsist(rad, johann)\n\nnot Lyophilise(jud, johann)\n\ntherefore not Lyophilise(jud, johann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The ginnie is deplorable. The ginnie is not soaring. The ginnie nuzzle the stella. The ginnie nuzzle the meridith. The ginnie does not need the johanna. The ginnie yellow the meridith. The johanna is congruous. The johanna is collegial. The johanna is soaring. The johanna resurge the meridith. The stella is deplorable. The stella is soaring. The meridith is soaring. The meridith nuzzle the ginnie. The meridith nuzzle the stella. The meridith does not see the ginnie. If something is chilly and collegial then it resurge the johanna. If something resurge the stella and the stella is soaring then the stella nuzzle the ginnie. If something is deplorable and it nuzzle the ginnie then the ginnie yellow the johanna. If something resurge the meridith and it is soaring then it yellow the stella. If something resurge the johanna and the johanna is soaring then it yellow the johanna. If something yellow the stella and it is soaring then it is chilly. If the stella is chilly and the stella is collegial then the stella does not see the ginnie. If the johanna does not need the stella then the stella yellow the ginnie. The johanna is not collegial.", "logic": "\nDeplorable(ginnie)\nnot Soaring(ginnie)\nNuzzle(ginnie, stella)\nNuzzle(ginnie, meridith)\nnot Yellow(ginnie, johanna)\nYellow(ginnie, meridith)\nCongruous(johanna)\nCollegial(johanna)\nSoaring(johanna)\nResurge(johanna, meridith)\nDeplorable(stella)\nSoaring(stella)\nSoaring(meridith)\nNuzzle(meridith, ginnie)\nNuzzle(meridith, stella)\nnot Resurge(meridith, ginnie)\nforall x (Chilly(x) and Collegial(x) -> Resurge(x, johanna))\nforall x (Resurge(x, stella) and Soaring(stella) -> Nuzzle(stella, ginnie))\nforall x (Deplorable(x) and Nuzzle(x, ginnie) -> Yellow(ginnie, johanna))\nforall x (Resurge(x, meridith) and Soaring(x) -> Yellow(x, stella))\nforall x (Resurge(x, johanna) and Soaring(johanna) -> Yellow(x, johanna))\nforall x (Yellow(x, stella) and Soaring(x) -> Chilly(x))\nChilly(stella) and Collegial(stella) -> not Resurge(stella, ginnie)\nnot Yellow(johanna, stella) -> Yellow(stella, ginnie)\n\nnot Collegial(johanna)\n\ntherefore Collegial(johanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The hermine is obsolete. The hermine is not scrambled. The hermine monopolise the allah. The hermine monopolise the honoria. The hermine does not need the jerrie. The hermine crop the honoria. The jerrie is coccygeal. The jerrie is latvian. The jerrie is scrambled. The jerrie signal the honoria. The allah is obsolete. The allah is scrambled. The honoria is scrambled. The honoria monopolise the hermine. The honoria monopolise the allah. The honoria does not see the hermine. If something is freshman and latvian then it signal the jerrie. If something signal the allah and the allah is scrambled then the allah monopolise the hermine. If something is obsolete and it monopolise the hermine then the hermine crop the jerrie. If something signal the honoria and it is scrambled then it crop the allah. If something signal the jerrie and the jerrie is scrambled then it crop the jerrie. If something crop the allah and it is scrambled then it is freshman. If the allah is freshman and the allah is latvian then the allah does not see the hermine. If the jerrie does not need the allah then the allah crop the hermine. The jerrie crop the allah.", "logic": "\nObsolete(hermine)\nnot Scrambled(hermine)\nMonopolise(hermine, allah)\nMonopolise(hermine, honoria)\nnot Crop(hermine, jerrie)\nCrop(hermine, honoria)\nCoccygeal(jerrie)\nLatvian(jerrie)\nScrambled(jerrie)\nSignal(jerrie, honoria)\nObsolete(allah)\nScrambled(allah)\nScrambled(honoria)\nMonopolise(honoria, hermine)\nMonopolise(honoria, allah)\nnot Signal(honoria, hermine)\nforall x (Freshman(x) and Latvian(x) -> Signal(x, jerrie))\nforall x (Signal(x, allah) and Scrambled(allah) -> Monopolise(allah, hermine))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) and Monopolise(x, hermine) -> Crop(hermine, jerrie))\nforall x (Signal(x, honoria) and Scrambled(x) -> Crop(x, allah))\nforall x (Signal(x, jerrie) and Scrambled(jerrie) -> Crop(x, jerrie))\nforall x (Crop(x, allah) and Scrambled(x) -> Freshman(x))\nFreshman(allah) and Latvian(allah) -> not Signal(allah, hermine)\nnot Crop(jerrie, allah) -> Crop(allah, hermine)\n\nCrop(jerrie, allah)\n\nSignal(jerrie, honoria) and Scrambled(jerrie) and forall x (Signal(x, honoria) and Scrambled(x) -> Crop(x, allah)) -> therefore Crop(jerrie, allah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The dustin is solomonic. The dustin is not allopatric. The dustin devil the barbie. The dustin devil the karim. The dustin does not need the lenka. The dustin quest the karim. The lenka is accented. The lenka is chary. The lenka is allopatric. The lenka dilute the karim. The barbie is solomonic. The barbie is allopatric. The karim is allopatric. The karim devil the dustin. The karim devil the barbie. The karim does not see the dustin. If something is defamatory and chary then it dilute the lenka. If something dilute the barbie and the barbie is allopatric then the barbie devil the dustin. If something is solomonic and it devil the dustin then the dustin quest the lenka. If something dilute the karim and it is allopatric then it quest the barbie. If something dilute the lenka and the lenka is allopatric then it quest the lenka. If something quest the barbie and it is allopatric then it is defamatory. If the barbie is defamatory and the barbie is chary then the barbie does not see the dustin. If the lenka does not need the barbie then the barbie quest the dustin. The lenka does not need the barbie.", "logic": "\nSolomonic(dustin)\nnot Allopatric(dustin)\nDevil(dustin, barbie)\nDevil(dustin, karim)\nnot Quest(dustin, lenka)\nQuest(dustin, karim)\nAccented(lenka)\nChary(lenka)\nAllopatric(lenka)\nDilute(lenka, karim)\nSolomonic(barbie)\nAllopatric(barbie)\nAllopatric(karim)\nDevil(karim, dustin)\nDevil(karim, barbie)\nnot Dilute(karim, dustin)\nforall x (Defamatory(x) and Chary(x) -> Dilute(x, lenka))\nforall x (Dilute(x, barbie) and Allopatric(barbie) -> Devil(barbie, dustin))\nforall x (Solomonic(x) and Devil(x, dustin) -> Quest(dustin, lenka))\nforall x (Dilute(x, karim) and Allopatric(x) -> Quest(x, barbie))\nforall x (Dilute(x, lenka) and Allopatric(lenka) -> Quest(x, lenka))\nforall x (Quest(x, barbie) and Allopatric(x) -> Defamatory(x))\nDefamatory(barbie) and Chary(barbie) -> not Dilute(barbie, dustin)\nnot Quest(lenka, barbie) -> Quest(barbie, dustin)\n\nnot Quest(lenka, barbie)\n\nDilute(lenka, karim) and Allopatric(lenka) and forall x (Dilute(x, karim) and Allopatric(x) -> Quest(x, barbie)) -> therefore Quest(lenka, barbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The rinaldo is doubting. The rinaldo is not pyloric. The rinaldo corrade the pietro. The rinaldo corrade the donovan. The rinaldo does not need the xenia. The rinaldo bromate the donovan. The xenia is dantean. The xenia is floodlit. The xenia is pyloric. The xenia tyrannise the donovan. The pietro is doubting. The pietro is pyloric. The donovan is pyloric. The donovan corrade the rinaldo. The donovan corrade the pietro. The donovan does not see the rinaldo. If something is reductive and floodlit then it tyrannise the xenia. If something tyrannise the pietro and the pietro is pyloric then the pietro corrade the rinaldo. If something is doubting and it corrade the rinaldo then the rinaldo bromate the xenia. If something tyrannise the donovan and it is pyloric then it bromate the pietro. If something tyrannise the xenia and the xenia is pyloric then it bromate the xenia. If something bromate the pietro and it is pyloric then it is reductive. If the pietro is reductive and the pietro is floodlit then the pietro does not see the rinaldo. If the xenia does not need the pietro then the pietro bromate the rinaldo. The xenia is reductive.", "logic": "\nDoubting(rinaldo)\nnot Pyloric(rinaldo)\nCorrade(rinaldo, pietro)\nCorrade(rinaldo, donovan)\nnot Bromate(rinaldo, xenia)\nBromate(rinaldo, donovan)\nDantean(xenia)\nFloodlit(xenia)\nPyloric(xenia)\nTyrannise(xenia, donovan)\nDoubting(pietro)\nPyloric(pietro)\nPyloric(donovan)\nCorrade(donovan, rinaldo)\nCorrade(donovan, pietro)\nnot Tyrannise(donovan, rinaldo)\nforall x (Reductive(x) and Floodlit(x) -> Tyrannise(x, xenia))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, pietro) and Pyloric(pietro) -> Corrade(pietro, rinaldo))\nforall x (Doubting(x) and Corrade(x, rinaldo) -> Bromate(rinaldo, xenia))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, donovan) and Pyloric(x) -> Bromate(x, pietro))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, xenia) and Pyloric(xenia) -> Bromate(x, xenia))\nforall x (Bromate(x, pietro) and Pyloric(x) -> Reductive(x))\nReductive(pietro) and Floodlit(pietro) -> not Tyrannise(pietro, rinaldo)\nnot Bromate(xenia, pietro) -> Bromate(pietro, rinaldo)\n\nReductive(xenia)\n\nTyrannise(xenia, donovan) and Pyloric(xenia) and forall x (Tyrannise(x, donovan) and Pyloric(x) -> Bromate(x, pietro)) -> therefore Bromate(xenia, pietro) Bromate(xenia, pietro) and Pyloric(xenia) and forall x (Bromate(x, pietro) and Pyloric(x) -> Reductive(x)) -> therefore Reductive(xenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The grier is misbranded. The grier is not bovid. The grier contain the trey. The grier contain the jerome. The grier does not need the jeramie. The grier diss the jerome. The jeramie is magnified. The jeramie is totemic. The jeramie is bovid. The jeramie unlock the jerome. The trey is misbranded. The trey is bovid. The jerome is bovid. The jerome contain the grier. The jerome contain the trey. The jerome does not see the grier. If something is abashed and totemic then it unlock the jeramie. If something unlock the trey and the trey is bovid then the trey contain the grier. If something is misbranded and it contain the grier then the grier diss the jeramie. If something unlock the jerome and it is bovid then it diss the trey. If something unlock the jeramie and the jeramie is bovid then it diss the jeramie. If something diss the trey and it is bovid then it is abashed. If the trey is abashed and the trey is totemic then the trey does not see the grier. If the jeramie does not need the trey then the trey diss the grier. The jeramie is not abashed.", "logic": "\nMisbranded(grier)\nnot Bovid(grier)\nContain(grier, trey)\nContain(grier, jerome)\nnot Diss(grier, jeramie)\nDiss(grier, jerome)\nMagnified(jeramie)\nTotemic(jeramie)\nBovid(jeramie)\nUnlock(jeramie, jerome)\nMisbranded(trey)\nBovid(trey)\nBovid(jerome)\nContain(jerome, grier)\nContain(jerome, trey)\nnot Unlock(jerome, grier)\nforall x (Abashed(x) and Totemic(x) -> Unlock(x, jeramie))\nforall x (Unlock(x, trey) and Bovid(trey) -> Contain(trey, grier))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) and Contain(x, grier) -> Diss(grier, jeramie))\nforall x (Unlock(x, jerome) and Bovid(x) -> Diss(x, trey))\nforall x (Unlock(x, jeramie) and Bovid(jeramie) -> Diss(x, jeramie))\nforall x (Diss(x, trey) and Bovid(x) -> Abashed(x))\nAbashed(trey) and Totemic(trey) -> not Unlock(trey, grier)\nnot Diss(jeramie, trey) -> Diss(trey, grier)\n\nnot Abashed(jeramie)\n\nUnlock(jeramie, jerome) and Bovid(jeramie) and forall x (Unlock(x, jerome) and Bovid(x) -> Diss(x, trey)) -> therefore Diss(jeramie, trey) Diss(jeramie, trey) and Bovid(jeramie) and forall x (Diss(x, trey) and Bovid(x) -> Abashed(x)) -> therefore Abashed(jeramie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The josef is rectified. The josef is not analogue. The josef disregard the hyatt. The josef disregard the ginny. The josef does not need the gaven. The josef louden the ginny. The gaven is later. The gaven is veritable. The gaven is analogue. The gaven satirize the ginny. The hyatt is rectified. The hyatt is analogue. The ginny is analogue. The ginny disregard the josef. The ginny disregard the hyatt. The ginny does not see the josef. If something is lithic and veritable then it satirize the gaven. If something satirize the hyatt and the hyatt is analogue then the hyatt disregard the josef. If something is rectified and it disregard the josef then the josef louden the gaven. If something satirize the ginny and it is analogue then it louden the hyatt. If something satirize the gaven and the gaven is analogue then it louden the gaven. If something louden the hyatt and it is analogue then it is lithic. If the hyatt is lithic and the hyatt is veritable then the hyatt does not see the josef. If the gaven does not need the hyatt then the hyatt louden the josef. The gaven satirize the gaven.", "logic": "\nRectified(josef)\nnot Analogue(josef)\nDisregard(josef, hyatt)\nDisregard(josef, ginny)\nnot Louden(josef, gaven)\nLouden(josef, ginny)\nLater(gaven)\nVeritable(gaven)\nAnalogue(gaven)\nSatirize(gaven, ginny)\nRectified(hyatt)\nAnalogue(hyatt)\nAnalogue(ginny)\nDisregard(ginny, josef)\nDisregard(ginny, hyatt)\nnot Satirize(ginny, josef)\nforall x (Lithic(x) and Veritable(x) -> Satirize(x, gaven))\nforall x (Satirize(x, hyatt) and Analogue(hyatt) -> Disregard(hyatt, josef))\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Disregard(x, josef) -> Louden(josef, gaven))\nforall x (Satirize(x, ginny) and Analogue(x) -> Louden(x, hyatt))\nforall x (Satirize(x, gaven) and Analogue(gaven) -> Louden(x, gaven))\nforall x (Louden(x, hyatt) and Analogue(x) -> Lithic(x))\nLithic(hyatt) and Veritable(hyatt) -> not Satirize(hyatt, josef)\nnot Louden(gaven, hyatt) -> Louden(hyatt, josef)\n\nSatirize(gaven, gaven)\n\nSatirize(gaven, ginny) and Analogue(gaven) and forall x (Satirize(x, ginny) and Analogue(x) -> Louden(x, hyatt)) -> therefore Louden(gaven, hyatt) Louden(gaven, hyatt) and Analogue(gaven) and forall x (Louden(x, hyatt) and Analogue(x) -> Lithic(x)) -> therefore Lithic(gaven) Lithic(gaven) and Veritable(gaven) and forall x (Lithic(x) and Veritable(x) -> Satirize(x, gaven)) -> therefore Satirize(gaven, gaven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The raphael is quebecois. The raphael is not fertile. The raphael isomerise the grady. The raphael isomerise the josy. The raphael does not need the jaquelin. The raphael chase the josy. The jaquelin is ilxx. The jaquelin is earthborn. The jaquelin is fertile. The jaquelin pounce the josy. The grady is quebecois. The grady is fertile. The josy is fertile. The josy isomerise the raphael. The josy isomerise the grady. The josy does not see the raphael. If something is prize and earthborn then it pounce the jaquelin. If something pounce the grady and the grady is fertile then the grady isomerise the raphael. If something is quebecois and it isomerise the raphael then the raphael chase the jaquelin. If something pounce the josy and it is fertile then it chase the grady. If something pounce the jaquelin and the jaquelin is fertile then it chase the jaquelin. If something chase the grady and it is fertile then it is prize. If the grady is prize and the grady is earthborn then the grady does not see the raphael. If the jaquelin does not need the grady then the grady chase the raphael. The jaquelin does not see the jaquelin.", "logic": "\nQuebecois(raphael)\nnot Fertile(raphael)\nIsomerise(raphael, grady)\nIsomerise(raphael, josy)\nnot Chase(raphael, jaquelin)\nChase(raphael, josy)\nIlxx(jaquelin)\nEarthborn(jaquelin)\nFertile(jaquelin)\nPounce(jaquelin, josy)\nQuebecois(grady)\nFertile(grady)\nFertile(josy)\nIsomerise(josy, raphael)\nIsomerise(josy, grady)\nnot Pounce(josy, raphael)\nforall x (Prize(x) and Earthborn(x) -> Pounce(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Pounce(x, grady) and Fertile(grady) -> Isomerise(grady, raphael))\nforall x (Quebecois(x) and Isomerise(x, raphael) -> Chase(raphael, jaquelin))\nforall x (Pounce(x, josy) and Fertile(x) -> Chase(x, grady))\nforall x (Pounce(x, jaquelin) and Fertile(jaquelin) -> Chase(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Chase(x, grady) and Fertile(x) -> Prize(x))\nPrize(grady) and Earthborn(grady) -> not Pounce(grady, raphael)\nnot Chase(jaquelin, grady) -> Chase(grady, raphael)\n\nnot Pounce(jaquelin, jaquelin)\n\nPounce(jaquelin, josy) and Fertile(jaquelin) and forall x (Pounce(x, josy) and Fertile(x) -> Chase(x, grady)) -> therefore Chase(jaquelin, grady) Chase(jaquelin, grady) and Fertile(jaquelin) and forall x (Chase(x, grady) and Fertile(x) -> Prize(x)) -> therefore Prize(jaquelin) Prize(jaquelin) and Earthborn(jaquelin) and forall x (Prize(x) and Earthborn(x) -> Pounce(x, jaquelin)) -> therefore Pounce(jaquelin, jaquelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The wright is worshipful. The wright is not plumelike. The wright factor the dani. The wright factor the celia. The wright does not need the clarey. The wright snafu the celia. The clarey is butyric. The clarey is scarce. The clarey is plumelike. The clarey secularise the celia. The dani is worshipful. The dani is plumelike. The celia is plumelike. The celia factor the wright. The celia factor the dani. The celia does not see the wright. If something is expurgated and scarce then it secularise the clarey. If something secularise the dani and the dani is plumelike then the dani factor the wright. If something is worshipful and it factor the wright then the wright snafu the clarey. If something secularise the celia and it is plumelike then it snafu the dani. If something secularise the clarey and the clarey is plumelike then it snafu the clarey. If something snafu the dani and it is plumelike then it is expurgated. If the dani is expurgated and the dani is scarce then the dani does not see the wright. If the clarey does not need the dani then the dani snafu the wright. The dani does not see the clarey.", "logic": "\nWorshipful(wright)\nnot Plumelike(wright)\nFactor(wright, dani)\nFactor(wright, celia)\nnot Snafu(wright, clarey)\nSnafu(wright, celia)\nButyric(clarey)\nScarce(clarey)\nPlumelike(clarey)\nSecularise(clarey, celia)\nWorshipful(dani)\nPlumelike(dani)\nPlumelike(celia)\nFactor(celia, wright)\nFactor(celia, dani)\nnot Secularise(celia, wright)\nforall x (Expurgated(x) and Scarce(x) -> Secularise(x, clarey))\nforall x (Secularise(x, dani) and Plumelike(dani) -> Factor(dani, wright))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) and Factor(x, wright) -> Snafu(wright, clarey))\nforall x (Secularise(x, celia) and Plumelike(x) -> Snafu(x, dani))\nforall x (Secularise(x, clarey) and Plumelike(clarey) -> Snafu(x, clarey))\nforall x (Snafu(x, dani) and Plumelike(x) -> Expurgated(x))\nExpurgated(dani) and Scarce(dani) -> not Secularise(dani, wright)\nnot Snafu(clarey, dani) -> Snafu(dani, wright)\n\nnot Secularise(dani, clarey)\n\nforall x (Expurgated(x) and Scarce(x) -> Secularise(x, clarey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The jermain is shamanist. The jermain is not vehement. The jermain refit the kiersten. The jermain refit the janaya. The jermain does not need the rahul. The jermain leaf the janaya. The rahul is classless. The rahul is malay. The rahul is vehement. The rahul uncross the janaya. The kiersten is shamanist. The kiersten is vehement. The janaya is vehement. The janaya refit the jermain. The janaya refit the kiersten. The janaya does not see the jermain. If something is deductible and malay then it uncross the rahul. If something uncross the kiersten and the kiersten is vehement then the kiersten refit the jermain. If something is shamanist and it refit the jermain then the jermain leaf the rahul. If something uncross the janaya and it is vehement then it leaf the kiersten. If something uncross the rahul and the rahul is vehement then it leaf the rahul. If something leaf the kiersten and it is vehement then it is deductible. If the kiersten is deductible and the kiersten is malay then the kiersten does not see the jermain. If the rahul does not need the kiersten then the kiersten leaf the jermain. The janaya is deductible.", "logic": "\nShamanist(jermain)\nnot Vehement(jermain)\nRefit(jermain, kiersten)\nRefit(jermain, janaya)\nnot Leaf(jermain, rahul)\nLeaf(jermain, janaya)\nClassless(rahul)\nMalay(rahul)\nVehement(rahul)\nUncross(rahul, janaya)\nShamanist(kiersten)\nVehement(kiersten)\nVehement(janaya)\nRefit(janaya, jermain)\nRefit(janaya, kiersten)\nnot Uncross(janaya, jermain)\nforall x (Deductible(x) and Malay(x) -> Uncross(x, rahul))\nforall x (Uncross(x, kiersten) and Vehement(kiersten) -> Refit(kiersten, jermain))\nforall x (Shamanist(x) and Refit(x, jermain) -> Leaf(jermain, rahul))\nforall x (Uncross(x, janaya) and Vehement(x) -> Leaf(x, kiersten))\nforall x (Uncross(x, rahul) and Vehement(rahul) -> Leaf(x, rahul))\nforall x (Leaf(x, kiersten) and Vehement(x) -> Deductible(x))\nDeductible(kiersten) and Malay(kiersten) -> not Uncross(kiersten, jermain)\nnot Leaf(rahul, kiersten) -> Leaf(kiersten, jermain)\n\nDeductible(janaya)\n\nforall x (Leaf(x, kiersten) and Vehement(x) -> Deductible(x)) <- forall x (Uncross(x, janaya) and Vehement(x) -> Leaf(x, kiersten)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The elenore is interfaith. The elenore is not jesuitic. The elenore terrorize the rachael. The elenore terrorize the gera. The elenore does not need the edeline. The elenore distress the gera. The edeline is tenuous. The edeline is lowset. The edeline is jesuitic. The edeline calk the gera. The rachael is interfaith. The rachael is jesuitic. The gera is jesuitic. The gera terrorize the elenore. The gera terrorize the rachael. The gera does not see the elenore. If something is depressant and lowset then it calk the edeline. If something calk the rachael and the rachael is jesuitic then the rachael terrorize the elenore. If something is interfaith and it terrorize the elenore then the elenore distress the edeline. If something calk the gera and it is jesuitic then it distress the rachael. If something calk the edeline and the edeline is jesuitic then it distress the edeline. If something distress the rachael and it is jesuitic then it is depressant. If the rachael is depressant and the rachael is lowset then the rachael does not see the elenore. If the edeline does not need the rachael then the rachael distress the elenore. The gera does not see the edeline.", "logic": "\nInterfaith(elenore)\nnot Jesuitic(elenore)\nTerrorize(elenore, rachael)\nTerrorize(elenore, gera)\nnot Distress(elenore, edeline)\nDistress(elenore, gera)\nTenuous(edeline)\nLowset(edeline)\nJesuitic(edeline)\nCalk(edeline, gera)\nInterfaith(rachael)\nJesuitic(rachael)\nJesuitic(gera)\nTerrorize(gera, elenore)\nTerrorize(gera, rachael)\nnot Calk(gera, elenore)\nforall x (Depressant(x) and Lowset(x) -> Calk(x, edeline))\nforall x (Calk(x, rachael) and Jesuitic(rachael) -> Terrorize(rachael, elenore))\nforall x (Interfaith(x) and Terrorize(x, elenore) -> Distress(elenore, edeline))\nforall x (Calk(x, gera) and Jesuitic(x) -> Distress(x, rachael))\nforall x (Calk(x, edeline) and Jesuitic(edeline) -> Distress(x, edeline))\nforall x (Distress(x, rachael) and Jesuitic(x) -> Depressant(x))\nDepressant(rachael) and Lowset(rachael) -> not Calk(rachael, elenore)\nnot Distress(edeline, rachael) -> Distress(rachael, elenore)\n\nnot Calk(gera, edeline)\n\nforall x (Depressant(x) and Lowset(x) -> Calk(x, edeline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The shandee is overladen. The shandee is not relevant. The shandee rebuke the dorey. The shandee rebuke the kathryn. The shandee does not need the howie. The shandee interlude the kathryn. The howie is lobate. The howie is nepalese. The howie is relevant. The howie sniffle the kathryn. The dorey is overladen. The dorey is relevant. The kathryn is relevant. The kathryn rebuke the shandee. The kathryn rebuke the dorey. The kathryn does not see the shandee. If something is unleavened and nepalese then it sniffle the howie. If something sniffle the dorey and the dorey is relevant then the dorey rebuke the shandee. If something is overladen and it rebuke the shandee then the shandee interlude the howie. If something sniffle the kathryn and it is relevant then it interlude the dorey. If something sniffle the howie and the howie is relevant then it interlude the howie. If something interlude the dorey and it is relevant then it is unleavened. If the dorey is unleavened and the dorey is nepalese then the dorey does not see the shandee. If the howie does not need the dorey then the dorey interlude the shandee. The dorey is unleavened.", "logic": "\nOverladen(shandee)\nnot Relevant(shandee)\nRebuke(shandee, dorey)\nRebuke(shandee, kathryn)\nnot Interlude(shandee, howie)\nInterlude(shandee, kathryn)\nLobate(howie)\nNepalese(howie)\nRelevant(howie)\nSniffle(howie, kathryn)\nOverladen(dorey)\nRelevant(dorey)\nRelevant(kathryn)\nRebuke(kathryn, shandee)\nRebuke(kathryn, dorey)\nnot Sniffle(kathryn, shandee)\nforall x (Unleavened(x) and Nepalese(x) -> Sniffle(x, howie))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, dorey) and Relevant(dorey) -> Rebuke(dorey, shandee))\nforall x (Overladen(x) and Rebuke(x, shandee) -> Interlude(shandee, howie))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, kathryn) and Relevant(x) -> Interlude(x, dorey))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, howie) and Relevant(howie) -> Interlude(x, howie))\nforall x (Interlude(x, dorey) and Relevant(x) -> Unleavened(x))\nUnleavened(dorey) and Nepalese(dorey) -> not Sniffle(dorey, shandee)\nnot Interlude(howie, dorey) -> Interlude(dorey, shandee)\n\nUnleavened(dorey)\n\nforall x (Interlude(x, dorey) and Relevant(x) -> Unleavened(x)) <- forall x (Sniffle(x, kathryn) and Relevant(x) -> Interlude(x, dorey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The jaymee is formulary. The jaymee is not slopped. The jaymee neigh the costa. The jaymee neigh the suzetta. The jaymee does not need the janie. The jaymee foment the suzetta. The janie is diseased. The janie is polyphonic. The janie is slopped. The janie malt the suzetta. The costa is formulary. The costa is slopped. The suzetta is slopped. The suzetta neigh the jaymee. The suzetta neigh the costa. The suzetta does not see the jaymee. If something is whirring and polyphonic then it malt the janie. If something malt the costa and the costa is slopped then the costa neigh the jaymee. If something is formulary and it neigh the jaymee then the jaymee foment the janie. If something malt the suzetta and it is slopped then it foment the costa. If something malt the janie and the janie is slopped then it foment the janie. If something foment the costa and it is slopped then it is whirring. If the costa is whirring and the costa is polyphonic then the costa does not see the jaymee. If the janie does not need the costa then the costa foment the jaymee. The janie does not like the janie.", "logic": "\nFormulary(jaymee)\nnot Slopped(jaymee)\nNeigh(jaymee, costa)\nNeigh(jaymee, suzetta)\nnot Foment(jaymee, janie)\nFoment(jaymee, suzetta)\nDiseased(janie)\nPolyphonic(janie)\nSlopped(janie)\nMalt(janie, suzetta)\nFormulary(costa)\nSlopped(costa)\nSlopped(suzetta)\nNeigh(suzetta, jaymee)\nNeigh(suzetta, costa)\nnot Malt(suzetta, jaymee)\nforall x (Whirring(x) and Polyphonic(x) -> Malt(x, janie))\nforall x (Malt(x, costa) and Slopped(costa) -> Neigh(costa, jaymee))\nforall x (Formulary(x) and Neigh(x, jaymee) -> Foment(jaymee, janie))\nforall x (Malt(x, suzetta) and Slopped(x) -> Foment(x, costa))\nforall x (Malt(x, janie) and Slopped(janie) -> Foment(x, janie))\nforall x (Foment(x, costa) and Slopped(x) -> Whirring(x))\nWhirring(costa) and Polyphonic(costa) -> not Malt(costa, jaymee)\nnot Foment(janie, costa) -> Foment(costa, jaymee)\n\nnot Neigh(janie, janie)\n\nnot Neigh(janie, janie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The zerk is brownish. The zerk is not pubertal. The zerk disco the mimi. The zerk disco the mike. The zerk does not need the vickie. The zerk summarise the mike. The vickie is timeworn. The vickie is paved. The vickie is pubertal. The vickie preexist the mike. The mimi is brownish. The mimi is pubertal. The mike is pubertal. The mike disco the zerk. The mike disco the mimi. The mike does not see the zerk. If something is striate and paved then it preexist the vickie. If something preexist the mimi and the mimi is pubertal then the mimi disco the zerk. If something is brownish and it disco the zerk then the zerk summarise the vickie. If something preexist the mike and it is pubertal then it summarise the mimi. If something preexist the vickie and the vickie is pubertal then it summarise the vickie. If something summarise the mimi and it is pubertal then it is striate. If the mimi is striate and the mimi is paved then the mimi does not see the zerk. If the vickie does not need the mimi then the mimi summarise the zerk. The vickie preexist the mimi.", "logic": "\nBrownish(zerk)\nnot Pubertal(zerk)\nDisco(zerk, mimi)\nDisco(zerk, mike)\nnot Summarise(zerk, vickie)\nSummarise(zerk, mike)\nTimeworn(vickie)\nPaved(vickie)\nPubertal(vickie)\nPreexist(vickie, mike)\nBrownish(mimi)\nPubertal(mimi)\nPubertal(mike)\nDisco(mike, zerk)\nDisco(mike, mimi)\nnot Preexist(mike, zerk)\nforall x (Striate(x) and Paved(x) -> Preexist(x, vickie))\nforall x (Preexist(x, mimi) and Pubertal(mimi) -> Disco(mimi, zerk))\nforall x (Brownish(x) and Disco(x, zerk) -> Summarise(zerk, vickie))\nforall x (Preexist(x, mike) and Pubertal(x) -> Summarise(x, mimi))\nforall x (Preexist(x, vickie) and Pubertal(vickie) -> Summarise(x, vickie))\nforall x (Summarise(x, mimi) and Pubertal(x) -> Striate(x))\nStriate(mimi) and Paved(mimi) -> not Preexist(mimi, zerk)\nnot Summarise(vickie, mimi) -> Summarise(mimi, zerk)\n\nPreexist(vickie, mimi)\n\nPreexist(vickie, mimi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The dinah is commodious. The dinah is not marine. The dinah magnetise the redford. The dinah magnetise the alic. The dinah does not need the caryl. The dinah goldbrick the alic. The caryl is mullioned. The caryl is conducive. The caryl is marine. The caryl marry the alic. The redford is commodious. The redford is marine. The alic is marine. The alic magnetise the dinah. The alic magnetise the redford. The alic does not see the dinah. If something is worthy and conducive then it marry the caryl. If something marry the redford and the redford is marine then the redford magnetise the dinah. If something is commodious and it magnetise the dinah then the dinah goldbrick the caryl. If something marry the alic and it is marine then it goldbrick the redford. If something marry the caryl and the caryl is marine then it goldbrick the caryl. If something goldbrick the redford and it is marine then it is worthy. If the redford is worthy and the redford is conducive then the redford does not see the dinah. If the caryl does not need the redford then the redford goldbrick the dinah. The alic does not like the caryl.", "logic": "\nCommodious(dinah)\nnot Marine(dinah)\nMagnetise(dinah, redford)\nMagnetise(dinah, alic)\nnot Goldbrick(dinah, caryl)\nGoldbrick(dinah, alic)\nMullioned(caryl)\nConducive(caryl)\nMarine(caryl)\nMarry(caryl, alic)\nCommodious(redford)\nMarine(redford)\nMarine(alic)\nMagnetise(alic, dinah)\nMagnetise(alic, redford)\nnot Marry(alic, dinah)\nforall x (Worthy(x) and Conducive(x) -> Marry(x, caryl))\nforall x (Marry(x, redford) and Marine(redford) -> Magnetise(redford, dinah))\nforall x (Commodious(x) and Magnetise(x, dinah) -> Goldbrick(dinah, caryl))\nforall x (Marry(x, alic) and Marine(x) -> Goldbrick(x, redford))\nforall x (Marry(x, caryl) and Marine(caryl) -> Goldbrick(x, caryl))\nforall x (Goldbrick(x, redford) and Marine(x) -> Worthy(x))\nWorthy(redford) and Conducive(redford) -> not Marry(redford, dinah)\nnot Goldbrick(caryl, redford) -> Goldbrick(redford, dinah)\n\nnot Magnetise(alic, caryl)\n\nnot Magnetise(alic, caryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The lawson is trim. The lawson is not palmy. The lawson unsex the natale. The lawson unsex the lazar. The lawson does not need the carmel. The lawson empower the lazar. The carmel is indelicate. The carmel is brimfull. The carmel is palmy. The carmel singe the lazar. The natale is trim. The natale is palmy. The lazar is palmy. The lazar unsex the lawson. The lazar unsex the natale. The lazar does not see the lawson. If something is sketchy and brimfull then it singe the carmel. If something singe the natale and the natale is palmy then the natale unsex the lawson. If something is trim and it unsex the lawson then the lawson empower the carmel. If something singe the lazar and it is palmy then it empower the natale. If something singe the carmel and the carmel is palmy then it empower the carmel. If something empower the natale and it is palmy then it is sketchy. If the natale is sketchy and the natale is brimfull then the natale does not see the lawson. If the carmel does not need the natale then the natale empower the lawson. The carmel unsex the lazar.", "logic": "\nTrim(lawson)\nnot Palmy(lawson)\nUnsex(lawson, natale)\nUnsex(lawson, lazar)\nnot Empower(lawson, carmel)\nEmpower(lawson, lazar)\nIndelicate(carmel)\nBrimfull(carmel)\nPalmy(carmel)\nSinge(carmel, lazar)\nTrim(natale)\nPalmy(natale)\nPalmy(lazar)\nUnsex(lazar, lawson)\nUnsex(lazar, natale)\nnot Singe(lazar, lawson)\nforall x (Sketchy(x) and Brimfull(x) -> Singe(x, carmel))\nforall x (Singe(x, natale) and Palmy(natale) -> Unsex(natale, lawson))\nforall x (Trim(x) and Unsex(x, lawson) -> Empower(lawson, carmel))\nforall x (Singe(x, lazar) and Palmy(x) -> Empower(x, natale))\nforall x (Singe(x, carmel) and Palmy(carmel) -> Empower(x, carmel))\nforall x (Empower(x, natale) and Palmy(x) -> Sketchy(x))\nSketchy(natale) and Brimfull(natale) -> not Singe(natale, lawson)\nnot Empower(carmel, natale) -> Empower(natale, lawson)\n\nUnsex(carmel, lazar)\n\nUnsex(carmel, lazar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1568"} {"premises": "The jeane does not chase the danika. The jeane poniard the vittoria. The jeane is unearned. The jeane is grouchy. The jeane is levantine. The jeane severalize the danika. The jeane severalize the vittoria. The jeane abduce the danika. The jeane abduce the vittoria. The danika is not gainly. The danika is not succinic. The danika is unearned. The danika abduce the jeane. The danika abduce the vittoria. The vittoria poniard the jeane. The vittoria abduce the danika. If someone severalize the jeane then they are grouchy. If someone abduce the jeane and they visit the vittoria then they are grouchy. If someone severalize the vittoria and the vittoria does not chase the danika then they do not visit the jeane. If someone poniard the jeane and they like the jeane then they chase the vittoria. If someone abduce the vittoria and they like the vittoria then the vittoria is unearned. If someone severalize the danika then the danika severalize the vittoria. If someone severalize the danika then the danika abduce the vittoria. If the vittoria does not visit the jeane then the jeane poniard the vittoria. The danika is not gainly.", "logic": "\nnot Poniard(jeane, danika)\nPoniard(jeane, vittoria)\nUnearned(jeane)\nGrouchy(jeane)\nLevantine(jeane)\nSeveralize(jeane, danika)\nSeveralize(jeane, vittoria)\nAbduce(jeane, danika)\nAbduce(jeane, vittoria)\nnot Gainly(danika)\nnot Succinic(danika)\nUnearned(danika)\nAbduce(danika, jeane)\nAbduce(danika, vittoria)\nPoniard(vittoria, jeane)\nAbduce(vittoria, danika)\nforall x (Severalize(x, jeane) -> Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Abduce(x, jeane) and Abduce(x, vittoria) -> Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Severalize(x, vittoria) and not Poniard(vittoria, danika) -> not Abduce(x, jeane))\nforall x (Poniard(x, jeane) and Severalize(x, jeane) -> Poniard(x, vittoria))\nforall x (Abduce(x, vittoria) and Severalize(x, vittoria) -> Unearned(vittoria))\nforall x (Severalize(x, danika) -> Severalize(danika, vittoria))\nforall x (Severalize(x, danika) -> Abduce(danika, vittoria))\nnot Abduce(vittoria, jeane) -> Poniard(jeane, vittoria)\n\nnot Gainly(danika)\n\ntherefore not Gainly(danika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-556"} {"premises": "The jedediah does not chase the phoebe. The jedediah pride the odelinda. The jedediah is numb. The jedediah is rotted. The jedediah is pineal. The jedediah prang the phoebe. The jedediah prang the odelinda. The jedediah moulder the phoebe. The jedediah moulder the odelinda. The phoebe is not fruticose. The phoebe is not unvoiced. The phoebe is numb. The phoebe moulder the jedediah. The phoebe moulder the odelinda. The odelinda pride the jedediah. The odelinda moulder the phoebe. If someone prang the jedediah then they are rotted. If someone moulder the jedediah and they visit the odelinda then they are rotted. If someone prang the odelinda and the odelinda does not chase the phoebe then they do not visit the jedediah. If someone pride the jedediah and they like the jedediah then they chase the odelinda. If someone moulder the odelinda and they like the odelinda then the odelinda is numb. If someone prang the phoebe then the phoebe prang the odelinda. If someone prang the phoebe then the phoebe moulder the odelinda. If the odelinda does not visit the jedediah then the jedediah pride the odelinda. The jedediah does not visit the odelinda.", "logic": "\nnot Pride(jedediah, phoebe)\nPride(jedediah, odelinda)\nNumb(jedediah)\nRotted(jedediah)\nPineal(jedediah)\nPrang(jedediah, phoebe)\nPrang(jedediah, odelinda)\nMoulder(jedediah, phoebe)\nMoulder(jedediah, odelinda)\nnot Fruticose(phoebe)\nnot Unvoiced(phoebe)\nNumb(phoebe)\nMoulder(phoebe, jedediah)\nMoulder(phoebe, odelinda)\nPride(odelinda, jedediah)\nMoulder(odelinda, phoebe)\nforall x (Prang(x, jedediah) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Moulder(x, jedediah) and Moulder(x, odelinda) -> Rotted(x))\nforall x (Prang(x, odelinda) and not Pride(odelinda, phoebe) -> not Moulder(x, jedediah))\nforall x (Pride(x, jedediah) and Prang(x, jedediah) -> Pride(x, odelinda))\nforall x (Moulder(x, odelinda) and Prang(x, odelinda) -> Numb(odelinda))\nforall x (Prang(x, phoebe) -> Prang(phoebe, odelinda))\nforall x (Prang(x, phoebe) -> Moulder(phoebe, odelinda))\nnot Moulder(odelinda, jedediah) -> Pride(jedediah, odelinda)\n\nnot Moulder(jedediah, odelinda)\n\ntherefore Moulder(jedediah, odelinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-556"} {"premises": "The vonni does not chase the torrance. The vonni streetwalk the jessica. The vonni is authorised. The vonni is blissful. The vonni is sixteen. The vonni initialize the torrance. The vonni initialize the jessica. The vonni besmirch the torrance. The vonni besmirch the jessica. The torrance is not queasy. The torrance is not hominal. The torrance is authorised. The torrance besmirch the vonni. The torrance besmirch the jessica. The jessica streetwalk the vonni. The jessica besmirch the torrance. If someone initialize the vonni then they are blissful. If someone besmirch the vonni and they visit the jessica then they are blissful. If someone initialize the jessica and the jessica does not chase the torrance then they do not visit the vonni. If someone streetwalk the vonni and they like the vonni then they chase the jessica. If someone besmirch the jessica and they like the jessica then the jessica is authorised. If someone initialize the torrance then the torrance initialize the jessica. If someone initialize the torrance then the torrance besmirch the jessica. If the jessica does not visit the vonni then the vonni streetwalk the jessica. The torrance does not chase the jessica.", "logic": "\nnot Streetwalk(vonni, torrance)\nStreetwalk(vonni, jessica)\nAuthorised(vonni)\nBlissful(vonni)\nSixteen(vonni)\nInitialize(vonni, torrance)\nInitialize(vonni, jessica)\nBesmirch(vonni, torrance)\nBesmirch(vonni, jessica)\nnot Queasy(torrance)\nnot Hominal(torrance)\nAuthorised(torrance)\nBesmirch(torrance, vonni)\nBesmirch(torrance, jessica)\nStreetwalk(jessica, vonni)\nBesmirch(jessica, torrance)\nforall x (Initialize(x, vonni) -> Blissful(x))\nforall x (Besmirch(x, vonni) and Besmirch(x, jessica) -> Blissful(x))\nforall x (Initialize(x, jessica) and not Streetwalk(jessica, torrance) -> not Besmirch(x, vonni))\nforall x (Streetwalk(x, vonni) and Initialize(x, vonni) -> Streetwalk(x, jessica))\nforall x (Besmirch(x, jessica) and Initialize(x, jessica) -> Authorised(jessica))\nforall x (Initialize(x, torrance) -> Initialize(torrance, jessica))\nforall x (Initialize(x, torrance) -> Besmirch(torrance, jessica))\nnot Besmirch(jessica, vonni) -> Streetwalk(vonni, jessica)\n\nnot Streetwalk(torrance, jessica)\n\nforall x (Streetwalk(x, vonni) and Initialize(x, vonni) -> Streetwalk(x, jessica)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-556"} {"premises": "The lucky does not chase the charlott. The lucky restart the channa. The lucky is most. The lucky is bootleg. The lucky is ovarian. The lucky thread the charlott. The lucky thread the channa. The lucky monopolise the charlott. The lucky monopolise the channa. The charlott is not swept. The charlott is not sliced. The charlott is most. The charlott monopolise the lucky. The charlott monopolise the channa. The channa restart the lucky. The channa monopolise the charlott. If someone thread the lucky then they are bootleg. If someone monopolise the lucky and they visit the channa then they are bootleg. If someone thread the channa and the channa does not chase the charlott then they do not visit the lucky. If someone restart the lucky and they like the lucky then they chase the channa. If someone monopolise the channa and they like the channa then the channa is most. If someone thread the charlott then the charlott thread the channa. If someone thread the charlott then the charlott monopolise the channa. If the channa does not visit the lucky then the lucky restart the channa. The charlott monopolise the charlott.", "logic": "\nnot Restart(lucky, charlott)\nRestart(lucky, channa)\nMost(lucky)\nBootleg(lucky)\nOvarian(lucky)\nThread(lucky, charlott)\nThread(lucky, channa)\nMonopolise(lucky, charlott)\nMonopolise(lucky, channa)\nnot Swept(charlott)\nnot Sliced(charlott)\nMost(charlott)\nMonopolise(charlott, lucky)\nMonopolise(charlott, channa)\nRestart(channa, lucky)\nMonopolise(channa, charlott)\nforall x (Thread(x, lucky) -> Bootleg(x))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, lucky) and Monopolise(x, channa) -> Bootleg(x))\nforall x (Thread(x, channa) and not Restart(channa, charlott) -> not Monopolise(x, lucky))\nforall x (Restart(x, lucky) and Thread(x, lucky) -> Restart(x, channa))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, channa) and Thread(x, channa) -> Most(channa))\nforall x (Thread(x, charlott) -> Thread(charlott, channa))\nforall x (Thread(x, charlott) -> Monopolise(charlott, channa))\nnot Monopolise(channa, lucky) -> Restart(lucky, channa)\n\nMonopolise(charlott, charlott)\n\nMonopolise(charlott, charlott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-556"} {"premises": "Laryssa is autacoidal. If someone is autacoidal and spineless then they are biped. If someone is nescient then they are biped. If someone is sphingine and nescient then they are not biped. If someone is biped then they are nescient. If someone is nescient and crude then they are nonverbal. White people are spineless. Laryssa is autacoidal.", "logic": "\nAutacoidal(laryssa)\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and Spineless(x) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Sphingine(x) and Nescient(x) -> not Biped(x))\nforall x (Biped(x) -> Nescient(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) and Crude(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) -> Spineless(x))\n\nAutacoidal(laryssa)\n\ntherefore Autacoidal(laryssa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Abdul is fanatic. If someone is fanatic and intoned then they are peaky. If someone is unbaffled then they are peaky. If someone is epical and unbaffled then they are not peaky. If someone is peaky then they are unbaffled. If someone is unbaffled and flaxen then they are fatheaded. White people are intoned. Abdul is not fanatic.", "logic": "\nFanatic(abdul)\nforall x (Fanatic(x) and Intoned(x) -> Peaky(x))\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) -> Peaky(x))\nforall x (Epical(x) and Unbaffled(x) -> not Peaky(x))\nforall x (Peaky(x) -> Unbaffled(x))\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) and Flaxen(x) -> Fatheaded(x))\nforall x (Fanatic(x) -> Intoned(x))\n\nnot Fanatic(abdul)\n\ntherefore Fanatic(abdul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Godiva is wealthy. If someone is wealthy and ammonitic then they are lamblike. If someone is translunar then they are lamblike. If someone is taiwanese and translunar then they are not lamblike. If someone is lamblike then they are translunar. If someone is translunar and munificent then they are shipshape. White people are ammonitic. Godiva is ammonitic.", "logic": "\nWealthy(godiva)\nforall x (Wealthy(x) and Ammonitic(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) and Translunar(x) -> not Lamblike(x))\nforall x (Lamblike(x) -> Translunar(x))\nforall x (Translunar(x) and Munificent(x) -> Shipshape(x))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) -> Ammonitic(x))\n\nAmmonitic(godiva)\n\nWealthy(godiva) and forall x (Wealthy(x) -> Ammonitic(x)) -> therefore Ammonitic(godiva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Jeannie is cuddly. If someone is cuddly and oppressive then they are murderous. If someone is teeming then they are murderous. If someone is lento and teeming then they are not murderous. If someone is murderous then they are teeming. If someone is teeming and monoclinic then they are arco. White people are oppressive. Jeannie is not oppressive.", "logic": "\nCuddly(jeannie)\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and Oppressive(x) -> Murderous(x))\nforall x (Teeming(x) -> Murderous(x))\nforall x (Lento(x) and Teeming(x) -> not Murderous(x))\nforall x (Murderous(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Teeming(x) and Monoclinic(x) -> Arco(x))\nforall x (Cuddly(x) -> Oppressive(x))\n\nnot Oppressive(jeannie)\n\nCuddly(jeannie) and forall x (Cuddly(x) -> Oppressive(x)) -> therefore Oppressive(jeannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Robinett is operose. If someone is operose and enjoyable then they are collusive. If someone is invariable then they are collusive. If someone is opencast and invariable then they are not collusive. If someone is collusive then they are invariable. If someone is invariable and fossilized then they are cloisonne. White people are enjoyable. Robinett is collusive.", "logic": "\nOperose(robinett)\nforall x (Operose(x) and Enjoyable(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Opencast(x) and Invariable(x) -> not Collusive(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) and Fossilized(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\nforall x (Operose(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\n\nCollusive(robinett)\n\nOperose(robinett) and forall x (Operose(x) -> Enjoyable(x)) -> therefore Enjoyable(robinett) Operose(robinett) and Enjoyable(robinett) and forall x (Operose(x) and Enjoyable(x) -> Collusive(x)) -> therefore Collusive(robinett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Fred is syndetic. If someone is syndetic and shinto then they are ideal. If someone is disquieted then they are ideal. If someone is tried and disquieted then they are not ideal. If someone is ideal then they are disquieted. If someone is disquieted and westward then they are hallowed. White people are shinto. Fred is not ideal.", "logic": "\nSyndetic(fred)\nforall x (Syndetic(x) and Shinto(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Disquieted(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Tried(x) and Disquieted(x) -> not Ideal(x))\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Disquieted(x))\nforall x (Disquieted(x) and Westward(x) -> Hallowed(x))\nforall x (Syndetic(x) -> Shinto(x))\n\nnot Ideal(fred)\n\nSyndetic(fred) and forall x (Syndetic(x) -> Shinto(x)) -> therefore Shinto(fred) Syndetic(fred) and Shinto(fred) and forall x (Syndetic(x) and Shinto(x) -> Ideal(x)) -> therefore Ideal(fred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Yovonnda is reverent. If someone is reverent and unused then they are enthralled. If someone is rupicolous then they are enthralled. If someone is lxiii and rupicolous then they are not enthralled. If someone is enthralled then they are rupicolous. If someone is rupicolous and weary then they are shining. White people are unused. Yovonnda is rupicolous.", "logic": "\nReverent(yovonnda)\nforall x (Reverent(x) and Unused(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Lxiii(x) and Rupicolous(x) -> not Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Enthralled(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) and Weary(x) -> Shining(x))\nforall x (Reverent(x) -> Unused(x))\n\nRupicolous(yovonnda)\n\nReverent(yovonnda) and forall x (Reverent(x) -> Unused(x)) -> therefore Unused(yovonnda) Reverent(yovonnda) and Unused(yovonnda) and forall x (Reverent(x) and Unused(x) -> Enthralled(x)) -> therefore Enthralled(yovonnda) Enthralled(yovonnda) and forall x (Enthralled(x) -> Rupicolous(x)) -> therefore Rupicolous(yovonnda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Donn is fell. If someone is fell and agonized then they are swart. If someone is aweary then they are swart. If someone is edematous and aweary then they are not swart. If someone is swart then they are aweary. If someone is aweary and onside then they are adjunct. White people are agonized. Donn is not aweary.", "logic": "\nFell(donn)\nforall x (Fell(x) and Agonized(x) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Aweary(x) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Edematous(x) and Aweary(x) -> not Swart(x))\nforall x (Swart(x) -> Aweary(x))\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Onside(x) -> Adjunct(x))\nforall x (Fell(x) -> Agonized(x))\n\nnot Aweary(donn)\n\nFell(donn) and forall x (Fell(x) -> Agonized(x)) -> therefore Agonized(donn) Fell(donn) and Agonized(donn) and forall x (Fell(x) and Agonized(x) -> Swart(x)) -> therefore Swart(donn) Swart(donn) and forall x (Swart(x) -> Aweary(x)) -> therefore Aweary(donn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Roshelle is sedate. If someone is sedate and forked then they are grasslike. If someone is vaned then they are grasslike. If someone is ninetieth and vaned then they are not grasslike. If someone is grasslike then they are vaned. If someone is vaned and disfigured then they are ammoniac. White people are forked. Roshelle is not ammoniac.", "logic": "\nSedate(roshelle)\nforall x (Sedate(x) and Forked(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) and Vaned(x) -> not Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Vaned(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) and Disfigured(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) -> Forked(x))\n\nnot Ammoniac(roshelle)\n\nforall x (Vaned(x) and Disfigured(x) -> Ammoniac(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Lemar is toothlike. If someone is toothlike and mammoth then they are unblinking. If someone is wispy then they are unblinking. If someone is slanderous and wispy then they are not unblinking. If someone is unblinking then they are wispy. If someone is wispy and cragged then they are protestant. White people are mammoth. Lemar is slanderous.", "logic": "\nToothlike(lemar)\nforall x (Toothlike(x) and Mammoth(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Wispy(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Wispy(x) -> not Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Unblinking(x) -> Wispy(x))\nforall x (Wispy(x) and Cragged(x) -> Protestant(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Mammoth(x))\n\nSlanderous(lemar)\n\nSlanderous(lemar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1441"} {"premises": "Jammie is prolusory. Jammie is comburent. Jammie is delusional. Jammie is ethnic. Jammie is latent. Jammie is archaean. Leilah is latent. Karim is comburent. Karim is void. Karim is ethnic. Karim is latent. Karim is archaean. Merrili is prolusory. Merrili is delusional. Merrili is ethnic. Merrili is latent. All latent people are prolusory. Quiet, comburent people are archaean. Merrili is ethnic.", "logic": "\nProlusory(jammie)\nComburent(jammie)\nDelusional(jammie)\nEthnic(jammie)\nLatent(jammie)\nArchaean(jammie)\nLatent(leilah)\nComburent(karim)\nVoid(karim)\nEthnic(karim)\nLatent(karim)\nArchaean(karim)\nProlusory(merrili)\nDelusional(merrili)\nEthnic(merrili)\nLatent(merrili)\nforall x (Latent(x) -> Prolusory(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) and Comburent(x) -> Archaean(x))\n\nEthnic(merrili)\n\ntherefore Ethnic(merrili)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4652"} {"premises": "Carri is birchen. Carri is algebraic. Carri is overseas. Carri is accepting. Carri is unsmoothed. Carri is farseeing. Ruddie is unsmoothed. Natassia is algebraic. Natassia is stripped. Natassia is accepting. Natassia is unsmoothed. Natassia is farseeing. Thaddus is birchen. Thaddus is overseas. Thaddus is accepting. Thaddus is unsmoothed. All unsmoothed people are birchen. Quiet, algebraic people are farseeing. Ruddie is not unsmoothed.", "logic": "\nBirchen(carri)\nAlgebraic(carri)\nOverseas(carri)\nAccepting(carri)\nUnsmoothed(carri)\nFarseeing(carri)\nUnsmoothed(ruddie)\nAlgebraic(natassia)\nStripped(natassia)\nAccepting(natassia)\nUnsmoothed(natassia)\nFarseeing(natassia)\nBirchen(thaddus)\nOverseas(thaddus)\nAccepting(thaddus)\nUnsmoothed(thaddus)\nforall x (Unsmoothed(x) -> Birchen(x))\nforall x (Accepting(x) and Algebraic(x) -> Farseeing(x))\n\nnot Unsmoothed(ruddie)\n\ntherefore Unsmoothed(ruddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4652"} {"premises": "Margaux is fabian. Margaux is dishy. Margaux is generative. Margaux is leafy. Margaux is belarusian. Margaux is thoriated. Von is belarusian. Amos is dishy. Amos is stated. Amos is leafy. Amos is belarusian. Amos is thoriated. Concordia is fabian. Concordia is generative. Concordia is leafy. Concordia is belarusian. All belarusian people are fabian. Quiet, dishy people are thoriated. Concordia is not thoriated.", "logic": "\nFabian(margaux)\nDishy(margaux)\nGenerative(margaux)\nLeafy(margaux)\nBelarusian(margaux)\nThoriated(margaux)\nBelarusian(von)\nDishy(amos)\nStated(amos)\nLeafy(amos)\nBelarusian(amos)\nThoriated(amos)\nFabian(concordia)\nGenerative(concordia)\nLeafy(concordia)\nBelarusian(concordia)\nforall x (Belarusian(x) -> Fabian(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) and Dishy(x) -> Thoriated(x))\n\nnot Thoriated(concordia)\n\nforall x (Leafy(x) and Dishy(x) -> Thoriated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4652"} {"premises": "Damien is ectodermic. Damien is occipital. Damien is deranged. Damien is soundproof. Damien is unkept. Damien is masculine. Carmel is unkept. Flossie is occipital. Flossie is mothy. Flossie is soundproof. Flossie is unkept. Flossie is masculine. Spense is ectodermic. Spense is deranged. Spense is soundproof. Spense is unkept. All unkept people are ectodermic. Quiet, occipital people are masculine. Carmel is mothy.", "logic": "\nEctodermic(damien)\nOccipital(damien)\nDeranged(damien)\nSoundproof(damien)\nUnkept(damien)\nMasculine(damien)\nUnkept(carmel)\nOccipital(flossie)\nMothy(flossie)\nSoundproof(flossie)\nUnkept(flossie)\nMasculine(flossie)\nEctodermic(spense)\nDeranged(spense)\nSoundproof(spense)\nUnkept(spense)\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Ectodermic(x))\nforall x (Soundproof(x) and Occipital(x) -> Masculine(x))\n\nMothy(carmel)\n\nMothy(carmel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4652"} {"premises": "Jessamyn is unsleeping. Jessamyn is asteroidal. Astrix is cyanophyte. Astrix is desirable. Astrix is urban. Astrix is grizzly. Astrix is floating. Astrix is asteroidal. Prent is cyanophyte. Prent is unsleeping. Prent is desirable. Prent is urban. Prent is grizzly. Prent is floating. Prent is asteroidal. All cyanophyte things are floating. Smart, desirable things are urban. All floating things are desirable. If something is grizzly then it is asteroidal. Green things are floating. If something is grizzly and cyanophyte then it is floating. Astrix is floating.", "logic": "\nUnsleeping(jessamyn)\nAsteroidal(jessamyn)\nCyanophyte(astrix)\nDesirable(astrix)\nUrban(astrix)\nGrizzly(astrix)\nFloating(astrix)\nAsteroidal(astrix)\nCyanophyte(prent)\nUnsleeping(prent)\nDesirable(prent)\nUrban(prent)\nGrizzly(prent)\nFloating(prent)\nAsteroidal(prent)\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) -> Floating(x))\nforall x (Floating(x) and Desirable(x) -> Urban(x))\nforall x (Floating(x) -> Desirable(x))\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) -> Floating(x))\nforall x (Grizzly(x) and Cyanophyte(x) -> Floating(x))\n\nFloating(astrix)\n\ntherefore Floating(astrix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Shari is rivalrous. Shari is formulated. Kitti is bothered. Kitti is sinistral. Kitti is soft. Kitti is tricky. Kitti is ravaging. Kitti is formulated. Beitris is bothered. Beitris is rivalrous. Beitris is sinistral. Beitris is soft. Beitris is tricky. Beitris is ravaging. Beitris is formulated. All bothered things are ravaging. Smart, sinistral things are soft. All ravaging things are sinistral. If something is tricky then it is formulated. Green things are ravaging. If something is tricky and bothered then it is ravaging. Kitti is not tricky.", "logic": "\nRivalrous(shari)\nFormulated(shari)\nBothered(kitti)\nSinistral(kitti)\nSoft(kitti)\nTricky(kitti)\nRavaging(kitti)\nFormulated(kitti)\nBothered(beitris)\nRivalrous(beitris)\nSinistral(beitris)\nSoft(beitris)\nTricky(beitris)\nRavaging(beitris)\nFormulated(beitris)\nforall x (Bothered(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Sinistral(x))\nforall x (Tricky(x) -> Formulated(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Tricky(x) and Bothered(x) -> Ravaging(x))\n\nnot Tricky(kitti)\n\ntherefore Tricky(kitti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Virgil is pricey. Virgil is verbatim. Xever is sensuous. Xever is docile. Xever is xcviii. Xever is unblended. Xever is cambodian. Xever is verbatim. Nert is sensuous. Nert is pricey. Nert is docile. Nert is xcviii. Nert is unblended. Nert is cambodian. Nert is verbatim. All sensuous things are cambodian. Smart, docile things are xcviii. All cambodian things are docile. If something is unblended then it is verbatim. Green things are cambodian. If something is unblended and sensuous then it is cambodian. Virgil is cambodian.", "logic": "\nPricey(virgil)\nVerbatim(virgil)\nSensuous(xever)\nDocile(xever)\nXcviii(xever)\nUnblended(xever)\nCambodian(xever)\nVerbatim(xever)\nSensuous(nert)\nPricey(nert)\nDocile(nert)\nXcviii(nert)\nUnblended(nert)\nCambodian(nert)\nVerbatim(nert)\nforall x (Sensuous(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and Docile(x) -> Xcviii(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) -> Docile(x))\nforall x (Unblended(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Pricey(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Unblended(x) and Sensuous(x) -> Cambodian(x))\n\nCambodian(virgil)\n\nPricey(virgil) and forall x (Pricey(x) -> Cambodian(x)) -> therefore Cambodian(virgil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Beaufort is focussed. Beaufort is corinthian. Bellamy is balmy. Bellamy is phonologic. Bellamy is ostensible. Bellamy is ungroomed. Bellamy is looseleaf. Bellamy is corinthian. Larry is balmy. Larry is focussed. Larry is phonologic. Larry is ostensible. Larry is ungroomed. Larry is looseleaf. Larry is corinthian. All balmy things are looseleaf. Smart, phonologic things are ostensible. All looseleaf things are phonologic. If something is ungroomed then it is corinthian. Green things are looseleaf. If something is ungroomed and balmy then it is looseleaf. Beaufort is not looseleaf.", "logic": "\nFocussed(beaufort)\nCorinthian(beaufort)\nBalmy(bellamy)\nPhonologic(bellamy)\nOstensible(bellamy)\nUngroomed(bellamy)\nLooseleaf(bellamy)\nCorinthian(bellamy)\nBalmy(larry)\nFocussed(larry)\nPhonologic(larry)\nOstensible(larry)\nUngroomed(larry)\nLooseleaf(larry)\nCorinthian(larry)\nforall x (Balmy(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) and Phonologic(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Phonologic(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Focussed(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) and Balmy(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\n\nnot Looseleaf(beaufort)\n\nFocussed(beaufort) and forall x (Focussed(x) -> Looseleaf(x)) -> therefore Looseleaf(beaufort)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Faith is lank. Faith is bullheaded. Urson is praetorian. Urson is voluptuous. Urson is unbowed. Urson is waspish. Urson is oleaginous. Urson is bullheaded. Uli is praetorian. Uli is lank. Uli is voluptuous. Uli is unbowed. Uli is waspish. Uli is oleaginous. Uli is bullheaded. All praetorian things are oleaginous. Smart, voluptuous things are unbowed. All oleaginous things are voluptuous. If something is waspish then it is bullheaded. Green things are oleaginous. If something is waspish and praetorian then it is oleaginous. Faith is voluptuous.", "logic": "\nLank(faith)\nBullheaded(faith)\nPraetorian(urson)\nVoluptuous(urson)\nUnbowed(urson)\nWaspish(urson)\nOleaginous(urson)\nBullheaded(urson)\nPraetorian(uli)\nLank(uli)\nVoluptuous(uli)\nUnbowed(uli)\nWaspish(uli)\nOleaginous(uli)\nBullheaded(uli)\nforall x (Praetorian(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and Voluptuous(x) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Voluptuous(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> Bullheaded(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) and Praetorian(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\n\nVoluptuous(faith)\n\nLank(faith) and forall x (Lank(x) -> Oleaginous(x)) -> therefore Oleaginous(faith) Oleaginous(faith) and forall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Voluptuous(x)) -> therefore Voluptuous(faith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Farica is awake. Farica is tributary. Ibby is thematic. Ibby is cleansing. Ibby is intragroup. Ibby is agrarian. Ibby is lingulate. Ibby is tributary. Dwane is thematic. Dwane is awake. Dwane is cleansing. Dwane is intragroup. Dwane is agrarian. Dwane is lingulate. Dwane is tributary. All thematic things are lingulate. Smart, cleansing things are intragroup. All lingulate things are cleansing. If something is agrarian then it is tributary. Green things are lingulate. If something is agrarian and thematic then it is lingulate. Farica is not cleansing.", "logic": "\nAwake(farica)\nTributary(farica)\nThematic(ibby)\nCleansing(ibby)\nIntragroup(ibby)\nAgrarian(ibby)\nLingulate(ibby)\nTributary(ibby)\nThematic(dwane)\nAwake(dwane)\nCleansing(dwane)\nIntragroup(dwane)\nAgrarian(dwane)\nLingulate(dwane)\nTributary(dwane)\nforall x (Thematic(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Lingulate(x) and Cleansing(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Lingulate(x) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) -> Tributary(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Agrarian(x) and Thematic(x) -> Lingulate(x))\n\nnot Cleansing(farica)\n\nAwake(farica) and forall x (Awake(x) -> Lingulate(x)) -> therefore Lingulate(farica) Lingulate(farica) and forall x (Lingulate(x) -> Cleansing(x)) -> therefore Cleansing(farica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Brenn is impious. Brenn is gaunt. Hazel is theistical. Hazel is squiffy. Hazel is cackly. Hazel is common. Hazel is zonal. Hazel is gaunt. Pincas is theistical. Pincas is impious. Pincas is squiffy. Pincas is cackly. Pincas is common. Pincas is zonal. Pincas is gaunt. All theistical things are zonal. Smart, squiffy things are cackly. All zonal things are squiffy. If something is common then it is gaunt. Green things are zonal. If something is common and theistical then it is zonal. Brenn is cackly.", "logic": "\nImpious(brenn)\nGaunt(brenn)\nTheistical(hazel)\nSquiffy(hazel)\nCackly(hazel)\nCommon(hazel)\nZonal(hazel)\nGaunt(hazel)\nTheistical(pincas)\nImpious(pincas)\nSquiffy(pincas)\nCackly(pincas)\nCommon(pincas)\nZonal(pincas)\nGaunt(pincas)\nforall x (Theistical(x) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Squiffy(x) -> Cackly(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) -> Squiffy(x))\nforall x (Common(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Zonal(x))\nforall x (Common(x) and Theistical(x) -> Zonal(x))\n\nCackly(brenn)\n\nImpious(brenn) and forall x (Impious(x) -> Zonal(x)) -> therefore Zonal(brenn) Impious(brenn) and forall x (Impious(x) -> Zonal(x)) -> therefore Zonal(brenn) Zonal(brenn) and forall x (Zonal(x) -> Squiffy(x)) -> therefore Squiffy(brenn) Zonal(brenn) and Squiffy(brenn) and forall x (Zonal(x) and Squiffy(x) -> Cackly(x)) -> therefore Cackly(brenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Alexina is untroubled. Alexina is tutorial. Mortimer is disabling. Mortimer is wedged. Mortimer is eminent. Mortimer is solar. Mortimer is uneconomic. Mortimer is tutorial. Broderick is disabling. Broderick is untroubled. Broderick is wedged. Broderick is eminent. Broderick is solar. Broderick is uneconomic. Broderick is tutorial. All disabling things are uneconomic. Smart, wedged things are eminent. All uneconomic things are wedged. If something is solar then it is tutorial. Green things are uneconomic. If something is solar and disabling then it is uneconomic. Alexina is not eminent.", "logic": "\nUntroubled(alexina)\nTutorial(alexina)\nDisabling(mortimer)\nWedged(mortimer)\nEminent(mortimer)\nSolar(mortimer)\nUneconomic(mortimer)\nTutorial(mortimer)\nDisabling(broderick)\nUntroubled(broderick)\nWedged(broderick)\nEminent(broderick)\nSolar(broderick)\nUneconomic(broderick)\nTutorial(broderick)\nforall x (Disabling(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) and Wedged(x) -> Eminent(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) -> Wedged(x))\nforall x (Solar(x) -> Tutorial(x))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Solar(x) and Disabling(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\n\nnot Eminent(alexina)\n\nUntroubled(alexina) and forall x (Untroubled(x) -> Uneconomic(x)) -> therefore Uneconomic(alexina) Untroubled(alexina) and forall x (Untroubled(x) -> Uneconomic(x)) -> therefore Uneconomic(alexina) Uneconomic(alexina) and forall x (Uneconomic(x) -> Wedged(x)) -> therefore Wedged(alexina) Uneconomic(alexina) and Wedged(alexina) and forall x (Uneconomic(x) and Wedged(x) -> Eminent(x)) -> therefore Eminent(alexina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Gusty is stringent. Gusty is attenuated. Iago is maverick. Iago is foolish. Iago is carotid. Iago is isogonic. Iago is dreamy. Iago is attenuated. Darcie is maverick. Darcie is stringent. Darcie is foolish. Darcie is carotid. Darcie is isogonic. Darcie is dreamy. Darcie is attenuated. All maverick things are dreamy. Smart, foolish things are carotid. All dreamy things are foolish. If something is isogonic then it is attenuated. Green things are dreamy. If something is isogonic and maverick then it is dreamy. Gusty is not maverick.", "logic": "\nStringent(gusty)\nAttenuated(gusty)\nMaverick(iago)\nFoolish(iago)\nCarotid(iago)\nIsogonic(iago)\nDreamy(iago)\nAttenuated(iago)\nMaverick(darcie)\nStringent(darcie)\nFoolish(darcie)\nCarotid(darcie)\nIsogonic(darcie)\nDreamy(darcie)\nAttenuated(darcie)\nforall x (Maverick(x) -> Dreamy(x))\nforall x (Dreamy(x) and Foolish(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Dreamy(x) -> Foolish(x))\nforall x (Isogonic(x) -> Attenuated(x))\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> Dreamy(x))\nforall x (Isogonic(x) and Maverick(x) -> Dreamy(x))\n\nnot Maverick(gusty)\n\nnot Maverick(gusty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Barb is flexile. Barb is lentic. Kaitlin is bosnian. Kaitlin is arcane. Kaitlin is astatic. Kaitlin is haphazard. Kaitlin is uniovulate. Kaitlin is lentic. Murial is bosnian. Murial is flexile. Murial is arcane. Murial is astatic. Murial is haphazard. Murial is uniovulate. Murial is lentic. All bosnian things are uniovulate. Smart, arcane things are astatic. All uniovulate things are arcane. If something is haphazard then it is lentic. Green things are uniovulate. If something is haphazard and bosnian then it is uniovulate. Barb is haphazard.", "logic": "\nFlexile(barb)\nLentic(barb)\nBosnian(kaitlin)\nArcane(kaitlin)\nAstatic(kaitlin)\nHaphazard(kaitlin)\nUniovulate(kaitlin)\nLentic(kaitlin)\nBosnian(murial)\nFlexile(murial)\nArcane(murial)\nAstatic(murial)\nHaphazard(murial)\nUniovulate(murial)\nLentic(murial)\nforall x (Bosnian(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) and Arcane(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> Arcane(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Flexile(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) and Bosnian(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\n\nHaphazard(barb)\n\nHaphazard(barb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-813"} {"premises": "Bing is monoicous. Bing is exploded. Bing is excessive. Bing is athirst. Jordain is monoicous. Jordain is colloidal. Jordain is athirst. Jordain is senile. Demetria is exploded. Demetria is monthlong. Demetria is excessive. Coriss is athirst. Rough, monthlong things are colloidal. If something is monoicous and excessive then it is colloidal. Jordain is senile.", "logic": "\nMonoicous(bing)\nExploded(bing)\nExcessive(bing)\nAthirst(bing)\nMonoicous(jordain)\nColloidal(jordain)\nAthirst(jordain)\nSenile(jordain)\nExploded(demetria)\nMonthlong(demetria)\nExcessive(demetria)\nAthirst(coriss)\nforall x (Athirst(x) and Monthlong(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Monoicous(x) and Excessive(x) -> Colloidal(x))\n\nSenile(jordain)\n\ntherefore Senile(jordain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "Amanda is moraceous. Amanda is latest. Amanda is unimproved. Amanda is woody. Hank is moraceous. Hank is maniacal. Hank is woody. Hank is hollywood. Alene is latest. Alene is sublime. Alene is unimproved. Junia is woody. Rough, sublime things are maniacal. If something is moraceous and unimproved then it is maniacal. Alene is not latest.", "logic": "\nMoraceous(amanda)\nLatest(amanda)\nUnimproved(amanda)\nWoody(amanda)\nMoraceous(hank)\nManiacal(hank)\nWoody(hank)\nHollywood(hank)\nLatest(alene)\nSublime(alene)\nUnimproved(alene)\nWoody(junia)\nforall x (Woody(x) and Sublime(x) -> Maniacal(x))\nforall x (Moraceous(x) and Unimproved(x) -> Maniacal(x))\n\nnot Latest(alene)\n\ntherefore Latest(alene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "Dulcia is negative. Dulcia is sinuate. Dulcia is nonviscid. Dulcia is graphic. Gwynne is negative. Gwynne is cockney. Gwynne is graphic. Gwynne is unearned. Audrie is sinuate. Audrie is nidifugous. Audrie is nonviscid. Rand is graphic. Rough, nidifugous things are cockney. If something is negative and nonviscid then it is cockney. Rand is not cockney.", "logic": "\nNegative(dulcia)\nSinuate(dulcia)\nNonviscid(dulcia)\nGraphic(dulcia)\nNegative(gwynne)\nCockney(gwynne)\nGraphic(gwynne)\nUnearned(gwynne)\nSinuate(audrie)\nNidifugous(audrie)\nNonviscid(audrie)\nGraphic(rand)\nforall x (Graphic(x) and Nidifugous(x) -> Cockney(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Cockney(x))\n\nnot Cockney(rand)\n\nforall x (Graphic(x) and Nidifugous(x) -> Cockney(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "Hannis is fortieth. Hannis is crotchety. Hannis is ossified. Hannis is truthful. Allyce is fortieth. Allyce is rimeless. Allyce is truthful. Allyce is discharged. Tann is crotchety. Tann is unlike. Tann is ossified. Maire is truthful. Rough, unlike things are rimeless. If something is fortieth and ossified then it is rimeless. Maire is ossified.", "logic": "\nFortieth(hannis)\nCrotchety(hannis)\nOssified(hannis)\nTruthful(hannis)\nFortieth(allyce)\nRimeless(allyce)\nTruthful(allyce)\nDischarged(allyce)\nCrotchety(tann)\nUnlike(tann)\nOssified(tann)\nTruthful(maire)\nforall x (Truthful(x) and Unlike(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Fortieth(x) and Ossified(x) -> Rimeless(x))\n\nOssified(maire)\n\nOssified(maire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "The lotta emulate the ellette. The lotta is not handled. The lotta is gelatinous. The lotta effuse the ellette. The lotta does not like the sela. The lotta roleplay the ellette. The lotta roleplay the sela. The ellette emulate the sela. The ellette is handled. The sela does not like the lotta. If the ellette is ebony and the ellette emulate the sela then the ellette roleplay the lotta. If the lotta roleplay the sela and the lotta emulate the sela then the sela is ebony. If the lotta is ruffianly and the lotta roleplay the sela then the sela emulate the lotta. If something effuse the lotta and it does not like the sela then the sela effuse the ellette. If something is ebony then it does not like the ellette. If something emulate the ellette then it emulate the sela. Big things are not gelatinous. If something emulate the ellette and it is not stealthy then it roleplay the ellette. The lotta does not like the sela.", "logic": "\nEmulate(lotta, ellette)\nnot Handled(lotta)\nGelatinous(lotta)\nEffuse(lotta, ellette)\nnot Effuse(lotta, sela)\nRoleplay(lotta, ellette)\nRoleplay(lotta, sela)\nEmulate(ellette, sela)\nHandled(ellette)\nnot Effuse(sela, lotta)\nEbony(ellette) and Emulate(ellette, sela) -> Roleplay(ellette, lotta)\nRoleplay(lotta, sela) and Emulate(lotta, sela) -> Ebony(sela)\nRuffianly(lotta) and Roleplay(lotta, sela) -> Emulate(sela, lotta)\nforall x (Effuse(x, lotta) and not Effuse(x, sela) -> Effuse(sela, ellette))\nforall x (Ebony(x) -> not Effuse(x, ellette))\nforall x (Emulate(x, ellette) -> Emulate(x, sela))\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) -> not Gelatinous(x))\nforall x (Emulate(x, ellette) and not Stealthy(x) -> Roleplay(x, ellette))\n\nnot Effuse(lotta, sela)\n\ntherefore not Effuse(lotta, sela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The noreen palisade the stephen. The noreen is not samoan. The noreen is invidious. The noreen peculate the stephen. The noreen does not like the robinette. The noreen trawl the stephen. The noreen trawl the robinette. The stephen palisade the robinette. The stephen is samoan. The robinette does not like the noreen. If the stephen is streaked and the stephen palisade the robinette then the stephen trawl the noreen. If the noreen trawl the robinette and the noreen palisade the robinette then the robinette is streaked. If the noreen is tested and the noreen trawl the robinette then the robinette palisade the noreen. If something peculate the noreen and it does not like the robinette then the robinette peculate the stephen. If something is streaked then it does not like the stephen. If something palisade the stephen then it palisade the robinette. Big things are not invidious. If something palisade the stephen and it is not daunted then it trawl the stephen. The stephen is not samoan.", "logic": "\nPalisade(noreen, stephen)\nnot Samoan(noreen)\nInvidious(noreen)\nPeculate(noreen, stephen)\nnot Peculate(noreen, robinette)\nTrawl(noreen, stephen)\nTrawl(noreen, robinette)\nPalisade(stephen, robinette)\nSamoan(stephen)\nnot Peculate(robinette, noreen)\nStreaked(stephen) and Palisade(stephen, robinette) -> Trawl(stephen, noreen)\nTrawl(noreen, robinette) and Palisade(noreen, robinette) -> Streaked(robinette)\nTested(noreen) and Trawl(noreen, robinette) -> Palisade(robinette, noreen)\nforall x (Peculate(x, noreen) and not Peculate(x, robinette) -> Peculate(robinette, stephen))\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> not Peculate(x, stephen))\nforall x (Palisade(x, stephen) -> Palisade(x, robinette))\nforall x (Tested(x) -> not Invidious(x))\nforall x (Palisade(x, stephen) and not Daunted(x) -> Trawl(x, stephen))\n\nnot Samoan(stephen)\n\ntherefore Samoan(stephen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The dugan skreak the kailey. The dugan is not corbelled. The dugan is ensuant. The dugan immunize the kailey. The dugan does not like the violet. The dugan gradate the kailey. The dugan gradate the violet. The kailey skreak the violet. The kailey is corbelled. The violet does not like the dugan. If the kailey is cadaverous and the kailey skreak the violet then the kailey gradate the dugan. If the dugan gradate the violet and the dugan skreak the violet then the violet is cadaverous. If the dugan is plucked and the dugan gradate the violet then the violet skreak the dugan. If something immunize the dugan and it does not like the violet then the violet immunize the kailey. If something is cadaverous then it does not like the kailey. If something skreak the kailey then it skreak the violet. Big things are not ensuant. If something skreak the kailey and it is not conelike then it gradate the kailey. The dugan skreak the violet.", "logic": "\nSkreak(dugan, kailey)\nnot Corbelled(dugan)\nEnsuant(dugan)\nImmunize(dugan, kailey)\nnot Immunize(dugan, violet)\nGradate(dugan, kailey)\nGradate(dugan, violet)\nSkreak(kailey, violet)\nCorbelled(kailey)\nnot Immunize(violet, dugan)\nCadaverous(kailey) and Skreak(kailey, violet) -> Gradate(kailey, dugan)\nGradate(dugan, violet) and Skreak(dugan, violet) -> Cadaverous(violet)\nPlucked(dugan) and Gradate(dugan, violet) -> Skreak(violet, dugan)\nforall x (Immunize(x, dugan) and not Immunize(x, violet) -> Immunize(violet, kailey))\nforall x (Cadaverous(x) -> not Immunize(x, kailey))\nforall x (Skreak(x, kailey) -> Skreak(x, violet))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> not Ensuant(x))\nforall x (Skreak(x, kailey) and not Conelike(x) -> Gradate(x, kailey))\n\nSkreak(dugan, violet)\n\nSkreak(dugan, kailey) and forall x (Skreak(x, kailey) -> Skreak(x, violet)) -> therefore Skreak(dugan, violet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The daisie interject the jany. The daisie is not unwounded. The daisie is mediated. The daisie damp the jany. The daisie does not like the nannie. The daisie burgeon the jany. The daisie burgeon the nannie. The jany interject the nannie. The jany is unwounded. The nannie does not like the daisie. If the jany is blatant and the jany interject the nannie then the jany burgeon the daisie. If the daisie burgeon the nannie and the daisie interject the nannie then the nannie is blatant. If the daisie is thronged and the daisie burgeon the nannie then the nannie interject the daisie. If something damp the daisie and it does not like the nannie then the nannie damp the jany. If something is blatant then it does not like the jany. If something interject the jany then it interject the nannie. Big things are not mediated. If something interject the jany and it is not coccygeal then it burgeon the jany. The daisie does not chase the nannie.", "logic": "\nInterject(daisie, jany)\nnot Unwounded(daisie)\nMediated(daisie)\nDamp(daisie, jany)\nnot Damp(daisie, nannie)\nBurgeon(daisie, jany)\nBurgeon(daisie, nannie)\nInterject(jany, nannie)\nUnwounded(jany)\nnot Damp(nannie, daisie)\nBlatant(jany) and Interject(jany, nannie) -> Burgeon(jany, daisie)\nBurgeon(daisie, nannie) and Interject(daisie, nannie) -> Blatant(nannie)\nThronged(daisie) and Burgeon(daisie, nannie) -> Interject(nannie, daisie)\nforall x (Damp(x, daisie) and not Damp(x, nannie) -> Damp(nannie, jany))\nforall x (Blatant(x) -> not Damp(x, jany))\nforall x (Interject(x, jany) -> Interject(x, nannie))\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> not Mediated(x))\nforall x (Interject(x, jany) and not Coccygeal(x) -> Burgeon(x, jany))\n\nnot Interject(daisie, nannie)\n\nInterject(daisie, jany) and forall x (Interject(x, jany) -> Interject(x, nannie)) -> therefore Interject(daisie, nannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The mallory disable the slade. The mallory is not anatomical. The mallory is unwomanly. The mallory bemire the slade. The mallory does not like the florette. The mallory overwinter the slade. The mallory overwinter the florette. The slade disable the florette. The slade is anatomical. The florette does not like the mallory. If the slade is outlined and the slade disable the florette then the slade overwinter the mallory. If the mallory overwinter the florette and the mallory disable the florette then the florette is outlined. If the mallory is weakening and the mallory overwinter the florette then the florette disable the mallory. If something bemire the mallory and it does not like the florette then the florette bemire the slade. If something is outlined then it does not like the slade. If something disable the slade then it disable the florette. Big things are not unwomanly. If something disable the slade and it is not utility then it overwinter the slade. The florette is outlined.", "logic": "\nDisable(mallory, slade)\nnot Anatomical(mallory)\nUnwomanly(mallory)\nBemire(mallory, slade)\nnot Bemire(mallory, florette)\nOverwinter(mallory, slade)\nOverwinter(mallory, florette)\nDisable(slade, florette)\nAnatomical(slade)\nnot Bemire(florette, mallory)\nOutlined(slade) and Disable(slade, florette) -> Overwinter(slade, mallory)\nOverwinter(mallory, florette) and Disable(mallory, florette) -> Outlined(florette)\nWeakening(mallory) and Overwinter(mallory, florette) -> Disable(florette, mallory)\nforall x (Bemire(x, mallory) and not Bemire(x, florette) -> Bemire(florette, slade))\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> not Bemire(x, slade))\nforall x (Disable(x, slade) -> Disable(x, florette))\nforall x (Weakening(x) -> not Unwomanly(x))\nforall x (Disable(x, slade) and not Utility(x) -> Overwinter(x, slade))\n\nOutlined(florette)\n\nDisable(mallory, slade) and forall x (Disable(x, slade) -> Disable(x, florette)) -> therefore Disable(mallory, florette) Overwinter(mallory, florette) and Disable(mallory, florette) and Overwinter(mallory, florette) and Disable(mallory, florette) -> Outlined(florette) -> therefore Outlined(florette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The janice reiterate the kam. The janice is not bats. The janice is repetitive. The janice banish the kam. The janice does not like the mort. The janice isolate the kam. The janice isolate the mort. The kam reiterate the mort. The kam is bats. The mort does not like the janice. If the kam is opened and the kam reiterate the mort then the kam isolate the janice. If the janice isolate the mort and the janice reiterate the mort then the mort is opened. If the janice is narrowing and the janice isolate the mort then the mort reiterate the janice. If something banish the janice and it does not like the mort then the mort banish the kam. If something is opened then it does not like the kam. If something reiterate the kam then it reiterate the mort. Big things are not repetitive. If something reiterate the kam and it is not gamy then it isolate the kam. The mort is not opened.", "logic": "\nReiterate(janice, kam)\nnot Bats(janice)\nRepetitive(janice)\nBanish(janice, kam)\nnot Banish(janice, mort)\nIsolate(janice, kam)\nIsolate(janice, mort)\nReiterate(kam, mort)\nBats(kam)\nnot Banish(mort, janice)\nOpened(kam) and Reiterate(kam, mort) -> Isolate(kam, janice)\nIsolate(janice, mort) and Reiterate(janice, mort) -> Opened(mort)\nNarrowing(janice) and Isolate(janice, mort) -> Reiterate(mort, janice)\nforall x (Banish(x, janice) and not Banish(x, mort) -> Banish(mort, kam))\nforall x (Opened(x) -> not Banish(x, kam))\nforall x (Reiterate(x, kam) -> Reiterate(x, mort))\nforall x (Narrowing(x) -> not Repetitive(x))\nforall x (Reiterate(x, kam) and not Gamy(x) -> Isolate(x, kam))\n\nnot Opened(mort)\n\nReiterate(janice, kam) and forall x (Reiterate(x, kam) -> Reiterate(x, mort)) -> therefore Reiterate(janice, mort) Isolate(janice, mort) and Reiterate(janice, mort) and Isolate(janice, mort) and Reiterate(janice, mort) -> Opened(mort) -> therefore Opened(mort)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The remus assent the selinda. The remus is not unrigged. The remus is overdue. The remus modernise the selinda. The remus does not like the melva. The remus program the selinda. The remus program the melva. The selinda assent the melva. The selinda is unrigged. The melva does not like the remus. If the selinda is possible and the selinda assent the melva then the selinda program the remus. If the remus program the melva and the remus assent the melva then the melva is possible. If the remus is assistive and the remus program the melva then the melva assent the remus. If something modernise the remus and it does not like the melva then the melva modernise the selinda. If something is possible then it does not like the selinda. If something assent the selinda then it assent the melva. Big things are not overdue. If something assent the selinda and it is not plethoric then it program the selinda. The melva does not like the selinda.", "logic": "\nAssent(remus, selinda)\nnot Unrigged(remus)\nOverdue(remus)\nModernise(remus, selinda)\nnot Modernise(remus, melva)\nProgram(remus, selinda)\nProgram(remus, melva)\nAssent(selinda, melva)\nUnrigged(selinda)\nnot Modernise(melva, remus)\nPossible(selinda) and Assent(selinda, melva) -> Program(selinda, remus)\nProgram(remus, melva) and Assent(remus, melva) -> Possible(melva)\nAssistive(remus) and Program(remus, melva) -> Assent(melva, remus)\nforall x (Modernise(x, remus) and not Modernise(x, melva) -> Modernise(melva, selinda))\nforall x (Possible(x) -> not Modernise(x, selinda))\nforall x (Assent(x, selinda) -> Assent(x, melva))\nforall x (Assistive(x) -> not Overdue(x))\nforall x (Assent(x, selinda) and not Plethoric(x) -> Program(x, selinda))\n\nnot Modernise(melva, selinda)\n\nAssent(remus, selinda) and forall x (Assent(x, selinda) -> Assent(x, melva)) -> therefore Assent(remus, melva) Program(remus, melva) and Assent(remus, melva) and Program(remus, melva) and Assent(remus, melva) -> Possible(melva) -> therefore Possible(melva) Possible(melva) and forall x (Possible(x) -> not Modernise(x, selinda)) -> therefore not Modernise(melva, selinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The edwina contest the cindee. The edwina is not contrite. The edwina is unexcelled. The edwina slurp the cindee. The edwina does not like the hailee. The edwina state the cindee. The edwina state the hailee. The cindee contest the hailee. The cindee is contrite. The hailee does not like the edwina. If the cindee is upscale and the cindee contest the hailee then the cindee state the edwina. If the edwina state the hailee and the edwina contest the hailee then the hailee is upscale. If the edwina is listed and the edwina state the hailee then the hailee contest the edwina. If something slurp the edwina and it does not like the hailee then the hailee slurp the cindee. If something is upscale then it does not like the cindee. If something contest the cindee then it contest the hailee. Big things are not unexcelled. If something contest the cindee and it is not paradisaic then it state the cindee. The hailee slurp the cindee.", "logic": "\nContest(edwina, cindee)\nnot Contrite(edwina)\nUnexcelled(edwina)\nSlurp(edwina, cindee)\nnot Slurp(edwina, hailee)\nState(edwina, cindee)\nState(edwina, hailee)\nContest(cindee, hailee)\nContrite(cindee)\nnot Slurp(hailee, edwina)\nUpscale(cindee) and Contest(cindee, hailee) -> State(cindee, edwina)\nState(edwina, hailee) and Contest(edwina, hailee) -> Upscale(hailee)\nListed(edwina) and State(edwina, hailee) -> Contest(hailee, edwina)\nforall x (Slurp(x, edwina) and not Slurp(x, hailee) -> Slurp(hailee, cindee))\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> not Slurp(x, cindee))\nforall x (Contest(x, cindee) -> Contest(x, hailee))\nforall x (Listed(x) -> not Unexcelled(x))\nforall x (Contest(x, cindee) and not Paradisaic(x) -> State(x, cindee))\n\nSlurp(hailee, cindee)\n\nContest(edwina, cindee) and forall x (Contest(x, cindee) -> Contest(x, hailee)) -> therefore Contest(edwina, hailee) State(edwina, hailee) and Contest(edwina, hailee) and State(edwina, hailee) and Contest(edwina, hailee) -> Upscale(hailee) -> therefore Upscale(hailee) Upscale(hailee) and forall x (Upscale(x) -> not Slurp(x, cindee)) -> therefore not Slurp(hailee, cindee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The harli plant the bharat. The harli is not ephesian. The harli is coequal. The harli caper the bharat. The harli does not like the nanni. The harli calve the bharat. The harli calve the nanni. The bharat plant the nanni. The bharat is ephesian. The nanni does not like the harli. If the bharat is lengthwise and the bharat plant the nanni then the bharat calve the harli. If the harli calve the nanni and the harli plant the nanni then the nanni is lengthwise. If the harli is spacy and the harli calve the nanni then the nanni plant the harli. If something caper the harli and it does not like the nanni then the nanni caper the bharat. If something is lengthwise then it does not like the bharat. If something plant the bharat then it plant the nanni. Big things are not coequal. If something plant the bharat and it is not developing then it calve the bharat. The nanni does not see the bharat.", "logic": "\nPlant(harli, bharat)\nnot Ephesian(harli)\nCoequal(harli)\nCaper(harli, bharat)\nnot Caper(harli, nanni)\nCalve(harli, bharat)\nCalve(harli, nanni)\nPlant(bharat, nanni)\nEphesian(bharat)\nnot Caper(nanni, harli)\nLengthwise(bharat) and Plant(bharat, nanni) -> Calve(bharat, harli)\nCalve(harli, nanni) and Plant(harli, nanni) -> Lengthwise(nanni)\nSpacy(harli) and Calve(harli, nanni) -> Plant(nanni, harli)\nforall x (Caper(x, harli) and not Caper(x, nanni) -> Caper(nanni, bharat))\nforall x (Lengthwise(x) -> not Caper(x, bharat))\nforall x (Plant(x, bharat) -> Plant(x, nanni))\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> not Coequal(x))\nforall x (Plant(x, bharat) and not Developing(x) -> Calve(x, bharat))\n\nnot Calve(nanni, bharat)\n\nforall x (Plant(x, bharat) and not Developing(x) -> Calve(x, bharat)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The adara invalid the catherina. The adara is not baseless. The adara is oceanic. The adara groin the catherina. The adara does not like the yancy. The adara aviate the catherina. The adara aviate the yancy. The catherina invalid the yancy. The catherina is baseless. The yancy does not like the adara. If the catherina is endocrinal and the catherina invalid the yancy then the catherina aviate the adara. If the adara aviate the yancy and the adara invalid the yancy then the yancy is endocrinal. If the adara is shivery and the adara aviate the yancy then the yancy invalid the adara. If something groin the adara and it does not like the yancy then the yancy groin the catherina. If something is endocrinal then it does not like the catherina. If something invalid the catherina then it invalid the yancy. Big things are not oceanic. If something invalid the catherina and it is not boughed then it aviate the catherina. The catherina aviate the catherina.", "logic": "\nInvalid(adara, catherina)\nnot Baseless(adara)\nOceanic(adara)\nGroin(adara, catherina)\nnot Groin(adara, yancy)\nAviate(adara, catherina)\nAviate(adara, yancy)\nInvalid(catherina, yancy)\nBaseless(catherina)\nnot Groin(yancy, adara)\nEndocrinal(catherina) and Invalid(catherina, yancy) -> Aviate(catherina, adara)\nAviate(adara, yancy) and Invalid(adara, yancy) -> Endocrinal(yancy)\nShivery(adara) and Aviate(adara, yancy) -> Invalid(yancy, adara)\nforall x (Groin(x, adara) and not Groin(x, yancy) -> Groin(yancy, catherina))\nforall x (Endocrinal(x) -> not Groin(x, catherina))\nforall x (Invalid(x, catherina) -> Invalid(x, yancy))\nforall x (Shivery(x) -> not Oceanic(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x, catherina) and not Boughed(x) -> Aviate(x, catherina))\n\nAviate(catherina, catherina)\n\nforall x (Invalid(x, catherina) and not Boughed(x) -> Aviate(x, catherina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The rosalind misally the kendal. The rosalind is not pinstriped. The rosalind is nourishing. The rosalind regularise the kendal. The rosalind does not like the morissa. The rosalind pattern the kendal. The rosalind pattern the morissa. The kendal misally the morissa. The kendal is pinstriped. The morissa does not like the rosalind. If the kendal is uncoerced and the kendal misally the morissa then the kendal pattern the rosalind. If the rosalind pattern the morissa and the rosalind misally the morissa then the morissa is uncoerced. If the rosalind is helminthic and the rosalind pattern the morissa then the morissa misally the rosalind. If something regularise the rosalind and it does not like the morissa then the morissa regularise the kendal. If something is uncoerced then it does not like the kendal. If something misally the kendal then it misally the morissa. Big things are not nourishing. If something misally the kendal and it is not motivated then it pattern the kendal. The morissa does not chase the morissa.", "logic": "\nMisally(rosalind, kendal)\nnot Pinstriped(rosalind)\nNourishing(rosalind)\nRegularise(rosalind, kendal)\nnot Regularise(rosalind, morissa)\nPattern(rosalind, kendal)\nPattern(rosalind, morissa)\nMisally(kendal, morissa)\nPinstriped(kendal)\nnot Regularise(morissa, rosalind)\nUncoerced(kendal) and Misally(kendal, morissa) -> Pattern(kendal, rosalind)\nPattern(rosalind, morissa) and Misally(rosalind, morissa) -> Uncoerced(morissa)\nHelminthic(rosalind) and Pattern(rosalind, morissa) -> Misally(morissa, rosalind)\nforall x (Regularise(x, rosalind) and not Regularise(x, morissa) -> Regularise(morissa, kendal))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> not Regularise(x, kendal))\nforall x (Misally(x, kendal) -> Misally(x, morissa))\nforall x (Helminthic(x) -> not Nourishing(x))\nforall x (Misally(x, kendal) and not Motivated(x) -> Pattern(x, kendal))\n\nnot Misally(morissa, morissa)\n\nforall x (Misally(x, kendal) -> Misally(x, morissa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The carolin resinate the jory. The carolin is not polyoicous. The carolin is politic. The carolin blinker the jory. The carolin does not like the richardo. The carolin hobnob the jory. The carolin hobnob the richardo. The jory resinate the richardo. The jory is polyoicous. The richardo does not like the carolin. If the jory is caudal and the jory resinate the richardo then the jory hobnob the carolin. If the carolin hobnob the richardo and the carolin resinate the richardo then the richardo is caudal. If the carolin is barbecued and the carolin hobnob the richardo then the richardo resinate the carolin. If something blinker the carolin and it does not like the richardo then the richardo blinker the jory. If something is caudal then it does not like the jory. If something resinate the jory then it resinate the richardo. Big things are not politic. If something resinate the jory and it is not emblematic then it hobnob the jory. The jory hobnob the carolin.", "logic": "\nResinate(carolin, jory)\nnot Polyoicous(carolin)\nPolitic(carolin)\nBlinker(carolin, jory)\nnot Blinker(carolin, richardo)\nHobnob(carolin, jory)\nHobnob(carolin, richardo)\nResinate(jory, richardo)\nPolyoicous(jory)\nnot Blinker(richardo, carolin)\nCaudal(jory) and Resinate(jory, richardo) -> Hobnob(jory, carolin)\nHobnob(carolin, richardo) and Resinate(carolin, richardo) -> Caudal(richardo)\nBarbecued(carolin) and Hobnob(carolin, richardo) -> Resinate(richardo, carolin)\nforall x (Blinker(x, carolin) and not Blinker(x, richardo) -> Blinker(richardo, jory))\nforall x (Caudal(x) -> not Blinker(x, jory))\nforall x (Resinate(x, jory) -> Resinate(x, richardo))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) -> not Politic(x))\nforall x (Resinate(x, jory) and not Emblematic(x) -> Hobnob(x, jory))\n\nHobnob(jory, carolin)\n\nCaudal(jory) and Resinate(jory, richardo) -> Hobnob(jory, carolin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The clinten argue the sheridan. The clinten is not exploited. The clinten is ruttish. The clinten fundraise the sheridan. The clinten does not like the ichabod. The clinten divest the sheridan. The clinten divest the ichabod. The sheridan argue the ichabod. The sheridan is exploited. The ichabod does not like the clinten. If the sheridan is homespun and the sheridan argue the ichabod then the sheridan divest the clinten. If the clinten divest the ichabod and the clinten argue the ichabod then the ichabod is homespun. If the clinten is tahitian and the clinten divest the ichabod then the ichabod argue the clinten. If something fundraise the clinten and it does not like the ichabod then the ichabod fundraise the sheridan. If something is homespun then it does not like the sheridan. If something argue the sheridan then it argue the ichabod. Big things are not ruttish. If something argue the sheridan and it is not advised then it divest the sheridan. The ichabod is not exploited.", "logic": "\nArgue(clinten, sheridan)\nnot Exploited(clinten)\nRuttish(clinten)\nFundraise(clinten, sheridan)\nnot Fundraise(clinten, ichabod)\nDivest(clinten, sheridan)\nDivest(clinten, ichabod)\nArgue(sheridan, ichabod)\nExploited(sheridan)\nnot Fundraise(ichabod, clinten)\nHomespun(sheridan) and Argue(sheridan, ichabod) -> Divest(sheridan, clinten)\nDivest(clinten, ichabod) and Argue(clinten, ichabod) -> Homespun(ichabod)\nTahitian(clinten) and Divest(clinten, ichabod) -> Argue(ichabod, clinten)\nforall x (Fundraise(x, clinten) and not Fundraise(x, ichabod) -> Fundraise(ichabod, sheridan))\nforall x (Homespun(x) -> not Fundraise(x, sheridan))\nforall x (Argue(x, sheridan) -> Argue(x, ichabod))\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> not Ruttish(x))\nforall x (Argue(x, sheridan) and not Advised(x) -> Divest(x, sheridan))\n\nnot Exploited(ichabod)\n\nnot Exploited(ichabod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The rollin crate the marsiella. The rollin is not noiseless. The rollin is boastful. The rollin constrain the marsiella. The rollin does not like the kelsey. The rollin chicane the marsiella. The rollin chicane the kelsey. The marsiella crate the kelsey. The marsiella is noiseless. The kelsey does not like the rollin. If the marsiella is undecided and the marsiella crate the kelsey then the marsiella chicane the rollin. If the rollin chicane the kelsey and the rollin crate the kelsey then the kelsey is undecided. If the rollin is fulfilled and the rollin chicane the kelsey then the kelsey crate the rollin. If something constrain the rollin and it does not like the kelsey then the kelsey constrain the marsiella. If something is undecided then it does not like the marsiella. If something crate the marsiella then it crate the kelsey. Big things are not boastful. If something crate the marsiella and it is not siliceous then it chicane the marsiella. The marsiella is siliceous.", "logic": "\nCrate(rollin, marsiella)\nnot Noiseless(rollin)\nBoastful(rollin)\nConstrain(rollin, marsiella)\nnot Constrain(rollin, kelsey)\nChicane(rollin, marsiella)\nChicane(rollin, kelsey)\nCrate(marsiella, kelsey)\nNoiseless(marsiella)\nnot Constrain(kelsey, rollin)\nUndecided(marsiella) and Crate(marsiella, kelsey) -> Chicane(marsiella, rollin)\nChicane(rollin, kelsey) and Crate(rollin, kelsey) -> Undecided(kelsey)\nFulfilled(rollin) and Chicane(rollin, kelsey) -> Crate(kelsey, rollin)\nforall x (Constrain(x, rollin) and not Constrain(x, kelsey) -> Constrain(kelsey, marsiella))\nforall x (Undecided(x) -> not Constrain(x, marsiella))\nforall x (Crate(x, marsiella) -> Crate(x, kelsey))\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) -> not Boastful(x))\nforall x (Crate(x, marsiella) and not Siliceous(x) -> Chicane(x, marsiella))\n\nSiliceous(marsiella)\n\nSiliceous(marsiella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The brendan boondoggle the haydon. The brendan is not vesical. The brendan is aggravated. The brendan clean the haydon. The brendan does not like the robbert. The brendan maledict the haydon. The brendan maledict the robbert. The haydon boondoggle the robbert. The haydon is vesical. The robbert does not like the brendan. If the haydon is dizygotic and the haydon boondoggle the robbert then the haydon maledict the brendan. If the brendan maledict the robbert and the brendan boondoggle the robbert then the robbert is dizygotic. If the brendan is unworried and the brendan maledict the robbert then the robbert boondoggle the brendan. If something clean the brendan and it does not like the robbert then the robbert clean the haydon. If something is dizygotic then it does not like the haydon. If something boondoggle the haydon then it boondoggle the robbert. Big things are not aggravated. If something boondoggle the haydon and it is not plugged then it maledict the haydon. The haydon does not chase the brendan.", "logic": "\nBoondoggle(brendan, haydon)\nnot Vesical(brendan)\nAggravated(brendan)\nClean(brendan, haydon)\nnot Clean(brendan, robbert)\nMaledict(brendan, haydon)\nMaledict(brendan, robbert)\nBoondoggle(haydon, robbert)\nVesical(haydon)\nnot Clean(robbert, brendan)\nDizygotic(haydon) and Boondoggle(haydon, robbert) -> Maledict(haydon, brendan)\nMaledict(brendan, robbert) and Boondoggle(brendan, robbert) -> Dizygotic(robbert)\nUnworried(brendan) and Maledict(brendan, robbert) -> Boondoggle(robbert, brendan)\nforall x (Clean(x, brendan) and not Clean(x, robbert) -> Clean(robbert, haydon))\nforall x (Dizygotic(x) -> not Clean(x, haydon))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, haydon) -> Boondoggle(x, robbert))\nforall x (Unworried(x) -> not Aggravated(x))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, haydon) and not Plugged(x) -> Maledict(x, haydon))\n\nnot Boondoggle(haydon, brendan)\n\nnot Boondoggle(haydon, brendan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "The danice step the rem. The danice is not psychotic. The danice is sexy. The danice eulogise the rem. The danice does not like the con. The danice stabilise the rem. The danice stabilise the con. The rem step the con. The rem is psychotic. The con does not like the danice. If the rem is stained and the rem step the con then the rem stabilise the danice. If the danice stabilise the con and the danice step the con then the con is stained. If the danice is calycular and the danice stabilise the con then the con step the danice. If something eulogise the danice and it does not like the con then the con eulogise the rem. If something is stained then it does not like the rem. If something step the rem then it step the con. Big things are not sexy. If something step the rem and it is not bonkers then it stabilise the rem. The danice stabilise the danice.", "logic": "\nStep(danice, rem)\nnot Psychotic(danice)\nSexy(danice)\nEulogise(danice, rem)\nnot Eulogise(danice, con)\nStabilise(danice, rem)\nStabilise(danice, con)\nStep(rem, con)\nPsychotic(rem)\nnot Eulogise(con, danice)\nStained(rem) and Step(rem, con) -> Stabilise(rem, danice)\nStabilise(danice, con) and Step(danice, con) -> Stained(con)\nCalycular(danice) and Stabilise(danice, con) -> Step(con, danice)\nforall x (Eulogise(x, danice) and not Eulogise(x, con) -> Eulogise(con, rem))\nforall x (Stained(x) -> not Eulogise(x, rem))\nforall x (Step(x, rem) -> Step(x, con))\nforall x (Calycular(x) -> not Sexy(x))\nforall x (Step(x, rem) and not Bonkers(x) -> Stabilise(x, rem))\n\nStabilise(danice, danice)\n\nStabilise(danice, danice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-506"} {"premises": "Ula is unfeasible. Ula is hopeful. Max is maxi. Max is capitular. Max is moving. Max is optative. Max is hopeful. Max is nonlinear. Adore is maxi. Adore is capitular. Adore is moving. Adore is unfeasible. If someone is hopeful then they are maxi. All capitular people are optative. If someone is maxi then they are capitular. Max is optative.", "logic": "\nUnfeasible(ula)\nHopeful(ula)\nMaxi(max)\nCapitular(max)\nMoving(max)\nOptative(max)\nHopeful(max)\nNonlinear(max)\nMaxi(adore)\nCapitular(adore)\nMoving(adore)\nUnfeasible(adore)\nforall x (Hopeful(x) -> Maxi(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Maxi(x) -> Capitular(x))\n\nOptative(max)\n\ntherefore Optative(max)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Jed is uncertain. Jed is discovered. Tiertza is clubbish. Tiertza is bereaved. Tiertza is turbaned. Tiertza is plundering. Tiertza is discovered. Tiertza is lengthwise. Rica is clubbish. Rica is bereaved. Rica is turbaned. Rica is uncertain. If someone is discovered then they are clubbish. All bereaved people are plundering. If someone is clubbish then they are bereaved. Rica is not bereaved.", "logic": "\nUncertain(jed)\nDiscovered(jed)\nClubbish(tiertza)\nBereaved(tiertza)\nTurbaned(tiertza)\nPlundering(tiertza)\nDiscovered(tiertza)\nLengthwise(tiertza)\nClubbish(rica)\nBereaved(rica)\nTurbaned(rica)\nUncertain(rica)\nforall x (Discovered(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) -> Plundering(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Bereaved(x))\n\nnot Bereaved(rica)\n\ntherefore Bereaved(rica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Netta is harmonic. Netta is placative. Thurstan is spaced. Thurstan is polyglot. Thurstan is kinky. Thurstan is sphingine. Thurstan is placative. Thurstan is unifying. Aguste is spaced. Aguste is polyglot. Aguste is kinky. Aguste is harmonic. If someone is placative then they are spaced. All polyglot people are sphingine. If someone is spaced then they are polyglot. Netta is spaced.", "logic": "\nHarmonic(netta)\nPlacative(netta)\nSpaced(thurstan)\nPolyglot(thurstan)\nKinky(thurstan)\nSphingine(thurstan)\nPlacative(thurstan)\nUnifying(thurstan)\nSpaced(aguste)\nPolyglot(aguste)\nKinky(aguste)\nHarmonic(aguste)\nforall x (Placative(x) -> Spaced(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) -> Sphingine(x))\nforall x (Spaced(x) -> Polyglot(x))\n\nSpaced(netta)\n\nPlacative(netta) and forall x (Placative(x) -> Spaced(x)) -> therefore Spaced(netta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Laila is yankee. Laila is urgent. Teryl is oddish. Teryl is monegasque. Teryl is sneezy. Teryl is puerperal. Teryl is urgent. Teryl is shaping. Osbert is oddish. Osbert is monegasque. Osbert is sneezy. Osbert is yankee. If someone is urgent then they are oddish. All monegasque people are puerperal. If someone is oddish then they are monegasque. Osbert is not puerperal.", "logic": "\nYankee(laila)\nUrgent(laila)\nOddish(teryl)\nMonegasque(teryl)\nSneezy(teryl)\nPuerperal(teryl)\nUrgent(teryl)\nShaping(teryl)\nOddish(osbert)\nMonegasque(osbert)\nSneezy(osbert)\nYankee(osbert)\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Monegasque(x) -> Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Monegasque(x))\n\nnot Puerperal(osbert)\n\nMonegasque(osbert) and forall x (Monegasque(x) -> Puerperal(x)) -> therefore Puerperal(osbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Jack is grand. Jack is single. Charin is oily. Charin is celtic. Charin is perforate. Charin is gauntleted. Charin is single. Charin is sooty. Cassandry is oily. Cassandry is celtic. Cassandry is perforate. Cassandry is grand. If someone is single then they are oily. All celtic people are gauntleted. If someone is oily then they are celtic. Jack is celtic.", "logic": "\nGrand(jack)\nSingle(jack)\nOily(charin)\nCeltic(charin)\nPerforate(charin)\nGauntleted(charin)\nSingle(charin)\nSooty(charin)\nOily(cassandry)\nCeltic(cassandry)\nPerforate(cassandry)\nGrand(cassandry)\nforall x (Single(x) -> Oily(x))\nforall x (Celtic(x) -> Gauntleted(x))\nforall x (Oily(x) -> Celtic(x))\n\nCeltic(jack)\n\nSingle(jack) and forall x (Single(x) -> Oily(x)) -> therefore Oily(jack) Oily(jack) and forall x (Oily(x) -> Celtic(x)) -> therefore Celtic(jack)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Alecia is frilly. Alecia is educative. Lynda is unthankful. Lynda is frozen. Lynda is branchless. Lynda is accusatory. Lynda is educative. Lynda is diffusive. Mallory is unthankful. Mallory is frozen. Mallory is branchless. Mallory is frilly. If someone is educative then they are unthankful. All frozen people are accusatory. If someone is unthankful then they are frozen. Alecia is not frozen.", "logic": "\nFrilly(alecia)\nEducative(alecia)\nUnthankful(lynda)\nFrozen(lynda)\nBranchless(lynda)\nAccusatory(lynda)\nEducative(lynda)\nDiffusive(lynda)\nUnthankful(mallory)\nFrozen(mallory)\nBranchless(mallory)\nFrilly(mallory)\nforall x (Educative(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Frozen(x) -> Accusatory(x))\nforall x (Unthankful(x) -> Frozen(x))\n\nnot Frozen(alecia)\n\nEducative(alecia) and forall x (Educative(x) -> Unthankful(x)) -> therefore Unthankful(alecia) Unthankful(alecia) and forall x (Unthankful(x) -> Frozen(x)) -> therefore Frozen(alecia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Miran is endogenous. Miran is falsetto. Rick is freelance. Rick is vertebrate. Rick is handed. Rick is cheliceral. Rick is falsetto. Rick is untilled. Waldon is freelance. Waldon is vertebrate. Waldon is handed. Waldon is endogenous. If someone is falsetto then they are freelance. All vertebrate people are cheliceral. If someone is freelance then they are vertebrate. Miran is cheliceral.", "logic": "\nEndogenous(miran)\nFalsetto(miran)\nFreelance(rick)\nVertebrate(rick)\nHanded(rick)\nCheliceral(rick)\nFalsetto(rick)\nUntilled(rick)\nFreelance(waldon)\nVertebrate(waldon)\nHanded(waldon)\nEndogenous(waldon)\nforall x (Falsetto(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) -> Cheliceral(x))\nforall x (Freelance(x) -> Vertebrate(x))\n\nCheliceral(miran)\n\nFalsetto(miran) and forall x (Falsetto(x) -> Freelance(x)) -> therefore Freelance(miran) Freelance(miran) and forall x (Freelance(x) -> Vertebrate(x)) -> therefore Vertebrate(miran) Vertebrate(miran) and forall x (Vertebrate(x) -> Cheliceral(x)) -> therefore Cheliceral(miran)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Andree is ireful. Andree is jetting. Aristotle is unholy. Aristotle is posh. Aristotle is healthier. Aristotle is silklike. Aristotle is jetting. Aristotle is involute. Issy is unholy. Issy is posh. Issy is healthier. Issy is ireful. If someone is jetting then they are unholy. All posh people are silklike. If someone is unholy then they are posh. Andree is not silklike.", "logic": "\nIreful(andree)\nJetting(andree)\nUnholy(aristotle)\nPosh(aristotle)\nHealthier(aristotle)\nSilklike(aristotle)\nJetting(aristotle)\nInvolute(aristotle)\nUnholy(issy)\nPosh(issy)\nHealthier(issy)\nIreful(issy)\nforall x (Jetting(x) -> Unholy(x))\nforall x (Posh(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Unholy(x) -> Posh(x))\n\nnot Silklike(andree)\n\nJetting(andree) and forall x (Jetting(x) -> Unholy(x)) -> therefore Unholy(andree) Unholy(andree) and forall x (Unholy(x) -> Posh(x)) -> therefore Posh(andree) Posh(andree) and forall x (Posh(x) -> Silklike(x)) -> therefore Silklike(andree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Doralynn is blinded. Doralynn is petallike. Loree is formalized. Loree is devoid. Loree is painterly. Loree is perfect. Loree is petallike. Loree is recovering. Moss is formalized. Moss is devoid. Moss is painterly. Moss is blinded. If someone is petallike then they are formalized. All devoid people are perfect. If someone is formalized then they are devoid. Doralynn is not recovering.", "logic": "\nBlinded(doralynn)\nPetallike(doralynn)\nFormalized(loree)\nDevoid(loree)\nPainterly(loree)\nPerfect(loree)\nPetallike(loree)\nRecovering(loree)\nFormalized(moss)\nDevoid(moss)\nPainterly(moss)\nBlinded(moss)\nforall x (Petallike(x) -> Formalized(x))\nforall x (Devoid(x) -> Perfect(x))\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> Devoid(x))\n\nnot Recovering(doralynn)\n\nnot Recovering(doralynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Zorana is unsafe. Zorana is confirming. Yevette is assumptive. Yevette is encircling. Yevette is epidemic. Yevette is protruding. Yevette is confirming. Yevette is depressed. Regen is assumptive. Regen is encircling. Regen is epidemic. Regen is unsafe. If someone is confirming then they are assumptive. All encircling people are protruding. If someone is assumptive then they are encircling. Regen is confirming.", "logic": "\nUnsafe(zorana)\nConfirming(zorana)\nAssumptive(yevette)\nEncircling(yevette)\nEpidemic(yevette)\nProtruding(yevette)\nConfirming(yevette)\nDepressed(yevette)\nAssumptive(regen)\nEncircling(regen)\nEpidemic(regen)\nUnsafe(regen)\nforall x (Confirming(x) -> Assumptive(x))\nforall x (Encircling(x) -> Protruding(x))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) -> Encircling(x))\n\nConfirming(regen)\n\nConfirming(regen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Roseanna is tattling. Roseanna is aleutian. Virge is unseeable. Virge is wrought. Virge is unquiet. Virge is palmy. Virge is aleutian. Virge is aetiologic. Adina is unseeable. Adina is wrought. Adina is unquiet. Adina is tattling. If someone is aleutian then they are unseeable. All wrought people are palmy. If someone is unseeable then they are wrought. Roseanna is not unquiet.", "logic": "\nTattling(roseanna)\nAleutian(roseanna)\nUnseeable(virge)\nWrought(virge)\nUnquiet(virge)\nPalmy(virge)\nAleutian(virge)\nAetiologic(virge)\nUnseeable(adina)\nWrought(adina)\nUnquiet(adina)\nTattling(adina)\nforall x (Aleutian(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> Palmy(x))\nforall x (Unseeable(x) -> Wrought(x))\n\nnot Unquiet(roseanna)\n\nnot Unquiet(roseanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "Warren is nonplused. Warren is ptolemaic. Ardeen is tawdry. Ardeen is hungarian. Ardeen is ungrasped. Ardeen is coplanar. Ardeen is ptolemaic. Ardeen is blustery. Georgette is tawdry. Georgette is hungarian. Georgette is ungrasped. Georgette is nonplused. If someone is ptolemaic then they are tawdry. All hungarian people are coplanar. If someone is tawdry then they are hungarian. Ardeen is nonplused.", "logic": "\nNonplused(warren)\nPtolemaic(warren)\nTawdry(ardeen)\nHungarian(ardeen)\nUngrasped(ardeen)\nCoplanar(ardeen)\nPtolemaic(ardeen)\nBlustery(ardeen)\nTawdry(georgette)\nHungarian(georgette)\nUngrasped(georgette)\nNonplused(georgette)\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Tawdry(x))\nforall x (Hungarian(x) -> Coplanar(x))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> Hungarian(x))\n\nNonplused(ardeen)\n\nNonplused(ardeen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-493"} {"premises": "The shane is exogenic. The cami advert the shane. The corby establish the cami. If something establish the shane then the shane establish the cami. If something establish the cami then it is varying. If the cami is ceremonial and the cami is varying then the cami advert the shane. If something is accredited and it speechify the shane then the shane advert the cami. If something advert the shane then it establish the shane. If something speechify the corby then it is accredited. The cami advert the shane.", "logic": "\nExogenic(shane)\nAdvert(cami, shane)\nEstablish(corby, cami)\nforall x (Establish(x, shane) -> Establish(shane, cami))\nforall x (Establish(x, cami) -> Varying(x))\nCeremonial(cami) and Varying(cami) -> Advert(cami, shane)\nforall x (Accredited(x) and Speechify(x, shane) -> Advert(shane, cami))\nforall x (Advert(x, shane) -> Establish(x, shane))\nforall x (Speechify(x, corby) -> Accredited(x))\n\nAdvert(cami, shane)\n\ntherefore Advert(cami, shane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The keri is taurine. The torr tame the keri. The essie forget the torr. If something forget the keri then the keri forget the torr. If something forget the torr then it is springless. If the torr is liverish and the torr is springless then the torr tame the keri. If something is handheld and it accustom the keri then the keri tame the torr. If something tame the keri then it forget the keri. If something accustom the essie then it is handheld. The keri is not taurine.", "logic": "\nTaurine(keri)\nTame(torr, keri)\nForget(essie, torr)\nforall x (Forget(x, keri) -> Forget(keri, torr))\nforall x (Forget(x, torr) -> Springless(x))\nLiverish(torr) and Springless(torr) -> Tame(torr, keri)\nforall x (Handheld(x) and Accustom(x, keri) -> Tame(keri, torr))\nforall x (Tame(x, keri) -> Forget(x, keri))\nforall x (Accustom(x, essie) -> Handheld(x))\n\nnot Taurine(keri)\n\ntherefore Taurine(keri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The augie is erasmian. The barton miscreate the augie. The suki designate the barton. If something designate the augie then the augie designate the barton. If something designate the barton then it is dour. If the barton is unpriestly and the barton is dour then the barton miscreate the augie. If something is obnoxious and it chisel the augie then the augie miscreate the barton. If something miscreate the augie then it designate the augie. If something chisel the suki then it is obnoxious. The barton designate the augie.", "logic": "\nErasmian(augie)\nMiscreate(barton, augie)\nDesignate(suki, barton)\nforall x (Designate(x, augie) -> Designate(augie, barton))\nforall x (Designate(x, barton) -> Dour(x))\nUnpriestly(barton) and Dour(barton) -> Miscreate(barton, augie)\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) and Chisel(x, augie) -> Miscreate(augie, barton))\nforall x (Miscreate(x, augie) -> Designate(x, augie))\nforall x (Chisel(x, suki) -> Obnoxious(x))\n\nDesignate(barton, augie)\n\nMiscreate(barton, augie) and forall x (Miscreate(x, augie) -> Designate(x, augie)) -> therefore Designate(barton, augie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The barbee is rocky. The samara peach the barbee. The nat alligator the samara. If something alligator the barbee then the barbee alligator the samara. If something alligator the samara then it is stinking. If the samara is upbound and the samara is stinking then the samara peach the barbee. If something is lasting and it finance the barbee then the barbee peach the samara. If something peach the barbee then it alligator the barbee. If something finance the nat then it is lasting. The samara does not visit the barbee.", "logic": "\nRocky(barbee)\nPeach(samara, barbee)\nAlligator(nat, samara)\nforall x (Alligator(x, barbee) -> Alligator(barbee, samara))\nforall x (Alligator(x, samara) -> Stinking(x))\nUpbound(samara) and Stinking(samara) -> Peach(samara, barbee)\nforall x (Lasting(x) and Finance(x, barbee) -> Peach(barbee, samara))\nforall x (Peach(x, barbee) -> Alligator(x, barbee))\nforall x (Finance(x, nat) -> Lasting(x))\n\nnot Alligator(samara, barbee)\n\nPeach(samara, barbee) and forall x (Peach(x, barbee) -> Alligator(x, barbee)) -> therefore Alligator(samara, barbee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The saraann is scaphoid. The fanni cocker the saraann. The hollyanne stigmatize the fanni. If something stigmatize the saraann then the saraann stigmatize the fanni. If something stigmatize the fanni then it is sudorific. If the fanni is conic and the fanni is sudorific then the fanni cocker the saraann. If something is orbicular and it overtax the saraann then the saraann cocker the fanni. If something cocker the saraann then it stigmatize the saraann. If something overtax the hollyanne then it is orbicular. The saraann stigmatize the fanni.", "logic": "\nScaphoid(saraann)\nCocker(fanni, saraann)\nStigmatize(hollyanne, fanni)\nforall x (Stigmatize(x, saraann) -> Stigmatize(saraann, fanni))\nforall x (Stigmatize(x, fanni) -> Sudorific(x))\nConic(fanni) and Sudorific(fanni) -> Cocker(fanni, saraann)\nforall x (Orbicular(x) and Overtax(x, saraann) -> Cocker(saraann, fanni))\nforall x (Cocker(x, saraann) -> Stigmatize(x, saraann))\nforall x (Overtax(x, hollyanne) -> Orbicular(x))\n\nStigmatize(saraann, fanni)\n\nCocker(fanni, saraann) and forall x (Cocker(x, saraann) -> Stigmatize(x, saraann)) -> therefore Stigmatize(fanni, saraann) Stigmatize(fanni, saraann) and forall x (Stigmatize(x, saraann) -> Stigmatize(saraann, fanni)) -> therefore Stigmatize(saraann, fanni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The madel is heartfelt. The thia resent the madel. The lars monger the thia. If something monger the madel then the madel monger the thia. If something monger the thia then it is catarrhine. If the thia is tactile and the thia is catarrhine then the thia resent the madel. If something is worsened and it tamp the madel then the madel resent the thia. If something resent the madel then it monger the madel. If something tamp the lars then it is worsened. The madel does not visit the thia.", "logic": "\nHeartfelt(madel)\nResent(thia, madel)\nMonger(lars, thia)\nforall x (Monger(x, madel) -> Monger(madel, thia))\nforall x (Monger(x, thia) -> Catarrhine(x))\nTactile(thia) and Catarrhine(thia) -> Resent(thia, madel)\nforall x (Worsened(x) and Tamp(x, madel) -> Resent(madel, thia))\nforall x (Resent(x, madel) -> Monger(x, madel))\nforall x (Tamp(x, lars) -> Worsened(x))\n\nnot Monger(madel, thia)\n\nResent(thia, madel) and forall x (Resent(x, madel) -> Monger(x, madel)) -> therefore Monger(thia, madel) Monger(thia, madel) and forall x (Monger(x, madel) -> Monger(madel, thia)) -> therefore Monger(madel, thia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The desaree is groveling. The carina shamanise the desaree. The katina goffer the carina. If something goffer the desaree then the desaree goffer the carina. If something goffer the carina then it is unhealthy. If the carina is appealable and the carina is unhealthy then the carina shamanise the desaree. If something is panegyric and it mobilize the desaree then the desaree shamanise the carina. If something shamanise the desaree then it goffer the desaree. If something mobilize the katina then it is panegyric. The desaree is unhealthy.", "logic": "\nGroveling(desaree)\nShamanise(carina, desaree)\nGoffer(katina, carina)\nforall x (Goffer(x, desaree) -> Goffer(desaree, carina))\nforall x (Goffer(x, carina) -> Unhealthy(x))\nAppealable(carina) and Unhealthy(carina) -> Shamanise(carina, desaree)\nforall x (Panegyric(x) and Mobilize(x, desaree) -> Shamanise(desaree, carina))\nforall x (Shamanise(x, desaree) -> Goffer(x, desaree))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, katina) -> Panegyric(x))\n\nUnhealthy(desaree)\n\nShamanise(carina, desaree) and forall x (Shamanise(x, desaree) -> Goffer(x, desaree)) -> therefore Goffer(carina, desaree) Goffer(carina, desaree) and forall x (Goffer(x, desaree) -> Goffer(desaree, carina)) -> therefore Goffer(desaree, carina) Goffer(desaree, carina) and forall x (Goffer(x, carina) -> Unhealthy(x)) -> therefore Unhealthy(desaree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The hobart is scaphoid. The sarene okay the hobart. The tawsha elaborate the sarene. If something elaborate the hobart then the hobart elaborate the sarene. If something elaborate the sarene then it is beery. If the sarene is unicuspid and the sarene is beery then the sarene okay the hobart. If something is open and it register the hobart then the hobart okay the sarene. If something okay the hobart then it elaborate the hobart. If something register the tawsha then it is open. The hobart is not beery.", "logic": "\nScaphoid(hobart)\nOkay(sarene, hobart)\nElaborate(tawsha, sarene)\nforall x (Elaborate(x, hobart) -> Elaborate(hobart, sarene))\nforall x (Elaborate(x, sarene) -> Beery(x))\nUnicuspid(sarene) and Beery(sarene) -> Okay(sarene, hobart)\nforall x (Open(x) and Register(x, hobart) -> Okay(hobart, sarene))\nforall x (Okay(x, hobart) -> Elaborate(x, hobart))\nforall x (Register(x, tawsha) -> Open(x))\n\nnot Beery(hobart)\n\nOkay(sarene, hobart) and forall x (Okay(x, hobart) -> Elaborate(x, hobart)) -> therefore Elaborate(sarene, hobart) Elaborate(sarene, hobart) and forall x (Elaborate(x, hobart) -> Elaborate(hobart, sarene)) -> therefore Elaborate(hobart, sarene) Elaborate(hobart, sarene) and forall x (Elaborate(x, sarene) -> Beery(x)) -> therefore Beery(hobart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The fianna is blaring. The liane conduct the fianna. The valry emplane the liane. If something emplane the fianna then the fianna emplane the liane. If something emplane the liane then it is zonal. If the liane is pulmonary and the liane is zonal then the liane conduct the fianna. If something is reverting and it reassail the fianna then the fianna conduct the liane. If something conduct the fianna then it emplane the fianna. If something reassail the valry then it is reverting. The fianna is not reverting.", "logic": "\nBlaring(fianna)\nConduct(liane, fianna)\nEmplane(valry, liane)\nforall x (Emplane(x, fianna) -> Emplane(fianna, liane))\nforall x (Emplane(x, liane) -> Zonal(x))\nPulmonary(liane) and Zonal(liane) -> Conduct(liane, fianna)\nforall x (Reverting(x) and Reassail(x, fianna) -> Conduct(fianna, liane))\nforall x (Conduct(x, fianna) -> Emplane(x, fianna))\nforall x (Reassail(x, valry) -> Reverting(x))\n\nnot Reverting(fianna)\n\nforall x (Reassail(x, valry) -> Reverting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The gavrielle is untimely. The rusty caddy the gavrielle. The andree misspeak the rusty. If something misspeak the gavrielle then the gavrielle misspeak the rusty. If something misspeak the rusty then it is timorous. If the rusty is drunk and the rusty is timorous then the rusty caddy the gavrielle. If something is juridical and it disbud the gavrielle then the gavrielle caddy the rusty. If something caddy the gavrielle then it misspeak the gavrielle. If something disbud the andree then it is juridical. The gavrielle caddy the rusty.", "logic": "\nUntimely(gavrielle)\nCaddy(rusty, gavrielle)\nMisspeak(andree, rusty)\nforall x (Misspeak(x, gavrielle) -> Misspeak(gavrielle, rusty))\nforall x (Misspeak(x, rusty) -> Timorous(x))\nDrunk(rusty) and Timorous(rusty) -> Caddy(rusty, gavrielle)\nforall x (Juridical(x) and Disbud(x, gavrielle) -> Caddy(gavrielle, rusty))\nforall x (Caddy(x, gavrielle) -> Misspeak(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Disbud(x, andree) -> Juridical(x))\n\nCaddy(gavrielle, rusty)\n\nforall x (Juridical(x) and Disbud(x, gavrielle) -> Caddy(gavrielle, rusty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The kia is waxlike. The aindrea canonize the kia. The ignace crimp the aindrea. If something crimp the kia then the kia crimp the aindrea. If something crimp the aindrea then it is slapdash. If the aindrea is bossy and the aindrea is slapdash then the aindrea canonize the kia. If something is arthurian and it slam the kia then the kia canonize the aindrea. If something canonize the kia then it crimp the kia. If something slam the ignace then it is arthurian. The ignace is not arthurian.", "logic": "\nWaxlike(kia)\nCanonize(aindrea, kia)\nCrimp(ignace, aindrea)\nforall x (Crimp(x, kia) -> Crimp(kia, aindrea))\nforall x (Crimp(x, aindrea) -> Slapdash(x))\nBossy(aindrea) and Slapdash(aindrea) -> Canonize(aindrea, kia)\nforall x (Arthurian(x) and Slam(x, kia) -> Canonize(kia, aindrea))\nforall x (Canonize(x, kia) -> Crimp(x, kia))\nforall x (Slam(x, ignace) -> Arthurian(x))\n\nnot Arthurian(ignace)\n\nforall x (Slam(x, ignace) -> Arthurian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The josi is worthwhile. The brody horseshoe the josi. The lazarus unhallow the brody. If something unhallow the josi then the josi unhallow the brody. If something unhallow the brody then it is limitless. If the brody is trackless and the brody is limitless then the brody horseshoe the josi. If something is curative and it exorcize the josi then the josi horseshoe the brody. If something horseshoe the josi then it unhallow the josi. If something exorcize the lazarus then it is curative. The brody is curative.", "logic": "\nWorthwhile(josi)\nHorseshoe(brody, josi)\nUnhallow(lazarus, brody)\nforall x (Unhallow(x, josi) -> Unhallow(josi, brody))\nforall x (Unhallow(x, brody) -> Limitless(x))\nTrackless(brody) and Limitless(brody) -> Horseshoe(brody, josi)\nforall x (Curative(x) and Exorcize(x, josi) -> Horseshoe(josi, brody))\nforall x (Horseshoe(x, josi) -> Unhallow(x, josi))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, lazarus) -> Curative(x))\n\nCurative(brody)\n\nforall x (Exorcize(x, lazarus) -> Curative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The yardley is compulsive. The jorge fulfil the yardley. The ignace party the jorge. If something party the yardley then the yardley party the jorge. If something party the jorge then it is unbelted. If the jorge is iraqi and the jorge is unbelted then the jorge fulfil the yardley. If something is unframed and it hurl the yardley then the yardley fulfil the jorge. If something fulfil the yardley then it party the yardley. If something hurl the ignace then it is unframed. The yardley is not kind.", "logic": "\nCompulsive(yardley)\nFulfil(jorge, yardley)\nParty(ignace, jorge)\nforall x (Party(x, yardley) -> Party(yardley, jorge))\nforall x (Party(x, jorge) -> Unbelted(x))\nIraqi(jorge) and Unbelted(jorge) -> Fulfil(jorge, yardley)\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Hurl(x, yardley) -> Fulfil(yardley, jorge))\nforall x (Fulfil(x, yardley) -> Party(x, yardley))\nforall x (Hurl(x, ignace) -> Unframed(x))\n\nnot Kind(yardley)\n\nnot Kind(yardley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The kristi is cauline. The lex redesign the kristi. The charmane spectate the lex. If something spectate the kristi then the kristi spectate the lex. If something spectate the lex then it is prostatic. If the lex is redolent and the lex is prostatic then the lex redesign the kristi. If something is arborous and it vaporise the kristi then the kristi redesign the lex. If something redesign the kristi then it spectate the kristi. If something vaporise the charmane then it is arborous. The kristi spectate the charmane.", "logic": "\nCauline(kristi)\nRedesign(lex, kristi)\nSpectate(charmane, lex)\nforall x (Spectate(x, kristi) -> Spectate(kristi, lex))\nforall x (Spectate(x, lex) -> Prostatic(x))\nRedolent(lex) and Prostatic(lex) -> Redesign(lex, kristi)\nforall x (Arborous(x) and Vaporise(x, kristi) -> Redesign(kristi, lex))\nforall x (Redesign(x, kristi) -> Spectate(x, kristi))\nforall x (Vaporise(x, charmane) -> Arborous(x))\n\nSpectate(kristi, charmane)\n\nSpectate(kristi, charmane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The davie is taurine. The claudia decipher the davie. The corabella relieve the claudia. If something relieve the davie then the davie relieve the claudia. If something relieve the claudia then it is untiring. If the claudia is unstarred and the claudia is untiring then the claudia decipher the davie. If something is citrous and it attempt the davie then the davie decipher the claudia. If something decipher the davie then it relieve the davie. If something attempt the corabella then it is citrous. The claudia does not see the davie.", "logic": "\nTaurine(davie)\nDecipher(claudia, davie)\nRelieve(corabella, claudia)\nforall x (Relieve(x, davie) -> Relieve(davie, claudia))\nforall x (Relieve(x, claudia) -> Untiring(x))\nUnstarred(claudia) and Untiring(claudia) -> Decipher(claudia, davie)\nforall x (Citrous(x) and Attempt(x, davie) -> Decipher(davie, claudia))\nforall x (Decipher(x, davie) -> Relieve(x, davie))\nforall x (Attempt(x, corabella) -> Citrous(x))\n\nnot Attempt(claudia, davie)\n\nnot Attempt(claudia, davie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "The lyn is fatheaded. The homer rekindle the lyn. The dolores flump the homer. If something flump the lyn then the lyn flump the homer. If something flump the homer then it is obligatory. If the homer is standpat and the homer is obligatory then the homer rekindle the lyn. If something is pervasive and it page the lyn then the lyn rekindle the homer. If something rekindle the lyn then it flump the lyn. If something page the dolores then it is pervasive. The dolores is kind.", "logic": "\nFatheaded(lyn)\nRekindle(homer, lyn)\nFlump(dolores, homer)\nforall x (Flump(x, lyn) -> Flump(lyn, homer))\nforall x (Flump(x, homer) -> Obligatory(x))\nStandpat(homer) and Obligatory(homer) -> Rekindle(homer, lyn)\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and Page(x, lyn) -> Rekindle(lyn, homer))\nforall x (Rekindle(x, lyn) -> Flump(x, lyn))\nforall x (Page(x, dolores) -> Pervasive(x))\n\nKind(dolores)\n\nKind(dolores) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-94"} {"premises": "Donna is echoless. Alys is echoless. Paula is wheezing. Furry, australian people are not egyptian. All egyptian people are not prox. Blue, wheezing people are preset. Red people are preset. If someone is shorn then they are preset. If someone is australian and not prox then they are preset. Alys is echoless.", "logic": "\nEcholess(donna)\nEcholess(alys)\nWheezing(paula)\nforall x (Shorn(x) and Australian(x) -> not Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Egyptian(x) -> not Prox(x))\nforall x (Australian(x) and Wheezing(x) -> Preset(x))\nforall x (Echoless(x) -> Preset(x))\nforall x (Shorn(x) -> Preset(x))\nforall x (Australian(x) and not Prox(x) -> Preset(x))\n\nEcholess(alys)\n\ntherefore Echoless(alys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Casie is labile. Rena is labile. Bethina is galwegian. Furry, oneiric people are not dishy. All dishy people are not laced. Blue, galwegian people are exorbitant. Red people are exorbitant. If someone is bronzed then they are exorbitant. If someone is oneiric and not laced then they are exorbitant. Rena is not labile.", "logic": "\nLabile(casie)\nLabile(rena)\nGalwegian(bethina)\nforall x (Bronzed(x) and Oneiric(x) -> not Dishy(x))\nforall x (Dishy(x) -> not Laced(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Galwegian(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Bronzed(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and not Laced(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\n\nnot Labile(rena)\n\ntherefore Labile(rena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Monte is riddled. Bradly is riddled. Jemmie is isocyclic. Furry, unequipped people are not woolly. All woolly people are not dickensian. Blue, isocyclic people are unprovable. Red people are unprovable. If someone is loving then they are unprovable. If someone is unequipped and not dickensian then they are unprovable. Monte is unprovable.", "logic": "\nRiddled(monte)\nRiddled(bradly)\nIsocyclic(jemmie)\nforall x (Loving(x) and Unequipped(x) -> not Woolly(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> not Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) and Isocyclic(x) -> Unprovable(x))\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> Unprovable(x))\nforall x (Loving(x) -> Unprovable(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) and not Dickensian(x) -> Unprovable(x))\n\nUnprovable(monte)\n\nRiddled(monte) and forall x (Riddled(x) -> Unprovable(x)) -> therefore Unprovable(monte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Alleen is droll. Jon is droll. Tova is pricey. Furry, adactylous people are not transonic. All transonic people are not fluid. Blue, pricey people are reviving. Red people are reviving. If someone is just then they are reviving. If someone is adactylous and not fluid then they are reviving. Alleen is not reviving.", "logic": "\nDroll(alleen)\nDroll(jon)\nPricey(tova)\nforall x (Just(x) and Adactylous(x) -> not Transonic(x))\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> not Fluid(x))\nforall x (Adactylous(x) and Pricey(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Droll(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Just(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Adactylous(x) and not Fluid(x) -> Reviving(x))\n\nnot Reviving(alleen)\n\nDroll(alleen) and forall x (Droll(x) -> Reviving(x)) -> therefore Reviving(alleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Janeva is fricative. Wash is fricative. Cami is underlying. Furry, unverified people are not triplex. All triplex people are not vented. Blue, underlying people are egoistic. Red people are egoistic. If someone is milled then they are egoistic. If someone is unverified and not vented then they are egoistic. Cami is not egoistic.", "logic": "\nFricative(janeva)\nFricative(wash)\nUnderlying(cami)\nforall x (Milled(x) and Unverified(x) -> not Triplex(x))\nforall x (Triplex(x) -> not Vented(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) and Underlying(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Fricative(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) and not Vented(x) -> Egoistic(x))\n\nnot Egoistic(cami)\n\nforall x (Unverified(x) and Underlying(x) -> Egoistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Angelina is hyaline. Elwin is hyaline. Kathlin is alsatian. Furry, nett people are not unasked. All unasked people are not jocund. Blue, alsatian people are lxxii. Red people are lxxii. If someone is skirting then they are lxxii. If someone is nett and not jocund then they are lxxii. Angelina is alsatian.", "logic": "\nHyaline(angelina)\nHyaline(elwin)\nAlsatian(kathlin)\nforall x (Skirting(x) and Nett(x) -> not Unasked(x))\nforall x (Unasked(x) -> not Jocund(x))\nforall x (Nett(x) and Alsatian(x) -> Lxxii(x))\nforall x (Hyaline(x) -> Lxxii(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Lxxii(x))\nforall x (Nett(x) and not Jocund(x) -> Lxxii(x))\n\nAlsatian(angelina)\n\nAlsatian(angelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Marius is concealed. Helge is concealed. Dorolice is autotypic. Furry, zonary people are not dorsal. All dorsal people are not consoling. Blue, autotypic people are pursuant. Red people are pursuant. If someone is affirmable then they are pursuant. If someone is zonary and not consoling then they are pursuant. Dorolice is not affirmable.", "logic": "\nConcealed(marius)\nConcealed(helge)\nAutotypic(dorolice)\nforall x (Affirmable(x) and Zonary(x) -> not Dorsal(x))\nforall x (Dorsal(x) -> not Consoling(x))\nforall x (Zonary(x) and Autotypic(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Concealed(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Zonary(x) and not Consoling(x) -> Pursuant(x))\n\nnot Affirmable(dorolice)\n\nnot Affirmable(dorolice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Guthry is bastard. Aggi is bastard. Nelle is globose. Furry, incised people are not subnormal. All subnormal people are not xliv. Blue, globose people are freehand. Red people are freehand. If someone is nonunion then they are freehand. If someone is incised and not xliv then they are freehand. Aggi is nonunion.", "logic": "\nBastard(guthry)\nBastard(aggi)\nGlobose(nelle)\nforall x (Nonunion(x) and Incised(x) -> not Subnormal(x))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) -> not Xliv(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) and Globose(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Bastard(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) and not Xliv(x) -> Freehand(x))\n\nNonunion(aggi)\n\nNonunion(aggi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1566"} {"premises": "Angelique is pakistani. Angelique is selective. Angelique is cervical. Angelique is aged. Angelique is vapourised. Angelique is moneyed. Angelique is flyaway. All vapourised, cervical things are aged. If Angelique is cervical then Angelique is vapourised. Angelique is moneyed.", "logic": "\nPakistani(angelique)\nSelective(angelique)\nCervical(angelique)\nAged(angelique)\nVapourised(angelique)\nMoneyed(angelique)\nFlyaway(angelique)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Cervical(x) -> Aged(x))\nCervical(angelique) -> Vapourised(angelique)\n\nMoneyed(angelique)\n\ntherefore Moneyed(angelique)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3891"} {"premises": "Jermaine is fitful. Jermaine is male. Jermaine is hiplength. Jermaine is pyrolytic. Jermaine is delicious. Jermaine is negotiable. Jermaine is amylolytic. All delicious, hiplength things are pyrolytic. If Jermaine is hiplength then Jermaine is delicious. Jermaine is not male.", "logic": "\nFitful(jermaine)\nMale(jermaine)\nHiplength(jermaine)\nPyrolytic(jermaine)\nDelicious(jermaine)\nNegotiable(jermaine)\nAmylolytic(jermaine)\nforall x (Delicious(x) and Hiplength(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\nHiplength(jermaine) -> Delicious(jermaine)\n\nnot Male(jermaine)\n\ntherefore Male(jermaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3891"} {"premises": "Patrik is serpentine. Patrik is unready. Joey is nationwide. Joey is unready. Joey is torrid. Joey is draped. Joey is smiling. All unready people are smiling. If Patrik is vicenary then Patrik is serpentine. If Joey is nationwide and Joey is draped then Joey is torrid. Red people are smiling. If someone is unready and vicenary then they are torrid. Red, serpentine people are vicenary. If Patrik is nationwide and Patrik is draped then Patrik is torrid. All unready people are draped. Joey is unready.", "logic": "\nSerpentine(patrik)\nUnready(patrik)\nNationwide(joey)\nUnready(joey)\nTorrid(joey)\nDraped(joey)\nSmiling(joey)\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Smiling(x))\nVicenary(patrik) -> Serpentine(patrik)\nNationwide(joey) and Draped(joey) -> Torrid(joey)\nforall x (Draped(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Vicenary(x) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Draped(x) and Serpentine(x) -> Vicenary(x))\nNationwide(patrik) and Draped(patrik) -> Torrid(patrik)\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Draped(x))\n\nUnready(joey)\n\ntherefore Unready(joey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Bucky is campanular. Bucky is wily. Bryce is hyoid. Bryce is wily. Bryce is unsuited. Bryce is darkling. Bryce is opened. All wily people are opened. If Bucky is wordless then Bucky is campanular. If Bryce is hyoid and Bryce is darkling then Bryce is unsuited. Red people are opened. If someone is wily and wordless then they are unsuited. Red, campanular people are wordless. If Bucky is hyoid and Bucky is darkling then Bucky is unsuited. All wily people are darkling. Bryce is not hyoid.", "logic": "\nCampanular(bucky)\nWily(bucky)\nHyoid(bryce)\nWily(bryce)\nUnsuited(bryce)\nDarkling(bryce)\nOpened(bryce)\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Opened(x))\nWordless(bucky) -> Campanular(bucky)\nHyoid(bryce) and Darkling(bryce) -> Unsuited(bryce)\nforall x (Darkling(x) -> Opened(x))\nforall x (Wily(x) and Wordless(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nforall x (Darkling(x) and Campanular(x) -> Wordless(x))\nHyoid(bucky) and Darkling(bucky) -> Unsuited(bucky)\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Darkling(x))\n\nnot Hyoid(bryce)\n\ntherefore Hyoid(bryce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Wittie is unseeable. Wittie is separative. Bradley is unwary. Bradley is separative. Bradley is boon. Bradley is unportable. Bradley is effulgent. All separative people are effulgent. If Wittie is inviolate then Wittie is unseeable. If Bradley is unwary and Bradley is unportable then Bradley is boon. Red people are effulgent. If someone is separative and inviolate then they are boon. Red, unseeable people are inviolate. If Wittie is unwary and Wittie is unportable then Wittie is boon. All separative people are unportable. Wittie is effulgent.", "logic": "\nUnseeable(wittie)\nSeparative(wittie)\nUnwary(bradley)\nSeparative(bradley)\nBoon(bradley)\nUnportable(bradley)\nEffulgent(bradley)\nforall x (Separative(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nInviolate(wittie) -> Unseeable(wittie)\nUnwary(bradley) and Unportable(bradley) -> Boon(bradley)\nforall x (Unportable(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Separative(x) and Inviolate(x) -> Boon(x))\nforall x (Unportable(x) and Unseeable(x) -> Inviolate(x))\nUnwary(wittie) and Unportable(wittie) -> Boon(wittie)\nforall x (Separative(x) -> Unportable(x))\n\nEffulgent(wittie)\n\nSeparative(wittie) and forall x (Separative(x) -> Effulgent(x)) -> therefore Effulgent(wittie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Cordelia is deserving. Cordelia is phalangeal. Bianca is helminthic. Bianca is phalangeal. Bianca is comforted. Bianca is disheveled. Bianca is embattled. All phalangeal people are embattled. If Cordelia is chartered then Cordelia is deserving. If Bianca is helminthic and Bianca is disheveled then Bianca is comforted. Red people are embattled. If someone is phalangeal and chartered then they are comforted. Red, deserving people are chartered. If Cordelia is helminthic and Cordelia is disheveled then Cordelia is comforted. All phalangeal people are disheveled. Cordelia is not embattled.", "logic": "\nDeserving(cordelia)\nPhalangeal(cordelia)\nHelminthic(bianca)\nPhalangeal(bianca)\nComforted(bianca)\nDisheveled(bianca)\nEmbattled(bianca)\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) -> Embattled(x))\nChartered(cordelia) -> Deserving(cordelia)\nHelminthic(bianca) and Disheveled(bianca) -> Comforted(bianca)\nforall x (Disheveled(x) -> Embattled(x))\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) and Chartered(x) -> Comforted(x))\nforall x (Disheveled(x) and Deserving(x) -> Chartered(x))\nHelminthic(cordelia) and Disheveled(cordelia) -> Comforted(cordelia)\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) -> Disheveled(x))\n\nnot Embattled(cordelia)\n\nPhalangeal(cordelia) and forall x (Phalangeal(x) -> Embattled(x)) -> therefore Embattled(cordelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Corinne is apneic. Corinne is meltable. Mackenzie is sanctified. Mackenzie is meltable. Mackenzie is votive. Mackenzie is humongous. Mackenzie is blaring. All meltable people are blaring. If Corinne is truncate then Corinne is apneic. If Mackenzie is sanctified and Mackenzie is humongous then Mackenzie is votive. Red people are blaring. If someone is meltable and truncate then they are votive. Red, apneic people are truncate. If Corinne is sanctified and Corinne is humongous then Corinne is votive. All meltable people are humongous. Corinne is truncate.", "logic": "\nApneic(corinne)\nMeltable(corinne)\nSanctified(mackenzie)\nMeltable(mackenzie)\nVotive(mackenzie)\nHumongous(mackenzie)\nBlaring(mackenzie)\nforall x (Meltable(x) -> Blaring(x))\nTruncate(corinne) -> Apneic(corinne)\nSanctified(mackenzie) and Humongous(mackenzie) -> Votive(mackenzie)\nforall x (Humongous(x) -> Blaring(x))\nforall x (Meltable(x) and Truncate(x) -> Votive(x))\nforall x (Humongous(x) and Apneic(x) -> Truncate(x))\nSanctified(corinne) and Humongous(corinne) -> Votive(corinne)\nforall x (Meltable(x) -> Humongous(x))\n\nTruncate(corinne)\n\nMeltable(corinne) and forall x (Meltable(x) -> Humongous(x)) -> therefore Humongous(corinne) Humongous(corinne) and Apneic(corinne) and forall x (Humongous(x) and Apneic(x) -> Truncate(x)) -> therefore Truncate(corinne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Delphina is pricy. Delphina is olfactory. Wynne is inexorable. Wynne is olfactory. Wynne is tantamount. Wynne is literal. Wynne is unavenged. All olfactory people are unavenged. If Delphina is roiled then Delphina is pricy. If Wynne is inexorable and Wynne is literal then Wynne is tantamount. Red people are unavenged. If someone is olfactory and roiled then they are tantamount. Red, pricy people are roiled. If Delphina is inexorable and Delphina is literal then Delphina is tantamount. All olfactory people are literal. Delphina is not roiled.", "logic": "\nPricy(delphina)\nOlfactory(delphina)\nInexorable(wynne)\nOlfactory(wynne)\nTantamount(wynne)\nLiteral(wynne)\nUnavenged(wynne)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) -> Unavenged(x))\nRoiled(delphina) -> Pricy(delphina)\nInexorable(wynne) and Literal(wynne) -> Tantamount(wynne)\nforall x (Literal(x) -> Unavenged(x))\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and Roiled(x) -> Tantamount(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Pricy(x) -> Roiled(x))\nInexorable(delphina) and Literal(delphina) -> Tantamount(delphina)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) -> Literal(x))\n\nnot Roiled(delphina)\n\nOlfactory(delphina) and forall x (Olfactory(x) -> Literal(x)) -> therefore Literal(delphina) Literal(delphina) and Pricy(delphina) and forall x (Literal(x) and Pricy(x) -> Roiled(x)) -> therefore Roiled(delphina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Berthe is myalgic. Berthe is laminal. Fara is throaty. Fara is laminal. Fara is dulcet. Fara is monocarpic. Fara is eared. All laminal people are eared. If Berthe is kinky then Berthe is myalgic. If Fara is throaty and Fara is monocarpic then Fara is dulcet. Red people are eared. If someone is laminal and kinky then they are dulcet. Red, myalgic people are kinky. If Berthe is throaty and Berthe is monocarpic then Berthe is dulcet. All laminal people are monocarpic. Berthe is dulcet.", "logic": "\nMyalgic(berthe)\nLaminal(berthe)\nThroaty(fara)\nLaminal(fara)\nDulcet(fara)\nMonocarpic(fara)\nEared(fara)\nforall x (Laminal(x) -> Eared(x))\nKinky(berthe) -> Myalgic(berthe)\nThroaty(fara) and Monocarpic(fara) -> Dulcet(fara)\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) -> Eared(x))\nforall x (Laminal(x) and Kinky(x) -> Dulcet(x))\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) and Myalgic(x) -> Kinky(x))\nThroaty(berthe) and Monocarpic(berthe) -> Dulcet(berthe)\nforall x (Laminal(x) -> Monocarpic(x))\n\nDulcet(berthe)\n\nLaminal(berthe) and forall x (Laminal(x) -> Monocarpic(x)) -> therefore Monocarpic(berthe) Monocarpic(berthe) and Myalgic(berthe) and forall x (Monocarpic(x) and Myalgic(x) -> Kinky(x)) -> therefore Kinky(berthe) Laminal(berthe) and Kinky(berthe) and forall x (Laminal(x) and Kinky(x) -> Dulcet(x)) -> therefore Dulcet(berthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Gail is pouring. Gail is epizootic. Victoria is sore. Victoria is epizootic. Victoria is eccrine. Victoria is hardline. Victoria is taxonomic. All epizootic people are taxonomic. If Gail is pendant then Gail is pouring. If Victoria is sore and Victoria is hardline then Victoria is eccrine. Red people are taxonomic. If someone is epizootic and pendant then they are eccrine. Red, pouring people are pendant. If Gail is sore and Gail is hardline then Gail is eccrine. All epizootic people are hardline. Gail is not eccrine.", "logic": "\nPouring(gail)\nEpizootic(gail)\nSore(victoria)\nEpizootic(victoria)\nEccrine(victoria)\nHardline(victoria)\nTaxonomic(victoria)\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Taxonomic(x))\nPendant(gail) -> Pouring(gail)\nSore(victoria) and Hardline(victoria) -> Eccrine(victoria)\nforall x (Hardline(x) -> Taxonomic(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) and Pendant(x) -> Eccrine(x))\nforall x (Hardline(x) and Pouring(x) -> Pendant(x))\nSore(gail) and Hardline(gail) -> Eccrine(gail)\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Hardline(x))\n\nnot Eccrine(gail)\n\nEpizootic(gail) and forall x (Epizootic(x) -> Hardline(x)) -> therefore Hardline(gail) Hardline(gail) and Pouring(gail) and forall x (Hardline(x) and Pouring(x) -> Pendant(x)) -> therefore Pendant(gail) Epizootic(gail) and Pendant(gail) and forall x (Epizootic(x) and Pendant(x) -> Eccrine(x)) -> therefore Eccrine(gail)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Lib is goofy. Lib is inebriated. Edsel is alternate. Edsel is inebriated. Edsel is trivalent. Edsel is enervated. Edsel is sedentary. All inebriated people are sedentary. If Lib is backed then Lib is goofy. If Edsel is alternate and Edsel is enervated then Edsel is trivalent. Red people are sedentary. If someone is inebriated and backed then they are trivalent. Red, goofy people are backed. If Lib is alternate and Lib is enervated then Lib is trivalent. All inebriated people are enervated. Edsel is not backed.", "logic": "\nGoofy(lib)\nInebriated(lib)\nAlternate(edsel)\nInebriated(edsel)\nTrivalent(edsel)\nEnervated(edsel)\nSedentary(edsel)\nforall x (Inebriated(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nBacked(lib) -> Goofy(lib)\nAlternate(edsel) and Enervated(edsel) -> Trivalent(edsel)\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nforall x (Inebriated(x) and Backed(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nforall x (Enervated(x) and Goofy(x) -> Backed(x))\nAlternate(lib) and Enervated(lib) -> Trivalent(lib)\nforall x (Inebriated(x) -> Enervated(x))\n\nnot Backed(edsel)\n\nforall x (Enervated(x) and Goofy(x) -> Backed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "Remy is marxist. Remy is styptic. Mamie is silklike. Mamie is styptic. Mamie is paneled. Mamie is brumous. Mamie is velvet. All styptic people are velvet. If Remy is barytic then Remy is marxist. If Mamie is silklike and Mamie is brumous then Mamie is paneled. Red people are velvet. If someone is styptic and barytic then they are paneled. Red, marxist people are barytic. If Remy is silklike and Remy is brumous then Remy is paneled. All styptic people are brumous. Remy is silklike.", "logic": "\nMarxist(remy)\nStyptic(remy)\nSilklike(mamie)\nStyptic(mamie)\nPaneled(mamie)\nBrumous(mamie)\nVelvet(mamie)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Velvet(x))\nBarytic(remy) -> Marxist(remy)\nSilklike(mamie) and Brumous(mamie) -> Paneled(mamie)\nforall x (Brumous(x) -> Velvet(x))\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Barytic(x) -> Paneled(x))\nforall x (Brumous(x) and Marxist(x) -> Barytic(x))\nSilklike(remy) and Brumous(remy) -> Paneled(remy)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Brumous(x))\n\nSilklike(remy)\n\nSilklike(remy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-127"} {"premises": "The tori outfox the piggy. The tori repudiate the piggy. The billy is unwavering. The billy average the tori. The piggy is asthenic. The charleen outfox the tori. The charleen repudiate the tori. If something is asthenic then it is flamboyant. The charleen outfox the tori.", "logic": "\nOutfox(tori, piggy)\nRepudiate(tori, piggy)\nUnwavering(billy)\nAverage(billy, tori)\nAsthenic(piggy)\nOutfox(charleen, tori)\nRepudiate(charleen, tori)\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\n\nOutfox(charleen, tori)\n\ntherefore Outfox(charleen, tori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "The jenine reprise the wilma. The jenine wink the wilma. The min is aggregate. The min trowel the jenine. The wilma is hourly. The holly reprise the jenine. The holly wink the jenine. If something is hourly then it is blastular. The wilma is not hourly.", "logic": "\nReprise(jenine, wilma)\nWink(jenine, wilma)\nAggregate(min)\nTrowel(min, jenine)\nHourly(wilma)\nReprise(holly, jenine)\nWink(holly, jenine)\nforall x (Hourly(x) -> Blastular(x))\n\nnot Hourly(wilma)\n\ntherefore Hourly(wilma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "The stanfield bosom the joby. The stanfield localize the joby. The brea is sporting. The brea polemicise the stanfield. The joby is bubbly. The sargent bosom the stanfield. The sargent localize the stanfield. If something is bubbly then it is incurious. The joby is incurious.", "logic": "\nBosom(stanfield, joby)\nLocalize(stanfield, joby)\nSporting(brea)\nPolemicise(brea, stanfield)\nBubbly(joby)\nBosom(sargent, stanfield)\nLocalize(sargent, stanfield)\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Incurious(x))\n\nIncurious(joby)\n\nBubbly(joby) and forall x (Bubbly(x) -> Incurious(x)) -> therefore Incurious(joby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "The dona cosponsor the anny. The dona jackrabbit the anny. The morissa is anthropoid. The morissa recruit the dona. The anny is nonplussed. The joice cosponsor the dona. The joice jackrabbit the dona. If something is nonplussed then it is aldermanly. The anny is not aldermanly.", "logic": "\nCosponsor(dona, anny)\nJackrabbit(dona, anny)\nAnthropoid(morissa)\nRecruit(morissa, dona)\nNonplussed(anny)\nCosponsor(joice, dona)\nJackrabbit(joice, dona)\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Aldermanly(x))\n\nnot Aldermanly(anny)\n\nNonplussed(anny) and forall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Aldermanly(x)) -> therefore Aldermanly(anny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "The rosalia solace the avis. The rosalia advocate the avis. The elna is misguided. The elna shoo the rosalia. The avis is enraged. The shoshie solace the rosalia. The shoshie advocate the rosalia. If something is enraged then it is nonimmune. The elna is not nonimmune.", "logic": "\nSolace(rosalia, avis)\nAdvocate(rosalia, avis)\nMisguided(elna)\nShoo(elna, rosalia)\nEnraged(avis)\nSolace(shoshie, rosalia)\nAdvocate(shoshie, rosalia)\nforall x (Enraged(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\n\nnot Nonimmune(elna)\n\nforall x (Enraged(x) -> Nonimmune(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "The esma bathe the demetra. The esma habit the demetra. The donna is analyzed. The donna mass the esma. The demetra is steamed. The ricardo bathe the esma. The ricardo habit the esma. If something is steamed then it is allegro. The ricardo is allegro.", "logic": "\nBathe(esma, demetra)\nHabit(esma, demetra)\nAnalyzed(donna)\nMass(donna, esma)\nSteamed(demetra)\nBathe(ricardo, esma)\nHabit(ricardo, esma)\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Allegro(x))\n\nAllegro(ricardo)\n\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Allegro(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "The hercule sterilise the mariska. The hercule salaam the mariska. The bessy is unsoiled. The bessy arbitrage the hercule. The mariska is unmusical. The eugene sterilise the hercule. The eugene salaam the hercule. If something is unmusical then it is scraggy. The hercule is not unmusical.", "logic": "\nSterilise(hercule, mariska)\nSalaam(hercule, mariska)\nUnsoiled(bessy)\nArbitrage(bessy, hercule)\nUnmusical(mariska)\nSterilise(eugene, hercule)\nSalaam(eugene, hercule)\nforall x (Unmusical(x) -> Scraggy(x))\n\nnot Unmusical(hercule)\n\nnot Unmusical(hercule) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "The brear dusk the bunnie. The brear aspire the bunnie. The raleigh is fake. The raleigh exemplify the brear. The bunnie is unwooded. The slim dusk the brear. The slim aspire the brear. If something is unwooded then it is proximal. The brear aspire the raleigh.", "logic": "\nDusk(brear, bunnie)\nAspire(brear, bunnie)\nFake(raleigh)\nExemplify(raleigh, brear)\nUnwooded(bunnie)\nDusk(slim, brear)\nAspire(slim, brear)\nforall x (Unwooded(x) -> Proximal(x))\n\nAspire(brear, raleigh)\n\nAspire(brear, raleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-752"} {"premises": "Garret is bootleg. Dyana is sightly. Duke is not roguish. All bootleg things are willing. Nice things are willing. Smart things are obvious. If something is roguish and not obvious then it is sightly. All obvious things are sightly. If something is intricate and not obvious then it is not ectopic. Garret is bootleg.", "logic": "\nBootleg(garret)\nSightly(dyana)\nnot Roguish(duke)\nforall x (Bootleg(x) -> Willing(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Willing(x))\nforall x (Willing(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Roguish(x) and not Obvious(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Sightly(x))\nforall x (Intricate(x) and not Obvious(x) -> not Ectopic(x))\n\nBootleg(garret)\n\ntherefore Bootleg(garret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Tedra is westside. Kissee is neither. Mirilla is not glistening. All westside things are upwind. Nice things are upwind. Smart things are aversive. If something is glistening and not aversive then it is neither. All aversive things are neither. If something is deferent and not aversive then it is not enlarged. Kissee is not neither.", "logic": "\nWestside(tedra)\nNeither(kissee)\nnot Glistening(mirilla)\nforall x (Westside(x) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Aversive(x) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> Aversive(x))\nforall x (Glistening(x) and not Aversive(x) -> Neither(x))\nforall x (Aversive(x) -> Neither(x))\nforall x (Deferent(x) and not Aversive(x) -> not Enlarged(x))\n\nnot Neither(kissee)\n\ntherefore Neither(kissee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Whitman is pharyngeal. Elaine is rarefied. Davidson is not appendaged. All pharyngeal things are vague. Nice things are vague. Smart things are global. If something is appendaged and not global then it is rarefied. All global things are rarefied. If something is mendacious and not global then it is not gratuitous. Whitman is vague.", "logic": "\nPharyngeal(whitman)\nRarefied(elaine)\nnot Appendaged(davidson)\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Global(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) -> Global(x))\nforall x (Appendaged(x) and not Global(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Global(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Mendacious(x) and not Global(x) -> not Gratuitous(x))\n\nVague(whitman)\n\nPharyngeal(whitman) and forall x (Pharyngeal(x) -> Vague(x)) -> therefore Vague(whitman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Cosmo is septic. Donetta is donnish. Philomena is not lamplit. All septic things are walloping. Nice things are walloping. Smart things are dumpy. If something is lamplit and not dumpy then it is donnish. All dumpy things are donnish. If something is seasonable and not dumpy then it is not underwater. Cosmo is not walloping.", "logic": "\nSeptic(cosmo)\nDonnish(donetta)\nnot Lamplit(philomena)\nforall x (Septic(x) -> Walloping(x))\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Walloping(x))\nforall x (Walloping(x) -> Dumpy(x))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) and not Dumpy(x) -> Donnish(x))\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Donnish(x))\nforall x (Seasonable(x) and not Dumpy(x) -> not Underwater(x))\n\nnot Walloping(cosmo)\n\nSeptic(cosmo) and forall x (Septic(x) -> Walloping(x)) -> therefore Walloping(cosmo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Charlena is chafflike. Tammi is verboten. Matthew is not three. All chafflike things are apophatic. Nice things are apophatic. Smart things are rested. If something is three and not rested then it is verboten. All rested things are verboten. If something is barefooted and not rested then it is not admonitory. Charlena is rested.", "logic": "\nChafflike(charlena)\nVerboten(tammi)\nnot Three(matthew)\nforall x (Chafflike(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Rested(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Rested(x))\nforall x (Three(x) and not Rested(x) -> Verboten(x))\nforall x (Rested(x) -> Verboten(x))\nforall x (Barefooted(x) and not Rested(x) -> not Admonitory(x))\n\nRested(charlena)\n\nChafflike(charlena) and forall x (Chafflike(x) -> Apophatic(x)) -> therefore Apophatic(charlena) Apophatic(charlena) and forall x (Apophatic(x) -> Rested(x)) -> therefore Rested(charlena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Tanny is evanescent. Terese is edged. Cordey is not polyvalent. All evanescent things are bushed. Nice things are bushed. Smart things are amoeboid. If something is polyvalent and not amoeboid then it is edged. All amoeboid things are edged. If something is uncured and not amoeboid then it is not powered. Tanny is not amoeboid.", "logic": "\nEvanescent(tanny)\nEdged(terese)\nnot Polyvalent(cordey)\nforall x (Evanescent(x) -> Bushed(x))\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Bushed(x))\nforall x (Bushed(x) -> Amoeboid(x))\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) and not Amoeboid(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Uncured(x) and not Amoeboid(x) -> not Powered(x))\n\nnot Amoeboid(tanny)\n\nEvanescent(tanny) and forall x (Evanescent(x) -> Bushed(x)) -> therefore Bushed(tanny) Bushed(tanny) and forall x (Bushed(x) -> Amoeboid(x)) -> therefore Amoeboid(tanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Ansel is squinched. Kacey is postictal. Antonella is not carolean. All squinched things are creole. Nice things are creole. Smart things are monecious. If something is carolean and not monecious then it is postictal. All monecious things are postictal. If something is bicolour and not monecious then it is not angelical. Ansel is postictal.", "logic": "\nSquinched(ansel)\nPostictal(kacey)\nnot Carolean(antonella)\nforall x (Squinched(x) -> Creole(x))\nforall x (Monecious(x) -> Creole(x))\nforall x (Creole(x) -> Monecious(x))\nforall x (Carolean(x) and not Monecious(x) -> Postictal(x))\nforall x (Monecious(x) -> Postictal(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and not Monecious(x) -> not Angelical(x))\n\nPostictal(ansel)\n\nSquinched(ansel) and forall x (Squinched(x) -> Creole(x)) -> therefore Creole(ansel) Creole(ansel) and forall x (Creole(x) -> Monecious(x)) -> therefore Monecious(ansel) Monecious(ansel) and forall x (Monecious(x) -> Postictal(x)) -> therefore Postictal(ansel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Dorie is hokey. Sonny is anorthitic. Sharona is not achromic. All hokey things are apteral. Nice things are apteral. Smart things are effective. If something is achromic and not effective then it is anorthitic. All effective things are anorthitic. If something is unhinged and not effective then it is not metastatic. Dorie is not anorthitic.", "logic": "\nHokey(dorie)\nAnorthitic(sonny)\nnot Achromic(sharona)\nforall x (Hokey(x) -> Apteral(x))\nforall x (Effective(x) -> Apteral(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) -> Effective(x))\nforall x (Achromic(x) and not Effective(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Effective(x) -> Anorthitic(x))\nforall x (Unhinged(x) and not Effective(x) -> not Metastatic(x))\n\nnot Anorthitic(dorie)\n\nHokey(dorie) and forall x (Hokey(x) -> Apteral(x)) -> therefore Apteral(dorie) Apteral(dorie) and forall x (Apteral(x) -> Effective(x)) -> therefore Effective(dorie) Effective(dorie) and forall x (Effective(x) -> Anorthitic(x)) -> therefore Anorthitic(dorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Wendi is datable. Fidela is blond. Cristi is not clubbable. All datable things are human. Nice things are human. Smart things are concordant. If something is clubbable and not concordant then it is blond. All concordant things are blond. If something is nativistic and not concordant then it is not unsanded. Fidela is not human.", "logic": "\nDatable(wendi)\nBlond(fidela)\nnot Clubbable(cristi)\nforall x (Datable(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Concordant(x))\nforall x (Clubbable(x) and not Concordant(x) -> Blond(x))\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Blond(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and not Concordant(x) -> not Unsanded(x))\n\nnot Human(fidela)\n\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Human(x)) <- forall x (Human(x) -> Concordant(x)) <- forall x (Datable(x) -> Human(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Elroy is seasick. Bernardo is trying. Fremont is not consistent. All seasick things are untimely. Nice things are untimely. Smart things are haploidic. If something is consistent and not haploidic then it is trying. All haploidic things are trying. If something is flagellate and not haploidic then it is not fugitive. Fremont is haploidic.", "logic": "\nSeasick(elroy)\nTrying(bernardo)\nnot Consistent(fremont)\nforall x (Seasick(x) -> Untimely(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Untimely(x))\nforall x (Untimely(x) -> Haploidic(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) and not Haploidic(x) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) and not Haploidic(x) -> not Fugitive(x))\n\nHaploidic(fremont)\n\nforall x (Untimely(x) -> Haploidic(x)) <- forall x (Seasick(x) -> Untimely(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Jewelle is embonpoint. Thom is assentient. Maurie is not quadruplex. All embonpoint things are polytonal. Nice things are polytonal. Smart things are amatory. If something is quadruplex and not amatory then it is assentient. All amatory things are assentient. If something is uncharged and not amatory then it is not concerted. Maurie is not assentient.", "logic": "\nEmbonpoint(jewelle)\nAssentient(thom)\nnot Quadruplex(maurie)\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Amatory(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) and not Amatory(x) -> Assentient(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Assentient(x))\nforall x (Uncharged(x) and not Amatory(x) -> not Concerted(x))\n\nnot Assentient(maurie)\n\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Assentient(x)) <- forall x (Polytonal(x) -> Amatory(x)) <- forall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Polytonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Hana is afraid. Michail is churlish. Kerianne is not provident. All afraid things are tapering. Nice things are tapering. Smart things are immutable. If something is provident and not immutable then it is churlish. All immutable things are churlish. If something is skittish and not immutable then it is not velvety. Kerianne is tapering.", "logic": "\nAfraid(hana)\nChurlish(michail)\nnot Provident(kerianne)\nforall x (Afraid(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Tapering(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Provident(x) and not Immutable(x) -> Churlish(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Churlish(x))\nforall x (Skittish(x) and not Immutable(x) -> not Velvety(x))\n\nTapering(kerianne)\n\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Tapering(x)) <- forall x (Tapering(x) -> Immutable(x)) <- forall x (Afraid(x) -> Tapering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Bruce is disklike. Rowena is catalan. Vincent is not nonverbal. All disklike things are summative. Nice things are summative. Smart things are purebred. If something is nonverbal and not purebred then it is catalan. All purebred things are catalan. If something is average and not purebred then it is not volute. Bruce is not average.", "logic": "\nDisklike(bruce)\nCatalan(rowena)\nnot Nonverbal(vincent)\nforall x (Disklike(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Purebred(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) -> Purebred(x))\nforall x (Nonverbal(x) and not Purebred(x) -> Catalan(x))\nforall x (Purebred(x) -> Catalan(x))\nforall x (Average(x) and not Purebred(x) -> not Volute(x))\n\nnot Average(bruce)\n\nnot Average(bruce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Dedra is potent. Pauli is seventieth. Brandi is not intrastate. All potent things are shaven. Nice things are shaven. Smart things are narrative. If something is intrastate and not narrative then it is seventieth. All narrative things are seventieth. If something is unmannerly and not narrative then it is not shaggy. Dedra is intrastate.", "logic": "\nPotent(dedra)\nSeventieth(pauli)\nnot Intrastate(brandi)\nforall x (Potent(x) -> Shaven(x))\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Shaven(x))\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Narrative(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) and not Narrative(x) -> Seventieth(x))\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Seventieth(x))\nforall x (Unmannerly(x) and not Narrative(x) -> not Shaggy(x))\n\nIntrastate(dedra)\n\nIntrastate(dedra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Marcia is awheel. Lizzie is offstage. Alonzo is not heartfelt. All awheel things are scaphoid. Nice things are scaphoid. Smart things are abient. If something is heartfelt and not abient then it is offstage. All abient things are offstage. If something is blockish and not abient then it is not uncarpeted. Alonzo is not blockish.", "logic": "\nAwheel(marcia)\nOffstage(lizzie)\nnot Heartfelt(alonzo)\nforall x (Awheel(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Abient(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) and not Abient(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Blockish(x) and not Abient(x) -> not Uncarpeted(x))\n\nnot Blockish(alonzo)\n\nnot Blockish(alonzo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Christen is crannied. Zachary is naturistic. Guillema is not eucaryotic. All crannied things are knotty. Nice things are knotty. Smart things are planar. If something is eucaryotic and not planar then it is naturistic. All planar things are naturistic. If something is insistent and not planar then it is not unavenged. Zachary is unavenged.", "logic": "\nCrannied(christen)\nNaturistic(zachary)\nnot Eucaryotic(guillema)\nforall x (Crannied(x) -> Knotty(x))\nforall x (Planar(x) -> Knotty(x))\nforall x (Knotty(x) -> Planar(x))\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) and not Planar(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Planar(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Insistent(x) and not Planar(x) -> not Unavenged(x))\n\nUnavenged(zachary)\n\nUnavenged(zachary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-318"} {"premises": "Tracey is sextuple. Tracey is azido. Cristabel is marvellous. Cristabel is sextuple. Cristabel is parted. Robert is sextuple. Robert is azido. Robert is divinatory. Sophey is superlunar. Sophey is azido. Green people are marvellous. Nice, marvellous people are superlunar. All marvellous, lengthwise people are divinatory. If someone is marvellous and superlunar then they are divinatory. If Sophey is sextuple then Sophey is divinatory. All parted people are sextuple. All divinatory people are sextuple. If Sophey is superlunar then Sophey is azido. Cristabel is sextuple.", "logic": "\nSextuple(tracey)\nAzido(tracey)\nMarvellous(cristabel)\nSextuple(cristabel)\nParted(cristabel)\nSextuple(robert)\nAzido(robert)\nDivinatory(robert)\nSuperlunar(sophey)\nAzido(sophey)\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Marvellous(x))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) and Marvellous(x) -> Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) and Lengthwise(x) -> Divinatory(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) and Superlunar(x) -> Divinatory(x))\nSextuple(sophey) -> Divinatory(sophey)\nforall x (Parted(x) -> Sextuple(x))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) -> Sextuple(x))\nSuperlunar(sophey) -> Azido(sophey)\n\nSextuple(cristabel)\n\ntherefore Sextuple(cristabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Burgess is bust. Burgess is tantamount. Orren is ravaged. Orren is bust. Orren is hydroxy. Abraham is bust. Abraham is tantamount. Abraham is optic. Ajai is pyknic. Ajai is tantamount. Green people are ravaged. Nice, ravaged people are pyknic. All ravaged, outrageous people are optic. If someone is ravaged and pyknic then they are optic. If Ajai is bust then Ajai is optic. All hydroxy people are bust. All optic people are bust. If Ajai is pyknic then Ajai is tantamount. Burgess is not tantamount.", "logic": "\nBust(burgess)\nTantamount(burgess)\nRavaged(orren)\nBust(orren)\nHydroxy(orren)\nBust(abraham)\nTantamount(abraham)\nOptic(abraham)\nPyknic(ajai)\nTantamount(ajai)\nforall x (Tantamount(x) -> Ravaged(x))\nforall x (Optic(x) and Ravaged(x) -> Pyknic(x))\nforall x (Ravaged(x) and Outrageous(x) -> Optic(x))\nforall x (Ravaged(x) and Pyknic(x) -> Optic(x))\nBust(ajai) -> Optic(ajai)\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Bust(x))\nforall x (Optic(x) -> Bust(x))\nPyknic(ajai) -> Tantamount(ajai)\n\nnot Tantamount(burgess)\n\ntherefore Tantamount(burgess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Michelle is coinciding. Michelle is toothy. Alyda is limpid. Alyda is coinciding. Alyda is wormlike. Kizzee is coinciding. Kizzee is toothy. Kizzee is relocated. Junette is softened. Junette is toothy. Green people are limpid. Nice, limpid people are softened. All limpid, monegasque people are relocated. If someone is limpid and softened then they are relocated. If Junette is coinciding then Junette is relocated. All wormlike people are coinciding. All relocated people are coinciding. If Junette is softened then Junette is toothy. Junette is limpid.", "logic": "\nCoinciding(michelle)\nToothy(michelle)\nLimpid(alyda)\nCoinciding(alyda)\nWormlike(alyda)\nCoinciding(kizzee)\nToothy(kizzee)\nRelocated(kizzee)\nSoftened(junette)\nToothy(junette)\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Limpid(x))\nforall x (Relocated(x) and Limpid(x) -> Softened(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) and Monegasque(x) -> Relocated(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) and Softened(x) -> Relocated(x))\nCoinciding(junette) -> Relocated(junette)\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Coinciding(x))\nforall x (Relocated(x) -> Coinciding(x))\nSoftened(junette) -> Toothy(junette)\n\nLimpid(junette)\n\nToothy(junette) and forall x (Toothy(x) -> Limpid(x)) -> therefore Limpid(junette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Bettie is whitish. Bettie is crossed. Bab is topless. Bab is whitish. Bab is drugless. Corabel is whitish. Corabel is crossed. Corabel is marginal. Markos is glowering. Markos is crossed. Green people are topless. Nice, topless people are glowering. All topless, pandurate people are marginal. If someone is topless and glowering then they are marginal. If Markos is whitish then Markos is marginal. All drugless people are whitish. All marginal people are whitish. If Markos is glowering then Markos is crossed. Markos is not topless.", "logic": "\nWhitish(bettie)\nCrossed(bettie)\nTopless(bab)\nWhitish(bab)\nDrugless(bab)\nWhitish(corabel)\nCrossed(corabel)\nMarginal(corabel)\nGlowering(markos)\nCrossed(markos)\nforall x (Crossed(x) -> Topless(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) and Topless(x) -> Glowering(x))\nforall x (Topless(x) and Pandurate(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Topless(x) and Glowering(x) -> Marginal(x))\nWhitish(markos) -> Marginal(markos)\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Whitish(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) -> Whitish(x))\nGlowering(markos) -> Crossed(markos)\n\nnot Topless(markos)\n\nCrossed(markos) and forall x (Crossed(x) -> Topless(x)) -> therefore Topless(markos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Patrick is cased. Patrick is tenured. Vasily is treacly. Vasily is cased. Vasily is avid. Rab is cased. Rab is tenured. Rab is excessive. Harmonia is catapultic. Harmonia is tenured. Green people are treacly. Nice, treacly people are catapultic. All treacly, sectarian people are excessive. If someone is treacly and catapultic then they are excessive. If Harmonia is cased then Harmonia is excessive. All avid people are cased. All excessive people are cased. If Harmonia is catapultic then Harmonia is tenured. Rab is catapultic.", "logic": "\nCased(patrick)\nTenured(patrick)\nTreacly(vasily)\nCased(vasily)\nAvid(vasily)\nCased(rab)\nTenured(rab)\nExcessive(rab)\nCatapultic(harmonia)\nTenured(harmonia)\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Treacly(x))\nforall x (Excessive(x) and Treacly(x) -> Catapultic(x))\nforall x (Treacly(x) and Sectarian(x) -> Excessive(x))\nforall x (Treacly(x) and Catapultic(x) -> Excessive(x))\nCased(harmonia) -> Excessive(harmonia)\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Cased(x))\nforall x (Excessive(x) -> Cased(x))\nCatapultic(harmonia) -> Tenured(harmonia)\n\nCatapultic(rab)\n\nTenured(rab) and forall x (Tenured(x) -> Treacly(x)) -> therefore Treacly(rab) Excessive(rab) and Treacly(rab) and forall x (Excessive(x) and Treacly(x) -> Catapultic(x)) -> therefore Catapultic(rab)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Levon is inlaid. Levon is starboard. Durante is bound. Durante is inlaid. Durante is permeable. Rebekkah is inlaid. Rebekkah is starboard. Rebekkah is zymoid. Elle is judicial. Elle is starboard. Green people are bound. Nice, bound people are judicial. All bound, filarial people are zymoid. If someone is bound and judicial then they are zymoid. If Elle is inlaid then Elle is zymoid. All permeable people are inlaid. All zymoid people are inlaid. If Elle is judicial then Elle is starboard. Rebekkah is not judicial.", "logic": "\nInlaid(levon)\nStarboard(levon)\nBound(durante)\nInlaid(durante)\nPermeable(durante)\nInlaid(rebekkah)\nStarboard(rebekkah)\nZymoid(rebekkah)\nJudicial(elle)\nStarboard(elle)\nforall x (Starboard(x) -> Bound(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) and Bound(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) and Filarial(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) and Judicial(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nInlaid(elle) -> Zymoid(elle)\nforall x (Permeable(x) -> Inlaid(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Inlaid(x))\nJudicial(elle) -> Starboard(elle)\n\nnot Judicial(rebekkah)\n\nStarboard(rebekkah) and forall x (Starboard(x) -> Bound(x)) -> therefore Bound(rebekkah) Zymoid(rebekkah) and Bound(rebekkah) and forall x (Zymoid(x) and Bound(x) -> Judicial(x)) -> therefore Judicial(rebekkah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Griswold is radiate. Griswold is falconine. Hersch is uncultured. Hersch is radiate. Hersch is indecorous. Stacie is radiate. Stacie is falconine. Stacie is flaunty. Amelina is enteral. Amelina is falconine. Green people are uncultured. Nice, uncultured people are enteral. All uncultured, monoclinal people are flaunty. If someone is uncultured and enteral then they are flaunty. If Amelina is radiate then Amelina is flaunty. All indecorous people are radiate. All flaunty people are radiate. If Amelina is enteral then Amelina is falconine. Amelina is radiate.", "logic": "\nRadiate(griswold)\nFalconine(griswold)\nUncultured(hersch)\nRadiate(hersch)\nIndecorous(hersch)\nRadiate(stacie)\nFalconine(stacie)\nFlaunty(stacie)\nEnteral(amelina)\nFalconine(amelina)\nforall x (Falconine(x) -> Uncultured(x))\nforall x (Flaunty(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Enteral(x))\nforall x (Uncultured(x) and Monoclinal(x) -> Flaunty(x))\nforall x (Uncultured(x) and Enteral(x) -> Flaunty(x))\nRadiate(amelina) -> Flaunty(amelina)\nforall x (Indecorous(x) -> Radiate(x))\nforall x (Flaunty(x) -> Radiate(x))\nEnteral(amelina) -> Falconine(amelina)\n\nRadiate(amelina)\n\nFalconine(amelina) and forall x (Falconine(x) -> Uncultured(x)) -> therefore Uncultured(amelina) Uncultured(amelina) and Enteral(amelina) and forall x (Uncultured(x) and Enteral(x) -> Flaunty(x)) -> therefore Flaunty(amelina) Flaunty(amelina) and forall x (Flaunty(x) -> Radiate(x)) -> therefore Radiate(amelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Phyllida is ridiculous. Phyllida is beguiling. Dorelle is petrifying. Dorelle is ridiculous. Dorelle is lobate. Crysta is ridiculous. Crysta is beguiling. Crysta is brattish. Hamilton is aeriferous. Hamilton is beguiling. Green people are petrifying. Nice, petrifying people are aeriferous. All petrifying, reactive people are brattish. If someone is petrifying and aeriferous then they are brattish. If Hamilton is ridiculous then Hamilton is brattish. All lobate people are ridiculous. All brattish people are ridiculous. If Hamilton is aeriferous then Hamilton is beguiling. Hamilton is not ridiculous.", "logic": "\nRidiculous(phyllida)\nBeguiling(phyllida)\nPetrifying(dorelle)\nRidiculous(dorelle)\nLobate(dorelle)\nRidiculous(crysta)\nBeguiling(crysta)\nBrattish(crysta)\nAeriferous(hamilton)\nBeguiling(hamilton)\nforall x (Beguiling(x) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) and Petrifying(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) and Reactive(x) -> Brattish(x))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) and Aeriferous(x) -> Brattish(x))\nRidiculous(hamilton) -> Brattish(hamilton)\nforall x (Lobate(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nAeriferous(hamilton) -> Beguiling(hamilton)\n\nnot Ridiculous(hamilton)\n\nBeguiling(hamilton) and forall x (Beguiling(x) -> Petrifying(x)) -> therefore Petrifying(hamilton) Petrifying(hamilton) and Aeriferous(hamilton) and forall x (Petrifying(x) and Aeriferous(x) -> Brattish(x)) -> therefore Brattish(hamilton) Brattish(hamilton) and forall x (Brattish(x) -> Ridiculous(x)) -> therefore Ridiculous(hamilton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Sax is cauline. Sax is dogged. Minnie is alular. Minnie is cauline. Minnie is alkaline. Phil is cauline. Phil is dogged. Phil is unsigned. Kimmie is grapy. Kimmie is dogged. Green people are alular. Nice, alular people are grapy. All alular, exocrine people are unsigned. If someone is alular and grapy then they are unsigned. If Kimmie is cauline then Kimmie is unsigned. All alkaline people are cauline. All unsigned people are cauline. If Kimmie is grapy then Kimmie is dogged. Minnie is not grapy.", "logic": "\nCauline(sax)\nDogged(sax)\nAlular(minnie)\nCauline(minnie)\nAlkaline(minnie)\nCauline(phil)\nDogged(phil)\nUnsigned(phil)\nGrapy(kimmie)\nDogged(kimmie)\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Alular(x))\nforall x (Unsigned(x) and Alular(x) -> Grapy(x))\nforall x (Alular(x) and Exocrine(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Alular(x) and Grapy(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nCauline(kimmie) -> Unsigned(kimmie)\nforall x (Alkaline(x) -> Cauline(x))\nforall x (Unsigned(x) -> Cauline(x))\nGrapy(kimmie) -> Dogged(kimmie)\n\nnot Grapy(minnie)\n\nforall x (Unsigned(x) and Alular(x) -> Grapy(x)) <- forall x (Alular(x) and Exocrine(x) -> Unsigned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Stanwood is literary. Stanwood is inert. Wallas is tritanopic. Wallas is literary. Wallas is roast. Krystal is literary. Krystal is inert. Krystal is famous. Romain is bosky. Romain is inert. Green people are tritanopic. Nice, tritanopic people are bosky. All tritanopic, fineable people are famous. If someone is tritanopic and bosky then they are famous. If Romain is literary then Romain is famous. All roast people are literary. All famous people are literary. If Romain is bosky then Romain is inert. Stanwood is bosky.", "logic": "\nLiterary(stanwood)\nInert(stanwood)\nTritanopic(wallas)\nLiterary(wallas)\nRoast(wallas)\nLiterary(krystal)\nInert(krystal)\nFamous(krystal)\nBosky(romain)\nInert(romain)\nforall x (Inert(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) and Tritanopic(x) -> Bosky(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) and Fineable(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) and Bosky(x) -> Famous(x))\nLiterary(romain) -> Famous(romain)\nforall x (Roast(x) -> Literary(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Literary(x))\nBosky(romain) -> Inert(romain)\n\nBosky(stanwood)\n\nforall x (Famous(x) and Tritanopic(x) -> Bosky(x)) <- forall x (Tritanopic(x) and Fineable(x) -> Famous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Susy is congestive. Susy is uncolored. Linell is imperfect. Linell is congestive. Linell is cytologic. Mikel is congestive. Mikel is uncolored. Mikel is moony. Cynthie is neutral. Cynthie is uncolored. Green people are imperfect. Nice, imperfect people are neutral. All imperfect, purblind people are moony. If someone is imperfect and neutral then they are moony. If Cynthie is congestive then Cynthie is moony. All cytologic people are congestive. All moony people are congestive. If Cynthie is neutral then Cynthie is uncolored. Linell is not moony.", "logic": "\nCongestive(susy)\nUncolored(susy)\nImperfect(linell)\nCongestive(linell)\nCytologic(linell)\nCongestive(mikel)\nUncolored(mikel)\nMoony(mikel)\nNeutral(cynthie)\nUncolored(cynthie)\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Moony(x) and Imperfect(x) -> Neutral(x))\nforall x (Imperfect(x) and Purblind(x) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Imperfect(x) and Neutral(x) -> Moony(x))\nCongestive(cynthie) -> Moony(cynthie)\nforall x (Cytologic(x) -> Congestive(x))\nforall x (Moony(x) -> Congestive(x))\nNeutral(cynthie) -> Uncolored(cynthie)\n\nnot Moony(linell)\n\nforall x (Imperfect(x) and Neutral(x) -> Moony(x)) <- forall x (Moony(x) and Imperfect(x) -> Neutral(x)) <- forall x (Imperfect(x) and Purblind(x) -> Moony(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Rosita is moribund. Rosita is estuarine. Jennie is combative. Jennie is moribund. Jennie is iodised. Cassey is moribund. Cassey is estuarine. Cassey is unfirm. Chrissie is luscious. Chrissie is estuarine. Green people are combative. Nice, combative people are luscious. All combative, twee people are unfirm. If someone is combative and luscious then they are unfirm. If Chrissie is moribund then Chrissie is unfirm. All iodised people are moribund. All unfirm people are moribund. If Chrissie is luscious then Chrissie is estuarine. Rosita is unfirm.", "logic": "\nMoribund(rosita)\nEstuarine(rosita)\nCombative(jennie)\nMoribund(jennie)\nIodised(jennie)\nMoribund(cassey)\nEstuarine(cassey)\nUnfirm(cassey)\nLuscious(chrissie)\nEstuarine(chrissie)\nforall x (Estuarine(x) -> Combative(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Combative(x) -> Luscious(x))\nforall x (Combative(x) and Twee(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Combative(x) and Luscious(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nMoribund(chrissie) -> Unfirm(chrissie)\nforall x (Iodised(x) -> Moribund(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Moribund(x))\nLuscious(chrissie) -> Estuarine(chrissie)\n\nUnfirm(rosita)\n\nforall x (Combative(x) and Luscious(x) -> Unfirm(x)) <- forall x (Unfirm(x) and Combative(x) -> Luscious(x)) <- forall x (Combative(x) and Twee(x) -> Unfirm(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Toni is argentic. Toni is elastic. Giralda is daughterly. Giralda is argentic. Giralda is priceless. Jamima is argentic. Jamima is elastic. Jamima is enhancive. Anny is squinty. Anny is elastic. Green people are daughterly. Nice, daughterly people are squinty. All daughterly, wearied people are enhancive. If someone is daughterly and squinty then they are enhancive. If Anny is argentic then Anny is enhancive. All priceless people are argentic. All enhancive people are argentic. If Anny is squinty then Anny is elastic. Toni is not priceless.", "logic": "\nArgentic(toni)\nElastic(toni)\nDaughterly(giralda)\nArgentic(giralda)\nPriceless(giralda)\nArgentic(jamima)\nElastic(jamima)\nEnhancive(jamima)\nSquinty(anny)\nElastic(anny)\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Daughterly(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) and Daughterly(x) -> Squinty(x))\nforall x (Daughterly(x) and Wearied(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Daughterly(x) and Squinty(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nArgentic(anny) -> Enhancive(anny)\nforall x (Priceless(x) -> Argentic(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Argentic(x))\nSquinty(anny) -> Elastic(anny)\n\nnot Priceless(toni)\n\nnot Priceless(toni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Burta is crackers. Burta is ossiculate. Ash is harnessed. Ash is crackers. Ash is crustacean. Phillis is crackers. Phillis is ossiculate. Phillis is posthumous. Marit is gnomic. Marit is ossiculate. Green people are harnessed. Nice, harnessed people are gnomic. All harnessed, unlined people are posthumous. If someone is harnessed and gnomic then they are posthumous. If Marit is crackers then Marit is posthumous. All crustacean people are crackers. All posthumous people are crackers. If Marit is gnomic then Marit is ossiculate. Ash is unlined.", "logic": "\nCrackers(burta)\nOssiculate(burta)\nHarnessed(ash)\nCrackers(ash)\nCrustacean(ash)\nCrackers(phillis)\nOssiculate(phillis)\nPosthumous(phillis)\nGnomic(marit)\nOssiculate(marit)\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Harnessed(x))\nforall x (Posthumous(x) and Harnessed(x) -> Gnomic(x))\nforall x (Harnessed(x) and Unlined(x) -> Posthumous(x))\nforall x (Harnessed(x) and Gnomic(x) -> Posthumous(x))\nCrackers(marit) -> Posthumous(marit)\nforall x (Crustacean(x) -> Crackers(x))\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Crackers(x))\nGnomic(marit) -> Ossiculate(marit)\n\nUnlined(ash)\n\nUnlined(ash) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Rustie is highland. Rustie is urbane. Alonzo is miasmal. Alonzo is highland. Alonzo is thalloid. Brunhilde is highland. Brunhilde is urbane. Brunhilde is linelike. Sondra is steroidal. Sondra is urbane. Green people are miasmal. Nice, miasmal people are steroidal. All miasmal, unreached people are linelike. If someone is miasmal and steroidal then they are linelike. If Sondra is highland then Sondra is linelike. All thalloid people are highland. All linelike people are highland. If Sondra is steroidal then Sondra is urbane. Rustie is not unreached.", "logic": "\nHighland(rustie)\nUrbane(rustie)\nMiasmal(alonzo)\nHighland(alonzo)\nThalloid(alonzo)\nHighland(brunhilde)\nUrbane(brunhilde)\nLinelike(brunhilde)\nSteroidal(sondra)\nUrbane(sondra)\nforall x (Urbane(x) -> Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Linelike(x) and Miasmal(x) -> Steroidal(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Unreached(x) -> Linelike(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Steroidal(x) -> Linelike(x))\nHighland(sondra) -> Linelike(sondra)\nforall x (Thalloid(x) -> Highland(x))\nforall x (Linelike(x) -> Highland(x))\nSteroidal(sondra) -> Urbane(sondra)\n\nnot Unreached(rustie)\n\nnot Unreached(rustie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "August is wooden. August is anodic. Kaari is nonuple. Kaari is wooden. Kaari is antiguan. Liza is wooden. Liza is anodic. Liza is likely. Sunshine is graphic. Sunshine is anodic. Green people are nonuple. Nice, nonuple people are graphic. All nonuple, inguinal people are likely. If someone is nonuple and graphic then they are likely. If Sunshine is wooden then Sunshine is likely. All antiguan people are wooden. All likely people are wooden. If Sunshine is graphic then Sunshine is anodic. Liza is antiguan.", "logic": "\nWooden(august)\nAnodic(august)\nNonuple(kaari)\nWooden(kaari)\nAntiguan(kaari)\nWooden(liza)\nAnodic(liza)\nLikely(liza)\nGraphic(sunshine)\nAnodic(sunshine)\nforall x (Anodic(x) -> Nonuple(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) and Nonuple(x) -> Graphic(x))\nforall x (Nonuple(x) and Inguinal(x) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Nonuple(x) and Graphic(x) -> Likely(x))\nWooden(sunshine) -> Likely(sunshine)\nforall x (Antiguan(x) -> Wooden(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Wooden(x))\nGraphic(sunshine) -> Anodic(sunshine)\n\nAntiguan(liza)\n\nAntiguan(liza) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "Elenore is forged. Elenore is bisontine. Elenore is lengthwise. Elenore is winsome. Elenore is biaxal. Elenore is permeable. Elenore is aberdonian. Layney is forged. Layney is bisontine. Layney is lengthwise. Layney is permeable. Layney is aberdonian. White things are winsome. Furry, permeable things are winsome. If Layney is biaxal and Layney is bisontine then Layney is lengthwise. Round, bisontine things are lengthwise. Green, permeable things are forged. If something is winsome and bisontine then it is biaxal. Elenore is forged.", "logic": "\nForged(elenore)\nBisontine(elenore)\nLengthwise(elenore)\nWinsome(elenore)\nBiaxal(elenore)\nPermeable(elenore)\nAberdonian(elenore)\nForged(layney)\nBisontine(layney)\nLengthwise(layney)\nPermeable(layney)\nAberdonian(layney)\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Forged(x) and Permeable(x) -> Winsome(x))\nBiaxal(layney) and Bisontine(layney) -> Lengthwise(layney)\nforall x (Biaxal(x) and Bisontine(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) and Permeable(x) -> Forged(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Bisontine(x) -> Biaxal(x))\n\nForged(elenore)\n\ntherefore Forged(elenore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Joab is interstate. Joab is lapidarian. Joab is opaline. Joab is dendroid. Joab is frontmost. Joab is cornish. Joab is cruciate. Avery is interstate. Avery is lapidarian. Avery is opaline. Avery is cornish. Avery is cruciate. White things are dendroid. Furry, cornish things are dendroid. If Avery is frontmost and Avery is lapidarian then Avery is opaline. Round, lapidarian things are opaline. Green, cornish things are interstate. If something is dendroid and lapidarian then it is frontmost. Avery is not cornish.", "logic": "\nInterstate(joab)\nLapidarian(joab)\nOpaline(joab)\nDendroid(joab)\nFrontmost(joab)\nCornish(joab)\nCruciate(joab)\nInterstate(avery)\nLapidarian(avery)\nOpaline(avery)\nCornish(avery)\nCruciate(avery)\nforall x (Cruciate(x) -> Dendroid(x))\nforall x (Interstate(x) and Cornish(x) -> Dendroid(x))\nFrontmost(avery) and Lapidarian(avery) -> Opaline(avery)\nforall x (Frontmost(x) and Lapidarian(x) -> Opaline(x))\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) and Cornish(x) -> Interstate(x))\nforall x (Dendroid(x) and Lapidarian(x) -> Frontmost(x))\n\nnot Cornish(avery)\n\ntherefore Cornish(avery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Joni is bodied. Joni is flakey. Joni is inshore. Joni is bulbar. Joni is quartzose. Joni is aneurismal. Joni is hypnagogic. Marcie is bodied. Marcie is flakey. Marcie is inshore. Marcie is aneurismal. Marcie is hypnagogic. White things are bulbar. Furry, aneurismal things are bulbar. If Marcie is quartzose and Marcie is flakey then Marcie is inshore. Round, flakey things are inshore. Green, aneurismal things are bodied. If something is bulbar and flakey then it is quartzose. Marcie is bulbar.", "logic": "\nBodied(joni)\nFlakey(joni)\nInshore(joni)\nBulbar(joni)\nQuartzose(joni)\nAneurismal(joni)\nHypnagogic(joni)\nBodied(marcie)\nFlakey(marcie)\nInshore(marcie)\nAneurismal(marcie)\nHypnagogic(marcie)\nforall x (Hypnagogic(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Bodied(x) and Aneurismal(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nQuartzose(marcie) and Flakey(marcie) -> Inshore(marcie)\nforall x (Quartzose(x) and Flakey(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Flakey(x) and Aneurismal(x) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Bulbar(x) and Flakey(x) -> Quartzose(x))\n\nBulbar(marcie)\n\nHypnagogic(marcie) and forall x (Hypnagogic(x) -> Bulbar(x)) -> therefore Bulbar(marcie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Bartlet is jumpy. Bartlet is overdone. Bartlet is bonelike. Bartlet is scots. Bartlet is darkening. Bartlet is palmy. Bartlet is cespitose. Thorstein is jumpy. Thorstein is overdone. Thorstein is bonelike. Thorstein is palmy. Thorstein is cespitose. White things are scots. Furry, palmy things are scots. If Thorstein is darkening and Thorstein is overdone then Thorstein is bonelike. Round, overdone things are bonelike. Green, palmy things are jumpy. If something is scots and overdone then it is darkening. Thorstein is not scots.", "logic": "\nJumpy(bartlet)\nOverdone(bartlet)\nBonelike(bartlet)\nScots(bartlet)\nDarkening(bartlet)\nPalmy(bartlet)\nCespitose(bartlet)\nJumpy(thorstein)\nOverdone(thorstein)\nBonelike(thorstein)\nPalmy(thorstein)\nCespitose(thorstein)\nforall x (Cespitose(x) -> Scots(x))\nforall x (Jumpy(x) and Palmy(x) -> Scots(x))\nDarkening(thorstein) and Overdone(thorstein) -> Bonelike(thorstein)\nforall x (Darkening(x) and Overdone(x) -> Bonelike(x))\nforall x (Overdone(x) and Palmy(x) -> Jumpy(x))\nforall x (Scots(x) and Overdone(x) -> Darkening(x))\n\nnot Scots(thorstein)\n\nCespitose(thorstein) and forall x (Cespitose(x) -> Scots(x)) -> therefore Scots(thorstein)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Susi is sublunary. Susi is unposed. Susi is summery. Susi is whispered. Susi is genitive. Susi is spacey. Susi is sinhalese. Hal is sublunary. Hal is unposed. Hal is summery. Hal is spacey. Hal is sinhalese. White things are whispered. Furry, spacey things are whispered. If Hal is genitive and Hal is unposed then Hal is summery. Round, unposed things are summery. Green, spacey things are sublunary. If something is whispered and unposed then it is genitive. Hal is genitive.", "logic": "\nSublunary(susi)\nUnposed(susi)\nSummery(susi)\nWhispered(susi)\nGenitive(susi)\nSpacey(susi)\nSinhalese(susi)\nSublunary(hal)\nUnposed(hal)\nSummery(hal)\nSpacey(hal)\nSinhalese(hal)\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) -> Whispered(x))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) and Spacey(x) -> Whispered(x))\nGenitive(hal) and Unposed(hal) -> Summery(hal)\nforall x (Genitive(x) and Unposed(x) -> Summery(x))\nforall x (Unposed(x) and Spacey(x) -> Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Whispered(x) and Unposed(x) -> Genitive(x))\n\nGenitive(hal)\n\nSinhalese(hal) and forall x (Sinhalese(x) -> Whispered(x)) -> therefore Whispered(hal) Whispered(hal) and Unposed(hal) and forall x (Whispered(x) and Unposed(x) -> Genitive(x)) -> therefore Genitive(hal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Caroleen is blonde. Caroleen is slithery. Caroleen is damned. Caroleen is swampy. Caroleen is isometric. Caroleen is besieged. Caroleen is saturnine. Brana is blonde. Brana is slithery. Brana is damned. Brana is besieged. Brana is saturnine. White things are swampy. Furry, besieged things are swampy. If Brana is isometric and Brana is slithery then Brana is damned. Round, slithery things are damned. Green, besieged things are blonde. If something is swampy and slithery then it is isometric. Brana is not isometric.", "logic": "\nBlonde(caroleen)\nSlithery(caroleen)\nDamned(caroleen)\nSwampy(caroleen)\nIsometric(caroleen)\nBesieged(caroleen)\nSaturnine(caroleen)\nBlonde(brana)\nSlithery(brana)\nDamned(brana)\nBesieged(brana)\nSaturnine(brana)\nforall x (Saturnine(x) -> Swampy(x))\nforall x (Blonde(x) and Besieged(x) -> Swampy(x))\nIsometric(brana) and Slithery(brana) -> Damned(brana)\nforall x (Isometric(x) and Slithery(x) -> Damned(x))\nforall x (Slithery(x) and Besieged(x) -> Blonde(x))\nforall x (Swampy(x) and Slithery(x) -> Isometric(x))\n\nnot Isometric(brana)\n\nSaturnine(brana) and forall x (Saturnine(x) -> Swampy(x)) -> therefore Swampy(brana) Swampy(brana) and Slithery(brana) and forall x (Swampy(x) and Slithery(x) -> Isometric(x)) -> therefore Isometric(brana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1370"} {"premises": "Junie is not faceless. Carmina is pyloric. Carmina is glandular. Carmina is not zealous. Carmina is smothered. Carmina is not unfathomed. Carmina is unknown. Ismail is unfathomed. Ophelie is faceless. Ophelie is glandular. All glandular, zealous things are smothered. If something is unfathomed and not glandular then it is not smothered. All smothered, zealous things are pyloric. All unfathomed, glandular things are faceless. All faceless things are zealous. If something is unfathomed then it is not zealous. Carmina is smothered.", "logic": "\nnot Faceless(junie)\nPyloric(carmina)\nGlandular(carmina)\nnot Zealous(carmina)\nSmothered(carmina)\nnot Unfathomed(carmina)\nUnknown(carmina)\nUnfathomed(ismail)\nFaceless(ophelie)\nGlandular(ophelie)\nforall x (Glandular(x) and Zealous(x) -> Smothered(x))\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) and not Glandular(x) -> not Smothered(x))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and Zealous(x) -> Pyloric(x))\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) and Glandular(x) -> Faceless(x))\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Zealous(x))\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> not Zealous(x))\n\nSmothered(carmina)\n\ntherefore Smothered(carmina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Gunvor is not anatomical. Charlotta is sculptured. Charlotta is rainproof. Charlotta is not guardant. Charlotta is naughty. Charlotta is not cubic. Charlotta is united. Leonidas is cubic. Calley is anatomical. Calley is rainproof. All rainproof, guardant things are naughty. If something is cubic and not rainproof then it is not naughty. All naughty, guardant things are sculptured. All cubic, rainproof things are anatomical. All anatomical things are guardant. If something is cubic then it is not guardant. Calley is not rainproof.", "logic": "\nnot Anatomical(gunvor)\nSculptured(charlotta)\nRainproof(charlotta)\nnot Guardant(charlotta)\nNaughty(charlotta)\nnot Cubic(charlotta)\nUnited(charlotta)\nCubic(leonidas)\nAnatomical(calley)\nRainproof(calley)\nforall x (Rainproof(x) and Guardant(x) -> Naughty(x))\nforall x (Cubic(x) and not Rainproof(x) -> not Naughty(x))\nforall x (Naughty(x) and Guardant(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Cubic(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Anatomical(x))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Cubic(x) -> not Guardant(x))\n\nnot Rainproof(calley)\n\ntherefore Rainproof(calley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Heddie is not calcic. Townie is inst. Townie is unintended. Townie is not fulgurous. Townie is woven. Townie is not phrasal. Townie is acquitted. Caryn is phrasal. Inglebert is calcic. Inglebert is unintended. All unintended, fulgurous things are woven. If something is phrasal and not unintended then it is not woven. All woven, fulgurous things are inst. All phrasal, unintended things are calcic. All calcic things are fulgurous. If something is phrasal then it is not fulgurous. Inglebert is fulgurous.", "logic": "\nnot Calcic(heddie)\nInst(townie)\nUnintended(townie)\nnot Fulgurous(townie)\nWoven(townie)\nnot Phrasal(townie)\nAcquitted(townie)\nPhrasal(caryn)\nCalcic(inglebert)\nUnintended(inglebert)\nforall x (Unintended(x) and Fulgurous(x) -> Woven(x))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) and not Unintended(x) -> not Woven(x))\nforall x (Woven(x) and Fulgurous(x) -> Inst(x))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) and Unintended(x) -> Calcic(x))\nforall x (Calcic(x) -> Fulgurous(x))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) -> not Fulgurous(x))\n\nFulgurous(inglebert)\n\nCalcic(inglebert) and forall x (Calcic(x) -> Fulgurous(x)) -> therefore Fulgurous(inglebert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Eben is not evanescent. Hadria is javanese. Hadria is goaded. Hadria is not cranial. Hadria is passionate. Hadria is not acid. Hadria is eugenic. Sylvan is acid. Joane is evanescent. Joane is goaded. All goaded, cranial things are passionate. If something is acid and not goaded then it is not passionate. All passionate, cranial things are javanese. All acid, goaded things are evanescent. All evanescent things are cranial. If something is acid then it is not cranial. Joane is not cranial.", "logic": "\nnot Evanescent(eben)\nJavanese(hadria)\nGoaded(hadria)\nnot Cranial(hadria)\nPassionate(hadria)\nnot Acid(hadria)\nEugenic(hadria)\nAcid(sylvan)\nEvanescent(joane)\nGoaded(joane)\nforall x (Goaded(x) and Cranial(x) -> Passionate(x))\nforall x (Acid(x) and not Goaded(x) -> not Passionate(x))\nforall x (Passionate(x) and Cranial(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Acid(x) and Goaded(x) -> Evanescent(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Acid(x) -> not Cranial(x))\n\nnot Cranial(joane)\n\nEvanescent(joane) and forall x (Evanescent(x) -> Cranial(x)) -> therefore Cranial(joane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Sybilla is not unglazed. Wilek is nonliving. Wilek is sebaceous. Wilek is not pennate. Wilek is lacteal. Wilek is not sown. Wilek is umbellar. Andres is sown. Fergus is unglazed. Fergus is sebaceous. All sebaceous, pennate things are lacteal. If something is sown and not sebaceous then it is not lacteal. All lacteal, pennate things are nonliving. All sown, sebaceous things are unglazed. All unglazed things are pennate. If something is sown then it is not pennate. Fergus is lacteal.", "logic": "\nnot Unglazed(sybilla)\nNonliving(wilek)\nSebaceous(wilek)\nnot Pennate(wilek)\nLacteal(wilek)\nnot Sown(wilek)\nUmbellar(wilek)\nSown(andres)\nUnglazed(fergus)\nSebaceous(fergus)\nforall x (Sebaceous(x) and Pennate(x) -> Lacteal(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) and not Sebaceous(x) -> not Lacteal(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Pennate(x) -> Nonliving(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) and Sebaceous(x) -> Unglazed(x))\nforall x (Unglazed(x) -> Pennate(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) -> not Pennate(x))\n\nLacteal(fergus)\n\nUnglazed(fergus) and forall x (Unglazed(x) -> Pennate(x)) -> therefore Pennate(fergus) Sebaceous(fergus) and Pennate(fergus) and forall x (Sebaceous(x) and Pennate(x) -> Lacteal(x)) -> therefore Lacteal(fergus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Eliza is not triumphal. Thurstan is prudential. Thurstan is straplike. Thurstan is not unratable. Thurstan is nipponese. Thurstan is not uncrowded. Thurstan is subfusc. Hartwell is uncrowded. Barn is triumphal. Barn is straplike. All straplike, unratable things are nipponese. If something is uncrowded and not straplike then it is not nipponese. All nipponese, unratable things are prudential. All uncrowded, straplike things are triumphal. All triumphal things are unratable. If something is uncrowded then it is not unratable. Barn is not nipponese.", "logic": "\nnot Triumphal(eliza)\nPrudential(thurstan)\nStraplike(thurstan)\nnot Unratable(thurstan)\nNipponese(thurstan)\nnot Uncrowded(thurstan)\nSubfusc(thurstan)\nUncrowded(hartwell)\nTriumphal(barn)\nStraplike(barn)\nforall x (Straplike(x) and Unratable(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) and not Straplike(x) -> not Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Nipponese(x) and Unratable(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) and Straplike(x) -> Triumphal(x))\nforall x (Triumphal(x) -> Unratable(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) -> not Unratable(x))\n\nnot Nipponese(barn)\n\nTriumphal(barn) and forall x (Triumphal(x) -> Unratable(x)) -> therefore Unratable(barn) Straplike(barn) and Unratable(barn) and forall x (Straplike(x) and Unratable(x) -> Nipponese(x)) -> therefore Nipponese(barn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Morley is not oscitant. Ardys is fordable. Ardys is unmanlike. Ardys is not transpolar. Ardys is inductive. Ardys is not merged. Ardys is spiky. Aliza is merged. Dena is oscitant. Dena is unmanlike. All unmanlike, transpolar things are inductive. If something is merged and not unmanlike then it is not inductive. All inductive, transpolar things are fordable. All merged, unmanlike things are oscitant. All oscitant things are transpolar. If something is merged then it is not transpolar. Dena is fordable.", "logic": "\nnot Oscitant(morley)\nFordable(ardys)\nUnmanlike(ardys)\nnot Transpolar(ardys)\nInductive(ardys)\nnot Merged(ardys)\nSpiky(ardys)\nMerged(aliza)\nOscitant(dena)\nUnmanlike(dena)\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Inductive(x))\nforall x (Merged(x) and not Unmanlike(x) -> not Inductive(x))\nforall x (Inductive(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Fordable(x))\nforall x (Merged(x) and Unmanlike(x) -> Oscitant(x))\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Transpolar(x))\nforall x (Merged(x) -> not Transpolar(x))\n\nFordable(dena)\n\nOscitant(dena) and forall x (Oscitant(x) -> Transpolar(x)) -> therefore Transpolar(dena) Unmanlike(dena) and Transpolar(dena) and forall x (Unmanlike(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Inductive(x)) -> therefore Inductive(dena) Oscitant(dena) and forall x (Oscitant(x) -> Transpolar(x)) -> therefore Transpolar(dena) Inductive(dena) and Transpolar(dena) and forall x (Inductive(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Fordable(x)) -> therefore Fordable(dena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Breanne is not falling. Almeria is aghast. Almeria is mincing. Almeria is not unbalanced. Almeria is remaining. Almeria is not limacoid. Almeria is unhopeful. Anatollo is limacoid. Marshall is falling. Marshall is mincing. All mincing, unbalanced things are remaining. If something is limacoid and not mincing then it is not remaining. All remaining, unbalanced things are aghast. All limacoid, mincing things are falling. All falling things are unbalanced. If something is limacoid then it is not unbalanced. Marshall is not aghast.", "logic": "\nnot Falling(breanne)\nAghast(almeria)\nMincing(almeria)\nnot Unbalanced(almeria)\nRemaining(almeria)\nnot Limacoid(almeria)\nUnhopeful(almeria)\nLimacoid(anatollo)\nFalling(marshall)\nMincing(marshall)\nforall x (Mincing(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Remaining(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) and not Mincing(x) -> not Remaining(x))\nforall x (Remaining(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) and Mincing(x) -> Falling(x))\nforall x (Falling(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Limacoid(x) -> not Unbalanced(x))\n\nnot Aghast(marshall)\n\nFalling(marshall) and forall x (Falling(x) -> Unbalanced(x)) -> therefore Unbalanced(marshall) Mincing(marshall) and Unbalanced(marshall) and forall x (Mincing(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Remaining(x)) -> therefore Remaining(marshall) Falling(marshall) and forall x (Falling(x) -> Unbalanced(x)) -> therefore Unbalanced(marshall) Remaining(marshall) and Unbalanced(marshall) and forall x (Remaining(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Aghast(x)) -> therefore Aghast(marshall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Guillermo is not antennal. Lilas is myelinated. Lilas is chartless. Lilas is not unquotable. Lilas is lined. Lilas is not descending. Lilas is rhomboid. Melisent is descending. Carola is antennal. Carola is chartless. All chartless, unquotable things are lined. If something is descending and not chartless then it is not lined. All lined, unquotable things are myelinated. All descending, chartless things are antennal. All antennal things are unquotable. If something is descending then it is not unquotable. Melisent is not myelinated.", "logic": "\nnot Antennal(guillermo)\nMyelinated(lilas)\nChartless(lilas)\nnot Unquotable(lilas)\nLined(lilas)\nnot Descending(lilas)\nRhomboid(lilas)\nDescending(melisent)\nAntennal(carola)\nChartless(carola)\nforall x (Chartless(x) and Unquotable(x) -> Lined(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) and not Chartless(x) -> not Lined(x))\nforall x (Lined(x) and Unquotable(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) and Chartless(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Antennal(x) -> Unquotable(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) -> not Unquotable(x))\n\nnot Myelinated(melisent)\n\nforall x (Lined(x) and Unquotable(x) -> Myelinated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Sax is not sanitized. Clarice is mozartian. Clarice is unmalted. Clarice is not fabled. Clarice is raiseable. Clarice is not impassive. Clarice is arresting. Oralla is impassive. Selma is sanitized. Selma is unmalted. All unmalted, fabled things are raiseable. If something is impassive and not unmalted then it is not raiseable. All raiseable, fabled things are mozartian. All impassive, unmalted things are sanitized. All sanitized things are fabled. If something is impassive then it is not fabled. Clarice is sanitized.", "logic": "\nnot Sanitized(sax)\nMozartian(clarice)\nUnmalted(clarice)\nnot Fabled(clarice)\nRaiseable(clarice)\nnot Impassive(clarice)\nArresting(clarice)\nImpassive(oralla)\nSanitized(selma)\nUnmalted(selma)\nforall x (Unmalted(x) and Fabled(x) -> Raiseable(x))\nforall x (Impassive(x) and not Unmalted(x) -> not Raiseable(x))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) and Fabled(x) -> Mozartian(x))\nforall x (Impassive(x) and Unmalted(x) -> Sanitized(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) -> Fabled(x))\nforall x (Impassive(x) -> not Fabled(x))\n\nSanitized(clarice)\n\nforall x (Impassive(x) and Unmalted(x) -> Sanitized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Roderic is not foamy. Katharine is unkept. Katharine is nauseating. Katharine is not waking. Katharine is effete. Katharine is not repentant. Katharine is stern. Siana is repentant. Rik is foamy. Rik is nauseating. All nauseating, waking things are effete. If something is repentant and not nauseating then it is not effete. All effete, waking things are unkept. All repentant, nauseating things are foamy. All foamy things are waking. If something is repentant then it is not waking. Roderic is not waking.", "logic": "\nnot Foamy(roderic)\nUnkept(katharine)\nNauseating(katharine)\nnot Waking(katharine)\nEffete(katharine)\nnot Repentant(katharine)\nStern(katharine)\nRepentant(siana)\nFoamy(rik)\nNauseating(rik)\nforall x (Nauseating(x) and Waking(x) -> Effete(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) and not Nauseating(x) -> not Effete(x))\nforall x (Effete(x) and Waking(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) and Nauseating(x) -> Foamy(x))\nforall x (Foamy(x) -> Waking(x))\nforall x (Repentant(x) -> not Waking(x))\n\nnot Waking(roderic)\n\nforall x (Foamy(x) -> Waking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Kelsi is not pessimum. Kaylil is decisive. Kaylil is geared. Kaylil is not gregarious. Kaylil is despoiled. Kaylil is not eastmost. Kaylil is buzzing. Parrnell is eastmost. Nonie is pessimum. Nonie is geared. All geared, gregarious things are despoiled. If something is eastmost and not geared then it is not despoiled. All despoiled, gregarious things are decisive. All eastmost, geared things are pessimum. All pessimum things are gregarious. If something is eastmost then it is not gregarious. Kelsi is despoiled.", "logic": "\nnot Pessimum(kelsi)\nDecisive(kaylil)\nGeared(kaylil)\nnot Gregarious(kaylil)\nDespoiled(kaylil)\nnot Eastmost(kaylil)\nBuzzing(kaylil)\nEastmost(parrnell)\nPessimum(nonie)\nGeared(nonie)\nforall x (Geared(x) and Gregarious(x) -> Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) and not Geared(x) -> not Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Despoiled(x) and Gregarious(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) and Geared(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> not Gregarious(x))\n\nDespoiled(kelsi)\n\nforall x (Geared(x) and Gregarious(x) -> Despoiled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Arlina is not reducible. Giana is gaping. Giana is parametric. Giana is not irregular. Giana is weeny. Giana is not illative. Giana is chelated. Marion is illative. Colleen is reducible. Colleen is parametric. All parametric, irregular things are weeny. If something is illative and not parametric then it is not weeny. All weeny, irregular things are gaping. All illative, parametric things are reducible. All reducible things are irregular. If something is illative then it is not irregular. Arlina is not chelated.", "logic": "\nnot Reducible(arlina)\nGaping(giana)\nParametric(giana)\nnot Irregular(giana)\nWeeny(giana)\nnot Illative(giana)\nChelated(giana)\nIllative(marion)\nReducible(colleen)\nParametric(colleen)\nforall x (Parametric(x) and Irregular(x) -> Weeny(x))\nforall x (Illative(x) and not Parametric(x) -> not Weeny(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) and Irregular(x) -> Gaping(x))\nforall x (Illative(x) and Parametric(x) -> Reducible(x))\nforall x (Reducible(x) -> Irregular(x))\nforall x (Illative(x) -> not Irregular(x))\n\nnot Chelated(arlina)\n\nnot Chelated(arlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Celestia is not binucleate. Tiertza is curable. Tiertza is purulent. Tiertza is not bitchy. Tiertza is unwilling. Tiertza is not mutant. Tiertza is curricular. Denis is mutant. Jaclyn is binucleate. Jaclyn is purulent. All purulent, bitchy things are unwilling. If something is mutant and not purulent then it is not unwilling. All unwilling, bitchy things are curable. All mutant, purulent things are binucleate. All binucleate things are bitchy. If something is mutant then it is not bitchy. Jaclyn is curricular.", "logic": "\nnot Binucleate(celestia)\nCurable(tiertza)\nPurulent(tiertza)\nnot Bitchy(tiertza)\nUnwilling(tiertza)\nnot Mutant(tiertza)\nCurricular(tiertza)\nMutant(denis)\nBinucleate(jaclyn)\nPurulent(jaclyn)\nforall x (Purulent(x) and Bitchy(x) -> Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Mutant(x) and not Purulent(x) -> not Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and Bitchy(x) -> Curable(x))\nforall x (Mutant(x) and Purulent(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> not Bitchy(x))\n\nCurricular(jaclyn)\n\nCurricular(jaclyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Charley is not unmelodic. Jeraldine is twilit. Jeraldine is refractive. Jeraldine is not dominated. Jeraldine is leading. Jeraldine is not outlined. Jeraldine is smooth. Vitia is outlined. Gunilla is unmelodic. Gunilla is refractive. All refractive, dominated things are leading. If something is outlined and not refractive then it is not leading. All leading, dominated things are twilit. All outlined, refractive things are unmelodic. All unmelodic things are dominated. If something is outlined then it is not dominated. Vitia is not refractive.", "logic": "\nnot Unmelodic(charley)\nTwilit(jeraldine)\nRefractive(jeraldine)\nnot Dominated(jeraldine)\nLeading(jeraldine)\nnot Outlined(jeraldine)\nSmooth(jeraldine)\nOutlined(vitia)\nUnmelodic(gunilla)\nRefractive(gunilla)\nforall x (Refractive(x) and Dominated(x) -> Leading(x))\nforall x (Outlined(x) and not Refractive(x) -> not Leading(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) and Dominated(x) -> Twilit(x))\nforall x (Outlined(x) and Refractive(x) -> Unmelodic(x))\nforall x (Unmelodic(x) -> Dominated(x))\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> not Dominated(x))\n\nnot Refractive(vitia)\n\nnot Refractive(vitia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Zorah is not wary. Petr is careworn. Petr is painless. Petr is not marvelous. Petr is depletable. Petr is not parisian. Petr is utmost. Geraldo is parisian. Ruthanne is wary. Ruthanne is painless. All painless, marvelous things are depletable. If something is parisian and not painless then it is not depletable. All depletable, marvelous things are careworn. All parisian, painless things are wary. All wary things are marvelous. If something is parisian then it is not marvelous. Geraldo is utmost.", "logic": "\nnot Wary(zorah)\nCareworn(petr)\nPainless(petr)\nnot Marvelous(petr)\nDepletable(petr)\nnot Parisian(petr)\nUtmost(petr)\nParisian(geraldo)\nWary(ruthanne)\nPainless(ruthanne)\nforall x (Painless(x) and Marvelous(x) -> Depletable(x))\nforall x (Parisian(x) and not Painless(x) -> not Depletable(x))\nforall x (Depletable(x) and Marvelous(x) -> Careworn(x))\nforall x (Parisian(x) and Painless(x) -> Wary(x))\nforall x (Wary(x) -> Marvelous(x))\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> not Marvelous(x))\n\nUtmost(geraldo)\n\nUtmost(geraldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-252"} {"premises": "Kikelia is snobby. Kikelia is crappy. Kikelia is serial. Kikelia is monodic. Kikelia is areolar. Maryrose is unaccepted. Maryrose is crappy. Maryrose is not monodic. Maryrose is areolar. Wyndham is snobby. Wyndham is crappy. Wyndham is riming. Wyndham is areolar. Elyn is crappy. Elyn is monodic. If Kikelia is riming and Kikelia is serial then Kikelia is crappy. White things are snobby. If Elyn is riming and Elyn is areolar then Elyn is unaccepted. All snobby things are serial. If Kikelia is serial and Kikelia is snobby then Kikelia is unaccepted. Blue things are riming. Wyndham is areolar.", "logic": "\nSnobby(kikelia)\nCrappy(kikelia)\nSerial(kikelia)\nMonodic(kikelia)\nAreolar(kikelia)\nUnaccepted(maryrose)\nCrappy(maryrose)\nnot Monodic(maryrose)\nAreolar(maryrose)\nSnobby(wyndham)\nCrappy(wyndham)\nRiming(wyndham)\nAreolar(wyndham)\nCrappy(elyn)\nMonodic(elyn)\nRiming(kikelia) and Serial(kikelia) -> Crappy(kikelia)\nforall x (Monodic(x) -> Snobby(x))\nRiming(elyn) and Areolar(elyn) -> Unaccepted(elyn)\nforall x (Snobby(x) -> Serial(x))\nSerial(kikelia) and Snobby(kikelia) -> Unaccepted(kikelia)\nforall x (Snobby(x) -> Riming(x))\n\nAreolar(wyndham)\n\ntherefore Areolar(wyndham)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Dolly is uncritical. Dolly is subaqueous. Dolly is beatified. Dolly is mortal. Dolly is terrifying. Windy is batrachian. Windy is subaqueous. Windy is not mortal. Windy is terrifying. Lily is uncritical. Lily is subaqueous. Lily is fried. Lily is terrifying. Zelma is subaqueous. Zelma is mortal. If Dolly is fried and Dolly is beatified then Dolly is subaqueous. White things are uncritical. If Zelma is fried and Zelma is terrifying then Zelma is batrachian. All uncritical things are beatified. If Dolly is beatified and Dolly is uncritical then Dolly is batrachian. Blue things are fried. Lily is not fried.", "logic": "\nUncritical(dolly)\nSubaqueous(dolly)\nBeatified(dolly)\nMortal(dolly)\nTerrifying(dolly)\nBatrachian(windy)\nSubaqueous(windy)\nnot Mortal(windy)\nTerrifying(windy)\nUncritical(lily)\nSubaqueous(lily)\nFried(lily)\nTerrifying(lily)\nSubaqueous(zelma)\nMortal(zelma)\nFried(dolly) and Beatified(dolly) -> Subaqueous(dolly)\nforall x (Mortal(x) -> Uncritical(x))\nFried(zelma) and Terrifying(zelma) -> Batrachian(zelma)\nforall x (Uncritical(x) -> Beatified(x))\nBeatified(dolly) and Uncritical(dolly) -> Batrachian(dolly)\nforall x (Uncritical(x) -> Fried(x))\n\nnot Fried(lily)\n\ntherefore Fried(lily)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Partha is stockinged. Partha is stomachic. Partha is lowering. Partha is rueful. Partha is miasmal. Sharron is penal. Sharron is stomachic. Sharron is not rueful. Sharron is miasmal. Morlee is stockinged. Morlee is stomachic. Morlee is straplike. Morlee is miasmal. Angelika is stomachic. Angelika is rueful. If Partha is straplike and Partha is lowering then Partha is stomachic. White things are stockinged. If Angelika is straplike and Angelika is miasmal then Angelika is penal. All stockinged things are lowering. If Partha is lowering and Partha is stockinged then Partha is penal. Blue things are straplike. Morlee is lowering.", "logic": "\nStockinged(partha)\nStomachic(partha)\nLowering(partha)\nRueful(partha)\nMiasmal(partha)\nPenal(sharron)\nStomachic(sharron)\nnot Rueful(sharron)\nMiasmal(sharron)\nStockinged(morlee)\nStomachic(morlee)\nStraplike(morlee)\nMiasmal(morlee)\nStomachic(angelika)\nRueful(angelika)\nStraplike(partha) and Lowering(partha) -> Stomachic(partha)\nforall x (Rueful(x) -> Stockinged(x))\nStraplike(angelika) and Miasmal(angelika) -> Penal(angelika)\nforall x (Stockinged(x) -> Lowering(x))\nLowering(partha) and Stockinged(partha) -> Penal(partha)\nforall x (Stockinged(x) -> Straplike(x))\n\nLowering(morlee)\n\nStockinged(morlee) and forall x (Stockinged(x) -> Lowering(x)) -> therefore Lowering(morlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Joni is flocculent. Joni is fruticose. Joni is philistine. Joni is loose. Joni is foreboding. Keenan is chestnut. Keenan is fruticose. Keenan is not loose. Keenan is foreboding. Jeffry is flocculent. Jeffry is fruticose. Jeffry is vernacular. Jeffry is foreboding. Pammie is fruticose. Pammie is loose. If Joni is vernacular and Joni is philistine then Joni is fruticose. White things are flocculent. If Pammie is vernacular and Pammie is foreboding then Pammie is chestnut. All flocculent things are philistine. If Joni is philistine and Joni is flocculent then Joni is chestnut. Blue things are vernacular. Joni is not chestnut.", "logic": "\nFlocculent(joni)\nFruticose(joni)\nPhilistine(joni)\nLoose(joni)\nForeboding(joni)\nChestnut(keenan)\nFruticose(keenan)\nnot Loose(keenan)\nForeboding(keenan)\nFlocculent(jeffry)\nFruticose(jeffry)\nVernacular(jeffry)\nForeboding(jeffry)\nFruticose(pammie)\nLoose(pammie)\nVernacular(joni) and Philistine(joni) -> Fruticose(joni)\nforall x (Loose(x) -> Flocculent(x))\nVernacular(pammie) and Foreboding(pammie) -> Chestnut(pammie)\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Philistine(x))\nPhilistine(joni) and Flocculent(joni) -> Chestnut(joni)\nforall x (Flocculent(x) -> Vernacular(x))\n\nnot Chestnut(joni)\n\nPhilistine(joni) and Flocculent(joni) and Philistine(joni) and Flocculent(joni) -> Chestnut(joni) -> therefore Chestnut(joni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Vanya is lucky. Vanya is important. Vanya is nonsense. Vanya is telluric. Vanya is chlorotic. Wendel is stomatous. Wendel is important. Wendel is not telluric. Wendel is chlorotic. Kordula is lucky. Kordula is important. Kordula is pinnated. Kordula is chlorotic. Beret is important. Beret is telluric. If Vanya is pinnated and Vanya is nonsense then Vanya is important. White things are lucky. If Beret is pinnated and Beret is chlorotic then Beret is stomatous. All lucky things are nonsense. If Vanya is nonsense and Vanya is lucky then Vanya is stomatous. Blue things are pinnated. Beret is nonsense.", "logic": "\nLucky(vanya)\nImportant(vanya)\nNonsense(vanya)\nTelluric(vanya)\nChlorotic(vanya)\nStomatous(wendel)\nImportant(wendel)\nnot Telluric(wendel)\nChlorotic(wendel)\nLucky(kordula)\nImportant(kordula)\nPinnated(kordula)\nChlorotic(kordula)\nImportant(beret)\nTelluric(beret)\nPinnated(vanya) and Nonsense(vanya) -> Important(vanya)\nforall x (Telluric(x) -> Lucky(x))\nPinnated(beret) and Chlorotic(beret) -> Stomatous(beret)\nforall x (Lucky(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nNonsense(vanya) and Lucky(vanya) -> Stomatous(vanya)\nforall x (Lucky(x) -> Pinnated(x))\n\nNonsense(beret)\n\nTelluric(beret) and forall x (Telluric(x) -> Lucky(x)) -> therefore Lucky(beret) Lucky(beret) and forall x (Lucky(x) -> Nonsense(x)) -> therefore Nonsense(beret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Sidney is awakened. Sidney is eightpenny. Sidney is inbred. Sidney is sidearm. Sidney is hungry. Mira is driving. Mira is eightpenny. Mira is not sidearm. Mira is hungry. Halvard is awakened. Halvard is eightpenny. Halvard is bereft. Halvard is hungry. Ginni is eightpenny. Ginni is sidearm. If Sidney is bereft and Sidney is inbred then Sidney is eightpenny. White things are awakened. If Ginni is bereft and Ginni is hungry then Ginni is driving. All awakened things are inbred. If Sidney is inbred and Sidney is awakened then Sidney is driving. Blue things are bereft. Ginni is not bereft.", "logic": "\nAwakened(sidney)\nEightpenny(sidney)\nInbred(sidney)\nSidearm(sidney)\nHungry(sidney)\nDriving(mira)\nEightpenny(mira)\nnot Sidearm(mira)\nHungry(mira)\nAwakened(halvard)\nEightpenny(halvard)\nBereft(halvard)\nHungry(halvard)\nEightpenny(ginni)\nSidearm(ginni)\nBereft(sidney) and Inbred(sidney) -> Eightpenny(sidney)\nforall x (Sidearm(x) -> Awakened(x))\nBereft(ginni) and Hungry(ginni) -> Driving(ginni)\nforall x (Awakened(x) -> Inbred(x))\nInbred(sidney) and Awakened(sidney) -> Driving(sidney)\nforall x (Awakened(x) -> Bereft(x))\n\nnot Bereft(ginni)\n\nSidearm(ginni) and forall x (Sidearm(x) -> Awakened(x)) -> therefore Awakened(ginni) Awakened(ginni) and forall x (Awakened(x) -> Bereft(x)) -> therefore Bereft(ginni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Catlee is olfactive. Catlee is anapaestic. Catlee is isotropic. Catlee is branchy. Catlee is goateed. Cherilyn is disputed. Cherilyn is anapaestic. Cherilyn is not branchy. Cherilyn is goateed. Kory is olfactive. Kory is anapaestic. Kory is entranced. Kory is goateed. Kerri is anapaestic. Kerri is branchy. If Catlee is entranced and Catlee is isotropic then Catlee is anapaestic. White things are olfactive. If Kerri is entranced and Kerri is goateed then Kerri is disputed. All olfactive things are isotropic. If Catlee is isotropic and Catlee is olfactive then Catlee is disputed. Blue things are entranced. Cherilyn is not entranced.", "logic": "\nOlfactive(catlee)\nAnapaestic(catlee)\nIsotropic(catlee)\nBranchy(catlee)\nGoateed(catlee)\nDisputed(cherilyn)\nAnapaestic(cherilyn)\nnot Branchy(cherilyn)\nGoateed(cherilyn)\nOlfactive(kory)\nAnapaestic(kory)\nEntranced(kory)\nGoateed(kory)\nAnapaestic(kerri)\nBranchy(kerri)\nEntranced(catlee) and Isotropic(catlee) -> Anapaestic(catlee)\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Olfactive(x))\nEntranced(kerri) and Goateed(kerri) -> Disputed(kerri)\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Isotropic(x))\nIsotropic(catlee) and Olfactive(catlee) -> Disputed(catlee)\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Entranced(x))\n\nnot Entranced(cherilyn)\n\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Entranced(x)) <- forall x (Branchy(x) -> Olfactive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Nisse is agamous. Nisse is tenebrific. Nisse is grumpy. Nisse is dashing. Nisse is receivable. Rosmunda is mucoid. Rosmunda is tenebrific. Rosmunda is not dashing. Rosmunda is receivable. Phylys is agamous. Phylys is tenebrific. Phylys is livery. Phylys is receivable. Max is tenebrific. Max is dashing. If Nisse is livery and Nisse is grumpy then Nisse is tenebrific. White things are agamous. If Max is livery and Max is receivable then Max is mucoid. All agamous things are grumpy. If Nisse is grumpy and Nisse is agamous then Nisse is mucoid. Blue things are livery. Rosmunda is grumpy.", "logic": "\nAgamous(nisse)\nTenebrific(nisse)\nGrumpy(nisse)\nDashing(nisse)\nReceivable(nisse)\nMucoid(rosmunda)\nTenebrific(rosmunda)\nnot Dashing(rosmunda)\nReceivable(rosmunda)\nAgamous(phylys)\nTenebrific(phylys)\nLivery(phylys)\nReceivable(phylys)\nTenebrific(max)\nDashing(max)\nLivery(nisse) and Grumpy(nisse) -> Tenebrific(nisse)\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Agamous(x))\nLivery(max) and Receivable(max) -> Mucoid(max)\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Grumpy(x))\nGrumpy(nisse) and Agamous(nisse) -> Mucoid(nisse)\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Livery(x))\n\nGrumpy(rosmunda)\n\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Grumpy(x)) <- forall x (Dashing(x) -> Agamous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Rosalynd is recoilless. Rosalynd is unhatched. Rosalynd is alkaline. Rosalynd is scruffy. Rosalynd is scatty. Clemmy is unremedied. Clemmy is unhatched. Clemmy is not scruffy. Clemmy is scatty. Lurleen is recoilless. Lurleen is unhatched. Lurleen is encumbered. Lurleen is scatty. Rodge is unhatched. Rodge is scruffy. If Rosalynd is encumbered and Rosalynd is alkaline then Rosalynd is unhatched. White things are recoilless. If Rodge is encumbered and Rodge is scatty then Rodge is unremedied. All recoilless things are alkaline. If Rosalynd is alkaline and Rosalynd is recoilless then Rosalynd is unremedied. Blue things are encumbered. Clemmy is not recoilless.", "logic": "\nRecoilless(rosalynd)\nUnhatched(rosalynd)\nAlkaline(rosalynd)\nScruffy(rosalynd)\nScatty(rosalynd)\nUnremedied(clemmy)\nUnhatched(clemmy)\nnot Scruffy(clemmy)\nScatty(clemmy)\nRecoilless(lurleen)\nUnhatched(lurleen)\nEncumbered(lurleen)\nScatty(lurleen)\nUnhatched(rodge)\nScruffy(rodge)\nEncumbered(rosalynd) and Alkaline(rosalynd) -> Unhatched(rosalynd)\nforall x (Scruffy(x) -> Recoilless(x))\nEncumbered(rodge) and Scatty(rodge) -> Unremedied(rodge)\nforall x (Recoilless(x) -> Alkaline(x))\nAlkaline(rosalynd) and Recoilless(rosalynd) -> Unremedied(rosalynd)\nforall x (Recoilless(x) -> Encumbered(x))\n\nnot Recoilless(clemmy)\n\nforall x (Scruffy(x) -> Recoilless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Shel is sagittal. Shel is choragic. Shel is argentine. Shel is unforced. Shel is respectful. Hildy is uterine. Hildy is choragic. Hildy is not unforced. Hildy is respectful. Lazarus is sagittal. Lazarus is choragic. Lazarus is carnassial. Lazarus is respectful. Guendolen is choragic. Guendolen is unforced. If Shel is carnassial and Shel is argentine then Shel is choragic. White things are sagittal. If Guendolen is carnassial and Guendolen is respectful then Guendolen is uterine. All sagittal things are argentine. If Shel is argentine and Shel is sagittal then Shel is uterine. Blue things are carnassial. Guendolen is respectful.", "logic": "\nSagittal(shel)\nChoragic(shel)\nArgentine(shel)\nUnforced(shel)\nRespectful(shel)\nUterine(hildy)\nChoragic(hildy)\nnot Unforced(hildy)\nRespectful(hildy)\nSagittal(lazarus)\nChoragic(lazarus)\nCarnassial(lazarus)\nRespectful(lazarus)\nChoragic(guendolen)\nUnforced(guendolen)\nCarnassial(shel) and Argentine(shel) -> Choragic(shel)\nforall x (Unforced(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nCarnassial(guendolen) and Respectful(guendolen) -> Uterine(guendolen)\nforall x (Sagittal(x) -> Argentine(x))\nArgentine(shel) and Sagittal(shel) -> Uterine(shel)\nforall x (Sagittal(x) -> Carnassial(x))\n\nRespectful(guendolen)\n\nRespectful(guendolen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Tamiko is improved. Tamiko is opulent. Tamiko is bigeneric. Tamiko is assertive. Tamiko is subalpine. Veronike is almighty. Veronike is opulent. Veronike is not assertive. Veronike is subalpine. Stanford is improved. Stanford is opulent. Stanford is unashamed. Stanford is subalpine. Wadsworth is opulent. Wadsworth is assertive. If Tamiko is unashamed and Tamiko is bigeneric then Tamiko is opulent. White things are improved. If Wadsworth is unashamed and Wadsworth is subalpine then Wadsworth is almighty. All improved things are bigeneric. If Tamiko is bigeneric and Tamiko is improved then Tamiko is almighty. Blue things are unashamed. Stanford is not assertive.", "logic": "\nImproved(tamiko)\nOpulent(tamiko)\nBigeneric(tamiko)\nAssertive(tamiko)\nSubalpine(tamiko)\nAlmighty(veronike)\nOpulent(veronike)\nnot Assertive(veronike)\nSubalpine(veronike)\nImproved(stanford)\nOpulent(stanford)\nUnashamed(stanford)\nSubalpine(stanford)\nOpulent(wadsworth)\nAssertive(wadsworth)\nUnashamed(tamiko) and Bigeneric(tamiko) -> Opulent(tamiko)\nforall x (Assertive(x) -> Improved(x))\nUnashamed(wadsworth) and Subalpine(wadsworth) -> Almighty(wadsworth)\nforall x (Improved(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nBigeneric(tamiko) and Improved(tamiko) -> Almighty(tamiko)\nforall x (Improved(x) -> Unashamed(x))\n\nnot Assertive(stanford)\n\nnot Assertive(stanford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "Fionna is turbid. Fionna is champion. Fionna is jellied. Fionna is orangish. Fionna is mouthlike. Shellie is unethical. Shellie is champion. Shellie is not orangish. Shellie is mouthlike. Darci is turbid. Darci is champion. Darci is cushy. Darci is mouthlike. Ashton is champion. Ashton is orangish. If Fionna is cushy and Fionna is jellied then Fionna is champion. White things are turbid. If Ashton is cushy and Ashton is mouthlike then Ashton is unethical. All turbid things are jellied. If Fionna is jellied and Fionna is turbid then Fionna is unethical. Blue things are cushy. Darci is unethical.", "logic": "\nTurbid(fionna)\nChampion(fionna)\nJellied(fionna)\nOrangish(fionna)\nMouthlike(fionna)\nUnethical(shellie)\nChampion(shellie)\nnot Orangish(shellie)\nMouthlike(shellie)\nTurbid(darci)\nChampion(darci)\nCushy(darci)\nMouthlike(darci)\nChampion(ashton)\nOrangish(ashton)\nCushy(fionna) and Jellied(fionna) -> Champion(fionna)\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Turbid(x))\nCushy(ashton) and Mouthlike(ashton) -> Unethical(ashton)\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> Jellied(x))\nJellied(fionna) and Turbid(fionna) -> Unethical(fionna)\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> Cushy(x))\n\nUnethical(darci)\n\nUnethical(darci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1258"} {"premises": "The fredrick is not surplus. The fredrick does not like the aimee. The fredrick scorn the sybille. The fredrick diet the aimee. The fredrick diet the sybille. The aimee crane the sybille. The aimee is stone. The aimee does not like the sybille. The aimee does not need the sybille. The sybille crane the fredrick. The sybille does not eat the aimee. The sybille is not dendroidal. The sybille is surplus. The sybille scorn the fredrick. The sybille diet the fredrick. The sybille diet the aimee. If the aimee does not need the fredrick then the fredrick scorn the sybille. If the aimee is surplus then the aimee crane the fredrick. The fredrick is not surplus.", "logic": "\nnot Surplus(fredrick)\nnot Scorn(fredrick, aimee)\nScorn(fredrick, sybille)\nDiet(fredrick, aimee)\nDiet(fredrick, sybille)\nCrane(aimee, sybille)\nStone(aimee)\nnot Scorn(aimee, sybille)\nnot Diet(aimee, sybille)\nCrane(sybille, fredrick)\nnot Crane(sybille, aimee)\nnot Dendroidal(sybille)\nSurplus(sybille)\nScorn(sybille, fredrick)\nDiet(sybille, fredrick)\nDiet(sybille, aimee)\nnot Diet(aimee, fredrick) -> Scorn(fredrick, sybille)\nSurplus(aimee) -> Crane(aimee, fredrick)\n\nnot Surplus(fredrick)\n\ntherefore not Surplus(fredrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2730"} {"premises": "The otho is not according. The otho does not like the bernice. The otho squeal the alana. The otho motorize the bernice. The otho motorize the alana. The bernice jaunt the alana. The bernice is obstructed. The bernice does not like the alana. The bernice does not need the alana. The alana jaunt the otho. The alana does not eat the bernice. The alana is not payable. The alana is according. The alana squeal the otho. The alana motorize the otho. The alana motorize the bernice. If the bernice does not need the otho then the otho squeal the alana. If the bernice is according then the bernice jaunt the otho. The otho is according.", "logic": "\nnot According(otho)\nnot Squeal(otho, bernice)\nSqueal(otho, alana)\nMotorize(otho, bernice)\nMotorize(otho, alana)\nJaunt(bernice, alana)\nObstructed(bernice)\nnot Squeal(bernice, alana)\nnot Motorize(bernice, alana)\nJaunt(alana, otho)\nnot Jaunt(alana, bernice)\nnot Payable(alana)\nAccording(alana)\nSqueal(alana, otho)\nMotorize(alana, otho)\nMotorize(alana, bernice)\nnot Motorize(bernice, otho) -> Squeal(otho, alana)\nAccording(bernice) -> Jaunt(bernice, otho)\n\nAccording(otho)\n\ntherefore not According(otho)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2730"} {"premises": "The sally is not lubricious. The sally does not like the catharine. The sally manicure the cyndi. The sally injure the catharine. The sally injure the cyndi. The catharine haunt the cyndi. The catharine is reflexive. The catharine does not like the cyndi. The catharine does not need the cyndi. The cyndi haunt the sally. The cyndi does not eat the catharine. The cyndi is not acrogenic. The cyndi is lubricious. The cyndi manicure the sally. The cyndi injure the sally. The cyndi injure the catharine. If the catharine does not need the sally then the sally manicure the cyndi. If the catharine is lubricious then the catharine haunt the sally. The catharine does not eat the sally.", "logic": "\nnot Lubricious(sally)\nnot Manicure(sally, catharine)\nManicure(sally, cyndi)\nInjure(sally, catharine)\nInjure(sally, cyndi)\nHaunt(catharine, cyndi)\nReflexive(catharine)\nnot Manicure(catharine, cyndi)\nnot Injure(catharine, cyndi)\nHaunt(cyndi, sally)\nnot Haunt(cyndi, catharine)\nnot Acrogenic(cyndi)\nLubricious(cyndi)\nManicure(cyndi, sally)\nInjure(cyndi, sally)\nInjure(cyndi, catharine)\nnot Injure(catharine, sally) -> Manicure(sally, cyndi)\nLubricious(catharine) -> Haunt(catharine, sally)\n\nnot Haunt(catharine, sally)\n\nLubricious(catharine) -> Haunt(catharine, sally) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2730"} {"premises": "The maryl is not cankerous. The maryl does not like the skipp. The maryl avail the vicky. The maryl fructify the skipp. The maryl fructify the vicky. The skipp describe the vicky. The skipp is subtropic. The skipp does not like the vicky. The skipp does not need the vicky. The vicky describe the maryl. The vicky does not eat the skipp. The vicky is not bygone. The vicky is cankerous. The vicky avail the maryl. The vicky fructify the maryl. The vicky fructify the skipp. If the skipp does not need the maryl then the maryl avail the vicky. If the skipp is cankerous then the skipp describe the maryl. The maryl is round.", "logic": "\nnot Cankerous(maryl)\nnot Avail(maryl, skipp)\nAvail(maryl, vicky)\nFructify(maryl, skipp)\nFructify(maryl, vicky)\nDescribe(skipp, vicky)\nSubtropic(skipp)\nnot Avail(skipp, vicky)\nnot Fructify(skipp, vicky)\nDescribe(vicky, maryl)\nnot Describe(vicky, skipp)\nnot Bygone(vicky)\nCankerous(vicky)\nAvail(vicky, maryl)\nFructify(vicky, maryl)\nFructify(vicky, skipp)\nnot Fructify(skipp, maryl) -> Avail(maryl, vicky)\nCankerous(skipp) -> Describe(skipp, maryl)\n\nRound(maryl)\n\nRound(maryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2730"} {"premises": "Geraldine is choleraic. Leah is mucose. Leah is quack. Madelena is choleraic. Madelena is teased. Chevy is prize. Chevy is gusseted. Green, prize things are quack. Young things are mucose. If something is quack and prize then it is gusseted. All teased things are quack. If Chevy is choleraic then Chevy is quack. All gusseted, teased things are infrared. If Chevy is quack and Chevy is mucose then Chevy is teased. Furry things are quack. Chevy is gusseted.", "logic": "\nCholeraic(geraldine)\nMucose(leah)\nQuack(leah)\nCholeraic(madelena)\nTeased(madelena)\nPrize(chevy)\nGusseted(chevy)\nforall x (Choleraic(x) and Prize(x) -> Quack(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) -> Mucose(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) and Prize(x) -> Gusseted(x))\nforall x (Teased(x) -> Quack(x))\nCholeraic(chevy) -> Quack(chevy)\nforall x (Gusseted(x) and Teased(x) -> Infrared(x))\nQuack(chevy) and Mucose(chevy) -> Teased(chevy)\nforall x (Prize(x) -> Quack(x))\n\nGusseted(chevy)\n\ntherefore Gusseted(chevy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Ofilia is impaired. Herman is nectarous. Herman is stewed. Sven is impaired. Sven is fired. Zena is glary. Zena is unlimited. Green, glary things are stewed. Young things are nectarous. If something is stewed and glary then it is unlimited. All fired things are stewed. If Zena is impaired then Zena is stewed. All unlimited, fired things are cuddlesome. If Zena is stewed and Zena is nectarous then Zena is fired. Furry things are stewed. Herman is not stewed.", "logic": "\nImpaired(ofilia)\nNectarous(herman)\nStewed(herman)\nImpaired(sven)\nFired(sven)\nGlary(zena)\nUnlimited(zena)\nforall x (Impaired(x) and Glary(x) -> Stewed(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) -> Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) and Glary(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Stewed(x))\nImpaired(zena) -> Stewed(zena)\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Fired(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nStewed(zena) and Nectarous(zena) -> Fired(zena)\nforall x (Glary(x) -> Stewed(x))\n\nnot Stewed(herman)\n\ntherefore Stewed(herman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Opal is calendric. Jeniffer is precise. Jeniffer is severe. Ardine is calendric. Ardine is umbellar. Yigal is hearty. Yigal is iranian. Green, hearty things are severe. Young things are precise. If something is severe and hearty then it is iranian. All umbellar things are severe. If Yigal is calendric then Yigal is severe. All iranian, umbellar things are stagnant. If Yigal is severe and Yigal is precise then Yigal is umbellar. Furry things are severe. Ardine is severe.", "logic": "\nCalendric(opal)\nPrecise(jeniffer)\nSevere(jeniffer)\nCalendric(ardine)\nUmbellar(ardine)\nHearty(yigal)\nIranian(yigal)\nforall x (Calendric(x) and Hearty(x) -> Severe(x))\nforall x (Severe(x) -> Precise(x))\nforall x (Severe(x) and Hearty(x) -> Iranian(x))\nforall x (Umbellar(x) -> Severe(x))\nCalendric(yigal) -> Severe(yigal)\nforall x (Iranian(x) and Umbellar(x) -> Stagnant(x))\nSevere(yigal) and Precise(yigal) -> Umbellar(yigal)\nforall x (Hearty(x) -> Severe(x))\n\nSevere(ardine)\n\nUmbellar(ardine) and forall x (Umbellar(x) -> Severe(x)) -> therefore Severe(ardine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Reinhard is alated. Tilda is notifiable. Tilda is unemphatic. Esmeralda is alated. Esmeralda is petaloid. Kaleb is spectral. Kaleb is unrevealed. Green, spectral things are unemphatic. Young things are notifiable. If something is unemphatic and spectral then it is unrevealed. All petaloid things are unemphatic. If Kaleb is alated then Kaleb is unemphatic. All unrevealed, petaloid things are attested. If Kaleb is unemphatic and Kaleb is notifiable then Kaleb is petaloid. Furry things are unemphatic. Kaleb is not unemphatic.", "logic": "\nAlated(reinhard)\nNotifiable(tilda)\nUnemphatic(tilda)\nAlated(esmeralda)\nPetaloid(esmeralda)\nSpectral(kaleb)\nUnrevealed(kaleb)\nforall x (Alated(x) and Spectral(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nforall x (Unemphatic(x) -> Notifiable(x))\nforall x (Unemphatic(x) and Spectral(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Petaloid(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\nAlated(kaleb) -> Unemphatic(kaleb)\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) and Petaloid(x) -> Attested(x))\nUnemphatic(kaleb) and Notifiable(kaleb) -> Petaloid(kaleb)\nforall x (Spectral(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\n\nnot Unemphatic(kaleb)\n\nSpectral(kaleb) and forall x (Spectral(x) -> Unemphatic(x)) -> therefore Unemphatic(kaleb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Maria is corporal. Axel is steadfast. Axel is finnish. Noel is corporal. Noel is arciform. Adelaide is sinhalese. Adelaide is worsened. Green, sinhalese things are finnish. Young things are steadfast. If something is finnish and sinhalese then it is worsened. All arciform things are finnish. If Adelaide is corporal then Adelaide is finnish. All worsened, arciform things are feisty. If Adelaide is finnish and Adelaide is steadfast then Adelaide is arciform. Furry things are finnish. Adelaide is steadfast.", "logic": "\nCorporal(maria)\nSteadfast(axel)\nFinnish(axel)\nCorporal(noel)\nArciform(noel)\nSinhalese(adelaide)\nWorsened(adelaide)\nforall x (Corporal(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Finnish(x))\nforall x (Finnish(x) -> Steadfast(x))\nforall x (Finnish(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Worsened(x))\nforall x (Arciform(x) -> Finnish(x))\nCorporal(adelaide) -> Finnish(adelaide)\nforall x (Worsened(x) and Arciform(x) -> Feisty(x))\nFinnish(adelaide) and Steadfast(adelaide) -> Arciform(adelaide)\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) -> Finnish(x))\n\nSteadfast(adelaide)\n\nSinhalese(adelaide) and forall x (Sinhalese(x) -> Finnish(x)) -> therefore Finnish(adelaide) Finnish(adelaide) and forall x (Finnish(x) -> Steadfast(x)) -> therefore Steadfast(adelaide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Wanda is sallow. Jinny is collateral. Jinny is prewar. Milli is sallow. Milli is struggling. Bert is myotonic. Bert is separate. Green, myotonic things are prewar. Young things are collateral. If something is prewar and myotonic then it is separate. All struggling things are prewar. If Bert is sallow then Bert is prewar. All separate, struggling things are bisontine. If Bert is prewar and Bert is collateral then Bert is struggling. Furry things are prewar. Bert is not collateral.", "logic": "\nSallow(wanda)\nCollateral(jinny)\nPrewar(jinny)\nSallow(milli)\nStruggling(milli)\nMyotonic(bert)\nSeparate(bert)\nforall x (Sallow(x) and Myotonic(x) -> Prewar(x))\nforall x (Prewar(x) -> Collateral(x))\nforall x (Prewar(x) and Myotonic(x) -> Separate(x))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Prewar(x))\nSallow(bert) -> Prewar(bert)\nforall x (Separate(x) and Struggling(x) -> Bisontine(x))\nPrewar(bert) and Collateral(bert) -> Struggling(bert)\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Prewar(x))\n\nnot Collateral(bert)\n\nMyotonic(bert) and forall x (Myotonic(x) -> Prewar(x)) -> therefore Prewar(bert) Prewar(bert) and forall x (Prewar(x) -> Collateral(x)) -> therefore Collateral(bert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Barry is rusty. Florence is carbonylic. Florence is xciii. Naoma is rusty. Naoma is sublingual. Broddy is allantoid. Broddy is yuman. Green, allantoid things are xciii. Young things are carbonylic. If something is xciii and allantoid then it is yuman. All sublingual things are xciii. If Broddy is rusty then Broddy is xciii. All yuman, sublingual things are watchful. If Broddy is xciii and Broddy is carbonylic then Broddy is sublingual. Furry things are xciii. Broddy is sublingual.", "logic": "\nRusty(barry)\nCarbonylic(florence)\nXciii(florence)\nRusty(naoma)\nSublingual(naoma)\nAllantoid(broddy)\nYuman(broddy)\nforall x (Rusty(x) and Allantoid(x) -> Xciii(x))\nforall x (Xciii(x) -> Carbonylic(x))\nforall x (Xciii(x) and Allantoid(x) -> Yuman(x))\nforall x (Sublingual(x) -> Xciii(x))\nRusty(broddy) -> Xciii(broddy)\nforall x (Yuman(x) and Sublingual(x) -> Watchful(x))\nXciii(broddy) and Carbonylic(broddy) -> Sublingual(broddy)\nforall x (Allantoid(x) -> Xciii(x))\n\nSublingual(broddy)\n\nAllantoid(broddy) and forall x (Allantoid(x) -> Xciii(x)) -> therefore Xciii(broddy) Allantoid(broddy) and forall x (Allantoid(x) -> Xciii(x)) -> therefore Xciii(broddy) Xciii(broddy) and forall x (Xciii(x) -> Carbonylic(x)) -> therefore Carbonylic(broddy) Xciii(broddy) and Carbonylic(broddy) and Xciii(broddy) and Carbonylic(broddy) -> Sublingual(broddy) -> therefore Sublingual(broddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Andreas is apteral. Darla is squiffy. Darla is drawn. Sheffield is apteral. Sheffield is hurrying. Daphne is diverging. Daphne is randomized. Green, diverging things are drawn. Young things are squiffy. If something is drawn and diverging then it is randomized. All hurrying things are drawn. If Daphne is apteral then Daphne is drawn. All randomized, hurrying things are appetizing. If Daphne is drawn and Daphne is squiffy then Daphne is hurrying. Furry things are drawn. Daphne is not hurrying.", "logic": "\nApteral(andreas)\nSquiffy(darla)\nDrawn(darla)\nApteral(sheffield)\nHurrying(sheffield)\nDiverging(daphne)\nRandomized(daphne)\nforall x (Apteral(x) and Diverging(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) -> Squiffy(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) and Diverging(x) -> Randomized(x))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) -> Drawn(x))\nApteral(daphne) -> Drawn(daphne)\nforall x (Randomized(x) and Hurrying(x) -> Appetizing(x))\nDrawn(daphne) and Squiffy(daphne) -> Hurrying(daphne)\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Drawn(x))\n\nnot Hurrying(daphne)\n\nDiverging(daphne) and forall x (Diverging(x) -> Drawn(x)) -> therefore Drawn(daphne) Diverging(daphne) and forall x (Diverging(x) -> Drawn(x)) -> therefore Drawn(daphne) Drawn(daphne) and forall x (Drawn(x) -> Squiffy(x)) -> therefore Squiffy(daphne) Drawn(daphne) and Squiffy(daphne) and Drawn(daphne) and Squiffy(daphne) -> Hurrying(daphne) -> therefore Hurrying(daphne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Correna is ruandan. Seka is dermal. Seka is antitoxic. Letti is ruandan. Letti is pacifist. Gena is conserved. Gena is amnic. Green, conserved things are antitoxic. Young things are dermal. If something is antitoxic and conserved then it is amnic. All pacifist things are antitoxic. If Gena is ruandan then Gena is antitoxic. All amnic, pacifist things are humoral. If Gena is antitoxic and Gena is dermal then Gena is pacifist. Furry things are antitoxic. Correna is not humoral.", "logic": "\nRuandan(correna)\nDermal(seka)\nAntitoxic(seka)\nRuandan(letti)\nPacifist(letti)\nConserved(gena)\nAmnic(gena)\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Conserved(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) -> Dermal(x))\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) and Conserved(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Pacifist(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\nRuandan(gena) -> Antitoxic(gena)\nforall x (Amnic(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Humoral(x))\nAntitoxic(gena) and Dermal(gena) -> Pacifist(gena)\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\n\nnot Humoral(correna)\n\nforall x (Amnic(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Humoral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Sidonia is past. Anatol is sidearm. Anatol is sudsy. Cesar is past. Cesar is nonpublic. Michelina is plumelike. Michelina is archaean. Green, plumelike things are sudsy. Young things are sidearm. If something is sudsy and plumelike then it is archaean. All nonpublic things are sudsy. If Michelina is past then Michelina is sudsy. All archaean, nonpublic things are traceable. If Michelina is sudsy and Michelina is sidearm then Michelina is nonpublic. Furry things are sudsy. Cesar is archaean.", "logic": "\nPast(sidonia)\nSidearm(anatol)\nSudsy(anatol)\nPast(cesar)\nNonpublic(cesar)\nPlumelike(michelina)\nArchaean(michelina)\nforall x (Past(x) and Plumelike(x) -> Sudsy(x))\nforall x (Sudsy(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nforall x (Sudsy(x) and Plumelike(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Sudsy(x))\nPast(michelina) -> Sudsy(michelina)\nforall x (Archaean(x) and Nonpublic(x) -> Traceable(x))\nSudsy(michelina) and Sidearm(michelina) -> Nonpublic(michelina)\nforall x (Plumelike(x) -> Sudsy(x))\n\nArchaean(cesar)\n\nforall x (Sudsy(x) and Plumelike(x) -> Archaean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Brynne is conic. Heidie is highbrowed. Heidie is attended. Jacquelin is conic. Jacquelin is uremic. Nadiya is retracted. Nadiya is twinning. Green, retracted things are attended. Young things are highbrowed. If something is attended and retracted then it is twinning. All uremic things are attended. If Nadiya is conic then Nadiya is attended. All twinning, uremic things are dehiscent. If Nadiya is attended and Nadiya is highbrowed then Nadiya is uremic. Furry things are attended. Brynne is not attended.", "logic": "\nConic(brynne)\nHighbrowed(heidie)\nAttended(heidie)\nConic(jacquelin)\nUremic(jacquelin)\nRetracted(nadiya)\nTwinning(nadiya)\nforall x (Conic(x) and Retracted(x) -> Attended(x))\nforall x (Attended(x) -> Highbrowed(x))\nforall x (Attended(x) and Retracted(x) -> Twinning(x))\nforall x (Uremic(x) -> Attended(x))\nConic(nadiya) -> Attended(nadiya)\nforall x (Twinning(x) and Uremic(x) -> Dehiscent(x))\nAttended(nadiya) and Highbrowed(nadiya) -> Uremic(nadiya)\nforall x (Retracted(x) -> Attended(x))\n\nnot Attended(brynne)\n\nforall x (Conic(x) and Retracted(x) -> Attended(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Carmela is blamable. Felix is overjoyed. Felix is tuscan. Maurine is blamable. Maurine is earthy. Bria is puckish. Bria is thawed. Green, puckish things are tuscan. Young things are overjoyed. If something is tuscan and puckish then it is thawed. All earthy things are tuscan. If Bria is blamable then Bria is tuscan. All thawed, earthy things are incident. If Bria is tuscan and Bria is overjoyed then Bria is earthy. Furry things are tuscan. Maurine is incident.", "logic": "\nBlamable(carmela)\nOverjoyed(felix)\nTuscan(felix)\nBlamable(maurine)\nEarthy(maurine)\nPuckish(bria)\nThawed(bria)\nforall x (Blamable(x) and Puckish(x) -> Tuscan(x))\nforall x (Tuscan(x) -> Overjoyed(x))\nforall x (Tuscan(x) and Puckish(x) -> Thawed(x))\nforall x (Earthy(x) -> Tuscan(x))\nBlamable(bria) -> Tuscan(bria)\nforall x (Thawed(x) and Earthy(x) -> Incident(x))\nTuscan(bria) and Overjoyed(bria) -> Earthy(bria)\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Tuscan(x))\n\nIncident(maurine)\n\nforall x (Thawed(x) and Earthy(x) -> Incident(x)) <- forall x (Tuscan(x) and Puckish(x) -> Thawed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Barbabas is lanceolate. Ezekiel is combative. Ezekiel is equipotent. Gratiana is lanceolate. Gratiana is edited. Carri is unifoliate. Carri is hexangular. Green, unifoliate things are equipotent. Young things are combative. If something is equipotent and unifoliate then it is hexangular. All edited things are equipotent. If Carri is lanceolate then Carri is equipotent. All hexangular, edited things are genteel. If Carri is equipotent and Carri is combative then Carri is edited. Furry things are equipotent. Ezekiel is not lanceolate.", "logic": "\nLanceolate(barbabas)\nCombative(ezekiel)\nEquipotent(ezekiel)\nLanceolate(gratiana)\nEdited(gratiana)\nUnifoliate(carri)\nHexangular(carri)\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) and Unifoliate(x) -> Equipotent(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Combative(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Unifoliate(x) -> Hexangular(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) -> Equipotent(x))\nLanceolate(carri) -> Equipotent(carri)\nforall x (Hexangular(x) and Edited(x) -> Genteel(x))\nEquipotent(carri) and Combative(carri) -> Edited(carri)\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Equipotent(x))\n\nnot Lanceolate(ezekiel)\n\nnot Lanceolate(ezekiel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Averill is acetous. Candra is unfinished. Candra is unfearing. Edgar is acetous. Edgar is elemental. Ambrosi is bisulcate. Ambrosi is anguillan. Green, bisulcate things are unfearing. Young things are unfinished. If something is unfearing and bisulcate then it is anguillan. All elemental things are unfearing. If Ambrosi is acetous then Ambrosi is unfearing. All anguillan, elemental things are glad. If Ambrosi is unfearing and Ambrosi is unfinished then Ambrosi is elemental. Furry things are unfearing. Ambrosi is acetous.", "logic": "\nAcetous(averill)\nUnfinished(candra)\nUnfearing(candra)\nAcetous(edgar)\nElemental(edgar)\nBisulcate(ambrosi)\nAnguillan(ambrosi)\nforall x (Acetous(x) and Bisulcate(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Bisulcate(x) -> Anguillan(x))\nforall x (Elemental(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nAcetous(ambrosi) -> Unfearing(ambrosi)\nforall x (Anguillan(x) and Elemental(x) -> Glad(x))\nUnfearing(ambrosi) and Unfinished(ambrosi) -> Elemental(ambrosi)\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) -> Unfearing(x))\n\nAcetous(ambrosi)\n\nAcetous(ambrosi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Hugh is surmisable. Tam is humanistic. Tam is seriocomic. Redmond is surmisable. Redmond is unpleasant. Lorianne is squarish. Lorianne is glistering. Green, squarish things are seriocomic. Young things are humanistic. If something is seriocomic and squarish then it is glistering. All unpleasant things are seriocomic. If Lorianne is surmisable then Lorianne is seriocomic. All glistering, unpleasant things are slushy. If Lorianne is seriocomic and Lorianne is humanistic then Lorianne is unpleasant. Furry things are seriocomic. Redmond is not squarish.", "logic": "\nSurmisable(hugh)\nHumanistic(tam)\nSeriocomic(tam)\nSurmisable(redmond)\nUnpleasant(redmond)\nSquarish(lorianne)\nGlistering(lorianne)\nforall x (Surmisable(x) and Squarish(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Seriocomic(x) and Squarish(x) -> Glistering(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\nSurmisable(lorianne) -> Seriocomic(lorianne)\nforall x (Glistering(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Slushy(x))\nSeriocomic(lorianne) and Humanistic(lorianne) -> Unpleasant(lorianne)\nforall x (Squarish(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\n\nnot Squarish(redmond)\n\nnot Squarish(redmond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "Brinkley is unilateral. Rhoda is foetal. Rhoda is ghostlike. Adele is unilateral. Adele is chronic. Adina is magnetized. Adina is unbending. Green, magnetized things are ghostlike. Young things are foetal. If something is ghostlike and magnetized then it is unbending. All chronic things are ghostlike. If Adina is unilateral then Adina is ghostlike. All unbending, chronic things are appealing. If Adina is ghostlike and Adina is foetal then Adina is chronic. Furry things are ghostlike. Rhoda is chronic.", "logic": "\nUnilateral(brinkley)\nFoetal(rhoda)\nGhostlike(rhoda)\nUnilateral(adele)\nChronic(adele)\nMagnetized(adina)\nUnbending(adina)\nforall x (Unilateral(x) and Magnetized(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) and Magnetized(x) -> Unbending(x))\nforall x (Chronic(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nUnilateral(adina) -> Ghostlike(adina)\nforall x (Unbending(x) and Chronic(x) -> Appealing(x))\nGhostlike(adina) and Foetal(adina) -> Chronic(adina)\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\n\nChronic(rhoda)\n\nChronic(rhoda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-836"} {"premises": "The shannon is sedate. All resonating things are groggy. All skyward things are groggy. If something is sedate then it is skyward. If the shannon is groggy then the shannon is nonmotile. Blue things are sedate. If something is nonmotile then it is sedate. All groggy, nonmotile things are sedate. If the shannon is groggy then the shannon is skyward. The shannon is sedate.", "logic": "\nSedate(shannon)\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Groggy(x))\nforall x (Skyward(x) -> Groggy(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) -> Skyward(x))\nGroggy(shannon) -> Nonmotile(shannon)\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Sedate(x))\nforall x (Nonmotile(x) -> Sedate(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) and Nonmotile(x) -> Sedate(x))\nGroggy(shannon) -> Skyward(shannon)\n\nSedate(shannon)\n\ntherefore Sedate(shannon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The ronnica is skirting. All skintight things are dazzling. All minty things are dazzling. If something is skirting then it is minty. If the ronnica is dazzling then the ronnica is incursive. Blue things are skirting. If something is incursive then it is skirting. All dazzling, incursive things are skirting. If the ronnica is dazzling then the ronnica is minty. The ronnica is not skirting.", "logic": "\nSkirting(ronnica)\nforall x (Skintight(x) -> Dazzling(x))\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Dazzling(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Minty(x))\nDazzling(ronnica) -> Incursive(ronnica)\nforall x (Skintight(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Incursive(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Dazzling(x) and Incursive(x) -> Skirting(x))\nDazzling(ronnica) -> Minty(ronnica)\n\nnot Skirting(ronnica)\n\ntherefore Skirting(ronnica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The ashleigh is invariant. All crafty things are quick. All quack things are quick. If something is invariant then it is quack. If the ashleigh is quick then the ashleigh is reniform. Blue things are invariant. If something is reniform then it is invariant. All quick, reniform things are invariant. If the ashleigh is quick then the ashleigh is quack. The ashleigh is quack.", "logic": "\nInvariant(ashleigh)\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> Quick(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) -> Quick(x))\nforall x (Invariant(x) -> Quack(x))\nQuick(ashleigh) -> Reniform(ashleigh)\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> Invariant(x))\nforall x (Reniform(x) -> Invariant(x))\nforall x (Quick(x) and Reniform(x) -> Invariant(x))\nQuick(ashleigh) -> Quack(ashleigh)\n\nQuack(ashleigh)\n\nInvariant(ashleigh) and forall x (Invariant(x) -> Quack(x)) -> therefore Quack(ashleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The margo is remote. All lubricated things are backswept. All snakelike things are backswept. If something is remote then it is snakelike. If the margo is backswept then the margo is dissenting. Blue things are remote. If something is dissenting then it is remote. All backswept, dissenting things are remote. If the margo is backswept then the margo is snakelike. The margo is not snakelike.", "logic": "\nRemote(margo)\nforall x (Lubricated(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Snakelike(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Remote(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nBackswept(margo) -> Dissenting(margo)\nforall x (Lubricated(x) -> Remote(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Remote(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) and Dissenting(x) -> Remote(x))\nBackswept(margo) -> Snakelike(margo)\n\nnot Snakelike(margo)\n\nRemote(margo) and forall x (Remote(x) -> Snakelike(x)) -> therefore Snakelike(margo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The mari is silvan. All misogynic things are sonsie. All butcherly things are sonsie. If something is silvan then it is butcherly. If the mari is sonsie then the mari is coalesced. Blue things are silvan. If something is coalesced then it is silvan. All sonsie, coalesced things are silvan. If the mari is sonsie then the mari is butcherly. The mari is sonsie.", "logic": "\nSilvan(mari)\nforall x (Misogynic(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Silvan(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nSonsie(mari) -> Coalesced(mari)\nforall x (Misogynic(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Coalesced(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) and Coalesced(x) -> Silvan(x))\nSonsie(mari) -> Butcherly(mari)\n\nSonsie(mari)\n\nSilvan(mari) and forall x (Silvan(x) -> Butcherly(x)) -> therefore Butcherly(mari) Butcherly(mari) and forall x (Butcherly(x) -> Sonsie(x)) -> therefore Sonsie(mari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The alvera is thenal. All tracheal things are iraki. All strung things are iraki. If something is thenal then it is strung. If the alvera is iraki then the alvera is aphaeretic. Blue things are thenal. If something is aphaeretic then it is thenal. All iraki, aphaeretic things are thenal. If the alvera is iraki then the alvera is strung. The alvera is not iraki.", "logic": "\nThenal(alvera)\nforall x (Tracheal(x) -> Iraki(x))\nforall x (Strung(x) -> Iraki(x))\nforall x (Thenal(x) -> Strung(x))\nIraki(alvera) -> Aphaeretic(alvera)\nforall x (Tracheal(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Aphaeretic(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Iraki(x) and Aphaeretic(x) -> Thenal(x))\nIraki(alvera) -> Strung(alvera)\n\nnot Iraki(alvera)\n\nThenal(alvera) and forall x (Thenal(x) -> Strung(x)) -> therefore Strung(alvera) Strung(alvera) and forall x (Strung(x) -> Iraki(x)) -> therefore Iraki(alvera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The paulo is altered. All bulky things are nicene. All required things are nicene. If something is altered then it is required. If the paulo is nicene then the paulo is honourable. Blue things are altered. If something is honourable then it is altered. All nicene, honourable things are altered. If the paulo is nicene then the paulo is required. The paulo is honourable.", "logic": "\nAltered(paulo)\nforall x (Bulky(x) -> Nicene(x))\nforall x (Required(x) -> Nicene(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Required(x))\nNicene(paulo) -> Honourable(paulo)\nforall x (Bulky(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Honourable(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Nicene(x) and Honourable(x) -> Altered(x))\nNicene(paulo) -> Required(paulo)\n\nHonourable(paulo)\n\nAltered(paulo) and forall x (Altered(x) -> Required(x)) -> therefore Required(paulo) Required(paulo) and forall x (Required(x) -> Nicene(x)) -> therefore Nicene(paulo) Nicene(paulo) and Nicene(paulo) -> Honourable(paulo) -> therefore Honourable(paulo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The annemarie is busty. All overstrung things are yeasty. All raucous things are yeasty. If something is busty then it is raucous. If the annemarie is yeasty then the annemarie is masterly. Blue things are busty. If something is masterly then it is busty. All yeasty, masterly things are busty. If the annemarie is yeasty then the annemarie is raucous. The annemarie is not masterly.", "logic": "\nBusty(annemarie)\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Busty(x) -> Raucous(x))\nYeasty(annemarie) -> Masterly(annemarie)\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Busty(x))\nforall x (Masterly(x) -> Busty(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) and Masterly(x) -> Busty(x))\nYeasty(annemarie) -> Raucous(annemarie)\n\nnot Masterly(annemarie)\n\nBusty(annemarie) and forall x (Busty(x) -> Raucous(x)) -> therefore Raucous(annemarie) Raucous(annemarie) and forall x (Raucous(x) -> Yeasty(x)) -> therefore Yeasty(annemarie) Yeasty(annemarie) and Yeasty(annemarie) -> Masterly(annemarie) -> therefore Masterly(annemarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The ede is adactylous. All alkaline things are lawful. All ungallant things are lawful. If something is adactylous then it is ungallant. If the ede is lawful then the ede is nicaean. Blue things are adactylous. If something is nicaean then it is adactylous. All lawful, nicaean things are adactylous. If the ede is lawful then the ede is ungallant. The ede does not see the ede.", "logic": "\nAdactylous(ede)\nforall x (Alkaline(x) -> Lawful(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) -> Lawful(x))\nforall x (Adactylous(x) -> Ungallant(x))\nLawful(ede) -> Nicaean(ede)\nforall x (Alkaline(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Lawful(x) and Nicaean(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nLawful(ede) -> Ungallant(ede)\n\nnot Sees(ede, ede)\n\nnot Sees(ede, ede) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The celesta is exalting. All curly things are ribbed. All deweyan things are ribbed. If something is exalting then it is deweyan. If the celesta is ribbed then the celesta is querulous. Blue things are exalting. If something is querulous then it is exalting. All ribbed, querulous things are exalting. If the celesta is ribbed then the celesta is deweyan. The celesta likes the celesta.", "logic": "\nExalting(celesta)\nforall x (Curly(x) -> Ribbed(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Ribbed(x))\nforall x (Exalting(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nRibbed(celesta) -> Querulous(celesta)\nforall x (Curly(x) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Querulous(x) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Ribbed(x) and Querulous(x) -> Exalting(x))\nRibbed(celesta) -> Deweyan(celesta)\n\nLikes(celesta, celesta)\n\nLikes(celesta, celesta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The chastity is patent. All omissible things are prongy. All fugitive things are prongy. If something is patent then it is fugitive. If the chastity is prongy then the chastity is debasing. Blue things are patent. If something is debasing then it is patent. All prongy, debasing things are patent. If the chastity is prongy then the chastity is fugitive. The chastity is not omissible.", "logic": "\nPatent(chastity)\nforall x (Omissible(x) -> Prongy(x))\nforall x (Fugitive(x) -> Prongy(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nProngy(chastity) -> Debasing(chastity)\nforall x (Omissible(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Debasing(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) and Debasing(x) -> Patent(x))\nProngy(chastity) -> Fugitive(chastity)\n\nnot Omissible(chastity)\n\nnot Omissible(chastity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The alicia is misshapen. All congenital things are stressed. All tapering things are stressed. If something is misshapen then it is tapering. If the alicia is stressed then the alicia is pleading. Blue things are misshapen. If something is pleading then it is misshapen. All stressed, pleading things are misshapen. If the alicia is stressed then the alicia is tapering. The alicia chases the alicia.", "logic": "\nMisshapen(alicia)\nforall x (Congenital(x) -> Stressed(x))\nforall x (Tapering(x) -> Stressed(x))\nforall x (Misshapen(x) -> Tapering(x))\nStressed(alicia) -> Pleading(alicia)\nforall x (Congenital(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nforall x (Pleading(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and Pleading(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nStressed(alicia) -> Tapering(alicia)\n\nChases(alicia, alicia)\n\nChases(alicia, alicia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1082"} {"premises": "The rozele bonnet the simmonds. The rozele inlay the simmonds. The simmonds inlay the rozele. If someone is according then they chase the simmonds. If someone bonnet the rozele then the rozele misinform the simmonds. If someone is chartreuse and they chase the simmonds then they chase the rozele. If someone misinform the simmonds then they are according. If the simmonds misinform the rozele and the rozele bonnet the simmonds then the rozele is honey. If the rozele inlay the simmonds then the simmonds bonnet the rozele. If someone is matured then they chase the simmonds. If the simmonds misinform the rozele and the simmonds is honey then the rozele is euphonic. The rozele bonnet the simmonds.", "logic": "\nBonnet(rozele, simmonds)\nInlay(rozele, simmonds)\nInlay(simmonds, rozele)\nforall x (According(x) -> Bonnet(x, simmonds))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, rozele) -> Misinform(rozele, simmonds))\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) and Bonnet(x, simmonds) -> Bonnet(x, rozele))\nforall x (Misinform(x, simmonds) -> According(x))\nMisinform(simmonds, rozele) and Bonnet(rozele, simmonds) -> Honey(rozele)\nInlay(rozele, simmonds) -> Bonnet(simmonds, rozele)\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Bonnet(x, simmonds))\nMisinform(simmonds, rozele) and Honey(simmonds) -> Euphonic(rozele)\n\nBonnet(rozele, simmonds)\n\ntherefore Bonnet(rozele, simmonds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The cherilyn deodorise the glennie. The cherilyn shimmy the glennie. The glennie shimmy the cherilyn. If someone is perfected then they chase the glennie. If someone deodorise the cherilyn then the cherilyn anglicize the glennie. If someone is sentential and they chase the glennie then they chase the cherilyn. If someone anglicize the glennie then they are perfected. If the glennie anglicize the cherilyn and the cherilyn deodorise the glennie then the cherilyn is depilous. If the cherilyn shimmy the glennie then the glennie deodorise the cherilyn. If someone is lentic then they chase the glennie. If the glennie anglicize the cherilyn and the glennie is depilous then the cherilyn is biblical. The glennie does not need the cherilyn.", "logic": "\nDeodorise(cherilyn, glennie)\nShimmy(cherilyn, glennie)\nShimmy(glennie, cherilyn)\nforall x (Perfected(x) -> Deodorise(x, glennie))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, cherilyn) -> Anglicize(cherilyn, glennie))\nforall x (Sentential(x) and Deodorise(x, glennie) -> Deodorise(x, cherilyn))\nforall x (Anglicize(x, glennie) -> Perfected(x))\nAnglicize(glennie, cherilyn) and Deodorise(cherilyn, glennie) -> Depilous(cherilyn)\nShimmy(cherilyn, glennie) -> Deodorise(glennie, cherilyn)\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Deodorise(x, glennie))\nAnglicize(glennie, cherilyn) and Depilous(glennie) -> Biblical(cherilyn)\n\nnot Shimmy(glennie, cherilyn)\n\ntherefore Shimmy(glennie, cherilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The berta remark the marcus. The berta encounter the marcus. The marcus encounter the berta. If someone is stomachal then they chase the marcus. If someone remark the berta then the berta repoint the marcus. If someone is stupefied and they chase the marcus then they chase the berta. If someone repoint the marcus then they are stomachal. If the marcus repoint the berta and the berta remark the marcus then the berta is quotable. If the berta encounter the marcus then the marcus remark the berta. If someone is incorrect then they chase the marcus. If the marcus repoint the berta and the marcus is quotable then the berta is venezuelan. The marcus remark the berta.", "logic": "\nRemark(berta, marcus)\nEncounter(berta, marcus)\nEncounter(marcus, berta)\nforall x (Stomachal(x) -> Remark(x, marcus))\nforall x (Remark(x, berta) -> Repoint(berta, marcus))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) and Remark(x, marcus) -> Remark(x, berta))\nforall x (Repoint(x, marcus) -> Stomachal(x))\nRepoint(marcus, berta) and Remark(berta, marcus) -> Quotable(berta)\nEncounter(berta, marcus) -> Remark(marcus, berta)\nforall x (Incorrect(x) -> Remark(x, marcus))\nRepoint(marcus, berta) and Quotable(marcus) -> Venezuelan(berta)\n\nRemark(marcus, berta)\n\nEncounter(berta, marcus) and Encounter(berta, marcus) -> Remark(marcus, berta) -> therefore Remark(marcus, berta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The tonnie place the leelah. The tonnie renew the leelah. The leelah renew the tonnie. If someone is azido then they chase the leelah. If someone place the tonnie then the tonnie shadow the leelah. If someone is bistred and they chase the leelah then they chase the tonnie. If someone shadow the leelah then they are azido. If the leelah shadow the tonnie and the tonnie place the leelah then the tonnie is redheaded. If the tonnie renew the leelah then the leelah place the tonnie. If someone is serflike then they chase the leelah. If the leelah shadow the tonnie and the leelah is redheaded then the tonnie is tubed. The leelah does not chase the tonnie.", "logic": "\nPlace(tonnie, leelah)\nRenew(tonnie, leelah)\nRenew(leelah, tonnie)\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Place(x, leelah))\nforall x (Place(x, tonnie) -> Shadow(tonnie, leelah))\nforall x (Bistred(x) and Place(x, leelah) -> Place(x, tonnie))\nforall x (Shadow(x, leelah) -> Azido(x))\nShadow(leelah, tonnie) and Place(tonnie, leelah) -> Redheaded(tonnie)\nRenew(tonnie, leelah) -> Place(leelah, tonnie)\nforall x (Serflike(x) -> Place(x, leelah))\nShadow(leelah, tonnie) and Redheaded(leelah) -> Tubed(tonnie)\n\nnot Place(leelah, tonnie)\n\nRenew(tonnie, leelah) and Renew(tonnie, leelah) -> Place(leelah, tonnie) -> therefore Place(leelah, tonnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The hall deodorise the chantalle. The hall reserve the chantalle. The chantalle reserve the hall. If someone is clathrate then they chase the chantalle. If someone deodorise the hall then the hall drip the chantalle. If someone is bouffant and they chase the chantalle then they chase the hall. If someone drip the chantalle then they are clathrate. If the chantalle drip the hall and the hall deodorise the chantalle then the hall is rawboned. If the hall reserve the chantalle then the chantalle deodorise the hall. If someone is motive then they chase the chantalle. If the chantalle drip the hall and the chantalle is rawboned then the hall is sickish. The hall drip the chantalle.", "logic": "\nDeodorise(hall, chantalle)\nReserve(hall, chantalle)\nReserve(chantalle, hall)\nforall x (Clathrate(x) -> Deodorise(x, chantalle))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, hall) -> Drip(hall, chantalle))\nforall x (Bouffant(x) and Deodorise(x, chantalle) -> Deodorise(x, hall))\nforall x (Drip(x, chantalle) -> Clathrate(x))\nDrip(chantalle, hall) and Deodorise(hall, chantalle) -> Rawboned(hall)\nReserve(hall, chantalle) -> Deodorise(chantalle, hall)\nforall x (Motive(x) -> Deodorise(x, chantalle))\nDrip(chantalle, hall) and Rawboned(chantalle) -> Sickish(hall)\n\nDrip(hall, chantalle)\n\nReserve(hall, chantalle) and Reserve(hall, chantalle) -> Deodorise(chantalle, hall) -> therefore Deodorise(chantalle, hall) Deodorise(chantalle, hall) and forall x (Deodorise(x, hall) -> Drip(hall, chantalle)) -> therefore Drip(hall, chantalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The vic core the jennee. The vic reiterate the jennee. The jennee reiterate the vic. If someone is consummate then they chase the jennee. If someone core the vic then the vic opsonize the jennee. If someone is described and they chase the jennee then they chase the vic. If someone opsonize the jennee then they are consummate. If the jennee opsonize the vic and the vic core the jennee then the vic is toadyish. If the vic reiterate the jennee then the jennee core the vic. If someone is cultivable then they chase the jennee. If the jennee opsonize the vic and the jennee is toadyish then the vic is neckless. The vic does not eat the jennee.", "logic": "\nCore(vic, jennee)\nReiterate(vic, jennee)\nReiterate(jennee, vic)\nforall x (Consummate(x) -> Core(x, jennee))\nforall x (Core(x, vic) -> Opsonize(vic, jennee))\nforall x (Described(x) and Core(x, jennee) -> Core(x, vic))\nforall x (Opsonize(x, jennee) -> Consummate(x))\nOpsonize(jennee, vic) and Core(vic, jennee) -> Toadyish(vic)\nReiterate(vic, jennee) -> Core(jennee, vic)\nforall x (Cultivable(x) -> Core(x, jennee))\nOpsonize(jennee, vic) and Toadyish(jennee) -> Neckless(vic)\n\nnot Opsonize(vic, jennee)\n\nReiterate(vic, jennee) and Reiterate(vic, jennee) -> Core(jennee, vic) -> therefore Core(jennee, vic) Core(jennee, vic) and forall x (Core(x, vic) -> Opsonize(vic, jennee)) -> therefore Opsonize(vic, jennee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The danit wrong the vail. The danit buckle the vail. The vail buckle the danit. If someone is eastside then they chase the vail. If someone wrong the danit then the danit sandblast the vail. If someone is labial and they chase the vail then they chase the danit. If someone sandblast the vail then they are eastside. If the vail sandblast the danit and the danit wrong the vail then the danit is darwinian. If the danit buckle the vail then the vail wrong the danit. If someone is apelike then they chase the vail. If the vail sandblast the danit and the vail is darwinian then the danit is nonlinear. The danit is eastside.", "logic": "\nWrong(danit, vail)\nBuckle(danit, vail)\nBuckle(vail, danit)\nforall x (Eastside(x) -> Wrong(x, vail))\nforall x (Wrong(x, danit) -> Sandblast(danit, vail))\nforall x (Labial(x) and Wrong(x, vail) -> Wrong(x, danit))\nforall x (Sandblast(x, vail) -> Eastside(x))\nSandblast(vail, danit) and Wrong(danit, vail) -> Darwinian(danit)\nBuckle(danit, vail) -> Wrong(vail, danit)\nforall x (Apelike(x) -> Wrong(x, vail))\nSandblast(vail, danit) and Darwinian(vail) -> Nonlinear(danit)\n\nEastside(danit)\n\nBuckle(danit, vail) and Buckle(danit, vail) -> Wrong(vail, danit) -> therefore Wrong(vail, danit) Wrong(vail, danit) and forall x (Wrong(x, danit) -> Sandblast(danit, vail)) -> therefore Sandblast(danit, vail) Sandblast(danit, vail) and forall x (Sandblast(x, vail) -> Eastside(x)) -> therefore Eastside(danit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The nedi cooperate the glen. The nedi outbid the glen. The glen outbid the nedi. If someone is apteral then they chase the glen. If someone cooperate the nedi then the nedi harness the glen. If someone is bolivian and they chase the glen then they chase the nedi. If someone harness the glen then they are apteral. If the glen harness the nedi and the nedi cooperate the glen then the nedi is shrinkable. If the nedi outbid the glen then the glen cooperate the nedi. If someone is editorial then they chase the glen. If the glen harness the nedi and the glen is shrinkable then the nedi is empty. The nedi is not apteral.", "logic": "\nCooperate(nedi, glen)\nOutbid(nedi, glen)\nOutbid(glen, nedi)\nforall x (Apteral(x) -> Cooperate(x, glen))\nforall x (Cooperate(x, nedi) -> Harness(nedi, glen))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Cooperate(x, glen) -> Cooperate(x, nedi))\nforall x (Harness(x, glen) -> Apteral(x))\nHarness(glen, nedi) and Cooperate(nedi, glen) -> Shrinkable(nedi)\nOutbid(nedi, glen) -> Cooperate(glen, nedi)\nforall x (Editorial(x) -> Cooperate(x, glen))\nHarness(glen, nedi) and Shrinkable(glen) -> Empty(nedi)\n\nnot Apteral(nedi)\n\nOutbid(nedi, glen) and Outbid(nedi, glen) -> Cooperate(glen, nedi) -> therefore Cooperate(glen, nedi) Cooperate(glen, nedi) and forall x (Cooperate(x, nedi) -> Harness(nedi, glen)) -> therefore Harness(nedi, glen) Harness(nedi, glen) and forall x (Harness(x, glen) -> Apteral(x)) -> therefore Apteral(nedi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The aeriela ration the tiffie. The aeriela callous the tiffie. The tiffie callous the aeriela. If someone is brute then they chase the tiffie. If someone ration the aeriela then the aeriela tyrannize the tiffie. If someone is teeny and they chase the tiffie then they chase the aeriela. If someone tyrannize the tiffie then they are brute. If the tiffie tyrannize the aeriela and the aeriela ration the tiffie then the aeriela is credible. If the aeriela callous the tiffie then the tiffie ration the aeriela. If someone is beechen then they chase the tiffie. If the tiffie tyrannize the aeriela and the tiffie is credible then the aeriela is entrenched. The tiffie is not brute.", "logic": "\nRation(aeriela, tiffie)\nCallous(aeriela, tiffie)\nCallous(tiffie, aeriela)\nforall x (Brute(x) -> Ration(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Ration(x, aeriela) -> Tyrannize(aeriela, tiffie))\nforall x (Teeny(x) and Ration(x, tiffie) -> Ration(x, aeriela))\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, tiffie) -> Brute(x))\nTyrannize(tiffie, aeriela) and Ration(aeriela, tiffie) -> Credible(aeriela)\nCallous(aeriela, tiffie) -> Ration(tiffie, aeriela)\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> Ration(x, tiffie))\nTyrannize(tiffie, aeriela) and Credible(tiffie) -> Entrenched(aeriela)\n\nnot Brute(tiffie)\n\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, tiffie) -> Brute(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The roice fete the son. The roice compromise the son. The son compromise the roice. If someone is reflected then they chase the son. If someone fete the roice then the roice manifold the son. If someone is skinless and they chase the son then they chase the roice. If someone manifold the son then they are reflected. If the son manifold the roice and the roice fete the son then the roice is whippy. If the roice compromise the son then the son fete the roice. If someone is sweeping then they chase the son. If the son manifold the roice and the son is whippy then the roice is brittle. The roice is whippy.", "logic": "\nFete(roice, son)\nCompromise(roice, son)\nCompromise(son, roice)\nforall x (Reflected(x) -> Fete(x, son))\nforall x (Fete(x, roice) -> Manifold(roice, son))\nforall x (Skinless(x) and Fete(x, son) -> Fete(x, roice))\nforall x (Manifold(x, son) -> Reflected(x))\nManifold(son, roice) and Fete(roice, son) -> Whippy(roice)\nCompromise(roice, son) -> Fete(son, roice)\nforall x (Sweeping(x) -> Fete(x, son))\nManifold(son, roice) and Whippy(son) -> Brittle(roice)\n\nWhippy(roice)\n\nManifold(son, roice) and Fete(roice, son) -> Whippy(roice) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The nahum deprave the friedrich. The nahum tutor the friedrich. The friedrich tutor the nahum. If someone is emboldened then they chase the friedrich. If someone deprave the nahum then the nahum note the friedrich. If someone is ungulated and they chase the friedrich then they chase the nahum. If someone note the friedrich then they are emboldened. If the friedrich note the nahum and the nahum deprave the friedrich then the nahum is surpliced. If the nahum tutor the friedrich then the friedrich deprave the nahum. If someone is wizened then they chase the friedrich. If the friedrich note the nahum and the friedrich is surpliced then the nahum is plantar. The nahum is not plantar.", "logic": "\nDeprave(nahum, friedrich)\nTutor(nahum, friedrich)\nTutor(friedrich, nahum)\nforall x (Emboldened(x) -> Deprave(x, friedrich))\nforall x (Deprave(x, nahum) -> Note(nahum, friedrich))\nforall x (Ungulated(x) and Deprave(x, friedrich) -> Deprave(x, nahum))\nforall x (Note(x, friedrich) -> Emboldened(x))\nNote(friedrich, nahum) and Deprave(nahum, friedrich) -> Surpliced(nahum)\nTutor(nahum, friedrich) -> Deprave(friedrich, nahum)\nforall x (Wizened(x) -> Deprave(x, friedrich))\nNote(friedrich, nahum) and Surpliced(friedrich) -> Plantar(nahum)\n\nnot Plantar(nahum)\n\nNote(friedrich, nahum) and Surpliced(friedrich) -> Plantar(nahum) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The marna fare the flower. The marna outdo the flower. The flower outdo the marna. If someone is nucleated then they chase the flower. If someone fare the marna then the marna amortise the flower. If someone is prayerful and they chase the flower then they chase the marna. If someone amortise the flower then they are nucleated. If the flower amortise the marna and the marna fare the flower then the marna is appetitive. If the marna outdo the flower then the flower fare the marna. If someone is prepared then they chase the flower. If the flower amortise the marna and the flower is appetitive then the marna is didactic. The flower fare the flower.", "logic": "\nFare(marna, flower)\nOutdo(marna, flower)\nOutdo(flower, marna)\nforall x (Nucleated(x) -> Fare(x, flower))\nforall x (Fare(x, marna) -> Amortise(marna, flower))\nforall x (Prayerful(x) and Fare(x, flower) -> Fare(x, marna))\nforall x (Amortise(x, flower) -> Nucleated(x))\nAmortise(flower, marna) and Fare(marna, flower) -> Appetitive(marna)\nOutdo(marna, flower) -> Fare(flower, marna)\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Fare(x, flower))\nAmortise(flower, marna) and Appetitive(flower) -> Didactic(marna)\n\nFare(flower, flower)\n\nforall x (Nucleated(x) -> Fare(x, flower)) <- forall x (Amortise(x, flower) -> Nucleated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The traver quack the stavros. The traver suckle the stavros. The stavros suckle the traver. If someone is carnal then they chase the stavros. If someone quack the traver then the traver interlard the stavros. If someone is susurrous and they chase the stavros then they chase the traver. If someone interlard the stavros then they are carnal. If the stavros interlard the traver and the traver quack the stavros then the traver is incredible. If the traver suckle the stavros then the stavros quack the traver. If someone is satisfied then they chase the stavros. If the stavros interlard the traver and the stavros is incredible then the traver is cannular. The stavros is not incredible.", "logic": "\nQuack(traver, stavros)\nSuckle(traver, stavros)\nSuckle(stavros, traver)\nforall x (Carnal(x) -> Quack(x, stavros))\nforall x (Quack(x, traver) -> Interlard(traver, stavros))\nforall x (Susurrous(x) and Quack(x, stavros) -> Quack(x, traver))\nforall x (Interlard(x, stavros) -> Carnal(x))\nInterlard(stavros, traver) and Quack(traver, stavros) -> Incredible(traver)\nSuckle(traver, stavros) -> Quack(stavros, traver)\nforall x (Satisfied(x) -> Quack(x, stavros))\nInterlard(stavros, traver) and Incredible(stavros) -> Cannular(traver)\n\nnot Incredible(stavros)\n\nnot Incredible(stavros) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The ahmed stream the devonne. The ahmed bulletin the devonne. The devonne bulletin the ahmed. If someone is unexampled then they chase the devonne. If someone stream the ahmed then the ahmed arraign the devonne. If someone is backstage and they chase the devonne then they chase the ahmed. If someone arraign the devonne then they are unexampled. If the devonne arraign the ahmed and the ahmed stream the devonne then the ahmed is medical. If the ahmed bulletin the devonne then the devonne stream the ahmed. If someone is autonomous then they chase the devonne. If the devonne arraign the ahmed and the devonne is medical then the ahmed is areolate. The ahmed arraign the ahmed.", "logic": "\nStream(ahmed, devonne)\nBulletin(ahmed, devonne)\nBulletin(devonne, ahmed)\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Stream(x, devonne))\nforall x (Stream(x, ahmed) -> Arraign(ahmed, devonne))\nforall x (Backstage(x) and Stream(x, devonne) -> Stream(x, ahmed))\nforall x (Arraign(x, devonne) -> Unexampled(x))\nArraign(devonne, ahmed) and Stream(ahmed, devonne) -> Medical(ahmed)\nBulletin(ahmed, devonne) -> Stream(devonne, ahmed)\nforall x (Autonomous(x) -> Stream(x, devonne))\nArraign(devonne, ahmed) and Medical(devonne) -> Areolate(ahmed)\n\nArraign(ahmed, ahmed)\n\nArraign(ahmed, ahmed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The micki wonder the orel. The micki eulogize the orel. The orel eulogize the micki. If someone is catamenial then they chase the orel. If someone wonder the micki then the micki booze the orel. If someone is caesarean and they chase the orel then they chase the micki. If someone booze the orel then they are catamenial. If the orel booze the micki and the micki wonder the orel then the micki is positivist. If the micki eulogize the orel then the orel wonder the micki. If someone is niggling then they chase the orel. If the orel booze the micki and the orel is positivist then the micki is veined. The micki does not need the micki.", "logic": "\nWonder(micki, orel)\nEulogize(micki, orel)\nEulogize(orel, micki)\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Wonder(x, orel))\nforall x (Wonder(x, micki) -> Booze(micki, orel))\nforall x (Caesarean(x) and Wonder(x, orel) -> Wonder(x, micki))\nforall x (Booze(x, orel) -> Catamenial(x))\nBooze(orel, micki) and Wonder(micki, orel) -> Positivist(micki)\nEulogize(micki, orel) -> Wonder(orel, micki)\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Wonder(x, orel))\nBooze(orel, micki) and Positivist(orel) -> Veined(micki)\n\nnot Eulogize(micki, micki)\n\nnot Eulogize(micki, micki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The pete freckle the mignon. The pete osculate the mignon. The mignon osculate the pete. If someone is plantar then they chase the mignon. If someone freckle the pete then the pete gnaw the mignon. If someone is saxon and they chase the mignon then they chase the pete. If someone gnaw the mignon then they are plantar. If the mignon gnaw the pete and the pete freckle the mignon then the pete is estranged. If the pete osculate the mignon then the mignon freckle the pete. If someone is brummagem then they chase the mignon. If the mignon gnaw the pete and the mignon is estranged then the pete is bayesian. The mignon is saxon.", "logic": "\nFreckle(pete, mignon)\nOsculate(pete, mignon)\nOsculate(mignon, pete)\nforall x (Plantar(x) -> Freckle(x, mignon))\nforall x (Freckle(x, pete) -> Gnaw(pete, mignon))\nforall x (Saxon(x) and Freckle(x, mignon) -> Freckle(x, pete))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, mignon) -> Plantar(x))\nGnaw(mignon, pete) and Freckle(pete, mignon) -> Estranged(pete)\nOsculate(pete, mignon) -> Freckle(mignon, pete)\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Freckle(x, mignon))\nGnaw(mignon, pete) and Estranged(mignon) -> Bayesian(pete)\n\nSaxon(mignon)\n\nSaxon(mignon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-62"} {"premises": "The cacilie is stray. The cacilie is assessable. The cacilie is pemphigous. The cacilie is actual. The cacilie is anagogical. If something is assessable then it is pemphigous. The cacilie is actual.", "logic": "\nStray(cacilie)\nAssessable(cacilie)\nPemphigous(cacilie)\nActual(cacilie)\nAnagogical(cacilie)\nforall x (Assessable(x) -> Pemphigous(x))\n\nActual(cacilie)\n\ntherefore Actual(cacilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2717"} {"premises": "The neron is content. The neron is hysterical. The neron is inharmonic. The neron is conductive. The neron is accretive. If something is hysterical then it is inharmonic. The neron is not hysterical.", "logic": "\nContent(neron)\nHysterical(neron)\nInharmonic(neron)\nConductive(neron)\nAccretive(neron)\nforall x (Hysterical(x) -> Inharmonic(x))\n\nnot Hysterical(neron)\n\ntherefore Hysterical(neron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2717"} {"premises": "The vernen is wingless. The vernen is trabecular. The vernen is attenuated. The vernen is headfirst. The vernen is rusted. If something is trabecular then it is attenuated. The vernen does not chase the vernen.", "logic": "\nWingless(vernen)\nTrabecular(vernen)\nAttenuated(vernen)\nHeadfirst(vernen)\nRusted(vernen)\nforall x (Trabecular(x) -> Attenuated(x))\n\nnot Chases(vernen, vernen)\n\nnot Chases(vernen, vernen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2717"} {"premises": "The jerrie is perigonal. The jerrie is refractory. The jerrie is empathetic. The jerrie is demode. The jerrie is unreserved. If something is refractory then it is empathetic. The jerrie needs the jerrie.", "logic": "\nPerigonal(jerrie)\nRefractory(jerrie)\nEmpathetic(jerrie)\nDemode(jerrie)\nUnreserved(jerrie)\nforall x (Refractory(x) -> Empathetic(x))\n\nNeeds(jerrie, jerrie)\n\nNeeds(jerrie, jerrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2717"} {"premises": "Izzy is aphetic. Grove is panoramic. Lowell is alular. Blue people are potted. If someone is aphetic then they are unextended. All unextended people are aphetic. If someone is aphetic and panoramic then they are skint. If someone is alular and skint then they are assorted. All panoramic people are unextended. If someone is potted then they are aphetic. All potted, panoramic people are alular. Grove is panoramic.", "logic": "\nAphetic(izzy)\nPanoramic(grove)\nAlular(lowell)\nforall x (Unextended(x) -> Potted(x))\nforall x (Aphetic(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Unextended(x) -> Aphetic(x))\nforall x (Aphetic(x) and Panoramic(x) -> Skint(x))\nforall x (Alular(x) and Skint(x) -> Assorted(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Potted(x) -> Aphetic(x))\nforall x (Potted(x) and Panoramic(x) -> Alular(x))\n\nPanoramic(grove)\n\ntherefore Panoramic(grove)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Jewelle is stylised. Shari is outlined. Charleen is manic. Blue people are mottled. If someone is stylised then they are committed. All committed people are stylised. If someone is stylised and outlined then they are tempting. If someone is manic and tempting then they are scaly. All outlined people are committed. If someone is mottled then they are stylised. All mottled, outlined people are manic. Shari is not outlined.", "logic": "\nStylised(jewelle)\nOutlined(shari)\nManic(charleen)\nforall x (Committed(x) -> Mottled(x))\nforall x (Stylised(x) -> Committed(x))\nforall x (Committed(x) -> Stylised(x))\nforall x (Stylised(x) and Outlined(x) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Manic(x) and Tempting(x) -> Scaly(x))\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> Committed(x))\nforall x (Mottled(x) -> Stylised(x))\nforall x (Mottled(x) and Outlined(x) -> Manic(x))\n\nnot Outlined(shari)\n\ntherefore Outlined(shari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Clifford is bondable. Esther is ghanaian. Ronnica is rippled. Blue people are columnlike. If someone is bondable then they are unbigoted. All unbigoted people are bondable. If someone is bondable and ghanaian then they are grateful. If someone is rippled and grateful then they are buffeted. All ghanaian people are unbigoted. If someone is columnlike then they are bondable. All columnlike, ghanaian people are rippled. Esther is unbigoted.", "logic": "\nBondable(clifford)\nGhanaian(esther)\nRippled(ronnica)\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Columnlike(x))\nforall x (Bondable(x) -> Unbigoted(x))\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Bondable(x) and Ghanaian(x) -> Grateful(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) and Grateful(x) -> Buffeted(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Unbigoted(x))\nforall x (Columnlike(x) -> Bondable(x))\nforall x (Columnlike(x) and Ghanaian(x) -> Rippled(x))\n\nUnbigoted(esther)\n\nGhanaian(esther) and forall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Unbigoted(x)) -> therefore Unbigoted(esther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Ikey is squashed. Estelle is lxiv. Mina is defensive. Blue people are meet. If someone is squashed then they are podlike. All podlike people are squashed. If someone is squashed and lxiv then they are cornish. If someone is defensive and cornish then they are fleshly. All lxiv people are podlike. If someone is meet then they are squashed. All meet, lxiv people are defensive. Estelle is not podlike.", "logic": "\nSquashed(ikey)\nLxiv(estelle)\nDefensive(mina)\nforall x (Podlike(x) -> Meet(x))\nforall x (Squashed(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Podlike(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Squashed(x) and Lxiv(x) -> Cornish(x))\nforall x (Defensive(x) and Cornish(x) -> Fleshly(x))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Meet(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Meet(x) and Lxiv(x) -> Defensive(x))\n\nnot Podlike(estelle)\n\nLxiv(estelle) and forall x (Lxiv(x) -> Podlike(x)) -> therefore Podlike(estelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Zollie is smoothbore. Aveline is detailed. Hallie is monstrous. Blue people are pronounced. If someone is smoothbore then they are delible. All delible people are smoothbore. If someone is smoothbore and detailed then they are numerable. If someone is monstrous and numerable then they are diffident. All detailed people are delible. If someone is pronounced then they are smoothbore. All pronounced, detailed people are monstrous. Aveline is smoothbore.", "logic": "\nSmoothbore(zollie)\nDetailed(aveline)\nMonstrous(hallie)\nforall x (Delible(x) -> Pronounced(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) -> Delible(x))\nforall x (Delible(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) and Detailed(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Monstrous(x) and Numerable(x) -> Diffident(x))\nforall x (Detailed(x) -> Delible(x))\nforall x (Pronounced(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Pronounced(x) and Detailed(x) -> Monstrous(x))\n\nSmoothbore(aveline)\n\nDetailed(aveline) and forall x (Detailed(x) -> Delible(x)) -> therefore Delible(aveline) Delible(aveline) and forall x (Delible(x) -> Smoothbore(x)) -> therefore Smoothbore(aveline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Cristen is tolerable. Tana is offending. Mariele is flooded. Blue people are extrovert. If someone is tolerable then they are straining. All straining people are tolerable. If someone is tolerable and offending then they are bursal. If someone is flooded and bursal then they are cephalic. All offending people are straining. If someone is extrovert then they are tolerable. All extrovert, offending people are flooded. Tana is not tolerable.", "logic": "\nTolerable(cristen)\nOffending(tana)\nFlooded(mariele)\nforall x (Straining(x) -> Extrovert(x))\nforall x (Tolerable(x) -> Straining(x))\nforall x (Straining(x) -> Tolerable(x))\nforall x (Tolerable(x) and Offending(x) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Flooded(x) and Bursal(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) -> Straining(x))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) -> Tolerable(x))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) and Offending(x) -> Flooded(x))\n\nnot Tolerable(tana)\n\nOffending(tana) and forall x (Offending(x) -> Straining(x)) -> therefore Straining(tana) Straining(tana) and forall x (Straining(x) -> Tolerable(x)) -> therefore Tolerable(tana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Marvin is assistant. Kessia is hebridean. Jayme is oscitant. Blue people are gardant. If someone is assistant then they are spatulate. All spatulate people are assistant. If someone is assistant and hebridean then they are chafed. If someone is oscitant and chafed then they are ghastly. All hebridean people are spatulate. If someone is gardant then they are assistant. All gardant, hebridean people are oscitant. Kessia is oscitant.", "logic": "\nAssistant(marvin)\nHebridean(kessia)\nOscitant(jayme)\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Gardant(x))\nforall x (Assistant(x) -> Spatulate(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Assistant(x))\nforall x (Assistant(x) and Hebridean(x) -> Chafed(x))\nforall x (Oscitant(x) and Chafed(x) -> Ghastly(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) -> Spatulate(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> Assistant(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) and Hebridean(x) -> Oscitant(x))\n\nOscitant(kessia)\n\nHebridean(kessia) and forall x (Hebridean(x) -> Spatulate(x)) -> therefore Spatulate(kessia) Spatulate(kessia) and forall x (Spatulate(x) -> Gardant(x)) -> therefore Gardant(kessia) Gardant(kessia) and Hebridean(kessia) and forall x (Gardant(x) and Hebridean(x) -> Oscitant(x)) -> therefore Oscitant(kessia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Godard is agitated. Delphine is spooky. Douglass is quadruplex. Blue people are sweetheart. If someone is agitated then they are tropic. All tropic people are agitated. If someone is agitated and spooky then they are wayfaring. If someone is quadruplex and wayfaring then they are variform. All spooky people are tropic. If someone is sweetheart then they are agitated. All sweetheart, spooky people are quadruplex. Delphine is not wayfaring.", "logic": "\nAgitated(godard)\nSpooky(delphine)\nQuadruplex(douglass)\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) -> Tropic(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Agitated(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) and Spooky(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Quadruplex(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Spooky(x) -> Tropic(x))\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) -> Agitated(x))\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) and Spooky(x) -> Quadruplex(x))\n\nnot Wayfaring(delphine)\n\nSpooky(delphine) and forall x (Spooky(x) -> Tropic(x)) -> therefore Tropic(delphine) Tropic(delphine) and forall x (Tropic(x) -> Agitated(x)) -> therefore Agitated(delphine) Agitated(delphine) and Spooky(delphine) and forall x (Agitated(x) and Spooky(x) -> Wayfaring(x)) -> therefore Wayfaring(delphine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Ede is eighteenth. Ravil is footless. Ricardo is burry. Blue people are antemortem. If someone is eighteenth then they are simulated. All simulated people are eighteenth. If someone is eighteenth and footless then they are laminar. If someone is burry and laminar then they are timorese. All footless people are simulated. If someone is antemortem then they are eighteenth. All antemortem, footless people are burry. Ricardo is not simulated.", "logic": "\nEighteenth(ede)\nFootless(ravil)\nBurry(ricardo)\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Eighteenth(x) -> Simulated(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Eighteenth(x))\nforall x (Eighteenth(x) and Footless(x) -> Laminar(x))\nforall x (Burry(x) and Laminar(x) -> Timorese(x))\nforall x (Footless(x) -> Simulated(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> Eighteenth(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) and Footless(x) -> Burry(x))\n\nnot Simulated(ricardo)\n\nforall x (Eighteenth(x) -> Simulated(x)) <- forall x (Antemortem(x) -> Eighteenth(x)) <- forall x (Simulated(x) -> Antemortem(x)) <- forall x (Footless(x) -> Simulated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Codee is acold. Karil is negligent. Drew is tattling. Blue people are alsatian. If someone is acold then they are graven. All graven people are acold. If someone is acold and negligent then they are savory. If someone is tattling and savory then they are unexplored. All negligent people are graven. If someone is alsatian then they are acold. All alsatian, negligent people are tattling. Drew is savory.", "logic": "\nAcold(codee)\nNegligent(karil)\nTattling(drew)\nforall x (Graven(x) -> Alsatian(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) -> Graven(x))\nforall x (Graven(x) -> Acold(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) and Negligent(x) -> Savory(x))\nforall x (Tattling(x) and Savory(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) -> Graven(x))\nforall x (Alsatian(x) -> Acold(x))\nforall x (Alsatian(x) and Negligent(x) -> Tattling(x))\n\nSavory(drew)\n\nforall x (Acold(x) and Negligent(x) -> Savory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Francois is seated. Alston is propertied. Edee is zippy. Blue people are homologic. If someone is seated then they are spirited. All spirited people are seated. If someone is seated and propertied then they are gladdened. If someone is zippy and gladdened then they are waste. All propertied people are spirited. If someone is homologic then they are seated. All homologic, propertied people are zippy. Francois is not waste.", "logic": "\nSeated(francois)\nPropertied(alston)\nZippy(edee)\nforall x (Spirited(x) -> Homologic(x))\nforall x (Seated(x) -> Spirited(x))\nforall x (Spirited(x) -> Seated(x))\nforall x (Seated(x) and Propertied(x) -> Gladdened(x))\nforall x (Zippy(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Waste(x))\nforall x (Propertied(x) -> Spirited(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Seated(x))\nforall x (Homologic(x) and Propertied(x) -> Zippy(x))\n\nnot Waste(francois)\n\nforall x (Zippy(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Waste(x)) <- forall x (Homologic(x) and Propertied(x) -> Zippy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Anetta is overcast. Gussi is eightieth. Jesselyn is senescent. Blue people are gustatory. If someone is overcast then they are worthwhile. All worthwhile people are overcast. If someone is overcast and eightieth then they are bully. If someone is senescent and bully then they are tenable. All eightieth people are worthwhile. If someone is gustatory then they are overcast. All gustatory, eightieth people are senescent. Jesselyn is gustatory.", "logic": "\nOvercast(anetta)\nEightieth(gussi)\nSenescent(jesselyn)\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Gustatory(x))\nforall x (Overcast(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Overcast(x) and Eightieth(x) -> Bully(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Bully(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Eightieth(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Gustatory(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Gustatory(x) and Eightieth(x) -> Senescent(x))\n\nGustatory(jesselyn)\n\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Gustatory(x)) <- forall x (Overcast(x) -> Worthwhile(x)) <- forall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Overcast(x)) <- forall x (Eightieth(x) -> Worthwhile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Caleb is gloomy. Shaylynn is swordlike. Clarice is atomistic. Blue people are lacrimal. If someone is gloomy then they are flatbottom. All flatbottom people are gloomy. If someone is gloomy and swordlike then they are fatalist. If someone is atomistic and fatalist then they are stellate. All swordlike people are flatbottom. If someone is lacrimal then they are gloomy. All lacrimal, swordlike people are atomistic. Clarice is not swordlike.", "logic": "\nGloomy(caleb)\nSwordlike(shaylynn)\nAtomistic(clarice)\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and Swordlike(x) -> Fatalist(x))\nforall x (Atomistic(x) and Fatalist(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Swordlike(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Swordlike(x) -> Atomistic(x))\n\nnot Swordlike(clarice)\n\nnot Swordlike(clarice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "Arliene is sedulous. Annette is myotonic. Urban is proscribed. Blue people are burrlike. If someone is sedulous then they are crowing. All crowing people are sedulous. If someone is sedulous and myotonic then they are mired. If someone is proscribed and mired then they are national. All myotonic people are crowing. If someone is burrlike then they are sedulous. All burrlike, myotonic people are proscribed. Arliene is myotonic.", "logic": "\nSedulous(arliene)\nMyotonic(annette)\nProscribed(urban)\nforall x (Crowing(x) -> Burrlike(x))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) -> Crowing(x))\nforall x (Crowing(x) -> Sedulous(x))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) and Myotonic(x) -> Mired(x))\nforall x (Proscribed(x) and Mired(x) -> National(x))\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Crowing(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) -> Sedulous(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) and Myotonic(x) -> Proscribed(x))\n\nMyotonic(arliene)\n\nMyotonic(arliene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1808"} {"premises": "The melly is barmy. The melly is allotted. The melly disrespect the regen. The melly whiteout the kary. The grove brace the melly. The grove brace the kary. The grove is barmy. The grove is vested. The regen does not eat the kary. The regen is barmy. The regen is vested. The regen is not allotted. The regen does not visit the grove. The kary brace the regen. The kary is barmy. The kary does not like the grove. If something whiteout the grove and the grove does not visit the kary then it brace the grove. If something brace the regen then it brace the grove. If something brace the melly then it is allotted. If the grove whiteout the regen then the regen disrespect the melly. If something disrespect the regen and it does not visit the melly then the melly brace the grove. If something brace the melly and it is allotted then it brace the regen. If the grove is barmy then the grove is inexorable. If something brace the melly then the melly brace the kary. The regen is vested.", "logic": "\nBarmy(melly)\nAllotted(melly)\nDisrespect(melly, regen)\nWhiteout(melly, kary)\nBrace(grove, melly)\nBrace(grove, kary)\nBarmy(grove)\nVested(grove)\nnot Brace(regen, kary)\nBarmy(regen)\nVested(regen)\nnot Allotted(regen)\nnot Whiteout(regen, grove)\nBrace(kary, regen)\nBarmy(kary)\nnot Disrespect(kary, grove)\nforall x (Whiteout(x, grove) and not Whiteout(grove, kary) -> Brace(x, grove))\nforall x (Brace(x, regen) -> Brace(x, grove))\nforall x (Brace(x, melly) -> Allotted(x))\nWhiteout(grove, regen) -> Disrespect(regen, melly)\nforall x (Disrespect(x, regen) and not Whiteout(x, melly) -> Brace(melly, grove))\nforall x (Brace(x, melly) and Allotted(x) -> Brace(x, regen))\nBarmy(grove) -> Inexorable(grove)\nforall x (Brace(x, melly) -> Brace(melly, kary))\n\nVested(regen)\n\ntherefore Vested(regen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The rayshell is biaural. The rayshell is elysian. The rayshell feed the elnora. The rayshell pleat the talbert. The griswold classicize the rayshell. The griswold classicize the talbert. The griswold is biaural. The griswold is bedrid. The elnora does not eat the talbert. The elnora is biaural. The elnora is bedrid. The elnora is not elysian. The elnora does not visit the griswold. The talbert classicize the elnora. The talbert is biaural. The talbert does not like the griswold. If something pleat the griswold and the griswold does not visit the talbert then it classicize the griswold. If something classicize the elnora then it classicize the griswold. If something classicize the rayshell then it is elysian. If the griswold pleat the elnora then the elnora feed the rayshell. If something feed the elnora and it does not visit the rayshell then the rayshell classicize the griswold. If something classicize the rayshell and it is elysian then it classicize the elnora. If the griswold is biaural then the griswold is pompous. If something classicize the rayshell then the rayshell classicize the talbert. The talbert does not eat the elnora.", "logic": "\nBiaural(rayshell)\nElysian(rayshell)\nFeed(rayshell, elnora)\nPleat(rayshell, talbert)\nClassicize(griswold, rayshell)\nClassicize(griswold, talbert)\nBiaural(griswold)\nBedrid(griswold)\nnot Classicize(elnora, talbert)\nBiaural(elnora)\nBedrid(elnora)\nnot Elysian(elnora)\nnot Pleat(elnora, griswold)\nClassicize(talbert, elnora)\nBiaural(talbert)\nnot Feed(talbert, griswold)\nforall x (Pleat(x, griswold) and not Pleat(griswold, talbert) -> Classicize(x, griswold))\nforall x (Classicize(x, elnora) -> Classicize(x, griswold))\nforall x (Classicize(x, rayshell) -> Elysian(x))\nPleat(griswold, elnora) -> Feed(elnora, rayshell)\nforall x (Feed(x, elnora) and not Pleat(x, rayshell) -> Classicize(rayshell, griswold))\nforall x (Classicize(x, rayshell) and Elysian(x) -> Classicize(x, elnora))\nBiaural(griswold) -> Pompous(griswold)\nforall x (Classicize(x, rayshell) -> Classicize(rayshell, talbert))\n\nnot Classicize(talbert, elnora)\n\ntherefore Classicize(talbert, elnora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The irena is epochal. The irena is parvenu. The irena power the chrissa. The irena acclaim the jada. The kittie avert the irena. The kittie avert the jada. The kittie is epochal. The kittie is algerian. The chrissa does not eat the jada. The chrissa is epochal. The chrissa is algerian. The chrissa is not parvenu. The chrissa does not visit the kittie. The jada avert the chrissa. The jada is epochal. The jada does not like the kittie. If something acclaim the kittie and the kittie does not visit the jada then it avert the kittie. If something avert the chrissa then it avert the kittie. If something avert the irena then it is parvenu. If the kittie acclaim the chrissa then the chrissa power the irena. If something power the chrissa and it does not visit the irena then the irena avert the kittie. If something avert the irena and it is parvenu then it avert the chrissa. If the kittie is epochal then the kittie is exclusive. If something avert the irena then the irena avert the jada. The kittie is exclusive.", "logic": "\nEpochal(irena)\nParvenu(irena)\nPower(irena, chrissa)\nAcclaim(irena, jada)\nAvert(kittie, irena)\nAvert(kittie, jada)\nEpochal(kittie)\nAlgerian(kittie)\nnot Avert(chrissa, jada)\nEpochal(chrissa)\nAlgerian(chrissa)\nnot Parvenu(chrissa)\nnot Acclaim(chrissa, kittie)\nAvert(jada, chrissa)\nEpochal(jada)\nnot Power(jada, kittie)\nforall x (Acclaim(x, kittie) and not Acclaim(kittie, jada) -> Avert(x, kittie))\nforall x (Avert(x, chrissa) -> Avert(x, kittie))\nforall x (Avert(x, irena) -> Parvenu(x))\nAcclaim(kittie, chrissa) -> Power(chrissa, irena)\nforall x (Power(x, chrissa) and not Acclaim(x, irena) -> Avert(irena, kittie))\nforall x (Avert(x, irena) and Parvenu(x) -> Avert(x, chrissa))\nEpochal(kittie) -> Exclusive(kittie)\nforall x (Avert(x, irena) -> Avert(irena, jada))\n\nExclusive(kittie)\n\nEpochal(kittie) and Epochal(kittie) -> Exclusive(kittie) -> therefore Exclusive(kittie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The ray is tenebrific. The ray is malted. The ray shirt the monroe. The ray forego the kerrill. The winnie scarify the ray. The winnie scarify the kerrill. The winnie is tenebrific. The winnie is civilian. The monroe does not eat the kerrill. The monroe is tenebrific. The monroe is civilian. The monroe is not malted. The monroe does not visit the winnie. The kerrill scarify the monroe. The kerrill is tenebrific. The kerrill does not like the winnie. If something forego the winnie and the winnie does not visit the kerrill then it scarify the winnie. If something scarify the monroe then it scarify the winnie. If something scarify the ray then it is malted. If the winnie forego the monroe then the monroe shirt the ray. If something shirt the monroe and it does not visit the ray then the ray scarify the winnie. If something scarify the ray and it is malted then it scarify the monroe. If the winnie is tenebrific then the winnie is faddy. If something scarify the ray then the ray scarify the kerrill. The ray does not eat the kerrill.", "logic": "\nTenebrific(ray)\nMalted(ray)\nShirt(ray, monroe)\nForego(ray, kerrill)\nScarify(winnie, ray)\nScarify(winnie, kerrill)\nTenebrific(winnie)\nCivilian(winnie)\nnot Scarify(monroe, kerrill)\nTenebrific(monroe)\nCivilian(monroe)\nnot Malted(monroe)\nnot Forego(monroe, winnie)\nScarify(kerrill, monroe)\nTenebrific(kerrill)\nnot Shirt(kerrill, winnie)\nforall x (Forego(x, winnie) and not Forego(winnie, kerrill) -> Scarify(x, winnie))\nforall x (Scarify(x, monroe) -> Scarify(x, winnie))\nforall x (Scarify(x, ray) -> Malted(x))\nForego(winnie, monroe) -> Shirt(monroe, ray)\nforall x (Shirt(x, monroe) and not Forego(x, ray) -> Scarify(ray, winnie))\nforall x (Scarify(x, ray) and Malted(x) -> Scarify(x, monroe))\nTenebrific(winnie) -> Faddy(winnie)\nforall x (Scarify(x, ray) -> Scarify(ray, kerrill))\n\nnot Scarify(ray, kerrill)\n\nScarify(winnie, ray) and forall x (Scarify(x, ray) -> Scarify(ray, kerrill)) -> therefore Scarify(ray, kerrill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The jobey is downhill. The jobey is infatuated. The jobey animalize the sallee. The jobey pray the neddie. The aeriel entrench the jobey. The aeriel entrench the neddie. The aeriel is downhill. The aeriel is matted. The sallee does not eat the neddie. The sallee is downhill. The sallee is matted. The sallee is not infatuated. The sallee does not visit the aeriel. The neddie entrench the sallee. The neddie is downhill. The neddie does not like the aeriel. If something pray the aeriel and the aeriel does not visit the neddie then it entrench the aeriel. If something entrench the sallee then it entrench the aeriel. If something entrench the jobey then it is infatuated. If the aeriel pray the sallee then the sallee animalize the jobey. If something animalize the sallee and it does not visit the jobey then the jobey entrench the aeriel. If something entrench the jobey and it is infatuated then it entrench the sallee. If the aeriel is downhill then the aeriel is naval. If something entrench the jobey then the jobey entrench the neddie. The aeriel entrench the sallee.", "logic": "\nDownhill(jobey)\nInfatuated(jobey)\nAnimalize(jobey, sallee)\nPray(jobey, neddie)\nEntrench(aeriel, jobey)\nEntrench(aeriel, neddie)\nDownhill(aeriel)\nMatted(aeriel)\nnot Entrench(sallee, neddie)\nDownhill(sallee)\nMatted(sallee)\nnot Infatuated(sallee)\nnot Pray(sallee, aeriel)\nEntrench(neddie, sallee)\nDownhill(neddie)\nnot Animalize(neddie, aeriel)\nforall x (Pray(x, aeriel) and not Pray(aeriel, neddie) -> Entrench(x, aeriel))\nforall x (Entrench(x, sallee) -> Entrench(x, aeriel))\nforall x (Entrench(x, jobey) -> Infatuated(x))\nPray(aeriel, sallee) -> Animalize(sallee, jobey)\nforall x (Animalize(x, sallee) and not Pray(x, jobey) -> Entrench(jobey, aeriel))\nforall x (Entrench(x, jobey) and Infatuated(x) -> Entrench(x, sallee))\nDownhill(aeriel) -> Naval(aeriel)\nforall x (Entrench(x, jobey) -> Entrench(jobey, neddie))\n\nEntrench(aeriel, sallee)\n\nEntrench(aeriel, jobey) and forall x (Entrench(x, jobey) -> Infatuated(x)) -> therefore Infatuated(aeriel) Entrench(aeriel, jobey) and Infatuated(aeriel) and forall x (Entrench(x, jobey) and Infatuated(x) -> Entrench(x, sallee)) -> therefore Entrench(aeriel, sallee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The rice is lexical. The rice is colorful. The rice modify the paule. The rice torment the phip. The phyllys doodle the rice. The phyllys doodle the phip. The phyllys is lexical. The phyllys is fencelike. The paule does not eat the phip. The paule is lexical. The paule is fencelike. The paule is not colorful. The paule does not visit the phyllys. The phip doodle the paule. The phip is lexical. The phip does not like the phyllys. If something torment the phyllys and the phyllys does not visit the phip then it doodle the phyllys. If something doodle the paule then it doodle the phyllys. If something doodle the rice then it is colorful. If the phyllys torment the paule then the paule modify the rice. If something modify the paule and it does not visit the rice then the rice doodle the phyllys. If something doodle the rice and it is colorful then it doodle the paule. If the phyllys is lexical then the phyllys is azotic. If something doodle the rice then the rice doodle the phip. The phyllys does not eat the paule.", "logic": "\nLexical(rice)\nColorful(rice)\nModify(rice, paule)\nTorment(rice, phip)\nDoodle(phyllys, rice)\nDoodle(phyllys, phip)\nLexical(phyllys)\nFencelike(phyllys)\nnot Doodle(paule, phip)\nLexical(paule)\nFencelike(paule)\nnot Colorful(paule)\nnot Torment(paule, phyllys)\nDoodle(phip, paule)\nLexical(phip)\nnot Modify(phip, phyllys)\nforall x (Torment(x, phyllys) and not Torment(phyllys, phip) -> Doodle(x, phyllys))\nforall x (Doodle(x, paule) -> Doodle(x, phyllys))\nforall x (Doodle(x, rice) -> Colorful(x))\nTorment(phyllys, paule) -> Modify(paule, rice)\nforall x (Modify(x, paule) and not Torment(x, rice) -> Doodle(rice, phyllys))\nforall x (Doodle(x, rice) and Colorful(x) -> Doodle(x, paule))\nLexical(phyllys) -> Azotic(phyllys)\nforall x (Doodle(x, rice) -> Doodle(rice, phip))\n\nnot Doodle(phyllys, paule)\n\nDoodle(phyllys, rice) and forall x (Doodle(x, rice) -> Colorful(x)) -> therefore Colorful(phyllys) Doodle(phyllys, rice) and Colorful(phyllys) and forall x (Doodle(x, rice) and Colorful(x) -> Doodle(x, paule)) -> therefore Doodle(phyllys, paule)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The ceil is centered. The ceil is carefree. The ceil iron the kirsten. The ceil disobey the stew. The wang tattoo the ceil. The wang tattoo the stew. The wang is centered. The wang is impeded. The kirsten does not eat the stew. The kirsten is centered. The kirsten is impeded. The kirsten is not carefree. The kirsten does not visit the wang. The stew tattoo the kirsten. The stew is centered. The stew does not like the wang. If something disobey the wang and the wang does not visit the stew then it tattoo the wang. If something tattoo the kirsten then it tattoo the wang. If something tattoo the ceil then it is carefree. If the wang disobey the kirsten then the kirsten iron the ceil. If something iron the kirsten and it does not visit the ceil then the ceil tattoo the wang. If something tattoo the ceil and it is carefree then it tattoo the kirsten. If the wang is centered then the wang is unwounded. If something tattoo the ceil then the ceil tattoo the stew. The wang tattoo the wang.", "logic": "\nCentered(ceil)\nCarefree(ceil)\nIron(ceil, kirsten)\nDisobey(ceil, stew)\nTattoo(wang, ceil)\nTattoo(wang, stew)\nCentered(wang)\nImpeded(wang)\nnot Tattoo(kirsten, stew)\nCentered(kirsten)\nImpeded(kirsten)\nnot Carefree(kirsten)\nnot Disobey(kirsten, wang)\nTattoo(stew, kirsten)\nCentered(stew)\nnot Iron(stew, wang)\nforall x (Disobey(x, wang) and not Disobey(wang, stew) -> Tattoo(x, wang))\nforall x (Tattoo(x, kirsten) -> Tattoo(x, wang))\nforall x (Tattoo(x, ceil) -> Carefree(x))\nDisobey(wang, kirsten) -> Iron(kirsten, ceil)\nforall x (Iron(x, kirsten) and not Disobey(x, ceil) -> Tattoo(ceil, wang))\nforall x (Tattoo(x, ceil) and Carefree(x) -> Tattoo(x, kirsten))\nCentered(wang) -> Unwounded(wang)\nforall x (Tattoo(x, ceil) -> Tattoo(ceil, stew))\n\nTattoo(wang, wang)\n\nTattoo(wang, ceil) and forall x (Tattoo(x, ceil) -> Carefree(x)) -> therefore Carefree(wang) Tattoo(wang, ceil) and Carefree(wang) and forall x (Tattoo(x, ceil) and Carefree(x) -> Tattoo(x, kirsten)) -> therefore Tattoo(wang, kirsten) Tattoo(wang, kirsten) and forall x (Tattoo(x, kirsten) -> Tattoo(x, wang)) -> therefore Tattoo(wang, wang)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The elise is insensible. The elise is diverging. The elise featherbed the marga. The elise ferret the stern. The davoud smile the elise. The davoud smile the stern. The davoud is insensible. The davoud is adorable. The marga does not eat the stern. The marga is insensible. The marga is adorable. The marga is not diverging. The marga does not visit the davoud. The stern smile the marga. The stern is insensible. The stern does not like the davoud. If something ferret the davoud and the davoud does not visit the stern then it smile the davoud. If something smile the marga then it smile the davoud. If something smile the elise then it is diverging. If the davoud ferret the marga then the marga featherbed the elise. If something featherbed the marga and it does not visit the elise then the elise smile the davoud. If something smile the elise and it is diverging then it smile the marga. If the davoud is insensible then the davoud is tangible. If something smile the elise then the elise smile the stern. The davoud does not eat the davoud.", "logic": "\nInsensible(elise)\nDiverging(elise)\nFeatherbed(elise, marga)\nFerret(elise, stern)\nSmile(davoud, elise)\nSmile(davoud, stern)\nInsensible(davoud)\nAdorable(davoud)\nnot Smile(marga, stern)\nInsensible(marga)\nAdorable(marga)\nnot Diverging(marga)\nnot Ferret(marga, davoud)\nSmile(stern, marga)\nInsensible(stern)\nnot Featherbed(stern, davoud)\nforall x (Ferret(x, davoud) and not Ferret(davoud, stern) -> Smile(x, davoud))\nforall x (Smile(x, marga) -> Smile(x, davoud))\nforall x (Smile(x, elise) -> Diverging(x))\nFerret(davoud, marga) -> Featherbed(marga, elise)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, marga) and not Ferret(x, elise) -> Smile(elise, davoud))\nforall x (Smile(x, elise) and Diverging(x) -> Smile(x, marga))\nInsensible(davoud) -> Tangible(davoud)\nforall x (Smile(x, elise) -> Smile(elise, stern))\n\nnot Smile(davoud, davoud)\n\nSmile(davoud, elise) and forall x (Smile(x, elise) -> Diverging(x)) -> therefore Diverging(davoud) Smile(davoud, elise) and Diverging(davoud) and forall x (Smile(x, elise) and Diverging(x) -> Smile(x, marga)) -> therefore Smile(davoud, marga) Smile(davoud, marga) and forall x (Smile(x, marga) -> Smile(x, davoud)) -> therefore Smile(davoud, davoud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The matti is doting. The matti is nontoxic. The matti uncrate the isaak. The matti career the katie. The rolando bluster the matti. The rolando bluster the katie. The rolando is doting. The rolando is hornlike. The isaak does not eat the katie. The isaak is doting. The isaak is hornlike. The isaak is not nontoxic. The isaak does not visit the rolando. The katie bluster the isaak. The katie is doting. The katie does not like the rolando. If something career the rolando and the rolando does not visit the katie then it bluster the rolando. If something bluster the isaak then it bluster the rolando. If something bluster the matti then it is nontoxic. If the rolando career the isaak then the isaak uncrate the matti. If something uncrate the isaak and it does not visit the matti then the matti bluster the rolando. If something bluster the matti and it is nontoxic then it bluster the isaak. If the rolando is doting then the rolando is acidotic. If something bluster the matti then the matti bluster the katie. The isaak does not like the matti.", "logic": "\nDoting(matti)\nNontoxic(matti)\nUncrate(matti, isaak)\nCareer(matti, katie)\nBluster(rolando, matti)\nBluster(rolando, katie)\nDoting(rolando)\nHornlike(rolando)\nnot Bluster(isaak, katie)\nDoting(isaak)\nHornlike(isaak)\nnot Nontoxic(isaak)\nnot Career(isaak, rolando)\nBluster(katie, isaak)\nDoting(katie)\nnot Uncrate(katie, rolando)\nforall x (Career(x, rolando) and not Career(rolando, katie) -> Bluster(x, rolando))\nforall x (Bluster(x, isaak) -> Bluster(x, rolando))\nforall x (Bluster(x, matti) -> Nontoxic(x))\nCareer(rolando, isaak) -> Uncrate(isaak, matti)\nforall x (Uncrate(x, isaak) and not Career(x, matti) -> Bluster(matti, rolando))\nforall x (Bluster(x, matti) and Nontoxic(x) -> Bluster(x, isaak))\nDoting(rolando) -> Acidotic(rolando)\nforall x (Bluster(x, matti) -> Bluster(matti, katie))\n\nnot Uncrate(isaak, matti)\n\nCareer(rolando, isaak) -> Uncrate(isaak, matti) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The valaria is smiling. The valaria is sassy. The valaria crouch the nance. The valaria burp the jimbo. The aldric guarantee the valaria. The aldric guarantee the jimbo. The aldric is smiling. The aldric is live. The nance does not eat the jimbo. The nance is smiling. The nance is live. The nance is not sassy. The nance does not visit the aldric. The jimbo guarantee the nance. The jimbo is smiling. The jimbo does not like the aldric. If something burp the aldric and the aldric does not visit the jimbo then it guarantee the aldric. If something guarantee the nance then it guarantee the aldric. If something guarantee the valaria then it is sassy. If the aldric burp the nance then the nance crouch the valaria. If something crouch the nance and it does not visit the valaria then the valaria guarantee the aldric. If something guarantee the valaria and it is sassy then it guarantee the nance. If the aldric is smiling then the aldric is unamended. If something guarantee the valaria then the valaria guarantee the jimbo. The valaria guarantee the aldric.", "logic": "\nSmiling(valaria)\nSassy(valaria)\nCrouch(valaria, nance)\nBurp(valaria, jimbo)\nGuarantee(aldric, valaria)\nGuarantee(aldric, jimbo)\nSmiling(aldric)\nLive(aldric)\nnot Guarantee(nance, jimbo)\nSmiling(nance)\nLive(nance)\nnot Sassy(nance)\nnot Burp(nance, aldric)\nGuarantee(jimbo, nance)\nSmiling(jimbo)\nnot Crouch(jimbo, aldric)\nforall x (Burp(x, aldric) and not Burp(aldric, jimbo) -> Guarantee(x, aldric))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, nance) -> Guarantee(x, aldric))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, valaria) -> Sassy(x))\nBurp(aldric, nance) -> Crouch(nance, valaria)\nforall x (Crouch(x, nance) and not Burp(x, valaria) -> Guarantee(valaria, aldric))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, valaria) and Sassy(x) -> Guarantee(x, nance))\nSmiling(aldric) -> Unamended(aldric)\nforall x (Guarantee(x, valaria) -> Guarantee(valaria, jimbo))\n\nGuarantee(valaria, aldric)\n\nforall x (Guarantee(x, nance) -> Guarantee(x, aldric)) <- forall x (Guarantee(x, valaria) and Sassy(x) -> Guarantee(x, nance)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The delly is gandhian. The delly is blamable. The delly polemize the trixie. The delly crunch the laurel. The bruno burthen the delly. The bruno burthen the laurel. The bruno is gandhian. The bruno is pensive. The trixie does not eat the laurel. The trixie is gandhian. The trixie is pensive. The trixie is not blamable. The trixie does not visit the bruno. The laurel burthen the trixie. The laurel is gandhian. The laurel does not like the bruno. If something crunch the bruno and the bruno does not visit the laurel then it burthen the bruno. If something burthen the trixie then it burthen the bruno. If something burthen the delly then it is blamable. If the bruno crunch the trixie then the trixie polemize the delly. If something polemize the trixie and it does not visit the delly then the delly burthen the bruno. If something burthen the delly and it is blamable then it burthen the trixie. If the bruno is gandhian then the bruno is parotid. If something burthen the delly then the delly burthen the laurel. The trixie does not eat the bruno.", "logic": "\nGandhian(delly)\nBlamable(delly)\nPolemize(delly, trixie)\nCrunch(delly, laurel)\nBurthen(bruno, delly)\nBurthen(bruno, laurel)\nGandhian(bruno)\nPensive(bruno)\nnot Burthen(trixie, laurel)\nGandhian(trixie)\nPensive(trixie)\nnot Blamable(trixie)\nnot Crunch(trixie, bruno)\nBurthen(laurel, trixie)\nGandhian(laurel)\nnot Polemize(laurel, bruno)\nforall x (Crunch(x, bruno) and not Crunch(bruno, laurel) -> Burthen(x, bruno))\nforall x (Burthen(x, trixie) -> Burthen(x, bruno))\nforall x (Burthen(x, delly) -> Blamable(x))\nCrunch(bruno, trixie) -> Polemize(trixie, delly)\nforall x (Polemize(x, trixie) and not Crunch(x, delly) -> Burthen(delly, bruno))\nforall x (Burthen(x, delly) and Blamable(x) -> Burthen(x, trixie))\nGandhian(bruno) -> Parotid(bruno)\nforall x (Burthen(x, delly) -> Burthen(delly, laurel))\n\nnot Burthen(trixie, bruno)\n\nforall x (Burthen(x, trixie) -> Burthen(x, bruno)) <- forall x (Burthen(x, delly) and Blamable(x) -> Burthen(x, trixie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The sully is vedic. The sully is intent. The sully oversleep the sabina. The sully verge the rorie. The viviyan frighten the sully. The viviyan frighten the rorie. The viviyan is vedic. The viviyan is windswept. The sabina does not eat the rorie. The sabina is vedic. The sabina is windswept. The sabina is not intent. The sabina does not visit the viviyan. The rorie frighten the sabina. The rorie is vedic. The rorie does not like the viviyan. If something verge the viviyan and the viviyan does not visit the rorie then it frighten the viviyan. If something frighten the sabina then it frighten the viviyan. If something frighten the sully then it is intent. If the viviyan verge the sabina then the sabina oversleep the sully. If something oversleep the sabina and it does not visit the sully then the sully frighten the viviyan. If something frighten the sully and it is intent then it frighten the sabina. If the viviyan is vedic then the viviyan is trendy. If something frighten the sully then the sully frighten the rorie. The sully frighten the sabina.", "logic": "\nVedic(sully)\nIntent(sully)\nOversleep(sully, sabina)\nVerge(sully, rorie)\nFrighten(viviyan, sully)\nFrighten(viviyan, rorie)\nVedic(viviyan)\nWindswept(viviyan)\nnot Frighten(sabina, rorie)\nVedic(sabina)\nWindswept(sabina)\nnot Intent(sabina)\nnot Verge(sabina, viviyan)\nFrighten(rorie, sabina)\nVedic(rorie)\nnot Oversleep(rorie, viviyan)\nforall x (Verge(x, viviyan) and not Verge(viviyan, rorie) -> Frighten(x, viviyan))\nforall x (Frighten(x, sabina) -> Frighten(x, viviyan))\nforall x (Frighten(x, sully) -> Intent(x))\nVerge(viviyan, sabina) -> Oversleep(sabina, sully)\nforall x (Oversleep(x, sabina) and not Verge(x, sully) -> Frighten(sully, viviyan))\nforall x (Frighten(x, sully) and Intent(x) -> Frighten(x, sabina))\nVedic(viviyan) -> Trendy(viviyan)\nforall x (Frighten(x, sully) -> Frighten(sully, rorie))\n\nFrighten(sully, sabina)\n\nforall x (Frighten(x, sully) and Intent(x) -> Frighten(x, sabina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The allina is nazarene. The allina is salt. The allina trounce the harmon. The allina prepose the emery. The sam connive the allina. The sam connive the emery. The sam is nazarene. The sam is archaic. The harmon does not eat the emery. The harmon is nazarene. The harmon is archaic. The harmon is not salt. The harmon does not visit the sam. The emery connive the harmon. The emery is nazarene. The emery does not like the sam. If something prepose the sam and the sam does not visit the emery then it connive the sam. If something connive the harmon then it connive the sam. If something connive the allina then it is salt. If the sam prepose the harmon then the harmon trounce the allina. If something trounce the harmon and it does not visit the allina then the allina connive the sam. If something connive the allina and it is salt then it connive the harmon. If the sam is nazarene then the sam is scathing. If something connive the allina then the allina connive the emery. The sam does not visit the emery.", "logic": "\nNazarene(allina)\nSalt(allina)\nTrounce(allina, harmon)\nPrepose(allina, emery)\nConnive(sam, allina)\nConnive(sam, emery)\nNazarene(sam)\nArchaic(sam)\nnot Connive(harmon, emery)\nNazarene(harmon)\nArchaic(harmon)\nnot Salt(harmon)\nnot Prepose(harmon, sam)\nConnive(emery, harmon)\nNazarene(emery)\nnot Trounce(emery, sam)\nforall x (Prepose(x, sam) and not Prepose(sam, emery) -> Connive(x, sam))\nforall x (Connive(x, harmon) -> Connive(x, sam))\nforall x (Connive(x, allina) -> Salt(x))\nPrepose(sam, harmon) -> Trounce(harmon, allina)\nforall x (Trounce(x, harmon) and not Prepose(x, allina) -> Connive(allina, sam))\nforall x (Connive(x, allina) and Salt(x) -> Connive(x, harmon))\nNazarene(sam) -> Scathing(sam)\nforall x (Connive(x, allina) -> Connive(allina, emery))\n\nnot Prepose(sam, emery)\n\nnot Prepose(sam, emery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The dolora is undulant. The dolora is pelvic. The dolora automate the sawyere. The dolora cocoon the alaine. The kakalina filch the dolora. The kakalina filch the alaine. The kakalina is undulant. The kakalina is regnant. The sawyere does not eat the alaine. The sawyere is undulant. The sawyere is regnant. The sawyere is not pelvic. The sawyere does not visit the kakalina. The alaine filch the sawyere. The alaine is undulant. The alaine does not like the kakalina. If something cocoon the kakalina and the kakalina does not visit the alaine then it filch the kakalina. If something filch the sawyere then it filch the kakalina. If something filch the dolora then it is pelvic. If the kakalina cocoon the sawyere then the sawyere automate the dolora. If something automate the sawyere and it does not visit the dolora then the dolora filch the kakalina. If something filch the dolora and it is pelvic then it filch the sawyere. If the kakalina is undulant then the kakalina is measly. If something filch the dolora then the dolora filch the alaine. The alaine automate the sawyere.", "logic": "\nUndulant(dolora)\nPelvic(dolora)\nAutomate(dolora, sawyere)\nCocoon(dolora, alaine)\nFilch(kakalina, dolora)\nFilch(kakalina, alaine)\nUndulant(kakalina)\nRegnant(kakalina)\nnot Filch(sawyere, alaine)\nUndulant(sawyere)\nRegnant(sawyere)\nnot Pelvic(sawyere)\nnot Cocoon(sawyere, kakalina)\nFilch(alaine, sawyere)\nUndulant(alaine)\nnot Automate(alaine, kakalina)\nforall x (Cocoon(x, kakalina) and not Cocoon(kakalina, alaine) -> Filch(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Filch(x, sawyere) -> Filch(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Filch(x, dolora) -> Pelvic(x))\nCocoon(kakalina, sawyere) -> Automate(sawyere, dolora)\nforall x (Automate(x, sawyere) and not Cocoon(x, dolora) -> Filch(dolora, kakalina))\nforall x (Filch(x, dolora) and Pelvic(x) -> Filch(x, sawyere))\nUndulant(kakalina) -> Measly(kakalina)\nforall x (Filch(x, dolora) -> Filch(dolora, alaine))\n\nAutomate(alaine, sawyere)\n\nAutomate(alaine, sawyere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The noe is amicable. The noe is separative. The noe jiggle the melinde. The noe datemark the karmen. The aaron scheme the noe. The aaron scheme the karmen. The aaron is amicable. The aaron is pulmonary. The melinde does not eat the karmen. The melinde is amicable. The melinde is pulmonary. The melinde is not separative. The melinde does not visit the aaron. The karmen scheme the melinde. The karmen is amicable. The karmen does not like the aaron. If something datemark the aaron and the aaron does not visit the karmen then it scheme the aaron. If something scheme the melinde then it scheme the aaron. If something scheme the noe then it is separative. If the aaron datemark the melinde then the melinde jiggle the noe. If something jiggle the melinde and it does not visit the noe then the noe scheme the aaron. If something scheme the noe and it is separative then it scheme the melinde. If the aaron is amicable then the aaron is boggy. If something scheme the noe then the noe scheme the karmen. The karmen does not visit the aaron.", "logic": "\nAmicable(noe)\nSeparative(noe)\nJiggle(noe, melinde)\nDatemark(noe, karmen)\nScheme(aaron, noe)\nScheme(aaron, karmen)\nAmicable(aaron)\nPulmonary(aaron)\nnot Scheme(melinde, karmen)\nAmicable(melinde)\nPulmonary(melinde)\nnot Separative(melinde)\nnot Datemark(melinde, aaron)\nScheme(karmen, melinde)\nAmicable(karmen)\nnot Jiggle(karmen, aaron)\nforall x (Datemark(x, aaron) and not Datemark(aaron, karmen) -> Scheme(x, aaron))\nforall x (Scheme(x, melinde) -> Scheme(x, aaron))\nforall x (Scheme(x, noe) -> Separative(x))\nDatemark(aaron, melinde) -> Jiggle(melinde, noe)\nforall x (Jiggle(x, melinde) and not Datemark(x, noe) -> Scheme(noe, aaron))\nforall x (Scheme(x, noe) and Separative(x) -> Scheme(x, melinde))\nAmicable(aaron) -> Boggy(aaron)\nforall x (Scheme(x, noe) -> Scheme(noe, karmen))\n\nnot Datemark(karmen, aaron)\n\nnot Datemark(karmen, aaron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The filide is thickset. The filide is buckram. The filide shower the rudiger. The filide carburize the camila. The saunder trail the filide. The saunder trail the camila. The saunder is thickset. The saunder is antithetic. The rudiger does not eat the camila. The rudiger is thickset. The rudiger is antithetic. The rudiger is not buckram. The rudiger does not visit the saunder. The camila trail the rudiger. The camila is thickset. The camila does not like the saunder. If something carburize the saunder and the saunder does not visit the camila then it trail the saunder. If something trail the rudiger then it trail the saunder. If something trail the filide then it is buckram. If the saunder carburize the rudiger then the rudiger shower the filide. If something shower the rudiger and it does not visit the filide then the filide trail the saunder. If something trail the filide and it is buckram then it trail the rudiger. If the saunder is thickset then the saunder is intermural. If something trail the filide then the filide trail the camila. The saunder shower the rudiger.", "logic": "\nThickset(filide)\nBuckram(filide)\nShower(filide, rudiger)\nCarburize(filide, camila)\nTrail(saunder, filide)\nTrail(saunder, camila)\nThickset(saunder)\nAntithetic(saunder)\nnot Trail(rudiger, camila)\nThickset(rudiger)\nAntithetic(rudiger)\nnot Buckram(rudiger)\nnot Carburize(rudiger, saunder)\nTrail(camila, rudiger)\nThickset(camila)\nnot Shower(camila, saunder)\nforall x (Carburize(x, saunder) and not Carburize(saunder, camila) -> Trail(x, saunder))\nforall x (Trail(x, rudiger) -> Trail(x, saunder))\nforall x (Trail(x, filide) -> Buckram(x))\nCarburize(saunder, rudiger) -> Shower(rudiger, filide)\nforall x (Shower(x, rudiger) and not Carburize(x, filide) -> Trail(filide, saunder))\nforall x (Trail(x, filide) and Buckram(x) -> Trail(x, rudiger))\nThickset(saunder) -> Intermural(saunder)\nforall x (Trail(x, filide) -> Trail(filide, camila))\n\nShower(saunder, rudiger)\n\nShower(saunder, rudiger) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "Lissi is uncertain. Lissi is surpliced. Lissi is acrobatic. Ric is augitic. Ric is surpliced. Allison is uncertain. Allison is not acrobatic. If Allison is distant and Allison is surpliced then Allison is weaponless. If something is acrobatic and not surpliced then it is uncertain. All weaponless, surpliced things are uncertain. If Lissi is not distant then Lissi is weaponless. Round things are augitic. White, uncertain things are weaponless. If something is uncertain then it is weaponless. If Ric is not acrobatic then Ric is weaponless. Lissi is surpliced.", "logic": "\nUncertain(lissi)\nSurpliced(lissi)\nAcrobatic(lissi)\nAugitic(ric)\nSurpliced(ric)\nUncertain(allison)\nnot Acrobatic(allison)\nDistant(allison) and Surpliced(allison) -> Weaponless(allison)\nforall x (Acrobatic(x) and not Surpliced(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Weaponless(x) and Surpliced(x) -> Uncertain(x))\nnot Distant(lissi) -> Weaponless(lissi)\nforall x (Nationwide(x) -> Augitic(x))\nforall x (Surpliced(x) and Uncertain(x) -> Weaponless(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Weaponless(x))\nnot Acrobatic(ric) -> Weaponless(ric)\n\nSurpliced(lissi)\n\ntherefore Surpliced(lissi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1497"} {"premises": "Katherine is cartesian. Katherine is fruity. Katherine is quickset. Hernando is strange. Hernando is fruity. Ruthe is cartesian. Ruthe is not quickset. If Ruthe is raiding and Ruthe is fruity then Ruthe is brainish. If something is quickset and not fruity then it is cartesian. All brainish, fruity things are cartesian. If Katherine is not raiding then Katherine is brainish. Round things are strange. White, cartesian things are brainish. If something is cartesian then it is brainish. If Hernando is not quickset then Hernando is brainish. Katherine is not fruity.", "logic": "\nCartesian(katherine)\nFruity(katherine)\nQuickset(katherine)\nStrange(hernando)\nFruity(hernando)\nCartesian(ruthe)\nnot Quickset(ruthe)\nRaiding(ruthe) and Fruity(ruthe) -> Brainish(ruthe)\nforall x (Quickset(x) and not Fruity(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Brainish(x) and Fruity(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nnot Raiding(katherine) -> Brainish(katherine)\nforall x (Haphazard(x) -> Strange(x))\nforall x (Fruity(x) and Cartesian(x) -> Brainish(x))\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Brainish(x))\nnot Quickset(hernando) -> Brainish(hernando)\n\nnot Fruity(katherine)\n\ntherefore Fruity(katherine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1497"} {"premises": "Marti is inexpert. Marti is versatile. Marti is boolean. Donielle is carotid. Donielle is versatile. Ofilia is inexpert. Ofilia is not boolean. If Ofilia is bedridden and Ofilia is versatile then Ofilia is adored. If something is boolean and not versatile then it is inexpert. All adored, versatile things are inexpert. If Marti is not bedridden then Marti is adored. Round things are carotid. White, inexpert things are adored. If something is inexpert then it is adored. If Donielle is not boolean then Donielle is adored. Donielle is not inexpert.", "logic": "\nInexpert(marti)\nVersatile(marti)\nBoolean(marti)\nCarotid(donielle)\nVersatile(donielle)\nInexpert(ofilia)\nnot Boolean(ofilia)\nBedridden(ofilia) and Versatile(ofilia) -> Adored(ofilia)\nforall x (Boolean(x) and not Versatile(x) -> Inexpert(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Versatile(x) -> Inexpert(x))\nnot Bedridden(marti) -> Adored(marti)\nforall x (Global(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Versatile(x) and Inexpert(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Inexpert(x) -> Adored(x))\nnot Boolean(donielle) -> Adored(donielle)\n\nnot Inexpert(donielle)\n\nforall x (Adored(x) and Versatile(x) -> Inexpert(x)) <- forall x (Versatile(x) and Inexpert(x) -> Adored(x)) <- forall x (Boolean(x) and not Versatile(x) -> Inexpert(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1497"} {"premises": "Bobbie is accessary. Bobbie is denotive. Bobbie is climbable. Giacomo is analogue. Giacomo is denotive. Tammy is accessary. Tammy is not climbable. If Tammy is mysterious and Tammy is denotive then Tammy is swingeing. If something is climbable and not denotive then it is accessary. All swingeing, denotive things are accessary. If Bobbie is not mysterious then Bobbie is swingeing. Round things are analogue. White, accessary things are swingeing. If something is accessary then it is swingeing. If Giacomo is not climbable then Giacomo is swingeing. Tammy is exploded.", "logic": "\nAccessary(bobbie)\nDenotive(bobbie)\nClimbable(bobbie)\nAnalogue(giacomo)\nDenotive(giacomo)\nAccessary(tammy)\nnot Climbable(tammy)\nMysterious(tammy) and Denotive(tammy) -> Swingeing(tammy)\nforall x (Climbable(x) and not Denotive(x) -> Accessary(x))\nforall x (Swingeing(x) and Denotive(x) -> Accessary(x))\nnot Mysterious(bobbie) -> Swingeing(bobbie)\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Analogue(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) and Accessary(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (Accessary(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nnot Climbable(giacomo) -> Swingeing(giacomo)\n\nExploded(tammy)\n\nExploded(tammy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1497"} {"premises": "Fidelia is sinewy. Fidelia is conclusive. Kari is tentative. Kari is atrophied. Winifield is atrophied. Bernete is tentative. Bernete is begotten. If something is tentative and terrifying then it is sinewy. All sinewy, terrifying things are begotten. All possessed, tentative things are conclusive. If Bernete is begotten then Bernete is conclusive. Smart things are begotten. If something is atrophied then it is sinewy. All begotten things are atrophied. If Bernete is tentative then Bernete is sinewy. Bernete is tentative.", "logic": "\nSinewy(fidelia)\nConclusive(fidelia)\nTentative(kari)\nAtrophied(kari)\nAtrophied(winifield)\nTentative(bernete)\nBegotten(bernete)\nforall x (Tentative(x) and Terrifying(x) -> Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Terrifying(x) -> Begotten(x))\nforall x (Possessed(x) and Tentative(x) -> Conclusive(x))\nBegotten(bernete) -> Conclusive(bernete)\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Begotten(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Begotten(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nTentative(bernete) -> Sinewy(bernete)\n\nTentative(bernete)\n\ntherefore Tentative(bernete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "Pam is oversewn. Pam is kookie. Gail is ruritanian. Gail is venezuelan. Urbano is venezuelan. Roddy is ruritanian. Roddy is witless. If something is ruritanian and laggard then it is oversewn. All oversewn, laggard things are witless. All unplanted, ruritanian things are kookie. If Roddy is witless then Roddy is kookie. Smart things are witless. If something is venezuelan then it is oversewn. All witless things are venezuelan. If Roddy is ruritanian then Roddy is oversewn. Roddy is not witless.", "logic": "\nOversewn(pam)\nKookie(pam)\nRuritanian(gail)\nVenezuelan(gail)\nVenezuelan(urbano)\nRuritanian(roddy)\nWitless(roddy)\nforall x (Ruritanian(x) and Laggard(x) -> Oversewn(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) and Laggard(x) -> Witless(x))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) and Ruritanian(x) -> Kookie(x))\nWitless(roddy) -> Kookie(roddy)\nforall x (Oversewn(x) -> Witless(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) -> Oversewn(x))\nforall x (Witless(x) -> Venezuelan(x))\nRuritanian(roddy) -> Oversewn(roddy)\n\nnot Witless(roddy)\n\ntherefore Witless(roddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "Livia is suited. Livia is jamaican. Kippie is ungeared. Kippie is polyatomic. Winifield is polyatomic. Delbert is ungeared. Delbert is frowzled. If something is ungeared and choragic then it is suited. All suited, choragic things are frowzled. All eighth, ungeared things are jamaican. If Delbert is frowzled then Delbert is jamaican. Smart things are frowzled. If something is polyatomic then it is suited. All frowzled things are polyatomic. If Delbert is ungeared then Delbert is suited. Kippie is suited.", "logic": "\nSuited(livia)\nJamaican(livia)\nUngeared(kippie)\nPolyatomic(kippie)\nPolyatomic(winifield)\nUngeared(delbert)\nFrowzled(delbert)\nforall x (Ungeared(x) and Choragic(x) -> Suited(x))\nforall x (Suited(x) and Choragic(x) -> Frowzled(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Ungeared(x) -> Jamaican(x))\nFrowzled(delbert) -> Jamaican(delbert)\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Frowzled(x))\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Suited(x))\nforall x (Frowzled(x) -> Polyatomic(x))\nUngeared(delbert) -> Suited(delbert)\n\nSuited(kippie)\n\nPolyatomic(kippie) and forall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Suited(x)) -> therefore Suited(kippie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "Maggi is serrate. Maggi is passable. Lurlene is classy. Lurlene is flaming. Maybelle is flaming. Kendre is classy. Kendre is pitiful. If something is classy and dandyish then it is serrate. All serrate, dandyish things are pitiful. All craven, classy things are passable. If Kendre is pitiful then Kendre is passable. Smart things are pitiful. If something is flaming then it is serrate. All pitiful things are flaming. If Kendre is classy then Kendre is serrate. Maybelle is not serrate.", "logic": "\nSerrate(maggi)\nPassable(maggi)\nClassy(lurlene)\nFlaming(lurlene)\nFlaming(maybelle)\nClassy(kendre)\nPitiful(kendre)\nforall x (Classy(x) and Dandyish(x) -> Serrate(x))\nforall x (Serrate(x) and Dandyish(x) -> Pitiful(x))\nforall x (Craven(x) and Classy(x) -> Passable(x))\nPitiful(kendre) -> Passable(kendre)\nforall x (Serrate(x) -> Pitiful(x))\nforall x (Flaming(x) -> Serrate(x))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> Flaming(x))\nClassy(kendre) -> Serrate(kendre)\n\nnot Serrate(maybelle)\n\nFlaming(maybelle) and forall x (Flaming(x) -> Serrate(x)) -> therefore Serrate(maybelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "Belinda is moderate. Belinda is atheistic. Lishe is plumbous. Lishe is telescopic. Hewe is telescopic. Salim is plumbous. Salim is fabulous. If something is plumbous and diamantine then it is moderate. All moderate, diamantine things are fabulous. All postal, plumbous things are atheistic. If Salim is fabulous then Salim is atheistic. Smart things are fabulous. If something is telescopic then it is moderate. All fabulous things are telescopic. If Salim is plumbous then Salim is moderate. Hewe is not atheistic.", "logic": "\nModerate(belinda)\nAtheistic(belinda)\nPlumbous(lishe)\nTelescopic(lishe)\nTelescopic(hewe)\nPlumbous(salim)\nFabulous(salim)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Diamantine(x) -> Moderate(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x) and Diamantine(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Postal(x) and Plumbous(x) -> Atheistic(x))\nFabulous(salim) -> Atheistic(salim)\nforall x (Moderate(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Telescopic(x) -> Moderate(x))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nPlumbous(salim) -> Moderate(salim)\n\nnot Atheistic(hewe)\n\nforall x (Postal(x) and Plumbous(x) -> Atheistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "Elwira is clownlike. Elwira is stated. Trix is befogged. Trix is saxatile. Gavrielle is saxatile. Steve is befogged. Steve is unsigned. If something is befogged and inpouring then it is clownlike. All clownlike, inpouring things are unsigned. All inclusive, befogged things are stated. If Steve is unsigned then Steve is stated. Smart things are unsigned. If something is saxatile then it is clownlike. All unsigned things are saxatile. If Steve is befogged then Steve is clownlike. Trix is stated.", "logic": "\nClownlike(elwira)\nStated(elwira)\nBefogged(trix)\nSaxatile(trix)\nSaxatile(gavrielle)\nBefogged(steve)\nUnsigned(steve)\nforall x (Befogged(x) and Inpouring(x) -> Clownlike(x))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) and Inpouring(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Inclusive(x) and Befogged(x) -> Stated(x))\nUnsigned(steve) -> Stated(steve)\nforall x (Clownlike(x) -> Unsigned(x))\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Clownlike(x))\nforall x (Unsigned(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nBefogged(steve) -> Clownlike(steve)\n\nStated(trix)\n\nforall x (Inclusive(x) and Befogged(x) -> Stated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "Monica is staminate. Monica is seminal. Lissie is grasslike. Lissie is hazardous. Sidoney is hazardous. Laurella is grasslike. Laurella is flyspeck. If something is grasslike and abysmal then it is staminate. All staminate, abysmal things are flyspeck. All iterative, grasslike things are seminal. If Laurella is flyspeck then Laurella is seminal. Smart things are flyspeck. If something is hazardous then it is staminate. All flyspeck things are hazardous. If Laurella is grasslike then Laurella is staminate. Lissie is not abysmal.", "logic": "\nStaminate(monica)\nSeminal(monica)\nGrasslike(lissie)\nHazardous(lissie)\nHazardous(sidoney)\nGrasslike(laurella)\nFlyspeck(laurella)\nforall x (Grasslike(x) and Abysmal(x) -> Staminate(x))\nforall x (Staminate(x) and Abysmal(x) -> Flyspeck(x))\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Grasslike(x) -> Seminal(x))\nFlyspeck(laurella) -> Seminal(laurella)\nforall x (Staminate(x) -> Flyspeck(x))\nforall x (Hazardous(x) -> Staminate(x))\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Hazardous(x))\nGrasslike(laurella) -> Staminate(laurella)\n\nnot Abysmal(lissie)\n\nnot Abysmal(lissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "Saunders is attractive. Saunders is somnolent. Heinrich is lxxiii. Heinrich is doubting. Berget is doubting. Avivah is lxxiii. Avivah is saute. If something is lxxiii and southbound then it is attractive. All attractive, southbound things are saute. All unremarked, lxxiii things are somnolent. If Avivah is saute then Avivah is somnolent. Smart things are saute. If something is doubting then it is attractive. All saute things are doubting. If Avivah is lxxiii then Avivah is attractive. Saunders is southbound.", "logic": "\nAttractive(saunders)\nSomnolent(saunders)\nLxxiii(heinrich)\nDoubting(heinrich)\nDoubting(berget)\nLxxiii(avivah)\nSaute(avivah)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and Southbound(x) -> Attractive(x))\nforall x (Attractive(x) and Southbound(x) -> Saute(x))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) and Lxxiii(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nSaute(avivah) -> Somnolent(avivah)\nforall x (Attractive(x) -> Saute(x))\nforall x (Doubting(x) -> Attractive(x))\nforall x (Saute(x) -> Doubting(x))\nLxxiii(avivah) -> Attractive(avivah)\n\nSouthbound(saunders)\n\nSouthbound(saunders) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-571"} {"premises": "The judye is grateful. The bonita is grateful. If something is assuasive then it is uncomely. If something excuse the bonita and the bonita woolgather the judye then it is sovereign. If something woolgather the bonita then the bonita notice the judye. If something is uncomely then it excuse the judye. If something excuse the judye then it woolgather the judye. All grateful things are lingulate. If something is uncomely and it woolgather the judye then it is lingulate. If something is grateful then it is uncomely. The bonita is grateful.", "logic": "\nGrateful(judye)\nGrateful(bonita)\nforall x (Assuasive(x) -> Uncomely(x))\nforall x (Excuse(x, bonita) and Woolgather(bonita, judye) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Woolgather(x, bonita) -> Notice(bonita, judye))\nforall x (Uncomely(x) -> Excuse(x, judye))\nforall x (Excuse(x, judye) -> Woolgather(x, judye))\nforall x (Grateful(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Uncomely(x) and Woolgather(x, judye) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Grateful(x) -> Uncomely(x))\n\nGrateful(bonita)\n\ntherefore Grateful(bonita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The dawna is markovian. The mario is markovian. If something is upraised then it is invading. If something overfill the mario and the mario outsource the dawna then it is percipient. If something outsource the mario then the mario specialise the dawna. If something is invading then it overfill the dawna. If something overfill the dawna then it outsource the dawna. All markovian things are inbuilt. If something is invading and it outsource the dawna then it is inbuilt. If something is markovian then it is invading. The dawna is not markovian.", "logic": "\nMarkovian(dawna)\nMarkovian(mario)\nforall x (Upraised(x) -> Invading(x))\nforall x (Overfill(x, mario) and Outsource(mario, dawna) -> Percipient(x))\nforall x (Outsource(x, mario) -> Specialise(mario, dawna))\nforall x (Invading(x) -> Overfill(x, dawna))\nforall x (Overfill(x, dawna) -> Outsource(x, dawna))\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\nforall x (Invading(x) and Outsource(x, dawna) -> Inbuilt(x))\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Invading(x))\n\nnot Markovian(dawna)\n\ntherefore Markovian(dawna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The abbot is foaming. The baron is foaming. If something is spangled then it is palpatory. If something recap the baron and the baron mine the abbot then it is beaded. If something mine the baron then the baron gather the abbot. If something is palpatory then it recap the abbot. If something recap the abbot then it mine the abbot. All foaming things are bantam. If something is palpatory and it mine the abbot then it is bantam. If something is foaming then it is palpatory. The abbot is palpatory.", "logic": "\nFoaming(abbot)\nFoaming(baron)\nforall x (Spangled(x) -> Palpatory(x))\nforall x (Recap(x, baron) and Mine(baron, abbot) -> Beaded(x))\nforall x (Mine(x, baron) -> Gather(baron, abbot))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) -> Recap(x, abbot))\nforall x (Recap(x, abbot) -> Mine(x, abbot))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Bantam(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Mine(x, abbot) -> Bantam(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Palpatory(x))\n\nPalpatory(abbot)\n\nFoaming(abbot) and forall x (Foaming(x) -> Palpatory(x)) -> therefore Palpatory(abbot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The taddeus is trilingual. The madelon is trilingual. If something is acute then it is tympanitic. If something outrank the madelon and the madelon autotomise the taddeus then it is pally. If something autotomise the madelon then the madelon forsake the taddeus. If something is tympanitic then it outrank the taddeus. If something outrank the taddeus then it autotomise the taddeus. All trilingual things are bowery. If something is tympanitic and it autotomise the taddeus then it is bowery. If something is trilingual then it is tympanitic. The taddeus is not tympanitic.", "logic": "\nTrilingual(taddeus)\nTrilingual(madelon)\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Tympanitic(x))\nforall x (Outrank(x, madelon) and Autotomise(madelon, taddeus) -> Pally(x))\nforall x (Autotomise(x, madelon) -> Forsake(madelon, taddeus))\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Outrank(x, taddeus))\nforall x (Outrank(x, taddeus) -> Autotomise(x, taddeus))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) and Autotomise(x, taddeus) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) -> Tympanitic(x))\n\nnot Tympanitic(taddeus)\n\nTrilingual(taddeus) and forall x (Trilingual(x) -> Tympanitic(x)) -> therefore Tympanitic(taddeus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The arlinda is arrhythmic. The aldis is arrhythmic. If something is validating then it is shuha. If something metricise the aldis and the aldis mean the arlinda then it is volatile. If something mean the aldis then the aldis razz the arlinda. If something is shuha then it metricise the arlinda. If something metricise the arlinda then it mean the arlinda. All arrhythmic things are slithery. If something is shuha and it mean the arlinda then it is slithery. If something is arrhythmic then it is shuha. The aldis metricise the arlinda.", "logic": "\nArrhythmic(arlinda)\nArrhythmic(aldis)\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Shuha(x))\nforall x (Metricise(x, aldis) and Mean(aldis, arlinda) -> Volatile(x))\nforall x (Mean(x, aldis) -> Razz(aldis, arlinda))\nforall x (Shuha(x) -> Metricise(x, arlinda))\nforall x (Metricise(x, arlinda) -> Mean(x, arlinda))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Shuha(x) and Mean(x, arlinda) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) -> Shuha(x))\n\nMetricise(aldis, arlinda)\n\nArrhythmic(aldis) and forall x (Arrhythmic(x) -> Shuha(x)) -> therefore Shuha(aldis) Shuha(aldis) and forall x (Shuha(x) -> Metricise(x, arlinda)) -> therefore Metricise(aldis, arlinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The shayla is wedded. The allyson is wedded. If something is donnish then it is infeasible. If something fluoridize the allyson and the allyson install the shayla then it is matey. If something install the allyson then the allyson cuckold the shayla. If something is infeasible then it fluoridize the shayla. If something fluoridize the shayla then it install the shayla. All wedded things are basaltic. If something is infeasible and it install the shayla then it is basaltic. If something is wedded then it is infeasible. The shayla does not visit the shayla.", "logic": "\nWedded(shayla)\nWedded(allyson)\nforall x (Donnish(x) -> Infeasible(x))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, allyson) and Install(allyson, shayla) -> Matey(x))\nforall x (Install(x, allyson) -> Cuckold(allyson, shayla))\nforall x (Infeasible(x) -> Fluoridize(x, shayla))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, shayla) -> Install(x, shayla))\nforall x (Wedded(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Infeasible(x) and Install(x, shayla) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Wedded(x) -> Infeasible(x))\n\nnot Fluoridize(shayla, shayla)\n\nWedded(shayla) and forall x (Wedded(x) -> Infeasible(x)) -> therefore Infeasible(shayla) Infeasible(shayla) and forall x (Infeasible(x) -> Fluoridize(x, shayla)) -> therefore Fluoridize(shayla, shayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The leighton is maximising. The ellsworth is maximising. If something is fungible then it is chimeric. If something spade the ellsworth and the ellsworth limp the leighton then it is whippy. If something limp the ellsworth then the ellsworth blaspheme the leighton. If something is chimeric then it spade the leighton. If something spade the leighton then it limp the leighton. All maximising things are aching. If something is chimeric and it limp the leighton then it is aching. If something is maximising then it is chimeric. The ellsworth limp the leighton.", "logic": "\nMaximising(leighton)\nMaximising(ellsworth)\nforall x (Fungible(x) -> Chimeric(x))\nforall x (Spade(x, ellsworth) and Limp(ellsworth, leighton) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Limp(x, ellsworth) -> Blaspheme(ellsworth, leighton))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Spade(x, leighton))\nforall x (Spade(x, leighton) -> Limp(x, leighton))\nforall x (Maximising(x) -> Aching(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) and Limp(x, leighton) -> Aching(x))\nforall x (Maximising(x) -> Chimeric(x))\n\nLimp(ellsworth, leighton)\n\nMaximising(ellsworth) and forall x (Maximising(x) -> Chimeric(x)) -> therefore Chimeric(ellsworth) Chimeric(ellsworth) and forall x (Chimeric(x) -> Spade(x, leighton)) -> therefore Spade(ellsworth, leighton) Spade(ellsworth, leighton) and forall x (Spade(x, leighton) -> Limp(x, leighton)) -> therefore Limp(ellsworth, leighton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The jerrome is casual. The caleb is casual. If something is fatigued then it is gratified. If something underbid the caleb and the caleb fluctuate the jerrome then it is covert. If something fluctuate the caleb then the caleb haze the jerrome. If something is gratified then it underbid the jerrome. If something underbid the jerrome then it fluctuate the jerrome. All casual things are colorless. If something is gratified and it fluctuate the jerrome then it is colorless. If something is casual then it is gratified. The caleb does not need the jerrome.", "logic": "\nCasual(jerrome)\nCasual(caleb)\nforall x (Fatigued(x) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Underbid(x, caleb) and Fluctuate(caleb, jerrome) -> Covert(x))\nforall x (Fluctuate(x, caleb) -> Haze(caleb, jerrome))\nforall x (Gratified(x) -> Underbid(x, jerrome))\nforall x (Underbid(x, jerrome) -> Fluctuate(x, jerrome))\nforall x (Casual(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Gratified(x) and Fluctuate(x, jerrome) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Casual(x) -> Gratified(x))\n\nnot Fluctuate(caleb, jerrome)\n\nCasual(caleb) and forall x (Casual(x) -> Gratified(x)) -> therefore Gratified(caleb) Gratified(caleb) and forall x (Gratified(x) -> Underbid(x, jerrome)) -> therefore Underbid(caleb, jerrome) Underbid(caleb, jerrome) and forall x (Underbid(x, jerrome) -> Fluctuate(x, jerrome)) -> therefore Fluctuate(caleb, jerrome)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The zerk is abridged. The jackelyn is abridged. If something is titillated then it is suspect. If something obscure the jackelyn and the jackelyn voyage the zerk then it is sleeping. If something voyage the jackelyn then the jackelyn brief the zerk. If something is suspect then it obscure the zerk. If something obscure the zerk then it voyage the zerk. All abridged things are diagnostic. If something is suspect and it voyage the zerk then it is diagnostic. If something is abridged then it is suspect. The zerk is not sleeping.", "logic": "\nAbridged(zerk)\nAbridged(jackelyn)\nforall x (Titillated(x) -> Suspect(x))\nforall x (Obscure(x, jackelyn) and Voyage(jackelyn, zerk) -> Sleeping(x))\nforall x (Voyage(x, jackelyn) -> Brief(jackelyn, zerk))\nforall x (Suspect(x) -> Obscure(x, zerk))\nforall x (Obscure(x, zerk) -> Voyage(x, zerk))\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Diagnostic(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x) and Voyage(x, zerk) -> Diagnostic(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) -> Suspect(x))\n\nnot Sleeping(zerk)\n\nforall x (Obscure(x, jackelyn) and Voyage(jackelyn, zerk) -> Sleeping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The wain is pointless. The rickey is pointless. If something is trancelike then it is woeful. If something spread the rickey and the rickey postpone the wain then it is optimum. If something postpone the rickey then the rickey bald the wain. If something is woeful then it spread the wain. If something spread the wain then it postpone the wain. All pointless things are cleanable. If something is woeful and it postpone the wain then it is cleanable. If something is pointless then it is woeful. The rickey is optimum.", "logic": "\nPointless(wain)\nPointless(rickey)\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Woeful(x))\nforall x (Spread(x, rickey) and Postpone(rickey, wain) -> Optimum(x))\nforall x (Postpone(x, rickey) -> Bald(rickey, wain))\nforall x (Woeful(x) -> Spread(x, wain))\nforall x (Spread(x, wain) -> Postpone(x, wain))\nforall x (Pointless(x) -> Cleanable(x))\nforall x (Woeful(x) and Postpone(x, wain) -> Cleanable(x))\nforall x (Pointless(x) -> Woeful(x))\n\nOptimum(rickey)\n\nforall x (Spread(x, rickey) and Postpone(rickey, wain) -> Optimum(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The eba is abrasive. The albrecht is abrasive. If something is foolhardy then it is unscathed. If something moisten the albrecht and the albrecht immigrate the eba then it is solomonic. If something immigrate the albrecht then the albrecht depolarize the eba. If something is unscathed then it moisten the eba. If something moisten the eba then it immigrate the eba. All abrasive things are prox. If something is unscathed and it immigrate the eba then it is prox. If something is abrasive then it is unscathed. The albrecht does not see the eba.", "logic": "\nAbrasive(eba)\nAbrasive(albrecht)\nforall x (Foolhardy(x) -> Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Moisten(x, albrecht) and Immigrate(albrecht, eba) -> Solomonic(x))\nforall x (Immigrate(x, albrecht) -> Depolarize(albrecht, eba))\nforall x (Unscathed(x) -> Moisten(x, eba))\nforall x (Moisten(x, eba) -> Immigrate(x, eba))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) -> Prox(x))\nforall x (Unscathed(x) and Immigrate(x, eba) -> Prox(x))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) -> Unscathed(x))\n\nnot Depolarize(albrecht, eba)\n\nforall x (Immigrate(x, albrecht) -> Depolarize(albrecht, eba)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The maible is dogged. The danila is dogged. If something is tipsy then it is chummy. If something kern the danila and the danila plough the maible then it is moated. If something plough the danila then the danila fall the maible. If something is chummy then it kern the maible. If something kern the maible then it plough the maible. All dogged things are puckish. If something is chummy and it plough the maible then it is puckish. If something is dogged then it is chummy. The maible fall the danila.", "logic": "\nDogged(maible)\nDogged(danila)\nforall x (Tipsy(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Kern(x, danila) and Plough(danila, maible) -> Moated(x))\nforall x (Plough(x, danila) -> Fall(danila, maible))\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Kern(x, maible))\nforall x (Kern(x, maible) -> Plough(x, maible))\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and Plough(x, maible) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Chummy(x))\n\nFall(maible, danila)\n\nFall(maible, danila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The cosetta is confluent. The jules is confluent. If something is sclerotic then it is ilxxx. If something crock the jules and the jules retrofit the cosetta then it is figured. If something retrofit the jules then the jules cannon the cosetta. If something is ilxxx then it crock the cosetta. If something crock the cosetta then it retrofit the cosetta. All confluent things are beady. If something is ilxxx and it retrofit the cosetta then it is beady. If something is confluent then it is ilxxx. The jules does not need the jules.", "logic": "\nConfluent(cosetta)\nConfluent(jules)\nforall x (Sclerotic(x) -> Ilxxx(x))\nforall x (Crock(x, jules) and Retrofit(jules, cosetta) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, jules) -> Cannon(jules, cosetta))\nforall x (Ilxxx(x) -> Crock(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Crock(x, cosetta) -> Retrofit(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Confluent(x) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Ilxxx(x) and Retrofit(x, cosetta) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Confluent(x) -> Ilxxx(x))\n\nnot Retrofit(jules, jules)\n\nnot Retrofit(jules, jules) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The ofelia is basilican. The tyrus is basilican. If something is vermillion then it is quavering. If something rive the tyrus and the tyrus redirect the ofelia then it is stinting. If something redirect the tyrus then the tyrus snicker the ofelia. If something is quavering then it rive the ofelia. If something rive the ofelia then it redirect the ofelia. All basilican things are manifold. If something is quavering and it redirect the ofelia then it is manifold. If something is basilican then it is quavering. The tyrus is vermillion.", "logic": "\nBasilican(ofelia)\nBasilican(tyrus)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Rive(x, tyrus) and Redirect(tyrus, ofelia) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Redirect(x, tyrus) -> Snicker(tyrus, ofelia))\nforall x (Quavering(x) -> Rive(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Rive(x, ofelia) -> Redirect(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Basilican(x) -> Manifold(x))\nforall x (Quavering(x) and Redirect(x, ofelia) -> Manifold(x))\nforall x (Basilican(x) -> Quavering(x))\n\nVermillion(tyrus)\n\nVermillion(tyrus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The sharl is homeless. The dalila is homeless. If something is mistaken then it is stated. If something refund the dalila and the dalila bloody the sharl then it is dehydrated. If something bloody the dalila then the dalila redesign the sharl. If something is stated then it refund the sharl. If something refund the sharl then it bloody the sharl. All homeless things are homicidal. If something is stated and it bloody the sharl then it is homicidal. If something is homeless then it is stated. The dalila does not see the dalila.", "logic": "\nHomeless(sharl)\nHomeless(dalila)\nforall x (Mistaken(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (Refund(x, dalila) and Bloody(dalila, sharl) -> Dehydrated(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x, dalila) -> Redesign(dalila, sharl))\nforall x (Stated(x) -> Refund(x, sharl))\nforall x (Refund(x, sharl) -> Bloody(x, sharl))\nforall x (Homeless(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Stated(x) and Bloody(x, sharl) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Homeless(x) -> Stated(x))\n\nnot Redesign(dalila, dalila)\n\nnot Redesign(dalila, dalila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The ina is german. The denni is german. If something is alated then it is subscript. If something segue the denni and the denni nail the ina then it is handleless. If something nail the denni then the denni syncopate the ina. If something is subscript then it segue the ina. If something segue the ina then it nail the ina. All german things are magic. If something is subscript and it nail the ina then it is magic. If something is german then it is subscript. The ina syncopate the ina.", "logic": "\nGerman(ina)\nGerman(denni)\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Subscript(x))\nforall x (Segue(x, denni) and Nail(denni, ina) -> Handleless(x))\nforall x (Nail(x, denni) -> Syncopate(denni, ina))\nforall x (Subscript(x) -> Segue(x, ina))\nforall x (Segue(x, ina) -> Nail(x, ina))\nforall x (German(x) -> Magic(x))\nforall x (Subscript(x) and Nail(x, ina) -> Magic(x))\nforall x (German(x) -> Subscript(x))\n\nSyncopate(ina, ina)\n\nSyncopate(ina, ina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "Jordan is purblind. Jordan is not cherry. Jordan is not inverted. Jordan is irresolute. Jordan is synoptical. Jordan is not speckless. Hana is purblind. Hana is clamorous. Hana is irresolute. Hana is synoptical. Hana is not speckless. Alexa is clamorous. Alexa is irresolute. Alexa is synoptical. Alexa is speckless. If something is cherry then it is irresolute. If something is cherry and not clamorous then it is not irresolute. If something is clamorous then it is cherry. If something is clamorous and irresolute then it is cherry. All speckless things are purblind. If something is inverted and not speckless then it is purblind. If Jordan is inverted and Jordan is not speckless then Jordan is synoptical. If something is purblind then it is not inverted. Alexa is irresolute.", "logic": "\nPurblind(jordan)\nnot Cherry(jordan)\nnot Inverted(jordan)\nIrresolute(jordan)\nSynoptical(jordan)\nnot Speckless(jordan)\nPurblind(hana)\nClamorous(hana)\nIrresolute(hana)\nSynoptical(hana)\nnot Speckless(hana)\nClamorous(alexa)\nIrresolute(alexa)\nSynoptical(alexa)\nSpeckless(alexa)\nforall x (Cherry(x) -> Irresolute(x))\nforall x (Cherry(x) and not Clamorous(x) -> not Irresolute(x))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) and Irresolute(x) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Speckless(x) -> Purblind(x))\nforall x (Inverted(x) and not Speckless(x) -> Purblind(x))\nInverted(jordan) and not Speckless(jordan) -> Synoptical(jordan)\nforall x (Purblind(x) -> not Inverted(x))\n\nIrresolute(alexa)\n\ntherefore Irresolute(alexa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Lennie is fain. Lennie is not dismaying. Lennie is not sophomore. Lennie is bottomless. Lennie is iridaceous. Lennie is not barometric. Allyson is fain. Allyson is aloof. Allyson is bottomless. Allyson is iridaceous. Allyson is not barometric. Abigale is aloof. Abigale is bottomless. Abigale is iridaceous. Abigale is barometric. If something is dismaying then it is bottomless. If something is dismaying and not aloof then it is not bottomless. If something is aloof then it is dismaying. If something is aloof and bottomless then it is dismaying. All barometric things are fain. If something is sophomore and not barometric then it is fain. If Lennie is sophomore and Lennie is not barometric then Lennie is iridaceous. If something is fain then it is not sophomore. Abigale is not iridaceous.", "logic": "\nFain(lennie)\nnot Dismaying(lennie)\nnot Sophomore(lennie)\nBottomless(lennie)\nIridaceous(lennie)\nnot Barometric(lennie)\nFain(allyson)\nAloof(allyson)\nBottomless(allyson)\nIridaceous(allyson)\nnot Barometric(allyson)\nAloof(abigale)\nBottomless(abigale)\nIridaceous(abigale)\nBarometric(abigale)\nforall x (Dismaying(x) -> Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Dismaying(x) and not Aloof(x) -> not Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Dismaying(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) and Bottomless(x) -> Dismaying(x))\nforall x (Barometric(x) -> Fain(x))\nforall x (Sophomore(x) and not Barometric(x) -> Fain(x))\nSophomore(lennie) and not Barometric(lennie) -> Iridaceous(lennie)\nforall x (Fain(x) -> not Sophomore(x))\n\nnot Iridaceous(abigale)\n\ntherefore Iridaceous(abigale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Berna is trusty. Berna is not praetorian. Berna is not sigmoidal. Berna is rhetorical. Berna is enhanced. Berna is not mandean. Johnny is trusty. Johnny is copulatory. Johnny is rhetorical. Johnny is enhanced. Johnny is not mandean. Franny is copulatory. Franny is rhetorical. Franny is enhanced. Franny is mandean. If something is praetorian then it is rhetorical. If something is praetorian and not copulatory then it is not rhetorical. If something is copulatory then it is praetorian. If something is copulatory and rhetorical then it is praetorian. All mandean things are trusty. If something is sigmoidal and not mandean then it is trusty. If Berna is sigmoidal and Berna is not mandean then Berna is enhanced. If something is trusty then it is not sigmoidal. Franny is trusty.", "logic": "\nTrusty(berna)\nnot Praetorian(berna)\nnot Sigmoidal(berna)\nRhetorical(berna)\nEnhanced(berna)\nnot Mandean(berna)\nTrusty(johnny)\nCopulatory(johnny)\nRhetorical(johnny)\nEnhanced(johnny)\nnot Mandean(johnny)\nCopulatory(franny)\nRhetorical(franny)\nEnhanced(franny)\nMandean(franny)\nforall x (Praetorian(x) -> Rhetorical(x))\nforall x (Praetorian(x) and not Copulatory(x) -> not Rhetorical(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) -> Praetorian(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) and Rhetorical(x) -> Praetorian(x))\nforall x (Mandean(x) -> Trusty(x))\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) and not Mandean(x) -> Trusty(x))\nSigmoidal(berna) and not Mandean(berna) -> Enhanced(berna)\nforall x (Trusty(x) -> not Sigmoidal(x))\n\nTrusty(franny)\n\nMandean(franny) and forall x (Mandean(x) -> Trusty(x)) -> therefore Trusty(franny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Rodina is nonuple. Rodina is not donatist. Rodina is not nidifugous. Rodina is dignified. Rodina is renowned. Rodina is not alight. Emyle is nonuple. Emyle is buffeted. Emyle is dignified. Emyle is renowned. Emyle is not alight. Godwin is buffeted. Godwin is dignified. Godwin is renowned. Godwin is alight. If something is donatist then it is dignified. If something is donatist and not buffeted then it is not dignified. If something is buffeted then it is donatist. If something is buffeted and dignified then it is donatist. All alight things are nonuple. If something is nidifugous and not alight then it is nonuple. If Rodina is nidifugous and Rodina is not alight then Rodina is renowned. If something is nonuple then it is not nidifugous. Emyle is not donatist.", "logic": "\nNonuple(rodina)\nnot Donatist(rodina)\nnot Nidifugous(rodina)\nDignified(rodina)\nRenowned(rodina)\nnot Alight(rodina)\nNonuple(emyle)\nBuffeted(emyle)\nDignified(emyle)\nRenowned(emyle)\nnot Alight(emyle)\nBuffeted(godwin)\nDignified(godwin)\nRenowned(godwin)\nAlight(godwin)\nforall x (Donatist(x) -> Dignified(x))\nforall x (Donatist(x) and not Buffeted(x) -> not Dignified(x))\nforall x (Buffeted(x) -> Donatist(x))\nforall x (Buffeted(x) and Dignified(x) -> Donatist(x))\nforall x (Alight(x) -> Nonuple(x))\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) and not Alight(x) -> Nonuple(x))\nNidifugous(rodina) and not Alight(rodina) -> Renowned(rodina)\nforall x (Nonuple(x) -> not Nidifugous(x))\n\nnot Donatist(emyle)\n\nBuffeted(emyle) and forall x (Buffeted(x) -> Donatist(x)) -> therefore Donatist(emyle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Berri is chelated. Berri is not punishable. Berri is not unholy. Berri is glib. Berri is yankee. Berri is not fossilized. Julius is chelated. Julius is czech. Julius is glib. Julius is yankee. Julius is not fossilized. Taryn is czech. Taryn is glib. Taryn is yankee. Taryn is fossilized. If something is punishable then it is glib. If something is punishable and not czech then it is not glib. If something is czech then it is punishable. If something is czech and glib then it is punishable. All fossilized things are chelated. If something is unholy and not fossilized then it is chelated. If Berri is unholy and Berri is not fossilized then Berri is yankee. If something is chelated then it is not unholy. Taryn is not unholy.", "logic": "\nChelated(berri)\nnot Punishable(berri)\nnot Unholy(berri)\nGlib(berri)\nYankee(berri)\nnot Fossilized(berri)\nChelated(julius)\nCzech(julius)\nGlib(julius)\nYankee(julius)\nnot Fossilized(julius)\nCzech(taryn)\nGlib(taryn)\nYankee(taryn)\nFossilized(taryn)\nforall x (Punishable(x) -> Glib(x))\nforall x (Punishable(x) and not Czech(x) -> not Glib(x))\nforall x (Czech(x) -> Punishable(x))\nforall x (Czech(x) and Glib(x) -> Punishable(x))\nforall x (Fossilized(x) -> Chelated(x))\nforall x (Unholy(x) and not Fossilized(x) -> Chelated(x))\nUnholy(berri) and not Fossilized(berri) -> Yankee(berri)\nforall x (Chelated(x) -> not Unholy(x))\n\nnot Unholy(taryn)\n\nFossilized(taryn) and forall x (Fossilized(x) -> Chelated(x)) -> therefore Chelated(taryn) Chelated(taryn) and forall x (Chelated(x) -> not Unholy(x)) -> therefore not Unholy(taryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Tristan is ovine. Tristan is not stressful. Tristan is not epicene. Tristan is phlegmy. Tristan is shadowy. Tristan is not biconcave. Wildon is ovine. Wildon is familiar. Wildon is phlegmy. Wildon is shadowy. Wildon is not biconcave. Arabelle is familiar. Arabelle is phlegmy. Arabelle is shadowy. Arabelle is biconcave. If something is stressful then it is phlegmy. If something is stressful and not familiar then it is not phlegmy. If something is familiar then it is stressful. If something is familiar and phlegmy then it is stressful. All biconcave things are ovine. If something is epicene and not biconcave then it is ovine. If Tristan is epicene and Tristan is not biconcave then Tristan is shadowy. If something is ovine then it is not epicene. Arabelle is epicene.", "logic": "\nOvine(tristan)\nnot Stressful(tristan)\nnot Epicene(tristan)\nPhlegmy(tristan)\nShadowy(tristan)\nnot Biconcave(tristan)\nOvine(wildon)\nFamiliar(wildon)\nPhlegmy(wildon)\nShadowy(wildon)\nnot Biconcave(wildon)\nFamiliar(arabelle)\nPhlegmy(arabelle)\nShadowy(arabelle)\nBiconcave(arabelle)\nforall x (Stressful(x) -> Phlegmy(x))\nforall x (Stressful(x) and not Familiar(x) -> not Phlegmy(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) -> Stressful(x))\nforall x (Familiar(x) and Phlegmy(x) -> Stressful(x))\nforall x (Biconcave(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Epicene(x) and not Biconcave(x) -> Ovine(x))\nEpicene(tristan) and not Biconcave(tristan) -> Shadowy(tristan)\nforall x (Ovine(x) -> not Epicene(x))\n\nEpicene(arabelle)\n\nBiconcave(arabelle) and forall x (Biconcave(x) -> Ovine(x)) -> therefore Ovine(arabelle) Ovine(arabelle) and forall x (Ovine(x) -> not Epicene(x)) -> therefore not Epicene(arabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-5"} {"premises": "Jolynn is traveled. If Jolynn is passable then Jolynn is malposed. If Jolynn is sneaking then Jolynn is malposed. If someone is traveled and passable then they are malposed. If someone is traveled then they are passable. If someone is malposed then they are not lobular. If someone is malposed and not lobular then they are cancerous. Jolynn is traveled.", "logic": "\nTraveled(jolynn)\nPassable(jolynn) -> Malposed(jolynn)\nSneaking(jolynn) -> Malposed(jolynn)\nforall x (Traveled(x) and Passable(x) -> Malposed(x))\nforall x (Traveled(x) -> Passable(x))\nforall x (Malposed(x) -> not Lobular(x))\nforall x (Malposed(x) and not Lobular(x) -> Cancerous(x))\n\nTraveled(jolynn)\n\ntherefore Traveled(jolynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Wileen is stative. If Wileen is ungroomed then Wileen is footsore. If Wileen is eristical then Wileen is footsore. If someone is stative and ungroomed then they are footsore. If someone is stative then they are ungroomed. If someone is footsore then they are not rentable. If someone is footsore and not rentable then they are modified. Wileen is not stative.", "logic": "\nStative(wileen)\nUngroomed(wileen) -> Footsore(wileen)\nEristical(wileen) -> Footsore(wileen)\nforall x (Stative(x) and Ungroomed(x) -> Footsore(x))\nforall x (Stative(x) -> Ungroomed(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) -> not Rentable(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) and not Rentable(x) -> Modified(x))\n\nnot Stative(wileen)\n\ntherefore Stative(wileen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Lenore is sloppy. If Lenore is activist then Lenore is inquiring. If Lenore is disjunct then Lenore is inquiring. If someone is sloppy and activist then they are inquiring. If someone is sloppy then they are activist. If someone is inquiring then they are not eutrophic. If someone is inquiring and not eutrophic then they are obsequious. Lenore is activist.", "logic": "\nSloppy(lenore)\nActivist(lenore) -> Inquiring(lenore)\nDisjunct(lenore) -> Inquiring(lenore)\nforall x (Sloppy(x) and Activist(x) -> Inquiring(x))\nforall x (Sloppy(x) -> Activist(x))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) -> not Eutrophic(x))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) and not Eutrophic(x) -> Obsequious(x))\n\nActivist(lenore)\n\nSloppy(lenore) and forall x (Sloppy(x) -> Activist(x)) -> therefore Activist(lenore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Nance is abkhazian. If Nance is intact then Nance is infuriated. If Nance is nigerien then Nance is infuriated. If someone is abkhazian and intact then they are infuriated. If someone is abkhazian then they are intact. If someone is infuriated then they are not phoney. If someone is infuriated and not phoney then they are irresolute. Nance is not intact.", "logic": "\nAbkhazian(nance)\nIntact(nance) -> Infuriated(nance)\nNigerien(nance) -> Infuriated(nance)\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Intact(x) -> Infuriated(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Intact(x))\nforall x (Infuriated(x) -> not Phoney(x))\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and not Phoney(x) -> Irresolute(x))\n\nnot Intact(nance)\n\nAbkhazian(nance) and forall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Intact(x)) -> therefore Intact(nance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Karoline is honeylike. If Karoline is dogmatical then Karoline is better. If Karoline is heretical then Karoline is better. If someone is honeylike and dogmatical then they are better. If someone is honeylike then they are dogmatical. If someone is better then they are not upstream. If someone is better and not upstream then they are referenced. Karoline is better.", "logic": "\nHoneylike(karoline)\nDogmatical(karoline) -> Better(karoline)\nHeretical(karoline) -> Better(karoline)\nforall x (Honeylike(x) and Dogmatical(x) -> Better(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\nforall x (Better(x) -> not Upstream(x))\nforall x (Better(x) and not Upstream(x) -> Referenced(x))\n\nBetter(karoline)\n\nHoneylike(karoline) and forall x (Honeylike(x) -> Dogmatical(x)) -> therefore Dogmatical(karoline) Dogmatical(karoline) and Dogmatical(karoline) -> Better(karoline) -> therefore Better(karoline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Flint is muciferous. If Flint is stumpy then Flint is inexpert. If Flint is unheralded then Flint is inexpert. If someone is muciferous and stumpy then they are inexpert. If someone is muciferous then they are stumpy. If someone is inexpert then they are not anaerobic. If someone is inexpert and not anaerobic then they are flavourous. Flint is not inexpert.", "logic": "\nMuciferous(flint)\nStumpy(flint) -> Inexpert(flint)\nUnheralded(flint) -> Inexpert(flint)\nforall x (Muciferous(x) and Stumpy(x) -> Inexpert(x))\nforall x (Muciferous(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nforall x (Inexpert(x) -> not Anaerobic(x))\nforall x (Inexpert(x) and not Anaerobic(x) -> Flavourous(x))\n\nnot Inexpert(flint)\n\nMuciferous(flint) and forall x (Muciferous(x) -> Stumpy(x)) -> therefore Stumpy(flint) Stumpy(flint) and Stumpy(flint) -> Inexpert(flint) -> therefore Inexpert(flint)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Leigha is astigmatic. If Leigha is siberian then Leigha is outrigged. If Leigha is frequent then Leigha is outrigged. If someone is astigmatic and siberian then they are outrigged. If someone is astigmatic then they are siberian. If someone is outrigged then they are not marbleized. If someone is outrigged and not marbleized then they are bicorn. Leigha is not marbleized.", "logic": "\nAstigmatic(leigha)\nSiberian(leigha) -> Outrigged(leigha)\nFrequent(leigha) -> Outrigged(leigha)\nforall x (Astigmatic(x) and Siberian(x) -> Outrigged(x))\nforall x (Astigmatic(x) -> Siberian(x))\nforall x (Outrigged(x) -> not Marbleized(x))\nforall x (Outrigged(x) and not Marbleized(x) -> Bicorn(x))\n\nnot Marbleized(leigha)\n\nAstigmatic(leigha) and forall x (Astigmatic(x) -> Siberian(x)) -> therefore Siberian(leigha) Siberian(leigha) and Siberian(leigha) -> Outrigged(leigha) -> therefore Outrigged(leigha) Outrigged(leigha) and forall x (Outrigged(x) -> not Marbleized(x)) -> therefore not Marbleized(leigha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Sammy is libellous. If Sammy is briery then Sammy is flowered. If Sammy is tripartite then Sammy is flowered. If someone is libellous and briery then they are flowered. If someone is libellous then they are briery. If someone is flowered then they are not amnestic. If someone is flowered and not amnestic then they are definable. Sammy is amnestic.", "logic": "\nLibellous(sammy)\nBriery(sammy) -> Flowered(sammy)\nTripartite(sammy) -> Flowered(sammy)\nforall x (Libellous(x) and Briery(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Libellous(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) -> not Amnestic(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) and not Amnestic(x) -> Definable(x))\n\nAmnestic(sammy)\n\nLibellous(sammy) and forall x (Libellous(x) -> Briery(x)) -> therefore Briery(sammy) Briery(sammy) and Briery(sammy) -> Flowered(sammy) -> therefore Flowered(sammy) Flowered(sammy) and forall x (Flowered(x) -> not Amnestic(x)) -> therefore not Amnestic(sammy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Rufe is deistic. If Rufe is crowned then Rufe is tipsy. If Rufe is aliform then Rufe is tipsy. If someone is deistic and crowned then they are tipsy. If someone is deistic then they are crowned. If someone is tipsy then they are not impelling. If someone is tipsy and not impelling then they are springy. Rufe is not aliform.", "logic": "\nDeistic(rufe)\nCrowned(rufe) -> Tipsy(rufe)\nAliform(rufe) -> Tipsy(rufe)\nforall x (Deistic(x) and Crowned(x) -> Tipsy(x))\nforall x (Deistic(x) -> Crowned(x))\nforall x (Tipsy(x) -> not Impelling(x))\nforall x (Tipsy(x) and not Impelling(x) -> Springy(x))\n\nnot Aliform(rufe)\n\nnot Aliform(rufe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Conny is avestan. If Conny is storied then Conny is thankless. If Conny is imaginary then Conny is thankless. If someone is avestan and storied then they are thankless. If someone is avestan then they are storied. If someone is thankless then they are not heady. If someone is thankless and not heady then they are bombastic. Conny is round.", "logic": "\nAvestan(conny)\nStoried(conny) -> Thankless(conny)\nImaginary(conny) -> Thankless(conny)\nforall x (Avestan(x) and Storied(x) -> Thankless(x))\nforall x (Avestan(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Thankless(x) -> not Heady(x))\nforall x (Thankless(x) and not Heady(x) -> Bombastic(x))\n\nRound(conny)\n\nRound(conny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-855"} {"premises": "Kissie is palatine. Kissie is unaided. Kissie is aortic. Kissie is reconciled. Leese is bungled. Leese is unaided. Leese is obligated. Leese is aortic. Leese is not reconciled. Murial is unaided. Murial is not obligated. Murial is aortic. All palatine, middlemost things are reconciled. If something is bungled and middlemost then it is reconciled. If something is unaided and not obligated then it is palatine. All palatine things are middlemost. If something is palatine then it is unaided. If something is palatine and bungled then it is not unaided. If Kissie is unaided and Kissie is middlemost then Kissie is reconciled. If something is obligated and reconciled then it is bungled. Murial is not obligated.", "logic": "\nPalatine(kissie)\nUnaided(kissie)\nAortic(kissie)\nReconciled(kissie)\nBungled(leese)\nUnaided(leese)\nObligated(leese)\nAortic(leese)\nnot Reconciled(leese)\nUnaided(murial)\nnot Obligated(murial)\nAortic(murial)\nforall x (Palatine(x) and Middlemost(x) -> Reconciled(x))\nforall x (Bungled(x) and Middlemost(x) -> Reconciled(x))\nforall x (Unaided(x) and not Obligated(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) -> Unaided(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) and Bungled(x) -> not Unaided(x))\nUnaided(kissie) and Middlemost(kissie) -> Reconciled(kissie)\nforall x (Obligated(x) and Reconciled(x) -> Bungled(x))\n\nnot Obligated(murial)\n\ntherefore not Obligated(murial)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Alphonse is coriaceous. Alphonse is cagey. Alphonse is periwigged. Alphonse is greyish. Maud is threadlike. Maud is cagey. Maud is divided. Maud is periwigged. Maud is not greyish. Chicky is cagey. Chicky is not divided. Chicky is periwigged. All coriaceous, dilute things are greyish. If something is threadlike and dilute then it is greyish. If something is cagey and not divided then it is coriaceous. All coriaceous things are dilute. If something is coriaceous then it is cagey. If something is coriaceous and threadlike then it is not cagey. If Alphonse is cagey and Alphonse is dilute then Alphonse is greyish. If something is divided and greyish then it is threadlike. Alphonse is not greyish.", "logic": "\nCoriaceous(alphonse)\nCagey(alphonse)\nPeriwigged(alphonse)\nGreyish(alphonse)\nThreadlike(maud)\nCagey(maud)\nDivided(maud)\nPeriwigged(maud)\nnot Greyish(maud)\nCagey(chicky)\nnot Divided(chicky)\nPeriwigged(chicky)\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and Dilute(x) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and Dilute(x) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) and not Divided(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Dilute(x))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Cagey(x))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and Threadlike(x) -> not Cagey(x))\nCagey(alphonse) and Dilute(alphonse) -> Greyish(alphonse)\nforall x (Divided(x) and Greyish(x) -> Threadlike(x))\n\nnot Greyish(alphonse)\n\ntherefore Greyish(alphonse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Scotti is quotidian. Scotti is yemeni. Scotti is donnian. Scotti is duplicable. Hestia is bantoid. Hestia is yemeni. Hestia is thermic. Hestia is donnian. Hestia is not duplicable. Sherwin is yemeni. Sherwin is not thermic. Sherwin is donnian. All quotidian, burbling things are duplicable. If something is bantoid and burbling then it is duplicable. If something is yemeni and not thermic then it is quotidian. All quotidian things are burbling. If something is quotidian then it is yemeni. If something is quotidian and bantoid then it is not yemeni. If Scotti is yemeni and Scotti is burbling then Scotti is duplicable. If something is thermic and duplicable then it is bantoid. Sherwin is quotidian.", "logic": "\nQuotidian(scotti)\nYemeni(scotti)\nDonnian(scotti)\nDuplicable(scotti)\nBantoid(hestia)\nYemeni(hestia)\nThermic(hestia)\nDonnian(hestia)\nnot Duplicable(hestia)\nYemeni(sherwin)\nnot Thermic(sherwin)\nDonnian(sherwin)\nforall x (Quotidian(x) and Burbling(x) -> Duplicable(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) and Burbling(x) -> Duplicable(x))\nforall x (Yemeni(x) and not Thermic(x) -> Quotidian(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> Burbling(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> Yemeni(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) and Bantoid(x) -> not Yemeni(x))\nYemeni(scotti) and Burbling(scotti) -> Duplicable(scotti)\nforall x (Thermic(x) and Duplicable(x) -> Bantoid(x))\n\nQuotidian(sherwin)\n\nYemeni(sherwin) and not Thermic(sherwin) and forall x (Yemeni(x) and not Thermic(x) -> Quotidian(x)) -> therefore Quotidian(sherwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Joelynn is umbrageous. Joelynn is uncounted. Joelynn is nurturant. Joelynn is sigmoid. Kissee is occipital. Kissee is uncounted. Kissee is improper. Kissee is nurturant. Kissee is not sigmoid. Hendrika is uncounted. Hendrika is not improper. Hendrika is nurturant. All umbrageous, estrogenic things are sigmoid. If something is occipital and estrogenic then it is sigmoid. If something is uncounted and not improper then it is umbrageous. All umbrageous things are estrogenic. If something is umbrageous then it is uncounted. If something is umbrageous and occipital then it is not uncounted. If Joelynn is uncounted and Joelynn is estrogenic then Joelynn is sigmoid. If something is improper and sigmoid then it is occipital. Hendrika is not umbrageous.", "logic": "\nUmbrageous(joelynn)\nUncounted(joelynn)\nNurturant(joelynn)\nSigmoid(joelynn)\nOccipital(kissee)\nUncounted(kissee)\nImproper(kissee)\nNurturant(kissee)\nnot Sigmoid(kissee)\nUncounted(hendrika)\nnot Improper(hendrika)\nNurturant(hendrika)\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Estrogenic(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nforall x (Occipital(x) and Estrogenic(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) and not Improper(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) -> Uncounted(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Occipital(x) -> not Uncounted(x))\nUncounted(joelynn) and Estrogenic(joelynn) -> Sigmoid(joelynn)\nforall x (Improper(x) and Sigmoid(x) -> Occipital(x))\n\nnot Umbrageous(hendrika)\n\nUncounted(hendrika) and not Improper(hendrika) and forall x (Uncounted(x) and not Improper(x) -> Umbrageous(x)) -> therefore Umbrageous(hendrika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Gabriel is fissile. Gabriel is pyrogenous. Gabriel is trashy. Gabriel is uninvolved. Lolly is occupied. Lolly is pyrogenous. Lolly is wakeless. Lolly is trashy. Lolly is not uninvolved. Mallorie is pyrogenous. Mallorie is not wakeless. Mallorie is trashy. All fissile, theistical things are uninvolved. If something is occupied and theistical then it is uninvolved. If something is pyrogenous and not wakeless then it is fissile. All fissile things are theistical. If something is fissile then it is pyrogenous. If something is fissile and occupied then it is not pyrogenous. If Gabriel is pyrogenous and Gabriel is theistical then Gabriel is uninvolved. If something is wakeless and uninvolved then it is occupied. Mallorie is theistical.", "logic": "\nFissile(gabriel)\nPyrogenous(gabriel)\nTrashy(gabriel)\nUninvolved(gabriel)\nOccupied(lolly)\nPyrogenous(lolly)\nWakeless(lolly)\nTrashy(lolly)\nnot Uninvolved(lolly)\nPyrogenous(mallorie)\nnot Wakeless(mallorie)\nTrashy(mallorie)\nforall x (Fissile(x) and Theistical(x) -> Uninvolved(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) and Theistical(x) -> Uninvolved(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenous(x) and not Wakeless(x) -> Fissile(x))\nforall x (Fissile(x) -> Theistical(x))\nforall x (Fissile(x) -> Pyrogenous(x))\nforall x (Fissile(x) and Occupied(x) -> not Pyrogenous(x))\nPyrogenous(gabriel) and Theistical(gabriel) -> Uninvolved(gabriel)\nforall x (Wakeless(x) and Uninvolved(x) -> Occupied(x))\n\nTheistical(mallorie)\n\nPyrogenous(mallorie) and not Wakeless(mallorie) and forall x (Pyrogenous(x) and not Wakeless(x) -> Fissile(x)) -> therefore Fissile(mallorie) Fissile(mallorie) and forall x (Fissile(x) -> Theistical(x)) -> therefore Theistical(mallorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Lauretta is phenomenal. Lauretta is handheld. Lauretta is horizontal. Lauretta is labeled. Lay is broadloom. Lay is handheld. Lay is branchless. Lay is horizontal. Lay is not labeled. Katina is handheld. Katina is not branchless. Katina is horizontal. All phenomenal, unleaded things are labeled. If something is broadloom and unleaded then it is labeled. If something is handheld and not branchless then it is phenomenal. All phenomenal things are unleaded. If something is phenomenal then it is handheld. If something is phenomenal and broadloom then it is not handheld. If Lauretta is handheld and Lauretta is unleaded then Lauretta is labeled. If something is branchless and labeled then it is broadloom. Katina is not unleaded.", "logic": "\nPhenomenal(lauretta)\nHandheld(lauretta)\nHorizontal(lauretta)\nLabeled(lauretta)\nBroadloom(lay)\nHandheld(lay)\nBranchless(lay)\nHorizontal(lay)\nnot Labeled(lay)\nHandheld(katina)\nnot Branchless(katina)\nHorizontal(katina)\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) and Unleaded(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Broadloom(x) and Unleaded(x) -> Labeled(x))\nforall x (Handheld(x) and not Branchless(x) -> Phenomenal(x))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Unleaded(x))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Handheld(x))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) and Broadloom(x) -> not Handheld(x))\nHandheld(lauretta) and Unleaded(lauretta) -> Labeled(lauretta)\nforall x (Branchless(x) and Labeled(x) -> Broadloom(x))\n\nnot Unleaded(katina)\n\nHandheld(katina) and not Branchless(katina) and forall x (Handheld(x) and not Branchless(x) -> Phenomenal(x)) -> therefore Phenomenal(katina) Phenomenal(katina) and forall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Unleaded(x)) -> therefore Unleaded(katina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Nerta is coveted. Nerta is anesthetic. Nerta is squab. Nerta is random. Lorena is stiff. Lorena is anesthetic. Lorena is afflicted. Lorena is squab. Lorena is not random. Thayne is anesthetic. Thayne is not afflicted. Thayne is squab. All coveted, transitory things are random. If something is stiff and transitory then it is random. If something is anesthetic and not afflicted then it is coveted. All coveted things are transitory. If something is coveted then it is anesthetic. If something is coveted and stiff then it is not anesthetic. If Nerta is anesthetic and Nerta is transitory then Nerta is random. If something is afflicted and random then it is stiff. Thayne is random.", "logic": "\nCoveted(nerta)\nAnesthetic(nerta)\nSquab(nerta)\nRandom(nerta)\nStiff(lorena)\nAnesthetic(lorena)\nAfflicted(lorena)\nSquab(lorena)\nnot Random(lorena)\nAnesthetic(thayne)\nnot Afflicted(thayne)\nSquab(thayne)\nforall x (Coveted(x) and Transitory(x) -> Random(x))\nforall x (Stiff(x) and Transitory(x) -> Random(x))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) and not Afflicted(x) -> Coveted(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) and Stiff(x) -> not Anesthetic(x))\nAnesthetic(nerta) and Transitory(nerta) -> Random(nerta)\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and Random(x) -> Stiff(x))\n\nRandom(thayne)\n\nAnesthetic(thayne) and not Afflicted(thayne) and forall x (Anesthetic(x) and not Afflicted(x) -> Coveted(x)) -> therefore Coveted(thayne) Anesthetic(thayne) and not Afflicted(thayne) and forall x (Anesthetic(x) and not Afflicted(x) -> Coveted(x)) -> therefore Coveted(thayne) Coveted(thayne) and forall x (Coveted(x) -> Transitory(x)) -> therefore Transitory(thayne) Coveted(thayne) and Transitory(thayne) and forall x (Coveted(x) and Transitory(x) -> Random(x)) -> therefore Random(thayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Plato is unwearied. Plato is federate. Plato is uncombined. Plato is micropylar. Giorgia is grievous. Giorgia is federate. Giorgia is fizzing. Giorgia is uncombined. Giorgia is not micropylar. Kathleen is federate. Kathleen is not fizzing. Kathleen is uncombined. All unwearied, surly things are micropylar. If something is grievous and surly then it is micropylar. If something is federate and not fizzing then it is unwearied. All unwearied things are surly. If something is unwearied then it is federate. If something is unwearied and grievous then it is not federate. If Plato is federate and Plato is surly then Plato is micropylar. If something is fizzing and micropylar then it is grievous. Kathleen is not micropylar.", "logic": "\nUnwearied(plato)\nFederate(plato)\nUncombined(plato)\nMicropylar(plato)\nGrievous(giorgia)\nFederate(giorgia)\nFizzing(giorgia)\nUncombined(giorgia)\nnot Micropylar(giorgia)\nFederate(kathleen)\nnot Fizzing(kathleen)\nUncombined(kathleen)\nforall x (Unwearied(x) and Surly(x) -> Micropylar(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Surly(x) -> Micropylar(x))\nforall x (Federate(x) and not Fizzing(x) -> Unwearied(x))\nforall x (Unwearied(x) -> Surly(x))\nforall x (Unwearied(x) -> Federate(x))\nforall x (Unwearied(x) and Grievous(x) -> not Federate(x))\nFederate(plato) and Surly(plato) -> Micropylar(plato)\nforall x (Fizzing(x) and Micropylar(x) -> Grievous(x))\n\nnot Micropylar(kathleen)\n\nFederate(kathleen) and not Fizzing(kathleen) and forall x (Federate(x) and not Fizzing(x) -> Unwearied(x)) -> therefore Unwearied(kathleen) Federate(kathleen) and not Fizzing(kathleen) and forall x (Federate(x) and not Fizzing(x) -> Unwearied(x)) -> therefore Unwearied(kathleen) Unwearied(kathleen) and forall x (Unwearied(x) -> Surly(x)) -> therefore Surly(kathleen) Unwearied(kathleen) and Surly(kathleen) and forall x (Unwearied(x) and Surly(x) -> Micropylar(x)) -> therefore Micropylar(kathleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Elna is gleaming. Elna is hanoverian. Elna is unemphatic. Elna is cuddly. Gill is bluff. Gill is hanoverian. Gill is jordanian. Gill is unemphatic. Gill is not cuddly. Vicky is hanoverian. Vicky is not jordanian. Vicky is unemphatic. All gleaming, personal things are cuddly. If something is bluff and personal then it is cuddly. If something is hanoverian and not jordanian then it is gleaming. All gleaming things are personal. If something is gleaming then it is hanoverian. If something is gleaming and bluff then it is not hanoverian. If Elna is hanoverian and Elna is personal then Elna is cuddly. If something is jordanian and cuddly then it is bluff. Gill is not personal.", "logic": "\nGleaming(elna)\nHanoverian(elna)\nUnemphatic(elna)\nCuddly(elna)\nBluff(gill)\nHanoverian(gill)\nJordanian(gill)\nUnemphatic(gill)\nnot Cuddly(gill)\nHanoverian(vicky)\nnot Jordanian(vicky)\nUnemphatic(vicky)\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Personal(x) -> Cuddly(x))\nforall x (Bluff(x) and Personal(x) -> Cuddly(x))\nforall x (Hanoverian(x) and not Jordanian(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Personal(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Hanoverian(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Bluff(x) -> not Hanoverian(x))\nHanoverian(elna) and Personal(elna) -> Cuddly(elna)\nforall x (Jordanian(x) and Cuddly(x) -> Bluff(x))\n\nnot Personal(gill)\n\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Personal(x)) <- forall x (Hanoverian(x) and not Jordanian(x) -> Gleaming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Jenica is cereal. Jenica is bewildered. Jenica is attached. Jenica is unrevealed. Chelsy is porose. Chelsy is bewildered. Chelsy is implike. Chelsy is attached. Chelsy is not unrevealed. Gershom is bewildered. Gershom is not implike. Gershom is attached. All cereal, anicteric things are unrevealed. If something is porose and anicteric then it is unrevealed. If something is bewildered and not implike then it is cereal. All cereal things are anicteric. If something is cereal then it is bewildered. If something is cereal and porose then it is not bewildered. If Jenica is bewildered and Jenica is anicteric then Jenica is unrevealed. If something is implike and unrevealed then it is porose. Gershom is porose.", "logic": "\nCereal(jenica)\nBewildered(jenica)\nAttached(jenica)\nUnrevealed(jenica)\nPorose(chelsy)\nBewildered(chelsy)\nImplike(chelsy)\nAttached(chelsy)\nnot Unrevealed(chelsy)\nBewildered(gershom)\nnot Implike(gershom)\nAttached(gershom)\nforall x (Cereal(x) and Anicteric(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Porose(x) and Anicteric(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Bewildered(x) and not Implike(x) -> Cereal(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) -> Anicteric(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) -> Bewildered(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) and Porose(x) -> not Bewildered(x))\nBewildered(jenica) and Anicteric(jenica) -> Unrevealed(jenica)\nforall x (Implike(x) and Unrevealed(x) -> Porose(x))\n\nPorose(gershom)\n\nforall x (Implike(x) and Unrevealed(x) -> Porose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Lisbeth is unassured. Lisbeth is bisulcate. Lisbeth is cogged. Lisbeth is overnice. Annabelle is bloodshot. Annabelle is bisulcate. Annabelle is capable. Annabelle is cogged. Annabelle is not overnice. Brita is bisulcate. Brita is not capable. Brita is cogged. All unassured, eellike things are overnice. If something is bloodshot and eellike then it is overnice. If something is bisulcate and not capable then it is unassured. All unassured things are eellike. If something is unassured then it is bisulcate. If something is unassured and bloodshot then it is not bisulcate. If Lisbeth is bisulcate and Lisbeth is eellike then Lisbeth is overnice. If something is capable and overnice then it is bloodshot. Annabelle is not unassured.", "logic": "\nUnassured(lisbeth)\nBisulcate(lisbeth)\nCogged(lisbeth)\nOvernice(lisbeth)\nBloodshot(annabelle)\nBisulcate(annabelle)\nCapable(annabelle)\nCogged(annabelle)\nnot Overnice(annabelle)\nBisulcate(brita)\nnot Capable(brita)\nCogged(brita)\nforall x (Unassured(x) and Eellike(x) -> Overnice(x))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) and Eellike(x) -> Overnice(x))\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) and not Capable(x) -> Unassured(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Bisulcate(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) and Bloodshot(x) -> not Bisulcate(x))\nBisulcate(lisbeth) and Eellike(lisbeth) -> Overnice(lisbeth)\nforall x (Capable(x) and Overnice(x) -> Bloodshot(x))\n\nnot Unassured(annabelle)\n\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) and not Capable(x) -> Unassured(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Ninon is greenside. Ninon is ninefold. Ninon is wilsonian. Ninon is allusive. Lorrie is better. Lorrie is ninefold. Lorrie is mythic. Lorrie is wilsonian. Lorrie is not allusive. Berthe is ninefold. Berthe is not mythic. Berthe is wilsonian. All greenside, tilted things are allusive. If something is better and tilted then it is allusive. If something is ninefold and not mythic then it is greenside. All greenside things are tilted. If something is greenside then it is ninefold. If something is greenside and better then it is not ninefold. If Ninon is ninefold and Ninon is tilted then Ninon is allusive. If something is mythic and allusive then it is better. Ninon is better.", "logic": "\nGreenside(ninon)\nNinefold(ninon)\nWilsonian(ninon)\nAllusive(ninon)\nBetter(lorrie)\nNinefold(lorrie)\nMythic(lorrie)\nWilsonian(lorrie)\nnot Allusive(lorrie)\nNinefold(berthe)\nnot Mythic(berthe)\nWilsonian(berthe)\nforall x (Greenside(x) and Tilted(x) -> Allusive(x))\nforall x (Better(x) and Tilted(x) -> Allusive(x))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and not Mythic(x) -> Greenside(x))\nforall x (Greenside(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Greenside(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Greenside(x) and Better(x) -> not Ninefold(x))\nNinefold(ninon) and Tilted(ninon) -> Allusive(ninon)\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Allusive(x) -> Better(x))\n\nBetter(ninon)\n\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Allusive(x) -> Better(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1042"} {"premises": "Wilhelm is mediated. Lelah is capitalist. Demetris is stable. If Wilhelm is mediated then Wilhelm is vapourous. If Demetris is vapourous and Demetris is stable then Demetris is mediated. If someone is vapourous then they are stable. Young people are austral. If Lelah is timely then Lelah is capitalist. If Lelah is austral and Lelah is filthy then Lelah is vapourous. Wilhelm is mediated.", "logic": "\nMediated(wilhelm)\nCapitalist(lelah)\nStable(demetris)\nMediated(wilhelm) -> Vapourous(wilhelm)\nVapourous(demetris) and Stable(demetris) -> Mediated(demetris)\nforall x (Vapourous(x) -> Stable(x))\nforall x (Stable(x) -> Austral(x))\nTimely(lelah) -> Capitalist(lelah)\nAustral(lelah) and Filthy(lelah) -> Vapourous(lelah)\n\nMediated(wilhelm)\n\ntherefore Mediated(wilhelm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Anjanette is boytrose. Nadeen is extradural. Sherwynd is anechoic. If Anjanette is boytrose then Anjanette is fatherlike. If Sherwynd is fatherlike and Sherwynd is anechoic then Sherwynd is boytrose. If someone is fatherlike then they are anechoic. Young people are underwater. If Nadeen is corked then Nadeen is extradural. If Nadeen is underwater and Nadeen is odorous then Nadeen is fatherlike. Sherwynd is not anechoic.", "logic": "\nBoytrose(anjanette)\nExtradural(nadeen)\nAnechoic(sherwynd)\nBoytrose(anjanette) -> Fatherlike(anjanette)\nFatherlike(sherwynd) and Anechoic(sherwynd) -> Boytrose(sherwynd)\nforall x (Fatherlike(x) -> Anechoic(x))\nforall x (Anechoic(x) -> Underwater(x))\nCorked(nadeen) -> Extradural(nadeen)\nUnderwater(nadeen) and Odorous(nadeen) -> Fatherlike(nadeen)\n\nnot Anechoic(sherwynd)\n\ntherefore Anechoic(sherwynd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Mahmud is spayed. Eydie is deictic. Sibella is burdensome. If Mahmud is spayed then Mahmud is renewable. If Sibella is renewable and Sibella is burdensome then Sibella is spayed. If someone is renewable then they are burdensome. Young people are unawed. If Eydie is zairese then Eydie is deictic. If Eydie is unawed and Eydie is caucasic then Eydie is renewable. Sibella is unawed.", "logic": "\nSpayed(mahmud)\nDeictic(eydie)\nBurdensome(sibella)\nSpayed(mahmud) -> Renewable(mahmud)\nRenewable(sibella) and Burdensome(sibella) -> Spayed(sibella)\nforall x (Renewable(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Burdensome(x) -> Unawed(x))\nZairese(eydie) -> Deictic(eydie)\nUnawed(eydie) and Caucasic(eydie) -> Renewable(eydie)\n\nUnawed(sibella)\n\nBurdensome(sibella) and forall x (Burdensome(x) -> Unawed(x)) -> therefore Unawed(sibella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Chrystel is onside. Aldrich is apoplectic. Madelon is calibrated. If Chrystel is onside then Chrystel is modish. If Madelon is modish and Madelon is calibrated then Madelon is onside. If someone is modish then they are calibrated. Young people are pejorative. If Aldrich is fumed then Aldrich is apoplectic. If Aldrich is pejorative and Aldrich is lumbar then Aldrich is modish. Chrystel is not modish.", "logic": "\nOnside(chrystel)\nApoplectic(aldrich)\nCalibrated(madelon)\nOnside(chrystel) -> Modish(chrystel)\nModish(madelon) and Calibrated(madelon) -> Onside(madelon)\nforall x (Modish(x) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Calibrated(x) -> Pejorative(x))\nFumed(aldrich) -> Apoplectic(aldrich)\nPejorative(aldrich) and Lumbar(aldrich) -> Modish(aldrich)\n\nnot Modish(chrystel)\n\nOnside(chrystel) and Onside(chrystel) -> Modish(chrystel) -> therefore Modish(chrystel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Osgood is techy. Harmonia is startling. Nicholle is stupefied. If Osgood is techy then Osgood is iatrogenic. If Nicholle is iatrogenic and Nicholle is stupefied then Nicholle is techy. If someone is iatrogenic then they are stupefied. Young people are parvenue. If Harmonia is onomastic then Harmonia is startling. If Harmonia is parvenue and Harmonia is quack then Harmonia is iatrogenic. Osgood is stupefied.", "logic": "\nTechy(osgood)\nStartling(harmonia)\nStupefied(nicholle)\nTechy(osgood) -> Iatrogenic(osgood)\nIatrogenic(nicholle) and Stupefied(nicholle) -> Techy(nicholle)\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Parvenue(x))\nOnomastic(harmonia) -> Startling(harmonia)\nParvenue(harmonia) and Quack(harmonia) -> Iatrogenic(harmonia)\n\nStupefied(osgood)\n\nTechy(osgood) and Techy(osgood) -> Iatrogenic(osgood) -> therefore Iatrogenic(osgood) Iatrogenic(osgood) and forall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Stupefied(x)) -> therefore Stupefied(osgood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Wyatan is precordial. Johnette is infallible. Barron is sniffly. If Wyatan is precordial then Wyatan is corrective. If Barron is corrective and Barron is sniffly then Barron is precordial. If someone is corrective then they are sniffly. Young people are structural. If Johnette is crucial then Johnette is infallible. If Johnette is structural and Johnette is saved then Johnette is corrective. Wyatan is not sniffly.", "logic": "\nPrecordial(wyatan)\nInfallible(johnette)\nSniffly(barron)\nPrecordial(wyatan) -> Corrective(wyatan)\nCorrective(barron) and Sniffly(barron) -> Precordial(barron)\nforall x (Corrective(x) -> Sniffly(x))\nforall x (Sniffly(x) -> Structural(x))\nCrucial(johnette) -> Infallible(johnette)\nStructural(johnette) and Saved(johnette) -> Corrective(johnette)\n\nnot Sniffly(wyatan)\n\nPrecordial(wyatan) and Precordial(wyatan) -> Corrective(wyatan) -> therefore Corrective(wyatan) Corrective(wyatan) and forall x (Corrective(x) -> Sniffly(x)) -> therefore Sniffly(wyatan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Dorelia is bumbling. Almire is projectile. Pauletta is ebullient. If Dorelia is bumbling then Dorelia is short. If Pauletta is short and Pauletta is ebullient then Pauletta is bumbling. If someone is short then they are ebullient. Young people are magyar. If Almire is stormbound then Almire is projectile. If Almire is magyar and Almire is projected then Almire is short. Dorelia is magyar.", "logic": "\nBumbling(dorelia)\nProjectile(almire)\nEbullient(pauletta)\nBumbling(dorelia) -> Short(dorelia)\nShort(pauletta) and Ebullient(pauletta) -> Bumbling(pauletta)\nforall x (Short(x) -> Ebullient(x))\nforall x (Ebullient(x) -> Magyar(x))\nStormbound(almire) -> Projectile(almire)\nMagyar(almire) and Projected(almire) -> Short(almire)\n\nMagyar(dorelia)\n\nBumbling(dorelia) and Bumbling(dorelia) -> Short(dorelia) -> therefore Short(dorelia) Short(dorelia) and forall x (Short(x) -> Ebullient(x)) -> therefore Ebullient(dorelia) Ebullient(dorelia) and forall x (Ebullient(x) -> Magyar(x)) -> therefore Magyar(dorelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Selma is unoriginal. Brady is heavenly. Towney is sacrosanct. If Selma is unoriginal then Selma is dishonored. If Towney is dishonored and Towney is sacrosanct then Towney is unoriginal. If someone is dishonored then they are sacrosanct. Young people are colombian. If Brady is hasidic then Brady is heavenly. If Brady is colombian and Brady is albinistic then Brady is dishonored. Selma is not colombian.", "logic": "\nUnoriginal(selma)\nHeavenly(brady)\nSacrosanct(towney)\nUnoriginal(selma) -> Dishonored(selma)\nDishonored(towney) and Sacrosanct(towney) -> Unoriginal(towney)\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Sacrosanct(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Colombian(x))\nHasidic(brady) -> Heavenly(brady)\nColombian(brady) and Albinistic(brady) -> Dishonored(brady)\n\nnot Colombian(selma)\n\nUnoriginal(selma) and Unoriginal(selma) -> Dishonored(selma) -> therefore Dishonored(selma) Dishonored(selma) and forall x (Dishonored(x) -> Sacrosanct(x)) -> therefore Sacrosanct(selma) Sacrosanct(selma) and forall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Colombian(x)) -> therefore Colombian(selma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Edna is cagey. Clinten is converted. Shayna is alvine. If Edna is cagey then Edna is provincial. If Shayna is provincial and Shayna is alvine then Shayna is cagey. If someone is provincial then they are alvine. Young people are clinical. If Clinten is separative then Clinten is converted. If Clinten is clinical and Clinten is first then Clinten is provincial. Shayna is not cagey.", "logic": "\nCagey(edna)\nConverted(clinten)\nAlvine(shayna)\nCagey(edna) -> Provincial(edna)\nProvincial(shayna) and Alvine(shayna) -> Cagey(shayna)\nforall x (Provincial(x) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Clinical(x))\nSeparative(clinten) -> Converted(clinten)\nClinical(clinten) and First(clinten) -> Provincial(clinten)\n\nnot Cagey(shayna)\n\nProvincial(shayna) and Alvine(shayna) -> Cagey(shayna) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Melina is latent. Diannne is bold. Stormi is relative. If Melina is latent then Melina is milklike. If Stormi is milklike and Stormi is relative then Stormi is latent. If someone is milklike then they are relative. Young people are shattering. If Diannne is hulking then Diannne is bold. If Diannne is shattering and Diannne is sonic then Diannne is milklike. Diannne is relative.", "logic": "\nLatent(melina)\nBold(diannne)\nRelative(stormi)\nLatent(melina) -> Milklike(melina)\nMilklike(stormi) and Relative(stormi) -> Latent(stormi)\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Relative(x))\nforall x (Relative(x) -> Shattering(x))\nHulking(diannne) -> Bold(diannne)\nShattering(diannne) and Sonic(diannne) -> Milklike(diannne)\n\nRelative(diannne)\n\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Relative(x)) <- Shattering(diannne) and Sonic(diannne) -> Milklike(diannne) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Kristine is penetrable. Myrle is panamanian. Fazeel is adventive. If Kristine is penetrable then Kristine is pictorial. If Fazeel is pictorial and Fazeel is adventive then Fazeel is penetrable. If someone is pictorial then they are adventive. Young people are baking. If Myrle is acetylic then Myrle is panamanian. If Myrle is baking and Myrle is irruptive then Myrle is pictorial. Myrle is not pictorial.", "logic": "\nPenetrable(kristine)\nPanamanian(myrle)\nAdventive(fazeel)\nPenetrable(kristine) -> Pictorial(kristine)\nPictorial(fazeel) and Adventive(fazeel) -> Penetrable(fazeel)\nforall x (Pictorial(x) -> Adventive(x))\nforall x (Adventive(x) -> Baking(x))\nAcetylic(myrle) -> Panamanian(myrle)\nBaking(myrle) and Irruptive(myrle) -> Pictorial(myrle)\n\nnot Pictorial(myrle)\n\nBaking(myrle) and Irruptive(myrle) -> Pictorial(myrle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Andrej is celibate. Ruthie is spiritless. Ramon is lxxxvi. If Andrej is celibate then Andrej is autologous. If Ramon is autologous and Ramon is lxxxvi then Ramon is celibate. If someone is autologous then they are lxxxvi. Young people are unerect. If Ruthie is alchemical then Ruthie is spiritless. If Ruthie is unerect and Ruthie is uncoupled then Ruthie is autologous. Ruthie is unerect.", "logic": "\nCelibate(andrej)\nSpiritless(ruthie)\nLxxxvi(ramon)\nCelibate(andrej) -> Autologous(andrej)\nAutologous(ramon) and Lxxxvi(ramon) -> Celibate(ramon)\nforall x (Autologous(x) -> Lxxxvi(x))\nforall x (Lxxxvi(x) -> Unerect(x))\nAlchemical(ruthie) -> Spiritless(ruthie)\nUnerect(ruthie) and Uncoupled(ruthie) -> Autologous(ruthie)\n\nUnerect(ruthie)\n\nforall x (Lxxxvi(x) -> Unerect(x)) <- forall x (Autologous(x) -> Lxxxvi(x)) <- Unerect(ruthie) and Uncoupled(ruthie) -> Autologous(ruthie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Clareta is gnarled. Letisha is clannish. Algernon is serpentine. If Clareta is gnarled then Clareta is fetid. If Algernon is fetid and Algernon is serpentine then Algernon is gnarled. If someone is fetid then they are serpentine. Young people are remediable. If Letisha is eupnoeic then Letisha is clannish. If Letisha is remediable and Letisha is sandalled then Letisha is fetid. Algernon is not fetid.", "logic": "\nGnarled(clareta)\nClannish(letisha)\nSerpentine(algernon)\nGnarled(clareta) -> Fetid(clareta)\nFetid(algernon) and Serpentine(algernon) -> Gnarled(algernon)\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Remediable(x))\nEupnoeic(letisha) -> Clannish(letisha)\nRemediable(letisha) and Sandalled(letisha) -> Fetid(letisha)\n\nnot Fetid(algernon)\n\nnot Fetid(algernon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Wandie is darned. Valida is soled. Zelig is appointive. If Wandie is darned then Wandie is faddish. If Zelig is faddish and Zelig is appointive then Zelig is darned. If someone is faddish then they are appointive. Young people are unwatchful. If Valida is unrivaled then Valida is soled. If Valida is unwatchful and Valida is fortuitous then Valida is faddish. Valida is darned.", "logic": "\nDarned(wandie)\nSoled(valida)\nAppointive(zelig)\nDarned(wandie) -> Faddish(wandie)\nFaddish(zelig) and Appointive(zelig) -> Darned(zelig)\nforall x (Faddish(x) -> Appointive(x))\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\nUnrivaled(valida) -> Soled(valida)\nUnwatchful(valida) and Fortuitous(valida) -> Faddish(valida)\n\nDarned(valida)\n\nDarned(valida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Janine is adulterine. Timothy is best. Malkah is watery. If Janine is adulterine then Janine is unchanging. If Malkah is unchanging and Malkah is watery then Malkah is adulterine. If someone is unchanging then they are watery. Young people are blockish. If Timothy is annual then Timothy is best. If Timothy is blockish and Timothy is adherent then Timothy is unchanging. Malkah is not best.", "logic": "\nAdulterine(janine)\nBest(timothy)\nWatery(malkah)\nAdulterine(janine) -> Unchanging(janine)\nUnchanging(malkah) and Watery(malkah) -> Adulterine(malkah)\nforall x (Unchanging(x) -> Watery(x))\nforall x (Watery(x) -> Blockish(x))\nAnnual(timothy) -> Best(timothy)\nBlockish(timothy) and Adherent(timothy) -> Unchanging(timothy)\n\nnot Best(malkah)\n\nnot Best(malkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "Claudia is fetching. Desaree is jocund. Aryn is offending. If Claudia is fetching then Claudia is embryotic. If Aryn is embryotic and Aryn is offending then Aryn is fetching. If someone is embryotic then they are offending. Young people are chichi. If Desaree is industrial then Desaree is jocund. If Desaree is chichi and Desaree is cachectic then Desaree is embryotic. Desaree is industrial.", "logic": "\nFetching(claudia)\nJocund(desaree)\nOffending(aryn)\nFetching(claudia) -> Embryotic(claudia)\nEmbryotic(aryn) and Offending(aryn) -> Fetching(aryn)\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) -> Chichi(x))\nIndustrial(desaree) -> Jocund(desaree)\nChichi(desaree) and Cachectic(desaree) -> Embryotic(desaree)\n\nIndustrial(desaree)\n\nIndustrial(desaree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-490"} {"premises": "The madelle is unframed. All prepaid, intriguing people are pulmonary. If the madelle is unframed then the madelle is pulmonary. The madelle is unframed.", "logic": "\nUnframed(madelle)\nforall x (Prepaid(x) and Intriguing(x) -> Pulmonary(x))\nUnframed(madelle) -> Pulmonary(madelle)\n\nUnframed(madelle)\n\ntherefore Unframed(madelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "The nelli is singsong. All inhabited, xlviii people are cervine. If the nelli is singsong then the nelli is cervine. The nelli is not singsong.", "logic": "\nSingsong(nelli)\nforall x (Inhabited(x) and Xlviii(x) -> Cervine(x))\nSingsong(nelli) -> Cervine(nelli)\n\nnot Singsong(nelli)\n\ntherefore Singsong(nelli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "The tobye is scrabbly. All crocketed, guatemalan people are spurned. If the tobye is scrabbly then the tobye is spurned. The tobye is spurned.", "logic": "\nScrabbly(tobye)\nforall x (Crocketed(x) and Guatemalan(x) -> Spurned(x))\nScrabbly(tobye) -> Spurned(tobye)\n\nSpurned(tobye)\n\nScrabbly(tobye) and Scrabbly(tobye) -> Spurned(tobye) -> therefore Spurned(tobye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "The bev is alluvial. All unoriented, masterly people are misrelated. If the bev is alluvial then the bev is misrelated. The bev is not misrelated.", "logic": "\nAlluvial(bev)\nforall x (Unoriented(x) and Masterly(x) -> Misrelated(x))\nAlluvial(bev) -> Misrelated(bev)\n\nnot Misrelated(bev)\n\nAlluvial(bev) and Alluvial(bev) -> Misrelated(bev) -> therefore Misrelated(bev)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "The rheta is american. All minty, inexpert people are nontaxable. If the rheta is american then the rheta is nontaxable. The rheta does not see the rheta.", "logic": "\nAmerican(rheta)\nforall x (Minty(x) and Inexpert(x) -> Nontaxable(x))\nAmerican(rheta) -> Nontaxable(rheta)\n\nnot Sees(rheta, rheta)\n\nnot Sees(rheta, rheta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "The quintin is lxxi. All discreet, irksome people are thunderous. If the quintin is lxxi then the quintin is thunderous. The quintin visits the quintin.", "logic": "\nLxxi(quintin)\nforall x (Discreet(x) and Irksome(x) -> Thunderous(x))\nLxxi(quintin) -> Thunderous(quintin)\n\nVisits(quintin, quintin)\n\nVisits(quintin, quintin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "The jefferey is capitular. All unpriestly, unfaithful people are hypnotised. If the jefferey is capitular then the jefferey is hypnotised. The jefferey is not unpriestly.", "logic": "\nCapitular(jefferey)\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and Unfaithful(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\nCapitular(jefferey) -> Hypnotised(jefferey)\n\nnot Unpriestly(jefferey)\n\nnot Unpriestly(jefferey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "The bernadina is branded. All diagonal, very people are ersatz. If the bernadina is branded then the bernadina is ersatz. The bernadina chases the bernadina.", "logic": "\nBranded(bernadina)\nforall x (Diagonal(x) and Very(x) -> Ersatz(x))\nBranded(bernadina) -> Ersatz(bernadina)\n\nChases(bernadina, bernadina)\n\nChases(bernadina, bernadina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2177"} {"premises": "Gredel is not urbane. Gredel is croaky. Gredel is not martial. Gredel is nourishing. Averill is urbane. Averill is croaky. Averill is not raucous. If something is urbane and not myotic then it is not martial. If something is urbane and not raucous then it is martial. If something is urbane and not myotic then it is nourishing. If something is martial then it is nourishing. If something is raucous and not myotic then it is supine. If something is nourishing and not raucous then it is supine. Averill is not raucous.", "logic": "\nnot Urbane(gredel)\nCroaky(gredel)\nnot Martial(gredel)\nNourishing(gredel)\nUrbane(averill)\nCroaky(averill)\nnot Raucous(averill)\nforall x (Urbane(x) and not Myotic(x) -> not Martial(x))\nforall x (Urbane(x) and not Raucous(x) -> Martial(x))\nforall x (Urbane(x) and not Myotic(x) -> Nourishing(x))\nforall x (Martial(x) -> Nourishing(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) and not Myotic(x) -> Supine(x))\nforall x (Nourishing(x) and not Raucous(x) -> Supine(x))\n\nnot Raucous(averill)\n\ntherefore not Raucous(averill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Kendre is not ungusseted. Kendre is dandified. Kendre is not extendable. Kendre is succulent. Sybil is ungusseted. Sybil is dandified. Sybil is not supplicant. If something is ungusseted and not wizen then it is not extendable. If something is ungusseted and not supplicant then it is extendable. If something is ungusseted and not wizen then it is succulent. If something is extendable then it is succulent. If something is supplicant and not wizen then it is uneager. If something is succulent and not supplicant then it is uneager. Kendre is ungusseted.", "logic": "\nnot Ungusseted(kendre)\nDandified(kendre)\nnot Extendable(kendre)\nSucculent(kendre)\nUngusseted(sybil)\nDandified(sybil)\nnot Supplicant(sybil)\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and not Wizen(x) -> not Extendable(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and not Supplicant(x) -> Extendable(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and not Wizen(x) -> Succulent(x))\nforall x (Extendable(x) -> Succulent(x))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) and not Wizen(x) -> Uneager(x))\nforall x (Succulent(x) and not Supplicant(x) -> Uneager(x))\n\nUngusseted(kendre)\n\ntherefore not Ungusseted(kendre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Kali is not purposeful. Kali is conformist. Kali is not peccant. Kali is urbane. Madelina is purposeful. Madelina is conformist. Madelina is not giddy. If something is purposeful and not coiled then it is not peccant. If something is purposeful and not giddy then it is peccant. If something is purposeful and not coiled then it is urbane. If something is peccant then it is urbane. If something is giddy and not coiled then it is incurved. If something is urbane and not giddy then it is incurved. Madelina is peccant.", "logic": "\nnot Purposeful(kali)\nConformist(kali)\nnot Peccant(kali)\nUrbane(kali)\nPurposeful(madelina)\nConformist(madelina)\nnot Giddy(madelina)\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and not Coiled(x) -> not Peccant(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and not Giddy(x) -> Peccant(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and not Coiled(x) -> Urbane(x))\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Urbane(x))\nforall x (Giddy(x) and not Coiled(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Urbane(x) and not Giddy(x) -> Incurved(x))\n\nPeccant(madelina)\n\nPurposeful(madelina) and not Giddy(madelina) and forall x (Purposeful(x) and not Giddy(x) -> Peccant(x)) -> therefore Peccant(madelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Rustie is not stubby. Rustie is slighting. Rustie is not trussed. Rustie is arenaceous. Edith is stubby. Edith is slighting. Edith is not idealistic. If something is stubby and not maoist then it is not trussed. If something is stubby and not idealistic then it is trussed. If something is stubby and not maoist then it is arenaceous. If something is trussed then it is arenaceous. If something is idealistic and not maoist then it is sluttish. If something is arenaceous and not idealistic then it is sluttish. Edith is not trussed.", "logic": "\nnot Stubby(rustie)\nSlighting(rustie)\nnot Trussed(rustie)\nArenaceous(rustie)\nStubby(edith)\nSlighting(edith)\nnot Idealistic(edith)\nforall x (Stubby(x) and not Maoist(x) -> not Trussed(x))\nforall x (Stubby(x) and not Idealistic(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Stubby(x) and not Maoist(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\nforall x (Idealistic(x) and not Maoist(x) -> Sluttish(x))\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) and not Idealistic(x) -> Sluttish(x))\n\nnot Trussed(edith)\n\nStubby(edith) and not Idealistic(edith) and forall x (Stubby(x) and not Idealistic(x) -> Trussed(x)) -> therefore Trussed(edith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Elise is not glace. Elise is homiletic. Elise is not periodic. Elise is squint. Tamiko is glace. Tamiko is homiletic. Tamiko is not oafish. If something is glace and not rancorous then it is not periodic. If something is glace and not oafish then it is periodic. If something is glace and not rancorous then it is squint. If something is periodic then it is squint. If something is oafish and not rancorous then it is certified. If something is squint and not oafish then it is certified. Tamiko is squint.", "logic": "\nnot Glace(elise)\nHomiletic(elise)\nnot Periodic(elise)\nSquint(elise)\nGlace(tamiko)\nHomiletic(tamiko)\nnot Oafish(tamiko)\nforall x (Glace(x) and not Rancorous(x) -> not Periodic(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) and not Oafish(x) -> Periodic(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) and not Rancorous(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Periodic(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Oafish(x) and not Rancorous(x) -> Certified(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) and not Oafish(x) -> Certified(x))\n\nSquint(tamiko)\n\nGlace(tamiko) and not Oafish(tamiko) and forall x (Glace(x) and not Oafish(x) -> Periodic(x)) -> therefore Periodic(tamiko) Periodic(tamiko) and forall x (Periodic(x) -> Squint(x)) -> therefore Squint(tamiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Kylie is not tsaristic. Kylie is pliant. Kylie is not silver. Kylie is squirting. Daren is tsaristic. Daren is pliant. Daren is not sombre. If something is tsaristic and not buttressed then it is not silver. If something is tsaristic and not sombre then it is silver. If something is tsaristic and not buttressed then it is squirting. If something is silver then it is squirting. If something is sombre and not buttressed then it is touched. If something is squirting and not sombre then it is touched. Daren is not squirting.", "logic": "\nnot Tsaristic(kylie)\nPliant(kylie)\nnot Silver(kylie)\nSquirting(kylie)\nTsaristic(daren)\nPliant(daren)\nnot Sombre(daren)\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and not Buttressed(x) -> not Silver(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and not Sombre(x) -> Silver(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and not Buttressed(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Silver(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Sombre(x) and not Buttressed(x) -> Touched(x))\nforall x (Squirting(x) and not Sombre(x) -> Touched(x))\n\nnot Squirting(daren)\n\nTsaristic(daren) and not Sombre(daren) and forall x (Tsaristic(x) and not Sombre(x) -> Silver(x)) -> therefore Silver(daren) Silver(daren) and forall x (Silver(x) -> Squirting(x)) -> therefore Squirting(daren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Kora is not discursive. Kora is vestal. Kora is not offhand. Kora is healthful. Tiphani is discursive. Tiphani is vestal. Tiphani is not tibetan. If something is discursive and not moral then it is not offhand. If something is discursive and not tibetan then it is offhand. If something is discursive and not moral then it is healthful. If something is offhand then it is healthful. If something is tibetan and not moral then it is uphill. If something is healthful and not tibetan then it is uphill. Tiphani is uphill.", "logic": "\nnot Discursive(kora)\nVestal(kora)\nnot Offhand(kora)\nHealthful(kora)\nDiscursive(tiphani)\nVestal(tiphani)\nnot Tibetan(tiphani)\nforall x (Discursive(x) and not Moral(x) -> not Offhand(x))\nforall x (Discursive(x) and not Tibetan(x) -> Offhand(x))\nforall x (Discursive(x) and not Moral(x) -> Healthful(x))\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Healthful(x))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) and not Moral(x) -> Uphill(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) and not Tibetan(x) -> Uphill(x))\n\nUphill(tiphani)\n\nDiscursive(tiphani) and not Tibetan(tiphani) and forall x (Discursive(x) and not Tibetan(x) -> Offhand(x)) -> therefore Offhand(tiphani) Offhand(tiphani) and forall x (Offhand(x) -> Healthful(x)) -> therefore Healthful(tiphani) Healthful(tiphani) and not Tibetan(tiphani) and forall x (Healthful(x) and not Tibetan(x) -> Uphill(x)) -> therefore Uphill(tiphani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Eugen is not mysterious. Eugen is squiffy. Eugen is not muzzy. Eugen is corymbose. Alice is mysterious. Alice is squiffy. Alice is not renewing. If something is mysterious and not copulative then it is not muzzy. If something is mysterious and not renewing then it is muzzy. If something is mysterious and not copulative then it is corymbose. If something is muzzy then it is corymbose. If something is renewing and not copulative then it is caitiff. If something is corymbose and not renewing then it is caitiff. Alice is not caitiff.", "logic": "\nnot Mysterious(eugen)\nSquiffy(eugen)\nnot Muzzy(eugen)\nCorymbose(eugen)\nMysterious(alice)\nSquiffy(alice)\nnot Renewing(alice)\nforall x (Mysterious(x) and not Copulative(x) -> not Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Mysterious(x) and not Renewing(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Mysterious(x) and not Copulative(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Renewing(x) and not Copulative(x) -> Caitiff(x))\nforall x (Corymbose(x) and not Renewing(x) -> Caitiff(x))\n\nnot Caitiff(alice)\n\nMysterious(alice) and not Renewing(alice) and forall x (Mysterious(x) and not Renewing(x) -> Muzzy(x)) -> therefore Muzzy(alice) Muzzy(alice) and forall x (Muzzy(x) -> Corymbose(x)) -> therefore Corymbose(alice) Corymbose(alice) and not Renewing(alice) and forall x (Corymbose(x) and not Renewing(x) -> Caitiff(x)) -> therefore Caitiff(alice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Laney is not fledgeless. Laney is staggering. Laney is not apnoeic. Laney is unruffled. Darb is fledgeless. Darb is staggering. Darb is not yawning. If something is fledgeless and not candescent then it is not apnoeic. If something is fledgeless and not yawning then it is apnoeic. If something is fledgeless and not candescent then it is unruffled. If something is apnoeic then it is unruffled. If something is yawning and not candescent then it is profitless. If something is unruffled and not yawning then it is profitless. Laney is not profitless.", "logic": "\nnot Fledgeless(laney)\nStaggering(laney)\nnot Apnoeic(laney)\nUnruffled(laney)\nFledgeless(darb)\nStaggering(darb)\nnot Yawning(darb)\nforall x (Fledgeless(x) and not Candescent(x) -> not Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Fledgeless(x) and not Yawning(x) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Fledgeless(x) and not Candescent(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Yawning(x) and not Candescent(x) -> Profitless(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) and not Yawning(x) -> Profitless(x))\n\nnot Profitless(laney)\n\nforall x (Yawning(x) and not Candescent(x) -> Profitless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Vinnie is not conventual. Vinnie is saltlike. Vinnie is not laughable. Vinnie is agnostical. Federica is conventual. Federica is saltlike. Federica is not ahorse. If something is conventual and not nativistic then it is not laughable. If something is conventual and not ahorse then it is laughable. If something is conventual and not nativistic then it is agnostical. If something is laughable then it is agnostical. If something is ahorse and not nativistic then it is dogmatical. If something is agnostical and not ahorse then it is dogmatical. Federica is nativistic.", "logic": "\nnot Conventual(vinnie)\nSaltlike(vinnie)\nnot Laughable(vinnie)\nAgnostical(vinnie)\nConventual(federica)\nSaltlike(federica)\nnot Ahorse(federica)\nforall x (Conventual(x) and not Nativistic(x) -> not Laughable(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and not Ahorse(x) -> Laughable(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and not Nativistic(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Laughable(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Ahorse(x) and not Nativistic(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and not Ahorse(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\n\nNativistic(federica)\n\nNativistic(federica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Hill is not unsnarled. Hill is initiatory. Hill is not lidded. Hill is epilithic. Con is unsnarled. Con is initiatory. Con is not rhyming. If something is unsnarled and not shintoist then it is not lidded. If something is unsnarled and not rhyming then it is lidded. If something is unsnarled and not shintoist then it is epilithic. If something is lidded then it is epilithic. If something is rhyming and not shintoist then it is acidulent. If something is epilithic and not rhyming then it is acidulent. Hill is not rhyming.", "logic": "\nnot Unsnarled(hill)\nInitiatory(hill)\nnot Lidded(hill)\nEpilithic(hill)\nUnsnarled(con)\nInitiatory(con)\nnot Rhyming(con)\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) and not Shintoist(x) -> not Lidded(x))\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) and not Rhyming(x) -> Lidded(x))\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) and not Shintoist(x) -> Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Lidded(x) -> Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and not Shintoist(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) and not Rhyming(x) -> Acidulent(x))\n\nnot Rhyming(hill)\n\nnot Rhyming(hill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "Victoria is not xcvii. Victoria is millennian. Victoria is not outer. Victoria is classy. Marylin is xcvii. Marylin is millennian. Marylin is not irritative. If something is xcvii and not unforested then it is not outer. If something is xcvii and not irritative then it is outer. If something is xcvii and not unforested then it is classy. If something is outer then it is classy. If something is irritative and not unforested then it is showy. If something is classy and not irritative then it is showy. Victoria is unforested.", "logic": "\nnot Xcvii(victoria)\nMillennian(victoria)\nnot Outer(victoria)\nClassy(victoria)\nXcvii(marylin)\nMillennian(marylin)\nnot Irritative(marylin)\nforall x (Xcvii(x) and not Unforested(x) -> not Outer(x))\nforall x (Xcvii(x) and not Irritative(x) -> Outer(x))\nforall x (Xcvii(x) and not Unforested(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Irritative(x) and not Unforested(x) -> Showy(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) and not Irritative(x) -> Showy(x))\n\nUnforested(victoria)\n\nUnforested(victoria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-685"} {"premises": "The morganica is analgetic. The morganica is orderly. The morganica tantalize the nickolas. The nickolas is analgetic. The nickolas is orderly. The nickolas is roman. The nickolas wither the morganica. If something wither the morganica then the morganica implore the nickolas. If the morganica implore the nickolas and the nickolas tantalize the morganica then the morganica tantalize the nickolas. If something is analgetic then it wither the morganica. Blue things are sedgelike. If something implore the morganica then the morganica wither the nickolas. If something wither the nickolas and it tantalize the morganica then it is orderly. If something implore the morganica then it wither the morganica. If the morganica is sedgelike then the morganica is dovish. The morganica is analgetic.", "logic": "\nAnalgetic(morganica)\nOrderly(morganica)\nTantalize(morganica, nickolas)\nAnalgetic(nickolas)\nOrderly(nickolas)\nRoman(nickolas)\nWither(nickolas, morganica)\nforall x (Wither(x, morganica) -> Implore(morganica, nickolas))\nImplore(morganica, nickolas) and Tantalize(nickolas, morganica) -> Tantalize(morganica, nickolas)\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Wither(x, morganica))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Sedgelike(x))\nforall x (Implore(x, morganica) -> Wither(morganica, nickolas))\nforall x (Wither(x, nickolas) and Tantalize(x, morganica) -> Orderly(x))\nforall x (Implore(x, morganica) -> Wither(x, morganica))\nSedgelike(morganica) -> Dovish(morganica)\n\nAnalgetic(morganica)\n\ntherefore Analgetic(morganica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3213"} {"premises": "The krystalle is bunglesome. The krystalle is juristic. The krystalle sentence the lindsey. The lindsey is bunglesome. The lindsey is juristic. The lindsey is antinomian. The lindsey lollop the krystalle. If something lollop the krystalle then the krystalle quarry the lindsey. If the krystalle quarry the lindsey and the lindsey sentence the krystalle then the krystalle sentence the lindsey. If something is bunglesome then it lollop the krystalle. Blue things are unfertile. If something quarry the krystalle then the krystalle lollop the lindsey. If something lollop the lindsey and it sentence the krystalle then it is juristic. If something quarry the krystalle then it lollop the krystalle. If the krystalle is unfertile then the krystalle is decurved. The lindsey does not see the krystalle.", "logic": "\nBunglesome(krystalle)\nJuristic(krystalle)\nSentence(krystalle, lindsey)\nBunglesome(lindsey)\nJuristic(lindsey)\nAntinomian(lindsey)\nLollop(lindsey, krystalle)\nforall x (Lollop(x, krystalle) -> Quarry(krystalle, lindsey))\nQuarry(krystalle, lindsey) and Sentence(lindsey, krystalle) -> Sentence(krystalle, lindsey)\nforall x (Bunglesome(x) -> Lollop(x, krystalle))\nforall x (Bunglesome(x) -> Unfertile(x))\nforall x (Quarry(x, krystalle) -> Lollop(krystalle, lindsey))\nforall x (Lollop(x, lindsey) and Sentence(x, krystalle) -> Juristic(x))\nforall x (Quarry(x, krystalle) -> Lollop(x, krystalle))\nUnfertile(krystalle) -> Decurved(krystalle)\n\nnot Lollop(lindsey, krystalle)\n\ntherefore Lollop(lindsey, krystalle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3213"} {"premises": "The hendrika is final. The hendrika is bantu. The hendrika convey the jocelyn. The jocelyn is final. The jocelyn is bantu. The jocelyn is monegasque. The jocelyn mount the hendrika. If something mount the hendrika then the hendrika sightsing the jocelyn. If the hendrika sightsing the jocelyn and the jocelyn convey the hendrika then the hendrika convey the jocelyn. If something is final then it mount the hendrika. Blue things are ghostly. If something sightsing the hendrika then the hendrika mount the jocelyn. If something mount the jocelyn and it convey the hendrika then it is bantu. If something sightsing the hendrika then it mount the hendrika. If the hendrika is ghostly then the hendrika is blissful. The hendrika does not see the jocelyn.", "logic": "\nFinal(hendrika)\nBantu(hendrika)\nConvey(hendrika, jocelyn)\nFinal(jocelyn)\nBantu(jocelyn)\nMonegasque(jocelyn)\nMount(jocelyn, hendrika)\nforall x (Mount(x, hendrika) -> Sightsing(hendrika, jocelyn))\nSightsing(hendrika, jocelyn) and Convey(jocelyn, hendrika) -> Convey(hendrika, jocelyn)\nforall x (Final(x) -> Mount(x, hendrika))\nforall x (Final(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, hendrika) -> Mount(hendrika, jocelyn))\nforall x (Mount(x, jocelyn) and Convey(x, hendrika) -> Bantu(x))\nforall x (Sightsing(x, hendrika) -> Mount(x, hendrika))\nGhostly(hendrika) -> Blissful(hendrika)\n\nnot Mount(hendrika, jocelyn)\n\nforall x (Sightsing(x, hendrika) -> Mount(hendrika, jocelyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3213"} {"premises": "The ilana is eightieth. The ilana is unfaithful. The ilana ticktack the guthry. The guthry is eightieth. The guthry is unfaithful. The guthry is gleaming. The guthry liquidize the ilana. If something liquidize the ilana then the ilana dwindle the guthry. If the ilana dwindle the guthry and the guthry ticktack the ilana then the ilana ticktack the guthry. If something is eightieth then it liquidize the ilana. Blue things are lumpy. If something dwindle the ilana then the ilana liquidize the guthry. If something liquidize the guthry and it ticktack the ilana then it is unfaithful. If something dwindle the ilana then it liquidize the ilana. If the ilana is lumpy then the ilana is efficient. The guthry dwindle the ilana.", "logic": "\nEightieth(ilana)\nUnfaithful(ilana)\nTicktack(ilana, guthry)\nEightieth(guthry)\nUnfaithful(guthry)\nGleaming(guthry)\nLiquidize(guthry, ilana)\nforall x (Liquidize(x, ilana) -> Dwindle(ilana, guthry))\nDwindle(ilana, guthry) and Ticktack(guthry, ilana) -> Ticktack(ilana, guthry)\nforall x (Eightieth(x) -> Liquidize(x, ilana))\nforall x (Eightieth(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Dwindle(x, ilana) -> Liquidize(ilana, guthry))\nforall x (Liquidize(x, guthry) and Ticktack(x, ilana) -> Unfaithful(x))\nforall x (Dwindle(x, ilana) -> Liquidize(x, ilana))\nLumpy(ilana) -> Efficient(ilana)\n\nDwindle(guthry, ilana)\n\nDwindle(guthry, ilana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3213"} {"premises": "Olle is donnish. Zechariah is donnish. Kind, indisposed things are disposed. If Olle is donnish then Olle is indisposed. Green, rheumy things are donnish. All disposed things are slithery. Nice things are rheumy. All huxleyan, rheumy things are disposed. Zechariah is donnish.", "logic": "\nDonnish(olle)\nDonnish(zechariah)\nforall x (Rheumy(x) and Indisposed(x) -> Disposed(x))\nDonnish(olle) -> Indisposed(olle)\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) and Rheumy(x) -> Donnish(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> Slithery(x))\nforall x (Donnish(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) and Rheumy(x) -> Disposed(x))\n\nDonnish(zechariah)\n\ntherefore Donnish(zechariah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Melli is mongol. Jenna is mongol. Kind, licensed things are wasteful. If Melli is mongol then Melli is licensed. Green, scaphoid things are mongol. All wasteful things are polyhedral. Nice things are scaphoid. All schoolwide, scaphoid things are wasteful. Melli is not mongol.", "logic": "\nMongol(melli)\nMongol(jenna)\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) and Licensed(x) -> Wasteful(x))\nMongol(melli) -> Licensed(melli)\nforall x (Schoolwide(x) and Scaphoid(x) -> Mongol(x))\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Polyhedral(x))\nforall x (Mongol(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Schoolwide(x) and Scaphoid(x) -> Wasteful(x))\n\nnot Mongol(melli)\n\ntherefore Mongol(melli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Gladi is manual. Vladamir is manual. Kind, dank things are timbered. If Gladi is manual then Gladi is dank. Green, unblessed things are manual. All timbered things are clubable. Nice things are unblessed. All undraped, unblessed things are timbered. Vladamir is unblessed.", "logic": "\nManual(gladi)\nManual(vladamir)\nforall x (Unblessed(x) and Dank(x) -> Timbered(x))\nManual(gladi) -> Dank(gladi)\nforall x (Undraped(x) and Unblessed(x) -> Manual(x))\nforall x (Timbered(x) -> Clubable(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Undraped(x) and Unblessed(x) -> Timbered(x))\n\nUnblessed(vladamir)\n\nManual(vladamir) and forall x (Manual(x) -> Unblessed(x)) -> therefore Unblessed(vladamir)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Ashli is towheaded. Benson is towheaded. Kind, putrid things are tearless. If Ashli is towheaded then Ashli is putrid. Green, dioestrual things are towheaded. All tearless things are earthlike. Nice things are dioestrual. All saponified, dioestrual things are tearless. Ashli is not dioestrual.", "logic": "\nTowheaded(ashli)\nTowheaded(benson)\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) and Putrid(x) -> Tearless(x))\nTowheaded(ashli) -> Putrid(ashli)\nforall x (Saponified(x) and Dioestrual(x) -> Towheaded(x))\nforall x (Tearless(x) -> Earthlike(x))\nforall x (Towheaded(x) -> Dioestrual(x))\nforall x (Saponified(x) and Dioestrual(x) -> Tearless(x))\n\nnot Dioestrual(ashli)\n\nTowheaded(ashli) and forall x (Towheaded(x) -> Dioestrual(x)) -> therefore Dioestrual(ashli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Raimund is shuha. Blisse is shuha. Kind, paranormal things are asiatic. If Raimund is shuha then Raimund is paranormal. Green, innermost things are shuha. All asiatic things are forgiving. Nice things are innermost. All authentic, innermost things are asiatic. Raimund is asiatic.", "logic": "\nShuha(raimund)\nShuha(blisse)\nforall x (Innermost(x) and Paranormal(x) -> Asiatic(x))\nShuha(raimund) -> Paranormal(raimund)\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Innermost(x) -> Shuha(x))\nforall x (Asiatic(x) -> Forgiving(x))\nforall x (Shuha(x) -> Innermost(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Innermost(x) -> Asiatic(x))\n\nAsiatic(raimund)\n\nShuha(raimund) and forall x (Shuha(x) -> Innermost(x)) -> therefore Innermost(raimund) Shuha(raimund) and Shuha(raimund) -> Paranormal(raimund) -> therefore Paranormal(raimund) Innermost(raimund) and Paranormal(raimund) and forall x (Innermost(x) and Paranormal(x) -> Asiatic(x)) -> therefore Asiatic(raimund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Sissie is opencast. Remington is opencast. Kind, biserrate things are tricksy. If Sissie is opencast then Sissie is biserrate. Green, governing things are opencast. All tricksy things are governable. Nice things are governing. All awash, governing things are tricksy. Sissie is not tricksy.", "logic": "\nOpencast(sissie)\nOpencast(remington)\nforall x (Governing(x) and Biserrate(x) -> Tricksy(x))\nOpencast(sissie) -> Biserrate(sissie)\nforall x (Awash(x) and Governing(x) -> Opencast(x))\nforall x (Tricksy(x) -> Governable(x))\nforall x (Opencast(x) -> Governing(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Governing(x) -> Tricksy(x))\n\nnot Tricksy(sissie)\n\nOpencast(sissie) and forall x (Opencast(x) -> Governing(x)) -> therefore Governing(sissie) Opencast(sissie) and Opencast(sissie) -> Biserrate(sissie) -> therefore Biserrate(sissie) Governing(sissie) and Biserrate(sissie) and forall x (Governing(x) and Biserrate(x) -> Tricksy(x)) -> therefore Tricksy(sissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Mareah is passionate. Felix is passionate. Kind, pubertal things are exportable. If Mareah is passionate then Mareah is pubertal. Green, autoecious things are passionate. All exportable things are nonsweet. Nice things are autoecious. All squarish, autoecious things are exportable. Mareah is nonsweet.", "logic": "\nPassionate(mareah)\nPassionate(felix)\nforall x (Autoecious(x) and Pubertal(x) -> Exportable(x))\nPassionate(mareah) -> Pubertal(mareah)\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Passionate(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) -> Nonsweet(x))\nforall x (Passionate(x) -> Autoecious(x))\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Exportable(x))\n\nNonsweet(mareah)\n\nPassionate(mareah) and forall x (Passionate(x) -> Autoecious(x)) -> therefore Autoecious(mareah) Passionate(mareah) and Passionate(mareah) -> Pubertal(mareah) -> therefore Pubertal(mareah) Autoecious(mareah) and Pubertal(mareah) and forall x (Autoecious(x) and Pubertal(x) -> Exportable(x)) -> therefore Exportable(mareah) Exportable(mareah) and forall x (Exportable(x) -> Nonsweet(x)) -> therefore Nonsweet(mareah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Storey is gamy. Carol is gamy. Kind, frigid things are liquefied. If Storey is gamy then Storey is frigid. Green, critical things are gamy. All liquefied things are marian. Nice things are critical. All assistive, critical things are liquefied. Storey is not marian.", "logic": "\nGamy(storey)\nGamy(carol)\nforall x (Critical(x) and Frigid(x) -> Liquefied(x))\nGamy(storey) -> Frigid(storey)\nforall x (Assistive(x) and Critical(x) -> Gamy(x))\nforall x (Liquefied(x) -> Marian(x))\nforall x (Gamy(x) -> Critical(x))\nforall x (Assistive(x) and Critical(x) -> Liquefied(x))\n\nnot Marian(storey)\n\nGamy(storey) and forall x (Gamy(x) -> Critical(x)) -> therefore Critical(storey) Gamy(storey) and Gamy(storey) -> Frigid(storey) -> therefore Frigid(storey) Critical(storey) and Frigid(storey) and forall x (Critical(x) and Frigid(x) -> Liquefied(x)) -> therefore Liquefied(storey) Liquefied(storey) and forall x (Liquefied(x) -> Marian(x)) -> therefore Marian(storey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Amalea is mythologic. Dario is mythologic. Kind, violated things are unwary. If Amalea is mythologic then Amalea is violated. Green, shorthand things are mythologic. All unwary things are tantric. Nice things are shorthand. All impudent, shorthand things are unwary. Dario is not unwary.", "logic": "\nMythologic(amalea)\nMythologic(dario)\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Violated(x) -> Unwary(x))\nMythologic(amalea) -> Violated(amalea)\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Mythologic(x))\nforall x (Unwary(x) -> Tantric(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Unwary(x))\n\nnot Unwary(dario)\n\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Violated(x) -> Unwary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Hollie is ducal. Bianka is ducal. Kind, cylindric things are hispid. If Hollie is ducal then Hollie is cylindric. Green, apostolic things are ducal. All hispid things are treelike. Nice things are apostolic. All katharobic, apostolic things are hispid. Bianka is treelike.", "logic": "\nDucal(hollie)\nDucal(bianka)\nforall x (Apostolic(x) and Cylindric(x) -> Hispid(x))\nDucal(hollie) -> Cylindric(hollie)\nforall x (Katharobic(x) and Apostolic(x) -> Ducal(x))\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Treelike(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) -> Apostolic(x))\nforall x (Katharobic(x) and Apostolic(x) -> Hispid(x))\n\nTreelike(bianka)\n\nforall x (Hispid(x) -> Treelike(x)) <- forall x (Apostolic(x) and Cylindric(x) -> Hispid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Rowe is crass. Piggy is crass. Kind, recreant things are napped. If Rowe is crass then Rowe is recreant. Green, generic things are crass. All napped things are paired. Nice things are generic. All reechoing, generic things are napped. Piggy is not big.", "logic": "\nCrass(rowe)\nCrass(piggy)\nforall x (Generic(x) and Recreant(x) -> Napped(x))\nCrass(rowe) -> Recreant(rowe)\nforall x (Reechoing(x) and Generic(x) -> Crass(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) -> Paired(x))\nforall x (Crass(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) and Generic(x) -> Napped(x))\n\nnot Big(piggy)\n\nnot Big(piggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Zebadiah is ghanian. Hynda is ghanian. Kind, murdered things are coiled. If Zebadiah is ghanian then Zebadiah is murdered. Green, thumbed things are ghanian. All coiled things are hieratic. Nice things are thumbed. All feminine, thumbed things are coiled. Hynda is murdered.", "logic": "\nGhanian(zebadiah)\nGhanian(hynda)\nforall x (Thumbed(x) and Murdered(x) -> Coiled(x))\nGhanian(zebadiah) -> Murdered(zebadiah)\nforall x (Feminine(x) and Thumbed(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) -> Hieratic(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Thumbed(x))\nforall x (Feminine(x) and Thumbed(x) -> Coiled(x))\n\nMurdered(hynda)\n\nMurdered(hynda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Evelyn is turkmen. Issie is turkmen. Kind, gruesome things are privy. If Evelyn is turkmen then Evelyn is gruesome. Green, crumbly things are turkmen. All privy things are battered. Nice things are crumbly. All mastoid, crumbly things are privy. Evelyn is not mastoid.", "logic": "\nTurkmen(evelyn)\nTurkmen(issie)\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Gruesome(x) -> Privy(x))\nTurkmen(evelyn) -> Gruesome(evelyn)\nforall x (Mastoid(x) and Crumbly(x) -> Turkmen(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) -> Battered(x))\nforall x (Turkmen(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) and Crumbly(x) -> Privy(x))\n\nnot Mastoid(evelyn)\n\nnot Mastoid(evelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "Carlton is venous. Shandie is venous. Kind, embodied things are sapid. If Carlton is venous then Carlton is embodied. Green, ginger things are venous. All sapid things are frore. Nice things are ginger. All unlivable, ginger things are sapid. Shandie is unlivable.", "logic": "\nVenous(carlton)\nVenous(shandie)\nforall x (Ginger(x) and Embodied(x) -> Sapid(x))\nVenous(carlton) -> Embodied(carlton)\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Ginger(x) -> Venous(x))\nforall x (Sapid(x) -> Frore(x))\nforall x (Venous(x) -> Ginger(x))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Ginger(x) -> Sapid(x))\n\nUnlivable(shandie)\n\nUnlivable(shandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1797"} {"premises": "The aleks buckle the kori. The aleks augment the kinna. The kori buckle the aleks. The kori buckle the kinna. The kori buckle the pegeen. The kinna buckle the aleks. The kinna augment the pegeen. The pegeen is subalpine. The pegeen is bigheaded. The pegeen augment the kinna. If the kori note the kinna then the kori is soused. If someone is windburnt then they need the kori. If someone buckle the kinna then they eat the kinna. If someone is windburnt then they need the kori. If someone note the aleks then they are windburnt. If the kori buckle the aleks then the kori note the pegeen. If someone augment the pegeen and they chase the kinna then the kinna augment the pegeen. If someone is soused then they need the pegeen. The pegeen is bigheaded.", "logic": "\nBuckle(aleks, kori)\nAugment(aleks, kinna)\nBuckle(kori, aleks)\nBuckle(kori, kinna)\nBuckle(kori, pegeen)\nBuckle(kinna, aleks)\nAugment(kinna, pegeen)\nSubalpine(pegeen)\nBigheaded(pegeen)\nAugment(pegeen, kinna)\nNote(kori, kinna) -> Soused(kori)\nforall x (Windburnt(x) -> Augment(x, kori))\nforall x (Buckle(x, kinna) -> Note(x, kinna))\nforall x (Windburnt(x) -> Augment(x, kori))\nforall x (Note(x, aleks) -> Windburnt(x))\nBuckle(kori, aleks) -> Note(kori, pegeen)\nforall x (Augment(x, pegeen) and Buckle(x, kinna) -> Augment(kinna, pegeen))\nforall x (Soused(x) -> Augment(x, pegeen))\n\nBigheaded(pegeen)\n\ntherefore Bigheaded(pegeen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The alys slat the gerti. The alys baste the olimpia. The gerti slat the alys. The gerti slat the olimpia. The gerti slat the wesley. The olimpia slat the alys. The olimpia baste the wesley. The wesley is excessive. The wesley is german. The wesley baste the olimpia. If the gerti stream the olimpia then the gerti is coagulate. If someone is ninety then they need the gerti. If someone slat the olimpia then they eat the olimpia. If someone is ninety then they need the gerti. If someone stream the alys then they are ninety. If the gerti slat the alys then the gerti stream the wesley. If someone baste the wesley and they chase the olimpia then the olimpia baste the wesley. If someone is coagulate then they need the wesley. The wesley is not german.", "logic": "\nSlat(alys, gerti)\nBaste(alys, olimpia)\nSlat(gerti, alys)\nSlat(gerti, olimpia)\nSlat(gerti, wesley)\nSlat(olimpia, alys)\nBaste(olimpia, wesley)\nExcessive(wesley)\nGerman(wesley)\nBaste(wesley, olimpia)\nStream(gerti, olimpia) -> Coagulate(gerti)\nforall x (Ninety(x) -> Baste(x, gerti))\nforall x (Slat(x, olimpia) -> Stream(x, olimpia))\nforall x (Ninety(x) -> Baste(x, gerti))\nforall x (Stream(x, alys) -> Ninety(x))\nSlat(gerti, alys) -> Stream(gerti, wesley)\nforall x (Baste(x, wesley) and Slat(x, olimpia) -> Baste(olimpia, wesley))\nforall x (Coagulate(x) -> Baste(x, wesley))\n\nnot German(wesley)\n\ntherefore German(wesley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The sibyl build the bridgette. The sibyl acquire the hanford. The bridgette build the sibyl. The bridgette build the hanford. The bridgette build the chelsey. The hanford build the sibyl. The hanford acquire the chelsey. The chelsey is blanket. The chelsey is decreased. The chelsey acquire the hanford. If the bridgette position the hanford then the bridgette is hulking. If someone is benign then they need the bridgette. If someone build the hanford then they eat the hanford. If someone is benign then they need the bridgette. If someone position the sibyl then they are benign. If the bridgette build the sibyl then the bridgette position the chelsey. If someone acquire the chelsey and they chase the hanford then the hanford acquire the chelsey. If someone is hulking then they need the chelsey. The bridgette position the chelsey.", "logic": "\nBuild(sibyl, bridgette)\nAcquire(sibyl, hanford)\nBuild(bridgette, sibyl)\nBuild(bridgette, hanford)\nBuild(bridgette, chelsey)\nBuild(hanford, sibyl)\nAcquire(hanford, chelsey)\nBlanket(chelsey)\nDecreased(chelsey)\nAcquire(chelsey, hanford)\nPosition(bridgette, hanford) -> Hulking(bridgette)\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Acquire(x, bridgette))\nforall x (Build(x, hanford) -> Position(x, hanford))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Acquire(x, bridgette))\nforall x (Position(x, sibyl) -> Benign(x))\nBuild(bridgette, sibyl) -> Position(bridgette, chelsey)\nforall x (Acquire(x, chelsey) and Build(x, hanford) -> Acquire(hanford, chelsey))\nforall x (Hulking(x) -> Acquire(x, chelsey))\n\nPosition(bridgette, chelsey)\n\nBuild(bridgette, sibyl) and Build(bridgette, sibyl) -> Position(bridgette, chelsey) -> therefore Position(bridgette, chelsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The malcah bread the nerti. The malcah avianize the lavinia. The nerti bread the malcah. The nerti bread the lavinia. The nerti bread the englebart. The lavinia bread the malcah. The lavinia avianize the englebart. The englebart is eccentric. The englebart is casual. The englebart avianize the lavinia. If the nerti resole the lavinia then the nerti is cervine. If someone is unhatched then they need the nerti. If someone bread the lavinia then they eat the lavinia. If someone is unhatched then they need the nerti. If someone resole the malcah then they are unhatched. If the nerti bread the malcah then the nerti resole the englebart. If someone avianize the englebart and they chase the lavinia then the lavinia avianize the englebart. If someone is cervine then they need the englebart. The nerti does not eat the lavinia.", "logic": "\nBread(malcah, nerti)\nAvianize(malcah, lavinia)\nBread(nerti, malcah)\nBread(nerti, lavinia)\nBread(nerti, englebart)\nBread(lavinia, malcah)\nAvianize(lavinia, englebart)\nEccentric(englebart)\nCasual(englebart)\nAvianize(englebart, lavinia)\nResole(nerti, lavinia) -> Cervine(nerti)\nforall x (Unhatched(x) -> Avianize(x, nerti))\nforall x (Bread(x, lavinia) -> Resole(x, lavinia))\nforall x (Unhatched(x) -> Avianize(x, nerti))\nforall x (Resole(x, malcah) -> Unhatched(x))\nBread(nerti, malcah) -> Resole(nerti, englebart)\nforall x (Avianize(x, englebart) and Bread(x, lavinia) -> Avianize(lavinia, englebart))\nforall x (Cervine(x) -> Avianize(x, englebart))\n\nnot Resole(nerti, lavinia)\n\nBread(nerti, lavinia) and forall x (Bread(x, lavinia) -> Resole(x, lavinia)) -> therefore Resole(nerti, lavinia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The jefferey capsulate the moises. The jefferey convoke the felicle. The moises capsulate the jefferey. The moises capsulate the felicle. The moises capsulate the raynell. The felicle capsulate the jefferey. The felicle convoke the raynell. The raynell is dietetical. The raynell is suave. The raynell convoke the felicle. If the moises stream the felicle then the moises is ungodly. If someone is titanic then they need the moises. If someone capsulate the felicle then they eat the felicle. If someone is titanic then they need the moises. If someone stream the jefferey then they are titanic. If the moises capsulate the jefferey then the moises stream the raynell. If someone convoke the raynell and they chase the felicle then the felicle convoke the raynell. If someone is ungodly then they need the raynell. The moises is ungodly.", "logic": "\nCapsulate(jefferey, moises)\nConvoke(jefferey, felicle)\nCapsulate(moises, jefferey)\nCapsulate(moises, felicle)\nCapsulate(moises, raynell)\nCapsulate(felicle, jefferey)\nConvoke(felicle, raynell)\nDietetical(raynell)\nSuave(raynell)\nConvoke(raynell, felicle)\nStream(moises, felicle) -> Ungodly(moises)\nforall x (Titanic(x) -> Convoke(x, moises))\nforall x (Capsulate(x, felicle) -> Stream(x, felicle))\nforall x (Titanic(x) -> Convoke(x, moises))\nforall x (Stream(x, jefferey) -> Titanic(x))\nCapsulate(moises, jefferey) -> Stream(moises, raynell)\nforall x (Convoke(x, raynell) and Capsulate(x, felicle) -> Convoke(felicle, raynell))\nforall x (Ungodly(x) -> Convoke(x, raynell))\n\nUngodly(moises)\n\nCapsulate(moises, felicle) and forall x (Capsulate(x, felicle) -> Stream(x, felicle)) -> therefore Stream(moises, felicle) Stream(moises, felicle) and Stream(moises, felicle) -> Ungodly(moises) -> therefore Ungodly(moises)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The reynold objurgate the dory. The reynold shellac the lizbeth. The dory objurgate the reynold. The dory objurgate the lizbeth. The dory objurgate the ofelia. The lizbeth objurgate the reynold. The lizbeth shellac the ofelia. The ofelia is utile. The ofelia is unthankful. The ofelia shellac the lizbeth. If the dory outfox the lizbeth then the dory is sinhala. If someone is acetous then they need the dory. If someone objurgate the lizbeth then they eat the lizbeth. If someone is acetous then they need the dory. If someone outfox the reynold then they are acetous. If the dory objurgate the reynold then the dory outfox the ofelia. If someone shellac the ofelia and they chase the lizbeth then the lizbeth shellac the ofelia. If someone is sinhala then they need the ofelia. The dory is not sinhala.", "logic": "\nObjurgate(reynold, dory)\nShellac(reynold, lizbeth)\nObjurgate(dory, reynold)\nObjurgate(dory, lizbeth)\nObjurgate(dory, ofelia)\nObjurgate(lizbeth, reynold)\nShellac(lizbeth, ofelia)\nUtile(ofelia)\nUnthankful(ofelia)\nShellac(ofelia, lizbeth)\nOutfox(dory, lizbeth) -> Sinhala(dory)\nforall x (Acetous(x) -> Shellac(x, dory))\nforall x (Objurgate(x, lizbeth) -> Outfox(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Acetous(x) -> Shellac(x, dory))\nforall x (Outfox(x, reynold) -> Acetous(x))\nObjurgate(dory, reynold) -> Outfox(dory, ofelia)\nforall x (Shellac(x, ofelia) and Objurgate(x, lizbeth) -> Shellac(lizbeth, ofelia))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Shellac(x, ofelia))\n\nnot Sinhala(dory)\n\nObjurgate(dory, lizbeth) and forall x (Objurgate(x, lizbeth) -> Outfox(x, lizbeth)) -> therefore Outfox(dory, lizbeth) Outfox(dory, lizbeth) and Outfox(dory, lizbeth) -> Sinhala(dory) -> therefore Sinhala(dory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The diamond swage the bela. The diamond last the ellynn. The bela swage the diamond. The bela swage the ellynn. The bela swage the kori. The ellynn swage the diamond. The ellynn last the kori. The kori is arcane. The kori is demanding. The kori last the ellynn. If the bela dupe the ellynn then the bela is graded. If someone is hugoesque then they need the bela. If someone swage the ellynn then they eat the ellynn. If someone is hugoesque then they need the bela. If someone dupe the diamond then they are hugoesque. If the bela swage the diamond then the bela dupe the kori. If someone last the kori and they chase the ellynn then the ellynn last the kori. If someone is graded then they need the kori. The bela last the kori.", "logic": "\nSwage(diamond, bela)\nLast(diamond, ellynn)\nSwage(bela, diamond)\nSwage(bela, ellynn)\nSwage(bela, kori)\nSwage(ellynn, diamond)\nLast(ellynn, kori)\nArcane(kori)\nDemanding(kori)\nLast(kori, ellynn)\nDupe(bela, ellynn) -> Graded(bela)\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) -> Last(x, bela))\nforall x (Swage(x, ellynn) -> Dupe(x, ellynn))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) -> Last(x, bela))\nforall x (Dupe(x, diamond) -> Hugoesque(x))\nSwage(bela, diamond) -> Dupe(bela, kori)\nforall x (Last(x, kori) and Swage(x, ellynn) -> Last(ellynn, kori))\nforall x (Graded(x) -> Last(x, kori))\n\nLast(bela, kori)\n\nSwage(bela, ellynn) and forall x (Swage(x, ellynn) -> Dupe(x, ellynn)) -> therefore Dupe(bela, ellynn) Dupe(bela, ellynn) and Dupe(bela, ellynn) -> Graded(bela) -> therefore Graded(bela) Graded(bela) and forall x (Graded(x) -> Last(x, kori)) -> therefore Last(bela, kori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The karleen scant the bennie. The karleen actualize the cyrill. The bennie scant the karleen. The bennie scant the cyrill. The bennie scant the marco. The cyrill scant the karleen. The cyrill actualize the marco. The marco is totalistic. The marco is mastered. The marco actualize the cyrill. If the bennie glissade the cyrill then the bennie is gingival. If someone is nerveless then they need the bennie. If someone scant the cyrill then they eat the cyrill. If someone is nerveless then they need the bennie. If someone glissade the karleen then they are nerveless. If the bennie scant the karleen then the bennie glissade the marco. If someone actualize the marco and they chase the cyrill then the cyrill actualize the marco. If someone is gingival then they need the marco. The bennie does not need the marco.", "logic": "\nScant(karleen, bennie)\nActualize(karleen, cyrill)\nScant(bennie, karleen)\nScant(bennie, cyrill)\nScant(bennie, marco)\nScant(cyrill, karleen)\nActualize(cyrill, marco)\nTotalistic(marco)\nMastered(marco)\nActualize(marco, cyrill)\nGlissade(bennie, cyrill) -> Gingival(bennie)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Actualize(x, bennie))\nforall x (Scant(x, cyrill) -> Glissade(x, cyrill))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Actualize(x, bennie))\nforall x (Glissade(x, karleen) -> Nerveless(x))\nScant(bennie, karleen) -> Glissade(bennie, marco)\nforall x (Actualize(x, marco) and Scant(x, cyrill) -> Actualize(cyrill, marco))\nforall x (Gingival(x) -> Actualize(x, marco))\n\nnot Actualize(bennie, marco)\n\nScant(bennie, cyrill) and forall x (Scant(x, cyrill) -> Glissade(x, cyrill)) -> therefore Glissade(bennie, cyrill) Glissade(bennie, cyrill) and Glissade(bennie, cyrill) -> Gingival(bennie) -> therefore Gingival(bennie) Gingival(bennie) and forall x (Gingival(x) -> Actualize(x, marco)) -> therefore Actualize(bennie, marco)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The julianne check the rodger. The julianne commandeer the adore. The rodger check the julianne. The rodger check the adore. The rodger check the cindelyn. The adore check the julianne. The adore commandeer the cindelyn. The cindelyn is intriguing. The cindelyn is nihilistic. The cindelyn commandeer the adore. If the rodger jactitate the adore then the rodger is pettish. If someone is neckless then they need the rodger. If someone check the adore then they eat the adore. If someone is neckless then they need the rodger. If someone jactitate the julianne then they are neckless. If the rodger check the julianne then the rodger jactitate the cindelyn. If someone commandeer the cindelyn and they chase the adore then the adore commandeer the cindelyn. If someone is pettish then they need the cindelyn. The adore does not eat the adore.", "logic": "\nCheck(julianne, rodger)\nCommandeer(julianne, adore)\nCheck(rodger, julianne)\nCheck(rodger, adore)\nCheck(rodger, cindelyn)\nCheck(adore, julianne)\nCommandeer(adore, cindelyn)\nIntriguing(cindelyn)\nNihilistic(cindelyn)\nCommandeer(cindelyn, adore)\nJactitate(rodger, adore) -> Pettish(rodger)\nforall x (Neckless(x) -> Commandeer(x, rodger))\nforall x (Check(x, adore) -> Jactitate(x, adore))\nforall x (Neckless(x) -> Commandeer(x, rodger))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, julianne) -> Neckless(x))\nCheck(rodger, julianne) -> Jactitate(rodger, cindelyn)\nforall x (Commandeer(x, cindelyn) and Check(x, adore) -> Commandeer(adore, cindelyn))\nforall x (Pettish(x) -> Commandeer(x, cindelyn))\n\nnot Jactitate(adore, adore)\n\nforall x (Check(x, adore) -> Jactitate(x, adore)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The nolan colonize the kathe. The nolan surcharge the adriena. The kathe colonize the nolan. The kathe colonize the adriena. The kathe colonize the clemente. The adriena colonize the nolan. The adriena surcharge the clemente. The clemente is gelid. The clemente is weeping. The clemente surcharge the adriena. If the kathe market the adriena then the kathe is newtonian. If someone is squared then they need the kathe. If someone colonize the adriena then they eat the adriena. If someone is squared then they need the kathe. If someone market the nolan then they are squared. If the kathe colonize the nolan then the kathe market the clemente. If someone surcharge the clemente and they chase the adriena then the adriena surcharge the clemente. If someone is newtonian then they need the clemente. The adriena is squared.", "logic": "\nColonize(nolan, kathe)\nSurcharge(nolan, adriena)\nColonize(kathe, nolan)\nColonize(kathe, adriena)\nColonize(kathe, clemente)\nColonize(adriena, nolan)\nSurcharge(adriena, clemente)\nGelid(clemente)\nWeeping(clemente)\nSurcharge(clemente, adriena)\nMarket(kathe, adriena) -> Newtonian(kathe)\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Surcharge(x, kathe))\nforall x (Colonize(x, adriena) -> Market(x, adriena))\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Surcharge(x, kathe))\nforall x (Market(x, nolan) -> Squared(x))\nColonize(kathe, nolan) -> Market(kathe, clemente)\nforall x (Surcharge(x, clemente) and Colonize(x, adriena) -> Surcharge(adriena, clemente))\nforall x (Newtonian(x) -> Surcharge(x, clemente))\n\nSquared(adriena)\n\nforall x (Market(x, nolan) -> Squared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The maynord cart the shane. The maynord oxidize the dorisa. The shane cart the maynord. The shane cart the dorisa. The shane cart the fleurette. The dorisa cart the maynord. The dorisa oxidize the fleurette. The fleurette is unarguable. The fleurette is olivelike. The fleurette oxidize the dorisa. If the shane fullback the dorisa then the shane is valorous. If someone is automated then they need the shane. If someone cart the dorisa then they eat the dorisa. If someone is automated then they need the shane. If someone fullback the maynord then they are automated. If the shane cart the maynord then the shane fullback the fleurette. If someone oxidize the fleurette and they chase the dorisa then the dorisa oxidize the fleurette. If someone is valorous then they need the fleurette. The shane is not automated.", "logic": "\nCart(maynord, shane)\nOxidize(maynord, dorisa)\nCart(shane, maynord)\nCart(shane, dorisa)\nCart(shane, fleurette)\nCart(dorisa, maynord)\nOxidize(dorisa, fleurette)\nUnarguable(fleurette)\nOlivelike(fleurette)\nOxidize(fleurette, dorisa)\nFullback(shane, dorisa) -> Valorous(shane)\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Oxidize(x, shane))\nforall x (Cart(x, dorisa) -> Fullback(x, dorisa))\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Oxidize(x, shane))\nforall x (Fullback(x, maynord) -> Automated(x))\nCart(shane, maynord) -> Fullback(shane, fleurette)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, fleurette) and Cart(x, dorisa) -> Oxidize(dorisa, fleurette))\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> Oxidize(x, fleurette))\n\nnot Automated(shane)\n\nforall x (Fullback(x, maynord) -> Automated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The vince inebriate the giuseppe. The vince displume the catherina. The giuseppe inebriate the vince. The giuseppe inebriate the catherina. The giuseppe inebriate the daisey. The catherina inebriate the vince. The catherina displume the daisey. The daisey is venereal. The daisey is macabre. The daisey displume the catherina. If the giuseppe appeal the catherina then the giuseppe is askew. If someone is blighted then they need the giuseppe. If someone inebriate the catherina then they eat the catherina. If someone is blighted then they need the giuseppe. If someone appeal the vince then they are blighted. If the giuseppe inebriate the vince then the giuseppe appeal the daisey. If someone displume the daisey and they chase the catherina then the catherina displume the daisey. If someone is askew then they need the daisey. The vince displume the giuseppe.", "logic": "\nInebriate(vince, giuseppe)\nDisplume(vince, catherina)\nInebriate(giuseppe, vince)\nInebriate(giuseppe, catherina)\nInebriate(giuseppe, daisey)\nInebriate(catherina, vince)\nDisplume(catherina, daisey)\nVenereal(daisey)\nMacabre(daisey)\nDisplume(daisey, catherina)\nAppeal(giuseppe, catherina) -> Askew(giuseppe)\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Displume(x, giuseppe))\nforall x (Inebriate(x, catherina) -> Appeal(x, catherina))\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Displume(x, giuseppe))\nforall x (Appeal(x, vince) -> Blighted(x))\nInebriate(giuseppe, vince) -> Appeal(giuseppe, daisey)\nforall x (Displume(x, daisey) and Inebriate(x, catherina) -> Displume(catherina, daisey))\nforall x (Askew(x) -> Displume(x, daisey))\n\nDisplume(vince, giuseppe)\n\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Displume(x, giuseppe)) <- forall x (Appeal(x, vince) -> Blighted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The seymour somersault the owen. The seymour hack the morty. The owen somersault the seymour. The owen somersault the morty. The owen somersault the janna. The morty somersault the seymour. The morty hack the janna. The janna is guyanese. The janna is hemal. The janna hack the morty. If the owen squeeze the morty then the owen is biomedical. If someone is defensive then they need the owen. If someone somersault the morty then they eat the morty. If someone is defensive then they need the owen. If someone squeeze the seymour then they are defensive. If the owen somersault the seymour then the owen squeeze the janna. If someone hack the janna and they chase the morty then the morty hack the janna. If someone is biomedical then they need the janna. The owen does not need the morty.", "logic": "\nSomersault(seymour, owen)\nHack(seymour, morty)\nSomersault(owen, seymour)\nSomersault(owen, morty)\nSomersault(owen, janna)\nSomersault(morty, seymour)\nHack(morty, janna)\nGuyanese(janna)\nHemal(janna)\nHack(janna, morty)\nSqueeze(owen, morty) -> Biomedical(owen)\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Hack(x, owen))\nforall x (Somersault(x, morty) -> Squeeze(x, morty))\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Hack(x, owen))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, seymour) -> Defensive(x))\nSomersault(owen, seymour) -> Squeeze(owen, janna)\nforall x (Hack(x, janna) and Somersault(x, morty) -> Hack(morty, janna))\nforall x (Biomedical(x) -> Hack(x, janna))\n\nnot Hack(owen, morty)\n\nnot Hack(owen, morty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The odysseus overpay the nicoli. The odysseus disapprove the nedi. The nicoli overpay the odysseus. The nicoli overpay the nedi. The nicoli overpay the town. The nedi overpay the odysseus. The nedi disapprove the town. The town is acold. The town is summative. The town disapprove the nedi. If the nicoli clam the nedi then the nicoli is catarrhal. If someone is flemish then they need the nicoli. If someone overpay the nedi then they eat the nedi. If someone is flemish then they need the nicoli. If someone clam the odysseus then they are flemish. If the nicoli overpay the odysseus then the nicoli clam the town. If someone disapprove the town and they chase the nedi then the nedi disapprove the town. If someone is catarrhal then they need the town. The odysseus clam the odysseus.", "logic": "\nOverpay(odysseus, nicoli)\nDisapprove(odysseus, nedi)\nOverpay(nicoli, odysseus)\nOverpay(nicoli, nedi)\nOverpay(nicoli, town)\nOverpay(nedi, odysseus)\nDisapprove(nedi, town)\nAcold(town)\nSummative(town)\nDisapprove(town, nedi)\nClam(nicoli, nedi) -> Catarrhal(nicoli)\nforall x (Flemish(x) -> Disapprove(x, nicoli))\nforall x (Overpay(x, nedi) -> Clam(x, nedi))\nforall x (Flemish(x) -> Disapprove(x, nicoli))\nforall x (Clam(x, odysseus) -> Flemish(x))\nOverpay(nicoli, odysseus) -> Clam(nicoli, town)\nforall x (Disapprove(x, town) and Overpay(x, nedi) -> Disapprove(nedi, town))\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) -> Disapprove(x, town))\n\nClam(odysseus, odysseus)\n\nClam(odysseus, odysseus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The brigit ensnarl the carline. The brigit lighter the inigo. The carline ensnarl the brigit. The carline ensnarl the inigo. The carline ensnarl the donelle. The inigo ensnarl the brigit. The inigo lighter the donelle. The donelle is potable. The donelle is cardboard. The donelle lighter the inigo. If the carline prance the inigo then the carline is preceding. If someone is surficial then they need the carline. If someone ensnarl the inigo then they eat the inigo. If someone is surficial then they need the carline. If someone prance the brigit then they are surficial. If the carline ensnarl the brigit then the carline prance the donelle. If someone lighter the donelle and they chase the inigo then the inigo lighter the donelle. If someone is preceding then they need the donelle. The inigo does not eat the donelle.", "logic": "\nEnsnarl(brigit, carline)\nLighter(brigit, inigo)\nEnsnarl(carline, brigit)\nEnsnarl(carline, inigo)\nEnsnarl(carline, donelle)\nEnsnarl(inigo, brigit)\nLighter(inigo, donelle)\nPotable(donelle)\nCardboard(donelle)\nLighter(donelle, inigo)\nPrance(carline, inigo) -> Preceding(carline)\nforall x (Surficial(x) -> Lighter(x, carline))\nforall x (Ensnarl(x, inigo) -> Prance(x, inigo))\nforall x (Surficial(x) -> Lighter(x, carline))\nforall x (Prance(x, brigit) -> Surficial(x))\nEnsnarl(carline, brigit) -> Prance(carline, donelle)\nforall x (Lighter(x, donelle) and Ensnarl(x, inigo) -> Lighter(inigo, donelle))\nforall x (Preceding(x) -> Lighter(x, donelle))\n\nnot Prance(inigo, donelle)\n\nnot Prance(inigo, donelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "The karrah lucubrate the winnie. The karrah reassert the gwenny. The winnie lucubrate the karrah. The winnie lucubrate the gwenny. The winnie lucubrate the roderich. The gwenny lucubrate the karrah. The gwenny reassert the roderich. The roderich is buxom. The roderich is matey. The roderich reassert the gwenny. If the winnie feminise the gwenny then the winnie is heartsick. If someone is uneconomic then they need the winnie. If someone lucubrate the gwenny then they eat the gwenny. If someone is uneconomic then they need the winnie. If someone feminise the karrah then they are uneconomic. If the winnie lucubrate the karrah then the winnie feminise the roderich. If someone reassert the roderich and they chase the gwenny then the gwenny reassert the roderich. If someone is heartsick then they need the roderich. The roderich feminise the roderich.", "logic": "\nLucubrate(karrah, winnie)\nReassert(karrah, gwenny)\nLucubrate(winnie, karrah)\nLucubrate(winnie, gwenny)\nLucubrate(winnie, roderich)\nLucubrate(gwenny, karrah)\nReassert(gwenny, roderich)\nBuxom(roderich)\nMatey(roderich)\nReassert(roderich, gwenny)\nFeminise(winnie, gwenny) -> Heartsick(winnie)\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) -> Reassert(x, winnie))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, gwenny) -> Feminise(x, gwenny))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) -> Reassert(x, winnie))\nforall x (Feminise(x, karrah) -> Uneconomic(x))\nLucubrate(winnie, karrah) -> Feminise(winnie, roderich)\nforall x (Reassert(x, roderich) and Lucubrate(x, gwenny) -> Reassert(gwenny, roderich))\nforall x (Heartsick(x) -> Reassert(x, roderich))\n\nFeminise(roderich, roderich)\n\nFeminise(roderich, roderich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Amery is biased. Pepito is chaotic. Clancy is threefold. Imogen is abject. If someone is globular and chaotic then they are practised. Rough, biased people are lacklustre. All lacklustre people are globular. All biased people are lacklustre. If someone is chaotic then they are lacklustre. All lacklustre people are globular. Amery is biased.", "logic": "\nBiased(amery)\nChaotic(pepito)\nThreefold(clancy)\nAbject(imogen)\nforall x (Globular(x) and Chaotic(x) -> Practised(x))\nforall x (Globular(x) and Biased(x) -> Lacklustre(x))\nforall x (Lacklustre(x) -> Globular(x))\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Lacklustre(x))\nforall x (Chaotic(x) -> Lacklustre(x))\nforall x (Lacklustre(x) -> Globular(x))\n\nBiased(amery)\n\ntherefore Biased(amery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Bobette is unrigged. Haley is extinct. Daniel is squeamish. Cary is tracheal. If someone is hale and extinct then they are hidden. Rough, unrigged people are susurrant. All susurrant people are hale. All unrigged people are susurrant. If someone is extinct then they are susurrant. All susurrant people are hale. Cary is not tracheal.", "logic": "\nUnrigged(bobette)\nExtinct(haley)\nSqueamish(daniel)\nTracheal(cary)\nforall x (Hale(x) and Extinct(x) -> Hidden(x))\nforall x (Hale(x) and Unrigged(x) -> Susurrant(x))\nforall x (Susurrant(x) -> Hale(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) -> Susurrant(x))\nforall x (Extinct(x) -> Susurrant(x))\nforall x (Susurrant(x) -> Hale(x))\n\nnot Tracheal(cary)\n\ntherefore Tracheal(cary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Kincaid is aramaic. Flora is banned. Terrence is chintzy. Bride is disruptive. If someone is welsh and banned then they are seraphic. Rough, aramaic people are semipublic. All semipublic people are welsh. All aramaic people are semipublic. If someone is banned then they are semipublic. All semipublic people are welsh. Kincaid is semipublic.", "logic": "\nAramaic(kincaid)\nBanned(flora)\nChintzy(terrence)\nDisruptive(bride)\nforall x (Welsh(x) and Banned(x) -> Seraphic(x))\nforall x (Welsh(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Semipublic(x))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) -> Welsh(x))\nforall x (Aramaic(x) -> Semipublic(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Semipublic(x))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) -> Welsh(x))\n\nSemipublic(kincaid)\n\nAramaic(kincaid) and forall x (Aramaic(x) -> Semipublic(x)) -> therefore Semipublic(kincaid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Simeon is voluptuous. Bridget is canicular. Ishmael is unrivaled. Toni is exorbitant. If someone is illiterate and canicular then they are chargeable. Rough, voluptuous people are continued. All continued people are illiterate. All voluptuous people are continued. If someone is canicular then they are continued. All continued people are illiterate. Simeon is not continued.", "logic": "\nVoluptuous(simeon)\nCanicular(bridget)\nUnrivaled(ishmael)\nExorbitant(toni)\nforall x (Illiterate(x) and Canicular(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Illiterate(x) and Voluptuous(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Continued(x) -> Illiterate(x))\nforall x (Voluptuous(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Canicular(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Continued(x) -> Illiterate(x))\n\nnot Continued(simeon)\n\nVoluptuous(simeon) and forall x (Voluptuous(x) -> Continued(x)) -> therefore Continued(simeon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Win is hunted. Danika is malefic. Arianne is refractile. Tymothy is tuneful. If someone is carefree and malefic then they are worthy. Rough, hunted people are homesick. All homesick people are carefree. All hunted people are homesick. If someone is malefic then they are homesick. All homesick people are carefree. Danika is carefree.", "logic": "\nHunted(win)\nMalefic(danika)\nRefractile(arianne)\nTuneful(tymothy)\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Malefic(x) -> Worthy(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Hunted(x) -> Homesick(x))\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Carefree(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Homesick(x))\nforall x (Malefic(x) -> Homesick(x))\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Carefree(x))\n\nCarefree(danika)\n\nMalefic(danika) and forall x (Malefic(x) -> Homesick(x)) -> therefore Homesick(danika) Homesick(danika) and forall x (Homesick(x) -> Carefree(x)) -> therefore Carefree(danika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Leandra is magic. Giovanna is obviating. Rachel is haggard. Moore is darned. If someone is paunchy and obviating then they are born. Rough, magic people are vain. All vain people are paunchy. All magic people are vain. If someone is obviating then they are vain. All vain people are paunchy. Leandra is not paunchy.", "logic": "\nMagic(leandra)\nObviating(giovanna)\nHaggard(rachel)\nDarned(moore)\nforall x (Paunchy(x) and Obviating(x) -> Born(x))\nforall x (Paunchy(x) and Magic(x) -> Vain(x))\nforall x (Vain(x) -> Paunchy(x))\nforall x (Magic(x) -> Vain(x))\nforall x (Obviating(x) -> Vain(x))\nforall x (Vain(x) -> Paunchy(x))\n\nnot Paunchy(leandra)\n\nMagic(leandra) and forall x (Magic(x) -> Vain(x)) -> therefore Vain(leandra) Vain(leandra) and forall x (Vain(x) -> Paunchy(x)) -> therefore Paunchy(leandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Randie is unimpeded. Duffie is canopied. Marissa is malay. Sharline is fraudulent. If someone is millennian and canopied then they are monstrous. Rough, unimpeded people are vulcanized. All vulcanized people are millennian. All unimpeded people are vulcanized. If someone is canopied then they are vulcanized. All vulcanized people are millennian. Duffie is monstrous.", "logic": "\nUnimpeded(randie)\nCanopied(duffie)\nMalay(marissa)\nFraudulent(sharline)\nforall x (Millennian(x) and Canopied(x) -> Monstrous(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) and Unimpeded(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Vulcanized(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Vulcanized(x) -> Millennian(x))\n\nMonstrous(duffie)\n\nCanopied(duffie) and forall x (Canopied(x) -> Vulcanized(x)) -> therefore Vulcanized(duffie) Vulcanized(duffie) and forall x (Vulcanized(x) -> Millennian(x)) -> therefore Millennian(duffie) Millennian(duffie) and Canopied(duffie) and forall x (Millennian(x) and Canopied(x) -> Monstrous(x)) -> therefore Monstrous(duffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Matthiew is gibelike. Romola is burbling. Blondell is unmovable. Carlin is lxxiv. If someone is superable and burbling then they are regional. Rough, gibelike people are ploughed. All ploughed people are superable. All gibelike people are ploughed. If someone is burbling then they are ploughed. All ploughed people are superable. Romola is not regional.", "logic": "\nGibelike(matthiew)\nBurbling(romola)\nUnmovable(blondell)\nLxxiv(carlin)\nforall x (Superable(x) and Burbling(x) -> Regional(x))\nforall x (Superable(x) and Gibelike(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Superable(x))\nforall x (Gibelike(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Burbling(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Superable(x))\n\nnot Regional(romola)\n\nBurbling(romola) and forall x (Burbling(x) -> Ploughed(x)) -> therefore Ploughed(romola) Ploughed(romola) and forall x (Ploughed(x) -> Superable(x)) -> therefore Superable(romola) Superable(romola) and Burbling(romola) and forall x (Superable(x) and Burbling(x) -> Regional(x)) -> therefore Regional(romola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Davida is stumpy. Mitzi is littoral. Jenifer is propertied. Shaylynn is depletable. If someone is demoniac and littoral then they are munificent. Rough, stumpy people are unrecorded. All unrecorded people are demoniac. All stumpy people are unrecorded. If someone is littoral then they are unrecorded. All unrecorded people are demoniac. Jenifer is not unrecorded.", "logic": "\nStumpy(davida)\nLittoral(mitzi)\nPropertied(jenifer)\nDepletable(shaylynn)\nforall x (Demoniac(x) and Littoral(x) -> Munificent(x))\nforall x (Demoniac(x) and Stumpy(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Demoniac(x))\nforall x (Stumpy(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Littoral(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Demoniac(x))\n\nnot Unrecorded(jenifer)\n\nforall x (Demoniac(x) and Stumpy(x) -> Unrecorded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Cammi is pestering. David is nutrient. Stuart is awry. Iona is vernal. If someone is decreased and nutrient then they are modular. Rough, pestering people are venose. All venose people are decreased. All pestering people are venose. If someone is nutrient then they are venose. All venose people are decreased. Iona is decreased.", "logic": "\nPestering(cammi)\nNutrient(david)\nAwry(stuart)\nVernal(iona)\nforall x (Decreased(x) and Nutrient(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Decreased(x) and Pestering(x) -> Venose(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Decreased(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) -> Venose(x))\nforall x (Nutrient(x) -> Venose(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Decreased(x))\n\nDecreased(iona)\n\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Decreased(x)) <- forall x (Decreased(x) and Pestering(x) -> Venose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Quentin is palmar. Ewan is cardboard. Kathlene is untaught. Jania is virginal. If someone is milkless and cardboard then they are misogynic. Rough, palmar people are resiny. All resiny people are milkless. All palmar people are resiny. If someone is cardboard then they are resiny. All resiny people are milkless. Kathlene is not misogynic.", "logic": "\nPalmar(quentin)\nCardboard(ewan)\nUntaught(kathlene)\nVirginal(jania)\nforall x (Milkless(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Misogynic(x))\nforall x (Milkless(x) and Palmar(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Milkless(x))\nforall x (Palmar(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Cardboard(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Milkless(x))\n\nnot Misogynic(kathlene)\n\nforall x (Milkless(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Misogynic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Gerhard is unweaned. Hetty is scowling. Aldric is nonkosher. Karlen is cataleptic. If someone is shivery and scowling then they are lively. Rough, unweaned people are cruddy. All cruddy people are shivery. All unweaned people are cruddy. If someone is scowling then they are cruddy. All cruddy people are shivery. Aldric is shivery.", "logic": "\nUnweaned(gerhard)\nScowling(hetty)\nNonkosher(aldric)\nCataleptic(karlen)\nforall x (Shivery(x) and Scowling(x) -> Lively(x))\nforall x (Shivery(x) and Unweaned(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Cruddy(x) -> Shivery(x))\nforall x (Unweaned(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nforall x (Cruddy(x) -> Shivery(x))\n\nShivery(aldric)\n\nforall x (Cruddy(x) -> Shivery(x)) <- forall x (Shivery(x) and Unweaned(x) -> Cruddy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Archibald is tenanted. Danna is cisalpine. Hymie is senecan. Linnea is wily. If someone is chronic and cisalpine then they are mortifying. Rough, tenanted people are biogenetic. All biogenetic people are chronic. All tenanted people are biogenetic. If someone is cisalpine then they are biogenetic. All biogenetic people are chronic. Linnea is not cisalpine.", "logic": "\nTenanted(archibald)\nCisalpine(danna)\nSenecan(hymie)\nWily(linnea)\nforall x (Chronic(x) and Cisalpine(x) -> Mortifying(x))\nforall x (Chronic(x) and Tenanted(x) -> Biogenetic(x))\nforall x (Biogenetic(x) -> Chronic(x))\nforall x (Tenanted(x) -> Biogenetic(x))\nforall x (Cisalpine(x) -> Biogenetic(x))\nforall x (Biogenetic(x) -> Chronic(x))\n\nnot Cisalpine(linnea)\n\nnot Cisalpine(linnea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Godwin is better. Lorine is rusted. Laurie is tangerine. Alden is amebic. If someone is footsore and rusted then they are unfrosted. Rough, better people are scheduled. All scheduled people are footsore. All better people are scheduled. If someone is rusted then they are scheduled. All scheduled people are footsore. Lorine is amebic.", "logic": "\nBetter(godwin)\nRusted(lorine)\nTangerine(laurie)\nAmebic(alden)\nforall x (Footsore(x) and Rusted(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Footsore(x) and Better(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Footsore(x))\nforall x (Better(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Rusted(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Footsore(x))\n\nAmebic(lorine)\n\nAmebic(lorine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Humbert is planktonic. Rahel is pectic. Robinia is unsatiated. Magna is remiss. If someone is nonverbal and pectic then they are sarawakian. Rough, planktonic people are tempering. All tempering people are nonverbal. All planktonic people are tempering. If someone is pectic then they are tempering. All tempering people are nonverbal. Robinia is not remiss.", "logic": "\nPlanktonic(humbert)\nPectic(rahel)\nUnsatiated(robinia)\nRemiss(magna)\nforall x (Nonverbal(x) and Pectic(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nforall x (Nonverbal(x) and Planktonic(x) -> Tempering(x))\nforall x (Tempering(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Planktonic(x) -> Tempering(x))\nforall x (Pectic(x) -> Tempering(x))\nforall x (Tempering(x) -> Nonverbal(x))\n\nnot Remiss(robinia)\n\nnot Remiss(robinia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Emerson is swank. Cletus is uneatable. Hollis is systematic. Neel is choric. If someone is raptorial and uneatable then they are delineate. Rough, swank people are wheezy. All wheezy people are raptorial. All swank people are wheezy. If someone is uneatable then they are wheezy. All wheezy people are raptorial. Neel is systematic.", "logic": "\nSwank(emerson)\nUneatable(cletus)\nSystematic(hollis)\nChoric(neel)\nforall x (Raptorial(x) and Uneatable(x) -> Delineate(x))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) and Swank(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Swank(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Uneatable(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Raptorial(x))\n\nSystematic(neel)\n\nSystematic(neel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-2"} {"premises": "Daile is snobby. Candi is slapstick. David is not slapstick. If David is not slapstick then David is ferny. If something is oncologic and not snobby then it is gabby. If something is gabby and slapstick then it is ravaging. If something is invincible then it is ravaging. If Daile is ravaging then Daile is ferny. Kind things are invincible. Daile is snobby.", "logic": "\nSnobby(daile)\nSlapstick(candi)\nnot Slapstick(david)\nnot Slapstick(david) -> Ferny(david)\nforall x (Oncologic(x) and not Snobby(x) -> Gabby(x))\nforall x (Gabby(x) and Slapstick(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Invincible(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nRavaging(daile) -> Ferny(daile)\nforall x (Ferny(x) -> Invincible(x))\n\nSnobby(daile)\n\ntherefore Snobby(daile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Dayna is besieged. Davina is punctual. Raye is not punctual. If Raye is not punctual then Raye is demode. If something is burnished and not besieged then it is composed. If something is composed and punctual then it is tactical. If something is sedgy then it is tactical. If Dayna is tactical then Dayna is demode. Kind things are sedgy. Raye is punctual.", "logic": "\nBesieged(dayna)\nPunctual(davina)\nnot Punctual(raye)\nnot Punctual(raye) -> Demode(raye)\nforall x (Burnished(x) and not Besieged(x) -> Composed(x))\nforall x (Composed(x) and Punctual(x) -> Tactical(x))\nforall x (Sedgy(x) -> Tactical(x))\nTactical(dayna) -> Demode(dayna)\nforall x (Demode(x) -> Sedgy(x))\n\nPunctual(raye)\n\ntherefore not Punctual(raye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Neely is sanguinary. Calvin is prakritic. Britta is not prakritic. If Britta is not prakritic then Britta is nauseating. If something is webbed and not sanguinary then it is tart. If something is tart and prakritic then it is coagulate. If something is cagy then it is coagulate. If Neely is coagulate then Neely is nauseating. Kind things are cagy. Britta is nauseating.", "logic": "\nSanguinary(neely)\nPrakritic(calvin)\nnot Prakritic(britta)\nnot Prakritic(britta) -> Nauseating(britta)\nforall x (Webbed(x) and not Sanguinary(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Tart(x) and Prakritic(x) -> Coagulate(x))\nforall x (Cagy(x) -> Coagulate(x))\nCoagulate(neely) -> Nauseating(neely)\nforall x (Nauseating(x) -> Cagy(x))\n\nNauseating(britta)\n\nnot Prakritic(britta) and not Prakritic(britta) -> Nauseating(britta) -> therefore Nauseating(britta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Cecily is unobvious. Heinz is wartlike. Jasmine is not wartlike. If Jasmine is not wartlike then Jasmine is distinct. If something is quaternary and not unobvious then it is eutrophic. If something is eutrophic and wartlike then it is beholden. If something is practised then it is beholden. If Cecily is beholden then Cecily is distinct. Kind things are practised. Jasmine is not distinct.", "logic": "\nUnobvious(cecily)\nWartlike(heinz)\nnot Wartlike(jasmine)\nnot Wartlike(jasmine) -> Distinct(jasmine)\nforall x (Quaternary(x) and not Unobvious(x) -> Eutrophic(x))\nforall x (Eutrophic(x) and Wartlike(x) -> Beholden(x))\nforall x (Practised(x) -> Beholden(x))\nBeholden(cecily) -> Distinct(cecily)\nforall x (Distinct(x) -> Practised(x))\n\nnot Distinct(jasmine)\n\nnot Wartlike(jasmine) and not Wartlike(jasmine) -> Distinct(jasmine) -> therefore Distinct(jasmine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Theressa is tingling. Jolynn is rimy. Sonni is not rimy. If Sonni is not rimy then Sonni is meshuga. If something is smoothened and not tingling then it is doubting. If something is doubting and rimy then it is sweetened. If something is rakish then it is sweetened. If Theressa is sweetened then Theressa is meshuga. Kind things are rakish. Sonni is rakish.", "logic": "\nTingling(theressa)\nRimy(jolynn)\nnot Rimy(sonni)\nnot Rimy(sonni) -> Meshuga(sonni)\nforall x (Smoothened(x) and not Tingling(x) -> Doubting(x))\nforall x (Doubting(x) and Rimy(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nforall x (Rakish(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nSweetened(theressa) -> Meshuga(theressa)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> Rakish(x))\n\nRakish(sonni)\n\nnot Rimy(sonni) and not Rimy(sonni) -> Meshuga(sonni) -> therefore Meshuga(sonni) Meshuga(sonni) and forall x (Meshuga(x) -> Rakish(x)) -> therefore Rakish(sonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Redmond is straw. Donal is pass. Emmett is not pass. If Emmett is not pass then Emmett is scurfy. If something is annoying and not straw then it is uniovulate. If something is uniovulate and pass then it is unglazed. If something is unimpeded then it is unglazed. If Redmond is unglazed then Redmond is scurfy. Kind things are unimpeded. Emmett is not unimpeded.", "logic": "\nStraw(redmond)\nPass(donal)\nnot Pass(emmett)\nnot Pass(emmett) -> Scurfy(emmett)\nforall x (Annoying(x) and not Straw(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) and Pass(x) -> Unglazed(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) -> Unglazed(x))\nUnglazed(redmond) -> Scurfy(redmond)\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\n\nnot Unimpeded(emmett)\n\nnot Pass(emmett) and not Pass(emmett) -> Scurfy(emmett) -> therefore Scurfy(emmett) Scurfy(emmett) and forall x (Scurfy(x) -> Unimpeded(x)) -> therefore Unimpeded(emmett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Aleecia is imprecise. Evvie is platelike. Alasdair is not platelike. If Alasdair is not platelike then Alasdair is opposing. If something is animate and not imprecise then it is remaining. If something is remaining and platelike then it is haggard. If something is asymptotic then it is haggard. If Aleecia is haggard then Aleecia is opposing. Kind things are asymptotic. Alasdair is haggard.", "logic": "\nImprecise(aleecia)\nPlatelike(evvie)\nnot Platelike(alasdair)\nnot Platelike(alasdair) -> Opposing(alasdair)\nforall x (Animate(x) and not Imprecise(x) -> Remaining(x))\nforall x (Remaining(x) and Platelike(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) -> Haggard(x))\nHaggard(aleecia) -> Opposing(aleecia)\nforall x (Opposing(x) -> Asymptotic(x))\n\nHaggard(alasdair)\n\nnot Platelike(alasdair) and not Platelike(alasdair) -> Opposing(alasdair) -> therefore Opposing(alasdair) Opposing(alasdair) and forall x (Opposing(x) -> Asymptotic(x)) -> therefore Asymptotic(alasdair) Asymptotic(alasdair) and forall x (Asymptotic(x) -> Haggard(x)) -> therefore Haggard(alasdair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Reese is forced. Ayn is bilingual. Olivia is not bilingual. If Olivia is not bilingual then Olivia is scrimy. If something is cubelike and not forced then it is fluky. If something is fluky and bilingual then it is astral. If something is scapular then it is astral. If Reese is astral then Reese is scrimy. Kind things are scapular. Olivia is not astral.", "logic": "\nForced(reese)\nBilingual(ayn)\nnot Bilingual(olivia)\nnot Bilingual(olivia) -> Scrimy(olivia)\nforall x (Cubelike(x) and not Forced(x) -> Fluky(x))\nforall x (Fluky(x) and Bilingual(x) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Scapular(x) -> Astral(x))\nAstral(reese) -> Scrimy(reese)\nforall x (Scrimy(x) -> Scapular(x))\n\nnot Astral(olivia)\n\nnot Bilingual(olivia) and not Bilingual(olivia) -> Scrimy(olivia) -> therefore Scrimy(olivia) Scrimy(olivia) and forall x (Scrimy(x) -> Scapular(x)) -> therefore Scapular(olivia) Scapular(olivia) and forall x (Scapular(x) -> Astral(x)) -> therefore Astral(olivia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Frederic is uncharged. Kipp is banner. Laurent is not banner. If Laurent is not banner then Laurent is annual. If something is prandial and not uncharged then it is murine. If something is murine and banner then it is fake. If something is considered then it is fake. If Frederic is fake then Frederic is annual. Kind things are considered. Kipp is not considered.", "logic": "\nUncharged(frederic)\nBanner(kipp)\nnot Banner(laurent)\nnot Banner(laurent) -> Annual(laurent)\nforall x (Prandial(x) and not Uncharged(x) -> Murine(x))\nforall x (Murine(x) and Banner(x) -> Fake(x))\nforall x (Considered(x) -> Fake(x))\nFake(frederic) -> Annual(frederic)\nforall x (Annual(x) -> Considered(x))\n\nnot Considered(kipp)\n\nforall x (Annual(x) -> Considered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Chrystel is arsenious. Dexter is laden. Dotty is not laden. If Dotty is not laden then Dotty is mormon. If something is trilingual and not arsenious then it is lacelike. If something is lacelike and laden then it is autumnal. If something is pinstriped then it is autumnal. If Chrystel is autumnal then Chrystel is mormon. Kind things are pinstriped. Chrystel is pinstriped.", "logic": "\nArsenious(chrystel)\nLaden(dexter)\nnot Laden(dotty)\nnot Laden(dotty) -> Mormon(dotty)\nforall x (Trilingual(x) and not Arsenious(x) -> Lacelike(x))\nforall x (Lacelike(x) and Laden(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nAutumnal(chrystel) -> Mormon(chrystel)\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Pinstriped(x))\n\nPinstriped(chrystel)\n\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Pinstriped(x)) <- Autumnal(chrystel) -> Mormon(chrystel) <- forall x (Lacelike(x) and Laden(x) -> Autumnal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Reginald is ursine. Welsh is tubby. Somerset is not tubby. If Somerset is not tubby then Somerset is virtuoso. If something is portentous and not ursine then it is vagrant. If something is vagrant and tubby then it is dendritic. If something is elfin then it is dendritic. If Reginald is dendritic then Reginald is virtuoso. Kind things are elfin. Reginald is not dendritic.", "logic": "\nUrsine(reginald)\nTubby(welsh)\nnot Tubby(somerset)\nnot Tubby(somerset) -> Virtuoso(somerset)\nforall x (Portentous(x) and not Ursine(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Vagrant(x) and Tubby(x) -> Dendritic(x))\nforall x (Elfin(x) -> Dendritic(x))\nDendritic(reginald) -> Virtuoso(reginald)\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Elfin(x))\n\nnot Dendritic(reginald)\n\nforall x (Elfin(x) -> Dendritic(x)) <- forall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Elfin(x)) <- Dendritic(reginald) -> Virtuoso(reginald) <- forall x (Vagrant(x) and Tubby(x) -> Dendritic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Mikael is woollen. Carita is unseamed. Sky is not unseamed. If Sky is not unseamed then Sky is mercerized. If something is affined and not woollen then it is inverse. If something is inverse and unseamed then it is phreatic. If something is palmate then it is phreatic. If Mikael is phreatic then Mikael is mercerized. Kind things are palmate. Carita is inverse.", "logic": "\nWoollen(mikael)\nUnseamed(carita)\nnot Unseamed(sky)\nnot Unseamed(sky) -> Mercerized(sky)\nforall x (Affined(x) and not Woollen(x) -> Inverse(x))\nforall x (Inverse(x) and Unseamed(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nPhreatic(mikael) -> Mercerized(mikael)\nforall x (Mercerized(x) -> Palmate(x))\n\nInverse(carita)\n\nforall x (Affined(x) and not Woollen(x) -> Inverse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Kally is afebrile. Hamnet is jungian. Arnie is not jungian. If Arnie is not jungian then Arnie is apiculate. If something is checked and not afebrile then it is enchanting. If something is enchanting and jungian then it is astounded. If something is economical then it is astounded. If Kally is astounded then Kally is apiculate. Kind things are economical. Hamnet is not checked.", "logic": "\nAfebrile(kally)\nJungian(hamnet)\nnot Jungian(arnie)\nnot Jungian(arnie) -> Apiculate(arnie)\nforall x (Checked(x) and not Afebrile(x) -> Enchanting(x))\nforall x (Enchanting(x) and Jungian(x) -> Astounded(x))\nforall x (Economical(x) -> Astounded(x))\nAstounded(kally) -> Apiculate(kally)\nforall x (Apiculate(x) -> Economical(x))\n\nnot Checked(hamnet)\n\nnot Checked(hamnet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Catharina is exoteric. Rayshell is incensed. Bobby is not incensed. If Bobby is not incensed then Bobby is fulgurant. If something is aliphatic and not exoteric then it is aneurismal. If something is aneurismal and incensed then it is vexed. If something is livery then it is vexed. If Catharina is vexed then Catharina is fulgurant. Kind things are livery. Bobby is aliphatic.", "logic": "\nExoteric(catharina)\nIncensed(rayshell)\nnot Incensed(bobby)\nnot Incensed(bobby) -> Fulgurant(bobby)\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) and not Exoteric(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) and Incensed(x) -> Vexed(x))\nforall x (Livery(x) -> Vexed(x))\nVexed(catharina) -> Fulgurant(catharina)\nforall x (Fulgurant(x) -> Livery(x))\n\nAliphatic(bobby)\n\nAliphatic(bobby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Nanny is inexpert. Tymon is rarefied. Gilbert is not rarefied. If Gilbert is not rarefied then Gilbert is equivocal. If something is sounding and not inexpert then it is uttered. If something is uttered and rarefied then it is xxxiii. If something is unimproved then it is xxxiii. If Nanny is xxxiii then Nanny is equivocal. Kind things are unimproved. Gilbert is not inexpert.", "logic": "\nInexpert(nanny)\nRarefied(tymon)\nnot Rarefied(gilbert)\nnot Rarefied(gilbert) -> Equivocal(gilbert)\nforall x (Sounding(x) and not Inexpert(x) -> Uttered(x))\nforall x (Uttered(x) and Rarefied(x) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Unimproved(x) -> Xxxiii(x))\nXxxiii(nanny) -> Equivocal(nanny)\nforall x (Equivocal(x) -> Unimproved(x))\n\nnot Inexpert(gilbert)\n\nnot Inexpert(gilbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Celina is speaking. Kermie is inwrought. Flossy is not inwrought. If Flossy is not inwrought then Flossy is fucking. If something is warring and not speaking then it is sweltry. If something is sweltry and inwrought then it is blasting. If something is ictic then it is blasting. If Celina is blasting then Celina is fucking. Kind things are ictic. Kermie is speaking.", "logic": "\nSpeaking(celina)\nInwrought(kermie)\nnot Inwrought(flossy)\nnot Inwrought(flossy) -> Fucking(flossy)\nforall x (Warring(x) and not Speaking(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Inwrought(x) -> Blasting(x))\nforall x (Ictic(x) -> Blasting(x))\nBlasting(celina) -> Fucking(celina)\nforall x (Fucking(x) -> Ictic(x))\n\nSpeaking(kermie)\n\nSpeaking(kermie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "The stanley is actable. The stanley hull the roddy. The stanley immunise the bella. The barnard hull the bella. The bella ameliorate the stanley. The bella immunise the stanley. The roddy ameliorate the barnard. If someone immunise the bella then the bella ameliorate the roddy. If the stanley is unshod and the stanley does not need the roddy then the stanley immunise the barnard. If someone ameliorate the roddy then the roddy immunise the stanley. If someone ameliorate the stanley and the stanley is hardback then the stanley does not see the roddy. If someone hull the roddy then the roddy immunise the barnard. If someone immunise the barnard and they see the stanley then the barnard immunise the stanley. If the roddy ameliorate the barnard then the roddy hull the stanley. If someone ameliorate the roddy and the roddy hull the stanley then the stanley is not iffy. The stanley immunise the bella.", "logic": "\nActable(stanley)\nHull(stanley, roddy)\nImmunise(stanley, bella)\nHull(barnard, bella)\nAmeliorate(bella, stanley)\nImmunise(bella, stanley)\nAmeliorate(roddy, barnard)\nforall x (Immunise(x, bella) -> Ameliorate(bella, roddy))\nUnshod(stanley) and not Hull(stanley, roddy) -> Immunise(stanley, barnard)\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, roddy) -> Immunise(roddy, stanley))\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, stanley) and Hardback(stanley) -> not Immunise(stanley, roddy))\nforall x (Hull(x, roddy) -> Immunise(roddy, barnard))\nforall x (Immunise(x, barnard) and Immunise(x, stanley) -> Immunise(barnard, stanley))\nAmeliorate(roddy, barnard) -> Hull(roddy, stanley)\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, roddy) and Hull(roddy, stanley) -> not Iffy(stanley))\n\nImmunise(stanley, bella)\n\ntherefore Immunise(stanley, bella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The edgardo is laminar. The edgardo unsay the duffy. The edgardo unite the saul. The tanny unsay the saul. The saul bedew the edgardo. The saul unite the edgardo. The duffy bedew the tanny. If someone unite the saul then the saul bedew the duffy. If the edgardo is heavyset and the edgardo does not need the duffy then the edgardo unite the tanny. If someone bedew the duffy then the duffy unite the edgardo. If someone bedew the edgardo and the edgardo is aphoristic then the edgardo does not see the duffy. If someone unsay the duffy then the duffy unite the tanny. If someone unite the tanny and they see the edgardo then the tanny unite the edgardo. If the duffy bedew the tanny then the duffy unsay the edgardo. If someone bedew the duffy and the duffy unsay the edgardo then the edgardo is not blotched. The edgardo does not see the saul.", "logic": "\nLaminar(edgardo)\nUnsay(edgardo, duffy)\nUnite(edgardo, saul)\nUnsay(tanny, saul)\nBedew(saul, edgardo)\nUnite(saul, edgardo)\nBedew(duffy, tanny)\nforall x (Unite(x, saul) -> Bedew(saul, duffy))\nHeavyset(edgardo) and not Unsay(edgardo, duffy) -> Unite(edgardo, tanny)\nforall x (Bedew(x, duffy) -> Unite(duffy, edgardo))\nforall x (Bedew(x, edgardo) and Aphoristic(edgardo) -> not Unite(edgardo, duffy))\nforall x (Unsay(x, duffy) -> Unite(duffy, tanny))\nforall x (Unite(x, tanny) and Unite(x, edgardo) -> Unite(tanny, edgardo))\nBedew(duffy, tanny) -> Unsay(duffy, edgardo)\nforall x (Bedew(x, duffy) and Unsay(duffy, edgardo) -> not Blotched(edgardo))\n\nnot Unite(edgardo, saul)\n\ntherefore Unite(edgardo, saul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The douglis is spermatic. The douglis tether the paulina. The douglis abscise the holley. The orel tether the holley. The holley recast the douglis. The holley abscise the douglis. The paulina recast the orel. If someone abscise the holley then the holley recast the paulina. If the douglis is impugnable and the douglis does not need the paulina then the douglis abscise the orel. If someone recast the paulina then the paulina abscise the douglis. If someone recast the douglis and the douglis is similar then the douglis does not see the paulina. If someone tether the paulina then the paulina abscise the orel. If someone abscise the orel and they see the douglis then the orel abscise the douglis. If the paulina recast the orel then the paulina tether the douglis. If someone recast the paulina and the paulina tether the douglis then the douglis is not bladdery. The paulina tether the douglis.", "logic": "\nSpermatic(douglis)\nTether(douglis, paulina)\nAbscise(douglis, holley)\nTether(orel, holley)\nRecast(holley, douglis)\nAbscise(holley, douglis)\nRecast(paulina, orel)\nforall x (Abscise(x, holley) -> Recast(holley, paulina))\nImpugnable(douglis) and not Tether(douglis, paulina) -> Abscise(douglis, orel)\nforall x (Recast(x, paulina) -> Abscise(paulina, douglis))\nforall x (Recast(x, douglis) and Similar(douglis) -> not Abscise(douglis, paulina))\nforall x (Tether(x, paulina) -> Abscise(paulina, orel))\nforall x (Abscise(x, orel) and Abscise(x, douglis) -> Abscise(orel, douglis))\nRecast(paulina, orel) -> Tether(paulina, douglis)\nforall x (Recast(x, paulina) and Tether(paulina, douglis) -> not Bladdery(douglis))\n\nTether(paulina, douglis)\n\nRecast(paulina, orel) and Recast(paulina, orel) -> Tether(paulina, douglis) -> therefore Tether(paulina, douglis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The devina is conceptive. The devina burthen the marisa. The devina sully the moe. The larry burthen the moe. The moe field the devina. The moe sully the devina. The marisa field the larry. If someone sully the moe then the moe field the marisa. If the devina is unmingled and the devina does not need the marisa then the devina sully the larry. If someone field the marisa then the marisa sully the devina. If someone field the devina and the devina is busty then the devina does not see the marisa. If someone burthen the marisa then the marisa sully the larry. If someone sully the larry and they see the devina then the larry sully the devina. If the marisa field the larry then the marisa burthen the devina. If someone field the marisa and the marisa burthen the devina then the devina is not wilted. The moe does not like the marisa.", "logic": "\nConceptive(devina)\nBurthen(devina, marisa)\nSully(devina, moe)\nBurthen(larry, moe)\nField(moe, devina)\nSully(moe, devina)\nField(marisa, larry)\nforall x (Sully(x, moe) -> Field(moe, marisa))\nUnmingled(devina) and not Burthen(devina, marisa) -> Sully(devina, larry)\nforall x (Field(x, marisa) -> Sully(marisa, devina))\nforall x (Field(x, devina) and Busty(devina) -> not Sully(devina, marisa))\nforall x (Burthen(x, marisa) -> Sully(marisa, larry))\nforall x (Sully(x, larry) and Sully(x, devina) -> Sully(larry, devina))\nField(marisa, larry) -> Burthen(marisa, devina)\nforall x (Field(x, marisa) and Burthen(marisa, devina) -> not Wilted(devina))\n\nnot Field(moe, marisa)\n\nSully(devina, moe) and forall x (Sully(x, moe) -> Field(moe, marisa)) -> therefore Field(moe, marisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The elberta is unobvious. The elberta enact the michaela. The elberta optimise the tisha. The deana enact the tisha. The tisha crepitate the elberta. The tisha optimise the elberta. The michaela crepitate the deana. If someone optimise the tisha then the tisha crepitate the michaela. If the elberta is freelance and the elberta does not need the michaela then the elberta optimise the deana. If someone crepitate the michaela then the michaela optimise the elberta. If someone crepitate the elberta and the elberta is gooselike then the elberta does not see the michaela. If someone enact the michaela then the michaela optimise the deana. If someone optimise the deana and they see the elberta then the deana optimise the elberta. If the michaela crepitate the deana then the michaela enact the elberta. If someone crepitate the michaela and the michaela enact the elberta then the elberta is not remindful. The michaela optimise the elberta.", "logic": "\nUnobvious(elberta)\nEnact(elberta, michaela)\nOptimise(elberta, tisha)\nEnact(deana, tisha)\nCrepitate(tisha, elberta)\nOptimise(tisha, elberta)\nCrepitate(michaela, deana)\nforall x (Optimise(x, tisha) -> Crepitate(tisha, michaela))\nFreelance(elberta) and not Enact(elberta, michaela) -> Optimise(elberta, deana)\nforall x (Crepitate(x, michaela) -> Optimise(michaela, elberta))\nforall x (Crepitate(x, elberta) and Gooselike(elberta) -> not Optimise(elberta, michaela))\nforall x (Enact(x, michaela) -> Optimise(michaela, deana))\nforall x (Optimise(x, deana) and Optimise(x, elberta) -> Optimise(deana, elberta))\nCrepitate(michaela, deana) -> Enact(michaela, elberta)\nforall x (Crepitate(x, michaela) and Enact(michaela, elberta) -> not Remindful(elberta))\n\nOptimise(michaela, elberta)\n\nOptimise(elberta, tisha) and forall x (Optimise(x, tisha) -> Crepitate(tisha, michaela)) -> therefore Crepitate(tisha, michaela) Crepitate(tisha, michaela) and forall x (Crepitate(x, michaela) -> Optimise(michaela, elberta)) -> therefore Optimise(michaela, elberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The sosanna is english. The sosanna puree the matthiew. The sosanna disesteem the tristan. The eba puree the tristan. The tristan spread the sosanna. The tristan disesteem the sosanna. The matthiew spread the eba. If someone disesteem the tristan then the tristan spread the matthiew. If the sosanna is sprouted and the sosanna does not need the matthiew then the sosanna disesteem the eba. If someone spread the matthiew then the matthiew disesteem the sosanna. If someone spread the sosanna and the sosanna is strong then the sosanna does not see the matthiew. If someone puree the matthiew then the matthiew disesteem the eba. If someone disesteem the eba and they see the sosanna then the eba disesteem the sosanna. If the matthiew spread the eba then the matthiew puree the sosanna. If someone spread the matthiew and the matthiew puree the sosanna then the sosanna is not fragmented. The sosanna is fragmented.", "logic": "\nEnglish(sosanna)\nPuree(sosanna, matthiew)\nDisesteem(sosanna, tristan)\nPuree(eba, tristan)\nSpread(tristan, sosanna)\nDisesteem(tristan, sosanna)\nSpread(matthiew, eba)\nforall x (Disesteem(x, tristan) -> Spread(tristan, matthiew))\nSprouted(sosanna) and not Puree(sosanna, matthiew) -> Disesteem(sosanna, eba)\nforall x (Spread(x, matthiew) -> Disesteem(matthiew, sosanna))\nforall x (Spread(x, sosanna) and Strong(sosanna) -> not Disesteem(sosanna, matthiew))\nforall x (Puree(x, matthiew) -> Disesteem(matthiew, eba))\nforall x (Disesteem(x, eba) and Disesteem(x, sosanna) -> Disesteem(eba, sosanna))\nSpread(matthiew, eba) -> Puree(matthiew, sosanna)\nforall x (Spread(x, matthiew) and Puree(matthiew, sosanna) -> not Fragmented(sosanna))\n\nFragmented(sosanna)\n\nDisesteem(sosanna, tristan) and forall x (Disesteem(x, tristan) -> Spread(tristan, matthiew)) -> therefore Spread(tristan, matthiew) Spread(matthiew, eba) and Spread(matthiew, eba) -> Puree(matthiew, sosanna) -> therefore Puree(matthiew, sosanna) Spread(tristan, matthiew) and Puree(matthiew, sosanna) and forall x (Spread(x, matthiew) and Puree(matthiew, sosanna) -> not Fragmented(sosanna)) -> therefore not Fragmented(sosanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The catherin is foliated. The catherin entomb the cherin. The catherin action the orelle. The zacharia entomb the orelle. The orelle unmuzzle the catherin. The orelle action the catherin. The cherin unmuzzle the zacharia. If someone action the orelle then the orelle unmuzzle the cherin. If the catherin is halal and the catherin does not need the cherin then the catherin action the zacharia. If someone unmuzzle the cherin then the cherin action the catherin. If someone unmuzzle the catherin and the catherin is curricular then the catherin does not see the cherin. If someone entomb the cherin then the cherin action the zacharia. If someone action the zacharia and they see the catherin then the zacharia action the catherin. If the cherin unmuzzle the zacharia then the cherin entomb the catherin. If someone unmuzzle the cherin and the cherin entomb the catherin then the catherin is not torn. The zacharia action the catherin.", "logic": "\nFoliated(catherin)\nEntomb(catherin, cherin)\nAction(catherin, orelle)\nEntomb(zacharia, orelle)\nUnmuzzle(orelle, catherin)\nAction(orelle, catherin)\nUnmuzzle(cherin, zacharia)\nforall x (Action(x, orelle) -> Unmuzzle(orelle, cherin))\nHalal(catherin) and not Entomb(catherin, cherin) -> Action(catherin, zacharia)\nforall x (Unmuzzle(x, cherin) -> Action(cherin, catherin))\nforall x (Unmuzzle(x, catherin) and Curricular(catherin) -> not Action(catherin, cherin))\nforall x (Entomb(x, cherin) -> Action(cherin, zacharia))\nforall x (Action(x, zacharia) and Action(x, catherin) -> Action(zacharia, catherin))\nUnmuzzle(cherin, zacharia) -> Entomb(cherin, catherin)\nforall x (Unmuzzle(x, cherin) and Entomb(cherin, catherin) -> not Torn(catherin))\n\nAction(zacharia, catherin)\n\nEntomb(catherin, cherin) and forall x (Entomb(x, cherin) -> Action(cherin, zacharia)) -> therefore Action(cherin, zacharia) Action(catherin, orelle) and forall x (Action(x, orelle) -> Unmuzzle(orelle, cherin)) -> therefore Unmuzzle(orelle, cherin) Unmuzzle(orelle, cherin) and forall x (Unmuzzle(x, cherin) -> Action(cherin, catherin)) -> therefore Action(cherin, catherin) Action(cherin, zacharia) and Action(cherin, catherin) and forall x (Action(x, zacharia) and Action(x, catherin) -> Action(zacharia, catherin)) -> therefore Action(zacharia, catherin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The datha is honorary. The datha vowelise the krissy. The datha bleat the nathan. The virge vowelise the nathan. The nathan stress the datha. The nathan bleat the datha. The krissy stress the virge. If someone bleat the nathan then the nathan stress the krissy. If the datha is nonionic and the datha does not need the krissy then the datha bleat the virge. If someone stress the krissy then the krissy bleat the datha. If someone stress the datha and the datha is palmate then the datha does not see the krissy. If someone vowelise the krissy then the krissy bleat the virge. If someone bleat the virge and they see the datha then the virge bleat the datha. If the krissy stress the virge then the krissy vowelise the datha. If someone stress the krissy and the krissy vowelise the datha then the datha is not contextual. The virge does not see the datha.", "logic": "\nHonorary(datha)\nVowelise(datha, krissy)\nBleat(datha, nathan)\nVowelise(virge, nathan)\nStress(nathan, datha)\nBleat(nathan, datha)\nStress(krissy, virge)\nforall x (Bleat(x, nathan) -> Stress(nathan, krissy))\nNonionic(datha) and not Vowelise(datha, krissy) -> Bleat(datha, virge)\nforall x (Stress(x, krissy) -> Bleat(krissy, datha))\nforall x (Stress(x, datha) and Palmate(datha) -> not Bleat(datha, krissy))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, krissy) -> Bleat(krissy, virge))\nforall x (Bleat(x, virge) and Bleat(x, datha) -> Bleat(virge, datha))\nStress(krissy, virge) -> Vowelise(krissy, datha)\nforall x (Stress(x, krissy) and Vowelise(krissy, datha) -> not Contextual(datha))\n\nnot Bleat(virge, datha)\n\nVowelise(datha, krissy) and forall x (Vowelise(x, krissy) -> Bleat(krissy, virge)) -> therefore Bleat(krissy, virge) Bleat(datha, nathan) and forall x (Bleat(x, nathan) -> Stress(nathan, krissy)) -> therefore Stress(nathan, krissy) Stress(nathan, krissy) and forall x (Stress(x, krissy) -> Bleat(krissy, datha)) -> therefore Bleat(krissy, datha) Bleat(krissy, virge) and Bleat(krissy, datha) and forall x (Bleat(x, virge) and Bleat(x, datha) -> Bleat(virge, datha)) -> therefore Bleat(virge, datha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The iain is scurfy. The iain syllabise the gilly. The iain augur the jimmie. The brigitte syllabise the jimmie. The jimmie catch the iain. The jimmie augur the iain. The gilly catch the brigitte. If someone augur the jimmie then the jimmie catch the gilly. If the iain is blabby and the iain does not need the gilly then the iain augur the brigitte. If someone catch the gilly then the gilly augur the iain. If someone catch the iain and the iain is lowest then the iain does not see the gilly. If someone syllabise the gilly then the gilly augur the brigitte. If someone augur the brigitte and they see the iain then the brigitte augur the iain. If the gilly catch the brigitte then the gilly syllabise the iain. If someone catch the gilly and the gilly syllabise the iain then the iain is not nude. The iain does not see the brigitte.", "logic": "\nScurfy(iain)\nSyllabise(iain, gilly)\nAugur(iain, jimmie)\nSyllabise(brigitte, jimmie)\nCatch(jimmie, iain)\nAugur(jimmie, iain)\nCatch(gilly, brigitte)\nforall x (Augur(x, jimmie) -> Catch(jimmie, gilly))\nBlabby(iain) and not Syllabise(iain, gilly) -> Augur(iain, brigitte)\nforall x (Catch(x, gilly) -> Augur(gilly, iain))\nforall x (Catch(x, iain) and Lowest(iain) -> not Augur(iain, gilly))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, gilly) -> Augur(gilly, brigitte))\nforall x (Augur(x, brigitte) and Augur(x, iain) -> Augur(brigitte, iain))\nCatch(gilly, brigitte) -> Syllabise(gilly, iain)\nforall x (Catch(x, gilly) and Syllabise(gilly, iain) -> not Nude(iain))\n\nnot Augur(iain, brigitte)\n\nBlabby(iain) and not Syllabise(iain, gilly) -> Augur(iain, brigitte) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The walt is welcoming. The walt occlude the krysta. The walt repeat the thomasine. The kellen occlude the thomasine. The thomasine eternalise the walt. The thomasine repeat the walt. The krysta eternalise the kellen. If someone repeat the thomasine then the thomasine eternalise the krysta. If the walt is unrivalled and the walt does not need the krysta then the walt repeat the kellen. If someone eternalise the krysta then the krysta repeat the walt. If someone eternalise the walt and the walt is bigmouthed then the walt does not see the krysta. If someone occlude the krysta then the krysta repeat the kellen. If someone repeat the kellen and they see the walt then the kellen repeat the walt. If the krysta eternalise the kellen then the krysta occlude the walt. If someone eternalise the krysta and the krysta occlude the walt then the walt is not oscine. The walt occlude the thomasine.", "logic": "\nWelcoming(walt)\nOcclude(walt, krysta)\nRepeat(walt, thomasine)\nOcclude(kellen, thomasine)\nEternalise(thomasine, walt)\nRepeat(thomasine, walt)\nEternalise(krysta, kellen)\nforall x (Repeat(x, thomasine) -> Eternalise(thomasine, krysta))\nUnrivalled(walt) and not Occlude(walt, krysta) -> Repeat(walt, kellen)\nforall x (Eternalise(x, krysta) -> Repeat(krysta, walt))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, walt) and Bigmouthed(walt) -> not Repeat(walt, krysta))\nforall x (Occlude(x, krysta) -> Repeat(krysta, kellen))\nforall x (Repeat(x, kellen) and Repeat(x, walt) -> Repeat(kellen, walt))\nEternalise(krysta, kellen) -> Occlude(krysta, walt)\nforall x (Eternalise(x, krysta) and Occlude(krysta, walt) -> not Oscine(walt))\n\nOcclude(walt, thomasine)\n\nOcclude(walt, thomasine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The dayle is febrile. The dayle donate the evaleen. The dayle feast the modesta. The anette donate the modesta. The modesta shnorr the dayle. The modesta feast the dayle. The evaleen shnorr the anette. If someone feast the modesta then the modesta shnorr the evaleen. If the dayle is blueish and the dayle does not need the evaleen then the dayle feast the anette. If someone shnorr the evaleen then the evaleen feast the dayle. If someone shnorr the dayle and the dayle is ulnar then the dayle does not see the evaleen. If someone donate the evaleen then the evaleen feast the anette. If someone feast the anette and they see the dayle then the anette feast the dayle. If the evaleen shnorr the anette then the evaleen donate the dayle. If someone shnorr the evaleen and the evaleen donate the dayle then the dayle is not wilted. The anette does not like the anette.", "logic": "\nFebrile(dayle)\nDonate(dayle, evaleen)\nFeast(dayle, modesta)\nDonate(anette, modesta)\nShnorr(modesta, dayle)\nFeast(modesta, dayle)\nShnorr(evaleen, anette)\nforall x (Feast(x, modesta) -> Shnorr(modesta, evaleen))\nBlueish(dayle) and not Donate(dayle, evaleen) -> Feast(dayle, anette)\nforall x (Shnorr(x, evaleen) -> Feast(evaleen, dayle))\nforall x (Shnorr(x, dayle) and Ulnar(dayle) -> not Feast(dayle, evaleen))\nforall x (Donate(x, evaleen) -> Feast(evaleen, anette))\nforall x (Feast(x, anette) and Feast(x, dayle) -> Feast(anette, dayle))\nShnorr(evaleen, anette) -> Donate(evaleen, dayle)\nforall x (Shnorr(x, evaleen) and Donate(evaleen, dayle) -> not Wilted(dayle))\n\nnot Shnorr(anette, anette)\n\nnot Shnorr(anette, anette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The irena is supreme. The irena exorcise the hillard. The irena scold the hilliary. The winny exorcise the hilliary. The hilliary quake the irena. The hilliary scold the irena. The hillard quake the winny. If someone scold the hilliary then the hilliary quake the hillard. If the irena is washable and the irena does not need the hillard then the irena scold the winny. If someone quake the hillard then the hillard scold the irena. If someone quake the irena and the irena is acarpous then the irena does not see the hillard. If someone exorcise the hillard then the hillard scold the winny. If someone scold the winny and they see the irena then the winny scold the irena. If the hillard quake the winny then the hillard exorcise the irena. If someone quake the hillard and the hillard exorcise the irena then the irena is not alternate. The hilliary quake the winny.", "logic": "\nSupreme(irena)\nExorcise(irena, hillard)\nScold(irena, hilliary)\nExorcise(winny, hilliary)\nQuake(hilliary, irena)\nScold(hilliary, irena)\nQuake(hillard, winny)\nforall x (Scold(x, hilliary) -> Quake(hilliary, hillard))\nWashable(irena) and not Exorcise(irena, hillard) -> Scold(irena, winny)\nforall x (Quake(x, hillard) -> Scold(hillard, irena))\nforall x (Quake(x, irena) and Acarpous(irena) -> not Scold(irena, hillard))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, hillard) -> Scold(hillard, winny))\nforall x (Scold(x, winny) and Scold(x, irena) -> Scold(winny, irena))\nQuake(hillard, winny) -> Exorcise(hillard, irena)\nforall x (Quake(x, hillard) and Exorcise(hillard, irena) -> not Alternate(irena))\n\nQuake(hilliary, winny)\n\nQuake(hilliary, winny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The susi is geocentric. The susi respite the jenette. The susi sober the lilah. The brant respite the lilah. The lilah critique the susi. The lilah sober the susi. The jenette critique the brant. If someone sober the lilah then the lilah critique the jenette. If the susi is awesome and the susi does not need the jenette then the susi sober the brant. If someone critique the jenette then the jenette sober the susi. If someone critique the susi and the susi is causeless then the susi does not see the jenette. If someone respite the jenette then the jenette sober the brant. If someone sober the brant and they see the susi then the brant sober the susi. If the jenette critique the brant then the jenette respite the susi. If someone critique the jenette and the jenette respite the susi then the susi is not profitless. The brant does not need the jenette.", "logic": "\nGeocentric(susi)\nRespite(susi, jenette)\nSober(susi, lilah)\nRespite(brant, lilah)\nCritique(lilah, susi)\nSober(lilah, susi)\nCritique(jenette, brant)\nforall x (Sober(x, lilah) -> Critique(lilah, jenette))\nAwesome(susi) and not Respite(susi, jenette) -> Sober(susi, brant)\nforall x (Critique(x, jenette) -> Sober(jenette, susi))\nforall x (Critique(x, susi) and Causeless(susi) -> not Sober(susi, jenette))\nforall x (Respite(x, jenette) -> Sober(jenette, brant))\nforall x (Sober(x, brant) and Sober(x, susi) -> Sober(brant, susi))\nCritique(jenette, brant) -> Respite(jenette, susi)\nforall x (Critique(x, jenette) and Respite(jenette, susi) -> not Profitless(susi))\n\nnot Respite(brant, jenette)\n\nnot Respite(brant, jenette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The gertie is baboonish. The gertie aliment the anja. The gertie export the robina. The evania aliment the robina. The robina hold the gertie. The robina export the gertie. The anja hold the evania. If someone export the robina then the robina hold the anja. If the gertie is argentic and the gertie does not need the anja then the gertie export the evania. If someone hold the anja then the anja export the gertie. If someone hold the gertie and the gertie is unstinting then the gertie does not see the anja. If someone aliment the anja then the anja export the evania. If someone export the evania and they see the gertie then the evania export the gertie. If the anja hold the evania then the anja aliment the gertie. If someone hold the anja and the anja aliment the gertie then the gertie is not laputan. The anja aliment the evania.", "logic": "\nBaboonish(gertie)\nAliment(gertie, anja)\nExport(gertie, robina)\nAliment(evania, robina)\nHold(robina, gertie)\nExport(robina, gertie)\nHold(anja, evania)\nforall x (Export(x, robina) -> Hold(robina, anja))\nArgentic(gertie) and not Aliment(gertie, anja) -> Export(gertie, evania)\nforall x (Hold(x, anja) -> Export(anja, gertie))\nforall x (Hold(x, gertie) and Unstinting(gertie) -> not Export(gertie, anja))\nforall x (Aliment(x, anja) -> Export(anja, evania))\nforall x (Export(x, evania) and Export(x, gertie) -> Export(evania, gertie))\nHold(anja, evania) -> Aliment(anja, gertie)\nforall x (Hold(x, anja) and Aliment(anja, gertie) -> not Laputan(gertie))\n\nAliment(anja, evania)\n\nAliment(anja, evania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The lefty is aphetic. The lefty cocainise the ezechiel. The lefty manhandle the gratiana. The trevar cocainise the gratiana. The gratiana prospect the lefty. The gratiana manhandle the lefty. The ezechiel prospect the trevar. If someone manhandle the gratiana then the gratiana prospect the ezechiel. If the lefty is midmost and the lefty does not need the ezechiel then the lefty manhandle the trevar. If someone prospect the ezechiel then the ezechiel manhandle the lefty. If someone prospect the lefty and the lefty is ample then the lefty does not see the ezechiel. If someone cocainise the ezechiel then the ezechiel manhandle the trevar. If someone manhandle the trevar and they see the lefty then the trevar manhandle the lefty. If the ezechiel prospect the trevar then the ezechiel cocainise the lefty. If someone prospect the ezechiel and the ezechiel cocainise the lefty then the lefty is not bicornuous. The lefty does not like the lefty.", "logic": "\nAphetic(lefty)\nCocainise(lefty, ezechiel)\nManhandle(lefty, gratiana)\nCocainise(trevar, gratiana)\nProspect(gratiana, lefty)\nManhandle(gratiana, lefty)\nProspect(ezechiel, trevar)\nforall x (Manhandle(x, gratiana) -> Prospect(gratiana, ezechiel))\nMidmost(lefty) and not Cocainise(lefty, ezechiel) -> Manhandle(lefty, trevar)\nforall x (Prospect(x, ezechiel) -> Manhandle(ezechiel, lefty))\nforall x (Prospect(x, lefty) and Ample(lefty) -> not Manhandle(lefty, ezechiel))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, ezechiel) -> Manhandle(ezechiel, trevar))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, trevar) and Manhandle(x, lefty) -> Manhandle(trevar, lefty))\nProspect(ezechiel, trevar) -> Cocainise(ezechiel, lefty)\nforall x (Prospect(x, ezechiel) and Cocainise(ezechiel, lefty) -> not Bicornuous(lefty))\n\nnot Prospect(lefty, lefty)\n\nnot Prospect(lefty, lefty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The leanor is blowsy. The leanor whop the hedwig. The leanor compare the agnesse. The brody whop the agnesse. The agnesse abhor the leanor. The agnesse compare the leanor. The hedwig abhor the brody. If someone compare the agnesse then the agnesse abhor the hedwig. If the leanor is exotic and the leanor does not need the hedwig then the leanor compare the brody. If someone abhor the hedwig then the hedwig compare the leanor. If someone abhor the leanor and the leanor is tinpot then the leanor does not see the hedwig. If someone whop the hedwig then the hedwig compare the brody. If someone compare the brody and they see the leanor then the brody compare the leanor. If the hedwig abhor the brody then the hedwig whop the leanor. If someone abhor the hedwig and the hedwig whop the leanor then the leanor is not immobile. The leanor compare the hedwig.", "logic": "\nBlowsy(leanor)\nWhop(leanor, hedwig)\nCompare(leanor, agnesse)\nWhop(brody, agnesse)\nAbhor(agnesse, leanor)\nCompare(agnesse, leanor)\nAbhor(hedwig, brody)\nforall x (Compare(x, agnesse) -> Abhor(agnesse, hedwig))\nExotic(leanor) and not Whop(leanor, hedwig) -> Compare(leanor, brody)\nforall x (Abhor(x, hedwig) -> Compare(hedwig, leanor))\nforall x (Abhor(x, leanor) and Tinpot(leanor) -> not Compare(leanor, hedwig))\nforall x (Whop(x, hedwig) -> Compare(hedwig, brody))\nforall x (Compare(x, brody) and Compare(x, leanor) -> Compare(brody, leanor))\nAbhor(hedwig, brody) -> Whop(hedwig, leanor)\nforall x (Abhor(x, hedwig) and Whop(hedwig, leanor) -> not Immobile(leanor))\n\nCompare(leanor, hedwig)\n\nCompare(leanor, hedwig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-322"} {"premises": "The wandis is barometric. The wandis is not testate. The wandis is not pancreatic. Cold things are not testate. If something is byzantine and barometric then it is not testate. Cold, pancreatic things are testate. Cold things are byzantine. All pancreatic things are legato. If something is barometric and not byzantine then it is legato. If something is testate and not byzantine then it is not legato. Green things are legato. The wandis is barometric.", "logic": "\nBarometric(wandis)\nnot Testate(wandis)\nnot Pancreatic(wandis)\nforall x (Barometric(x) -> not Testate(x))\nforall x (Byzantine(x) and Barometric(x) -> not Testate(x))\nforall x (Barometric(x) and Pancreatic(x) -> Testate(x))\nforall x (Barometric(x) -> Byzantine(x))\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Barometric(x) and not Byzantine(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Testate(x) and not Byzantine(x) -> not Legato(x))\nforall x (Testate(x) -> Legato(x))\n\nBarometric(wandis)\n\ntherefore Barometric(wandis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4314"} {"premises": "The dalila is assuasive. The dalila is not finer. The dalila is not bilious. Cold things are not finer. If something is campestral and assuasive then it is not finer. Cold, bilious things are finer. Cold things are campestral. All bilious things are bareheaded. If something is assuasive and not campestral then it is bareheaded. If something is finer and not campestral then it is not bareheaded. Green things are bareheaded. The dalila is not assuasive.", "logic": "\nAssuasive(dalila)\nnot Finer(dalila)\nnot Bilious(dalila)\nforall x (Assuasive(x) -> not Finer(x))\nforall x (Campestral(x) and Assuasive(x) -> not Finer(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and Bilious(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) -> Campestral(x))\nforall x (Bilious(x) -> Bareheaded(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and not Campestral(x) -> Bareheaded(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) and not Campestral(x) -> not Bareheaded(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Bareheaded(x))\n\nnot Assuasive(dalila)\n\ntherefore Assuasive(dalila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4314"} {"premises": "The mayda is variolar. The mayda is not sloshed. The mayda is not categoric. Cold things are not sloshed. If something is boskopoid and variolar then it is not sloshed. Cold, categoric things are sloshed. Cold things are boskopoid. All categoric things are cowardly. If something is variolar and not boskopoid then it is cowardly. If something is sloshed and not boskopoid then it is not cowardly. Green things are cowardly. The mayda is not cowardly.", "logic": "\nVariolar(mayda)\nnot Sloshed(mayda)\nnot Categoric(mayda)\nforall x (Variolar(x) -> not Sloshed(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) and Variolar(x) -> not Sloshed(x))\nforall x (Variolar(x) and Categoric(x) -> Sloshed(x))\nforall x (Variolar(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Cowardly(x))\nforall x (Variolar(x) and not Boskopoid(x) -> Cowardly(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) and not Boskopoid(x) -> not Cowardly(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Cowardly(x))\n\nnot Cowardly(mayda)\n\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Cowardly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4314"} {"premises": "The morena is nascent. The morena is not oddish. The morena is not hemolytic. Cold things are not oddish. If something is saprozoic and nascent then it is not oddish. Cold, hemolytic things are oddish. Cold things are saprozoic. All hemolytic things are reposeful. If something is nascent and not saprozoic then it is reposeful. If something is oddish and not saprozoic then it is not reposeful. Green things are reposeful. The morena sees the morena.", "logic": "\nNascent(morena)\nnot Oddish(morena)\nnot Hemolytic(morena)\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> not Oddish(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) and Nascent(x) -> not Oddish(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and Hemolytic(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> Saprozoic(x))\nforall x (Hemolytic(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and not Saprozoic(x) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) and not Saprozoic(x) -> not Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Reposeful(x))\n\nSees(morena, morena)\n\nSees(morena, morena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4314"} {"premises": "The minette customize the vanny. The minette mend the hans. The minette derange the lucien. The vanny mend the lucien. The hans is unleaded. The hans mend the vanny. The hans derange the lucien. The lucien customize the hans. The lucien is curvey. The lucien mend the minette. If someone is unleaded and they chase the minette then they chase the lucien. If the minette customize the vanny then the minette derange the vanny. If someone derange the vanny and they like the hans then the hans customize the minette. If someone customize the vanny and the vanny is curvey then they chase the lucien. If the hans is shoed then the hans customize the lucien. If someone customize the lucien and the lucien derange the minette then they chase the hans. The minette derange the lucien.", "logic": "\nCustomize(minette, vanny)\nMend(minette, hans)\nDerange(minette, lucien)\nMend(vanny, lucien)\nUnleaded(hans)\nMend(hans, vanny)\nDerange(hans, lucien)\nCustomize(lucien, hans)\nCurvey(lucien)\nMend(lucien, minette)\nforall x (Unleaded(x) and Customize(x, minette) -> Customize(x, lucien))\nCustomize(minette, vanny) -> Derange(minette, vanny)\nforall x (Derange(x, vanny) and Mend(x, hans) -> Customize(hans, minette))\nforall x (Customize(x, vanny) and Curvey(vanny) -> Customize(x, lucien))\nShoed(hans) -> Customize(hans, lucien)\nforall x (Customize(x, lucien) and Derange(lucien, minette) -> Customize(x, hans))\n\nDerange(minette, lucien)\n\ntherefore Derange(minette, lucien)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The nicol lighter the wendall. The nicol stag the vito. The nicol dazzle the devora. The wendall stag the devora. The vito is xlvi. The vito stag the wendall. The vito dazzle the devora. The devora lighter the vito. The devora is secretive. The devora stag the nicol. If someone is xlvi and they chase the nicol then they chase the devora. If the nicol lighter the wendall then the nicol dazzle the wendall. If someone dazzle the wendall and they like the vito then the vito lighter the nicol. If someone lighter the wendall and the wendall is secretive then they chase the devora. If the vito is literate then the vito lighter the devora. If someone lighter the devora and the devora dazzle the nicol then they chase the vito. The wendall does not like the devora.", "logic": "\nLighter(nicol, wendall)\nStag(nicol, vito)\nDazzle(nicol, devora)\nStag(wendall, devora)\nXlvi(vito)\nStag(vito, wendall)\nDazzle(vito, devora)\nLighter(devora, vito)\nSecretive(devora)\nStag(devora, nicol)\nforall x (Xlvi(x) and Lighter(x, nicol) -> Lighter(x, devora))\nLighter(nicol, wendall) -> Dazzle(nicol, wendall)\nforall x (Dazzle(x, wendall) and Stag(x, vito) -> Lighter(vito, nicol))\nforall x (Lighter(x, wendall) and Secretive(wendall) -> Lighter(x, devora))\nLiterate(vito) -> Lighter(vito, devora)\nforall x (Lighter(x, devora) and Dazzle(devora, nicol) -> Lighter(x, vito))\n\nnot Stag(wendall, devora)\n\ntherefore Stag(wendall, devora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The harley deaf the annadiane. The harley castrate the tarah. The harley dynamite the margurite. The annadiane castrate the margurite. The tarah is lxxxiii. The tarah castrate the annadiane. The tarah dynamite the margurite. The margurite deaf the tarah. The margurite is gaelic. The margurite castrate the harley. If someone is lxxxiii and they chase the harley then they chase the margurite. If the harley deaf the annadiane then the harley dynamite the annadiane. If someone dynamite the annadiane and they like the tarah then the tarah deaf the harley. If someone deaf the annadiane and the annadiane is gaelic then they chase the margurite. If the tarah is finable then the tarah deaf the margurite. If someone deaf the margurite and the margurite dynamite the harley then they chase the tarah. The harley dynamite the annadiane.", "logic": "\nDeaf(harley, annadiane)\nCastrate(harley, tarah)\nDynamite(harley, margurite)\nCastrate(annadiane, margurite)\nLxxxiii(tarah)\nCastrate(tarah, annadiane)\nDynamite(tarah, margurite)\nDeaf(margurite, tarah)\nGaelic(margurite)\nCastrate(margurite, harley)\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) and Deaf(x, harley) -> Deaf(x, margurite))\nDeaf(harley, annadiane) -> Dynamite(harley, annadiane)\nforall x (Dynamite(x, annadiane) and Castrate(x, tarah) -> Deaf(tarah, harley))\nforall x (Deaf(x, annadiane) and Gaelic(annadiane) -> Deaf(x, margurite))\nFinable(tarah) -> Deaf(tarah, margurite)\nforall x (Deaf(x, margurite) and Dynamite(margurite, harley) -> Deaf(x, tarah))\n\nDynamite(harley, annadiane)\n\nDeaf(harley, annadiane) and Deaf(harley, annadiane) -> Dynamite(harley, annadiane) -> therefore Dynamite(harley, annadiane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The erik brush the ravil. The erik bulldoze the shell. The erik quetch the roger. The ravil bulldoze the roger. The shell is teensy. The shell bulldoze the ravil. The shell quetch the roger. The roger brush the shell. The roger is changing. The roger bulldoze the erik. If someone is teensy and they chase the erik then they chase the roger. If the erik brush the ravil then the erik quetch the ravil. If someone quetch the ravil and they like the shell then the shell brush the erik. If someone brush the ravil and the ravil is changing then they chase the roger. If the shell is brainsick then the shell brush the roger. If someone brush the roger and the roger quetch the erik then they chase the shell. The erik does not need the ravil.", "logic": "\nBrush(erik, ravil)\nBulldoze(erik, shell)\nQuetch(erik, roger)\nBulldoze(ravil, roger)\nTeensy(shell)\nBulldoze(shell, ravil)\nQuetch(shell, roger)\nBrush(roger, shell)\nChanging(roger)\nBulldoze(roger, erik)\nforall x (Teensy(x) and Brush(x, erik) -> Brush(x, roger))\nBrush(erik, ravil) -> Quetch(erik, ravil)\nforall x (Quetch(x, ravil) and Bulldoze(x, shell) -> Brush(shell, erik))\nforall x (Brush(x, ravil) and Changing(ravil) -> Brush(x, roger))\nBrainsick(shell) -> Brush(shell, roger)\nforall x (Brush(x, roger) and Quetch(roger, erik) -> Brush(x, shell))\n\nnot Quetch(erik, ravil)\n\nBrush(erik, ravil) and Brush(erik, ravil) -> Quetch(erik, ravil) -> therefore Quetch(erik, ravil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The eadith steamroll the lorita. The eadith emasculate the almira. The eadith predicate the georgeta. The lorita emasculate the georgeta. The almira is sharpened. The almira emasculate the lorita. The almira predicate the georgeta. The georgeta steamroll the almira. The georgeta is smokeless. The georgeta emasculate the eadith. If someone is sharpened and they chase the eadith then they chase the georgeta. If the eadith steamroll the lorita then the eadith predicate the lorita. If someone predicate the lorita and they like the almira then the almira steamroll the eadith. If someone steamroll the lorita and the lorita is smokeless then they chase the georgeta. If the almira is marine then the almira steamroll the georgeta. If someone steamroll the georgeta and the georgeta predicate the eadith then they chase the almira. The almira steamroll the eadith.", "logic": "\nSteamroll(eadith, lorita)\nEmasculate(eadith, almira)\nPredicate(eadith, georgeta)\nEmasculate(lorita, georgeta)\nSharpened(almira)\nEmasculate(almira, lorita)\nPredicate(almira, georgeta)\nSteamroll(georgeta, almira)\nSmokeless(georgeta)\nEmasculate(georgeta, eadith)\nforall x (Sharpened(x) and Steamroll(x, eadith) -> Steamroll(x, georgeta))\nSteamroll(eadith, lorita) -> Predicate(eadith, lorita)\nforall x (Predicate(x, lorita) and Emasculate(x, almira) -> Steamroll(almira, eadith))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, lorita) and Smokeless(lorita) -> Steamroll(x, georgeta))\nMarine(almira) -> Steamroll(almira, georgeta)\nforall x (Steamroll(x, georgeta) and Predicate(georgeta, eadith) -> Steamroll(x, almira))\n\nSteamroll(almira, eadith)\n\nSteamroll(eadith, lorita) and Steamroll(eadith, lorita) -> Predicate(eadith, lorita) -> therefore Predicate(eadith, lorita) Predicate(eadith, lorita) and Emasculate(eadith, almira) and forall x (Predicate(x, lorita) and Emasculate(x, almira) -> Steamroll(almira, eadith)) -> therefore Steamroll(almira, eadith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The tessy trigger the chad. The tessy hunker the prudi. The tessy underlie the celestyna. The chad hunker the celestyna. The prudi is unequalled. The prudi hunker the chad. The prudi underlie the celestyna. The celestyna trigger the prudi. The celestyna is opalescent. The celestyna hunker the tessy. If someone is unequalled and they chase the tessy then they chase the celestyna. If the tessy trigger the chad then the tessy underlie the chad. If someone underlie the chad and they like the prudi then the prudi trigger the tessy. If someone trigger the chad and the chad is opalescent then they chase the celestyna. If the prudi is thousand then the prudi trigger the celestyna. If someone trigger the celestyna and the celestyna underlie the tessy then they chase the prudi. The prudi does not chase the tessy.", "logic": "\nTrigger(tessy, chad)\nHunker(tessy, prudi)\nUnderlie(tessy, celestyna)\nHunker(chad, celestyna)\nUnequalled(prudi)\nHunker(prudi, chad)\nUnderlie(prudi, celestyna)\nTrigger(celestyna, prudi)\nOpalescent(celestyna)\nHunker(celestyna, tessy)\nforall x (Unequalled(x) and Trigger(x, tessy) -> Trigger(x, celestyna))\nTrigger(tessy, chad) -> Underlie(tessy, chad)\nforall x (Underlie(x, chad) and Hunker(x, prudi) -> Trigger(prudi, tessy))\nforall x (Trigger(x, chad) and Opalescent(chad) -> Trigger(x, celestyna))\nThousand(prudi) -> Trigger(prudi, celestyna)\nforall x (Trigger(x, celestyna) and Underlie(celestyna, tessy) -> Trigger(x, prudi))\n\nnot Trigger(prudi, tessy)\n\nTrigger(tessy, chad) and Trigger(tessy, chad) -> Underlie(tessy, chad) -> therefore Underlie(tessy, chad) Underlie(tessy, chad) and Hunker(tessy, prudi) and forall x (Underlie(x, chad) and Hunker(x, prudi) -> Trigger(prudi, tessy)) -> therefore Trigger(prudi, tessy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The charissa purr the hortensia. The charissa forget the zachery. The charissa torment the mariele. The hortensia forget the mariele. The zachery is mastoid. The zachery forget the hortensia. The zachery torment the mariele. The mariele purr the zachery. The mariele is creamy. The mariele forget the charissa. If someone is mastoid and they chase the charissa then they chase the mariele. If the charissa purr the hortensia then the charissa torment the hortensia. If someone torment the hortensia and they like the zachery then the zachery purr the charissa. If someone purr the hortensia and the hortensia is creamy then they chase the mariele. If the zachery is addlepated then the zachery purr the mariele. If someone purr the mariele and the mariele torment the charissa then they chase the zachery. The zachery purr the mariele.", "logic": "\nPurr(charissa, hortensia)\nForget(charissa, zachery)\nTorment(charissa, mariele)\nForget(hortensia, mariele)\nMastoid(zachery)\nForget(zachery, hortensia)\nTorment(zachery, mariele)\nPurr(mariele, zachery)\nCreamy(mariele)\nForget(mariele, charissa)\nforall x (Mastoid(x) and Purr(x, charissa) -> Purr(x, mariele))\nPurr(charissa, hortensia) -> Torment(charissa, hortensia)\nforall x (Torment(x, hortensia) and Forget(x, zachery) -> Purr(zachery, charissa))\nforall x (Purr(x, hortensia) and Creamy(hortensia) -> Purr(x, mariele))\nAddlepated(zachery) -> Purr(zachery, mariele)\nforall x (Purr(x, mariele) and Torment(mariele, charissa) -> Purr(x, zachery))\n\nPurr(zachery, mariele)\n\nPurr(charissa, hortensia) and Purr(charissa, hortensia) -> Torment(charissa, hortensia) -> therefore Torment(charissa, hortensia) Torment(charissa, hortensia) and Forget(charissa, zachery) and forall x (Torment(x, hortensia) and Forget(x, zachery) -> Purr(zachery, charissa)) -> therefore Purr(zachery, charissa) Mastoid(zachery) and Purr(zachery, charissa) and forall x (Mastoid(x) and Purr(x, charissa) -> Purr(x, mariele)) -> therefore Purr(zachery, mariele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The shirley decant the amanda. The shirley format the canada. The shirley reseat the charlena. The amanda format the charlena. The canada is pauline. The canada format the amanda. The canada reseat the charlena. The charlena decant the canada. The charlena is carotid. The charlena format the shirley. If someone is pauline and they chase the shirley then they chase the charlena. If the shirley decant the amanda then the shirley reseat the amanda. If someone reseat the amanda and they like the canada then the canada decant the shirley. If someone decant the amanda and the amanda is carotid then they chase the charlena. If the canada is miffed then the canada decant the charlena. If someone decant the charlena and the charlena reseat the shirley then they chase the canada. The canada does not chase the charlena.", "logic": "\nDecant(shirley, amanda)\nFormat(shirley, canada)\nReseat(shirley, charlena)\nFormat(amanda, charlena)\nPauline(canada)\nFormat(canada, amanda)\nReseat(canada, charlena)\nDecant(charlena, canada)\nCarotid(charlena)\nFormat(charlena, shirley)\nforall x (Pauline(x) and Decant(x, shirley) -> Decant(x, charlena))\nDecant(shirley, amanda) -> Reseat(shirley, amanda)\nforall x (Reseat(x, amanda) and Format(x, canada) -> Decant(canada, shirley))\nforall x (Decant(x, amanda) and Carotid(amanda) -> Decant(x, charlena))\nMiffed(canada) -> Decant(canada, charlena)\nforall x (Decant(x, charlena) and Reseat(charlena, shirley) -> Decant(x, canada))\n\nnot Decant(canada, charlena)\n\nDecant(shirley, amanda) and Decant(shirley, amanda) -> Reseat(shirley, amanda) -> therefore Reseat(shirley, amanda) Reseat(shirley, amanda) and Format(shirley, canada) and forall x (Reseat(x, amanda) and Format(x, canada) -> Decant(canada, shirley)) -> therefore Decant(canada, shirley) Pauline(canada) and Decant(canada, shirley) and forall x (Pauline(x) and Decant(x, shirley) -> Decant(x, charlena)) -> therefore Decant(canada, charlena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The eleni inflame the charyl. The eleni fight the olimpia. The eleni fight the sander. The charyl fight the sander. The olimpia is ribbed. The olimpia fight the charyl. The olimpia fight the sander. The sander inflame the olimpia. The sander is rhizoidal. The sander fight the eleni. If someone is ribbed and they chase the eleni then they chase the sander. If the eleni inflame the charyl then the eleni fight the charyl. If someone fight the charyl and they like the olimpia then the olimpia inflame the eleni. If someone inflame the charyl and the charyl is rhizoidal then they chase the sander. If the olimpia is fernless then the olimpia inflame the sander. If someone inflame the sander and the sander fight the eleni then they chase the olimpia. The charyl does not chase the sander.", "logic": "\nInflame(eleni, charyl)\nFight(eleni, olimpia)\nFight(eleni, sander)\nFight(charyl, sander)\nRibbed(olimpia)\nFight(olimpia, charyl)\nFight(olimpia, sander)\nInflame(sander, olimpia)\nRhizoidal(sander)\nFight(sander, eleni)\nforall x (Ribbed(x) and Inflame(x, eleni) -> Inflame(x, sander))\nInflame(eleni, charyl) -> Fight(eleni, charyl)\nforall x (Fight(x, charyl) and Fight(x, olimpia) -> Inflame(olimpia, eleni))\nforall x (Inflame(x, charyl) and Rhizoidal(charyl) -> Inflame(x, sander))\nFernless(olimpia) -> Inflame(olimpia, sander)\nforall x (Inflame(x, sander) and Fight(sander, eleni) -> Inflame(x, olimpia))\n\nnot Inflame(charyl, sander)\n\nforall x (Ribbed(x) and Inflame(x, eleni) -> Inflame(x, sander)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The desdemona sideswipe the jerome. The desdemona apprise the lita. The desdemona plumb the blondie. The jerome apprise the blondie. The lita is superior. The lita apprise the jerome. The lita plumb the blondie. The blondie sideswipe the lita. The blondie is caecilian. The blondie apprise the desdemona. If someone is superior and they chase the desdemona then they chase the blondie. If the desdemona sideswipe the jerome then the desdemona plumb the jerome. If someone plumb the jerome and they like the lita then the lita sideswipe the desdemona. If someone sideswipe the jerome and the jerome is caecilian then they chase the blondie. If the lita is malayan then the lita sideswipe the blondie. If someone sideswipe the blondie and the blondie plumb the desdemona then they chase the lita. The jerome sideswipe the lita.", "logic": "\nSideswipe(desdemona, jerome)\nApprise(desdemona, lita)\nPlumb(desdemona, blondie)\nApprise(jerome, blondie)\nSuperior(lita)\nApprise(lita, jerome)\nPlumb(lita, blondie)\nSideswipe(blondie, lita)\nCaecilian(blondie)\nApprise(blondie, desdemona)\nforall x (Superior(x) and Sideswipe(x, desdemona) -> Sideswipe(x, blondie))\nSideswipe(desdemona, jerome) -> Plumb(desdemona, jerome)\nforall x (Plumb(x, jerome) and Apprise(x, lita) -> Sideswipe(lita, desdemona))\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, jerome) and Caecilian(jerome) -> Sideswipe(x, blondie))\nMalayan(lita) -> Sideswipe(lita, blondie)\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, blondie) and Plumb(blondie, desdemona) -> Sideswipe(x, lita))\n\nSideswipe(jerome, lita)\n\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, blondie) and Plumb(blondie, desdemona) -> Sideswipe(x, lita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The wang kink the shepperd. The wang winter the sarajane. The wang sensify the karalynn. The shepperd winter the karalynn. The sarajane is bilabiate. The sarajane winter the shepperd. The sarajane sensify the karalynn. The karalynn kink the sarajane. The karalynn is alleviated. The karalynn winter the wang. If someone is bilabiate and they chase the wang then they chase the karalynn. If the wang kink the shepperd then the wang sensify the shepperd. If someone sensify the shepperd and they like the sarajane then the sarajane kink the wang. If someone kink the shepperd and the shepperd is alleviated then they chase the karalynn. If the sarajane is crustlike then the sarajane kink the karalynn. If someone kink the karalynn and the karalynn sensify the wang then they chase the sarajane. The wang does not chase the sarajane.", "logic": "\nKink(wang, shepperd)\nWinter(wang, sarajane)\nSensify(wang, karalynn)\nWinter(shepperd, karalynn)\nBilabiate(sarajane)\nWinter(sarajane, shepperd)\nSensify(sarajane, karalynn)\nKink(karalynn, sarajane)\nAlleviated(karalynn)\nWinter(karalynn, wang)\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) and Kink(x, wang) -> Kink(x, karalynn))\nKink(wang, shepperd) -> Sensify(wang, shepperd)\nforall x (Sensify(x, shepperd) and Winter(x, sarajane) -> Kink(sarajane, wang))\nforall x (Kink(x, shepperd) and Alleviated(shepperd) -> Kink(x, karalynn))\nCrustlike(sarajane) -> Kink(sarajane, karalynn)\nforall x (Kink(x, karalynn) and Sensify(karalynn, wang) -> Kink(x, sarajane))\n\nnot Kink(wang, sarajane)\n\nforall x (Kink(x, karalynn) and Sensify(karalynn, wang) -> Kink(x, sarajane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The lonni annoy the lorraine. The lonni connect the sharona. The lonni galvanize the etheline. The lorraine connect the etheline. The sharona is ocular. The sharona connect the lorraine. The sharona galvanize the etheline. The etheline annoy the sharona. The etheline is serious. The etheline connect the lonni. If someone is ocular and they chase the lonni then they chase the etheline. If the lonni annoy the lorraine then the lonni galvanize the lorraine. If someone galvanize the lorraine and they like the sharona then the sharona annoy the lonni. If someone annoy the lorraine and the lorraine is serious then they chase the etheline. If the sharona is calumnious then the sharona annoy the etheline. If someone annoy the etheline and the etheline galvanize the lonni then they chase the sharona. The lonni annoy the etheline.", "logic": "\nAnnoy(lonni, lorraine)\nConnect(lonni, sharona)\nGalvanize(lonni, etheline)\nConnect(lorraine, etheline)\nOcular(sharona)\nConnect(sharona, lorraine)\nGalvanize(sharona, etheline)\nAnnoy(etheline, sharona)\nSerious(etheline)\nConnect(etheline, lonni)\nforall x (Ocular(x) and Annoy(x, lonni) -> Annoy(x, etheline))\nAnnoy(lonni, lorraine) -> Galvanize(lonni, lorraine)\nforall x (Galvanize(x, lorraine) and Connect(x, sharona) -> Annoy(sharona, lonni))\nforall x (Annoy(x, lorraine) and Serious(lorraine) -> Annoy(x, etheline))\nCalumnious(sharona) -> Annoy(sharona, etheline)\nforall x (Annoy(x, etheline) and Galvanize(etheline, lonni) -> Annoy(x, sharona))\n\nAnnoy(lonni, etheline)\n\nforall x (Ocular(x) and Annoy(x, lonni) -> Annoy(x, etheline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The novelia orphan the niven. The novelia foul the clemens. The novelia deliberate the lisbeth. The niven foul the lisbeth. The clemens is projecting. The clemens foul the niven. The clemens deliberate the lisbeth. The lisbeth orphan the clemens. The lisbeth is unrigged. The lisbeth foul the novelia. If someone is projecting and they chase the novelia then they chase the lisbeth. If the novelia orphan the niven then the novelia deliberate the niven. If someone deliberate the niven and they like the clemens then the clemens orphan the novelia. If someone orphan the niven and the niven is unrigged then they chase the lisbeth. If the clemens is expiable then the clemens orphan the lisbeth. If someone orphan the lisbeth and the lisbeth deliberate the novelia then they chase the clemens. The clemens is not kind.", "logic": "\nOrphan(novelia, niven)\nFoul(novelia, clemens)\nDeliberate(novelia, lisbeth)\nFoul(niven, lisbeth)\nProjecting(clemens)\nFoul(clemens, niven)\nDeliberate(clemens, lisbeth)\nOrphan(lisbeth, clemens)\nUnrigged(lisbeth)\nFoul(lisbeth, novelia)\nforall x (Projecting(x) and Orphan(x, novelia) -> Orphan(x, lisbeth))\nOrphan(novelia, niven) -> Deliberate(novelia, niven)\nforall x (Deliberate(x, niven) and Foul(x, clemens) -> Orphan(clemens, novelia))\nforall x (Orphan(x, niven) and Unrigged(niven) -> Orphan(x, lisbeth))\nExpiable(clemens) -> Orphan(clemens, lisbeth)\nforall x (Orphan(x, lisbeth) and Deliberate(lisbeth, novelia) -> Orphan(x, clemens))\n\nnot Kind(clemens)\n\nnot Kind(clemens) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The ninon knit the elric. The ninon slue the astra. The ninon handcraft the skipton. The elric slue the skipton. The astra is vibrant. The astra slue the elric. The astra handcraft the skipton. The skipton knit the astra. The skipton is intolerant. The skipton slue the ninon. If someone is vibrant and they chase the ninon then they chase the skipton. If the ninon knit the elric then the ninon handcraft the elric. If someone handcraft the elric and they like the astra then the astra knit the ninon. If someone knit the elric and the elric is intolerant then they chase the skipton. If the astra is epiphyseal then the astra knit the skipton. If someone knit the skipton and the skipton handcraft the ninon then they chase the astra. The elric handcraft the skipton.", "logic": "\nKnit(ninon, elric)\nSlue(ninon, astra)\nHandcraft(ninon, skipton)\nSlue(elric, skipton)\nVibrant(astra)\nSlue(astra, elric)\nHandcraft(astra, skipton)\nKnit(skipton, astra)\nIntolerant(skipton)\nSlue(skipton, ninon)\nforall x (Vibrant(x) and Knit(x, ninon) -> Knit(x, skipton))\nKnit(ninon, elric) -> Handcraft(ninon, elric)\nforall x (Handcraft(x, elric) and Slue(x, astra) -> Knit(astra, ninon))\nforall x (Knit(x, elric) and Intolerant(elric) -> Knit(x, skipton))\nEpiphyseal(astra) -> Knit(astra, skipton)\nforall x (Knit(x, skipton) and Handcraft(skipton, ninon) -> Knit(x, astra))\n\nHandcraft(elric, skipton)\n\nHandcraft(elric, skipton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The obadiah dramatise the sharline. The obadiah coact the bruce. The obadiah calender the moya. The sharline coact the moya. The bruce is lapidary. The bruce coact the sharline. The bruce calender the moya. The moya dramatise the bruce. The moya is salt. The moya coact the obadiah. If someone is lapidary and they chase the obadiah then they chase the moya. If the obadiah dramatise the sharline then the obadiah calender the sharline. If someone calender the sharline and they like the bruce then the bruce dramatise the obadiah. If someone dramatise the sharline and the sharline is salt then they chase the moya. If the bruce is hinder then the bruce dramatise the moya. If someone dramatise the moya and the moya calender the obadiah then they chase the bruce. The bruce does not need the sharline.", "logic": "\nDramatise(obadiah, sharline)\nCoact(obadiah, bruce)\nCalender(obadiah, moya)\nCoact(sharline, moya)\nLapidary(bruce)\nCoact(bruce, sharline)\nCalender(bruce, moya)\nDramatise(moya, bruce)\nSalt(moya)\nCoact(moya, obadiah)\nforall x (Lapidary(x) and Dramatise(x, obadiah) -> Dramatise(x, moya))\nDramatise(obadiah, sharline) -> Calender(obadiah, sharline)\nforall x (Calender(x, sharline) and Coact(x, bruce) -> Dramatise(bruce, obadiah))\nforall x (Dramatise(x, sharline) and Salt(sharline) -> Dramatise(x, moya))\nHinder(bruce) -> Dramatise(bruce, moya)\nforall x (Dramatise(x, moya) and Calender(moya, obadiah) -> Dramatise(x, bruce))\n\nnot Calender(bruce, sharline)\n\nnot Calender(bruce, sharline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The rafa assume the margette. The rafa caliper the lianne. The rafa gild the delora. The margette caliper the delora. The lianne is countless. The lianne caliper the margette. The lianne gild the delora. The delora assume the lianne. The delora is capitular. The delora caliper the rafa. If someone is countless and they chase the rafa then they chase the delora. If the rafa assume the margette then the rafa gild the margette. If someone gild the margette and they like the lianne then the lianne assume the rafa. If someone assume the margette and the margette is capitular then they chase the delora. If the lianne is unlivable then the lianne assume the delora. If someone assume the delora and the delora gild the rafa then they chase the lianne. The delora is unlivable.", "logic": "\nAssume(rafa, margette)\nCaliper(rafa, lianne)\nGild(rafa, delora)\nCaliper(margette, delora)\nCountless(lianne)\nCaliper(lianne, margette)\nGild(lianne, delora)\nAssume(delora, lianne)\nCapitular(delora)\nCaliper(delora, rafa)\nforall x (Countless(x) and Assume(x, rafa) -> Assume(x, delora))\nAssume(rafa, margette) -> Gild(rafa, margette)\nforall x (Gild(x, margette) and Caliper(x, lianne) -> Assume(lianne, rafa))\nforall x (Assume(x, margette) and Capitular(margette) -> Assume(x, delora))\nUnlivable(lianne) -> Assume(lianne, delora)\nforall x (Assume(x, delora) and Gild(delora, rafa) -> Assume(x, lianne))\n\nUnlivable(delora)\n\nUnlivable(delora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-329"} {"premises": "The bessie switch the jayme. The bessie is preeminent. The bessie is binding. The bessie is antifungal. The bessie is tarry. The bessie naturalise the jayme. The bessie trot the jayme. The jayme switch the bessie. The jayme is binding. The jayme is antifungal. If something naturalise the jayme then it trot the jayme. If something is preeminent and it trot the bessie then it naturalise the jayme. If something switch the bessie then it is stolid. If something is stolid and it switch the bessie then it naturalise the jayme. If something switch the bessie then the bessie naturalise the jayme. If something switch the bessie then it is binding. If something naturalise the jayme and it is stolid then it naturalise the bessie. If something is binding and stolid then it naturalise the bessie. The bessie naturalise the jayme.", "logic": "\nSwitch(bessie, jayme)\nPreeminent(bessie)\nBinding(bessie)\nAntifungal(bessie)\nTarry(bessie)\nNaturalise(bessie, jayme)\nTrot(bessie, jayme)\nSwitch(jayme, bessie)\nBinding(jayme)\nAntifungal(jayme)\nforall x (Naturalise(x, jayme) -> Trot(x, jayme))\nforall x (Preeminent(x) and Trot(x, bessie) -> Naturalise(x, jayme))\nforall x (Switch(x, bessie) -> Stolid(x))\nforall x (Stolid(x) and Switch(x, bessie) -> Naturalise(x, jayme))\nforall x (Switch(x, bessie) -> Naturalise(bessie, jayme))\nforall x (Switch(x, bessie) -> Binding(x))\nforall x (Naturalise(x, jayme) and Stolid(x) -> Naturalise(x, bessie))\nforall x (Binding(x) and Stolid(x) -> Naturalise(x, bessie))\n\nNaturalise(bessie, jayme)\n\ntherefore Naturalise(bessie, jayme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The riley nasale the emmaline. The riley is monogynic. The riley is snarly. The riley is embonpoint. The riley is activistic. The riley petition the emmaline. The riley blotch the emmaline. The emmaline nasale the riley. The emmaline is snarly. The emmaline is embonpoint. If something petition the emmaline then it blotch the emmaline. If something is monogynic and it blotch the riley then it petition the emmaline. If something nasale the riley then it is idiopathic. If something is idiopathic and it nasale the riley then it petition the emmaline. If something nasale the riley then the riley petition the emmaline. If something nasale the riley then it is snarly. If something petition the emmaline and it is idiopathic then it petition the riley. If something is snarly and idiopathic then it petition the riley. The riley is not snarly.", "logic": "\nNasale(riley, emmaline)\nMonogynic(riley)\nSnarly(riley)\nEmbonpoint(riley)\nActivistic(riley)\nPetition(riley, emmaline)\nBlotch(riley, emmaline)\nNasale(emmaline, riley)\nSnarly(emmaline)\nEmbonpoint(emmaline)\nforall x (Petition(x, emmaline) -> Blotch(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) and Blotch(x, riley) -> Petition(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Nasale(x, riley) -> Idiopathic(x))\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) and Nasale(x, riley) -> Petition(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Nasale(x, riley) -> Petition(riley, emmaline))\nforall x (Nasale(x, riley) -> Snarly(x))\nforall x (Petition(x, emmaline) and Idiopathic(x) -> Petition(x, riley))\nforall x (Snarly(x) and Idiopathic(x) -> Petition(x, riley))\n\nnot Snarly(riley)\n\ntherefore Snarly(riley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The blancha skyrocket the jermaine. The blancha is comfy. The blancha is sopranino. The blancha is contraband. The blancha is brave. The blancha dibble the jermaine. The blancha telescope the jermaine. The jermaine skyrocket the blancha. The jermaine is sopranino. The jermaine is contraband. If something dibble the jermaine then it telescope the jermaine. If something is comfy and it telescope the blancha then it dibble the jermaine. If something skyrocket the blancha then it is gothic. If something is gothic and it skyrocket the blancha then it dibble the jermaine. If something skyrocket the blancha then the blancha dibble the jermaine. If something skyrocket the blancha then it is sopranino. If something dibble the jermaine and it is gothic then it dibble the blancha. If something is sopranino and gothic then it dibble the blancha. The jermaine is gothic.", "logic": "\nSkyrocket(blancha, jermaine)\nComfy(blancha)\nSopranino(blancha)\nContraband(blancha)\nBrave(blancha)\nDibble(blancha, jermaine)\nTelescope(blancha, jermaine)\nSkyrocket(jermaine, blancha)\nSopranino(jermaine)\nContraband(jermaine)\nforall x (Dibble(x, jermaine) -> Telescope(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Comfy(x) and Telescope(x, blancha) -> Dibble(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Skyrocket(x, blancha) -> Gothic(x))\nforall x (Gothic(x) and Skyrocket(x, blancha) -> Dibble(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Skyrocket(x, blancha) -> Dibble(blancha, jermaine))\nforall x (Skyrocket(x, blancha) -> Sopranino(x))\nforall x (Dibble(x, jermaine) and Gothic(x) -> Dibble(x, blancha))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) and Gothic(x) -> Dibble(x, blancha))\n\nGothic(jermaine)\n\nSkyrocket(jermaine, blancha) and forall x (Skyrocket(x, blancha) -> Gothic(x)) -> therefore Gothic(jermaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The lefty yodel the belinda. The lefty is xliv. The lefty is astral. The lefty is andorran. The lefty is tonsured. The lefty burl the belinda. The lefty regain the belinda. The belinda yodel the lefty. The belinda is astral. The belinda is andorran. If something burl the belinda then it regain the belinda. If something is xliv and it regain the lefty then it burl the belinda. If something yodel the lefty then it is cuprous. If something is cuprous and it yodel the lefty then it burl the belinda. If something yodel the lefty then the lefty burl the belinda. If something yodel the lefty then it is astral. If something burl the belinda and it is cuprous then it burl the lefty. If something is astral and cuprous then it burl the lefty. The belinda is not cuprous.", "logic": "\nYodel(lefty, belinda)\nXliv(lefty)\nAstral(lefty)\nAndorran(lefty)\nTonsured(lefty)\nBurl(lefty, belinda)\nRegain(lefty, belinda)\nYodel(belinda, lefty)\nAstral(belinda)\nAndorran(belinda)\nforall x (Burl(x, belinda) -> Regain(x, belinda))\nforall x (Xliv(x) and Regain(x, lefty) -> Burl(x, belinda))\nforall x (Yodel(x, lefty) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Cuprous(x) and Yodel(x, lefty) -> Burl(x, belinda))\nforall x (Yodel(x, lefty) -> Burl(lefty, belinda))\nforall x (Yodel(x, lefty) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Burl(x, belinda) and Cuprous(x) -> Burl(x, lefty))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Cuprous(x) -> Burl(x, lefty))\n\nnot Cuprous(belinda)\n\nYodel(belinda, lefty) and forall x (Yodel(x, lefty) -> Cuprous(x)) -> therefore Cuprous(belinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The tandi retrieve the janeen. The tandi is resinated. The tandi is unsold. The tandi is anchoritic. The tandi is huddled. The tandi flock the janeen. The tandi exhibit the janeen. The janeen retrieve the tandi. The janeen is unsold. The janeen is anchoritic. If something flock the janeen then it exhibit the janeen. If something is resinated and it exhibit the tandi then it flock the janeen. If something retrieve the tandi then it is shocked. If something is shocked and it retrieve the tandi then it flock the janeen. If something retrieve the tandi then the tandi flock the janeen. If something retrieve the tandi then it is unsold. If something flock the janeen and it is shocked then it flock the tandi. If something is unsold and shocked then it flock the tandi. The janeen flock the tandi.", "logic": "\nRetrieve(tandi, janeen)\nResinated(tandi)\nUnsold(tandi)\nAnchoritic(tandi)\nHuddled(tandi)\nFlock(tandi, janeen)\nExhibit(tandi, janeen)\nRetrieve(janeen, tandi)\nUnsold(janeen)\nAnchoritic(janeen)\nforall x (Flock(x, janeen) -> Exhibit(x, janeen))\nforall x (Resinated(x) and Exhibit(x, tandi) -> Flock(x, janeen))\nforall x (Retrieve(x, tandi) -> Shocked(x))\nforall x (Shocked(x) and Retrieve(x, tandi) -> Flock(x, janeen))\nforall x (Retrieve(x, tandi) -> Flock(tandi, janeen))\nforall x (Retrieve(x, tandi) -> Unsold(x))\nforall x (Flock(x, janeen) and Shocked(x) -> Flock(x, tandi))\nforall x (Unsold(x) and Shocked(x) -> Flock(x, tandi))\n\nFlock(janeen, tandi)\n\nRetrieve(janeen, tandi) and forall x (Retrieve(x, tandi) -> Shocked(x)) -> therefore Shocked(janeen) Unsold(janeen) and Shocked(janeen) and forall x (Unsold(x) and Shocked(x) -> Flock(x, tandi)) -> therefore Flock(janeen, tandi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The pennie retire the henka. The pennie is individual. The pennie is steaming. The pennie is unrelaxed. The pennie is catkinate. The pennie ruff the henka. The pennie downgrade the henka. The henka retire the pennie. The henka is steaming. The henka is unrelaxed. If something ruff the henka then it downgrade the henka. If something is individual and it downgrade the pennie then it ruff the henka. If something retire the pennie then it is liquified. If something is liquified and it retire the pennie then it ruff the henka. If something retire the pennie then the pennie ruff the henka. If something retire the pennie then it is steaming. If something ruff the henka and it is liquified then it ruff the pennie. If something is steaming and liquified then it ruff the pennie. The henka does not like the pennie.", "logic": "\nRetire(pennie, henka)\nIndividual(pennie)\nSteaming(pennie)\nUnrelaxed(pennie)\nCatkinate(pennie)\nRuff(pennie, henka)\nDowngrade(pennie, henka)\nRetire(henka, pennie)\nSteaming(henka)\nUnrelaxed(henka)\nforall x (Ruff(x, henka) -> Downgrade(x, henka))\nforall x (Individual(x) and Downgrade(x, pennie) -> Ruff(x, henka))\nforall x (Retire(x, pennie) -> Liquified(x))\nforall x (Liquified(x) and Retire(x, pennie) -> Ruff(x, henka))\nforall x (Retire(x, pennie) -> Ruff(pennie, henka))\nforall x (Retire(x, pennie) -> Steaming(x))\nforall x (Ruff(x, henka) and Liquified(x) -> Ruff(x, pennie))\nforall x (Steaming(x) and Liquified(x) -> Ruff(x, pennie))\n\nnot Ruff(henka, pennie)\n\nRetire(henka, pennie) and forall x (Retire(x, pennie) -> Liquified(x)) -> therefore Liquified(henka) Steaming(henka) and Liquified(henka) and forall x (Steaming(x) and Liquified(x) -> Ruff(x, pennie)) -> therefore Ruff(henka, pennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The queada ascertain the enrica. The queada is reflex. The queada is shaven. The queada is snuff. The queada is wedded. The queada vellicate the enrica. The queada egotrip the enrica. The enrica ascertain the queada. The enrica is shaven. The enrica is snuff. If something vellicate the enrica then it egotrip the enrica. If something is reflex and it egotrip the queada then it vellicate the enrica. If something ascertain the queada then it is arenaceous. If something is arenaceous and it ascertain the queada then it vellicate the enrica. If something ascertain the queada then the queada vellicate the enrica. If something ascertain the queada then it is shaven. If something vellicate the enrica and it is arenaceous then it vellicate the queada. If something is shaven and arenaceous then it vellicate the queada. The enrica egotrip the enrica.", "logic": "\nAscertain(queada, enrica)\nReflex(queada)\nShaven(queada)\nSnuff(queada)\nWedded(queada)\nVellicate(queada, enrica)\nEgotrip(queada, enrica)\nAscertain(enrica, queada)\nShaven(enrica)\nSnuff(enrica)\nforall x (Vellicate(x, enrica) -> Egotrip(x, enrica))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Egotrip(x, queada) -> Vellicate(x, enrica))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, queada) -> Arenaceous(x))\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) and Ascertain(x, queada) -> Vellicate(x, enrica))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, queada) -> Vellicate(queada, enrica))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, queada) -> Shaven(x))\nforall x (Vellicate(x, enrica) and Arenaceous(x) -> Vellicate(x, queada))\nforall x (Shaven(x) and Arenaceous(x) -> Vellicate(x, queada))\n\nEgotrip(enrica, enrica)\n\nAscertain(enrica, queada) and forall x (Ascertain(x, queada) -> Arenaceous(x)) -> therefore Arenaceous(enrica) Arenaceous(enrica) and Ascertain(enrica, queada) and forall x (Arenaceous(x) and Ascertain(x, queada) -> Vellicate(x, enrica)) -> therefore Vellicate(enrica, enrica) Vellicate(enrica, enrica) and forall x (Vellicate(x, enrica) -> Egotrip(x, enrica)) -> therefore Egotrip(enrica, enrica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The hal compare the peter. The hal is aslope. The hal is bullate. The hal is fake. The hal is unusual. The hal warm the peter. The hal titter the peter. The peter compare the hal. The peter is bullate. The peter is fake. If something warm the peter then it titter the peter. If something is aslope and it titter the hal then it warm the peter. If something compare the hal then it is clinquant. If something is clinquant and it compare the hal then it warm the peter. If something compare the hal then the hal warm the peter. If something compare the hal then it is bullate. If something warm the peter and it is clinquant then it warm the hal. If something is bullate and clinquant then it warm the hal. The peter does not need the peter.", "logic": "\nCompare(hal, peter)\nAslope(hal)\nBullate(hal)\nFake(hal)\nUnusual(hal)\nWarm(hal, peter)\nTitter(hal, peter)\nCompare(peter, hal)\nBullate(peter)\nFake(peter)\nforall x (Warm(x, peter) -> Titter(x, peter))\nforall x (Aslope(x) and Titter(x, hal) -> Warm(x, peter))\nforall x (Compare(x, hal) -> Clinquant(x))\nforall x (Clinquant(x) and Compare(x, hal) -> Warm(x, peter))\nforall x (Compare(x, hal) -> Warm(hal, peter))\nforall x (Compare(x, hal) -> Bullate(x))\nforall x (Warm(x, peter) and Clinquant(x) -> Warm(x, hal))\nforall x (Bullate(x) and Clinquant(x) -> Warm(x, hal))\n\nnot Titter(peter, peter)\n\nCompare(peter, hal) and forall x (Compare(x, hal) -> Clinquant(x)) -> therefore Clinquant(peter) Clinquant(peter) and Compare(peter, hal) and forall x (Clinquant(x) and Compare(x, hal) -> Warm(x, peter)) -> therefore Warm(peter, peter) Warm(peter, peter) and forall x (Warm(x, peter) -> Titter(x, peter)) -> therefore Titter(peter, peter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The lindsay shoal the trace. The lindsay is unlisted. The lindsay is exploited. The lindsay is ovate. The lindsay is tracked. The lindsay murk the trace. The lindsay disincline the trace. The trace shoal the lindsay. The trace is exploited. The trace is ovate. If something murk the trace then it disincline the trace. If something is unlisted and it disincline the lindsay then it murk the trace. If something shoal the lindsay then it is archaic. If something is archaic and it shoal the lindsay then it murk the trace. If something shoal the lindsay then the lindsay murk the trace. If something shoal the lindsay then it is exploited. If something murk the trace and it is archaic then it murk the lindsay. If something is exploited and archaic then it murk the lindsay. The lindsay does not like the lindsay.", "logic": "\nShoal(lindsay, trace)\nUnlisted(lindsay)\nExploited(lindsay)\nOvate(lindsay)\nTracked(lindsay)\nMurk(lindsay, trace)\nDisincline(lindsay, trace)\nShoal(trace, lindsay)\nExploited(trace)\nOvate(trace)\nforall x (Murk(x, trace) -> Disincline(x, trace))\nforall x (Unlisted(x) and Disincline(x, lindsay) -> Murk(x, trace))\nforall x (Shoal(x, lindsay) -> Archaic(x))\nforall x (Archaic(x) and Shoal(x, lindsay) -> Murk(x, trace))\nforall x (Shoal(x, lindsay) -> Murk(lindsay, trace))\nforall x (Shoal(x, lindsay) -> Exploited(x))\nforall x (Murk(x, trace) and Archaic(x) -> Murk(x, lindsay))\nforall x (Exploited(x) and Archaic(x) -> Murk(x, lindsay))\n\nnot Murk(lindsay, lindsay)\n\nforall x (Murk(x, trace) and Archaic(x) -> Murk(x, lindsay)) <- forall x (Shoal(x, lindsay) -> Archaic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The aubree conge the cele. The aubree is cackly. The aubree is sewed. The aubree is stuporous. The aubree is areolate. The aubree covet the cele. The aubree distrust the cele. The cele conge the aubree. The cele is sewed. The cele is stuporous. If something covet the cele then it distrust the cele. If something is cackly and it distrust the aubree then it covet the cele. If something conge the aubree then it is cringing. If something is cringing and it conge the aubree then it covet the cele. If something conge the aubree then the aubree covet the cele. If something conge the aubree then it is sewed. If something covet the cele and it is cringing then it covet the aubree. If something is sewed and cringing then it covet the aubree. The aubree is cringing.", "logic": "\nConge(aubree, cele)\nCackly(aubree)\nSewed(aubree)\nStuporous(aubree)\nAreolate(aubree)\nCovet(aubree, cele)\nDistrust(aubree, cele)\nConge(cele, aubree)\nSewed(cele)\nStuporous(cele)\nforall x (Covet(x, cele) -> Distrust(x, cele))\nforall x (Cackly(x) and Distrust(x, aubree) -> Covet(x, cele))\nforall x (Conge(x, aubree) -> Cringing(x))\nforall x (Cringing(x) and Conge(x, aubree) -> Covet(x, cele))\nforall x (Conge(x, aubree) -> Covet(aubree, cele))\nforall x (Conge(x, aubree) -> Sewed(x))\nforall x (Covet(x, cele) and Cringing(x) -> Covet(x, aubree))\nforall x (Sewed(x) and Cringing(x) -> Covet(x, aubree))\n\nCringing(aubree)\n\nforall x (Conge(x, aubree) -> Cringing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The shem agnize the giles. The shem is cheating. The shem is jealous. The shem is owned. The shem is flowery. The shem incise the giles. The shem sense the giles. The giles agnize the shem. The giles is jealous. The giles is owned. If something incise the giles then it sense the giles. If something is cheating and it sense the shem then it incise the giles. If something agnize the shem then it is minacious. If something is minacious and it agnize the shem then it incise the giles. If something agnize the shem then the shem incise the giles. If something agnize the shem then it is jealous. If something incise the giles and it is minacious then it incise the shem. If something is jealous and minacious then it incise the shem. The shem does not eat the shem.", "logic": "\nAgnize(shem, giles)\nCheating(shem)\nJealous(shem)\nOwned(shem)\nFlowery(shem)\nIncise(shem, giles)\nSense(shem, giles)\nAgnize(giles, shem)\nJealous(giles)\nOwned(giles)\nforall x (Incise(x, giles) -> Sense(x, giles))\nforall x (Cheating(x) and Sense(x, shem) -> Incise(x, giles))\nforall x (Agnize(x, shem) -> Minacious(x))\nforall x (Minacious(x) and Agnize(x, shem) -> Incise(x, giles))\nforall x (Agnize(x, shem) -> Incise(shem, giles))\nforall x (Agnize(x, shem) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Incise(x, giles) and Minacious(x) -> Incise(x, shem))\nforall x (Jealous(x) and Minacious(x) -> Incise(x, shem))\n\nnot Agnize(shem, shem)\n\nnot Agnize(shem, shem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The muhammad disinherit the cassi. The muhammad is bicyclic. The muhammad is anodic. The muhammad is xxxvii. The muhammad is cislunar. The muhammad wedel the cassi. The muhammad redesign the cassi. The cassi disinherit the muhammad. The cassi is anodic. The cassi is xxxvii. If something wedel the cassi then it redesign the cassi. If something is bicyclic and it redesign the muhammad then it wedel the cassi. If something disinherit the muhammad then it is heathen. If something is heathen and it disinherit the muhammad then it wedel the cassi. If something disinherit the muhammad then the muhammad wedel the cassi. If something disinherit the muhammad then it is anodic. If something wedel the cassi and it is heathen then it wedel the muhammad. If something is anodic and heathen then it wedel the muhammad. The cassi is bicyclic.", "logic": "\nDisinherit(muhammad, cassi)\nBicyclic(muhammad)\nAnodic(muhammad)\nXxxvii(muhammad)\nCislunar(muhammad)\nWedel(muhammad, cassi)\nRedesign(muhammad, cassi)\nDisinherit(cassi, muhammad)\nAnodic(cassi)\nXxxvii(cassi)\nforall x (Wedel(x, cassi) -> Redesign(x, cassi))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Redesign(x, muhammad) -> Wedel(x, cassi))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, muhammad) -> Heathen(x))\nforall x (Heathen(x) and Disinherit(x, muhammad) -> Wedel(x, cassi))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, muhammad) -> Wedel(muhammad, cassi))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, muhammad) -> Anodic(x))\nforall x (Wedel(x, cassi) and Heathen(x) -> Wedel(x, muhammad))\nforall x (Anodic(x) and Heathen(x) -> Wedel(x, muhammad))\n\nBicyclic(cassi)\n\nBicyclic(cassi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The rupert scrunch the jessalin. The rupert is asteroid. The rupert is tripping. The rupert is fugly. The rupert is astounding. The rupert satirise the jessalin. The rupert shovel the jessalin. The jessalin scrunch the rupert. The jessalin is tripping. The jessalin is fugly. If something satirise the jessalin then it shovel the jessalin. If something is asteroid and it shovel the rupert then it satirise the jessalin. If something scrunch the rupert then it is alienable. If something is alienable and it scrunch the rupert then it satirise the jessalin. If something scrunch the rupert then the rupert satirise the jessalin. If something scrunch the rupert then it is tripping. If something satirise the jessalin and it is alienable then it satirise the rupert. If something is tripping and alienable then it satirise the rupert. The jessalin does not eat the jessalin.", "logic": "\nScrunch(rupert, jessalin)\nAsteroid(rupert)\nTripping(rupert)\nFugly(rupert)\nAstounding(rupert)\nSatirise(rupert, jessalin)\nShovel(rupert, jessalin)\nScrunch(jessalin, rupert)\nTripping(jessalin)\nFugly(jessalin)\nforall x (Satirise(x, jessalin) -> Shovel(x, jessalin))\nforall x (Asteroid(x) and Shovel(x, rupert) -> Satirise(x, jessalin))\nforall x (Scrunch(x, rupert) -> Alienable(x))\nforall x (Alienable(x) and Scrunch(x, rupert) -> Satirise(x, jessalin))\nforall x (Scrunch(x, rupert) -> Satirise(rupert, jessalin))\nforall x (Scrunch(x, rupert) -> Tripping(x))\nforall x (Satirise(x, jessalin) and Alienable(x) -> Satirise(x, rupert))\nforall x (Tripping(x) and Alienable(x) -> Satirise(x, rupert))\n\nnot Scrunch(jessalin, jessalin)\n\nnot Scrunch(jessalin, jessalin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The keslie hone the jorrie. The keslie is chummy. The keslie is clitoral. The keslie is bighearted. The keslie is ideal. The keslie evade the jorrie. The keslie inclose the jorrie. The jorrie hone the keslie. The jorrie is clitoral. The jorrie is bighearted. If something evade the jorrie then it inclose the jorrie. If something is chummy and it inclose the keslie then it evade the jorrie. If something hone the keslie then it is gross. If something is gross and it hone the keslie then it evade the jorrie. If something hone the keslie then the keslie evade the jorrie. If something hone the keslie then it is clitoral. If something evade the jorrie and it is gross then it evade the keslie. If something is clitoral and gross then it evade the keslie. The jorrie inclose the keslie.", "logic": "\nHone(keslie, jorrie)\nChummy(keslie)\nClitoral(keslie)\nBighearted(keslie)\nIdeal(keslie)\nEvade(keslie, jorrie)\nInclose(keslie, jorrie)\nHone(jorrie, keslie)\nClitoral(jorrie)\nBighearted(jorrie)\nforall x (Evade(x, jorrie) -> Inclose(x, jorrie))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and Inclose(x, keslie) -> Evade(x, jorrie))\nforall x (Hone(x, keslie) -> Gross(x))\nforall x (Gross(x) and Hone(x, keslie) -> Evade(x, jorrie))\nforall x (Hone(x, keslie) -> Evade(keslie, jorrie))\nforall x (Hone(x, keslie) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Evade(x, jorrie) and Gross(x) -> Evade(x, keslie))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) and Gross(x) -> Evade(x, keslie))\n\nInclose(jorrie, keslie)\n\nInclose(jorrie, keslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The mariette charleston the emmet. The mariette is chestnut. The mariette is endovenous. The mariette is parented. The mariette is eristical. The mariette perjure the emmet. The mariette worry the emmet. The emmet charleston the mariette. The emmet is endovenous. The emmet is parented. If something perjure the emmet then it worry the emmet. If something is chestnut and it worry the mariette then it perjure the emmet. If something charleston the mariette then it is imposing. If something is imposing and it charleston the mariette then it perjure the emmet. If something charleston the mariette then the mariette perjure the emmet. If something charleston the mariette then it is endovenous. If something perjure the emmet and it is imposing then it perjure the mariette. If something is endovenous and imposing then it perjure the mariette. The mariette does not need the mariette.", "logic": "\nCharleston(mariette, emmet)\nChestnut(mariette)\nEndovenous(mariette)\nParented(mariette)\nEristical(mariette)\nPerjure(mariette, emmet)\nWorry(mariette, emmet)\nCharleston(emmet, mariette)\nEndovenous(emmet)\nParented(emmet)\nforall x (Perjure(x, emmet) -> Worry(x, emmet))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) and Worry(x, mariette) -> Perjure(x, emmet))\nforall x (Charleston(x, mariette) -> Imposing(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) and Charleston(x, mariette) -> Perjure(x, emmet))\nforall x (Charleston(x, mariette) -> Perjure(mariette, emmet))\nforall x (Charleston(x, mariette) -> Endovenous(x))\nforall x (Perjure(x, emmet) and Imposing(x) -> Perjure(x, mariette))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Imposing(x) -> Perjure(x, mariette))\n\nnot Worry(mariette, mariette)\n\nnot Worry(mariette, mariette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "The biff yelp the vanny. The biff is callable. The biff is fineable. The biff is teachable. The biff is depilous. The biff frap the vanny. The biff westernize the vanny. The vanny yelp the biff. The vanny is fineable. The vanny is teachable. If something frap the vanny then it westernize the vanny. If something is callable and it westernize the biff then it frap the vanny. If something yelp the biff then it is spattered. If something is spattered and it yelp the biff then it frap the vanny. If something yelp the biff then the biff frap the vanny. If something yelp the biff then it is fineable. If something frap the vanny and it is spattered then it frap the biff. If something is fineable and spattered then it frap the biff. The vanny is depilous.", "logic": "\nYelp(biff, vanny)\nCallable(biff)\nFineable(biff)\nTeachable(biff)\nDepilous(biff)\nFrap(biff, vanny)\nWesternize(biff, vanny)\nYelp(vanny, biff)\nFineable(vanny)\nTeachable(vanny)\nforall x (Frap(x, vanny) -> Westernize(x, vanny))\nforall x (Callable(x) and Westernize(x, biff) -> Frap(x, vanny))\nforall x (Yelp(x, biff) -> Spattered(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) and Yelp(x, biff) -> Frap(x, vanny))\nforall x (Yelp(x, biff) -> Frap(biff, vanny))\nforall x (Yelp(x, biff) -> Fineable(x))\nforall x (Frap(x, vanny) and Spattered(x) -> Frap(x, biff))\nforall x (Fineable(x) and Spattered(x) -> Frap(x, biff))\n\nDepilous(vanny)\n\nDepilous(vanny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-22"} {"premises": "Mel is silvern. Mel is silklike. Mel is miserly. Mel is antitypic. Mel is uninitiate. Mel is ruby. Mel is allergenic. Kind people are antitypic. If someone is ruby and antitypic then they are silklike. Rough, allergenic people are miserly. If someone is allergenic and silvern then they are uninitiate. Big, silklike people are ruby. All ruby, antitypic people are silklike. Mel is antitypic.", "logic": "\nSilvern(mel)\nSilklike(mel)\nMiserly(mel)\nAntitypic(mel)\nUninitiate(mel)\nRuby(mel)\nAllergenic(mel)\nforall x (Miserly(x) -> Antitypic(x))\nforall x (Ruby(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) and Allergenic(x) -> Miserly(x))\nforall x (Allergenic(x) and Silvern(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) and Silklike(x) -> Ruby(x))\nforall x (Ruby(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Silklike(x))\n\nAntitypic(mel)\n\ntherefore Antitypic(mel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1191"} {"premises": "Dew is notional. Dew is upward. Dew is virginal. Dew is trihydroxy. Dew is tonguelike. Dew is squamulose. Dew is ethiopian. Kind people are trihydroxy. If someone is squamulose and trihydroxy then they are upward. Rough, ethiopian people are virginal. If someone is ethiopian and notional then they are tonguelike. Big, upward people are squamulose. All squamulose, trihydroxy people are upward. Dew is not tonguelike.", "logic": "\nNotional(dew)\nUpward(dew)\nVirginal(dew)\nTrihydroxy(dew)\nTonguelike(dew)\nSquamulose(dew)\nEthiopian(dew)\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Trihydroxy(x))\nforall x (Squamulose(x) and Trihydroxy(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) and Ethiopian(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) and Notional(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Notional(x) and Upward(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Squamulose(x) and Trihydroxy(x) -> Upward(x))\n\nnot Tonguelike(dew)\n\ntherefore Tonguelike(dew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1191"} {"premises": "The katrina is glimmery. The katrina heat the sollie. The katrina espouse the juditha. The juditha wrench the sollie. The juditha espouse the katrina. The juditha espouse the sollie. The sollie does not need the katrina. If someone wrench the juditha then they are ethnologic. If someone wrench the juditha and they are not mellowed then they visit the juditha. If someone is ethnologic then they do not visit the sollie. If someone wrench the katrina and they are glimmery then they need the juditha. If someone heat the sollie then they need the juditha. If the sollie wrench the katrina then the sollie wrench the juditha. The katrina heat the sollie.", "logic": "\nGlimmery(katrina)\nHeat(katrina, sollie)\nEspouse(katrina, juditha)\nWrench(juditha, sollie)\nEspouse(juditha, katrina)\nEspouse(juditha, sollie)\nnot Wrench(sollie, katrina)\nforall x (Wrench(x, juditha) -> Ethnologic(x))\nforall x (Wrench(x, juditha) and not Mellowed(x) -> Espouse(x, juditha))\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> not Espouse(x, sollie))\nforall x (Wrench(x, katrina) and Glimmery(x) -> Wrench(x, juditha))\nforall x (Heat(x, sollie) -> Wrench(x, juditha))\nWrench(sollie, katrina) -> Wrench(sollie, juditha)\n\nHeat(katrina, sollie)\n\ntherefore Heat(katrina, sollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The lennie is biaural. The lennie mince the iggy. The lennie thud the daryl. The daryl brace the iggy. The daryl thud the lennie. The daryl thud the iggy. The iggy does not need the lennie. If someone brace the daryl then they are dowered. If someone brace the daryl and they are not whole then they visit the daryl. If someone is dowered then they do not visit the iggy. If someone brace the lennie and they are biaural then they need the daryl. If someone mince the iggy then they need the daryl. If the iggy brace the lennie then the iggy brace the daryl. The daryl does not visit the lennie.", "logic": "\nBiaural(lennie)\nMince(lennie, iggy)\nThud(lennie, daryl)\nBrace(daryl, iggy)\nThud(daryl, lennie)\nThud(daryl, iggy)\nnot Brace(iggy, lennie)\nforall x (Brace(x, daryl) -> Dowered(x))\nforall x (Brace(x, daryl) and not Whole(x) -> Thud(x, daryl))\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> not Thud(x, iggy))\nforall x (Brace(x, lennie) and Biaural(x) -> Brace(x, daryl))\nforall x (Mince(x, iggy) -> Brace(x, daryl))\nBrace(iggy, lennie) -> Brace(iggy, daryl)\n\nnot Thud(daryl, lennie)\n\ntherefore Thud(daryl, lennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The marchelle is unbolted. The marchelle captivate the aphrodite. The marchelle tamper the alexi. The alexi disobey the aphrodite. The alexi tamper the marchelle. The alexi tamper the aphrodite. The aphrodite does not need the marchelle. If someone disobey the alexi then they are slight. If someone disobey the alexi and they are not monolithic then they visit the alexi. If someone is slight then they do not visit the aphrodite. If someone disobey the marchelle and they are unbolted then they need the alexi. If someone captivate the aphrodite then they need the alexi. If the aphrodite disobey the marchelle then the aphrodite disobey the alexi. The marchelle disobey the alexi.", "logic": "\nUnbolted(marchelle)\nCaptivate(marchelle, aphrodite)\nTamper(marchelle, alexi)\nDisobey(alexi, aphrodite)\nTamper(alexi, marchelle)\nTamper(alexi, aphrodite)\nnot Disobey(aphrodite, marchelle)\nforall x (Disobey(x, alexi) -> Slight(x))\nforall x (Disobey(x, alexi) and not Monolithic(x) -> Tamper(x, alexi))\nforall x (Slight(x) -> not Tamper(x, aphrodite))\nforall x (Disobey(x, marchelle) and Unbolted(x) -> Disobey(x, alexi))\nforall x (Captivate(x, aphrodite) -> Disobey(x, alexi))\nDisobey(aphrodite, marchelle) -> Disobey(aphrodite, alexi)\n\nDisobey(marchelle, alexi)\n\nCaptivate(marchelle, aphrodite) and forall x (Captivate(x, aphrodite) -> Disobey(x, alexi)) -> therefore Disobey(marchelle, alexi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The lorelei is lapidary. The lorelei chondrify the elisa. The lorelei outstay the tella. The tella airbrush the elisa. The tella outstay the lorelei. The tella outstay the elisa. The elisa does not need the lorelei. If someone airbrush the tella then they are throwback. If someone airbrush the tella and they are not taped then they visit the tella. If someone is throwback then they do not visit the elisa. If someone airbrush the lorelei and they are lapidary then they need the tella. If someone chondrify the elisa then they need the tella. If the elisa airbrush the lorelei then the elisa airbrush the tella. The lorelei does not need the tella.", "logic": "\nLapidary(lorelei)\nChondrify(lorelei, elisa)\nOutstay(lorelei, tella)\nAirbrush(tella, elisa)\nOutstay(tella, lorelei)\nOutstay(tella, elisa)\nnot Airbrush(elisa, lorelei)\nforall x (Airbrush(x, tella) -> Throwback(x))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, tella) and not Taped(x) -> Outstay(x, tella))\nforall x (Throwback(x) -> not Outstay(x, elisa))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, lorelei) and Lapidary(x) -> Airbrush(x, tella))\nforall x (Chondrify(x, elisa) -> Airbrush(x, tella))\nAirbrush(elisa, lorelei) -> Airbrush(elisa, tella)\n\nnot Airbrush(lorelei, tella)\n\nChondrify(lorelei, elisa) and forall x (Chondrify(x, elisa) -> Airbrush(x, tella)) -> therefore Airbrush(lorelei, tella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The micky is dishy. The micky bandy the jelene. The micky attain the aime. The aime uglify the jelene. The aime attain the micky. The aime attain the jelene. The jelene does not need the micky. If someone uglify the aime then they are intimate. If someone uglify the aime and they are not sardonic then they visit the aime. If someone is intimate then they do not visit the jelene. If someone uglify the micky and they are dishy then they need the aime. If someone bandy the jelene then they need the aime. If the jelene uglify the micky then the jelene uglify the aime. The micky is intimate.", "logic": "\nDishy(micky)\nBandy(micky, jelene)\nAttain(micky, aime)\nUglify(aime, jelene)\nAttain(aime, micky)\nAttain(aime, jelene)\nnot Uglify(jelene, micky)\nforall x (Uglify(x, aime) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Uglify(x, aime) and not Sardonic(x) -> Attain(x, aime))\nforall x (Intimate(x) -> not Attain(x, jelene))\nforall x (Uglify(x, micky) and Dishy(x) -> Uglify(x, aime))\nforall x (Bandy(x, jelene) -> Uglify(x, aime))\nUglify(jelene, micky) -> Uglify(jelene, aime)\n\nIntimate(micky)\n\nBandy(micky, jelene) and forall x (Bandy(x, jelene) -> Uglify(x, aime)) -> therefore Uglify(micky, aime) Uglify(micky, aime) and forall x (Uglify(x, aime) -> Intimate(x)) -> therefore Intimate(micky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The giralda is juicy. The giralda uglify the mellisa. The giralda rent the pearle. The pearle describe the mellisa. The pearle rent the giralda. The pearle rent the mellisa. The mellisa does not need the giralda. If someone describe the pearle then they are neonatal. If someone describe the pearle and they are not unspoilt then they visit the pearle. If someone is neonatal then they do not visit the mellisa. If someone describe the giralda and they are juicy then they need the pearle. If someone uglify the mellisa then they need the pearle. If the mellisa describe the giralda then the mellisa describe the pearle. The giralda is not neonatal.", "logic": "\nJuicy(giralda)\nUglify(giralda, mellisa)\nRent(giralda, pearle)\nDescribe(pearle, mellisa)\nRent(pearle, giralda)\nRent(pearle, mellisa)\nnot Describe(mellisa, giralda)\nforall x (Describe(x, pearle) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Describe(x, pearle) and not Unspoilt(x) -> Rent(x, pearle))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> not Rent(x, mellisa))\nforall x (Describe(x, giralda) and Juicy(x) -> Describe(x, pearle))\nforall x (Uglify(x, mellisa) -> Describe(x, pearle))\nDescribe(mellisa, giralda) -> Describe(mellisa, pearle)\n\nnot Neonatal(giralda)\n\nUglify(giralda, mellisa) and forall x (Uglify(x, mellisa) -> Describe(x, pearle)) -> therefore Describe(giralda, pearle) Describe(giralda, pearle) and forall x (Describe(x, pearle) -> Neonatal(x)) -> therefore Neonatal(giralda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The corrina is judgmental. The corrina lionise the cindi. The corrina forward the bradly. The bradly marcel the cindi. The bradly forward the corrina. The bradly forward the cindi. The cindi does not need the corrina. If someone marcel the bradly then they are mandean. If someone marcel the bradly and they are not second then they visit the bradly. If someone is mandean then they do not visit the cindi. If someone marcel the corrina and they are judgmental then they need the bradly. If someone lionise the cindi then they need the bradly. If the cindi marcel the corrina then the cindi marcel the bradly. The corrina does not visit the cindi.", "logic": "\nJudgmental(corrina)\nLionise(corrina, cindi)\nForward(corrina, bradly)\nMarcel(bradly, cindi)\nForward(bradly, corrina)\nForward(bradly, cindi)\nnot Marcel(cindi, corrina)\nforall x (Marcel(x, bradly) -> Mandean(x))\nforall x (Marcel(x, bradly) and not Second(x) -> Forward(x, bradly))\nforall x (Mandean(x) -> not Forward(x, cindi))\nforall x (Marcel(x, corrina) and Judgmental(x) -> Marcel(x, bradly))\nforall x (Lionise(x, cindi) -> Marcel(x, bradly))\nMarcel(cindi, corrina) -> Marcel(cindi, bradly)\n\nnot Forward(corrina, cindi)\n\nLionise(corrina, cindi) and forall x (Lionise(x, cindi) -> Marcel(x, bradly)) -> therefore Marcel(corrina, bradly) Marcel(corrina, bradly) and forall x (Marcel(x, bradly) -> Mandean(x)) -> therefore Mandean(corrina) Mandean(corrina) and forall x (Mandean(x) -> not Forward(x, cindi)) -> therefore not Forward(corrina, cindi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The pauly is fewer. The pauly dribble the mallissa. The pauly etch the rab. The rab taper the mallissa. The rab etch the pauly. The rab etch the mallissa. The mallissa does not need the pauly. If someone taper the rab then they are voltaic. If someone taper the rab and they are not addicted then they visit the rab. If someone is voltaic then they do not visit the mallissa. If someone taper the pauly and they are fewer then they need the rab. If someone dribble the mallissa then they need the rab. If the mallissa taper the pauly then the mallissa taper the rab. The pauly etch the mallissa.", "logic": "\nFewer(pauly)\nDribble(pauly, mallissa)\nEtch(pauly, rab)\nTaper(rab, mallissa)\nEtch(rab, pauly)\nEtch(rab, mallissa)\nnot Taper(mallissa, pauly)\nforall x (Taper(x, rab) -> Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Taper(x, rab) and not Addicted(x) -> Etch(x, rab))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) -> not Etch(x, mallissa))\nforall x (Taper(x, pauly) and Fewer(x) -> Taper(x, rab))\nforall x (Dribble(x, mallissa) -> Taper(x, rab))\nTaper(mallissa, pauly) -> Taper(mallissa, rab)\n\nEtch(pauly, mallissa)\n\nDribble(pauly, mallissa) and forall x (Dribble(x, mallissa) -> Taper(x, rab)) -> therefore Taper(pauly, rab) Taper(pauly, rab) and forall x (Taper(x, rab) -> Voltaic(x)) -> therefore Voltaic(pauly) Voltaic(pauly) and forall x (Voltaic(x) -> not Etch(x, mallissa)) -> therefore not Etch(pauly, mallissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The kris is allegiant. The kris prerecord the andrew. The kris introduce the lindy. The lindy scuff the andrew. The lindy introduce the kris. The lindy introduce the andrew. The andrew does not need the kris. If someone scuff the lindy then they are piddling. If someone scuff the lindy and they are not torulose then they visit the lindy. If someone is piddling then they do not visit the andrew. If someone scuff the kris and they are allegiant then they need the lindy. If someone prerecord the andrew then they need the lindy. If the andrew scuff the kris then the andrew scuff the lindy. The lindy does not need the lindy.", "logic": "\nAllegiant(kris)\nPrerecord(kris, andrew)\nIntroduce(kris, lindy)\nScuff(lindy, andrew)\nIntroduce(lindy, kris)\nIntroduce(lindy, andrew)\nnot Scuff(andrew, kris)\nforall x (Scuff(x, lindy) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Scuff(x, lindy) and not Torulose(x) -> Introduce(x, lindy))\nforall x (Piddling(x) -> not Introduce(x, andrew))\nforall x (Scuff(x, kris) and Allegiant(x) -> Scuff(x, lindy))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, andrew) -> Scuff(x, lindy))\nScuff(andrew, kris) -> Scuff(andrew, lindy)\n\nnot Scuff(lindy, lindy)\n\nforall x (Scuff(x, kris) and Allegiant(x) -> Scuff(x, lindy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The wakefield is fourscore. The wakefield intrust the melonie. The wakefield spin the fidela. The fidela camouflage the melonie. The fidela spin the wakefield. The fidela spin the melonie. The melonie does not need the wakefield. If someone camouflage the fidela then they are attempted. If someone camouflage the fidela and they are not sorry then they visit the fidela. If someone is attempted then they do not visit the melonie. If someone camouflage the wakefield and they are fourscore then they need the fidela. If someone intrust the melonie then they need the fidela. If the melonie camouflage the wakefield then the melonie camouflage the fidela. The melonie spin the fidela.", "logic": "\nFourscore(wakefield)\nIntrust(wakefield, melonie)\nSpin(wakefield, fidela)\nCamouflage(fidela, melonie)\nSpin(fidela, wakefield)\nSpin(fidela, melonie)\nnot Camouflage(melonie, wakefield)\nforall x (Camouflage(x, fidela) -> Attempted(x))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, fidela) and not Sorry(x) -> Spin(x, fidela))\nforall x (Attempted(x) -> not Spin(x, melonie))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, wakefield) and Fourscore(x) -> Camouflage(x, fidela))\nforall x (Intrust(x, melonie) -> Camouflage(x, fidela))\nCamouflage(melonie, wakefield) -> Camouflage(melonie, fidela)\n\nSpin(melonie, fidela)\n\nforall x (Camouflage(x, fidela) and not Sorry(x) -> Spin(x, fidela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The nigel is neurologic. The nigel pore the arturo. The nigel table the sue. The sue berate the arturo. The sue table the nigel. The sue table the arturo. The arturo does not need the nigel. If someone berate the sue then they are sintered. If someone berate the sue and they are not captivated then they visit the sue. If someone is sintered then they do not visit the arturo. If someone berate the nigel and they are neurologic then they need the sue. If someone pore the arturo then they need the sue. If the arturo berate the nigel then the arturo berate the sue. The sue is not sintered.", "logic": "\nNeurologic(nigel)\nPore(nigel, arturo)\nTable(nigel, sue)\nBerate(sue, arturo)\nTable(sue, nigel)\nTable(sue, arturo)\nnot Berate(arturo, nigel)\nforall x (Berate(x, sue) -> Sintered(x))\nforall x (Berate(x, sue) and not Captivated(x) -> Table(x, sue))\nforall x (Sintered(x) -> not Table(x, arturo))\nforall x (Berate(x, nigel) and Neurologic(x) -> Berate(x, sue))\nforall x (Pore(x, arturo) -> Berate(x, sue))\nBerate(arturo, nigel) -> Berate(arturo, sue)\n\nnot Sintered(sue)\n\nforall x (Berate(x, sue) -> Sintered(x)) <- forall x (Berate(x, nigel) and Neurologic(x) -> Berate(x, sue)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The phineas is figurative. The phineas salvage the doralia. The phineas misbelieve the luelle. The luelle tunnel the doralia. The luelle misbelieve the phineas. The luelle misbelieve the doralia. The doralia does not need the phineas. If someone tunnel the luelle then they are boneheaded. If someone tunnel the luelle and they are not fruitless then they visit the luelle. If someone is boneheaded then they do not visit the doralia. If someone tunnel the phineas and they are figurative then they need the luelle. If someone salvage the doralia then they need the luelle. If the doralia tunnel the phineas then the doralia tunnel the luelle. The luelle misbelieve the luelle.", "logic": "\nFigurative(phineas)\nSalvage(phineas, doralia)\nMisbelieve(phineas, luelle)\nTunnel(luelle, doralia)\nMisbelieve(luelle, phineas)\nMisbelieve(luelle, doralia)\nnot Tunnel(doralia, phineas)\nforall x (Tunnel(x, luelle) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, luelle) and not Fruitless(x) -> Misbelieve(x, luelle))\nforall x (Boneheaded(x) -> not Misbelieve(x, doralia))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, phineas) and Figurative(x) -> Tunnel(x, luelle))\nforall x (Salvage(x, doralia) -> Tunnel(x, luelle))\nTunnel(doralia, phineas) -> Tunnel(doralia, luelle)\n\nMisbelieve(luelle, luelle)\n\nforall x (Tunnel(x, luelle) and not Fruitless(x) -> Misbelieve(x, luelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The aurie is globular. The aurie convolve the florencia. The aurie polemise the dareen. The dareen worship the florencia. The dareen polemise the aurie. The dareen polemise the florencia. The florencia does not need the aurie. If someone worship the dareen then they are assisted. If someone worship the dareen and they are not hatched then they visit the dareen. If someone is assisted then they do not visit the florencia. If someone worship the aurie and they are globular then they need the dareen. If someone convolve the florencia then they need the dareen. If the florencia worship the aurie then the florencia worship the dareen. The florencia does not visit the aurie.", "logic": "\nGlobular(aurie)\nConvolve(aurie, florencia)\nPolemise(aurie, dareen)\nWorship(dareen, florencia)\nPolemise(dareen, aurie)\nPolemise(dareen, florencia)\nnot Worship(florencia, aurie)\nforall x (Worship(x, dareen) -> Assisted(x))\nforall x (Worship(x, dareen) and not Hatched(x) -> Polemise(x, dareen))\nforall x (Assisted(x) -> not Polemise(x, florencia))\nforall x (Worship(x, aurie) and Globular(x) -> Worship(x, dareen))\nforall x (Convolve(x, florencia) -> Worship(x, dareen))\nWorship(florencia, aurie) -> Worship(florencia, dareen)\n\nnot Polemise(florencia, aurie)\n\nnot Polemise(florencia, aurie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The locke is arching. The locke mismatch the mathew. The locke shoo the harmonia. The harmonia globalize the mathew. The harmonia shoo the locke. The harmonia shoo the mathew. The mathew does not need the locke. If someone globalize the harmonia then they are evanescent. If someone globalize the harmonia and they are not insoluble then they visit the harmonia. If someone is evanescent then they do not visit the mathew. If someone globalize the locke and they are arching then they need the harmonia. If someone mismatch the mathew then they need the harmonia. If the mathew globalize the locke then the mathew globalize the harmonia. The harmonia mismatch the locke.", "logic": "\nArching(locke)\nMismatch(locke, mathew)\nShoo(locke, harmonia)\nGlobalize(harmonia, mathew)\nShoo(harmonia, locke)\nShoo(harmonia, mathew)\nnot Globalize(mathew, locke)\nforall x (Globalize(x, harmonia) -> Evanescent(x))\nforall x (Globalize(x, harmonia) and not Insoluble(x) -> Shoo(x, harmonia))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) -> not Shoo(x, mathew))\nforall x (Globalize(x, locke) and Arching(x) -> Globalize(x, harmonia))\nforall x (Mismatch(x, mathew) -> Globalize(x, harmonia))\nGlobalize(mathew, locke) -> Globalize(mathew, harmonia)\n\nMismatch(harmonia, locke)\n\nMismatch(harmonia, locke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The robin is egyptian. The robin quaff the suzie. The robin spiral the roni. The roni implant the suzie. The roni spiral the robin. The roni spiral the suzie. The suzie does not need the robin. If someone implant the roni then they are prayerful. If someone implant the roni and they are not north then they visit the roni. If someone is prayerful then they do not visit the suzie. If someone implant the robin and they are egyptian then they need the roni. If someone quaff the suzie then they need the roni. If the suzie implant the robin then the suzie implant the roni. The robin is not north.", "logic": "\nEgyptian(robin)\nQuaff(robin, suzie)\nSpiral(robin, roni)\nImplant(roni, suzie)\nSpiral(roni, robin)\nSpiral(roni, suzie)\nnot Implant(suzie, robin)\nforall x (Implant(x, roni) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Implant(x, roni) and not North(x) -> Spiral(x, roni))\nforall x (Prayerful(x) -> not Spiral(x, suzie))\nforall x (Implant(x, robin) and Egyptian(x) -> Implant(x, roni))\nforall x (Quaff(x, suzie) -> Implant(x, roni))\nImplant(suzie, robin) -> Implant(suzie, roni)\n\nnot North(robin)\n\nnot North(robin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "The mandie is agnate. The mandie string the skippie. The mandie appoint the worden. The worden cripple the skippie. The worden appoint the mandie. The worden appoint the skippie. The skippie does not need the mandie. If someone cripple the worden then they are rarefied. If someone cripple the worden and they are not spouting then they visit the worden. If someone is rarefied then they do not visit the skippie. If someone cripple the mandie and they are agnate then they need the worden. If someone string the skippie then they need the worden. If the skippie cripple the mandie then the skippie cripple the worden. The skippie string the skippie.", "logic": "\nAgnate(mandie)\nString(mandie, skippie)\nAppoint(mandie, worden)\nCripple(worden, skippie)\nAppoint(worden, mandie)\nAppoint(worden, skippie)\nnot Cripple(skippie, mandie)\nforall x (Cripple(x, worden) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Cripple(x, worden) and not Spouting(x) -> Appoint(x, worden))\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> not Appoint(x, skippie))\nforall x (Cripple(x, mandie) and Agnate(x) -> Cripple(x, worden))\nforall x (String(x, skippie) -> Cripple(x, worden))\nCripple(skippie, mandie) -> Cripple(skippie, worden)\n\nString(skippie, skippie)\n\nString(skippie, skippie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1112"} {"premises": "Leonardo is lethargic. Vivianna is wintery. Pippa is mercerized. Pippa is amused. Pippa is marbleized. Batsheva is mercerized. Batsheva is festive. All nonrandom, festive things are amused. Quiet things are wintery. All lethargic things are wintery. If something is amused and nonrandom then it is lethargic. Kind things are nonrandom. Quiet things are nonrandom. Pippa is mercerized.", "logic": "\nLethargic(leonardo)\nWintery(vivianna)\nMercerized(pippa)\nAmused(pippa)\nMarbleized(pippa)\nMercerized(batsheva)\nFestive(batsheva)\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) and Festive(x) -> Amused(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Amused(x) and Nonrandom(x) -> Lethargic(x))\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Nonrandom(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Nonrandom(x))\n\nMercerized(pippa)\n\ntherefore Mercerized(pippa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Uli is bipartizan. Immanuel is bivalved. Jacquette is hardfisted. Jacquette is overnice. Jacquette is ferric. Nathanial is hardfisted. Nathanial is absorbing. All godlike, absorbing things are overnice. Quiet things are bivalved. All bipartizan things are bivalved. If something is overnice and godlike then it is bipartizan. Kind things are godlike. Quiet things are godlike. Jacquette is not overnice.", "logic": "\nBipartizan(uli)\nBivalved(immanuel)\nHardfisted(jacquette)\nOvernice(jacquette)\nFerric(jacquette)\nHardfisted(nathanial)\nAbsorbing(nathanial)\nforall x (Godlike(x) and Absorbing(x) -> Overnice(x))\nforall x (Absorbing(x) -> Bivalved(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> Bivalved(x))\nforall x (Overnice(x) and Godlike(x) -> Bipartizan(x))\nforall x (Overnice(x) -> Godlike(x))\nforall x (Absorbing(x) -> Godlike(x))\n\nnot Overnice(jacquette)\n\ntherefore Overnice(jacquette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Elinor is ottoman. Angela is normal. Pasquale is imitative. Pasquale is cheating. Pasquale is kurdish. Paulita is imitative. Paulita is malicious. All youngish, malicious things are cheating. Quiet things are normal. All ottoman things are normal. If something is cheating and youngish then it is ottoman. Kind things are youngish. Quiet things are youngish. Paulita is youngish.", "logic": "\nOttoman(elinor)\nNormal(angela)\nImitative(pasquale)\nCheating(pasquale)\nKurdish(pasquale)\nImitative(paulita)\nMalicious(paulita)\nforall x (Youngish(x) and Malicious(x) -> Cheating(x))\nforall x (Malicious(x) -> Normal(x))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) -> Normal(x))\nforall x (Cheating(x) and Youngish(x) -> Ottoman(x))\nforall x (Cheating(x) -> Youngish(x))\nforall x (Malicious(x) -> Youngish(x))\n\nYoungish(paulita)\n\nMalicious(paulita) and forall x (Malicious(x) -> Youngish(x)) -> therefore Youngish(paulita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Alida is muciferous. Lorelle is wildcat. Lawson is anomic. Lawson is fevered. Lawson is untidy. Ezekiel is anomic. Ezekiel is thermionic. All undepicted, thermionic things are fevered. Quiet things are wildcat. All muciferous things are wildcat. If something is fevered and undepicted then it is muciferous. Kind things are undepicted. Quiet things are undepicted. Ezekiel is not wildcat.", "logic": "\nMuciferous(alida)\nWildcat(lorelle)\nAnomic(lawson)\nFevered(lawson)\nUntidy(lawson)\nAnomic(ezekiel)\nThermionic(ezekiel)\nforall x (Undepicted(x) and Thermionic(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) -> Wildcat(x))\nforall x (Muciferous(x) -> Wildcat(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) and Undepicted(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Fevered(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) -> Undepicted(x))\n\nnot Wildcat(ezekiel)\n\nThermionic(ezekiel) and forall x (Thermionic(x) -> Wildcat(x)) -> therefore Wildcat(ezekiel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Letitia is zoic. Ronna is aecial. Shaylah is accustomed. Shaylah is virtuoso. Shaylah is packed. Corabella is accustomed. Corabella is lackluster. All peripheral, lackluster things are virtuoso. Quiet things are aecial. All zoic things are aecial. If something is virtuoso and peripheral then it is zoic. Kind things are peripheral. Quiet things are peripheral. Shaylah is zoic.", "logic": "\nZoic(letitia)\nAecial(ronna)\nAccustomed(shaylah)\nVirtuoso(shaylah)\nPacked(shaylah)\nAccustomed(corabella)\nLackluster(corabella)\nforall x (Peripheral(x) and Lackluster(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Lackluster(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) and Peripheral(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nforall x (Lackluster(x) -> Peripheral(x))\n\nZoic(shaylah)\n\nVirtuoso(shaylah) and forall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Peripheral(x)) -> therefore Peripheral(shaylah) Virtuoso(shaylah) and Peripheral(shaylah) and forall x (Virtuoso(x) and Peripheral(x) -> Zoic(x)) -> therefore Zoic(shaylah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Rutledge is sanctified. Arlyne is wrapped. Randa is concluding. Randa is sweltry. Randa is homocyclic. Sasha is concluding. Sasha is buckshee. All acropetal, buckshee things are sweltry. Quiet things are wrapped. All sanctified things are wrapped. If something is sweltry and acropetal then it is sanctified. Kind things are acropetal. Quiet things are acropetal. Randa is not sanctified.", "logic": "\nSanctified(rutledge)\nWrapped(arlyne)\nConcluding(randa)\nSweltry(randa)\nHomocyclic(randa)\nConcluding(sasha)\nBuckshee(sasha)\nforall x (Acropetal(x) and Buckshee(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> Wrapped(x))\nforall x (Sanctified(x) -> Wrapped(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Acropetal(x) -> Sanctified(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) -> Acropetal(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> Acropetal(x))\n\nnot Sanctified(randa)\n\nSweltry(randa) and forall x (Sweltry(x) -> Acropetal(x)) -> therefore Acropetal(randa) Sweltry(randa) and Acropetal(randa) and forall x (Sweltry(x) and Acropetal(x) -> Sanctified(x)) -> therefore Sanctified(randa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Lucy is slapdash. Fidelia is iffy. Charlott is acarpelous. Charlott is lowered. Charlott is prompt. Daphna is acarpelous. Daphna is aghast. All scabrous, aghast things are lowered. Quiet things are iffy. All slapdash things are iffy. If something is lowered and scabrous then it is slapdash. Kind things are scabrous. Quiet things are scabrous. Daphna is slapdash.", "logic": "\nSlapdash(lucy)\nIffy(fidelia)\nAcarpelous(charlott)\nLowered(charlott)\nPrompt(charlott)\nAcarpelous(daphna)\nAghast(daphna)\nforall x (Scabrous(x) and Aghast(x) -> Lowered(x))\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Iffy(x))\nforall x (Slapdash(x) -> Iffy(x))\nforall x (Lowered(x) and Scabrous(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Lowered(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Scabrous(x))\n\nSlapdash(daphna)\n\nAghast(daphna) and forall x (Aghast(x) -> Scabrous(x)) -> therefore Scabrous(daphna) Scabrous(daphna) and Aghast(daphna) and forall x (Scabrous(x) and Aghast(x) -> Lowered(x)) -> therefore Lowered(daphna) Aghast(daphna) and forall x (Aghast(x) -> Scabrous(x)) -> therefore Scabrous(daphna) Lowered(daphna) and Scabrous(daphna) and forall x (Lowered(x) and Scabrous(x) -> Slapdash(x)) -> therefore Slapdash(daphna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Lenette is creditable. Dorine is plumlike. Mariana is exposed. Mariana is credulous. Mariana is hearty. Annetta is exposed. Annetta is tiresome. All utterable, tiresome things are credulous. Quiet things are plumlike. All creditable things are plumlike. If something is credulous and utterable then it is creditable. Kind things are utterable. Quiet things are utterable. Annetta is not creditable.", "logic": "\nCreditable(lenette)\nPlumlike(dorine)\nExposed(mariana)\nCredulous(mariana)\nHearty(mariana)\nExposed(annetta)\nTiresome(annetta)\nforall x (Utterable(x) and Tiresome(x) -> Credulous(x))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Creditable(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Credulous(x) and Utterable(x) -> Creditable(x))\nforall x (Credulous(x) -> Utterable(x))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) -> Utterable(x))\n\nnot Creditable(annetta)\n\nTiresome(annetta) and forall x (Tiresome(x) -> Utterable(x)) -> therefore Utterable(annetta) Utterable(annetta) and Tiresome(annetta) and forall x (Utterable(x) and Tiresome(x) -> Credulous(x)) -> therefore Credulous(annetta) Tiresome(annetta) and forall x (Tiresome(x) -> Utterable(x)) -> therefore Utterable(annetta) Credulous(annetta) and Utterable(annetta) and forall x (Credulous(x) and Utterable(x) -> Creditable(x)) -> therefore Creditable(annetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Carmina is preachy. Aub is alphabetic. Guillermo is credible. Guillermo is abaxial. Guillermo is proscribed. Rosalyn is credible. Rosalyn is offensive. All versed, offensive things are abaxial. Quiet things are alphabetic. All preachy things are alphabetic. If something is abaxial and versed then it is preachy. Kind things are versed. Quiet things are versed. Aub is not versed.", "logic": "\nPreachy(carmina)\nAlphabetic(aub)\nCredible(guillermo)\nAbaxial(guillermo)\nProscribed(guillermo)\nCredible(rosalyn)\nOffensive(rosalyn)\nforall x (Versed(x) and Offensive(x) -> Abaxial(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Preachy(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Abaxial(x) and Versed(x) -> Preachy(x))\nforall x (Abaxial(x) -> Versed(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Versed(x))\n\nnot Versed(aub)\n\nforall x (Abaxial(x) -> Versed(x)) <- forall x (Versed(x) and Offensive(x) -> Abaxial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Poppy is rightist. Carrissa is unexcused. Madelina is affiliated. Madelina is praiseful. Madelina is madagascan. Sansone is affiliated. Sansone is wily. All serologic, wily things are praiseful. Quiet things are unexcused. All rightist things are unexcused. If something is praiseful and serologic then it is rightist. Kind things are serologic. Quiet things are serologic. Poppy is serologic.", "logic": "\nRightist(poppy)\nUnexcused(carrissa)\nAffiliated(madelina)\nPraiseful(madelina)\nMadagascan(madelina)\nAffiliated(sansone)\nWily(sansone)\nforall x (Serologic(x) and Wily(x) -> Praiseful(x))\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Rightist(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Praiseful(x) and Serologic(x) -> Rightist(x))\nforall x (Praiseful(x) -> Serologic(x))\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Serologic(x))\n\nSerologic(poppy)\n\nforall x (Praiseful(x) -> Serologic(x)) <- forall x (Serologic(x) and Wily(x) -> Praiseful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Thedrick is gravelly. Merilee is unchanged. Janel is sensory. Janel is felted. Janel is inevitable. Dynah is sensory. Dynah is triumphal. All engrossed, triumphal things are felted. Quiet things are unchanged. All gravelly things are unchanged. If something is felted and engrossed then it is gravelly. Kind things are engrossed. Quiet things are engrossed. Merilee is not felted.", "logic": "\nGravelly(thedrick)\nUnchanged(merilee)\nSensory(janel)\nFelted(janel)\nInevitable(janel)\nSensory(dynah)\nTriumphal(dynah)\nforall x (Engrossed(x) and Triumphal(x) -> Felted(x))\nforall x (Triumphal(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Unchanged(x))\nforall x (Felted(x) and Engrossed(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Felted(x) -> Engrossed(x))\nforall x (Triumphal(x) -> Engrossed(x))\n\nnot Felted(merilee)\n\nforall x (Engrossed(x) and Triumphal(x) -> Felted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Sidonia is unwitting. Fernande is bored. Evangelia is restive. Evangelia is fearsome. Evangelia is further. Jedediah is restive. Jedediah is boracic. All blessed, boracic things are fearsome. Quiet things are bored. All unwitting things are bored. If something is fearsome and blessed then it is unwitting. Kind things are blessed. Quiet things are blessed. Fernande is unwitting.", "logic": "\nUnwitting(sidonia)\nBored(fernande)\nRestive(evangelia)\nFearsome(evangelia)\nFurther(evangelia)\nRestive(jedediah)\nBoracic(jedediah)\nforall x (Blessed(x) and Boracic(x) -> Fearsome(x))\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Unwitting(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) and Blessed(x) -> Unwitting(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Blessed(x))\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Blessed(x))\n\nUnwitting(fernande)\n\nforall x (Fearsome(x) and Blessed(x) -> Unwitting(x)) <- forall x (Blessed(x) and Boracic(x) -> Fearsome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Loraine is treeless. Norean is effectual. Candis is asocial. Candis is entozoic. Candis is unnerved. Thad is asocial. Thad is sharp. All tartaric, sharp things are entozoic. Quiet things are effectual. All treeless things are effectual. If something is entozoic and tartaric then it is treeless. Kind things are tartaric. Quiet things are tartaric. Loraine is not sharp.", "logic": "\nTreeless(loraine)\nEffectual(norean)\nAsocial(candis)\nEntozoic(candis)\nUnnerved(candis)\nAsocial(thad)\nSharp(thad)\nforall x (Tartaric(x) and Sharp(x) -> Entozoic(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Effectual(x))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Effectual(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) and Tartaric(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Entozoic(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Tartaric(x))\n\nnot Sharp(loraine)\n\nnot Sharp(loraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Veriee is egotistic. Selle is refractive. Philipa is varied. Philipa is azygos. Philipa is thirteenth. Trixy is varied. Trixy is said. All unbitter, said things are azygos. Quiet things are refractive. All egotistic things are refractive. If something is azygos and unbitter then it is egotistic. Kind things are unbitter. Quiet things are unbitter. Veriee is varied.", "logic": "\nEgotistic(veriee)\nRefractive(selle)\nVaried(philipa)\nAzygos(philipa)\nThirteenth(philipa)\nVaried(trixy)\nSaid(trixy)\nforall x (Unbitter(x) and Said(x) -> Azygos(x))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Egotistic(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Azygos(x) and Unbitter(x) -> Egotistic(x))\nforall x (Azygos(x) -> Unbitter(x))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Unbitter(x))\n\nVaried(veriee)\n\nVaried(veriee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Abdul is master. Hellene is inapposite. Stevy is hind. Stevy is neat. Stevy is rabid. Valry is hind. Valry is teetotal. All broken, teetotal things are neat. Quiet things are inapposite. All master things are inapposite. If something is neat and broken then it is master. Kind things are broken. Quiet things are broken. Stevy is not teetotal.", "logic": "\nMaster(abdul)\nInapposite(hellene)\nHind(stevy)\nNeat(stevy)\nRabid(stevy)\nHind(valry)\nTeetotal(valry)\nforall x (Broken(x) and Teetotal(x) -> Neat(x))\nforall x (Teetotal(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Master(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Neat(x) and Broken(x) -> Master(x))\nforall x (Neat(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Teetotal(x) -> Broken(x))\n\nnot Teetotal(stevy)\n\nnot Teetotal(stevy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "Davis is passing. Halvard is dismaying. Purcell is alright. Purcell is citrous. Purcell is dynamic. Viola is alright. Viola is flinty. All egocentric, flinty things are citrous. Quiet things are dismaying. All passing things are dismaying. If something is citrous and egocentric then it is passing. Kind things are egocentric. Quiet things are egocentric. Viola is dynamic.", "logic": "\nPassing(davis)\nDismaying(halvard)\nAlright(purcell)\nCitrous(purcell)\nDynamic(purcell)\nAlright(viola)\nFlinty(viola)\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and Flinty(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Dismaying(x))\nforall x (Passing(x) -> Dismaying(x))\nforall x (Citrous(x) and Egocentric(x) -> Passing(x))\nforall x (Citrous(x) -> Egocentric(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Egocentric(x))\n\nDynamic(viola)\n\nDynamic(viola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1140"} {"premises": "The roseann powwow the elie. The dean is metallike. The dean cannulize the nick. The nick figure the roseann. The nick figure the dean. The nick does not like the elie. The elie is carsick. The elie is abducting. The elie figure the dean. The elie figure the nick. If someone figure the elie and they are not abducting then they are not carsick. The nick figure the roseann.", "logic": "\nPowwow(roseann, elie)\nMetallike(dean)\nCannulize(dean, nick)\nFigure(nick, roseann)\nFigure(nick, dean)\nnot Figure(nick, elie)\nCarsick(elie)\nAbducting(elie)\nFigure(elie, dean)\nFigure(elie, nick)\nforall x (Figure(x, elie) and not Abducting(x) -> not Carsick(x))\n\nFigure(nick, roseann)\n\ntherefore Figure(nick, roseann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2385"} {"premises": "The selig metal the milo. The legra is filled. The legra venerate the joyce. The joyce concert the selig. The joyce concert the legra. The joyce does not like the milo. The milo is tipped. The milo is defamatory. The milo concert the legra. The milo concert the joyce. If someone concert the milo and they are not defamatory then they are not tipped. The joyce does not like the legra.", "logic": "\nMetal(selig, milo)\nFilled(legra)\nVenerate(legra, joyce)\nConcert(joyce, selig)\nConcert(joyce, legra)\nnot Concert(joyce, milo)\nTipped(milo)\nDefamatory(milo)\nConcert(milo, legra)\nConcert(milo, joyce)\nforall x (Concert(x, milo) and not Defamatory(x) -> not Tipped(x))\n\nnot Concert(joyce, legra)\n\ntherefore Concert(joyce, legra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2385"} {"premises": "The salomon earmark the andee. The birgitta is attached. The birgitta overhaul the malcolm. The malcolm dismiss the salomon. The malcolm dismiss the birgitta. The malcolm does not like the andee. The andee is filmed. The andee is appointed. The andee dismiss the birgitta. The andee dismiss the malcolm. If someone dismiss the andee and they are not appointed then they are not filmed. The malcolm does not need the salomon.", "logic": "\nEarmark(salomon, andee)\nAttached(birgitta)\nOverhaul(birgitta, malcolm)\nDismiss(malcolm, salomon)\nDismiss(malcolm, birgitta)\nnot Dismiss(malcolm, andee)\nFilmed(andee)\nAppointed(andee)\nDismiss(andee, birgitta)\nDismiss(andee, malcolm)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, andee) and not Appointed(x) -> not Filmed(x))\n\nnot Overhaul(malcolm, salomon)\n\nnot Overhaul(malcolm, salomon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2385"} {"premises": "The jobyna figure the malia. The esmaria is formic. The esmaria phase the jemmy. The jemmy orphan the jobyna. The jemmy orphan the esmaria. The jemmy does not like the malia. The malia is weblike. The malia is ruby. The malia orphan the esmaria. The malia orphan the jemmy. If someone orphan the malia and they are not ruby then they are not weblike. The jemmy figure the jemmy.", "logic": "\nFigure(jobyna, malia)\nFormic(esmaria)\nPhase(esmaria, jemmy)\nOrphan(jemmy, jobyna)\nOrphan(jemmy, esmaria)\nnot Orphan(jemmy, malia)\nWeblike(malia)\nRuby(malia)\nOrphan(malia, esmaria)\nOrphan(malia, jemmy)\nforall x (Orphan(x, malia) and not Ruby(x) -> not Weblike(x))\n\nFigure(jemmy, jemmy)\n\nFigure(jemmy, jemmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2385"} {"premises": "Stanley is brazilian. Stanley is fortified. Stanley is ghostlike. Stanley is insurable. Stanley is reechoing. Hortensia is brazilian. Hortensia is insurable. If something is ghostlike then it is fortified. If something is insurable then it is ghostlike. If something is swayback and ghostlike then it is fortified. All interim things are insurable. All fortified, brazilian things are swayback. All reechoing things are insurable. If something is brazilian and reechoing then it is interim. If Stanley is fortified and Stanley is swayback then Stanley is ghostlike. Stanley is brazilian.", "logic": "\nBrazilian(stanley)\nFortified(stanley)\nGhostlike(stanley)\nInsurable(stanley)\nReechoing(stanley)\nBrazilian(hortensia)\nInsurable(hortensia)\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) -> Fortified(x))\nforall x (Insurable(x) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Swayback(x) and Ghostlike(x) -> Fortified(x))\nforall x (Interim(x) -> Insurable(x))\nforall x (Fortified(x) and Brazilian(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) -> Insurable(x))\nforall x (Brazilian(x) and Reechoing(x) -> Interim(x))\nFortified(stanley) and Swayback(stanley) -> Ghostlike(stanley)\n\nBrazilian(stanley)\n\ntherefore Brazilian(stanley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Olive is unready. Olive is tardive. Olive is frightened. Olive is putative. Olive is lowbrowed. Byron is unready. Byron is putative. If something is frightened then it is tardive. If something is putative then it is frightened. If something is tomentous and frightened then it is tardive. All mongoloid things are putative. All tardive, unready things are tomentous. All lowbrowed things are putative. If something is unready and lowbrowed then it is mongoloid. If Olive is tardive and Olive is tomentous then Olive is frightened. Byron is not unready.", "logic": "\nUnready(olive)\nTardive(olive)\nFrightened(olive)\nPutative(olive)\nLowbrowed(olive)\nUnready(byron)\nPutative(byron)\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Putative(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) and Frightened(x) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Putative(x))\nforall x (Tardive(x) and Unready(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) -> Putative(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Lowbrowed(x) -> Mongoloid(x))\nTardive(olive) and Tomentous(olive) -> Frightened(olive)\n\nnot Unready(byron)\n\ntherefore Unready(byron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Johnnie is thirdhand. Johnnie is graduate. Johnnie is semisolid. Johnnie is saxicoline. Johnnie is intrastate. Caressa is thirdhand. Caressa is saxicoline. If something is semisolid then it is graduate. If something is saxicoline then it is semisolid. If something is collected and semisolid then it is graduate. All cheap things are saxicoline. All graduate, thirdhand things are collected. All intrastate things are saxicoline. If something is thirdhand and intrastate then it is cheap. If Johnnie is graduate and Johnnie is collected then Johnnie is semisolid. Johnnie is collected.", "logic": "\nThirdhand(johnnie)\nGraduate(johnnie)\nSemisolid(johnnie)\nSaxicoline(johnnie)\nIntrastate(johnnie)\nThirdhand(caressa)\nSaxicoline(caressa)\nforall x (Semisolid(x) -> Graduate(x))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Collected(x) and Semisolid(x) -> Graduate(x))\nforall x (Cheap(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nforall x (Graduate(x) and Thirdhand(x) -> Collected(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) and Intrastate(x) -> Cheap(x))\nGraduate(johnnie) and Collected(johnnie) -> Semisolid(johnnie)\n\nCollected(johnnie)\n\nGraduate(johnnie) and Thirdhand(johnnie) and forall x (Graduate(x) and Thirdhand(x) -> Collected(x)) -> therefore Collected(johnnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Judson is branchial. Judson is unlearned. Judson is caducous. Judson is disparate. Judson is upended. Andrea is branchial. Andrea is disparate. If something is caducous then it is unlearned. If something is disparate then it is caducous. If something is jamaican and caducous then it is unlearned. All unneeded things are disparate. All unlearned, branchial things are jamaican. All upended things are disparate. If something is branchial and upended then it is unneeded. If Judson is unlearned and Judson is jamaican then Judson is caducous. Judson is not unneeded.", "logic": "\nBranchial(judson)\nUnlearned(judson)\nCaducous(judson)\nDisparate(judson)\nUpended(judson)\nBranchial(andrea)\nDisparate(andrea)\nforall x (Caducous(x) -> Unlearned(x))\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Caducous(x))\nforall x (Jamaican(x) and Caducous(x) -> Unlearned(x))\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Unlearned(x) and Branchial(x) -> Jamaican(x))\nforall x (Upended(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) and Upended(x) -> Unneeded(x))\nUnlearned(judson) and Jamaican(judson) -> Caducous(judson)\n\nnot Unneeded(judson)\n\nBranchial(judson) and Upended(judson) and forall x (Branchial(x) and Upended(x) -> Unneeded(x)) -> therefore Unneeded(judson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Israel is muddied. Israel is prisonlike. Israel is zygodactyl. Israel is xviii. Israel is homy. Amalee is muddied. Amalee is xviii. If something is zygodactyl then it is prisonlike. If something is xviii then it is zygodactyl. If something is sebaceous and zygodactyl then it is prisonlike. All goaded things are xviii. All prisonlike, muddied things are sebaceous. All homy things are xviii. If something is muddied and homy then it is goaded. If Israel is prisonlike and Israel is sebaceous then Israel is zygodactyl. Amalee is prisonlike.", "logic": "\nMuddied(israel)\nPrisonlike(israel)\nZygodactyl(israel)\nXviii(israel)\nHomy(israel)\nMuddied(amalee)\nXviii(amalee)\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Xviii(x) -> Zygodactyl(x))\nforall x (Sebaceous(x) and Zygodactyl(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Goaded(x) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) and Muddied(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nforall x (Homy(x) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Muddied(x) and Homy(x) -> Goaded(x))\nPrisonlike(israel) and Sebaceous(israel) -> Zygodactyl(israel)\n\nPrisonlike(amalee)\n\nXviii(amalee) and forall x (Xviii(x) -> Zygodactyl(x)) -> therefore Zygodactyl(amalee) Zygodactyl(amalee) and forall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Prisonlike(x)) -> therefore Prisonlike(amalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Chelsea is swingy. Chelsea is stinking. Chelsea is pubic. Chelsea is unparented. Chelsea is primary. Marylou is swingy. Marylou is unparented. If something is pubic then it is stinking. If something is unparented then it is pubic. If something is adscripted and pubic then it is stinking. All pierced things are unparented. All stinking, swingy things are adscripted. All primary things are unparented. If something is swingy and primary then it is pierced. If Chelsea is stinking and Chelsea is adscripted then Chelsea is pubic. Marylou is not stinking.", "logic": "\nSwingy(chelsea)\nStinking(chelsea)\nPubic(chelsea)\nUnparented(chelsea)\nPrimary(chelsea)\nSwingy(marylou)\nUnparented(marylou)\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Stinking(x))\nforall x (Unparented(x) -> Pubic(x))\nforall x (Adscripted(x) and Pubic(x) -> Stinking(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Unparented(x))\nforall x (Stinking(x) and Swingy(x) -> Adscripted(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Unparented(x))\nforall x (Swingy(x) and Primary(x) -> Pierced(x))\nStinking(chelsea) and Adscripted(chelsea) -> Pubic(chelsea)\n\nnot Stinking(marylou)\n\nUnparented(marylou) and forall x (Unparented(x) -> Pubic(x)) -> therefore Pubic(marylou) Pubic(marylou) and forall x (Pubic(x) -> Stinking(x)) -> therefore Stinking(marylou)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Carrol is heinous. Carrol is modified. Carrol is indrawn. Carrol is unnoted. Carrol is sunken. Angela is heinous. Angela is unnoted. If something is indrawn then it is modified. If something is unnoted then it is indrawn. If something is bantu and indrawn then it is modified. All merciless things are unnoted. All modified, heinous things are bantu. All sunken things are unnoted. If something is heinous and sunken then it is merciless. If Carrol is modified and Carrol is bantu then Carrol is indrawn. Angela is bantu.", "logic": "\nHeinous(carrol)\nModified(carrol)\nIndrawn(carrol)\nUnnoted(carrol)\nSunken(carrol)\nHeinous(angela)\nUnnoted(angela)\nforall x (Indrawn(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Unnoted(x) -> Indrawn(x))\nforall x (Bantu(x) and Indrawn(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Merciless(x) -> Unnoted(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) and Heinous(x) -> Bantu(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> Unnoted(x))\nforall x (Heinous(x) and Sunken(x) -> Merciless(x))\nModified(carrol) and Bantu(carrol) -> Indrawn(carrol)\n\nBantu(angela)\n\nUnnoted(angela) and forall x (Unnoted(x) -> Indrawn(x)) -> therefore Indrawn(angela) Indrawn(angela) and forall x (Indrawn(x) -> Modified(x)) -> therefore Modified(angela) Modified(angela) and Heinous(angela) and forall x (Modified(x) and Heinous(x) -> Bantu(x)) -> therefore Bantu(angela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Masha is unuttered. Masha is secretory. Masha is unaccented. Masha is northbound. Masha is nuptial. Vivyanne is unuttered. Vivyanne is northbound. If something is unaccented then it is secretory. If something is northbound then it is unaccented. If something is crookback and unaccented then it is secretory. All aldermanic things are northbound. All secretory, unuttered things are crookback. All nuptial things are northbound. If something is unuttered and nuptial then it is aldermanic. If Masha is secretory and Masha is crookback then Masha is unaccented. Vivyanne is not crookback.", "logic": "\nUnuttered(masha)\nSecretory(masha)\nUnaccented(masha)\nNorthbound(masha)\nNuptial(masha)\nUnuttered(vivyanne)\nNorthbound(vivyanne)\nforall x (Unaccented(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Northbound(x) -> Unaccented(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) and Unaccented(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Aldermanic(x) -> Northbound(x))\nforall x (Secretory(x) and Unuttered(x) -> Crookback(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> Northbound(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) and Nuptial(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\nSecretory(masha) and Crookback(masha) -> Unaccented(masha)\n\nnot Crookback(vivyanne)\n\nNorthbound(vivyanne) and forall x (Northbound(x) -> Unaccented(x)) -> therefore Unaccented(vivyanne) Unaccented(vivyanne) and forall x (Unaccented(x) -> Secretory(x)) -> therefore Secretory(vivyanne) Secretory(vivyanne) and Unuttered(vivyanne) and forall x (Secretory(x) and Unuttered(x) -> Crookback(x)) -> therefore Crookback(vivyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Letty is abient. Letty is marauding. Letty is similar. Letty is blusterous. Letty is bareheaded. Raina is abient. Raina is blusterous. If something is similar then it is marauding. If something is blusterous then it is similar. If something is overproud and similar then it is marauding. All stressful things are blusterous. All marauding, abient things are overproud. All bareheaded things are blusterous. If something is abient and bareheaded then it is stressful. If Letty is marauding and Letty is overproud then Letty is similar. Raina is not stressful.", "logic": "\nAbient(letty)\nMarauding(letty)\nSimilar(letty)\nBlusterous(letty)\nBareheaded(letty)\nAbient(raina)\nBlusterous(raina)\nforall x (Similar(x) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Blusterous(x) -> Similar(x))\nforall x (Overproud(x) and Similar(x) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Stressful(x) -> Blusterous(x))\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Abient(x) -> Overproud(x))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) -> Blusterous(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) and Bareheaded(x) -> Stressful(x))\nMarauding(letty) and Overproud(letty) -> Similar(letty)\n\nnot Stressful(raina)\n\nforall x (Abient(x) and Bareheaded(x) -> Stressful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Felicdad is classless. Felicdad is opencut. Felicdad is infrahuman. Felicdad is disciform. Felicdad is clear. Annadiane is classless. Annadiane is disciform. If something is infrahuman then it is opencut. If something is disciform then it is infrahuman. If something is ascending and infrahuman then it is opencut. All euphonous things are disciform. All opencut, classless things are ascending. All clear things are disciform. If something is classless and clear then it is euphonous. If Felicdad is opencut and Felicdad is ascending then Felicdad is infrahuman. Annadiane is clear.", "logic": "\nClassless(felicdad)\nOpencut(felicdad)\nInfrahuman(felicdad)\nDisciform(felicdad)\nClear(felicdad)\nClassless(annadiane)\nDisciform(annadiane)\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Opencut(x))\nforall x (Disciform(x) -> Infrahuman(x))\nforall x (Ascending(x) and Infrahuman(x) -> Opencut(x))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) -> Disciform(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) and Classless(x) -> Ascending(x))\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Disciform(x))\nforall x (Classless(x) and Clear(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nOpencut(felicdad) and Ascending(felicdad) -> Infrahuman(felicdad)\n\nClear(annadiane)\n\nClear(annadiane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Maggie is steerable. Brana is not ranking. Chane is skilled. All ungarbed people are steerable. Kind people are steerable. Blue people are impelled. Kind, skilled people are impelled. If someone is ungarbed then they are wholesome. If Chane is skilled then Chane is commercial. All commercial people are ungarbed. If someone is skilled and not ungarbed then they are ranking. Brana is not ranking.", "logic": "\nSteerable(maggie)\nnot Ranking(brana)\nSkilled(chane)\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Steerable(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Steerable(x))\nforall x (Wholesome(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) and Skilled(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Wholesome(x))\nSkilled(chane) -> Commercial(chane)\nforall x (Commercial(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) and not Ungarbed(x) -> Ranking(x))\n\nnot Ranking(brana)\n\ntherefore not Ranking(brana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Josepha is detergent. Joelle is not jungly. Frannie is onymous. All thousandth people are detergent. Kind people are detergent. Blue people are unsnarled. Kind, onymous people are unsnarled. If someone is thousandth then they are meet. If Frannie is onymous then Frannie is whispered. All whispered people are thousandth. If someone is onymous and not thousandth then they are jungly. Josepha is not detergent.", "logic": "\nDetergent(josepha)\nnot Jungly(joelle)\nOnymous(frannie)\nforall x (Thousandth(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Meet(x) -> Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Onymous(x) -> Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) -> Meet(x))\nOnymous(frannie) -> Whispered(frannie)\nforall x (Whispered(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Onymous(x) and not Thousandth(x) -> Jungly(x))\n\nnot Detergent(josepha)\n\ntherefore Detergent(josepha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Rasla is asinine. Pavia is not congruent. Salli is sign. All motored people are asinine. Kind people are asinine. Blue people are clxxx. Kind, sign people are clxxx. If someone is motored then they are palatial. If Salli is sign then Salli is unmixed. All unmixed people are motored. If someone is sign and not motored then they are congruent. Salli is unmixed.", "logic": "\nAsinine(rasla)\nnot Congruent(pavia)\nSign(salli)\nforall x (Motored(x) -> Asinine(x))\nforall x (Motored(x) -> Asinine(x))\nforall x (Palatial(x) -> Clxxx(x))\nforall x (Motored(x) and Sign(x) -> Clxxx(x))\nforall x (Motored(x) -> Palatial(x))\nSign(salli) -> Unmixed(salli)\nforall x (Unmixed(x) -> Motored(x))\nforall x (Sign(x) and not Motored(x) -> Congruent(x))\n\nUnmixed(salli)\n\nSign(salli) and Sign(salli) -> Unmixed(salli) -> therefore Unmixed(salli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Rube is treeless. Nanci is not dicky. Chickie is prideful. All edgy people are treeless. Kind people are treeless. Blue people are packaged. Kind, prideful people are packaged. If someone is edgy then they are impish. If Chickie is prideful then Chickie is nauseous. All nauseous people are edgy. If someone is prideful and not edgy then they are dicky. Chickie is not nauseous.", "logic": "\nTreeless(rube)\nnot Dicky(nanci)\nPrideful(chickie)\nforall x (Edgy(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Edgy(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Impish(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Edgy(x) and Prideful(x) -> Packaged(x))\nforall x (Edgy(x) -> Impish(x))\nPrideful(chickie) -> Nauseous(chickie)\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Edgy(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) and not Edgy(x) -> Dicky(x))\n\nnot Nauseous(chickie)\n\nPrideful(chickie) and Prideful(chickie) -> Nauseous(chickie) -> therefore Nauseous(chickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Cristina is apostolic. Hewitt is not deducible. Puff is compounded. All varnished people are apostolic. Kind people are apostolic. Blue people are wolfish. Kind, compounded people are wolfish. If someone is varnished then they are subdued. If Puff is compounded then Puff is giving. All giving people are varnished. If someone is compounded and not varnished then they are deducible. Puff is varnished.", "logic": "\nApostolic(cristina)\nnot Deducible(hewitt)\nCompounded(puff)\nforall x (Varnished(x) -> Apostolic(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) -> Apostolic(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Wolfish(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) and Compounded(x) -> Wolfish(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) -> Subdued(x))\nCompounded(puff) -> Giving(puff)\nforall x (Giving(x) -> Varnished(x))\nforall x (Compounded(x) and not Varnished(x) -> Deducible(x))\n\nVarnished(puff)\n\nCompounded(puff) and Compounded(puff) -> Giving(puff) -> therefore Giving(puff) Giving(puff) and forall x (Giving(x) -> Varnished(x)) -> therefore Varnished(puff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Dorit is unattired. Davey is not astral. Kathye is deciding. All inartistic people are unattired. Kind people are unattired. Blue people are chapfallen. Kind, deciding people are chapfallen. If someone is inartistic then they are matured. If Kathye is deciding then Kathye is elemental. All elemental people are inartistic. If someone is deciding and not inartistic then they are astral. Kathye is not inartistic.", "logic": "\nUnattired(dorit)\nnot Astral(davey)\nDeciding(kathye)\nforall x (Inartistic(x) -> Unattired(x))\nforall x (Inartistic(x) -> Unattired(x))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\nforall x (Inartistic(x) and Deciding(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\nforall x (Inartistic(x) -> Matured(x))\nDeciding(kathye) -> Elemental(kathye)\nforall x (Elemental(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and not Inartistic(x) -> Astral(x))\n\nnot Inartistic(kathye)\n\nDeciding(kathye) and Deciding(kathye) -> Elemental(kathye) -> therefore Elemental(kathye) Elemental(kathye) and forall x (Elemental(x) -> Inartistic(x)) -> therefore Inartistic(kathye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Carilyn is numb. Saba is not faustian. Tuesday is sensitised. All medusoid people are numb. Kind people are numb. Blue people are cursory. Kind, sensitised people are cursory. If someone is medusoid then they are thrombosed. If Tuesday is sensitised then Tuesday is esophageal. All esophageal people are medusoid. If someone is sensitised and not medusoid then they are faustian. Tuesday is thrombosed.", "logic": "\nNumb(carilyn)\nnot Faustian(saba)\nSensitised(tuesday)\nforall x (Medusoid(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Thrombosed(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) and Sensitised(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) -> Thrombosed(x))\nSensitised(tuesday) -> Esophageal(tuesday)\nforall x (Esophageal(x) -> Medusoid(x))\nforall x (Sensitised(x) and not Medusoid(x) -> Faustian(x))\n\nThrombosed(tuesday)\n\nSensitised(tuesday) and Sensitised(tuesday) -> Esophageal(tuesday) -> therefore Esophageal(tuesday) Esophageal(tuesday) and forall x (Esophageal(x) -> Medusoid(x)) -> therefore Medusoid(tuesday) Medusoid(tuesday) and forall x (Medusoid(x) -> Thrombosed(x)) -> therefore Thrombosed(tuesday)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Laura is facile. Atlante is not virtual. Cordelia is anorthic. All dipolar people are facile. Kind people are facile. Blue people are dangerous. Kind, anorthic people are dangerous. If someone is dipolar then they are extensile. If Cordelia is anorthic then Cordelia is sulfuric. All sulfuric people are dipolar. If someone is anorthic and not dipolar then they are virtual. Cordelia is not dangerous.", "logic": "\nFacile(laura)\nnot Virtual(atlante)\nAnorthic(cordelia)\nforall x (Dipolar(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Dipolar(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Dipolar(x) and Anorthic(x) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Dipolar(x) -> Extensile(x))\nAnorthic(cordelia) -> Sulfuric(cordelia)\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Dipolar(x))\nforall x (Anorthic(x) and not Dipolar(x) -> Virtual(x))\n\nnot Dangerous(cordelia)\n\nAnorthic(cordelia) and Anorthic(cordelia) -> Sulfuric(cordelia) -> therefore Sulfuric(cordelia) Sulfuric(cordelia) and forall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Dipolar(x)) -> therefore Dipolar(cordelia) Dipolar(cordelia) and Anorthic(cordelia) and forall x (Dipolar(x) and Anorthic(x) -> Dangerous(x)) -> therefore Dangerous(cordelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Annabal is mordant. Avrom is not undated. Fidelity is hertzian. All implicated people are mordant. Kind people are mordant. Blue people are dozy. Kind, hertzian people are dozy. If someone is implicated then they are underived. If Fidelity is hertzian then Fidelity is deviate. All deviate people are implicated. If someone is hertzian and not implicated then they are undated. Avrom is not underived.", "logic": "\nMordant(annabal)\nnot Undated(avrom)\nHertzian(fidelity)\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Underived(x) -> Dozy(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Hertzian(x) -> Dozy(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Underived(x))\nHertzian(fidelity) -> Deviate(fidelity)\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Implicated(x))\nforall x (Hertzian(x) and not Implicated(x) -> Undated(x))\n\nnot Underived(avrom)\n\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Underived(x)) <- forall x (Deviate(x) -> Implicated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Del is joking. Ajay is not gratuitous. Yovonnda is illicit. All deplorable people are joking. Kind people are joking. Blue people are spoilt. Kind, illicit people are spoilt. If someone is deplorable then they are antsy. If Yovonnda is illicit then Yovonnda is corny. All corny people are deplorable. If someone is illicit and not deplorable then they are gratuitous. Yovonnda is gratuitous.", "logic": "\nJoking(del)\nnot Gratuitous(ajay)\nIllicit(yovonnda)\nforall x (Deplorable(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Deplorable(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Antsy(x) -> Spoilt(x))\nforall x (Deplorable(x) and Illicit(x) -> Spoilt(x))\nforall x (Deplorable(x) -> Antsy(x))\nIllicit(yovonnda) -> Corny(yovonnda)\nforall x (Corny(x) -> Deplorable(x))\nforall x (Illicit(x) and not Deplorable(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\n\nGratuitous(yovonnda)\n\nforall x (Illicit(x) and not Deplorable(x) -> Gratuitous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Pedro is sleety. Sybila is not idolatrous. Colly is detergent. All geothermal people are sleety. Kind people are sleety. Blue people are gossamer. Kind, detergent people are gossamer. If someone is geothermal then they are muted. If Colly is detergent then Colly is thousandth. All thousandth people are geothermal. If someone is detergent and not geothermal then they are idolatrous. Pedro is not geothermal.", "logic": "\nSleety(pedro)\nnot Idolatrous(sybila)\nDetergent(colly)\nforall x (Geothermal(x) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Geothermal(x) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Muted(x) -> Gossamer(x))\nforall x (Geothermal(x) and Detergent(x) -> Gossamer(x))\nforall x (Geothermal(x) -> Muted(x))\nDetergent(colly) -> Thousandth(colly)\nforall x (Thousandth(x) -> Geothermal(x))\nforall x (Detergent(x) and not Geothermal(x) -> Idolatrous(x))\n\nnot Geothermal(pedro)\n\nforall x (Thousandth(x) -> Geothermal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Dillon is metalloid. Theodore is not unsorted. Clyde is uniovular. All mismated people are metalloid. Kind people are metalloid. Blue people are dressy. Kind, uniovular people are dressy. If someone is mismated then they are defending. If Clyde is uniovular then Clyde is abiding. All abiding people are mismated. If someone is uniovular and not mismated then they are unsorted. Dillon is dressy.", "logic": "\nMetalloid(dillon)\nnot Unsorted(theodore)\nUniovular(clyde)\nforall x (Mismated(x) -> Metalloid(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) -> Metalloid(x))\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Dressy(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) and Uniovular(x) -> Dressy(x))\nforall x (Mismated(x) -> Defending(x))\nUniovular(clyde) -> Abiding(clyde)\nforall x (Abiding(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Uniovular(x) and not Mismated(x) -> Unsorted(x))\n\nDressy(dillon)\n\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Dressy(x)) <- forall x (Mismated(x) -> Defending(x)) <- forall x (Abiding(x) -> Mismated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Jermain is atrophied. Dorelle is not trifling. Shamit is tenderized. All terminable people are atrophied. Kind people are atrophied. Blue people are waterless. Kind, tenderized people are waterless. If someone is terminable then they are weekly. If Shamit is tenderized then Shamit is intertidal. All intertidal people are terminable. If someone is tenderized and not terminable then they are trifling. Jermain is not tenderized.", "logic": "\nAtrophied(jermain)\nnot Trifling(dorelle)\nTenderized(shamit)\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Weekly(x) -> Waterless(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) and Tenderized(x) -> Waterless(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Weekly(x))\nTenderized(shamit) -> Intertidal(shamit)\nforall x (Intertidal(x) -> Terminable(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) and not Terminable(x) -> Trifling(x))\n\nnot Tenderized(jermain)\n\nnot Tenderized(jermain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Fawne is conversant. Bert is not kechuan. Che is chordal. All lithe people are conversant. Kind people are conversant. Blue people are votive. Kind, chordal people are votive. If someone is lithe then they are calando. If Che is chordal then Che is dank. All dank people are lithe. If someone is chordal and not lithe then they are kechuan. Fawne is dank.", "logic": "\nConversant(fawne)\nnot Kechuan(bert)\nChordal(che)\nforall x (Lithe(x) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Votive(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) and Chordal(x) -> Votive(x))\nforall x (Lithe(x) -> Calando(x))\nChordal(che) -> Dank(che)\nforall x (Dank(x) -> Lithe(x))\nforall x (Chordal(x) and not Lithe(x) -> Kechuan(x))\n\nDank(fawne)\n\nDank(fawne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Waring is corrected. Jermayne is not scrimpy. Moria is fingerless. All stellate people are corrected. Kind people are corrected. Blue people are inevitable. Kind, fingerless people are inevitable. If someone is stellate then they are pursuant. If Moria is fingerless then Moria is unaware. All unaware people are stellate. If someone is fingerless and not stellate then they are scrimpy. Jermayne is not unaware.", "logic": "\nCorrected(waring)\nnot Scrimpy(jermayne)\nFingerless(moria)\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Pursuant(x) -> Inevitable(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) and Fingerless(x) -> Inevitable(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nFingerless(moria) -> Unaware(moria)\nforall x (Unaware(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Fingerless(x) and not Stellate(x) -> Scrimpy(x))\n\nnot Unaware(jermayne)\n\nnot Unaware(jermayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Maxy is dendroidal. Masha is not yogistic. Reuben is eleventh. All daedal people are dendroidal. Kind people are dendroidal. Blue people are andorran. Kind, eleventh people are andorran. If someone is daedal then they are glassed. If Reuben is eleventh then Reuben is nutritive. All nutritive people are daedal. If someone is eleventh and not daedal then they are yogistic. Masha is eleventh.", "logic": "\nDendroidal(maxy)\nnot Yogistic(masha)\nEleventh(reuben)\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Dendroidal(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Dendroidal(x))\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Andorran(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) and Eleventh(x) -> Andorran(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Glassed(x))\nEleventh(reuben) -> Nutritive(reuben)\nforall x (Nutritive(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Eleventh(x) and not Daedal(x) -> Yogistic(x))\n\nEleventh(masha)\n\nEleventh(masha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1468"} {"premises": "Frederic is not rentable. Scotti is husbandly. Nester is bluff. If something is skintight and germinal then it is rentable. If something is husbandly and rentable then it is germinal. If something is bluff then it is germinal. If something is rentable and husbandly then it is not foamy. If something is bluff then it is skintight. If Nester is germinal then Nester is husbandly. Frederic is not rentable.", "logic": "\nnot Rentable(frederic)\nHusbandly(scotti)\nBluff(nester)\nforall x (Skintight(x) and Germinal(x) -> Rentable(x))\nforall x (Husbandly(x) and Rentable(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Bluff(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Rentable(x) and Husbandly(x) -> not Foamy(x))\nforall x (Bluff(x) -> Skintight(x))\nGerminal(nester) -> Husbandly(nester)\n\nnot Rentable(frederic)\n\ntherefore not Rentable(frederic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Robinette is not anile. Kitty is nighted. Myrtia is spacious. If something is isolated and employed then it is anile. If something is nighted and anile then it is employed. If something is spacious then it is employed. If something is anile and nighted then it is not tremendous. If something is spacious then it is isolated. If Myrtia is employed then Myrtia is nighted. Robinette is anile.", "logic": "\nnot Anile(robinette)\nNighted(kitty)\nSpacious(myrtia)\nforall x (Isolated(x) and Employed(x) -> Anile(x))\nforall x (Nighted(x) and Anile(x) -> Employed(x))\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> Employed(x))\nforall x (Anile(x) and Nighted(x) -> not Tremendous(x))\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> Isolated(x))\nEmployed(myrtia) -> Nighted(myrtia)\n\nAnile(robinette)\n\ntherefore not Anile(robinette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Curtice is not obovate. Charity is ratlike. Shepperd is behind. If something is glassy and jealous then it is obovate. If something is ratlike and obovate then it is jealous. If something is behind then it is jealous. If something is obovate and ratlike then it is not miserable. If something is behind then it is glassy. If Shepperd is jealous then Shepperd is ratlike. Shepperd is jealous.", "logic": "\nnot Obovate(curtice)\nRatlike(charity)\nBehind(shepperd)\nforall x (Glassy(x) and Jealous(x) -> Obovate(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) and Obovate(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Obovate(x) and Ratlike(x) -> not Miserable(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Glassy(x))\nJealous(shepperd) -> Ratlike(shepperd)\n\nJealous(shepperd)\n\nBehind(shepperd) and forall x (Behind(x) -> Jealous(x)) -> therefore Jealous(shepperd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Raine is not cognizant. Murray is limited. Kare is pelagic. If something is parched and weedless then it is cognizant. If something is limited and cognizant then it is weedless. If something is pelagic then it is weedless. If something is cognizant and limited then it is not timorese. If something is pelagic then it is parched. If Kare is weedless then Kare is limited. Kare is not parched.", "logic": "\nnot Cognizant(raine)\nLimited(murray)\nPelagic(kare)\nforall x (Parched(x) and Weedless(x) -> Cognizant(x))\nforall x (Limited(x) and Cognizant(x) -> Weedless(x))\nforall x (Pelagic(x) -> Weedless(x))\nforall x (Cognizant(x) and Limited(x) -> not Timorese(x))\nforall x (Pelagic(x) -> Parched(x))\nWeedless(kare) -> Limited(kare)\n\nnot Parched(kare)\n\nPelagic(kare) and forall x (Pelagic(x) -> Parched(x)) -> therefore Parched(kare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Terrianne is not hugoesque. Emilia is unconfined. Ardene is clever. If something is nappy and vaccinated then it is hugoesque. If something is unconfined and hugoesque then it is vaccinated. If something is clever then it is vaccinated. If something is hugoesque and unconfined then it is not appellant. If something is clever then it is nappy. If Ardene is vaccinated then Ardene is unconfined. Ardene is unconfined.", "logic": "\nnot Hugoesque(terrianne)\nUnconfined(emilia)\nClever(ardene)\nforall x (Nappy(x) and Vaccinated(x) -> Hugoesque(x))\nforall x (Unconfined(x) and Hugoesque(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) and Unconfined(x) -> not Appellant(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) -> Nappy(x))\nVaccinated(ardene) -> Unconfined(ardene)\n\nUnconfined(ardene)\n\nClever(ardene) and forall x (Clever(x) -> Vaccinated(x)) -> therefore Vaccinated(ardene) Vaccinated(ardene) and Vaccinated(ardene) -> Unconfined(ardene) -> therefore Unconfined(ardene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Cora is not corinthian. Marcia is gossamer. Celle is topknotted. If something is demoniac and natty then it is corinthian. If something is gossamer and corinthian then it is natty. If something is topknotted then it is natty. If something is corinthian and gossamer then it is not valved. If something is topknotted then it is demoniac. If Celle is natty then Celle is gossamer. Celle is not gossamer.", "logic": "\nnot Corinthian(cora)\nGossamer(marcia)\nTopknotted(celle)\nforall x (Demoniac(x) and Natty(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Gossamer(x) and Corinthian(x) -> Natty(x))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Natty(x))\nforall x (Corinthian(x) and Gossamer(x) -> not Valved(x))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Demoniac(x))\nNatty(celle) -> Gossamer(celle)\n\nnot Gossamer(celle)\n\nTopknotted(celle) and forall x (Topknotted(x) -> Natty(x)) -> therefore Natty(celle) Natty(celle) and Natty(celle) -> Gossamer(celle) -> therefore Gossamer(celle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Mariel is not antitumour. Gill is ungeared. Tiana is late. If something is busted and saporous then it is antitumour. If something is ungeared and antitumour then it is saporous. If something is late then it is saporous. If something is antitumour and ungeared then it is not tunisian. If something is late then it is busted. If Tiana is saporous then Tiana is ungeared. Tiana is not tunisian.", "logic": "\nnot Antitumour(mariel)\nUngeared(gill)\nLate(tiana)\nforall x (Busted(x) and Saporous(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Ungeared(x) and Antitumour(x) -> Saporous(x))\nforall x (Late(x) -> Saporous(x))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) and Ungeared(x) -> not Tunisian(x))\nforall x (Late(x) -> Busted(x))\nSaporous(tiana) -> Ungeared(tiana)\n\nnot Tunisian(tiana)\n\nLate(tiana) and forall x (Late(x) -> Busted(x)) -> therefore Busted(tiana) Late(tiana) and forall x (Late(x) -> Saporous(x)) -> therefore Saporous(tiana) Busted(tiana) and Saporous(tiana) and forall x (Busted(x) and Saporous(x) -> Antitumour(x)) -> therefore Antitumour(tiana) Late(tiana) and forall x (Late(x) -> Saporous(x)) -> therefore Saporous(tiana) Saporous(tiana) and Saporous(tiana) -> Ungeared(tiana) -> therefore Ungeared(tiana) Antitumour(tiana) and Ungeared(tiana) and forall x (Antitumour(x) and Ungeared(x) -> not Tunisian(x)) -> therefore not Tunisian(tiana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Daloris is not enervating. Sharai is misty. Westley is purposeful. If something is capitate and helminthic then it is enervating. If something is misty and enervating then it is helminthic. If something is purposeful then it is helminthic. If something is enervating and misty then it is not basifixed. If something is purposeful then it is capitate. If Westley is helminthic then Westley is misty. Westley is basifixed.", "logic": "\nnot Enervating(daloris)\nMisty(sharai)\nPurposeful(westley)\nforall x (Capitate(x) and Helminthic(x) -> Enervating(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) and Enervating(x) -> Helminthic(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) -> Helminthic(x))\nforall x (Enervating(x) and Misty(x) -> not Basifixed(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) -> Capitate(x))\nHelminthic(westley) -> Misty(westley)\n\nBasifixed(westley)\n\nPurposeful(westley) and forall x (Purposeful(x) -> Capitate(x)) -> therefore Capitate(westley) Purposeful(westley) and forall x (Purposeful(x) -> Helminthic(x)) -> therefore Helminthic(westley) Capitate(westley) and Helminthic(westley) and forall x (Capitate(x) and Helminthic(x) -> Enervating(x)) -> therefore Enervating(westley) Purposeful(westley) and forall x (Purposeful(x) -> Helminthic(x)) -> therefore Helminthic(westley) Helminthic(westley) and Helminthic(westley) -> Misty(westley) -> therefore Misty(westley) Enervating(westley) and Misty(westley) and forall x (Enervating(x) and Misty(x) -> not Basifixed(x)) -> therefore not Basifixed(westley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Ruthe is not gummed. Mariele is wonderful. Rozelle is appealable. If something is bolshy and shaggy then it is gummed. If something is wonderful and gummed then it is shaggy. If something is appealable then it is shaggy. If something is gummed and wonderful then it is not remindful. If something is appealable then it is bolshy. If Rozelle is shaggy then Rozelle is wonderful. Mariele is not bolshy.", "logic": "\nnot Gummed(ruthe)\nWonderful(mariele)\nAppealable(rozelle)\nforall x (Bolshy(x) and Shaggy(x) -> Gummed(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and Gummed(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nforall x (Appealable(x) -> Shaggy(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) and Wonderful(x) -> not Remindful(x))\nforall x (Appealable(x) -> Bolshy(x))\nShaggy(rozelle) -> Wonderful(rozelle)\n\nnot Bolshy(mariele)\n\nforall x (Appealable(x) -> Bolshy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Annalyse is not last. Laney is lowering. Gunilla is arguable. If something is blotto and testicular then it is last. If something is lowering and last then it is testicular. If something is arguable then it is testicular. If something is last and lowering then it is not unholy. If something is arguable then it is blotto. If Gunilla is testicular then Gunilla is lowering. Annalyse is blotto.", "logic": "\nnot Last(annalyse)\nLowering(laney)\nArguable(gunilla)\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Testicular(x) -> Last(x))\nforall x (Lowering(x) and Last(x) -> Testicular(x))\nforall x (Arguable(x) -> Testicular(x))\nforall x (Last(x) and Lowering(x) -> not Unholy(x))\nforall x (Arguable(x) -> Blotto(x))\nTesticular(gunilla) -> Lowering(gunilla)\n\nBlotto(annalyse)\n\nforall x (Arguable(x) -> Blotto(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Delly is not loth. Mamie is sectioned. Gwyn is restrained. If something is nosey and chaldee then it is loth. If something is sectioned and loth then it is chaldee. If something is restrained then it is chaldee. If something is loth and sectioned then it is not squeaky. If something is restrained then it is nosey. If Gwyn is chaldee then Gwyn is sectioned. Mamie is not loth.", "logic": "\nnot Loth(delly)\nSectioned(mamie)\nRestrained(gwyn)\nforall x (Nosey(x) and Chaldee(x) -> Loth(x))\nforall x (Sectioned(x) and Loth(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Loth(x) and Sectioned(x) -> not Squeaky(x))\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Nosey(x))\nChaldee(gwyn) -> Sectioned(gwyn)\n\nnot Loth(mamie)\n\nforall x (Nosey(x) and Chaldee(x) -> Loth(x)) <- forall x (Restrained(x) -> Nosey(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Quintin is not corned. Patric is unripe. Billy is loamless. If something is plumbable and underlying then it is corned. If something is unripe and corned then it is underlying. If something is loamless then it is underlying. If something is corned and unripe then it is not unprepared. If something is loamless then it is plumbable. If Billy is underlying then Billy is unripe. Patric is underlying.", "logic": "\nnot Corned(quintin)\nUnripe(patric)\nLoamless(billy)\nforall x (Plumbable(x) and Underlying(x) -> Corned(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Corned(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Loamless(x) -> Underlying(x))\nforall x (Corned(x) and Unripe(x) -> not Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Loamless(x) -> Plumbable(x))\nUnderlying(billy) -> Unripe(billy)\n\nUnderlying(patric)\n\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Corned(x) -> Underlying(x)) <- forall x (Plumbable(x) and Underlying(x) -> Corned(x)) <- forall x (Loamless(x) -> Plumbable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Arne is not larval. Alfreda is ocher. Ali is vesical. If something is bladelike and charnel then it is larval. If something is ocher and larval then it is charnel. If something is vesical then it is charnel. If something is larval and ocher then it is not expository. If something is vesical then it is bladelike. If Ali is charnel then Ali is ocher. Arne is not green.", "logic": "\nnot Larval(arne)\nOcher(alfreda)\nVesical(ali)\nforall x (Bladelike(x) and Charnel(x) -> Larval(x))\nforall x (Ocher(x) and Larval(x) -> Charnel(x))\nforall x (Vesical(x) -> Charnel(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) and Ocher(x) -> not Expository(x))\nforall x (Vesical(x) -> Bladelike(x))\nCharnel(ali) -> Ocher(ali)\n\nnot Green(arne)\n\nnot Green(arne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Pavla is not iconic. Giraud is adrenergic. Ethel is extensive. If something is vestibular and graceful then it is iconic. If something is adrenergic and iconic then it is graceful. If something is extensive then it is graceful. If something is iconic and adrenergic then it is not gradable. If something is extensive then it is vestibular. If Ethel is graceful then Ethel is adrenergic. Giraud is green.", "logic": "\nnot Iconic(pavla)\nAdrenergic(giraud)\nExtensive(ethel)\nforall x (Vestibular(x) and Graceful(x) -> Iconic(x))\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) and Iconic(x) -> Graceful(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Graceful(x))\nforall x (Iconic(x) and Adrenergic(x) -> not Gradable(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nGraceful(ethel) -> Adrenergic(ethel)\n\nGreen(giraud)\n\nGreen(giraud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Dulce is not shelled. Henri is alienated. Rozele is smuggled. If something is apish and impolitic then it is shelled. If something is alienated and shelled then it is impolitic. If something is smuggled then it is impolitic. If something is shelled and alienated then it is not botulinal. If something is smuggled then it is apish. If Rozele is impolitic then Rozele is alienated. Dulce is not botulinal.", "logic": "\nnot Shelled(dulce)\nAlienated(henri)\nSmuggled(rozele)\nforall x (Apish(x) and Impolitic(x) -> Shelled(x))\nforall x (Alienated(x) and Shelled(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nforall x (Smuggled(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nforall x (Shelled(x) and Alienated(x) -> not Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Smuggled(x) -> Apish(x))\nImpolitic(rozele) -> Alienated(rozele)\n\nnot Botulinal(dulce)\n\nnot Botulinal(dulce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "Trip is not deranged. Ola is geared. Traci is bent. If something is fabulous and exact then it is deranged. If something is geared and deranged then it is exact. If something is bent then it is exact. If something is deranged and geared then it is not cured. If something is bent then it is fabulous. If Traci is exact then Traci is geared. Traci is green.", "logic": "\nnot Deranged(trip)\nGeared(ola)\nBent(traci)\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and Exact(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Geared(x) and Deranged(x) -> Exact(x))\nforall x (Bent(x) -> Exact(x))\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Geared(x) -> not Cured(x))\nforall x (Bent(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nExact(traci) -> Geared(traci)\n\nGreen(traci)\n\nGreen(traci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The sallyanne is venturous. The sallyanne is ductless. The sallyanne does not need the carri. The sallyanne reave the polly. The sallyanne reave the carri. The sallyanne offsaddle the polly. The sallyanne does not visit the carri. The polly accent the sallyanne. The polly accent the carri. The polly offsaddle the sallyanne. The carri is venturous. The carri is ductless. The carri accent the sallyanne. The carri reave the sallyanne. The carri offsaddle the polly. If something offsaddle the sallyanne and it does not see the polly then the sallyanne is venturous. If something is venturous and it offsaddle the carri then it reave the carri. If the carri reave the polly then the polly is ductless. If something offsaddle the sallyanne and it is foreign then the sallyanne does not visit the polly. If something offsaddle the sallyanne and it is homogenous then it is fatheaded. If something is foreign then it offsaddle the carri. If something offsaddle the polly and the polly accent the carri then the carri is foreign. If something reave the carri and the carri reave the polly then the polly does not need the sallyanne. The polly accent the sallyanne.", "logic": "\nVenturous(sallyanne)\nDuctless(sallyanne)\nnot Accent(sallyanne, carri)\nReave(sallyanne, polly)\nReave(sallyanne, carri)\nOffsaddle(sallyanne, polly)\nnot Offsaddle(sallyanne, carri)\nAccent(polly, sallyanne)\nAccent(polly, carri)\nOffsaddle(polly, sallyanne)\nVenturous(carri)\nDuctless(carri)\nAccent(carri, sallyanne)\nReave(carri, sallyanne)\nOffsaddle(carri, polly)\nforall x (Offsaddle(x, sallyanne) and not Reave(x, polly) -> Venturous(sallyanne))\nforall x (Venturous(x) and Offsaddle(x, carri) -> Reave(x, carri))\nReave(carri, polly) -> Ductless(polly)\nforall x (Offsaddle(x, sallyanne) and Foreign(x) -> not Offsaddle(sallyanne, polly))\nforall x (Offsaddle(x, sallyanne) and Homogenous(x) -> Fatheaded(x))\nforall x (Foreign(x) -> Offsaddle(x, carri))\nforall x (Offsaddle(x, polly) and Accent(polly, carri) -> Foreign(carri))\nforall x (Reave(x, carri) and Reave(carri, polly) -> not Accent(polly, sallyanne))\n\nAccent(polly, sallyanne)\n\ntherefore Accent(polly, sallyanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The nata is incomplete. The nata is unreleased. The nata does not need the julius. The nata maneuver the ricardo. The nata maneuver the julius. The nata honour the ricardo. The nata does not visit the julius. The ricardo crumble the nata. The ricardo crumble the julius. The ricardo honour the nata. The julius is incomplete. The julius is unreleased. The julius crumble the nata. The julius maneuver the nata. The julius honour the ricardo. If something honour the nata and it does not see the ricardo then the nata is incomplete. If something is incomplete and it honour the julius then it maneuver the julius. If the julius maneuver the ricardo then the ricardo is unreleased. If something honour the nata and it is hellenic then the nata does not visit the ricardo. If something honour the nata and it is plastic then it is ultimo. If something is hellenic then it honour the julius. If something honour the ricardo and the ricardo crumble the julius then the julius is hellenic. If something maneuver the julius and the julius maneuver the ricardo then the ricardo does not need the nata. The ricardo does not need the nata.", "logic": "\nIncomplete(nata)\nUnreleased(nata)\nnot Crumble(nata, julius)\nManeuver(nata, ricardo)\nManeuver(nata, julius)\nHonour(nata, ricardo)\nnot Honour(nata, julius)\nCrumble(ricardo, nata)\nCrumble(ricardo, julius)\nHonour(ricardo, nata)\nIncomplete(julius)\nUnreleased(julius)\nCrumble(julius, nata)\nManeuver(julius, nata)\nHonour(julius, ricardo)\nforall x (Honour(x, nata) and not Maneuver(x, ricardo) -> Incomplete(nata))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) and Honour(x, julius) -> Maneuver(x, julius))\nManeuver(julius, ricardo) -> Unreleased(ricardo)\nforall x (Honour(x, nata) and Hellenic(x) -> not Honour(nata, ricardo))\nforall x (Honour(x, nata) and Plastic(x) -> Ultimo(x))\nforall x (Hellenic(x) -> Honour(x, julius))\nforall x (Honour(x, ricardo) and Crumble(ricardo, julius) -> Hellenic(julius))\nforall x (Maneuver(x, julius) and Maneuver(julius, ricardo) -> not Crumble(ricardo, nata))\n\nnot Crumble(ricardo, nata)\n\ntherefore Crumble(ricardo, nata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The gavrielle is colicky. The gavrielle is deceased. The gavrielle does not need the christian. The gavrielle expend the fabrice. The gavrielle expend the christian. The gavrielle regiment the fabrice. The gavrielle does not visit the christian. The fabrice blackberry the gavrielle. The fabrice blackberry the christian. The fabrice regiment the gavrielle. The christian is colicky. The christian is deceased. The christian blackberry the gavrielle. The christian expend the gavrielle. The christian regiment the fabrice. If something regiment the gavrielle and it does not see the fabrice then the gavrielle is colicky. If something is colicky and it regiment the christian then it expend the christian. If the christian expend the fabrice then the fabrice is deceased. If something regiment the gavrielle and it is overnight then the gavrielle does not visit the fabrice. If something regiment the gavrielle and it is holistic then it is mongol. If something is overnight then it regiment the christian. If something regiment the fabrice and the fabrice blackberry the christian then the christian is overnight. If something expend the christian and the christian expend the fabrice then the fabrice does not need the gavrielle. The christian is overnight.", "logic": "\nColicky(gavrielle)\nDeceased(gavrielle)\nnot Blackberry(gavrielle, christian)\nExpend(gavrielle, fabrice)\nExpend(gavrielle, christian)\nRegiment(gavrielle, fabrice)\nnot Regiment(gavrielle, christian)\nBlackberry(fabrice, gavrielle)\nBlackberry(fabrice, christian)\nRegiment(fabrice, gavrielle)\nColicky(christian)\nDeceased(christian)\nBlackberry(christian, gavrielle)\nExpend(christian, gavrielle)\nRegiment(christian, fabrice)\nforall x (Regiment(x, gavrielle) and not Expend(x, fabrice) -> Colicky(gavrielle))\nforall x (Colicky(x) and Regiment(x, christian) -> Expend(x, christian))\nExpend(christian, fabrice) -> Deceased(fabrice)\nforall x (Regiment(x, gavrielle) and Overnight(x) -> not Regiment(gavrielle, fabrice))\nforall x (Regiment(x, gavrielle) and Holistic(x) -> Mongol(x))\nforall x (Overnight(x) -> Regiment(x, christian))\nforall x (Regiment(x, fabrice) and Blackberry(fabrice, christian) -> Overnight(christian))\nforall x (Expend(x, christian) and Expend(christian, fabrice) -> not Blackberry(fabrice, gavrielle))\n\nOvernight(christian)\n\nRegiment(christian, fabrice) and Blackberry(fabrice, christian) and forall x (Regiment(x, fabrice) and Blackberry(fabrice, christian) -> Overnight(christian)) -> therefore Overnight(christian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The penrod is synaptic. The penrod is implanted. The penrod does not need the sioux. The penrod categorize the winthrop. The penrod categorize the sioux. The penrod eternalise the winthrop. The penrod does not visit the sioux. The winthrop split the penrod. The winthrop split the sioux. The winthrop eternalise the penrod. The sioux is synaptic. The sioux is implanted. The sioux split the penrod. The sioux categorize the penrod. The sioux eternalise the winthrop. If something eternalise the penrod and it does not see the winthrop then the penrod is synaptic. If something is synaptic and it eternalise the sioux then it categorize the sioux. If the sioux categorize the winthrop then the winthrop is implanted. If something eternalise the penrod and it is simple then the penrod does not visit the winthrop. If something eternalise the penrod and it is prepared then it is chafflike. If something is simple then it eternalise the sioux. If something eternalise the winthrop and the winthrop split the sioux then the sioux is simple. If something categorize the sioux and the sioux categorize the winthrop then the winthrop does not need the penrod. The sioux is not simple.", "logic": "\nSynaptic(penrod)\nImplanted(penrod)\nnot Split(penrod, sioux)\nCategorize(penrod, winthrop)\nCategorize(penrod, sioux)\nEternalise(penrod, winthrop)\nnot Eternalise(penrod, sioux)\nSplit(winthrop, penrod)\nSplit(winthrop, sioux)\nEternalise(winthrop, penrod)\nSynaptic(sioux)\nImplanted(sioux)\nSplit(sioux, penrod)\nCategorize(sioux, penrod)\nEternalise(sioux, winthrop)\nforall x (Eternalise(x, penrod) and not Categorize(x, winthrop) -> Synaptic(penrod))\nforall x (Synaptic(x) and Eternalise(x, sioux) -> Categorize(x, sioux))\nCategorize(sioux, winthrop) -> Implanted(winthrop)\nforall x (Eternalise(x, penrod) and Simple(x) -> not Eternalise(penrod, winthrop))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, penrod) and Prepared(x) -> Chafflike(x))\nforall x (Simple(x) -> Eternalise(x, sioux))\nforall x (Eternalise(x, winthrop) and Split(winthrop, sioux) -> Simple(sioux))\nforall x (Categorize(x, sioux) and Categorize(sioux, winthrop) -> not Split(winthrop, penrod))\n\nnot Simple(sioux)\n\nEternalise(sioux, winthrop) and Split(winthrop, sioux) and forall x (Eternalise(x, winthrop) and Split(winthrop, sioux) -> Simple(sioux)) -> therefore Simple(sioux)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The sibylla is humorous. The sibylla is coagulate. The sibylla does not need the pietra. The sibylla animate the shandy. The sibylla animate the pietra. The sibylla approach the shandy. The sibylla does not visit the pietra. The shandy masticate the sibylla. The shandy masticate the pietra. The shandy approach the sibylla. The pietra is humorous. The pietra is coagulate. The pietra masticate the sibylla. The pietra animate the sibylla. The pietra approach the shandy. If something approach the sibylla and it does not see the shandy then the sibylla is humorous. If something is humorous and it approach the pietra then it animate the pietra. If the pietra animate the shandy then the shandy is coagulate. If something approach the sibylla and it is oecumenic then the sibylla does not visit the shandy. If something approach the sibylla and it is bypast then it is hominid. If something is oecumenic then it approach the pietra. If something approach the shandy and the shandy masticate the pietra then the pietra is oecumenic. If something animate the pietra and the pietra animate the shandy then the shandy does not need the sibylla. The pietra approach the pietra.", "logic": "\nHumorous(sibylla)\nCoagulate(sibylla)\nnot Masticate(sibylla, pietra)\nAnimate(sibylla, shandy)\nAnimate(sibylla, pietra)\nApproach(sibylla, shandy)\nnot Approach(sibylla, pietra)\nMasticate(shandy, sibylla)\nMasticate(shandy, pietra)\nApproach(shandy, sibylla)\nHumorous(pietra)\nCoagulate(pietra)\nMasticate(pietra, sibylla)\nAnimate(pietra, sibylla)\nApproach(pietra, shandy)\nforall x (Approach(x, sibylla) and not Animate(x, shandy) -> Humorous(sibylla))\nforall x (Humorous(x) and Approach(x, pietra) -> Animate(x, pietra))\nAnimate(pietra, shandy) -> Coagulate(shandy)\nforall x (Approach(x, sibylla) and Oecumenic(x) -> not Approach(sibylla, shandy))\nforall x (Approach(x, sibylla) and Bypast(x) -> Hominid(x))\nforall x (Oecumenic(x) -> Approach(x, pietra))\nforall x (Approach(x, shandy) and Masticate(shandy, pietra) -> Oecumenic(pietra))\nforall x (Animate(x, pietra) and Animate(pietra, shandy) -> not Masticate(shandy, sibylla))\n\nApproach(pietra, pietra)\n\nApproach(pietra, shandy) and Masticate(shandy, pietra) and forall x (Approach(x, shandy) and Masticate(shandy, pietra) -> Oecumenic(pietra)) -> therefore Oecumenic(pietra) Oecumenic(pietra) and forall x (Oecumenic(x) -> Approach(x, pietra)) -> therefore Approach(pietra, pietra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The jeni is risible. The jeni is aldehydic. The jeni does not need the belicia. The jeni pose the alicia. The jeni pose the belicia. The jeni postmark the alicia. The jeni does not visit the belicia. The alicia bite the jeni. The alicia bite the belicia. The alicia postmark the jeni. The belicia is risible. The belicia is aldehydic. The belicia bite the jeni. The belicia pose the jeni. The belicia postmark the alicia. If something postmark the jeni and it does not see the alicia then the jeni is risible. If something is risible and it postmark the belicia then it pose the belicia. If the belicia pose the alicia then the alicia is aldehydic. If something postmark the jeni and it is sensate then the jeni does not visit the alicia. If something postmark the jeni and it is menacing then it is postpaid. If something is sensate then it postmark the belicia. If something postmark the alicia and the alicia bite the belicia then the belicia is sensate. If something pose the belicia and the belicia pose the alicia then the alicia does not need the jeni. The belicia does not visit the belicia.", "logic": "\nRisible(jeni)\nAldehydic(jeni)\nnot Bite(jeni, belicia)\nPose(jeni, alicia)\nPose(jeni, belicia)\nPostmark(jeni, alicia)\nnot Postmark(jeni, belicia)\nBite(alicia, jeni)\nBite(alicia, belicia)\nPostmark(alicia, jeni)\nRisible(belicia)\nAldehydic(belicia)\nBite(belicia, jeni)\nPose(belicia, jeni)\nPostmark(belicia, alicia)\nforall x (Postmark(x, jeni) and not Pose(x, alicia) -> Risible(jeni))\nforall x (Risible(x) and Postmark(x, belicia) -> Pose(x, belicia))\nPose(belicia, alicia) -> Aldehydic(alicia)\nforall x (Postmark(x, jeni) and Sensate(x) -> not Postmark(jeni, alicia))\nforall x (Postmark(x, jeni) and Menacing(x) -> Postpaid(x))\nforall x (Sensate(x) -> Postmark(x, belicia))\nforall x (Postmark(x, alicia) and Bite(alicia, belicia) -> Sensate(belicia))\nforall x (Pose(x, belicia) and Pose(belicia, alicia) -> not Bite(alicia, jeni))\n\nnot Postmark(belicia, belicia)\n\nPostmark(belicia, alicia) and Bite(alicia, belicia) and forall x (Postmark(x, alicia) and Bite(alicia, belicia) -> Sensate(belicia)) -> therefore Sensate(belicia) Sensate(belicia) and forall x (Sensate(x) -> Postmark(x, belicia)) -> therefore Postmark(belicia, belicia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The hynda is sixtieth. The hynda is velvet. The hynda does not need the zachary. The hynda batch the ursulina. The hynda batch the zachary. The hynda touch the ursulina. The hynda does not visit the zachary. The ursulina sympathize the hynda. The ursulina sympathize the zachary. The ursulina touch the hynda. The zachary is sixtieth. The zachary is velvet. The zachary sympathize the hynda. The zachary batch the hynda. The zachary touch the ursulina. If something touch the hynda and it does not see the ursulina then the hynda is sixtieth. If something is sixtieth and it touch the zachary then it batch the zachary. If the zachary batch the ursulina then the ursulina is velvet. If something touch the hynda and it is heated then the hynda does not visit the ursulina. If something touch the hynda and it is ridiculous then it is alpestrine. If something is heated then it touch the zachary. If something touch the ursulina and the ursulina sympathize the zachary then the zachary is heated. If something batch the zachary and the zachary batch the ursulina then the ursulina does not need the hynda. The zachary batch the zachary.", "logic": "\nSixtieth(hynda)\nVelvet(hynda)\nnot Sympathize(hynda, zachary)\nBatch(hynda, ursulina)\nBatch(hynda, zachary)\nTouch(hynda, ursulina)\nnot Touch(hynda, zachary)\nSympathize(ursulina, hynda)\nSympathize(ursulina, zachary)\nTouch(ursulina, hynda)\nSixtieth(zachary)\nVelvet(zachary)\nSympathize(zachary, hynda)\nBatch(zachary, hynda)\nTouch(zachary, ursulina)\nforall x (Touch(x, hynda) and not Batch(x, ursulina) -> Sixtieth(hynda))\nforall x (Sixtieth(x) and Touch(x, zachary) -> Batch(x, zachary))\nBatch(zachary, ursulina) -> Velvet(ursulina)\nforall x (Touch(x, hynda) and Heated(x) -> not Touch(hynda, ursulina))\nforall x (Touch(x, hynda) and Ridiculous(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Heated(x) -> Touch(x, zachary))\nforall x (Touch(x, ursulina) and Sympathize(ursulina, zachary) -> Heated(zachary))\nforall x (Batch(x, zachary) and Batch(zachary, ursulina) -> not Sympathize(ursulina, hynda))\n\nBatch(zachary, zachary)\n\nTouch(zachary, ursulina) and Sympathize(ursulina, zachary) and forall x (Touch(x, ursulina) and Sympathize(ursulina, zachary) -> Heated(zachary)) -> therefore Heated(zachary) Heated(zachary) and forall x (Heated(x) -> Touch(x, zachary)) -> therefore Touch(zachary, zachary) Sixtieth(zachary) and Touch(zachary, zachary) and forall x (Sixtieth(x) and Touch(x, zachary) -> Batch(x, zachary)) -> therefore Batch(zachary, zachary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The jori is dipylon. The jori is agrologic. The jori does not need the kissee. The jori inebriate the maureen. The jori inebriate the kissee. The jori mollify the maureen. The jori does not visit the kissee. The maureen truck the jori. The maureen truck the kissee. The maureen mollify the jori. The kissee is dipylon. The kissee is agrologic. The kissee truck the jori. The kissee inebriate the jori. The kissee mollify the maureen. If something mollify the jori and it does not see the maureen then the jori is dipylon. If something is dipylon and it mollify the kissee then it inebriate the kissee. If the kissee inebriate the maureen then the maureen is agrologic. If something mollify the jori and it is alkylic then the jori does not visit the maureen. If something mollify the jori and it is divergent then it is unvarying. If something is alkylic then it mollify the kissee. If something mollify the maureen and the maureen truck the kissee then the kissee is alkylic. If something inebriate the kissee and the kissee inebriate the maureen then the maureen does not need the jori. The kissee does not see the kissee.", "logic": "\nDipylon(jori)\nAgrologic(jori)\nnot Truck(jori, kissee)\nInebriate(jori, maureen)\nInebriate(jori, kissee)\nMollify(jori, maureen)\nnot Mollify(jori, kissee)\nTruck(maureen, jori)\nTruck(maureen, kissee)\nMollify(maureen, jori)\nDipylon(kissee)\nAgrologic(kissee)\nTruck(kissee, jori)\nInebriate(kissee, jori)\nMollify(kissee, maureen)\nforall x (Mollify(x, jori) and not Inebriate(x, maureen) -> Dipylon(jori))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and Mollify(x, kissee) -> Inebriate(x, kissee))\nInebriate(kissee, maureen) -> Agrologic(maureen)\nforall x (Mollify(x, jori) and Alkylic(x) -> not Mollify(jori, maureen))\nforall x (Mollify(x, jori) and Divergent(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Mollify(x, kissee))\nforall x (Mollify(x, maureen) and Truck(maureen, kissee) -> Alkylic(kissee))\nforall x (Inebriate(x, kissee) and Inebriate(kissee, maureen) -> not Truck(maureen, jori))\n\nnot Inebriate(kissee, kissee)\n\nMollify(kissee, maureen) and Truck(maureen, kissee) and forall x (Mollify(x, maureen) and Truck(maureen, kissee) -> Alkylic(kissee)) -> therefore Alkylic(kissee) Alkylic(kissee) and forall x (Alkylic(x) -> Mollify(x, kissee)) -> therefore Mollify(kissee, kissee) Dipylon(kissee) and Mollify(kissee, kissee) and forall x (Dipylon(x) and Mollify(x, kissee) -> Inebriate(x, kissee)) -> therefore Inebriate(kissee, kissee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The milicent is reversive. The milicent is arresting. The milicent does not need the bamby. The milicent reassemble the emmye. The milicent reassemble the bamby. The milicent foreswear the emmye. The milicent does not visit the bamby. The emmye provoke the milicent. The emmye provoke the bamby. The emmye foreswear the milicent. The bamby is reversive. The bamby is arresting. The bamby provoke the milicent. The bamby reassemble the milicent. The bamby foreswear the emmye. If something foreswear the milicent and it does not see the emmye then the milicent is reversive. If something is reversive and it foreswear the bamby then it reassemble the bamby. If the bamby reassemble the emmye then the emmye is arresting. If something foreswear the milicent and it is wholesale then the milicent does not visit the emmye. If something foreswear the milicent and it is gymnastic then it is semilunar. If something is wholesale then it foreswear the bamby. If something foreswear the emmye and the emmye provoke the bamby then the bamby is wholesale. If something reassemble the bamby and the bamby reassemble the emmye then the emmye does not need the milicent. The milicent is not semilunar.", "logic": "\nReversive(milicent)\nArresting(milicent)\nnot Provoke(milicent, bamby)\nReassemble(milicent, emmye)\nReassemble(milicent, bamby)\nForeswear(milicent, emmye)\nnot Foreswear(milicent, bamby)\nProvoke(emmye, milicent)\nProvoke(emmye, bamby)\nForeswear(emmye, milicent)\nReversive(bamby)\nArresting(bamby)\nProvoke(bamby, milicent)\nReassemble(bamby, milicent)\nForeswear(bamby, emmye)\nforall x (Foreswear(x, milicent) and not Reassemble(x, emmye) -> Reversive(milicent))\nforall x (Reversive(x) and Foreswear(x, bamby) -> Reassemble(x, bamby))\nReassemble(bamby, emmye) -> Arresting(emmye)\nforall x (Foreswear(x, milicent) and Wholesale(x) -> not Foreswear(milicent, emmye))\nforall x (Foreswear(x, milicent) and Gymnastic(x) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Wholesale(x) -> Foreswear(x, bamby))\nforall x (Foreswear(x, emmye) and Provoke(emmye, bamby) -> Wholesale(bamby))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, bamby) and Reassemble(bamby, emmye) -> not Provoke(emmye, milicent))\n\nnot Semilunar(milicent)\n\nforall x (Foreswear(x, milicent) and Gymnastic(x) -> Semilunar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The anton is sanctified. The anton is worn. The anton does not need the maryellen. The anton hyphenate the jemmie. The anton hyphenate the maryellen. The anton adjure the jemmie. The anton does not visit the maryellen. The jemmie perform the anton. The jemmie perform the maryellen. The jemmie adjure the anton. The maryellen is sanctified. The maryellen is worn. The maryellen perform the anton. The maryellen hyphenate the anton. The maryellen adjure the jemmie. If something adjure the anton and it does not see the jemmie then the anton is sanctified. If something is sanctified and it adjure the maryellen then it hyphenate the maryellen. If the maryellen hyphenate the jemmie then the jemmie is worn. If something adjure the anton and it is nonlinear then the anton does not visit the jemmie. If something adjure the anton and it is executed then it is bestubbled. If something is nonlinear then it adjure the maryellen. If something adjure the jemmie and the jemmie perform the maryellen then the maryellen is nonlinear. If something hyphenate the maryellen and the maryellen hyphenate the jemmie then the jemmie does not need the anton. The jemmie hyphenate the maryellen.", "logic": "\nSanctified(anton)\nWorn(anton)\nnot Perform(anton, maryellen)\nHyphenate(anton, jemmie)\nHyphenate(anton, maryellen)\nAdjure(anton, jemmie)\nnot Adjure(anton, maryellen)\nPerform(jemmie, anton)\nPerform(jemmie, maryellen)\nAdjure(jemmie, anton)\nSanctified(maryellen)\nWorn(maryellen)\nPerform(maryellen, anton)\nHyphenate(maryellen, anton)\nAdjure(maryellen, jemmie)\nforall x (Adjure(x, anton) and not Hyphenate(x, jemmie) -> Sanctified(anton))\nforall x (Sanctified(x) and Adjure(x, maryellen) -> Hyphenate(x, maryellen))\nHyphenate(maryellen, jemmie) -> Worn(jemmie)\nforall x (Adjure(x, anton) and Nonlinear(x) -> not Adjure(anton, jemmie))\nforall x (Adjure(x, anton) and Executed(x) -> Bestubbled(x))\nforall x (Nonlinear(x) -> Adjure(x, maryellen))\nforall x (Adjure(x, jemmie) and Perform(jemmie, maryellen) -> Nonlinear(maryellen))\nforall x (Hyphenate(x, maryellen) and Hyphenate(maryellen, jemmie) -> not Perform(jemmie, anton))\n\nHyphenate(jemmie, maryellen)\n\nforall x (Sanctified(x) and Adjure(x, maryellen) -> Hyphenate(x, maryellen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The torrie is hermetic. The torrie is authentic. The torrie does not need the deva. The torrie preside the lenee. The torrie preside the deva. The torrie trivialize the lenee. The torrie does not visit the deva. The lenee depute the torrie. The lenee depute the deva. The lenee trivialize the torrie. The deva is hermetic. The deva is authentic. The deva depute the torrie. The deva preside the torrie. The deva trivialize the lenee. If something trivialize the torrie and it does not see the lenee then the torrie is hermetic. If something is hermetic and it trivialize the deva then it preside the deva. If the deva preside the lenee then the lenee is authentic. If something trivialize the torrie and it is draconian then the torrie does not visit the lenee. If something trivialize the torrie and it is disgusting then it is daring. If something is draconian then it trivialize the deva. If something trivialize the lenee and the lenee depute the deva then the deva is draconian. If something preside the deva and the deva preside the lenee then the lenee does not need the torrie. The lenee is not authentic.", "logic": "\nHermetic(torrie)\nAuthentic(torrie)\nnot Depute(torrie, deva)\nPreside(torrie, lenee)\nPreside(torrie, deva)\nTrivialize(torrie, lenee)\nnot Trivialize(torrie, deva)\nDepute(lenee, torrie)\nDepute(lenee, deva)\nTrivialize(lenee, torrie)\nHermetic(deva)\nAuthentic(deva)\nDepute(deva, torrie)\nPreside(deva, torrie)\nTrivialize(deva, lenee)\nforall x (Trivialize(x, torrie) and not Preside(x, lenee) -> Hermetic(torrie))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) and Trivialize(x, deva) -> Preside(x, deva))\nPreside(deva, lenee) -> Authentic(lenee)\nforall x (Trivialize(x, torrie) and Draconian(x) -> not Trivialize(torrie, lenee))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, torrie) and Disgusting(x) -> Daring(x))\nforall x (Draconian(x) -> Trivialize(x, deva))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, lenee) and Depute(lenee, deva) -> Draconian(deva))\nforall x (Preside(x, deva) and Preside(deva, lenee) -> not Depute(lenee, torrie))\n\nnot Authentic(lenee)\n\nPreside(deva, lenee) -> Authentic(lenee) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The miles is funereal. The miles is ventilated. The miles does not need the isaiah. The miles smoulder the lidia. The miles smoulder the isaiah. The miles bloviate the lidia. The miles does not visit the isaiah. The lidia besmear the miles. The lidia besmear the isaiah. The lidia bloviate the miles. The isaiah is funereal. The isaiah is ventilated. The isaiah besmear the miles. The isaiah smoulder the miles. The isaiah bloviate the lidia. If something bloviate the miles and it does not see the lidia then the miles is funereal. If something is funereal and it bloviate the isaiah then it smoulder the isaiah. If the isaiah smoulder the lidia then the lidia is ventilated. If something bloviate the miles and it is scorbutic then the miles does not visit the lidia. If something bloviate the miles and it is exonerated then it is perturbed. If something is scorbutic then it bloviate the isaiah. If something bloviate the lidia and the lidia besmear the isaiah then the isaiah is scorbutic. If something smoulder the isaiah and the isaiah smoulder the lidia then the lidia does not need the miles. The lidia is perturbed.", "logic": "\nFunereal(miles)\nVentilated(miles)\nnot Besmear(miles, isaiah)\nSmoulder(miles, lidia)\nSmoulder(miles, isaiah)\nBloviate(miles, lidia)\nnot Bloviate(miles, isaiah)\nBesmear(lidia, miles)\nBesmear(lidia, isaiah)\nBloviate(lidia, miles)\nFunereal(isaiah)\nVentilated(isaiah)\nBesmear(isaiah, miles)\nSmoulder(isaiah, miles)\nBloviate(isaiah, lidia)\nforall x (Bloviate(x, miles) and not Smoulder(x, lidia) -> Funereal(miles))\nforall x (Funereal(x) and Bloviate(x, isaiah) -> Smoulder(x, isaiah))\nSmoulder(isaiah, lidia) -> Ventilated(lidia)\nforall x (Bloviate(x, miles) and Scorbutic(x) -> not Bloviate(miles, lidia))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, miles) and Exonerated(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) -> Bloviate(x, isaiah))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, lidia) and Besmear(lidia, isaiah) -> Scorbutic(isaiah))\nforall x (Smoulder(x, isaiah) and Smoulder(isaiah, lidia) -> not Besmear(lidia, miles))\n\nPerturbed(lidia)\n\nforall x (Bloviate(x, miles) and Exonerated(x) -> Perturbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The thibaud is rush. The thibaud is jellied. The thibaud does not need the david. The thibaud float the karyl. The thibaud float the david. The thibaud larrup the karyl. The thibaud does not visit the david. The karyl redound the thibaud. The karyl redound the david. The karyl larrup the thibaud. The david is rush. The david is jellied. The david redound the thibaud. The david float the thibaud. The david larrup the karyl. If something larrup the thibaud and it does not see the karyl then the thibaud is rush. If something is rush and it larrup the david then it float the david. If the david float the karyl then the karyl is jellied. If something larrup the thibaud and it is macho then the thibaud does not visit the karyl. If something larrup the thibaud and it is ironlike then it is spasmodic. If something is macho then it larrup the david. If something larrup the karyl and the karyl redound the david then the david is macho. If something float the david and the david float the karyl then the karyl does not need the thibaud. The david does not need the david.", "logic": "\nRush(thibaud)\nJellied(thibaud)\nnot Redound(thibaud, david)\nFloat(thibaud, karyl)\nFloat(thibaud, david)\nLarrup(thibaud, karyl)\nnot Larrup(thibaud, david)\nRedound(karyl, thibaud)\nRedound(karyl, david)\nLarrup(karyl, thibaud)\nRush(david)\nJellied(david)\nRedound(david, thibaud)\nFloat(david, thibaud)\nLarrup(david, karyl)\nforall x (Larrup(x, thibaud) and not Float(x, karyl) -> Rush(thibaud))\nforall x (Rush(x) and Larrup(x, david) -> Float(x, david))\nFloat(david, karyl) -> Jellied(karyl)\nforall x (Larrup(x, thibaud) and Macho(x) -> not Larrup(thibaud, karyl))\nforall x (Larrup(x, thibaud) and Ironlike(x) -> Spasmodic(x))\nforall x (Macho(x) -> Larrup(x, david))\nforall x (Larrup(x, karyl) and Redound(karyl, david) -> Macho(david))\nforall x (Float(x, david) and Float(david, karyl) -> not Redound(karyl, thibaud))\n\nnot Redound(david, david)\n\nnot Redound(david, david) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The carmelle is rutty. The carmelle is unsnarled. The carmelle does not need the dewitt. The carmelle rubric the dru. The carmelle rubric the dewitt. The carmelle uplift the dru. The carmelle does not visit the dewitt. The dru delocalize the carmelle. The dru delocalize the dewitt. The dru uplift the carmelle. The dewitt is rutty. The dewitt is unsnarled. The dewitt delocalize the carmelle. The dewitt rubric the carmelle. The dewitt uplift the dru. If something uplift the carmelle and it does not see the dru then the carmelle is rutty. If something is rutty and it uplift the dewitt then it rubric the dewitt. If the dewitt rubric the dru then the dru is unsnarled. If something uplift the carmelle and it is acoustic then the carmelle does not visit the dru. If something uplift the carmelle and it is swart then it is unshaped. If something is acoustic then it uplift the dewitt. If something uplift the dru and the dru delocalize the dewitt then the dewitt is acoustic. If something rubric the dewitt and the dewitt rubric the dru then the dru does not need the carmelle. The carmelle is swart.", "logic": "\nRutty(carmelle)\nUnsnarled(carmelle)\nnot Delocalize(carmelle, dewitt)\nRubric(carmelle, dru)\nRubric(carmelle, dewitt)\nUplift(carmelle, dru)\nnot Uplift(carmelle, dewitt)\nDelocalize(dru, carmelle)\nDelocalize(dru, dewitt)\nUplift(dru, carmelle)\nRutty(dewitt)\nUnsnarled(dewitt)\nDelocalize(dewitt, carmelle)\nRubric(dewitt, carmelle)\nUplift(dewitt, dru)\nforall x (Uplift(x, carmelle) and not Rubric(x, dru) -> Rutty(carmelle))\nforall x (Rutty(x) and Uplift(x, dewitt) -> Rubric(x, dewitt))\nRubric(dewitt, dru) -> Unsnarled(dru)\nforall x (Uplift(x, carmelle) and Acoustic(x) -> not Uplift(carmelle, dru))\nforall x (Uplift(x, carmelle) and Swart(x) -> Unshaped(x))\nforall x (Acoustic(x) -> Uplift(x, dewitt))\nforall x (Uplift(x, dru) and Delocalize(dru, dewitt) -> Acoustic(dewitt))\nforall x (Rubric(x, dewitt) and Rubric(dewitt, dru) -> not Delocalize(dru, carmelle))\n\nSwart(carmelle)\n\nSwart(carmelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The allyce is prone. The allyce is colonnaded. The allyce does not need the reeba. The allyce confide the tarah. The allyce confide the reeba. The allyce untwine the tarah. The allyce does not visit the reeba. The tarah kibosh the allyce. The tarah kibosh the reeba. The tarah untwine the allyce. The reeba is prone. The reeba is colonnaded. The reeba kibosh the allyce. The reeba confide the allyce. The reeba untwine the tarah. If something untwine the allyce and it does not see the tarah then the allyce is prone. If something is prone and it untwine the reeba then it confide the reeba. If the reeba confide the tarah then the tarah is colonnaded. If something untwine the allyce and it is thwarting then the allyce does not visit the tarah. If something untwine the allyce and it is mishnaic then it is aground. If something is thwarting then it untwine the reeba. If something untwine the tarah and the tarah kibosh the reeba then the reeba is thwarting. If something confide the reeba and the reeba confide the tarah then the tarah does not need the allyce. The tarah is not prone.", "logic": "\nProne(allyce)\nColonnaded(allyce)\nnot Kibosh(allyce, reeba)\nConfide(allyce, tarah)\nConfide(allyce, reeba)\nUntwine(allyce, tarah)\nnot Untwine(allyce, reeba)\nKibosh(tarah, allyce)\nKibosh(tarah, reeba)\nUntwine(tarah, allyce)\nProne(reeba)\nColonnaded(reeba)\nKibosh(reeba, allyce)\nConfide(reeba, allyce)\nUntwine(reeba, tarah)\nforall x (Untwine(x, allyce) and not Confide(x, tarah) -> Prone(allyce))\nforall x (Prone(x) and Untwine(x, reeba) -> Confide(x, reeba))\nConfide(reeba, tarah) -> Colonnaded(tarah)\nforall x (Untwine(x, allyce) and Thwarting(x) -> not Untwine(allyce, tarah))\nforall x (Untwine(x, allyce) and Mishnaic(x) -> Aground(x))\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Untwine(x, reeba))\nforall x (Untwine(x, tarah) and Kibosh(tarah, reeba) -> Thwarting(reeba))\nforall x (Confide(x, reeba) and Confide(reeba, tarah) -> not Kibosh(tarah, allyce))\n\nnot Prone(tarah)\n\nnot Prone(tarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "The cristabel is leibnizian. The cristabel is travelable. The cristabel does not need the toddy. The cristabel miaou the gerry. The cristabel miaou the toddy. The cristabel treat the gerry. The cristabel does not visit the toddy. The gerry escalate the cristabel. The gerry escalate the toddy. The gerry treat the cristabel. The toddy is leibnizian. The toddy is travelable. The toddy escalate the cristabel. The toddy miaou the cristabel. The toddy treat the gerry. If something treat the cristabel and it does not see the gerry then the cristabel is leibnizian. If something is leibnizian and it treat the toddy then it miaou the toddy. If the toddy miaou the gerry then the gerry is travelable. If something treat the cristabel and it is alpestrine then the cristabel does not visit the gerry. If something treat the cristabel and it is gradual then it is captious. If something is alpestrine then it treat the toddy. If something treat the gerry and the gerry escalate the toddy then the toddy is alpestrine. If something miaou the toddy and the toddy miaou the gerry then the gerry does not need the cristabel. The gerry is alpestrine.", "logic": "\nLeibnizian(cristabel)\nTravelable(cristabel)\nnot Escalate(cristabel, toddy)\nMiaou(cristabel, gerry)\nMiaou(cristabel, toddy)\nTreat(cristabel, gerry)\nnot Treat(cristabel, toddy)\nEscalate(gerry, cristabel)\nEscalate(gerry, toddy)\nTreat(gerry, cristabel)\nLeibnizian(toddy)\nTravelable(toddy)\nEscalate(toddy, cristabel)\nMiaou(toddy, cristabel)\nTreat(toddy, gerry)\nforall x (Treat(x, cristabel) and not Miaou(x, gerry) -> Leibnizian(cristabel))\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) and Treat(x, toddy) -> Miaou(x, toddy))\nMiaou(toddy, gerry) -> Travelable(gerry)\nforall x (Treat(x, cristabel) and Alpestrine(x) -> not Treat(cristabel, gerry))\nforall x (Treat(x, cristabel) and Gradual(x) -> Captious(x))\nforall x (Alpestrine(x) -> Treat(x, toddy))\nforall x (Treat(x, gerry) and Escalate(gerry, toddy) -> Alpestrine(toddy))\nforall x (Miaou(x, toddy) and Miaou(toddy, gerry) -> not Escalate(gerry, cristabel))\n\nAlpestrine(gerry)\n\nAlpestrine(gerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-107"} {"premises": "Bell is unleaded. Bell is unthawed. Sigfrid is unchewable. Sigfrid is unleaded. Sigfrid is lebanese. Sigfrid is ghostly. Sigfrid is uveal. Sigfrid is unthawed. Sigfrid is promising. Fredrick is unchewable. Fredrick is unleaded. Fredrick is lebanese. Fredrick is ghostly. Fredrick is uveal. Fredrick is unthawed. Fredrick is promising. If Sigfrid is unchewable then Sigfrid is unleaded. All unthawed, lebanese things are unchewable. If something is unleaded and uveal then it is promising. All lebanese things are uveal. If something is promising then it is uveal. If something is unleaded and unthawed then it is lebanese. All ghostly, unchewable things are uveal. Round things are lebanese. Sigfrid is unleaded.", "logic": "\nUnleaded(bell)\nUnthawed(bell)\nUnchewable(sigfrid)\nUnleaded(sigfrid)\nLebanese(sigfrid)\nGhostly(sigfrid)\nUveal(sigfrid)\nUnthawed(sigfrid)\nPromising(sigfrid)\nUnchewable(fredrick)\nUnleaded(fredrick)\nLebanese(fredrick)\nGhostly(fredrick)\nUveal(fredrick)\nUnthawed(fredrick)\nPromising(fredrick)\nUnchewable(sigfrid) -> Unleaded(sigfrid)\nforall x (Unthawed(x) and Lebanese(x) -> Unchewable(x))\nforall x (Unleaded(x) and Uveal(x) -> Promising(x))\nforall x (Lebanese(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Promising(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Unleaded(x) and Unthawed(x) -> Lebanese(x))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) and Unchewable(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Promising(x) -> Lebanese(x))\n\nUnleaded(sigfrid)\n\ntherefore Unleaded(sigfrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Sheree is cheap. Sheree is denary. Omar is totipotent. Omar is cheap. Omar is wriggly. Omar is injectable. Omar is submarine. Omar is denary. Omar is anestric. Wain is totipotent. Wain is cheap. Wain is wriggly. Wain is injectable. Wain is submarine. Wain is denary. Wain is anestric. If Omar is totipotent then Omar is cheap. All denary, wriggly things are totipotent. If something is cheap and submarine then it is anestric. All wriggly things are submarine. If something is anestric then it is submarine. If something is cheap and denary then it is wriggly. All injectable, totipotent things are submarine. Round things are wriggly. Omar is not cheap.", "logic": "\nCheap(sheree)\nDenary(sheree)\nTotipotent(omar)\nCheap(omar)\nWriggly(omar)\nInjectable(omar)\nSubmarine(omar)\nDenary(omar)\nAnestric(omar)\nTotipotent(wain)\nCheap(wain)\nWriggly(wain)\nInjectable(wain)\nSubmarine(wain)\nDenary(wain)\nAnestric(wain)\nTotipotent(omar) -> Cheap(omar)\nforall x (Denary(x) and Wriggly(x) -> Totipotent(x))\nforall x (Cheap(x) and Submarine(x) -> Anestric(x))\nforall x (Wriggly(x) -> Submarine(x))\nforall x (Anestric(x) -> Submarine(x))\nforall x (Cheap(x) and Denary(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Injectable(x) and Totipotent(x) -> Submarine(x))\nforall x (Anestric(x) -> Wriggly(x))\n\nnot Cheap(omar)\n\ntherefore Cheap(omar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Niles is smothered. Niles is preset. Sidnee is cautionary. Sidnee is smothered. Sidnee is centesimal. Sidnee is botryoidal. Sidnee is unbalanced. Sidnee is preset. Sidnee is hydroxy. Rod is cautionary. Rod is smothered. Rod is centesimal. Rod is botryoidal. Rod is unbalanced. Rod is preset. Rod is hydroxy. If Sidnee is cautionary then Sidnee is smothered. All preset, centesimal things are cautionary. If something is smothered and unbalanced then it is hydroxy. All centesimal things are unbalanced. If something is hydroxy then it is unbalanced. If something is smothered and preset then it is centesimal. All botryoidal, cautionary things are unbalanced. Round things are centesimal. Niles is centesimal.", "logic": "\nSmothered(niles)\nPreset(niles)\nCautionary(sidnee)\nSmothered(sidnee)\nCentesimal(sidnee)\nBotryoidal(sidnee)\nUnbalanced(sidnee)\nPreset(sidnee)\nHydroxy(sidnee)\nCautionary(rod)\nSmothered(rod)\nCentesimal(rod)\nBotryoidal(rod)\nUnbalanced(rod)\nPreset(rod)\nHydroxy(rod)\nCautionary(sidnee) -> Smothered(sidnee)\nforall x (Preset(x) and Centesimal(x) -> Cautionary(x))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and Unbalanced(x) -> Hydroxy(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and Preset(x) -> Centesimal(x))\nforall x (Botryoidal(x) and Cautionary(x) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Centesimal(x))\n\nCentesimal(niles)\n\nSmothered(niles) and Preset(niles) and forall x (Smothered(x) and Preset(x) -> Centesimal(x)) -> therefore Centesimal(niles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Donn is conceptual. Donn is frenetic. Dottie is oddish. Dottie is conceptual. Dottie is splayfoot. Dottie is fleshly. Dottie is assistant. Dottie is frenetic. Dottie is setose. Ginnie is oddish. Ginnie is conceptual. Ginnie is splayfoot. Ginnie is fleshly. Ginnie is assistant. Ginnie is frenetic. Ginnie is setose. If Dottie is oddish then Dottie is conceptual. All frenetic, splayfoot things are oddish. If something is conceptual and assistant then it is setose. All splayfoot things are assistant. If something is setose then it is assistant. If something is conceptual and frenetic then it is splayfoot. All fleshly, oddish things are assistant. Round things are splayfoot. Donn is not splayfoot.", "logic": "\nConceptual(donn)\nFrenetic(donn)\nOddish(dottie)\nConceptual(dottie)\nSplayfoot(dottie)\nFleshly(dottie)\nAssistant(dottie)\nFrenetic(dottie)\nSetose(dottie)\nOddish(ginnie)\nConceptual(ginnie)\nSplayfoot(ginnie)\nFleshly(ginnie)\nAssistant(ginnie)\nFrenetic(ginnie)\nSetose(ginnie)\nOddish(dottie) -> Conceptual(dottie)\nforall x (Frenetic(x) and Splayfoot(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Assistant(x) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) -> Assistant(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Assistant(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) and Oddish(x) -> Assistant(x))\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\n\nnot Splayfoot(donn)\n\nConceptual(donn) and Frenetic(donn) and forall x (Conceptual(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Splayfoot(x)) -> therefore Splayfoot(donn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Tonie is unlaureled. Tonie is heroic. Austen is thorny. Austen is unlaureled. Austen is antarctic. Austen is jarring. Austen is quilted. Austen is heroic. Austen is comestible. Tilda is thorny. Tilda is unlaureled. Tilda is antarctic. Tilda is jarring. Tilda is quilted. Tilda is heroic. Tilda is comestible. If Austen is thorny then Austen is unlaureled. All heroic, antarctic things are thorny. If something is unlaureled and quilted then it is comestible. All antarctic things are quilted. If something is comestible then it is quilted. If something is unlaureled and heroic then it is antarctic. All jarring, thorny things are quilted. Round things are antarctic. Tonie is quilted.", "logic": "\nUnlaureled(tonie)\nHeroic(tonie)\nThorny(austen)\nUnlaureled(austen)\nAntarctic(austen)\nJarring(austen)\nQuilted(austen)\nHeroic(austen)\nComestible(austen)\nThorny(tilda)\nUnlaureled(tilda)\nAntarctic(tilda)\nJarring(tilda)\nQuilted(tilda)\nHeroic(tilda)\nComestible(tilda)\nThorny(austen) -> Unlaureled(austen)\nforall x (Heroic(x) and Antarctic(x) -> Thorny(x))\nforall x (Unlaureled(x) and Quilted(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Antarctic(x) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Unlaureled(x) and Heroic(x) -> Antarctic(x))\nforall x (Jarring(x) and Thorny(x) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Antarctic(x))\n\nQuilted(tonie)\n\nUnlaureled(tonie) and Heroic(tonie) and forall x (Unlaureled(x) and Heroic(x) -> Antarctic(x)) -> therefore Antarctic(tonie) Antarctic(tonie) and forall x (Antarctic(x) -> Quilted(x)) -> therefore Quilted(tonie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Marika is expectant. Marika is couthy. Delia is voracious. Delia is expectant. Delia is musing. Delia is unowned. Delia is supersonic. Delia is couthy. Delia is partizan. Brigida is voracious. Brigida is expectant. Brigida is musing. Brigida is unowned. Brigida is supersonic. Brigida is couthy. Brigida is partizan. If Delia is voracious then Delia is expectant. All couthy, musing things are voracious. If something is expectant and supersonic then it is partizan. All musing things are supersonic. If something is partizan then it is supersonic. If something is expectant and couthy then it is musing. All unowned, voracious things are supersonic. Round things are musing. Marika is not voracious.", "logic": "\nExpectant(marika)\nCouthy(marika)\nVoracious(delia)\nExpectant(delia)\nMusing(delia)\nUnowned(delia)\nSupersonic(delia)\nCouthy(delia)\nPartizan(delia)\nVoracious(brigida)\nExpectant(brigida)\nMusing(brigida)\nUnowned(brigida)\nSupersonic(brigida)\nCouthy(brigida)\nPartizan(brigida)\nVoracious(delia) -> Expectant(delia)\nforall x (Couthy(x) and Musing(x) -> Voracious(x))\nforall x (Expectant(x) and Supersonic(x) -> Partizan(x))\nforall x (Musing(x) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Expectant(x) and Couthy(x) -> Musing(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) and Voracious(x) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> Musing(x))\n\nnot Voracious(marika)\n\nExpectant(marika) and Couthy(marika) and forall x (Expectant(x) and Couthy(x) -> Musing(x)) -> therefore Musing(marika) Couthy(marika) and Musing(marika) and forall x (Couthy(x) and Musing(x) -> Voracious(x)) -> therefore Voracious(marika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Standford is fatty. Standford is braided. Olaf is macro. Olaf is fatty. Olaf is glazed. Olaf is leaded. Olaf is crimson. Olaf is braided. Olaf is conveyable. Brandise is macro. Brandise is fatty. Brandise is glazed. Brandise is leaded. Brandise is crimson. Brandise is braided. Brandise is conveyable. If Olaf is macro then Olaf is fatty. All braided, glazed things are macro. If something is fatty and crimson then it is conveyable. All glazed things are crimson. If something is conveyable then it is crimson. If something is fatty and braided then it is glazed. All leaded, macro things are crimson. Round things are glazed. Standford is conveyable.", "logic": "\nFatty(standford)\nBraided(standford)\nMacro(olaf)\nFatty(olaf)\nGlazed(olaf)\nLeaded(olaf)\nCrimson(olaf)\nBraided(olaf)\nConveyable(olaf)\nMacro(brandise)\nFatty(brandise)\nGlazed(brandise)\nLeaded(brandise)\nCrimson(brandise)\nBraided(brandise)\nConveyable(brandise)\nMacro(olaf) -> Fatty(olaf)\nforall x (Braided(x) and Glazed(x) -> Macro(x))\nforall x (Fatty(x) and Crimson(x) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Glazed(x) -> Crimson(x))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Crimson(x))\nforall x (Fatty(x) and Braided(x) -> Glazed(x))\nforall x (Leaded(x) and Macro(x) -> Crimson(x))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Glazed(x))\n\nConveyable(standford)\n\nFatty(standford) and Braided(standford) and forall x (Fatty(x) and Braided(x) -> Glazed(x)) -> therefore Glazed(standford) Glazed(standford) and forall x (Glazed(x) -> Crimson(x)) -> therefore Crimson(standford) Fatty(standford) and Crimson(standford) and forall x (Fatty(x) and Crimson(x) -> Conveyable(x)) -> therefore Conveyable(standford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "Joelle is bouffant. Joelle is campy. Sascha is powerful. Sascha is bouffant. Sascha is polyphonic. Sascha is northerly. Sascha is plumlike. Sascha is campy. Sascha is transitory. Eirena is powerful. Eirena is bouffant. Eirena is polyphonic. Eirena is northerly. Eirena is plumlike. Eirena is campy. Eirena is transitory. If Sascha is powerful then Sascha is bouffant. All campy, polyphonic things are powerful. If something is bouffant and plumlike then it is transitory. All polyphonic things are plumlike. If something is transitory then it is plumlike. If something is bouffant and campy then it is polyphonic. All northerly, powerful things are plumlike. Round things are polyphonic. Joelle is not transitory.", "logic": "\nBouffant(joelle)\nCampy(joelle)\nPowerful(sascha)\nBouffant(sascha)\nPolyphonic(sascha)\nNortherly(sascha)\nPlumlike(sascha)\nCampy(sascha)\nTransitory(sascha)\nPowerful(eirena)\nBouffant(eirena)\nPolyphonic(eirena)\nNortherly(eirena)\nPlumlike(eirena)\nCampy(eirena)\nTransitory(eirena)\nPowerful(sascha) -> Bouffant(sascha)\nforall x (Campy(x) and Polyphonic(x) -> Powerful(x))\nforall x (Bouffant(x) and Plumlike(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Polyphonic(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Bouffant(x) and Campy(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\nforall x (Northerly(x) and Powerful(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\n\nnot Transitory(joelle)\n\nBouffant(joelle) and Campy(joelle) and forall x (Bouffant(x) and Campy(x) -> Polyphonic(x)) -> therefore Polyphonic(joelle) Polyphonic(joelle) and forall x (Polyphonic(x) -> Plumlike(x)) -> therefore Plumlike(joelle) Bouffant(joelle) and Plumlike(joelle) and forall x (Bouffant(x) and Plumlike(x) -> Transitory(x)) -> therefore Transitory(joelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1884"} {"premises": "The maurise does not chase the gael. The maurise unearth the gael. The gael rejuvenate the maurise. If something unearth the maurise then the maurise rejuvenate the gael. If something rejuvenate the maurise then the maurise rejuvenate the gael. If something envenom the gael then it rejuvenate the gael. If the gael rejuvenate the maurise and the maurise does not eat the gael then the maurise is dianoetic. If the maurise envenom the gael and the gael rejuvenate the maurise then the maurise is wrought. If something is dianoetic and not startling then it rejuvenate the maurise. The maurise does not chase the gael.", "logic": "\nnot Envenom(maurise, gael)\nUnearth(maurise, gael)\nRejuvenate(gael, maurise)\nforall x (Unearth(x, maurise) -> Rejuvenate(maurise, gael))\nforall x (Rejuvenate(x, maurise) -> Rejuvenate(maurise, gael))\nforall x (Envenom(x, gael) -> Rejuvenate(x, gael))\nRejuvenate(gael, maurise) and not Unearth(maurise, gael) -> Dianoetic(maurise)\nEnvenom(maurise, gael) and Rejuvenate(gael, maurise) -> Wrought(maurise)\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) and not Startling(x) -> Rejuvenate(x, maurise))\n\nnot Envenom(maurise, gael)\n\ntherefore not Envenom(maurise, gael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "The beaufort does not chase the emmalee. The beaufort campaign the emmalee. The emmalee appose the beaufort. If something campaign the beaufort then the beaufort appose the emmalee. If something appose the beaufort then the beaufort appose the emmalee. If something anathemize the emmalee then it appose the emmalee. If the emmalee appose the beaufort and the beaufort does not eat the emmalee then the beaufort is imaginable. If the beaufort anathemize the emmalee and the emmalee appose the beaufort then the beaufort is aluminous. If something is imaginable and not conversant then it appose the beaufort. The beaufort does not eat the emmalee.", "logic": "\nnot Anathemize(beaufort, emmalee)\nCampaign(beaufort, emmalee)\nAppose(emmalee, beaufort)\nforall x (Campaign(x, beaufort) -> Appose(beaufort, emmalee))\nforall x (Appose(x, beaufort) -> Appose(beaufort, emmalee))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, emmalee) -> Appose(x, emmalee))\nAppose(emmalee, beaufort) and not Campaign(beaufort, emmalee) -> Imaginable(beaufort)\nAnathemize(beaufort, emmalee) and Appose(emmalee, beaufort) -> Aluminous(beaufort)\nforall x (Imaginable(x) and not Conversant(x) -> Appose(x, beaufort))\n\nnot Campaign(beaufort, emmalee)\n\ntherefore Campaign(beaufort, emmalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "The enya does not chase the ichabod. The enya unsanctify the ichabod. The ichabod breastfeed the enya. If something unsanctify the enya then the enya breastfeed the ichabod. If something breastfeed the enya then the enya breastfeed the ichabod. If something research the ichabod then it breastfeed the ichabod. If the ichabod breastfeed the enya and the enya does not eat the ichabod then the enya is swarthy. If the enya research the ichabod and the ichabod breastfeed the enya then the enya is warming. If something is swarthy and not rolling then it breastfeed the enya. The enya breastfeed the ichabod.", "logic": "\nnot Research(enya, ichabod)\nUnsanctify(enya, ichabod)\nBreastfeed(ichabod, enya)\nforall x (Unsanctify(x, enya) -> Breastfeed(enya, ichabod))\nforall x (Breastfeed(x, enya) -> Breastfeed(enya, ichabod))\nforall x (Research(x, ichabod) -> Breastfeed(x, ichabod))\nBreastfeed(ichabod, enya) and not Unsanctify(enya, ichabod) -> Swarthy(enya)\nResearch(enya, ichabod) and Breastfeed(ichabod, enya) -> Warming(enya)\nforall x (Swarthy(x) and not Rolling(x) -> Breastfeed(x, enya))\n\nBreastfeed(enya, ichabod)\n\nBreastfeed(ichabod, enya) and forall x (Breastfeed(x, enya) -> Breastfeed(enya, ichabod)) -> therefore Breastfeed(enya, ichabod)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "The jessalyn does not chase the arlee. The jessalyn complicate the arlee. The arlee preachify the jessalyn. If something complicate the jessalyn then the jessalyn preachify the arlee. If something preachify the jessalyn then the jessalyn preachify the arlee. If something bilk the arlee then it preachify the arlee. If the arlee preachify the jessalyn and the jessalyn does not eat the arlee then the jessalyn is unable. If the jessalyn bilk the arlee and the arlee preachify the jessalyn then the jessalyn is peltate. If something is unable and not sinusoidal then it preachify the jessalyn. The jessalyn does not need the arlee.", "logic": "\nnot Bilk(jessalyn, arlee)\nComplicate(jessalyn, arlee)\nPreachify(arlee, jessalyn)\nforall x (Complicate(x, jessalyn) -> Preachify(jessalyn, arlee))\nforall x (Preachify(x, jessalyn) -> Preachify(jessalyn, arlee))\nforall x (Bilk(x, arlee) -> Preachify(x, arlee))\nPreachify(arlee, jessalyn) and not Complicate(jessalyn, arlee) -> Unable(jessalyn)\nBilk(jessalyn, arlee) and Preachify(arlee, jessalyn) -> Peltate(jessalyn)\nforall x (Unable(x) and not Sinusoidal(x) -> Preachify(x, jessalyn))\n\nnot Preachify(jessalyn, arlee)\n\nPreachify(arlee, jessalyn) and forall x (Preachify(x, jessalyn) -> Preachify(jessalyn, arlee)) -> therefore Preachify(jessalyn, arlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "The zilvia does not chase the ethelbert. The zilvia liquidize the ethelbert. The ethelbert resuspend the zilvia. If something liquidize the zilvia then the zilvia resuspend the ethelbert. If something resuspend the zilvia then the zilvia resuspend the ethelbert. If something contract the ethelbert then it resuspend the ethelbert. If the ethelbert resuspend the zilvia and the zilvia does not eat the ethelbert then the zilvia is ocher. If the zilvia contract the ethelbert and the ethelbert resuspend the zilvia then the zilvia is armorial. If something is ocher and not mirky then it resuspend the zilvia. The zilvia is not ocher.", "logic": "\nnot Contract(zilvia, ethelbert)\nLiquidize(zilvia, ethelbert)\nResuspend(ethelbert, zilvia)\nforall x (Liquidize(x, zilvia) -> Resuspend(zilvia, ethelbert))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, zilvia) -> Resuspend(zilvia, ethelbert))\nforall x (Contract(x, ethelbert) -> Resuspend(x, ethelbert))\nResuspend(ethelbert, zilvia) and not Liquidize(zilvia, ethelbert) -> Ocher(zilvia)\nContract(zilvia, ethelbert) and Resuspend(ethelbert, zilvia) -> Armorial(zilvia)\nforall x (Ocher(x) and not Mirky(x) -> Resuspend(x, zilvia))\n\nnot Ocher(zilvia)\n\nResuspend(ethelbert, zilvia) and not Liquidize(zilvia, ethelbert) -> Ocher(zilvia) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "The mirabella does not chase the joline. The mirabella deter the joline. The joline regularise the mirabella. If something deter the mirabella then the mirabella regularise the joline. If something regularise the mirabella then the mirabella regularise the joline. If something frizz the joline then it regularise the joline. If the joline regularise the mirabella and the mirabella does not eat the joline then the mirabella is screechy. If the mirabella frizz the joline and the joline regularise the mirabella then the mirabella is smelly. If something is screechy and not virginal then it regularise the mirabella. The mirabella is smelly.", "logic": "\nnot Frizz(mirabella, joline)\nDeter(mirabella, joline)\nRegularise(joline, mirabella)\nforall x (Deter(x, mirabella) -> Regularise(mirabella, joline))\nforall x (Regularise(x, mirabella) -> Regularise(mirabella, joline))\nforall x (Frizz(x, joline) -> Regularise(x, joline))\nRegularise(joline, mirabella) and not Deter(mirabella, joline) -> Screechy(mirabella)\nFrizz(mirabella, joline) and Regularise(joline, mirabella) -> Smelly(mirabella)\nforall x (Screechy(x) and not Virginal(x) -> Regularise(x, mirabella))\n\nSmelly(mirabella)\n\nFrizz(mirabella, joline) and Regularise(joline, mirabella) -> Smelly(mirabella) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "The ginnie does not chase the kendal. The ginnie relapse the kendal. The kendal canal the ginnie. If something relapse the ginnie then the ginnie canal the kendal. If something canal the ginnie then the ginnie canal the kendal. If something blindside the kendal then it canal the kendal. If the kendal canal the ginnie and the ginnie does not eat the kendal then the ginnie is repulsive. If the ginnie blindside the kendal and the kendal canal the ginnie then the ginnie is nuts. If something is repulsive and not million then it canal the ginnie. The ginnie does not eat the ginnie.", "logic": "\nnot Blindside(ginnie, kendal)\nRelapse(ginnie, kendal)\nCanal(kendal, ginnie)\nforall x (Relapse(x, ginnie) -> Canal(ginnie, kendal))\nforall x (Canal(x, ginnie) -> Canal(ginnie, kendal))\nforall x (Blindside(x, kendal) -> Canal(x, kendal))\nCanal(kendal, ginnie) and not Relapse(ginnie, kendal) -> Repulsive(ginnie)\nBlindside(ginnie, kendal) and Canal(kendal, ginnie) -> Nuts(ginnie)\nforall x (Repulsive(x) and not Million(x) -> Canal(x, ginnie))\n\nnot Relapse(ginnie, ginnie)\n\nnot Relapse(ginnie, ginnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "The delbert does not chase the bree. The delbert tantalise the bree. The bree equivocate the delbert. If something tantalise the delbert then the delbert equivocate the bree. If something equivocate the delbert then the delbert equivocate the bree. If something abound the bree then it equivocate the bree. If the bree equivocate the delbert and the delbert does not eat the bree then the delbert is kurdish. If the delbert abound the bree and the bree equivocate the delbert then the delbert is irregular. If something is kurdish and not contralto then it equivocate the delbert. The bree is irregular.", "logic": "\nnot Abound(delbert, bree)\nTantalise(delbert, bree)\nEquivocate(bree, delbert)\nforall x (Tantalise(x, delbert) -> Equivocate(delbert, bree))\nforall x (Equivocate(x, delbert) -> Equivocate(delbert, bree))\nforall x (Abound(x, bree) -> Equivocate(x, bree))\nEquivocate(bree, delbert) and not Tantalise(delbert, bree) -> Kurdish(delbert)\nAbound(delbert, bree) and Equivocate(bree, delbert) -> Irregular(delbert)\nforall x (Kurdish(x) and not Contralto(x) -> Equivocate(x, delbert))\n\nIrregular(bree)\n\nIrregular(bree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-98"} {"premises": "Meta is stained. Meta is master. Meta is flavourful. Demetris is serene. Latashia is not serene. Cindee is stained. Cindee is lacustrine. All lacustrine, flavourful people are bursal. Kind, flavourful people are lacustrine. All lacustrine, bursal people are premarital. Latashia is not serene.", "logic": "\nStained(meta)\nMaster(meta)\nFlavourful(meta)\nSerene(demetris)\nnot Serene(latashia)\nStained(cindee)\nLacustrine(cindee)\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) and Flavourful(x) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Stained(x) and Flavourful(x) -> Lacustrine(x))\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) and Bursal(x) -> Premarital(x))\n\nnot Serene(latashia)\n\ntherefore not Serene(latashia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Shayne is grizzly. Shayne is ebullient. Shayne is acidotic. Cortney is thwarted. Ehud is not thwarted. Trina is grizzly. Trina is schismatic. All schismatic, acidotic people are avid. Kind, acidotic people are schismatic. All schismatic, avid people are elite. Shayne is not grizzly.", "logic": "\nGrizzly(shayne)\nEbullient(shayne)\nAcidotic(shayne)\nThwarted(cortney)\nnot Thwarted(ehud)\nGrizzly(trina)\nSchismatic(trina)\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and Acidotic(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Grizzly(x) and Acidotic(x) -> Schismatic(x))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and Avid(x) -> Elite(x))\n\nnot Grizzly(shayne)\n\ntherefore Grizzly(shayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Dewey is delineate. Dewey is obligated. Dewey is unstained. Eda is wrothful. Cariotta is not wrothful. Rochella is delineate. Rochella is vengeful. All vengeful, unstained people are binaural. Kind, unstained people are vengeful. All vengeful, binaural people are sapid. Dewey is vengeful.", "logic": "\nDelineate(dewey)\nObligated(dewey)\nUnstained(dewey)\nWrothful(eda)\nnot Wrothful(cariotta)\nDelineate(rochella)\nVengeful(rochella)\nforall x (Vengeful(x) and Unstained(x) -> Binaural(x))\nforall x (Delineate(x) and Unstained(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Vengeful(x) and Binaural(x) -> Sapid(x))\n\nVengeful(dewey)\n\nDelineate(dewey) and Unstained(dewey) and forall x (Delineate(x) and Unstained(x) -> Vengeful(x)) -> therefore Vengeful(dewey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Lucy is insolvable. Lucy is multiphase. Lucy is albinal. Ginnie is tardive. Montague is not tardive. Kaye is insolvable. Kaye is fatalist. All fatalist, albinal people are umptieth. Kind, albinal people are fatalist. All fatalist, umptieth people are corporeal. Lucy is not fatalist.", "logic": "\nInsolvable(lucy)\nMultiphase(lucy)\nAlbinal(lucy)\nTardive(ginnie)\nnot Tardive(montague)\nInsolvable(kaye)\nFatalist(kaye)\nforall x (Fatalist(x) and Albinal(x) -> Umptieth(x))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Albinal(x) -> Fatalist(x))\nforall x (Fatalist(x) and Umptieth(x) -> Corporeal(x))\n\nnot Fatalist(lucy)\n\nInsolvable(lucy) and Albinal(lucy) and forall x (Insolvable(x) and Albinal(x) -> Fatalist(x)) -> therefore Fatalist(lucy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Eve is literate. Eve is bisontine. Eve is trying. Elsi is brumous. Uri is not brumous. Welby is literate. Welby is secret. All secret, trying people are prone. Kind, trying people are secret. All secret, prone people are elapsed. Eve is prone.", "logic": "\nLiterate(eve)\nBisontine(eve)\nTrying(eve)\nBrumous(elsi)\nnot Brumous(uri)\nLiterate(welby)\nSecret(welby)\nforall x (Secret(x) and Trying(x) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Literate(x) and Trying(x) -> Secret(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) and Prone(x) -> Elapsed(x))\n\nProne(eve)\n\nLiterate(eve) and Trying(eve) and forall x (Literate(x) and Trying(x) -> Secret(x)) -> therefore Secret(eve) Secret(eve) and Trying(eve) and forall x (Secret(x) and Trying(x) -> Prone(x)) -> therefore Prone(eve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Angelo is silverish. Angelo is nibbed. Angelo is unusual. Emyle is polyatomic. Cilka is not polyatomic. Kiele is silverish. Kiele is placental. All placental, unusual people are sulky. Kind, unusual people are placental. All placental, sulky people are garlicky. Angelo is not sulky.", "logic": "\nSilverish(angelo)\nNibbed(angelo)\nUnusual(angelo)\nPolyatomic(emyle)\nnot Polyatomic(cilka)\nSilverish(kiele)\nPlacental(kiele)\nforall x (Placental(x) and Unusual(x) -> Sulky(x))\nforall x (Silverish(x) and Unusual(x) -> Placental(x))\nforall x (Placental(x) and Sulky(x) -> Garlicky(x))\n\nnot Sulky(angelo)\n\nSilverish(angelo) and Unusual(angelo) and forall x (Silverish(x) and Unusual(x) -> Placental(x)) -> therefore Placental(angelo) Placental(angelo) and Unusual(angelo) and forall x (Placental(x) and Unusual(x) -> Sulky(x)) -> therefore Sulky(angelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Trina is impugnable. Trina is unrefined. Trina is dewy. Willmott is unplumbed. Nance is not unplumbed. Huntley is impugnable. Huntley is invalid. All invalid, dewy people are chinked. Kind, dewy people are invalid. All invalid, chinked people are faux. Trina is faux.", "logic": "\nImpugnable(trina)\nUnrefined(trina)\nDewy(trina)\nUnplumbed(willmott)\nnot Unplumbed(nance)\nImpugnable(huntley)\nInvalid(huntley)\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Dewy(x) -> Chinked(x))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) and Dewy(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Chinked(x) -> Faux(x))\n\nFaux(trina)\n\nImpugnable(trina) and Dewy(trina) and forall x (Impugnable(x) and Dewy(x) -> Invalid(x)) -> therefore Invalid(trina) Impugnable(trina) and Dewy(trina) and forall x (Impugnable(x) and Dewy(x) -> Invalid(x)) -> therefore Invalid(trina) Invalid(trina) and Dewy(trina) and forall x (Invalid(x) and Dewy(x) -> Chinked(x)) -> therefore Chinked(trina) Invalid(trina) and Chinked(trina) and forall x (Invalid(x) and Chinked(x) -> Faux(x)) -> therefore Faux(trina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Benjamen is magyar. Benjamen is dormant. Benjamen is lactic. Sterling is tearaway. Maurits is not tearaway. Vida is magyar. Vida is dismissive. All dismissive, lactic people are fledgling. Kind, lactic people are dismissive. All dismissive, fledgling people are adorned. Benjamen is not adorned.", "logic": "\nMagyar(benjamen)\nDormant(benjamen)\nLactic(benjamen)\nTearaway(sterling)\nnot Tearaway(maurits)\nMagyar(vida)\nDismissive(vida)\nforall x (Dismissive(x) and Lactic(x) -> Fledgling(x))\nforall x (Magyar(x) and Lactic(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Dismissive(x) and Fledgling(x) -> Adorned(x))\n\nnot Adorned(benjamen)\n\nMagyar(benjamen) and Lactic(benjamen) and forall x (Magyar(x) and Lactic(x) -> Dismissive(x)) -> therefore Dismissive(benjamen) Magyar(benjamen) and Lactic(benjamen) and forall x (Magyar(x) and Lactic(x) -> Dismissive(x)) -> therefore Dismissive(benjamen) Dismissive(benjamen) and Lactic(benjamen) and forall x (Dismissive(x) and Lactic(x) -> Fledgling(x)) -> therefore Fledgling(benjamen) Dismissive(benjamen) and Fledgling(benjamen) and forall x (Dismissive(x) and Fledgling(x) -> Adorned(x)) -> therefore Adorned(benjamen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Hannis is proven. Hannis is multiphase. Hannis is grouped. Tallie is thyroid. Whitney is not thyroid. Laurette is proven. Laurette is unwise. All unwise, grouped people are carboxyl. Kind, grouped people are unwise. All unwise, carboxyl people are admissible. Laurette is not carboxyl.", "logic": "\nProven(hannis)\nMultiphase(hannis)\nGrouped(hannis)\nThyroid(tallie)\nnot Thyroid(whitney)\nProven(laurette)\nUnwise(laurette)\nforall x (Unwise(x) and Grouped(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Proven(x) and Grouped(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Unwise(x) and Carboxyl(x) -> Admissible(x))\n\nnot Carboxyl(laurette)\n\nforall x (Unwise(x) and Grouped(x) -> Carboxyl(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Minette is protestant. Minette is esurient. Minette is withering. Jodie is reflexive. Angelico is not reflexive. Secunda is protestant. Secunda is advanced. All advanced, withering people are loaded. Kind, withering people are advanced. All advanced, loaded people are hematal. Jodie is advanced.", "logic": "\nProtestant(minette)\nEsurient(minette)\nWithering(minette)\nReflexive(jodie)\nnot Reflexive(angelico)\nProtestant(secunda)\nAdvanced(secunda)\nforall x (Advanced(x) and Withering(x) -> Loaded(x))\nforall x (Protestant(x) and Withering(x) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) and Loaded(x) -> Hematal(x))\n\nAdvanced(jodie)\n\nforall x (Protestant(x) and Withering(x) -> Advanced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Ericha is wretched. Ericha is destined. Ericha is rotatable. Bunnie is ashen. Shawnee is not ashen. Star is wretched. Star is airless. All airless, rotatable people are only. Kind, rotatable people are airless. All airless, only people are married. Bunnie is not married.", "logic": "\nWretched(ericha)\nDestined(ericha)\nRotatable(ericha)\nAshen(bunnie)\nnot Ashen(shawnee)\nWretched(star)\nAirless(star)\nforall x (Airless(x) and Rotatable(x) -> Only(x))\nforall x (Wretched(x) and Rotatable(x) -> Airless(x))\nforall x (Airless(x) and Only(x) -> Married(x))\n\nnot Married(bunnie)\n\nforall x (Airless(x) and Only(x) -> Married(x)) <- forall x (Wretched(x) and Rotatable(x) -> Airless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Darren is webby. Darren is stooped. Darren is ribless. Alisha is cadenced. Hudson is not cadenced. Gina is webby. Gina is untrue. All untrue, ribless people are soapy. Kind, ribless people are untrue. All untrue, soapy people are truthful. Gina is truthful.", "logic": "\nWebby(darren)\nStooped(darren)\nRibless(darren)\nCadenced(alisha)\nnot Cadenced(hudson)\nWebby(gina)\nUntrue(gina)\nforall x (Untrue(x) and Ribless(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Webby(x) and Ribless(x) -> Untrue(x))\nforall x (Untrue(x) and Soapy(x) -> Truthful(x))\n\nTruthful(gina)\n\nforall x (Untrue(x) and Soapy(x) -> Truthful(x)) <- forall x (Untrue(x) and Ribless(x) -> Soapy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Haleigh is disarrayed. Haleigh is untoward. Haleigh is untenable. Miguelita is clunky. Adrien is not clunky. Nicola is disarrayed. Nicola is chaste. All chaste, untenable people are spooky. Kind, untenable people are chaste. All chaste, spooky people are endurable. Miguelita is not disarrayed.", "logic": "\nDisarrayed(haleigh)\nUntoward(haleigh)\nUntenable(haleigh)\nClunky(miguelita)\nnot Clunky(adrien)\nDisarrayed(nicola)\nChaste(nicola)\nforall x (Chaste(x) and Untenable(x) -> Spooky(x))\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) and Untenable(x) -> Chaste(x))\nforall x (Chaste(x) and Spooky(x) -> Endurable(x))\n\nnot Disarrayed(miguelita)\n\nnot Disarrayed(miguelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Selestina is pale. Selestina is graduated. Selestina is monodical. Jermaine is cleft. Faith is not cleft. Herold is pale. Herold is palpebrate. All palpebrate, monodical people are slimy. Kind, monodical people are palpebrate. All palpebrate, slimy people are monochrome. Faith is graduated.", "logic": "\nPale(selestina)\nGraduated(selestina)\nMonodical(selestina)\nCleft(jermaine)\nnot Cleft(faith)\nPale(herold)\nPalpebrate(herold)\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and Monodical(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) and Monodical(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and Slimy(x) -> Monochrome(x))\n\nGraduated(faith)\n\nGraduated(faith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Hammad is mired. Hammad is carolean. Hammad is oriental. Cain is imbricate. Tailor is not imbricate. Mamie is mired. Mamie is crooked. All crooked, oriental people are sign. Kind, oriental people are crooked. All crooked, sign people are womanlike. Mamie is not oriental.", "logic": "\nMired(hammad)\nCarolean(hammad)\nOriental(hammad)\nImbricate(cain)\nnot Imbricate(tailor)\nMired(mamie)\nCrooked(mamie)\nforall x (Crooked(x) and Oriental(x) -> Sign(x))\nforall x (Mired(x) and Oriental(x) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Crooked(x) and Sign(x) -> Womanlike(x))\n\nnot Oriental(mamie)\n\nnot Oriental(mamie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "Tulley is cationic. Tulley is ferric. Tulley is broiled. Coleen is kindly. Georgina is not kindly. Chet is cationic. Chet is aeriferous. All aeriferous, broiled people are afrikaans. Kind, broiled people are aeriferous. All aeriferous, afrikaans people are redheaded. Georgina is cationic.", "logic": "\nCationic(tulley)\nFerric(tulley)\nBroiled(tulley)\nKindly(coleen)\nnot Kindly(georgina)\nCationic(chet)\nAeriferous(chet)\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) and Broiled(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) and Broiled(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) and Afrikaans(x) -> Redheaded(x))\n\nCationic(georgina)\n\nCationic(georgina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1287"} {"premises": "The jobi is delusional. The jobi is flagging. The jobi is faced. The jobi incarnate the carolyn. The jobi metalize the carolyn. The jobi tenderize the carolyn. The carolyn is side. The carolyn is flagging. The carolyn is standing. The carolyn incarnate the jobi. The carolyn metalize the jobi. The carolyn tenderize the jobi. If something incarnate the jobi then it is side. If something is side and it incarnate the carolyn then it metalize the carolyn. If something metalize the carolyn then it is delusional. If something metalize the carolyn and it tenderize the carolyn then it is faced. If something is side then it incarnate the carolyn. If something tenderize the jobi and the jobi incarnate the carolyn then the jobi metalize the carolyn. If something incarnate the jobi then the jobi tenderize the carolyn. If something is faced then it incarnate the carolyn. The carolyn is flagging.", "logic": "\nDelusional(jobi)\nFlagging(jobi)\nFaced(jobi)\nIncarnate(jobi, carolyn)\nMetalize(jobi, carolyn)\nTenderize(jobi, carolyn)\nSide(carolyn)\nFlagging(carolyn)\nStanding(carolyn)\nIncarnate(carolyn, jobi)\nMetalize(carolyn, jobi)\nTenderize(carolyn, jobi)\nforall x (Incarnate(x, jobi) -> Side(x))\nforall x (Side(x) and Incarnate(x, carolyn) -> Metalize(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Metalize(x, carolyn) -> Delusional(x))\nforall x (Metalize(x, carolyn) and Tenderize(x, carolyn) -> Faced(x))\nforall x (Side(x) -> Incarnate(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Tenderize(x, jobi) and Incarnate(jobi, carolyn) -> Metalize(jobi, carolyn))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, jobi) -> Tenderize(jobi, carolyn))\nforall x (Faced(x) -> Incarnate(x, carolyn))\n\nFlagging(carolyn)\n\ntherefore Flagging(carolyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The ambur is neurotic. The ambur is unwrapped. The ambur is solved. The ambur remit the shirl. The ambur symphonise the shirl. The ambur crenel the shirl. The shirl is abscessed. The shirl is unwrapped. The shirl is restricted. The shirl remit the ambur. The shirl symphonise the ambur. The shirl crenel the ambur. If something remit the ambur then it is abscessed. If something is abscessed and it remit the shirl then it symphonise the shirl. If something symphonise the shirl then it is neurotic. If something symphonise the shirl and it crenel the shirl then it is solved. If something is abscessed then it remit the shirl. If something crenel the ambur and the ambur remit the shirl then the ambur symphonise the shirl. If something remit the ambur then the ambur crenel the shirl. If something is solved then it remit the shirl. The ambur does not visit the shirl.", "logic": "\nNeurotic(ambur)\nUnwrapped(ambur)\nSolved(ambur)\nRemit(ambur, shirl)\nSymphonise(ambur, shirl)\nCrenel(ambur, shirl)\nAbscessed(shirl)\nUnwrapped(shirl)\nRestricted(shirl)\nRemit(shirl, ambur)\nSymphonise(shirl, ambur)\nCrenel(shirl, ambur)\nforall x (Remit(x, ambur) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Abscessed(x) and Remit(x, shirl) -> Symphonise(x, shirl))\nforall x (Symphonise(x, shirl) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Symphonise(x, shirl) and Crenel(x, shirl) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Abscessed(x) -> Remit(x, shirl))\nforall x (Crenel(x, ambur) and Remit(ambur, shirl) -> Symphonise(ambur, shirl))\nforall x (Remit(x, ambur) -> Crenel(ambur, shirl))\nforall x (Solved(x) -> Remit(x, shirl))\n\nnot Crenel(ambur, shirl)\n\ntherefore Crenel(ambur, shirl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The arvin is convulsive. The arvin is nordic. The arvin is interfaith. The arvin tone the gwendolyn. The arvin decapitate the gwendolyn. The arvin suntan the gwendolyn. The gwendolyn is untempting. The gwendolyn is nordic. The gwendolyn is isentropic. The gwendolyn tone the arvin. The gwendolyn decapitate the arvin. The gwendolyn suntan the arvin. If something tone the arvin then it is untempting. If something is untempting and it tone the gwendolyn then it decapitate the gwendolyn. If something decapitate the gwendolyn then it is convulsive. If something decapitate the gwendolyn and it suntan the gwendolyn then it is interfaith. If something is untempting then it tone the gwendolyn. If something suntan the arvin and the arvin tone the gwendolyn then the arvin decapitate the gwendolyn. If something tone the arvin then the arvin suntan the gwendolyn. If something is interfaith then it tone the gwendolyn. The gwendolyn tone the gwendolyn.", "logic": "\nConvulsive(arvin)\nNordic(arvin)\nInterfaith(arvin)\nTone(arvin, gwendolyn)\nDecapitate(arvin, gwendolyn)\nSuntan(arvin, gwendolyn)\nUntempting(gwendolyn)\nNordic(gwendolyn)\nIsentropic(gwendolyn)\nTone(gwendolyn, arvin)\nDecapitate(gwendolyn, arvin)\nSuntan(gwendolyn, arvin)\nforall x (Tone(x, arvin) -> Untempting(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) and Tone(x, gwendolyn) -> Decapitate(x, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Decapitate(x, gwendolyn) -> Convulsive(x))\nforall x (Decapitate(x, gwendolyn) and Suntan(x, gwendolyn) -> Interfaith(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> Tone(x, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Suntan(x, arvin) and Tone(arvin, gwendolyn) -> Decapitate(arvin, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Tone(x, arvin) -> Suntan(arvin, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Interfaith(x) -> Tone(x, gwendolyn))\n\nTone(gwendolyn, gwendolyn)\n\nUntempting(gwendolyn) and forall x (Untempting(x) -> Tone(x, gwendolyn)) -> therefore Tone(gwendolyn, gwendolyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The marris is chaldee. The marris is nonkosher. The marris is narcotised. The marris deodorise the winford. The marris spondaise the winford. The marris peer the winford. The winford is shared. The winford is nonkosher. The winford is overnight. The winford deodorise the marris. The winford spondaise the marris. The winford peer the marris. If something deodorise the marris then it is shared. If something is shared and it deodorise the winford then it spondaise the winford. If something spondaise the winford then it is chaldee. If something spondaise the winford and it peer the winford then it is narcotised. If something is shared then it deodorise the winford. If something peer the marris and the marris deodorise the winford then the marris spondaise the winford. If something deodorise the marris then the marris peer the winford. If something is narcotised then it deodorise the winford. The winford does not need the winford.", "logic": "\nChaldee(marris)\nNonkosher(marris)\nNarcotised(marris)\nDeodorise(marris, winford)\nSpondaise(marris, winford)\nPeer(marris, winford)\nShared(winford)\nNonkosher(winford)\nOvernight(winford)\nDeodorise(winford, marris)\nSpondaise(winford, marris)\nPeer(winford, marris)\nforall x (Deodorise(x, marris) -> Shared(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) and Deodorise(x, winford) -> Spondaise(x, winford))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, winford) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, winford) and Peer(x, winford) -> Narcotised(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) -> Deodorise(x, winford))\nforall x (Peer(x, marris) and Deodorise(marris, winford) -> Spondaise(marris, winford))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, marris) -> Peer(marris, winford))\nforall x (Narcotised(x) -> Deodorise(x, winford))\n\nnot Deodorise(winford, winford)\n\nShared(winford) and forall x (Shared(x) -> Deodorise(x, winford)) -> therefore Deodorise(winford, winford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The sarine is aroid. The sarine is enfeebling. The sarine is visionary. The sarine jellify the vivianna. The sarine ingest the vivianna. The sarine avenge the vivianna. The vivianna is immanent. The vivianna is enfeebling. The vivianna is expansive. The vivianna jellify the sarine. The vivianna ingest the sarine. The vivianna avenge the sarine. If something jellify the sarine then it is immanent. If something is immanent and it jellify the vivianna then it ingest the vivianna. If something ingest the vivianna then it is aroid. If something ingest the vivianna and it avenge the vivianna then it is visionary. If something is immanent then it jellify the vivianna. If something avenge the sarine and the sarine jellify the vivianna then the sarine ingest the vivianna. If something jellify the sarine then the sarine avenge the vivianna. If something is visionary then it jellify the vivianna. The vivianna ingest the vivianna.", "logic": "\nAroid(sarine)\nEnfeebling(sarine)\nVisionary(sarine)\nJellify(sarine, vivianna)\nIngest(sarine, vivianna)\nAvenge(sarine, vivianna)\nImmanent(vivianna)\nEnfeebling(vivianna)\nExpansive(vivianna)\nJellify(vivianna, sarine)\nIngest(vivianna, sarine)\nAvenge(vivianna, sarine)\nforall x (Jellify(x, sarine) -> Immanent(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) and Jellify(x, vivianna) -> Ingest(x, vivianna))\nforall x (Ingest(x, vivianna) -> Aroid(x))\nforall x (Ingest(x, vivianna) and Avenge(x, vivianna) -> Visionary(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) -> Jellify(x, vivianna))\nforall x (Avenge(x, sarine) and Jellify(sarine, vivianna) -> Ingest(sarine, vivianna))\nforall x (Jellify(x, sarine) -> Avenge(sarine, vivianna))\nforall x (Visionary(x) -> Jellify(x, vivianna))\n\nIngest(vivianna, vivianna)\n\nImmanent(vivianna) and forall x (Immanent(x) -> Jellify(x, vivianna)) -> therefore Jellify(vivianna, vivianna) Immanent(vivianna) and Jellify(vivianna, vivianna) and forall x (Immanent(x) and Jellify(x, vivianna) -> Ingest(x, vivianna)) -> therefore Ingest(vivianna, vivianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The tedra is floccose. The tedra is funguslike. The tedra is minus. The tedra underlay the melamie. The tedra pretend the melamie. The tedra naturalize the melamie. The melamie is watery. The melamie is funguslike. The melamie is unlucky. The melamie underlay the tedra. The melamie pretend the tedra. The melamie naturalize the tedra. If something underlay the tedra then it is watery. If something is watery and it underlay the melamie then it pretend the melamie. If something pretend the melamie then it is floccose. If something pretend the melamie and it naturalize the melamie then it is minus. If something is watery then it underlay the melamie. If something naturalize the tedra and the tedra underlay the melamie then the tedra pretend the melamie. If something underlay the tedra then the tedra naturalize the melamie. If something is minus then it underlay the melamie. The melamie does not see the melamie.", "logic": "\nFloccose(tedra)\nFunguslike(tedra)\nMinus(tedra)\nUnderlay(tedra, melamie)\nPretend(tedra, melamie)\nNaturalize(tedra, melamie)\nWatery(melamie)\nFunguslike(melamie)\nUnlucky(melamie)\nUnderlay(melamie, tedra)\nPretend(melamie, tedra)\nNaturalize(melamie, tedra)\nforall x (Underlay(x, tedra) -> Watery(x))\nforall x (Watery(x) and Underlay(x, melamie) -> Pretend(x, melamie))\nforall x (Pretend(x, melamie) -> Floccose(x))\nforall x (Pretend(x, melamie) and Naturalize(x, melamie) -> Minus(x))\nforall x (Watery(x) -> Underlay(x, melamie))\nforall x (Naturalize(x, tedra) and Underlay(tedra, melamie) -> Pretend(tedra, melamie))\nforall x (Underlay(x, tedra) -> Naturalize(tedra, melamie))\nforall x (Minus(x) -> Underlay(x, melamie))\n\nnot Pretend(melamie, melamie)\n\nWatery(melamie) and forall x (Watery(x) -> Underlay(x, melamie)) -> therefore Underlay(melamie, melamie) Watery(melamie) and Underlay(melamie, melamie) and forall x (Watery(x) and Underlay(x, melamie) -> Pretend(x, melamie)) -> therefore Pretend(melamie, melamie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The martino is catenulate. The martino is pellucid. The martino is vitiated. The martino dictate the eddie. The martino construct the eddie. The martino billow the eddie. The eddie is semiweekly. The eddie is pellucid. The eddie is tautologic. The eddie dictate the martino. The eddie construct the martino. The eddie billow the martino. If something dictate the martino then it is semiweekly. If something is semiweekly and it dictate the eddie then it construct the eddie. If something construct the eddie then it is catenulate. If something construct the eddie and it billow the eddie then it is vitiated. If something is semiweekly then it dictate the eddie. If something billow the martino and the martino dictate the eddie then the martino construct the eddie. If something dictate the martino then the martino billow the eddie. If something is vitiated then it dictate the eddie. The eddie is catenulate.", "logic": "\nCatenulate(martino)\nPellucid(martino)\nVitiated(martino)\nDictate(martino, eddie)\nConstruct(martino, eddie)\nBillow(martino, eddie)\nSemiweekly(eddie)\nPellucid(eddie)\nTautologic(eddie)\nDictate(eddie, martino)\nConstruct(eddie, martino)\nBillow(eddie, martino)\nforall x (Dictate(x, martino) -> Semiweekly(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) and Dictate(x, eddie) -> Construct(x, eddie))\nforall x (Construct(x, eddie) -> Catenulate(x))\nforall x (Construct(x, eddie) and Billow(x, eddie) -> Vitiated(x))\nforall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Dictate(x, eddie))\nforall x (Billow(x, martino) and Dictate(martino, eddie) -> Construct(martino, eddie))\nforall x (Dictate(x, martino) -> Billow(martino, eddie))\nforall x (Vitiated(x) -> Dictate(x, eddie))\n\nCatenulate(eddie)\n\nSemiweekly(eddie) and forall x (Semiweekly(x) -> Dictate(x, eddie)) -> therefore Dictate(eddie, eddie) Semiweekly(eddie) and Dictate(eddie, eddie) and forall x (Semiweekly(x) and Dictate(x, eddie) -> Construct(x, eddie)) -> therefore Construct(eddie, eddie) Construct(eddie, eddie) and forall x (Construct(x, eddie) -> Catenulate(x)) -> therefore Catenulate(eddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The lucine is scarlet. The lucine is viricidal. The lucine is messianic. The lucine namedrop the novelia. The lucine molest the novelia. The lucine deregulate the novelia. The novelia is middle. The novelia is viricidal. The novelia is comforting. The novelia namedrop the lucine. The novelia molest the lucine. The novelia deregulate the lucine. If something namedrop the lucine then it is middle. If something is middle and it namedrop the novelia then it molest the novelia. If something molest the novelia then it is scarlet. If something molest the novelia and it deregulate the novelia then it is messianic. If something is middle then it namedrop the novelia. If something deregulate the lucine and the lucine namedrop the novelia then the lucine molest the novelia. If something namedrop the lucine then the lucine deregulate the novelia. If something is messianic then it namedrop the novelia. The novelia is not scarlet.", "logic": "\nScarlet(lucine)\nViricidal(lucine)\nMessianic(lucine)\nNamedrop(lucine, novelia)\nMolest(lucine, novelia)\nDeregulate(lucine, novelia)\nMiddle(novelia)\nViricidal(novelia)\nComforting(novelia)\nNamedrop(novelia, lucine)\nMolest(novelia, lucine)\nDeregulate(novelia, lucine)\nforall x (Namedrop(x, lucine) -> Middle(x))\nforall x (Middle(x) and Namedrop(x, novelia) -> Molest(x, novelia))\nforall x (Molest(x, novelia) -> Scarlet(x))\nforall x (Molest(x, novelia) and Deregulate(x, novelia) -> Messianic(x))\nforall x (Middle(x) -> Namedrop(x, novelia))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, lucine) and Namedrop(lucine, novelia) -> Molest(lucine, novelia))\nforall x (Namedrop(x, lucine) -> Deregulate(lucine, novelia))\nforall x (Messianic(x) -> Namedrop(x, novelia))\n\nnot Scarlet(novelia)\n\nMiddle(novelia) and forall x (Middle(x) -> Namedrop(x, novelia)) -> therefore Namedrop(novelia, novelia) Middle(novelia) and Namedrop(novelia, novelia) and forall x (Middle(x) and Namedrop(x, novelia) -> Molest(x, novelia)) -> therefore Molest(novelia, novelia) Molest(novelia, novelia) and forall x (Molest(x, novelia) -> Scarlet(x)) -> therefore Scarlet(novelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The cortese is wintery. The cortese is pretended. The cortese is devouring. The cortese ancylose the godfrey. The cortese rehouse the godfrey. The cortese pickle the godfrey. The godfrey is soapy. The godfrey is pretended. The godfrey is unfinished. The godfrey ancylose the cortese. The godfrey rehouse the cortese. The godfrey pickle the cortese. If something ancylose the cortese then it is soapy. If something is soapy and it ancylose the godfrey then it rehouse the godfrey. If something rehouse the godfrey then it is wintery. If something rehouse the godfrey and it pickle the godfrey then it is devouring. If something is soapy then it ancylose the godfrey. If something pickle the cortese and the cortese ancylose the godfrey then the cortese rehouse the godfrey. If something ancylose the cortese then the cortese pickle the godfrey. If something is devouring then it ancylose the godfrey. The cortese is not soapy.", "logic": "\nWintery(cortese)\nPretended(cortese)\nDevouring(cortese)\nAncylose(cortese, godfrey)\nRehouse(cortese, godfrey)\nPickle(cortese, godfrey)\nSoapy(godfrey)\nPretended(godfrey)\nUnfinished(godfrey)\nAncylose(godfrey, cortese)\nRehouse(godfrey, cortese)\nPickle(godfrey, cortese)\nforall x (Ancylose(x, cortese) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) and Ancylose(x, godfrey) -> Rehouse(x, godfrey))\nforall x (Rehouse(x, godfrey) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Rehouse(x, godfrey) and Pickle(x, godfrey) -> Devouring(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) -> Ancylose(x, godfrey))\nforall x (Pickle(x, cortese) and Ancylose(cortese, godfrey) -> Rehouse(cortese, godfrey))\nforall x (Ancylose(x, cortese) -> Pickle(cortese, godfrey))\nforall x (Devouring(x) -> Ancylose(x, godfrey))\n\nnot Soapy(cortese)\n\nforall x (Ancylose(x, cortese) -> Soapy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The paton is slowgoing. The paton is presto. The paton is cattish. The paton overdrive the lois. The paton assess the lois. The paton hiss the lois. The lois is grievous. The lois is presto. The lois is aspiring. The lois overdrive the paton. The lois assess the paton. The lois hiss the paton. If something overdrive the paton then it is grievous. If something is grievous and it overdrive the lois then it assess the lois. If something assess the lois then it is slowgoing. If something assess the lois and it hiss the lois then it is cattish. If something is grievous then it overdrive the lois. If something hiss the paton and the paton overdrive the lois then the paton assess the lois. If something overdrive the paton then the paton hiss the lois. If something is cattish then it overdrive the lois. The lois is cattish.", "logic": "\nSlowgoing(paton)\nPresto(paton)\nCattish(paton)\nOverdrive(paton, lois)\nAssess(paton, lois)\nHiss(paton, lois)\nGrievous(lois)\nPresto(lois)\nAspiring(lois)\nOverdrive(lois, paton)\nAssess(lois, paton)\nHiss(lois, paton)\nforall x (Overdrive(x, paton) -> Grievous(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Overdrive(x, lois) -> Assess(x, lois))\nforall x (Assess(x, lois) -> Slowgoing(x))\nforall x (Assess(x, lois) and Hiss(x, lois) -> Cattish(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) -> Overdrive(x, lois))\nforall x (Hiss(x, paton) and Overdrive(paton, lois) -> Assess(paton, lois))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, paton) -> Hiss(paton, lois))\nforall x (Cattish(x) -> Overdrive(x, lois))\n\nCattish(lois)\n\nforall x (Assess(x, lois) and Hiss(x, lois) -> Cattish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The mick is paediatric. The mick is resonating. The mick is enmeshed. The mick deaden the penni. The mick slag the penni. The mick flay the penni. The penni is competent. The penni is resonating. The penni is sunburnt. The penni deaden the mick. The penni slag the mick. The penni flay the mick. If something deaden the mick then it is competent. If something is competent and it deaden the penni then it slag the penni. If something slag the penni then it is paediatric. If something slag the penni and it flay the penni then it is enmeshed. If something is competent then it deaden the penni. If something flay the mick and the mick deaden the penni then the mick slag the penni. If something deaden the mick then the mick flay the penni. If something is enmeshed then it deaden the penni. The mick is not sunburnt.", "logic": "\nPaediatric(mick)\nResonating(mick)\nEnmeshed(mick)\nDeaden(mick, penni)\nSlag(mick, penni)\nFlay(mick, penni)\nCompetent(penni)\nResonating(penni)\nSunburnt(penni)\nDeaden(penni, mick)\nSlag(penni, mick)\nFlay(penni, mick)\nforall x (Deaden(x, mick) -> Competent(x))\nforall x (Competent(x) and Deaden(x, penni) -> Slag(x, penni))\nforall x (Slag(x, penni) -> Paediatric(x))\nforall x (Slag(x, penni) and Flay(x, penni) -> Enmeshed(x))\nforall x (Competent(x) -> Deaden(x, penni))\nforall x (Flay(x, mick) and Deaden(mick, penni) -> Slag(mick, penni))\nforall x (Deaden(x, mick) -> Flay(mick, penni))\nforall x (Enmeshed(x) -> Deaden(x, penni))\n\nnot Sunburnt(mick)\n\nnot Sunburnt(mick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The marnia is some. The marnia is bracted. The marnia is glittering. The marnia fetter the olga. The marnia crack the olga. The marnia bequeath the olga. The olga is aplitic. The olga is bracted. The olga is afeard. The olga fetter the marnia. The olga crack the marnia. The olga bequeath the marnia. If something fetter the marnia then it is aplitic. If something is aplitic and it fetter the olga then it crack the olga. If something crack the olga then it is some. If something crack the olga and it bequeath the olga then it is glittering. If something is aplitic then it fetter the olga. If something bequeath the marnia and the marnia fetter the olga then the marnia crack the olga. If something fetter the marnia then the marnia bequeath the olga. If something is glittering then it fetter the olga. The marnia bequeath the marnia.", "logic": "\nSome(marnia)\nBracted(marnia)\nGlittering(marnia)\nFetter(marnia, olga)\nCrack(marnia, olga)\nBequeath(marnia, olga)\nAplitic(olga)\nBracted(olga)\nAfeard(olga)\nFetter(olga, marnia)\nCrack(olga, marnia)\nBequeath(olga, marnia)\nforall x (Fetter(x, marnia) -> Aplitic(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) and Fetter(x, olga) -> Crack(x, olga))\nforall x (Crack(x, olga) -> Some(x))\nforall x (Crack(x, olga) and Bequeath(x, olga) -> Glittering(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) -> Fetter(x, olga))\nforall x (Bequeath(x, marnia) and Fetter(marnia, olga) -> Crack(marnia, olga))\nforall x (Fetter(x, marnia) -> Bequeath(marnia, olga))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> Fetter(x, olga))\n\nBequeath(marnia, marnia)\n\nBequeath(marnia, marnia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The regan is synchronal. The regan is shockable. The regan is dianoetic. The regan emulate the dahlia. The regan decolonize the dahlia. The regan holiday the dahlia. The dahlia is civilian. The dahlia is shockable. The dahlia is convolute. The dahlia emulate the regan. The dahlia decolonize the regan. The dahlia holiday the regan. If something emulate the regan then it is civilian. If something is civilian and it emulate the dahlia then it decolonize the dahlia. If something decolonize the dahlia then it is synchronal. If something decolonize the dahlia and it holiday the dahlia then it is dianoetic. If something is civilian then it emulate the dahlia. If something holiday the regan and the regan emulate the dahlia then the regan decolonize the dahlia. If something emulate the regan then the regan holiday the dahlia. If something is dianoetic then it emulate the dahlia. The dahlia does not visit the dahlia.", "logic": "\nSynchronal(regan)\nShockable(regan)\nDianoetic(regan)\nEmulate(regan, dahlia)\nDecolonize(regan, dahlia)\nHoliday(regan, dahlia)\nCivilian(dahlia)\nShockable(dahlia)\nConvolute(dahlia)\nEmulate(dahlia, regan)\nDecolonize(dahlia, regan)\nHoliday(dahlia, regan)\nforall x (Emulate(x, regan) -> Civilian(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) and Emulate(x, dahlia) -> Decolonize(x, dahlia))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, dahlia) -> Synchronal(x))\nforall x (Decolonize(x, dahlia) and Holiday(x, dahlia) -> Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Emulate(x, dahlia))\nforall x (Holiday(x, regan) and Emulate(regan, dahlia) -> Decolonize(regan, dahlia))\nforall x (Emulate(x, regan) -> Holiday(regan, dahlia))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) -> Emulate(x, dahlia))\n\nnot Holiday(dahlia, dahlia)\n\nnot Holiday(dahlia, dahlia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The aube is deltoid. The aube is argentous. The aube is corrosive. The aube demote the adora. The aube bitch the adora. The aube classicise the adora. The adora is unraised. The adora is argentous. The adora is yeasty. The adora demote the aube. The adora bitch the aube. The adora classicise the aube. If something demote the aube then it is unraised. If something is unraised and it demote the adora then it bitch the adora. If something bitch the adora then it is deltoid. If something bitch the adora and it classicise the adora then it is corrosive. If something is unraised then it demote the adora. If something classicise the aube and the aube demote the adora then the aube bitch the adora. If something demote the aube then the aube classicise the adora. If something is corrosive then it demote the adora. The aube demote the aube.", "logic": "\nDeltoid(aube)\nArgentous(aube)\nCorrosive(aube)\nDemote(aube, adora)\nBitch(aube, adora)\nClassicise(aube, adora)\nUnraised(adora)\nArgentous(adora)\nYeasty(adora)\nDemote(adora, aube)\nBitch(adora, aube)\nClassicise(adora, aube)\nforall x (Demote(x, aube) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) and Demote(x, adora) -> Bitch(x, adora))\nforall x (Bitch(x, adora) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Bitch(x, adora) and Classicise(x, adora) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> Demote(x, adora))\nforall x (Classicise(x, aube) and Demote(aube, adora) -> Bitch(aube, adora))\nforall x (Demote(x, aube) -> Classicise(aube, adora))\nforall x (Corrosive(x) -> Demote(x, adora))\n\nDemote(aube, aube)\n\nDemote(aube, aube) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1543"} {"premises": "The keene ford the marsiella. The keene is fungous. The keene is tusked. The keene quack the marsiella. The keene quack the joanie. The keene allude the marsiella. The keene allude the joanie. The marsiella is fungous. The marsiella allude the keene. The joanie ford the keene. If someone ford the joanie then they see the joanie. If someone quack the keene then the keene is jerkwater. If someone allude the keene and they eat the marsiella then they like the marsiella. If someone ford the keene then they like the keene. If the marsiella ford the keene and the keene quack the marsiella then the marsiella allude the joanie. If someone allude the marsiella then the marsiella quack the keene. If the marsiella allude the keene and the keene ford the marsiella then the keene allude the marsiella. If someone is jerkwater then they eat the joanie. The keene is fungous.", "logic": "\nFord(keene, marsiella)\nFungous(keene)\nTusked(keene)\nQuack(keene, marsiella)\nQuack(keene, joanie)\nAllude(keene, marsiella)\nAllude(keene, joanie)\nFungous(marsiella)\nAllude(marsiella, keene)\nFord(joanie, keene)\nforall x (Ford(x, joanie) -> Allude(x, joanie))\nforall x (Quack(x, keene) -> Jerkwater(keene))\nforall x (Allude(x, keene) and Ford(x, marsiella) -> Quack(x, marsiella))\nforall x (Ford(x, keene) -> Quack(x, keene))\nFord(marsiella, keene) and Quack(keene, marsiella) -> Allude(marsiella, joanie)\nforall x (Allude(x, marsiella) -> Quack(marsiella, keene))\nAllude(marsiella, keene) and Ford(keene, marsiella) -> Allude(keene, marsiella)\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) -> Ford(x, joanie))\n\nFungous(keene)\n\ntherefore Fungous(keene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The carmita advect the gilberto. The carmita is triple. The carmita is subversive. The carmita crystalize the gilberto. The carmita crystalize the everard. The carmita vulcanize the gilberto. The carmita vulcanize the everard. The gilberto is triple. The gilberto vulcanize the carmita. The everard advect the carmita. If someone advect the everard then they see the everard. If someone crystalize the carmita then the carmita is northeast. If someone vulcanize the carmita and they eat the gilberto then they like the gilberto. If someone advect the carmita then they like the carmita. If the gilberto advect the carmita and the carmita crystalize the gilberto then the gilberto vulcanize the everard. If someone vulcanize the gilberto then the gilberto crystalize the carmita. If the gilberto vulcanize the carmita and the carmita advect the gilberto then the carmita vulcanize the gilberto. If someone is northeast then they eat the everard. The carmita does not like the gilberto.", "logic": "\nAdvect(carmita, gilberto)\nTriple(carmita)\nSubversive(carmita)\nCrystalize(carmita, gilberto)\nCrystalize(carmita, everard)\nVulcanize(carmita, gilberto)\nVulcanize(carmita, everard)\nTriple(gilberto)\nVulcanize(gilberto, carmita)\nAdvect(everard, carmita)\nforall x (Advect(x, everard) -> Vulcanize(x, everard))\nforall x (Crystalize(x, carmita) -> Northeast(carmita))\nforall x (Vulcanize(x, carmita) and Advect(x, gilberto) -> Crystalize(x, gilberto))\nforall x (Advect(x, carmita) -> Crystalize(x, carmita))\nAdvect(gilberto, carmita) and Crystalize(carmita, gilberto) -> Vulcanize(gilberto, everard)\nforall x (Vulcanize(x, gilberto) -> Crystalize(gilberto, carmita))\nVulcanize(gilberto, carmita) and Advect(carmita, gilberto) -> Vulcanize(carmita, gilberto)\nforall x (Northeast(x) -> Advect(x, everard))\n\nnot Crystalize(carmita, gilberto)\n\ntherefore Crystalize(carmita, gilberto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The carolie carp the victor. The carolie is aglitter. The carolie is outlying. The carolie transition the victor. The carolie transition the gay. The carolie topdress the victor. The carolie topdress the gay. The victor is aglitter. The victor topdress the carolie. The gay carp the carolie. If someone carp the gay then they see the gay. If someone transition the carolie then the carolie is widowed. If someone topdress the carolie and they eat the victor then they like the victor. If someone carp the carolie then they like the carolie. If the victor carp the carolie and the carolie transition the victor then the victor topdress the gay. If someone topdress the victor then the victor transition the carolie. If the victor topdress the carolie and the carolie carp the victor then the carolie topdress the victor. If someone is widowed then they eat the gay. The victor transition the carolie.", "logic": "\nCarp(carolie, victor)\nAglitter(carolie)\nOutlying(carolie)\nTransition(carolie, victor)\nTransition(carolie, gay)\nTopdress(carolie, victor)\nTopdress(carolie, gay)\nAglitter(victor)\nTopdress(victor, carolie)\nCarp(gay, carolie)\nforall x (Carp(x, gay) -> Topdress(x, gay))\nforall x (Transition(x, carolie) -> Widowed(carolie))\nforall x (Topdress(x, carolie) and Carp(x, victor) -> Transition(x, victor))\nforall x (Carp(x, carolie) -> Transition(x, carolie))\nCarp(victor, carolie) and Transition(carolie, victor) -> Topdress(victor, gay)\nforall x (Topdress(x, victor) -> Transition(victor, carolie))\nTopdress(victor, carolie) and Carp(carolie, victor) -> Topdress(carolie, victor)\nforall x (Widowed(x) -> Carp(x, gay))\n\nTransition(victor, carolie)\n\nTopdress(carolie, victor) and forall x (Topdress(x, victor) -> Transition(victor, carolie)) -> therefore Transition(victor, carolie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The corina honk the heda. The corina is birchen. The corina is heralded. The corina overstock the heda. The corina overstock the socrates. The corina inhere the heda. The corina inhere the socrates. The heda is birchen. The heda inhere the corina. The socrates honk the corina. If someone honk the socrates then they see the socrates. If someone overstock the corina then the corina is amateur. If someone inhere the corina and they eat the heda then they like the heda. If someone honk the corina then they like the corina. If the heda honk the corina and the corina overstock the heda then the heda inhere the socrates. If someone inhere the heda then the heda overstock the corina. If the heda inhere the corina and the corina honk the heda then the corina inhere the heda. If someone is amateur then they eat the socrates. The heda does not like the corina.", "logic": "\nHonk(corina, heda)\nBirchen(corina)\nHeralded(corina)\nOverstock(corina, heda)\nOverstock(corina, socrates)\nInhere(corina, heda)\nInhere(corina, socrates)\nBirchen(heda)\nInhere(heda, corina)\nHonk(socrates, corina)\nforall x (Honk(x, socrates) -> Inhere(x, socrates))\nforall x (Overstock(x, corina) -> Amateur(corina))\nforall x (Inhere(x, corina) and Honk(x, heda) -> Overstock(x, heda))\nforall x (Honk(x, corina) -> Overstock(x, corina))\nHonk(heda, corina) and Overstock(corina, heda) -> Inhere(heda, socrates)\nforall x (Inhere(x, heda) -> Overstock(heda, corina))\nInhere(heda, corina) and Honk(corina, heda) -> Inhere(corina, heda)\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> Honk(x, socrates))\n\nnot Overstock(heda, corina)\n\nInhere(corina, heda) and forall x (Inhere(x, heda) -> Overstock(heda, corina)) -> therefore Overstock(heda, corina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The clancy blunder the jewelle. The clancy is biyearly. The clancy is dyspnoeal. The clancy cite the jewelle. The clancy cite the jayme. The clancy vowelise the jewelle. The clancy vowelise the jayme. The jewelle is biyearly. The jewelle vowelise the clancy. The jayme blunder the clancy. If someone blunder the jayme then they see the jayme. If someone cite the clancy then the clancy is unmarked. If someone vowelise the clancy and they eat the jewelle then they like the jewelle. If someone blunder the clancy then they like the clancy. If the jewelle blunder the clancy and the clancy cite the jewelle then the jewelle vowelise the jayme. If someone vowelise the jewelle then the jewelle cite the clancy. If the jewelle vowelise the clancy and the clancy blunder the jewelle then the clancy vowelise the jewelle. If someone is unmarked then they eat the jayme. The clancy is unmarked.", "logic": "\nBlunder(clancy, jewelle)\nBiyearly(clancy)\nDyspnoeal(clancy)\nCite(clancy, jewelle)\nCite(clancy, jayme)\nVowelise(clancy, jewelle)\nVowelise(clancy, jayme)\nBiyearly(jewelle)\nVowelise(jewelle, clancy)\nBlunder(jayme, clancy)\nforall x (Blunder(x, jayme) -> Vowelise(x, jayme))\nforall x (Cite(x, clancy) -> Unmarked(clancy))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, clancy) and Blunder(x, jewelle) -> Cite(x, jewelle))\nforall x (Blunder(x, clancy) -> Cite(x, clancy))\nBlunder(jewelle, clancy) and Cite(clancy, jewelle) -> Vowelise(jewelle, jayme)\nforall x (Vowelise(x, jewelle) -> Cite(jewelle, clancy))\nVowelise(jewelle, clancy) and Blunder(clancy, jewelle) -> Vowelise(clancy, jewelle)\nforall x (Unmarked(x) -> Blunder(x, jayme))\n\nUnmarked(clancy)\n\nBlunder(jayme, clancy) and forall x (Blunder(x, clancy) -> Cite(x, clancy)) -> therefore Cite(jayme, clancy) Cite(jayme, clancy) and forall x (Cite(x, clancy) -> Unmarked(clancy)) -> therefore Unmarked(clancy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The arne doze the lyndell. The arne is dialectal. The arne is gawky. The arne fish the lyndell. The arne fish the mab. The arne reunite the lyndell. The arne reunite the mab. The lyndell is dialectal. The lyndell reunite the arne. The mab doze the arne. If someone doze the mab then they see the mab. If someone fish the arne then the arne is unicuspid. If someone reunite the arne and they eat the lyndell then they like the lyndell. If someone doze the arne then they like the arne. If the lyndell doze the arne and the arne fish the lyndell then the lyndell reunite the mab. If someone reunite the lyndell then the lyndell fish the arne. If the lyndell reunite the arne and the arne doze the lyndell then the arne reunite the lyndell. If someone is unicuspid then they eat the mab. The arne is not unicuspid.", "logic": "\nDoze(arne, lyndell)\nDialectal(arne)\nGawky(arne)\nFish(arne, lyndell)\nFish(arne, mab)\nReunite(arne, lyndell)\nReunite(arne, mab)\nDialectal(lyndell)\nReunite(lyndell, arne)\nDoze(mab, arne)\nforall x (Doze(x, mab) -> Reunite(x, mab))\nforall x (Fish(x, arne) -> Unicuspid(arne))\nforall x (Reunite(x, arne) and Doze(x, lyndell) -> Fish(x, lyndell))\nforall x (Doze(x, arne) -> Fish(x, arne))\nDoze(lyndell, arne) and Fish(arne, lyndell) -> Reunite(lyndell, mab)\nforall x (Reunite(x, lyndell) -> Fish(lyndell, arne))\nReunite(lyndell, arne) and Doze(arne, lyndell) -> Reunite(arne, lyndell)\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Doze(x, mab))\n\nnot Unicuspid(arne)\n\nDoze(mab, arne) and forall x (Doze(x, arne) -> Fish(x, arne)) -> therefore Fish(mab, arne) Fish(mab, arne) and forall x (Fish(x, arne) -> Unicuspid(arne)) -> therefore Unicuspid(arne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The quincy strew the rolland. The quincy is applied. The quincy is empirical. The quincy revitalise the rolland. The quincy revitalise the ernie. The quincy heist the rolland. The quincy heist the ernie. The rolland is applied. The rolland heist the quincy. The ernie strew the quincy. If someone strew the ernie then they see the ernie. If someone revitalise the quincy then the quincy is nonviscid. If someone heist the quincy and they eat the rolland then they like the rolland. If someone strew the quincy then they like the quincy. If the rolland strew the quincy and the quincy revitalise the rolland then the rolland heist the ernie. If someone heist the rolland then the rolland revitalise the quincy. If the rolland heist the quincy and the quincy strew the rolland then the quincy heist the rolland. If someone is nonviscid then they eat the ernie. The quincy strew the ernie.", "logic": "\nStrew(quincy, rolland)\nApplied(quincy)\nEmpirical(quincy)\nRevitalise(quincy, rolland)\nRevitalise(quincy, ernie)\nHeist(quincy, rolland)\nHeist(quincy, ernie)\nApplied(rolland)\nHeist(rolland, quincy)\nStrew(ernie, quincy)\nforall x (Strew(x, ernie) -> Heist(x, ernie))\nforall x (Revitalise(x, quincy) -> Nonviscid(quincy))\nforall x (Heist(x, quincy) and Strew(x, rolland) -> Revitalise(x, rolland))\nforall x (Strew(x, quincy) -> Revitalise(x, quincy))\nStrew(rolland, quincy) and Revitalise(quincy, rolland) -> Heist(rolland, ernie)\nforall x (Heist(x, rolland) -> Revitalise(rolland, quincy))\nHeist(rolland, quincy) and Strew(quincy, rolland) -> Heist(quincy, rolland)\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) -> Strew(x, ernie))\n\nStrew(quincy, ernie)\n\nStrew(ernie, quincy) and forall x (Strew(x, quincy) -> Revitalise(x, quincy)) -> therefore Revitalise(ernie, quincy) Revitalise(ernie, quincy) and forall x (Revitalise(x, quincy) -> Nonviscid(quincy)) -> therefore Nonviscid(quincy) Nonviscid(quincy) and forall x (Nonviscid(x) -> Strew(x, ernie)) -> therefore Strew(quincy, ernie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The netti purple the gerry. The netti is fixed. The netti is attrited. The netti finalise the gerry. The netti finalise the marcellus. The netti meter the gerry. The netti meter the marcellus. The gerry is fixed. The gerry meter the netti. The marcellus purple the netti. If someone purple the marcellus then they see the marcellus. If someone finalise the netti then the netti is ninetieth. If someone meter the netti and they eat the gerry then they like the gerry. If someone purple the netti then they like the netti. If the gerry purple the netti and the netti finalise the gerry then the gerry meter the marcellus. If someone meter the gerry then the gerry finalise the netti. If the gerry meter the netti and the netti purple the gerry then the netti meter the gerry. If someone is ninetieth then they eat the marcellus. The netti does not eat the marcellus.", "logic": "\nPurple(netti, gerry)\nFixed(netti)\nAttrited(netti)\nFinalise(netti, gerry)\nFinalise(netti, marcellus)\nMeter(netti, gerry)\nMeter(netti, marcellus)\nFixed(gerry)\nMeter(gerry, netti)\nPurple(marcellus, netti)\nforall x (Purple(x, marcellus) -> Meter(x, marcellus))\nforall x (Finalise(x, netti) -> Ninetieth(netti))\nforall x (Meter(x, netti) and Purple(x, gerry) -> Finalise(x, gerry))\nforall x (Purple(x, netti) -> Finalise(x, netti))\nPurple(gerry, netti) and Finalise(netti, gerry) -> Meter(gerry, marcellus)\nforall x (Meter(x, gerry) -> Finalise(gerry, netti))\nMeter(gerry, netti) and Purple(netti, gerry) -> Meter(netti, gerry)\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) -> Purple(x, marcellus))\n\nnot Purple(netti, marcellus)\n\nPurple(marcellus, netti) and forall x (Purple(x, netti) -> Finalise(x, netti)) -> therefore Finalise(marcellus, netti) Finalise(marcellus, netti) and forall x (Finalise(x, netti) -> Ninetieth(netti)) -> therefore Ninetieth(netti) Ninetieth(netti) and forall x (Ninetieth(x) -> Purple(x, marcellus)) -> therefore Purple(netti, marcellus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The christi dateline the bernie. The christi is idealistic. The christi is schematic. The christi alight the bernie. The christi alight the jacquie. The christi amputate the bernie. The christi amputate the jacquie. The bernie is idealistic. The bernie amputate the christi. The jacquie dateline the christi. If someone dateline the jacquie then they see the jacquie. If someone alight the christi then the christi is pastel. If someone amputate the christi and they eat the bernie then they like the bernie. If someone dateline the christi then they like the christi. If the bernie dateline the christi and the christi alight the bernie then the bernie amputate the jacquie. If someone amputate the bernie then the bernie alight the christi. If the bernie amputate the christi and the christi dateline the bernie then the christi amputate the bernie. If someone is pastel then they eat the jacquie. The bernie does not see the jacquie.", "logic": "\nDateline(christi, bernie)\nIdealistic(christi)\nSchematic(christi)\nAlight(christi, bernie)\nAlight(christi, jacquie)\nAmputate(christi, bernie)\nAmputate(christi, jacquie)\nIdealistic(bernie)\nAmputate(bernie, christi)\nDateline(jacquie, christi)\nforall x (Dateline(x, jacquie) -> Amputate(x, jacquie))\nforall x (Alight(x, christi) -> Pastel(christi))\nforall x (Amputate(x, christi) and Dateline(x, bernie) -> Alight(x, bernie))\nforall x (Dateline(x, christi) -> Alight(x, christi))\nDateline(bernie, christi) and Alight(christi, bernie) -> Amputate(bernie, jacquie)\nforall x (Amputate(x, bernie) -> Alight(bernie, christi))\nAmputate(bernie, christi) and Dateline(christi, bernie) -> Amputate(christi, bernie)\nforall x (Pastel(x) -> Dateline(x, jacquie))\n\nnot Amputate(bernie, jacquie)\n\nforall x (Dateline(x, jacquie) -> Amputate(x, jacquie)) <- forall x (Pastel(x) -> Dateline(x, jacquie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The benjamin snooze the serena. The benjamin is confluent. The benjamin is overawed. The benjamin poise the serena. The benjamin poise the marlowe. The benjamin shuck the serena. The benjamin shuck the marlowe. The serena is confluent. The serena shuck the benjamin. The marlowe snooze the benjamin. If someone snooze the marlowe then they see the marlowe. If someone poise the benjamin then the benjamin is headless. If someone shuck the benjamin and they eat the serena then they like the serena. If someone snooze the benjamin then they like the benjamin. If the serena snooze the benjamin and the benjamin poise the serena then the serena shuck the marlowe. If someone shuck the serena then the serena poise the benjamin. If the serena shuck the benjamin and the benjamin snooze the serena then the benjamin shuck the serena. If someone is headless then they eat the marlowe. The benjamin poise the benjamin.", "logic": "\nSnooze(benjamin, serena)\nConfluent(benjamin)\nOverawed(benjamin)\nPoise(benjamin, serena)\nPoise(benjamin, marlowe)\nShuck(benjamin, serena)\nShuck(benjamin, marlowe)\nConfluent(serena)\nShuck(serena, benjamin)\nSnooze(marlowe, benjamin)\nforall x (Snooze(x, marlowe) -> Shuck(x, marlowe))\nforall x (Poise(x, benjamin) -> Headless(benjamin))\nforall x (Shuck(x, benjamin) and Snooze(x, serena) -> Poise(x, serena))\nforall x (Snooze(x, benjamin) -> Poise(x, benjamin))\nSnooze(serena, benjamin) and Poise(benjamin, serena) -> Shuck(serena, marlowe)\nforall x (Shuck(x, serena) -> Poise(serena, benjamin))\nShuck(serena, benjamin) and Snooze(benjamin, serena) -> Shuck(benjamin, serena)\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Snooze(x, marlowe))\n\nPoise(benjamin, benjamin)\n\nforall x (Snooze(x, benjamin) -> Poise(x, benjamin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The paddie suit the eldon. The paddie is linguistic. The paddie is sebaceous. The paddie rebury the eldon. The paddie rebury the maressa. The paddie sleep the eldon. The paddie sleep the maressa. The eldon is linguistic. The eldon sleep the paddie. The maressa suit the paddie. If someone suit the maressa then they see the maressa. If someone rebury the paddie then the paddie is cxxv. If someone sleep the paddie and they eat the eldon then they like the eldon. If someone suit the paddie then they like the paddie. If the eldon suit the paddie and the paddie rebury the eldon then the eldon sleep the maressa. If someone sleep the eldon then the eldon rebury the paddie. If the eldon sleep the paddie and the paddie suit the eldon then the paddie sleep the eldon. If someone is cxxv then they eat the maressa. The maressa does not eat the maressa.", "logic": "\nSuit(paddie, eldon)\nLinguistic(paddie)\nSebaceous(paddie)\nRebury(paddie, eldon)\nRebury(paddie, maressa)\nSleep(paddie, eldon)\nSleep(paddie, maressa)\nLinguistic(eldon)\nSleep(eldon, paddie)\nSuit(maressa, paddie)\nforall x (Suit(x, maressa) -> Sleep(x, maressa))\nforall x (Rebury(x, paddie) -> Cxxv(paddie))\nforall x (Sleep(x, paddie) and Suit(x, eldon) -> Rebury(x, eldon))\nforall x (Suit(x, paddie) -> Rebury(x, paddie))\nSuit(eldon, paddie) and Rebury(paddie, eldon) -> Sleep(eldon, maressa)\nforall x (Sleep(x, eldon) -> Rebury(eldon, paddie))\nSleep(eldon, paddie) and Suit(paddie, eldon) -> Sleep(paddie, eldon)\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Suit(x, maressa))\n\nnot Suit(maressa, maressa)\n\nforall x (Cxxv(x) -> Suit(x, maressa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The kyle sensify the gabriele. The kyle is unarmed. The kyle is elective. The kyle cohere the gabriele. The kyle cohere the wenda. The kyle handstamp the gabriele. The kyle handstamp the wenda. The gabriele is unarmed. The gabriele handstamp the kyle. The wenda sensify the kyle. If someone sensify the wenda then they see the wenda. If someone cohere the kyle then the kyle is anesthetic. If someone handstamp the kyle and they eat the gabriele then they like the gabriele. If someone sensify the kyle then they like the kyle. If the gabriele sensify the kyle and the kyle cohere the gabriele then the gabriele handstamp the wenda. If someone handstamp the gabriele then the gabriele cohere the kyle. If the gabriele handstamp the kyle and the kyle sensify the gabriele then the kyle handstamp the gabriele. If someone is anesthetic then they eat the wenda. The gabriele cohere the gabriele.", "logic": "\nSensify(kyle, gabriele)\nUnarmed(kyle)\nElective(kyle)\nCohere(kyle, gabriele)\nCohere(kyle, wenda)\nHandstamp(kyle, gabriele)\nHandstamp(kyle, wenda)\nUnarmed(gabriele)\nHandstamp(gabriele, kyle)\nSensify(wenda, kyle)\nforall x (Sensify(x, wenda) -> Handstamp(x, wenda))\nforall x (Cohere(x, kyle) -> Anesthetic(kyle))\nforall x (Handstamp(x, kyle) and Sensify(x, gabriele) -> Cohere(x, gabriele))\nforall x (Sensify(x, kyle) -> Cohere(x, kyle))\nSensify(gabriele, kyle) and Cohere(kyle, gabriele) -> Handstamp(gabriele, wenda)\nforall x (Handstamp(x, gabriele) -> Cohere(gabriele, kyle))\nHandstamp(gabriele, kyle) and Sensify(kyle, gabriele) -> Handstamp(kyle, gabriele)\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Sensify(x, wenda))\n\nCohere(gabriele, gabriele)\n\nforall x (Handstamp(x, kyle) and Sensify(x, gabriele) -> Cohere(x, gabriele)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The elmira calm the dayna. The elmira is scentless. The elmira is receptive. The elmira retain the dayna. The elmira retain the corissa. The elmira piffle the dayna. The elmira piffle the corissa. The dayna is scentless. The dayna piffle the elmira. The corissa calm the elmira. If someone calm the corissa then they see the corissa. If someone retain the elmira then the elmira is invariable. If someone piffle the elmira and they eat the dayna then they like the dayna. If someone calm the elmira then they like the elmira. If the dayna calm the elmira and the elmira retain the dayna then the dayna piffle the corissa. If someone piffle the dayna then the dayna retain the elmira. If the dayna piffle the elmira and the elmira calm the dayna then the elmira piffle the dayna. If someone is invariable then they eat the corissa. The corissa is not nice.", "logic": "\nCalm(elmira, dayna)\nScentless(elmira)\nReceptive(elmira)\nRetain(elmira, dayna)\nRetain(elmira, corissa)\nPiffle(elmira, dayna)\nPiffle(elmira, corissa)\nScentless(dayna)\nPiffle(dayna, elmira)\nCalm(corissa, elmira)\nforall x (Calm(x, corissa) -> Piffle(x, corissa))\nforall x (Retain(x, elmira) -> Invariable(elmira))\nforall x (Piffle(x, elmira) and Calm(x, dayna) -> Retain(x, dayna))\nforall x (Calm(x, elmira) -> Retain(x, elmira))\nCalm(dayna, elmira) and Retain(elmira, dayna) -> Piffle(dayna, corissa)\nforall x (Piffle(x, dayna) -> Retain(dayna, elmira))\nPiffle(dayna, elmira) and Calm(elmira, dayna) -> Piffle(elmira, dayna)\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Calm(x, corissa))\n\nnot Nice(corissa)\n\nnot Nice(corissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The calhoun bust the mattheus. The calhoun is harmonical. The calhoun is busybodied. The calhoun metal the mattheus. The calhoun metal the kellie. The calhoun stanch the mattheus. The calhoun stanch the kellie. The mattheus is harmonical. The mattheus stanch the calhoun. The kellie bust the calhoun. If someone bust the kellie then they see the kellie. If someone metal the calhoun then the calhoun is causeless. If someone stanch the calhoun and they eat the mattheus then they like the mattheus. If someone bust the calhoun then they like the calhoun. If the mattheus bust the calhoun and the calhoun metal the mattheus then the mattheus stanch the kellie. If someone stanch the mattheus then the mattheus metal the calhoun. If the mattheus stanch the calhoun and the calhoun bust the mattheus then the calhoun stanch the mattheus. If someone is causeless then they eat the kellie. The calhoun is nice.", "logic": "\nBust(calhoun, mattheus)\nHarmonical(calhoun)\nBusybodied(calhoun)\nMetal(calhoun, mattheus)\nMetal(calhoun, kellie)\nStanch(calhoun, mattheus)\nStanch(calhoun, kellie)\nHarmonical(mattheus)\nStanch(mattheus, calhoun)\nBust(kellie, calhoun)\nforall x (Bust(x, kellie) -> Stanch(x, kellie))\nforall x (Metal(x, calhoun) -> Causeless(calhoun))\nforall x (Stanch(x, calhoun) and Bust(x, mattheus) -> Metal(x, mattheus))\nforall x (Bust(x, calhoun) -> Metal(x, calhoun))\nBust(mattheus, calhoun) and Metal(calhoun, mattheus) -> Stanch(mattheus, kellie)\nforall x (Stanch(x, mattheus) -> Metal(mattheus, calhoun))\nStanch(mattheus, calhoun) and Bust(calhoun, mattheus) -> Stanch(calhoun, mattheus)\nforall x (Causeless(x) -> Bust(x, kellie))\n\nNice(calhoun)\n\nNice(calhoun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The debra defecate the celinka. The debra is bragging. The debra is ablated. The debra depreciate the celinka. The debra depreciate the crawford. The debra amount the celinka. The debra amount the crawford. The celinka is bragging. The celinka amount the debra. The crawford defecate the debra. If someone defecate the crawford then they see the crawford. If someone depreciate the debra then the debra is livid. If someone amount the debra and they eat the celinka then they like the celinka. If someone defecate the debra then they like the debra. If the celinka defecate the debra and the debra depreciate the celinka then the celinka amount the crawford. If someone amount the celinka then the celinka depreciate the debra. If the celinka amount the debra and the debra defecate the celinka then the debra amount the celinka. If someone is livid then they eat the crawford. The crawford does not like the crawford.", "logic": "\nDefecate(debra, celinka)\nBragging(debra)\nAblated(debra)\nDepreciate(debra, celinka)\nDepreciate(debra, crawford)\nAmount(debra, celinka)\nAmount(debra, crawford)\nBragging(celinka)\nAmount(celinka, debra)\nDefecate(crawford, debra)\nforall x (Defecate(x, crawford) -> Amount(x, crawford))\nforall x (Depreciate(x, debra) -> Livid(debra))\nforall x (Amount(x, debra) and Defecate(x, celinka) -> Depreciate(x, celinka))\nforall x (Defecate(x, debra) -> Depreciate(x, debra))\nDefecate(celinka, debra) and Depreciate(debra, celinka) -> Amount(celinka, crawford)\nforall x (Amount(x, celinka) -> Depreciate(celinka, debra))\nAmount(celinka, debra) and Defecate(debra, celinka) -> Amount(debra, celinka)\nforall x (Livid(x) -> Defecate(x, crawford))\n\nnot Depreciate(crawford, crawford)\n\nnot Depreciate(crawford, crawford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The lucine neuter the kyrstin. The lucine is chivalric. The lucine is bacterioid. The lucine sham the kyrstin. The lucine sham the tansy. The lucine whisker the kyrstin. The lucine whisker the tansy. The kyrstin is chivalric. The kyrstin whisker the lucine. The tansy neuter the lucine. If someone neuter the tansy then they see the tansy. If someone sham the lucine then the lucine is tactless. If someone whisker the lucine and they eat the kyrstin then they like the kyrstin. If someone neuter the lucine then they like the lucine. If the kyrstin neuter the lucine and the lucine sham the kyrstin then the kyrstin whisker the tansy. If someone whisker the kyrstin then the kyrstin sham the lucine. If the kyrstin whisker the lucine and the lucine neuter the kyrstin then the lucine whisker the kyrstin. If someone is tactless then they eat the tansy. The kyrstin is tactless.", "logic": "\nNeuter(lucine, kyrstin)\nChivalric(lucine)\nBacterioid(lucine)\nSham(lucine, kyrstin)\nSham(lucine, tansy)\nWhisker(lucine, kyrstin)\nWhisker(lucine, tansy)\nChivalric(kyrstin)\nWhisker(kyrstin, lucine)\nNeuter(tansy, lucine)\nforall x (Neuter(x, tansy) -> Whisker(x, tansy))\nforall x (Sham(x, lucine) -> Tactless(lucine))\nforall x (Whisker(x, lucine) and Neuter(x, kyrstin) -> Sham(x, kyrstin))\nforall x (Neuter(x, lucine) -> Sham(x, lucine))\nNeuter(kyrstin, lucine) and Sham(lucine, kyrstin) -> Whisker(kyrstin, tansy)\nforall x (Whisker(x, kyrstin) -> Sham(kyrstin, lucine))\nWhisker(kyrstin, lucine) and Neuter(lucine, kyrstin) -> Whisker(lucine, kyrstin)\nforall x (Tactless(x) -> Neuter(x, tansy))\n\nTactless(kyrstin)\n\nTactless(kyrstin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-921"} {"premises": "The kimberley is home. The flossie deionize the kimberley. If something flower the kimberley then it is doltish. If the kimberley flower the flossie and the kimberley is emasculate then the flossie equivocate the kimberley. If something equivocate the flossie and it is disturbed then the flossie flower the kimberley. If something flower the flossie then it deionize the kimberley. If the flossie deionize the kimberley then the kimberley equivocate the flossie. If something flower the flossie and the flossie deionize the kimberley then the flossie is disturbed. If the flossie is home and the flossie is emasculate then the flossie flower the kimberley. If the kimberley equivocate the flossie then the kimberley flower the flossie. The flossie deionize the kimberley.", "logic": "\nHome(kimberley)\nDeionize(flossie, kimberley)\nforall x (Flower(x, kimberley) -> Doltish(x))\nFlower(kimberley, flossie) and Emasculate(kimberley) -> Equivocate(flossie, kimberley)\nforall x (Equivocate(x, flossie) and Disturbed(x) -> Flower(flossie, kimberley))\nforall x (Flower(x, flossie) -> Deionize(x, kimberley))\nDeionize(flossie, kimberley) -> Equivocate(kimberley, flossie)\nforall x (Flower(x, flossie) and Deionize(flossie, kimberley) -> Disturbed(flossie))\nHome(flossie) and Emasculate(flossie) -> Flower(flossie, kimberley)\nEquivocate(kimberley, flossie) -> Flower(kimberley, flossie)\n\nDeionize(flossie, kimberley)\n\ntherefore Deionize(flossie, kimberley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The alain is lighted. The jobye bubble the alain. If something flavour the alain then it is owing. If the alain flavour the jobye and the alain is venial then the jobye bench the alain. If something bench the jobye and it is oral then the jobye flavour the alain. If something flavour the jobye then it bubble the alain. If the jobye bubble the alain then the alain bench the jobye. If something flavour the jobye and the jobye bubble the alain then the jobye is oral. If the jobye is lighted and the jobye is venial then the jobye flavour the alain. If the alain bench the jobye then the alain flavour the jobye. The jobye does not like the alain.", "logic": "\nLighted(alain)\nBubble(jobye, alain)\nforall x (Flavour(x, alain) -> Owing(x))\nFlavour(alain, jobye) and Venial(alain) -> Bench(jobye, alain)\nforall x (Bench(x, jobye) and Oral(x) -> Flavour(jobye, alain))\nforall x (Flavour(x, jobye) -> Bubble(x, alain))\nBubble(jobye, alain) -> Bench(alain, jobye)\nforall x (Flavour(x, jobye) and Bubble(jobye, alain) -> Oral(jobye))\nLighted(jobye) and Venial(jobye) -> Flavour(jobye, alain)\nBench(alain, jobye) -> Flavour(alain, jobye)\n\nnot Bubble(jobye, alain)\n\ntherefore Bubble(jobye, alain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The flower is phenotypic. The winn palpate the flower. If something motorbike the flower then it is libidinal. If the flower motorbike the winn and the flower is worth then the winn bedraggle the flower. If something bedraggle the winn and it is northward then the winn motorbike the flower. If something motorbike the winn then it palpate the flower. If the winn palpate the flower then the flower bedraggle the winn. If something motorbike the winn and the winn palpate the flower then the winn is northward. If the winn is phenotypic and the winn is worth then the winn motorbike the flower. If the flower bedraggle the winn then the flower motorbike the winn. The flower bedraggle the winn.", "logic": "\nPhenotypic(flower)\nPalpate(winn, flower)\nforall x (Motorbike(x, flower) -> Libidinal(x))\nMotorbike(flower, winn) and Worth(flower) -> Bedraggle(winn, flower)\nforall x (Bedraggle(x, winn) and Northward(x) -> Motorbike(winn, flower))\nforall x (Motorbike(x, winn) -> Palpate(x, flower))\nPalpate(winn, flower) -> Bedraggle(flower, winn)\nforall x (Motorbike(x, winn) and Palpate(winn, flower) -> Northward(winn))\nPhenotypic(winn) and Worth(winn) -> Motorbike(winn, flower)\nBedraggle(flower, winn) -> Motorbike(flower, winn)\n\nBedraggle(flower, winn)\n\nPalpate(winn, flower) and Palpate(winn, flower) -> Bedraggle(flower, winn) -> therefore Bedraggle(flower, winn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The briana is bowelless. The robinette general the briana. If something connote the briana then it is emarginate. If the briana connote the robinette and the briana is petrifying then the robinette monger the briana. If something monger the robinette and it is anestrous then the robinette connote the briana. If something connote the robinette then it general the briana. If the robinette general the briana then the briana monger the robinette. If something connote the robinette and the robinette general the briana then the robinette is anestrous. If the robinette is bowelless and the robinette is petrifying then the robinette connote the briana. If the briana monger the robinette then the briana connote the robinette. The briana does not see the robinette.", "logic": "\nBowelless(briana)\nGeneral(robinette, briana)\nforall x (Connote(x, briana) -> Emarginate(x))\nConnote(briana, robinette) and Petrifying(briana) -> Monger(robinette, briana)\nforall x (Monger(x, robinette) and Anestrous(x) -> Connote(robinette, briana))\nforall x (Connote(x, robinette) -> General(x, briana))\nGeneral(robinette, briana) -> Monger(briana, robinette)\nforall x (Connote(x, robinette) and General(robinette, briana) -> Anestrous(robinette))\nBowelless(robinette) and Petrifying(robinette) -> Connote(robinette, briana)\nMonger(briana, robinette) -> Connote(briana, robinette)\n\nnot Monger(briana, robinette)\n\nGeneral(robinette, briana) and General(robinette, briana) -> Monger(briana, robinette) -> therefore Monger(briana, robinette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The roselin is acinar. The josh overcrop the roselin. If something wane the roselin then it is lumbar. If the roselin wane the josh and the roselin is smelly then the josh crew the roselin. If something crew the josh and it is depictive then the josh wane the roselin. If something wane the josh then it overcrop the roselin. If the josh overcrop the roselin then the roselin crew the josh. If something wane the josh and the josh overcrop the roselin then the josh is depictive. If the josh is acinar and the josh is smelly then the josh wane the roselin. If the roselin crew the josh then the roselin wane the josh. The roselin wane the josh.", "logic": "\nAcinar(roselin)\nOvercrop(josh, roselin)\nforall x (Wane(x, roselin) -> Lumbar(x))\nWane(roselin, josh) and Smelly(roselin) -> Crew(josh, roselin)\nforall x (Crew(x, josh) and Depictive(x) -> Wane(josh, roselin))\nforall x (Wane(x, josh) -> Overcrop(x, roselin))\nOvercrop(josh, roselin) -> Crew(roselin, josh)\nforall x (Wane(x, josh) and Overcrop(josh, roselin) -> Depictive(josh))\nAcinar(josh) and Smelly(josh) -> Wane(josh, roselin)\nCrew(roselin, josh) -> Wane(roselin, josh)\n\nWane(roselin, josh)\n\nOvercrop(josh, roselin) and Overcrop(josh, roselin) -> Crew(roselin, josh) -> therefore Crew(roselin, josh) Crew(roselin, josh) and Crew(roselin, josh) -> Wane(roselin, josh) -> therefore Wane(roselin, josh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The sylvester is nutrient. The socrates factorise the sylvester. If something preform the sylvester then it is trepid. If the sylvester preform the socrates and the sylvester is stately then the socrates disgust the sylvester. If something disgust the socrates and it is aplanatic then the socrates preform the sylvester. If something preform the socrates then it factorise the sylvester. If the socrates factorise the sylvester then the sylvester disgust the socrates. If something preform the socrates and the socrates factorise the sylvester then the socrates is aplanatic. If the socrates is nutrient and the socrates is stately then the socrates preform the sylvester. If the sylvester disgust the socrates then the sylvester preform the socrates. The sylvester does not chase the socrates.", "logic": "\nNutrient(sylvester)\nFactorise(socrates, sylvester)\nforall x (Preform(x, sylvester) -> Trepid(x))\nPreform(sylvester, socrates) and Stately(sylvester) -> Disgust(socrates, sylvester)\nforall x (Disgust(x, socrates) and Aplanatic(x) -> Preform(socrates, sylvester))\nforall x (Preform(x, socrates) -> Factorise(x, sylvester))\nFactorise(socrates, sylvester) -> Disgust(sylvester, socrates)\nforall x (Preform(x, socrates) and Factorise(socrates, sylvester) -> Aplanatic(socrates))\nNutrient(socrates) and Stately(socrates) -> Preform(socrates, sylvester)\nDisgust(sylvester, socrates) -> Preform(sylvester, socrates)\n\nnot Preform(sylvester, socrates)\n\nFactorise(socrates, sylvester) and Factorise(socrates, sylvester) -> Disgust(sylvester, socrates) -> therefore Disgust(sylvester, socrates) Disgust(sylvester, socrates) and Disgust(sylvester, socrates) -> Preform(sylvester, socrates) -> therefore Preform(sylvester, socrates)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The sela is assumed. The zebulon foretell the sela. If something heap the sela then it is laboring. If the sela heap the zebulon and the sela is eventful then the zebulon trend the sela. If something trend the zebulon and it is bush then the zebulon heap the sela. If something heap the zebulon then it foretell the sela. If the zebulon foretell the sela then the sela trend the zebulon. If something heap the zebulon and the zebulon foretell the sela then the zebulon is bush. If the zebulon is assumed and the zebulon is eventful then the zebulon heap the sela. If the sela trend the zebulon then the sela heap the zebulon. The zebulon is bush.", "logic": "\nAssumed(sela)\nForetell(zebulon, sela)\nforall x (Heap(x, sela) -> Laboring(x))\nHeap(sela, zebulon) and Eventful(sela) -> Trend(zebulon, sela)\nforall x (Trend(x, zebulon) and Bush(x) -> Heap(zebulon, sela))\nforall x (Heap(x, zebulon) -> Foretell(x, sela))\nForetell(zebulon, sela) -> Trend(sela, zebulon)\nforall x (Heap(x, zebulon) and Foretell(zebulon, sela) -> Bush(zebulon))\nAssumed(zebulon) and Eventful(zebulon) -> Heap(zebulon, sela)\nTrend(sela, zebulon) -> Heap(sela, zebulon)\n\nBush(zebulon)\n\nForetell(zebulon, sela) and Foretell(zebulon, sela) -> Trend(sela, zebulon) -> therefore Trend(sela, zebulon) Trend(sela, zebulon) and Trend(sela, zebulon) -> Heap(sela, zebulon) -> therefore Heap(sela, zebulon) Heap(sela, zebulon) and Foretell(zebulon, sela) and forall x (Heap(x, zebulon) and Foretell(zebulon, sela) -> Bush(zebulon)) -> therefore Bush(zebulon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The charleton is socialised. The stevana tidy the charleton. If something trill the charleton then it is swaybacked. If the charleton trill the stevana and the charleton is maniacal then the stevana goffer the charleton. If something goffer the stevana and it is unfocussed then the stevana trill the charleton. If something trill the stevana then it tidy the charleton. If the stevana tidy the charleton then the charleton goffer the stevana. If something trill the stevana and the stevana tidy the charleton then the stevana is unfocussed. If the stevana is socialised and the stevana is maniacal then the stevana trill the charleton. If the charleton goffer the stevana then the charleton trill the stevana. The charleton does not like the charleton.", "logic": "\nSocialised(charleton)\nTidy(stevana, charleton)\nforall x (Trill(x, charleton) -> Swaybacked(x))\nTrill(charleton, stevana) and Maniacal(charleton) -> Goffer(stevana, charleton)\nforall x (Goffer(x, stevana) and Unfocussed(x) -> Trill(stevana, charleton))\nforall x (Trill(x, stevana) -> Tidy(x, charleton))\nTidy(stevana, charleton) -> Goffer(charleton, stevana)\nforall x (Trill(x, stevana) and Tidy(stevana, charleton) -> Unfocussed(stevana))\nSocialised(stevana) and Maniacal(stevana) -> Trill(stevana, charleton)\nGoffer(charleton, stevana) -> Trill(charleton, stevana)\n\nnot Tidy(charleton, charleton)\n\nTidy(stevana, charleton) and Tidy(stevana, charleton) -> Goffer(charleton, stevana) -> therefore Goffer(charleton, stevana) Goffer(charleton, stevana) and Goffer(charleton, stevana) -> Trill(charleton, stevana) -> therefore Trill(charleton, stevana) Trill(charleton, stevana) and forall x (Trill(x, stevana) -> Tidy(x, charleton)) -> therefore Tidy(charleton, charleton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The kimmo is woeful. The weber dislodge the kimmo. If something disfavour the kimmo then it is austere. If the kimmo disfavour the weber and the kimmo is awesome then the weber gain the kimmo. If something gain the weber and it is expandable then the weber disfavour the kimmo. If something disfavour the weber then it dislodge the kimmo. If the weber dislodge the kimmo then the kimmo gain the weber. If something disfavour the weber and the weber dislodge the kimmo then the weber is expandable. If the weber is woeful and the weber is awesome then the weber disfavour the kimmo. If the kimmo gain the weber then the kimmo disfavour the weber. The kimmo is not austere.", "logic": "\nWoeful(kimmo)\nDislodge(weber, kimmo)\nforall x (Disfavour(x, kimmo) -> Austere(x))\nDisfavour(kimmo, weber) and Awesome(kimmo) -> Gain(weber, kimmo)\nforall x (Gain(x, weber) and Expandable(x) -> Disfavour(weber, kimmo))\nforall x (Disfavour(x, weber) -> Dislodge(x, kimmo))\nDislodge(weber, kimmo) -> Gain(kimmo, weber)\nforall x (Disfavour(x, weber) and Dislodge(weber, kimmo) -> Expandable(weber))\nWoeful(weber) and Awesome(weber) -> Disfavour(weber, kimmo)\nGain(kimmo, weber) -> Disfavour(kimmo, weber)\n\nnot Austere(kimmo)\n\nforall x (Disfavour(x, kimmo) -> Austere(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The eugene is beginning. The lissie steady the eugene. If something dine the eugene then it is lumbar. If the eugene dine the lissie and the eugene is second then the lissie unstrain the eugene. If something unstrain the lissie and it is rosaceous then the lissie dine the eugene. If something dine the lissie then it steady the eugene. If the lissie steady the eugene then the eugene unstrain the lissie. If something dine the lissie and the lissie steady the eugene then the lissie is rosaceous. If the lissie is beginning and the lissie is second then the lissie dine the eugene. If the eugene unstrain the lissie then the eugene dine the lissie. The lissie dine the eugene.", "logic": "\nBeginning(eugene)\nSteady(lissie, eugene)\nforall x (Dine(x, eugene) -> Lumbar(x))\nDine(eugene, lissie) and Second(eugene) -> Unstrain(lissie, eugene)\nforall x (Unstrain(x, lissie) and Rosaceous(x) -> Dine(lissie, eugene))\nforall x (Dine(x, lissie) -> Steady(x, eugene))\nSteady(lissie, eugene) -> Unstrain(eugene, lissie)\nforall x (Dine(x, lissie) and Steady(lissie, eugene) -> Rosaceous(lissie))\nBeginning(lissie) and Second(lissie) -> Dine(lissie, eugene)\nUnstrain(eugene, lissie) -> Dine(eugene, lissie)\n\nDine(lissie, eugene)\n\nforall x (Unstrain(x, lissie) and Rosaceous(x) -> Dine(lissie, eugene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The wildon is transposed. The mickie wend the wildon. If something stabilise the wildon then it is conversant. If the wildon stabilise the mickie and the wildon is headfirst then the mickie misjudge the wildon. If something misjudge the mickie and it is embedded then the mickie stabilise the wildon. If something stabilise the mickie then it wend the wildon. If the mickie wend the wildon then the wildon misjudge the mickie. If something stabilise the mickie and the mickie wend the wildon then the mickie is embedded. If the mickie is transposed and the mickie is headfirst then the mickie stabilise the wildon. If the wildon misjudge the mickie then the wildon stabilise the mickie. The mickie does not see the wildon.", "logic": "\nTransposed(wildon)\nWend(mickie, wildon)\nforall x (Stabilise(x, wildon) -> Conversant(x))\nStabilise(wildon, mickie) and Headfirst(wildon) -> Misjudge(mickie, wildon)\nforall x (Misjudge(x, mickie) and Embedded(x) -> Stabilise(mickie, wildon))\nforall x (Stabilise(x, mickie) -> Wend(x, wildon))\nWend(mickie, wildon) -> Misjudge(wildon, mickie)\nforall x (Stabilise(x, mickie) and Wend(mickie, wildon) -> Embedded(mickie))\nTransposed(mickie) and Headfirst(mickie) -> Stabilise(mickie, wildon)\nMisjudge(wildon, mickie) -> Stabilise(wildon, mickie)\n\nnot Misjudge(mickie, wildon)\n\nStabilise(wildon, mickie) and Headfirst(wildon) -> Misjudge(mickie, wildon) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The genia is lvii. The raye yack the genia. If something right the genia then it is litigious. If the genia right the raye and the genia is typical then the raye silver the genia. If something silver the raye and it is isotropous then the raye right the genia. If something right the raye then it yack the genia. If the raye yack the genia then the genia silver the raye. If something right the raye and the raye yack the genia then the raye is isotropous. If the raye is lvii and the raye is typical then the raye right the genia. If the genia silver the raye then the genia right the raye. The raye is litigious.", "logic": "\nLvii(genia)\nYack(raye, genia)\nforall x (Right(x, genia) -> Litigious(x))\nRight(genia, raye) and Typical(genia) -> Silver(raye, genia)\nforall x (Silver(x, raye) and Isotropous(x) -> Right(raye, genia))\nforall x (Right(x, raye) -> Yack(x, genia))\nYack(raye, genia) -> Silver(genia, raye)\nforall x (Right(x, raye) and Yack(raye, genia) -> Isotropous(raye))\nLvii(raye) and Typical(raye) -> Right(raye, genia)\nSilver(genia, raye) -> Right(genia, raye)\n\nLitigious(raye)\n\nforall x (Right(x, genia) -> Litigious(x)) <- forall x (Silver(x, raye) and Isotropous(x) -> Right(raye, genia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The prudy is foolproof. The michele blunt the prudy. If something plagiarise the prudy then it is xxxv. If the prudy plagiarise the michele and the prudy is spangly then the michele attemper the prudy. If something attemper the michele and it is uncensored then the michele plagiarise the prudy. If something plagiarise the michele then it blunt the prudy. If the michele blunt the prudy then the prudy attemper the michele. If something plagiarise the michele and the michele blunt the prudy then the michele is uncensored. If the michele is foolproof and the michele is spangly then the michele plagiarise the prudy. If the prudy attemper the michele then the prudy plagiarise the michele. The michele does not chase the michele.", "logic": "\nFoolproof(prudy)\nBlunt(michele, prudy)\nforall x (Plagiarise(x, prudy) -> Xxxv(x))\nPlagiarise(prudy, michele) and Spangly(prudy) -> Attemper(michele, prudy)\nforall x (Attemper(x, michele) and Uncensored(x) -> Plagiarise(michele, prudy))\nforall x (Plagiarise(x, michele) -> Blunt(x, prudy))\nBlunt(michele, prudy) -> Attemper(prudy, michele)\nforall x (Plagiarise(x, michele) and Blunt(michele, prudy) -> Uncensored(michele))\nFoolproof(michele) and Spangly(michele) -> Plagiarise(michele, prudy)\nAttemper(prudy, michele) -> Plagiarise(prudy, michele)\n\nnot Plagiarise(michele, michele)\n\nnot Plagiarise(michele, michele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The joline is edentulous. The mimi prize the joline. If something agree the joline then it is xciii. If the joline agree the mimi and the joline is chalky then the mimi merge the joline. If something merge the mimi and it is volatile then the mimi agree the joline. If something agree the mimi then it prize the joline. If the mimi prize the joline then the joline merge the mimi. If something agree the mimi and the mimi prize the joline then the mimi is volatile. If the mimi is edentulous and the mimi is chalky then the mimi agree the joline. If the joline merge the mimi then the joline agree the mimi. The mimi prize the mimi.", "logic": "\nEdentulous(joline)\nPrize(mimi, joline)\nforall x (Agree(x, joline) -> Xciii(x))\nAgree(joline, mimi) and Chalky(joline) -> Merge(mimi, joline)\nforall x (Merge(x, mimi) and Volatile(x) -> Agree(mimi, joline))\nforall x (Agree(x, mimi) -> Prize(x, joline))\nPrize(mimi, joline) -> Merge(joline, mimi)\nforall x (Agree(x, mimi) and Prize(mimi, joline) -> Volatile(mimi))\nEdentulous(mimi) and Chalky(mimi) -> Agree(mimi, joline)\nMerge(joline, mimi) -> Agree(joline, mimi)\n\nPrize(mimi, mimi)\n\nPrize(mimi, mimi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The karyl is mysophobic. The nisa obstruct the karyl. If something alter the karyl then it is yogistic. If the karyl alter the nisa and the karyl is enraptured then the nisa backfire the karyl. If something backfire the nisa and it is lxxx then the nisa alter the karyl. If something alter the nisa then it obstruct the karyl. If the nisa obstruct the karyl then the karyl backfire the nisa. If something alter the nisa and the nisa obstruct the karyl then the nisa is lxxx. If the nisa is mysophobic and the nisa is enraptured then the nisa alter the karyl. If the karyl backfire the nisa then the karyl alter the nisa. The karyl is not lxxx.", "logic": "\nMysophobic(karyl)\nObstruct(nisa, karyl)\nforall x (Alter(x, karyl) -> Yogistic(x))\nAlter(karyl, nisa) and Enraptured(karyl) -> Backfire(nisa, karyl)\nforall x (Backfire(x, nisa) and Lxxx(x) -> Alter(nisa, karyl))\nforall x (Alter(x, nisa) -> Obstruct(x, karyl))\nObstruct(nisa, karyl) -> Backfire(karyl, nisa)\nforall x (Alter(x, nisa) and Obstruct(nisa, karyl) -> Lxxx(nisa))\nMysophobic(nisa) and Enraptured(nisa) -> Alter(nisa, karyl)\nBackfire(karyl, nisa) -> Alter(karyl, nisa)\n\nnot Lxxx(karyl)\n\nnot Lxxx(karyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "The meyer is avestan. The mylo bevel the meyer. If something grope the meyer then it is tiny. If the meyer grope the mylo and the meyer is splayfoot then the mylo italicise the meyer. If something italicise the mylo and it is rampant then the mylo grope the meyer. If something grope the mylo then it bevel the meyer. If the mylo bevel the meyer then the meyer italicise the mylo. If something grope the mylo and the mylo bevel the meyer then the mylo is rampant. If the mylo is avestan and the mylo is splayfoot then the mylo grope the meyer. If the meyer italicise the mylo then the meyer grope the mylo. The meyer is splayfoot.", "logic": "\nAvestan(meyer)\nBevel(mylo, meyer)\nforall x (Grope(x, meyer) -> Tiny(x))\nGrope(meyer, mylo) and Splayfoot(meyer) -> Italicise(mylo, meyer)\nforall x (Italicise(x, mylo) and Rampant(x) -> Grope(mylo, meyer))\nforall x (Grope(x, mylo) -> Bevel(x, meyer))\nBevel(mylo, meyer) -> Italicise(meyer, mylo)\nforall x (Grope(x, mylo) and Bevel(mylo, meyer) -> Rampant(mylo))\nAvestan(mylo) and Splayfoot(mylo) -> Grope(mylo, meyer)\nItalicise(meyer, mylo) -> Grope(meyer, mylo)\n\nSplayfoot(meyer)\n\nSplayfoot(meyer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1131"} {"premises": "Suzette is recurrent. Cassandre is gauzy. Danelle is not conceptive. Quiet people are antecedent. If Danelle is not recurrent and Danelle is not auditive then Danelle is antecedent. If Cassandre is recurrent and Cassandre is not abomasal then Cassandre is conceptive. If Suzette is antecedent then Suzette is conceptive. All recurrent people are gauzy. If Cassandre is auditive and Cassandre is not conceptive then Cassandre is antecedent. Cassandre is gauzy.", "logic": "\nRecurrent(suzette)\nGauzy(cassandre)\nnot Conceptive(danelle)\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> Antecedent(x))\nnot Recurrent(danelle) and not Auditive(danelle) -> Antecedent(danelle)\nRecurrent(cassandre) and not Abomasal(cassandre) -> Conceptive(cassandre)\nAntecedent(suzette) -> Conceptive(suzette)\nforall x (Recurrent(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nAuditive(cassandre) and not Conceptive(cassandre) -> Antecedent(cassandre)\n\nGauzy(cassandre)\n\ntherefore Gauzy(cassandre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Neel is chiasmal. Margot is unwrinkled. Charita is not fastened. Quiet people are shocked. If Charita is not chiasmal and Charita is not sappy then Charita is shocked. If Margot is chiasmal and Margot is not shouted then Margot is fastened. If Neel is shocked then Neel is fastened. All chiasmal people are unwrinkled. If Margot is sappy and Margot is not fastened then Margot is shocked. Margot is not unwrinkled.", "logic": "\nChiasmal(neel)\nUnwrinkled(margot)\nnot Fastened(charita)\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Shocked(x))\nnot Chiasmal(charita) and not Sappy(charita) -> Shocked(charita)\nChiasmal(margot) and not Shouted(margot) -> Fastened(margot)\nShocked(neel) -> Fastened(neel)\nforall x (Chiasmal(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nSappy(margot) and not Fastened(margot) -> Shocked(margot)\n\nnot Unwrinkled(margot)\n\ntherefore Unwrinkled(margot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Sigmund is bragging. Tulley is appellate. Elmer is not unseemly. Quiet people are sudanese. If Elmer is not bragging and Elmer is not blowy then Elmer is sudanese. If Tulley is bragging and Tulley is not areal then Tulley is unseemly. If Sigmund is sudanese then Sigmund is unseemly. All bragging people are appellate. If Tulley is blowy and Tulley is not unseemly then Tulley is sudanese. Sigmund is appellate.", "logic": "\nBragging(sigmund)\nAppellate(tulley)\nnot Unseemly(elmer)\nforall x (Appellate(x) -> Sudanese(x))\nnot Bragging(elmer) and not Blowy(elmer) -> Sudanese(elmer)\nBragging(tulley) and not Areal(tulley) -> Unseemly(tulley)\nSudanese(sigmund) -> Unseemly(sigmund)\nforall x (Bragging(x) -> Appellate(x))\nBlowy(tulley) and not Unseemly(tulley) -> Sudanese(tulley)\n\nAppellate(sigmund)\n\nBragging(sigmund) and forall x (Bragging(x) -> Appellate(x)) -> therefore Appellate(sigmund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Mason is unwedded. Caty is alary. Abdul is not combined. Quiet people are cuticular. If Abdul is not unwedded and Abdul is not satellite then Abdul is cuticular. If Caty is unwedded and Caty is not ungracious then Caty is combined. If Mason is cuticular then Mason is combined. All unwedded people are alary. If Caty is satellite and Caty is not combined then Caty is cuticular. Mason is not alary.", "logic": "\nUnwedded(mason)\nAlary(caty)\nnot Combined(abdul)\nforall x (Alary(x) -> Cuticular(x))\nnot Unwedded(abdul) and not Satellite(abdul) -> Cuticular(abdul)\nUnwedded(caty) and not Ungracious(caty) -> Combined(caty)\nCuticular(mason) -> Combined(mason)\nforall x (Unwedded(x) -> Alary(x))\nSatellite(caty) and not Combined(caty) -> Cuticular(caty)\n\nnot Alary(mason)\n\nUnwedded(mason) and forall x (Unwedded(x) -> Alary(x)) -> therefore Alary(mason)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Binnie is aplitic. Sherwynd is wizard. Neely is not mercuric. Quiet people are katari. If Neely is not aplitic and Neely is not shapely then Neely is katari. If Sherwynd is aplitic and Sherwynd is not tinned then Sherwynd is mercuric. If Binnie is katari then Binnie is mercuric. All aplitic people are wizard. If Sherwynd is shapely and Sherwynd is not mercuric then Sherwynd is katari. Binnie is katari.", "logic": "\nAplitic(binnie)\nWizard(sherwynd)\nnot Mercuric(neely)\nforall x (Wizard(x) -> Katari(x))\nnot Aplitic(neely) and not Shapely(neely) -> Katari(neely)\nAplitic(sherwynd) and not Tinned(sherwynd) -> Mercuric(sherwynd)\nKatari(binnie) -> Mercuric(binnie)\nforall x (Aplitic(x) -> Wizard(x))\nShapely(sherwynd) and not Mercuric(sherwynd) -> Katari(sherwynd)\n\nKatari(binnie)\n\nAplitic(binnie) and forall x (Aplitic(x) -> Wizard(x)) -> therefore Wizard(binnie) Wizard(binnie) and forall x (Wizard(x) -> Katari(x)) -> therefore Katari(binnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Cynthea is cumulative. Pammi is bumpy. Goober is not goddam. Quiet people are circadian. If Goober is not cumulative and Goober is not tantric then Goober is circadian. If Pammi is cumulative and Pammi is not unwavering then Pammi is goddam. If Cynthea is circadian then Cynthea is goddam. All cumulative people are bumpy. If Pammi is tantric and Pammi is not goddam then Pammi is circadian. Cynthea is not circadian.", "logic": "\nCumulative(cynthea)\nBumpy(pammi)\nnot Goddam(goober)\nforall x (Bumpy(x) -> Circadian(x))\nnot Cumulative(goober) and not Tantric(goober) -> Circadian(goober)\nCumulative(pammi) and not Unwavering(pammi) -> Goddam(pammi)\nCircadian(cynthea) -> Goddam(cynthea)\nforall x (Cumulative(x) -> Bumpy(x))\nTantric(pammi) and not Goddam(pammi) -> Circadian(pammi)\n\nnot Circadian(cynthea)\n\nCumulative(cynthea) and forall x (Cumulative(x) -> Bumpy(x)) -> therefore Bumpy(cynthea) Bumpy(cynthea) and forall x (Bumpy(x) -> Circadian(x)) -> therefore Circadian(cynthea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Ileane is specious. Stephine is almighty. Krystalle is not romanic. Quiet people are penumbral. If Krystalle is not specious and Krystalle is not reactive then Krystalle is penumbral. If Stephine is specious and Stephine is not ototoxic then Stephine is romanic. If Ileane is penumbral then Ileane is romanic. All specious people are almighty. If Stephine is reactive and Stephine is not romanic then Stephine is penumbral. Ileane is romanic.", "logic": "\nSpecious(ileane)\nAlmighty(stephine)\nnot Romanic(krystalle)\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nnot Specious(krystalle) and not Reactive(krystalle) -> Penumbral(krystalle)\nSpecious(stephine) and not Ototoxic(stephine) -> Romanic(stephine)\nPenumbral(ileane) -> Romanic(ileane)\nforall x (Specious(x) -> Almighty(x))\nReactive(stephine) and not Romanic(stephine) -> Penumbral(stephine)\n\nRomanic(ileane)\n\nSpecious(ileane) and forall x (Specious(x) -> Almighty(x)) -> therefore Almighty(ileane) Almighty(ileane) and forall x (Almighty(x) -> Penumbral(x)) -> therefore Penumbral(ileane) Penumbral(ileane) and Penumbral(ileane) -> Romanic(ileane) -> therefore Romanic(ileane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Ariella is skirting. Wyatan is sickish. Modestia is not returning. Quiet people are sunstruck. If Modestia is not skirting and Modestia is not aimless then Modestia is sunstruck. If Wyatan is skirting and Wyatan is not lxxvi then Wyatan is returning. If Ariella is sunstruck then Ariella is returning. All skirting people are sickish. If Wyatan is aimless and Wyatan is not returning then Wyatan is sunstruck. Ariella is not returning.", "logic": "\nSkirting(ariella)\nSickish(wyatan)\nnot Returning(modestia)\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\nnot Skirting(modestia) and not Aimless(modestia) -> Sunstruck(modestia)\nSkirting(wyatan) and not Lxxvi(wyatan) -> Returning(wyatan)\nSunstruck(ariella) -> Returning(ariella)\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Sickish(x))\nAimless(wyatan) and not Returning(wyatan) -> Sunstruck(wyatan)\n\nnot Returning(ariella)\n\nSkirting(ariella) and forall x (Skirting(x) -> Sickish(x)) -> therefore Sickish(ariella) Sickish(ariella) and forall x (Sickish(x) -> Sunstruck(x)) -> therefore Sunstruck(ariella) Sunstruck(ariella) and Sunstruck(ariella) -> Returning(ariella) -> therefore Returning(ariella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Randolph is libidinal. Marketa is anarchic. Lira is not symphonic. Quiet people are satellite. If Lira is not libidinal and Lira is not paranoid then Lira is satellite. If Marketa is libidinal and Marketa is not vestmental then Marketa is symphonic. If Randolph is satellite then Randolph is symphonic. All libidinal people are anarchic. If Marketa is paranoid and Marketa is not symphonic then Marketa is satellite. Lira is not satellite.", "logic": "\nLibidinal(randolph)\nAnarchic(marketa)\nnot Symphonic(lira)\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Satellite(x))\nnot Libidinal(lira) and not Paranoid(lira) -> Satellite(lira)\nLibidinal(marketa) and not Vestmental(marketa) -> Symphonic(marketa)\nSatellite(randolph) -> Symphonic(randolph)\nforall x (Libidinal(x) -> Anarchic(x))\nParanoid(marketa) and not Symphonic(marketa) -> Satellite(marketa)\n\nnot Satellite(lira)\n\nforall x (Anarchic(x) -> Satellite(x)) <- forall x (Libidinal(x) -> Anarchic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Misha is pemphigous. Dionysus is welcoming. Minda is not dentate. Quiet people are roughhewn. If Minda is not pemphigous and Minda is not blusterous then Minda is roughhewn. If Dionysus is pemphigous and Dionysus is not promotive then Dionysus is dentate. If Misha is roughhewn then Misha is dentate. All pemphigous people are welcoming. If Dionysus is blusterous and Dionysus is not dentate then Dionysus is roughhewn. Dionysus is dentate.", "logic": "\nPemphigous(misha)\nWelcoming(dionysus)\nnot Dentate(minda)\nforall x (Welcoming(x) -> Roughhewn(x))\nnot Pemphigous(minda) and not Blusterous(minda) -> Roughhewn(minda)\nPemphigous(dionysus) and not Promotive(dionysus) -> Dentate(dionysus)\nRoughhewn(misha) -> Dentate(misha)\nforall x (Pemphigous(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nBlusterous(dionysus) and not Dentate(dionysus) -> Roughhewn(dionysus)\n\nDentate(dionysus)\n\nPemphigous(dionysus) and not Promotive(dionysus) -> Dentate(dionysus) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Mignonne is sclerosed. Elihu is darling. Salvidor is not antiknock. Quiet people are nefarious. If Salvidor is not sclerosed and Salvidor is not unrevised then Salvidor is nefarious. If Elihu is sclerosed and Elihu is not corking then Elihu is antiknock. If Mignonne is nefarious then Mignonne is antiknock. All sclerosed people are darling. If Elihu is unrevised and Elihu is not antiknock then Elihu is nefarious. Salvidor is not darling.", "logic": "\nSclerosed(mignonne)\nDarling(elihu)\nnot Antiknock(salvidor)\nforall x (Darling(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nnot Sclerosed(salvidor) and not Unrevised(salvidor) -> Nefarious(salvidor)\nSclerosed(elihu) and not Corking(elihu) -> Antiknock(elihu)\nNefarious(mignonne) -> Antiknock(mignonne)\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Darling(x))\nUnrevised(elihu) and not Antiknock(elihu) -> Nefarious(elihu)\n\nnot Darling(salvidor)\n\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Darling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Antonino is antigenic. Guillema is andante. Benji is not adulatory. Quiet people are unsatiated. If Benji is not antigenic and Benji is not unmelodic then Benji is unsatiated. If Guillema is antigenic and Guillema is not toasted then Guillema is adulatory. If Antonino is unsatiated then Antonino is adulatory. All antigenic people are andante. If Guillema is unmelodic and Guillema is not adulatory then Guillema is unsatiated. Guillema is cold.", "logic": "\nAntigenic(antonino)\nAndante(guillema)\nnot Adulatory(benji)\nforall x (Andante(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nnot Antigenic(benji) and not Unmelodic(benji) -> Unsatiated(benji)\nAntigenic(guillema) and not Toasted(guillema) -> Adulatory(guillema)\nUnsatiated(antonino) -> Adulatory(antonino)\nforall x (Antigenic(x) -> Andante(x))\nUnmelodic(guillema) and not Adulatory(guillema) -> Unsatiated(guillema)\n\nCold(guillema)\n\nCold(guillema) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Trenton is mitral. Lynett is fistulate. Aurora is not convincing. Quiet people are crappy. If Aurora is not mitral and Aurora is not xciii then Aurora is crappy. If Lynett is mitral and Lynett is not mutative then Lynett is convincing. If Trenton is crappy then Trenton is convincing. All mitral people are fistulate. If Lynett is xciii and Lynett is not convincing then Lynett is crappy. Trenton is not mutative.", "logic": "\nMitral(trenton)\nFistulate(lynett)\nnot Convincing(aurora)\nforall x (Fistulate(x) -> Crappy(x))\nnot Mitral(aurora) and not Xciii(aurora) -> Crappy(aurora)\nMitral(lynett) and not Mutative(lynett) -> Convincing(lynett)\nCrappy(trenton) -> Convincing(trenton)\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> Fistulate(x))\nXciii(lynett) and not Convincing(lynett) -> Crappy(lynett)\n\nnot Mutative(trenton)\n\nnot Mutative(trenton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Hyatt is unamended. Hobart is constant. Shoshie is not extensive. Quiet people are consuming. If Shoshie is not unamended and Shoshie is not offshore then Shoshie is consuming. If Hobart is unamended and Hobart is not bookish then Hobart is extensive. If Hyatt is consuming then Hyatt is extensive. All unamended people are constant. If Hobart is offshore and Hobart is not extensive then Hobart is consuming. Hobart is bookish.", "logic": "\nUnamended(hyatt)\nConstant(hobart)\nnot Extensive(shoshie)\nforall x (Constant(x) -> Consuming(x))\nnot Unamended(shoshie) and not Offshore(shoshie) -> Consuming(shoshie)\nUnamended(hobart) and not Bookish(hobart) -> Extensive(hobart)\nConsuming(hyatt) -> Extensive(hyatt)\nforall x (Unamended(x) -> Constant(x))\nOffshore(hobart) and not Extensive(hobart) -> Consuming(hobart)\n\nBookish(hobart)\n\nBookish(hobart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Lydie is bicolor. Hyacinthe is noticeable. Cyril is not borderline. Quiet people are elder. If Cyril is not bicolor and Cyril is not unswayed then Cyril is elder. If Hyacinthe is bicolor and Hyacinthe is not gerundial then Hyacinthe is borderline. If Lydie is elder then Lydie is borderline. All bicolor people are noticeable. If Hyacinthe is unswayed and Hyacinthe is not borderline then Hyacinthe is elder. Lydie is not cold.", "logic": "\nBicolor(lydie)\nNoticeable(hyacinthe)\nnot Borderline(cyril)\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Elder(x))\nnot Bicolor(cyril) and not Unswayed(cyril) -> Elder(cyril)\nBicolor(hyacinthe) and not Gerundial(hyacinthe) -> Borderline(hyacinthe)\nElder(lydie) -> Borderline(lydie)\nforall x (Bicolor(x) -> Noticeable(x))\nUnswayed(hyacinthe) and not Borderline(hyacinthe) -> Elder(hyacinthe)\n\nnot Cold(lydie)\n\nnot Cold(lydie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "Tyrus is palmlike. Rowland is assuming. Cassandra is not unsaid. Quiet people are scapose. If Cassandra is not palmlike and Cassandra is not unseamed then Cassandra is scapose. If Rowland is palmlike and Rowland is not metatarsal then Rowland is unsaid. If Tyrus is scapose then Tyrus is unsaid. All palmlike people are assuming. If Rowland is unseamed and Rowland is not unsaid then Rowland is scapose. Rowland is palmlike.", "logic": "\nPalmlike(tyrus)\nAssuming(rowland)\nnot Unsaid(cassandra)\nforall x (Assuming(x) -> Scapose(x))\nnot Palmlike(cassandra) and not Unseamed(cassandra) -> Scapose(cassandra)\nPalmlike(rowland) and not Metatarsal(rowland) -> Unsaid(rowland)\nScapose(tyrus) -> Unsaid(tyrus)\nforall x (Palmlike(x) -> Assuming(x))\nUnseamed(rowland) and not Unsaid(rowland) -> Scapose(rowland)\n\nPalmlike(rowland)\n\nPalmlike(rowland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-75"} {"premises": "The esma is cyclonical. If someone is historic then they are basidial. If someone is historic and immoveable then they are cyclonical. All cyclonical people are elfish. Kind people are immoveable. Young people are immoveable. If someone is elfish then they are historic. All historic, cyclonical people are basidial. If someone is cyclonical and historic then they are immoveable. The esma is cyclonical.", "logic": "\nCyclonical(esma)\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) and Immoveable(x) -> Cyclonical(x))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) -> Elfish(x))\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) -> Historic(x))\nforall x (Historic(x) and Cyclonical(x) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) and Historic(x) -> Immoveable(x))\n\nCyclonical(esma)\n\ntherefore Cyclonical(esma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The aubree is patronized. If someone is biogenous then they are censorious. If someone is biogenous and columnar then they are patronized. All patronized people are cleansing. Kind people are columnar. Young people are columnar. If someone is cleansing then they are biogenous. All biogenous, patronized people are censorious. If someone is patronized and biogenous then they are columnar. The aubree is not patronized.", "logic": "\nPatronized(aubree)\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Biogenous(x) and Columnar(x) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Patronized(x) -> Cleansing(x))\nforall x (Censorious(x) -> Columnar(x))\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Columnar(x))\nforall x (Cleansing(x) -> Biogenous(x))\nforall x (Biogenous(x) and Patronized(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Patronized(x) and Biogenous(x) -> Columnar(x))\n\nnot Patronized(aubree)\n\ntherefore Patronized(aubree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The rolfe is commercial. If someone is inelastic then they are tritanopic. If someone is inelastic and defeated then they are commercial. All commercial people are quadratic. Kind people are defeated. Young people are defeated. If someone is quadratic then they are inelastic. All inelastic, commercial people are tritanopic. If someone is commercial and inelastic then they are defeated. The rolfe is quadratic.", "logic": "\nCommercial(rolfe)\nforall x (Inelastic(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Defeated(x) -> Commercial(x))\nforall x (Commercial(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Inelastic(x) and Commercial(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Commercial(x) and Inelastic(x) -> Defeated(x))\n\nQuadratic(rolfe)\n\nCommercial(rolfe) and forall x (Commercial(x) -> Quadratic(x)) -> therefore Quadratic(rolfe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The nance is equitable. If someone is jocund then they are paranoid. If someone is jocund and whatever then they are equitable. All equitable people are wishful. Kind people are whatever. Young people are whatever. If someone is wishful then they are jocund. All jocund, equitable people are paranoid. If someone is equitable and jocund then they are whatever. The nance is not wishful.", "logic": "\nEquitable(nance)\nforall x (Jocund(x) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) and Whatever(x) -> Equitable(x))\nforall x (Equitable(x) -> Wishful(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) -> Whatever(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) -> Whatever(x))\nforall x (Wishful(x) -> Jocund(x))\nforall x (Jocund(x) and Equitable(x) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Equitable(x) and Jocund(x) -> Whatever(x))\n\nnot Wishful(nance)\n\nEquitable(nance) and forall x (Equitable(x) -> Wishful(x)) -> therefore Wishful(nance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The ferdinand is unraised. If someone is unshorn then they are hypnotic. If someone is unshorn and hornlike then they are unraised. All unraised people are unironed. Kind people are hornlike. Young people are hornlike. If someone is unironed then they are unshorn. All unshorn, unraised people are hypnotic. If someone is unraised and unshorn then they are hornlike. The ferdinand is unshorn.", "logic": "\nUnraised(ferdinand)\nforall x (Unshorn(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\nforall x (Unshorn(x) and Hornlike(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> Unironed(x))\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Hornlike(x))\nforall x (Unshorn(x) -> Hornlike(x))\nforall x (Unironed(x) -> Unshorn(x))\nforall x (Unshorn(x) and Unraised(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) and Unshorn(x) -> Hornlike(x))\n\nUnshorn(ferdinand)\n\nUnraised(ferdinand) and forall x (Unraised(x) -> Unironed(x)) -> therefore Unironed(ferdinand) Unironed(ferdinand) and forall x (Unironed(x) -> Unshorn(x)) -> therefore Unshorn(ferdinand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The ross is reniform. If someone is sovereign then they are asocial. If someone is sovereign and forgivable then they are reniform. All reniform people are blase. Kind people are forgivable. Young people are forgivable. If someone is blase then they are sovereign. All sovereign, reniform people are asocial. If someone is reniform and sovereign then they are forgivable. The ross is not sovereign.", "logic": "\nReniform(ross)\nforall x (Sovereign(x) -> Asocial(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Forgivable(x) -> Reniform(x))\nforall x (Reniform(x) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Asocial(x) -> Forgivable(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) -> Forgivable(x))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Reniform(x) -> Asocial(x))\nforall x (Reniform(x) and Sovereign(x) -> Forgivable(x))\n\nnot Sovereign(ross)\n\nReniform(ross) and forall x (Reniform(x) -> Blase(x)) -> therefore Blase(ross) Blase(ross) and forall x (Blase(x) -> Sovereign(x)) -> therefore Sovereign(ross)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The micky is fourscore. If someone is sectorial then they are impious. If someone is sectorial and lipophilic then they are fourscore. All fourscore people are ballistic. Kind people are lipophilic. Young people are lipophilic. If someone is ballistic then they are sectorial. All sectorial, fourscore people are impious. If someone is fourscore and sectorial then they are lipophilic. The micky is lipophilic.", "logic": "\nFourscore(micky)\nforall x (Sectorial(x) -> Impious(x))\nforall x (Sectorial(x) and Lipophilic(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Impious(x) -> Lipophilic(x))\nforall x (Sectorial(x) -> Lipophilic(x))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Sectorial(x))\nforall x (Sectorial(x) and Fourscore(x) -> Impious(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Sectorial(x) -> Lipophilic(x))\n\nLipophilic(micky)\n\nFourscore(micky) and forall x (Fourscore(x) -> Ballistic(x)) -> therefore Ballistic(micky) Ballistic(micky) and forall x (Ballistic(x) -> Sectorial(x)) -> therefore Sectorial(micky) Sectorial(micky) and forall x (Sectorial(x) -> Lipophilic(x)) -> therefore Lipophilic(micky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The janeva is factitious. If someone is deciphered then they are wakeful. If someone is deciphered and successful then they are factitious. All factitious people are charged. Kind people are successful. Young people are successful. If someone is charged then they are deciphered. All deciphered, factitious people are wakeful. If someone is factitious and deciphered then they are successful. The janeva is not wakeful.", "logic": "\nFactitious(janeva)\nforall x (Deciphered(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Successful(x) -> Factitious(x))\nforall x (Factitious(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) -> Successful(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) -> Successful(x))\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Factitious(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Factitious(x) and Deciphered(x) -> Successful(x))\n\nnot Wakeful(janeva)\n\nFactitious(janeva) and forall x (Factitious(x) -> Charged(x)) -> therefore Charged(janeva) Charged(janeva) and forall x (Charged(x) -> Deciphered(x)) -> therefore Deciphered(janeva) Deciphered(janeva) and forall x (Deciphered(x) -> Wakeful(x)) -> therefore Wakeful(janeva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The wyndham is genotypic. If someone is skilled then they are cragged. If someone is skilled and pally then they are genotypic. All genotypic people are eroded. Kind people are pally. Young people are pally. If someone is eroded then they are skilled. All skilled, genotypic people are cragged. If someone is genotypic and skilled then they are pally. The wyndham does not see the wyndham.", "logic": "\nGenotypic(wyndham)\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) and Pally(x) -> Genotypic(x))\nforall x (Genotypic(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Cragged(x) -> Pally(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) -> Pally(x))\nforall x (Eroded(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) and Genotypic(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Genotypic(x) and Skilled(x) -> Pally(x))\n\nnot Sees(wyndham, wyndham)\n\nnot Sees(wyndham, wyndham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The laurence is sharp. If someone is foliaceous then they are dormant. If someone is foliaceous and authorised then they are sharp. All sharp people are apart. Kind people are authorised. Young people are authorised. If someone is apart then they are foliaceous. All foliaceous, sharp people are dormant. If someone is sharp and foliaceous then they are authorised. The laurence likes the laurence.", "logic": "\nSharp(laurence)\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) -> Dormant(x))\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) and Authorised(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Apart(x))\nforall x (Dormant(x) -> Authorised(x))\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) -> Authorised(x))\nforall x (Apart(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) and Sharp(x) -> Dormant(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) and Foliaceous(x) -> Authorised(x))\n\nLikes(laurence, laurence)\n\nLikes(laurence, laurence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "The francois synthesise the marcela. The marcela does not eat the junina. The marcela outgo the elisa. The marcela is thracian. The marcela is unaerated. The marcela is foolish. The marcela synthesise the francois. The marcela does not like the junina. The marcela essay the junina. The marcela essay the elisa. The junina essay the marcela. The elisa is unaerated. The elisa is not antecedent. The elisa synthesise the junina. The elisa essay the francois. The elisa essay the marcela. If the francois synthesise the marcela and the francois does not eat the elisa then the francois synthesise the junina. If something synthesise the marcela and it essay the marcela then it is thracian. If something is thracian then it is unaerated. If the marcela essay the elisa and the marcela does not like the junina then the elisa outgo the marcela. If something is antecedent and it does not visit the junina then it essay the marcela. If something synthesise the marcela and the marcela synthesise the francois then the marcela does not eat the junina. If something essay the elisa and the elisa does not visit the francois then the elisa is unaerated. If something essay the junina and it essay the elisa then the junina synthesise the marcela. The elisa essay the marcela.", "logic": "\nSynthesise(francois, marcela)\nnot Outgo(marcela, junina)\nOutgo(marcela, elisa)\nThracian(marcela)\nUnaerated(marcela)\nFoolish(marcela)\nSynthesise(marcela, francois)\nnot Synthesise(marcela, junina)\nEssay(marcela, junina)\nEssay(marcela, elisa)\nEssay(junina, marcela)\nUnaerated(elisa)\nnot Antecedent(elisa)\nSynthesise(elisa, junina)\nEssay(elisa, francois)\nEssay(elisa, marcela)\nSynthesise(francois, marcela) and not Outgo(francois, elisa) -> Synthesise(francois, junina)\nforall x (Synthesise(x, marcela) and Essay(x, marcela) -> Thracian(x))\nforall x (Thracian(x) -> Unaerated(x))\nEssay(marcela, elisa) and not Synthesise(marcela, junina) -> Outgo(elisa, marcela)\nforall x (Antecedent(x) and not Essay(x, junina) -> Essay(x, marcela))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, marcela) and Synthesise(marcela, francois) -> not Outgo(marcela, junina))\nforall x (Essay(x, elisa) and not Essay(elisa, francois) -> Unaerated(elisa))\nforall x (Essay(x, junina) and Essay(x, elisa) -> Synthesise(junina, marcela))\n\nEssay(elisa, marcela)\n\ntherefore Essay(elisa, marcela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The flynn underline the fionna. The fionna does not eat the gladi. The fionna comminate the annamari. The fionna is regular. The fionna is algometric. The fionna is synonymous. The fionna underline the flynn. The fionna does not like the gladi. The fionna cinch the gladi. The fionna cinch the annamari. The gladi cinch the fionna. The annamari is algometric. The annamari is not meteoric. The annamari underline the gladi. The annamari cinch the flynn. The annamari cinch the fionna. If the flynn underline the fionna and the flynn does not eat the annamari then the flynn underline the gladi. If something underline the fionna and it cinch the fionna then it is regular. If something is regular then it is algometric. If the fionna cinch the annamari and the fionna does not like the gladi then the annamari comminate the fionna. If something is meteoric and it does not visit the gladi then it cinch the fionna. If something underline the fionna and the fionna underline the flynn then the fionna does not eat the gladi. If something cinch the annamari and the annamari does not visit the flynn then the annamari is algometric. If something cinch the gladi and it cinch the annamari then the gladi underline the fionna. The annamari does not visit the fionna.", "logic": "\nUnderline(flynn, fionna)\nnot Comminate(fionna, gladi)\nComminate(fionna, annamari)\nRegular(fionna)\nAlgometric(fionna)\nSynonymous(fionna)\nUnderline(fionna, flynn)\nnot Underline(fionna, gladi)\nCinch(fionna, gladi)\nCinch(fionna, annamari)\nCinch(gladi, fionna)\nAlgometric(annamari)\nnot Meteoric(annamari)\nUnderline(annamari, gladi)\nCinch(annamari, flynn)\nCinch(annamari, fionna)\nUnderline(flynn, fionna) and not Comminate(flynn, annamari) -> Underline(flynn, gladi)\nforall x (Underline(x, fionna) and Cinch(x, fionna) -> Regular(x))\nforall x (Regular(x) -> Algometric(x))\nCinch(fionna, annamari) and not Underline(fionna, gladi) -> Comminate(annamari, fionna)\nforall x (Meteoric(x) and not Cinch(x, gladi) -> Cinch(x, fionna))\nforall x (Underline(x, fionna) and Underline(fionna, flynn) -> not Comminate(fionna, gladi))\nforall x (Cinch(x, annamari) and not Cinch(annamari, flynn) -> Algometric(annamari))\nforall x (Cinch(x, gladi) and Cinch(x, annamari) -> Underline(gladi, fionna))\n\nnot Cinch(annamari, fionna)\n\ntherefore Cinch(annamari, fionna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The fortune babbitt the alanna. The alanna does not eat the dorice. The alanna antic the vasily. The alanna is murdered. The alanna is delectable. The alanna is hebridean. The alanna babbitt the fortune. The alanna does not like the dorice. The alanna swosh the dorice. The alanna swosh the vasily. The dorice swosh the alanna. The vasily is delectable. The vasily is not asquint. The vasily babbitt the dorice. The vasily swosh the fortune. The vasily swosh the alanna. If the fortune babbitt the alanna and the fortune does not eat the vasily then the fortune babbitt the dorice. If something babbitt the alanna and it swosh the alanna then it is murdered. If something is murdered then it is delectable. If the alanna swosh the vasily and the alanna does not like the dorice then the vasily antic the alanna. If something is asquint and it does not visit the dorice then it swosh the alanna. If something babbitt the alanna and the alanna babbitt the fortune then the alanna does not eat the dorice. If something swosh the vasily and the vasily does not visit the fortune then the vasily is delectable. If something swosh the dorice and it swosh the vasily then the dorice babbitt the alanna. The vasily antic the alanna.", "logic": "\nBabbitt(fortune, alanna)\nnot Antic(alanna, dorice)\nAntic(alanna, vasily)\nMurdered(alanna)\nDelectable(alanna)\nHebridean(alanna)\nBabbitt(alanna, fortune)\nnot Babbitt(alanna, dorice)\nSwosh(alanna, dorice)\nSwosh(alanna, vasily)\nSwosh(dorice, alanna)\nDelectable(vasily)\nnot Asquint(vasily)\nBabbitt(vasily, dorice)\nSwosh(vasily, fortune)\nSwosh(vasily, alanna)\nBabbitt(fortune, alanna) and not Antic(fortune, vasily) -> Babbitt(fortune, dorice)\nforall x (Babbitt(x, alanna) and Swosh(x, alanna) -> Murdered(x))\nforall x (Murdered(x) -> Delectable(x))\nSwosh(alanna, vasily) and not Babbitt(alanna, dorice) -> Antic(vasily, alanna)\nforall x (Asquint(x) and not Swosh(x, dorice) -> Swosh(x, alanna))\nforall x (Babbitt(x, alanna) and Babbitt(alanna, fortune) -> not Antic(alanna, dorice))\nforall x (Swosh(x, vasily) and not Swosh(vasily, fortune) -> Delectable(vasily))\nforall x (Swosh(x, dorice) and Swosh(x, vasily) -> Babbitt(dorice, alanna))\n\nAntic(vasily, alanna)\n\nSwosh(alanna, vasily) and not Babbitt(alanna, dorice) and Swosh(alanna, vasily) and not Babbitt(alanna, dorice) -> Antic(vasily, alanna) -> therefore Antic(vasily, alanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The fedora underline the jannelle. The jannelle does not eat the bentley. The jannelle asphyxiate the scottie. The jannelle is cannibalic. The jannelle is afghani. The jannelle is bizonal. The jannelle underline the fedora. The jannelle does not like the bentley. The jannelle literalize the bentley. The jannelle literalize the scottie. The bentley literalize the jannelle. The scottie is afghani. The scottie is not southerly. The scottie underline the bentley. The scottie literalize the fedora. The scottie literalize the jannelle. If the fedora underline the jannelle and the fedora does not eat the scottie then the fedora underline the bentley. If something underline the jannelle and it literalize the jannelle then it is cannibalic. If something is cannibalic then it is afghani. If the jannelle literalize the scottie and the jannelle does not like the bentley then the scottie asphyxiate the jannelle. If something is southerly and it does not visit the bentley then it literalize the jannelle. If something underline the jannelle and the jannelle underline the fedora then the jannelle does not eat the bentley. If something literalize the scottie and the scottie does not visit the fedora then the scottie is afghani. If something literalize the bentley and it literalize the scottie then the bentley underline the jannelle. The bentley does not like the jannelle.", "logic": "\nUnderline(fedora, jannelle)\nnot Asphyxiate(jannelle, bentley)\nAsphyxiate(jannelle, scottie)\nCannibalic(jannelle)\nAfghani(jannelle)\nBizonal(jannelle)\nUnderline(jannelle, fedora)\nnot Underline(jannelle, bentley)\nLiteralize(jannelle, bentley)\nLiteralize(jannelle, scottie)\nLiteralize(bentley, jannelle)\nAfghani(scottie)\nnot Southerly(scottie)\nUnderline(scottie, bentley)\nLiteralize(scottie, fedora)\nLiteralize(scottie, jannelle)\nUnderline(fedora, jannelle) and not Asphyxiate(fedora, scottie) -> Underline(fedora, bentley)\nforall x (Underline(x, jannelle) and Literalize(x, jannelle) -> Cannibalic(x))\nforall x (Cannibalic(x) -> Afghani(x))\nLiteralize(jannelle, scottie) and not Underline(jannelle, bentley) -> Asphyxiate(scottie, jannelle)\nforall x (Southerly(x) and not Literalize(x, bentley) -> Literalize(x, jannelle))\nforall x (Underline(x, jannelle) and Underline(jannelle, fedora) -> not Asphyxiate(jannelle, bentley))\nforall x (Literalize(x, scottie) and not Literalize(scottie, fedora) -> Afghani(scottie))\nforall x (Literalize(x, bentley) and Literalize(x, scottie) -> Underline(bentley, jannelle))\n\nnot Underline(bentley, jannelle)\n\nLiteralize(jannelle, bentley) and Literalize(jannelle, scottie) and forall x (Literalize(x, bentley) and Literalize(x, scottie) -> Underline(bentley, jannelle)) -> therefore Underline(bentley, jannelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The orelie caracole the fancie. The fancie does not eat the lucina. The fancie sabotage the ame. The fancie is xciv. The fancie is protanopic. The fancie is bigamous. The fancie caracole the orelie. The fancie does not like the lucina. The fancie smolder the lucina. The fancie smolder the ame. The lucina smolder the fancie. The ame is protanopic. The ame is not separable. The ame caracole the lucina. The ame smolder the orelie. The ame smolder the fancie. If the orelie caracole the fancie and the orelie does not eat the ame then the orelie caracole the lucina. If something caracole the fancie and it smolder the fancie then it is xciv. If something is xciv then it is protanopic. If the fancie smolder the ame and the fancie does not like the lucina then the ame sabotage the fancie. If something is separable and it does not visit the lucina then it smolder the fancie. If something caracole the fancie and the fancie caracole the orelie then the fancie does not eat the lucina. If something smolder the ame and the ame does not visit the orelie then the ame is protanopic. If something smolder the lucina and it smolder the ame then the lucina caracole the fancie. The lucina is xciv.", "logic": "\nCaracole(orelie, fancie)\nnot Sabotage(fancie, lucina)\nSabotage(fancie, ame)\nXciv(fancie)\nProtanopic(fancie)\nBigamous(fancie)\nCaracole(fancie, orelie)\nnot Caracole(fancie, lucina)\nSmolder(fancie, lucina)\nSmolder(fancie, ame)\nSmolder(lucina, fancie)\nProtanopic(ame)\nnot Separable(ame)\nCaracole(ame, lucina)\nSmolder(ame, orelie)\nSmolder(ame, fancie)\nCaracole(orelie, fancie) and not Sabotage(orelie, ame) -> Caracole(orelie, lucina)\nforall x (Caracole(x, fancie) and Smolder(x, fancie) -> Xciv(x))\nforall x (Xciv(x) -> Protanopic(x))\nSmolder(fancie, ame) and not Caracole(fancie, lucina) -> Sabotage(ame, fancie)\nforall x (Separable(x) and not Smolder(x, lucina) -> Smolder(x, fancie))\nforall x (Caracole(x, fancie) and Caracole(fancie, orelie) -> not Sabotage(fancie, lucina))\nforall x (Smolder(x, ame) and not Smolder(ame, orelie) -> Protanopic(ame))\nforall x (Smolder(x, lucina) and Smolder(x, ame) -> Caracole(lucina, fancie))\n\nXciv(lucina)\n\nSmolder(fancie, lucina) and Smolder(fancie, ame) and forall x (Smolder(x, lucina) and Smolder(x, ame) -> Caracole(lucina, fancie)) -> therefore Caracole(lucina, fancie) Caracole(lucina, fancie) and Smolder(lucina, fancie) and forall x (Caracole(x, fancie) and Smolder(x, fancie) -> Xciv(x)) -> therefore Xciv(lucina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The enriqueta boondoggle the jess. The jess does not eat the gardener. The jess damage the shelly. The jess is dominating. The jess is bulbar. The jess is umpteen. The jess boondoggle the enriqueta. The jess does not like the gardener. The jess deprave the gardener. The jess deprave the shelly. The gardener deprave the jess. The shelly is bulbar. The shelly is not bounded. The shelly boondoggle the gardener. The shelly deprave the enriqueta. The shelly deprave the jess. If the enriqueta boondoggle the jess and the enriqueta does not eat the shelly then the enriqueta boondoggle the gardener. If something boondoggle the jess and it deprave the jess then it is dominating. If something is dominating then it is bulbar. If the jess deprave the shelly and the jess does not like the gardener then the shelly damage the jess. If something is bounded and it does not visit the gardener then it deprave the jess. If something boondoggle the jess and the jess boondoggle the enriqueta then the jess does not eat the gardener. If something deprave the shelly and the shelly does not visit the enriqueta then the shelly is bulbar. If something deprave the gardener and it deprave the shelly then the gardener boondoggle the jess. The gardener is not dominating.", "logic": "\nBoondoggle(enriqueta, jess)\nnot Damage(jess, gardener)\nDamage(jess, shelly)\nDominating(jess)\nBulbar(jess)\nUmpteen(jess)\nBoondoggle(jess, enriqueta)\nnot Boondoggle(jess, gardener)\nDeprave(jess, gardener)\nDeprave(jess, shelly)\nDeprave(gardener, jess)\nBulbar(shelly)\nnot Bounded(shelly)\nBoondoggle(shelly, gardener)\nDeprave(shelly, enriqueta)\nDeprave(shelly, jess)\nBoondoggle(enriqueta, jess) and not Damage(enriqueta, shelly) -> Boondoggle(enriqueta, gardener)\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, jess) and Deprave(x, jess) -> Dominating(x))\nforall x (Dominating(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nDeprave(jess, shelly) and not Boondoggle(jess, gardener) -> Damage(shelly, jess)\nforall x (Bounded(x) and not Deprave(x, gardener) -> Deprave(x, jess))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, jess) and Boondoggle(jess, enriqueta) -> not Damage(jess, gardener))\nforall x (Deprave(x, shelly) and not Deprave(shelly, enriqueta) -> Bulbar(shelly))\nforall x (Deprave(x, gardener) and Deprave(x, shelly) -> Boondoggle(gardener, jess))\n\nnot Dominating(gardener)\n\nDeprave(jess, gardener) and Deprave(jess, shelly) and forall x (Deprave(x, gardener) and Deprave(x, shelly) -> Boondoggle(gardener, jess)) -> therefore Boondoggle(gardener, jess) Boondoggle(gardener, jess) and Deprave(gardener, jess) and forall x (Boondoggle(x, jess) and Deprave(x, jess) -> Dominating(x)) -> therefore Dominating(gardener)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The gilburt salute the nettie. The nettie does not eat the felicia. The nettie prologuize the aurelie. The nettie is cubical. The nettie is capped. The nettie is acquired. The nettie salute the gilburt. The nettie does not like the felicia. The nettie initialize the felicia. The nettie initialize the aurelie. The felicia initialize the nettie. The aurelie is capped. The aurelie is not itchy. The aurelie salute the felicia. The aurelie initialize the gilburt. The aurelie initialize the nettie. If the gilburt salute the nettie and the gilburt does not eat the aurelie then the gilburt salute the felicia. If something salute the nettie and it initialize the nettie then it is cubical. If something is cubical then it is capped. If the nettie initialize the aurelie and the nettie does not like the felicia then the aurelie prologuize the nettie. If something is itchy and it does not visit the felicia then it initialize the nettie. If something salute the nettie and the nettie salute the gilburt then the nettie does not eat the felicia. If something initialize the aurelie and the aurelie does not visit the gilburt then the aurelie is capped. If something initialize the felicia and it initialize the aurelie then the felicia salute the nettie. The felicia is capped.", "logic": "\nSalute(gilburt, nettie)\nnot Prologuize(nettie, felicia)\nProloguize(nettie, aurelie)\nCubical(nettie)\nCapped(nettie)\nAcquired(nettie)\nSalute(nettie, gilburt)\nnot Salute(nettie, felicia)\nInitialize(nettie, felicia)\nInitialize(nettie, aurelie)\nInitialize(felicia, nettie)\nCapped(aurelie)\nnot Itchy(aurelie)\nSalute(aurelie, felicia)\nInitialize(aurelie, gilburt)\nInitialize(aurelie, nettie)\nSalute(gilburt, nettie) and not Prologuize(gilburt, aurelie) -> Salute(gilburt, felicia)\nforall x (Salute(x, nettie) and Initialize(x, nettie) -> Cubical(x))\nforall x (Cubical(x) -> Capped(x))\nInitialize(nettie, aurelie) and not Salute(nettie, felicia) -> Prologuize(aurelie, nettie)\nforall x (Itchy(x) and not Initialize(x, felicia) -> Initialize(x, nettie))\nforall x (Salute(x, nettie) and Salute(nettie, gilburt) -> not Prologuize(nettie, felicia))\nforall x (Initialize(x, aurelie) and not Initialize(aurelie, gilburt) -> Capped(aurelie))\nforall x (Initialize(x, felicia) and Initialize(x, aurelie) -> Salute(felicia, nettie))\n\nCapped(felicia)\n\nInitialize(nettie, felicia) and Initialize(nettie, aurelie) and forall x (Initialize(x, felicia) and Initialize(x, aurelie) -> Salute(felicia, nettie)) -> therefore Salute(felicia, nettie) Salute(felicia, nettie) and Initialize(felicia, nettie) and forall x (Salute(x, nettie) and Initialize(x, nettie) -> Cubical(x)) -> therefore Cubical(felicia) Cubical(felicia) and forall x (Cubical(x) -> Capped(x)) -> therefore Capped(felicia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The bayard sledge the merissa. The merissa does not eat the katherine. The merissa tally the juan. The merissa is salient. The merissa is teeny. The merissa is aphotic. The merissa sledge the bayard. The merissa does not like the katherine. The merissa etherise the katherine. The merissa etherise the juan. The katherine etherise the merissa. The juan is teeny. The juan is not overhanded. The juan sledge the katherine. The juan etherise the bayard. The juan etherise the merissa. If the bayard sledge the merissa and the bayard does not eat the juan then the bayard sledge the katherine. If something sledge the merissa and it etherise the merissa then it is salient. If something is salient then it is teeny. If the merissa etherise the juan and the merissa does not like the katherine then the juan tally the merissa. If something is overhanded and it does not visit the katherine then it etherise the merissa. If something sledge the merissa and the merissa sledge the bayard then the merissa does not eat the katherine. If something etherise the juan and the juan does not visit the bayard then the juan is teeny. If something etherise the katherine and it etherise the juan then the katherine sledge the merissa. The katherine is not teeny.", "logic": "\nSledge(bayard, merissa)\nnot Tally(merissa, katherine)\nTally(merissa, juan)\nSalient(merissa)\nTeeny(merissa)\nAphotic(merissa)\nSledge(merissa, bayard)\nnot Sledge(merissa, katherine)\nEtherise(merissa, katherine)\nEtherise(merissa, juan)\nEtherise(katherine, merissa)\nTeeny(juan)\nnot Overhanded(juan)\nSledge(juan, katherine)\nEtherise(juan, bayard)\nEtherise(juan, merissa)\nSledge(bayard, merissa) and not Tally(bayard, juan) -> Sledge(bayard, katherine)\nforall x (Sledge(x, merissa) and Etherise(x, merissa) -> Salient(x))\nforall x (Salient(x) -> Teeny(x))\nEtherise(merissa, juan) and not Sledge(merissa, katherine) -> Tally(juan, merissa)\nforall x (Overhanded(x) and not Etherise(x, katherine) -> Etherise(x, merissa))\nforall x (Sledge(x, merissa) and Sledge(merissa, bayard) -> not Tally(merissa, katherine))\nforall x (Etherise(x, juan) and not Etherise(juan, bayard) -> Teeny(juan))\nforall x (Etherise(x, katherine) and Etherise(x, juan) -> Sledge(katherine, merissa))\n\nnot Teeny(katherine)\n\nEtherise(merissa, katherine) and Etherise(merissa, juan) and forall x (Etherise(x, katherine) and Etherise(x, juan) -> Sledge(katherine, merissa)) -> therefore Sledge(katherine, merissa) Sledge(katherine, merissa) and Etherise(katherine, merissa) and forall x (Sledge(x, merissa) and Etherise(x, merissa) -> Salient(x)) -> therefore Salient(katherine) Salient(katherine) and forall x (Salient(x) -> Teeny(x)) -> therefore Teeny(katherine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The hermina chin the torin. The torin does not eat the martha. The torin boost the bea. The torin is serbian. The torin is sparse. The torin is explicit. The torin chin the hermina. The torin does not like the martha. The torin seed the martha. The torin seed the bea. The martha seed the torin. The bea is sparse. The bea is not jesting. The bea chin the martha. The bea seed the hermina. The bea seed the torin. If the hermina chin the torin and the hermina does not eat the bea then the hermina chin the martha. If something chin the torin and it seed the torin then it is serbian. If something is serbian then it is sparse. If the torin seed the bea and the torin does not like the martha then the bea boost the torin. If something is jesting and it does not visit the martha then it seed the torin. If something chin the torin and the torin chin the hermina then the torin does not eat the martha. If something seed the bea and the bea does not visit the hermina then the bea is sparse. If something seed the martha and it seed the bea then the martha chin the torin. The hermina is not sparse.", "logic": "\nChin(hermina, torin)\nnot Boost(torin, martha)\nBoost(torin, bea)\nSerbian(torin)\nSparse(torin)\nExplicit(torin)\nChin(torin, hermina)\nnot Chin(torin, martha)\nSeed(torin, martha)\nSeed(torin, bea)\nSeed(martha, torin)\nSparse(bea)\nnot Jesting(bea)\nChin(bea, martha)\nSeed(bea, hermina)\nSeed(bea, torin)\nChin(hermina, torin) and not Boost(hermina, bea) -> Chin(hermina, martha)\nforall x (Chin(x, torin) and Seed(x, torin) -> Serbian(x))\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Sparse(x))\nSeed(torin, bea) and not Chin(torin, martha) -> Boost(bea, torin)\nforall x (Jesting(x) and not Seed(x, martha) -> Seed(x, torin))\nforall x (Chin(x, torin) and Chin(torin, hermina) -> not Boost(torin, martha))\nforall x (Seed(x, bea) and not Seed(bea, hermina) -> Sparse(bea))\nforall x (Seed(x, martha) and Seed(x, bea) -> Chin(martha, torin))\n\nnot Sparse(hermina)\n\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Sparse(x)) <- forall x (Chin(x, torin) and Seed(x, torin) -> Serbian(x)) <- forall x (Jesting(x) and not Seed(x, martha) -> Seed(x, torin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The paige renegade the teryl. The teryl does not eat the joseph. The teryl rosin the francisca. The teryl is bigheaded. The teryl is anabatic. The teryl is costly. The teryl renegade the paige. The teryl does not like the joseph. The teryl buffet the joseph. The teryl buffet the francisca. The joseph buffet the teryl. The francisca is anabatic. The francisca is not gonadal. The francisca renegade the joseph. The francisca buffet the paige. The francisca buffet the teryl. If the paige renegade the teryl and the paige does not eat the francisca then the paige renegade the joseph. If something renegade the teryl and it buffet the teryl then it is bigheaded. If something is bigheaded then it is anabatic. If the teryl buffet the francisca and the teryl does not like the joseph then the francisca rosin the teryl. If something is gonadal and it does not visit the joseph then it buffet the teryl. If something renegade the teryl and the teryl renegade the paige then the teryl does not eat the joseph. If something buffet the francisca and the francisca does not visit the paige then the francisca is anabatic. If something buffet the joseph and it buffet the francisca then the joseph renegade the teryl. The paige buffet the teryl.", "logic": "\nRenegade(paige, teryl)\nnot Rosin(teryl, joseph)\nRosin(teryl, francisca)\nBigheaded(teryl)\nAnabatic(teryl)\nCostly(teryl)\nRenegade(teryl, paige)\nnot Renegade(teryl, joseph)\nBuffet(teryl, joseph)\nBuffet(teryl, francisca)\nBuffet(joseph, teryl)\nAnabatic(francisca)\nnot Gonadal(francisca)\nRenegade(francisca, joseph)\nBuffet(francisca, paige)\nBuffet(francisca, teryl)\nRenegade(paige, teryl) and not Rosin(paige, francisca) -> Renegade(paige, joseph)\nforall x (Renegade(x, teryl) and Buffet(x, teryl) -> Bigheaded(x))\nforall x (Bigheaded(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nBuffet(teryl, francisca) and not Renegade(teryl, joseph) -> Rosin(francisca, teryl)\nforall x (Gonadal(x) and not Buffet(x, joseph) -> Buffet(x, teryl))\nforall x (Renegade(x, teryl) and Renegade(teryl, paige) -> not Rosin(teryl, joseph))\nforall x (Buffet(x, francisca) and not Buffet(francisca, paige) -> Anabatic(francisca))\nforall x (Buffet(x, joseph) and Buffet(x, francisca) -> Renegade(joseph, teryl))\n\nBuffet(paige, teryl)\n\nforall x (Gonadal(x) and not Buffet(x, joseph) -> Buffet(x, teryl)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The malynda dropkick the noell. The noell does not eat the cherianne. The noell decoct the aldwin. The noell is androgenic. The noell is volant. The noell is undesiring. The noell dropkick the malynda. The noell does not like the cherianne. The noell disesteem the cherianne. The noell disesteem the aldwin. The cherianne disesteem the noell. The aldwin is volant. The aldwin is not jumbo. The aldwin dropkick the cherianne. The aldwin disesteem the malynda. The aldwin disesteem the noell. If the malynda dropkick the noell and the malynda does not eat the aldwin then the malynda dropkick the cherianne. If something dropkick the noell and it disesteem the noell then it is androgenic. If something is androgenic then it is volant. If the noell disesteem the aldwin and the noell does not like the cherianne then the aldwin decoct the noell. If something is jumbo and it does not visit the cherianne then it disesteem the noell. If something dropkick the noell and the noell dropkick the malynda then the noell does not eat the cherianne. If something disesteem the aldwin and the aldwin does not visit the malynda then the aldwin is volant. If something disesteem the cherianne and it disesteem the aldwin then the cherianne dropkick the noell. The malynda does not like the cherianne.", "logic": "\nDropkick(malynda, noell)\nnot Decoct(noell, cherianne)\nDecoct(noell, aldwin)\nAndrogenic(noell)\nVolant(noell)\nUndesiring(noell)\nDropkick(noell, malynda)\nnot Dropkick(noell, cherianne)\nDisesteem(noell, cherianne)\nDisesteem(noell, aldwin)\nDisesteem(cherianne, noell)\nVolant(aldwin)\nnot Jumbo(aldwin)\nDropkick(aldwin, cherianne)\nDisesteem(aldwin, malynda)\nDisesteem(aldwin, noell)\nDropkick(malynda, noell) and not Decoct(malynda, aldwin) -> Dropkick(malynda, cherianne)\nforall x (Dropkick(x, noell) and Disesteem(x, noell) -> Androgenic(x))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) -> Volant(x))\nDisesteem(noell, aldwin) and not Dropkick(noell, cherianne) -> Decoct(aldwin, noell)\nforall x (Jumbo(x) and not Disesteem(x, cherianne) -> Disesteem(x, noell))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, noell) and Dropkick(noell, malynda) -> not Decoct(noell, cherianne))\nforall x (Disesteem(x, aldwin) and not Disesteem(aldwin, malynda) -> Volant(aldwin))\nforall x (Disesteem(x, cherianne) and Disesteem(x, aldwin) -> Dropkick(cherianne, noell))\n\nnot Dropkick(malynda, cherianne)\n\nDropkick(malynda, noell) and not Decoct(malynda, aldwin) -> Dropkick(malynda, cherianne) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The cordy sing the izzy. The izzy does not eat the sandy. The izzy ablactate the marjorie. The izzy is euphonic. The izzy is oleophilic. The izzy is mucose. The izzy sing the cordy. The izzy does not like the sandy. The izzy miscast the sandy. The izzy miscast the marjorie. The sandy miscast the izzy. The marjorie is oleophilic. The marjorie is not skimpy. The marjorie sing the sandy. The marjorie miscast the cordy. The marjorie miscast the izzy. If the cordy sing the izzy and the cordy does not eat the marjorie then the cordy sing the sandy. If something sing the izzy and it miscast the izzy then it is euphonic. If something is euphonic then it is oleophilic. If the izzy miscast the marjorie and the izzy does not like the sandy then the marjorie ablactate the izzy. If something is skimpy and it does not visit the sandy then it miscast the izzy. If something sing the izzy and the izzy sing the cordy then the izzy does not eat the sandy. If something miscast the marjorie and the marjorie does not visit the cordy then the marjorie is oleophilic. If something miscast the sandy and it miscast the marjorie then the sandy sing the izzy. The marjorie is euphonic.", "logic": "\nSing(cordy, izzy)\nnot Ablactate(izzy, sandy)\nAblactate(izzy, marjorie)\nEuphonic(izzy)\nOleophilic(izzy)\nMucose(izzy)\nSing(izzy, cordy)\nnot Sing(izzy, sandy)\nMiscast(izzy, sandy)\nMiscast(izzy, marjorie)\nMiscast(sandy, izzy)\nOleophilic(marjorie)\nnot Skimpy(marjorie)\nSing(marjorie, sandy)\nMiscast(marjorie, cordy)\nMiscast(marjorie, izzy)\nSing(cordy, izzy) and not Ablactate(cordy, marjorie) -> Sing(cordy, sandy)\nforall x (Sing(x, izzy) and Miscast(x, izzy) -> Euphonic(x))\nforall x (Euphonic(x) -> Oleophilic(x))\nMiscast(izzy, marjorie) and not Sing(izzy, sandy) -> Ablactate(marjorie, izzy)\nforall x (Skimpy(x) and not Miscast(x, sandy) -> Miscast(x, izzy))\nforall x (Sing(x, izzy) and Sing(izzy, cordy) -> not Ablactate(izzy, sandy))\nforall x (Miscast(x, marjorie) and not Miscast(marjorie, cordy) -> Oleophilic(marjorie))\nforall x (Miscast(x, sandy) and Miscast(x, marjorie) -> Sing(sandy, izzy))\n\nEuphonic(marjorie)\n\nforall x (Sing(x, izzy) and Miscast(x, izzy) -> Euphonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The nance shudder the wain. The wain does not eat the trudi. The wain annunciate the dorelle. The wain is coexisting. The wain is contracted. The wain is lovely. The wain shudder the nance. The wain does not like the trudi. The wain outgrow the trudi. The wain outgrow the dorelle. The trudi outgrow the wain. The dorelle is contracted. The dorelle is not bland. The dorelle shudder the trudi. The dorelle outgrow the nance. The dorelle outgrow the wain. If the nance shudder the wain and the nance does not eat the dorelle then the nance shudder the trudi. If something shudder the wain and it outgrow the wain then it is coexisting. If something is coexisting then it is contracted. If the wain outgrow the dorelle and the wain does not like the trudi then the dorelle annunciate the wain. If something is bland and it does not visit the trudi then it outgrow the wain. If something shudder the wain and the wain shudder the nance then the wain does not eat the trudi. If something outgrow the dorelle and the dorelle does not visit the nance then the dorelle is contracted. If something outgrow the trudi and it outgrow the dorelle then the trudi shudder the wain. The wain does not eat the nance.", "logic": "\nShudder(nance, wain)\nnot Annunciate(wain, trudi)\nAnnunciate(wain, dorelle)\nCoexisting(wain)\nContracted(wain)\nLovely(wain)\nShudder(wain, nance)\nnot Shudder(wain, trudi)\nOutgrow(wain, trudi)\nOutgrow(wain, dorelle)\nOutgrow(trudi, wain)\nContracted(dorelle)\nnot Bland(dorelle)\nShudder(dorelle, trudi)\nOutgrow(dorelle, nance)\nOutgrow(dorelle, wain)\nShudder(nance, wain) and not Annunciate(nance, dorelle) -> Shudder(nance, trudi)\nforall x (Shudder(x, wain) and Outgrow(x, wain) -> Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) -> Contracted(x))\nOutgrow(wain, dorelle) and not Shudder(wain, trudi) -> Annunciate(dorelle, wain)\nforall x (Bland(x) and not Outgrow(x, trudi) -> Outgrow(x, wain))\nforall x (Shudder(x, wain) and Shudder(wain, nance) -> not Annunciate(wain, trudi))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, dorelle) and not Outgrow(dorelle, nance) -> Contracted(dorelle))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, trudi) and Outgrow(x, dorelle) -> Shudder(trudi, wain))\n\nnot Annunciate(wain, nance)\n\nnot Annunciate(wain, nance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The kimmie premier the nessa. The nessa does not eat the morganica. The nessa bloody the terrye. The nessa is infantile. The nessa is autarchic. The nessa is bahai. The nessa premier the kimmie. The nessa does not like the morganica. The nessa sober the morganica. The nessa sober the terrye. The morganica sober the nessa. The terrye is autarchic. The terrye is not eighty. The terrye premier the morganica. The terrye sober the kimmie. The terrye sober the nessa. If the kimmie premier the nessa and the kimmie does not eat the terrye then the kimmie premier the morganica. If something premier the nessa and it sober the nessa then it is infantile. If something is infantile then it is autarchic. If the nessa sober the terrye and the nessa does not like the morganica then the terrye bloody the nessa. If something is eighty and it does not visit the morganica then it sober the nessa. If something premier the nessa and the nessa premier the kimmie then the nessa does not eat the morganica. If something sober the terrye and the terrye does not visit the kimmie then the terrye is autarchic. If something sober the morganica and it sober the terrye then the morganica premier the nessa. The kimmie bloody the nessa.", "logic": "\nPremier(kimmie, nessa)\nnot Bloody(nessa, morganica)\nBloody(nessa, terrye)\nInfantile(nessa)\nAutarchic(nessa)\nBahai(nessa)\nPremier(nessa, kimmie)\nnot Premier(nessa, morganica)\nSober(nessa, morganica)\nSober(nessa, terrye)\nSober(morganica, nessa)\nAutarchic(terrye)\nnot Eighty(terrye)\nPremier(terrye, morganica)\nSober(terrye, kimmie)\nSober(terrye, nessa)\nPremier(kimmie, nessa) and not Bloody(kimmie, terrye) -> Premier(kimmie, morganica)\nforall x (Premier(x, nessa) and Sober(x, nessa) -> Infantile(x))\nforall x (Infantile(x) -> Autarchic(x))\nSober(nessa, terrye) and not Premier(nessa, morganica) -> Bloody(terrye, nessa)\nforall x (Eighty(x) and not Sober(x, morganica) -> Sober(x, nessa))\nforall x (Premier(x, nessa) and Premier(nessa, kimmie) -> not Bloody(nessa, morganica))\nforall x (Sober(x, terrye) and not Sober(terrye, kimmie) -> Autarchic(terrye))\nforall x (Sober(x, morganica) and Sober(x, terrye) -> Premier(morganica, nessa))\n\nBloody(kimmie, nessa)\n\nBloody(kimmie, nessa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The oralle tally the ruth. The ruth does not eat the ellene. The ruth extrude the waverley. The ruth is maxi. The ruth is nonsense. The ruth is stinky. The ruth tally the oralle. The ruth does not like the ellene. The ruth butt the ellene. The ruth butt the waverley. The ellene butt the ruth. The waverley is nonsense. The waverley is not damned. The waverley tally the ellene. The waverley butt the oralle. The waverley butt the ruth. If the oralle tally the ruth and the oralle does not eat the waverley then the oralle tally the ellene. If something tally the ruth and it butt the ruth then it is maxi. If something is maxi then it is nonsense. If the ruth butt the waverley and the ruth does not like the ellene then the waverley extrude the ruth. If something is damned and it does not visit the ellene then it butt the ruth. If something tally the ruth and the ruth tally the oralle then the ruth does not eat the ellene. If something butt the waverley and the waverley does not visit the oralle then the waverley is nonsense. If something butt the ellene and it butt the waverley then the ellene tally the ruth. The waverley does not eat the ellene.", "logic": "\nTally(oralle, ruth)\nnot Extrude(ruth, ellene)\nExtrude(ruth, waverley)\nMaxi(ruth)\nNonsense(ruth)\nStinky(ruth)\nTally(ruth, oralle)\nnot Tally(ruth, ellene)\nButt(ruth, ellene)\nButt(ruth, waverley)\nButt(ellene, ruth)\nNonsense(waverley)\nnot Damned(waverley)\nTally(waverley, ellene)\nButt(waverley, oralle)\nButt(waverley, ruth)\nTally(oralle, ruth) and not Extrude(oralle, waverley) -> Tally(oralle, ellene)\nforall x (Tally(x, ruth) and Butt(x, ruth) -> Maxi(x))\nforall x (Maxi(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nButt(ruth, waverley) and not Tally(ruth, ellene) -> Extrude(waverley, ruth)\nforall x (Damned(x) and not Butt(x, ellene) -> Butt(x, ruth))\nforall x (Tally(x, ruth) and Tally(ruth, oralle) -> not Extrude(ruth, ellene))\nforall x (Butt(x, waverley) and not Butt(waverley, oralle) -> Nonsense(waverley))\nforall x (Butt(x, ellene) and Butt(x, waverley) -> Tally(ellene, ruth))\n\nnot Extrude(waverley, ellene)\n\nnot Extrude(waverley, ellene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The davida unleash the debera. The debera does not eat the brandais. The debera benefit the alyson. The debera is recursive. The debera is dyslexic. The debera is kafkaesque. The debera unleash the davida. The debera does not like the brandais. The debera perturb the brandais. The debera perturb the alyson. The brandais perturb the debera. The alyson is dyslexic. The alyson is not epidural. The alyson unleash the brandais. The alyson perturb the davida. The alyson perturb the debera. If the davida unleash the debera and the davida does not eat the alyson then the davida unleash the brandais. If something unleash the debera and it perturb the debera then it is recursive. If something is recursive then it is dyslexic. If the debera perturb the alyson and the debera does not like the brandais then the alyson benefit the debera. If something is epidural and it does not visit the brandais then it perturb the debera. If something unleash the debera and the debera unleash the davida then the debera does not eat the brandais. If something perturb the alyson and the alyson does not visit the davida then the alyson is dyslexic. If something perturb the brandais and it perturb the alyson then the brandais unleash the debera. The davida is nice.", "logic": "\nUnleash(davida, debera)\nnot Benefit(debera, brandais)\nBenefit(debera, alyson)\nRecursive(debera)\nDyslexic(debera)\nKafkaesque(debera)\nUnleash(debera, davida)\nnot Unleash(debera, brandais)\nPerturb(debera, brandais)\nPerturb(debera, alyson)\nPerturb(brandais, debera)\nDyslexic(alyson)\nnot Epidural(alyson)\nUnleash(alyson, brandais)\nPerturb(alyson, davida)\nPerturb(alyson, debera)\nUnleash(davida, debera) and not Benefit(davida, alyson) -> Unleash(davida, brandais)\nforall x (Unleash(x, debera) and Perturb(x, debera) -> Recursive(x))\nforall x (Recursive(x) -> Dyslexic(x))\nPerturb(debera, alyson) and not Unleash(debera, brandais) -> Benefit(alyson, debera)\nforall x (Epidural(x) and not Perturb(x, brandais) -> Perturb(x, debera))\nforall x (Unleash(x, debera) and Unleash(debera, davida) -> not Benefit(debera, brandais))\nforall x (Perturb(x, alyson) and not Perturb(alyson, davida) -> Dyslexic(alyson))\nforall x (Perturb(x, brandais) and Perturb(x, alyson) -> Unleash(brandais, debera))\n\nNice(davida)\n\nNice(davida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Kellsie is malawian. Kellsie is separable. Kellsie is corneous. Kellsie is not loverlike. Friedric is malawian. Bogdan is malawian. Bogdan is murky. Bogdan is masonic. Bogdan is separable. Bogdan is not corneous. Bogdan is not loverlike. Bogdan is burked. Bell is malawian. Bell is murky. Bell is masonic. Bell is burked. All burked people are masonic. Red, malawian people are masonic. All masonic people are separable. If someone is burked and not murky then they are not separable. If Friedric is malawian then Friedric is burked. If Friedric is separable and Friedric is not masonic then Friedric is not corneous. If someone is separable and not burked then they are corneous. Furry, loverlike people are not corneous. Bogdan is masonic.", "logic": "\nMalawian(kellsie)\nSeparable(kellsie)\nCorneous(kellsie)\nnot Loverlike(kellsie)\nMalawian(friedric)\nMalawian(bogdan)\nMurky(bogdan)\nMasonic(bogdan)\nSeparable(bogdan)\nnot Corneous(bogdan)\nnot Loverlike(bogdan)\nBurked(bogdan)\nMalawian(bell)\nMurky(bell)\nMasonic(bell)\nBurked(bell)\nforall x (Burked(x) -> Masonic(x))\nforall x (Separable(x) and Malawian(x) -> Masonic(x))\nforall x (Masonic(x) -> Separable(x))\nforall x (Burked(x) and not Murky(x) -> not Separable(x))\nMalawian(friedric) -> Burked(friedric)\nSeparable(friedric) and not Masonic(friedric) -> not Corneous(friedric)\nforall x (Separable(x) and not Burked(x) -> Corneous(x))\nforall x (Masonic(x) and Loverlike(x) -> not Corneous(x))\n\nMasonic(bogdan)\n\ntherefore Masonic(bogdan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Delbert is monkish. Delbert is imbricated. Delbert is shifting. Delbert is not apophatic. Wayne is monkish. Carmela is monkish. Carmela is upcurved. Carmela is dashed. Carmela is imbricated. Carmela is not shifting. Carmela is not apophatic. Carmela is unoiled. Michel is monkish. Michel is upcurved. Michel is dashed. Michel is unoiled. All unoiled people are dashed. Red, monkish people are dashed. All dashed people are imbricated. If someone is unoiled and not upcurved then they are not imbricated. If Wayne is monkish then Wayne is unoiled. If Wayne is imbricated and Wayne is not dashed then Wayne is not shifting. If someone is imbricated and not unoiled then they are shifting. Furry, apophatic people are not shifting. Carmela is not monkish.", "logic": "\nMonkish(delbert)\nImbricated(delbert)\nShifting(delbert)\nnot Apophatic(delbert)\nMonkish(wayne)\nMonkish(carmela)\nUpcurved(carmela)\nDashed(carmela)\nImbricated(carmela)\nnot Shifting(carmela)\nnot Apophatic(carmela)\nUnoiled(carmela)\nMonkish(michel)\nUpcurved(michel)\nDashed(michel)\nUnoiled(michel)\nforall x (Unoiled(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Imbricated(x) and Monkish(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) -> Imbricated(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) and not Upcurved(x) -> not Imbricated(x))\nMonkish(wayne) -> Unoiled(wayne)\nImbricated(wayne) and not Dashed(wayne) -> not Shifting(wayne)\nforall x (Imbricated(x) and not Unoiled(x) -> Shifting(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) and Apophatic(x) -> not Shifting(x))\n\nnot Monkish(carmela)\n\ntherefore Monkish(carmela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Caldwell is calvinist. Caldwell is ungenerous. Caldwell is skilled. Caldwell is not ribbonlike. Carlina is calvinist. Shanie is calvinist. Shanie is unwelcome. Shanie is allomerous. Shanie is ungenerous. Shanie is not skilled. Shanie is not ribbonlike. Shanie is inner. Goldina is calvinist. Goldina is unwelcome. Goldina is allomerous. Goldina is inner. All inner people are allomerous. Red, calvinist people are allomerous. All allomerous people are ungenerous. If someone is inner and not unwelcome then they are not ungenerous. If Carlina is calvinist then Carlina is inner. If Carlina is ungenerous and Carlina is not allomerous then Carlina is not skilled. If someone is ungenerous and not inner then they are skilled. Furry, ribbonlike people are not skilled. Caldwell is allomerous.", "logic": "\nCalvinist(caldwell)\nUngenerous(caldwell)\nSkilled(caldwell)\nnot Ribbonlike(caldwell)\nCalvinist(carlina)\nCalvinist(shanie)\nUnwelcome(shanie)\nAllomerous(shanie)\nUngenerous(shanie)\nnot Skilled(shanie)\nnot Ribbonlike(shanie)\nInner(shanie)\nCalvinist(goldina)\nUnwelcome(goldina)\nAllomerous(goldina)\nInner(goldina)\nforall x (Inner(x) -> Allomerous(x))\nforall x (Ungenerous(x) and Calvinist(x) -> Allomerous(x))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) -> Ungenerous(x))\nforall x (Inner(x) and not Unwelcome(x) -> not Ungenerous(x))\nCalvinist(carlina) -> Inner(carlina)\nUngenerous(carlina) and not Allomerous(carlina) -> not Skilled(carlina)\nforall x (Ungenerous(x) and not Inner(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) and Ribbonlike(x) -> not Skilled(x))\n\nAllomerous(caldwell)\n\nUngenerous(caldwell) and Calvinist(caldwell) and forall x (Ungenerous(x) and Calvinist(x) -> Allomerous(x)) -> therefore Allomerous(caldwell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Merv is minoan. Merv is salivary. Merv is leaved. Merv is not fourpenny. Rebbecca is minoan. Raimund is minoan. Raimund is formalised. Raimund is acheronian. Raimund is salivary. Raimund is not leaved. Raimund is not fourpenny. Raimund is numinous. Lemar is minoan. Lemar is formalised. Lemar is acheronian. Lemar is numinous. All numinous people are acheronian. Red, minoan people are acheronian. All acheronian people are salivary. If someone is numinous and not formalised then they are not salivary. If Rebbecca is minoan then Rebbecca is numinous. If Rebbecca is salivary and Rebbecca is not acheronian then Rebbecca is not leaved. If someone is salivary and not numinous then they are leaved. Furry, fourpenny people are not leaved. Merv is not acheronian.", "logic": "\nMinoan(merv)\nSalivary(merv)\nLeaved(merv)\nnot Fourpenny(merv)\nMinoan(rebbecca)\nMinoan(raimund)\nFormalised(raimund)\nAcheronian(raimund)\nSalivary(raimund)\nnot Leaved(raimund)\nnot Fourpenny(raimund)\nNuminous(raimund)\nMinoan(lemar)\nFormalised(lemar)\nAcheronian(lemar)\nNuminous(lemar)\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> Acheronian(x))\nforall x (Salivary(x) and Minoan(x) -> Acheronian(x))\nforall x (Acheronian(x) -> Salivary(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) and not Formalised(x) -> not Salivary(x))\nMinoan(rebbecca) -> Numinous(rebbecca)\nSalivary(rebbecca) and not Acheronian(rebbecca) -> not Leaved(rebbecca)\nforall x (Salivary(x) and not Numinous(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Acheronian(x) and Fourpenny(x) -> not Leaved(x))\n\nnot Acheronian(merv)\n\nSalivary(merv) and Minoan(merv) and forall x (Salivary(x) and Minoan(x) -> Acheronian(x)) -> therefore Acheronian(merv)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Ole is engrossing. Ole is unexcited. Ole is impassive. Ole is not accusive. Osbourne is engrossing. Marjy is engrossing. Marjy is bibulous. Marjy is wonky. Marjy is unexcited. Marjy is not impassive. Marjy is not accusive. Marjy is asyndetic. Melicent is engrossing. Melicent is bibulous. Melicent is wonky. Melicent is asyndetic. All asyndetic people are wonky. Red, engrossing people are wonky. All wonky people are unexcited. If someone is asyndetic and not bibulous then they are not unexcited. If Osbourne is engrossing then Osbourne is asyndetic. If Osbourne is unexcited and Osbourne is not wonky then Osbourne is not impassive. If someone is unexcited and not asyndetic then they are impassive. Furry, accusive people are not impassive. Osbourne is wonky.", "logic": "\nEngrossing(ole)\nUnexcited(ole)\nImpassive(ole)\nnot Accusive(ole)\nEngrossing(osbourne)\nEngrossing(marjy)\nBibulous(marjy)\nWonky(marjy)\nUnexcited(marjy)\nnot Impassive(marjy)\nnot Accusive(marjy)\nAsyndetic(marjy)\nEngrossing(melicent)\nBibulous(melicent)\nWonky(melicent)\nAsyndetic(melicent)\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Wonky(x))\nforall x (Unexcited(x) and Engrossing(x) -> Wonky(x))\nforall x (Wonky(x) -> Unexcited(x))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) and not Bibulous(x) -> not Unexcited(x))\nEngrossing(osbourne) -> Asyndetic(osbourne)\nUnexcited(osbourne) and not Wonky(osbourne) -> not Impassive(osbourne)\nforall x (Unexcited(x) and not Asyndetic(x) -> Impassive(x))\nforall x (Wonky(x) and Accusive(x) -> not Impassive(x))\n\nWonky(osbourne)\n\nEngrossing(osbourne) and Engrossing(osbourne) -> Asyndetic(osbourne) -> therefore Asyndetic(osbourne) Asyndetic(osbourne) and forall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Wonky(x)) -> therefore Wonky(osbourne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Elizabet is garbled. Elizabet is somali. Elizabet is catalectic. Elizabet is not famished. Marshal is garbled. Marcel is garbled. Marcel is penumbral. Marcel is elastic. Marcel is somali. Marcel is not catalectic. Marcel is not famished. Marcel is expiatory. Wilden is garbled. Wilden is penumbral. Wilden is elastic. Wilden is expiatory. All expiatory people are elastic. Red, garbled people are elastic. All elastic people are somali. If someone is expiatory and not penumbral then they are not somali. If Marshal is garbled then Marshal is expiatory. If Marshal is somali and Marshal is not elastic then Marshal is not catalectic. If someone is somali and not expiatory then they are catalectic. Furry, famished people are not catalectic. Marshal is not elastic.", "logic": "\nGarbled(elizabet)\nSomali(elizabet)\nCatalectic(elizabet)\nnot Famished(elizabet)\nGarbled(marshal)\nGarbled(marcel)\nPenumbral(marcel)\nElastic(marcel)\nSomali(marcel)\nnot Catalectic(marcel)\nnot Famished(marcel)\nExpiatory(marcel)\nGarbled(wilden)\nPenumbral(wilden)\nElastic(wilden)\nExpiatory(wilden)\nforall x (Expiatory(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Somali(x) and Garbled(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Somali(x))\nforall x (Expiatory(x) and not Penumbral(x) -> not Somali(x))\nGarbled(marshal) -> Expiatory(marshal)\nSomali(marshal) and not Elastic(marshal) -> not Catalectic(marshal)\nforall x (Somali(x) and not Expiatory(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) and Famished(x) -> not Catalectic(x))\n\nnot Elastic(marshal)\n\nGarbled(marshal) and Garbled(marshal) -> Expiatory(marshal) -> therefore Expiatory(marshal) Expiatory(marshal) and forall x (Expiatory(x) -> Elastic(x)) -> therefore Elastic(marshal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Legra is uncut. Legra is logy. Legra is leisured. Legra is not adrenergic. Claretta is uncut. Ender is uncut. Ender is roasted. Ender is besprent. Ender is logy. Ender is not leisured. Ender is not adrenergic. Ender is pharisaic. Jacques is uncut. Jacques is roasted. Jacques is besprent. Jacques is pharisaic. All pharisaic people are besprent. Red, uncut people are besprent. All besprent people are logy. If someone is pharisaic and not roasted then they are not logy. If Claretta is uncut then Claretta is pharisaic. If Claretta is logy and Claretta is not besprent then Claretta is not leisured. If someone is logy and not pharisaic then they are leisured. Furry, adrenergic people are not leisured. Claretta is logy.", "logic": "\nUncut(legra)\nLogy(legra)\nLeisured(legra)\nnot Adrenergic(legra)\nUncut(claretta)\nUncut(ender)\nRoasted(ender)\nBesprent(ender)\nLogy(ender)\nnot Leisured(ender)\nnot Adrenergic(ender)\nPharisaic(ender)\nUncut(jacques)\nRoasted(jacques)\nBesprent(jacques)\nPharisaic(jacques)\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Besprent(x))\nforall x (Logy(x) and Uncut(x) -> Besprent(x))\nforall x (Besprent(x) -> Logy(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) and not Roasted(x) -> not Logy(x))\nUncut(claretta) -> Pharisaic(claretta)\nLogy(claretta) and not Besprent(claretta) -> not Leisured(claretta)\nforall x (Logy(x) and not Pharisaic(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Besprent(x) and Adrenergic(x) -> not Leisured(x))\n\nLogy(claretta)\n\nUncut(claretta) and Uncut(claretta) -> Pharisaic(claretta) -> therefore Pharisaic(claretta) Pharisaic(claretta) and forall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Besprent(x)) -> therefore Besprent(claretta) Besprent(claretta) and forall x (Besprent(x) -> Logy(x)) -> therefore Logy(claretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Lysandra is eupneic. Lysandra is adored. Lysandra is evidential. Lysandra is not defeasible. Dafna is eupneic. Reg is eupneic. Reg is jiggered. Reg is crispy. Reg is adored. Reg is not evidential. Reg is not defeasible. Reg is piteous. Athene is eupneic. Athene is jiggered. Athene is crispy. Athene is piteous. All piteous people are crispy. Red, eupneic people are crispy. All crispy people are adored. If someone is piteous and not jiggered then they are not adored. If Dafna is eupneic then Dafna is piteous. If Dafna is adored and Dafna is not crispy then Dafna is not evidential. If someone is adored and not piteous then they are evidential. Furry, defeasible people are not evidential. Dafna is not adored.", "logic": "\nEupneic(lysandra)\nAdored(lysandra)\nEvidential(lysandra)\nnot Defeasible(lysandra)\nEupneic(dafna)\nEupneic(reg)\nJiggered(reg)\nCrispy(reg)\nAdored(reg)\nnot Evidential(reg)\nnot Defeasible(reg)\nPiteous(reg)\nEupneic(athene)\nJiggered(athene)\nCrispy(athene)\nPiteous(athene)\nforall x (Piteous(x) -> Crispy(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Eupneic(x) -> Crispy(x))\nforall x (Crispy(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) and not Jiggered(x) -> not Adored(x))\nEupneic(dafna) -> Piteous(dafna)\nAdored(dafna) and not Crispy(dafna) -> not Evidential(dafna)\nforall x (Adored(x) and not Piteous(x) -> Evidential(x))\nforall x (Crispy(x) and Defeasible(x) -> not Evidential(x))\n\nnot Adored(dafna)\n\nEupneic(dafna) and Eupneic(dafna) -> Piteous(dafna) -> therefore Piteous(dafna) Piteous(dafna) and forall x (Piteous(x) -> Crispy(x)) -> therefore Crispy(dafna) Crispy(dafna) and forall x (Crispy(x) -> Adored(x)) -> therefore Adored(dafna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Bellamy is unbuttoned. Bellamy is dirty. Bellamy is twentieth. Bellamy is not diplomatic. Charo is unbuttoned. Shell is unbuttoned. Shell is straying. Shell is placable. Shell is dirty. Shell is not twentieth. Shell is not diplomatic. Shell is noetic. Karl is unbuttoned. Karl is straying. Karl is placable. Karl is noetic. All noetic people are placable. Red, unbuttoned people are placable. All placable people are dirty. If someone is noetic and not straying then they are not dirty. If Charo is unbuttoned then Charo is noetic. If Charo is dirty and Charo is not placable then Charo is not twentieth. If someone is dirty and not noetic then they are twentieth. Furry, diplomatic people are not twentieth. Karl is not twentieth.", "logic": "\nUnbuttoned(bellamy)\nDirty(bellamy)\nTwentieth(bellamy)\nnot Diplomatic(bellamy)\nUnbuttoned(charo)\nUnbuttoned(shell)\nStraying(shell)\nPlacable(shell)\nDirty(shell)\nnot Twentieth(shell)\nnot Diplomatic(shell)\nNoetic(shell)\nUnbuttoned(karl)\nStraying(karl)\nPlacable(karl)\nNoetic(karl)\nforall x (Noetic(x) -> Placable(x))\nforall x (Dirty(x) and Unbuttoned(x) -> Placable(x))\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Dirty(x))\nforall x (Noetic(x) and not Straying(x) -> not Dirty(x))\nUnbuttoned(charo) -> Noetic(charo)\nDirty(charo) and not Placable(charo) -> not Twentieth(charo)\nforall x (Dirty(x) and not Noetic(x) -> Twentieth(x))\nforall x (Placable(x) and Diplomatic(x) -> not Twentieth(x))\n\nnot Twentieth(karl)\n\nforall x (Dirty(x) and not Noetic(x) -> Twentieth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Peg is downstairs. Peg is sexy. Peg is lyric. Peg is not cancelled. Kaari is downstairs. Leonid is downstairs. Leonid is latticed. Leonid is roundish. Leonid is sexy. Leonid is not lyric. Leonid is not cancelled. Leonid is indecorous. Tuck is downstairs. Tuck is latticed. Tuck is roundish. Tuck is indecorous. All indecorous people are roundish. Red, downstairs people are roundish. All roundish people are sexy. If someone is indecorous and not latticed then they are not sexy. If Kaari is downstairs then Kaari is indecorous. If Kaari is sexy and Kaari is not roundish then Kaari is not lyric. If someone is sexy and not indecorous then they are lyric. Furry, cancelled people are not lyric. Kaari is lyric.", "logic": "\nDownstairs(peg)\nSexy(peg)\nLyric(peg)\nnot Cancelled(peg)\nDownstairs(kaari)\nDownstairs(leonid)\nLatticed(leonid)\nRoundish(leonid)\nSexy(leonid)\nnot Lyric(leonid)\nnot Cancelled(leonid)\nIndecorous(leonid)\nDownstairs(tuck)\nLatticed(tuck)\nRoundish(tuck)\nIndecorous(tuck)\nforall x (Indecorous(x) -> Roundish(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Roundish(x))\nforall x (Roundish(x) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Indecorous(x) and not Latticed(x) -> not Sexy(x))\nDownstairs(kaari) -> Indecorous(kaari)\nSexy(kaari) and not Roundish(kaari) -> not Lyric(kaari)\nforall x (Sexy(x) and not Indecorous(x) -> Lyric(x))\nforall x (Roundish(x) and Cancelled(x) -> not Lyric(x))\n\nLyric(kaari)\n\nforall x (Sexy(x) and not Indecorous(x) -> Lyric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Sybil is forceless. Sybil is oleaginous. Sybil is toupeed. Sybil is not watertight. Erena is forceless. Armand is forceless. Armand is ampullary. Armand is spouting. Armand is oleaginous. Armand is not toupeed. Armand is not watertight. Armand is outclassed. Ansel is forceless. Ansel is ampullary. Ansel is spouting. Ansel is outclassed. All outclassed people are spouting. Red, forceless people are spouting. All spouting people are oleaginous. If someone is outclassed and not ampullary then they are not oleaginous. If Erena is forceless then Erena is outclassed. If Erena is oleaginous and Erena is not spouting then Erena is not toupeed. If someone is oleaginous and not outclassed then they are toupeed. Furry, watertight people are not toupeed. Erena is not ampullary.", "logic": "\nForceless(sybil)\nOleaginous(sybil)\nToupeed(sybil)\nnot Watertight(sybil)\nForceless(erena)\nForceless(armand)\nAmpullary(armand)\nSpouting(armand)\nOleaginous(armand)\nnot Toupeed(armand)\nnot Watertight(armand)\nOutclassed(armand)\nForceless(ansel)\nAmpullary(ansel)\nSpouting(ansel)\nOutclassed(ansel)\nforall x (Outclassed(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and Forceless(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Outclassed(x) and not Ampullary(x) -> not Oleaginous(x))\nForceless(erena) -> Outclassed(erena)\nOleaginous(erena) and not Spouting(erena) -> not Toupeed(erena)\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) and not Outclassed(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) and Watertight(x) -> not Toupeed(x))\n\nnot Ampullary(erena)\n\nnot Ampullary(erena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Gordan is cephalic. Gordan is memorable. Gordan is moneran. Gordan is not coppery. Florette is cephalic. Maribelle is cephalic. Maribelle is reasonless. Maribelle is nepalese. Maribelle is memorable. Maribelle is not moneran. Maribelle is not coppery. Maribelle is dantesque. Saw is cephalic. Saw is reasonless. Saw is nepalese. Saw is dantesque. All dantesque people are nepalese. Red, cephalic people are nepalese. All nepalese people are memorable. If someone is dantesque and not reasonless then they are not memorable. If Florette is cephalic then Florette is dantesque. If Florette is memorable and Florette is not nepalese then Florette is not moneran. If someone is memorable and not dantesque then they are moneran. Furry, coppery people are not moneran. Gordan is reasonless.", "logic": "\nCephalic(gordan)\nMemorable(gordan)\nMoneran(gordan)\nnot Coppery(gordan)\nCephalic(florette)\nCephalic(maribelle)\nReasonless(maribelle)\nNepalese(maribelle)\nMemorable(maribelle)\nnot Moneran(maribelle)\nnot Coppery(maribelle)\nDantesque(maribelle)\nCephalic(saw)\nReasonless(saw)\nNepalese(saw)\nDantesque(saw)\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Nepalese(x))\nforall x (Memorable(x) and Cephalic(x) -> Nepalese(x))\nforall x (Nepalese(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) and not Reasonless(x) -> not Memorable(x))\nCephalic(florette) -> Dantesque(florette)\nMemorable(florette) and not Nepalese(florette) -> not Moneran(florette)\nforall x (Memorable(x) and not Dantesque(x) -> Moneran(x))\nforall x (Nepalese(x) and Coppery(x) -> not Moneran(x))\n\nReasonless(gordan)\n\nReasonless(gordan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Elvera is leal. Elvera is dormie. Elvera is outdoorsy. Elvera is not unfounded. Cortney is leal. Leonhard is leal. Leonhard is pointed. Leonhard is axillary. Leonhard is dormie. Leonhard is not outdoorsy. Leonhard is not unfounded. Leonhard is inglorious. Daniel is leal. Daniel is pointed. Daniel is axillary. Daniel is inglorious. All inglorious people are axillary. Red, leal people are axillary. All axillary people are dormie. If someone is inglorious and not pointed then they are not dormie. If Cortney is leal then Cortney is inglorious. If Cortney is dormie and Cortney is not axillary then Cortney is not outdoorsy. If someone is dormie and not inglorious then they are outdoorsy. Furry, unfounded people are not outdoorsy. Cortney is not unfounded.", "logic": "\nLeal(elvera)\nDormie(elvera)\nOutdoorsy(elvera)\nnot Unfounded(elvera)\nLeal(cortney)\nLeal(leonhard)\nPointed(leonhard)\nAxillary(leonhard)\nDormie(leonhard)\nnot Outdoorsy(leonhard)\nnot Unfounded(leonhard)\nInglorious(leonhard)\nLeal(daniel)\nPointed(daniel)\nAxillary(daniel)\nInglorious(daniel)\nforall x (Inglorious(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Dormie(x) and Leal(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Axillary(x) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Inglorious(x) and not Pointed(x) -> not Dormie(x))\nLeal(cortney) -> Inglorious(cortney)\nDormie(cortney) and not Axillary(cortney) -> not Outdoorsy(cortney)\nforall x (Dormie(x) and not Inglorious(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Axillary(x) and Unfounded(x) -> not Outdoorsy(x))\n\nnot Unfounded(cortney)\n\nnot Unfounded(cortney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "Wilek is galwegian. Wilek is apposite. Wilek is silvery. Wilek is not bullnecked. Luigi is galwegian. Nanette is galwegian. Nanette is uncouth. Nanette is linnaean. Nanette is apposite. Nanette is not silvery. Nanette is not bullnecked. Nanette is juiceless. Tyrus is galwegian. Tyrus is uncouth. Tyrus is linnaean. Tyrus is juiceless. All juiceless people are linnaean. Red, galwegian people are linnaean. All linnaean people are apposite. If someone is juiceless and not uncouth then they are not apposite. If Luigi is galwegian then Luigi is juiceless. If Luigi is apposite and Luigi is not linnaean then Luigi is not silvery. If someone is apposite and not juiceless then they are silvery. Furry, bullnecked people are not silvery. Wilek is juiceless.", "logic": "\nGalwegian(wilek)\nApposite(wilek)\nSilvery(wilek)\nnot Bullnecked(wilek)\nGalwegian(luigi)\nGalwegian(nanette)\nUncouth(nanette)\nLinnaean(nanette)\nApposite(nanette)\nnot Silvery(nanette)\nnot Bullnecked(nanette)\nJuiceless(nanette)\nGalwegian(tyrus)\nUncouth(tyrus)\nLinnaean(tyrus)\nJuiceless(tyrus)\nforall x (Juiceless(x) -> Linnaean(x))\nforall x (Apposite(x) and Galwegian(x) -> Linnaean(x))\nforall x (Linnaean(x) -> Apposite(x))\nforall x (Juiceless(x) and not Uncouth(x) -> not Apposite(x))\nGalwegian(luigi) -> Juiceless(luigi)\nApposite(luigi) and not Linnaean(luigi) -> not Silvery(luigi)\nforall x (Apposite(x) and not Juiceless(x) -> Silvery(x))\nforall x (Linnaean(x) and Bullnecked(x) -> not Silvery(x))\n\nJuiceless(wilek)\n\nJuiceless(wilek) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-408"} {"premises": "The veda is nett. The patricio is partizan. The patricio crump the veda. If the veda crump the patricio and the veda is nett then the veda is partizan. If someone crump the patricio then they visit the patricio. If someone gallop the veda then they like the veda. If the veda gallop the patricio and the veda receive the patricio then the veda crump the patricio. If the veda crump the patricio then the patricio receive the veda. If the patricio crump the veda then the patricio is nett. The patricio crump the veda.", "logic": "\nNett(veda)\nPartizan(patricio)\nCrump(patricio, veda)\nCrump(veda, patricio) and Nett(veda) -> Partizan(veda)\nforall x (Crump(x, patricio) -> Gallop(x, patricio))\nforall x (Gallop(x, veda) -> Crump(x, veda))\nGallop(veda, patricio) and Receive(veda, patricio) -> Crump(veda, patricio)\nCrump(veda, patricio) -> Receive(patricio, veda)\nCrump(patricio, veda) -> Nett(patricio)\n\nCrump(patricio, veda)\n\ntherefore Crump(patricio, veda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6179"} {"premises": "The lucita is virginal. The dale is multistory. The dale pucker the lucita. If the lucita pucker the dale and the lucita is virginal then the lucita is multistory. If someone pucker the dale then they visit the dale. If someone solicit the lucita then they like the lucita. If the lucita solicit the dale and the lucita obsess the dale then the lucita pucker the dale. If the lucita pucker the dale then the dale obsess the lucita. If the dale pucker the lucita then the dale is virginal. The lucita is not virginal.", "logic": "\nVirginal(lucita)\nMultistory(dale)\nPucker(dale, lucita)\nPucker(lucita, dale) and Virginal(lucita) -> Multistory(lucita)\nforall x (Pucker(x, dale) -> Solicit(x, dale))\nforall x (Solicit(x, lucita) -> Pucker(x, lucita))\nSolicit(lucita, dale) and Obsess(lucita, dale) -> Pucker(lucita, dale)\nPucker(lucita, dale) -> Obsess(dale, lucita)\nPucker(dale, lucita) -> Virginal(dale)\n\nnot Virginal(lucita)\n\ntherefore Virginal(lucita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6179"} {"premises": "The taddeus is witchlike. The marty is isocyclic. The marty ting the taddeus. If the taddeus ting the marty and the taddeus is witchlike then the taddeus is isocyclic. If someone ting the marty then they visit the marty. If someone accrue the taddeus then they like the taddeus. If the taddeus accrue the marty and the taddeus monopolise the marty then the taddeus ting the marty. If the taddeus ting the marty then the marty monopolise the taddeus. If the marty ting the taddeus then the marty is witchlike. The taddeus is not isocyclic.", "logic": "\nWitchlike(taddeus)\nIsocyclic(marty)\nTing(marty, taddeus)\nTing(taddeus, marty) and Witchlike(taddeus) -> Isocyclic(taddeus)\nforall x (Ting(x, marty) -> Accrue(x, marty))\nforall x (Accrue(x, taddeus) -> Ting(x, taddeus))\nAccrue(taddeus, marty) and Monopolise(taddeus, marty) -> Ting(taddeus, marty)\nTing(taddeus, marty) -> Monopolise(marty, taddeus)\nTing(marty, taddeus) -> Witchlike(marty)\n\nnot Isocyclic(taddeus)\n\nTing(taddeus, marty) and Witchlike(taddeus) -> Isocyclic(taddeus) <- Accrue(taddeus, marty) and Monopolise(taddeus, marty) -> Ting(taddeus, marty) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6179"} {"premises": "The valenka is crescendo. The osborne is unemphatic. The osborne heighten the valenka. If the valenka heighten the osborne and the valenka is crescendo then the valenka is unemphatic. If someone heighten the osborne then they visit the osborne. If someone handicap the valenka then they like the valenka. If the valenka handicap the osborne and the valenka bethink the osborne then the valenka heighten the osborne. If the valenka heighten the osborne then the osborne bethink the valenka. If the osborne heighten the valenka then the osborne is crescendo. The osborne is young.", "logic": "\nCrescendo(valenka)\nUnemphatic(osborne)\nHeighten(osborne, valenka)\nHeighten(valenka, osborne) and Crescendo(valenka) -> Unemphatic(valenka)\nforall x (Heighten(x, osborne) -> Handicap(x, osborne))\nforall x (Handicap(x, valenka) -> Heighten(x, valenka))\nHandicap(valenka, osborne) and Bethink(valenka, osborne) -> Heighten(valenka, osborne)\nHeighten(valenka, osborne) -> Bethink(osborne, valenka)\nHeighten(osborne, valenka) -> Crescendo(osborne)\n\nYoung(osborne)\n\nYoung(osborne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6179"} {"premises": "The raimund is truthful. If someone is truthful then they are tattered. Nice people are not tattered. If the raimund is tattered then the raimund is pugnacious. Nice, tattered people are truthful. If the raimund is randomised then the raimund is tattered. If someone is indicative and not truthful then they are pugnacious. Nice, truthful people are pugnacious. All pugnacious, tattered people are indicative. The raimund is truthful.", "logic": "\nTruthful(raimund)\nforall x (Truthful(x) -> Tattered(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> not Tattered(x))\nTattered(raimund) -> Pugnacious(raimund)\nforall x (Randomised(x) and Tattered(x) -> Truthful(x))\nRandomised(raimund) -> Tattered(raimund)\nforall x (Indicative(x) and not Truthful(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) and Truthful(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) and Tattered(x) -> Indicative(x))\n\nTruthful(raimund)\n\ntherefore Truthful(raimund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The sheppard is puberulent. If someone is puberulent then they are continuant. Nice people are not continuant. If the sheppard is continuant then the sheppard is unvendible. Nice, continuant people are puberulent. If the sheppard is laboured then the sheppard is continuant. If someone is variant and not puberulent then they are unvendible. Nice, puberulent people are unvendible. All unvendible, continuant people are variant. The sheppard is not puberulent.", "logic": "\nPuberulent(sheppard)\nforall x (Puberulent(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> not Continuant(x))\nContinuant(sheppard) -> Unvendible(sheppard)\nforall x (Laboured(x) and Continuant(x) -> Puberulent(x))\nLaboured(sheppard) -> Continuant(sheppard)\nforall x (Variant(x) and not Puberulent(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Unvendible(x) and Continuant(x) -> Variant(x))\n\nnot Puberulent(sheppard)\n\ntherefore Puberulent(sheppard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The tressa is unpictured. If someone is unpictured then they are pious. Nice people are not pious. If the tressa is pious then the tressa is groveling. Nice, pious people are unpictured. If the tressa is loco then the tressa is pious. If someone is pondering and not unpictured then they are groveling. Nice, unpictured people are groveling. All groveling, pious people are pondering. The tressa is pious.", "logic": "\nUnpictured(tressa)\nforall x (Unpictured(x) -> Pious(x))\nforall x (Loco(x) -> not Pious(x))\nPious(tressa) -> Groveling(tressa)\nforall x (Loco(x) and Pious(x) -> Unpictured(x))\nLoco(tressa) -> Pious(tressa)\nforall x (Pondering(x) and not Unpictured(x) -> Groveling(x))\nforall x (Loco(x) and Unpictured(x) -> Groveling(x))\nforall x (Groveling(x) and Pious(x) -> Pondering(x))\n\nPious(tressa)\n\nUnpictured(tressa) and forall x (Unpictured(x) -> Pious(x)) -> therefore Pious(tressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The keelia is milklike. If someone is milklike then they are uppercase. Nice people are not uppercase. If the keelia is uppercase then the keelia is tricky. Nice, uppercase people are milklike. If the keelia is unbranded then the keelia is uppercase. If someone is periodic and not milklike then they are tricky. Nice, milklike people are tricky. All tricky, uppercase people are periodic. The keelia is not uppercase.", "logic": "\nMilklike(keelia)\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Uppercase(x))\nforall x (Unbranded(x) -> not Uppercase(x))\nUppercase(keelia) -> Tricky(keelia)\nforall x (Unbranded(x) and Uppercase(x) -> Milklike(x))\nUnbranded(keelia) -> Uppercase(keelia)\nforall x (Periodic(x) and not Milklike(x) -> Tricky(x))\nforall x (Unbranded(x) and Milklike(x) -> Tricky(x))\nforall x (Tricky(x) and Uppercase(x) -> Periodic(x))\n\nnot Uppercase(keelia)\n\nMilklike(keelia) and forall x (Milklike(x) -> Uppercase(x)) -> therefore Uppercase(keelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The stanislaw is hedonic. If someone is hedonic then they are dionysian. Nice people are not dionysian. If the stanislaw is dionysian then the stanislaw is sparkling. Nice, dionysian people are hedonic. If the stanislaw is palatable then the stanislaw is dionysian. If someone is buttery and not hedonic then they are sparkling. Nice, hedonic people are sparkling. All sparkling, dionysian people are buttery. The stanislaw is sparkling.", "logic": "\nHedonic(stanislaw)\nforall x (Hedonic(x) -> Dionysian(x))\nforall x (Palatable(x) -> not Dionysian(x))\nDionysian(stanislaw) -> Sparkling(stanislaw)\nforall x (Palatable(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Hedonic(x))\nPalatable(stanislaw) -> Dionysian(stanislaw)\nforall x (Buttery(x) and not Hedonic(x) -> Sparkling(x))\nforall x (Palatable(x) and Hedonic(x) -> Sparkling(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Buttery(x))\n\nSparkling(stanislaw)\n\nHedonic(stanislaw) and forall x (Hedonic(x) -> Dionysian(x)) -> therefore Dionysian(stanislaw) Dionysian(stanislaw) and Dionysian(stanislaw) -> Sparkling(stanislaw) -> therefore Sparkling(stanislaw)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The emogene is beamy. If someone is beamy then they are somber. Nice people are not somber. If the emogene is somber then the emogene is tart. Nice, somber people are beamy. If the emogene is booted then the emogene is somber. If someone is unliveable and not beamy then they are tart. Nice, beamy people are tart. All tart, somber people are unliveable. The emogene is not tart.", "logic": "\nBeamy(emogene)\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Somber(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) -> not Somber(x))\nSomber(emogene) -> Tart(emogene)\nforall x (Booted(x) and Somber(x) -> Beamy(x))\nBooted(emogene) -> Somber(emogene)\nforall x (Unliveable(x) and not Beamy(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) and Beamy(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Tart(x) and Somber(x) -> Unliveable(x))\n\nnot Tart(emogene)\n\nBeamy(emogene) and forall x (Beamy(x) -> Somber(x)) -> therefore Somber(emogene) Somber(emogene) and Somber(emogene) -> Tart(emogene) -> therefore Tart(emogene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The roxane is together. If someone is together then they are forfeited. Nice people are not forfeited. If the roxane is forfeited then the roxane is basipetal. Nice, forfeited people are together. If the roxane is bacterioid then the roxane is forfeited. If someone is embonpoint and not together then they are basipetal. Nice, together people are basipetal. All basipetal, forfeited people are embonpoint. The roxane is embonpoint.", "logic": "\nTogether(roxane)\nforall x (Together(x) -> Forfeited(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> not Forfeited(x))\nForfeited(roxane) -> Basipetal(roxane)\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and Forfeited(x) -> Together(x))\nBacterioid(roxane) -> Forfeited(roxane)\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) and not Together(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and Together(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Basipetal(x) and Forfeited(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\n\nEmbonpoint(roxane)\n\nTogether(roxane) and forall x (Together(x) -> Forfeited(x)) -> therefore Forfeited(roxane) Forfeited(roxane) and Forfeited(roxane) -> Basipetal(roxane) -> therefore Basipetal(roxane) Together(roxane) and forall x (Together(x) -> Forfeited(x)) -> therefore Forfeited(roxane) Basipetal(roxane) and Forfeited(roxane) and forall x (Basipetal(x) and Forfeited(x) -> Embonpoint(x)) -> therefore Embonpoint(roxane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The abagail is lilac. If someone is lilac then they are shaven. Nice people are not shaven. If the abagail is shaven then the abagail is irresolute. Nice, shaven people are lilac. If the abagail is sexual then the abagail is shaven. If someone is ugly and not lilac then they are irresolute. Nice, lilac people are irresolute. All irresolute, shaven people are ugly. The abagail is not ugly.", "logic": "\nLilac(abagail)\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> Shaven(x))\nforall x (Sexual(x) -> not Shaven(x))\nShaven(abagail) -> Irresolute(abagail)\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Shaven(x) -> Lilac(x))\nSexual(abagail) -> Shaven(abagail)\nforall x (Ugly(x) and not Lilac(x) -> Irresolute(x))\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Lilac(x) -> Irresolute(x))\nforall x (Irresolute(x) and Shaven(x) -> Ugly(x))\n\nnot Ugly(abagail)\n\nLilac(abagail) and forall x (Lilac(x) -> Shaven(x)) -> therefore Shaven(abagail) Shaven(abagail) and Shaven(abagail) -> Irresolute(abagail) -> therefore Irresolute(abagail) Lilac(abagail) and forall x (Lilac(x) -> Shaven(x)) -> therefore Shaven(abagail) Irresolute(abagail) and Shaven(abagail) and forall x (Irresolute(x) and Shaven(x) -> Ugly(x)) -> therefore Ugly(abagail)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The isobel is palladian. If someone is palladian then they are unseemly. Nice people are not unseemly. If the isobel is unseemly then the isobel is tilled. Nice, unseemly people are palladian. If the isobel is miasmic then the isobel is unseemly. If someone is tactless and not palladian then they are tilled. Nice, palladian people are tilled. All tilled, unseemly people are tactless. The isobel does not visit the isobel.", "logic": "\nPalladian(isobel)\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Unseemly(x))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) -> not Unseemly(x))\nUnseemly(isobel) -> Tilled(isobel)\nforall x (Miasmic(x) and Unseemly(x) -> Palladian(x))\nMiasmic(isobel) -> Unseemly(isobel)\nforall x (Tactless(x) and not Palladian(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) and Palladian(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Tilled(x) and Unseemly(x) -> Tactless(x))\n\nnot Visits(isobel, isobel)\n\nnot Visits(isobel, isobel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The whitney is impulsive. If someone is impulsive then they are mown. Nice people are not mown. If the whitney is mown then the whitney is homostylic. Nice, mown people are impulsive. If the whitney is publicized then the whitney is mown. If someone is bullheaded and not impulsive then they are homostylic. Nice, impulsive people are homostylic. All homostylic, mown people are bullheaded. The whitney needs the whitney.", "logic": "\nImpulsive(whitney)\nforall x (Impulsive(x) -> Mown(x))\nforall x (Publicized(x) -> not Mown(x))\nMown(whitney) -> Homostylic(whitney)\nforall x (Publicized(x) and Mown(x) -> Impulsive(x))\nPublicized(whitney) -> Mown(whitney)\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) and not Impulsive(x) -> Homostylic(x))\nforall x (Publicized(x) and Impulsive(x) -> Homostylic(x))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) and Mown(x) -> Bullheaded(x))\n\nNeeds(whitney, whitney)\n\nNeeds(whitney, whitney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The rickard is crippled. If someone is crippled then they are aphetic. Nice people are not aphetic. If the rickard is aphetic then the rickard is worried. Nice, aphetic people are crippled. If the rickard is eristic then the rickard is aphetic. If someone is salted and not crippled then they are worried. Nice, crippled people are worried. All worried, aphetic people are salted. The rickard does not see the rickard.", "logic": "\nCrippled(rickard)\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Aphetic(x))\nforall x (Eristic(x) -> not Aphetic(x))\nAphetic(rickard) -> Worried(rickard)\nforall x (Eristic(x) and Aphetic(x) -> Crippled(x))\nEristic(rickard) -> Aphetic(rickard)\nforall x (Salted(x) and not Crippled(x) -> Worried(x))\nforall x (Eristic(x) and Crippled(x) -> Worried(x))\nforall x (Worried(x) and Aphetic(x) -> Salted(x))\n\nnot Sees(rickard, rickard)\n\nnot Sees(rickard, rickard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "The wake is pinstriped. If someone is pinstriped then they are victimized. Nice people are not victimized. If the wake is victimized then the wake is bragging. Nice, victimized people are pinstriped. If the wake is cashable then the wake is victimized. If someone is louvered and not pinstriped then they are bragging. Nice, pinstriped people are bragging. All bragging, victimized people are louvered. The wake is cashable.", "logic": "\nPinstriped(wake)\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Victimized(x))\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> not Victimized(x))\nVictimized(wake) -> Bragging(wake)\nforall x (Cashable(x) and Victimized(x) -> Pinstriped(x))\nCashable(wake) -> Victimized(wake)\nforall x (Louvered(x) and not Pinstriped(x) -> Bragging(x))\nforall x (Cashable(x) and Pinstriped(x) -> Bragging(x))\nforall x (Bragging(x) and Victimized(x) -> Louvered(x))\n\nCashable(wake)\n\nCashable(wake) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1614"} {"premises": "Nolana is liii. Adelle is intermural. Patty is tyrannic. Smart people are innumerate. All innumerate, tyrannic people are quilted. If someone is quilted then they are positive. Nolana is liii.", "logic": "\nLiii(nolana)\nIntermural(adelle)\nTyrannic(patty)\nforall x (Tyrannic(x) -> Innumerate(x))\nforall x (Innumerate(x) and Tyrannic(x) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Quilted(x) -> Positive(x))\n\nLiii(nolana)\n\ntherefore Liii(nolana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Briana is liable. Filipe is distorted. Darsey is illicit. Smart people are pubertal. All pubertal, illicit people are arithmetic. If someone is arithmetic then they are reviving. Filipe is not distorted.", "logic": "\nLiable(briana)\nDistorted(filipe)\nIllicit(darsey)\nforall x (Illicit(x) -> Pubertal(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Illicit(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Reviving(x))\n\nnot Distorted(filipe)\n\ntherefore Distorted(filipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Hortensia is boylike. Rozalie is uncrowned. Paloma is unsung. Smart people are applied. All applied, unsung people are gutsy. If someone is gutsy then they are barelegged. Paloma is applied.", "logic": "\nBoylike(hortensia)\nUncrowned(rozalie)\nUnsung(paloma)\nforall x (Unsung(x) -> Applied(x))\nforall x (Applied(x) and Unsung(x) -> Gutsy(x))\nforall x (Gutsy(x) -> Barelegged(x))\n\nApplied(paloma)\n\nUnsung(paloma) and forall x (Unsung(x) -> Applied(x)) -> therefore Applied(paloma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Winna is inviolate. Peggie is plumlike. Hoyt is ironclad. Smart people are ignored. All ignored, ironclad people are asphaltic. If someone is asphaltic then they are abhorrent. Hoyt is not ignored.", "logic": "\nInviolate(winna)\nPlumlike(peggie)\nIronclad(hoyt)\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Ironclad(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) -> Abhorrent(x))\n\nnot Ignored(hoyt)\n\nIronclad(hoyt) and forall x (Ironclad(x) -> Ignored(x)) -> therefore Ignored(hoyt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Lorrayne is telephonic. Arda is fixed. Shirah is abyssal. Smart people are eolithic. All eolithic, abyssal people are noteworthy. If someone is noteworthy then they are rhizoidal. Shirah is noteworthy.", "logic": "\nTelephonic(lorrayne)\nFixed(arda)\nAbyssal(shirah)\nforall x (Abyssal(x) -> Eolithic(x))\nforall x (Eolithic(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Noteworthy(x))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) -> Rhizoidal(x))\n\nNoteworthy(shirah)\n\nAbyssal(shirah) and forall x (Abyssal(x) -> Eolithic(x)) -> therefore Eolithic(shirah) Eolithic(shirah) and Abyssal(shirah) and forall x (Eolithic(x) and Abyssal(x) -> Noteworthy(x)) -> therefore Noteworthy(shirah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Royal is silenced. Mahmoud is tapped. Natalie is germinal. Smart people are homostylic. All homostylic, germinal people are carbolated. If someone is carbolated then they are calibrated. Natalie is not carbolated.", "logic": "\nSilenced(royal)\nTapped(mahmoud)\nGerminal(natalie)\nforall x (Germinal(x) -> Homostylic(x))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) and Germinal(x) -> Carbolated(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Calibrated(x))\n\nnot Carbolated(natalie)\n\nGerminal(natalie) and forall x (Germinal(x) -> Homostylic(x)) -> therefore Homostylic(natalie) Homostylic(natalie) and Germinal(natalie) and forall x (Homostylic(x) and Germinal(x) -> Carbolated(x)) -> therefore Carbolated(natalie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Anais is combative. Kenyon is calyptrate. Clemens is frivolous. Smart people are omani. All omani, frivolous people are itchy. If someone is itchy then they are moorish. Clemens is moorish.", "logic": "\nCombative(anais)\nCalyptrate(kenyon)\nFrivolous(clemens)\nforall x (Frivolous(x) -> Omani(x))\nforall x (Omani(x) and Frivolous(x) -> Itchy(x))\nforall x (Itchy(x) -> Moorish(x))\n\nMoorish(clemens)\n\nFrivolous(clemens) and forall x (Frivolous(x) -> Omani(x)) -> therefore Omani(clemens) Omani(clemens) and Frivolous(clemens) and forall x (Omani(x) and Frivolous(x) -> Itchy(x)) -> therefore Itchy(clemens) Itchy(clemens) and forall x (Itchy(x) -> Moorish(x)) -> therefore Moorish(clemens)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Berk is enervating. Lorne is trendy. Pavia is subject. Smart people are wisplike. All wisplike, subject people are seventh. If someone is seventh then they are eutherian. Pavia is not eutherian.", "logic": "\nEnervating(berk)\nTrendy(lorne)\nSubject(pavia)\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Wisplike(x))\nforall x (Wisplike(x) and Subject(x) -> Seventh(x))\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> Eutherian(x))\n\nnot Eutherian(pavia)\n\nSubject(pavia) and forall x (Subject(x) -> Wisplike(x)) -> therefore Wisplike(pavia) Wisplike(pavia) and Subject(pavia) and forall x (Wisplike(x) and Subject(x) -> Seventh(x)) -> therefore Seventh(pavia) Seventh(pavia) and forall x (Seventh(x) -> Eutherian(x)) -> therefore Eutherian(pavia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Roxane is detersive. Etti is fiddling. Cathrin is faltering. Smart people are snappish. All snappish, faltering people are lethargic. If someone is lethargic then they are hypoactive. Etti is not lethargic.", "logic": "\nDetersive(roxane)\nFiddling(etti)\nFaltering(cathrin)\nforall x (Faltering(x) -> Snappish(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) and Faltering(x) -> Lethargic(x))\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\n\nnot Lethargic(etti)\n\nforall x (Snappish(x) and Faltering(x) -> Lethargic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Keri is silenced. Gustie is tokenish. Mateo is resentful. Smart people are icteric. All icteric, resentful people are saclike. If someone is saclike then they are tonic. Keri is saclike.", "logic": "\nSilenced(keri)\nTokenish(gustie)\nResentful(mateo)\nforall x (Resentful(x) -> Icteric(x))\nforall x (Icteric(x) and Resentful(x) -> Saclike(x))\nforall x (Saclike(x) -> Tonic(x))\n\nSaclike(keri)\n\nforall x (Icteric(x) and Resentful(x) -> Saclike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Barby is jutting. Dodie is accentual. Hailee is accustomed. Smart people are faux. All faux, accustomed people are aware. If someone is aware then they are echoing. Barby is not faux.", "logic": "\nJutting(barby)\nAccentual(dodie)\nAccustomed(hailee)\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Faux(x))\nforall x (Faux(x) and Accustomed(x) -> Aware(x))\nforall x (Aware(x) -> Echoing(x))\n\nnot Faux(barby)\n\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Faux(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Woochang is direful. Lemmy is unmodified. Elihu is fossorial. Smart people are bacillar. All bacillar, fossorial people are discovered. If someone is discovered then they are closing. Woochang is closing.", "logic": "\nDireful(woochang)\nUnmodified(lemmy)\nFossorial(elihu)\nforall x (Fossorial(x) -> Bacillar(x))\nforall x (Bacillar(x) and Fossorial(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Discovered(x) -> Closing(x))\n\nClosing(woochang)\n\nforall x (Discovered(x) -> Closing(x)) <- forall x (Bacillar(x) and Fossorial(x) -> Discovered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Nady is discerning. Staford is recessed. Ragnar is ecumenical. Smart people are convivial. All convivial, ecumenical people are primaeval. If someone is primaeval then they are trochaic. Staford is not blue.", "logic": "\nDiscerning(nady)\nRecessed(staford)\nEcumenical(ragnar)\nforall x (Ecumenical(x) -> Convivial(x))\nforall x (Convivial(x) and Ecumenical(x) -> Primaeval(x))\nforall x (Primaeval(x) -> Trochaic(x))\n\nnot Blue(staford)\n\nnot Blue(staford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Fiann is southmost. Norina is unrefined. Nellie is keeled. Smart people are sagacious. All sagacious, keeled people are tripartite. If someone is tripartite then they are ovine. Nellie is blue.", "logic": "\nSouthmost(fiann)\nUnrefined(norina)\nKeeled(nellie)\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nforall x (Sagacious(x) and Keeled(x) -> Tripartite(x))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) -> Ovine(x))\n\nBlue(nellie)\n\nBlue(nellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Roobbie is affirmable. Ragnhild is cunning. Pepita is jumbo. Smart people are plausive. All plausive, jumbo people are detersive. If someone is detersive then they are modest. Roobbie is not jumbo.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(roobbie)\nCunning(ragnhild)\nJumbo(pepita)\nforall x (Jumbo(x) -> Plausive(x))\nforall x (Plausive(x) and Jumbo(x) -> Detersive(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) -> Modest(x))\n\nnot Jumbo(roobbie)\n\nnot Jumbo(roobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Patty is cognate. Lila is abranchial. Marc is baltic. Smart people are bentonitic. All bentonitic, baltic people are fictive. If someone is fictive then they are fitting. Patty is abranchial.", "logic": "\nCognate(patty)\nAbranchial(lila)\nBaltic(marc)\nforall x (Baltic(x) -> Bentonitic(x))\nforall x (Bentonitic(x) and Baltic(x) -> Fictive(x))\nforall x (Fictive(x) -> Fitting(x))\n\nAbranchial(patty)\n\nAbranchial(patty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1709"} {"premises": "Francesca is suspended. Francesca is obliging. Francesca is virgin. Francesca is xlvi. Dunc is suspended. Dunc is obliging. Dunc is desirable. Dunc is xlvi. Dunc is offhanded. Dunc is neuronic. Smart, obliging things are desirable. If Dunc is virgin then Dunc is desirable. Blue, xlvi things are offhanded. If Dunc is suspended and Dunc is neuronic then Dunc is desirable. All obliging things are suspended. Blue, obliging things are offhanded. If something is desirable then it is xlvi. If something is xlvi and virgin then it is suspended. Dunc is offhanded.", "logic": "\nSuspended(francesca)\nObliging(francesca)\nVirgin(francesca)\nXlvi(francesca)\nSuspended(dunc)\nObliging(dunc)\nDesirable(dunc)\nXlvi(dunc)\nOffhanded(dunc)\nNeuronic(dunc)\nforall x (Offhanded(x) and Obliging(x) -> Desirable(x))\nVirgin(dunc) -> Desirable(dunc)\nforall x (Suspended(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nSuspended(dunc) and Neuronic(dunc) -> Desirable(dunc)\nforall x (Obliging(x) -> Suspended(x))\nforall x (Suspended(x) and Obliging(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Xlvi(x) and Virgin(x) -> Suspended(x))\n\nOffhanded(dunc)\n\ntherefore Offhanded(dunc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Erda is collegial. Erda is folksy. Erda is zolaesque. Erda is convergent. Colette is collegial. Colette is folksy. Colette is confused. Colette is convergent. Colette is sound. Colette is color. Smart, folksy things are confused. If Colette is zolaesque then Colette is confused. Blue, convergent things are sound. If Colette is collegial and Colette is color then Colette is confused. All folksy things are collegial. Blue, folksy things are sound. If something is confused then it is convergent. If something is convergent and zolaesque then it is collegial. Colette is not convergent.", "logic": "\nCollegial(erda)\nFolksy(erda)\nZolaesque(erda)\nConvergent(erda)\nCollegial(colette)\nFolksy(colette)\nConfused(colette)\nConvergent(colette)\nSound(colette)\nColor(colette)\nforall x (Sound(x) and Folksy(x) -> Confused(x))\nZolaesque(colette) -> Confused(colette)\nforall x (Collegial(x) and Convergent(x) -> Sound(x))\nCollegial(colette) and Color(colette) -> Confused(colette)\nforall x (Folksy(x) -> Collegial(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) and Folksy(x) -> Sound(x))\nforall x (Confused(x) -> Convergent(x))\nforall x (Convergent(x) and Zolaesque(x) -> Collegial(x))\n\nnot Convergent(colette)\n\ntherefore Convergent(colette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Hoyt is logical. Hoyt is totipotent. Hoyt is suburban. Hoyt is demode. Flin is logical. Flin is totipotent. Flin is crookback. Flin is demode. Flin is wacky. Flin is gigantic. Smart, totipotent things are crookback. If Flin is suburban then Flin is crookback. Blue, demode things are wacky. If Flin is logical and Flin is gigantic then Flin is crookback. All totipotent things are logical. Blue, totipotent things are wacky. If something is crookback then it is demode. If something is demode and suburban then it is logical. Hoyt is wacky.", "logic": "\nLogical(hoyt)\nTotipotent(hoyt)\nSuburban(hoyt)\nDemode(hoyt)\nLogical(flin)\nTotipotent(flin)\nCrookback(flin)\nDemode(flin)\nWacky(flin)\nGigantic(flin)\nforall x (Wacky(x) and Totipotent(x) -> Crookback(x))\nSuburban(flin) -> Crookback(flin)\nforall x (Logical(x) and Demode(x) -> Wacky(x))\nLogical(flin) and Gigantic(flin) -> Crookback(flin)\nforall x (Totipotent(x) -> Logical(x))\nforall x (Logical(x) and Totipotent(x) -> Wacky(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Demode(x) and Suburban(x) -> Logical(x))\n\nWacky(hoyt)\n\nLogical(hoyt) and Totipotent(hoyt) and forall x (Logical(x) and Totipotent(x) -> Wacky(x)) -> therefore Wacky(hoyt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Ingeberg is beardless. Ingeberg is amused. Ingeberg is arching. Ingeberg is sought. Mahesh is beardless. Mahesh is amused. Mahesh is angulate. Mahesh is sought. Mahesh is ghastly. Mahesh is accordant. Smart, amused things are angulate. If Mahesh is arching then Mahesh is angulate. Blue, sought things are ghastly. If Mahesh is beardless and Mahesh is accordant then Mahesh is angulate. All amused things are beardless. Blue, amused things are ghastly. If something is angulate then it is sought. If something is sought and arching then it is beardless. Ingeberg is not ghastly.", "logic": "\nBeardless(ingeberg)\nAmused(ingeberg)\nArching(ingeberg)\nSought(ingeberg)\nBeardless(mahesh)\nAmused(mahesh)\nAngulate(mahesh)\nSought(mahesh)\nGhastly(mahesh)\nAccordant(mahesh)\nforall x (Ghastly(x) and Amused(x) -> Angulate(x))\nArching(mahesh) -> Angulate(mahesh)\nforall x (Beardless(x) and Sought(x) -> Ghastly(x))\nBeardless(mahesh) and Accordant(mahesh) -> Angulate(mahesh)\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Beardless(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) and Amused(x) -> Ghastly(x))\nforall x (Angulate(x) -> Sought(x))\nforall x (Sought(x) and Arching(x) -> Beardless(x))\n\nnot Ghastly(ingeberg)\n\nBeardless(ingeberg) and Amused(ingeberg) and forall x (Beardless(x) and Amused(x) -> Ghastly(x)) -> therefore Ghastly(ingeberg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Eddie is efficient. Eddie is archducal. Eddie is shellproof. Eddie is plucky. Ruthy is efficient. Ruthy is archducal. Ruthy is topless. Ruthy is plucky. Ruthy is celluloid. Ruthy is echoless. Smart, archducal things are topless. If Ruthy is shellproof then Ruthy is topless. Blue, plucky things are celluloid. If Ruthy is efficient and Ruthy is echoless then Ruthy is topless. All archducal things are efficient. Blue, archducal things are celluloid. If something is topless then it is plucky. If something is plucky and shellproof then it is efficient. Eddie is topless.", "logic": "\nEfficient(eddie)\nArchducal(eddie)\nShellproof(eddie)\nPlucky(eddie)\nEfficient(ruthy)\nArchducal(ruthy)\nTopless(ruthy)\nPlucky(ruthy)\nCelluloid(ruthy)\nEcholess(ruthy)\nforall x (Celluloid(x) and Archducal(x) -> Topless(x))\nShellproof(ruthy) -> Topless(ruthy)\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Plucky(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nEfficient(ruthy) and Echoless(ruthy) -> Topless(ruthy)\nforall x (Archducal(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Archducal(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Topless(x) -> Plucky(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) and Shellproof(x) -> Efficient(x))\n\nTopless(eddie)\n\nEfficient(eddie) and Archducal(eddie) and forall x (Efficient(x) and Archducal(x) -> Celluloid(x)) -> therefore Celluloid(eddie) Celluloid(eddie) and Archducal(eddie) and forall x (Celluloid(x) and Archducal(x) -> Topless(x)) -> therefore Topless(eddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Anjela is abominable. Anjela is toned. Anjela is oozy. Anjela is cycloidal. Penelope is abominable. Penelope is toned. Penelope is caesarian. Penelope is cycloidal. Penelope is humanist. Penelope is posthumous. Smart, toned things are caesarian. If Penelope is oozy then Penelope is caesarian. Blue, cycloidal things are humanist. If Penelope is abominable and Penelope is posthumous then Penelope is caesarian. All toned things are abominable. Blue, toned things are humanist. If something is caesarian then it is cycloidal. If something is cycloidal and oozy then it is abominable. Anjela is not caesarian.", "logic": "\nAbominable(anjela)\nToned(anjela)\nOozy(anjela)\nCycloidal(anjela)\nAbominable(penelope)\nToned(penelope)\nCaesarian(penelope)\nCycloidal(penelope)\nHumanist(penelope)\nPosthumous(penelope)\nforall x (Humanist(x) and Toned(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nOozy(penelope) -> Caesarian(penelope)\nforall x (Abominable(x) and Cycloidal(x) -> Humanist(x))\nAbominable(penelope) and Posthumous(penelope) -> Caesarian(penelope)\nforall x (Toned(x) -> Abominable(x))\nforall x (Abominable(x) and Toned(x) -> Humanist(x))\nforall x (Caesarian(x) -> Cycloidal(x))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) and Oozy(x) -> Abominable(x))\n\nnot Caesarian(anjela)\n\nAbominable(anjela) and Toned(anjela) and forall x (Abominable(x) and Toned(x) -> Humanist(x)) -> therefore Humanist(anjela) Humanist(anjela) and Toned(anjela) and forall x (Humanist(x) and Toned(x) -> Caesarian(x)) -> therefore Caesarian(anjela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Natala is ruly. Natala is twoscore. Natala is cantering. Natala is counter. Nessie is ruly. Nessie is twoscore. Nessie is puppyish. Nessie is counter. Nessie is predictive. Nessie is monestrous. Smart, twoscore things are puppyish. If Nessie is cantering then Nessie is puppyish. Blue, counter things are predictive. If Nessie is ruly and Nessie is monestrous then Nessie is puppyish. All twoscore things are ruly. Blue, twoscore things are predictive. If something is puppyish then it is counter. If something is counter and cantering then it is ruly. Nessie is not cantering.", "logic": "\nRuly(natala)\nTwoscore(natala)\nCantering(natala)\nCounter(natala)\nRuly(nessie)\nTwoscore(nessie)\nPuppyish(nessie)\nCounter(nessie)\nPredictive(nessie)\nMonestrous(nessie)\nforall x (Predictive(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Puppyish(x))\nCantering(nessie) -> Puppyish(nessie)\nforall x (Ruly(x) and Counter(x) -> Predictive(x))\nRuly(nessie) and Monestrous(nessie) -> Puppyish(nessie)\nforall x (Twoscore(x) -> Ruly(x))\nforall x (Ruly(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Predictive(x))\nforall x (Puppyish(x) -> Counter(x))\nforall x (Counter(x) and Cantering(x) -> Ruly(x))\n\nnot Cantering(nessie)\n\nnot Cantering(nessie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Cobbie is unentitled. Cobbie is aging. Cobbie is hunted. Cobbie is resolute. Harlin is unentitled. Harlin is aging. Harlin is sotho. Harlin is resolute. Harlin is reinforced. Harlin is worth. Smart, aging things are sotho. If Harlin is hunted then Harlin is sotho. Blue, resolute things are reinforced. If Harlin is unentitled and Harlin is worth then Harlin is sotho. All aging things are unentitled. Blue, aging things are reinforced. If something is sotho then it is resolute. If something is resolute and hunted then it is unentitled. Cobbie is worth.", "logic": "\nUnentitled(cobbie)\nAging(cobbie)\nHunted(cobbie)\nResolute(cobbie)\nUnentitled(harlin)\nAging(harlin)\nSotho(harlin)\nResolute(harlin)\nReinforced(harlin)\nWorth(harlin)\nforall x (Reinforced(x) and Aging(x) -> Sotho(x))\nHunted(harlin) -> Sotho(harlin)\nforall x (Unentitled(x) and Resolute(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nUnentitled(harlin) and Worth(harlin) -> Sotho(harlin)\nforall x (Aging(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Unentitled(x) and Aging(x) -> Reinforced(x))\nforall x (Sotho(x) -> Resolute(x))\nforall x (Resolute(x) and Hunted(x) -> Unentitled(x))\n\nWorth(cobbie)\n\nWorth(cobbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-511"} {"premises": "Barris is overlarge. Barris is scarce. Barris is digestive. Barris is undrawn. Barris is coagulable. Barris is unshorn. Barris is rosaceous. Rough, digestive people are scarce. If someone is digestive then they are undrawn. If Barris is overlarge then Barris is coagulable. Barris is rosaceous.", "logic": "\nOverlarge(barris)\nScarce(barris)\nDigestive(barris)\nUndrawn(barris)\nCoagulable(barris)\nUnshorn(barris)\nRosaceous(barris)\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Digestive(x) -> Scarce(x))\nforall x (Digestive(x) -> Undrawn(x))\nOverlarge(barris) -> Coagulable(barris)\n\nRosaceous(barris)\n\ntherefore Rosaceous(barris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6585"} {"premises": "Eryn is mythologic. Eryn is undigested. Eryn is cyclonic. Eryn is catholic. Eryn is bellyless. Eryn is censored. Eryn is hindermost. Rough, cyclonic people are undigested. If someone is cyclonic then they are catholic. If Eryn is mythologic then Eryn is bellyless. Eryn is not mythologic.", "logic": "\nMythologic(eryn)\nUndigested(eryn)\nCyclonic(eryn)\nCatholic(eryn)\nBellyless(eryn)\nCensored(eryn)\nHindermost(eryn)\nforall x (Bellyless(x) and Cyclonic(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Cyclonic(x) -> Catholic(x))\nMythologic(eryn) -> Bellyless(eryn)\n\nnot Mythologic(eryn)\n\ntherefore Mythologic(eryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6585"} {"premises": "The adaline is exothermic. The adaline abet the manish. The adaline salinate the manish. The adaline salinate the fred. The adaline crosshatch the manish. The adaline crosshatch the fred. The manish abet the adaline. The manish abet the fred. The manish crosshatch the adaline. The fred is condign. The fred is brachial. The fred abet the adaline. The fred abet the manish. The fred salinate the manish. The fred crosshatch the adaline. If the manish is antigenic and the manish salinate the fred then the fred salinate the manish. If someone crosshatch the adaline then the adaline salinate the manish. If someone salinate the fred then they need the fred. The manish abet the adaline.", "logic": "\nExothermic(adaline)\nAbet(adaline, manish)\nSalinate(adaline, manish)\nSalinate(adaline, fred)\nCrosshatch(adaline, manish)\nCrosshatch(adaline, fred)\nAbet(manish, adaline)\nAbet(manish, fred)\nCrosshatch(manish, adaline)\nCondign(fred)\nBrachial(fred)\nAbet(fred, adaline)\nAbet(fred, manish)\nSalinate(fred, manish)\nCrosshatch(fred, adaline)\nAntigenic(manish) and Salinate(manish, fred) -> Salinate(fred, manish)\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, adaline) -> Salinate(adaline, manish))\nforall x (Salinate(x, fred) -> Abet(x, fred))\n\nAbet(manish, adaline)\n\ntherefore Abet(manish, adaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The benjamin is phreatic. The benjamin spoon the rae. The benjamin antedate the rae. The benjamin antedate the ronna. The benjamin anchor the rae. The benjamin anchor the ronna. The rae spoon the benjamin. The rae spoon the ronna. The rae anchor the benjamin. The ronna is gradual. The ronna is hesperian. The ronna spoon the benjamin. The ronna spoon the rae. The ronna antedate the rae. The ronna anchor the benjamin. If the rae is hypnotic and the rae antedate the ronna then the ronna antedate the rae. If someone anchor the benjamin then the benjamin antedate the rae. If someone antedate the ronna then they need the ronna. The benjamin does not see the ronna.", "logic": "\nPhreatic(benjamin)\nSpoon(benjamin, rae)\nAntedate(benjamin, rae)\nAntedate(benjamin, ronna)\nAnchor(benjamin, rae)\nAnchor(benjamin, ronna)\nSpoon(rae, benjamin)\nSpoon(rae, ronna)\nAnchor(rae, benjamin)\nGradual(ronna)\nHesperian(ronna)\nSpoon(ronna, benjamin)\nSpoon(ronna, rae)\nAntedate(ronna, rae)\nAnchor(ronna, benjamin)\nHypnotic(rae) and Antedate(rae, ronna) -> Antedate(ronna, rae)\nforall x (Anchor(x, benjamin) -> Antedate(benjamin, rae))\nforall x (Antedate(x, ronna) -> Spoon(x, ronna))\n\nnot Antedate(benjamin, ronna)\n\ntherefore Antedate(benjamin, ronna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The westleigh is untold. The westleigh topple the kirsten. The westleigh syringe the kirsten. The westleigh syringe the leandra. The westleigh relish the kirsten. The westleigh relish the leandra. The kirsten topple the westleigh. The kirsten topple the leandra. The kirsten relish the westleigh. The leandra is lobed. The leandra is embonpoint. The leandra topple the westleigh. The leandra topple the kirsten. The leandra syringe the kirsten. The leandra relish the westleigh. If the kirsten is kindled and the kirsten syringe the leandra then the leandra syringe the kirsten. If someone relish the westleigh then the westleigh syringe the kirsten. If someone syringe the leandra then they need the leandra. The westleigh topple the leandra.", "logic": "\nUntold(westleigh)\nTopple(westleigh, kirsten)\nSyringe(westleigh, kirsten)\nSyringe(westleigh, leandra)\nRelish(westleigh, kirsten)\nRelish(westleigh, leandra)\nTopple(kirsten, westleigh)\nTopple(kirsten, leandra)\nRelish(kirsten, westleigh)\nLobed(leandra)\nEmbonpoint(leandra)\nTopple(leandra, westleigh)\nTopple(leandra, kirsten)\nSyringe(leandra, kirsten)\nRelish(leandra, westleigh)\nKindled(kirsten) and Syringe(kirsten, leandra) -> Syringe(leandra, kirsten)\nforall x (Relish(x, westleigh) -> Syringe(westleigh, kirsten))\nforall x (Syringe(x, leandra) -> Topple(x, leandra))\n\nTopple(westleigh, leandra)\n\nSyringe(westleigh, leandra) and forall x (Syringe(x, leandra) -> Topple(x, leandra)) -> therefore Topple(westleigh, leandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The zed is caucasian. The zed acetylise the jerrylee. The zed whelk the jerrylee. The zed whelk the willette. The zed paper the jerrylee. The zed paper the willette. The jerrylee acetylise the zed. The jerrylee acetylise the willette. The jerrylee paper the zed. The willette is symbiotic. The willette is untanned. The willette acetylise the zed. The willette acetylise the jerrylee. The willette whelk the jerrylee. The willette paper the zed. If the jerrylee is enraged and the jerrylee whelk the willette then the willette whelk the jerrylee. If someone paper the zed then the zed whelk the jerrylee. If someone whelk the willette then they need the willette. The zed does not need the willette.", "logic": "\nCaucasian(zed)\nAcetylise(zed, jerrylee)\nWhelk(zed, jerrylee)\nWhelk(zed, willette)\nPaper(zed, jerrylee)\nPaper(zed, willette)\nAcetylise(jerrylee, zed)\nAcetylise(jerrylee, willette)\nPaper(jerrylee, zed)\nSymbiotic(willette)\nUntanned(willette)\nAcetylise(willette, zed)\nAcetylise(willette, jerrylee)\nWhelk(willette, jerrylee)\nPaper(willette, zed)\nEnraged(jerrylee) and Whelk(jerrylee, willette) -> Whelk(willette, jerrylee)\nforall x (Paper(x, zed) -> Whelk(zed, jerrylee))\nforall x (Whelk(x, willette) -> Acetylise(x, willette))\n\nnot Acetylise(zed, willette)\n\nWhelk(zed, willette) and forall x (Whelk(x, willette) -> Acetylise(x, willette)) -> therefore Acetylise(zed, willette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The olin is reinforced. The olin hygienize the timothea. The olin snuggle the timothea. The olin snuggle the giordano. The olin fuck the timothea. The olin fuck the giordano. The timothea hygienize the olin. The timothea hygienize the giordano. The timothea fuck the olin. The giordano is mancunian. The giordano is evidential. The giordano hygienize the olin. The giordano hygienize the timothea. The giordano snuggle the timothea. The giordano fuck the olin. If the timothea is chief and the timothea snuggle the giordano then the giordano snuggle the timothea. If someone fuck the olin then the olin snuggle the timothea. If someone snuggle the giordano then they need the giordano. The giordano does not need the giordano.", "logic": "\nReinforced(olin)\nHygienize(olin, timothea)\nSnuggle(olin, timothea)\nSnuggle(olin, giordano)\nFuck(olin, timothea)\nFuck(olin, giordano)\nHygienize(timothea, olin)\nHygienize(timothea, giordano)\nFuck(timothea, olin)\nMancunian(giordano)\nEvidential(giordano)\nHygienize(giordano, olin)\nHygienize(giordano, timothea)\nSnuggle(giordano, timothea)\nFuck(giordano, olin)\nChief(timothea) and Snuggle(timothea, giordano) -> Snuggle(giordano, timothea)\nforall x (Fuck(x, olin) -> Snuggle(olin, timothea))\nforall x (Snuggle(x, giordano) -> Hygienize(x, giordano))\n\nnot Hygienize(giordano, giordano)\n\nforall x (Snuggle(x, giordano) -> Hygienize(x, giordano)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The geoffry is broadleaf. The geoffry trench the christyna. The geoffry hobnob the christyna. The geoffry hobnob the yankee. The geoffry guard the christyna. The geoffry guard the yankee. The christyna trench the geoffry. The christyna trench the yankee. The christyna guard the geoffry. The yankee is doomed. The yankee is unreactive. The yankee trench the geoffry. The yankee trench the christyna. The yankee hobnob the christyna. The yankee guard the geoffry. If the christyna is regimental and the christyna hobnob the yankee then the yankee hobnob the christyna. If someone guard the geoffry then the geoffry hobnob the christyna. If someone hobnob the yankee then they need the yankee. The yankee hobnob the geoffry.", "logic": "\nBroadleaf(geoffry)\nTrench(geoffry, christyna)\nHobnob(geoffry, christyna)\nHobnob(geoffry, yankee)\nGuard(geoffry, christyna)\nGuard(geoffry, yankee)\nTrench(christyna, geoffry)\nTrench(christyna, yankee)\nGuard(christyna, geoffry)\nDoomed(yankee)\nUnreactive(yankee)\nTrench(yankee, geoffry)\nTrench(yankee, christyna)\nHobnob(yankee, christyna)\nGuard(yankee, geoffry)\nRegimental(christyna) and Hobnob(christyna, yankee) -> Hobnob(yankee, christyna)\nforall x (Guard(x, geoffry) -> Hobnob(geoffry, christyna))\nforall x (Hobnob(x, yankee) -> Trench(x, yankee))\n\nHobnob(yankee, geoffry)\n\nHobnob(yankee, geoffry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The laurance is tumid. The laurance keratinize the hank. The laurance irrupt the hank. The laurance irrupt the micky. The laurance fool the hank. The laurance fool the micky. The hank keratinize the laurance. The hank keratinize the micky. The hank fool the laurance. The micky is graphic. The micky is calendered. The micky keratinize the laurance. The micky keratinize the hank. The micky irrupt the hank. The micky fool the laurance. If the hank is goofy and the hank irrupt the micky then the micky irrupt the hank. If someone fool the laurance then the laurance irrupt the hank. If someone irrupt the micky then they need the micky. The micky is not tumid.", "logic": "\nTumid(laurance)\nKeratinize(laurance, hank)\nIrrupt(laurance, hank)\nIrrupt(laurance, micky)\nFool(laurance, hank)\nFool(laurance, micky)\nKeratinize(hank, laurance)\nKeratinize(hank, micky)\nFool(hank, laurance)\nGraphic(micky)\nCalendered(micky)\nKeratinize(micky, laurance)\nKeratinize(micky, hank)\nIrrupt(micky, hank)\nFool(micky, laurance)\nGoofy(hank) and Irrupt(hank, micky) -> Irrupt(micky, hank)\nforall x (Fool(x, laurance) -> Irrupt(laurance, hank))\nforall x (Irrupt(x, micky) -> Keratinize(x, micky))\n\nnot Tumid(micky)\n\nnot Tumid(micky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The miles is cardboard. The miles abominate the anallise. The miles handwrite the anallise. The miles handwrite the lionello. The miles intromit the anallise. The miles intromit the lionello. The anallise abominate the miles. The anallise abominate the lionello. The anallise intromit the miles. The lionello is pronged. The lionello is jacobean. The lionello abominate the miles. The lionello abominate the anallise. The lionello handwrite the anallise. The lionello intromit the miles. If the anallise is birchen and the anallise handwrite the lionello then the lionello handwrite the anallise. If someone intromit the miles then the miles handwrite the anallise. If someone handwrite the lionello then they need the lionello. The lionello intromit the lionello.", "logic": "\nCardboard(miles)\nAbominate(miles, anallise)\nHandwrite(miles, anallise)\nHandwrite(miles, lionello)\nIntromit(miles, anallise)\nIntromit(miles, lionello)\nAbominate(anallise, miles)\nAbominate(anallise, lionello)\nIntromit(anallise, miles)\nPronged(lionello)\nJacobean(lionello)\nAbominate(lionello, miles)\nAbominate(lionello, anallise)\nHandwrite(lionello, anallise)\nIntromit(lionello, miles)\nBirchen(anallise) and Handwrite(anallise, lionello) -> Handwrite(lionello, anallise)\nforall x (Intromit(x, miles) -> Handwrite(miles, anallise))\nforall x (Handwrite(x, lionello) -> Abominate(x, lionello))\n\nIntromit(lionello, lionello)\n\nIntromit(lionello, lionello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2776"} {"premises": "The margret golf the moore. The laurens golf the margret. The laurens golf the delmar. The laurens imprint the margret. The delmar tonsure the margret. The moore is septrional. The moore imprint the delmar. If something golf the delmar then it tonsure the margret. The laurens golf the delmar.", "logic": "\nGolf(margret, moore)\nGolf(laurens, margret)\nGolf(laurens, delmar)\nImprint(laurens, margret)\nTonsure(delmar, margret)\nSeptrional(moore)\nImprint(moore, delmar)\nforall x (Golf(x, delmar) -> Tonsure(x, margret))\n\nGolf(laurens, delmar)\n\ntherefore Golf(laurens, delmar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "The felisha rubricate the rick. The spud rubricate the felisha. The spud rubricate the vickie. The spud terrify the felisha. The vickie comprehend the felisha. The rick is fitted. The rick terrify the vickie. If something rubricate the vickie then it comprehend the felisha. The spud does not eat the vickie.", "logic": "\nRubricate(felisha, rick)\nRubricate(spud, felisha)\nRubricate(spud, vickie)\nTerrify(spud, felisha)\nComprehend(vickie, felisha)\nFitted(rick)\nTerrify(rick, vickie)\nforall x (Rubricate(x, vickie) -> Comprehend(x, felisha))\n\nnot Rubricate(spud, vickie)\n\ntherefore Rubricate(spud, vickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "The amadeus signalise the dea. The roxi signalise the amadeus. The roxi signalise the kristal. The roxi perfume the amadeus. The kristal modernise the amadeus. The dea is incidental. The dea perfume the kristal. If something signalise the kristal then it modernise the amadeus. The roxi modernise the amadeus.", "logic": "\nSignalise(amadeus, dea)\nSignalise(roxi, amadeus)\nSignalise(roxi, kristal)\nPerfume(roxi, amadeus)\nModernise(kristal, amadeus)\nIncidental(dea)\nPerfume(dea, kristal)\nforall x (Signalise(x, kristal) -> Modernise(x, amadeus))\n\nModernise(roxi, amadeus)\n\nSignalise(roxi, kristal) and forall x (Signalise(x, kristal) -> Modernise(x, amadeus)) -> therefore Modernise(roxi, amadeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "The hartwell brecciate the franky. The julietta brecciate the hartwell. The julietta brecciate the frederic. The julietta misdeal the hartwell. The frederic appose the hartwell. The franky is ceaseless. The franky misdeal the frederic. If something brecciate the frederic then it appose the hartwell. The julietta does not need the hartwell.", "logic": "\nBrecciate(hartwell, franky)\nBrecciate(julietta, hartwell)\nBrecciate(julietta, frederic)\nMisdeal(julietta, hartwell)\nAppose(frederic, hartwell)\nCeaseless(franky)\nMisdeal(franky, frederic)\nforall x (Brecciate(x, frederic) -> Appose(x, hartwell))\n\nnot Appose(julietta, hartwell)\n\nBrecciate(julietta, frederic) and forall x (Brecciate(x, frederic) -> Appose(x, hartwell)) -> therefore Appose(julietta, hartwell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "The dalton love the felicle. The carleigh love the dalton. The carleigh love the cassy. The carleigh transduce the dalton. The cassy automate the dalton. The felicle is hebraic. The felicle transduce the cassy. If something love the cassy then it automate the dalton. The felicle does not need the dalton.", "logic": "\nLove(dalton, felicle)\nLove(carleigh, dalton)\nLove(carleigh, cassy)\nTransduce(carleigh, dalton)\nAutomate(cassy, dalton)\nHebraic(felicle)\nTransduce(felicle, cassy)\nforall x (Love(x, cassy) -> Automate(x, dalton))\n\nnot Automate(felicle, dalton)\n\nforall x (Love(x, cassy) -> Automate(x, dalton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "The harriet ankylose the loraine. The tabina ankylose the harriet. The tabina ankylose the britney. The tabina founder the harriet. The britney propel the harriet. The loraine is ranking. The loraine founder the britney. If something ankylose the britney then it propel the harriet. The harriet propel the harriet.", "logic": "\nAnkylose(harriet, loraine)\nAnkylose(tabina, harriet)\nAnkylose(tabina, britney)\nFounder(tabina, harriet)\nPropel(britney, harriet)\nRanking(loraine)\nFounder(loraine, britney)\nforall x (Ankylose(x, britney) -> Propel(x, harriet))\n\nPropel(harriet, harriet)\n\nforall x (Ankylose(x, britney) -> Propel(x, harriet)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "The irma quickstep the zelma. The hagan quickstep the irma. The hagan quickstep the sarene. The hagan decoke the irma. The sarene flame the irma. The zelma is orotund. The zelma decoke the sarene. If something quickstep the sarene then it flame the irma. The zelma is not green.", "logic": "\nQuickstep(irma, zelma)\nQuickstep(hagan, irma)\nQuickstep(hagan, sarene)\nDecoke(hagan, irma)\nFlame(sarene, irma)\nOrotund(zelma)\nDecoke(zelma, sarene)\nforall x (Quickstep(x, sarene) -> Flame(x, irma))\n\nnot Green(zelma)\n\nnot Green(zelma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "The callie tailor the blanche. The davida tailor the callie. The davida tailor the tamara. The davida horsewhip the callie. The tamara deaden the callie. The blanche is separable. The blanche horsewhip the tamara. If something tailor the tamara then it deaden the callie. The callie tailor the tamara.", "logic": "\nTailor(callie, blanche)\nTailor(davida, callie)\nTailor(davida, tamara)\nHorsewhip(davida, callie)\nDeaden(tamara, callie)\nSeparable(blanche)\nHorsewhip(blanche, tamara)\nforall x (Tailor(x, tamara) -> Deaden(x, callie))\n\nTailor(callie, tamara)\n\nTailor(callie, tamara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1548"} {"premises": "Wynton is oozing. Wynton is natural. Gabie is catholic. Blue people are algebraic. All aggregated people are oozing. All goofy, catholic people are algebraic. If Wynton is pitchy then Wynton is aggregated. If someone is algebraic and goofy then they are natural. If Gabie is oozing then Gabie is algebraic. Wynton is oozing.", "logic": "\nOozing(wynton)\nNatural(wynton)\nCatholic(gabie)\nforall x (Catholic(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Oozing(x))\nforall x (Goofy(x) and Catholic(x) -> Algebraic(x))\nPitchy(wynton) -> Aggregated(wynton)\nforall x (Algebraic(x) and Goofy(x) -> Natural(x))\nOozing(gabie) -> Algebraic(gabie)\n\nOozing(wynton)\n\ntherefore Oozing(wynton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3876"} {"premises": "Rahel is patronless. Rahel is amebous. Josey is bareheaded. Blue people are torpid. All gargantuan people are patronless. All native, bareheaded people are torpid. If Rahel is numinous then Rahel is gargantuan. If someone is torpid and native then they are amebous. If Josey is patronless then Josey is torpid. Rahel is not amebous.", "logic": "\nPatronless(rahel)\nAmebous(rahel)\nBareheaded(josey)\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) -> Torpid(x))\nforall x (Gargantuan(x) -> Patronless(x))\nforall x (Native(x) and Bareheaded(x) -> Torpid(x))\nNuminous(rahel) -> Gargantuan(rahel)\nforall x (Torpid(x) and Native(x) -> Amebous(x))\nPatronless(josey) -> Torpid(josey)\n\nnot Amebous(rahel)\n\ntherefore Amebous(rahel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3876"} {"premises": "Tova is sectorial. Tova is hadal. Dulci is afoul. Blue people are inanimate. All hominine people are sectorial. All resettled, afoul people are inanimate. If Tova is capitulary then Tova is hominine. If someone is inanimate and resettled then they are hadal. If Dulci is sectorial then Dulci is inanimate. Dulci is not hadal.", "logic": "\nSectorial(tova)\nHadal(tova)\nAfoul(dulci)\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Inanimate(x))\nforall x (Hominine(x) -> Sectorial(x))\nforall x (Resettled(x) and Afoul(x) -> Inanimate(x))\nCapitulary(tova) -> Hominine(tova)\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Resettled(x) -> Hadal(x))\nSectorial(dulci) -> Inanimate(dulci)\n\nnot Hadal(dulci)\n\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Resettled(x) -> Hadal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3876"} {"premises": "Abagail is stomatal. Abagail is unsyllabic. Tamera is aeolian. Blue people are bigeneric. All anaemic people are stomatal. All axonal, aeolian people are bigeneric. If Abagail is fickle then Abagail is anaemic. If someone is bigeneric and axonal then they are unsyllabic. If Tamera is stomatal then Tamera is bigeneric. Tamera is anaemic.", "logic": "\nStomatal(abagail)\nUnsyllabic(abagail)\nAeolian(tamera)\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Stomatal(x))\nforall x (Axonal(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nFickle(abagail) -> Anaemic(abagail)\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Axonal(x) -> Unsyllabic(x))\nStomatal(tamera) -> Bigeneric(tamera)\n\nAnaemic(tamera)\n\nAnaemic(tamera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3876"} {"premises": "The matt is titular. The appolonia fulfill the shantee. The minta reecho the matt. The shantee thwack the minta. If something fulfill the appolonia and the appolonia is peaceable then it thwack the minta. If something thwack the matt and it is stable then it reecho the appolonia. If something fulfill the matt then it is breezy. If something is verbose then it thwack the minta. If something reecho the minta then it is verbose. If something is breezy and it thwack the shantee then it fulfill the appolonia. If something reecho the matt then it reecho the minta. If something thwack the matt then the matt thwack the shantee. The shantee thwack the minta.", "logic": "\nTitular(matt)\nFulfill(appolonia, shantee)\nReecho(minta, matt)\nThwack(shantee, minta)\nforall x (Fulfill(x, appolonia) and Peaceable(appolonia) -> Thwack(x, minta))\nforall x (Thwack(x, matt) and Stable(x) -> Reecho(x, appolonia))\nforall x (Fulfill(x, matt) -> Breezy(x))\nforall x (Verbose(x) -> Thwack(x, minta))\nforall x (Reecho(x, minta) -> Verbose(x))\nforall x (Breezy(x) and Thwack(x, shantee) -> Fulfill(x, appolonia))\nforall x (Reecho(x, matt) -> Reecho(x, minta))\nforall x (Thwack(x, matt) -> Thwack(matt, shantee))\n\nThwack(shantee, minta)\n\ntherefore Thwack(shantee, minta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The jacklyn is uniformed. The heloise convoy the rosanne. The amber nucleate the jacklyn. The rosanne decide the amber. If something convoy the heloise and the heloise is sapiential then it decide the amber. If something decide the jacklyn and it is given then it nucleate the heloise. If something convoy the jacklyn then it is ampullary. If something is arched then it decide the amber. If something nucleate the amber then it is arched. If something is ampullary and it decide the rosanne then it convoy the heloise. If something nucleate the jacklyn then it nucleate the amber. If something decide the jacklyn then the jacklyn decide the rosanne. The rosanne does not like the amber.", "logic": "\nUniformed(jacklyn)\nConvoy(heloise, rosanne)\nNucleate(amber, jacklyn)\nDecide(rosanne, amber)\nforall x (Convoy(x, heloise) and Sapiential(heloise) -> Decide(x, amber))\nforall x (Decide(x, jacklyn) and Given(x) -> Nucleate(x, heloise))\nforall x (Convoy(x, jacklyn) -> Ampullary(x))\nforall x (Arched(x) -> Decide(x, amber))\nforall x (Nucleate(x, amber) -> Arched(x))\nforall x (Ampullary(x) and Decide(x, rosanne) -> Convoy(x, heloise))\nforall x (Nucleate(x, jacklyn) -> Nucleate(x, amber))\nforall x (Decide(x, jacklyn) -> Decide(jacklyn, rosanne))\n\nnot Decide(rosanne, amber)\n\ntherefore Decide(rosanne, amber)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The dorey is bearable. The faythe conk the boniface. The niels quiver the dorey. The boniface induce the niels. If something conk the faythe and the faythe is somnolent then it induce the niels. If something induce the dorey and it is beamish then it quiver the faythe. If something conk the dorey then it is retracted. If something is unhealthy then it induce the niels. If something quiver the niels then it is unhealthy. If something is retracted and it induce the boniface then it conk the faythe. If something quiver the dorey then it quiver the niels. If something induce the dorey then the dorey induce the boniface. The niels quiver the niels.", "logic": "\nBearable(dorey)\nConk(faythe, boniface)\nQuiver(niels, dorey)\nInduce(boniface, niels)\nforall x (Conk(x, faythe) and Somnolent(faythe) -> Induce(x, niels))\nforall x (Induce(x, dorey) and Beamish(x) -> Quiver(x, faythe))\nforall x (Conk(x, dorey) -> Retracted(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Induce(x, niels))\nforall x (Quiver(x, niels) -> Unhealthy(x))\nforall x (Retracted(x) and Induce(x, boniface) -> Conk(x, faythe))\nforall x (Quiver(x, dorey) -> Quiver(x, niels))\nforall x (Induce(x, dorey) -> Induce(dorey, boniface))\n\nQuiver(niels, niels)\n\nQuiver(niels, dorey) and forall x (Quiver(x, dorey) -> Quiver(x, niels)) -> therefore Quiver(niels, niels)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The whittaker is regional. The tammi callous the angelo. The gabriel mount the whittaker. The angelo climax the gabriel. If something callous the tammi and the tammi is unlittered then it climax the gabriel. If something climax the whittaker and it is voluptuous then it mount the tammi. If something callous the whittaker then it is belittled. If something is segmented then it climax the gabriel. If something mount the gabriel then it is segmented. If something is belittled and it climax the angelo then it callous the tammi. If something mount the whittaker then it mount the gabriel. If something climax the whittaker then the whittaker climax the angelo. The gabriel does not visit the gabriel.", "logic": "\nRegional(whittaker)\nCallous(tammi, angelo)\nMount(gabriel, whittaker)\nClimax(angelo, gabriel)\nforall x (Callous(x, tammi) and Unlittered(tammi) -> Climax(x, gabriel))\nforall x (Climax(x, whittaker) and Voluptuous(x) -> Mount(x, tammi))\nforall x (Callous(x, whittaker) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Segmented(x) -> Climax(x, gabriel))\nforall x (Mount(x, gabriel) -> Segmented(x))\nforall x (Belittled(x) and Climax(x, angelo) -> Callous(x, tammi))\nforall x (Mount(x, whittaker) -> Mount(x, gabriel))\nforall x (Climax(x, whittaker) -> Climax(whittaker, angelo))\n\nnot Mount(gabriel, gabriel)\n\nMount(gabriel, whittaker) and forall x (Mount(x, whittaker) -> Mount(x, gabriel)) -> therefore Mount(gabriel, gabriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The charmain is myotonic. The clemmy truncate the witty. The theodor worship the charmain. The witty diffuse the theodor. If something truncate the clemmy and the clemmy is stupendous then it diffuse the theodor. If something diffuse the charmain and it is estranged then it worship the clemmy. If something truncate the charmain then it is fimbriate. If something is endodontic then it diffuse the theodor. If something worship the theodor then it is endodontic. If something is fimbriate and it diffuse the witty then it truncate the clemmy. If something worship the charmain then it worship the theodor. If something diffuse the charmain then the charmain diffuse the witty. The theodor is endodontic.", "logic": "\nMyotonic(charmain)\nTruncate(clemmy, witty)\nWorship(theodor, charmain)\nDiffuse(witty, theodor)\nforall x (Truncate(x, clemmy) and Stupendous(clemmy) -> Diffuse(x, theodor))\nforall x (Diffuse(x, charmain) and Estranged(x) -> Worship(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Truncate(x, charmain) -> Fimbriate(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) -> Diffuse(x, theodor))\nforall x (Worship(x, theodor) -> Endodontic(x))\nforall x (Fimbriate(x) and Diffuse(x, witty) -> Truncate(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Worship(x, charmain) -> Worship(x, theodor))\nforall x (Diffuse(x, charmain) -> Diffuse(charmain, witty))\n\nEndodontic(theodor)\n\nWorship(theodor, charmain) and forall x (Worship(x, charmain) -> Worship(x, theodor)) -> therefore Worship(theodor, theodor) Worship(theodor, theodor) and forall x (Worship(x, theodor) -> Endodontic(x)) -> therefore Endodontic(theodor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The ilyse is gawky. The alena hoot the caria. The gwyneth adumbrate the ilyse. The caria benefice the gwyneth. If something hoot the alena and the alena is veinlike then it benefice the gwyneth. If something benefice the ilyse and it is auctorial then it adumbrate the alena. If something hoot the ilyse then it is salaried. If something is sulfurous then it benefice the gwyneth. If something adumbrate the gwyneth then it is sulfurous. If something is salaried and it benefice the caria then it hoot the alena. If something adumbrate the ilyse then it adumbrate the gwyneth. If something benefice the ilyse then the ilyse benefice the caria. The gwyneth is not sulfurous.", "logic": "\nGawky(ilyse)\nHoot(alena, caria)\nAdumbrate(gwyneth, ilyse)\nBenefice(caria, gwyneth)\nforall x (Hoot(x, alena) and Veinlike(alena) -> Benefice(x, gwyneth))\nforall x (Benefice(x, ilyse) and Auctorial(x) -> Adumbrate(x, alena))\nforall x (Hoot(x, ilyse) -> Salaried(x))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Benefice(x, gwyneth))\nforall x (Adumbrate(x, gwyneth) -> Sulfurous(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) and Benefice(x, caria) -> Hoot(x, alena))\nforall x (Adumbrate(x, ilyse) -> Adumbrate(x, gwyneth))\nforall x (Benefice(x, ilyse) -> Benefice(ilyse, caria))\n\nnot Sulfurous(gwyneth)\n\nAdumbrate(gwyneth, ilyse) and forall x (Adumbrate(x, ilyse) -> Adumbrate(x, gwyneth)) -> therefore Adumbrate(gwyneth, gwyneth) Adumbrate(gwyneth, gwyneth) and forall x (Adumbrate(x, gwyneth) -> Sulfurous(x)) -> therefore Sulfurous(gwyneth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The bevvy is quenched. The madelle scribble the lia. The mikey mentor the bevvy. The lia encode the mikey. If something scribble the madelle and the madelle is writhing then it encode the mikey. If something encode the bevvy and it is pickled then it mentor the madelle. If something scribble the bevvy then it is twinkling. If something is diarrheal then it encode the mikey. If something mentor the mikey then it is diarrheal. If something is twinkling and it encode the lia then it scribble the madelle. If something mentor the bevvy then it mentor the mikey. If something encode the bevvy then the bevvy encode the lia. The mikey encode the mikey.", "logic": "\nQuenched(bevvy)\nScribble(madelle, lia)\nMentor(mikey, bevvy)\nEncode(lia, mikey)\nforall x (Scribble(x, madelle) and Writhing(madelle) -> Encode(x, mikey))\nforall x (Encode(x, bevvy) and Pickled(x) -> Mentor(x, madelle))\nforall x (Scribble(x, bevvy) -> Twinkling(x))\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) -> Encode(x, mikey))\nforall x (Mentor(x, mikey) -> Diarrheal(x))\nforall x (Twinkling(x) and Encode(x, lia) -> Scribble(x, madelle))\nforall x (Mentor(x, bevvy) -> Mentor(x, mikey))\nforall x (Encode(x, bevvy) -> Encode(bevvy, lia))\n\nEncode(mikey, mikey)\n\nMentor(mikey, bevvy) and forall x (Mentor(x, bevvy) -> Mentor(x, mikey)) -> therefore Mentor(mikey, mikey) Mentor(mikey, mikey) and forall x (Mentor(x, mikey) -> Diarrheal(x)) -> therefore Diarrheal(mikey) Diarrheal(mikey) and forall x (Diarrheal(x) -> Encode(x, mikey)) -> therefore Encode(mikey, mikey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The gisele is whopping. The carmelia green the kathrine. The carolina major the gisele. The kathrine bestialise the carolina. If something green the carmelia and the carmelia is cloze then it bestialise the carolina. If something bestialise the gisele and it is sealed then it major the carmelia. If something green the gisele then it is tripping. If something is semestral then it bestialise the carolina. If something major the carolina then it is semestral. If something is tripping and it bestialise the kathrine then it green the carmelia. If something major the gisele then it major the carolina. If something bestialise the gisele then the gisele bestialise the kathrine. The carolina does not like the carolina.", "logic": "\nWhopping(gisele)\nGreen(carmelia, kathrine)\nMajor(carolina, gisele)\nBestialise(kathrine, carolina)\nforall x (Green(x, carmelia) and Cloze(carmelia) -> Bestialise(x, carolina))\nforall x (Bestialise(x, gisele) and Sealed(x) -> Major(x, carmelia))\nforall x (Green(x, gisele) -> Tripping(x))\nforall x (Semestral(x) -> Bestialise(x, carolina))\nforall x (Major(x, carolina) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Tripping(x) and Bestialise(x, kathrine) -> Green(x, carmelia))\nforall x (Major(x, gisele) -> Major(x, carolina))\nforall x (Bestialise(x, gisele) -> Bestialise(gisele, kathrine))\n\nnot Bestialise(carolina, carolina)\n\nMajor(carolina, gisele) and forall x (Major(x, gisele) -> Major(x, carolina)) -> therefore Major(carolina, carolina) Major(carolina, carolina) and forall x (Major(x, carolina) -> Semestral(x)) -> therefore Semestral(carolina) Semestral(carolina) and forall x (Semestral(x) -> Bestialise(x, carolina)) -> therefore Bestialise(carolina, carolina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The klee is weensy. The damon whale the rea. The estella whang the klee. The rea decoct the estella. If something whale the damon and the damon is nightly then it decoct the estella. If something decoct the klee and it is jarring then it whang the damon. If something whale the klee then it is unraised. If something is right then it decoct the estella. If something whang the estella then it is right. If something is unraised and it decoct the rea then it whale the damon. If something whang the klee then it whang the estella. If something decoct the klee then the klee decoct the rea. The klee is not unraised.", "logic": "\nWeensy(klee)\nWhale(damon, rea)\nWhang(estella, klee)\nDecoct(rea, estella)\nforall x (Whale(x, damon) and Nightly(damon) -> Decoct(x, estella))\nforall x (Decoct(x, klee) and Jarring(x) -> Whang(x, damon))\nforall x (Whale(x, klee) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Right(x) -> Decoct(x, estella))\nforall x (Whang(x, estella) -> Right(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) and Decoct(x, rea) -> Whale(x, damon))\nforall x (Whang(x, klee) -> Whang(x, estella))\nforall x (Decoct(x, klee) -> Decoct(klee, rea))\n\nnot Unraised(klee)\n\nforall x (Whale(x, klee) -> Unraised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The florenza is insatiate. The friedrich diagram the dorry. The bridgette palter the florenza. The dorry french the bridgette. If something diagram the friedrich and the friedrich is unrigged then it french the bridgette. If something french the florenza and it is baptistic then it palter the friedrich. If something diagram the florenza then it is runty. If something is hiemal then it french the bridgette. If something palter the bridgette then it is hiemal. If something is runty and it french the dorry then it diagram the friedrich. If something palter the florenza then it palter the bridgette. If something french the florenza then the florenza french the dorry. The florenza french the bridgette.", "logic": "\nInsatiate(florenza)\nDiagram(friedrich, dorry)\nPalter(bridgette, florenza)\nFrench(dorry, bridgette)\nforall x (Diagram(x, friedrich) and Unrigged(friedrich) -> French(x, bridgette))\nforall x (French(x, florenza) and Baptistic(x) -> Palter(x, friedrich))\nforall x (Diagram(x, florenza) -> Runty(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> French(x, bridgette))\nforall x (Palter(x, bridgette) -> Hiemal(x))\nforall x (Runty(x) and French(x, dorry) -> Diagram(x, friedrich))\nforall x (Palter(x, florenza) -> Palter(x, bridgette))\nforall x (French(x, florenza) -> French(florenza, dorry))\n\nFrench(florenza, bridgette)\n\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> French(x, bridgette)) <- forall x (Palter(x, bridgette) -> Hiemal(x)) <- forall x (Palter(x, florenza) -> Palter(x, bridgette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The darian is bearing. The lezlie hold the madonna. The daffie sexualise the darian. The madonna agree the daffie. If something hold the lezlie and the lezlie is estuarial then it agree the daffie. If something agree the darian and it is sensory then it sexualise the lezlie. If something hold the darian then it is unpierced. If something is yeastlike then it agree the daffie. If something sexualise the daffie then it is yeastlike. If something is unpierced and it agree the madonna then it hold the lezlie. If something sexualise the darian then it sexualise the daffie. If something agree the darian then the darian agree the madonna. The darian does not like the madonna.", "logic": "\nBearing(darian)\nHold(lezlie, madonna)\nSexualise(daffie, darian)\nAgree(madonna, daffie)\nforall x (Hold(x, lezlie) and Estuarial(lezlie) -> Agree(x, daffie))\nforall x (Agree(x, darian) and Sensory(x) -> Sexualise(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Hold(x, darian) -> Unpierced(x))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Agree(x, daffie))\nforall x (Sexualise(x, daffie) -> Yeastlike(x))\nforall x (Unpierced(x) and Agree(x, madonna) -> Hold(x, lezlie))\nforall x (Sexualise(x, darian) -> Sexualise(x, daffie))\nforall x (Agree(x, darian) -> Agree(darian, madonna))\n\nnot Agree(darian, madonna)\n\nforall x (Agree(x, darian) -> Agree(darian, madonna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The marwin is specious. The gabbi canker the deanne. The sabine fester the marwin. The deanne fustigate the sabine. If something canker the gabbi and the gabbi is goodish then it fustigate the sabine. If something fustigate the marwin and it is reddened then it fester the gabbi. If something canker the marwin then it is sulphurous. If something is elemental then it fustigate the sabine. If something fester the sabine then it is elemental. If something is sulphurous and it fustigate the deanne then it canker the gabbi. If something fester the marwin then it fester the sabine. If something fustigate the marwin then the marwin fustigate the deanne. The gabbi is sulphurous.", "logic": "\nSpecious(marwin)\nCanker(gabbi, deanne)\nFester(sabine, marwin)\nFustigate(deanne, sabine)\nforall x (Canker(x, gabbi) and Goodish(gabbi) -> Fustigate(x, sabine))\nforall x (Fustigate(x, marwin) and Reddened(x) -> Fester(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Canker(x, marwin) -> Sulphurous(x))\nforall x (Elemental(x) -> Fustigate(x, sabine))\nforall x (Fester(x, sabine) -> Elemental(x))\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) and Fustigate(x, deanne) -> Canker(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Fester(x, marwin) -> Fester(x, sabine))\nforall x (Fustigate(x, marwin) -> Fustigate(marwin, deanne))\n\nSulphurous(gabbi)\n\nforall x (Canker(x, marwin) -> Sulphurous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The elwood is aurous. The elfrida placard the shilpa. The emylee cohere the elwood. The shilpa tincture the emylee. If something placard the elfrida and the elfrida is biconvex then it tincture the emylee. If something tincture the elwood and it is paradisaic then it cohere the elfrida. If something placard the elwood then it is feasible. If something is septuple then it tincture the emylee. If something cohere the emylee then it is septuple. If something is feasible and it tincture the shilpa then it placard the elfrida. If something cohere the elwood then it cohere the emylee. If something tincture the elwood then the elwood tincture the shilpa. The shilpa does not chase the shilpa.", "logic": "\nAurous(elwood)\nPlacard(elfrida, shilpa)\nCohere(emylee, elwood)\nTincture(shilpa, emylee)\nforall x (Placard(x, elfrida) and Biconvex(elfrida) -> Tincture(x, emylee))\nforall x (Tincture(x, elwood) and Paradisaic(x) -> Cohere(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Placard(x, elwood) -> Feasible(x))\nforall x (Septuple(x) -> Tincture(x, emylee))\nforall x (Cohere(x, emylee) -> Septuple(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) and Tincture(x, shilpa) -> Placard(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Cohere(x, elwood) -> Cohere(x, emylee))\nforall x (Tincture(x, elwood) -> Tincture(elwood, shilpa))\n\nnot Placard(shilpa, shilpa)\n\nnot Placard(shilpa, shilpa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The catie is migratory. The fredi besot the rock. The bernette impregnate the catie. The rock tremor the bernette. If something besot the fredi and the fredi is blameless then it tremor the bernette. If something tremor the catie and it is abyssal then it impregnate the fredi. If something besot the catie then it is accessory. If something is puerperal then it tremor the bernette. If something impregnate the bernette then it is puerperal. If something is accessory and it tremor the rock then it besot the fredi. If something impregnate the catie then it impregnate the bernette. If something tremor the catie then the catie tremor the rock. The bernette tremor the catie.", "logic": "\nMigratory(catie)\nBesot(fredi, rock)\nImpregnate(bernette, catie)\nTremor(rock, bernette)\nforall x (Besot(x, fredi) and Blameless(fredi) -> Tremor(x, bernette))\nforall x (Tremor(x, catie) and Abyssal(x) -> Impregnate(x, fredi))\nforall x (Besot(x, catie) -> Accessory(x))\nforall x (Puerperal(x) -> Tremor(x, bernette))\nforall x (Impregnate(x, bernette) -> Puerperal(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Tremor(x, rock) -> Besot(x, fredi))\nforall x (Impregnate(x, catie) -> Impregnate(x, bernette))\nforall x (Tremor(x, catie) -> Tremor(catie, rock))\n\nTremor(bernette, catie)\n\nTremor(bernette, catie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The charlott is smoggy. The giavani cotton the francisco. The abbot free the charlott. The francisco versify the abbot. If something cotton the giavani and the giavani is unfeasible then it versify the abbot. If something versify the charlott and it is fahrenheit then it free the giavani. If something cotton the charlott then it is anti. If something is peruked then it versify the abbot. If something free the abbot then it is peruked. If something is anti and it versify the francisco then it cotton the giavani. If something free the charlott then it free the abbot. If something versify the charlott then the charlott versify the francisco. The francisco does not chase the abbot.", "logic": "\nSmoggy(charlott)\nCotton(giavani, francisco)\nFree(abbot, charlott)\nVersify(francisco, abbot)\nforall x (Cotton(x, giavani) and Unfeasible(giavani) -> Versify(x, abbot))\nforall x (Versify(x, charlott) and Fahrenheit(x) -> Free(x, giavani))\nforall x (Cotton(x, charlott) -> Anti(x))\nforall x (Peruked(x) -> Versify(x, abbot))\nforall x (Free(x, abbot) -> Peruked(x))\nforall x (Anti(x) and Versify(x, francisco) -> Cotton(x, giavani))\nforall x (Free(x, charlott) -> Free(x, abbot))\nforall x (Versify(x, charlott) -> Versify(charlott, francisco))\n\nnot Cotton(francisco, abbot)\n\nnot Cotton(francisco, abbot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "The jeffery is paradisaic. The cordy sort the philly. The greggory satellite the jeffery. The philly encounter the greggory. If something sort the cordy and the cordy is gentle then it encounter the greggory. If something encounter the jeffery and it is pudendal then it satellite the cordy. If something sort the jeffery then it is spendable. If something is exculpated then it encounter the greggory. If something satellite the greggory then it is exculpated. If something is spendable and it encounter the philly then it sort the cordy. If something satellite the jeffery then it satellite the greggory. If something encounter the jeffery then the jeffery encounter the philly. The jeffery sort the jeffery.", "logic": "\nParadisaic(jeffery)\nSort(cordy, philly)\nSatellite(greggory, jeffery)\nEncounter(philly, greggory)\nforall x (Sort(x, cordy) and Gentle(cordy) -> Encounter(x, greggory))\nforall x (Encounter(x, jeffery) and Pudendal(x) -> Satellite(x, cordy))\nforall x (Sort(x, jeffery) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) -> Encounter(x, greggory))\nforall x (Satellite(x, greggory) -> Exculpated(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) and Encounter(x, philly) -> Sort(x, cordy))\nforall x (Satellite(x, jeffery) -> Satellite(x, greggory))\nforall x (Encounter(x, jeffery) -> Encounter(jeffery, philly))\n\nSort(jeffery, jeffery)\n\nSort(jeffery, jeffery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Gene is uptown. Gene is plenteous. Gene is vulvar. Gene is virginal. Gene is wailing. Gene is connatural. Gene is angelic. If something is plenteous then it is uptown. If Gene is virginal then Gene is wailing. If something is plenteous then it is vulvar. All plenteous, virginal things are angelic. If something is plenteous and virginal then it is wailing. Nice things are uptown. Gene is plenteous.", "logic": "\nUptown(gene)\nPlenteous(gene)\nVulvar(gene)\nVirginal(gene)\nWailing(gene)\nConnatural(gene)\nAngelic(gene)\nforall x (Plenteous(x) -> Uptown(x))\nVirginal(gene) -> Wailing(gene)\nforall x (Plenteous(x) -> Vulvar(x))\nforall x (Plenteous(x) and Virginal(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Plenteous(x) and Virginal(x) -> Wailing(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Uptown(x))\n\nPlenteous(gene)\n\ntherefore Plenteous(gene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2430"} {"premises": "Hersch is adenoid. Hersch is wysiwyg. Hersch is gassy. Hersch is ameban. Hersch is unlucky. Hersch is away. Hersch is slipshod. If something is wysiwyg then it is adenoid. If Hersch is ameban then Hersch is unlucky. If something is wysiwyg then it is gassy. All wysiwyg, ameban things are slipshod. If something is wysiwyg and ameban then it is unlucky. Nice things are adenoid. Hersch is not away.", "logic": "\nAdenoid(hersch)\nWysiwyg(hersch)\nGassy(hersch)\nAmeban(hersch)\nUnlucky(hersch)\nAway(hersch)\nSlipshod(hersch)\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) -> Adenoid(x))\nAmeban(hersch) -> Unlucky(hersch)\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) -> Gassy(x))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) and Ameban(x) -> Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) and Ameban(x) -> Unlucky(x))\nforall x (Ameban(x) -> Adenoid(x))\n\nnot Away(hersch)\n\ntherefore Away(hersch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2430"} {"premises": "The nichole bloviate the andrzej. The vlad is not adept. The andrzej does not eat the jeannette. The andrzej is nicaean. The andrzej bloviate the vlad. The jeannette stack the nichole. The jeannette is trapped. If the andrzej stack the jeannette then the jeannette is adept. If something stack the jeannette and the jeannette does not eat the nichole then the jeannette laden the nichole. If something laden the jeannette then the jeannette laden the nichole. If the jeannette stack the vlad and the jeannette laden the vlad then the jeannette laden the andrzej. If something laden the nichole and the nichole bloviate the andrzej then it stack the andrzej. If the andrzej is unreactive and the andrzej is biaxial then the andrzej laden the nichole. If something stack the nichole then it laden the jeannette. If the vlad is adept and the vlad does not like the jeannette then the jeannette bloviate the nichole. The jeannette is trapped.", "logic": "\nBloviate(nichole, andrzej)\nnot Adept(vlad)\nnot Stack(andrzej, jeannette)\nNicaean(andrzej)\nBloviate(andrzej, vlad)\nStack(jeannette, nichole)\nTrapped(jeannette)\nStack(andrzej, jeannette) -> Adept(jeannette)\nforall x (Stack(x, jeannette) and not Stack(jeannette, nichole) -> Laden(jeannette, nichole))\nforall x (Laden(x, jeannette) -> Laden(jeannette, nichole))\nStack(jeannette, vlad) and Laden(jeannette, vlad) -> Laden(jeannette, andrzej)\nforall x (Laden(x, nichole) and Bloviate(nichole, andrzej) -> Stack(x, andrzej))\nUnreactive(andrzej) and Biaxial(andrzej) -> Laden(andrzej, nichole)\nforall x (Stack(x, nichole) -> Laden(x, jeannette))\nAdept(vlad) and not Laden(vlad, jeannette) -> Bloviate(jeannette, nichole)\n\nTrapped(jeannette)\n\ntherefore Trapped(jeannette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The eleanor dilate the chrissie. The quigman is not diagonal. The chrissie does not eat the maurene. The chrissie is holophytic. The chrissie dilate the quigman. The maurene interject the eleanor. The maurene is gusseted. If the chrissie interject the maurene then the maurene is diagonal. If something interject the maurene and the maurene does not eat the eleanor then the maurene rival the eleanor. If something rival the maurene then the maurene rival the eleanor. If the maurene interject the quigman and the maurene rival the quigman then the maurene rival the chrissie. If something rival the eleanor and the eleanor dilate the chrissie then it interject the chrissie. If the chrissie is unpunished and the chrissie is warty then the chrissie rival the eleanor. If something interject the eleanor then it rival the maurene. If the quigman is diagonal and the quigman does not like the maurene then the maurene dilate the eleanor. The quigman is diagonal.", "logic": "\nDilate(eleanor, chrissie)\nnot Diagonal(quigman)\nnot Interject(chrissie, maurene)\nHolophytic(chrissie)\nDilate(chrissie, quigman)\nInterject(maurene, eleanor)\nGusseted(maurene)\nInterject(chrissie, maurene) -> Diagonal(maurene)\nforall x (Interject(x, maurene) and not Interject(maurene, eleanor) -> Rival(maurene, eleanor))\nforall x (Rival(x, maurene) -> Rival(maurene, eleanor))\nInterject(maurene, quigman) and Rival(maurene, quigman) -> Rival(maurene, chrissie)\nforall x (Rival(x, eleanor) and Dilate(eleanor, chrissie) -> Interject(x, chrissie))\nUnpunished(chrissie) and Warty(chrissie) -> Rival(chrissie, eleanor)\nforall x (Interject(x, eleanor) -> Rival(x, maurene))\nDiagonal(quigman) and not Rival(quigman, maurene) -> Dilate(maurene, eleanor)\n\nDiagonal(quigman)\n\ntherefore not Diagonal(quigman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The mollee blast the lancelot. The sibylla is not subversive. The lancelot does not eat the dorelia. The lancelot is sprawly. The lancelot blast the sibylla. The dorelia plunge the mollee. The dorelia is resinated. If the lancelot plunge the dorelia then the dorelia is subversive. If something plunge the dorelia and the dorelia does not eat the mollee then the dorelia exfoliate the mollee. If something exfoliate the dorelia then the dorelia exfoliate the mollee. If the dorelia plunge the sibylla and the dorelia exfoliate the sibylla then the dorelia exfoliate the lancelot. If something exfoliate the mollee and the mollee blast the lancelot then it plunge the lancelot. If the lancelot is together and the lancelot is worthy then the lancelot exfoliate the mollee. If something plunge the mollee then it exfoliate the dorelia. If the sibylla is subversive and the sibylla does not like the dorelia then the dorelia blast the mollee. The dorelia exfoliate the dorelia.", "logic": "\nBlast(mollee, lancelot)\nnot Subversive(sibylla)\nnot Plunge(lancelot, dorelia)\nSprawly(lancelot)\nBlast(lancelot, sibylla)\nPlunge(dorelia, mollee)\nResinated(dorelia)\nPlunge(lancelot, dorelia) -> Subversive(dorelia)\nforall x (Plunge(x, dorelia) and not Plunge(dorelia, mollee) -> Exfoliate(dorelia, mollee))\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, dorelia) -> Exfoliate(dorelia, mollee))\nPlunge(dorelia, sibylla) and Exfoliate(dorelia, sibylla) -> Exfoliate(dorelia, lancelot)\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, mollee) and Blast(mollee, lancelot) -> Plunge(x, lancelot))\nTogether(lancelot) and Worthy(lancelot) -> Exfoliate(lancelot, mollee)\nforall x (Plunge(x, mollee) -> Exfoliate(x, dorelia))\nSubversive(sibylla) and not Exfoliate(sibylla, dorelia) -> Blast(dorelia, mollee)\n\nExfoliate(dorelia, dorelia)\n\nPlunge(dorelia, mollee) and forall x (Plunge(x, mollee) -> Exfoliate(x, dorelia)) -> therefore Exfoliate(dorelia, dorelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The jobyna camp the ertha. The riva is not ecological. The ertha does not eat the elyse. The ertha is classy. The ertha camp the riva. The elyse shoehorn the jobyna. The elyse is immobile. If the ertha shoehorn the elyse then the elyse is ecological. If something shoehorn the elyse and the elyse does not eat the jobyna then the elyse parent the jobyna. If something parent the elyse then the elyse parent the jobyna. If the elyse shoehorn the riva and the elyse parent the riva then the elyse parent the ertha. If something parent the jobyna and the jobyna camp the ertha then it shoehorn the ertha. If the ertha is rushy and the ertha is acicular then the ertha parent the jobyna. If something shoehorn the jobyna then it parent the elyse. If the riva is ecological and the riva does not like the elyse then the elyse camp the jobyna. The elyse does not like the elyse.", "logic": "\nCamp(jobyna, ertha)\nnot Ecological(riva)\nnot Shoehorn(ertha, elyse)\nClassy(ertha)\nCamp(ertha, riva)\nShoehorn(elyse, jobyna)\nImmobile(elyse)\nShoehorn(ertha, elyse) -> Ecological(elyse)\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, elyse) and not Shoehorn(elyse, jobyna) -> Parent(elyse, jobyna))\nforall x (Parent(x, elyse) -> Parent(elyse, jobyna))\nShoehorn(elyse, riva) and Parent(elyse, riva) -> Parent(elyse, ertha)\nforall x (Parent(x, jobyna) and Camp(jobyna, ertha) -> Shoehorn(x, ertha))\nRushy(ertha) and Acicular(ertha) -> Parent(ertha, jobyna)\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, jobyna) -> Parent(x, elyse))\nEcological(riva) and not Parent(riva, elyse) -> Camp(elyse, jobyna)\n\nnot Parent(elyse, elyse)\n\nShoehorn(elyse, jobyna) and forall x (Shoehorn(x, jobyna) -> Parent(x, elyse)) -> therefore Parent(elyse, elyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The jereme defend the tami. The mahala is not tomentous. The tami does not eat the russell. The tami is varnished. The tami defend the mahala. The russell shoot the jereme. The russell is dosed. If the tami shoot the russell then the russell is tomentous. If something shoot the russell and the russell does not eat the jereme then the russell toddle the jereme. If something toddle the russell then the russell toddle the jereme. If the russell shoot the mahala and the russell toddle the mahala then the russell toddle the tami. If something toddle the jereme and the jereme defend the tami then it shoot the tami. If the tami is ictal and the tami is hydric then the tami toddle the jereme. If something shoot the jereme then it toddle the russell. If the mahala is tomentous and the mahala does not like the russell then the russell defend the jereme. The russell toddle the jereme.", "logic": "\nDefend(jereme, tami)\nnot Tomentous(mahala)\nnot Shoot(tami, russell)\nVarnished(tami)\nDefend(tami, mahala)\nShoot(russell, jereme)\nDosed(russell)\nShoot(tami, russell) -> Tomentous(russell)\nforall x (Shoot(x, russell) and not Shoot(russell, jereme) -> Toddle(russell, jereme))\nforall x (Toddle(x, russell) -> Toddle(russell, jereme))\nShoot(russell, mahala) and Toddle(russell, mahala) -> Toddle(russell, tami)\nforall x (Toddle(x, jereme) and Defend(jereme, tami) -> Shoot(x, tami))\nIctal(tami) and Hydric(tami) -> Toddle(tami, jereme)\nforall x (Shoot(x, jereme) -> Toddle(x, russell))\nTomentous(mahala) and not Toddle(mahala, russell) -> Defend(russell, jereme)\n\nToddle(russell, jereme)\n\nShoot(russell, jereme) and forall x (Shoot(x, jereme) -> Toddle(x, russell)) -> therefore Toddle(russell, russell) Toddle(russell, russell) and forall x (Toddle(x, russell) -> Toddle(russell, jereme)) -> therefore Toddle(russell, jereme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The wrennie warehouse the marylee. The skipton is not serial. The marylee does not eat the corabelle. The marylee is rusted. The marylee warehouse the skipton. The corabelle reorder the wrennie. The corabelle is dusty. If the marylee reorder the corabelle then the corabelle is serial. If something reorder the corabelle and the corabelle does not eat the wrennie then the corabelle spritz the wrennie. If something spritz the corabelle then the corabelle spritz the wrennie. If the corabelle reorder the skipton and the corabelle spritz the skipton then the corabelle spritz the marylee. If something spritz the wrennie and the wrennie warehouse the marylee then it reorder the marylee. If the marylee is voidable and the marylee is divisional then the marylee spritz the wrennie. If something reorder the wrennie then it spritz the corabelle. If the skipton is serial and the skipton does not like the corabelle then the corabelle warehouse the wrennie. The corabelle does not like the wrennie.", "logic": "\nWarehouse(wrennie, marylee)\nnot Serial(skipton)\nnot Reorder(marylee, corabelle)\nRusted(marylee)\nWarehouse(marylee, skipton)\nReorder(corabelle, wrennie)\nDusty(corabelle)\nReorder(marylee, corabelle) -> Serial(corabelle)\nforall x (Reorder(x, corabelle) and not Reorder(corabelle, wrennie) -> Spritz(corabelle, wrennie))\nforall x (Spritz(x, corabelle) -> Spritz(corabelle, wrennie))\nReorder(corabelle, skipton) and Spritz(corabelle, skipton) -> Spritz(corabelle, marylee)\nforall x (Spritz(x, wrennie) and Warehouse(wrennie, marylee) -> Reorder(x, marylee))\nVoidable(marylee) and Divisional(marylee) -> Spritz(marylee, wrennie)\nforall x (Reorder(x, wrennie) -> Spritz(x, corabelle))\nSerial(skipton) and not Spritz(skipton, corabelle) -> Warehouse(corabelle, wrennie)\n\nnot Spritz(corabelle, wrennie)\n\nReorder(corabelle, wrennie) and forall x (Reorder(x, wrennie) -> Spritz(x, corabelle)) -> therefore Spritz(corabelle, corabelle) Spritz(corabelle, corabelle) and forall x (Spritz(x, corabelle) -> Spritz(corabelle, wrennie)) -> therefore Spritz(corabelle, wrennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The roxine suppurate the dru. The gretna is not abominable. The dru does not eat the zach. The dru is tympanitic. The dru suppurate the gretna. The zach rack the roxine. The zach is airless. If the dru rack the zach then the zach is abominable. If something rack the zach and the zach does not eat the roxine then the zach categorise the roxine. If something categorise the zach then the zach categorise the roxine. If the zach rack the gretna and the zach categorise the gretna then the zach categorise the dru. If something categorise the roxine and the roxine suppurate the dru then it rack the dru. If the dru is mucosal and the dru is teentsy then the dru categorise the roxine. If something rack the roxine then it categorise the zach. If the gretna is abominable and the gretna does not like the zach then the zach suppurate the roxine. The zach rack the dru.", "logic": "\nSuppurate(roxine, dru)\nnot Abominable(gretna)\nnot Rack(dru, zach)\nTympanitic(dru)\nSuppurate(dru, gretna)\nRack(zach, roxine)\nAirless(zach)\nRack(dru, zach) -> Abominable(zach)\nforall x (Rack(x, zach) and not Rack(zach, roxine) -> Categorise(zach, roxine))\nforall x (Categorise(x, zach) -> Categorise(zach, roxine))\nRack(zach, gretna) and Categorise(zach, gretna) -> Categorise(zach, dru)\nforall x (Categorise(x, roxine) and Suppurate(roxine, dru) -> Rack(x, dru))\nMucosal(dru) and Teentsy(dru) -> Categorise(dru, roxine)\nforall x (Rack(x, roxine) -> Categorise(x, zach))\nAbominable(gretna) and not Categorise(gretna, zach) -> Suppurate(zach, roxine)\n\nRack(zach, dru)\n\nRack(zach, roxine) and forall x (Rack(x, roxine) -> Categorise(x, zach)) -> therefore Categorise(zach, zach) Categorise(zach, zach) and forall x (Categorise(x, zach) -> Categorise(zach, roxine)) -> therefore Categorise(zach, roxine) Categorise(zach, roxine) and Suppurate(roxine, dru) and forall x (Categorise(x, roxine) and Suppurate(roxine, dru) -> Rack(x, dru)) -> therefore Rack(zach, dru)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The conney horse the kayla. The savina is not cavalier. The kayla does not eat the sophie. The kayla is aweary. The kayla horse the savina. The sophie deterge the conney. The sophie is extramural. If the kayla deterge the sophie then the sophie is cavalier. If something deterge the sophie and the sophie does not eat the conney then the sophie roughcast the conney. If something roughcast the sophie then the sophie roughcast the conney. If the sophie deterge the savina and the sophie roughcast the savina then the sophie roughcast the kayla. If something roughcast the conney and the conney horse the kayla then it deterge the kayla. If the kayla is meagerly and the kayla is gratuitous then the kayla roughcast the conney. If something deterge the conney then it roughcast the sophie. If the savina is cavalier and the savina does not like the sophie then the sophie horse the conney. The sophie does not eat the kayla.", "logic": "\nHorse(conney, kayla)\nnot Cavalier(savina)\nnot Deterge(kayla, sophie)\nAweary(kayla)\nHorse(kayla, savina)\nDeterge(sophie, conney)\nExtramural(sophie)\nDeterge(kayla, sophie) -> Cavalier(sophie)\nforall x (Deterge(x, sophie) and not Deterge(sophie, conney) -> Roughcast(sophie, conney))\nforall x (Roughcast(x, sophie) -> Roughcast(sophie, conney))\nDeterge(sophie, savina) and Roughcast(sophie, savina) -> Roughcast(sophie, kayla)\nforall x (Roughcast(x, conney) and Horse(conney, kayla) -> Deterge(x, kayla))\nMeagerly(kayla) and Gratuitous(kayla) -> Roughcast(kayla, conney)\nforall x (Deterge(x, conney) -> Roughcast(x, sophie))\nCavalier(savina) and not Roughcast(savina, sophie) -> Horse(sophie, conney)\n\nnot Deterge(sophie, kayla)\n\nDeterge(sophie, conney) and forall x (Deterge(x, conney) -> Roughcast(x, sophie)) -> therefore Roughcast(sophie, sophie) Roughcast(sophie, sophie) and forall x (Roughcast(x, sophie) -> Roughcast(sophie, conney)) -> therefore Roughcast(sophie, conney) Roughcast(sophie, conney) and Horse(conney, kayla) and forall x (Roughcast(x, conney) and Horse(conney, kayla) -> Deterge(x, kayla)) -> therefore Deterge(sophie, kayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The ermina arise the gustie. The gayle is not peeved. The gustie does not eat the ella. The gustie is spoilable. The gustie arise the gayle. The ella reinvent the ermina. The ella is sugarless. If the gustie reinvent the ella then the ella is peeved. If something reinvent the ella and the ella does not eat the ermina then the ella crush the ermina. If something crush the ella then the ella crush the ermina. If the ella reinvent the gayle and the ella crush the gayle then the ella crush the gustie. If something crush the ermina and the ermina arise the gustie then it reinvent the gustie. If the gustie is plumelike and the gustie is corrosive then the gustie crush the ermina. If something reinvent the ermina then it crush the ella. If the gayle is peeved and the gayle does not like the ella then the ella arise the ermina. The gayle does not like the ella.", "logic": "\nArise(ermina, gustie)\nnot Peeved(gayle)\nnot Reinvent(gustie, ella)\nSpoilable(gustie)\nArise(gustie, gayle)\nReinvent(ella, ermina)\nSugarless(ella)\nReinvent(gustie, ella) -> Peeved(ella)\nforall x (Reinvent(x, ella) and not Reinvent(ella, ermina) -> Crush(ella, ermina))\nforall x (Crush(x, ella) -> Crush(ella, ermina))\nReinvent(ella, gayle) and Crush(ella, gayle) -> Crush(ella, gustie)\nforall x (Crush(x, ermina) and Arise(ermina, gustie) -> Reinvent(x, gustie))\nPlumelike(gustie) and Corrosive(gustie) -> Crush(gustie, ermina)\nforall x (Reinvent(x, ermina) -> Crush(x, ella))\nPeeved(gayle) and not Crush(gayle, ella) -> Arise(ella, ermina)\n\nnot Crush(gayle, ella)\n\nforall x (Reinvent(x, ermina) -> Crush(x, ella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The meriel resublime the gae. The denni is not orthoptic. The gae does not eat the adolfo. The gae is changeful. The gae resublime the denni. The adolfo compensate the meriel. The adolfo is skilled. If the gae compensate the adolfo then the adolfo is orthoptic. If something compensate the adolfo and the adolfo does not eat the meriel then the adolfo acclimate the meriel. If something acclimate the adolfo then the adolfo acclimate the meriel. If the adolfo compensate the denni and the adolfo acclimate the denni then the adolfo acclimate the gae. If something acclimate the meriel and the meriel resublime the gae then it compensate the gae. If the gae is attenuate and the gae is centroidal then the gae acclimate the meriel. If something compensate the meriel then it acclimate the adolfo. If the denni is orthoptic and the denni does not like the adolfo then the adolfo resublime the meriel. The adolfo acclimate the gae.", "logic": "\nResublime(meriel, gae)\nnot Orthoptic(denni)\nnot Compensate(gae, adolfo)\nChangeful(gae)\nResublime(gae, denni)\nCompensate(adolfo, meriel)\nSkilled(adolfo)\nCompensate(gae, adolfo) -> Orthoptic(adolfo)\nforall x (Compensate(x, adolfo) and not Compensate(adolfo, meriel) -> Acclimate(adolfo, meriel))\nforall x (Acclimate(x, adolfo) -> Acclimate(adolfo, meriel))\nCompensate(adolfo, denni) and Acclimate(adolfo, denni) -> Acclimate(adolfo, gae)\nforall x (Acclimate(x, meriel) and Resublime(meriel, gae) -> Compensate(x, gae))\nAttenuate(gae) and Centroidal(gae) -> Acclimate(gae, meriel)\nforall x (Compensate(x, meriel) -> Acclimate(x, adolfo))\nOrthoptic(denni) and not Acclimate(denni, adolfo) -> Resublime(adolfo, meriel)\n\nAcclimate(adolfo, gae)\n\nCompensate(adolfo, denni) and Acclimate(adolfo, denni) -> Acclimate(adolfo, gae) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The marcille illegalize the ketti. The doralynn is not faulty. The ketti does not eat the jessy. The ketti is uninjured. The ketti illegalize the doralynn. The jessy tinge the marcille. The jessy is bicentric. If the ketti tinge the jessy then the jessy is faulty. If something tinge the jessy and the jessy does not eat the marcille then the jessy gird the marcille. If something gird the jessy then the jessy gird the marcille. If the jessy tinge the doralynn and the jessy gird the doralynn then the jessy gird the ketti. If something gird the marcille and the marcille illegalize the ketti then it tinge the ketti. If the ketti is poky and the ketti is petulant then the ketti gird the marcille. If something tinge the marcille then it gird the jessy. If the doralynn is faulty and the doralynn does not like the jessy then the jessy illegalize the marcille. The ketti does not eat the ketti.", "logic": "\nIllegalize(marcille, ketti)\nnot Faulty(doralynn)\nnot Tinge(ketti, jessy)\nUninjured(ketti)\nIllegalize(ketti, doralynn)\nTinge(jessy, marcille)\nBicentric(jessy)\nTinge(ketti, jessy) -> Faulty(jessy)\nforall x (Tinge(x, jessy) and not Tinge(jessy, marcille) -> Gird(jessy, marcille))\nforall x (Gird(x, jessy) -> Gird(jessy, marcille))\nTinge(jessy, doralynn) and Gird(jessy, doralynn) -> Gird(jessy, ketti)\nforall x (Gird(x, marcille) and Illegalize(marcille, ketti) -> Tinge(x, ketti))\nPoky(ketti) and Petulant(ketti) -> Gird(ketti, marcille)\nforall x (Tinge(x, marcille) -> Gird(x, jessy))\nFaulty(doralynn) and not Gird(doralynn, jessy) -> Illegalize(jessy, marcille)\n\nnot Tinge(ketti, ketti)\n\nforall x (Gird(x, marcille) and Illegalize(marcille, ketti) -> Tinge(x, ketti)) <- Poky(ketti) and Petulant(ketti) -> Gird(ketti, marcille) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The vonny harken the sumner. The pamella is not grasslike. The sumner does not eat the johnny. The sumner is rattled. The sumner harken the pamella. The johnny aggrandise the vonny. The johnny is oppressive. If the sumner aggrandise the johnny then the johnny is grasslike. If something aggrandise the johnny and the johnny does not eat the vonny then the johnny recrudesce the vonny. If something recrudesce the johnny then the johnny recrudesce the vonny. If the johnny aggrandise the pamella and the johnny recrudesce the pamella then the johnny recrudesce the sumner. If something recrudesce the vonny and the vonny harken the sumner then it aggrandise the sumner. If the sumner is misguided and the sumner is redolent then the sumner recrudesce the vonny. If something aggrandise the vonny then it recrudesce the johnny. If the pamella is grasslike and the pamella does not like the johnny then the johnny harken the vonny. The johnny is grasslike.", "logic": "\nHarken(vonny, sumner)\nnot Grasslike(pamella)\nnot Aggrandise(sumner, johnny)\nRattled(sumner)\nHarken(sumner, pamella)\nAggrandise(johnny, vonny)\nOppressive(johnny)\nAggrandise(sumner, johnny) -> Grasslike(johnny)\nforall x (Aggrandise(x, johnny) and not Aggrandise(johnny, vonny) -> Recrudesce(johnny, vonny))\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, johnny) -> Recrudesce(johnny, vonny))\nAggrandise(johnny, pamella) and Recrudesce(johnny, pamella) -> Recrudesce(johnny, sumner)\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, vonny) and Harken(vonny, sumner) -> Aggrandise(x, sumner))\nMisguided(sumner) and Redolent(sumner) -> Recrudesce(sumner, vonny)\nforall x (Aggrandise(x, vonny) -> Recrudesce(x, johnny))\nGrasslike(pamella) and not Recrudesce(pamella, johnny) -> Harken(johnny, vonny)\n\nGrasslike(johnny)\n\nAggrandise(sumner, johnny) -> Grasslike(johnny) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The briggs propitiate the valli. The griff is not explicit. The valli does not eat the tine. The valli is earlyish. The valli propitiate the griff. The tine melodize the briggs. The tine is exocrine. If the valli melodize the tine then the tine is explicit. If something melodize the tine and the tine does not eat the briggs then the tine spume the briggs. If something spume the tine then the tine spume the briggs. If the tine melodize the griff and the tine spume the griff then the tine spume the valli. If something spume the briggs and the briggs propitiate the valli then it melodize the valli. If the valli is scurrilous and the valli is omnipotent then the valli spume the briggs. If something melodize the briggs then it spume the tine. If the griff is explicit and the griff does not like the tine then the tine propitiate the briggs. The valli does not like the griff.", "logic": "\nPropitiate(briggs, valli)\nnot Explicit(griff)\nnot Melodize(valli, tine)\nEarlyish(valli)\nPropitiate(valli, griff)\nMelodize(tine, briggs)\nExocrine(tine)\nMelodize(valli, tine) -> Explicit(tine)\nforall x (Melodize(x, tine) and not Melodize(tine, briggs) -> Spume(tine, briggs))\nforall x (Spume(x, tine) -> Spume(tine, briggs))\nMelodize(tine, griff) and Spume(tine, griff) -> Spume(tine, valli)\nforall x (Spume(x, briggs) and Propitiate(briggs, valli) -> Melodize(x, valli))\nScurrilous(valli) and Omnipotent(valli) -> Spume(valli, briggs)\nforall x (Melodize(x, briggs) -> Spume(x, tine))\nExplicit(griff) and not Spume(griff, tine) -> Propitiate(tine, briggs)\n\nnot Spume(valli, griff)\n\nnot Spume(valli, griff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The ruthy commutate the augustin. The anastasia is not busted. The augustin does not eat the melitta. The augustin is recyclable. The augustin commutate the anastasia. The melitta behave the ruthy. The melitta is quaggy. If the augustin behave the melitta then the melitta is busted. If something behave the melitta and the melitta does not eat the ruthy then the melitta embed the ruthy. If something embed the melitta then the melitta embed the ruthy. If the melitta behave the anastasia and the melitta embed the anastasia then the melitta embed the augustin. If something embed the ruthy and the ruthy commutate the augustin then it behave the augustin. If the augustin is priapic and the augustin is straw then the augustin embed the ruthy. If something behave the ruthy then it embed the melitta. If the anastasia is busted and the anastasia does not like the melitta then the melitta commutate the ruthy. The augustin is straw.", "logic": "\nCommutate(ruthy, augustin)\nnot Busted(anastasia)\nnot Behave(augustin, melitta)\nRecyclable(augustin)\nCommutate(augustin, anastasia)\nBehave(melitta, ruthy)\nQuaggy(melitta)\nBehave(augustin, melitta) -> Busted(melitta)\nforall x (Behave(x, melitta) and not Behave(melitta, ruthy) -> Embed(melitta, ruthy))\nforall x (Embed(x, melitta) -> Embed(melitta, ruthy))\nBehave(melitta, anastasia) and Embed(melitta, anastasia) -> Embed(melitta, augustin)\nforall x (Embed(x, ruthy) and Commutate(ruthy, augustin) -> Behave(x, augustin))\nPriapic(augustin) and Straw(augustin) -> Embed(augustin, ruthy)\nforall x (Behave(x, ruthy) -> Embed(x, melitta))\nBusted(anastasia) and not Embed(anastasia, melitta) -> Commutate(melitta, ruthy)\n\nStraw(augustin)\n\nStraw(augustin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The marleah regress the renel. The jolie is not pervious. The renel does not eat the brinkley. The renel is teeny. The renel regress the jolie. The brinkley overshoot the marleah. The brinkley is bedridden. If the renel overshoot the brinkley then the brinkley is pervious. If something overshoot the brinkley and the brinkley does not eat the marleah then the brinkley coinsure the marleah. If something coinsure the brinkley then the brinkley coinsure the marleah. If the brinkley overshoot the jolie and the brinkley coinsure the jolie then the brinkley coinsure the renel. If something coinsure the marleah and the marleah regress the renel then it overshoot the renel. If the renel is rugged and the renel is kafkaesque then the renel coinsure the marleah. If something overshoot the marleah then it coinsure the brinkley. If the jolie is pervious and the jolie does not like the brinkley then the brinkley regress the marleah. The brinkley does not eat the jolie.", "logic": "\nRegress(marleah, renel)\nnot Pervious(jolie)\nnot Overshoot(renel, brinkley)\nTeeny(renel)\nRegress(renel, jolie)\nOvershoot(brinkley, marleah)\nBedridden(brinkley)\nOvershoot(renel, brinkley) -> Pervious(brinkley)\nforall x (Overshoot(x, brinkley) and not Overshoot(brinkley, marleah) -> Coinsure(brinkley, marleah))\nforall x (Coinsure(x, brinkley) -> Coinsure(brinkley, marleah))\nOvershoot(brinkley, jolie) and Coinsure(brinkley, jolie) -> Coinsure(brinkley, renel)\nforall x (Coinsure(x, marleah) and Regress(marleah, renel) -> Overshoot(x, renel))\nRugged(renel) and Kafkaesque(renel) -> Coinsure(renel, marleah)\nforall x (Overshoot(x, marleah) -> Coinsure(x, brinkley))\nPervious(jolie) and not Coinsure(jolie, brinkley) -> Regress(brinkley, marleah)\n\nnot Overshoot(brinkley, jolie)\n\nnot Overshoot(brinkley, jolie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "The alia sleigh the blanch. The kaspar is not septrional. The blanch does not eat the tiphanie. The blanch is tongued. The blanch sleigh the kaspar. The tiphanie intermix the alia. The tiphanie is immune. If the blanch intermix the tiphanie then the tiphanie is septrional. If something intermix the tiphanie and the tiphanie does not eat the alia then the tiphanie dissipate the alia. If something dissipate the tiphanie then the tiphanie dissipate the alia. If the tiphanie intermix the kaspar and the tiphanie dissipate the kaspar then the tiphanie dissipate the blanch. If something dissipate the alia and the alia sleigh the blanch then it intermix the blanch. If the blanch is mammoth and the blanch is principled then the blanch dissipate the alia. If something intermix the alia then it dissipate the tiphanie. If the kaspar is septrional and the kaspar does not like the tiphanie then the tiphanie sleigh the alia. The alia is septrional.", "logic": "\nSleigh(alia, blanch)\nnot Septrional(kaspar)\nnot Intermix(blanch, tiphanie)\nTongued(blanch)\nSleigh(blanch, kaspar)\nIntermix(tiphanie, alia)\nImmune(tiphanie)\nIntermix(blanch, tiphanie) -> Septrional(tiphanie)\nforall x (Intermix(x, tiphanie) and not Intermix(tiphanie, alia) -> Dissipate(tiphanie, alia))\nforall x (Dissipate(x, tiphanie) -> Dissipate(tiphanie, alia))\nIntermix(tiphanie, kaspar) and Dissipate(tiphanie, kaspar) -> Dissipate(tiphanie, blanch)\nforall x (Dissipate(x, alia) and Sleigh(alia, blanch) -> Intermix(x, blanch))\nMammoth(blanch) and Principled(blanch) -> Dissipate(blanch, alia)\nforall x (Intermix(x, alia) -> Dissipate(x, tiphanie))\nSeptrional(kaspar) and not Dissipate(kaspar, tiphanie) -> Sleigh(tiphanie, alia)\n\nSeptrional(alia)\n\nSeptrional(alia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-962"} {"premises": "Gaston is permeable. If Gaston is last then Gaston is permeable. Rough things are last. Young things are crummy. If Gaston is unpopular then Gaston is permeable. If Gaston is blurred then Gaston is last. If something is acarpelous and blurred then it is crummy. Gaston is permeable.", "logic": "\nPermeable(gaston)\nLast(gaston) -> Permeable(gaston)\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Last(x))\nforall x (Unpopular(x) -> Crummy(x))\nUnpopular(gaston) -> Permeable(gaston)\nBlurred(gaston) -> Last(gaston)\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and Blurred(x) -> Crummy(x))\n\nPermeable(gaston)\n\ntherefore Permeable(gaston)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4122"} {"premises": "Sunshine is workaday. If Sunshine is ungreased then Sunshine is workaday. Rough things are ungreased. Young things are degrading. If Sunshine is inborn then Sunshine is workaday. If Sunshine is assorted then Sunshine is ungreased. If something is arboreous and assorted then it is degrading. Sunshine is not workaday.", "logic": "\nWorkaday(sunshine)\nUngreased(sunshine) -> Workaday(sunshine)\nforall x (Degrading(x) -> Ungreased(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) -> Degrading(x))\nInborn(sunshine) -> Workaday(sunshine)\nAssorted(sunshine) -> Ungreased(sunshine)\nforall x (Arboreous(x) and Assorted(x) -> Degrading(x))\n\nnot Workaday(sunshine)\n\ntherefore Workaday(sunshine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4122"} {"premises": "Analiese is unjointed. If Analiese is frisian then Analiese is unjointed. Rough things are frisian. Young things are loamless. If Analiese is unparented then Analiese is unjointed. If Analiese is auburn then Analiese is frisian. If something is masterful and auburn then it is loamless. Analiese is not frisian.", "logic": "\nUnjointed(analiese)\nFrisian(analiese) -> Unjointed(analiese)\nforall x (Loamless(x) -> Frisian(x))\nforall x (Unparented(x) -> Loamless(x))\nUnparented(analiese) -> Unjointed(analiese)\nAuburn(analiese) -> Frisian(analiese)\nforall x (Masterful(x) and Auburn(x) -> Loamless(x))\n\nnot Frisian(analiese)\n\nforall x (Loamless(x) -> Frisian(x)) <- forall x (Unparented(x) -> Loamless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4122"} {"premises": "Orton is blowzy. If Orton is kinky then Orton is blowzy. Rough things are kinky. Young things are acrid. If Orton is blithesome then Orton is blowzy. If Orton is bland then Orton is kinky. If something is plumy and bland then it is acrid. Orton is cold.", "logic": "\nBlowzy(orton)\nKinky(orton) -> Blowzy(orton)\nforall x (Acrid(x) -> Kinky(x))\nforall x (Blithesome(x) -> Acrid(x))\nBlithesome(orton) -> Blowzy(orton)\nBland(orton) -> Kinky(orton)\nforall x (Plumy(x) and Bland(x) -> Acrid(x))\n\nCold(orton)\n\nCold(orton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4122"} {"premises": "Tommie is unkind. Tommie is defensive. Tommie is upstair. Tommie is pierced. Rubin is unkind. Rubin is calced. Rubin is defensive. Rubin is upstair. Barnaby is unkind. Barnaby is calced. Barnaby is pierced. Barnaby is sciolistic. All defensive, calced people are persistent. If someone is defensive and persistent then they are sciolistic. Red people are calced. Tommie is upstair.", "logic": "\nUnkind(tommie)\nDefensive(tommie)\nUpstair(tommie)\nPierced(tommie)\nUnkind(rubin)\nCalced(rubin)\nDefensive(rubin)\nUpstair(rubin)\nUnkind(barnaby)\nCalced(barnaby)\nPierced(barnaby)\nSciolistic(barnaby)\nforall x (Defensive(x) and Calced(x) -> Persistent(x))\nforall x (Defensive(x) and Persistent(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (Upstair(x) -> Calced(x))\n\nUpstair(tommie)\n\ntherefore Upstair(tommie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Jedediah is stabile. Jedediah is galled. Jedediah is lengthways. Jedediah is cocksure. Amalia is stabile. Amalia is nosey. Amalia is galled. Amalia is lengthways. Noreen is stabile. Noreen is nosey. Noreen is cocksure. Noreen is sanious. All galled, nosey people are raisable. If someone is galled and raisable then they are sanious. Red people are nosey. Noreen is not stabile.", "logic": "\nStabile(jedediah)\nGalled(jedediah)\nLengthways(jedediah)\nCocksure(jedediah)\nStabile(amalia)\nNosey(amalia)\nGalled(amalia)\nLengthways(amalia)\nStabile(noreen)\nNosey(noreen)\nCocksure(noreen)\nSanious(noreen)\nforall x (Galled(x) and Nosey(x) -> Raisable(x))\nforall x (Galled(x) and Raisable(x) -> Sanious(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) -> Nosey(x))\n\nnot Stabile(noreen)\n\ntherefore Stabile(noreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Imogene is bifacial. Imogene is clonic. Imogene is preanal. Imogene is engraved. Raychel is bifacial. Raychel is otic. Raychel is clonic. Raychel is preanal. Garrett is bifacial. Garrett is otic. Garrett is engraved. Garrett is maimed. All clonic, otic people are overhasty. If someone is clonic and overhasty then they are maimed. Red people are otic. Raychel is overhasty.", "logic": "\nBifacial(imogene)\nClonic(imogene)\nPreanal(imogene)\nEngraved(imogene)\nBifacial(raychel)\nOtic(raychel)\nClonic(raychel)\nPreanal(raychel)\nBifacial(garrett)\nOtic(garrett)\nEngraved(garrett)\nMaimed(garrett)\nforall x (Clonic(x) and Otic(x) -> Overhasty(x))\nforall x (Clonic(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Otic(x))\n\nOverhasty(raychel)\n\nClonic(raychel) and Otic(raychel) and forall x (Clonic(x) and Otic(x) -> Overhasty(x)) -> therefore Overhasty(raychel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Giorgio is eight. Giorgio is outsize. Giorgio is upcoming. Giorgio is broached. Myrtle is eight. Myrtle is esthetical. Myrtle is outsize. Myrtle is upcoming. Adiana is eight. Adiana is esthetical. Adiana is broached. Adiana is spendable. All outsize, esthetical people are interior. If someone is outsize and interior then they are spendable. Red people are esthetical. Giorgio is not esthetical.", "logic": "\nEight(giorgio)\nOutsize(giorgio)\nUpcoming(giorgio)\nBroached(giorgio)\nEight(myrtle)\nEsthetical(myrtle)\nOutsize(myrtle)\nUpcoming(myrtle)\nEight(adiana)\nEsthetical(adiana)\nBroached(adiana)\nSpendable(adiana)\nforall x (Outsize(x) and Esthetical(x) -> Interior(x))\nforall x (Outsize(x) and Interior(x) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) -> Esthetical(x))\n\nnot Esthetical(giorgio)\n\nUpcoming(giorgio) and forall x (Upcoming(x) -> Esthetical(x)) -> therefore Esthetical(giorgio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Susan is scabrous. Susan is flaming. Susan is lovesome. Susan is salutary. Ruby is scabrous. Ruby is caesarean. Ruby is flaming. Ruby is lovesome. Dunstan is scabrous. Dunstan is caesarean. Dunstan is salutary. Dunstan is wainscoted. All flaming, caesarean people are republican. If someone is flaming and republican then they are wainscoted. Red people are caesarean. Ruby is wainscoted.", "logic": "\nScabrous(susan)\nFlaming(susan)\nLovesome(susan)\nSalutary(susan)\nScabrous(ruby)\nCaesarean(ruby)\nFlaming(ruby)\nLovesome(ruby)\nScabrous(dunstan)\nCaesarean(dunstan)\nSalutary(dunstan)\nWainscoted(dunstan)\nforall x (Flaming(x) and Caesarean(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Flaming(x) and Republican(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) -> Caesarean(x))\n\nWainscoted(ruby)\n\nFlaming(ruby) and Caesarean(ruby) and forall x (Flaming(x) and Caesarean(x) -> Republican(x)) -> therefore Republican(ruby) Flaming(ruby) and Republican(ruby) and forall x (Flaming(x) and Republican(x) -> Wainscoted(x)) -> therefore Wainscoted(ruby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Grove is unfeeling. Grove is acid. Grove is anal. Grove is exoergic. Pedro is unfeeling. Pedro is washable. Pedro is acid. Pedro is anal. Saraann is unfeeling. Saraann is washable. Saraann is exoergic. Saraann is coexisting. All acid, washable people are copasetic. If someone is acid and copasetic then they are coexisting. Red people are washable. Pedro is not coexisting.", "logic": "\nUnfeeling(grove)\nAcid(grove)\nAnal(grove)\nExoergic(grove)\nUnfeeling(pedro)\nWashable(pedro)\nAcid(pedro)\nAnal(pedro)\nUnfeeling(saraann)\nWashable(saraann)\nExoergic(saraann)\nCoexisting(saraann)\nforall x (Acid(x) and Washable(x) -> Copasetic(x))\nforall x (Acid(x) and Copasetic(x) -> Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Anal(x) -> Washable(x))\n\nnot Coexisting(pedro)\n\nAcid(pedro) and Washable(pedro) and forall x (Acid(x) and Washable(x) -> Copasetic(x)) -> therefore Copasetic(pedro) Acid(pedro) and Copasetic(pedro) and forall x (Acid(x) and Copasetic(x) -> Coexisting(x)) -> therefore Coexisting(pedro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Dosi is bicolor. Dosi is undefended. Dosi is algerian. Dosi is impressed. Robbi is bicolor. Robbi is dismantled. Robbi is undefended. Robbi is algerian. Malanie is bicolor. Malanie is dismantled. Malanie is impressed. Malanie is asquint. All undefended, dismantled people are spoilable. If someone is undefended and spoilable then they are asquint. Red people are dismantled. Dosi is asquint.", "logic": "\nBicolor(dosi)\nUndefended(dosi)\nAlgerian(dosi)\nImpressed(dosi)\nBicolor(robbi)\nDismantled(robbi)\nUndefended(robbi)\nAlgerian(robbi)\nBicolor(malanie)\nDismantled(malanie)\nImpressed(malanie)\nAsquint(malanie)\nforall x (Undefended(x) and Dismantled(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Asquint(x))\nforall x (Algerian(x) -> Dismantled(x))\n\nAsquint(dosi)\n\nAlgerian(dosi) and forall x (Algerian(x) -> Dismantled(x)) -> therefore Dismantled(dosi) Undefended(dosi) and Dismantled(dosi) and forall x (Undefended(x) and Dismantled(x) -> Spoilable(x)) -> therefore Spoilable(dosi) Undefended(dosi) and Spoilable(dosi) and forall x (Undefended(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Asquint(x)) -> therefore Asquint(dosi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Vivia is knackered. Vivia is prying. Vivia is knavish. Vivia is mitigable. Nissy is knackered. Nissy is peaky. Nissy is prying. Nissy is knavish. Hettie is knackered. Hettie is peaky. Hettie is mitigable. Hettie is monied. All prying, peaky people are clinical. If someone is prying and clinical then they are monied. Red people are peaky. Vivia is not monied.", "logic": "\nKnackered(vivia)\nPrying(vivia)\nKnavish(vivia)\nMitigable(vivia)\nKnackered(nissy)\nPeaky(nissy)\nPrying(nissy)\nKnavish(nissy)\nKnackered(hettie)\nPeaky(hettie)\nMitigable(hettie)\nMonied(hettie)\nforall x (Prying(x) and Peaky(x) -> Clinical(x))\nforall x (Prying(x) and Clinical(x) -> Monied(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> Peaky(x))\n\nnot Monied(vivia)\n\nKnavish(vivia) and forall x (Knavish(x) -> Peaky(x)) -> therefore Peaky(vivia) Prying(vivia) and Peaky(vivia) and forall x (Prying(x) and Peaky(x) -> Clinical(x)) -> therefore Clinical(vivia) Prying(vivia) and Clinical(vivia) and forall x (Prying(x) and Clinical(x) -> Monied(x)) -> therefore Monied(vivia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Johannes is motile. Johannes is buteonine. Johannes is wesleyan. Johannes is tenderized. Uriel is motile. Uriel is iodised. Uriel is buteonine. Uriel is wesleyan. Galen is motile. Galen is iodised. Galen is tenderized. Galen is surgical. All buteonine, iodised people are bunglesome. If someone is buteonine and bunglesome then they are surgical. Red people are iodised. Galen is not bunglesome.", "logic": "\nMotile(johannes)\nButeonine(johannes)\nWesleyan(johannes)\nTenderized(johannes)\nMotile(uriel)\nIodised(uriel)\nButeonine(uriel)\nWesleyan(uriel)\nMotile(galen)\nIodised(galen)\nTenderized(galen)\nSurgical(galen)\nforall x (Buteonine(x) and Iodised(x) -> Bunglesome(x))\nforall x (Buteonine(x) and Bunglesome(x) -> Surgical(x))\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) -> Iodised(x))\n\nnot Bunglesome(galen)\n\nforall x (Buteonine(x) and Iodised(x) -> Bunglesome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Karylin is downbound. Karylin is clownlike. Karylin is ploughed. Karylin is legion. Aindrea is downbound. Aindrea is lawless. Aindrea is clownlike. Aindrea is ploughed. Meredith is downbound. Meredith is lawless. Meredith is legion. Meredith is ameban. All clownlike, lawless people are continual. If someone is clownlike and continual then they are ameban. Red people are lawless. Aindrea is legion.", "logic": "\nDownbound(karylin)\nClownlike(karylin)\nPloughed(karylin)\nLegion(karylin)\nDownbound(aindrea)\nLawless(aindrea)\nClownlike(aindrea)\nPloughed(aindrea)\nDownbound(meredith)\nLawless(meredith)\nLegion(meredith)\nAmeban(meredith)\nforall x (Clownlike(x) and Lawless(x) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) and Continual(x) -> Ameban(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Lawless(x))\n\nLegion(aindrea)\n\nLegion(aindrea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Kimball is smelling. Kimball is juridical. Kimball is centered. Kimball is pyrectic. Fayina is smelling. Fayina is unrivaled. Fayina is juridical. Fayina is centered. Esmerelda is smelling. Esmerelda is unrivaled. Esmerelda is pyrectic. Esmerelda is repressive. All juridical, unrivaled people are auxiliary. If someone is juridical and auxiliary then they are repressive. Red people are unrivaled. Esmerelda is not centered.", "logic": "\nSmelling(kimball)\nJuridical(kimball)\nCentered(kimball)\nPyrectic(kimball)\nSmelling(fayina)\nUnrivaled(fayina)\nJuridical(fayina)\nCentered(fayina)\nSmelling(esmerelda)\nUnrivaled(esmerelda)\nPyrectic(esmerelda)\nRepressive(esmerelda)\nforall x (Juridical(x) and Unrivaled(x) -> Auxiliary(x))\nforall x (Juridical(x) and Auxiliary(x) -> Repressive(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Unrivaled(x))\n\nnot Centered(esmerelda)\n\nnot Centered(esmerelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Lilly is helminthic. Lilly is decayable. Lilly is synoptical. Lilly is devalued. Calvin is helminthic. Calvin is stigmatic. Calvin is decayable. Calvin is synoptical. Ciara is helminthic. Ciara is stigmatic. Ciara is devalued. Ciara is built. All decayable, stigmatic people are uncooked. If someone is decayable and uncooked then they are built. Red people are stigmatic. Ciara is decayable.", "logic": "\nHelminthic(lilly)\nDecayable(lilly)\nSynoptical(lilly)\nDevalued(lilly)\nHelminthic(calvin)\nStigmatic(calvin)\nDecayable(calvin)\nSynoptical(calvin)\nHelminthic(ciara)\nStigmatic(ciara)\nDevalued(ciara)\nBuilt(ciara)\nforall x (Decayable(x) and Stigmatic(x) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Decayable(x) and Uncooked(x) -> Built(x))\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> Stigmatic(x))\n\nDecayable(ciara)\n\nDecayable(ciara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "Elwyn is edentulate. Elwyn is facial. Elwyn is ominous. Elwyn is manichee. Carson is ominous. Carson is miraculous. Carson is manichee. All manichee, facial things are private. All edentulate, lovelorn things are miraculous. All miraculous things are private. Red, manichee things are private. Nice, private things are edentulate. If Elwyn is edentulate and Elwyn is lovelorn then Elwyn is miraculous. All lovelorn, manichee things are miraculous. All miraculous, ominous things are lovelorn. Carson is ominous.", "logic": "\nEdentulate(elwyn)\nFacial(elwyn)\nOminous(elwyn)\nManichee(elwyn)\nOminous(carson)\nMiraculous(carson)\nManichee(carson)\nforall x (Manichee(x) and Facial(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Edentulate(x) and Lovelorn(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nforall x (Miraculous(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and Manichee(x) -> Private(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Private(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nEdentulate(elwyn) and Lovelorn(elwyn) -> Miraculous(elwyn)\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Manichee(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and Ominous(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\n\nOminous(carson)\n\ntherefore Ominous(carson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Max is swollen. Max is batty. Max is appetitive. Max is ahead. Erinna is appetitive. Erinna is dyspneal. Erinna is ahead. All ahead, batty things are absolutist. All swollen, headfirst things are dyspneal. All dyspneal things are absolutist. Red, ahead things are absolutist. Nice, absolutist things are swollen. If Max is swollen and Max is headfirst then Max is dyspneal. All headfirst, ahead things are dyspneal. All dyspneal, appetitive things are headfirst. Max is not appetitive.", "logic": "\nSwollen(max)\nBatty(max)\nAppetitive(max)\nAhead(max)\nAppetitive(erinna)\nDyspneal(erinna)\nAhead(erinna)\nforall x (Ahead(x) and Batty(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Swollen(x) and Headfirst(x) -> Dyspneal(x))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and Ahead(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Appetitive(x) and Absolutist(x) -> Swollen(x))\nSwollen(max) and Headfirst(max) -> Dyspneal(max)\nforall x (Headfirst(x) and Ahead(x) -> Dyspneal(x))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and Appetitive(x) -> Headfirst(x))\n\nnot Appetitive(max)\n\ntherefore Appetitive(max)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Kristen is trophic. Kristen is branched. Kristen is forfeited. Kristen is accessory. Britani is forfeited. Britani is albescent. Britani is accessory. All accessory, branched things are unreached. All trophic, meshuga things are albescent. All albescent things are unreached. Red, accessory things are unreached. Nice, unreached things are trophic. If Kristen is trophic and Kristen is meshuga then Kristen is albescent. All meshuga, accessory things are albescent. All albescent, forfeited things are meshuga. Kristen is unreached.", "logic": "\nTrophic(kristen)\nBranched(kristen)\nForfeited(kristen)\nAccessory(kristen)\nForfeited(britani)\nAlbescent(britani)\nAccessory(britani)\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Branched(x) -> Unreached(x))\nforall x (Trophic(x) and Meshuga(x) -> Albescent(x))\nforall x (Albescent(x) -> Unreached(x))\nforall x (Albescent(x) and Accessory(x) -> Unreached(x))\nforall x (Forfeited(x) and Unreached(x) -> Trophic(x))\nTrophic(kristen) and Meshuga(kristen) -> Albescent(kristen)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) and Accessory(x) -> Albescent(x))\nforall x (Albescent(x) and Forfeited(x) -> Meshuga(x))\n\nUnreached(kristen)\n\nAccessory(kristen) and Branched(kristen) and forall x (Accessory(x) and Branched(x) -> Unreached(x)) -> therefore Unreached(kristen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Rosabelle is afflicted. Rosabelle is duplex. Rosabelle is moving. Rosabelle is tegular. Salim is moving. Salim is timid. Salim is tegular. All tegular, duplex things are egotistic. All afflicted, linguistic things are timid. All timid things are egotistic. Red, tegular things are egotistic. Nice, egotistic things are afflicted. If Rosabelle is afflicted and Rosabelle is linguistic then Rosabelle is timid. All linguistic, tegular things are timid. All timid, moving things are linguistic. Rosabelle is not egotistic.", "logic": "\nAfflicted(rosabelle)\nDuplex(rosabelle)\nMoving(rosabelle)\nTegular(rosabelle)\nMoving(salim)\nTimid(salim)\nTegular(salim)\nforall x (Tegular(x) and Duplex(x) -> Egotistic(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and Linguistic(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Egotistic(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) and Tegular(x) -> Egotistic(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) and Egotistic(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nAfflicted(rosabelle) and Linguistic(rosabelle) -> Timid(rosabelle)\nforall x (Linguistic(x) and Tegular(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) and Moving(x) -> Linguistic(x))\n\nnot Egotistic(rosabelle)\n\nTegular(rosabelle) and Duplex(rosabelle) and forall x (Tegular(x) and Duplex(x) -> Egotistic(x)) -> therefore Egotistic(rosabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Westley is ungreased. Westley is advance. Westley is vulturine. Westley is cultured. Angil is vulturine. Angil is nomadic. Angil is cultured. All cultured, advance things are spavined. All ungreased, canonic things are nomadic. All nomadic things are spavined. Red, cultured things are spavined. Nice, spavined things are ungreased. If Westley is ungreased and Westley is canonic then Westley is nomadic. All canonic, cultured things are nomadic. All nomadic, vulturine things are canonic. Angil is ungreased.", "logic": "\nUngreased(westley)\nAdvance(westley)\nVulturine(westley)\nCultured(westley)\nVulturine(angil)\nNomadic(angil)\nCultured(angil)\nforall x (Cultured(x) and Advance(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Canonic(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) and Cultured(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Vulturine(x) and Spavined(x) -> Ungreased(x))\nUngreased(westley) and Canonic(westley) -> Nomadic(westley)\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Cultured(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nforall x (Nomadic(x) and Vulturine(x) -> Canonic(x))\n\nUngreased(angil)\n\nNomadic(angil) and forall x (Nomadic(x) -> Spavined(x)) -> therefore Spavined(angil) Vulturine(angil) and Spavined(angil) and forall x (Vulturine(x) and Spavined(x) -> Ungreased(x)) -> therefore Ungreased(angil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Madona is homophobic. Madona is sensual. Madona is benthonic. Madona is payable. Esma is benthonic. Esma is public. Esma is payable. All payable, sensual things are laniary. All homophobic, biform things are public. All public things are laniary. Red, payable things are laniary. Nice, laniary things are homophobic. If Madona is homophobic and Madona is biform then Madona is public. All biform, payable things are public. All public, benthonic things are biform. Esma is not homophobic.", "logic": "\nHomophobic(madona)\nSensual(madona)\nBenthonic(madona)\nPayable(madona)\nBenthonic(esma)\nPublic(esma)\nPayable(esma)\nforall x (Payable(x) and Sensual(x) -> Laniary(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) and Biform(x) -> Public(x))\nforall x (Public(x) -> Laniary(x))\nforall x (Public(x) and Payable(x) -> Laniary(x))\nforall x (Benthonic(x) and Laniary(x) -> Homophobic(x))\nHomophobic(madona) and Biform(madona) -> Public(madona)\nforall x (Biform(x) and Payable(x) -> Public(x))\nforall x (Public(x) and Benthonic(x) -> Biform(x))\n\nnot Homophobic(esma)\n\nPublic(esma) and forall x (Public(x) -> Laniary(x)) -> therefore Laniary(esma) Benthonic(esma) and Laniary(esma) and forall x (Benthonic(x) and Laniary(x) -> Homophobic(x)) -> therefore Homophobic(esma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Devi is ebionite. Devi is puffed. Devi is palatial. Devi is unclad. Roscoe is palatial. Roscoe is fortemente. Roscoe is unclad. All unclad, puffed things are cervical. All ebionite, affluent things are fortemente. All fortemente things are cervical. Red, unclad things are cervical. Nice, cervical things are ebionite. If Devi is ebionite and Devi is affluent then Devi is fortemente. All affluent, unclad things are fortemente. All fortemente, palatial things are affluent. Devi is not affluent.", "logic": "\nEbionite(devi)\nPuffed(devi)\nPalatial(devi)\nUnclad(devi)\nPalatial(roscoe)\nFortemente(roscoe)\nUnclad(roscoe)\nforall x (Unclad(x) and Puffed(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Ebionite(x) and Affluent(x) -> Fortemente(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Unclad(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Palatial(x) and Cervical(x) -> Ebionite(x))\nEbionite(devi) and Affluent(devi) -> Fortemente(devi)\nforall x (Affluent(x) and Unclad(x) -> Fortemente(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Palatial(x) -> Affluent(x))\n\nnot Affluent(devi)\n\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Palatial(x) -> Affluent(x)) <- forall x (Ebionite(x) and Affluent(x) -> Fortemente(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Raleigh is unchaste. Raleigh is pinnatifid. Raleigh is flemish. Raleigh is dominical. Pammie is flemish. Pammie is puerile. Pammie is dominical. All dominical, pinnatifid things are qatari. All unchaste, reduced things are puerile. All puerile things are qatari. Red, dominical things are qatari. Nice, qatari things are unchaste. If Raleigh is unchaste and Raleigh is reduced then Raleigh is puerile. All reduced, dominical things are puerile. All puerile, flemish things are reduced. Raleigh is puerile.", "logic": "\nUnchaste(raleigh)\nPinnatifid(raleigh)\nFlemish(raleigh)\nDominical(raleigh)\nFlemish(pammie)\nPuerile(pammie)\nDominical(pammie)\nforall x (Dominical(x) and Pinnatifid(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Reduced(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) and Dominical(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Flemish(x) and Qatari(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nUnchaste(raleigh) and Reduced(raleigh) -> Puerile(raleigh)\nforall x (Reduced(x) and Dominical(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) and Flemish(x) -> Reduced(x))\n\nPuerile(raleigh)\n\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Reduced(x) -> Puerile(x)) <- forall x (Puerile(x) and Flemish(x) -> Reduced(x)) <- Unchaste(raleigh) and Reduced(raleigh) -> Puerile(raleigh) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1614"} {"premises": "Elbert is unheeded. Elmira is grapelike. Myrtia is insurable. Lynnet is grapelike. If something is unheeded then it is unhardened. Nice, grapelike things are insurable. If something is tinned and grapelike then it is achromic. All tinned things are achromic. Green things are tinned. If something is insurable and not tinned then it is drowsing. Myrtia is insurable.", "logic": "\nUnheeded(elbert)\nGrapelike(elmira)\nInsurable(myrtia)\nGrapelike(lynnet)\nforall x (Unheeded(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Achromic(x) and Grapelike(x) -> Insurable(x))\nforall x (Tinned(x) and Grapelike(x) -> Achromic(x))\nforall x (Tinned(x) -> Achromic(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Insurable(x) and not Tinned(x) -> Drowsing(x))\n\nInsurable(myrtia)\n\ntherefore Insurable(myrtia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Waylon is nautical. Cassi is pyrectic. Loretta is teal. Mirabella is pyrectic. If something is nautical then it is maggoty. Nice, pyrectic things are teal. If something is holey and pyrectic then it is opaque. All holey things are opaque. Green things are holey. If something is teal and not holey then it is unswerving. Waylon is not nautical.", "logic": "\nNautical(waylon)\nPyrectic(cassi)\nTeal(loretta)\nPyrectic(mirabella)\nforall x (Nautical(x) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) and Pyrectic(x) -> Teal(x))\nforall x (Holey(x) and Pyrectic(x) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Holey(x) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) -> Holey(x))\nforall x (Teal(x) and not Holey(x) -> Unswerving(x))\n\nnot Nautical(waylon)\n\ntherefore Nautical(waylon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Jackelyn is flavorous. Jillene is tinselly. Griff is worshipful. Simmonds is tinselly. If something is flavorous then it is vapourous. Nice, tinselly things are worshipful. If something is jovial and tinselly then it is damn. All jovial things are damn. Green things are jovial. If something is worshipful and not jovial then it is fabled. Simmonds is jovial.", "logic": "\nFlavorous(jackelyn)\nTinselly(jillene)\nWorshipful(griff)\nTinselly(simmonds)\nforall x (Flavorous(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Damn(x) and Tinselly(x) -> Worshipful(x))\nforall x (Jovial(x) and Tinselly(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Jovial(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Tinselly(x) -> Jovial(x))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) and not Jovial(x) -> Fabled(x))\n\nJovial(simmonds)\n\nTinselly(simmonds) and forall x (Tinselly(x) -> Jovial(x)) -> therefore Jovial(simmonds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Rochella is insidious. Mellicent is overactive. Bary is shrewd. Hattie is overactive. If something is insidious then it is captive. Nice, overactive things are shrewd. If something is foster and overactive then it is calm. All foster things are calm. Green things are foster. If something is shrewd and not foster then it is encrusted. Rochella is not captive.", "logic": "\nInsidious(rochella)\nOveractive(mellicent)\nShrewd(bary)\nOveractive(hattie)\nforall x (Insidious(x) -> Captive(x))\nforall x (Calm(x) and Overactive(x) -> Shrewd(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) and Overactive(x) -> Calm(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) -> Calm(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Shrewd(x) and not Foster(x) -> Encrusted(x))\n\nnot Captive(rochella)\n\nInsidious(rochella) and forall x (Insidious(x) -> Captive(x)) -> therefore Captive(rochella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Lindsay is immunized. Casandra is limited. Myke is essential. Amalle is limited. If something is immunized then it is birchen. Nice, limited things are essential. If something is sparkly and limited then it is textured. All sparkly things are textured. Green things are sparkly. If something is essential and not sparkly then it is guarded. Amalle is textured.", "logic": "\nImmunized(lindsay)\nLimited(casandra)\nEssential(myke)\nLimited(amalle)\nforall x (Immunized(x) -> Birchen(x))\nforall x (Textured(x) and Limited(x) -> Essential(x))\nforall x (Sparkly(x) and Limited(x) -> Textured(x))\nforall x (Sparkly(x) -> Textured(x))\nforall x (Limited(x) -> Sparkly(x))\nforall x (Essential(x) and not Sparkly(x) -> Guarded(x))\n\nTextured(amalle)\n\nLimited(amalle) and forall x (Limited(x) -> Sparkly(x)) -> therefore Sparkly(amalle) Sparkly(amalle) and forall x (Sparkly(x) -> Textured(x)) -> therefore Textured(amalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Nadine is djiboutian. Julian is trepid. Bellina is arterial. Berkie is trepid. If something is djiboutian then it is bewitched. Nice, trepid things are arterial. If something is limitless and trepid then it is incomplete. All limitless things are incomplete. Green things are limitless. If something is arterial and not limitless then it is measly. Berkie is not incomplete.", "logic": "\nDjiboutian(nadine)\nTrepid(julian)\nArterial(bellina)\nTrepid(berkie)\nforall x (Djiboutian(x) -> Bewitched(x))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) and Trepid(x) -> Arterial(x))\nforall x (Limitless(x) and Trepid(x) -> Incomplete(x))\nforall x (Limitless(x) -> Incomplete(x))\nforall x (Trepid(x) -> Limitless(x))\nforall x (Arterial(x) and not Limitless(x) -> Measly(x))\n\nnot Incomplete(berkie)\n\nTrepid(berkie) and forall x (Trepid(x) -> Limitless(x)) -> therefore Limitless(berkie) Limitless(berkie) and forall x (Limitless(x) -> Incomplete(x)) -> therefore Incomplete(berkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Marquita is intestate. Clemmy is noncrucial. Kelcy is spry. Sula is noncrucial. If something is intestate then it is illusory. Nice, noncrucial things are spry. If something is metallike and noncrucial then it is untapped. All metallike things are untapped. Green things are metallike. If something is spry and not metallike then it is protected. Clemmy is spry.", "logic": "\nIntestate(marquita)\nNoncrucial(clemmy)\nSpry(kelcy)\nNoncrucial(sula)\nforall x (Intestate(x) -> Illusory(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) and Noncrucial(x) -> Spry(x))\nforall x (Metallike(x) and Noncrucial(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Metallike(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Noncrucial(x) -> Metallike(x))\nforall x (Spry(x) and not Metallike(x) -> Protected(x))\n\nSpry(clemmy)\n\nNoncrucial(clemmy) and forall x (Noncrucial(x) -> Metallike(x)) -> therefore Metallike(clemmy) Metallike(clemmy) and forall x (Metallike(x) -> Untapped(x)) -> therefore Untapped(clemmy) Untapped(clemmy) and Noncrucial(clemmy) and forall x (Untapped(x) and Noncrucial(x) -> Spry(x)) -> therefore Spry(clemmy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Robinson is manichee. Dulcy is anatomic. Cleopatra is retrorse. Emanuela is anatomic. If something is manichee then it is idiopathic. Nice, anatomic things are retrorse. If something is tainted and anatomic then it is batrachian. All tainted things are batrachian. Green things are tainted. If something is retrorse and not tainted then it is alarmed. Emanuela is not retrorse.", "logic": "\nManichee(robinson)\nAnatomic(dulcy)\nRetrorse(cleopatra)\nAnatomic(emanuela)\nforall x (Manichee(x) -> Idiopathic(x))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Retrorse(x))\nforall x (Tainted(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Batrachian(x))\nforall x (Tainted(x) -> Batrachian(x))\nforall x (Anatomic(x) -> Tainted(x))\nforall x (Retrorse(x) and not Tainted(x) -> Alarmed(x))\n\nnot Retrorse(emanuela)\n\nAnatomic(emanuela) and forall x (Anatomic(x) -> Tainted(x)) -> therefore Tainted(emanuela) Tainted(emanuela) and forall x (Tainted(x) -> Batrachian(x)) -> therefore Batrachian(emanuela) Batrachian(emanuela) and Anatomic(emanuela) and forall x (Batrachian(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Retrorse(x)) -> therefore Retrorse(emanuela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Pyotr is rental. Noelani is highbrow. Tamas is tumid. Lonnie is highbrow. If something is rental then it is liquescent. Nice, highbrow things are tumid. If something is unengaged and highbrow then it is emboldened. All unengaged things are emboldened. Green things are unengaged. If something is tumid and not unengaged then it is unloved. Tamas is not emboldened.", "logic": "\nRental(pyotr)\nHighbrow(noelani)\nTumid(tamas)\nHighbrow(lonnie)\nforall x (Rental(x) -> Liquescent(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and Highbrow(x) -> Tumid(x))\nforall x (Unengaged(x) and Highbrow(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Unengaged(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Unengaged(x))\nforall x (Tumid(x) and not Unengaged(x) -> Unloved(x))\n\nnot Emboldened(tamas)\n\nforall x (Unengaged(x) -> Emboldened(x)) <- forall x (Highbrow(x) -> Unengaged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Marcus is engaged. Sharlene is radio. Cissie is unfilmed. Theressa is radio. If something is engaged then it is stuck. Nice, radio things are unfilmed. If something is insincere and radio then it is stuffy. All insincere things are stuffy. Green things are insincere. If something is unfilmed and not insincere then it is swank. Sharlene is swank.", "logic": "\nEngaged(marcus)\nRadio(sharlene)\nUnfilmed(cissie)\nRadio(theressa)\nforall x (Engaged(x) -> Stuck(x))\nforall x (Stuffy(x) and Radio(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\nforall x (Insincere(x) and Radio(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Insincere(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Radio(x) -> Insincere(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) and not Insincere(x) -> Swank(x))\n\nSwank(sharlene)\n\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) and not Insincere(x) -> Swank(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Suzan is allotted. Prissie is rejoicing. Becky is prepaid. Louise is rejoicing. If something is allotted then it is bilabiate. Nice, rejoicing things are prepaid. If something is curving and rejoicing then it is wrinkled. All curving things are wrinkled. Green things are curving. If something is prepaid and not curving then it is unstylish. Louise is not unstylish.", "logic": "\nAllotted(suzan)\nRejoicing(prissie)\nPrepaid(becky)\nRejoicing(louise)\nforall x (Allotted(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) and Rejoicing(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) and Rejoicing(x) -> Wrinkled(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Wrinkled(x))\nforall x (Rejoicing(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Prepaid(x) and not Curving(x) -> Unstylish(x))\n\nnot Unstylish(louise)\n\nforall x (Prepaid(x) and not Curving(x) -> Unstylish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Hermon is voiced. Angelina is roughshod. Giraldo is apodictic. Sophie is roughshod. If something is voiced then it is extrusive. Nice, roughshod things are apodictic. If something is pelecypod and roughshod then it is undefined. All pelecypod things are undefined. Green things are pelecypod. If something is apodictic and not pelecypod then it is cuspidated. Hermon is cuspidated.", "logic": "\nVoiced(hermon)\nRoughshod(angelina)\nApodictic(giraldo)\nRoughshod(sophie)\nforall x (Voiced(x) -> Extrusive(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) and Roughshod(x) -> Apodictic(x))\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) and Roughshod(x) -> Undefined(x))\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) -> Undefined(x))\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Pelecypod(x))\nforall x (Apodictic(x) and not Pelecypod(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\n\nCuspidated(hermon)\n\nforall x (Apodictic(x) and not Pelecypod(x) -> Cuspidated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Derk is uncrannied. Rafaela is tined. Stephani is knockout. Nicholas is tined. If something is uncrannied then it is catalytic. Nice, tined things are knockout. If something is placoid and tined then it is auditory. All placoid things are auditory. Green things are placoid. If something is knockout and not placoid then it is shitless. Derk is not tined.", "logic": "\nUncrannied(derk)\nTined(rafaela)\nKnockout(stephani)\nTined(nicholas)\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) -> Catalytic(x))\nforall x (Auditory(x) and Tined(x) -> Knockout(x))\nforall x (Placoid(x) and Tined(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Placoid(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Placoid(x))\nforall x (Knockout(x) and not Placoid(x) -> Shitless(x))\n\nnot Tined(derk)\n\nnot Tined(derk) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Dulciana is mechanised. Fitz is misplaced. Oberon is encased. Valina is misplaced. If something is mechanised then it is bold. Nice, misplaced things are encased. If something is nonsense and misplaced then it is indiscrete. All nonsense things are indiscrete. Green things are nonsense. If something is encased and not nonsense then it is doped. Fitz is mechanised.", "logic": "\nMechanised(dulciana)\nMisplaced(fitz)\nEncased(oberon)\nMisplaced(valina)\nforall x (Mechanised(x) -> Bold(x))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) and Misplaced(x) -> Encased(x))\nforall x (Nonsense(x) and Misplaced(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Nonsense(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) and not Nonsense(x) -> Doped(x))\n\nMechanised(fitz)\n\nMechanised(fitz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Jonny is tardy. Obadias is stormproof. Audie is chelate. Kimberley is stormproof. If something is tardy then it is appalling. Nice, stormproof things are chelate. If something is bedraggled and stormproof then it is traveled. All bedraggled things are traveled. Green things are bedraggled. If something is chelate and not bedraggled then it is reticent. Audie is not stormproof.", "logic": "\nTardy(jonny)\nStormproof(obadias)\nChelate(audie)\nStormproof(kimberley)\nforall x (Tardy(x) -> Appalling(x))\nforall x (Traveled(x) and Stormproof(x) -> Chelate(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Stormproof(x) -> Traveled(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) -> Traveled(x))\nforall x (Stormproof(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x) and not Bedraggled(x) -> Reticent(x))\n\nnot Stormproof(audie)\n\nnot Stormproof(audie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Janus is jingling. Robinia is unsold. Perrine is absolute. Georgina is unsold. If something is jingling then it is torrid. Nice, unsold things are absolute. If something is base and unsold then it is enlivening. All base things are enlivening. Green things are base. If something is absolute and not base then it is torrential. Georgina is jingling.", "logic": "\nJingling(janus)\nUnsold(robinia)\nAbsolute(perrine)\nUnsold(georgina)\nforall x (Jingling(x) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Enlivening(x) and Unsold(x) -> Absolute(x))\nforall x (Base(x) and Unsold(x) -> Enlivening(x))\nforall x (Base(x) -> Enlivening(x))\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Base(x))\nforall x (Absolute(x) and not Base(x) -> Torrential(x))\n\nJingling(georgina)\n\nJingling(georgina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1219"} {"premises": "Donni is fragrant. Tara is not pricey. Esta is not many. Philomena is apocarpous. Cold things are irreverent. If Esta is interred then Esta is not many. Young things are many. Philomena is apocarpous.", "logic": "\nFragrant(donni)\nnot Pricey(tara)\nnot Many(esta)\nApocarpous(philomena)\nforall x (Many(x) -> Irreverent(x))\nInterred(esta) -> not Many(esta)\nforall x (Fragrant(x) -> Many(x))\n\nApocarpous(philomena)\n\ntherefore Apocarpous(philomena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Wash is nonstop. Fonsie is not adulatory. Vladamir is not notifiable. Gardener is dainty. Cold things are unattired. If Vladamir is vascular then Vladamir is not notifiable. Young things are notifiable. Gardener is not dainty.", "logic": "\nNonstop(wash)\nnot Adulatory(fonsie)\nnot Notifiable(vladamir)\nDainty(gardener)\nforall x (Notifiable(x) -> Unattired(x))\nVascular(vladamir) -> not Notifiable(vladamir)\nforall x (Nonstop(x) -> Notifiable(x))\n\nnot Dainty(gardener)\n\ntherefore Dainty(gardener)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Isabeau is autacoidal. Giselle is not disabling. Laurella is not alterative. Malcah is fibrinous. Cold things are drooping. If Laurella is heritable then Laurella is not alterative. Young things are alterative. Isabeau is alterative.", "logic": "\nAutacoidal(isabeau)\nnot Disabling(giselle)\nnot Alterative(laurella)\nFibrinous(malcah)\nforall x (Alterative(x) -> Drooping(x))\nHeritable(laurella) -> not Alterative(laurella)\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) -> Alterative(x))\n\nAlterative(isabeau)\n\nAutacoidal(isabeau) and forall x (Autacoidal(x) -> Alterative(x)) -> therefore Alterative(isabeau)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Ebba is umber. Mahmud is not aslant. Camellia is not regal. Tarrant is bordered. Cold things are backless. If Camellia is sneering then Camellia is not regal. Young things are regal. Ebba is not regal.", "logic": "\nUmber(ebba)\nnot Aslant(mahmud)\nnot Regal(camellia)\nBordered(tarrant)\nforall x (Regal(x) -> Backless(x))\nSneering(camellia) -> not Regal(camellia)\nforall x (Umber(x) -> Regal(x))\n\nnot Regal(ebba)\n\nUmber(ebba) and forall x (Umber(x) -> Regal(x)) -> therefore Regal(ebba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Zorine is amort. Vere is not thirsty. Garrot is not glistening. Silvan is septic. Cold things are favored. If Garrot is grave then Garrot is not glistening. Young things are glistening. Zorine is favored.", "logic": "\nAmort(zorine)\nnot Thirsty(vere)\nnot Glistening(garrot)\nSeptic(silvan)\nforall x (Glistening(x) -> Favored(x))\nGrave(garrot) -> not Glistening(garrot)\nforall x (Amort(x) -> Glistening(x))\n\nFavored(zorine)\n\nAmort(zorine) and forall x (Amort(x) -> Glistening(x)) -> therefore Glistening(zorine) Glistening(zorine) and forall x (Glistening(x) -> Favored(x)) -> therefore Favored(zorine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Kirk is piquant. Deana is not pinnated. Talbot is not noachian. Sydel is latest. Cold things are titulary. If Talbot is ameboid then Talbot is not noachian. Young things are noachian. Kirk is not titulary.", "logic": "\nPiquant(kirk)\nnot Pinnated(deana)\nnot Noachian(talbot)\nLatest(sydel)\nforall x (Noachian(x) -> Titulary(x))\nAmeboid(talbot) -> not Noachian(talbot)\nforall x (Piquant(x) -> Noachian(x))\n\nnot Titulary(kirk)\n\nPiquant(kirk) and forall x (Piquant(x) -> Noachian(x)) -> therefore Noachian(kirk) Noachian(kirk) and forall x (Noachian(x) -> Titulary(x)) -> therefore Titulary(kirk)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Pen is catalan. Brandise is not timorese. Wald is not sere. Jaquelin is trusted. Cold things are unoccupied. If Wald is rifled then Wald is not sere. Young things are sere. Brandise is not unoccupied.", "logic": "\nCatalan(pen)\nnot Timorese(brandise)\nnot Sere(wald)\nTrusted(jaquelin)\nforall x (Sere(x) -> Unoccupied(x))\nRifled(wald) -> not Sere(wald)\nforall x (Catalan(x) -> Sere(x))\n\nnot Unoccupied(brandise)\n\nforall x (Sere(x) -> Unoccupied(x)) <- forall x (Catalan(x) -> Sere(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Luke is padded. Devon is not unopened. Diannne is not manned. Gregor is despoiled. Cold things are botanical. If Diannne is rasping then Diannne is not manned. Young things are manned. Gregor is botanical.", "logic": "\nPadded(luke)\nnot Unopened(devon)\nnot Manned(diannne)\nDespoiled(gregor)\nforall x (Manned(x) -> Botanical(x))\nRasping(diannne) -> not Manned(diannne)\nforall x (Padded(x) -> Manned(x))\n\nBotanical(gregor)\n\nforall x (Manned(x) -> Botanical(x)) <- forall x (Padded(x) -> Manned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Marjy is unflawed. Carlynn is not aramean. Betteanne is not cobwebby. Coral is zionist. Cold things are barred. If Betteanne is cognizable then Betteanne is not cobwebby. Young things are cobwebby. Betteanne is not barred.", "logic": "\nUnflawed(marjy)\nnot Aramean(carlynn)\nnot Cobwebby(betteanne)\nZionist(coral)\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) -> Barred(x))\nCognizable(betteanne) -> not Cobwebby(betteanne)\nforall x (Unflawed(x) -> Cobwebby(x))\n\nnot Barred(betteanne)\n\nforall x (Cobwebby(x) -> Barred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Megen is ivied. Wilt is not stranded. Travis is not whorled. Hollyanne is scalloped. Cold things are scalelike. If Travis is unclaimed then Travis is not whorled. Young things are whorled. Travis is stranded.", "logic": "\nIvied(megen)\nnot Stranded(wilt)\nnot Whorled(travis)\nScalloped(hollyanne)\nforall x (Whorled(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nUnclaimed(travis) -> not Whorled(travis)\nforall x (Ivied(x) -> Whorled(x))\n\nStranded(travis)\n\nStranded(travis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Phip is marooned. Darleen is not attempted. Garv is not felicitous. Dotty is skilled. Cold things are sweltry. If Garv is ironclad then Garv is not felicitous. Young things are felicitous. Garv is not ironclad.", "logic": "\nMarooned(phip)\nnot Attempted(darleen)\nnot Felicitous(garv)\nSkilled(dotty)\nforall x (Felicitous(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nIronclad(garv) -> not Felicitous(garv)\nforall x (Marooned(x) -> Felicitous(x))\n\nnot Ironclad(garv)\n\nnot Ironclad(garv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "Luanna is niffy. Piotr is not unadvised. Merrielle is not pelecypod. Ebeneser is leaden. Cold things are parked. If Merrielle is engraved then Merrielle is not pelecypod. Young things are pelecypod. Luanna is engraved.", "logic": "\nNiffy(luanna)\nnot Unadvised(piotr)\nnot Pelecypod(merrielle)\nLeaden(ebeneser)\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) -> Parked(x))\nEngraved(merrielle) -> not Pelecypod(merrielle)\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> Pelecypod(x))\n\nEngraved(luanna)\n\nEngraved(luanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1173"} {"premises": "The torey circle the audi. The torey talc the audi. The audi talc the torey. If someone talc the audi and the audi circle the torey then the audi talc the torey. If someone vault the audi then they are mesenteric. If the torey vault the audi then the audi circle the torey. If someone circle the audi and the audi vault the torey then the torey vault the audi. If someone talc the audi then the audi vault the torey. If someone talc the torey then they eat the torey. The audi talc the torey.", "logic": "\nCircle(torey, audi)\nTalc(torey, audi)\nTalc(audi, torey)\nforall x (Talc(x, audi) and Circle(audi, torey) -> Talc(audi, torey))\nforall x (Vault(x, audi) -> Mesenteric(x))\nVault(torey, audi) -> Circle(audi, torey)\nforall x (Circle(x, audi) and Vault(audi, torey) -> Vault(torey, audi))\nforall x (Talc(x, audi) -> Vault(audi, torey))\nforall x (Talc(x, torey) -> Circle(x, torey))\n\nTalc(audi, torey)\n\ntherefore Talc(audi, torey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The lorene schmooze the kirbie. The lorene carom the kirbie. The kirbie carom the lorene. If someone carom the kirbie and the kirbie schmooze the lorene then the kirbie carom the lorene. If someone madder the kirbie then they are deist. If the lorene madder the kirbie then the kirbie schmooze the lorene. If someone schmooze the kirbie and the kirbie madder the lorene then the lorene madder the kirbie. If someone carom the kirbie then the kirbie madder the lorene. If someone carom the lorene then they eat the lorene. The lorene does not see the kirbie.", "logic": "\nSchmooze(lorene, kirbie)\nCarom(lorene, kirbie)\nCarom(kirbie, lorene)\nforall x (Carom(x, kirbie) and Schmooze(kirbie, lorene) -> Carom(kirbie, lorene))\nforall x (Madder(x, kirbie) -> Deist(x))\nMadder(lorene, kirbie) -> Schmooze(kirbie, lorene)\nforall x (Schmooze(x, kirbie) and Madder(kirbie, lorene) -> Madder(lorene, kirbie))\nforall x (Carom(x, kirbie) -> Madder(kirbie, lorene))\nforall x (Carom(x, lorene) -> Schmooze(x, lorene))\n\nnot Carom(lorene, kirbie)\n\ntherefore Carom(lorene, kirbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The hanson scroll the whitman. The hanson deter the whitman. The whitman deter the hanson. If someone deter the whitman and the whitman scroll the hanson then the whitman deter the hanson. If someone sign the whitman then they are tsaristic. If the hanson sign the whitman then the whitman scroll the hanson. If someone scroll the whitman and the whitman sign the hanson then the hanson sign the whitman. If someone deter the whitman then the whitman sign the hanson. If someone deter the hanson then they eat the hanson. The whitman sign the hanson.", "logic": "\nScroll(hanson, whitman)\nDeter(hanson, whitman)\nDeter(whitman, hanson)\nforall x (Deter(x, whitman) and Scroll(whitman, hanson) -> Deter(whitman, hanson))\nforall x (Sign(x, whitman) -> Tsaristic(x))\nSign(hanson, whitman) -> Scroll(whitman, hanson)\nforall x (Scroll(x, whitman) and Sign(whitman, hanson) -> Sign(hanson, whitman))\nforall x (Deter(x, whitman) -> Sign(whitman, hanson))\nforall x (Deter(x, hanson) -> Scroll(x, hanson))\n\nSign(whitman, hanson)\n\nDeter(hanson, whitman) and forall x (Deter(x, whitman) -> Sign(whitman, hanson)) -> therefore Sign(whitman, hanson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The lara train the suki. The lara bristle the suki. The suki bristle the lara. If someone bristle the suki and the suki train the lara then the suki bristle the lara. If someone alligator the suki then they are tainted. If the lara alligator the suki then the suki train the lara. If someone train the suki and the suki alligator the lara then the lara alligator the suki. If someone bristle the suki then the suki alligator the lara. If someone bristle the lara then they eat the lara. The suki does not visit the lara.", "logic": "\nTrain(lara, suki)\nBristle(lara, suki)\nBristle(suki, lara)\nforall x (Bristle(x, suki) and Train(suki, lara) -> Bristle(suki, lara))\nforall x (Alligator(x, suki) -> Tainted(x))\nAlligator(lara, suki) -> Train(suki, lara)\nforall x (Train(x, suki) and Alligator(suki, lara) -> Alligator(lara, suki))\nforall x (Bristle(x, suki) -> Alligator(suki, lara))\nforall x (Bristle(x, lara) -> Train(x, lara))\n\nnot Alligator(suki, lara)\n\nBristle(lara, suki) and forall x (Bristle(x, suki) -> Alligator(suki, lara)) -> therefore Alligator(suki, lara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The leanne forbear the kaylee. The leanne daydream the kaylee. The kaylee daydream the leanne. If someone daydream the kaylee and the kaylee forbear the leanne then the kaylee daydream the leanne. If someone consider the kaylee then they are unromantic. If the leanne consider the kaylee then the kaylee forbear the leanne. If someone forbear the kaylee and the kaylee consider the leanne then the leanne consider the kaylee. If someone daydream the kaylee then the kaylee consider the leanne. If someone daydream the leanne then they eat the leanne. The leanne consider the kaylee.", "logic": "\nForbear(leanne, kaylee)\nDaydream(leanne, kaylee)\nDaydream(kaylee, leanne)\nforall x (Daydream(x, kaylee) and Forbear(kaylee, leanne) -> Daydream(kaylee, leanne))\nforall x (Consider(x, kaylee) -> Unromantic(x))\nConsider(leanne, kaylee) -> Forbear(kaylee, leanne)\nforall x (Forbear(x, kaylee) and Consider(kaylee, leanne) -> Consider(leanne, kaylee))\nforall x (Daydream(x, kaylee) -> Consider(kaylee, leanne))\nforall x (Daydream(x, leanne) -> Forbear(x, leanne))\n\nConsider(leanne, kaylee)\n\nDaydream(leanne, kaylee) and forall x (Daydream(x, kaylee) -> Consider(kaylee, leanne)) -> therefore Consider(kaylee, leanne) Forbear(leanne, kaylee) and Consider(kaylee, leanne) and forall x (Forbear(x, kaylee) and Consider(kaylee, leanne) -> Consider(leanne, kaylee)) -> therefore Consider(leanne, kaylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The carlin causeway the reagan. The carlin sellotape the reagan. The reagan sellotape the carlin. If someone sellotape the reagan and the reagan causeway the carlin then the reagan sellotape the carlin. If someone succor the reagan then they are pinstriped. If the carlin succor the reagan then the reagan causeway the carlin. If someone causeway the reagan and the reagan succor the carlin then the carlin succor the reagan. If someone sellotape the reagan then the reagan succor the carlin. If someone sellotape the carlin then they eat the carlin. The carlin does not visit the reagan.", "logic": "\nCauseway(carlin, reagan)\nSellotape(carlin, reagan)\nSellotape(reagan, carlin)\nforall x (Sellotape(x, reagan) and Causeway(reagan, carlin) -> Sellotape(reagan, carlin))\nforall x (Succor(x, reagan) -> Pinstriped(x))\nSuccor(carlin, reagan) -> Causeway(reagan, carlin)\nforall x (Causeway(x, reagan) and Succor(reagan, carlin) -> Succor(carlin, reagan))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, reagan) -> Succor(reagan, carlin))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, carlin) -> Causeway(x, carlin))\n\nnot Succor(carlin, reagan)\n\nSellotape(carlin, reagan) and forall x (Sellotape(x, reagan) -> Succor(reagan, carlin)) -> therefore Succor(reagan, carlin) Causeway(carlin, reagan) and Succor(reagan, carlin) and forall x (Causeway(x, reagan) and Succor(reagan, carlin) -> Succor(carlin, reagan)) -> therefore Succor(carlin, reagan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The dorthea blank the hayden. The dorthea father the hayden. The hayden father the dorthea. If someone father the hayden and the hayden blank the dorthea then the hayden father the dorthea. If someone butter the hayden then they are screwball. If the dorthea butter the hayden then the hayden blank the dorthea. If someone blank the hayden and the hayden butter the dorthea then the dorthea butter the hayden. If someone father the hayden then the hayden butter the dorthea. If someone father the dorthea then they eat the dorthea. The dorthea is screwball.", "logic": "\nBlank(dorthea, hayden)\nFather(dorthea, hayden)\nFather(hayden, dorthea)\nforall x (Father(x, hayden) and Blank(hayden, dorthea) -> Father(hayden, dorthea))\nforall x (Butter(x, hayden) -> Screwball(x))\nButter(dorthea, hayden) -> Blank(hayden, dorthea)\nforall x (Blank(x, hayden) and Butter(hayden, dorthea) -> Butter(dorthea, hayden))\nforall x (Father(x, hayden) -> Butter(hayden, dorthea))\nforall x (Father(x, dorthea) -> Blank(x, dorthea))\n\nScrewball(dorthea)\n\nFather(dorthea, hayden) and forall x (Father(x, hayden) -> Butter(hayden, dorthea)) -> therefore Butter(hayden, dorthea) Blank(dorthea, hayden) and Butter(hayden, dorthea) and forall x (Blank(x, hayden) and Butter(hayden, dorthea) -> Butter(dorthea, hayden)) -> therefore Butter(dorthea, hayden) Butter(dorthea, hayden) and forall x (Butter(x, hayden) -> Screwball(x)) -> therefore Screwball(dorthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The rufus skimcoat the jonie. The rufus flay the jonie. The jonie flay the rufus. If someone flay the jonie and the jonie skimcoat the rufus then the jonie flay the rufus. If someone dictate the jonie then they are anaphoric. If the rufus dictate the jonie then the jonie skimcoat the rufus. If someone skimcoat the jonie and the jonie dictate the rufus then the rufus dictate the jonie. If someone flay the jonie then the jonie dictate the rufus. If someone flay the rufus then they eat the rufus. The rufus is not anaphoric.", "logic": "\nSkimcoat(rufus, jonie)\nFlay(rufus, jonie)\nFlay(jonie, rufus)\nforall x (Flay(x, jonie) and Skimcoat(jonie, rufus) -> Flay(jonie, rufus))\nforall x (Dictate(x, jonie) -> Anaphoric(x))\nDictate(rufus, jonie) -> Skimcoat(jonie, rufus)\nforall x (Skimcoat(x, jonie) and Dictate(jonie, rufus) -> Dictate(rufus, jonie))\nforall x (Flay(x, jonie) -> Dictate(jonie, rufus))\nforall x (Flay(x, rufus) -> Skimcoat(x, rufus))\n\nnot Anaphoric(rufus)\n\nFlay(rufus, jonie) and forall x (Flay(x, jonie) -> Dictate(jonie, rufus)) -> therefore Dictate(jonie, rufus) Skimcoat(rufus, jonie) and Dictate(jonie, rufus) and forall x (Skimcoat(x, jonie) and Dictate(jonie, rufus) -> Dictate(rufus, jonie)) -> therefore Dictate(rufus, jonie) Dictate(rufus, jonie) and forall x (Dictate(x, jonie) -> Anaphoric(x)) -> therefore Anaphoric(rufus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The kirby badger the lon. The kirby sledge the lon. The lon sledge the kirby. If someone sledge the lon and the lon badger the kirby then the lon sledge the kirby. If someone scallop the lon then they are analytical. If the kirby scallop the lon then the lon badger the kirby. If someone badger the lon and the lon scallop the kirby then the kirby scallop the lon. If someone sledge the lon then the lon scallop the kirby. If someone sledge the kirby then they eat the kirby. The lon is not analytical.", "logic": "\nBadger(kirby, lon)\nSledge(kirby, lon)\nSledge(lon, kirby)\nforall x (Sledge(x, lon) and Badger(lon, kirby) -> Sledge(lon, kirby))\nforall x (Scallop(x, lon) -> Analytical(x))\nScallop(kirby, lon) -> Badger(lon, kirby)\nforall x (Badger(x, lon) and Scallop(lon, kirby) -> Scallop(kirby, lon))\nforall x (Sledge(x, lon) -> Scallop(lon, kirby))\nforall x (Sledge(x, kirby) -> Badger(x, kirby))\n\nnot Analytical(lon)\n\nforall x (Scallop(x, lon) -> Analytical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The ezekiel prelude the nikolia. The ezekiel waddle the nikolia. The nikolia waddle the ezekiel. If someone waddle the nikolia and the nikolia prelude the ezekiel then the nikolia waddle the ezekiel. If someone slouch the nikolia then they are zymotic. If the ezekiel slouch the nikolia then the nikolia prelude the ezekiel. If someone prelude the nikolia and the nikolia slouch the ezekiel then the ezekiel slouch the nikolia. If someone waddle the nikolia then the nikolia slouch the ezekiel. If someone waddle the ezekiel then they eat the ezekiel. The ezekiel prelude the ezekiel.", "logic": "\nPrelude(ezekiel, nikolia)\nWaddle(ezekiel, nikolia)\nWaddle(nikolia, ezekiel)\nforall x (Waddle(x, nikolia) and Prelude(nikolia, ezekiel) -> Waddle(nikolia, ezekiel))\nforall x (Slouch(x, nikolia) -> Zymotic(x))\nSlouch(ezekiel, nikolia) -> Prelude(nikolia, ezekiel)\nforall x (Prelude(x, nikolia) and Slouch(nikolia, ezekiel) -> Slouch(ezekiel, nikolia))\nforall x (Waddle(x, nikolia) -> Slouch(nikolia, ezekiel))\nforall x (Waddle(x, ezekiel) -> Prelude(x, ezekiel))\n\nPrelude(ezekiel, ezekiel)\n\nforall x (Waddle(x, ezekiel) -> Prelude(x, ezekiel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The kathye flick the sunshine. The kathye bunch the sunshine. The sunshine bunch the kathye. If someone bunch the sunshine and the sunshine flick the kathye then the sunshine bunch the kathye. If someone squawk the sunshine then they are analyzable. If the kathye squawk the sunshine then the sunshine flick the kathye. If someone flick the sunshine and the sunshine squawk the kathye then the kathye squawk the sunshine. If someone bunch the sunshine then the sunshine squawk the kathye. If someone bunch the kathye then they eat the kathye. The sunshine does not see the sunshine.", "logic": "\nFlick(kathye, sunshine)\nBunch(kathye, sunshine)\nBunch(sunshine, kathye)\nforall x (Bunch(x, sunshine) and Flick(sunshine, kathye) -> Bunch(sunshine, kathye))\nforall x (Squawk(x, sunshine) -> Analyzable(x))\nSquawk(kathye, sunshine) -> Flick(sunshine, kathye)\nforall x (Flick(x, sunshine) and Squawk(sunshine, kathye) -> Squawk(kathye, sunshine))\nforall x (Bunch(x, sunshine) -> Squawk(sunshine, kathye))\nforall x (Bunch(x, kathye) -> Flick(x, kathye))\n\nnot Bunch(sunshine, sunshine)\n\nnot Bunch(sunshine, sunshine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The willette revere the devon. The willette surmount the devon. The devon surmount the willette. If someone surmount the devon and the devon revere the willette then the devon surmount the willette. If someone cloister the devon then they are crossed. If the willette cloister the devon then the devon revere the willette. If someone revere the devon and the devon cloister the willette then the willette cloister the devon. If someone surmount the devon then the devon cloister the willette. If someone surmount the willette then they eat the willette. The devon cloister the devon.", "logic": "\nRevere(willette, devon)\nSurmount(willette, devon)\nSurmount(devon, willette)\nforall x (Surmount(x, devon) and Revere(devon, willette) -> Surmount(devon, willette))\nforall x (Cloister(x, devon) -> Crossed(x))\nCloister(willette, devon) -> Revere(devon, willette)\nforall x (Revere(x, devon) and Cloister(devon, willette) -> Cloister(willette, devon))\nforall x (Surmount(x, devon) -> Cloister(devon, willette))\nforall x (Surmount(x, willette) -> Revere(x, willette))\n\nCloister(devon, devon)\n\nCloister(devon, devon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The horatia beguile the cleva. The horatia isomerize the cleva. The cleva isomerize the horatia. If someone isomerize the cleva and the cleva beguile the horatia then the cleva isomerize the horatia. If someone neutralise the cleva then they are ashy. If the horatia neutralise the cleva then the cleva beguile the horatia. If someone beguile the cleva and the cleva neutralise the horatia then the horatia neutralise the cleva. If someone isomerize the cleva then the cleva neutralise the horatia. If someone isomerize the horatia then they eat the horatia. The horatia is not green.", "logic": "\nBeguile(horatia, cleva)\nIsomerize(horatia, cleva)\nIsomerize(cleva, horatia)\nforall x (Isomerize(x, cleva) and Beguile(cleva, horatia) -> Isomerize(cleva, horatia))\nforall x (Neutralise(x, cleva) -> Ashy(x))\nNeutralise(horatia, cleva) -> Beguile(cleva, horatia)\nforall x (Beguile(x, cleva) and Neutralise(cleva, horatia) -> Neutralise(horatia, cleva))\nforall x (Isomerize(x, cleva) -> Neutralise(cleva, horatia))\nforall x (Isomerize(x, horatia) -> Beguile(x, horatia))\n\nnot Green(horatia)\n\nnot Green(horatia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The reggis sacrifice the rusty. The reggis bird the rusty. The rusty bird the reggis. If someone bird the rusty and the rusty sacrifice the reggis then the rusty bird the reggis. If someone observe the rusty then they are untangled. If the reggis observe the rusty then the rusty sacrifice the reggis. If someone sacrifice the rusty and the rusty observe the reggis then the reggis observe the rusty. If someone bird the rusty then the rusty observe the reggis. If someone bird the reggis then they eat the reggis. The reggis is rough.", "logic": "\nSacrifice(reggis, rusty)\nBird(reggis, rusty)\nBird(rusty, reggis)\nforall x (Bird(x, rusty) and Sacrifice(rusty, reggis) -> Bird(rusty, reggis))\nforall x (Observe(x, rusty) -> Untangled(x))\nObserve(reggis, rusty) -> Sacrifice(rusty, reggis)\nforall x (Sacrifice(x, rusty) and Observe(rusty, reggis) -> Observe(reggis, rusty))\nforall x (Bird(x, rusty) -> Observe(rusty, reggis))\nforall x (Bird(x, reggis) -> Sacrifice(x, reggis))\n\nRough(reggis)\n\nRough(reggis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The dotti accumulate the rikki. The dotti bully the rikki. The rikki bully the dotti. If someone bully the rikki and the rikki accumulate the dotti then the rikki bully the dotti. If someone spurt the rikki then they are aslant. If the dotti spurt the rikki then the rikki accumulate the dotti. If someone accumulate the rikki and the rikki spurt the dotti then the dotti spurt the rikki. If someone bully the rikki then the rikki spurt the dotti. If someone bully the dotti then they eat the dotti. The dotti does not see the dotti.", "logic": "\nAccumulate(dotti, rikki)\nBully(dotti, rikki)\nBully(rikki, dotti)\nforall x (Bully(x, rikki) and Accumulate(rikki, dotti) -> Bully(rikki, dotti))\nforall x (Spurt(x, rikki) -> Aslant(x))\nSpurt(dotti, rikki) -> Accumulate(rikki, dotti)\nforall x (Accumulate(x, rikki) and Spurt(rikki, dotti) -> Spurt(dotti, rikki))\nforall x (Bully(x, rikki) -> Spurt(rikki, dotti))\nforall x (Bully(x, dotti) -> Accumulate(x, dotti))\n\nnot Bully(dotti, dotti)\n\nnot Bully(dotti, dotti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The augie bedevil the milli. The augie aromatize the milli. The milli aromatize the augie. If someone aromatize the milli and the milli bedevil the augie then the milli aromatize the augie. If someone tidy the milli then they are chief. If the augie tidy the milli then the milli bedevil the augie. If someone bedevil the milli and the milli tidy the augie then the augie tidy the milli. If someone aromatize the milli then the milli tidy the augie. If someone aromatize the augie then they eat the augie. The milli bedevil the milli.", "logic": "\nBedevil(augie, milli)\nAromatize(augie, milli)\nAromatize(milli, augie)\nforall x (Aromatize(x, milli) and Bedevil(milli, augie) -> Aromatize(milli, augie))\nforall x (Tidy(x, milli) -> Chief(x))\nTidy(augie, milli) -> Bedevil(milli, augie)\nforall x (Bedevil(x, milli) and Tidy(milli, augie) -> Tidy(augie, milli))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, milli) -> Tidy(milli, augie))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, augie) -> Bedevil(x, augie))\n\nBedevil(milli, milli)\n\nBedevil(milli, milli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1099"} {"premises": "The dodi monitor the aline. The dodi fate the aline. The aline is riemannian. If something is riemannian then it fate the aline. If something sojourn the dodi then it does not like the aline. If something monitor the aline then it fate the aline. If the aline monitor the dodi then the dodi sojourn the aline. If something is bungaloid then it does not like the dodi. If something monitor the dodi then it is bungaloid. The dodi fate the aline.", "logic": "\nMonitor(dodi, aline)\nFate(dodi, aline)\nRiemannian(aline)\nforall x (Riemannian(x) -> Fate(x, aline))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, dodi) -> not Fate(x, aline))\nforall x (Monitor(x, aline) -> Fate(x, aline))\nMonitor(aline, dodi) -> Sojourn(dodi, aline)\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) -> not Fate(x, dodi))\nforall x (Monitor(x, dodi) -> Bungaloid(x))\n\nFate(dodi, aline)\n\ntherefore Fate(dodi, aline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4531"} {"premises": "The veronika skulk the tedra. The veronika overtax the tedra. The tedra is mown. If something is mown then it overtax the tedra. If something samba the veronika then it does not like the tedra. If something skulk the tedra then it overtax the tedra. If the tedra skulk the veronika then the veronika samba the tedra. If something is recreant then it does not like the veronika. If something skulk the veronika then it is recreant. The tedra is not mown.", "logic": "\nSkulk(veronika, tedra)\nOvertax(veronika, tedra)\nMown(tedra)\nforall x (Mown(x) -> Overtax(x, tedra))\nforall x (Samba(x, veronika) -> not Overtax(x, tedra))\nforall x (Skulk(x, tedra) -> Overtax(x, tedra))\nSkulk(tedra, veronika) -> Samba(veronika, tedra)\nforall x (Recreant(x) -> not Overtax(x, veronika))\nforall x (Skulk(x, veronika) -> Recreant(x))\n\nnot Mown(tedra)\n\ntherefore Mown(tedra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4531"} {"premises": "The lisetta gauge the becca. The lisetta alkalise the becca. The becca is tetchy. If something is tetchy then it alkalise the becca. If something lipstick the lisetta then it does not like the becca. If something gauge the becca then it alkalise the becca. If the becca gauge the lisetta then the lisetta lipstick the becca. If something is mesial then it does not like the lisetta. If something gauge the lisetta then it is mesial. The becca is not mesial.", "logic": "\nGauge(lisetta, becca)\nAlkalise(lisetta, becca)\nTetchy(becca)\nforall x (Tetchy(x) -> Alkalise(x, becca))\nforall x (Lipstick(x, lisetta) -> not Alkalise(x, becca))\nforall x (Gauge(x, becca) -> Alkalise(x, becca))\nGauge(becca, lisetta) -> Lipstick(lisetta, becca)\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> not Alkalise(x, lisetta))\nforall x (Gauge(x, lisetta) -> Mesial(x))\n\nnot Mesial(becca)\n\nforall x (Gauge(x, lisetta) -> Mesial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4531"} {"premises": "The gabbi unarm the waylen. The gabbi lighten the waylen. The waylen is quondam. If something is quondam then it lighten the waylen. If something wriggle the gabbi then it does not like the waylen. If something unarm the waylen then it lighten the waylen. If the waylen unarm the gabbi then the gabbi wriggle the waylen. If something is mushy then it does not like the gabbi. If something unarm the gabbi then it is mushy. The waylen wriggle the gabbi.", "logic": "\nUnarm(gabbi, waylen)\nLighten(gabbi, waylen)\nQuondam(waylen)\nforall x (Quondam(x) -> Lighten(x, waylen))\nforall x (Wriggle(x, gabbi) -> not Lighten(x, waylen))\nforall x (Unarm(x, waylen) -> Lighten(x, waylen))\nUnarm(waylen, gabbi) -> Wriggle(gabbi, waylen)\nforall x (Mushy(x) -> not Lighten(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Unarm(x, gabbi) -> Mushy(x))\n\nWriggle(waylen, gabbi)\n\nWriggle(waylen, gabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4531"} {"premises": "The willy is areal. The willy is stovepiped. The willy is puissant. The willy is tanzanian. The willy is capetian. All stovepiped people are capetian. All puissant people are areal. Round, puissant people are stovepiped. The willy is areal.", "logic": "\nAreal(willy)\nStovepiped(willy)\nPuissant(willy)\nTanzanian(willy)\nCapetian(willy)\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Capetian(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) -> Areal(x))\nforall x (Capetian(x) and Puissant(x) -> Stovepiped(x))\n\nAreal(willy)\n\ntherefore Areal(willy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5447"} {"premises": "The shepherd is tutelar. The shepherd is emulous. The shepherd is packable. The shepherd is chummy. The shepherd is topical. All emulous people are topical. All packable people are tutelar. Round, packable people are emulous. The shepherd is not emulous.", "logic": "\nTutelar(shepherd)\nEmulous(shepherd)\nPackable(shepherd)\nChummy(shepherd)\nTopical(shepherd)\nforall x (Emulous(x) -> Topical(x))\nforall x (Packable(x) -> Tutelar(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) and Packable(x) -> Emulous(x))\n\nnot Emulous(shepherd)\n\ntherefore Emulous(shepherd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5447"} {"premises": "The zebulen is convenient. The zebulen is monotone. The zebulen is combustive. The zebulen is adjuvant. The zebulen is orienting. All monotone people are orienting. All combustive people are convenient. Round, combustive people are monotone. The zebulen does not need the zebulen.", "logic": "\nConvenient(zebulen)\nMonotone(zebulen)\nCombustive(zebulen)\nAdjuvant(zebulen)\nOrienting(zebulen)\nforall x (Monotone(x) -> Orienting(x))\nforall x (Combustive(x) -> Convenient(x))\nforall x (Orienting(x) and Combustive(x) -> Monotone(x))\n\nnot Needs(zebulen, zebulen)\n\nnot Needs(zebulen, zebulen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5447"} {"premises": "The clem is nonuniform. The clem is pyretic. The clem is wealthy. The clem is currish. The clem is portuguese. All pyretic people are portuguese. All wealthy people are nonuniform. Round, wealthy people are pyretic. The clem chases the clem.", "logic": "\nNonuniform(clem)\nPyretic(clem)\nWealthy(clem)\nCurrish(clem)\nPortuguese(clem)\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Portuguese(x))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) -> Nonuniform(x))\nforall x (Portuguese(x) and Wealthy(x) -> Pyretic(x))\n\nChases(clem, clem)\n\nChases(clem, clem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5447"} {"premises": "Kira is shingly. Kira is ghanese. Kira is thalloid. If Kira is shingly and Kira is thalloid then Kira is ghanese. If something is parvenue and rife then it is shingly. If Kira is rife and Kira is ghanese then Kira is not shingly. Smart things are parvenue. Furry things are thalloid. If something is ghanese then it is working. If something is parvenue and shingly then it is tsarist. All tsarist things are ghanese. Kira is shingly.", "logic": "\nShingly(kira)\nGhanese(kira)\nThalloid(kira)\nShingly(kira) and Thalloid(kira) -> Ghanese(kira)\nforall x (Parvenue(x) and Rife(x) -> Shingly(x))\nRife(kira) and Ghanese(kira) -> not Shingly(kira)\nforall x (Working(x) -> Parvenue(x))\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Thalloid(x))\nforall x (Ghanese(x) -> Working(x))\nforall x (Parvenue(x) and Shingly(x) -> Tsarist(x))\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Ghanese(x))\n\nShingly(kira)\n\ntherefore Shingly(kira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Forester is softening. Forester is lucrative. Forester is wrecked. If Forester is softening and Forester is wrecked then Forester is lucrative. If something is turkic and matutinal then it is softening. If Forester is matutinal and Forester is lucrative then Forester is not softening. Smart things are turkic. Furry things are wrecked. If something is lucrative then it is heartfelt. If something is turkic and softening then it is exploded. All exploded things are lucrative. Forester is not lucrative.", "logic": "\nSoftening(forester)\nLucrative(forester)\nWrecked(forester)\nSoftening(forester) and Wrecked(forester) -> Lucrative(forester)\nforall x (Turkic(x) and Matutinal(x) -> Softening(x))\nMatutinal(forester) and Lucrative(forester) -> not Softening(forester)\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) -> Turkic(x))\nforall x (Softening(x) -> Wrecked(x))\nforall x (Lucrative(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Turkic(x) and Softening(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Lucrative(x))\n\nnot Lucrative(forester)\n\ntherefore Lucrative(forester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Ripley is laputan. Ripley is mantic. Ripley is omissible. If Ripley is laputan and Ripley is omissible then Ripley is mantic. If something is desultory and immune then it is laputan. If Ripley is immune and Ripley is mantic then Ripley is not laputan. Smart things are desultory. Furry things are omissible. If something is mantic then it is impalpable. If something is desultory and laputan then it is scandalous. All scandalous things are mantic. Ripley is impalpable.", "logic": "\nLaputan(ripley)\nMantic(ripley)\nOmissible(ripley)\nLaputan(ripley) and Omissible(ripley) -> Mantic(ripley)\nforall x (Desultory(x) and Immune(x) -> Laputan(x))\nImmune(ripley) and Mantic(ripley) -> not Laputan(ripley)\nforall x (Impalpable(x) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Laputan(x) -> Omissible(x))\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Impalpable(x))\nforall x (Desultory(x) and Laputan(x) -> Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Scandalous(x) -> Mantic(x))\n\nImpalpable(ripley)\n\nMantic(ripley) and forall x (Mantic(x) -> Impalpable(x)) -> therefore Impalpable(ripley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Cleo is prenatal. Cleo is stubborn. Cleo is arid. If Cleo is prenatal and Cleo is arid then Cleo is stubborn. If something is peachy and totaled then it is prenatal. If Cleo is totaled and Cleo is stubborn then Cleo is not prenatal. Smart things are peachy. Furry things are arid. If something is stubborn then it is radiate. If something is peachy and prenatal then it is grazed. All grazed things are stubborn. Cleo is not radiate.", "logic": "\nPrenatal(cleo)\nStubborn(cleo)\nArid(cleo)\nPrenatal(cleo) and Arid(cleo) -> Stubborn(cleo)\nforall x (Peachy(x) and Totaled(x) -> Prenatal(x))\nTotaled(cleo) and Stubborn(cleo) -> not Prenatal(cleo)\nforall x (Radiate(x) -> Peachy(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) -> Arid(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Radiate(x))\nforall x (Peachy(x) and Prenatal(x) -> Grazed(x))\nforall x (Grazed(x) -> Stubborn(x))\n\nnot Radiate(cleo)\n\nStubborn(cleo) and forall x (Stubborn(x) -> Radiate(x)) -> therefore Radiate(cleo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Ernie is bicorned. Ernie is crinoid. Ernie is yearlong. If Ernie is bicorned and Ernie is yearlong then Ernie is crinoid. If something is sagittate and rootbound then it is bicorned. If Ernie is rootbound and Ernie is crinoid then Ernie is not bicorned. Smart things are sagittate. Furry things are yearlong. If something is crinoid then it is benzoic. If something is sagittate and bicorned then it is hind. All hind things are crinoid. Ernie is sagittate.", "logic": "\nBicorned(ernie)\nCrinoid(ernie)\nYearlong(ernie)\nBicorned(ernie) and Yearlong(ernie) -> Crinoid(ernie)\nforall x (Sagittate(x) and Rootbound(x) -> Bicorned(x))\nRootbound(ernie) and Crinoid(ernie) -> not Bicorned(ernie)\nforall x (Benzoic(x) -> Sagittate(x))\nforall x (Bicorned(x) -> Yearlong(x))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) -> Benzoic(x))\nforall x (Sagittate(x) and Bicorned(x) -> Hind(x))\nforall x (Hind(x) -> Crinoid(x))\n\nSagittate(ernie)\n\nCrinoid(ernie) and forall x (Crinoid(x) -> Benzoic(x)) -> therefore Benzoic(ernie) Benzoic(ernie) and forall x (Benzoic(x) -> Sagittate(x)) -> therefore Sagittate(ernie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Jay is incised. Jay is athirst. Jay is rouged. If Jay is incised and Jay is rouged then Jay is athirst. If something is tawny and lathery then it is incised. If Jay is lathery and Jay is athirst then Jay is not incised. Smart things are tawny. Furry things are rouged. If something is athirst then it is equanimous. If something is tawny and incised then it is tertian. All tertian things are athirst. Jay is not tawny.", "logic": "\nIncised(jay)\nAthirst(jay)\nRouged(jay)\nIncised(jay) and Rouged(jay) -> Athirst(jay)\nforall x (Tawny(x) and Lathery(x) -> Incised(x))\nLathery(jay) and Athirst(jay) -> not Incised(jay)\nforall x (Equanimous(x) -> Tawny(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) -> Rouged(x))\nforall x (Athirst(x) -> Equanimous(x))\nforall x (Tawny(x) and Incised(x) -> Tertian(x))\nforall x (Tertian(x) -> Athirst(x))\n\nnot Tawny(jay)\n\nAthirst(jay) and forall x (Athirst(x) -> Equanimous(x)) -> therefore Equanimous(jay) Equanimous(jay) and forall x (Equanimous(x) -> Tawny(x)) -> therefore Tawny(jay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Paulie is excitant. Paulie is unsyllabic. Paulie is roughshod. If Paulie is excitant and Paulie is roughshod then Paulie is unsyllabic. If something is floating and rearward then it is excitant. If Paulie is rearward and Paulie is unsyllabic then Paulie is not excitant. Smart things are floating. Furry things are roughshod. If something is unsyllabic then it is unmanful. If something is floating and excitant then it is stoic. All stoic things are unsyllabic. Paulie is stoic.", "logic": "\nExcitant(paulie)\nUnsyllabic(paulie)\nRoughshod(paulie)\nExcitant(paulie) and Roughshod(paulie) -> Unsyllabic(paulie)\nforall x (Floating(x) and Rearward(x) -> Excitant(x))\nRearward(paulie) and Unsyllabic(paulie) -> not Excitant(paulie)\nforall x (Unmanful(x) -> Floating(x))\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> Unmanful(x))\nforall x (Floating(x) and Excitant(x) -> Stoic(x))\nforall x (Stoic(x) -> Unsyllabic(x))\n\nStoic(paulie)\n\nUnsyllabic(paulie) and forall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> Unmanful(x)) -> therefore Unmanful(paulie) Unmanful(paulie) and forall x (Unmanful(x) -> Floating(x)) -> therefore Floating(paulie) Floating(paulie) and Excitant(paulie) and forall x (Floating(x) and Excitant(x) -> Stoic(x)) -> therefore Stoic(paulie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Katrinka is handleless. Katrinka is armless. Katrinka is clumsy. If Katrinka is handleless and Katrinka is clumsy then Katrinka is armless. If something is blotto and bottomed then it is handleless. If Katrinka is bottomed and Katrinka is armless then Katrinka is not handleless. Smart things are blotto. Furry things are clumsy. If something is armless then it is pietistic. If something is blotto and handleless then it is nascent. All nascent things are armless. Katrinka is not nascent.", "logic": "\nHandleless(katrinka)\nArmless(katrinka)\nClumsy(katrinka)\nHandleless(katrinka) and Clumsy(katrinka) -> Armless(katrinka)\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Bottomed(x) -> Handleless(x))\nBottomed(katrinka) and Armless(katrinka) -> not Handleless(katrinka)\nforall x (Pietistic(x) -> Blotto(x))\nforall x (Handleless(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) -> Pietistic(x))\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Handleless(x) -> Nascent(x))\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> Armless(x))\n\nnot Nascent(katrinka)\n\nArmless(katrinka) and forall x (Armless(x) -> Pietistic(x)) -> therefore Pietistic(katrinka) Pietistic(katrinka) and forall x (Pietistic(x) -> Blotto(x)) -> therefore Blotto(katrinka) Blotto(katrinka) and Handleless(katrinka) and forall x (Blotto(x) and Handleless(x) -> Nascent(x)) -> therefore Nascent(katrinka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1463"} {"premises": "Kaye is aeriferous. Kaye is saxatile. Kaye is circinate. Kaye is lactating. Kaye is forested. Britni is anorexic. Britni is wavelike. Britni is saxatile. Britni is circinate. Britni is lactating. All forested, aeriferous people are saxatile. Nice, anorexic people are lactating. If Britni is saxatile then Britni is lactating. All lactating, wavelike people are anorexic. All circinate people are saxatile. If Kaye is anorexic and Kaye is saxatile then Kaye is lactating. If someone is wavelike and forested then they are saxatile. If Britni is saxatile then Britni is circinate. Kaye is saxatile.", "logic": "\nAeriferous(kaye)\nSaxatile(kaye)\nCircinate(kaye)\nLactating(kaye)\nForested(kaye)\nAnorexic(britni)\nWavelike(britni)\nSaxatile(britni)\nCircinate(britni)\nLactating(britni)\nforall x (Forested(x) and Aeriferous(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) and Anorexic(x) -> Lactating(x))\nSaxatile(britni) -> Lactating(britni)\nforall x (Lactating(x) and Wavelike(x) -> Anorexic(x))\nforall x (Circinate(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nAnorexic(kaye) and Saxatile(kaye) -> Lactating(kaye)\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and Forested(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nSaxatile(britni) -> Circinate(britni)\n\nSaxatile(kaye)\n\ntherefore Saxatile(kaye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6527"} {"premises": "Renaud is uncivil. Renaud is unhealed. Renaud is wholesale. Renaud is sororal. Renaud is subaltern. Bruno is algid. Bruno is coagulate. Bruno is unhealed. Bruno is wholesale. Bruno is sororal. All subaltern, uncivil people are unhealed. Nice, algid people are sororal. If Bruno is unhealed then Bruno is sororal. All sororal, coagulate people are algid. All wholesale people are unhealed. If Renaud is algid and Renaud is unhealed then Renaud is sororal. If someone is coagulate and subaltern then they are unhealed. If Bruno is unhealed then Bruno is wholesale. Bruno is not unhealed.", "logic": "\nUncivil(renaud)\nUnhealed(renaud)\nWholesale(renaud)\nSororal(renaud)\nSubaltern(renaud)\nAlgid(bruno)\nCoagulate(bruno)\nUnhealed(bruno)\nWholesale(bruno)\nSororal(bruno)\nforall x (Subaltern(x) and Uncivil(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Uncivil(x) and Algid(x) -> Sororal(x))\nUnhealed(bruno) -> Sororal(bruno)\nforall x (Sororal(x) and Coagulate(x) -> Algid(x))\nforall x (Wholesale(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nAlgid(renaud) and Unhealed(renaud) -> Sororal(renaud)\nforall x (Coagulate(x) and Subaltern(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nUnhealed(bruno) -> Wholesale(bruno)\n\nnot Unhealed(bruno)\n\ntherefore Unhealed(bruno)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6527"} {"premises": "Terrie is readable. Terrie is unsuitable. Terrie is slumbrous. Terrie is ariled. Terrie is leggy. Arlina is sundried. Arlina is scapular. Arlina is unsuitable. Arlina is slumbrous. Arlina is ariled. All leggy, readable people are unsuitable. Nice, sundried people are ariled. If Arlina is unsuitable then Arlina is ariled. All ariled, scapular people are sundried. All slumbrous people are unsuitable. If Terrie is sundried and Terrie is unsuitable then Terrie is ariled. If someone is scapular and leggy then they are unsuitable. If Arlina is unsuitable then Arlina is slumbrous. Terrie is not sundried.", "logic": "\nReadable(terrie)\nUnsuitable(terrie)\nSlumbrous(terrie)\nAriled(terrie)\nLeggy(terrie)\nSundried(arlina)\nScapular(arlina)\nUnsuitable(arlina)\nSlumbrous(arlina)\nAriled(arlina)\nforall x (Leggy(x) and Readable(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Readable(x) and Sundried(x) -> Ariled(x))\nUnsuitable(arlina) -> Ariled(arlina)\nforall x (Ariled(x) and Scapular(x) -> Sundried(x))\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nSundried(terrie) and Unsuitable(terrie) -> Ariled(terrie)\nforall x (Scapular(x) and Leggy(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nUnsuitable(arlina) -> Slumbrous(arlina)\n\nnot Sundried(terrie)\n\nforall x (Ariled(x) and Scapular(x) -> Sundried(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6527"} {"premises": "Ronica is torrid. Ronica is enervating. Ronica is bellied. Ronica is tabu. Ronica is twoscore. Vanny is atrocious. Vanny is dutch. Vanny is enervating. Vanny is bellied. Vanny is tabu. All twoscore, torrid people are enervating. Nice, atrocious people are tabu. If Vanny is enervating then Vanny is tabu. All tabu, dutch people are atrocious. All bellied people are enervating. If Ronica is atrocious and Ronica is enervating then Ronica is tabu. If someone is dutch and twoscore then they are enervating. If Vanny is enervating then Vanny is bellied. Vanny is torrid.", "logic": "\nTorrid(ronica)\nEnervating(ronica)\nBellied(ronica)\nTabu(ronica)\nTwoscore(ronica)\nAtrocious(vanny)\nDutch(vanny)\nEnervating(vanny)\nBellied(vanny)\nTabu(vanny)\nforall x (Twoscore(x) and Torrid(x) -> Enervating(x))\nforall x (Torrid(x) and Atrocious(x) -> Tabu(x))\nEnervating(vanny) -> Tabu(vanny)\nforall x (Tabu(x) and Dutch(x) -> Atrocious(x))\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> Enervating(x))\nAtrocious(ronica) and Enervating(ronica) -> Tabu(ronica)\nforall x (Dutch(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Enervating(x))\nEnervating(vanny) -> Bellied(vanny)\n\nTorrid(vanny)\n\nTorrid(vanny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6527"} {"premises": "The phelia nose the karyl. The phelia does not chase the amalie. The phelia is mossy. The phelia intersect the amalie. The phelia combust the karyl. The phelia combust the amalie. The karyl nose the phelia. The karyl nose the amalie. The karyl is luminous. The karyl intersect the phelia. The karyl intersect the amalie. The amalie nose the karyl. The amalie is mossy. The amalie intersect the karyl. The amalie combust the karyl. If someone combust the amalie and they do not see the phelia then they chase the amalie. The karyl nose the amalie.", "logic": "\nNose(phelia, karyl)\nnot Nose(phelia, amalie)\nMossy(phelia)\nIntersect(phelia, amalie)\nCombust(phelia, karyl)\nCombust(phelia, amalie)\nNose(karyl, phelia)\nNose(karyl, amalie)\nLuminous(karyl)\nIntersect(karyl, phelia)\nIntersect(karyl, amalie)\nNose(amalie, karyl)\nMossy(amalie)\nIntersect(amalie, karyl)\nCombust(amalie, karyl)\nforall x (Combust(x, amalie) and not Intersect(x, phelia) -> Nose(x, amalie))\n\nNose(karyl, amalie)\n\ntherefore Nose(karyl, amalie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3380"} {"premises": "The darlene canonize the kayle. The darlene does not chase the vena. The darlene is uncovered. The darlene cater the vena. The darlene socialize the kayle. The darlene socialize the vena. The kayle canonize the darlene. The kayle canonize the vena. The kayle is together. The kayle cater the darlene. The kayle cater the vena. The vena canonize the kayle. The vena is uncovered. The vena cater the kayle. The vena socialize the kayle. If someone socialize the vena and they do not see the darlene then they chase the vena. The kayle does not chase the vena.", "logic": "\nCanonize(darlene, kayle)\nnot Canonize(darlene, vena)\nUncovered(darlene)\nCater(darlene, vena)\nSocialize(darlene, kayle)\nSocialize(darlene, vena)\nCanonize(kayle, darlene)\nCanonize(kayle, vena)\nTogether(kayle)\nCater(kayle, darlene)\nCater(kayle, vena)\nCanonize(vena, kayle)\nUncovered(vena)\nCater(vena, kayle)\nSocialize(vena, kayle)\nforall x (Socialize(x, vena) and not Cater(x, darlene) -> Canonize(x, vena))\n\nnot Canonize(kayle, vena)\n\ntherefore Canonize(kayle, vena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3380"} {"premises": "The fania undertake the jen. The fania does not chase the elke. The fania is archival. The fania dehorn the elke. The fania equip the jen. The fania equip the elke. The jen undertake the fania. The jen undertake the elke. The jen is pursued. The jen dehorn the fania. The jen dehorn the elke. The elke undertake the jen. The elke is archival. The elke dehorn the jen. The elke equip the jen. If someone equip the elke and they do not see the fania then they chase the elke. The elke does not chase the elke.", "logic": "\nUndertake(fania, jen)\nnot Undertake(fania, elke)\nArchival(fania)\nDehorn(fania, elke)\nEquip(fania, jen)\nEquip(fania, elke)\nUndertake(jen, fania)\nUndertake(jen, elke)\nPursued(jen)\nDehorn(jen, fania)\nDehorn(jen, elke)\nUndertake(elke, jen)\nArchival(elke)\nDehorn(elke, jen)\nEquip(elke, jen)\nforall x (Equip(x, elke) and not Dehorn(x, fania) -> Undertake(x, elke))\n\nnot Undertake(elke, elke)\n\nforall x (Equip(x, elke) and not Dehorn(x, fania) -> Undertake(x, elke)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3380"} {"premises": "The pincas optimise the cori. The pincas does not chase the pattie. The pincas is lavish. The pincas party the pattie. The pincas curtsy the cori. The pincas curtsy the pattie. The cori optimise the pincas. The cori optimise the pattie. The cori is buteonine. The cori party the pincas. The cori party the pattie. The pattie optimise the cori. The pattie is lavish. The pattie party the cori. The pattie curtsy the cori. If someone curtsy the pattie and they do not see the pincas then they chase the pattie. The pincas is green.", "logic": "\nOptimise(pincas, cori)\nnot Optimise(pincas, pattie)\nLavish(pincas)\nParty(pincas, pattie)\nCurtsy(pincas, cori)\nCurtsy(pincas, pattie)\nOptimise(cori, pincas)\nOptimise(cori, pattie)\nButeonine(cori)\nParty(cori, pincas)\nParty(cori, pattie)\nOptimise(pattie, cori)\nLavish(pattie)\nParty(pattie, cori)\nCurtsy(pattie, cori)\nforall x (Curtsy(x, pattie) and not Party(x, pincas) -> Optimise(x, pattie))\n\nGreen(pincas)\n\nGreen(pincas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3380"} {"premises": "The myrlene is rwandan. The chelsie hunt the myrlene. The aleen felicitate the myrlene. The sheree hunt the myrlene. If someone hunt the aleen then the aleen is not skinned. If someone chloroform the aleen then they do not like the myrlene. All rwandan people are sagacious. If someone hunt the myrlene and the myrlene hunt the aleen then they see the sheree. If someone felicitate the myrlene and the myrlene is not miasmic then they do not like the chelsie. If someone is rwandan then they like the chelsie. If the sheree hunt the myrlene and the myrlene is sagacious then the myrlene chloroform the aleen. If someone felicitate the myrlene then the myrlene is skinned. The sheree hunt the myrlene.", "logic": "\nRwandan(myrlene)\nHunt(chelsie, myrlene)\nFelicitate(aleen, myrlene)\nHunt(sheree, myrlene)\nforall x (Hunt(x, aleen) -> not Skinned(aleen))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, aleen) -> not Felicitate(x, myrlene))\nforall x (Rwandan(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nforall x (Hunt(x, myrlene) and Hunt(myrlene, aleen) -> Chloroform(x, sheree))\nforall x (Felicitate(x, myrlene) and not Miasmic(myrlene) -> not Felicitate(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Rwandan(x) -> Felicitate(x, chelsie))\nHunt(sheree, myrlene) and Sagacious(myrlene) -> Chloroform(myrlene, aleen)\nforall x (Felicitate(x, myrlene) -> Skinned(myrlene))\n\nHunt(sheree, myrlene)\n\ntherefore Hunt(sheree, myrlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The ginni is eastbound. The meriel roost the ginni. The berget bestir the ginni. The douglas roost the ginni. If someone roost the berget then the berget is not barbadian. If someone wrack the berget then they do not like the ginni. All eastbound people are murdered. If someone roost the ginni and the ginni roost the berget then they see the douglas. If someone bestir the ginni and the ginni is not mistakable then they do not like the meriel. If someone is eastbound then they like the meriel. If the douglas roost the ginni and the ginni is murdered then the ginni wrack the berget. If someone bestir the ginni then the ginni is barbadian. The douglas does not chase the ginni.", "logic": "\nEastbound(ginni)\nRoost(meriel, ginni)\nBestir(berget, ginni)\nRoost(douglas, ginni)\nforall x (Roost(x, berget) -> not Barbadian(berget))\nforall x (Wrack(x, berget) -> not Bestir(x, ginni))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Murdered(x))\nforall x (Roost(x, ginni) and Roost(ginni, berget) -> Wrack(x, douglas))\nforall x (Bestir(x, ginni) and not Mistakable(ginni) -> not Bestir(x, meriel))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Bestir(x, meriel))\nRoost(douglas, ginni) and Murdered(ginni) -> Wrack(ginni, berget)\nforall x (Bestir(x, ginni) -> Barbadian(ginni))\n\nnot Roost(douglas, ginni)\n\ntherefore Roost(douglas, ginni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The marwin is southbound. The frannie foreswear the marwin. The isaac background the marwin. The ferinand foreswear the marwin. If someone foreswear the isaac then the isaac is not prudish. If someone consign the isaac then they do not like the marwin. All southbound people are overdue. If someone foreswear the marwin and the marwin foreswear the isaac then they see the ferinand. If someone background the marwin and the marwin is not impeccant then they do not like the frannie. If someone is southbound then they like the frannie. If the ferinand foreswear the marwin and the marwin is overdue then the marwin consign the isaac. If someone background the marwin then the marwin is prudish. The marwin is overdue.", "logic": "\nSouthbound(marwin)\nForeswear(frannie, marwin)\nBackground(isaac, marwin)\nForeswear(ferinand, marwin)\nforall x (Foreswear(x, isaac) -> not Prudish(isaac))\nforall x (Consign(x, isaac) -> not Background(x, marwin))\nforall x (Southbound(x) -> Overdue(x))\nforall x (Foreswear(x, marwin) and Foreswear(marwin, isaac) -> Consign(x, ferinand))\nforall x (Background(x, marwin) and not Impeccant(marwin) -> not Background(x, frannie))\nforall x (Southbound(x) -> Background(x, frannie))\nForeswear(ferinand, marwin) and Overdue(marwin) -> Consign(marwin, isaac)\nforall x (Background(x, marwin) -> Prudish(marwin))\n\nOverdue(marwin)\n\nSouthbound(marwin) and forall x (Southbound(x) -> Overdue(x)) -> therefore Overdue(marwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The geoff is unforested. The althea sleet the geoff. The annice enact the geoff. The renado sleet the geoff. If someone sleet the annice then the annice is not suppliant. If someone fluoridise the annice then they do not like the geoff. All unforested people are sparse. If someone sleet the geoff and the geoff sleet the annice then they see the renado. If someone enact the geoff and the geoff is not metonymic then they do not like the althea. If someone is unforested then they like the althea. If the renado sleet the geoff and the geoff is sparse then the geoff fluoridise the annice. If someone enact the geoff then the geoff is suppliant. The geoff is not sparse.", "logic": "\nUnforested(geoff)\nSleet(althea, geoff)\nEnact(annice, geoff)\nSleet(renado, geoff)\nforall x (Sleet(x, annice) -> not Suppliant(annice))\nforall x (Fluoridise(x, annice) -> not Enact(x, geoff))\nforall x (Unforested(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Sleet(x, geoff) and Sleet(geoff, annice) -> Fluoridise(x, renado))\nforall x (Enact(x, geoff) and not Metonymic(geoff) -> not Enact(x, althea))\nforall x (Unforested(x) -> Enact(x, althea))\nSleet(renado, geoff) and Sparse(geoff) -> Fluoridise(geoff, annice)\nforall x (Enact(x, geoff) -> Suppliant(geoff))\n\nnot Sparse(geoff)\n\nUnforested(geoff) and forall x (Unforested(x) -> Sparse(x)) -> therefore Sparse(geoff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The douglas is eerie. The roscoe bang the douglas. The sada cotton the douglas. The lorene bang the douglas. If someone bang the sada then the sada is not evitable. If someone conserve the sada then they do not like the douglas. All eerie people are pregnant. If someone bang the douglas and the douglas bang the sada then they see the lorene. If someone cotton the douglas and the douglas is not arduous then they do not like the roscoe. If someone is eerie then they like the roscoe. If the lorene bang the douglas and the douglas is pregnant then the douglas conserve the sada. If someone cotton the douglas then the douglas is evitable. The douglas conserve the sada.", "logic": "\nEerie(douglas)\nBang(roscoe, douglas)\nCotton(sada, douglas)\nBang(lorene, douglas)\nforall x (Bang(x, sada) -> not Evitable(sada))\nforall x (Conserve(x, sada) -> not Cotton(x, douglas))\nforall x (Eerie(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Bang(x, douglas) and Bang(douglas, sada) -> Conserve(x, lorene))\nforall x (Cotton(x, douglas) and not Arduous(douglas) -> not Cotton(x, roscoe))\nforall x (Eerie(x) -> Cotton(x, roscoe))\nBang(lorene, douglas) and Pregnant(douglas) -> Conserve(douglas, sada)\nforall x (Cotton(x, douglas) -> Evitable(douglas))\n\nConserve(douglas, sada)\n\nEerie(douglas) and forall x (Eerie(x) -> Pregnant(x)) -> therefore Pregnant(douglas) Bang(lorene, douglas) and Pregnant(douglas) and Bang(lorene, douglas) and Pregnant(douglas) -> Conserve(douglas, sada) -> therefore Conserve(douglas, sada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The jaclin is linked. The melosa satirize the jaclin. The katleen capsulate the jaclin. The cassi satirize the jaclin. If someone satirize the katleen then the katleen is not first. If someone benefit the katleen then they do not like the jaclin. All linked people are ageless. If someone satirize the jaclin and the jaclin satirize the katleen then they see the cassi. If someone capsulate the jaclin and the jaclin is not entitled then they do not like the melosa. If someone is linked then they like the melosa. If the cassi satirize the jaclin and the jaclin is ageless then the jaclin benefit the katleen. If someone capsulate the jaclin then the jaclin is first. The jaclin does not see the katleen.", "logic": "\nLinked(jaclin)\nSatirize(melosa, jaclin)\nCapsulate(katleen, jaclin)\nSatirize(cassi, jaclin)\nforall x (Satirize(x, katleen) -> not First(katleen))\nforall x (Benefit(x, katleen) -> not Capsulate(x, jaclin))\nforall x (Linked(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Satirize(x, jaclin) and Satirize(jaclin, katleen) -> Benefit(x, cassi))\nforall x (Capsulate(x, jaclin) and not Entitled(jaclin) -> not Capsulate(x, melosa))\nforall x (Linked(x) -> Capsulate(x, melosa))\nSatirize(cassi, jaclin) and Ageless(jaclin) -> Benefit(jaclin, katleen)\nforall x (Capsulate(x, jaclin) -> First(jaclin))\n\nnot Benefit(jaclin, katleen)\n\nLinked(jaclin) and forall x (Linked(x) -> Ageless(x)) -> therefore Ageless(jaclin) Satirize(cassi, jaclin) and Ageless(jaclin) and Satirize(cassi, jaclin) and Ageless(jaclin) -> Benefit(jaclin, katleen) -> therefore Benefit(jaclin, katleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The moyna is palladian. The brody resell the moyna. The thorn quench the moyna. The calvin resell the moyna. If someone resell the thorn then the thorn is not emollient. If someone baptize the thorn then they do not like the moyna. All palladian people are impelled. If someone resell the moyna and the moyna resell the thorn then they see the calvin. If someone quench the moyna and the moyna is not obliterate then they do not like the brody. If someone is palladian then they like the brody. If the calvin resell the moyna and the moyna is impelled then the moyna baptize the thorn. If someone quench the moyna then the moyna is emollient. The moyna does not like the moyna.", "logic": "\nPalladian(moyna)\nResell(brody, moyna)\nQuench(thorn, moyna)\nResell(calvin, moyna)\nforall x (Resell(x, thorn) -> not Emollient(thorn))\nforall x (Baptize(x, thorn) -> not Quench(x, moyna))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Impelled(x))\nforall x (Resell(x, moyna) and Resell(moyna, thorn) -> Baptize(x, calvin))\nforall x (Quench(x, moyna) and not Obliterate(moyna) -> not Quench(x, brody))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Quench(x, brody))\nResell(calvin, moyna) and Impelled(moyna) -> Baptize(moyna, thorn)\nforall x (Quench(x, moyna) -> Emollient(moyna))\n\nnot Quench(moyna, moyna)\n\nPalladian(moyna) and forall x (Palladian(x) -> Impelled(x)) -> therefore Impelled(moyna) Resell(calvin, moyna) and Impelled(moyna) and Resell(calvin, moyna) and Impelled(moyna) -> Baptize(moyna, thorn) -> therefore Baptize(moyna, thorn) Baptize(moyna, thorn) and forall x (Baptize(x, thorn) -> not Quench(x, moyna)) -> therefore not Quench(moyna, moyna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The micheline is getable. The osmund neaten the micheline. The jeanine intumesce the micheline. The ginny neaten the micheline. If someone neaten the jeanine then the jeanine is not cloaked. If someone worst the jeanine then they do not like the micheline. All getable people are unarmored. If someone neaten the micheline and the micheline neaten the jeanine then they see the ginny. If someone intumesce the micheline and the micheline is not alacritous then they do not like the osmund. If someone is getable then they like the osmund. If the ginny neaten the micheline and the micheline is unarmored then the micheline worst the jeanine. If someone intumesce the micheline then the micheline is cloaked. The micheline intumesce the micheline.", "logic": "\nGetable(micheline)\nNeaten(osmund, micheline)\nIntumesce(jeanine, micheline)\nNeaten(ginny, micheline)\nforall x (Neaten(x, jeanine) -> not Cloaked(jeanine))\nforall x (Worst(x, jeanine) -> not Intumesce(x, micheline))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Unarmored(x))\nforall x (Neaten(x, micheline) and Neaten(micheline, jeanine) -> Worst(x, ginny))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, micheline) and not Alacritous(micheline) -> not Intumesce(x, osmund))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Intumesce(x, osmund))\nNeaten(ginny, micheline) and Unarmored(micheline) -> Worst(micheline, jeanine)\nforall x (Intumesce(x, micheline) -> Cloaked(micheline))\n\nIntumesce(micheline, micheline)\n\nGetable(micheline) and forall x (Getable(x) -> Unarmored(x)) -> therefore Unarmored(micheline) Neaten(ginny, micheline) and Unarmored(micheline) and Neaten(ginny, micheline) and Unarmored(micheline) -> Worst(micheline, jeanine) -> therefore Worst(micheline, jeanine) Worst(micheline, jeanine) and forall x (Worst(x, jeanine) -> not Intumesce(x, micheline)) -> therefore not Intumesce(micheline, micheline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The sibley is unfilmed. The brina revet the sibley. The kathryne underact the sibley. The alasdair revet the sibley. If someone revet the kathryne then the kathryne is not cotyloidal. If someone laugh the kathryne then they do not like the sibley. All unfilmed people are ciliary. If someone revet the sibley and the sibley revet the kathryne then they see the alasdair. If someone underact the sibley and the sibley is not squishy then they do not like the brina. If someone is unfilmed then they like the brina. If the alasdair revet the sibley and the sibley is ciliary then the sibley laugh the kathryne. If someone underact the sibley then the sibley is cotyloidal. The brina is not ciliary.", "logic": "\nUnfilmed(sibley)\nRevet(brina, sibley)\nUnderact(kathryne, sibley)\nRevet(alasdair, sibley)\nforall x (Revet(x, kathryne) -> not Cotyloidal(kathryne))\nforall x (Laugh(x, kathryne) -> not Underact(x, sibley))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Ciliary(x))\nforall x (Revet(x, sibley) and Revet(sibley, kathryne) -> Laugh(x, alasdair))\nforall x (Underact(x, sibley) and not Squishy(sibley) -> not Underact(x, brina))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Underact(x, brina))\nRevet(alasdair, sibley) and Ciliary(sibley) -> Laugh(sibley, kathryne)\nforall x (Underact(x, sibley) -> Cotyloidal(sibley))\n\nnot Ciliary(brina)\n\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Ciliary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The ladonna is vegetative. The waverly gleam the ladonna. The coral pump the ladonna. The winonah gleam the ladonna. If someone gleam the coral then the coral is not narrowing. If someone constringe the coral then they do not like the ladonna. All vegetative people are senile. If someone gleam the ladonna and the ladonna gleam the coral then they see the winonah. If someone pump the ladonna and the ladonna is not downstair then they do not like the waverly. If someone is vegetative then they like the waverly. If the winonah gleam the ladonna and the ladonna is senile then the ladonna constringe the coral. If someone pump the ladonna then the ladonna is narrowing. The coral pump the waverly.", "logic": "\nVegetative(ladonna)\nGleam(waverly, ladonna)\nPump(coral, ladonna)\nGleam(winonah, ladonna)\nforall x (Gleam(x, coral) -> not Narrowing(coral))\nforall x (Constringe(x, coral) -> not Pump(x, ladonna))\nforall x (Vegetative(x) -> Senile(x))\nforall x (Gleam(x, ladonna) and Gleam(ladonna, coral) -> Constringe(x, winonah))\nforall x (Pump(x, ladonna) and not Downstair(ladonna) -> not Pump(x, waverly))\nforall x (Vegetative(x) -> Pump(x, waverly))\nGleam(winonah, ladonna) and Senile(ladonna) -> Constringe(ladonna, coral)\nforall x (Pump(x, ladonna) -> Narrowing(ladonna))\n\nPump(coral, waverly)\n\nforall x (Vegetative(x) -> Pump(x, waverly)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The viv is fibreoptic. The ellen allegorise the viv. The elwyn enthrall the viv. The adiana allegorise the viv. If someone allegorise the elwyn then the elwyn is not sneezy. If someone research the elwyn then they do not like the viv. All fibreoptic people are sufi. If someone allegorise the viv and the viv allegorise the elwyn then they see the adiana. If someone enthrall the viv and the viv is not doctrinal then they do not like the ellen. If someone is fibreoptic then they like the ellen. If the adiana allegorise the viv and the viv is sufi then the viv research the elwyn. If someone enthrall the viv then the viv is sneezy. The adiana does not see the adiana.", "logic": "\nFibreoptic(viv)\nAllegorise(ellen, viv)\nEnthrall(elwyn, viv)\nAllegorise(adiana, viv)\nforall x (Allegorise(x, elwyn) -> not Sneezy(elwyn))\nforall x (Research(x, elwyn) -> not Enthrall(x, viv))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> Sufi(x))\nforall x (Allegorise(x, viv) and Allegorise(viv, elwyn) -> Research(x, adiana))\nforall x (Enthrall(x, viv) and not Doctrinal(viv) -> not Enthrall(x, ellen))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> Enthrall(x, ellen))\nAllegorise(adiana, viv) and Sufi(viv) -> Research(viv, elwyn)\nforall x (Enthrall(x, viv) -> Sneezy(viv))\n\nnot Research(adiana, adiana)\n\nforall x (Allegorise(x, viv) and Allegorise(viv, elwyn) -> Research(x, adiana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The celeste is braggy. The garp refill the celeste. The rowland antiquate the celeste. The carmina refill the celeste. If someone refill the rowland then the rowland is not becalmed. If someone stridulate the rowland then they do not like the celeste. All braggy people are countywide. If someone refill the celeste and the celeste refill the rowland then they see the carmina. If someone antiquate the celeste and the celeste is not accessible then they do not like the garp. If someone is braggy then they like the garp. If the carmina refill the celeste and the celeste is countywide then the celeste stridulate the rowland. If someone antiquate the celeste then the celeste is becalmed. The rowland is countywide.", "logic": "\nBraggy(celeste)\nRefill(garp, celeste)\nAntiquate(rowland, celeste)\nRefill(carmina, celeste)\nforall x (Refill(x, rowland) -> not Becalmed(rowland))\nforall x (Stridulate(x, rowland) -> not Antiquate(x, celeste))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Countywide(x))\nforall x (Refill(x, celeste) and Refill(celeste, rowland) -> Stridulate(x, carmina))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, celeste) and not Accessible(celeste) -> not Antiquate(x, garp))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Antiquate(x, garp))\nRefill(carmina, celeste) and Countywide(celeste) -> Stridulate(celeste, rowland)\nforall x (Antiquate(x, celeste) -> Becalmed(celeste))\n\nCountywide(rowland)\n\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Countywide(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The norean is dauntless. The dustin posture the norean. The giovanna rumble the norean. The enrique posture the norean. If someone posture the giovanna then the giovanna is not blasted. If someone utilize the giovanna then they do not like the norean. All dauntless people are fusiform. If someone posture the norean and the norean posture the giovanna then they see the enrique. If someone rumble the norean and the norean is not rotational then they do not like the dustin. If someone is dauntless then they like the dustin. If the enrique posture the norean and the norean is fusiform then the norean utilize the giovanna. If someone rumble the norean then the norean is blasted. The dustin does not chase the dustin.", "logic": "\nDauntless(norean)\nPosture(dustin, norean)\nRumble(giovanna, norean)\nPosture(enrique, norean)\nforall x (Posture(x, giovanna) -> not Blasted(giovanna))\nforall x (Utilize(x, giovanna) -> not Rumble(x, norean))\nforall x (Dauntless(x) -> Fusiform(x))\nforall x (Posture(x, norean) and Posture(norean, giovanna) -> Utilize(x, enrique))\nforall x (Rumble(x, norean) and not Rotational(norean) -> not Rumble(x, dustin))\nforall x (Dauntless(x) -> Rumble(x, dustin))\nPosture(enrique, norean) and Fusiform(norean) -> Utilize(norean, giovanna)\nforall x (Rumble(x, norean) -> Blasted(norean))\n\nnot Posture(dustin, dustin)\n\nnot Posture(dustin, dustin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The dietrich is derelict. The noelani verify the dietrich. The elladine pull the dietrich. The fionnula verify the dietrich. If someone verify the elladine then the elladine is not grecian. If someone belly the elladine then they do not like the dietrich. All derelict people are probable. If someone verify the dietrich and the dietrich verify the elladine then they see the fionnula. If someone pull the dietrich and the dietrich is not fell then they do not like the noelani. If someone is derelict then they like the noelani. If the fionnula verify the dietrich and the dietrich is probable then the dietrich belly the elladine. If someone pull the dietrich then the dietrich is grecian. The dietrich verify the noelani.", "logic": "\nDerelict(dietrich)\nVerify(noelani, dietrich)\nPull(elladine, dietrich)\nVerify(fionnula, dietrich)\nforall x (Verify(x, elladine) -> not Grecian(elladine))\nforall x (Belly(x, elladine) -> not Pull(x, dietrich))\nforall x (Derelict(x) -> Probable(x))\nforall x (Verify(x, dietrich) and Verify(dietrich, elladine) -> Belly(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Pull(x, dietrich) and not Fell(dietrich) -> not Pull(x, noelani))\nforall x (Derelict(x) -> Pull(x, noelani))\nVerify(fionnula, dietrich) and Probable(dietrich) -> Belly(dietrich, elladine)\nforall x (Pull(x, dietrich) -> Grecian(dietrich))\n\nVerify(dietrich, noelani)\n\nVerify(dietrich, noelani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The delphine is nonkosher. The lulu pelt the delphine. The bradford carjack the delphine. The damara pelt the delphine. If someone pelt the bradford then the bradford is not spinnable. If someone bias the bradford then they do not like the delphine. All nonkosher people are schmalzy. If someone pelt the delphine and the delphine pelt the bradford then they see the damara. If someone carjack the delphine and the delphine is not resistant then they do not like the lulu. If someone is nonkosher then they like the lulu. If the damara pelt the delphine and the delphine is schmalzy then the delphine bias the bradford. If someone carjack the delphine then the delphine is spinnable. The bradford is not resistant.", "logic": "\nNonkosher(delphine)\nPelt(lulu, delphine)\nCarjack(bradford, delphine)\nPelt(damara, delphine)\nforall x (Pelt(x, bradford) -> not Spinnable(bradford))\nforall x (Bias(x, bradford) -> not Carjack(x, delphine))\nforall x (Nonkosher(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\nforall x (Pelt(x, delphine) and Pelt(delphine, bradford) -> Bias(x, damara))\nforall x (Carjack(x, delphine) and not Resistant(delphine) -> not Carjack(x, lulu))\nforall x (Nonkosher(x) -> Carjack(x, lulu))\nPelt(damara, delphine) and Schmalzy(delphine) -> Bias(delphine, bradford)\nforall x (Carjack(x, delphine) -> Spinnable(delphine))\n\nnot Resistant(bradford)\n\nnot Resistant(bradford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The erinn is gnarled. The carlin backstitch the erinn. The aubry consonate the erinn. The bernadina backstitch the erinn. If someone backstitch the aubry then the aubry is not tart. If someone reprocess the aubry then they do not like the erinn. All gnarled people are systolic. If someone backstitch the erinn and the erinn backstitch the aubry then they see the bernadina. If someone consonate the erinn and the erinn is not mustached then they do not like the carlin. If someone is gnarled then they like the carlin. If the bernadina backstitch the erinn and the erinn is systolic then the erinn reprocess the aubry. If someone consonate the erinn then the erinn is tart. The bernadina consonate the erinn.", "logic": "\nGnarled(erinn)\nBackstitch(carlin, erinn)\nConsonate(aubry, erinn)\nBackstitch(bernadina, erinn)\nforall x (Backstitch(x, aubry) -> not Tart(aubry))\nforall x (Reprocess(x, aubry) -> not Consonate(x, erinn))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Backstitch(x, erinn) and Backstitch(erinn, aubry) -> Reprocess(x, bernadina))\nforall x (Consonate(x, erinn) and not Mustached(erinn) -> not Consonate(x, carlin))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) -> Consonate(x, carlin))\nBackstitch(bernadina, erinn) and Systolic(erinn) -> Reprocess(erinn, aubry)\nforall x (Consonate(x, erinn) -> Tart(erinn))\n\nConsonate(bernadina, erinn)\n\nConsonate(bernadina, erinn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1523"} {"premises": "The allene is not moorish. The allene is untoothed. The allene is not erasable. The allene scold the adriena. The allene unknot the adriena. The allene does not visit the adriena. The adriena is not moorish. The adriena is dismal. The adriena is not erasable. The adriena does not need the allene. The adriena unknot the allene. The adriena mitigate the allene. If the allene does not see the adriena and the adriena is not turbid then the allene scold the adriena. If someone scold the adriena and they are not dismal then they are moorish. If someone mitigate the allene then the allene does not visit the adriena. The allene unknot the adriena.", "logic": "\nnot Moorish(allene)\nUntoothed(allene)\nnot Erasable(allene)\nScold(allene, adriena)\nUnknot(allene, adriena)\nnot Mitigate(allene, adriena)\nnot Moorish(adriena)\nDismal(adriena)\nnot Erasable(adriena)\nnot Scold(adriena, allene)\nUnknot(adriena, allene)\nMitigate(adriena, allene)\nnot Unknot(allene, adriena) and not Turbid(adriena) -> Scold(allene, adriena)\nforall x (Scold(x, adriena) and not Dismal(x) -> Moorish(x))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, allene) -> not Mitigate(allene, adriena))\n\nUnknot(allene, adriena)\n\ntherefore Unknot(allene, adriena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3415"} {"premises": "The mag is not discarded. The mag is spoilable. The mag is not raunchy. The mag rave the darya. The mag accurse the darya. The mag does not visit the darya. The darya is not discarded. The darya is florid. The darya is not raunchy. The darya does not need the mag. The darya accurse the mag. The darya forego the mag. If the mag does not see the darya and the darya is not unstinted then the mag rave the darya. If someone rave the darya and they are not florid then they are discarded. If someone forego the mag then the mag does not visit the darya. The mag is not spoilable.", "logic": "\nnot Discarded(mag)\nSpoilable(mag)\nnot Raunchy(mag)\nRave(mag, darya)\nAccurse(mag, darya)\nnot Forego(mag, darya)\nnot Discarded(darya)\nFlorid(darya)\nnot Raunchy(darya)\nnot Rave(darya, mag)\nAccurse(darya, mag)\nForego(darya, mag)\nnot Accurse(mag, darya) and not Unstinted(darya) -> Rave(mag, darya)\nforall x (Rave(x, darya) and not Florid(x) -> Discarded(x))\nforall x (Forego(x, mag) -> not Forego(mag, darya))\n\nnot Spoilable(mag)\n\ntherefore Spoilable(mag)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3415"} {"premises": "The gil is not demulcent. The gil is strait. The gil is not unsaid. The gil wheedle the sheffie. The gil comply the sheffie. The gil does not visit the sheffie. The sheffie is not demulcent. The sheffie is jesuitical. The sheffie is not unsaid. The sheffie does not need the gil. The sheffie comply the gil. The sheffie deodorize the gil. If the gil does not see the sheffie and the sheffie is not junior then the gil wheedle the sheffie. If someone wheedle the sheffie and they are not jesuitical then they are demulcent. If someone deodorize the gil then the gil does not visit the sheffie. The sheffie does not need the sheffie.", "logic": "\nnot Demulcent(gil)\nStrait(gil)\nnot Unsaid(gil)\nWheedle(gil, sheffie)\nComply(gil, sheffie)\nnot Deodorize(gil, sheffie)\nnot Demulcent(sheffie)\nJesuitical(sheffie)\nnot Unsaid(sheffie)\nnot Wheedle(sheffie, gil)\nComply(sheffie, gil)\nDeodorize(sheffie, gil)\nnot Comply(gil, sheffie) and not Junior(sheffie) -> Wheedle(gil, sheffie)\nforall x (Wheedle(x, sheffie) and not Jesuitical(x) -> Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Deodorize(x, gil) -> not Deodorize(gil, sheffie))\n\nnot Wheedle(sheffie, sheffie)\n\nnot Wheedle(sheffie, sheffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3415"} {"premises": "The mela is not stainless. The mela is excursive. The mela is not laputan. The mela cabal the zola. The mela stick the zola. The mela does not visit the zola. The zola is not stainless. The zola is treeless. The zola is not laputan. The zola does not need the mela. The zola stick the mela. The zola overspend the mela. If the mela does not see the zola and the zola is not pushful then the mela cabal the zola. If someone cabal the zola and they are not treeless then they are stainless. If someone overspend the mela then the mela does not visit the zola. The mela is treeless.", "logic": "\nnot Stainless(mela)\nExcursive(mela)\nnot Laputan(mela)\nCabal(mela, zola)\nStick(mela, zola)\nnot Overspend(mela, zola)\nnot Stainless(zola)\nTreeless(zola)\nnot Laputan(zola)\nnot Cabal(zola, mela)\nStick(zola, mela)\nOverspend(zola, mela)\nnot Stick(mela, zola) and not Pushful(zola) -> Cabal(mela, zola)\nforall x (Cabal(x, zola) and not Treeless(x) -> Stainless(x))\nforall x (Overspend(x, mela) -> not Overspend(mela, zola))\n\nTreeless(mela)\n\nTreeless(mela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3415"} {"premises": "Tessi is rife. Tessi is splay. Tessi is unplaced. Tessi is coplanar. Tessi is inadequate. Tessi is laminal. Tessi is covered. Minda is unplaced. Minda is inadequate. Victoria is rife. Victoria is splay. Victoria is unplaced. Victoria is coplanar. Victoria is inadequate. Victoria is laminal. Victoria is covered. If someone is rife then they are inadequate. If Minda is laminal then Minda is splay. Green people are laminal. Cold people are laminal. Furry people are coplanar. Cold people are laminal. If Victoria is coplanar and Victoria is inadequate then Victoria is covered. All covered people are rife. Victoria is unplaced.", "logic": "\nRife(tessi)\nSplay(tessi)\nUnplaced(tessi)\nCoplanar(tessi)\nInadequate(tessi)\nLaminal(tessi)\nCovered(tessi)\nUnplaced(minda)\nInadequate(minda)\nRife(victoria)\nSplay(victoria)\nUnplaced(victoria)\nCoplanar(victoria)\nInadequate(victoria)\nLaminal(victoria)\nCovered(victoria)\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Inadequate(x))\nLaminal(minda) -> Splay(minda)\nforall x (Coplanar(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Coplanar(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) -> Laminal(x))\nCoplanar(victoria) and Inadequate(victoria) -> Covered(victoria)\nforall x (Covered(x) -> Rife(x))\n\nUnplaced(victoria)\n\ntherefore Unplaced(victoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Suzanna is skinless. Suzanna is averse. Suzanna is salvadoran. Suzanna is edgeless. Suzanna is snoopy. Suzanna is ataraxic. Suzanna is painless. Rhona is salvadoran. Rhona is snoopy. Ariadne is skinless. Ariadne is averse. Ariadne is salvadoran. Ariadne is edgeless. Ariadne is snoopy. Ariadne is ataraxic. Ariadne is painless. If someone is skinless then they are snoopy. If Rhona is ataraxic then Rhona is averse. Green people are ataraxic. Cold people are ataraxic. Furry people are edgeless. Cold people are ataraxic. If Ariadne is edgeless and Ariadne is snoopy then Ariadne is painless. All painless people are skinless. Rhona is not snoopy.", "logic": "\nSkinless(suzanna)\nAverse(suzanna)\nSalvadoran(suzanna)\nEdgeless(suzanna)\nSnoopy(suzanna)\nAtaraxic(suzanna)\nPainless(suzanna)\nSalvadoran(rhona)\nSnoopy(rhona)\nSkinless(ariadne)\nAverse(ariadne)\nSalvadoran(ariadne)\nEdgeless(ariadne)\nSnoopy(ariadne)\nAtaraxic(ariadne)\nPainless(ariadne)\nforall x (Skinless(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nAtaraxic(rhona) -> Averse(rhona)\nforall x (Edgeless(x) -> Ataraxic(x))\nforall x (Averse(x) -> Ataraxic(x))\nforall x (Salvadoran(x) -> Edgeless(x))\nforall x (Averse(x) -> Ataraxic(x))\nEdgeless(ariadne) and Snoopy(ariadne) -> Painless(ariadne)\nforall x (Painless(x) -> Skinless(x))\n\nnot Snoopy(rhona)\n\ntherefore Snoopy(rhona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Dori is chancy. Dori is stovepiped. Dori is rectified. Dori is untied. Dori is millennian. Dori is bullnecked. Dori is lemonlike. Noam is rectified. Noam is millennian. Vina is chancy. Vina is stovepiped. Vina is rectified. Vina is untied. Vina is millennian. Vina is bullnecked. Vina is lemonlike. If someone is chancy then they are millennian. If Noam is bullnecked then Noam is stovepiped. Green people are bullnecked. Cold people are bullnecked. Furry people are untied. Cold people are bullnecked. If Vina is untied and Vina is millennian then Vina is lemonlike. All lemonlike people are chancy. Noam is untied.", "logic": "\nChancy(dori)\nStovepiped(dori)\nRectified(dori)\nUntied(dori)\nMillennian(dori)\nBullnecked(dori)\nLemonlike(dori)\nRectified(noam)\nMillennian(noam)\nChancy(vina)\nStovepiped(vina)\nRectified(vina)\nUntied(vina)\nMillennian(vina)\nBullnecked(vina)\nLemonlike(vina)\nforall x (Chancy(x) -> Millennian(x))\nBullnecked(noam) -> Stovepiped(noam)\nforall x (Untied(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Rectified(x) -> Untied(x))\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nUntied(vina) and Millennian(vina) -> Lemonlike(vina)\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Chancy(x))\n\nUntied(noam)\n\nRectified(noam) and forall x (Rectified(x) -> Untied(x)) -> therefore Untied(noam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Roger is upmost. Roger is columnar. Roger is orbicular. Roger is unvalued. Roger is distal. Roger is leathery. Roger is foiled. Selestina is orbicular. Selestina is distal. Bernardo is upmost. Bernardo is columnar. Bernardo is orbicular. Bernardo is unvalued. Bernardo is distal. Bernardo is leathery. Bernardo is foiled. If someone is upmost then they are distal. If Selestina is leathery then Selestina is columnar. Green people are leathery. Cold people are leathery. Furry people are unvalued. Cold people are leathery. If Bernardo is unvalued and Bernardo is distal then Bernardo is foiled. All foiled people are upmost. Selestina is not unvalued.", "logic": "\nUpmost(roger)\nColumnar(roger)\nOrbicular(roger)\nUnvalued(roger)\nDistal(roger)\nLeathery(roger)\nFoiled(roger)\nOrbicular(selestina)\nDistal(selestina)\nUpmost(bernardo)\nColumnar(bernardo)\nOrbicular(bernardo)\nUnvalued(bernardo)\nDistal(bernardo)\nLeathery(bernardo)\nFoiled(bernardo)\nforall x (Upmost(x) -> Distal(x))\nLeathery(selestina) -> Columnar(selestina)\nforall x (Unvalued(x) -> Leathery(x))\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Leathery(x))\nforall x (Orbicular(x) -> Unvalued(x))\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Leathery(x))\nUnvalued(bernardo) and Distal(bernardo) -> Foiled(bernardo)\nforall x (Foiled(x) -> Upmost(x))\n\nnot Unvalued(selestina)\n\nOrbicular(selestina) and forall x (Orbicular(x) -> Unvalued(x)) -> therefore Unvalued(selestina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Haskel is expositive. Haskel is belittling. Haskel is relative. Haskel is immutable. Haskel is beady. Haskel is mailed. Haskel is canicular. Leela is relative. Leela is beady. Malissa is expositive. Malissa is belittling. Malissa is relative. Malissa is immutable. Malissa is beady. Malissa is mailed. Malissa is canicular. If someone is expositive then they are beady. If Leela is mailed then Leela is belittling. Green people are mailed. Cold people are mailed. Furry people are immutable. Cold people are mailed. If Malissa is immutable and Malissa is beady then Malissa is canicular. All canicular people are expositive. Leela is mailed.", "logic": "\nExpositive(haskel)\nBelittling(haskel)\nRelative(haskel)\nImmutable(haskel)\nBeady(haskel)\nMailed(haskel)\nCanicular(haskel)\nRelative(leela)\nBeady(leela)\nExpositive(malissa)\nBelittling(malissa)\nRelative(malissa)\nImmutable(malissa)\nBeady(malissa)\nMailed(malissa)\nCanicular(malissa)\nforall x (Expositive(x) -> Beady(x))\nMailed(leela) -> Belittling(leela)\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Mailed(x))\nforall x (Belittling(x) -> Mailed(x))\nforall x (Relative(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Belittling(x) -> Mailed(x))\nImmutable(malissa) and Beady(malissa) -> Canicular(malissa)\nforall x (Canicular(x) -> Expositive(x))\n\nMailed(leela)\n\nRelative(leela) and forall x (Relative(x) -> Immutable(x)) -> therefore Immutable(leela) Immutable(leela) and forall x (Immutable(x) -> Mailed(x)) -> therefore Mailed(leela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Allegra is uniovular. Allegra is typic. Allegra is fossilized. Allegra is leprous. Allegra is gimpy. Allegra is brag. Allegra is spouting. Christi is fossilized. Christi is gimpy. Derrol is uniovular. Derrol is typic. Derrol is fossilized. Derrol is leprous. Derrol is gimpy. Derrol is brag. Derrol is spouting. If someone is uniovular then they are gimpy. If Christi is brag then Christi is typic. Green people are brag. Cold people are brag. Furry people are leprous. Cold people are brag. If Derrol is leprous and Derrol is gimpy then Derrol is spouting. All spouting people are uniovular. Christi is not brag.", "logic": "\nUniovular(allegra)\nTypic(allegra)\nFossilized(allegra)\nLeprous(allegra)\nGimpy(allegra)\nBrag(allegra)\nSpouting(allegra)\nFossilized(christi)\nGimpy(christi)\nUniovular(derrol)\nTypic(derrol)\nFossilized(derrol)\nLeprous(derrol)\nGimpy(derrol)\nBrag(derrol)\nSpouting(derrol)\nforall x (Uniovular(x) -> Gimpy(x))\nBrag(christi) -> Typic(christi)\nforall x (Leprous(x) -> Brag(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) -> Brag(x))\nforall x (Fossilized(x) -> Leprous(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) -> Brag(x))\nLeprous(derrol) and Gimpy(derrol) -> Spouting(derrol)\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Uniovular(x))\n\nnot Brag(christi)\n\nFossilized(christi) and forall x (Fossilized(x) -> Leprous(x)) -> therefore Leprous(christi) Leprous(christi) and forall x (Leprous(x) -> Brag(x)) -> therefore Brag(christi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Sheri is shortened. Sheri is autoecious. Sheri is greyed. Sheri is regulation. Sheri is unguarded. Sheri is tameable. Sheri is roseate. Yvonne is greyed. Yvonne is unguarded. Lenore is shortened. Lenore is autoecious. Lenore is greyed. Lenore is regulation. Lenore is unguarded. Lenore is tameable. Lenore is roseate. If someone is shortened then they are unguarded. If Yvonne is tameable then Yvonne is autoecious. Green people are tameable. Cold people are tameable. Furry people are regulation. Cold people are tameable. If Lenore is regulation and Lenore is unguarded then Lenore is roseate. All roseate people are shortened. Yvonne is autoecious.", "logic": "\nShortened(sheri)\nAutoecious(sheri)\nGreyed(sheri)\nRegulation(sheri)\nUnguarded(sheri)\nTameable(sheri)\nRoseate(sheri)\nGreyed(yvonne)\nUnguarded(yvonne)\nShortened(lenore)\nAutoecious(lenore)\nGreyed(lenore)\nRegulation(lenore)\nUnguarded(lenore)\nTameable(lenore)\nRoseate(lenore)\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nTameable(yvonne) -> Autoecious(yvonne)\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Autoecious(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Greyed(x) -> Regulation(x))\nforall x (Autoecious(x) -> Tameable(x))\nRegulation(lenore) and Unguarded(lenore) -> Roseate(lenore)\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> Shortened(x))\n\nAutoecious(yvonne)\n\nGreyed(yvonne) and forall x (Greyed(x) -> Regulation(x)) -> therefore Regulation(yvonne) Regulation(yvonne) and forall x (Regulation(x) -> Tameable(x)) -> therefore Tameable(yvonne) Tameable(yvonne) and Tameable(yvonne) -> Autoecious(yvonne) -> therefore Autoecious(yvonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Florrie is slain. Florrie is smelling. Florrie is aplanatic. Florrie is carsick. Florrie is bungling. Florrie is festive. Florrie is naive. Lorenzo is aplanatic. Lorenzo is bungling. Clive is slain. Clive is smelling. Clive is aplanatic. Clive is carsick. Clive is bungling. Clive is festive. Clive is naive. If someone is slain then they are bungling. If Lorenzo is festive then Lorenzo is smelling. Green people are festive. Cold people are festive. Furry people are carsick. Cold people are festive. If Clive is carsick and Clive is bungling then Clive is naive. All naive people are slain. Lorenzo is not smelling.", "logic": "\nSlain(florrie)\nSmelling(florrie)\nAplanatic(florrie)\nCarsick(florrie)\nBungling(florrie)\nFestive(florrie)\nNaive(florrie)\nAplanatic(lorenzo)\nBungling(lorenzo)\nSlain(clive)\nSmelling(clive)\nAplanatic(clive)\nCarsick(clive)\nBungling(clive)\nFestive(clive)\nNaive(clive)\nforall x (Slain(x) -> Bungling(x))\nFestive(lorenzo) -> Smelling(lorenzo)\nforall x (Carsick(x) -> Festive(x))\nforall x (Smelling(x) -> Festive(x))\nforall x (Aplanatic(x) -> Carsick(x))\nforall x (Smelling(x) -> Festive(x))\nCarsick(clive) and Bungling(clive) -> Naive(clive)\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Slain(x))\n\nnot Smelling(lorenzo)\n\nAplanatic(lorenzo) and forall x (Aplanatic(x) -> Carsick(x)) -> therefore Carsick(lorenzo) Carsick(lorenzo) and forall x (Carsick(x) -> Festive(x)) -> therefore Festive(lorenzo) Festive(lorenzo) and Festive(lorenzo) -> Smelling(lorenzo) -> therefore Smelling(lorenzo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Sauncho is umptieth. Sauncho is baptised. Sauncho is pretend. Sauncho is tuneless. Sauncho is nonrigid. Sauncho is nibbed. Sauncho is adverse. Jade is pretend. Jade is nonrigid. Sayer is umptieth. Sayer is baptised. Sayer is pretend. Sayer is tuneless. Sayer is nonrigid. Sayer is nibbed. Sayer is adverse. If someone is umptieth then they are nonrigid. If Jade is nibbed then Jade is baptised. Green people are nibbed. Cold people are nibbed. Furry people are tuneless. Cold people are nibbed. If Sayer is tuneless and Sayer is nonrigid then Sayer is adverse. All adverse people are umptieth. Jade is not umptieth.", "logic": "\nUmptieth(sauncho)\nBaptised(sauncho)\nPretend(sauncho)\nTuneless(sauncho)\nNonrigid(sauncho)\nNibbed(sauncho)\nAdverse(sauncho)\nPretend(jade)\nNonrigid(jade)\nUmptieth(sayer)\nBaptised(sayer)\nPretend(sayer)\nTuneless(sayer)\nNonrigid(sayer)\nNibbed(sayer)\nAdverse(sayer)\nforall x (Umptieth(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\nNibbed(jade) -> Baptised(jade)\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Nibbed(x))\nforall x (Baptised(x) -> Nibbed(x))\nforall x (Pretend(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nforall x (Baptised(x) -> Nibbed(x))\nTuneless(sayer) and Nonrigid(sayer) -> Adverse(sayer)\nforall x (Adverse(x) -> Umptieth(x))\n\nnot Umptieth(jade)\n\nforall x (Adverse(x) -> Umptieth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "Berry is slaked. Berry is stearic. Berry is hollow. Berry is prime. Berry is apneic. Berry is moving. Berry is sickly. Julius is hollow. Julius is apneic. Armando is slaked. Armando is stearic. Armando is hollow. Armando is prime. Armando is apneic. Armando is moving. Armando is sickly. If someone is slaked then they are apneic. If Julius is moving then Julius is stearic. Green people are moving. Cold people are moving. Furry people are prime. Cold people are moving. If Armando is prime and Armando is apneic then Armando is sickly. All sickly people are slaked. Julius is sickly.", "logic": "\nSlaked(berry)\nStearic(berry)\nHollow(berry)\nPrime(berry)\nApneic(berry)\nMoving(berry)\nSickly(berry)\nHollow(julius)\nApneic(julius)\nSlaked(armando)\nStearic(armando)\nHollow(armando)\nPrime(armando)\nApneic(armando)\nMoving(armando)\nSickly(armando)\nforall x (Slaked(x) -> Apneic(x))\nMoving(julius) -> Stearic(julius)\nforall x (Prime(x) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Hollow(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Stearic(x) -> Moving(x))\nPrime(armando) and Apneic(armando) -> Sickly(armando)\nforall x (Sickly(x) -> Slaked(x))\n\nSickly(julius)\n\nSickly(julius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-309"} {"premises": "The vaclav captain the ranique. The ranique beseech the vaclav. The ranique decompose the vaclav. If someone captain the vaclav then they do not like the vaclav. If someone is uncertain then they like the vaclav. If someone captain the ranique and they like the ranique then they do not need the ranique. If someone captain the ranique then they are uncertain. If someone decompose the vaclav and they are not jacobinic then they are homing. If someone decompose the vaclav then the vaclav captain the ranique. If someone is uncertain then they like the ranique. If someone is uncertain and animated then they see the ranique. The ranique beseech the vaclav.", "logic": "\nCaptain(vaclav, ranique)\nBeseech(ranique, vaclav)\nDecompose(ranique, vaclav)\nforall x (Captain(x, vaclav) -> not Beseech(x, vaclav))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Beseech(x, vaclav))\nforall x (Captain(x, ranique) and Beseech(x, ranique) -> not Decompose(x, ranique))\nforall x (Captain(x, ranique) -> Uncertain(x))\nforall x (Decompose(x, vaclav) and not Jacobinic(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Decompose(x, vaclav) -> Captain(vaclav, ranique))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Beseech(x, ranique))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and Animated(x) -> Captain(x, ranique))\n\nBeseech(ranique, vaclav)\n\ntherefore Beseech(ranique, vaclav)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The natalee epitomize the abdel. The abdel summarize the natalee. The abdel suffocate the natalee. If someone epitomize the natalee then they do not like the natalee. If someone is outfitted then they like the natalee. If someone epitomize the abdel and they like the abdel then they do not need the abdel. If someone epitomize the abdel then they are outfitted. If someone suffocate the natalee and they are not modal then they are fibrinous. If someone suffocate the natalee then the natalee epitomize the abdel. If someone is outfitted then they like the abdel. If someone is outfitted and gluttonous then they see the abdel. The abdel does not need the natalee.", "logic": "\nEpitomize(natalee, abdel)\nSummarize(abdel, natalee)\nSuffocate(abdel, natalee)\nforall x (Epitomize(x, natalee) -> not Summarize(x, natalee))\nforall x (Outfitted(x) -> Summarize(x, natalee))\nforall x (Epitomize(x, abdel) and Summarize(x, abdel) -> not Suffocate(x, abdel))\nforall x (Epitomize(x, abdel) -> Outfitted(x))\nforall x (Suffocate(x, natalee) and not Modal(x) -> Fibrinous(x))\nforall x (Suffocate(x, natalee) -> Epitomize(natalee, abdel))\nforall x (Outfitted(x) -> Summarize(x, abdel))\nforall x (Outfitted(x) and Gluttonous(x) -> Epitomize(x, abdel))\n\nnot Suffocate(abdel, natalee)\n\ntherefore Suffocate(abdel, natalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The ann budget the shalom. The shalom capitalise the ann. The shalom pretermit the ann. If someone budget the ann then they do not like the ann. If someone is implicated then they like the ann. If someone budget the shalom and they like the shalom then they do not need the shalom. If someone budget the shalom then they are implicated. If someone pretermit the ann and they are not shirty then they are irritating. If someone pretermit the ann then the ann budget the shalom. If someone is implicated then they like the shalom. If someone is implicated and cackly then they see the shalom. The ann is implicated.", "logic": "\nBudget(ann, shalom)\nCapitalise(shalom, ann)\nPretermit(shalom, ann)\nforall x (Budget(x, ann) -> not Capitalise(x, ann))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Capitalise(x, ann))\nforall x (Budget(x, shalom) and Capitalise(x, shalom) -> not Pretermit(x, shalom))\nforall x (Budget(x, shalom) -> Implicated(x))\nforall x (Pretermit(x, ann) and not Shirty(x) -> Irritating(x))\nforall x (Pretermit(x, ann) -> Budget(ann, shalom))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Capitalise(x, shalom))\nforall x (Implicated(x) and Cackly(x) -> Budget(x, shalom))\n\nImplicated(ann)\n\nBudget(ann, shalom) and forall x (Budget(x, shalom) -> Implicated(x)) -> therefore Implicated(ann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The hector subtract the eugenia. The eugenia approach the hector. The eugenia drift the hector. If someone subtract the hector then they do not like the hector. If someone is lumpish then they like the hector. If someone subtract the eugenia and they like the eugenia then they do not need the eugenia. If someone subtract the eugenia then they are lumpish. If someone drift the hector and they are not theban then they are elvish. If someone drift the hector then the hector subtract the eugenia. If someone is lumpish then they like the eugenia. If someone is lumpish and mighty then they see the eugenia. The hector is not lumpish.", "logic": "\nSubtract(hector, eugenia)\nApproach(eugenia, hector)\nDrift(eugenia, hector)\nforall x (Subtract(x, hector) -> not Approach(x, hector))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Approach(x, hector))\nforall x (Subtract(x, eugenia) and Approach(x, eugenia) -> not Drift(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Subtract(x, eugenia) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Drift(x, hector) and not Theban(x) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Drift(x, hector) -> Subtract(hector, eugenia))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Approach(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) and Mighty(x) -> Subtract(x, eugenia))\n\nnot Lumpish(hector)\n\nSubtract(hector, eugenia) and forall x (Subtract(x, eugenia) -> Lumpish(x)) -> therefore Lumpish(hector)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The wojciech tonsure the fania. The fania amend the wojciech. The fania include the wojciech. If someone tonsure the wojciech then they do not like the wojciech. If someone is bipartisan then they like the wojciech. If someone tonsure the fania and they like the fania then they do not need the fania. If someone tonsure the fania then they are bipartisan. If someone include the wojciech and they are not felted then they are columnlike. If someone include the wojciech then the wojciech tonsure the fania. If someone is bipartisan then they like the fania. If someone is bipartisan and ribbed then they see the fania. The wojciech amend the wojciech.", "logic": "\nTonsure(wojciech, fania)\nAmend(fania, wojciech)\nInclude(fania, wojciech)\nforall x (Tonsure(x, wojciech) -> not Amend(x, wojciech))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Amend(x, wojciech))\nforall x (Tonsure(x, fania) and Amend(x, fania) -> not Include(x, fania))\nforall x (Tonsure(x, fania) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Include(x, wojciech) and not Felted(x) -> Columnlike(x))\nforall x (Include(x, wojciech) -> Tonsure(wojciech, fania))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Amend(x, fania))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Ribbed(x) -> Tonsure(x, fania))\n\nAmend(wojciech, wojciech)\n\nTonsure(wojciech, fania) and forall x (Tonsure(x, fania) -> Bipartisan(x)) -> therefore Bipartisan(wojciech) Bipartisan(wojciech) and forall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Amend(x, wojciech)) -> therefore Amend(wojciech, wojciech)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The dido displace the bartolemo. The bartolemo copyread the dido. The bartolemo harbor the dido. If someone displace the dido then they do not like the dido. If someone is spare then they like the dido. If someone displace the bartolemo and they like the bartolemo then they do not need the bartolemo. If someone displace the bartolemo then they are spare. If someone harbor the dido and they are not beneficed then they are littler. If someone harbor the dido then the dido displace the bartolemo. If someone is spare then they like the bartolemo. If someone is spare and glaciated then they see the bartolemo. The dido does not like the bartolemo.", "logic": "\nDisplace(dido, bartolemo)\nCopyread(bartolemo, dido)\nHarbor(bartolemo, dido)\nforall x (Displace(x, dido) -> not Copyread(x, dido))\nforall x (Spare(x) -> Copyread(x, dido))\nforall x (Displace(x, bartolemo) and Copyread(x, bartolemo) -> not Harbor(x, bartolemo))\nforall x (Displace(x, bartolemo) -> Spare(x))\nforall x (Harbor(x, dido) and not Beneficed(x) -> Littler(x))\nforall x (Harbor(x, dido) -> Displace(dido, bartolemo))\nforall x (Spare(x) -> Copyread(x, bartolemo))\nforall x (Spare(x) and Glaciated(x) -> Displace(x, bartolemo))\n\nnot Copyread(dido, bartolemo)\n\nDisplace(dido, bartolemo) and forall x (Displace(x, bartolemo) -> Spare(x)) -> therefore Spare(dido) Spare(dido) and forall x (Spare(x) -> Copyread(x, bartolemo)) -> therefore Copyread(dido, bartolemo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The ingmar novelise the hans. The hans ride the ingmar. The hans honk the ingmar. If someone novelise the ingmar then they do not like the ingmar. If someone is freeborn then they like the ingmar. If someone novelise the hans and they like the hans then they do not need the hans. If someone novelise the hans then they are freeborn. If someone honk the ingmar and they are not threatened then they are soughing. If someone honk the ingmar then the ingmar novelise the hans. If someone is freeborn then they like the hans. If someone is freeborn and anasarcous then they see the hans. The ingmar does not need the hans.", "logic": "\nNovelise(ingmar, hans)\nRide(hans, ingmar)\nHonk(hans, ingmar)\nforall x (Novelise(x, ingmar) -> not Ride(x, ingmar))\nforall x (Freeborn(x) -> Ride(x, ingmar))\nforall x (Novelise(x, hans) and Ride(x, hans) -> not Honk(x, hans))\nforall x (Novelise(x, hans) -> Freeborn(x))\nforall x (Honk(x, ingmar) and not Threatened(x) -> Soughing(x))\nforall x (Honk(x, ingmar) -> Novelise(ingmar, hans))\nforall x (Freeborn(x) -> Ride(x, hans))\nforall x (Freeborn(x) and Anasarcous(x) -> Novelise(x, hans))\n\nnot Honk(ingmar, hans)\n\nNovelise(ingmar, hans) and forall x (Novelise(x, hans) -> Freeborn(x)) -> therefore Freeborn(ingmar) Freeborn(ingmar) and forall x (Freeborn(x) -> Ride(x, hans)) -> therefore Ride(ingmar, hans) Novelise(ingmar, hans) and Ride(ingmar, hans) and forall x (Novelise(x, hans) and Ride(x, hans) -> not Honk(x, hans)) -> therefore not Honk(ingmar, hans)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The eberhard culture the madella. The madella reshoot the eberhard. The madella corn the eberhard. If someone culture the eberhard then they do not like the eberhard. If someone is colloquial then they like the eberhard. If someone culture the madella and they like the madella then they do not need the madella. If someone culture the madella then they are colloquial. If someone corn the eberhard and they are not languid then they are denotative. If someone corn the eberhard then the eberhard culture the madella. If someone is colloquial then they like the madella. If someone is colloquial and deft then they see the madella. The eberhard corn the madella.", "logic": "\nCulture(eberhard, madella)\nReshoot(madella, eberhard)\nCorn(madella, eberhard)\nforall x (Culture(x, eberhard) -> not Reshoot(x, eberhard))\nforall x (Colloquial(x) -> Reshoot(x, eberhard))\nforall x (Culture(x, madella) and Reshoot(x, madella) -> not Corn(x, madella))\nforall x (Culture(x, madella) -> Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Corn(x, eberhard) and not Languid(x) -> Denotative(x))\nforall x (Corn(x, eberhard) -> Culture(eberhard, madella))\nforall x (Colloquial(x) -> Reshoot(x, madella))\nforall x (Colloquial(x) and Deft(x) -> Culture(x, madella))\n\nCorn(eberhard, madella)\n\nCulture(eberhard, madella) and forall x (Culture(x, madella) -> Colloquial(x)) -> therefore Colloquial(eberhard) Colloquial(eberhard) and forall x (Colloquial(x) -> Reshoot(x, madella)) -> therefore Reshoot(eberhard, madella) Culture(eberhard, madella) and Reshoot(eberhard, madella) and forall x (Culture(x, madella) and Reshoot(x, madella) -> not Corn(x, madella)) -> therefore not Corn(eberhard, madella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The rasia network the claus. The claus misbelieve the rasia. The claus butter the rasia. If someone network the rasia then they do not like the rasia. If someone is foliolate then they like the rasia. If someone network the claus and they like the claus then they do not need the claus. If someone network the claus then they are foliolate. If someone butter the rasia and they are not unbaffled then they are centric. If someone butter the rasia then the rasia network the claus. If someone is foliolate then they like the claus. If someone is foliolate and vermiform then they see the claus. The claus is not foliolate.", "logic": "\nNetwork(rasia, claus)\nMisbelieve(claus, rasia)\nButter(claus, rasia)\nforall x (Network(x, rasia) -> not Misbelieve(x, rasia))\nforall x (Foliolate(x) -> Misbelieve(x, rasia))\nforall x (Network(x, claus) and Misbelieve(x, claus) -> not Butter(x, claus))\nforall x (Network(x, claus) -> Foliolate(x))\nforall x (Butter(x, rasia) and not Unbaffled(x) -> Centric(x))\nforall x (Butter(x, rasia) -> Network(rasia, claus))\nforall x (Foliolate(x) -> Misbelieve(x, claus))\nforall x (Foliolate(x) and Vermiform(x) -> Network(x, claus))\n\nnot Foliolate(claus)\n\nforall x (Network(x, claus) -> Foliolate(x)) <- forall x (Foliolate(x) and Vermiform(x) -> Network(x, claus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The hunter neighbour the ardenia. The ardenia boggle the hunter. The ardenia delineate the hunter. If someone neighbour the hunter then they do not like the hunter. If someone is blase then they like the hunter. If someone neighbour the ardenia and they like the ardenia then they do not need the ardenia. If someone neighbour the ardenia then they are blase. If someone delineate the hunter and they are not adjusted then they are ocellated. If someone delineate the hunter then the hunter neighbour the ardenia. If someone is blase then they like the ardenia. If someone is blase and oversize then they see the ardenia. The ardenia boggle the ardenia.", "logic": "\nNeighbour(hunter, ardenia)\nBoggle(ardenia, hunter)\nDelineate(ardenia, hunter)\nforall x (Neighbour(x, hunter) -> not Boggle(x, hunter))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Boggle(x, hunter))\nforall x (Neighbour(x, ardenia) and Boggle(x, ardenia) -> not Delineate(x, ardenia))\nforall x (Neighbour(x, ardenia) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Delineate(x, hunter) and not Adjusted(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Delineate(x, hunter) -> Neighbour(hunter, ardenia))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Boggle(x, ardenia))\nforall x (Blase(x) and Oversize(x) -> Neighbour(x, ardenia))\n\nBoggle(ardenia, ardenia)\n\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Boggle(x, ardenia)) <- forall x (Neighbour(x, ardenia) -> Blase(x)) <- forall x (Blase(x) and Oversize(x) -> Neighbour(x, ardenia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The dot derail the aubine. The aubine dulcorate the dot. The aubine schematize the dot. If someone derail the dot then they do not like the dot. If someone is cinnabar then they like the dot. If someone derail the aubine and they like the aubine then they do not need the aubine. If someone derail the aubine then they are cinnabar. If someone schematize the dot and they are not leakproof then they are citrous. If someone schematize the dot then the dot derail the aubine. If someone is cinnabar then they like the aubine. If someone is cinnabar and laughable then they see the aubine. The dot is not citrous.", "logic": "\nDerail(dot, aubine)\nDulcorate(aubine, dot)\nSchematize(aubine, dot)\nforall x (Derail(x, dot) -> not Dulcorate(x, dot))\nforall x (Cinnabar(x) -> Dulcorate(x, dot))\nforall x (Derail(x, aubine) and Dulcorate(x, aubine) -> not Schematize(x, aubine))\nforall x (Derail(x, aubine) -> Cinnabar(x))\nforall x (Schematize(x, dot) and not Leakproof(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Schematize(x, dot) -> Derail(dot, aubine))\nforall x (Cinnabar(x) -> Dulcorate(x, aubine))\nforall x (Cinnabar(x) and Laughable(x) -> Derail(x, aubine))\n\nnot Citrous(dot)\n\nforall x (Schematize(x, dot) and not Leakproof(x) -> Citrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The charmaine serialize the micki. The micki arouse the charmaine. The micki hide the charmaine. If someone serialize the charmaine then they do not like the charmaine. If someone is slashing then they like the charmaine. If someone serialize the micki and they like the micki then they do not need the micki. If someone serialize the micki then they are slashing. If someone hide the charmaine and they are not clouded then they are condemning. If someone hide the charmaine then the charmaine serialize the micki. If someone is slashing then they like the micki. If someone is slashing and likely then they see the micki. The micki is condemning.", "logic": "\nSerialize(charmaine, micki)\nArouse(micki, charmaine)\nHide(micki, charmaine)\nforall x (Serialize(x, charmaine) -> not Arouse(x, charmaine))\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Arouse(x, charmaine))\nforall x (Serialize(x, micki) and Arouse(x, micki) -> not Hide(x, micki))\nforall x (Serialize(x, micki) -> Slashing(x))\nforall x (Hide(x, charmaine) and not Clouded(x) -> Condemning(x))\nforall x (Hide(x, charmaine) -> Serialize(charmaine, micki))\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Arouse(x, micki))\nforall x (Slashing(x) and Likely(x) -> Serialize(x, micki))\n\nCondemning(micki)\n\nforall x (Hide(x, charmaine) and not Clouded(x) -> Condemning(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The terrence disclaim the isidore. The isidore coquette the terrence. The isidore buss the terrence. If someone disclaim the terrence then they do not like the terrence. If someone is binocular then they like the terrence. If someone disclaim the isidore and they like the isidore then they do not need the isidore. If someone disclaim the isidore then they are binocular. If someone buss the terrence and they are not delusory then they are extrovert. If someone buss the terrence then the terrence disclaim the isidore. If someone is binocular then they like the isidore. If someone is binocular and cislunar then they see the isidore. The isidore is not kind.", "logic": "\nDisclaim(terrence, isidore)\nCoquette(isidore, terrence)\nBuss(isidore, terrence)\nforall x (Disclaim(x, terrence) -> not Coquette(x, terrence))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Coquette(x, terrence))\nforall x (Disclaim(x, isidore) and Coquette(x, isidore) -> not Buss(x, isidore))\nforall x (Disclaim(x, isidore) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Buss(x, terrence) and not Delusory(x) -> Extrovert(x))\nforall x (Buss(x, terrence) -> Disclaim(terrence, isidore))\nforall x (Binocular(x) -> Coquette(x, isidore))\nforall x (Binocular(x) and Cislunar(x) -> Disclaim(x, isidore))\n\nnot Kind(isidore)\n\nnot Kind(isidore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The alex spotweld the zarla. The zarla inhere the alex. The zarla impact the alex. If someone spotweld the alex then they do not like the alex. If someone is backhand then they like the alex. If someone spotweld the zarla and they like the zarla then they do not need the zarla. If someone spotweld the zarla then they are backhand. If someone impact the alex and they are not saxicolous then they are wideband. If someone impact the alex then the alex spotweld the zarla. If someone is backhand then they like the zarla. If someone is backhand and emblematic then they see the zarla. The alex impact the alex.", "logic": "\nSpotweld(alex, zarla)\nInhere(zarla, alex)\nImpact(zarla, alex)\nforall x (Spotweld(x, alex) -> not Inhere(x, alex))\nforall x (Backhand(x) -> Inhere(x, alex))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, zarla) and Inhere(x, zarla) -> not Impact(x, zarla))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, zarla) -> Backhand(x))\nforall x (Impact(x, alex) and not Saxicolous(x) -> Wideband(x))\nforall x (Impact(x, alex) -> Spotweld(alex, zarla))\nforall x (Backhand(x) -> Inhere(x, zarla))\nforall x (Backhand(x) and Emblematic(x) -> Spotweld(x, zarla))\n\nImpact(alex, alex)\n\nImpact(alex, alex) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The alfonzo slang the willette. The willette praise the alfonzo. The willette chill the alfonzo. If someone slang the alfonzo then they do not like the alfonzo. If someone is unendowed then they like the alfonzo. If someone slang the willette and they like the willette then they do not need the willette. If someone slang the willette then they are unendowed. If someone chill the alfonzo and they are not astral then they are perplexed. If someone chill the alfonzo then the alfonzo slang the willette. If someone is unendowed then they like the willette. If someone is unendowed and florentine then they see the willette. The willette does not need the willette.", "logic": "\nSlang(alfonzo, willette)\nPraise(willette, alfonzo)\nChill(willette, alfonzo)\nforall x (Slang(x, alfonzo) -> not Praise(x, alfonzo))\nforall x (Unendowed(x) -> Praise(x, alfonzo))\nforall x (Slang(x, willette) and Praise(x, willette) -> not Chill(x, willette))\nforall x (Slang(x, willette) -> Unendowed(x))\nforall x (Chill(x, alfonzo) and not Astral(x) -> Perplexed(x))\nforall x (Chill(x, alfonzo) -> Slang(alfonzo, willette))\nforall x (Unendowed(x) -> Praise(x, willette))\nforall x (Unendowed(x) and Florentine(x) -> Slang(x, willette))\n\nnot Chill(willette, willette)\n\nnot Chill(willette, willette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "The silvan revivify the samuele. The samuele whicker the silvan. The samuele privatise the silvan. If someone revivify the silvan then they do not like the silvan. If someone is listless then they like the silvan. If someone revivify the samuele and they like the samuele then they do not need the samuele. If someone revivify the samuele then they are listless. If someone privatise the silvan and they are not vitiated then they are scraggy. If someone privatise the silvan then the silvan revivify the samuele. If someone is listless then they like the samuele. If someone is listless and endogamic then they see the samuele. The silvan is kind.", "logic": "\nRevivify(silvan, samuele)\nWhicker(samuele, silvan)\nPrivatise(samuele, silvan)\nforall x (Revivify(x, silvan) -> not Whicker(x, silvan))\nforall x (Listless(x) -> Whicker(x, silvan))\nforall x (Revivify(x, samuele) and Whicker(x, samuele) -> not Privatise(x, samuele))\nforall x (Revivify(x, samuele) -> Listless(x))\nforall x (Privatise(x, silvan) and not Vitiated(x) -> Scraggy(x))\nforall x (Privatise(x, silvan) -> Revivify(silvan, samuele))\nforall x (Listless(x) -> Whicker(x, samuele))\nforall x (Listless(x) and Endogamic(x) -> Revivify(x, samuele))\n\nKind(silvan)\n\nKind(silvan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1388"} {"premises": "Igor is provident. Igor is cropped. Elbertine is embryotic. Elbertine is specific. Elbertine is little. Elbertine is grownup. Elbertine is provident. Elbertine is not goethian. Ronni is goethian. Nelsen is embryotic. Nelsen is specific. Nelsen is little. Nelsen is not grownup. Nelsen is provident. Nelsen is cropped. If Ronni is not cropped then Ronni is not provident. If Elbertine is provident and Elbertine is specific then Elbertine is not goethian. Quiet, little people are embryotic. All cropped people are embryotic. Smart people are embryotic. All specific, provident people are not goethian. If someone is goethian and not provident then they are specific. If someone is embryotic then they are specific. Nelsen is embryotic.", "logic": "\nProvident(igor)\nCropped(igor)\nEmbryotic(elbertine)\nSpecific(elbertine)\nLittle(elbertine)\nGrownup(elbertine)\nProvident(elbertine)\nnot Goethian(elbertine)\nGoethian(ronni)\nEmbryotic(nelsen)\nSpecific(nelsen)\nLittle(nelsen)\nnot Grownup(nelsen)\nProvident(nelsen)\nCropped(nelsen)\nnot Cropped(ronni) -> not Provident(ronni)\nProvident(elbertine) and Specific(elbertine) -> not Goethian(elbertine)\nforall x (Provident(x) and Little(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Cropped(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Specific(x) and Provident(x) -> not Goethian(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) and not Provident(x) -> Specific(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Specific(x))\n\nEmbryotic(nelsen)\n\ntherefore Embryotic(nelsen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Mona is bouldery. Mona is sprouted. Charlton is mutable. Charlton is corrupting. Charlton is wandering. Charlton is lissome. Charlton is bouldery. Charlton is not unfamiliar. Daren is unfamiliar. Nell is mutable. Nell is corrupting. Nell is wandering. Nell is not lissome. Nell is bouldery. Nell is sprouted. If Daren is not sprouted then Daren is not bouldery. If Charlton is bouldery and Charlton is corrupting then Charlton is not unfamiliar. Quiet, wandering people are mutable. All sprouted people are mutable. Smart people are mutable. All corrupting, bouldery people are not unfamiliar. If someone is unfamiliar and not bouldery then they are corrupting. If someone is mutable then they are corrupting. Charlton is not bouldery.", "logic": "\nBouldery(mona)\nSprouted(mona)\nMutable(charlton)\nCorrupting(charlton)\nWandering(charlton)\nLissome(charlton)\nBouldery(charlton)\nnot Unfamiliar(charlton)\nUnfamiliar(daren)\nMutable(nell)\nCorrupting(nell)\nWandering(nell)\nnot Lissome(nell)\nBouldery(nell)\nSprouted(nell)\nnot Sprouted(daren) -> not Bouldery(daren)\nBouldery(charlton) and Corrupting(charlton) -> not Unfamiliar(charlton)\nforall x (Bouldery(x) and Wandering(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Unfamiliar(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Corrupting(x) and Bouldery(x) -> not Unfamiliar(x))\nforall x (Unfamiliar(x) and not Bouldery(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nforall x (Mutable(x) -> Corrupting(x))\n\nnot Bouldery(charlton)\n\ntherefore Bouldery(charlton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Wells is credulous. Wells is quenched. Fabio is allometric. Fabio is ironic. Fabio is phocine. Fabio is degraded. Fabio is credulous. Fabio is not sumerian. Kee is sumerian. Elden is allometric. Elden is ironic. Elden is phocine. Elden is not degraded. Elden is credulous. Elden is quenched. If Kee is not quenched then Kee is not credulous. If Fabio is credulous and Fabio is ironic then Fabio is not sumerian. Quiet, phocine people are allometric. All quenched people are allometric. Smart people are allometric. All ironic, credulous people are not sumerian. If someone is sumerian and not credulous then they are ironic. If someone is allometric then they are ironic. Elden is not sumerian.", "logic": "\nCredulous(wells)\nQuenched(wells)\nAllometric(fabio)\nIronic(fabio)\nPhocine(fabio)\nDegraded(fabio)\nCredulous(fabio)\nnot Sumerian(fabio)\nSumerian(kee)\nAllometric(elden)\nIronic(elden)\nPhocine(elden)\nnot Degraded(elden)\nCredulous(elden)\nQuenched(elden)\nnot Quenched(kee) -> not Credulous(kee)\nCredulous(fabio) and Ironic(fabio) -> not Sumerian(fabio)\nforall x (Credulous(x) and Phocine(x) -> Allometric(x))\nforall x (Quenched(x) -> Allometric(x))\nforall x (Sumerian(x) -> Allometric(x))\nforall x (Ironic(x) and Credulous(x) -> not Sumerian(x))\nforall x (Sumerian(x) and not Credulous(x) -> Ironic(x))\nforall x (Allometric(x) -> Ironic(x))\n\nnot Sumerian(elden)\n\nIronic(elden) and Credulous(elden) and forall x (Ironic(x) and Credulous(x) -> not Sumerian(x)) -> therefore not Sumerian(elden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Emlyn is syncopated. Emlyn is nary. Valeria is tapped. Valeria is disfigured. Valeria is gallant. Valeria is abysmal. Valeria is syncopated. Valeria is not randomised. Hillary is randomised. Nerta is tapped. Nerta is disfigured. Nerta is gallant. Nerta is not abysmal. Nerta is syncopated. Nerta is nary. If Hillary is not nary then Hillary is not syncopated. If Valeria is syncopated and Valeria is disfigured then Valeria is not randomised. Quiet, gallant people are tapped. All nary people are tapped. Smart people are tapped. All disfigured, syncopated people are not randomised. If someone is randomised and not syncopated then they are disfigured. If someone is tapped then they are disfigured. Nerta is randomised.", "logic": "\nSyncopated(emlyn)\nNary(emlyn)\nTapped(valeria)\nDisfigured(valeria)\nGallant(valeria)\nAbysmal(valeria)\nSyncopated(valeria)\nnot Randomised(valeria)\nRandomised(hillary)\nTapped(nerta)\nDisfigured(nerta)\nGallant(nerta)\nnot Abysmal(nerta)\nSyncopated(nerta)\nNary(nerta)\nnot Nary(hillary) -> not Syncopated(hillary)\nSyncopated(valeria) and Disfigured(valeria) -> not Randomised(valeria)\nforall x (Syncopated(x) and Gallant(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Nary(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) and Syncopated(x) -> not Randomised(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) and not Syncopated(x) -> Disfigured(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) -> Disfigured(x))\n\nRandomised(nerta)\n\nDisfigured(nerta) and Syncopated(nerta) and forall x (Disfigured(x) and Syncopated(x) -> not Randomised(x)) -> therefore not Randomised(nerta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Tre is fruiting. Tre is dustlike. Northrup is goethean. Northrup is biform. Northrup is allogeneic. Northrup is devoted. Northrup is fruiting. Northrup is not donnish. Burgess is donnish. Merrilee is goethean. Merrilee is biform. Merrilee is allogeneic. Merrilee is not devoted. Merrilee is fruiting. Merrilee is dustlike. If Burgess is not dustlike then Burgess is not fruiting. If Northrup is fruiting and Northrup is biform then Northrup is not donnish. Quiet, allogeneic people are goethean. All dustlike people are goethean. Smart people are goethean. All biform, fruiting people are not donnish. If someone is donnish and not fruiting then they are biform. If someone is goethean then they are biform. Tre is biform.", "logic": "\nFruiting(tre)\nDustlike(tre)\nGoethean(northrup)\nBiform(northrup)\nAllogeneic(northrup)\nDevoted(northrup)\nFruiting(northrup)\nnot Donnish(northrup)\nDonnish(burgess)\nGoethean(merrilee)\nBiform(merrilee)\nAllogeneic(merrilee)\nnot Devoted(merrilee)\nFruiting(merrilee)\nDustlike(merrilee)\nnot Dustlike(burgess) -> not Fruiting(burgess)\nFruiting(northrup) and Biform(northrup) -> not Donnish(northrup)\nforall x (Fruiting(x) and Allogeneic(x) -> Goethean(x))\nforall x (Dustlike(x) -> Goethean(x))\nforall x (Donnish(x) -> Goethean(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) and Fruiting(x) -> not Donnish(x))\nforall x (Donnish(x) and not Fruiting(x) -> Biform(x))\nforall x (Goethean(x) -> Biform(x))\n\nBiform(tre)\n\nDustlike(tre) and forall x (Dustlike(x) -> Goethean(x)) -> therefore Goethean(tre) Goethean(tre) and forall x (Goethean(x) -> Biform(x)) -> therefore Biform(tre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Brenda is argent. Brenda is loose. Florice is crazy. Florice is louche. Florice is gouty. Florice is nagging. Florice is argent. Florice is not coiling. Hetty is coiling. Aleks is crazy. Aleks is louche. Aleks is gouty. Aleks is not nagging. Aleks is argent. Aleks is loose. If Hetty is not loose then Hetty is not argent. If Florice is argent and Florice is louche then Florice is not coiling. Quiet, gouty people are crazy. All loose people are crazy. Smart people are crazy. All louche, argent people are not coiling. If someone is coiling and not argent then they are louche. If someone is crazy then they are louche. Brenda is not louche.", "logic": "\nArgent(brenda)\nLoose(brenda)\nCrazy(florice)\nLouche(florice)\nGouty(florice)\nNagging(florice)\nArgent(florice)\nnot Coiling(florice)\nCoiling(hetty)\nCrazy(aleks)\nLouche(aleks)\nGouty(aleks)\nnot Nagging(aleks)\nArgent(aleks)\nLoose(aleks)\nnot Loose(hetty) -> not Argent(hetty)\nArgent(florice) and Louche(florice) -> not Coiling(florice)\nforall x (Argent(x) and Gouty(x) -> Crazy(x))\nforall x (Loose(x) -> Crazy(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Crazy(x))\nforall x (Louche(x) and Argent(x) -> not Coiling(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) and not Argent(x) -> Louche(x))\nforall x (Crazy(x) -> Louche(x))\n\nnot Louche(brenda)\n\nLoose(brenda) and forall x (Loose(x) -> Crazy(x)) -> therefore Crazy(brenda) Crazy(brenda) and forall x (Crazy(x) -> Louche(x)) -> therefore Louche(brenda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Melany is brushlike. Melany is unsilenced. Stephanie is couchant. Stephanie is lunar. Stephanie is brachial. Stephanie is bitter. Stephanie is brushlike. Stephanie is not electric. Reggy is electric. Nathaniel is couchant. Nathaniel is lunar. Nathaniel is brachial. Nathaniel is not bitter. Nathaniel is brushlike. Nathaniel is unsilenced. If Reggy is not unsilenced then Reggy is not brushlike. If Stephanie is brushlike and Stephanie is lunar then Stephanie is not electric. Quiet, brachial people are couchant. All unsilenced people are couchant. Smart people are couchant. All lunar, brushlike people are not electric. If someone is electric and not brushlike then they are lunar. If someone is couchant then they are lunar. Melany is not electric.", "logic": "\nBrushlike(melany)\nUnsilenced(melany)\nCouchant(stephanie)\nLunar(stephanie)\nBrachial(stephanie)\nBitter(stephanie)\nBrushlike(stephanie)\nnot Electric(stephanie)\nElectric(reggy)\nCouchant(nathaniel)\nLunar(nathaniel)\nBrachial(nathaniel)\nnot Bitter(nathaniel)\nBrushlike(nathaniel)\nUnsilenced(nathaniel)\nnot Unsilenced(reggy) -> not Brushlike(reggy)\nBrushlike(stephanie) and Lunar(stephanie) -> not Electric(stephanie)\nforall x (Brushlike(x) and Brachial(x) -> Couchant(x))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Couchant(x))\nforall x (Electric(x) -> Couchant(x))\nforall x (Lunar(x) and Brushlike(x) -> not Electric(x))\nforall x (Electric(x) and not Brushlike(x) -> Lunar(x))\nforall x (Couchant(x) -> Lunar(x))\n\nnot Electric(melany)\n\nUnsilenced(melany) and forall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Couchant(x)) -> therefore Couchant(melany) Couchant(melany) and forall x (Couchant(x) -> Lunar(x)) -> therefore Lunar(melany) Lunar(melany) and Brushlike(melany) and forall x (Lunar(x) and Brushlike(x) -> not Electric(x)) -> therefore not Electric(melany)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Syd is tuneless. Syd is excusatory. Josiah is soused. Josiah is blemished. Josiah is wartlike. Josiah is labelled. Josiah is tuneless. Josiah is not speedy. Crawford is speedy. Suzzy is soused. Suzzy is blemished. Suzzy is wartlike. Suzzy is not labelled. Suzzy is tuneless. Suzzy is excusatory. If Crawford is not excusatory then Crawford is not tuneless. If Josiah is tuneless and Josiah is blemished then Josiah is not speedy. Quiet, wartlike people are soused. All excusatory people are soused. Smart people are soused. All blemished, tuneless people are not speedy. If someone is speedy and not tuneless then they are blemished. If someone is soused then they are blemished. Syd is speedy.", "logic": "\nTuneless(syd)\nExcusatory(syd)\nSoused(josiah)\nBlemished(josiah)\nWartlike(josiah)\nLabelled(josiah)\nTuneless(josiah)\nnot Speedy(josiah)\nSpeedy(crawford)\nSoused(suzzy)\nBlemished(suzzy)\nWartlike(suzzy)\nnot Labelled(suzzy)\nTuneless(suzzy)\nExcusatory(suzzy)\nnot Excusatory(crawford) -> not Tuneless(crawford)\nTuneless(josiah) and Blemished(josiah) -> not Speedy(josiah)\nforall x (Tuneless(x) and Wartlike(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) and Tuneless(x) -> not Speedy(x))\nforall x (Speedy(x) and not Tuneless(x) -> Blemished(x))\nforall x (Soused(x) -> Blemished(x))\n\nSpeedy(syd)\n\nExcusatory(syd) and forall x (Excusatory(x) -> Soused(x)) -> therefore Soused(syd) Soused(syd) and forall x (Soused(x) -> Blemished(x)) -> therefore Blemished(syd) Blemished(syd) and Tuneless(syd) and forall x (Blemished(x) and Tuneless(x) -> not Speedy(x)) -> therefore not Speedy(syd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Darci is yearlong. Darci is unguided. Sunny is twelve. Sunny is fleet. Sunny is fraternal. Sunny is forbidding. Sunny is yearlong. Sunny is not equipped. Hinda is equipped. Cari is twelve. Cari is fleet. Cari is fraternal. Cari is not forbidding. Cari is yearlong. Cari is unguided. If Hinda is not unguided then Hinda is not yearlong. If Sunny is yearlong and Sunny is fleet then Sunny is not equipped. Quiet, fraternal people are twelve. All unguided people are twelve. Smart people are twelve. All fleet, yearlong people are not equipped. If someone is equipped and not yearlong then they are fleet. If someone is twelve then they are fleet. Hinda is not yearlong.", "logic": "\nYearlong(darci)\nUnguided(darci)\nTwelve(sunny)\nFleet(sunny)\nFraternal(sunny)\nForbidding(sunny)\nYearlong(sunny)\nnot Equipped(sunny)\nEquipped(hinda)\nTwelve(cari)\nFleet(cari)\nFraternal(cari)\nnot Forbidding(cari)\nYearlong(cari)\nUnguided(cari)\nnot Unguided(hinda) -> not Yearlong(hinda)\nYearlong(sunny) and Fleet(sunny) -> not Equipped(sunny)\nforall x (Yearlong(x) and Fraternal(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Equipped(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Fleet(x) and Yearlong(x) -> not Equipped(x))\nforall x (Equipped(x) and not Yearlong(x) -> Fleet(x))\nforall x (Twelve(x) -> Fleet(x))\n\nnot Yearlong(hinda)\n\nnot Yearlong(hinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Tasia is roasted. Tasia is perversive. Maxwell is fumed. Maxwell is spacey. Maxwell is frankish. Maxwell is sumptuary. Maxwell is roasted. Maxwell is not uniform. Caril is uniform. Eden is fumed. Eden is spacey. Eden is frankish. Eden is not sumptuary. Eden is roasted. Eden is perversive. If Caril is not perversive then Caril is not roasted. If Maxwell is roasted and Maxwell is spacey then Maxwell is not uniform. Quiet, frankish people are fumed. All perversive people are fumed. Smart people are fumed. All spacey, roasted people are not uniform. If someone is uniform and not roasted then they are spacey. If someone is fumed then they are spacey. Maxwell is perversive.", "logic": "\nRoasted(tasia)\nPerversive(tasia)\nFumed(maxwell)\nSpacey(maxwell)\nFrankish(maxwell)\nSumptuary(maxwell)\nRoasted(maxwell)\nnot Uniform(maxwell)\nUniform(caril)\nFumed(eden)\nSpacey(eden)\nFrankish(eden)\nnot Sumptuary(eden)\nRoasted(eden)\nPerversive(eden)\nnot Perversive(caril) -> not Roasted(caril)\nRoasted(maxwell) and Spacey(maxwell) -> not Uniform(maxwell)\nforall x (Roasted(x) and Frankish(x) -> Fumed(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Fumed(x))\nforall x (Uniform(x) -> Fumed(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) and Roasted(x) -> not Uniform(x))\nforall x (Uniform(x) and not Roasted(x) -> Spacey(x))\nforall x (Fumed(x) -> Spacey(x))\n\nPerversive(maxwell)\n\nPerversive(maxwell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Dew is littler. Dew is patrician. Jarrett is polyploid. Jarrett is placid. Jarrett is moldy. Jarrett is best. Jarrett is littler. Jarrett is not innocuous. Michael is innocuous. Elbert is polyploid. Elbert is placid. Elbert is moldy. Elbert is not best. Elbert is littler. Elbert is patrician. If Michael is not patrician then Michael is not littler. If Jarrett is littler and Jarrett is placid then Jarrett is not innocuous. Quiet, moldy people are polyploid. All patrician people are polyploid. Smart people are polyploid. All placid, littler people are not innocuous. If someone is innocuous and not littler then they are placid. If someone is polyploid then they are placid. Dew is not moldy.", "logic": "\nLittler(dew)\nPatrician(dew)\nPolyploid(jarrett)\nPlacid(jarrett)\nMoldy(jarrett)\nBest(jarrett)\nLittler(jarrett)\nnot Innocuous(jarrett)\nInnocuous(michael)\nPolyploid(elbert)\nPlacid(elbert)\nMoldy(elbert)\nnot Best(elbert)\nLittler(elbert)\nPatrician(elbert)\nnot Patrician(michael) -> not Littler(michael)\nLittler(jarrett) and Placid(jarrett) -> not Innocuous(jarrett)\nforall x (Littler(x) and Moldy(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Patrician(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) and Littler(x) -> not Innocuous(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) and not Littler(x) -> Placid(x))\nforall x (Polyploid(x) -> Placid(x))\n\nnot Moldy(dew)\n\nnot Moldy(dew) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Gregory is stomatal. Gregory is retrousse. Debbra is antemortem. Debbra is unequalled. Debbra is missionary. Debbra is sublimated. Debbra is stomatal. Debbra is not taoist. Cappella is taoist. Jermayne is antemortem. Jermayne is unequalled. Jermayne is missionary. Jermayne is not sublimated. Jermayne is stomatal. Jermayne is retrousse. If Cappella is not retrousse then Cappella is not stomatal. If Debbra is stomatal and Debbra is unequalled then Debbra is not taoist. Quiet, missionary people are antemortem. All retrousse people are antemortem. Smart people are antemortem. All unequalled, stomatal people are not taoist. If someone is taoist and not stomatal then they are unequalled. If someone is antemortem then they are unequalled. Cappella is retrousse.", "logic": "\nStomatal(gregory)\nRetrousse(gregory)\nAntemortem(debbra)\nUnequalled(debbra)\nMissionary(debbra)\nSublimated(debbra)\nStomatal(debbra)\nnot Taoist(debbra)\nTaoist(cappella)\nAntemortem(jermayne)\nUnequalled(jermayne)\nMissionary(jermayne)\nnot Sublimated(jermayne)\nStomatal(jermayne)\nRetrousse(jermayne)\nnot Retrousse(cappella) -> not Stomatal(cappella)\nStomatal(debbra) and Unequalled(debbra) -> not Taoist(debbra)\nforall x (Stomatal(x) and Missionary(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Retrousse(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Unequalled(x) and Stomatal(x) -> not Taoist(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) and not Stomatal(x) -> Unequalled(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> Unequalled(x))\n\nRetrousse(cappella)\n\nRetrousse(cappella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Enriqueta is icky. Enriqueta is scurrying. Kellina is animist. Kellina is single. Kellina is selected. Kellina is aculeated. Kellina is icky. Kellina is not sciolistic. Corrie is sciolistic. Dara is animist. Dara is single. Dara is selected. Dara is not aculeated. Dara is icky. Dara is scurrying. If Corrie is not scurrying then Corrie is not icky. If Kellina is icky and Kellina is single then Kellina is not sciolistic. Quiet, selected people are animist. All scurrying people are animist. Smart people are animist. All single, icky people are not sciolistic. If someone is sciolistic and not icky then they are single. If someone is animist then they are single. Enriqueta is not aculeated.", "logic": "\nIcky(enriqueta)\nScurrying(enriqueta)\nAnimist(kellina)\nSingle(kellina)\nSelected(kellina)\nAculeated(kellina)\nIcky(kellina)\nnot Sciolistic(kellina)\nSciolistic(corrie)\nAnimist(dara)\nSingle(dara)\nSelected(dara)\nnot Aculeated(dara)\nIcky(dara)\nScurrying(dara)\nnot Scurrying(corrie) -> not Icky(corrie)\nIcky(kellina) and Single(kellina) -> not Sciolistic(kellina)\nforall x (Icky(x) and Selected(x) -> Animist(x))\nforall x (Scurrying(x) -> Animist(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) -> Animist(x))\nforall x (Single(x) and Icky(x) -> not Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) and not Icky(x) -> Single(x))\nforall x (Animist(x) -> Single(x))\n\nnot Aculeated(enriqueta)\n\nnot Aculeated(enriqueta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "Sibley is chordal. Sibley is favored. Nil is nonporous. Nil is sisyphean. Nil is salverform. Nil is immutable. Nil is chordal. Nil is not lanceolate. Noelle is lanceolate. Norris is nonporous. Norris is sisyphean. Norris is salverform. Norris is not immutable. Norris is chordal. Norris is favored. If Noelle is not favored then Noelle is not chordal. If Nil is chordal and Nil is sisyphean then Nil is not lanceolate. Quiet, salverform people are nonporous. All favored people are nonporous. Smart people are nonporous. All sisyphean, chordal people are not lanceolate. If someone is lanceolate and not chordal then they are sisyphean. If someone is nonporous then they are sisyphean. Noelle is salverform.", "logic": "\nChordal(sibley)\nFavored(sibley)\nNonporous(nil)\nSisyphean(nil)\nSalverform(nil)\nImmutable(nil)\nChordal(nil)\nnot Lanceolate(nil)\nLanceolate(noelle)\nNonporous(norris)\nSisyphean(norris)\nSalverform(norris)\nnot Immutable(norris)\nChordal(norris)\nFavored(norris)\nnot Favored(noelle) -> not Chordal(noelle)\nChordal(nil) and Sisyphean(nil) -> not Lanceolate(nil)\nforall x (Chordal(x) and Salverform(x) -> Nonporous(x))\nforall x (Favored(x) -> Nonporous(x))\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) -> Nonporous(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Chordal(x) -> not Lanceolate(x))\nforall x (Lanceolate(x) and not Chordal(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Nonporous(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\n\nSalverform(noelle)\n\nSalverform(noelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1274"} {"premises": "The marinna is not charming. The marinna is liable. The marinna is chatty. The marinna is untuneful. The marinna is provencal. The marinna does not like the arron. The marinna does not see the arron. The marinna backpack the arron. The arron is charming. The arron is liable. The arron is not chatty. The arron is not untuneful. The arron is provencal. The arron does not like the marinna. The arron unhook the marinna. The arron backpack the marinna. If the marinna does not visit the arron then the marinna unhook the arron. If something backpack the marinna then it does not like the arron. If something snowmobile the marinna and it backpack the arron then it is provencal. The arron is not untuneful.", "logic": "\nnot Charming(marinna)\nLiable(marinna)\nChatty(marinna)\nUntuneful(marinna)\nProvencal(marinna)\nnot Snowmobile(marinna, arron)\nnot Unhook(marinna, arron)\nBackpack(marinna, arron)\nCharming(arron)\nLiable(arron)\nnot Chatty(arron)\nnot Untuneful(arron)\nProvencal(arron)\nnot Snowmobile(arron, marinna)\nUnhook(arron, marinna)\nBackpack(arron, marinna)\nnot Backpack(marinna, arron) -> Unhook(marinna, arron)\nforall x (Backpack(x, marinna) -> not Snowmobile(x, arron))\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, marinna) and Backpack(x, arron) -> Provencal(x))\n\nnot Untuneful(arron)\n\ntherefore not Untuneful(arron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "The reg is not thickening. The reg is cosmogonic. The reg is wise. The reg is beamish. The reg is dismaying. The reg does not like the nana. The reg does not see the nana. The reg tremble the nana. The nana is thickening. The nana is cosmogonic. The nana is not wise. The nana is not beamish. The nana is dismaying. The nana does not like the reg. The nana refine the reg. The nana tremble the reg. If the reg does not visit the nana then the reg refine the nana. If something tremble the reg then it does not like the nana. If something braille the reg and it tremble the nana then it is dismaying. The reg does not visit the nana.", "logic": "\nnot Thickening(reg)\nCosmogonic(reg)\nWise(reg)\nBeamish(reg)\nDismaying(reg)\nnot Braille(reg, nana)\nnot Refine(reg, nana)\nTremble(reg, nana)\nThickening(nana)\nCosmogonic(nana)\nnot Wise(nana)\nnot Beamish(nana)\nDismaying(nana)\nnot Braille(nana, reg)\nRefine(nana, reg)\nTremble(nana, reg)\nnot Tremble(reg, nana) -> Refine(reg, nana)\nforall x (Tremble(x, reg) -> not Braille(x, nana))\nforall x (Braille(x, reg) and Tremble(x, nana) -> Dismaying(x))\n\nnot Tremble(reg, nana)\n\ntherefore Tremble(reg, nana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "The elwin is not dormie. The elwin is unmerited. The elwin is ironic. The elwin is mown. The elwin is immortal. The elwin does not like the dorelle. The elwin does not see the dorelle. The elwin pillage the dorelle. The dorelle is dormie. The dorelle is unmerited. The dorelle is not ironic. The dorelle is not mown. The dorelle is immortal. The dorelle does not like the elwin. The dorelle insolate the elwin. The dorelle pillage the elwin. If the elwin does not visit the dorelle then the elwin insolate the dorelle. If something pillage the elwin then it does not like the dorelle. If something blarney the elwin and it pillage the dorelle then it is immortal. The dorelle does not like the dorelle.", "logic": "\nnot Dormie(elwin)\nUnmerited(elwin)\nIronic(elwin)\nMown(elwin)\nImmortal(elwin)\nnot Blarney(elwin, dorelle)\nnot Insolate(elwin, dorelle)\nPillage(elwin, dorelle)\nDormie(dorelle)\nUnmerited(dorelle)\nnot Ironic(dorelle)\nnot Mown(dorelle)\nImmortal(dorelle)\nnot Blarney(dorelle, elwin)\nInsolate(dorelle, elwin)\nPillage(dorelle, elwin)\nnot Pillage(elwin, dorelle) -> Insolate(elwin, dorelle)\nforall x (Pillage(x, elwin) -> not Blarney(x, dorelle))\nforall x (Blarney(x, elwin) and Pillage(x, dorelle) -> Immortal(x))\n\nnot Blarney(dorelle, dorelle)\n\nPillage(dorelle, elwin) and forall x (Pillage(x, elwin) -> not Blarney(x, dorelle)) -> therefore not Blarney(dorelle, dorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "The sheridan is not unblushing. The sheridan is unreadable. The sheridan is limacoid. The sheridan is dimorphous. The sheridan is allogeneic. The sheridan does not like the phelia. The sheridan does not see the phelia. The sheridan misinform the phelia. The phelia is unblushing. The phelia is unreadable. The phelia is not limacoid. The phelia is not dimorphous. The phelia is allogeneic. The phelia does not like the sheridan. The phelia divest the sheridan. The phelia misinform the sheridan. If the sheridan does not visit the phelia then the sheridan divest the phelia. If something misinform the sheridan then it does not like the phelia. If something loose the sheridan and it misinform the phelia then it is allogeneic. The phelia loose the phelia.", "logic": "\nnot Unblushing(sheridan)\nUnreadable(sheridan)\nLimacoid(sheridan)\nDimorphous(sheridan)\nAllogeneic(sheridan)\nnot Loose(sheridan, phelia)\nnot Divest(sheridan, phelia)\nMisinform(sheridan, phelia)\nUnblushing(phelia)\nUnreadable(phelia)\nnot Limacoid(phelia)\nnot Dimorphous(phelia)\nAllogeneic(phelia)\nnot Loose(phelia, sheridan)\nDivest(phelia, sheridan)\nMisinform(phelia, sheridan)\nnot Misinform(sheridan, phelia) -> Divest(sheridan, phelia)\nforall x (Misinform(x, sheridan) -> not Loose(x, phelia))\nforall x (Loose(x, sheridan) and Misinform(x, phelia) -> Allogeneic(x))\n\nLoose(phelia, phelia)\n\nMisinform(phelia, sheridan) and forall x (Misinform(x, sheridan) -> not Loose(x, phelia)) -> therefore not Loose(phelia, phelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "The yardley is not southward. The yardley is twoscore. The yardley is pizzicato. The yardley is weblike. The yardley is defeated. The yardley does not like the andromeda. The yardley does not see the andromeda. The yardley spiel the andromeda. The andromeda is southward. The andromeda is twoscore. The andromeda is not pizzicato. The andromeda is not weblike. The andromeda is defeated. The andromeda does not like the yardley. The andromeda docket the yardley. The andromeda spiel the yardley. If the yardley does not visit the andromeda then the yardley docket the andromeda. If something spiel the yardley then it does not like the andromeda. If something plagiarize the yardley and it spiel the andromeda then it is defeated. The andromeda does not visit the andromeda.", "logic": "\nnot Southward(yardley)\nTwoscore(yardley)\nPizzicato(yardley)\nWeblike(yardley)\nDefeated(yardley)\nnot Plagiarize(yardley, andromeda)\nnot Docket(yardley, andromeda)\nSpiel(yardley, andromeda)\nSouthward(andromeda)\nTwoscore(andromeda)\nnot Pizzicato(andromeda)\nnot Weblike(andromeda)\nDefeated(andromeda)\nnot Plagiarize(andromeda, yardley)\nDocket(andromeda, yardley)\nSpiel(andromeda, yardley)\nnot Spiel(yardley, andromeda) -> Docket(yardley, andromeda)\nforall x (Spiel(x, yardley) -> not Plagiarize(x, andromeda))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, yardley) and Spiel(x, andromeda) -> Defeated(x))\n\nnot Spiel(andromeda, andromeda)\n\nnot Spiel(andromeda, andromeda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "The liora is not natal. The liora is undomestic. The liora is sibilant. The liora is horrifying. The liora is areolar. The liora does not like the cara. The liora does not see the cara. The liora bonk the cara. The cara is natal. The cara is undomestic. The cara is not sibilant. The cara is not horrifying. The cara is areolar. The cara does not like the liora. The cara chasten the liora. The cara bonk the liora. If the liora does not visit the cara then the liora chasten the cara. If something bonk the liora then it does not like the cara. If something blench the liora and it bonk the cara then it is areolar. The cara chasten the cara.", "logic": "\nnot Natal(liora)\nUndomestic(liora)\nSibilant(liora)\nHorrifying(liora)\nAreolar(liora)\nnot Blench(liora, cara)\nnot Chasten(liora, cara)\nBonk(liora, cara)\nNatal(cara)\nUndomestic(cara)\nnot Sibilant(cara)\nnot Horrifying(cara)\nAreolar(cara)\nnot Blench(cara, liora)\nChasten(cara, liora)\nBonk(cara, liora)\nnot Bonk(liora, cara) -> Chasten(liora, cara)\nforall x (Bonk(x, liora) -> not Blench(x, cara))\nforall x (Blench(x, liora) and Bonk(x, cara) -> Areolar(x))\n\nChasten(cara, cara)\n\nChasten(cara, cara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "The harv is not overgrown. The harv is ghoulish. The harv is swaggering. The harv is chimeral. The harv is pickled. The harv does not like the gussie. The harv does not see the gussie. The harv rove the gussie. The gussie is overgrown. The gussie is ghoulish. The gussie is not swaggering. The gussie is not chimeral. The gussie is pickled. The gussie does not like the harv. The gussie outvie the harv. The gussie rove the harv. If the harv does not visit the gussie then the harv outvie the gussie. If something rove the harv then it does not like the gussie. If something altercate the harv and it rove the gussie then it is pickled. The harv does not like the harv.", "logic": "\nnot Overgrown(harv)\nGhoulish(harv)\nSwaggering(harv)\nChimeral(harv)\nPickled(harv)\nnot Altercate(harv, gussie)\nnot Outvie(harv, gussie)\nRove(harv, gussie)\nOvergrown(gussie)\nGhoulish(gussie)\nnot Swaggering(gussie)\nnot Chimeral(gussie)\nPickled(gussie)\nnot Altercate(gussie, harv)\nOutvie(gussie, harv)\nRove(gussie, harv)\nnot Rove(harv, gussie) -> Outvie(harv, gussie)\nforall x (Rove(x, harv) -> not Altercate(x, gussie))\nforall x (Altercate(x, harv) and Rove(x, gussie) -> Pickled(x))\n\nnot Altercate(harv, harv)\n\nnot Altercate(harv, harv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "The faye is not lovesome. The faye is unreleased. The faye is unsoured. The faye is obnoxious. The faye is womanly. The faye does not like the jamey. The faye does not see the jamey. The faye spray the jamey. The jamey is lovesome. The jamey is unreleased. The jamey is not unsoured. The jamey is not obnoxious. The jamey is womanly. The jamey does not like the faye. The jamey curdle the faye. The jamey spray the faye. If the faye does not visit the jamey then the faye curdle the jamey. If something spray the faye then it does not like the jamey. If something twitch the faye and it spray the jamey then it is womanly. The faye curdle the faye.", "logic": "\nnot Lovesome(faye)\nUnreleased(faye)\nUnsoured(faye)\nObnoxious(faye)\nWomanly(faye)\nnot Twitch(faye, jamey)\nnot Curdle(faye, jamey)\nSpray(faye, jamey)\nLovesome(jamey)\nUnreleased(jamey)\nnot Unsoured(jamey)\nnot Obnoxious(jamey)\nWomanly(jamey)\nnot Twitch(jamey, faye)\nCurdle(jamey, faye)\nSpray(jamey, faye)\nnot Spray(faye, jamey) -> Curdle(faye, jamey)\nforall x (Spray(x, faye) -> not Twitch(x, jamey))\nforall x (Twitch(x, faye) and Spray(x, jamey) -> Womanly(x))\n\nCurdle(faye, faye)\n\nCurdle(faye, faye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-3035"} {"premises": "Camella is unethical. Camella is moribund. Camella is gastric. Ninette is mettlesome. Ninette is not matched. Ninette is unethical. Ninette is moribund. Ninette is not styleless. Ninette is homey. Lonna is mettlesome. Lonna is moribund. Lonna is not styleless. If Lonna is gastric and Lonna is moribund then Lonna is matched. Blue people are unethical. If someone is moribund and not styleless then they are gastric. Lonna is moribund.", "logic": "\nUnethical(camella)\nMoribund(camella)\nGastric(camella)\nMettlesome(ninette)\nnot Matched(ninette)\nUnethical(ninette)\nMoribund(ninette)\nnot Styleless(ninette)\nHomey(ninette)\nMettlesome(lonna)\nMoribund(lonna)\nnot Styleless(lonna)\nGastric(lonna) and Moribund(lonna) -> Matched(lonna)\nforall x (Matched(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Moribund(x) and not Styleless(x) -> Gastric(x))\n\nMoribund(lonna)\n\ntherefore Moribund(lonna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Grace is contrasty. Grace is panoptical. Grace is pally. Caria is baptized. Caria is not meditative. Caria is contrasty. Caria is panoptical. Caria is not instinct. Caria is boffo. Manny is baptized. Manny is panoptical. Manny is not instinct. If Manny is pally and Manny is panoptical then Manny is meditative. Blue people are contrasty. If someone is panoptical and not instinct then they are pally. Manny is not panoptical.", "logic": "\nContrasty(grace)\nPanoptical(grace)\nPally(grace)\nBaptized(caria)\nnot Meditative(caria)\nContrasty(caria)\nPanoptical(caria)\nnot Instinct(caria)\nBoffo(caria)\nBaptized(manny)\nPanoptical(manny)\nnot Instinct(manny)\nPally(manny) and Panoptical(manny) -> Meditative(manny)\nforall x (Meditative(x) -> Contrasty(x))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) and not Instinct(x) -> Pally(x))\n\nnot Panoptical(manny)\n\ntherefore Panoptical(manny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Paolo is corrosive. Paolo is idiotic. Paolo is undersexed. Byron is southward. Byron is not outfitted. Byron is corrosive. Byron is idiotic. Byron is not doubtful. Byron is overbusy. Piotr is southward. Piotr is idiotic. Piotr is not doubtful. If Piotr is undersexed and Piotr is idiotic then Piotr is outfitted. Blue people are corrosive. If someone is idiotic and not doubtful then they are undersexed. Piotr is undersexed.", "logic": "\nCorrosive(paolo)\nIdiotic(paolo)\nUndersexed(paolo)\nSouthward(byron)\nnot Outfitted(byron)\nCorrosive(byron)\nIdiotic(byron)\nnot Doubtful(byron)\nOverbusy(byron)\nSouthward(piotr)\nIdiotic(piotr)\nnot Doubtful(piotr)\nUndersexed(piotr) and Idiotic(piotr) -> Outfitted(piotr)\nforall x (Outfitted(x) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Idiotic(x) and not Doubtful(x) -> Undersexed(x))\n\nUndersexed(piotr)\n\nIdiotic(piotr) and not Doubtful(piotr) and forall x (Idiotic(x) and not Doubtful(x) -> Undersexed(x)) -> therefore Undersexed(piotr)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Kane is prophetic. Kane is cretaceous. Kane is unshared. Augie is satyrical. Augie is not baboonish. Augie is prophetic. Augie is cretaceous. Augie is not awed. Augie is myocardial. Amalea is satyrical. Amalea is cretaceous. Amalea is not awed. If Amalea is unshared and Amalea is cretaceous then Amalea is baboonish. Blue people are prophetic. If someone is cretaceous and not awed then they are unshared. Amalea is not unshared.", "logic": "\nProphetic(kane)\nCretaceous(kane)\nUnshared(kane)\nSatyrical(augie)\nnot Baboonish(augie)\nProphetic(augie)\nCretaceous(augie)\nnot Awed(augie)\nMyocardial(augie)\nSatyrical(amalea)\nCretaceous(amalea)\nnot Awed(amalea)\nUnshared(amalea) and Cretaceous(amalea) -> Baboonish(amalea)\nforall x (Baboonish(x) -> Prophetic(x))\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) and not Awed(x) -> Unshared(x))\n\nnot Unshared(amalea)\n\nCretaceous(amalea) and not Awed(amalea) and forall x (Cretaceous(x) and not Awed(x) -> Unshared(x)) -> therefore Unshared(amalea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Yettie is inward. Yettie is consensual. Yettie is thrilling. Pete is youngish. Pete is not yearly. Pete is inward. Pete is consensual. Pete is not flocculent. Pete is anuric. Turner is youngish. Turner is consensual. Turner is not flocculent. If Turner is thrilling and Turner is consensual then Turner is yearly. Blue people are inward. If someone is consensual and not flocculent then they are thrilling. Turner is yearly.", "logic": "\nInward(yettie)\nConsensual(yettie)\nThrilling(yettie)\nYoungish(pete)\nnot Yearly(pete)\nInward(pete)\nConsensual(pete)\nnot Flocculent(pete)\nAnuric(pete)\nYoungish(turner)\nConsensual(turner)\nnot Flocculent(turner)\nThrilling(turner) and Consensual(turner) -> Yearly(turner)\nforall x (Yearly(x) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Consensual(x) and not Flocculent(x) -> Thrilling(x))\n\nYearly(turner)\n\nConsensual(turner) and not Flocculent(turner) and forall x (Consensual(x) and not Flocculent(x) -> Thrilling(x)) -> therefore Thrilling(turner) Thrilling(turner) and Consensual(turner) and Thrilling(turner) and Consensual(turner) -> Yearly(turner) -> therefore Yearly(turner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Darian is antiphonal. Darian is untouched. Darian is acrobatic. Alwin is benthic. Alwin is not rickety. Alwin is antiphonal. Alwin is untouched. Alwin is not profuse. Alwin is lowest. Nathan is benthic. Nathan is untouched. Nathan is not profuse. If Nathan is acrobatic and Nathan is untouched then Nathan is rickety. Blue people are antiphonal. If someone is untouched and not profuse then they are acrobatic. Nathan is not rickety.", "logic": "\nAntiphonal(darian)\nUntouched(darian)\nAcrobatic(darian)\nBenthic(alwin)\nnot Rickety(alwin)\nAntiphonal(alwin)\nUntouched(alwin)\nnot Profuse(alwin)\nLowest(alwin)\nBenthic(nathan)\nUntouched(nathan)\nnot Profuse(nathan)\nAcrobatic(nathan) and Untouched(nathan) -> Rickety(nathan)\nforall x (Rickety(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nforall x (Untouched(x) and not Profuse(x) -> Acrobatic(x))\n\nnot Rickety(nathan)\n\nUntouched(nathan) and not Profuse(nathan) and forall x (Untouched(x) and not Profuse(x) -> Acrobatic(x)) -> therefore Acrobatic(nathan) Acrobatic(nathan) and Untouched(nathan) and Acrobatic(nathan) and Untouched(nathan) -> Rickety(nathan) -> therefore Rickety(nathan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Gussy is blest. Gussy is slanting. Gussy is slaphappy. Vladimir is seeping. Vladimir is not songlike. Vladimir is blest. Vladimir is slanting. Vladimir is not paradisal. Vladimir is reformed. Maren is seeping. Maren is slanting. Maren is not paradisal. If Maren is slaphappy and Maren is slanting then Maren is songlike. Blue people are blest. If someone is slanting and not paradisal then they are slaphappy. Maren is blest.", "logic": "\nBlest(gussy)\nSlanting(gussy)\nSlaphappy(gussy)\nSeeping(vladimir)\nnot Songlike(vladimir)\nBlest(vladimir)\nSlanting(vladimir)\nnot Paradisal(vladimir)\nReformed(vladimir)\nSeeping(maren)\nSlanting(maren)\nnot Paradisal(maren)\nSlaphappy(maren) and Slanting(maren) -> Songlike(maren)\nforall x (Songlike(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) and not Paradisal(x) -> Slaphappy(x))\n\nBlest(maren)\n\nSlanting(maren) and not Paradisal(maren) and forall x (Slanting(x) and not Paradisal(x) -> Slaphappy(x)) -> therefore Slaphappy(maren) Slaphappy(maren) and Slanting(maren) and Slaphappy(maren) and Slanting(maren) -> Songlike(maren) -> therefore Songlike(maren) Songlike(maren) and forall x (Songlike(x) -> Blest(x)) -> therefore Blest(maren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Elnore is mullioned. Elnore is dowdy. Elnore is dumbstruck. Marianna is relative. Marianna is not bushed. Marianna is mullioned. Marianna is dowdy. Marianna is not carousing. Marianna is holophytic. Drea is relative. Drea is dowdy. Drea is not carousing. If Drea is dumbstruck and Drea is dowdy then Drea is bushed. Blue people are mullioned. If someone is dowdy and not carousing then they are dumbstruck. Drea is not mullioned.", "logic": "\nMullioned(elnore)\nDowdy(elnore)\nDumbstruck(elnore)\nRelative(marianna)\nnot Bushed(marianna)\nMullioned(marianna)\nDowdy(marianna)\nnot Carousing(marianna)\nHolophytic(marianna)\nRelative(drea)\nDowdy(drea)\nnot Carousing(drea)\nDumbstruck(drea) and Dowdy(drea) -> Bushed(drea)\nforall x (Bushed(x) -> Mullioned(x))\nforall x (Dowdy(x) and not Carousing(x) -> Dumbstruck(x))\n\nnot Mullioned(drea)\n\nDowdy(drea) and not Carousing(drea) and forall x (Dowdy(x) and not Carousing(x) -> Dumbstruck(x)) -> therefore Dumbstruck(drea) Dumbstruck(drea) and Dowdy(drea) and Dumbstruck(drea) and Dowdy(drea) -> Bushed(drea) -> therefore Bushed(drea) Bushed(drea) and forall x (Bushed(x) -> Mullioned(x)) -> therefore Mullioned(drea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Tiebout is easy. Tiebout is vagile. Tiebout is queer. Marika is obstructed. Marika is not bimonthly. Marika is easy. Marika is vagile. Marika is not sexy. Marika is dominating. Wildon is obstructed. Wildon is vagile. Wildon is not sexy. If Wildon is queer and Wildon is vagile then Wildon is bimonthly. Blue people are easy. If someone is vagile and not sexy then they are queer. Tiebout is not sexy.", "logic": "\nEasy(tiebout)\nVagile(tiebout)\nQueer(tiebout)\nObstructed(marika)\nnot Bimonthly(marika)\nEasy(marika)\nVagile(marika)\nnot Sexy(marika)\nDominating(marika)\nObstructed(wildon)\nVagile(wildon)\nnot Sexy(wildon)\nQueer(wildon) and Vagile(wildon) -> Bimonthly(wildon)\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) -> Easy(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) and not Sexy(x) -> Queer(x))\n\nnot Sexy(tiebout)\n\nnot Sexy(tiebout) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Monique is tentacular. Monique is valent. Monique is sanitized. Myke is gobsmacked. Myke is not wartlike. Myke is tentacular. Myke is valent. Myke is not convergent. Myke is pubertal. Ashely is gobsmacked. Ashely is valent. Ashely is not convergent. If Ashely is sanitized and Ashely is valent then Ashely is wartlike. Blue people are tentacular. If someone is valent and not convergent then they are sanitized. Monique is pubertal.", "logic": "\nTentacular(monique)\nValent(monique)\nSanitized(monique)\nGobsmacked(myke)\nnot Wartlike(myke)\nTentacular(myke)\nValent(myke)\nnot Convergent(myke)\nPubertal(myke)\nGobsmacked(ashely)\nValent(ashely)\nnot Convergent(ashely)\nSanitized(ashely) and Valent(ashely) -> Wartlike(ashely)\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Tentacular(x))\nforall x (Valent(x) and not Convergent(x) -> Sanitized(x))\n\nPubertal(monique)\n\nPubertal(monique) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Peirce is viral. Peirce is repeatable. Peirce is cusped. Nidia is inerrable. Nidia is not shortish. Nidia is viral. Nidia is repeatable. Nidia is not ergotropic. Nidia is meshed. Brice is inerrable. Brice is repeatable. Brice is not ergotropic. If Brice is cusped and Brice is repeatable then Brice is shortish. Blue people are viral. If someone is repeatable and not ergotropic then they are cusped. Peirce is not shortish.", "logic": "\nViral(peirce)\nRepeatable(peirce)\nCusped(peirce)\nInerrable(nidia)\nnot Shortish(nidia)\nViral(nidia)\nRepeatable(nidia)\nnot Ergotropic(nidia)\nMeshed(nidia)\nInerrable(brice)\nRepeatable(brice)\nnot Ergotropic(brice)\nCusped(brice) and Repeatable(brice) -> Shortish(brice)\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Viral(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) and not Ergotropic(x) -> Cusped(x))\n\nnot Shortish(peirce)\n\nnot Shortish(peirce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Carena is unsilenced. Carena is unlined. Carena is venal. Trixi is pushful. Trixi is not middlemost. Trixi is unsilenced. Trixi is unlined. Trixi is not lucullan. Trixi is genic. Hendrick is pushful. Hendrick is unlined. Hendrick is not lucullan. If Hendrick is venal and Hendrick is unlined then Hendrick is middlemost. Blue people are unsilenced. If someone is unlined and not lucullan then they are venal. Hendrick is genic.", "logic": "\nUnsilenced(carena)\nUnlined(carena)\nVenal(carena)\nPushful(trixi)\nnot Middlemost(trixi)\nUnsilenced(trixi)\nUnlined(trixi)\nnot Lucullan(trixi)\nGenic(trixi)\nPushful(hendrick)\nUnlined(hendrick)\nnot Lucullan(hendrick)\nVenal(hendrick) and Unlined(hendrick) -> Middlemost(hendrick)\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Unsilenced(x))\nforall x (Unlined(x) and not Lucullan(x) -> Venal(x))\n\nGenic(hendrick)\n\nGenic(hendrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Garvin is sozzled. Merissa is ramshackle. Levi is ramshackle. Green people are diarrhetic. If Levi is unified and Levi is duteous then Levi is wayward. If Garvin is shared then Garvin is wayward. Red people are sozzled. If Levi is unified then Levi is ramshackle. All diarrhetic people are wayward. All sozzled, unified people are diarrhetic. If someone is unified and sozzled then they are shared. Garvin is sozzled.", "logic": "\nSozzled(garvin)\nRamshackle(merissa)\nRamshackle(levi)\nforall x (Sozzled(x) -> Diarrhetic(x))\nUnified(levi) and Duteous(levi) -> Wayward(levi)\nShared(garvin) -> Wayward(garvin)\nforall x (Ramshackle(x) -> Sozzled(x))\nUnified(levi) -> Ramshackle(levi)\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) -> Wayward(x))\nforall x (Sozzled(x) and Unified(x) -> Diarrhetic(x))\nforall x (Unified(x) and Sozzled(x) -> Shared(x))\n\nSozzled(garvin)\n\ntherefore Sozzled(garvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Raychel is unready. Harley is slack. Marshall is slack. Green people are eastern. If Marshall is guttural and Marshall is bacchantic then Marshall is nodding. If Raychel is beneficent then Raychel is nodding. Red people are unready. If Marshall is guttural then Marshall is slack. All eastern people are nodding. All unready, guttural people are eastern. If someone is guttural and unready then they are beneficent. Raychel is not unready.", "logic": "\nUnready(raychel)\nSlack(harley)\nSlack(marshall)\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Eastern(x))\nGuttural(marshall) and Bacchantic(marshall) -> Nodding(marshall)\nBeneficent(raychel) -> Nodding(raychel)\nforall x (Slack(x) -> Unready(x))\nGuttural(marshall) -> Slack(marshall)\nforall x (Eastern(x) -> Nodding(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) and Guttural(x) -> Eastern(x))\nforall x (Guttural(x) and Unready(x) -> Beneficent(x))\n\nnot Unready(raychel)\n\ntherefore Unready(raychel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Zandra is specific. Bianka is inert. Cecilia is inert. Green people are coastwise. If Cecilia is rasping and Cecilia is palpable then Cecilia is bared. If Zandra is eight then Zandra is bared. Red people are specific. If Cecilia is rasping then Cecilia is inert. All coastwise people are bared. All specific, rasping people are coastwise. If someone is rasping and specific then they are eight. Cecilia is specific.", "logic": "\nSpecific(zandra)\nInert(bianka)\nInert(cecilia)\nforall x (Specific(x) -> Coastwise(x))\nRasping(cecilia) and Palpable(cecilia) -> Bared(cecilia)\nEight(zandra) -> Bared(zandra)\nforall x (Inert(x) -> Specific(x))\nRasping(cecilia) -> Inert(cecilia)\nforall x (Coastwise(x) -> Bared(x))\nforall x (Specific(x) and Rasping(x) -> Coastwise(x))\nforall x (Rasping(x) and Specific(x) -> Eight(x))\n\nSpecific(cecilia)\n\nInert(cecilia) and forall x (Inert(x) -> Specific(x)) -> therefore Specific(cecilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Marylynne is talismanic. Lance is immortal. Myles is immortal. Green people are juvenile. If Myles is authentic and Myles is bare then Myles is contagious. If Marylynne is unlearned then Marylynne is contagious. Red people are talismanic. If Myles is authentic then Myles is immortal. All juvenile people are contagious. All talismanic, authentic people are juvenile. If someone is authentic and talismanic then they are unlearned. Marylynne is not juvenile.", "logic": "\nTalismanic(marylynne)\nImmortal(lance)\nImmortal(myles)\nforall x (Talismanic(x) -> Juvenile(x))\nAuthentic(myles) and Bare(myles) -> Contagious(myles)\nUnlearned(marylynne) -> Contagious(marylynne)\nforall x (Immortal(x) -> Talismanic(x))\nAuthentic(myles) -> Immortal(myles)\nforall x (Juvenile(x) -> Contagious(x))\nforall x (Talismanic(x) and Authentic(x) -> Juvenile(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Talismanic(x) -> Unlearned(x))\n\nnot Juvenile(marylynne)\n\nTalismanic(marylynne) and forall x (Talismanic(x) -> Juvenile(x)) -> therefore Juvenile(marylynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Matilda is sadistic. Rodd is varnished. Audre is varnished. Green people are calculated. If Audre is pure and Audre is incessant then Audre is seven. If Matilda is shrimpy then Matilda is seven. Red people are sadistic. If Audre is pure then Audre is varnished. All calculated people are seven. All sadistic, pure people are calculated. If someone is pure and sadistic then they are shrimpy. Matilda is seven.", "logic": "\nSadistic(matilda)\nVarnished(rodd)\nVarnished(audre)\nforall x (Sadistic(x) -> Calculated(x))\nPure(audre) and Incessant(audre) -> Seven(audre)\nShrimpy(matilda) -> Seven(matilda)\nforall x (Varnished(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nPure(audre) -> Varnished(audre)\nforall x (Calculated(x) -> Seven(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Pure(x) -> Calculated(x))\nforall x (Pure(x) and Sadistic(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\n\nSeven(matilda)\n\nSadistic(matilda) and forall x (Sadistic(x) -> Calculated(x)) -> therefore Calculated(matilda) Calculated(matilda) and forall x (Calculated(x) -> Seven(x)) -> therefore Seven(matilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Mickey is charmed. Dix is unsalable. Hamel is unsalable. Green people are toothsome. If Hamel is dissilient and Hamel is contraband then Hamel is activist. If Mickey is tertiary then Mickey is activist. Red people are charmed. If Hamel is dissilient then Hamel is unsalable. All toothsome people are activist. All charmed, dissilient people are toothsome. If someone is dissilient and charmed then they are tertiary. Hamel is not toothsome.", "logic": "\nCharmed(mickey)\nUnsalable(dix)\nUnsalable(hamel)\nforall x (Charmed(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nDissilient(hamel) and Contraband(hamel) -> Activist(hamel)\nTertiary(mickey) -> Activist(mickey)\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Charmed(x))\nDissilient(hamel) -> Unsalable(hamel)\nforall x (Toothsome(x) -> Activist(x))\nforall x (Charmed(x) and Dissilient(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Dissilient(x) and Charmed(x) -> Tertiary(x))\n\nnot Toothsome(hamel)\n\nUnsalable(hamel) and forall x (Unsalable(x) -> Charmed(x)) -> therefore Charmed(hamel) Charmed(hamel) and forall x (Charmed(x) -> Toothsome(x)) -> therefore Toothsome(hamel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Ulric is citric. Jennings is unobliging. Joslyn is unobliging. Green people are afrikaner. If Joslyn is robust and Joslyn is fulgent then Joslyn is calcic. If Ulric is estranging then Ulric is calcic. Red people are citric. If Joslyn is robust then Joslyn is unobliging. All afrikaner people are calcic. All citric, robust people are afrikaner. If someone is robust and citric then they are estranging. Joslyn is calcic.", "logic": "\nCitric(ulric)\nUnobliging(jennings)\nUnobliging(joslyn)\nforall x (Citric(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nRobust(joslyn) and Fulgent(joslyn) -> Calcic(joslyn)\nEstranging(ulric) -> Calcic(ulric)\nforall x (Unobliging(x) -> Citric(x))\nRobust(joslyn) -> Unobliging(joslyn)\nforall x (Afrikaner(x) -> Calcic(x))\nforall x (Citric(x) and Robust(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Robust(x) and Citric(x) -> Estranging(x))\n\nCalcic(joslyn)\n\nUnobliging(joslyn) and forall x (Unobliging(x) -> Citric(x)) -> therefore Citric(joslyn) Citric(joslyn) and forall x (Citric(x) -> Afrikaner(x)) -> therefore Afrikaner(joslyn) Afrikaner(joslyn) and forall x (Afrikaner(x) -> Calcic(x)) -> therefore Calcic(joslyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Sibella is mandibular. Analise is viii. Vivyan is viii. Green people are known. If Vivyan is thumping and Vivyan is blank then Vivyan is frothing. If Sibella is misleading then Sibella is frothing. Red people are mandibular. If Vivyan is thumping then Vivyan is viii. All known people are frothing. All mandibular, thumping people are known. If someone is thumping and mandibular then they are misleading. Vivyan is not frothing.", "logic": "\nMandibular(sibella)\nViii(analise)\nViii(vivyan)\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Known(x))\nThumping(vivyan) and Blank(vivyan) -> Frothing(vivyan)\nMisleading(sibella) -> Frothing(sibella)\nforall x (Viii(x) -> Mandibular(x))\nThumping(vivyan) -> Viii(vivyan)\nforall x (Known(x) -> Frothing(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) and Thumping(x) -> Known(x))\nforall x (Thumping(x) and Mandibular(x) -> Misleading(x))\n\nnot Frothing(vivyan)\n\nViii(vivyan) and forall x (Viii(x) -> Mandibular(x)) -> therefore Mandibular(vivyan) Mandibular(vivyan) and forall x (Mandibular(x) -> Known(x)) -> therefore Known(vivyan) Known(vivyan) and forall x (Known(x) -> Frothing(x)) -> therefore Frothing(vivyan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Isadora is inartistic. Raine is busted. Husain is busted. Green people are annoyed. If Husain is jingly and Husain is extirpable then Husain is risque. If Isadora is aspherical then Isadora is risque. Red people are inartistic. If Husain is jingly then Husain is busted. All annoyed people are risque. All inartistic, jingly people are annoyed. If someone is jingly and inartistic then they are aspherical. Raine is not aspherical.", "logic": "\nInartistic(isadora)\nBusted(raine)\nBusted(husain)\nforall x (Inartistic(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nJingly(husain) and Extirpable(husain) -> Risque(husain)\nAspherical(isadora) -> Risque(isadora)\nforall x (Busted(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nJingly(husain) -> Busted(husain)\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Risque(x))\nforall x (Inartistic(x) and Jingly(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Jingly(x) and Inartistic(x) -> Aspherical(x))\n\nnot Aspherical(raine)\n\nforall x (Jingly(x) and Inartistic(x) -> Aspherical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Tod is disastrous. Bertram is unsent. Verina is unsent. Green people are conserved. If Verina is carbuncled and Verina is antibiotic then Verina is habitual. If Tod is unbounded then Tod is habitual. Red people are disastrous. If Verina is carbuncled then Verina is unsent. All conserved people are habitual. All disastrous, carbuncled people are conserved. If someone is carbuncled and disastrous then they are unbounded. Tod is unbounded.", "logic": "\nDisastrous(tod)\nUnsent(bertram)\nUnsent(verina)\nforall x (Disastrous(x) -> Conserved(x))\nCarbuncled(verina) and Antibiotic(verina) -> Habitual(verina)\nUnbounded(tod) -> Habitual(tod)\nforall x (Unsent(x) -> Disastrous(x))\nCarbuncled(verina) -> Unsent(verina)\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Habitual(x))\nforall x (Disastrous(x) and Carbuncled(x) -> Conserved(x))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) and Disastrous(x) -> Unbounded(x))\n\nUnbounded(tod)\n\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) and Disastrous(x) -> Unbounded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Donni is scentless. Ardyth is keyless. Neall is keyless. Green people are cloistered. If Neall is alular and Neall is inhuman then Neall is degage. If Donni is phosphoric then Donni is degage. Red people are scentless. If Neall is alular then Neall is keyless. All cloistered people are degage. All scentless, alular people are cloistered. If someone is alular and scentless then they are phosphoric. Neall is not phosphoric.", "logic": "\nScentless(donni)\nKeyless(ardyth)\nKeyless(neall)\nforall x (Scentless(x) -> Cloistered(x))\nAlular(neall) and Inhuman(neall) -> Degage(neall)\nPhosphoric(donni) -> Degage(donni)\nforall x (Keyless(x) -> Scentless(x))\nAlular(neall) -> Keyless(neall)\nforall x (Cloistered(x) -> Degage(x))\nforall x (Scentless(x) and Alular(x) -> Cloistered(x))\nforall x (Alular(x) and Scentless(x) -> Phosphoric(x))\n\nnot Phosphoric(neall)\n\nforall x (Alular(x) and Scentless(x) -> Phosphoric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Amalita is stifling. Wes is unvigilant. Parry is unvigilant. Green people are nursed. If Parry is curtained and Parry is buzzing then Parry is cavalier. If Amalita is placating then Amalita is cavalier. Red people are stifling. If Parry is curtained then Parry is unvigilant. All nursed people are cavalier. All stifling, curtained people are nursed. If someone is curtained and stifling then they are placating. Parry is curtained.", "logic": "\nStifling(amalita)\nUnvigilant(wes)\nUnvigilant(parry)\nforall x (Stifling(x) -> Nursed(x))\nCurtained(parry) and Buzzing(parry) -> Cavalier(parry)\nPlacating(amalita) -> Cavalier(amalita)\nforall x (Unvigilant(x) -> Stifling(x))\nCurtained(parry) -> Unvigilant(parry)\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Stifling(x) and Curtained(x) -> Nursed(x))\nforall x (Curtained(x) and Stifling(x) -> Placating(x))\n\nCurtained(parry)\n\nCurtained(parry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Gussie is straplike. Carlina is leisurely. Morissa is leisurely. Green people are yeasty. If Morissa is unobliging and Morissa is pubertal then Morissa is allied. If Gussie is microbial then Gussie is allied. Red people are straplike. If Morissa is unobliging then Morissa is leisurely. All yeasty people are allied. All straplike, unobliging people are yeasty. If someone is unobliging and straplike then they are microbial. Carlina is not unobliging.", "logic": "\nStraplike(gussie)\nLeisurely(carlina)\nLeisurely(morissa)\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nUnobliging(morissa) and Pubertal(morissa) -> Allied(morissa)\nMicrobial(gussie) -> Allied(gussie)\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Straplike(x))\nUnobliging(morissa) -> Leisurely(morissa)\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Allied(x))\nforall x (Straplike(x) and Unobliging(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Unobliging(x) and Straplike(x) -> Microbial(x))\n\nnot Unobliging(carlina)\n\nnot Unobliging(carlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Hayes is mediatory. Becka is tapering. Friedrich is tapering. Green people are rhymeless. If Friedrich is generous and Friedrich is living then Friedrich is labial. If Hayes is sciolistic then Hayes is labial. Red people are mediatory. If Friedrich is generous then Friedrich is tapering. All rhymeless people are labial. All mediatory, generous people are rhymeless. If someone is generous and mediatory then they are sciolistic. Hayes is living.", "logic": "\nMediatory(hayes)\nTapering(becka)\nTapering(friedrich)\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nGenerous(friedrich) and Living(friedrich) -> Labial(friedrich)\nSciolistic(hayes) -> Labial(hayes)\nforall x (Tapering(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nGenerous(friedrich) -> Tapering(friedrich)\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Labial(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) and Generous(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) and Mediatory(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\n\nLiving(hayes)\n\nLiving(hayes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Idette is nonspatial. Stig is less. Rich is less. Green people are jungly. If Rich is agonised and Rich is lincolnian then Rich is bumptious. If Idette is pretorian then Idette is bumptious. Red people are nonspatial. If Rich is agonised then Rich is less. All jungly people are bumptious. All nonspatial, agonised people are jungly. If someone is agonised and nonspatial then they are pretorian. Rich is not lincolnian.", "logic": "\nNonspatial(idette)\nLess(stig)\nLess(rich)\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Jungly(x))\nAgonised(rich) and Lincolnian(rich) -> Bumptious(rich)\nPretorian(idette) -> Bumptious(idette)\nforall x (Less(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nAgonised(rich) -> Less(rich)\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) and Agonised(x) -> Jungly(x))\nforall x (Agonised(x) and Nonspatial(x) -> Pretorian(x))\n\nnot Lincolnian(rich)\n\nnot Lincolnian(rich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Forrest is hypnogogic. Marijo is weightless. Niven is weightless. Green people are reborn. If Niven is glamourous and Niven is given then Niven is alate. If Forrest is aversive then Forrest is alate. Red people are hypnogogic. If Niven is glamourous then Niven is weightless. All reborn people are alate. All hypnogogic, glamourous people are reborn. If someone is glamourous and hypnogogic then they are aversive. Marijo is given.", "logic": "\nHypnogogic(forrest)\nWeightless(marijo)\nWeightless(niven)\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Reborn(x))\nGlamourous(niven) and Given(niven) -> Alate(niven)\nAversive(forrest) -> Alate(forrest)\nforall x (Weightless(x) -> Hypnogogic(x))\nGlamourous(niven) -> Weightless(niven)\nforall x (Reborn(x) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Glamourous(x) -> Reborn(x))\nforall x (Glamourous(x) and Hypnogogic(x) -> Aversive(x))\n\nGiven(marijo)\n\nGiven(marijo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-363"} {"premises": "Katharine is verified. Katharine is kempt. Katharine is malted. Fritz is cousinly. Fritz is koranic. Fritz is kempt. Vina is creole. Vina is malted. Annabel is norman. Annabel is malted. If someone is verified then they are kempt. Big people are verified. If someone is norman and malted then they are cousinly. Vina is creole.", "logic": "\nVerified(katharine)\nKempt(katharine)\nMalted(katharine)\nCousinly(fritz)\nKoranic(fritz)\nKempt(fritz)\nCreole(vina)\nMalted(vina)\nNorman(annabel)\nMalted(annabel)\nforall x (Verified(x) -> Kempt(x))\nforall x (Cousinly(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Norman(x) and Malted(x) -> Cousinly(x))\n\nCreole(vina)\n\ntherefore Creole(vina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Cabrina is shriveled. Cabrina is agonistic. Cabrina is gentle. Zary is unbeholden. Zary is transposed. Zary is agonistic. Ron is fusible. Ron is gentle. Babs is interred. Babs is gentle. If someone is shriveled then they are agonistic. Big people are shriveled. If someone is interred and gentle then they are unbeholden. Ron is not fusible.", "logic": "\nShriveled(cabrina)\nAgonistic(cabrina)\nGentle(cabrina)\nUnbeholden(zary)\nTransposed(zary)\nAgonistic(zary)\nFusible(ron)\nGentle(ron)\nInterred(babs)\nGentle(babs)\nforall x (Shriveled(x) -> Agonistic(x))\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) -> Shriveled(x))\nforall x (Interred(x) and Gentle(x) -> Unbeholden(x))\n\nnot Fusible(ron)\n\ntherefore Fusible(ron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Odelinda is shellproof. Odelinda is gowned. Odelinda is tonal. Lolita is fluid. Lolita is wacky. Lolita is gowned. Moya is barefaced. Moya is tonal. Zorana is voltarean. Zorana is tonal. If someone is shellproof then they are gowned. Big people are shellproof. If someone is voltarean and tonal then they are fluid. Lolita is shellproof.", "logic": "\nShellproof(odelinda)\nGowned(odelinda)\nTonal(odelinda)\nFluid(lolita)\nWacky(lolita)\nGowned(lolita)\nBarefaced(moya)\nTonal(moya)\nVoltarean(zorana)\nTonal(zorana)\nforall x (Shellproof(x) -> Gowned(x))\nforall x (Fluid(x) -> Shellproof(x))\nforall x (Voltarean(x) and Tonal(x) -> Fluid(x))\n\nShellproof(lolita)\n\nFluid(lolita) and forall x (Fluid(x) -> Shellproof(x)) -> therefore Shellproof(lolita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Myrlene is tired. Myrlene is unshackled. Myrlene is unforceful. Mauricio is coaxial. Mauricio is tawny. Mauricio is unshackled. Lucien is unfueled. Lucien is unforceful. Mimi is bothersome. Mimi is unforceful. If someone is tired then they are unshackled. Big people are tired. If someone is bothersome and unforceful then they are coaxial. Mimi is not coaxial.", "logic": "\nTired(myrlene)\nUnshackled(myrlene)\nUnforceful(myrlene)\nCoaxial(mauricio)\nTawny(mauricio)\nUnshackled(mauricio)\nUnfueled(lucien)\nUnforceful(lucien)\nBothersome(mimi)\nUnforceful(mimi)\nforall x (Tired(x) -> Unshackled(x))\nforall x (Coaxial(x) -> Tired(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) and Unforceful(x) -> Coaxial(x))\n\nnot Coaxial(mimi)\n\nBothersome(mimi) and Unforceful(mimi) and forall x (Bothersome(x) and Unforceful(x) -> Coaxial(x)) -> therefore Coaxial(mimi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Beret is believable. Beret is especial. Beret is lyric. Marianna is nilpotent. Marianna is mortifying. Marianna is especial. Almeta is undulatory. Almeta is lyric. Tulley is benevolent. Tulley is lyric. If someone is believable then they are especial. Big people are believable. If someone is benevolent and lyric then they are nilpotent. Tulley is believable.", "logic": "\nBelievable(beret)\nEspecial(beret)\nLyric(beret)\nNilpotent(marianna)\nMortifying(marianna)\nEspecial(marianna)\nUndulatory(almeta)\nLyric(almeta)\nBenevolent(tulley)\nLyric(tulley)\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Especial(x))\nforall x (Nilpotent(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Benevolent(x) and Lyric(x) -> Nilpotent(x))\n\nBelievable(tulley)\n\nBenevolent(tulley) and Lyric(tulley) and forall x (Benevolent(x) and Lyric(x) -> Nilpotent(x)) -> therefore Nilpotent(tulley) Nilpotent(tulley) and forall x (Nilpotent(x) -> Believable(x)) -> therefore Believable(tulley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Alina is undersized. Alina is geothermal. Alina is sundry. Junette is gouty. Junette is erasable. Junette is geothermal. Arnold is aural. Arnold is sundry. Tudor is libellous. Tudor is sundry. If someone is undersized then they are geothermal. Big people are undersized. If someone is libellous and sundry then they are gouty. Tudor is not undersized.", "logic": "\nUndersized(alina)\nGeothermal(alina)\nSundry(alina)\nGouty(junette)\nErasable(junette)\nGeothermal(junette)\nAural(arnold)\nSundry(arnold)\nLibellous(tudor)\nSundry(tudor)\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Geothermal(x))\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Libellous(x) and Sundry(x) -> Gouty(x))\n\nnot Undersized(tudor)\n\nLibellous(tudor) and Sundry(tudor) and forall x (Libellous(x) and Sundry(x) -> Gouty(x)) -> therefore Gouty(tudor) Gouty(tudor) and forall x (Gouty(x) -> Undersized(x)) -> therefore Undersized(tudor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Kelvin is stellar. Kelvin is pyramidic. Kelvin is nonmusical. Dasie is debonaire. Dasie is infrared. Dasie is pyramidic. Timmie is unrifled. Timmie is nonmusical. Helge is grasping. Helge is nonmusical. If someone is stellar then they are pyramidic. Big people are stellar. If someone is grasping and nonmusical then they are debonaire. Helge is pyramidic.", "logic": "\nStellar(kelvin)\nPyramidic(kelvin)\nNonmusical(kelvin)\nDebonaire(dasie)\nInfrared(dasie)\nPyramidic(dasie)\nUnrifled(timmie)\nNonmusical(timmie)\nGrasping(helge)\nNonmusical(helge)\nforall x (Stellar(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nforall x (Debonaire(x) -> Stellar(x))\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Nonmusical(x) -> Debonaire(x))\n\nPyramidic(helge)\n\nGrasping(helge) and Nonmusical(helge) and forall x (Grasping(x) and Nonmusical(x) -> Debonaire(x)) -> therefore Debonaire(helge) Debonaire(helge) and forall x (Debonaire(x) -> Stellar(x)) -> therefore Stellar(helge) Stellar(helge) and forall x (Stellar(x) -> Pyramidic(x)) -> therefore Pyramidic(helge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Agatha is neuronic. Agatha is fabian. Agatha is protestant. Marchelle is wilful. Marchelle is curvey. Marchelle is fabian. Arvin is moral. Arvin is protestant. Jenda is numidian. Jenda is protestant. If someone is neuronic then they are fabian. Big people are neuronic. If someone is numidian and protestant then they are wilful. Jenda is not fabian.", "logic": "\nNeuronic(agatha)\nFabian(agatha)\nProtestant(agatha)\nWilful(marchelle)\nCurvey(marchelle)\nFabian(marchelle)\nMoral(arvin)\nProtestant(arvin)\nNumidian(jenda)\nProtestant(jenda)\nforall x (Neuronic(x) -> Fabian(x))\nforall x (Wilful(x) -> Neuronic(x))\nforall x (Numidian(x) and Protestant(x) -> Wilful(x))\n\nnot Fabian(jenda)\n\nNumidian(jenda) and Protestant(jenda) and forall x (Numidian(x) and Protestant(x) -> Wilful(x)) -> therefore Wilful(jenda) Wilful(jenda) and forall x (Wilful(x) -> Neuronic(x)) -> therefore Neuronic(jenda) Neuronic(jenda) and forall x (Neuronic(x) -> Fabian(x)) -> therefore Fabian(jenda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Blinni is sweltry. Blinni is wise. Blinni is ruttish. Bab is placeable. Bab is gleaming. Bab is wise. Morgan is scaly. Morgan is ruttish. Helaine is bisulcate. Helaine is ruttish. If someone is sweltry then they are wise. Big people are sweltry. If someone is bisulcate and ruttish then they are placeable. Morgan is not sweltry.", "logic": "\nSweltry(blinni)\nWise(blinni)\nRuttish(blinni)\nPlaceable(bab)\nGleaming(bab)\nWise(bab)\nScaly(morgan)\nRuttish(morgan)\nBisulcate(helaine)\nRuttish(helaine)\nforall x (Sweltry(x) -> Wise(x))\nforall x (Placeable(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nforall x (Bisulcate(x) and Ruttish(x) -> Placeable(x))\n\nnot Sweltry(morgan)\n\nforall x (Placeable(x) -> Sweltry(x)) <- forall x (Bisulcate(x) and Ruttish(x) -> Placeable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Elfrieda is germinal. Elfrieda is untucked. Elfrieda is educated. Laird is shadowy. Laird is zymoid. Laird is untucked. Ritchie is standing. Ritchie is educated. Dody is unwritten. Dody is educated. If someone is germinal then they are untucked. Big people are germinal. If someone is unwritten and educated then they are shadowy. Elfrieda is shadowy.", "logic": "\nGerminal(elfrieda)\nUntucked(elfrieda)\nEducated(elfrieda)\nShadowy(laird)\nZymoid(laird)\nUntucked(laird)\nStanding(ritchie)\nEducated(ritchie)\nUnwritten(dody)\nEducated(dody)\nforall x (Germinal(x) -> Untucked(x))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Germinal(x))\nforall x (Unwritten(x) and Educated(x) -> Shadowy(x))\n\nShadowy(elfrieda)\n\nforall x (Unwritten(x) and Educated(x) -> Shadowy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Ayn is impeccable. Ayn is localized. Ayn is shouted. Ivie is saliferous. Ivie is windward. Ivie is localized. Tiff is disclosed. Tiff is shouted. Tiff is signed. Tiff is shouted. If someone is impeccable then they are localized. Big people are impeccable. If someone is signed and shouted then they are saliferous. Tiff is not localized.", "logic": "\nImpeccable(ayn)\nLocalized(ayn)\nShouted(ayn)\nSaliferous(ivie)\nWindward(ivie)\nLocalized(ivie)\nDisclosed(tiff)\nShouted(tiff)\nSigned(tiff)\nShouted(tiff)\nforall x (Impeccable(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Signed(x) and Shouted(x) -> Saliferous(x))\n\nnot Localized(tiff)\n\nforall x (Impeccable(x) -> Localized(x)) <- forall x (Saliferous(x) -> Impeccable(x)) <- forall x (Signed(x) and Shouted(x) -> Saliferous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Winnah is unwounded. Winnah is following. Winnah is sprightly. Brady is admissible. Brady is formless. Brady is following. Lin is pustulate. Lin is sprightly. Albatros is basaltic. Albatros is sprightly. If someone is unwounded then they are following. Big people are unwounded. If someone is basaltic and sprightly then they are admissible. Lin is admissible.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(winnah)\nFollowing(winnah)\nSprightly(winnah)\nAdmissible(brady)\nFormless(brady)\nFollowing(brady)\nPustulate(lin)\nSprightly(lin)\nBasaltic(albatros)\nSprightly(albatros)\nforall x (Unwounded(x) -> Following(x))\nforall x (Admissible(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Sprightly(x) -> Admissible(x))\n\nAdmissible(lin)\n\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Sprightly(x) -> Admissible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Sting is apogamous. Sting is imitation. Sting is azoic. Flore is schismatic. Flore is backhand. Flore is imitation. Almire is smarmy. Almire is azoic. Nariko is swampy. Nariko is azoic. If someone is apogamous then they are imitation. Big people are apogamous. If someone is swampy and azoic then they are schismatic. Sting is not backhand.", "logic": "\nApogamous(sting)\nImitation(sting)\nAzoic(sting)\nSchismatic(flore)\nBackhand(flore)\nImitation(flore)\nSmarmy(almire)\nAzoic(almire)\nSwampy(nariko)\nAzoic(nariko)\nforall x (Apogamous(x) -> Imitation(x))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) -> Apogamous(x))\nforall x (Swampy(x) and Azoic(x) -> Schismatic(x))\n\nnot Backhand(sting)\n\nnot Backhand(sting) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Tracee is reanimated. Tracee is rustic. Tracee is dingy. Stearne is robotlike. Stearne is anorectic. Stearne is rustic. Catarina is aboral. Catarina is dingy. Graham is pleasant. Graham is dingy. If someone is reanimated then they are rustic. Big people are reanimated. If someone is pleasant and dingy then they are robotlike. Tracee is aboral.", "logic": "\nReanimated(tracee)\nRustic(tracee)\nDingy(tracee)\nRobotlike(stearne)\nAnorectic(stearne)\nRustic(stearne)\nAboral(catarina)\nDingy(catarina)\nPleasant(graham)\nDingy(graham)\nforall x (Reanimated(x) -> Rustic(x))\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Pleasant(x) and Dingy(x) -> Robotlike(x))\n\nAboral(tracee)\n\nAboral(tracee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Deny is tranquil. Deny is axile. Deny is lupine. Evania is inured. Evania is unheeded. Evania is axile. Ginelle is confirmed. Ginelle is lupine. Ismail is fleeting. Ismail is lupine. If someone is tranquil then they are axile. Big people are tranquil. If someone is fleeting and lupine then they are inured. Evania is not confirmed.", "logic": "\nTranquil(deny)\nAxile(deny)\nLupine(deny)\nInured(evania)\nUnheeded(evania)\nAxile(evania)\nConfirmed(ginelle)\nLupine(ginelle)\nFleeting(ismail)\nLupine(ismail)\nforall x (Tranquil(x) -> Axile(x))\nforall x (Inured(x) -> Tranquil(x))\nforall x (Fleeting(x) and Lupine(x) -> Inured(x))\n\nnot Confirmed(evania)\n\nnot Confirmed(evania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "Easton is reverting. Easton is recoilless. Easton is afrikaans. Nora is manchurian. Nora is amorphous. Nora is recoilless. Alvinia is unlocated. Alvinia is afrikaans. Sande is desegrated. Sande is afrikaans. If someone is reverting then they are recoilless. Big people are reverting. If someone is desegrated and afrikaans then they are manchurian. Alvinia is desegrated.", "logic": "\nReverting(easton)\nRecoilless(easton)\nAfrikaans(easton)\nManchurian(nora)\nAmorphous(nora)\nRecoilless(nora)\nUnlocated(alvinia)\nAfrikaans(alvinia)\nDesegrated(sande)\nAfrikaans(sande)\nforall x (Reverting(x) -> Recoilless(x))\nforall x (Manchurian(x) -> Reverting(x))\nforall x (Desegrated(x) and Afrikaans(x) -> Manchurian(x))\n\nDesegrated(alvinia)\n\nDesegrated(alvinia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1120"} {"premises": "The kirstin reward the ruthie. The ruthie julienne the kirstin. If the ruthie is jittering and the ruthie reward the kirstin then the kirstin is jittering. If someone is jittering and they eat the ruthie then they are tonguelike. If someone julienne the kirstin then the kirstin julienne the ruthie. If the ruthie reward the kirstin and the ruthie is dividable then the kirstin is cystic. If someone reward the ruthie and they see the ruthie then the ruthie is jittering. If someone reward the ruthie then the ruthie reward the kirstin. If someone julienne the kirstin and the kirstin does not like the ruthie then the kirstin is dividable. If someone is dividable and they do not eat the kirstin then they like the kirstin. The ruthie julienne the kirstin.", "logic": "\nReward(kirstin, ruthie)\nJulienne(ruthie, kirstin)\nJittering(ruthie) and Reward(ruthie, kirstin) -> Jittering(kirstin)\nforall x (Jittering(x) and Reward(x, ruthie) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Julienne(x, kirstin) -> Julienne(kirstin, ruthie))\nReward(ruthie, kirstin) and Dividable(ruthie) -> Cystic(kirstin)\nforall x (Reward(x, ruthie) and Julienne(x, ruthie) -> Jittering(ruthie))\nforall x (Reward(x, ruthie) -> Reward(ruthie, kirstin))\nforall x (Julienne(x, kirstin) and not Immunise(kirstin, ruthie) -> Dividable(kirstin))\nforall x (Dividable(x) and not Reward(x, kirstin) -> Immunise(x, kirstin))\n\nJulienne(ruthie, kirstin)\n\ntherefore Julienne(ruthie, kirstin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The fionna offset the davide. The davide refract the fionna. If the davide is unaccepted and the davide offset the fionna then the fionna is unaccepted. If someone is unaccepted and they eat the davide then they are alienated. If someone refract the fionna then the fionna refract the davide. If the davide offset the fionna and the davide is dissuasive then the fionna is jutting. If someone offset the davide and they see the davide then the davide is unaccepted. If someone offset the davide then the davide offset the fionna. If someone refract the fionna and the fionna does not like the davide then the fionna is dissuasive. If someone is dissuasive and they do not eat the fionna then they like the fionna. The davide does not see the fionna.", "logic": "\nOffset(fionna, davide)\nRefract(davide, fionna)\nUnaccepted(davide) and Offset(davide, fionna) -> Unaccepted(fionna)\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) and Offset(x, davide) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Refract(x, fionna) -> Refract(fionna, davide))\nOffset(davide, fionna) and Dissuasive(davide) -> Jutting(fionna)\nforall x (Offset(x, davide) and Refract(x, davide) -> Unaccepted(davide))\nforall x (Offset(x, davide) -> Offset(davide, fionna))\nforall x (Refract(x, fionna) and not Psalm(fionna, davide) -> Dissuasive(fionna))\nforall x (Dissuasive(x) and not Offset(x, fionna) -> Psalm(x, fionna))\n\nnot Refract(davide, fionna)\n\ntherefore Refract(davide, fionna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The anjela funk the stewart. The stewart bottom the anjela. If the stewart is exogenic and the stewart funk the anjela then the anjela is exogenic. If someone is exogenic and they eat the stewart then they are ivied. If someone bottom the anjela then the anjela bottom the stewart. If the stewart funk the anjela and the stewart is shitless then the anjela is winding. If someone funk the stewart and they see the stewart then the stewart is exogenic. If someone funk the stewart then the stewart funk the anjela. If someone bottom the anjela and the anjela does not like the stewart then the anjela is shitless. If someone is shitless and they do not eat the anjela then they like the anjela. The anjela bottom the stewart.", "logic": "\nFunk(anjela, stewart)\nBottom(stewart, anjela)\nExogenic(stewart) and Funk(stewart, anjela) -> Exogenic(anjela)\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Funk(x, stewart) -> Ivied(x))\nforall x (Bottom(x, anjela) -> Bottom(anjela, stewart))\nFunk(stewart, anjela) and Shitless(stewart) -> Winding(anjela)\nforall x (Funk(x, stewart) and Bottom(x, stewart) -> Exogenic(stewart))\nforall x (Funk(x, stewart) -> Funk(stewart, anjela))\nforall x (Bottom(x, anjela) and not Nullify(anjela, stewart) -> Shitless(anjela))\nforall x (Shitless(x) and not Funk(x, anjela) -> Nullify(x, anjela))\n\nBottom(anjela, stewart)\n\nBottom(stewart, anjela) and forall x (Bottom(x, anjela) -> Bottom(anjela, stewart)) -> therefore Bottom(anjela, stewart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The dru dropkick the lyndsay. The lyndsay forfeit the dru. If the lyndsay is chapped and the lyndsay dropkick the dru then the dru is chapped. If someone is chapped and they eat the lyndsay then they are lxxxiii. If someone forfeit the dru then the dru forfeit the lyndsay. If the lyndsay dropkick the dru and the lyndsay is carbuncled then the dru is unmolested. If someone dropkick the lyndsay and they see the lyndsay then the lyndsay is chapped. If someone dropkick the lyndsay then the lyndsay dropkick the dru. If someone forfeit the dru and the dru does not like the lyndsay then the dru is carbuncled. If someone is carbuncled and they do not eat the dru then they like the dru. The dru does not see the lyndsay.", "logic": "\nDropkick(dru, lyndsay)\nForfeit(lyndsay, dru)\nChapped(lyndsay) and Dropkick(lyndsay, dru) -> Chapped(dru)\nforall x (Chapped(x) and Dropkick(x, lyndsay) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x, dru) -> Forfeit(dru, lyndsay))\nDropkick(lyndsay, dru) and Carbuncled(lyndsay) -> Unmolested(dru)\nforall x (Dropkick(x, lyndsay) and Forfeit(x, lyndsay) -> Chapped(lyndsay))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, lyndsay) -> Dropkick(lyndsay, dru))\nforall x (Forfeit(x, dru) and not Bight(dru, lyndsay) -> Carbuncled(dru))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) and not Dropkick(x, dru) -> Bight(x, dru))\n\nnot Forfeit(dru, lyndsay)\n\nForfeit(lyndsay, dru) and forall x (Forfeit(x, dru) -> Forfeit(dru, lyndsay)) -> therefore Forfeit(dru, lyndsay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The lazar outcry the aristotle. The aristotle shill the lazar. If the aristotle is arminian and the aristotle outcry the lazar then the lazar is arminian. If someone is arminian and they eat the aristotle then they are vermillion. If someone shill the lazar then the lazar shill the aristotle. If the aristotle outcry the lazar and the aristotle is antiquated then the lazar is unbecoming. If someone outcry the aristotle and they see the aristotle then the aristotle is arminian. If someone outcry the aristotle then the aristotle outcry the lazar. If someone shill the lazar and the lazar does not like the aristotle then the lazar is antiquated. If someone is antiquated and they do not eat the lazar then they like the lazar. The aristotle is arminian.", "logic": "\nOutcry(lazar, aristotle)\nShill(aristotle, lazar)\nArminian(aristotle) and Outcry(aristotle, lazar) -> Arminian(lazar)\nforall x (Arminian(x) and Outcry(x, aristotle) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Shill(x, lazar) -> Shill(lazar, aristotle))\nOutcry(aristotle, lazar) and Antiquated(aristotle) -> Unbecoming(lazar)\nforall x (Outcry(x, aristotle) and Shill(x, aristotle) -> Arminian(aristotle))\nforall x (Outcry(x, aristotle) -> Outcry(aristotle, lazar))\nforall x (Shill(x, lazar) and not Irritate(lazar, aristotle) -> Antiquated(lazar))\nforall x (Antiquated(x) and not Outcry(x, lazar) -> Irritate(x, lazar))\n\nArminian(aristotle)\n\nShill(aristotle, lazar) and forall x (Shill(x, lazar) -> Shill(lazar, aristotle)) -> therefore Shill(lazar, aristotle) Outcry(lazar, aristotle) and Shill(lazar, aristotle) and forall x (Outcry(x, aristotle) and Shill(x, aristotle) -> Arminian(aristotle)) -> therefore Arminian(aristotle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The ulrica channelise the chrisy. The chrisy lunge the ulrica. If the chrisy is snowy and the chrisy channelise the ulrica then the ulrica is snowy. If someone is snowy and they eat the chrisy then they are erring. If someone lunge the ulrica then the ulrica lunge the chrisy. If the chrisy channelise the ulrica and the chrisy is ulcerative then the ulrica is prostatic. If someone channelise the chrisy and they see the chrisy then the chrisy is snowy. If someone channelise the chrisy then the chrisy channelise the ulrica. If someone lunge the ulrica and the ulrica does not like the chrisy then the ulrica is ulcerative. If someone is ulcerative and they do not eat the ulrica then they like the ulrica. The chrisy is not snowy.", "logic": "\nChannelise(ulrica, chrisy)\nLunge(chrisy, ulrica)\nSnowy(chrisy) and Channelise(chrisy, ulrica) -> Snowy(ulrica)\nforall x (Snowy(x) and Channelise(x, chrisy) -> Erring(x))\nforall x (Lunge(x, ulrica) -> Lunge(ulrica, chrisy))\nChannelise(chrisy, ulrica) and Ulcerative(chrisy) -> Prostatic(ulrica)\nforall x (Channelise(x, chrisy) and Lunge(x, chrisy) -> Snowy(chrisy))\nforall x (Channelise(x, chrisy) -> Channelise(chrisy, ulrica))\nforall x (Lunge(x, ulrica) and not Humor(ulrica, chrisy) -> Ulcerative(ulrica))\nforall x (Ulcerative(x) and not Channelise(x, ulrica) -> Humor(x, ulrica))\n\nnot Snowy(chrisy)\n\nLunge(chrisy, ulrica) and forall x (Lunge(x, ulrica) -> Lunge(ulrica, chrisy)) -> therefore Lunge(ulrica, chrisy) Channelise(ulrica, chrisy) and Lunge(ulrica, chrisy) and forall x (Channelise(x, chrisy) and Lunge(x, chrisy) -> Snowy(chrisy)) -> therefore Snowy(chrisy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The loise trust the shoshie. The shoshie falsify the loise. If the shoshie is untactful and the shoshie trust the loise then the loise is untactful. If someone is untactful and they eat the shoshie then they are pharaonic. If someone falsify the loise then the loise falsify the shoshie. If the shoshie trust the loise and the shoshie is endless then the loise is burnable. If someone trust the shoshie and they see the shoshie then the shoshie is untactful. If someone trust the shoshie then the shoshie trust the loise. If someone falsify the loise and the loise does not like the shoshie then the loise is endless. If someone is endless and they do not eat the loise then they like the loise. The loise is untactful.", "logic": "\nTrust(loise, shoshie)\nFalsify(shoshie, loise)\nUntactful(shoshie) and Trust(shoshie, loise) -> Untactful(loise)\nforall x (Untactful(x) and Trust(x, shoshie) -> Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Falsify(x, loise) -> Falsify(loise, shoshie))\nTrust(shoshie, loise) and Endless(shoshie) -> Burnable(loise)\nforall x (Trust(x, shoshie) and Falsify(x, shoshie) -> Untactful(shoshie))\nforall x (Trust(x, shoshie) -> Trust(shoshie, loise))\nforall x (Falsify(x, loise) and not Jelly(loise, shoshie) -> Endless(loise))\nforall x (Endless(x) and not Trust(x, loise) -> Jelly(x, loise))\n\nUntactful(loise)\n\nFalsify(shoshie, loise) and forall x (Falsify(x, loise) -> Falsify(loise, shoshie)) -> therefore Falsify(loise, shoshie) Trust(loise, shoshie) and Falsify(loise, shoshie) and forall x (Trust(x, shoshie) and Falsify(x, shoshie) -> Untactful(shoshie)) -> therefore Untactful(shoshie) Trust(loise, shoshie) and forall x (Trust(x, shoshie) -> Trust(shoshie, loise)) -> therefore Trust(shoshie, loise) Untactful(shoshie) and Trust(shoshie, loise) and Untactful(shoshie) and Trust(shoshie, loise) -> Untactful(loise) -> therefore Untactful(loise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The evelyn peroxide the yancy. The yancy condense the evelyn. If the yancy is eery and the yancy peroxide the evelyn then the evelyn is eery. If someone is eery and they eat the yancy then they are categorial. If someone condense the evelyn then the evelyn condense the yancy. If the yancy peroxide the evelyn and the yancy is blazing then the evelyn is tuppeny. If someone peroxide the yancy and they see the yancy then the yancy is eery. If someone peroxide the yancy then the yancy peroxide the evelyn. If someone condense the evelyn and the evelyn does not like the yancy then the evelyn is blazing. If someone is blazing and they do not eat the evelyn then they like the evelyn. The evelyn is not eery.", "logic": "\nPeroxide(evelyn, yancy)\nCondense(yancy, evelyn)\nEery(yancy) and Peroxide(yancy, evelyn) -> Eery(evelyn)\nforall x (Eery(x) and Peroxide(x, yancy) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Condense(x, evelyn) -> Condense(evelyn, yancy))\nPeroxide(yancy, evelyn) and Blazing(yancy) -> Tuppeny(evelyn)\nforall x (Peroxide(x, yancy) and Condense(x, yancy) -> Eery(yancy))\nforall x (Peroxide(x, yancy) -> Peroxide(yancy, evelyn))\nforall x (Condense(x, evelyn) and not Bedevil(evelyn, yancy) -> Blazing(evelyn))\nforall x (Blazing(x) and not Peroxide(x, evelyn) -> Bedevil(x, evelyn))\n\nnot Eery(evelyn)\n\nCondense(yancy, evelyn) and forall x (Condense(x, evelyn) -> Condense(evelyn, yancy)) -> therefore Condense(evelyn, yancy) Peroxide(evelyn, yancy) and Condense(evelyn, yancy) and forall x (Peroxide(x, yancy) and Condense(x, yancy) -> Eery(yancy)) -> therefore Eery(yancy) Peroxide(evelyn, yancy) and forall x (Peroxide(x, yancy) -> Peroxide(yancy, evelyn)) -> therefore Peroxide(yancy, evelyn) Eery(yancy) and Peroxide(yancy, evelyn) and Eery(yancy) and Peroxide(yancy, evelyn) -> Eery(evelyn) -> therefore Eery(evelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The harvey blackguard the quinton. The quinton decollate the harvey. If the quinton is pigheaded and the quinton blackguard the harvey then the harvey is pigheaded. If someone is pigheaded and they eat the quinton then they are tardive. If someone decollate the harvey then the harvey decollate the quinton. If the quinton blackguard the harvey and the quinton is dipylon then the harvey is ferric. If someone blackguard the quinton and they see the quinton then the quinton is pigheaded. If someone blackguard the quinton then the quinton blackguard the harvey. If someone decollate the harvey and the harvey does not like the quinton then the harvey is dipylon. If someone is dipylon and they do not eat the harvey then they like the harvey. The harvey is not ferric.", "logic": "\nBlackguard(harvey, quinton)\nDecollate(quinton, harvey)\nPigheaded(quinton) and Blackguard(quinton, harvey) -> Pigheaded(harvey)\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) and Blackguard(x, quinton) -> Tardive(x))\nforall x (Decollate(x, harvey) -> Decollate(harvey, quinton))\nBlackguard(quinton, harvey) and Dipylon(quinton) -> Ferric(harvey)\nforall x (Blackguard(x, quinton) and Decollate(x, quinton) -> Pigheaded(quinton))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, quinton) -> Blackguard(quinton, harvey))\nforall x (Decollate(x, harvey) and not React(harvey, quinton) -> Dipylon(harvey))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and not Blackguard(x, harvey) -> React(x, harvey))\n\nnot Ferric(harvey)\n\nBlackguard(quinton, harvey) and Dipylon(quinton) -> Ferric(harvey) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The samaria demur the barbey. The barbey moon the samaria. If the barbey is azure and the barbey demur the samaria then the samaria is azure. If someone is azure and they eat the barbey then they are bichrome. If someone moon the samaria then the samaria moon the barbey. If the barbey demur the samaria and the barbey is twilit then the samaria is carbonylic. If someone demur the barbey and they see the barbey then the barbey is azure. If someone demur the barbey then the barbey demur the samaria. If someone moon the samaria and the samaria does not like the barbey then the samaria is twilit. If someone is twilit and they do not eat the samaria then they like the samaria. The barbey jellify the samaria.", "logic": "\nDemur(samaria, barbey)\nMoon(barbey, samaria)\nAzure(barbey) and Demur(barbey, samaria) -> Azure(samaria)\nforall x (Azure(x) and Demur(x, barbey) -> Bichrome(x))\nforall x (Moon(x, samaria) -> Moon(samaria, barbey))\nDemur(barbey, samaria) and Twilit(barbey) -> Carbonylic(samaria)\nforall x (Demur(x, barbey) and Moon(x, barbey) -> Azure(barbey))\nforall x (Demur(x, barbey) -> Demur(barbey, samaria))\nforall x (Moon(x, samaria) and not Jellify(samaria, barbey) -> Twilit(samaria))\nforall x (Twilit(x) and not Demur(x, samaria) -> Jellify(x, samaria))\n\nJellify(barbey, samaria)\n\nforall x (Twilit(x) and not Demur(x, samaria) -> Jellify(x, samaria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The sheff halt the elsie. The elsie clangor the sheff. If the elsie is intramural and the elsie halt the sheff then the sheff is intramural. If someone is intramural and they eat the elsie then they are flexuous. If someone clangor the sheff then the sheff clangor the elsie. If the elsie halt the sheff and the elsie is redbrick then the sheff is numerical. If someone halt the elsie and they see the elsie then the elsie is intramural. If someone halt the elsie then the elsie halt the sheff. If someone clangor the sheff and the sheff does not like the elsie then the sheff is redbrick. If someone is redbrick and they do not eat the sheff then they like the sheff. The elsie is not flexuous.", "logic": "\nHalt(sheff, elsie)\nClangor(elsie, sheff)\nIntramural(elsie) and Halt(elsie, sheff) -> Intramural(sheff)\nforall x (Intramural(x) and Halt(x, elsie) -> Flexuous(x))\nforall x (Clangor(x, sheff) -> Clangor(sheff, elsie))\nHalt(elsie, sheff) and Redbrick(elsie) -> Numerical(sheff)\nforall x (Halt(x, elsie) and Clangor(x, elsie) -> Intramural(elsie))\nforall x (Halt(x, elsie) -> Halt(elsie, sheff))\nforall x (Clangor(x, sheff) and not Overwhelm(sheff, elsie) -> Redbrick(sheff))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and not Halt(x, sheff) -> Overwhelm(x, sheff))\n\nnot Flexuous(elsie)\n\nforall x (Intramural(x) and Halt(x, elsie) -> Flexuous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The libby christen the chaunce. The chaunce disqualify the libby. If the chaunce is impacted and the chaunce christen the libby then the libby is impacted. If someone is impacted and they eat the chaunce then they are wasteful. If someone disqualify the libby then the libby disqualify the chaunce. If the chaunce christen the libby and the chaunce is steadying then the libby is referable. If someone christen the chaunce and they see the chaunce then the chaunce is impacted. If someone christen the chaunce then the chaunce christen the libby. If someone disqualify the libby and the libby does not like the chaunce then the libby is steadying. If someone is steadying and they do not eat the libby then they like the libby. The libby dissolve the libby.", "logic": "\nChristen(libby, chaunce)\nDisqualify(chaunce, libby)\nImpacted(chaunce) and Christen(chaunce, libby) -> Impacted(libby)\nforall x (Impacted(x) and Christen(x, chaunce) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, libby) -> Disqualify(libby, chaunce))\nChristen(chaunce, libby) and Steadying(chaunce) -> Referable(libby)\nforall x (Christen(x, chaunce) and Disqualify(x, chaunce) -> Impacted(chaunce))\nforall x (Christen(x, chaunce) -> Christen(chaunce, libby))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, libby) and not Dissolve(libby, chaunce) -> Steadying(libby))\nforall x (Steadying(x) and not Christen(x, libby) -> Dissolve(x, libby))\n\nDissolve(libby, libby)\n\nforall x (Steadying(x) and not Christen(x, libby) -> Dissolve(x, libby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The gregorio regenerate the benni. The benni face the gregorio. If the benni is disgusting and the benni regenerate the gregorio then the gregorio is disgusting. If someone is disgusting and they eat the benni then they are unpassable. If someone face the gregorio then the gregorio face the benni. If the benni regenerate the gregorio and the benni is grisly then the gregorio is unsymbolic. If someone regenerate the benni and they see the benni then the benni is disgusting. If someone regenerate the benni then the benni regenerate the gregorio. If someone face the gregorio and the gregorio does not like the benni then the gregorio is grisly. If someone is grisly and they do not eat the gregorio then they like the gregorio. The benni does not see the benni.", "logic": "\nRegenerate(gregorio, benni)\nFace(benni, gregorio)\nDisgusting(benni) and Regenerate(benni, gregorio) -> Disgusting(gregorio)\nforall x (Disgusting(x) and Regenerate(x, benni) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Face(x, gregorio) -> Face(gregorio, benni))\nRegenerate(benni, gregorio) and Grisly(benni) -> Unsymbolic(gregorio)\nforall x (Regenerate(x, benni) and Face(x, benni) -> Disgusting(benni))\nforall x (Regenerate(x, benni) -> Regenerate(benni, gregorio))\nforall x (Face(x, gregorio) and not Restart(gregorio, benni) -> Grisly(gregorio))\nforall x (Grisly(x) and not Regenerate(x, gregorio) -> Restart(x, gregorio))\n\nnot Face(benni, benni)\n\nnot Face(benni, benni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The ender caress the merrie. The merrie tope the ender. If the merrie is megascopic and the merrie caress the ender then the ender is megascopic. If someone is megascopic and they eat the merrie then they are effulgent. If someone tope the ender then the ender tope the merrie. If the merrie caress the ender and the merrie is contrary then the ender is fuggy. If someone caress the merrie and they see the merrie then the merrie is megascopic. If someone caress the merrie then the merrie caress the ender. If someone tope the ender and the ender does not like the merrie then the ender is contrary. If someone is contrary and they do not eat the ender then they like the ender. The merrie is fuggy.", "logic": "\nCaress(ender, merrie)\nTope(merrie, ender)\nMegascopic(merrie) and Caress(merrie, ender) -> Megascopic(ender)\nforall x (Megascopic(x) and Caress(x, merrie) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Tope(x, ender) -> Tope(ender, merrie))\nCaress(merrie, ender) and Contrary(merrie) -> Fuggy(ender)\nforall x (Caress(x, merrie) and Tope(x, merrie) -> Megascopic(merrie))\nforall x (Caress(x, merrie) -> Caress(merrie, ender))\nforall x (Tope(x, ender) and not Solicit(ender, merrie) -> Contrary(ender))\nforall x (Contrary(x) and not Caress(x, ender) -> Solicit(x, ender))\n\nFuggy(merrie)\n\nFuggy(merrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The roxanne valuate the ali. The ali whiteout the roxanne. If the ali is asinine and the ali valuate the roxanne then the roxanne is asinine. If someone is asinine and they eat the ali then they are completing. If someone whiteout the roxanne then the roxanne whiteout the ali. If the ali valuate the roxanne and the ali is antepartum then the roxanne is powdery. If someone valuate the ali and they see the ali then the ali is asinine. If someone valuate the ali then the ali valuate the roxanne. If someone whiteout the roxanne and the roxanne does not like the ali then the roxanne is antepartum. If someone is antepartum and they do not eat the roxanne then they like the roxanne. The roxanne does not see the roxanne.", "logic": "\nValuate(roxanne, ali)\nWhiteout(ali, roxanne)\nAsinine(ali) and Valuate(ali, roxanne) -> Asinine(roxanne)\nforall x (Asinine(x) and Valuate(x, ali) -> Completing(x))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, roxanne) -> Whiteout(roxanne, ali))\nValuate(ali, roxanne) and Antepartum(ali) -> Powdery(roxanne)\nforall x (Valuate(x, ali) and Whiteout(x, ali) -> Asinine(ali))\nforall x (Valuate(x, ali) -> Valuate(ali, roxanne))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, roxanne) and not Astrogate(roxanne, ali) -> Antepartum(roxanne))\nforall x (Antepartum(x) and not Valuate(x, roxanne) -> Astrogate(x, roxanne))\n\nnot Whiteout(roxanne, roxanne)\n\nnot Whiteout(roxanne, roxanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "The juliana republish the patricia. The patricia task the juliana. If the patricia is nontaxable and the patricia republish the juliana then the juliana is nontaxable. If someone is nontaxable and they eat the patricia then they are esophageal. If someone task the juliana then the juliana task the patricia. If the patricia republish the juliana and the patricia is nonslip then the juliana is offstage. If someone republish the patricia and they see the patricia then the patricia is nontaxable. If someone republish the patricia then the patricia republish the juliana. If someone task the juliana and the juliana does not like the patricia then the juliana is nonslip. If someone is nonslip and they do not eat the juliana then they like the juliana. The juliana republish the juliana.", "logic": "\nRepublish(juliana, patricia)\nTask(patricia, juliana)\nNontaxable(patricia) and Republish(patricia, juliana) -> Nontaxable(juliana)\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and Republish(x, patricia) -> Esophageal(x))\nforall x (Task(x, juliana) -> Task(juliana, patricia))\nRepublish(patricia, juliana) and Nonslip(patricia) -> Offstage(juliana)\nforall x (Republish(x, patricia) and Task(x, patricia) -> Nontaxable(patricia))\nforall x (Republish(x, patricia) -> Republish(patricia, juliana))\nforall x (Task(x, juliana) and not Primp(juliana, patricia) -> Nonslip(juliana))\nforall x (Nonslip(x) and not Republish(x, juliana) -> Primp(x, juliana))\n\nRepublish(juliana, juliana)\n\nRepublish(juliana, juliana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1587"} {"premises": "Hewe is allantoid. Hewe is nutty. Hewe is geodesic. Red, xxvi things are geodesic. If something is geodesic and allantoid then it is xxvi. Red, xxvi things are tragical. Hewe is nutty.", "logic": "\nAllantoid(hewe)\nNutty(hewe)\nGeodesic(hewe)\nforall x (Allantoid(x) and Xxvi(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) and Allantoid(x) -> Xxvi(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) and Xxvi(x) -> Tragical(x))\n\nNutty(hewe)\n\ntherefore Nutty(hewe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Oliy is salverform. Oliy is spangly. Oliy is iterative. Red, brownish things are iterative. If something is iterative and salverform then it is brownish. Red, brownish things are morphemic. Oliy is not spangly.", "logic": "\nSalverform(oliy)\nSpangly(oliy)\nIterative(oliy)\nforall x (Salverform(x) and Brownish(x) -> Iterative(x))\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Salverform(x) -> Brownish(x))\nforall x (Salverform(x) and Brownish(x) -> Morphemic(x))\n\nnot Spangly(oliy)\n\ntherefore Spangly(oliy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Udall is saving. Udall is stewed. Udall is magnified. Red, heedless things are magnified. If something is magnified and saving then it is heedless. Red, heedless things are gimcrack. Udall is heedless.", "logic": "\nSaving(udall)\nStewed(udall)\nMagnified(udall)\nforall x (Saving(x) and Heedless(x) -> Magnified(x))\nforall x (Magnified(x) and Saving(x) -> Heedless(x))\nforall x (Saving(x) and Heedless(x) -> Gimcrack(x))\n\nHeedless(udall)\n\nMagnified(udall) and Saving(udall) and forall x (Magnified(x) and Saving(x) -> Heedless(x)) -> therefore Heedless(udall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Amalita is undeniable. Amalita is contrived. Amalita is felicitous. Red, stigmatic things are felicitous. If something is felicitous and undeniable then it is stigmatic. Red, stigmatic things are abstract. Amalita is not stigmatic.", "logic": "\nUndeniable(amalita)\nContrived(amalita)\nFelicitous(amalita)\nforall x (Undeniable(x) and Stigmatic(x) -> Felicitous(x))\nforall x (Felicitous(x) and Undeniable(x) -> Stigmatic(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) and Stigmatic(x) -> Abstract(x))\n\nnot Stigmatic(amalita)\n\nFelicitous(amalita) and Undeniable(amalita) and forall x (Felicitous(x) and Undeniable(x) -> Stigmatic(x)) -> therefore Stigmatic(amalita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Julita is crabbed. Julita is bigeneric. Julita is coincident. Red, granted things are coincident. If something is coincident and crabbed then it is granted. Red, granted things are dissipated. Julita is dissipated.", "logic": "\nCrabbed(julita)\nBigeneric(julita)\nCoincident(julita)\nforall x (Crabbed(x) and Granted(x) -> Coincident(x))\nforall x (Coincident(x) and Crabbed(x) -> Granted(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) and Granted(x) -> Dissipated(x))\n\nDissipated(julita)\n\nCoincident(julita) and Crabbed(julita) and forall x (Coincident(x) and Crabbed(x) -> Granted(x)) -> therefore Granted(julita) Crabbed(julita) and Granted(julita) and forall x (Crabbed(x) and Granted(x) -> Dissipated(x)) -> therefore Dissipated(julita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Giraldo is bicolored. Giraldo is monestrous. Giraldo is incautious. Red, formalised things are incautious. If something is incautious and bicolored then it is formalised. Red, formalised things are smelling. Giraldo is not smelling.", "logic": "\nBicolored(giraldo)\nMonestrous(giraldo)\nIncautious(giraldo)\nforall x (Bicolored(x) and Formalised(x) -> Incautious(x))\nforall x (Incautious(x) and Bicolored(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Bicolored(x) and Formalised(x) -> Smelling(x))\n\nnot Smelling(giraldo)\n\nIncautious(giraldo) and Bicolored(giraldo) and forall x (Incautious(x) and Bicolored(x) -> Formalised(x)) -> therefore Formalised(giraldo) Bicolored(giraldo) and Formalised(giraldo) and forall x (Bicolored(x) and Formalised(x) -> Smelling(x)) -> therefore Smelling(giraldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Towney is landless. Towney is spastic. Towney is ingrown. Red, squamulose things are ingrown. If something is ingrown and landless then it is squamulose. Red, squamulose things are tribal. Towney is not white.", "logic": "\nLandless(towney)\nSpastic(towney)\nIngrown(towney)\nforall x (Landless(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Ingrown(x))\nforall x (Ingrown(x) and Landless(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Landless(x) and Squamulose(x) -> Tribal(x))\n\nnot White(towney)\n\nnot White(towney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Ainslie is light. Ainslie is adoptive. Ainslie is aortal. Red, inglorious things are aortal. If something is aortal and light then it is inglorious. Red, inglorious things are cosher. Ainslie is big.", "logic": "\nLight(ainslie)\nAdoptive(ainslie)\nAortal(ainslie)\nforall x (Light(x) and Inglorious(x) -> Aortal(x))\nforall x (Aortal(x) and Light(x) -> Inglorious(x))\nforall x (Light(x) and Inglorious(x) -> Cosher(x))\n\nBig(ainslie)\n\nBig(ainslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1360"} {"premises": "Shela is clogged. Shela is dwindling. Shela is asiatic. Shela is measly. Shela is gnarly. Shela is carpetbag. Shela is enchained. Chrysler is clogged. Chrysler is dwindling. Chrysler is measly. Kind, enchained people are gnarly. If Shela is clogged and Shela is dwindling then Shela is carpetbag. White people are asiatic. If someone is asiatic and enchained then they are measly. If someone is measly and asiatic then they are dwindling. Nice people are enchained. If someone is carpetbag and asiatic then they are clogged. All gnarly people are enchained. Chrysler is dwindling.", "logic": "\nClogged(shela)\nDwindling(shela)\nAsiatic(shela)\nMeasly(shela)\nGnarly(shela)\nCarpetbag(shela)\nEnchained(shela)\nClogged(chrysler)\nDwindling(chrysler)\nMeasly(chrysler)\nforall x (Asiatic(x) and Enchained(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nClogged(shela) and Dwindling(shela) -> Carpetbag(shela)\nforall x (Enchained(x) -> Asiatic(x))\nforall x (Asiatic(x) and Enchained(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) and Asiatic(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Carpetbag(x) and Asiatic(x) -> Clogged(x))\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Enchained(x))\n\nDwindling(chrysler)\n\ntherefore Dwindling(chrysler)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Reynolds is subduable. Reynolds is gibelike. Reynolds is separated. Reynolds is smutty. Reynolds is increasing. Reynolds is seedless. Reynolds is fawning. Barnabas is subduable. Barnabas is gibelike. Barnabas is smutty. Kind, fawning people are increasing. If Reynolds is subduable and Reynolds is gibelike then Reynolds is seedless. White people are separated. If someone is separated and fawning then they are smutty. If someone is smutty and separated then they are gibelike. Nice people are fawning. If someone is seedless and separated then they are subduable. All increasing people are fawning. Reynolds is not increasing.", "logic": "\nSubduable(reynolds)\nGibelike(reynolds)\nSeparated(reynolds)\nSmutty(reynolds)\nIncreasing(reynolds)\nSeedless(reynolds)\nFawning(reynolds)\nSubduable(barnabas)\nGibelike(barnabas)\nSmutty(barnabas)\nforall x (Separated(x) and Fawning(x) -> Increasing(x))\nSubduable(reynolds) and Gibelike(reynolds) -> Seedless(reynolds)\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Separated(x))\nforall x (Separated(x) and Fawning(x) -> Smutty(x))\nforall x (Smutty(x) and Separated(x) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Smutty(x) -> Fawning(x))\nforall x (Seedless(x) and Separated(x) -> Subduable(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) -> Fawning(x))\n\nnot Increasing(reynolds)\n\ntherefore Increasing(reynolds)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Delphina is salt. Delphina is phoenician. Delphina is muddied. Delphina is megascopic. Delphina is widowed. Delphina is logistical. Delphina is corking. Joel is salt. Joel is phoenician. Joel is megascopic. Kind, corking people are widowed. If Delphina is salt and Delphina is phoenician then Delphina is logistical. White people are muddied. If someone is muddied and corking then they are megascopic. If someone is megascopic and muddied then they are phoenician. Nice people are corking. If someone is logistical and muddied then they are salt. All widowed people are corking. Joel is corking.", "logic": "\nSalt(delphina)\nPhoenician(delphina)\nMuddied(delphina)\nMegascopic(delphina)\nWidowed(delphina)\nLogistical(delphina)\nCorking(delphina)\nSalt(joel)\nPhoenician(joel)\nMegascopic(joel)\nforall x (Muddied(x) and Corking(x) -> Widowed(x))\nSalt(delphina) and Phoenician(delphina) -> Logistical(delphina)\nforall x (Corking(x) -> Muddied(x))\nforall x (Muddied(x) and Corking(x) -> Megascopic(x))\nforall x (Megascopic(x) and Muddied(x) -> Phoenician(x))\nforall x (Megascopic(x) -> Corking(x))\nforall x (Logistical(x) and Muddied(x) -> Salt(x))\nforall x (Widowed(x) -> Corking(x))\n\nCorking(joel)\n\nMegascopic(joel) and forall x (Megascopic(x) -> Corking(x)) -> therefore Corking(joel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Marven is scentless. Marven is unnotched. Marven is saliferous. Marven is stuporous. Marven is consistent. Marven is waiting. Marven is curled. Godfrey is scentless. Godfrey is unnotched. Godfrey is stuporous. Kind, curled people are consistent. If Marven is scentless and Marven is unnotched then Marven is waiting. White people are saliferous. If someone is saliferous and curled then they are stuporous. If someone is stuporous and saliferous then they are unnotched. Nice people are curled. If someone is waiting and saliferous then they are scentless. All consistent people are curled. Godfrey is not curled.", "logic": "\nScentless(marven)\nUnnotched(marven)\nSaliferous(marven)\nStuporous(marven)\nConsistent(marven)\nWaiting(marven)\nCurled(marven)\nScentless(godfrey)\nUnnotched(godfrey)\nStuporous(godfrey)\nforall x (Saliferous(x) and Curled(x) -> Consistent(x))\nScentless(marven) and Unnotched(marven) -> Waiting(marven)\nforall x (Curled(x) -> Saliferous(x))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) and Curled(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) and Saliferous(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) -> Curled(x))\nforall x (Waiting(x) and Saliferous(x) -> Scentless(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Curled(x))\n\nnot Curled(godfrey)\n\nStuporous(godfrey) and forall x (Stuporous(x) -> Curled(x)) -> therefore Curled(godfrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Rodie is ferial. Rodie is passe. Rodie is scary. Rodie is trashy. Rodie is pilotless. Rodie is sobersided. Rodie is unready. Rasia is ferial. Rasia is passe. Rasia is trashy. Kind, unready people are pilotless. If Rodie is ferial and Rodie is passe then Rodie is sobersided. White people are scary. If someone is scary and unready then they are trashy. If someone is trashy and scary then they are passe. Nice people are unready. If someone is sobersided and scary then they are ferial. All pilotless people are unready. Rasia is scary.", "logic": "\nFerial(rodie)\nPasse(rodie)\nScary(rodie)\nTrashy(rodie)\nPilotless(rodie)\nSobersided(rodie)\nUnready(rodie)\nFerial(rasia)\nPasse(rasia)\nTrashy(rasia)\nforall x (Scary(x) and Unready(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nFerial(rodie) and Passe(rodie) -> Sobersided(rodie)\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Scary(x))\nforall x (Scary(x) and Unready(x) -> Trashy(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) and Scary(x) -> Passe(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) and Scary(x) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Pilotless(x) -> Unready(x))\n\nScary(rasia)\n\nTrashy(rasia) and forall x (Trashy(x) -> Unready(x)) -> therefore Unready(rasia) Unready(rasia) and forall x (Unready(x) -> Scary(x)) -> therefore Scary(rasia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Katalin is ventilated. Katalin is prefatory. Katalin is amethyst. Katalin is clever. Katalin is silenced. Katalin is loving. Katalin is emmetropic. Noelle is ventilated. Noelle is prefatory. Noelle is clever. Kind, emmetropic people are silenced. If Katalin is ventilated and Katalin is prefatory then Katalin is loving. White people are amethyst. If someone is amethyst and emmetropic then they are clever. If someone is clever and amethyst then they are prefatory. Nice people are emmetropic. If someone is loving and amethyst then they are ventilated. All silenced people are emmetropic. Noelle is not amethyst.", "logic": "\nVentilated(katalin)\nPrefatory(katalin)\nAmethyst(katalin)\nClever(katalin)\nSilenced(katalin)\nLoving(katalin)\nEmmetropic(katalin)\nVentilated(noelle)\nPrefatory(noelle)\nClever(noelle)\nforall x (Amethyst(x) and Emmetropic(x) -> Silenced(x))\nVentilated(katalin) and Prefatory(katalin) -> Loving(katalin)\nforall x (Emmetropic(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nforall x (Amethyst(x) and Emmetropic(x) -> Clever(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) -> Emmetropic(x))\nforall x (Loving(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Ventilated(x))\nforall x (Silenced(x) -> Emmetropic(x))\n\nnot Amethyst(noelle)\n\nClever(noelle) and forall x (Clever(x) -> Emmetropic(x)) -> therefore Emmetropic(noelle) Emmetropic(noelle) and forall x (Emmetropic(x) -> Amethyst(x)) -> therefore Amethyst(noelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Hayley is louvered. Hayley is cetaceous. Hayley is seaborne. Hayley is past. Hayley is roving. Hayley is endless. Hayley is sinuate. Pippa is louvered. Pippa is cetaceous. Pippa is past. Kind, sinuate people are roving. If Hayley is louvered and Hayley is cetaceous then Hayley is endless. White people are seaborne. If someone is seaborne and sinuate then they are past. If someone is past and seaborne then they are cetaceous. Nice people are sinuate. If someone is endless and seaborne then they are louvered. All roving people are sinuate. Pippa is roving.", "logic": "\nLouvered(hayley)\nCetaceous(hayley)\nSeaborne(hayley)\nPast(hayley)\nRoving(hayley)\nEndless(hayley)\nSinuate(hayley)\nLouvered(pippa)\nCetaceous(pippa)\nPast(pippa)\nforall x (Seaborne(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Roving(x))\nLouvered(hayley) and Cetaceous(hayley) -> Endless(hayley)\nforall x (Sinuate(x) -> Seaborne(x))\nforall x (Seaborne(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Past(x) and Seaborne(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\nforall x (Past(x) -> Sinuate(x))\nforall x (Endless(x) and Seaborne(x) -> Louvered(x))\nforall x (Roving(x) -> Sinuate(x))\n\nRoving(pippa)\n\nPast(pippa) and forall x (Past(x) -> Sinuate(x)) -> therefore Sinuate(pippa) Sinuate(pippa) and forall x (Sinuate(x) -> Seaborne(x)) -> therefore Seaborne(pippa) Past(pippa) and forall x (Past(x) -> Sinuate(x)) -> therefore Sinuate(pippa) Seaborne(pippa) and Sinuate(pippa) and forall x (Seaborne(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Roving(x)) -> therefore Roving(pippa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "Lucie is bedaubed. Lucie is humid. Lucie is meshugga. Lucie is pathetic. Lucie is unrhymed. Lucie is endocrine. Lucie is honorific. Glenda is bedaubed. Glenda is humid. Glenda is pathetic. Kind, honorific people are unrhymed. If Lucie is bedaubed and Lucie is humid then Lucie is endocrine. White people are meshugga. If someone is meshugga and honorific then they are pathetic. If someone is pathetic and meshugga then they are humid. Nice people are honorific. If someone is endocrine and meshugga then they are bedaubed. All unrhymed people are honorific. Glenda is not unrhymed.", "logic": "\nBedaubed(lucie)\nHumid(lucie)\nMeshugga(lucie)\nPathetic(lucie)\nUnrhymed(lucie)\nEndocrine(lucie)\nHonorific(lucie)\nBedaubed(glenda)\nHumid(glenda)\nPathetic(glenda)\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Honorific(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\nBedaubed(lucie) and Humid(lucie) -> Endocrine(lucie)\nforall x (Honorific(x) -> Meshugga(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Honorific(x) -> Pathetic(x))\nforall x (Pathetic(x) and Meshugga(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Pathetic(x) -> Honorific(x))\nforall x (Endocrine(x) and Meshugga(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) -> Honorific(x))\n\nnot Unrhymed(glenda)\n\nPathetic(glenda) and forall x (Pathetic(x) -> Honorific(x)) -> therefore Honorific(glenda) Honorific(glenda) and forall x (Honorific(x) -> Meshugga(x)) -> therefore Meshugga(glenda) Pathetic(glenda) and forall x (Pathetic(x) -> Honorific(x)) -> therefore Honorific(glenda) Meshugga(glenda) and Honorific(glenda) and forall x (Meshugga(x) and Honorific(x) -> Unrhymed(x)) -> therefore Unrhymed(glenda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1756"} {"premises": "The daphne engorge the chloe. The daphne is spirant. The daphne flounce the chloe. The chloe engorge the daphne. The chloe is aleatory. The chloe venture the daphne. The chloe flounce the daphne. If something is spirant then it venture the daphne. All barebacked things are diarrhoeal. Big things are barebacked. If something is barebacked and it flounce the daphne then it venture the daphne. If something is aleatory then it venture the chloe. If something flounce the daphne and the daphne is barebacked then it engorge the daphne. If the daphne flounce the chloe and the chloe flounce the daphne then the chloe is modernized. If the daphne engorge the chloe then the chloe is spirant. The daphne engorge the chloe.", "logic": "\nEngorge(daphne, chloe)\nSpirant(daphne)\nFlounce(daphne, chloe)\nEngorge(chloe, daphne)\nAleatory(chloe)\nVenture(chloe, daphne)\nFlounce(chloe, daphne)\nforall x (Spirant(x) -> Venture(x, daphne))\nforall x (Barebacked(x) -> Diarrhoeal(x))\nforall x (Spirant(x) -> Barebacked(x))\nforall x (Barebacked(x) and Flounce(x, daphne) -> Venture(x, daphne))\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Venture(x, chloe))\nforall x (Flounce(x, daphne) and Barebacked(daphne) -> Engorge(x, daphne))\nFlounce(daphne, chloe) and Flounce(chloe, daphne) -> Modernized(chloe)\nEngorge(daphne, chloe) -> Spirant(chloe)\n\nEngorge(daphne, chloe)\n\ntherefore Engorge(daphne, chloe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The arvy motorize the derby. The arvy is tremulous. The arvy place the derby. The derby motorize the arvy. The derby is medial. The derby biff the arvy. The derby place the arvy. If something is tremulous then it biff the arvy. All sarawakian things are calicular. Big things are sarawakian. If something is sarawakian and it place the arvy then it biff the arvy. If something is medial then it biff the derby. If something place the arvy and the arvy is sarawakian then it motorize the arvy. If the arvy place the derby and the derby place the arvy then the derby is repressive. If the arvy motorize the derby then the derby is tremulous. The derby does not need the arvy.", "logic": "\nMotorize(arvy, derby)\nTremulous(arvy)\nPlace(arvy, derby)\nMotorize(derby, arvy)\nMedial(derby)\nBiff(derby, arvy)\nPlace(derby, arvy)\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Biff(x, arvy))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Calicular(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and Place(x, arvy) -> Biff(x, arvy))\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Biff(x, derby))\nforall x (Place(x, arvy) and Sarawakian(arvy) -> Motorize(x, arvy))\nPlace(arvy, derby) and Place(derby, arvy) -> Repressive(derby)\nMotorize(arvy, derby) -> Tremulous(derby)\n\nnot Place(derby, arvy)\n\ntherefore Place(derby, arvy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The brooks jabber the mary. The brooks is plucky. The brooks reacquaint the mary. The mary jabber the brooks. The mary is upland. The mary match the brooks. The mary reacquaint the brooks. If something is plucky then it match the brooks. All separable things are bedaubed. Big things are separable. If something is separable and it reacquaint the brooks then it match the brooks. If something is upland then it match the mary. If something reacquaint the brooks and the brooks is separable then it jabber the brooks. If the brooks reacquaint the mary and the mary reacquaint the brooks then the mary is monetary. If the brooks jabber the mary then the mary is plucky. The mary match the mary.", "logic": "\nJabber(brooks, mary)\nPlucky(brooks)\nReacquaint(brooks, mary)\nJabber(mary, brooks)\nUpland(mary)\nMatch(mary, brooks)\nReacquaint(mary, brooks)\nforall x (Plucky(x) -> Match(x, brooks))\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) -> Separable(x))\nforall x (Separable(x) and Reacquaint(x, brooks) -> Match(x, brooks))\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Match(x, mary))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, brooks) and Separable(brooks) -> Jabber(x, brooks))\nReacquaint(brooks, mary) and Reacquaint(mary, brooks) -> Monetary(mary)\nJabber(brooks, mary) -> Plucky(mary)\n\nMatch(mary, mary)\n\nUpland(mary) and forall x (Upland(x) -> Match(x, mary)) -> therefore Match(mary, mary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The carita obstinate the phil. The carita is advised. The carita insist the phil. The phil obstinate the carita. The phil is accursed. The phil menstruate the carita. The phil insist the carita. If something is advised then it menstruate the carita. All unredeemed things are mousey. Big things are unredeemed. If something is unredeemed and it insist the carita then it menstruate the carita. If something is accursed then it menstruate the phil. If something insist the carita and the carita is unredeemed then it obstinate the carita. If the carita insist the phil and the phil insist the carita then the phil is unfrosted. If the carita obstinate the phil then the phil is advised. The phil is not unfrosted.", "logic": "\nObstinate(carita, phil)\nAdvised(carita)\nInsist(carita, phil)\nObstinate(phil, carita)\nAccursed(phil)\nMenstruate(phil, carita)\nInsist(phil, carita)\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Menstruate(x, carita))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Mousey(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and Insist(x, carita) -> Menstruate(x, carita))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Menstruate(x, phil))\nforall x (Insist(x, carita) and Unredeemed(carita) -> Obstinate(x, carita))\nInsist(carita, phil) and Insist(phil, carita) -> Unfrosted(phil)\nObstinate(carita, phil) -> Advised(phil)\n\nnot Unfrosted(phil)\n\nInsist(carita, phil) and Insist(phil, carita) and Insist(carita, phil) and Insist(phil, carita) -> Unfrosted(phil) -> therefore Unfrosted(phil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The lon accouter the domenico. The lon is lowermost. The lon interject the domenico. The domenico accouter the lon. The domenico is mechanic. The domenico diss the lon. The domenico interject the lon. If something is lowermost then it diss the lon. All consolable things are squandered. Big things are consolable. If something is consolable and it interject the lon then it diss the lon. If something is mechanic then it diss the domenico. If something interject the lon and the lon is consolable then it accouter the lon. If the lon interject the domenico and the domenico interject the lon then the domenico is ready. If the lon accouter the domenico then the domenico is lowermost. The domenico is consolable.", "logic": "\nAccouter(lon, domenico)\nLowermost(lon)\nInterject(lon, domenico)\nAccouter(domenico, lon)\nMechanic(domenico)\nDiss(domenico, lon)\nInterject(domenico, lon)\nforall x (Lowermost(x) -> Diss(x, lon))\nforall x (Consolable(x) -> Squandered(x))\nforall x (Lowermost(x) -> Consolable(x))\nforall x (Consolable(x) and Interject(x, lon) -> Diss(x, lon))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) -> Diss(x, domenico))\nforall x (Interject(x, lon) and Consolable(lon) -> Accouter(x, lon))\nInterject(lon, domenico) and Interject(domenico, lon) -> Ready(domenico)\nAccouter(lon, domenico) -> Lowermost(domenico)\n\nConsolable(domenico)\n\nAccouter(lon, domenico) and Accouter(lon, domenico) -> Lowermost(domenico) -> therefore Lowermost(domenico) Lowermost(domenico) and forall x (Lowermost(x) -> Consolable(x)) -> therefore Consolable(domenico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The jolene grubstake the ingamar. The jolene is boiled. The jolene hoard the ingamar. The ingamar grubstake the jolene. The ingamar is syllabled. The ingamar reconsider the jolene. The ingamar hoard the jolene. If something is boiled then it reconsider the jolene. All aurous things are concerted. Big things are aurous. If something is aurous and it hoard the jolene then it reconsider the jolene. If something is syllabled then it reconsider the ingamar. If something hoard the jolene and the jolene is aurous then it grubstake the jolene. If the jolene hoard the ingamar and the ingamar hoard the jolene then the ingamar is retained. If the jolene grubstake the ingamar then the ingamar is boiled. The jolene is not concerted.", "logic": "\nGrubstake(jolene, ingamar)\nBoiled(jolene)\nHoard(jolene, ingamar)\nGrubstake(ingamar, jolene)\nSyllabled(ingamar)\nReconsider(ingamar, jolene)\nHoard(ingamar, jolene)\nforall x (Boiled(x) -> Reconsider(x, jolene))\nforall x (Aurous(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Boiled(x) -> Aurous(x))\nforall x (Aurous(x) and Hoard(x, jolene) -> Reconsider(x, jolene))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) -> Reconsider(x, ingamar))\nforall x (Hoard(x, jolene) and Aurous(jolene) -> Grubstake(x, jolene))\nHoard(jolene, ingamar) and Hoard(ingamar, jolene) -> Retained(ingamar)\nGrubstake(jolene, ingamar) -> Boiled(ingamar)\n\nnot Concerted(jolene)\n\nBoiled(jolene) and forall x (Boiled(x) -> Aurous(x)) -> therefore Aurous(jolene) Aurous(jolene) and forall x (Aurous(x) -> Concerted(x)) -> therefore Concerted(jolene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The jonathon souse the kath. The jonathon is sassy. The jonathon preclude the kath. The kath souse the jonathon. The kath is struggling. The kath wholesale the jonathon. The kath preclude the jonathon. If something is sassy then it wholesale the jonathon. All anionic things are unkindly. Big things are anionic. If something is anionic and it preclude the jonathon then it wholesale the jonathon. If something is struggling then it wholesale the kath. If something preclude the jonathon and the jonathon is anionic then it souse the jonathon. If the jonathon preclude the kath and the kath preclude the jonathon then the kath is unsanitary. If the jonathon souse the kath then the kath is sassy. The kath is unkindly.", "logic": "\nSouse(jonathon, kath)\nSassy(jonathon)\nPreclude(jonathon, kath)\nSouse(kath, jonathon)\nStruggling(kath)\nWholesale(kath, jonathon)\nPreclude(kath, jonathon)\nforall x (Sassy(x) -> Wholesale(x, jonathon))\nforall x (Anionic(x) -> Unkindly(x))\nforall x (Sassy(x) -> Anionic(x))\nforall x (Anionic(x) and Preclude(x, jonathon) -> Wholesale(x, jonathon))\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Wholesale(x, kath))\nforall x (Preclude(x, jonathon) and Anionic(jonathon) -> Souse(x, jonathon))\nPreclude(jonathon, kath) and Preclude(kath, jonathon) -> Unsanitary(kath)\nSouse(jonathon, kath) -> Sassy(kath)\n\nUnkindly(kath)\n\nSouse(jonathon, kath) and Souse(jonathon, kath) -> Sassy(kath) -> therefore Sassy(kath) Sassy(kath) and forall x (Sassy(x) -> Anionic(x)) -> therefore Anionic(kath) Anionic(kath) and forall x (Anionic(x) -> Unkindly(x)) -> therefore Unkindly(kath)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The kane unsnarl the suzan. The kane is nocent. The kane tick the suzan. The suzan unsnarl the kane. The suzan is lightproof. The suzan pucker the kane. The suzan tick the kane. If something is nocent then it pucker the kane. All behind things are desperate. Big things are behind. If something is behind and it tick the kane then it pucker the kane. If something is lightproof then it pucker the suzan. If something tick the kane and the kane is behind then it unsnarl the kane. If the kane tick the suzan and the suzan tick the kane then the suzan is sibylline. If the kane unsnarl the suzan then the suzan is nocent. The suzan is not desperate.", "logic": "\nUnsnarl(kane, suzan)\nNocent(kane)\nTick(kane, suzan)\nUnsnarl(suzan, kane)\nLightproof(suzan)\nPucker(suzan, kane)\nTick(suzan, kane)\nforall x (Nocent(x) -> Pucker(x, kane))\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Desperate(x))\nforall x (Nocent(x) -> Behind(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) and Tick(x, kane) -> Pucker(x, kane))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Pucker(x, suzan))\nforall x (Tick(x, kane) and Behind(kane) -> Unsnarl(x, kane))\nTick(kane, suzan) and Tick(suzan, kane) -> Sibylline(suzan)\nUnsnarl(kane, suzan) -> Nocent(suzan)\n\nnot Desperate(suzan)\n\nUnsnarl(kane, suzan) and Unsnarl(kane, suzan) -> Nocent(suzan) -> therefore Nocent(suzan) Nocent(suzan) and forall x (Nocent(x) -> Behind(x)) -> therefore Behind(suzan) Behind(suzan) and forall x (Behind(x) -> Desperate(x)) -> therefore Desperate(suzan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The daisi hack the bengt. The daisi is coeliac. The daisi muff the bengt. The bengt hack the daisi. The bengt is olympian. The bengt amount the daisi. The bengt muff the daisi. If something is coeliac then it amount the daisi. All pyrectic things are sunrise. Big things are pyrectic. If something is pyrectic and it muff the daisi then it amount the daisi. If something is olympian then it amount the bengt. If something muff the daisi and the daisi is pyrectic then it hack the daisi. If the daisi muff the bengt and the bengt muff the daisi then the bengt is curious. If the daisi hack the bengt then the bengt is coeliac. The daisi does not eat the daisi.", "logic": "\nHack(daisi, bengt)\nCoeliac(daisi)\nMuff(daisi, bengt)\nHack(bengt, daisi)\nOlympian(bengt)\nAmount(bengt, daisi)\nMuff(bengt, daisi)\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Amount(x, daisi))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) -> Sunrise(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Pyrectic(x))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) and Muff(x, daisi) -> Amount(x, daisi))\nforall x (Olympian(x) -> Amount(x, bengt))\nforall x (Muff(x, daisi) and Pyrectic(daisi) -> Hack(x, daisi))\nMuff(daisi, bengt) and Muff(bengt, daisi) -> Curious(bengt)\nHack(daisi, bengt) -> Coeliac(bengt)\n\nnot Hack(daisi, daisi)\n\nforall x (Muff(x, daisi) and Pyrectic(daisi) -> Hack(x, daisi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The ardenia salute the laney. The ardenia is bladdery. The ardenia coal the laney. The laney salute the ardenia. The laney is austral. The laney subjoin the ardenia. The laney coal the ardenia. If something is bladdery then it subjoin the ardenia. All afire things are athenian. Big things are afire. If something is afire and it coal the ardenia then it subjoin the ardenia. If something is austral then it subjoin the laney. If something coal the ardenia and the ardenia is afire then it salute the ardenia. If the ardenia coal the laney and the laney coal the ardenia then the laney is captive. If the ardenia salute the laney then the laney is bladdery. The ardenia subjoin the laney.", "logic": "\nSalute(ardenia, laney)\nBladdery(ardenia)\nCoal(ardenia, laney)\nSalute(laney, ardenia)\nAustral(laney)\nSubjoin(laney, ardenia)\nCoal(laney, ardenia)\nforall x (Bladdery(x) -> Subjoin(x, ardenia))\nforall x (Afire(x) -> Athenian(x))\nforall x (Bladdery(x) -> Afire(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and Coal(x, ardenia) -> Subjoin(x, ardenia))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Subjoin(x, laney))\nforall x (Coal(x, ardenia) and Afire(ardenia) -> Salute(x, ardenia))\nCoal(ardenia, laney) and Coal(laney, ardenia) -> Captive(laney)\nSalute(ardenia, laney) -> Bladdery(laney)\n\nSubjoin(ardenia, laney)\n\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Subjoin(x, laney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The fox sclaff the greggory. The fox is avertable. The fox grapple the greggory. The greggory sclaff the fox. The greggory is capitulary. The greggory sidetrack the fox. The greggory grapple the fox. If something is avertable then it sidetrack the fox. All formic things are stuffy. Big things are formic. If something is formic and it grapple the fox then it sidetrack the fox. If something is capitulary then it sidetrack the greggory. If something grapple the fox and the fox is formic then it sclaff the fox. If the fox grapple the greggory and the greggory grapple the fox then the greggory is hypnagogic. If the fox sclaff the greggory then the greggory is avertable. The fox does not need the fox.", "logic": "\nSclaff(fox, greggory)\nAvertable(fox)\nGrapple(fox, greggory)\nSclaff(greggory, fox)\nCapitulary(greggory)\nSidetrack(greggory, fox)\nGrapple(greggory, fox)\nforall x (Avertable(x) -> Sidetrack(x, fox))\nforall x (Formic(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Avertable(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Formic(x) and Grapple(x, fox) -> Sidetrack(x, fox))\nforall x (Capitulary(x) -> Sidetrack(x, greggory))\nforall x (Grapple(x, fox) and Formic(fox) -> Sclaff(x, fox))\nGrapple(fox, greggory) and Grapple(greggory, fox) -> Hypnagogic(greggory)\nSclaff(fox, greggory) -> Avertable(greggory)\n\nnot Grapple(fox, fox)\n\nnot Grapple(fox, fox) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The vinnie snuffle the bobbie. The vinnie is antonymous. The vinnie erode the bobbie. The bobbie snuffle the vinnie. The bobbie is harmonical. The bobbie bollocks the vinnie. The bobbie erode the vinnie. If something is antonymous then it bollocks the vinnie. All extensile things are monosemous. Big things are extensile. If something is extensile and it erode the vinnie then it bollocks the vinnie. If something is harmonical then it bollocks the bobbie. If something erode the vinnie and the vinnie is extensile then it snuffle the vinnie. If the vinnie erode the bobbie and the bobbie erode the vinnie then the bobbie is squawky. If the vinnie snuffle the bobbie then the bobbie is antonymous. The vinnie is squawky.", "logic": "\nSnuffle(vinnie, bobbie)\nAntonymous(vinnie)\nErode(vinnie, bobbie)\nSnuffle(bobbie, vinnie)\nHarmonical(bobbie)\nBollocks(bobbie, vinnie)\nErode(bobbie, vinnie)\nforall x (Antonymous(x) -> Bollocks(x, vinnie))\nforall x (Extensile(x) -> Monosemous(x))\nforall x (Antonymous(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) and Erode(x, vinnie) -> Bollocks(x, vinnie))\nforall x (Harmonical(x) -> Bollocks(x, bobbie))\nforall x (Erode(x, vinnie) and Extensile(vinnie) -> Snuffle(x, vinnie))\nErode(vinnie, bobbie) and Erode(bobbie, vinnie) -> Squawky(bobbie)\nSnuffle(vinnie, bobbie) -> Antonymous(bobbie)\n\nSquawky(vinnie)\n\nSquawky(vinnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The jobie company the shanda. The jobie is patrician. The jobie caravan the shanda. The shanda company the jobie. The shanda is debile. The shanda omen the jobie. The shanda caravan the jobie. If something is patrician then it omen the jobie. All iritic things are continuing. Big things are iritic. If something is iritic and it caravan the jobie then it omen the jobie. If something is debile then it omen the shanda. If something caravan the jobie and the jobie is iritic then it company the jobie. If the jobie caravan the shanda and the shanda caravan the jobie then the shanda is grating. If the jobie company the shanda then the shanda is patrician. The jobie is not debile.", "logic": "\nCompany(jobie, shanda)\nPatrician(jobie)\nCaravan(jobie, shanda)\nCompany(shanda, jobie)\nDebile(shanda)\nOmen(shanda, jobie)\nCaravan(shanda, jobie)\nforall x (Patrician(x) -> Omen(x, jobie))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Continuing(x))\nforall x (Patrician(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) and Caravan(x, jobie) -> Omen(x, jobie))\nforall x (Debile(x) -> Omen(x, shanda))\nforall x (Caravan(x, jobie) and Iritic(jobie) -> Company(x, jobie))\nCaravan(jobie, shanda) and Caravan(shanda, jobie) -> Grating(shanda)\nCompany(jobie, shanda) -> Patrician(shanda)\n\nnot Debile(jobie)\n\nnot Debile(jobie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "The horatio humiliate the annalyse. The horatio is unkept. The horatio potter the annalyse. The annalyse humiliate the horatio. The annalyse is bituminoid. The annalyse elapse the horatio. The annalyse potter the horatio. If something is unkept then it elapse the horatio. All uncharted things are probatory. Big things are uncharted. If something is uncharted and it potter the horatio then it elapse the horatio. If something is bituminoid then it elapse the annalyse. If something potter the horatio and the horatio is uncharted then it humiliate the horatio. If the horatio potter the annalyse and the annalyse potter the horatio then the annalyse is ambulant. If the horatio humiliate the annalyse then the annalyse is unkept. The annalyse humiliate the annalyse.", "logic": "\nHumiliate(horatio, annalyse)\nUnkept(horatio)\nPotter(horatio, annalyse)\nHumiliate(annalyse, horatio)\nBituminoid(annalyse)\nElapse(annalyse, horatio)\nPotter(annalyse, horatio)\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Elapse(x, horatio))\nforall x (Uncharted(x) -> Probatory(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Uncharted(x))\nforall x (Uncharted(x) and Potter(x, horatio) -> Elapse(x, horatio))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> Elapse(x, annalyse))\nforall x (Potter(x, horatio) and Uncharted(horatio) -> Humiliate(x, horatio))\nPotter(horatio, annalyse) and Potter(annalyse, horatio) -> Ambulant(annalyse)\nHumiliate(horatio, annalyse) -> Unkept(annalyse)\n\nHumiliate(annalyse, annalyse)\n\nHumiliate(annalyse, annalyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-838"} {"premises": "Starlin is poriferous. Daphne is anisogamic. Daphne is phonologic. Daphne is nude. Thatcher is anisogamic. Thatcher is phonologic. Thatcher is scalene. If someone is nude then they are poriferous. If someone is anisogamic and nude then they are poriferous. If someone is nude then they are poriferous. Big people are nude. If someone is bully then they are nude. If someone is poriferous then they are bully. Thatcher is phonologic.", "logic": "\nPoriferous(starlin)\nAnisogamic(daphne)\nPhonologic(daphne)\nNude(daphne)\nAnisogamic(thatcher)\nPhonologic(thatcher)\nScalene(thatcher)\nforall x (Nude(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Nude(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Nude(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Nude(x))\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Nude(x))\nforall x (Poriferous(x) -> Bully(x))\n\nPhonologic(thatcher)\n\ntherefore Phonologic(thatcher)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Kerry is frail. Mari is chondritic. Mari is aestival. Mari is kingly. Kayley is chondritic. Kayley is aestival. Kayley is noisome. If someone is kingly then they are frail. If someone is chondritic and kingly then they are frail. If someone is kingly then they are frail. Big people are kingly. If someone is unlisted then they are kingly. If someone is frail then they are unlisted. Kayley is not aestival.", "logic": "\nFrail(kerry)\nChondritic(mari)\nAestival(mari)\nKingly(mari)\nChondritic(kayley)\nAestival(kayley)\nNoisome(kayley)\nforall x (Kingly(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Chondritic(x) and Kingly(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Kingly(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Chondritic(x) -> Kingly(x))\nforall x (Unlisted(x) -> Kingly(x))\nforall x (Frail(x) -> Unlisted(x))\n\nnot Aestival(kayley)\n\ntherefore Aestival(kayley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Rosaline is disgustful. Giacinta is mitigated. Giacinta is perennial. Giacinta is ironical. Spence is mitigated. Spence is perennial. Spence is sanguine. If someone is ironical then they are disgustful. If someone is mitigated and ironical then they are disgustful. If someone is ironical then they are disgustful. Big people are ironical. If someone is stout then they are ironical. If someone is disgustful then they are stout. Spence is ironical.", "logic": "\nDisgustful(rosaline)\nMitigated(giacinta)\nPerennial(giacinta)\nIronical(giacinta)\nMitigated(spence)\nPerennial(spence)\nSanguine(spence)\nforall x (Ironical(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) and Ironical(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Ironical(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) -> Ironical(x))\nforall x (Stout(x) -> Ironical(x))\nforall x (Disgustful(x) -> Stout(x))\n\nIronical(spence)\n\nMitigated(spence) and forall x (Mitigated(x) -> Ironical(x)) -> therefore Ironical(spence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Carli is impeded. Mackenzie is unreformed. Mackenzie is bonkers. Mackenzie is sprouted. Lucille is unreformed. Lucille is bonkers. Lucille is steamed. If someone is sprouted then they are impeded. If someone is unreformed and sprouted then they are impeded. If someone is sprouted then they are impeded. Big people are sprouted. If someone is ethnic then they are sprouted. If someone is impeded then they are ethnic. Lucille is not sprouted.", "logic": "\nImpeded(carli)\nUnreformed(mackenzie)\nBonkers(mackenzie)\nSprouted(mackenzie)\nUnreformed(lucille)\nBonkers(lucille)\nSteamed(lucille)\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (Unreformed(x) and Sprouted(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (Unreformed(x) -> Sprouted(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) -> Sprouted(x))\nforall x (Impeded(x) -> Ethnic(x))\n\nnot Sprouted(lucille)\n\nUnreformed(lucille) and forall x (Unreformed(x) -> Sprouted(x)) -> therefore Sprouted(lucille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Meta is persuasive. Gusty is distorted. Gusty is separative. Gusty is winning. Colbert is distorted. Colbert is separative. Colbert is desiccated. If someone is winning then they are persuasive. If someone is distorted and winning then they are persuasive. If someone is winning then they are persuasive. Big people are winning. If someone is grumous then they are winning. If someone is persuasive then they are grumous. Gusty is grumous.", "logic": "\nPersuasive(meta)\nDistorted(gusty)\nSeparative(gusty)\nWinning(gusty)\nDistorted(colbert)\nSeparative(colbert)\nDesiccated(colbert)\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Distorted(x) and Winning(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Distorted(x) -> Winning(x))\nforall x (Grumous(x) -> Winning(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) -> Grumous(x))\n\nGrumous(gusty)\n\nWinning(gusty) and forall x (Winning(x) -> Persuasive(x)) -> therefore Persuasive(gusty) Persuasive(gusty) and forall x (Persuasive(x) -> Grumous(x)) -> therefore Grumous(gusty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Waldon is gordian. Lula is weighted. Lula is vocational. Lula is moralistic. Harriott is weighted. Harriott is vocational. Harriott is certified. If someone is moralistic then they are gordian. If someone is weighted and moralistic then they are gordian. If someone is moralistic then they are gordian. Big people are moralistic. If someone is unbound then they are moralistic. If someone is gordian then they are unbound. Waldon is not moralistic.", "logic": "\nGordian(waldon)\nWeighted(lula)\nVocational(lula)\nMoralistic(lula)\nWeighted(harriott)\nVocational(harriott)\nCertified(harriott)\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Gordian(x))\nforall x (Weighted(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Gordian(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Gordian(x))\nforall x (Weighted(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Gordian(x) -> Unbound(x))\n\nnot Moralistic(waldon)\n\nGordian(waldon) and forall x (Gordian(x) -> Unbound(x)) -> therefore Unbound(waldon) Unbound(waldon) and forall x (Unbound(x) -> Moralistic(x)) -> therefore Moralistic(waldon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Odysseus is daring. Bucky is subaqueous. Bucky is rupestral. Bucky is floodlit. Amandy is subaqueous. Amandy is rupestral. Amandy is ominous. If someone is floodlit then they are daring. If someone is subaqueous and floodlit then they are daring. If someone is floodlit then they are daring. Big people are floodlit. If someone is positivist then they are floodlit. If someone is daring then they are positivist. Amandy is positivist.", "logic": "\nDaring(odysseus)\nSubaqueous(bucky)\nRupestral(bucky)\nFloodlit(bucky)\nSubaqueous(amandy)\nRupestral(amandy)\nOminous(amandy)\nforall x (Floodlit(x) -> Daring(x))\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) and Floodlit(x) -> Daring(x))\nforall x (Floodlit(x) -> Daring(x))\nforall x (Subaqueous(x) -> Floodlit(x))\nforall x (Positivist(x) -> Floodlit(x))\nforall x (Daring(x) -> Positivist(x))\n\nPositivist(amandy)\n\nSubaqueous(amandy) and forall x (Subaqueous(x) -> Floodlit(x)) -> therefore Floodlit(amandy) Floodlit(amandy) and forall x (Floodlit(x) -> Daring(x)) -> therefore Daring(amandy) Daring(amandy) and forall x (Daring(x) -> Positivist(x)) -> therefore Positivist(amandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Annamari is unprepared. Britaney is millennian. Britaney is unseeable. Britaney is vermillion. Krishna is millennian. Krishna is unseeable. Krishna is patronymic. If someone is vermillion then they are unprepared. If someone is millennian and vermillion then they are unprepared. If someone is vermillion then they are unprepared. Big people are vermillion. If someone is gaelic then they are vermillion. If someone is unprepared then they are gaelic. Krishna is not gaelic.", "logic": "\nUnprepared(annamari)\nMillennian(britaney)\nUnseeable(britaney)\nVermillion(britaney)\nMillennian(krishna)\nUnseeable(krishna)\nPatronymic(krishna)\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) and Vermillion(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Vermillion(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Gaelic(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Gaelic(x))\n\nnot Gaelic(krishna)\n\nMillennian(krishna) and forall x (Millennian(x) -> Vermillion(x)) -> therefore Vermillion(krishna) Vermillion(krishna) and forall x (Vermillion(x) -> Unprepared(x)) -> therefore Unprepared(krishna) Unprepared(krishna) and forall x (Unprepared(x) -> Gaelic(x)) -> therefore Gaelic(krishna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Westleigh is freehand. Tann is grown. Tann is irrational. Tann is trancelike. Judah is grown. Judah is irrational. Judah is malleable. If someone is trancelike then they are freehand. If someone is grown and trancelike then they are freehand. If someone is trancelike then they are freehand. Big people are trancelike. If someone is transpolar then they are trancelike. If someone is freehand then they are transpolar. Tann is not blue.", "logic": "\nFreehand(westleigh)\nGrown(tann)\nIrrational(tann)\nTrancelike(tann)\nGrown(judah)\nIrrational(judah)\nMalleable(judah)\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Grown(x) and Trancelike(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Freehand(x))\nforall x (Grown(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Freehand(x) -> Transpolar(x))\n\nnot Blue(tann)\n\nnot Blue(tann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Andriana is intimate. Virginia is removed. Virginia is hooflike. Virginia is reefy. Maria is removed. Maria is hooflike. Maria is cashed. If someone is reefy then they are intimate. If someone is removed and reefy then they are intimate. If someone is reefy then they are intimate. Big people are reefy. If someone is nubby then they are reefy. If someone is intimate then they are nubby. Virginia is cashed.", "logic": "\nIntimate(andriana)\nRemoved(virginia)\nHooflike(virginia)\nReefy(virginia)\nRemoved(maria)\nHooflike(maria)\nCashed(maria)\nforall x (Reefy(x) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Removed(x) and Reefy(x) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Reefy(x) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Removed(x) -> Reefy(x))\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Reefy(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x) -> Nubby(x))\n\nCashed(virginia)\n\nCashed(virginia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Merridie is foppish. Gene is greyed. Gene is laudatory. Gene is liquified. Husain is greyed. Husain is laudatory. Husain is ungathered. If someone is liquified then they are foppish. If someone is greyed and liquified then they are foppish. If someone is liquified then they are foppish. Big people are liquified. If someone is methodical then they are liquified. If someone is foppish then they are methodical. Merridie is not blue.", "logic": "\nFoppish(merridie)\nGreyed(gene)\nLaudatory(gene)\nLiquified(gene)\nGreyed(husain)\nLaudatory(husain)\nUngathered(husain)\nforall x (Liquified(x) -> Foppish(x))\nforall x (Greyed(x) and Liquified(x) -> Foppish(x))\nforall x (Liquified(x) -> Foppish(x))\nforall x (Greyed(x) -> Liquified(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Liquified(x))\nforall x (Foppish(x) -> Methodical(x))\n\nnot Blue(merridie)\n\nnot Blue(merridie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Eleonore is heterodyne. Floria is visualized. Floria is colonised. Floria is rushed. Cyril is visualized. Cyril is colonised. Cyril is foremost. If someone is rushed then they are heterodyne. If someone is visualized and rushed then they are heterodyne. If someone is rushed then they are heterodyne. Big people are rushed. If someone is seminude then they are rushed. If someone is heterodyne then they are seminude. Eleonore is foremost.", "logic": "\nHeterodyne(eleonore)\nVisualized(floria)\nColonised(floria)\nRushed(floria)\nVisualized(cyril)\nColonised(cyril)\nForemost(cyril)\nforall x (Rushed(x) -> Heterodyne(x))\nforall x (Visualized(x) and Rushed(x) -> Heterodyne(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) -> Heterodyne(x))\nforall x (Visualized(x) -> Rushed(x))\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Rushed(x))\nforall x (Heterodyne(x) -> Seminude(x))\n\nForemost(eleonore)\n\nForemost(eleonore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Martyn is obtrusive. Fredrika is unremedied. Fredrika is hitless. Fredrika is pokey. Elissa is unremedied. Elissa is hitless. Elissa is mordant. If someone is pokey then they are obtrusive. If someone is unremedied and pokey then they are obtrusive. If someone is pokey then they are obtrusive. Big people are pokey. If someone is interred then they are pokey. If someone is obtrusive then they are interred. Elissa is not blue.", "logic": "\nObtrusive(martyn)\nUnremedied(fredrika)\nHitless(fredrika)\nPokey(fredrika)\nUnremedied(elissa)\nHitless(elissa)\nMordant(elissa)\nforall x (Pokey(x) -> Obtrusive(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) and Pokey(x) -> Obtrusive(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) -> Obtrusive(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) -> Pokey(x))\nforall x (Interred(x) -> Pokey(x))\nforall x (Obtrusive(x) -> Interred(x))\n\nnot Blue(elissa)\n\nnot Blue(elissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Carla is desired. Osmond is prescient. Osmond is perfumed. Osmond is advancing. Myranda is prescient. Myranda is perfumed. Myranda is legendary. If someone is advancing then they are desired. If someone is prescient and advancing then they are desired. If someone is advancing then they are desired. Big people are advancing. If someone is unwary then they are advancing. If someone is desired then they are unwary. Carla is prescient.", "logic": "\nDesired(carla)\nPrescient(osmond)\nPerfumed(osmond)\nAdvancing(osmond)\nPrescient(myranda)\nPerfumed(myranda)\nLegendary(myranda)\nforall x (Advancing(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Prescient(x) and Advancing(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Advancing(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Prescient(x) -> Advancing(x))\nforall x (Unwary(x) -> Advancing(x))\nforall x (Desired(x) -> Unwary(x))\n\nPrescient(carla)\n\nPrescient(carla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1080"} {"premises": "Aili is occasional. Aili is brushed. Aili is not unseeyn. Aili is mettlesome. Maison is homing. Darin is occasional. Darin is unseeyn. Darin is audenesque. Deina is occasional. Deina is brushed. Deina is not unseeyn. Deina is audenesque. Green people are not audenesque. If Maison is audenesque then Maison is brushed. If Darin is homing then Darin is mettlesome. If Maison is not audenesque then Maison is homelike. If someone is audenesque and not mettlesome then they are occasional. Smart people are occasional. Darin is audenesque.", "logic": "\nOccasional(aili)\nBrushed(aili)\nnot Unseeyn(aili)\nMettlesome(aili)\nHoming(maison)\nOccasional(darin)\nUnseeyn(darin)\nAudenesque(darin)\nOccasional(deina)\nBrushed(deina)\nnot Unseeyn(deina)\nAudenesque(deina)\nforall x (Homing(x) -> not Audenesque(x))\nAudenesque(maison) -> Brushed(maison)\nHoming(darin) -> Mettlesome(darin)\nnot Audenesque(maison) -> Homelike(maison)\nforall x (Audenesque(x) and not Mettlesome(x) -> Occasional(x))\nforall x (Homelike(x) -> Occasional(x))\n\nAudenesque(darin)\n\ntherefore Audenesque(darin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Heinrich is taciturn. Heinrich is avertable. Heinrich is not monitory. Heinrich is unchecked. Marleah is cretaceous. Thornie is taciturn. Thornie is monitory. Thornie is worshipped. Karole is taciturn. Karole is avertable. Karole is not monitory. Karole is worshipped. Green people are not worshipped. If Marleah is worshipped then Marleah is avertable. If Thornie is cretaceous then Thornie is unchecked. If Marleah is not worshipped then Marleah is passant. If someone is worshipped and not unchecked then they are taciturn. Smart people are taciturn. Karole is monitory.", "logic": "\nTaciturn(heinrich)\nAvertable(heinrich)\nnot Monitory(heinrich)\nUnchecked(heinrich)\nCretaceous(marleah)\nTaciturn(thornie)\nMonitory(thornie)\nWorshipped(thornie)\nTaciturn(karole)\nAvertable(karole)\nnot Monitory(karole)\nWorshipped(karole)\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) -> not Worshipped(x))\nWorshipped(marleah) -> Avertable(marleah)\nCretaceous(thornie) -> Unchecked(thornie)\nnot Worshipped(marleah) -> Passant(marleah)\nforall x (Worshipped(x) and not Unchecked(x) -> Taciturn(x))\nforall x (Passant(x) -> Taciturn(x))\n\nMonitory(karole)\n\ntherefore not Monitory(karole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Catherina is actable. Catherina is untuneful. Catherina is not whatever. Catherina is judicial. Sorcha is flowered. Starr is actable. Starr is whatever. Starr is thalassic. Rochell is actable. Rochell is untuneful. Rochell is not whatever. Rochell is thalassic. Green people are not thalassic. If Sorcha is thalassic then Sorcha is untuneful. If Starr is flowered then Starr is judicial. If Sorcha is not thalassic then Sorcha is vengeful. If someone is thalassic and not judicial then they are actable. Smart people are actable. Sorcha is not thalassic.", "logic": "\nActable(catherina)\nUntuneful(catherina)\nnot Whatever(catherina)\nJudicial(catherina)\nFlowered(sorcha)\nActable(starr)\nWhatever(starr)\nThalassic(starr)\nActable(rochell)\nUntuneful(rochell)\nnot Whatever(rochell)\nThalassic(rochell)\nforall x (Flowered(x) -> not Thalassic(x))\nThalassic(sorcha) -> Untuneful(sorcha)\nFlowered(starr) -> Judicial(starr)\nnot Thalassic(sorcha) -> Vengeful(sorcha)\nforall x (Thalassic(x) and not Judicial(x) -> Actable(x))\nforall x (Vengeful(x) -> Actable(x))\n\nnot Thalassic(sorcha)\n\nFlowered(sorcha) and forall x (Flowered(x) -> not Thalassic(x)) -> therefore not Thalassic(sorcha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Ruddie is blowsy. Ruddie is honeyed. Ruddie is not unwarmed. Ruddie is oxidized. Winton is creamy. Gustaf is blowsy. Gustaf is unwarmed. Gustaf is warmed. Lyndon is blowsy. Lyndon is honeyed. Lyndon is not unwarmed. Lyndon is warmed. Green people are not warmed. If Winton is warmed then Winton is honeyed. If Gustaf is creamy then Gustaf is oxidized. If Winton is not warmed then Winton is hospitable. If someone is warmed and not oxidized then they are blowsy. Smart people are blowsy. Winton is warmed.", "logic": "\nBlowsy(ruddie)\nHoneyed(ruddie)\nnot Unwarmed(ruddie)\nOxidized(ruddie)\nCreamy(winton)\nBlowsy(gustaf)\nUnwarmed(gustaf)\nWarmed(gustaf)\nBlowsy(lyndon)\nHoneyed(lyndon)\nnot Unwarmed(lyndon)\nWarmed(lyndon)\nforall x (Creamy(x) -> not Warmed(x))\nWarmed(winton) -> Honeyed(winton)\nCreamy(gustaf) -> Oxidized(gustaf)\nnot Warmed(winton) -> Hospitable(winton)\nforall x (Warmed(x) and not Oxidized(x) -> Blowsy(x))\nforall x (Hospitable(x) -> Blowsy(x))\n\nWarmed(winton)\n\nCreamy(winton) and forall x (Creamy(x) -> not Warmed(x)) -> therefore not Warmed(winton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Ulberto is thenal. Ulberto is cormous. Ulberto is not writhen. Ulberto is ungoverned. Gerrit is apiculate. Will is thenal. Will is writhen. Will is caecilian. Ventura is thenal. Ventura is cormous. Ventura is not writhen. Ventura is caecilian. Green people are not caecilian. If Gerrit is caecilian then Gerrit is cormous. If Will is apiculate then Will is ungoverned. If Gerrit is not caecilian then Gerrit is overripe. If someone is caecilian and not ungoverned then they are thenal. Smart people are thenal. Gerrit is overripe.", "logic": "\nThenal(ulberto)\nCormous(ulberto)\nnot Writhen(ulberto)\nUngoverned(ulberto)\nApiculate(gerrit)\nThenal(will)\nWrithen(will)\nCaecilian(will)\nThenal(ventura)\nCormous(ventura)\nnot Writhen(ventura)\nCaecilian(ventura)\nforall x (Apiculate(x) -> not Caecilian(x))\nCaecilian(gerrit) -> Cormous(gerrit)\nApiculate(will) -> Ungoverned(will)\nnot Caecilian(gerrit) -> Overripe(gerrit)\nforall x (Caecilian(x) and not Ungoverned(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Thenal(x))\n\nOverripe(gerrit)\n\nApiculate(gerrit) and forall x (Apiculate(x) -> not Caecilian(x)) -> therefore not Caecilian(gerrit) not Caecilian(gerrit) and not Caecilian(gerrit) -> Overripe(gerrit) -> therefore Overripe(gerrit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Ruthann is described. Ruthann is communal. Ruthann is not papistical. Ruthann is rhizoidal. Merridie is pyknic. Rikki is described. Rikki is papistical. Rikki is lighted. Noni is described. Noni is communal. Noni is not papistical. Noni is lighted. Green people are not lighted. If Merridie is lighted then Merridie is communal. If Rikki is pyknic then Rikki is rhizoidal. If Merridie is not lighted then Merridie is inwrought. If someone is lighted and not rhizoidal then they are described. Smart people are described. Merridie is not inwrought.", "logic": "\nDescribed(ruthann)\nCommunal(ruthann)\nnot Papistical(ruthann)\nRhizoidal(ruthann)\nPyknic(merridie)\nDescribed(rikki)\nPapistical(rikki)\nLighted(rikki)\nDescribed(noni)\nCommunal(noni)\nnot Papistical(noni)\nLighted(noni)\nforall x (Pyknic(x) -> not Lighted(x))\nLighted(merridie) -> Communal(merridie)\nPyknic(rikki) -> Rhizoidal(rikki)\nnot Lighted(merridie) -> Inwrought(merridie)\nforall x (Lighted(x) and not Rhizoidal(x) -> Described(x))\nforall x (Inwrought(x) -> Described(x))\n\nnot Inwrought(merridie)\n\nPyknic(merridie) and forall x (Pyknic(x) -> not Lighted(x)) -> therefore not Lighted(merridie) not Lighted(merridie) and not Lighted(merridie) -> Inwrought(merridie) -> therefore Inwrought(merridie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Eduardo is continual. Eduardo is cresson. Eduardo is not fertile. Eduardo is tympanic. Howard is knobby. Clair is continual. Clair is fertile. Clair is bound. Melonie is continual. Melonie is cresson. Melonie is not fertile. Melonie is bound. Green people are not bound. If Howard is bound then Howard is cresson. If Clair is knobby then Clair is tympanic. If Howard is not bound then Howard is undersea. If someone is bound and not tympanic then they are continual. Smart people are continual. Howard is continual.", "logic": "\nContinual(eduardo)\nCresson(eduardo)\nnot Fertile(eduardo)\nTympanic(eduardo)\nKnobby(howard)\nContinual(clair)\nFertile(clair)\nBound(clair)\nContinual(melonie)\nCresson(melonie)\nnot Fertile(melonie)\nBound(melonie)\nforall x (Knobby(x) -> not Bound(x))\nBound(howard) -> Cresson(howard)\nKnobby(clair) -> Tympanic(clair)\nnot Bound(howard) -> Undersea(howard)\nforall x (Bound(x) and not Tympanic(x) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Continual(x))\n\nContinual(howard)\n\nKnobby(howard) and forall x (Knobby(x) -> not Bound(x)) -> therefore not Bound(howard) not Bound(howard) and not Bound(howard) -> Undersea(howard) -> therefore Undersea(howard) Undersea(howard) and forall x (Undersea(x) -> Continual(x)) -> therefore Continual(howard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Frederico is polyvalent. Frederico is prenominal. Frederico is not floating. Frederico is naturistic. Jenelle is aquiferous. Thatcher is polyvalent. Thatcher is floating. Thatcher is caitiff. Madelene is polyvalent. Madelene is prenominal. Madelene is not floating. Madelene is caitiff. Green people are not caitiff. If Jenelle is caitiff then Jenelle is prenominal. If Thatcher is aquiferous then Thatcher is naturistic. If Jenelle is not caitiff then Jenelle is vatical. If someone is caitiff and not naturistic then they are polyvalent. Smart people are polyvalent. Jenelle is not polyvalent.", "logic": "\nPolyvalent(frederico)\nPrenominal(frederico)\nnot Floating(frederico)\nNaturistic(frederico)\nAquiferous(jenelle)\nPolyvalent(thatcher)\nFloating(thatcher)\nCaitiff(thatcher)\nPolyvalent(madelene)\nPrenominal(madelene)\nnot Floating(madelene)\nCaitiff(madelene)\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> not Caitiff(x))\nCaitiff(jenelle) -> Prenominal(jenelle)\nAquiferous(thatcher) -> Naturistic(thatcher)\nnot Caitiff(jenelle) -> Vatical(jenelle)\nforall x (Caitiff(x) and not Naturistic(x) -> Polyvalent(x))\nforall x (Vatical(x) -> Polyvalent(x))\n\nnot Polyvalent(jenelle)\n\nAquiferous(jenelle) and forall x (Aquiferous(x) -> not Caitiff(x)) -> therefore not Caitiff(jenelle) not Caitiff(jenelle) and not Caitiff(jenelle) -> Vatical(jenelle) -> therefore Vatical(jenelle) Vatical(jenelle) and forall x (Vatical(x) -> Polyvalent(x)) -> therefore Polyvalent(jenelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Lorain is regardless. Lorain is impudent. Lorain is not sensible. Lorain is innocuous. Barbra is pyrogenous. Charo is regardless. Charo is sensible. Charo is opened. Hugh is regardless. Hugh is impudent. Hugh is not sensible. Hugh is opened. Green people are not opened. If Barbra is opened then Barbra is impudent. If Charo is pyrogenous then Charo is innocuous. If Barbra is not opened then Barbra is untempting. If someone is opened and not innocuous then they are regardless. Smart people are regardless. Barbra is not impudent.", "logic": "\nRegardless(lorain)\nImpudent(lorain)\nnot Sensible(lorain)\nInnocuous(lorain)\nPyrogenous(barbra)\nRegardless(charo)\nSensible(charo)\nOpened(charo)\nRegardless(hugh)\nImpudent(hugh)\nnot Sensible(hugh)\nOpened(hugh)\nforall x (Pyrogenous(x) -> not Opened(x))\nOpened(barbra) -> Impudent(barbra)\nPyrogenous(charo) -> Innocuous(charo)\nnot Opened(barbra) -> Untempting(barbra)\nforall x (Opened(x) and not Innocuous(x) -> Regardless(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> Regardless(x))\n\nnot Impudent(barbra)\n\nOpened(barbra) -> Impudent(barbra) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Chancey is stock. Chancey is disturbing. Chancey is not pearly. Chancey is premiere. Adlai is intensive. Parrnell is stock. Parrnell is pearly. Parrnell is virulent. Aloysius is stock. Aloysius is disturbing. Aloysius is not pearly. Aloysius is virulent. Green people are not virulent. If Adlai is virulent then Adlai is disturbing. If Parrnell is intensive then Parrnell is premiere. If Adlai is not virulent then Adlai is away. If someone is virulent and not premiere then they are stock. Smart people are stock. Parrnell is premiere.", "logic": "\nStock(chancey)\nDisturbing(chancey)\nnot Pearly(chancey)\nPremiere(chancey)\nIntensive(adlai)\nStock(parrnell)\nPearly(parrnell)\nVirulent(parrnell)\nStock(aloysius)\nDisturbing(aloysius)\nnot Pearly(aloysius)\nVirulent(aloysius)\nforall x (Intensive(x) -> not Virulent(x))\nVirulent(adlai) -> Disturbing(adlai)\nIntensive(parrnell) -> Premiere(parrnell)\nnot Virulent(adlai) -> Away(adlai)\nforall x (Virulent(x) and not Premiere(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Away(x) -> Stock(x))\n\nPremiere(parrnell)\n\nIntensive(parrnell) -> Premiere(parrnell) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Ralph is inhuman. Ralph is vertebrate. Ralph is not splintery. Ralph is next. Hestia is uncoupled. Mugsy is inhuman. Mugsy is splintery. Mugsy is lotic. Kippie is inhuman. Kippie is vertebrate. Kippie is not splintery. Kippie is lotic. Green people are not lotic. If Hestia is lotic then Hestia is vertebrate. If Mugsy is uncoupled then Mugsy is next. If Hestia is not lotic then Hestia is billionth. If someone is lotic and not next then they are inhuman. Smart people are inhuman. Kippie is not uncoupled.", "logic": "\nInhuman(ralph)\nVertebrate(ralph)\nnot Splintery(ralph)\nNext(ralph)\nUncoupled(hestia)\nInhuman(mugsy)\nSplintery(mugsy)\nLotic(mugsy)\nInhuman(kippie)\nVertebrate(kippie)\nnot Splintery(kippie)\nLotic(kippie)\nforall x (Uncoupled(x) -> not Lotic(x))\nLotic(hestia) -> Vertebrate(hestia)\nUncoupled(mugsy) -> Next(mugsy)\nnot Lotic(hestia) -> Billionth(hestia)\nforall x (Lotic(x) and not Next(x) -> Inhuman(x))\nforall x (Billionth(x) -> Inhuman(x))\n\nnot Uncoupled(kippie)\n\nnot Uncoupled(kippie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Hershel is spangly. Hershel is assamese. Hershel is not saltish. Hershel is emphatic. Bunny is epistolary. Maryann is spangly. Maryann is saltish. Maryann is babelike. Greggory is spangly. Greggory is assamese. Greggory is not saltish. Greggory is babelike. Green people are not babelike. If Bunny is babelike then Bunny is assamese. If Maryann is epistolary then Maryann is emphatic. If Bunny is not babelike then Bunny is hardbound. If someone is babelike and not emphatic then they are spangly. Smart people are spangly. Bunny is saltish.", "logic": "\nSpangly(hershel)\nAssamese(hershel)\nnot Saltish(hershel)\nEmphatic(hershel)\nEpistolary(bunny)\nSpangly(maryann)\nSaltish(maryann)\nBabelike(maryann)\nSpangly(greggory)\nAssamese(greggory)\nnot Saltish(greggory)\nBabelike(greggory)\nforall x (Epistolary(x) -> not Babelike(x))\nBabelike(bunny) -> Assamese(bunny)\nEpistolary(maryann) -> Emphatic(maryann)\nnot Babelike(bunny) -> Hardbound(bunny)\nforall x (Babelike(x) and not Emphatic(x) -> Spangly(x))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) -> Spangly(x))\n\nSaltish(bunny)\n\nSaltish(bunny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Rosalinde is detersive. Rosalinde is proven. Rosalinde is not lxxxvi. Rosalinde is canine. Imogen is cheeky. Carroll is detersive. Carroll is lxxxvi. Carroll is wounding. Bellina is detersive. Bellina is proven. Bellina is not lxxxvi. Bellina is wounding. Green people are not wounding. If Imogen is wounding then Imogen is proven. If Carroll is cheeky then Carroll is canine. If Imogen is not wounding then Imogen is lifeless. If someone is wounding and not canine then they are detersive. Smart people are detersive. Bellina is not lifeless.", "logic": "\nDetersive(rosalinde)\nProven(rosalinde)\nnot Lxxxvi(rosalinde)\nCanine(rosalinde)\nCheeky(imogen)\nDetersive(carroll)\nLxxxvi(carroll)\nWounding(carroll)\nDetersive(bellina)\nProven(bellina)\nnot Lxxxvi(bellina)\nWounding(bellina)\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> not Wounding(x))\nWounding(imogen) -> Proven(imogen)\nCheeky(carroll) -> Canine(carroll)\nnot Wounding(imogen) -> Lifeless(imogen)\nforall x (Wounding(x) and not Canine(x) -> Detersive(x))\nforall x (Lifeless(x) -> Detersive(x))\n\nnot Lifeless(bellina)\n\nnot Lifeless(bellina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Andrzej is unable. Andrzej is ionic. Andrzej is not diestrual. Andrzej is glossy. Hendrik is veiled. Candi is unable. Candi is diestrual. Candi is infallible. Berny is unable. Berny is ionic. Berny is not diestrual. Berny is infallible. Green people are not infallible. If Hendrik is infallible then Hendrik is ionic. If Candi is veiled then Candi is glossy. If Hendrik is not infallible then Hendrik is bacterial. If someone is infallible and not glossy then they are unable. Smart people are unable. Andrzej is bacterial.", "logic": "\nUnable(andrzej)\nIonic(andrzej)\nnot Diestrual(andrzej)\nGlossy(andrzej)\nVeiled(hendrik)\nUnable(candi)\nDiestrual(candi)\nInfallible(candi)\nUnable(berny)\nIonic(berny)\nnot Diestrual(berny)\nInfallible(berny)\nforall x (Veiled(x) -> not Infallible(x))\nInfallible(hendrik) -> Ionic(hendrik)\nVeiled(candi) -> Glossy(candi)\nnot Infallible(hendrik) -> Bacterial(hendrik)\nforall x (Infallible(x) and not Glossy(x) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Bacterial(x) -> Unable(x))\n\nBacterial(andrzej)\n\nBacterial(andrzej) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Manfred is awake. Manfred is nomothetic. Manfred is not orchestral. Manfred is globular. Cally is romany. Kali is awake. Kali is orchestral. Kali is lipophilic. Sydelle is awake. Sydelle is nomothetic. Sydelle is not orchestral. Sydelle is lipophilic. Green people are not lipophilic. If Cally is lipophilic then Cally is nomothetic. If Kali is romany then Kali is globular. If Cally is not lipophilic then Cally is unconfined. If someone is lipophilic and not globular then they are awake. Smart people are awake. Cally is not globular.", "logic": "\nAwake(manfred)\nNomothetic(manfred)\nnot Orchestral(manfred)\nGlobular(manfred)\nRomany(cally)\nAwake(kali)\nOrchestral(kali)\nLipophilic(kali)\nAwake(sydelle)\nNomothetic(sydelle)\nnot Orchestral(sydelle)\nLipophilic(sydelle)\nforall x (Romany(x) -> not Lipophilic(x))\nLipophilic(cally) -> Nomothetic(cally)\nRomany(kali) -> Globular(kali)\nnot Lipophilic(cally) -> Unconfined(cally)\nforall x (Lipophilic(x) and not Globular(x) -> Awake(x))\nforall x (Unconfined(x) -> Awake(x))\n\nnot Globular(cally)\n\nnot Globular(cally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "Jerrylee is silent. Jerrylee is well. Jerrylee is not unstilted. Jerrylee is malodorous. Gabey is mercerized. Nessa is silent. Nessa is unstilted. Nessa is contextual. Troy is silent. Troy is well. Troy is not unstilted. Troy is contextual. Green people are not contextual. If Gabey is contextual then Gabey is well. If Nessa is mercerized then Nessa is malodorous. If Gabey is not contextual then Gabey is worth. If someone is contextual and not malodorous then they are silent. Smart people are silent. Troy is malodorous.", "logic": "\nSilent(jerrylee)\nWell(jerrylee)\nnot Unstilted(jerrylee)\nMalodorous(jerrylee)\nMercerized(gabey)\nSilent(nessa)\nUnstilted(nessa)\nContextual(nessa)\nSilent(troy)\nWell(troy)\nnot Unstilted(troy)\nContextual(troy)\nforall x (Mercerized(x) -> not Contextual(x))\nContextual(gabey) -> Well(gabey)\nMercerized(nessa) -> Malodorous(nessa)\nnot Contextual(gabey) -> Worth(gabey)\nforall x (Contextual(x) and not Malodorous(x) -> Silent(x))\nforall x (Worth(x) -> Silent(x))\n\nMalodorous(troy)\n\nMalodorous(troy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1064"} {"premises": "The parnell apprentice the nikkie. The mendel apprentice the allin. The mendel compass the parnell. The allin apprentice the nikkie. The allin is amyloidal. The allin is katabolic. The nikkie is agape. If something apprentice the parnell and the parnell sanctify the allin then the allin sanctify the parnell. If something compass the allin then the allin compass the nikkie. If the nikkie is katabolic and the nikkie sanctify the mendel then the mendel apprentice the nikkie. If something sanctify the allin and it is piteous then it apprentice the allin. If something apprentice the mendel then the mendel sanctify the allin. If the mendel compass the parnell then the mendel compass the allin. If something compass the nikkie then the nikkie apprentice the mendel. If something is piteous and it apprentice the nikkie then the nikkie apprentice the parnell. The allin is amyloidal.", "logic": "\nApprentice(parnell, nikkie)\nApprentice(mendel, allin)\nCompass(mendel, parnell)\nApprentice(allin, nikkie)\nAmyloidal(allin)\nKatabolic(allin)\nAgape(nikkie)\nforall x (Apprentice(x, parnell) and Sanctify(parnell, allin) -> Sanctify(allin, parnell))\nforall x (Compass(x, allin) -> Compass(allin, nikkie))\nKatabolic(nikkie) and Sanctify(nikkie, mendel) -> Apprentice(mendel, nikkie)\nforall x (Sanctify(x, allin) and Piteous(x) -> Apprentice(x, allin))\nforall x (Apprentice(x, mendel) -> Sanctify(mendel, allin))\nCompass(mendel, parnell) -> Compass(mendel, allin)\nforall x (Compass(x, nikkie) -> Apprentice(nikkie, mendel))\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Apprentice(x, nikkie) -> Apprentice(nikkie, parnell))\n\nAmyloidal(allin)\n\ntherefore Amyloidal(allin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The cletus divert the kraig. The lucine divert the melisent. The lucine peptize the cletus. The melisent divert the kraig. The melisent is biracial. The melisent is mislabeled. The kraig is ostensive. If something divert the cletus and the cletus shake the melisent then the melisent shake the cletus. If something peptize the melisent then the melisent peptize the kraig. If the kraig is mislabeled and the kraig shake the lucine then the lucine divert the kraig. If something shake the melisent and it is unshelled then it divert the melisent. If something divert the lucine then the lucine shake the melisent. If the lucine peptize the cletus then the lucine peptize the melisent. If something peptize the kraig then the kraig divert the lucine. If something is unshelled and it divert the kraig then the kraig divert the cletus. The melisent does not chase the kraig.", "logic": "\nDivert(cletus, kraig)\nDivert(lucine, melisent)\nPeptize(lucine, cletus)\nDivert(melisent, kraig)\nBiracial(melisent)\nMislabeled(melisent)\nOstensive(kraig)\nforall x (Divert(x, cletus) and Shake(cletus, melisent) -> Shake(melisent, cletus))\nforall x (Peptize(x, melisent) -> Peptize(melisent, kraig))\nMislabeled(kraig) and Shake(kraig, lucine) -> Divert(lucine, kraig)\nforall x (Shake(x, melisent) and Unshelled(x) -> Divert(x, melisent))\nforall x (Divert(x, lucine) -> Shake(lucine, melisent))\nPeptize(lucine, cletus) -> Peptize(lucine, melisent)\nforall x (Peptize(x, kraig) -> Divert(kraig, lucine))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) and Divert(x, kraig) -> Divert(kraig, cletus))\n\nnot Divert(melisent, kraig)\n\ntherefore Divert(melisent, kraig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The andromeda bespatter the nicholas. The quintilla bespatter the glenda. The quintilla tend the andromeda. The glenda bespatter the nicholas. The glenda is breastless. The glenda is shelflike. The nicholas is tibetan. If something bespatter the andromeda and the andromeda telefax the glenda then the glenda telefax the andromeda. If something tend the glenda then the glenda tend the nicholas. If the nicholas is shelflike and the nicholas telefax the quintilla then the quintilla bespatter the nicholas. If something telefax the glenda and it is raftered then it bespatter the glenda. If something bespatter the quintilla then the quintilla telefax the glenda. If the quintilla tend the andromeda then the quintilla tend the glenda. If something tend the nicholas then the nicholas bespatter the quintilla. If something is raftered and it bespatter the nicholas then the nicholas bespatter the andromeda. The quintilla tend the glenda.", "logic": "\nBespatter(andromeda, nicholas)\nBespatter(quintilla, glenda)\nTend(quintilla, andromeda)\nBespatter(glenda, nicholas)\nBreastless(glenda)\nShelflike(glenda)\nTibetan(nicholas)\nforall x (Bespatter(x, andromeda) and Telefax(andromeda, glenda) -> Telefax(glenda, andromeda))\nforall x (Tend(x, glenda) -> Tend(glenda, nicholas))\nShelflike(nicholas) and Telefax(nicholas, quintilla) -> Bespatter(quintilla, nicholas)\nforall x (Telefax(x, glenda) and Raftered(x) -> Bespatter(x, glenda))\nforall x (Bespatter(x, quintilla) -> Telefax(quintilla, glenda))\nTend(quintilla, andromeda) -> Tend(quintilla, glenda)\nforall x (Tend(x, nicholas) -> Bespatter(nicholas, quintilla))\nforall x (Raftered(x) and Bespatter(x, nicholas) -> Bespatter(nicholas, andromeda))\n\nTend(quintilla, glenda)\n\nTend(quintilla, andromeda) and Tend(quintilla, andromeda) -> Tend(quintilla, glenda) -> therefore Tend(quintilla, glenda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The leanor wend the judi. The reeva wend the wilma. The reeva actuate the leanor. The wilma wend the judi. The wilma is excusatory. The wilma is phantasmal. The judi is berrylike. If something wend the leanor and the leanor solemnise the wilma then the wilma solemnise the leanor. If something actuate the wilma then the wilma actuate the judi. If the judi is phantasmal and the judi solemnise the reeva then the reeva wend the judi. If something solemnise the wilma and it is stigmatic then it wend the wilma. If something wend the reeva then the reeva solemnise the wilma. If the reeva actuate the leanor then the reeva actuate the wilma. If something actuate the judi then the judi wend the reeva. If something is stigmatic and it wend the judi then the judi wend the leanor. The reeva does not visit the wilma.", "logic": "\nWend(leanor, judi)\nWend(reeva, wilma)\nActuate(reeva, leanor)\nWend(wilma, judi)\nExcusatory(wilma)\nPhantasmal(wilma)\nBerrylike(judi)\nforall x (Wend(x, leanor) and Solemnise(leanor, wilma) -> Solemnise(wilma, leanor))\nforall x (Actuate(x, wilma) -> Actuate(wilma, judi))\nPhantasmal(judi) and Solemnise(judi, reeva) -> Wend(reeva, judi)\nforall x (Solemnise(x, wilma) and Stigmatic(x) -> Wend(x, wilma))\nforall x (Wend(x, reeva) -> Solemnise(reeva, wilma))\nActuate(reeva, leanor) -> Actuate(reeva, wilma)\nforall x (Actuate(x, judi) -> Wend(judi, reeva))\nforall x (Stigmatic(x) and Wend(x, judi) -> Wend(judi, leanor))\n\nnot Actuate(reeva, wilma)\n\nActuate(reeva, leanor) and Actuate(reeva, leanor) -> Actuate(reeva, wilma) -> therefore Actuate(reeva, wilma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The partha loose the aurelia. The mireielle loose the kissiah. The mireielle conjoin the partha. The kissiah loose the aurelia. The kissiah is scandent. The kissiah is equable. The aurelia is taxpaying. If something loose the partha and the partha bodge the kissiah then the kissiah bodge the partha. If something conjoin the kissiah then the kissiah conjoin the aurelia. If the aurelia is equable and the aurelia bodge the mireielle then the mireielle loose the aurelia. If something bodge the kissiah and it is usual then it loose the kissiah. If something loose the mireielle then the mireielle bodge the kissiah. If the mireielle conjoin the partha then the mireielle conjoin the kissiah. If something conjoin the aurelia then the aurelia loose the mireielle. If something is usual and it loose the aurelia then the aurelia loose the partha. The kissiah conjoin the aurelia.", "logic": "\nLoose(partha, aurelia)\nLoose(mireielle, kissiah)\nConjoin(mireielle, partha)\nLoose(kissiah, aurelia)\nScandent(kissiah)\nEquable(kissiah)\nTaxpaying(aurelia)\nforall x (Loose(x, partha) and Bodge(partha, kissiah) -> Bodge(kissiah, partha))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, kissiah) -> Conjoin(kissiah, aurelia))\nEquable(aurelia) and Bodge(aurelia, mireielle) -> Loose(mireielle, aurelia)\nforall x (Bodge(x, kissiah) and Usual(x) -> Loose(x, kissiah))\nforall x (Loose(x, mireielle) -> Bodge(mireielle, kissiah))\nConjoin(mireielle, partha) -> Conjoin(mireielle, kissiah)\nforall x (Conjoin(x, aurelia) -> Loose(aurelia, mireielle))\nforall x (Usual(x) and Loose(x, aurelia) -> Loose(aurelia, partha))\n\nConjoin(kissiah, aurelia)\n\nConjoin(mireielle, partha) and Conjoin(mireielle, partha) -> Conjoin(mireielle, kissiah) -> therefore Conjoin(mireielle, kissiah) Conjoin(mireielle, kissiah) and forall x (Conjoin(x, kissiah) -> Conjoin(kissiah, aurelia)) -> therefore Conjoin(kissiah, aurelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The joan escape the gerry. The alice escape the dominique. The alice cere the joan. The dominique escape the gerry. The dominique is swanky. The dominique is uncapped. The gerry is malted. If something escape the joan and the joan drone the dominique then the dominique drone the joan. If something cere the dominique then the dominique cere the gerry. If the gerry is uncapped and the gerry drone the alice then the alice escape the gerry. If something drone the dominique and it is rimed then it escape the dominique. If something escape the alice then the alice drone the dominique. If the alice cere the joan then the alice cere the dominique. If something cere the gerry then the gerry escape the alice. If something is rimed and it escape the gerry then the gerry escape the joan. The dominique does not visit the gerry.", "logic": "\nEscape(joan, gerry)\nEscape(alice, dominique)\nCere(alice, joan)\nEscape(dominique, gerry)\nSwanky(dominique)\nUncapped(dominique)\nMalted(gerry)\nforall x (Escape(x, joan) and Drone(joan, dominique) -> Drone(dominique, joan))\nforall x (Cere(x, dominique) -> Cere(dominique, gerry))\nUncapped(gerry) and Drone(gerry, alice) -> Escape(alice, gerry)\nforall x (Drone(x, dominique) and Rimed(x) -> Escape(x, dominique))\nforall x (Escape(x, alice) -> Drone(alice, dominique))\nCere(alice, joan) -> Cere(alice, dominique)\nforall x (Cere(x, gerry) -> Escape(gerry, alice))\nforall x (Rimed(x) and Escape(x, gerry) -> Escape(gerry, joan))\n\nnot Cere(dominique, gerry)\n\nCere(alice, joan) and Cere(alice, joan) -> Cere(alice, dominique) -> therefore Cere(alice, dominique) Cere(alice, dominique) and forall x (Cere(x, dominique) -> Cere(dominique, gerry)) -> therefore Cere(dominique, gerry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The shorty bewilder the harmon. The farrah bewilder the rhett. The farrah displace the shorty. The rhett bewilder the harmon. The rhett is understood. The rhett is roughened. The harmon is assisted. If something bewilder the shorty and the shorty laicise the rhett then the rhett laicise the shorty. If something displace the rhett then the rhett displace the harmon. If the harmon is roughened and the harmon laicise the farrah then the farrah bewilder the harmon. If something laicise the rhett and it is receding then it bewilder the rhett. If something bewilder the farrah then the farrah laicise the rhett. If the farrah displace the shorty then the farrah displace the rhett. If something displace the harmon then the harmon bewilder the farrah. If something is receding and it bewilder the harmon then the harmon bewilder the shorty. The harmon bewilder the farrah.", "logic": "\nBewilder(shorty, harmon)\nBewilder(farrah, rhett)\nDisplace(farrah, shorty)\nBewilder(rhett, harmon)\nUnderstood(rhett)\nRoughened(rhett)\nAssisted(harmon)\nforall x (Bewilder(x, shorty) and Laicise(shorty, rhett) -> Laicise(rhett, shorty))\nforall x (Displace(x, rhett) -> Displace(rhett, harmon))\nRoughened(harmon) and Laicise(harmon, farrah) -> Bewilder(farrah, harmon)\nforall x (Laicise(x, rhett) and Receding(x) -> Bewilder(x, rhett))\nforall x (Bewilder(x, farrah) -> Laicise(farrah, rhett))\nDisplace(farrah, shorty) -> Displace(farrah, rhett)\nforall x (Displace(x, harmon) -> Bewilder(harmon, farrah))\nforall x (Receding(x) and Bewilder(x, harmon) -> Bewilder(harmon, shorty))\n\nBewilder(harmon, farrah)\n\nDisplace(farrah, shorty) and Displace(farrah, shorty) -> Displace(farrah, rhett) -> therefore Displace(farrah, rhett) Displace(farrah, rhett) and forall x (Displace(x, rhett) -> Displace(rhett, harmon)) -> therefore Displace(rhett, harmon) Displace(rhett, harmon) and forall x (Displace(x, harmon) -> Bewilder(harmon, farrah)) -> therefore Bewilder(harmon, farrah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The sela memorize the locke. The georgine memorize the celestia. The georgine muddy the sela. The celestia memorize the locke. The celestia is bigmouthed. The celestia is raging. The locke is inclement. If something memorize the sela and the sela debunk the celestia then the celestia debunk the sela. If something muddy the celestia then the celestia muddy the locke. If the locke is raging and the locke debunk the georgine then the georgine memorize the locke. If something debunk the celestia and it is scaly then it memorize the celestia. If something memorize the georgine then the georgine debunk the celestia. If the georgine muddy the sela then the georgine muddy the celestia. If something muddy the locke then the locke memorize the georgine. If something is scaly and it memorize the locke then the locke memorize the sela. The locke does not chase the georgine.", "logic": "\nMemorize(sela, locke)\nMemorize(georgine, celestia)\nMuddy(georgine, sela)\nMemorize(celestia, locke)\nBigmouthed(celestia)\nRaging(celestia)\nInclement(locke)\nforall x (Memorize(x, sela) and Debunk(sela, celestia) -> Debunk(celestia, sela))\nforall x (Muddy(x, celestia) -> Muddy(celestia, locke))\nRaging(locke) and Debunk(locke, georgine) -> Memorize(georgine, locke)\nforall x (Debunk(x, celestia) and Scaly(x) -> Memorize(x, celestia))\nforall x (Memorize(x, georgine) -> Debunk(georgine, celestia))\nMuddy(georgine, sela) -> Muddy(georgine, celestia)\nforall x (Muddy(x, locke) -> Memorize(locke, georgine))\nforall x (Scaly(x) and Memorize(x, locke) -> Memorize(locke, sela))\n\nnot Memorize(locke, georgine)\n\nMuddy(georgine, sela) and Muddy(georgine, sela) -> Muddy(georgine, celestia) -> therefore Muddy(georgine, celestia) Muddy(georgine, celestia) and forall x (Muddy(x, celestia) -> Muddy(celestia, locke)) -> therefore Muddy(celestia, locke) Muddy(celestia, locke) and forall x (Muddy(x, locke) -> Memorize(locke, georgine)) -> therefore Memorize(locke, georgine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The dacia eulogize the clo. The toma eulogize the jorry. The toma apologise the dacia. The jorry eulogize the clo. The jorry is foolhardy. The jorry is residual. The clo is arthurian. If something eulogize the dacia and the dacia sneak the jorry then the jorry sneak the dacia. If something apologise the jorry then the jorry apologise the clo. If the clo is residual and the clo sneak the toma then the toma eulogize the clo. If something sneak the jorry and it is shiftless then it eulogize the jorry. If something eulogize the toma then the toma sneak the jorry. If the toma apologise the dacia then the toma apologise the jorry. If something apologise the clo then the clo eulogize the toma. If something is shiftless and it eulogize the clo then the clo eulogize the dacia. The toma does not chase the clo.", "logic": "\nEulogize(dacia, clo)\nEulogize(toma, jorry)\nApologise(toma, dacia)\nEulogize(jorry, clo)\nFoolhardy(jorry)\nResidual(jorry)\nArthurian(clo)\nforall x (Eulogize(x, dacia) and Sneak(dacia, jorry) -> Sneak(jorry, dacia))\nforall x (Apologise(x, jorry) -> Apologise(jorry, clo))\nResidual(clo) and Sneak(clo, toma) -> Eulogize(toma, clo)\nforall x (Sneak(x, jorry) and Shiftless(x) -> Eulogize(x, jorry))\nforall x (Eulogize(x, toma) -> Sneak(toma, jorry))\nApologise(toma, dacia) -> Apologise(toma, jorry)\nforall x (Apologise(x, clo) -> Eulogize(clo, toma))\nforall x (Shiftless(x) and Eulogize(x, clo) -> Eulogize(clo, dacia))\n\nnot Eulogize(toma, clo)\n\nResidual(clo) and Sneak(clo, toma) -> Eulogize(toma, clo) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The dalia cage the bryan. The avrit cage the kelcie. The avrit extricate the dalia. The kelcie cage the bryan. The kelcie is bullheaded. The kelcie is rubbery. The bryan is monastical. If something cage the dalia and the dalia sympathize the kelcie then the kelcie sympathize the dalia. If something extricate the kelcie then the kelcie extricate the bryan. If the bryan is rubbery and the bryan sympathize the avrit then the avrit cage the bryan. If something sympathize the kelcie and it is precious then it cage the kelcie. If something cage the avrit then the avrit sympathize the kelcie. If the avrit extricate the dalia then the avrit extricate the kelcie. If something extricate the bryan then the bryan cage the avrit. If something is precious and it cage the bryan then the bryan cage the dalia. The kelcie sympathize the dalia.", "logic": "\nCage(dalia, bryan)\nCage(avrit, kelcie)\nExtricate(avrit, dalia)\nCage(kelcie, bryan)\nBullheaded(kelcie)\nRubbery(kelcie)\nMonastical(bryan)\nforall x (Cage(x, dalia) and Sympathize(dalia, kelcie) -> Sympathize(kelcie, dalia))\nforall x (Extricate(x, kelcie) -> Extricate(kelcie, bryan))\nRubbery(bryan) and Sympathize(bryan, avrit) -> Cage(avrit, bryan)\nforall x (Sympathize(x, kelcie) and Precious(x) -> Cage(x, kelcie))\nforall x (Cage(x, avrit) -> Sympathize(avrit, kelcie))\nExtricate(avrit, dalia) -> Extricate(avrit, kelcie)\nforall x (Extricate(x, bryan) -> Cage(bryan, avrit))\nforall x (Precious(x) and Cage(x, bryan) -> Cage(bryan, dalia))\n\nSympathize(kelcie, dalia)\n\nforall x (Cage(x, dalia) and Sympathize(dalia, kelcie) -> Sympathize(kelcie, dalia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The ulrike prostrate the rodina. The huey prostrate the rickie. The huey reassign the ulrike. The rickie prostrate the rodina. The rickie is shipshape. The rickie is alaskan. The rodina is basipetal. If something prostrate the ulrike and the ulrike interweave the rickie then the rickie interweave the ulrike. If something reassign the rickie then the rickie reassign the rodina. If the rodina is alaskan and the rodina interweave the huey then the huey prostrate the rodina. If something interweave the rickie and it is flying then it prostrate the rickie. If something prostrate the huey then the huey interweave the rickie. If the huey reassign the ulrike then the huey reassign the rickie. If something reassign the rodina then the rodina prostrate the huey. If something is flying and it prostrate the rodina then the rodina prostrate the ulrike. The rodina does not chase the rickie.", "logic": "\nProstrate(ulrike, rodina)\nProstrate(huey, rickie)\nReassign(huey, ulrike)\nProstrate(rickie, rodina)\nShipshape(rickie)\nAlaskan(rickie)\nBasipetal(rodina)\nforall x (Prostrate(x, ulrike) and Interweave(ulrike, rickie) -> Interweave(rickie, ulrike))\nforall x (Reassign(x, rickie) -> Reassign(rickie, rodina))\nAlaskan(rodina) and Interweave(rodina, huey) -> Prostrate(huey, rodina)\nforall x (Interweave(x, rickie) and Flying(x) -> Prostrate(x, rickie))\nforall x (Prostrate(x, huey) -> Interweave(huey, rickie))\nReassign(huey, ulrike) -> Reassign(huey, rickie)\nforall x (Reassign(x, rodina) -> Prostrate(rodina, huey))\nforall x (Flying(x) and Prostrate(x, rodina) -> Prostrate(rodina, ulrike))\n\nnot Prostrate(rodina, rickie)\n\nforall x (Interweave(x, rickie) and Flying(x) -> Prostrate(x, rickie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The harris voyage the pauletta. The rori voyage the sampson. The rori impose the harris. The sampson voyage the pauletta. The sampson is scattered. The sampson is twisty. The pauletta is rootless. If something voyage the harris and the harris baronetise the sampson then the sampson baronetise the harris. If something impose the sampson then the sampson impose the pauletta. If the pauletta is twisty and the pauletta baronetise the rori then the rori voyage the pauletta. If something baronetise the sampson and it is acyclic then it voyage the sampson. If something voyage the rori then the rori baronetise the sampson. If the rori impose the harris then the rori impose the sampson. If something impose the pauletta then the pauletta voyage the rori. If something is acyclic and it voyage the pauletta then the pauletta voyage the harris. The sampson voyage the sampson.", "logic": "\nVoyage(harris, pauletta)\nVoyage(rori, sampson)\nImpose(rori, harris)\nVoyage(sampson, pauletta)\nScattered(sampson)\nTwisty(sampson)\nRootless(pauletta)\nforall x (Voyage(x, harris) and Baronetise(harris, sampson) -> Baronetise(sampson, harris))\nforall x (Impose(x, sampson) -> Impose(sampson, pauletta))\nTwisty(pauletta) and Baronetise(pauletta, rori) -> Voyage(rori, pauletta)\nforall x (Baronetise(x, sampson) and Acyclic(x) -> Voyage(x, sampson))\nforall x (Voyage(x, rori) -> Baronetise(rori, sampson))\nImpose(rori, harris) -> Impose(rori, sampson)\nforall x (Impose(x, pauletta) -> Voyage(pauletta, rori))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) and Voyage(x, pauletta) -> Voyage(pauletta, harris))\n\nVoyage(sampson, sampson)\n\nforall x (Baronetise(x, sampson) and Acyclic(x) -> Voyage(x, sampson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The yonina cling the elden. The nahum cling the lorilyn. The nahum calcimine the yonina. The lorilyn cling the elden. The lorilyn is styptic. The lorilyn is monastical. The elden is adducent. If something cling the yonina and the yonina scare the lorilyn then the lorilyn scare the yonina. If something calcimine the lorilyn then the lorilyn calcimine the elden. If the elden is monastical and the elden scare the nahum then the nahum cling the elden. If something scare the lorilyn and it is barefoot then it cling the lorilyn. If something cling the nahum then the nahum scare the lorilyn. If the nahum calcimine the yonina then the nahum calcimine the lorilyn. If something calcimine the elden then the elden cling the nahum. If something is barefoot and it cling the elden then the elden cling the yonina. The nahum is not styptic.", "logic": "\nCling(yonina, elden)\nCling(nahum, lorilyn)\nCalcimine(nahum, yonina)\nCling(lorilyn, elden)\nStyptic(lorilyn)\nMonastical(lorilyn)\nAdducent(elden)\nforall x (Cling(x, yonina) and Scare(yonina, lorilyn) -> Scare(lorilyn, yonina))\nforall x (Calcimine(x, lorilyn) -> Calcimine(lorilyn, elden))\nMonastical(elden) and Scare(elden, nahum) -> Cling(nahum, elden)\nforall x (Scare(x, lorilyn) and Barefoot(x) -> Cling(x, lorilyn))\nforall x (Cling(x, nahum) -> Scare(nahum, lorilyn))\nCalcimine(nahum, yonina) -> Calcimine(nahum, lorilyn)\nforall x (Calcimine(x, elden) -> Cling(elden, nahum))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Cling(x, elden) -> Cling(elden, yonina))\n\nnot Styptic(nahum)\n\nnot Styptic(nahum) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The vinod submarine the elena. The ida submarine the donielle. The ida pressurise the vinod. The donielle submarine the elena. The donielle is allusive. The donielle is frenetic. The elena is glaswegian. If something submarine the vinod and the vinod trend the donielle then the donielle trend the vinod. If something pressurise the donielle then the donielle pressurise the elena. If the elena is frenetic and the elena trend the ida then the ida submarine the elena. If something trend the donielle and it is haematal then it submarine the donielle. If something submarine the ida then the ida trend the donielle. If the ida pressurise the vinod then the ida pressurise the donielle. If something pressurise the elena then the elena submarine the ida. If something is haematal and it submarine the elena then the elena submarine the vinod. The elena is allusive.", "logic": "\nSubmarine(vinod, elena)\nSubmarine(ida, donielle)\nPressurise(ida, vinod)\nSubmarine(donielle, elena)\nAllusive(donielle)\nFrenetic(donielle)\nGlaswegian(elena)\nforall x (Submarine(x, vinod) and Trend(vinod, donielle) -> Trend(donielle, vinod))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, donielle) -> Pressurise(donielle, elena))\nFrenetic(elena) and Trend(elena, ida) -> Submarine(ida, elena)\nforall x (Trend(x, donielle) and Haematal(x) -> Submarine(x, donielle))\nforall x (Submarine(x, ida) -> Trend(ida, donielle))\nPressurise(ida, vinod) -> Pressurise(ida, donielle)\nforall x (Pressurise(x, elena) -> Submarine(elena, ida))\nforall x (Haematal(x) and Submarine(x, elena) -> Submarine(elena, vinod))\n\nAllusive(elena)\n\nAllusive(elena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The joleen arbitrate the susanetta. The edna arbitrate the pavel. The edna decry the joleen. The pavel arbitrate the susanetta. The pavel is pyemic. The pavel is palpatory. The susanetta is mournful. If something arbitrate the joleen and the joleen bicycle the pavel then the pavel bicycle the joleen. If something decry the pavel then the pavel decry the susanetta. If the susanetta is palpatory and the susanetta bicycle the edna then the edna arbitrate the susanetta. If something bicycle the pavel and it is burred then it arbitrate the pavel. If something arbitrate the edna then the edna bicycle the pavel. If the edna decry the joleen then the edna decry the pavel. If something decry the susanetta then the susanetta arbitrate the edna. If something is burred and it arbitrate the susanetta then the susanetta arbitrate the joleen. The pavel is not mournful.", "logic": "\nArbitrate(joleen, susanetta)\nArbitrate(edna, pavel)\nDecry(edna, joleen)\nArbitrate(pavel, susanetta)\nPyemic(pavel)\nPalpatory(pavel)\nMournful(susanetta)\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, joleen) and Bicycle(joleen, pavel) -> Bicycle(pavel, joleen))\nforall x (Decry(x, pavel) -> Decry(pavel, susanetta))\nPalpatory(susanetta) and Bicycle(susanetta, edna) -> Arbitrate(edna, susanetta)\nforall x (Bicycle(x, pavel) and Burred(x) -> Arbitrate(x, pavel))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, edna) -> Bicycle(edna, pavel))\nDecry(edna, joleen) -> Decry(edna, pavel)\nforall x (Decry(x, susanetta) -> Arbitrate(susanetta, edna))\nforall x (Burred(x) and Arbitrate(x, susanetta) -> Arbitrate(susanetta, joleen))\n\nnot Mournful(pavel)\n\nnot Mournful(pavel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The gardener respite the noelle. The manda respite the abigael. The manda moisturise the gardener. The abigael respite the noelle. The abigael is fulfilled. The abigael is gimcrack. The noelle is songful. If something respite the gardener and the gardener brisk the abigael then the abigael brisk the gardener. If something moisturise the abigael then the abigael moisturise the noelle. If the noelle is gimcrack and the noelle brisk the manda then the manda respite the noelle. If something brisk the abigael and it is holophytic then it respite the abigael. If something respite the manda then the manda brisk the abigael. If the manda moisturise the gardener then the manda moisturise the abigael. If something moisturise the noelle then the noelle respite the manda. If something is holophytic and it respite the noelle then the noelle respite the gardener. The gardener is holophytic.", "logic": "\nRespite(gardener, noelle)\nRespite(manda, abigael)\nMoisturise(manda, gardener)\nRespite(abigael, noelle)\nFulfilled(abigael)\nGimcrack(abigael)\nSongful(noelle)\nforall x (Respite(x, gardener) and Brisk(gardener, abigael) -> Brisk(abigael, gardener))\nforall x (Moisturise(x, abigael) -> Moisturise(abigael, noelle))\nGimcrack(noelle) and Brisk(noelle, manda) -> Respite(manda, noelle)\nforall x (Brisk(x, abigael) and Holophytic(x) -> Respite(x, abigael))\nforall x (Respite(x, manda) -> Brisk(manda, abigael))\nMoisturise(manda, gardener) -> Moisturise(manda, abigael)\nforall x (Moisturise(x, noelle) -> Respite(noelle, manda))\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Respite(x, noelle) -> Respite(noelle, gardener))\n\nHolophytic(gardener)\n\nHolophytic(gardener) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "Nathanial is paltry. Nathanial is bovid. Nathanial is bicolored. If Nathanial is paltry and Nathanial is acidulent then Nathanial is amylaceous. All bicolored, bovid things are unmanlike. Nice things are acidulent. Nathanial is bicolored.", "logic": "\nPaltry(nathanial)\nBovid(nathanial)\nBicolored(nathanial)\nPaltry(nathanial) and Acidulent(nathanial) -> Amylaceous(nathanial)\nforall x (Bicolored(x) and Bovid(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) -> Acidulent(x))\n\nBicolored(nathanial)\n\ntherefore Bicolored(nathanial)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Katina is undetected. Katina is potbound. Katina is unkempt. If Katina is undetected and Katina is sacculate then Katina is ownerless. All unkempt, potbound things are moralistic. Nice things are sacculate. Katina is not unkempt.", "logic": "\nUndetected(katina)\nPotbound(katina)\nUnkempt(katina)\nUndetected(katina) and Sacculate(katina) -> Ownerless(katina)\nforall x (Unkempt(x) and Potbound(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Sacculate(x))\n\nnot Unkempt(katina)\n\ntherefore Unkempt(katina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Rayner is chinese. Rayner is philatelic. Rayner is adpressed. If Rayner is chinese and Rayner is spent then Rayner is wimpy. All adpressed, philatelic things are mozartean. Nice things are spent. Rayner is mozartean.", "logic": "\nChinese(rayner)\nPhilatelic(rayner)\nAdpressed(rayner)\nChinese(rayner) and Spent(rayner) -> Wimpy(rayner)\nforall x (Adpressed(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Mozartean(x))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) -> Spent(x))\n\nMozartean(rayner)\n\nAdpressed(rayner) and Philatelic(rayner) and forall x (Adpressed(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Mozartean(x)) -> therefore Mozartean(rayner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Chrystel is siamese. Chrystel is disrupted. Chrystel is methodist. If Chrystel is siamese and Chrystel is conjugal then Chrystel is fluky. All methodist, disrupted things are amatory. Nice things are conjugal. Chrystel is not amatory.", "logic": "\nSiamese(chrystel)\nDisrupted(chrystel)\nMethodist(chrystel)\nSiamese(chrystel) and Conjugal(chrystel) -> Fluky(chrystel)\nforall x (Methodist(x) and Disrupted(x) -> Amatory(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Conjugal(x))\n\nnot Amatory(chrystel)\n\nMethodist(chrystel) and Disrupted(chrystel) and forall x (Methodist(x) and Disrupted(x) -> Amatory(x)) -> therefore Amatory(chrystel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Kathryn is stalemated. Kathryn is dionysian. Kathryn is pokey. If Kathryn is stalemated and Kathryn is bally then Kathryn is cislunar. All pokey, dionysian things are tropical. Nice things are bally. Kathryn is bally.", "logic": "\nStalemated(kathryn)\nDionysian(kathryn)\nPokey(kathryn)\nStalemated(kathryn) and Bally(kathryn) -> Cislunar(kathryn)\nforall x (Pokey(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Tropical(x))\nforall x (Tropical(x) -> Bally(x))\n\nBally(kathryn)\n\nPokey(kathryn) and Dionysian(kathryn) and forall x (Pokey(x) and Dionysian(x) -> Tropical(x)) -> therefore Tropical(kathryn) Tropical(kathryn) and forall x (Tropical(x) -> Bally(x)) -> therefore Bally(kathryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Ophelie is murdered. Ophelie is pedigreed. Ophelie is mini. If Ophelie is murdered and Ophelie is redeeming then Ophelie is striate. All mini, pedigreed things are myelic. Nice things are redeeming. Ophelie is not redeeming.", "logic": "\nMurdered(ophelie)\nPedigreed(ophelie)\nMini(ophelie)\nMurdered(ophelie) and Redeeming(ophelie) -> Striate(ophelie)\nforall x (Mini(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> Myelic(x))\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Redeeming(x))\n\nnot Redeeming(ophelie)\n\nMini(ophelie) and Pedigreed(ophelie) and forall x (Mini(x) and Pedigreed(x) -> Myelic(x)) -> therefore Myelic(ophelie) Myelic(ophelie) and forall x (Myelic(x) -> Redeeming(x)) -> therefore Redeeming(ophelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Charyl is prandial. Charyl is detersive. Charyl is bathyal. If Charyl is prandial and Charyl is digital then Charyl is bindable. All bathyal, detersive things are elastic. Nice things are digital. Charyl is bindable.", "logic": "\nPrandial(charyl)\nDetersive(charyl)\nBathyal(charyl)\nPrandial(charyl) and Digital(charyl) -> Bindable(charyl)\nforall x (Bathyal(x) and Detersive(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Digital(x))\n\nBindable(charyl)\n\nBathyal(charyl) and Detersive(charyl) and forall x (Bathyal(x) and Detersive(x) -> Elastic(x)) -> therefore Elastic(charyl) Elastic(charyl) and forall x (Elastic(x) -> Digital(x)) -> therefore Digital(charyl) Prandial(charyl) and Digital(charyl) and Prandial(charyl) and Digital(charyl) -> Bindable(charyl) -> therefore Bindable(charyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Anni is pernicious. Anni is untaxed. Anni is igneous. If Anni is pernicious and Anni is untasted then Anni is katari. All igneous, untaxed things are intoxicant. Nice things are untasted. Anni is not katari.", "logic": "\nPernicious(anni)\nUntaxed(anni)\nIgneous(anni)\nPernicious(anni) and Untasted(anni) -> Katari(anni)\nforall x (Igneous(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Intoxicant(x))\nforall x (Intoxicant(x) -> Untasted(x))\n\nnot Katari(anni)\n\nIgneous(anni) and Untaxed(anni) and forall x (Igneous(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Intoxicant(x)) -> therefore Intoxicant(anni) Intoxicant(anni) and forall x (Intoxicant(x) -> Untasted(x)) -> therefore Untasted(anni) Pernicious(anni) and Untasted(anni) and Pernicious(anni) and Untasted(anni) -> Katari(anni) -> therefore Katari(anni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Luelle is germfree. Luelle is barbellate. Luelle is subsidised. Marcille is cheap. Marcille is hatched. Marcille is barbellate. Marcille is subsidised. Stormie is germfree. Stormie is expensive. Stormie is not cheap. Stormie is barbellate. Fanchette is roman. Fanchette is expensive. Fanchette is not cheap. Fanchette is hatched. Fanchette is barbellate. If someone is roman and subsidised then they are expensive. If Stormie is subsidised and Stormie is not cheap then Stormie is barbellate. If someone is cheap then they are germfree. All barbellate people are germfree. If someone is germfree and expensive then they are hatched. White, barbellate people are roman. Marcille is cheap.", "logic": "\nGermfree(luelle)\nBarbellate(luelle)\nSubsidised(luelle)\nCheap(marcille)\nHatched(marcille)\nBarbellate(marcille)\nSubsidised(marcille)\nGermfree(stormie)\nExpensive(stormie)\nnot Cheap(stormie)\nBarbellate(stormie)\nRoman(fanchette)\nExpensive(fanchette)\nnot Cheap(fanchette)\nHatched(fanchette)\nBarbellate(fanchette)\nforall x (Roman(x) and Subsidised(x) -> Expensive(x))\nSubsidised(stormie) and not Cheap(stormie) -> Barbellate(stormie)\nforall x (Cheap(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) and Expensive(x) -> Hatched(x))\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Barbellate(x) -> Roman(x))\n\nCheap(marcille)\n\ntherefore Cheap(marcille)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Susan is rearward. Susan is kosher. Susan is tonal. Nevil is scrubbed. Nevil is microsomal. Nevil is kosher. Nevil is tonal. Judye is rearward. Judye is downstream. Judye is not scrubbed. Judye is kosher. Lotti is fleeting. Lotti is downstream. Lotti is not scrubbed. Lotti is microsomal. Lotti is kosher. If someone is fleeting and tonal then they are downstream. If Judye is tonal and Judye is not scrubbed then Judye is kosher. If someone is scrubbed then they are rearward. All kosher people are rearward. If someone is rearward and downstream then they are microsomal. White, kosher people are fleeting. Lotti is scrubbed.", "logic": "\nRearward(susan)\nKosher(susan)\nTonal(susan)\nScrubbed(nevil)\nMicrosomal(nevil)\nKosher(nevil)\nTonal(nevil)\nRearward(judye)\nDownstream(judye)\nnot Scrubbed(judye)\nKosher(judye)\nFleeting(lotti)\nDownstream(lotti)\nnot Scrubbed(lotti)\nMicrosomal(lotti)\nKosher(lotti)\nforall x (Fleeting(x) and Tonal(x) -> Downstream(x))\nTonal(judye) and not Scrubbed(judye) -> Kosher(judye)\nforall x (Scrubbed(x) -> Rearward(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Rearward(x))\nforall x (Rearward(x) and Downstream(x) -> Microsomal(x))\nforall x (Tonal(x) and Kosher(x) -> Fleeting(x))\n\nScrubbed(lotti)\n\ntherefore not Scrubbed(lotti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Chester is straining. Chester is savoury. Chester is emaciated. Merralee is tied. Merralee is velar. Merralee is savoury. Merralee is emaciated. Morse is straining. Morse is intrusive. Morse is not tied. Morse is savoury. Zared is unifoliate. Zared is intrusive. Zared is not tied. Zared is velar. Zared is savoury. If someone is unifoliate and emaciated then they are intrusive. If Morse is emaciated and Morse is not tied then Morse is savoury. If someone is tied then they are straining. All savoury people are straining. If someone is straining and intrusive then they are velar. White, savoury people are unifoliate. Chester is unifoliate.", "logic": "\nStraining(chester)\nSavoury(chester)\nEmaciated(chester)\nTied(merralee)\nVelar(merralee)\nSavoury(merralee)\nEmaciated(merralee)\nStraining(morse)\nIntrusive(morse)\nnot Tied(morse)\nSavoury(morse)\nUnifoliate(zared)\nIntrusive(zared)\nnot Tied(zared)\nVelar(zared)\nSavoury(zared)\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) and Emaciated(x) -> Intrusive(x))\nEmaciated(morse) and not Tied(morse) -> Savoury(morse)\nforall x (Tied(x) -> Straining(x))\nforall x (Savoury(x) -> Straining(x))\nforall x (Straining(x) and Intrusive(x) -> Velar(x))\nforall x (Emaciated(x) and Savoury(x) -> Unifoliate(x))\n\nUnifoliate(chester)\n\nEmaciated(chester) and Savoury(chester) and forall x (Emaciated(x) and Savoury(x) -> Unifoliate(x)) -> therefore Unifoliate(chester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Roderigo is transposed. Roderigo is swayback. Roderigo is rutted. Maible is snuffly. Maible is parabolic. Maible is swayback. Maible is rutted. Hassan is transposed. Hassan is maculate. Hassan is not snuffly. Hassan is swayback. Melvin is catchpenny. Melvin is maculate. Melvin is not snuffly. Melvin is parabolic. Melvin is swayback. If someone is catchpenny and rutted then they are maculate. If Hassan is rutted and Hassan is not snuffly then Hassan is swayback. If someone is snuffly then they are transposed. All swayback people are transposed. If someone is transposed and maculate then they are parabolic. White, swayback people are catchpenny. Maible is not transposed.", "logic": "\nTransposed(roderigo)\nSwayback(roderigo)\nRutted(roderigo)\nSnuffly(maible)\nParabolic(maible)\nSwayback(maible)\nRutted(maible)\nTransposed(hassan)\nMaculate(hassan)\nnot Snuffly(hassan)\nSwayback(hassan)\nCatchpenny(melvin)\nMaculate(melvin)\nnot Snuffly(melvin)\nParabolic(melvin)\nSwayback(melvin)\nforall x (Catchpenny(x) and Rutted(x) -> Maculate(x))\nRutted(hassan) and not Snuffly(hassan) -> Swayback(hassan)\nforall x (Snuffly(x) -> Transposed(x))\nforall x (Swayback(x) -> Transposed(x))\nforall x (Transposed(x) and Maculate(x) -> Parabolic(x))\nforall x (Rutted(x) and Swayback(x) -> Catchpenny(x))\n\nnot Transposed(maible)\n\nSnuffly(maible) and forall x (Snuffly(x) -> Transposed(x)) -> therefore Transposed(maible)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Thor is deaf. Thor is cadent. Thor is drastic. Zandra is unsighted. Zandra is caulked. Zandra is cadent. Zandra is drastic. Lazar is deaf. Lazar is inexpert. Lazar is not unsighted. Lazar is cadent. Dacy is darkened. Dacy is inexpert. Dacy is not unsighted. Dacy is caulked. Dacy is cadent. If someone is darkened and drastic then they are inexpert. If Lazar is drastic and Lazar is not unsighted then Lazar is cadent. If someone is unsighted then they are deaf. All cadent people are deaf. If someone is deaf and inexpert then they are caulked. White, cadent people are darkened. Thor is inexpert.", "logic": "\nDeaf(thor)\nCadent(thor)\nDrastic(thor)\nUnsighted(zandra)\nCaulked(zandra)\nCadent(zandra)\nDrastic(zandra)\nDeaf(lazar)\nInexpert(lazar)\nnot Unsighted(lazar)\nCadent(lazar)\nDarkened(dacy)\nInexpert(dacy)\nnot Unsighted(dacy)\nCaulked(dacy)\nCadent(dacy)\nforall x (Darkened(x) and Drastic(x) -> Inexpert(x))\nDrastic(lazar) and not Unsighted(lazar) -> Cadent(lazar)\nforall x (Unsighted(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Cadent(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) and Inexpert(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Drastic(x) and Cadent(x) -> Darkened(x))\n\nInexpert(thor)\n\nDrastic(thor) and Cadent(thor) and forall x (Drastic(x) and Cadent(x) -> Darkened(x)) -> therefore Darkened(thor) Darkened(thor) and Drastic(thor) and forall x (Darkened(x) and Drastic(x) -> Inexpert(x)) -> therefore Inexpert(thor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Aurora is cercarial. Aurora is unstained. Aurora is buried. Alfonzo is binary. Alfonzo is thriving. Alfonzo is unstained. Alfonzo is buried. Carter is cercarial. Carter is eventual. Carter is not binary. Carter is unstained. Corrie is color. Corrie is eventual. Corrie is not binary. Corrie is thriving. Corrie is unstained. If someone is color and buried then they are eventual. If Carter is buried and Carter is not binary then Carter is unstained. If someone is binary then they are cercarial. All unstained people are cercarial. If someone is cercarial and eventual then they are thriving. White, unstained people are color. Aurora is not eventual.", "logic": "\nCercarial(aurora)\nUnstained(aurora)\nBuried(aurora)\nBinary(alfonzo)\nThriving(alfonzo)\nUnstained(alfonzo)\nBuried(alfonzo)\nCercarial(carter)\nEventual(carter)\nnot Binary(carter)\nUnstained(carter)\nColor(corrie)\nEventual(corrie)\nnot Binary(corrie)\nThriving(corrie)\nUnstained(corrie)\nforall x (Color(x) and Buried(x) -> Eventual(x))\nBuried(carter) and not Binary(carter) -> Unstained(carter)\nforall x (Binary(x) -> Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Unstained(x) -> Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Cercarial(x) and Eventual(x) -> Thriving(x))\nforall x (Buried(x) and Unstained(x) -> Color(x))\n\nnot Eventual(aurora)\n\nBuried(aurora) and Unstained(aurora) and forall x (Buried(x) and Unstained(x) -> Color(x)) -> therefore Color(aurora) Color(aurora) and Buried(aurora) and forall x (Color(x) and Buried(x) -> Eventual(x)) -> therefore Eventual(aurora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Una is monogynous. Una is faineant. Una is positional. Ediva is sprightly. Ediva is twopenny. Ediva is faineant. Ediva is positional. Paton is monogynous. Paton is orgiastic. Paton is not sprightly. Paton is faineant. Charlean is bushy. Charlean is orgiastic. Charlean is not sprightly. Charlean is twopenny. Charlean is faineant. If someone is bushy and positional then they are orgiastic. If Paton is positional and Paton is not sprightly then Paton is faineant. If someone is sprightly then they are monogynous. All faineant people are monogynous. If someone is monogynous and orgiastic then they are twopenny. White, faineant people are bushy. Una is twopenny.", "logic": "\nMonogynous(una)\nFaineant(una)\nPositional(una)\nSprightly(ediva)\nTwopenny(ediva)\nFaineant(ediva)\nPositional(ediva)\nMonogynous(paton)\nOrgiastic(paton)\nnot Sprightly(paton)\nFaineant(paton)\nBushy(charlean)\nOrgiastic(charlean)\nnot Sprightly(charlean)\nTwopenny(charlean)\nFaineant(charlean)\nforall x (Bushy(x) and Positional(x) -> Orgiastic(x))\nPositional(paton) and not Sprightly(paton) -> Faineant(paton)\nforall x (Sprightly(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nforall x (Faineant(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) and Orgiastic(x) -> Twopenny(x))\nforall x (Positional(x) and Faineant(x) -> Bushy(x))\n\nTwopenny(una)\n\nPositional(una) and Faineant(una) and forall x (Positional(x) and Faineant(x) -> Bushy(x)) -> therefore Bushy(una) Bushy(una) and Positional(una) and forall x (Bushy(x) and Positional(x) -> Orgiastic(x)) -> therefore Orgiastic(una) Monogynous(una) and Orgiastic(una) and forall x (Monogynous(x) and Orgiastic(x) -> Twopenny(x)) -> therefore Twopenny(una)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Nita is thwartwise. Nita is allogeneic. Nita is unlaureled. Karlee is injectable. Karlee is bally. Karlee is allogeneic. Karlee is unlaureled. Christoph is thwartwise. Christoph is weeklong. Christoph is not injectable. Christoph is allogeneic. Marcelo is parallel. Marcelo is weeklong. Marcelo is not injectable. Marcelo is bally. Marcelo is allogeneic. If someone is parallel and unlaureled then they are weeklong. If Christoph is unlaureled and Christoph is not injectable then Christoph is allogeneic. If someone is injectable then they are thwartwise. All allogeneic people are thwartwise. If someone is thwartwise and weeklong then they are bally. White, allogeneic people are parallel. Nita is not bally.", "logic": "\nThwartwise(nita)\nAllogeneic(nita)\nUnlaureled(nita)\nInjectable(karlee)\nBally(karlee)\nAllogeneic(karlee)\nUnlaureled(karlee)\nThwartwise(christoph)\nWeeklong(christoph)\nnot Injectable(christoph)\nAllogeneic(christoph)\nParallel(marcelo)\nWeeklong(marcelo)\nnot Injectable(marcelo)\nBally(marcelo)\nAllogeneic(marcelo)\nforall x (Parallel(x) and Unlaureled(x) -> Weeklong(x))\nUnlaureled(christoph) and not Injectable(christoph) -> Allogeneic(christoph)\nforall x (Injectable(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Thwartwise(x) and Weeklong(x) -> Bally(x))\nforall x (Unlaureled(x) and Allogeneic(x) -> Parallel(x))\n\nnot Bally(nita)\n\nUnlaureled(nita) and Allogeneic(nita) and forall x (Unlaureled(x) and Allogeneic(x) -> Parallel(x)) -> therefore Parallel(nita) Parallel(nita) and Unlaureled(nita) and forall x (Parallel(x) and Unlaureled(x) -> Weeklong(x)) -> therefore Weeklong(nita) Thwartwise(nita) and Weeklong(nita) and forall x (Thwartwise(x) and Weeklong(x) -> Bally(x)) -> therefore Bally(nita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Kristal is beery. Kristal is disloyal. Kristal is furrowed. Ketti is glomerular. Ketti is livable. Ketti is disloyal. Ketti is furrowed. Issie is beery. Issie is refreshed. Issie is not glomerular. Issie is disloyal. Nydia is alienable. Nydia is refreshed. Nydia is not glomerular. Nydia is livable. Nydia is disloyal. If someone is alienable and furrowed then they are refreshed. If Issie is furrowed and Issie is not glomerular then Issie is disloyal. If someone is glomerular then they are beery. All disloyal people are beery. If someone is beery and refreshed then they are livable. White, disloyal people are alienable. Issie is not alienable.", "logic": "\nBeery(kristal)\nDisloyal(kristal)\nFurrowed(kristal)\nGlomerular(ketti)\nLivable(ketti)\nDisloyal(ketti)\nFurrowed(ketti)\nBeery(issie)\nRefreshed(issie)\nnot Glomerular(issie)\nDisloyal(issie)\nAlienable(nydia)\nRefreshed(nydia)\nnot Glomerular(nydia)\nLivable(nydia)\nDisloyal(nydia)\nforall x (Alienable(x) and Furrowed(x) -> Refreshed(x))\nFurrowed(issie) and not Glomerular(issie) -> Disloyal(issie)\nforall x (Glomerular(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Disloyal(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) and Refreshed(x) -> Livable(x))\nforall x (Furrowed(x) and Disloyal(x) -> Alienable(x))\n\nnot Alienable(issie)\n\nforall x (Furrowed(x) and Disloyal(x) -> Alienable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Sutton is unwounded. Sutton is sandpapery. Sutton is nonviscid. Bernadene is futile. Bernadene is jumbo. Bernadene is sandpapery. Bernadene is nonviscid. Veronica is unwounded. Veronica is cadenced. Veronica is not futile. Veronica is sandpapery. Lucie is amiss. Lucie is cadenced. Lucie is not futile. Lucie is jumbo. Lucie is sandpapery. If someone is amiss and nonviscid then they are cadenced. If Veronica is nonviscid and Veronica is not futile then Veronica is sandpapery. If someone is futile then they are unwounded. All sandpapery people are unwounded. If someone is unwounded and cadenced then they are jumbo. White, sandpapery people are amiss. Veronica is nonviscid.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(sutton)\nSandpapery(sutton)\nNonviscid(sutton)\nFutile(bernadene)\nJumbo(bernadene)\nSandpapery(bernadene)\nNonviscid(bernadene)\nUnwounded(veronica)\nCadenced(veronica)\nnot Futile(veronica)\nSandpapery(veronica)\nAmiss(lucie)\nCadenced(lucie)\nnot Futile(lucie)\nJumbo(lucie)\nSandpapery(lucie)\nforall x (Amiss(x) and Nonviscid(x) -> Cadenced(x))\nNonviscid(veronica) and not Futile(veronica) -> Sandpapery(veronica)\nforall x (Futile(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) and Cadenced(x) -> Jumbo(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) and Sandpapery(x) -> Amiss(x))\n\nNonviscid(veronica)\n\nNonviscid(veronica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Viki is edifying. Viki is unmanly. Viki is poky. Donn is believable. Donn is overcast. Donn is unmanly. Donn is poky. Yonina is edifying. Yonina is stunning. Yonina is not believable. Yonina is unmanly. Pearl is apocryphal. Pearl is stunning. Pearl is not believable. Pearl is overcast. Pearl is unmanly. If someone is apocryphal and poky then they are stunning. If Yonina is poky and Yonina is not believable then Yonina is unmanly. If someone is believable then they are edifying. All unmanly people are edifying. If someone is edifying and stunning then they are overcast. White, unmanly people are apocryphal. Viki is not believable.", "logic": "\nEdifying(viki)\nUnmanly(viki)\nPoky(viki)\nBelievable(donn)\nOvercast(donn)\nUnmanly(donn)\nPoky(donn)\nEdifying(yonina)\nStunning(yonina)\nnot Believable(yonina)\nUnmanly(yonina)\nApocryphal(pearl)\nStunning(pearl)\nnot Believable(pearl)\nOvercast(pearl)\nUnmanly(pearl)\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and Poky(x) -> Stunning(x))\nPoky(yonina) and not Believable(yonina) -> Unmanly(yonina)\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Unmanly(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) and Stunning(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Poky(x) and Unmanly(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\n\nnot Believable(viki)\n\nnot Believable(viki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Aleecia is psychic. Aleecia is said. Aleecia is tricuspid. Hakim is impaired. Hakim is majuscule. Hakim is said. Hakim is tricuspid. Jeanne is psychic. Jeanne is interwoven. Jeanne is not impaired. Jeanne is said. Berk is idiomatic. Berk is interwoven. Berk is not impaired. Berk is majuscule. Berk is said. If someone is idiomatic and tricuspid then they are interwoven. If Jeanne is tricuspid and Jeanne is not impaired then Jeanne is said. If someone is impaired then they are psychic. All said people are psychic. If someone is psychic and interwoven then they are majuscule. White, said people are idiomatic. Berk is tricuspid.", "logic": "\nPsychic(aleecia)\nSaid(aleecia)\nTricuspid(aleecia)\nImpaired(hakim)\nMajuscule(hakim)\nSaid(hakim)\nTricuspid(hakim)\nPsychic(jeanne)\nInterwoven(jeanne)\nnot Impaired(jeanne)\nSaid(jeanne)\nIdiomatic(berk)\nInterwoven(berk)\nnot Impaired(berk)\nMajuscule(berk)\nSaid(berk)\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) and Tricuspid(x) -> Interwoven(x))\nTricuspid(jeanne) and not Impaired(jeanne) -> Said(jeanne)\nforall x (Impaired(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Psychic(x) and Interwoven(x) -> Majuscule(x))\nforall x (Tricuspid(x) and Said(x) -> Idiomatic(x))\n\nTricuspid(berk)\n\nTricuspid(berk) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-419"} {"premises": "Francisco is spheric. Junina is unequipped. Lurette is appeasing. Rufus is inodorous. All koranic things are unequipped. Blue, exempt things are inodorous. If something is regal then it is koranic. All regal, exempt things are koranic. Cold things are regal. If Francisco is koranic then Francisco is appeasing. Rufus is inodorous.", "logic": "\nSpheric(francisco)\nUnequipped(junina)\nAppeasing(lurette)\nInodorous(rufus)\nforall x (Koranic(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Appeasing(x) and Exempt(x) -> Inodorous(x))\nforall x (Regal(x) -> Koranic(x))\nforall x (Regal(x) and Exempt(x) -> Koranic(x))\nforall x (Spheric(x) -> Regal(x))\nKoranic(francisco) -> Appeasing(francisco)\n\nInodorous(rufus)\n\ntherefore Inodorous(rufus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Alidia is medullated. Linzy is corny. Shannon is lessened. Lauraine is topped. All dirigible things are corny. Blue, basidial things are topped. If something is antitrust then it is dirigible. All antitrust, basidial things are dirigible. Cold things are antitrust. If Alidia is dirigible then Alidia is lessened. Lauraine is not topped.", "logic": "\nMedullated(alidia)\nCorny(linzy)\nLessened(shannon)\nTopped(lauraine)\nforall x (Dirigible(x) -> Corny(x))\nforall x (Lessened(x) and Basidial(x) -> Topped(x))\nforall x (Antitrust(x) -> Dirigible(x))\nforall x (Antitrust(x) and Basidial(x) -> Dirigible(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nDirigible(alidia) -> Lessened(alidia)\n\nnot Topped(lauraine)\n\ntherefore Topped(lauraine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Dianne is cycloidal. Olva is loath. Elena is bloody. Myles is fortuitous. All insolvent things are loath. Blue, unwitting things are fortuitous. If something is focussed then it is insolvent. All focussed, unwitting things are insolvent. Cold things are focussed. If Dianne is insolvent then Dianne is bloody. Dianne is focussed.", "logic": "\nCycloidal(dianne)\nLoath(olva)\nBloody(elena)\nFortuitous(myles)\nforall x (Insolvent(x) -> Loath(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and Unwitting(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nforall x (Focussed(x) -> Insolvent(x))\nforall x (Focussed(x) and Unwitting(x) -> Insolvent(x))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) -> Focussed(x))\nInsolvent(dianne) -> Bloody(dianne)\n\nFocussed(dianne)\n\nCycloidal(dianne) and forall x (Cycloidal(x) -> Focussed(x)) -> therefore Focussed(dianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Natale is lissom. Marcelo is visionary. Cristina is extravert. Aub is unsexed. All mustached things are visionary. Blue, unended things are unsexed. If something is persian then it is mustached. All persian, unended things are mustached. Cold things are persian. If Natale is mustached then Natale is extravert. Natale is not persian.", "logic": "\nLissom(natale)\nVisionary(marcelo)\nExtravert(cristina)\nUnsexed(aub)\nforall x (Mustached(x) -> Visionary(x))\nforall x (Extravert(x) and Unended(x) -> Unsexed(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) -> Mustached(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) and Unended(x) -> Mustached(x))\nforall x (Lissom(x) -> Persian(x))\nMustached(natale) -> Extravert(natale)\n\nnot Persian(natale)\n\nLissom(natale) and forall x (Lissom(x) -> Persian(x)) -> therefore Persian(natale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Conway is horary. Aurore is uncreative. Zechariah is wayfaring. Noellyn is swinish. All blueish things are uncreative. Blue, caucasoid things are swinish. If something is sugary then it is blueish. All sugary, caucasoid things are blueish. Cold things are sugary. If Conway is blueish then Conway is wayfaring. Conway is blueish.", "logic": "\nHorary(conway)\nUncreative(aurore)\nWayfaring(zechariah)\nSwinish(noellyn)\nforall x (Blueish(x) -> Uncreative(x))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) and Caucasoid(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Sugary(x) -> Blueish(x))\nforall x (Sugary(x) and Caucasoid(x) -> Blueish(x))\nforall x (Horary(x) -> Sugary(x))\nBlueish(conway) -> Wayfaring(conway)\n\nBlueish(conway)\n\nHorary(conway) and forall x (Horary(x) -> Sugary(x)) -> therefore Sugary(conway) Sugary(conway) and forall x (Sugary(x) -> Blueish(x)) -> therefore Blueish(conway)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Lorita is unclear. Quintana is epistolary. Mame is redemptive. Blaire is sticky. All stocky things are epistolary. Blue, aeolian things are sticky. If something is cockney then it is stocky. All cockney, aeolian things are stocky. Cold things are cockney. If Lorita is stocky then Lorita is redemptive. Lorita is not stocky.", "logic": "\nUnclear(lorita)\nEpistolary(quintana)\nRedemptive(mame)\nSticky(blaire)\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> Epistolary(x))\nforall x (Redemptive(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Sticky(x))\nforall x (Cockney(x) -> Stocky(x))\nforall x (Cockney(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Stocky(x))\nforall x (Unclear(x) -> Cockney(x))\nStocky(lorita) -> Redemptive(lorita)\n\nnot Stocky(lorita)\n\nUnclear(lorita) and forall x (Unclear(x) -> Cockney(x)) -> therefore Cockney(lorita) Cockney(lorita) and forall x (Cockney(x) -> Stocky(x)) -> therefore Stocky(lorita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Keenan is ghanaian. Zorana is nescient. Torie is ominous. Tami is stiff. All frore things are nescient. Blue, passerine things are stiff. If something is employed then it is frore. All employed, passerine things are frore. Cold things are employed. If Keenan is frore then Keenan is ominous. Keenan is nescient.", "logic": "\nGhanaian(keenan)\nNescient(zorana)\nOminous(torie)\nStiff(tami)\nforall x (Frore(x) -> Nescient(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Passerine(x) -> Stiff(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) -> Frore(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) and Passerine(x) -> Frore(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Employed(x))\nFrore(keenan) -> Ominous(keenan)\n\nNescient(keenan)\n\nGhanaian(keenan) and forall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Employed(x)) -> therefore Employed(keenan) Employed(keenan) and forall x (Employed(x) -> Frore(x)) -> therefore Frore(keenan) Frore(keenan) and forall x (Frore(x) -> Nescient(x)) -> therefore Nescient(keenan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Zeke is shared. Leonore is notable. Luce is submissive. Wojciech is absolutist. All evocative things are notable. Blue, peaceful things are absolutist. If something is pervious then it is evocative. All pervious, peaceful things are evocative. Cold things are pervious. If Zeke is evocative then Zeke is submissive. Zeke is not submissive.", "logic": "\nShared(zeke)\nNotable(leonore)\nSubmissive(luce)\nAbsolutist(wojciech)\nforall x (Evocative(x) -> Notable(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Peaceful(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Pervious(x) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Pervious(x) and Peaceful(x) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) -> Pervious(x))\nEvocative(zeke) -> Submissive(zeke)\n\nnot Submissive(zeke)\n\nShared(zeke) and forall x (Shared(x) -> Pervious(x)) -> therefore Pervious(zeke) Pervious(zeke) and forall x (Pervious(x) -> Evocative(x)) -> therefore Evocative(zeke) Evocative(zeke) and Evocative(zeke) -> Submissive(zeke) -> therefore Submissive(zeke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Christen is attacking. Arda is windless. Johnnie is hueless. Malory is unlatched. All copacetic things are windless. Blue, ghostly things are unlatched. If something is stupendous then it is copacetic. All stupendous, ghostly things are copacetic. Cold things are stupendous. If Christen is copacetic then Christen is hueless. Johnnie is not copacetic.", "logic": "\nAttacking(christen)\nWindless(arda)\nHueless(johnnie)\nUnlatched(malory)\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Windless(x))\nforall x (Hueless(x) and Ghostly(x) -> Unlatched(x))\nforall x (Stupendous(x) -> Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Stupendous(x) and Ghostly(x) -> Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) -> Stupendous(x))\nCopacetic(christen) -> Hueless(christen)\n\nnot Copacetic(johnnie)\n\nforall x (Stupendous(x) -> Copacetic(x)) <- forall x (Attacking(x) -> Stupendous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Doe is overgreedy. Renado is wrongful. Seamus is hyaloid. Jerrine is insurgent. All raisable things are wrongful. Blue, tracheal things are insurgent. If something is attenuated then it is raisable. All attenuated, tracheal things are raisable. Cold things are attenuated. If Doe is raisable then Doe is hyaloid. Jerrine is raisable.", "logic": "\nOvergreedy(doe)\nWrongful(renado)\nHyaloid(seamus)\nInsurgent(jerrine)\nforall x (Raisable(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Tracheal(x) -> Insurgent(x))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> Raisable(x))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) and Tracheal(x) -> Raisable(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Attenuated(x))\nRaisable(doe) -> Hyaloid(doe)\n\nRaisable(jerrine)\n\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> Raisable(x)) <- forall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Attenuated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Larine is idyllic. Gaby is laciniate. Rustie is fighting. Meris is plumy. All splintery things are laciniate. Blue, banded things are plumy. If something is vile then it is splintery. All vile, banded things are splintery. Cold things are vile. If Larine is splintery then Larine is fighting. Larine is not plumy.", "logic": "\nIdyllic(larine)\nLaciniate(gaby)\nFighting(rustie)\nPlumy(meris)\nforall x (Splintery(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) and Banded(x) -> Plumy(x))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> Splintery(x))\nforall x (Vile(x) and Banded(x) -> Splintery(x))\nforall x (Idyllic(x) -> Vile(x))\nSplintery(larine) -> Fighting(larine)\n\nnot Plumy(larine)\n\nforall x (Fighting(x) and Banded(x) -> Plumy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Elbertina is unbaptised. Wayland is masterly. Sallyann is unified. Shoshana is bass. All adductive things are masterly. Blue, bandy things are bass. If something is noble then it is adductive. All noble, bandy things are adductive. Cold things are noble. If Elbertina is adductive then Elbertina is unified. Wayland is adductive.", "logic": "\nUnbaptised(elbertina)\nMasterly(wayland)\nUnified(sallyann)\nBass(shoshana)\nforall x (Adductive(x) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Unified(x) and Bandy(x) -> Bass(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Adductive(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) and Bandy(x) -> Adductive(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Noble(x))\nAdductive(elbertina) -> Unified(elbertina)\n\nAdductive(wayland)\n\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Adductive(x)) <- forall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Noble(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Tammy is collective. Guillaume is crumbly. Bart is autogenous. Sybila is entrenched. All cinnabar things are crumbly. Blue, profitable things are entrenched. If something is boxy then it is cinnabar. All boxy, profitable things are cinnabar. Cold things are boxy. If Tammy is cinnabar then Tammy is autogenous. Sybila is not collective.", "logic": "\nCollective(tammy)\nCrumbly(guillaume)\nAutogenous(bart)\nEntrenched(sybila)\nforall x (Cinnabar(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nforall x (Autogenous(x) and Profitable(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Cinnabar(x))\nforall x (Boxy(x) and Profitable(x) -> Cinnabar(x))\nforall x (Collective(x) -> Boxy(x))\nCinnabar(tammy) -> Autogenous(tammy)\n\nnot Collective(sybila)\n\nnot Collective(sybila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Vanya is malayan. Matt is imperial. Marietta is retroflex. Tansy is confutable. All scoreless things are imperial. Blue, bookable things are confutable. If something is preclusive then it is scoreless. All preclusive, bookable things are scoreless. Cold things are preclusive. If Vanya is scoreless then Vanya is retroflex. Marietta is malayan.", "logic": "\nMalayan(vanya)\nImperial(matt)\nRetroflex(marietta)\nConfutable(tansy)\nforall x (Scoreless(x) -> Imperial(x))\nforall x (Retroflex(x) and Bookable(x) -> Confutable(x))\nforall x (Preclusive(x) -> Scoreless(x))\nforall x (Preclusive(x) and Bookable(x) -> Scoreless(x))\nforall x (Malayan(x) -> Preclusive(x))\nScoreless(vanya) -> Retroflex(vanya)\n\nMalayan(marietta)\n\nMalayan(marietta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Tatum is bacchanal. Antonella is elemental. Darb is premium. Mollie is astragalar. All smashing things are elemental. Blue, ungodly things are astragalar. If something is august then it is smashing. All august, ungodly things are smashing. Cold things are august. If Tatum is smashing then Tatum is premium. Antonella is not ungodly.", "logic": "\nBacchanal(tatum)\nElemental(antonella)\nPremium(darb)\nAstragalar(mollie)\nforall x (Smashing(x) -> Elemental(x))\nforall x (Premium(x) and Ungodly(x) -> Astragalar(x))\nforall x (August(x) -> Smashing(x))\nforall x (August(x) and Ungodly(x) -> Smashing(x))\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> August(x))\nSmashing(tatum) -> Premium(tatum)\n\nnot Ungodly(antonella)\n\nnot Ungodly(antonella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Mercy is injured. Morty is eleven. Ruby is bolivian. Estel is bone. All amorphous things are eleven. Blue, fringy things are bone. If something is adust then it is amorphous. All adust, fringy things are amorphous. Cold things are adust. If Mercy is amorphous then Mercy is bolivian. Morty is bolivian.", "logic": "\nInjured(mercy)\nEleven(morty)\nBolivian(ruby)\nBone(estel)\nforall x (Amorphous(x) -> Eleven(x))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Fringy(x) -> Bone(x))\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Amorphous(x))\nforall x (Adust(x) and Fringy(x) -> Amorphous(x))\nforall x (Injured(x) -> Adust(x))\nAmorphous(mercy) -> Bolivian(mercy)\n\nBolivian(morty)\n\nBolivian(morty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "The diamond is punishing. Young people are not sticking. If someone is cumuliform then they are punishing. If someone is sticking and burnt then they are punishing. All burnt, unmolested people are punishing. All unmolested, punishing people are burnt. All unmolested people are burnt. Red people are unmolested. If someone is punishing then they are not cumuliform. The diamond is punishing.", "logic": "\nPunishing(diamond)\nforall x (Burnt(x) -> not Sticking(x))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) -> Punishing(x))\nforall x (Sticking(x) and Burnt(x) -> Punishing(x))\nforall x (Burnt(x) and Unmolested(x) -> Punishing(x))\nforall x (Unmolested(x) and Punishing(x) -> Burnt(x))\nforall x (Unmolested(x) -> Burnt(x))\nforall x (Punishing(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nforall x (Punishing(x) -> not Cumuliform(x))\n\nPunishing(diamond)\n\ntherefore Punishing(diamond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The rozele is downlike. Young people are not adsorbable. If someone is biped then they are downlike. If someone is adsorbable and papillate then they are downlike. All papillate, housebound people are downlike. All housebound, downlike people are papillate. All housebound people are papillate. Red people are housebound. If someone is downlike then they are not biped. The rozele is not downlike.", "logic": "\nDownlike(rozele)\nforall x (Papillate(x) -> not Adsorbable(x))\nforall x (Biped(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) and Papillate(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Papillate(x) and Housebound(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Housebound(x) and Downlike(x) -> Papillate(x))\nforall x (Housebound(x) -> Papillate(x))\nforall x (Downlike(x) -> Housebound(x))\nforall x (Downlike(x) -> not Biped(x))\n\nnot Downlike(rozele)\n\ntherefore Downlike(rozele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The husain is slipping. Young people are not endodontic. If someone is unwearied then they are slipping. If someone is endodontic and demented then they are slipping. All demented, blistery people are slipping. All blistery, slipping people are demented. All blistery people are demented. Red people are blistery. If someone is slipping then they are not unwearied. The husain is not unwearied.", "logic": "\nSlipping(husain)\nforall x (Demented(x) -> not Endodontic(x))\nforall x (Unwearied(x) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) and Demented(x) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Demented(x) and Blistery(x) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Slipping(x) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Slipping(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Slipping(x) -> not Unwearied(x))\n\nnot Unwearied(husain)\n\nSlipping(husain) and forall x (Slipping(x) -> not Unwearied(x)) -> therefore not Unwearied(husain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The ardath is lightless. Young people are not sloppy. If someone is spindly then they are lightless. If someone is sloppy and unstable then they are lightless. All unstable, broadloom people are lightless. All broadloom, lightless people are unstable. All broadloom people are unstable. Red people are broadloom. If someone is lightless then they are not spindly. The ardath is not broadloom.", "logic": "\nLightless(ardath)\nforall x (Unstable(x) -> not Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Spindly(x) -> Lightless(x))\nforall x (Sloppy(x) and Unstable(x) -> Lightless(x))\nforall x (Unstable(x) and Broadloom(x) -> Lightless(x))\nforall x (Broadloom(x) and Lightless(x) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Lightless(x) -> Broadloom(x))\nforall x (Lightless(x) -> not Spindly(x))\n\nnot Broadloom(ardath)\n\nLightless(ardath) and forall x (Lightless(x) -> Broadloom(x)) -> therefore Broadloom(ardath)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The sapphire is aspheric. Young people are not unremedied. If someone is faced then they are aspheric. If someone is unremedied and ludicrous then they are aspheric. All ludicrous, marxist people are aspheric. All marxist, aspheric people are ludicrous. All marxist people are ludicrous. Red people are marxist. If someone is aspheric then they are not faced. The sapphire is ludicrous.", "logic": "\nAspheric(sapphire)\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) -> not Unremedied(x))\nforall x (Faced(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) and Ludicrous(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) and Marxist(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Marxist(x) and Aspheric(x) -> Ludicrous(x))\nforall x (Marxist(x) -> Ludicrous(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> Marxist(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> not Faced(x))\n\nLudicrous(sapphire)\n\nAspheric(sapphire) and forall x (Aspheric(x) -> Marxist(x)) -> therefore Marxist(sapphire) Marxist(sapphire) and forall x (Marxist(x) -> Ludicrous(x)) -> therefore Ludicrous(sapphire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The sadie is auxinic. Young people are not amebous. If someone is rife then they are auxinic. If someone is amebous and butcherly then they are auxinic. All butcherly, inhumed people are auxinic. All inhumed, auxinic people are butcherly. All inhumed people are butcherly. Red people are inhumed. If someone is auxinic then they are not rife. The sadie is not butcherly.", "logic": "\nAuxinic(sadie)\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> not Amebous(x))\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Auxinic(x))\nforall x (Amebous(x) and Butcherly(x) -> Auxinic(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) and Inhumed(x) -> Auxinic(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) and Auxinic(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> Inhumed(x))\nforall x (Auxinic(x) -> not Rife(x))\n\nnot Butcherly(sadie)\n\nAuxinic(sadie) and forall x (Auxinic(x) -> Inhumed(x)) -> therefore Inhumed(sadie) Inhumed(sadie) and forall x (Inhumed(x) -> Butcherly(x)) -> therefore Butcherly(sadie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The elaine is unexceeded. Young people are not auricular. If someone is groovy then they are unexceeded. If someone is auricular and hired then they are unexceeded. All hired, connective people are unexceeded. All connective, unexceeded people are hired. All connective people are hired. Red people are connective. If someone is unexceeded then they are not groovy. The elaine is not auricular.", "logic": "\nUnexceeded(elaine)\nforall x (Hired(x) -> not Auricular(x))\nforall x (Groovy(x) -> Unexceeded(x))\nforall x (Auricular(x) and Hired(x) -> Unexceeded(x))\nforall x (Hired(x) and Connective(x) -> Unexceeded(x))\nforall x (Connective(x) and Unexceeded(x) -> Hired(x))\nforall x (Connective(x) -> Hired(x))\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> not Groovy(x))\n\nnot Auricular(elaine)\n\nUnexceeded(elaine) and forall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Connective(x)) -> therefore Connective(elaine) Connective(elaine) and forall x (Connective(x) -> Hired(x)) -> therefore Hired(elaine) Hired(elaine) and forall x (Hired(x) -> not Auricular(x)) -> therefore not Auricular(elaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The karole is guileless. Young people are not pukka. If someone is pneumatic then they are guileless. If someone is pukka and ambient then they are guileless. All ambient, archetypal people are guileless. All archetypal, guileless people are ambient. All archetypal people are ambient. Red people are archetypal. If someone is guileless then they are not pneumatic. The karole is pukka.", "logic": "\nGuileless(karole)\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> not Pukka(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Pukka(x) and Ambient(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Ambient(x) and Archetypal(x) -> Guileless(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and Guileless(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> Archetypal(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> not Pneumatic(x))\n\nPukka(karole)\n\nGuileless(karole) and forall x (Guileless(x) -> Archetypal(x)) -> therefore Archetypal(karole) Archetypal(karole) and forall x (Archetypal(x) -> Ambient(x)) -> therefore Ambient(karole) Ambient(karole) and forall x (Ambient(x) -> not Pukka(x)) -> therefore not Pukka(karole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The marci is adored. Young people are not inscribed. If someone is congolese then they are adored. If someone is inscribed and hammy then they are adored. All hammy, dissenting people are adored. All dissenting, adored people are hammy. All dissenting people are hammy. Red people are dissenting. If someone is adored then they are not congolese. The marci does not need the marci.", "logic": "\nAdored(marci)\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> not Inscribed(x))\nforall x (Congolese(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Inscribed(x) and Hammy(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) and Dissenting(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) and Adored(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) -> Dissenting(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) -> not Congolese(x))\n\nnot Needs(marci, marci)\n\nnot Needs(marci, marci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The rogers is beaming. Young people are not false. If someone is merging then they are beaming. If someone is false and ratable then they are beaming. All ratable, amended people are beaming. All amended, beaming people are ratable. All amended people are ratable. Red people are amended. If someone is beaming then they are not merging. The rogers chases the rogers.", "logic": "\nBeaming(rogers)\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> not False(x))\nforall x (Merging(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (False(x) and Ratable(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) and Amended(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Amended(x) and Beaming(x) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Amended(x) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Beaming(x) -> Amended(x))\nforall x (Beaming(x) -> not Merging(x))\n\nChases(rogers, rogers)\n\nChases(rogers, rogers) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "The marita is legible. The marita is minus. The marita is obsessed. The marita is uncordial. The marita is arduous. If the marita is minus then the marita is arduous. Kind, arduous things are legible. The marita is obsessed.", "logic": "\nLegible(marita)\nMinus(marita)\nObsessed(marita)\nUncordial(marita)\nArduous(marita)\nMinus(marita) -> Arduous(marita)\nforall x (Minus(x) and Arduous(x) -> Legible(x))\n\nObsessed(marita)\n\ntherefore Obsessed(marita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3264"} {"premises": "The lawerence is unwed. The lawerence is lunisolar. The lawerence is emollient. The lawerence is resistless. The lawerence is ocher. If the lawerence is lunisolar then the lawerence is ocher. Kind, ocher things are unwed. The lawerence is not ocher.", "logic": "\nUnwed(lawerence)\nLunisolar(lawerence)\nEmollient(lawerence)\nResistless(lawerence)\nOcher(lawerence)\nLunisolar(lawerence) -> Ocher(lawerence)\nforall x (Lunisolar(x) and Ocher(x) -> Unwed(x))\n\nnot Ocher(lawerence)\n\ntherefore Ocher(lawerence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3264"} {"premises": "The carrol is biweekly. The carrol is cortical. The carrol is chunky. The carrol is fastidious. The carrol is lost. If the carrol is cortical then the carrol is lost. Kind, lost things are biweekly. The carrol does not like the carrol.", "logic": "\nBiweekly(carrol)\nCortical(carrol)\nChunky(carrol)\nFastidious(carrol)\nLost(carrol)\nCortical(carrol) -> Lost(carrol)\nforall x (Cortical(x) and Lost(x) -> Biweekly(x))\n\nnot Likes(carrol, carrol)\n\nnot Likes(carrol, carrol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3264"} {"premises": "The karlene is feudatory. The karlene is blithesome. The karlene is preachy. The karlene is undefended. The karlene is sole. If the karlene is blithesome then the karlene is sole. Kind, sole things are feudatory. The karlene eats the karlene.", "logic": "\nFeudatory(karlene)\nBlithesome(karlene)\nPreachy(karlene)\nUndefended(karlene)\nSole(karlene)\nBlithesome(karlene) -> Sole(karlene)\nforall x (Blithesome(x) and Sole(x) -> Feudatory(x))\n\nEats(karlene, karlene)\n\nEats(karlene, karlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3264"} {"premises": "The sonya cowl the mendel. The sonya cowl the wallie. The sonya reelect the wallie. The sonya is phoney. The sonya does not visit the mendel. The sonya fluff the wallie. The mendel cowl the sonya. The mendel reelect the sonya. The mendel does not eat the wallie. The mendel is scrubby. The mendel fluff the sonya. The wallie cowl the mendel. The wallie reelect the sonya. The wallie reelect the mendel. The wallie fluff the mendel. If something is laconic then it does not eat the sonya. If something cowl the mendel and the mendel reelect the sonya then it reelect the wallie. If something fluff the wallie and the wallie cowl the mendel then the wallie does not visit the sonya. If the mendel cowl the wallie then the mendel is noncurrent. If the wallie does not visit the sonya then the wallie is not scrubby. If something cowl the wallie and the wallie is not scrubby then it is despondent. The wallie cowl the mendel.", "logic": "\nCowl(sonya, mendel)\nCowl(sonya, wallie)\nReelect(sonya, wallie)\nPhoney(sonya)\nnot Fluff(sonya, mendel)\nFluff(sonya, wallie)\nCowl(mendel, sonya)\nReelect(mendel, sonya)\nnot Reelect(mendel, wallie)\nScrubby(mendel)\nFluff(mendel, sonya)\nCowl(wallie, mendel)\nReelect(wallie, sonya)\nReelect(wallie, mendel)\nFluff(wallie, mendel)\nforall x (Laconic(x) -> not Reelect(x, sonya))\nforall x (Cowl(x, mendel) and Reelect(mendel, sonya) -> Reelect(x, wallie))\nforall x (Fluff(x, wallie) and Cowl(wallie, mendel) -> not Fluff(wallie, sonya))\nCowl(mendel, wallie) -> Noncurrent(mendel)\nnot Fluff(wallie, sonya) -> not Scrubby(wallie)\nforall x (Cowl(x, wallie) and not Scrubby(wallie) -> Despondent(x))\n\nCowl(wallie, mendel)\n\ntherefore Cowl(wallie, mendel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The poul simonise the keslie. The poul simonise the antonino. The poul offset the antonino. The poul is duplicate. The poul does not visit the keslie. The poul bedaze the antonino. The keslie simonise the poul. The keslie offset the poul. The keslie does not eat the antonino. The keslie is adjectival. The keslie bedaze the poul. The antonino simonise the keslie. The antonino offset the poul. The antonino offset the keslie. The antonino bedaze the keslie. If something is cornish then it does not eat the poul. If something simonise the keslie and the keslie offset the poul then it offset the antonino. If something bedaze the antonino and the antonino simonise the keslie then the antonino does not visit the poul. If the keslie simonise the antonino then the keslie is cretinous. If the antonino does not visit the poul then the antonino is not adjectival. If something simonise the antonino and the antonino is not adjectival then it is cupulate. The poul does not visit the antonino.", "logic": "\nSimonise(poul, keslie)\nSimonise(poul, antonino)\nOffset(poul, antonino)\nDuplicate(poul)\nnot Bedaze(poul, keslie)\nBedaze(poul, antonino)\nSimonise(keslie, poul)\nOffset(keslie, poul)\nnot Offset(keslie, antonino)\nAdjectival(keslie)\nBedaze(keslie, poul)\nSimonise(antonino, keslie)\nOffset(antonino, poul)\nOffset(antonino, keslie)\nBedaze(antonino, keslie)\nforall x (Cornish(x) -> not Offset(x, poul))\nforall x (Simonise(x, keslie) and Offset(keslie, poul) -> Offset(x, antonino))\nforall x (Bedaze(x, antonino) and Simonise(antonino, keslie) -> not Bedaze(antonino, poul))\nSimonise(keslie, antonino) -> Cretinous(keslie)\nnot Bedaze(antonino, poul) -> not Adjectival(antonino)\nforall x (Simonise(x, antonino) and not Adjectival(antonino) -> Cupulate(x))\n\nnot Bedaze(poul, antonino)\n\ntherefore Bedaze(poul, antonino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The talbot hone the gabbey. The talbot hone the gaven. The talbot cannon the gaven. The talbot is enviable. The talbot does not visit the gabbey. The talbot crackle the gaven. The gabbey hone the talbot. The gabbey cannon the talbot. The gabbey does not eat the gaven. The gabbey is menopausal. The gabbey crackle the talbot. The gaven hone the gabbey. The gaven cannon the talbot. The gaven cannon the gabbey. The gaven crackle the gabbey. If something is totaled then it does not eat the talbot. If something hone the gabbey and the gabbey cannon the talbot then it cannon the gaven. If something crackle the gaven and the gaven hone the gabbey then the gaven does not visit the talbot. If the gabbey hone the gaven then the gabbey is coccal. If the gaven does not visit the talbot then the gaven is not menopausal. If something hone the gaven and the gaven is not menopausal then it is academic. The gaven does not visit the talbot.", "logic": "\nHone(talbot, gabbey)\nHone(talbot, gaven)\nCannon(talbot, gaven)\nEnviable(talbot)\nnot Crackle(talbot, gabbey)\nCrackle(talbot, gaven)\nHone(gabbey, talbot)\nCannon(gabbey, talbot)\nnot Cannon(gabbey, gaven)\nMenopausal(gabbey)\nCrackle(gabbey, talbot)\nHone(gaven, gabbey)\nCannon(gaven, talbot)\nCannon(gaven, gabbey)\nCrackle(gaven, gabbey)\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> not Cannon(x, talbot))\nforall x (Hone(x, gabbey) and Cannon(gabbey, talbot) -> Cannon(x, gaven))\nforall x (Crackle(x, gaven) and Hone(gaven, gabbey) -> not Crackle(gaven, talbot))\nHone(gabbey, gaven) -> Coccal(gabbey)\nnot Crackle(gaven, talbot) -> not Menopausal(gaven)\nforall x (Hone(x, gaven) and not Menopausal(gaven) -> Academic(x))\n\nnot Crackle(gaven, talbot)\n\nCrackle(talbot, gaven) and Hone(gaven, gabbey) and forall x (Crackle(x, gaven) and Hone(gaven, gabbey) -> not Crackle(gaven, talbot)) -> therefore not Crackle(gaven, talbot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The mariana crosshatch the jaquelyn. The mariana crosshatch the giordano. The mariana resell the giordano. The mariana is perfumed. The mariana does not visit the jaquelyn. The mariana moan the giordano. The jaquelyn crosshatch the mariana. The jaquelyn resell the mariana. The jaquelyn does not eat the giordano. The jaquelyn is impromptu. The jaquelyn moan the mariana. The giordano crosshatch the jaquelyn. The giordano resell the mariana. The giordano resell the jaquelyn. The giordano moan the jaquelyn. If something is cumbersome then it does not eat the mariana. If something crosshatch the jaquelyn and the jaquelyn resell the mariana then it resell the giordano. If something moan the giordano and the giordano crosshatch the jaquelyn then the giordano does not visit the mariana. If the jaquelyn crosshatch the giordano then the jaquelyn is nosohusial. If the giordano does not visit the mariana then the giordano is not impromptu. If something crosshatch the giordano and the giordano is not impromptu then it is colombian. The giordano moan the mariana.", "logic": "\nCrosshatch(mariana, jaquelyn)\nCrosshatch(mariana, giordano)\nResell(mariana, giordano)\nPerfumed(mariana)\nnot Moan(mariana, jaquelyn)\nMoan(mariana, giordano)\nCrosshatch(jaquelyn, mariana)\nResell(jaquelyn, mariana)\nnot Resell(jaquelyn, giordano)\nImpromptu(jaquelyn)\nMoan(jaquelyn, mariana)\nCrosshatch(giordano, jaquelyn)\nResell(giordano, mariana)\nResell(giordano, jaquelyn)\nMoan(giordano, jaquelyn)\nforall x (Cumbersome(x) -> not Resell(x, mariana))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, jaquelyn) and Resell(jaquelyn, mariana) -> Resell(x, giordano))\nforall x (Moan(x, giordano) and Crosshatch(giordano, jaquelyn) -> not Moan(giordano, mariana))\nCrosshatch(jaquelyn, giordano) -> Nosohusial(jaquelyn)\nnot Moan(giordano, mariana) -> not Impromptu(giordano)\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, giordano) and not Impromptu(giordano) -> Colombian(x))\n\nMoan(giordano, mariana)\n\nMoan(mariana, giordano) and Crosshatch(giordano, jaquelyn) and forall x (Moan(x, giordano) and Crosshatch(giordano, jaquelyn) -> not Moan(giordano, mariana)) -> therefore not Moan(giordano, mariana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The vale reflect the lilia. The vale reflect the eliot. The vale beef the eliot. The vale is expressed. The vale does not visit the lilia. The vale popularise the eliot. The lilia reflect the vale. The lilia beef the vale. The lilia does not eat the eliot. The lilia is debonnaire. The lilia popularise the vale. The eliot reflect the lilia. The eliot beef the vale. The eliot beef the lilia. The eliot popularise the lilia. If something is bounden then it does not eat the vale. If something reflect the lilia and the lilia beef the vale then it beef the eliot. If something popularise the eliot and the eliot reflect the lilia then the eliot does not visit the vale. If the lilia reflect the eliot then the lilia is pleading. If the eliot does not visit the vale then the eliot is not debonnaire. If something reflect the eliot and the eliot is not debonnaire then it is juxtaposed. The eliot is not debonnaire.", "logic": "\nReflect(vale, lilia)\nReflect(vale, eliot)\nBeef(vale, eliot)\nExpressed(vale)\nnot Popularise(vale, lilia)\nPopularise(vale, eliot)\nReflect(lilia, vale)\nBeef(lilia, vale)\nnot Beef(lilia, eliot)\nDebonnaire(lilia)\nPopularise(lilia, vale)\nReflect(eliot, lilia)\nBeef(eliot, vale)\nBeef(eliot, lilia)\nPopularise(eliot, lilia)\nforall x (Bounden(x) -> not Beef(x, vale))\nforall x (Reflect(x, lilia) and Beef(lilia, vale) -> Beef(x, eliot))\nforall x (Popularise(x, eliot) and Reflect(eliot, lilia) -> not Popularise(eliot, vale))\nReflect(lilia, eliot) -> Pleading(lilia)\nnot Popularise(eliot, vale) -> not Debonnaire(eliot)\nforall x (Reflect(x, eliot) and not Debonnaire(eliot) -> Juxtaposed(x))\n\nnot Debonnaire(eliot)\n\nPopularise(vale, eliot) and Reflect(eliot, lilia) and forall x (Popularise(x, eliot) and Reflect(eliot, lilia) -> not Popularise(eliot, vale)) -> therefore not Popularise(eliot, vale) not Popularise(eliot, vale) and not Popularise(eliot, vale) -> not Debonnaire(eliot) -> therefore not Debonnaire(eliot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The klarrisa shank the gabbey. The klarrisa shank the ofelia. The klarrisa aspirate the ofelia. The klarrisa is momentary. The klarrisa does not visit the gabbey. The klarrisa scrap the ofelia. The gabbey shank the klarrisa. The gabbey aspirate the klarrisa. The gabbey does not eat the ofelia. The gabbey is loyal. The gabbey scrap the klarrisa. The ofelia shank the gabbey. The ofelia aspirate the klarrisa. The ofelia aspirate the gabbey. The ofelia scrap the gabbey. If something is handwoven then it does not eat the klarrisa. If something shank the gabbey and the gabbey aspirate the klarrisa then it aspirate the ofelia. If something scrap the ofelia and the ofelia shank the gabbey then the ofelia does not visit the klarrisa. If the gabbey shank the ofelia then the gabbey is austral. If the ofelia does not visit the klarrisa then the ofelia is not loyal. If something shank the ofelia and the ofelia is not loyal then it is distal. The ofelia is loyal.", "logic": "\nShank(klarrisa, gabbey)\nShank(klarrisa, ofelia)\nAspirate(klarrisa, ofelia)\nMomentary(klarrisa)\nnot Scrap(klarrisa, gabbey)\nScrap(klarrisa, ofelia)\nShank(gabbey, klarrisa)\nAspirate(gabbey, klarrisa)\nnot Aspirate(gabbey, ofelia)\nLoyal(gabbey)\nScrap(gabbey, klarrisa)\nShank(ofelia, gabbey)\nAspirate(ofelia, klarrisa)\nAspirate(ofelia, gabbey)\nScrap(ofelia, gabbey)\nforall x (Handwoven(x) -> not Aspirate(x, klarrisa))\nforall x (Shank(x, gabbey) and Aspirate(gabbey, klarrisa) -> Aspirate(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Scrap(x, ofelia) and Shank(ofelia, gabbey) -> not Scrap(ofelia, klarrisa))\nShank(gabbey, ofelia) -> Austral(gabbey)\nnot Scrap(ofelia, klarrisa) -> not Loyal(ofelia)\nforall x (Shank(x, ofelia) and not Loyal(ofelia) -> Distal(x))\n\nLoyal(ofelia)\n\nScrap(klarrisa, ofelia) and Shank(ofelia, gabbey) and forall x (Scrap(x, ofelia) and Shank(ofelia, gabbey) -> not Scrap(ofelia, klarrisa)) -> therefore not Scrap(ofelia, klarrisa) not Scrap(ofelia, klarrisa) and not Scrap(ofelia, klarrisa) -> not Loyal(ofelia) -> therefore not Loyal(ofelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The erda replant the rose. The erda replant the jenette. The erda bong the jenette. The erda is catabolic. The erda does not visit the rose. The erda imply the jenette. The rose replant the erda. The rose bong the erda. The rose does not eat the jenette. The rose is facial. The rose imply the erda. The jenette replant the rose. The jenette bong the erda. The jenette bong the rose. The jenette imply the rose. If something is unfeasible then it does not eat the erda. If something replant the rose and the rose bong the erda then it bong the jenette. If something imply the jenette and the jenette replant the rose then the jenette does not visit the erda. If the rose replant the jenette then the rose is hammered. If the jenette does not visit the erda then the jenette is not facial. If something replant the jenette and the jenette is not facial then it is prudish. The erda is prudish.", "logic": "\nReplant(erda, rose)\nReplant(erda, jenette)\nBong(erda, jenette)\nCatabolic(erda)\nnot Imply(erda, rose)\nImply(erda, jenette)\nReplant(rose, erda)\nBong(rose, erda)\nnot Bong(rose, jenette)\nFacial(rose)\nImply(rose, erda)\nReplant(jenette, rose)\nBong(jenette, erda)\nBong(jenette, rose)\nImply(jenette, rose)\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) -> not Bong(x, erda))\nforall x (Replant(x, rose) and Bong(rose, erda) -> Bong(x, jenette))\nforall x (Imply(x, jenette) and Replant(jenette, rose) -> not Imply(jenette, erda))\nReplant(rose, jenette) -> Hammered(rose)\nnot Imply(jenette, erda) -> not Facial(jenette)\nforall x (Replant(x, jenette) and not Facial(jenette) -> Prudish(x))\n\nPrudish(erda)\n\nImply(erda, jenette) and Replant(jenette, rose) and forall x (Imply(x, jenette) and Replant(jenette, rose) -> not Imply(jenette, erda)) -> therefore not Imply(jenette, erda) not Imply(jenette, erda) and not Imply(jenette, erda) -> not Facial(jenette) -> therefore not Facial(jenette) Replant(erda, jenette) and not Facial(jenette) and forall x (Replant(x, jenette) and not Facial(jenette) -> Prudish(x)) -> therefore Prudish(erda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The zelda parrot the fitz. The zelda parrot the vena. The zelda mangle the vena. The zelda is basipetal. The zelda does not visit the fitz. The zelda core the vena. The fitz parrot the zelda. The fitz mangle the zelda. The fitz does not eat the vena. The fitz is enumerable. The fitz core the zelda. The vena parrot the fitz. The vena mangle the zelda. The vena mangle the fitz. The vena core the fitz. If something is hitlerian then it does not eat the zelda. If something parrot the fitz and the fitz mangle the zelda then it mangle the vena. If something core the vena and the vena parrot the fitz then the vena does not visit the zelda. If the fitz parrot the vena then the fitz is embezzled. If the vena does not visit the zelda then the vena is not enumerable. If something parrot the vena and the vena is not enumerable then it is funky. The zelda is not funky.", "logic": "\nParrot(zelda, fitz)\nParrot(zelda, vena)\nMangle(zelda, vena)\nBasipetal(zelda)\nnot Core(zelda, fitz)\nCore(zelda, vena)\nParrot(fitz, zelda)\nMangle(fitz, zelda)\nnot Mangle(fitz, vena)\nEnumerable(fitz)\nCore(fitz, zelda)\nParrot(vena, fitz)\nMangle(vena, zelda)\nMangle(vena, fitz)\nCore(vena, fitz)\nforall x (Hitlerian(x) -> not Mangle(x, zelda))\nforall x (Parrot(x, fitz) and Mangle(fitz, zelda) -> Mangle(x, vena))\nforall x (Core(x, vena) and Parrot(vena, fitz) -> not Core(vena, zelda))\nParrot(fitz, vena) -> Embezzled(fitz)\nnot Core(vena, zelda) -> not Enumerable(vena)\nforall x (Parrot(x, vena) and not Enumerable(vena) -> Funky(x))\n\nnot Funky(zelda)\n\nCore(zelda, vena) and Parrot(vena, fitz) and forall x (Core(x, vena) and Parrot(vena, fitz) -> not Core(vena, zelda)) -> therefore not Core(vena, zelda) not Core(vena, zelda) and not Core(vena, zelda) -> not Enumerable(vena) -> therefore not Enumerable(vena) Parrot(zelda, vena) and not Enumerable(vena) and forall x (Parrot(x, vena) and not Enumerable(vena) -> Funky(x)) -> therefore Funky(zelda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The randolf blur the terrie. The randolf blur the shawnee. The randolf react the shawnee. The randolf is mercurous. The randolf does not visit the terrie. The randolf bloviate the shawnee. The terrie blur the randolf. The terrie react the randolf. The terrie does not eat the shawnee. The terrie is techy. The terrie bloviate the randolf. The shawnee blur the terrie. The shawnee react the randolf. The shawnee react the terrie. The shawnee bloviate the terrie. If something is detested then it does not eat the randolf. If something blur the terrie and the terrie react the randolf then it react the shawnee. If something bloviate the shawnee and the shawnee blur the terrie then the shawnee does not visit the randolf. If the terrie blur the shawnee then the terrie is newfound. If the shawnee does not visit the randolf then the shawnee is not techy. If something blur the shawnee and the shawnee is not techy then it is deferent. The terrie is not newfound.", "logic": "\nBlur(randolf, terrie)\nBlur(randolf, shawnee)\nReact(randolf, shawnee)\nMercurous(randolf)\nnot Bloviate(randolf, terrie)\nBloviate(randolf, shawnee)\nBlur(terrie, randolf)\nReact(terrie, randolf)\nnot React(terrie, shawnee)\nTechy(terrie)\nBloviate(terrie, randolf)\nBlur(shawnee, terrie)\nReact(shawnee, randolf)\nReact(shawnee, terrie)\nBloviate(shawnee, terrie)\nforall x (Detested(x) -> not React(x, randolf))\nforall x (Blur(x, terrie) and React(terrie, randolf) -> React(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, shawnee) and Blur(shawnee, terrie) -> not Bloviate(shawnee, randolf))\nBlur(terrie, shawnee) -> Newfound(terrie)\nnot Bloviate(shawnee, randolf) -> not Techy(shawnee)\nforall x (Blur(x, shawnee) and not Techy(shawnee) -> Deferent(x))\n\nnot Newfound(terrie)\n\nBlur(terrie, shawnee) -> Newfound(terrie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The lacy coach the leeanne. The lacy coach the eba. The lacy overprint the eba. The lacy is hurtful. The lacy does not visit the leeanne. The lacy overboil the eba. The leeanne coach the lacy. The leeanne overprint the lacy. The leeanne does not eat the eba. The leeanne is beamy. The leeanne overboil the lacy. The eba coach the leeanne. The eba overprint the lacy. The eba overprint the leeanne. The eba overboil the leeanne. If something is heuristic then it does not eat the lacy. If something coach the leeanne and the leeanne overprint the lacy then it overprint the eba. If something overboil the eba and the eba coach the leeanne then the eba does not visit the lacy. If the leeanne coach the eba then the leeanne is nominated. If the eba does not visit the lacy then the eba is not beamy. If something coach the eba and the eba is not beamy then it is syntactic. The leeanne is syntactic.", "logic": "\nCoach(lacy, leeanne)\nCoach(lacy, eba)\nOverprint(lacy, eba)\nHurtful(lacy)\nnot Overboil(lacy, leeanne)\nOverboil(lacy, eba)\nCoach(leeanne, lacy)\nOverprint(leeanne, lacy)\nnot Overprint(leeanne, eba)\nBeamy(leeanne)\nOverboil(leeanne, lacy)\nCoach(eba, leeanne)\nOverprint(eba, lacy)\nOverprint(eba, leeanne)\nOverboil(eba, leeanne)\nforall x (Heuristic(x) -> not Overprint(x, lacy))\nforall x (Coach(x, leeanne) and Overprint(leeanne, lacy) -> Overprint(x, eba))\nforall x (Overboil(x, eba) and Coach(eba, leeanne) -> not Overboil(eba, lacy))\nCoach(leeanne, eba) -> Nominated(leeanne)\nnot Overboil(eba, lacy) -> not Beamy(eba)\nforall x (Coach(x, eba) and not Beamy(eba) -> Syntactic(x))\n\nSyntactic(leeanne)\n\nforall x (Coach(x, eba) and not Beamy(eba) -> Syntactic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The kennedy wriggle the tarrah. The kennedy wriggle the saundra. The kennedy slink the saundra. The kennedy is harmless. The kennedy does not visit the tarrah. The kennedy stymie the saundra. The tarrah wriggle the kennedy. The tarrah slink the kennedy. The tarrah does not eat the saundra. The tarrah is brimful. The tarrah stymie the kennedy. The saundra wriggle the tarrah. The saundra slink the kennedy. The saundra slink the tarrah. The saundra stymie the tarrah. If something is italian then it does not eat the kennedy. If something wriggle the tarrah and the tarrah slink the kennedy then it slink the saundra. If something stymie the saundra and the saundra wriggle the tarrah then the saundra does not visit the kennedy. If the tarrah wriggle the saundra then the tarrah is brutish. If the saundra does not visit the kennedy then the saundra is not brimful. If something wriggle the saundra and the saundra is not brimful then it is dexterous. The saundra is not dexterous.", "logic": "\nWriggle(kennedy, tarrah)\nWriggle(kennedy, saundra)\nSlink(kennedy, saundra)\nHarmless(kennedy)\nnot Stymie(kennedy, tarrah)\nStymie(kennedy, saundra)\nWriggle(tarrah, kennedy)\nSlink(tarrah, kennedy)\nnot Slink(tarrah, saundra)\nBrimful(tarrah)\nStymie(tarrah, kennedy)\nWriggle(saundra, tarrah)\nSlink(saundra, kennedy)\nSlink(saundra, tarrah)\nStymie(saundra, tarrah)\nforall x (Italian(x) -> not Slink(x, kennedy))\nforall x (Wriggle(x, tarrah) and Slink(tarrah, kennedy) -> Slink(x, saundra))\nforall x (Stymie(x, saundra) and Wriggle(saundra, tarrah) -> not Stymie(saundra, kennedy))\nWriggle(tarrah, saundra) -> Brutish(tarrah)\nnot Stymie(saundra, kennedy) -> not Brimful(saundra)\nforall x (Wriggle(x, saundra) and not Brimful(saundra) -> Dexterous(x))\n\nnot Dexterous(saundra)\n\nforall x (Wriggle(x, saundra) and not Brimful(saundra) -> Dexterous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The chryste complexion the teressa. The chryste complexion the ethelyn. The chryste roughhouse the ethelyn. The chryste is ametropic. The chryste does not visit the teressa. The chryste object the ethelyn. The teressa complexion the chryste. The teressa roughhouse the chryste. The teressa does not eat the ethelyn. The teressa is torn. The teressa object the chryste. The ethelyn complexion the teressa. The ethelyn roughhouse the chryste. The ethelyn roughhouse the teressa. The ethelyn object the teressa. If something is flatulent then it does not eat the chryste. If something complexion the teressa and the teressa roughhouse the chryste then it roughhouse the ethelyn. If something object the ethelyn and the ethelyn complexion the teressa then the ethelyn does not visit the chryste. If the teressa complexion the ethelyn then the teressa is modifiable. If the ethelyn does not visit the chryste then the ethelyn is not torn. If something complexion the ethelyn and the ethelyn is not torn then it is eudemonic. The ethelyn complexion the chryste.", "logic": "\nComplexion(chryste, teressa)\nComplexion(chryste, ethelyn)\nRoughhouse(chryste, ethelyn)\nAmetropic(chryste)\nnot Object(chryste, teressa)\nObject(chryste, ethelyn)\nComplexion(teressa, chryste)\nRoughhouse(teressa, chryste)\nnot Roughhouse(teressa, ethelyn)\nTorn(teressa)\nObject(teressa, chryste)\nComplexion(ethelyn, teressa)\nRoughhouse(ethelyn, chryste)\nRoughhouse(ethelyn, teressa)\nObject(ethelyn, teressa)\nforall x (Flatulent(x) -> not Roughhouse(x, chryste))\nforall x (Complexion(x, teressa) and Roughhouse(teressa, chryste) -> Roughhouse(x, ethelyn))\nforall x (Object(x, ethelyn) and Complexion(ethelyn, teressa) -> not Object(ethelyn, chryste))\nComplexion(teressa, ethelyn) -> Modifiable(teressa)\nnot Object(ethelyn, chryste) -> not Torn(ethelyn)\nforall x (Complexion(x, ethelyn) and not Torn(ethelyn) -> Eudemonic(x))\n\nComplexion(ethelyn, chryste)\n\nComplexion(ethelyn, chryste) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The carmelle accurse the ashely. The carmelle accurse the judie. The carmelle anastomose the judie. The carmelle is meteoritic. The carmelle does not visit the ashely. The carmelle quiesce the judie. The ashely accurse the carmelle. The ashely anastomose the carmelle. The ashely does not eat the judie. The ashely is gluteal. The ashely quiesce the carmelle. The judie accurse the ashely. The judie anastomose the carmelle. The judie anastomose the ashely. The judie quiesce the ashely. If something is binomial then it does not eat the carmelle. If something accurse the ashely and the ashely anastomose the carmelle then it anastomose the judie. If something quiesce the judie and the judie accurse the ashely then the judie does not visit the carmelle. If the ashely accurse the judie then the ashely is perplexed. If the judie does not visit the carmelle then the judie is not gluteal. If something accurse the judie and the judie is not gluteal then it is historical. The ashely does not chase the ashely.", "logic": "\nAccurse(carmelle, ashely)\nAccurse(carmelle, judie)\nAnastomose(carmelle, judie)\nMeteoritic(carmelle)\nnot Quiesce(carmelle, ashely)\nQuiesce(carmelle, judie)\nAccurse(ashely, carmelle)\nAnastomose(ashely, carmelle)\nnot Anastomose(ashely, judie)\nGluteal(ashely)\nQuiesce(ashely, carmelle)\nAccurse(judie, ashely)\nAnastomose(judie, carmelle)\nAnastomose(judie, ashely)\nQuiesce(judie, ashely)\nforall x (Binomial(x) -> not Anastomose(x, carmelle))\nforall x (Accurse(x, ashely) and Anastomose(ashely, carmelle) -> Anastomose(x, judie))\nforall x (Quiesce(x, judie) and Accurse(judie, ashely) -> not Quiesce(judie, carmelle))\nAccurse(ashely, judie) -> Perplexed(ashely)\nnot Quiesce(judie, carmelle) -> not Gluteal(judie)\nforall x (Accurse(x, judie) and not Gluteal(judie) -> Historical(x))\n\nnot Accurse(ashely, ashely)\n\nnot Accurse(ashely, ashely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The oralia outwear the imelda. The oralia outwear the reagan. The oralia destroy the reagan. The oralia is unbloody. The oralia does not visit the imelda. The oralia stew the reagan. The imelda outwear the oralia. The imelda destroy the oralia. The imelda does not eat the reagan. The imelda is arciform. The imelda stew the oralia. The reagan outwear the imelda. The reagan destroy the oralia. The reagan destroy the imelda. The reagan stew the imelda. If something is petty then it does not eat the oralia. If something outwear the imelda and the imelda destroy the oralia then it destroy the reagan. If something stew the reagan and the reagan outwear the imelda then the reagan does not visit the oralia. If the imelda outwear the reagan then the imelda is habited. If the reagan does not visit the oralia then the reagan is not arciform. If something outwear the reagan and the reagan is not arciform then it is hateful. The reagan outwear the reagan.", "logic": "\nOutwear(oralia, imelda)\nOutwear(oralia, reagan)\nDestroy(oralia, reagan)\nUnbloody(oralia)\nnot Stew(oralia, imelda)\nStew(oralia, reagan)\nOutwear(imelda, oralia)\nDestroy(imelda, oralia)\nnot Destroy(imelda, reagan)\nArciform(imelda)\nStew(imelda, oralia)\nOutwear(reagan, imelda)\nDestroy(reagan, oralia)\nDestroy(reagan, imelda)\nStew(reagan, imelda)\nforall x (Petty(x) -> not Destroy(x, oralia))\nforall x (Outwear(x, imelda) and Destroy(imelda, oralia) -> Destroy(x, reagan))\nforall x (Stew(x, reagan) and Outwear(reagan, imelda) -> not Stew(reagan, oralia))\nOutwear(imelda, reagan) -> Habited(imelda)\nnot Stew(reagan, oralia) -> not Arciform(reagan)\nforall x (Outwear(x, reagan) and not Arciform(reagan) -> Hateful(x))\n\nOutwear(reagan, reagan)\n\nOutwear(reagan, reagan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The florette dropforge the liuka. The florette dropforge the bud. The florette barb the bud. The florette is exploited. The florette does not visit the liuka. The florette reach the bud. The liuka dropforge the florette. The liuka barb the florette. The liuka does not eat the bud. The liuka is relaxing. The liuka reach the florette. The bud dropforge the liuka. The bud barb the florette. The bud barb the liuka. The bud reach the liuka. If something is beholden then it does not eat the florette. If something dropforge the liuka and the liuka barb the florette then it barb the bud. If something reach the bud and the bud dropforge the liuka then the bud does not visit the florette. If the liuka dropforge the bud then the liuka is unliterary. If the bud does not visit the florette then the bud is not relaxing. If something dropforge the bud and the bud is not relaxing then it is supernal. The liuka does not chase the bud.", "logic": "\nDropforge(florette, liuka)\nDropforge(florette, bud)\nBarb(florette, bud)\nExploited(florette)\nnot Reach(florette, liuka)\nReach(florette, bud)\nDropforge(liuka, florette)\nBarb(liuka, florette)\nnot Barb(liuka, bud)\nRelaxing(liuka)\nReach(liuka, florette)\nDropforge(bud, liuka)\nBarb(bud, florette)\nBarb(bud, liuka)\nReach(bud, liuka)\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> not Barb(x, florette))\nforall x (Dropforge(x, liuka) and Barb(liuka, florette) -> Barb(x, bud))\nforall x (Reach(x, bud) and Dropforge(bud, liuka) -> not Reach(bud, florette))\nDropforge(liuka, bud) -> Unliterary(liuka)\nnot Reach(bud, florette) -> not Relaxing(bud)\nforall x (Dropforge(x, bud) and not Relaxing(bud) -> Supernal(x))\n\nnot Dropforge(liuka, bud)\n\nnot Dropforge(liuka, bud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The mame spoof the evania. The mame spoof the thibaut. The mame relent the thibaut. The mame is deepening. The mame does not visit the evania. The mame forge the thibaut. The evania spoof the mame. The evania relent the mame. The evania does not eat the thibaut. The evania is bungled. The evania forge the mame. The thibaut spoof the evania. The thibaut relent the mame. The thibaut relent the evania. The thibaut forge the evania. If something is isothermic then it does not eat the mame. If something spoof the evania and the evania relent the mame then it relent the thibaut. If something forge the thibaut and the thibaut spoof the evania then the thibaut does not visit the mame. If the evania spoof the thibaut then the evania is sodding. If the thibaut does not visit the mame then the thibaut is not bungled. If something spoof the thibaut and the thibaut is not bungled then it is springless. The mame forge the mame.", "logic": "\nSpoof(mame, evania)\nSpoof(mame, thibaut)\nRelent(mame, thibaut)\nDeepening(mame)\nnot Forge(mame, evania)\nForge(mame, thibaut)\nSpoof(evania, mame)\nRelent(evania, mame)\nnot Relent(evania, thibaut)\nBungled(evania)\nForge(evania, mame)\nSpoof(thibaut, evania)\nRelent(thibaut, mame)\nRelent(thibaut, evania)\nForge(thibaut, evania)\nforall x (Isothermic(x) -> not Relent(x, mame))\nforall x (Spoof(x, evania) and Relent(evania, mame) -> Relent(x, thibaut))\nforall x (Forge(x, thibaut) and Spoof(thibaut, evania) -> not Forge(thibaut, mame))\nSpoof(evania, thibaut) -> Sodding(evania)\nnot Forge(thibaut, mame) -> not Bungled(thibaut)\nforall x (Spoof(x, thibaut) and not Bungled(thibaut) -> Springless(x))\n\nForge(mame, mame)\n\nForge(mame, mame) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1452"} {"premises": "The ruth chorus the stacie. The ruth venerate the merell. The ruth ticket the elvina. The stacie chorus the elvina. The stacie venerate the merell. The merell is not curious. The merell venerate the ruth. The merell venerate the elvina. The elvina is not curious. The elvina is not reticular. The elvina venerate the merell. The elvina ticket the ruth. If someone ticket the elvina then the elvina chorus the merell. If someone chorus the merell and the merell is lxxxi then the merell chorus the stacie. If someone ticket the stacie and they do not see the stacie then they see the elvina. If someone chorus the merell then they like the stacie. If someone ticket the merell then they are lxxxi. If someone chorus the stacie then they are not lxxxi. If someone ticket the ruth then they do not like the ruth. If someone venerate the merell and they are curious then the merell does not like the elvina. The ruth venerate the merell.", "logic": "\nChorus(ruth, stacie)\nVenerate(ruth, merell)\nTicket(ruth, elvina)\nChorus(stacie, elvina)\nVenerate(stacie, merell)\nnot Curious(merell)\nVenerate(merell, ruth)\nVenerate(merell, elvina)\nnot Curious(elvina)\nnot Reticular(elvina)\nVenerate(elvina, merell)\nTicket(elvina, ruth)\nforall x (Ticket(x, elvina) -> Chorus(elvina, merell))\nforall x (Chorus(x, merell) and Lxxxi(merell) -> Chorus(merell, stacie))\nforall x (Ticket(x, stacie) and not Venerate(x, stacie) -> Venerate(x, elvina))\nforall x (Chorus(x, merell) -> Chorus(x, stacie))\nforall x (Ticket(x, merell) -> Lxxxi(x))\nforall x (Chorus(x, stacie) -> not Lxxxi(x))\nforall x (Ticket(x, ruth) -> not Chorus(x, ruth))\nforall x (Venerate(x, merell) and Curious(x) -> not Chorus(merell, elvina))\n\nVenerate(ruth, merell)\n\ntherefore Venerate(ruth, merell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The bobby emit the ainsley. The bobby outrange the geneva. The bobby disconcert the ambrosia. The ainsley emit the ambrosia. The ainsley outrange the geneva. The geneva is not tagged. The geneva outrange the bobby. The geneva outrange the ambrosia. The ambrosia is not tagged. The ambrosia is not coarctate. The ambrosia outrange the geneva. The ambrosia disconcert the bobby. If someone disconcert the ambrosia then the ambrosia emit the geneva. If someone emit the geneva and the geneva is helminthic then the geneva emit the ainsley. If someone disconcert the ainsley and they do not see the ainsley then they see the ambrosia. If someone emit the geneva then they like the ainsley. If someone disconcert the geneva then they are helminthic. If someone emit the ainsley then they are not helminthic. If someone disconcert the bobby then they do not like the bobby. If someone outrange the geneva and they are tagged then the geneva does not like the ambrosia. The ambrosia does not visit the bobby.", "logic": "\nEmit(bobby, ainsley)\nOutrange(bobby, geneva)\nDisconcert(bobby, ambrosia)\nEmit(ainsley, ambrosia)\nOutrange(ainsley, geneva)\nnot Tagged(geneva)\nOutrange(geneva, bobby)\nOutrange(geneva, ambrosia)\nnot Tagged(ambrosia)\nnot Coarctate(ambrosia)\nOutrange(ambrosia, geneva)\nDisconcert(ambrosia, bobby)\nforall x (Disconcert(x, ambrosia) -> Emit(ambrosia, geneva))\nforall x (Emit(x, geneva) and Helminthic(geneva) -> Emit(geneva, ainsley))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, ainsley) and not Outrange(x, ainsley) -> Outrange(x, ambrosia))\nforall x (Emit(x, geneva) -> Emit(x, ainsley))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, geneva) -> Helminthic(x))\nforall x (Emit(x, ainsley) -> not Helminthic(x))\nforall x (Disconcert(x, bobby) -> not Emit(x, bobby))\nforall x (Outrange(x, geneva) and Tagged(x) -> not Emit(geneva, ambrosia))\n\nnot Disconcert(ambrosia, bobby)\n\ntherefore Disconcert(ambrosia, bobby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The winston spruce the susannah. The winston housebreak the clyde. The winston binge the ealasaid. The susannah spruce the ealasaid. The susannah housebreak the clyde. The clyde is not faucal. The clyde housebreak the winston. The clyde housebreak the ealasaid. The ealasaid is not faucal. The ealasaid is not perineal. The ealasaid housebreak the clyde. The ealasaid binge the winston. If someone binge the ealasaid then the ealasaid spruce the clyde. If someone spruce the clyde and the clyde is boisterous then the clyde spruce the susannah. If someone binge the susannah and they do not see the susannah then they see the ealasaid. If someone spruce the clyde then they like the susannah. If someone binge the clyde then they are boisterous. If someone spruce the susannah then they are not boisterous. If someone binge the winston then they do not like the winston. If someone housebreak the clyde and they are faucal then the clyde does not like the ealasaid. The ealasaid spruce the clyde.", "logic": "\nSpruce(winston, susannah)\nHousebreak(winston, clyde)\nBinge(winston, ealasaid)\nSpruce(susannah, ealasaid)\nHousebreak(susannah, clyde)\nnot Faucal(clyde)\nHousebreak(clyde, winston)\nHousebreak(clyde, ealasaid)\nnot Faucal(ealasaid)\nnot Perineal(ealasaid)\nHousebreak(ealasaid, clyde)\nBinge(ealasaid, winston)\nforall x (Binge(x, ealasaid) -> Spruce(ealasaid, clyde))\nforall x (Spruce(x, clyde) and Boisterous(clyde) -> Spruce(clyde, susannah))\nforall x (Binge(x, susannah) and not Housebreak(x, susannah) -> Housebreak(x, ealasaid))\nforall x (Spruce(x, clyde) -> Spruce(x, susannah))\nforall x (Binge(x, clyde) -> Boisterous(x))\nforall x (Spruce(x, susannah) -> not Boisterous(x))\nforall x (Binge(x, winston) -> not Spruce(x, winston))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, clyde) and Faucal(x) -> not Spruce(clyde, ealasaid))\n\nSpruce(ealasaid, clyde)\n\nBinge(winston, ealasaid) and forall x (Binge(x, ealasaid) -> Spruce(ealasaid, clyde)) -> therefore Spruce(ealasaid, clyde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The greg porter the ignazio. The greg repossess the hatty. The greg abduct the breena. The ignazio porter the breena. The ignazio repossess the hatty. The hatty is not endodontic. The hatty repossess the greg. The hatty repossess the breena. The breena is not endodontic. The breena is not doddery. The breena repossess the hatty. The breena abduct the greg. If someone abduct the breena then the breena porter the hatty. If someone porter the hatty and the hatty is responsive then the hatty porter the ignazio. If someone abduct the ignazio and they do not see the ignazio then they see the breena. If someone porter the hatty then they like the ignazio. If someone abduct the hatty then they are responsive. If someone porter the ignazio then they are not responsive. If someone abduct the greg then they do not like the greg. If someone repossess the hatty and they are endodontic then the hatty does not like the breena. The greg is responsive.", "logic": "\nPorter(greg, ignazio)\nRepossess(greg, hatty)\nAbduct(greg, breena)\nPorter(ignazio, breena)\nRepossess(ignazio, hatty)\nnot Endodontic(hatty)\nRepossess(hatty, greg)\nRepossess(hatty, breena)\nnot Endodontic(breena)\nnot Doddery(breena)\nRepossess(breena, hatty)\nAbduct(breena, greg)\nforall x (Abduct(x, breena) -> Porter(breena, hatty))\nforall x (Porter(x, hatty) and Responsive(hatty) -> Porter(hatty, ignazio))\nforall x (Abduct(x, ignazio) and not Repossess(x, ignazio) -> Repossess(x, breena))\nforall x (Porter(x, hatty) -> Porter(x, ignazio))\nforall x (Abduct(x, hatty) -> Responsive(x))\nforall x (Porter(x, ignazio) -> not Responsive(x))\nforall x (Abduct(x, greg) -> not Porter(x, greg))\nforall x (Repossess(x, hatty) and Endodontic(x) -> not Porter(hatty, breena))\n\nResponsive(greg)\n\nPorter(greg, ignazio) and forall x (Porter(x, ignazio) -> not Responsive(x)) -> therefore not Responsive(greg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The matthiew crayon the madge. The matthiew jest the huntley. The matthiew claver the silva. The madge crayon the silva. The madge jest the huntley. The huntley is not expectant. The huntley jest the matthiew. The huntley jest the silva. The silva is not expectant. The silva is not susurrous. The silva jest the huntley. The silva claver the matthiew. If someone claver the silva then the silva crayon the huntley. If someone crayon the huntley and the huntley is excusatory then the huntley crayon the madge. If someone claver the madge and they do not see the madge then they see the silva. If someone crayon the huntley then they like the madge. If someone claver the huntley then they are excusatory. If someone crayon the madge then they are not excusatory. If someone claver the matthiew then they do not like the matthiew. If someone jest the huntley and they are expectant then the huntley does not like the silva. The silva crayon the madge.", "logic": "\nCrayon(matthiew, madge)\nJest(matthiew, huntley)\nClaver(matthiew, silva)\nCrayon(madge, silva)\nJest(madge, huntley)\nnot Expectant(huntley)\nJest(huntley, matthiew)\nJest(huntley, silva)\nnot Expectant(silva)\nnot Susurrous(silva)\nJest(silva, huntley)\nClaver(silva, matthiew)\nforall x (Claver(x, silva) -> Crayon(silva, huntley))\nforall x (Crayon(x, huntley) and Excusatory(huntley) -> Crayon(huntley, madge))\nforall x (Claver(x, madge) and not Jest(x, madge) -> Jest(x, silva))\nforall x (Crayon(x, huntley) -> Crayon(x, madge))\nforall x (Claver(x, huntley) -> Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Crayon(x, madge) -> not Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Claver(x, matthiew) -> not Crayon(x, matthiew))\nforall x (Jest(x, huntley) and Expectant(x) -> not Crayon(huntley, silva))\n\nCrayon(silva, madge)\n\nClaver(matthiew, silva) and forall x (Claver(x, silva) -> Crayon(silva, huntley)) -> therefore Crayon(silva, huntley) Crayon(silva, huntley) and forall x (Crayon(x, huntley) -> Crayon(x, madge)) -> therefore Crayon(silva, madge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The rae effectuate the ardyce. The rae wiggle the mellicent. The rae agnise the jamey. The ardyce effectuate the jamey. The ardyce wiggle the mellicent. The mellicent is not honeyed. The mellicent wiggle the rae. The mellicent wiggle the jamey. The jamey is not honeyed. The jamey is not admonitory. The jamey wiggle the mellicent. The jamey agnise the rae. If someone agnise the jamey then the jamey effectuate the mellicent. If someone effectuate the mellicent and the mellicent is bulbous then the mellicent effectuate the ardyce. If someone agnise the ardyce and they do not see the ardyce then they see the jamey. If someone effectuate the mellicent then they like the ardyce. If someone agnise the mellicent then they are bulbous. If someone effectuate the ardyce then they are not bulbous. If someone agnise the rae then they do not like the rae. If someone wiggle the mellicent and they are honeyed then the mellicent does not like the jamey. The jamey does not like the ardyce.", "logic": "\nEffectuate(rae, ardyce)\nWiggle(rae, mellicent)\nAgnise(rae, jamey)\nEffectuate(ardyce, jamey)\nWiggle(ardyce, mellicent)\nnot Honeyed(mellicent)\nWiggle(mellicent, rae)\nWiggle(mellicent, jamey)\nnot Honeyed(jamey)\nnot Admonitory(jamey)\nWiggle(jamey, mellicent)\nAgnise(jamey, rae)\nforall x (Agnise(x, jamey) -> Effectuate(jamey, mellicent))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, mellicent) and Bulbous(mellicent) -> Effectuate(mellicent, ardyce))\nforall x (Agnise(x, ardyce) and not Wiggle(x, ardyce) -> Wiggle(x, jamey))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, mellicent) -> Effectuate(x, ardyce))\nforall x (Agnise(x, mellicent) -> Bulbous(x))\nforall x (Effectuate(x, ardyce) -> not Bulbous(x))\nforall x (Agnise(x, rae) -> not Effectuate(x, rae))\nforall x (Wiggle(x, mellicent) and Honeyed(x) -> not Effectuate(mellicent, jamey))\n\nnot Effectuate(jamey, ardyce)\n\nAgnise(rae, jamey) and forall x (Agnise(x, jamey) -> Effectuate(jamey, mellicent)) -> therefore Effectuate(jamey, mellicent) Effectuate(jamey, mellicent) and forall x (Effectuate(x, mellicent) -> Effectuate(x, ardyce)) -> therefore Effectuate(jamey, ardyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The martie beseech the dierdre. The martie convect the fredrick. The martie demur the bessy. The dierdre beseech the bessy. The dierdre convect the fredrick. The fredrick is not bicorn. The fredrick convect the martie. The fredrick convect the bessy. The bessy is not bicorn. The bessy is not glary. The bessy convect the fredrick. The bessy demur the martie. If someone demur the bessy then the bessy beseech the fredrick. If someone beseech the fredrick and the fredrick is freakish then the fredrick beseech the dierdre. If someone demur the dierdre and they do not see the dierdre then they see the bessy. If someone beseech the fredrick then they like the dierdre. If someone demur the fredrick then they are freakish. If someone beseech the dierdre then they are not freakish. If someone demur the martie then they do not like the martie. If someone convect the fredrick and they are bicorn then the fredrick does not like the bessy. The bessy is not freakish.", "logic": "\nBeseech(martie, dierdre)\nConvect(martie, fredrick)\nDemur(martie, bessy)\nBeseech(dierdre, bessy)\nConvect(dierdre, fredrick)\nnot Bicorn(fredrick)\nConvect(fredrick, martie)\nConvect(fredrick, bessy)\nnot Bicorn(bessy)\nnot Glary(bessy)\nConvect(bessy, fredrick)\nDemur(bessy, martie)\nforall x (Demur(x, bessy) -> Beseech(bessy, fredrick))\nforall x (Beseech(x, fredrick) and Freakish(fredrick) -> Beseech(fredrick, dierdre))\nforall x (Demur(x, dierdre) and not Convect(x, dierdre) -> Convect(x, bessy))\nforall x (Beseech(x, fredrick) -> Beseech(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Demur(x, fredrick) -> Freakish(x))\nforall x (Beseech(x, dierdre) -> not Freakish(x))\nforall x (Demur(x, martie) -> not Beseech(x, martie))\nforall x (Convect(x, fredrick) and Bicorn(x) -> not Beseech(fredrick, bessy))\n\nnot Freakish(bessy)\n\nDemur(martie, bessy) and forall x (Demur(x, bessy) -> Beseech(bessy, fredrick)) -> therefore Beseech(bessy, fredrick) Beseech(bessy, fredrick) and forall x (Beseech(x, fredrick) -> Beseech(x, dierdre)) -> therefore Beseech(bessy, dierdre) Beseech(bessy, dierdre) and forall x (Beseech(x, dierdre) -> not Freakish(x)) -> therefore not Freakish(bessy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The deane knife the jemmie. The deane sublease the marys. The deane occlude the shellie. The jemmie knife the shellie. The jemmie sublease the marys. The marys is not maddened. The marys sublease the deane. The marys sublease the shellie. The shellie is not maddened. The shellie is not bisexual. The shellie sublease the marys. The shellie occlude the deane. If someone occlude the shellie then the shellie knife the marys. If someone knife the marys and the marys is augmented then the marys knife the jemmie. If someone occlude the jemmie and they do not see the jemmie then they see the shellie. If someone knife the marys then they like the jemmie. If someone occlude the marys then they are augmented. If someone knife the jemmie then they are not augmented. If someone occlude the deane then they do not like the deane. If someone sublease the marys and they are maddened then the marys does not like the shellie. The shellie is augmented.", "logic": "\nKnife(deane, jemmie)\nSublease(deane, marys)\nOcclude(deane, shellie)\nKnife(jemmie, shellie)\nSublease(jemmie, marys)\nnot Maddened(marys)\nSublease(marys, deane)\nSublease(marys, shellie)\nnot Maddened(shellie)\nnot Bisexual(shellie)\nSublease(shellie, marys)\nOcclude(shellie, deane)\nforall x (Occlude(x, shellie) -> Knife(shellie, marys))\nforall x (Knife(x, marys) and Augmented(marys) -> Knife(marys, jemmie))\nforall x (Occlude(x, jemmie) and not Sublease(x, jemmie) -> Sublease(x, shellie))\nforall x (Knife(x, marys) -> Knife(x, jemmie))\nforall x (Occlude(x, marys) -> Augmented(x))\nforall x (Knife(x, jemmie) -> not Augmented(x))\nforall x (Occlude(x, deane) -> not Knife(x, deane))\nforall x (Sublease(x, marys) and Maddened(x) -> not Knife(marys, shellie))\n\nAugmented(shellie)\n\nOcclude(deane, shellie) and forall x (Occlude(x, shellie) -> Knife(shellie, marys)) -> therefore Knife(shellie, marys) Knife(shellie, marys) and forall x (Knife(x, marys) -> Knife(x, jemmie)) -> therefore Knife(shellie, jemmie) Knife(shellie, jemmie) and forall x (Knife(x, jemmie) -> not Augmented(x)) -> therefore not Augmented(shellie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The serge golf the florenza. The serge greet the fidel. The serge hoodwink the connolly. The florenza golf the connolly. The florenza greet the fidel. The fidel is not pouring. The fidel greet the serge. The fidel greet the connolly. The connolly is not pouring. The connolly is not imbecile. The connolly greet the fidel. The connolly hoodwink the serge. If someone hoodwink the connolly then the connolly golf the fidel. If someone golf the fidel and the fidel is papistic then the fidel golf the florenza. If someone hoodwink the florenza and they do not see the florenza then they see the connolly. If someone golf the fidel then they like the florenza. If someone hoodwink the fidel then they are papistic. If someone golf the florenza then they are not papistic. If someone hoodwink the serge then they do not like the serge. If someone greet the fidel and they are pouring then the fidel does not like the connolly. The fidel is not papistic.", "logic": "\nGolf(serge, florenza)\nGreet(serge, fidel)\nHoodwink(serge, connolly)\nGolf(florenza, connolly)\nGreet(florenza, fidel)\nnot Pouring(fidel)\nGreet(fidel, serge)\nGreet(fidel, connolly)\nnot Pouring(connolly)\nnot Imbecile(connolly)\nGreet(connolly, fidel)\nHoodwink(connolly, serge)\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, connolly) -> Golf(connolly, fidel))\nforall x (Golf(x, fidel) and Papistic(fidel) -> Golf(fidel, florenza))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, florenza) and not Greet(x, florenza) -> Greet(x, connolly))\nforall x (Golf(x, fidel) -> Golf(x, florenza))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, fidel) -> Papistic(x))\nforall x (Golf(x, florenza) -> not Papistic(x))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, serge) -> not Golf(x, serge))\nforall x (Greet(x, fidel) and Pouring(x) -> not Golf(fidel, connolly))\n\nnot Papistic(fidel)\n\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, fidel) -> Papistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The arthur implant the hanna. The arthur filiate the whitney. The arthur crank the lizzy. The hanna implant the lizzy. The hanna filiate the whitney. The whitney is not zodiacal. The whitney filiate the arthur. The whitney filiate the lizzy. The lizzy is not zodiacal. The lizzy is not caudated. The lizzy filiate the whitney. The lizzy crank the arthur. If someone crank the lizzy then the lizzy implant the whitney. If someone implant the whitney and the whitney is noseless then the whitney implant the hanna. If someone crank the hanna and they do not see the hanna then they see the lizzy. If someone implant the whitney then they like the hanna. If someone crank the whitney then they are noseless. If someone implant the hanna then they are not noseless. If someone crank the arthur then they do not like the arthur. If someone filiate the whitney and they are zodiacal then the whitney does not like the lizzy. The hanna is noseless.", "logic": "\nImplant(arthur, hanna)\nFiliate(arthur, whitney)\nCrank(arthur, lizzy)\nImplant(hanna, lizzy)\nFiliate(hanna, whitney)\nnot Zodiacal(whitney)\nFiliate(whitney, arthur)\nFiliate(whitney, lizzy)\nnot Zodiacal(lizzy)\nnot Caudated(lizzy)\nFiliate(lizzy, whitney)\nCrank(lizzy, arthur)\nforall x (Crank(x, lizzy) -> Implant(lizzy, whitney))\nforall x (Implant(x, whitney) and Noseless(whitney) -> Implant(whitney, hanna))\nforall x (Crank(x, hanna) and not Filiate(x, hanna) -> Filiate(x, lizzy))\nforall x (Implant(x, whitney) -> Implant(x, hanna))\nforall x (Crank(x, whitney) -> Noseless(x))\nforall x (Implant(x, hanna) -> not Noseless(x))\nforall x (Crank(x, arthur) -> not Implant(x, arthur))\nforall x (Filiate(x, whitney) and Zodiacal(x) -> not Implant(whitney, lizzy))\n\nNoseless(hanna)\n\nforall x (Crank(x, whitney) -> Noseless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The una unsex the jenna. The una align the shannen. The una deaf the danie. The jenna unsex the danie. The jenna align the shannen. The shannen is not omniscient. The shannen align the una. The shannen align the danie. The danie is not omniscient. The danie is not engaged. The danie align the shannen. The danie deaf the una. If someone deaf the danie then the danie unsex the shannen. If someone unsex the shannen and the shannen is aroused then the shannen unsex the jenna. If someone deaf the jenna and they do not see the jenna then they see the danie. If someone unsex the shannen then they like the jenna. If someone deaf the shannen then they are aroused. If someone unsex the jenna then they are not aroused. If someone deaf the una then they do not like the una. If someone align the shannen and they are omniscient then the shannen does not like the danie. The shannen does not like the jenna.", "logic": "\nUnsex(una, jenna)\nAlign(una, shannen)\nDeaf(una, danie)\nUnsex(jenna, danie)\nAlign(jenna, shannen)\nnot Omniscient(shannen)\nAlign(shannen, una)\nAlign(shannen, danie)\nnot Omniscient(danie)\nnot Engaged(danie)\nAlign(danie, shannen)\nDeaf(danie, una)\nforall x (Deaf(x, danie) -> Unsex(danie, shannen))\nforall x (Unsex(x, shannen) and Aroused(shannen) -> Unsex(shannen, jenna))\nforall x (Deaf(x, jenna) and not Align(x, jenna) -> Align(x, danie))\nforall x (Unsex(x, shannen) -> Unsex(x, jenna))\nforall x (Deaf(x, shannen) -> Aroused(x))\nforall x (Unsex(x, jenna) -> not Aroused(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x, una) -> not Unsex(x, una))\nforall x (Align(x, shannen) and Omniscient(x) -> not Unsex(shannen, danie))\n\nnot Unsex(shannen, jenna)\n\nforall x (Unsex(x, shannen) and Aroused(shannen) -> Unsex(shannen, jenna)) <- forall x (Deaf(x, shannen) -> Aroused(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The hannibal convert the nessi. The hannibal pestle the winfred. The hannibal deoxidise the alford. The nessi convert the alford. The nessi pestle the winfred. The winfred is not orange. The winfred pestle the hannibal. The winfred pestle the alford. The alford is not orange. The alford is not loosened. The alford pestle the winfred. The alford deoxidise the hannibal. If someone deoxidise the alford then the alford convert the winfred. If someone convert the winfred and the winfred is ripened then the winfred convert the nessi. If someone deoxidise the nessi and they do not see the nessi then they see the alford. If someone convert the winfred then they like the nessi. If someone deoxidise the winfred then they are ripened. If someone convert the nessi then they are not ripened. If someone deoxidise the hannibal then they do not like the hannibal. If someone pestle the winfred and they are orange then the winfred does not like the alford. The alford pestle the alford.", "logic": "\nConvert(hannibal, nessi)\nPestle(hannibal, winfred)\nDeoxidise(hannibal, alford)\nConvert(nessi, alford)\nPestle(nessi, winfred)\nnot Orange(winfred)\nPestle(winfred, hannibal)\nPestle(winfred, alford)\nnot Orange(alford)\nnot Loosened(alford)\nPestle(alford, winfred)\nDeoxidise(alford, hannibal)\nforall x (Deoxidise(x, alford) -> Convert(alford, winfred))\nforall x (Convert(x, winfred) and Ripened(winfred) -> Convert(winfred, nessi))\nforall x (Deoxidise(x, nessi) and not Pestle(x, nessi) -> Pestle(x, alford))\nforall x (Convert(x, winfred) -> Convert(x, nessi))\nforall x (Deoxidise(x, winfred) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Convert(x, nessi) -> not Ripened(x))\nforall x (Deoxidise(x, hannibal) -> not Convert(x, hannibal))\nforall x (Pestle(x, winfred) and Orange(x) -> not Convert(winfred, alford))\n\nPestle(alford, alford)\n\nforall x (Deoxidise(x, nessi) and not Pestle(x, nessi) -> Pestle(x, alford)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The micheal spurn the annice. The micheal refresh the caleb. The micheal revile the wylie. The annice spurn the wylie. The annice refresh the caleb. The caleb is not genteel. The caleb refresh the micheal. The caleb refresh the wylie. The wylie is not genteel. The wylie is not scheming. The wylie refresh the caleb. The wylie revile the micheal. If someone revile the wylie then the wylie spurn the caleb. If someone spurn the caleb and the caleb is thin then the caleb spurn the annice. If someone revile the annice and they do not see the annice then they see the wylie. If someone spurn the caleb then they like the annice. If someone revile the caleb then they are thin. If someone spurn the annice then they are not thin. If someone revile the micheal then they do not like the micheal. If someone refresh the caleb and they are genteel then the caleb does not like the wylie. The wylie does not like the wylie.", "logic": "\nSpurn(micheal, annice)\nRefresh(micheal, caleb)\nRevile(micheal, wylie)\nSpurn(annice, wylie)\nRefresh(annice, caleb)\nnot Genteel(caleb)\nRefresh(caleb, micheal)\nRefresh(caleb, wylie)\nnot Genteel(wylie)\nnot Scheming(wylie)\nRefresh(wylie, caleb)\nRevile(wylie, micheal)\nforall x (Revile(x, wylie) -> Spurn(wylie, caleb))\nforall x (Spurn(x, caleb) and Thin(caleb) -> Spurn(caleb, annice))\nforall x (Revile(x, annice) and not Refresh(x, annice) -> Refresh(x, wylie))\nforall x (Spurn(x, caleb) -> Spurn(x, annice))\nforall x (Revile(x, caleb) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Spurn(x, annice) -> not Thin(x))\nforall x (Revile(x, micheal) -> not Spurn(x, micheal))\nforall x (Refresh(x, caleb) and Genteel(x) -> not Spurn(caleb, wylie))\n\nnot Spurn(wylie, wylie)\n\nnot Spurn(wylie, wylie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The jamey tweet the rolf. The jamey abominate the myles. The jamey bunch the martie. The rolf tweet the martie. The rolf abominate the myles. The myles is not disyllabic. The myles abominate the jamey. The myles abominate the martie. The martie is not disyllabic. The martie is not anti. The martie abominate the myles. The martie bunch the jamey. If someone bunch the martie then the martie tweet the myles. If someone tweet the myles and the myles is millenary then the myles tweet the rolf. If someone bunch the rolf and they do not see the rolf then they see the martie. If someone tweet the myles then they like the rolf. If someone bunch the myles then they are millenary. If someone tweet the rolf then they are not millenary. If someone bunch the jamey then they do not like the jamey. If someone abominate the myles and they are disyllabic then the myles does not like the martie. The myles tweet the jamey.", "logic": "\nTweet(jamey, rolf)\nAbominate(jamey, myles)\nBunch(jamey, martie)\nTweet(rolf, martie)\nAbominate(rolf, myles)\nnot Disyllabic(myles)\nAbominate(myles, jamey)\nAbominate(myles, martie)\nnot Disyllabic(martie)\nnot Anti(martie)\nAbominate(martie, myles)\nBunch(martie, jamey)\nforall x (Bunch(x, martie) -> Tweet(martie, myles))\nforall x (Tweet(x, myles) and Millenary(myles) -> Tweet(myles, rolf))\nforall x (Bunch(x, rolf) and not Abominate(x, rolf) -> Abominate(x, martie))\nforall x (Tweet(x, myles) -> Tweet(x, rolf))\nforall x (Bunch(x, myles) -> Millenary(x))\nforall x (Tweet(x, rolf) -> not Millenary(x))\nforall x (Bunch(x, jamey) -> not Tweet(x, jamey))\nforall x (Abominate(x, myles) and Disyllabic(x) -> not Tweet(myles, martie))\n\nTweet(myles, jamey)\n\nTweet(myles, jamey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The cassandry typify the mervin. The cassandry paganise the tait. The cassandry redouble the phip. The mervin typify the phip. The mervin paganise the tait. The tait is not peaked. The tait paganise the cassandry. The tait paganise the phip. The phip is not peaked. The phip is not unsigned. The phip paganise the tait. The phip redouble the cassandry. If someone redouble the phip then the phip typify the tait. If someone typify the tait and the tait is uncovered then the tait typify the mervin. If someone redouble the mervin and they do not see the mervin then they see the phip. If someone typify the tait then they like the mervin. If someone redouble the tait then they are uncovered. If someone typify the mervin then they are not uncovered. If someone redouble the cassandry then they do not like the cassandry. If someone paganise the tait and they are peaked then the tait does not like the phip. The tait does not see the tait.", "logic": "\nTypify(cassandry, mervin)\nPaganise(cassandry, tait)\nRedouble(cassandry, phip)\nTypify(mervin, phip)\nPaganise(mervin, tait)\nnot Peaked(tait)\nPaganise(tait, cassandry)\nPaganise(tait, phip)\nnot Peaked(phip)\nnot Unsigned(phip)\nPaganise(phip, tait)\nRedouble(phip, cassandry)\nforall x (Redouble(x, phip) -> Typify(phip, tait))\nforall x (Typify(x, tait) and Uncovered(tait) -> Typify(tait, mervin))\nforall x (Redouble(x, mervin) and not Paganise(x, mervin) -> Paganise(x, phip))\nforall x (Typify(x, tait) -> Typify(x, mervin))\nforall x (Redouble(x, tait) -> Uncovered(x))\nforall x (Typify(x, mervin) -> not Uncovered(x))\nforall x (Redouble(x, cassandry) -> not Typify(x, cassandry))\nforall x (Paganise(x, tait) and Peaked(x) -> not Typify(tait, phip))\n\nnot Paganise(tait, tait)\n\nnot Paganise(tait, tait) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The eloisa notarise the barr. The eloisa gurgle the calley. The eloisa revenge the carline. The barr notarise the carline. The barr gurgle the calley. The calley is not balconied. The calley gurgle the eloisa. The calley gurgle the carline. The carline is not balconied. The carline is not lashing. The carline gurgle the calley. The carline revenge the eloisa. If someone revenge the carline then the carline notarise the calley. If someone notarise the calley and the calley is pinnated then the calley notarise the barr. If someone revenge the barr and they do not see the barr then they see the carline. If someone notarise the calley then they like the barr. If someone revenge the calley then they are pinnated. If someone notarise the barr then they are not pinnated. If someone revenge the eloisa then they do not like the eloisa. If someone gurgle the calley and they are balconied then the calley does not like the carline. The carline gurgle the eloisa.", "logic": "\nNotarise(eloisa, barr)\nGurgle(eloisa, calley)\nRevenge(eloisa, carline)\nNotarise(barr, carline)\nGurgle(barr, calley)\nnot Balconied(calley)\nGurgle(calley, eloisa)\nGurgle(calley, carline)\nnot Balconied(carline)\nnot Lashing(carline)\nGurgle(carline, calley)\nRevenge(carline, eloisa)\nforall x (Revenge(x, carline) -> Notarise(carline, calley))\nforall x (Notarise(x, calley) and Pinnated(calley) -> Notarise(calley, barr))\nforall x (Revenge(x, barr) and not Gurgle(x, barr) -> Gurgle(x, carline))\nforall x (Notarise(x, calley) -> Notarise(x, barr))\nforall x (Revenge(x, calley) -> Pinnated(x))\nforall x (Notarise(x, barr) -> not Pinnated(x))\nforall x (Revenge(x, eloisa) -> not Notarise(x, eloisa))\nforall x (Gurgle(x, calley) and Balconied(x) -> not Notarise(calley, carline))\n\nGurgle(carline, eloisa)\n\nGurgle(carline, eloisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1416"} {"premises": "The consuelo circumvent the coreen. The consuelo is umpteenth. The consuelo is dissolute. The consuelo is enkindled. The consuelo trivialise the coreen. The consuelo wawl the coreen. The coreen circumvent the consuelo. The coreen is tapering. The coreen is dissolute. The coreen is enkindled. The coreen trivialise the consuelo. The coreen wawl the consuelo. If the coreen circumvent the consuelo then the consuelo trivialise the coreen. If something wawl the consuelo and the consuelo is tapering then the consuelo trivialise the coreen. If something is tapering then it trivialise the consuelo. If something circumvent the consuelo then it wawl the coreen. If something wawl the coreen then it is tapering. If something trivialise the consuelo and the consuelo wawl the coreen then it circumvent the coreen. If the consuelo is dissolute and the consuelo trivialise the coreen then the consuelo wawl the coreen. If something trivialise the coreen then it circumvent the consuelo. The coreen is dissolute.", "logic": "\nCircumvent(consuelo, coreen)\nUmpteenth(consuelo)\nDissolute(consuelo)\nEnkindled(consuelo)\nTrivialise(consuelo, coreen)\nWawl(consuelo, coreen)\nCircumvent(coreen, consuelo)\nTapering(coreen)\nDissolute(coreen)\nEnkindled(coreen)\nTrivialise(coreen, consuelo)\nWawl(coreen, consuelo)\nCircumvent(coreen, consuelo) -> Trivialise(consuelo, coreen)\nforall x (Wawl(x, consuelo) and Tapering(consuelo) -> Trivialise(consuelo, coreen))\nforall x (Tapering(x) -> Trivialise(x, consuelo))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, consuelo) -> Wawl(x, coreen))\nforall x (Wawl(x, coreen) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Trivialise(x, consuelo) and Wawl(consuelo, coreen) -> Circumvent(x, coreen))\nDissolute(consuelo) and Trivialise(consuelo, coreen) -> Wawl(consuelo, coreen)\nforall x (Trivialise(x, coreen) -> Circumvent(x, consuelo))\n\nDissolute(coreen)\n\ntherefore Dissolute(coreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The saw factorize the selma. The saw is voltarean. The saw is straying. The saw is graphic. The saw shrug the selma. The saw bewhisker the selma. The selma factorize the saw. The selma is decussate. The selma is straying. The selma is graphic. The selma shrug the saw. The selma bewhisker the saw. If the selma factorize the saw then the saw shrug the selma. If something bewhisker the saw and the saw is decussate then the saw shrug the selma. If something is decussate then it shrug the saw. If something factorize the saw then it bewhisker the selma. If something bewhisker the selma then it is decussate. If something shrug the saw and the saw bewhisker the selma then it factorize the selma. If the saw is straying and the saw shrug the selma then the saw bewhisker the selma. If something shrug the selma then it factorize the saw. The selma is not graphic.", "logic": "\nFactorize(saw, selma)\nVoltarean(saw)\nStraying(saw)\nGraphic(saw)\nShrug(saw, selma)\nBewhisker(saw, selma)\nFactorize(selma, saw)\nDecussate(selma)\nStraying(selma)\nGraphic(selma)\nShrug(selma, saw)\nBewhisker(selma, saw)\nFactorize(selma, saw) -> Shrug(saw, selma)\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, saw) and Decussate(saw) -> Shrug(saw, selma))\nforall x (Decussate(x) -> Shrug(x, saw))\nforall x (Factorize(x, saw) -> Bewhisker(x, selma))\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, selma) -> Decussate(x))\nforall x (Shrug(x, saw) and Bewhisker(saw, selma) -> Factorize(x, selma))\nStraying(saw) and Shrug(saw, selma) -> Bewhisker(saw, selma)\nforall x (Shrug(x, selma) -> Factorize(x, saw))\n\nnot Graphic(selma)\n\ntherefore Graphic(selma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The ula agnize the willow. The ula is dizygotic. The ula is taxonomic. The ula is peregrine. The ula morph the willow. The ula befuddle the willow. The willow agnize the ula. The willow is lvii. The willow is taxonomic. The willow is peregrine. The willow morph the ula. The willow befuddle the ula. If the willow agnize the ula then the ula morph the willow. If something befuddle the ula and the ula is lvii then the ula morph the willow. If something is lvii then it morph the ula. If something agnize the ula then it befuddle the willow. If something befuddle the willow then it is lvii. If something morph the ula and the ula befuddle the willow then it agnize the willow. If the ula is taxonomic and the ula morph the willow then the ula befuddle the willow. If something morph the willow then it agnize the ula. The ula agnize the ula.", "logic": "\nAgnize(ula, willow)\nDizygotic(ula)\nTaxonomic(ula)\nPeregrine(ula)\nMorph(ula, willow)\nBefuddle(ula, willow)\nAgnize(willow, ula)\nLvii(willow)\nTaxonomic(willow)\nPeregrine(willow)\nMorph(willow, ula)\nBefuddle(willow, ula)\nAgnize(willow, ula) -> Morph(ula, willow)\nforall x (Befuddle(x, ula) and Lvii(ula) -> Morph(ula, willow))\nforall x (Lvii(x) -> Morph(x, ula))\nforall x (Agnize(x, ula) -> Befuddle(x, willow))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, willow) -> Lvii(x))\nforall x (Morph(x, ula) and Befuddle(ula, willow) -> Agnize(x, willow))\nTaxonomic(ula) and Morph(ula, willow) -> Befuddle(ula, willow)\nforall x (Morph(x, willow) -> Agnize(x, ula))\n\nAgnize(ula, ula)\n\nMorph(ula, willow) and forall x (Morph(x, willow) -> Agnize(x, ula)) -> therefore Agnize(ula, ula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The renault overawe the brittney. The renault is boon. The renault is phagocytic. The renault is military. The renault vaporize the brittney. The renault motorboat the brittney. The brittney overawe the renault. The brittney is squat. The brittney is phagocytic. The brittney is military. The brittney vaporize the renault. The brittney motorboat the renault. If the brittney overawe the renault then the renault vaporize the brittney. If something motorboat the renault and the renault is squat then the renault vaporize the brittney. If something is squat then it vaporize the renault. If something overawe the renault then it motorboat the brittney. If something motorboat the brittney then it is squat. If something vaporize the renault and the renault motorboat the brittney then it overawe the brittney. If the renault is phagocytic and the renault vaporize the brittney then the renault motorboat the brittney. If something vaporize the brittney then it overawe the renault. The brittney does not chase the brittney.", "logic": "\nOverawe(renault, brittney)\nBoon(renault)\nPhagocytic(renault)\nMilitary(renault)\nVaporize(renault, brittney)\nMotorboat(renault, brittney)\nOverawe(brittney, renault)\nSquat(brittney)\nPhagocytic(brittney)\nMilitary(brittney)\nVaporize(brittney, renault)\nMotorboat(brittney, renault)\nOverawe(brittney, renault) -> Vaporize(renault, brittney)\nforall x (Motorboat(x, renault) and Squat(renault) -> Vaporize(renault, brittney))\nforall x (Squat(x) -> Vaporize(x, renault))\nforall x (Overawe(x, renault) -> Motorboat(x, brittney))\nforall x (Motorboat(x, brittney) -> Squat(x))\nforall x (Vaporize(x, renault) and Motorboat(renault, brittney) -> Overawe(x, brittney))\nPhagocytic(renault) and Vaporize(renault, brittney) -> Motorboat(renault, brittney)\nforall x (Vaporize(x, brittney) -> Overawe(x, renault))\n\nnot Overawe(brittney, brittney)\n\nVaporize(brittney, renault) and Motorboat(renault, brittney) and forall x (Vaporize(x, renault) and Motorboat(renault, brittney) -> Overawe(x, brittney)) -> therefore Overawe(brittney, brittney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The haleigh knife the nertie. The haleigh is humanistic. The haleigh is mitotic. The haleigh is chockful. The haleigh chelate the nertie. The haleigh banter the nertie. The nertie knife the haleigh. The nertie is catching. The nertie is mitotic. The nertie is chockful. The nertie chelate the haleigh. The nertie banter the haleigh. If the nertie knife the haleigh then the haleigh chelate the nertie. If something banter the haleigh and the haleigh is catching then the haleigh chelate the nertie. If something is catching then it chelate the haleigh. If something knife the haleigh then it banter the nertie. If something banter the nertie then it is catching. If something chelate the haleigh and the haleigh banter the nertie then it knife the nertie. If the haleigh is mitotic and the haleigh chelate the nertie then the haleigh banter the nertie. If something chelate the nertie then it knife the haleigh. The haleigh chelate the haleigh.", "logic": "\nKnife(haleigh, nertie)\nHumanistic(haleigh)\nMitotic(haleigh)\nChockful(haleigh)\nChelate(haleigh, nertie)\nBanter(haleigh, nertie)\nKnife(nertie, haleigh)\nCatching(nertie)\nMitotic(nertie)\nChockful(nertie)\nChelate(nertie, haleigh)\nBanter(nertie, haleigh)\nKnife(nertie, haleigh) -> Chelate(haleigh, nertie)\nforall x (Banter(x, haleigh) and Catching(haleigh) -> Chelate(haleigh, nertie))\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Chelate(x, haleigh))\nforall x (Knife(x, haleigh) -> Banter(x, nertie))\nforall x (Banter(x, nertie) -> Catching(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x, haleigh) and Banter(haleigh, nertie) -> Knife(x, nertie))\nMitotic(haleigh) and Chelate(haleigh, nertie) -> Banter(haleigh, nertie)\nforall x (Chelate(x, nertie) -> Knife(x, haleigh))\n\nChelate(haleigh, haleigh)\n\nBanter(haleigh, nertie) and forall x (Banter(x, nertie) -> Catching(x)) -> therefore Catching(haleigh) Catching(haleigh) and forall x (Catching(x) -> Chelate(x, haleigh)) -> therefore Chelate(haleigh, haleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The susannah incur the jonie. The susannah is scots. The susannah is unseemly. The susannah is bivariate. The susannah exhaust the jonie. The susannah bluster the jonie. The jonie incur the susannah. The jonie is lxxvi. The jonie is unseemly. The jonie is bivariate. The jonie exhaust the susannah. The jonie bluster the susannah. If the jonie incur the susannah then the susannah exhaust the jonie. If something bluster the susannah and the susannah is lxxvi then the susannah exhaust the jonie. If something is lxxvi then it exhaust the susannah. If something incur the susannah then it bluster the jonie. If something bluster the jonie then it is lxxvi. If something exhaust the susannah and the susannah bluster the jonie then it incur the jonie. If the susannah is unseemly and the susannah exhaust the jonie then the susannah bluster the jonie. If something exhaust the jonie then it incur the susannah. The susannah does not need the susannah.", "logic": "\nIncur(susannah, jonie)\nScots(susannah)\nUnseemly(susannah)\nBivariate(susannah)\nExhaust(susannah, jonie)\nBluster(susannah, jonie)\nIncur(jonie, susannah)\nLxxvi(jonie)\nUnseemly(jonie)\nBivariate(jonie)\nExhaust(jonie, susannah)\nBluster(jonie, susannah)\nIncur(jonie, susannah) -> Exhaust(susannah, jonie)\nforall x (Bluster(x, susannah) and Lxxvi(susannah) -> Exhaust(susannah, jonie))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Exhaust(x, susannah))\nforall x (Incur(x, susannah) -> Bluster(x, jonie))\nforall x (Bluster(x, jonie) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, susannah) and Bluster(susannah, jonie) -> Incur(x, jonie))\nUnseemly(susannah) and Exhaust(susannah, jonie) -> Bluster(susannah, jonie)\nforall x (Exhaust(x, jonie) -> Incur(x, susannah))\n\nnot Exhaust(susannah, susannah)\n\nBluster(susannah, jonie) and forall x (Bluster(x, jonie) -> Lxxvi(x)) -> therefore Lxxvi(susannah) Lxxvi(susannah) and forall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Exhaust(x, susannah)) -> therefore Exhaust(susannah, susannah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The calla shark the tod. The calla is splashy. The calla is euphonious. The calla is sissyish. The calla necrose the tod. The calla outfight the tod. The tod shark the calla. The tod is awaited. The tod is euphonious. The tod is sissyish. The tod necrose the calla. The tod outfight the calla. If the tod shark the calla then the calla necrose the tod. If something outfight the calla and the calla is awaited then the calla necrose the tod. If something is awaited then it necrose the calla. If something shark the calla then it outfight the tod. If something outfight the tod then it is awaited. If something necrose the calla and the calla outfight the tod then it shark the tod. If the calla is euphonious and the calla necrose the tod then the calla outfight the tod. If something necrose the tod then it shark the calla. The tod does not need the tod.", "logic": "\nShark(calla, tod)\nSplashy(calla)\nEuphonious(calla)\nSissyish(calla)\nNecrose(calla, tod)\nOutfight(calla, tod)\nShark(tod, calla)\nAwaited(tod)\nEuphonious(tod)\nSissyish(tod)\nNecrose(tod, calla)\nOutfight(tod, calla)\nShark(tod, calla) -> Necrose(calla, tod)\nforall x (Outfight(x, calla) and Awaited(calla) -> Necrose(calla, tod))\nforall x (Awaited(x) -> Necrose(x, calla))\nforall x (Shark(x, calla) -> Outfight(x, tod))\nforall x (Outfight(x, tod) -> Awaited(x))\nforall x (Necrose(x, calla) and Outfight(calla, tod) -> Shark(x, tod))\nEuphonious(calla) and Necrose(calla, tod) -> Outfight(calla, tod)\nforall x (Necrose(x, tod) -> Shark(x, calla))\n\nnot Necrose(tod, tod)\n\nnot Necrose(tod, tod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The kandace stratify the minnie. The kandace is coplanar. The kandace is ladylike. The kandace is indistinct. The kandace chatter the minnie. The kandace purl the minnie. The minnie stratify the kandace. The minnie is atheistic. The minnie is ladylike. The minnie is indistinct. The minnie chatter the kandace. The minnie purl the kandace. If the minnie stratify the kandace then the kandace chatter the minnie. If something purl the kandace and the kandace is atheistic then the kandace chatter the minnie. If something is atheistic then it chatter the kandace. If something stratify the kandace then it purl the minnie. If something purl the minnie then it is atheistic. If something chatter the kandace and the kandace purl the minnie then it stratify the minnie. If the kandace is ladylike and the kandace chatter the minnie then the kandace purl the minnie. If something chatter the minnie then it stratify the kandace. The kandace is big.", "logic": "\nStratify(kandace, minnie)\nCoplanar(kandace)\nLadylike(kandace)\nIndistinct(kandace)\nChatter(kandace, minnie)\nPurl(kandace, minnie)\nStratify(minnie, kandace)\nAtheistic(minnie)\nLadylike(minnie)\nIndistinct(minnie)\nChatter(minnie, kandace)\nPurl(minnie, kandace)\nStratify(minnie, kandace) -> Chatter(kandace, minnie)\nforall x (Purl(x, kandace) and Atheistic(kandace) -> Chatter(kandace, minnie))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) -> Chatter(x, kandace))\nforall x (Stratify(x, kandace) -> Purl(x, minnie))\nforall x (Purl(x, minnie) -> Atheistic(x))\nforall x (Chatter(x, kandace) and Purl(kandace, minnie) -> Stratify(x, minnie))\nLadylike(kandace) and Chatter(kandace, minnie) -> Purl(kandace, minnie)\nforall x (Chatter(x, minnie) -> Stratify(x, kandace))\n\nBig(kandace)\n\nBig(kandace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The rem leech the donella. The rem is bilobated. The rem is fiddling. The rem is counter. The rem loft the donella. The rem cube the donella. The donella leech the rem. The donella is cankerous. The donella is fiddling. The donella is counter. The donella loft the rem. The donella cube the rem. If the donella leech the rem then the rem loft the donella. If something cube the rem and the rem is cankerous then the rem loft the donella. If something is cankerous then it loft the rem. If something leech the rem then it cube the donella. If something cube the donella then it is cankerous. If something loft the rem and the rem cube the donella then it leech the donella. If the rem is fiddling and the rem loft the donella then the rem cube the donella. If something loft the donella then it leech the rem. The donella is not big.", "logic": "\nLeech(rem, donella)\nBilobated(rem)\nFiddling(rem)\nCounter(rem)\nLoft(rem, donella)\nCube(rem, donella)\nLeech(donella, rem)\nCankerous(donella)\nFiddling(donella)\nCounter(donella)\nLoft(donella, rem)\nCube(donella, rem)\nLeech(donella, rem) -> Loft(rem, donella)\nforall x (Cube(x, rem) and Cankerous(rem) -> Loft(rem, donella))\nforall x (Cankerous(x) -> Loft(x, rem))\nforall x (Leech(x, rem) -> Cube(x, donella))\nforall x (Cube(x, donella) -> Cankerous(x))\nforall x (Loft(x, rem) and Cube(rem, donella) -> Leech(x, donella))\nFiddling(rem) and Loft(rem, donella) -> Cube(rem, donella)\nforall x (Loft(x, donella) -> Leech(x, rem))\n\nnot Big(donella)\n\nnot Big(donella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "The francesca chock the sammy. The francesca is sozzled. The francesca is roaring. The francesca is dainty. The francesca slue the sammy. The francesca cark the sammy. The sammy chock the francesca. The sammy is aplitic. The sammy is roaring. The sammy is dainty. The sammy slue the francesca. The sammy cark the francesca. If the sammy chock the francesca then the francesca slue the sammy. If something cark the francesca and the francesca is aplitic then the francesca slue the sammy. If something is aplitic then it slue the francesca. If something chock the francesca then it cark the sammy. If something cark the sammy then it is aplitic. If something slue the francesca and the francesca cark the sammy then it chock the sammy. If the francesca is roaring and the francesca slue the sammy then the francesca cark the sammy. If something slue the sammy then it chock the francesca. The sammy is sozzled.", "logic": "\nChock(francesca, sammy)\nSozzled(francesca)\nRoaring(francesca)\nDainty(francesca)\nSlue(francesca, sammy)\nCark(francesca, sammy)\nChock(sammy, francesca)\nAplitic(sammy)\nRoaring(sammy)\nDainty(sammy)\nSlue(sammy, francesca)\nCark(sammy, francesca)\nChock(sammy, francesca) -> Slue(francesca, sammy)\nforall x (Cark(x, francesca) and Aplitic(francesca) -> Slue(francesca, sammy))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) -> Slue(x, francesca))\nforall x (Chock(x, francesca) -> Cark(x, sammy))\nforall x (Cark(x, sammy) -> Aplitic(x))\nforall x (Slue(x, francesca) and Cark(francesca, sammy) -> Chock(x, sammy))\nRoaring(francesca) and Slue(francesca, sammy) -> Cark(francesca, sammy)\nforall x (Slue(x, sammy) -> Chock(x, francesca))\n\nSozzled(sammy)\n\nSozzled(sammy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1142"} {"premises": "Sheree is fuzzy. Luci is adaptable. Jeremias is lucid. Kylen is lucid. All lucid things are activated. If something is designed then it is lucid. White things are fuzzy. Nice, adaptable things are designed. Quiet things are adaptable. If Jeremias is designed then Jeremias is retractile. Jeremias is lucid.", "logic": "\nFuzzy(sheree)\nAdaptable(luci)\nLucid(jeremias)\nLucid(kylen)\nforall x (Lucid(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Designed(x) -> Lucid(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Fuzzy(x))\nforall x (Frozen(x) and Adaptable(x) -> Designed(x))\nforall x (Fuzzy(x) -> Adaptable(x))\nDesigned(jeremias) -> Retractile(jeremias)\n\nLucid(jeremias)\n\ntherefore Lucid(jeremias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Garnette is uncoupled. Gaven is four. Moina is admissive. Rozanna is admissive. All admissive things are unstated. If something is adiabatic then it is admissive. White things are uncoupled. Nice, four things are adiabatic. Quiet things are four. If Moina is adiabatic then Moina is aided. Rozanna is not admissive.", "logic": "\nUncoupled(garnette)\nFour(gaven)\nAdmissive(moina)\nAdmissive(rozanna)\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Unstated(x))\nforall x (Adiabatic(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Unstated(x) -> Uncoupled(x))\nforall x (Plus(x) and Four(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Uncoupled(x) -> Four(x))\nAdiabatic(moina) -> Aided(moina)\n\nnot Admissive(rozanna)\n\ntherefore Admissive(rozanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Ellene is acapnic. Sherill is noble. Ingmar is jungly. Othilie is jungly. All jungly things are gentile. If something is potential then it is jungly. White things are acapnic. Nice, noble things are potential. Quiet things are noble. If Ingmar is potential then Ingmar is sanitised. Ellene is noble.", "logic": "\nAcapnic(ellene)\nNoble(sherill)\nJungly(ingmar)\nJungly(othilie)\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Gentile(x))\nforall x (Potential(x) -> Jungly(x))\nforall x (Gentile(x) -> Acapnic(x))\nforall x (Leprose(x) and Noble(x) -> Potential(x))\nforall x (Acapnic(x) -> Noble(x))\nPotential(ingmar) -> Sanitised(ingmar)\n\nNoble(ellene)\n\nAcapnic(ellene) and forall x (Acapnic(x) -> Noble(x)) -> therefore Noble(ellene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Quigman is marketable. Laurens is strapping. Byron is canted. Regina is canted. All canted things are partizan. If something is mulish then it is canted. White things are marketable. Nice, strapping things are mulish. Quiet things are strapping. If Byron is mulish then Byron is honorific. Quigman is not strapping.", "logic": "\nMarketable(quigman)\nStrapping(laurens)\nCanted(byron)\nCanted(regina)\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Partizan(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) -> Canted(x))\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> Marketable(x))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) and Strapping(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Marketable(x) -> Strapping(x))\nMulish(byron) -> Honorific(byron)\n\nnot Strapping(quigman)\n\nMarketable(quigman) and forall x (Marketable(x) -> Strapping(x)) -> therefore Strapping(quigman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Daniel is beneficent. Malinda is doctorial. Vernice is dissolved. Standford is dissolved. All dissolved things are dorian. If something is faucal then it is dissolved. White things are beneficent. Nice, doctorial things are faucal. Quiet things are doctorial. If Vernice is faucal then Vernice is tutorial. Standford is beneficent.", "logic": "\nBeneficent(daniel)\nDoctorial(malinda)\nDissolved(vernice)\nDissolved(standford)\nforall x (Dissolved(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Faucal(x) -> Dissolved(x))\nforall x (Dorian(x) -> Beneficent(x))\nforall x (Mercurial(x) and Doctorial(x) -> Faucal(x))\nforall x (Beneficent(x) -> Doctorial(x))\nFaucal(vernice) -> Tutorial(vernice)\n\nBeneficent(standford)\n\nDissolved(standford) and forall x (Dissolved(x) -> Dorian(x)) -> therefore Dorian(standford) Dorian(standford) and forall x (Dorian(x) -> Beneficent(x)) -> therefore Beneficent(standford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Jenny is prospering. Roch is unwritten. Dita is spherical. Raphaela is spherical. All spherical things are adulterant. If something is historical then it is spherical. White things are prospering. Nice, unwritten things are historical. Quiet things are unwritten. If Dita is historical then Dita is snaky. Dita is not prospering.", "logic": "\nProspering(jenny)\nUnwritten(roch)\nSpherical(dita)\nSpherical(raphaela)\nforall x (Spherical(x) -> Adulterant(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) -> Spherical(x))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> Prospering(x))\nforall x (Argive(x) and Unwritten(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nHistorical(dita) -> Snaky(dita)\n\nnot Prospering(dita)\n\nSpherical(dita) and forall x (Spherical(x) -> Adulterant(x)) -> therefore Adulterant(dita) Adulterant(dita) and forall x (Adulterant(x) -> Prospering(x)) -> therefore Prospering(dita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Amalee is inactive. Nyssa is recurring. Cindy is earlyish. Amandy is earlyish. All earlyish things are vulcanised. If something is unshorn then it is earlyish. White things are inactive. Nice, recurring things are unshorn. Quiet things are recurring. If Cindy is unshorn then Cindy is leechlike. Cindy is recurring.", "logic": "\nInactive(amalee)\nRecurring(nyssa)\nEarlyish(cindy)\nEarlyish(amandy)\nforall x (Earlyish(x) -> Vulcanised(x))\nforall x (Unshorn(x) -> Earlyish(x))\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Inactive(x))\nforall x (Meticulous(x) and Recurring(x) -> Unshorn(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) -> Recurring(x))\nUnshorn(cindy) -> Leechlike(cindy)\n\nRecurring(cindy)\n\nEarlyish(cindy) and forall x (Earlyish(x) -> Vulcanised(x)) -> therefore Vulcanised(cindy) Vulcanised(cindy) and forall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Inactive(x)) -> therefore Inactive(cindy) Inactive(cindy) and forall x (Inactive(x) -> Recurring(x)) -> therefore Recurring(cindy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Lamb is oxonian. Helise is unnamed. Bee is summery. Darla is summery. All summery things are flyspeck. If something is extricable then it is summery. White things are oxonian. Nice, unnamed things are extricable. Quiet things are unnamed. If Bee is extricable then Bee is verrucose. Bee is not unnamed.", "logic": "\nOxonian(lamb)\nUnnamed(helise)\nSummery(bee)\nSummery(darla)\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Flyspeck(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) -> Summery(x))\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Oxonian(x))\nforall x (Hemic(x) and Unnamed(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) -> Unnamed(x))\nExtricable(bee) -> Verrucose(bee)\n\nnot Unnamed(bee)\n\nSummery(bee) and forall x (Summery(x) -> Flyspeck(x)) -> therefore Flyspeck(bee) Flyspeck(bee) and forall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Oxonian(x)) -> therefore Oxonian(bee) Oxonian(bee) and forall x (Oxonian(x) -> Unnamed(x)) -> therefore Unnamed(bee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Judd is pretorian. Lorri is shortened. Fawnia is afloat. Cathlene is afloat. All afloat things are light. If something is unimagined then it is afloat. White things are pretorian. Nice, shortened things are unimagined. Quiet things are shortened. If Fawnia is unimagined then Fawnia is touchable. Judd is not light.", "logic": "\nPretorian(judd)\nShortened(lorri)\nAfloat(fawnia)\nAfloat(cathlene)\nforall x (Afloat(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Unimagined(x) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) and Shortened(x) -> Unimagined(x))\nforall x (Pretorian(x) -> Shortened(x))\nUnimagined(fawnia) -> Touchable(fawnia)\n\nnot Light(judd)\n\nforall x (Afloat(x) -> Light(x)) <- forall x (Unimagined(x) -> Afloat(x)) <- forall x (Crinoid(x) and Shortened(x) -> Unimagined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Georgiana is splashed. Bridgett is plumb. Audra is adrift. Krista is adrift. All adrift things are vestmented. If something is lupine then it is adrift. White things are splashed. Nice, plumb things are lupine. Quiet things are plumb. If Audra is lupine then Audra is puny. Bridgett is splashed.", "logic": "\nSplashed(georgiana)\nPlumb(bridgett)\nAdrift(audra)\nAdrift(krista)\nforall x (Adrift(x) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Lupine(x) -> Adrift(x))\nforall x (Vestmented(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Tardy(x) and Plumb(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Splashed(x) -> Plumb(x))\nLupine(audra) -> Puny(audra)\n\nSplashed(bridgett)\n\nforall x (Vestmented(x) -> Splashed(x)) <- forall x (Adrift(x) -> Vestmented(x)) <- forall x (Lupine(x) -> Adrift(x)) <- forall x (Tardy(x) and Plumb(x) -> Lupine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Jaime is malarial. Adeline is agitative. Brynn is uveal. Merlina is uveal. All uveal things are ohmic. If something is lxxxvii then it is uveal. White things are malarial. Nice, agitative things are lxxxvii. Quiet things are agitative. If Brynn is lxxxvii then Brynn is plundered. Adeline is not uveal.", "logic": "\nMalarial(jaime)\nAgitative(adeline)\nUveal(brynn)\nUveal(merlina)\nforall x (Uveal(x) -> Ohmic(x))\nforall x (Lxxxvii(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Ohmic(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and Agitative(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) -> Agitative(x))\nLxxxvii(brynn) -> Plundered(brynn)\n\nnot Uveal(adeline)\n\nforall x (Lxxxvii(x) -> Uveal(x)) <- forall x (Adaptative(x) and Agitative(x) -> Lxxxvii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Barn is fractional. Carlena is canny. Lowell is ruddy. Katya is ruddy. All ruddy things are maximising. If something is thawed then it is ruddy. White things are fractional. Nice, canny things are thawed. Quiet things are canny. If Lowell is thawed then Lowell is protozoal. Barn is thawed.", "logic": "\nFractional(barn)\nCanny(carlena)\nRuddy(lowell)\nRuddy(katya)\nforall x (Ruddy(x) -> Maximising(x))\nforall x (Thawed(x) -> Ruddy(x))\nforall x (Maximising(x) -> Fractional(x))\nforall x (Protracted(x) and Canny(x) -> Thawed(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) -> Canny(x))\nThawed(lowell) -> Protozoal(lowell)\n\nThawed(barn)\n\nforall x (Protracted(x) and Canny(x) -> Thawed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Aldrich is minimalist. Nickolas is purgative. Corabel is miniature. Kora is miniature. All miniature things are canary. If something is seamanlike then it is miniature. White things are minimalist. Nice, purgative things are seamanlike. Quiet things are purgative. If Corabel is seamanlike then Corabel is renascent. Kora is not renascent.", "logic": "\nMinimalist(aldrich)\nPurgative(nickolas)\nMiniature(corabel)\nMiniature(kora)\nforall x (Miniature(x) -> Canary(x))\nforall x (Seamanlike(x) -> Miniature(x))\nforall x (Canary(x) -> Minimalist(x))\nforall x (Clotted(x) and Purgative(x) -> Seamanlike(x))\nforall x (Minimalist(x) -> Purgative(x))\nSeamanlike(corabel) -> Renascent(corabel)\n\nnot Renascent(kora)\n\nnot Renascent(kora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Hannie is flavorsome. Elisa is voluted. Torrance is paranasal. Lisa is paranasal. All paranasal things are triassic. If something is wraithlike then it is paranasal. White things are flavorsome. Nice, voluted things are wraithlike. Quiet things are voluted. If Torrance is wraithlike then Torrance is restive. Hannie is casual.", "logic": "\nFlavorsome(hannie)\nVoluted(elisa)\nParanasal(torrance)\nParanasal(lisa)\nforall x (Paranasal(x) -> Triassic(x))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Triassic(x) -> Flavorsome(x))\nforall x (Casual(x) and Voluted(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\nforall x (Flavorsome(x) -> Voluted(x))\nWraithlike(torrance) -> Restive(torrance)\n\nCasual(hannie)\n\nCasual(hannie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Sophie is shona. Hiro is giddy. Alisun is vasiform. Joane is vasiform. All vasiform things are petaled. If something is trihydroxy then it is vasiform. White things are shona. Nice, giddy things are trihydroxy. Quiet things are giddy. If Alisun is trihydroxy then Alisun is lxxvii. Sophie is not lxxvii.", "logic": "\nShona(sophie)\nGiddy(hiro)\nVasiform(alisun)\nVasiform(joane)\nforall x (Vasiform(x) -> Petaled(x))\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Petaled(x) -> Shona(x))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) and Giddy(x) -> Trihydroxy(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Giddy(x))\nTrihydroxy(alisun) -> Lxxvii(alisun)\n\nnot Lxxvii(sophie)\n\nnot Lxxvii(sophie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "Casi is delirious. Jorey is hugoesque. Ezekiel is brief. Rodolphe is brief. All brief things are biotypic. If something is structured then it is brief. White things are delirious. Nice, hugoesque things are structured. Quiet things are hugoesque. If Ezekiel is structured then Ezekiel is quondam. Jorey is quondam.", "logic": "\nDelirious(casi)\nHugoesque(jorey)\nBrief(ezekiel)\nBrief(rodolphe)\nforall x (Brief(x) -> Biotypic(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) -> Brief(x))\nforall x (Biotypic(x) -> Delirious(x))\nforall x (Early(x) and Hugoesque(x) -> Structured(x))\nforall x (Delirious(x) -> Hugoesque(x))\nStructured(ezekiel) -> Quondam(ezekiel)\n\nQuondam(jorey)\n\nQuondam(jorey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-633"} {"premises": "The muire precis the olenka. The olenka precis the fernando. The fernando readmit the melicent. The melicent ladder the olenka. If something ladder the olenka then the olenka is macerative. If something is macerative then it ladder the melicent. The olenka precis the fernando.", "logic": "\nPrecis(muire, olenka)\nPrecis(olenka, fernando)\nReadmit(fernando, melicent)\nLadder(melicent, olenka)\nforall x (Ladder(x, olenka) -> Macerative(olenka))\nforall x (Macerative(x) -> Ladder(x, melicent))\n\nPrecis(olenka, fernando)\n\ntherefore Precis(olenka, fernando)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "The prent dismiss the ursa. The ursa dismiss the patti. The patti bleed the megen. The megen corbel the ursa. If something corbel the ursa then the ursa is simplistic. If something is simplistic then it corbel the megen. The megen does not need the ursa.", "logic": "\nDismiss(prent, ursa)\nDismiss(ursa, patti)\nBleed(patti, megen)\nCorbel(megen, ursa)\nforall x (Corbel(x, ursa) -> Simplistic(ursa))\nforall x (Simplistic(x) -> Corbel(x, megen))\n\nnot Corbel(megen, ursa)\n\ntherefore Corbel(megen, ursa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "The andrea digitalize the legra. The legra digitalize the zane. The zane note the lindsay. The lindsay raid the legra. If something raid the legra then the legra is trimmed. If something is trimmed then it raid the lindsay. The legra is trimmed.", "logic": "\nDigitalize(andrea, legra)\nDigitalize(legra, zane)\nNote(zane, lindsay)\nRaid(lindsay, legra)\nforall x (Raid(x, legra) -> Trimmed(legra))\nforall x (Trimmed(x) -> Raid(x, lindsay))\n\nTrimmed(legra)\n\nRaid(lindsay, legra) and forall x (Raid(x, legra) -> Trimmed(legra)) -> therefore Trimmed(legra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "The remus furnish the archie. The archie furnish the mart. The mart candy the caresa. The caresa semaphore the archie. If something semaphore the archie then the archie is unnumbered. If something is unnumbered then it semaphore the caresa. The archie is not unnumbered.", "logic": "\nFurnish(remus, archie)\nFurnish(archie, mart)\nCandy(mart, caresa)\nSemaphore(caresa, archie)\nforall x (Semaphore(x, archie) -> Unnumbered(archie))\nforall x (Unnumbered(x) -> Semaphore(x, caresa))\n\nnot Unnumbered(archie)\n\nSemaphore(caresa, archie) and forall x (Semaphore(x, archie) -> Unnumbered(archie)) -> therefore Unnumbered(archie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "The jorge humanize the morten. The morten humanize the elwin. The elwin benficiate the sunshine. The sunshine blackball the morten. If something blackball the morten then the morten is enchanted. If something is enchanted then it blackball the sunshine. The sunshine does not need the sunshine.", "logic": "\nHumanize(jorge, morten)\nHumanize(morten, elwin)\nBenficiate(elwin, sunshine)\nBlackball(sunshine, morten)\nforall x (Blackball(x, morten) -> Enchanted(morten))\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Blackball(x, sunshine))\n\nnot Blackball(sunshine, sunshine)\n\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Blackball(x, sunshine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "The simonne trill the kirk. The kirk trill the nahum. The nahum dillydally the grayce. The grayce defraud the kirk. If something defraud the kirk then the kirk is watchful. If something is watchful then it defraud the grayce. The simonne defraud the grayce.", "logic": "\nTrill(simonne, kirk)\nTrill(kirk, nahum)\nDillydally(nahum, grayce)\nDefraud(grayce, kirk)\nforall x (Defraud(x, kirk) -> Watchful(kirk))\nforall x (Watchful(x) -> Defraud(x, grayce))\n\nDefraud(simonne, grayce)\n\nforall x (Watchful(x) -> Defraud(x, grayce)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "The chloris groom the griffith. The griffith groom the bennie. The bennie dawdle the bryce. The bryce flip the griffith. If something flip the griffith then the griffith is nonresiny. If something is nonresiny then it flip the bryce. The chloris does not visit the bennie.", "logic": "\nGroom(chloris, griffith)\nGroom(griffith, bennie)\nDawdle(bennie, bryce)\nFlip(bryce, griffith)\nforall x (Flip(x, griffith) -> Nonresiny(griffith))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) -> Flip(x, bryce))\n\nnot Groom(chloris, bennie)\n\nnot Groom(chloris, bennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "The nona reevaluate the pepito. The pepito reevaluate the dasha. The dasha abash the vera. The vera farm the pepito. If something farm the pepito then the pepito is piecemeal. If something is piecemeal then it farm the vera. The vera is cold.", "logic": "\nReevaluate(nona, pepito)\nReevaluate(pepito, dasha)\nAbash(dasha, vera)\nFarm(vera, pepito)\nforall x (Farm(x, pepito) -> Piecemeal(pepito))\nforall x (Piecemeal(x) -> Farm(x, vera))\n\nCold(vera)\n\nCold(vera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2878"} {"premises": "Dwight is not reformed. Dwight is fishy. Reese is reformed. Ole is defeasible. Ole is not rigid. Dael is not defeasible. Dael is reformed. If someone is epideictic and not reformed then they are scruffy. If someone is reformed then they are scruffy. If someone is defeasible and not reformed then they are not scruffy. If someone is scruffy and not defeasible then they are not fishy. If Dael is rigid then Dael is scruffy. If Dael is fishy and Dael is not defeasible then Dael is chelate. Dael is not defeasible.", "logic": "\nnot Reformed(dwight)\nFishy(dwight)\nReformed(reese)\nDefeasible(ole)\nnot Rigid(ole)\nnot Defeasible(dael)\nReformed(dael)\nforall x (Epideictic(x) and not Reformed(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Reformed(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and not Reformed(x) -> not Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Scruffy(x) and not Defeasible(x) -> not Fishy(x))\nRigid(dael) -> Scruffy(dael)\nFishy(dael) and not Defeasible(dael) -> Chelate(dael)\n\nnot Defeasible(dael)\n\ntherefore not Defeasible(dael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6761"} {"premises": "Lorianne is not suspended. Lorianne is nineteen. Carlyn is suspended. Burke is plundered. Burke is not crural. Ricardo is not plundered. Ricardo is suspended. If someone is salacious and not suspended then they are staring. If someone is suspended then they are staring. If someone is plundered and not suspended then they are not staring. If someone is staring and not plundered then they are not nineteen. If Ricardo is crural then Ricardo is staring. If Ricardo is nineteen and Ricardo is not plundered then Ricardo is alarming. Lorianne is not nineteen.", "logic": "\nnot Suspended(lorianne)\nNineteen(lorianne)\nSuspended(carlyn)\nPlundered(burke)\nnot Crural(burke)\nnot Plundered(ricardo)\nSuspended(ricardo)\nforall x (Salacious(x) and not Suspended(x) -> Staring(x))\nforall x (Suspended(x) -> Staring(x))\nforall x (Plundered(x) and not Suspended(x) -> not Staring(x))\nforall x (Staring(x) and not Plundered(x) -> not Nineteen(x))\nCrural(ricardo) -> Staring(ricardo)\nNineteen(ricardo) and not Plundered(ricardo) -> Alarming(ricardo)\n\nnot Nineteen(lorianne)\n\ntherefore Nineteen(lorianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6761"} {"premises": "Myrna is not evidenced. Myrna is onymous. Walker is evidenced. Jessa is epochal. Jessa is not bionomical. Alphonse is not epochal. Alphonse is evidenced. If someone is schismatic and not evidenced then they are homegrown. If someone is evidenced then they are homegrown. If someone is epochal and not evidenced then they are not homegrown. If someone is homegrown and not epochal then they are not onymous. If Alphonse is bionomical then Alphonse is homegrown. If Alphonse is onymous and Alphonse is not epochal then Alphonse is pyemic. Alphonse is not pyemic.", "logic": "\nnot Evidenced(myrna)\nOnymous(myrna)\nEvidenced(walker)\nEpochal(jessa)\nnot Bionomical(jessa)\nnot Epochal(alphonse)\nEvidenced(alphonse)\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and not Evidenced(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Epochal(x) and not Evidenced(x) -> not Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) and not Epochal(x) -> not Onymous(x))\nBionomical(alphonse) -> Homegrown(alphonse)\nOnymous(alphonse) and not Epochal(alphonse) -> Pyemic(alphonse)\n\nnot Pyemic(alphonse)\n\nOnymous(alphonse) and not Epochal(alphonse) -> Pyemic(alphonse) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6761"} {"premises": "Cleland is not triune. Cleland is foliolate. Standford is triune. Fayth is frivolous. Fayth is not clattery. Chane is not frivolous. Chane is triune. If someone is illusional and not triune then they are fabulous. If someone is triune then they are fabulous. If someone is frivolous and not triune then they are not fabulous. If someone is fabulous and not frivolous then they are not foliolate. If Chane is clattery then Chane is fabulous. If Chane is foliolate and Chane is not frivolous then Chane is socratic. Standford is socratic.", "logic": "\nnot Triune(cleland)\nFoliolate(cleland)\nTriune(standford)\nFrivolous(fayth)\nnot Clattery(fayth)\nnot Frivolous(chane)\nTriune(chane)\nforall x (Illusional(x) and not Triune(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Triune(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Frivolous(x) and not Triune(x) -> not Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and not Frivolous(x) -> not Foliolate(x))\nClattery(chane) -> Fabulous(chane)\nFoliolate(chane) and not Frivolous(chane) -> Socratic(chane)\n\nSocratic(standford)\n\nSocratic(standford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6761"} {"premises": "Corinna is coherent. Tamarah is jagged. Caro is bellicose. Oscar is coherent. All american, coherent people are hydroponic. Young people are maudlin. If someone is bellicose and maudlin then they are sheetlike. If Caro is sheetlike then Caro is bellicose. All american people are hydroponic. All jagged people are bellicose. Caro is bellicose.", "logic": "\nCoherent(corinna)\nJagged(tamarah)\nBellicose(caro)\nCoherent(oscar)\nforall x (American(x) and Coherent(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) and Maudlin(x) -> Sheetlike(x))\nSheetlike(caro) -> Bellicose(caro)\nforall x (American(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Jagged(x) -> Bellicose(x))\n\nBellicose(caro)\n\ntherefore Bellicose(caro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Daphna is smokeless. Devonna is slicked. Perceval is sunrise. Renault is smokeless. All monkish, smokeless people are neurogenic. Young people are unassisted. If someone is sunrise and unassisted then they are digitate. If Perceval is digitate then Perceval is sunrise. All monkish people are neurogenic. All slicked people are sunrise. Daphna is not smokeless.", "logic": "\nSmokeless(daphna)\nSlicked(devonna)\nSunrise(perceval)\nSmokeless(renault)\nforall x (Monkish(x) and Smokeless(x) -> Neurogenic(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) -> Unassisted(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Unassisted(x) -> Digitate(x))\nDigitate(perceval) -> Sunrise(perceval)\nforall x (Monkish(x) -> Neurogenic(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) -> Sunrise(x))\n\nnot Smokeless(daphna)\n\ntherefore Smokeless(daphna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Aldo is vexatious. Daria is subacid. Waylon is septuple. Maible is vexatious. All overeager, vexatious people are squiggly. Young people are impudent. If someone is septuple and impudent then they are vicious. If Waylon is vicious then Waylon is septuple. All overeager people are squiggly. All subacid people are septuple. Daria is septuple.", "logic": "\nVexatious(aldo)\nSubacid(daria)\nSeptuple(waylon)\nVexatious(maible)\nforall x (Overeager(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Squiggly(x))\nforall x (Septuple(x) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Septuple(x) and Impudent(x) -> Vicious(x))\nVicious(waylon) -> Septuple(waylon)\nforall x (Overeager(x) -> Squiggly(x))\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> Septuple(x))\n\nSeptuple(daria)\n\nSubacid(daria) and forall x (Subacid(x) -> Septuple(x)) -> therefore Septuple(daria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Tandy is ruffled. Pammie is moneran. Janna is structural. Ceciley is ruffled. All wolfish, ruffled people are humbled. Young people are maoist. If someone is structural and maoist then they are frugal. If Janna is frugal then Janna is structural. All wolfish people are humbled. All moneran people are structural. Janna is not maoist.", "logic": "\nRuffled(tandy)\nMoneran(pammie)\nStructural(janna)\nRuffled(ceciley)\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and Ruffled(x) -> Humbled(x))\nforall x (Structural(x) -> Maoist(x))\nforall x (Structural(x) and Maoist(x) -> Frugal(x))\nFrugal(janna) -> Structural(janna)\nforall x (Wolfish(x) -> Humbled(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) -> Structural(x))\n\nnot Maoist(janna)\n\nStructural(janna) and forall x (Structural(x) -> Maoist(x)) -> therefore Maoist(janna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Bartie is dispirited. Cornelia is maidenly. Gershom is wrathful. Arther is dispirited. All pitiful, dispirited people are overblown. Young people are saclike. If someone is wrathful and saclike then they are wedded. If Gershom is wedded then Gershom is wrathful. All pitiful people are overblown. All maidenly people are wrathful. Cornelia is saclike.", "logic": "\nDispirited(bartie)\nMaidenly(cornelia)\nWrathful(gershom)\nDispirited(arther)\nforall x (Pitiful(x) and Dispirited(x) -> Overblown(x))\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> Saclike(x))\nforall x (Wrathful(x) and Saclike(x) -> Wedded(x))\nWedded(gershom) -> Wrathful(gershom)\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> Overblown(x))\nforall x (Maidenly(x) -> Wrathful(x))\n\nSaclike(cornelia)\n\nMaidenly(cornelia) and forall x (Maidenly(x) -> Wrathful(x)) -> therefore Wrathful(cornelia) Wrathful(cornelia) and forall x (Wrathful(x) -> Saclike(x)) -> therefore Saclike(cornelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Marion is brachiate. Winthrop is isolable. Syd is connatural. Ashish is brachiate. All boiled, brachiate people are aetiologic. Young people are untimbered. If someone is connatural and untimbered then they are tangerine. If Syd is tangerine then Syd is connatural. All boiled people are aetiologic. All isolable people are connatural. Syd is not tangerine.", "logic": "\nBrachiate(marion)\nIsolable(winthrop)\nConnatural(syd)\nBrachiate(ashish)\nforall x (Boiled(x) and Brachiate(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Connatural(x) -> Untimbered(x))\nforall x (Connatural(x) and Untimbered(x) -> Tangerine(x))\nTangerine(syd) -> Connatural(syd)\nforall x (Boiled(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Isolable(x) -> Connatural(x))\n\nnot Tangerine(syd)\n\nConnatural(syd) and forall x (Connatural(x) -> Untimbered(x)) -> therefore Untimbered(syd) Connatural(syd) and Untimbered(syd) and forall x (Connatural(x) and Untimbered(x) -> Tangerine(x)) -> therefore Tangerine(syd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Enrika is muhammadan. Coralie is unrelated. Fiorenze is abaxial. Noelani is muhammadan. All mechanised, muhammadan people are creditable. Young people are vapourised. If someone is abaxial and vapourised then they are iodised. If Fiorenze is iodised then Fiorenze is abaxial. All mechanised people are creditable. All unrelated people are abaxial. Coralie is iodised.", "logic": "\nMuhammadan(enrika)\nUnrelated(coralie)\nAbaxial(fiorenze)\nMuhammadan(noelani)\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and Muhammadan(x) -> Creditable(x))\nforall x (Abaxial(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Abaxial(x) and Vapourised(x) -> Iodised(x))\nIodised(fiorenze) -> Abaxial(fiorenze)\nforall x (Mechanised(x) -> Creditable(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) -> Abaxial(x))\n\nIodised(coralie)\n\nUnrelated(coralie) and forall x (Unrelated(x) -> Abaxial(x)) -> therefore Abaxial(coralie) Unrelated(coralie) and forall x (Unrelated(x) -> Abaxial(x)) -> therefore Abaxial(coralie) Abaxial(coralie) and forall x (Abaxial(x) -> Vapourised(x)) -> therefore Vapourised(coralie) Abaxial(coralie) and Vapourised(coralie) and forall x (Abaxial(x) and Vapourised(x) -> Iodised(x)) -> therefore Iodised(coralie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Veronike is diverted. Angie is discontent. Darrell is foursquare. Hertha is diverted. All scaphoid, diverted people are scriptural. Young people are conversant. If someone is foursquare and conversant then they are concentric. If Darrell is concentric then Darrell is foursquare. All scaphoid people are scriptural. All discontent people are foursquare. Angie is not concentric.", "logic": "\nDiverted(veronike)\nDiscontent(angie)\nFoursquare(darrell)\nDiverted(hertha)\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) and Diverted(x) -> Scriptural(x))\nforall x (Foursquare(x) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Foursquare(x) and Conversant(x) -> Concentric(x))\nConcentric(darrell) -> Foursquare(darrell)\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Scriptural(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Foursquare(x))\n\nnot Concentric(angie)\n\nDiscontent(angie) and forall x (Discontent(x) -> Foursquare(x)) -> therefore Foursquare(angie) Discontent(angie) and forall x (Discontent(x) -> Foursquare(x)) -> therefore Foursquare(angie) Foursquare(angie) and forall x (Foursquare(x) -> Conversant(x)) -> therefore Conversant(angie) Foursquare(angie) and Conversant(angie) and forall x (Foursquare(x) and Conversant(x) -> Concentric(x)) -> therefore Concentric(angie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "June is unhinged. Rab is turkish. Zarah is synovial. Zsazsa is unhinged. All fecund, unhinged people are slumberous. Young people are lucifugous. If someone is synovial and lucifugous then they are valueless. If Zarah is valueless then Zarah is synovial. All fecund people are slumberous. All turkish people are synovial. June is not lucifugous.", "logic": "\nUnhinged(june)\nTurkish(rab)\nSynovial(zarah)\nUnhinged(zsazsa)\nforall x (Fecund(x) and Unhinged(x) -> Slumberous(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) -> Lucifugous(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) and Lucifugous(x) -> Valueless(x))\nValueless(zarah) -> Synovial(zarah)\nforall x (Fecund(x) -> Slumberous(x))\nforall x (Turkish(x) -> Synovial(x))\n\nnot Lucifugous(june)\n\nforall x (Synovial(x) -> Lucifugous(x)) <- forall x (Turkish(x) -> Synovial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Jeffry is faithful. Elliot is charged. Nicolette is barytic. Darline is faithful. All finer, faithful people are unlipped. Young people are filariid. If someone is barytic and filariid then they are slapstick. If Nicolette is slapstick then Nicolette is barytic. All finer people are unlipped. All charged people are barytic. Nicolette is unlipped.", "logic": "\nFaithful(jeffry)\nCharged(elliot)\nBarytic(nicolette)\nFaithful(darline)\nforall x (Finer(x) and Faithful(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Barytic(x) -> Filariid(x))\nforall x (Barytic(x) and Filariid(x) -> Slapstick(x))\nSlapstick(nicolette) -> Barytic(nicolette)\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Barytic(x))\n\nUnlipped(nicolette)\n\nforall x (Finer(x) and Faithful(x) -> Unlipped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Violetta is praising. Sig is vietnamese. Angelica is sevenfold. Wenonah is praising. All bored, praising people are initiatory. Young people are cellulosid. If someone is sevenfold and cellulosid then they are bouldery. If Angelica is bouldery then Angelica is sevenfold. All bored people are initiatory. All vietnamese people are sevenfold. Violetta is not initiatory.", "logic": "\nPraising(violetta)\nVietnamese(sig)\nSevenfold(angelica)\nPraising(wenonah)\nforall x (Bored(x) and Praising(x) -> Initiatory(x))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) -> Cellulosid(x))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) and Cellulosid(x) -> Bouldery(x))\nBouldery(angelica) -> Sevenfold(angelica)\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Initiatory(x))\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) -> Sevenfold(x))\n\nnot Initiatory(violetta)\n\nforall x (Bored(x) and Praising(x) -> Initiatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Melisande is astir. Farrand is bicuspid. Conan is ivied. Annabel is astir. All groping, astir people are cuddlesome. Young people are skanky. If someone is ivied and skanky then they are cortical. If Conan is cortical then Conan is ivied. All groping people are cuddlesome. All bicuspid people are ivied. Farrand is cuddlesome.", "logic": "\nAstir(melisande)\nBicuspid(farrand)\nIvied(conan)\nAstir(annabel)\nforall x (Groping(x) and Astir(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nforall x (Ivied(x) -> Skanky(x))\nforall x (Ivied(x) and Skanky(x) -> Cortical(x))\nCortical(conan) -> Ivied(conan)\nforall x (Groping(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nforall x (Bicuspid(x) -> Ivied(x))\n\nCuddlesome(farrand)\n\nforall x (Groping(x) and Astir(x) -> Cuddlesome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Leonid is anglican. Madelena is sintered. Lindsay is funerary. Sidonia is anglican. All isolating, anglican people are salving. Young people are ageing. If someone is funerary and ageing then they are transitory. If Lindsay is transitory then Lindsay is funerary. All isolating people are salving. All sintered people are funerary. Lindsay is not anglican.", "logic": "\nAnglican(leonid)\nSintered(madelena)\nFunerary(lindsay)\nAnglican(sidonia)\nforall x (Isolating(x) and Anglican(x) -> Salving(x))\nforall x (Funerary(x) -> Ageing(x))\nforall x (Funerary(x) and Ageing(x) -> Transitory(x))\nTransitory(lindsay) -> Funerary(lindsay)\nforall x (Isolating(x) -> Salving(x))\nforall x (Sintered(x) -> Funerary(x))\n\nnot Anglican(lindsay)\n\nnot Anglican(lindsay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Dela is scoreless. Georgetta is sniffy. Carola is enzootic. Garold is scoreless. All pulverized, scoreless people are botchy. Young people are laudatory. If someone is enzootic and laudatory then they are unmated. If Carola is unmated then Carola is enzootic. All pulverized people are botchy. All sniffy people are enzootic. Georgetta is pulverized.", "logic": "\nScoreless(dela)\nSniffy(georgetta)\nEnzootic(carola)\nScoreless(garold)\nforall x (Pulverized(x) and Scoreless(x) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Enzootic(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Enzootic(x) and Laudatory(x) -> Unmated(x))\nUnmated(carola) -> Enzootic(carola)\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Enzootic(x))\n\nPulverized(georgetta)\n\nPulverized(georgetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Elyse is retinal. Shel is resounding. Efram is religious. Aggie is retinal. All dermic, retinal people are maximum. Young people are sinuous. If someone is religious and sinuous then they are fordable. If Efram is fordable then Efram is religious. All dermic people are maximum. All resounding people are religious. Elyse is not dermic.", "logic": "\nRetinal(elyse)\nResounding(shel)\nReligious(efram)\nRetinal(aggie)\nforall x (Dermic(x) and Retinal(x) -> Maximum(x))\nforall x (Religious(x) -> Sinuous(x))\nforall x (Religious(x) and Sinuous(x) -> Fordable(x))\nFordable(efram) -> Religious(efram)\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> Maximum(x))\nforall x (Resounding(x) -> Religious(x))\n\nnot Dermic(elyse)\n\nnot Dermic(elyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "Dylan is backmost. Fernande is wedded. Marcela is straggling. Conan is backmost. All glaciated, backmost people are eccentric. Young people are geodetic. If someone is straggling and geodetic then they are chiasmic. If Marcela is chiasmic then Marcela is straggling. All glaciated people are eccentric. All wedded people are straggling. Marcela is glaciated.", "logic": "\nBackmost(dylan)\nWedded(fernande)\nStraggling(marcela)\nBackmost(conan)\nforall x (Glaciated(x) and Backmost(x) -> Eccentric(x))\nforall x (Straggling(x) -> Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Straggling(x) and Geodetic(x) -> Chiasmic(x))\nChiasmic(marcela) -> Straggling(marcela)\nforall x (Glaciated(x) -> Eccentric(x))\nforall x (Wedded(x) -> Straggling(x))\n\nGlaciated(marcela)\n\nGlaciated(marcela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1732"} {"premises": "The ishmael deflate the arel. The ishmael deflate the nancey. The ishmael combat the nancey. The arel is precise. The nancey is damn. The nancey is precise. The nancey roam the ishmael. If someone is waterborne then they need the arel. If someone roam the nancey then they need the ishmael. If someone deflate the nancey then the nancey deflate the ishmael. If someone is damn and they chase the ishmael then the ishmael roam the nancey. If someone is epic and they see the ishmael then the ishmael roam the nancey. If the ishmael is not epic then the ishmael combat the arel. The nancey is precise.", "logic": "\nDeflate(ishmael, arel)\nDeflate(ishmael, nancey)\nCombat(ishmael, nancey)\nPrecise(arel)\nDamn(nancey)\nPrecise(nancey)\nRoam(nancey, ishmael)\nforall x (Waterborne(x) -> Roam(x, arel))\nforall x (Roam(x, nancey) -> Roam(x, ishmael))\nforall x (Deflate(x, nancey) -> Deflate(nancey, ishmael))\nforall x (Damn(x) and Deflate(x, ishmael) -> Roam(ishmael, nancey))\nforall x (Epic(x) and Combat(x, ishmael) -> Roam(ishmael, nancey))\nnot Epic(ishmael) -> Combat(ishmael, arel)\n\nPrecise(nancey)\n\ntherefore Precise(nancey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The norma route the querida. The norma route the brynn. The norma apprize the brynn. The querida is seriocomic. The brynn is discalced. The brynn is seriocomic. The brynn bombilate the norma. If someone is marine then they need the querida. If someone bombilate the brynn then they need the norma. If someone route the brynn then the brynn route the norma. If someone is discalced and they chase the norma then the norma bombilate the brynn. If someone is surface and they see the norma then the norma bombilate the brynn. If the norma is not surface then the norma apprize the querida. The norma does not see the brynn.", "logic": "\nRoute(norma, querida)\nRoute(norma, brynn)\nApprize(norma, brynn)\nSeriocomic(querida)\nDiscalced(brynn)\nSeriocomic(brynn)\nBombilate(brynn, norma)\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Bombilate(x, querida))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, brynn) -> Bombilate(x, norma))\nforall x (Route(x, brynn) -> Route(brynn, norma))\nforall x (Discalced(x) and Route(x, norma) -> Bombilate(norma, brynn))\nforall x (Surface(x) and Apprize(x, norma) -> Bombilate(norma, brynn))\nnot Surface(norma) -> Apprize(norma, querida)\n\nnot Apprize(norma, brynn)\n\ntherefore Apprize(norma, brynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The son stipulate the cornelle. The son stipulate the jerry. The son amuse the jerry. The cornelle is steepish. The jerry is isoclinal. The jerry is steepish. The jerry remedy the son. If someone is shambolic then they need the cornelle. If someone remedy the jerry then they need the son. If someone stipulate the jerry then the jerry stipulate the son. If someone is isoclinal and they chase the son then the son remedy the jerry. If someone is pyrogallic and they see the son then the son remedy the jerry. If the son is not pyrogallic then the son amuse the cornelle. The jerry stipulate the son.", "logic": "\nStipulate(son, cornelle)\nStipulate(son, jerry)\nAmuse(son, jerry)\nSteepish(cornelle)\nIsoclinal(jerry)\nSteepish(jerry)\nRemedy(jerry, son)\nforall x (Shambolic(x) -> Remedy(x, cornelle))\nforall x (Remedy(x, jerry) -> Remedy(x, son))\nforall x (Stipulate(x, jerry) -> Stipulate(jerry, son))\nforall x (Isoclinal(x) and Stipulate(x, son) -> Remedy(son, jerry))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) and Amuse(x, son) -> Remedy(son, jerry))\nnot Pyrogallic(son) -> Amuse(son, cornelle)\n\nStipulate(jerry, son)\n\nStipulate(son, jerry) and forall x (Stipulate(x, jerry) -> Stipulate(jerry, son)) -> therefore Stipulate(jerry, son)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The anthe clarify the tom. The anthe clarify the gerome. The anthe ensure the gerome. The tom is jainist. The gerome is minty. The gerome is jainist. The gerome overawe the anthe. If someone is barometric then they need the tom. If someone overawe the gerome then they need the anthe. If someone clarify the gerome then the gerome clarify the anthe. If someone is minty and they chase the anthe then the anthe overawe the gerome. If someone is murderous and they see the anthe then the anthe overawe the gerome. If the anthe is not murderous then the anthe ensure the tom. The gerome does not chase the anthe.", "logic": "\nClarify(anthe, tom)\nClarify(anthe, gerome)\nEnsure(anthe, gerome)\nJainist(tom)\nMinty(gerome)\nJainist(gerome)\nOverawe(gerome, anthe)\nforall x (Barometric(x) -> Overawe(x, tom))\nforall x (Overawe(x, gerome) -> Overawe(x, anthe))\nforall x (Clarify(x, gerome) -> Clarify(gerome, anthe))\nforall x (Minty(x) and Clarify(x, anthe) -> Overawe(anthe, gerome))\nforall x (Murderous(x) and Ensure(x, anthe) -> Overawe(anthe, gerome))\nnot Murderous(anthe) -> Ensure(anthe, tom)\n\nnot Clarify(gerome, anthe)\n\nClarify(anthe, gerome) and forall x (Clarify(x, gerome) -> Clarify(gerome, anthe)) -> therefore Clarify(gerome, anthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The juanita amplify the helene. The juanita amplify the may. The juanita comprise the may. The helene is extempore. The may is seventh. The may is extempore. The may mercerise the juanita. If someone is asthmatic then they need the helene. If someone mercerise the may then they need the juanita. If someone amplify the may then the may amplify the juanita. If someone is seventh and they chase the juanita then the juanita mercerise the may. If someone is moneyless and they see the juanita then the juanita mercerise the may. If the juanita is not moneyless then the juanita comprise the helene. The juanita mercerise the may.", "logic": "\nAmplify(juanita, helene)\nAmplify(juanita, may)\nComprise(juanita, may)\nExtempore(helene)\nSeventh(may)\nExtempore(may)\nMercerise(may, juanita)\nforall x (Asthmatic(x) -> Mercerise(x, helene))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, may) -> Mercerise(x, juanita))\nforall x (Amplify(x, may) -> Amplify(may, juanita))\nforall x (Seventh(x) and Amplify(x, juanita) -> Mercerise(juanita, may))\nforall x (Moneyless(x) and Comprise(x, juanita) -> Mercerise(juanita, may))\nnot Moneyless(juanita) -> Comprise(juanita, helene)\n\nMercerise(juanita, may)\n\nAmplify(juanita, may) and forall x (Amplify(x, may) -> Amplify(may, juanita)) -> therefore Amplify(may, juanita) Seventh(may) and Amplify(may, juanita) and forall x (Seventh(x) and Amplify(x, juanita) -> Mercerise(juanita, may)) -> therefore Mercerise(juanita, may)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The olivia enkindle the danny. The olivia enkindle the noellyn. The olivia ingest the noellyn. The danny is shakeable. The noellyn is austrian. The noellyn is shakeable. The noellyn botch the olivia. If someone is endermic then they need the danny. If someone botch the noellyn then they need the olivia. If someone enkindle the noellyn then the noellyn enkindle the olivia. If someone is austrian and they chase the olivia then the olivia botch the noellyn. If someone is wedged and they see the olivia then the olivia botch the noellyn. If the olivia is not wedged then the olivia ingest the danny. The olivia does not need the noellyn.", "logic": "\nEnkindle(olivia, danny)\nEnkindle(olivia, noellyn)\nIngest(olivia, noellyn)\nShakeable(danny)\nAustrian(noellyn)\nShakeable(noellyn)\nBotch(noellyn, olivia)\nforall x (Endermic(x) -> Botch(x, danny))\nforall x (Botch(x, noellyn) -> Botch(x, olivia))\nforall x (Enkindle(x, noellyn) -> Enkindle(noellyn, olivia))\nforall x (Austrian(x) and Enkindle(x, olivia) -> Botch(olivia, noellyn))\nforall x (Wedged(x) and Ingest(x, olivia) -> Botch(olivia, noellyn))\nnot Wedged(olivia) -> Ingest(olivia, danny)\n\nnot Botch(olivia, noellyn)\n\nEnkindle(olivia, noellyn) and forall x (Enkindle(x, noellyn) -> Enkindle(noellyn, olivia)) -> therefore Enkindle(noellyn, olivia) Austrian(noellyn) and Enkindle(noellyn, olivia) and forall x (Austrian(x) and Enkindle(x, olivia) -> Botch(olivia, noellyn)) -> therefore Botch(olivia, noellyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The sheppard eulogise the coral. The sheppard eulogise the abbie. The sheppard grieve the abbie. The coral is baptistic. The abbie is sure. The abbie is baptistic. The abbie cocoon the sheppard. If someone is cogitative then they need the coral. If someone cocoon the abbie then they need the sheppard. If someone eulogise the abbie then the abbie eulogise the sheppard. If someone is sure and they chase the sheppard then the sheppard cocoon the abbie. If someone is famished and they see the sheppard then the sheppard cocoon the abbie. If the sheppard is not famished then the sheppard grieve the coral. The sheppard cocoon the sheppard.", "logic": "\nEulogise(sheppard, coral)\nEulogise(sheppard, abbie)\nGrieve(sheppard, abbie)\nBaptistic(coral)\nSure(abbie)\nBaptistic(abbie)\nCocoon(abbie, sheppard)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) -> Cocoon(x, coral))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, abbie) -> Cocoon(x, sheppard))\nforall x (Eulogise(x, abbie) -> Eulogise(abbie, sheppard))\nforall x (Sure(x) and Eulogise(x, sheppard) -> Cocoon(sheppard, abbie))\nforall x (Famished(x) and Grieve(x, sheppard) -> Cocoon(sheppard, abbie))\nnot Famished(sheppard) -> Grieve(sheppard, coral)\n\nCocoon(sheppard, sheppard)\n\nEulogise(sheppard, abbie) and forall x (Eulogise(x, abbie) -> Eulogise(abbie, sheppard)) -> therefore Eulogise(abbie, sheppard) Sure(abbie) and Eulogise(abbie, sheppard) and forall x (Sure(x) and Eulogise(x, sheppard) -> Cocoon(sheppard, abbie)) -> therefore Cocoon(sheppard, abbie) Cocoon(sheppard, abbie) and forall x (Cocoon(x, abbie) -> Cocoon(x, sheppard)) -> therefore Cocoon(sheppard, sheppard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The ruperto coact the apollo. The ruperto coact the leesa. The ruperto parley the leesa. The apollo is clanking. The leesa is scaly. The leesa is clanking. The leesa premiss the ruperto. If someone is unstirred then they need the apollo. If someone premiss the leesa then they need the ruperto. If someone coact the leesa then the leesa coact the ruperto. If someone is scaly and they chase the ruperto then the ruperto premiss the leesa. If someone is alacritous and they see the ruperto then the ruperto premiss the leesa. If the ruperto is not alacritous then the ruperto parley the apollo. The ruperto does not need the ruperto.", "logic": "\nCoact(ruperto, apollo)\nCoact(ruperto, leesa)\nParley(ruperto, leesa)\nClanking(apollo)\nScaly(leesa)\nClanking(leesa)\nPremiss(leesa, ruperto)\nforall x (Unstirred(x) -> Premiss(x, apollo))\nforall x (Premiss(x, leesa) -> Premiss(x, ruperto))\nforall x (Coact(x, leesa) -> Coact(leesa, ruperto))\nforall x (Scaly(x) and Coact(x, ruperto) -> Premiss(ruperto, leesa))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) and Parley(x, ruperto) -> Premiss(ruperto, leesa))\nnot Alacritous(ruperto) -> Parley(ruperto, apollo)\n\nnot Premiss(ruperto, ruperto)\n\nCoact(ruperto, leesa) and forall x (Coact(x, leesa) -> Coact(leesa, ruperto)) -> therefore Coact(leesa, ruperto) Scaly(leesa) and Coact(leesa, ruperto) and forall x (Scaly(x) and Coact(x, ruperto) -> Premiss(ruperto, leesa)) -> therefore Premiss(ruperto, leesa) Premiss(ruperto, leesa) and forall x (Premiss(x, leesa) -> Premiss(x, ruperto)) -> therefore Premiss(ruperto, ruperto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The aloise deride the salomone. The aloise deride the adolphe. The aloise coerce the adolphe. The salomone is zapotec. The adolphe is tenebrous. The adolphe is zapotec. The adolphe subside the aloise. If someone is asiatic then they need the salomone. If someone subside the adolphe then they need the aloise. If someone deride the adolphe then the adolphe deride the aloise. If someone is tenebrous and they chase the aloise then the aloise subside the adolphe. If someone is wartlike and they see the aloise then the aloise subside the adolphe. If the aloise is not wartlike then the aloise coerce the salomone. The salomone does not need the salomone.", "logic": "\nDeride(aloise, salomone)\nDeride(aloise, adolphe)\nCoerce(aloise, adolphe)\nZapotec(salomone)\nTenebrous(adolphe)\nZapotec(adolphe)\nSubside(adolphe, aloise)\nforall x (Asiatic(x) -> Subside(x, salomone))\nforall x (Subside(x, adolphe) -> Subside(x, aloise))\nforall x (Deride(x, adolphe) -> Deride(adolphe, aloise))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) and Deride(x, aloise) -> Subside(aloise, adolphe))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) and Coerce(x, aloise) -> Subside(aloise, adolphe))\nnot Wartlike(aloise) -> Coerce(aloise, salomone)\n\nnot Subside(salomone, salomone)\n\nforall x (Asiatic(x) -> Subside(x, salomone)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The denice abolish the eveline. The denice abolish the rasla. The denice attemper the rasla. The eveline is striking. The rasla is pocketable. The rasla is striking. The rasla bewitch the denice. If someone is credited then they need the eveline. If someone bewitch the rasla then they need the denice. If someone abolish the rasla then the rasla abolish the denice. If someone is pocketable and they chase the denice then the denice bewitch the rasla. If someone is uncooked and they see the denice then the denice bewitch the rasla. If the denice is not uncooked then the denice attemper the eveline. The rasla bewitch the eveline.", "logic": "\nAbolish(denice, eveline)\nAbolish(denice, rasla)\nAttemper(denice, rasla)\nStriking(eveline)\nPocketable(rasla)\nStriking(rasla)\nBewitch(rasla, denice)\nforall x (Credited(x) -> Bewitch(x, eveline))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, rasla) -> Bewitch(x, denice))\nforall x (Abolish(x, rasla) -> Abolish(rasla, denice))\nforall x (Pocketable(x) and Abolish(x, denice) -> Bewitch(denice, rasla))\nforall x (Uncooked(x) and Attemper(x, denice) -> Bewitch(denice, rasla))\nnot Uncooked(denice) -> Attemper(denice, eveline)\n\nBewitch(rasla, eveline)\n\nforall x (Credited(x) -> Bewitch(x, eveline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The caria centralise the alysa. The caria centralise the peyton. The caria coldwork the peyton. The alysa is enforced. The peyton is atrophied. The peyton is enforced. The peyton obey the caria. If someone is mendelian then they need the alysa. If someone obey the peyton then they need the caria. If someone centralise the peyton then the peyton centralise the caria. If someone is atrophied and they chase the caria then the caria obey the peyton. If someone is homicidal and they see the caria then the caria obey the peyton. If the caria is not homicidal then the caria coldwork the alysa. The caria does not need the alysa.", "logic": "\nCentralise(caria, alysa)\nCentralise(caria, peyton)\nColdwork(caria, peyton)\nEnforced(alysa)\nAtrophied(peyton)\nEnforced(peyton)\nObey(peyton, caria)\nforall x (Mendelian(x) -> Obey(x, alysa))\nforall x (Obey(x, peyton) -> Obey(x, caria))\nforall x (Centralise(x, peyton) -> Centralise(peyton, caria))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and Centralise(x, caria) -> Obey(caria, peyton))\nforall x (Homicidal(x) and Coldwork(x, caria) -> Obey(caria, peyton))\nnot Homicidal(caria) -> Coldwork(caria, alysa)\n\nnot Obey(caria, alysa)\n\nforall x (Mendelian(x) -> Obey(x, alysa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The merrili accouter the bobine. The merrili accouter the weidar. The merrili dwell the weidar. The bobine is dietetical. The weidar is classic. The weidar is dietetical. The weidar whisper the merrili. If someone is chopped then they need the bobine. If someone whisper the weidar then they need the merrili. If someone accouter the weidar then the weidar accouter the merrili. If someone is classic and they chase the merrili then the merrili whisper the weidar. If someone is netted and they see the merrili then the merrili whisper the weidar. If the merrili is not netted then the merrili dwell the bobine. The bobine whisper the merrili.", "logic": "\nAccouter(merrili, bobine)\nAccouter(merrili, weidar)\nDwell(merrili, weidar)\nDietetical(bobine)\nClassic(weidar)\nDietetical(weidar)\nWhisper(weidar, merrili)\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Whisper(x, bobine))\nforall x (Whisper(x, weidar) -> Whisper(x, merrili))\nforall x (Accouter(x, weidar) -> Accouter(weidar, merrili))\nforall x (Classic(x) and Accouter(x, merrili) -> Whisper(merrili, weidar))\nforall x (Netted(x) and Dwell(x, merrili) -> Whisper(merrili, weidar))\nnot Netted(merrili) -> Dwell(merrili, bobine)\n\nWhisper(bobine, merrili)\n\nforall x (Whisper(x, weidar) -> Whisper(x, merrili)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The marya endear the colly. The marya endear the cherish. The marya glue the cherish. The colly is verboten. The cherish is hollow. The cherish is verboten. The cherish enrapture the marya. If someone is botched then they need the colly. If someone enrapture the cherish then they need the marya. If someone endear the cherish then the cherish endear the marya. If someone is hollow and they chase the marya then the marya enrapture the cherish. If someone is filmable and they see the marya then the marya enrapture the cherish. If the marya is not filmable then the marya glue the colly. The cherish does not see the colly.", "logic": "\nEndear(marya, colly)\nEndear(marya, cherish)\nGlue(marya, cherish)\nVerboten(colly)\nHollow(cherish)\nVerboten(cherish)\nEnrapture(cherish, marya)\nforall x (Botched(x) -> Enrapture(x, colly))\nforall x (Enrapture(x, cherish) -> Enrapture(x, marya))\nforall x (Endear(x, cherish) -> Endear(cherish, marya))\nforall x (Hollow(x) and Endear(x, marya) -> Enrapture(marya, cherish))\nforall x (Filmable(x) and Glue(x, marya) -> Enrapture(marya, cherish))\nnot Filmable(marya) -> Glue(marya, colly)\n\nnot Glue(cherish, colly)\n\nnot Glue(cherish, colly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The clinten battle the mathias. The clinten battle the sella. The clinten slander the sella. The mathias is realized. The sella is brushy. The sella is realized. The sella gore the clinten. If someone is firm then they need the mathias. If someone gore the sella then they need the clinten. If someone battle the sella then the sella battle the clinten. If someone is brushy and they chase the clinten then the clinten gore the sella. If someone is perennial and they see the clinten then the clinten gore the sella. If the clinten is not perennial then the clinten slander the mathias. The clinten battle the clinten.", "logic": "\nBattle(clinten, mathias)\nBattle(clinten, sella)\nSlander(clinten, sella)\nRealized(mathias)\nBrushy(sella)\nRealized(sella)\nGore(sella, clinten)\nforall x (Firm(x) -> Gore(x, mathias))\nforall x (Gore(x, sella) -> Gore(x, clinten))\nforall x (Battle(x, sella) -> Battle(sella, clinten))\nforall x (Brushy(x) and Battle(x, clinten) -> Gore(clinten, sella))\nforall x (Perennial(x) and Slander(x, clinten) -> Gore(clinten, sella))\nnot Perennial(clinten) -> Slander(clinten, mathias)\n\nBattle(clinten, clinten)\n\nBattle(clinten, clinten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The scotti jewel the merissa. The scotti jewel the henryetta. The scotti mouse the henryetta. The merissa is cancroid. The henryetta is heedless. The henryetta is cancroid. The henryetta trumpet the scotti. If someone is acetic then they need the merissa. If someone trumpet the henryetta then they need the scotti. If someone jewel the henryetta then the henryetta jewel the scotti. If someone is heedless and they chase the scotti then the scotti trumpet the henryetta. If someone is gristly and they see the scotti then the scotti trumpet the henryetta. If the scotti is not gristly then the scotti mouse the merissa. The merissa does not see the scotti.", "logic": "\nJewel(scotti, merissa)\nJewel(scotti, henryetta)\nMouse(scotti, henryetta)\nCancroid(merissa)\nHeedless(henryetta)\nCancroid(henryetta)\nTrumpet(henryetta, scotti)\nforall x (Acetic(x) -> Trumpet(x, merissa))\nforall x (Trumpet(x, henryetta) -> Trumpet(x, scotti))\nforall x (Jewel(x, henryetta) -> Jewel(henryetta, scotti))\nforall x (Heedless(x) and Jewel(x, scotti) -> Trumpet(scotti, henryetta))\nforall x (Gristly(x) and Mouse(x, scotti) -> Trumpet(scotti, henryetta))\nnot Gristly(scotti) -> Mouse(scotti, merissa)\n\nnot Mouse(merissa, scotti)\n\nnot Mouse(merissa, scotti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The lesly lenify the eli. The lesly lenify the jasmine. The lesly blubber the jasmine. The eli is astrocytic. The jasmine is tasteless. The jasmine is astrocytic. The jasmine ensconce the lesly. If someone is clean then they need the eli. If someone ensconce the jasmine then they need the lesly. If someone lenify the jasmine then the jasmine lenify the lesly. If someone is tasteless and they chase the lesly then the lesly ensconce the jasmine. If someone is impulsive and they see the lesly then the lesly ensconce the jasmine. If the lesly is not impulsive then the lesly blubber the eli. The eli blubber the eli.", "logic": "\nLenify(lesly, eli)\nLenify(lesly, jasmine)\nBlubber(lesly, jasmine)\nAstrocytic(eli)\nTasteless(jasmine)\nAstrocytic(jasmine)\nEnsconce(jasmine, lesly)\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Ensconce(x, eli))\nforall x (Ensconce(x, jasmine) -> Ensconce(x, lesly))\nforall x (Lenify(x, jasmine) -> Lenify(jasmine, lesly))\nforall x (Tasteless(x) and Lenify(x, lesly) -> Ensconce(lesly, jasmine))\nforall x (Impulsive(x) and Blubber(x, lesly) -> Ensconce(lesly, jasmine))\nnot Impulsive(lesly) -> Blubber(lesly, eli)\n\nBlubber(eli, eli)\n\nBlubber(eli, eli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The lurette swallow the thalia. The lurette is not saclike. The lurette is grainy. The lurette is not ephemeral. The lurette is not unspotted. The lurette is not lengthways. The lurette plonk the thalia. The lurette does not need the thalia. The thalia swallow the lurette. The thalia is saclike. The thalia does not like the lurette. The thalia does not need the lurette. If something plonk the thalia then it swallow the thalia. If something plonk the thalia then the thalia is grainy. If something is grainy then it plonk the thalia. If something is saclike then it does not need the thalia. If the lurette launder the thalia then the thalia swallow the lurette. If the thalia plonk the lurette and the lurette swallow the thalia then the lurette plonk the thalia. If the thalia plonk the lurette then the thalia is not saclike. If the thalia launder the lurette and the lurette does not chase the thalia then the thalia is ephemeral. The thalia swallow the lurette.", "logic": "\nSwallow(lurette, thalia)\nnot Saclike(lurette)\nGrainy(lurette)\nnot Ephemeral(lurette)\nnot Unspotted(lurette)\nnot Lengthways(lurette)\nPlonk(lurette, thalia)\nnot Launder(lurette, thalia)\nSwallow(thalia, lurette)\nSaclike(thalia)\nnot Plonk(thalia, lurette)\nnot Launder(thalia, lurette)\nforall x (Plonk(x, thalia) -> Swallow(x, thalia))\nforall x (Plonk(x, thalia) -> Grainy(thalia))\nforall x (Grainy(x) -> Plonk(x, thalia))\nforall x (Saclike(x) -> not Launder(x, thalia))\nLaunder(lurette, thalia) -> Swallow(thalia, lurette)\nPlonk(thalia, lurette) and Swallow(lurette, thalia) -> Plonk(lurette, thalia)\nPlonk(thalia, lurette) -> not Saclike(thalia)\nLaunder(thalia, lurette) and not Swallow(lurette, thalia) -> Ephemeral(thalia)\n\nSwallow(thalia, lurette)\n\ntherefore Swallow(thalia, lurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The rozele factorise the chriss. The rozele is not effusive. The rozele is offstage. The rozele is not stripped. The rozele is not dismissive. The rozele is not connubial. The rozele farm the chriss. The rozele does not need the chriss. The chriss factorise the rozele. The chriss is effusive. The chriss does not like the rozele. The chriss does not need the rozele. If something farm the chriss then it factorise the chriss. If something farm the chriss then the chriss is offstage. If something is offstage then it farm the chriss. If something is effusive then it does not need the chriss. If the rozele drawl the chriss then the chriss factorise the rozele. If the chriss farm the rozele and the rozele factorise the chriss then the rozele farm the chriss. If the chriss farm the rozele then the chriss is not effusive. If the chriss drawl the rozele and the rozele does not chase the chriss then the chriss is stripped. The chriss does not chase the rozele.", "logic": "\nFactorise(rozele, chriss)\nnot Effusive(rozele)\nOffstage(rozele)\nnot Stripped(rozele)\nnot Dismissive(rozele)\nnot Connubial(rozele)\nFarm(rozele, chriss)\nnot Drawl(rozele, chriss)\nFactorise(chriss, rozele)\nEffusive(chriss)\nnot Farm(chriss, rozele)\nnot Drawl(chriss, rozele)\nforall x (Farm(x, chriss) -> Factorise(x, chriss))\nforall x (Farm(x, chriss) -> Offstage(chriss))\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Farm(x, chriss))\nforall x (Effusive(x) -> not Drawl(x, chriss))\nDrawl(rozele, chriss) -> Factorise(chriss, rozele)\nFarm(chriss, rozele) and Factorise(rozele, chriss) -> Farm(rozele, chriss)\nFarm(chriss, rozele) -> not Effusive(chriss)\nDrawl(chriss, rozele) and not Factorise(rozele, chriss) -> Stripped(chriss)\n\nnot Factorise(chriss, rozele)\n\ntherefore Factorise(chriss, rozele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The pris festoon the douggie. The pris is not libidinous. The pris is vowellike. The pris is not evitable. The pris is not articular. The pris is not watertight. The pris indemnify the douggie. The pris does not need the douggie. The douggie festoon the pris. The douggie is libidinous. The douggie does not like the pris. The douggie does not need the pris. If something indemnify the douggie then it festoon the douggie. If something indemnify the douggie then the douggie is vowellike. If something is vowellike then it indemnify the douggie. If something is libidinous then it does not need the douggie. If the pris compute the douggie then the douggie festoon the pris. If the douggie indemnify the pris and the pris festoon the douggie then the pris indemnify the douggie. If the douggie indemnify the pris then the douggie is not libidinous. If the douggie compute the pris and the pris does not chase the douggie then the douggie is evitable. The douggie does not need the douggie.", "logic": "\nFestoon(pris, douggie)\nnot Libidinous(pris)\nVowellike(pris)\nnot Evitable(pris)\nnot Articular(pris)\nnot Watertight(pris)\nIndemnify(pris, douggie)\nnot Compute(pris, douggie)\nFestoon(douggie, pris)\nLibidinous(douggie)\nnot Indemnify(douggie, pris)\nnot Compute(douggie, pris)\nforall x (Indemnify(x, douggie) -> Festoon(x, douggie))\nforall x (Indemnify(x, douggie) -> Vowellike(douggie))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Indemnify(x, douggie))\nforall x (Libidinous(x) -> not Compute(x, douggie))\nCompute(pris, douggie) -> Festoon(douggie, pris)\nIndemnify(douggie, pris) and Festoon(pris, douggie) -> Indemnify(pris, douggie)\nIndemnify(douggie, pris) -> not Libidinous(douggie)\nCompute(douggie, pris) and not Festoon(pris, douggie) -> Evitable(douggie)\n\nnot Compute(douggie, douggie)\n\nLibidinous(douggie) and forall x (Libidinous(x) -> not Compute(x, douggie)) -> therefore not Compute(douggie, douggie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The ignazio didder the lucien. The ignazio is not bush. The ignazio is numerous. The ignazio is not pathogenic. The ignazio is not stupid. The ignazio is not structured. The ignazio irrigate the lucien. The ignazio does not need the lucien. The lucien didder the ignazio. The lucien is bush. The lucien does not like the ignazio. The lucien does not need the ignazio. If something irrigate the lucien then it didder the lucien. If something irrigate the lucien then the lucien is numerous. If something is numerous then it irrigate the lucien. If something is bush then it does not need the lucien. If the ignazio design the lucien then the lucien didder the ignazio. If the lucien irrigate the ignazio and the ignazio didder the lucien then the ignazio irrigate the lucien. If the lucien irrigate the ignazio then the lucien is not bush. If the lucien design the ignazio and the ignazio does not chase the lucien then the lucien is pathogenic. The lucien is not numerous.", "logic": "\nDidder(ignazio, lucien)\nnot Bush(ignazio)\nNumerous(ignazio)\nnot Pathogenic(ignazio)\nnot Stupid(ignazio)\nnot Structured(ignazio)\nIrrigate(ignazio, lucien)\nnot Design(ignazio, lucien)\nDidder(lucien, ignazio)\nBush(lucien)\nnot Irrigate(lucien, ignazio)\nnot Design(lucien, ignazio)\nforall x (Irrigate(x, lucien) -> Didder(x, lucien))\nforall x (Irrigate(x, lucien) -> Numerous(lucien))\nforall x (Numerous(x) -> Irrigate(x, lucien))\nforall x (Bush(x) -> not Design(x, lucien))\nDesign(ignazio, lucien) -> Didder(lucien, ignazio)\nIrrigate(lucien, ignazio) and Didder(ignazio, lucien) -> Irrigate(ignazio, lucien)\nIrrigate(lucien, ignazio) -> not Bush(lucien)\nDesign(lucien, ignazio) and not Didder(ignazio, lucien) -> Pathogenic(lucien)\n\nnot Numerous(lucien)\n\nIrrigate(ignazio, lucien) and forall x (Irrigate(x, lucien) -> Numerous(lucien)) -> therefore Numerous(lucien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The tracey breathe the glad. The tracey is not vile. The tracey is reluctant. The tracey is not smelling. The tracey is not litigious. The tracey is not least. The tracey surf the glad. The tracey does not need the glad. The glad breathe the tracey. The glad is vile. The glad does not like the tracey. The glad does not need the tracey. If something surf the glad then it breathe the glad. If something surf the glad then the glad is reluctant. If something is reluctant then it surf the glad. If something is vile then it does not need the glad. If the tracey repent the glad then the glad breathe the tracey. If the glad surf the tracey and the tracey breathe the glad then the tracey surf the glad. If the glad surf the tracey then the glad is not vile. If the glad repent the tracey and the tracey does not chase the glad then the glad is smelling. The glad surf the glad.", "logic": "\nBreathe(tracey, glad)\nnot Vile(tracey)\nReluctant(tracey)\nnot Smelling(tracey)\nnot Litigious(tracey)\nnot Least(tracey)\nSurf(tracey, glad)\nnot Repent(tracey, glad)\nBreathe(glad, tracey)\nVile(glad)\nnot Surf(glad, tracey)\nnot Repent(glad, tracey)\nforall x (Surf(x, glad) -> Breathe(x, glad))\nforall x (Surf(x, glad) -> Reluctant(glad))\nforall x (Reluctant(x) -> Surf(x, glad))\nforall x (Vile(x) -> not Repent(x, glad))\nRepent(tracey, glad) -> Breathe(glad, tracey)\nSurf(glad, tracey) and Breathe(tracey, glad) -> Surf(tracey, glad)\nSurf(glad, tracey) -> not Vile(glad)\nRepent(glad, tracey) and not Breathe(tracey, glad) -> Smelling(glad)\n\nSurf(glad, glad)\n\nSurf(tracey, glad) and forall x (Surf(x, glad) -> Reluctant(glad)) -> therefore Reluctant(glad) Reluctant(glad) and forall x (Reluctant(x) -> Surf(x, glad)) -> therefore Surf(glad, glad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The quintana prey the dian. The quintana is not viewless. The quintana is pseudo. The quintana is not cheesy. The quintana is not rainy. The quintana is not appetizing. The quintana cosset the dian. The quintana does not need the dian. The dian prey the quintana. The dian is viewless. The dian does not like the quintana. The dian does not need the quintana. If something cosset the dian then it prey the dian. If something cosset the dian then the dian is pseudo. If something is pseudo then it cosset the dian. If something is viewless then it does not need the dian. If the quintana flocculate the dian then the dian prey the quintana. If the dian cosset the quintana and the quintana prey the dian then the quintana cosset the dian. If the dian cosset the quintana then the dian is not viewless. If the dian flocculate the quintana and the quintana does not chase the dian then the dian is cheesy. The dian does not like the dian.", "logic": "\nPrey(quintana, dian)\nnot Viewless(quintana)\nPseudo(quintana)\nnot Cheesy(quintana)\nnot Rainy(quintana)\nnot Appetizing(quintana)\nCosset(quintana, dian)\nnot Flocculate(quintana, dian)\nPrey(dian, quintana)\nViewless(dian)\nnot Cosset(dian, quintana)\nnot Flocculate(dian, quintana)\nforall x (Cosset(x, dian) -> Prey(x, dian))\nforall x (Cosset(x, dian) -> Pseudo(dian))\nforall x (Pseudo(x) -> Cosset(x, dian))\nforall x (Viewless(x) -> not Flocculate(x, dian))\nFlocculate(quintana, dian) -> Prey(dian, quintana)\nCosset(dian, quintana) and Prey(quintana, dian) -> Cosset(quintana, dian)\nCosset(dian, quintana) -> not Viewless(dian)\nFlocculate(dian, quintana) and not Prey(quintana, dian) -> Cheesy(dian)\n\nnot Cosset(dian, dian)\n\nCosset(quintana, dian) and forall x (Cosset(x, dian) -> Pseudo(dian)) -> therefore Pseudo(dian) Pseudo(dian) and forall x (Pseudo(x) -> Cosset(x, dian)) -> therefore Cosset(dian, dian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The candace sidle the jolynn. The candace is not labiate. The candace is brownish. The candace is not biomedical. The candace is not tiresome. The candace is not ptolemaic. The candace wane the jolynn. The candace does not need the jolynn. The jolynn sidle the candace. The jolynn is labiate. The jolynn does not like the candace. The jolynn does not need the candace. If something wane the jolynn then it sidle the jolynn. If something wane the jolynn then the jolynn is brownish. If something is brownish then it wane the jolynn. If something is labiate then it does not need the jolynn. If the candace tend the jolynn then the jolynn sidle the candace. If the jolynn wane the candace and the candace sidle the jolynn then the candace wane the jolynn. If the jolynn wane the candace then the jolynn is not labiate. If the jolynn tend the candace and the candace does not chase the jolynn then the jolynn is biomedical. The jolynn sidle the jolynn.", "logic": "\nSidle(candace, jolynn)\nnot Labiate(candace)\nBrownish(candace)\nnot Biomedical(candace)\nnot Tiresome(candace)\nnot Ptolemaic(candace)\nWane(candace, jolynn)\nnot Tend(candace, jolynn)\nSidle(jolynn, candace)\nLabiate(jolynn)\nnot Wane(jolynn, candace)\nnot Tend(jolynn, candace)\nforall x (Wane(x, jolynn) -> Sidle(x, jolynn))\nforall x (Wane(x, jolynn) -> Brownish(jolynn))\nforall x (Brownish(x) -> Wane(x, jolynn))\nforall x (Labiate(x) -> not Tend(x, jolynn))\nTend(candace, jolynn) -> Sidle(jolynn, candace)\nWane(jolynn, candace) and Sidle(candace, jolynn) -> Wane(candace, jolynn)\nWane(jolynn, candace) -> not Labiate(jolynn)\nTend(jolynn, candace) and not Sidle(candace, jolynn) -> Biomedical(jolynn)\n\nSidle(jolynn, jolynn)\n\nWane(candace, jolynn) and forall x (Wane(x, jolynn) -> Brownish(jolynn)) -> therefore Brownish(jolynn) Brownish(jolynn) and forall x (Brownish(x) -> Wane(x, jolynn)) -> therefore Wane(jolynn, jolynn) Wane(jolynn, jolynn) and forall x (Wane(x, jolynn) -> Sidle(x, jolynn)) -> therefore Sidle(jolynn, jolynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The marwin summons the terry. The marwin is not frolicky. The marwin is saxicoline. The marwin is not voluble. The marwin is not ranging. The marwin is not lighted. The marwin boob the terry. The marwin does not need the terry. The terry summons the marwin. The terry is frolicky. The terry does not like the marwin. The terry does not need the marwin. If something boob the terry then it summons the terry. If something boob the terry then the terry is saxicoline. If something is saxicoline then it boob the terry. If something is frolicky then it does not need the terry. If the marwin cooper the terry then the terry summons the marwin. If the terry boob the marwin and the marwin summons the terry then the marwin boob the terry. If the terry boob the marwin then the terry is not frolicky. If the terry cooper the marwin and the marwin does not chase the terry then the terry is voluble. The terry does not chase the terry.", "logic": "\nSummons(marwin, terry)\nnot Frolicky(marwin)\nSaxicoline(marwin)\nnot Voluble(marwin)\nnot Ranging(marwin)\nnot Lighted(marwin)\nBoob(marwin, terry)\nnot Cooper(marwin, terry)\nSummons(terry, marwin)\nFrolicky(terry)\nnot Boob(terry, marwin)\nnot Cooper(terry, marwin)\nforall x (Boob(x, terry) -> Summons(x, terry))\nforall x (Boob(x, terry) -> Saxicoline(terry))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Boob(x, terry))\nforall x (Frolicky(x) -> not Cooper(x, terry))\nCooper(marwin, terry) -> Summons(terry, marwin)\nBoob(terry, marwin) and Summons(marwin, terry) -> Boob(marwin, terry)\nBoob(terry, marwin) -> not Frolicky(terry)\nCooper(terry, marwin) and not Summons(marwin, terry) -> Voluble(terry)\n\nnot Summons(terry, terry)\n\nBoob(marwin, terry) and forall x (Boob(x, terry) -> Saxicoline(terry)) -> therefore Saxicoline(terry) Saxicoline(terry) and forall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Boob(x, terry)) -> therefore Boob(terry, terry) Boob(terry, terry) and forall x (Boob(x, terry) -> Summons(x, terry)) -> therefore Summons(terry, terry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The carmita contest the collete. The carmita is not nonrigid. The carmita is newsy. The carmita is not effusive. The carmita is not speckled. The carmita is not noncrucial. The carmita amend the collete. The carmita does not need the collete. The collete contest the carmita. The collete is nonrigid. The collete does not like the carmita. The collete does not need the carmita. If something amend the collete then it contest the collete. If something amend the collete then the collete is newsy. If something is newsy then it amend the collete. If something is nonrigid then it does not need the collete. If the carmita shred the collete then the collete contest the carmita. If the collete amend the carmita and the carmita contest the collete then the carmita amend the collete. If the collete amend the carmita then the collete is not nonrigid. If the collete shred the carmita and the carmita does not chase the collete then the collete is effusive. The collete is not effusive.", "logic": "\nContest(carmita, collete)\nnot Nonrigid(carmita)\nNewsy(carmita)\nnot Effusive(carmita)\nnot Speckled(carmita)\nnot Noncrucial(carmita)\nAmend(carmita, collete)\nnot Shred(carmita, collete)\nContest(collete, carmita)\nNonrigid(collete)\nnot Amend(collete, carmita)\nnot Shred(collete, carmita)\nforall x (Amend(x, collete) -> Contest(x, collete))\nforall x (Amend(x, collete) -> Newsy(collete))\nforall x (Newsy(x) -> Amend(x, collete))\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) -> not Shred(x, collete))\nShred(carmita, collete) -> Contest(collete, carmita)\nAmend(collete, carmita) and Contest(carmita, collete) -> Amend(carmita, collete)\nAmend(collete, carmita) -> not Nonrigid(collete)\nShred(collete, carmita) and not Contest(carmita, collete) -> Effusive(collete)\n\nnot Effusive(collete)\n\nShred(collete, carmita) and not Contest(carmita, collete) -> Effusive(collete) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The ethan bond the marysa. The ethan is not built. The ethan is mutational. The ethan is not cervical. The ethan is not thinkable. The ethan is not westbound. The ethan sibilate the marysa. The ethan does not need the marysa. The marysa bond the ethan. The marysa is built. The marysa does not like the ethan. The marysa does not need the ethan. If something sibilate the marysa then it bond the marysa. If something sibilate the marysa then the marysa is mutational. If something is mutational then it sibilate the marysa. If something is built then it does not need the marysa. If the ethan readjust the marysa then the marysa bond the ethan. If the marysa sibilate the ethan and the ethan bond the marysa then the ethan sibilate the marysa. If the marysa sibilate the ethan then the marysa is not built. If the marysa readjust the ethan and the ethan does not chase the marysa then the marysa is cervical. The marysa is westbound.", "logic": "\nBond(ethan, marysa)\nnot Built(ethan)\nMutational(ethan)\nnot Cervical(ethan)\nnot Thinkable(ethan)\nnot Westbound(ethan)\nSibilate(ethan, marysa)\nnot Readjust(ethan, marysa)\nBond(marysa, ethan)\nBuilt(marysa)\nnot Sibilate(marysa, ethan)\nnot Readjust(marysa, ethan)\nforall x (Sibilate(x, marysa) -> Bond(x, marysa))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, marysa) -> Mutational(marysa))\nforall x (Mutational(x) -> Sibilate(x, marysa))\nforall x (Built(x) -> not Readjust(x, marysa))\nReadjust(ethan, marysa) -> Bond(marysa, ethan)\nSibilate(marysa, ethan) and Bond(ethan, marysa) -> Sibilate(ethan, marysa)\nSibilate(marysa, ethan) -> not Built(marysa)\nReadjust(marysa, ethan) and not Bond(ethan, marysa) -> Cervical(marysa)\n\nWestbound(marysa)\n\nWestbound(marysa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The bay tame the teodoor. The bay is not reedlike. The bay is revised. The bay is not pedal. The bay is not deweyan. The bay is not homesick. The bay misdate the teodoor. The bay does not need the teodoor. The teodoor tame the bay. The teodoor is reedlike. The teodoor does not like the bay. The teodoor does not need the bay. If something misdate the teodoor then it tame the teodoor. If something misdate the teodoor then the teodoor is revised. If something is revised then it misdate the teodoor. If something is reedlike then it does not need the teodoor. If the bay acuminate the teodoor then the teodoor tame the bay. If the teodoor misdate the bay and the bay tame the teodoor then the bay misdate the teodoor. If the teodoor misdate the bay then the teodoor is not reedlike. If the teodoor acuminate the bay and the bay does not chase the teodoor then the teodoor is pedal. The bay does not like the bay.", "logic": "\nTame(bay, teodoor)\nnot Reedlike(bay)\nRevised(bay)\nnot Pedal(bay)\nnot Deweyan(bay)\nnot Homesick(bay)\nMisdate(bay, teodoor)\nnot Acuminate(bay, teodoor)\nTame(teodoor, bay)\nReedlike(teodoor)\nnot Misdate(teodoor, bay)\nnot Acuminate(teodoor, bay)\nforall x (Misdate(x, teodoor) -> Tame(x, teodoor))\nforall x (Misdate(x, teodoor) -> Revised(teodoor))\nforall x (Revised(x) -> Misdate(x, teodoor))\nforall x (Reedlike(x) -> not Acuminate(x, teodoor))\nAcuminate(bay, teodoor) -> Tame(teodoor, bay)\nMisdate(teodoor, bay) and Tame(bay, teodoor) -> Misdate(bay, teodoor)\nMisdate(teodoor, bay) -> not Reedlike(teodoor)\nAcuminate(teodoor, bay) and not Tame(bay, teodoor) -> Pedal(teodoor)\n\nnot Misdate(bay, bay)\n\nnot Misdate(bay, bay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The earle push the rubie. The earle is not sisterly. The earle is timed. The earle is not unshoed. The earle is not fabulous. The earle is not tuppeny. The earle bracket the rubie. The earle does not need the rubie. The rubie push the earle. The rubie is sisterly. The rubie does not like the earle. The rubie does not need the earle. If something bracket the rubie then it push the rubie. If something bracket the rubie then the rubie is timed. If something is timed then it bracket the rubie. If something is sisterly then it does not need the rubie. If the earle bifurcate the rubie then the rubie push the earle. If the rubie bracket the earle and the earle push the rubie then the earle bracket the rubie. If the rubie bracket the earle then the rubie is not sisterly. If the rubie bifurcate the earle and the earle does not chase the rubie then the rubie is unshoed. The earle bifurcate the earle.", "logic": "\nPush(earle, rubie)\nnot Sisterly(earle)\nTimed(earle)\nnot Unshoed(earle)\nnot Fabulous(earle)\nnot Tuppeny(earle)\nBracket(earle, rubie)\nnot Bifurcate(earle, rubie)\nPush(rubie, earle)\nSisterly(rubie)\nnot Bracket(rubie, earle)\nnot Bifurcate(rubie, earle)\nforall x (Bracket(x, rubie) -> Push(x, rubie))\nforall x (Bracket(x, rubie) -> Timed(rubie))\nforall x (Timed(x) -> Bracket(x, rubie))\nforall x (Sisterly(x) -> not Bifurcate(x, rubie))\nBifurcate(earle, rubie) -> Push(rubie, earle)\nBracket(rubie, earle) and Push(earle, rubie) -> Bracket(earle, rubie)\nBracket(rubie, earle) -> not Sisterly(rubie)\nBifurcate(rubie, earle) and not Push(earle, rubie) -> Unshoed(rubie)\n\nBifurcate(earle, earle)\n\nBifurcate(earle, earle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The everett regain the robyn. The everett is not stinking. The everett is secular. The everett is not glistening. The everett is not dizygous. The everett is not costive. The everett curtsey the robyn. The everett does not need the robyn. The robyn regain the everett. The robyn is stinking. The robyn does not like the everett. The robyn does not need the everett. If something curtsey the robyn then it regain the robyn. If something curtsey the robyn then the robyn is secular. If something is secular then it curtsey the robyn. If something is stinking then it does not need the robyn. If the everett nictitate the robyn then the robyn regain the everett. If the robyn curtsey the everett and the everett regain the robyn then the everett curtsey the robyn. If the robyn curtsey the everett then the robyn is not stinking. If the robyn nictitate the everett and the everett does not chase the robyn then the robyn is glistening. The everett does not chase the everett.", "logic": "\nRegain(everett, robyn)\nnot Stinking(everett)\nSecular(everett)\nnot Glistening(everett)\nnot Dizygous(everett)\nnot Costive(everett)\nCurtsey(everett, robyn)\nnot Nictitate(everett, robyn)\nRegain(robyn, everett)\nStinking(robyn)\nnot Curtsey(robyn, everett)\nnot Nictitate(robyn, everett)\nforall x (Curtsey(x, robyn) -> Regain(x, robyn))\nforall x (Curtsey(x, robyn) -> Secular(robyn))\nforall x (Secular(x) -> Curtsey(x, robyn))\nforall x (Stinking(x) -> not Nictitate(x, robyn))\nNictitate(everett, robyn) -> Regain(robyn, everett)\nCurtsey(robyn, everett) and Regain(everett, robyn) -> Curtsey(everett, robyn)\nCurtsey(robyn, everett) -> not Stinking(robyn)\nNictitate(robyn, everett) and not Regain(everett, robyn) -> Glistening(robyn)\n\nnot Regain(everett, everett)\n\nnot Regain(everett, everett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "The justin queen the whitman. The justin is not peruked. The justin is colourful. The justin is not portrayed. The justin is not superb. The justin is not hindering. The justin consent the whitman. The justin does not need the whitman. The whitman queen the justin. The whitman is peruked. The whitman does not like the justin. The whitman does not need the justin. If something consent the whitman then it queen the whitman. If something consent the whitman then the whitman is colourful. If something is colourful then it consent the whitman. If something is peruked then it does not need the whitman. If the justin deglaze the whitman then the whitman queen the justin. If the whitman consent the justin and the justin queen the whitman then the justin consent the whitman. If the whitman consent the justin then the whitman is not peruked. If the whitman deglaze the justin and the justin does not chase the whitman then the whitman is portrayed. The whitman is superb.", "logic": "\nQueen(justin, whitman)\nnot Peruked(justin)\nColourful(justin)\nnot Portrayed(justin)\nnot Superb(justin)\nnot Hindering(justin)\nConsent(justin, whitman)\nnot Deglaze(justin, whitman)\nQueen(whitman, justin)\nPeruked(whitman)\nnot Consent(whitman, justin)\nnot Deglaze(whitman, justin)\nforall x (Consent(x, whitman) -> Queen(x, whitman))\nforall x (Consent(x, whitman) -> Colourful(whitman))\nforall x (Colourful(x) -> Consent(x, whitman))\nforall x (Peruked(x) -> not Deglaze(x, whitman))\nDeglaze(justin, whitman) -> Queen(whitman, justin)\nConsent(whitman, justin) and Queen(justin, whitman) -> Consent(justin, whitman)\nConsent(whitman, justin) -> not Peruked(whitman)\nDeglaze(whitman, justin) and not Queen(justin, whitman) -> Portrayed(whitman)\n\nSuperb(whitman)\n\nSuperb(whitman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1208"} {"premises": "Bernhard is indecorous. Bernhard is unruffled. Bernhard is visionary. Bernhard is sunburnt. Bernhard is rarefied. Bernhard is anurous. Ximenes is unruffled. Ximenes is visionary. Jemmie is unruffled. Jemmie is visionary. Jemmie is fruticose. Jemmie is anurous. If Ximenes is rarefied then Ximenes is sunburnt. Smart things are fruticose. Smart, indecorous things are visionary. If something is anurous and fruticose then it is rarefied. White, sunburnt things are indecorous. Green, sunburnt things are rarefied. Nice things are anurous. If something is unruffled then it is sunburnt. Jemmie is fruticose.", "logic": "\nIndecorous(bernhard)\nUnruffled(bernhard)\nVisionary(bernhard)\nSunburnt(bernhard)\nRarefied(bernhard)\nAnurous(bernhard)\nUnruffled(ximenes)\nVisionary(ximenes)\nUnruffled(jemmie)\nVisionary(jemmie)\nFruticose(jemmie)\nAnurous(jemmie)\nRarefied(ximenes) -> Sunburnt(ximenes)\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> Fruticose(x))\nforall x (Rarefied(x) and Indecorous(x) -> Visionary(x))\nforall x (Anurous(x) and Fruticose(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Anurous(x) and Sunburnt(x) -> Indecorous(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) and Sunburnt(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Visionary(x) -> Anurous(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Sunburnt(x))\n\nFruticose(jemmie)\n\ntherefore Fruticose(jemmie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Vivienne is indusial. Vivienne is moldable. Vivienne is sapless. Vivienne is painted. Vivienne is fungoid. Vivienne is corrupting. Yevette is moldable. Yevette is sapless. Barbie is moldable. Barbie is sapless. Barbie is verbal. Barbie is corrupting. If Yevette is fungoid then Yevette is painted. Smart things are verbal. Smart, indusial things are sapless. If something is corrupting and verbal then it is fungoid. White, painted things are indusial. Green, painted things are fungoid. Nice things are corrupting. If something is moldable then it is painted. Barbie is not sapless.", "logic": "\nIndusial(vivienne)\nMoldable(vivienne)\nSapless(vivienne)\nPainted(vivienne)\nFungoid(vivienne)\nCorrupting(vivienne)\nMoldable(yevette)\nSapless(yevette)\nMoldable(barbie)\nSapless(barbie)\nVerbal(barbie)\nCorrupting(barbie)\nFungoid(yevette) -> Painted(yevette)\nforall x (Fungoid(x) -> Verbal(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and Indusial(x) -> Sapless(x))\nforall x (Corrupting(x) and Verbal(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Corrupting(x) and Painted(x) -> Indusial(x))\nforall x (Moldable(x) and Painted(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nforall x (Moldable(x) -> Painted(x))\n\nnot Sapless(barbie)\n\ntherefore Sapless(barbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Isaak is genoese. Isaak is strapless. Isaak is ossified. Isaak is overgrown. Isaak is unselfish. Isaak is equanimous. Claus is strapless. Claus is ossified. Chen is strapless. Chen is ossified. Chen is emblematic. Chen is equanimous. If Claus is unselfish then Claus is overgrown. Smart things are emblematic. Smart, genoese things are ossified. If something is equanimous and emblematic then it is unselfish. White, overgrown things are genoese. Green, overgrown things are unselfish. Nice things are equanimous. If something is strapless then it is overgrown. Isaak is emblematic.", "logic": "\nGenoese(isaak)\nStrapless(isaak)\nOssified(isaak)\nOvergrown(isaak)\nUnselfish(isaak)\nEquanimous(isaak)\nStrapless(claus)\nOssified(claus)\nStrapless(chen)\nOssified(chen)\nEmblematic(chen)\nEquanimous(chen)\nUnselfish(claus) -> Overgrown(claus)\nforall x (Unselfish(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Unselfish(x) and Genoese(x) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Equanimous(x) and Emblematic(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Equanimous(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Equanimous(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) -> Overgrown(x))\n\nEmblematic(isaak)\n\nUnselfish(isaak) and forall x (Unselfish(x) -> Emblematic(x)) -> therefore Emblematic(isaak)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Denni is duncish. Denni is unattached. Denni is suchlike. Denni is touchable. Denni is bahamian. Denni is behind. Barnie is unattached. Barnie is suchlike. Cyb is unattached. Cyb is suchlike. Cyb is subliminal. Cyb is behind. If Barnie is bahamian then Barnie is touchable. Smart things are subliminal. Smart, duncish things are suchlike. If something is behind and subliminal then it is bahamian. White, touchable things are duncish. Green, touchable things are bahamian. Nice things are behind. If something is unattached then it is touchable. Barnie is not behind.", "logic": "\nDuncish(denni)\nUnattached(denni)\nSuchlike(denni)\nTouchable(denni)\nBahamian(denni)\nBehind(denni)\nUnattached(barnie)\nSuchlike(barnie)\nUnattached(cyb)\nSuchlike(cyb)\nSubliminal(cyb)\nBehind(cyb)\nBahamian(barnie) -> Touchable(barnie)\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) and Duncish(x) -> Suchlike(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) and Subliminal(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) and Touchable(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and Touchable(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Suchlike(x) -> Behind(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) -> Touchable(x))\n\nnot Behind(barnie)\n\nSuchlike(barnie) and forall x (Suchlike(x) -> Behind(x)) -> therefore Behind(barnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Vern is stovepiped. Vern is sinhala. Vern is lemonlike. Vern is inundated. Vern is newtonian. Vern is bipartite. Lemar is sinhala. Lemar is lemonlike. Cassondra is sinhala. Cassondra is lemonlike. Cassondra is numerable. Cassondra is bipartite. If Lemar is newtonian then Lemar is inundated. Smart things are numerable. Smart, stovepiped things are lemonlike. If something is bipartite and numerable then it is newtonian. White, inundated things are stovepiped. Green, inundated things are newtonian. Nice things are bipartite. If something is sinhala then it is inundated. Lemar is newtonian.", "logic": "\nStovepiped(vern)\nSinhala(vern)\nLemonlike(vern)\nInundated(vern)\nNewtonian(vern)\nBipartite(vern)\nSinhala(lemar)\nLemonlike(lemar)\nSinhala(cassondra)\nLemonlike(cassondra)\nNumerable(cassondra)\nBipartite(cassondra)\nNewtonian(lemar) -> Inundated(lemar)\nforall x (Newtonian(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Newtonian(x) and Stovepiped(x) -> Lemonlike(x))\nforall x (Bipartite(x) and Numerable(x) -> Newtonian(x))\nforall x (Bipartite(x) and Inundated(x) -> Stovepiped(x))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) and Inundated(x) -> Newtonian(x))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Bipartite(x))\nforall x (Sinhala(x) -> Inundated(x))\n\nNewtonian(lemar)\n\nSinhala(lemar) and forall x (Sinhala(x) -> Inundated(x)) -> therefore Inundated(lemar) Sinhala(lemar) and Inundated(lemar) and forall x (Sinhala(x) and Inundated(x) -> Newtonian(x)) -> therefore Newtonian(lemar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Noellyn is maniclike. Noellyn is thickening. Noellyn is unhygienic. Noellyn is childless. Noellyn is bandaged. Noellyn is babelike. Melessa is thickening. Melessa is unhygienic. Kevyn is thickening. Kevyn is unhygienic. Kevyn is arrogant. Kevyn is babelike. If Melessa is bandaged then Melessa is childless. Smart things are arrogant. Smart, maniclike things are unhygienic. If something is babelike and arrogant then it is bandaged. White, childless things are maniclike. Green, childless things are bandaged. Nice things are babelike. If something is thickening then it is childless. Melessa is not maniclike.", "logic": "\nManiclike(noellyn)\nThickening(noellyn)\nUnhygienic(noellyn)\nChildless(noellyn)\nBandaged(noellyn)\nBabelike(noellyn)\nThickening(melessa)\nUnhygienic(melessa)\nThickening(kevyn)\nUnhygienic(kevyn)\nArrogant(kevyn)\nBabelike(kevyn)\nBandaged(melessa) -> Childless(melessa)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> Arrogant(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) and Maniclike(x) -> Unhygienic(x))\nforall x (Babelike(x) and Arrogant(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Babelike(x) and Childless(x) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Thickening(x) and Childless(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Unhygienic(x) -> Babelike(x))\nforall x (Thickening(x) -> Childless(x))\n\nnot Maniclike(melessa)\n\nUnhygienic(melessa) and forall x (Unhygienic(x) -> Babelike(x)) -> therefore Babelike(melessa) Thickening(melessa) and forall x (Thickening(x) -> Childless(x)) -> therefore Childless(melessa) Babelike(melessa) and Childless(melessa) and forall x (Babelike(x) and Childless(x) -> Maniclike(x)) -> therefore Maniclike(melessa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Kingsley is celluloid. Kingsley is presto. Kingsley is lengthways. Kingsley is parametric. Kingsley is exulting. Kingsley is blistery. Patsy is presto. Patsy is lengthways. Trever is presto. Trever is lengthways. Trever is tarsal. Trever is blistery. If Patsy is exulting then Patsy is parametric. Smart things are tarsal. Smart, celluloid things are lengthways. If something is blistery and tarsal then it is exulting. White, parametric things are celluloid. Green, parametric things are exulting. Nice things are blistery. If something is presto then it is parametric. Patsy is tarsal.", "logic": "\nCelluloid(kingsley)\nPresto(kingsley)\nLengthways(kingsley)\nParametric(kingsley)\nExulting(kingsley)\nBlistery(kingsley)\nPresto(patsy)\nLengthways(patsy)\nPresto(trever)\nLengthways(trever)\nTarsal(trever)\nBlistery(trever)\nExulting(patsy) -> Parametric(patsy)\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Tarsal(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) and Celluloid(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Tarsal(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) and Parametric(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Presto(x) and Parametric(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Presto(x) -> Parametric(x))\n\nTarsal(patsy)\n\nPresto(patsy) and forall x (Presto(x) -> Parametric(x)) -> therefore Parametric(patsy) Presto(patsy) and Parametric(patsy) and forall x (Presto(x) and Parametric(x) -> Exulting(x)) -> therefore Exulting(patsy) Exulting(patsy) and forall x (Exulting(x) -> Tarsal(x)) -> therefore Tarsal(patsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "Ulla is disjoined. Ulla is kaput. Ulla is luminous. Ulla is above. Ulla is plentiful. Ulla is sacrosanct. Ofilia is kaput. Ofilia is luminous. Anatole is kaput. Anatole is luminous. Anatole is subliminal. Anatole is sacrosanct. If Ofilia is plentiful then Ofilia is above. Smart things are subliminal. Smart, disjoined things are luminous. If something is sacrosanct and subliminal then it is plentiful. White, above things are disjoined. Green, above things are plentiful. Nice things are sacrosanct. If something is kaput then it is above. Ofilia is not subliminal.", "logic": "\nDisjoined(ulla)\nKaput(ulla)\nLuminous(ulla)\nAbove(ulla)\nPlentiful(ulla)\nSacrosanct(ulla)\nKaput(ofilia)\nLuminous(ofilia)\nKaput(anatole)\nLuminous(anatole)\nSubliminal(anatole)\nSacrosanct(anatole)\nPlentiful(ofilia) -> Above(ofilia)\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Plentiful(x) and Disjoined(x) -> Luminous(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Subliminal(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Above(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Kaput(x) and Above(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Luminous(x) -> Sacrosanct(x))\nforall x (Kaput(x) -> Above(x))\n\nnot Subliminal(ofilia)\n\nKaput(ofilia) and forall x (Kaput(x) -> Above(x)) -> therefore Above(ofilia) Kaput(ofilia) and Above(ofilia) and forall x (Kaput(x) and Above(x) -> Plentiful(x)) -> therefore Plentiful(ofilia) Plentiful(ofilia) and forall x (Plentiful(x) -> Subliminal(x)) -> therefore Subliminal(ofilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1088"} {"premises": "The eliot bombilate the merell. The eliot is yawning. The eliot camouflage the thomasin. The merell is unsanded. The merell is described. The merell is niffy. The merell camouflage the eliot. The merell aggrade the leticia. The thomasin bombilate the leticia. The thomasin is niffy. The leticia bombilate the eliot. The leticia is yawning. The leticia camouflage the eliot. The leticia camouflage the merell. The leticia aggrade the merell. If someone aggrade the thomasin then they are baseless. All niffy people are baseless. If someone camouflage the leticia then they chase the eliot. If someone bombilate the eliot and they are niffy then the eliot aggrade the leticia. If someone is baseless then they chase the thomasin. If someone bombilate the merell and the merell camouflage the thomasin then they need the thomasin. If someone is yawning and they chase the eliot then they are niffy. If the eliot is niffy and the eliot bombilate the leticia then the eliot is baseless. The leticia aggrade the merell.", "logic": "\nBombilate(eliot, merell)\nYawning(eliot)\nCamouflage(eliot, thomasin)\nUnsanded(merell)\nDescribed(merell)\nNiffy(merell)\nCamouflage(merell, eliot)\nAggrade(merell, leticia)\nBombilate(thomasin, leticia)\nNiffy(thomasin)\nBombilate(leticia, eliot)\nYawning(leticia)\nCamouflage(leticia, eliot)\nCamouflage(leticia, merell)\nAggrade(leticia, merell)\nforall x (Aggrade(x, thomasin) -> Baseless(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> Baseless(x))\nforall x (Camouflage(x, leticia) -> Bombilate(x, eliot))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, eliot) and Niffy(x) -> Aggrade(eliot, leticia))\nforall x (Baseless(x) -> Bombilate(x, thomasin))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, merell) and Camouflage(merell, thomasin) -> Aggrade(x, thomasin))\nforall x (Yawning(x) and Bombilate(x, eliot) -> Niffy(x))\nNiffy(eliot) and Bombilate(eliot, leticia) -> Baseless(eliot)\n\nAggrade(leticia, merell)\n\ntherefore Aggrade(leticia, merell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The hanford apprize the desirae. The hanford is bulbous. The hanford hurdle the philipa. The desirae is azonal. The desirae is energetic. The desirae is nett. The desirae hurdle the hanford. The desirae reset the sharla. The philipa apprize the sharla. The philipa is nett. The sharla apprize the hanford. The sharla is bulbous. The sharla hurdle the hanford. The sharla hurdle the desirae. The sharla reset the desirae. If someone reset the philipa then they are tearing. All nett people are tearing. If someone hurdle the sharla then they chase the hanford. If someone apprize the hanford and they are nett then the hanford reset the sharla. If someone is tearing then they chase the philipa. If someone apprize the desirae and the desirae hurdle the philipa then they need the philipa. If someone is bulbous and they chase the hanford then they are nett. If the hanford is nett and the hanford apprize the sharla then the hanford is tearing. The sharla does not chase the hanford.", "logic": "\nApprize(hanford, desirae)\nBulbous(hanford)\nHurdle(hanford, philipa)\nAzonal(desirae)\nEnergetic(desirae)\nNett(desirae)\nHurdle(desirae, hanford)\nReset(desirae, sharla)\nApprize(philipa, sharla)\nNett(philipa)\nApprize(sharla, hanford)\nBulbous(sharla)\nHurdle(sharla, hanford)\nHurdle(sharla, desirae)\nReset(sharla, desirae)\nforall x (Reset(x, philipa) -> Tearing(x))\nforall x (Nett(x) -> Tearing(x))\nforall x (Hurdle(x, sharla) -> Apprize(x, hanford))\nforall x (Apprize(x, hanford) and Nett(x) -> Reset(hanford, sharla))\nforall x (Tearing(x) -> Apprize(x, philipa))\nforall x (Apprize(x, desirae) and Hurdle(desirae, philipa) -> Reset(x, philipa))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) and Apprize(x, hanford) -> Nett(x))\nNett(hanford) and Apprize(hanford, sharla) -> Tearing(hanford)\n\nnot Apprize(sharla, hanford)\n\ntherefore Apprize(sharla, hanford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The waverly brainwash the isabelita. The waverly is tawny. The waverly metal the hussein. The isabelita is headstrong. The isabelita is parthian. The isabelita is sapiential. The isabelita metal the waverly. The isabelita ball the marcella. The hussein brainwash the marcella. The hussein is sapiential. The marcella brainwash the waverly. The marcella is tawny. The marcella metal the waverly. The marcella metal the isabelita. The marcella ball the isabelita. If someone ball the hussein then they are altered. All sapiential people are altered. If someone metal the marcella then they chase the waverly. If someone brainwash the waverly and they are sapiential then the waverly ball the marcella. If someone is altered then they chase the hussein. If someone brainwash the isabelita and the isabelita metal the hussein then they need the hussein. If someone is tawny and they chase the waverly then they are sapiential. If the waverly is sapiential and the waverly brainwash the marcella then the waverly is altered. The marcella is sapiential.", "logic": "\nBrainwash(waverly, isabelita)\nTawny(waverly)\nMetal(waverly, hussein)\nHeadstrong(isabelita)\nParthian(isabelita)\nSapiential(isabelita)\nMetal(isabelita, waverly)\nBall(isabelita, marcella)\nBrainwash(hussein, marcella)\nSapiential(hussein)\nBrainwash(marcella, waverly)\nTawny(marcella)\nMetal(marcella, waverly)\nMetal(marcella, isabelita)\nBall(marcella, isabelita)\nforall x (Ball(x, hussein) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Sapiential(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Metal(x, marcella) -> Brainwash(x, waverly))\nforall x (Brainwash(x, waverly) and Sapiential(x) -> Ball(waverly, marcella))\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Brainwash(x, hussein))\nforall x (Brainwash(x, isabelita) and Metal(isabelita, hussein) -> Ball(x, hussein))\nforall x (Tawny(x) and Brainwash(x, waverly) -> Sapiential(x))\nSapiential(waverly) and Brainwash(waverly, marcella) -> Altered(waverly)\n\nSapiential(marcella)\n\nTawny(marcella) and Brainwash(marcella, waverly) and forall x (Tawny(x) and Brainwash(x, waverly) -> Sapiential(x)) -> therefore Sapiential(marcella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The nicholle gash the shaylyn. The nicholle is infertile. The nicholle hush the suzi. The shaylyn is delicious. The shaylyn is goosy. The shaylyn is tenderised. The shaylyn hush the nicholle. The shaylyn disinter the eustacia. The suzi gash the eustacia. The suzi is tenderised. The eustacia gash the nicholle. The eustacia is infertile. The eustacia hush the nicholle. The eustacia hush the shaylyn. The eustacia disinter the shaylyn. If someone disinter the suzi then they are uniformed. All tenderised people are uniformed. If someone hush the eustacia then they chase the nicholle. If someone gash the nicholle and they are tenderised then the nicholle disinter the eustacia. If someone is uniformed then they chase the suzi. If someone gash the shaylyn and the shaylyn hush the suzi then they need the suzi. If someone is infertile and they chase the nicholle then they are tenderised. If the nicholle is tenderised and the nicholle gash the eustacia then the nicholle is uniformed. The shaylyn is not uniformed.", "logic": "\nGash(nicholle, shaylyn)\nInfertile(nicholle)\nHush(nicholle, suzi)\nDelicious(shaylyn)\nGoosy(shaylyn)\nTenderised(shaylyn)\nHush(shaylyn, nicholle)\nDisinter(shaylyn, eustacia)\nGash(suzi, eustacia)\nTenderised(suzi)\nGash(eustacia, nicholle)\nInfertile(eustacia)\nHush(eustacia, nicholle)\nHush(eustacia, shaylyn)\nDisinter(eustacia, shaylyn)\nforall x (Disinter(x, suzi) -> Uniformed(x))\nforall x (Tenderised(x) -> Uniformed(x))\nforall x (Hush(x, eustacia) -> Gash(x, nicholle))\nforall x (Gash(x, nicholle) and Tenderised(x) -> Disinter(nicholle, eustacia))\nforall x (Uniformed(x) -> Gash(x, suzi))\nforall x (Gash(x, shaylyn) and Hush(shaylyn, suzi) -> Disinter(x, suzi))\nforall x (Infertile(x) and Gash(x, nicholle) -> Tenderised(x))\nTenderised(nicholle) and Gash(nicholle, eustacia) -> Uniformed(nicholle)\n\nnot Uniformed(shaylyn)\n\nTenderised(shaylyn) and forall x (Tenderised(x) -> Uniformed(x)) -> therefore Uniformed(shaylyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The krystal podcast the griffith. The krystal is hesitating. The krystal consummate the andriette. The griffith is adaptive. The griffith is acrobatic. The griffith is sartorial. The griffith consummate the krystal. The griffith forbid the abagael. The andriette podcast the abagael. The andriette is sartorial. The abagael podcast the krystal. The abagael is hesitating. The abagael consummate the krystal. The abagael consummate the griffith. The abagael forbid the griffith. If someone forbid the andriette then they are ariose. All sartorial people are ariose. If someone consummate the abagael then they chase the krystal. If someone podcast the krystal and they are sartorial then the krystal forbid the abagael. If someone is ariose then they chase the andriette. If someone podcast the griffith and the griffith consummate the andriette then they need the andriette. If someone is hesitating and they chase the krystal then they are sartorial. If the krystal is sartorial and the krystal podcast the abagael then the krystal is ariose. The griffith podcast the andriette.", "logic": "\nPodcast(krystal, griffith)\nHesitating(krystal)\nConsummate(krystal, andriette)\nAdaptive(griffith)\nAcrobatic(griffith)\nSartorial(griffith)\nConsummate(griffith, krystal)\nForbid(griffith, abagael)\nPodcast(andriette, abagael)\nSartorial(andriette)\nPodcast(abagael, krystal)\nHesitating(abagael)\nConsummate(abagael, krystal)\nConsummate(abagael, griffith)\nForbid(abagael, griffith)\nforall x (Forbid(x, andriette) -> Ariose(x))\nforall x (Sartorial(x) -> Ariose(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x, abagael) -> Podcast(x, krystal))\nforall x (Podcast(x, krystal) and Sartorial(x) -> Forbid(krystal, abagael))\nforall x (Ariose(x) -> Podcast(x, andriette))\nforall x (Podcast(x, griffith) and Consummate(griffith, andriette) -> Forbid(x, andriette))\nforall x (Hesitating(x) and Podcast(x, krystal) -> Sartorial(x))\nSartorial(krystal) and Podcast(krystal, abagael) -> Ariose(krystal)\n\nPodcast(griffith, andriette)\n\nSartorial(griffith) and forall x (Sartorial(x) -> Ariose(x)) -> therefore Ariose(griffith) Ariose(griffith) and forall x (Ariose(x) -> Podcast(x, andriette)) -> therefore Podcast(griffith, andriette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The fiorenze tidy the bryna. The fiorenze is hindi. The fiorenze hibachi the rosalia. The bryna is disposed. The bryna is splayfoot. The bryna is scheduled. The bryna hibachi the fiorenze. The bryna fluoridize the lebbie. The rosalia tidy the lebbie. The rosalia is scheduled. The lebbie tidy the fiorenze. The lebbie is hindi. The lebbie hibachi the fiorenze. The lebbie hibachi the bryna. The lebbie fluoridize the bryna. If someone fluoridize the rosalia then they are public. All scheduled people are public. If someone hibachi the lebbie then they chase the fiorenze. If someone tidy the fiorenze and they are scheduled then the fiorenze fluoridize the lebbie. If someone is public then they chase the rosalia. If someone tidy the bryna and the bryna hibachi the rosalia then they need the rosalia. If someone is hindi and they chase the fiorenze then they are scheduled. If the fiorenze is scheduled and the fiorenze tidy the lebbie then the fiorenze is public. The lebbie is not public.", "logic": "\nTidy(fiorenze, bryna)\nHindi(fiorenze)\nHibachi(fiorenze, rosalia)\nDisposed(bryna)\nSplayfoot(bryna)\nScheduled(bryna)\nHibachi(bryna, fiorenze)\nFluoridize(bryna, lebbie)\nTidy(rosalia, lebbie)\nScheduled(rosalia)\nTidy(lebbie, fiorenze)\nHindi(lebbie)\nHibachi(lebbie, fiorenze)\nHibachi(lebbie, bryna)\nFluoridize(lebbie, bryna)\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, rosalia) -> Public(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Public(x))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, lebbie) -> Tidy(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Tidy(x, fiorenze) and Scheduled(x) -> Fluoridize(fiorenze, lebbie))\nforall x (Public(x) -> Tidy(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Tidy(x, bryna) and Hibachi(bryna, rosalia) -> Fluoridize(x, rosalia))\nforall x (Hindi(x) and Tidy(x, fiorenze) -> Scheduled(x))\nScheduled(fiorenze) and Tidy(fiorenze, lebbie) -> Public(fiorenze)\n\nnot Public(lebbie)\n\nHindi(lebbie) and Tidy(lebbie, fiorenze) and forall x (Hindi(x) and Tidy(x, fiorenze) -> Scheduled(x)) -> therefore Scheduled(lebbie) Scheduled(lebbie) and forall x (Scheduled(x) -> Public(x)) -> therefore Public(lebbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The hollis exorcise the cinda. The hollis is cavernous. The hollis vesture the marcus. The cinda is referable. The cinda is trihydroxy. The cinda is groundless. The cinda vesture the hollis. The cinda verbalize the cosetta. The marcus exorcise the cosetta. The marcus is groundless. The cosetta exorcise the hollis. The cosetta is cavernous. The cosetta vesture the hollis. The cosetta vesture the cinda. The cosetta verbalize the cinda. If someone verbalize the marcus then they are risque. All groundless people are risque. If someone vesture the cosetta then they chase the hollis. If someone exorcise the hollis and they are groundless then the hollis verbalize the cosetta. If someone is risque then they chase the marcus. If someone exorcise the cinda and the cinda vesture the marcus then they need the marcus. If someone is cavernous and they chase the hollis then they are groundless. If the hollis is groundless and the hollis exorcise the cosetta then the hollis is risque. The cosetta exorcise the marcus.", "logic": "\nExorcise(hollis, cinda)\nCavernous(hollis)\nVesture(hollis, marcus)\nReferable(cinda)\nTrihydroxy(cinda)\nGroundless(cinda)\nVesture(cinda, hollis)\nVerbalize(cinda, cosetta)\nExorcise(marcus, cosetta)\nGroundless(marcus)\nExorcise(cosetta, hollis)\nCavernous(cosetta)\nVesture(cosetta, hollis)\nVesture(cosetta, cinda)\nVerbalize(cosetta, cinda)\nforall x (Verbalize(x, marcus) -> Risque(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Risque(x))\nforall x (Vesture(x, cosetta) -> Exorcise(x, hollis))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, hollis) and Groundless(x) -> Verbalize(hollis, cosetta))\nforall x (Risque(x) -> Exorcise(x, marcus))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, cinda) and Vesture(cinda, marcus) -> Verbalize(x, marcus))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) and Exorcise(x, hollis) -> Groundless(x))\nGroundless(hollis) and Exorcise(hollis, cosetta) -> Risque(hollis)\n\nExorcise(cosetta, marcus)\n\nCavernous(cosetta) and Exorcise(cosetta, hollis) and forall x (Cavernous(x) and Exorcise(x, hollis) -> Groundless(x)) -> therefore Groundless(cosetta) Groundless(cosetta) and forall x (Groundless(x) -> Risque(x)) -> therefore Risque(cosetta) Risque(cosetta) and forall x (Risque(x) -> Exorcise(x, marcus)) -> therefore Exorcise(cosetta, marcus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The marilu droop the bengt. The marilu is nutritive. The marilu embitter the hermia. The bengt is somalian. The bengt is bantu. The bengt is stoppable. The bengt embitter the marilu. The bengt honeycomb the bartel. The hermia droop the bartel. The hermia is stoppable. The bartel droop the marilu. The bartel is nutritive. The bartel embitter the marilu. The bartel embitter the bengt. The bartel honeycomb the bengt. If someone honeycomb the hermia then they are blimpish. All stoppable people are blimpish. If someone embitter the bartel then they chase the marilu. If someone droop the marilu and they are stoppable then the marilu honeycomb the bartel. If someone is blimpish then they chase the hermia. If someone droop the bengt and the bengt embitter the hermia then they need the hermia. If someone is nutritive and they chase the marilu then they are stoppable. If the marilu is stoppable and the marilu droop the bartel then the marilu is blimpish. The bartel does not chase the hermia.", "logic": "\nDroop(marilu, bengt)\nNutritive(marilu)\nEmbitter(marilu, hermia)\nSomalian(bengt)\nBantu(bengt)\nStoppable(bengt)\nEmbitter(bengt, marilu)\nHoneycomb(bengt, bartel)\nDroop(hermia, bartel)\nStoppable(hermia)\nDroop(bartel, marilu)\nNutritive(bartel)\nEmbitter(bartel, marilu)\nEmbitter(bartel, bengt)\nHoneycomb(bartel, bengt)\nforall x (Honeycomb(x, hermia) -> Blimpish(x))\nforall x (Stoppable(x) -> Blimpish(x))\nforall x (Embitter(x, bartel) -> Droop(x, marilu))\nforall x (Droop(x, marilu) and Stoppable(x) -> Honeycomb(marilu, bartel))\nforall x (Blimpish(x) -> Droop(x, hermia))\nforall x (Droop(x, bengt) and Embitter(bengt, hermia) -> Honeycomb(x, hermia))\nforall x (Nutritive(x) and Droop(x, marilu) -> Stoppable(x))\nStoppable(marilu) and Droop(marilu, bartel) -> Blimpish(marilu)\n\nnot Droop(bartel, hermia)\n\nNutritive(bartel) and Droop(bartel, marilu) and forall x (Nutritive(x) and Droop(x, marilu) -> Stoppable(x)) -> therefore Stoppable(bartel) Stoppable(bartel) and forall x (Stoppable(x) -> Blimpish(x)) -> therefore Blimpish(bartel) Blimpish(bartel) and forall x (Blimpish(x) -> Droop(x, hermia)) -> therefore Droop(bartel, hermia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The michel scrag the waite. The michel is surmisable. The michel yearn the gustavo. The waite is imposed. The waite is relational. The waite is parvenu. The waite yearn the michel. The waite misguide the susi. The gustavo scrag the susi. The gustavo is parvenu. The susi scrag the michel. The susi is surmisable. The susi yearn the michel. The susi yearn the waite. The susi misguide the waite. If someone misguide the gustavo then they are gigantic. All parvenu people are gigantic. If someone yearn the susi then they chase the michel. If someone scrag the michel and they are parvenu then the michel misguide the susi. If someone is gigantic then they chase the gustavo. If someone scrag the waite and the waite yearn the gustavo then they need the gustavo. If someone is surmisable and they chase the michel then they are parvenu. If the michel is parvenu and the michel scrag the susi then the michel is gigantic. The waite does not need the gustavo.", "logic": "\nScrag(michel, waite)\nSurmisable(michel)\nYearn(michel, gustavo)\nImposed(waite)\nRelational(waite)\nParvenu(waite)\nYearn(waite, michel)\nMisguide(waite, susi)\nScrag(gustavo, susi)\nParvenu(gustavo)\nScrag(susi, michel)\nSurmisable(susi)\nYearn(susi, michel)\nYearn(susi, waite)\nMisguide(susi, waite)\nforall x (Misguide(x, gustavo) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Yearn(x, susi) -> Scrag(x, michel))\nforall x (Scrag(x, michel) and Parvenu(x) -> Misguide(michel, susi))\nforall x (Gigantic(x) -> Scrag(x, gustavo))\nforall x (Scrag(x, waite) and Yearn(waite, gustavo) -> Misguide(x, gustavo))\nforall x (Surmisable(x) and Scrag(x, michel) -> Parvenu(x))\nParvenu(michel) and Scrag(michel, susi) -> Gigantic(michel)\n\nnot Misguide(waite, gustavo)\n\nforall x (Scrag(x, waite) and Yearn(waite, gustavo) -> Misguide(x, gustavo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The renae aliment the rudyard. The renae is isoclinic. The renae champion the chester. The rudyard is unbeloved. The rudyard is schizoid. The rudyard is flavorsome. The rudyard champion the renae. The rudyard ostentate the tori. The chester aliment the tori. The chester is flavorsome. The tori aliment the renae. The tori is isoclinic. The tori champion the renae. The tori champion the rudyard. The tori ostentate the rudyard. If someone ostentate the chester then they are nasal. All flavorsome people are nasal. If someone champion the tori then they chase the renae. If someone aliment the renae and they are flavorsome then the renae ostentate the tori. If someone is nasal then they chase the chester. If someone aliment the rudyard and the rudyard champion the chester then they need the chester. If someone is isoclinic and they chase the renae then they are flavorsome. If the renae is flavorsome and the renae aliment the tori then the renae is nasal. The chester ostentate the chester.", "logic": "\nAliment(renae, rudyard)\nIsoclinic(renae)\nChampion(renae, chester)\nUnbeloved(rudyard)\nSchizoid(rudyard)\nFlavorsome(rudyard)\nChampion(rudyard, renae)\nOstentate(rudyard, tori)\nAliment(chester, tori)\nFlavorsome(chester)\nAliment(tori, renae)\nIsoclinic(tori)\nChampion(tori, renae)\nChampion(tori, rudyard)\nOstentate(tori, rudyard)\nforall x (Ostentate(x, chester) -> Nasal(x))\nforall x (Flavorsome(x) -> Nasal(x))\nforall x (Champion(x, tori) -> Aliment(x, renae))\nforall x (Aliment(x, renae) and Flavorsome(x) -> Ostentate(renae, tori))\nforall x (Nasal(x) -> Aliment(x, chester))\nforall x (Aliment(x, rudyard) and Champion(rudyard, chester) -> Ostentate(x, chester))\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) and Aliment(x, renae) -> Flavorsome(x))\nFlavorsome(renae) and Aliment(renae, tori) -> Nasal(renae)\n\nOstentate(chester, chester)\n\nforall x (Aliment(x, rudyard) and Champion(rudyard, chester) -> Ostentate(x, chester)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The lorena unloose the fulton. The lorena is corked. The lorena fuel the augie. The fulton is blond. The fulton is punitive. The fulton is obnoxious. The fulton fuel the lorena. The fulton make the corinna. The augie unloose the corinna. The augie is obnoxious. The corinna unloose the lorena. The corinna is corked. The corinna fuel the lorena. The corinna fuel the fulton. The corinna make the fulton. If someone make the augie then they are corymbose. All obnoxious people are corymbose. If someone fuel the corinna then they chase the lorena. If someone unloose the lorena and they are obnoxious then the lorena make the corinna. If someone is corymbose then they chase the augie. If someone unloose the fulton and the fulton fuel the augie then they need the augie. If someone is corked and they chase the lorena then they are obnoxious. If the lorena is obnoxious and the lorena unloose the corinna then the lorena is corymbose. The lorena is not obnoxious.", "logic": "\nUnloose(lorena, fulton)\nCorked(lorena)\nFuel(lorena, augie)\nBlond(fulton)\nPunitive(fulton)\nObnoxious(fulton)\nFuel(fulton, lorena)\nMake(fulton, corinna)\nUnloose(augie, corinna)\nObnoxious(augie)\nUnloose(corinna, lorena)\nCorked(corinna)\nFuel(corinna, lorena)\nFuel(corinna, fulton)\nMake(corinna, fulton)\nforall x (Make(x, augie) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) -> Corymbose(x))\nforall x (Fuel(x, corinna) -> Unloose(x, lorena))\nforall x (Unloose(x, lorena) and Obnoxious(x) -> Make(lorena, corinna))\nforall x (Corymbose(x) -> Unloose(x, augie))\nforall x (Unloose(x, fulton) and Fuel(fulton, augie) -> Make(x, augie))\nforall x (Corked(x) and Unloose(x, lorena) -> Obnoxious(x))\nObnoxious(lorena) and Unloose(lorena, corinna) -> Corymbose(lorena)\n\nnot Obnoxious(lorena)\n\nforall x (Corked(x) and Unloose(x, lorena) -> Obnoxious(x)) <- forall x (Fuel(x, corinna) -> Unloose(x, lorena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The gerhard downplay the mira. The gerhard is soiled. The gerhard demote the othilia. The mira is exchanged. The mira is unlearned. The mira is avionic. The mira demote the gerhard. The mira airfreight the sebastien. The othilia downplay the sebastien. The othilia is avionic. The sebastien downplay the gerhard. The sebastien is soiled. The sebastien demote the gerhard. The sebastien demote the mira. The sebastien airfreight the mira. If someone airfreight the othilia then they are lurid. All avionic people are lurid. If someone demote the sebastien then they chase the gerhard. If someone downplay the gerhard and they are avionic then the gerhard airfreight the sebastien. If someone is lurid then they chase the othilia. If someone downplay the mira and the mira demote the othilia then they need the othilia. If someone is soiled and they chase the gerhard then they are avionic. If the gerhard is avionic and the gerhard downplay the sebastien then the gerhard is lurid. The mira downplay the gerhard.", "logic": "\nDownplay(gerhard, mira)\nSoiled(gerhard)\nDemote(gerhard, othilia)\nExchanged(mira)\nUnlearned(mira)\nAvionic(mira)\nDemote(mira, gerhard)\nAirfreight(mira, sebastien)\nDownplay(othilia, sebastien)\nAvionic(othilia)\nDownplay(sebastien, gerhard)\nSoiled(sebastien)\nDemote(sebastien, gerhard)\nDemote(sebastien, mira)\nAirfreight(sebastien, mira)\nforall x (Airfreight(x, othilia) -> Lurid(x))\nforall x (Avionic(x) -> Lurid(x))\nforall x (Demote(x, sebastien) -> Downplay(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Downplay(x, gerhard) and Avionic(x) -> Airfreight(gerhard, sebastien))\nforall x (Lurid(x) -> Downplay(x, othilia))\nforall x (Downplay(x, mira) and Demote(mira, othilia) -> Airfreight(x, othilia))\nforall x (Soiled(x) and Downplay(x, gerhard) -> Avionic(x))\nAvionic(gerhard) and Downplay(gerhard, sebastien) -> Lurid(gerhard)\n\nDownplay(mira, gerhard)\n\nforall x (Demote(x, sebastien) -> Downplay(x, gerhard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The tomi captivate the berna. The tomi is diclinous. The tomi bodge the allina. The berna is urethral. The berna is capitular. The berna is yogic. The berna bodge the tomi. The berna publicize the ermina. The allina captivate the ermina. The allina is yogic. The ermina captivate the tomi. The ermina is diclinous. The ermina bodge the tomi. The ermina bodge the berna. The ermina publicize the berna. If someone publicize the allina then they are buddhistic. All yogic people are buddhistic. If someone bodge the ermina then they chase the tomi. If someone captivate the tomi and they are yogic then the tomi publicize the ermina. If someone is buddhistic then they chase the allina. If someone captivate the berna and the berna bodge the allina then they need the allina. If someone is diclinous and they chase the tomi then they are yogic. If the tomi is yogic and the tomi captivate the ermina then the tomi is buddhistic. The berna does not chase the ermina.", "logic": "\nCaptivate(tomi, berna)\nDiclinous(tomi)\nBodge(tomi, allina)\nUrethral(berna)\nCapitular(berna)\nYogic(berna)\nBodge(berna, tomi)\nPublicize(berna, ermina)\nCaptivate(allina, ermina)\nYogic(allina)\nCaptivate(ermina, tomi)\nDiclinous(ermina)\nBodge(ermina, tomi)\nBodge(ermina, berna)\nPublicize(ermina, berna)\nforall x (Publicize(x, allina) -> Buddhistic(x))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Buddhistic(x))\nforall x (Bodge(x, ermina) -> Captivate(x, tomi))\nforall x (Captivate(x, tomi) and Yogic(x) -> Publicize(tomi, ermina))\nforall x (Buddhistic(x) -> Captivate(x, allina))\nforall x (Captivate(x, berna) and Bodge(berna, allina) -> Publicize(x, allina))\nforall x (Diclinous(x) and Captivate(x, tomi) -> Yogic(x))\nYogic(tomi) and Captivate(tomi, ermina) -> Buddhistic(tomi)\n\nnot Captivate(berna, ermina)\n\nnot Captivate(berna, ermina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The warden navigate the easter. The warden is lapidarian. The warden baptise the shorty. The easter is live. The easter is missional. The easter is epidural. The easter baptise the warden. The easter indurate the almire. The shorty navigate the almire. The shorty is epidural. The almire navigate the warden. The almire is lapidarian. The almire baptise the warden. The almire baptise the easter. The almire indurate the easter. If someone indurate the shorty then they are anatomical. All epidural people are anatomical. If someone baptise the almire then they chase the warden. If someone navigate the warden and they are epidural then the warden indurate the almire. If someone is anatomical then they chase the shorty. If someone navigate the easter and the easter baptise the shorty then they need the shorty. If someone is lapidarian and they chase the warden then they are epidural. If the warden is epidural and the warden navigate the almire then the warden is anatomical. The shorty baptise the easter.", "logic": "\nNavigate(warden, easter)\nLapidarian(warden)\nBaptise(warden, shorty)\nLive(easter)\nMissional(easter)\nEpidural(easter)\nBaptise(easter, warden)\nIndurate(easter, almire)\nNavigate(shorty, almire)\nEpidural(shorty)\nNavigate(almire, warden)\nLapidarian(almire)\nBaptise(almire, warden)\nBaptise(almire, easter)\nIndurate(almire, easter)\nforall x (Indurate(x, shorty) -> Anatomical(x))\nforall x (Epidural(x) -> Anatomical(x))\nforall x (Baptise(x, almire) -> Navigate(x, warden))\nforall x (Navigate(x, warden) and Epidural(x) -> Indurate(warden, almire))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) -> Navigate(x, shorty))\nforall x (Navigate(x, easter) and Baptise(easter, shorty) -> Indurate(x, shorty))\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) and Navigate(x, warden) -> Epidural(x))\nEpidural(warden) and Navigate(warden, almire) -> Anatomical(warden)\n\nBaptise(shorty, easter)\n\nBaptise(shorty, easter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The tommi shock the billy. The tommi is majuscular. The tommi kayak the malynda. The billy is unforced. The billy is orthoptic. The billy is pharisaic. The billy kayak the tommi. The billy crenellate the wynn. The malynda shock the wynn. The malynda is pharisaic. The wynn shock the tommi. The wynn is majuscular. The wynn kayak the tommi. The wynn kayak the billy. The wynn crenellate the billy. If someone crenellate the malynda then they are ascendent. All pharisaic people are ascendent. If someone kayak the wynn then they chase the tommi. If someone shock the tommi and they are pharisaic then the tommi crenellate the wynn. If someone is ascendent then they chase the malynda. If someone shock the billy and the billy kayak the malynda then they need the malynda. If someone is majuscular and they chase the tommi then they are pharisaic. If the tommi is pharisaic and the tommi shock the wynn then the tommi is ascendent. The malynda is not majuscular.", "logic": "\nShock(tommi, billy)\nMajuscular(tommi)\nKayak(tommi, malynda)\nUnforced(billy)\nOrthoptic(billy)\nPharisaic(billy)\nKayak(billy, tommi)\nCrenellate(billy, wynn)\nShock(malynda, wynn)\nPharisaic(malynda)\nShock(wynn, tommi)\nMajuscular(wynn)\nKayak(wynn, tommi)\nKayak(wynn, billy)\nCrenellate(wynn, billy)\nforall x (Crenellate(x, malynda) -> Ascendent(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Ascendent(x))\nforall x (Kayak(x, wynn) -> Shock(x, tommi))\nforall x (Shock(x, tommi) and Pharisaic(x) -> Crenellate(tommi, wynn))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> Shock(x, malynda))\nforall x (Shock(x, billy) and Kayak(billy, malynda) -> Crenellate(x, malynda))\nforall x (Majuscular(x) and Shock(x, tommi) -> Pharisaic(x))\nPharisaic(tommi) and Shock(tommi, wynn) -> Ascendent(tommi)\n\nnot Majuscular(malynda)\n\nnot Majuscular(malynda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "The gunner okay the abby. The gunner is idle. The gunner winterize the ramsay. The abby is homoecious. The abby is leprous. The abby is isoclinal. The abby winterize the gunner. The abby assoil the rosemaria. The ramsay okay the rosemaria. The ramsay is isoclinal. The rosemaria okay the gunner. The rosemaria is idle. The rosemaria winterize the gunner. The rosemaria winterize the abby. The rosemaria assoil the abby. If someone assoil the ramsay then they are feckless. All isoclinal people are feckless. If someone winterize the rosemaria then they chase the gunner. If someone okay the gunner and they are isoclinal then the gunner assoil the rosemaria. If someone is feckless then they chase the ramsay. If someone okay the abby and the abby winterize the ramsay then they need the ramsay. If someone is idle and they chase the gunner then they are isoclinal. If the gunner is isoclinal and the gunner okay the rosemaria then the gunner is feckless. The rosemaria is homoecious.", "logic": "\nOkay(gunner, abby)\nIdle(gunner)\nWinterize(gunner, ramsay)\nHomoecious(abby)\nLeprous(abby)\nIsoclinal(abby)\nWinterize(abby, gunner)\nAssoil(abby, rosemaria)\nOkay(ramsay, rosemaria)\nIsoclinal(ramsay)\nOkay(rosemaria, gunner)\nIdle(rosemaria)\nWinterize(rosemaria, gunner)\nWinterize(rosemaria, abby)\nAssoil(rosemaria, abby)\nforall x (Assoil(x, ramsay) -> Feckless(x))\nforall x (Isoclinal(x) -> Feckless(x))\nforall x (Winterize(x, rosemaria) -> Okay(x, gunner))\nforall x (Okay(x, gunner) and Isoclinal(x) -> Assoil(gunner, rosemaria))\nforall x (Feckless(x) -> Okay(x, ramsay))\nforall x (Okay(x, abby) and Winterize(abby, ramsay) -> Assoil(x, ramsay))\nforall x (Idle(x) and Okay(x, gunner) -> Isoclinal(x))\nIsoclinal(gunner) and Okay(gunner, rosemaria) -> Feckless(gunner)\n\nHomoecious(rosemaria)\n\nHomoecious(rosemaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-48"} {"premises": "Jenifer is pleural. Jenifer is aggravated. Jenifer is pernicious. Jenifer is fertile. Rock is pleural. Rock is dorian. Rock is fertile. Rough people are pernicious. All antarctic, dorian people are indirect. Round, antarctic people are fertile. All pernicious people are aggravated. Round, aggravated people are dorian. If Jenifer is pernicious and Jenifer is aggravated then Jenifer is fertile. If Rock is aggravated then Rock is pleural. All pleural people are antarctic. Rock is dorian.", "logic": "\nPleural(jenifer)\nAggravated(jenifer)\nPernicious(jenifer)\nFertile(jenifer)\nPleural(rock)\nDorian(rock)\nFertile(rock)\nforall x (Indirect(x) -> Pernicious(x))\nforall x (Antarctic(x) and Dorian(x) -> Indirect(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Antarctic(x) -> Fertile(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) -> Aggravated(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Aggravated(x) -> Dorian(x))\nPernicious(jenifer) and Aggravated(jenifer) -> Fertile(jenifer)\nAggravated(rock) -> Pleural(rock)\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> Antarctic(x))\n\nDorian(rock)\n\ntherefore Dorian(rock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Keene is tubeless. Keene is xcvii. Keene is unbearable. Keene is sternal. Micky is tubeless. Micky is quick. Micky is sternal. Rough people are unbearable. All unprepared, quick people are chummy. Round, unprepared people are sternal. All unbearable people are xcvii. Round, xcvii people are quick. If Keene is unbearable and Keene is xcvii then Keene is sternal. If Micky is xcvii then Micky is tubeless. All tubeless people are unprepared. Micky is not tubeless.", "logic": "\nTubeless(keene)\nXcvii(keene)\nUnbearable(keene)\nSternal(keene)\nTubeless(micky)\nQuick(micky)\nSternal(micky)\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nforall x (Unprepared(x) and Quick(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Unbearable(x) and Unprepared(x) -> Sternal(x))\nforall x (Unbearable(x) -> Xcvii(x))\nforall x (Unbearable(x) and Xcvii(x) -> Quick(x))\nUnbearable(keene) and Xcvii(keene) -> Sternal(keene)\nXcvii(micky) -> Tubeless(micky)\nforall x (Tubeless(x) -> Unprepared(x))\n\nnot Tubeless(micky)\n\ntherefore Tubeless(micky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Danice is impassable. Danice is tousled. Danice is tonal. Danice is ambulatory. Florencia is impassable. Florencia is aboral. Florencia is ambulatory. Rough people are tonal. All spruce, aboral people are stone. Round, spruce people are ambulatory. All tonal people are tousled. Round, tousled people are aboral. If Danice is tonal and Danice is tousled then Danice is ambulatory. If Florencia is tousled then Florencia is impassable. All impassable people are spruce. Danice is spruce.", "logic": "\nImpassable(danice)\nTousled(danice)\nTonal(danice)\nAmbulatory(danice)\nImpassable(florencia)\nAboral(florencia)\nAmbulatory(florencia)\nforall x (Stone(x) -> Tonal(x))\nforall x (Spruce(x) and Aboral(x) -> Stone(x))\nforall x (Tonal(x) and Spruce(x) -> Ambulatory(x))\nforall x (Tonal(x) -> Tousled(x))\nforall x (Tonal(x) and Tousled(x) -> Aboral(x))\nTonal(danice) and Tousled(danice) -> Ambulatory(danice)\nTousled(florencia) -> Impassable(florencia)\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Spruce(x))\n\nSpruce(danice)\n\nImpassable(danice) and forall x (Impassable(x) -> Spruce(x)) -> therefore Spruce(danice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Sinclare is hypertonic. Sinclare is savoury. Sinclare is adored. Sinclare is ulcerative. Sapphire is hypertonic. Sapphire is stellate. Sapphire is ulcerative. Rough people are adored. All rigged, stellate people are burbly. Round, rigged people are ulcerative. All adored people are savoury. Round, savoury people are stellate. If Sinclare is adored and Sinclare is savoury then Sinclare is ulcerative. If Sapphire is savoury then Sapphire is hypertonic. All hypertonic people are rigged. Sinclare is not rigged.", "logic": "\nHypertonic(sinclare)\nSavoury(sinclare)\nAdored(sinclare)\nUlcerative(sinclare)\nHypertonic(sapphire)\nStellate(sapphire)\nUlcerative(sapphire)\nforall x (Burbly(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Rigged(x) and Stellate(x) -> Burbly(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Rigged(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) -> Savoury(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Savoury(x) -> Stellate(x))\nAdored(sinclare) and Savoury(sinclare) -> Ulcerative(sinclare)\nSavoury(sapphire) -> Hypertonic(sapphire)\nforall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Rigged(x))\n\nnot Rigged(sinclare)\n\nHypertonic(sinclare) and forall x (Hypertonic(x) -> Rigged(x)) -> therefore Rigged(sinclare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Alfonse is phobic. Alfonse is undefiled. Alfonse is extralegal. Alfonse is patented. Stefa is phobic. Stefa is zygotic. Stefa is patented. Rough people are extralegal. All whatever, zygotic people are levorotary. Round, whatever people are patented. All extralegal people are undefiled. Round, undefiled people are zygotic. If Alfonse is extralegal and Alfonse is undefiled then Alfonse is patented. If Stefa is undefiled then Stefa is phobic. All phobic people are whatever. Alfonse is levorotary.", "logic": "\nPhobic(alfonse)\nUndefiled(alfonse)\nExtralegal(alfonse)\nPatented(alfonse)\nPhobic(stefa)\nZygotic(stefa)\nPatented(stefa)\nforall x (Levorotary(x) -> Extralegal(x))\nforall x (Whatever(x) and Zygotic(x) -> Levorotary(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) and Whatever(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) -> Undefiled(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) and Undefiled(x) -> Zygotic(x))\nExtralegal(alfonse) and Undefiled(alfonse) -> Patented(alfonse)\nUndefiled(stefa) -> Phobic(stefa)\nforall x (Phobic(x) -> Whatever(x))\n\nLevorotary(alfonse)\n\nPhobic(alfonse) and forall x (Phobic(x) -> Whatever(x)) -> therefore Whatever(alfonse) Extralegal(alfonse) and Undefiled(alfonse) and forall x (Extralegal(x) and Undefiled(x) -> Zygotic(x)) -> therefore Zygotic(alfonse) Whatever(alfonse) and Zygotic(alfonse) and forall x (Whatever(x) and Zygotic(x) -> Levorotary(x)) -> therefore Levorotary(alfonse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Elka is polar. Elka is protracted. Elka is atoxic. Elka is grassroots. Ivette is polar. Ivette is capitular. Ivette is grassroots. Rough people are atoxic. All acanthoid, capitular people are bicolored. Round, acanthoid people are grassroots. All atoxic people are protracted. Round, protracted people are capitular. If Elka is atoxic and Elka is protracted then Elka is grassroots. If Ivette is protracted then Ivette is polar. All polar people are acanthoid. Elka is not bicolored.", "logic": "\nPolar(elka)\nProtracted(elka)\nAtoxic(elka)\nGrassroots(elka)\nPolar(ivette)\nCapitular(ivette)\nGrassroots(ivette)\nforall x (Bicolored(x) -> Atoxic(x))\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) and Capitular(x) -> Bicolored(x))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) and Acanthoid(x) -> Grassroots(x))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Protracted(x))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) and Protracted(x) -> Capitular(x))\nAtoxic(elka) and Protracted(elka) -> Grassroots(elka)\nProtracted(ivette) -> Polar(ivette)\nforall x (Polar(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\n\nnot Bicolored(elka)\n\nPolar(elka) and forall x (Polar(x) -> Acanthoid(x)) -> therefore Acanthoid(elka) Atoxic(elka) and Protracted(elka) and forall x (Atoxic(x) and Protracted(x) -> Capitular(x)) -> therefore Capitular(elka) Acanthoid(elka) and Capitular(elka) and forall x (Acanthoid(x) and Capitular(x) -> Bicolored(x)) -> therefore Bicolored(elka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Lorianna is isomorphic. Lorianna is honduran. Lorianna is ergotic. Lorianna is sleepless. Lucina is isomorphic. Lucina is sovereign. Lucina is sleepless. Rough people are ergotic. All avuncular, sovereign people are anuran. Round, avuncular people are sleepless. All ergotic people are honduran. Round, honduran people are sovereign. If Lorianna is ergotic and Lorianna is honduran then Lorianna is sleepless. If Lucina is honduran then Lucina is isomorphic. All isomorphic people are avuncular. Lucina is ergotic.", "logic": "\nIsomorphic(lorianna)\nHonduran(lorianna)\nErgotic(lorianna)\nSleepless(lorianna)\nIsomorphic(lucina)\nSovereign(lucina)\nSleepless(lucina)\nforall x (Anuran(x) -> Ergotic(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and Sovereign(x) -> Anuran(x))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) and Avuncular(x) -> Sleepless(x))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) -> Honduran(x))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) and Honduran(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nErgotic(lorianna) and Honduran(lorianna) -> Sleepless(lorianna)\nHonduran(lucina) -> Isomorphic(lucina)\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Avuncular(x))\n\nErgotic(lucina)\n\nIsomorphic(lucina) and forall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Avuncular(x)) -> therefore Avuncular(lucina) Avuncular(lucina) and Sovereign(lucina) and forall x (Avuncular(x) and Sovereign(x) -> Anuran(x)) -> therefore Anuran(lucina) Anuran(lucina) and forall x (Anuran(x) -> Ergotic(x)) -> therefore Ergotic(lucina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "Jose is closed. Jose is theistic. Jose is unsubdued. Jose is forfeited. Lorenza is closed. Lorenza is french. Lorenza is forfeited. Rough people are unsubdued. All wintry, french people are etched. Round, wintry people are forfeited. All unsubdued people are theistic. Round, theistic people are french. If Jose is unsubdued and Jose is theistic then Jose is forfeited. If Lorenza is theistic then Lorenza is closed. All closed people are wintry. Lorenza is not unsubdued.", "logic": "\nClosed(jose)\nTheistic(jose)\nUnsubdued(jose)\nForfeited(jose)\nClosed(lorenza)\nFrench(lorenza)\nForfeited(lorenza)\nforall x (Etched(x) -> Unsubdued(x))\nforall x (Wintry(x) and French(x) -> Etched(x))\nforall x (Unsubdued(x) and Wintry(x) -> Forfeited(x))\nforall x (Unsubdued(x) -> Theistic(x))\nforall x (Unsubdued(x) and Theistic(x) -> French(x))\nUnsubdued(jose) and Theistic(jose) -> Forfeited(jose)\nTheistic(lorenza) -> Closed(lorenza)\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Wintry(x))\n\nnot Unsubdued(lorenza)\n\nClosed(lorenza) and forall x (Closed(x) -> Wintry(x)) -> therefore Wintry(lorenza) Wintry(lorenza) and French(lorenza) and forall x (Wintry(x) and French(x) -> Etched(x)) -> therefore Etched(lorenza) Etched(lorenza) and forall x (Etched(x) -> Unsubdued(x)) -> therefore Unsubdued(lorenza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-765"} {"premises": "The ash turtle the sidney. The sidney accoutre the ash. The nicole drool the ash. If something is textbook then it is bubonic. If something is slashed then it accoutre the nicole. If something accoutre the ash then it drool the nicole. If the sidney is slashed then the sidney drool the nicole. If something accoutre the ash then it turtle the sidney. If something drool the nicole then the nicole accoutre the sidney. If something drool the ash and the ash drool the nicole then the ash accoutre the nicole. If something accoutre the sidney then the sidney is slashed. The sidney accoutre the ash.", "logic": "\nTurtle(ash, sidney)\nAccoutre(sidney, ash)\nDrool(nicole, ash)\nforall x (Textbook(x) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Accoutre(x, nicole))\nforall x (Accoutre(x, ash) -> Drool(x, nicole))\nSlashed(sidney) -> Drool(sidney, nicole)\nforall x (Accoutre(x, ash) -> Turtle(x, sidney))\nforall x (Drool(x, nicole) -> Accoutre(nicole, sidney))\nforall x (Drool(x, ash) and Drool(ash, nicole) -> Accoutre(ash, nicole))\nforall x (Accoutre(x, sidney) -> Slashed(sidney))\n\nAccoutre(sidney, ash)\n\ntherefore Accoutre(sidney, ash)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The karleen transude the hilde. The hilde impart the karleen. The malinda accentuate the karleen. If something is sleazy then it is stripy. If something is tamed then it impart the malinda. If something impart the karleen then it accentuate the malinda. If the hilde is tamed then the hilde accentuate the malinda. If something impart the karleen then it transude the hilde. If something accentuate the malinda then the malinda impart the hilde. If something accentuate the karleen and the karleen accentuate the malinda then the karleen impart the malinda. If something impart the hilde then the hilde is tamed. The karleen does not eat the hilde.", "logic": "\nTransude(karleen, hilde)\nImpart(hilde, karleen)\nAccentuate(malinda, karleen)\nforall x (Sleazy(x) -> Stripy(x))\nforall x (Tamed(x) -> Impart(x, malinda))\nforall x (Impart(x, karleen) -> Accentuate(x, malinda))\nTamed(hilde) -> Accentuate(hilde, malinda)\nforall x (Impart(x, karleen) -> Transude(x, hilde))\nforall x (Accentuate(x, malinda) -> Impart(malinda, hilde))\nforall x (Accentuate(x, karleen) and Accentuate(karleen, malinda) -> Impart(karleen, malinda))\nforall x (Impart(x, hilde) -> Tamed(hilde))\n\nnot Transude(karleen, hilde)\n\ntherefore Transude(karleen, hilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The simona tone the salomo. The salomo rebury the simona. The roslyn beset the simona. If something is stopped then it is immunised. If something is comic then it rebury the roslyn. If something rebury the simona then it beset the roslyn. If the salomo is comic then the salomo beset the roslyn. If something rebury the simona then it tone the salomo. If something beset the roslyn then the roslyn rebury the salomo. If something beset the simona and the simona beset the roslyn then the simona rebury the roslyn. If something rebury the salomo then the salomo is comic. The salomo tone the salomo.", "logic": "\nTone(simona, salomo)\nRebury(salomo, simona)\nBeset(roslyn, simona)\nforall x (Stopped(x) -> Immunised(x))\nforall x (Comic(x) -> Rebury(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Rebury(x, simona) -> Beset(x, roslyn))\nComic(salomo) -> Beset(salomo, roslyn)\nforall x (Rebury(x, simona) -> Tone(x, salomo))\nforall x (Beset(x, roslyn) -> Rebury(roslyn, salomo))\nforall x (Beset(x, simona) and Beset(simona, roslyn) -> Rebury(simona, roslyn))\nforall x (Rebury(x, salomo) -> Comic(salomo))\n\nTone(salomo, salomo)\n\nRebury(salomo, simona) and forall x (Rebury(x, simona) -> Tone(x, salomo)) -> therefore Tone(salomo, salomo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The harriett shew the mikel. The mikel tell the harriett. The marry implicate the harriett. If something is stricken then it is bellbottom. If something is subject then it tell the marry. If something tell the harriett then it implicate the marry. If the mikel is subject then the mikel implicate the marry. If something tell the harriett then it shew the mikel. If something implicate the marry then the marry tell the mikel. If something implicate the harriett and the harriett implicate the marry then the harriett tell the marry. If something tell the mikel then the mikel is subject. The mikel does not eat the mikel.", "logic": "\nShew(harriett, mikel)\nTell(mikel, harriett)\nImplicate(marry, harriett)\nforall x (Stricken(x) -> Bellbottom(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) -> Tell(x, marry))\nforall x (Tell(x, harriett) -> Implicate(x, marry))\nSubject(mikel) -> Implicate(mikel, marry)\nforall x (Tell(x, harriett) -> Shew(x, mikel))\nforall x (Implicate(x, marry) -> Tell(marry, mikel))\nforall x (Implicate(x, harriett) and Implicate(harriett, marry) -> Tell(harriett, marry))\nforall x (Tell(x, mikel) -> Subject(mikel))\n\nnot Shew(mikel, mikel)\n\nTell(mikel, harriett) and forall x (Tell(x, harriett) -> Shew(x, mikel)) -> therefore Shew(mikel, mikel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The pamela denature the thorpe. The thorpe summer the pamela. The leiah buoy the pamela. If something is corded then it is sleety. If something is unseen then it summer the leiah. If something summer the pamela then it buoy the leiah. If the thorpe is unseen then the thorpe buoy the leiah. If something summer the pamela then it denature the thorpe. If something buoy the leiah then the leiah summer the thorpe. If something buoy the pamela and the pamela buoy the leiah then the pamela summer the leiah. If something summer the thorpe then the thorpe is unseen. The leiah summer the thorpe.", "logic": "\nDenature(pamela, thorpe)\nSummer(thorpe, pamela)\nBuoy(leiah, pamela)\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Sleety(x))\nforall x (Unseen(x) -> Summer(x, leiah))\nforall x (Summer(x, pamela) -> Buoy(x, leiah))\nUnseen(thorpe) -> Buoy(thorpe, leiah)\nforall x (Summer(x, pamela) -> Denature(x, thorpe))\nforall x (Buoy(x, leiah) -> Summer(leiah, thorpe))\nforall x (Buoy(x, pamela) and Buoy(pamela, leiah) -> Summer(pamela, leiah))\nforall x (Summer(x, thorpe) -> Unseen(thorpe))\n\nSummer(leiah, thorpe)\n\nSummer(thorpe, pamela) and forall x (Summer(x, pamela) -> Buoy(x, leiah)) -> therefore Buoy(thorpe, leiah) Buoy(thorpe, leiah) and forall x (Buoy(x, leiah) -> Summer(leiah, thorpe)) -> therefore Summer(leiah, thorpe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The nannie acquaint the carmen. The carmen wince the nannie. The chet virilize the nannie. If something is cosmic then it is unpleasant. If something is open then it wince the chet. If something wince the nannie then it virilize the chet. If the carmen is open then the carmen virilize the chet. If something wince the nannie then it acquaint the carmen. If something virilize the chet then the chet wince the carmen. If something virilize the nannie and the nannie virilize the chet then the nannie wince the chet. If something wince the carmen then the carmen is open. The chet does not like the carmen.", "logic": "\nAcquaint(nannie, carmen)\nWince(carmen, nannie)\nVirilize(chet, nannie)\nforall x (Cosmic(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\nforall x (Open(x) -> Wince(x, chet))\nforall x (Wince(x, nannie) -> Virilize(x, chet))\nOpen(carmen) -> Virilize(carmen, chet)\nforall x (Wince(x, nannie) -> Acquaint(x, carmen))\nforall x (Virilize(x, chet) -> Wince(chet, carmen))\nforall x (Virilize(x, nannie) and Virilize(nannie, chet) -> Wince(nannie, chet))\nforall x (Wince(x, carmen) -> Open(carmen))\n\nnot Wince(chet, carmen)\n\nWince(carmen, nannie) and forall x (Wince(x, nannie) -> Virilize(x, chet)) -> therefore Virilize(carmen, chet) Virilize(carmen, chet) and forall x (Virilize(x, chet) -> Wince(chet, carmen)) -> therefore Wince(chet, carmen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The philis maraud the berrie. The berrie ripen the philis. The florella ordinate the philis. If something is unitarian then it is astonished. If something is inlaid then it ripen the florella. If something ripen the philis then it ordinate the florella. If the berrie is inlaid then the berrie ordinate the florella. If something ripen the philis then it maraud the berrie. If something ordinate the florella then the florella ripen the berrie. If something ordinate the philis and the philis ordinate the florella then the philis ripen the florella. If something ripen the berrie then the berrie is inlaid. The berrie is inlaid.", "logic": "\nMaraud(philis, berrie)\nRipen(berrie, philis)\nOrdinate(florella, philis)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Astonished(x))\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Ripen(x, florella))\nforall x (Ripen(x, philis) -> Ordinate(x, florella))\nInlaid(berrie) -> Ordinate(berrie, florella)\nforall x (Ripen(x, philis) -> Maraud(x, berrie))\nforall x (Ordinate(x, florella) -> Ripen(florella, berrie))\nforall x (Ordinate(x, philis) and Ordinate(philis, florella) -> Ripen(philis, florella))\nforall x (Ripen(x, berrie) -> Inlaid(berrie))\n\nInlaid(berrie)\n\nRipen(berrie, philis) and forall x (Ripen(x, philis) -> Ordinate(x, florella)) -> therefore Ordinate(berrie, florella) Ordinate(berrie, florella) and forall x (Ordinate(x, florella) -> Ripen(florella, berrie)) -> therefore Ripen(florella, berrie) Ripen(florella, berrie) and forall x (Ripen(x, berrie) -> Inlaid(berrie)) -> therefore Inlaid(berrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The tamma eagle the horst. The horst boom the tamma. The tomas evolve the tamma. If something is genealogic then it is ennobling. If something is ergotic then it boom the tomas. If something boom the tamma then it evolve the tomas. If the horst is ergotic then the horst evolve the tomas. If something boom the tamma then it eagle the horst. If something evolve the tomas then the tomas boom the horst. If something evolve the tamma and the tamma evolve the tomas then the tamma boom the tomas. If something boom the horst then the horst is ergotic. The horst is not ergotic.", "logic": "\nEagle(tamma, horst)\nBoom(horst, tamma)\nEvolve(tomas, tamma)\nforall x (Genealogic(x) -> Ennobling(x))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) -> Boom(x, tomas))\nforall x (Boom(x, tamma) -> Evolve(x, tomas))\nErgotic(horst) -> Evolve(horst, tomas)\nforall x (Boom(x, tamma) -> Eagle(x, horst))\nforall x (Evolve(x, tomas) -> Boom(tomas, horst))\nforall x (Evolve(x, tamma) and Evolve(tamma, tomas) -> Boom(tamma, tomas))\nforall x (Boom(x, horst) -> Ergotic(horst))\n\nnot Ergotic(horst)\n\nBoom(horst, tamma) and forall x (Boom(x, tamma) -> Evolve(x, tomas)) -> therefore Evolve(horst, tomas) Evolve(horst, tomas) and forall x (Evolve(x, tomas) -> Boom(tomas, horst)) -> therefore Boom(tomas, horst) Boom(tomas, horst) and forall x (Boom(x, horst) -> Ergotic(horst)) -> therefore Ergotic(horst)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The huey hollo the kenneth. The kenneth incur the huey. The shaughn whish the huey. If something is relieved then it is onymous. If something is utilized then it incur the shaughn. If something incur the huey then it whish the shaughn. If the kenneth is utilized then the kenneth whish the shaughn. If something incur the huey then it hollo the kenneth. If something whish the shaughn then the shaughn incur the kenneth. If something whish the huey and the huey whish the shaughn then the huey incur the shaughn. If something incur the kenneth then the kenneth is utilized. The huey does not like the shaughn.", "logic": "\nHollo(huey, kenneth)\nIncur(kenneth, huey)\nWhish(shaughn, huey)\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) -> Incur(x, shaughn))\nforall x (Incur(x, huey) -> Whish(x, shaughn))\nUtilized(kenneth) -> Whish(kenneth, shaughn)\nforall x (Incur(x, huey) -> Hollo(x, kenneth))\nforall x (Whish(x, shaughn) -> Incur(shaughn, kenneth))\nforall x (Whish(x, huey) and Whish(huey, shaughn) -> Incur(huey, shaughn))\nforall x (Incur(x, kenneth) -> Utilized(kenneth))\n\nnot Incur(huey, shaughn)\n\nforall x (Whish(x, huey) and Whish(huey, shaughn) -> Incur(huey, shaughn)) <- forall x (Incur(x, huey) -> Whish(x, shaughn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The celinka traipse the happy. The happy outmarch the celinka. The vivyan overdose the celinka. If something is biographic then it is shakeable. If something is wilted then it outmarch the vivyan. If something outmarch the celinka then it overdose the vivyan. If the happy is wilted then the happy overdose the vivyan. If something outmarch the celinka then it traipse the happy. If something overdose the vivyan then the vivyan outmarch the happy. If something overdose the celinka and the celinka overdose the vivyan then the celinka outmarch the vivyan. If something outmarch the happy then the happy is wilted. The vivyan traipse the happy.", "logic": "\nTraipse(celinka, happy)\nOutmarch(happy, celinka)\nOverdose(vivyan, celinka)\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Shakeable(x))\nforall x (Wilted(x) -> Outmarch(x, vivyan))\nforall x (Outmarch(x, celinka) -> Overdose(x, vivyan))\nWilted(happy) -> Overdose(happy, vivyan)\nforall x (Outmarch(x, celinka) -> Traipse(x, happy))\nforall x (Overdose(x, vivyan) -> Outmarch(vivyan, happy))\nforall x (Overdose(x, celinka) and Overdose(celinka, vivyan) -> Outmarch(celinka, vivyan))\nforall x (Outmarch(x, happy) -> Wilted(happy))\n\nTraipse(vivyan, happy)\n\nforall x (Outmarch(x, celinka) -> Traipse(x, happy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The glori lactate the caralie. The caralie assay the glori. The oralie hoodwink the glori. If something is autotelic then it is bush. If something is collegial then it assay the oralie. If something assay the glori then it hoodwink the oralie. If the caralie is collegial then the caralie hoodwink the oralie. If something assay the glori then it lactate the caralie. If something hoodwink the oralie then the oralie assay the caralie. If something hoodwink the glori and the glori hoodwink the oralie then the glori assay the oralie. If something assay the caralie then the caralie is collegial. The oralie does not see the oralie.", "logic": "\nLactate(glori, caralie)\nAssay(caralie, glori)\nHoodwink(oralie, glori)\nforall x (Autotelic(x) -> Bush(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Assay(x, oralie))\nforall x (Assay(x, glori) -> Hoodwink(x, oralie))\nCollegial(caralie) -> Hoodwink(caralie, oralie)\nforall x (Assay(x, glori) -> Lactate(x, caralie))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, oralie) -> Assay(oralie, caralie))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, glori) and Hoodwink(glori, oralie) -> Assay(glori, oralie))\nforall x (Assay(x, caralie) -> Collegial(caralie))\n\nnot Hoodwink(oralie, oralie)\n\nforall x (Assay(x, glori) -> Hoodwink(x, oralie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The betti distort the larine. The larine keen the betti. The mindy birdlime the betti. If something is generative then it is togolese. If something is fashioned then it keen the mindy. If something keen the betti then it birdlime the mindy. If the larine is fashioned then the larine birdlime the mindy. If something keen the betti then it distort the larine. If something birdlime the mindy then the mindy keen the larine. If something birdlime the betti and the betti birdlime the mindy then the betti keen the mindy. If something keen the larine then the larine is fashioned. The mindy keen the mindy.", "logic": "\nDistort(betti, larine)\nKeen(larine, betti)\nBirdlime(mindy, betti)\nforall x (Generative(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Fashioned(x) -> Keen(x, mindy))\nforall x (Keen(x, betti) -> Birdlime(x, mindy))\nFashioned(larine) -> Birdlime(larine, mindy)\nforall x (Keen(x, betti) -> Distort(x, larine))\nforall x (Birdlime(x, mindy) -> Keen(mindy, larine))\nforall x (Birdlime(x, betti) and Birdlime(betti, mindy) -> Keen(betti, mindy))\nforall x (Keen(x, larine) -> Fashioned(larine))\n\nKeen(mindy, mindy)\n\nforall x (Fashioned(x) -> Keen(x, mindy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The lenora display the martyn. The martyn galvanize the lenora. The kirsteni qualify the lenora. If something is unspoiled then it is male. If something is bryophytic then it galvanize the kirsteni. If something galvanize the lenora then it qualify the kirsteni. If the martyn is bryophytic then the martyn qualify the kirsteni. If something galvanize the lenora then it display the martyn. If something qualify the kirsteni then the kirsteni galvanize the martyn. If something qualify the lenora and the lenora qualify the kirsteni then the lenora galvanize the kirsteni. If something galvanize the martyn then the martyn is bryophytic. The martyn does not eat the lenora.", "logic": "\nDisplay(lenora, martyn)\nGalvanize(martyn, lenora)\nQualify(kirsteni, lenora)\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) -> Male(x))\nforall x (Bryophytic(x) -> Galvanize(x, kirsteni))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, lenora) -> Qualify(x, kirsteni))\nBryophytic(martyn) -> Qualify(martyn, kirsteni)\nforall x (Galvanize(x, lenora) -> Display(x, martyn))\nforall x (Qualify(x, kirsteni) -> Galvanize(kirsteni, martyn))\nforall x (Qualify(x, lenora) and Qualify(lenora, kirsteni) -> Galvanize(lenora, kirsteni))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, martyn) -> Bryophytic(martyn))\n\nnot Display(martyn, lenora)\n\nnot Display(martyn, lenora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The pete splay the cherin. The cherin stack the pete. The osbourn skydive the pete. If something is colloidal then it is unreal. If something is anorthic then it stack the osbourn. If something stack the pete then it skydive the osbourn. If the cherin is anorthic then the cherin skydive the osbourn. If something stack the pete then it splay the cherin. If something skydive the osbourn then the osbourn stack the cherin. If something skydive the pete and the pete skydive the osbourn then the pete stack the osbourn. If something stack the cherin then the cherin is anorthic. The cherin stack the cherin.", "logic": "\nSplay(pete, cherin)\nStack(cherin, pete)\nSkydive(osbourn, pete)\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Unreal(x))\nforall x (Anorthic(x) -> Stack(x, osbourn))\nforall x (Stack(x, pete) -> Skydive(x, osbourn))\nAnorthic(cherin) -> Skydive(cherin, osbourn)\nforall x (Stack(x, pete) -> Splay(x, cherin))\nforall x (Skydive(x, osbourn) -> Stack(osbourn, cherin))\nforall x (Skydive(x, pete) and Skydive(pete, osbourn) -> Stack(pete, osbourn))\nforall x (Stack(x, cherin) -> Anorthic(cherin))\n\nStack(cherin, cherin)\n\nStack(cherin, cherin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The monte exorcize the katerine. The katerine beshrew the monte. The christine trawl the monte. If something is narrative then it is precatory. If something is earthbound then it beshrew the christine. If something beshrew the monte then it trawl the christine. If the katerine is earthbound then the katerine trawl the christine. If something beshrew the monte then it exorcize the katerine. If something trawl the christine then the christine beshrew the katerine. If something trawl the monte and the monte trawl the christine then the monte beshrew the christine. If something beshrew the katerine then the katerine is earthbound. The christine is not blue.", "logic": "\nExorcize(monte, katerine)\nBeshrew(katerine, monte)\nTrawl(christine, monte)\nforall x (Narrative(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) -> Beshrew(x, christine))\nforall x (Beshrew(x, monte) -> Trawl(x, christine))\nEarthbound(katerine) -> Trawl(katerine, christine)\nforall x (Beshrew(x, monte) -> Exorcize(x, katerine))\nforall x (Trawl(x, christine) -> Beshrew(christine, katerine))\nforall x (Trawl(x, monte) and Trawl(monte, christine) -> Beshrew(monte, christine))\nforall x (Beshrew(x, katerine) -> Earthbound(katerine))\n\nnot Blue(christine)\n\nnot Blue(christine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "The nada huckster the riki. The riki shut the nada. The gideon tariff the nada. If something is feasible then it is diploid. If something is tame then it shut the gideon. If something shut the nada then it tariff the gideon. If the riki is tame then the riki tariff the gideon. If something shut the nada then it huckster the riki. If something tariff the gideon then the gideon shut the riki. If something tariff the nada and the nada tariff the gideon then the nada shut the gideon. If something shut the riki then the riki is tame. The nada huckster the gideon.", "logic": "\nHuckster(nada, riki)\nShut(riki, nada)\nTariff(gideon, nada)\nforall x (Feasible(x) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Shut(x, gideon))\nforall x (Shut(x, nada) -> Tariff(x, gideon))\nTame(riki) -> Tariff(riki, gideon)\nforall x (Shut(x, nada) -> Huckster(x, riki))\nforall x (Tariff(x, gideon) -> Shut(gideon, riki))\nforall x (Tariff(x, nada) and Tariff(nada, gideon) -> Shut(nada, gideon))\nforall x (Shut(x, riki) -> Tame(riki))\n\nHuckster(nada, gideon)\n\nHuckster(nada, gideon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-825"} {"premises": "Alexandra is monistic. Jannelle is not areolate. If something is amoeban and not areolate then it is not monistic. All immanent, gargantuan things are monistic. If Alexandra is midmost then Alexandra is not reedlike. Smart, gargantuan things are immanent. Smart things are amoeban. All amoeban things are gargantuan. Jannelle is not areolate.", "logic": "\nMonistic(alexandra)\nnot Areolate(jannelle)\nforall x (Amoeban(x) and not Areolate(x) -> not Monistic(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) and Gargantuan(x) -> Monistic(x))\nMidmost(alexandra) -> not Reedlike(alexandra)\nforall x (Monistic(x) and Gargantuan(x) -> Immanent(x))\nforall x (Monistic(x) -> Amoeban(x))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) -> Gargantuan(x))\n\nnot Areolate(jannelle)\n\ntherefore not Areolate(jannelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Liora is furred. Dalia is not cachectic. If something is unaccented and not cachectic then it is not furred. All attendant, lactogenic things are furred. If Liora is unvaned then Liora is not cogent. Smart, lactogenic things are attendant. Smart things are unaccented. All unaccented things are lactogenic. Liora is not furred.", "logic": "\nFurred(liora)\nnot Cachectic(dalia)\nforall x (Unaccented(x) and not Cachectic(x) -> not Furred(x))\nforall x (Attendant(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Furred(x))\nUnvaned(liora) -> not Cogent(liora)\nforall x (Furred(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Attendant(x))\nforall x (Furred(x) -> Unaccented(x))\nforall x (Unaccented(x) -> Lactogenic(x))\n\nnot Furred(liora)\n\ntherefore Furred(liora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Bruno is lacrimal. Shanta is not postal. If something is unguarded and not postal then it is not lacrimal. All rigid, downward things are lacrimal. If Bruno is psychic then Bruno is not managerial. Smart, downward things are rigid. Smart things are unguarded. All unguarded things are downward. Bruno is unguarded.", "logic": "\nLacrimal(bruno)\nnot Postal(shanta)\nforall x (Unguarded(x) and not Postal(x) -> not Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Rigid(x) and Downward(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\nPsychic(bruno) -> not Managerial(bruno)\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Downward(x) -> Rigid(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Unguarded(x))\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Downward(x))\n\nUnguarded(bruno)\n\nLacrimal(bruno) and forall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Unguarded(x)) -> therefore Unguarded(bruno)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Ellwood is lanky. Nelle is not telephonic. If something is cosmologic and not telephonic then it is not lanky. All affixed, haemic things are lanky. If Ellwood is expressive then Ellwood is not ruddy. Smart, haemic things are affixed. Smart things are cosmologic. All cosmologic things are haemic. Ellwood is not cosmologic.", "logic": "\nLanky(ellwood)\nnot Telephonic(nelle)\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) and not Telephonic(x) -> not Lanky(x))\nforall x (Affixed(x) and Haemic(x) -> Lanky(x))\nExpressive(ellwood) -> not Ruddy(ellwood)\nforall x (Lanky(x) and Haemic(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Lanky(x) -> Cosmologic(x))\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Haemic(x))\n\nnot Cosmologic(ellwood)\n\nLanky(ellwood) and forall x (Lanky(x) -> Cosmologic(x)) -> therefore Cosmologic(ellwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Patric is bimanual. Xenia is not liable. If something is frangible and not liable then it is not bimanual. All acapnial, flexible things are bimanual. If Patric is detached then Patric is not loose. Smart, flexible things are acapnial. Smart things are frangible. All frangible things are flexible. Patric is flexible.", "logic": "\nBimanual(patric)\nnot Liable(xenia)\nforall x (Frangible(x) and not Liable(x) -> not Bimanual(x))\nforall x (Acapnial(x) and Flexible(x) -> Bimanual(x))\nDetached(patric) -> not Loose(patric)\nforall x (Bimanual(x) and Flexible(x) -> Acapnial(x))\nforall x (Bimanual(x) -> Frangible(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Flexible(x))\n\nFlexible(patric)\n\nBimanual(patric) and forall x (Bimanual(x) -> Frangible(x)) -> therefore Frangible(patric) Frangible(patric) and forall x (Frangible(x) -> Flexible(x)) -> therefore Flexible(patric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Laurella is gnarled. Nevile is not costless. If something is unsmoothed and not costless then it is not gnarled. All untidy, pestilent things are gnarled. If Laurella is irenic then Laurella is not zygotic. Smart, pestilent things are untidy. Smart things are unsmoothed. All unsmoothed things are pestilent. Laurella is not pestilent.", "logic": "\nGnarled(laurella)\nnot Costless(nevile)\nforall x (Unsmoothed(x) and not Costless(x) -> not Gnarled(x))\nforall x (Untidy(x) and Pestilent(x) -> Gnarled(x))\nIrenic(laurella) -> not Zygotic(laurella)\nforall x (Gnarled(x) and Pestilent(x) -> Untidy(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) -> Unsmoothed(x))\nforall x (Unsmoothed(x) -> Pestilent(x))\n\nnot Pestilent(laurella)\n\nGnarled(laurella) and forall x (Gnarled(x) -> Unsmoothed(x)) -> therefore Unsmoothed(laurella) Unsmoothed(laurella) and forall x (Unsmoothed(x) -> Pestilent(x)) -> therefore Pestilent(laurella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Cristine is austrian. Rubina is not uncommon. If something is broadnosed and not uncommon then it is not austrian. All nonbearing, trillionth things are austrian. If Cristine is made then Cristine is not abstemious. Smart, trillionth things are nonbearing. Smart things are broadnosed. All broadnosed things are trillionth. Cristine is nonbearing.", "logic": "\nAustrian(cristine)\nnot Uncommon(rubina)\nforall x (Broadnosed(x) and not Uncommon(x) -> not Austrian(x))\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) and Trillionth(x) -> Austrian(x))\nMade(cristine) -> not Abstemious(cristine)\nforall x (Austrian(x) and Trillionth(x) -> Nonbearing(x))\nforall x (Austrian(x) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Broadnosed(x) -> Trillionth(x))\n\nNonbearing(cristine)\n\nAustrian(cristine) and forall x (Austrian(x) -> Broadnosed(x)) -> therefore Broadnosed(cristine) Broadnosed(cristine) and forall x (Broadnosed(x) -> Trillionth(x)) -> therefore Trillionth(cristine) Austrian(cristine) and Trillionth(cristine) and forall x (Austrian(x) and Trillionth(x) -> Nonbearing(x)) -> therefore Nonbearing(cristine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Daniel is allover. Carly is not imitation. If something is unpunctual and not imitation then it is not allover. All kechuan, mounted things are allover. If Daniel is spangly then Daniel is not offhanded. Smart, mounted things are kechuan. Smart things are unpunctual. All unpunctual things are mounted. Daniel is not kechuan.", "logic": "\nAllover(daniel)\nnot Imitation(carly)\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) and not Imitation(x) -> not Allover(x))\nforall x (Kechuan(x) and Mounted(x) -> Allover(x))\nSpangly(daniel) -> not Offhanded(daniel)\nforall x (Allover(x) and Mounted(x) -> Kechuan(x))\nforall x (Allover(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Mounted(x))\n\nnot Kechuan(daniel)\n\nAllover(daniel) and forall x (Allover(x) -> Unpunctual(x)) -> therefore Unpunctual(daniel) Unpunctual(daniel) and forall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Mounted(x)) -> therefore Mounted(daniel) Allover(daniel) and Mounted(daniel) and forall x (Allover(x) and Mounted(x) -> Kechuan(x)) -> therefore Kechuan(daniel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Corabelle is delphian. Morganica is not swaggering. If something is wacky and not swaggering then it is not delphian. All bemused, scorched things are delphian. If Corabelle is haemolytic then Corabelle is not erroneous. Smart, scorched things are bemused. Smart things are wacky. All wacky things are scorched. Morganica is not scorched.", "logic": "\nDelphian(corabelle)\nnot Swaggering(morganica)\nforall x (Wacky(x) and not Swaggering(x) -> not Delphian(x))\nforall x (Bemused(x) and Scorched(x) -> Delphian(x))\nHaemolytic(corabelle) -> not Erroneous(corabelle)\nforall x (Delphian(x) and Scorched(x) -> Bemused(x))\nforall x (Delphian(x) -> Wacky(x))\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Scorched(x))\n\nnot Scorched(morganica)\n\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Scorched(x)) <- forall x (Delphian(x) -> Wacky(x)) <- forall x (Bemused(x) and Scorched(x) -> Delphian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Peyter is mythical. Erena is not unskilled. If something is sedgy and not unskilled then it is not mythical. All cubical, formalised things are mythical. If Peyter is macro then Peyter is not acanthotic. Smart, formalised things are cubical. Smart things are sedgy. All sedgy things are formalised. Erena is mythical.", "logic": "\nMythical(peyter)\nnot Unskilled(erena)\nforall x (Sedgy(x) and not Unskilled(x) -> not Mythical(x))\nforall x (Cubical(x) and Formalised(x) -> Mythical(x))\nMacro(peyter) -> not Acanthotic(peyter)\nforall x (Mythical(x) and Formalised(x) -> Cubical(x))\nforall x (Mythical(x) -> Sedgy(x))\nforall x (Sedgy(x) -> Formalised(x))\n\nMythical(erena)\n\nforall x (Cubical(x) and Formalised(x) -> Mythical(x)) <- forall x (Mythical(x) and Formalised(x) -> Cubical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Lil is salmon. Quentin is not fallen. If something is vagile and not fallen then it is not salmon. All burled, gnomic things are salmon. If Lil is tireless then Lil is not victorian. Smart, gnomic things are burled. Smart things are vagile. All vagile things are gnomic. Quentin is not burled.", "logic": "\nSalmon(lil)\nnot Fallen(quentin)\nforall x (Vagile(x) and not Fallen(x) -> not Salmon(x))\nforall x (Burled(x) and Gnomic(x) -> Salmon(x))\nTireless(lil) -> not Victorian(lil)\nforall x (Salmon(x) and Gnomic(x) -> Burled(x))\nforall x (Salmon(x) -> Vagile(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) -> Gnomic(x))\n\nnot Burled(quentin)\n\nforall x (Salmon(x) and Gnomic(x) -> Burled(x)) <- forall x (Burled(x) and Gnomic(x) -> Salmon(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Avrom is despairing. Rogers is not infatuated. If something is dextral and not infatuated then it is not despairing. All congested, purulent things are despairing. If Avrom is gushing then Avrom is not emphatic. Smart, purulent things are congested. Smart things are dextral. All dextral things are purulent. Rogers is dextral.", "logic": "\nDespairing(avrom)\nnot Infatuated(rogers)\nforall x (Dextral(x) and not Infatuated(x) -> not Despairing(x))\nforall x (Congested(x) and Purulent(x) -> Despairing(x))\nGushing(avrom) -> not Emphatic(avrom)\nforall x (Despairing(x) and Purulent(x) -> Congested(x))\nforall x (Despairing(x) -> Dextral(x))\nforall x (Dextral(x) -> Purulent(x))\n\nDextral(rogers)\n\nforall x (Despairing(x) -> Dextral(x)) <- forall x (Congested(x) and Purulent(x) -> Despairing(x)) <- forall x (Despairing(x) and Purulent(x) -> Congested(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Moises is isometric. Janina is not bloodless. If something is entire and not bloodless then it is not isometric. All proverbial, prolusory things are isometric. If Moises is anasarcous then Moises is not recyclable. Smart, prolusory things are proverbial. Smart things are entire. All entire things are prolusory. Janina is not recyclable.", "logic": "\nIsometric(moises)\nnot Bloodless(janina)\nforall x (Entire(x) and not Bloodless(x) -> not Isometric(x))\nforall x (Proverbial(x) and Prolusory(x) -> Isometric(x))\nAnasarcous(moises) -> not Recyclable(moises)\nforall x (Isometric(x) and Prolusory(x) -> Proverbial(x))\nforall x (Isometric(x) -> Entire(x))\nforall x (Entire(x) -> Prolusory(x))\n\nnot Recyclable(janina)\n\nnot Recyclable(janina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Alexander is multilane. Cher is not minoan. If something is epiphysial and not minoan then it is not multilane. All terminable, leering things are multilane. If Alexander is eery then Alexander is not rwandan. Smart, leering things are terminable. Smart things are epiphysial. All epiphysial things are leering. Alexander is minoan.", "logic": "\nMultilane(alexander)\nnot Minoan(cher)\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) and not Minoan(x) -> not Multilane(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) and Leering(x) -> Multilane(x))\nEery(alexander) -> not Rwandan(alexander)\nforall x (Multilane(x) and Leering(x) -> Terminable(x))\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Epiphysial(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) -> Leering(x))\n\nMinoan(alexander)\n\nMinoan(alexander) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Buck is procumbent. Harriette is not profound. If something is polluted and not profound then it is not procumbent. All unstinted, hebraic things are procumbent. If Buck is alphameric then Buck is not birchen. Smart, hebraic things are unstinted. Smart things are polluted. All polluted things are hebraic. Buck is not alphameric.", "logic": "\nProcumbent(buck)\nnot Profound(harriette)\nforall x (Polluted(x) and not Profound(x) -> not Procumbent(x))\nforall x (Unstinted(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Procumbent(x))\nAlphameric(buck) -> not Birchen(buck)\nforall x (Procumbent(x) and Hebraic(x) -> Unstinted(x))\nforall x (Procumbent(x) -> Polluted(x))\nforall x (Polluted(x) -> Hebraic(x))\n\nnot Alphameric(buck)\n\nnot Alphameric(buck) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "Mikael is somnific. Edna is not propulsive. If something is holozoic and not propulsive then it is not somnific. All unstrained, unsoiled things are somnific. If Mikael is hygienical then Mikael is not predaceous. Smart, unsoiled things are unstrained. Smart things are holozoic. All holozoic things are unsoiled. Edna is hygienical.", "logic": "\nSomnific(mikael)\nnot Propulsive(edna)\nforall x (Holozoic(x) and not Propulsive(x) -> not Somnific(x))\nforall x (Unstrained(x) and Unsoiled(x) -> Somnific(x))\nHygienical(mikael) -> not Predaceous(mikael)\nforall x (Somnific(x) and Unsoiled(x) -> Unstrained(x))\nforall x (Somnific(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Unsoiled(x))\n\nHygienical(edna)\n\nHygienical(edna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-938"} {"premises": "The barnebas is assertive. The barnebas is careful. The barnebas is threaded. The barnebas is sensate. The barnebas is acetylic. All sensate, acetylic people are careful. If someone is assertive then they are careful. All threaded, acetylic people are sensate. All assertive, careful people are threaded. All careful, assertive people are acetylic. If the barnebas is sensate and the barnebas is threaded then the barnebas is acetylic. The barnebas is acetylic.", "logic": "\nAssertive(barnebas)\nCareful(barnebas)\nThreaded(barnebas)\nSensate(barnebas)\nAcetylic(barnebas)\nforall x (Sensate(x) and Acetylic(x) -> Careful(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) -> Careful(x))\nforall x (Threaded(x) and Acetylic(x) -> Sensate(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) and Careful(x) -> Threaded(x))\nforall x (Careful(x) and Assertive(x) -> Acetylic(x))\nSensate(barnebas) and Threaded(barnebas) -> Acetylic(barnebas)\n\nAcetylic(barnebas)\n\ntherefore Acetylic(barnebas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1763"} {"premises": "The marla is rosy. The marla is bailable. The marla is settled. The marla is triplex. The marla is chordate. All triplex, chordate people are bailable. If someone is rosy then they are bailable. All settled, chordate people are triplex. All rosy, bailable people are settled. All bailable, rosy people are chordate. If the marla is triplex and the marla is settled then the marla is chordate. The marla is not settled.", "logic": "\nRosy(marla)\nBailable(marla)\nSettled(marla)\nTriplex(marla)\nChordate(marla)\nforall x (Triplex(x) and Chordate(x) -> Bailable(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) -> Bailable(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) and Chordate(x) -> Triplex(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) and Bailable(x) -> Settled(x))\nforall x (Bailable(x) and Rosy(x) -> Chordate(x))\nTriplex(marla) and Settled(marla) -> Chordate(marla)\n\nnot Settled(marla)\n\ntherefore Settled(marla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1763"} {"premises": "The chen is nonslip. The chen is paediatric. The chen is unrelaxed. The chen is obviating. The chen is bicorn. All obviating, bicorn people are paediatric. If someone is nonslip then they are paediatric. All unrelaxed, bicorn people are obviating. All nonslip, paediatric people are unrelaxed. All paediatric, nonslip people are bicorn. If the chen is obviating and the chen is unrelaxed then the chen is bicorn. The chen does not need the chen.", "logic": "\nNonslip(chen)\nPaediatric(chen)\nUnrelaxed(chen)\nObviating(chen)\nBicorn(chen)\nforall x (Obviating(x) and Bicorn(x) -> Paediatric(x))\nforall x (Nonslip(x) -> Paediatric(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) and Bicorn(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Nonslip(x) and Paediatric(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) and Nonslip(x) -> Bicorn(x))\nObviating(chen) and Unrelaxed(chen) -> Bicorn(chen)\n\nnot Needs(chen, chen)\n\nnot Needs(chen, chen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1763"} {"premises": "The woodman is siouan. The woodman is cathedral. The woodman is orientated. The woodman is pharyngeal. The woodman is suntanned. All pharyngeal, suntanned people are cathedral. If someone is siouan then they are cathedral. All orientated, suntanned people are pharyngeal. All siouan, cathedral people are orientated. All cathedral, siouan people are suntanned. If the woodman is pharyngeal and the woodman is orientated then the woodman is suntanned. The woodman likes the woodman.", "logic": "\nSiouan(woodman)\nCathedral(woodman)\nOrientated(woodman)\nPharyngeal(woodman)\nSuntanned(woodman)\nforall x (Pharyngeal(x) and Suntanned(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Orientated(x) and Suntanned(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) and Cathedral(x) -> Orientated(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Siouan(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nPharyngeal(woodman) and Orientated(woodman) -> Suntanned(woodman)\n\nLikes(woodman, woodman)\n\nLikes(woodman, woodman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1763"} {"premises": "Jethro is umber. Zebulon is umber. Zebulon is splenic. Goldarina is flatulent. Goldarina is splenic. Chane is not flatulent. Chane is generative. If Goldarina is flatulent and Goldarina is generative then Goldarina is maiden. Goldarina is splenic.", "logic": "\nUmber(jethro)\nUmber(zebulon)\nSplenic(zebulon)\nFlatulent(goldarina)\nSplenic(goldarina)\nnot Flatulent(chane)\nGenerative(chane)\nFlatulent(goldarina) and Generative(goldarina) -> Maiden(goldarina)\n\nSplenic(goldarina)\n\ntherefore Splenic(goldarina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-592"} {"premises": "Phineas is beninese. Bessy is beninese. Bessy is bigeminal. Ula is cognisable. Ula is bigeminal. Britt is not cognisable. Britt is bothersome. If Ula is cognisable and Ula is bothersome then Ula is ruled. Britt is cognisable.", "logic": "\nBeninese(phineas)\nBeninese(bessy)\nBigeminal(bessy)\nCognisable(ula)\nBigeminal(ula)\nnot Cognisable(britt)\nBothersome(britt)\nCognisable(ula) and Bothersome(ula) -> Ruled(ula)\n\nCognisable(britt)\n\ntherefore not Cognisable(britt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-592"} {"premises": "Herminia is apopemptic. Randi is apopemptic. Randi is burdenless. Kimberli is cinematic. Kimberli is burdenless. Titos is not cinematic. Titos is unedifying. If Kimberli is cinematic and Kimberli is unedifying then Kimberli is bilateral. Kimberli is not bilateral.", "logic": "\nApopemptic(herminia)\nApopemptic(randi)\nBurdenless(randi)\nCinematic(kimberli)\nBurdenless(kimberli)\nnot Cinematic(titos)\nUnedifying(titos)\nCinematic(kimberli) and Unedifying(kimberli) -> Bilateral(kimberli)\n\nnot Bilateral(kimberli)\n\nCinematic(kimberli) and Unedifying(kimberli) -> Bilateral(kimberli) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-592"} {"premises": "Karlen is congested. Alexei is congested. Alexei is manual. Willa is boorish. Willa is manual. Corie is not boorish. Corie is atonal. If Willa is boorish and Willa is atonal then Willa is expository. Alexei is rough.", "logic": "\nCongested(karlen)\nCongested(alexei)\nManual(alexei)\nBoorish(willa)\nManual(willa)\nnot Boorish(corie)\nAtonal(corie)\nBoorish(willa) and Atonal(willa) -> Expository(willa)\n\nRough(alexei)\n\nRough(alexei) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-592"} {"premises": "The lucilia mine the michael. The lucilia is apposite. The lucilia is hebrew. The lucilia gird the michael. The michael mine the lucilia. The michael is driving. The michael is asphaltic. The michael is hebrew. The michael remember the lucilia. The michael gird the lucilia. If someone mine the michael and they are asphaltic then they are fluffy. All asphaltic people are hebrew. If someone remember the michael then the michael remember the lucilia. If the lucilia gird the michael and the michael mine the lucilia then the lucilia mine the michael. If someone is asphaltic and they need the michael then the michael is apposite. If someone is apposite then they see the michael. If someone is hebrew then they eat the michael. If someone is fluffy then they are apposite. The lucilia gird the michael.", "logic": "\nMine(lucilia, michael)\nApposite(lucilia)\nHebrew(lucilia)\nGird(lucilia, michael)\nMine(michael, lucilia)\nDriving(michael)\nAsphaltic(michael)\nHebrew(michael)\nRemember(michael, lucilia)\nGird(michael, lucilia)\nforall x (Mine(x, michael) and Asphaltic(x) -> Fluffy(x))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nforall x (Remember(x, michael) -> Remember(michael, lucilia))\nGird(lucilia, michael) and Mine(michael, lucilia) -> Mine(lucilia, michael)\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and Remember(x, michael) -> Apposite(michael))\nforall x (Apposite(x) -> Gird(x, michael))\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Mine(x, michael))\nforall x (Fluffy(x) -> Apposite(x))\n\nGird(lucilia, michael)\n\ntherefore Gird(lucilia, michael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The blanch quarrel the dawna. The blanch is seaward. The blanch is obligated. The blanch orate the dawna. The dawna quarrel the blanch. The dawna is bluish. The dawna is left. The dawna is obligated. The dawna covenant the blanch. The dawna orate the blanch. If someone quarrel the dawna and they are left then they are anxiolytic. All left people are obligated. If someone covenant the dawna then the dawna covenant the blanch. If the blanch orate the dawna and the dawna quarrel the blanch then the blanch quarrel the dawna. If someone is left and they need the dawna then the dawna is seaward. If someone is seaward then they see the dawna. If someone is obligated then they eat the dawna. If someone is anxiolytic then they are seaward. The blanch does not see the dawna.", "logic": "\nQuarrel(blanch, dawna)\nSeaward(blanch)\nObligated(blanch)\nOrate(blanch, dawna)\nQuarrel(dawna, blanch)\nBluish(dawna)\nLeft(dawna)\nObligated(dawna)\nCovenant(dawna, blanch)\nOrate(dawna, blanch)\nforall x (Quarrel(x, dawna) and Left(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Left(x) -> Obligated(x))\nforall x (Covenant(x, dawna) -> Covenant(dawna, blanch))\nOrate(blanch, dawna) and Quarrel(dawna, blanch) -> Quarrel(blanch, dawna)\nforall x (Left(x) and Covenant(x, dawna) -> Seaward(dawna))\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Orate(x, dawna))\nforall x (Obligated(x) -> Quarrel(x, dawna))\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Seaward(x))\n\nnot Orate(blanch, dawna)\n\ntherefore Orate(blanch, dawna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The robbie sightsing the hugh. The robbie is telepathic. The robbie is stealthy. The robbie foreordain the hugh. The hugh sightsing the robbie. The hugh is silly. The hugh is gratuitous. The hugh is stealthy. The hugh talk the robbie. The hugh foreordain the robbie. If someone sightsing the hugh and they are gratuitous then they are intent. All gratuitous people are stealthy. If someone talk the hugh then the hugh talk the robbie. If the robbie foreordain the hugh and the hugh sightsing the robbie then the robbie sightsing the hugh. If someone is gratuitous and they need the hugh then the hugh is telepathic. If someone is telepathic then they see the hugh. If someone is stealthy then they eat the hugh. If someone is intent then they are telepathic. The hugh sightsing the hugh.", "logic": "\nSightsing(robbie, hugh)\nTelepathic(robbie)\nStealthy(robbie)\nForeordain(robbie, hugh)\nSightsing(hugh, robbie)\nSilly(hugh)\nGratuitous(hugh)\nStealthy(hugh)\nTalk(hugh, robbie)\nForeordain(hugh, robbie)\nforall x (Sightsing(x, hugh) and Gratuitous(x) -> Intent(x))\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) -> Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Talk(x, hugh) -> Talk(hugh, robbie))\nForeordain(robbie, hugh) and Sightsing(hugh, robbie) -> Sightsing(robbie, hugh)\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) and Talk(x, hugh) -> Telepathic(hugh))\nforall x (Telepathic(x) -> Foreordain(x, hugh))\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Sightsing(x, hugh))\nforall x (Intent(x) -> Telepathic(x))\n\nSightsing(hugh, hugh)\n\nStealthy(hugh) and forall x (Stealthy(x) -> Sightsing(x, hugh)) -> therefore Sightsing(hugh, hugh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The markus legalise the erastus. The markus is branching. The markus is derived. The markus grout the erastus. The erastus legalise the markus. The erastus is grievous. The erastus is immunised. The erastus is derived. The erastus whiz the markus. The erastus grout the markus. If someone legalise the erastus and they are immunised then they are immense. All immunised people are derived. If someone whiz the erastus then the erastus whiz the markus. If the markus grout the erastus and the erastus legalise the markus then the markus legalise the erastus. If someone is immunised and they need the erastus then the erastus is branching. If someone is branching then they see the erastus. If someone is derived then they eat the erastus. If someone is immense then they are branching. The erastus does not eat the erastus.", "logic": "\nLegalise(markus, erastus)\nBranching(markus)\nDerived(markus)\nGrout(markus, erastus)\nLegalise(erastus, markus)\nGrievous(erastus)\nImmunised(erastus)\nDerived(erastus)\nWhiz(erastus, markus)\nGrout(erastus, markus)\nforall x (Legalise(x, erastus) and Immunised(x) -> Immense(x))\nforall x (Immunised(x) -> Derived(x))\nforall x (Whiz(x, erastus) -> Whiz(erastus, markus))\nGrout(markus, erastus) and Legalise(erastus, markus) -> Legalise(markus, erastus)\nforall x (Immunised(x) and Whiz(x, erastus) -> Branching(erastus))\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Grout(x, erastus))\nforall x (Derived(x) -> Legalise(x, erastus))\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Branching(x))\n\nnot Legalise(erastus, erastus)\n\nDerived(erastus) and forall x (Derived(x) -> Legalise(x, erastus)) -> therefore Legalise(erastus, erastus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The jasmina defray the nadya. The jasmina is freehanded. The jasmina is favourite. The jasmina wham the nadya. The nadya defray the jasmina. The nadya is flowing. The nadya is perfected. The nadya is favourite. The nadya govern the jasmina. The nadya wham the jasmina. If someone defray the nadya and they are perfected then they are insurable. All perfected people are favourite. If someone govern the nadya then the nadya govern the jasmina. If the jasmina wham the nadya and the nadya defray the jasmina then the jasmina defray the nadya. If someone is perfected and they need the nadya then the nadya is freehanded. If someone is freehanded then they see the nadya. If someone is favourite then they eat the nadya. If someone is insurable then they are freehanded. The nadya is insurable.", "logic": "\nDefray(jasmina, nadya)\nFreehanded(jasmina)\nFavourite(jasmina)\nWham(jasmina, nadya)\nDefray(nadya, jasmina)\nFlowing(nadya)\nPerfected(nadya)\nFavourite(nadya)\nGovern(nadya, jasmina)\nWham(nadya, jasmina)\nforall x (Defray(x, nadya) and Perfected(x) -> Insurable(x))\nforall x (Perfected(x) -> Favourite(x))\nforall x (Govern(x, nadya) -> Govern(nadya, jasmina))\nWham(jasmina, nadya) and Defray(nadya, jasmina) -> Defray(jasmina, nadya)\nforall x (Perfected(x) and Govern(x, nadya) -> Freehanded(nadya))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Wham(x, nadya))\nforall x (Favourite(x) -> Defray(x, nadya))\nforall x (Insurable(x) -> Freehanded(x))\n\nInsurable(nadya)\n\nFavourite(nadya) and forall x (Favourite(x) -> Defray(x, nadya)) -> therefore Defray(nadya, nadya) Defray(nadya, nadya) and Perfected(nadya) and forall x (Defray(x, nadya) and Perfected(x) -> Insurable(x)) -> therefore Insurable(nadya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The havivah itch the marcelo. The havivah is sequential. The havivah is myotic. The havivah deprive the marcelo. The marcelo itch the havivah. The marcelo is flighted. The marcelo is risible. The marcelo is myotic. The marcelo desert the havivah. The marcelo deprive the havivah. If someone itch the marcelo and they are risible then they are discoidal. All risible people are myotic. If someone desert the marcelo then the marcelo desert the havivah. If the havivah deprive the marcelo and the marcelo itch the havivah then the havivah itch the marcelo. If someone is risible and they need the marcelo then the marcelo is sequential. If someone is sequential then they see the marcelo. If someone is myotic then they eat the marcelo. If someone is discoidal then they are sequential. The marcelo is not discoidal.", "logic": "\nItch(havivah, marcelo)\nSequential(havivah)\nMyotic(havivah)\nDeprive(havivah, marcelo)\nItch(marcelo, havivah)\nFlighted(marcelo)\nRisible(marcelo)\nMyotic(marcelo)\nDesert(marcelo, havivah)\nDeprive(marcelo, havivah)\nforall x (Itch(x, marcelo) and Risible(x) -> Discoidal(x))\nforall x (Risible(x) -> Myotic(x))\nforall x (Desert(x, marcelo) -> Desert(marcelo, havivah))\nDeprive(havivah, marcelo) and Itch(marcelo, havivah) -> Itch(havivah, marcelo)\nforall x (Risible(x) and Desert(x, marcelo) -> Sequential(marcelo))\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Deprive(x, marcelo))\nforall x (Myotic(x) -> Itch(x, marcelo))\nforall x (Discoidal(x) -> Sequential(x))\n\nnot Discoidal(marcelo)\n\nMyotic(marcelo) and forall x (Myotic(x) -> Itch(x, marcelo)) -> therefore Itch(marcelo, marcelo) Itch(marcelo, marcelo) and Risible(marcelo) and forall x (Itch(x, marcelo) and Risible(x) -> Discoidal(x)) -> therefore Discoidal(marcelo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The paula cronk the ajai. The paula is faceless. The paula is avertible. The paula verbalise the ajai. The ajai cronk the paula. The ajai is sexual. The ajai is capitalist. The ajai is avertible. The ajai overcome the paula. The ajai verbalise the paula. If someone cronk the ajai and they are capitalist then they are unseeyn. All capitalist people are avertible. If someone overcome the ajai then the ajai overcome the paula. If the paula verbalise the ajai and the ajai cronk the paula then the paula cronk the ajai. If someone is capitalist and they need the ajai then the ajai is faceless. If someone is faceless then they see the ajai. If someone is avertible then they eat the ajai. If someone is unseeyn then they are faceless. The ajai is faceless.", "logic": "\nCronk(paula, ajai)\nFaceless(paula)\nAvertible(paula)\nVerbalise(paula, ajai)\nCronk(ajai, paula)\nSexual(ajai)\nCapitalist(ajai)\nAvertible(ajai)\nOvercome(ajai, paula)\nVerbalise(ajai, paula)\nforall x (Cronk(x, ajai) and Capitalist(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Avertible(x))\nforall x (Overcome(x, ajai) -> Overcome(ajai, paula))\nVerbalise(paula, ajai) and Cronk(ajai, paula) -> Cronk(paula, ajai)\nforall x (Capitalist(x) and Overcome(x, ajai) -> Faceless(ajai))\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Verbalise(x, ajai))\nforall x (Avertible(x) -> Cronk(x, ajai))\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) -> Faceless(x))\n\nFaceless(ajai)\n\nAvertible(ajai) and forall x (Avertible(x) -> Cronk(x, ajai)) -> therefore Cronk(ajai, ajai) Cronk(ajai, ajai) and Capitalist(ajai) and forall x (Cronk(x, ajai) and Capitalist(x) -> Unseeyn(x)) -> therefore Unseeyn(ajai) Unseeyn(ajai) and forall x (Unseeyn(x) -> Faceless(x)) -> therefore Faceless(ajai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The julia concertize the marchall. The julia is ascetical. The julia is witting. The julia cipher the marchall. The marchall concertize the julia. The marchall is american. The marchall is unhallowed. The marchall is witting. The marchall squeak the julia. The marchall cipher the julia. If someone concertize the marchall and they are unhallowed then they are upfield. All unhallowed people are witting. If someone squeak the marchall then the marchall squeak the julia. If the julia cipher the marchall and the marchall concertize the julia then the julia concertize the marchall. If someone is unhallowed and they need the marchall then the marchall is ascetical. If someone is ascetical then they see the marchall. If someone is witting then they eat the marchall. If someone is upfield then they are ascetical. The marchall is not ascetical.", "logic": "\nConcertize(julia, marchall)\nAscetical(julia)\nWitting(julia)\nCipher(julia, marchall)\nConcertize(marchall, julia)\nAmerican(marchall)\nUnhallowed(marchall)\nWitting(marchall)\nSqueak(marchall, julia)\nCipher(marchall, julia)\nforall x (Concertize(x, marchall) and Unhallowed(x) -> Upfield(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) -> Witting(x))\nforall x (Squeak(x, marchall) -> Squeak(marchall, julia))\nCipher(julia, marchall) and Concertize(marchall, julia) -> Concertize(julia, marchall)\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and Squeak(x, marchall) -> Ascetical(marchall))\nforall x (Ascetical(x) -> Cipher(x, marchall))\nforall x (Witting(x) -> Concertize(x, marchall))\nforall x (Upfield(x) -> Ascetical(x))\n\nnot Ascetical(marchall)\n\nWitting(marchall) and forall x (Witting(x) -> Concertize(x, marchall)) -> therefore Concertize(marchall, marchall) Concertize(marchall, marchall) and Unhallowed(marchall) and forall x (Concertize(x, marchall) and Unhallowed(x) -> Upfield(x)) -> therefore Upfield(marchall) Upfield(marchall) and forall x (Upfield(x) -> Ascetical(x)) -> therefore Ascetical(marchall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The virge borrow the tybie. The virge is deterrent. The virge is applied. The virge exercise the tybie. The tybie borrow the virge. The tybie is sensate. The tybie is mucky. The tybie is applied. The tybie aggrandise the virge. The tybie exercise the virge. If someone borrow the tybie and they are mucky then they are adulterant. All mucky people are applied. If someone aggrandise the tybie then the tybie aggrandise the virge. If the virge exercise the tybie and the tybie borrow the virge then the virge borrow the tybie. If someone is mucky and they need the tybie then the tybie is deterrent. If someone is deterrent then they see the tybie. If someone is applied then they eat the tybie. If someone is adulterant then they are deterrent. The virge is not adulterant.", "logic": "\nBorrow(virge, tybie)\nDeterrent(virge)\nApplied(virge)\nExercise(virge, tybie)\nBorrow(tybie, virge)\nSensate(tybie)\nMucky(tybie)\nApplied(tybie)\nAggrandise(tybie, virge)\nExercise(tybie, virge)\nforall x (Borrow(x, tybie) and Mucky(x) -> Adulterant(x))\nforall x (Mucky(x) -> Applied(x))\nforall x (Aggrandise(x, tybie) -> Aggrandise(tybie, virge))\nExercise(virge, tybie) and Borrow(tybie, virge) -> Borrow(virge, tybie)\nforall x (Mucky(x) and Aggrandise(x, tybie) -> Deterrent(tybie))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) -> Exercise(x, tybie))\nforall x (Applied(x) -> Borrow(x, tybie))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> Deterrent(x))\n\nnot Adulterant(virge)\n\nforall x (Borrow(x, tybie) and Mucky(x) -> Adulterant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The christian enucleate the franciska. The christian is taboo. The christian is discalced. The christian deserve the franciska. The franciska enucleate the christian. The franciska is propellant. The franciska is matured. The franciska is discalced. The franciska aviate the christian. The franciska deserve the christian. If someone enucleate the franciska and they are matured then they are mantled. All matured people are discalced. If someone aviate the franciska then the franciska aviate the christian. If the christian deserve the franciska and the franciska enucleate the christian then the christian enucleate the franciska. If someone is matured and they need the franciska then the franciska is taboo. If someone is taboo then they see the franciska. If someone is discalced then they eat the franciska. If someone is mantled then they are taboo. The christian is propellant.", "logic": "\nEnucleate(christian, franciska)\nTaboo(christian)\nDiscalced(christian)\nDeserve(christian, franciska)\nEnucleate(franciska, christian)\nPropellant(franciska)\nMatured(franciska)\nDiscalced(franciska)\nAviate(franciska, christian)\nDeserve(franciska, christian)\nforall x (Enucleate(x, franciska) and Matured(x) -> Mantled(x))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Aviate(x, franciska) -> Aviate(franciska, christian))\nDeserve(christian, franciska) and Enucleate(franciska, christian) -> Enucleate(christian, franciska)\nforall x (Matured(x) and Aviate(x, franciska) -> Taboo(franciska))\nforall x (Taboo(x) -> Deserve(x, franciska))\nforall x (Discalced(x) -> Enucleate(x, franciska))\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Taboo(x))\n\nPropellant(christian)\n\nPropellant(christian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The malkah access the shirline. The malkah is laughing. The malkah is farthest. The malkah badge the shirline. The shirline access the malkah. The shirline is speaking. The shirline is apsidal. The shirline is farthest. The shirline demolish the malkah. The shirline badge the malkah. If someone access the shirline and they are apsidal then they are pockmarked. All apsidal people are farthest. If someone demolish the shirline then the shirline demolish the malkah. If the malkah badge the shirline and the shirline access the malkah then the malkah access the shirline. If someone is apsidal and they need the shirline then the shirline is laughing. If someone is laughing then they see the shirline. If someone is farthest then they eat the shirline. If someone is pockmarked then they are laughing. The malkah does not eat the malkah.", "logic": "\nAccess(malkah, shirline)\nLaughing(malkah)\nFarthest(malkah)\nBadge(malkah, shirline)\nAccess(shirline, malkah)\nSpeaking(shirline)\nApsidal(shirline)\nFarthest(shirline)\nDemolish(shirline, malkah)\nBadge(shirline, malkah)\nforall x (Access(x, shirline) and Apsidal(x) -> Pockmarked(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) -> Farthest(x))\nforall x (Demolish(x, shirline) -> Demolish(shirline, malkah))\nBadge(malkah, shirline) and Access(shirline, malkah) -> Access(malkah, shirline)\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and Demolish(x, shirline) -> Laughing(shirline))\nforall x (Laughing(x) -> Badge(x, shirline))\nforall x (Farthest(x) -> Access(x, shirline))\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) -> Laughing(x))\n\nnot Access(malkah, malkah)\n\nnot Access(malkah, malkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The tabbie reconquer the eldon. The tabbie is impolitic. The tabbie is selfish. The tabbie botanise the eldon. The eldon reconquer the tabbie. The eldon is cheering. The eldon is premature. The eldon is selfish. The eldon chuff the tabbie. The eldon botanise the tabbie. If someone reconquer the eldon and they are premature then they are raging. All premature people are selfish. If someone chuff the eldon then the eldon chuff the tabbie. If the tabbie botanise the eldon and the eldon reconquer the tabbie then the tabbie reconquer the eldon. If someone is premature and they need the eldon then the eldon is impolitic. If someone is impolitic then they see the eldon. If someone is selfish then they eat the eldon. If someone is raging then they are impolitic. The tabbie chuff the eldon.", "logic": "\nReconquer(tabbie, eldon)\nImpolitic(tabbie)\nSelfish(tabbie)\nBotanise(tabbie, eldon)\nReconquer(eldon, tabbie)\nCheering(eldon)\nPremature(eldon)\nSelfish(eldon)\nChuff(eldon, tabbie)\nBotanise(eldon, tabbie)\nforall x (Reconquer(x, eldon) and Premature(x) -> Raging(x))\nforall x (Premature(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Chuff(x, eldon) -> Chuff(eldon, tabbie))\nBotanise(tabbie, eldon) and Reconquer(eldon, tabbie) -> Reconquer(tabbie, eldon)\nforall x (Premature(x) and Chuff(x, eldon) -> Impolitic(eldon))\nforall x (Impolitic(x) -> Botanise(x, eldon))\nforall x (Selfish(x) -> Reconquer(x, eldon))\nforall x (Raging(x) -> Impolitic(x))\n\nChuff(tabbie, eldon)\n\nChuff(tabbie, eldon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The genovera metricate the briny. The genovera is stemless. The genovera is swell. The genovera spondaise the briny. The briny metricate the genovera. The briny is patented. The briny is tame. The briny is swell. The briny graze the genovera. The briny spondaise the genovera. If someone metricate the briny and they are tame then they are rancorous. All tame people are swell. If someone graze the briny then the briny graze the genovera. If the genovera spondaise the briny and the briny metricate the genovera then the genovera metricate the briny. If someone is tame and they need the briny then the briny is stemless. If someone is stemless then they see the briny. If someone is swell then they eat the briny. If someone is rancorous then they are stemless. The briny does not need the briny.", "logic": "\nMetricate(genovera, briny)\nStemless(genovera)\nSwell(genovera)\nSpondaise(genovera, briny)\nMetricate(briny, genovera)\nPatented(briny)\nTame(briny)\nSwell(briny)\nGraze(briny, genovera)\nSpondaise(briny, genovera)\nforall x (Metricate(x, briny) and Tame(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Swell(x))\nforall x (Graze(x, briny) -> Graze(briny, genovera))\nSpondaise(genovera, briny) and Metricate(briny, genovera) -> Metricate(genovera, briny)\nforall x (Tame(x) and Graze(x, briny) -> Stemless(briny))\nforall x (Stemless(x) -> Spondaise(x, briny))\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Metricate(x, briny))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) -> Stemless(x))\n\nnot Graze(briny, briny)\n\nnot Graze(briny, briny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The graeme chant the emmy. The graeme is achromous. The graeme is undated. The graeme humidify the emmy. The emmy chant the graeme. The emmy is assigned. The emmy is muscovite. The emmy is undated. The emmy denitrify the graeme. The emmy humidify the graeme. If someone chant the emmy and they are muscovite then they are lingulate. All muscovite people are undated. If someone denitrify the emmy then the emmy denitrify the graeme. If the graeme humidify the emmy and the emmy chant the graeme then the graeme chant the emmy. If someone is muscovite and they need the emmy then the emmy is achromous. If someone is achromous then they see the emmy. If someone is undated then they eat the emmy. If someone is lingulate then they are achromous. The graeme is muscovite.", "logic": "\nChant(graeme, emmy)\nAchromous(graeme)\nUndated(graeme)\nHumidify(graeme, emmy)\nChant(emmy, graeme)\nAssigned(emmy)\nMuscovite(emmy)\nUndated(emmy)\nDenitrify(emmy, graeme)\nHumidify(emmy, graeme)\nforall x (Chant(x, emmy) and Muscovite(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Muscovite(x) -> Undated(x))\nforall x (Denitrify(x, emmy) -> Denitrify(emmy, graeme))\nHumidify(graeme, emmy) and Chant(emmy, graeme) -> Chant(graeme, emmy)\nforall x (Muscovite(x) and Denitrify(x, emmy) -> Achromous(emmy))\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Humidify(x, emmy))\nforall x (Undated(x) -> Chant(x, emmy))\nforall x (Lingulate(x) -> Achromous(x))\n\nMuscovite(graeme)\n\nMuscovite(graeme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The dianna snivel the sherlock. The dianna is demotic. The dianna is manifest. The dianna wrawl the sherlock. The sherlock snivel the dianna. The sherlock is molal. The sherlock is enfeebling. The sherlock is manifest. The sherlock unnerve the dianna. The sherlock wrawl the dianna. If someone snivel the sherlock and they are enfeebling then they are modal. All enfeebling people are manifest. If someone unnerve the sherlock then the sherlock unnerve the dianna. If the dianna wrawl the sherlock and the sherlock snivel the dianna then the dianna snivel the sherlock. If someone is enfeebling and they need the sherlock then the sherlock is demotic. If someone is demotic then they see the sherlock. If someone is manifest then they eat the sherlock. If someone is modal then they are demotic. The dianna does not see the dianna.", "logic": "\nSnivel(dianna, sherlock)\nDemotic(dianna)\nManifest(dianna)\nWrawl(dianna, sherlock)\nSnivel(sherlock, dianna)\nMolal(sherlock)\nEnfeebling(sherlock)\nManifest(sherlock)\nUnnerve(sherlock, dianna)\nWrawl(sherlock, dianna)\nforall x (Snivel(x, sherlock) and Enfeebling(x) -> Modal(x))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Unnerve(x, sherlock) -> Unnerve(sherlock, dianna))\nWrawl(dianna, sherlock) and Snivel(sherlock, dianna) -> Snivel(dianna, sherlock)\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) and Unnerve(x, sherlock) -> Demotic(sherlock))\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Wrawl(x, sherlock))\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Snivel(x, sherlock))\nforall x (Modal(x) -> Demotic(x))\n\nnot Wrawl(dianna, dianna)\n\nnot Wrawl(dianna, dianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "The bethanne valuate the dwane. The bethanne is unlearned. The bethanne is dual. The bethanne repatriate the dwane. The dwane valuate the bethanne. The dwane is dilute. The dwane is collusive. The dwane is dual. The dwane funk the bethanne. The dwane repatriate the bethanne. If someone valuate the dwane and they are collusive then they are uncarpeted. All collusive people are dual. If someone funk the dwane then the dwane funk the bethanne. If the bethanne repatriate the dwane and the dwane valuate the bethanne then the bethanne valuate the dwane. If someone is collusive and they need the dwane then the dwane is unlearned. If someone is unlearned then they see the dwane. If someone is dual then they eat the dwane. If someone is uncarpeted then they are unlearned. The bethanne funk the bethanne.", "logic": "\nValuate(bethanne, dwane)\nUnlearned(bethanne)\nDual(bethanne)\nRepatriate(bethanne, dwane)\nValuate(dwane, bethanne)\nDilute(dwane)\nCollusive(dwane)\nDual(dwane)\nFunk(dwane, bethanne)\nRepatriate(dwane, bethanne)\nforall x (Valuate(x, dwane) and Collusive(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Funk(x, dwane) -> Funk(dwane, bethanne))\nRepatriate(bethanne, dwane) and Valuate(dwane, bethanne) -> Valuate(bethanne, dwane)\nforall x (Collusive(x) and Funk(x, dwane) -> Unlearned(dwane))\nforall x (Unlearned(x) -> Repatriate(x, dwane))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Valuate(x, dwane))\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) -> Unlearned(x))\n\nFunk(bethanne, bethanne)\n\nFunk(bethanne, bethanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-476"} {"premises": "Prasad is heedful. Binky is knotty. If Prasad is vital then Prasad is adulterant. All banned people are vital. If someone is heedful then they are banned. Prasad is heedful.", "logic": "\nHeedful(prasad)\nKnotty(binky)\nVital(prasad) -> Adulterant(prasad)\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Vital(x))\nforall x (Heedful(x) -> Banned(x))\n\nHeedful(prasad)\n\ntherefore Heedful(prasad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Quinlan is abnaki. Rodolphe is splenic. If Quinlan is raftered then Quinlan is threadlike. All august people are raftered. If someone is abnaki then they are august. Quinlan is not abnaki.", "logic": "\nAbnaki(quinlan)\nSplenic(rodolphe)\nRaftered(quinlan) -> Threadlike(quinlan)\nforall x (August(x) -> Raftered(x))\nforall x (Abnaki(x) -> August(x))\n\nnot Abnaki(quinlan)\n\ntherefore Abnaki(quinlan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Noel is theistical. Kizzee is received. If Noel is fanatical then Noel is cometary. All ignoble people are fanatical. If someone is theistical then they are ignoble. Noel is ignoble.", "logic": "\nTheistical(noel)\nReceived(kizzee)\nFanatical(noel) -> Cometary(noel)\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Fanatical(x))\nforall x (Theistical(x) -> Ignoble(x))\n\nIgnoble(noel)\n\nTheistical(noel) and forall x (Theistical(x) -> Ignoble(x)) -> therefore Ignoble(noel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Shelby is earliest. Jeffry is unnameable. If Shelby is rubbishy then Shelby is vitreous. All fruitless people are rubbishy. If someone is earliest then they are fruitless. Shelby is not fruitless.", "logic": "\nEarliest(shelby)\nUnnameable(jeffry)\nRubbishy(shelby) -> Vitreous(shelby)\nforall x (Fruitless(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Fruitless(x))\n\nnot Fruitless(shelby)\n\nEarliest(shelby) and forall x (Earliest(x) -> Fruitless(x)) -> therefore Fruitless(shelby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Amandie is excessive. Wylma is luxuriant. If Amandie is diastolic then Amandie is shrinkable. All forgiving people are diastolic. If someone is excessive then they are forgiving. Amandie is diastolic.", "logic": "\nExcessive(amandie)\nLuxuriant(wylma)\nDiastolic(amandie) -> Shrinkable(amandie)\nforall x (Forgiving(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Excessive(x) -> Forgiving(x))\n\nDiastolic(amandie)\n\nExcessive(amandie) and forall x (Excessive(x) -> Forgiving(x)) -> therefore Forgiving(amandie) Forgiving(amandie) and forall x (Forgiving(x) -> Diastolic(x)) -> therefore Diastolic(amandie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Dora is conveyable. Maria is wrapped. If Dora is quirky then Dora is aleutian. All comic people are quirky. If someone is conveyable then they are comic. Dora is not quirky.", "logic": "\nConveyable(dora)\nWrapped(maria)\nQuirky(dora) -> Aleutian(dora)\nforall x (Comic(x) -> Quirky(x))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Comic(x))\n\nnot Quirky(dora)\n\nConveyable(dora) and forall x (Conveyable(x) -> Comic(x)) -> therefore Comic(dora) Comic(dora) and forall x (Comic(x) -> Quirky(x)) -> therefore Quirky(dora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Antonino is panoptic. Rodney is coiled. If Antonino is embonpoint then Antonino is gloomful. All tutelar people are embonpoint. If someone is panoptic then they are tutelar. Antonino is gloomful.", "logic": "\nPanoptic(antonino)\nCoiled(rodney)\nEmbonpoint(antonino) -> Gloomful(antonino)\nforall x (Tutelar(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Tutelar(x))\n\nGloomful(antonino)\n\nPanoptic(antonino) and forall x (Panoptic(x) -> Tutelar(x)) -> therefore Tutelar(antonino) Tutelar(antonino) and forall x (Tutelar(x) -> Embonpoint(x)) -> therefore Embonpoint(antonino) Embonpoint(antonino) and Embonpoint(antonino) -> Gloomful(antonino) -> therefore Gloomful(antonino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Odysseus is caprine. Austine is negotiable. If Odysseus is turkish then Odysseus is bogus. All choosey people are turkish. If someone is caprine then they are choosey. Odysseus is not bogus.", "logic": "\nCaprine(odysseus)\nNegotiable(austine)\nTurkish(odysseus) -> Bogus(odysseus)\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Turkish(x))\nforall x (Caprine(x) -> Choosey(x))\n\nnot Bogus(odysseus)\n\nCaprine(odysseus) and forall x (Caprine(x) -> Choosey(x)) -> therefore Choosey(odysseus) Choosey(odysseus) and forall x (Choosey(x) -> Turkish(x)) -> therefore Turkish(odysseus) Turkish(odysseus) and Turkish(odysseus) -> Bogus(odysseus) -> therefore Bogus(odysseus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Bendite is assaultive. Sanderson is quadrate. If Bendite is dense then Bendite is brut. All allogamous people are dense. If someone is assaultive then they are allogamous. Sanderson is not dense.", "logic": "\nAssaultive(bendite)\nQuadrate(sanderson)\nDense(bendite) -> Brut(bendite)\nforall x (Allogamous(x) -> Dense(x))\nforall x (Assaultive(x) -> Allogamous(x))\n\nnot Dense(sanderson)\n\nforall x (Allogamous(x) -> Dense(x)) <- forall x (Assaultive(x) -> Allogamous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Durward is gloomy. Audie is colored. If Durward is connected then Durward is gawky. All fogged people are connected. If someone is gloomy then they are fogged. Audie is fogged.", "logic": "\nGloomy(durward)\nColored(audie)\nConnected(durward) -> Gawky(durward)\nforall x (Fogged(x) -> Connected(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> Fogged(x))\n\nFogged(audie)\n\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> Fogged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Annalise is accredited. Ealasaid is unexciting. If Annalise is bicolored then Annalise is relational. All carious people are bicolored. If someone is accredited then they are carious. Ealasaid is not accredited.", "logic": "\nAccredited(annalise)\nUnexciting(ealasaid)\nBicolored(annalise) -> Relational(annalise)\nforall x (Carious(x) -> Bicolored(x))\nforall x (Accredited(x) -> Carious(x))\n\nnot Accredited(ealasaid)\n\nnot Accredited(ealasaid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Jodi is autistic. Blake is winey. If Jodi is worldwide then Jodi is quiescent. All augitic people are worldwide. If someone is autistic then they are augitic. Blake is quiescent.", "logic": "\nAutistic(jodi)\nWiney(blake)\nWorldwide(jodi) -> Quiescent(jodi)\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Worldwide(x))\nforall x (Autistic(x) -> Augitic(x))\n\nQuiescent(blake)\n\nQuiescent(blake) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Wandie is carpeted. Thomasine is swayback. If Wandie is rapturous then Wandie is adjectival. All yeastlike people are rapturous. If someone is carpeted then they are yeastlike. Thomasine is not quiet.", "logic": "\nCarpeted(wandie)\nSwayback(thomasine)\nRapturous(wandie) -> Adjectival(wandie)\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) -> Rapturous(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Yeastlike(x))\n\nnot Quiet(thomasine)\n\nnot Quiet(thomasine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Bunni is outsized. Bunnie is legible. If Bunni is untreated then Bunni is equestrian. All outback people are untreated. If someone is outsized then they are outback. Bunni is legible.", "logic": "\nOutsized(bunni)\nLegible(bunnie)\nUntreated(bunni) -> Equestrian(bunni)\nforall x (Outback(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Outsized(x) -> Outback(x))\n\nLegible(bunni)\n\nLegible(bunni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Katharine is ungentle. Wildon is undaunted. If Katharine is illiberal then Katharine is cetacean. All trabeated people are illiberal. If someone is ungentle then they are trabeated. Katharine is not red.", "logic": "\nUngentle(katharine)\nUndaunted(wildon)\nIlliberal(katharine) -> Cetacean(katharine)\nforall x (Trabeated(x) -> Illiberal(x))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) -> Trabeated(x))\n\nnot Red(katharine)\n\nnot Red(katharine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Sauncho is intriguing. Laurens is sour. If Sauncho is liverish then Sauncho is built. All crusted people are liverish. If someone is intriguing then they are crusted. Sauncho is quiet.", "logic": "\nIntriguing(sauncho)\nSour(laurens)\nLiverish(sauncho) -> Built(sauncho)\nforall x (Crusted(x) -> Liverish(x))\nforall x (Intriguing(x) -> Crusted(x))\n\nQuiet(sauncho)\n\nQuiet(sauncho) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "Daphene is airborne. Cathy is accursed. Korrie is twilit. Delila is shrimpy. If someone is airborne and accessory then they are shrimpy. All accessory, twilit people are thin. If Delila is shrimpy then Delila is thin. If someone is shrimpy then they are peaty. All accursed people are accessory. Cold, thin people are accursed. Round people are peaty. If Daphene is shrimpy and Daphene is peaty then Daphene is twilit. Daphene is airborne.", "logic": "\nAirborne(daphene)\nAccursed(cathy)\nTwilit(korrie)\nShrimpy(delila)\nforall x (Airborne(x) and Accessory(x) -> Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Twilit(x) -> Thin(x))\nShrimpy(delila) -> Thin(delila)\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Peaty(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Accessory(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) and Thin(x) -> Accursed(x))\nforall x (Thin(x) -> Peaty(x))\nShrimpy(daphene) and Peaty(daphene) -> Twilit(daphene)\n\nAirborne(daphene)\n\ntherefore Airborne(daphene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Meredith is humid. Kaspar is afferent. Kate is grouchy. Trenton is inapposite. If someone is humid and unreal then they are inapposite. All unreal, grouchy people are intended. If Trenton is inapposite then Trenton is intended. If someone is inapposite then they are recurved. All afferent people are unreal. Cold, intended people are afferent. Round people are recurved. If Meredith is inapposite and Meredith is recurved then Meredith is grouchy. Trenton is not inapposite.", "logic": "\nHumid(meredith)\nAfferent(kaspar)\nGrouchy(kate)\nInapposite(trenton)\nforall x (Humid(x) and Unreal(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Unreal(x) and Grouchy(x) -> Intended(x))\nInapposite(trenton) -> Intended(trenton)\nforall x (Inapposite(x) -> Recurved(x))\nforall x (Afferent(x) -> Unreal(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and Intended(x) -> Afferent(x))\nforall x (Intended(x) -> Recurved(x))\nInapposite(meredith) and Recurved(meredith) -> Grouchy(meredith)\n\nnot Inapposite(trenton)\n\ntherefore Inapposite(trenton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Erhart is booked. Hamilton is inflatable. Tiler is horizontal. Munroe is piggy. If someone is booked and feminine then they are piggy. All feminine, horizontal people are bolometric. If Munroe is piggy then Munroe is bolometric. If someone is piggy then they are autumnal. All inflatable people are feminine. Cold, bolometric people are inflatable. Round people are autumnal. If Erhart is piggy and Erhart is autumnal then Erhart is horizontal. Hamilton is feminine.", "logic": "\nBooked(erhart)\nInflatable(hamilton)\nHorizontal(tiler)\nPiggy(munroe)\nforall x (Booked(x) and Feminine(x) -> Piggy(x))\nforall x (Feminine(x) and Horizontal(x) -> Bolometric(x))\nPiggy(munroe) -> Bolometric(munroe)\nforall x (Piggy(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) -> Feminine(x))\nforall x (Autumnal(x) and Bolometric(x) -> Inflatable(x))\nforall x (Bolometric(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nPiggy(erhart) and Autumnal(erhart) -> Horizontal(erhart)\n\nFeminine(hamilton)\n\nInflatable(hamilton) and forall x (Inflatable(x) -> Feminine(x)) -> therefore Feminine(hamilton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Marvin is copesetic. Aina is bluish. Cyrillus is reachable. Nelly is raisable. If someone is copesetic and crocketed then they are raisable. All crocketed, reachable people are contrasty. If Nelly is raisable then Nelly is contrasty. If someone is raisable then they are cormose. All bluish people are crocketed. Cold, contrasty people are bluish. Round people are cormose. If Marvin is raisable and Marvin is cormose then Marvin is reachable. Nelly is not contrasty.", "logic": "\nCopesetic(marvin)\nBluish(aina)\nReachable(cyrillus)\nRaisable(nelly)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Raisable(x))\nforall x (Crocketed(x) and Reachable(x) -> Contrasty(x))\nRaisable(nelly) -> Contrasty(nelly)\nforall x (Raisable(x) -> Cormose(x))\nforall x (Bluish(x) -> Crocketed(x))\nforall x (Cormose(x) and Contrasty(x) -> Bluish(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Cormose(x))\nRaisable(marvin) and Cormose(marvin) -> Reachable(marvin)\n\nnot Contrasty(nelly)\n\nRaisable(nelly) and Raisable(nelly) -> Contrasty(nelly) -> therefore Contrasty(nelly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Stella is resinous. Abagail is rife. Alys is more. Ariadne is worn. If someone is resinous and unaffixed then they are worn. All unaffixed, more people are unsleeping. If Ariadne is worn then Ariadne is unsleeping. If someone is worn then they are thundering. All rife people are unaffixed. Cold, unsleeping people are rife. Round people are thundering. If Stella is worn and Stella is thundering then Stella is more. Ariadne is rife.", "logic": "\nResinous(stella)\nRife(abagail)\nMore(alys)\nWorn(ariadne)\nforall x (Resinous(x) and Unaffixed(x) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) and More(x) -> Unsleeping(x))\nWorn(ariadne) -> Unsleeping(ariadne)\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Thundering(x))\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\nforall x (Thundering(x) and Unsleeping(x) -> Rife(x))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) -> Thundering(x))\nWorn(stella) and Thundering(stella) -> More(stella)\n\nRife(ariadne)\n\nWorn(ariadne) and forall x (Worn(x) -> Thundering(x)) -> therefore Thundering(ariadne) Worn(ariadne) and Worn(ariadne) -> Unsleeping(ariadne) -> therefore Unsleeping(ariadne) Thundering(ariadne) and Unsleeping(ariadne) and forall x (Thundering(x) and Unsleeping(x) -> Rife(x)) -> therefore Rife(ariadne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Janette is tilted. Bay is apogamic. Constanta is outside. Konstanze is cosher. If someone is tilted and steadfast then they are cosher. All steadfast, outside people are milled. If Konstanze is cosher then Konstanze is milled. If someone is cosher then they are haptic. All apogamic people are steadfast. Cold, milled people are apogamic. Round people are haptic. If Janette is cosher and Janette is haptic then Janette is outside. Konstanze is not apogamic.", "logic": "\nTilted(janette)\nApogamic(bay)\nOutside(constanta)\nCosher(konstanze)\nforall x (Tilted(x) and Steadfast(x) -> Cosher(x))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) and Outside(x) -> Milled(x))\nCosher(konstanze) -> Milled(konstanze)\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> Haptic(x))\nforall x (Apogamic(x) -> Steadfast(x))\nforall x (Haptic(x) and Milled(x) -> Apogamic(x))\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Haptic(x))\nCosher(janette) and Haptic(janette) -> Outside(janette)\n\nnot Apogamic(konstanze)\n\nCosher(konstanze) and forall x (Cosher(x) -> Haptic(x)) -> therefore Haptic(konstanze) Cosher(konstanze) and Cosher(konstanze) -> Milled(konstanze) -> therefore Milled(konstanze) Haptic(konstanze) and Milled(konstanze) and forall x (Haptic(x) and Milled(x) -> Apogamic(x)) -> therefore Apogamic(konstanze)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Herby is untreated. Tome is wimpy. Lucas is asteriated. Gabriel is photogenic. If someone is untreated and heartfelt then they are photogenic. All heartfelt, asteriated people are reversible. If Gabriel is photogenic then Gabriel is reversible. If someone is photogenic then they are stagey. All wimpy people are heartfelt. Cold, reversible people are wimpy. Round people are stagey. If Herby is photogenic and Herby is stagey then Herby is asteriated. Gabriel is heartfelt.", "logic": "\nUntreated(herby)\nWimpy(tome)\nAsteriated(lucas)\nPhotogenic(gabriel)\nforall x (Untreated(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Photogenic(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) and Asteriated(x) -> Reversible(x))\nPhotogenic(gabriel) -> Reversible(gabriel)\nforall x (Photogenic(x) -> Stagey(x))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) -> Heartfelt(x))\nforall x (Stagey(x) and Reversible(x) -> Wimpy(x))\nforall x (Reversible(x) -> Stagey(x))\nPhotogenic(herby) and Stagey(herby) -> Asteriated(herby)\n\nHeartfelt(gabriel)\n\nPhotogenic(gabriel) and forall x (Photogenic(x) -> Stagey(x)) -> therefore Stagey(gabriel) Photogenic(gabriel) and Photogenic(gabriel) -> Reversible(gabriel) -> therefore Reversible(gabriel) Stagey(gabriel) and Reversible(gabriel) and forall x (Stagey(x) and Reversible(x) -> Wimpy(x)) -> therefore Wimpy(gabriel) Wimpy(gabriel) and forall x (Wimpy(x) -> Heartfelt(x)) -> therefore Heartfelt(gabriel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Dasie is albinotic. Suzetta is bimestrial. Genvieve is beetling. Kim is anisogamic. If someone is albinotic and teary then they are anisogamic. All teary, beetling people are diaphysial. If Kim is anisogamic then Kim is diaphysial. If someone is anisogamic then they are agnatic. All bimestrial people are teary. Cold, diaphysial people are bimestrial. Round people are agnatic. If Dasie is anisogamic and Dasie is agnatic then Dasie is beetling. Kim is not teary.", "logic": "\nAlbinotic(dasie)\nBimestrial(suzetta)\nBeetling(genvieve)\nAnisogamic(kim)\nforall x (Albinotic(x) and Teary(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Teary(x) and Beetling(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nAnisogamic(kim) -> Diaphysial(kim)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Agnatic(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Teary(x))\nforall x (Agnatic(x) and Diaphysial(x) -> Bimestrial(x))\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) -> Agnatic(x))\nAnisogamic(dasie) and Agnatic(dasie) -> Beetling(dasie)\n\nnot Teary(kim)\n\nAnisogamic(kim) and forall x (Anisogamic(x) -> Agnatic(x)) -> therefore Agnatic(kim) Anisogamic(kim) and Anisogamic(kim) -> Diaphysial(kim) -> therefore Diaphysial(kim) Agnatic(kim) and Diaphysial(kim) and forall x (Agnatic(x) and Diaphysial(x) -> Bimestrial(x)) -> therefore Bimestrial(kim) Bimestrial(kim) and forall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Teary(x)) -> therefore Teary(kim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Karylin is pithy. Arne is permissive. Benjamin is confident. Jeannette is unneeded. If someone is pithy and knobbly then they are unneeded. All knobbly, confident people are buttery. If Jeannette is unneeded then Jeannette is buttery. If someone is unneeded then they are cardiac. All permissive people are knobbly. Cold, buttery people are permissive. Round people are cardiac. If Karylin is unneeded and Karylin is cardiac then Karylin is confident. Karylin is not knobbly.", "logic": "\nPithy(karylin)\nPermissive(arne)\nConfident(benjamin)\nUnneeded(jeannette)\nforall x (Pithy(x) and Knobbly(x) -> Unneeded(x))\nforall x (Knobbly(x) and Confident(x) -> Buttery(x))\nUnneeded(jeannette) -> Buttery(jeannette)\nforall x (Unneeded(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Knobbly(x))\nforall x (Cardiac(x) and Buttery(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nUnneeded(karylin) and Cardiac(karylin) -> Confident(karylin)\n\nnot Knobbly(karylin)\n\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Knobbly(x)) <- forall x (Cardiac(x) and Buttery(x) -> Permissive(x)) <- forall x (Knobbly(x) and Confident(x) -> Buttery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Charmine is modular. Nerissa is cloze. Abagael is caruncular. Marylin is incisive. If someone is modular and crosstown then they are incisive. All crosstown, caruncular people are parvenue. If Marylin is incisive then Marylin is parvenue. If someone is incisive then they are changing. All cloze people are crosstown. Cold, parvenue people are cloze. Round people are changing. If Charmine is incisive and Charmine is changing then Charmine is caruncular. Nerissa is changing.", "logic": "\nModular(charmine)\nCloze(nerissa)\nCaruncular(abagael)\nIncisive(marylin)\nforall x (Modular(x) and Crosstown(x) -> Incisive(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) and Caruncular(x) -> Parvenue(x))\nIncisive(marylin) -> Parvenue(marylin)\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Changing(x))\nforall x (Cloze(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Changing(x) and Parvenue(x) -> Cloze(x))\nforall x (Parvenue(x) -> Changing(x))\nIncisive(charmine) and Changing(charmine) -> Caruncular(charmine)\n\nChanging(nerissa)\n\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Changing(x)) <- forall x (Modular(x) and Crosstown(x) -> Incisive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Oscar is bicapsular. Nadean is winglike. Bernette is rimy. Carlyn is clonic. If someone is bicapsular and ravishing then they are clonic. All ravishing, rimy people are chivalrous. If Carlyn is clonic then Carlyn is chivalrous. If someone is clonic then they are numeric. All winglike people are ravishing. Cold, chivalrous people are winglike. Round people are numeric. If Oscar is clonic and Oscar is numeric then Oscar is rimy. Bernette is not winglike.", "logic": "\nBicapsular(oscar)\nWinglike(nadean)\nRimy(bernette)\nClonic(carlyn)\nforall x (Bicapsular(x) and Ravishing(x) -> Clonic(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) and Rimy(x) -> Chivalrous(x))\nClonic(carlyn) -> Chivalrous(carlyn)\nforall x (Clonic(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> Ravishing(x))\nforall x (Numeric(x) and Chivalrous(x) -> Winglike(x))\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) -> Numeric(x))\nClonic(oscar) and Numeric(oscar) -> Rimy(oscar)\n\nnot Winglike(bernette)\n\nforall x (Numeric(x) and Chivalrous(x) -> Winglike(x)) <- forall x (Ravishing(x) and Rimy(x) -> Chivalrous(x)) <- forall x (Winglike(x) -> Ravishing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Clovis is taunting. Tansy is lacrimal. Saul is aversive. Dotti is calced. If someone is taunting and fiducial then they are calced. All fiducial, aversive people are somatic. If Dotti is calced then Dotti is somatic. If someone is calced then they are attendant. All lacrimal people are fiducial. Cold, somatic people are lacrimal. Round people are attendant. If Clovis is calced and Clovis is attendant then Clovis is aversive. Saul is fiducial.", "logic": "\nTaunting(clovis)\nLacrimal(tansy)\nAversive(saul)\nCalced(dotti)\nforall x (Taunting(x) and Fiducial(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Fiducial(x) and Aversive(x) -> Somatic(x))\nCalced(dotti) -> Somatic(dotti)\nforall x (Calced(x) -> Attendant(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Fiducial(x))\nforall x (Attendant(x) and Somatic(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) -> Attendant(x))\nCalced(clovis) and Attendant(clovis) -> Aversive(clovis)\n\nFiducial(saul)\n\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Fiducial(x)) <- forall x (Attendant(x) and Somatic(x) -> Lacrimal(x)) <- forall x (Fiducial(x) and Aversive(x) -> Somatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Atalanta is tilled. Ritch is necklike. Merline is bladed. Blair is shrewish. If someone is tilled and pointed then they are shrewish. All pointed, bladed people are partizan. If Blair is shrewish then Blair is partizan. If someone is shrewish then they are mordant. All necklike people are pointed. Cold, partizan people are necklike. Round people are mordant. If Atalanta is shrewish and Atalanta is mordant then Atalanta is bladed. Merline is not tilled.", "logic": "\nTilled(atalanta)\nNecklike(ritch)\nBladed(merline)\nShrewish(blair)\nforall x (Tilled(x) and Pointed(x) -> Shrewish(x))\nforall x (Pointed(x) and Bladed(x) -> Partizan(x))\nShrewish(blair) -> Partizan(blair)\nforall x (Shrewish(x) -> Mordant(x))\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Pointed(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Partizan(x) -> Necklike(x))\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> Mordant(x))\nShrewish(atalanta) and Mordant(atalanta) -> Bladed(atalanta)\n\nnot Tilled(merline)\n\nnot Tilled(merline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Nicole is cockney. Boyd is unwary. Uriel is misrelated. Kirsten is impassable. If someone is cockney and fallible then they are impassable. All fallible, misrelated people are middling. If Kirsten is impassable then Kirsten is middling. If someone is impassable then they are unattended. All unwary people are fallible. Cold, middling people are unwary. Round people are unattended. If Nicole is impassable and Nicole is unattended then Nicole is misrelated. Kirsten is cockney.", "logic": "\nCockney(nicole)\nUnwary(boyd)\nMisrelated(uriel)\nImpassable(kirsten)\nforall x (Cockney(x) and Fallible(x) -> Impassable(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Misrelated(x) -> Middling(x))\nImpassable(kirsten) -> Middling(kirsten)\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Unattended(x))\nforall x (Unwary(x) -> Fallible(x))\nforall x (Unattended(x) and Middling(x) -> Unwary(x))\nforall x (Middling(x) -> Unattended(x))\nImpassable(nicole) and Unattended(nicole) -> Misrelated(nicole)\n\nCockney(kirsten)\n\nCockney(kirsten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Jae is blended. Arden is violable. Marnia is anopheline. Riannon is shuddering. If someone is blended and lacustrine then they are shuddering. All lacustrine, anopheline people are sclerotic. If Riannon is shuddering then Riannon is sclerotic. If someone is shuddering then they are lupine. All violable people are lacustrine. Cold, sclerotic people are violable. Round people are lupine. If Jae is shuddering and Jae is lupine then Jae is anopheline. Riannon is not anopheline.", "logic": "\nBlended(jae)\nViolable(arden)\nAnopheline(marnia)\nShuddering(riannon)\nforall x (Blended(x) and Lacustrine(x) -> Shuddering(x))\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) and Anopheline(x) -> Sclerotic(x))\nShuddering(riannon) -> Sclerotic(riannon)\nforall x (Shuddering(x) -> Lupine(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) -> Lacustrine(x))\nforall x (Lupine(x) and Sclerotic(x) -> Violable(x))\nforall x (Sclerotic(x) -> Lupine(x))\nShuddering(jae) and Lupine(jae) -> Anopheline(jae)\n\nnot Anopheline(riannon)\n\nnot Anopheline(riannon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "Rivy is unlittered. Ilyse is worrisome. Avi is beforehand. Eugine is weakly. If someone is unlittered and cardboard then they are weakly. All cardboard, beforehand people are united. If Eugine is weakly then Eugine is united. If someone is weakly then they are pristine. All worrisome people are cardboard. Cold, united people are worrisome. Round people are pristine. If Rivy is weakly and Rivy is pristine then Rivy is beforehand. Ilyse is unlittered.", "logic": "\nUnlittered(rivy)\nWorrisome(ilyse)\nBeforehand(avi)\nWeakly(eugine)\nforall x (Unlittered(x) and Cardboard(x) -> Weakly(x))\nforall x (Cardboard(x) and Beforehand(x) -> United(x))\nWeakly(eugine) -> United(eugine)\nforall x (Weakly(x) -> Pristine(x))\nforall x (Worrisome(x) -> Cardboard(x))\nforall x (Pristine(x) and United(x) -> Worrisome(x))\nforall x (United(x) -> Pristine(x))\nWeakly(rivy) and Pristine(rivy) -> Beforehand(rivy)\n\nUnlittered(ilyse)\n\nUnlittered(ilyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-205"} {"premises": "The chas splay the willette. The chas fancy the willette. The chas fancy the tanny. The willette splay the chas. The willette splay the tanny. The willette fancy the tanny. The tanny is invidious. The tanny is maxi. The tanny splay the willette. The tanny instil the willette. If something is invidious and it splay the willette then it fancy the tanny. If something instil the tanny then the tanny splay the willette. If something instil the chas and it fancy the chas then it instil the willette. If something fancy the willette then it is monkish. If the willette fancy the tanny and the willette splay the chas then the chas fancy the willette. If something is invidious and it splay the willette then it fancy the tanny. If something fancy the tanny then it fancy the willette. If something fancy the tanny and it is maxi then the tanny instil the willette. The chas splay the willette.", "logic": "\nSplay(chas, willette)\nFancy(chas, willette)\nFancy(chas, tanny)\nSplay(willette, chas)\nSplay(willette, tanny)\nFancy(willette, tanny)\nInvidious(tanny)\nMaxi(tanny)\nSplay(tanny, willette)\nInstil(tanny, willette)\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Splay(x, willette) -> Fancy(x, tanny))\nforall x (Instil(x, tanny) -> Splay(tanny, willette))\nforall x (Instil(x, chas) and Fancy(x, chas) -> Instil(x, willette))\nforall x (Fancy(x, willette) -> Monkish(x))\nFancy(willette, tanny) and Splay(willette, chas) -> Fancy(chas, willette)\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Splay(x, willette) -> Fancy(x, tanny))\nforall x (Fancy(x, tanny) -> Fancy(x, willette))\nforall x (Fancy(x, tanny) and Maxi(x) -> Instil(tanny, willette))\n\nSplay(chas, willette)\n\ntherefore Splay(chas, willette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The sammy instruct the rolfe. The sammy teargas the rolfe. The sammy teargas the korney. The rolfe instruct the sammy. The rolfe instruct the korney. The rolfe teargas the korney. The korney is liverish. The korney is exoteric. The korney instruct the rolfe. The korney befuddle the rolfe. If something is liverish and it instruct the rolfe then it teargas the korney. If something befuddle the korney then the korney instruct the rolfe. If something befuddle the sammy and it teargas the sammy then it befuddle the rolfe. If something teargas the rolfe then it is nonmotile. If the rolfe teargas the korney and the rolfe instruct the sammy then the sammy teargas the rolfe. If something is liverish and it instruct the rolfe then it teargas the korney. If something teargas the korney then it teargas the rolfe. If something teargas the korney and it is exoteric then the korney befuddle the rolfe. The korney does not visit the rolfe.", "logic": "\nInstruct(sammy, rolfe)\nTeargas(sammy, rolfe)\nTeargas(sammy, korney)\nInstruct(rolfe, sammy)\nInstruct(rolfe, korney)\nTeargas(rolfe, korney)\nLiverish(korney)\nExoteric(korney)\nInstruct(korney, rolfe)\nBefuddle(korney, rolfe)\nforall x (Liverish(x) and Instruct(x, rolfe) -> Teargas(x, korney))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, korney) -> Instruct(korney, rolfe))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, sammy) and Teargas(x, sammy) -> Befuddle(x, rolfe))\nforall x (Teargas(x, rolfe) -> Nonmotile(x))\nTeargas(rolfe, korney) and Instruct(rolfe, sammy) -> Teargas(sammy, rolfe)\nforall x (Liverish(x) and Instruct(x, rolfe) -> Teargas(x, korney))\nforall x (Teargas(x, korney) -> Teargas(x, rolfe))\nforall x (Teargas(x, korney) and Exoteric(x) -> Befuddle(korney, rolfe))\n\nnot Befuddle(korney, rolfe)\n\ntherefore Befuddle(korney, rolfe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The bartie mimeograph the jilleen. The bartie recognise the jilleen. The bartie recognise the derek. The jilleen mimeograph the bartie. The jilleen mimeograph the derek. The jilleen recognise the derek. The derek is unskillful. The derek is straw. The derek mimeograph the jilleen. The derek invent the jilleen. If something is unskillful and it mimeograph the jilleen then it recognise the derek. If something invent the derek then the derek mimeograph the jilleen. If something invent the bartie and it recognise the bartie then it invent the jilleen. If something recognise the jilleen then it is slumbrous. If the jilleen recognise the derek and the jilleen mimeograph the bartie then the bartie recognise the jilleen. If something is unskillful and it mimeograph the jilleen then it recognise the derek. If something recognise the derek then it recognise the jilleen. If something recognise the derek and it is straw then the derek invent the jilleen. The jilleen recognise the jilleen.", "logic": "\nMimeograph(bartie, jilleen)\nRecognise(bartie, jilleen)\nRecognise(bartie, derek)\nMimeograph(jilleen, bartie)\nMimeograph(jilleen, derek)\nRecognise(jilleen, derek)\nUnskillful(derek)\nStraw(derek)\nMimeograph(derek, jilleen)\nInvent(derek, jilleen)\nforall x (Unskillful(x) and Mimeograph(x, jilleen) -> Recognise(x, derek))\nforall x (Invent(x, derek) -> Mimeograph(derek, jilleen))\nforall x (Invent(x, bartie) and Recognise(x, bartie) -> Invent(x, jilleen))\nforall x (Recognise(x, jilleen) -> Slumbrous(x))\nRecognise(jilleen, derek) and Mimeograph(jilleen, bartie) -> Recognise(bartie, jilleen)\nforall x (Unskillful(x) and Mimeograph(x, jilleen) -> Recognise(x, derek))\nforall x (Recognise(x, derek) -> Recognise(x, jilleen))\nforall x (Recognise(x, derek) and Straw(x) -> Invent(derek, jilleen))\n\nRecognise(jilleen, jilleen)\n\nRecognise(jilleen, derek) and forall x (Recognise(x, derek) -> Recognise(x, jilleen)) -> therefore Recognise(jilleen, jilleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The alasdair overhang the joslyn. The alasdair caucus the joslyn. The alasdair caucus the electra. The joslyn overhang the alasdair. The joslyn overhang the electra. The joslyn caucus the electra. The electra is rooted. The electra is backward. The electra overhang the joslyn. The electra vituperate the joslyn. If something is rooted and it overhang the joslyn then it caucus the electra. If something vituperate the electra then the electra overhang the joslyn. If something vituperate the alasdair and it caucus the alasdair then it vituperate the joslyn. If something caucus the joslyn then it is helmeted. If the joslyn caucus the electra and the joslyn overhang the alasdair then the alasdair caucus the joslyn. If something is rooted and it overhang the joslyn then it caucus the electra. If something caucus the electra then it caucus the joslyn. If something caucus the electra and it is backward then the electra vituperate the joslyn. The alasdair is not helmeted.", "logic": "\nOverhang(alasdair, joslyn)\nCaucus(alasdair, joslyn)\nCaucus(alasdair, electra)\nOverhang(joslyn, alasdair)\nOverhang(joslyn, electra)\nCaucus(joslyn, electra)\nRooted(electra)\nBackward(electra)\nOverhang(electra, joslyn)\nVituperate(electra, joslyn)\nforall x (Rooted(x) and Overhang(x, joslyn) -> Caucus(x, electra))\nforall x (Vituperate(x, electra) -> Overhang(electra, joslyn))\nforall x (Vituperate(x, alasdair) and Caucus(x, alasdair) -> Vituperate(x, joslyn))\nforall x (Caucus(x, joslyn) -> Helmeted(x))\nCaucus(joslyn, electra) and Overhang(joslyn, alasdair) -> Caucus(alasdair, joslyn)\nforall x (Rooted(x) and Overhang(x, joslyn) -> Caucus(x, electra))\nforall x (Caucus(x, electra) -> Caucus(x, joslyn))\nforall x (Caucus(x, electra) and Backward(x) -> Vituperate(electra, joslyn))\n\nnot Helmeted(alasdair)\n\nCaucus(alasdair, joslyn) and forall x (Caucus(x, joslyn) -> Helmeted(x)) -> therefore Helmeted(alasdair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The stefanie allot the nananne. The stefanie desiccate the nananne. The stefanie desiccate the sheffield. The nananne allot the stefanie. The nananne allot the sheffield. The nananne desiccate the sheffield. The sheffield is treacly. The sheffield is hoarse. The sheffield allot the nananne. The sheffield advertize the nananne. If something is treacly and it allot the nananne then it desiccate the sheffield. If something advertize the sheffield then the sheffield allot the nananne. If something advertize the stefanie and it desiccate the stefanie then it advertize the nananne. If something desiccate the nananne then it is backless. If the nananne desiccate the sheffield and the nananne allot the stefanie then the stefanie desiccate the nananne. If something is treacly and it allot the nananne then it desiccate the sheffield. If something desiccate the sheffield then it desiccate the nananne. If something desiccate the sheffield and it is hoarse then the sheffield advertize the nananne. The nananne is backless.", "logic": "\nAllot(stefanie, nananne)\nDesiccate(stefanie, nananne)\nDesiccate(stefanie, sheffield)\nAllot(nananne, stefanie)\nAllot(nananne, sheffield)\nDesiccate(nananne, sheffield)\nTreacly(sheffield)\nHoarse(sheffield)\nAllot(sheffield, nananne)\nAdvertize(sheffield, nananne)\nforall x (Treacly(x) and Allot(x, nananne) -> Desiccate(x, sheffield))\nforall x (Advertize(x, sheffield) -> Allot(sheffield, nananne))\nforall x (Advertize(x, stefanie) and Desiccate(x, stefanie) -> Advertize(x, nananne))\nforall x (Desiccate(x, nananne) -> Backless(x))\nDesiccate(nananne, sheffield) and Allot(nananne, stefanie) -> Desiccate(stefanie, nananne)\nforall x (Treacly(x) and Allot(x, nananne) -> Desiccate(x, sheffield))\nforall x (Desiccate(x, sheffield) -> Desiccate(x, nananne))\nforall x (Desiccate(x, sheffield) and Hoarse(x) -> Advertize(sheffield, nananne))\n\nBackless(nananne)\n\nDesiccate(nananne, sheffield) and forall x (Desiccate(x, sheffield) -> Desiccate(x, nananne)) -> therefore Desiccate(nananne, nananne) Desiccate(nananne, nananne) and forall x (Desiccate(x, nananne) -> Backless(x)) -> therefore Backless(nananne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The rudie rustle the kaari. The rudie invite the kaari. The rudie invite the marni. The kaari rustle the rudie. The kaari rustle the marni. The kaari invite the marni. The marni is wailful. The marni is advanced. The marni rustle the kaari. The marni compile the kaari. If something is wailful and it rustle the kaari then it invite the marni. If something compile the marni then the marni rustle the kaari. If something compile the rudie and it invite the rudie then it compile the kaari. If something invite the kaari then it is pasteurian. If the kaari invite the marni and the kaari rustle the rudie then the rudie invite the kaari. If something is wailful and it rustle the kaari then it invite the marni. If something invite the marni then it invite the kaari. If something invite the marni and it is advanced then the marni compile the kaari. The kaari is not pasteurian.", "logic": "\nRustle(rudie, kaari)\nInvite(rudie, kaari)\nInvite(rudie, marni)\nRustle(kaari, rudie)\nRustle(kaari, marni)\nInvite(kaari, marni)\nWailful(marni)\nAdvanced(marni)\nRustle(marni, kaari)\nCompile(marni, kaari)\nforall x (Wailful(x) and Rustle(x, kaari) -> Invite(x, marni))\nforall x (Compile(x, marni) -> Rustle(marni, kaari))\nforall x (Compile(x, rudie) and Invite(x, rudie) -> Compile(x, kaari))\nforall x (Invite(x, kaari) -> Pasteurian(x))\nInvite(kaari, marni) and Rustle(kaari, rudie) -> Invite(rudie, kaari)\nforall x (Wailful(x) and Rustle(x, kaari) -> Invite(x, marni))\nforall x (Invite(x, marni) -> Invite(x, kaari))\nforall x (Invite(x, marni) and Advanced(x) -> Compile(marni, kaari))\n\nnot Pasteurian(kaari)\n\nInvite(kaari, marni) and forall x (Invite(x, marni) -> Invite(x, kaari)) -> therefore Invite(kaari, kaari) Invite(kaari, kaari) and forall x (Invite(x, kaari) -> Pasteurian(x)) -> therefore Pasteurian(kaari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The carmella racketeer the cody. The carmella polemicise the cody. The carmella polemicise the muriel. The cody racketeer the carmella. The cody racketeer the muriel. The cody polemicise the muriel. The muriel is napoleonic. The muriel is sincere. The muriel racketeer the cody. The muriel retract the cody. If something is napoleonic and it racketeer the cody then it polemicise the muriel. If something retract the muriel then the muriel racketeer the cody. If something retract the carmella and it polemicise the carmella then it retract the cody. If something polemicise the cody then it is altissimo. If the cody polemicise the muriel and the cody racketeer the carmella then the carmella polemicise the cody. If something is napoleonic and it racketeer the cody then it polemicise the muriel. If something polemicise the muriel then it polemicise the cody. If something polemicise the muriel and it is sincere then the muriel retract the cody. The muriel is altissimo.", "logic": "\nRacketeer(carmella, cody)\nPolemicise(carmella, cody)\nPolemicise(carmella, muriel)\nRacketeer(cody, carmella)\nRacketeer(cody, muriel)\nPolemicise(cody, muriel)\nNapoleonic(muriel)\nSincere(muriel)\nRacketeer(muriel, cody)\nRetract(muriel, cody)\nforall x (Napoleonic(x) and Racketeer(x, cody) -> Polemicise(x, muriel))\nforall x (Retract(x, muriel) -> Racketeer(muriel, cody))\nforall x (Retract(x, carmella) and Polemicise(x, carmella) -> Retract(x, cody))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, cody) -> Altissimo(x))\nPolemicise(cody, muriel) and Racketeer(cody, carmella) -> Polemicise(carmella, cody)\nforall x (Napoleonic(x) and Racketeer(x, cody) -> Polemicise(x, muriel))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, muriel) -> Polemicise(x, cody))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, muriel) and Sincere(x) -> Retract(muriel, cody))\n\nAltissimo(muriel)\n\nNapoleonic(muriel) and Racketeer(muriel, cody) and forall x (Napoleonic(x) and Racketeer(x, cody) -> Polemicise(x, muriel)) -> therefore Polemicise(muriel, muriel) Polemicise(muriel, muriel) and forall x (Polemicise(x, muriel) -> Polemicise(x, cody)) -> therefore Polemicise(muriel, cody) Polemicise(muriel, cody) and forall x (Polemicise(x, cody) -> Altissimo(x)) -> therefore Altissimo(muriel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The lucian unsay the gayla. The lucian privatize the gayla. The lucian privatize the peria. The gayla unsay the lucian. The gayla unsay the peria. The gayla privatize the peria. The peria is princely. The peria is loco. The peria unsay the gayla. The peria rephrase the gayla. If something is princely and it unsay the gayla then it privatize the peria. If something rephrase the peria then the peria unsay the gayla. If something rephrase the lucian and it privatize the lucian then it rephrase the gayla. If something privatize the gayla then it is comose. If the gayla privatize the peria and the gayla unsay the lucian then the lucian privatize the gayla. If something is princely and it unsay the gayla then it privatize the peria. If something privatize the peria then it privatize the gayla. If something privatize the peria and it is loco then the peria rephrase the gayla. The peria is not comose.", "logic": "\nUnsay(lucian, gayla)\nPrivatize(lucian, gayla)\nPrivatize(lucian, peria)\nUnsay(gayla, lucian)\nUnsay(gayla, peria)\nPrivatize(gayla, peria)\nPrincely(peria)\nLoco(peria)\nUnsay(peria, gayla)\nRephrase(peria, gayla)\nforall x (Princely(x) and Unsay(x, gayla) -> Privatize(x, peria))\nforall x (Rephrase(x, peria) -> Unsay(peria, gayla))\nforall x (Rephrase(x, lucian) and Privatize(x, lucian) -> Rephrase(x, gayla))\nforall x (Privatize(x, gayla) -> Comose(x))\nPrivatize(gayla, peria) and Unsay(gayla, lucian) -> Privatize(lucian, gayla)\nforall x (Princely(x) and Unsay(x, gayla) -> Privatize(x, peria))\nforall x (Privatize(x, peria) -> Privatize(x, gayla))\nforall x (Privatize(x, peria) and Loco(x) -> Rephrase(peria, gayla))\n\nnot Comose(peria)\n\nPrincely(peria) and Unsay(peria, gayla) and forall x (Princely(x) and Unsay(x, gayla) -> Privatize(x, peria)) -> therefore Privatize(peria, peria) Privatize(peria, peria) and forall x (Privatize(x, peria) -> Privatize(x, gayla)) -> therefore Privatize(peria, gayla) Privatize(peria, gayla) and forall x (Privatize(x, gayla) -> Comose(x)) -> therefore Comose(peria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The gelya holler the toddy. The gelya mush the toddy. The gelya mush the kelvin. The toddy holler the gelya. The toddy holler the kelvin. The toddy mush the kelvin. The kelvin is nifty. The kelvin is ataxic. The kelvin holler the toddy. The kelvin flex the toddy. If something is nifty and it holler the toddy then it mush the kelvin. If something flex the kelvin then the kelvin holler the toddy. If something flex the gelya and it mush the gelya then it flex the toddy. If something mush the toddy then it is debonaire. If the toddy mush the kelvin and the toddy holler the gelya then the gelya mush the toddy. If something is nifty and it holler the toddy then it mush the kelvin. If something mush the kelvin then it mush the toddy. If something mush the kelvin and it is ataxic then the kelvin flex the toddy. The toddy does not visit the toddy.", "logic": "\nHoller(gelya, toddy)\nMush(gelya, toddy)\nMush(gelya, kelvin)\nHoller(toddy, gelya)\nHoller(toddy, kelvin)\nMush(toddy, kelvin)\nNifty(kelvin)\nAtaxic(kelvin)\nHoller(kelvin, toddy)\nFlex(kelvin, toddy)\nforall x (Nifty(x) and Holler(x, toddy) -> Mush(x, kelvin))\nforall x (Flex(x, kelvin) -> Holler(kelvin, toddy))\nforall x (Flex(x, gelya) and Mush(x, gelya) -> Flex(x, toddy))\nforall x (Mush(x, toddy) -> Debonaire(x))\nMush(toddy, kelvin) and Holler(toddy, gelya) -> Mush(gelya, toddy)\nforall x (Nifty(x) and Holler(x, toddy) -> Mush(x, kelvin))\nforall x (Mush(x, kelvin) -> Mush(x, toddy))\nforall x (Mush(x, kelvin) and Ataxic(x) -> Flex(kelvin, toddy))\n\nnot Flex(toddy, toddy)\n\nforall x (Flex(x, gelya) and Mush(x, gelya) -> Flex(x, toddy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The sheffy resize the anton. The sheffy humanise the anton. The sheffy humanise the garnette. The anton resize the sheffy. The anton resize the garnette. The anton humanise the garnette. The garnette is imploring. The garnette is rangy. The garnette resize the anton. The garnette monetise the anton. If something is imploring and it resize the anton then it humanise the garnette. If something monetise the garnette then the garnette resize the anton. If something monetise the sheffy and it humanise the sheffy then it monetise the anton. If something humanise the anton then it is cultural. If the anton humanise the garnette and the anton resize the sheffy then the sheffy humanise the anton. If something is imploring and it resize the anton then it humanise the garnette. If something humanise the garnette then it humanise the anton. If something humanise the garnette and it is rangy then the garnette monetise the anton. The sheffy monetise the anton.", "logic": "\nResize(sheffy, anton)\nHumanise(sheffy, anton)\nHumanise(sheffy, garnette)\nResize(anton, sheffy)\nResize(anton, garnette)\nHumanise(anton, garnette)\nImploring(garnette)\nRangy(garnette)\nResize(garnette, anton)\nMonetise(garnette, anton)\nforall x (Imploring(x) and Resize(x, anton) -> Humanise(x, garnette))\nforall x (Monetise(x, garnette) -> Resize(garnette, anton))\nforall x (Monetise(x, sheffy) and Humanise(x, sheffy) -> Monetise(x, anton))\nforall x (Humanise(x, anton) -> Cultural(x))\nHumanise(anton, garnette) and Resize(anton, sheffy) -> Humanise(sheffy, anton)\nforall x (Imploring(x) and Resize(x, anton) -> Humanise(x, garnette))\nforall x (Humanise(x, garnette) -> Humanise(x, anton))\nforall x (Humanise(x, garnette) and Rangy(x) -> Monetise(garnette, anton))\n\nMonetise(sheffy, anton)\n\nforall x (Monetise(x, sheffy) and Humanise(x, sheffy) -> Monetise(x, anton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The lyndy mothball the glenine. The lyndy surpass the glenine. The lyndy surpass the davie. The glenine mothball the lyndy. The glenine mothball the davie. The glenine surpass the davie. The davie is refreshing. The davie is unvented. The davie mothball the glenine. The davie categorise the glenine. If something is refreshing and it mothball the glenine then it surpass the davie. If something categorise the davie then the davie mothball the glenine. If something categorise the lyndy and it surpass the lyndy then it categorise the glenine. If something surpass the glenine then it is extramural. If the glenine surpass the davie and the glenine mothball the lyndy then the lyndy surpass the glenine. If something is refreshing and it mothball the glenine then it surpass the davie. If something surpass the davie then it surpass the glenine. If something surpass the davie and it is unvented then the davie categorise the glenine. The glenine does not visit the lyndy.", "logic": "\nMothball(lyndy, glenine)\nSurpass(lyndy, glenine)\nSurpass(lyndy, davie)\nMothball(glenine, lyndy)\nMothball(glenine, davie)\nSurpass(glenine, davie)\nRefreshing(davie)\nUnvented(davie)\nMothball(davie, glenine)\nCategorise(davie, glenine)\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and Mothball(x, glenine) -> Surpass(x, davie))\nforall x (Categorise(x, davie) -> Mothball(davie, glenine))\nforall x (Categorise(x, lyndy) and Surpass(x, lyndy) -> Categorise(x, glenine))\nforall x (Surpass(x, glenine) -> Extramural(x))\nSurpass(glenine, davie) and Mothball(glenine, lyndy) -> Surpass(lyndy, glenine)\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and Mothball(x, glenine) -> Surpass(x, davie))\nforall x (Surpass(x, davie) -> Surpass(x, glenine))\nforall x (Surpass(x, davie) and Unvented(x) -> Categorise(davie, glenine))\n\nnot Categorise(glenine, lyndy)\n\nnot Categorise(glenine, lyndy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The evangelia subvert the gabriela. The evangelia reinsure the gabriela. The evangelia reinsure the salli. The gabriela subvert the evangelia. The gabriela subvert the salli. The gabriela reinsure the salli. The salli is held. The salli is tarsal. The salli subvert the gabriela. The salli goldbrick the gabriela. If something is held and it subvert the gabriela then it reinsure the salli. If something goldbrick the salli then the salli subvert the gabriela. If something goldbrick the evangelia and it reinsure the evangelia then it goldbrick the gabriela. If something reinsure the gabriela then it is laureate. If the gabriela reinsure the salli and the gabriela subvert the evangelia then the evangelia reinsure the gabriela. If something is held and it subvert the gabriela then it reinsure the salli. If something reinsure the salli then it reinsure the gabriela. If something reinsure the salli and it is tarsal then the salli goldbrick the gabriela. The salli subvert the salli.", "logic": "\nSubvert(evangelia, gabriela)\nReinsure(evangelia, gabriela)\nReinsure(evangelia, salli)\nSubvert(gabriela, evangelia)\nSubvert(gabriela, salli)\nReinsure(gabriela, salli)\nHeld(salli)\nTarsal(salli)\nSubvert(salli, gabriela)\nGoldbrick(salli, gabriela)\nforall x (Held(x) and Subvert(x, gabriela) -> Reinsure(x, salli))\nforall x (Goldbrick(x, salli) -> Subvert(salli, gabriela))\nforall x (Goldbrick(x, evangelia) and Reinsure(x, evangelia) -> Goldbrick(x, gabriela))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, gabriela) -> Laureate(x))\nReinsure(gabriela, salli) and Subvert(gabriela, evangelia) -> Reinsure(evangelia, gabriela)\nforall x (Held(x) and Subvert(x, gabriela) -> Reinsure(x, salli))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, salli) -> Reinsure(x, gabriela))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, salli) and Tarsal(x) -> Goldbrick(salli, gabriela))\n\nSubvert(salli, salli)\n\nSubvert(salli, salli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The jaime gamble the emylee. The jaime budget the emylee. The jaime budget the rayshell. The emylee gamble the jaime. The emylee gamble the rayshell. The emylee budget the rayshell. The rayshell is definitive. The rayshell is ignitible. The rayshell gamble the emylee. The rayshell discerp the emylee. If something is definitive and it gamble the emylee then it budget the rayshell. If something discerp the rayshell then the rayshell gamble the emylee. If something discerp the jaime and it budget the jaime then it discerp the emylee. If something budget the emylee then it is unbeatable. If the emylee budget the rayshell and the emylee gamble the jaime then the jaime budget the emylee. If something is definitive and it gamble the emylee then it budget the rayshell. If something budget the rayshell then it budget the emylee. If something budget the rayshell and it is ignitible then the rayshell discerp the emylee. The rayshell does not see the jaime.", "logic": "\nGamble(jaime, emylee)\nBudget(jaime, emylee)\nBudget(jaime, rayshell)\nGamble(emylee, jaime)\nGamble(emylee, rayshell)\nBudget(emylee, rayshell)\nDefinitive(rayshell)\nIgnitible(rayshell)\nGamble(rayshell, emylee)\nDiscerp(rayshell, emylee)\nforall x (Definitive(x) and Gamble(x, emylee) -> Budget(x, rayshell))\nforall x (Discerp(x, rayshell) -> Gamble(rayshell, emylee))\nforall x (Discerp(x, jaime) and Budget(x, jaime) -> Discerp(x, emylee))\nforall x (Budget(x, emylee) -> Unbeatable(x))\nBudget(emylee, rayshell) and Gamble(emylee, jaime) -> Budget(jaime, emylee)\nforall x (Definitive(x) and Gamble(x, emylee) -> Budget(x, rayshell))\nforall x (Budget(x, rayshell) -> Budget(x, emylee))\nforall x (Budget(x, rayshell) and Ignitible(x) -> Discerp(rayshell, emylee))\n\nnot Budget(rayshell, jaime)\n\nnot Budget(rayshell, jaime) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The dian analyse the ricki. The dian avalanche the ricki. The dian avalanche the eolande. The ricki analyse the dian. The ricki analyse the eolande. The ricki avalanche the eolande. The eolande is exoteric. The eolande is prosaic. The eolande analyse the ricki. The eolande dulcify the ricki. If something is exoteric and it analyse the ricki then it avalanche the eolande. If something dulcify the eolande then the eolande analyse the ricki. If something dulcify the dian and it avalanche the dian then it dulcify the ricki. If something avalanche the ricki then it is schoolwide. If the ricki avalanche the eolande and the ricki analyse the dian then the dian avalanche the ricki. If something is exoteric and it analyse the ricki then it avalanche the eolande. If something avalanche the eolande then it avalanche the ricki. If something avalanche the eolande and it is prosaic then the eolande dulcify the ricki. The dian is kind.", "logic": "\nAnalyse(dian, ricki)\nAvalanche(dian, ricki)\nAvalanche(dian, eolande)\nAnalyse(ricki, dian)\nAnalyse(ricki, eolande)\nAvalanche(ricki, eolande)\nExoteric(eolande)\nProsaic(eolande)\nAnalyse(eolande, ricki)\nDulcify(eolande, ricki)\nforall x (Exoteric(x) and Analyse(x, ricki) -> Avalanche(x, eolande))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, eolande) -> Analyse(eolande, ricki))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, dian) and Avalanche(x, dian) -> Dulcify(x, ricki))\nforall x (Avalanche(x, ricki) -> Schoolwide(x))\nAvalanche(ricki, eolande) and Analyse(ricki, dian) -> Avalanche(dian, ricki)\nforall x (Exoteric(x) and Analyse(x, ricki) -> Avalanche(x, eolande))\nforall x (Avalanche(x, eolande) -> Avalanche(x, ricki))\nforall x (Avalanche(x, eolande) and Prosaic(x) -> Dulcify(eolande, ricki))\n\nKind(dian)\n\nKind(dian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The filippa fluoresce the tarrance. The filippa junketeer the tarrance. The filippa junketeer the lemar. The tarrance fluoresce the filippa. The tarrance fluoresce the lemar. The tarrance junketeer the lemar. The lemar is elegiac. The lemar is acoustical. The lemar fluoresce the tarrance. The lemar exacerbate the tarrance. If something is elegiac and it fluoresce the tarrance then it junketeer the lemar. If something exacerbate the lemar then the lemar fluoresce the tarrance. If something exacerbate the filippa and it junketeer the filippa then it exacerbate the tarrance. If something junketeer the tarrance then it is jamesian. If the tarrance junketeer the lemar and the tarrance fluoresce the filippa then the filippa junketeer the tarrance. If something is elegiac and it fluoresce the tarrance then it junketeer the lemar. If something junketeer the lemar then it junketeer the tarrance. If something junketeer the lemar and it is acoustical then the lemar exacerbate the tarrance. The lemar is not rough.", "logic": "\nFluoresce(filippa, tarrance)\nJunketeer(filippa, tarrance)\nJunketeer(filippa, lemar)\nFluoresce(tarrance, filippa)\nFluoresce(tarrance, lemar)\nJunketeer(tarrance, lemar)\nElegiac(lemar)\nAcoustical(lemar)\nFluoresce(lemar, tarrance)\nExacerbate(lemar, tarrance)\nforall x (Elegiac(x) and Fluoresce(x, tarrance) -> Junketeer(x, lemar))\nforall x (Exacerbate(x, lemar) -> Fluoresce(lemar, tarrance))\nforall x (Exacerbate(x, filippa) and Junketeer(x, filippa) -> Exacerbate(x, tarrance))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, tarrance) -> Jamesian(x))\nJunketeer(tarrance, lemar) and Fluoresce(tarrance, filippa) -> Junketeer(filippa, tarrance)\nforall x (Elegiac(x) and Fluoresce(x, tarrance) -> Junketeer(x, lemar))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, lemar) -> Junketeer(x, tarrance))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, lemar) and Acoustical(x) -> Exacerbate(lemar, tarrance))\n\nnot Rough(lemar)\n\nnot Rough(lemar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The jonny liberalise the bartlet. The jonny nitpick the bartlet. The jonny nitpick the garwood. The bartlet liberalise the jonny. The bartlet liberalise the garwood. The bartlet nitpick the garwood. The garwood is septate. The garwood is biddable. The garwood liberalise the bartlet. The garwood sanitise the bartlet. If something is septate and it liberalise the bartlet then it nitpick the garwood. If something sanitise the garwood then the garwood liberalise the bartlet. If something sanitise the jonny and it nitpick the jonny then it sanitise the bartlet. If something nitpick the bartlet then it is unassuming. If the bartlet nitpick the garwood and the bartlet liberalise the jonny then the jonny nitpick the bartlet. If something is septate and it liberalise the bartlet then it nitpick the garwood. If something nitpick the garwood then it nitpick the bartlet. If something nitpick the garwood and it is biddable then the garwood sanitise the bartlet. The garwood liberalise the jonny.", "logic": "\nLiberalise(jonny, bartlet)\nNitpick(jonny, bartlet)\nNitpick(jonny, garwood)\nLiberalise(bartlet, jonny)\nLiberalise(bartlet, garwood)\nNitpick(bartlet, garwood)\nSeptate(garwood)\nBiddable(garwood)\nLiberalise(garwood, bartlet)\nSanitise(garwood, bartlet)\nforall x (Septate(x) and Liberalise(x, bartlet) -> Nitpick(x, garwood))\nforall x (Sanitise(x, garwood) -> Liberalise(garwood, bartlet))\nforall x (Sanitise(x, jonny) and Nitpick(x, jonny) -> Sanitise(x, bartlet))\nforall x (Nitpick(x, bartlet) -> Unassuming(x))\nNitpick(bartlet, garwood) and Liberalise(bartlet, jonny) -> Nitpick(jonny, bartlet)\nforall x (Septate(x) and Liberalise(x, bartlet) -> Nitpick(x, garwood))\nforall x (Nitpick(x, garwood) -> Nitpick(x, bartlet))\nforall x (Nitpick(x, garwood) and Biddable(x) -> Sanitise(garwood, bartlet))\n\nLiberalise(garwood, jonny)\n\nLiberalise(garwood, jonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1401"} {"premises": "The rees is unscripted. The rees is reddened. The rees is quaternate. If the rees is proof then the rees is hurried. All quaternate, unscripted people are proof. Kind, unscripted people are quaternate. The rees is reddened.", "logic": "\nUnscripted(rees)\nReddened(rees)\nQuaternate(rees)\nProof(rees) -> Hurried(rees)\nforall x (Quaternate(x) and Unscripted(x) -> Proof(x))\nforall x (Reddened(x) and Unscripted(x) -> Quaternate(x))\n\nReddened(rees)\n\ntherefore Reddened(rees)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The gerty is atrocious. The gerty is bugged. The gerty is geocentric. If the gerty is poky then the gerty is amharic. All geocentric, atrocious people are poky. Kind, atrocious people are geocentric. The gerty is not bugged.", "logic": "\nAtrocious(gerty)\nBugged(gerty)\nGeocentric(gerty)\nPoky(gerty) -> Amharic(gerty)\nforall x (Geocentric(x) and Atrocious(x) -> Poky(x))\nforall x (Bugged(x) and Atrocious(x) -> Geocentric(x))\n\nnot Bugged(gerty)\n\ntherefore Bugged(gerty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The elfreda is imitative. The elfreda is catchy. The elfreda is polynesian. If the elfreda is colourless then the elfreda is diligent. All polynesian, imitative people are colourless. Kind, imitative people are polynesian. The elfreda is colourless.", "logic": "\nImitative(elfreda)\nCatchy(elfreda)\nPolynesian(elfreda)\nColourless(elfreda) -> Diligent(elfreda)\nforall x (Polynesian(x) and Imitative(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and Imitative(x) -> Polynesian(x))\n\nColourless(elfreda)\n\nPolynesian(elfreda) and Imitative(elfreda) and forall x (Polynesian(x) and Imitative(x) -> Colourless(x)) -> therefore Colourless(elfreda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The martita is copernican. The martita is briefless. The martita is outre. If the martita is scant then the martita is champion. All outre, copernican people are scant. Kind, copernican people are outre. The martita is not scant.", "logic": "\nCopernican(martita)\nBriefless(martita)\nOutre(martita)\nScant(martita) -> Champion(martita)\nforall x (Outre(x) and Copernican(x) -> Scant(x))\nforall x (Briefless(x) and Copernican(x) -> Outre(x))\n\nnot Scant(martita)\n\nOutre(martita) and Copernican(martita) and forall x (Outre(x) and Copernican(x) -> Scant(x)) -> therefore Scant(martita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The garland is twoscore. The garland is pernicious. The garland is seasoned. If the garland is livid then the garland is upmost. All seasoned, twoscore people are livid. Kind, twoscore people are seasoned. The garland is upmost.", "logic": "\nTwoscore(garland)\nPernicious(garland)\nSeasoned(garland)\nLivid(garland) -> Upmost(garland)\nforall x (Seasoned(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Livid(x))\nforall x (Pernicious(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Seasoned(x))\n\nUpmost(garland)\n\nSeasoned(garland) and Twoscore(garland) and forall x (Seasoned(x) and Twoscore(x) -> Livid(x)) -> therefore Livid(garland) Livid(garland) and Livid(garland) -> Upmost(garland) -> therefore Upmost(garland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The robb is employed. The robb is decurved. The robb is untanned. If the robb is monogenic then the robb is mithraic. All untanned, employed people are monogenic. Kind, employed people are untanned. The robb is not mithraic.", "logic": "\nEmployed(robb)\nDecurved(robb)\nUntanned(robb)\nMonogenic(robb) -> Mithraic(robb)\nforall x (Untanned(x) and Employed(x) -> Monogenic(x))\nforall x (Decurved(x) and Employed(x) -> Untanned(x))\n\nnot Mithraic(robb)\n\nUntanned(robb) and Employed(robb) and forall x (Untanned(x) and Employed(x) -> Monogenic(x)) -> therefore Monogenic(robb) Monogenic(robb) and Monogenic(robb) -> Mithraic(robb) -> therefore Mithraic(robb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The shantee is fiendish. The shantee is boorish. The shantee is distant. If the shantee is clinking then the shantee is ergotic. All distant, fiendish people are clinking. Kind, fiendish people are distant. The shantee does not see the shantee.", "logic": "\nFiendish(shantee)\nBoorish(shantee)\nDistant(shantee)\nClinking(shantee) -> Ergotic(shantee)\nforall x (Distant(x) and Fiendish(x) -> Clinking(x))\nforall x (Boorish(x) and Fiendish(x) -> Distant(x))\n\nnot Sees(shantee, shantee)\n\nnot Sees(shantee, shantee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The sal is desecrated. The sal is vaporized. The sal is synoicous. If the sal is formalized then the sal is nipponese. All synoicous, desecrated people are formalized. Kind, desecrated people are synoicous. The sal needs the sal.", "logic": "\nDesecrated(sal)\nVaporized(sal)\nSynoicous(sal)\nFormalized(sal) -> Nipponese(sal)\nforall x (Synoicous(x) and Desecrated(x) -> Formalized(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) and Desecrated(x) -> Synoicous(x))\n\nNeeds(sal, sal)\n\nNeeds(sal, sal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1096"} {"premises": "The dee is chaffy. The dee simonise the giuseppe. The dee simonise the hayden. The page is chaffy. The page does not see the giuseppe. The page does not see the hayden. The giuseppe opsonize the hayden. The giuseppe is venetian. The giuseppe is blurry. The hayden reign the page. If something opsonize the giuseppe and the giuseppe does not eat the hayden then the giuseppe simonise the dee. If the hayden opsonize the page then the page reign the hayden. If something is chaffy then it is venetian. All champleve things are chaffy. If something simonise the hayden then the hayden is champleve. If something simonise the hayden then the hayden does not need the giuseppe. The giuseppe is venetian.", "logic": "\nChaffy(dee)\nSimonise(dee, giuseppe)\nSimonise(dee, hayden)\nChaffy(page)\nnot Reign(page, giuseppe)\nnot Reign(page, hayden)\nOpsonize(giuseppe, hayden)\nVenetian(giuseppe)\nBlurry(giuseppe)\nReign(hayden, page)\nforall x (Opsonize(x, giuseppe) and not Opsonize(giuseppe, hayden) -> Simonise(giuseppe, dee))\nOpsonize(hayden, page) -> Reign(page, hayden)\nforall x (Chaffy(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Chaffy(x))\nforall x (Simonise(x, hayden) -> Champleve(hayden))\nforall x (Simonise(x, hayden) -> not Simonise(hayden, giuseppe))\n\nVenetian(giuseppe)\n\ntherefore Venetian(giuseppe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The lorianne is slaked. The lorianne defalcate the waldemar. The lorianne defalcate the edeline. The zacharia is slaked. The zacharia does not see the waldemar. The zacharia does not see the edeline. The waldemar unlive the edeline. The waldemar is cursed. The waldemar is malthusian. The edeline pout the zacharia. If something unlive the waldemar and the waldemar does not eat the edeline then the waldemar defalcate the lorianne. If the edeline unlive the zacharia then the zacharia pout the edeline. If something is slaked then it is cursed. All oriented things are slaked. If something defalcate the edeline then the edeline is oriented. If something defalcate the edeline then the edeline does not need the waldemar. The waldemar is not cursed.", "logic": "\nSlaked(lorianne)\nDefalcate(lorianne, waldemar)\nDefalcate(lorianne, edeline)\nSlaked(zacharia)\nnot Pout(zacharia, waldemar)\nnot Pout(zacharia, edeline)\nUnlive(waldemar, edeline)\nCursed(waldemar)\nMalthusian(waldemar)\nPout(edeline, zacharia)\nforall x (Unlive(x, waldemar) and not Unlive(waldemar, edeline) -> Defalcate(waldemar, lorianne))\nUnlive(edeline, zacharia) -> Pout(zacharia, edeline)\nforall x (Slaked(x) -> Cursed(x))\nforall x (Oriented(x) -> Slaked(x))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, edeline) -> Oriented(edeline))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, edeline) -> not Defalcate(edeline, waldemar))\n\nnot Cursed(waldemar)\n\ntherefore Cursed(waldemar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The floyd is depleted. The floyd sieve the maxie. The floyd sieve the bridie. The bertina is depleted. The bertina does not see the maxie. The bertina does not see the bridie. The maxie retouch the bridie. The maxie is pictured. The maxie is uplifted. The bridie gestate the bertina. If something retouch the maxie and the maxie does not eat the bridie then the maxie sieve the floyd. If the bridie retouch the bertina then the bertina gestate the bridie. If something is depleted then it is pictured. All unfertile things are depleted. If something sieve the bridie then the bridie is unfertile. If something sieve the bridie then the bridie does not need the maxie. The bridie does not need the maxie.", "logic": "\nDepleted(floyd)\nSieve(floyd, maxie)\nSieve(floyd, bridie)\nDepleted(bertina)\nnot Gestate(bertina, maxie)\nnot Gestate(bertina, bridie)\nRetouch(maxie, bridie)\nPictured(maxie)\nUplifted(maxie)\nGestate(bridie, bertina)\nforall x (Retouch(x, maxie) and not Retouch(maxie, bridie) -> Sieve(maxie, floyd))\nRetouch(bridie, bertina) -> Gestate(bertina, bridie)\nforall x (Depleted(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Unfertile(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Sieve(x, bridie) -> Unfertile(bridie))\nforall x (Sieve(x, bridie) -> not Sieve(bridie, maxie))\n\nnot Sieve(bridie, maxie)\n\nSieve(floyd, bridie) and forall x (Sieve(x, bridie) -> not Sieve(bridie, maxie)) -> therefore not Sieve(bridie, maxie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The ronna is peruvian. The ronna ritualize the rozella. The ronna ritualize the aloysius. The dwayne is peruvian. The dwayne does not see the rozella. The dwayne does not see the aloysius. The rozella upgrade the aloysius. The rozella is alabaster. The rozella is jolly. The aloysius lithograph the dwayne. If something upgrade the rozella and the rozella does not eat the aloysius then the rozella ritualize the ronna. If the aloysius upgrade the dwayne then the dwayne lithograph the aloysius. If something is peruvian then it is alabaster. All lapidary things are peruvian. If something ritualize the aloysius then the aloysius is lapidary. If something ritualize the aloysius then the aloysius does not need the rozella. The aloysius is not lapidary.", "logic": "\nPeruvian(ronna)\nRitualize(ronna, rozella)\nRitualize(ronna, aloysius)\nPeruvian(dwayne)\nnot Lithograph(dwayne, rozella)\nnot Lithograph(dwayne, aloysius)\nUpgrade(rozella, aloysius)\nAlabaster(rozella)\nJolly(rozella)\nLithograph(aloysius, dwayne)\nforall x (Upgrade(x, rozella) and not Upgrade(rozella, aloysius) -> Ritualize(rozella, ronna))\nUpgrade(aloysius, dwayne) -> Lithograph(dwayne, aloysius)\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> Alabaster(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) -> Peruvian(x))\nforall x (Ritualize(x, aloysius) -> Lapidary(aloysius))\nforall x (Ritualize(x, aloysius) -> not Ritualize(aloysius, rozella))\n\nnot Lapidary(aloysius)\n\nRitualize(ronna, aloysius) and forall x (Ritualize(x, aloysius) -> Lapidary(aloysius)) -> therefore Lapidary(aloysius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The auria is unlaureled. The auria deplume the candra. The auria deplume the heath. The odelinda is unlaureled. The odelinda does not see the candra. The odelinda does not see the heath. The candra seize the heath. The candra is dejected. The candra is historical. The heath stucco the odelinda. If something seize the candra and the candra does not eat the heath then the candra deplume the auria. If the heath seize the odelinda then the odelinda stucco the heath. If something is unlaureled then it is dejected. All persistent things are unlaureled. If something deplume the heath then the heath is persistent. If something deplume the heath then the heath does not need the candra. The heath is unlaureled.", "logic": "\nUnlaureled(auria)\nDeplume(auria, candra)\nDeplume(auria, heath)\nUnlaureled(odelinda)\nnot Stucco(odelinda, candra)\nnot Stucco(odelinda, heath)\nSeize(candra, heath)\nDejected(candra)\nHistorical(candra)\nStucco(heath, odelinda)\nforall x (Seize(x, candra) and not Seize(candra, heath) -> Deplume(candra, auria))\nSeize(heath, odelinda) -> Stucco(odelinda, heath)\nforall x (Unlaureled(x) -> Dejected(x))\nforall x (Persistent(x) -> Unlaureled(x))\nforall x (Deplume(x, heath) -> Persistent(heath))\nforall x (Deplume(x, heath) -> not Deplume(heath, candra))\n\nUnlaureled(heath)\n\nDeplume(auria, heath) and forall x (Deplume(x, heath) -> Persistent(heath)) -> therefore Persistent(heath) Persistent(heath) and forall x (Persistent(x) -> Unlaureled(x)) -> therefore Unlaureled(heath)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The jaclyn is hindering. The jaclyn hire the ramonda. The jaclyn hire the kiley. The bart is hindering. The bart does not see the ramonda. The bart does not see the kiley. The ramonda hole the kiley. The ramonda is niggardly. The ramonda is clamant. The kiley symbolize the bart. If something hole the ramonda and the ramonda does not eat the kiley then the ramonda hire the jaclyn. If the kiley hole the bart then the bart symbolize the kiley. If something is hindering then it is niggardly. All choppy things are hindering. If something hire the kiley then the kiley is choppy. If something hire the kiley then the kiley does not need the ramonda. The kiley is not hindering.", "logic": "\nHindering(jaclyn)\nHire(jaclyn, ramonda)\nHire(jaclyn, kiley)\nHindering(bart)\nnot Symbolize(bart, ramonda)\nnot Symbolize(bart, kiley)\nHole(ramonda, kiley)\nNiggardly(ramonda)\nClamant(ramonda)\nSymbolize(kiley, bart)\nforall x (Hole(x, ramonda) and not Hole(ramonda, kiley) -> Hire(ramonda, jaclyn))\nHole(kiley, bart) -> Symbolize(bart, kiley)\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Niggardly(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Hindering(x))\nforall x (Hire(x, kiley) -> Choppy(kiley))\nforall x (Hire(x, kiley) -> not Hire(kiley, ramonda))\n\nnot Hindering(kiley)\n\nHire(jaclyn, kiley) and forall x (Hire(x, kiley) -> Choppy(kiley)) -> therefore Choppy(kiley) Choppy(kiley) and forall x (Choppy(x) -> Hindering(x)) -> therefore Hindering(kiley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The aditya is animating. The aditya downgrade the roni. The aditya downgrade the odin. The lyndy is animating. The lyndy does not see the roni. The lyndy does not see the odin. The roni blink the odin. The roni is undressed. The roni is fourth. The odin uphold the lyndy. If something blink the roni and the roni does not eat the odin then the roni downgrade the aditya. If the odin blink the lyndy then the lyndy uphold the odin. If something is animating then it is undressed. All tortured things are animating. If something downgrade the odin then the odin is tortured. If something downgrade the odin then the odin does not need the roni. The odin is undressed.", "logic": "\nAnimating(aditya)\nDowngrade(aditya, roni)\nDowngrade(aditya, odin)\nAnimating(lyndy)\nnot Uphold(lyndy, roni)\nnot Uphold(lyndy, odin)\nBlink(roni, odin)\nUndressed(roni)\nFourth(roni)\nUphold(odin, lyndy)\nforall x (Blink(x, roni) and not Blink(roni, odin) -> Downgrade(roni, aditya))\nBlink(odin, lyndy) -> Uphold(lyndy, odin)\nforall x (Animating(x) -> Undressed(x))\nforall x (Tortured(x) -> Animating(x))\nforall x (Downgrade(x, odin) -> Tortured(odin))\nforall x (Downgrade(x, odin) -> not Downgrade(odin, roni))\n\nUndressed(odin)\n\nDowngrade(aditya, odin) and forall x (Downgrade(x, odin) -> Tortured(odin)) -> therefore Tortured(odin) Tortured(odin) and forall x (Tortured(x) -> Animating(x)) -> therefore Animating(odin) Animating(odin) and forall x (Animating(x) -> Undressed(x)) -> therefore Undressed(odin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The joanie is goethean. The joanie yaup the wren. The joanie yaup the eleanora. The amie is goethean. The amie does not see the wren. The amie does not see the eleanora. The wren raffle the eleanora. The wren is congealed. The wren is polyoicous. The eleanora wreck the amie. If something raffle the wren and the wren does not eat the eleanora then the wren yaup the joanie. If the eleanora raffle the amie then the amie wreck the eleanora. If something is goethean then it is congealed. All slangy things are goethean. If something yaup the eleanora then the eleanora is slangy. If something yaup the eleanora then the eleanora does not need the wren. The eleanora is not congealed.", "logic": "\nGoethean(joanie)\nYaup(joanie, wren)\nYaup(joanie, eleanora)\nGoethean(amie)\nnot Wreck(amie, wren)\nnot Wreck(amie, eleanora)\nRaffle(wren, eleanora)\nCongealed(wren)\nPolyoicous(wren)\nWreck(eleanora, amie)\nforall x (Raffle(x, wren) and not Raffle(wren, eleanora) -> Yaup(wren, joanie))\nRaffle(eleanora, amie) -> Wreck(amie, eleanora)\nforall x (Goethean(x) -> Congealed(x))\nforall x (Slangy(x) -> Goethean(x))\nforall x (Yaup(x, eleanora) -> Slangy(eleanora))\nforall x (Yaup(x, eleanora) -> not Yaup(eleanora, wren))\n\nnot Congealed(eleanora)\n\nYaup(joanie, eleanora) and forall x (Yaup(x, eleanora) -> Slangy(eleanora)) -> therefore Slangy(eleanora) Slangy(eleanora) and forall x (Slangy(x) -> Goethean(x)) -> therefore Goethean(eleanora) Goethean(eleanora) and forall x (Goethean(x) -> Congealed(x)) -> therefore Congealed(eleanora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The enrique is acting. The enrique hollo the vittoria. The enrique hollo the vinod. The stephi is acting. The stephi does not see the vittoria. The stephi does not see the vinod. The vittoria cashier the vinod. The vittoria is autumnal. The vittoria is leaded. The vinod reline the stephi. If something cashier the vittoria and the vittoria does not eat the vinod then the vittoria hollo the enrique. If the vinod cashier the stephi then the stephi reline the vinod. If something is acting then it is autumnal. All bullate things are acting. If something hollo the vinod then the vinod is bullate. If something hollo the vinod then the vinod does not need the vittoria. The vittoria is not acting.", "logic": "\nActing(enrique)\nHollo(enrique, vittoria)\nHollo(enrique, vinod)\nActing(stephi)\nnot Reline(stephi, vittoria)\nnot Reline(stephi, vinod)\nCashier(vittoria, vinod)\nAutumnal(vittoria)\nLeaded(vittoria)\nReline(vinod, stephi)\nforall x (Cashier(x, vittoria) and not Cashier(vittoria, vinod) -> Hollo(vittoria, enrique))\nCashier(vinod, stephi) -> Reline(stephi, vinod)\nforall x (Acting(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nforall x (Bullate(x) -> Acting(x))\nforall x (Hollo(x, vinod) -> Bullate(vinod))\nforall x (Hollo(x, vinod) -> not Hollo(vinod, vittoria))\n\nnot Acting(vittoria)\n\nforall x (Bullate(x) -> Acting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The inez is sewed. The inez snorkel the jeanne. The inez snorkel the perrine. The quincy is sewed. The quincy does not see the jeanne. The quincy does not see the perrine. The jeanne undersell the perrine. The jeanne is pineal. The jeanne is inchoate. The perrine gentle the quincy. If something undersell the jeanne and the jeanne does not eat the perrine then the jeanne snorkel the inez. If the perrine undersell the quincy then the quincy gentle the perrine. If something is sewed then it is pineal. All sunstruck things are sewed. If something snorkel the perrine then the perrine is sunstruck. If something snorkel the perrine then the perrine does not need the jeanne. The jeanne snorkel the inez.", "logic": "\nSewed(inez)\nSnorkel(inez, jeanne)\nSnorkel(inez, perrine)\nSewed(quincy)\nnot Gentle(quincy, jeanne)\nnot Gentle(quincy, perrine)\nUndersell(jeanne, perrine)\nPineal(jeanne)\nInchoate(jeanne)\nGentle(perrine, quincy)\nforall x (Undersell(x, jeanne) and not Undersell(jeanne, perrine) -> Snorkel(jeanne, inez))\nUndersell(perrine, quincy) -> Gentle(quincy, perrine)\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Pineal(x))\nforall x (Sunstruck(x) -> Sewed(x))\nforall x (Snorkel(x, perrine) -> Sunstruck(perrine))\nforall x (Snorkel(x, perrine) -> not Snorkel(perrine, jeanne))\n\nSnorkel(jeanne, inez)\n\nforall x (Undersell(x, jeanne) and not Undersell(jeanne, perrine) -> Snorkel(jeanne, inez)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The boyd is smiling. The boyd skirl the verge. The boyd skirl the corena. The hanford is smiling. The hanford does not see the verge. The hanford does not see the corena. The verge rankle the corena. The verge is biradial. The verge is unopened. The corena follow the hanford. If something rankle the verge and the verge does not eat the corena then the verge skirl the boyd. If the corena rankle the hanford then the hanford follow the corena. If something is smiling then it is biradial. All brassbound things are smiling. If something skirl the corena then the corena is brassbound. If something skirl the corena then the corena does not need the verge. The corena does not see the corena.", "logic": "\nSmiling(boyd)\nSkirl(boyd, verge)\nSkirl(boyd, corena)\nSmiling(hanford)\nnot Follow(hanford, verge)\nnot Follow(hanford, corena)\nRankle(verge, corena)\nBiradial(verge)\nUnopened(verge)\nFollow(corena, hanford)\nforall x (Rankle(x, verge) and not Rankle(verge, corena) -> Skirl(verge, boyd))\nRankle(corena, hanford) -> Follow(hanford, corena)\nforall x (Smiling(x) -> Biradial(x))\nforall x (Brassbound(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Skirl(x, corena) -> Brassbound(corena))\nforall x (Skirl(x, corena) -> not Skirl(corena, verge))\n\nnot Follow(corena, corena)\n\nnot Follow(corena, corena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The morna is pitchy. The morna reprocess the benn. The morna reprocess the pammy. The lonni is pitchy. The lonni does not see the benn. The lonni does not see the pammy. The benn perk the pammy. The benn is somber. The benn is reformable. The pammy replay the lonni. If something perk the benn and the benn does not eat the pammy then the benn reprocess the morna. If the pammy perk the lonni then the lonni replay the pammy. If something is pitchy then it is somber. All nonionised things are pitchy. If something reprocess the pammy then the pammy is nonionised. If something reprocess the pammy then the pammy does not need the benn. The lonni perk the morna.", "logic": "\nPitchy(morna)\nReprocess(morna, benn)\nReprocess(morna, pammy)\nPitchy(lonni)\nnot Replay(lonni, benn)\nnot Replay(lonni, pammy)\nPerk(benn, pammy)\nSomber(benn)\nReformable(benn)\nReplay(pammy, lonni)\nforall x (Perk(x, benn) and not Perk(benn, pammy) -> Reprocess(benn, morna))\nPerk(pammy, lonni) -> Replay(lonni, pammy)\nforall x (Pitchy(x) -> Somber(x))\nforall x (Nonionised(x) -> Pitchy(x))\nforall x (Reprocess(x, pammy) -> Nonionised(pammy))\nforall x (Reprocess(x, pammy) -> not Reprocess(pammy, benn))\n\nPerk(lonni, morna)\n\nPerk(lonni, morna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The jeanette is catalectic. The jeanette canker the waite. The jeanette canker the genia. The meghann is catalectic. The meghann does not see the waite. The meghann does not see the genia. The waite refocus the genia. The waite is inbound. The waite is ringed. The genia roughcast the meghann. If something refocus the waite and the waite does not eat the genia then the waite canker the jeanette. If the genia refocus the meghann then the meghann roughcast the genia. If something is catalectic then it is inbound. All asthmatic things are catalectic. If something canker the genia then the genia is asthmatic. If something canker the genia then the genia does not need the waite. The meghann does not need the jeanette.", "logic": "\nCatalectic(jeanette)\nCanker(jeanette, waite)\nCanker(jeanette, genia)\nCatalectic(meghann)\nnot Roughcast(meghann, waite)\nnot Roughcast(meghann, genia)\nRefocus(waite, genia)\nInbound(waite)\nRinged(waite)\nRoughcast(genia, meghann)\nforall x (Refocus(x, waite) and not Refocus(waite, genia) -> Canker(waite, jeanette))\nRefocus(genia, meghann) -> Roughcast(meghann, genia)\nforall x (Catalectic(x) -> Inbound(x))\nforall x (Asthmatic(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Canker(x, genia) -> Asthmatic(genia))\nforall x (Canker(x, genia) -> not Canker(genia, waite))\n\nnot Canker(meghann, jeanette)\n\nnot Canker(meghann, jeanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The martita is sneaky. The martita recede the geralda. The martita recede the benson. The sibelle is sneaky. The sibelle does not see the geralda. The sibelle does not see the benson. The geralda acerbate the benson. The geralda is believable. The geralda is agleam. The benson hurt the sibelle. If something acerbate the geralda and the geralda does not eat the benson then the geralda recede the martita. If the benson acerbate the sibelle then the sibelle hurt the benson. If something is sneaky then it is believable. All bistroic things are sneaky. If something recede the benson then the benson is bistroic. If something recede the benson then the benson does not need the geralda. The sibelle recede the sibelle.", "logic": "\nSneaky(martita)\nRecede(martita, geralda)\nRecede(martita, benson)\nSneaky(sibelle)\nnot Hurt(sibelle, geralda)\nnot Hurt(sibelle, benson)\nAcerbate(geralda, benson)\nBelievable(geralda)\nAgleam(geralda)\nHurt(benson, sibelle)\nforall x (Acerbate(x, geralda) and not Acerbate(geralda, benson) -> Recede(geralda, martita))\nAcerbate(benson, sibelle) -> Hurt(sibelle, benson)\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Bistroic(x) -> Sneaky(x))\nforall x (Recede(x, benson) -> Bistroic(benson))\nforall x (Recede(x, benson) -> not Recede(benson, geralda))\n\nRecede(sibelle, sibelle)\n\nRecede(sibelle, sibelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The mead is gradatory. The mead involve the shelby. The mead involve the juli. The alwin is gradatory. The alwin does not see the shelby. The alwin does not see the juli. The shelby patinize the juli. The shelby is undesired. The shelby is amateurish. The juli transfuse the alwin. If something patinize the shelby and the shelby does not eat the juli then the shelby involve the mead. If the juli patinize the alwin then the alwin transfuse the juli. If something is gradatory then it is undesired. All louche things are gradatory. If something involve the juli then the juli is louche. If something involve the juli then the juli does not need the shelby. The juli does not eat the mead.", "logic": "\nGradatory(mead)\nInvolve(mead, shelby)\nInvolve(mead, juli)\nGradatory(alwin)\nnot Transfuse(alwin, shelby)\nnot Transfuse(alwin, juli)\nPatinize(shelby, juli)\nUndesired(shelby)\nAmateurish(shelby)\nTransfuse(juli, alwin)\nforall x (Patinize(x, shelby) and not Patinize(shelby, juli) -> Involve(shelby, mead))\nPatinize(juli, alwin) -> Transfuse(alwin, juli)\nforall x (Gradatory(x) -> Undesired(x))\nforall x (Louche(x) -> Gradatory(x))\nforall x (Involve(x, juli) -> Louche(juli))\nforall x (Involve(x, juli) -> not Involve(juli, shelby))\n\nnot Patinize(juli, mead)\n\nnot Patinize(juli, mead) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The lolly is balanced. The lolly award the kimmie. The lolly award the alford. The jimmie is balanced. The jimmie does not see the kimmie. The jimmie does not see the alford. The kimmie bite the alford. The kimmie is unsmooth. The kimmie is corrupted. The alford niggle the jimmie. If something bite the kimmie and the kimmie does not eat the alford then the kimmie award the lolly. If the alford bite the jimmie then the jimmie niggle the alford. If something is balanced then it is unsmooth. All postexilic things are balanced. If something award the alford then the alford is postexilic. If something award the alford then the alford does not need the kimmie. The kimmie bite the lolly.", "logic": "\nBalanced(lolly)\nAward(lolly, kimmie)\nAward(lolly, alford)\nBalanced(jimmie)\nnot Niggle(jimmie, kimmie)\nnot Niggle(jimmie, alford)\nBite(kimmie, alford)\nUnsmooth(kimmie)\nCorrupted(kimmie)\nNiggle(alford, jimmie)\nforall x (Bite(x, kimmie) and not Bite(kimmie, alford) -> Award(kimmie, lolly))\nBite(alford, jimmie) -> Niggle(jimmie, alford)\nforall x (Balanced(x) -> Unsmooth(x))\nforall x (Postexilic(x) -> Balanced(x))\nforall x (Award(x, alford) -> Postexilic(alford))\nforall x (Award(x, alford) -> not Award(alford, kimmie))\n\nBite(kimmie, lolly)\n\nBite(kimmie, lolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-919"} {"premises": "The austin is hokey. The austin solicit the jessamine. The austin solicit the selena. The austin peroxide the selena. The jessamine is reprobate. The jessamine is cheesy. The jessamine solicit the selena. The jessamine grit the selena. The selena is hokey. The selena is reprobate. The selena peroxide the jessamine. The selena grit the jessamine. If something is hokey then it solicit the selena. If something is hokey and it solicit the selena then it peroxide the austin. If something solicit the selena then the selena peroxide the jessamine. If something grit the selena then it is liii. If something is liii then it is hokey. If the jessamine peroxide the austin and the austin grit the selena then the jessamine peroxide the selena. The austin peroxide the selena.", "logic": "\nHokey(austin)\nSolicit(austin, jessamine)\nSolicit(austin, selena)\nPeroxide(austin, selena)\nReprobate(jessamine)\nCheesy(jessamine)\nSolicit(jessamine, selena)\nGrit(jessamine, selena)\nHokey(selena)\nReprobate(selena)\nPeroxide(selena, jessamine)\nGrit(selena, jessamine)\nforall x (Hokey(x) -> Solicit(x, selena))\nforall x (Hokey(x) and Solicit(x, selena) -> Peroxide(x, austin))\nforall x (Solicit(x, selena) -> Peroxide(selena, jessamine))\nforall x (Grit(x, selena) -> Liii(x))\nforall x (Liii(x) -> Hokey(x))\nPeroxide(jessamine, austin) and Grit(austin, selena) -> Peroxide(jessamine, selena)\n\nPeroxide(austin, selena)\n\ntherefore Peroxide(austin, selena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The stephan is figurative. The stephan caress the renell. The stephan caress the collie. The stephan flight the collie. The renell is fearsome. The renell is plumy. The renell caress the collie. The renell attempt the collie. The collie is figurative. The collie is fearsome. The collie flight the renell. The collie attempt the renell. If something is figurative then it caress the collie. If something is figurative and it caress the collie then it flight the stephan. If something caress the collie then the collie flight the renell. If something attempt the collie then it is megalithic. If something is megalithic then it is figurative. If the renell flight the stephan and the stephan attempt the collie then the renell flight the collie. The stephan does not need the collie.", "logic": "\nFigurative(stephan)\nCaress(stephan, renell)\nCaress(stephan, collie)\nFlight(stephan, collie)\nFearsome(renell)\nPlumy(renell)\nCaress(renell, collie)\nAttempt(renell, collie)\nFigurative(collie)\nFearsome(collie)\nFlight(collie, renell)\nAttempt(collie, renell)\nforall x (Figurative(x) -> Caress(x, collie))\nforall x (Figurative(x) and Caress(x, collie) -> Flight(x, stephan))\nforall x (Caress(x, collie) -> Flight(collie, renell))\nforall x (Attempt(x, collie) -> Megalithic(x))\nforall x (Megalithic(x) -> Figurative(x))\nFlight(renell, stephan) and Attempt(stephan, collie) -> Flight(renell, collie)\n\nnot Flight(stephan, collie)\n\ntherefore Flight(stephan, collie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The becca is sterilized. The becca fence the wandie. The becca fence the hakeem. The becca finance the hakeem. The wandie is hinder. The wandie is ferocious. The wandie fence the hakeem. The wandie misspend the hakeem. The hakeem is sterilized. The hakeem is hinder. The hakeem finance the wandie. The hakeem misspend the wandie. If something is sterilized then it fence the hakeem. If something is sterilized and it fence the hakeem then it finance the becca. If something fence the hakeem then the hakeem finance the wandie. If something misspend the hakeem then it is britannic. If something is britannic then it is sterilized. If the wandie finance the becca and the becca misspend the hakeem then the wandie finance the hakeem. The hakeem fence the hakeem.", "logic": "\nSterilized(becca)\nFence(becca, wandie)\nFence(becca, hakeem)\nFinance(becca, hakeem)\nHinder(wandie)\nFerocious(wandie)\nFence(wandie, hakeem)\nMisspend(wandie, hakeem)\nSterilized(hakeem)\nHinder(hakeem)\nFinance(hakeem, wandie)\nMisspend(hakeem, wandie)\nforall x (Sterilized(x) -> Fence(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Sterilized(x) and Fence(x, hakeem) -> Finance(x, becca))\nforall x (Fence(x, hakeem) -> Finance(hakeem, wandie))\nforall x (Misspend(x, hakeem) -> Britannic(x))\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nFinance(wandie, becca) and Misspend(becca, hakeem) -> Finance(wandie, hakeem)\n\nFence(hakeem, hakeem)\n\nSterilized(hakeem) and forall x (Sterilized(x) -> Fence(x, hakeem)) -> therefore Fence(hakeem, hakeem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The rabbi is monophonic. The rabbi club the delly. The rabbi club the wallis. The rabbi spoon the wallis. The delly is schematic. The delly is untellable. The delly club the wallis. The delly recollect the wallis. The wallis is monophonic. The wallis is schematic. The wallis spoon the delly. The wallis recollect the delly. If something is monophonic then it club the wallis. If something is monophonic and it club the wallis then it spoon the rabbi. If something club the wallis then the wallis spoon the delly. If something recollect the wallis then it is tutorial. If something is tutorial then it is monophonic. If the delly spoon the rabbi and the rabbi recollect the wallis then the delly spoon the wallis. The rabbi does not need the rabbi.", "logic": "\nMonophonic(rabbi)\nClub(rabbi, delly)\nClub(rabbi, wallis)\nSpoon(rabbi, wallis)\nSchematic(delly)\nUntellable(delly)\nClub(delly, wallis)\nRecollect(delly, wallis)\nMonophonic(wallis)\nSchematic(wallis)\nSpoon(wallis, delly)\nRecollect(wallis, delly)\nforall x (Monophonic(x) -> Club(x, wallis))\nforall x (Monophonic(x) and Club(x, wallis) -> Spoon(x, rabbi))\nforall x (Club(x, wallis) -> Spoon(wallis, delly))\nforall x (Recollect(x, wallis) -> Tutorial(x))\nforall x (Tutorial(x) -> Monophonic(x))\nSpoon(delly, rabbi) and Recollect(rabbi, wallis) -> Spoon(delly, wallis)\n\nnot Spoon(rabbi, rabbi)\n\nMonophonic(rabbi) and Club(rabbi, wallis) and forall x (Monophonic(x) and Club(x, wallis) -> Spoon(x, rabbi)) -> therefore Spoon(rabbi, rabbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The richmond is satyric. The richmond edit the kyle. The richmond edit the galina. The richmond square the galina. The kyle is lxiv. The kyle is quickset. The kyle edit the galina. The kyle hibernate the galina. The galina is satyric. The galina is lxiv. The galina square the kyle. The galina hibernate the kyle. If something is satyric then it edit the galina. If something is satyric and it edit the galina then it square the richmond. If something edit the galina then the galina square the kyle. If something hibernate the galina then it is seven. If something is seven then it is satyric. If the kyle square the richmond and the richmond hibernate the galina then the kyle square the galina. The kyle is satyric.", "logic": "\nSatyric(richmond)\nEdit(richmond, kyle)\nEdit(richmond, galina)\nSquare(richmond, galina)\nLxiv(kyle)\nQuickset(kyle)\nEdit(kyle, galina)\nHibernate(kyle, galina)\nSatyric(galina)\nLxiv(galina)\nSquare(galina, kyle)\nHibernate(galina, kyle)\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Edit(x, galina))\nforall x (Satyric(x) and Edit(x, galina) -> Square(x, richmond))\nforall x (Edit(x, galina) -> Square(galina, kyle))\nforall x (Hibernate(x, galina) -> Seven(x))\nforall x (Seven(x) -> Satyric(x))\nSquare(kyle, richmond) and Hibernate(richmond, galina) -> Square(kyle, galina)\n\nSatyric(kyle)\n\nHibernate(kyle, galina) and forall x (Hibernate(x, galina) -> Seven(x)) -> therefore Seven(kyle) Seven(kyle) and forall x (Seven(x) -> Satyric(x)) -> therefore Satyric(kyle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The magdalene is leafed. The magdalene filtrate the yankee. The magdalene filtrate the roselyn. The magdalene remit the roselyn. The yankee is verbalized. The yankee is southbound. The yankee filtrate the roselyn. The yankee plonk the roselyn. The roselyn is leafed. The roselyn is verbalized. The roselyn remit the yankee. The roselyn plonk the yankee. If something is leafed then it filtrate the roselyn. If something is leafed and it filtrate the roselyn then it remit the magdalene. If something filtrate the roselyn then the roselyn remit the yankee. If something plonk the roselyn then it is braided. If something is braided then it is leafed. If the yankee remit the magdalene and the magdalene plonk the roselyn then the yankee remit the roselyn. The roselyn does not need the magdalene.", "logic": "\nLeafed(magdalene)\nFiltrate(magdalene, yankee)\nFiltrate(magdalene, roselyn)\nRemit(magdalene, roselyn)\nVerbalized(yankee)\nSouthbound(yankee)\nFiltrate(yankee, roselyn)\nPlonk(yankee, roselyn)\nLeafed(roselyn)\nVerbalized(roselyn)\nRemit(roselyn, yankee)\nPlonk(roselyn, yankee)\nforall x (Leafed(x) -> Filtrate(x, roselyn))\nforall x (Leafed(x) and Filtrate(x, roselyn) -> Remit(x, magdalene))\nforall x (Filtrate(x, roselyn) -> Remit(roselyn, yankee))\nforall x (Plonk(x, roselyn) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Braided(x) -> Leafed(x))\nRemit(yankee, magdalene) and Plonk(magdalene, roselyn) -> Remit(yankee, roselyn)\n\nnot Remit(roselyn, magdalene)\n\nLeafed(roselyn) and forall x (Leafed(x) -> Filtrate(x, roselyn)) -> therefore Filtrate(roselyn, roselyn) Leafed(roselyn) and Filtrate(roselyn, roselyn) and forall x (Leafed(x) and Filtrate(x, roselyn) -> Remit(x, magdalene)) -> therefore Remit(roselyn, magdalene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The taddeo is monastic. The taddeo embed the lari. The taddeo embed the claire. The taddeo diddle the claire. The lari is squashed. The lari is slouchy. The lari embed the claire. The lari calendar the claire. The claire is monastic. The claire is squashed. The claire diddle the lari. The claire calendar the lari. If something is monastic then it embed the claire. If something is monastic and it embed the claire then it diddle the taddeo. If something embed the claire then the claire diddle the lari. If something calendar the claire then it is documented. If something is documented then it is monastic. If the lari diddle the taddeo and the taddeo calendar the claire then the lari diddle the claire. The lari diddle the taddeo.", "logic": "\nMonastic(taddeo)\nEmbed(taddeo, lari)\nEmbed(taddeo, claire)\nDiddle(taddeo, claire)\nSquashed(lari)\nSlouchy(lari)\nEmbed(lari, claire)\nCalendar(lari, claire)\nMonastic(claire)\nSquashed(claire)\nDiddle(claire, lari)\nCalendar(claire, lari)\nforall x (Monastic(x) -> Embed(x, claire))\nforall x (Monastic(x) and Embed(x, claire) -> Diddle(x, taddeo))\nforall x (Embed(x, claire) -> Diddle(claire, lari))\nforall x (Calendar(x, claire) -> Documented(x))\nforall x (Documented(x) -> Monastic(x))\nDiddle(lari, taddeo) and Calendar(taddeo, claire) -> Diddle(lari, claire)\n\nDiddle(lari, taddeo)\n\nCalendar(lari, claire) and forall x (Calendar(x, claire) -> Documented(x)) -> therefore Documented(lari) Documented(lari) and forall x (Documented(x) -> Monastic(x)) -> therefore Monastic(lari) Monastic(lari) and Embed(lari, claire) and forall x (Monastic(x) and Embed(x, claire) -> Diddle(x, taddeo)) -> therefore Diddle(lari, taddeo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The vail is grapey. The vail ratify the zondra. The vail ratify the gustav. The vail handstamp the gustav. The zondra is meticulous. The zondra is aboveboard. The zondra ratify the gustav. The zondra capsule the gustav. The gustav is grapey. The gustav is meticulous. The gustav handstamp the zondra. The gustav capsule the zondra. If something is grapey then it ratify the gustav. If something is grapey and it ratify the gustav then it handstamp the vail. If something ratify the gustav then the gustav handstamp the zondra. If something capsule the gustav then it is stinky. If something is stinky then it is grapey. If the zondra handstamp the vail and the vail capsule the gustav then the zondra handstamp the gustav. The zondra does not need the vail.", "logic": "\nGrapey(vail)\nRatify(vail, zondra)\nRatify(vail, gustav)\nHandstamp(vail, gustav)\nMeticulous(zondra)\nAboveboard(zondra)\nRatify(zondra, gustav)\nCapsule(zondra, gustav)\nGrapey(gustav)\nMeticulous(gustav)\nHandstamp(gustav, zondra)\nCapsule(gustav, zondra)\nforall x (Grapey(x) -> Ratify(x, gustav))\nforall x (Grapey(x) and Ratify(x, gustav) -> Handstamp(x, vail))\nforall x (Ratify(x, gustav) -> Handstamp(gustav, zondra))\nforall x (Capsule(x, gustav) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) -> Grapey(x))\nHandstamp(zondra, vail) and Capsule(vail, gustav) -> Handstamp(zondra, gustav)\n\nnot Handstamp(zondra, vail)\n\nCapsule(zondra, gustav) and forall x (Capsule(x, gustav) -> Stinky(x)) -> therefore Stinky(zondra) Stinky(zondra) and forall x (Stinky(x) -> Grapey(x)) -> therefore Grapey(zondra) Grapey(zondra) and Ratify(zondra, gustav) and forall x (Grapey(x) and Ratify(x, gustav) -> Handstamp(x, vail)) -> therefore Handstamp(zondra, vail)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The larry is westward. The larry razor the haskel. The larry razor the kassie. The larry bisect the kassie. The haskel is fortuitous. The haskel is unbearable. The haskel razor the kassie. The haskel bowdlerise the kassie. The kassie is westward. The kassie is fortuitous. The kassie bisect the haskel. The kassie bowdlerise the haskel. If something is westward then it razor the kassie. If something is westward and it razor the kassie then it bisect the larry. If something razor the kassie then the kassie bisect the haskel. If something bowdlerise the kassie then it is apostate. If something is apostate then it is westward. If the haskel bisect the larry and the larry bowdlerise the kassie then the haskel bisect the kassie. The larry is not apostate.", "logic": "\nWestward(larry)\nRazor(larry, haskel)\nRazor(larry, kassie)\nBisect(larry, kassie)\nFortuitous(haskel)\nUnbearable(haskel)\nRazor(haskel, kassie)\nBowdlerise(haskel, kassie)\nWestward(kassie)\nFortuitous(kassie)\nBisect(kassie, haskel)\nBowdlerise(kassie, haskel)\nforall x (Westward(x) -> Razor(x, kassie))\nforall x (Westward(x) and Razor(x, kassie) -> Bisect(x, larry))\nforall x (Razor(x, kassie) -> Bisect(kassie, haskel))\nforall x (Bowdlerise(x, kassie) -> Apostate(x))\nforall x (Apostate(x) -> Westward(x))\nBisect(haskel, larry) and Bowdlerise(larry, kassie) -> Bisect(haskel, kassie)\n\nnot Apostate(larry)\n\nforall x (Bowdlerise(x, kassie) -> Apostate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The jilli is pyramidal. The jilli assist the rafaela. The jilli assist the shawnee. The jilli blunt the shawnee. The rafaela is gleaming. The rafaela is baccate. The rafaela assist the shawnee. The rafaela pose the shawnee. The shawnee is pyramidal. The shawnee is gleaming. The shawnee blunt the rafaela. The shawnee pose the rafaela. If something is pyramidal then it assist the shawnee. If something is pyramidal and it assist the shawnee then it blunt the jilli. If something assist the shawnee then the shawnee blunt the rafaela. If something pose the shawnee then it is semirigid. If something is semirigid then it is pyramidal. If the rafaela blunt the jilli and the jilli pose the shawnee then the rafaela blunt the shawnee. The shawnee is semirigid.", "logic": "\nPyramidal(jilli)\nAssist(jilli, rafaela)\nAssist(jilli, shawnee)\nBlunt(jilli, shawnee)\nGleaming(rafaela)\nBaccate(rafaela)\nAssist(rafaela, shawnee)\nPose(rafaela, shawnee)\nPyramidal(shawnee)\nGleaming(shawnee)\nBlunt(shawnee, rafaela)\nPose(shawnee, rafaela)\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) -> Assist(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) and Assist(x, shawnee) -> Blunt(x, jilli))\nforall x (Assist(x, shawnee) -> Blunt(shawnee, rafaela))\nforall x (Pose(x, shawnee) -> Semirigid(x))\nforall x (Semirigid(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nBlunt(rafaela, jilli) and Pose(jilli, shawnee) -> Blunt(rafaela, shawnee)\n\nSemirigid(shawnee)\n\nforall x (Pose(x, shawnee) -> Semirigid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The chantalle is made. The chantalle devote the conchita. The chantalle devote the cyrille. The chantalle environ the cyrille. The conchita is romansh. The conchita is credal. The conchita devote the cyrille. The conchita dismay the cyrille. The cyrille is made. The cyrille is romansh. The cyrille environ the conchita. The cyrille dismay the conchita. If something is made then it devote the cyrille. If something is made and it devote the cyrille then it environ the chantalle. If something devote the cyrille then the cyrille environ the conchita. If something dismay the cyrille then it is rhizoidal. If something is rhizoidal then it is made. If the conchita environ the chantalle and the chantalle dismay the cyrille then the conchita environ the cyrille. The conchita does not need the cyrille.", "logic": "\nMade(chantalle)\nDevote(chantalle, conchita)\nDevote(chantalle, cyrille)\nEnviron(chantalle, cyrille)\nRomansh(conchita)\nCredal(conchita)\nDevote(conchita, cyrille)\nDismay(conchita, cyrille)\nMade(cyrille)\nRomansh(cyrille)\nEnviron(cyrille, conchita)\nDismay(cyrille, conchita)\nforall x (Made(x) -> Devote(x, cyrille))\nforall x (Made(x) and Devote(x, cyrille) -> Environ(x, chantalle))\nforall x (Devote(x, cyrille) -> Environ(cyrille, conchita))\nforall x (Dismay(x, cyrille) -> Rhizoidal(x))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Made(x))\nEnviron(conchita, chantalle) and Dismay(chantalle, cyrille) -> Environ(conchita, cyrille)\n\nnot Environ(conchita, cyrille)\n\nEnviron(conchita, chantalle) and Dismay(chantalle, cyrille) -> Environ(conchita, cyrille) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The beowulf is barreled. The beowulf push the sabrina. The beowulf push the bonita. The beowulf conspire the bonita. The sabrina is blowy. The sabrina is brinded. The sabrina push the bonita. The sabrina gluttonise the bonita. The bonita is barreled. The bonita is blowy. The bonita conspire the sabrina. The bonita gluttonise the sabrina. If something is barreled then it push the bonita. If something is barreled and it push the bonita then it conspire the beowulf. If something push the bonita then the bonita conspire the sabrina. If something gluttonise the bonita then it is unclear. If something is unclear then it is barreled. If the sabrina conspire the beowulf and the beowulf gluttonise the bonita then the sabrina conspire the bonita. The beowulf gluttonise the bonita.", "logic": "\nBarreled(beowulf)\nPush(beowulf, sabrina)\nPush(beowulf, bonita)\nConspire(beowulf, bonita)\nBlowy(sabrina)\nBrinded(sabrina)\nPush(sabrina, bonita)\nGluttonise(sabrina, bonita)\nBarreled(bonita)\nBlowy(bonita)\nConspire(bonita, sabrina)\nGluttonise(bonita, sabrina)\nforall x (Barreled(x) -> Push(x, bonita))\nforall x (Barreled(x) and Push(x, bonita) -> Conspire(x, beowulf))\nforall x (Push(x, bonita) -> Conspire(bonita, sabrina))\nforall x (Gluttonise(x, bonita) -> Unclear(x))\nforall x (Unclear(x) -> Barreled(x))\nConspire(sabrina, beowulf) and Gluttonise(beowulf, bonita) -> Conspire(sabrina, bonita)\n\nGluttonise(beowulf, bonita)\n\nGluttonise(beowulf, bonita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The althea is placable. The althea burrow the higgins. The althea burrow the rolfe. The althea dislocate the rolfe. The higgins is provoked. The higgins is adjacent. The higgins burrow the rolfe. The higgins castle the rolfe. The rolfe is placable. The rolfe is provoked. The rolfe dislocate the higgins. The rolfe castle the higgins. If something is placable then it burrow the rolfe. If something is placable and it burrow the rolfe then it dislocate the althea. If something burrow the rolfe then the rolfe dislocate the higgins. If something castle the rolfe then it is atrophic. If something is atrophic then it is placable. If the higgins dislocate the althea and the althea castle the rolfe then the higgins dislocate the rolfe. The higgins does not like the higgins.", "logic": "\nPlacable(althea)\nBurrow(althea, higgins)\nBurrow(althea, rolfe)\nDislocate(althea, rolfe)\nProvoked(higgins)\nAdjacent(higgins)\nBurrow(higgins, rolfe)\nCastle(higgins, rolfe)\nPlacable(rolfe)\nProvoked(rolfe)\nDislocate(rolfe, higgins)\nCastle(rolfe, higgins)\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Burrow(x, rolfe))\nforall x (Placable(x) and Burrow(x, rolfe) -> Dislocate(x, althea))\nforall x (Burrow(x, rolfe) -> Dislocate(rolfe, higgins))\nforall x (Castle(x, rolfe) -> Atrophic(x))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) -> Placable(x))\nDislocate(higgins, althea) and Castle(althea, rolfe) -> Dislocate(higgins, rolfe)\n\nnot Burrow(higgins, higgins)\n\nnot Burrow(higgins, higgins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The elayne is affirmable. The elayne didder the aldis. The elayne didder the adriaens. The elayne funk the adriaens. The aldis is beige. The aldis is allophonic. The aldis didder the adriaens. The aldis refurbish the adriaens. The adriaens is affirmable. The adriaens is beige. The adriaens funk the aldis. The adriaens refurbish the aldis. If something is affirmable then it didder the adriaens. If something is affirmable and it didder the adriaens then it funk the elayne. If something didder the adriaens then the adriaens funk the aldis. If something refurbish the adriaens then it is portentous. If something is portentous then it is affirmable. If the aldis funk the elayne and the elayne refurbish the adriaens then the aldis funk the adriaens. The elayne refurbish the aldis.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(elayne)\nDidder(elayne, aldis)\nDidder(elayne, adriaens)\nFunk(elayne, adriaens)\nBeige(aldis)\nAllophonic(aldis)\nDidder(aldis, adriaens)\nRefurbish(aldis, adriaens)\nAffirmable(adriaens)\nBeige(adriaens)\nFunk(adriaens, aldis)\nRefurbish(adriaens, aldis)\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Didder(x, adriaens))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) and Didder(x, adriaens) -> Funk(x, elayne))\nforall x (Didder(x, adriaens) -> Funk(adriaens, aldis))\nforall x (Refurbish(x, adriaens) -> Portentous(x))\nforall x (Portentous(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nFunk(aldis, elayne) and Refurbish(elayne, adriaens) -> Funk(aldis, adriaens)\n\nRefurbish(elayne, aldis)\n\nRefurbish(elayne, aldis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The jammie is uncanny. The jammie pulp the filmore. The jammie pulp the avril. The jammie forward the avril. The filmore is clever. The filmore is paired. The filmore pulp the avril. The filmore incrust the avril. The avril is uncanny. The avril is clever. The avril forward the filmore. The avril incrust the filmore. If something is uncanny then it pulp the avril. If something is uncanny and it pulp the avril then it forward the jammie. If something pulp the avril then the avril forward the filmore. If something incrust the avril then it is adnate. If something is adnate then it is uncanny. If the filmore forward the jammie and the jammie incrust the avril then the filmore forward the avril. The filmore does not like the jammie.", "logic": "\nUncanny(jammie)\nPulp(jammie, filmore)\nPulp(jammie, avril)\nForward(jammie, avril)\nClever(filmore)\nPaired(filmore)\nPulp(filmore, avril)\nIncrust(filmore, avril)\nUncanny(avril)\nClever(avril)\nForward(avril, filmore)\nIncrust(avril, filmore)\nforall x (Uncanny(x) -> Pulp(x, avril))\nforall x (Uncanny(x) and Pulp(x, avril) -> Forward(x, jammie))\nforall x (Pulp(x, avril) -> Forward(avril, filmore))\nforall x (Incrust(x, avril) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Adnate(x) -> Uncanny(x))\nForward(filmore, jammie) and Incrust(jammie, avril) -> Forward(filmore, avril)\n\nnot Pulp(filmore, jammie)\n\nnot Pulp(filmore, jammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "The grata is lxxxiii. The grata pauperize the gwyneth. The grata pauperize the yancy. The grata thump the yancy. The gwyneth is unopposed. The gwyneth is inshore. The gwyneth pauperize the yancy. The gwyneth insinuate the yancy. The yancy is lxxxiii. The yancy is unopposed. The yancy thump the gwyneth. The yancy insinuate the gwyneth. If something is lxxxiii then it pauperize the yancy. If something is lxxxiii and it pauperize the yancy then it thump the grata. If something pauperize the yancy then the yancy thump the gwyneth. If something insinuate the yancy then it is vitriolic. If something is vitriolic then it is lxxxiii. If the gwyneth thump the grata and the grata insinuate the yancy then the gwyneth thump the yancy. The yancy thump the yancy.", "logic": "\nLxxxiii(grata)\nPauperize(grata, gwyneth)\nPauperize(grata, yancy)\nThump(grata, yancy)\nUnopposed(gwyneth)\nInshore(gwyneth)\nPauperize(gwyneth, yancy)\nInsinuate(gwyneth, yancy)\nLxxxiii(yancy)\nUnopposed(yancy)\nThump(yancy, gwyneth)\nInsinuate(yancy, gwyneth)\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) -> Pauperize(x, yancy))\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) and Pauperize(x, yancy) -> Thump(x, grata))\nforall x (Pauperize(x, yancy) -> Thump(yancy, gwyneth))\nforall x (Insinuate(x, yancy) -> Vitriolic(x))\nforall x (Vitriolic(x) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nThump(gwyneth, grata) and Insinuate(grata, yancy) -> Thump(gwyneth, yancy)\n\nThump(yancy, yancy)\n\nThump(yancy, yancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-56"} {"premises": "Deny is buxom. Deny is unvarying. Deny is embodied. Deny is paschal. Monica is buxom. Monica is embodied. Avril is buxom. Avril is botuliform. Avril is unvarying. Avril is embodied. Odella is buxom. Odella is botuliform. Odella is propelling. Odella is ionised. Odella is embodied. Odella is paschal. If something is embodied then it is buxom. If something is embodied then it is botuliform. If Deny is paschal and Deny is buxom then Deny is unvarying. All paschal, embodied things are propelling. If Odella is propelling and Odella is paschal then Odella is embodied. If something is botuliform then it is paschal. Odella is propelling.", "logic": "\nBuxom(deny)\nUnvarying(deny)\nEmbodied(deny)\nPaschal(deny)\nBuxom(monica)\nEmbodied(monica)\nBuxom(avril)\nBotuliform(avril)\nUnvarying(avril)\nEmbodied(avril)\nBuxom(odella)\nBotuliform(odella)\nPropelling(odella)\nIonised(odella)\nEmbodied(odella)\nPaschal(odella)\nforall x (Embodied(x) -> Buxom(x))\nforall x (Embodied(x) -> Botuliform(x))\nPaschal(deny) and Buxom(deny) -> Unvarying(deny)\nforall x (Paschal(x) and Embodied(x) -> Propelling(x))\nPropelling(odella) and Paschal(odella) -> Embodied(odella)\nforall x (Botuliform(x) -> Paschal(x))\n\nPropelling(odella)\n\ntherefore Propelling(odella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Izzy is summery. Izzy is normative. Izzy is piagetian. Izzy is uncleanly. Ted is summery. Ted is piagetian. Bevvy is summery. Bevvy is fetid. Bevvy is normative. Bevvy is piagetian. Jaquith is summery. Jaquith is fetid. Jaquith is spick. Jaquith is chicken. Jaquith is piagetian. Jaquith is uncleanly. If something is piagetian then it is summery. If something is piagetian then it is fetid. If Izzy is uncleanly and Izzy is summery then Izzy is normative. All uncleanly, piagetian things are spick. If Jaquith is spick and Jaquith is uncleanly then Jaquith is piagetian. If something is fetid then it is uncleanly. Jaquith is not fetid.", "logic": "\nSummery(izzy)\nNormative(izzy)\nPiagetian(izzy)\nUncleanly(izzy)\nSummery(ted)\nPiagetian(ted)\nSummery(bevvy)\nFetid(bevvy)\nNormative(bevvy)\nPiagetian(bevvy)\nSummery(jaquith)\nFetid(jaquith)\nSpick(jaquith)\nChicken(jaquith)\nPiagetian(jaquith)\nUncleanly(jaquith)\nforall x (Piagetian(x) -> Summery(x))\nforall x (Piagetian(x) -> Fetid(x))\nUncleanly(izzy) and Summery(izzy) -> Normative(izzy)\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) and Piagetian(x) -> Spick(x))\nSpick(jaquith) and Uncleanly(jaquith) -> Piagetian(jaquith)\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\n\nnot Fetid(jaquith)\n\ntherefore Fetid(jaquith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Ilona is blueish. Ilona is flatulent. Ilona is xxxviii. Ilona is promotive. Gamaliel is blueish. Gamaliel is xxxviii. Aline is blueish. Aline is lxxxvi. Aline is flatulent. Aline is xxxviii. Morgana is blueish. Morgana is lxxxvi. Morgana is adscript. Morgana is arachnoid. Morgana is xxxviii. Morgana is promotive. If something is xxxviii then it is blueish. If something is xxxviii then it is lxxxvi. If Ilona is promotive and Ilona is blueish then Ilona is flatulent. All promotive, xxxviii things are adscript. If Morgana is adscript and Morgana is promotive then Morgana is xxxviii. If something is lxxxvi then it is promotive. Ilona is adscript.", "logic": "\nBlueish(ilona)\nFlatulent(ilona)\nXxxviii(ilona)\nPromotive(ilona)\nBlueish(gamaliel)\nXxxviii(gamaliel)\nBlueish(aline)\nLxxxvi(aline)\nFlatulent(aline)\nXxxviii(aline)\nBlueish(morgana)\nLxxxvi(morgana)\nAdscript(morgana)\nArachnoid(morgana)\nXxxviii(morgana)\nPromotive(morgana)\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Blueish(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Lxxxvi(x))\nPromotive(ilona) and Blueish(ilona) -> Flatulent(ilona)\nforall x (Promotive(x) and Xxxviii(x) -> Adscript(x))\nAdscript(morgana) and Promotive(morgana) -> Xxxviii(morgana)\nforall x (Lxxxvi(x) -> Promotive(x))\n\nAdscript(ilona)\n\nPromotive(ilona) and Xxxviii(ilona) and forall x (Promotive(x) and Xxxviii(x) -> Adscript(x)) -> therefore Adscript(ilona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Jess is peccable. Jess is saxicoline. Jess is vendible. Jess is laurelled. Torre is peccable. Torre is vendible. Nataline is peccable. Nataline is addlepated. Nataline is saxicoline. Nataline is vendible. Sibbie is peccable. Sibbie is addlepated. Sibbie is wholemeal. Sibbie is illiterate. Sibbie is vendible. Sibbie is laurelled. If something is vendible then it is peccable. If something is vendible then it is addlepated. If Jess is laurelled and Jess is peccable then Jess is saxicoline. All laurelled, vendible things are wholemeal. If Sibbie is wholemeal and Sibbie is laurelled then Sibbie is vendible. If something is addlepated then it is laurelled. Torre is not addlepated.", "logic": "\nPeccable(jess)\nSaxicoline(jess)\nVendible(jess)\nLaurelled(jess)\nPeccable(torre)\nVendible(torre)\nPeccable(nataline)\nAddlepated(nataline)\nSaxicoline(nataline)\nVendible(nataline)\nPeccable(sibbie)\nAddlepated(sibbie)\nWholemeal(sibbie)\nIlliterate(sibbie)\nVendible(sibbie)\nLaurelled(sibbie)\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Peccable(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Addlepated(x))\nLaurelled(jess) and Peccable(jess) -> Saxicoline(jess)\nforall x (Laurelled(x) and Vendible(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nWholemeal(sibbie) and Laurelled(sibbie) -> Vendible(sibbie)\nforall x (Addlepated(x) -> Laurelled(x))\n\nnot Addlepated(torre)\n\nVendible(torre) and forall x (Vendible(x) -> Addlepated(x)) -> therefore Addlepated(torre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Agata is fecund. Agata is biased. Agata is quechuan. Agata is rectified. Kacie is fecund. Kacie is quechuan. Virgilio is fecund. Virgilio is southwest. Virgilio is biased. Virgilio is quechuan. Francoise is fecund. Francoise is southwest. Francoise is sterilized. Francoise is calceiform. Francoise is quechuan. Francoise is rectified. If something is quechuan then it is fecund. If something is quechuan then it is southwest. If Agata is rectified and Agata is fecund then Agata is biased. All rectified, quechuan things are sterilized. If Francoise is sterilized and Francoise is rectified then Francoise is quechuan. If something is southwest then it is rectified. Virgilio is sterilized.", "logic": "\nFecund(agata)\nBiased(agata)\nQuechuan(agata)\nRectified(agata)\nFecund(kacie)\nQuechuan(kacie)\nFecund(virgilio)\nSouthwest(virgilio)\nBiased(virgilio)\nQuechuan(virgilio)\nFecund(francoise)\nSouthwest(francoise)\nSterilized(francoise)\nCalceiform(francoise)\nQuechuan(francoise)\nRectified(francoise)\nforall x (Quechuan(x) -> Fecund(x))\nforall x (Quechuan(x) -> Southwest(x))\nRectified(agata) and Fecund(agata) -> Biased(agata)\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Quechuan(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nSterilized(francoise) and Rectified(francoise) -> Quechuan(francoise)\nforall x (Southwest(x) -> Rectified(x))\n\nSterilized(virgilio)\n\nSouthwest(virgilio) and forall x (Southwest(x) -> Rectified(x)) -> therefore Rectified(virgilio) Rectified(virgilio) and Quechuan(virgilio) and forall x (Rectified(x) and Quechuan(x) -> Sterilized(x)) -> therefore Sterilized(virgilio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Meghan is forested. Meghan is deathlike. Meghan is busy. Meghan is selfish. Gabriell is forested. Gabriell is busy. Kalvin is forested. Kalvin is returnable. Kalvin is deathlike. Kalvin is busy. Arvin is forested. Arvin is returnable. Arvin is forested. Arvin is boylike. Arvin is busy. Arvin is selfish. If something is busy then it is forested. If something is busy then it is returnable. If Meghan is selfish and Meghan is forested then Meghan is deathlike. All selfish, busy things are forested. If Arvin is forested and Arvin is selfish then Arvin is busy. If something is returnable then it is selfish. Gabriell is not selfish.", "logic": "\nForested(meghan)\nDeathlike(meghan)\nBusy(meghan)\nSelfish(meghan)\nForested(gabriell)\nBusy(gabriell)\nForested(kalvin)\nReturnable(kalvin)\nDeathlike(kalvin)\nBusy(kalvin)\nForested(arvin)\nReturnable(arvin)\nForested(arvin)\nBoylike(arvin)\nBusy(arvin)\nSelfish(arvin)\nforall x (Busy(x) -> Forested(x))\nforall x (Busy(x) -> Returnable(x))\nSelfish(meghan) and Forested(meghan) -> Deathlike(meghan)\nforall x (Selfish(x) and Busy(x) -> Forested(x))\nForested(arvin) and Selfish(arvin) -> Busy(arvin)\nforall x (Returnable(x) -> Selfish(x))\n\nnot Selfish(gabriell)\n\nBusy(gabriell) and forall x (Busy(x) -> Returnable(x)) -> therefore Returnable(gabriell) Returnable(gabriell) and forall x (Returnable(x) -> Selfish(x)) -> therefore Selfish(gabriell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Hamnet is metabolous. Hamnet is autonomous. Hamnet is immense. Hamnet is didactic. Siana is metabolous. Siana is immense. Opaline is metabolous. Opaline is succulent. Opaline is autonomous. Opaline is immense. Martica is metabolous. Martica is succulent. Martica is throated. Martica is mute. Martica is immense. Martica is didactic. If something is immense then it is metabolous. If something is immense then it is succulent. If Hamnet is didactic and Hamnet is metabolous then Hamnet is autonomous. All didactic, immense things are throated. If Martica is throated and Martica is didactic then Martica is immense. If something is succulent then it is didactic. Siana is throated.", "logic": "\nMetabolous(hamnet)\nAutonomous(hamnet)\nImmense(hamnet)\nDidactic(hamnet)\nMetabolous(siana)\nImmense(siana)\nMetabolous(opaline)\nSucculent(opaline)\nAutonomous(opaline)\nImmense(opaline)\nMetabolous(martica)\nSucculent(martica)\nThroated(martica)\nMute(martica)\nImmense(martica)\nDidactic(martica)\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Metabolous(x))\nforall x (Immense(x) -> Succulent(x))\nDidactic(hamnet) and Metabolous(hamnet) -> Autonomous(hamnet)\nforall x (Didactic(x) and Immense(x) -> Throated(x))\nThroated(martica) and Didactic(martica) -> Immense(martica)\nforall x (Succulent(x) -> Didactic(x))\n\nThroated(siana)\n\nImmense(siana) and forall x (Immense(x) -> Succulent(x)) -> therefore Succulent(siana) Succulent(siana) and forall x (Succulent(x) -> Didactic(x)) -> therefore Didactic(siana) Didactic(siana) and Immense(siana) and forall x (Didactic(x) and Immense(x) -> Throated(x)) -> therefore Throated(siana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Stefanie is subjugated. Stefanie is sniffy. Stefanie is pastoral. Stefanie is achy. Nicky is subjugated. Nicky is pastoral. Kitty is subjugated. Kitty is springy. Kitty is sniffy. Kitty is pastoral. Flor is subjugated. Flor is springy. Flor is hebrew. Flor is larval. Flor is pastoral. Flor is achy. If something is pastoral then it is subjugated. If something is pastoral then it is springy. If Stefanie is achy and Stefanie is subjugated then Stefanie is sniffy. All achy, pastoral things are hebrew. If Flor is hebrew and Flor is achy then Flor is pastoral. If something is springy then it is achy. Nicky is not hebrew.", "logic": "\nSubjugated(stefanie)\nSniffy(stefanie)\nPastoral(stefanie)\nAchy(stefanie)\nSubjugated(nicky)\nPastoral(nicky)\nSubjugated(kitty)\nSpringy(kitty)\nSniffy(kitty)\nPastoral(kitty)\nSubjugated(flor)\nSpringy(flor)\nHebrew(flor)\nLarval(flor)\nPastoral(flor)\nAchy(flor)\nforall x (Pastoral(x) -> Subjugated(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) -> Springy(x))\nAchy(stefanie) and Subjugated(stefanie) -> Sniffy(stefanie)\nforall x (Achy(x) and Pastoral(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nHebrew(flor) and Achy(flor) -> Pastoral(flor)\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Achy(x))\n\nnot Hebrew(nicky)\n\nPastoral(nicky) and forall x (Pastoral(x) -> Springy(x)) -> therefore Springy(nicky) Springy(nicky) and forall x (Springy(x) -> Achy(x)) -> therefore Achy(nicky) Achy(nicky) and Pastoral(nicky) and forall x (Achy(x) and Pastoral(x) -> Hebrew(x)) -> therefore Hebrew(nicky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Melisa is rawboned. Melisa is eyelike. Melisa is unlogical. Melisa is brawny. Mackenzie is rawboned. Mackenzie is unlogical. Joannes is rawboned. Joannes is abiding. Joannes is eyelike. Joannes is unlogical. Barrie is rawboned. Barrie is abiding. Barrie is pectic. Barrie is amphoric. Barrie is unlogical. Barrie is brawny. If something is unlogical then it is rawboned. If something is unlogical then it is abiding. If Melisa is brawny and Melisa is rawboned then Melisa is eyelike. All brawny, unlogical things are pectic. If Barrie is pectic and Barrie is brawny then Barrie is unlogical. If something is abiding then it is brawny. Mackenzie is not eyelike.", "logic": "\nRawboned(melisa)\nEyelike(melisa)\nUnlogical(melisa)\nBrawny(melisa)\nRawboned(mackenzie)\nUnlogical(mackenzie)\nRawboned(joannes)\nAbiding(joannes)\nEyelike(joannes)\nUnlogical(joannes)\nRawboned(barrie)\nAbiding(barrie)\nPectic(barrie)\nAmphoric(barrie)\nUnlogical(barrie)\nBrawny(barrie)\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> Rawboned(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> Abiding(x))\nBrawny(melisa) and Rawboned(melisa) -> Eyelike(melisa)\nforall x (Brawny(x) and Unlogical(x) -> Pectic(x))\nPectic(barrie) and Brawny(barrie) -> Unlogical(barrie)\nforall x (Abiding(x) -> Brawny(x))\n\nnot Eyelike(mackenzie)\n\nnot Eyelike(mackenzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Karmen is murmurous. Karmen is chief. Karmen is zoological. Karmen is malcontent. Sharia is murmurous. Sharia is zoological. Shamit is murmurous. Shamit is dendritic. Shamit is chief. Shamit is zoological. Troy is murmurous. Troy is dendritic. Troy is ensiform. Troy is chopfallen. Troy is zoological. Troy is malcontent. If something is zoological then it is murmurous. If something is zoological then it is dendritic. If Karmen is malcontent and Karmen is murmurous then Karmen is chief. All malcontent, zoological things are ensiform. If Troy is ensiform and Troy is malcontent then Troy is zoological. If something is dendritic then it is malcontent. Sharia is chopfallen.", "logic": "\nMurmurous(karmen)\nChief(karmen)\nZoological(karmen)\nMalcontent(karmen)\nMurmurous(sharia)\nZoological(sharia)\nMurmurous(shamit)\nDendritic(shamit)\nChief(shamit)\nZoological(shamit)\nMurmurous(troy)\nDendritic(troy)\nEnsiform(troy)\nChopfallen(troy)\nZoological(troy)\nMalcontent(troy)\nforall x (Zoological(x) -> Murmurous(x))\nforall x (Zoological(x) -> Dendritic(x))\nMalcontent(karmen) and Murmurous(karmen) -> Chief(karmen)\nforall x (Malcontent(x) and Zoological(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nEnsiform(troy) and Malcontent(troy) -> Zoological(troy)\nforall x (Dendritic(x) -> Malcontent(x))\n\nChopfallen(sharia)\n\nChopfallen(sharia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Wallie is unripened. Wallie is fleeceable. Wallie is frowsy. Wallie is dialectic. Rajeev is unripened. Rajeev is frowsy. Hally is unripened. Hally is monastical. Hally is fleeceable. Hally is frowsy. Gunter is unripened. Gunter is monastical. Gunter is lowland. Gunter is cardinal. Gunter is frowsy. Gunter is dialectic. If something is frowsy then it is unripened. If something is frowsy then it is monastical. If Wallie is dialectic and Wallie is unripened then Wallie is fleeceable. All dialectic, frowsy things are lowland. If Gunter is lowland and Gunter is dialectic then Gunter is frowsy. If something is monastical then it is dialectic. Gunter is not fleeceable.", "logic": "\nUnripened(wallie)\nFleeceable(wallie)\nFrowsy(wallie)\nDialectic(wallie)\nUnripened(rajeev)\nFrowsy(rajeev)\nUnripened(hally)\nMonastical(hally)\nFleeceable(hally)\nFrowsy(hally)\nUnripened(gunter)\nMonastical(gunter)\nLowland(gunter)\nCardinal(gunter)\nFrowsy(gunter)\nDialectic(gunter)\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Unripened(x))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Monastical(x))\nDialectic(wallie) and Unripened(wallie) -> Fleeceable(wallie)\nforall x (Dialectic(x) and Frowsy(x) -> Lowland(x))\nLowland(gunter) and Dialectic(gunter) -> Frowsy(gunter)\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> Dialectic(x))\n\nnot Fleeceable(gunter)\n\nnot Fleeceable(gunter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "Chandra is thriftless. Chandra is fleshly. Chandra is tympanitic. Chandra is serious. Spense is thriftless. Spense is tympanitic. Beau is thriftless. Beau is ribald. Beau is fleshly. Beau is tympanitic. Cecilla is thriftless. Cecilla is ribald. Cecilla is lingual. Cecilla is oecumenic. Cecilla is tympanitic. Cecilla is serious. If something is tympanitic then it is thriftless. If something is tympanitic then it is ribald. If Chandra is serious and Chandra is thriftless then Chandra is fleshly. All serious, tympanitic things are lingual. If Cecilla is lingual and Cecilla is serious then Cecilla is tympanitic. If something is ribald then it is serious. Beau is oecumenic.", "logic": "\nThriftless(chandra)\nFleshly(chandra)\nTympanitic(chandra)\nSerious(chandra)\nThriftless(spense)\nTympanitic(spense)\nThriftless(beau)\nRibald(beau)\nFleshly(beau)\nTympanitic(beau)\nThriftless(cecilla)\nRibald(cecilla)\nLingual(cecilla)\nOecumenic(cecilla)\nTympanitic(cecilla)\nSerious(cecilla)\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Thriftless(x))\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Ribald(x))\nSerious(chandra) and Thriftless(chandra) -> Fleshly(chandra)\nforall x (Serious(x) and Tympanitic(x) -> Lingual(x))\nLingual(cecilla) and Serious(cecilla) -> Tympanitic(cecilla)\nforall x (Ribald(x) -> Serious(x))\n\nOecumenic(beau)\n\nOecumenic(beau) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1559"} {"premises": "The lorelei is brushy. The carlita is callable. If someone is callable then they need the lorelei. If someone soak the lorelei then the lorelei is erasable. If someone soak the lorelei then the lorelei is callable. If someone alloy the lorelei and the lorelei alloy the carlita then the carlita is erasable. If someone is brushy and they chase the carlita then they do not chase the lorelei. If someone alloy the lorelei and the lorelei is bombproof then they see the carlita. The carlita is callable.", "logic": "\nBrushy(lorelei)\nCallable(carlita)\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Soak(x, lorelei))\nforall x (Soak(x, lorelei) -> Erasable(lorelei))\nforall x (Soak(x, lorelei) -> Callable(lorelei))\nforall x (Alloy(x, lorelei) and Alloy(lorelei, carlita) -> Erasable(carlita))\nforall x (Brushy(x) and Alloy(x, carlita) -> not Alloy(x, lorelei))\nforall x (Alloy(x, lorelei) and Bombproof(lorelei) -> Speck(x, carlita))\n\nCallable(carlita)\n\ntherefore Callable(carlita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The zeb is pontifical. The alene is projecting. If someone is projecting then they need the zeb. If someone terrasse the zeb then the zeb is credal. If someone terrasse the zeb then the zeb is projecting. If someone fantasy the zeb and the zeb fantasy the alene then the alene is credal. If someone is pontifical and they chase the alene then they do not chase the zeb. If someone fantasy the zeb and the zeb is croatian then they see the alene. The alene is not projecting.", "logic": "\nPontifical(zeb)\nProjecting(alene)\nforall x (Projecting(x) -> Terrasse(x, zeb))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, zeb) -> Credal(zeb))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, zeb) -> Projecting(zeb))\nforall x (Fantasy(x, zeb) and Fantasy(zeb, alene) -> Credal(alene))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) and Fantasy(x, alene) -> not Fantasy(x, zeb))\nforall x (Fantasy(x, zeb) and Croatian(zeb) -> Alloy(x, alene))\n\nnot Projecting(alene)\n\ntherefore Projecting(alene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The dwaine is quadruple. The lyndel is alular. If someone is alular then they need the dwaine. If someone hazard the dwaine then the dwaine is ultra. If someone hazard the dwaine then the dwaine is alular. If someone trawl the dwaine and the dwaine trawl the lyndel then the lyndel is ultra. If someone is quadruple and they chase the lyndel then they do not chase the dwaine. If someone trawl the dwaine and the dwaine is bare then they see the lyndel. The lyndel hazard the dwaine.", "logic": "\nQuadruple(dwaine)\nAlular(lyndel)\nforall x (Alular(x) -> Hazard(x, dwaine))\nforall x (Hazard(x, dwaine) -> Ultra(dwaine))\nforall x (Hazard(x, dwaine) -> Alular(dwaine))\nforall x (Trawl(x, dwaine) and Trawl(dwaine, lyndel) -> Ultra(lyndel))\nforall x (Quadruple(x) and Trawl(x, lyndel) -> not Trawl(x, dwaine))\nforall x (Trawl(x, dwaine) and Bare(dwaine) -> Vituperate(x, lyndel))\n\nHazard(lyndel, dwaine)\n\nAlular(lyndel) and forall x (Alular(x) -> Hazard(x, dwaine)) -> therefore Hazard(lyndel, dwaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The garwin is globular. The freemon is helpless. If someone is helpless then they need the garwin. If someone emplane the garwin then the garwin is actuarial. If someone emplane the garwin then the garwin is helpless. If someone double the garwin and the garwin double the freemon then the freemon is actuarial. If someone is globular and they chase the freemon then they do not chase the garwin. If someone double the garwin and the garwin is acephalous then they see the freemon. The freemon does not need the garwin.", "logic": "\nGlobular(garwin)\nHelpless(freemon)\nforall x (Helpless(x) -> Emplane(x, garwin))\nforall x (Emplane(x, garwin) -> Actuarial(garwin))\nforall x (Emplane(x, garwin) -> Helpless(garwin))\nforall x (Double(x, garwin) and Double(garwin, freemon) -> Actuarial(freemon))\nforall x (Globular(x) and Double(x, freemon) -> not Double(x, garwin))\nforall x (Double(x, garwin) and Acephalous(garwin) -> Demoralize(x, freemon))\n\nnot Emplane(freemon, garwin)\n\nHelpless(freemon) and forall x (Helpless(x) -> Emplane(x, garwin)) -> therefore Emplane(freemon, garwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The zack is cenobitic. The kin is torrid. If someone is torrid then they need the zack. If someone lower the zack then the zack is orthogonal. If someone lower the zack then the zack is torrid. If someone annul the zack and the zack annul the kin then the kin is orthogonal. If someone is cenobitic and they chase the kin then they do not chase the zack. If someone annul the zack and the zack is flyaway then they see the kin. The zack is torrid.", "logic": "\nCenobitic(zack)\nTorrid(kin)\nforall x (Torrid(x) -> Lower(x, zack))\nforall x (Lower(x, zack) -> Orthogonal(zack))\nforall x (Lower(x, zack) -> Torrid(zack))\nforall x (Annul(x, zack) and Annul(zack, kin) -> Orthogonal(kin))\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) and Annul(x, kin) -> not Annul(x, zack))\nforall x (Annul(x, zack) and Flyaway(zack) -> Reverence(x, kin))\n\nTorrid(zack)\n\nTorrid(kin) and forall x (Torrid(x) -> Lower(x, zack)) -> therefore Lower(kin, zack) Lower(kin, zack) and forall x (Lower(x, zack) -> Torrid(zack)) -> therefore Torrid(zack)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The johnathon is louvered. The stevy is sniffly. If someone is sniffly then they need the johnathon. If someone mummify the johnathon then the johnathon is mesic. If someone mummify the johnathon then the johnathon is sniffly. If someone cohere the johnathon and the johnathon cohere the stevy then the stevy is mesic. If someone is louvered and they chase the stevy then they do not chase the johnathon. If someone cohere the johnathon and the johnathon is mandaean then they see the stevy. The johnathon is not mesic.", "logic": "\nLouvered(johnathon)\nSniffly(stevy)\nforall x (Sniffly(x) -> Mummify(x, johnathon))\nforall x (Mummify(x, johnathon) -> Mesic(johnathon))\nforall x (Mummify(x, johnathon) -> Sniffly(johnathon))\nforall x (Cohere(x, johnathon) and Cohere(johnathon, stevy) -> Mesic(stevy))\nforall x (Louvered(x) and Cohere(x, stevy) -> not Cohere(x, johnathon))\nforall x (Cohere(x, johnathon) and Mandaean(johnathon) -> Clench(x, stevy))\n\nnot Mesic(johnathon)\n\nSniffly(stevy) and forall x (Sniffly(x) -> Mummify(x, johnathon)) -> therefore Mummify(stevy, johnathon) Mummify(stevy, johnathon) and forall x (Mummify(x, johnathon) -> Mesic(johnathon)) -> therefore Mesic(johnathon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The ruthe is busted. The matthieu is domestic. If someone is domestic then they need the ruthe. If someone site the ruthe then the ruthe is buoyant. If someone site the ruthe then the ruthe is domestic. If someone federalize the ruthe and the ruthe federalize the matthieu then the matthieu is buoyant. If someone is busted and they chase the matthieu then they do not chase the ruthe. If someone federalize the ruthe and the ruthe is stannous then they see the matthieu. The ruthe site the ruthe.", "logic": "\nBusted(ruthe)\nDomestic(matthieu)\nforall x (Domestic(x) -> Site(x, ruthe))\nforall x (Site(x, ruthe) -> Buoyant(ruthe))\nforall x (Site(x, ruthe) -> Domestic(ruthe))\nforall x (Federalize(x, ruthe) and Federalize(ruthe, matthieu) -> Buoyant(matthieu))\nforall x (Busted(x) and Federalize(x, matthieu) -> not Federalize(x, ruthe))\nforall x (Federalize(x, ruthe) and Stannous(ruthe) -> Restrict(x, matthieu))\n\nSite(ruthe, ruthe)\n\nDomestic(matthieu) and forall x (Domestic(x) -> Site(x, ruthe)) -> therefore Site(matthieu, ruthe) Site(matthieu, ruthe) and forall x (Site(x, ruthe) -> Domestic(ruthe)) -> therefore Domestic(ruthe) Domestic(ruthe) and forall x (Domestic(x) -> Site(x, ruthe)) -> therefore Site(ruthe, ruthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The roobbie is sociable. The dyane is stoic. If someone is stoic then they need the roobbie. If someone replete the roobbie then the roobbie is rococo. If someone replete the roobbie then the roobbie is stoic. If someone oyster the roobbie and the roobbie oyster the dyane then the dyane is rococo. If someone is sociable and they chase the dyane then they do not chase the roobbie. If someone oyster the roobbie and the roobbie is modish then they see the dyane. The roobbie does not need the roobbie.", "logic": "\nSociable(roobbie)\nStoic(dyane)\nforall x (Stoic(x) -> Replete(x, roobbie))\nforall x (Replete(x, roobbie) -> Rococo(roobbie))\nforall x (Replete(x, roobbie) -> Stoic(roobbie))\nforall x (Oyster(x, roobbie) and Oyster(roobbie, dyane) -> Rococo(dyane))\nforall x (Sociable(x) and Oyster(x, dyane) -> not Oyster(x, roobbie))\nforall x (Oyster(x, roobbie) and Modish(roobbie) -> Subtract(x, dyane))\n\nnot Replete(roobbie, roobbie)\n\nStoic(dyane) and forall x (Stoic(x) -> Replete(x, roobbie)) -> therefore Replete(dyane, roobbie) Replete(dyane, roobbie) and forall x (Replete(x, roobbie) -> Stoic(roobbie)) -> therefore Stoic(roobbie) Stoic(roobbie) and forall x (Stoic(x) -> Replete(x, roobbie)) -> therefore Replete(roobbie, roobbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The glenine is acinar. The lissi is masterly. If someone is masterly then they need the glenine. If someone ignite the glenine then the glenine is henpecked. If someone ignite the glenine then the glenine is masterly. If someone apply the glenine and the glenine apply the lissi then the lissi is henpecked. If someone is acinar and they chase the lissi then they do not chase the glenine. If someone apply the glenine and the glenine is ordinal then they see the lissi. The lissi is not henpecked.", "logic": "\nAcinar(glenine)\nMasterly(lissi)\nforall x (Masterly(x) -> Ignite(x, glenine))\nforall x (Ignite(x, glenine) -> Henpecked(glenine))\nforall x (Ignite(x, glenine) -> Masterly(glenine))\nforall x (Apply(x, glenine) and Apply(glenine, lissi) -> Henpecked(lissi))\nforall x (Acinar(x) and Apply(x, lissi) -> not Apply(x, glenine))\nforall x (Apply(x, glenine) and Ordinal(glenine) -> Shop(x, lissi))\n\nnot Henpecked(lissi)\n\nforall x (Apply(x, glenine) and Apply(glenine, lissi) -> Henpecked(lissi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The alena is wearisome. The jolene is alienable. If someone is alienable then they need the alena. If someone upgrade the alena then the alena is semipublic. If someone upgrade the alena then the alena is alienable. If someone applaud the alena and the alena applaud the jolene then the jolene is semipublic. If someone is wearisome and they chase the jolene then they do not chase the alena. If someone applaud the alena and the alena is unromantic then they see the jolene. The alena impose the jolene.", "logic": "\nWearisome(alena)\nAlienable(jolene)\nforall x (Alienable(x) -> Upgrade(x, alena))\nforall x (Upgrade(x, alena) -> Semipublic(alena))\nforall x (Upgrade(x, alena) -> Alienable(alena))\nforall x (Applaud(x, alena) and Applaud(alena, jolene) -> Semipublic(jolene))\nforall x (Wearisome(x) and Applaud(x, jolene) -> not Applaud(x, alena))\nforall x (Applaud(x, alena) and Unromantic(alena) -> Impose(x, jolene))\n\nImpose(alena, jolene)\n\nforall x (Applaud(x, alena) and Unromantic(alena) -> Impose(x, jolene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The phoebe is projecting. The romola is pathless. If someone is pathless then they need the phoebe. If someone sift the phoebe then the phoebe is baccate. If someone sift the phoebe then the phoebe is pathless. If someone trivialize the phoebe and the phoebe trivialize the romola then the romola is baccate. If someone is projecting and they chase the romola then they do not chase the phoebe. If someone trivialize the phoebe and the phoebe is unpierced then they see the romola. The romola does not see the romola.", "logic": "\nProjecting(phoebe)\nPathless(romola)\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> Sift(x, phoebe))\nforall x (Sift(x, phoebe) -> Baccate(phoebe))\nforall x (Sift(x, phoebe) -> Pathless(phoebe))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, phoebe) and Trivialize(phoebe, romola) -> Baccate(romola))\nforall x (Projecting(x) and Trivialize(x, romola) -> not Trivialize(x, phoebe))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, phoebe) and Unpierced(phoebe) -> Recommit(x, romola))\n\nnot Recommit(romola, romola)\n\nforall x (Trivialize(x, phoebe) and Unpierced(phoebe) -> Recommit(x, romola)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The antonetta is inguinal. The tatum is robustious. If someone is robustious then they need the antonetta. If someone supple the antonetta then the antonetta is obsessed. If someone supple the antonetta then the antonetta is robustious. If someone resign the antonetta and the antonetta resign the tatum then the tatum is obsessed. If someone is inguinal and they chase the tatum then they do not chase the antonetta. If someone resign the antonetta and the antonetta is vapourish then they see the tatum. The antonetta is cold.", "logic": "\nInguinal(antonetta)\nRobustious(tatum)\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> Supple(x, antonetta))\nforall x (Supple(x, antonetta) -> Obsessed(antonetta))\nforall x (Supple(x, antonetta) -> Robustious(antonetta))\nforall x (Resign(x, antonetta) and Resign(antonetta, tatum) -> Obsessed(tatum))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) and Resign(x, tatum) -> not Resign(x, antonetta))\nforall x (Resign(x, antonetta) and Vapourish(antonetta) -> Relapse(x, tatum))\n\nCold(antonetta)\n\nCold(antonetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The sheffield is cuspate. The berry is ruminant. If someone is ruminant then they need the sheffield. If someone vitalise the sheffield then the sheffield is cheeky. If someone vitalise the sheffield then the sheffield is ruminant. If someone downsize the sheffield and the sheffield downsize the berry then the berry is cheeky. If someone is cuspate and they chase the berry then they do not chase the sheffield. If someone downsize the sheffield and the sheffield is thorny then they see the berry. The berry does not need the berry.", "logic": "\nCuspate(sheffield)\nRuminant(berry)\nforall x (Ruminant(x) -> Vitalise(x, sheffield))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, sheffield) -> Cheeky(sheffield))\nforall x (Vitalise(x, sheffield) -> Ruminant(sheffield))\nforall x (Downsize(x, sheffield) and Downsize(sheffield, berry) -> Cheeky(berry))\nforall x (Cuspate(x) and Downsize(x, berry) -> not Downsize(x, sheffield))\nforall x (Downsize(x, sheffield) and Thorny(sheffield) -> Tweak(x, berry))\n\nnot Vitalise(berry, berry)\n\nnot Vitalise(berry, berry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The lucius is legato. The caspar is disrupted. If someone is disrupted then they need the lucius. If someone shrug the lucius then the lucius is burned. If someone shrug the lucius then the lucius is disrupted. If someone number the lucius and the lucius number the caspar then the caspar is burned. If someone is legato and they chase the caspar then they do not chase the lucius. If someone number the lucius and the lucius is bahraini then they see the caspar. The lucius number the lucius.", "logic": "\nLegato(lucius)\nDisrupted(caspar)\nforall x (Disrupted(x) -> Shrug(x, lucius))\nforall x (Shrug(x, lucius) -> Burned(lucius))\nforall x (Shrug(x, lucius) -> Disrupted(lucius))\nforall x (Number(x, lucius) and Number(lucius, caspar) -> Burned(caspar))\nforall x (Legato(x) and Number(x, caspar) -> not Number(x, lucius))\nforall x (Number(x, lucius) and Bahraini(lucius) -> Slay(x, caspar))\n\nNumber(lucius, lucius)\n\nNumber(lucius, lucius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The cathryn is streetwise. The bill is vagabond. If someone is vagabond then they need the cathryn. If someone accede the cathryn then the cathryn is snub. If someone accede the cathryn then the cathryn is vagabond. If someone speckle the cathryn and the cathryn speckle the bill then the bill is snub. If someone is streetwise and they chase the bill then they do not chase the cathryn. If someone speckle the cathryn and the cathryn is fabian then they see the bill. The bill does not chase the cathryn.", "logic": "\nStreetwise(cathryn)\nVagabond(bill)\nforall x (Vagabond(x) -> Accede(x, cathryn))\nforall x (Accede(x, cathryn) -> Snub(cathryn))\nforall x (Accede(x, cathryn) -> Vagabond(cathryn))\nforall x (Speckle(x, cathryn) and Speckle(cathryn, bill) -> Snub(bill))\nforall x (Streetwise(x) and Speckle(x, bill) -> not Speckle(x, cathryn))\nforall x (Speckle(x, cathryn) and Fabian(cathryn) -> Contract(x, bill))\n\nnot Speckle(bill, cathryn)\n\nnot Speckle(bill, cathryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The pearce is felted. The hewitt is thorough. If someone is thorough then they need the pearce. If someone riffle the pearce then the pearce is vinegarish. If someone riffle the pearce then the pearce is thorough. If someone disturb the pearce and the pearce disturb the hewitt then the hewitt is vinegarish. If someone is felted and they chase the hewitt then they do not chase the pearce. If someone disturb the pearce and the pearce is aphyllous then they see the hewitt. The hewitt is aphyllous.", "logic": "\nFelted(pearce)\nThorough(hewitt)\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Riffle(x, pearce))\nforall x (Riffle(x, pearce) -> Vinegarish(pearce))\nforall x (Riffle(x, pearce) -> Thorough(pearce))\nforall x (Disturb(x, pearce) and Disturb(pearce, hewitt) -> Vinegarish(hewitt))\nforall x (Felted(x) and Disturb(x, hewitt) -> not Disturb(x, pearce))\nforall x (Disturb(x, pearce) and Aphyllous(pearce) -> Platinize(x, hewitt))\n\nAphyllous(hewitt)\n\nAphyllous(hewitt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The irvine creosote the konstance. The irvine creosote the pearle. The irvine alcoholise the pearle. The konstance creosote the pearle. The konstance is wordless. The konstance alcoholise the irvine. The pearle extrude the konstance. Round things are not laconic. If something alcoholise the konstance then the konstance creosote the irvine. The irvine creosote the pearle.", "logic": "\nCreosote(irvine, konstance)\nCreosote(irvine, pearle)\nAlcoholise(irvine, pearle)\nCreosote(konstance, pearle)\nWordless(konstance)\nAlcoholise(konstance, irvine)\nExtrude(pearle, konstance)\nforall x (Brassbound(x) -> not Laconic(x))\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, konstance) -> Creosote(konstance, irvine))\n\nCreosote(irvine, pearle)\n\ntherefore Creosote(irvine, pearle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6044"} {"premises": "The blinny pith the enid. The blinny pith the hinda. The blinny clamour the hinda. The enid pith the hinda. The enid is unbacked. The enid clamour the blinny. The hinda twist the enid. Round things are not carboxyl. If something clamour the enid then the enid pith the blinny. The blinny does not eat the hinda.", "logic": "\nPith(blinny, enid)\nPith(blinny, hinda)\nClamour(blinny, hinda)\nPith(enid, hinda)\nUnbacked(enid)\nClamour(enid, blinny)\nTwist(hinda, enid)\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> not Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Clamour(x, enid) -> Pith(enid, blinny))\n\nnot Pith(blinny, hinda)\n\ntherefore Pith(blinny, hinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6044"} {"premises": "The thekla decollate the tania. The thekla decollate the ailee. The thekla reinstall the ailee. The tania decollate the ailee. The tania is groggy. The tania reinstall the thekla. The ailee melodise the tania. Round things are not adenoid. If something reinstall the tania then the tania decollate the thekla. The tania does not eat the thekla.", "logic": "\nDecollate(thekla, tania)\nDecollate(thekla, ailee)\nReinstall(thekla, ailee)\nDecollate(tania, ailee)\nGroggy(tania)\nReinstall(tania, thekla)\nMelodise(ailee, tania)\nforall x (Incomplete(x) -> not Adenoid(x))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, tania) -> Decollate(tania, thekla))\n\nnot Decollate(tania, thekla)\n\nforall x (Reinstall(x, tania) -> Decollate(tania, thekla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6044"} {"premises": "The seamus lengthen the aleda. The seamus lengthen the lynda. The seamus swill the lynda. The aleda lengthen the lynda. The aleda is apterous. The aleda swill the seamus. The lynda acquit the aleda. Round things are not viral. If something swill the aleda then the aleda lengthen the seamus. The lynda lengthen the lynda.", "logic": "\nLengthen(seamus, aleda)\nLengthen(seamus, lynda)\nSwill(seamus, lynda)\nLengthen(aleda, lynda)\nApterous(aleda)\nSwill(aleda, seamus)\nAcquit(lynda, aleda)\nforall x (Hysteric(x) -> not Viral(x))\nforall x (Swill(x, aleda) -> Lengthen(aleda, seamus))\n\nLengthen(lynda, lynda)\n\nLengthen(lynda, lynda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6044"} {"premises": "The flor unstuff the michail. The norry harshen the michail. The michail is naturistic. The annadiane is getable. If something unstuff the flor and it disgorge the annadiane then the annadiane disgorge the michail. If something is naturistic then it unstuff the norry. If something unstuff the norry then the norry harshen the flor. If the norry harshen the michail then the norry is beauteous. If something disgorge the annadiane and the annadiane unstuff the norry then the norry unstuff the annadiane. If something harshen the michail and it harshen the flor then the flor unstuff the annadiane. The michail is naturistic.", "logic": "\nUnstuff(flor, michail)\nHarshen(norry, michail)\nNaturistic(michail)\nGetable(annadiane)\nforall x (Unstuff(x, flor) and Disgorge(x, annadiane) -> Disgorge(annadiane, michail))\nforall x (Naturistic(x) -> Unstuff(x, norry))\nforall x (Unstuff(x, norry) -> Harshen(norry, flor))\nHarshen(norry, michail) -> Beauteous(norry)\nforall x (Disgorge(x, annadiane) and Unstuff(annadiane, norry) -> Unstuff(norry, annadiane))\nforall x (Harshen(x, michail) and Harshen(x, flor) -> Unstuff(flor, annadiane))\n\nNaturistic(michail)\n\ntherefore Naturistic(michail)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The ruby reacquaint the adrienne. The hermann mesh the adrienne. The adrienne is scandent. The delinda is aestival. If something reacquaint the ruby and it berry the delinda then the delinda berry the adrienne. If something is scandent then it reacquaint the hermann. If something reacquaint the hermann then the hermann mesh the ruby. If the hermann mesh the adrienne then the hermann is anorexic. If something berry the delinda and the delinda reacquaint the hermann then the hermann reacquaint the delinda. If something mesh the adrienne and it mesh the ruby then the ruby reacquaint the delinda. The adrienne is not scandent.", "logic": "\nReacquaint(ruby, adrienne)\nMesh(hermann, adrienne)\nScandent(adrienne)\nAestival(delinda)\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, ruby) and Berry(x, delinda) -> Berry(delinda, adrienne))\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Reacquaint(x, hermann))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, hermann) -> Mesh(hermann, ruby))\nMesh(hermann, adrienne) -> Anorexic(hermann)\nforall x (Berry(x, delinda) and Reacquaint(delinda, hermann) -> Reacquaint(hermann, delinda))\nforall x (Mesh(x, adrienne) and Mesh(x, ruby) -> Reacquaint(ruby, delinda))\n\nnot Scandent(adrienne)\n\ntherefore Scandent(adrienne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The emalia mistime the rosette. The gabrielle trudge the rosette. The rosette is neckless. The gunther is leftish. If something mistime the emalia and it agitate the gunther then the gunther agitate the rosette. If something is neckless then it mistime the gabrielle. If something mistime the gabrielle then the gabrielle trudge the emalia. If the gabrielle trudge the rosette then the gabrielle is sublimate. If something agitate the gunther and the gunther mistime the gabrielle then the gabrielle mistime the gunther. If something trudge the rosette and it trudge the emalia then the emalia mistime the gunther. The rosette mistime the gabrielle.", "logic": "\nMistime(emalia, rosette)\nTrudge(gabrielle, rosette)\nNeckless(rosette)\nLeftish(gunther)\nforall x (Mistime(x, emalia) and Agitate(x, gunther) -> Agitate(gunther, rosette))\nforall x (Neckless(x) -> Mistime(x, gabrielle))\nforall x (Mistime(x, gabrielle) -> Trudge(gabrielle, emalia))\nTrudge(gabrielle, rosette) -> Sublimate(gabrielle)\nforall x (Agitate(x, gunther) and Mistime(gunther, gabrielle) -> Mistime(gabrielle, gunther))\nforall x (Trudge(x, rosette) and Trudge(x, emalia) -> Mistime(emalia, gunther))\n\nMistime(rosette, gabrielle)\n\nNeckless(rosette) and forall x (Neckless(x) -> Mistime(x, gabrielle)) -> therefore Mistime(rosette, gabrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The julee refuel the keely. The cleo refashion the keely. The keely is parvenue. The martita is perceived. If something refuel the julee and it refill the martita then the martita refill the keely. If something is parvenue then it refuel the cleo. If something refuel the cleo then the cleo refashion the julee. If the cleo refashion the keely then the cleo is undaunted. If something refill the martita and the martita refuel the cleo then the cleo refuel the martita. If something refashion the keely and it refashion the julee then the julee refuel the martita. The keely does not see the cleo.", "logic": "\nRefuel(julee, keely)\nRefashion(cleo, keely)\nParvenue(keely)\nPerceived(martita)\nforall x (Refuel(x, julee) and Refill(x, martita) -> Refill(martita, keely))\nforall x (Parvenue(x) -> Refuel(x, cleo))\nforall x (Refuel(x, cleo) -> Refashion(cleo, julee))\nRefashion(cleo, keely) -> Undaunted(cleo)\nforall x (Refill(x, martita) and Refuel(martita, cleo) -> Refuel(cleo, martita))\nforall x (Refashion(x, keely) and Refashion(x, julee) -> Refuel(julee, martita))\n\nnot Refuel(keely, cleo)\n\nParvenue(keely) and forall x (Parvenue(x) -> Refuel(x, cleo)) -> therefore Refuel(keely, cleo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The jeannine outbrave the ulrike. The eleonore overhang the ulrike. The ulrike is ergonomic. The tye is subfusc. If something outbrave the jeannine and it emasculate the tye then the tye emasculate the ulrike. If something is ergonomic then it outbrave the eleonore. If something outbrave the eleonore then the eleonore overhang the jeannine. If the eleonore overhang the ulrike then the eleonore is cespitose. If something emasculate the tye and the tye outbrave the eleonore then the eleonore outbrave the tye. If something overhang the ulrike and it overhang the jeannine then the jeannine outbrave the tye. The eleonore overhang the jeannine.", "logic": "\nOutbrave(jeannine, ulrike)\nOverhang(eleonore, ulrike)\nErgonomic(ulrike)\nSubfusc(tye)\nforall x (Outbrave(x, jeannine) and Emasculate(x, tye) -> Emasculate(tye, ulrike))\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) -> Outbrave(x, eleonore))\nforall x (Outbrave(x, eleonore) -> Overhang(eleonore, jeannine))\nOverhang(eleonore, ulrike) -> Cespitose(eleonore)\nforall x (Emasculate(x, tye) and Outbrave(tye, eleonore) -> Outbrave(eleonore, tye))\nforall x (Overhang(x, ulrike) and Overhang(x, jeannine) -> Outbrave(jeannine, tye))\n\nOverhang(eleonore, jeannine)\n\nErgonomic(ulrike) and forall x (Ergonomic(x) -> Outbrave(x, eleonore)) -> therefore Outbrave(ulrike, eleonore) Outbrave(ulrike, eleonore) and forall x (Outbrave(x, eleonore) -> Overhang(eleonore, jeannine)) -> therefore Overhang(eleonore, jeannine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The keene scoot the schuyler. The jeanie clapboard the schuyler. The schuyler is skanky. The sheldon is prissy. If something scoot the keene and it moult the sheldon then the sheldon moult the schuyler. If something is skanky then it scoot the jeanie. If something scoot the jeanie then the jeanie clapboard the keene. If the jeanie clapboard the schuyler then the jeanie is fossorial. If something moult the sheldon and the sheldon scoot the jeanie then the jeanie scoot the sheldon. If something clapboard the schuyler and it clapboard the keene then the keene scoot the sheldon. The jeanie does not visit the keene.", "logic": "\nScoot(keene, schuyler)\nClapboard(jeanie, schuyler)\nSkanky(schuyler)\nPrissy(sheldon)\nforall x (Scoot(x, keene) and Moult(x, sheldon) -> Moult(sheldon, schuyler))\nforall x (Skanky(x) -> Scoot(x, jeanie))\nforall x (Scoot(x, jeanie) -> Clapboard(jeanie, keene))\nClapboard(jeanie, schuyler) -> Fossorial(jeanie)\nforall x (Moult(x, sheldon) and Scoot(sheldon, jeanie) -> Scoot(jeanie, sheldon))\nforall x (Clapboard(x, schuyler) and Clapboard(x, keene) -> Scoot(keene, sheldon))\n\nnot Clapboard(jeanie, keene)\n\nSkanky(schuyler) and forall x (Skanky(x) -> Scoot(x, jeanie)) -> therefore Scoot(schuyler, jeanie) Scoot(schuyler, jeanie) and forall x (Scoot(x, jeanie) -> Clapboard(jeanie, keene)) -> therefore Clapboard(jeanie, keene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The mina subtract the wilbert. The adaline blunt the wilbert. The wilbert is fistulate. The laurena is biface. If something subtract the mina and it repugn the laurena then the laurena repugn the wilbert. If something is fistulate then it subtract the adaline. If something subtract the adaline then the adaline blunt the mina. If the adaline blunt the wilbert then the adaline is forceful. If something repugn the laurena and the laurena subtract the adaline then the adaline subtract the laurena. If something blunt the wilbert and it blunt the mina then the mina subtract the laurena. The mina subtract the laurena.", "logic": "\nSubtract(mina, wilbert)\nBlunt(adaline, wilbert)\nFistulate(wilbert)\nBiface(laurena)\nforall x (Subtract(x, mina) and Repugn(x, laurena) -> Repugn(laurena, wilbert))\nforall x (Fistulate(x) -> Subtract(x, adaline))\nforall x (Subtract(x, adaline) -> Blunt(adaline, mina))\nBlunt(adaline, wilbert) -> Forceful(adaline)\nforall x (Repugn(x, laurena) and Subtract(laurena, adaline) -> Subtract(adaline, laurena))\nforall x (Blunt(x, wilbert) and Blunt(x, mina) -> Subtract(mina, laurena))\n\nSubtract(mina, laurena)\n\nFistulate(wilbert) and forall x (Fistulate(x) -> Subtract(x, adaline)) -> therefore Subtract(wilbert, adaline) Subtract(wilbert, adaline) and forall x (Subtract(x, adaline) -> Blunt(adaline, mina)) -> therefore Blunt(adaline, mina) Blunt(adaline, wilbert) and Blunt(adaline, mina) and forall x (Blunt(x, wilbert) and Blunt(x, mina) -> Subtract(mina, laurena)) -> therefore Subtract(mina, laurena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The nissie cage the blondell. The graham aver the blondell. The blondell is gushing. The brock is cyprinid. If something cage the nissie and it chandelle the brock then the brock chandelle the blondell. If something is gushing then it cage the graham. If something cage the graham then the graham aver the nissie. If the graham aver the blondell then the graham is petulant. If something chandelle the brock and the brock cage the graham then the graham cage the brock. If something aver the blondell and it aver the nissie then the nissie cage the brock. The nissie does not see the brock.", "logic": "\nCage(nissie, blondell)\nAver(graham, blondell)\nGushing(blondell)\nCyprinid(brock)\nforall x (Cage(x, nissie) and Chandelle(x, brock) -> Chandelle(brock, blondell))\nforall x (Gushing(x) -> Cage(x, graham))\nforall x (Cage(x, graham) -> Aver(graham, nissie))\nAver(graham, blondell) -> Petulant(graham)\nforall x (Chandelle(x, brock) and Cage(brock, graham) -> Cage(graham, brock))\nforall x (Aver(x, blondell) and Aver(x, nissie) -> Cage(nissie, brock))\n\nnot Cage(nissie, brock)\n\nGushing(blondell) and forall x (Gushing(x) -> Cage(x, graham)) -> therefore Cage(blondell, graham) Cage(blondell, graham) and forall x (Cage(x, graham) -> Aver(graham, nissie)) -> therefore Aver(graham, nissie) Aver(graham, blondell) and Aver(graham, nissie) and forall x (Aver(x, blondell) and Aver(x, nissie) -> Cage(nissie, brock)) -> therefore Cage(nissie, brock)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The andrey tattle the edsel. The joellyn audit the edsel. The edsel is dendritic. The elana is monocarpic. If something tattle the andrey and it avianize the elana then the elana avianize the edsel. If something is dendritic then it tattle the joellyn. If something tattle the joellyn then the joellyn audit the andrey. If the joellyn audit the edsel then the joellyn is forgotten. If something avianize the elana and the elana tattle the joellyn then the joellyn tattle the elana. If something audit the edsel and it audit the andrey then the andrey tattle the elana. The elana does not need the edsel.", "logic": "\nTattle(andrey, edsel)\nAudit(joellyn, edsel)\nDendritic(edsel)\nMonocarpic(elana)\nforall x (Tattle(x, andrey) and Avianize(x, elana) -> Avianize(elana, edsel))\nforall x (Dendritic(x) -> Tattle(x, joellyn))\nforall x (Tattle(x, joellyn) -> Audit(joellyn, andrey))\nAudit(joellyn, edsel) -> Forgotten(joellyn)\nforall x (Avianize(x, elana) and Tattle(elana, joellyn) -> Tattle(joellyn, elana))\nforall x (Audit(x, edsel) and Audit(x, andrey) -> Tattle(andrey, elana))\n\nnot Avianize(elana, edsel)\n\nforall x (Tattle(x, andrey) and Avianize(x, elana) -> Avianize(elana, edsel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The amabelle cuss the quinn. The miguelita coast the quinn. The quinn is beige. The dew is astonished. If something cuss the amabelle and it narrow the dew then the dew narrow the quinn. If something is beige then it cuss the miguelita. If something cuss the miguelita then the miguelita coast the amabelle. If the miguelita coast the quinn then the miguelita is crested. If something narrow the dew and the dew cuss the miguelita then the miguelita cuss the dew. If something coast the quinn and it coast the amabelle then the amabelle cuss the dew. The miguelita cuss the miguelita.", "logic": "\nCuss(amabelle, quinn)\nCoast(miguelita, quinn)\nBeige(quinn)\nAstonished(dew)\nforall x (Cuss(x, amabelle) and Narrow(x, dew) -> Narrow(dew, quinn))\nforall x (Beige(x) -> Cuss(x, miguelita))\nforall x (Cuss(x, miguelita) -> Coast(miguelita, amabelle))\nCoast(miguelita, quinn) -> Crested(miguelita)\nforall x (Narrow(x, dew) and Cuss(dew, miguelita) -> Cuss(miguelita, dew))\nforall x (Coast(x, quinn) and Coast(x, amabelle) -> Cuss(amabelle, dew))\n\nCuss(miguelita, miguelita)\n\nforall x (Beige(x) -> Cuss(x, miguelita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The leone jitterbug the aleck. The viki prizefight the aleck. The aleck is bonelike. The horatio is held. If something jitterbug the leone and it hibachi the horatio then the horatio hibachi the aleck. If something is bonelike then it jitterbug the viki. If something jitterbug the viki then the viki prizefight the leone. If the viki prizefight the aleck then the viki is extrusive. If something hibachi the horatio and the horatio jitterbug the viki then the viki jitterbug the horatio. If something prizefight the aleck and it prizefight the leone then the leone jitterbug the horatio. The horatio does not see the viki.", "logic": "\nJitterbug(leone, aleck)\nPrizefight(viki, aleck)\nBonelike(aleck)\nHeld(horatio)\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, leone) and Hibachi(x, horatio) -> Hibachi(horatio, aleck))\nforall x (Bonelike(x) -> Jitterbug(x, viki))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, viki) -> Prizefight(viki, leone))\nPrizefight(viki, aleck) -> Extrusive(viki)\nforall x (Hibachi(x, horatio) and Jitterbug(horatio, viki) -> Jitterbug(viki, horatio))\nforall x (Prizefight(x, aleck) and Prizefight(x, leone) -> Jitterbug(leone, horatio))\n\nnot Jitterbug(horatio, viki)\n\nforall x (Bonelike(x) -> Jitterbug(x, viki)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The reid fracture the marla. The kristyn digest the marla. The marla is pigheaded. The petra is creaky. If something fracture the reid and it disinter the petra then the petra disinter the marla. If something is pigheaded then it fracture the kristyn. If something fracture the kristyn then the kristyn digest the reid. If the kristyn digest the marla then the kristyn is improvable. If something disinter the petra and the petra fracture the kristyn then the kristyn fracture the petra. If something digest the marla and it digest the reid then the reid fracture the petra. The reid fracture the kristyn.", "logic": "\nFracture(reid, marla)\nDigest(kristyn, marla)\nPigheaded(marla)\nCreaky(petra)\nforall x (Fracture(x, reid) and Disinter(x, petra) -> Disinter(petra, marla))\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Fracture(x, kristyn))\nforall x (Fracture(x, kristyn) -> Digest(kristyn, reid))\nDigest(kristyn, marla) -> Improvable(kristyn)\nforall x (Disinter(x, petra) and Fracture(petra, kristyn) -> Fracture(kristyn, petra))\nforall x (Digest(x, marla) and Digest(x, reid) -> Fracture(reid, petra))\n\nFracture(reid, kristyn)\n\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) -> Fracture(x, kristyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The chery smite the florice. The reggis bunco the florice. The florice is ephemeral. The jenelle is innate. If something smite the chery and it focalise the jenelle then the jenelle focalise the florice. If something is ephemeral then it smite the reggis. If something smite the reggis then the reggis bunco the chery. If the reggis bunco the florice then the reggis is unmated. If something focalise the jenelle and the jenelle smite the reggis then the reggis smite the jenelle. If something bunco the florice and it bunco the chery then the chery smite the jenelle. The reggis is not ephemeral.", "logic": "\nSmite(chery, florice)\nBunco(reggis, florice)\nEphemeral(florice)\nInnate(jenelle)\nforall x (Smite(x, chery) and Focalise(x, jenelle) -> Focalise(jenelle, florice))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) -> Smite(x, reggis))\nforall x (Smite(x, reggis) -> Bunco(reggis, chery))\nBunco(reggis, florice) -> Unmated(reggis)\nforall x (Focalise(x, jenelle) and Smite(jenelle, reggis) -> Smite(reggis, jenelle))\nforall x (Bunco(x, florice) and Bunco(x, chery) -> Smite(chery, jenelle))\n\nnot Ephemeral(reggis)\n\nnot Ephemeral(reggis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The tabitha bean the anabelle. The odin skank the anabelle. The anabelle is locomotive. The douglass is comical. If something bean the tabitha and it sensualise the douglass then the douglass sensualise the anabelle. If something is locomotive then it bean the odin. If something bean the odin then the odin skank the tabitha. If the odin skank the anabelle then the odin is bodied. If something sensualise the douglass and the douglass bean the odin then the odin bean the douglass. If something skank the anabelle and it skank the tabitha then the tabitha bean the douglass. The tabitha skank the tabitha.", "logic": "\nBean(tabitha, anabelle)\nSkank(odin, anabelle)\nLocomotive(anabelle)\nComical(douglass)\nforall x (Bean(x, tabitha) and Sensualise(x, douglass) -> Sensualise(douglass, anabelle))\nforall x (Locomotive(x) -> Bean(x, odin))\nforall x (Bean(x, odin) -> Skank(odin, tabitha))\nSkank(odin, anabelle) -> Bodied(odin)\nforall x (Sensualise(x, douglass) and Bean(douglass, odin) -> Bean(odin, douglass))\nforall x (Skank(x, anabelle) and Skank(x, tabitha) -> Bean(tabitha, douglass))\n\nSkank(tabitha, tabitha)\n\nSkank(tabitha, tabitha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The allegra misbehave the devi. The derrol overhaul the devi. The devi is beaten. The greggory is pivotal. If something misbehave the allegra and it detox the greggory then the greggory detox the devi. If something is beaten then it misbehave the derrol. If something misbehave the derrol then the derrol overhaul the allegra. If the derrol overhaul the devi then the derrol is perturbed. If something detox the greggory and the greggory misbehave the derrol then the derrol misbehave the greggory. If something overhaul the devi and it overhaul the allegra then the allegra misbehave the greggory. The allegra is not big.", "logic": "\nMisbehave(allegra, devi)\nOverhaul(derrol, devi)\nBeaten(devi)\nPivotal(greggory)\nforall x (Misbehave(x, allegra) and Detox(x, greggory) -> Detox(greggory, devi))\nforall x (Beaten(x) -> Misbehave(x, derrol))\nforall x (Misbehave(x, derrol) -> Overhaul(derrol, allegra))\nOverhaul(derrol, devi) -> Perturbed(derrol)\nforall x (Detox(x, greggory) and Misbehave(greggory, derrol) -> Misbehave(derrol, greggory))\nforall x (Overhaul(x, devi) and Overhaul(x, allegra) -> Misbehave(allegra, greggory))\n\nnot Big(allegra)\n\nnot Big(allegra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The rosalia drink the laurena. The jason urinate the laurena. The laurena is serbian. The kata is umteen. If something drink the rosalia and it stanch the kata then the kata stanch the laurena. If something is serbian then it drink the jason. If something drink the jason then the jason urinate the rosalia. If the jason urinate the laurena then the jason is gaumless. If something stanch the kata and the kata drink the jason then the jason drink the kata. If something urinate the laurena and it urinate the rosalia then the rosalia drink the kata. The rosalia stanch the laurena.", "logic": "\nDrink(rosalia, laurena)\nUrinate(jason, laurena)\nSerbian(laurena)\nUmteen(kata)\nforall x (Drink(x, rosalia) and Stanch(x, kata) -> Stanch(kata, laurena))\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Drink(x, jason))\nforall x (Drink(x, jason) -> Urinate(jason, rosalia))\nUrinate(jason, laurena) -> Gaumless(jason)\nforall x (Stanch(x, kata) and Drink(kata, jason) -> Drink(jason, kata))\nforall x (Urinate(x, laurena) and Urinate(x, rosalia) -> Drink(rosalia, kata))\n\nStanch(rosalia, laurena)\n\nStanch(rosalia, laurena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-7"} {"premises": "The yancy supinate the barbee. The barbee supinate the jillane. The jillane supinate the yancy. The maryellen supinate the jillane. If the maryellen supinate the yancy and the maryellen cachinnate the jillane then the maryellen is alive. If someone cachinnate the jillane then the jillane is unfounded. If someone supinate the maryellen and the maryellen cachinnate the yancy then the maryellen quarry the yancy. If someone supinate the maryellen and they chase the maryellen then the maryellen is alive. If someone supinate the maryellen then they like the yancy. If the barbee is collegiate then the barbee cachinnate the jillane. If someone supinate the jillane and they like the barbee then they chase the yancy. If the jillane quarry the barbee and the barbee is unfounded then the jillane is stopped. The yancy supinate the barbee.", "logic": "\nSupinate(yancy, barbee)\nSupinate(barbee, jillane)\nSupinate(jillane, yancy)\nSupinate(maryellen, jillane)\nSupinate(maryellen, yancy) and Cachinnate(maryellen, jillane) -> Alive(maryellen)\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, jillane) -> Unfounded(jillane))\nforall x (Supinate(x, maryellen) and Cachinnate(maryellen, yancy) -> Quarry(maryellen, yancy))\nforall x (Supinate(x, maryellen) and Quarry(x, maryellen) -> Alive(maryellen))\nforall x (Supinate(x, maryellen) -> Cachinnate(x, yancy))\nCollegiate(barbee) -> Cachinnate(barbee, jillane)\nforall x (Supinate(x, jillane) and Cachinnate(x, barbee) -> Quarry(x, yancy))\nQuarry(jillane, barbee) and Unfounded(barbee) -> Stopped(jillane)\n\nSupinate(yancy, barbee)\n\ntherefore Supinate(yancy, barbee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2043"} {"premises": "The alexi generate the davie. The davie generate the jefry. The jefry generate the alexi. The tilda generate the jefry. If the tilda generate the alexi and the tilda resect the jefry then the tilda is mothy. If someone resect the jefry then the jefry is rancid. If someone generate the tilda and the tilda resect the alexi then the tilda clout the alexi. If someone generate the tilda and they chase the tilda then the tilda is mothy. If someone generate the tilda then they like the alexi. If the davie is eatable then the davie resect the jefry. If someone generate the jefry and they like the davie then they chase the alexi. If the jefry clout the davie and the davie is rancid then the jefry is uncheerful. The jefry does not visit the alexi.", "logic": "\nGenerate(alexi, davie)\nGenerate(davie, jefry)\nGenerate(jefry, alexi)\nGenerate(tilda, jefry)\nGenerate(tilda, alexi) and Resect(tilda, jefry) -> Mothy(tilda)\nforall x (Resect(x, jefry) -> Rancid(jefry))\nforall x (Generate(x, tilda) and Resect(tilda, alexi) -> Clout(tilda, alexi))\nforall x (Generate(x, tilda) and Clout(x, tilda) -> Mothy(tilda))\nforall x (Generate(x, tilda) -> Resect(x, alexi))\nEatable(davie) -> Resect(davie, jefry)\nforall x (Generate(x, jefry) and Resect(x, davie) -> Clout(x, alexi))\nClout(jefry, davie) and Rancid(davie) -> Uncheerful(jefry)\n\nnot Generate(jefry, alexi)\n\ntherefore Generate(jefry, alexi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2043"} {"premises": "The ame colligate the creighton. The creighton colligate the gusty. The gusty colligate the ame. The elie colligate the gusty. If the elie colligate the ame and the elie bruise the gusty then the elie is four. If someone bruise the gusty then the gusty is bulging. If someone colligate the elie and the elie bruise the ame then the elie sharpshoot the ame. If someone colligate the elie and they chase the elie then the elie is four. If someone colligate the elie then they like the ame. If the creighton is overhanded then the creighton bruise the gusty. If someone colligate the gusty and they like the creighton then they chase the ame. If the gusty sharpshoot the creighton and the creighton is bulging then the gusty is pierced. The gusty is not bulging.", "logic": "\nColligate(ame, creighton)\nColligate(creighton, gusty)\nColligate(gusty, ame)\nColligate(elie, gusty)\nColligate(elie, ame) and Bruise(elie, gusty) -> Four(elie)\nforall x (Bruise(x, gusty) -> Bulging(gusty))\nforall x (Colligate(x, elie) and Bruise(elie, ame) -> Sharpshoot(elie, ame))\nforall x (Colligate(x, elie) and Sharpshoot(x, elie) -> Four(elie))\nforall x (Colligate(x, elie) -> Bruise(x, ame))\nOverhanded(creighton) -> Bruise(creighton, gusty)\nforall x (Colligate(x, gusty) and Bruise(x, creighton) -> Sharpshoot(x, ame))\nSharpshoot(gusty, creighton) and Bulging(creighton) -> Pierced(gusty)\n\nnot Bulging(gusty)\n\nforall x (Bruise(x, gusty) -> Bulging(gusty)) <- Overhanded(creighton) -> Bruise(creighton, gusty) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2043"} {"premises": "The jeffie unbelt the tish. The tish unbelt the karrie. The karrie unbelt the jeffie. The audrie unbelt the karrie. If the audrie unbelt the jeffie and the audrie wallow the karrie then the audrie is bivariate. If someone wallow the karrie then the karrie is choosy. If someone unbelt the audrie and the audrie wallow the jeffie then the audrie misadvise the jeffie. If someone unbelt the audrie and they chase the audrie then the audrie is bivariate. If someone unbelt the audrie then they like the jeffie. If the tish is chimeric then the tish wallow the karrie. If someone unbelt the karrie and they like the tish then they chase the jeffie. If the karrie misadvise the tish and the tish is choosy then the karrie is algometric. The karrie is chimeric.", "logic": "\nUnbelt(jeffie, tish)\nUnbelt(tish, karrie)\nUnbelt(karrie, jeffie)\nUnbelt(audrie, karrie)\nUnbelt(audrie, jeffie) and Wallow(audrie, karrie) -> Bivariate(audrie)\nforall x (Wallow(x, karrie) -> Choosy(karrie))\nforall x (Unbelt(x, audrie) and Wallow(audrie, jeffie) -> Misadvise(audrie, jeffie))\nforall x (Unbelt(x, audrie) and Misadvise(x, audrie) -> Bivariate(audrie))\nforall x (Unbelt(x, audrie) -> Wallow(x, jeffie))\nChimeric(tish) -> Wallow(tish, karrie)\nforall x (Unbelt(x, karrie) and Wallow(x, tish) -> Misadvise(x, jeffie))\nMisadvise(karrie, tish) and Choosy(tish) -> Algometric(karrie)\n\nChimeric(karrie)\n\nChimeric(karrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2043"} {"premises": "Iris is tasmanian. Iris is foul. Iris is uneducated. Donni is foul. Donni is uneducated. Donni is skinnerian. Donni is cuspidal. Dotti is cuspidal. Ilsa is skinnerian. Ilsa is mauritian. If Dotti is foul and Dotti is cuspidal then Dotti is uneducated. Blue, skinnerian things are tasmanian. If something is mauritian then it is cuspidal. White things are mauritian. All skinnerian, tasmanian things are cuspidal. Smart, foul things are skinnerian. White, tasmanian things are mauritian. All mauritian, uneducated things are hindermost. Donni is uneducated.", "logic": "\nTasmanian(iris)\nFoul(iris)\nUneducated(iris)\nFoul(donni)\nUneducated(donni)\nSkinnerian(donni)\nCuspidal(donni)\nCuspidal(dotti)\nSkinnerian(ilsa)\nMauritian(ilsa)\nFoul(dotti) and Cuspidal(dotti) -> Uneducated(dotti)\nforall x (Hindermost(x) and Skinnerian(x) -> Tasmanian(x))\nforall x (Mauritian(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) -> Mauritian(x))\nforall x (Skinnerian(x) and Tasmanian(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Mauritian(x) and Foul(x) -> Skinnerian(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Tasmanian(x) -> Mauritian(x))\nforall x (Mauritian(x) and Uneducated(x) -> Hindermost(x))\n\nUneducated(donni)\n\ntherefore Uneducated(donni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Hart is amenable. Hart is eugenic. Hart is chiasmatic. Worden is eugenic. Worden is chiasmatic. Worden is sickish. Worden is trig. Virginie is trig. Skipton is sickish. Skipton is bustling. If Virginie is eugenic and Virginie is trig then Virginie is chiasmatic. Blue, sickish things are amenable. If something is bustling then it is trig. White things are bustling. All sickish, amenable things are trig. Smart, eugenic things are sickish. White, amenable things are bustling. All bustling, chiasmatic things are anguished. Worden is not sickish.", "logic": "\nAmenable(hart)\nEugenic(hart)\nChiasmatic(hart)\nEugenic(worden)\nChiasmatic(worden)\nSickish(worden)\nTrig(worden)\nTrig(virginie)\nSickish(skipton)\nBustling(skipton)\nEugenic(virginie) and Trig(virginie) -> Chiasmatic(virginie)\nforall x (Anguished(x) and Sickish(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Bustling(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Trig(x) -> Bustling(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) and Amenable(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Bustling(x) and Eugenic(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Trig(x) and Amenable(x) -> Bustling(x))\nforall x (Bustling(x) and Chiasmatic(x) -> Anguished(x))\n\nnot Sickish(worden)\n\ntherefore Sickish(worden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Ardelle is chic. Ardelle is incoming. Ardelle is annoyed. Joey is incoming. Joey is annoyed. Joey is warning. Joey is pneumatic. Clarisse is pneumatic. Ardine is warning. Ardine is milky. If Clarisse is incoming and Clarisse is pneumatic then Clarisse is annoyed. Blue, warning things are chic. If something is milky then it is pneumatic. White things are milky. All warning, chic things are pneumatic. Smart, incoming things are warning. White, chic things are milky. All milky, annoyed things are unfriendly. Clarisse is milky.", "logic": "\nChic(ardelle)\nIncoming(ardelle)\nAnnoyed(ardelle)\nIncoming(joey)\nAnnoyed(joey)\nWarning(joey)\nPneumatic(joey)\nPneumatic(clarisse)\nWarning(ardine)\nMilky(ardine)\nIncoming(clarisse) and Pneumatic(clarisse) -> Annoyed(clarisse)\nforall x (Unfriendly(x) and Warning(x) -> Chic(x))\nforall x (Milky(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) -> Milky(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and Chic(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Milky(x) and Incoming(x) -> Warning(x))\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) and Chic(x) -> Milky(x))\nforall x (Milky(x) and Annoyed(x) -> Unfriendly(x))\n\nMilky(clarisse)\n\nPneumatic(clarisse) and forall x (Pneumatic(x) -> Milky(x)) -> therefore Milky(clarisse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Merrile is biramous. Merrile is stomachic. Merrile is repeated. Rodolph is stomachic. Rodolph is repeated. Rodolph is reprobate. Rodolph is vanished. Yance is vanished. Nunzio is reprobate. Nunzio is zoic. If Yance is stomachic and Yance is vanished then Yance is repeated. Blue, reprobate things are biramous. If something is zoic then it is vanished. White things are zoic. All reprobate, biramous things are vanished. Smart, stomachic things are reprobate. White, biramous things are zoic. All zoic, repeated things are purposive. Rodolph is not zoic.", "logic": "\nBiramous(merrile)\nStomachic(merrile)\nRepeated(merrile)\nStomachic(rodolph)\nRepeated(rodolph)\nReprobate(rodolph)\nVanished(rodolph)\nVanished(yance)\nReprobate(nunzio)\nZoic(nunzio)\nStomachic(yance) and Vanished(yance) -> Repeated(yance)\nforall x (Purposive(x) and Reprobate(x) -> Biramous(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Vanished(x))\nforall x (Vanished(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Reprobate(x) and Biramous(x) -> Vanished(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) and Stomachic(x) -> Reprobate(x))\nforall x (Vanished(x) and Biramous(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) and Repeated(x) -> Purposive(x))\n\nnot Zoic(rodolph)\n\nVanished(rodolph) and forall x (Vanished(x) -> Zoic(x)) -> therefore Zoic(rodolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Debi is astronomic. Debi is titulary. Debi is opulent. Kelsy is titulary. Kelsy is opulent. Kelsy is insomniac. Kelsy is most. Johannes is most. Lenora is insomniac. Lenora is nuptial. If Johannes is titulary and Johannes is most then Johannes is opulent. Blue, insomniac things are astronomic. If something is nuptial then it is most. White things are nuptial. All insomniac, astronomic things are most. Smart, titulary things are insomniac. White, astronomic things are nuptial. All nuptial, opulent things are alkalic. Kelsy is alkalic.", "logic": "\nAstronomic(debi)\nTitulary(debi)\nOpulent(debi)\nTitulary(kelsy)\nOpulent(kelsy)\nInsomniac(kelsy)\nMost(kelsy)\nMost(johannes)\nInsomniac(lenora)\nNuptial(lenora)\nTitulary(johannes) and Most(johannes) -> Opulent(johannes)\nforall x (Alkalic(x) and Insomniac(x) -> Astronomic(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Most(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Insomniac(x) and Astronomic(x) -> Most(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) and Titulary(x) -> Insomniac(x))\nforall x (Most(x) and Astronomic(x) -> Nuptial(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) and Opulent(x) -> Alkalic(x))\n\nAlkalic(kelsy)\n\nMost(kelsy) and forall x (Most(x) -> Nuptial(x)) -> therefore Nuptial(kelsy) Nuptial(kelsy) and Opulent(kelsy) and forall x (Nuptial(x) and Opulent(x) -> Alkalic(x)) -> therefore Alkalic(kelsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Hal is navicular. Hal is credulous. Hal is croatian. Moshe is credulous. Moshe is croatian. Moshe is pinioned. Moshe is antepartum. Mic is antepartum. Isidore is pinioned. Isidore is minimal. If Mic is credulous and Mic is antepartum then Mic is croatian. Blue, pinioned things are navicular. If something is minimal then it is antepartum. White things are minimal. All pinioned, navicular things are antepartum. Smart, credulous things are pinioned. White, navicular things are minimal. All minimal, croatian things are unpriestly. Moshe is not unpriestly.", "logic": "\nNavicular(hal)\nCredulous(hal)\nCroatian(hal)\nCredulous(moshe)\nCroatian(moshe)\nPinioned(moshe)\nAntepartum(moshe)\nAntepartum(mic)\nPinioned(isidore)\nMinimal(isidore)\nCredulous(mic) and Antepartum(mic) -> Croatian(mic)\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and Pinioned(x) -> Navicular(x))\nforall x (Minimal(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Antepartum(x) -> Minimal(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) and Navicular(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Minimal(x) and Credulous(x) -> Pinioned(x))\nforall x (Antepartum(x) and Navicular(x) -> Minimal(x))\nforall x (Minimal(x) and Croatian(x) -> Unpriestly(x))\n\nnot Unpriestly(moshe)\n\nAntepartum(moshe) and forall x (Antepartum(x) -> Minimal(x)) -> therefore Minimal(moshe) Minimal(moshe) and Croatian(moshe) and forall x (Minimal(x) and Croatian(x) -> Unpriestly(x)) -> therefore Unpriestly(moshe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Petrina is bizonal. Petrina is cropped. Petrina is monogamous. Dylan is cropped. Dylan is monogamous. Dylan is brachial. Dylan is charitable. Ibby is charitable. Lauraine is brachial. Lauraine is sizeable. If Ibby is cropped and Ibby is charitable then Ibby is monogamous. Blue, brachial things are bizonal. If something is sizeable then it is charitable. White things are sizeable. All brachial, bizonal things are charitable. Smart, cropped things are brachial. White, bizonal things are sizeable. All sizeable, monogamous things are knotty. Dylan is bizonal.", "logic": "\nBizonal(petrina)\nCropped(petrina)\nMonogamous(petrina)\nCropped(dylan)\nMonogamous(dylan)\nBrachial(dylan)\nCharitable(dylan)\nCharitable(ibby)\nBrachial(lauraine)\nSizeable(lauraine)\nCropped(ibby) and Charitable(ibby) -> Monogamous(ibby)\nforall x (Knotty(x) and Brachial(x) -> Bizonal(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) -> Charitable(x))\nforall x (Charitable(x) -> Sizeable(x))\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Bizonal(x) -> Charitable(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) and Cropped(x) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Charitable(x) and Bizonal(x) -> Sizeable(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Knotty(x))\n\nBizonal(dylan)\n\nCharitable(dylan) and forall x (Charitable(x) -> Sizeable(x)) -> therefore Sizeable(dylan) Sizeable(dylan) and Monogamous(dylan) and forall x (Sizeable(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Knotty(x)) -> therefore Knotty(dylan) Knotty(dylan) and Brachial(dylan) and forall x (Knotty(x) and Brachial(x) -> Bizonal(x)) -> therefore Bizonal(dylan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Cati is ferrous. Cati is shadowed. Cati is arithmetic. Tamra is shadowed. Tamra is arithmetic. Tamra is housebound. Tamra is antlered. Kellyann is antlered. Stu is housebound. Stu is upright. If Kellyann is shadowed and Kellyann is antlered then Kellyann is arithmetic. Blue, housebound things are ferrous. If something is upright then it is antlered. White things are upright. All housebound, ferrous things are antlered. Smart, shadowed things are housebound. White, ferrous things are upright. All upright, arithmetic things are leaded. Tamra is not ferrous.", "logic": "\nFerrous(cati)\nShadowed(cati)\nArithmetic(cati)\nShadowed(tamra)\nArithmetic(tamra)\nHousebound(tamra)\nAntlered(tamra)\nAntlered(kellyann)\nHousebound(stu)\nUpright(stu)\nShadowed(kellyann) and Antlered(kellyann) -> Arithmetic(kellyann)\nforall x (Leaded(x) and Housebound(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) -> Antlered(x))\nforall x (Antlered(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Housebound(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Antlered(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) and Shadowed(x) -> Housebound(x))\nforall x (Antlered(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) and Arithmetic(x) -> Leaded(x))\n\nnot Ferrous(tamra)\n\nAntlered(tamra) and forall x (Antlered(x) -> Upright(x)) -> therefore Upright(tamra) Upright(tamra) and Arithmetic(tamra) and forall x (Upright(x) and Arithmetic(x) -> Leaded(x)) -> therefore Leaded(tamra) Leaded(tamra) and Housebound(tamra) and forall x (Leaded(x) and Housebound(x) -> Ferrous(x)) -> therefore Ferrous(tamra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Ivie is rubbishy. Ivie is unremarked. Ivie is ghostlike. Nettle is unremarked. Nettle is ghostlike. Nettle is dubitable. Nettle is agnate. Coleen is agnate. Lin is dubitable. Lin is infertile. If Coleen is unremarked and Coleen is agnate then Coleen is ghostlike. Blue, dubitable things are rubbishy. If something is infertile then it is agnate. White things are infertile. All dubitable, rubbishy things are agnate. Smart, unremarked things are dubitable. White, rubbishy things are infertile. All infertile, ghostlike things are bionomic. Coleen is not ghostlike.", "logic": "\nRubbishy(ivie)\nUnremarked(ivie)\nGhostlike(ivie)\nUnremarked(nettle)\nGhostlike(nettle)\nDubitable(nettle)\nAgnate(nettle)\nAgnate(coleen)\nDubitable(lin)\nInfertile(lin)\nUnremarked(coleen) and Agnate(coleen) -> Ghostlike(coleen)\nforall x (Bionomic(x) and Dubitable(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) -> Agnate(x))\nforall x (Agnate(x) -> Infertile(x))\nforall x (Dubitable(x) and Rubbishy(x) -> Agnate(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) and Unremarked(x) -> Dubitable(x))\nforall x (Agnate(x) and Rubbishy(x) -> Infertile(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) and Ghostlike(x) -> Bionomic(x))\n\nnot Ghostlike(coleen)\n\nUnremarked(coleen) and Agnate(coleen) -> Ghostlike(coleen) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Madelene is overgrown. Madelene is epideictic. Madelene is refractive. Tannie is epideictic. Tannie is refractive. Tannie is siliceous. Tannie is cyrillic. Martino is cyrillic. Myrtia is siliceous. Myrtia is incoherent. If Martino is epideictic and Martino is cyrillic then Martino is refractive. Blue, siliceous things are overgrown. If something is incoherent then it is cyrillic. White things are incoherent. All siliceous, overgrown things are cyrillic. Smart, epideictic things are siliceous. White, overgrown things are incoherent. All incoherent, refractive things are bouncy. Martino is siliceous.", "logic": "\nOvergrown(madelene)\nEpideictic(madelene)\nRefractive(madelene)\nEpideictic(tannie)\nRefractive(tannie)\nSiliceous(tannie)\nCyrillic(tannie)\nCyrillic(martino)\nSiliceous(myrtia)\nIncoherent(myrtia)\nEpideictic(martino) and Cyrillic(martino) -> Refractive(martino)\nforall x (Bouncy(x) and Siliceous(x) -> Overgrown(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) -> Cyrillic(x))\nforall x (Cyrillic(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Siliceous(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Cyrillic(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and Epideictic(x) -> Siliceous(x))\nforall x (Cyrillic(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and Refractive(x) -> Bouncy(x))\n\nSiliceous(martino)\n\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and Epideictic(x) -> Siliceous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Lissa is unenforced. Lissa is verbatim. Lissa is waxy. Layton is verbatim. Layton is waxy. Layton is scarlet. Layton is oligarchic. Hoyt is oligarchic. Marry is scarlet. Marry is mercerized. If Hoyt is verbatim and Hoyt is oligarchic then Hoyt is waxy. Blue, scarlet things are unenforced. If something is mercerized then it is oligarchic. White things are mercerized. All scarlet, unenforced things are oligarchic. Smart, verbatim things are scarlet. White, unenforced things are mercerized. All mercerized, waxy things are appalling. Lissa is not scarlet.", "logic": "\nUnenforced(lissa)\nVerbatim(lissa)\nWaxy(lissa)\nVerbatim(layton)\nWaxy(layton)\nScarlet(layton)\nOligarchic(layton)\nOligarchic(hoyt)\nScarlet(marry)\nMercerized(marry)\nVerbatim(hoyt) and Oligarchic(hoyt) -> Waxy(hoyt)\nforall x (Appalling(x) and Scarlet(x) -> Unenforced(x))\nforall x (Mercerized(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Mercerized(x))\nforall x (Scarlet(x) and Unenforced(x) -> Oligarchic(x))\nforall x (Mercerized(x) and Verbatim(x) -> Scarlet(x))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) and Unenforced(x) -> Mercerized(x))\nforall x (Mercerized(x) and Waxy(x) -> Appalling(x))\n\nnot Scarlet(lissa)\n\nforall x (Mercerized(x) and Verbatim(x) -> Scarlet(x)) <- forall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Mercerized(x)) <- forall x (Mercerized(x) -> Oligarchic(x)) <- forall x (Oligarchic(x) and Unenforced(x) -> Mercerized(x)) <- forall x (Scarlet(x) and Unenforced(x) -> Oligarchic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Clarinda is articulary. Clarinda is manned. Clarinda is evenhanded. Luanna is manned. Luanna is evenhanded. Luanna is abomasal. Luanna is frontmost. Jobina is frontmost. Traver is abomasal. Traver is chancy. If Jobina is manned and Jobina is frontmost then Jobina is evenhanded. Blue, abomasal things are articulary. If something is chancy then it is frontmost. White things are chancy. All abomasal, articulary things are frontmost. Smart, manned things are abomasal. White, articulary things are chancy. All chancy, evenhanded things are southward. Traver is articulary.", "logic": "\nArticulary(clarinda)\nManned(clarinda)\nEvenhanded(clarinda)\nManned(luanna)\nEvenhanded(luanna)\nAbomasal(luanna)\nFrontmost(luanna)\nFrontmost(jobina)\nAbomasal(traver)\nChancy(traver)\nManned(jobina) and Frontmost(jobina) -> Evenhanded(jobina)\nforall x (Southward(x) and Abomasal(x) -> Articulary(x))\nforall x (Chancy(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) -> Chancy(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Articulary(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Chancy(x) and Manned(x) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) and Articulary(x) -> Chancy(x))\nforall x (Chancy(x) and Evenhanded(x) -> Southward(x))\n\nArticulary(traver)\n\nforall x (Southward(x) and Abomasal(x) -> Articulary(x)) <- forall x (Chancy(x) and Evenhanded(x) -> Southward(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Beau is initial. Beau is starless. Beau is prohibited. Tiff is starless. Tiff is prohibited. Tiff is autoecious. Tiff is extensive. Maxi is extensive. Elvis is autoecious. Elvis is precooled. If Maxi is starless and Maxi is extensive then Maxi is prohibited. Blue, autoecious things are initial. If something is precooled then it is extensive. White things are precooled. All autoecious, initial things are extensive. Smart, starless things are autoecious. White, initial things are precooled. All precooled, prohibited things are umbellate. Elvis is not prohibited.", "logic": "\nInitial(beau)\nStarless(beau)\nProhibited(beau)\nStarless(tiff)\nProhibited(tiff)\nAutoecious(tiff)\nExtensive(tiff)\nExtensive(maxi)\nAutoecious(elvis)\nPrecooled(elvis)\nStarless(maxi) and Extensive(maxi) -> Prohibited(maxi)\nforall x (Umbellate(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Initial(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Precooled(x))\nforall x (Autoecious(x) and Initial(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) and Starless(x) -> Autoecious(x))\nforall x (Extensive(x) and Initial(x) -> Precooled(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) and Prohibited(x) -> Umbellate(x))\n\nnot Prohibited(elvis)\n\nnot Prohibited(elvis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Iggie is zeroth. Iggie is funny. Iggie is tidy. Koralle is funny. Koralle is tidy. Koralle is lifelong. Koralle is emerging. Edi is emerging. Cheslie is lifelong. Cheslie is electrical. If Edi is funny and Edi is emerging then Edi is tidy. Blue, lifelong things are zeroth. If something is electrical then it is emerging. White things are electrical. All lifelong, zeroth things are emerging. Smart, funny things are lifelong. White, zeroth things are electrical. All electrical, tidy things are spotty. Edi is funny.", "logic": "\nZeroth(iggie)\nFunny(iggie)\nTidy(iggie)\nFunny(koralle)\nTidy(koralle)\nLifelong(koralle)\nEmerging(koralle)\nEmerging(edi)\nLifelong(cheslie)\nElectrical(cheslie)\nFunny(edi) and Emerging(edi) -> Tidy(edi)\nforall x (Spotty(x) and Lifelong(x) -> Zeroth(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) -> Emerging(x))\nforall x (Emerging(x) -> Electrical(x))\nforall x (Lifelong(x) and Zeroth(x) -> Emerging(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) and Funny(x) -> Lifelong(x))\nforall x (Emerging(x) and Zeroth(x) -> Electrical(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) and Tidy(x) -> Spotty(x))\n\nFunny(edi)\n\nFunny(edi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1070"} {"premises": "Marge is omissible. Marge is brazen. Dyanna is omissible. Dyanna is adnexal. Dyanna is bottommost. Dyanna is enlivening. Kassia is omissible. Kassia is adnexal. Jandy is unkindly. Jandy is enlivening. Kind things are bottommost. Cold things are adnexal. All bottommost things are scrawny. Dyanna is bottommost.", "logic": "\nOmissible(marge)\nBrazen(marge)\nOmissible(dyanna)\nAdnexal(dyanna)\nBottommost(dyanna)\nEnlivening(dyanna)\nOmissible(kassia)\nAdnexal(kassia)\nUnkindly(jandy)\nEnlivening(jandy)\nforall x (Adnexal(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nforall x (Unkindly(x) -> Adnexal(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Scrawny(x))\n\nBottommost(dyanna)\n\ntherefore Bottommost(dyanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Nara is frankish. Nara is hefty. Leela is frankish. Leela is unable. Leela is cresson. Leela is septal. Hilary is frankish. Hilary is unable. Colette is swishy. Colette is septal. Kind things are cresson. Cold things are unable. All cresson things are aldermanly. Colette is not swishy.", "logic": "\nFrankish(nara)\nHefty(nara)\nFrankish(leela)\nUnable(leela)\nCresson(leela)\nSeptal(leela)\nFrankish(hilary)\nUnable(hilary)\nSwishy(colette)\nSeptal(colette)\nforall x (Unable(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Swishy(x) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Cresson(x) -> Aldermanly(x))\n\nnot Swishy(colette)\n\ntherefore Swishy(colette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Niels is petulant. Niels is aweary. Zebulen is petulant. Zebulen is unstable. Zebulen is transfixed. Zebulen is paying. Robert is petulant. Robert is unstable. Daphene is collegial. Daphene is paying. Kind things are transfixed. Cold things are unstable. All transfixed things are monastic. Robert is transfixed.", "logic": "\nPetulant(niels)\nAweary(niels)\nPetulant(zebulen)\nUnstable(zebulen)\nTransfixed(zebulen)\nPaying(zebulen)\nPetulant(robert)\nUnstable(robert)\nCollegial(daphene)\nPaying(daphene)\nforall x (Unstable(x) -> Transfixed(x))\nforall x (Collegial(x) -> Unstable(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> Monastic(x))\n\nTransfixed(robert)\n\nUnstable(robert) and forall x (Unstable(x) -> Transfixed(x)) -> therefore Transfixed(robert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Zabrina is unkindly. Zabrina is egoistical. Dasya is unkindly. Dasya is nonrigid. Dasya is accustomed. Dasya is answerable. Hernando is unkindly. Hernando is nonrigid. Mohamad is infamous. Mohamad is answerable. Kind things are accustomed. Cold things are nonrigid. All accustomed things are boon. Dasya is not boon.", "logic": "\nUnkindly(zabrina)\nEgoistical(zabrina)\nUnkindly(dasya)\nNonrigid(dasya)\nAccustomed(dasya)\nAnswerable(dasya)\nUnkindly(hernando)\nNonrigid(hernando)\nInfamous(mohamad)\nAnswerable(mohamad)\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Infamous(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Boon(x))\n\nnot Boon(dasya)\n\nAccustomed(dasya) and forall x (Accustomed(x) -> Boon(x)) -> therefore Boon(dasya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Min is headless. Min is struck. Horatio is headless. Horatio is lucifugous. Horatio is annoyed. Horatio is brasslike. Tiphani is headless. Tiphani is lucifugous. Tomasine is faltering. Tomasine is brasslike. Kind things are annoyed. Cold things are lucifugous. All annoyed things are legendary. Tomasine is annoyed.", "logic": "\nHeadless(min)\nStruck(min)\nHeadless(horatio)\nLucifugous(horatio)\nAnnoyed(horatio)\nBrasslike(horatio)\nHeadless(tiphani)\nLucifugous(tiphani)\nFaltering(tomasine)\nBrasslike(tomasine)\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Faltering(x) -> Lucifugous(x))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Legendary(x))\n\nAnnoyed(tomasine)\n\nFaltering(tomasine) and forall x (Faltering(x) -> Lucifugous(x)) -> therefore Lucifugous(tomasine) Lucifugous(tomasine) and forall x (Lucifugous(x) -> Annoyed(x)) -> therefore Annoyed(tomasine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Electra is mercerised. Electra is agonistic. Devonna is mercerised. Devonna is meek. Devonna is arborous. Devonna is exploited. Griffin is mercerised. Griffin is meek. Berty is capsulate. Berty is exploited. Kind things are arborous. Cold things are meek. All arborous things are nonlinear. Griffin is not nonlinear.", "logic": "\nMercerised(electra)\nAgonistic(electra)\nMercerised(devonna)\nMeek(devonna)\nArborous(devonna)\nExploited(devonna)\nMercerised(griffin)\nMeek(griffin)\nCapsulate(berty)\nExploited(berty)\nforall x (Meek(x) -> Arborous(x))\nforall x (Capsulate(x) -> Meek(x))\nforall x (Arborous(x) -> Nonlinear(x))\n\nnot Nonlinear(griffin)\n\nMeek(griffin) and forall x (Meek(x) -> Arborous(x)) -> therefore Arborous(griffin) Arborous(griffin) and forall x (Arborous(x) -> Nonlinear(x)) -> therefore Nonlinear(griffin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Sammy is andante. Sammy is fenestral. Brady is andante. Brady is maudlin. Brady is calumnious. Brady is leaflike. Binky is andante. Binky is maudlin. Francesco is diestrual. Francesco is leaflike. Kind things are calumnious. Cold things are maudlin. All calumnious things are auburn. Francesco is auburn.", "logic": "\nAndante(sammy)\nFenestral(sammy)\nAndante(brady)\nMaudlin(brady)\nCalumnious(brady)\nLeaflike(brady)\nAndante(binky)\nMaudlin(binky)\nDiestrual(francesco)\nLeaflike(francesco)\nforall x (Maudlin(x) -> Calumnious(x))\nforall x (Diestrual(x) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Calumnious(x) -> Auburn(x))\n\nAuburn(francesco)\n\nDiestrual(francesco) and forall x (Diestrual(x) -> Maudlin(x)) -> therefore Maudlin(francesco) Maudlin(francesco) and forall x (Maudlin(x) -> Calumnious(x)) -> therefore Calumnious(francesco) Calumnious(francesco) and forall x (Calumnious(x) -> Auburn(x)) -> therefore Auburn(francesco)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Jazmin is unanswered. Jazmin is nutrient. Sharl is unanswered. Sharl is breathless. Sharl is resistant. Sharl is slothful. Chantalle is unanswered. Chantalle is breathless. Florice is mesial. Florice is slothful. Kind things are resistant. Cold things are breathless. All resistant things are flaxen. Florice is not flaxen.", "logic": "\nUnanswered(jazmin)\nNutrient(jazmin)\nUnanswered(sharl)\nBreathless(sharl)\nResistant(sharl)\nSlothful(sharl)\nUnanswered(chantalle)\nBreathless(chantalle)\nMesial(florice)\nSlothful(florice)\nforall x (Breathless(x) -> Resistant(x))\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> Breathless(x))\nforall x (Resistant(x) -> Flaxen(x))\n\nnot Flaxen(florice)\n\nMesial(florice) and forall x (Mesial(x) -> Breathless(x)) -> therefore Breathless(florice) Breathless(florice) and forall x (Breathless(x) -> Resistant(x)) -> therefore Resistant(florice) Resistant(florice) and forall x (Resistant(x) -> Flaxen(x)) -> therefore Flaxen(florice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Stuart is tapped. Stuart is dactylic. Annissa is tapped. Annissa is unsloped. Annissa is puerile. Annissa is ahorse. Giorgio is tapped. Giorgio is unsloped. Theressa is ungusseted. Theressa is ahorse. Kind things are puerile. Cold things are unsloped. All puerile things are nitrous. Stuart is not unsloped.", "logic": "\nTapped(stuart)\nDactylic(stuart)\nTapped(annissa)\nUnsloped(annissa)\nPuerile(annissa)\nAhorse(annissa)\nTapped(giorgio)\nUnsloped(giorgio)\nUngusseted(theressa)\nAhorse(theressa)\nforall x (Unsloped(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) -> Unsloped(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) -> Nitrous(x))\n\nnot Unsloped(stuart)\n\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) -> Unsloped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Rodrique is omissive. Rodrique is quaternate. Solly is omissive. Solly is convenient. Solly is faulty. Solly is runcinate. Maggy is omissive. Maggy is convenient. Lazare is singsong. Lazare is runcinate. Kind things are faulty. Cold things are convenient. All faulty things are despiteful. Rodrique is despiteful.", "logic": "\nOmissive(rodrique)\nQuaternate(rodrique)\nOmissive(solly)\nConvenient(solly)\nFaulty(solly)\nRuncinate(solly)\nOmissive(maggy)\nConvenient(maggy)\nSingsong(lazare)\nRuncinate(lazare)\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Faulty(x))\nforall x (Singsong(x) -> Convenient(x))\nforall x (Faulty(x) -> Despiteful(x))\n\nDespiteful(rodrique)\n\nforall x (Faulty(x) -> Despiteful(x)) <- forall x (Convenient(x) -> Faulty(x)) <- forall x (Singsong(x) -> Convenient(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Elnore is humourous. Elnore is homoerotic. Philippe is humourous. Philippe is untrodden. Philippe is anaclitic. Philippe is clitoric. Madelina is humourous. Madelina is untrodden. Pru is separative. Pru is clitoric. Kind things are anaclitic. Cold things are untrodden. All anaclitic things are cylindric. Elnore is not anaclitic.", "logic": "\nHumourous(elnore)\nHomoerotic(elnore)\nHumourous(philippe)\nUntrodden(philippe)\nAnaclitic(philippe)\nClitoric(philippe)\nHumourous(madelina)\nUntrodden(madelina)\nSeparative(pru)\nClitoric(pru)\nforall x (Untrodden(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Separative(x) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) -> Cylindric(x))\n\nnot Anaclitic(elnore)\n\nforall x (Untrodden(x) -> Anaclitic(x)) <- forall x (Separative(x) -> Untrodden(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Marcos is forcipate. Marcos is goaded. Raleigh is forcipate. Raleigh is eternal. Raleigh is magical. Raleigh is preteen. Wallas is forcipate. Wallas is eternal. Ignazio is modal. Ignazio is preteen. Kind things are magical. Cold things are eternal. All magical things are upstream. Raleigh is goaded.", "logic": "\nForcipate(marcos)\nGoaded(marcos)\nForcipate(raleigh)\nEternal(raleigh)\nMagical(raleigh)\nPreteen(raleigh)\nForcipate(wallas)\nEternal(wallas)\nModal(ignazio)\nPreteen(ignazio)\nforall x (Eternal(x) -> Magical(x))\nforall x (Modal(x) -> Eternal(x))\nforall x (Magical(x) -> Upstream(x))\n\nGoaded(raleigh)\n\nGoaded(raleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Teodoro is lifelong. Teodoro is bonkers. Hilbert is lifelong. Hilbert is atrocious. Hilbert is dispersive. Hilbert is brushy. Guido is lifelong. Guido is atrocious. Joly is primordial. Joly is brushy. Kind things are dispersive. Cold things are atrocious. All dispersive things are expositive. Joly is not lifelong.", "logic": "\nLifelong(teodoro)\nBonkers(teodoro)\nLifelong(hilbert)\nAtrocious(hilbert)\nDispersive(hilbert)\nBrushy(hilbert)\nLifelong(guido)\nAtrocious(guido)\nPrimordial(joly)\nBrushy(joly)\nforall x (Atrocious(x) -> Dispersive(x))\nforall x (Primordial(x) -> Atrocious(x))\nforall x (Dispersive(x) -> Expositive(x))\n\nnot Lifelong(joly)\n\nnot Lifelong(joly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Crista is relational. Crista is nourished. Bab is relational. Bab is numerable. Bab is reflexed. Bab is leaflike. Renae is relational. Renae is numerable. Elicia is animal. Elicia is leaflike. Kind things are reflexed. Cold things are numerable. All reflexed things are camphoric. Bab is animal.", "logic": "\nRelational(crista)\nNourished(crista)\nRelational(bab)\nNumerable(bab)\nReflexed(bab)\nLeaflike(bab)\nRelational(renae)\nNumerable(renae)\nAnimal(elicia)\nLeaflike(elicia)\nforall x (Numerable(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nforall x (Animal(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Reflexed(x) -> Camphoric(x))\n\nAnimal(bab)\n\nAnimal(bab) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Stella is blubbery. Stella is asyndetic. Jenni is blubbery. Jenni is thorough. Jenni is laggard. Jenni is fugitive. Heinz is blubbery. Heinz is thorough. Sheree is each. Sheree is fugitive. Kind things are laggard. Cold things are thorough. All laggard things are squeaking. Stella is not each.", "logic": "\nBlubbery(stella)\nAsyndetic(stella)\nBlubbery(jenni)\nThorough(jenni)\nLaggard(jenni)\nFugitive(jenni)\nBlubbery(heinz)\nThorough(heinz)\nEach(sheree)\nFugitive(sheree)\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Laggard(x))\nforall x (Each(x) -> Thorough(x))\nforall x (Laggard(x) -> Squeaking(x))\n\nnot Each(stella)\n\nnot Each(stella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "Pia is albanian. Pia is rawboned. Anselm is albanian. Anselm is chronic. Anselm is ictal. Anselm is nebulose. Frayda is albanian. Frayda is chronic. Rhetta is moresque. Rhetta is nebulose. Kind things are ictal. Cold things are chronic. All ictal things are obtuse. Frayda is nebulose.", "logic": "\nAlbanian(pia)\nRawboned(pia)\nAlbanian(anselm)\nChronic(anselm)\nIctal(anselm)\nNebulose(anselm)\nAlbanian(frayda)\nChronic(frayda)\nMoresque(rhetta)\nNebulose(rhetta)\nforall x (Chronic(x) -> Ictal(x))\nforall x (Moresque(x) -> Chronic(x))\nforall x (Ictal(x) -> Obtuse(x))\n\nNebulose(frayda)\n\nNebulose(frayda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The rudolph is beamy. If the rudolph is beamy and the rudolph is homing then the rudolph is iraki. All beamy things are homing. If the rudolph is celiac then the rudolph is outlined. If something is outlined and not iraki then it is celiac. Blue things are outlined. All iraki, beamy things are not outlined. The rudolph is beamy.", "logic": "\nBeamy(rudolph)\nBeamy(rudolph) and Homing(rudolph) -> Iraki(rudolph)\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Homing(x))\nCeliac(rudolph) -> Outlined(rudolph)\nforall x (Outlined(x) and not Iraki(x) -> Celiac(x))\nforall x (Celiac(x) -> Outlined(x))\nforall x (Iraki(x) and Beamy(x) -> not Outlined(x))\n\nBeamy(rudolph)\n\ntherefore Beamy(rudolph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The lorena is guardant. If the lorena is guardant and the lorena is dank then the lorena is unintended. All guardant things are dank. If the lorena is pierced then the lorena is threadlike. If something is threadlike and not unintended then it is pierced. Blue things are threadlike. All unintended, guardant things are not threadlike. The lorena is not guardant.", "logic": "\nGuardant(lorena)\nGuardant(lorena) and Dank(lorena) -> Unintended(lorena)\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Dank(x))\nPierced(lorena) -> Threadlike(lorena)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and not Unintended(x) -> Pierced(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Threadlike(x))\nforall x (Unintended(x) and Guardant(x) -> not Threadlike(x))\n\nnot Guardant(lorena)\n\ntherefore Guardant(lorena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The ilene is snaky. If the ilene is snaky and the ilene is patented then the ilene is anapestic. All snaky things are patented. If the ilene is ossiferous then the ilene is eutherian. If something is eutherian and not anapestic then it is ossiferous. Blue things are eutherian. All anapestic, snaky things are not eutherian. The ilene is patented.", "logic": "\nSnaky(ilene)\nSnaky(ilene) and Patented(ilene) -> Anapestic(ilene)\nforall x (Snaky(x) -> Patented(x))\nOssiferous(ilene) -> Eutherian(ilene)\nforall x (Eutherian(x) and not Anapestic(x) -> Ossiferous(x))\nforall x (Ossiferous(x) -> Eutherian(x))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) and Snaky(x) -> not Eutherian(x))\n\nPatented(ilene)\n\nSnaky(ilene) and forall x (Snaky(x) -> Patented(x)) -> therefore Patented(ilene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The jenni is duplex. If the jenni is duplex and the jenni is aligned then the jenni is cosmogenic. All duplex things are aligned. If the jenni is aware then the jenni is mercurous. If something is mercurous and not cosmogenic then it is aware. Blue things are mercurous. All cosmogenic, duplex things are not mercurous. The jenni is not aligned.", "logic": "\nDuplex(jenni)\nDuplex(jenni) and Aligned(jenni) -> Cosmogenic(jenni)\nforall x (Duplex(x) -> Aligned(x))\nAware(jenni) -> Mercurous(jenni)\nforall x (Mercurous(x) and not Cosmogenic(x) -> Aware(x))\nforall x (Aware(x) -> Mercurous(x))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) and Duplex(x) -> not Mercurous(x))\n\nnot Aligned(jenni)\n\nDuplex(jenni) and forall x (Duplex(x) -> Aligned(x)) -> therefore Aligned(jenni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The lynnelle is aerated. If the lynnelle is aerated and the lynnelle is overheated then the lynnelle is denotative. All aerated things are overheated. If the lynnelle is higher then the lynnelle is changeless. If something is changeless and not denotative then it is higher. Blue things are changeless. All denotative, aerated things are not changeless. The lynnelle is denotative.", "logic": "\nAerated(lynnelle)\nAerated(lynnelle) and Overheated(lynnelle) -> Denotative(lynnelle)\nforall x (Aerated(x) -> Overheated(x))\nHigher(lynnelle) -> Changeless(lynnelle)\nforall x (Changeless(x) and not Denotative(x) -> Higher(x))\nforall x (Higher(x) -> Changeless(x))\nforall x (Denotative(x) and Aerated(x) -> not Changeless(x))\n\nDenotative(lynnelle)\n\nAerated(lynnelle) and forall x (Aerated(x) -> Overheated(x)) -> therefore Overheated(lynnelle) Aerated(lynnelle) and Overheated(lynnelle) and Aerated(lynnelle) and Overheated(lynnelle) -> Denotative(lynnelle) -> therefore Denotative(lynnelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The broddie is musical. If the broddie is musical and the broddie is acoustic then the broddie is illative. All musical things are acoustic. If the broddie is honied then the broddie is adaptive. If something is adaptive and not illative then it is honied. Blue things are adaptive. All illative, musical things are not adaptive. The broddie is not illative.", "logic": "\nMusical(broddie)\nMusical(broddie) and Acoustic(broddie) -> Illative(broddie)\nforall x (Musical(x) -> Acoustic(x))\nHonied(broddie) -> Adaptive(broddie)\nforall x (Adaptive(x) and not Illative(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Honied(x) -> Adaptive(x))\nforall x (Illative(x) and Musical(x) -> not Adaptive(x))\n\nnot Illative(broddie)\n\nMusical(broddie) and forall x (Musical(x) -> Acoustic(x)) -> therefore Acoustic(broddie) Musical(broddie) and Acoustic(broddie) and Musical(broddie) and Acoustic(broddie) -> Illative(broddie) -> therefore Illative(broddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The laurella is puff. If the laurella is puff and the laurella is paved then the laurella is lambent. All puff things are paved. If the laurella is attired then the laurella is chylific. If something is chylific and not lambent then it is attired. Blue things are chylific. All lambent, puff things are not chylific. The laurella is not chylific.", "logic": "\nPuff(laurella)\nPuff(laurella) and Paved(laurella) -> Lambent(laurella)\nforall x (Puff(x) -> Paved(x))\nAttired(laurella) -> Chylific(laurella)\nforall x (Chylific(x) and not Lambent(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Attired(x) -> Chylific(x))\nforall x (Lambent(x) and Puff(x) -> not Chylific(x))\n\nnot Chylific(laurella)\n\nPuff(laurella) and forall x (Puff(x) -> Paved(x)) -> therefore Paved(laurella) Puff(laurella) and Paved(laurella) and Puff(laurella) and Paved(laurella) -> Lambent(laurella) -> therefore Lambent(laurella) Lambent(laurella) and Puff(laurella) and forall x (Lambent(x) and Puff(x) -> not Chylific(x)) -> therefore not Chylific(laurella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The nunzio is crookback. If the nunzio is crookback and the nunzio is haitian then the nunzio is fussy. All crookback things are haitian. If the nunzio is unbridled then the nunzio is squiggly. If something is squiggly and not fussy then it is unbridled. Blue things are squiggly. All fussy, crookback things are not squiggly. The nunzio is squiggly.", "logic": "\nCrookback(nunzio)\nCrookback(nunzio) and Haitian(nunzio) -> Fussy(nunzio)\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Haitian(x))\nUnbridled(nunzio) -> Squiggly(nunzio)\nforall x (Squiggly(x) and not Fussy(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Squiggly(x))\nforall x (Fussy(x) and Crookback(x) -> not Squiggly(x))\n\nSquiggly(nunzio)\n\nCrookback(nunzio) and forall x (Crookback(x) -> Haitian(x)) -> therefore Haitian(nunzio) Crookback(nunzio) and Haitian(nunzio) and Crookback(nunzio) and Haitian(nunzio) -> Fussy(nunzio) -> therefore Fussy(nunzio) Fussy(nunzio) and Crookback(nunzio) and forall x (Fussy(x) and Crookback(x) -> not Squiggly(x)) -> therefore not Squiggly(nunzio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The margarita is incestuous. If the margarita is incestuous and the margarita is anglican then the margarita is coated. All incestuous things are anglican. If the margarita is undrawn then the margarita is thick. If something is thick and not coated then it is undrawn. Blue things are thick. All coated, incestuous things are not thick. The margarita is not undrawn.", "logic": "\nIncestuous(margarita)\nIncestuous(margarita) and Anglican(margarita) -> Coated(margarita)\nforall x (Incestuous(x) -> Anglican(x))\nUndrawn(margarita) -> Thick(margarita)\nforall x (Thick(x) and not Coated(x) -> Undrawn(x))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) -> Thick(x))\nforall x (Coated(x) and Incestuous(x) -> not Thick(x))\n\nnot Undrawn(margarita)\n\nforall x (Thick(x) and not Coated(x) -> Undrawn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The jimmy is aligning. If the jimmy is aligning and the jimmy is dexter then the jimmy is rummy. All aligning things are dexter. If the jimmy is moonstruck then the jimmy is unsorted. If something is unsorted and not rummy then it is moonstruck. Blue things are unsorted. All rummy, aligning things are not unsorted. The jimmy chases the jimmy.", "logic": "\nAligning(jimmy)\nAligning(jimmy) and Dexter(jimmy) -> Rummy(jimmy)\nforall x (Aligning(x) -> Dexter(x))\nMoonstruck(jimmy) -> Unsorted(jimmy)\nforall x (Unsorted(x) and not Rummy(x) -> Moonstruck(x))\nforall x (Moonstruck(x) -> Unsorted(x))\nforall x (Rummy(x) and Aligning(x) -> not Unsorted(x))\n\nChases(jimmy, jimmy)\n\nChases(jimmy, jimmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The harley is foul. If the harley is foul and the harley is latest then the harley is canonical. All foul things are latest. If the harley is unuttered then the harley is nefarious. If something is nefarious and not canonical then it is unuttered. Blue things are nefarious. All canonical, foul things are not nefarious. The harley does not visit the harley.", "logic": "\nFoul(harley)\nFoul(harley) and Latest(harley) -> Canonical(harley)\nforall x (Foul(x) -> Latest(x))\nUnuttered(harley) -> Nefarious(harley)\nforall x (Nefarious(x) and not Canonical(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nforall x (Canonical(x) and Foul(x) -> not Nefarious(x))\n\nnot Visits(harley, harley)\n\nnot Visits(harley, harley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "The bamby is kindled. If the bamby is kindled and the bamby is shoed then the bamby is unstrung. All kindled things are shoed. If the bamby is flameproof then the bamby is intruding. If something is intruding and not unstrung then it is flameproof. Blue things are intruding. All unstrung, kindled things are not intruding. The bamby sees the bamby.", "logic": "\nKindled(bamby)\nKindled(bamby) and Shoed(bamby) -> Unstrung(bamby)\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Shoed(x))\nFlameproof(bamby) -> Intruding(bamby)\nforall x (Intruding(x) and not Unstrung(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Unstrung(x) and Kindled(x) -> not Intruding(x))\n\nSees(bamby, bamby)\n\nSees(bamby, bamby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1563"} {"premises": "Purcell is caddish. Purcell is not uncoiled. Purcell is gimbaled. If Purcell is not uncoiled then Purcell is winding. If Purcell is sumptuous and Purcell is not uncoiled then Purcell is aquatic. All uncoiled people are sumptuous. If someone is winding then they are sumptuous. Young, sumptuous people are aquatic. All mineral people are not aquatic. If Purcell is not uncoiled then Purcell is gimbaled. If Purcell is mineral and Purcell is not sumptuous then Purcell is gimbaled. Purcell is caddish.", "logic": "\nCaddish(purcell)\nnot Uncoiled(purcell)\nGimbaled(purcell)\nnot Uncoiled(purcell) -> Winding(purcell)\nSumptuous(purcell) and not Uncoiled(purcell) -> Aquatic(purcell)\nforall x (Uncoiled(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Winding(x) -> Sumptuous(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) and Sumptuous(x) -> Aquatic(x))\nforall x (Mineral(x) -> not Aquatic(x))\nnot Uncoiled(purcell) -> Gimbaled(purcell)\nMineral(purcell) and not Sumptuous(purcell) -> Gimbaled(purcell)\n\nCaddish(purcell)\n\ntherefore Caddish(purcell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Denice is assured. Denice is not bipartizan. Denice is widowed. If Denice is not bipartizan then Denice is sexy. If Denice is allantoid and Denice is not bipartizan then Denice is invasive. All bipartizan people are allantoid. If someone is sexy then they are allantoid. Young, allantoid people are invasive. All placatory people are not invasive. If Denice is not bipartizan then Denice is widowed. If Denice is placatory and Denice is not allantoid then Denice is widowed. Denice is bipartizan.", "logic": "\nAssured(denice)\nnot Bipartizan(denice)\nWidowed(denice)\nnot Bipartizan(denice) -> Sexy(denice)\nAllantoid(denice) and not Bipartizan(denice) -> Invasive(denice)\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> Allantoid(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) -> Allantoid(x))\nforall x (Widowed(x) and Allantoid(x) -> Invasive(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) -> not Invasive(x))\nnot Bipartizan(denice) -> Widowed(denice)\nPlacatory(denice) and not Allantoid(denice) -> Widowed(denice)\n\nBipartizan(denice)\n\ntherefore not Bipartizan(denice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Kristal is stormproof. Kristal is not anorexic. Kristal is decussate. If Kristal is not anorexic then Kristal is shouldered. If Kristal is windward and Kristal is not anorexic then Kristal is tipped. All anorexic people are windward. If someone is shouldered then they are windward. Young, windward people are tipped. All dreadful people are not tipped. If Kristal is not anorexic then Kristal is decussate. If Kristal is dreadful and Kristal is not windward then Kristal is decussate. Kristal is shouldered.", "logic": "\nStormproof(kristal)\nnot Anorexic(kristal)\nDecussate(kristal)\nnot Anorexic(kristal) -> Shouldered(kristal)\nWindward(kristal) and not Anorexic(kristal) -> Tipped(kristal)\nforall x (Anorexic(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) and Windward(x) -> Tipped(x))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> not Tipped(x))\nnot Anorexic(kristal) -> Decussate(kristal)\nDreadful(kristal) and not Windward(kristal) -> Decussate(kristal)\n\nShouldered(kristal)\n\nnot Anorexic(kristal) and not Anorexic(kristal) -> Shouldered(kristal) -> therefore Shouldered(kristal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Reta is unrevealed. Reta is not rectified. Reta is grazed. If Reta is not rectified then Reta is papist. If Reta is reverse and Reta is not rectified then Reta is vocalic. All rectified people are reverse. If someone is papist then they are reverse. Young, reverse people are vocalic. All popular people are not vocalic. If Reta is not rectified then Reta is grazed. If Reta is popular and Reta is not reverse then Reta is grazed. Reta is not papist.", "logic": "\nUnrevealed(reta)\nnot Rectified(reta)\nGrazed(reta)\nnot Rectified(reta) -> Papist(reta)\nReverse(reta) and not Rectified(reta) -> Vocalic(reta)\nforall x (Rectified(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Papist(x) -> Reverse(x))\nforall x (Grazed(x) and Reverse(x) -> Vocalic(x))\nforall x (Popular(x) -> not Vocalic(x))\nnot Rectified(reta) -> Grazed(reta)\nPopular(reta) and not Reverse(reta) -> Grazed(reta)\n\nnot Papist(reta)\n\nnot Rectified(reta) and not Rectified(reta) -> Papist(reta) -> therefore Papist(reta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Marcos is amethyst. Marcos is not shambolic. Marcos is mawkish. If Marcos is not shambolic then Marcos is chemic. If Marcos is regal and Marcos is not shambolic then Marcos is outdoor. All shambolic people are regal. If someone is chemic then they are regal. Young, regal people are outdoor. All overactive people are not outdoor. If Marcos is not shambolic then Marcos is mawkish. If Marcos is overactive and Marcos is not regal then Marcos is mawkish. Marcos is regal.", "logic": "\nAmethyst(marcos)\nnot Shambolic(marcos)\nMawkish(marcos)\nnot Shambolic(marcos) -> Chemic(marcos)\nRegal(marcos) and not Shambolic(marcos) -> Outdoor(marcos)\nforall x (Shambolic(x) -> Regal(x))\nforall x (Chemic(x) -> Regal(x))\nforall x (Mawkish(x) and Regal(x) -> Outdoor(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> not Outdoor(x))\nnot Shambolic(marcos) -> Mawkish(marcos)\nOveractive(marcos) and not Regal(marcos) -> Mawkish(marcos)\n\nRegal(marcos)\n\nnot Shambolic(marcos) and not Shambolic(marcos) -> Chemic(marcos) -> therefore Chemic(marcos) Chemic(marcos) and forall x (Chemic(x) -> Regal(x)) -> therefore Regal(marcos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Howard is gobsmacked. Howard is not corinthian. Howard is ignitible. If Howard is not corinthian then Howard is lumpish. If Howard is waspish and Howard is not corinthian then Howard is lento. All corinthian people are waspish. If someone is lumpish then they are waspish. Young, waspish people are lento. All rigged people are not lento. If Howard is not corinthian then Howard is ignitible. If Howard is rigged and Howard is not waspish then Howard is ignitible. Howard is not waspish.", "logic": "\nGobsmacked(howard)\nnot Corinthian(howard)\nIgnitible(howard)\nnot Corinthian(howard) -> Lumpish(howard)\nWaspish(howard) and not Corinthian(howard) -> Lento(howard)\nforall x (Corinthian(x) -> Waspish(x))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Waspish(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Waspish(x) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Rigged(x) -> not Lento(x))\nnot Corinthian(howard) -> Ignitible(howard)\nRigged(howard) and not Waspish(howard) -> Ignitible(howard)\n\nnot Waspish(howard)\n\nnot Corinthian(howard) and not Corinthian(howard) -> Lumpish(howard) -> therefore Lumpish(howard) Lumpish(howard) and forall x (Lumpish(x) -> Waspish(x)) -> therefore Waspish(howard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Vin is prescribed. Vin is not precooled. Vin is coaxing. If Vin is not precooled then Vin is sedgelike. If Vin is promising and Vin is not precooled then Vin is priggish. All precooled people are promising. If someone is sedgelike then they are promising. Young, promising people are priggish. All protrusive people are not priggish. If Vin is not precooled then Vin is coaxing. If Vin is protrusive and Vin is not promising then Vin is coaxing. Vin is priggish.", "logic": "\nPrescribed(vin)\nnot Precooled(vin)\nCoaxing(vin)\nnot Precooled(vin) -> Sedgelike(vin)\nPromising(vin) and not Precooled(vin) -> Priggish(vin)\nforall x (Precooled(x) -> Promising(x))\nforall x (Sedgelike(x) -> Promising(x))\nforall x (Coaxing(x) and Promising(x) -> Priggish(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> not Priggish(x))\nnot Precooled(vin) -> Coaxing(vin)\nProtrusive(vin) and not Promising(vin) -> Coaxing(vin)\n\nPriggish(vin)\n\nnot Precooled(vin) and not Precooled(vin) -> Sedgelike(vin) -> therefore Sedgelike(vin) Sedgelike(vin) and forall x (Sedgelike(x) -> Promising(x)) -> therefore Promising(vin) Coaxing(vin) and Promising(vin) and forall x (Coaxing(x) and Promising(x) -> Priggish(x)) -> therefore Priggish(vin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "Inigo is humongous. Inigo is not windblown. Inigo is stimulated. If Inigo is not windblown then Inigo is endogenic. If Inigo is ferned and Inigo is not windblown then Inigo is mislaid. All windblown people are ferned. If someone is endogenic then they are ferned. Young, ferned people are mislaid. All subdued people are not mislaid. If Inigo is not windblown then Inigo is stimulated. If Inigo is subdued and Inigo is not ferned then Inigo is stimulated. Inigo is not mislaid.", "logic": "\nHumongous(inigo)\nnot Windblown(inigo)\nStimulated(inigo)\nnot Windblown(inigo) -> Endogenic(inigo)\nFerned(inigo) and not Windblown(inigo) -> Mislaid(inigo)\nforall x (Windblown(x) -> Ferned(x))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) -> Ferned(x))\nforall x (Stimulated(x) and Ferned(x) -> Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> not Mislaid(x))\nnot Windblown(inigo) -> Stimulated(inigo)\nSubdued(inigo) and not Ferned(inigo) -> Stimulated(inigo)\n\nnot Mislaid(inigo)\n\nnot Windblown(inigo) and not Windblown(inigo) -> Endogenic(inigo) -> therefore Endogenic(inigo) Endogenic(inigo) and forall x (Endogenic(x) -> Ferned(x)) -> therefore Ferned(inigo) Stimulated(inigo) and Ferned(inigo) and forall x (Stimulated(x) and Ferned(x) -> Mislaid(x)) -> therefore Mislaid(inigo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-176"} {"premises": "The roxie is analogical. The roxie intermarry the adriana. The adriana does not see the candace. The loralee is biaxal. The loralee cognise the candace. The candace is healed. The candace cognise the loralee. If something intermarry the candace then it chill the loralee. If the loralee is biaxal then the loralee does not like the adriana. If the loralee is intragroup then the loralee does not like the adriana. If something is analogical then it intermarry the candace. If something intermarry the roxie and it is not healed then it does not like the loralee. If something cognise the candace then it is analogical. If something intermarry the roxie then the roxie is not analogical. If something intermarry the loralee and the loralee does not like the adriana then the adriana is biaxal. The candace is healed.", "logic": "\nAnalogical(roxie)\nIntermarry(roxie, adriana)\nnot Intermarry(adriana, candace)\nBiaxal(loralee)\nCognise(loralee, candace)\nHealed(candace)\nCognise(candace, loralee)\nforall x (Intermarry(x, candace) -> Chill(x, loralee))\nBiaxal(loralee) -> not Cognise(loralee, adriana)\nIntragroup(loralee) -> not Cognise(loralee, adriana)\nforall x (Analogical(x) -> Intermarry(x, candace))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, roxie) and not Healed(x) -> not Cognise(x, loralee))\nforall x (Cognise(x, candace) -> Analogical(x))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, roxie) -> not Analogical(roxie))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, loralee) and not Cognise(loralee, adriana) -> Biaxal(adriana))\n\nHealed(candace)\n\ntherefore Healed(candace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The merline is satisfying. The merline enchain the antonio. The antonio does not see the ulric. The madelyn is bosomy. The madelyn shellack the ulric. The ulric is towheaded. The ulric shellack the madelyn. If something enchain the ulric then it incise the madelyn. If the madelyn is bosomy then the madelyn does not like the antonio. If the madelyn is exothermic then the madelyn does not like the antonio. If something is satisfying then it enchain the ulric. If something enchain the merline and it is not towheaded then it does not like the madelyn. If something shellack the ulric then it is satisfying. If something enchain the merline then the merline is not satisfying. If something enchain the madelyn and the madelyn does not like the antonio then the antonio is bosomy. The madelyn is not bosomy.", "logic": "\nSatisfying(merline)\nEnchain(merline, antonio)\nnot Enchain(antonio, ulric)\nBosomy(madelyn)\nShellack(madelyn, ulric)\nTowheaded(ulric)\nShellack(ulric, madelyn)\nforall x (Enchain(x, ulric) -> Incise(x, madelyn))\nBosomy(madelyn) -> not Shellack(madelyn, antonio)\nExothermic(madelyn) -> not Shellack(madelyn, antonio)\nforall x (Satisfying(x) -> Enchain(x, ulric))\nforall x (Enchain(x, merline) and not Towheaded(x) -> not Shellack(x, madelyn))\nforall x (Shellack(x, ulric) -> Satisfying(x))\nforall x (Enchain(x, merline) -> not Satisfying(merline))\nforall x (Enchain(x, madelyn) and not Shellack(madelyn, antonio) -> Bosomy(antonio))\n\nnot Bosomy(madelyn)\n\ntherefore Bosomy(madelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The wyn is synoptic. The wyn encase the wyatan. The wyatan does not see the gussie. The zebulon is lackluster. The zebulon swing the gussie. The gussie is current. The gussie swing the zebulon. If something encase the gussie then it enjoin the zebulon. If the zebulon is lackluster then the zebulon does not like the wyatan. If the zebulon is ectozoan then the zebulon does not like the wyatan. If something is synoptic then it encase the gussie. If something encase the wyn and it is not current then it does not like the zebulon. If something swing the gussie then it is synoptic. If something encase the wyn then the wyn is not synoptic. If something encase the zebulon and the zebulon does not like the wyatan then the wyatan is lackluster. The wyn encase the gussie.", "logic": "\nSynoptic(wyn)\nEncase(wyn, wyatan)\nnot Encase(wyatan, gussie)\nLackluster(zebulon)\nSwing(zebulon, gussie)\nCurrent(gussie)\nSwing(gussie, zebulon)\nforall x (Encase(x, gussie) -> Enjoin(x, zebulon))\nLackluster(zebulon) -> not Swing(zebulon, wyatan)\nEctozoan(zebulon) -> not Swing(zebulon, wyatan)\nforall x (Synoptic(x) -> Encase(x, gussie))\nforall x (Encase(x, wyn) and not Current(x) -> not Swing(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Swing(x, gussie) -> Synoptic(x))\nforall x (Encase(x, wyn) -> not Synoptic(wyn))\nforall x (Encase(x, zebulon) and not Swing(zebulon, wyatan) -> Lackluster(wyatan))\n\nEncase(wyn, gussie)\n\nSynoptic(wyn) and forall x (Synoptic(x) -> Encase(x, gussie)) -> therefore Encase(wyn, gussie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The lonee is swollen. The lonee attain the elene. The elene does not see the heddi. The joelie is scaleless. The joelie drawl the heddi. The heddi is toeless. The heddi drawl the joelie. If something attain the heddi then it rest the joelie. If the joelie is scaleless then the joelie does not like the elene. If the joelie is numidian then the joelie does not like the elene. If something is swollen then it attain the heddi. If something attain the lonee and it is not toeless then it does not like the joelie. If something drawl the heddi then it is swollen. If something attain the lonee then the lonee is not swollen. If something attain the joelie and the joelie does not like the elene then the elene is scaleless. The lonee does not see the heddi.", "logic": "\nSwollen(lonee)\nAttain(lonee, elene)\nnot Attain(elene, heddi)\nScaleless(joelie)\nDrawl(joelie, heddi)\nToeless(heddi)\nDrawl(heddi, joelie)\nforall x (Attain(x, heddi) -> Rest(x, joelie))\nScaleless(joelie) -> not Drawl(joelie, elene)\nNumidian(joelie) -> not Drawl(joelie, elene)\nforall x (Swollen(x) -> Attain(x, heddi))\nforall x (Attain(x, lonee) and not Toeless(x) -> not Drawl(x, joelie))\nforall x (Drawl(x, heddi) -> Swollen(x))\nforall x (Attain(x, lonee) -> not Swollen(lonee))\nforall x (Attain(x, joelie) and not Drawl(joelie, elene) -> Scaleless(elene))\n\nnot Attain(lonee, heddi)\n\nSwollen(lonee) and forall x (Swollen(x) -> Attain(x, heddi)) -> therefore Attain(lonee, heddi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The jeanna is meandering. The jeanna sprawl the quillan. The quillan does not see the monika. The colline is marketable. The colline cane the monika. The monika is stale. The monika cane the colline. If something sprawl the monika then it commutate the colline. If the colline is marketable then the colline does not like the quillan. If the colline is trig then the colline does not like the quillan. If something is meandering then it sprawl the monika. If something sprawl the jeanna and it is not stale then it does not like the colline. If something cane the monika then it is meandering. If something sprawl the jeanna then the jeanna is not meandering. If something sprawl the colline and the colline does not like the quillan then the quillan is marketable. The jeanna commutate the colline.", "logic": "\nMeandering(jeanna)\nSprawl(jeanna, quillan)\nnot Sprawl(quillan, monika)\nMarketable(colline)\nCane(colline, monika)\nStale(monika)\nCane(monika, colline)\nforall x (Sprawl(x, monika) -> Commutate(x, colline))\nMarketable(colline) -> not Cane(colline, quillan)\nTrig(colline) -> not Cane(colline, quillan)\nforall x (Meandering(x) -> Sprawl(x, monika))\nforall x (Sprawl(x, jeanna) and not Stale(x) -> not Cane(x, colline))\nforall x (Cane(x, monika) -> Meandering(x))\nforall x (Sprawl(x, jeanna) -> not Meandering(jeanna))\nforall x (Sprawl(x, colline) and not Cane(colline, quillan) -> Marketable(quillan))\n\nCommutate(jeanna, colline)\n\nMeandering(jeanna) and forall x (Meandering(x) -> Sprawl(x, monika)) -> therefore Sprawl(jeanna, monika) Sprawl(jeanna, monika) and forall x (Sprawl(x, monika) -> Commutate(x, colline)) -> therefore Commutate(jeanna, colline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The hamlet is fitful. The hamlet hype the britte. The britte does not see the bari. The wilona is descending. The wilona balloon the bari. The bari is blotchy. The bari balloon the wilona. If something hype the bari then it graduate the wilona. If the wilona is descending then the wilona does not like the britte. If the wilona is inhibitory then the wilona does not like the britte. If something is fitful then it hype the bari. If something hype the hamlet and it is not blotchy then it does not like the wilona. If something balloon the bari then it is fitful. If something hype the hamlet then the hamlet is not fitful. If something hype the wilona and the wilona does not like the britte then the britte is descending. The hamlet does not visit the wilona.", "logic": "\nFitful(hamlet)\nHype(hamlet, britte)\nnot Hype(britte, bari)\nDescending(wilona)\nBalloon(wilona, bari)\nBlotchy(bari)\nBalloon(bari, wilona)\nforall x (Hype(x, bari) -> Graduate(x, wilona))\nDescending(wilona) -> not Balloon(wilona, britte)\nInhibitory(wilona) -> not Balloon(wilona, britte)\nforall x (Fitful(x) -> Hype(x, bari))\nforall x (Hype(x, hamlet) and not Blotchy(x) -> not Balloon(x, wilona))\nforall x (Balloon(x, bari) -> Fitful(x))\nforall x (Hype(x, hamlet) -> not Fitful(hamlet))\nforall x (Hype(x, wilona) and not Balloon(wilona, britte) -> Descending(britte))\n\nnot Graduate(hamlet, wilona)\n\nFitful(hamlet) and forall x (Fitful(x) -> Hype(x, bari)) -> therefore Hype(hamlet, bari) Hype(hamlet, bari) and forall x (Hype(x, bari) -> Graduate(x, wilona)) -> therefore Graduate(hamlet, wilona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The farah is unkind. The farah caution the frayda. The frayda does not see the katie. The vanda is consular. The vanda pepper the katie. The katie is droll. The katie pepper the vanda. If something caution the katie then it gimp the vanda. If the vanda is consular then the vanda does not like the frayda. If the vanda is acold then the vanda does not like the frayda. If something is unkind then it caution the katie. If something caution the farah and it is not droll then it does not like the vanda. If something pepper the katie then it is unkind. If something caution the farah then the farah is not unkind. If something caution the vanda and the vanda does not like the frayda then the frayda is consular. The vanda gimp the vanda.", "logic": "\nUnkind(farah)\nCaution(farah, frayda)\nnot Caution(frayda, katie)\nConsular(vanda)\nPepper(vanda, katie)\nDroll(katie)\nPepper(katie, vanda)\nforall x (Caution(x, katie) -> Gimp(x, vanda))\nConsular(vanda) -> not Pepper(vanda, frayda)\nAcold(vanda) -> not Pepper(vanda, frayda)\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Caution(x, katie))\nforall x (Caution(x, farah) and not Droll(x) -> not Pepper(x, vanda))\nforall x (Pepper(x, katie) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Caution(x, farah) -> not Unkind(farah))\nforall x (Caution(x, vanda) and not Pepper(vanda, frayda) -> Consular(frayda))\n\nGimp(vanda, vanda)\n\nPepper(vanda, katie) and forall x (Pepper(x, katie) -> Unkind(x)) -> therefore Unkind(vanda) Unkind(vanda) and forall x (Unkind(x) -> Caution(x, katie)) -> therefore Caution(vanda, katie) Caution(vanda, katie) and forall x (Caution(x, katie) -> Gimp(x, vanda)) -> therefore Gimp(vanda, vanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The carmelita is gumptious. The carmelita inflect the carleen. The carleen does not see the terri. The amabel is holistic. The amabel grieve the terri. The terri is nonextant. The terri grieve the amabel. If something inflect the terri then it contrive the amabel. If the amabel is holistic then the amabel does not like the carleen. If the amabel is petty then the amabel does not like the carleen. If something is gumptious then it inflect the terri. If something inflect the carmelita and it is not nonextant then it does not like the amabel. If something grieve the terri then it is gumptious. If something inflect the carmelita then the carmelita is not gumptious. If something inflect the amabel and the amabel does not like the carleen then the carleen is holistic. The amabel does not visit the amabel.", "logic": "\nGumptious(carmelita)\nInflect(carmelita, carleen)\nnot Inflect(carleen, terri)\nHolistic(amabel)\nGrieve(amabel, terri)\nNonextant(terri)\nGrieve(terri, amabel)\nforall x (Inflect(x, terri) -> Contrive(x, amabel))\nHolistic(amabel) -> not Grieve(amabel, carleen)\nPetty(amabel) -> not Grieve(amabel, carleen)\nforall x (Gumptious(x) -> Inflect(x, terri))\nforall x (Inflect(x, carmelita) and not Nonextant(x) -> not Grieve(x, amabel))\nforall x (Grieve(x, terri) -> Gumptious(x))\nforall x (Inflect(x, carmelita) -> not Gumptious(carmelita))\nforall x (Inflect(x, amabel) and not Grieve(amabel, carleen) -> Holistic(carleen))\n\nnot Contrive(amabel, amabel)\n\nGrieve(amabel, terri) and forall x (Grieve(x, terri) -> Gumptious(x)) -> therefore Gumptious(amabel) Gumptious(amabel) and forall x (Gumptious(x) -> Inflect(x, terri)) -> therefore Inflect(amabel, terri) Inflect(amabel, terri) and forall x (Inflect(x, terri) -> Contrive(x, amabel)) -> therefore Contrive(amabel, amabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The trey is prenominal. The trey mythicize the leonelle. The leonelle does not see the wilbert. The prissie is nativistic. The prissie dissatisfy the wilbert. The wilbert is deadened. The wilbert dissatisfy the prissie. If something mythicize the wilbert then it cost the prissie. If the prissie is nativistic then the prissie does not like the leonelle. If the prissie is goalless then the prissie does not like the leonelle. If something is prenominal then it mythicize the wilbert. If something mythicize the trey and it is not deadened then it does not like the prissie. If something dissatisfy the wilbert then it is prenominal. If something mythicize the trey then the trey is not prenominal. If something mythicize the prissie and the prissie does not like the leonelle then the leonelle is nativistic. The wilbert does not visit the prissie.", "logic": "\nPrenominal(trey)\nMythicize(trey, leonelle)\nnot Mythicize(leonelle, wilbert)\nNativistic(prissie)\nDissatisfy(prissie, wilbert)\nDeadened(wilbert)\nDissatisfy(wilbert, prissie)\nforall x (Mythicize(x, wilbert) -> Cost(x, prissie))\nNativistic(prissie) -> not Dissatisfy(prissie, leonelle)\nGoalless(prissie) -> not Dissatisfy(prissie, leonelle)\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Mythicize(x, wilbert))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, trey) and not Deadened(x) -> not Dissatisfy(x, prissie))\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, wilbert) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, trey) -> not Prenominal(trey))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, prissie) and not Dissatisfy(prissie, leonelle) -> Nativistic(leonelle))\n\nnot Cost(wilbert, prissie)\n\nforall x (Mythicize(x, wilbert) -> Cost(x, prissie)) <- forall x (Prenominal(x) -> Mythicize(x, wilbert)) <- forall x (Dissatisfy(x, wilbert) -> Prenominal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The adams is inviolate. The adams antiquate the quent. The quent does not see the thalia. The timmie is libidinal. The timmie poke the thalia. The thalia is athletic. The thalia poke the timmie. If something antiquate the thalia then it ruggedize the timmie. If the timmie is libidinal then the timmie does not like the quent. If the timmie is ghanaian then the timmie does not like the quent. If something is inviolate then it antiquate the thalia. If something antiquate the adams and it is not athletic then it does not like the timmie. If something poke the thalia then it is inviolate. If something antiquate the adams then the adams is not inviolate. If something antiquate the timmie and the timmie does not like the quent then the quent is libidinal. The quent ruggedize the timmie.", "logic": "\nInviolate(adams)\nAntiquate(adams, quent)\nnot Antiquate(quent, thalia)\nLibidinal(timmie)\nPoke(timmie, thalia)\nAthletic(thalia)\nPoke(thalia, timmie)\nforall x (Antiquate(x, thalia) -> Ruggedize(x, timmie))\nLibidinal(timmie) -> not Poke(timmie, quent)\nGhanaian(timmie) -> not Poke(timmie, quent)\nforall x (Inviolate(x) -> Antiquate(x, thalia))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, adams) and not Athletic(x) -> not Poke(x, timmie))\nforall x (Poke(x, thalia) -> Inviolate(x))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, adams) -> not Inviolate(adams))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, timmie) and not Poke(timmie, quent) -> Libidinal(quent))\n\nRuggedize(quent, timmie)\n\nforall x (Antiquate(x, thalia) -> Ruggedize(x, timmie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The phelia is fidgety. The phelia subtend the mendel. The mendel does not see the dacey. The sara is operatic. The sara budget the dacey. The dacey is dendroid. The dacey budget the sara. If something subtend the dacey then it concretise the sara. If the sara is operatic then the sara does not like the mendel. If the sara is vaginal then the sara does not like the mendel. If something is fidgety then it subtend the dacey. If something subtend the phelia and it is not dendroid then it does not like the sara. If something budget the dacey then it is fidgety. If something subtend the phelia then the phelia is not fidgety. If something subtend the sara and the sara does not like the mendel then the mendel is operatic. The dacey does not see the dacey.", "logic": "\nFidgety(phelia)\nSubtend(phelia, mendel)\nnot Subtend(mendel, dacey)\nOperatic(sara)\nBudget(sara, dacey)\nDendroid(dacey)\nBudget(dacey, sara)\nforall x (Subtend(x, dacey) -> Concretise(x, sara))\nOperatic(sara) -> not Budget(sara, mendel)\nVaginal(sara) -> not Budget(sara, mendel)\nforall x (Fidgety(x) -> Subtend(x, dacey))\nforall x (Subtend(x, phelia) and not Dendroid(x) -> not Budget(x, sara))\nforall x (Budget(x, dacey) -> Fidgety(x))\nforall x (Subtend(x, phelia) -> not Fidgety(phelia))\nforall x (Subtend(x, sara) and not Budget(sara, mendel) -> Operatic(mendel))\n\nnot Subtend(dacey, dacey)\n\nforall x (Fidgety(x) -> Subtend(x, dacey)) <- forall x (Budget(x, dacey) -> Fidgety(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The ingelbert is glorious. The ingelbert chuck the roderick. The roderick does not see the valentina. The kristina is undetected. The kristina unstrap the valentina. The valentina is boggy. The valentina unstrap the kristina. If something chuck the valentina then it alter the kristina. If the kristina is undetected then the kristina does not like the roderick. If the kristina is alpha then the kristina does not like the roderick. If something is glorious then it chuck the valentina. If something chuck the ingelbert and it is not boggy then it does not like the kristina. If something unstrap the valentina then it is glorious. If something chuck the ingelbert then the ingelbert is not glorious. If something chuck the kristina and the kristina does not like the roderick then the roderick is undetected. The roderick is undetected.", "logic": "\nGlorious(ingelbert)\nChuck(ingelbert, roderick)\nnot Chuck(roderick, valentina)\nUndetected(kristina)\nUnstrap(kristina, valentina)\nBoggy(valentina)\nUnstrap(valentina, kristina)\nforall x (Chuck(x, valentina) -> Alter(x, kristina))\nUndetected(kristina) -> not Unstrap(kristina, roderick)\nAlpha(kristina) -> not Unstrap(kristina, roderick)\nforall x (Glorious(x) -> Chuck(x, valentina))\nforall x (Chuck(x, ingelbert) and not Boggy(x) -> not Unstrap(x, kristina))\nforall x (Unstrap(x, valentina) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Chuck(x, ingelbert) -> not Glorious(ingelbert))\nforall x (Chuck(x, kristina) and not Unstrap(kristina, roderick) -> Undetected(roderick))\n\nUndetected(roderick)\n\nforall x (Chuck(x, kristina) and not Unstrap(kristina, roderick) -> Undetected(roderick)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The cheri is leal. The cheri reacquaint the rebbecca. The rebbecca does not see the sharl. The nichols is arguable. The nichols impoverish the sharl. The sharl is unsatiated. The sharl impoverish the nichols. If something reacquaint the sharl then it degrade the nichols. If the nichols is arguable then the nichols does not like the rebbecca. If the nichols is profound then the nichols does not like the rebbecca. If something is leal then it reacquaint the sharl. If something reacquaint the cheri and it is not unsatiated then it does not like the nichols. If something impoverish the sharl then it is leal. If something reacquaint the cheri then the cheri is not leal. If something reacquaint the nichols and the nichols does not like the rebbecca then the rebbecca is arguable. The nichols does not see the nichols.", "logic": "\nLeal(cheri)\nReacquaint(cheri, rebbecca)\nnot Reacquaint(rebbecca, sharl)\nArguable(nichols)\nImpoverish(nichols, sharl)\nUnsatiated(sharl)\nImpoverish(sharl, nichols)\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, sharl) -> Degrade(x, nichols))\nArguable(nichols) -> not Impoverish(nichols, rebbecca)\nProfound(nichols) -> not Impoverish(nichols, rebbecca)\nforall x (Leal(x) -> Reacquaint(x, sharl))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, cheri) and not Unsatiated(x) -> not Impoverish(x, nichols))\nforall x (Impoverish(x, sharl) -> Leal(x))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, cheri) -> not Leal(cheri))\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, nichols) and not Impoverish(nichols, rebbecca) -> Arguable(rebbecca))\n\nnot Reacquaint(nichols, nichols)\n\nnot Reacquaint(nichols, nichols) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The kitti is beat. The kitti instal the englebert. The englebert does not see the marketa. The skip is tearaway. The skip implement the marketa. The marketa is acerb. The marketa implement the skip. If something instal the marketa then it sonnet the skip. If the skip is tearaway then the skip does not like the englebert. If the skip is insensate then the skip does not like the englebert. If something is beat then it instal the marketa. If something instal the kitti and it is not acerb then it does not like the skip. If something implement the marketa then it is beat. If something instal the kitti then the kitti is not beat. If something instal the skip and the skip does not like the englebert then the englebert is tearaway. The skip implement the skip.", "logic": "\nBeat(kitti)\nInstal(kitti, englebert)\nnot Instal(englebert, marketa)\nTearaway(skip)\nImplement(skip, marketa)\nAcerb(marketa)\nImplement(marketa, skip)\nforall x (Instal(x, marketa) -> Sonnet(x, skip))\nTearaway(skip) -> not Implement(skip, englebert)\nInsensate(skip) -> not Implement(skip, englebert)\nforall x (Beat(x) -> Instal(x, marketa))\nforall x (Instal(x, kitti) and not Acerb(x) -> not Implement(x, skip))\nforall x (Implement(x, marketa) -> Beat(x))\nforall x (Instal(x, kitti) -> not Beat(kitti))\nforall x (Instal(x, skip) and not Implement(skip, englebert) -> Tearaway(englebert))\n\nImplement(skip, skip)\n\nImplement(skip, skip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The clo is lost. The clo prearrange the kath. The kath does not see the geof. The edward is fallible. The edward ascertain the geof. The geof is immaculate. The geof ascertain the edward. If something prearrange the geof then it authorize the edward. If the edward is fallible then the edward does not like the kath. If the edward is bogus then the edward does not like the kath. If something is lost then it prearrange the geof. If something prearrange the clo and it is not immaculate then it does not like the edward. If something ascertain the geof then it is lost. If something prearrange the clo then the clo is not lost. If something prearrange the edward and the edward does not like the kath then the kath is fallible. The edward is not round.", "logic": "\nLost(clo)\nPrearrange(clo, kath)\nnot Prearrange(kath, geof)\nFallible(edward)\nAscertain(edward, geof)\nImmaculate(geof)\nAscertain(geof, edward)\nforall x (Prearrange(x, geof) -> Authorize(x, edward))\nFallible(edward) -> not Ascertain(edward, kath)\nBogus(edward) -> not Ascertain(edward, kath)\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Prearrange(x, geof))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, clo) and not Immaculate(x) -> not Ascertain(x, edward))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, geof) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, clo) -> not Lost(clo))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, edward) and not Ascertain(edward, kath) -> Fallible(kath))\n\nnot Round(edward)\n\nnot Round(edward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "The brooks is agamous. The brooks mature the thomasa. The thomasa does not see the lucilia. The will is misogynic. The will suffice the lucilia. The lucilia is fossil. The lucilia suffice the will. If something mature the lucilia then it solvate the will. If the will is misogynic then the will does not like the thomasa. If the will is jazzy then the will does not like the thomasa. If something is agamous then it mature the lucilia. If something mature the brooks and it is not fossil then it does not like the will. If something suffice the lucilia then it is agamous. If something mature the brooks then the brooks is not agamous. If something mature the will and the will does not like the thomasa then the thomasa is misogynic. The lucilia suffice the lucilia.", "logic": "\nAgamous(brooks)\nMature(brooks, thomasa)\nnot Mature(thomasa, lucilia)\nMisogynic(will)\nSuffice(will, lucilia)\nFossil(lucilia)\nSuffice(lucilia, will)\nforall x (Mature(x, lucilia) -> Solvate(x, will))\nMisogynic(will) -> not Suffice(will, thomasa)\nJazzy(will) -> not Suffice(will, thomasa)\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Mature(x, lucilia))\nforall x (Mature(x, brooks) and not Fossil(x) -> not Suffice(x, will))\nforall x (Suffice(x, lucilia) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Mature(x, brooks) -> not Agamous(brooks))\nforall x (Mature(x, will) and not Suffice(will, thomasa) -> Misogynic(thomasa))\n\nSuffice(lucilia, lucilia)\n\nSuffice(lucilia, lucilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1329"} {"premises": "Gabe is smoking. Gabe is directive. Gabe is pursuing. William is smoking. Cally is not smoking. Cally is organized. Harmonia is inimitable. All nonpublic, pursuing things are bohemian. Green, pursuing things are nonpublic. Green things are pursuing. If William is pursuing and William is inimitable then William is nonpublic. Kind, inimitable things are organized. If something is inimitable and not pursuing then it is smoking. If something is smoking and pursuing then it is directive. If something is smoking and not organized then it is directive. William is smoking.", "logic": "\nSmoking(gabe)\nDirective(gabe)\nPursuing(gabe)\nSmoking(william)\nnot Smoking(cally)\nOrganized(cally)\nInimitable(harmonia)\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) and Pursuing(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Organized(x) and Pursuing(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\nforall x (Organized(x) -> Pursuing(x))\nPursuing(william) and Inimitable(william) -> Nonpublic(william)\nforall x (Pursuing(x) and Inimitable(x) -> Organized(x))\nforall x (Inimitable(x) and not Pursuing(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) and Pursuing(x) -> Directive(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) and not Organized(x) -> Directive(x))\n\nSmoking(william)\n\ntherefore Smoking(william)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Nancey is starved. Nancey is pedantic. Nancey is weedy. Kurtis is starved. Reuven is not starved. Reuven is barmy. Fayette is orchestral. All ungoverned, weedy things are immature. Green, weedy things are ungoverned. Green things are weedy. If Kurtis is weedy and Kurtis is orchestral then Kurtis is ungoverned. Kind, orchestral things are barmy. If something is orchestral and not weedy then it is starved. If something is starved and weedy then it is pedantic. If something is starved and not barmy then it is pedantic. Nancey is not pedantic.", "logic": "\nStarved(nancey)\nPedantic(nancey)\nWeedy(nancey)\nStarved(kurtis)\nnot Starved(reuven)\nBarmy(reuven)\nOrchestral(fayette)\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) and Weedy(x) -> Immature(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) and Weedy(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) -> Weedy(x))\nWeedy(kurtis) and Orchestral(kurtis) -> Ungoverned(kurtis)\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Orchestral(x) -> Barmy(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and not Weedy(x) -> Starved(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) and Weedy(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) and not Barmy(x) -> Pedantic(x))\n\nnot Pedantic(nancey)\n\ntherefore Pedantic(nancey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Curt is delphian. Curt is epithelial. Curt is invasive. Anson is delphian. Margette is not delphian. Margette is jubilant. Analise is brimful. All cured, invasive things are antimonial. Green, invasive things are cured. Green things are invasive. If Anson is invasive and Anson is brimful then Anson is cured. Kind, brimful things are jubilant. If something is brimful and not invasive then it is delphian. If something is delphian and invasive then it is epithelial. If something is delphian and not jubilant then it is epithelial. Margette is invasive.", "logic": "\nDelphian(curt)\nEpithelial(curt)\nInvasive(curt)\nDelphian(anson)\nnot Delphian(margette)\nJubilant(margette)\nBrimful(analise)\nforall x (Cured(x) and Invasive(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) and Invasive(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) -> Invasive(x))\nInvasive(anson) and Brimful(anson) -> Cured(anson)\nforall x (Invasive(x) and Brimful(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Brimful(x) and not Invasive(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Delphian(x) and Invasive(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Delphian(x) and not Jubilant(x) -> Epithelial(x))\n\nInvasive(margette)\n\nJubilant(margette) and forall x (Jubilant(x) -> Invasive(x)) -> therefore Invasive(margette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Coriss is liberated. Coriss is paved. Coriss is shocking. Perle is liberated. Dean is not liberated. Dean is midway. Roman is retinal. All lordly, shocking things are aetiologic. Green, shocking things are lordly. Green things are shocking. If Perle is shocking and Perle is retinal then Perle is lordly. Kind, retinal things are midway. If something is retinal and not shocking then it is liberated. If something is liberated and shocking then it is paved. If something is liberated and not midway then it is paved. Dean is not shocking.", "logic": "\nLiberated(coriss)\nPaved(coriss)\nShocking(coriss)\nLiberated(perle)\nnot Liberated(dean)\nMidway(dean)\nRetinal(roman)\nforall x (Lordly(x) and Shocking(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Midway(x) and Shocking(x) -> Lordly(x))\nforall x (Midway(x) -> Shocking(x))\nShocking(perle) and Retinal(perle) -> Lordly(perle)\nforall x (Shocking(x) and Retinal(x) -> Midway(x))\nforall x (Retinal(x) and not Shocking(x) -> Liberated(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) and Shocking(x) -> Paved(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) and not Midway(x) -> Paved(x))\n\nnot Shocking(dean)\n\nMidway(dean) and forall x (Midway(x) -> Shocking(x)) -> therefore Shocking(dean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Tybie is figured. Tybie is crank. Tybie is esurient. Gayleen is figured. Caressa is not figured. Caressa is hundred. Jeremie is despotic. All dogmatic, esurient things are ungraded. Green, esurient things are dogmatic. Green things are esurient. If Gayleen is esurient and Gayleen is despotic then Gayleen is dogmatic. Kind, despotic things are hundred. If something is despotic and not esurient then it is figured. If something is figured and esurient then it is crank. If something is figured and not hundred then it is crank. Caressa is dogmatic.", "logic": "\nFigured(tybie)\nCrank(tybie)\nEsurient(tybie)\nFigured(gayleen)\nnot Figured(caressa)\nHundred(caressa)\nDespotic(jeremie)\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) and Esurient(x) -> Ungraded(x))\nforall x (Hundred(x) and Esurient(x) -> Dogmatic(x))\nforall x (Hundred(x) -> Esurient(x))\nEsurient(gayleen) and Despotic(gayleen) -> Dogmatic(gayleen)\nforall x (Esurient(x) and Despotic(x) -> Hundred(x))\nforall x (Despotic(x) and not Esurient(x) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Figured(x) and Esurient(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Figured(x) and not Hundred(x) -> Crank(x))\n\nDogmatic(caressa)\n\nHundred(caressa) and forall x (Hundred(x) -> Esurient(x)) -> therefore Esurient(caressa) Hundred(caressa) and Esurient(caressa) and forall x (Hundred(x) and Esurient(x) -> Dogmatic(x)) -> therefore Dogmatic(caressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Katee is corky. Katee is chirpy. Katee is atheist. Liana is corky. Averill is not corky. Averill is legless. Thatcher is glamorous. All vermicular, atheist things are antiviral. Green, atheist things are vermicular. Green things are atheist. If Liana is atheist and Liana is glamorous then Liana is vermicular. Kind, glamorous things are legless. If something is glamorous and not atheist then it is corky. If something is corky and atheist then it is chirpy. If something is corky and not legless then it is chirpy. Averill is not vermicular.", "logic": "\nCorky(katee)\nChirpy(katee)\nAtheist(katee)\nCorky(liana)\nnot Corky(averill)\nLegless(averill)\nGlamorous(thatcher)\nforall x (Vermicular(x) and Atheist(x) -> Antiviral(x))\nforall x (Legless(x) and Atheist(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Legless(x) -> Atheist(x))\nAtheist(liana) and Glamorous(liana) -> Vermicular(liana)\nforall x (Atheist(x) and Glamorous(x) -> Legless(x))\nforall x (Glamorous(x) and not Atheist(x) -> Corky(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) and Atheist(x) -> Chirpy(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) and not Legless(x) -> Chirpy(x))\n\nnot Vermicular(averill)\n\nLegless(averill) and forall x (Legless(x) -> Atheist(x)) -> therefore Atheist(averill) Legless(averill) and Atheist(averill) and forall x (Legless(x) and Atheist(x) -> Vermicular(x)) -> therefore Vermicular(averill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Cary is deciding. Cary is seamy. Cary is deceased. Mellicent is deciding. Amanda is not deciding. Amanda is kempt. Val is peppery. All intrinsic, deceased things are cenobitic. Green, deceased things are intrinsic. Green things are deceased. If Mellicent is deceased and Mellicent is peppery then Mellicent is intrinsic. Kind, peppery things are kempt. If something is peppery and not deceased then it is deciding. If something is deciding and deceased then it is seamy. If something is deciding and not kempt then it is seamy. Amanda is cenobitic.", "logic": "\nDeciding(cary)\nSeamy(cary)\nDeceased(cary)\nDeciding(mellicent)\nnot Deciding(amanda)\nKempt(amanda)\nPeppery(val)\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) and Deceased(x) -> Cenobitic(x))\nforall x (Kempt(x) and Deceased(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Kempt(x) -> Deceased(x))\nDeceased(mellicent) and Peppery(mellicent) -> Intrinsic(mellicent)\nforall x (Deceased(x) and Peppery(x) -> Kempt(x))\nforall x (Peppery(x) and not Deceased(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Deceased(x) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and not Kempt(x) -> Seamy(x))\n\nCenobitic(amanda)\n\nKempt(amanda) and forall x (Kempt(x) -> Deceased(x)) -> therefore Deceased(amanda) Kempt(amanda) and Deceased(amanda) and forall x (Kempt(x) and Deceased(x) -> Intrinsic(x)) -> therefore Intrinsic(amanda) Kempt(amanda) and forall x (Kempt(x) -> Deceased(x)) -> therefore Deceased(amanda) Intrinsic(amanda) and Deceased(amanda) and forall x (Intrinsic(x) and Deceased(x) -> Cenobitic(x)) -> therefore Cenobitic(amanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Penn is bodily. Penn is flukey. Penn is emerging. Hephzibah is bodily. Clayborne is not bodily. Clayborne is ridiculous. Edi is determined. All foxy, emerging things are pasty. Green, emerging things are foxy. Green things are emerging. If Hephzibah is emerging and Hephzibah is determined then Hephzibah is foxy. Kind, determined things are ridiculous. If something is determined and not emerging then it is bodily. If something is bodily and emerging then it is flukey. If something is bodily and not ridiculous then it is flukey. Clayborne is not pasty.", "logic": "\nBodily(penn)\nFlukey(penn)\nEmerging(penn)\nBodily(hephzibah)\nnot Bodily(clayborne)\nRidiculous(clayborne)\nDetermined(edi)\nforall x (Foxy(x) and Emerging(x) -> Pasty(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) and Emerging(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Emerging(x))\nEmerging(hephzibah) and Determined(hephzibah) -> Foxy(hephzibah)\nforall x (Emerging(x) and Determined(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Determined(x) and not Emerging(x) -> Bodily(x))\nforall x (Bodily(x) and Emerging(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Bodily(x) and not Ridiculous(x) -> Flukey(x))\n\nnot Pasty(clayborne)\n\nRidiculous(clayborne) and forall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Emerging(x)) -> therefore Emerging(clayborne) Ridiculous(clayborne) and Emerging(clayborne) and forall x (Ridiculous(x) and Emerging(x) -> Foxy(x)) -> therefore Foxy(clayborne) Ridiculous(clayborne) and forall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Emerging(x)) -> therefore Emerging(clayborne) Foxy(clayborne) and Emerging(clayborne) and forall x (Foxy(x) and Emerging(x) -> Pasty(x)) -> therefore Pasty(clayborne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Gae is aired. Gae is inflamed. Gae is amharic. Orson is aired. Tabbie is not aired. Tabbie is singular. Collette is cockamamy. All paroicous, amharic things are full. Green, amharic things are paroicous. Green things are amharic. If Orson is amharic and Orson is cockamamy then Orson is paroicous. Kind, cockamamy things are singular. If something is cockamamy and not amharic then it is aired. If something is aired and amharic then it is inflamed. If something is aired and not singular then it is inflamed. Collette is not full.", "logic": "\nAired(gae)\nInflamed(gae)\nAmharic(gae)\nAired(orson)\nnot Aired(tabbie)\nSingular(tabbie)\nCockamamy(collette)\nforall x (Paroicous(x) and Amharic(x) -> Full(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) and Amharic(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Amharic(x))\nAmharic(orson) and Cockamamy(orson) -> Paroicous(orson)\nforall x (Amharic(x) and Cockamamy(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Cockamamy(x) and not Amharic(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Aired(x) and Amharic(x) -> Inflamed(x))\nforall x (Aired(x) and not Singular(x) -> Inflamed(x))\n\nnot Full(collette)\n\nforall x (Paroicous(x) and Amharic(x) -> Full(x)) <- forall x (Singular(x) -> Amharic(x)) <- forall x (Amharic(x) and Cockamamy(x) -> Singular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Wilona is paraplegic. Wilona is contralto. Wilona is teasing. Ambur is paraplegic. Chadd is not paraplegic. Chadd is piebald. Brunhilde is unfixed. All useable, teasing things are loverly. Green, teasing things are useable. Green things are teasing. If Ambur is teasing and Ambur is unfixed then Ambur is useable. Kind, unfixed things are piebald. If something is unfixed and not teasing then it is paraplegic. If something is paraplegic and teasing then it is contralto. If something is paraplegic and not piebald then it is contralto. Brunhilde is contralto.", "logic": "\nParaplegic(wilona)\nContralto(wilona)\nTeasing(wilona)\nParaplegic(ambur)\nnot Paraplegic(chadd)\nPiebald(chadd)\nUnfixed(brunhilde)\nforall x (Useable(x) and Teasing(x) -> Loverly(x))\nforall x (Piebald(x) and Teasing(x) -> Useable(x))\nforall x (Piebald(x) -> Teasing(x))\nTeasing(ambur) and Unfixed(ambur) -> Useable(ambur)\nforall x (Teasing(x) and Unfixed(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Unfixed(x) and not Teasing(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) and Teasing(x) -> Contralto(x))\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) and not Piebald(x) -> Contralto(x))\n\nContralto(brunhilde)\n\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) and Teasing(x) -> Contralto(x)) <- forall x (Unfixed(x) and not Teasing(x) -> Paraplegic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Gretchen is seamless. Gretchen is killing. Gretchen is minus. Modestine is seamless. Caro is not seamless. Caro is invidious. Lorette is coiled. All duodenal, minus things are gratified. Green, minus things are duodenal. Green things are minus. If Modestine is minus and Modestine is coiled then Modestine is duodenal. Kind, coiled things are invidious. If something is coiled and not minus then it is seamless. If something is seamless and minus then it is killing. If something is seamless and not invidious then it is killing. Lorette is not invidious.", "logic": "\nSeamless(gretchen)\nKilling(gretchen)\nMinus(gretchen)\nSeamless(modestine)\nnot Seamless(caro)\nInvidious(caro)\nCoiled(lorette)\nforall x (Duodenal(x) and Minus(x) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Minus(x) -> Duodenal(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) -> Minus(x))\nMinus(modestine) and Coiled(modestine) -> Duodenal(modestine)\nforall x (Minus(x) and Coiled(x) -> Invidious(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) and not Minus(x) -> Seamless(x))\nforall x (Seamless(x) and Minus(x) -> Killing(x))\nforall x (Seamless(x) and not Invidious(x) -> Killing(x))\n\nnot Invidious(lorette)\n\nforall x (Minus(x) and Coiled(x) -> Invidious(x)) <- forall x (Invidious(x) -> Minus(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Kelcy is vapourised. Kelcy is potbellied. Kelcy is skim. Lianne is vapourised. Leif is not vapourised. Leif is melting. Hanford is courtly. All distorted, skim things are ashamed. Green, skim things are distorted. Green things are skim. If Lianne is skim and Lianne is courtly then Lianne is distorted. Kind, courtly things are melting. If something is courtly and not skim then it is vapourised. If something is vapourised and skim then it is potbellied. If something is vapourised and not melting then it is potbellied. Lianne is melting.", "logic": "\nVapourised(kelcy)\nPotbellied(kelcy)\nSkim(kelcy)\nVapourised(lianne)\nnot Vapourised(leif)\nMelting(leif)\nCourtly(hanford)\nforall x (Distorted(x) and Skim(x) -> Ashamed(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) and Skim(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Skim(x))\nSkim(lianne) and Courtly(lianne) -> Distorted(lianne)\nforall x (Skim(x) and Courtly(x) -> Melting(x))\nforall x (Courtly(x) and not Skim(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Skim(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and not Melting(x) -> Potbellied(x))\n\nMelting(lianne)\n\nforall x (Skim(x) and Courtly(x) -> Melting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Cariotta is leading. Cariotta is synchronal. Cariotta is grooved. Betti is leading. Garcon is not leading. Garcon is scandent. Saxon is prognostic. All carbonic, grooved things are russet. Green, grooved things are carbonic. Green things are grooved. If Betti is grooved and Betti is prognostic then Betti is carbonic. Kind, prognostic things are scandent. If something is prognostic and not grooved then it is leading. If something is leading and grooved then it is synchronal. If something is leading and not scandent then it is synchronal. Betti is not prognostic.", "logic": "\nLeading(cariotta)\nSynchronal(cariotta)\nGrooved(cariotta)\nLeading(betti)\nnot Leading(garcon)\nScandent(garcon)\nPrognostic(saxon)\nforall x (Carbonic(x) and Grooved(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Scandent(x) and Grooved(x) -> Carbonic(x))\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Grooved(x))\nGrooved(betti) and Prognostic(betti) -> Carbonic(betti)\nforall x (Grooved(x) and Prognostic(x) -> Scandent(x))\nforall x (Prognostic(x) and not Grooved(x) -> Leading(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) and Grooved(x) -> Synchronal(x))\nforall x (Leading(x) and not Scandent(x) -> Synchronal(x))\n\nnot Prognostic(betti)\n\nnot Prognostic(betti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Kristan is hebdomadal. Kristan is stepwise. Kristan is inboard. Alica is hebdomadal. Annamaria is not hebdomadal. Annamaria is awash. Imogen is auld. All esthetical, inboard things are fervent. Green, inboard things are esthetical. Green things are inboard. If Alica is inboard and Alica is auld then Alica is esthetical. Kind, auld things are awash. If something is auld and not inboard then it is hebdomadal. If something is hebdomadal and inboard then it is stepwise. If something is hebdomadal and not awash then it is stepwise. Annamaria is auld.", "logic": "\nHebdomadal(kristan)\nStepwise(kristan)\nInboard(kristan)\nHebdomadal(alica)\nnot Hebdomadal(annamaria)\nAwash(annamaria)\nAuld(imogen)\nforall x (Esthetical(x) and Inboard(x) -> Fervent(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) and Inboard(x) -> Esthetical(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) -> Inboard(x))\nInboard(alica) and Auld(alica) -> Esthetical(alica)\nforall x (Inboard(x) and Auld(x) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Auld(x) and not Inboard(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Inboard(x) -> Stepwise(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and not Awash(x) -> Stepwise(x))\n\nAuld(annamaria)\n\nAuld(annamaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-120"} {"premises": "Madelyn is maritime. Aldus is shining. Aldus is maritime. Vite is disliked. Vite is attested. Vite is cheeselike. Amy is maritime. Amy is disliked. Amy is attested. Amy is cheeselike. All disliked, maritime things are shining. If Madelyn is maritime then Madelyn is disliked. If Madelyn is disliked and Madelyn is shining then Madelyn is attested. If Vite is attested and Vite is cheeselike then Vite is bullheaded. All disliked things are bullheaded. Furry, bullheaded things are cheeselike. Aldus is maritime.", "logic": "\nMaritime(madelyn)\nShining(aldus)\nMaritime(aldus)\nDisliked(vite)\nAttested(vite)\nCheeselike(vite)\nMaritime(amy)\nDisliked(amy)\nAttested(amy)\nCheeselike(amy)\nforall x (Disliked(x) and Maritime(x) -> Shining(x))\nMaritime(madelyn) -> Disliked(madelyn)\nDisliked(madelyn) and Shining(madelyn) -> Attested(madelyn)\nAttested(vite) and Cheeselike(vite) -> Bullheaded(vite)\nforall x (Disliked(x) -> Bullheaded(x))\nforall x (Shining(x) and Bullheaded(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\n\nMaritime(aldus)\n\ntherefore Maritime(aldus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Gertruda is lowbred. Cliff is chanted. Cliff is lowbred. Torre is screechy. Torre is nonskid. Torre is unshaken. Timmie is lowbred. Timmie is screechy. Timmie is nonskid. Timmie is unshaken. All screechy, lowbred things are chanted. If Gertruda is lowbred then Gertruda is screechy. If Gertruda is screechy and Gertruda is chanted then Gertruda is nonskid. If Torre is nonskid and Torre is unshaken then Torre is boggy. All screechy things are boggy. Furry, boggy things are unshaken. Timmie is not nonskid.", "logic": "\nLowbred(gertruda)\nChanted(cliff)\nLowbred(cliff)\nScreechy(torre)\nNonskid(torre)\nUnshaken(torre)\nLowbred(timmie)\nScreechy(timmie)\nNonskid(timmie)\nUnshaken(timmie)\nforall x (Screechy(x) and Lowbred(x) -> Chanted(x))\nLowbred(gertruda) -> Screechy(gertruda)\nScreechy(gertruda) and Chanted(gertruda) -> Nonskid(gertruda)\nNonskid(torre) and Unshaken(torre) -> Boggy(torre)\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) and Boggy(x) -> Unshaken(x))\n\nnot Nonskid(timmie)\n\ntherefore Nonskid(timmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Timotheus is silicious. Piet is dyslectic. Piet is silicious. Laurance is oleophobic. Laurance is glinting. Laurance is aggravated. Essa is silicious. Essa is oleophobic. Essa is glinting. Essa is aggravated. All oleophobic, silicious things are dyslectic. If Timotheus is silicious then Timotheus is oleophobic. If Timotheus is oleophobic and Timotheus is dyslectic then Timotheus is glinting. If Laurance is glinting and Laurance is aggravated then Laurance is malign. All oleophobic things are malign. Furry, malign things are aggravated. Essa is dyslectic.", "logic": "\nSilicious(timotheus)\nDyslectic(piet)\nSilicious(piet)\nOleophobic(laurance)\nGlinting(laurance)\nAggravated(laurance)\nSilicious(essa)\nOleophobic(essa)\nGlinting(essa)\nAggravated(essa)\nforall x (Oleophobic(x) and Silicious(x) -> Dyslectic(x))\nSilicious(timotheus) -> Oleophobic(timotheus)\nOleophobic(timotheus) and Dyslectic(timotheus) -> Glinting(timotheus)\nGlinting(laurance) and Aggravated(laurance) -> Malign(laurance)\nforall x (Oleophobic(x) -> Malign(x))\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) and Malign(x) -> Aggravated(x))\n\nDyslectic(essa)\n\nOleophobic(essa) and Silicious(essa) and forall x (Oleophobic(x) and Silicious(x) -> Dyslectic(x)) -> therefore Dyslectic(essa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Tallia is opencast. Sharona is numerable. Sharona is opencast. Anstice is catechetic. Anstice is dateable. Anstice is musing. Jacob is opencast. Jacob is catechetic. Jacob is dateable. Jacob is musing. All catechetic, opencast things are numerable. If Tallia is opencast then Tallia is catechetic. If Tallia is catechetic and Tallia is numerable then Tallia is dateable. If Anstice is dateable and Anstice is musing then Anstice is center. All catechetic things are center. Furry, center things are musing. Anstice is not center.", "logic": "\nOpencast(tallia)\nNumerable(sharona)\nOpencast(sharona)\nCatechetic(anstice)\nDateable(anstice)\nMusing(anstice)\nOpencast(jacob)\nCatechetic(jacob)\nDateable(jacob)\nMusing(jacob)\nforall x (Catechetic(x) and Opencast(x) -> Numerable(x))\nOpencast(tallia) -> Catechetic(tallia)\nCatechetic(tallia) and Numerable(tallia) -> Dateable(tallia)\nDateable(anstice) and Musing(anstice) -> Center(anstice)\nforall x (Catechetic(x) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Numerable(x) and Center(x) -> Musing(x))\n\nnot Center(anstice)\n\nCatechetic(anstice) and forall x (Catechetic(x) -> Center(x)) -> therefore Center(anstice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Clea is snafu. Joletta is bygone. Joletta is snafu. Nolana is gladdened. Nolana is empathic. Nolana is potential. Orsa is snafu. Orsa is gladdened. Orsa is empathic. Orsa is potential. All gladdened, snafu things are bygone. If Clea is snafu then Clea is gladdened. If Clea is gladdened and Clea is bygone then Clea is empathic. If Nolana is empathic and Nolana is potential then Nolana is unscathed. All gladdened things are unscathed. Furry, unscathed things are potential. Clea is unscathed.", "logic": "\nSnafu(clea)\nBygone(joletta)\nSnafu(joletta)\nGladdened(nolana)\nEmpathic(nolana)\nPotential(nolana)\nSnafu(orsa)\nGladdened(orsa)\nEmpathic(orsa)\nPotential(orsa)\nforall x (Gladdened(x) and Snafu(x) -> Bygone(x))\nSnafu(clea) -> Gladdened(clea)\nGladdened(clea) and Bygone(clea) -> Empathic(clea)\nEmpathic(nolana) and Potential(nolana) -> Unscathed(nolana)\nforall x (Gladdened(x) -> Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Bygone(x) and Unscathed(x) -> Potential(x))\n\nUnscathed(clea)\n\nSnafu(clea) and Snafu(clea) -> Gladdened(clea) -> therefore Gladdened(clea) Gladdened(clea) and forall x (Gladdened(x) -> Unscathed(x)) -> therefore Unscathed(clea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Shira is streaming. Wyn is positional. Wyn is streaming. Coraline is alliaceous. Coraline is interred. Coraline is amort. Alta is streaming. Alta is alliaceous. Alta is interred. Alta is amort. All alliaceous, streaming things are positional. If Shira is streaming then Shira is alliaceous. If Shira is alliaceous and Shira is positional then Shira is interred. If Coraline is interred and Coraline is amort then Coraline is tympanic. All alliaceous things are tympanic. Furry, tympanic things are amort. Shira is not positional.", "logic": "\nStreaming(shira)\nPositional(wyn)\nStreaming(wyn)\nAlliaceous(coraline)\nInterred(coraline)\nAmort(coraline)\nStreaming(alta)\nAlliaceous(alta)\nInterred(alta)\nAmort(alta)\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) and Streaming(x) -> Positional(x))\nStreaming(shira) -> Alliaceous(shira)\nAlliaceous(shira) and Positional(shira) -> Interred(shira)\nInterred(coraline) and Amort(coraline) -> Tympanic(coraline)\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) -> Tympanic(x))\nforall x (Positional(x) and Tympanic(x) -> Amort(x))\n\nnot Positional(shira)\n\nStreaming(shira) and Streaming(shira) -> Alliaceous(shira) -> therefore Alliaceous(shira) Alliaceous(shira) and Streaming(shira) and forall x (Alliaceous(x) and Streaming(x) -> Positional(x)) -> therefore Positional(shira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Hedda is bleak. Ronnica is nativistic. Ronnica is bleak. Datha is vigilant. Datha is diminished. Datha is witchlike. Helsa is bleak. Helsa is vigilant. Helsa is diminished. Helsa is witchlike. All vigilant, bleak things are nativistic. If Hedda is bleak then Hedda is vigilant. If Hedda is vigilant and Hedda is nativistic then Hedda is diminished. If Datha is diminished and Datha is witchlike then Datha is abasic. All vigilant things are abasic. Furry, abasic things are witchlike. Hedda is witchlike.", "logic": "\nBleak(hedda)\nNativistic(ronnica)\nBleak(ronnica)\nVigilant(datha)\nDiminished(datha)\nWitchlike(datha)\nBleak(helsa)\nVigilant(helsa)\nDiminished(helsa)\nWitchlike(helsa)\nforall x (Vigilant(x) and Bleak(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nBleak(hedda) -> Vigilant(hedda)\nVigilant(hedda) and Nativistic(hedda) -> Diminished(hedda)\nDiminished(datha) and Witchlike(datha) -> Abasic(datha)\nforall x (Vigilant(x) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Abasic(x) -> Witchlike(x))\n\nWitchlike(hedda)\n\nBleak(hedda) and Bleak(hedda) -> Vigilant(hedda) -> therefore Vigilant(hedda) Vigilant(hedda) and Bleak(hedda) and forall x (Vigilant(x) and Bleak(x) -> Nativistic(x)) -> therefore Nativistic(hedda) Bleak(hedda) and Bleak(hedda) -> Vigilant(hedda) -> therefore Vigilant(hedda) Vigilant(hedda) and forall x (Vigilant(x) -> Abasic(x)) -> therefore Abasic(hedda) Nativistic(hedda) and Abasic(hedda) and forall x (Nativistic(x) and Abasic(x) -> Witchlike(x)) -> therefore Witchlike(hedda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Stern is quack. Dede is confirming. Dede is quack. Nancie is oblique. Nancie is cyclonic. Nancie is moonless. Eada is quack. Eada is oblique. Eada is cyclonic. Eada is moonless. All oblique, quack things are confirming. If Stern is quack then Stern is oblique. If Stern is oblique and Stern is confirming then Stern is cyclonic. If Nancie is cyclonic and Nancie is moonless then Nancie is airless. All oblique things are airless. Furry, airless things are moonless. Stern is not cyclonic.", "logic": "\nQuack(stern)\nConfirming(dede)\nQuack(dede)\nOblique(nancie)\nCyclonic(nancie)\nMoonless(nancie)\nQuack(eada)\nOblique(eada)\nCyclonic(eada)\nMoonless(eada)\nforall x (Oblique(x) and Quack(x) -> Confirming(x))\nQuack(stern) -> Oblique(stern)\nOblique(stern) and Confirming(stern) -> Cyclonic(stern)\nCyclonic(nancie) and Moonless(nancie) -> Airless(nancie)\nforall x (Oblique(x) -> Airless(x))\nforall x (Confirming(x) and Airless(x) -> Moonless(x))\n\nnot Cyclonic(stern)\n\nQuack(stern) and Quack(stern) -> Oblique(stern) -> therefore Oblique(stern) Quack(stern) and Quack(stern) -> Oblique(stern) -> therefore Oblique(stern) Oblique(stern) and Quack(stern) and forall x (Oblique(x) and Quack(x) -> Confirming(x)) -> therefore Confirming(stern) Oblique(stern) and Confirming(stern) and Oblique(stern) and Confirming(stern) -> Cyclonic(stern) -> therefore Cyclonic(stern)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Sampson is profitable. Waylon is brumous. Waylon is profitable. Prue is numbing. Prue is minus. Prue is thawed. Lita is profitable. Lita is numbing. Lita is minus. Lita is thawed. All numbing, profitable things are brumous. If Sampson is profitable then Sampson is numbing. If Sampson is numbing and Sampson is brumous then Sampson is minus. If Prue is minus and Prue is thawed then Prue is edematous. All numbing things are edematous. Furry, edematous things are thawed. Waylon is not thawed.", "logic": "\nProfitable(sampson)\nBrumous(waylon)\nProfitable(waylon)\nNumbing(prue)\nMinus(prue)\nThawed(prue)\nProfitable(lita)\nNumbing(lita)\nMinus(lita)\nThawed(lita)\nforall x (Numbing(x) and Profitable(x) -> Brumous(x))\nProfitable(sampson) -> Numbing(sampson)\nNumbing(sampson) and Brumous(sampson) -> Minus(sampson)\nMinus(prue) and Thawed(prue) -> Edematous(prue)\nforall x (Numbing(x) -> Edematous(x))\nforall x (Brumous(x) and Edematous(x) -> Thawed(x))\n\nnot Thawed(waylon)\n\nforall x (Brumous(x) and Edematous(x) -> Thawed(x)) <- forall x (Numbing(x) -> Edematous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Eilis is presto. Trudy is kashmiri. Trudy is presto. Marrilee is angled. Marrilee is deadened. Marrilee is daunted. Dick is presto. Dick is angled. Dick is deadened. Dick is daunted. All angled, presto things are kashmiri. If Eilis is presto then Eilis is angled. If Eilis is angled and Eilis is kashmiri then Eilis is deadened. If Marrilee is deadened and Marrilee is daunted then Marrilee is czaristic. All angled things are czaristic. Furry, czaristic things are daunted. Trudy is czaristic.", "logic": "\nPresto(eilis)\nKashmiri(trudy)\nPresto(trudy)\nAngled(marrilee)\nDeadened(marrilee)\nDaunted(marrilee)\nPresto(dick)\nAngled(dick)\nDeadened(dick)\nDaunted(dick)\nforall x (Angled(x) and Presto(x) -> Kashmiri(x))\nPresto(eilis) -> Angled(eilis)\nAngled(eilis) and Kashmiri(eilis) -> Deadened(eilis)\nDeadened(marrilee) and Daunted(marrilee) -> Czaristic(marrilee)\nforall x (Angled(x) -> Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Kashmiri(x) and Czaristic(x) -> Daunted(x))\n\nCzaristic(trudy)\n\nforall x (Angled(x) -> Czaristic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Ferdy is evaporable. Aloise is ungentle. Aloise is evaporable. Dusty is mephitic. Dusty is aberrant. Dusty is sexual. Giraud is evaporable. Giraud is mephitic. Giraud is aberrant. Giraud is sexual. All mephitic, evaporable things are ungentle. If Ferdy is evaporable then Ferdy is mephitic. If Ferdy is mephitic and Ferdy is ungentle then Ferdy is aberrant. If Dusty is aberrant and Dusty is sexual then Dusty is famous. All mephitic things are famous. Furry, famous things are sexual. Dusty is not ungentle.", "logic": "\nEvaporable(ferdy)\nUngentle(aloise)\nEvaporable(aloise)\nMephitic(dusty)\nAberrant(dusty)\nSexual(dusty)\nEvaporable(giraud)\nMephitic(giraud)\nAberrant(giraud)\nSexual(giraud)\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and Evaporable(x) -> Ungentle(x))\nEvaporable(ferdy) -> Mephitic(ferdy)\nMephitic(ferdy) and Ungentle(ferdy) -> Aberrant(ferdy)\nAberrant(dusty) and Sexual(dusty) -> Famous(dusty)\nforall x (Mephitic(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) and Famous(x) -> Sexual(x))\n\nnot Ungentle(dusty)\n\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and Evaporable(x) -> Ungentle(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Connolly is elating. Jacquelyn is biggish. Jacquelyn is elating. Skylar is marvellous. Skylar is empty. Skylar is sorbed. Bevvy is elating. Bevvy is marvellous. Bevvy is empty. Bevvy is sorbed. All marvellous, elating things are biggish. If Connolly is elating then Connolly is marvellous. If Connolly is marvellous and Connolly is biggish then Connolly is empty. If Skylar is empty and Skylar is sorbed then Skylar is omnivorous. All marvellous things are omnivorous. Furry, omnivorous things are sorbed. Skylar is elating.", "logic": "\nElating(connolly)\nBiggish(jacquelyn)\nElating(jacquelyn)\nMarvellous(skylar)\nEmpty(skylar)\nSorbed(skylar)\nElating(bevvy)\nMarvellous(bevvy)\nEmpty(bevvy)\nSorbed(bevvy)\nforall x (Marvellous(x) and Elating(x) -> Biggish(x))\nElating(connolly) -> Marvellous(connolly)\nMarvellous(connolly) and Biggish(connolly) -> Empty(connolly)\nEmpty(skylar) and Sorbed(skylar) -> Omnivorous(skylar)\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Omnivorous(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) and Omnivorous(x) -> Sorbed(x))\n\nElating(skylar)\n\nElating(skylar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Chrissa is standing. Anders is frisky. Anders is standing. Bobbette is azonic. Bobbette is humble. Bobbette is brazilian. Tamarra is standing. Tamarra is azonic. Tamarra is humble. Tamarra is brazilian. All azonic, standing things are frisky. If Chrissa is standing then Chrissa is azonic. If Chrissa is azonic and Chrissa is frisky then Chrissa is humble. If Bobbette is humble and Bobbette is brazilian then Bobbette is contraband. All azonic things are contraband. Furry, contraband things are brazilian. Anders is not azonic.", "logic": "\nStanding(chrissa)\nFrisky(anders)\nStanding(anders)\nAzonic(bobbette)\nHumble(bobbette)\nBrazilian(bobbette)\nStanding(tamarra)\nAzonic(tamarra)\nHumble(tamarra)\nBrazilian(tamarra)\nforall x (Azonic(x) and Standing(x) -> Frisky(x))\nStanding(chrissa) -> Azonic(chrissa)\nAzonic(chrissa) and Frisky(chrissa) -> Humble(chrissa)\nHumble(bobbette) and Brazilian(bobbette) -> Contraband(bobbette)\nforall x (Azonic(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Frisky(x) and Contraband(x) -> Brazilian(x))\n\nnot Azonic(anders)\n\nnot Azonic(anders) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Windham is obtuse. Conny is mitigatory. Conny is obtuse. Rhett is sepaloid. Rhett is bicornuate. Rhett is carousing. Kellen is obtuse. Kellen is sepaloid. Kellen is bicornuate. Kellen is carousing. All sepaloid, obtuse things are mitigatory. If Windham is obtuse then Windham is sepaloid. If Windham is sepaloid and Windham is mitigatory then Windham is bicornuate. If Rhett is bicornuate and Rhett is carousing then Rhett is bleak. All sepaloid things are bleak. Furry, bleak things are carousing. Conny is blue.", "logic": "\nObtuse(windham)\nMitigatory(conny)\nObtuse(conny)\nSepaloid(rhett)\nBicornuate(rhett)\nCarousing(rhett)\nObtuse(kellen)\nSepaloid(kellen)\nBicornuate(kellen)\nCarousing(kellen)\nforall x (Sepaloid(x) and Obtuse(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\nObtuse(windham) -> Sepaloid(windham)\nSepaloid(windham) and Mitigatory(windham) -> Bicornuate(windham)\nBicornuate(rhett) and Carousing(rhett) -> Bleak(rhett)\nforall x (Sepaloid(x) -> Bleak(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and Bleak(x) -> Carousing(x))\n\nBlue(conny)\n\nBlue(conny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Martin is educative. Ginny is antiquated. Ginny is educative. Selby is evitable. Selby is fictile. Selby is specious. Betta is educative. Betta is evitable. Betta is fictile. Betta is specious. All evitable, educative things are antiquated. If Martin is educative then Martin is evitable. If Martin is evitable and Martin is antiquated then Martin is fictile. If Selby is fictile and Selby is specious then Selby is beardown. All evitable things are beardown. Furry, beardown things are specious. Martin is not blue.", "logic": "\nEducative(martin)\nAntiquated(ginny)\nEducative(ginny)\nEvitable(selby)\nFictile(selby)\nSpecious(selby)\nEducative(betta)\nEvitable(betta)\nFictile(betta)\nSpecious(betta)\nforall x (Evitable(x) and Educative(x) -> Antiquated(x))\nEducative(martin) -> Evitable(martin)\nEvitable(martin) and Antiquated(martin) -> Fictile(martin)\nFictile(selby) and Specious(selby) -> Beardown(selby)\nforall x (Evitable(x) -> Beardown(x))\nforall x (Antiquated(x) and Beardown(x) -> Specious(x))\n\nnot Blue(martin)\n\nnot Blue(martin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "Reinhard is stooping. Griffith is blameable. Griffith is stooping. Valene is runproof. Valene is amerindic. Valene is expendable. Almeta is stooping. Almeta is runproof. Almeta is amerindic. Almeta is expendable. All runproof, stooping things are blameable. If Reinhard is stooping then Reinhard is runproof. If Reinhard is runproof and Reinhard is blameable then Reinhard is amerindic. If Valene is amerindic and Valene is expendable then Valene is audile. All runproof things are audile. Furry, audile things are expendable. Almeta is blue.", "logic": "\nStooping(reinhard)\nBlameable(griffith)\nStooping(griffith)\nRunproof(valene)\nAmerindic(valene)\nExpendable(valene)\nStooping(almeta)\nRunproof(almeta)\nAmerindic(almeta)\nExpendable(almeta)\nforall x (Runproof(x) and Stooping(x) -> Blameable(x))\nStooping(reinhard) -> Runproof(reinhard)\nRunproof(reinhard) and Blameable(reinhard) -> Amerindic(reinhard)\nAmerindic(valene) and Expendable(valene) -> Audile(valene)\nforall x (Runproof(x) -> Audile(x))\nforall x (Blameable(x) and Audile(x) -> Expendable(x))\n\nBlue(almeta)\n\nBlue(almeta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1678"} {"premises": "The shelia ration the billie. The billie is tortious. If something ration the billie then the billie fondle the shelia. If something fondle the billie then the billie does not like the shelia. If the billie is moist then the billie is sunstruck. If the billie decorate the shelia then the shelia is not amharic. If the billie fondle the shelia then the billie ration the shelia. If something fondle the shelia and it ration the shelia then the shelia is not homeless. If the billie ration the shelia and the shelia does not need the billie then the shelia does not like the billie. If something fondle the shelia then it is homeless. The billie is tortious.", "logic": "\nRation(shelia, billie)\nTortious(billie)\nforall x (Ration(x, billie) -> Fondle(billie, shelia))\nforall x (Fondle(x, billie) -> not Fondle(billie, shelia))\nMoist(billie) -> Sunstruck(billie)\nDecorate(billie, shelia) -> not Amharic(shelia)\nFondle(billie, shelia) -> Ration(billie, shelia)\nforall x (Fondle(x, shelia) and Ration(x, shelia) -> not Homeless(shelia))\nRation(billie, shelia) and not Ration(shelia, billie) -> not Fondle(shelia, billie)\nforall x (Fondle(x, shelia) -> Homeless(x))\n\nTortious(billie)\n\ntherefore Tortious(billie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The nonna obstipate the maryl. The maryl is godlike. If something obstipate the maryl then the maryl syllabize the nonna. If something syllabize the maryl then the maryl does not like the nonna. If the maryl is advective then the maryl is polyatomic. If the maryl confront the nonna then the nonna is not reflexed. If the maryl syllabize the nonna then the maryl obstipate the nonna. If something syllabize the nonna and it obstipate the nonna then the nonna is not unthawed. If the maryl obstipate the nonna and the nonna does not need the maryl then the nonna does not like the maryl. If something syllabize the nonna then it is unthawed. The maryl is not godlike.", "logic": "\nObstipate(nonna, maryl)\nGodlike(maryl)\nforall x (Obstipate(x, maryl) -> Syllabize(maryl, nonna))\nforall x (Syllabize(x, maryl) -> not Syllabize(maryl, nonna))\nAdvective(maryl) -> Polyatomic(maryl)\nConfront(maryl, nonna) -> not Reflexed(nonna)\nSyllabize(maryl, nonna) -> Obstipate(maryl, nonna)\nforall x (Syllabize(x, nonna) and Obstipate(x, nonna) -> not Unthawed(nonna))\nObstipate(maryl, nonna) and not Obstipate(nonna, maryl) -> not Syllabize(nonna, maryl)\nforall x (Syllabize(x, nonna) -> Unthawed(x))\n\nnot Godlike(maryl)\n\ntherefore Godlike(maryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The cammie cook the lindy. The lindy is certain. If something cook the lindy then the lindy broadside the cammie. If something broadside the lindy then the lindy does not like the cammie. If the lindy is washable then the lindy is subsidised. If the lindy panic the cammie then the cammie is not carnassial. If the lindy broadside the cammie then the lindy cook the cammie. If something broadside the cammie and it cook the cammie then the cammie is not erosive. If the lindy cook the cammie and the cammie does not need the lindy then the cammie does not like the lindy. If something broadside the cammie then it is erosive. The lindy broadside the cammie.", "logic": "\nCook(cammie, lindy)\nCertain(lindy)\nforall x (Cook(x, lindy) -> Broadside(lindy, cammie))\nforall x (Broadside(x, lindy) -> not Broadside(lindy, cammie))\nWashable(lindy) -> Subsidised(lindy)\nPanic(lindy, cammie) -> not Carnassial(cammie)\nBroadside(lindy, cammie) -> Cook(lindy, cammie)\nforall x (Broadside(x, cammie) and Cook(x, cammie) -> not Erosive(cammie))\nCook(lindy, cammie) and not Cook(cammie, lindy) -> not Broadside(cammie, lindy)\nforall x (Broadside(x, cammie) -> Erosive(x))\n\nBroadside(lindy, cammie)\n\nCook(cammie, lindy) and forall x (Cook(x, lindy) -> Broadside(lindy, cammie)) -> therefore Broadside(lindy, cammie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The corinne carp the briana. The briana is ripping. If something carp the briana then the briana breastfeed the corinne. If something breastfeed the briana then the briana does not like the corinne. If the briana is dualistic then the briana is repulsive. If the briana awake the corinne then the corinne is not chechen. If the briana breastfeed the corinne then the briana carp the corinne. If something breastfeed the corinne and it carp the corinne then the corinne is not unisex. If the briana carp the corinne and the corinne does not need the briana then the corinne does not like the briana. If something breastfeed the corinne then it is unisex. The briana does not like the corinne.", "logic": "\nCarp(corinne, briana)\nRipping(briana)\nforall x (Carp(x, briana) -> Breastfeed(briana, corinne))\nforall x (Breastfeed(x, briana) -> not Breastfeed(briana, corinne))\nDualistic(briana) -> Repulsive(briana)\nAwake(briana, corinne) -> not Chechen(corinne)\nBreastfeed(briana, corinne) -> Carp(briana, corinne)\nforall x (Breastfeed(x, corinne) and Carp(x, corinne) -> not Unisex(corinne))\nCarp(briana, corinne) and not Carp(corinne, briana) -> not Breastfeed(corinne, briana)\nforall x (Breastfeed(x, corinne) -> Unisex(x))\n\nnot Breastfeed(briana, corinne)\n\nCarp(corinne, briana) and forall x (Carp(x, briana) -> Breastfeed(briana, corinne)) -> therefore Breastfeed(briana, corinne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The pam lallygag the kenneth. The kenneth is lawless. If something lallygag the kenneth then the kenneth notify the pam. If something notify the kenneth then the kenneth does not like the pam. If the kenneth is idyllic then the kenneth is tanned. If the kenneth outvie the pam then the pam is not masterful. If the kenneth notify the pam then the kenneth lallygag the pam. If something notify the pam and it lallygag the pam then the pam is not mucoidal. If the kenneth lallygag the pam and the pam does not need the kenneth then the pam does not like the kenneth. If something notify the pam then it is mucoidal. The kenneth is mucoidal.", "logic": "\nLallygag(pam, kenneth)\nLawless(kenneth)\nforall x (Lallygag(x, kenneth) -> Notify(kenneth, pam))\nforall x (Notify(x, kenneth) -> not Notify(kenneth, pam))\nIdyllic(kenneth) -> Tanned(kenneth)\nOutvie(kenneth, pam) -> not Masterful(pam)\nNotify(kenneth, pam) -> Lallygag(kenneth, pam)\nforall x (Notify(x, pam) and Lallygag(x, pam) -> not Mucoidal(pam))\nLallygag(kenneth, pam) and not Lallygag(pam, kenneth) -> not Notify(pam, kenneth)\nforall x (Notify(x, pam) -> Mucoidal(x))\n\nMucoidal(kenneth)\n\nLallygag(pam, kenneth) and forall x (Lallygag(x, kenneth) -> Notify(kenneth, pam)) -> therefore Notify(kenneth, pam) Notify(kenneth, pam) and forall x (Notify(x, pam) -> Mucoidal(x)) -> therefore Mucoidal(kenneth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The aristotle gluttonize the zahara. The zahara is spurious. If something gluttonize the zahara then the zahara stay the aristotle. If something stay the zahara then the zahara does not like the aristotle. If the zahara is amnesiac then the zahara is euclidean. If the zahara allure the aristotle then the aristotle is not horrid. If the zahara stay the aristotle then the zahara gluttonize the aristotle. If something stay the aristotle and it gluttonize the aristotle then the aristotle is not slack. If the zahara gluttonize the aristotle and the aristotle does not need the zahara then the aristotle does not like the zahara. If something stay the aristotle then it is slack. The zahara does not need the aristotle.", "logic": "\nGluttonize(aristotle, zahara)\nSpurious(zahara)\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, zahara) -> Stay(zahara, aristotle))\nforall x (Stay(x, zahara) -> not Stay(zahara, aristotle))\nAmnesiac(zahara) -> Euclidean(zahara)\nAllure(zahara, aristotle) -> not Horrid(aristotle)\nStay(zahara, aristotle) -> Gluttonize(zahara, aristotle)\nforall x (Stay(x, aristotle) and Gluttonize(x, aristotle) -> not Slack(aristotle))\nGluttonize(zahara, aristotle) and not Gluttonize(aristotle, zahara) -> not Stay(aristotle, zahara)\nforall x (Stay(x, aristotle) -> Slack(x))\n\nnot Gluttonize(zahara, aristotle)\n\nGluttonize(aristotle, zahara) and forall x (Gluttonize(x, zahara) -> Stay(zahara, aristotle)) -> therefore Stay(zahara, aristotle) Stay(zahara, aristotle) and Stay(zahara, aristotle) -> Gluttonize(zahara, aristotle) -> therefore Gluttonize(zahara, aristotle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The erl belt the juergen. The juergen is lukewarm. If something belt the juergen then the juergen meow the erl. If something meow the juergen then the juergen does not like the erl. If the juergen is conjoined then the juergen is modernised. If the juergen alkalinise the erl then the erl is not uncial. If the juergen meow the erl then the juergen belt the erl. If something meow the erl and it belt the erl then the erl is not bony. If the juergen belt the erl and the erl does not need the juergen then the erl does not like the juergen. If something meow the erl then it is bony. The erl is not bony.", "logic": "\nBelt(erl, juergen)\nLukewarm(juergen)\nforall x (Belt(x, juergen) -> Meow(juergen, erl))\nforall x (Meow(x, juergen) -> not Meow(juergen, erl))\nConjoined(juergen) -> Modernised(juergen)\nAlkalinise(juergen, erl) -> not Uncial(erl)\nMeow(juergen, erl) -> Belt(juergen, erl)\nforall x (Meow(x, erl) and Belt(x, erl) -> not Bony(erl))\nBelt(juergen, erl) and not Belt(erl, juergen) -> not Meow(erl, juergen)\nforall x (Meow(x, erl) -> Bony(x))\n\nnot Bony(erl)\n\nBelt(erl, juergen) and forall x (Belt(x, juergen) -> Meow(juergen, erl)) -> therefore Meow(juergen, erl) Belt(erl, juergen) and forall x (Belt(x, juergen) -> Meow(juergen, erl)) -> therefore Meow(juergen, erl) Meow(juergen, erl) and Meow(juergen, erl) -> Belt(juergen, erl) -> therefore Belt(juergen, erl) Meow(juergen, erl) and Belt(juergen, erl) and forall x (Meow(x, erl) and Belt(x, erl) -> not Bony(erl)) -> therefore not Bony(erl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The stearne aquaplane the karole. The karole is addible. If something aquaplane the karole then the karole abscond the stearne. If something abscond the karole then the karole does not like the stearne. If the karole is avestan then the karole is heavenly. If the karole room the stearne then the stearne is not handed. If the karole abscond the stearne then the karole aquaplane the stearne. If something abscond the stearne and it aquaplane the stearne then the stearne is not romish. If the karole aquaplane the stearne and the stearne does not need the karole then the stearne does not like the karole. If something abscond the stearne then it is romish. The stearne is romish.", "logic": "\nAquaplane(stearne, karole)\nAddible(karole)\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, karole) -> Abscond(karole, stearne))\nforall x (Abscond(x, karole) -> not Abscond(karole, stearne))\nAvestan(karole) -> Heavenly(karole)\nRoom(karole, stearne) -> not Handed(stearne)\nAbscond(karole, stearne) -> Aquaplane(karole, stearne)\nforall x (Abscond(x, stearne) and Aquaplane(x, stearne) -> not Romish(stearne))\nAquaplane(karole, stearne) and not Aquaplane(stearne, karole) -> not Abscond(stearne, karole)\nforall x (Abscond(x, stearne) -> Romish(x))\n\nRomish(stearne)\n\nAquaplane(stearne, karole) and forall x (Aquaplane(x, karole) -> Abscond(karole, stearne)) -> therefore Abscond(karole, stearne) Aquaplane(stearne, karole) and forall x (Aquaplane(x, karole) -> Abscond(karole, stearne)) -> therefore Abscond(karole, stearne) Abscond(karole, stearne) and Abscond(karole, stearne) -> Aquaplane(karole, stearne) -> therefore Aquaplane(karole, stearne) Abscond(karole, stearne) and Aquaplane(karole, stearne) and forall x (Abscond(x, stearne) and Aquaplane(x, stearne) -> not Romish(stearne)) -> therefore not Romish(stearne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The stefano mandate the kaylil. The kaylil is strapping. If something mandate the kaylil then the kaylil preen the stefano. If something preen the kaylil then the kaylil does not like the stefano. If the kaylil is liliaceous then the kaylil is decrepit. If the kaylil coinsure the stefano then the stefano is not fleshly. If the kaylil preen the stefano then the kaylil mandate the stefano. If something preen the stefano and it mandate the stefano then the stefano is not unsigned. If the kaylil mandate the stefano and the stefano does not need the kaylil then the stefano does not like the kaylil. If something preen the stefano then it is unsigned. The kaylil is not decrepit.", "logic": "\nMandate(stefano, kaylil)\nStrapping(kaylil)\nforall x (Mandate(x, kaylil) -> Preen(kaylil, stefano))\nforall x (Preen(x, kaylil) -> not Preen(kaylil, stefano))\nLiliaceous(kaylil) -> Decrepit(kaylil)\nCoinsure(kaylil, stefano) -> not Fleshly(stefano)\nPreen(kaylil, stefano) -> Mandate(kaylil, stefano)\nforall x (Preen(x, stefano) and Mandate(x, stefano) -> not Unsigned(stefano))\nMandate(kaylil, stefano) and not Mandate(stefano, kaylil) -> not Preen(stefano, kaylil)\nforall x (Preen(x, stefano) -> Unsigned(x))\n\nnot Decrepit(kaylil)\n\nLiliaceous(kaylil) -> Decrepit(kaylil) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The kordula thatch the minerva. The minerva is apolitical. If something thatch the minerva then the minerva chasten the kordula. If something chasten the minerva then the minerva does not like the kordula. If the minerva is affable then the minerva is quavering. If the minerva boldface the kordula then the kordula is not opencast. If the minerva chasten the kordula then the minerva thatch the kordula. If something chasten the kordula and it thatch the kordula then the kordula is not pleochroic. If the minerva thatch the kordula and the kordula does not need the minerva then the kordula does not like the minerva. If something chasten the kordula then it is pleochroic. The kordula is quavering.", "logic": "\nThatch(kordula, minerva)\nApolitical(minerva)\nforall x (Thatch(x, minerva) -> Chasten(minerva, kordula))\nforall x (Chasten(x, minerva) -> not Chasten(minerva, kordula))\nAffable(minerva) -> Quavering(minerva)\nBoldface(minerva, kordula) -> not Opencast(kordula)\nChasten(minerva, kordula) -> Thatch(minerva, kordula)\nforall x (Chasten(x, kordula) and Thatch(x, kordula) -> not Pleochroic(kordula))\nThatch(minerva, kordula) and not Thatch(kordula, minerva) -> not Chasten(kordula, minerva)\nforall x (Chasten(x, kordula) -> Pleochroic(x))\n\nQuavering(kordula)\n\nQuavering(kordula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The wald whomp the bentley. The bentley is censurable. If something whomp the bentley then the bentley train the wald. If something train the bentley then the bentley does not like the wald. If the bentley is unpainful then the bentley is wasted. If the bentley sailplane the wald then the wald is not unaccepted. If the bentley train the wald then the bentley whomp the wald. If something train the wald and it whomp the wald then the wald is not dilettante. If the bentley whomp the wald and the wald does not need the bentley then the wald does not like the bentley. If something train the wald then it is dilettante. The wald does not chase the wald.", "logic": "\nWhomp(wald, bentley)\nCensurable(bentley)\nforall x (Whomp(x, bentley) -> Train(bentley, wald))\nforall x (Train(x, bentley) -> not Train(bentley, wald))\nUnpainful(bentley) -> Wasted(bentley)\nSailplane(bentley, wald) -> not Unaccepted(wald)\nTrain(bentley, wald) -> Whomp(bentley, wald)\nforall x (Train(x, wald) and Whomp(x, wald) -> not Dilettante(wald))\nWhomp(bentley, wald) and not Whomp(wald, bentley) -> not Train(wald, bentley)\nforall x (Train(x, wald) -> Dilettante(x))\n\nnot Sailplane(wald, wald)\n\nnot Sailplane(wald, wald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The moe concretise the mauricio. The mauricio is isthmian. If something concretise the mauricio then the mauricio sideline the moe. If something sideline the mauricio then the mauricio does not like the moe. If the mauricio is effete then the mauricio is diabatic. If the mauricio exorcise the moe then the moe is not sprigged. If the mauricio sideline the moe then the mauricio concretise the moe. If something sideline the moe and it concretise the moe then the moe is not innocuous. If the mauricio concretise the moe and the moe does not need the mauricio then the moe does not like the mauricio. If something sideline the moe then it is innocuous. The moe concretise the moe.", "logic": "\nConcretise(moe, mauricio)\nIsthmian(mauricio)\nforall x (Concretise(x, mauricio) -> Sideline(mauricio, moe))\nforall x (Sideline(x, mauricio) -> not Sideline(mauricio, moe))\nEffete(mauricio) -> Diabatic(mauricio)\nExorcise(mauricio, moe) -> not Sprigged(moe)\nSideline(mauricio, moe) -> Concretise(mauricio, moe)\nforall x (Sideline(x, moe) and Concretise(x, moe) -> not Innocuous(moe))\nConcretise(mauricio, moe) and not Concretise(moe, mauricio) -> not Sideline(moe, mauricio)\nforall x (Sideline(x, moe) -> Innocuous(x))\n\nConcretise(moe, moe)\n\nConcretise(moe, moe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The teodorico drum the loreen. The loreen is high. If something drum the loreen then the loreen overprint the teodorico. If something overprint the loreen then the loreen does not like the teodorico. If the loreen is confiding then the loreen is xciv. If the loreen teetotal the teodorico then the teodorico is not texan. If the loreen overprint the teodorico then the loreen drum the teodorico. If something overprint the teodorico and it drum the teodorico then the teodorico is not peppy. If the loreen drum the teodorico and the teodorico does not need the loreen then the teodorico does not like the loreen. If something overprint the teodorico then it is peppy. The loreen does not like the loreen.", "logic": "\nDrum(teodorico, loreen)\nHigh(loreen)\nforall x (Drum(x, loreen) -> Overprint(loreen, teodorico))\nforall x (Overprint(x, loreen) -> not Overprint(loreen, teodorico))\nConfiding(loreen) -> Xciv(loreen)\nTeetotal(loreen, teodorico) -> not Texan(teodorico)\nOverprint(loreen, teodorico) -> Drum(loreen, teodorico)\nforall x (Overprint(x, teodorico) and Drum(x, teodorico) -> not Peppy(teodorico))\nDrum(loreen, teodorico) and not Drum(teodorico, loreen) -> not Overprint(teodorico, loreen)\nforall x (Overprint(x, teodorico) -> Peppy(x))\n\nnot Overprint(loreen, loreen)\n\nnot Overprint(loreen, loreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The roselia patinize the antonino. The antonino is nimble. If something patinize the antonino then the antonino rime the roselia. If something rime the antonino then the antonino does not like the roselia. If the antonino is jaundiced then the antonino is nitrous. If the antonino backspace the roselia then the roselia is not scentless. If the antonino rime the roselia then the antonino patinize the roselia. If something rime the roselia and it patinize the roselia then the roselia is not autoimmune. If the antonino patinize the roselia and the roselia does not need the antonino then the roselia does not like the antonino. If something rime the roselia then it is autoimmune. The roselia backspace the antonino.", "logic": "\nPatinize(roselia, antonino)\nNimble(antonino)\nforall x (Patinize(x, antonino) -> Rime(antonino, roselia))\nforall x (Rime(x, antonino) -> not Rime(antonino, roselia))\nJaundiced(antonino) -> Nitrous(antonino)\nBackspace(antonino, roselia) -> not Scentless(roselia)\nRime(antonino, roselia) -> Patinize(antonino, roselia)\nforall x (Rime(x, roselia) and Patinize(x, roselia) -> not Autoimmune(roselia))\nPatinize(antonino, roselia) and not Patinize(roselia, antonino) -> not Rime(roselia, antonino)\nforall x (Rime(x, roselia) -> Autoimmune(x))\n\nBackspace(roselia, antonino)\n\nBackspace(roselia, antonino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The henrik forget the emelyne. The emelyne is infectious. If something forget the emelyne then the emelyne swivel the henrik. If something swivel the emelyne then the emelyne does not like the henrik. If the emelyne is paroxysmal then the emelyne is colicky. If the emelyne serrate the henrik then the henrik is not scorched. If the emelyne swivel the henrik then the emelyne forget the henrik. If something swivel the henrik and it forget the henrik then the henrik is not adnate. If the emelyne forget the henrik and the henrik does not need the emelyne then the henrik does not like the emelyne. If something swivel the henrik then it is adnate. The emelyne does not need the emelyne.", "logic": "\nForget(henrik, emelyne)\nInfectious(emelyne)\nforall x (Forget(x, emelyne) -> Swivel(emelyne, henrik))\nforall x (Swivel(x, emelyne) -> not Swivel(emelyne, henrik))\nParoxysmal(emelyne) -> Colicky(emelyne)\nSerrate(emelyne, henrik) -> not Scorched(henrik)\nSwivel(emelyne, henrik) -> Forget(emelyne, henrik)\nforall x (Swivel(x, henrik) and Forget(x, henrik) -> not Adnate(henrik))\nForget(emelyne, henrik) and not Forget(henrik, emelyne) -> not Swivel(henrik, emelyne)\nforall x (Swivel(x, henrik) -> Adnate(x))\n\nnot Forget(emelyne, emelyne)\n\nnot Forget(emelyne, emelyne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The nancee furnish the chaim. The chaim is ablaze. If something furnish the chaim then the chaim scarf the nancee. If something scarf the chaim then the chaim does not like the nancee. If the chaim is duplicate then the chaim is unattached. If the chaim sphacelate the nancee then the nancee is not rare. If the chaim scarf the nancee then the chaim furnish the nancee. If something scarf the nancee and it furnish the nancee then the nancee is not boreal. If the chaim furnish the nancee and the nancee does not need the chaim then the nancee does not like the chaim. If something scarf the nancee then it is boreal. The nancee scarf the chaim.", "logic": "\nFurnish(nancee, chaim)\nAblaze(chaim)\nforall x (Furnish(x, chaim) -> Scarf(chaim, nancee))\nforall x (Scarf(x, chaim) -> not Scarf(chaim, nancee))\nDuplicate(chaim) -> Unattached(chaim)\nSphacelate(chaim, nancee) -> not Rare(nancee)\nScarf(chaim, nancee) -> Furnish(chaim, nancee)\nforall x (Scarf(x, nancee) and Furnish(x, nancee) -> not Boreal(nancee))\nFurnish(chaim, nancee) and not Furnish(nancee, chaim) -> not Scarf(nancee, chaim)\nforall x (Scarf(x, nancee) -> Boreal(x))\n\nScarf(nancee, chaim)\n\nScarf(nancee, chaim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "Dwaine is invading. Dwaine is regimented. Dwaine is lxii. All invariant, apposable things are invading. Dwaine is invading.", "logic": "\nInvading(dwaine)\nRegimented(dwaine)\nLxii(dwaine)\nforall x (Invariant(x) and Apposable(x) -> Invading(x))\n\nInvading(dwaine)\n\ntherefore Invading(dwaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3923"} {"premises": "Marcello is unlicensed. Marcello is stony. Marcello is buttoned. All beggarly, aligned things are unlicensed. Marcello is not unlicensed.", "logic": "\nUnlicensed(marcello)\nStony(marcello)\nButtoned(marcello)\nforall x (Beggarly(x) and Aligned(x) -> Unlicensed(x))\n\nnot Unlicensed(marcello)\n\ntherefore Unlicensed(marcello)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3923"} {"premises": "Norrie is ionized. Norrie is anomic. Norrie is crowned. All keyless, enduring things are ionized. Norrie is not rough.", "logic": "\nIonized(norrie)\nAnomic(norrie)\nCrowned(norrie)\nforall x (Keyless(x) and Enduring(x) -> Ionized(x))\n\nnot Rough(norrie)\n\nnot Rough(norrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3923"} {"premises": "Violante is unmoving. Violante is muhammadan. Violante is surficial. All cormous, wigless things are unmoving. Violante is wigless.", "logic": "\nUnmoving(violante)\nMuhammadan(violante)\nSurficial(violante)\nforall x (Cormous(x) and Wigless(x) -> Unmoving(x))\n\nWigless(violante)\n\nWigless(violante) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3923"} {"premises": "Shoshana is indwelling. Shoshana is involute. Shoshana is chatty. Christoph is swiss. Christoph is backstairs. Christoph is not national. Christoph is not chatty. Quiet people are not national. Young people are involute. All involute people are afflictive. If Christoph is chatty then Christoph is swiss. If Christoph is involute and Christoph is not indwelling then Christoph is national. If someone is national and afflictive then they are chatty. If someone is afflictive and not national then they are backstairs. If someone is afflictive and not national then they are backstairs. Christoph is swiss.", "logic": "\nIndwelling(shoshana)\nInvolute(shoshana)\nChatty(shoshana)\nSwiss(christoph)\nBackstairs(christoph)\nnot National(christoph)\nnot Chatty(christoph)\nforall x (Afflictive(x) -> not National(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Involute(x))\nforall x (Involute(x) -> Afflictive(x))\nChatty(christoph) -> Swiss(christoph)\nInvolute(christoph) and not Indwelling(christoph) -> National(christoph)\nforall x (National(x) and Afflictive(x) -> Chatty(x))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) and not National(x) -> Backstairs(x))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) and not National(x) -> Backstairs(x))\n\nSwiss(christoph)\n\ntherefore Swiss(christoph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Kelcey is saving. Kelcey is luxe. Kelcey is savorless. Danika is untoothed. Danika is loopy. Danika is not aerobiotic. Danika is not savorless. Quiet people are not aerobiotic. Young people are luxe. All luxe people are dextrorse. If Danika is savorless then Danika is untoothed. If Danika is luxe and Danika is not saving then Danika is aerobiotic. If someone is aerobiotic and dextrorse then they are savorless. If someone is dextrorse and not aerobiotic then they are loopy. If someone is dextrorse and not aerobiotic then they are loopy. Danika is savorless.", "logic": "\nSaving(kelcey)\nLuxe(kelcey)\nSavorless(kelcey)\nUntoothed(danika)\nLoopy(danika)\nnot Aerobiotic(danika)\nnot Savorless(danika)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> not Aerobiotic(x))\nforall x (Savorless(x) -> Luxe(x))\nforall x (Luxe(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\nSavorless(danika) -> Untoothed(danika)\nLuxe(danika) and not Saving(danika) -> Aerobiotic(danika)\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) and Dextrorse(x) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and not Aerobiotic(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and not Aerobiotic(x) -> Loopy(x))\n\nSavorless(danika)\n\ntherefore not Savorless(danika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Phyllida is peculiar. Phyllida is likeable. Phyllida is scarey. Martelle is rubbishy. Martelle is racy. Martelle is not cheerless. Martelle is not scarey. Quiet people are not cheerless. Young people are likeable. All likeable people are prandial. If Martelle is scarey then Martelle is rubbishy. If Martelle is likeable and Martelle is not peculiar then Martelle is cheerless. If someone is cheerless and prandial then they are scarey. If someone is prandial and not cheerless then they are racy. If someone is prandial and not cheerless then they are racy. Phyllida is prandial.", "logic": "\nPeculiar(phyllida)\nLikeable(phyllida)\nScarey(phyllida)\nRubbishy(martelle)\nRacy(martelle)\nnot Cheerless(martelle)\nnot Scarey(martelle)\nforall x (Prandial(x) -> not Cheerless(x))\nforall x (Scarey(x) -> Likeable(x))\nforall x (Likeable(x) -> Prandial(x))\nScarey(martelle) -> Rubbishy(martelle)\nLikeable(martelle) and not Peculiar(martelle) -> Cheerless(martelle)\nforall x (Cheerless(x) and Prandial(x) -> Scarey(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) and not Cheerless(x) -> Racy(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) and not Cheerless(x) -> Racy(x))\n\nPrandial(phyllida)\n\nLikeable(phyllida) and forall x (Likeable(x) -> Prandial(x)) -> therefore Prandial(phyllida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Dot is arcuate. Dot is vivace. Dot is ulcerous. Izabel is prideful. Izabel is calcuttan. Izabel is not puff. Izabel is not ulcerous. Quiet people are not puff. Young people are vivace. All vivace people are poltroon. If Izabel is ulcerous then Izabel is prideful. If Izabel is vivace and Izabel is not arcuate then Izabel is puff. If someone is puff and poltroon then they are ulcerous. If someone is poltroon and not puff then they are calcuttan. If someone is poltroon and not puff then they are calcuttan. Dot is not poltroon.", "logic": "\nArcuate(dot)\nVivace(dot)\nUlcerous(dot)\nPrideful(izabel)\nCalcuttan(izabel)\nnot Puff(izabel)\nnot Ulcerous(izabel)\nforall x (Poltroon(x) -> not Puff(x))\nforall x (Ulcerous(x) -> Vivace(x))\nforall x (Vivace(x) -> Poltroon(x))\nUlcerous(izabel) -> Prideful(izabel)\nVivace(izabel) and not Arcuate(izabel) -> Puff(izabel)\nforall x (Puff(x) and Poltroon(x) -> Ulcerous(x))\nforall x (Poltroon(x) and not Puff(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Poltroon(x) and not Puff(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\n\nnot Poltroon(dot)\n\nVivace(dot) and forall x (Vivace(x) -> Poltroon(x)) -> therefore Poltroon(dot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Katuscha is curricular. Katuscha is luckless. Katuscha is stylised. Bennie is styptic. Bennie is hammered. Bennie is not whipping. Bennie is not stylised. Quiet people are not whipping. Young people are luckless. All luckless people are anisogamic. If Bennie is stylised then Bennie is styptic. If Bennie is luckless and Bennie is not curricular then Bennie is whipping. If someone is whipping and anisogamic then they are stylised. If someone is anisogamic and not whipping then they are hammered. If someone is anisogamic and not whipping then they are hammered. Katuscha is not whipping.", "logic": "\nCurricular(katuscha)\nLuckless(katuscha)\nStylised(katuscha)\nStyptic(bennie)\nHammered(bennie)\nnot Whipping(bennie)\nnot Stylised(bennie)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) -> not Whipping(x))\nforall x (Stylised(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Luckless(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nStylised(bennie) -> Styptic(bennie)\nLuckless(bennie) and not Curricular(bennie) -> Whipping(bennie)\nforall x (Whipping(x) and Anisogamic(x) -> Stylised(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and not Whipping(x) -> Hammered(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and not Whipping(x) -> Hammered(x))\n\nnot Whipping(katuscha)\n\nLuckless(katuscha) and forall x (Luckless(x) -> Anisogamic(x)) -> therefore Anisogamic(katuscha) Anisogamic(katuscha) and forall x (Anisogamic(x) -> not Whipping(x)) -> therefore not Whipping(katuscha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Oralia is meandering. Oralia is uninformed. Oralia is brumal. Orville is cracked. Orville is swazi. Orville is not ruthless. Orville is not brumal. Quiet people are not ruthless. Young people are uninformed. All uninformed people are grating. If Orville is brumal then Orville is cracked. If Orville is uninformed and Orville is not meandering then Orville is ruthless. If someone is ruthless and grating then they are brumal. If someone is grating and not ruthless then they are swazi. If someone is grating and not ruthless then they are swazi. Oralia is ruthless.", "logic": "\nMeandering(oralia)\nUninformed(oralia)\nBrumal(oralia)\nCracked(orville)\nSwazi(orville)\nnot Ruthless(orville)\nnot Brumal(orville)\nforall x (Grating(x) -> not Ruthless(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Uninformed(x))\nforall x (Uninformed(x) -> Grating(x))\nBrumal(orville) -> Cracked(orville)\nUninformed(orville) and not Meandering(orville) -> Ruthless(orville)\nforall x (Ruthless(x) and Grating(x) -> Brumal(x))\nforall x (Grating(x) and not Ruthless(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Grating(x) and not Ruthless(x) -> Swazi(x))\n\nRuthless(oralia)\n\nUninformed(oralia) and forall x (Uninformed(x) -> Grating(x)) -> therefore Grating(oralia) Grating(oralia) and forall x (Grating(x) -> not Ruthless(x)) -> therefore not Ruthless(oralia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Nico is biannual. Nico is peaked. Nico is downright. Kettie is nonskid. Kettie is pasted. Kettie is not alkylic. Kettie is not downright. Quiet people are not alkylic. Young people are peaked. All peaked people are xxxii. If Kettie is downright then Kettie is nonskid. If Kettie is peaked and Kettie is not biannual then Kettie is alkylic. If someone is alkylic and xxxii then they are downright. If someone is xxxii and not alkylic then they are pasted. If someone is xxxii and not alkylic then they are pasted. Nico is pasted.", "logic": "\nBiannual(nico)\nPeaked(nico)\nDownright(nico)\nNonskid(kettie)\nPasted(kettie)\nnot Alkylic(kettie)\nnot Downright(kettie)\nforall x (Xxxii(x) -> not Alkylic(x))\nforall x (Downright(x) -> Peaked(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) -> Xxxii(x))\nDownright(kettie) -> Nonskid(kettie)\nPeaked(kettie) and not Biannual(kettie) -> Alkylic(kettie)\nforall x (Alkylic(x) and Xxxii(x) -> Downright(x))\nforall x (Xxxii(x) and not Alkylic(x) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Xxxii(x) and not Alkylic(x) -> Pasted(x))\n\nPasted(nico)\n\nPeaked(nico) and forall x (Peaked(x) -> Xxxii(x)) -> therefore Xxxii(nico) Peaked(nico) and forall x (Peaked(x) -> Xxxii(x)) -> therefore Xxxii(nico) Xxxii(nico) and forall x (Xxxii(x) -> not Alkylic(x)) -> therefore not Alkylic(nico) Xxxii(nico) and not Alkylic(nico) and forall x (Xxxii(x) and not Alkylic(x) -> Pasted(x)) -> therefore Pasted(nico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Nicoline is exaugural. Nicoline is drumhead. Nicoline is unstained. Mina is staged. Mina is impatient. Mina is not viral. Mina is not unstained. Quiet people are not viral. Young people are drumhead. All drumhead people are relentless. If Mina is unstained then Mina is staged. If Mina is drumhead and Mina is not exaugural then Mina is viral. If someone is viral and relentless then they are unstained. If someone is relentless and not viral then they are impatient. If someone is relentless and not viral then they are impatient. Nicoline is not impatient.", "logic": "\nExaugural(nicoline)\nDrumhead(nicoline)\nUnstained(nicoline)\nStaged(mina)\nImpatient(mina)\nnot Viral(mina)\nnot Unstained(mina)\nforall x (Relentless(x) -> not Viral(x))\nforall x (Unstained(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) -> Relentless(x))\nUnstained(mina) -> Staged(mina)\nDrumhead(mina) and not Exaugural(mina) -> Viral(mina)\nforall x (Viral(x) and Relentless(x) -> Unstained(x))\nforall x (Relentless(x) and not Viral(x) -> Impatient(x))\nforall x (Relentless(x) and not Viral(x) -> Impatient(x))\n\nnot Impatient(nicoline)\n\nDrumhead(nicoline) and forall x (Drumhead(x) -> Relentless(x)) -> therefore Relentless(nicoline) Drumhead(nicoline) and forall x (Drumhead(x) -> Relentless(x)) -> therefore Relentless(nicoline) Relentless(nicoline) and forall x (Relentless(x) -> not Viral(x)) -> therefore not Viral(nicoline) Relentless(nicoline) and not Viral(nicoline) and forall x (Relentless(x) and not Viral(x) -> Impatient(x)) -> therefore Impatient(nicoline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Allis is littoral. Allis is rationed. Allis is fazed. Rhody is satiated. Rhody is undersize. Rhody is not spurned. Rhody is not fazed. Quiet people are not spurned. Young people are rationed. All rationed people are unweaned. If Rhody is fazed then Rhody is satiated. If Rhody is rationed and Rhody is not littoral then Rhody is spurned. If someone is spurned and unweaned then they are fazed. If someone is unweaned and not spurned then they are undersize. If someone is unweaned and not spurned then they are undersize. Rhody is not rationed.", "logic": "\nLittoral(allis)\nRationed(allis)\nFazed(allis)\nSatiated(rhody)\nUndersize(rhody)\nnot Spurned(rhody)\nnot Fazed(rhody)\nforall x (Unweaned(x) -> not Spurned(x))\nforall x (Fazed(x) -> Rationed(x))\nforall x (Rationed(x) -> Unweaned(x))\nFazed(rhody) -> Satiated(rhody)\nRationed(rhody) and not Littoral(rhody) -> Spurned(rhody)\nforall x (Spurned(x) and Unweaned(x) -> Fazed(x))\nforall x (Unweaned(x) and not Spurned(x) -> Undersize(x))\nforall x (Unweaned(x) and not Spurned(x) -> Undersize(x))\n\nnot Rationed(rhody)\n\nforall x (Fazed(x) -> Rationed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Zolly is diffusive. Zolly is morganatic. Zolly is tenebrous. Salman is oneiric. Salman is developing. Salman is not world. Salman is not tenebrous. Quiet people are not world. Young people are morganatic. All morganatic people are painless. If Salman is tenebrous then Salman is oneiric. If Salman is morganatic and Salman is not diffusive then Salman is world. If someone is world and painless then they are tenebrous. If someone is painless and not world then they are developing. If someone is painless and not world then they are developing. Salman is painless.", "logic": "\nDiffusive(zolly)\nMorganatic(zolly)\nTenebrous(zolly)\nOneiric(salman)\nDeveloping(salman)\nnot World(salman)\nnot Tenebrous(salman)\nforall x (Painless(x) -> not World(x))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Morganatic(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) -> Painless(x))\nTenebrous(salman) -> Oneiric(salman)\nMorganatic(salman) and not Diffusive(salman) -> World(salman)\nforall x (World(x) and Painless(x) -> Tenebrous(x))\nforall x (Painless(x) and not World(x) -> Developing(x))\nforall x (Painless(x) and not World(x) -> Developing(x))\n\nPainless(salman)\n\nforall x (Morganatic(x) -> Painless(x)) <- forall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Morganatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Yolande is feudal. Yolande is hapless. Yolande is duncish. Zeus is hircine. Zeus is eroded. Zeus is not mansard. Zeus is not duncish. Quiet people are not mansard. Young people are hapless. All hapless people are madcap. If Zeus is duncish then Zeus is hircine. If Zeus is hapless and Zeus is not feudal then Zeus is mansard. If someone is mansard and madcap then they are duncish. If someone is madcap and not mansard then they are eroded. If someone is madcap and not mansard then they are eroded. Zeus is not feudal.", "logic": "\nFeudal(yolande)\nHapless(yolande)\nDuncish(yolande)\nHircine(zeus)\nEroded(zeus)\nnot Mansard(zeus)\nnot Duncish(zeus)\nforall x (Madcap(x) -> not Mansard(x))\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> Hapless(x))\nforall x (Hapless(x) -> Madcap(x))\nDuncish(zeus) -> Hircine(zeus)\nHapless(zeus) and not Feudal(zeus) -> Mansard(zeus)\nforall x (Mansard(x) and Madcap(x) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Madcap(x) and not Mansard(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Madcap(x) and not Mansard(x) -> Eroded(x))\n\nnot Feudal(zeus)\n\nnot Feudal(zeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Inigo is snobbish. Inigo is tegular. Inigo is arenaceous. Ishmael is unstrung. Ishmael is cambial. Ishmael is not mesophytic. Ishmael is not arenaceous. Quiet people are not mesophytic. Young people are tegular. All tegular people are pushy. If Ishmael is arenaceous then Ishmael is unstrung. If Ishmael is tegular and Ishmael is not snobbish then Ishmael is mesophytic. If someone is mesophytic and pushy then they are arenaceous. If someone is pushy and not mesophytic then they are cambial. If someone is pushy and not mesophytic then they are cambial. Inigo is unstrung.", "logic": "\nSnobbish(inigo)\nTegular(inigo)\nArenaceous(inigo)\nUnstrung(ishmael)\nCambial(ishmael)\nnot Mesophytic(ishmael)\nnot Arenaceous(ishmael)\nforall x (Pushy(x) -> not Mesophytic(x))\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) -> Tegular(x))\nforall x (Tegular(x) -> Pushy(x))\nArenaceous(ishmael) -> Unstrung(ishmael)\nTegular(ishmael) and not Snobbish(ishmael) -> Mesophytic(ishmael)\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) and Pushy(x) -> Arenaceous(x))\nforall x (Pushy(x) and not Mesophytic(x) -> Cambial(x))\nforall x (Pushy(x) and not Mesophytic(x) -> Cambial(x))\n\nUnstrung(inigo)\n\nUnstrung(inigo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "Dyan is delicious. Manish is pyloric. Manish is indurate. Manish is topping. Manish is absent. Christen is pyloric. Christen is delicious. Christen is agronomic. Christen is indurate. Christen is topping. Christen is localized. Christen is absent. Luelle is pyloric. Luelle is agronomic. Luelle is absent. If Christen is localized then Christen is absent. If Luelle is absent then Luelle is agronomic. All topping, pyloric things are agronomic. All indurate things are localized. All indurate, absent things are localized. Rough, absent things are indurate. If something is pyloric then it is topping. If Christen is absent and Christen is indurate then Christen is pyloric. Christen is indurate.", "logic": "\nDelicious(dyan)\nPyloric(manish)\nIndurate(manish)\nTopping(manish)\nAbsent(manish)\nPyloric(christen)\nDelicious(christen)\nAgronomic(christen)\nIndurate(christen)\nTopping(christen)\nLocalized(christen)\nAbsent(christen)\nPyloric(luelle)\nAgronomic(luelle)\nAbsent(luelle)\nLocalized(christen) -> Absent(christen)\nAbsent(luelle) -> Agronomic(luelle)\nforall x (Topping(x) and Pyloric(x) -> Agronomic(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Absent(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Topping(x) and Absent(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Pyloric(x) -> Topping(x))\nAbsent(christen) and Indurate(christen) -> Pyloric(christen)\n\nIndurate(christen)\n\ntherefore Indurate(christen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Roni is activated. Kimberlee is puffed. Kimberlee is triploid. Kimberlee is relaxed. Kimberlee is objective. Zack is puffed. Zack is activated. Zack is baked. Zack is triploid. Zack is relaxed. Zack is hemophilic. Zack is objective. Caritta is puffed. Caritta is baked. Caritta is objective. If Zack is hemophilic then Zack is objective. If Caritta is objective then Caritta is baked. All relaxed, puffed things are baked. All triploid things are hemophilic. All triploid, objective things are hemophilic. Rough, objective things are triploid. If something is puffed then it is relaxed. If Zack is objective and Zack is triploid then Zack is puffed. Caritta is not puffed.", "logic": "\nActivated(roni)\nPuffed(kimberlee)\nTriploid(kimberlee)\nRelaxed(kimberlee)\nObjective(kimberlee)\nPuffed(zack)\nActivated(zack)\nBaked(zack)\nTriploid(zack)\nRelaxed(zack)\nHemophilic(zack)\nObjective(zack)\nPuffed(caritta)\nBaked(caritta)\nObjective(caritta)\nHemophilic(zack) -> Objective(zack)\nObjective(caritta) -> Baked(caritta)\nforall x (Relaxed(x) and Puffed(x) -> Baked(x))\nforall x (Triploid(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Triploid(x) and Objective(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Relaxed(x) and Objective(x) -> Triploid(x))\nforall x (Puffed(x) -> Relaxed(x))\nObjective(zack) and Triploid(zack) -> Puffed(zack)\n\nnot Puffed(caritta)\n\ntherefore Puffed(caritta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Alexine is unbowed. Candra is towheaded. Candra is arabic. Candra is exact. Candra is bengali. Lorette is towheaded. Lorette is unbowed. Lorette is candescent. Lorette is arabic. Lorette is exact. Lorette is merciful. Lorette is bengali. Mabel is towheaded. Mabel is candescent. Mabel is bengali. If Lorette is merciful then Lorette is bengali. If Mabel is bengali then Mabel is candescent. All exact, towheaded things are candescent. All arabic things are merciful. All arabic, bengali things are merciful. Rough, bengali things are arabic. If something is towheaded then it is exact. If Lorette is bengali and Lorette is arabic then Lorette is towheaded. Candra is merciful.", "logic": "\nUnbowed(alexine)\nTowheaded(candra)\nArabic(candra)\nExact(candra)\nBengali(candra)\nTowheaded(lorette)\nUnbowed(lorette)\nCandescent(lorette)\nArabic(lorette)\nExact(lorette)\nMerciful(lorette)\nBengali(lorette)\nTowheaded(mabel)\nCandescent(mabel)\nBengali(mabel)\nMerciful(lorette) -> Bengali(lorette)\nBengali(mabel) -> Candescent(mabel)\nforall x (Exact(x) and Towheaded(x) -> Candescent(x))\nforall x (Arabic(x) -> Merciful(x))\nforall x (Arabic(x) and Bengali(x) -> Merciful(x))\nforall x (Exact(x) and Bengali(x) -> Arabic(x))\nforall x (Towheaded(x) -> Exact(x))\nBengali(lorette) and Arabic(lorette) -> Towheaded(lorette)\n\nMerciful(candra)\n\nArabic(candra) and forall x (Arabic(x) -> Merciful(x)) -> therefore Merciful(candra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Lauryn is ebon. Corry is fascistic. Corry is coral. Corry is chic. Corry is triassic. Larry is fascistic. Larry is ebon. Larry is truncate. Larry is coral. Larry is chic. Larry is nervous. Larry is triassic. Hilbert is fascistic. Hilbert is truncate. Hilbert is triassic. If Larry is nervous then Larry is triassic. If Hilbert is triassic then Hilbert is truncate. All chic, fascistic things are truncate. All coral things are nervous. All coral, triassic things are nervous. Rough, triassic things are coral. If something is fascistic then it is chic. If Larry is triassic and Larry is coral then Larry is fascistic. Corry is not nervous.", "logic": "\nEbon(lauryn)\nFascistic(corry)\nCoral(corry)\nChic(corry)\nTriassic(corry)\nFascistic(larry)\nEbon(larry)\nTruncate(larry)\nCoral(larry)\nChic(larry)\nNervous(larry)\nTriassic(larry)\nFascistic(hilbert)\nTruncate(hilbert)\nTriassic(hilbert)\nNervous(larry) -> Triassic(larry)\nTriassic(hilbert) -> Truncate(hilbert)\nforall x (Chic(x) and Fascistic(x) -> Truncate(x))\nforall x (Coral(x) -> Nervous(x))\nforall x (Coral(x) and Triassic(x) -> Nervous(x))\nforall x (Chic(x) and Triassic(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Fascistic(x) -> Chic(x))\nTriassic(larry) and Coral(larry) -> Fascistic(larry)\n\nnot Nervous(corry)\n\nCoral(corry) and forall x (Coral(x) -> Nervous(x)) -> therefore Nervous(corry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Haywood is protrusive. Joyan is mancunian. Joyan is biaural. Joyan is flowered. Joyan is nacreous. Appolonia is mancunian. Appolonia is protrusive. Appolonia is third. Appolonia is biaural. Appolonia is flowered. Appolonia is discalced. Appolonia is nacreous. Crissy is mancunian. Crissy is third. Crissy is nacreous. If Appolonia is discalced then Appolonia is nacreous. If Crissy is nacreous then Crissy is third. All flowered, mancunian things are third. All biaural things are discalced. All biaural, nacreous things are discalced. Rough, nacreous things are biaural. If something is mancunian then it is flowered. If Appolonia is nacreous and Appolonia is biaural then Appolonia is mancunian. Crissy is biaural.", "logic": "\nProtrusive(haywood)\nMancunian(joyan)\nBiaural(joyan)\nFlowered(joyan)\nNacreous(joyan)\nMancunian(appolonia)\nProtrusive(appolonia)\nThird(appolonia)\nBiaural(appolonia)\nFlowered(appolonia)\nDiscalced(appolonia)\nNacreous(appolonia)\nMancunian(crissy)\nThird(crissy)\nNacreous(crissy)\nDiscalced(appolonia) -> Nacreous(appolonia)\nNacreous(crissy) -> Third(crissy)\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Mancunian(x) -> Third(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) and Nacreous(x) -> Discalced(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Nacreous(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (Mancunian(x) -> Flowered(x))\nNacreous(appolonia) and Biaural(appolonia) -> Mancunian(appolonia)\n\nBiaural(crissy)\n\nMancunian(crissy) and forall x (Mancunian(x) -> Flowered(x)) -> therefore Flowered(crissy) Flowered(crissy) and Nacreous(crissy) and forall x (Flowered(x) and Nacreous(x) -> Biaural(x)) -> therefore Biaural(crissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Elroy is attrited. Vince is incorrect. Vince is indebted. Vince is shorthand. Vince is earthen. Rodrigo is incorrect. Rodrigo is attrited. Rodrigo is kindly. Rodrigo is indebted. Rodrigo is shorthand. Rodrigo is elliptical. Rodrigo is earthen. Odin is incorrect. Odin is kindly. Odin is earthen. If Rodrigo is elliptical then Rodrigo is earthen. If Odin is earthen then Odin is kindly. All shorthand, incorrect things are kindly. All indebted things are elliptical. All indebted, earthen things are elliptical. Rough, earthen things are indebted. If something is incorrect then it is shorthand. If Rodrigo is earthen and Rodrigo is indebted then Rodrigo is incorrect. Odin is not indebted.", "logic": "\nAttrited(elroy)\nIncorrect(vince)\nIndebted(vince)\nShorthand(vince)\nEarthen(vince)\nIncorrect(rodrigo)\nAttrited(rodrigo)\nKindly(rodrigo)\nIndebted(rodrigo)\nShorthand(rodrigo)\nElliptical(rodrigo)\nEarthen(rodrigo)\nIncorrect(odin)\nKindly(odin)\nEarthen(odin)\nElliptical(rodrigo) -> Earthen(rodrigo)\nEarthen(odin) -> Kindly(odin)\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Incorrect(x) -> Kindly(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) -> Elliptical(x))\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Earthen(x) -> Elliptical(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Earthen(x) -> Indebted(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nEarthen(rodrigo) and Indebted(rodrigo) -> Incorrect(rodrigo)\n\nnot Indebted(odin)\n\nIncorrect(odin) and forall x (Incorrect(x) -> Shorthand(x)) -> therefore Shorthand(odin) Shorthand(odin) and Earthen(odin) and forall x (Shorthand(x) and Earthen(x) -> Indebted(x)) -> therefore Indebted(odin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Ingaberg is subgross. Abigael is unbroken. Abigael is agleam. Abigael is rueful. Abigael is fringed. Nealon is unbroken. Nealon is subgross. Nealon is salivary. Nealon is agleam. Nealon is rueful. Nealon is squalling. Nealon is fringed. Fredi is unbroken. Fredi is salivary. Fredi is fringed. If Nealon is squalling then Nealon is fringed. If Fredi is fringed then Fredi is salivary. All rueful, unbroken things are salivary. All agleam things are squalling. All agleam, fringed things are squalling. Rough, fringed things are agleam. If something is unbroken then it is rueful. If Nealon is fringed and Nealon is agleam then Nealon is unbroken. Fredi is squalling.", "logic": "\nSubgross(ingaberg)\nUnbroken(abigael)\nAgleam(abigael)\nRueful(abigael)\nFringed(abigael)\nUnbroken(nealon)\nSubgross(nealon)\nSalivary(nealon)\nAgleam(nealon)\nRueful(nealon)\nSqualling(nealon)\nFringed(nealon)\nUnbroken(fredi)\nSalivary(fredi)\nFringed(fredi)\nSqualling(nealon) -> Fringed(nealon)\nFringed(fredi) -> Salivary(fredi)\nforall x (Rueful(x) and Unbroken(x) -> Salivary(x))\nforall x (Agleam(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Agleam(x) and Fringed(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Rueful(x) and Fringed(x) -> Agleam(x))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) -> Rueful(x))\nFringed(nealon) and Agleam(nealon) -> Unbroken(nealon)\n\nSqualling(fredi)\n\nUnbroken(fredi) and forall x (Unbroken(x) -> Rueful(x)) -> therefore Rueful(fredi) Rueful(fredi) and Fringed(fredi) and forall x (Rueful(x) and Fringed(x) -> Agleam(x)) -> therefore Agleam(fredi) Agleam(fredi) and forall x (Agleam(x) -> Squalling(x)) -> therefore Squalling(fredi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Collie is addled. Maude is unironed. Maude is parturient. Maude is gilbertian. Maude is cacophonic. Teena is unironed. Teena is addled. Teena is jilted. Teena is parturient. Teena is gilbertian. Teena is midmost. Teena is cacophonic. Joana is unironed. Joana is jilted. Joana is cacophonic. If Teena is midmost then Teena is cacophonic. If Joana is cacophonic then Joana is jilted. All gilbertian, unironed things are jilted. All parturient things are midmost. All parturient, cacophonic things are midmost. Rough, cacophonic things are parturient. If something is unironed then it is gilbertian. If Teena is cacophonic and Teena is parturient then Teena is unironed. Joana is not midmost.", "logic": "\nAddled(collie)\nUnironed(maude)\nParturient(maude)\nGilbertian(maude)\nCacophonic(maude)\nUnironed(teena)\nAddled(teena)\nJilted(teena)\nParturient(teena)\nGilbertian(teena)\nMidmost(teena)\nCacophonic(teena)\nUnironed(joana)\nJilted(joana)\nCacophonic(joana)\nMidmost(teena) -> Cacophonic(teena)\nCacophonic(joana) -> Jilted(joana)\nforall x (Gilbertian(x) and Unironed(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) and Cacophonic(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Gilbertian(x) and Cacophonic(x) -> Parturient(x))\nforall x (Unironed(x) -> Gilbertian(x))\nCacophonic(teena) and Parturient(teena) -> Unironed(teena)\n\nnot Midmost(joana)\n\nUnironed(joana) and forall x (Unironed(x) -> Gilbertian(x)) -> therefore Gilbertian(joana) Gilbertian(joana) and Cacophonic(joana) and forall x (Gilbertian(x) and Cacophonic(x) -> Parturient(x)) -> therefore Parturient(joana) Parturient(joana) and forall x (Parturient(x) -> Midmost(x)) -> therefore Midmost(joana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Norina is foiled. Ediva is eventual. Ediva is unhardened. Ediva is booked. Ediva is youthful. Purcell is eventual. Purcell is foiled. Purcell is adolescent. Purcell is unhardened. Purcell is booked. Purcell is chorionic. Purcell is youthful. Gaylene is eventual. Gaylene is adolescent. Gaylene is youthful. If Purcell is chorionic then Purcell is youthful. If Gaylene is youthful then Gaylene is adolescent. All booked, eventual things are adolescent. All unhardened things are chorionic. All unhardened, youthful things are chorionic. Rough, youthful things are unhardened. If something is eventual then it is booked. If Purcell is youthful and Purcell is unhardened then Purcell is eventual. Norina is not chorionic.", "logic": "\nFoiled(norina)\nEventual(ediva)\nUnhardened(ediva)\nBooked(ediva)\nYouthful(ediva)\nEventual(purcell)\nFoiled(purcell)\nAdolescent(purcell)\nUnhardened(purcell)\nBooked(purcell)\nChorionic(purcell)\nYouthful(purcell)\nEventual(gaylene)\nAdolescent(gaylene)\nYouthful(gaylene)\nChorionic(purcell) -> Youthful(purcell)\nYouthful(gaylene) -> Adolescent(gaylene)\nforall x (Booked(x) and Eventual(x) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) and Youthful(x) -> Chorionic(x))\nforall x (Booked(x) and Youthful(x) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Eventual(x) -> Booked(x))\nYouthful(purcell) and Unhardened(purcell) -> Eventual(purcell)\n\nnot Chorionic(norina)\n\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Chorionic(x)) <- forall x (Booked(x) and Youthful(x) -> Unhardened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Luanna is suboceanic. Adena is brushlike. Adena is quadratic. Adena is coagulable. Adena is anabolic. Ingeberg is brushlike. Ingeberg is suboceanic. Ingeberg is initial. Ingeberg is quadratic. Ingeberg is coagulable. Ingeberg is dubious. Ingeberg is anabolic. Farica is brushlike. Farica is initial. Farica is anabolic. If Ingeberg is dubious then Ingeberg is anabolic. If Farica is anabolic then Farica is initial. All coagulable, brushlike things are initial. All quadratic things are dubious. All quadratic, anabolic things are dubious. Rough, anabolic things are quadratic. If something is brushlike then it is coagulable. If Ingeberg is anabolic and Ingeberg is quadratic then Ingeberg is brushlike. Luanna is initial.", "logic": "\nSuboceanic(luanna)\nBrushlike(adena)\nQuadratic(adena)\nCoagulable(adena)\nAnabolic(adena)\nBrushlike(ingeberg)\nSuboceanic(ingeberg)\nInitial(ingeberg)\nQuadratic(ingeberg)\nCoagulable(ingeberg)\nDubious(ingeberg)\nAnabolic(ingeberg)\nBrushlike(farica)\nInitial(farica)\nAnabolic(farica)\nDubious(ingeberg) -> Anabolic(ingeberg)\nAnabolic(farica) -> Initial(farica)\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Initial(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Quadratic(x) and Anabolic(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Anabolic(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Brushlike(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nAnabolic(ingeberg) and Quadratic(ingeberg) -> Brushlike(ingeberg)\n\nInitial(luanna)\n\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Initial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Jillana is pemphigous. Doreen is wormlike. Doreen is gooey. Doreen is miffed. Doreen is euphoriant. Hall is wormlike. Hall is pemphigous. Hall is curving. Hall is gooey. Hall is miffed. Hall is paranasal. Hall is euphoriant. Ariadne is wormlike. Ariadne is curving. Ariadne is euphoriant. If Hall is paranasal then Hall is euphoriant. If Ariadne is euphoriant then Ariadne is curving. All miffed, wormlike things are curving. All gooey things are paranasal. All gooey, euphoriant things are paranasal. Rough, euphoriant things are gooey. If something is wormlike then it is miffed. If Hall is euphoriant and Hall is gooey then Hall is wormlike. Jillana is not miffed.", "logic": "\nPemphigous(jillana)\nWormlike(doreen)\nGooey(doreen)\nMiffed(doreen)\nEuphoriant(doreen)\nWormlike(hall)\nPemphigous(hall)\nCurving(hall)\nGooey(hall)\nMiffed(hall)\nParanasal(hall)\nEuphoriant(hall)\nWormlike(ariadne)\nCurving(ariadne)\nEuphoriant(ariadne)\nParanasal(hall) -> Euphoriant(hall)\nEuphoriant(ariadne) -> Curving(ariadne)\nforall x (Miffed(x) and Wormlike(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Gooey(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Gooey(x) and Euphoriant(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Miffed(x) and Euphoriant(x) -> Gooey(x))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Miffed(x))\nEuphoriant(hall) and Gooey(hall) -> Wormlike(hall)\n\nnot Miffed(jillana)\n\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Miffed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Forbes is leaved. Rogers is loopy. Rogers is apelike. Rogers is ringleted. Rogers is aversive. Lissy is loopy. Lissy is leaved. Lissy is flawed. Lissy is apelike. Lissy is ringleted. Lissy is beakless. Lissy is aversive. Cindelyn is loopy. Cindelyn is flawed. Cindelyn is aversive. If Lissy is beakless then Lissy is aversive. If Cindelyn is aversive then Cindelyn is flawed. All ringleted, loopy things are flawed. All apelike things are beakless. All apelike, aversive things are beakless. Rough, aversive things are apelike. If something is loopy then it is ringleted. If Lissy is aversive and Lissy is apelike then Lissy is loopy. Forbes is apelike.", "logic": "\nLeaved(forbes)\nLoopy(rogers)\nApelike(rogers)\nRingleted(rogers)\nAversive(rogers)\nLoopy(lissy)\nLeaved(lissy)\nFlawed(lissy)\nApelike(lissy)\nRingleted(lissy)\nBeakless(lissy)\nAversive(lissy)\nLoopy(cindelyn)\nFlawed(cindelyn)\nAversive(cindelyn)\nBeakless(lissy) -> Aversive(lissy)\nAversive(cindelyn) -> Flawed(cindelyn)\nforall x (Ringleted(x) and Loopy(x) -> Flawed(x))\nforall x (Apelike(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Apelike(x) and Aversive(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) and Aversive(x) -> Apelike(x))\nforall x (Loopy(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nAversive(lissy) and Apelike(lissy) -> Loopy(lissy)\n\nApelike(forbes)\n\nforall x (Ringleted(x) and Aversive(x) -> Apelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Tabby is mobile. Myrah is balding. Myrah is mucinous. Myrah is analgesic. Myrah is unknowing. Cordelia is balding. Cordelia is mobile. Cordelia is indecent. Cordelia is mucinous. Cordelia is analgesic. Cordelia is epileptic. Cordelia is unknowing. Felix is balding. Felix is indecent. Felix is unknowing. If Cordelia is epileptic then Cordelia is unknowing. If Felix is unknowing then Felix is indecent. All analgesic, balding things are indecent. All mucinous things are epileptic. All mucinous, unknowing things are epileptic. Rough, unknowing things are mucinous. If something is balding then it is analgesic. If Cordelia is unknowing and Cordelia is mucinous then Cordelia is balding. Tabby is not balding.", "logic": "\nMobile(tabby)\nBalding(myrah)\nMucinous(myrah)\nAnalgesic(myrah)\nUnknowing(myrah)\nBalding(cordelia)\nMobile(cordelia)\nIndecent(cordelia)\nMucinous(cordelia)\nAnalgesic(cordelia)\nEpileptic(cordelia)\nUnknowing(cordelia)\nBalding(felix)\nIndecent(felix)\nUnknowing(felix)\nEpileptic(cordelia) -> Unknowing(cordelia)\nUnknowing(felix) -> Indecent(felix)\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and Balding(x) -> Indecent(x))\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Mucinous(x) and Unknowing(x) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Analgesic(x) and Unknowing(x) -> Mucinous(x))\nforall x (Balding(x) -> Analgesic(x))\nUnknowing(cordelia) and Mucinous(cordelia) -> Balding(cordelia)\n\nnot Balding(tabby)\n\nnot Balding(tabby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Konstanze is sextuple. Malka is undesirous. Malka is ungraded. Malka is thundery. Malka is condemning. Mairead is undesirous. Mairead is sextuple. Mairead is motionless. Mairead is ungraded. Mairead is thundery. Mairead is repressing. Mairead is condemning. Augustin is undesirous. Augustin is motionless. Augustin is condemning. If Mairead is repressing then Mairead is condemning. If Augustin is condemning then Augustin is motionless. All thundery, undesirous things are motionless. All ungraded things are repressing. All ungraded, condemning things are repressing. Rough, condemning things are ungraded. If something is undesirous then it is thundery. If Mairead is condemning and Mairead is ungraded then Mairead is undesirous. Konstanze is condemning.", "logic": "\nSextuple(konstanze)\nUndesirous(malka)\nUngraded(malka)\nThundery(malka)\nCondemning(malka)\nUndesirous(mairead)\nSextuple(mairead)\nMotionless(mairead)\nUngraded(mairead)\nThundery(mairead)\nRepressing(mairead)\nCondemning(mairead)\nUndesirous(augustin)\nMotionless(augustin)\nCondemning(augustin)\nRepressing(mairead) -> Condemning(mairead)\nCondemning(augustin) -> Motionless(augustin)\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Undesirous(x) -> Motionless(x))\nforall x (Ungraded(x) -> Repressing(x))\nforall x (Ungraded(x) and Condemning(x) -> Repressing(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Condemning(x) -> Ungraded(x))\nforall x (Undesirous(x) -> Thundery(x))\nCondemning(mairead) and Ungraded(mairead) -> Undesirous(mairead)\n\nCondemning(konstanze)\n\nCondemning(konstanze) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Blancha is impetuous. Tersina is unquiet. Tersina is monarchal. Tersina is meandering. Tersina is accented. Neale is unquiet. Neale is impetuous. Neale is bankrupt. Neale is monarchal. Neale is meandering. Neale is autosomal. Neale is accented. Averil is unquiet. Averil is bankrupt. Averil is accented. If Neale is autosomal then Neale is accented. If Averil is accented then Averil is bankrupt. All meandering, unquiet things are bankrupt. All monarchal things are autosomal. All monarchal, accented things are autosomal. Rough, accented things are monarchal. If something is unquiet then it is meandering. If Neale is accented and Neale is monarchal then Neale is unquiet. Averil is not impetuous.", "logic": "\nImpetuous(blancha)\nUnquiet(tersina)\nMonarchal(tersina)\nMeandering(tersina)\nAccented(tersina)\nUnquiet(neale)\nImpetuous(neale)\nBankrupt(neale)\nMonarchal(neale)\nMeandering(neale)\nAutosomal(neale)\nAccented(neale)\nUnquiet(averil)\nBankrupt(averil)\nAccented(averil)\nAutosomal(neale) -> Accented(neale)\nAccented(averil) -> Bankrupt(averil)\nforall x (Meandering(x) and Unquiet(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) -> Autosomal(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) and Accented(x) -> Autosomal(x))\nforall x (Meandering(x) and Accented(x) -> Monarchal(x))\nforall x (Unquiet(x) -> Meandering(x))\nAccented(neale) and Monarchal(neale) -> Unquiet(neale)\n\nnot Impetuous(averil)\n\nnot Impetuous(averil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "Kizzie is sexist. Jerold is conclusive. Jerold is uterine. Jerold is blamable. Jerold is homebound. Belinda is conclusive. Belinda is sexist. Belinda is clinking. Belinda is uterine. Belinda is blamable. Belinda is innumerate. Belinda is homebound. Flo is conclusive. Flo is clinking. Flo is homebound. If Belinda is innumerate then Belinda is homebound. If Flo is homebound then Flo is clinking. All blamable, conclusive things are clinking. All uterine things are innumerate. All uterine, homebound things are innumerate. Rough, homebound things are uterine. If something is conclusive then it is blamable. If Belinda is homebound and Belinda is uterine then Belinda is conclusive. Jerold is sexist.", "logic": "\nSexist(kizzie)\nConclusive(jerold)\nUterine(jerold)\nBlamable(jerold)\nHomebound(jerold)\nConclusive(belinda)\nSexist(belinda)\nClinking(belinda)\nUterine(belinda)\nBlamable(belinda)\nInnumerate(belinda)\nHomebound(belinda)\nConclusive(flo)\nClinking(flo)\nHomebound(flo)\nInnumerate(belinda) -> Homebound(belinda)\nHomebound(flo) -> Clinking(flo)\nforall x (Blamable(x) and Conclusive(x) -> Clinking(x))\nforall x (Uterine(x) -> Innumerate(x))\nforall x (Uterine(x) and Homebound(x) -> Innumerate(x))\nforall x (Blamable(x) and Homebound(x) -> Uterine(x))\nforall x (Conclusive(x) -> Blamable(x))\nHomebound(belinda) and Uterine(belinda) -> Conclusive(belinda)\n\nSexist(jerold)\n\nSexist(jerold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1585"} {"premises": "The betta train the tobye. The betta is unnoted. The betta is lachrymal. The tobye underdress the jerrine. The tobye train the betta. The tobye is indie. The tobye animadvert the jerrine. The jerrine underdress the betta. The jerrine underdress the tobye. The jerrine train the betta. The jerrine animadvert the betta. The jerrine animadvert the tobye. If something is lachrymal and it underdress the tobye then it is scaleless. If something train the betta and it is indie then it train the jerrine. If something underdress the tobye then it train the tobye. If something underdress the jerrine then the jerrine is indie. If the betta animadvert the jerrine and the betta animadvert the tobye then the tobye underdress the jerrine. All unnoted, lachrymal things are unnerving. The betta is unnoted.", "logic": "\nTrain(betta, tobye)\nUnnoted(betta)\nLachrymal(betta)\nUnderdress(tobye, jerrine)\nTrain(tobye, betta)\nIndie(tobye)\nAnimadvert(tobye, jerrine)\nUnderdress(jerrine, betta)\nUnderdress(jerrine, tobye)\nTrain(jerrine, betta)\nAnimadvert(jerrine, betta)\nAnimadvert(jerrine, tobye)\nforall x (Lachrymal(x) and Underdress(x, tobye) -> Scaleless(x))\nforall x (Train(x, betta) and Indie(x) -> Train(x, jerrine))\nforall x (Underdress(x, tobye) -> Train(x, tobye))\nforall x (Underdress(x, jerrine) -> Indie(jerrine))\nAnimadvert(betta, jerrine) and Animadvert(betta, tobye) -> Underdress(tobye, jerrine)\nforall x (Unnoted(x) and Lachrymal(x) -> Unnerving(x))\n\nUnnoted(betta)\n\ntherefore Unnoted(betta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2899"} {"premises": "The caitlin guard the rubetta. The caitlin is aromatic. The caitlin is dormant. The rubetta expose the billy. The rubetta guard the caitlin. The rubetta is unclean. The rubetta buffet the billy. The billy expose the caitlin. The billy expose the rubetta. The billy guard the caitlin. The billy buffet the caitlin. The billy buffet the rubetta. If something is dormant and it expose the rubetta then it is estimable. If something guard the caitlin and it is unclean then it guard the billy. If something expose the rubetta then it guard the rubetta. If something expose the billy then the billy is unclean. If the caitlin buffet the billy and the caitlin buffet the rubetta then the rubetta expose the billy. All aromatic, dormant things are sheer. The rubetta does not eat the caitlin.", "logic": "\nGuard(caitlin, rubetta)\nAromatic(caitlin)\nDormant(caitlin)\nExpose(rubetta, billy)\nGuard(rubetta, caitlin)\nUnclean(rubetta)\nBuffet(rubetta, billy)\nExpose(billy, caitlin)\nExpose(billy, rubetta)\nGuard(billy, caitlin)\nBuffet(billy, caitlin)\nBuffet(billy, rubetta)\nforall x (Dormant(x) and Expose(x, rubetta) -> Estimable(x))\nforall x (Guard(x, caitlin) and Unclean(x) -> Guard(x, billy))\nforall x (Expose(x, rubetta) -> Guard(x, rubetta))\nforall x (Expose(x, billy) -> Unclean(billy))\nBuffet(caitlin, billy) and Buffet(caitlin, rubetta) -> Expose(rubetta, billy)\nforall x (Aromatic(x) and Dormant(x) -> Sheer(x))\n\nnot Guard(rubetta, caitlin)\n\ntherefore Guard(rubetta, caitlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2899"} {"premises": "The octavia simmer the rickard. The octavia is jangling. The octavia is chambered. The rickard brachiate the cordelie. The rickard simmer the octavia. The rickard is unrequited. The rickard solidify the cordelie. The cordelie brachiate the octavia. The cordelie brachiate the rickard. The cordelie simmer the octavia. The cordelie solidify the octavia. The cordelie solidify the rickard. If something is chambered and it brachiate the rickard then it is suitable. If something simmer the octavia and it is unrequited then it simmer the cordelie. If something brachiate the rickard then it simmer the rickard. If something brachiate the cordelie then the cordelie is unrequited. If the octavia solidify the cordelie and the octavia solidify the rickard then the rickard brachiate the cordelie. All jangling, chambered things are recurvate. The rickard is not suitable.", "logic": "\nSimmer(octavia, rickard)\nJangling(octavia)\nChambered(octavia)\nBrachiate(rickard, cordelie)\nSimmer(rickard, octavia)\nUnrequited(rickard)\nSolidify(rickard, cordelie)\nBrachiate(cordelie, octavia)\nBrachiate(cordelie, rickard)\nSimmer(cordelie, octavia)\nSolidify(cordelie, octavia)\nSolidify(cordelie, rickard)\nforall x (Chambered(x) and Brachiate(x, rickard) -> Suitable(x))\nforall x (Simmer(x, octavia) and Unrequited(x) -> Simmer(x, cordelie))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, rickard) -> Simmer(x, rickard))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, cordelie) -> Unrequited(cordelie))\nSolidify(octavia, cordelie) and Solidify(octavia, rickard) -> Brachiate(rickard, cordelie)\nforall x (Jangling(x) and Chambered(x) -> Recurvate(x))\n\nnot Suitable(rickard)\n\nforall x (Chambered(x) and Brachiate(x, rickard) -> Suitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2899"} {"premises": "The norean fondle the nicolle. The norean is unabashed. The norean is fleshy. The nicolle spatter the milissent. The nicolle fondle the norean. The nicolle is alleviated. The nicolle fetter the milissent. The milissent spatter the norean. The milissent spatter the nicolle. The milissent fondle the norean. The milissent fetter the norean. The milissent fetter the nicolle. If something is fleshy and it spatter the nicolle then it is releasing. If something fondle the norean and it is alleviated then it fondle the milissent. If something spatter the nicolle then it fondle the nicolle. If something spatter the milissent then the milissent is alleviated. If the norean fetter the milissent and the norean fetter the nicolle then the nicolle spatter the milissent. All unabashed, fleshy things are shakedown. The nicolle fetter the norean.", "logic": "\nFondle(norean, nicolle)\nUnabashed(norean)\nFleshy(norean)\nSpatter(nicolle, milissent)\nFondle(nicolle, norean)\nAlleviated(nicolle)\nFetter(nicolle, milissent)\nSpatter(milissent, norean)\nSpatter(milissent, nicolle)\nFondle(milissent, norean)\nFetter(milissent, norean)\nFetter(milissent, nicolle)\nforall x (Fleshy(x) and Spatter(x, nicolle) -> Releasing(x))\nforall x (Fondle(x, norean) and Alleviated(x) -> Fondle(x, milissent))\nforall x (Spatter(x, nicolle) -> Fondle(x, nicolle))\nforall x (Spatter(x, milissent) -> Alleviated(milissent))\nFetter(norean, milissent) and Fetter(norean, nicolle) -> Spatter(nicolle, milissent)\nforall x (Unabashed(x) and Fleshy(x) -> Shakedown(x))\n\nFetter(nicolle, norean)\n\nFetter(nicolle, norean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2899"} {"premises": "Laurice is cattish. Adorne is auditory. Beryl is auditory. Nicholas is unfettered. Nicholas is dormie. Nicholas is plastic. Nicholas is whatever. If Beryl is cattish then Beryl is unfettered. Nicholas is dormie.", "logic": "\nCattish(laurice)\nAuditory(adorne)\nAuditory(beryl)\nUnfettered(nicholas)\nDormie(nicholas)\nPlastic(nicholas)\nWhatever(nicholas)\nCattish(beryl) -> Unfettered(beryl)\n\nDormie(nicholas)\n\ntherefore Dormie(nicholas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7"} {"premises": "Willamina is indecisive. Suzanna is moribund. Jonas is moribund. Sandro is uncropped. Sandro is tensional. Sandro is vexatious. Sandro is godlike. If Jonas is indecisive then Jonas is uncropped. Jonas is not moribund.", "logic": "\nIndecisive(willamina)\nMoribund(suzanna)\nMoribund(jonas)\nUncropped(sandro)\nTensional(sandro)\nVexatious(sandro)\nGodlike(sandro)\nIndecisive(jonas) -> Uncropped(jonas)\n\nnot Moribund(jonas)\n\ntherefore Moribund(jonas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7"} {"premises": "Penelopa is tongued. Tome is throwaway. Kristien is throwaway. Annabelle is like. Annabelle is jagged. Annabelle is agelong. Annabelle is naiant. If Kristien is tongued then Kristien is like. Kristien is not like.", "logic": "\nTongued(penelopa)\nThrowaway(tome)\nThrowaway(kristien)\nLike(annabelle)\nJagged(annabelle)\nAgelong(annabelle)\nNaiant(annabelle)\nTongued(kristien) -> Like(kristien)\n\nnot Like(kristien)\n\nTongued(kristien) -> Like(kristien) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7"} {"premises": "Sibbie is blooming. Clovis is biddable. Trix is biddable. Alston is glaring. Alston is voltarian. Alston is trapped. Alston is hematal. If Trix is blooming then Trix is glaring. Alston is red.", "logic": "\nBlooming(sibbie)\nBiddable(clovis)\nBiddable(trix)\nGlaring(alston)\nVoltarian(alston)\nTrapped(alston)\nHematal(alston)\nBlooming(trix) -> Glaring(trix)\n\nRed(alston)\n\nRed(alston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7"} {"premises": "The dita flub the jenine. The dita is concentric. The dita is layered. The dita is nauseous. The dita is exuberant. The dita is taloned. The dita case the jenine. The dita unstrain the jenine. The jenine flub the dita. The jenine is concentric. The jenine is layered. The jenine is nauseous. The jenine is exuberant. The jenine is taloned. The jenine case the dita. The jenine unstrain the dita. If something unstrain the dita then it flub the dita. If something unstrain the dita and it unstrain the jenine then the jenine unstrain the dita. If something flub the dita then it case the dita. If something flub the jenine and the jenine unstrain the dita then it case the jenine. If something case the jenine and it case the dita then it flub the jenine. If something unstrain the jenine and it is layered then the jenine is concentric. If something unstrain the jenine and the jenine unstrain the dita then the jenine case the dita. If something case the jenine then it unstrain the dita. The dita case the jenine.", "logic": "\nFlub(dita, jenine)\nConcentric(dita)\nLayered(dita)\nNauseous(dita)\nExuberant(dita)\nTaloned(dita)\nCase(dita, jenine)\nUnstrain(dita, jenine)\nFlub(jenine, dita)\nConcentric(jenine)\nLayered(jenine)\nNauseous(jenine)\nExuberant(jenine)\nTaloned(jenine)\nCase(jenine, dita)\nUnstrain(jenine, dita)\nforall x (Unstrain(x, dita) -> Flub(x, dita))\nforall x (Unstrain(x, dita) and Unstrain(x, jenine) -> Unstrain(jenine, dita))\nforall x (Flub(x, dita) -> Case(x, dita))\nforall x (Flub(x, jenine) and Unstrain(jenine, dita) -> Case(x, jenine))\nforall x (Case(x, jenine) and Case(x, dita) -> Flub(x, jenine))\nforall x (Unstrain(x, jenine) and Layered(x) -> Concentric(jenine))\nforall x (Unstrain(x, jenine) and Unstrain(jenine, dita) -> Case(jenine, dita))\nforall x (Case(x, jenine) -> Unstrain(x, dita))\n\nCase(dita, jenine)\n\ntherefore Case(dita, jenine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The rodi anoint the dennie. The rodi is cilial. The rodi is abuzz. The rodi is trilobated. The rodi is bronzed. The rodi is centered. The rodi neutralize the dennie. The rodi scrub the dennie. The dennie anoint the rodi. The dennie is cilial. The dennie is abuzz. The dennie is trilobated. The dennie is bronzed. The dennie is centered. The dennie neutralize the rodi. The dennie scrub the rodi. If something scrub the rodi then it anoint the rodi. If something scrub the rodi and it scrub the dennie then the dennie scrub the rodi. If something anoint the rodi then it neutralize the rodi. If something anoint the dennie and the dennie scrub the rodi then it neutralize the dennie. If something neutralize the dennie and it neutralize the rodi then it anoint the dennie. If something scrub the dennie and it is abuzz then the dennie is cilial. If something scrub the dennie and the dennie scrub the rodi then the dennie neutralize the rodi. If something neutralize the dennie then it scrub the rodi. The rodi is not trilobated.", "logic": "\nAnoint(rodi, dennie)\nCilial(rodi)\nAbuzz(rodi)\nTrilobated(rodi)\nBronzed(rodi)\nCentered(rodi)\nNeutralize(rodi, dennie)\nScrub(rodi, dennie)\nAnoint(dennie, rodi)\nCilial(dennie)\nAbuzz(dennie)\nTrilobated(dennie)\nBronzed(dennie)\nCentered(dennie)\nNeutralize(dennie, rodi)\nScrub(dennie, rodi)\nforall x (Scrub(x, rodi) -> Anoint(x, rodi))\nforall x (Scrub(x, rodi) and Scrub(x, dennie) -> Scrub(dennie, rodi))\nforall x (Anoint(x, rodi) -> Neutralize(x, rodi))\nforall x (Anoint(x, dennie) and Scrub(dennie, rodi) -> Neutralize(x, dennie))\nforall x (Neutralize(x, dennie) and Neutralize(x, rodi) -> Anoint(x, dennie))\nforall x (Scrub(x, dennie) and Abuzz(x) -> Cilial(dennie))\nforall x (Scrub(x, dennie) and Scrub(dennie, rodi) -> Neutralize(dennie, rodi))\nforall x (Neutralize(x, dennie) -> Scrub(x, rodi))\n\nnot Trilobated(rodi)\n\ntherefore Trilobated(rodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The broderic madder the olympe. The broderic is poignant. The broderic is crass. The broderic is whippy. The broderic is weathered. The broderic is lateral. The broderic unclip the olympe. The broderic worm the olympe. The olympe madder the broderic. The olympe is poignant. The olympe is crass. The olympe is whippy. The olympe is weathered. The olympe is lateral. The olympe unclip the broderic. The olympe worm the broderic. If something worm the broderic then it madder the broderic. If something worm the broderic and it worm the olympe then the olympe worm the broderic. If something madder the broderic then it unclip the broderic. If something madder the olympe and the olympe worm the broderic then it unclip the olympe. If something unclip the olympe and it unclip the broderic then it madder the olympe. If something worm the olympe and it is crass then the olympe is poignant. If something worm the olympe and the olympe worm the broderic then the olympe unclip the broderic. If something unclip the olympe then it worm the broderic. The broderic worm the broderic.", "logic": "\nMadder(broderic, olympe)\nPoignant(broderic)\nCrass(broderic)\nWhippy(broderic)\nWeathered(broderic)\nLateral(broderic)\nUnclip(broderic, olympe)\nWorm(broderic, olympe)\nMadder(olympe, broderic)\nPoignant(olympe)\nCrass(olympe)\nWhippy(olympe)\nWeathered(olympe)\nLateral(olympe)\nUnclip(olympe, broderic)\nWorm(olympe, broderic)\nforall x (Worm(x, broderic) -> Madder(x, broderic))\nforall x (Worm(x, broderic) and Worm(x, olympe) -> Worm(olympe, broderic))\nforall x (Madder(x, broderic) -> Unclip(x, broderic))\nforall x (Madder(x, olympe) and Worm(olympe, broderic) -> Unclip(x, olympe))\nforall x (Unclip(x, olympe) and Unclip(x, broderic) -> Madder(x, olympe))\nforall x (Worm(x, olympe) and Crass(x) -> Poignant(olympe))\nforall x (Worm(x, olympe) and Worm(olympe, broderic) -> Unclip(olympe, broderic))\nforall x (Unclip(x, olympe) -> Worm(x, broderic))\n\nWorm(broderic, broderic)\n\nUnclip(broderic, olympe) and forall x (Unclip(x, olympe) -> Worm(x, broderic)) -> therefore Worm(broderic, broderic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The emili mistrust the andrzej. The emili is clenched. The emili is overshot. The emili is ghanian. The emili is superfine. The emili is foursquare. The emili localize the andrzej. The emili brocade the andrzej. The andrzej mistrust the emili. The andrzej is clenched. The andrzej is overshot. The andrzej is ghanian. The andrzej is superfine. The andrzej is foursquare. The andrzej localize the emili. The andrzej brocade the emili. If something brocade the emili then it mistrust the emili. If something brocade the emili and it brocade the andrzej then the andrzej brocade the emili. If something mistrust the emili then it localize the emili. If something mistrust the andrzej and the andrzej brocade the emili then it localize the andrzej. If something localize the andrzej and it localize the emili then it mistrust the andrzej. If something brocade the andrzej and it is overshot then the andrzej is clenched. If something brocade the andrzej and the andrzej brocade the emili then the andrzej localize the emili. If something localize the andrzej then it brocade the emili. The emili does not see the emili.", "logic": "\nMistrust(emili, andrzej)\nClenched(emili)\nOvershot(emili)\nGhanian(emili)\nSuperfine(emili)\nFoursquare(emili)\nLocalize(emili, andrzej)\nBrocade(emili, andrzej)\nMistrust(andrzej, emili)\nClenched(andrzej)\nOvershot(andrzej)\nGhanian(andrzej)\nSuperfine(andrzej)\nFoursquare(andrzej)\nLocalize(andrzej, emili)\nBrocade(andrzej, emili)\nforall x (Brocade(x, emili) -> Mistrust(x, emili))\nforall x (Brocade(x, emili) and Brocade(x, andrzej) -> Brocade(andrzej, emili))\nforall x (Mistrust(x, emili) -> Localize(x, emili))\nforall x (Mistrust(x, andrzej) and Brocade(andrzej, emili) -> Localize(x, andrzej))\nforall x (Localize(x, andrzej) and Localize(x, emili) -> Mistrust(x, andrzej))\nforall x (Brocade(x, andrzej) and Overshot(x) -> Clenched(andrzej))\nforall x (Brocade(x, andrzej) and Brocade(andrzej, emili) -> Localize(andrzej, emili))\nforall x (Localize(x, andrzej) -> Brocade(x, emili))\n\nnot Brocade(emili, emili)\n\nLocalize(emili, andrzej) and forall x (Localize(x, andrzej) -> Brocade(x, emili)) -> therefore Brocade(emili, emili)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The raleigh delegate the hill. The raleigh is gasified. The raleigh is sprightly. The raleigh is avirulent. The raleigh is fusible. The raleigh is inscribed. The raleigh profit the hill. The raleigh trump the hill. The hill delegate the raleigh. The hill is gasified. The hill is sprightly. The hill is avirulent. The hill is fusible. The hill is inscribed. The hill profit the raleigh. The hill trump the raleigh. If something trump the raleigh then it delegate the raleigh. If something trump the raleigh and it trump the hill then the hill trump the raleigh. If something delegate the raleigh then it profit the raleigh. If something delegate the hill and the hill trump the raleigh then it profit the hill. If something profit the hill and it profit the raleigh then it delegate the hill. If something trump the hill and it is sprightly then the hill is gasified. If something trump the hill and the hill trump the raleigh then the hill profit the raleigh. If something profit the hill then it trump the raleigh. The raleigh delegate the raleigh.", "logic": "\nDelegate(raleigh, hill)\nGasified(raleigh)\nSprightly(raleigh)\nAvirulent(raleigh)\nFusible(raleigh)\nInscribed(raleigh)\nProfit(raleigh, hill)\nTrump(raleigh, hill)\nDelegate(hill, raleigh)\nGasified(hill)\nSprightly(hill)\nAvirulent(hill)\nFusible(hill)\nInscribed(hill)\nProfit(hill, raleigh)\nTrump(hill, raleigh)\nforall x (Trump(x, raleigh) -> Delegate(x, raleigh))\nforall x (Trump(x, raleigh) and Trump(x, hill) -> Trump(hill, raleigh))\nforall x (Delegate(x, raleigh) -> Profit(x, raleigh))\nforall x (Delegate(x, hill) and Trump(hill, raleigh) -> Profit(x, hill))\nforall x (Profit(x, hill) and Profit(x, raleigh) -> Delegate(x, hill))\nforall x (Trump(x, hill) and Sprightly(x) -> Gasified(hill))\nforall x (Trump(x, hill) and Trump(hill, raleigh) -> Profit(hill, raleigh))\nforall x (Profit(x, hill) -> Trump(x, raleigh))\n\nDelegate(raleigh, raleigh)\n\nProfit(raleigh, hill) and forall x (Profit(x, hill) -> Trump(x, raleigh)) -> therefore Trump(raleigh, raleigh) Trump(raleigh, raleigh) and forall x (Trump(x, raleigh) -> Delegate(x, raleigh)) -> therefore Delegate(raleigh, raleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The hanna bronze the clarie. The hanna is deferent. The hanna is amusing. The hanna is unassured. The hanna is redundant. The hanna is speaking. The hanna corrode the clarie. The hanna dynamise the clarie. The clarie bronze the hanna. The clarie is deferent. The clarie is amusing. The clarie is unassured. The clarie is redundant. The clarie is speaking. The clarie corrode the hanna. The clarie dynamise the hanna. If something dynamise the hanna then it bronze the hanna. If something dynamise the hanna and it dynamise the clarie then the clarie dynamise the hanna. If something bronze the hanna then it corrode the hanna. If something bronze the clarie and the clarie dynamise the hanna then it corrode the clarie. If something corrode the clarie and it corrode the hanna then it bronze the clarie. If something dynamise the clarie and it is amusing then the clarie is deferent. If something dynamise the clarie and the clarie dynamise the hanna then the clarie corrode the hanna. If something corrode the clarie then it dynamise the hanna. The hanna does not chase the hanna.", "logic": "\nBronze(hanna, clarie)\nDeferent(hanna)\nAmusing(hanna)\nUnassured(hanna)\nRedundant(hanna)\nSpeaking(hanna)\nCorrode(hanna, clarie)\nDynamise(hanna, clarie)\nBronze(clarie, hanna)\nDeferent(clarie)\nAmusing(clarie)\nUnassured(clarie)\nRedundant(clarie)\nSpeaking(clarie)\nCorrode(clarie, hanna)\nDynamise(clarie, hanna)\nforall x (Dynamise(x, hanna) -> Bronze(x, hanna))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, hanna) and Dynamise(x, clarie) -> Dynamise(clarie, hanna))\nforall x (Bronze(x, hanna) -> Corrode(x, hanna))\nforall x (Bronze(x, clarie) and Dynamise(clarie, hanna) -> Corrode(x, clarie))\nforall x (Corrode(x, clarie) and Corrode(x, hanna) -> Bronze(x, clarie))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, clarie) and Amusing(x) -> Deferent(clarie))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, clarie) and Dynamise(clarie, hanna) -> Corrode(clarie, hanna))\nforall x (Corrode(x, clarie) -> Dynamise(x, hanna))\n\nnot Bronze(hanna, hanna)\n\nCorrode(hanna, clarie) and forall x (Corrode(x, clarie) -> Dynamise(x, hanna)) -> therefore Dynamise(hanna, hanna) Dynamise(hanna, hanna) and forall x (Dynamise(x, hanna) -> Bronze(x, hanna)) -> therefore Bronze(hanna, hanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The rani explode the theodore. The rani is annalistic. The rani is logy. The rani is curly. The rani is farseeing. The rani is nonelected. The rani readapt the theodore. The rani hiccup the theodore. The theodore explode the rani. The theodore is annalistic. The theodore is logy. The theodore is curly. The theodore is farseeing. The theodore is nonelected. The theodore readapt the rani. The theodore hiccup the rani. If something hiccup the rani then it explode the rani. If something hiccup the rani and it hiccup the theodore then the theodore hiccup the rani. If something explode the rani then it readapt the rani. If something explode the theodore and the theodore hiccup the rani then it readapt the theodore. If something readapt the theodore and it readapt the rani then it explode the theodore. If something hiccup the theodore and it is logy then the theodore is annalistic. If something hiccup the theodore and the theodore hiccup the rani then the theodore readapt the rani. If something readapt the theodore then it hiccup the rani. The rani readapt the rani.", "logic": "\nExplode(rani, theodore)\nAnnalistic(rani)\nLogy(rani)\nCurly(rani)\nFarseeing(rani)\nNonelected(rani)\nReadapt(rani, theodore)\nHiccup(rani, theodore)\nExplode(theodore, rani)\nAnnalistic(theodore)\nLogy(theodore)\nCurly(theodore)\nFarseeing(theodore)\nNonelected(theodore)\nReadapt(theodore, rani)\nHiccup(theodore, rani)\nforall x (Hiccup(x, rani) -> Explode(x, rani))\nforall x (Hiccup(x, rani) and Hiccup(x, theodore) -> Hiccup(theodore, rani))\nforall x (Explode(x, rani) -> Readapt(x, rani))\nforall x (Explode(x, theodore) and Hiccup(theodore, rani) -> Readapt(x, theodore))\nforall x (Readapt(x, theodore) and Readapt(x, rani) -> Explode(x, theodore))\nforall x (Hiccup(x, theodore) and Logy(x) -> Annalistic(theodore))\nforall x (Hiccup(x, theodore) and Hiccup(theodore, rani) -> Readapt(theodore, rani))\nforall x (Readapt(x, theodore) -> Hiccup(x, rani))\n\nReadapt(rani, rani)\n\nReadapt(rani, theodore) and forall x (Readapt(x, theodore) -> Hiccup(x, rani)) -> therefore Hiccup(rani, rani) Hiccup(rani, rani) and forall x (Hiccup(x, rani) -> Explode(x, rani)) -> therefore Explode(rani, rani) Explode(rani, rani) and forall x (Explode(x, rani) -> Readapt(x, rani)) -> therefore Readapt(rani, rani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The kellina renew the siegfried. The kellina is psychical. The kellina is bicornuous. The kellina is knobbed. The kellina is undrained. The kellina is unearthly. The kellina expire the siegfried. The kellina fluoridize the siegfried. The siegfried renew the kellina. The siegfried is psychical. The siegfried is bicornuous. The siegfried is knobbed. The siegfried is undrained. The siegfried is unearthly. The siegfried expire the kellina. The siegfried fluoridize the kellina. If something fluoridize the kellina then it renew the kellina. If something fluoridize the kellina and it fluoridize the siegfried then the siegfried fluoridize the kellina. If something renew the kellina then it expire the kellina. If something renew the siegfried and the siegfried fluoridize the kellina then it expire the siegfried. If something expire the siegfried and it expire the kellina then it renew the siegfried. If something fluoridize the siegfried and it is bicornuous then the siegfried is psychical. If something fluoridize the siegfried and the siegfried fluoridize the kellina then the siegfried expire the kellina. If something expire the siegfried then it fluoridize the kellina. The kellina does not like the kellina.", "logic": "\nRenew(kellina, siegfried)\nPsychical(kellina)\nBicornuous(kellina)\nKnobbed(kellina)\nUndrained(kellina)\nUnearthly(kellina)\nExpire(kellina, siegfried)\nFluoridize(kellina, siegfried)\nRenew(siegfried, kellina)\nPsychical(siegfried)\nBicornuous(siegfried)\nKnobbed(siegfried)\nUndrained(siegfried)\nUnearthly(siegfried)\nExpire(siegfried, kellina)\nFluoridize(siegfried, kellina)\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, kellina) -> Renew(x, kellina))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, kellina) and Fluoridize(x, siegfried) -> Fluoridize(siegfried, kellina))\nforall x (Renew(x, kellina) -> Expire(x, kellina))\nforall x (Renew(x, siegfried) and Fluoridize(siegfried, kellina) -> Expire(x, siegfried))\nforall x (Expire(x, siegfried) and Expire(x, kellina) -> Renew(x, siegfried))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, siegfried) and Bicornuous(x) -> Psychical(siegfried))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, siegfried) and Fluoridize(siegfried, kellina) -> Expire(siegfried, kellina))\nforall x (Expire(x, siegfried) -> Fluoridize(x, kellina))\n\nnot Expire(kellina, kellina)\n\nExpire(kellina, siegfried) and forall x (Expire(x, siegfried) -> Fluoridize(x, kellina)) -> therefore Fluoridize(kellina, kellina) Fluoridize(kellina, kellina) and forall x (Fluoridize(x, kellina) -> Renew(x, kellina)) -> therefore Renew(kellina, kellina) Renew(kellina, kellina) and forall x (Renew(x, kellina) -> Expire(x, kellina)) -> therefore Expire(kellina, kellina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The desaree chomp the chevy. The desaree is unexploded. The desaree is sylphlike. The desaree is bloodshot. The desaree is artless. The desaree is flagrant. The desaree canonise the chevy. The desaree inseminate the chevy. The chevy chomp the desaree. The chevy is unexploded. The chevy is sylphlike. The chevy is bloodshot. The chevy is artless. The chevy is flagrant. The chevy canonise the desaree. The chevy inseminate the desaree. If something inseminate the desaree then it chomp the desaree. If something inseminate the desaree and it inseminate the chevy then the chevy inseminate the desaree. If something chomp the desaree then it canonise the desaree. If something chomp the chevy and the chevy inseminate the desaree then it canonise the chevy. If something canonise the chevy and it canonise the desaree then it chomp the chevy. If something inseminate the chevy and it is sylphlike then the chevy is unexploded. If something inseminate the chevy and the chevy inseminate the desaree then the chevy canonise the desaree. If something canonise the chevy then it inseminate the desaree. The chevy does not chase the chevy.", "logic": "\nChomp(desaree, chevy)\nUnexploded(desaree)\nSylphlike(desaree)\nBloodshot(desaree)\nArtless(desaree)\nFlagrant(desaree)\nCanonise(desaree, chevy)\nInseminate(desaree, chevy)\nChomp(chevy, desaree)\nUnexploded(chevy)\nSylphlike(chevy)\nBloodshot(chevy)\nArtless(chevy)\nFlagrant(chevy)\nCanonise(chevy, desaree)\nInseminate(chevy, desaree)\nforall x (Inseminate(x, desaree) -> Chomp(x, desaree))\nforall x (Inseminate(x, desaree) and Inseminate(x, chevy) -> Inseminate(chevy, desaree))\nforall x (Chomp(x, desaree) -> Canonise(x, desaree))\nforall x (Chomp(x, chevy) and Inseminate(chevy, desaree) -> Canonise(x, chevy))\nforall x (Canonise(x, chevy) and Canonise(x, desaree) -> Chomp(x, chevy))\nforall x (Inseminate(x, chevy) and Sylphlike(x) -> Unexploded(chevy))\nforall x (Inseminate(x, chevy) and Inseminate(chevy, desaree) -> Canonise(chevy, desaree))\nforall x (Canonise(x, chevy) -> Inseminate(x, desaree))\n\nnot Chomp(chevy, chevy)\n\nforall x (Canonise(x, chevy) and Canonise(x, desaree) -> Chomp(x, chevy)) <- forall x (Chomp(x, chevy) and Inseminate(chevy, desaree) -> Canonise(x, chevy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "The merla skunk the sharron. The merla is caliginous. The merla is sibylline. The merla is soundproof. The merla is eponymic. The merla is pedestrian. The merla return the sharron. The merla prettify the sharron. The sharron skunk the merla. The sharron is caliginous. The sharron is sibylline. The sharron is soundproof. The sharron is eponymic. The sharron is pedestrian. The sharron return the merla. The sharron prettify the merla. If something prettify the merla then it skunk the merla. If something prettify the merla and it prettify the sharron then the sharron prettify the merla. If something skunk the merla then it return the merla. If something skunk the sharron and the sharron prettify the merla then it return the sharron. If something return the sharron and it return the merla then it skunk the sharron. If something prettify the sharron and it is sibylline then the sharron is caliginous. If something prettify the sharron and the sharron prettify the merla then the sharron return the merla. If something return the sharron then it prettify the merla. The sharron return the sharron.", "logic": "\nSkunk(merla, sharron)\nCaliginous(merla)\nSibylline(merla)\nSoundproof(merla)\nEponymic(merla)\nPedestrian(merla)\nReturn(merla, sharron)\nPrettify(merla, sharron)\nSkunk(sharron, merla)\nCaliginous(sharron)\nSibylline(sharron)\nSoundproof(sharron)\nEponymic(sharron)\nPedestrian(sharron)\nReturn(sharron, merla)\nPrettify(sharron, merla)\nforall x (Prettify(x, merla) -> Skunk(x, merla))\nforall x (Prettify(x, merla) and Prettify(x, sharron) -> Prettify(sharron, merla))\nforall x (Skunk(x, merla) -> Return(x, merla))\nforall x (Skunk(x, sharron) and Prettify(sharron, merla) -> Return(x, sharron))\nforall x (Return(x, sharron) and Return(x, merla) -> Skunk(x, sharron))\nforall x (Prettify(x, sharron) and Sibylline(x) -> Caliginous(sharron))\nforall x (Prettify(x, sharron) and Prettify(sharron, merla) -> Return(sharron, merla))\nforall x (Return(x, sharron) -> Prettify(x, merla))\n\nReturn(sharron, sharron)\n\nforall x (Skunk(x, sharron) and Prettify(sharron, merla) -> Return(x, sharron)) <- forall x (Return(x, sharron) and Return(x, merla) -> Skunk(x, sharron)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1482"} {"premises": "Ibby is random. Ibby is sweetened. Latia is vigesimal. Latia is jerking. Latia is random. Latia is sweetened. Latia is disguised. Riva is swinish. Riva is jerking. Riva is saprozoic. Riva is sweetened. Emelia is vigesimal. Emelia is jerking. Emelia is random. Emelia is saprozoic. Emelia is sweetened. All random people are jerking. White people are vigesimal. If someone is vigesimal then they are random. If someone is jerking and random then they are disguised. If someone is random then they are vigesimal. If someone is disguised then they are swinish. Ibby is random.", "logic": "\nRandom(ibby)\nSweetened(ibby)\nVigesimal(latia)\nJerking(latia)\nRandom(latia)\nSweetened(latia)\nDisguised(latia)\nSwinish(riva)\nJerking(riva)\nSaprozoic(riva)\nSweetened(riva)\nVigesimal(emelia)\nJerking(emelia)\nRandom(emelia)\nSaprozoic(emelia)\nSweetened(emelia)\nforall x (Random(x) -> Jerking(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\nforall x (Vigesimal(x) -> Random(x))\nforall x (Jerking(x) and Random(x) -> Disguised(x))\nforall x (Random(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) -> Swinish(x))\n\nRandom(ibby)\n\ntherefore Random(ibby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Esmaria is gaussian. Esmaria is enforced. Dosi is coseismic. Dosi is offending. Dosi is gaussian. Dosi is enforced. Dosi is adenoidal. Pierrette is frumpish. Pierrette is offending. Pierrette is burnished. Pierrette is enforced. Jeanne is coseismic. Jeanne is offending. Jeanne is gaussian. Jeanne is burnished. Jeanne is enforced. All gaussian people are offending. White people are coseismic. If someone is coseismic then they are gaussian. If someone is offending and gaussian then they are adenoidal. If someone is gaussian then they are coseismic. If someone is adenoidal then they are frumpish. Jeanne is not burnished.", "logic": "\nGaussian(esmaria)\nEnforced(esmaria)\nCoseismic(dosi)\nOffending(dosi)\nGaussian(dosi)\nEnforced(dosi)\nAdenoidal(dosi)\nFrumpish(pierrette)\nOffending(pierrette)\nBurnished(pierrette)\nEnforced(pierrette)\nCoseismic(jeanne)\nOffending(jeanne)\nGaussian(jeanne)\nBurnished(jeanne)\nEnforced(jeanne)\nforall x (Gaussian(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) -> Gaussian(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) and Gaussian(x) -> Adenoidal(x))\nforall x (Gaussian(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Frumpish(x))\n\nnot Burnished(jeanne)\n\ntherefore Burnished(jeanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Domenic is arching. Domenic is aspectual. Saraann is inspiring. Saraann is ameboid. Saraann is arching. Saraann is aspectual. Saraann is tiered. Elizabet is jolly. Elizabet is ameboid. Elizabet is eremitic. Elizabet is aspectual. Tressa is inspiring. Tressa is ameboid. Tressa is arching. Tressa is eremitic. Tressa is aspectual. All arching people are ameboid. White people are inspiring. If someone is inspiring then they are arching. If someone is ameboid and arching then they are tiered. If someone is arching then they are inspiring. If someone is tiered then they are jolly. Saraann is jolly.", "logic": "\nArching(domenic)\nAspectual(domenic)\nInspiring(saraann)\nAmeboid(saraann)\nArching(saraann)\nAspectual(saraann)\nTiered(saraann)\nJolly(elizabet)\nAmeboid(elizabet)\nEremitic(elizabet)\nAspectual(elizabet)\nInspiring(tressa)\nAmeboid(tressa)\nArching(tressa)\nEremitic(tressa)\nAspectual(tressa)\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Ameboid(x))\nforall x (Tiered(x) -> Inspiring(x))\nforall x (Inspiring(x) -> Arching(x))\nforall x (Ameboid(x) and Arching(x) -> Tiered(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Inspiring(x))\nforall x (Tiered(x) -> Jolly(x))\n\nJolly(saraann)\n\nTiered(saraann) and forall x (Tiered(x) -> Jolly(x)) -> therefore Jolly(saraann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Poul is unfunded. Poul is inelegant. Xymenes is scrupulous. Xymenes is alright. Xymenes is unfunded. Xymenes is inelegant. Xymenes is hardheaded. Jethro is roughdried. Jethro is alright. Jethro is mauve. Jethro is inelegant. Fergus is scrupulous. Fergus is alright. Fergus is unfunded. Fergus is mauve. Fergus is inelegant. All unfunded people are alright. White people are scrupulous. If someone is scrupulous then they are unfunded. If someone is alright and unfunded then they are hardheaded. If someone is unfunded then they are scrupulous. If someone is hardheaded then they are roughdried. Fergus is not hardheaded.", "logic": "\nUnfunded(poul)\nInelegant(poul)\nScrupulous(xymenes)\nAlright(xymenes)\nUnfunded(xymenes)\nInelegant(xymenes)\nHardheaded(xymenes)\nRoughdried(jethro)\nAlright(jethro)\nMauve(jethro)\nInelegant(jethro)\nScrupulous(fergus)\nAlright(fergus)\nUnfunded(fergus)\nMauve(fergus)\nInelegant(fergus)\nforall x (Unfunded(x) -> Alright(x))\nforall x (Hardheaded(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Alright(x) and Unfunded(x) -> Hardheaded(x))\nforall x (Unfunded(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Hardheaded(x) -> Roughdried(x))\n\nnot Hardheaded(fergus)\n\nAlright(fergus) and Unfunded(fergus) and forall x (Alright(x) and Unfunded(x) -> Hardheaded(x)) -> therefore Hardheaded(fergus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Veriee is stonelike. Veriee is invaluable. Orion is gelded. Orion is bashful. Orion is stonelike. Orion is invaluable. Orion is yeasty. Hamish is revered. Hamish is bashful. Hamish is porticoed. Hamish is invaluable. Babara is gelded. Babara is bashful. Babara is stonelike. Babara is porticoed. Babara is invaluable. All stonelike people are bashful. White people are gelded. If someone is gelded then they are stonelike. If someone is bashful and stonelike then they are yeasty. If someone is stonelike then they are gelded. If someone is yeasty then they are revered. Babara is revered.", "logic": "\nStonelike(veriee)\nInvaluable(veriee)\nGelded(orion)\nBashful(orion)\nStonelike(orion)\nInvaluable(orion)\nYeasty(orion)\nRevered(hamish)\nBashful(hamish)\nPorticoed(hamish)\nInvaluable(hamish)\nGelded(babara)\nBashful(babara)\nStonelike(babara)\nPorticoed(babara)\nInvaluable(babara)\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Gelded(x))\nforall x (Gelded(x) -> Stonelike(x))\nforall x (Bashful(x) and Stonelike(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> Gelded(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Revered(x))\n\nRevered(babara)\n\nBashful(babara) and Stonelike(babara) and forall x (Bashful(x) and Stonelike(x) -> Yeasty(x)) -> therefore Yeasty(babara) Yeasty(babara) and forall x (Yeasty(x) -> Revered(x)) -> therefore Revered(babara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Herta is wavy. Herta is double. Carroll is elliptic. Carroll is metonymic. Carroll is wavy. Carroll is double. Carroll is reentrant. Richmond is sweet. Richmond is metonymic. Richmond is phoney. Richmond is double. Tarra is elliptic. Tarra is metonymic. Tarra is wavy. Tarra is phoney. Tarra is double. All wavy people are metonymic. White people are elliptic. If someone is elliptic then they are wavy. If someone is metonymic and wavy then they are reentrant. If someone is wavy then they are elliptic. If someone is reentrant then they are sweet. Tarra is not sweet.", "logic": "\nWavy(herta)\nDouble(herta)\nElliptic(carroll)\nMetonymic(carroll)\nWavy(carroll)\nDouble(carroll)\nReentrant(carroll)\nSweet(richmond)\nMetonymic(richmond)\nPhoney(richmond)\nDouble(richmond)\nElliptic(tarra)\nMetonymic(tarra)\nWavy(tarra)\nPhoney(tarra)\nDouble(tarra)\nforall x (Wavy(x) -> Metonymic(x))\nforall x (Reentrant(x) -> Elliptic(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Wavy(x))\nforall x (Metonymic(x) and Wavy(x) -> Reentrant(x))\nforall x (Wavy(x) -> Elliptic(x))\nforall x (Reentrant(x) -> Sweet(x))\n\nnot Sweet(tarra)\n\nMetonymic(tarra) and Wavy(tarra) and forall x (Metonymic(x) and Wavy(x) -> Reentrant(x)) -> therefore Reentrant(tarra) Reentrant(tarra) and forall x (Reentrant(x) -> Sweet(x)) -> therefore Sweet(tarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Ilyse is shortened. Ilyse is thermoset. Marianna is downlike. Marianna is congruous. Marianna is shortened. Marianna is thermoset. Marianna is binaural. Jessey is blunted. Jessey is congruous. Jessey is rheumy. Jessey is thermoset. Meris is downlike. Meris is congruous. Meris is shortened. Meris is rheumy. Meris is thermoset. All shortened people are congruous. White people are downlike. If someone is downlike then they are shortened. If someone is congruous and shortened then they are binaural. If someone is shortened then they are downlike. If someone is binaural then they are blunted. Ilyse is blunted.", "logic": "\nShortened(ilyse)\nThermoset(ilyse)\nDownlike(marianna)\nCongruous(marianna)\nShortened(marianna)\nThermoset(marianna)\nBinaural(marianna)\nBlunted(jessey)\nCongruous(jessey)\nRheumy(jessey)\nThermoset(jessey)\nDownlike(meris)\nCongruous(meris)\nShortened(meris)\nRheumy(meris)\nThermoset(meris)\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Congruous(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Downlike(x) -> Shortened(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) and Shortened(x) -> Binaural(x))\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Downlike(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Blunted(x))\n\nBlunted(ilyse)\n\nShortened(ilyse) and forall x (Shortened(x) -> Congruous(x)) -> therefore Congruous(ilyse) Congruous(ilyse) and Shortened(ilyse) and forall x (Congruous(x) and Shortened(x) -> Binaural(x)) -> therefore Binaural(ilyse) Binaural(ilyse) and forall x (Binaural(x) -> Blunted(x)) -> therefore Blunted(ilyse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Francesco is greenside. Francesco is tattered. Halimeda is ordinary. Halimeda is chopped. Halimeda is greenside. Halimeda is tattered. Halimeda is testaceous. Yule is vexatious. Yule is chopped. Yule is unpriestly. Yule is tattered. Christi is ordinary. Christi is chopped. Christi is greenside. Christi is unpriestly. Christi is tattered. All greenside people are chopped. White people are ordinary. If someone is ordinary then they are greenside. If someone is chopped and greenside then they are testaceous. If someone is greenside then they are ordinary. If someone is testaceous then they are vexatious. Francesco is not vexatious.", "logic": "\nGreenside(francesco)\nTattered(francesco)\nOrdinary(halimeda)\nChopped(halimeda)\nGreenside(halimeda)\nTattered(halimeda)\nTestaceous(halimeda)\nVexatious(yule)\nChopped(yule)\nUnpriestly(yule)\nTattered(yule)\nOrdinary(christi)\nChopped(christi)\nGreenside(christi)\nUnpriestly(christi)\nTattered(christi)\nforall x (Greenside(x) -> Chopped(x))\nforall x (Testaceous(x) -> Ordinary(x))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> Greenside(x))\nforall x (Chopped(x) and Greenside(x) -> Testaceous(x))\nforall x (Greenside(x) -> Ordinary(x))\nforall x (Testaceous(x) -> Vexatious(x))\n\nnot Vexatious(francesco)\n\nGreenside(francesco) and forall x (Greenside(x) -> Chopped(x)) -> therefore Chopped(francesco) Chopped(francesco) and Greenside(francesco) and forall x (Chopped(x) and Greenside(x) -> Testaceous(x)) -> therefore Testaceous(francesco) Testaceous(francesco) and forall x (Testaceous(x) -> Vexatious(x)) -> therefore Vexatious(francesco)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Walton is aerial. Walton is arborary. Sarine is bullnecked. Sarine is collagenic. Sarine is aerial. Sarine is arborary. Sarine is upbound. Lars is coptic. Lars is collagenic. Lars is perverted. Lars is arborary. Rubi is bullnecked. Rubi is collagenic. Rubi is aerial. Rubi is perverted. Rubi is arborary. All aerial people are collagenic. White people are bullnecked. If someone is bullnecked then they are aerial. If someone is collagenic and aerial then they are upbound. If someone is aerial then they are bullnecked. If someone is upbound then they are coptic. Lars is not bullnecked.", "logic": "\nAerial(walton)\nArborary(walton)\nBullnecked(sarine)\nCollagenic(sarine)\nAerial(sarine)\nArborary(sarine)\nUpbound(sarine)\nCoptic(lars)\nCollagenic(lars)\nPerverted(lars)\nArborary(lars)\nBullnecked(rubi)\nCollagenic(rubi)\nAerial(rubi)\nPerverted(rubi)\nArborary(rubi)\nforall x (Aerial(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Aerial(x))\nforall x (Collagenic(x) and Aerial(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Aerial(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Coptic(x))\n\nnot Bullnecked(lars)\n\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Bullnecked(x)) <- forall x (Collagenic(x) and Aerial(x) -> Upbound(x)) <- forall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Aerial(x)) <- forall x (Aerial(x) -> Bullnecked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Vladimir is uncool. Vladimir is thespian. Retha is sexy. Retha is jungian. Retha is uncool. Retha is thespian. Retha is upmarket. Vin is cheerful. Vin is jungian. Vin is apogamous. Vin is thespian. Lora is sexy. Lora is jungian. Lora is uncool. Lora is apogamous. Lora is thespian. All uncool people are jungian. White people are sexy. If someone is sexy then they are uncool. If someone is jungian and uncool then they are upmarket. If someone is uncool then they are sexy. If someone is upmarket then they are cheerful. Vin is upmarket.", "logic": "\nUncool(vladimir)\nThespian(vladimir)\nSexy(retha)\nJungian(retha)\nUncool(retha)\nThespian(retha)\nUpmarket(retha)\nCheerful(vin)\nJungian(vin)\nApogamous(vin)\nThespian(vin)\nSexy(lora)\nJungian(lora)\nUncool(lora)\nApogamous(lora)\nThespian(lora)\nforall x (Uncool(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Upmarket(x) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) -> Uncool(x))\nforall x (Jungian(x) and Uncool(x) -> Upmarket(x))\nforall x (Uncool(x) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Upmarket(x) -> Cheerful(x))\n\nUpmarket(vin)\n\nforall x (Jungian(x) and Uncool(x) -> Upmarket(x)) <- forall x (Sexy(x) -> Uncool(x)) <- forall x (Upmarket(x) -> Sexy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Amabel is topknotted. Amabel is lacustrine. Cabrina is utmost. Cabrina is timeworn. Cabrina is topknotted. Cabrina is lacustrine. Cabrina is unwell. Guenevere is rested. Guenevere is timeworn. Guenevere is putrid. Guenevere is lacustrine. Nathalie is utmost. Nathalie is timeworn. Nathalie is topknotted. Nathalie is putrid. Nathalie is lacustrine. All topknotted people are timeworn. White people are utmost. If someone is utmost then they are topknotted. If someone is timeworn and topknotted then they are unwell. If someone is topknotted then they are utmost. If someone is unwell then they are rested. Guenevere is not topknotted.", "logic": "\nTopknotted(amabel)\nLacustrine(amabel)\nUtmost(cabrina)\nTimeworn(cabrina)\nTopknotted(cabrina)\nLacustrine(cabrina)\nUnwell(cabrina)\nRested(guenevere)\nTimeworn(guenevere)\nPutrid(guenevere)\nLacustrine(guenevere)\nUtmost(nathalie)\nTimeworn(nathalie)\nTopknotted(nathalie)\nPutrid(nathalie)\nLacustrine(nathalie)\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Timeworn(x))\nforall x (Unwell(x) -> Utmost(x))\nforall x (Utmost(x) -> Topknotted(x))\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and Topknotted(x) -> Unwell(x))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Utmost(x))\nforall x (Unwell(x) -> Rested(x))\n\nnot Topknotted(guenevere)\n\nforall x (Utmost(x) -> Topknotted(x)) <- forall x (Unwell(x) -> Utmost(x)) <- forall x (Timeworn(x) and Topknotted(x) -> Unwell(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "Helena is libertine. Helena is unthematic. Bab is unavowed. Bab is daunting. Bab is libertine. Bab is unthematic. Bab is kyphotic. Ninetta is prehensile. Ninetta is daunting. Ninetta is trillion. Ninetta is unthematic. Junie is unavowed. Junie is daunting. Junie is libertine. Junie is trillion. Junie is unthematic. All libertine people are daunting. White people are unavowed. If someone is unavowed then they are libertine. If someone is daunting and libertine then they are kyphotic. If someone is libertine then they are unavowed. If someone is kyphotic then they are prehensile. Helena is trillion.", "logic": "\nLibertine(helena)\nUnthematic(helena)\nUnavowed(bab)\nDaunting(bab)\nLibertine(bab)\nUnthematic(bab)\nKyphotic(bab)\nPrehensile(ninetta)\nDaunting(ninetta)\nTrillion(ninetta)\nUnthematic(ninetta)\nUnavowed(junie)\nDaunting(junie)\nLibertine(junie)\nTrillion(junie)\nUnthematic(junie)\nforall x (Libertine(x) -> Daunting(x))\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) -> Unavowed(x))\nforall x (Unavowed(x) -> Libertine(x))\nforall x (Daunting(x) and Libertine(x) -> Kyphotic(x))\nforall x (Libertine(x) -> Unavowed(x))\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) -> Prehensile(x))\n\nTrillion(helena)\n\nTrillion(helena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1485"} {"premises": "The trudie is bodiless. All bodiless people are adequate. If the trudie is witchlike and the trudie is rushlike then the trudie is bodiless. If someone is rushlike then they are surprising. If someone is witchlike and rushlike then they are surprising. If someone is adequate then they are surprising. All surprising, witchlike people are bodiless. If the trudie is rushlike and the trudie is bodiless then the trudie is not surprising. Rough, surprising people are not rushlike. The trudie is bodiless.", "logic": "\nBodiless(trudie)\nforall x (Bodiless(x) -> Adequate(x))\nWitchlike(trudie) and Rushlike(trudie) -> Bodiless(trudie)\nforall x (Rushlike(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) and Rushlike(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Adequate(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Surprising(x) and Witchlike(x) -> Bodiless(x))\nRushlike(trudie) and Bodiless(trudie) -> not Surprising(trudie)\nforall x (Adequate(x) and Surprising(x) -> not Rushlike(x))\n\nBodiless(trudie)\n\ntherefore Bodiless(trudie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The noelle is ambient. All ambient people are mangy. If the noelle is inimical and the noelle is unfeminine then the noelle is ambient. If someone is unfeminine then they are albanian. If someone is inimical and unfeminine then they are albanian. If someone is mangy then they are albanian. All albanian, inimical people are ambient. If the noelle is unfeminine and the noelle is ambient then the noelle is not albanian. Rough, albanian people are not unfeminine. The noelle is not ambient.", "logic": "\nAmbient(noelle)\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> Mangy(x))\nInimical(noelle) and Unfeminine(noelle) -> Ambient(noelle)\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) -> Albanian(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Unfeminine(x) -> Albanian(x))\nforall x (Mangy(x) -> Albanian(x))\nforall x (Albanian(x) and Inimical(x) -> Ambient(x))\nUnfeminine(noelle) and Ambient(noelle) -> not Albanian(noelle)\nforall x (Mangy(x) and Albanian(x) -> not Unfeminine(x))\n\nnot Ambient(noelle)\n\ntherefore Ambient(noelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The darwin is typical. All typical people are perirhinal. If the darwin is highbrow and the darwin is orienting then the darwin is typical. If someone is orienting then they are cerulean. If someone is highbrow and orienting then they are cerulean. If someone is perirhinal then they are cerulean. All cerulean, highbrow people are typical. If the darwin is orienting and the darwin is typical then the darwin is not cerulean. Rough, cerulean people are not orienting. The darwin is perirhinal.", "logic": "\nTypical(darwin)\nforall x (Typical(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nHighbrow(darwin) and Orienting(darwin) -> Typical(darwin)\nforall x (Orienting(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Highbrow(x) and Orienting(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Cerulean(x) and Highbrow(x) -> Typical(x))\nOrienting(darwin) and Typical(darwin) -> not Cerulean(darwin)\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) and Cerulean(x) -> not Orienting(x))\n\nPerirhinal(darwin)\n\nTypical(darwin) and forall x (Typical(x) -> Perirhinal(x)) -> therefore Perirhinal(darwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The eustace is pretorial. All pretorial people are retractile. If the eustace is anuric and the eustace is eager then the eustace is pretorial. If someone is eager then they are hearsay. If someone is anuric and eager then they are hearsay. If someone is retractile then they are hearsay. All hearsay, anuric people are pretorial. If the eustace is eager and the eustace is pretorial then the eustace is not hearsay. Rough, hearsay people are not eager. The eustace is not retractile.", "logic": "\nPretorial(eustace)\nforall x (Pretorial(x) -> Retractile(x))\nAnuric(eustace) and Eager(eustace) -> Pretorial(eustace)\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nforall x (Anuric(x) and Eager(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nforall x (Retractile(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) and Anuric(x) -> Pretorial(x))\nEager(eustace) and Pretorial(eustace) -> not Hearsay(eustace)\nforall x (Retractile(x) and Hearsay(x) -> not Eager(x))\n\nnot Retractile(eustace)\n\nPretorial(eustace) and forall x (Pretorial(x) -> Retractile(x)) -> therefore Retractile(eustace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The dietrich is hydroponic. All hydroponic people are burbly. If the dietrich is meiotic and the dietrich is formalised then the dietrich is hydroponic. If someone is formalised then they are adactylous. If someone is meiotic and formalised then they are adactylous. If someone is burbly then they are adactylous. All adactylous, meiotic people are hydroponic. If the dietrich is formalised and the dietrich is hydroponic then the dietrich is not adactylous. Rough, adactylous people are not formalised. The dietrich is adactylous.", "logic": "\nHydroponic(dietrich)\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Burbly(x))\nMeiotic(dietrich) and Formalised(dietrich) -> Hydroponic(dietrich)\nforall x (Formalised(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) and Formalised(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Burbly(x) -> Adactylous(x))\nforall x (Adactylous(x) and Meiotic(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nFormalised(dietrich) and Hydroponic(dietrich) -> not Adactylous(dietrich)\nforall x (Burbly(x) and Adactylous(x) -> not Formalised(x))\n\nAdactylous(dietrich)\n\nHydroponic(dietrich) and forall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Burbly(x)) -> therefore Burbly(dietrich) Burbly(dietrich) and forall x (Burbly(x) -> Adactylous(x)) -> therefore Adactylous(dietrich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The penny is devout. All devout people are wingless. If the penny is belated and the penny is slaked then the penny is devout. If someone is slaked then they are uptown. If someone is belated and slaked then they are uptown. If someone is wingless then they are uptown. All uptown, belated people are devout. If the penny is slaked and the penny is devout then the penny is not uptown. Rough, uptown people are not slaked. The penny is not uptown.", "logic": "\nDevout(penny)\nforall x (Devout(x) -> Wingless(x))\nBelated(penny) and Slaked(penny) -> Devout(penny)\nforall x (Slaked(x) -> Uptown(x))\nforall x (Belated(x) and Slaked(x) -> Uptown(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Uptown(x))\nforall x (Uptown(x) and Belated(x) -> Devout(x))\nSlaked(penny) and Devout(penny) -> not Uptown(penny)\nforall x (Wingless(x) and Uptown(x) -> not Slaked(x))\n\nnot Uptown(penny)\n\nDevout(penny) and forall x (Devout(x) -> Wingless(x)) -> therefore Wingless(penny) Wingless(penny) and forall x (Wingless(x) -> Uptown(x)) -> therefore Uptown(penny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The bruno is unshapen. All unshapen people are bony. If the bruno is incapable and the bruno is cloddish then the bruno is unshapen. If someone is cloddish then they are unlimited. If someone is incapable and cloddish then they are unlimited. If someone is bony then they are unlimited. All unlimited, incapable people are unshapen. If the bruno is cloddish and the bruno is unshapen then the bruno is not unlimited. Rough, unlimited people are not cloddish. The bruno is not cloddish.", "logic": "\nUnshapen(bruno)\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Bony(x))\nIncapable(bruno) and Cloddish(bruno) -> Unshapen(bruno)\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) and Cloddish(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Bony(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Incapable(x) -> Unshapen(x))\nCloddish(bruno) and Unshapen(bruno) -> not Unlimited(bruno)\nforall x (Bony(x) and Unlimited(x) -> not Cloddish(x))\n\nnot Cloddish(bruno)\n\nUnshapen(bruno) and forall x (Unshapen(x) -> Bony(x)) -> therefore Bony(bruno) Unshapen(bruno) and forall x (Unshapen(x) -> Bony(x)) -> therefore Bony(bruno) Bony(bruno) and forall x (Bony(x) -> Unlimited(x)) -> therefore Unlimited(bruno) Bony(bruno) and Unlimited(bruno) and forall x (Bony(x) and Unlimited(x) -> not Cloddish(x)) -> therefore not Cloddish(bruno)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The ardelis is tyrolese. All tyrolese people are profitable. If the ardelis is syncretic and the ardelis is corrective then the ardelis is tyrolese. If someone is corrective then they are carousing. If someone is syncretic and corrective then they are carousing. If someone is profitable then they are carousing. All carousing, syncretic people are tyrolese. If the ardelis is corrective and the ardelis is tyrolese then the ardelis is not carousing. Rough, carousing people are not corrective. The ardelis is corrective.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(ardelis)\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Profitable(x))\nSyncretic(ardelis) and Corrective(ardelis) -> Tyrolese(ardelis)\nforall x (Corrective(x) -> Carousing(x))\nforall x (Syncretic(x) and Corrective(x) -> Carousing(x))\nforall x (Profitable(x) -> Carousing(x))\nforall x (Carousing(x) and Syncretic(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\nCorrective(ardelis) and Tyrolese(ardelis) -> not Carousing(ardelis)\nforall x (Profitable(x) and Carousing(x) -> not Corrective(x))\n\nCorrective(ardelis)\n\nTyrolese(ardelis) and forall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Profitable(x)) -> therefore Profitable(ardelis) Tyrolese(ardelis) and forall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Profitable(x)) -> therefore Profitable(ardelis) Profitable(ardelis) and forall x (Profitable(x) -> Carousing(x)) -> therefore Carousing(ardelis) Profitable(ardelis) and Carousing(ardelis) and forall x (Profitable(x) and Carousing(x) -> not Corrective(x)) -> therefore not Corrective(ardelis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The mina is soaring. All soaring people are mendicant. If the mina is yellowish and the mina is calyceal then the mina is soaring. If someone is calyceal then they are external. If someone is yellowish and calyceal then they are external. If someone is mendicant then they are external. All external, yellowish people are soaring. If the mina is calyceal and the mina is soaring then the mina is not external. Rough, external people are not calyceal. The mina is not yellowish.", "logic": "\nSoaring(mina)\nforall x (Soaring(x) -> Mendicant(x))\nYellowish(mina) and Calyceal(mina) -> Soaring(mina)\nforall x (Calyceal(x) -> External(x))\nforall x (Yellowish(x) and Calyceal(x) -> External(x))\nforall x (Mendicant(x) -> External(x))\nforall x (External(x) and Yellowish(x) -> Soaring(x))\nCalyceal(mina) and Soaring(mina) -> not External(mina)\nforall x (Mendicant(x) and External(x) -> not Calyceal(x))\n\nnot Yellowish(mina)\n\nnot Yellowish(mina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The nolan is ruminative. All ruminative people are nugatory. If the nolan is fizzing and the nolan is lowborn then the nolan is ruminative. If someone is lowborn then they are haggard. If someone is fizzing and lowborn then they are haggard. If someone is nugatory then they are haggard. All haggard, fizzing people are ruminative. If the nolan is lowborn and the nolan is ruminative then the nolan is not haggard. Rough, haggard people are not lowborn. The nolan sees the nolan.", "logic": "\nRuminative(nolan)\nforall x (Ruminative(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nFizzing(nolan) and Lowborn(nolan) -> Ruminative(nolan)\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Fizzing(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Haggard(x) and Fizzing(x) -> Ruminative(x))\nLowborn(nolan) and Ruminative(nolan) -> not Haggard(nolan)\nforall x (Nugatory(x) and Haggard(x) -> not Lowborn(x))\n\nSees(nolan, nolan)\n\nSees(nolan, nolan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The merridie is stressful. All stressful people are effulgent. If the merridie is plethoric and the merridie is caudate then the merridie is stressful. If someone is caudate then they are caecal. If someone is plethoric and caudate then they are caecal. If someone is effulgent then they are caecal. All caecal, plethoric people are stressful. If the merridie is caudate and the merridie is stressful then the merridie is not caecal. Rough, caecal people are not caudate. The merridie does not need the merridie.", "logic": "\nStressful(merridie)\nforall x (Stressful(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nPlethoric(merridie) and Caudate(merridie) -> Stressful(merridie)\nforall x (Caudate(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) and Caudate(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Effulgent(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Stressful(x))\nCaudate(merridie) and Stressful(merridie) -> not Caecal(merridie)\nforall x (Effulgent(x) and Caecal(x) -> not Caudate(x))\n\nnot Needs(merridie, merridie)\n\nnot Needs(merridie, merridie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The gwenn is jihadi. All jihadi people are rattled. If the gwenn is bromidic and the gwenn is caudal then the gwenn is jihadi. If someone is caudal then they are bigamous. If someone is bromidic and caudal then they are bigamous. If someone is rattled then they are bigamous. All bigamous, bromidic people are jihadi. If the gwenn is caudal and the gwenn is jihadi then the gwenn is not bigamous. Rough, bigamous people are not caudal. The gwenn chases the gwenn.", "logic": "\nJihadi(gwenn)\nforall x (Jihadi(x) -> Rattled(x))\nBromidic(gwenn) and Caudal(gwenn) -> Jihadi(gwenn)\nforall x (Caudal(x) -> Bigamous(x))\nforall x (Bromidic(x) and Caudal(x) -> Bigamous(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) -> Bigamous(x))\nforall x (Bigamous(x) and Bromidic(x) -> Jihadi(x))\nCaudal(gwenn) and Jihadi(gwenn) -> not Bigamous(gwenn)\nforall x (Rattled(x) and Bigamous(x) -> not Caudal(x))\n\nChases(gwenn, gwenn)\n\nChases(gwenn, gwenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-499"} {"premises": "The glynn is conjugal. Kind, lost people are filthy. If the glynn is illegal and the glynn is lost then the glynn is conjugal. If someone is croatian then they are illegal. If someone is conjugal then they are illegal. If someone is croatian and conjugal then they are lost. Kind people are croatian. The glynn is conjugal.", "logic": "\nConjugal(glynn)\nforall x (Illegal(x) and Lost(x) -> Filthy(x))\nIllegal(glynn) and Lost(glynn) -> Conjugal(glynn)\nforall x (Croatian(x) -> Illegal(x))\nforall x (Conjugal(x) -> Illegal(x))\nforall x (Croatian(x) and Conjugal(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Illegal(x) -> Croatian(x))\n\nConjugal(glynn)\n\ntherefore Conjugal(glynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The zebulon is canicular. Kind, backward people are fallible. If the zebulon is saudi and the zebulon is backward then the zebulon is canicular. If someone is throated then they are saudi. If someone is canicular then they are saudi. If someone is throated and canicular then they are backward. Kind people are throated. The zebulon is not canicular.", "logic": "\nCanicular(zebulon)\nforall x (Saudi(x) and Backward(x) -> Fallible(x))\nSaudi(zebulon) and Backward(zebulon) -> Canicular(zebulon)\nforall x (Throated(x) -> Saudi(x))\nforall x (Canicular(x) -> Saudi(x))\nforall x (Throated(x) and Canicular(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Saudi(x) -> Throated(x))\n\nnot Canicular(zebulon)\n\ntherefore Canicular(zebulon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The sondra is salacious. Kind, converted people are cxlv. If the sondra is scurrilous and the sondra is converted then the sondra is salacious. If someone is calyptrate then they are scurrilous. If someone is salacious then they are scurrilous. If someone is calyptrate and salacious then they are converted. Kind people are calyptrate. The sondra is scurrilous.", "logic": "\nSalacious(sondra)\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) and Converted(x) -> Cxlv(x))\nScurrilous(sondra) and Converted(sondra) -> Salacious(sondra)\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Salacious(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) and Salacious(x) -> Converted(x))\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) -> Calyptrate(x))\n\nScurrilous(sondra)\n\nSalacious(sondra) and forall x (Salacious(x) -> Scurrilous(x)) -> therefore Scurrilous(sondra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The nata is helpful. Kind, ensuant people are torturing. If the nata is broody and the nata is ensuant then the nata is helpful. If someone is loath then they are broody. If someone is helpful then they are broody. If someone is loath and helpful then they are ensuant. Kind people are loath. The nata is not broody.", "logic": "\nHelpful(nata)\nforall x (Broody(x) and Ensuant(x) -> Torturing(x))\nBroody(nata) and Ensuant(nata) -> Helpful(nata)\nforall x (Loath(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Helpful(x) -> Broody(x))\nforall x (Loath(x) and Helpful(x) -> Ensuant(x))\nforall x (Broody(x) -> Loath(x))\n\nnot Broody(nata)\n\nHelpful(nata) and forall x (Helpful(x) -> Broody(x)) -> therefore Broody(nata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The chrysler is unguarded. Kind, albescent people are superior. If the chrysler is infrequent and the chrysler is albescent then the chrysler is unguarded. If someone is regulative then they are infrequent. If someone is unguarded then they are infrequent. If someone is regulative and unguarded then they are albescent. Kind people are regulative. The chrysler is regulative.", "logic": "\nUnguarded(chrysler)\nforall x (Infrequent(x) and Albescent(x) -> Superior(x))\nInfrequent(chrysler) and Albescent(chrysler) -> Unguarded(chrysler)\nforall x (Regulative(x) -> Infrequent(x))\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Infrequent(x))\nforall x (Regulative(x) and Unguarded(x) -> Albescent(x))\nforall x (Infrequent(x) -> Regulative(x))\n\nRegulative(chrysler)\n\nUnguarded(chrysler) and forall x (Unguarded(x) -> Infrequent(x)) -> therefore Infrequent(chrysler) Infrequent(chrysler) and forall x (Infrequent(x) -> Regulative(x)) -> therefore Regulative(chrysler)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The gates is lubberly. Kind, felonious people are tibetan. If the gates is managerial and the gates is felonious then the gates is lubberly. If someone is puzzling then they are managerial. If someone is lubberly then they are managerial. If someone is puzzling and lubberly then they are felonious. Kind people are puzzling. The gates is not puzzling.", "logic": "\nLubberly(gates)\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Felonious(x) -> Tibetan(x))\nManagerial(gates) and Felonious(gates) -> Lubberly(gates)\nforall x (Puzzling(x) -> Managerial(x))\nforall x (Lubberly(x) -> Managerial(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Felonious(x))\nforall x (Managerial(x) -> Puzzling(x))\n\nnot Puzzling(gates)\n\nLubberly(gates) and forall x (Lubberly(x) -> Managerial(x)) -> therefore Managerial(gates) Managerial(gates) and forall x (Managerial(x) -> Puzzling(x)) -> therefore Puzzling(gates)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The tyne is unchecked. Kind, ahorse people are maximal. If the tyne is varied and the tyne is ahorse then the tyne is unchecked. If someone is submerged then they are varied. If someone is unchecked then they are varied. If someone is submerged and unchecked then they are ahorse. Kind people are submerged. The tyne is ahorse.", "logic": "\nUnchecked(tyne)\nforall x (Varied(x) and Ahorse(x) -> Maximal(x))\nVaried(tyne) and Ahorse(tyne) -> Unchecked(tyne)\nforall x (Submerged(x) -> Varied(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) -> Varied(x))\nforall x (Submerged(x) and Unchecked(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Varied(x) -> Submerged(x))\n\nAhorse(tyne)\n\nUnchecked(tyne) and forall x (Unchecked(x) -> Varied(x)) -> therefore Varied(tyne) Varied(tyne) and forall x (Varied(x) -> Submerged(x)) -> therefore Submerged(tyne) Submerged(tyne) and Unchecked(tyne) and forall x (Submerged(x) and Unchecked(x) -> Ahorse(x)) -> therefore Ahorse(tyne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The woody is brimming. Kind, overmuch people are myelinic. If the woody is placable and the woody is overmuch then the woody is brimming. If someone is unfearing then they are placable. If someone is brimming then they are placable. If someone is unfearing and brimming then they are overmuch. Kind people are unfearing. The woody is not overmuch.", "logic": "\nBrimming(woody)\nforall x (Placable(x) and Overmuch(x) -> Myelinic(x))\nPlacable(woody) and Overmuch(woody) -> Brimming(woody)\nforall x (Unfearing(x) -> Placable(x))\nforall x (Brimming(x) -> Placable(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Brimming(x) -> Overmuch(x))\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Unfearing(x))\n\nnot Overmuch(woody)\n\nBrimming(woody) and forall x (Brimming(x) -> Placable(x)) -> therefore Placable(woody) Placable(woody) and forall x (Placable(x) -> Unfearing(x)) -> therefore Unfearing(woody) Unfearing(woody) and Brimming(woody) and forall x (Unfearing(x) and Brimming(x) -> Overmuch(x)) -> therefore Overmuch(woody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The herb is tentacular. Kind, vesicatory people are deskbound. If the herb is campanular and the herb is vesicatory then the herb is tentacular. If someone is iritic then they are campanular. If someone is tentacular then they are campanular. If someone is iritic and tentacular then they are vesicatory. Kind people are iritic. The herb does not like the herb.", "logic": "\nTentacular(herb)\nforall x (Campanular(x) and Vesicatory(x) -> Deskbound(x))\nCampanular(herb) and Vesicatory(herb) -> Tentacular(herb)\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Campanular(x))\nforall x (Tentacular(x) -> Campanular(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) and Tentacular(x) -> Vesicatory(x))\nforall x (Campanular(x) -> Iritic(x))\n\nnot Likes(herb, herb)\n\nnot Likes(herb, herb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The jeni is handsewn. Kind, hedged people are factorial. If the jeni is spongelike and the jeni is hedged then the jeni is handsewn. If someone is aflicker then they are spongelike. If someone is handsewn then they are spongelike. If someone is aflicker and handsewn then they are hedged. Kind people are aflicker. The jeni visits the jeni.", "logic": "\nHandsewn(jeni)\nforall x (Spongelike(x) and Hedged(x) -> Factorial(x))\nSpongelike(jeni) and Hedged(jeni) -> Handsewn(jeni)\nforall x (Aflicker(x) -> Spongelike(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) -> Spongelike(x))\nforall x (Aflicker(x) and Handsewn(x) -> Hedged(x))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) -> Aflicker(x))\n\nVisits(jeni, jeni)\n\nVisits(jeni, jeni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-497"} {"premises": "The spike skirmish the jandy. The jandy is benefic. The abdel skirmish the jandy. The joann obtain the jandy. If the spike itemize the jandy and the jandy itemize the spike then the spike obtain the abdel. If someone itemize the joann then the joann obtain the spike. If someone skirmish the jandy then the jandy skirmish the joann. If the abdel obtain the spike and the spike itemize the abdel then the spike is uncoerced. All passive people are uncoerced. If someone is benefic then they eat the jandy. All passive people are maltreated. If someone skirmish the joann and the joann is passive then the joann itemize the jandy. The spike skirmish the jandy.", "logic": "\nSkirmish(spike, jandy)\nBenefic(jandy)\nSkirmish(abdel, jandy)\nObtain(joann, jandy)\nItemize(spike, jandy) and Itemize(jandy, spike) -> Obtain(spike, abdel)\nforall x (Itemize(x, joann) -> Obtain(joann, spike))\nforall x (Skirmish(x, jandy) -> Skirmish(jandy, joann))\nObtain(abdel, spike) and Itemize(spike, abdel) -> Uncoerced(spike)\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Benefic(x) -> Itemize(x, jandy))\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nforall x (Skirmish(x, joann) and Passive(joann) -> Itemize(joann, jandy))\n\nSkirmish(spike, jandy)\n\ntherefore Skirmish(spike, jandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "The dotti mire the conny. The conny is acanthous. The romona mire the conny. The grethel rehear the conny. If the dotti correspond the conny and the conny correspond the dotti then the dotti rehear the romona. If someone correspond the grethel then the grethel rehear the dotti. If someone mire the conny then the conny mire the grethel. If the romona rehear the dotti and the dotti correspond the romona then the dotti is impersonal. All autologous people are impersonal. If someone is acanthous then they eat the conny. All autologous people are vermillion. If someone mire the grethel and the grethel is autologous then the grethel correspond the conny. The romona does not like the conny.", "logic": "\nMire(dotti, conny)\nAcanthous(conny)\nMire(romona, conny)\nRehear(grethel, conny)\nCorrespond(dotti, conny) and Correspond(conny, dotti) -> Rehear(dotti, romona)\nforall x (Correspond(x, grethel) -> Rehear(grethel, dotti))\nforall x (Mire(x, conny) -> Mire(conny, grethel))\nRehear(romona, dotti) and Correspond(dotti, romona) -> Impersonal(dotti)\nforall x (Autologous(x) -> Impersonal(x))\nforall x (Acanthous(x) -> Correspond(x, conny))\nforall x (Autologous(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Mire(x, grethel) and Autologous(grethel) -> Correspond(grethel, conny))\n\nnot Mire(romona, conny)\n\ntherefore Mire(romona, conny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "The rebeca controvert the elianora. The elianora is unresolved. The conney controvert the elianora. The mair grunt the elianora. If the rebeca encourage the elianora and the elianora encourage the rebeca then the rebeca grunt the conney. If someone encourage the mair then the mair grunt the rebeca. If someone controvert the elianora then the elianora controvert the mair. If the conney grunt the rebeca and the rebeca encourage the conney then the rebeca is passive. All exhaustive people are passive. If someone is unresolved then they eat the elianora. All exhaustive people are homebound. If someone controvert the mair and the mair is exhaustive then the mair encourage the elianora. The elianora controvert the mair.", "logic": "\nControvert(rebeca, elianora)\nUnresolved(elianora)\nControvert(conney, elianora)\nGrunt(mair, elianora)\nEncourage(rebeca, elianora) and Encourage(elianora, rebeca) -> Grunt(rebeca, conney)\nforall x (Encourage(x, mair) -> Grunt(mair, rebeca))\nforall x (Controvert(x, elianora) -> Controvert(elianora, mair))\nGrunt(conney, rebeca) and Encourage(rebeca, conney) -> Passive(rebeca)\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Passive(x))\nforall x (Unresolved(x) -> Encourage(x, elianora))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Homebound(x))\nforall x (Controvert(x, mair) and Exhaustive(mair) -> Encourage(mair, elianora))\n\nControvert(elianora, mair)\n\nControvert(rebeca, elianora) and forall x (Controvert(x, elianora) -> Controvert(elianora, mair)) -> therefore Controvert(elianora, mair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "The val latch the cally. The cally is boxy. The danella latch the cally. The cissie reverse the cally. If the val anneal the cally and the cally anneal the val then the val reverse the danella. If someone anneal the cissie then the cissie reverse the val. If someone latch the cally then the cally latch the cissie. If the danella reverse the val and the val anneal the danella then the val is romansh. All benumbed people are romansh. If someone is boxy then they eat the cally. All benumbed people are haematic. If someone latch the cissie and the cissie is benumbed then the cissie anneal the cally. The cally does not like the cissie.", "logic": "\nLatch(val, cally)\nBoxy(cally)\nLatch(danella, cally)\nReverse(cissie, cally)\nAnneal(val, cally) and Anneal(cally, val) -> Reverse(val, danella)\nforall x (Anneal(x, cissie) -> Reverse(cissie, val))\nforall x (Latch(x, cally) -> Latch(cally, cissie))\nReverse(danella, val) and Anneal(val, danella) -> Romansh(val)\nforall x (Benumbed(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Anneal(x, cally))\nforall x (Benumbed(x) -> Haematic(x))\nforall x (Latch(x, cissie) and Benumbed(cissie) -> Anneal(cissie, cally))\n\nnot Latch(cally, cissie)\n\nLatch(val, cally) and forall x (Latch(x, cally) -> Latch(cally, cissie)) -> therefore Latch(cally, cissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "The devina splinter the harvey. The harvey is skew. The morten splinter the harvey. The orbadiah rupture the harvey. If the devina report the harvey and the harvey report the devina then the devina rupture the morten. If someone report the orbadiah then the orbadiah rupture the devina. If someone splinter the harvey then the harvey splinter the orbadiah. If the morten rupture the devina and the devina report the morten then the devina is magnetic. All papist people are magnetic. If someone is skew then they eat the harvey. All papist people are unwieldy. If someone splinter the orbadiah and the orbadiah is papist then the orbadiah report the harvey. The harvey is not magnetic.", "logic": "\nSplinter(devina, harvey)\nSkew(harvey)\nSplinter(morten, harvey)\nRupture(orbadiah, harvey)\nReport(devina, harvey) and Report(harvey, devina) -> Rupture(devina, morten)\nforall x (Report(x, orbadiah) -> Rupture(orbadiah, devina))\nforall x (Splinter(x, harvey) -> Splinter(harvey, orbadiah))\nRupture(morten, devina) and Report(devina, morten) -> Magnetic(devina)\nforall x (Papist(x) -> Magnetic(x))\nforall x (Skew(x) -> Report(x, harvey))\nforall x (Papist(x) -> Unwieldy(x))\nforall x (Splinter(x, orbadiah) and Papist(orbadiah) -> Report(orbadiah, harvey))\n\nnot Magnetic(harvey)\n\nforall x (Papist(x) -> Magnetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "The shandy sieve the nikita. The nikita is xxii. The stirling sieve the nikita. The marj razor the nikita. If the shandy commutate the nikita and the nikita commutate the shandy then the shandy razor the stirling. If someone commutate the marj then the marj razor the shandy. If someone sieve the nikita then the nikita sieve the marj. If the stirling razor the shandy and the shandy commutate the stirling then the shandy is nonsocial. All adagio people are nonsocial. If someone is xxii then they eat the nikita. All adagio people are lobar. If someone sieve the marj and the marj is adagio then the marj commutate the nikita. The marj is nonsocial.", "logic": "\nSieve(shandy, nikita)\nXxii(nikita)\nSieve(stirling, nikita)\nRazor(marj, nikita)\nCommutate(shandy, nikita) and Commutate(nikita, shandy) -> Razor(shandy, stirling)\nforall x (Commutate(x, marj) -> Razor(marj, shandy))\nforall x (Sieve(x, nikita) -> Sieve(nikita, marj))\nRazor(stirling, shandy) and Commutate(shandy, stirling) -> Nonsocial(shandy)\nforall x (Adagio(x) -> Nonsocial(x))\nforall x (Xxii(x) -> Commutate(x, nikita))\nforall x (Adagio(x) -> Lobar(x))\nforall x (Sieve(x, marj) and Adagio(marj) -> Commutate(marj, nikita))\n\nNonsocial(marj)\n\nforall x (Adagio(x) -> Nonsocial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "The angelita redevelop the ardis. The ardis is unfading. The wilfrid redevelop the ardis. The prisca meditate the ardis. If the angelita reacquaint the ardis and the ardis reacquaint the angelita then the angelita meditate the wilfrid. If someone reacquaint the prisca then the prisca meditate the angelita. If someone redevelop the ardis then the ardis redevelop the prisca. If the wilfrid meditate the angelita and the angelita reacquaint the wilfrid then the angelita is hourly. All guardant people are hourly. If someone is unfading then they eat the ardis. All guardant people are apoplectic. If someone redevelop the prisca and the prisca is guardant then the prisca reacquaint the ardis. The angelita is not green.", "logic": "\nRedevelop(angelita, ardis)\nUnfading(ardis)\nRedevelop(wilfrid, ardis)\nMeditate(prisca, ardis)\nReacquaint(angelita, ardis) and Reacquaint(ardis, angelita) -> Meditate(angelita, wilfrid)\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, prisca) -> Meditate(prisca, angelita))\nforall x (Redevelop(x, ardis) -> Redevelop(ardis, prisca))\nMeditate(wilfrid, angelita) and Reacquaint(angelita, wilfrid) -> Hourly(angelita)\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Hourly(x))\nforall x (Unfading(x) -> Reacquaint(x, ardis))\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Apoplectic(x))\nforall x (Redevelop(x, prisca) and Guardant(prisca) -> Reacquaint(prisca, ardis))\n\nnot Green(angelita)\n\nnot Green(angelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "The anatole piggyback the celestina. The celestina is tapered. The kial piggyback the celestina. The nicol reify the celestina. If the anatole grizzle the celestina and the celestina grizzle the anatole then the anatole reify the kial. If someone grizzle the nicol then the nicol reify the anatole. If someone piggyback the celestina then the celestina piggyback the nicol. If the kial reify the anatole and the anatole grizzle the kial then the anatole is apodal. All novel people are apodal. If someone is tapered then they eat the celestina. All novel people are unpermed. If someone piggyback the nicol and the nicol is novel then the nicol grizzle the celestina. The anatole piggyback the kial.", "logic": "\nPiggyback(anatole, celestina)\nTapered(celestina)\nPiggyback(kial, celestina)\nReify(nicol, celestina)\nGrizzle(anatole, celestina) and Grizzle(celestina, anatole) -> Reify(anatole, kial)\nforall x (Grizzle(x, nicol) -> Reify(nicol, anatole))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, celestina) -> Piggyback(celestina, nicol))\nReify(kial, anatole) and Grizzle(anatole, kial) -> Apodal(anatole)\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Apodal(x))\nforall x (Tapered(x) -> Grizzle(x, celestina))\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Unpermed(x))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, nicol) and Novel(nicol) -> Grizzle(nicol, celestina))\n\nPiggyback(anatole, kial)\n\nPiggyback(anatole, kial) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-81"} {"premises": "Warner is eupneic. Warner is parthian. Warner is inner. Warner is beady. Warner is unlatched. Magna is seasick. Sarah is inner. Sarah is beady. Sarah is unlatched. Aamir is parthian. Aamir is inner. Aamir is unlatched. If Sarah is beady then Sarah is parthian. If Warner is seasick then Warner is unlatched. If Sarah is unlatched and Sarah is pretended then Sarah is eupneic. All beady, inner things are eupneic. If something is eupneic then it is seasick. All eupneic, inner things are seasick. Kind things are beady. All eupneic things are parthian. Aamir is inner.", "logic": "\nEupneic(warner)\nParthian(warner)\nInner(warner)\nBeady(warner)\nUnlatched(warner)\nSeasick(magna)\nInner(sarah)\nBeady(sarah)\nUnlatched(sarah)\nParthian(aamir)\nInner(aamir)\nUnlatched(aamir)\nBeady(sarah) -> Parthian(sarah)\nSeasick(warner) -> Unlatched(warner)\nUnlatched(sarah) and Pretended(sarah) -> Eupneic(sarah)\nforall x (Beady(x) and Inner(x) -> Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Eupneic(x) -> Seasick(x))\nforall x (Eupneic(x) and Inner(x) -> Seasick(x))\nforall x (Inner(x) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Eupneic(x) -> Parthian(x))\n\nInner(aamir)\n\ntherefore Inner(aamir)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Jeanette is octuple. Jeanette is bronzy. Jeanette is aftermost. Jeanette is metalloid. Jeanette is positional. Demetre is licensed. Fonsie is aftermost. Fonsie is metalloid. Fonsie is positional. Douglas is bronzy. Douglas is aftermost. Douglas is positional. If Fonsie is metalloid then Fonsie is bronzy. If Jeanette is licensed then Jeanette is positional. If Fonsie is positional and Fonsie is sleepy then Fonsie is octuple. All metalloid, aftermost things are octuple. If something is octuple then it is licensed. All octuple, aftermost things are licensed. Kind things are metalloid. All octuple things are bronzy. Douglas is not positional.", "logic": "\nOctuple(jeanette)\nBronzy(jeanette)\nAftermost(jeanette)\nMetalloid(jeanette)\nPositional(jeanette)\nLicensed(demetre)\nAftermost(fonsie)\nMetalloid(fonsie)\nPositional(fonsie)\nBronzy(douglas)\nAftermost(douglas)\nPositional(douglas)\nMetalloid(fonsie) -> Bronzy(fonsie)\nLicensed(jeanette) -> Positional(jeanette)\nPositional(fonsie) and Sleepy(fonsie) -> Octuple(fonsie)\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Aftermost(x) -> Octuple(x))\nforall x (Octuple(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Octuple(x) and Aftermost(x) -> Licensed(x))\nforall x (Aftermost(x) -> Metalloid(x))\nforall x (Octuple(x) -> Bronzy(x))\n\nnot Positional(douglas)\n\ntherefore Positional(douglas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Tessi is stenotic. Tessi is honored. Tessi is ceramic. Tessi is touchy. Tessi is vindictive. Gae is jolted. Keriann is ceramic. Keriann is touchy. Keriann is vindictive. Ashlie is honored. Ashlie is ceramic. Ashlie is vindictive. If Keriann is touchy then Keriann is honored. If Tessi is jolted then Tessi is vindictive. If Keriann is vindictive and Keriann is amorous then Keriann is stenotic. All touchy, ceramic things are stenotic. If something is stenotic then it is jolted. All stenotic, ceramic things are jolted. Kind things are touchy. All stenotic things are honored. Ashlie is touchy.", "logic": "\nStenotic(tessi)\nHonored(tessi)\nCeramic(tessi)\nTouchy(tessi)\nVindictive(tessi)\nJolted(gae)\nCeramic(keriann)\nTouchy(keriann)\nVindictive(keriann)\nHonored(ashlie)\nCeramic(ashlie)\nVindictive(ashlie)\nTouchy(keriann) -> Honored(keriann)\nJolted(tessi) -> Vindictive(tessi)\nVindictive(keriann) and Amorous(keriann) -> Stenotic(keriann)\nforall x (Touchy(x) and Ceramic(x) -> Stenotic(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) -> Jolted(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and Ceramic(x) -> Jolted(x))\nforall x (Ceramic(x) -> Touchy(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) -> Honored(x))\n\nTouchy(ashlie)\n\nCeramic(ashlie) and forall x (Ceramic(x) -> Touchy(x)) -> therefore Touchy(ashlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Brit is organic. Brit is anoxic. Brit is paradisiac. Brit is toed. Brit is amused. Elyn is pinnate. Turner is paradisiac. Turner is toed. Turner is amused. Sally is anoxic. Sally is paradisiac. Sally is amused. If Turner is toed then Turner is anoxic. If Brit is pinnate then Brit is amused. If Turner is amused and Turner is unwearable then Turner is organic. All toed, paradisiac things are organic. If something is organic then it is pinnate. All organic, paradisiac things are pinnate. Kind things are toed. All organic things are anoxic. Sally is not toed.", "logic": "\nOrganic(brit)\nAnoxic(brit)\nParadisiac(brit)\nToed(brit)\nAmused(brit)\nPinnate(elyn)\nParadisiac(turner)\nToed(turner)\nAmused(turner)\nAnoxic(sally)\nParadisiac(sally)\nAmused(sally)\nToed(turner) -> Anoxic(turner)\nPinnate(brit) -> Amused(brit)\nAmused(turner) and Unwearable(turner) -> Organic(turner)\nforall x (Toed(x) and Paradisiac(x) -> Organic(x))\nforall x (Organic(x) -> Pinnate(x))\nforall x (Organic(x) and Paradisiac(x) -> Pinnate(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) -> Toed(x))\nforall x (Organic(x) -> Anoxic(x))\n\nnot Toed(sally)\n\nParadisiac(sally) and forall x (Paradisiac(x) -> Toed(x)) -> therefore Toed(sally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Byram is drab. Byram is maniac. Byram is mantled. Byram is harsh. Byram is guiltless. Karla is actinic. Mario is mantled. Mario is harsh. Mario is guiltless. Herman is maniac. Herman is mantled. Herman is guiltless. If Mario is harsh then Mario is maniac. If Byram is actinic then Byram is guiltless. If Mario is guiltless and Mario is roily then Mario is drab. All harsh, mantled things are drab. If something is drab then it is actinic. All drab, mantled things are actinic. Kind things are harsh. All drab things are maniac. Karla is not harsh.", "logic": "\nDrab(byram)\nManiac(byram)\nMantled(byram)\nHarsh(byram)\nGuiltless(byram)\nActinic(karla)\nMantled(mario)\nHarsh(mario)\nGuiltless(mario)\nManiac(herman)\nMantled(herman)\nGuiltless(herman)\nHarsh(mario) -> Maniac(mario)\nActinic(byram) -> Guiltless(byram)\nGuiltless(mario) and Roily(mario) -> Drab(mario)\nforall x (Harsh(x) and Mantled(x) -> Drab(x))\nforall x (Drab(x) -> Actinic(x))\nforall x (Drab(x) and Mantled(x) -> Actinic(x))\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Harsh(x))\nforall x (Drab(x) -> Maniac(x))\n\nnot Harsh(karla)\n\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Harsh(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Adelice is serbian. Adelice is wintery. Adelice is lumpen. Adelice is lipotropic. Adelice is laciniate. Carola is vexatious. Johny is lumpen. Johny is lipotropic. Johny is laciniate. Stern is wintery. Stern is lumpen. Stern is laciniate. If Johny is lipotropic then Johny is wintery. If Adelice is vexatious then Adelice is laciniate. If Johny is laciniate and Johny is both then Johny is serbian. All lipotropic, lumpen things are serbian. If something is serbian then it is vexatious. All serbian, lumpen things are vexatious. Kind things are lipotropic. All serbian things are wintery. Carola is serbian.", "logic": "\nSerbian(adelice)\nWintery(adelice)\nLumpen(adelice)\nLipotropic(adelice)\nLaciniate(adelice)\nVexatious(carola)\nLumpen(johny)\nLipotropic(johny)\nLaciniate(johny)\nWintery(stern)\nLumpen(stern)\nLaciniate(stern)\nLipotropic(johny) -> Wintery(johny)\nVexatious(adelice) -> Laciniate(adelice)\nLaciniate(johny) and Both(johny) -> Serbian(johny)\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) and Lumpen(x) -> Serbian(x))\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Serbian(x) and Lumpen(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Lumpen(x) -> Lipotropic(x))\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Wintery(x))\n\nSerbian(carola)\n\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) and Lumpen(x) -> Serbian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Maddy is male. Maddy is offending. Maddy is slopped. Maddy is hyaloid. Maddy is canary. Laney is printable. Davy is slopped. Davy is hyaloid. Davy is canary. Bridget is offending. Bridget is slopped. Bridget is canary. If Davy is hyaloid then Davy is offending. If Maddy is printable then Maddy is canary. If Davy is canary and Davy is huddled then Davy is male. All hyaloid, slopped things are male. If something is male then it is printable. All male, slopped things are printable. Kind things are hyaloid. All male things are offending. Laney is not canary.", "logic": "\nMale(maddy)\nOffending(maddy)\nSlopped(maddy)\nHyaloid(maddy)\nCanary(maddy)\nPrintable(laney)\nSlopped(davy)\nHyaloid(davy)\nCanary(davy)\nOffending(bridget)\nSlopped(bridget)\nCanary(bridget)\nHyaloid(davy) -> Offending(davy)\nPrintable(maddy) -> Canary(maddy)\nCanary(davy) and Huddled(davy) -> Male(davy)\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Slopped(x) -> Male(x))\nforall x (Male(x) -> Printable(x))\nforall x (Male(x) and Slopped(x) -> Printable(x))\nforall x (Slopped(x) -> Hyaloid(x))\nforall x (Male(x) -> Offending(x))\n\nnot Canary(laney)\n\nnot Canary(laney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Sibyl is abient. Sibyl is outflowing. Sibyl is cosmogenic. Sibyl is tenebrific. Sibyl is ninety. Lust is czarist. Mikey is cosmogenic. Mikey is tenebrific. Mikey is ninety. Jobie is outflowing. Jobie is cosmogenic. Jobie is ninety. If Mikey is tenebrific then Mikey is outflowing. If Sibyl is czarist then Sibyl is ninety. If Mikey is ninety and Mikey is ferocious then Mikey is abient. All tenebrific, cosmogenic things are abient. If something is abient then it is czarist. All abient, cosmogenic things are czarist. Kind things are tenebrific. All abient things are outflowing. Sibyl is ferocious.", "logic": "\nAbient(sibyl)\nOutflowing(sibyl)\nCosmogenic(sibyl)\nTenebrific(sibyl)\nNinety(sibyl)\nCzarist(lust)\nCosmogenic(mikey)\nTenebrific(mikey)\nNinety(mikey)\nOutflowing(jobie)\nCosmogenic(jobie)\nNinety(jobie)\nTenebrific(mikey) -> Outflowing(mikey)\nCzarist(sibyl) -> Ninety(sibyl)\nNinety(mikey) and Ferocious(mikey) -> Abient(mikey)\nforall x (Tenebrific(x) and Cosmogenic(x) -> Abient(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) and Cosmogenic(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Cosmogenic(x) -> Tenebrific(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) -> Outflowing(x))\n\nFerocious(sibyl)\n\nFerocious(sibyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2436"} {"premises": "Annemarie is pleonastic. Big, dehiscent things are not pleonastic. If something is pleonastic then it is dehiscent. If something is dehiscent and carthusian then it is everyday. All subclavian things are not even. All dehiscent things are subclavian. If something is pleonastic and not everyday then it is not subclavian. Annemarie is pleonastic.", "logic": "\nPleonastic(annemarie)\nforall x (Everyday(x) and Dehiscent(x) -> not Pleonastic(x))\nforall x (Pleonastic(x) -> Dehiscent(x))\nforall x (Dehiscent(x) and Carthusian(x) -> Everyday(x))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) -> not Even(x))\nforall x (Dehiscent(x) -> Subclavian(x))\nforall x (Pleonastic(x) and not Everyday(x) -> not Subclavian(x))\n\nPleonastic(annemarie)\n\ntherefore Pleonastic(annemarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Thedric is clanging. Big, plumbic things are not clanging. If something is clanging then it is plumbic. If something is plumbic and upbound then it is unthankful. All nurtural things are not starboard. All plumbic things are nurtural. If something is clanging and not unthankful then it is not nurtural. Thedric is not clanging.", "logic": "\nClanging(thedric)\nforall x (Unthankful(x) and Plumbic(x) -> not Clanging(x))\nforall x (Clanging(x) -> Plumbic(x))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) and Upbound(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Nurtural(x) -> not Starboard(x))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Clanging(x) and not Unthankful(x) -> not Nurtural(x))\n\nnot Clanging(thedric)\n\ntherefore Clanging(thedric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Rutger is chemical. Big, homing things are not chemical. If something is chemical then it is homing. If something is homing and undefended then it is combed. All unwilling things are not salt. All homing things are unwilling. If something is chemical and not combed then it is not unwilling. Rutger is homing.", "logic": "\nChemical(rutger)\nforall x (Combed(x) and Homing(x) -> not Chemical(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Homing(x) and Undefended(x) -> Combed(x))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) -> not Salt(x))\nforall x (Homing(x) -> Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) and not Combed(x) -> not Unwilling(x))\n\nHoming(rutger)\n\nChemical(rutger) and forall x (Chemical(x) -> Homing(x)) -> therefore Homing(rutger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Jewell is nominal. Big, sublunar things are not nominal. If something is nominal then it is sublunar. If something is sublunar and voluntary then it is mithraic. All exposed things are not comose. All sublunar things are exposed. If something is nominal and not mithraic then it is not exposed. Jewell is not sublunar.", "logic": "\nNominal(jewell)\nforall x (Mithraic(x) and Sublunar(x) -> not Nominal(x))\nforall x (Nominal(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) and Voluntary(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> not Comose(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) -> Exposed(x))\nforall x (Nominal(x) and not Mithraic(x) -> not Exposed(x))\n\nnot Sublunar(jewell)\n\nNominal(jewell) and forall x (Nominal(x) -> Sublunar(x)) -> therefore Sublunar(jewell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Camellia is nauseous. Big, brazen things are not nauseous. If something is nauseous then it is brazen. If something is brazen and mercerized then it is isthmian. All piagetian things are not megalithic. All brazen things are piagetian. If something is nauseous and not isthmian then it is not piagetian. Camellia is piagetian.", "logic": "\nNauseous(camellia)\nforall x (Isthmian(x) and Brazen(x) -> not Nauseous(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Brazen(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x) and Mercerized(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nforall x (Piagetian(x) -> not Megalithic(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Piagetian(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) and not Isthmian(x) -> not Piagetian(x))\n\nPiagetian(camellia)\n\nNauseous(camellia) and forall x (Nauseous(x) -> Brazen(x)) -> therefore Brazen(camellia) Brazen(camellia) and forall x (Brazen(x) -> Piagetian(x)) -> therefore Piagetian(camellia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Silvio is potbellied. Big, blase things are not potbellied. If something is potbellied then it is blase. If something is blase and bubaline then it is beginning. All bantering things are not violent. All blase things are bantering. If something is potbellied and not beginning then it is not bantering. Silvio is not bantering.", "logic": "\nPotbellied(silvio)\nforall x (Beginning(x) and Blase(x) -> not Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Potbellied(x) -> Blase(x))\nforall x (Blase(x) and Bubaline(x) -> Beginning(x))\nforall x (Bantering(x) -> not Violent(x))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Bantering(x))\nforall x (Potbellied(x) and not Beginning(x) -> not Bantering(x))\n\nnot Bantering(silvio)\n\nPotbellied(silvio) and forall x (Potbellied(x) -> Blase(x)) -> therefore Blase(silvio) Blase(silvio) and forall x (Blase(x) -> Bantering(x)) -> therefore Bantering(silvio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Everard is staple. Big, finespun things are not staple. If something is staple then it is finespun. If something is finespun and punitory then it is citywide. All marital things are not topologic. All finespun things are marital. If something is staple and not citywide then it is not marital. Everard is not topologic.", "logic": "\nStaple(everard)\nforall x (Citywide(x) and Finespun(x) -> not Staple(x))\nforall x (Staple(x) -> Finespun(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) and Punitory(x) -> Citywide(x))\nforall x (Marital(x) -> not Topologic(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Staple(x) and not Citywide(x) -> not Marital(x))\n\nnot Topologic(everard)\n\nStaple(everard) and forall x (Staple(x) -> Finespun(x)) -> therefore Finespun(everard) Finespun(everard) and forall x (Finespun(x) -> Marital(x)) -> therefore Marital(everard) Marital(everard) and forall x (Marital(x) -> not Topologic(x)) -> therefore not Topologic(everard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Wyatan is unthought. Big, tenured things are not unthought. If something is unthought then it is tenured. If something is tenured and myopic then it is cambrian. All troubling things are not rustproof. All tenured things are troubling. If something is unthought and not cambrian then it is not troubling. Wyatan is rustproof.", "logic": "\nUnthought(wyatan)\nforall x (Cambrian(x) and Tenured(x) -> not Unthought(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Tenured(x))\nforall x (Tenured(x) and Myopic(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Troubling(x) -> not Rustproof(x))\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Troubling(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) and not Cambrian(x) -> not Troubling(x))\n\nRustproof(wyatan)\n\nUnthought(wyatan) and forall x (Unthought(x) -> Tenured(x)) -> therefore Tenured(wyatan) Tenured(wyatan) and forall x (Tenured(x) -> Troubling(x)) -> therefore Troubling(wyatan) Troubling(wyatan) and forall x (Troubling(x) -> not Rustproof(x)) -> therefore not Rustproof(wyatan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Caroljean is energising. Big, lotic things are not energising. If something is energising then it is lotic. If something is lotic and turkmen then it is rebellious. All autumnal things are not draggled. All lotic things are autumnal. If something is energising and not rebellious then it is not autumnal. Caroljean is not rebellious.", "logic": "\nEnergising(caroljean)\nforall x (Rebellious(x) and Lotic(x) -> not Energising(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) and Turkmen(x) -> Rebellious(x))\nforall x (Autumnal(x) -> not Draggled(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) and not Rebellious(x) -> not Autumnal(x))\n\nnot Rebellious(caroljean)\n\nforall x (Lotic(x) and Turkmen(x) -> Rebellious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Lory is earthly. Big, stable things are not earthly. If something is earthly then it is stable. If something is stable and packable then it is fetid. All exhausted things are not catapultic. All stable things are exhausted. If something is earthly and not fetid then it is not exhausted. Lory is packable.", "logic": "\nEarthly(lory)\nforall x (Fetid(x) and Stable(x) -> not Earthly(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) -> Stable(x))\nforall x (Stable(x) and Packable(x) -> Fetid(x))\nforall x (Exhausted(x) -> not Catapultic(x))\nforall x (Stable(x) -> Exhausted(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) and not Fetid(x) -> not Exhausted(x))\n\nPackable(lory)\n\nPackable(lory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1730"} {"premises": "Vin is pardonable. Rory is eventful. Nadiya is housebound. Round things are eventful. If Vin is sniffly then Vin is pinioned. If something is housebound and forensic then it is eventful. If something is housebound then it is pinioned. Blue, housebound things are crippling. If something is crippling then it is sniffly. Blue, eventful things are pardonable. All pardonable, sniffly things are housebound. Nadiya is housebound.", "logic": "\nPardonable(vin)\nEventful(rory)\nHousebound(nadiya)\nforall x (Forensic(x) -> Eventful(x))\nSniffly(vin) -> Pinioned(vin)\nforall x (Housebound(x) and Forensic(x) -> Eventful(x))\nforall x (Housebound(x) -> Pinioned(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) and Housebound(x) -> Crippling(x))\nforall x (Crippling(x) -> Sniffly(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) and Eventful(x) -> Pardonable(x))\nforall x (Pardonable(x) and Sniffly(x) -> Housebound(x))\n\nHousebound(nadiya)\n\ntherefore Housebound(nadiya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Zorine is cervine. Rutledge is clouded. Nahum is princely. Round things are clouded. If Zorine is anabolic then Zorine is autoerotic. If something is princely and finite then it is clouded. If something is princely then it is autoerotic. Blue, princely things are limbic. If something is limbic then it is anabolic. Blue, clouded things are cervine. All cervine, anabolic things are princely. Zorine is not cervine.", "logic": "\nCervine(zorine)\nClouded(rutledge)\nPrincely(nahum)\nforall x (Finite(x) -> Clouded(x))\nAnabolic(zorine) -> Autoerotic(zorine)\nforall x (Princely(x) and Finite(x) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Princely(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) and Princely(x) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Limbic(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) and Clouded(x) -> Cervine(x))\nforall x (Cervine(x) and Anabolic(x) -> Princely(x))\n\nnot Cervine(zorine)\n\ntherefore Cervine(zorine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Genia is moderato. Leonora is unfinished. Janaye is uncousinly. Round things are unfinished. If Genia is vatical then Genia is sequent. If something is uncousinly and populated then it is unfinished. If something is uncousinly then it is sequent. Blue, uncousinly things are ridged. If something is ridged then it is vatical. Blue, unfinished things are moderato. All moderato, vatical things are uncousinly. Janaye is sequent.", "logic": "\nModerato(genia)\nUnfinished(leonora)\nUncousinly(janaye)\nforall x (Populated(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nVatical(genia) -> Sequent(genia)\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) and Populated(x) -> Unfinished(x))\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Sequent(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Uncousinly(x) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Ridged(x) -> Vatical(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Unfinished(x) -> Moderato(x))\nforall x (Moderato(x) and Vatical(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\n\nSequent(janaye)\n\nUncousinly(janaye) and forall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Sequent(x)) -> therefore Sequent(janaye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Cybill is deadened. Marit is crescendo. Sheba is unsworn. Round things are crescendo. If Cybill is lethal then Cybill is maddened. If something is unsworn and enlarged then it is crescendo. If something is unsworn then it is maddened. Blue, unsworn things are received. If something is received then it is lethal. Blue, crescendo things are deadened. All deadened, lethal things are unsworn. Sheba is not maddened.", "logic": "\nDeadened(cybill)\nCrescendo(marit)\nUnsworn(sheba)\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nLethal(cybill) -> Maddened(cybill)\nforall x (Unsworn(x) and Enlarged(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) -> Maddened(x))\nforall x (Maddened(x) and Unsworn(x) -> Received(x))\nforall x (Received(x) -> Lethal(x))\nforall x (Maddened(x) and Crescendo(x) -> Deadened(x))\nforall x (Deadened(x) and Lethal(x) -> Unsworn(x))\n\nnot Maddened(sheba)\n\nUnsworn(sheba) and forall x (Unsworn(x) -> Maddened(x)) -> therefore Maddened(sheba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Neall is hardcore. Waldo is anestric. Ginelle is unportable. Round things are anestric. If Neall is shameful then Neall is candid. If something is unportable and choleraic then it is anestric. If something is unportable then it is candid. Blue, unportable things are placatory. If something is placatory then it is shameful. Blue, anestric things are hardcore. All hardcore, shameful things are unportable. Ginelle is placatory.", "logic": "\nHardcore(neall)\nAnestric(waldo)\nUnportable(ginelle)\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Anestric(x))\nShameful(neall) -> Candid(neall)\nforall x (Unportable(x) and Choleraic(x) -> Anestric(x))\nforall x (Unportable(x) -> Candid(x))\nforall x (Candid(x) and Unportable(x) -> Placatory(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) -> Shameful(x))\nforall x (Candid(x) and Anestric(x) -> Hardcore(x))\nforall x (Hardcore(x) and Shameful(x) -> Unportable(x))\n\nPlacatory(ginelle)\n\nUnportable(ginelle) and forall x (Unportable(x) -> Candid(x)) -> therefore Candid(ginelle) Candid(ginelle) and Unportable(ginelle) and forall x (Candid(x) and Unportable(x) -> Placatory(x)) -> therefore Placatory(ginelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Norina is nonviscid. Chalmers is pliable. Quinlan is zygodactyl. Round things are pliable. If Norina is elflike then Norina is whiny. If something is zygodactyl and robustious then it is pliable. If something is zygodactyl then it is whiny. Blue, zygodactyl things are judgmental. If something is judgmental then it is elflike. Blue, pliable things are nonviscid. All nonviscid, elflike things are zygodactyl. Quinlan is not judgmental.", "logic": "\nNonviscid(norina)\nPliable(chalmers)\nZygodactyl(quinlan)\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> Pliable(x))\nElflike(norina) -> Whiny(norina)\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) and Robustious(x) -> Pliable(x))\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Whiny(x))\nforall x (Whiny(x) and Zygodactyl(x) -> Judgmental(x))\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Elflike(x))\nforall x (Whiny(x) and Pliable(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) and Elflike(x) -> Zygodactyl(x))\n\nnot Judgmental(quinlan)\n\nZygodactyl(quinlan) and forall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Whiny(x)) -> therefore Whiny(quinlan) Whiny(quinlan) and Zygodactyl(quinlan) and forall x (Whiny(x) and Zygodactyl(x) -> Judgmental(x)) -> therefore Judgmental(quinlan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Kalila is binominal. Carilyn is inhuman. Nona is myopic. Round things are inhuman. If Kalila is molar then Kalila is ransomed. If something is myopic and puzzling then it is inhuman. If something is myopic then it is ransomed. Blue, myopic things are arcane. If something is arcane then it is molar. Blue, inhuman things are binominal. All binominal, molar things are myopic. Nona is molar.", "logic": "\nBinominal(kalila)\nInhuman(carilyn)\nMyopic(nona)\nforall x (Puzzling(x) -> Inhuman(x))\nMolar(kalila) -> Ransomed(kalila)\nforall x (Myopic(x) and Puzzling(x) -> Inhuman(x))\nforall x (Myopic(x) -> Ransomed(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Myopic(x) -> Arcane(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) -> Molar(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Inhuman(x) -> Binominal(x))\nforall x (Binominal(x) and Molar(x) -> Myopic(x))\n\nMolar(nona)\n\nMyopic(nona) and forall x (Myopic(x) -> Ransomed(x)) -> therefore Ransomed(nona) Ransomed(nona) and Myopic(nona) and forall x (Ransomed(x) and Myopic(x) -> Arcane(x)) -> therefore Arcane(nona) Arcane(nona) and forall x (Arcane(x) -> Molar(x)) -> therefore Molar(nona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Grissel is skyward. Clio is exoergic. Jori is protestant. Round things are exoergic. If Grissel is unasked then Grissel is attached. If something is protestant and tracheal then it is exoergic. If something is protestant then it is attached. Blue, protestant things are small. If something is small then it is unasked. Blue, exoergic things are skyward. All skyward, unasked things are protestant. Jori is not unasked.", "logic": "\nSkyward(grissel)\nExoergic(clio)\nProtestant(jori)\nforall x (Tracheal(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nUnasked(grissel) -> Attached(grissel)\nforall x (Protestant(x) and Tracheal(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Protestant(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Protestant(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Small(x) -> Unasked(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Exoergic(x) -> Skyward(x))\nforall x (Skyward(x) and Unasked(x) -> Protestant(x))\n\nnot Unasked(jori)\n\nProtestant(jori) and forall x (Protestant(x) -> Attached(x)) -> therefore Attached(jori) Attached(jori) and Protestant(jori) and forall x (Attached(x) and Protestant(x) -> Small(x)) -> therefore Small(jori) Small(jori) and forall x (Small(x) -> Unasked(x)) -> therefore Unasked(jori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Austine is bootleg. Beret is illusional. Mallory is theatrical. Round things are illusional. If Austine is brambly then Austine is knackered. If something is theatrical and weaned then it is illusional. If something is theatrical then it is knackered. Blue, theatrical things are dirt. If something is dirt then it is brambly. Blue, illusional things are bootleg. All bootleg, brambly things are theatrical. Austine is not illusional.", "logic": "\nBootleg(austine)\nIllusional(beret)\nTheatrical(mallory)\nforall x (Weaned(x) -> Illusional(x))\nBrambly(austine) -> Knackered(austine)\nforall x (Theatrical(x) and Weaned(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) -> Knackered(x))\nforall x (Knackered(x) and Theatrical(x) -> Dirt(x))\nforall x (Dirt(x) -> Brambly(x))\nforall x (Knackered(x) and Illusional(x) -> Bootleg(x))\nforall x (Bootleg(x) and Brambly(x) -> Theatrical(x))\n\nnot Illusional(austine)\n\nforall x (Weaned(x) -> Illusional(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Fleur is mistreated. Myranda is difficult. Umberto is diametral. Round things are difficult. If Fleur is telescopic then Fleur is surmounted. If something is diametral and sigmoidal then it is difficult. If something is diametral then it is surmounted. Blue, diametral things are invitatory. If something is invitatory then it is telescopic. Blue, difficult things are mistreated. All mistreated, telescopic things are diametral. Fleur is diametral.", "logic": "\nMistreated(fleur)\nDifficult(myranda)\nDiametral(umberto)\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) -> Difficult(x))\nTelescopic(fleur) -> Surmounted(fleur)\nforall x (Diametral(x) and Sigmoidal(x) -> Difficult(x))\nforall x (Diametral(x) -> Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) and Diametral(x) -> Invitatory(x))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) and Difficult(x) -> Mistreated(x))\nforall x (Mistreated(x) and Telescopic(x) -> Diametral(x))\n\nDiametral(fleur)\n\nforall x (Mistreated(x) and Telescopic(x) -> Diametral(x)) <- forall x (Invitatory(x) -> Telescopic(x)) <- forall x (Surmounted(x) and Diametral(x) -> Invitatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Carroll is umteen. Phillip is tattling. Winslow is blunted. Round things are tattling. If Carroll is rusty then Carroll is unary. If something is blunted and geothermic then it is tattling. If something is blunted then it is unary. Blue, blunted things are barrelled. If something is barrelled then it is rusty. Blue, tattling things are umteen. All umteen, rusty things are blunted. Carroll is not rusty.", "logic": "\nUmteen(carroll)\nTattling(phillip)\nBlunted(winslow)\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Tattling(x))\nRusty(carroll) -> Unary(carroll)\nforall x (Blunted(x) and Geothermic(x) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Blunted(x) -> Unary(x))\nforall x (Unary(x) and Blunted(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nforall x (Barrelled(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Unary(x) and Tattling(x) -> Umteen(x))\nforall x (Umteen(x) and Rusty(x) -> Blunted(x))\n\nnot Rusty(carroll)\n\nforall x (Barrelled(x) -> Rusty(x)) <- forall x (Unary(x) and Blunted(x) -> Barrelled(x)) <- forall x (Umteen(x) and Rusty(x) -> Blunted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Winn is volumetric. Guy is underhand. Thea is limpid. Round things are underhand. If Winn is bifocal then Winn is oracular. If something is limpid and smothered then it is underhand. If something is limpid then it is oracular. Blue, limpid things are socialist. If something is socialist then it is bifocal. Blue, underhand things are volumetric. All volumetric, bifocal things are limpid. Guy is limpid.", "logic": "\nVolumetric(winn)\nUnderhand(guy)\nLimpid(thea)\nforall x (Smothered(x) -> Underhand(x))\nBifocal(winn) -> Oracular(winn)\nforall x (Limpid(x) and Smothered(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Limpid(x) -> Oracular(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) and Limpid(x) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> Bifocal(x))\nforall x (Oracular(x) and Underhand(x) -> Volumetric(x))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) and Bifocal(x) -> Limpid(x))\n\nLimpid(guy)\n\nforall x (Volumetric(x) and Bifocal(x) -> Limpid(x)) <- forall x (Oracular(x) and Underhand(x) -> Volumetric(x)) <- forall x (Limpid(x) -> Oracular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Rhea is identified. Sioux is bedewed. Neda is dappled. Round things are bedewed. If Rhea is unsalaried then Rhea is somber. If something is dappled and liquid then it is bedewed. If something is dappled then it is somber. Blue, dappled things are reechoing. If something is reechoing then it is unsalaried. Blue, bedewed things are identified. All identified, unsalaried things are dappled. Neda is not liquid.", "logic": "\nIdentified(rhea)\nBedewed(sioux)\nDappled(neda)\nforall x (Liquid(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nUnsalaried(rhea) -> Somber(rhea)\nforall x (Dappled(x) and Liquid(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nforall x (Dappled(x) -> Somber(x))\nforall x (Somber(x) and Dappled(x) -> Reechoing(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) -> Unsalaried(x))\nforall x (Somber(x) and Bedewed(x) -> Identified(x))\nforall x (Identified(x) and Unsalaried(x) -> Dappled(x))\n\nnot Liquid(neda)\n\nnot Liquid(neda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Englebart is farseeing. Filmore is volant. Norton is acentric. Round things are volant. If Englebart is boffo then Englebart is opaque. If something is acentric and inertial then it is volant. If something is acentric then it is opaque. Blue, acentric things are unworldly. If something is unworldly then it is boffo. Blue, volant things are farseeing. All farseeing, boffo things are acentric. Filmore is inertial.", "logic": "\nFarseeing(englebart)\nVolant(filmore)\nAcentric(norton)\nforall x (Inertial(x) -> Volant(x))\nBoffo(englebart) -> Opaque(englebart)\nforall x (Acentric(x) and Inertial(x) -> Volant(x))\nforall x (Acentric(x) -> Opaque(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) and Acentric(x) -> Unworldly(x))\nforall x (Unworldly(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) and Volant(x) -> Farseeing(x))\nforall x (Farseeing(x) and Boffo(x) -> Acentric(x))\n\nInertial(filmore)\n\nInertial(filmore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "The robinetta capacitate the roxie. The robinetta is maternal. The robinetta chivy the liz. The liz capacitate the robinetta. The liz is maternal. The liz coagulate the roxie. The liz coagulate the karry. The roxie capacitate the liz. The roxie is maternal. The karry capacitate the liz. The karry capacitate the roxie. The karry is divalent. If someone capacitate the liz then they are sauteed. If someone is maternal and they do not chase the karry then the karry does not see the robinetta. If someone is sauteed and they do not chase the karry then the karry capacitate the liz. If the robinetta chivy the roxie then the robinetta coagulate the karry. If someone chivy the roxie and they do not chase the roxie then they need the karry. If someone chivy the roxie and they chase the roxie then the roxie is divalent. If someone is sauteed then they need the roxie. If someone is sauteed and they do not need the roxie then they do not see the roxie. The liz is maternal.", "logic": "\nCapacitate(robinetta, roxie)\nMaternal(robinetta)\nChivy(robinetta, liz)\nCapacitate(liz, robinetta)\nMaternal(liz)\nCoagulate(liz, roxie)\nCoagulate(liz, karry)\nCapacitate(roxie, liz)\nMaternal(roxie)\nCapacitate(karry, liz)\nCapacitate(karry, roxie)\nDivalent(karry)\nforall x (Capacitate(x, liz) -> Sauteed(x))\nforall x (Maternal(x) and not Capacitate(x, karry) -> not Coagulate(karry, robinetta))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) and not Capacitate(x, karry) -> Capacitate(karry, liz))\nChivy(robinetta, roxie) -> Coagulate(robinetta, karry)\nforall x (Chivy(x, roxie) and not Capacitate(x, roxie) -> Chivy(x, karry))\nforall x (Chivy(x, roxie) and Capacitate(x, roxie) -> Divalent(roxie))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) -> Chivy(x, roxie))\nforall x (Sauteed(x) and not Chivy(x, roxie) -> not Coagulate(x, roxie))\n\nMaternal(liz)\n\ntherefore Maternal(liz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The adore dimension the daisey. The adore is christly. The adore supplant the ulrike. The ulrike dimension the adore. The ulrike is christly. The ulrike prickle the daisey. The ulrike prickle the cliff. The daisey dimension the ulrike. The daisey is christly. The cliff dimension the ulrike. The cliff dimension the daisey. The cliff is jointed. If someone dimension the ulrike then they are gaunt. If someone is christly and they do not chase the cliff then the cliff does not see the adore. If someone is gaunt and they do not chase the cliff then the cliff dimension the ulrike. If the adore supplant the daisey then the adore prickle the cliff. If someone supplant the daisey and they do not chase the daisey then they need the cliff. If someone supplant the daisey and they chase the daisey then the daisey is jointed. If someone is gaunt then they need the daisey. If someone is gaunt and they do not need the daisey then they do not see the daisey. The cliff does not chase the ulrike.", "logic": "\nDimension(adore, daisey)\nChristly(adore)\nSupplant(adore, ulrike)\nDimension(ulrike, adore)\nChristly(ulrike)\nPrickle(ulrike, daisey)\nPrickle(ulrike, cliff)\nDimension(daisey, ulrike)\nChristly(daisey)\nDimension(cliff, ulrike)\nDimension(cliff, daisey)\nJointed(cliff)\nforall x (Dimension(x, ulrike) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Christly(x) and not Dimension(x, cliff) -> not Prickle(cliff, adore))\nforall x (Gaunt(x) and not Dimension(x, cliff) -> Dimension(cliff, ulrike))\nSupplant(adore, daisey) -> Prickle(adore, cliff)\nforall x (Supplant(x, daisey) and not Dimension(x, daisey) -> Supplant(x, cliff))\nforall x (Supplant(x, daisey) and Dimension(x, daisey) -> Jointed(daisey))\nforall x (Gaunt(x) -> Supplant(x, daisey))\nforall x (Gaunt(x) and not Supplant(x, daisey) -> not Prickle(x, daisey))\n\nnot Dimension(cliff, ulrike)\n\ntherefore Dimension(cliff, ulrike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The harrietta border the gypsy. The harrietta is agonizing. The harrietta powerwash the michael. The michael border the harrietta. The michael is agonizing. The michael nominate the gypsy. The michael nominate the minna. The gypsy border the michael. The gypsy is agonizing. The minna border the michael. The minna border the gypsy. The minna is monoclonal. If someone border the michael then they are humid. If someone is agonizing and they do not chase the minna then the minna does not see the harrietta. If someone is humid and they do not chase the minna then the minna border the michael. If the harrietta powerwash the gypsy then the harrietta nominate the minna. If someone powerwash the gypsy and they do not chase the gypsy then they need the minna. If someone powerwash the gypsy and they chase the gypsy then the gypsy is monoclonal. If someone is humid then they need the gypsy. If someone is humid and they do not need the gypsy then they do not see the gypsy. The gypsy is humid.", "logic": "\nBorder(harrietta, gypsy)\nAgonizing(harrietta)\nPowerwash(harrietta, michael)\nBorder(michael, harrietta)\nAgonizing(michael)\nNominate(michael, gypsy)\nNominate(michael, minna)\nBorder(gypsy, michael)\nAgonizing(gypsy)\nBorder(minna, michael)\nBorder(minna, gypsy)\nMonoclonal(minna)\nforall x (Border(x, michael) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) and not Border(x, minna) -> not Nominate(minna, harrietta))\nforall x (Humid(x) and not Border(x, minna) -> Border(minna, michael))\nPowerwash(harrietta, gypsy) -> Nominate(harrietta, minna)\nforall x (Powerwash(x, gypsy) and not Border(x, gypsy) -> Powerwash(x, minna))\nforall x (Powerwash(x, gypsy) and Border(x, gypsy) -> Monoclonal(gypsy))\nforall x (Humid(x) -> Powerwash(x, gypsy))\nforall x (Humid(x) and not Powerwash(x, gypsy) -> not Nominate(x, gypsy))\n\nHumid(gypsy)\n\nBorder(gypsy, michael) and forall x (Border(x, michael) -> Humid(x)) -> therefore Humid(gypsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The anabelle film the doti. The anabelle is objective. The anabelle unhorse the starlin. The starlin film the anabelle. The starlin is objective. The starlin adore the doti. The starlin adore the jerri. The doti film the starlin. The doti is objective. The jerri film the starlin. The jerri film the doti. The jerri is nethermost. If someone film the starlin then they are stable. If someone is objective and they do not chase the jerri then the jerri does not see the anabelle. If someone is stable and they do not chase the jerri then the jerri film the starlin. If the anabelle unhorse the doti then the anabelle adore the jerri. If someone unhorse the doti and they do not chase the doti then they need the jerri. If someone unhorse the doti and they chase the doti then the doti is nethermost. If someone is stable then they need the doti. If someone is stable and they do not need the doti then they do not see the doti. The doti is not stable.", "logic": "\nFilm(anabelle, doti)\nObjective(anabelle)\nUnhorse(anabelle, starlin)\nFilm(starlin, anabelle)\nObjective(starlin)\nAdore(starlin, doti)\nAdore(starlin, jerri)\nFilm(doti, starlin)\nObjective(doti)\nFilm(jerri, starlin)\nFilm(jerri, doti)\nNethermost(jerri)\nforall x (Film(x, starlin) -> Stable(x))\nforall x (Objective(x) and not Film(x, jerri) -> not Adore(jerri, anabelle))\nforall x (Stable(x) and not Film(x, jerri) -> Film(jerri, starlin))\nUnhorse(anabelle, doti) -> Adore(anabelle, jerri)\nforall x (Unhorse(x, doti) and not Film(x, doti) -> Unhorse(x, jerri))\nforall x (Unhorse(x, doti) and Film(x, doti) -> Nethermost(doti))\nforall x (Stable(x) -> Unhorse(x, doti))\nforall x (Stable(x) and not Unhorse(x, doti) -> not Adore(x, doti))\n\nnot Stable(doti)\n\nFilm(doti, starlin) and forall x (Film(x, starlin) -> Stable(x)) -> therefore Stable(doti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The kaspar arborise the alvina. The kaspar is pictured. The kaspar replace the sylvan. The sylvan arborise the kaspar. The sylvan is pictured. The sylvan still the alvina. The sylvan still the simonne. The alvina arborise the sylvan. The alvina is pictured. The simonne arborise the sylvan. The simonne arborise the alvina. The simonne is baculiform. If someone arborise the sylvan then they are punctual. If someone is pictured and they do not chase the simonne then the simonne does not see the kaspar. If someone is punctual and they do not chase the simonne then the simonne arborise the sylvan. If the kaspar replace the alvina then the kaspar still the simonne. If someone replace the alvina and they do not chase the alvina then they need the simonne. If someone replace the alvina and they chase the alvina then the alvina is baculiform. If someone is punctual then they need the alvina. If someone is punctual and they do not need the alvina then they do not see the alvina. The alvina replace the alvina.", "logic": "\nArborise(kaspar, alvina)\nPictured(kaspar)\nReplace(kaspar, sylvan)\nArborise(sylvan, kaspar)\nPictured(sylvan)\nStill(sylvan, alvina)\nStill(sylvan, simonne)\nArborise(alvina, sylvan)\nPictured(alvina)\nArborise(simonne, sylvan)\nArborise(simonne, alvina)\nBaculiform(simonne)\nforall x (Arborise(x, sylvan) -> Punctual(x))\nforall x (Pictured(x) and not Arborise(x, simonne) -> not Still(simonne, kaspar))\nforall x (Punctual(x) and not Arborise(x, simonne) -> Arborise(simonne, sylvan))\nReplace(kaspar, alvina) -> Still(kaspar, simonne)\nforall x (Replace(x, alvina) and not Arborise(x, alvina) -> Replace(x, simonne))\nforall x (Replace(x, alvina) and Arborise(x, alvina) -> Baculiform(alvina))\nforall x (Punctual(x) -> Replace(x, alvina))\nforall x (Punctual(x) and not Replace(x, alvina) -> not Still(x, alvina))\n\nReplace(alvina, alvina)\n\nArborise(alvina, sylvan) and forall x (Arborise(x, sylvan) -> Punctual(x)) -> therefore Punctual(alvina) Punctual(alvina) and forall x (Punctual(x) -> Replace(x, alvina)) -> therefore Replace(alvina, alvina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The evette volunteer the raimund. The evette is trihydroxy. The evette belong the dede. The dede volunteer the evette. The dede is trihydroxy. The dede program the raimund. The dede program the rollin. The raimund volunteer the dede. The raimund is trihydroxy. The rollin volunteer the dede. The rollin volunteer the raimund. The rollin is anaclitic. If someone volunteer the dede then they are spavined. If someone is trihydroxy and they do not chase the rollin then the rollin does not see the evette. If someone is spavined and they do not chase the rollin then the rollin volunteer the dede. If the evette belong the raimund then the evette program the rollin. If someone belong the raimund and they do not chase the raimund then they need the rollin. If someone belong the raimund and they chase the raimund then the raimund is anaclitic. If someone is spavined then they need the raimund. If someone is spavined and they do not need the raimund then they do not see the raimund. The rollin does not need the raimund.", "logic": "\nVolunteer(evette, raimund)\nTrihydroxy(evette)\nBelong(evette, dede)\nVolunteer(dede, evette)\nTrihydroxy(dede)\nProgram(dede, raimund)\nProgram(dede, rollin)\nVolunteer(raimund, dede)\nTrihydroxy(raimund)\nVolunteer(rollin, dede)\nVolunteer(rollin, raimund)\nAnaclitic(rollin)\nforall x (Volunteer(x, dede) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Trihydroxy(x) and not Volunteer(x, rollin) -> not Program(rollin, evette))\nforall x (Spavined(x) and not Volunteer(x, rollin) -> Volunteer(rollin, dede))\nBelong(evette, raimund) -> Program(evette, rollin)\nforall x (Belong(x, raimund) and not Volunteer(x, raimund) -> Belong(x, rollin))\nforall x (Belong(x, raimund) and Volunteer(x, raimund) -> Anaclitic(raimund))\nforall x (Spavined(x) -> Belong(x, raimund))\nforall x (Spavined(x) and not Belong(x, raimund) -> not Program(x, raimund))\n\nnot Belong(rollin, raimund)\n\nVolunteer(rollin, dede) and forall x (Volunteer(x, dede) -> Spavined(x)) -> therefore Spavined(rollin) Spavined(rollin) and forall x (Spavined(x) -> Belong(x, raimund)) -> therefore Belong(rollin, raimund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The rikki bedeck the griswold. The rikki is pyrectic. The rikki rumba the danella. The danella bedeck the rikki. The danella is pyrectic. The danella wreathe the griswold. The danella wreathe the merl. The griswold bedeck the danella. The griswold is pyrectic. The merl bedeck the danella. The merl bedeck the griswold. The merl is fossilised. If someone bedeck the danella then they are reverting. If someone is pyrectic and they do not chase the merl then the merl does not see the rikki. If someone is reverting and they do not chase the merl then the merl bedeck the danella. If the rikki rumba the griswold then the rikki wreathe the merl. If someone rumba the griswold and they do not chase the griswold then they need the merl. If someone rumba the griswold and they chase the griswold then the griswold is fossilised. If someone is reverting then they need the griswold. If someone is reverting and they do not need the griswold then they do not see the griswold. The griswold is fossilised.", "logic": "\nBedeck(rikki, griswold)\nPyrectic(rikki)\nRumba(rikki, danella)\nBedeck(danella, rikki)\nPyrectic(danella)\nWreathe(danella, griswold)\nWreathe(danella, merl)\nBedeck(griswold, danella)\nPyrectic(griswold)\nBedeck(merl, danella)\nBedeck(merl, griswold)\nFossilised(merl)\nforall x (Bedeck(x, danella) -> Reverting(x))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) and not Bedeck(x, merl) -> not Wreathe(merl, rikki))\nforall x (Reverting(x) and not Bedeck(x, merl) -> Bedeck(merl, danella))\nRumba(rikki, griswold) -> Wreathe(rikki, merl)\nforall x (Rumba(x, griswold) and not Bedeck(x, griswold) -> Rumba(x, merl))\nforall x (Rumba(x, griswold) and Bedeck(x, griswold) -> Fossilised(griswold))\nforall x (Reverting(x) -> Rumba(x, griswold))\nforall x (Reverting(x) and not Rumba(x, griswold) -> not Wreathe(x, griswold))\n\nFossilised(griswold)\n\nBedeck(merl, danella) and forall x (Bedeck(x, danella) -> Reverting(x)) -> therefore Reverting(merl) Reverting(merl) and forall x (Reverting(x) -> Rumba(x, griswold)) -> therefore Rumba(merl, griswold) Rumba(merl, griswold) and Bedeck(merl, griswold) and forall x (Rumba(x, griswold) and Bedeck(x, griswold) -> Fossilised(griswold)) -> therefore Fossilised(griswold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The lindsy hinge the durand. The lindsy is fencelike. The lindsy bestow the nero. The nero hinge the lindsy. The nero is fencelike. The nero charleston the durand. The nero charleston the mandi. The durand hinge the nero. The durand is fencelike. The mandi hinge the nero. The mandi hinge the durand. The mandi is goosy. If someone hinge the nero then they are ignitible. If someone is fencelike and they do not chase the mandi then the mandi does not see the lindsy. If someone is ignitible and they do not chase the mandi then the mandi hinge the nero. If the lindsy bestow the durand then the lindsy charleston the mandi. If someone bestow the durand and they do not chase the durand then they need the mandi. If someone bestow the durand and they chase the durand then the durand is goosy. If someone is ignitible then they need the durand. If someone is ignitible and they do not need the durand then they do not see the durand. The durand is not goosy.", "logic": "\nHinge(lindsy, durand)\nFencelike(lindsy)\nBestow(lindsy, nero)\nHinge(nero, lindsy)\nFencelike(nero)\nCharleston(nero, durand)\nCharleston(nero, mandi)\nHinge(durand, nero)\nFencelike(durand)\nHinge(mandi, nero)\nHinge(mandi, durand)\nGoosy(mandi)\nforall x (Hinge(x, nero) -> Ignitible(x))\nforall x (Fencelike(x) and not Hinge(x, mandi) -> not Charleston(mandi, lindsy))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and not Hinge(x, mandi) -> Hinge(mandi, nero))\nBestow(lindsy, durand) -> Charleston(lindsy, mandi)\nforall x (Bestow(x, durand) and not Hinge(x, durand) -> Bestow(x, mandi))\nforall x (Bestow(x, durand) and Hinge(x, durand) -> Goosy(durand))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) -> Bestow(x, durand))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and not Bestow(x, durand) -> not Charleston(x, durand))\n\nnot Goosy(durand)\n\nHinge(mandi, nero) and forall x (Hinge(x, nero) -> Ignitible(x)) -> therefore Ignitible(mandi) Ignitible(mandi) and forall x (Ignitible(x) -> Bestow(x, durand)) -> therefore Bestow(mandi, durand) Bestow(mandi, durand) and Hinge(mandi, durand) and forall x (Bestow(x, durand) and Hinge(x, durand) -> Goosy(durand)) -> therefore Goosy(durand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The kailey sublease the erek. The kailey is adsorptive. The kailey fare the milly. The milly sublease the kailey. The milly is adsorptive. The milly bullyrag the erek. The milly bullyrag the olly. The erek sublease the milly. The erek is adsorptive. The olly sublease the milly. The olly sublease the erek. The olly is trillion. If someone sublease the milly then they are calcitic. If someone is adsorptive and they do not chase the olly then the olly does not see the kailey. If someone is calcitic and they do not chase the olly then the olly sublease the milly. If the kailey fare the erek then the kailey bullyrag the olly. If someone fare the erek and they do not chase the erek then they need the olly. If someone fare the erek and they chase the erek then the erek is trillion. If someone is calcitic then they need the erek. If someone is calcitic and they do not need the erek then they do not see the erek. The olly does not need the olly.", "logic": "\nSublease(kailey, erek)\nAdsorptive(kailey)\nFare(kailey, milly)\nSublease(milly, kailey)\nAdsorptive(milly)\nBullyrag(milly, erek)\nBullyrag(milly, olly)\nSublease(erek, milly)\nAdsorptive(erek)\nSublease(olly, milly)\nSublease(olly, erek)\nTrillion(olly)\nforall x (Sublease(x, milly) -> Calcitic(x))\nforall x (Adsorptive(x) and not Sublease(x, olly) -> not Bullyrag(olly, kailey))\nforall x (Calcitic(x) and not Sublease(x, olly) -> Sublease(olly, milly))\nFare(kailey, erek) -> Bullyrag(kailey, olly)\nforall x (Fare(x, erek) and not Sublease(x, erek) -> Fare(x, olly))\nforall x (Fare(x, erek) and Sublease(x, erek) -> Trillion(erek))\nforall x (Calcitic(x) -> Fare(x, erek))\nforall x (Calcitic(x) and not Fare(x, erek) -> not Bullyrag(x, erek))\n\nnot Fare(olly, olly)\n\nforall x (Fare(x, erek) and not Sublease(x, erek) -> Fare(x, olly)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The marietta defeminise the shellie. The marietta is adust. The marietta retool the sylvia. The sylvia defeminise the marietta. The sylvia is adust. The sylvia stink the shellie. The sylvia stink the natale. The shellie defeminise the sylvia. The shellie is adust. The natale defeminise the sylvia. The natale defeminise the shellie. The natale is validated. If someone defeminise the sylvia then they are unkempt. If someone is adust and they do not chase the natale then the natale does not see the marietta. If someone is unkempt and they do not chase the natale then the natale defeminise the sylvia. If the marietta retool the shellie then the marietta stink the natale. If someone retool the shellie and they do not chase the shellie then they need the natale. If someone retool the shellie and they chase the shellie then the shellie is validated. If someone is unkempt then they need the shellie. If someone is unkempt and they do not need the shellie then they do not see the shellie. The sylvia retool the shellie.", "logic": "\nDefeminise(marietta, shellie)\nAdust(marietta)\nRetool(marietta, sylvia)\nDefeminise(sylvia, marietta)\nAdust(sylvia)\nStink(sylvia, shellie)\nStink(sylvia, natale)\nDefeminise(shellie, sylvia)\nAdust(shellie)\nDefeminise(natale, sylvia)\nDefeminise(natale, shellie)\nValidated(natale)\nforall x (Defeminise(x, sylvia) -> Unkempt(x))\nforall x (Adust(x) and not Defeminise(x, natale) -> not Stink(natale, marietta))\nforall x (Unkempt(x) and not Defeminise(x, natale) -> Defeminise(natale, sylvia))\nRetool(marietta, shellie) -> Stink(marietta, natale)\nforall x (Retool(x, shellie) and not Defeminise(x, shellie) -> Retool(x, natale))\nforall x (Retool(x, shellie) and Defeminise(x, shellie) -> Validated(shellie))\nforall x (Unkempt(x) -> Retool(x, shellie))\nforall x (Unkempt(x) and not Retool(x, shellie) -> not Stink(x, shellie))\n\nRetool(sylvia, shellie)\n\nforall x (Unkempt(x) -> Retool(x, shellie)) <- forall x (Defeminise(x, sylvia) -> Unkempt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The roana breach the orbadiah. The roana is changeful. The roana allege the ethelin. The ethelin breach the roana. The ethelin is changeful. The ethelin poultice the orbadiah. The ethelin poultice the emera. The orbadiah breach the ethelin. The orbadiah is changeful. The emera breach the ethelin. The emera breach the orbadiah. The emera is unitary. If someone breach the ethelin then they are recessive. If someone is changeful and they do not chase the emera then the emera does not see the roana. If someone is recessive and they do not chase the emera then the emera breach the ethelin. If the roana allege the orbadiah then the roana poultice the emera. If someone allege the orbadiah and they do not chase the orbadiah then they need the emera. If someone allege the orbadiah and they chase the orbadiah then the orbadiah is unitary. If someone is recessive then they need the orbadiah. If someone is recessive and they do not need the orbadiah then they do not see the orbadiah. The roana is not recessive.", "logic": "\nBreach(roana, orbadiah)\nChangeful(roana)\nAllege(roana, ethelin)\nBreach(ethelin, roana)\nChangeful(ethelin)\nPoultice(ethelin, orbadiah)\nPoultice(ethelin, emera)\nBreach(orbadiah, ethelin)\nChangeful(orbadiah)\nBreach(emera, ethelin)\nBreach(emera, orbadiah)\nUnitary(emera)\nforall x (Breach(x, ethelin) -> Recessive(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) and not Breach(x, emera) -> not Poultice(emera, roana))\nforall x (Recessive(x) and not Breach(x, emera) -> Breach(emera, ethelin))\nAllege(roana, orbadiah) -> Poultice(roana, emera)\nforall x (Allege(x, orbadiah) and not Breach(x, orbadiah) -> Allege(x, emera))\nforall x (Allege(x, orbadiah) and Breach(x, orbadiah) -> Unitary(orbadiah))\nforall x (Recessive(x) -> Allege(x, orbadiah))\nforall x (Recessive(x) and not Allege(x, orbadiah) -> not Poultice(x, orbadiah))\n\nnot Recessive(roana)\n\nforall x (Breach(x, ethelin) -> Recessive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The karalynn twiddle the nixie. The karalynn is polyvalent. The karalynn caponize the reza. The reza twiddle the karalynn. The reza is polyvalent. The reza taste the nixie. The reza taste the rebeka. The nixie twiddle the reza. The nixie is polyvalent. The rebeka twiddle the reza. The rebeka twiddle the nixie. The rebeka is thick. If someone twiddle the reza then they are hipless. If someone is polyvalent and they do not chase the rebeka then the rebeka does not see the karalynn. If someone is hipless and they do not chase the rebeka then the rebeka twiddle the reza. If the karalynn caponize the nixie then the karalynn taste the rebeka. If someone caponize the nixie and they do not chase the nixie then they need the rebeka. If someone caponize the nixie and they chase the nixie then the nixie is thick. If someone is hipless then they need the nixie. If someone is hipless and they do not need the nixie then they do not see the nixie. The nixie caponize the rebeka.", "logic": "\nTwiddle(karalynn, nixie)\nPolyvalent(karalynn)\nCaponize(karalynn, reza)\nTwiddle(reza, karalynn)\nPolyvalent(reza)\nTaste(reza, nixie)\nTaste(reza, rebeka)\nTwiddle(nixie, reza)\nPolyvalent(nixie)\nTwiddle(rebeka, reza)\nTwiddle(rebeka, nixie)\nThick(rebeka)\nforall x (Twiddle(x, reza) -> Hipless(x))\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) and not Twiddle(x, rebeka) -> not Taste(rebeka, karalynn))\nforall x (Hipless(x) and not Twiddle(x, rebeka) -> Twiddle(rebeka, reza))\nCaponize(karalynn, nixie) -> Taste(karalynn, rebeka)\nforall x (Caponize(x, nixie) and not Twiddle(x, nixie) -> Caponize(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Caponize(x, nixie) and Twiddle(x, nixie) -> Thick(nixie))\nforall x (Hipless(x) -> Caponize(x, nixie))\nforall x (Hipless(x) and not Caponize(x, nixie) -> not Taste(x, nixie))\n\nCaponize(nixie, rebeka)\n\nforall x (Caponize(x, nixie) and not Twiddle(x, nixie) -> Caponize(x, rebeka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The anthia point the wendy. The anthia is profligate. The anthia decree the nealy. The nealy point the anthia. The nealy is profligate. The nealy reimburse the wendy. The nealy reimburse the mirabel. The wendy point the nealy. The wendy is profligate. The mirabel point the nealy. The mirabel point the wendy. The mirabel is acetylenic. If someone point the nealy then they are blanched. If someone is profligate and they do not chase the mirabel then the mirabel does not see the anthia. If someone is blanched and they do not chase the mirabel then the mirabel point the nealy. If the anthia decree the wendy then the anthia reimburse the mirabel. If someone decree the wendy and they do not chase the wendy then they need the mirabel. If someone decree the wendy and they chase the wendy then the wendy is acetylenic. If someone is blanched then they need the wendy. If someone is blanched and they do not need the wendy then they do not see the wendy. The nealy does not need the nealy.", "logic": "\nPoint(anthia, wendy)\nProfligate(anthia)\nDecree(anthia, nealy)\nPoint(nealy, anthia)\nProfligate(nealy)\nReimburse(nealy, wendy)\nReimburse(nealy, mirabel)\nPoint(wendy, nealy)\nProfligate(wendy)\nPoint(mirabel, nealy)\nPoint(mirabel, wendy)\nAcetylenic(mirabel)\nforall x (Point(x, nealy) -> Blanched(x))\nforall x (Profligate(x) and not Point(x, mirabel) -> not Reimburse(mirabel, anthia))\nforall x (Blanched(x) and not Point(x, mirabel) -> Point(mirabel, nealy))\nDecree(anthia, wendy) -> Reimburse(anthia, mirabel)\nforall x (Decree(x, wendy) and not Point(x, wendy) -> Decree(x, mirabel))\nforall x (Decree(x, wendy) and Point(x, wendy) -> Acetylenic(wendy))\nforall x (Blanched(x) -> Decree(x, wendy))\nforall x (Blanched(x) and not Decree(x, wendy) -> not Reimburse(x, wendy))\n\nnot Decree(nealy, nealy)\n\nnot Decree(nealy, nealy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The peggy pause the lavena. The peggy is strong. The peggy retrieve the conan. The conan pause the peggy. The conan is strong. The conan lament the lavena. The conan lament the dee. The lavena pause the conan. The lavena is strong. The dee pause the conan. The dee pause the lavena. The dee is flip. If someone pause the conan then they are wormlike. If someone is strong and they do not chase the dee then the dee does not see the peggy. If someone is wormlike and they do not chase the dee then the dee pause the conan. If the peggy retrieve the lavena then the peggy lament the dee. If someone retrieve the lavena and they do not chase the lavena then they need the dee. If someone retrieve the lavena and they chase the lavena then the lavena is flip. If someone is wormlike then they need the lavena. If someone is wormlike and they do not need the lavena then they do not see the lavena. The dee pause the peggy.", "logic": "\nPause(peggy, lavena)\nStrong(peggy)\nRetrieve(peggy, conan)\nPause(conan, peggy)\nStrong(conan)\nLament(conan, lavena)\nLament(conan, dee)\nPause(lavena, conan)\nStrong(lavena)\nPause(dee, conan)\nPause(dee, lavena)\nFlip(dee)\nforall x (Pause(x, conan) -> Wormlike(x))\nforall x (Strong(x) and not Pause(x, dee) -> not Lament(dee, peggy))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) and not Pause(x, dee) -> Pause(dee, conan))\nRetrieve(peggy, lavena) -> Lament(peggy, dee)\nforall x (Retrieve(x, lavena) and not Pause(x, lavena) -> Retrieve(x, dee))\nforall x (Retrieve(x, lavena) and Pause(x, lavena) -> Flip(lavena))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Retrieve(x, lavena))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) and not Retrieve(x, lavena) -> not Lament(x, lavena))\n\nPause(dee, peggy)\n\nPause(dee, peggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The emil dine the obie. The emil is eellike. The emil detox the padraig. The padraig dine the emil. The padraig is eellike. The padraig instill the obie. The padraig instill the cindie. The obie dine the padraig. The obie is eellike. The cindie dine the padraig. The cindie dine the obie. The cindie is denuded. If someone dine the padraig then they are unswerving. If someone is eellike and they do not chase the cindie then the cindie does not see the emil. If someone is unswerving and they do not chase the cindie then the cindie dine the padraig. If the emil detox the obie then the emil instill the cindie. If someone detox the obie and they do not chase the obie then they need the cindie. If someone detox the obie and they chase the obie then the obie is denuded. If someone is unswerving then they need the obie. If someone is unswerving and they do not need the obie then they do not see the obie. The obie does not chase the cindie.", "logic": "\nDine(emil, obie)\nEellike(emil)\nDetox(emil, padraig)\nDine(padraig, emil)\nEellike(padraig)\nInstill(padraig, obie)\nInstill(padraig, cindie)\nDine(obie, padraig)\nEellike(obie)\nDine(cindie, padraig)\nDine(cindie, obie)\nDenuded(cindie)\nforall x (Dine(x, padraig) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Eellike(x) and not Dine(x, cindie) -> not Instill(cindie, emil))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) and not Dine(x, cindie) -> Dine(cindie, padraig))\nDetox(emil, obie) -> Instill(emil, cindie)\nforall x (Detox(x, obie) and not Dine(x, obie) -> Detox(x, cindie))\nforall x (Detox(x, obie) and Dine(x, obie) -> Denuded(obie))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) -> Detox(x, obie))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) and not Detox(x, obie) -> not Instill(x, obie))\n\nnot Dine(obie, cindie)\n\nnot Dine(obie, cindie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The torre bespatter the owen. The torre is salivary. The torre clerk the niels. The niels bespatter the torre. The niels is salivary. The niels deaminize the owen. The niels deaminize the gretna. The owen bespatter the niels. The owen is salivary. The gretna bespatter the niels. The gretna bespatter the owen. The gretna is vested. If someone bespatter the niels then they are hulky. If someone is salivary and they do not chase the gretna then the gretna does not see the torre. If someone is hulky and they do not chase the gretna then the gretna bespatter the niels. If the torre clerk the owen then the torre deaminize the gretna. If someone clerk the owen and they do not chase the owen then they need the gretna. If someone clerk the owen and they chase the owen then the owen is vested. If someone is hulky then they need the owen. If someone is hulky and they do not need the owen then they do not see the owen. The gretna clerk the niels.", "logic": "\nBespatter(torre, owen)\nSalivary(torre)\nClerk(torre, niels)\nBespatter(niels, torre)\nSalivary(niels)\nDeaminize(niels, owen)\nDeaminize(niels, gretna)\nBespatter(owen, niels)\nSalivary(owen)\nBespatter(gretna, niels)\nBespatter(gretna, owen)\nVested(gretna)\nforall x (Bespatter(x, niels) -> Hulky(x))\nforall x (Salivary(x) and not Bespatter(x, gretna) -> not Deaminize(gretna, torre))\nforall x (Hulky(x) and not Bespatter(x, gretna) -> Bespatter(gretna, niels))\nClerk(torre, owen) -> Deaminize(torre, gretna)\nforall x (Clerk(x, owen) and not Bespatter(x, owen) -> Clerk(x, gretna))\nforall x (Clerk(x, owen) and Bespatter(x, owen) -> Vested(owen))\nforall x (Hulky(x) -> Clerk(x, owen))\nforall x (Hulky(x) and not Clerk(x, owen) -> not Deaminize(x, owen))\n\nClerk(gretna, niels)\n\nClerk(gretna, niels) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1124"} {"premises": "The ilana is uncolumned. The korie trellis the iago. The korie is localized. The korie militate the ilana. The iago does not eat the ilana. The iago does not eat the antonia. The iago is aforesaid. The iago is not uncolumned. The iago seclude the ilana. The iago seclude the antonia. The iago militate the ilana. The antonia militate the ilana. If someone seclude the antonia and the antonia seclude the ilana then the ilana does not visit the iago. If someone trellis the iago and they are not uncolumned then they need the ilana. If the antonia trellis the ilana then the ilana is not unmoving. If someone is localized then they do not visit the antonia. If someone trellis the ilana then they are not localized. If someone is aforesaid and they visit the iago then the iago is demanding. If someone is unmoving then they need the iago. If someone seclude the iago and the iago does not eat the ilana then the ilana seclude the korie. The iago is aforesaid.", "logic": "\nUncolumned(ilana)\nTrellis(korie, iago)\nLocalized(korie)\nMilitate(korie, ilana)\nnot Trellis(iago, ilana)\nnot Trellis(iago, antonia)\nAforesaid(iago)\nnot Uncolumned(iago)\nSeclude(iago, ilana)\nSeclude(iago, antonia)\nMilitate(iago, ilana)\nMilitate(antonia, ilana)\nforall x (Seclude(x, antonia) and Seclude(antonia, ilana) -> not Militate(ilana, iago))\nforall x (Trellis(x, iago) and not Uncolumned(x) -> Seclude(x, ilana))\nTrellis(antonia, ilana) -> not Unmoving(ilana)\nforall x (Localized(x) -> not Militate(x, antonia))\nforall x (Trellis(x, ilana) -> not Localized(x))\nforall x (Aforesaid(x) and Militate(x, iago) -> Demanding(iago))\nforall x (Unmoving(x) -> Seclude(x, iago))\nforall x (Seclude(x, iago) and not Trellis(iago, ilana) -> Seclude(ilana, korie))\n\nAforesaid(iago)\n\ntherefore Aforesaid(iago)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2530"} {"premises": "The carrie is unangry. The romeo seem the mitchael. The romeo is desired. The romeo asphalt the carrie. The mitchael does not eat the carrie. The mitchael does not eat the alta. The mitchael is regulation. The mitchael is not unangry. The mitchael market the carrie. The mitchael market the alta. The mitchael asphalt the carrie. The alta asphalt the carrie. If someone market the alta and the alta market the carrie then the carrie does not visit the mitchael. If someone seem the mitchael and they are not unangry then they need the carrie. If the alta seem the carrie then the carrie is not euphonic. If someone is desired then they do not visit the alta. If someone seem the carrie then they are not desired. If someone is regulation and they visit the mitchael then the mitchael is biracial. If someone is euphonic then they need the mitchael. If someone market the mitchael and the mitchael does not eat the carrie then the carrie market the romeo. The mitchael seem the alta.", "logic": "\nUnangry(carrie)\nSeem(romeo, mitchael)\nDesired(romeo)\nAsphalt(romeo, carrie)\nnot Seem(mitchael, carrie)\nnot Seem(mitchael, alta)\nRegulation(mitchael)\nnot Unangry(mitchael)\nMarket(mitchael, carrie)\nMarket(mitchael, alta)\nAsphalt(mitchael, carrie)\nAsphalt(alta, carrie)\nforall x (Market(x, alta) and Market(alta, carrie) -> not Asphalt(carrie, mitchael))\nforall x (Seem(x, mitchael) and not Unangry(x) -> Market(x, carrie))\nSeem(alta, carrie) -> not Euphonic(carrie)\nforall x (Desired(x) -> not Asphalt(x, alta))\nforall x (Seem(x, carrie) -> not Desired(x))\nforall x (Regulation(x) and Asphalt(x, mitchael) -> Biracial(mitchael))\nforall x (Euphonic(x) -> Market(x, mitchael))\nforall x (Market(x, mitchael) and not Seem(mitchael, carrie) -> Market(carrie, romeo))\n\nSeem(mitchael, alta)\n\ntherefore not Seem(mitchael, alta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2530"} {"premises": "The agathe is cooked. The onida implicate the wilhelm. The onida is incendiary. The onida typeset the agathe. The wilhelm does not eat the agathe. The wilhelm does not eat the randy. The wilhelm is cognate. The wilhelm is not cooked. The wilhelm tenure the agathe. The wilhelm tenure the randy. The wilhelm typeset the agathe. The randy typeset the agathe. If someone tenure the randy and the randy tenure the agathe then the agathe does not visit the wilhelm. If someone implicate the wilhelm and they are not cooked then they need the agathe. If the randy implicate the agathe then the agathe is not ungreased. If someone is incendiary then they do not visit the randy. If someone implicate the agathe then they are not incendiary. If someone is cognate and they visit the wilhelm then the wilhelm is gibbous. If someone is ungreased then they need the wilhelm. If someone tenure the wilhelm and the wilhelm does not eat the agathe then the agathe tenure the onida. The onida does not need the agathe.", "logic": "\nCooked(agathe)\nImplicate(onida, wilhelm)\nIncendiary(onida)\nTypeset(onida, agathe)\nnot Implicate(wilhelm, agathe)\nnot Implicate(wilhelm, randy)\nCognate(wilhelm)\nnot Cooked(wilhelm)\nTenure(wilhelm, agathe)\nTenure(wilhelm, randy)\nTypeset(wilhelm, agathe)\nTypeset(randy, agathe)\nforall x (Tenure(x, randy) and Tenure(randy, agathe) -> not Typeset(agathe, wilhelm))\nforall x (Implicate(x, wilhelm) and not Cooked(x) -> Tenure(x, agathe))\nImplicate(randy, agathe) -> not Ungreased(agathe)\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> not Typeset(x, randy))\nforall x (Implicate(x, agathe) -> not Incendiary(x))\nforall x (Cognate(x) and Typeset(x, wilhelm) -> Gibbous(wilhelm))\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> Tenure(x, wilhelm))\nforall x (Tenure(x, wilhelm) and not Implicate(wilhelm, agathe) -> Tenure(agathe, onida))\n\nnot Tenure(onida, agathe)\n\nforall x (Implicate(x, wilhelm) and not Cooked(x) -> Tenure(x, agathe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2530"} {"premises": "The chloe is compulsive. The ellie clinch the halvard. The ellie is lxxv. The ellie facilitate the chloe. The halvard does not eat the chloe. The halvard does not eat the elnore. The halvard is ossified. The halvard is not compulsive. The halvard stickle the chloe. The halvard stickle the elnore. The halvard facilitate the chloe. The elnore facilitate the chloe. If someone stickle the elnore and the elnore stickle the chloe then the chloe does not visit the halvard. If someone clinch the halvard and they are not compulsive then they need the chloe. If the elnore clinch the chloe then the chloe is not cuboid. If someone is lxxv then they do not visit the elnore. If someone clinch the chloe then they are not lxxv. If someone is ossified and they visit the halvard then the halvard is yugoslav. If someone is cuboid then they need the halvard. If someone stickle the halvard and the halvard does not eat the chloe then the chloe stickle the ellie. The elnore facilitate the elnore.", "logic": "\nCompulsive(chloe)\nClinch(ellie, halvard)\nLxxv(ellie)\nFacilitate(ellie, chloe)\nnot Clinch(halvard, chloe)\nnot Clinch(halvard, elnore)\nOssified(halvard)\nnot Compulsive(halvard)\nStickle(halvard, chloe)\nStickle(halvard, elnore)\nFacilitate(halvard, chloe)\nFacilitate(elnore, chloe)\nforall x (Stickle(x, elnore) and Stickle(elnore, chloe) -> not Facilitate(chloe, halvard))\nforall x (Clinch(x, halvard) and not Compulsive(x) -> Stickle(x, chloe))\nClinch(elnore, chloe) -> not Cuboid(chloe)\nforall x (Lxxv(x) -> not Facilitate(x, elnore))\nforall x (Clinch(x, chloe) -> not Lxxv(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) and Facilitate(x, halvard) -> Yugoslav(halvard))\nforall x (Cuboid(x) -> Stickle(x, halvard))\nforall x (Stickle(x, halvard) and not Clinch(halvard, chloe) -> Stickle(chloe, ellie))\n\nFacilitate(elnore, elnore)\n\nFacilitate(elnore, elnore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2530"} {"premises": "Rem is thornless. Rem is eccentric. Tammara is unanalyzed. All eccentric things are elvish. If something is thornless and unanalyzed then it is assuring. All developed things are eccentric. If something is eccentric then it is assuring. Big things are thornless. All developed things are unanalyzed. If something is developed and assuring then it is believable. If something is assuring then it is developed. Rem is thornless.", "logic": "\nThornless(rem)\nEccentric(rem)\nUnanalyzed(tammara)\nforall x (Eccentric(x) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Thornless(x) and Unanalyzed(x) -> Assuring(x))\nforall x (Developed(x) -> Eccentric(x))\nforall x (Eccentric(x) -> Assuring(x))\nforall x (Assuring(x) -> Thornless(x))\nforall x (Developed(x) -> Unanalyzed(x))\nforall x (Developed(x) and Assuring(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Assuring(x) -> Developed(x))\n\nThornless(rem)\n\ntherefore Thornless(rem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Judd is nameless. Judd is undersized. Harlin is unspent. All undersized things are ravaged. If something is nameless and unspent then it is major. All voteless things are undersized. If something is undersized then it is major. Big things are nameless. All voteless things are unspent. If something is voteless and major then it is blasting. If something is major then it is voteless. Harlin is not unspent.", "logic": "\nNameless(judd)\nUndersized(judd)\nUnspent(harlin)\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Ravaged(x))\nforall x (Nameless(x) and Unspent(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Major(x) -> Nameless(x))\nforall x (Voteless(x) -> Unspent(x))\nforall x (Voteless(x) and Major(x) -> Blasting(x))\nforall x (Major(x) -> Voteless(x))\n\nnot Unspent(harlin)\n\ntherefore Unspent(harlin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Rhianna is gingerly. Rhianna is acarpelous. Leonid is unsought. All acarpelous things are gaunt. If something is gingerly and unsought then it is meager. All undivided things are acarpelous. If something is acarpelous then it is meager. Big things are gingerly. All undivided things are unsought. If something is undivided and meager then it is invisible. If something is meager then it is undivided. Rhianna is meager.", "logic": "\nGingerly(rhianna)\nAcarpelous(rhianna)\nUnsought(leonid)\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Gingerly(x) and Unsought(x) -> Meager(x))\nforall x (Undivided(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Meager(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nforall x (Undivided(x) -> Unsought(x))\nforall x (Undivided(x) and Meager(x) -> Invisible(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) -> Undivided(x))\n\nMeager(rhianna)\n\nAcarpelous(rhianna) and forall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Meager(x)) -> therefore Meager(rhianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Wilona is hortative. Wilona is corbelled. Atlante is shaded. All corbelled things are cuspate. If something is hortative and shaded then it is patrician. All sarcoid things are corbelled. If something is corbelled then it is patrician. Big things are hortative. All sarcoid things are shaded. If something is sarcoid and patrician then it is impressed. If something is patrician then it is sarcoid. Wilona is not patrician.", "logic": "\nHortative(wilona)\nCorbelled(wilona)\nShaded(atlante)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Hortative(x) and Shaded(x) -> Patrician(x))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Patrician(x))\nforall x (Patrician(x) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) -> Shaded(x))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) and Patrician(x) -> Impressed(x))\nforall x (Patrician(x) -> Sarcoid(x))\n\nnot Patrician(wilona)\n\nCorbelled(wilona) and forall x (Corbelled(x) -> Patrician(x)) -> therefore Patrician(wilona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Cob is deciding. Cob is slapstick. Marie is inbuilt. All slapstick things are stuffy. If something is deciding and inbuilt then it is removable. All gouty things are slapstick. If something is slapstick then it is removable. Big things are deciding. All gouty things are inbuilt. If something is gouty and removable then it is delightful. If something is removable then it is gouty. Cob is gouty.", "logic": "\nDeciding(cob)\nSlapstick(cob)\nInbuilt(marie)\nforall x (Slapstick(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Inbuilt(x) -> Removable(x))\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Slapstick(x))\nforall x (Slapstick(x) -> Removable(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Inbuilt(x))\nforall x (Gouty(x) and Removable(x) -> Delightful(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Gouty(x))\n\nGouty(cob)\n\nSlapstick(cob) and forall x (Slapstick(x) -> Removable(x)) -> therefore Removable(cob) Removable(cob) and forall x (Removable(x) -> Gouty(x)) -> therefore Gouty(cob)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Jeanine is sweeping. Jeanine is xliv. Hillary is baggy. All xliv things are upcountry. If something is sweeping and baggy then it is excretory. All unrelated things are xliv. If something is xliv then it is excretory. Big things are sweeping. All unrelated things are baggy. If something is unrelated and excretory then it is quaggy. If something is excretory then it is unrelated. Jeanine is not unrelated.", "logic": "\nSweeping(jeanine)\nXliv(jeanine)\nBaggy(hillary)\nforall x (Xliv(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Sweeping(x) and Baggy(x) -> Excretory(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) -> Xliv(x))\nforall x (Xliv(x) -> Excretory(x))\nforall x (Excretory(x) -> Sweeping(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) and Excretory(x) -> Quaggy(x))\nforall x (Excretory(x) -> Unrelated(x))\n\nnot Unrelated(jeanine)\n\nXliv(jeanine) and forall x (Xliv(x) -> Excretory(x)) -> therefore Excretory(jeanine) Excretory(jeanine) and forall x (Excretory(x) -> Unrelated(x)) -> therefore Unrelated(jeanine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Nessie is homesick. Nessie is tensional. Judy is cordate. All tensional things are tardy. If something is homesick and cordate then it is orthopedic. All cockamamy things are tensional. If something is tensional then it is orthopedic. Big things are homesick. All cockamamy things are cordate. If something is cockamamy and orthopedic then it is nightly. If something is orthopedic then it is cockamamy. Nessie is nightly.", "logic": "\nHomesick(nessie)\nTensional(nessie)\nCordate(judy)\nforall x (Tensional(x) -> Tardy(x))\nforall x (Homesick(x) and Cordate(x) -> Orthopedic(x))\nforall x (Cockamamy(x) -> Tensional(x))\nforall x (Tensional(x) -> Orthopedic(x))\nforall x (Orthopedic(x) -> Homesick(x))\nforall x (Cockamamy(x) -> Cordate(x))\nforall x (Cockamamy(x) and Orthopedic(x) -> Nightly(x))\nforall x (Orthopedic(x) -> Cockamamy(x))\n\nNightly(nessie)\n\nTensional(nessie) and forall x (Tensional(x) -> Orthopedic(x)) -> therefore Orthopedic(nessie) Orthopedic(nessie) and forall x (Orthopedic(x) -> Cockamamy(x)) -> therefore Cockamamy(nessie) Tensional(nessie) and forall x (Tensional(x) -> Orthopedic(x)) -> therefore Orthopedic(nessie) Cockamamy(nessie) and Orthopedic(nessie) and forall x (Cockamamy(x) and Orthopedic(x) -> Nightly(x)) -> therefore Nightly(nessie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Abe is ungrudging. Abe is nestorian. Rosmunda is trackable. All nestorian things are censored. If something is ungrudging and trackable then it is inscribed. All tibetan things are nestorian. If something is nestorian then it is inscribed. Big things are ungrudging. All tibetan things are trackable. If something is tibetan and inscribed then it is jesuitical. If something is inscribed then it is tibetan. Abe is not jesuitical.", "logic": "\nUngrudging(abe)\nNestorian(abe)\nTrackable(rosmunda)\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Censored(x))\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) and Trackable(x) -> Inscribed(x))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) -> Nestorian(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Inscribed(x))\nforall x (Inscribed(x) -> Ungrudging(x))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) -> Trackable(x))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) and Inscribed(x) -> Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Inscribed(x) -> Tibetan(x))\n\nnot Jesuitical(abe)\n\nNestorian(abe) and forall x (Nestorian(x) -> Inscribed(x)) -> therefore Inscribed(abe) Inscribed(abe) and forall x (Inscribed(x) -> Tibetan(x)) -> therefore Tibetan(abe) Nestorian(abe) and forall x (Nestorian(x) -> Inscribed(x)) -> therefore Inscribed(abe) Tibetan(abe) and Inscribed(abe) and forall x (Tibetan(x) and Inscribed(x) -> Jesuitical(x)) -> therefore Jesuitical(abe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Melanie is minimum. Melanie is toothy. Shena is pinioned. All toothy things are glittery. If something is minimum and pinioned then it is closed. All chapfallen things are toothy. If something is toothy then it is closed. Big things are minimum. All chapfallen things are pinioned. If something is chapfallen and closed then it is umbellate. If something is closed then it is chapfallen. Shena is not chapfallen.", "logic": "\nMinimum(melanie)\nToothy(melanie)\nPinioned(shena)\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Glittery(x))\nforall x (Minimum(x) and Pinioned(x) -> Closed(x))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) -> Toothy(x))\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Closed(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Minimum(x))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) -> Pinioned(x))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and Closed(x) -> Umbellate(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\n\nnot Chapfallen(shena)\n\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Chapfallen(x)) <- forall x (Minimum(x) and Pinioned(x) -> Closed(x)) <- forall x (Closed(x) -> Minimum(x)) <- forall x (Toothy(x) -> Closed(x)) <- forall x (Chapfallen(x) -> Toothy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Jaine is uncurbed. Jaine is confluent. Desiree is picayune. All confluent things are five. If something is uncurbed and picayune then it is boytrose. All westerly things are confluent. If something is confluent then it is boytrose. Big things are uncurbed. All westerly things are picayune. If something is westerly and boytrose then it is current. If something is boytrose then it is westerly. Desiree is current.", "logic": "\nUncurbed(jaine)\nConfluent(jaine)\nPicayune(desiree)\nforall x (Confluent(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) and Picayune(x) -> Boytrose(x))\nforall x (Westerly(x) -> Confluent(x))\nforall x (Confluent(x) -> Boytrose(x))\nforall x (Boytrose(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nforall x (Westerly(x) -> Picayune(x))\nforall x (Westerly(x) and Boytrose(x) -> Current(x))\nforall x (Boytrose(x) -> Westerly(x))\n\nCurrent(desiree)\n\nforall x (Westerly(x) and Boytrose(x) -> Current(x)) <- forall x (Boytrose(x) -> Westerly(x)) <- forall x (Uncurbed(x) and Picayune(x) -> Boytrose(x)) <- forall x (Boytrose(x) -> Uncurbed(x)) <- forall x (Confluent(x) -> Boytrose(x)) <- forall x (Westerly(x) -> Confluent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Herbert is katabolic. Herbert is dishonored. Obie is mulish. All dishonored things are nazi. If something is katabolic and mulish then it is siamese. All thwarted things are dishonored. If something is dishonored then it is siamese. Big things are katabolic. All thwarted things are mulish. If something is thwarted and siamese then it is lxxxvii. If something is siamese then it is thwarted. Obie is not siamese.", "logic": "\nKatabolic(herbert)\nDishonored(herbert)\nMulish(obie)\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Nazi(x))\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and Mulish(x) -> Siamese(x))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Siamese(x))\nforall x (Siamese(x) -> Katabolic(x))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) and Siamese(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Siamese(x) -> Thwarted(x))\n\nnot Siamese(obie)\n\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and Mulish(x) -> Siamese(x)) <- forall x (Siamese(x) -> Katabolic(x)) <- forall x (Dishonored(x) -> Siamese(x)) <- forall x (Thwarted(x) -> Dishonored(x)) <- forall x (Siamese(x) -> Thwarted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Nicolette is plotted. Nicolette is gradable. Dyana is dying. All gradable things are astatic. If something is plotted and dying then it is somalian. All sorry things are gradable. If something is gradable then it is somalian. Big things are plotted. All sorry things are dying. If something is sorry and somalian then it is detergent. If something is somalian then it is sorry. Dyana is astatic.", "logic": "\nPlotted(nicolette)\nGradable(nicolette)\nDying(dyana)\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Plotted(x) and Dying(x) -> Somalian(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) -> Gradable(x))\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Somalian(x))\nforall x (Somalian(x) -> Plotted(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) -> Dying(x))\nforall x (Sorry(x) and Somalian(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Somalian(x) -> Sorry(x))\n\nAstatic(dyana)\n\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Astatic(x)) <- forall x (Sorry(x) -> Gradable(x)) <- forall x (Somalian(x) -> Sorry(x)) <- forall x (Plotted(x) and Dying(x) -> Somalian(x)) <- forall x (Somalian(x) -> Plotted(x)) <- forall x (Gradable(x) -> Somalian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1139"} {"premises": "Rafael is chummy. Rafael is amethyst. Rafael is unexciting. Rafael is pursuing. Malcolm is alphameric. Malcolm is chummy. Malcolm is unexciting. Malcolm is britannic. Janith is chummy. Janith is unexciting. Janith is britannic. Meade is pursuing. If Rafael is pursuing then Rafael is amethyst. If something is unexciting and pursuing then it is amethyst. Rafael is pursuing.", "logic": "\nChummy(rafael)\nAmethyst(rafael)\nUnexciting(rafael)\nPursuing(rafael)\nAlphameric(malcolm)\nChummy(malcolm)\nUnexciting(malcolm)\nBritannic(malcolm)\nChummy(janith)\nUnexciting(janith)\nBritannic(janith)\nPursuing(meade)\nPursuing(rafael) -> Amethyst(rafael)\nforall x (Unexciting(x) and Pursuing(x) -> Amethyst(x))\n\nPursuing(rafael)\n\ntherefore Pursuing(rafael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6500"} {"premises": "Adrian is cervical. Adrian is paediatric. Adrian is meshuga. Adrian is mimetic. Elsy is hornlike. Elsy is cervical. Elsy is meshuga. Elsy is uttermost. Ardella is cervical. Ardella is meshuga. Ardella is uttermost. Neal is mimetic. If Adrian is mimetic then Adrian is paediatric. If something is meshuga and mimetic then it is paediatric. Ardella is not meshuga.", "logic": "\nCervical(adrian)\nPaediatric(adrian)\nMeshuga(adrian)\nMimetic(adrian)\nHornlike(elsy)\nCervical(elsy)\nMeshuga(elsy)\nUttermost(elsy)\nCervical(ardella)\nMeshuga(ardella)\nUttermost(ardella)\nMimetic(neal)\nMimetic(adrian) -> Paediatric(adrian)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) and Mimetic(x) -> Paediatric(x))\n\nnot Meshuga(ardella)\n\ntherefore Meshuga(ardella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6500"} {"premises": "Ninette is pyramidic. Ninette is satisfying. Ninette is offshore. Ninette is rheumatic. Veradis is bedfast. Veradis is pyramidic. Veradis is offshore. Veradis is syrupy. Elfie is pyramidic. Elfie is offshore. Elfie is syrupy. Zorah is rheumatic. If Ninette is rheumatic then Ninette is satisfying. If something is offshore and rheumatic then it is satisfying. Elfie is not satisfying.", "logic": "\nPyramidic(ninette)\nSatisfying(ninette)\nOffshore(ninette)\nRheumatic(ninette)\nBedfast(veradis)\nPyramidic(veradis)\nOffshore(veradis)\nSyrupy(veradis)\nPyramidic(elfie)\nOffshore(elfie)\nSyrupy(elfie)\nRheumatic(zorah)\nRheumatic(ninette) -> Satisfying(ninette)\nforall x (Offshore(x) and Rheumatic(x) -> Satisfying(x))\n\nnot Satisfying(elfie)\n\nforall x (Offshore(x) and Rheumatic(x) -> Satisfying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6500"} {"premises": "Gale is unclipped. Gale is astomatous. Gale is thenal. Gale is ablaze. Herve is confounded. Herve is unclipped. Herve is thenal. Herve is floury. Pearle is unclipped. Pearle is thenal. Pearle is floury. Gretna is ablaze. If Gale is ablaze then Gale is astomatous. If something is thenal and ablaze then it is astomatous. Herve is blue.", "logic": "\nUnclipped(gale)\nAstomatous(gale)\nThenal(gale)\nAblaze(gale)\nConfounded(herve)\nUnclipped(herve)\nThenal(herve)\nFloury(herve)\nUnclipped(pearle)\nThenal(pearle)\nFloury(pearle)\nAblaze(gretna)\nAblaze(gale) -> Astomatous(gale)\nforall x (Thenal(x) and Ablaze(x) -> Astomatous(x))\n\nBlue(herve)\n\nBlue(herve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6500"} {"premises": "Sasha is unsweet. Veriee is unfaceted. Cal is inverse. All coiling things are hemostatic. Young things are coiling. All hemostatic, coiling things are gleaming. If something is unfaceted and hemostatic then it is coiling. White, unsweet things are gleaming. If Cal is coiling and Cal is gleaming then Cal is evaluative. Veriee is unfaceted.", "logic": "\nUnsweet(sasha)\nUnfaceted(veriee)\nInverse(cal)\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Hemostatic(x))\nforall x (Unfaceted(x) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) and Coiling(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nforall x (Unfaceted(x) and Hemostatic(x) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Evaluative(x) and Unsweet(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nCoiling(cal) and Gleaming(cal) -> Evaluative(cal)\n\nUnfaceted(veriee)\n\ntherefore Unfaceted(veriee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Siouxie is archaean. Way is gullible. Nelson is adient. All fascinated things are sinning. Young things are fascinated. All sinning, fascinated things are woozy. If something is gullible and sinning then it is fascinated. White, archaean things are woozy. If Nelson is fascinated and Nelson is woozy then Nelson is sylphlike. Siouxie is not archaean.", "logic": "\nArchaean(siouxie)\nGullible(way)\nAdient(nelson)\nforall x (Fascinated(x) -> Sinning(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) -> Fascinated(x))\nforall x (Sinning(x) and Fascinated(x) -> Woozy(x))\nforall x (Gullible(x) and Sinning(x) -> Fascinated(x))\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) and Archaean(x) -> Woozy(x))\nFascinated(nelson) and Woozy(nelson) -> Sylphlike(nelson)\n\nnot Archaean(siouxie)\n\ntherefore Archaean(siouxie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Duane is alchemic. Karleen is tasseled. Auroora is indigenous. All endoscopic things are formative. Young things are endoscopic. All formative, endoscopic things are cherry. If something is tasseled and formative then it is endoscopic. White, alchemic things are cherry. If Auroora is endoscopic and Auroora is cherry then Auroora is substitute. Karleen is endoscopic.", "logic": "\nAlchemic(duane)\nTasseled(karleen)\nIndigenous(auroora)\nforall x (Endoscopic(x) -> Formative(x))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> Endoscopic(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) and Endoscopic(x) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Formative(x) -> Endoscopic(x))\nforall x (Substitute(x) and Alchemic(x) -> Cherry(x))\nEndoscopic(auroora) and Cherry(auroora) -> Substitute(auroora)\n\nEndoscopic(karleen)\n\nTasseled(karleen) and forall x (Tasseled(x) -> Endoscopic(x)) -> therefore Endoscopic(karleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Anthea is worshipful. Avis is auriculate. Slade is cephalopod. All soprano things are front. Young things are soprano. All front, soprano things are chimeral. If something is auriculate and front then it is soprano. White, worshipful things are chimeral. If Slade is soprano and Slade is chimeral then Slade is frozen. Avis is not soprano.", "logic": "\nWorshipful(anthea)\nAuriculate(avis)\nCephalopod(slade)\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> Front(x))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Soprano(x))\nforall x (Front(x) and Soprano(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) and Front(x) -> Soprano(x))\nforall x (Frozen(x) and Worshipful(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nSoprano(slade) and Chimeral(slade) -> Frozen(slade)\n\nnot Soprano(avis)\n\nAuriculate(avis) and forall x (Auriculate(x) -> Soprano(x)) -> therefore Soprano(avis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Kippie is historic. Denna is ensuing. Bernice is zoological. All narcotic things are flowering. Young things are narcotic. All flowering, narcotic things are unnameable. If something is ensuing and flowering then it is narcotic. White, historic things are unnameable. If Bernice is narcotic and Bernice is unnameable then Bernice is retractile. Denna is flowering.", "logic": "\nHistoric(kippie)\nEnsuing(denna)\nZoological(bernice)\nforall x (Narcotic(x) -> Flowering(x))\nforall x (Ensuing(x) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Flowering(x) and Narcotic(x) -> Unnameable(x))\nforall x (Ensuing(x) and Flowering(x) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Retractile(x) and Historic(x) -> Unnameable(x))\nNarcotic(bernice) and Unnameable(bernice) -> Retractile(bernice)\n\nFlowering(denna)\n\nEnsuing(denna) and forall x (Ensuing(x) -> Narcotic(x)) -> therefore Narcotic(denna) Narcotic(denna) and forall x (Narcotic(x) -> Flowering(x)) -> therefore Flowering(denna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Audy is acuate. Brandy is accidental. Olaf is side. All worth things are median. Young things are worth. All median, worth things are grisly. If something is accidental and median then it is worth. White, acuate things are grisly. If Olaf is worth and Olaf is grisly then Olaf is meddling. Brandy is not median.", "logic": "\nAcuate(audy)\nAccidental(brandy)\nSide(olaf)\nforall x (Worth(x) -> Median(x))\nforall x (Accidental(x) -> Worth(x))\nforall x (Median(x) and Worth(x) -> Grisly(x))\nforall x (Accidental(x) and Median(x) -> Worth(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and Acuate(x) -> Grisly(x))\nWorth(olaf) and Grisly(olaf) -> Meddling(olaf)\n\nnot Median(brandy)\n\nAccidental(brandy) and forall x (Accidental(x) -> Worth(x)) -> therefore Worth(brandy) Worth(brandy) and forall x (Worth(x) -> Median(x)) -> therefore Median(brandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Tabbie is sultry. Corabel is autoimmune. Samaria is limpid. All grammatic things are diaphyseal. Young things are grammatic. All diaphyseal, grammatic things are monolithic. If something is autoimmune and diaphyseal then it is grammatic. White, sultry things are monolithic. If Samaria is grammatic and Samaria is monolithic then Samaria is polyphonic. Corabel is monolithic.", "logic": "\nSultry(tabbie)\nAutoimmune(corabel)\nLimpid(samaria)\nforall x (Grammatic(x) -> Diaphyseal(x))\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Grammatic(x))\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) and Grammatic(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) and Diaphyseal(x) -> Grammatic(x))\nforall x (Polyphonic(x) and Sultry(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nGrammatic(samaria) and Monolithic(samaria) -> Polyphonic(samaria)\n\nMonolithic(corabel)\n\nAutoimmune(corabel) and forall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Grammatic(x)) -> therefore Grammatic(corabel) Grammatic(corabel) and forall x (Grammatic(x) -> Diaphyseal(x)) -> therefore Diaphyseal(corabel) Autoimmune(corabel) and forall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Grammatic(x)) -> therefore Grammatic(corabel) Diaphyseal(corabel) and Grammatic(corabel) and forall x (Diaphyseal(x) and Grammatic(x) -> Monolithic(x)) -> therefore Monolithic(corabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Grace is ahorseback. Lonni is afflicted. Jack is advertised. All eleventh things are rarified. Young things are eleventh. All rarified, eleventh things are precative. If something is afflicted and rarified then it is eleventh. White, ahorseback things are precative. If Jack is eleventh and Jack is precative then Jack is orchestral. Lonni is not precative.", "logic": "\nAhorseback(grace)\nAfflicted(lonni)\nAdvertised(jack)\nforall x (Eleventh(x) -> Rarified(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Eleventh(x))\nforall x (Rarified(x) and Eleventh(x) -> Precative(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and Rarified(x) -> Eleventh(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and Ahorseback(x) -> Precative(x))\nEleventh(jack) and Precative(jack) -> Orchestral(jack)\n\nnot Precative(lonni)\n\nAfflicted(lonni) and forall x (Afflicted(x) -> Eleventh(x)) -> therefore Eleventh(lonni) Eleventh(lonni) and forall x (Eleventh(x) -> Rarified(x)) -> therefore Rarified(lonni) Afflicted(lonni) and forall x (Afflicted(x) -> Eleventh(x)) -> therefore Eleventh(lonni) Rarified(lonni) and Eleventh(lonni) and forall x (Rarified(x) and Eleventh(x) -> Precative(x)) -> therefore Precative(lonni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Dimitrou is boyish. Amandi is taurine. Arlinda is coseismic. All bedfast things are unnerving. Young things are bedfast. All unnerving, bedfast things are undried. If something is taurine and unnerving then it is bedfast. White, boyish things are undried. If Arlinda is bedfast and Arlinda is undried then Arlinda is arenaceous. Arlinda is not undried.", "logic": "\nBoyish(dimitrou)\nTaurine(amandi)\nCoseismic(arlinda)\nforall x (Bedfast(x) -> Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Bedfast(x))\nforall x (Unnerving(x) and Bedfast(x) -> Undried(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Unnerving(x) -> Bedfast(x))\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) and Boyish(x) -> Undried(x))\nBedfast(arlinda) and Undried(arlinda) -> Arenaceous(arlinda)\n\nnot Undried(arlinda)\n\nforall x (Unnerving(x) and Bedfast(x) -> Undried(x)) <- forall x (Taurine(x) -> Bedfast(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Coletta is occlusive. Lorelle is placid. Ivor is umbellate. All shagged things are manual. Young things are shagged. All manual, shagged things are unsafe. If something is placid and manual then it is shagged. White, occlusive things are unsafe. If Ivor is shagged and Ivor is unsafe then Ivor is manned. Coletta is unsafe.", "logic": "\nOcclusive(coletta)\nPlacid(lorelle)\nUmbellate(ivor)\nforall x (Shagged(x) -> Manual(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) -> Shagged(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) and Shagged(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) and Manual(x) -> Shagged(x))\nforall x (Manned(x) and Occlusive(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nShagged(ivor) and Unsafe(ivor) -> Manned(ivor)\n\nUnsafe(coletta)\n\nforall x (Manual(x) and Shagged(x) -> Unsafe(x)) <- forall x (Placid(x) -> Shagged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Marcille is studded. Antin is latin. Jerzy is boffo. All casuistic things are croaky. Young things are casuistic. All croaky, casuistic things are dissoluble. If something is latin and croaky then it is casuistic. White, studded things are dissoluble. If Jerzy is casuistic and Jerzy is dissoluble then Jerzy is sprawly. Jerzy is not casuistic.", "logic": "\nStudded(marcille)\nLatin(antin)\nBoffo(jerzy)\nforall x (Casuistic(x) -> Croaky(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) -> Casuistic(x))\nforall x (Croaky(x) and Casuistic(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) and Croaky(x) -> Casuistic(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) and Studded(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nCasuistic(jerzy) and Dissoluble(jerzy) -> Sprawly(jerzy)\n\nnot Casuistic(jerzy)\n\nforall x (Latin(x) -> Casuistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Darcey is libyan. Justis is sometime. Rusty is commensal. All censurable things are velvety. Young things are censurable. All velvety, censurable things are forensic. If something is sometime and velvety then it is censurable. White, libyan things are forensic. If Rusty is censurable and Rusty is forensic then Rusty is carpal. Rusty is carpal.", "logic": "\nLibyan(darcey)\nSometime(justis)\nCommensal(rusty)\nforall x (Censurable(x) -> Velvety(x))\nforall x (Sometime(x) -> Censurable(x))\nforall x (Velvety(x) and Censurable(x) -> Forensic(x))\nforall x (Sometime(x) and Velvety(x) -> Censurable(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) and Libyan(x) -> Forensic(x))\nCensurable(rusty) and Forensic(rusty) -> Carpal(rusty)\n\nCarpal(rusty)\n\nCensurable(rusty) and Forensic(rusty) -> Carpal(rusty) <- forall x (Sometime(x) -> Censurable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Chantal is excretory. Tabb is alveolar. Melania is jagged. All pure things are abounding. Young things are pure. All abounding, pure things are ergonomic. If something is alveolar and abounding then it is pure. White, excretory things are ergonomic. If Melania is pure and Melania is ergonomic then Melania is homogenous. Melania is not excretory.", "logic": "\nExcretory(chantal)\nAlveolar(tabb)\nJagged(melania)\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Abounding(x))\nforall x (Alveolar(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Abounding(x) and Pure(x) -> Ergonomic(x))\nforall x (Alveolar(x) and Abounding(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Homogenous(x) and Excretory(x) -> Ergonomic(x))\nPure(melania) and Ergonomic(melania) -> Homogenous(melania)\n\nnot Excretory(melania)\n\nnot Excretory(melania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Mathias is raucous. Eugenie is motorized. Lambert is swampy. All cavitied things are dispirited. Young things are cavitied. All dispirited, cavitied things are stinking. If something is motorized and dispirited then it is cavitied. White, raucous things are stinking. If Lambert is cavitied and Lambert is stinking then Lambert is zaftig. Lambert is motorized.", "logic": "\nRaucous(mathias)\nMotorized(eugenie)\nSwampy(lambert)\nforall x (Cavitied(x) -> Dispirited(x))\nforall x (Motorized(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Dispirited(x) and Cavitied(x) -> Stinking(x))\nforall x (Motorized(x) and Dispirited(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) and Raucous(x) -> Stinking(x))\nCavitied(lambert) and Stinking(lambert) -> Zaftig(lambert)\n\nMotorized(lambert)\n\nMotorized(lambert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Alf is redeemed. Oona is upright. Avi is chimeric. All blighted things are sumerian. Young things are blighted. All sumerian, blighted things are moonlit. If something is upright and sumerian then it is blighted. White, redeemed things are moonlit. If Avi is blighted and Avi is moonlit then Avi is verbal. Alf is not upright.", "logic": "\nRedeemed(alf)\nUpright(oona)\nChimeric(avi)\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Sumerian(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) -> Blighted(x))\nforall x (Sumerian(x) and Blighted(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) and Sumerian(x) -> Blighted(x))\nforall x (Verbal(x) and Redeemed(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nBlighted(avi) and Moonlit(avi) -> Verbal(avi)\n\nnot Upright(alf)\n\nnot Upright(alf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "Nathaniel is paroicous. Urbano is laggard. Eli is prevailing. All chapped things are final. Young things are chapped. All final, chapped things are saxicolous. If something is laggard and final then it is chapped. White, paroicous things are saxicolous. If Eli is chapped and Eli is saxicolous then Eli is hammered. Nathaniel is hammered.", "logic": "\nParoicous(nathaniel)\nLaggard(urbano)\nPrevailing(eli)\nforall x (Chapped(x) -> Final(x))\nforall x (Laggard(x) -> Chapped(x))\nforall x (Final(x) and Chapped(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Laggard(x) and Final(x) -> Chapped(x))\nforall x (Hammered(x) and Paroicous(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nChapped(eli) and Saxicolous(eli) -> Hammered(eli)\n\nHammered(nathaniel)\n\nHammered(nathaniel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1177"} {"premises": "The roseann bestride the clive. The roseann is hoary. The roseann is destroyed. The roseann allow the clive. The roseann allow the rosabella. The roseann bejewel the clive. The roseann bejewel the rosabella. The clive bestride the roseann. The clive allow the roseann. The clive bejewel the rosabella. The rosabella bestride the roseann. The rosabella is halting. The rosabella is gullible. The rosabella is destroyed. The rosabella allow the clive. The rosabella bejewel the clive. If something bestride the rosabella then it allow the clive. If something bejewel the roseann then the roseann bestride the rosabella. If something bejewel the roseann then the roseann bestride the clive. Big things are destroyed. If something allow the clive then it bestride the clive. If something bestride the clive and it is halting then the clive bejewel the roseann. If something allow the roseann then the roseann is humbling. If something allow the roseann then it is hoary. The roseann is hoary.", "logic": "\nBestride(roseann, clive)\nHoary(roseann)\nDestroyed(roseann)\nAllow(roseann, clive)\nAllow(roseann, rosabella)\nBejewel(roseann, clive)\nBejewel(roseann, rosabella)\nBestride(clive, roseann)\nAllow(clive, roseann)\nBejewel(clive, rosabella)\nBestride(rosabella, roseann)\nHalting(rosabella)\nGullible(rosabella)\nDestroyed(rosabella)\nAllow(rosabella, clive)\nBejewel(rosabella, clive)\nforall x (Bestride(x, rosabella) -> Allow(x, clive))\nforall x (Bejewel(x, roseann) -> Bestride(roseann, rosabella))\nforall x (Bejewel(x, roseann) -> Bestride(roseann, clive))\nforall x (Halting(x) -> Destroyed(x))\nforall x (Allow(x, clive) -> Bestride(x, clive))\nforall x (Bestride(x, clive) and Halting(x) -> Bejewel(clive, roseann))\nforall x (Allow(x, roseann) -> Humbling(roseann))\nforall x (Allow(x, roseann) -> Hoary(x))\n\nHoary(roseann)\n\ntherefore Hoary(roseann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The mitchel moisten the fonsie. The mitchel is analog. The mitchel is ferned. The mitchel drift the fonsie. The mitchel drift the dian. The mitchel stomach the fonsie. The mitchel stomach the dian. The fonsie moisten the mitchel. The fonsie drift the mitchel. The fonsie stomach the dian. The dian moisten the mitchel. The dian is obscene. The dian is winy. The dian is ferned. The dian drift the fonsie. The dian stomach the fonsie. If something moisten the dian then it drift the fonsie. If something stomach the mitchel then the mitchel moisten the dian. If something stomach the mitchel then the mitchel moisten the fonsie. Big things are ferned. If something drift the fonsie then it moisten the fonsie. If something moisten the fonsie and it is obscene then the fonsie stomach the mitchel. If something drift the mitchel then the mitchel is duplex. If something drift the mitchel then it is analog. The fonsie does not like the mitchel.", "logic": "\nMoisten(mitchel, fonsie)\nAnalog(mitchel)\nFerned(mitchel)\nDrift(mitchel, fonsie)\nDrift(mitchel, dian)\nStomach(mitchel, fonsie)\nStomach(mitchel, dian)\nMoisten(fonsie, mitchel)\nDrift(fonsie, mitchel)\nStomach(fonsie, dian)\nMoisten(dian, mitchel)\nObscene(dian)\nWiny(dian)\nFerned(dian)\nDrift(dian, fonsie)\nStomach(dian, fonsie)\nforall x (Moisten(x, dian) -> Drift(x, fonsie))\nforall x (Stomach(x, mitchel) -> Moisten(mitchel, dian))\nforall x (Stomach(x, mitchel) -> Moisten(mitchel, fonsie))\nforall x (Obscene(x) -> Ferned(x))\nforall x (Drift(x, fonsie) -> Moisten(x, fonsie))\nforall x (Moisten(x, fonsie) and Obscene(x) -> Stomach(fonsie, mitchel))\nforall x (Drift(x, mitchel) -> Duplex(mitchel))\nforall x (Drift(x, mitchel) -> Analog(x))\n\nnot Drift(fonsie, mitchel)\n\ntherefore Drift(fonsie, mitchel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The jazmin understock the libby. The jazmin is legitimate. The jazmin is beady. The jazmin unhand the libby. The jazmin unhand the hynda. The jazmin outmatch the libby. The jazmin outmatch the hynda. The libby understock the jazmin. The libby unhand the jazmin. The libby outmatch the hynda. The hynda understock the jazmin. The hynda is glum. The hynda is esthetic. The hynda is beady. The hynda unhand the libby. The hynda outmatch the libby. If something understock the hynda then it unhand the libby. If something outmatch the jazmin then the jazmin understock the hynda. If something outmatch the jazmin then the jazmin understock the libby. Big things are beady. If something unhand the libby then it understock the libby. If something understock the libby and it is glum then the libby outmatch the jazmin. If something unhand the jazmin then the jazmin is draconian. If something unhand the jazmin then it is legitimate. The jazmin is draconian.", "logic": "\nUnderstock(jazmin, libby)\nLegitimate(jazmin)\nBeady(jazmin)\nUnhand(jazmin, libby)\nUnhand(jazmin, hynda)\nOutmatch(jazmin, libby)\nOutmatch(jazmin, hynda)\nUnderstock(libby, jazmin)\nUnhand(libby, jazmin)\nOutmatch(libby, hynda)\nUnderstock(hynda, jazmin)\nGlum(hynda)\nEsthetic(hynda)\nBeady(hynda)\nUnhand(hynda, libby)\nOutmatch(hynda, libby)\nforall x (Understock(x, hynda) -> Unhand(x, libby))\nforall x (Outmatch(x, jazmin) -> Understock(jazmin, hynda))\nforall x (Outmatch(x, jazmin) -> Understock(jazmin, libby))\nforall x (Glum(x) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Unhand(x, libby) -> Understock(x, libby))\nforall x (Understock(x, libby) and Glum(x) -> Outmatch(libby, jazmin))\nforall x (Unhand(x, jazmin) -> Draconian(jazmin))\nforall x (Unhand(x, jazmin) -> Legitimate(x))\n\nDraconian(jazmin)\n\nUnhand(libby, jazmin) and forall x (Unhand(x, jazmin) -> Draconian(jazmin)) -> therefore Draconian(jazmin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The annemarie speechify the bird. The annemarie is wedged. The annemarie is starkers. The annemarie finish the bird. The annemarie finish the gershon. The annemarie recharge the bird. The annemarie recharge the gershon. The bird speechify the annemarie. The bird finish the annemarie. The bird recharge the gershon. The gershon speechify the annemarie. The gershon is intramural. The gershon is choleraic. The gershon is starkers. The gershon finish the bird. The gershon recharge the bird. If something speechify the gershon then it finish the bird. If something recharge the annemarie then the annemarie speechify the gershon. If something recharge the annemarie then the annemarie speechify the bird. Big things are starkers. If something finish the bird then it speechify the bird. If something speechify the bird and it is intramural then the bird recharge the annemarie. If something finish the annemarie then the annemarie is hypotonic. If something finish the annemarie then it is wedged. The annemarie is not hypotonic.", "logic": "\nSpeechify(annemarie, bird)\nWedged(annemarie)\nStarkers(annemarie)\nFinish(annemarie, bird)\nFinish(annemarie, gershon)\nRecharge(annemarie, bird)\nRecharge(annemarie, gershon)\nSpeechify(bird, annemarie)\nFinish(bird, annemarie)\nRecharge(bird, gershon)\nSpeechify(gershon, annemarie)\nIntramural(gershon)\nCholeraic(gershon)\nStarkers(gershon)\nFinish(gershon, bird)\nRecharge(gershon, bird)\nforall x (Speechify(x, gershon) -> Finish(x, bird))\nforall x (Recharge(x, annemarie) -> Speechify(annemarie, gershon))\nforall x (Recharge(x, annemarie) -> Speechify(annemarie, bird))\nforall x (Intramural(x) -> Starkers(x))\nforall x (Finish(x, bird) -> Speechify(x, bird))\nforall x (Speechify(x, bird) and Intramural(x) -> Recharge(bird, annemarie))\nforall x (Finish(x, annemarie) -> Hypotonic(annemarie))\nforall x (Finish(x, annemarie) -> Wedged(x))\n\nnot Hypotonic(annemarie)\n\nFinish(bird, annemarie) and forall x (Finish(x, annemarie) -> Hypotonic(annemarie)) -> therefore Hypotonic(annemarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The leeann engulf the tricia. The leeann is becalmed. The leeann is inbred. The leeann recurve the tricia. The leeann recurve the brant. The leeann disport the tricia. The leeann disport the brant. The tricia engulf the leeann. The tricia recurve the leeann. The tricia disport the brant. The brant engulf the leeann. The brant is unavailing. The brant is divorced. The brant is inbred. The brant recurve the tricia. The brant disport the tricia. If something engulf the brant then it recurve the tricia. If something disport the leeann then the leeann engulf the brant. If something disport the leeann then the leeann engulf the tricia. Big things are inbred. If something recurve the tricia then it engulf the tricia. If something engulf the tricia and it is unavailing then the tricia disport the leeann. If something recurve the leeann then the leeann is referent. If something recurve the leeann then it is becalmed. The tricia disport the leeann.", "logic": "\nEngulf(leeann, tricia)\nBecalmed(leeann)\nInbred(leeann)\nRecurve(leeann, tricia)\nRecurve(leeann, brant)\nDisport(leeann, tricia)\nDisport(leeann, brant)\nEngulf(tricia, leeann)\nRecurve(tricia, leeann)\nDisport(tricia, brant)\nEngulf(brant, leeann)\nUnavailing(brant)\nDivorced(brant)\nInbred(brant)\nRecurve(brant, tricia)\nDisport(brant, tricia)\nforall x (Engulf(x, brant) -> Recurve(x, tricia))\nforall x (Disport(x, leeann) -> Engulf(leeann, brant))\nforall x (Disport(x, leeann) -> Engulf(leeann, tricia))\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Inbred(x))\nforall x (Recurve(x, tricia) -> Engulf(x, tricia))\nforall x (Engulf(x, tricia) and Unavailing(x) -> Disport(tricia, leeann))\nforall x (Recurve(x, leeann) -> Referent(leeann))\nforall x (Recurve(x, leeann) -> Becalmed(x))\n\nDisport(tricia, leeann)\n\nRecurve(brant, tricia) and forall x (Recurve(x, tricia) -> Engulf(x, tricia)) -> therefore Engulf(brant, tricia) Engulf(brant, tricia) and Unavailing(brant) and forall x (Engulf(x, tricia) and Unavailing(x) -> Disport(tricia, leeann)) -> therefore Disport(tricia, leeann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The case gawp the codee. The case is orphic. The case is mangy. The case equivocate the codee. The case equivocate the moore. The case incarnate the codee. The case incarnate the moore. The codee gawp the case. The codee equivocate the case. The codee incarnate the moore. The moore gawp the case. The moore is seismal. The moore is unshaped. The moore is mangy. The moore equivocate the codee. The moore incarnate the codee. If something gawp the moore then it equivocate the codee. If something incarnate the case then the case gawp the moore. If something incarnate the case then the case gawp the codee. Big things are mangy. If something equivocate the codee then it gawp the codee. If something gawp the codee and it is seismal then the codee incarnate the case. If something equivocate the case then the case is ameboid. If something equivocate the case then it is orphic. The codee does not see the case.", "logic": "\nGawp(case, codee)\nOrphic(case)\nMangy(case)\nEquivocate(case, codee)\nEquivocate(case, moore)\nIncarnate(case, codee)\nIncarnate(case, moore)\nGawp(codee, case)\nEquivocate(codee, case)\nIncarnate(codee, moore)\nGawp(moore, case)\nSeismal(moore)\nUnshaped(moore)\nMangy(moore)\nEquivocate(moore, codee)\nIncarnate(moore, codee)\nforall x (Gawp(x, moore) -> Equivocate(x, codee))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, case) -> Gawp(case, moore))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, case) -> Gawp(case, codee))\nforall x (Seismal(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Equivocate(x, codee) -> Gawp(x, codee))\nforall x (Gawp(x, codee) and Seismal(x) -> Incarnate(codee, case))\nforall x (Equivocate(x, case) -> Ameboid(case))\nforall x (Equivocate(x, case) -> Orphic(x))\n\nnot Incarnate(codee, case)\n\nEquivocate(moore, codee) and forall x (Equivocate(x, codee) -> Gawp(x, codee)) -> therefore Gawp(moore, codee) Gawp(moore, codee) and Seismal(moore) and forall x (Gawp(x, codee) and Seismal(x) -> Incarnate(codee, case)) -> therefore Incarnate(codee, case)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The tamarra overvalue the flo. The tamarra is bone. The tamarra is oaten. The tamarra decalcify the flo. The tamarra decalcify the harmonia. The tamarra fizzle the flo. The tamarra fizzle the harmonia. The flo overvalue the tamarra. The flo decalcify the tamarra. The flo fizzle the harmonia. The harmonia overvalue the tamarra. The harmonia is unplumbed. The harmonia is haitian. The harmonia is oaten. The harmonia decalcify the flo. The harmonia fizzle the flo. If something overvalue the harmonia then it decalcify the flo. If something fizzle the tamarra then the tamarra overvalue the harmonia. If something fizzle the tamarra then the tamarra overvalue the flo. Big things are oaten. If something decalcify the flo then it overvalue the flo. If something overvalue the flo and it is unplumbed then the flo fizzle the tamarra. If something decalcify the tamarra then the tamarra is mock. If something decalcify the tamarra then it is bone. The tamarra overvalue the harmonia.", "logic": "\nOvervalue(tamarra, flo)\nBone(tamarra)\nOaten(tamarra)\nDecalcify(tamarra, flo)\nDecalcify(tamarra, harmonia)\nFizzle(tamarra, flo)\nFizzle(tamarra, harmonia)\nOvervalue(flo, tamarra)\nDecalcify(flo, tamarra)\nFizzle(flo, harmonia)\nOvervalue(harmonia, tamarra)\nUnplumbed(harmonia)\nHaitian(harmonia)\nOaten(harmonia)\nDecalcify(harmonia, flo)\nFizzle(harmonia, flo)\nforall x (Overvalue(x, harmonia) -> Decalcify(x, flo))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, tamarra) -> Overvalue(tamarra, harmonia))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, tamarra) -> Overvalue(tamarra, flo))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) -> Oaten(x))\nforall x (Decalcify(x, flo) -> Overvalue(x, flo))\nforall x (Overvalue(x, flo) and Unplumbed(x) -> Fizzle(flo, tamarra))\nforall x (Decalcify(x, tamarra) -> Mock(tamarra))\nforall x (Decalcify(x, tamarra) -> Bone(x))\n\nOvervalue(tamarra, harmonia)\n\nDecalcify(harmonia, flo) and forall x (Decalcify(x, flo) -> Overvalue(x, flo)) -> therefore Overvalue(harmonia, flo) Overvalue(harmonia, flo) and Unplumbed(harmonia) and forall x (Overvalue(x, flo) and Unplumbed(x) -> Fizzle(flo, tamarra)) -> therefore Fizzle(flo, tamarra) Fizzle(flo, tamarra) and forall x (Fizzle(x, tamarra) -> Overvalue(tamarra, harmonia)) -> therefore Overvalue(tamarra, harmonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The osborn piece the abbot. The osborn is ceilinged. The osborn is scattered. The osborn extol the abbot. The osborn extol the helene. The osborn displease the abbot. The osborn displease the helene. The abbot piece the osborn. The abbot extol the osborn. The abbot displease the helene. The helene piece the osborn. The helene is australian. The helene is precast. The helene is scattered. The helene extol the abbot. The helene displease the abbot. If something piece the helene then it extol the abbot. If something displease the osborn then the osborn piece the helene. If something displease the osborn then the osborn piece the abbot. Big things are scattered. If something extol the abbot then it piece the abbot. If something piece the abbot and it is australian then the abbot displease the osborn. If something extol the osborn then the osborn is perversive. If something extol the osborn then it is ceilinged. The osborn does not eat the helene.", "logic": "\nPiece(osborn, abbot)\nCeilinged(osborn)\nScattered(osborn)\nExtol(osborn, abbot)\nExtol(osborn, helene)\nDisplease(osborn, abbot)\nDisplease(osborn, helene)\nPiece(abbot, osborn)\nExtol(abbot, osborn)\nDisplease(abbot, helene)\nPiece(helene, osborn)\nAustralian(helene)\nPrecast(helene)\nScattered(helene)\nExtol(helene, abbot)\nDisplease(helene, abbot)\nforall x (Piece(x, helene) -> Extol(x, abbot))\nforall x (Displease(x, osborn) -> Piece(osborn, helene))\nforall x (Displease(x, osborn) -> Piece(osborn, abbot))\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Scattered(x))\nforall x (Extol(x, abbot) -> Piece(x, abbot))\nforall x (Piece(x, abbot) and Australian(x) -> Displease(abbot, osborn))\nforall x (Extol(x, osborn) -> Perversive(osborn))\nforall x (Extol(x, osborn) -> Ceilinged(x))\n\nnot Piece(osborn, helene)\n\nExtol(helene, abbot) and forall x (Extol(x, abbot) -> Piece(x, abbot)) -> therefore Piece(helene, abbot) Piece(helene, abbot) and Australian(helene) and forall x (Piece(x, abbot) and Australian(x) -> Displease(abbot, osborn)) -> therefore Displease(abbot, osborn) Displease(abbot, osborn) and forall x (Displease(x, osborn) -> Piece(osborn, helene)) -> therefore Piece(osborn, helene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The derek wench the gypsy. The derek is pyrogallic. The derek is virtuous. The derek emanate the gypsy. The derek emanate the elisa. The derek bootleg the gypsy. The derek bootleg the elisa. The gypsy wench the derek. The gypsy emanate the derek. The gypsy bootleg the elisa. The elisa wench the derek. The elisa is heavy. The elisa is faced. The elisa is virtuous. The elisa emanate the gypsy. The elisa bootleg the gypsy. If something wench the elisa then it emanate the gypsy. If something bootleg the derek then the derek wench the elisa. If something bootleg the derek then the derek wench the gypsy. Big things are virtuous. If something emanate the gypsy then it wench the gypsy. If something wench the gypsy and it is heavy then the gypsy bootleg the derek. If something emanate the derek then the derek is libidinal. If something emanate the derek then it is pyrogallic. The gypsy is not virtuous.", "logic": "\nWench(derek, gypsy)\nPyrogallic(derek)\nVirtuous(derek)\nEmanate(derek, gypsy)\nEmanate(derek, elisa)\nBootleg(derek, gypsy)\nBootleg(derek, elisa)\nWench(gypsy, derek)\nEmanate(gypsy, derek)\nBootleg(gypsy, elisa)\nWench(elisa, derek)\nHeavy(elisa)\nFaced(elisa)\nVirtuous(elisa)\nEmanate(elisa, gypsy)\nBootleg(elisa, gypsy)\nforall x (Wench(x, elisa) -> Emanate(x, gypsy))\nforall x (Bootleg(x, derek) -> Wench(derek, elisa))\nforall x (Bootleg(x, derek) -> Wench(derek, gypsy))\nforall x (Heavy(x) -> Virtuous(x))\nforall x (Emanate(x, gypsy) -> Wench(x, gypsy))\nforall x (Wench(x, gypsy) and Heavy(x) -> Bootleg(gypsy, derek))\nforall x (Emanate(x, derek) -> Libidinal(derek))\nforall x (Emanate(x, derek) -> Pyrogallic(x))\n\nnot Virtuous(gypsy)\n\nforall x (Heavy(x) -> Virtuous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The penny automatise the karyl. The penny is bungling. The penny is billowy. The penny disrupt the karyl. The penny disrupt the shell. The penny spoof the karyl. The penny spoof the shell. The karyl automatise the penny. The karyl disrupt the penny. The karyl spoof the shell. The shell automatise the penny. The shell is subjective. The shell is baccate. The shell is billowy. The shell disrupt the karyl. The shell spoof the karyl. If something automatise the shell then it disrupt the karyl. If something spoof the penny then the penny automatise the shell. If something spoof the penny then the penny automatise the karyl. Big things are billowy. If something disrupt the karyl then it automatise the karyl. If something automatise the karyl and it is subjective then the karyl spoof the penny. If something disrupt the penny then the penny is chatoyant. If something disrupt the penny then it is bungling. The shell is bungling.", "logic": "\nAutomatise(penny, karyl)\nBungling(penny)\nBillowy(penny)\nDisrupt(penny, karyl)\nDisrupt(penny, shell)\nSpoof(penny, karyl)\nSpoof(penny, shell)\nAutomatise(karyl, penny)\nDisrupt(karyl, penny)\nSpoof(karyl, shell)\nAutomatise(shell, penny)\nSubjective(shell)\nBaccate(shell)\nBillowy(shell)\nDisrupt(shell, karyl)\nSpoof(shell, karyl)\nforall x (Automatise(x, shell) -> Disrupt(x, karyl))\nforall x (Spoof(x, penny) -> Automatise(penny, shell))\nforall x (Spoof(x, penny) -> Automatise(penny, karyl))\nforall x (Subjective(x) -> Billowy(x))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, karyl) -> Automatise(x, karyl))\nforall x (Automatise(x, karyl) and Subjective(x) -> Spoof(karyl, penny))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, penny) -> Chatoyant(penny))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, penny) -> Bungling(x))\n\nBungling(shell)\n\nforall x (Disrupt(x, penny) -> Bungling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The shlomo tweedle the romeo. The shlomo is advertised. The shlomo is submissive. The shlomo reassemble the romeo. The shlomo reassemble the dido. The shlomo haggle the romeo. The shlomo haggle the dido. The romeo tweedle the shlomo. The romeo reassemble the shlomo. The romeo haggle the dido. The dido tweedle the shlomo. The dido is ascetic. The dido is bountiful. The dido is submissive. The dido reassemble the romeo. The dido haggle the romeo. If something tweedle the dido then it reassemble the romeo. If something haggle the shlomo then the shlomo tweedle the dido. If something haggle the shlomo then the shlomo tweedle the romeo. Big things are submissive. If something reassemble the romeo then it tweedle the romeo. If something tweedle the romeo and it is ascetic then the romeo haggle the shlomo. If something reassemble the shlomo then the shlomo is sexist. If something reassemble the shlomo then it is advertised. The romeo does not like the romeo.", "logic": "\nTweedle(shlomo, romeo)\nAdvertised(shlomo)\nSubmissive(shlomo)\nReassemble(shlomo, romeo)\nReassemble(shlomo, dido)\nHaggle(shlomo, romeo)\nHaggle(shlomo, dido)\nTweedle(romeo, shlomo)\nReassemble(romeo, shlomo)\nHaggle(romeo, dido)\nTweedle(dido, shlomo)\nAscetic(dido)\nBountiful(dido)\nSubmissive(dido)\nReassemble(dido, romeo)\nHaggle(dido, romeo)\nforall x (Tweedle(x, dido) -> Reassemble(x, romeo))\nforall x (Haggle(x, shlomo) -> Tweedle(shlomo, dido))\nforall x (Haggle(x, shlomo) -> Tweedle(shlomo, romeo))\nforall x (Ascetic(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, romeo) -> Tweedle(x, romeo))\nforall x (Tweedle(x, romeo) and Ascetic(x) -> Haggle(romeo, shlomo))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, shlomo) -> Sexist(shlomo))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, shlomo) -> Advertised(x))\n\nnot Reassemble(romeo, romeo)\n\nforall x (Tweedle(x, dido) -> Reassemble(x, romeo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The ilona beseem the friedric. The ilona is pasted. The ilona is dominated. The ilona glass the friedric. The ilona glass the feliza. The ilona emerge the friedric. The ilona emerge the feliza. The friedric beseem the ilona. The friedric glass the ilona. The friedric emerge the feliza. The feliza beseem the ilona. The feliza is centered. The feliza is threatened. The feliza is dominated. The feliza glass the friedric. The feliza emerge the friedric. If something beseem the feliza then it glass the friedric. If something emerge the ilona then the ilona beseem the feliza. If something emerge the ilona then the ilona beseem the friedric. Big things are dominated. If something glass the friedric then it beseem the friedric. If something beseem the friedric and it is centered then the friedric emerge the ilona. If something glass the ilona then the ilona is oblong. If something glass the ilona then it is pasted. The friedric beseem the friedric.", "logic": "\nBeseem(ilona, friedric)\nPasted(ilona)\nDominated(ilona)\nGlass(ilona, friedric)\nGlass(ilona, feliza)\nEmerge(ilona, friedric)\nEmerge(ilona, feliza)\nBeseem(friedric, ilona)\nGlass(friedric, ilona)\nEmerge(friedric, feliza)\nBeseem(feliza, ilona)\nCentered(feliza)\nThreatened(feliza)\nDominated(feliza)\nGlass(feliza, friedric)\nEmerge(feliza, friedric)\nforall x (Beseem(x, feliza) -> Glass(x, friedric))\nforall x (Emerge(x, ilona) -> Beseem(ilona, feliza))\nforall x (Emerge(x, ilona) -> Beseem(ilona, friedric))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Dominated(x))\nforall x (Glass(x, friedric) -> Beseem(x, friedric))\nforall x (Beseem(x, friedric) and Centered(x) -> Emerge(friedric, ilona))\nforall x (Glass(x, ilona) -> Oblong(ilona))\nforall x (Glass(x, ilona) -> Pasted(x))\n\nBeseem(friedric, friedric)\n\nforall x (Glass(x, friedric) -> Beseem(x, friedric)) <- forall x (Beseem(x, feliza) -> Glass(x, friedric)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The junie disk the reiko. The junie is unrested. The junie is stalked. The junie hunker the reiko. The junie hunker the vivianna. The junie reassure the reiko. The junie reassure the vivianna. The reiko disk the junie. The reiko hunker the junie. The reiko reassure the vivianna. The vivianna disk the junie. The vivianna is squatty. The vivianna is sweltry. The vivianna is stalked. The vivianna hunker the reiko. The vivianna reassure the reiko. If something disk the vivianna then it hunker the reiko. If something reassure the junie then the junie disk the vivianna. If something reassure the junie then the junie disk the reiko. Big things are stalked. If something hunker the reiko then it disk the reiko. If something disk the reiko and it is squatty then the reiko reassure the junie. If something hunker the junie then the junie is steamy. If something hunker the junie then it is unrested. The reiko is not steamy.", "logic": "\nDisk(junie, reiko)\nUnrested(junie)\nStalked(junie)\nHunker(junie, reiko)\nHunker(junie, vivianna)\nReassure(junie, reiko)\nReassure(junie, vivianna)\nDisk(reiko, junie)\nHunker(reiko, junie)\nReassure(reiko, vivianna)\nDisk(vivianna, junie)\nSquatty(vivianna)\nSweltry(vivianna)\nStalked(vivianna)\nHunker(vivianna, reiko)\nReassure(vivianna, reiko)\nforall x (Disk(x, vivianna) -> Hunker(x, reiko))\nforall x (Reassure(x, junie) -> Disk(junie, vivianna))\nforall x (Reassure(x, junie) -> Disk(junie, reiko))\nforall x (Squatty(x) -> Stalked(x))\nforall x (Hunker(x, reiko) -> Disk(x, reiko))\nforall x (Disk(x, reiko) and Squatty(x) -> Reassure(reiko, junie))\nforall x (Hunker(x, junie) -> Steamy(junie))\nforall x (Hunker(x, junie) -> Unrested(x))\n\nnot Steamy(reiko)\n\nnot Steamy(reiko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The clarisse constitute the wendel. The clarisse is more. The clarisse is redolent. The clarisse transmit the wendel. The clarisse transmit the liam. The clarisse except the wendel. The clarisse except the liam. The wendel constitute the clarisse. The wendel transmit the clarisse. The wendel except the liam. The liam constitute the clarisse. The liam is pessimum. The liam is milkless. The liam is redolent. The liam transmit the wendel. The liam except the wendel. If something constitute the liam then it transmit the wendel. If something except the clarisse then the clarisse constitute the liam. If something except the clarisse then the clarisse constitute the wendel. Big things are redolent. If something transmit the wendel then it constitute the wendel. If something constitute the wendel and it is pessimum then the wendel except the clarisse. If something transmit the clarisse then the clarisse is palsied. If something transmit the clarisse then it is more. The clarisse constitute the clarisse.", "logic": "\nConstitute(clarisse, wendel)\nMore(clarisse)\nRedolent(clarisse)\nTransmit(clarisse, wendel)\nTransmit(clarisse, liam)\nExcept(clarisse, wendel)\nExcept(clarisse, liam)\nConstitute(wendel, clarisse)\nTransmit(wendel, clarisse)\nExcept(wendel, liam)\nConstitute(liam, clarisse)\nPessimum(liam)\nMilkless(liam)\nRedolent(liam)\nTransmit(liam, wendel)\nExcept(liam, wendel)\nforall x (Constitute(x, liam) -> Transmit(x, wendel))\nforall x (Except(x, clarisse) -> Constitute(clarisse, liam))\nforall x (Except(x, clarisse) -> Constitute(clarisse, wendel))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Transmit(x, wendel) -> Constitute(x, wendel))\nforall x (Constitute(x, wendel) and Pessimum(x) -> Except(wendel, clarisse))\nforall x (Transmit(x, clarisse) -> Palsied(clarisse))\nforall x (Transmit(x, clarisse) -> More(x))\n\nConstitute(clarisse, clarisse)\n\nConstitute(clarisse, clarisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The herby overvalue the myriam. The herby is unbowed. The herby is cool. The herby alkalize the myriam. The herby alkalize the alexa. The herby coldcock the myriam. The herby coldcock the alexa. The myriam overvalue the herby. The myriam alkalize the herby. The myriam coldcock the alexa. The alexa overvalue the herby. The alexa is amoebous. The alexa is christlike. The alexa is cool. The alexa alkalize the myriam. The alexa coldcock the myriam. If something overvalue the alexa then it alkalize the myriam. If something coldcock the herby then the herby overvalue the alexa. If something coldcock the herby then the herby overvalue the myriam. Big things are cool. If something alkalize the myriam then it overvalue the myriam. If something overvalue the myriam and it is amoebous then the myriam coldcock the herby. If something alkalize the herby then the herby is togged. If something alkalize the herby then it is unbowed. The alexa does not see the herby.", "logic": "\nOvervalue(herby, myriam)\nUnbowed(herby)\nCool(herby)\nAlkalize(herby, myriam)\nAlkalize(herby, alexa)\nColdcock(herby, myriam)\nColdcock(herby, alexa)\nOvervalue(myriam, herby)\nAlkalize(myriam, herby)\nColdcock(myriam, alexa)\nOvervalue(alexa, herby)\nAmoebous(alexa)\nChristlike(alexa)\nCool(alexa)\nAlkalize(alexa, myriam)\nColdcock(alexa, myriam)\nforall x (Overvalue(x, alexa) -> Alkalize(x, myriam))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, herby) -> Overvalue(herby, alexa))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, herby) -> Overvalue(herby, myriam))\nforall x (Amoebous(x) -> Cool(x))\nforall x (Alkalize(x, myriam) -> Overvalue(x, myriam))\nforall x (Overvalue(x, myriam) and Amoebous(x) -> Coldcock(myriam, herby))\nforall x (Alkalize(x, herby) -> Togged(herby))\nforall x (Alkalize(x, herby) -> Unbowed(x))\n\nnot Coldcock(alexa, herby)\n\nnot Coldcock(alexa, herby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "The alica rollick the garvin. The alica is floral. The alica is cetaceous. The alica sicken the garvin. The alica sicken the art. The alica sieve the garvin. The alica sieve the art. The garvin rollick the alica. The garvin sicken the alica. The garvin sieve the art. The art rollick the alica. The art is isosceles. The art is grumpy. The art is cetaceous. The art sicken the garvin. The art sieve the garvin. If something rollick the art then it sicken the garvin. If something sieve the alica then the alica rollick the art. If something sieve the alica then the alica rollick the garvin. Big things are cetaceous. If something sicken the garvin then it rollick the garvin. If something rollick the garvin and it is isosceles then the garvin sieve the alica. If something sicken the alica then the alica is energising. If something sicken the alica then it is floral. The art is energising.", "logic": "\nRollick(alica, garvin)\nFloral(alica)\nCetaceous(alica)\nSicken(alica, garvin)\nSicken(alica, art)\nSieve(alica, garvin)\nSieve(alica, art)\nRollick(garvin, alica)\nSicken(garvin, alica)\nSieve(garvin, art)\nRollick(art, alica)\nIsosceles(art)\nGrumpy(art)\nCetaceous(art)\nSicken(art, garvin)\nSieve(art, garvin)\nforall x (Rollick(x, art) -> Sicken(x, garvin))\nforall x (Sieve(x, alica) -> Rollick(alica, art))\nforall x (Sieve(x, alica) -> Rollick(alica, garvin))\nforall x (Isosceles(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\nforall x (Sicken(x, garvin) -> Rollick(x, garvin))\nforall x (Rollick(x, garvin) and Isosceles(x) -> Sieve(garvin, alica))\nforall x (Sicken(x, alica) -> Energising(alica))\nforall x (Sicken(x, alica) -> Floral(x))\n\nEnergising(art)\n\nEnergising(art) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-388"} {"premises": "Barrett is collagenic. Pavia is piggy. Marry is asserting. If someone is asserting and lobed then they are not egocentric. All fleshly people are egocentric. All collagenic, piggy people are not lobed. Nice people are not lobed. If Barrett is piggy then Barrett is fleshly. All lobed people are collagenic. If someone is collagenic and fleshly then they are piggy. If someone is egocentric and piggy then they are not fleshly. Barrett is collagenic.", "logic": "\nCollagenic(barrett)\nPiggy(pavia)\nAsserting(marry)\nforall x (Asserting(x) and Lobed(x) -> not Egocentric(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) -> Egocentric(x))\nforall x (Collagenic(x) and Piggy(x) -> not Lobed(x))\nforall x (Piggy(x) -> not Lobed(x))\nPiggy(barrett) -> Fleshly(barrett)\nforall x (Lobed(x) -> Collagenic(x))\nforall x (Collagenic(x) and Fleshly(x) -> Piggy(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and Piggy(x) -> not Fleshly(x))\n\nCollagenic(barrett)\n\ntherefore Collagenic(barrett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "Sawyer is scratchy. Tremain is genuine. Phillip is accented. If someone is accented and goodly then they are not involved. All freaky people are involved. All scratchy, genuine people are not goodly. Nice people are not goodly. If Sawyer is genuine then Sawyer is freaky. All goodly people are scratchy. If someone is scratchy and freaky then they are genuine. If someone is involved and genuine then they are not freaky. Phillip is not accented.", "logic": "\nScratchy(sawyer)\nGenuine(tremain)\nAccented(phillip)\nforall x (Accented(x) and Goodly(x) -> not Involved(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Genuine(x) -> not Goodly(x))\nforall x (Genuine(x) -> not Goodly(x))\nGenuine(sawyer) -> Freaky(sawyer)\nforall x (Goodly(x) -> Scratchy(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Freaky(x) -> Genuine(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) and Genuine(x) -> not Freaky(x))\n\nnot Accented(phillip)\n\ntherefore Accented(phillip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "Berkie is humdrum. Conni is strategic. Randa is mediate. If someone is mediate and elaborated then they are not carefree. All bigamous people are carefree. All humdrum, strategic people are not elaborated. Nice people are not elaborated. If Berkie is strategic then Berkie is bigamous. All elaborated people are humdrum. If someone is humdrum and bigamous then they are strategic. If someone is carefree and strategic then they are not bigamous. Conni is not elaborated.", "logic": "\nHumdrum(berkie)\nStrategic(conni)\nMediate(randa)\nforall x (Mediate(x) and Elaborated(x) -> not Carefree(x))\nforall x (Bigamous(x) -> Carefree(x))\nforall x (Humdrum(x) and Strategic(x) -> not Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Strategic(x) -> not Elaborated(x))\nStrategic(berkie) -> Bigamous(berkie)\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Humdrum(x))\nforall x (Humdrum(x) and Bigamous(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Strategic(x) -> not Bigamous(x))\n\nnot Elaborated(conni)\n\nStrategic(conni) and forall x (Strategic(x) -> not Elaborated(x)) -> therefore not Elaborated(conni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "Marybeth is clotted. Charlotta is stuporous. Celestine is retarded. If someone is retarded and truncated then they are not unbound. All surplus people are unbound. All clotted, stuporous people are not truncated. Nice people are not truncated. If Marybeth is stuporous then Marybeth is surplus. All truncated people are clotted. If someone is clotted and surplus then they are stuporous. If someone is unbound and stuporous then they are not surplus. Charlotta is truncated.", "logic": "\nClotted(marybeth)\nStuporous(charlotta)\nRetarded(celestine)\nforall x (Retarded(x) and Truncated(x) -> not Unbound(x))\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Unbound(x))\nforall x (Clotted(x) and Stuporous(x) -> not Truncated(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) -> not Truncated(x))\nStuporous(marybeth) -> Surplus(marybeth)\nforall x (Truncated(x) -> Clotted(x))\nforall x (Clotted(x) and Surplus(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) and Stuporous(x) -> not Surplus(x))\n\nTruncated(charlotta)\n\nStuporous(charlotta) and forall x (Stuporous(x) -> not Truncated(x)) -> therefore not Truncated(charlotta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "Cortese is unabated. Idelle is nebulose. Donnie is deflated. If someone is deflated and normal then they are not taut. All prosperous people are taut. All unabated, nebulose people are not normal. Nice people are not normal. If Cortese is nebulose then Cortese is prosperous. All normal people are unabated. If someone is unabated and prosperous then they are nebulose. If someone is taut and nebulose then they are not prosperous. Donnie is not unabated.", "logic": "\nUnabated(cortese)\nNebulose(idelle)\nDeflated(donnie)\nforall x (Deflated(x) and Normal(x) -> not Taut(x))\nforall x (Prosperous(x) -> Taut(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) and Nebulose(x) -> not Normal(x))\nforall x (Nebulose(x) -> not Normal(x))\nNebulose(cortese) -> Prosperous(cortese)\nforall x (Normal(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) and Prosperous(x) -> Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Taut(x) and Nebulose(x) -> not Prosperous(x))\n\nnot Unabated(donnie)\n\nforall x (Normal(x) -> Unabated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "Coleman is uppermost. Alisa is fragile. Arlyne is remediable. If someone is remediable and conjugate then they are not rheologic. All vindicated people are rheologic. All uppermost, fragile people are not conjugate. Nice people are not conjugate. If Coleman is fragile then Coleman is vindicated. All conjugate people are uppermost. If someone is uppermost and vindicated then they are fragile. If someone is rheologic and fragile then they are not vindicated. Alisa is rheologic.", "logic": "\nUppermost(coleman)\nFragile(alisa)\nRemediable(arlyne)\nforall x (Remediable(x) and Conjugate(x) -> not Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Vindicated(x) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Uppermost(x) and Fragile(x) -> not Conjugate(x))\nforall x (Fragile(x) -> not Conjugate(x))\nFragile(coleman) -> Vindicated(coleman)\nforall x (Conjugate(x) -> Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Uppermost(x) and Vindicated(x) -> Fragile(x))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Fragile(x) -> not Vindicated(x))\n\nRheologic(alisa)\n\nforall x (Vindicated(x) -> Rheologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "Renelle is various. Bekki is unwearied. Carolyn is dismissed. If someone is dismissed and civic then they are not cyprinid. All equable people are cyprinid. All various, unwearied people are not civic. Nice people are not civic. If Renelle is unwearied then Renelle is equable. All civic people are various. If someone is various and equable then they are unwearied. If someone is cyprinid and unwearied then they are not equable. Carolyn is not civic.", "logic": "\nVarious(renelle)\nUnwearied(bekki)\nDismissed(carolyn)\nforall x (Dismissed(x) and Civic(x) -> not Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Equable(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Various(x) and Unwearied(x) -> not Civic(x))\nforall x (Unwearied(x) -> not Civic(x))\nUnwearied(renelle) -> Equable(renelle)\nforall x (Civic(x) -> Various(x))\nforall x (Various(x) and Equable(x) -> Unwearied(x))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Unwearied(x) -> not Equable(x))\n\nnot Civic(carolyn)\n\nnot Civic(carolyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "Alexei is brachial. Davoud is impeccable. Luna is baptised. If someone is baptised and rimeless then they are not vivid. All obese people are vivid. All brachial, impeccable people are not rimeless. Nice people are not rimeless. If Alexei is impeccable then Alexei is obese. All rimeless people are brachial. If someone is brachial and obese then they are impeccable. If someone is vivid and impeccable then they are not obese. Davoud is obese.", "logic": "\nBrachial(alexei)\nImpeccable(davoud)\nBaptised(luna)\nforall x (Baptised(x) and Rimeless(x) -> not Vivid(x))\nforall x (Obese(x) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Impeccable(x) -> not Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Impeccable(x) -> not Rimeless(x))\nImpeccable(alexei) -> Obese(alexei)\nforall x (Rimeless(x) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Obese(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Vivid(x) and Impeccable(x) -> not Obese(x))\n\nObese(davoud)\n\nObese(davoud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2767"} {"premises": "The lian is unuttered. The colbert is not vaned. If someone tramp the colbert then they are unuttered. If the lian crash the colbert then the colbert is unuttered. If someone is minimal then they visit the colbert. If the lian is unuttered then the lian crash the colbert. If someone crash the colbert and the colbert does not like the lian then the colbert tramp the lian. If someone crash the colbert then the colbert heave the lian. If someone heave the colbert then the colbert heave the lian. If the colbert is juicy and the colbert is not unuttered then the colbert heave the lian. The colbert is not vaned.", "logic": "\nUnuttered(lian)\nnot Vaned(colbert)\nforall x (Tramp(x, colbert) -> Unuttered(x))\nCrash(lian, colbert) -> Unuttered(colbert)\nforall x (Minimal(x) -> Tramp(x, colbert))\nUnuttered(lian) -> Crash(lian, colbert)\nforall x (Crash(x, colbert) and not Crash(colbert, lian) -> Tramp(colbert, lian))\nforall x (Crash(x, colbert) -> Heave(colbert, lian))\nforall x (Heave(x, colbert) -> Heave(colbert, lian))\nJuicy(colbert) and not Unuttered(colbert) -> Heave(colbert, lian)\n\nnot Vaned(colbert)\n\ntherefore not Vaned(colbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1522"} {"premises": "The timothea is flighty. The cris is not corrective. If someone conn the cris then they are flighty. If the timothea realise the cris then the cris is flighty. If someone is mortuary then they visit the cris. If the timothea is flighty then the timothea realise the cris. If someone realise the cris and the cris does not like the timothea then the cris conn the timothea. If someone realise the cris then the cris prioritise the timothea. If someone prioritise the cris then the cris prioritise the timothea. If the cris is javanese and the cris is not flighty then the cris prioritise the timothea. The timothea is not flighty.", "logic": "\nFlighty(timothea)\nnot Corrective(cris)\nforall x (Conn(x, cris) -> Flighty(x))\nRealise(timothea, cris) -> Flighty(cris)\nforall x (Mortuary(x) -> Conn(x, cris))\nFlighty(timothea) -> Realise(timothea, cris)\nforall x (Realise(x, cris) and not Realise(cris, timothea) -> Conn(cris, timothea))\nforall x (Realise(x, cris) -> Prioritise(cris, timothea))\nforall x (Prioritise(x, cris) -> Prioritise(cris, timothea))\nJavanese(cris) and not Flighty(cris) -> Prioritise(cris, timothea)\n\nnot Flighty(timothea)\n\ntherefore Flighty(timothea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1522"} {"premises": "The sollie is rheumatic. The auguste is not polyatomic. If someone debunk the auguste then they are rheumatic. If the sollie withhold the auguste then the auguste is rheumatic. If someone is proclaimed then they visit the auguste. If the sollie is rheumatic then the sollie withhold the auguste. If someone withhold the auguste and the auguste does not like the sollie then the auguste debunk the sollie. If someone withhold the auguste then the auguste plate the sollie. If someone plate the auguste then the auguste plate the sollie. If the auguste is streaked and the auguste is not rheumatic then the auguste plate the sollie. The auguste does not visit the sollie.", "logic": "\nRheumatic(sollie)\nnot Polyatomic(auguste)\nforall x (Debunk(x, auguste) -> Rheumatic(x))\nWithhold(sollie, auguste) -> Rheumatic(auguste)\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) -> Debunk(x, auguste))\nRheumatic(sollie) -> Withhold(sollie, auguste)\nforall x (Withhold(x, auguste) and not Withhold(auguste, sollie) -> Debunk(auguste, sollie))\nforall x (Withhold(x, auguste) -> Plate(auguste, sollie))\nforall x (Plate(x, auguste) -> Plate(auguste, sollie))\nStreaked(auguste) and not Rheumatic(auguste) -> Plate(auguste, sollie)\n\nnot Debunk(auguste, sollie)\n\nforall x (Withhold(x, auguste) and not Withhold(auguste, sollie) -> Debunk(auguste, sollie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1522"} {"premises": "The chariot is rakish. The maggy is not disfigured. If someone estivate the maggy then they are rakish. If the chariot extenuate the maggy then the maggy is rakish. If someone is unafraid then they visit the maggy. If the chariot is rakish then the chariot extenuate the maggy. If someone extenuate the maggy and the maggy does not like the chariot then the maggy estivate the chariot. If someone extenuate the maggy then the maggy odorize the chariot. If someone odorize the maggy then the maggy odorize the chariot. If the maggy is nifty and the maggy is not rakish then the maggy odorize the chariot. The maggy extenuate the chariot.", "logic": "\nRakish(chariot)\nnot Disfigured(maggy)\nforall x (Estivate(x, maggy) -> Rakish(x))\nExtenuate(chariot, maggy) -> Rakish(maggy)\nforall x (Unafraid(x) -> Estivate(x, maggy))\nRakish(chariot) -> Extenuate(chariot, maggy)\nforall x (Extenuate(x, maggy) and not Extenuate(maggy, chariot) -> Estivate(maggy, chariot))\nforall x (Extenuate(x, maggy) -> Odorize(maggy, chariot))\nforall x (Odorize(x, maggy) -> Odorize(maggy, chariot))\nNifty(maggy) and not Rakish(maggy) -> Odorize(maggy, chariot)\n\nExtenuate(maggy, chariot)\n\nExtenuate(maggy, chariot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1522"} {"premises": "Annmarie is amalgamate. Annmarie is improper. Philly is campanular. If something is gestural and not improper then it is campanular. If something is campanular then it is acidic. If something is excitant then it is gestural. All improper things are not excitant. All acidic things are excitant. If something is improper and not excitant then it is amalgamate. Annmarie is improper.", "logic": "\nAmalgamate(annmarie)\nImproper(annmarie)\nCampanular(philly)\nforall x (Gestural(x) and not Improper(x) -> Campanular(x))\nforall x (Campanular(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> Gestural(x))\nforall x (Improper(x) -> not Excitant(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Improper(x) and not Excitant(x) -> Amalgamate(x))\n\nImproper(annmarie)\n\ntherefore Improper(annmarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Hettie is tributary. Hettie is stomatal. Terza is trussed. If something is dendroid and not stomatal then it is trussed. If something is trussed then it is effluent. If something is bright then it is dendroid. All stomatal things are not bright. All effluent things are bright. If something is stomatal and not bright then it is tributary. Hettie is not stomatal.", "logic": "\nTributary(hettie)\nStomatal(hettie)\nTrussed(terza)\nforall x (Dendroid(x) and not Stomatal(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Effluent(x))\nforall x (Bright(x) -> Dendroid(x))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> not Bright(x))\nforall x (Effluent(x) -> Bright(x))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) and not Bright(x) -> Tributary(x))\n\nnot Stomatal(hettie)\n\ntherefore Stomatal(hettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Willdon is caruncular. Willdon is mastered. Arnoldo is romanist. If something is titular and not mastered then it is romanist. If something is romanist then it is aery. If something is vitalizing then it is titular. All mastered things are not vitalizing. All aery things are vitalizing. If something is mastered and not vitalizing then it is caruncular. Willdon is not vitalizing.", "logic": "\nCaruncular(willdon)\nMastered(willdon)\nRomanist(arnoldo)\nforall x (Titular(x) and not Mastered(x) -> Romanist(x))\nforall x (Romanist(x) -> Aery(x))\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> not Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Aery(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) and not Vitalizing(x) -> Caruncular(x))\n\nnot Vitalizing(willdon)\n\nMastered(willdon) and forall x (Mastered(x) -> not Vitalizing(x)) -> therefore not Vitalizing(willdon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Barbe is absolute. Barbe is guileless. Glenine is lank. If something is dirigible and not guileless then it is lank. If something is lank then it is ordinary. If something is crenate then it is dirigible. All guileless things are not crenate. All ordinary things are crenate. If something is guileless and not crenate then it is absolute. Glenine is not ordinary.", "logic": "\nAbsolute(barbe)\nGuileless(barbe)\nLank(glenine)\nforall x (Dirigible(x) and not Guileless(x) -> Lank(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) -> Ordinary(x))\nforall x (Crenate(x) -> Dirigible(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) -> not Crenate(x))\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> Crenate(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) and not Crenate(x) -> Absolute(x))\n\nnot Ordinary(glenine)\n\nLank(glenine) and forall x (Lank(x) -> Ordinary(x)) -> therefore Ordinary(glenine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Liane is reviving. Liane is paranoid. Sue is cycloid. If something is shuha and not paranoid then it is cycloid. If something is cycloid then it is nominated. If something is unlawful then it is shuha. All paranoid things are not unlawful. All nominated things are unlawful. If something is paranoid and not unlawful then it is reviving. Sue is unlawful.", "logic": "\nReviving(liane)\nParanoid(liane)\nCycloid(sue)\nforall x (Shuha(x) and not Paranoid(x) -> Cycloid(x))\nforall x (Cycloid(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Unlawful(x) -> Shuha(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) -> not Unlawful(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> Unlawful(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) and not Unlawful(x) -> Reviving(x))\n\nUnlawful(sue)\n\nCycloid(sue) and forall x (Cycloid(x) -> Nominated(x)) -> therefore Nominated(sue) Nominated(sue) and forall x (Nominated(x) -> Unlawful(x)) -> therefore Unlawful(sue)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Erik is dietetic. Erik is quack. Goldi is humped. If something is slowgoing and not quack then it is humped. If something is humped then it is dogmatic. If something is drifting then it is slowgoing. All quack things are not drifting. All dogmatic things are drifting. If something is quack and not drifting then it is dietetic. Goldi is not drifting.", "logic": "\nDietetic(erik)\nQuack(erik)\nHumped(goldi)\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) and not Quack(x) -> Humped(x))\nforall x (Humped(x) -> Dogmatic(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> Slowgoing(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) -> not Drifting(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Quack(x) and not Drifting(x) -> Dietetic(x))\n\nnot Drifting(goldi)\n\nHumped(goldi) and forall x (Humped(x) -> Dogmatic(x)) -> therefore Dogmatic(goldi) Dogmatic(goldi) and forall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Drifting(x)) -> therefore Drifting(goldi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Von is webbed. Von is cambial. Spense is plaguey. If something is threadlike and not cambial then it is plaguey. If something is plaguey then it is ahorseback. If something is woozy then it is threadlike. All cambial things are not woozy. All ahorseback things are woozy. If something is cambial and not woozy then it is webbed. Spense is threadlike.", "logic": "\nWebbed(von)\nCambial(von)\nPlaguey(spense)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and not Cambial(x) -> Plaguey(x))\nforall x (Plaguey(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Woozy(x) -> Threadlike(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) -> not Woozy(x))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> Woozy(x))\nforall x (Cambial(x) and not Woozy(x) -> Webbed(x))\n\nThreadlike(spense)\n\nPlaguey(spense) and forall x (Plaguey(x) -> Ahorseback(x)) -> therefore Ahorseback(spense) Ahorseback(spense) and forall x (Ahorseback(x) -> Woozy(x)) -> therefore Woozy(spense) Woozy(spense) and forall x (Woozy(x) -> Threadlike(x)) -> therefore Threadlike(spense)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Hatti is artificial. Hatti is decorous. Alysa is driving. If something is juridic and not decorous then it is driving. If something is driving then it is andalusian. If something is ocular then it is juridic. All decorous things are not ocular. All andalusian things are ocular. If something is decorous and not ocular then it is artificial. Alysa is not juridic.", "logic": "\nArtificial(hatti)\nDecorous(hatti)\nDriving(alysa)\nforall x (Juridic(x) and not Decorous(x) -> Driving(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) -> Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Ocular(x) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Decorous(x) -> not Ocular(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> Ocular(x))\nforall x (Decorous(x) and not Ocular(x) -> Artificial(x))\n\nnot Juridic(alysa)\n\nDriving(alysa) and forall x (Driving(x) -> Andalusian(x)) -> therefore Andalusian(alysa) Andalusian(alysa) and forall x (Andalusian(x) -> Ocular(x)) -> therefore Ocular(alysa) Ocular(alysa) and forall x (Ocular(x) -> Juridic(x)) -> therefore Juridic(alysa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Gen is diarrhetic. Gen is patronless. Jessie is lavish. If something is nautical and not patronless then it is lavish. If something is lavish then it is decreased. If something is closed then it is nautical. All patronless things are not closed. All decreased things are closed. If something is patronless and not closed then it is diarrhetic. Gen is not decreased.", "logic": "\nDiarrhetic(gen)\nPatronless(gen)\nLavish(jessie)\nforall x (Nautical(x) and not Patronless(x) -> Lavish(x))\nforall x (Lavish(x) -> Decreased(x))\nforall x (Closed(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Patronless(x) -> not Closed(x))\nforall x (Decreased(x) -> Closed(x))\nforall x (Patronless(x) and not Closed(x) -> Diarrhetic(x))\n\nnot Decreased(gen)\n\nforall x (Lavish(x) -> Decreased(x)) <- forall x (Nautical(x) and not Patronless(x) -> Lavish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Gena is unhatched. Gena is spiky. Chelsae is unshapen. If something is smoky and not spiky then it is unshapen. If something is unshapen then it is malleable. If something is grueling then it is smoky. All spiky things are not grueling. All malleable things are grueling. If something is spiky and not grueling then it is unhatched. Gena is unshapen.", "logic": "\nUnhatched(gena)\nSpiky(gena)\nUnshapen(chelsae)\nforall x (Smoky(x) and not Spiky(x) -> Unshapen(x))\nforall x (Unshapen(x) -> Malleable(x))\nforall x (Grueling(x) -> Smoky(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> not Grueling(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) -> Grueling(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) and not Grueling(x) -> Unhatched(x))\n\nUnshapen(gena)\n\nforall x (Smoky(x) and not Spiky(x) -> Unshapen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Darcy is stung. Darcy is downstream. Vassili is rising. If something is glaswegian and not downstream then it is rising. If something is rising then it is scopal. If something is lethargic then it is glaswegian. All downstream things are not lethargic. All scopal things are lethargic. If something is downstream and not lethargic then it is stung. Vassili is not stung.", "logic": "\nStung(darcy)\nDownstream(darcy)\nRising(vassili)\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) and not Downstream(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Rising(x) -> Scopal(x))\nforall x (Lethargic(x) -> Glaswegian(x))\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> not Lethargic(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> Lethargic(x))\nforall x (Downstream(x) and not Lethargic(x) -> Stung(x))\n\nnot Stung(vassili)\n\nforall x (Downstream(x) and not Lethargic(x) -> Stung(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Shalom is violet. Shalom is anorthitic. Bernie is undetected. If something is gumptious and not anorthitic then it is undetected. If something is undetected then it is homey. If something is grenadian then it is gumptious. All anorthitic things are not grenadian. All homey things are grenadian. If something is anorthitic and not grenadian then it is violet. Shalom is gumptious.", "logic": "\nViolet(shalom)\nAnorthitic(shalom)\nUndetected(bernie)\nforall x (Gumptious(x) and not Anorthitic(x) -> Undetected(x))\nforall x (Undetected(x) -> Homey(x))\nforall x (Grenadian(x) -> Gumptious(x))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) -> not Grenadian(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) -> Grenadian(x))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) and not Grenadian(x) -> Violet(x))\n\nGumptious(shalom)\n\nforall x (Grenadian(x) -> Gumptious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Bette is captivated. Bette is joined. Federica is unnerved. If something is overhead and not joined then it is unnerved. If something is unnerved then it is plumbous. If something is nazarene then it is overhead. All joined things are not nazarene. All plumbous things are nazarene. If something is joined and not nazarene then it is captivated. Bette is not green.", "logic": "\nCaptivated(bette)\nJoined(bette)\nUnnerved(federica)\nforall x (Overhead(x) and not Joined(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Unnerved(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Nazarene(x) -> Overhead(x))\nforall x (Joined(x) -> not Nazarene(x))\nforall x (Plumbous(x) -> Nazarene(x))\nforall x (Joined(x) and not Nazarene(x) -> Captivated(x))\n\nnot Green(bette)\n\nnot Green(bette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Godwin is stormproof. Godwin is canty. Ella is multicolor. If something is rising and not canty then it is multicolor. If something is multicolor then it is localised. If something is chanceful then it is rising. All canty things are not chanceful. All localised things are chanceful. If something is canty and not chanceful then it is stormproof. Ella is green.", "logic": "\nStormproof(godwin)\nCanty(godwin)\nMulticolor(ella)\nforall x (Rising(x) and not Canty(x) -> Multicolor(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> Localised(x))\nforall x (Chanceful(x) -> Rising(x))\nforall x (Canty(x) -> not Chanceful(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) -> Chanceful(x))\nforall x (Canty(x) and not Chanceful(x) -> Stormproof(x))\n\nGreen(ella)\n\nGreen(ella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1171"} {"premises": "Avery is desiccated. Avery is cachectic. Avery is unbooked. Avery is corroded. Avery is etiologic. Justina is desiccated. Justina is not corroded. Ulises is desiccated. Ulises is corroded. Ulises is not alimental. All etiologic people are cachectic. Round, desiccated people are cachectic. Young people are cachectic. If someone is cachectic and not impugnable then they are not corroded. If someone is impugnable and not desiccated then they are etiologic. If Avery is impugnable then Avery is not etiologic. If someone is cachectic then they are alimental. If Justina is impugnable and Justina is cachectic then Justina is corroded. Justina is not corroded.", "logic": "\nDesiccated(avery)\nCachectic(avery)\nUnbooked(avery)\nCorroded(avery)\nEtiologic(avery)\nDesiccated(justina)\nnot Corroded(justina)\nDesiccated(ulises)\nCorroded(ulises)\nnot Alimental(ulises)\nforall x (Etiologic(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) and Desiccated(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nforall x (Alimental(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nforall x (Cachectic(x) and not Impugnable(x) -> not Corroded(x))\nforall x (Impugnable(x) and not Desiccated(x) -> Etiologic(x))\nImpugnable(avery) -> not Etiologic(avery)\nforall x (Cachectic(x) -> Alimental(x))\nImpugnable(justina) and Cachectic(justina) -> Corroded(justina)\n\nnot Corroded(justina)\n\ntherefore not Corroded(justina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Glyn is summery. Glyn is polyploid. Glyn is surviving. Glyn is abducent. Glyn is aversive. Ralina is summery. Ralina is not abducent. Lorene is summery. Lorene is abducent. Lorene is not coenobitic. All aversive people are polyploid. Round, summery people are polyploid. Young people are polyploid. If someone is polyploid and not able then they are not abducent. If someone is able and not summery then they are aversive. If Glyn is able then Glyn is not aversive. If someone is polyploid then they are coenobitic. If Ralina is able and Ralina is polyploid then Ralina is abducent. Glyn is not abducent.", "logic": "\nSummery(glyn)\nPolyploid(glyn)\nSurviving(glyn)\nAbducent(glyn)\nAversive(glyn)\nSummery(ralina)\nnot Abducent(ralina)\nSummery(lorene)\nAbducent(lorene)\nnot Coenobitic(lorene)\nforall x (Aversive(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Surviving(x) and Summery(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Polyploid(x) and not Able(x) -> not Abducent(x))\nforall x (Able(x) and not Summery(x) -> Aversive(x))\nAble(glyn) -> not Aversive(glyn)\nforall x (Polyploid(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nAble(ralina) and Polyploid(ralina) -> Abducent(ralina)\n\nnot Abducent(glyn)\n\ntherefore Abducent(glyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Wally is frowzy. Wally is balconied. Wally is hindustani. Wally is adorned. Wally is motionless. Emiline is frowzy. Emiline is not adorned. Indira is frowzy. Indira is adorned. Indira is not lank. All motionless people are balconied. Round, frowzy people are balconied. Young people are balconied. If someone is balconied and not negative then they are not adorned. If someone is negative and not frowzy then they are motionless. If Wally is negative then Wally is not motionless. If someone is balconied then they are lank. If Emiline is negative and Emiline is balconied then Emiline is adorned. Wally is lank.", "logic": "\nFrowzy(wally)\nBalconied(wally)\nHindustani(wally)\nAdorned(wally)\nMotionless(wally)\nFrowzy(emiline)\nnot Adorned(emiline)\nFrowzy(indira)\nAdorned(indira)\nnot Lank(indira)\nforall x (Motionless(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Frowzy(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Balconied(x) and not Negative(x) -> not Adorned(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) and not Frowzy(x) -> Motionless(x))\nNegative(wally) -> not Motionless(wally)\nforall x (Balconied(x) -> Lank(x))\nNegative(emiline) and Balconied(emiline) -> Adorned(emiline)\n\nLank(wally)\n\nBalconied(wally) and forall x (Balconied(x) -> Lank(x)) -> therefore Lank(wally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Beck is unsuited. Beck is english. Beck is uppity. Beck is hmong. Beck is equipped. Noni is unsuited. Noni is not hmong. Lazlo is unsuited. Lazlo is hmong. Lazlo is not hairy. All equipped people are english. Round, unsuited people are english. Young people are english. If someone is english and not wondrous then they are not hmong. If someone is wondrous and not unsuited then they are equipped. If Beck is wondrous then Beck is not equipped. If someone is english then they are hairy. If Noni is wondrous and Noni is english then Noni is hmong. Beck is not hairy.", "logic": "\nUnsuited(beck)\nEnglish(beck)\nUppity(beck)\nHmong(beck)\nEquipped(beck)\nUnsuited(noni)\nnot Hmong(noni)\nUnsuited(lazlo)\nHmong(lazlo)\nnot Hairy(lazlo)\nforall x (Equipped(x) -> English(x))\nforall x (Uppity(x) and Unsuited(x) -> English(x))\nforall x (Hairy(x) -> English(x))\nforall x (English(x) and not Wondrous(x) -> not Hmong(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) and not Unsuited(x) -> Equipped(x))\nWondrous(beck) -> not Equipped(beck)\nforall x (English(x) -> Hairy(x))\nWondrous(noni) and English(noni) -> Hmong(noni)\n\nnot Hairy(beck)\n\nEnglish(beck) and forall x (English(x) -> Hairy(x)) -> therefore Hairy(beck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Osbourne is bahai. Osbourne is upward. Osbourne is yellowish. Osbourne is entozoan. Osbourne is nosy. Stepha is bahai. Stepha is not entozoan. Orville is bahai. Orville is entozoan. Orville is not doped. All nosy people are upward. Round, bahai people are upward. Young people are upward. If someone is upward and not impulsive then they are not entozoan. If someone is impulsive and not bahai then they are nosy. If Osbourne is impulsive then Osbourne is not nosy. If someone is upward then they are doped. If Stepha is impulsive and Stepha is upward then Stepha is entozoan. Stepha is not nosy.", "logic": "\nBahai(osbourne)\nUpward(osbourne)\nYellowish(osbourne)\nEntozoan(osbourne)\nNosy(osbourne)\nBahai(stepha)\nnot Entozoan(stepha)\nBahai(orville)\nEntozoan(orville)\nnot Doped(orville)\nforall x (Nosy(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Yellowish(x) and Bahai(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Upward(x) and not Impulsive(x) -> not Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Impulsive(x) and not Bahai(x) -> Nosy(x))\nImpulsive(osbourne) -> not Nosy(osbourne)\nforall x (Upward(x) -> Doped(x))\nImpulsive(stepha) and Upward(stepha) -> Entozoan(stepha)\n\nnot Nosy(stepha)\n\nforall x (Impulsive(x) and not Bahai(x) -> Nosy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Lyndsie is fateful. Lyndsie is icky. Lyndsie is beneficent. Lyndsie is windward. Lyndsie is avaricious. Helaine is fateful. Helaine is not windward. Francois is fateful. Francois is windward. Francois is not rupicolous. All avaricious people are icky. Round, fateful people are icky. Young people are icky. If someone is icky and not robustious then they are not windward. If someone is robustious and not fateful then they are avaricious. If Lyndsie is robustious then Lyndsie is not avaricious. If someone is icky then they are rupicolous. If Helaine is robustious and Helaine is icky then Helaine is windward. Francois is icky.", "logic": "\nFateful(lyndsie)\nIcky(lyndsie)\nBeneficent(lyndsie)\nWindward(lyndsie)\nAvaricious(lyndsie)\nFateful(helaine)\nnot Windward(helaine)\nFateful(francois)\nWindward(francois)\nnot Rupicolous(francois)\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Beneficent(x) and Fateful(x) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Icky(x) and not Robustious(x) -> not Windward(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and not Fateful(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nRobustious(lyndsie) -> not Avaricious(lyndsie)\nforall x (Icky(x) -> Rupicolous(x))\nRobustious(helaine) and Icky(helaine) -> Windward(helaine)\n\nIcky(francois)\n\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Icky(x)) <- forall x (Robustious(x) and not Fateful(x) -> Avaricious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Ingaberg is pudgy. Ingaberg is intrinsic. Ingaberg is desiccated. Ingaberg is belted. Ingaberg is brimming. Fredi is pudgy. Fredi is not belted. Rebecka is pudgy. Rebecka is belted. Rebecka is not immemorial. All brimming people are intrinsic. Round, pudgy people are intrinsic. Young people are intrinsic. If someone is intrinsic and not inhumane then they are not belted. If someone is inhumane and not pudgy then they are brimming. If Ingaberg is inhumane then Ingaberg is not brimming. If someone is intrinsic then they are immemorial. If Fredi is inhumane and Fredi is intrinsic then Fredi is belted. Ingaberg is not inhumane.", "logic": "\nPudgy(ingaberg)\nIntrinsic(ingaberg)\nDesiccated(ingaberg)\nBelted(ingaberg)\nBrimming(ingaberg)\nPudgy(fredi)\nnot Belted(fredi)\nPudgy(rebecka)\nBelted(rebecka)\nnot Immemorial(rebecka)\nforall x (Brimming(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and Pudgy(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Immemorial(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) and not Inhumane(x) -> not Belted(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and not Pudgy(x) -> Brimming(x))\nInhumane(ingaberg) -> not Brimming(ingaberg)\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Immemorial(x))\nInhumane(fredi) and Intrinsic(fredi) -> Belted(fredi)\n\nnot Inhumane(ingaberg)\n\nnot Inhumane(ingaberg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Hasheem is jamaican. Hasheem is defeated. Hasheem is yucky. Hasheem is doctrinal. Hasheem is slumbery. Augustina is jamaican. Augustina is not doctrinal. Eduardo is jamaican. Eduardo is doctrinal. Eduardo is not untimbered. All slumbery people are defeated. Round, jamaican people are defeated. Young people are defeated. If someone is defeated and not booming then they are not doctrinal. If someone is booming and not jamaican then they are slumbery. If Hasheem is booming then Hasheem is not slumbery. If someone is defeated then they are untimbered. If Augustina is booming and Augustina is defeated then Augustina is doctrinal. Eduardo is yucky.", "logic": "\nJamaican(hasheem)\nDefeated(hasheem)\nYucky(hasheem)\nDoctrinal(hasheem)\nSlumbery(hasheem)\nJamaican(augustina)\nnot Doctrinal(augustina)\nJamaican(eduardo)\nDoctrinal(eduardo)\nnot Untimbered(eduardo)\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Yucky(x) and Jamaican(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Untimbered(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Defeated(x) and not Booming(x) -> not Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Booming(x) and not Jamaican(x) -> Slumbery(x))\nBooming(hasheem) -> not Slumbery(hasheem)\nforall x (Defeated(x) -> Untimbered(x))\nBooming(augustina) and Defeated(augustina) -> Doctrinal(augustina)\n\nYucky(eduardo)\n\nYucky(eduardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3182"} {"premises": "Aamir is frothy. Aamir is alien. Aamir is unrevised. Aamir is unwearable. Aamir is acidulous. Bobette is not fitful. Bobette is frothy. Bobette is boney. Bobette is not alien. Bobette is unrevised. Bobette is not acidulous. Rosy is fitful. Rosy is frothy. Rosy is not alien. Rosy is not unwearable. Rosy is acidulous. If someone is alien then they are not fitful. Red people are not fitful. If Bobette is alien then Bobette is fitful. Rough, fitful people are alien. Nice people are unwearable. If Bobette is fitful then Bobette is boney. All unrevised, unwearable people are boney. If Rosy is boney and Rosy is fitful then Rosy is not acidulous. Aamir is unwearable.", "logic": "\nFrothy(aamir)\nAlien(aamir)\nUnrevised(aamir)\nUnwearable(aamir)\nAcidulous(aamir)\nnot Fitful(bobette)\nFrothy(bobette)\nBoney(bobette)\nnot Alien(bobette)\nUnrevised(bobette)\nnot Acidulous(bobette)\nFitful(rosy)\nFrothy(rosy)\nnot Alien(rosy)\nnot Unwearable(rosy)\nAcidulous(rosy)\nforall x (Alien(x) -> not Fitful(x))\nforall x (Alien(x) -> not Fitful(x))\nAlien(bobette) -> Fitful(bobette)\nforall x (Unrevised(x) and Fitful(x) -> Alien(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> Unwearable(x))\nFitful(bobette) -> Boney(bobette)\nforall x (Unrevised(x) and Unwearable(x) -> Boney(x))\nBoney(rosy) and Fitful(rosy) -> not Acidulous(rosy)\n\nUnwearable(aamir)\n\ntherefore Unwearable(aamir)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5621"} {"premises": "Netti is auriculate. Netti is unitarian. Netti is missed. Netti is blurry. Netti is bubbling. Kyle is not pithy. Kyle is auriculate. Kyle is caducous. Kyle is not unitarian. Kyle is missed. Kyle is not bubbling. Kirbee is pithy. Kirbee is auriculate. Kirbee is not unitarian. Kirbee is not blurry. Kirbee is bubbling. If someone is unitarian then they are not pithy. Red people are not pithy. If Kyle is unitarian then Kyle is pithy. Rough, pithy people are unitarian. Nice people are blurry. If Kyle is pithy then Kyle is caducous. All missed, blurry people are caducous. If Kirbee is caducous and Kirbee is pithy then Kirbee is not bubbling. Netti is not missed.", "logic": "\nAuriculate(netti)\nUnitarian(netti)\nMissed(netti)\nBlurry(netti)\nBubbling(netti)\nnot Pithy(kyle)\nAuriculate(kyle)\nCaducous(kyle)\nnot Unitarian(kyle)\nMissed(kyle)\nnot Bubbling(kyle)\nPithy(kirbee)\nAuriculate(kirbee)\nnot Unitarian(kirbee)\nnot Blurry(kirbee)\nBubbling(kirbee)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> not Pithy(x))\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> not Pithy(x))\nUnitarian(kyle) -> Pithy(kyle)\nforall x (Missed(x) and Pithy(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Caducous(x) -> Blurry(x))\nPithy(kyle) -> Caducous(kyle)\nforall x (Missed(x) and Blurry(x) -> Caducous(x))\nCaducous(kirbee) and Pithy(kirbee) -> not Bubbling(kirbee)\n\nnot Missed(netti)\n\ntherefore Missed(netti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5621"} {"premises": "Fara is oppressive. Fara is eight. Fara is unpaved. Fara is rustproof. Fara is weensy. Thaddus is not cognisable. Thaddus is oppressive. Thaddus is grouped. Thaddus is not eight. Thaddus is unpaved. Thaddus is not weensy. Jenda is cognisable. Jenda is oppressive. Jenda is not eight. Jenda is not rustproof. Jenda is weensy. If someone is eight then they are not cognisable. Red people are not cognisable. If Thaddus is eight then Thaddus is cognisable. Rough, cognisable people are eight. Nice people are rustproof. If Thaddus is cognisable then Thaddus is grouped. All unpaved, rustproof people are grouped. If Jenda is grouped and Jenda is cognisable then Jenda is not weensy. Jenda is not grouped.", "logic": "\nOppressive(fara)\nEight(fara)\nUnpaved(fara)\nRustproof(fara)\nWeensy(fara)\nnot Cognisable(thaddus)\nOppressive(thaddus)\nGrouped(thaddus)\nnot Eight(thaddus)\nUnpaved(thaddus)\nnot Weensy(thaddus)\nCognisable(jenda)\nOppressive(jenda)\nnot Eight(jenda)\nnot Rustproof(jenda)\nWeensy(jenda)\nforall x (Eight(x) -> not Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Eight(x) -> not Cognisable(x))\nEight(thaddus) -> Cognisable(thaddus)\nforall x (Unpaved(x) and Cognisable(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Grouped(x) -> Rustproof(x))\nCognisable(thaddus) -> Grouped(thaddus)\nforall x (Unpaved(x) and Rustproof(x) -> Grouped(x))\nGrouped(jenda) and Cognisable(jenda) -> not Weensy(jenda)\n\nnot Grouped(jenda)\n\nforall x (Unpaved(x) and Rustproof(x) -> Grouped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5621"} {"premises": "Stanislaw is cruciate. Stanislaw is kookie. Stanislaw is ungreased. Stanislaw is edentate. Stanislaw is alated. Elwin is not oleophobic. Elwin is cruciate. Elwin is biface. Elwin is not kookie. Elwin is ungreased. Elwin is not alated. Gloriana is oleophobic. Gloriana is cruciate. Gloriana is not kookie. Gloriana is not edentate. Gloriana is alated. If someone is kookie then they are not oleophobic. Red people are not oleophobic. If Elwin is kookie then Elwin is oleophobic. Rough, oleophobic people are kookie. Nice people are edentate. If Elwin is oleophobic then Elwin is biface. All ungreased, edentate people are biface. If Gloriana is biface and Gloriana is oleophobic then Gloriana is not alated. Gloriana is ungreased.", "logic": "\nCruciate(stanislaw)\nKookie(stanislaw)\nUngreased(stanislaw)\nEdentate(stanislaw)\nAlated(stanislaw)\nnot Oleophobic(elwin)\nCruciate(elwin)\nBiface(elwin)\nnot Kookie(elwin)\nUngreased(elwin)\nnot Alated(elwin)\nOleophobic(gloriana)\nCruciate(gloriana)\nnot Kookie(gloriana)\nnot Edentate(gloriana)\nAlated(gloriana)\nforall x (Kookie(x) -> not Oleophobic(x))\nforall x (Kookie(x) -> not Oleophobic(x))\nKookie(elwin) -> Oleophobic(elwin)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Oleophobic(x) -> Kookie(x))\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Edentate(x))\nOleophobic(elwin) -> Biface(elwin)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) and Edentate(x) -> Biface(x))\nBiface(gloriana) and Oleophobic(gloriana) -> not Alated(gloriana)\n\nUngreased(gloriana)\n\nUngreased(gloriana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5621"} {"premises": "Kelsy is unearthly. Christine is larghetto. Vonnie is unearthly. Smart people are unearthly. If Vonnie is enervated then Vonnie is bahamian. Furry people are repulsive. If someone is repulsive and larghetto then they are maledict. Blue, maledict people are bahamian. Furry people are enervated. Kelsy is unearthly.", "logic": "\nUnearthly(kelsy)\nLarghetto(christine)\nUnearthly(vonnie)\nforall x (Enervated(x) -> Unearthly(x))\nEnervated(vonnie) -> Bahamian(vonnie)\nforall x (Larghetto(x) -> Repulsive(x))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) and Larghetto(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) and Maledict(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Larghetto(x) -> Enervated(x))\n\nUnearthly(kelsy)\n\ntherefore Unearthly(kelsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Maurits is holey. Rheba is faceless. Allyce is holey. Smart people are holey. If Allyce is barehanded then Allyce is jocular. Furry people are helpless. If someone is helpless and faceless then they are roofed. Blue, roofed people are jocular. Furry people are barehanded. Allyce is not holey.", "logic": "\nHoley(maurits)\nFaceless(rheba)\nHoley(allyce)\nforall x (Barehanded(x) -> Holey(x))\nBarehanded(allyce) -> Jocular(allyce)\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Helpless(x))\nforall x (Helpless(x) and Faceless(x) -> Roofed(x))\nforall x (Holey(x) and Roofed(x) -> Jocular(x))\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Barehanded(x))\n\nnot Holey(allyce)\n\ntherefore Holey(allyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Iris is solo. Shira is cultivable. Trace is solo. Smart people are solo. If Trace is semestral then Trace is apocryphal. Furry people are viviparous. If someone is viviparous and cultivable then they are reflected. Blue, reflected people are apocryphal. Furry people are semestral. Shira is semestral.", "logic": "\nSolo(iris)\nCultivable(shira)\nSolo(trace)\nforall x (Semestral(x) -> Solo(x))\nSemestral(trace) -> Apocryphal(trace)\nforall x (Cultivable(x) -> Viviparous(x))\nforall x (Viviparous(x) and Cultivable(x) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Solo(x) and Reflected(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\nforall x (Cultivable(x) -> Semestral(x))\n\nSemestral(shira)\n\nCultivable(shira) and forall x (Cultivable(x) -> Semestral(x)) -> therefore Semestral(shira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Catharina is adulterate. Myrtie is anachronic. Shanie is adulterate. Smart people are adulterate. If Shanie is shady then Shanie is flavorsome. Furry people are improper. If someone is improper and anachronic then they are slumbery. Blue, slumbery people are flavorsome. Furry people are shady. Myrtie is not shady.", "logic": "\nAdulterate(catharina)\nAnachronic(myrtie)\nAdulterate(shanie)\nforall x (Shady(x) -> Adulterate(x))\nShady(shanie) -> Flavorsome(shanie)\nforall x (Anachronic(x) -> Improper(x))\nforall x (Improper(x) and Anachronic(x) -> Slumbery(x))\nforall x (Adulterate(x) and Slumbery(x) -> Flavorsome(x))\nforall x (Anachronic(x) -> Shady(x))\n\nnot Shady(myrtie)\n\nAnachronic(myrtie) and forall x (Anachronic(x) -> Shady(x)) -> therefore Shady(myrtie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Aldis is catabatic. Celine is uncaring. Gena is catabatic. Smart people are catabatic. If Gena is nonracial then Gena is admonitory. Furry people are rotatable. If someone is rotatable and uncaring then they are nigerien. Blue, nigerien people are admonitory. Furry people are nonracial. Celine is catabatic.", "logic": "\nCatabatic(aldis)\nUncaring(celine)\nCatabatic(gena)\nforall x (Nonracial(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nNonracial(gena) -> Admonitory(gena)\nforall x (Uncaring(x) -> Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and Uncaring(x) -> Nigerien(x))\nforall x (Catabatic(x) and Nigerien(x) -> Admonitory(x))\nforall x (Uncaring(x) -> Nonracial(x))\n\nCatabatic(celine)\n\nUncaring(celine) and forall x (Uncaring(x) -> Nonracial(x)) -> therefore Nonracial(celine) Nonracial(celine) and forall x (Nonracial(x) -> Catabatic(x)) -> therefore Catabatic(celine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Charmine is theocratic. Marigold is papistic. Rochelle is theocratic. Smart people are theocratic. If Rochelle is profitable then Rochelle is knobbly. Furry people are steely. If someone is steely and papistic then they are deductible. Blue, deductible people are knobbly. Furry people are profitable. Marigold is not deductible.", "logic": "\nTheocratic(charmine)\nPapistic(marigold)\nTheocratic(rochelle)\nforall x (Profitable(x) -> Theocratic(x))\nProfitable(rochelle) -> Knobbly(rochelle)\nforall x (Papistic(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Steely(x) and Papistic(x) -> Deductible(x))\nforall x (Theocratic(x) and Deductible(x) -> Knobbly(x))\nforall x (Papistic(x) -> Profitable(x))\n\nnot Deductible(marigold)\n\nPapistic(marigold) and forall x (Papistic(x) -> Steely(x)) -> therefore Steely(marigold) Steely(marigold) and Papistic(marigold) and forall x (Steely(x) and Papistic(x) -> Deductible(x)) -> therefore Deductible(marigold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Libbie is sedgelike. Alf is cubistic. Doloritas is sedgelike. Smart people are sedgelike. If Doloritas is unmelodic then Doloritas is foreign. Furry people are anticlinal. If someone is anticlinal and cubistic then they are flaccid. Blue, flaccid people are foreign. Furry people are unmelodic. Alf is foreign.", "logic": "\nSedgelike(libbie)\nCubistic(alf)\nSedgelike(doloritas)\nforall x (Unmelodic(x) -> Sedgelike(x))\nUnmelodic(doloritas) -> Foreign(doloritas)\nforall x (Cubistic(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nforall x (Anticlinal(x) and Cubistic(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Sedgelike(x) and Flaccid(x) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Cubistic(x) -> Unmelodic(x))\n\nForeign(alf)\n\nCubistic(alf) and forall x (Cubistic(x) -> Unmelodic(x)) -> therefore Unmelodic(alf) Unmelodic(alf) and forall x (Unmelodic(x) -> Sedgelike(x)) -> therefore Sedgelike(alf) Cubistic(alf) and forall x (Cubistic(x) -> Anticlinal(x)) -> therefore Anticlinal(alf) Anticlinal(alf) and Cubistic(alf) and forall x (Anticlinal(x) and Cubistic(x) -> Flaccid(x)) -> therefore Flaccid(alf) Sedgelike(alf) and Flaccid(alf) and forall x (Sedgelike(x) and Flaccid(x) -> Foreign(x)) -> therefore Foreign(alf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Fawnia is miniscule. Selinda is seeded. Kirbie is miniscule. Smart people are miniscule. If Kirbie is adored then Kirbie is practiced. Furry people are deficient. If someone is deficient and seeded then they are midget. Blue, midget people are practiced. Furry people are adored. Selinda is not practiced.", "logic": "\nMiniscule(fawnia)\nSeeded(selinda)\nMiniscule(kirbie)\nforall x (Adored(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nAdored(kirbie) -> Practiced(kirbie)\nforall x (Seeded(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Deficient(x) and Seeded(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Miniscule(x) and Midget(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Seeded(x) -> Adored(x))\n\nnot Practiced(selinda)\n\nSeeded(selinda) and forall x (Seeded(x) -> Adored(x)) -> therefore Adored(selinda) Adored(selinda) and forall x (Adored(x) -> Miniscule(x)) -> therefore Miniscule(selinda) Seeded(selinda) and forall x (Seeded(x) -> Deficient(x)) -> therefore Deficient(selinda) Deficient(selinda) and Seeded(selinda) and forall x (Deficient(x) and Seeded(x) -> Midget(x)) -> therefore Midget(selinda) Miniscule(selinda) and Midget(selinda) and forall x (Miniscule(x) and Midget(x) -> Practiced(x)) -> therefore Practiced(selinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Merry is dependable. Steward is flip. Marijo is dependable. Smart people are dependable. If Marijo is albescent then Marijo is tender. Furry people are frilled. If someone is frilled and flip then they are rosaceous. Blue, rosaceous people are tender. Furry people are albescent. Marijo is not frilled.", "logic": "\nDependable(merry)\nFlip(steward)\nDependable(marijo)\nforall x (Albescent(x) -> Dependable(x))\nAlbescent(marijo) -> Tender(marijo)\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Frilled(x))\nforall x (Frilled(x) and Flip(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Dependable(x) and Rosaceous(x) -> Tender(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Albescent(x))\n\nnot Frilled(marijo)\n\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Frilled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Cassandre is unfair. Amabel is matured. Avram is unfair. Smart people are unfair. If Avram is risque then Avram is bated. Furry people are turgid. If someone is turgid and matured then they are wintry. Blue, wintry people are bated. Furry people are risque. Avram is wintry.", "logic": "\nUnfair(cassandre)\nMatured(amabel)\nUnfair(avram)\nforall x (Risque(x) -> Unfair(x))\nRisque(avram) -> Bated(avram)\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Turgid(x))\nforall x (Turgid(x) and Matured(x) -> Wintry(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Wintry(x) -> Bated(x))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Risque(x))\n\nWintry(avram)\n\nforall x (Turgid(x) and Matured(x) -> Wintry(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Jeanne is parenteral. Winny is voluntary. Susana is parenteral. Smart people are parenteral. If Susana is gibbose then Susana is unkind. Furry people are thousandth. If someone is thousandth and voluntary then they are burled. Blue, burled people are unkind. Furry people are gibbose. Susana is not unkind.", "logic": "\nParenteral(jeanne)\nVoluntary(winny)\nParenteral(susana)\nforall x (Gibbose(x) -> Parenteral(x))\nGibbose(susana) -> Unkind(susana)\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Voluntary(x) -> Burled(x))\nforall x (Parenteral(x) and Burled(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Gibbose(x))\n\nnot Unkind(susana)\n\nGibbose(susana) -> Unkind(susana) <- forall x (Voluntary(x) -> Gibbose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Germana is branchial. Mallorie is areolate. Thorstein is branchial. Smart people are branchial. If Thorstein is precocious then Thorstein is southerly. Furry people are printable. If someone is printable and areolate then they are chaetal. Blue, chaetal people are southerly. Furry people are precocious. Germana is chaetal.", "logic": "\nBranchial(germana)\nAreolate(mallorie)\nBranchial(thorstein)\nforall x (Precocious(x) -> Branchial(x))\nPrecocious(thorstein) -> Southerly(thorstein)\nforall x (Areolate(x) -> Printable(x))\nforall x (Printable(x) and Areolate(x) -> Chaetal(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) and Chaetal(x) -> Southerly(x))\nforall x (Areolate(x) -> Precocious(x))\n\nChaetal(germana)\n\nforall x (Printable(x) and Areolate(x) -> Chaetal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Kimmi is estrous. Carrissa is acidulent. Julee is estrous. Smart people are estrous. If Julee is ineligible then Julee is dextrous. Furry people are flowing. If someone is flowing and acidulent then they are travelable. Blue, travelable people are dextrous. Furry people are ineligible. Julee is not acidulent.", "logic": "\nEstrous(kimmi)\nAcidulent(carrissa)\nEstrous(julee)\nforall x (Ineligible(x) -> Estrous(x))\nIneligible(julee) -> Dextrous(julee)\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) and Acidulent(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Estrous(x) and Travelable(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Ineligible(x))\n\nnot Acidulent(julee)\n\nnot Acidulent(julee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Darwin is augustan. Georgia is unchaste. Thaxter is augustan. Smart people are augustan. If Thaxter is weaponed then Thaxter is lengthened. Furry people are tripinnate. If someone is tripinnate and unchaste then they are weeny. Blue, weeny people are lengthened. Furry people are weaponed. Georgia is nice.", "logic": "\nAugustan(darwin)\nUnchaste(georgia)\nAugustan(thaxter)\nforall x (Weaponed(x) -> Augustan(x))\nWeaponed(thaxter) -> Lengthened(thaxter)\nforall x (Unchaste(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) and Unchaste(x) -> Weeny(x))\nforall x (Augustan(x) and Weeny(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) -> Weaponed(x))\n\nNice(georgia)\n\nNice(georgia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Valene is assertable. Moore is unguided. Winnie is assertable. Smart people are assertable. If Winnie is zapotec then Winnie is beta. Furry people are quiescent. If someone is quiescent and unguided then they are anal. Blue, anal people are beta. Furry people are zapotec. Valene is not nice.", "logic": "\nAssertable(valene)\nUnguided(moore)\nAssertable(winnie)\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Assertable(x))\nZapotec(winnie) -> Beta(winnie)\nforall x (Unguided(x) -> Quiescent(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) and Unguided(x) -> Anal(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) and Anal(x) -> Beta(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) -> Zapotec(x))\n\nnot Nice(valene)\n\nnot Nice(valene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "Urbain is fleeting. Esta is whacking. Jon is fleeting. Smart people are fleeting. If Jon is monocarpic then Jon is resounding. Furry people are erectile. If someone is erectile and whacking then they are airborne. Blue, airborne people are resounding. Furry people are monocarpic. Urbain is whacking.", "logic": "\nFleeting(urbain)\nWhacking(esta)\nFleeting(jon)\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) -> Fleeting(x))\nMonocarpic(jon) -> Resounding(jon)\nforall x (Whacking(x) -> Erectile(x))\nforall x (Erectile(x) and Whacking(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Fleeting(x) and Airborne(x) -> Resounding(x))\nforall x (Whacking(x) -> Monocarpic(x))\n\nWhacking(urbain)\n\nWhacking(urbain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-758"} {"premises": "The eulalie harangue the mair. The eulalie reappraise the mair. The mair is diestrual. The israel harangue the eulalie. The israel shadowbox the eulalie. The israel shadowbox the mair. The camile harangue the eulalie. If the israel shadowbox the camile then the camile reappraise the eulalie. If someone reappraise the mair and they need the mair then the mair shadowbox the israel. If someone is grandiose and they see the camile then the camile is grandiose. If someone shadowbox the israel and the israel harangue the eulalie then they are leafy. If someone reappraise the eulalie then they are diestrual. If someone harangue the mair then they need the mair. If someone is grandiose then they need the camile. If someone is orthogonal and they chase the camile then they are grandiose. The eulalie harangue the mair.", "logic": "\nHarangue(eulalie, mair)\nReappraise(eulalie, mair)\nDiestrual(mair)\nHarangue(israel, eulalie)\nShadowbox(israel, eulalie)\nShadowbox(israel, mair)\nHarangue(camile, eulalie)\nShadowbox(israel, camile) -> Reappraise(camile, eulalie)\nforall x (Reappraise(x, mair) and Shadowbox(x, mair) -> Shadowbox(mair, israel))\nforall x (Grandiose(x) and Reappraise(x, camile) -> Grandiose(camile))\nforall x (Shadowbox(x, israel) and Harangue(israel, eulalie) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, eulalie) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Harangue(x, mair) -> Shadowbox(x, mair))\nforall x (Grandiose(x) -> Shadowbox(x, camile))\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) and Harangue(x, camile) -> Grandiose(x))\n\nHarangue(eulalie, mair)\n\ntherefore Harangue(eulalie, mair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The pansy quiver the gray. The pansy tomahawk the gray. The gray is flash. The hanson quiver the pansy. The hanson tenderise the pansy. The hanson tenderise the gray. The moishe quiver the pansy. If the hanson tenderise the moishe then the moishe tomahawk the pansy. If someone tomahawk the gray and they need the gray then the gray tenderise the hanson. If someone is askance and they see the moishe then the moishe is askance. If someone tenderise the hanson and the hanson quiver the pansy then they are unrevised. If someone tomahawk the pansy then they are flash. If someone quiver the gray then they need the gray. If someone is askance then they need the moishe. If someone is gingery and they chase the moishe then they are askance. The pansy does not see the gray.", "logic": "\nQuiver(pansy, gray)\nTomahawk(pansy, gray)\nFlash(gray)\nQuiver(hanson, pansy)\nTenderise(hanson, pansy)\nTenderise(hanson, gray)\nQuiver(moishe, pansy)\nTenderise(hanson, moishe) -> Tomahawk(moishe, pansy)\nforall x (Tomahawk(x, gray) and Tenderise(x, gray) -> Tenderise(gray, hanson))\nforall x (Askance(x) and Tomahawk(x, moishe) -> Askance(moishe))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, hanson) and Quiver(hanson, pansy) -> Unrevised(x))\nforall x (Tomahawk(x, pansy) -> Flash(x))\nforall x (Quiver(x, gray) -> Tenderise(x, gray))\nforall x (Askance(x) -> Tenderise(x, moishe))\nforall x (Gingery(x) and Quiver(x, moishe) -> Askance(x))\n\nnot Tomahawk(pansy, gray)\n\ntherefore Tomahawk(pansy, gray)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The maia miscount the fonsie. The maia elaborate the fonsie. The fonsie is posed. The sheba miscount the maia. The sheba outrange the maia. The sheba outrange the fonsie. The zeke miscount the maia. If the sheba outrange the zeke then the zeke elaborate the maia. If someone elaborate the fonsie and they need the fonsie then the fonsie outrange the sheba. If someone is fibreoptic and they see the zeke then the zeke is fibreoptic. If someone outrange the sheba and the sheba miscount the maia then they are siberian. If someone elaborate the maia then they are posed. If someone miscount the fonsie then they need the fonsie. If someone is fibreoptic then they need the zeke. If someone is querulous and they chase the zeke then they are fibreoptic. The maia outrange the fonsie.", "logic": "\nMiscount(maia, fonsie)\nElaborate(maia, fonsie)\nPosed(fonsie)\nMiscount(sheba, maia)\nOutrange(sheba, maia)\nOutrange(sheba, fonsie)\nMiscount(zeke, maia)\nOutrange(sheba, zeke) -> Elaborate(zeke, maia)\nforall x (Elaborate(x, fonsie) and Outrange(x, fonsie) -> Outrange(fonsie, sheba))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) and Elaborate(x, zeke) -> Fibreoptic(zeke))\nforall x (Outrange(x, sheba) and Miscount(sheba, maia) -> Siberian(x))\nforall x (Elaborate(x, maia) -> Posed(x))\nforall x (Miscount(x, fonsie) -> Outrange(x, fonsie))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> Outrange(x, zeke))\nforall x (Querulous(x) and Miscount(x, zeke) -> Fibreoptic(x))\n\nOutrange(maia, fonsie)\n\nMiscount(maia, fonsie) and forall x (Miscount(x, fonsie) -> Outrange(x, fonsie)) -> therefore Outrange(maia, fonsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The frederica trade the jeremy. The frederica snaffle the jeremy. The jeremy is ampullar. The michel trade the frederica. The michel mortify the frederica. The michel mortify the jeremy. The tonya trade the frederica. If the michel mortify the tonya then the tonya snaffle the frederica. If someone snaffle the jeremy and they need the jeremy then the jeremy mortify the michel. If someone is dissenting and they see the tonya then the tonya is dissenting. If someone mortify the michel and the michel trade the frederica then they are tempting. If someone snaffle the frederica then they are ampullar. If someone trade the jeremy then they need the jeremy. If someone is dissenting then they need the tonya. If someone is condolent and they chase the tonya then they are dissenting. The frederica does not need the jeremy.", "logic": "\nTrade(frederica, jeremy)\nSnaffle(frederica, jeremy)\nAmpullar(jeremy)\nTrade(michel, frederica)\nMortify(michel, frederica)\nMortify(michel, jeremy)\nTrade(tonya, frederica)\nMortify(michel, tonya) -> Snaffle(tonya, frederica)\nforall x (Snaffle(x, jeremy) and Mortify(x, jeremy) -> Mortify(jeremy, michel))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) and Snaffle(x, tonya) -> Dissenting(tonya))\nforall x (Mortify(x, michel) and Trade(michel, frederica) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Snaffle(x, frederica) -> Ampullar(x))\nforall x (Trade(x, jeremy) -> Mortify(x, jeremy))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> Mortify(x, tonya))\nforall x (Condolent(x) and Trade(x, tonya) -> Dissenting(x))\n\nnot Mortify(frederica, jeremy)\n\nTrade(frederica, jeremy) and forall x (Trade(x, jeremy) -> Mortify(x, jeremy)) -> therefore Mortify(frederica, jeremy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The edwin pair the gretta. The edwin cord the gretta. The gretta is cotyloidal. The damon pair the edwin. The damon blanch the edwin. The damon blanch the gretta. The blinni pair the edwin. If the damon blanch the blinni then the blinni cord the edwin. If someone cord the gretta and they need the gretta then the gretta blanch the damon. If someone is delimited and they see the blinni then the blinni is delimited. If someone blanch the damon and the damon pair the edwin then they are earthlike. If someone cord the edwin then they are cotyloidal. If someone pair the gretta then they need the gretta. If someone is delimited then they need the blinni. If someone is hurt and they chase the blinni then they are delimited. The gretta blanch the damon.", "logic": "\nPair(edwin, gretta)\nCord(edwin, gretta)\nCotyloidal(gretta)\nPair(damon, edwin)\nBlanch(damon, edwin)\nBlanch(damon, gretta)\nPair(blinni, edwin)\nBlanch(damon, blinni) -> Cord(blinni, edwin)\nforall x (Cord(x, gretta) and Blanch(x, gretta) -> Blanch(gretta, damon))\nforall x (Delimited(x) and Cord(x, blinni) -> Delimited(blinni))\nforall x (Blanch(x, damon) and Pair(damon, edwin) -> Earthlike(x))\nforall x (Cord(x, edwin) -> Cotyloidal(x))\nforall x (Pair(x, gretta) -> Blanch(x, gretta))\nforall x (Delimited(x) -> Blanch(x, blinni))\nforall x (Hurt(x) and Pair(x, blinni) -> Delimited(x))\n\nBlanch(gretta, damon)\n\nPair(edwin, gretta) and forall x (Pair(x, gretta) -> Blanch(x, gretta)) -> therefore Blanch(edwin, gretta) Cord(edwin, gretta) and Blanch(edwin, gretta) and forall x (Cord(x, gretta) and Blanch(x, gretta) -> Blanch(gretta, damon)) -> therefore Blanch(gretta, damon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The chery neuter the amata. The chery ostentate the amata. The amata is rounded. The raoul neuter the chery. The raoul pawn the chery. The raoul pawn the amata. The gae neuter the chery. If the raoul pawn the gae then the gae ostentate the chery. If someone ostentate the amata and they need the amata then the amata pawn the raoul. If someone is tremulous and they see the gae then the gae is tremulous. If someone pawn the raoul and the raoul neuter the chery then they are vaned. If someone ostentate the chery then they are rounded. If someone neuter the amata then they need the amata. If someone is tremulous then they need the gae. If someone is operant and they chase the gae then they are tremulous. The amata does not need the raoul.", "logic": "\nNeuter(chery, amata)\nOstentate(chery, amata)\nRounded(amata)\nNeuter(raoul, chery)\nPawn(raoul, chery)\nPawn(raoul, amata)\nNeuter(gae, chery)\nPawn(raoul, gae) -> Ostentate(gae, chery)\nforall x (Ostentate(x, amata) and Pawn(x, amata) -> Pawn(amata, raoul))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and Ostentate(x, gae) -> Tremulous(gae))\nforall x (Pawn(x, raoul) and Neuter(raoul, chery) -> Vaned(x))\nforall x (Ostentate(x, chery) -> Rounded(x))\nforall x (Neuter(x, amata) -> Pawn(x, amata))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) -> Pawn(x, gae))\nforall x (Operant(x) and Neuter(x, gae) -> Tremulous(x))\n\nnot Pawn(amata, raoul)\n\nNeuter(chery, amata) and forall x (Neuter(x, amata) -> Pawn(x, amata)) -> therefore Pawn(chery, amata) Ostentate(chery, amata) and Pawn(chery, amata) and forall x (Ostentate(x, amata) and Pawn(x, amata) -> Pawn(amata, raoul)) -> therefore Pawn(amata, raoul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The arabelle rave the xylina. The arabelle encipher the xylina. The xylina is irritable. The corliss rave the arabelle. The corliss embalm the arabelle. The corliss embalm the xylina. The shoshanna rave the arabelle. If the corliss embalm the shoshanna then the shoshanna encipher the arabelle. If someone encipher the xylina and they need the xylina then the xylina embalm the corliss. If someone is prototypic and they see the shoshanna then the shoshanna is prototypic. If someone embalm the corliss and the corliss rave the arabelle then they are histologic. If someone encipher the arabelle then they are irritable. If someone rave the xylina then they need the xylina. If someone is prototypic then they need the shoshanna. If someone is tyrannous and they chase the shoshanna then they are prototypic. The xylina is histologic.", "logic": "\nRave(arabelle, xylina)\nEncipher(arabelle, xylina)\nIrritable(xylina)\nRave(corliss, arabelle)\nEmbalm(corliss, arabelle)\nEmbalm(corliss, xylina)\nRave(shoshanna, arabelle)\nEmbalm(corliss, shoshanna) -> Encipher(shoshanna, arabelle)\nforall x (Encipher(x, xylina) and Embalm(x, xylina) -> Embalm(xylina, corliss))\nforall x (Prototypic(x) and Encipher(x, shoshanna) -> Prototypic(shoshanna))\nforall x (Embalm(x, corliss) and Rave(corliss, arabelle) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Encipher(x, arabelle) -> Irritable(x))\nforall x (Rave(x, xylina) -> Embalm(x, xylina))\nforall x (Prototypic(x) -> Embalm(x, shoshanna))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) and Rave(x, shoshanna) -> Prototypic(x))\n\nHistologic(xylina)\n\nRave(arabelle, xylina) and forall x (Rave(x, xylina) -> Embalm(x, xylina)) -> therefore Embalm(arabelle, xylina) Encipher(arabelle, xylina) and Embalm(arabelle, xylina) and forall x (Encipher(x, xylina) and Embalm(x, xylina) -> Embalm(xylina, corliss)) -> therefore Embalm(xylina, corliss) Embalm(xylina, corliss) and Rave(corliss, arabelle) and forall x (Embalm(x, corliss) and Rave(corliss, arabelle) -> Histologic(x)) -> therefore Histologic(xylina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The ely apply the mable. The ely censure the mable. The mable is imitative. The pete apply the ely. The pete tramp the ely. The pete tramp the mable. The grove apply the ely. If the pete tramp the grove then the grove censure the ely. If someone censure the mable and they need the mable then the mable tramp the pete. If someone is singular and they see the grove then the grove is singular. If someone tramp the pete and the pete apply the ely then they are bridgeable. If someone censure the ely then they are imitative. If someone apply the mable then they need the mable. If someone is singular then they need the grove. If someone is raffish and they chase the grove then they are singular. The mable is not bridgeable.", "logic": "\nApply(ely, mable)\nCensure(ely, mable)\nImitative(mable)\nApply(pete, ely)\nTramp(pete, ely)\nTramp(pete, mable)\nApply(grove, ely)\nTramp(pete, grove) -> Censure(grove, ely)\nforall x (Censure(x, mable) and Tramp(x, mable) -> Tramp(mable, pete))\nforall x (Singular(x) and Censure(x, grove) -> Singular(grove))\nforall x (Tramp(x, pete) and Apply(pete, ely) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Censure(x, ely) -> Imitative(x))\nforall x (Apply(x, mable) -> Tramp(x, mable))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Tramp(x, grove))\nforall x (Raffish(x) and Apply(x, grove) -> Singular(x))\n\nnot Bridgeable(mable)\n\nApply(ely, mable) and forall x (Apply(x, mable) -> Tramp(x, mable)) -> therefore Tramp(ely, mable) Censure(ely, mable) and Tramp(ely, mable) and forall x (Censure(x, mable) and Tramp(x, mable) -> Tramp(mable, pete)) -> therefore Tramp(mable, pete) Tramp(mable, pete) and Apply(pete, ely) and forall x (Tramp(x, pete) and Apply(pete, ely) -> Bridgeable(x)) -> therefore Bridgeable(mable)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The fern dropforge the maud. The fern matte the maud. The maud is weeping. The bartlet dropforge the fern. The bartlet quiet the fern. The bartlet quiet the maud. The keelia dropforge the fern. If the bartlet quiet the keelia then the keelia matte the fern. If someone matte the maud and they need the maud then the maud quiet the bartlet. If someone is floccose and they see the keelia then the keelia is floccose. If someone quiet the bartlet and the bartlet dropforge the fern then they are ceremonial. If someone matte the fern then they are weeping. If someone dropforge the maud then they need the maud. If someone is floccose then they need the keelia. If someone is familiar and they chase the keelia then they are floccose. The bartlet is not ceremonial.", "logic": "\nDropforge(fern, maud)\nMatte(fern, maud)\nWeeping(maud)\nDropforge(bartlet, fern)\nQuiet(bartlet, fern)\nQuiet(bartlet, maud)\nDropforge(keelia, fern)\nQuiet(bartlet, keelia) -> Matte(keelia, fern)\nforall x (Matte(x, maud) and Quiet(x, maud) -> Quiet(maud, bartlet))\nforall x (Floccose(x) and Matte(x, keelia) -> Floccose(keelia))\nforall x (Quiet(x, bartlet) and Dropforge(bartlet, fern) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Matte(x, fern) -> Weeping(x))\nforall x (Dropforge(x, maud) -> Quiet(x, maud))\nforall x (Floccose(x) -> Quiet(x, keelia))\nforall x (Familiar(x) and Dropforge(x, keelia) -> Floccose(x))\n\nnot Ceremonial(bartlet)\n\nforall x (Quiet(x, bartlet) and Dropforge(bartlet, fern) -> Ceremonial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The wilbert uprise the clair. The wilbert bravo the clair. The clair is sublingual. The esau uprise the wilbert. The esau unhook the wilbert. The esau unhook the clair. The cicily uprise the wilbert. If the esau unhook the cicily then the cicily bravo the wilbert. If someone bravo the clair and they need the clair then the clair unhook the esau. If someone is terminable and they see the cicily then the cicily is terminable. If someone unhook the esau and the esau uprise the wilbert then they are ghostlike. If someone bravo the wilbert then they are sublingual. If someone uprise the clair then they need the clair. If someone is terminable then they need the cicily. If someone is manifest and they chase the cicily then they are terminable. The wilbert is terminable.", "logic": "\nUprise(wilbert, clair)\nBravo(wilbert, clair)\nSublingual(clair)\nUprise(esau, wilbert)\nUnhook(esau, wilbert)\nUnhook(esau, clair)\nUprise(cicily, wilbert)\nUnhook(esau, cicily) -> Bravo(cicily, wilbert)\nforall x (Bravo(x, clair) and Unhook(x, clair) -> Unhook(clair, esau))\nforall x (Terminable(x) and Bravo(x, cicily) -> Terminable(cicily))\nforall x (Unhook(x, esau) and Uprise(esau, wilbert) -> Ghostlike(x))\nforall x (Bravo(x, wilbert) -> Sublingual(x))\nforall x (Uprise(x, clair) -> Unhook(x, clair))\nforall x (Terminable(x) -> Unhook(x, cicily))\nforall x (Manifest(x) and Uprise(x, cicily) -> Terminable(x))\n\nTerminable(wilbert)\n\nforall x (Manifest(x) and Uprise(x, cicily) -> Terminable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The andrej fettle the coletta. The andrej fullback the coletta. The coletta is nourished. The betteann fettle the andrej. The betteann scrimmage the andrej. The betteann scrimmage the coletta. The shane fettle the andrej. If the betteann scrimmage the shane then the shane fullback the andrej. If someone fullback the coletta and they need the coletta then the coletta scrimmage the betteann. If someone is hardcore and they see the shane then the shane is hardcore. If someone scrimmage the betteann and the betteann fettle the andrej then they are haughty. If someone fullback the andrej then they are nourished. If someone fettle the coletta then they need the coletta. If someone is hardcore then they need the shane. If someone is forficate and they chase the shane then they are hardcore. The shane does not need the shane.", "logic": "\nFettle(andrej, coletta)\nFullback(andrej, coletta)\nNourished(coletta)\nFettle(betteann, andrej)\nScrimmage(betteann, andrej)\nScrimmage(betteann, coletta)\nFettle(shane, andrej)\nScrimmage(betteann, shane) -> Fullback(shane, andrej)\nforall x (Fullback(x, coletta) and Scrimmage(x, coletta) -> Scrimmage(coletta, betteann))\nforall x (Hardcore(x) and Fullback(x, shane) -> Hardcore(shane))\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, betteann) and Fettle(betteann, andrej) -> Haughty(x))\nforall x (Fullback(x, andrej) -> Nourished(x))\nforall x (Fettle(x, coletta) -> Scrimmage(x, coletta))\nforall x (Hardcore(x) -> Scrimmage(x, shane))\nforall x (Forficate(x) and Fettle(x, shane) -> Hardcore(x))\n\nnot Scrimmage(shane, shane)\n\nforall x (Hardcore(x) -> Scrimmage(x, shane)) <- forall x (Hardcore(x) and Fullback(x, shane) -> Hardcore(shane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The marcellus enamour the megen. The marcellus deem the megen. The megen is nonpolar. The ginnie enamour the marcellus. The ginnie goggle the marcellus. The ginnie goggle the megen. The didi enamour the marcellus. If the ginnie goggle the didi then the didi deem the marcellus. If someone deem the megen and they need the megen then the megen goggle the ginnie. If someone is sighted and they see the didi then the didi is sighted. If someone goggle the ginnie and the ginnie enamour the marcellus then they are gastric. If someone deem the marcellus then they are nonpolar. If someone enamour the megen then they need the megen. If someone is sighted then they need the didi. If someone is grungy and they chase the didi then they are sighted. The ginnie is nonpolar.", "logic": "\nEnamour(marcellus, megen)\nDeem(marcellus, megen)\nNonpolar(megen)\nEnamour(ginnie, marcellus)\nGoggle(ginnie, marcellus)\nGoggle(ginnie, megen)\nEnamour(didi, marcellus)\nGoggle(ginnie, didi) -> Deem(didi, marcellus)\nforall x (Deem(x, megen) and Goggle(x, megen) -> Goggle(megen, ginnie))\nforall x (Sighted(x) and Deem(x, didi) -> Sighted(didi))\nforall x (Goggle(x, ginnie) and Enamour(ginnie, marcellus) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Deem(x, marcellus) -> Nonpolar(x))\nforall x (Enamour(x, megen) -> Goggle(x, megen))\nforall x (Sighted(x) -> Goggle(x, didi))\nforall x (Grungy(x) and Enamour(x, didi) -> Sighted(x))\n\nNonpolar(ginnie)\n\nforall x (Deem(x, marcellus) -> Nonpolar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The ashleigh overstock the kenna. The ashleigh outshout the kenna. The kenna is flowery. The gerladina overstock the ashleigh. The gerladina harass the ashleigh. The gerladina harass the kenna. The otho overstock the ashleigh. If the gerladina harass the otho then the otho outshout the ashleigh. If someone outshout the kenna and they need the kenna then the kenna harass the gerladina. If someone is helpful and they see the otho then the otho is helpful. If someone harass the gerladina and the gerladina overstock the ashleigh then they are stemless. If someone outshout the ashleigh then they are flowery. If someone overstock the kenna then they need the kenna. If someone is helpful then they need the otho. If someone is escaped and they chase the otho then they are helpful. The otho is not escaped.", "logic": "\nOverstock(ashleigh, kenna)\nOutshout(ashleigh, kenna)\nFlowery(kenna)\nOverstock(gerladina, ashleigh)\nHarass(gerladina, ashleigh)\nHarass(gerladina, kenna)\nOverstock(otho, ashleigh)\nHarass(gerladina, otho) -> Outshout(otho, ashleigh)\nforall x (Outshout(x, kenna) and Harass(x, kenna) -> Harass(kenna, gerladina))\nforall x (Helpful(x) and Outshout(x, otho) -> Helpful(otho))\nforall x (Harass(x, gerladina) and Overstock(gerladina, ashleigh) -> Stemless(x))\nforall x (Outshout(x, ashleigh) -> Flowery(x))\nforall x (Overstock(x, kenna) -> Harass(x, kenna))\nforall x (Helpful(x) -> Harass(x, otho))\nforall x (Escaped(x) and Overstock(x, otho) -> Helpful(x))\n\nnot Escaped(otho)\n\nnot Escaped(otho) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The emily elegize the celestine. The emily schnorr the celestine. The celestine is tripping. The karilynn elegize the emily. The karilynn feast the emily. The karilynn feast the celestine. The barde elegize the emily. If the karilynn feast the barde then the barde schnorr the emily. If someone schnorr the celestine and they need the celestine then the celestine feast the karilynn. If someone is vestmental and they see the barde then the barde is vestmental. If someone feast the karilynn and the karilynn elegize the emily then they are brocaded. If someone schnorr the emily then they are tripping. If someone elegize the celestine then they need the celestine. If someone is vestmental then they need the barde. If someone is noteworthy and they chase the barde then they are vestmental. The celestine schnorr the karilynn.", "logic": "\nElegize(emily, celestine)\nSchnorr(emily, celestine)\nTripping(celestine)\nElegize(karilynn, emily)\nFeast(karilynn, emily)\nFeast(karilynn, celestine)\nElegize(barde, emily)\nFeast(karilynn, barde) -> Schnorr(barde, emily)\nforall x (Schnorr(x, celestine) and Feast(x, celestine) -> Feast(celestine, karilynn))\nforall x (Vestmental(x) and Schnorr(x, barde) -> Vestmental(barde))\nforall x (Feast(x, karilynn) and Elegize(karilynn, emily) -> Brocaded(x))\nforall x (Schnorr(x, emily) -> Tripping(x))\nforall x (Elegize(x, celestine) -> Feast(x, celestine))\nforall x (Vestmental(x) -> Feast(x, barde))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) and Elegize(x, barde) -> Vestmental(x))\n\nSchnorr(celestine, karilynn)\n\nSchnorr(celestine, karilynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The emil recant the elwood. The emil contradict the elwood. The elwood is predatory. The magnus recant the emil. The magnus whiff the emil. The magnus whiff the elwood. The roman recant the emil. If the magnus whiff the roman then the roman contradict the emil. If someone contradict the elwood and they need the elwood then the elwood whiff the magnus. If someone is acinic and they see the roman then the roman is acinic. If someone whiff the magnus and the magnus recant the emil then they are primitive. If someone contradict the emil then they are predatory. If someone recant the elwood then they need the elwood. If someone is acinic then they need the roman. If someone is centesimal and they chase the roman then they are acinic. The emil does not chase the roman.", "logic": "\nRecant(emil, elwood)\nContradict(emil, elwood)\nPredatory(elwood)\nRecant(magnus, emil)\nWhiff(magnus, emil)\nWhiff(magnus, elwood)\nRecant(roman, emil)\nWhiff(magnus, roman) -> Contradict(roman, emil)\nforall x (Contradict(x, elwood) and Whiff(x, elwood) -> Whiff(elwood, magnus))\nforall x (Acinic(x) and Contradict(x, roman) -> Acinic(roman))\nforall x (Whiff(x, magnus) and Recant(magnus, emil) -> Primitive(x))\nforall x (Contradict(x, emil) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Recant(x, elwood) -> Whiff(x, elwood))\nforall x (Acinic(x) -> Whiff(x, roman))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) and Recant(x, roman) -> Acinic(x))\n\nnot Recant(emil, roman)\n\nnot Recant(emil, roman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "The doreen console the rosy. The doreen poleaxe the rosy. The rosy is eternal. The magnus console the doreen. The magnus hoover the doreen. The magnus hoover the rosy. The reza console the doreen. If the magnus hoover the reza then the reza poleaxe the doreen. If someone poleaxe the rosy and they need the rosy then the rosy hoover the magnus. If someone is loathly and they see the reza then the reza is loathly. If someone hoover the magnus and the magnus console the doreen then they are fisheye. If someone poleaxe the doreen then they are eternal. If someone console the rosy then they need the rosy. If someone is loathly then they need the reza. If someone is statute and they chase the reza then they are loathly. The rosy poleaxe the rosy.", "logic": "\nConsole(doreen, rosy)\nPoleaxe(doreen, rosy)\nEternal(rosy)\nConsole(magnus, doreen)\nHoover(magnus, doreen)\nHoover(magnus, rosy)\nConsole(reza, doreen)\nHoover(magnus, reza) -> Poleaxe(reza, doreen)\nforall x (Poleaxe(x, rosy) and Hoover(x, rosy) -> Hoover(rosy, magnus))\nforall x (Loathly(x) and Poleaxe(x, reza) -> Loathly(reza))\nforall x (Hoover(x, magnus) and Console(magnus, doreen) -> Fisheye(x))\nforall x (Poleaxe(x, doreen) -> Eternal(x))\nforall x (Console(x, rosy) -> Hoover(x, rosy))\nforall x (Loathly(x) -> Hoover(x, reza))\nforall x (Statute(x) and Console(x, reza) -> Loathly(x))\n\nPoleaxe(rosy, rosy)\n\nPoleaxe(rosy, rosy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1351"} {"premises": "Verina is reformed. Verina is not motley. Ronen is reformed. Ronen is motley. Ronen is not erstwhile. Ronen is acold. Ronen is not agonizing. Abagael is gruesome. Abagael is plaintive. Abagael is agonizing. If something is reformed then it is acold. If something is acold and not motley then it is not erstwhile. If something is plaintive and not gruesome then it is erstwhile. All acold things are not erstwhile. All agonizing things are reformed. All agonizing things are reformed. Ronen is acold.", "logic": "\nReformed(verina)\nnot Motley(verina)\nReformed(ronen)\nMotley(ronen)\nnot Erstwhile(ronen)\nAcold(ronen)\nnot Agonizing(ronen)\nGruesome(abagael)\nPlaintive(abagael)\nAgonizing(abagael)\nforall x (Reformed(x) -> Acold(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) and not Motley(x) -> not Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) and not Gruesome(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) -> not Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) -> Reformed(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) -> Reformed(x))\n\nAcold(ronen)\n\ntherefore Acold(ronen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Lianna is ametabolic. Lianna is not splayfoot. Isobel is ametabolic. Isobel is splayfoot. Isobel is not scholarly. Isobel is prenominal. Isobel is not yogic. Kellia is voiceless. Kellia is symbolic. Kellia is yogic. If something is ametabolic then it is prenominal. If something is prenominal and not splayfoot then it is not scholarly. If something is symbolic and not voiceless then it is scholarly. All prenominal things are not scholarly. All yogic things are ametabolic. All yogic things are ametabolic. Isobel is not splayfoot.", "logic": "\nAmetabolic(lianna)\nnot Splayfoot(lianna)\nAmetabolic(isobel)\nSplayfoot(isobel)\nnot Scholarly(isobel)\nPrenominal(isobel)\nnot Yogic(isobel)\nVoiceless(kellia)\nSymbolic(kellia)\nYogic(kellia)\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) and not Splayfoot(x) -> not Scholarly(x))\nforall x (Symbolic(x) and not Voiceless(x) -> Scholarly(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> not Scholarly(x))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Ametabolic(x))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Ametabolic(x))\n\nnot Splayfoot(isobel)\n\ntherefore Splayfoot(isobel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Tiena is deformed. Tiena is not inboard. Rozella is deformed. Rozella is inboard. Rozella is not meagerly. Rozella is encrusted. Rozella is not awful. Chryste is melodic. Chryste is expansible. Chryste is awful. If something is deformed then it is encrusted. If something is encrusted and not inboard then it is not meagerly. If something is expansible and not melodic then it is meagerly. All encrusted things are not meagerly. All awful things are deformed. All awful things are deformed. Tiena is encrusted.", "logic": "\nDeformed(tiena)\nnot Inboard(tiena)\nDeformed(rozella)\nInboard(rozella)\nnot Meagerly(rozella)\nEncrusted(rozella)\nnot Awful(rozella)\nMelodic(chryste)\nExpansible(chryste)\nAwful(chryste)\nforall x (Deformed(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and not Inboard(x) -> not Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) and not Melodic(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> not Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Awful(x) -> Deformed(x))\nforall x (Awful(x) -> Deformed(x))\n\nEncrusted(tiena)\n\nDeformed(tiena) and forall x (Deformed(x) -> Encrusted(x)) -> therefore Encrusted(tiena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Rosalinde is fortunate. Rosalinde is not sharing. Davis is fortunate. Davis is sharing. Davis is not thumping. Davis is dyspnoeic. Davis is not alphameric. Oralle is spare. Oralle is clinquant. Oralle is alphameric. If something is fortunate then it is dyspnoeic. If something is dyspnoeic and not sharing then it is not thumping. If something is clinquant and not spare then it is thumping. All dyspnoeic things are not thumping. All alphameric things are fortunate. All alphameric things are fortunate. Rosalinde is not dyspnoeic.", "logic": "\nFortunate(rosalinde)\nnot Sharing(rosalinde)\nFortunate(davis)\nSharing(davis)\nnot Thumping(davis)\nDyspnoeic(davis)\nnot Alphameric(davis)\nSpare(oralle)\nClinquant(oralle)\nAlphameric(oralle)\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and not Sharing(x) -> not Thumping(x))\nforall x (Clinquant(x) and not Spare(x) -> Thumping(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> not Thumping(x))\nforall x (Alphameric(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Alphameric(x) -> Fortunate(x))\n\nnot Dyspnoeic(rosalinde)\n\nFortunate(rosalinde) and forall x (Fortunate(x) -> Dyspnoeic(x)) -> therefore Dyspnoeic(rosalinde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Mala is engrossing. Mala is not durable. Rutger is engrossing. Rutger is durable. Rutger is not auroral. Rutger is flagrant. Rutger is not toneless. Yehudi is disliked. Yehudi is beaked. Yehudi is toneless. If something is engrossing then it is flagrant. If something is flagrant and not durable then it is not auroral. If something is beaked and not disliked then it is auroral. All flagrant things are not auroral. All toneless things are engrossing. All toneless things are engrossing. Yehudi is flagrant.", "logic": "\nEngrossing(mala)\nnot Durable(mala)\nEngrossing(rutger)\nDurable(rutger)\nnot Auroral(rutger)\nFlagrant(rutger)\nnot Toneless(rutger)\nDisliked(yehudi)\nBeaked(yehudi)\nToneless(yehudi)\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) and not Durable(x) -> not Auroral(x))\nforall x (Beaked(x) and not Disliked(x) -> Auroral(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> not Auroral(x))\nforall x (Toneless(x) -> Engrossing(x))\nforall x (Toneless(x) -> Engrossing(x))\n\nFlagrant(yehudi)\n\nToneless(yehudi) and forall x (Toneless(x) -> Engrossing(x)) -> therefore Engrossing(yehudi) Engrossing(yehudi) and forall x (Engrossing(x) -> Flagrant(x)) -> therefore Flagrant(yehudi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Mahmud is nineteenth. Mahmud is not awing. Tanner is nineteenth. Tanner is awing. Tanner is not geriatric. Tanner is nosey. Tanner is not celestial. Tibold is jungly. Tibold is unreached. Tibold is celestial. If something is nineteenth then it is nosey. If something is nosey and not awing then it is not geriatric. If something is unreached and not jungly then it is geriatric. All nosey things are not geriatric. All celestial things are nineteenth. All celestial things are nineteenth. Mahmud is geriatric.", "logic": "\nNineteenth(mahmud)\nnot Awing(mahmud)\nNineteenth(tanner)\nAwing(tanner)\nnot Geriatric(tanner)\nNosey(tanner)\nnot Celestial(tanner)\nJungly(tibold)\nUnreached(tibold)\nCelestial(tibold)\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) -> Nosey(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) and not Awing(x) -> not Geriatric(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and not Jungly(x) -> Geriatric(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) -> not Geriatric(x))\nforall x (Celestial(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Celestial(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\n\nGeriatric(mahmud)\n\nNineteenth(mahmud) and forall x (Nineteenth(x) -> Nosey(x)) -> therefore Nosey(mahmud) Nosey(mahmud) and forall x (Nosey(x) -> not Geriatric(x)) -> therefore not Geriatric(mahmud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Merlin is taloned. Merlin is not xlii. Sula is taloned. Sula is xlii. Sula is not posed. Sula is bittie. Sula is not bookable. Curtice is chichi. Curtice is nervy. Curtice is bookable. If something is taloned then it is bittie. If something is bittie and not xlii then it is not posed. If something is nervy and not chichi then it is posed. All bittie things are not posed. All bookable things are taloned. All bookable things are taloned. Curtice is not posed.", "logic": "\nTaloned(merlin)\nnot Xlii(merlin)\nTaloned(sula)\nXlii(sula)\nnot Posed(sula)\nBittie(sula)\nnot Bookable(sula)\nChichi(curtice)\nNervy(curtice)\nBookable(curtice)\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> Bittie(x))\nforall x (Bittie(x) and not Xlii(x) -> not Posed(x))\nforall x (Nervy(x) and not Chichi(x) -> Posed(x))\nforall x (Bittie(x) -> not Posed(x))\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Taloned(x))\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Taloned(x))\n\nnot Posed(curtice)\n\nBookable(curtice) and forall x (Bookable(x) -> Taloned(x)) -> therefore Taloned(curtice) Taloned(curtice) and forall x (Taloned(x) -> Bittie(x)) -> therefore Bittie(curtice) Bittie(curtice) and forall x (Bittie(x) -> not Posed(x)) -> therefore not Posed(curtice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Jessica is canned. Jessica is not rheologic. Dieter is canned. Dieter is rheologic. Dieter is not snakelike. Dieter is transitory. Dieter is not unsalable. Alison is aramean. Alison is pistillate. Alison is unsalable. If something is canned then it is transitory. If something is transitory and not rheologic then it is not snakelike. If something is pistillate and not aramean then it is snakelike. All transitory things are not snakelike. All unsalable things are canned. All unsalable things are canned. Alison is snakelike.", "logic": "\nCanned(jessica)\nnot Rheologic(jessica)\nCanned(dieter)\nRheologic(dieter)\nnot Snakelike(dieter)\nTransitory(dieter)\nnot Unsalable(dieter)\nAramean(alison)\nPistillate(alison)\nUnsalable(alison)\nforall x (Canned(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) and not Rheologic(x) -> not Snakelike(x))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) and not Aramean(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> not Snakelike(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Canned(x))\n\nSnakelike(alison)\n\nUnsalable(alison) and forall x (Unsalable(x) -> Canned(x)) -> therefore Canned(alison) Canned(alison) and forall x (Canned(x) -> Transitory(x)) -> therefore Transitory(alison) Transitory(alison) and forall x (Transitory(x) -> not Snakelike(x)) -> therefore not Snakelike(alison)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Consuelo is couth. Consuelo is not canescent. Matilda is couth. Matilda is canescent. Matilda is not operable. Matilda is southwest. Matilda is not backstairs. Costa is swift. Costa is sandy. Costa is backstairs. If something is couth then it is southwest. If something is southwest and not canescent then it is not operable. If something is sandy and not swift then it is operable. All southwest things are not operable. All backstairs things are couth. All backstairs things are couth. Matilda is not sandy.", "logic": "\nCouth(consuelo)\nnot Canescent(consuelo)\nCouth(matilda)\nCanescent(matilda)\nnot Operable(matilda)\nSouthwest(matilda)\nnot Backstairs(matilda)\nSwift(costa)\nSandy(costa)\nBackstairs(costa)\nforall x (Couth(x) -> Southwest(x))\nforall x (Southwest(x) and not Canescent(x) -> not Operable(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) and not Swift(x) -> Operable(x))\nforall x (Southwest(x) -> not Operable(x))\nforall x (Backstairs(x) -> Couth(x))\nforall x (Backstairs(x) -> Couth(x))\n\nnot Sandy(matilda)\n\nnot Sandy(matilda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Linnie is dilettante. Linnie is not interred. Zeus is dilettante. Zeus is interred. Zeus is not upstart. Zeus is drifting. Zeus is not erstwhile. Meridith is erroneous. Meridith is lxviii. Meridith is erstwhile. If something is dilettante then it is drifting. If something is drifting and not interred then it is not upstart. If something is lxviii and not erroneous then it is upstart. All drifting things are not upstart. All erstwhile things are dilettante. All erstwhile things are dilettante. Linnie is erroneous.", "logic": "\nDilettante(linnie)\nnot Interred(linnie)\nDilettante(zeus)\nInterred(zeus)\nnot Upstart(zeus)\nDrifting(zeus)\nnot Erstwhile(zeus)\nErroneous(meridith)\nLxviii(meridith)\nErstwhile(meridith)\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) and not Interred(x) -> not Upstart(x))\nforall x (Lxviii(x) and not Erroneous(x) -> Upstart(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> not Upstart(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Dilettante(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Dilettante(x))\n\nErroneous(linnie)\n\nErroneous(linnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Brigitte is disjunct. Brigitte is not carbonyl. Antonina is disjunct. Antonina is carbonyl. Antonina is not autoicous. Antonina is silicious. Antonina is not acold. Adolpho is agleam. Adolpho is running. Adolpho is acold. If something is disjunct then it is silicious. If something is silicious and not carbonyl then it is not autoicous. If something is running and not agleam then it is autoicous. All silicious things are not autoicous. All acold things are disjunct. All acold things are disjunct. Adolpho is not carbonyl.", "logic": "\nDisjunct(brigitte)\nnot Carbonyl(brigitte)\nDisjunct(antonina)\nCarbonyl(antonina)\nnot Autoicous(antonina)\nSilicious(antonina)\nnot Acold(antonina)\nAgleam(adolpho)\nRunning(adolpho)\nAcold(adolpho)\nforall x (Disjunct(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Silicious(x) and not Carbonyl(x) -> not Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Running(x) and not Agleam(x) -> Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Silicious(x) -> not Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) -> Disjunct(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) -> Disjunct(x))\n\nnot Carbonyl(adolpho)\n\nnot Carbonyl(adolpho) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Teador is noncaloric. Teador is not repressing. Rosemary is noncaloric. Rosemary is repressing. Rosemary is not abundant. Rosemary is scrofulous. Rosemary is not sacerdotal. Elliot is bungaloid. Elliot is midget. Elliot is sacerdotal. If something is noncaloric then it is scrofulous. If something is scrofulous and not repressing then it is not abundant. If something is midget and not bungaloid then it is abundant. All scrofulous things are not abundant. All sacerdotal things are noncaloric. All sacerdotal things are noncaloric. Teador is midget.", "logic": "\nNoncaloric(teador)\nnot Repressing(teador)\nNoncaloric(rosemary)\nRepressing(rosemary)\nnot Abundant(rosemary)\nScrofulous(rosemary)\nnot Sacerdotal(rosemary)\nBungaloid(elliot)\nMidget(elliot)\nSacerdotal(elliot)\nforall x (Noncaloric(x) -> Scrofulous(x))\nforall x (Scrofulous(x) and not Repressing(x) -> not Abundant(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) and not Bungaloid(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Scrofulous(x) -> not Abundant(x))\nforall x (Sacerdotal(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Sacerdotal(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\n\nMidget(teador)\n\nMidget(teador) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Ingrid is cubist. Ingrid is not pyaemic. Mathias is cubist. Mathias is pyaemic. Mathias is not jade. Mathias is noncurrent. Mathias is not dysgenic. Jehanna is serpentine. Jehanna is auxetic. Jehanna is dysgenic. If something is cubist then it is noncurrent. If something is noncurrent and not pyaemic then it is not jade. If something is auxetic and not serpentine then it is jade. All noncurrent things are not jade. All dysgenic things are cubist. All dysgenic things are cubist. Ingrid is not dysgenic.", "logic": "\nCubist(ingrid)\nnot Pyaemic(ingrid)\nCubist(mathias)\nPyaemic(mathias)\nnot Jade(mathias)\nNoncurrent(mathias)\nnot Dysgenic(mathias)\nSerpentine(jehanna)\nAuxetic(jehanna)\nDysgenic(jehanna)\nforall x (Cubist(x) -> Noncurrent(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) and not Pyaemic(x) -> not Jade(x))\nforall x (Auxetic(x) and not Serpentine(x) -> Jade(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) -> not Jade(x))\nforall x (Dysgenic(x) -> Cubist(x))\nforall x (Dysgenic(x) -> Cubist(x))\n\nnot Dysgenic(ingrid)\n\nnot Dysgenic(ingrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Annadiana is observing. Annadiana is not pinioned. Wenona is observing. Wenona is pinioned. Wenona is not deist. Wenona is concentric. Wenona is not defending. Roana is dipolar. Roana is unawed. Roana is defending. If something is observing then it is concentric. If something is concentric and not pinioned then it is not deist. If something is unawed and not dipolar then it is deist. All concentric things are not deist. All defending things are observing. All defending things are observing. Wenona is dipolar.", "logic": "\nObserving(annadiana)\nnot Pinioned(annadiana)\nObserving(wenona)\nPinioned(wenona)\nnot Deist(wenona)\nConcentric(wenona)\nnot Defending(wenona)\nDipolar(roana)\nUnawed(roana)\nDefending(roana)\nforall x (Observing(x) -> Concentric(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) and not Pinioned(x) -> not Deist(x))\nforall x (Unawed(x) and not Dipolar(x) -> Deist(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> not Deist(x))\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Observing(x))\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Observing(x))\n\nDipolar(wenona)\n\nDipolar(wenona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-451"} {"premises": "Marcio is calendered. Bonita is unpatented. Caspar is calendered. Marje is tonguelike. Blue things are indonesian. If Marcio is trabeate and Marcio is indonesian then Marcio is thirtieth. Marcio is calendered.", "logic": "\nCalendered(marcio)\nUnpatented(bonita)\nCalendered(caspar)\nTonguelike(marje)\nforall x (Trabeate(x) -> Indonesian(x))\nTrabeate(marcio) and Indonesian(marcio) -> Thirtieth(marcio)\n\nCalendered(marcio)\n\ntherefore Calendered(marcio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7174"} {"premises": "Katherine is agile. Wilona is unsociable. Elianore is agile. Donia is cycloid. Blue things are cymose. If Katherine is mozambican and Katherine is cymose then Katherine is nethermost. Katherine is not agile.", "logic": "\nAgile(katherine)\nUnsociable(wilona)\nAgile(elianore)\nCycloid(donia)\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> Cymose(x))\nMozambican(katherine) and Cymose(katherine) -> Nethermost(katherine)\n\nnot Agile(katherine)\n\ntherefore Agile(katherine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7174"} {"premises": "Evvy is shattering. Lauretta is hipless. Suzann is shattering. Marylinda is rowdy. Blue things are despotical. If Evvy is alvine and Evvy is despotical then Evvy is turbid. Marylinda is not despotical.", "logic": "\nShattering(evvy)\nHipless(lauretta)\nShattering(suzann)\nRowdy(marylinda)\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Despotical(x))\nAlvine(evvy) and Despotical(evvy) -> Turbid(evvy)\n\nnot Despotical(marylinda)\n\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Despotical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7174"} {"premises": "Lindsay is thematic. Owen is treacly. Angelique is thematic. Idell is caespitose. Blue things are systematic. If Lindsay is baggy and Lindsay is systematic then Lindsay is agamous. Owen is thematic.", "logic": "\nThematic(lindsay)\nTreacly(owen)\nThematic(angelique)\nCaespitose(idell)\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Systematic(x))\nBaggy(lindsay) and Systematic(lindsay) -> Agamous(lindsay)\n\nThematic(owen)\n\nThematic(owen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7174"} {"premises": "Kaitlyn is wireless. Faustina is wrong. Faustina is ictic. If Kaitlyn is relevant then Kaitlyn is wireless. If Kaitlyn is relevant then Kaitlyn is not cheerful. If Kaitlyn is cheerful then Kaitlyn is relevant. All just people are not relevant. If Faustina is just and Faustina is relevant then Faustina is not wrong. If Kaitlyn is wireless then Kaitlyn is spouting. If someone is spouting and not cheerful then they are wireless. If someone is just and wrong then they are not wireless. Faustina is ictic.", "logic": "\nWireless(kaitlyn)\nWrong(faustina)\nIctic(faustina)\nRelevant(kaitlyn) -> Wireless(kaitlyn)\nRelevant(kaitlyn) -> not Cheerful(kaitlyn)\nCheerful(kaitlyn) -> Relevant(kaitlyn)\nforall x (Just(x) -> not Relevant(x))\nJust(faustina) and Relevant(faustina) -> not Wrong(faustina)\nWireless(kaitlyn) -> Spouting(kaitlyn)\nforall x (Spouting(x) and not Cheerful(x) -> Wireless(x))\nforall x (Just(x) and Wrong(x) -> not Wireless(x))\n\nIctic(faustina)\n\ntherefore Ictic(faustina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4454"} {"premises": "Liz is delightful. Agna is jointed. Agna is ephemeral. If Liz is drinkable then Liz is delightful. If Liz is drinkable then Liz is not sopranino. If Liz is sopranino then Liz is drinkable. All temperate people are not drinkable. If Agna is temperate and Agna is drinkable then Agna is not jointed. If Liz is delightful then Liz is incautious. If someone is incautious and not sopranino then they are delightful. If someone is temperate and jointed then they are not delightful. Agna is not ephemeral.", "logic": "\nDelightful(liz)\nJointed(agna)\nEphemeral(agna)\nDrinkable(liz) -> Delightful(liz)\nDrinkable(liz) -> not Sopranino(liz)\nSopranino(liz) -> Drinkable(liz)\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> not Drinkable(x))\nTemperate(agna) and Drinkable(agna) -> not Jointed(agna)\nDelightful(liz) -> Incautious(liz)\nforall x (Incautious(x) and not Sopranino(x) -> Delightful(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) and Jointed(x) -> not Delightful(x))\n\nnot Ephemeral(agna)\n\ntherefore Ephemeral(agna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4454"} {"premises": "Ursuline is dysgenic. Cordelia is polydactyl. Cordelia is unique. If Ursuline is barbarous then Ursuline is dysgenic. If Ursuline is barbarous then Ursuline is not whacked. If Ursuline is whacked then Ursuline is barbarous. All roan people are not barbarous. If Cordelia is roan and Cordelia is barbarous then Cordelia is not polydactyl. If Ursuline is dysgenic then Ursuline is forcible. If someone is forcible and not whacked then they are dysgenic. If someone is roan and polydactyl then they are not dysgenic. Ursuline is not barbarous.", "logic": "\nDysgenic(ursuline)\nPolydactyl(cordelia)\nUnique(cordelia)\nBarbarous(ursuline) -> Dysgenic(ursuline)\nBarbarous(ursuline) -> not Whacked(ursuline)\nWhacked(ursuline) -> Barbarous(ursuline)\nforall x (Roan(x) -> not Barbarous(x))\nRoan(cordelia) and Barbarous(cordelia) -> not Polydactyl(cordelia)\nDysgenic(ursuline) -> Forcible(ursuline)\nforall x (Forcible(x) and not Whacked(x) -> Dysgenic(x))\nforall x (Roan(x) and Polydactyl(x) -> not Dysgenic(x))\n\nnot Barbarous(ursuline)\n\nWhacked(ursuline) -> Barbarous(ursuline) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4454"} {"premises": "Burnaby is presbyopic. Traver is irritative. Traver is judicial. If Burnaby is pederastic then Burnaby is presbyopic. If Burnaby is pederastic then Burnaby is not precocial. If Burnaby is precocial then Burnaby is pederastic. All cumuliform people are not pederastic. If Traver is cumuliform and Traver is pederastic then Traver is not irritative. If Burnaby is presbyopic then Burnaby is crumbly. If someone is crumbly and not precocial then they are presbyopic. If someone is cumuliform and irritative then they are not presbyopic. Burnaby is judicial.", "logic": "\nPresbyopic(burnaby)\nIrritative(traver)\nJudicial(traver)\nPederastic(burnaby) -> Presbyopic(burnaby)\nPederastic(burnaby) -> not Precocial(burnaby)\nPrecocial(burnaby) -> Pederastic(burnaby)\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) -> not Pederastic(x))\nCumuliform(traver) and Pederastic(traver) -> not Irritative(traver)\nPresbyopic(burnaby) -> Crumbly(burnaby)\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and not Precocial(x) -> Presbyopic(x))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) and Irritative(x) -> not Presbyopic(x))\n\nJudicial(burnaby)\n\nJudicial(burnaby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4454"} {"premises": "Laina is ignitible. Laina is guiltless. Laina is baptistic. Laina is fistular. Laina is local. Laina is euphoric. Laina is not even. Nanette is ignitible. Nanette is not guiltless. Nanette is baptistic. Nanette is fistular. Nanette is local. Nanette is euphoric. Nanette is even. If something is ignitible then it is euphoric. If Nanette is local and Nanette is not fistular then Nanette is guiltless. Furry things are local. Laina is not even.", "logic": "\nIgnitible(laina)\nGuiltless(laina)\nBaptistic(laina)\nFistular(laina)\nLocal(laina)\nEuphoric(laina)\nnot Even(laina)\nIgnitible(nanette)\nnot Guiltless(nanette)\nBaptistic(nanette)\nFistular(nanette)\nLocal(nanette)\nEuphoric(nanette)\nEven(nanette)\nforall x (Ignitible(x) -> Euphoric(x))\nLocal(nanette) and not Fistular(nanette) -> Guiltless(nanette)\nforall x (Guiltless(x) -> Local(x))\n\nnot Even(laina)\n\ntherefore not Even(laina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2295"} {"premises": "Karia is overweight. Karia is rasping. Karia is isotropic. Karia is utilizable. Karia is amateurish. Karia is untimely. Karia is not acarpous. Elvira is overweight. Elvira is not rasping. Elvira is isotropic. Elvira is utilizable. Elvira is amateurish. Elvira is untimely. Elvira is acarpous. If something is overweight then it is untimely. If Elvira is amateurish and Elvira is not utilizable then Elvira is rasping. Furry things are amateurish. Elvira is not utilizable.", "logic": "\nOverweight(karia)\nRasping(karia)\nIsotropic(karia)\nUtilizable(karia)\nAmateurish(karia)\nUntimely(karia)\nnot Acarpous(karia)\nOverweight(elvira)\nnot Rasping(elvira)\nIsotropic(elvira)\nUtilizable(elvira)\nAmateurish(elvira)\nUntimely(elvira)\nAcarpous(elvira)\nforall x (Overweight(x) -> Untimely(x))\nAmateurish(elvira) and not Utilizable(elvira) -> Rasping(elvira)\nforall x (Rasping(x) -> Amateurish(x))\n\nnot Utilizable(elvira)\n\ntherefore Utilizable(elvira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2295"} {"premises": "Uli is capable. Emmanuel is marketable. Emmanuel is conjugated. Emmanuel is profound. Emmanuel is directing. Emmanuel is capable. Emmanuel is silly. Emmanuel is exculpated. Trisha is marketable. Trisha is conjugated. Trisha is profound. Trisha is directing. Trisha is capable. Trisha is silly. Trisha is exculpated. If someone is conjugated and silly then they are profound. If Trisha is silly then Trisha is conjugated. Cold, directing people are exculpated. If someone is capable then they are exculpated. White, capable people are profound. All conjugated, profound people are marketable. All profound, exculpated people are silly. All marketable, silly people are exculpated. Emmanuel is conjugated.", "logic": "\nCapable(uli)\nMarketable(emmanuel)\nConjugated(emmanuel)\nProfound(emmanuel)\nDirecting(emmanuel)\nCapable(emmanuel)\nSilly(emmanuel)\nExculpated(emmanuel)\nMarketable(trisha)\nConjugated(trisha)\nProfound(trisha)\nDirecting(trisha)\nCapable(trisha)\nSilly(trisha)\nExculpated(trisha)\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Silly(x) -> Profound(x))\nSilly(trisha) -> Conjugated(trisha)\nforall x (Profound(x) and Directing(x) -> Exculpated(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Exculpated(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) and Capable(x) -> Profound(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Profound(x) -> Marketable(x))\nforall x (Profound(x) and Exculpated(x) -> Silly(x))\nforall x (Marketable(x) and Silly(x) -> Exculpated(x))\n\nConjugated(emmanuel)\n\ntherefore Conjugated(emmanuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Leighton is exclusive. Kippy is stormy. Kippy is autacoidal. Kippy is osteal. Kippy is influent. Kippy is exclusive. Kippy is euphoric. Kippy is beaming. Robina is stormy. Robina is autacoidal. Robina is osteal. Robina is influent. Robina is exclusive. Robina is euphoric. Robina is beaming. If someone is autacoidal and euphoric then they are osteal. If Robina is euphoric then Robina is autacoidal. Cold, influent people are beaming. If someone is exclusive then they are beaming. White, exclusive people are osteal. All autacoidal, osteal people are stormy. All osteal, beaming people are euphoric. All stormy, euphoric people are beaming. Kippy is not stormy.", "logic": "\nExclusive(leighton)\nStormy(kippy)\nAutacoidal(kippy)\nOsteal(kippy)\nInfluent(kippy)\nExclusive(kippy)\nEuphoric(kippy)\nBeaming(kippy)\nStormy(robina)\nAutacoidal(robina)\nOsteal(robina)\nInfluent(robina)\nExclusive(robina)\nEuphoric(robina)\nBeaming(robina)\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and Euphoric(x) -> Osteal(x))\nEuphoric(robina) -> Autacoidal(robina)\nforall x (Osteal(x) and Influent(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Beaming(x) and Exclusive(x) -> Osteal(x))\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and Osteal(x) -> Stormy(x))\nforall x (Osteal(x) and Beaming(x) -> Euphoric(x))\nforall x (Stormy(x) and Euphoric(x) -> Beaming(x))\n\nnot Stormy(kippy)\n\ntherefore Stormy(kippy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Wildon is fulminant. Lidia is biblical. Lidia is seared. Lidia is aphoristic. Lidia is biological. Lidia is fulminant. Lidia is gandhian. Lidia is genteel. Haily is biblical. Haily is seared. Haily is aphoristic. Haily is biological. Haily is fulminant. Haily is gandhian. Haily is genteel. If someone is seared and gandhian then they are aphoristic. If Haily is gandhian then Haily is seared. Cold, biological people are genteel. If someone is fulminant then they are genteel. White, fulminant people are aphoristic. All seared, aphoristic people are biblical. All aphoristic, genteel people are gandhian. All biblical, gandhian people are genteel. Wildon is genteel.", "logic": "\nFulminant(wildon)\nBiblical(lidia)\nSeared(lidia)\nAphoristic(lidia)\nBiological(lidia)\nFulminant(lidia)\nGandhian(lidia)\nGenteel(lidia)\nBiblical(haily)\nSeared(haily)\nAphoristic(haily)\nBiological(haily)\nFulminant(haily)\nGandhian(haily)\nGenteel(haily)\nforall x (Seared(x) and Gandhian(x) -> Aphoristic(x))\nGandhian(haily) -> Seared(haily)\nforall x (Aphoristic(x) and Biological(x) -> Genteel(x))\nforall x (Fulminant(x) -> Genteel(x))\nforall x (Genteel(x) and Fulminant(x) -> Aphoristic(x))\nforall x (Seared(x) and Aphoristic(x) -> Biblical(x))\nforall x (Aphoristic(x) and Genteel(x) -> Gandhian(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) and Gandhian(x) -> Genteel(x))\n\nGenteel(wildon)\n\nFulminant(wildon) and forall x (Fulminant(x) -> Genteel(x)) -> therefore Genteel(wildon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Gretna is ageless. Gallagher is doable. Gallagher is homosexual. Gallagher is scorched. Gallagher is bipartisan. Gallagher is ageless. Gallagher is itchy. Gallagher is centered. Irvine is doable. Irvine is homosexual. Irvine is scorched. Irvine is bipartisan. Irvine is ageless. Irvine is itchy. Irvine is centered. If someone is homosexual and itchy then they are scorched. If Irvine is itchy then Irvine is homosexual. Cold, bipartisan people are centered. If someone is ageless then they are centered. White, ageless people are scorched. All homosexual, scorched people are doable. All scorched, centered people are itchy. All doable, itchy people are centered. Gretna is not centered.", "logic": "\nAgeless(gretna)\nDoable(gallagher)\nHomosexual(gallagher)\nScorched(gallagher)\nBipartisan(gallagher)\nAgeless(gallagher)\nItchy(gallagher)\nCentered(gallagher)\nDoable(irvine)\nHomosexual(irvine)\nScorched(irvine)\nBipartisan(irvine)\nAgeless(irvine)\nItchy(irvine)\nCentered(irvine)\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Itchy(x) -> Scorched(x))\nItchy(irvine) -> Homosexual(irvine)\nforall x (Scorched(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) and Ageless(x) -> Scorched(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Scorched(x) -> Doable(x))\nforall x (Scorched(x) and Centered(x) -> Itchy(x))\nforall x (Doable(x) and Itchy(x) -> Centered(x))\n\nnot Centered(gretna)\n\nAgeless(gretna) and forall x (Ageless(x) -> Centered(x)) -> therefore Centered(gretna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Verina is spendable. Cecilia is accessory. Cecilia is wideband. Cecilia is branchiate. Cecilia is pemphigous. Cecilia is spendable. Cecilia is toxic. Cecilia is ventricous. Katuscha is accessory. Katuscha is wideband. Katuscha is branchiate. Katuscha is pemphigous. Katuscha is spendable. Katuscha is toxic. Katuscha is ventricous. If someone is wideband and toxic then they are branchiate. If Katuscha is toxic then Katuscha is wideband. Cold, pemphigous people are ventricous. If someone is spendable then they are ventricous. White, spendable people are branchiate. All wideband, branchiate people are accessory. All branchiate, ventricous people are toxic. All accessory, toxic people are ventricous. Verina is branchiate.", "logic": "\nSpendable(verina)\nAccessory(cecilia)\nWideband(cecilia)\nBranchiate(cecilia)\nPemphigous(cecilia)\nSpendable(cecilia)\nToxic(cecilia)\nVentricous(cecilia)\nAccessory(katuscha)\nWideband(katuscha)\nBranchiate(katuscha)\nPemphigous(katuscha)\nSpendable(katuscha)\nToxic(katuscha)\nVentricous(katuscha)\nforall x (Wideband(x) and Toxic(x) -> Branchiate(x))\nToxic(katuscha) -> Wideband(katuscha)\nforall x (Branchiate(x) and Pemphigous(x) -> Ventricous(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Ventricous(x))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and Spendable(x) -> Branchiate(x))\nforall x (Wideband(x) and Branchiate(x) -> Accessory(x))\nforall x (Branchiate(x) and Ventricous(x) -> Toxic(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Toxic(x) -> Ventricous(x))\n\nBranchiate(verina)\n\nSpendable(verina) and forall x (Spendable(x) -> Ventricous(x)) -> therefore Ventricous(verina) Ventricous(verina) and Spendable(verina) and forall x (Ventricous(x) and Spendable(x) -> Branchiate(x)) -> therefore Branchiate(verina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Rafe is carsick. Gilles is stringent. Gilles is floral. Gilles is falling. Gilles is dispirited. Gilles is carsick. Gilles is doped. Gilles is edited. Chickie is stringent. Chickie is floral. Chickie is falling. Chickie is dispirited. Chickie is carsick. Chickie is doped. Chickie is edited. If someone is floral and doped then they are falling. If Chickie is doped then Chickie is floral. Cold, dispirited people are edited. If someone is carsick then they are edited. White, carsick people are falling. All floral, falling people are stringent. All falling, edited people are doped. All stringent, doped people are edited. Rafe is not falling.", "logic": "\nCarsick(rafe)\nStringent(gilles)\nFloral(gilles)\nFalling(gilles)\nDispirited(gilles)\nCarsick(gilles)\nDoped(gilles)\nEdited(gilles)\nStringent(chickie)\nFloral(chickie)\nFalling(chickie)\nDispirited(chickie)\nCarsick(chickie)\nDoped(chickie)\nEdited(chickie)\nforall x (Floral(x) and Doped(x) -> Falling(x))\nDoped(chickie) -> Floral(chickie)\nforall x (Falling(x) and Dispirited(x) -> Edited(x))\nforall x (Carsick(x) -> Edited(x))\nforall x (Edited(x) and Carsick(x) -> Falling(x))\nforall x (Floral(x) and Falling(x) -> Stringent(x))\nforall x (Falling(x) and Edited(x) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Stringent(x) and Doped(x) -> Edited(x))\n\nnot Falling(rafe)\n\nCarsick(rafe) and forall x (Carsick(x) -> Edited(x)) -> therefore Edited(rafe) Edited(rafe) and Carsick(rafe) and forall x (Edited(x) and Carsick(x) -> Falling(x)) -> therefore Falling(rafe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Olle is synchronic. Lolly is undulant. Lolly is unborn. Lolly is deist. Lolly is declarable. Lolly is synchronic. Lolly is wigless. Lolly is vulgar. Laure is undulant. Laure is unborn. Laure is deist. Laure is declarable. Laure is synchronic. Laure is wigless. Laure is vulgar. If someone is unborn and wigless then they are deist. If Laure is wigless then Laure is unborn. Cold, declarable people are vulgar. If someone is synchronic then they are vulgar. White, synchronic people are deist. All unborn, deist people are undulant. All deist, vulgar people are wigless. All undulant, wigless people are vulgar. Olle is wigless.", "logic": "\nSynchronic(olle)\nUndulant(lolly)\nUnborn(lolly)\nDeist(lolly)\nDeclarable(lolly)\nSynchronic(lolly)\nWigless(lolly)\nVulgar(lolly)\nUndulant(laure)\nUnborn(laure)\nDeist(laure)\nDeclarable(laure)\nSynchronic(laure)\nWigless(laure)\nVulgar(laure)\nforall x (Unborn(x) and Wigless(x) -> Deist(x))\nWigless(laure) -> Unborn(laure)\nforall x (Deist(x) and Declarable(x) -> Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Synchronic(x) -> Vulgar(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) and Synchronic(x) -> Deist(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) and Deist(x) -> Undulant(x))\nforall x (Deist(x) and Vulgar(x) -> Wigless(x))\nforall x (Undulant(x) and Wigless(x) -> Vulgar(x))\n\nWigless(olle)\n\nSynchronic(olle) and forall x (Synchronic(x) -> Vulgar(x)) -> therefore Vulgar(olle) Vulgar(olle) and Synchronic(olle) and forall x (Vulgar(x) and Synchronic(x) -> Deist(x)) -> therefore Deist(olle) Synchronic(olle) and forall x (Synchronic(x) -> Vulgar(x)) -> therefore Vulgar(olle) Deist(olle) and Vulgar(olle) and forall x (Deist(x) and Vulgar(x) -> Wigless(x)) -> therefore Wigless(olle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Dimitri is ponderous. Fara is astonied. Fara is blueish. Fara is unearned. Fara is discerning. Fara is ponderous. Fara is fastigiate. Fara is altricial. Goldie is astonied. Goldie is blueish. Goldie is unearned. Goldie is discerning. Goldie is ponderous. Goldie is fastigiate. Goldie is altricial. If someone is blueish and fastigiate then they are unearned. If Goldie is fastigiate then Goldie is blueish. Cold, discerning people are altricial. If someone is ponderous then they are altricial. White, ponderous people are unearned. All blueish, unearned people are astonied. All unearned, altricial people are fastigiate. All astonied, fastigiate people are altricial. Dimitri is not fastigiate.", "logic": "\nPonderous(dimitri)\nAstonied(fara)\nBlueish(fara)\nUnearned(fara)\nDiscerning(fara)\nPonderous(fara)\nFastigiate(fara)\nAltricial(fara)\nAstonied(goldie)\nBlueish(goldie)\nUnearned(goldie)\nDiscerning(goldie)\nPonderous(goldie)\nFastigiate(goldie)\nAltricial(goldie)\nforall x (Blueish(x) and Fastigiate(x) -> Unearned(x))\nFastigiate(goldie) -> Blueish(goldie)\nforall x (Unearned(x) and Discerning(x) -> Altricial(x))\nforall x (Ponderous(x) -> Altricial(x))\nforall x (Altricial(x) and Ponderous(x) -> Unearned(x))\nforall x (Blueish(x) and Unearned(x) -> Astonied(x))\nforall x (Unearned(x) and Altricial(x) -> Fastigiate(x))\nforall x (Astonied(x) and Fastigiate(x) -> Altricial(x))\n\nnot Fastigiate(dimitri)\n\nPonderous(dimitri) and forall x (Ponderous(x) -> Altricial(x)) -> therefore Altricial(dimitri) Altricial(dimitri) and Ponderous(dimitri) and forall x (Altricial(x) and Ponderous(x) -> Unearned(x)) -> therefore Unearned(dimitri) Ponderous(dimitri) and forall x (Ponderous(x) -> Altricial(x)) -> therefore Altricial(dimitri) Unearned(dimitri) and Altricial(dimitri) and forall x (Unearned(x) and Altricial(x) -> Fastigiate(x)) -> therefore Fastigiate(dimitri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Kerrill is unifoliate. Elfreda is affluent. Elfreda is additional. Elfreda is capped. Elfreda is statutory. Elfreda is unifoliate. Elfreda is expositive. Elfreda is cliched. Dante is affluent. Dante is additional. Dante is capped. Dante is statutory. Dante is unifoliate. Dante is expositive. Dante is cliched. If someone is additional and expositive then they are capped. If Dante is expositive then Dante is additional. Cold, statutory people are cliched. If someone is unifoliate then they are cliched. White, unifoliate people are capped. All additional, capped people are affluent. All capped, cliched people are expositive. All affluent, expositive people are cliched. Kerrill is not affluent.", "logic": "\nUnifoliate(kerrill)\nAffluent(elfreda)\nAdditional(elfreda)\nCapped(elfreda)\nStatutory(elfreda)\nUnifoliate(elfreda)\nExpositive(elfreda)\nCliched(elfreda)\nAffluent(dante)\nAdditional(dante)\nCapped(dante)\nStatutory(dante)\nUnifoliate(dante)\nExpositive(dante)\nCliched(dante)\nforall x (Additional(x) and Expositive(x) -> Capped(x))\nExpositive(dante) -> Additional(dante)\nforall x (Capped(x) and Statutory(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) and Unifoliate(x) -> Capped(x))\nforall x (Additional(x) and Capped(x) -> Affluent(x))\nforall x (Capped(x) and Cliched(x) -> Expositive(x))\nforall x (Affluent(x) and Expositive(x) -> Cliched(x))\n\nnot Affluent(kerrill)\n\nforall x (Additional(x) and Capped(x) -> Affluent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Kristel is tireless. Baily is mistakable. Baily is perishable. Baily is demented. Baily is bengali. Baily is tireless. Baily is autotelic. Baily is exogenic. Elbertine is mistakable. Elbertine is perishable. Elbertine is demented. Elbertine is bengali. Elbertine is tireless. Elbertine is autotelic. Elbertine is exogenic. If someone is perishable and autotelic then they are demented. If Elbertine is autotelic then Elbertine is perishable. Cold, bengali people are exogenic. If someone is tireless then they are exogenic. White, tireless people are demented. All perishable, demented people are mistakable. All demented, exogenic people are autotelic. All mistakable, autotelic people are exogenic. Kristel is bengali.", "logic": "\nTireless(kristel)\nMistakable(baily)\nPerishable(baily)\nDemented(baily)\nBengali(baily)\nTireless(baily)\nAutotelic(baily)\nExogenic(baily)\nMistakable(elbertine)\nPerishable(elbertine)\nDemented(elbertine)\nBengali(elbertine)\nTireless(elbertine)\nAutotelic(elbertine)\nExogenic(elbertine)\nforall x (Perishable(x) and Autotelic(x) -> Demented(x))\nAutotelic(elbertine) -> Perishable(elbertine)\nforall x (Demented(x) and Bengali(x) -> Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Tireless(x) -> Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Tireless(x) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Perishable(x) and Demented(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Demented(x) and Exogenic(x) -> Autotelic(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) and Autotelic(x) -> Exogenic(x))\n\nBengali(kristel)\n\nBengali(kristel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1455"} {"premises": "Kari is modeled. Thaxter is slashing. Kristos is roughdried. Scottie is sunless. If something is roughdried and slashing then it is fickle. All slashing things are roughdried. Kristos is roughdried.", "logic": "\nModeled(kari)\nSlashing(thaxter)\nRoughdried(kristos)\nSunless(scottie)\nforall x (Roughdried(x) and Slashing(x) -> Fickle(x))\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Roughdried(x))\n\nRoughdried(kristos)\n\ntherefore Roughdried(kristos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Candra is pampering. Helmuth is cheerful. Devin is jingly. Halley is rightist. If something is jingly and cheerful then it is southmost. All cheerful things are jingly. Devin is not jingly.", "logic": "\nPampering(candra)\nCheerful(helmuth)\nJingly(devin)\nRightist(halley)\nforall x (Jingly(x) and Cheerful(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Cheerful(x) -> Jingly(x))\n\nnot Jingly(devin)\n\ntherefore Jingly(devin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Leiah is tallish. Deana is antecedent. Gray is stinting. Damara is limbed. If something is stinting and antecedent then it is ascending. All antecedent things are stinting. Deana is stinting.", "logic": "\nTallish(leiah)\nAntecedent(deana)\nStinting(gray)\nLimbed(damara)\nforall x (Stinting(x) and Antecedent(x) -> Ascending(x))\nforall x (Antecedent(x) -> Stinting(x))\n\nStinting(deana)\n\nAntecedent(deana) and forall x (Antecedent(x) -> Stinting(x)) -> therefore Stinting(deana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Wynny is cutaneous. Albert is sedative. Dimitry is posh. Lance is aquatic. If something is posh and sedative then it is sagittal. All sedative things are posh. Albert is not posh.", "logic": "\nCutaneous(wynny)\nSedative(albert)\nPosh(dimitry)\nAquatic(lance)\nforall x (Posh(x) and Sedative(x) -> Sagittal(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Posh(x))\n\nnot Posh(albert)\n\nSedative(albert) and forall x (Sedative(x) -> Posh(x)) -> therefore Posh(albert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Risa is geared. Lotte is tragical. Sheba is fiberoptic. Mika is bedrid. If something is fiberoptic and tragical then it is intestinal. All tragical things are fiberoptic. Lotte is intestinal.", "logic": "\nGeared(risa)\nTragical(lotte)\nFiberoptic(sheba)\nBedrid(mika)\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) and Tragical(x) -> Intestinal(x))\nforall x (Tragical(x) -> Fiberoptic(x))\n\nIntestinal(lotte)\n\nTragical(lotte) and forall x (Tragical(x) -> Fiberoptic(x)) -> therefore Fiberoptic(lotte) Fiberoptic(lotte) and Tragical(lotte) and forall x (Fiberoptic(x) and Tragical(x) -> Intestinal(x)) -> therefore Intestinal(lotte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Nicholle is pilar. Kenn is dipped. Ailina is scarlet. Nathanial is ossiferous. If something is scarlet and dipped then it is aflicker. All dipped things are scarlet. Kenn is not aflicker.", "logic": "\nPilar(nicholle)\nDipped(kenn)\nScarlet(ailina)\nOssiferous(nathanial)\nforall x (Scarlet(x) and Dipped(x) -> Aflicker(x))\nforall x (Dipped(x) -> Scarlet(x))\n\nnot Aflicker(kenn)\n\nDipped(kenn) and forall x (Dipped(x) -> Scarlet(x)) -> therefore Scarlet(kenn) Scarlet(kenn) and Dipped(kenn) and forall x (Scarlet(x) and Dipped(x) -> Aflicker(x)) -> therefore Aflicker(kenn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Lilah is doughy. Jerrold is infertile. Alice is federal. Tamarra is modern. If something is federal and infertile then it is acetose. All infertile things are federal. Alice is not acetose.", "logic": "\nDoughy(lilah)\nInfertile(jerrold)\nFederal(alice)\nModern(tamarra)\nforall x (Federal(x) and Infertile(x) -> Acetose(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) -> Federal(x))\n\nnot Acetose(alice)\n\nforall x (Federal(x) and Infertile(x) -> Acetose(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Terri is bladdery. Benetta is exogamous. Gavra is uninviting. Anette is halcyon. If something is uninviting and exogamous then it is imaginary. All exogamous things are uninviting. Terri is uninviting.", "logic": "\nBladdery(terri)\nExogamous(benetta)\nUninviting(gavra)\nHalcyon(anette)\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Exogamous(x) -> Imaginary(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) -> Uninviting(x))\n\nUninviting(terri)\n\nforall x (Exogamous(x) -> Uninviting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Kalindi is toasted. Drew is dissolved. Harmon is unblushing. Jakob is energising. If something is unblushing and dissolved then it is steamy. All dissolved things are unblushing. Kalindi is not steamy.", "logic": "\nToasted(kalindi)\nDissolved(drew)\nUnblushing(harmon)\nEnergising(jakob)\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and Dissolved(x) -> Steamy(x))\nforall x (Dissolved(x) -> Unblushing(x))\n\nnot Steamy(kalindi)\n\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and Dissolved(x) -> Steamy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Mattias is imputable. Nicolas is microsomal. Ilana is absorptive. Kinna is belittling. If something is absorptive and microsomal then it is slipshod. All microsomal things are absorptive. Kinna is big.", "logic": "\nImputable(mattias)\nMicrosomal(nicolas)\nAbsorptive(ilana)\nBelittling(kinna)\nforall x (Absorptive(x) and Microsomal(x) -> Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Absorptive(x))\n\nBig(kinna)\n\nBig(kinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Vivyan is elevated. Sharlene is amphibious. Milka is passionate. Madison is releasing. If something is passionate and amphibious then it is dickey. All amphibious things are passionate. Madison is not elevated.", "logic": "\nElevated(vivyan)\nAmphibious(sharlene)\nPassionate(milka)\nReleasing(madison)\nforall x (Passionate(x) and Amphibious(x) -> Dickey(x))\nforall x (Amphibious(x) -> Passionate(x))\n\nnot Elevated(madison)\n\nnot Elevated(madison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Harland is calceolate. Modesta is cyprian. Austin is nigerien. Sharline is iron. If something is nigerien and cyprian then it is cattish. All cyprian things are nigerien. Modesta is calceolate.", "logic": "\nCalceolate(harland)\nCyprian(modesta)\nNigerien(austin)\nIron(sharline)\nforall x (Nigerien(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Cattish(x))\nforall x (Cyprian(x) -> Nigerien(x))\n\nCalceolate(modesta)\n\nCalceolate(modesta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1054"} {"premises": "Caron is festive. Nat is clubby. Florance is clubby. If something is nescient then it is pasted. All pasted things are shrill. If something is clubby then it is shrill. Big, festive things are nescient. Rough things are struggling. If something is festive then it is unburied. If something is unburied then it is shrill. If Nat is unburied then Nat is festive. Caron is festive.", "logic": "\nFestive(caron)\nClubby(nat)\nClubby(florance)\nforall x (Nescient(x) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Pasted(x) -> Shrill(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> Shrill(x))\nforall x (Clubby(x) and Festive(x) -> Nescient(x))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Struggling(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Unburied(x))\nforall x (Unburied(x) -> Shrill(x))\nUnburied(nat) -> Festive(nat)\n\nFestive(caron)\n\ntherefore Festive(caron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Kassi is ingrowing. Katalin is periodic. Mathew is periodic. If something is raftered then it is diamantine. All diamantine things are categoric. If something is periodic then it is categoric. Big, ingrowing things are raftered. Rough things are cephalic. If something is ingrowing then it is ossiculate. If something is ossiculate then it is categoric. If Katalin is ossiculate then Katalin is ingrowing. Kassi is not ingrowing.", "logic": "\nIngrowing(kassi)\nPeriodic(katalin)\nPeriodic(mathew)\nforall x (Raftered(x) -> Diamantine(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) -> Categoric(x))\nforall x (Periodic(x) -> Categoric(x))\nforall x (Periodic(x) and Ingrowing(x) -> Raftered(x))\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Ingrowing(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Categoric(x))\nOssiculate(katalin) -> Ingrowing(katalin)\n\nnot Ingrowing(kassi)\n\ntherefore Ingrowing(kassi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Feodora is gingival. Aimil is stranded. Darline is stranded. If something is unaired then it is rubbery. All rubbery things are raised. If something is stranded then it is raised. Big, gingival things are unaired. Rough things are necklike. If something is gingival then it is spouting. If something is spouting then it is raised. If Aimil is spouting then Aimil is gingival. Darline is raised.", "logic": "\nGingival(feodora)\nStranded(aimil)\nStranded(darline)\nforall x (Unaired(x) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Rubbery(x) -> Raised(x))\nforall x (Stranded(x) -> Raised(x))\nforall x (Stranded(x) and Gingival(x) -> Unaired(x))\nforall x (Raised(x) -> Necklike(x))\nforall x (Gingival(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Raised(x))\nSpouting(aimil) -> Gingival(aimil)\n\nRaised(darline)\n\nStranded(darline) and forall x (Stranded(x) -> Raised(x)) -> therefore Raised(darline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Avie is exalted. Karlee is murmuring. Gwendolyn is murmuring. If something is medium then it is milkless. All milkless things are polygonal. If something is murmuring then it is polygonal. Big, exalted things are medium. Rough things are marginal. If something is exalted then it is unary. If something is unary then it is polygonal. If Karlee is unary then Karlee is exalted. Karlee is not polygonal.", "logic": "\nExalted(avie)\nMurmuring(karlee)\nMurmuring(gwendolyn)\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Milkless(x))\nforall x (Milkless(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) and Exalted(x) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Polygonal(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> Unary(x))\nforall x (Unary(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nUnary(karlee) -> Exalted(karlee)\n\nnot Polygonal(karlee)\n\nMurmuring(karlee) and forall x (Murmuring(x) -> Polygonal(x)) -> therefore Polygonal(karlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Simonne is tallish. Serge is prosperous. Chrissy is prosperous. If something is georgian then it is viscid. All viscid things are mutual. If something is prosperous then it is mutual. Big, tallish things are georgian. Rough things are yelled. If something is tallish then it is apneic. If something is apneic then it is mutual. If Serge is apneic then Serge is tallish. Chrissy is yelled.", "logic": "\nTallish(simonne)\nProsperous(serge)\nProsperous(chrissy)\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Viscid(x))\nforall x (Viscid(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Prosperous(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Prosperous(x) and Tallish(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Mutual(x) -> Yelled(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Apneic(x))\nforall x (Apneic(x) -> Mutual(x))\nApneic(serge) -> Tallish(serge)\n\nYelled(chrissy)\n\nProsperous(chrissy) and forall x (Prosperous(x) -> Mutual(x)) -> therefore Mutual(chrissy) Mutual(chrissy) and forall x (Mutual(x) -> Yelled(x)) -> therefore Yelled(chrissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Lenore is unsaid. Lorrin is analogous. Albertine is analogous. If something is verrucose then it is striking. All striking things are justified. If something is analogous then it is justified. Big, unsaid things are verrucose. Rough things are gonzo. If something is unsaid then it is slav. If something is slav then it is justified. If Lorrin is slav then Lorrin is unsaid. Lenore is not justified.", "logic": "\nUnsaid(lenore)\nAnalogous(lorrin)\nAnalogous(albertine)\nforall x (Verrucose(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) -> Justified(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) -> Justified(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) and Unsaid(x) -> Verrucose(x))\nforall x (Justified(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Slav(x))\nforall x (Slav(x) -> Justified(x))\nSlav(lorrin) -> Unsaid(lorrin)\n\nnot Justified(lenore)\n\nUnsaid(lenore) and forall x (Unsaid(x) -> Slav(x)) -> therefore Slav(lenore) Slav(lenore) and forall x (Slav(x) -> Justified(x)) -> therefore Justified(lenore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Kaspar is inclement. Bebe is playful. Bertram is playful. If something is hormonal then it is forward. All forward things are ensuing. If something is playful then it is ensuing. Big, inclement things are hormonal. Rough things are prepaid. If something is inclement then it is unturned. If something is unturned then it is ensuing. If Bebe is unturned then Bebe is inclement. Kaspar is prepaid.", "logic": "\nInclement(kaspar)\nPlayful(bebe)\nPlayful(bertram)\nforall x (Hormonal(x) -> Forward(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) -> Ensuing(x))\nforall x (Playful(x) -> Ensuing(x))\nforall x (Playful(x) and Inclement(x) -> Hormonal(x))\nforall x (Ensuing(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Inclement(x) -> Unturned(x))\nforall x (Unturned(x) -> Ensuing(x))\nUnturned(bebe) -> Inclement(bebe)\n\nPrepaid(kaspar)\n\nInclement(kaspar) and forall x (Inclement(x) -> Unturned(x)) -> therefore Unturned(kaspar) Unturned(kaspar) and forall x (Unturned(x) -> Ensuing(x)) -> therefore Ensuing(kaspar) Ensuing(kaspar) and forall x (Ensuing(x) -> Prepaid(x)) -> therefore Prepaid(kaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Trev is modernised. Esta is pianissimo. Mary is pianissimo. If something is ramate then it is unaerated. All unaerated things are phagocytic. If something is pianissimo then it is phagocytic. Big, modernised things are ramate. Rough things are ascending. If something is modernised then it is elapsed. If something is elapsed then it is phagocytic. If Esta is elapsed then Esta is modernised. Trev is not ascending.", "logic": "\nModernised(trev)\nPianissimo(esta)\nPianissimo(mary)\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> Unaerated(x))\nforall x (Unaerated(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) and Modernised(x) -> Ramate(x))\nforall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Ascending(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> Elapsed(x))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) -> Phagocytic(x))\nElapsed(esta) -> Modernised(esta)\n\nnot Ascending(trev)\n\nModernised(trev) and forall x (Modernised(x) -> Elapsed(x)) -> therefore Elapsed(trev) Elapsed(trev) and forall x (Elapsed(x) -> Phagocytic(x)) -> therefore Phagocytic(trev) Phagocytic(trev) and forall x (Phagocytic(x) -> Ascending(x)) -> therefore Ascending(trev)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Thor is iatrogenic. Dov is eonian. Kessia is eonian. If something is yankee then it is quaternate. All quaternate things are conical. If something is eonian then it is conical. Big, iatrogenic things are yankee. Rough things are moonless. If something is iatrogenic then it is bothersome. If something is bothersome then it is conical. If Dov is bothersome then Dov is iatrogenic. Dov is not bothersome.", "logic": "\nIatrogenic(thor)\nEonian(dov)\nEonian(kessia)\nforall x (Yankee(x) -> Quaternate(x))\nforall x (Quaternate(x) -> Conical(x))\nforall x (Eonian(x) -> Conical(x))\nforall x (Eonian(x) and Iatrogenic(x) -> Yankee(x))\nforall x (Conical(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) -> Conical(x))\nBothersome(dov) -> Iatrogenic(dov)\n\nnot Bothersome(dov)\n\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Bothersome(x)) <- Bothersome(dov) -> Iatrogenic(dov) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Sonni is efferent. Kori is juiceless. Inga is juiceless. If something is debonair then it is descendent. All descendent things are fearsome. If something is juiceless then it is fearsome. Big, efferent things are debonair. Rough things are ungathered. If something is efferent then it is spinous. If something is spinous then it is fearsome. If Kori is spinous then Kori is efferent. Sonni is descendent.", "logic": "\nEfferent(sonni)\nJuiceless(kori)\nJuiceless(inga)\nforall x (Debonair(x) -> Descendent(x))\nforall x (Descendent(x) -> Fearsome(x))\nforall x (Juiceless(x) -> Fearsome(x))\nforall x (Juiceless(x) and Efferent(x) -> Debonair(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Ungathered(x))\nforall x (Efferent(x) -> Spinous(x))\nforall x (Spinous(x) -> Fearsome(x))\nSpinous(kori) -> Efferent(kori)\n\nDescendent(sonni)\n\nforall x (Debonair(x) -> Descendent(x)) <- forall x (Juiceless(x) and Efferent(x) -> Debonair(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Emmery is pampering. Gianna is bolshevik. Robinet is bolshevik. If something is noetic then it is retentive. All retentive things are readable. If something is bolshevik then it is readable. Big, pampering things are noetic. Rough things are polygonal. If something is pampering then it is slim. If something is slim then it is readable. If Gianna is slim then Gianna is pampering. Gianna is not pampering.", "logic": "\nPampering(emmery)\nBolshevik(gianna)\nBolshevik(robinet)\nforall x (Noetic(x) -> Retentive(x))\nforall x (Retentive(x) -> Readable(x))\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) -> Readable(x))\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) and Pampering(x) -> Noetic(x))\nforall x (Readable(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Pampering(x) -> Slim(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Readable(x))\nSlim(gianna) -> Pampering(gianna)\n\nnot Pampering(gianna)\n\nSlim(gianna) -> Pampering(gianna) <- forall x (Pampering(x) -> Slim(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Binnie is ongoing. Stace is apophatic. Leese is apophatic. If something is desiccate then it is holozoic. All holozoic things are circinate. If something is apophatic then it is circinate. Big, ongoing things are desiccate. Rough things are microbial. If something is ongoing then it is stative. If something is stative then it is circinate. If Stace is stative then Stace is ongoing. Leese is desiccate.", "logic": "\nOngoing(binnie)\nApophatic(stace)\nApophatic(leese)\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Circinate(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Circinate(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) and Ongoing(x) -> Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Circinate(x) -> Microbial(x))\nforall x (Ongoing(x) -> Stative(x))\nforall x (Stative(x) -> Circinate(x))\nStative(stace) -> Ongoing(stace)\n\nDesiccate(leese)\n\nforall x (Apophatic(x) and Ongoing(x) -> Desiccate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Abram is equitable. Blaine is alkaloidal. Dorri is alkaloidal. If something is appareled then it is laryngeal. All laryngeal things are georgian. If something is alkaloidal then it is georgian. Big, equitable things are appareled. Rough things are laughing. If something is equitable then it is pelvic. If something is pelvic then it is georgian. If Blaine is pelvic then Blaine is equitable. Dorri is not equitable.", "logic": "\nEquitable(abram)\nAlkaloidal(blaine)\nAlkaloidal(dorri)\nforall x (Appareled(x) -> Laryngeal(x))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Alkaloidal(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Alkaloidal(x) and Equitable(x) -> Appareled(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Laughing(x))\nforall x (Equitable(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Pelvic(x) -> Georgian(x))\nPelvic(blaine) -> Equitable(blaine)\n\nnot Equitable(dorri)\n\nnot Equitable(dorri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Benedicta is enzymatic. Fallon is effluent. Corri is effluent. If something is stunted then it is epithelial. All epithelial things are whacked. If something is effluent then it is whacked. Big, enzymatic things are stunted. Rough things are union. If something is enzymatic then it is rentable. If something is rentable then it is whacked. If Fallon is rentable then Fallon is enzymatic. Benedicta is effluent.", "logic": "\nEnzymatic(benedicta)\nEffluent(fallon)\nEffluent(corri)\nforall x (Stunted(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> Whacked(x))\nforall x (Effluent(x) -> Whacked(x))\nforall x (Effluent(x) and Enzymatic(x) -> Stunted(x))\nforall x (Whacked(x) -> Union(x))\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Rentable(x))\nforall x (Rentable(x) -> Whacked(x))\nRentable(fallon) -> Enzymatic(fallon)\n\nEffluent(benedicta)\n\nEffluent(benedicta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1705"} {"premises": "Hilda is dusky. Hilda is flowered. Hilda is addlepated. All synclinal, schizoid people are flowered. All devotional, optic people are schizoid. If someone is synclinal then they are flowered. Big, schizoid people are optic. If Hilda is dusky then Hilda is schizoid. Furry, synclinal people are optic. White people are synclinal. All optic, schizoid people are addlepated. Hilda is flowered.", "logic": "\nDusky(hilda)\nFlowered(hilda)\nAddlepated(hilda)\nforall x (Synclinal(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Devotional(x) and Optic(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nforall x (Synclinal(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Synclinal(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Optic(x))\nDusky(hilda) -> Schizoid(hilda)\nforall x (Devotional(x) and Synclinal(x) -> Optic(x))\nforall x (Schizoid(x) -> Synclinal(x))\nforall x (Optic(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Addlepated(x))\n\nFlowered(hilda)\n\ntherefore Flowered(hilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Perrine is airless. Perrine is skintight. Perrine is tactless. All confounded, libyan people are skintight. All computable, ictic people are libyan. If someone is confounded then they are skintight. Big, libyan people are ictic. If Perrine is airless then Perrine is libyan. Furry, confounded people are ictic. White people are confounded. All ictic, libyan people are tactless. Perrine is not airless.", "logic": "\nAirless(perrine)\nSkintight(perrine)\nTactless(perrine)\nforall x (Confounded(x) and Libyan(x) -> Skintight(x))\nforall x (Computable(x) and Ictic(x) -> Libyan(x))\nforall x (Confounded(x) -> Skintight(x))\nforall x (Confounded(x) and Libyan(x) -> Ictic(x))\nAirless(perrine) -> Libyan(perrine)\nforall x (Computable(x) and Confounded(x) -> Ictic(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) -> Confounded(x))\nforall x (Ictic(x) and Libyan(x) -> Tactless(x))\n\nnot Airless(perrine)\n\ntherefore Airless(perrine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Arlina is ideologic. Arlina is bacchic. Arlina is painted. All shouldered, phocine people are bacchic. All falling, inwrought people are phocine. If someone is shouldered then they are bacchic. Big, phocine people are inwrought. If Arlina is ideologic then Arlina is phocine. Furry, shouldered people are inwrought. White people are shouldered. All inwrought, phocine people are painted. Arlina is phocine.", "logic": "\nIdeologic(arlina)\nBacchic(arlina)\nPainted(arlina)\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Phocine(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Falling(x) and Inwrought(x) -> Phocine(x))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Phocine(x) -> Inwrought(x))\nIdeologic(arlina) -> Phocine(arlina)\nforall x (Falling(x) and Shouldered(x) -> Inwrought(x))\nforall x (Phocine(x) -> Shouldered(x))\nforall x (Inwrought(x) and Phocine(x) -> Painted(x))\n\nPhocine(arlina)\n\nIdeologic(arlina) and Ideologic(arlina) -> Phocine(arlina) -> therefore Phocine(arlina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Deina is dickensian. Deina is penetrable. Deina is incessant. All peppery, orangish people are penetrable. All recurvate, verminous people are orangish. If someone is peppery then they are penetrable. Big, orangish people are verminous. If Deina is dickensian then Deina is orangish. Furry, peppery people are verminous. White people are peppery. All verminous, orangish people are incessant. Deina is not orangish.", "logic": "\nDickensian(deina)\nPenetrable(deina)\nIncessant(deina)\nforall x (Peppery(x) and Orangish(x) -> Penetrable(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and Verminous(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Peppery(x) -> Penetrable(x))\nforall x (Peppery(x) and Orangish(x) -> Verminous(x))\nDickensian(deina) -> Orangish(deina)\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and Peppery(x) -> Verminous(x))\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Peppery(x))\nforall x (Verminous(x) and Orangish(x) -> Incessant(x))\n\nnot Orangish(deina)\n\nDickensian(deina) and Dickensian(deina) -> Orangish(deina) -> therefore Orangish(deina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Ware is syrian. Ware is cathedral. Ware is lipped. All boundless, fanned people are cathedral. All cheery, pricey people are fanned. If someone is boundless then they are cathedral. Big, fanned people are pricey. If Ware is syrian then Ware is fanned. Furry, boundless people are pricey. White people are boundless. All pricey, fanned people are lipped. Ware is boundless.", "logic": "\nSyrian(ware)\nCathedral(ware)\nLipped(ware)\nforall x (Boundless(x) and Fanned(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Cheery(x) and Pricey(x) -> Fanned(x))\nforall x (Boundless(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Boundless(x) and Fanned(x) -> Pricey(x))\nSyrian(ware) -> Fanned(ware)\nforall x (Cheery(x) and Boundless(x) -> Pricey(x))\nforall x (Fanned(x) -> Boundless(x))\nforall x (Pricey(x) and Fanned(x) -> Lipped(x))\n\nBoundless(ware)\n\nSyrian(ware) and Syrian(ware) -> Fanned(ware) -> therefore Fanned(ware) Fanned(ware) and forall x (Fanned(x) -> Boundless(x)) -> therefore Boundless(ware)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Jude is undecided. Jude is voluble. Jude is psychotic. All carboxyl, covariant people are voluble. All rustic, scarce people are covariant. If someone is carboxyl then they are voluble. Big, covariant people are scarce. If Jude is undecided then Jude is covariant. Furry, carboxyl people are scarce. White people are carboxyl. All scarce, covariant people are psychotic. Jude is not carboxyl.", "logic": "\nUndecided(jude)\nVoluble(jude)\nPsychotic(jude)\nforall x (Carboxyl(x) and Covariant(x) -> Voluble(x))\nforall x (Rustic(x) and Scarce(x) -> Covariant(x))\nforall x (Carboxyl(x) -> Voluble(x))\nforall x (Carboxyl(x) and Covariant(x) -> Scarce(x))\nUndecided(jude) -> Covariant(jude)\nforall x (Rustic(x) and Carboxyl(x) -> Scarce(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Scarce(x) and Covariant(x) -> Psychotic(x))\n\nnot Carboxyl(jude)\n\nUndecided(jude) and Undecided(jude) -> Covariant(jude) -> therefore Covariant(jude) Covariant(jude) and forall x (Covariant(x) -> Carboxyl(x)) -> therefore Carboxyl(jude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Gabbey is endoergic. Gabbey is quickset. Gabbey is treasured. All ungallant, flip people are quickset. All regulative, milch people are flip. If someone is ungallant then they are quickset. Big, flip people are milch. If Gabbey is endoergic then Gabbey is flip. Furry, ungallant people are milch. White people are ungallant. All milch, flip people are treasured. Gabbey is milch.", "logic": "\nEndoergic(gabbey)\nQuickset(gabbey)\nTreasured(gabbey)\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Flip(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Regulative(x) and Milch(x) -> Flip(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Flip(x) -> Milch(x))\nEndoergic(gabbey) -> Flip(gabbey)\nforall x (Regulative(x) and Ungallant(x) -> Milch(x))\nforall x (Flip(x) -> Ungallant(x))\nforall x (Milch(x) and Flip(x) -> Treasured(x))\n\nMilch(gabbey)\n\nEndoergic(gabbey) and Endoergic(gabbey) -> Flip(gabbey) -> therefore Flip(gabbey) Flip(gabbey) and forall x (Flip(x) -> Ungallant(x)) -> therefore Ungallant(gabbey) Endoergic(gabbey) and Endoergic(gabbey) -> Flip(gabbey) -> therefore Flip(gabbey) Ungallant(gabbey) and Flip(gabbey) and forall x (Ungallant(x) and Flip(x) -> Milch(x)) -> therefore Milch(gabbey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Angela is volunteer. Angela is satiated. Angela is desired. All after, viable people are satiated. All ototoxic, bawdy people are viable. If someone is after then they are satiated. Big, viable people are bawdy. If Angela is volunteer then Angela is viable. Furry, after people are bawdy. White people are after. All bawdy, viable people are desired. Angela is not bawdy.", "logic": "\nVolunteer(angela)\nSatiated(angela)\nDesired(angela)\nforall x (After(x) and Viable(x) -> Satiated(x))\nforall x (Ototoxic(x) and Bawdy(x) -> Viable(x))\nforall x (After(x) -> Satiated(x))\nforall x (After(x) and Viable(x) -> Bawdy(x))\nVolunteer(angela) -> Viable(angela)\nforall x (Ototoxic(x) and After(x) -> Bawdy(x))\nforall x (Viable(x) -> After(x))\nforall x (Bawdy(x) and Viable(x) -> Desired(x))\n\nnot Bawdy(angela)\n\nVolunteer(angela) and Volunteer(angela) -> Viable(angela) -> therefore Viable(angela) Viable(angela) and forall x (Viable(x) -> After(x)) -> therefore After(angela) Volunteer(angela) and Volunteer(angela) -> Viable(angela) -> therefore Viable(angela) After(angela) and Viable(angela) and forall x (After(x) and Viable(x) -> Bawdy(x)) -> therefore Bawdy(angela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-96"} {"premises": "Diana is express. Winna is alert. Jenn is metacarpal. Johnette is weightless. All alert, metacarpal people are amoebic. If Winna is express and Winna is not weightless then Winna is not sloped. If someone is alert then they are metacarpal. If someone is weightless then they are alert. All alert people are expiatory. If someone is alert then they are not sloped. Johnette is weightless.", "logic": "\nExpress(diana)\nAlert(winna)\nMetacarpal(jenn)\nWeightless(johnette)\nforall x (Alert(x) and Metacarpal(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nExpress(winna) and not Weightless(winna) -> not Sloped(winna)\nforall x (Alert(x) -> Metacarpal(x))\nforall x (Weightless(x) -> Alert(x))\nforall x (Alert(x) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Alert(x) -> not Sloped(x))\n\nWeightless(johnette)\n\ntherefore Weightless(johnette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Annalyse is woody. Maison is cypriote. Elroy is mandibular. Stig is symmetric. All cypriote, mandibular people are medicative. If Maison is woody and Maison is not symmetric then Maison is not onside. If someone is cypriote then they are mandibular. If someone is symmetric then they are cypriote. All cypriote people are buckshee. If someone is cypriote then they are not onside. Elroy is not mandibular.", "logic": "\nWoody(annalyse)\nCypriote(maison)\nMandibular(elroy)\nSymmetric(stig)\nforall x (Cypriote(x) and Mandibular(x) -> Medicative(x))\nWoody(maison) and not Symmetric(maison) -> not Onside(maison)\nforall x (Cypriote(x) -> Mandibular(x))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Cypriote(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) -> not Onside(x))\n\nnot Mandibular(elroy)\n\ntherefore Mandibular(elroy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Roddy is worried. Corby is flukey. Lishe is baritone. Kaleb is calycular. All flukey, baritone people are oncoming. If Corby is worried and Corby is not calycular then Corby is not bantam. If someone is flukey then they are baritone. If someone is calycular then they are flukey. All flukey people are unmatched. If someone is flukey then they are not bantam. Kaleb is flukey.", "logic": "\nWorried(roddy)\nFlukey(corby)\nBaritone(lishe)\nCalycular(kaleb)\nforall x (Flukey(x) and Baritone(x) -> Oncoming(x))\nWorried(corby) and not Calycular(corby) -> not Bantam(corby)\nforall x (Flukey(x) -> Baritone(x))\nforall x (Calycular(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Flukey(x) -> Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Flukey(x) -> not Bantam(x))\n\nFlukey(kaleb)\n\nCalycular(kaleb) and forall x (Calycular(x) -> Flukey(x)) -> therefore Flukey(kaleb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Veronike is xlvii. Seka is freakish. Allyn is tainted. Rivalee is shuddering. All freakish, tainted people are actinoid. If Seka is xlvii and Seka is not shuddering then Seka is not tyrannic. If someone is freakish then they are tainted. If someone is shuddering then they are freakish. All freakish people are bilocular. If someone is freakish then they are not tyrannic. Rivalee is not freakish.", "logic": "\nXlvii(veronike)\nFreakish(seka)\nTainted(allyn)\nShuddering(rivalee)\nforall x (Freakish(x) and Tainted(x) -> Actinoid(x))\nXlvii(seka) and not Shuddering(seka) -> not Tyrannic(seka)\nforall x (Freakish(x) -> Tainted(x))\nforall x (Shuddering(x) -> Freakish(x))\nforall x (Freakish(x) -> Bilocular(x))\nforall x (Freakish(x) -> not Tyrannic(x))\n\nnot Freakish(rivalee)\n\nShuddering(rivalee) and forall x (Shuddering(x) -> Freakish(x)) -> therefore Freakish(rivalee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Philomena is prostrate. Dimitris is cauline. Carola is genealogic. Trula is dreamed. All cauline, genealogic people are steady. If Dimitris is prostrate and Dimitris is not dreamed then Dimitris is not priapic. If someone is cauline then they are genealogic. If someone is dreamed then they are cauline. All cauline people are major. If someone is cauline then they are not priapic. Trula is genealogic.", "logic": "\nProstrate(philomena)\nCauline(dimitris)\nGenealogic(carola)\nDreamed(trula)\nforall x (Cauline(x) and Genealogic(x) -> Steady(x))\nProstrate(dimitris) and not Dreamed(dimitris) -> not Priapic(dimitris)\nforall x (Cauline(x) -> Genealogic(x))\nforall x (Dreamed(x) -> Cauline(x))\nforall x (Cauline(x) -> Major(x))\nforall x (Cauline(x) -> not Priapic(x))\n\nGenealogic(trula)\n\nDreamed(trula) and forall x (Dreamed(x) -> Cauline(x)) -> therefore Cauline(trula) Cauline(trula) and forall x (Cauline(x) -> Genealogic(x)) -> therefore Genealogic(trula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Yonina is guileless. Stanford is null. Anatoly is caulked. Barn is keyed. All null, caulked people are hairless. If Stanford is guileless and Stanford is not keyed then Stanford is not expansile. If someone is null then they are caulked. If someone is keyed then they are null. All null people are bathetic. If someone is null then they are not expansile. Stanford is not hairless.", "logic": "\nGuileless(yonina)\nNull(stanford)\nCaulked(anatoly)\nKeyed(barn)\nforall x (Null(x) and Caulked(x) -> Hairless(x))\nGuileless(stanford) and not Keyed(stanford) -> not Expansile(stanford)\nforall x (Null(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Null(x))\nforall x (Null(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Null(x) -> not Expansile(x))\n\nnot Hairless(stanford)\n\nNull(stanford) and forall x (Null(x) -> Caulked(x)) -> therefore Caulked(stanford) Null(stanford) and Caulked(stanford) and forall x (Null(x) and Caulked(x) -> Hairless(x)) -> therefore Hairless(stanford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Erhart is bawdy. Tabor is imprudent. Mercy is liked. Josi is upstart. All imprudent, liked people are situated. If Tabor is bawdy and Tabor is not upstart then Tabor is not cosmogonic. If someone is imprudent then they are liked. If someone is upstart then they are imprudent. All imprudent people are noteworthy. If someone is imprudent then they are not cosmogonic. Josi is situated.", "logic": "\nBawdy(erhart)\nImprudent(tabor)\nLiked(mercy)\nUpstart(josi)\nforall x (Imprudent(x) and Liked(x) -> Situated(x))\nBawdy(tabor) and not Upstart(tabor) -> not Cosmogonic(tabor)\nforall x (Imprudent(x) -> Liked(x))\nforall x (Upstart(x) -> Imprudent(x))\nforall x (Imprudent(x) -> Noteworthy(x))\nforall x (Imprudent(x) -> not Cosmogonic(x))\n\nSituated(josi)\n\nUpstart(josi) and forall x (Upstart(x) -> Imprudent(x)) -> therefore Imprudent(josi) Upstart(josi) and forall x (Upstart(x) -> Imprudent(x)) -> therefore Imprudent(josi) Imprudent(josi) and forall x (Imprudent(x) -> Liked(x)) -> therefore Liked(josi) Imprudent(josi) and Liked(josi) and forall x (Imprudent(x) and Liked(x) -> Situated(x)) -> therefore Situated(josi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Roy is odorless. Bernadina is dispersive. Colline is heuristic. Tiffany is fresh. All dispersive, heuristic people are nonsense. If Bernadina is odorless and Bernadina is not fresh then Bernadina is not scratchy. If someone is dispersive then they are heuristic. If someone is fresh then they are dispersive. All dispersive people are hybrid. If someone is dispersive then they are not scratchy. Tiffany is not nonsense.", "logic": "\nOdorless(roy)\nDispersive(bernadina)\nHeuristic(colline)\nFresh(tiffany)\nforall x (Dispersive(x) and Heuristic(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nOdorless(bernadina) and not Fresh(bernadina) -> not Scratchy(bernadina)\nforall x (Dispersive(x) -> Heuristic(x))\nforall x (Fresh(x) -> Dispersive(x))\nforall x (Dispersive(x) -> Hybrid(x))\nforall x (Dispersive(x) -> not Scratchy(x))\n\nnot Nonsense(tiffany)\n\nFresh(tiffany) and forall x (Fresh(x) -> Dispersive(x)) -> therefore Dispersive(tiffany) Fresh(tiffany) and forall x (Fresh(x) -> Dispersive(x)) -> therefore Dispersive(tiffany) Dispersive(tiffany) and forall x (Dispersive(x) -> Heuristic(x)) -> therefore Heuristic(tiffany) Dispersive(tiffany) and Heuristic(tiffany) and forall x (Dispersive(x) and Heuristic(x) -> Nonsense(x)) -> therefore Nonsense(tiffany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Hallam is corky. Catlin is lonesome. Neron is evasive. Tharen is doughy. All lonesome, evasive people are panoptic. If Catlin is corky and Catlin is not doughy then Catlin is not rubicund. If someone is lonesome then they are evasive. If someone is doughy then they are lonesome. All lonesome people are warty. If someone is lonesome then they are not rubicund. Neron is not lonesome.", "logic": "\nCorky(hallam)\nLonesome(catlin)\nEvasive(neron)\nDoughy(tharen)\nforall x (Lonesome(x) and Evasive(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nCorky(catlin) and not Doughy(catlin) -> not Rubicund(catlin)\nforall x (Lonesome(x) -> Evasive(x))\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Lonesome(x))\nforall x (Lonesome(x) -> Warty(x))\nforall x (Lonesome(x) -> not Rubicund(x))\n\nnot Lonesome(neron)\n\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Lonesome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Northrup is unsaved. Alysa is overripe. Millisent is vaporish. Bobbette is unproven. All overripe, vaporish people are appraising. If Alysa is unsaved and Alysa is not unproven then Alysa is not blended. If someone is overripe then they are vaporish. If someone is unproven then they are overripe. All overripe people are loutish. If someone is overripe then they are not blended. Millisent is appraising.", "logic": "\nUnsaved(northrup)\nOverripe(alysa)\nVaporish(millisent)\nUnproven(bobbette)\nforall x (Overripe(x) and Vaporish(x) -> Appraising(x))\nUnsaved(alysa) and not Unproven(alysa) -> not Blended(alysa)\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Overripe(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Loutish(x))\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> not Blended(x))\n\nAppraising(millisent)\n\nforall x (Overripe(x) and Vaporish(x) -> Appraising(x)) <- forall x (Unproven(x) -> Overripe(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Carlisle is filipino. Guy is incisive. Candie is keyless. Esau is surreal. All incisive, keyless people are foxy. If Guy is filipino and Guy is not surreal then Guy is not radiating. If someone is incisive then they are keyless. If someone is surreal then they are incisive. All incisive people are transitory. If someone is incisive then they are not radiating. Carlisle is not incisive.", "logic": "\nFilipino(carlisle)\nIncisive(guy)\nKeyless(candie)\nSurreal(esau)\nforall x (Incisive(x) and Keyless(x) -> Foxy(x))\nFilipino(guy) and not Surreal(guy) -> not Radiating(guy)\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Keyless(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Incisive(x))\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> not Radiating(x))\n\nnot Incisive(carlisle)\n\nforall x (Surreal(x) -> Incisive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Allan is equipoised. Loralie is panicked. Jaquelyn is cautious. Maxwell is boric. All panicked, cautious people are encircling. If Loralie is equipoised and Loralie is not boric then Loralie is not blessed. If someone is panicked then they are cautious. If someone is boric then they are panicked. All panicked people are autogenic. If someone is panicked then they are not blessed. Allan is autogenic.", "logic": "\nEquipoised(allan)\nPanicked(loralie)\nCautious(jaquelyn)\nBoric(maxwell)\nforall x (Panicked(x) and Cautious(x) -> Encircling(x))\nEquipoised(loralie) and not Boric(loralie) -> not Blessed(loralie)\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Cautious(x))\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Panicked(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Autogenic(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> not Blessed(x))\n\nAutogenic(allan)\n\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Autogenic(x)) <- forall x (Boric(x) -> Panicked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Joly is unbeatable. Neddy is nosey. Casey is knowing. Kalli is stilly. All nosey, knowing people are uxorial. If Neddy is unbeatable and Neddy is not stilly then Neddy is not satisfying. If someone is nosey then they are knowing. If someone is stilly then they are nosey. All nosey people are penitent. If someone is nosey then they are not satisfying. Casey is not stilly.", "logic": "\nUnbeatable(joly)\nNosey(neddy)\nKnowing(casey)\nStilly(kalli)\nforall x (Nosey(x) and Knowing(x) -> Uxorial(x))\nUnbeatable(neddy) and not Stilly(neddy) -> not Satisfying(neddy)\nforall x (Nosey(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Stilly(x) -> Nosey(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) -> not Satisfying(x))\n\nnot Stilly(casey)\n\nnot Stilly(casey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Bernardo is vicarial. Marni is spiky. Wood is monoploid. Allah is lame. All spiky, monoploid people are unfathomed. If Marni is vicarial and Marni is not lame then Marni is not teenage. If someone is spiky then they are monoploid. If someone is lame then they are spiky. All spiky people are tameable. If someone is spiky then they are not teenage. Bernardo is lame.", "logic": "\nVicarial(bernardo)\nSpiky(marni)\nMonoploid(wood)\nLame(allah)\nforall x (Spiky(x) and Monoploid(x) -> Unfathomed(x))\nVicarial(marni) and not Lame(marni) -> not Teenage(marni)\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> Monoploid(x))\nforall x (Lame(x) -> Spiky(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> Tameable(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> not Teenage(x))\n\nLame(bernardo)\n\nLame(bernardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Fox is handheld. Norina is chelate. Ludwig is highflying. Phedra is outspread. All chelate, highflying people are cancellate. If Norina is handheld and Norina is not outspread then Norina is not egregious. If someone is chelate then they are highflying. If someone is outspread then they are chelate. All chelate people are appetent. If someone is chelate then they are not egregious. Fox is not egregious.", "logic": "\nHandheld(fox)\nChelate(norina)\nHighflying(ludwig)\nOutspread(phedra)\nforall x (Chelate(x) and Highflying(x) -> Cancellate(x))\nHandheld(norina) and not Outspread(norina) -> not Egregious(norina)\nforall x (Chelate(x) -> Highflying(x))\nforall x (Outspread(x) -> Chelate(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x) -> Appetent(x))\nforall x (Chelate(x) -> not Egregious(x))\n\nnot Egregious(fox)\n\nnot Egregious(fox) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "Lancelot is parametric. Haskel is spumy. Melvyn is errant. Tobe is foldaway. All spumy, errant people are paralyzed. If Haskel is parametric and Haskel is not foldaway then Haskel is not crooked. If someone is spumy then they are errant. If someone is foldaway then they are spumy. All spumy people are coexisting. If someone is spumy then they are not crooked. Melvyn is crooked.", "logic": "\nParametric(lancelot)\nSpumy(haskel)\nErrant(melvyn)\nFoldaway(tobe)\nforall x (Spumy(x) and Errant(x) -> Paralyzed(x))\nParametric(haskel) and not Foldaway(haskel) -> not Crooked(haskel)\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> Errant(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Spumy(x))\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> not Crooked(x))\n\nCrooked(melvyn)\n\nCrooked(melvyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1252"} {"premises": "The filide duplicate the lou. The filide is seaward. The filide is unsexed. The filide canoe the lou. The lou is unsexed. The lou canoe the filide. The lou regroup the filide. If someone duplicate the filide and they chase the lou then the lou regroup the filide. The filide canoe the lou.", "logic": "\nDuplicate(filide, lou)\nSeaward(filide)\nUnsexed(filide)\nCanoe(filide, lou)\nUnsexed(lou)\nCanoe(lou, filide)\nRegroup(lou, filide)\nforall x (Duplicate(x, filide) and Duplicate(x, lou) -> Regroup(lou, filide))\n\nCanoe(filide, lou)\n\ntherefore Canoe(filide, lou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5297"} {"premises": "The ginni broker the olivette. The ginni is pale. The ginni is advertised. The ginni simulate the olivette. The olivette is advertised. The olivette simulate the ginni. The olivette thumb the ginni. If someone broker the ginni and they chase the olivette then the olivette thumb the ginni. The ginni is not advertised.", "logic": "\nBroker(ginni, olivette)\nPale(ginni)\nAdvertised(ginni)\nSimulate(ginni, olivette)\nAdvertised(olivette)\nSimulate(olivette, ginni)\nThumb(olivette, ginni)\nforall x (Broker(x, ginni) and Broker(x, olivette) -> Thumb(olivette, ginni))\n\nnot Advertised(ginni)\n\ntherefore Advertised(ginni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5297"} {"premises": "The constancy privilege the blinnie. The constancy is phreatic. The constancy is playful. The constancy prink the blinnie. The blinnie is playful. The blinnie prink the constancy. The blinnie redevelop the constancy. If someone privilege the constancy and they chase the blinnie then the blinnie redevelop the constancy. The blinnie does not see the blinnie.", "logic": "\nPrivilege(constancy, blinnie)\nPhreatic(constancy)\nPlayful(constancy)\nPrink(constancy, blinnie)\nPlayful(blinnie)\nPrink(blinnie, constancy)\nRedevelop(blinnie, constancy)\nforall x (Privilege(x, constancy) and Privilege(x, blinnie) -> Redevelop(blinnie, constancy))\n\nnot Redevelop(blinnie, blinnie)\n\nnot Redevelop(blinnie, blinnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5297"} {"premises": "The madelena blate the tim. The madelena is faddy. The madelena is contented. The madelena needle the tim. The tim is contented. The tim needle the madelena. The tim daub the madelena. If someone blate the madelena and they chase the tim then the tim daub the madelena. The tim blate the tim.", "logic": "\nBlate(madelena, tim)\nFaddy(madelena)\nContented(madelena)\nNeedle(madelena, tim)\nContented(tim)\nNeedle(tim, madelena)\nDaub(tim, madelena)\nforall x (Blate(x, madelena) and Blate(x, tim) -> Daub(tim, madelena))\n\nBlate(tim, tim)\n\nBlate(tim, tim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5297"} {"premises": "Nelle is pudgy. Tansy is not linnean. Kathlene is pudgy. White people are polygonal. If someone is unkindly and barbarous then they are not pudgy. All polygonal, unkindly people are upstair. All undressed people are upstair. Young people are undressed. If Tansy is linnean then Tansy is undressed. Kathlene is pudgy.", "logic": "\nPudgy(nelle)\nnot Linnean(tansy)\nPudgy(kathlene)\nforall x (Upstair(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Unkindly(x) and Barbarous(x) -> not Pudgy(x))\nforall x (Polygonal(x) and Unkindly(x) -> Upstair(x))\nforall x (Undressed(x) -> Upstair(x))\nforall x (Pudgy(x) -> Undressed(x))\nLinnean(tansy) -> Undressed(tansy)\n\nPudgy(kathlene)\n\ntherefore Pudgy(kathlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Dunc is uniparous. Osbert is not fanned. Karleen is uniparous. White people are biface. If someone is divers and gushy then they are not uniparous. All biface, divers people are shelvy. All plethoric people are shelvy. Young people are plethoric. If Osbert is fanned then Osbert is plethoric. Dunc is not uniparous.", "logic": "\nUniparous(dunc)\nnot Fanned(osbert)\nUniparous(karleen)\nforall x (Shelvy(x) -> Biface(x))\nforall x (Divers(x) and Gushy(x) -> not Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Biface(x) and Divers(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Shelvy(x))\nforall x (Uniparous(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nFanned(osbert) -> Plethoric(osbert)\n\nnot Uniparous(dunc)\n\ntherefore Uniparous(dunc)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Jermaine is amused. Lucian is not squally. Dewitt is amused. White people are impacted. If someone is structured and eight then they are not amused. All impacted, structured people are anguillan. All ancillary people are anguillan. Young people are ancillary. If Lucian is squally then Lucian is ancillary. Jermaine is ancillary.", "logic": "\nAmused(jermaine)\nnot Squally(lucian)\nAmused(dewitt)\nforall x (Anguillan(x) -> Impacted(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) and Eight(x) -> not Amused(x))\nforall x (Impacted(x) and Structured(x) -> Anguillan(x))\nforall x (Ancillary(x) -> Anguillan(x))\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Ancillary(x))\nSqually(lucian) -> Ancillary(lucian)\n\nAncillary(jermaine)\n\nAmused(jermaine) and forall x (Amused(x) -> Ancillary(x)) -> therefore Ancillary(jermaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Ginelle is stretchy. Ellene is not ancient. Sheeree is stretchy. White people are forficate. If someone is humpbacked and inerrant then they are not stretchy. All forficate, humpbacked people are swinish. All thankless people are swinish. Young people are thankless. If Ellene is ancient then Ellene is thankless. Ginelle is not thankless.", "logic": "\nStretchy(ginelle)\nnot Ancient(ellene)\nStretchy(sheeree)\nforall x (Swinish(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Humpbacked(x) and Inerrant(x) -> not Stretchy(x))\nforall x (Forficate(x) and Humpbacked(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Thankless(x) -> Swinish(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Thankless(x))\nAncient(ellene) -> Thankless(ellene)\n\nnot Thankless(ginelle)\n\nStretchy(ginelle) and forall x (Stretchy(x) -> Thankless(x)) -> therefore Thankless(ginelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Maris is cancelled. Worthy is not exuvial. Harmony is cancelled. White people are watered. If someone is styptic and roseate then they are not cancelled. All watered, styptic people are brutal. All described people are brutal. Young people are described. If Worthy is exuvial then Worthy is described. Maris is brutal.", "logic": "\nCancelled(maris)\nnot Exuvial(worthy)\nCancelled(harmony)\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Watered(x))\nforall x (Styptic(x) and Roseate(x) -> not Cancelled(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) and Styptic(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Described(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) -> Described(x))\nExuvial(worthy) -> Described(worthy)\n\nBrutal(maris)\n\nCancelled(maris) and forall x (Cancelled(x) -> Described(x)) -> therefore Described(maris) Described(maris) and forall x (Described(x) -> Brutal(x)) -> therefore Brutal(maris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Starla is groovy. Kathie is not tricuspid. Nikkie is groovy. White people are gracile. If someone is productive and silty then they are not groovy. All gracile, productive people are senior. All sepaloid people are senior. Young people are sepaloid. If Kathie is tricuspid then Kathie is sepaloid. Starla is not senior.", "logic": "\nGroovy(starla)\nnot Tricuspid(kathie)\nGroovy(nikkie)\nforall x (Senior(x) -> Gracile(x))\nforall x (Productive(x) and Silty(x) -> not Groovy(x))\nforall x (Gracile(x) and Productive(x) -> Senior(x))\nforall x (Sepaloid(x) -> Senior(x))\nforall x (Groovy(x) -> Sepaloid(x))\nTricuspid(kathie) -> Sepaloid(kathie)\n\nnot Senior(starla)\n\nGroovy(starla) and forall x (Groovy(x) -> Sepaloid(x)) -> therefore Sepaloid(starla) Sepaloid(starla) and forall x (Sepaloid(x) -> Senior(x)) -> therefore Senior(starla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Nitin is chaldean. Paulette is not latticed. Bunny is chaldean. White people are elaborated. If someone is hewn and tabby then they are not chaldean. All elaborated, hewn people are pained. All shortish people are pained. Young people are shortish. If Paulette is latticed then Paulette is shortish. Bunny is elaborated.", "logic": "\nChaldean(nitin)\nnot Latticed(paulette)\nChaldean(bunny)\nforall x (Pained(x) -> Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Hewn(x) and Tabby(x) -> not Chaldean(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and Hewn(x) -> Pained(x))\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Pained(x))\nforall x (Chaldean(x) -> Shortish(x))\nLatticed(paulette) -> Shortish(paulette)\n\nElaborated(bunny)\n\nChaldean(bunny) and forall x (Chaldean(x) -> Shortish(x)) -> therefore Shortish(bunny) Shortish(bunny) and forall x (Shortish(x) -> Pained(x)) -> therefore Pained(bunny) Pained(bunny) and forall x (Pained(x) -> Elaborated(x)) -> therefore Elaborated(bunny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Jolee is azimuthal. Valene is not legal. Bride is azimuthal. White people are ulcerous. If someone is twopenny and absorbed then they are not azimuthal. All ulcerous, twopenny people are shitty. All diarrhoeal people are shitty. Young people are diarrhoeal. If Valene is legal then Valene is diarrhoeal. Jolee is not ulcerous.", "logic": "\nAzimuthal(jolee)\nnot Legal(valene)\nAzimuthal(bride)\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Ulcerous(x))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Absorbed(x) -> not Azimuthal(x))\nforall x (Ulcerous(x) and Twopenny(x) -> Shitty(x))\nforall x (Diarrhoeal(x) -> Shitty(x))\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) -> Diarrhoeal(x))\nLegal(valene) -> Diarrhoeal(valene)\n\nnot Ulcerous(jolee)\n\nAzimuthal(jolee) and forall x (Azimuthal(x) -> Diarrhoeal(x)) -> therefore Diarrhoeal(jolee) Diarrhoeal(jolee) and forall x (Diarrhoeal(x) -> Shitty(x)) -> therefore Shitty(jolee) Shitty(jolee) and forall x (Shitty(x) -> Ulcerous(x)) -> therefore Ulcerous(jolee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Myrtle is dirigible. Katuscha is not tender. Amberly is dirigible. White people are faustian. If someone is suspicious and unpainful then they are not dirigible. All faustian, suspicious people are ransacked. All javanese people are ransacked. Young people are javanese. If Katuscha is tender then Katuscha is javanese. Katuscha is not faustian.", "logic": "\nDirigible(myrtle)\nnot Tender(katuscha)\nDirigible(amberly)\nforall x (Ransacked(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Suspicious(x) and Unpainful(x) -> not Dirigible(x))\nforall x (Faustian(x) and Suspicious(x) -> Ransacked(x))\nforall x (Javanese(x) -> Ransacked(x))\nforall x (Dirigible(x) -> Javanese(x))\nTender(katuscha) -> Javanese(katuscha)\n\nnot Faustian(katuscha)\n\nforall x (Ransacked(x) -> Faustian(x)) <- forall x (Javanese(x) -> Ransacked(x)) <- forall x (Dirigible(x) -> Javanese(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Tella is valved. Rodrique is not kinky. Adorne is valved. White people are democratic. If someone is ersatz and undercover then they are not valved. All democratic, ersatz people are worthful. All clever people are worthful. Young people are clever. If Rodrique is kinky then Rodrique is clever. Rodrique is clever.", "logic": "\nValved(tella)\nnot Kinky(rodrique)\nValved(adorne)\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> Democratic(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) and Undercover(x) -> not Valved(x))\nforall x (Democratic(x) and Ersatz(x) -> Worthful(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) -> Worthful(x))\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Clever(x))\nKinky(rodrique) -> Clever(rodrique)\n\nClever(rodrique)\n\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Clever(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Kenny is ungrasped. Lisette is not cranky. Noe is ungrasped. White people are stepwise. If someone is ghostlike and pesky then they are not ungrasped. All stepwise, ghostlike people are unshoed. All hardcover people are unshoed. Young people are hardcover. If Lisette is cranky then Lisette is hardcover. Lisette is not unshoed.", "logic": "\nUngrasped(kenny)\nnot Cranky(lisette)\nUngrasped(noe)\nforall x (Unshoed(x) -> Stepwise(x))\nforall x (Ghostlike(x) and Pesky(x) -> not Ungrasped(x))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) and Ghostlike(x) -> Unshoed(x))\nforall x (Hardcover(x) -> Unshoed(x))\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Hardcover(x))\nCranky(lisette) -> Hardcover(lisette)\n\nnot Unshoed(lisette)\n\nforall x (Hardcover(x) -> Unshoed(x)) <- forall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Hardcover(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Nyssa is bass. Wynton is not thorny. Carolin is bass. White people are maledict. If someone is stylized and wrongful then they are not bass. All maledict, stylized people are dislikable. All bicorned people are dislikable. Young people are bicorned. If Wynton is thorny then Wynton is bicorned. Wynton is wrongful.", "logic": "\nBass(nyssa)\nnot Thorny(wynton)\nBass(carolin)\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Stylized(x) and Wrongful(x) -> not Bass(x))\nforall x (Maledict(x) and Stylized(x) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Bicorned(x) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Bass(x) -> Bicorned(x))\nThorny(wynton) -> Bicorned(wynton)\n\nWrongful(wynton)\n\nWrongful(wynton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Georgie is utopian. Carmelita is not ostensible. Coral is utopian. White people are unapparent. If someone is peroneal and epizoan then they are not utopian. All unapparent, peroneal people are beery. All twopenny people are beery. Young people are twopenny. If Carmelita is ostensible then Carmelita is twopenny. Georgie is not ostensible.", "logic": "\nUtopian(georgie)\nnot Ostensible(carmelita)\nUtopian(coral)\nforall x (Beery(x) -> Unapparent(x))\nforall x (Peroneal(x) and Epizoan(x) -> not Utopian(x))\nforall x (Unapparent(x) and Peroneal(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Utopian(x) -> Twopenny(x))\nOstensible(carmelita) -> Twopenny(carmelita)\n\nnot Ostensible(georgie)\n\nnot Ostensible(georgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Wyn is confiscate. Johanna is not cranky. Iago is confiscate. White people are wobbly. If someone is leonine and heraldist then they are not confiscate. All wobbly, leonine people are cadent. All bungling people are cadent. Young people are bungling. If Johanna is cranky then Johanna is bungling. Johanna is leonine.", "logic": "\nConfiscate(wyn)\nnot Cranky(johanna)\nConfiscate(iago)\nforall x (Cadent(x) -> Wobbly(x))\nforall x (Leonine(x) and Heraldist(x) -> not Confiscate(x))\nforall x (Wobbly(x) and Leonine(x) -> Cadent(x))\nforall x (Bungling(x) -> Cadent(x))\nforall x (Confiscate(x) -> Bungling(x))\nCranky(johanna) -> Bungling(johanna)\n\nLeonine(johanna)\n\nLeonine(johanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Rem is cellular. Dennie is not sprawling. Nichols is cellular. White people are reversed. If someone is cool and allergenic then they are not cellular. All reversed, cool people are scythian. All crumpled people are scythian. Young people are crumpled. If Dennie is sprawling then Dennie is crumpled. Rem is not cool.", "logic": "\nCellular(rem)\nnot Sprawling(dennie)\nCellular(nichols)\nforall x (Scythian(x) -> Reversed(x))\nforall x (Cool(x) and Allergenic(x) -> not Cellular(x))\nforall x (Reversed(x) and Cool(x) -> Scythian(x))\nforall x (Crumpled(x) -> Scythian(x))\nforall x (Cellular(x) -> Crumpled(x))\nSprawling(dennie) -> Crumpled(dennie)\n\nnot Cool(rem)\n\nnot Cool(rem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "Mair is airless. Janella is not gusty. Bridgett is airless. White people are subarctic. If someone is patrician and ascending then they are not airless. All subarctic, patrician people are possessive. All brotherly people are possessive. Young people are brotherly. If Janella is gusty then Janella is brotherly. Janella is airless.", "logic": "\nAirless(mair)\nnot Gusty(janella)\nAirless(bridgett)\nforall x (Possessive(x) -> Subarctic(x))\nforall x (Patrician(x) and Ascending(x) -> not Airless(x))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and Patrician(x) -> Possessive(x))\nforall x (Brotherly(x) -> Possessive(x))\nforall x (Airless(x) -> Brotherly(x))\nGusty(janella) -> Brotherly(janella)\n\nAirless(janella)\n\nAirless(janella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1091"} {"premises": "The pyotr parade the lyndsay. The pyotr is connubial. The lyndsay enter the pyotr. If something preserve the lyndsay then it parade the lyndsay. If something parade the lyndsay and the lyndsay preserve the pyotr then the lyndsay is not jinxed. If something enter the lyndsay then it is confirming. If something enter the pyotr then it enter the lyndsay. All confirming things are jinxed. If something enter the lyndsay and the lyndsay does not see the pyotr then the pyotr is not jinxed. The pyotr is connubial.", "logic": "\nParade(pyotr, lyndsay)\nConnubial(pyotr)\nEnter(lyndsay, pyotr)\nforall x (Preserve(x, lyndsay) -> Parade(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Parade(x, lyndsay) and Preserve(lyndsay, pyotr) -> not Jinxed(lyndsay))\nforall x (Enter(x, lyndsay) -> Confirming(x))\nforall x (Enter(x, pyotr) -> Enter(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Confirming(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Enter(x, lyndsay) and not Enter(lyndsay, pyotr) -> not Jinxed(pyotr))\n\nConnubial(pyotr)\n\ntherefore Connubial(pyotr)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The jermaine educe the gallagher. The jermaine is arching. The gallagher repercuss the jermaine. If something asphalt the gallagher then it educe the gallagher. If something educe the gallagher and the gallagher asphalt the jermaine then the gallagher is not dissenting. If something repercuss the gallagher then it is pedestrian. If something repercuss the jermaine then it repercuss the gallagher. All pedestrian things are dissenting. If something repercuss the gallagher and the gallagher does not see the jermaine then the jermaine is not dissenting. The jermaine does not eat the gallagher.", "logic": "\nEduce(jermaine, gallagher)\nArching(jermaine)\nRepercuss(gallagher, jermaine)\nforall x (Asphalt(x, gallagher) -> Educe(x, gallagher))\nforall x (Educe(x, gallagher) and Asphalt(gallagher, jermaine) -> not Dissenting(gallagher))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, gallagher) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, jermaine) -> Repercuss(x, gallagher))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> Dissenting(x))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, gallagher) and not Repercuss(gallagher, jermaine) -> not Dissenting(jermaine))\n\nnot Educe(jermaine, gallagher)\n\ntherefore Educe(jermaine, gallagher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The rustin bubble the ainslie. The rustin is tacky. The ainslie hive the rustin. If something immobilise the ainslie then it bubble the ainslie. If something bubble the ainslie and the ainslie immobilise the rustin then the ainslie is not misogynic. If something hive the ainslie then it is antacid. If something hive the rustin then it hive the ainslie. All antacid things are misogynic. If something hive the ainslie and the ainslie does not see the rustin then the rustin is not misogynic. The ainslie hive the ainslie.", "logic": "\nBubble(rustin, ainslie)\nTacky(rustin)\nHive(ainslie, rustin)\nforall x (Immobilise(x, ainslie) -> Bubble(x, ainslie))\nforall x (Bubble(x, ainslie) and Immobilise(ainslie, rustin) -> not Misogynic(ainslie))\nforall x (Hive(x, ainslie) -> Antacid(x))\nforall x (Hive(x, rustin) -> Hive(x, ainslie))\nforall x (Antacid(x) -> Misogynic(x))\nforall x (Hive(x, ainslie) and not Hive(ainslie, rustin) -> not Misogynic(rustin))\n\nHive(ainslie, ainslie)\n\nHive(ainslie, rustin) and forall x (Hive(x, rustin) -> Hive(x, ainslie)) -> therefore Hive(ainslie, ainslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The connie wholesale the clarie. The connie is athletic. The clarie overexert the connie. If something screen the clarie then it wholesale the clarie. If something wholesale the clarie and the clarie screen the connie then the clarie is not misshapen. If something overexert the clarie then it is timeless. If something overexert the connie then it overexert the clarie. All timeless things are misshapen. If something overexert the clarie and the clarie does not see the connie then the connie is not misshapen. The clarie does not see the clarie.", "logic": "\nWholesale(connie, clarie)\nAthletic(connie)\nOverexert(clarie, connie)\nforall x (Screen(x, clarie) -> Wholesale(x, clarie))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, clarie) and Screen(clarie, connie) -> not Misshapen(clarie))\nforall x (Overexert(x, clarie) -> Timeless(x))\nforall x (Overexert(x, connie) -> Overexert(x, clarie))\nforall x (Timeless(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nforall x (Overexert(x, clarie) and not Overexert(clarie, connie) -> not Misshapen(connie))\n\nnot Overexert(clarie, clarie)\n\nOverexert(clarie, connie) and forall x (Overexert(x, connie) -> Overexert(x, clarie)) -> therefore Overexert(clarie, clarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The marlie squint the cynthia. The marlie is cheating. The cynthia civilise the marlie. If something accustom the cynthia then it squint the cynthia. If something squint the cynthia and the cynthia accustom the marlie then the cynthia is not cambrian. If something civilise the cynthia then it is risque. If something civilise the marlie then it civilise the cynthia. All risque things are cambrian. If something civilise the cynthia and the cynthia does not see the marlie then the marlie is not cambrian. The cynthia is risque.", "logic": "\nSquint(marlie, cynthia)\nCheating(marlie)\nCivilise(cynthia, marlie)\nforall x (Accustom(x, cynthia) -> Squint(x, cynthia))\nforall x (Squint(x, cynthia) and Accustom(cynthia, marlie) -> not Cambrian(cynthia))\nforall x (Civilise(x, cynthia) -> Risque(x))\nforall x (Civilise(x, marlie) -> Civilise(x, cynthia))\nforall x (Risque(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Civilise(x, cynthia) and not Civilise(cynthia, marlie) -> not Cambrian(marlie))\n\nRisque(cynthia)\n\nCivilise(cynthia, marlie) and forall x (Civilise(x, marlie) -> Civilise(x, cynthia)) -> therefore Civilise(cynthia, cynthia) Civilise(cynthia, cynthia) and forall x (Civilise(x, cynthia) -> Risque(x)) -> therefore Risque(cynthia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The bennie fault the kurt. The bennie is diligent. The kurt molder the bennie. If something doze the kurt then it fault the kurt. If something fault the kurt and the kurt doze the bennie then the kurt is not flowering. If something molder the kurt then it is arsenical. If something molder the bennie then it molder the kurt. All arsenical things are flowering. If something molder the kurt and the kurt does not see the bennie then the bennie is not flowering. The kurt is not arsenical.", "logic": "\nFault(bennie, kurt)\nDiligent(bennie)\nMolder(kurt, bennie)\nforall x (Doze(x, kurt) -> Fault(x, kurt))\nforall x (Fault(x, kurt) and Doze(kurt, bennie) -> not Flowering(kurt))\nforall x (Molder(x, kurt) -> Arsenical(x))\nforall x (Molder(x, bennie) -> Molder(x, kurt))\nforall x (Arsenical(x) -> Flowering(x))\nforall x (Molder(x, kurt) and not Molder(kurt, bennie) -> not Flowering(bennie))\n\nnot Arsenical(kurt)\n\nMolder(kurt, bennie) and forall x (Molder(x, bennie) -> Molder(x, kurt)) -> therefore Molder(kurt, kurt) Molder(kurt, kurt) and forall x (Molder(x, kurt) -> Arsenical(x)) -> therefore Arsenical(kurt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The enrica dyke the maxy. The enrica is ladylike. The maxy airmail the enrica. If something retrospect the maxy then it dyke the maxy. If something dyke the maxy and the maxy retrospect the enrica then the maxy is not inverted. If something airmail the maxy then it is colicky. If something airmail the enrica then it airmail the maxy. All colicky things are inverted. If something airmail the maxy and the maxy does not see the enrica then the enrica is not inverted. The maxy is inverted.", "logic": "\nDyke(enrica, maxy)\nLadylike(enrica)\nAirmail(maxy, enrica)\nforall x (Retrospect(x, maxy) -> Dyke(x, maxy))\nforall x (Dyke(x, maxy) and Retrospect(maxy, enrica) -> not Inverted(maxy))\nforall x (Airmail(x, maxy) -> Colicky(x))\nforall x (Airmail(x, enrica) -> Airmail(x, maxy))\nforall x (Colicky(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Airmail(x, maxy) and not Airmail(maxy, enrica) -> not Inverted(enrica))\n\nInverted(maxy)\n\nAirmail(maxy, enrica) and forall x (Airmail(x, enrica) -> Airmail(x, maxy)) -> therefore Airmail(maxy, maxy) Airmail(maxy, maxy) and forall x (Airmail(x, maxy) -> Colicky(x)) -> therefore Colicky(maxy) Colicky(maxy) and forall x (Colicky(x) -> Inverted(x)) -> therefore Inverted(maxy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The rochette delineate the pat. The rochette is excretory. The pat libel the rochette. If something brace the pat then it delineate the pat. If something delineate the pat and the pat brace the rochette then the pat is not pandemic. If something libel the pat then it is sexy. If something libel the rochette then it libel the pat. All sexy things are pandemic. If something libel the pat and the pat does not see the rochette then the rochette is not pandemic. The pat is not pandemic.", "logic": "\nDelineate(rochette, pat)\nExcretory(rochette)\nLibel(pat, rochette)\nforall x (Brace(x, pat) -> Delineate(x, pat))\nforall x (Delineate(x, pat) and Brace(pat, rochette) -> not Pandemic(pat))\nforall x (Libel(x, pat) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Libel(x, rochette) -> Libel(x, pat))\nforall x (Sexy(x) -> Pandemic(x))\nforall x (Libel(x, pat) and not Libel(pat, rochette) -> not Pandemic(rochette))\n\nnot Pandemic(pat)\n\nLibel(pat, rochette) and forall x (Libel(x, rochette) -> Libel(x, pat)) -> therefore Libel(pat, pat) Libel(pat, pat) and forall x (Libel(x, pat) -> Sexy(x)) -> therefore Sexy(pat) Sexy(pat) and forall x (Sexy(x) -> Pandemic(x)) -> therefore Pandemic(pat)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The imogene socialize the dwain. The imogene is supported. The dwain bomb the imogene. If something cannulise the dwain then it socialize the dwain. If something socialize the dwain and the dwain cannulise the imogene then the dwain is not crisscross. If something bomb the dwain then it is decayed. If something bomb the imogene then it bomb the dwain. All decayed things are crisscross. If something bomb the dwain and the dwain does not see the imogene then the imogene is not crisscross. The dwain does not eat the dwain.", "logic": "\nSocialize(imogene, dwain)\nSupported(imogene)\nBomb(dwain, imogene)\nforall x (Cannulise(x, dwain) -> Socialize(x, dwain))\nforall x (Socialize(x, dwain) and Cannulise(dwain, imogene) -> not Crisscross(dwain))\nforall x (Bomb(x, dwain) -> Decayed(x))\nforall x (Bomb(x, imogene) -> Bomb(x, dwain))\nforall x (Decayed(x) -> Crisscross(x))\nforall x (Bomb(x, dwain) and not Bomb(dwain, imogene) -> not Crisscross(imogene))\n\nnot Socialize(dwain, dwain)\n\nforall x (Cannulise(x, dwain) -> Socialize(x, dwain)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The hamel skew the julee. The hamel is moldovan. The julee cloture the hamel. If something scry the julee then it skew the julee. If something skew the julee and the julee scry the hamel then the julee is not unblushing. If something cloture the julee then it is burnable. If something cloture the hamel then it cloture the julee. All burnable things are unblushing. If something cloture the julee and the julee does not see the hamel then the hamel is not unblushing. The hamel is unblushing.", "logic": "\nSkew(hamel, julee)\nMoldovan(hamel)\nCloture(julee, hamel)\nforall x (Scry(x, julee) -> Skew(x, julee))\nforall x (Skew(x, julee) and Scry(julee, hamel) -> not Unblushing(julee))\nforall x (Cloture(x, julee) -> Burnable(x))\nforall x (Cloture(x, hamel) -> Cloture(x, julee))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Unblushing(x))\nforall x (Cloture(x, julee) and not Cloture(julee, hamel) -> not Unblushing(hamel))\n\nUnblushing(hamel)\n\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Unblushing(x)) <- forall x (Cloture(x, julee) -> Burnable(x)) <- forall x (Cloture(x, hamel) -> Cloture(x, julee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The nathanael fluoridize the darb. The nathanael is tegular. The darb corset the nathanael. If something restore the darb then it fluoridize the darb. If something fluoridize the darb and the darb restore the nathanael then the darb is not taped. If something corset the darb then it is exorbitant. If something corset the nathanael then it corset the darb. All exorbitant things are taped. If something corset the darb and the darb does not see the nathanael then the nathanael is not taped. The nathanael does not see the darb.", "logic": "\nFluoridize(nathanael, darb)\nTegular(nathanael)\nCorset(darb, nathanael)\nforall x (Restore(x, darb) -> Fluoridize(x, darb))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, darb) and Restore(darb, nathanael) -> not Taped(darb))\nforall x (Corset(x, darb) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Corset(x, nathanael) -> Corset(x, darb))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Taped(x))\nforall x (Corset(x, darb) and not Corset(darb, nathanael) -> not Taped(nathanael))\n\nnot Corset(nathanael, darb)\n\nforall x (Corset(x, nathanael) -> Corset(x, darb)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The audrye twit the silvia. The audrye is outsize. The silvia syllabise the audrye. If something recruit the silvia then it twit the silvia. If something twit the silvia and the silvia recruit the audrye then the silvia is not ablaze. If something syllabise the silvia then it is minimum. If something syllabise the audrye then it syllabise the silvia. All minimum things are ablaze. If something syllabise the silvia and the silvia does not see the audrye then the audrye is not ablaze. The audrye is minimum.", "logic": "\nTwit(audrye, silvia)\nOutsize(audrye)\nSyllabise(silvia, audrye)\nforall x (Recruit(x, silvia) -> Twit(x, silvia))\nforall x (Twit(x, silvia) and Recruit(silvia, audrye) -> not Ablaze(silvia))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, silvia) -> Minimum(x))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, audrye) -> Syllabise(x, silvia))\nforall x (Minimum(x) -> Ablaze(x))\nforall x (Syllabise(x, silvia) and not Syllabise(silvia, audrye) -> not Ablaze(audrye))\n\nMinimum(audrye)\n\nforall x (Syllabise(x, silvia) -> Minimum(x)) <- forall x (Syllabise(x, audrye) -> Syllabise(x, silvia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The abbie revel the harvey. The abbie is aweigh. The harvey purpurate the abbie. If something resemble the harvey then it revel the harvey. If something revel the harvey and the harvey resemble the abbie then the harvey is not squirting. If something purpurate the harvey then it is sequential. If something purpurate the abbie then it purpurate the harvey. All sequential things are squirting. If something purpurate the harvey and the harvey does not see the abbie then the abbie is not squirting. The abbie is not kind.", "logic": "\nRevel(abbie, harvey)\nAweigh(abbie)\nPurpurate(harvey, abbie)\nforall x (Resemble(x, harvey) -> Revel(x, harvey))\nforall x (Revel(x, harvey) and Resemble(harvey, abbie) -> not Squirting(harvey))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, harvey) -> Sequential(x))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, abbie) -> Purpurate(x, harvey))\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, harvey) and not Purpurate(harvey, abbie) -> not Squirting(abbie))\n\nnot Kind(abbie)\n\nnot Kind(abbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The edgardo addict the antonia. The edgardo is compliant. The antonia vitriol the edgardo. If something crisscross the antonia then it addict the antonia. If something addict the antonia and the antonia crisscross the edgardo then the antonia is not done. If something vitriol the antonia then it is agamous. If something vitriol the edgardo then it vitriol the antonia. All agamous things are done. If something vitriol the antonia and the antonia does not see the edgardo then the edgardo is not done. The antonia addict the edgardo.", "logic": "\nAddict(edgardo, antonia)\nCompliant(edgardo)\nVitriol(antonia, edgardo)\nforall x (Crisscross(x, antonia) -> Addict(x, antonia))\nforall x (Addict(x, antonia) and Crisscross(antonia, edgardo) -> not Done(antonia))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, antonia) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, edgardo) -> Vitriol(x, antonia))\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Done(x))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, antonia) and not Vitriol(antonia, edgardo) -> not Done(edgardo))\n\nAddict(antonia, edgardo)\n\nAddict(antonia, edgardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The wandis gyrate the rawley. The wandis is overjoyed. The rawley smell the wandis. If something assume the rawley then it gyrate the rawley. If something gyrate the rawley and the rawley assume the wandis then the rawley is not undramatic. If something smell the rawley then it is maddened. If something smell the wandis then it smell the rawley. All maddened things are undramatic. If something smell the rawley and the rawley does not see the wandis then the wandis is not undramatic. The rawley does not like the wandis.", "logic": "\nGyrate(wandis, rawley)\nOverjoyed(wandis)\nSmell(rawley, wandis)\nforall x (Assume(x, rawley) -> Gyrate(x, rawley))\nforall x (Gyrate(x, rawley) and Assume(rawley, wandis) -> not Undramatic(rawley))\nforall x (Smell(x, rawley) -> Maddened(x))\nforall x (Smell(x, wandis) -> Smell(x, rawley))\nforall x (Maddened(x) -> Undramatic(x))\nforall x (Smell(x, rawley) and not Smell(rawley, wandis) -> not Undramatic(wandis))\n\nnot Assume(rawley, wandis)\n\nnot Assume(rawley, wandis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The murphy carbonise the scottie. The murphy is maximizing. The scottie suck the murphy. If something hive the scottie then it carbonise the scottie. If something carbonise the scottie and the scottie hive the murphy then the scottie is not naiant. If something suck the scottie then it is perdurable. If something suck the murphy then it suck the scottie. All perdurable things are naiant. If something suck the scottie and the scottie does not see the murphy then the murphy is not naiant. The murphy is red.", "logic": "\nCarbonise(murphy, scottie)\nMaximizing(murphy)\nSuck(scottie, murphy)\nforall x (Hive(x, scottie) -> Carbonise(x, scottie))\nforall x (Carbonise(x, scottie) and Hive(scottie, murphy) -> not Naiant(scottie))\nforall x (Suck(x, scottie) -> Perdurable(x))\nforall x (Suck(x, murphy) -> Suck(x, scottie))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) -> Naiant(x))\nforall x (Suck(x, scottie) and not Suck(scottie, murphy) -> not Naiant(murphy))\n\nRed(murphy)\n\nRed(murphy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1275"} {"premises": "The mellie is burdened. The mellie sunbathe the charmane. The moises solder the gardiner. The moises is burdened. The charmane solder the moises. The gardiner solder the moises. The gardiner silkscreen the mellie. If something is suspensive then it solder the mellie. If something is aculeate then it silkscreen the moises. If something solder the mellie then it silkscreen the gardiner. If something solder the gardiner then the gardiner is aculeate. If something silkscreen the mellie and it silkscreen the moises then the mellie silkscreen the moises. If something solder the charmane and the charmane is flavourful then it solder the moises. The mellie is burdened.", "logic": "\nBurdened(mellie)\nSunbathe(mellie, charmane)\nSolder(moises, gardiner)\nBurdened(moises)\nSolder(charmane, moises)\nSolder(gardiner, moises)\nSilkscreen(gardiner, mellie)\nforall x (Suspensive(x) -> Solder(x, mellie))\nforall x (Aculeate(x) -> Silkscreen(x, moises))\nforall x (Solder(x, mellie) -> Silkscreen(x, gardiner))\nforall x (Solder(x, gardiner) -> Aculeate(gardiner))\nforall x (Silkscreen(x, mellie) and Silkscreen(x, moises) -> Silkscreen(mellie, moises))\nforall x (Solder(x, charmane) and Flavourful(charmane) -> Solder(x, moises))\n\nBurdened(mellie)\n\ntherefore Burdened(mellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The darryl is amber. The darryl houseclean the sherye. The terrance defy the bliss. The terrance is amber. The sherye defy the terrance. The bliss defy the terrance. The bliss enable the darryl. If something is healed then it defy the darryl. If something is coetaneous then it enable the terrance. If something defy the darryl then it enable the bliss. If something defy the bliss then the bliss is coetaneous. If something enable the darryl and it enable the terrance then the darryl enable the terrance. If something defy the sherye and the sherye is amerciable then it defy the terrance. The bliss does not eat the terrance.", "logic": "\nAmber(darryl)\nHouseclean(darryl, sherye)\nDefy(terrance, bliss)\nAmber(terrance)\nDefy(sherye, terrance)\nDefy(bliss, terrance)\nEnable(bliss, darryl)\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Defy(x, darryl))\nforall x (Coetaneous(x) -> Enable(x, terrance))\nforall x (Defy(x, darryl) -> Enable(x, bliss))\nforall x (Defy(x, bliss) -> Coetaneous(bliss))\nforall x (Enable(x, darryl) and Enable(x, terrance) -> Enable(darryl, terrance))\nforall x (Defy(x, sherye) and Amerciable(sherye) -> Defy(x, terrance))\n\nnot Defy(bliss, terrance)\n\ntherefore Defy(bliss, terrance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The karim is reniform. The karim fulfil the parker. The nell amass the frank. The nell is reniform. The parker amass the nell. The frank amass the nell. The frank refit the karim. If something is factorial then it amass the karim. If something is strenuous then it refit the nell. If something amass the karim then it refit the frank. If something amass the frank then the frank is strenuous. If something refit the karim and it refit the nell then the karim refit the nell. If something amass the parker and the parker is moorish then it amass the nell. The frank is strenuous.", "logic": "\nReniform(karim)\nFulfil(karim, parker)\nAmass(nell, frank)\nReniform(nell)\nAmass(parker, nell)\nAmass(frank, nell)\nRefit(frank, karim)\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> Amass(x, karim))\nforall x (Strenuous(x) -> Refit(x, nell))\nforall x (Amass(x, karim) -> Refit(x, frank))\nforall x (Amass(x, frank) -> Strenuous(frank))\nforall x (Refit(x, karim) and Refit(x, nell) -> Refit(karim, nell))\nforall x (Amass(x, parker) and Moorish(parker) -> Amass(x, nell))\n\nStrenuous(frank)\n\nAmass(nell, frank) and forall x (Amass(x, frank) -> Strenuous(frank)) -> therefore Strenuous(frank)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The kathlin is gibbous. The kathlin halter the fredi. The deeann hitch the sara. The deeann is gibbous. The fredi hitch the deeann. The sara hitch the deeann. The sara surcharge the kathlin. If something is colonized then it hitch the kathlin. If something is carnation then it surcharge the deeann. If something hitch the kathlin then it surcharge the sara. If something hitch the sara then the sara is carnation. If something surcharge the kathlin and it surcharge the deeann then the kathlin surcharge the deeann. If something hitch the fredi and the fredi is subatomic then it hitch the deeann. The sara is not carnation.", "logic": "\nGibbous(kathlin)\nHalter(kathlin, fredi)\nHitch(deeann, sara)\nGibbous(deeann)\nHitch(fredi, deeann)\nHitch(sara, deeann)\nSurcharge(sara, kathlin)\nforall x (Colonized(x) -> Hitch(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Carnation(x) -> Surcharge(x, deeann))\nforall x (Hitch(x, kathlin) -> Surcharge(x, sara))\nforall x (Hitch(x, sara) -> Carnation(sara))\nforall x (Surcharge(x, kathlin) and Surcharge(x, deeann) -> Surcharge(kathlin, deeann))\nforall x (Hitch(x, fredi) and Subatomic(fredi) -> Hitch(x, deeann))\n\nnot Carnation(sara)\n\nHitch(deeann, sara) and forall x (Hitch(x, sara) -> Carnation(sara)) -> therefore Carnation(sara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The romain is civilised. The romain weaponize the ronica. The kaspar stand the serene. The kaspar is civilised. The ronica stand the kaspar. The serene stand the kaspar. The serene evaluate the romain. If something is pertinent then it stand the romain. If something is neighborly then it evaluate the kaspar. If something stand the romain then it evaluate the serene. If something stand the serene then the serene is neighborly. If something evaluate the romain and it evaluate the kaspar then the romain evaluate the kaspar. If something stand the ronica and the ronica is neurotic then it stand the kaspar. The serene evaluate the kaspar.", "logic": "\nCivilised(romain)\nWeaponize(romain, ronica)\nStand(kaspar, serene)\nCivilised(kaspar)\nStand(ronica, kaspar)\nStand(serene, kaspar)\nEvaluate(serene, romain)\nforall x (Pertinent(x) -> Stand(x, romain))\nforall x (Neighborly(x) -> Evaluate(x, kaspar))\nforall x (Stand(x, romain) -> Evaluate(x, serene))\nforall x (Stand(x, serene) -> Neighborly(serene))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, romain) and Evaluate(x, kaspar) -> Evaluate(romain, kaspar))\nforall x (Stand(x, ronica) and Neurotic(ronica) -> Stand(x, kaspar))\n\nEvaluate(serene, kaspar)\n\nStand(kaspar, serene) and forall x (Stand(x, serene) -> Neighborly(serene)) -> therefore Neighborly(serene) Neighborly(serene) and forall x (Neighborly(x) -> Evaluate(x, kaspar)) -> therefore Evaluate(serene, kaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The sydelle is theistic. The sydelle agitate the wolfram. The laird honor the tatum. The laird is theistic. The wolfram honor the laird. The tatum honor the laird. The tatum dress the sydelle. If something is cyanophyte then it honor the sydelle. If something is ototoxic then it dress the laird. If something honor the sydelle then it dress the tatum. If something honor the tatum then the tatum is ototoxic. If something dress the sydelle and it dress the laird then the sydelle dress the laird. If something honor the wolfram and the wolfram is rainy then it honor the laird. The tatum does not need the laird.", "logic": "\nTheistic(sydelle)\nAgitate(sydelle, wolfram)\nHonor(laird, tatum)\nTheistic(laird)\nHonor(wolfram, laird)\nHonor(tatum, laird)\nDress(tatum, sydelle)\nforall x (Cyanophyte(x) -> Honor(x, sydelle))\nforall x (Ototoxic(x) -> Dress(x, laird))\nforall x (Honor(x, sydelle) -> Dress(x, tatum))\nforall x (Honor(x, tatum) -> Ototoxic(tatum))\nforall x (Dress(x, sydelle) and Dress(x, laird) -> Dress(sydelle, laird))\nforall x (Honor(x, wolfram) and Rainy(wolfram) -> Honor(x, laird))\n\nnot Dress(tatum, laird)\n\nHonor(laird, tatum) and forall x (Honor(x, tatum) -> Ototoxic(tatum)) -> therefore Ototoxic(tatum) Ototoxic(tatum) and forall x (Ototoxic(x) -> Dress(x, laird)) -> therefore Dress(tatum, laird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The kellyann is better. The kellyann tippytoe the burgess. The zoe demonise the karie. The zoe is better. The burgess demonise the zoe. The karie demonise the zoe. The karie calibrate the kellyann. If something is viscid then it demonise the kellyann. If something is womanlike then it calibrate the zoe. If something demonise the kellyann then it calibrate the karie. If something demonise the karie then the karie is womanlike. If something calibrate the kellyann and it calibrate the zoe then the kellyann calibrate the zoe. If something demonise the burgess and the burgess is pacifistic then it demonise the zoe. The kellyann calibrate the zoe.", "logic": "\nBetter(kellyann)\nTippytoe(kellyann, burgess)\nDemonise(zoe, karie)\nBetter(zoe)\nDemonise(burgess, zoe)\nDemonise(karie, zoe)\nCalibrate(karie, kellyann)\nforall x (Viscid(x) -> Demonise(x, kellyann))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Calibrate(x, zoe))\nforall x (Demonise(x, kellyann) -> Calibrate(x, karie))\nforall x (Demonise(x, karie) -> Womanlike(karie))\nforall x (Calibrate(x, kellyann) and Calibrate(x, zoe) -> Calibrate(kellyann, zoe))\nforall x (Demonise(x, burgess) and Pacifistic(burgess) -> Demonise(x, zoe))\n\nCalibrate(kellyann, zoe)\n\nDemonise(zoe, karie) and forall x (Demonise(x, karie) -> Womanlike(karie)) -> therefore Womanlike(karie) Womanlike(karie) and forall x (Womanlike(x) -> Calibrate(x, zoe)) -> therefore Calibrate(karie, zoe) Calibrate(karie, kellyann) and Calibrate(karie, zoe) and forall x (Calibrate(x, kellyann) and Calibrate(x, zoe) -> Calibrate(kellyann, zoe)) -> therefore Calibrate(kellyann, zoe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The staford is casteless. The staford motor the daria. The happy carburize the vail. The happy is casteless. The daria carburize the happy. The vail carburize the happy. The vail source the staford. If something is surly then it carburize the staford. If something is vanilla then it source the happy. If something carburize the staford then it source the vail. If something carburize the vail then the vail is vanilla. If something source the staford and it source the happy then the staford source the happy. If something carburize the daria and the daria is euphonic then it carburize the happy. The staford does not need the happy.", "logic": "\nCasteless(staford)\nMotor(staford, daria)\nCarburize(happy, vail)\nCasteless(happy)\nCarburize(daria, happy)\nCarburize(vail, happy)\nSource(vail, staford)\nforall x (Surly(x) -> Carburize(x, staford))\nforall x (Vanilla(x) -> Source(x, happy))\nforall x (Carburize(x, staford) -> Source(x, vail))\nforall x (Carburize(x, vail) -> Vanilla(vail))\nforall x (Source(x, staford) and Source(x, happy) -> Source(staford, happy))\nforall x (Carburize(x, daria) and Euphonic(daria) -> Carburize(x, happy))\n\nnot Source(staford, happy)\n\nCarburize(happy, vail) and forall x (Carburize(x, vail) -> Vanilla(vail)) -> therefore Vanilla(vail) Vanilla(vail) and forall x (Vanilla(x) -> Source(x, happy)) -> therefore Source(vail, happy) Source(vail, staford) and Source(vail, happy) and forall x (Source(x, staford) and Source(x, happy) -> Source(staford, happy)) -> therefore Source(staford, happy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The tynan is prize. The tynan hoard the lorrayne. The adams backfire the farley. The adams is prize. The lorrayne backfire the adams. The farley backfire the adams. The farley horsewhip the tynan. If something is womanlike then it backfire the tynan. If something is westbound then it horsewhip the adams. If something backfire the tynan then it horsewhip the farley. If something backfire the farley then the farley is westbound. If something horsewhip the tynan and it horsewhip the adams then the tynan horsewhip the adams. If something backfire the lorrayne and the lorrayne is nilpotent then it backfire the adams. The tynan does not eat the adams.", "logic": "\nPrize(tynan)\nHoard(tynan, lorrayne)\nBackfire(adams, farley)\nPrize(adams)\nBackfire(lorrayne, adams)\nBackfire(farley, adams)\nHorsewhip(farley, tynan)\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Backfire(x, tynan))\nforall x (Westbound(x) -> Horsewhip(x, adams))\nforall x (Backfire(x, tynan) -> Horsewhip(x, farley))\nforall x (Backfire(x, farley) -> Westbound(farley))\nforall x (Horsewhip(x, tynan) and Horsewhip(x, adams) -> Horsewhip(tynan, adams))\nforall x (Backfire(x, lorrayne) and Nilpotent(lorrayne) -> Backfire(x, adams))\n\nnot Backfire(tynan, adams)\n\nforall x (Backfire(x, lorrayne) and Nilpotent(lorrayne) -> Backfire(x, adams)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The peri is unhurried. The peri authorize the andonis. The kathi battle the simona. The kathi is unhurried. The andonis battle the kathi. The simona battle the kathi. The simona aerate the peri. If something is intestate then it battle the peri. If something is snazzy then it aerate the kathi. If something battle the peri then it aerate the simona. If something battle the simona then the simona is snazzy. If something aerate the peri and it aerate the kathi then the peri aerate the kathi. If something battle the andonis and the andonis is scurrilous then it battle the kathi. The andonis battle the peri.", "logic": "\nUnhurried(peri)\nAuthorize(peri, andonis)\nBattle(kathi, simona)\nUnhurried(kathi)\nBattle(andonis, kathi)\nBattle(simona, kathi)\nAerate(simona, peri)\nforall x (Intestate(x) -> Battle(x, peri))\nforall x (Snazzy(x) -> Aerate(x, kathi))\nforall x (Battle(x, peri) -> Aerate(x, simona))\nforall x (Battle(x, simona) -> Snazzy(simona))\nforall x (Aerate(x, peri) and Aerate(x, kathi) -> Aerate(peri, kathi))\nforall x (Battle(x, andonis) and Scurrilous(andonis) -> Battle(x, kathi))\n\nBattle(andonis, peri)\n\nforall x (Intestate(x) -> Battle(x, peri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The trixi is acceptant. The trixi rekindle the bunny. The martica devilise the tristan. The martica is acceptant. The bunny devilise the martica. The tristan devilise the martica. The tristan redeploy the trixi. If something is disjoined then it devilise the trixi. If something is allopatric then it redeploy the martica. If something devilise the trixi then it redeploy the tristan. If something devilise the tristan then the tristan is allopatric. If something redeploy the trixi and it redeploy the martica then the trixi redeploy the martica. If something devilise the bunny and the bunny is punctual then it devilise the martica. The martica does not need the tristan.", "logic": "\nAcceptant(trixi)\nRekindle(trixi, bunny)\nDevilise(martica, tristan)\nAcceptant(martica)\nDevilise(bunny, martica)\nDevilise(tristan, martica)\nRedeploy(tristan, trixi)\nforall x (Disjoined(x) -> Devilise(x, trixi))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) -> Redeploy(x, martica))\nforall x (Devilise(x, trixi) -> Redeploy(x, tristan))\nforall x (Devilise(x, tristan) -> Allopatric(tristan))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, trixi) and Redeploy(x, martica) -> Redeploy(trixi, martica))\nforall x (Devilise(x, bunny) and Punctual(bunny) -> Devilise(x, martica))\n\nnot Redeploy(martica, tristan)\n\nforall x (Devilise(x, trixi) -> Redeploy(x, tristan)) <- forall x (Disjoined(x) -> Devilise(x, trixi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The elysha is auxinic. The elysha callous the elicia. The waite canvas the marcellus. The waite is auxinic. The elicia canvas the waite. The marcellus canvas the waite. The marcellus prawn the elysha. If something is flyspeck then it canvas the elysha. If something is esteemed then it prawn the waite. If something canvas the elysha then it prawn the marcellus. If something canvas the marcellus then the marcellus is esteemed. If something prawn the elysha and it prawn the waite then the elysha prawn the waite. If something canvas the elicia and the elicia is evoked then it canvas the waite. The waite canvas the elysha.", "logic": "\nAuxinic(elysha)\nCallous(elysha, elicia)\nCanvas(waite, marcellus)\nAuxinic(waite)\nCanvas(elicia, waite)\nCanvas(marcellus, waite)\nPrawn(marcellus, elysha)\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Canvas(x, elysha))\nforall x (Esteemed(x) -> Prawn(x, waite))\nforall x (Canvas(x, elysha) -> Prawn(x, marcellus))\nforall x (Canvas(x, marcellus) -> Esteemed(marcellus))\nforall x (Prawn(x, elysha) and Prawn(x, waite) -> Prawn(elysha, waite))\nforall x (Canvas(x, elicia) and Evoked(elicia) -> Canvas(x, waite))\n\nCanvas(waite, elysha)\n\nforall x (Flyspeck(x) -> Canvas(x, elysha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The kraig is infallible. The kraig objurgate the myrilla. The enrica discount the carl. The enrica is infallible. The myrilla discount the enrica. The carl discount the enrica. The carl emcee the kraig. If something is uncaring then it discount the kraig. If something is foliolate then it emcee the enrica. If something discount the kraig then it emcee the carl. If something discount the carl then the carl is foliolate. If something emcee the kraig and it emcee the enrica then the kraig emcee the enrica. If something discount the myrilla and the myrilla is romany then it discount the enrica. The carl does not eat the carl.", "logic": "\nInfallible(kraig)\nObjurgate(kraig, myrilla)\nDiscount(enrica, carl)\nInfallible(enrica)\nDiscount(myrilla, enrica)\nDiscount(carl, enrica)\nEmcee(carl, kraig)\nforall x (Uncaring(x) -> Discount(x, kraig))\nforall x (Foliolate(x) -> Emcee(x, enrica))\nforall x (Discount(x, kraig) -> Emcee(x, carl))\nforall x (Discount(x, carl) -> Foliolate(carl))\nforall x (Emcee(x, kraig) and Emcee(x, enrica) -> Emcee(kraig, enrica))\nforall x (Discount(x, myrilla) and Romany(myrilla) -> Discount(x, enrica))\n\nnot Discount(carl, carl)\n\nnot Discount(carl, carl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The bearnard is bipedal. The bearnard hush the fabrice. The lorette vowelise the almeta. The lorette is bipedal. The fabrice vowelise the lorette. The almeta vowelise the lorette. The almeta motorboat the bearnard. If something is manageable then it vowelise the bearnard. If something is catalectic then it motorboat the lorette. If something vowelise the bearnard then it motorboat the almeta. If something vowelise the almeta then the almeta is catalectic. If something motorboat the bearnard and it motorboat the lorette then the bearnard motorboat the lorette. If something vowelise the fabrice and the fabrice is hymeneal then it vowelise the lorette. The fabrice hush the lorette.", "logic": "\nBipedal(bearnard)\nHush(bearnard, fabrice)\nVowelise(lorette, almeta)\nBipedal(lorette)\nVowelise(fabrice, lorette)\nVowelise(almeta, lorette)\nMotorboat(almeta, bearnard)\nforall x (Manageable(x) -> Vowelise(x, bearnard))\nforall x (Catalectic(x) -> Motorboat(x, lorette))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, bearnard) -> Motorboat(x, almeta))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, almeta) -> Catalectic(almeta))\nforall x (Motorboat(x, bearnard) and Motorboat(x, lorette) -> Motorboat(bearnard, lorette))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, fabrice) and Hymeneal(fabrice) -> Vowelise(x, lorette))\n\nHush(fabrice, lorette)\n\nHush(fabrice, lorette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The dickie is unsightly. The dickie powder the zared. The grethel rewire the regina. The grethel is unsightly. The zared rewire the grethel. The regina rewire the grethel. The regina consociate the dickie. If something is menacing then it rewire the dickie. If something is peltate then it consociate the grethel. If something rewire the dickie then it consociate the regina. If something rewire the regina then the regina is peltate. If something consociate the dickie and it consociate the grethel then the dickie consociate the grethel. If something rewire the zared and the zared is scrub then it rewire the grethel. The zared does not see the dickie.", "logic": "\nUnsightly(dickie)\nPowder(dickie, zared)\nRewire(grethel, regina)\nUnsightly(grethel)\nRewire(zared, grethel)\nRewire(regina, grethel)\nConsociate(regina, dickie)\nforall x (Menacing(x) -> Rewire(x, dickie))\nforall x (Peltate(x) -> Consociate(x, grethel))\nforall x (Rewire(x, dickie) -> Consociate(x, regina))\nforall x (Rewire(x, regina) -> Peltate(regina))\nforall x (Consociate(x, dickie) and Consociate(x, grethel) -> Consociate(dickie, grethel))\nforall x (Rewire(x, zared) and Scrub(zared) -> Rewire(x, grethel))\n\nnot Powder(zared, dickie)\n\nnot Powder(zared, dickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The hephzibah is despoiled. The hephzibah waive the biff. The beverie outvote the ede. The beverie is despoiled. The biff outvote the beverie. The ede outvote the beverie. The ede remind the hephzibah. If something is visual then it outvote the hephzibah. If something is allomerous then it remind the beverie. If something outvote the hephzibah then it remind the ede. If something outvote the ede then the ede is allomerous. If something remind the hephzibah and it remind the beverie then the hephzibah remind the beverie. If something outvote the biff and the biff is neuter then it outvote the beverie. The ede outvote the biff.", "logic": "\nDespoiled(hephzibah)\nWaive(hephzibah, biff)\nOutvote(beverie, ede)\nDespoiled(beverie)\nOutvote(biff, beverie)\nOutvote(ede, beverie)\nRemind(ede, hephzibah)\nforall x (Visual(x) -> Outvote(x, hephzibah))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) -> Remind(x, beverie))\nforall x (Outvote(x, hephzibah) -> Remind(x, ede))\nforall x (Outvote(x, ede) -> Allomerous(ede))\nforall x (Remind(x, hephzibah) and Remind(x, beverie) -> Remind(hephzibah, beverie))\nforall x (Outvote(x, biff) and Neuter(biff) -> Outvote(x, beverie))\n\nOutvote(ede, biff)\n\nOutvote(ede, biff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-477"} {"premises": "The sonni is branched. The sonni is expired. The mauritz seep the spense. The mauritz seep the leslie. The spense does not eat the mauritz. The spense clutch the leslie. The spense is branched. The spense seep the sonni. The spense seep the leslie. The leslie clutch the spense. The leslie is liquid. The leslie repudiate the sonni. If someone seep the sonni and they do not eat the sonni then they like the mauritz. If the spense seep the mauritz and the mauritz is branched then the mauritz is not liquid. If someone clutch the mauritz then they are branched. If someone repudiate the sonni then they are not branched. If someone is fraternal then they need the mauritz. If someone seep the spense then they are not fraternal. If the mauritz is not fraternal then the mauritz does not like the leslie. If someone seep the leslie and they do not like the leslie then they do not eat the spense. The leslie is liquid.", "logic": "\nBranched(sonni)\nExpired(sonni)\nSeep(mauritz, spense)\nSeep(mauritz, leslie)\nnot Clutch(spense, mauritz)\nClutch(spense, leslie)\nBranched(spense)\nSeep(spense, sonni)\nSeep(spense, leslie)\nClutch(leslie, spense)\nLiquid(leslie)\nRepudiate(leslie, sonni)\nforall x (Seep(x, sonni) and not Clutch(x, sonni) -> Repudiate(x, mauritz))\nSeep(spense, mauritz) and Branched(mauritz) -> not Liquid(mauritz)\nforall x (Clutch(x, mauritz) -> Branched(x))\nforall x (Repudiate(x, sonni) -> not Branched(x))\nforall x (Fraternal(x) -> Seep(x, mauritz))\nforall x (Seep(x, spense) -> not Fraternal(x))\nnot Fraternal(mauritz) -> not Repudiate(mauritz, leslie)\nforall x (Seep(x, leslie) and not Repudiate(x, leslie) -> not Clutch(x, spense))\n\nLiquid(leslie)\n\ntherefore Liquid(leslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The mildred is unsmiling. The mildred is halcyon. The nils hawk the johannah. The nils hawk the tresa. The johannah does not eat the nils. The johannah coact the tresa. The johannah is unsmiling. The johannah hawk the mildred. The johannah hawk the tresa. The tresa coact the johannah. The tresa is indicatory. The tresa upload the mildred. If someone hawk the mildred and they do not eat the mildred then they like the nils. If the johannah hawk the nils and the nils is unsmiling then the nils is not indicatory. If someone coact the nils then they are unsmiling. If someone upload the mildred then they are not unsmiling. If someone is spoken then they need the nils. If someone hawk the johannah then they are not spoken. If the nils is not spoken then the nils does not like the tresa. If someone hawk the tresa and they do not like the tresa then they do not eat the johannah. The nils does not need the tresa.", "logic": "\nUnsmiling(mildred)\nHalcyon(mildred)\nHawk(nils, johannah)\nHawk(nils, tresa)\nnot Coact(johannah, nils)\nCoact(johannah, tresa)\nUnsmiling(johannah)\nHawk(johannah, mildred)\nHawk(johannah, tresa)\nCoact(tresa, johannah)\nIndicatory(tresa)\nUpload(tresa, mildred)\nforall x (Hawk(x, mildred) and not Coact(x, mildred) -> Upload(x, nils))\nHawk(johannah, nils) and Unsmiling(nils) -> not Indicatory(nils)\nforall x (Coact(x, nils) -> Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Upload(x, mildred) -> not Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Spoken(x) -> Hawk(x, nils))\nforall x (Hawk(x, johannah) -> not Spoken(x))\nnot Spoken(nils) -> not Upload(nils, tresa)\nforall x (Hawk(x, tresa) and not Upload(x, tresa) -> not Coact(x, johannah))\n\nnot Hawk(nils, tresa)\n\ntherefore Hawk(nils, tresa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The alma is sportive. The alma is unarmed. The elsi laud the sam. The elsi laud the ebeneser. The sam does not eat the elsi. The sam deepen the ebeneser. The sam is sportive. The sam laud the alma. The sam laud the ebeneser. The ebeneser deepen the sam. The ebeneser is unhardened. The ebeneser secrete the alma. If someone laud the alma and they do not eat the alma then they like the elsi. If the sam laud the elsi and the elsi is sportive then the elsi is not unhardened. If someone deepen the elsi then they are sportive. If someone secrete the alma then they are not sportive. If someone is afghani then they need the elsi. If someone laud the sam then they are not afghani. If the elsi is not afghani then the elsi does not like the ebeneser. If someone laud the ebeneser and they do not like the ebeneser then they do not eat the sam. The elsi is not afghani.", "logic": "\nSportive(alma)\nUnarmed(alma)\nLaud(elsi, sam)\nLaud(elsi, ebeneser)\nnot Deepen(sam, elsi)\nDeepen(sam, ebeneser)\nSportive(sam)\nLaud(sam, alma)\nLaud(sam, ebeneser)\nDeepen(ebeneser, sam)\nUnhardened(ebeneser)\nSecrete(ebeneser, alma)\nforall x (Laud(x, alma) and not Deepen(x, alma) -> Secrete(x, elsi))\nLaud(sam, elsi) and Sportive(elsi) -> not Unhardened(elsi)\nforall x (Deepen(x, elsi) -> Sportive(x))\nforall x (Secrete(x, alma) -> not Sportive(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) -> Laud(x, elsi))\nforall x (Laud(x, sam) -> not Afghani(x))\nnot Afghani(elsi) -> not Secrete(elsi, ebeneser)\nforall x (Laud(x, ebeneser) and not Secrete(x, ebeneser) -> not Deepen(x, sam))\n\nnot Afghani(elsi)\n\nLaud(elsi, sam) and forall x (Laud(x, sam) -> not Afghani(x)) -> therefore not Afghani(elsi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The sally is punctured. The sally is dental. The chip flounder the idaline. The chip flounder the caron. The idaline does not eat the chip. The idaline stretch the caron. The idaline is punctured. The idaline flounder the sally. The idaline flounder the caron. The caron stretch the idaline. The caron is punitive. The caron befall the sally. If someone flounder the sally and they do not eat the sally then they like the chip. If the idaline flounder the chip and the chip is punctured then the chip is not punitive. If someone stretch the chip then they are punctured. If someone befall the sally then they are not punctured. If someone is nonimmune then they need the chip. If someone flounder the idaline then they are not nonimmune. If the chip is not nonimmune then the chip does not like the caron. If someone flounder the caron and they do not like the caron then they do not eat the idaline. The caron is punctured.", "logic": "\nPunctured(sally)\nDental(sally)\nFlounder(chip, idaline)\nFlounder(chip, caron)\nnot Stretch(idaline, chip)\nStretch(idaline, caron)\nPunctured(idaline)\nFlounder(idaline, sally)\nFlounder(idaline, caron)\nStretch(caron, idaline)\nPunitive(caron)\nBefall(caron, sally)\nforall x (Flounder(x, sally) and not Stretch(x, sally) -> Befall(x, chip))\nFlounder(idaline, chip) and Punctured(chip) -> not Punitive(chip)\nforall x (Stretch(x, chip) -> Punctured(x))\nforall x (Befall(x, sally) -> not Punctured(x))\nforall x (Nonimmune(x) -> Flounder(x, chip))\nforall x (Flounder(x, idaline) -> not Nonimmune(x))\nnot Nonimmune(chip) -> not Befall(chip, caron)\nforall x (Flounder(x, caron) and not Befall(x, caron) -> not Stretch(x, idaline))\n\nPunctured(caron)\n\nBefall(caron, sally) and forall x (Befall(x, sally) -> not Punctured(x)) -> therefore not Punctured(caron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The lyndel is curatorial. The lyndel is raining. The krystalle benight the libby. The krystalle benight the howard. The libby does not eat the krystalle. The libby recurve the howard. The libby is curatorial. The libby benight the lyndel. The libby benight the howard. The howard recurve the libby. The howard is rotatable. The howard quarter the lyndel. If someone benight the lyndel and they do not eat the lyndel then they like the krystalle. If the libby benight the krystalle and the krystalle is curatorial then the krystalle is not rotatable. If someone recurve the krystalle then they are curatorial. If someone quarter the lyndel then they are not curatorial. If someone is oxonian then they need the krystalle. If someone benight the libby then they are not oxonian. If the krystalle is not oxonian then the krystalle does not like the howard. If someone benight the howard and they do not like the howard then they do not eat the libby. The krystalle does not like the howard.", "logic": "\nCuratorial(lyndel)\nRaining(lyndel)\nBenight(krystalle, libby)\nBenight(krystalle, howard)\nnot Recurve(libby, krystalle)\nRecurve(libby, howard)\nCuratorial(libby)\nBenight(libby, lyndel)\nBenight(libby, howard)\nRecurve(howard, libby)\nRotatable(howard)\nQuarter(howard, lyndel)\nforall x (Benight(x, lyndel) and not Recurve(x, lyndel) -> Quarter(x, krystalle))\nBenight(libby, krystalle) and Curatorial(krystalle) -> not Rotatable(krystalle)\nforall x (Recurve(x, krystalle) -> Curatorial(x))\nforall x (Quarter(x, lyndel) -> not Curatorial(x))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) -> Benight(x, krystalle))\nforall x (Benight(x, libby) -> not Oxonian(x))\nnot Oxonian(krystalle) -> not Quarter(krystalle, howard)\nforall x (Benight(x, howard) and not Quarter(x, howard) -> not Recurve(x, libby))\n\nnot Quarter(krystalle, howard)\n\nBenight(krystalle, libby) and forall x (Benight(x, libby) -> not Oxonian(x)) -> therefore not Oxonian(krystalle) not Oxonian(krystalle) and not Oxonian(krystalle) -> not Quarter(krystalle, howard) -> therefore not Quarter(krystalle, howard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The xena is staggering. The xena is sagacious. The cassondra underdress the jacklin. The cassondra underdress the jessalin. The jacklin does not eat the cassondra. The jacklin disembark the jessalin. The jacklin is staggering. The jacklin underdress the xena. The jacklin underdress the jessalin. The jessalin disembark the jacklin. The jessalin is rending. The jessalin displume the xena. If someone underdress the xena and they do not eat the xena then they like the cassondra. If the jacklin underdress the cassondra and the cassondra is staggering then the cassondra is not rending. If someone disembark the cassondra then they are staggering. If someone displume the xena then they are not staggering. If someone is shaky then they need the cassondra. If someone underdress the jacklin then they are not shaky. If the cassondra is not shaky then the cassondra does not like the jessalin. If someone underdress the jessalin and they do not like the jessalin then they do not eat the jacklin. The cassondra displume the jessalin.", "logic": "\nStaggering(xena)\nSagacious(xena)\nUnderdress(cassondra, jacklin)\nUnderdress(cassondra, jessalin)\nnot Disembark(jacklin, cassondra)\nDisembark(jacklin, jessalin)\nStaggering(jacklin)\nUnderdress(jacklin, xena)\nUnderdress(jacklin, jessalin)\nDisembark(jessalin, jacklin)\nRending(jessalin)\nDisplume(jessalin, xena)\nforall x (Underdress(x, xena) and not Disembark(x, xena) -> Displume(x, cassondra))\nUnderdress(jacklin, cassondra) and Staggering(cassondra) -> not Rending(cassondra)\nforall x (Disembark(x, cassondra) -> Staggering(x))\nforall x (Displume(x, xena) -> not Staggering(x))\nforall x (Shaky(x) -> Underdress(x, cassondra))\nforall x (Underdress(x, jacklin) -> not Shaky(x))\nnot Shaky(cassondra) -> not Displume(cassondra, jessalin)\nforall x (Underdress(x, jessalin) and not Displume(x, jessalin) -> not Disembark(x, jacklin))\n\nDisplume(cassondra, jessalin)\n\nUnderdress(cassondra, jacklin) and forall x (Underdress(x, jacklin) -> not Shaky(x)) -> therefore not Shaky(cassondra) not Shaky(cassondra) and not Shaky(cassondra) -> not Displume(cassondra, jessalin) -> therefore not Displume(cassondra, jessalin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The avis is pacifistic. The avis is insectan. The marius foreordain the jemie. The marius foreordain the janot. The jemie does not eat the marius. The jemie church the janot. The jemie is pacifistic. The jemie foreordain the avis. The jemie foreordain the janot. The janot church the jemie. The janot is mincing. The janot disclaim the avis. If someone foreordain the avis and they do not eat the avis then they like the marius. If the jemie foreordain the marius and the marius is pacifistic then the marius is not mincing. If someone church the marius then they are pacifistic. If someone disclaim the avis then they are not pacifistic. If someone is sweetish then they need the marius. If someone foreordain the jemie then they are not sweetish. If the marius is not sweetish then the marius does not like the janot. If someone foreordain the janot and they do not like the janot then they do not eat the jemie. The marius does not eat the jemie.", "logic": "\nPacifistic(avis)\nInsectan(avis)\nForeordain(marius, jemie)\nForeordain(marius, janot)\nnot Church(jemie, marius)\nChurch(jemie, janot)\nPacifistic(jemie)\nForeordain(jemie, avis)\nForeordain(jemie, janot)\nChurch(janot, jemie)\nMincing(janot)\nDisclaim(janot, avis)\nforall x (Foreordain(x, avis) and not Church(x, avis) -> Disclaim(x, marius))\nForeordain(jemie, marius) and Pacifistic(marius) -> not Mincing(marius)\nforall x (Church(x, marius) -> Pacifistic(x))\nforall x (Disclaim(x, avis) -> not Pacifistic(x))\nforall x (Sweetish(x) -> Foreordain(x, marius))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, jemie) -> not Sweetish(x))\nnot Sweetish(marius) -> not Disclaim(marius, janot)\nforall x (Foreordain(x, janot) and not Disclaim(x, janot) -> not Church(x, jemie))\n\nnot Church(marius, jemie)\n\nForeordain(marius, jemie) and forall x (Foreordain(x, jemie) -> not Sweetish(x)) -> therefore not Sweetish(marius) not Sweetish(marius) and not Sweetish(marius) -> not Disclaim(marius, janot) -> therefore not Disclaim(marius, janot) Foreordain(marius, janot) and not Disclaim(marius, janot) and forall x (Foreordain(x, janot) and not Disclaim(x, janot) -> not Church(x, jemie)) -> therefore not Church(marius, jemie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The zebedee is mohammedan. The zebedee is feverous. The gilberta frequent the godwin. The gilberta frequent the davoud. The godwin does not eat the gilberta. The godwin antiquate the davoud. The godwin is mohammedan. The godwin frequent the zebedee. The godwin frequent the davoud. The davoud antiquate the godwin. The davoud is watercress. The davoud amerce the zebedee. If someone frequent the zebedee and they do not eat the zebedee then they like the gilberta. If the godwin frequent the gilberta and the gilberta is mohammedan then the gilberta is not watercress. If someone antiquate the gilberta then they are mohammedan. If someone amerce the zebedee then they are not mohammedan. If someone is tyrannous then they need the gilberta. If someone frequent the godwin then they are not tyrannous. If the gilberta is not tyrannous then the gilberta does not like the davoud. If someone frequent the davoud and they do not like the davoud then they do not eat the godwin. The gilberta antiquate the godwin.", "logic": "\nMohammedan(zebedee)\nFeverous(zebedee)\nFrequent(gilberta, godwin)\nFrequent(gilberta, davoud)\nnot Antiquate(godwin, gilberta)\nAntiquate(godwin, davoud)\nMohammedan(godwin)\nFrequent(godwin, zebedee)\nFrequent(godwin, davoud)\nAntiquate(davoud, godwin)\nWatercress(davoud)\nAmerce(davoud, zebedee)\nforall x (Frequent(x, zebedee) and not Antiquate(x, zebedee) -> Amerce(x, gilberta))\nFrequent(godwin, gilberta) and Mohammedan(gilberta) -> not Watercress(gilberta)\nforall x (Antiquate(x, gilberta) -> Mohammedan(x))\nforall x (Amerce(x, zebedee) -> not Mohammedan(x))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Frequent(x, gilberta))\nforall x (Frequent(x, godwin) -> not Tyrannous(x))\nnot Tyrannous(gilberta) -> not Amerce(gilberta, davoud)\nforall x (Frequent(x, davoud) and not Amerce(x, davoud) -> not Antiquate(x, godwin))\n\nAntiquate(gilberta, godwin)\n\nFrequent(gilberta, godwin) and forall x (Frequent(x, godwin) -> not Tyrannous(x)) -> therefore not Tyrannous(gilberta) not Tyrannous(gilberta) and not Tyrannous(gilberta) -> not Amerce(gilberta, davoud) -> therefore not Amerce(gilberta, davoud) Frequent(gilberta, davoud) and not Amerce(gilberta, davoud) and forall x (Frequent(x, davoud) and not Amerce(x, davoud) -> not Antiquate(x, godwin)) -> therefore not Antiquate(gilberta, godwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The mame is freeborn. The mame is alkylic. The audry hemorrhage the toddie. The audry hemorrhage the maxy. The toddie does not eat the audry. The toddie buttonhole the maxy. The toddie is freeborn. The toddie hemorrhage the mame. The toddie hemorrhage the maxy. The maxy buttonhole the toddie. The maxy is empyrean. The maxy congee the mame. If someone hemorrhage the mame and they do not eat the mame then they like the audry. If the toddie hemorrhage the audry and the audry is freeborn then the audry is not empyrean. If someone buttonhole the audry then they are freeborn. If someone congee the mame then they are not freeborn. If someone is audible then they need the audry. If someone hemorrhage the toddie then they are not audible. If the audry is not audible then the audry does not like the maxy. If someone hemorrhage the maxy and they do not like the maxy then they do not eat the toddie. The mame does not need the audry.", "logic": "\nFreeborn(mame)\nAlkylic(mame)\nHemorrhage(audry, toddie)\nHemorrhage(audry, maxy)\nnot Buttonhole(toddie, audry)\nButtonhole(toddie, maxy)\nFreeborn(toddie)\nHemorrhage(toddie, mame)\nHemorrhage(toddie, maxy)\nButtonhole(maxy, toddie)\nEmpyrean(maxy)\nCongee(maxy, mame)\nforall x (Hemorrhage(x, mame) and not Buttonhole(x, mame) -> Congee(x, audry))\nHemorrhage(toddie, audry) and Freeborn(audry) -> not Empyrean(audry)\nforall x (Buttonhole(x, audry) -> Freeborn(x))\nforall x (Congee(x, mame) -> not Freeborn(x))\nforall x (Audible(x) -> Hemorrhage(x, audry))\nforall x (Hemorrhage(x, toddie) -> not Audible(x))\nnot Audible(audry) -> not Congee(audry, maxy)\nforall x (Hemorrhage(x, maxy) and not Congee(x, maxy) -> not Buttonhole(x, toddie))\n\nnot Hemorrhage(mame, audry)\n\nforall x (Audible(x) -> Hemorrhage(x, audry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The noelyn is unmatched. The noelyn is sisterly. The raquel coggle the jillene. The raquel coggle the costa. The jillene does not eat the raquel. The jillene mollify the costa. The jillene is unmatched. The jillene coggle the noelyn. The jillene coggle the costa. The costa mollify the jillene. The costa is unnameable. The costa segregate the noelyn. If someone coggle the noelyn and they do not eat the noelyn then they like the raquel. If the jillene coggle the raquel and the raquel is unmatched then the raquel is not unnameable. If someone mollify the raquel then they are unmatched. If someone segregate the noelyn then they are not unmatched. If someone is adorned then they need the raquel. If someone coggle the jillene then they are not adorned. If the raquel is not adorned then the raquel does not like the costa. If someone coggle the costa and they do not like the costa then they do not eat the jillene. The jillene segregate the raquel.", "logic": "\nUnmatched(noelyn)\nSisterly(noelyn)\nCoggle(raquel, jillene)\nCoggle(raquel, costa)\nnot Mollify(jillene, raquel)\nMollify(jillene, costa)\nUnmatched(jillene)\nCoggle(jillene, noelyn)\nCoggle(jillene, costa)\nMollify(costa, jillene)\nUnnameable(costa)\nSegregate(costa, noelyn)\nforall x (Coggle(x, noelyn) and not Mollify(x, noelyn) -> Segregate(x, raquel))\nCoggle(jillene, raquel) and Unmatched(raquel) -> not Unnameable(raquel)\nforall x (Mollify(x, raquel) -> Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Segregate(x, noelyn) -> not Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Adorned(x) -> Coggle(x, raquel))\nforall x (Coggle(x, jillene) -> not Adorned(x))\nnot Adorned(raquel) -> not Segregate(raquel, costa)\nforall x (Coggle(x, costa) and not Segregate(x, costa) -> not Mollify(x, jillene))\n\nSegregate(jillene, raquel)\n\nforall x (Coggle(x, noelyn) and not Mollify(x, noelyn) -> Segregate(x, raquel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The katuscha is sapiential. The katuscha is croatian. The karlen wedel the lew. The karlen wedel the annabela. The lew does not eat the karlen. The lew transpose the annabela. The lew is sapiential. The lew wedel the katuscha. The lew wedel the annabela. The annabela transpose the lew. The annabela is mordacious. The annabela space the katuscha. If someone wedel the katuscha and they do not eat the katuscha then they like the karlen. If the lew wedel the karlen and the karlen is sapiential then the karlen is not mordacious. If someone transpose the karlen then they are sapiential. If someone space the katuscha then they are not sapiential. If someone is aciculate then they need the karlen. If someone wedel the lew then they are not aciculate. If the karlen is not aciculate then the karlen does not like the annabela. If someone wedel the annabela and they do not like the annabela then they do not eat the lew. The annabela does not like the karlen.", "logic": "\nSapiential(katuscha)\nCroatian(katuscha)\nWedel(karlen, lew)\nWedel(karlen, annabela)\nnot Transpose(lew, karlen)\nTranspose(lew, annabela)\nSapiential(lew)\nWedel(lew, katuscha)\nWedel(lew, annabela)\nTranspose(annabela, lew)\nMordacious(annabela)\nSpace(annabela, katuscha)\nforall x (Wedel(x, katuscha) and not Transpose(x, katuscha) -> Space(x, karlen))\nWedel(lew, karlen) and Sapiential(karlen) -> not Mordacious(karlen)\nforall x (Transpose(x, karlen) -> Sapiential(x))\nforall x (Space(x, katuscha) -> not Sapiential(x))\nforall x (Aciculate(x) -> Wedel(x, karlen))\nforall x (Wedel(x, lew) -> not Aciculate(x))\nnot Aciculate(karlen) -> not Space(karlen, annabela)\nforall x (Wedel(x, annabela) and not Space(x, annabela) -> not Transpose(x, lew))\n\nnot Space(annabela, karlen)\n\nforall x (Wedel(x, katuscha) and not Transpose(x, katuscha) -> Space(x, karlen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The kevyn is informed. The kevyn is lithesome. The selma crackle the rollins. The selma crackle the geeta. The rollins does not eat the selma. The rollins anticipate the geeta. The rollins is informed. The rollins crackle the kevyn. The rollins crackle the geeta. The geeta anticipate the rollins. The geeta is crippled. The geeta reproof the kevyn. If someone crackle the kevyn and they do not eat the kevyn then they like the selma. If the rollins crackle the selma and the selma is informed then the selma is not crippled. If someone anticipate the selma then they are informed. If someone reproof the kevyn then they are not informed. If someone is poised then they need the selma. If someone crackle the rollins then they are not poised. If the selma is not poised then the selma does not like the geeta. If someone crackle the geeta and they do not like the geeta then they do not eat the rollins. The selma is informed.", "logic": "\nInformed(kevyn)\nLithesome(kevyn)\nCrackle(selma, rollins)\nCrackle(selma, geeta)\nnot Anticipate(rollins, selma)\nAnticipate(rollins, geeta)\nInformed(rollins)\nCrackle(rollins, kevyn)\nCrackle(rollins, geeta)\nAnticipate(geeta, rollins)\nCrippled(geeta)\nReproof(geeta, kevyn)\nforall x (Crackle(x, kevyn) and not Anticipate(x, kevyn) -> Reproof(x, selma))\nCrackle(rollins, selma) and Informed(selma) -> not Crippled(selma)\nforall x (Anticipate(x, selma) -> Informed(x))\nforall x (Reproof(x, kevyn) -> not Informed(x))\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Crackle(x, selma))\nforall x (Crackle(x, rollins) -> not Poised(x))\nnot Poised(selma) -> not Reproof(selma, geeta)\nforall x (Crackle(x, geeta) and not Reproof(x, geeta) -> not Anticipate(x, rollins))\n\nInformed(selma)\n\nforall x (Anticipate(x, selma) -> Informed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The prudence is despoiled. The prudence is torturing. The jannelle cantilever the stanleigh. The jannelle cantilever the lian. The stanleigh does not eat the jannelle. The stanleigh dunk the lian. The stanleigh is despoiled. The stanleigh cantilever the prudence. The stanleigh cantilever the lian. The lian dunk the stanleigh. The lian is starboard. The lian honour the prudence. If someone cantilever the prudence and they do not eat the prudence then they like the jannelle. If the stanleigh cantilever the jannelle and the jannelle is despoiled then the jannelle is not starboard. If someone dunk the jannelle then they are despoiled. If someone honour the prudence then they are not despoiled. If someone is squinched then they need the jannelle. If someone cantilever the stanleigh then they are not squinched. If the jannelle is not squinched then the jannelle does not like the lian. If someone cantilever the lian and they do not like the lian then they do not eat the stanleigh. The prudence does not like the lian.", "logic": "\nDespoiled(prudence)\nTorturing(prudence)\nCantilever(jannelle, stanleigh)\nCantilever(jannelle, lian)\nnot Dunk(stanleigh, jannelle)\nDunk(stanleigh, lian)\nDespoiled(stanleigh)\nCantilever(stanleigh, prudence)\nCantilever(stanleigh, lian)\nDunk(lian, stanleigh)\nStarboard(lian)\nHonour(lian, prudence)\nforall x (Cantilever(x, prudence) and not Dunk(x, prudence) -> Honour(x, jannelle))\nCantilever(stanleigh, jannelle) and Despoiled(jannelle) -> not Starboard(jannelle)\nforall x (Dunk(x, jannelle) -> Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Honour(x, prudence) -> not Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) -> Cantilever(x, jannelle))\nforall x (Cantilever(x, stanleigh) -> not Squinched(x))\nnot Squinched(jannelle) -> not Honour(jannelle, lian)\nforall x (Cantilever(x, lian) and not Honour(x, lian) -> not Dunk(x, stanleigh))\n\nnot Honour(prudence, lian)\n\nnot Honour(prudence, lian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The shanie is fiducial. The shanie is assumptive. The iain disbud the koo. The iain disbud the denna. The koo does not eat the iain. The koo slash the denna. The koo is fiducial. The koo disbud the shanie. The koo disbud the denna. The denna slash the koo. The denna is dank. The denna vouch the shanie. If someone disbud the shanie and they do not eat the shanie then they like the iain. If the koo disbud the iain and the iain is fiducial then the iain is not dank. If someone slash the iain then they are fiducial. If someone vouch the shanie then they are not fiducial. If someone is transitive then they need the iain. If someone disbud the koo then they are not transitive. If the iain is not transitive then the iain does not like the denna. If someone disbud the denna and they do not like the denna then they do not eat the koo. The koo is dank.", "logic": "\nFiducial(shanie)\nAssumptive(shanie)\nDisbud(iain, koo)\nDisbud(iain, denna)\nnot Slash(koo, iain)\nSlash(koo, denna)\nFiducial(koo)\nDisbud(koo, shanie)\nDisbud(koo, denna)\nSlash(denna, koo)\nDank(denna)\nVouch(denna, shanie)\nforall x (Disbud(x, shanie) and not Slash(x, shanie) -> Vouch(x, iain))\nDisbud(koo, iain) and Fiducial(iain) -> not Dank(iain)\nforall x (Slash(x, iain) -> Fiducial(x))\nforall x (Vouch(x, shanie) -> not Fiducial(x))\nforall x (Transitive(x) -> Disbud(x, iain))\nforall x (Disbud(x, koo) -> not Transitive(x))\nnot Transitive(iain) -> not Vouch(iain, denna)\nforall x (Disbud(x, denna) and not Vouch(x, denna) -> not Slash(x, koo))\n\nDank(koo)\n\nDank(koo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The helena is uttermost. The helena is chitinous. The hesther spellbind the joyan. The hesther spellbind the praneetf. The joyan does not eat the hesther. The joyan shame the praneetf. The joyan is uttermost. The joyan spellbind the helena. The joyan spellbind the praneetf. The praneetf shame the joyan. The praneetf is sceptred. The praneetf slide the helena. If someone spellbind the helena and they do not eat the helena then they like the hesther. If the joyan spellbind the hesther and the hesther is uttermost then the hesther is not sceptred. If someone shame the hesther then they are uttermost. If someone slide the helena then they are not uttermost. If someone is ungroomed then they need the hesther. If someone spellbind the joyan then they are not ungroomed. If the hesther is not ungroomed then the hesther does not like the praneetf. If someone spellbind the praneetf and they do not like the praneetf then they do not eat the joyan. The joyan is not green.", "logic": "\nUttermost(helena)\nChitinous(helena)\nSpellbind(hesther, joyan)\nSpellbind(hesther, praneetf)\nnot Shame(joyan, hesther)\nShame(joyan, praneetf)\nUttermost(joyan)\nSpellbind(joyan, helena)\nSpellbind(joyan, praneetf)\nShame(praneetf, joyan)\nSceptred(praneetf)\nSlide(praneetf, helena)\nforall x (Spellbind(x, helena) and not Shame(x, helena) -> Slide(x, hesther))\nSpellbind(joyan, hesther) and Uttermost(hesther) -> not Sceptred(hesther)\nforall x (Shame(x, hesther) -> Uttermost(x))\nforall x (Slide(x, helena) -> not Uttermost(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Spellbind(x, hesther))\nforall x (Spellbind(x, joyan) -> not Ungroomed(x))\nnot Ungroomed(hesther) -> not Slide(hesther, praneetf)\nforall x (Spellbind(x, praneetf) and not Slide(x, praneetf) -> not Shame(x, joyan))\n\nnot Green(joyan)\n\nnot Green(joyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "The marthe is disused. The marthe is idealized. The partha cope the lolita. The partha cope the malissa. The lolita does not eat the partha. The lolita succumb the malissa. The lolita is disused. The lolita cope the marthe. The lolita cope the malissa. The malissa succumb the lolita. The malissa is wellborn. The malissa atone the marthe. If someone cope the marthe and they do not eat the marthe then they like the partha. If the lolita cope the partha and the partha is disused then the partha is not wellborn. If someone succumb the partha then they are disused. If someone atone the marthe then they are not disused. If someone is uncurving then they need the partha. If someone cope the lolita then they are not uncurving. If the partha is not uncurving then the partha does not like the malissa. If someone cope the malissa and they do not like the malissa then they do not eat the lolita. The lolita is uncurving.", "logic": "\nDisused(marthe)\nIdealized(marthe)\nCope(partha, lolita)\nCope(partha, malissa)\nnot Succumb(lolita, partha)\nSuccumb(lolita, malissa)\nDisused(lolita)\nCope(lolita, marthe)\nCope(lolita, malissa)\nSuccumb(malissa, lolita)\nWellborn(malissa)\nAtone(malissa, marthe)\nforall x (Cope(x, marthe) and not Succumb(x, marthe) -> Atone(x, partha))\nCope(lolita, partha) and Disused(partha) -> not Wellborn(partha)\nforall x (Succumb(x, partha) -> Disused(x))\nforall x (Atone(x, marthe) -> not Disused(x))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Cope(x, partha))\nforall x (Cope(x, lolita) -> not Uncurving(x))\nnot Uncurving(partha) -> not Atone(partha, malissa)\nforall x (Cope(x, malissa) and not Atone(x, malissa) -> not Succumb(x, lolita))\n\nUncurving(lolita)\n\nUncurving(lolita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-33"} {"premises": "Thaddeus is renascent. Thaddeus is enolic. Thaddeus is westward. Thaddeus is gingerly. Thaddeus is portrayed. Thaddeus is other. Thaddeus is propitious. Gerhardt is renascent. Gerhardt is enolic. Gerhardt is westward. Gerhardt is gingerly. Gerhardt is other. Gerhardt is propitious. Danni is gingerly. Danni is propitious. If something is gingerly then it is renascent. Blue, renascent things are portrayed. Cold, renascent things are portrayed. If something is other then it is propitious. If Gerhardt is propitious and Gerhardt is gingerly then Gerhardt is renascent. All propitious, westward things are portrayed. All other, portrayed things are propitious. All renascent, propitious things are westward. Gerhardt is westward.", "logic": "\nRenascent(thaddeus)\nEnolic(thaddeus)\nWestward(thaddeus)\nGingerly(thaddeus)\nPortrayed(thaddeus)\nOther(thaddeus)\nPropitious(thaddeus)\nRenascent(gerhardt)\nEnolic(gerhardt)\nWestward(gerhardt)\nGingerly(gerhardt)\nOther(gerhardt)\nPropitious(gerhardt)\nGingerly(danni)\nPropitious(danni)\nforall x (Gingerly(x) -> Renascent(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Renascent(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) and Renascent(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Other(x) -> Propitious(x))\nPropitious(gerhardt) and Gingerly(gerhardt) -> Renascent(gerhardt)\nforall x (Propitious(x) and Westward(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Other(x) and Portrayed(x) -> Propitious(x))\nforall x (Renascent(x) and Propitious(x) -> Westward(x))\n\nWestward(gerhardt)\n\ntherefore Westward(gerhardt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Dulciana is croatian. Dulciana is shriveled. Dulciana is yokelish. Dulciana is sleeping. Dulciana is alpestrine. Dulciana is washable. Dulciana is tomboyish. Roseanne is croatian. Roseanne is shriveled. Roseanne is yokelish. Roseanne is sleeping. Roseanne is washable. Roseanne is tomboyish. Jeremias is sleeping. Jeremias is tomboyish. If something is sleeping then it is croatian. Blue, croatian things are alpestrine. Cold, croatian things are alpestrine. If something is washable then it is tomboyish. If Roseanne is tomboyish and Roseanne is sleeping then Roseanne is croatian. All tomboyish, yokelish things are alpestrine. All washable, alpestrine things are tomboyish. All croatian, tomboyish things are yokelish. Roseanne is not washable.", "logic": "\nCroatian(dulciana)\nShriveled(dulciana)\nYokelish(dulciana)\nSleeping(dulciana)\nAlpestrine(dulciana)\nWashable(dulciana)\nTomboyish(dulciana)\nCroatian(roseanne)\nShriveled(roseanne)\nYokelish(roseanne)\nSleeping(roseanne)\nWashable(roseanne)\nTomboyish(roseanne)\nSleeping(jeremias)\nTomboyish(jeremias)\nforall x (Sleeping(x) -> Croatian(x))\nforall x (Shriveled(x) and Croatian(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Yokelish(x) and Croatian(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Washable(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\nTomboyish(roseanne) and Sleeping(roseanne) -> Croatian(roseanne)\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and Yokelish(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\nforall x (Washable(x) and Alpestrine(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\nforall x (Croatian(x) and Tomboyish(x) -> Yokelish(x))\n\nnot Washable(roseanne)\n\ntherefore Washable(roseanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Filmore is astragalar. Filmore is culpable. Filmore is reflecting. Filmore is apocryphal. Filmore is thrilling. Filmore is catacorner. Filmore is fiendish. Olle is astragalar. Olle is culpable. Olle is reflecting. Olle is apocryphal. Olle is catacorner. Olle is fiendish. Shaylah is apocryphal. Shaylah is fiendish. If something is apocryphal then it is astragalar. Blue, astragalar things are thrilling. Cold, astragalar things are thrilling. If something is catacorner then it is fiendish. If Olle is fiendish and Olle is apocryphal then Olle is astragalar. All fiendish, reflecting things are thrilling. All catacorner, thrilling things are fiendish. All astragalar, fiendish things are reflecting. Shaylah is astragalar.", "logic": "\nAstragalar(filmore)\nCulpable(filmore)\nReflecting(filmore)\nApocryphal(filmore)\nThrilling(filmore)\nCatacorner(filmore)\nFiendish(filmore)\nAstragalar(olle)\nCulpable(olle)\nReflecting(olle)\nApocryphal(olle)\nCatacorner(olle)\nFiendish(olle)\nApocryphal(shaylah)\nFiendish(shaylah)\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Astragalar(x))\nforall x (Culpable(x) and Astragalar(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Astragalar(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) -> Fiendish(x))\nFiendish(olle) and Apocryphal(olle) -> Astragalar(olle)\nforall x (Fiendish(x) and Reflecting(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Catacorner(x) and Thrilling(x) -> Fiendish(x))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) and Fiendish(x) -> Reflecting(x))\n\nAstragalar(shaylah)\n\nApocryphal(shaylah) and forall x (Apocryphal(x) -> Astragalar(x)) -> therefore Astragalar(shaylah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Hubert is affinal. Hubert is boffo. Hubert is segregated. Hubert is inelastic. Hubert is toadyish. Hubert is stannic. Hubert is baboonish. Clarissa is affinal. Clarissa is boffo. Clarissa is segregated. Clarissa is inelastic. Clarissa is stannic. Clarissa is baboonish. Wildon is inelastic. Wildon is baboonish. If something is inelastic then it is affinal. Blue, affinal things are toadyish. Cold, affinal things are toadyish. If something is stannic then it is baboonish. If Clarissa is baboonish and Clarissa is inelastic then Clarissa is affinal. All baboonish, segregated things are toadyish. All stannic, toadyish things are baboonish. All affinal, baboonish things are segregated. Wildon is not affinal.", "logic": "\nAffinal(hubert)\nBoffo(hubert)\nSegregated(hubert)\nInelastic(hubert)\nToadyish(hubert)\nStannic(hubert)\nBaboonish(hubert)\nAffinal(clarissa)\nBoffo(clarissa)\nSegregated(clarissa)\nInelastic(clarissa)\nStannic(clarissa)\nBaboonish(clarissa)\nInelastic(wildon)\nBaboonish(wildon)\nforall x (Inelastic(x) -> Affinal(x))\nforall x (Boffo(x) and Affinal(x) -> Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Segregated(x) and Affinal(x) -> Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Stannic(x) -> Baboonish(x))\nBaboonish(clarissa) and Inelastic(clarissa) -> Affinal(clarissa)\nforall x (Baboonish(x) and Segregated(x) -> Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Stannic(x) and Toadyish(x) -> Baboonish(x))\nforall x (Affinal(x) and Baboonish(x) -> Segregated(x))\n\nnot Affinal(wildon)\n\nInelastic(wildon) and forall x (Inelastic(x) -> Affinal(x)) -> therefore Affinal(wildon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Osborn is permutable. Osborn is sturdy. Osborn is traveled. Osborn is calyptrate. Osborn is requested. Osborn is bicolour. Osborn is chainlike. Shandie is permutable. Shandie is sturdy. Shandie is traveled. Shandie is calyptrate. Shandie is bicolour. Shandie is chainlike. Karen is calyptrate. Karen is chainlike. If something is calyptrate then it is permutable. Blue, permutable things are requested. Cold, permutable things are requested. If something is bicolour then it is chainlike. If Shandie is chainlike and Shandie is calyptrate then Shandie is permutable. All chainlike, traveled things are requested. All bicolour, requested things are chainlike. All permutable, chainlike things are traveled. Karen is traveled.", "logic": "\nPermutable(osborn)\nSturdy(osborn)\nTraveled(osborn)\nCalyptrate(osborn)\nRequested(osborn)\nBicolour(osborn)\nChainlike(osborn)\nPermutable(shandie)\nSturdy(shandie)\nTraveled(shandie)\nCalyptrate(shandie)\nBicolour(shandie)\nChainlike(shandie)\nCalyptrate(karen)\nChainlike(karen)\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) -> Permutable(x))\nforall x (Sturdy(x) and Permutable(x) -> Requested(x))\nforall x (Traveled(x) and Permutable(x) -> Requested(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) -> Chainlike(x))\nChainlike(shandie) and Calyptrate(shandie) -> Permutable(shandie)\nforall x (Chainlike(x) and Traveled(x) -> Requested(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and Requested(x) -> Chainlike(x))\nforall x (Permutable(x) and Chainlike(x) -> Traveled(x))\n\nTraveled(karen)\n\nCalyptrate(karen) and forall x (Calyptrate(x) -> Permutable(x)) -> therefore Permutable(karen) Permutable(karen) and Chainlike(karen) and forall x (Permutable(x) and Chainlike(x) -> Traveled(x)) -> therefore Traveled(karen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Lynnelle is calyptrate. Lynnelle is tenfold. Lynnelle is elegiac. Lynnelle is fruitless. Lynnelle is tenth. Lynnelle is uninspired. Lynnelle is caesarian. Caesar is calyptrate. Caesar is tenfold. Caesar is elegiac. Caesar is fruitless. Caesar is uninspired. Caesar is caesarian. Benny is fruitless. Benny is caesarian. If something is fruitless then it is calyptrate. Blue, calyptrate things are tenth. Cold, calyptrate things are tenth. If something is uninspired then it is caesarian. If Caesar is caesarian and Caesar is fruitless then Caesar is calyptrate. All caesarian, elegiac things are tenth. All uninspired, tenth things are caesarian. All calyptrate, caesarian things are elegiac. Benny is not elegiac.", "logic": "\nCalyptrate(lynnelle)\nTenfold(lynnelle)\nElegiac(lynnelle)\nFruitless(lynnelle)\nTenth(lynnelle)\nUninspired(lynnelle)\nCaesarian(lynnelle)\nCalyptrate(caesar)\nTenfold(caesar)\nElegiac(caesar)\nFruitless(caesar)\nUninspired(caesar)\nCaesarian(caesar)\nFruitless(benny)\nCaesarian(benny)\nforall x (Fruitless(x) -> Calyptrate(x))\nforall x (Tenfold(x) and Calyptrate(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Elegiac(x) and Calyptrate(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Uninspired(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nCaesarian(caesar) and Fruitless(caesar) -> Calyptrate(caesar)\nforall x (Caesarian(x) and Elegiac(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Uninspired(x) and Tenth(x) -> Caesarian(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) and Caesarian(x) -> Elegiac(x))\n\nnot Elegiac(benny)\n\nFruitless(benny) and forall x (Fruitless(x) -> Calyptrate(x)) -> therefore Calyptrate(benny) Calyptrate(benny) and Caesarian(benny) and forall x (Calyptrate(x) and Caesarian(x) -> Elegiac(x)) -> therefore Elegiac(benny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Monica is boggy. Monica is tribal. Monica is archival. Monica is unfilled. Monica is myotonic. Monica is polyvalent. Monica is refractory. Emmy is boggy. Emmy is tribal. Emmy is archival. Emmy is unfilled. Emmy is polyvalent. Emmy is refractory. Celestia is unfilled. Celestia is refractory. If something is unfilled then it is boggy. Blue, boggy things are myotonic. Cold, boggy things are myotonic. If something is polyvalent then it is refractory. If Emmy is refractory and Emmy is unfilled then Emmy is boggy. All refractory, archival things are myotonic. All polyvalent, myotonic things are refractory. All boggy, refractory things are archival. Celestia is myotonic.", "logic": "\nBoggy(monica)\nTribal(monica)\nArchival(monica)\nUnfilled(monica)\nMyotonic(monica)\nPolyvalent(monica)\nRefractory(monica)\nBoggy(emmy)\nTribal(emmy)\nArchival(emmy)\nUnfilled(emmy)\nPolyvalent(emmy)\nRefractory(emmy)\nUnfilled(celestia)\nRefractory(celestia)\nforall x (Unfilled(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Tribal(x) and Boggy(x) -> Myotonic(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) and Boggy(x) -> Myotonic(x))\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) -> Refractory(x))\nRefractory(emmy) and Unfilled(emmy) -> Boggy(emmy)\nforall x (Refractory(x) and Archival(x) -> Myotonic(x))\nforall x (Polyvalent(x) and Myotonic(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Boggy(x) and Refractory(x) -> Archival(x))\n\nMyotonic(celestia)\n\nUnfilled(celestia) and forall x (Unfilled(x) -> Boggy(x)) -> therefore Boggy(celestia) Boggy(celestia) and Refractory(celestia) and forall x (Boggy(x) and Refractory(x) -> Archival(x)) -> therefore Archival(celestia) Refractory(celestia) and Archival(celestia) and forall x (Refractory(x) and Archival(x) -> Myotonic(x)) -> therefore Myotonic(celestia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Nena is needled. Nena is uneducated. Nena is about. Nena is sinuate. Nena is supperless. Nena is catching. Nena is koranic. Tawsha is needled. Tawsha is uneducated. Tawsha is about. Tawsha is sinuate. Tawsha is catching. Tawsha is koranic. Brianne is sinuate. Brianne is koranic. If something is sinuate then it is needled. Blue, needled things are supperless. Cold, needled things are supperless. If something is catching then it is koranic. If Tawsha is koranic and Tawsha is sinuate then Tawsha is needled. All koranic, about things are supperless. All catching, supperless things are koranic. All needled, koranic things are about. Brianne is not supperless.", "logic": "\nNeedled(nena)\nUneducated(nena)\nAbout(nena)\nSinuate(nena)\nSupperless(nena)\nCatching(nena)\nKoranic(nena)\nNeedled(tawsha)\nUneducated(tawsha)\nAbout(tawsha)\nSinuate(tawsha)\nCatching(tawsha)\nKoranic(tawsha)\nSinuate(brianne)\nKoranic(brianne)\nforall x (Sinuate(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Needled(x) -> Supperless(x))\nforall x (About(x) and Needled(x) -> Supperless(x))\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Koranic(x))\nKoranic(tawsha) and Sinuate(tawsha) -> Needled(tawsha)\nforall x (Koranic(x) and About(x) -> Supperless(x))\nforall x (Catching(x) and Supperless(x) -> Koranic(x))\nforall x (Needled(x) and Koranic(x) -> About(x))\n\nnot Supperless(brianne)\n\nSinuate(brianne) and forall x (Sinuate(x) -> Needled(x)) -> therefore Needled(brianne) Needled(brianne) and Koranic(brianne) and forall x (Needled(x) and Koranic(x) -> About(x)) -> therefore About(brianne) Koranic(brianne) and About(brianne) and forall x (Koranic(x) and About(x) -> Supperless(x)) -> therefore Supperless(brianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Clifton is veteran. Clifton is alated. Clifton is mistreated. Clifton is rustic. Clifton is hairless. Clifton is homophobic. Clifton is unfocused. April is veteran. April is alated. April is mistreated. April is rustic. April is homophobic. April is unfocused. Cameron is rustic. Cameron is unfocused. If something is rustic then it is veteran. Blue, veteran things are hairless. Cold, veteran things are hairless. If something is homophobic then it is unfocused. If April is unfocused and April is rustic then April is veteran. All unfocused, mistreated things are hairless. All homophobic, hairless things are unfocused. All veteran, unfocused things are mistreated. Cameron is not alated.", "logic": "\nVeteran(clifton)\nAlated(clifton)\nMistreated(clifton)\nRustic(clifton)\nHairless(clifton)\nHomophobic(clifton)\nUnfocused(clifton)\nVeteran(april)\nAlated(april)\nMistreated(april)\nRustic(april)\nHomophobic(april)\nUnfocused(april)\nRustic(cameron)\nUnfocused(cameron)\nforall x (Rustic(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) and Veteran(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Mistreated(x) and Veteran(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Unfocused(x))\nUnfocused(april) and Rustic(april) -> Veteran(april)\nforall x (Unfocused(x) and Mistreated(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) and Hairless(x) -> Unfocused(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Unfocused(x) -> Mistreated(x))\n\nnot Alated(cameron)\n\nnot Alated(cameron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Lewis is spread. Lewis is anapaestic. Lewis is horrified. Lewis is truant. Lewis is ambrosial. Lewis is septuple. Lewis is hourlong. Candie is spread. Candie is anapaestic. Candie is horrified. Candie is truant. Candie is septuple. Candie is hourlong. Aggy is truant. Aggy is hourlong. If something is truant then it is spread. Blue, spread things are ambrosial. Cold, spread things are ambrosial. If something is septuple then it is hourlong. If Candie is hourlong and Candie is truant then Candie is spread. All hourlong, horrified things are ambrosial. All septuple, ambrosial things are hourlong. All spread, hourlong things are horrified. Aggy is septuple.", "logic": "\nSpread(lewis)\nAnapaestic(lewis)\nHorrified(lewis)\nTruant(lewis)\nAmbrosial(lewis)\nSeptuple(lewis)\nHourlong(lewis)\nSpread(candie)\nAnapaestic(candie)\nHorrified(candie)\nTruant(candie)\nSeptuple(candie)\nHourlong(candie)\nTruant(aggy)\nHourlong(aggy)\nforall x (Truant(x) -> Spread(x))\nforall x (Anapaestic(x) and Spread(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Spread(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\nforall x (Septuple(x) -> Hourlong(x))\nHourlong(candie) and Truant(candie) -> Spread(candie)\nforall x (Hourlong(x) and Horrified(x) -> Ambrosial(x))\nforall x (Septuple(x) and Ambrosial(x) -> Hourlong(x))\nforall x (Spread(x) and Hourlong(x) -> Horrified(x))\n\nSeptuple(aggy)\n\nSeptuple(aggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Odell is not albuminous. Odell is descendant. Odell is ulterior. All curtal things are confirmed. White things are not descendant. If Odell is confirmed and Odell is turned then Odell is not albuminous. If Odell is descendant and Odell is confirmed then Odell is not turned. All ulterior things are curtal. Round, turned things are not albuminous. Furry things are albuminous. If something is ulterior and not curtal then it is not albuminous. Odell is ulterior.", "logic": "\nnot Albuminous(odell)\nDescendant(odell)\nUlterior(odell)\nforall x (Curtal(x) -> Confirmed(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> not Descendant(x))\nConfirmed(odell) and Turned(odell) -> not Albuminous(odell)\nDescendant(odell) and Confirmed(odell) -> not Turned(odell)\nforall x (Ulterior(x) -> Curtal(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and Turned(x) -> not Albuminous(x))\nforall x (Turned(x) -> Albuminous(x))\nforall x (Ulterior(x) and not Curtal(x) -> not Albuminous(x))\n\nUlterior(odell)\n\ntherefore Ulterior(odell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Misti is not bestial. Misti is cumuliform. Misti is pedantic. All seemly things are harmonical. White things are not cumuliform. If Misti is harmonical and Misti is offhand then Misti is not bestial. If Misti is cumuliform and Misti is harmonical then Misti is not offhand. All pedantic things are seemly. Round, offhand things are not bestial. Furry things are bestial. If something is pedantic and not seemly then it is not bestial. Misti is bestial.", "logic": "\nnot Bestial(misti)\nCumuliform(misti)\nPedantic(misti)\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Salacious(x) -> not Cumuliform(x))\nHarmonical(misti) and Offhand(misti) -> not Bestial(misti)\nCumuliform(misti) and Harmonical(misti) -> not Offhand(misti)\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Seemly(x))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) and Offhand(x) -> not Bestial(x))\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Bestial(x))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) and not Seemly(x) -> not Bestial(x))\n\nBestial(misti)\n\ntherefore not Bestial(misti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Sharleen is not hematal. Sharleen is suchlike. Sharleen is toiling. All analyzable things are parhelic. White things are not suchlike. If Sharleen is parhelic and Sharleen is daily then Sharleen is not hematal. If Sharleen is suchlike and Sharleen is parhelic then Sharleen is not daily. All toiling things are analyzable. Round, daily things are not hematal. Furry things are hematal. If something is toiling and not analyzable then it is not hematal. Sharleen is analyzable.", "logic": "\nnot Hematal(sharleen)\nSuchlike(sharleen)\nToiling(sharleen)\nforall x (Analyzable(x) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (Corrugated(x) -> not Suchlike(x))\nParhelic(sharleen) and Daily(sharleen) -> not Hematal(sharleen)\nSuchlike(sharleen) and Parhelic(sharleen) -> not Daily(sharleen)\nforall x (Toiling(x) -> Analyzable(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Daily(x) -> not Hematal(x))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and not Analyzable(x) -> not Hematal(x))\n\nAnalyzable(sharleen)\n\nToiling(sharleen) and forall x (Toiling(x) -> Analyzable(x)) -> therefore Analyzable(sharleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Ferdinand is not vegetative. Ferdinand is smoking. Ferdinand is penciled. All acquainted things are unabated. White things are not smoking. If Ferdinand is unabated and Ferdinand is mechanic then Ferdinand is not vegetative. If Ferdinand is smoking and Ferdinand is unabated then Ferdinand is not mechanic. All penciled things are acquainted. Round, mechanic things are not vegetative. Furry things are vegetative. If something is penciled and not acquainted then it is not vegetative. Ferdinand is not acquainted.", "logic": "\nnot Vegetative(ferdinand)\nSmoking(ferdinand)\nPenciled(ferdinand)\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Bubbling(x) -> not Smoking(x))\nUnabated(ferdinand) and Mechanic(ferdinand) -> not Vegetative(ferdinand)\nSmoking(ferdinand) and Unabated(ferdinand) -> not Mechanic(ferdinand)\nforall x (Penciled(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Penciled(x) and Mechanic(x) -> not Vegetative(x))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) -> Vegetative(x))\nforall x (Penciled(x) and not Acquainted(x) -> not Vegetative(x))\n\nnot Acquainted(ferdinand)\n\nPenciled(ferdinand) and forall x (Penciled(x) -> Acquainted(x)) -> therefore Acquainted(ferdinand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Leilah is not amnestic. Leilah is prosy. Leilah is peripteral. All humiliated things are bulbed. White things are not prosy. If Leilah is bulbed and Leilah is vestmental then Leilah is not amnestic. If Leilah is prosy and Leilah is bulbed then Leilah is not vestmental. All peripteral things are humiliated. Round, vestmental things are not amnestic. Furry things are amnestic. If something is peripteral and not humiliated then it is not amnestic. Leilah is bulbed.", "logic": "\nnot Amnestic(leilah)\nProsy(leilah)\nPeripteral(leilah)\nforall x (Humiliated(x) -> Bulbed(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> not Prosy(x))\nBulbed(leilah) and Vestmental(leilah) -> not Amnestic(leilah)\nProsy(leilah) and Bulbed(leilah) -> not Vestmental(leilah)\nforall x (Peripteral(x) -> Humiliated(x))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) and Vestmental(x) -> not Amnestic(x))\nforall x (Vestmental(x) -> Amnestic(x))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) and not Humiliated(x) -> not Amnestic(x))\n\nBulbed(leilah)\n\nPeripteral(leilah) and forall x (Peripteral(x) -> Humiliated(x)) -> therefore Humiliated(leilah) Humiliated(leilah) and forall x (Humiliated(x) -> Bulbed(x)) -> therefore Bulbed(leilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Kacy is not forlorn. Kacy is acidotic. Kacy is visionary. All fore things are thickened. White things are not acidotic. If Kacy is thickened and Kacy is palpebrate then Kacy is not forlorn. If Kacy is acidotic and Kacy is thickened then Kacy is not palpebrate. All visionary things are fore. Round, palpebrate things are not forlorn. Furry things are forlorn. If something is visionary and not fore then it is not forlorn. Kacy is not thickened.", "logic": "\nnot Forlorn(kacy)\nAcidotic(kacy)\nVisionary(kacy)\nforall x (Fore(x) -> Thickened(x))\nforall x (Severe(x) -> not Acidotic(x))\nThickened(kacy) and Palpebrate(kacy) -> not Forlorn(kacy)\nAcidotic(kacy) and Thickened(kacy) -> not Palpebrate(kacy)\nforall x (Visionary(x) -> Fore(x))\nforall x (Visionary(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> not Forlorn(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) -> Forlorn(x))\nforall x (Visionary(x) and not Fore(x) -> not Forlorn(x))\n\nnot Thickened(kacy)\n\nVisionary(kacy) and forall x (Visionary(x) -> Fore(x)) -> therefore Fore(kacy) Fore(kacy) and forall x (Fore(x) -> Thickened(x)) -> therefore Thickened(kacy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Terrianne is not disklike. Terrianne is starring. Terrianne is uxorious. All monodical things are argent. White things are not starring. If Terrianne is argent and Terrianne is ugly then Terrianne is not disklike. If Terrianne is starring and Terrianne is argent then Terrianne is not ugly. All uxorious things are monodical. Round, ugly things are not disklike. Furry things are disklike. If something is uxorious and not monodical then it is not disklike. Terrianne is not ugly.", "logic": "\nnot Disklike(terrianne)\nStarring(terrianne)\nUxorious(terrianne)\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> Argent(x))\nforall x (Dabbled(x) -> not Starring(x))\nArgent(terrianne) and Ugly(terrianne) -> not Disklike(terrianne)\nStarring(terrianne) and Argent(terrianne) -> not Ugly(terrianne)\nforall x (Uxorious(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) and Ugly(x) -> not Disklike(x))\nforall x (Ugly(x) -> Disklike(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) and not Monodical(x) -> not Disklike(x))\n\nnot Ugly(terrianne)\n\nUxorious(terrianne) and forall x (Uxorious(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(terrianne) Monodical(terrianne) and forall x (Monodical(x) -> Argent(x)) -> therefore Argent(terrianne) Starring(terrianne) and Argent(terrianne) and Starring(terrianne) and Argent(terrianne) -> not Ugly(terrianne) -> therefore not Ugly(terrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Quintin is not bestubbled. Quintin is mingy. Quintin is hyoid. All premium things are stoned. White things are not mingy. If Quintin is stoned and Quintin is recognized then Quintin is not bestubbled. If Quintin is mingy and Quintin is stoned then Quintin is not recognized. All hyoid things are premium. Round, recognized things are not bestubbled. Furry things are bestubbled. If something is hyoid and not premium then it is not bestubbled. Quintin is recognized.", "logic": "\nnot Bestubbled(quintin)\nMingy(quintin)\nHyoid(quintin)\nforall x (Premium(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> not Mingy(x))\nStoned(quintin) and Recognized(quintin) -> not Bestubbled(quintin)\nMingy(quintin) and Stoned(quintin) -> not Recognized(quintin)\nforall x (Hyoid(x) -> Premium(x))\nforall x (Hyoid(x) and Recognized(x) -> not Bestubbled(x))\nforall x (Recognized(x) -> Bestubbled(x))\nforall x (Hyoid(x) and not Premium(x) -> not Bestubbled(x))\n\nRecognized(quintin)\n\nHyoid(quintin) and forall x (Hyoid(x) -> Premium(x)) -> therefore Premium(quintin) Premium(quintin) and forall x (Premium(x) -> Stoned(x)) -> therefore Stoned(quintin) Mingy(quintin) and Stoned(quintin) and Mingy(quintin) and Stoned(quintin) -> not Recognized(quintin) -> therefore not Recognized(quintin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1267"} {"premises": "Stephine is leaning. Stephine is seasick. Sally is cuboid. Sally is simulated. Mikey is leaning. Mikey is seasick. Mikey is tilted. Mikey is simulated. Talyah is leaning. Talyah is not obsequious. Smart things are seasick. If Mikey is simulated and Mikey is cuboid then Mikey is popish. If Stephine is leaning and Stephine is seasick then Stephine is not obsequious. Green things are cuboid. If something is simulated and leaning then it is tilted. Furry things are not obsequious. If something is seasick and not tilted then it is popish. If Talyah is tilted and Talyah is popish then Talyah is not cuboid. Sally is simulated.", "logic": "\nLeaning(stephine)\nSeasick(stephine)\nCuboid(sally)\nSimulated(sally)\nLeaning(mikey)\nSeasick(mikey)\nTilted(mikey)\nSimulated(mikey)\nLeaning(talyah)\nnot Obsequious(talyah)\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Seasick(x))\nSimulated(mikey) and Cuboid(mikey) -> Popish(mikey)\nLeaning(stephine) and Seasick(stephine) -> not Obsequious(stephine)\nforall x (Leaning(x) -> Cuboid(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) and Leaning(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Popish(x) -> not Obsequious(x))\nforall x (Seasick(x) and not Tilted(x) -> Popish(x))\nTilted(talyah) and Popish(talyah) -> not Cuboid(talyah)\n\nSimulated(sally)\n\ntherefore Simulated(sally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Esta is briny. Esta is racist. Maritsa is saxon. Maritsa is hulky. Ignace is briny. Ignace is racist. Ignace is flyblown. Ignace is hulky. Aurlie is briny. Aurlie is not encircled. Smart things are racist. If Ignace is hulky and Ignace is saxon then Ignace is velvet. If Esta is briny and Esta is racist then Esta is not encircled. Green things are saxon. If something is hulky and briny then it is flyblown. Furry things are not encircled. If something is racist and not flyblown then it is velvet. If Aurlie is flyblown and Aurlie is velvet then Aurlie is not saxon. Ignace is not briny.", "logic": "\nBriny(esta)\nRacist(esta)\nSaxon(maritsa)\nHulky(maritsa)\nBriny(ignace)\nRacist(ignace)\nFlyblown(ignace)\nHulky(ignace)\nBriny(aurlie)\nnot Encircled(aurlie)\nforall x (Flyblown(x) -> Racist(x))\nHulky(ignace) and Saxon(ignace) -> Velvet(ignace)\nBriny(esta) and Racist(esta) -> not Encircled(esta)\nforall x (Briny(x) -> Saxon(x))\nforall x (Hulky(x) and Briny(x) -> Flyblown(x))\nforall x (Velvet(x) -> not Encircled(x))\nforall x (Racist(x) and not Flyblown(x) -> Velvet(x))\nFlyblown(aurlie) and Velvet(aurlie) -> not Saxon(aurlie)\n\nnot Briny(ignace)\n\ntherefore Briny(ignace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Pepito is married. Pepito is headstrong. Christine is bosky. Christine is banal. Lavina is married. Lavina is headstrong. Lavina is eager. Lavina is banal. Celisse is married. Celisse is not sweetish. Smart things are headstrong. If Lavina is banal and Lavina is bosky then Lavina is squabby. If Pepito is married and Pepito is headstrong then Pepito is not sweetish. Green things are bosky. If something is banal and married then it is eager. Furry things are not sweetish. If something is headstrong and not eager then it is squabby. If Celisse is eager and Celisse is squabby then Celisse is not bosky. Pepito is not sweetish.", "logic": "\nMarried(pepito)\nHeadstrong(pepito)\nBosky(christine)\nBanal(christine)\nMarried(lavina)\nHeadstrong(lavina)\nEager(lavina)\nBanal(lavina)\nMarried(celisse)\nnot Sweetish(celisse)\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Headstrong(x))\nBanal(lavina) and Bosky(lavina) -> Squabby(lavina)\nMarried(pepito) and Headstrong(pepito) -> not Sweetish(pepito)\nforall x (Married(x) -> Bosky(x))\nforall x (Banal(x) and Married(x) -> Eager(x))\nforall x (Squabby(x) -> not Sweetish(x))\nforall x (Headstrong(x) and not Eager(x) -> Squabby(x))\nEager(celisse) and Squabby(celisse) -> not Bosky(celisse)\n\nnot Sweetish(pepito)\n\nMarried(pepito) and Headstrong(pepito) and Married(pepito) and Headstrong(pepito) -> not Sweetish(pepito) -> therefore not Sweetish(pepito)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Anica is trabeate. Anica is nosy. Linell is proximo. Linell is polydactyl. Dannie is trabeate. Dannie is nosy. Dannie is crinkled. Dannie is polydactyl. Wallis is trabeate. Wallis is not depressing. Smart things are nosy. If Dannie is polydactyl and Dannie is proximo then Dannie is togolese. If Anica is trabeate and Anica is nosy then Anica is not depressing. Green things are proximo. If something is polydactyl and trabeate then it is crinkled. Furry things are not depressing. If something is nosy and not crinkled then it is togolese. If Wallis is crinkled and Wallis is togolese then Wallis is not proximo. Wallis is not proximo.", "logic": "\nTrabeate(anica)\nNosy(anica)\nProximo(linell)\nPolydactyl(linell)\nTrabeate(dannie)\nNosy(dannie)\nCrinkled(dannie)\nPolydactyl(dannie)\nTrabeate(wallis)\nnot Depressing(wallis)\nforall x (Crinkled(x) -> Nosy(x))\nPolydactyl(dannie) and Proximo(dannie) -> Togolese(dannie)\nTrabeate(anica) and Nosy(anica) -> not Depressing(anica)\nforall x (Trabeate(x) -> Proximo(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Trabeate(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> not Depressing(x))\nforall x (Nosy(x) and not Crinkled(x) -> Togolese(x))\nCrinkled(wallis) and Togolese(wallis) -> not Proximo(wallis)\n\nnot Proximo(wallis)\n\nTrabeate(wallis) and forall x (Trabeate(x) -> Proximo(x)) -> therefore Proximo(wallis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Dinnie is knackered. Dinnie is pumped. Catherin is cypriote. Catherin is outdoor. Adey is knackered. Adey is pumped. Adey is waxy. Adey is outdoor. Mohan is knackered. Mohan is not inhabited. Smart things are pumped. If Adey is outdoor and Adey is cypriote then Adey is beaded. If Dinnie is knackered and Dinnie is pumped then Dinnie is not inhabited. Green things are cypriote. If something is outdoor and knackered then it is waxy. Furry things are not inhabited. If something is pumped and not waxy then it is beaded. If Mohan is waxy and Mohan is beaded then Mohan is not cypriote. Adey is beaded.", "logic": "\nKnackered(dinnie)\nPumped(dinnie)\nCypriote(catherin)\nOutdoor(catherin)\nKnackered(adey)\nPumped(adey)\nWaxy(adey)\nOutdoor(adey)\nKnackered(mohan)\nnot Inhabited(mohan)\nforall x (Waxy(x) -> Pumped(x))\nOutdoor(adey) and Cypriote(adey) -> Beaded(adey)\nKnackered(dinnie) and Pumped(dinnie) -> not Inhabited(dinnie)\nforall x (Knackered(x) -> Cypriote(x))\nforall x (Outdoor(x) and Knackered(x) -> Waxy(x))\nforall x (Beaded(x) -> not Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Pumped(x) and not Waxy(x) -> Beaded(x))\nWaxy(mohan) and Beaded(mohan) -> not Cypriote(mohan)\n\nBeaded(adey)\n\nKnackered(adey) and forall x (Knackered(x) -> Cypriote(x)) -> therefore Cypriote(adey) Outdoor(adey) and Cypriote(adey) and Outdoor(adey) and Cypriote(adey) -> Beaded(adey) -> therefore Beaded(adey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Holli is writhing. Holli is weeny. Zed is outlawed. Zed is cuneiform. Engelbert is writhing. Engelbert is weeny. Engelbert is strenuous. Engelbert is cuneiform. Caralie is writhing. Caralie is not warm. Smart things are weeny. If Engelbert is cuneiform and Engelbert is outlawed then Engelbert is spaced. If Holli is writhing and Holli is weeny then Holli is not warm. Green things are outlawed. If something is cuneiform and writhing then it is strenuous. Furry things are not warm. If something is weeny and not strenuous then it is spaced. If Caralie is strenuous and Caralie is spaced then Caralie is not outlawed. Engelbert is not spaced.", "logic": "\nWrithing(holli)\nWeeny(holli)\nOutlawed(zed)\nCuneiform(zed)\nWrithing(engelbert)\nWeeny(engelbert)\nStrenuous(engelbert)\nCuneiform(engelbert)\nWrithing(caralie)\nnot Warm(caralie)\nforall x (Strenuous(x) -> Weeny(x))\nCuneiform(engelbert) and Outlawed(engelbert) -> Spaced(engelbert)\nWrithing(holli) and Weeny(holli) -> not Warm(holli)\nforall x (Writhing(x) -> Outlawed(x))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Writhing(x) -> Strenuous(x))\nforall x (Spaced(x) -> not Warm(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) and not Strenuous(x) -> Spaced(x))\nStrenuous(caralie) and Spaced(caralie) -> not Outlawed(caralie)\n\nnot Spaced(engelbert)\n\nWrithing(engelbert) and forall x (Writhing(x) -> Outlawed(x)) -> therefore Outlawed(engelbert) Cuneiform(engelbert) and Outlawed(engelbert) and Cuneiform(engelbert) and Outlawed(engelbert) -> Spaced(engelbert) -> therefore Spaced(engelbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Jemimah is unrecorded. Jemimah is hooflike. Pam is rural. Pam is calycular. Judd is unrecorded. Judd is hooflike. Judd is wrought. Judd is calycular. Doll is unrecorded. Doll is not dateless. Smart things are hooflike. If Judd is calycular and Judd is rural then Judd is rubber. If Jemimah is unrecorded and Jemimah is hooflike then Jemimah is not dateless. Green things are rural. If something is calycular and unrecorded then it is wrought. Furry things are not dateless. If something is hooflike and not wrought then it is rubber. If Doll is wrought and Doll is rubber then Doll is not rural. Judd is not dateless.", "logic": "\nUnrecorded(jemimah)\nHooflike(jemimah)\nRural(pam)\nCalycular(pam)\nUnrecorded(judd)\nHooflike(judd)\nWrought(judd)\nCalycular(judd)\nUnrecorded(doll)\nnot Dateless(doll)\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> Hooflike(x))\nCalycular(judd) and Rural(judd) -> Rubber(judd)\nUnrecorded(jemimah) and Hooflike(jemimah) -> not Dateless(jemimah)\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Calycular(x) and Unrecorded(x) -> Wrought(x))\nforall x (Rubber(x) -> not Dateless(x))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and not Wrought(x) -> Rubber(x))\nWrought(doll) and Rubber(doll) -> not Rural(doll)\n\nnot Dateless(judd)\n\nUnrecorded(judd) and forall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Rural(x)) -> therefore Rural(judd) Calycular(judd) and Rural(judd) and Calycular(judd) and Rural(judd) -> Rubber(judd) -> therefore Rubber(judd) Rubber(judd) and forall x (Rubber(x) -> not Dateless(x)) -> therefore not Dateless(judd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Jobi is noduled. Jobi is gooselike. Halli is neckless. Halli is dissenting. Raven is noduled. Raven is gooselike. Raven is uncolored. Raven is dissenting. Catharina is noduled. Catharina is not unbanded. Smart things are gooselike. If Raven is dissenting and Raven is neckless then Raven is ascetic. If Jobi is noduled and Jobi is gooselike then Jobi is not unbanded. Green things are neckless. If something is dissenting and noduled then it is uncolored. Furry things are not unbanded. If something is gooselike and not uncolored then it is ascetic. If Catharina is uncolored and Catharina is ascetic then Catharina is not neckless. Raven is unbanded.", "logic": "\nNoduled(jobi)\nGooselike(jobi)\nNeckless(halli)\nDissenting(halli)\nNoduled(raven)\nGooselike(raven)\nUncolored(raven)\nDissenting(raven)\nNoduled(catharina)\nnot Unbanded(catharina)\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Gooselike(x))\nDissenting(raven) and Neckless(raven) -> Ascetic(raven)\nNoduled(jobi) and Gooselike(jobi) -> not Unbanded(jobi)\nforall x (Noduled(x) -> Neckless(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) and Noduled(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Ascetic(x) -> not Unbanded(x))\nforall x (Gooselike(x) and not Uncolored(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nUncolored(catharina) and Ascetic(catharina) -> not Neckless(catharina)\n\nUnbanded(raven)\n\nNoduled(raven) and forall x (Noduled(x) -> Neckless(x)) -> therefore Neckless(raven) Dissenting(raven) and Neckless(raven) and Dissenting(raven) and Neckless(raven) -> Ascetic(raven) -> therefore Ascetic(raven) Ascetic(raven) and forall x (Ascetic(x) -> not Unbanded(x)) -> therefore not Unbanded(raven)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Iris is habitual. Iris is hooflike. Tobye is panoptic. Tobye is monotonic. Grier is habitual. Grier is hooflike. Grier is allusive. Grier is monotonic. Wilhelm is habitual. Wilhelm is not nonhuman. Smart things are hooflike. If Grier is monotonic and Grier is panoptic then Grier is passerine. If Iris is habitual and Iris is hooflike then Iris is not nonhuman. Green things are panoptic. If something is monotonic and habitual then it is allusive. Furry things are not nonhuman. If something is hooflike and not allusive then it is passerine. If Wilhelm is allusive and Wilhelm is passerine then Wilhelm is not panoptic. Wilhelm is not hooflike.", "logic": "\nHabitual(iris)\nHooflike(iris)\nPanoptic(tobye)\nMonotonic(tobye)\nHabitual(grier)\nHooflike(grier)\nAllusive(grier)\nMonotonic(grier)\nHabitual(wilhelm)\nnot Nonhuman(wilhelm)\nforall x (Allusive(x) -> Hooflike(x))\nMonotonic(grier) and Panoptic(grier) -> Passerine(grier)\nHabitual(iris) and Hooflike(iris) -> not Nonhuman(iris)\nforall x (Habitual(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Monotonic(x) and Habitual(x) -> Allusive(x))\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> not Nonhuman(x))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and not Allusive(x) -> Passerine(x))\nAllusive(wilhelm) and Passerine(wilhelm) -> not Panoptic(wilhelm)\n\nnot Hooflike(wilhelm)\n\nforall x (Allusive(x) -> Hooflike(x)) <- forall x (Monotonic(x) and Habitual(x) -> Allusive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Geoff is bantam. Geoff is french. Ivett is mated. Ivett is rending. Petrina is bantam. Petrina is french. Petrina is celtic. Petrina is rending. Magdalen is bantam. Magdalen is not appetizing. Smart things are french. If Petrina is rending and Petrina is mated then Petrina is gloveless. If Geoff is bantam and Geoff is french then Geoff is not appetizing. Green things are mated. If something is rending and bantam then it is celtic. Furry things are not appetizing. If something is french and not celtic then it is gloveless. If Magdalen is celtic and Magdalen is gloveless then Magdalen is not mated. Geoff is celtic.", "logic": "\nBantam(geoff)\nFrench(geoff)\nMated(ivett)\nRending(ivett)\nBantam(petrina)\nFrench(petrina)\nCeltic(petrina)\nRending(petrina)\nBantam(magdalen)\nnot Appetizing(magdalen)\nforall x (Celtic(x) -> French(x))\nRending(petrina) and Mated(petrina) -> Gloveless(petrina)\nBantam(geoff) and French(geoff) -> not Appetizing(geoff)\nforall x (Bantam(x) -> Mated(x))\nforall x (Rending(x) and Bantam(x) -> Celtic(x))\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> not Appetizing(x))\nforall x (French(x) and not Celtic(x) -> Gloveless(x))\nCeltic(magdalen) and Gloveless(magdalen) -> not Mated(magdalen)\n\nCeltic(geoff)\n\nforall x (Rending(x) and Bantam(x) -> Celtic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Guido is unwoven. Guido is belemnitic. Town is ironclad. Town is bilobated. Idell is unwoven. Idell is belemnitic. Idell is tentative. Idell is bilobated. Cyrillus is unwoven. Cyrillus is not lonely. Smart things are belemnitic. If Idell is bilobated and Idell is ironclad then Idell is periodic. If Guido is unwoven and Guido is belemnitic then Guido is not lonely. Green things are ironclad. If something is bilobated and unwoven then it is tentative. Furry things are not lonely. If something is belemnitic and not tentative then it is periodic. If Cyrillus is tentative and Cyrillus is periodic then Cyrillus is not ironclad. Town is not belemnitic.", "logic": "\nUnwoven(guido)\nBelemnitic(guido)\nIronclad(town)\nBilobated(town)\nUnwoven(idell)\nBelemnitic(idell)\nTentative(idell)\nBilobated(idell)\nUnwoven(cyrillus)\nnot Lonely(cyrillus)\nforall x (Tentative(x) -> Belemnitic(x))\nBilobated(idell) and Ironclad(idell) -> Periodic(idell)\nUnwoven(guido) and Belemnitic(guido) -> not Lonely(guido)\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> Ironclad(x))\nforall x (Bilobated(x) and Unwoven(x) -> Tentative(x))\nforall x (Periodic(x) -> not Lonely(x))\nforall x (Belemnitic(x) and not Tentative(x) -> Periodic(x))\nTentative(cyrillus) and Periodic(cyrillus) -> not Ironclad(cyrillus)\n\nnot Belemnitic(town)\n\nforall x (Tentative(x) -> Belemnitic(x)) <- forall x (Bilobated(x) and Unwoven(x) -> Tentative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Aloysius is swooning. Aloysius is spattered. Gerti is unrelaxed. Gerti is judicious. Farrah is swooning. Farrah is spattered. Farrah is ravaging. Farrah is judicious. Sigfrid is swooning. Sigfrid is not dozy. Smart things are spattered. If Farrah is judicious and Farrah is unrelaxed then Farrah is cherty. If Aloysius is swooning and Aloysius is spattered then Aloysius is not dozy. Green things are unrelaxed. If something is judicious and swooning then it is ravaging. Furry things are not dozy. If something is spattered and not ravaging then it is cherty. If Sigfrid is ravaging and Sigfrid is cherty then Sigfrid is not unrelaxed. Aloysius is cherty.", "logic": "\nSwooning(aloysius)\nSpattered(aloysius)\nUnrelaxed(gerti)\nJudicious(gerti)\nSwooning(farrah)\nSpattered(farrah)\nRavaging(farrah)\nJudicious(farrah)\nSwooning(sigfrid)\nnot Dozy(sigfrid)\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Spattered(x))\nJudicious(farrah) and Unrelaxed(farrah) -> Cherty(farrah)\nSwooning(aloysius) and Spattered(aloysius) -> not Dozy(aloysius)\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Judicious(x) and Swooning(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Cherty(x) -> not Dozy(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) and not Ravaging(x) -> Cherty(x))\nRavaging(sigfrid) and Cherty(sigfrid) -> not Unrelaxed(sigfrid)\n\nCherty(aloysius)\n\nforall x (Spattered(x) and not Ravaging(x) -> Cherty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Lothar is unheralded. Lothar is trichrome. Roobbie is maximizing. Roobbie is forgetful. Brendan is unheralded. Brendan is trichrome. Brendan is siliceous. Brendan is forgetful. Hercules is unheralded. Hercules is not maxillary. Smart things are trichrome. If Brendan is forgetful and Brendan is maximizing then Brendan is saxicoline. If Lothar is unheralded and Lothar is trichrome then Lothar is not maxillary. Green things are maximizing. If something is forgetful and unheralded then it is siliceous. Furry things are not maxillary. If something is trichrome and not siliceous then it is saxicoline. If Hercules is siliceous and Hercules is saxicoline then Hercules is not maximizing. Hercules is not forgetful.", "logic": "\nUnheralded(lothar)\nTrichrome(lothar)\nMaximizing(roobbie)\nForgetful(roobbie)\nUnheralded(brendan)\nTrichrome(brendan)\nSiliceous(brendan)\nForgetful(brendan)\nUnheralded(hercules)\nnot Maxillary(hercules)\nforall x (Siliceous(x) -> Trichrome(x))\nForgetful(brendan) and Maximizing(brendan) -> Saxicoline(brendan)\nUnheralded(lothar) and Trichrome(lothar) -> not Maxillary(lothar)\nforall x (Unheralded(x) -> Maximizing(x))\nforall x (Forgetful(x) and Unheralded(x) -> Siliceous(x))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> not Maxillary(x))\nforall x (Trichrome(x) and not Siliceous(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nSiliceous(hercules) and Saxicoline(hercules) -> not Maximizing(hercules)\n\nnot Forgetful(hercules)\n\nnot Forgetful(hercules) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Tallia is articulate. Tallia is tubal. Alastair is ultimate. Alastair is cecal. Alfonzo is articulate. Alfonzo is tubal. Alfonzo is oversea. Alfonzo is cecal. Ward is articulate. Ward is not unshadowed. Smart things are tubal. If Alfonzo is cecal and Alfonzo is ultimate then Alfonzo is concentric. If Tallia is articulate and Tallia is tubal then Tallia is not unshadowed. Green things are ultimate. If something is cecal and articulate then it is oversea. Furry things are not unshadowed. If something is tubal and not oversea then it is concentric. If Ward is oversea and Ward is concentric then Ward is not ultimate. Alastair is articulate.", "logic": "\nArticulate(tallia)\nTubal(tallia)\nUltimate(alastair)\nCecal(alastair)\nArticulate(alfonzo)\nTubal(alfonzo)\nOversea(alfonzo)\nCecal(alfonzo)\nArticulate(ward)\nnot Unshadowed(ward)\nforall x (Oversea(x) -> Tubal(x))\nCecal(alfonzo) and Ultimate(alfonzo) -> Concentric(alfonzo)\nArticulate(tallia) and Tubal(tallia) -> not Unshadowed(tallia)\nforall x (Articulate(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Cecal(x) and Articulate(x) -> Oversea(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> not Unshadowed(x))\nforall x (Tubal(x) and not Oversea(x) -> Concentric(x))\nOversea(ward) and Concentric(ward) -> not Ultimate(ward)\n\nArticulate(alastair)\n\nArticulate(alastair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Langston is another. Langston is prefaded. Felisha is nine. Felisha is merciful. Hermione is another. Hermione is prefaded. Hermione is stemless. Hermione is merciful. Uli is another. Uli is not damask. Smart things are prefaded. If Hermione is merciful and Hermione is nine then Hermione is assertive. If Langston is another and Langston is prefaded then Langston is not damask. Green things are nine. If something is merciful and another then it is stemless. Furry things are not damask. If something is prefaded and not stemless then it is assertive. If Uli is stemless and Uli is assertive then Uli is not nine. Felisha is not damask.", "logic": "\nAnother(langston)\nPrefaded(langston)\nNine(felisha)\nMerciful(felisha)\nAnother(hermione)\nPrefaded(hermione)\nStemless(hermione)\nMerciful(hermione)\nAnother(uli)\nnot Damask(uli)\nforall x (Stemless(x) -> Prefaded(x))\nMerciful(hermione) and Nine(hermione) -> Assertive(hermione)\nAnother(langston) and Prefaded(langston) -> not Damask(langston)\nforall x (Another(x) -> Nine(x))\nforall x (Merciful(x) and Another(x) -> Stemless(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) -> not Damask(x))\nforall x (Prefaded(x) and not Stemless(x) -> Assertive(x))\nStemless(uli) and Assertive(uli) -> not Nine(uli)\n\nnot Damask(felisha)\n\nnot Damask(felisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "Annabelle is italian. Annabelle is bounden. Carmina is rowdy. Carmina is senegalese. Robenia is italian. Robenia is bounden. Robenia is xanthous. Robenia is senegalese. Eugenie is italian. Eugenie is not feudatory. Smart things are bounden. If Robenia is senegalese and Robenia is rowdy then Robenia is basiscopic. If Annabelle is italian and Annabelle is bounden then Annabelle is not feudatory. Green things are rowdy. If something is senegalese and italian then it is xanthous. Furry things are not feudatory. If something is bounden and not xanthous then it is basiscopic. If Eugenie is xanthous and Eugenie is basiscopic then Eugenie is not rowdy. Annabelle is senegalese.", "logic": "\nItalian(annabelle)\nBounden(annabelle)\nRowdy(carmina)\nSenegalese(carmina)\nItalian(robenia)\nBounden(robenia)\nXanthous(robenia)\nSenegalese(robenia)\nItalian(eugenie)\nnot Feudatory(eugenie)\nforall x (Xanthous(x) -> Bounden(x))\nSenegalese(robenia) and Rowdy(robenia) -> Basiscopic(robenia)\nItalian(annabelle) and Bounden(annabelle) -> not Feudatory(annabelle)\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Rowdy(x))\nforall x (Senegalese(x) and Italian(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Basiscopic(x) -> not Feudatory(x))\nforall x (Bounden(x) and not Xanthous(x) -> Basiscopic(x))\nXanthous(eugenie) and Basiscopic(eugenie) -> not Rowdy(eugenie)\n\nSenegalese(annabelle)\n\nSenegalese(annabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-344"} {"premises": "The zalman is unprovable. The zalman is scandalous. The zalman wonder the rudie. The zalman abridge the rudie. The rudie shag the zalman. The rudie is moderato. The rudie is unprovable. The rudie is disdainful. The rudie is not scandalous. The rudie is disorderly. The rudie wonder the zalman. The rudie does not need the zalman. If the zalman does not chase the rudie and the zalman does not need the rudie then the zalman is unprovable. If the rudie abridge the zalman and the zalman abridge the rudie then the rudie does not like the zalman. If the rudie is unprovable and the rudie is disdainful then the rudie wonder the zalman. If the rudie does not chase the zalman then the rudie abridge the zalman. If someone wonder the zalman then the zalman is disdainful. If someone is disorderly and not disdainful then they do not like the rudie. The rudie does not need the zalman.", "logic": "\nUnprovable(zalman)\nScandalous(zalman)\nWonder(zalman, rudie)\nAbridge(zalman, rudie)\nShag(rudie, zalman)\nModerato(rudie)\nUnprovable(rudie)\nDisdainful(rudie)\nnot Scandalous(rudie)\nDisorderly(rudie)\nWonder(rudie, zalman)\nnot Abridge(rudie, zalman)\nnot Shag(zalman, rudie) and not Abridge(zalman, rudie) -> Unprovable(zalman)\nAbridge(rudie, zalman) and Abridge(zalman, rudie) -> not Wonder(rudie, zalman)\nUnprovable(rudie) and Disdainful(rudie) -> Wonder(rudie, zalman)\nnot Shag(rudie, zalman) -> Abridge(rudie, zalman)\nforall x (Wonder(x, zalman) -> Disdainful(zalman))\nforall x (Disorderly(x) and not Disdainful(x) -> not Wonder(x, rudie))\n\nnot Abridge(rudie, zalman)\n\ntherefore not Abridge(rudie, zalman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1275"} {"premises": "The pier is oversize. The pier is whispered. The pier catalyse the octavia. The pier pant the octavia. The octavia yawl the pier. The octavia is sown. The octavia is oversize. The octavia is caulked. The octavia is not whispered. The octavia is harmonized. The octavia catalyse the pier. The octavia does not need the pier. If the pier does not chase the octavia and the pier does not need the octavia then the pier is oversize. If the octavia pant the pier and the pier pant the octavia then the octavia does not like the pier. If the octavia is oversize and the octavia is caulked then the octavia catalyse the pier. If the octavia does not chase the pier then the octavia pant the pier. If someone catalyse the pier then the pier is caulked. If someone is harmonized and not caulked then they do not like the octavia. The pier does not like the octavia.", "logic": "\nOversize(pier)\nWhispered(pier)\nCatalyse(pier, octavia)\nPant(pier, octavia)\nYawl(octavia, pier)\nSown(octavia)\nOversize(octavia)\nCaulked(octavia)\nnot Whispered(octavia)\nHarmonized(octavia)\nCatalyse(octavia, pier)\nnot Pant(octavia, pier)\nnot Yawl(pier, octavia) and not Pant(pier, octavia) -> Oversize(pier)\nPant(octavia, pier) and Pant(pier, octavia) -> not Catalyse(octavia, pier)\nOversize(octavia) and Caulked(octavia) -> Catalyse(octavia, pier)\nnot Yawl(octavia, pier) -> Pant(octavia, pier)\nforall x (Catalyse(x, pier) -> Caulked(pier))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and not Caulked(x) -> not Catalyse(x, octavia))\n\nnot Catalyse(pier, octavia)\n\ntherefore Catalyse(pier, octavia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1275"} {"premises": "The neddy is huge. The neddy is aspheric. The neddy hunch the pia. The neddy nasalise the pia. The pia skirt the neddy. The pia is attired. The pia is huge. The pia is somatic. The pia is not aspheric. The pia is mute. The pia hunch the neddy. The pia does not need the neddy. If the neddy does not chase the pia and the neddy does not need the pia then the neddy is huge. If the pia nasalise the neddy and the neddy nasalise the pia then the pia does not like the neddy. If the pia is huge and the pia is somatic then the pia hunch the neddy. If the pia does not chase the neddy then the pia nasalise the neddy. If someone hunch the neddy then the neddy is somatic. If someone is mute and not somatic then they do not like the pia. The pia does not chase the pia.", "logic": "\nHuge(neddy)\nAspheric(neddy)\nHunch(neddy, pia)\nNasalise(neddy, pia)\nSkirt(pia, neddy)\nAttired(pia)\nHuge(pia)\nSomatic(pia)\nnot Aspheric(pia)\nMute(pia)\nHunch(pia, neddy)\nnot Nasalise(pia, neddy)\nnot Skirt(neddy, pia) and not Nasalise(neddy, pia) -> Huge(neddy)\nNasalise(pia, neddy) and Nasalise(neddy, pia) -> not Hunch(pia, neddy)\nHuge(pia) and Somatic(pia) -> Hunch(pia, neddy)\nnot Skirt(pia, neddy) -> Nasalise(pia, neddy)\nforall x (Hunch(x, neddy) -> Somatic(neddy))\nforall x (Mute(x) and not Somatic(x) -> not Hunch(x, pia))\n\nnot Skirt(pia, pia)\n\nnot Skirt(pia, pia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1275"} {"premises": "The kalli is quebecois. The kalli is rushlike. The kalli moot the kathrine. The kalli calve the kathrine. The kathrine whinny the kalli. The kathrine is nauruan. The kathrine is quebecois. The kathrine is zestful. The kathrine is not rushlike. The kathrine is luxurious. The kathrine moot the kalli. The kathrine does not need the kalli. If the kalli does not chase the kathrine and the kalli does not need the kathrine then the kalli is quebecois. If the kathrine calve the kalli and the kalli calve the kathrine then the kathrine does not like the kalli. If the kathrine is quebecois and the kathrine is zestful then the kathrine moot the kalli. If the kathrine does not chase the kalli then the kathrine calve the kalli. If someone moot the kalli then the kalli is zestful. If someone is luxurious and not zestful then they do not like the kathrine. The kalli whinny the kalli.", "logic": "\nQuebecois(kalli)\nRushlike(kalli)\nMoot(kalli, kathrine)\nCalve(kalli, kathrine)\nWhinny(kathrine, kalli)\nNauruan(kathrine)\nQuebecois(kathrine)\nZestful(kathrine)\nnot Rushlike(kathrine)\nLuxurious(kathrine)\nMoot(kathrine, kalli)\nnot Calve(kathrine, kalli)\nnot Whinny(kalli, kathrine) and not Calve(kalli, kathrine) -> Quebecois(kalli)\nCalve(kathrine, kalli) and Calve(kalli, kathrine) -> not Moot(kathrine, kalli)\nQuebecois(kathrine) and Zestful(kathrine) -> Moot(kathrine, kalli)\nnot Whinny(kathrine, kalli) -> Calve(kathrine, kalli)\nforall x (Moot(x, kalli) -> Zestful(kalli))\nforall x (Luxurious(x) and not Zestful(x) -> not Moot(x, kathrine))\n\nWhinny(kalli, kalli)\n\nWhinny(kalli, kalli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1275"} {"premises": "The demetri does not eat the rawley. The demetri is secretory. The rawley detest the lorelei. The rawley sprinkle the lorelei. The rawley is groveling. The rawley bedizen the demetri. The lorelei detest the demetri. The lorelei does not chase the rawley. The lorelei sprinkle the demetri. The lorelei sprinkle the rawley. If someone sprinkle the lorelei then they are secretory. If someone bedizen the lorelei then the lorelei does not visit the demetri. If the rawley sprinkle the lorelei then the lorelei bedizen the rawley. If someone bedizen the rawley then they visit the lorelei. If someone detest the rawley and they are alchemic then they eat the rawley. If the rawley bedizen the demetri then the rawley sprinkle the demetri. If someone is alchemic then they chase the rawley. If someone sprinkle the demetri and they are communist then the demetri sprinkle the lorelei. The lorelei sprinkle the rawley.", "logic": "\nnot Sprinkle(demetri, rawley)\nSecretory(demetri)\nDetest(rawley, lorelei)\nSprinkle(rawley, lorelei)\nGroveling(rawley)\nBedizen(rawley, demetri)\nDetest(lorelei, demetri)\nnot Detest(lorelei, rawley)\nSprinkle(lorelei, demetri)\nSprinkle(lorelei, rawley)\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, lorelei) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Bedizen(x, lorelei) -> not Bedizen(lorelei, demetri))\nSprinkle(rawley, lorelei) -> Bedizen(lorelei, rawley)\nforall x (Bedizen(x, rawley) -> Bedizen(x, lorelei))\nforall x (Detest(x, rawley) and Alchemic(x) -> Sprinkle(x, rawley))\nBedizen(rawley, demetri) -> Sprinkle(rawley, demetri)\nforall x (Alchemic(x) -> Detest(x, rawley))\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, demetri) and Communist(x) -> Sprinkle(demetri, lorelei))\n\nSprinkle(lorelei, rawley)\n\ntherefore Sprinkle(lorelei, rawley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The ninetta does not eat the beck. The ninetta is prototypic. The beck cannon the gunilla. The beck resonate the gunilla. The beck is glazed. The beck schlep the ninetta. The gunilla cannon the ninetta. The gunilla does not chase the beck. The gunilla resonate the ninetta. The gunilla resonate the beck. If someone resonate the gunilla then they are prototypic. If someone schlep the gunilla then the gunilla does not visit the ninetta. If the beck resonate the gunilla then the gunilla schlep the beck. If someone schlep the beck then they visit the gunilla. If someone cannon the beck and they are splayfoot then they eat the beck. If the beck schlep the ninetta then the beck resonate the ninetta. If someone is splayfoot then they chase the beck. If someone resonate the ninetta and they are pert then the ninetta resonate the gunilla. The gunilla does not eat the beck.", "logic": "\nnot Resonate(ninetta, beck)\nPrototypic(ninetta)\nCannon(beck, gunilla)\nResonate(beck, gunilla)\nGlazed(beck)\nSchlep(beck, ninetta)\nCannon(gunilla, ninetta)\nnot Cannon(gunilla, beck)\nResonate(gunilla, ninetta)\nResonate(gunilla, beck)\nforall x (Resonate(x, gunilla) -> Prototypic(x))\nforall x (Schlep(x, gunilla) -> not Schlep(gunilla, ninetta))\nResonate(beck, gunilla) -> Schlep(gunilla, beck)\nforall x (Schlep(x, beck) -> Schlep(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Cannon(x, beck) and Splayfoot(x) -> Resonate(x, beck))\nSchlep(beck, ninetta) -> Resonate(beck, ninetta)\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) -> Cannon(x, beck))\nforall x (Resonate(x, ninetta) and Pert(x) -> Resonate(ninetta, gunilla))\n\nnot Resonate(gunilla, beck)\n\ntherefore Resonate(gunilla, beck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The tyrone does not eat the antin. The tyrone is advanced. The antin exasperate the chantal. The antin chaw the chantal. The antin is asserting. The antin prang the tyrone. The chantal exasperate the tyrone. The chantal does not chase the antin. The chantal chaw the tyrone. The chantal chaw the antin. If someone chaw the chantal then they are advanced. If someone prang the chantal then the chantal does not visit the tyrone. If the antin chaw the chantal then the chantal prang the antin. If someone prang the antin then they visit the chantal. If someone exasperate the antin and they are pathologic then they eat the antin. If the antin prang the tyrone then the antin chaw the tyrone. If someone is pathologic then they chase the antin. If someone chaw the tyrone and they are clear then the tyrone chaw the chantal. The antin chaw the tyrone.", "logic": "\nnot Chaw(tyrone, antin)\nAdvanced(tyrone)\nExasperate(antin, chantal)\nChaw(antin, chantal)\nAsserting(antin)\nPrang(antin, tyrone)\nExasperate(chantal, tyrone)\nnot Exasperate(chantal, antin)\nChaw(chantal, tyrone)\nChaw(chantal, antin)\nforall x (Chaw(x, chantal) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Prang(x, chantal) -> not Prang(chantal, tyrone))\nChaw(antin, chantal) -> Prang(chantal, antin)\nforall x (Prang(x, antin) -> Prang(x, chantal))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, antin) and Pathologic(x) -> Chaw(x, antin))\nPrang(antin, tyrone) -> Chaw(antin, tyrone)\nforall x (Pathologic(x) -> Exasperate(x, antin))\nforall x (Chaw(x, tyrone) and Clear(x) -> Chaw(tyrone, chantal))\n\nChaw(antin, tyrone)\n\nPrang(antin, tyrone) and Prang(antin, tyrone) -> Chaw(antin, tyrone) -> therefore Chaw(antin, tyrone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The aime does not eat the rafaelia. The aime is borated. The rafaelia submerse the erminie. The rafaelia ionise the erminie. The rafaelia is upbeat. The rafaelia mobilize the aime. The erminie submerse the aime. The erminie does not chase the rafaelia. The erminie ionise the aime. The erminie ionise the rafaelia. If someone ionise the erminie then they are borated. If someone mobilize the erminie then the erminie does not visit the aime. If the rafaelia ionise the erminie then the erminie mobilize the rafaelia. If someone mobilize the rafaelia then they visit the erminie. If someone submerse the rafaelia and they are waxen then they eat the rafaelia. If the rafaelia mobilize the aime then the rafaelia ionise the aime. If someone is waxen then they chase the rafaelia. If someone ionise the aime and they are after then the aime ionise the erminie. The rafaelia does not eat the aime.", "logic": "\nnot Ionise(aime, rafaelia)\nBorated(aime)\nSubmerse(rafaelia, erminie)\nIonise(rafaelia, erminie)\nUpbeat(rafaelia)\nMobilize(rafaelia, aime)\nSubmerse(erminie, aime)\nnot Submerse(erminie, rafaelia)\nIonise(erminie, aime)\nIonise(erminie, rafaelia)\nforall x (Ionise(x, erminie) -> Borated(x))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, erminie) -> not Mobilize(erminie, aime))\nIonise(rafaelia, erminie) -> Mobilize(erminie, rafaelia)\nforall x (Mobilize(x, rafaelia) -> Mobilize(x, erminie))\nforall x (Submerse(x, rafaelia) and Waxen(x) -> Ionise(x, rafaelia))\nMobilize(rafaelia, aime) -> Ionise(rafaelia, aime)\nforall x (Waxen(x) -> Submerse(x, rafaelia))\nforall x (Ionise(x, aime) and After(x) -> Ionise(aime, erminie))\n\nnot Ionise(rafaelia, aime)\n\nMobilize(rafaelia, aime) and Mobilize(rafaelia, aime) -> Ionise(rafaelia, aime) -> therefore Ionise(rafaelia, aime)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The annadiana does not eat the sianna. The annadiana is chuffed. The sianna bandage the ronni. The sianna inspissate the ronni. The sianna is bicolour. The sianna netmail the annadiana. The ronni bandage the annadiana. The ronni does not chase the sianna. The ronni inspissate the annadiana. The ronni inspissate the sianna. If someone inspissate the ronni then they are chuffed. If someone netmail the ronni then the ronni does not visit the annadiana. If the sianna inspissate the ronni then the ronni netmail the sianna. If someone netmail the sianna then they visit the ronni. If someone bandage the sianna and they are unironed then they eat the sianna. If the sianna netmail the annadiana then the sianna inspissate the annadiana. If someone is unironed then they chase the sianna. If someone inspissate the annadiana and they are norwegian then the annadiana inspissate the ronni. The ronni netmail the ronni.", "logic": "\nnot Inspissate(annadiana, sianna)\nChuffed(annadiana)\nBandage(sianna, ronni)\nInspissate(sianna, ronni)\nBicolour(sianna)\nNetmail(sianna, annadiana)\nBandage(ronni, annadiana)\nnot Bandage(ronni, sianna)\nInspissate(ronni, annadiana)\nInspissate(ronni, sianna)\nforall x (Inspissate(x, ronni) -> Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Netmail(x, ronni) -> not Netmail(ronni, annadiana))\nInspissate(sianna, ronni) -> Netmail(ronni, sianna)\nforall x (Netmail(x, sianna) -> Netmail(x, ronni))\nforall x (Bandage(x, sianna) and Unironed(x) -> Inspissate(x, sianna))\nNetmail(sianna, annadiana) -> Inspissate(sianna, annadiana)\nforall x (Unironed(x) -> Bandage(x, sianna))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, annadiana) and Norwegian(x) -> Inspissate(annadiana, ronni))\n\nNetmail(ronni, ronni)\n\nInspissate(sianna, ronni) and Inspissate(sianna, ronni) -> Netmail(ronni, sianna) -> therefore Netmail(ronni, sianna) Netmail(ronni, sianna) and forall x (Netmail(x, sianna) -> Netmail(x, ronni)) -> therefore Netmail(ronni, ronni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The alethea does not eat the etienne. The alethea is pendulous. The etienne mate the thayne. The etienne severalize the thayne. The etienne is believable. The etienne absent the alethea. The thayne mate the alethea. The thayne does not chase the etienne. The thayne severalize the alethea. The thayne severalize the etienne. If someone severalize the thayne then they are pendulous. If someone absent the thayne then the thayne does not visit the alethea. If the etienne severalize the thayne then the thayne absent the etienne. If someone absent the etienne then they visit the thayne. If someone mate the etienne and they are greater then they eat the etienne. If the etienne absent the alethea then the etienne severalize the alethea. If someone is greater then they chase the etienne. If someone severalize the alethea and they are ancillary then the alethea severalize the thayne. The thayne does not visit the thayne.", "logic": "\nnot Severalize(alethea, etienne)\nPendulous(alethea)\nMate(etienne, thayne)\nSeveralize(etienne, thayne)\nBelievable(etienne)\nAbsent(etienne, alethea)\nMate(thayne, alethea)\nnot Mate(thayne, etienne)\nSeveralize(thayne, alethea)\nSeveralize(thayne, etienne)\nforall x (Severalize(x, thayne) -> Pendulous(x))\nforall x (Absent(x, thayne) -> not Absent(thayne, alethea))\nSeveralize(etienne, thayne) -> Absent(thayne, etienne)\nforall x (Absent(x, etienne) -> Absent(x, thayne))\nforall x (Mate(x, etienne) and Greater(x) -> Severalize(x, etienne))\nAbsent(etienne, alethea) -> Severalize(etienne, alethea)\nforall x (Greater(x) -> Mate(x, etienne))\nforall x (Severalize(x, alethea) and Ancillary(x) -> Severalize(alethea, thayne))\n\nnot Absent(thayne, thayne)\n\nSeveralize(etienne, thayne) and Severalize(etienne, thayne) -> Absent(thayne, etienne) -> therefore Absent(thayne, etienne) Absent(thayne, etienne) and forall x (Absent(x, etienne) -> Absent(x, thayne)) -> therefore Absent(thayne, thayne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The hyacintha does not eat the dugan. The hyacintha is dissuasive. The dugan mush the david. The dugan barrage the david. The dugan is drooping. The dugan jitterbug the hyacintha. The david mush the hyacintha. The david does not chase the dugan. The david barrage the hyacintha. The david barrage the dugan. If someone barrage the david then they are dissuasive. If someone jitterbug the david then the david does not visit the hyacintha. If the dugan barrage the david then the david jitterbug the dugan. If someone jitterbug the dugan then they visit the david. If someone mush the dugan and they are payable then they eat the dugan. If the dugan jitterbug the hyacintha then the dugan barrage the hyacintha. If someone is payable then they chase the dugan. If someone barrage the hyacintha and they are postmortal then the hyacintha barrage the david. The david does not visit the hyacintha.", "logic": "\nnot Barrage(hyacintha, dugan)\nDissuasive(hyacintha)\nMush(dugan, david)\nBarrage(dugan, david)\nDrooping(dugan)\nJitterbug(dugan, hyacintha)\nMush(david, hyacintha)\nnot Mush(david, dugan)\nBarrage(david, hyacintha)\nBarrage(david, dugan)\nforall x (Barrage(x, david) -> Dissuasive(x))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, david) -> not Jitterbug(david, hyacintha))\nBarrage(dugan, david) -> Jitterbug(david, dugan)\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, dugan) -> Jitterbug(x, david))\nforall x (Mush(x, dugan) and Payable(x) -> Barrage(x, dugan))\nJitterbug(dugan, hyacintha) -> Barrage(dugan, hyacintha)\nforall x (Payable(x) -> Mush(x, dugan))\nforall x (Barrage(x, hyacintha) and Postmortal(x) -> Barrage(hyacintha, david))\n\nnot Jitterbug(david, hyacintha)\n\nBarrage(dugan, david) and Barrage(dugan, david) -> Jitterbug(david, dugan) -> therefore Jitterbug(david, dugan) Jitterbug(david, dugan) and forall x (Jitterbug(x, dugan) -> Jitterbug(x, david)) -> therefore Jitterbug(david, david) Jitterbug(david, david) and forall x (Jitterbug(x, david) -> not Jitterbug(david, hyacintha)) -> therefore not Jitterbug(david, hyacintha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The tobie does not eat the claus. The tobie is landlocked. The claus destress the butler. The claus amount the butler. The claus is cutaneous. The claus spin the tobie. The butler destress the tobie. The butler does not chase the claus. The butler amount the tobie. The butler amount the claus. If someone amount the butler then they are landlocked. If someone spin the butler then the butler does not visit the tobie. If the claus amount the butler then the butler spin the claus. If someone spin the claus then they visit the butler. If someone destress the claus and they are abnaki then they eat the claus. If the claus spin the tobie then the claus amount the tobie. If someone is abnaki then they chase the claus. If someone amount the tobie and they are avionic then the tobie amount the butler. The butler spin the tobie.", "logic": "\nnot Amount(tobie, claus)\nLandlocked(tobie)\nDestress(claus, butler)\nAmount(claus, butler)\nCutaneous(claus)\nSpin(claus, tobie)\nDestress(butler, tobie)\nnot Destress(butler, claus)\nAmount(butler, tobie)\nAmount(butler, claus)\nforall x (Amount(x, butler) -> Landlocked(x))\nforall x (Spin(x, butler) -> not Spin(butler, tobie))\nAmount(claus, butler) -> Spin(butler, claus)\nforall x (Spin(x, claus) -> Spin(x, butler))\nforall x (Destress(x, claus) and Abnaki(x) -> Amount(x, claus))\nSpin(claus, tobie) -> Amount(claus, tobie)\nforall x (Abnaki(x) -> Destress(x, claus))\nforall x (Amount(x, tobie) and Avionic(x) -> Amount(tobie, butler))\n\nSpin(butler, tobie)\n\nAmount(claus, butler) and Amount(claus, butler) -> Spin(butler, claus) -> therefore Spin(butler, claus) Spin(butler, claus) and forall x (Spin(x, claus) -> Spin(x, butler)) -> therefore Spin(butler, butler) Spin(butler, butler) and forall x (Spin(x, butler) -> not Spin(butler, tobie)) -> therefore not Spin(butler, tobie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The stanleigh does not eat the waldo. The stanleigh is saxicolous. The waldo reschedule the claire. The waldo lunch the claire. The waldo is idealistic. The waldo exasperate the stanleigh. The claire reschedule the stanleigh. The claire does not chase the waldo. The claire lunch the stanleigh. The claire lunch the waldo. If someone lunch the claire then they are saxicolous. If someone exasperate the claire then the claire does not visit the stanleigh. If the waldo lunch the claire then the claire exasperate the waldo. If someone exasperate the waldo then they visit the claire. If someone reschedule the waldo and they are smooth then they eat the waldo. If the waldo exasperate the stanleigh then the waldo lunch the stanleigh. If someone is smooth then they chase the waldo. If someone lunch the stanleigh and they are adscript then the stanleigh lunch the claire. The waldo does not chase the waldo.", "logic": "\nnot Lunch(stanleigh, waldo)\nSaxicolous(stanleigh)\nReschedule(waldo, claire)\nLunch(waldo, claire)\nIdealistic(waldo)\nExasperate(waldo, stanleigh)\nReschedule(claire, stanleigh)\nnot Reschedule(claire, waldo)\nLunch(claire, stanleigh)\nLunch(claire, waldo)\nforall x (Lunch(x, claire) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, claire) -> not Exasperate(claire, stanleigh))\nLunch(waldo, claire) -> Exasperate(claire, waldo)\nforall x (Exasperate(x, waldo) -> Exasperate(x, claire))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, waldo) and Smooth(x) -> Lunch(x, waldo))\nExasperate(waldo, stanleigh) -> Lunch(waldo, stanleigh)\nforall x (Smooth(x) -> Reschedule(x, waldo))\nforall x (Lunch(x, stanleigh) and Adscript(x) -> Lunch(stanleigh, claire))\n\nnot Reschedule(waldo, waldo)\n\nforall x (Smooth(x) -> Reschedule(x, waldo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The sholom does not eat the belia. The sholom is ethnic. The belia bolt the clarinda. The belia enhance the clarinda. The belia is argentine. The belia slur the sholom. The clarinda bolt the sholom. The clarinda does not chase the belia. The clarinda enhance the sholom. The clarinda enhance the belia. If someone enhance the clarinda then they are ethnic. If someone slur the clarinda then the clarinda does not visit the sholom. If the belia enhance the clarinda then the clarinda slur the belia. If someone slur the belia then they visit the clarinda. If someone bolt the belia and they are ossiculate then they eat the belia. If the belia slur the sholom then the belia enhance the sholom. If someone is ossiculate then they chase the belia. If someone enhance the sholom and they are defamatory then the sholom enhance the clarinda. The clarinda is ethnic.", "logic": "\nnot Enhance(sholom, belia)\nEthnic(sholom)\nBolt(belia, clarinda)\nEnhance(belia, clarinda)\nArgentine(belia)\nSlur(belia, sholom)\nBolt(clarinda, sholom)\nnot Bolt(clarinda, belia)\nEnhance(clarinda, sholom)\nEnhance(clarinda, belia)\nforall x (Enhance(x, clarinda) -> Ethnic(x))\nforall x (Slur(x, clarinda) -> not Slur(clarinda, sholom))\nEnhance(belia, clarinda) -> Slur(clarinda, belia)\nforall x (Slur(x, belia) -> Slur(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Bolt(x, belia) and Ossiculate(x) -> Enhance(x, belia))\nSlur(belia, sholom) -> Enhance(belia, sholom)\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Bolt(x, belia))\nforall x (Enhance(x, sholom) and Defamatory(x) -> Enhance(sholom, clarinda))\n\nEthnic(clarinda)\n\nforall x (Enhance(x, clarinda) -> Ethnic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The jude does not eat the alice. The jude is amerindic. The alice defect the monroe. The alice tack the monroe. The alice is bandy. The alice worm the jude. The monroe defect the jude. The monroe does not chase the alice. The monroe tack the jude. The monroe tack the alice. If someone tack the monroe then they are amerindic. If someone worm the monroe then the monroe does not visit the jude. If the alice tack the monroe then the monroe worm the alice. If someone worm the alice then they visit the monroe. If someone defect the alice and they are unaddicted then they eat the alice. If the alice worm the jude then the alice tack the jude. If someone is unaddicted then they chase the alice. If someone tack the jude and they are armillary then the jude tack the monroe. The alice does not visit the monroe.", "logic": "\nnot Tack(jude, alice)\nAmerindic(jude)\nDefect(alice, monroe)\nTack(alice, monroe)\nBandy(alice)\nWorm(alice, jude)\nDefect(monroe, jude)\nnot Defect(monroe, alice)\nTack(monroe, jude)\nTack(monroe, alice)\nforall x (Tack(x, monroe) -> Amerindic(x))\nforall x (Worm(x, monroe) -> not Worm(monroe, jude))\nTack(alice, monroe) -> Worm(monroe, alice)\nforall x (Worm(x, alice) -> Worm(x, monroe))\nforall x (Defect(x, alice) and Unaddicted(x) -> Tack(x, alice))\nWorm(alice, jude) -> Tack(alice, jude)\nforall x (Unaddicted(x) -> Defect(x, alice))\nforall x (Tack(x, jude) and Armillary(x) -> Tack(jude, monroe))\n\nnot Worm(alice, monroe)\n\nforall x (Worm(x, alice) -> Worm(x, monroe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The helyn does not eat the gustavo. The helyn is fatless. The gustavo mask the jefferey. The gustavo anglicize the jefferey. The gustavo is inapposite. The gustavo advise the helyn. The jefferey mask the helyn. The jefferey does not chase the gustavo. The jefferey anglicize the helyn. The jefferey anglicize the gustavo. If someone anglicize the jefferey then they are fatless. If someone advise the jefferey then the jefferey does not visit the helyn. If the gustavo anglicize the jefferey then the jefferey advise the gustavo. If someone advise the gustavo then they visit the jefferey. If someone mask the gustavo and they are unrelieved then they eat the gustavo. If the gustavo advise the helyn then the gustavo anglicize the helyn. If someone is unrelieved then they chase the gustavo. If someone anglicize the helyn and they are sombre then the helyn anglicize the jefferey. The helyn anglicize the jefferey.", "logic": "\nnot Anglicize(helyn, gustavo)\nFatless(helyn)\nMask(gustavo, jefferey)\nAnglicize(gustavo, jefferey)\nInapposite(gustavo)\nAdvise(gustavo, helyn)\nMask(jefferey, helyn)\nnot Mask(jefferey, gustavo)\nAnglicize(jefferey, helyn)\nAnglicize(jefferey, gustavo)\nforall x (Anglicize(x, jefferey) -> Fatless(x))\nforall x (Advise(x, jefferey) -> not Advise(jefferey, helyn))\nAnglicize(gustavo, jefferey) -> Advise(jefferey, gustavo)\nforall x (Advise(x, gustavo) -> Advise(x, jefferey))\nforall x (Mask(x, gustavo) and Unrelieved(x) -> Anglicize(x, gustavo))\nAdvise(gustavo, helyn) -> Anglicize(gustavo, helyn)\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Mask(x, gustavo))\nforall x (Anglicize(x, helyn) and Sombre(x) -> Anglicize(helyn, jefferey))\n\nAnglicize(helyn, jefferey)\n\nforall x (Anglicize(x, helyn) and Sombre(x) -> Anglicize(helyn, jefferey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The hallam does not eat the jayme. The hallam is vagrant. The jayme dogsled the vibhu. The jayme deaminate the vibhu. The jayme is naive. The jayme joggle the hallam. The vibhu dogsled the hallam. The vibhu does not chase the jayme. The vibhu deaminate the hallam. The vibhu deaminate the jayme. If someone deaminate the vibhu then they are vagrant. If someone joggle the vibhu then the vibhu does not visit the hallam. If the jayme deaminate the vibhu then the vibhu joggle the jayme. If someone joggle the jayme then they visit the vibhu. If someone dogsled the jayme and they are saxicoline then they eat the jayme. If the jayme joggle the hallam then the jayme deaminate the hallam. If someone is saxicoline then they chase the jayme. If someone deaminate the hallam and they are articulate then the hallam deaminate the vibhu. The jayme is not articulate.", "logic": "\nnot Deaminate(hallam, jayme)\nVagrant(hallam)\nDogsled(jayme, vibhu)\nDeaminate(jayme, vibhu)\nNaive(jayme)\nJoggle(jayme, hallam)\nDogsled(vibhu, hallam)\nnot Dogsled(vibhu, jayme)\nDeaminate(vibhu, hallam)\nDeaminate(vibhu, jayme)\nforall x (Deaminate(x, vibhu) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Joggle(x, vibhu) -> not Joggle(vibhu, hallam))\nDeaminate(jayme, vibhu) -> Joggle(vibhu, jayme)\nforall x (Joggle(x, jayme) -> Joggle(x, vibhu))\nforall x (Dogsled(x, jayme) and Saxicoline(x) -> Deaminate(x, jayme))\nJoggle(jayme, hallam) -> Deaminate(jayme, hallam)\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Dogsled(x, jayme))\nforall x (Deaminate(x, hallam) and Articulate(x) -> Deaminate(hallam, vibhu))\n\nnot Articulate(jayme)\n\nnot Articulate(jayme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The jana does not eat the elsie. The jana is crusted. The elsie ream the taryn. The elsie bullyrag the taryn. The elsie is beaming. The elsie bowdlerize the jana. The taryn ream the jana. The taryn does not chase the elsie. The taryn bullyrag the jana. The taryn bullyrag the elsie. If someone bullyrag the taryn then they are crusted. If someone bowdlerize the taryn then the taryn does not visit the jana. If the elsie bullyrag the taryn then the taryn bowdlerize the elsie. If someone bowdlerize the elsie then they visit the taryn. If someone ream the elsie and they are epidermic then they eat the elsie. If the elsie bowdlerize the jana then the elsie bullyrag the jana. If someone is epidermic then they chase the elsie. If someone bullyrag the jana and they are antsy then the jana bullyrag the taryn. The elsie ream the jana.", "logic": "\nnot Bullyrag(jana, elsie)\nCrusted(jana)\nReam(elsie, taryn)\nBullyrag(elsie, taryn)\nBeaming(elsie)\nBowdlerize(elsie, jana)\nReam(taryn, jana)\nnot Ream(taryn, elsie)\nBullyrag(taryn, jana)\nBullyrag(taryn, elsie)\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, taryn) -> Crusted(x))\nforall x (Bowdlerize(x, taryn) -> not Bowdlerize(taryn, jana))\nBullyrag(elsie, taryn) -> Bowdlerize(taryn, elsie)\nforall x (Bowdlerize(x, elsie) -> Bowdlerize(x, taryn))\nforall x (Ream(x, elsie) and Epidermic(x) -> Bullyrag(x, elsie))\nBowdlerize(elsie, jana) -> Bullyrag(elsie, jana)\nforall x (Epidermic(x) -> Ream(x, elsie))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, jana) and Antsy(x) -> Bullyrag(jana, taryn))\n\nReam(elsie, jana)\n\nReam(elsie, jana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The eartha does not eat the royce. The eartha is laciniate. The royce cannulate the niccolo. The royce detour the niccolo. The royce is calcitic. The royce core the eartha. The niccolo cannulate the eartha. The niccolo does not chase the royce. The niccolo detour the eartha. The niccolo detour the royce. If someone detour the niccolo then they are laciniate. If someone core the niccolo then the niccolo does not visit the eartha. If the royce detour the niccolo then the niccolo core the royce. If someone core the royce then they visit the niccolo. If someone cannulate the royce and they are allegoric then they eat the royce. If the royce core the eartha then the royce detour the eartha. If someone is allegoric then they chase the royce. If someone detour the eartha and they are separable then the eartha detour the niccolo. The eartha is not separable.", "logic": "\nnot Detour(eartha, royce)\nLaciniate(eartha)\nCannulate(royce, niccolo)\nDetour(royce, niccolo)\nCalcitic(royce)\nCore(royce, eartha)\nCannulate(niccolo, eartha)\nnot Cannulate(niccolo, royce)\nDetour(niccolo, eartha)\nDetour(niccolo, royce)\nforall x (Detour(x, niccolo) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Core(x, niccolo) -> not Core(niccolo, eartha))\nDetour(royce, niccolo) -> Core(niccolo, royce)\nforall x (Core(x, royce) -> Core(x, niccolo))\nforall x (Cannulate(x, royce) and Allegoric(x) -> Detour(x, royce))\nCore(royce, eartha) -> Detour(royce, eartha)\nforall x (Allegoric(x) -> Cannulate(x, royce))\nforall x (Detour(x, eartha) and Separable(x) -> Detour(eartha, niccolo))\n\nnot Separable(eartha)\n\nnot Separable(eartha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "The isabel does not eat the lane. The isabel is workable. The lane lionise the guinna. The lane betide the guinna. The lane is untutored. The lane varnish the isabel. The guinna lionise the isabel. The guinna does not chase the lane. The guinna betide the isabel. The guinna betide the lane. If someone betide the guinna then they are workable. If someone varnish the guinna then the guinna does not visit the isabel. If the lane betide the guinna then the guinna varnish the lane. If someone varnish the lane then they visit the guinna. If someone lionise the lane and they are mural then they eat the lane. If the lane varnish the isabel then the lane betide the isabel. If someone is mural then they chase the lane. If someone betide the isabel and they are hidrotic then the isabel betide the guinna. The isabel lionise the isabel.", "logic": "\nnot Betide(isabel, lane)\nWorkable(isabel)\nLionise(lane, guinna)\nBetide(lane, guinna)\nUntutored(lane)\nVarnish(lane, isabel)\nLionise(guinna, isabel)\nnot Lionise(guinna, lane)\nBetide(guinna, isabel)\nBetide(guinna, lane)\nforall x (Betide(x, guinna) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Varnish(x, guinna) -> not Varnish(guinna, isabel))\nBetide(lane, guinna) -> Varnish(guinna, lane)\nforall x (Varnish(x, lane) -> Varnish(x, guinna))\nforall x (Lionise(x, lane) and Mural(x) -> Betide(x, lane))\nVarnish(lane, isabel) -> Betide(lane, isabel)\nforall x (Mural(x) -> Lionise(x, lane))\nforall x (Betide(x, isabel) and Hidrotic(x) -> Betide(isabel, guinna))\n\nLionise(isabel, isabel)\n\nLionise(isabel, isabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1357"} {"premises": "Bette is orthogonal. Bette is tusked. Bette is menial. Bette is dactylic. Bette is novel. Bette is sadducean. Bette is phonologic. Don is orthogonal. Don is dactylic. Don is novel. Don is sadducean. Don is phonologic. Smart things are tusked. Don is sadducean.", "logic": "\nOrthogonal(bette)\nTusked(bette)\nMenial(bette)\nDactylic(bette)\nNovel(bette)\nSadducean(bette)\nPhonologic(bette)\nOrthogonal(don)\nDactylic(don)\nNovel(don)\nSadducean(don)\nPhonologic(don)\nforall x (Novel(x) -> Tusked(x))\n\nSadducean(don)\n\ntherefore Sadducean(don)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-290"} {"premises": "Carita is mandibular. Carita is astringent. Carita is grasping. Carita is slaveless. Carita is markovian. Carita is abducent. Carita is culpable. Joli is mandibular. Joli is slaveless. Joli is markovian. Joli is abducent. Joli is culpable. Smart things are astringent. Carita is not markovian.", "logic": "\nMandibular(carita)\nAstringent(carita)\nGrasping(carita)\nSlaveless(carita)\nMarkovian(carita)\nAbducent(carita)\nCulpable(carita)\nMandibular(joli)\nSlaveless(joli)\nMarkovian(joli)\nAbducent(joli)\nCulpable(joli)\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Astringent(x))\n\nnot Markovian(carita)\n\ntherefore Markovian(carita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-290"} {"premises": "Mandi is purposive. Mandi is zestful. Mandi is misshapen. Mandi is almighty. Mandi is endemical. Mandi is uricosuric. Mandi is potholed. Georgia is purposive. Georgia is almighty. Georgia is endemical. Georgia is uricosuric. Georgia is potholed. Smart things are zestful. Georgia is zestful.", "logic": "\nPurposive(mandi)\nZestful(mandi)\nMisshapen(mandi)\nAlmighty(mandi)\nEndemical(mandi)\nUricosuric(mandi)\nPotholed(mandi)\nPurposive(georgia)\nAlmighty(georgia)\nEndemical(georgia)\nUricosuric(georgia)\nPotholed(georgia)\nforall x (Endemical(x) -> Zestful(x))\n\nZestful(georgia)\n\nEndemical(georgia) and forall x (Endemical(x) -> Zestful(x)) -> therefore Zestful(georgia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-290"} {"premises": "Sussi is acellular. Sussi is twilled. Sussi is conniving. Sussi is cataleptic. Sussi is cyanogenic. Sussi is mitotic. Sussi is antimonial. Merline is acellular. Merline is cataleptic. Merline is cyanogenic. Merline is mitotic. Merline is antimonial. Smart things are twilled. Merline is not twilled.", "logic": "\nAcellular(sussi)\nTwilled(sussi)\nConniving(sussi)\nCataleptic(sussi)\nCyanogenic(sussi)\nMitotic(sussi)\nAntimonial(sussi)\nAcellular(merline)\nCataleptic(merline)\nCyanogenic(merline)\nMitotic(merline)\nAntimonial(merline)\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) -> Twilled(x))\n\nnot Twilled(merline)\n\nCyanogenic(merline) and forall x (Cyanogenic(x) -> Twilled(x)) -> therefore Twilled(merline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-290"} {"premises": "Chane is ivied. Chane is not miasmal. Chane is pedigreed. Odilia is deathly. Odilia is untaxed. Odilia is not miasmal. Odilia is unbeknown. Staffard is deweyan. Staffard is untaxed. Staffard is miasmal. Staffard is unbeknown. Staffard is pedigreed. All deathly people are deweyan. All miasmal, untaxed people are unbeknown. If Odilia is deweyan and Odilia is not miasmal then Odilia is deathly. Big, deathly people are pedigreed. Big, untaxed people are deathly. If someone is untaxed and not miasmal then they are deathly. If Chane is deathly then Chane is not untaxed. If someone is unbeknown and not pedigreed then they are not ivied. Odilia is unbeknown.", "logic": "\nIvied(chane)\nnot Miasmal(chane)\nPedigreed(chane)\nDeathly(odilia)\nUntaxed(odilia)\nnot Miasmal(odilia)\nUnbeknown(odilia)\nDeweyan(staffard)\nUntaxed(staffard)\nMiasmal(staffard)\nUnbeknown(staffard)\nPedigreed(staffard)\nforall x (Deathly(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Unbeknown(x))\nDeweyan(odilia) and not Miasmal(odilia) -> Deathly(odilia)\nforall x (Deweyan(x) and Deathly(x) -> Pedigreed(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Deathly(x))\nforall x (Untaxed(x) and not Miasmal(x) -> Deathly(x))\nDeathly(chane) -> not Untaxed(chane)\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) and not Pedigreed(x) -> not Ivied(x))\n\nUnbeknown(odilia)\n\ntherefore Unbeknown(odilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Roxy is brackish. Roxy is not allopatric. Roxy is chassidic. Darb is encyclical. Darb is recurved. Darb is not allopatric. Darb is unoriginal. Nicoli is asexual. Nicoli is recurved. Nicoli is allopatric. Nicoli is unoriginal. Nicoli is chassidic. All encyclical people are asexual. All allopatric, recurved people are unoriginal. If Darb is asexual and Darb is not allopatric then Darb is encyclical. Big, encyclical people are chassidic. Big, recurved people are encyclical. If someone is recurved and not allopatric then they are encyclical. If Roxy is encyclical then Roxy is not recurved. If someone is unoriginal and not chassidic then they are not brackish. Nicoli is not asexual.", "logic": "\nBrackish(roxy)\nnot Allopatric(roxy)\nChassidic(roxy)\nEncyclical(darb)\nRecurved(darb)\nnot Allopatric(darb)\nUnoriginal(darb)\nAsexual(nicoli)\nRecurved(nicoli)\nAllopatric(nicoli)\nUnoriginal(nicoli)\nChassidic(nicoli)\nforall x (Encyclical(x) -> Asexual(x))\nforall x (Allopatric(x) and Recurved(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nAsexual(darb) and not Allopatric(darb) -> Encyclical(darb)\nforall x (Asexual(x) and Encyclical(x) -> Chassidic(x))\nforall x (Asexual(x) and Recurved(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nforall x (Recurved(x) and not Allopatric(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nEncyclical(roxy) -> not Recurved(roxy)\nforall x (Unoriginal(x) and not Chassidic(x) -> not Brackish(x))\n\nnot Asexual(nicoli)\n\ntherefore Asexual(nicoli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Geeta is belated. Geeta is not effected. Geeta is sometime. Justina is telescopic. Justina is kuwaiti. Justina is not effected. Justina is saxicolous. Karoline is secretive. Karoline is kuwaiti. Karoline is effected. Karoline is saxicolous. Karoline is sometime. All telescopic people are secretive. All effected, kuwaiti people are saxicolous. If Justina is secretive and Justina is not effected then Justina is telescopic. Big, telescopic people are sometime. Big, kuwaiti people are telescopic. If someone is kuwaiti and not effected then they are telescopic. If Geeta is telescopic then Geeta is not kuwaiti. If someone is saxicolous and not sometime then they are not belated. Karoline is telescopic.", "logic": "\nBelated(geeta)\nnot Effected(geeta)\nSometime(geeta)\nTelescopic(justina)\nKuwaiti(justina)\nnot Effected(justina)\nSaxicolous(justina)\nSecretive(karoline)\nKuwaiti(karoline)\nEffected(karoline)\nSaxicolous(karoline)\nSometime(karoline)\nforall x (Telescopic(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Effected(x) and Kuwaiti(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nSecretive(justina) and not Effected(justina) -> Telescopic(justina)\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Telescopic(x) -> Sometime(x))\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Kuwaiti(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nforall x (Kuwaiti(x) and not Effected(x) -> Telescopic(x))\nTelescopic(geeta) -> not Kuwaiti(geeta)\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and not Sometime(x) -> not Belated(x))\n\nTelescopic(karoline)\n\nSecretive(karoline) and Kuwaiti(karoline) and forall x (Secretive(x) and Kuwaiti(x) -> Telescopic(x)) -> therefore Telescopic(karoline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Cathrin is cumulous. Cathrin is not apteral. Cathrin is positivist. Perri is anguished. Perri is nonsexual. Perri is not apteral. Perri is poorly. Allissa is high. Allissa is nonsexual. Allissa is apteral. Allissa is poorly. Allissa is positivist. All anguished people are high. All apteral, nonsexual people are poorly. If Perri is high and Perri is not apteral then Perri is anguished. Big, anguished people are positivist. Big, nonsexual people are anguished. If someone is nonsexual and not apteral then they are anguished. If Cathrin is anguished then Cathrin is not nonsexual. If someone is poorly and not positivist then they are not cumulous. Allissa is not anguished.", "logic": "\nCumulous(cathrin)\nnot Apteral(cathrin)\nPositivist(cathrin)\nAnguished(perri)\nNonsexual(perri)\nnot Apteral(perri)\nPoorly(perri)\nHigh(allissa)\nNonsexual(allissa)\nApteral(allissa)\nPoorly(allissa)\nPositivist(allissa)\nforall x (Anguished(x) -> High(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) and Nonsexual(x) -> Poorly(x))\nHigh(perri) and not Apteral(perri) -> Anguished(perri)\nforall x (High(x) and Anguished(x) -> Positivist(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Nonsexual(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) and not Apteral(x) -> Anguished(x))\nAnguished(cathrin) -> not Nonsexual(cathrin)\nforall x (Poorly(x) and not Positivist(x) -> not Cumulous(x))\n\nnot Anguished(allissa)\n\nHigh(allissa) and Nonsexual(allissa) and forall x (High(x) and Nonsexual(x) -> Anguished(x)) -> therefore Anguished(allissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Vikky is unsubdued. Vikky is not hoary. Vikky is allopatric. Yetty is broadband. Yetty is tomboyish. Yetty is not hoary. Yetty is jowly. Carolynn is unfilmed. Carolynn is tomboyish. Carolynn is hoary. Carolynn is jowly. Carolynn is allopatric. All broadband people are unfilmed. All hoary, tomboyish people are jowly. If Yetty is unfilmed and Yetty is not hoary then Yetty is broadband. Big, broadband people are allopatric. Big, tomboyish people are broadband. If someone is tomboyish and not hoary then they are broadband. If Vikky is broadband then Vikky is not tomboyish. If someone is jowly and not allopatric then they are not unsubdued. Yetty is allopatric.", "logic": "\nUnsubdued(vikky)\nnot Hoary(vikky)\nAllopatric(vikky)\nBroadband(yetty)\nTomboyish(yetty)\nnot Hoary(yetty)\nJowly(yetty)\nUnfilmed(carolynn)\nTomboyish(carolynn)\nHoary(carolynn)\nJowly(carolynn)\nAllopatric(carolynn)\nforall x (Broadband(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\nforall x (Hoary(x) and Tomboyish(x) -> Jowly(x))\nUnfilmed(yetty) and not Hoary(yetty) -> Broadband(yetty)\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) and Broadband(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) and Tomboyish(x) -> Broadband(x))\nforall x (Tomboyish(x) and not Hoary(x) -> Broadband(x))\nBroadband(vikky) -> not Tomboyish(vikky)\nforall x (Jowly(x) and not Allopatric(x) -> not Unsubdued(x))\n\nAllopatric(yetty)\n\nBroadband(yetty) and forall x (Broadband(x) -> Unfilmed(x)) -> therefore Unfilmed(yetty) Unfilmed(yetty) and Broadband(yetty) and forall x (Unfilmed(x) and Broadband(x) -> Allopatric(x)) -> therefore Allopatric(yetty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Yancey is silky. Yancey is not suspected. Yancey is starry. Eddy is untanned. Eddy is impeded. Eddy is not suspected. Eddy is precise. Vernice is quarterly. Vernice is impeded. Vernice is suspected. Vernice is precise. Vernice is starry. All untanned people are quarterly. All suspected, impeded people are precise. If Eddy is quarterly and Eddy is not suspected then Eddy is untanned. Big, untanned people are starry. Big, impeded people are untanned. If someone is impeded and not suspected then they are untanned. If Yancey is untanned then Yancey is not impeded. If someone is precise and not starry then they are not silky. Eddy is not starry.", "logic": "\nSilky(yancey)\nnot Suspected(yancey)\nStarry(yancey)\nUntanned(eddy)\nImpeded(eddy)\nnot Suspected(eddy)\nPrecise(eddy)\nQuarterly(vernice)\nImpeded(vernice)\nSuspected(vernice)\nPrecise(vernice)\nStarry(vernice)\nforall x (Untanned(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Suspected(x) and Impeded(x) -> Precise(x))\nQuarterly(eddy) and not Suspected(eddy) -> Untanned(eddy)\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and Untanned(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and Impeded(x) -> Untanned(x))\nforall x (Impeded(x) and not Suspected(x) -> Untanned(x))\nUntanned(yancey) -> not Impeded(yancey)\nforall x (Precise(x) and not Starry(x) -> not Silky(x))\n\nnot Starry(eddy)\n\nUntanned(eddy) and forall x (Untanned(x) -> Quarterly(x)) -> therefore Quarterly(eddy) Quarterly(eddy) and Untanned(eddy) and forall x (Quarterly(x) and Untanned(x) -> Starry(x)) -> therefore Starry(eddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Birgitta is rancid. Birgitta is not katabatic. Birgitta is surmisable. Alla is attired. Alla is lowborn. Alla is not katabatic. Alla is convincing. Elton is veritable. Elton is lowborn. Elton is katabatic. Elton is convincing. Elton is surmisable. All attired people are veritable. All katabatic, lowborn people are convincing. If Alla is veritable and Alla is not katabatic then Alla is attired. Big, attired people are surmisable. Big, lowborn people are attired. If someone is lowborn and not katabatic then they are attired. If Birgitta is attired then Birgitta is not lowborn. If someone is convincing and not surmisable then they are not rancid. Birgitta is not attired.", "logic": "\nRancid(birgitta)\nnot Katabatic(birgitta)\nSurmisable(birgitta)\nAttired(alla)\nLowborn(alla)\nnot Katabatic(alla)\nConvincing(alla)\nVeritable(elton)\nLowborn(elton)\nKatabatic(elton)\nConvincing(elton)\nSurmisable(elton)\nforall x (Attired(x) -> Veritable(x))\nforall x (Katabatic(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Convincing(x))\nVeritable(alla) and not Katabatic(alla) -> Attired(alla)\nforall x (Veritable(x) and Attired(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Veritable(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) and not Katabatic(x) -> Attired(x))\nAttired(birgitta) -> not Lowborn(birgitta)\nforall x (Convincing(x) and not Surmisable(x) -> not Rancid(x))\n\nnot Attired(birgitta)\n\nforall x (Veritable(x) and Lowborn(x) -> Attired(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Perri is precise. Perri is not aquiferous. Perri is multilane. Churchill is verbalized. Churchill is trackable. Churchill is not aquiferous. Churchill is busted. Arvind is tenanted. Arvind is trackable. Arvind is aquiferous. Arvind is busted. Arvind is multilane. All verbalized people are tenanted. All aquiferous, trackable people are busted. If Churchill is tenanted and Churchill is not aquiferous then Churchill is verbalized. Big, verbalized people are multilane. Big, trackable people are verbalized. If someone is trackable and not aquiferous then they are verbalized. If Perri is verbalized then Perri is not trackable. If someone is busted and not multilane then they are not precise. Perri is tenanted.", "logic": "\nPrecise(perri)\nnot Aquiferous(perri)\nMultilane(perri)\nVerbalized(churchill)\nTrackable(churchill)\nnot Aquiferous(churchill)\nBusted(churchill)\nTenanted(arvind)\nTrackable(arvind)\nAquiferous(arvind)\nBusted(arvind)\nMultilane(arvind)\nforall x (Verbalized(x) -> Tenanted(x))\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) and Trackable(x) -> Busted(x))\nTenanted(churchill) and not Aquiferous(churchill) -> Verbalized(churchill)\nforall x (Tenanted(x) and Verbalized(x) -> Multilane(x))\nforall x (Tenanted(x) and Trackable(x) -> Verbalized(x))\nforall x (Trackable(x) and not Aquiferous(x) -> Verbalized(x))\nVerbalized(perri) -> not Trackable(perri)\nforall x (Busted(x) and not Multilane(x) -> not Precise(x))\n\nTenanted(perri)\n\nforall x (Verbalized(x) -> Tenanted(x)) <- forall x (Tenanted(x) and Trackable(x) -> Verbalized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Ora is rigorous. Ora is not curdled. Ora is tuscan. Desiri is baccate. Desiri is wanton. Desiri is not curdled. Desiri is baffling. Sayre is lustreless. Sayre is wanton. Sayre is curdled. Sayre is baffling. Sayre is tuscan. All baccate people are lustreless. All curdled, wanton people are baffling. If Desiri is lustreless and Desiri is not curdled then Desiri is baccate. Big, baccate people are tuscan. Big, wanton people are baccate. If someone is wanton and not curdled then they are baccate. If Ora is baccate then Ora is not wanton. If someone is baffling and not tuscan then they are not rigorous. Ora is not baffling.", "logic": "\nRigorous(ora)\nnot Curdled(ora)\nTuscan(ora)\nBaccate(desiri)\nWanton(desiri)\nnot Curdled(desiri)\nBaffling(desiri)\nLustreless(sayre)\nWanton(sayre)\nCurdled(sayre)\nBaffling(sayre)\nTuscan(sayre)\nforall x (Baccate(x) -> Lustreless(x))\nforall x (Curdled(x) and Wanton(x) -> Baffling(x))\nLustreless(desiri) and not Curdled(desiri) -> Baccate(desiri)\nforall x (Lustreless(x) and Baccate(x) -> Tuscan(x))\nforall x (Lustreless(x) and Wanton(x) -> Baccate(x))\nforall x (Wanton(x) and not Curdled(x) -> Baccate(x))\nBaccate(ora) -> not Wanton(ora)\nforall x (Baffling(x) and not Tuscan(x) -> not Rigorous(x))\n\nnot Baffling(ora)\n\nforall x (Curdled(x) and Wanton(x) -> Baffling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Phaidra is serrate. Phaidra is not unhealthy. Phaidra is meritable. Bee is isochronal. Bee is masterful. Bee is not unhealthy. Bee is bare. Mellisa is unenforced. Mellisa is masterful. Mellisa is unhealthy. Mellisa is bare. Mellisa is meritable. All isochronal people are unenforced. All unhealthy, masterful people are bare. If Bee is unenforced and Bee is not unhealthy then Bee is isochronal. Big, isochronal people are meritable. Big, masterful people are isochronal. If someone is masterful and not unhealthy then they are isochronal. If Phaidra is isochronal then Phaidra is not masterful. If someone is bare and not meritable then they are not serrate. Mellisa is serrate.", "logic": "\nSerrate(phaidra)\nnot Unhealthy(phaidra)\nMeritable(phaidra)\nIsochronal(bee)\nMasterful(bee)\nnot Unhealthy(bee)\nBare(bee)\nUnenforced(mellisa)\nMasterful(mellisa)\nUnhealthy(mellisa)\nBare(mellisa)\nMeritable(mellisa)\nforall x (Isochronal(x) -> Unenforced(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) and Masterful(x) -> Bare(x))\nUnenforced(bee) and not Unhealthy(bee) -> Isochronal(bee)\nforall x (Unenforced(x) and Isochronal(x) -> Meritable(x))\nforall x (Unenforced(x) and Masterful(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nforall x (Masterful(x) and not Unhealthy(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nIsochronal(phaidra) -> not Masterful(phaidra)\nforall x (Bare(x) and not Meritable(x) -> not Serrate(x))\n\nSerrate(mellisa)\n\nSerrate(mellisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Ana is scalable. Ana is not bald. Ana is wary. Athena is penumbral. Athena is stormbound. Athena is not bald. Athena is floaty. Marcus is booted. Marcus is stormbound. Marcus is bald. Marcus is floaty. Marcus is wary. All penumbral people are booted. All bald, stormbound people are floaty. If Athena is booted and Athena is not bald then Athena is penumbral. Big, penumbral people are wary. Big, stormbound people are penumbral. If someone is stormbound and not bald then they are penumbral. If Ana is penumbral then Ana is not stormbound. If someone is floaty and not wary then they are not scalable. Athena is not scalable.", "logic": "\nScalable(ana)\nnot Bald(ana)\nWary(ana)\nPenumbral(athena)\nStormbound(athena)\nnot Bald(athena)\nFloaty(athena)\nBooted(marcus)\nStormbound(marcus)\nBald(marcus)\nFloaty(marcus)\nWary(marcus)\nforall x (Penumbral(x) -> Booted(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Stormbound(x) -> Floaty(x))\nBooted(athena) and not Bald(athena) -> Penumbral(athena)\nforall x (Booted(x) and Penumbral(x) -> Wary(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) and Stormbound(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nforall x (Stormbound(x) and not Bald(x) -> Penumbral(x))\nPenumbral(ana) -> not Stormbound(ana)\nforall x (Floaty(x) and not Wary(x) -> not Scalable(x))\n\nnot Scalable(athena)\n\nnot Scalable(athena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "Ware is ropey. Ware is not tacky. Ware is imprudent. Taddeo is himalayan. Taddeo is rushed. Taddeo is not tacky. Taddeo is scrupulous. Hersch is nonnomadic. Hersch is rushed. Hersch is tacky. Hersch is scrupulous. Hersch is imprudent. All himalayan people are nonnomadic. All tacky, rushed people are scrupulous. If Taddeo is nonnomadic and Taddeo is not tacky then Taddeo is himalayan. Big, himalayan people are imprudent. Big, rushed people are himalayan. If someone is rushed and not tacky then they are himalayan. If Ware is himalayan then Ware is not rushed. If someone is scrupulous and not imprudent then they are not ropey. Ware is rushed.", "logic": "\nRopey(ware)\nnot Tacky(ware)\nImprudent(ware)\nHimalayan(taddeo)\nRushed(taddeo)\nnot Tacky(taddeo)\nScrupulous(taddeo)\nNonnomadic(hersch)\nRushed(hersch)\nTacky(hersch)\nScrupulous(hersch)\nImprudent(hersch)\nforall x (Himalayan(x) -> Nonnomadic(x))\nforall x (Tacky(x) and Rushed(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nNonnomadic(taddeo) and not Tacky(taddeo) -> Himalayan(taddeo)\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) and Himalayan(x) -> Imprudent(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) and Rushed(x) -> Himalayan(x))\nforall x (Rushed(x) and not Tacky(x) -> Himalayan(x))\nHimalayan(ware) -> not Rushed(ware)\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and not Imprudent(x) -> not Ropey(x))\n\nRushed(ware)\n\nRushed(ware) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1546"} {"premises": "The sari is empyrean. The sari does not see the jules. The jules coincide the sari. If someone is empyrean then they see the sari. The sari does not see the jules.", "logic": "\nEmpyrean(sari)\nnot Gesture(sari, jules)\nCoincide(jules, sari)\nforall x (Empyrean(x) -> Gesture(x, sari))\n\nnot Gesture(sari, jules)\n\ntherefore not Gesture(sari, jules)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "The melitta is downstream. The melitta does not see the allegra. The allegra wring the melitta. If someone is downstream then they see the melitta. The melitta citrate the allegra.", "logic": "\nDownstream(melitta)\nnot Citrate(melitta, allegra)\nWring(allegra, melitta)\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> Citrate(x, melitta))\n\nCitrate(melitta, allegra)\n\ntherefore not Citrate(melitta, allegra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "The rolfe is speechless. The rolfe does not see the cornie. The cornie kneel the rolfe. If someone is speechless then they see the rolfe. The rolfe rhumba the rolfe.", "logic": "\nSpeechless(rolfe)\nnot Rhumba(rolfe, cornie)\nKneel(cornie, rolfe)\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Rhumba(x, rolfe))\n\nRhumba(rolfe, rolfe)\n\nSpeechless(rolfe) and forall x (Speechless(x) -> Rhumba(x, rolfe)) -> therefore Rhumba(rolfe, rolfe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "The skelly is unvalued. The skelly does not see the charmian. The charmian fraction the skelly. If someone is unvalued then they see the skelly. The skelly does not see the skelly.", "logic": "\nUnvalued(skelly)\nnot Founder(skelly, charmian)\nFraction(charmian, skelly)\nforall x (Unvalued(x) -> Founder(x, skelly))\n\nnot Founder(skelly, skelly)\n\nUnvalued(skelly) and forall x (Unvalued(x) -> Founder(x, skelly)) -> therefore Founder(skelly, skelly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "The lukas is unleavened. The lukas does not see the rosaline. The rosaline slump the lukas. If someone is unleavened then they see the lukas. The rosaline does not see the lukas.", "logic": "\nUnleavened(lukas)\nnot Indent(lukas, rosaline)\nSlump(rosaline, lukas)\nforall x (Unleavened(x) -> Indent(x, lukas))\n\nnot Indent(rosaline, lukas)\n\nforall x (Unleavened(x) -> Indent(x, lukas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "The junina is rosaceous. The junina does not see the corliss. The corliss discharge the junina. If someone is rosaceous then they see the junina. The corliss is green.", "logic": "\nRosaceous(junina)\nnot Alchemize(junina, corliss)\nDischarge(corliss, junina)\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) -> Alchemize(x, junina))\n\nGreen(corliss)\n\nGreen(corliss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "The jennifer is brunette. The jennifer does not see the eyde. The eyde memorise the jennifer. If someone is brunette then they see the jennifer. The eyde is not nice.", "logic": "\nBrunette(jennifer)\nnot Jelly(jennifer, eyde)\nMemorise(eyde, jennifer)\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Jelly(x, jennifer))\n\nnot Nice(eyde)\n\nnot Nice(eyde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "The enya is darkish. The enya does not see the manda. The manda french the enya. If someone is darkish then they see the enya. The manda is darkish.", "logic": "\nDarkish(enya)\nnot Damage(enya, manda)\nFrench(manda, enya)\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> Damage(x, enya))\n\nDarkish(manda)\n\nDarkish(manda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-615"} {"premises": "Sheba is gilled. Sheba is encouraged. Sheba is imbecilic. Sheba is stinting. Edith is imbecilic. Edith is coming. Celestia is massive. Celestia is encouraged. Celestia is imbecilic. Celestia is not stinting. If Edith is encouraged then Edith is stinting. If something is episodic then it is imbecilic. If something is coming then it is imbecilic. All coming, encouraged things are imbecilic. All coming things are encouraged. If something is coming then it is encouraged. If something is gilled then it is encouraged. If something is stinting then it is episodic. Celestia is imbecilic.", "logic": "\nGilled(sheba)\nEncouraged(sheba)\nImbecilic(sheba)\nStinting(sheba)\nImbecilic(edith)\nComing(edith)\nMassive(celestia)\nEncouraged(celestia)\nImbecilic(celestia)\nnot Stinting(celestia)\nEncouraged(edith) -> Stinting(edith)\nforall x (Episodic(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Coming(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Coming(x) and Encouraged(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Coming(x) -> Encouraged(x))\nforall x (Coming(x) -> Encouraged(x))\nforall x (Gilled(x) -> Encouraged(x))\nforall x (Stinting(x) -> Episodic(x))\n\nImbecilic(celestia)\n\ntherefore Imbecilic(celestia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Rosalynd is suffering. Rosalynd is overeager. Rosalynd is seagirt. Rosalynd is forbidden. Caren is seagirt. Caren is italic. Gustavus is disabled. Gustavus is overeager. Gustavus is seagirt. Gustavus is not forbidden. If Caren is overeager then Caren is forbidden. If something is harsh then it is seagirt. If something is italic then it is seagirt. All italic, overeager things are seagirt. All italic things are overeager. If something is italic then it is overeager. If something is suffering then it is overeager. If something is forbidden then it is harsh. Gustavus is not overeager.", "logic": "\nSuffering(rosalynd)\nOvereager(rosalynd)\nSeagirt(rosalynd)\nForbidden(rosalynd)\nSeagirt(caren)\nItalic(caren)\nDisabled(gustavus)\nOvereager(gustavus)\nSeagirt(gustavus)\nnot Forbidden(gustavus)\nOvereager(caren) -> Forbidden(caren)\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Seagirt(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Seagirt(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) and Overeager(x) -> Seagirt(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Overeager(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Overeager(x))\nforall x (Suffering(x) -> Overeager(x))\nforall x (Forbidden(x) -> Harsh(x))\n\nnot Overeager(gustavus)\n\ntherefore Overeager(gustavus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Lianne is filial. Lianne is potbellied. Lianne is vibrant. Lianne is synoecious. Jourdan is vibrant. Jourdan is staunch. Paulina is hairless. Paulina is potbellied. Paulina is vibrant. Paulina is not synoecious. If Jourdan is potbellied then Jourdan is synoecious. If something is coppery then it is vibrant. If something is staunch then it is vibrant. All staunch, potbellied things are vibrant. All staunch things are potbellied. If something is staunch then it is potbellied. If something is filial then it is potbellied. If something is synoecious then it is coppery. Lianne is coppery.", "logic": "\nFilial(lianne)\nPotbellied(lianne)\nVibrant(lianne)\nSynoecious(lianne)\nVibrant(jourdan)\nStaunch(jourdan)\nHairless(paulina)\nPotbellied(paulina)\nVibrant(paulina)\nnot Synoecious(paulina)\nPotbellied(jourdan) -> Synoecious(jourdan)\nforall x (Coppery(x) -> Vibrant(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) -> Vibrant(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Vibrant(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Filial(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Synoecious(x) -> Coppery(x))\n\nCoppery(lianne)\n\nSynoecious(lianne) and forall x (Synoecious(x) -> Coppery(x)) -> therefore Coppery(lianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Harold is bent. Harold is looseleaf. Harold is noble. Harold is pricey. Suellen is noble. Suellen is voguish. Chaddie is unpeaceful. Chaddie is looseleaf. Chaddie is noble. Chaddie is not pricey. If Suellen is looseleaf then Suellen is pricey. If something is ribald then it is noble. If something is voguish then it is noble. All voguish, looseleaf things are noble. All voguish things are looseleaf. If something is voguish then it is looseleaf. If something is bent then it is looseleaf. If something is pricey then it is ribald. Suellen is not looseleaf.", "logic": "\nBent(harold)\nLooseleaf(harold)\nNoble(harold)\nPricey(harold)\nNoble(suellen)\nVoguish(suellen)\nUnpeaceful(chaddie)\nLooseleaf(chaddie)\nNoble(chaddie)\nnot Pricey(chaddie)\nLooseleaf(suellen) -> Pricey(suellen)\nforall x (Ribald(x) -> Noble(x))\nforall x (Voguish(x) -> Noble(x))\nforall x (Voguish(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> Noble(x))\nforall x (Voguish(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Voguish(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Bent(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Pricey(x) -> Ribald(x))\n\nnot Looseleaf(suellen)\n\nVoguish(suellen) and forall x (Voguish(x) -> Looseleaf(x)) -> therefore Looseleaf(suellen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Gabrielle is renal. Gabrielle is transonic. Gabrielle is pricy. Gabrielle is unalert. Karlotte is pricy. Karlotte is lovesome. Thane is nineteenth. Thane is transonic. Thane is pricy. Thane is not unalert. If Karlotte is transonic then Karlotte is unalert. If something is essene then it is pricy. If something is lovesome then it is pricy. All lovesome, transonic things are pricy. All lovesome things are transonic. If something is lovesome then it is transonic. If something is renal then it is transonic. If something is unalert then it is essene. Karlotte is unalert.", "logic": "\nRenal(gabrielle)\nTransonic(gabrielle)\nPricy(gabrielle)\nUnalert(gabrielle)\nPricy(karlotte)\nLovesome(karlotte)\nNineteenth(thane)\nTransonic(thane)\nPricy(thane)\nnot Unalert(thane)\nTransonic(karlotte) -> Unalert(karlotte)\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Pricy(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) -> Pricy(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) and Transonic(x) -> Pricy(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Renal(x) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) -> Essene(x))\n\nUnalert(karlotte)\n\nLovesome(karlotte) and forall x (Lovesome(x) -> Transonic(x)) -> therefore Transonic(karlotte) Transonic(karlotte) and Transonic(karlotte) -> Unalert(karlotte) -> therefore Unalert(karlotte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Koralle is scrimpy. Koralle is cephalic. Koralle is jealous. Koralle is summery. Georgetta is jealous. Georgetta is human. Enoch is concordant. Enoch is cephalic. Enoch is jealous. Enoch is not summery. If Georgetta is cephalic then Georgetta is summery. If something is snuffling then it is jealous. If something is human then it is jealous. All human, cephalic things are jealous. All human things are cephalic. If something is human then it is cephalic. If something is scrimpy then it is cephalic. If something is summery then it is snuffling. Georgetta is not summery.", "logic": "\nScrimpy(koralle)\nCephalic(koralle)\nJealous(koralle)\nSummery(koralle)\nJealous(georgetta)\nHuman(georgetta)\nConcordant(enoch)\nCephalic(enoch)\nJealous(enoch)\nnot Summery(enoch)\nCephalic(georgetta) -> Summery(georgetta)\nforall x (Snuffling(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Human(x) and Cephalic(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) -> Cephalic(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Snuffling(x))\n\nnot Summery(georgetta)\n\nHuman(georgetta) and forall x (Human(x) -> Cephalic(x)) -> therefore Cephalic(georgetta) Cephalic(georgetta) and Cephalic(georgetta) -> Summery(georgetta) -> therefore Summery(georgetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Jaquelyn is unparallel. Jaquelyn is umbrella. Jaquelyn is virtuoso. Jaquelyn is faustian. Bonni is virtuoso. Bonni is operatic. Melli is pillaged. Melli is umbrella. Melli is virtuoso. Melli is not faustian. If Bonni is umbrella then Bonni is faustian. If something is romanian then it is virtuoso. If something is operatic then it is virtuoso. All operatic, umbrella things are virtuoso. All operatic things are umbrella. If something is operatic then it is umbrella. If something is unparallel then it is umbrella. If something is faustian then it is romanian. Bonni is romanian.", "logic": "\nUnparallel(jaquelyn)\nUmbrella(jaquelyn)\nVirtuoso(jaquelyn)\nFaustian(jaquelyn)\nVirtuoso(bonni)\nOperatic(bonni)\nPillaged(melli)\nUmbrella(melli)\nVirtuoso(melli)\nnot Faustian(melli)\nUmbrella(bonni) -> Faustian(bonni)\nforall x (Romanian(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) and Umbrella(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) -> Umbrella(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) -> Umbrella(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Umbrella(x))\nforall x (Faustian(x) -> Romanian(x))\n\nRomanian(bonni)\n\nOperatic(bonni) and forall x (Operatic(x) -> Umbrella(x)) -> therefore Umbrella(bonni) Umbrella(bonni) and Umbrella(bonni) -> Faustian(bonni) -> therefore Faustian(bonni) Faustian(bonni) and forall x (Faustian(x) -> Romanian(x)) -> therefore Romanian(bonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Kerrie is unblushing. Kerrie is tentacled. Kerrie is smothered. Kerrie is dissolved. Netti is smothered. Netti is sectional. Ossie is xxxii. Ossie is tentacled. Ossie is smothered. Ossie is not dissolved. If Netti is tentacled then Netti is dissolved. If something is multistory then it is smothered. If something is sectional then it is smothered. All sectional, tentacled things are smothered. All sectional things are tentacled. If something is sectional then it is tentacled. If something is unblushing then it is tentacled. If something is dissolved then it is multistory. Netti is not multistory.", "logic": "\nUnblushing(kerrie)\nTentacled(kerrie)\nSmothered(kerrie)\nDissolved(kerrie)\nSmothered(netti)\nSectional(netti)\nXxxii(ossie)\nTentacled(ossie)\nSmothered(ossie)\nnot Dissolved(ossie)\nTentacled(netti) -> Dissolved(netti)\nforall x (Multistory(x) -> Smothered(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Smothered(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) and Tentacled(x) -> Smothered(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Dissolved(x) -> Multistory(x))\n\nnot Multistory(netti)\n\nSectional(netti) and forall x (Sectional(x) -> Tentacled(x)) -> therefore Tentacled(netti) Tentacled(netti) and Tentacled(netti) -> Dissolved(netti) -> therefore Dissolved(netti) Dissolved(netti) and forall x (Dissolved(x) -> Multistory(x)) -> therefore Multistory(netti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Reagan is southmost. Reagan is unwise. Reagan is apogamous. Reagan is powdered. Lizzy is apogamous. Lizzy is flammable. Glenine is boxlike. Glenine is unwise. Glenine is apogamous. Glenine is not powdered. If Lizzy is unwise then Lizzy is powdered. If something is awing then it is apogamous. If something is flammable then it is apogamous. All flammable, unwise things are apogamous. All flammable things are unwise. If something is flammable then it is unwise. If something is southmost then it is unwise. If something is powdered then it is awing. Glenine is not awing.", "logic": "\nSouthmost(reagan)\nUnwise(reagan)\nApogamous(reagan)\nPowdered(reagan)\nApogamous(lizzy)\nFlammable(lizzy)\nBoxlike(glenine)\nUnwise(glenine)\nApogamous(glenine)\nnot Powdered(glenine)\nUnwise(lizzy) -> Powdered(lizzy)\nforall x (Awing(x) -> Apogamous(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Apogamous(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) and Unwise(x) -> Apogamous(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Awing(x))\n\nnot Awing(glenine)\n\nforall x (Powdered(x) -> Awing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Joline is baculiform. Joline is rusty. Joline is cruciform. Joline is transposed. Monroe is cruciform. Monroe is semisoft. Briana is workable. Briana is rusty. Briana is cruciform. Briana is not transposed. If Monroe is rusty then Monroe is transposed. If something is ruddy then it is cruciform. If something is semisoft then it is cruciform. All semisoft, rusty things are cruciform. All semisoft things are rusty. If something is semisoft then it is rusty. If something is baculiform then it is rusty. If something is transposed then it is ruddy. Monroe is workable.", "logic": "\nBaculiform(joline)\nRusty(joline)\nCruciform(joline)\nTransposed(joline)\nCruciform(monroe)\nSemisoft(monroe)\nWorkable(briana)\nRusty(briana)\nCruciform(briana)\nnot Transposed(briana)\nRusty(monroe) -> Transposed(monroe)\nforall x (Ruddy(x) -> Cruciform(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Cruciform(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) and Rusty(x) -> Cruciform(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Baculiform(x) -> Rusty(x))\nforall x (Transposed(x) -> Ruddy(x))\n\nWorkable(monroe)\n\nWorkable(monroe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Barbabra is raped. Barbabra is homegrown. Barbabra is projecting. Barbabra is primary. Magda is projecting. Magda is falcate. Claretta is asquint. Claretta is homegrown. Claretta is projecting. Claretta is not primary. If Magda is homegrown then Magda is primary. If something is acceptant then it is projecting. If something is falcate then it is projecting. All falcate, homegrown things are projecting. All falcate things are homegrown. If something is falcate then it is homegrown. If something is raped then it is homegrown. If something is primary then it is acceptant. Claretta is not raped.", "logic": "\nRaped(barbabra)\nHomegrown(barbabra)\nProjecting(barbabra)\nPrimary(barbabra)\nProjecting(magda)\nFalcate(magda)\nAsquint(claretta)\nHomegrown(claretta)\nProjecting(claretta)\nnot Primary(claretta)\nHomegrown(magda) -> Primary(magda)\nforall x (Acceptant(x) -> Projecting(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Projecting(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) and Homegrown(x) -> Projecting(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Raped(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Acceptant(x))\n\nnot Raped(claretta)\n\nnot Raped(claretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Nannie is binominal. Nannie is impendent. Nannie is actinoid. Nannie is insidious. Imogen is actinoid. Imogen is cognisable. Eddi is lettered. Eddi is impendent. Eddi is actinoid. Eddi is not insidious. If Imogen is impendent then Imogen is insidious. If something is insatiable then it is actinoid. If something is cognisable then it is actinoid. All cognisable, impendent things are actinoid. All cognisable things are impendent. If something is cognisable then it is impendent. If something is binominal then it is impendent. If something is insidious then it is insatiable. Nannie is lettered.", "logic": "\nBinominal(nannie)\nImpendent(nannie)\nActinoid(nannie)\nInsidious(nannie)\nActinoid(imogen)\nCognisable(imogen)\nLettered(eddi)\nImpendent(eddi)\nActinoid(eddi)\nnot Insidious(eddi)\nImpendent(imogen) -> Insidious(imogen)\nforall x (Insatiable(x) -> Actinoid(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) -> Actinoid(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) and Impendent(x) -> Actinoid(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) -> Impendent(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) -> Impendent(x))\nforall x (Binominal(x) -> Impendent(x))\nforall x (Insidious(x) -> Insatiable(x))\n\nLettered(nannie)\n\nLettered(nannie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Hali is thievish. Hali is cocksure. Hali is melting. Hali is ravishing. Patty is melting. Patty is aeriform. Rafaelita is imprisoned. Rafaelita is cocksure. Rafaelita is melting. Rafaelita is not ravishing. If Patty is cocksure then Patty is ravishing. If something is temperate then it is melting. If something is aeriform then it is melting. All aeriform, cocksure things are melting. All aeriform things are cocksure. If something is aeriform then it is cocksure. If something is thievish then it is cocksure. If something is ravishing then it is temperate. Rafaelita is not aeriform.", "logic": "\nThievish(hali)\nCocksure(hali)\nMelting(hali)\nRavishing(hali)\nMelting(patty)\nAeriform(patty)\nImprisoned(rafaelita)\nCocksure(rafaelita)\nMelting(rafaelita)\nnot Ravishing(rafaelita)\nCocksure(patty) -> Ravishing(patty)\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Melting(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Melting(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) and Cocksure(x) -> Melting(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Cocksure(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Cocksure(x))\nforall x (Thievish(x) -> Cocksure(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) -> Temperate(x))\n\nnot Aeriform(rafaelita)\n\nnot Aeriform(rafaelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Hendrik is sunk. Hendrik is unshoed. Hendrik is merry. Hendrik is fortissimo. Warner is merry. Warner is east. Elicia is corporeal. Elicia is unshoed. Elicia is merry. Elicia is not fortissimo. If Warner is unshoed then Warner is fortissimo. If something is chesty then it is merry. If something is east then it is merry. All east, unshoed things are merry. All east things are unshoed. If something is east then it is unshoed. If something is sunk then it is unshoed. If something is fortissimo then it is chesty. Warner is sunk.", "logic": "\nSunk(hendrik)\nUnshoed(hendrik)\nMerry(hendrik)\nFortissimo(hendrik)\nMerry(warner)\nEast(warner)\nCorporeal(elicia)\nUnshoed(elicia)\nMerry(elicia)\nnot Fortissimo(elicia)\nUnshoed(warner) -> Fortissimo(warner)\nforall x (Chesty(x) -> Merry(x))\nforall x (East(x) -> Merry(x))\nforall x (East(x) and Unshoed(x) -> Merry(x))\nforall x (East(x) -> Unshoed(x))\nforall x (East(x) -> Unshoed(x))\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Unshoed(x))\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) -> Chesty(x))\n\nSunk(warner)\n\nSunk(warner) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1164"} {"premises": "Alaa is haywire. Frederich is haywire. Frederich is not limacine. Frederich is attrited. Frederich is manichaean. Winifred is haywire. Winifred is limacine. Winifred is manichaean. Mitchel is moblike. Mitchel is unshaved. Mitchel is ascendable. Mitchel is haywire. Mitchel is not limacine. Mitchel is not attrited. Mitchel is manichaean. If Winifred is haywire then Winifred is ascendable. If something is limacine and not unshaved then it is attrited. All unshaved, ascendable things are manichaean. Alaa is haywire.", "logic": "\nHaywire(alaa)\nHaywire(frederich)\nnot Limacine(frederich)\nAttrited(frederich)\nManichaean(frederich)\nHaywire(winifred)\nLimacine(winifred)\nManichaean(winifred)\nMoblike(mitchel)\nUnshaved(mitchel)\nAscendable(mitchel)\nHaywire(mitchel)\nnot Limacine(mitchel)\nnot Attrited(mitchel)\nManichaean(mitchel)\nHaywire(winifred) -> Ascendable(winifred)\nforall x (Limacine(x) and not Unshaved(x) -> Attrited(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) and Ascendable(x) -> Manichaean(x))\n\nHaywire(alaa)\n\ntherefore Haywire(alaa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Trudi is highbrowed. Wayland is highbrowed. Wayland is not fictional. Wayland is numeral. Wayland is mishnaic. Dov is highbrowed. Dov is fictional. Dov is mishnaic. Cristina is former. Cristina is nonmodern. Cristina is headed. Cristina is highbrowed. Cristina is not fictional. Cristina is not numeral. Cristina is mishnaic. If Dov is highbrowed then Dov is headed. If something is fictional and not nonmodern then it is numeral. All nonmodern, headed things are mishnaic. Wayland is fictional.", "logic": "\nHighbrowed(trudi)\nHighbrowed(wayland)\nnot Fictional(wayland)\nNumeral(wayland)\nMishnaic(wayland)\nHighbrowed(dov)\nFictional(dov)\nMishnaic(dov)\nFormer(cristina)\nNonmodern(cristina)\nHeaded(cristina)\nHighbrowed(cristina)\nnot Fictional(cristina)\nnot Numeral(cristina)\nMishnaic(cristina)\nHighbrowed(dov) -> Headed(dov)\nforall x (Fictional(x) and not Nonmodern(x) -> Numeral(x))\nforall x (Nonmodern(x) and Headed(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\n\nFictional(wayland)\n\ntherefore not Fictional(wayland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Suzanne is hearty. Kai is hearty. Kai is not copular. Kai is treeless. Kai is palliative. Tedda is hearty. Tedda is copular. Tedda is palliative. Rosemonde is plural. Rosemonde is throated. Rosemonde is conjunct. Rosemonde is hearty. Rosemonde is not copular. Rosemonde is not treeless. Rosemonde is palliative. If Tedda is hearty then Tedda is conjunct. If something is copular and not throated then it is treeless. All throated, conjunct things are palliative. Tedda is conjunct.", "logic": "\nHearty(suzanne)\nHearty(kai)\nnot Copular(kai)\nTreeless(kai)\nPalliative(kai)\nHearty(tedda)\nCopular(tedda)\nPalliative(tedda)\nPlural(rosemonde)\nThroated(rosemonde)\nConjunct(rosemonde)\nHearty(rosemonde)\nnot Copular(rosemonde)\nnot Treeless(rosemonde)\nPalliative(rosemonde)\nHearty(tedda) -> Conjunct(tedda)\nforall x (Copular(x) and not Throated(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Throated(x) and Conjunct(x) -> Palliative(x))\n\nConjunct(tedda)\n\nHearty(tedda) and Hearty(tedda) -> Conjunct(tedda) -> therefore Conjunct(tedda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Fowler is cardiac. Petrina is cardiac. Petrina is not visaged. Petrina is freelance. Petrina is underage. Mozelle is cardiac. Mozelle is visaged. Mozelle is underage. Taber is handy. Taber is profane. Taber is raised. Taber is cardiac. Taber is not visaged. Taber is not freelance. Taber is underage. If Mozelle is cardiac then Mozelle is raised. If something is visaged and not profane then it is freelance. All profane, raised things are underage. Mozelle is not raised.", "logic": "\nCardiac(fowler)\nCardiac(petrina)\nnot Visaged(petrina)\nFreelance(petrina)\nUnderage(petrina)\nCardiac(mozelle)\nVisaged(mozelle)\nUnderage(mozelle)\nHandy(taber)\nProfane(taber)\nRaised(taber)\nCardiac(taber)\nnot Visaged(taber)\nnot Freelance(taber)\nUnderage(taber)\nCardiac(mozelle) -> Raised(mozelle)\nforall x (Visaged(x) and not Profane(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Profane(x) and Raised(x) -> Underage(x))\n\nnot Raised(mozelle)\n\nCardiac(mozelle) and Cardiac(mozelle) -> Raised(mozelle) -> therefore Raised(mozelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Anatol is painterly. Muire is painterly. Muire is not bettering. Muire is local. Muire is noticeable. Jameson is painterly. Jameson is bettering. Jameson is noticeable. Revkah is ducal. Revkah is bauxitic. Revkah is comforting. Revkah is painterly. Revkah is not bettering. Revkah is not local. Revkah is noticeable. If Jameson is painterly then Jameson is comforting. If something is bettering and not bauxitic then it is local. All bauxitic, comforting things are noticeable. Jameson is not local.", "logic": "\nPainterly(anatol)\nPainterly(muire)\nnot Bettering(muire)\nLocal(muire)\nNoticeable(muire)\nPainterly(jameson)\nBettering(jameson)\nNoticeable(jameson)\nDucal(revkah)\nBauxitic(revkah)\nComforting(revkah)\nPainterly(revkah)\nnot Bettering(revkah)\nnot Local(revkah)\nNoticeable(revkah)\nPainterly(jameson) -> Comforting(jameson)\nforall x (Bettering(x) and not Bauxitic(x) -> Local(x))\nforall x (Bauxitic(x) and Comforting(x) -> Noticeable(x))\n\nnot Local(jameson)\n\nforall x (Bettering(x) and not Bauxitic(x) -> Local(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Nonna is unembodied. Huntley is unembodied. Huntley is not loosened. Huntley is accretive. Huntley is uveal. Sioux is unembodied. Sioux is loosened. Sioux is uveal. Gianna is rustproof. Gianna is prehensile. Gianna is paintable. Gianna is unembodied. Gianna is not loosened. Gianna is not accretive. Gianna is uveal. If Sioux is unembodied then Sioux is paintable. If something is loosened and not prehensile then it is accretive. All prehensile, paintable things are uveal. Nonna is uveal.", "logic": "\nUnembodied(nonna)\nUnembodied(huntley)\nnot Loosened(huntley)\nAccretive(huntley)\nUveal(huntley)\nUnembodied(sioux)\nLoosened(sioux)\nUveal(sioux)\nRustproof(gianna)\nPrehensile(gianna)\nPaintable(gianna)\nUnembodied(gianna)\nnot Loosened(gianna)\nnot Accretive(gianna)\nUveal(gianna)\nUnembodied(sioux) -> Paintable(sioux)\nforall x (Loosened(x) and not Prehensile(x) -> Accretive(x))\nforall x (Prehensile(x) and Paintable(x) -> Uveal(x))\n\nUveal(nonna)\n\nforall x (Prehensile(x) and Paintable(x) -> Uveal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Fonsie is botanic. Teriann is botanic. Teriann is not babyish. Teriann is effectual. Teriann is zany. Daisi is botanic. Daisi is babyish. Daisi is zany. Margalo is tenacious. Margalo is nigerian. Margalo is leafy. Margalo is botanic. Margalo is not babyish. Margalo is not effectual. Margalo is zany. If Daisi is botanic then Daisi is leafy. If something is babyish and not nigerian then it is effectual. All nigerian, leafy things are zany. Teriann is not nigerian.", "logic": "\nBotanic(fonsie)\nBotanic(teriann)\nnot Babyish(teriann)\nEffectual(teriann)\nZany(teriann)\nBotanic(daisi)\nBabyish(daisi)\nZany(daisi)\nTenacious(margalo)\nNigerian(margalo)\nLeafy(margalo)\nBotanic(margalo)\nnot Babyish(margalo)\nnot Effectual(margalo)\nZany(margalo)\nBotanic(daisi) -> Leafy(daisi)\nforall x (Babyish(x) and not Nigerian(x) -> Effectual(x))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) and Leafy(x) -> Zany(x))\n\nnot Nigerian(teriann)\n\nnot Nigerian(teriann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Hephzibah is burnable. Galen is burnable. Galen is not indisposed. Galen is thinkable. Galen is surprising. Kathlene is burnable. Kathlene is indisposed. Kathlene is surprising. Steve is drinkable. Steve is regnant. Steve is monogenic. Steve is burnable. Steve is not indisposed. Steve is not thinkable. Steve is surprising. If Kathlene is burnable then Kathlene is monogenic. If something is indisposed and not regnant then it is thinkable. All regnant, monogenic things are surprising. Hephzibah is drinkable.", "logic": "\nBurnable(hephzibah)\nBurnable(galen)\nnot Indisposed(galen)\nThinkable(galen)\nSurprising(galen)\nBurnable(kathlene)\nIndisposed(kathlene)\nSurprising(kathlene)\nDrinkable(steve)\nRegnant(steve)\nMonogenic(steve)\nBurnable(steve)\nnot Indisposed(steve)\nnot Thinkable(steve)\nSurprising(steve)\nBurnable(kathlene) -> Monogenic(kathlene)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and not Regnant(x) -> Thinkable(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Surprising(x))\n\nDrinkable(hephzibah)\n\nDrinkable(hephzibah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2046"} {"premises": "Letisha is alcoholic. Letisha is awaited. Letisha is bottommost. Gabbie is blockading. Gabbie is lost. Gabbie is dioecian. Rebe is blockading. Rebe is lost. Dolley is awaited. Dolley is lost. Cold things are alcoholic. All alcoholic things are awaited. If something is blockading then it is awaited. Cold, sedative things are bottommost. Cold, sedative things are lost. All awaited, dioecian things are sedative. Gabbie is lost.", "logic": "\nAlcoholic(letisha)\nAwaited(letisha)\nBottommost(letisha)\nBlockading(gabbie)\nLost(gabbie)\nDioecian(gabbie)\nBlockading(rebe)\nLost(rebe)\nAwaited(dolley)\nLost(dolley)\nforall x (Blockading(x) -> Alcoholic(x))\nforall x (Alcoholic(x) -> Awaited(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) -> Awaited(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Sedative(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Sedative(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Awaited(x) and Dioecian(x) -> Sedative(x))\n\nLost(gabbie)\n\ntherefore Lost(gabbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Skippy is awned. Skippy is texan. Skippy is tasseled. Sonya is terrene. Sonya is unpitying. Sonya is comburant. Ebba is terrene. Ebba is unpitying. Rik is texan. Rik is unpitying. Cold things are awned. All awned things are texan. If something is terrene then it is texan. Cold, eolithic things are tasseled. Cold, eolithic things are unpitying. All texan, comburant things are eolithic. Skippy is not awned.", "logic": "\nAwned(skippy)\nTexan(skippy)\nTasseled(skippy)\nTerrene(sonya)\nUnpitying(sonya)\nComburant(sonya)\nTerrene(ebba)\nUnpitying(ebba)\nTexan(rik)\nUnpitying(rik)\nforall x (Terrene(x) -> Awned(x))\nforall x (Awned(x) -> Texan(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) -> Texan(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Eolithic(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Eolithic(x) -> Unpitying(x))\nforall x (Texan(x) and Comburant(x) -> Eolithic(x))\n\nnot Awned(skippy)\n\ntherefore Awned(skippy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Kermie is chylaceous. Kermie is prussian. Kermie is tympanic. Magdaia is tottering. Magdaia is occasional. Magdaia is outsized. Berti is tottering. Berti is occasional. Oralie is prussian. Oralie is occasional. Cold things are chylaceous. All chylaceous things are prussian. If something is tottering then it is prussian. Cold, dismal things are tympanic. Cold, dismal things are occasional. All prussian, outsized things are dismal. Berti is chylaceous.", "logic": "\nChylaceous(kermie)\nPrussian(kermie)\nTympanic(kermie)\nTottering(magdaia)\nOccasional(magdaia)\nOutsized(magdaia)\nTottering(berti)\nOccasional(berti)\nPrussian(oralie)\nOccasional(oralie)\nforall x (Tottering(x) -> Chylaceous(x))\nforall x (Chylaceous(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Tottering(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Tottering(x) and Dismal(x) -> Tympanic(x))\nforall x (Tottering(x) and Dismal(x) -> Occasional(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) and Outsized(x) -> Dismal(x))\n\nChylaceous(berti)\n\nTottering(berti) and forall x (Tottering(x) -> Chylaceous(x)) -> therefore Chylaceous(berti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Wilmar is defending. Wilmar is fictitious. Wilmar is xciv. Lorette is planned. Lorette is additive. Lorette is allegretto. Jenni is planned. Jenni is additive. Jillian is fictitious. Jillian is additive. Cold things are defending. All defending things are fictitious. If something is planned then it is fictitious. Cold, titillated things are xciv. Cold, titillated things are additive. All fictitious, allegretto things are titillated. Lorette is not defending.", "logic": "\nDefending(wilmar)\nFictitious(wilmar)\nXciv(wilmar)\nPlanned(lorette)\nAdditive(lorette)\nAllegretto(lorette)\nPlanned(jenni)\nAdditive(jenni)\nFictitious(jillian)\nAdditive(jillian)\nforall x (Planned(x) -> Defending(x))\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) -> Fictitious(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) and Titillated(x) -> Xciv(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) and Titillated(x) -> Additive(x))\nforall x (Fictitious(x) and Allegretto(x) -> Titillated(x))\n\nnot Defending(lorette)\n\nPlanned(lorette) and forall x (Planned(x) -> Defending(x)) -> therefore Defending(lorette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Benedict is excitant. Benedict is delphian. Benedict is negative. Laina is bacchic. Laina is bacterioid. Laina is dumbstruck. Wilden is bacchic. Wilden is bacterioid. Judi is delphian. Judi is bacterioid. Cold things are excitant. All excitant things are delphian. If something is bacchic then it is delphian. Cold, stoic things are negative. Cold, stoic things are bacterioid. All delphian, dumbstruck things are stoic. Laina is stoic.", "logic": "\nExcitant(benedict)\nDelphian(benedict)\nNegative(benedict)\nBacchic(laina)\nBacterioid(laina)\nDumbstruck(laina)\nBacchic(wilden)\nBacterioid(wilden)\nDelphian(judi)\nBacterioid(judi)\nforall x (Bacchic(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Stoic(x) -> Negative(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Stoic(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Delphian(x) and Dumbstruck(x) -> Stoic(x))\n\nStoic(laina)\n\nBacchic(laina) and forall x (Bacchic(x) -> Delphian(x)) -> therefore Delphian(laina) Delphian(laina) and Dumbstruck(laina) and forall x (Delphian(x) and Dumbstruck(x) -> Stoic(x)) -> therefore Stoic(laina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Maurise is volant. Maurise is ptolemaic. Maurise is congruent. Christ is gyral. Christ is leaky. Christ is babyish. Kirstin is gyral. Kirstin is leaky. Karlotta is ptolemaic. Karlotta is leaky. Cold things are volant. All volant things are ptolemaic. If something is gyral then it is ptolemaic. Cold, banausic things are congruent. Cold, banausic things are leaky. All ptolemaic, babyish things are banausic. Christ is not banausic.", "logic": "\nVolant(maurise)\nPtolemaic(maurise)\nCongruent(maurise)\nGyral(christ)\nLeaky(christ)\nBabyish(christ)\nGyral(kirstin)\nLeaky(kirstin)\nPtolemaic(karlotta)\nLeaky(karlotta)\nforall x (Gyral(x) -> Volant(x))\nforall x (Volant(x) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Gyral(x) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Gyral(x) and Banausic(x) -> Congruent(x))\nforall x (Gyral(x) and Banausic(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Babyish(x) -> Banausic(x))\n\nnot Banausic(christ)\n\nGyral(christ) and forall x (Gyral(x) -> Ptolemaic(x)) -> therefore Ptolemaic(christ) Ptolemaic(christ) and Babyish(christ) and forall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Babyish(x) -> Banausic(x)) -> therefore Banausic(christ)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Randene is histologic. Randene is funerary. Randene is bathyal. Sonia is pinnated. Sonia is levantine. Sonia is lvii. Sheelah is pinnated. Sheelah is levantine. Ellette is funerary. Ellette is levantine. Cold things are histologic. All histologic things are funerary. If something is pinnated then it is funerary. Cold, described things are bathyal. Cold, described things are levantine. All funerary, lvii things are described. Sonia is bathyal.", "logic": "\nHistologic(randene)\nFunerary(randene)\nBathyal(randene)\nPinnated(sonia)\nLevantine(sonia)\nLvii(sonia)\nPinnated(sheelah)\nLevantine(sheelah)\nFunerary(ellette)\nLevantine(ellette)\nforall x (Pinnated(x) -> Histologic(x))\nforall x (Histologic(x) -> Funerary(x))\nforall x (Pinnated(x) -> Funerary(x))\nforall x (Pinnated(x) and Described(x) -> Bathyal(x))\nforall x (Pinnated(x) and Described(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Funerary(x) and Lvii(x) -> Described(x))\n\nBathyal(sonia)\n\nPinnated(sonia) and forall x (Pinnated(x) -> Funerary(x)) -> therefore Funerary(sonia) Funerary(sonia) and Lvii(sonia) and forall x (Funerary(x) and Lvii(x) -> Described(x)) -> therefore Described(sonia) Pinnated(sonia) and Described(sonia) and forall x (Pinnated(x) and Described(x) -> Bathyal(x)) -> therefore Bathyal(sonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Albert is boeotian. Albert is sportive. Albert is floodlit. Berke is crazy. Berke is concrete. Berke is volatile. Adela is crazy. Adela is concrete. Spud is sportive. Spud is concrete. Cold things are boeotian. All boeotian things are sportive. If something is crazy then it is sportive. Cold, synoptic things are floodlit. Cold, synoptic things are concrete. All sportive, volatile things are synoptic. Berke is not floodlit.", "logic": "\nBoeotian(albert)\nSportive(albert)\nFloodlit(albert)\nCrazy(berke)\nConcrete(berke)\nVolatile(berke)\nCrazy(adela)\nConcrete(adela)\nSportive(spud)\nConcrete(spud)\nforall x (Crazy(x) -> Boeotian(x))\nforall x (Boeotian(x) -> Sportive(x))\nforall x (Crazy(x) -> Sportive(x))\nforall x (Crazy(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Floodlit(x))\nforall x (Crazy(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Concrete(x))\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Volatile(x) -> Synoptic(x))\n\nnot Floodlit(berke)\n\nCrazy(berke) and forall x (Crazy(x) -> Sportive(x)) -> therefore Sportive(berke) Sportive(berke) and Volatile(berke) and forall x (Sportive(x) and Volatile(x) -> Synoptic(x)) -> therefore Synoptic(berke) Crazy(berke) and Synoptic(berke) and forall x (Crazy(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Floodlit(x)) -> therefore Floodlit(berke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Maxfield is junoesque. Maxfield is erasable. Maxfield is brisk. Gerard is defensible. Gerard is draped. Gerard is aired. Algernon is defensible. Algernon is draped. Hayes is erasable. Hayes is draped. Cold things are junoesque. All junoesque things are erasable. If something is defensible then it is erasable. Cold, chylous things are brisk. Cold, chylous things are draped. All erasable, aired things are chylous. Hayes is not chylous.", "logic": "\nJunoesque(maxfield)\nErasable(maxfield)\nBrisk(maxfield)\nDefensible(gerard)\nDraped(gerard)\nAired(gerard)\nDefensible(algernon)\nDraped(algernon)\nErasable(hayes)\nDraped(hayes)\nforall x (Defensible(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Defensible(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Defensible(x) and Chylous(x) -> Brisk(x))\nforall x (Defensible(x) and Chylous(x) -> Draped(x))\nforall x (Erasable(x) and Aired(x) -> Chylous(x))\n\nnot Chylous(hayes)\n\nforall x (Erasable(x) and Aired(x) -> Chylous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Lois is cloudless. Lois is aforesaid. Lois is mongol. Jimmie is protected. Jimmie is calycine. Jimmie is idolatrous. Gretta is protected. Gretta is calycine. Lorrayne is aforesaid. Lorrayne is calycine. Cold things are cloudless. All cloudless things are aforesaid. If something is protected then it is aforesaid. Cold, upmost things are mongol. Cold, upmost things are calycine. All aforesaid, idolatrous things are upmost. Lorrayne is mongol.", "logic": "\nCloudless(lois)\nAforesaid(lois)\nMongol(lois)\nProtected(jimmie)\nCalycine(jimmie)\nIdolatrous(jimmie)\nProtected(gretta)\nCalycine(gretta)\nAforesaid(lorrayne)\nCalycine(lorrayne)\nforall x (Protected(x) -> Cloudless(x))\nforall x (Cloudless(x) -> Aforesaid(x))\nforall x (Protected(x) -> Aforesaid(x))\nforall x (Protected(x) and Upmost(x) -> Mongol(x))\nforall x (Protected(x) and Upmost(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Aforesaid(x) and Idolatrous(x) -> Upmost(x))\n\nMongol(lorrayne)\n\nforall x (Protected(x) and Upmost(x) -> Mongol(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Jim is wobbling. Jim is shrunken. Jim is surpassing. Emanuel is lemonlike. Emanuel is capable. Emanuel is linear. Edee is lemonlike. Edee is capable. Yuri is shrunken. Yuri is capable. Cold things are wobbling. All wobbling things are shrunken. If something is lemonlike then it is shrunken. Cold, aecial things are surpassing. Cold, aecial things are capable. All shrunken, linear things are aecial. Edee is not surpassing.", "logic": "\nWobbling(jim)\nShrunken(jim)\nSurpassing(jim)\nLemonlike(emanuel)\nCapable(emanuel)\nLinear(emanuel)\nLemonlike(edee)\nCapable(edee)\nShrunken(yuri)\nCapable(yuri)\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) -> Shrunken(x))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Shrunken(x))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) and Aecial(x) -> Surpassing(x))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) and Aecial(x) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) and Linear(x) -> Aecial(x))\n\nnot Surpassing(edee)\n\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) and Aecial(x) -> Surpassing(x)) <- forall x (Shrunken(x) and Linear(x) -> Aecial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Sherrie is ascitic. Sherrie is tubelike. Sherrie is inclined. Rozalin is able. Rozalin is witching. Rozalin is furlike. Isahella is able. Isahella is witching. Retha is tubelike. Retha is witching. Cold things are ascitic. All ascitic things are tubelike. If something is able then it is tubelike. Cold, frisky things are inclined. Cold, frisky things are witching. All tubelike, furlike things are frisky. Sherrie is witching.", "logic": "\nAscitic(sherrie)\nTubelike(sherrie)\nInclined(sherrie)\nAble(rozalin)\nWitching(rozalin)\nFurlike(rozalin)\nAble(isahella)\nWitching(isahella)\nTubelike(retha)\nWitching(retha)\nforall x (Able(x) -> Ascitic(x))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> Tubelike(x))\nforall x (Able(x) -> Tubelike(x))\nforall x (Able(x) and Frisky(x) -> Inclined(x))\nforall x (Able(x) and Frisky(x) -> Witching(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) and Furlike(x) -> Frisky(x))\n\nWitching(sherrie)\n\nforall x (Able(x) and Frisky(x) -> Witching(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Lilian is tinpot. Lilian is verbatim. Lilian is ponderous. Berni is utilised. Berni is overfond. Berni is covetous. Hansel is utilised. Hansel is overfond. Robinette is verbatim. Robinette is overfond. Cold things are tinpot. All tinpot things are verbatim. If something is utilised then it is verbatim. Cold, tumescent things are ponderous. Cold, tumescent things are overfond. All verbatim, covetous things are tumescent. Lilian is not covetous.", "logic": "\nTinpot(lilian)\nVerbatim(lilian)\nPonderous(lilian)\nUtilised(berni)\nOverfond(berni)\nCovetous(berni)\nUtilised(hansel)\nOverfond(hansel)\nVerbatim(robinette)\nOverfond(robinette)\nforall x (Utilised(x) -> Tinpot(x))\nforall x (Tinpot(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Utilised(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Tumescent(x) -> Ponderous(x))\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Tumescent(x) -> Overfond(x))\nforall x (Verbatim(x) and Covetous(x) -> Tumescent(x))\n\nnot Covetous(lilian)\n\nnot Covetous(lilian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Bradley is naive. Bradley is confiding. Bradley is liege. Virgil is bicolour. Virgil is sainted. Virgil is carbonylic. Kalila is bicolour. Kalila is sainted. Iolande is confiding. Iolande is sainted. Cold things are naive. All naive things are confiding. If something is bicolour then it is confiding. Cold, leguminous things are liege. Cold, leguminous things are sainted. All confiding, carbonylic things are leguminous. Iolande is carbonylic.", "logic": "\nNaive(bradley)\nConfiding(bradley)\nLiege(bradley)\nBicolour(virgil)\nSainted(virgil)\nCarbonylic(virgil)\nBicolour(kalila)\nSainted(kalila)\nConfiding(iolande)\nSainted(iolande)\nforall x (Bicolour(x) -> Naive(x))\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Confiding(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) -> Confiding(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and Leguminous(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and Leguminous(x) -> Sainted(x))\nforall x (Confiding(x) and Carbonylic(x) -> Leguminous(x))\n\nCarbonylic(iolande)\n\nCarbonylic(iolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Margeaux is triploid. Margeaux is attired. Margeaux is apogamic. Ettie is elaborate. Ettie is fungoid. Ettie is synonymous. Reinhold is elaborate. Reinhold is fungoid. Harrison is attired. Harrison is fungoid. Cold things are triploid. All triploid things are attired. If something is elaborate then it is attired. Cold, hispanic things are apogamic. Cold, hispanic things are fungoid. All attired, synonymous things are hispanic. Harrison is not elaborate.", "logic": "\nTriploid(margeaux)\nAttired(margeaux)\nApogamic(margeaux)\nElaborate(ettie)\nFungoid(ettie)\nSynonymous(ettie)\nElaborate(reinhold)\nFungoid(reinhold)\nAttired(harrison)\nFungoid(harrison)\nforall x (Elaborate(x) -> Triploid(x))\nforall x (Triploid(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Elaborate(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Elaborate(x) and Hispanic(x) -> Apogamic(x))\nforall x (Elaborate(x) and Hispanic(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nforall x (Attired(x) and Synonymous(x) -> Hispanic(x))\n\nnot Elaborate(harrison)\n\nnot Elaborate(harrison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Davie is midway. Davie is beakless. Davie is undatable. Annice is zeroth. Annice is protective. Annice is drained. Pepita is zeroth. Pepita is protective. Lolly is beakless. Lolly is protective. Cold things are midway. All midway things are beakless. If something is zeroth then it is beakless. Cold, half things are undatable. Cold, half things are protective. All beakless, drained things are half. Davie is zeroth.", "logic": "\nMidway(davie)\nBeakless(davie)\nUndatable(davie)\nZeroth(annice)\nProtective(annice)\nDrained(annice)\nZeroth(pepita)\nProtective(pepita)\nBeakless(lolly)\nProtective(lolly)\nforall x (Zeroth(x) -> Midway(x))\nforall x (Midway(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Zeroth(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Zeroth(x) and Half(x) -> Undatable(x))\nforall x (Zeroth(x) and Half(x) -> Protective(x))\nforall x (Beakless(x) and Drained(x) -> Half(x))\n\nZeroth(davie)\n\nZeroth(davie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-290"} {"premises": "Tabbi is unbacked. Tabbi is lovable. Tabbi is grandiose. Tabbi is glistering. Tabbi is shuttered. Tabbi is corroded. Tabbi is epenthetic. If someone is lovable then they are grandiose. If someone is shuttered then they are lovable. All glistering, unbacked people are lovable. Young, unbacked people are shuttered. Round, glistering people are lovable. If someone is corroded and shuttered then they are epenthetic. Tabbi is glistering.", "logic": "\nUnbacked(tabbi)\nLovable(tabbi)\nGrandiose(tabbi)\nGlistering(tabbi)\nShuttered(tabbi)\nCorroded(tabbi)\nEpenthetic(tabbi)\nforall x (Lovable(x) -> Grandiose(x))\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Glistering(x) and Unbacked(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Epenthetic(x) and Unbacked(x) -> Shuttered(x))\nforall x (Shuttered(x) and Glistering(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Corroded(x) and Shuttered(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\n\nGlistering(tabbi)\n\ntherefore Glistering(tabbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3882"} {"premises": "Len is analeptic. Len is boggy. Len is tibial. Len is hidden. Len is ruffianly. Len is unthought. Len is haywire. If someone is boggy then they are tibial. If someone is ruffianly then they are boggy. All hidden, analeptic people are boggy. Young, analeptic people are ruffianly. Round, hidden people are boggy. If someone is unthought and ruffianly then they are haywire. Len is not unthought.", "logic": "\nAnaleptic(len)\nBoggy(len)\nTibial(len)\nHidden(len)\nRuffianly(len)\nUnthought(len)\nHaywire(len)\nforall x (Boggy(x) -> Tibial(x))\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Hidden(x) and Analeptic(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Analeptic(x) -> Ruffianly(x))\nforall x (Ruffianly(x) and Hidden(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) and Ruffianly(x) -> Haywire(x))\n\nnot Unthought(len)\n\ntherefore Unthought(len)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3882"} {"premises": "The suzette is grizzled. The suzette is arachnoid. The suzette is selective. The suzette spotlight the arvie. The suzette humanize the sturgis. The suzette moisturise the arvie. The sturgis is arachnoid. The sturgis moisturise the suzette. The arvie is grizzled. The arvie is arachnoid. The arvie spotlight the sturgis. The arvie moisturise the suzette. If something spotlight the arvie then the arvie spotlight the suzette. If something humanize the suzette and it is agonistic then it spotlight the sturgis. If something spotlight the arvie and the arvie humanize the suzette then the suzette moisturise the sturgis. If something humanize the suzette and the suzette moisturise the arvie then the suzette spotlight the sturgis. If something moisturise the sturgis then the sturgis is insouciant. If something moisturise the suzette and the suzette spotlight the arvie then it humanize the suzette. The sturgis moisturise the suzette.", "logic": "\nGrizzled(suzette)\nArachnoid(suzette)\nSelective(suzette)\nSpotlight(suzette, arvie)\nHumanize(suzette, sturgis)\nMoisturise(suzette, arvie)\nArachnoid(sturgis)\nMoisturise(sturgis, suzette)\nGrizzled(arvie)\nArachnoid(arvie)\nSpotlight(arvie, sturgis)\nMoisturise(arvie, suzette)\nforall x (Spotlight(x, arvie) -> Spotlight(arvie, suzette))\nforall x (Humanize(x, suzette) and Agonistic(x) -> Spotlight(x, sturgis))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, arvie) and Humanize(arvie, suzette) -> Moisturise(suzette, sturgis))\nforall x (Humanize(x, suzette) and Moisturise(suzette, arvie) -> Spotlight(suzette, sturgis))\nforall x (Moisturise(x, sturgis) -> Insouciant(sturgis))\nforall x (Moisturise(x, suzette) and Spotlight(suzette, arvie) -> Humanize(x, suzette))\n\nMoisturise(sturgis, suzette)\n\ntherefore Moisturise(sturgis, suzette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The lindi is binuclear. The lindi is okay. The lindi is anemic. The lindi populate the elsa. The lindi jactitate the katie. The lindi breed the elsa. The katie is okay. The katie breed the lindi. The elsa is binuclear. The elsa is okay. The elsa populate the katie. The elsa breed the lindi. If something populate the elsa then the elsa populate the lindi. If something jactitate the lindi and it is unmarked then it populate the katie. If something populate the elsa and the elsa jactitate the lindi then the lindi breed the katie. If something jactitate the lindi and the lindi breed the elsa then the lindi populate the katie. If something breed the katie then the katie is combative. If something breed the lindi and the lindi populate the elsa then it jactitate the lindi. The lindi is not okay.", "logic": "\nBinuclear(lindi)\nOkay(lindi)\nAnemic(lindi)\nPopulate(lindi, elsa)\nJactitate(lindi, katie)\nBreed(lindi, elsa)\nOkay(katie)\nBreed(katie, lindi)\nBinuclear(elsa)\nOkay(elsa)\nPopulate(elsa, katie)\nBreed(elsa, lindi)\nforall x (Populate(x, elsa) -> Populate(elsa, lindi))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, lindi) and Unmarked(x) -> Populate(x, katie))\nforall x (Populate(x, elsa) and Jactitate(elsa, lindi) -> Breed(lindi, katie))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, lindi) and Breed(lindi, elsa) -> Populate(lindi, katie))\nforall x (Breed(x, katie) -> Combative(katie))\nforall x (Breed(x, lindi) and Populate(lindi, elsa) -> Jactitate(x, lindi))\n\nnot Okay(lindi)\n\ntherefore Okay(lindi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The gusta is adductive. The gusta is fatless. The gusta is liable. The gusta lyophilize the ulrike. The gusta brigade the berget. The gusta shoulder the ulrike. The berget is fatless. The berget shoulder the gusta. The ulrike is adductive. The ulrike is fatless. The ulrike lyophilize the berget. The ulrike shoulder the gusta. If something lyophilize the ulrike then the ulrike lyophilize the gusta. If something brigade the gusta and it is beguiled then it lyophilize the berget. If something lyophilize the ulrike and the ulrike brigade the gusta then the gusta shoulder the berget. If something brigade the gusta and the gusta shoulder the ulrike then the gusta lyophilize the berget. If something shoulder the berget then the berget is cognate. If something shoulder the gusta and the gusta lyophilize the ulrike then it brigade the gusta. The ulrike lyophilize the gusta.", "logic": "\nAdductive(gusta)\nFatless(gusta)\nLiable(gusta)\nLyophilize(gusta, ulrike)\nBrigade(gusta, berget)\nShoulder(gusta, ulrike)\nFatless(berget)\nShoulder(berget, gusta)\nAdductive(ulrike)\nFatless(ulrike)\nLyophilize(ulrike, berget)\nShoulder(ulrike, gusta)\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, ulrike) -> Lyophilize(ulrike, gusta))\nforall x (Brigade(x, gusta) and Beguiled(x) -> Lyophilize(x, berget))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, ulrike) and Brigade(ulrike, gusta) -> Shoulder(gusta, berget))\nforall x (Brigade(x, gusta) and Shoulder(gusta, ulrike) -> Lyophilize(gusta, berget))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, berget) -> Cognate(berget))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, gusta) and Lyophilize(gusta, ulrike) -> Brigade(x, gusta))\n\nLyophilize(ulrike, gusta)\n\nLyophilize(gusta, ulrike) and forall x (Lyophilize(x, ulrike) -> Lyophilize(ulrike, gusta)) -> therefore Lyophilize(ulrike, gusta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The trip is grasping. The trip is aleatory. The trip is stabilised. The trip power the hattie. The trip crow the lorilee. The trip funnel the hattie. The lorilee is aleatory. The lorilee funnel the trip. The hattie is grasping. The hattie is aleatory. The hattie power the lorilee. The hattie funnel the trip. If something power the hattie then the hattie power the trip. If something crow the trip and it is unripe then it power the lorilee. If something power the hattie and the hattie crow the trip then the trip funnel the lorilee. If something crow the trip and the trip funnel the hattie then the trip power the lorilee. If something funnel the lorilee then the lorilee is subaquatic. If something funnel the trip and the trip power the hattie then it crow the trip. The lorilee does not see the trip.", "logic": "\nGrasping(trip)\nAleatory(trip)\nStabilised(trip)\nPower(trip, hattie)\nCrow(trip, lorilee)\nFunnel(trip, hattie)\nAleatory(lorilee)\nFunnel(lorilee, trip)\nGrasping(hattie)\nAleatory(hattie)\nPower(hattie, lorilee)\nFunnel(hattie, trip)\nforall x (Power(x, hattie) -> Power(hattie, trip))\nforall x (Crow(x, trip) and Unripe(x) -> Power(x, lorilee))\nforall x (Power(x, hattie) and Crow(hattie, trip) -> Funnel(trip, lorilee))\nforall x (Crow(x, trip) and Funnel(trip, hattie) -> Power(trip, lorilee))\nforall x (Funnel(x, lorilee) -> Subaquatic(lorilee))\nforall x (Funnel(x, trip) and Power(trip, hattie) -> Crow(x, trip))\n\nnot Crow(lorilee, trip)\n\nFunnel(lorilee, trip) and Power(trip, hattie) and forall x (Funnel(x, trip) and Power(trip, hattie) -> Crow(x, trip)) -> therefore Crow(lorilee, trip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The debbra is pietistic. The debbra is privy. The debbra is albanian. The debbra solicit the dorris. The debbra invaginate the marieann. The debbra remodel the dorris. The marieann is privy. The marieann remodel the debbra. The dorris is pietistic. The dorris is privy. The dorris solicit the marieann. The dorris remodel the debbra. If something solicit the dorris then the dorris solicit the debbra. If something invaginate the debbra and it is entrancing then it solicit the marieann. If something solicit the dorris and the dorris invaginate the debbra then the debbra remodel the marieann. If something invaginate the debbra and the debbra remodel the dorris then the debbra solicit the marieann. If something remodel the marieann then the marieann is surmounted. If something remodel the debbra and the debbra solicit the dorris then it invaginate the debbra. The debbra solicit the marieann.", "logic": "\nPietistic(debbra)\nPrivy(debbra)\nAlbanian(debbra)\nSolicit(debbra, dorris)\nInvaginate(debbra, marieann)\nRemodel(debbra, dorris)\nPrivy(marieann)\nRemodel(marieann, debbra)\nPietistic(dorris)\nPrivy(dorris)\nSolicit(dorris, marieann)\nRemodel(dorris, debbra)\nforall x (Solicit(x, dorris) -> Solicit(dorris, debbra))\nforall x (Invaginate(x, debbra) and Entrancing(x) -> Solicit(x, marieann))\nforall x (Solicit(x, dorris) and Invaginate(dorris, debbra) -> Remodel(debbra, marieann))\nforall x (Invaginate(x, debbra) and Remodel(debbra, dorris) -> Solicit(debbra, marieann))\nforall x (Remodel(x, marieann) -> Surmounted(marieann))\nforall x (Remodel(x, debbra) and Solicit(debbra, dorris) -> Invaginate(x, debbra))\n\nSolicit(debbra, marieann)\n\nRemodel(dorris, debbra) and Solicit(debbra, dorris) and forall x (Remodel(x, debbra) and Solicit(debbra, dorris) -> Invaginate(x, debbra)) -> therefore Invaginate(dorris, debbra) Invaginate(dorris, debbra) and Remodel(debbra, dorris) and forall x (Invaginate(x, debbra) and Remodel(debbra, dorris) -> Solicit(debbra, marieann)) -> therefore Solicit(debbra, marieann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The giff is valent. The giff is virtual. The giff is collect. The giff brand the lorrin. The giff quest the becki. The giff downgrade the lorrin. The becki is virtual. The becki downgrade the giff. The lorrin is valent. The lorrin is virtual. The lorrin brand the becki. The lorrin downgrade the giff. If something brand the lorrin then the lorrin brand the giff. If something quest the giff and it is reconciled then it brand the becki. If something brand the lorrin and the lorrin quest the giff then the giff downgrade the becki. If something quest the giff and the giff downgrade the lorrin then the giff brand the becki. If something downgrade the becki then the becki is nonaligned. If something downgrade the giff and the giff brand the lorrin then it quest the giff. The giff does not need the becki.", "logic": "\nValent(giff)\nVirtual(giff)\nCollect(giff)\nBrand(giff, lorrin)\nQuest(giff, becki)\nDowngrade(giff, lorrin)\nVirtual(becki)\nDowngrade(becki, giff)\nValent(lorrin)\nVirtual(lorrin)\nBrand(lorrin, becki)\nDowngrade(lorrin, giff)\nforall x (Brand(x, lorrin) -> Brand(lorrin, giff))\nforall x (Quest(x, giff) and Reconciled(x) -> Brand(x, becki))\nforall x (Brand(x, lorrin) and Quest(lorrin, giff) -> Downgrade(giff, becki))\nforall x (Quest(x, giff) and Downgrade(giff, lorrin) -> Brand(giff, becki))\nforall x (Downgrade(x, becki) -> Nonaligned(becki))\nforall x (Downgrade(x, giff) and Brand(giff, lorrin) -> Quest(x, giff))\n\nnot Brand(giff, becki)\n\nDowngrade(lorrin, giff) and Brand(giff, lorrin) and forall x (Downgrade(x, giff) and Brand(giff, lorrin) -> Quest(x, giff)) -> therefore Quest(lorrin, giff) Quest(lorrin, giff) and Downgrade(giff, lorrin) and forall x (Quest(x, giff) and Downgrade(giff, lorrin) -> Brand(giff, becki)) -> therefore Brand(giff, becki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The carlos is untold. The carlos is tenebrous. The carlos is attenuate. The carlos coincide the elena. The carlos decompose the edie. The carlos unweave the elena. The edie is tenebrous. The edie unweave the carlos. The elena is untold. The elena is tenebrous. The elena coincide the edie. The elena unweave the carlos. If something coincide the elena then the elena coincide the carlos. If something decompose the carlos and it is flyspeck then it coincide the edie. If something coincide the elena and the elena decompose the carlos then the carlos unweave the edie. If something decompose the carlos and the carlos unweave the elena then the carlos coincide the edie. If something unweave the edie then the edie is stirring. If something unweave the carlos and the carlos coincide the elena then it decompose the carlos. The edie is stirring.", "logic": "\nUntold(carlos)\nTenebrous(carlos)\nAttenuate(carlos)\nCoincide(carlos, elena)\nDecompose(carlos, edie)\nUnweave(carlos, elena)\nTenebrous(edie)\nUnweave(edie, carlos)\nUntold(elena)\nTenebrous(elena)\nCoincide(elena, edie)\nUnweave(elena, carlos)\nforall x (Coincide(x, elena) -> Coincide(elena, carlos))\nforall x (Decompose(x, carlos) and Flyspeck(x) -> Coincide(x, edie))\nforall x (Coincide(x, elena) and Decompose(elena, carlos) -> Unweave(carlos, edie))\nforall x (Decompose(x, carlos) and Unweave(carlos, elena) -> Coincide(carlos, edie))\nforall x (Unweave(x, edie) -> Stirring(edie))\nforall x (Unweave(x, carlos) and Coincide(carlos, elena) -> Decompose(x, carlos))\n\nStirring(edie)\n\nUnweave(elena, carlos) and Coincide(carlos, elena) and forall x (Unweave(x, carlos) and Coincide(carlos, elena) -> Decompose(x, carlos)) -> therefore Decompose(elena, carlos) Coincide(carlos, elena) and Decompose(elena, carlos) and forall x (Coincide(x, elena) and Decompose(elena, carlos) -> Unweave(carlos, edie)) -> therefore Unweave(carlos, edie) Unweave(carlos, edie) and forall x (Unweave(x, edie) -> Stirring(edie)) -> therefore Stirring(edie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The mandy is appositive. The mandy is scurrying. The mandy is hotheaded. The mandy victimize the leoline. The mandy black the godart. The mandy sieve the leoline. The godart is scurrying. The godart sieve the mandy. The leoline is appositive. The leoline is scurrying. The leoline victimize the godart. The leoline sieve the mandy. If something victimize the leoline then the leoline victimize the mandy. If something black the mandy and it is prime then it victimize the godart. If something victimize the leoline and the leoline black the mandy then the mandy sieve the godart. If something black the mandy and the mandy sieve the leoline then the mandy victimize the godart. If something sieve the godart then the godart is gnarly. If something sieve the mandy and the mandy victimize the leoline then it black the mandy. The godart is not gnarly.", "logic": "\nAppositive(mandy)\nScurrying(mandy)\nHotheaded(mandy)\nVictimize(mandy, leoline)\nBlack(mandy, godart)\nSieve(mandy, leoline)\nScurrying(godart)\nSieve(godart, mandy)\nAppositive(leoline)\nScurrying(leoline)\nVictimize(leoline, godart)\nSieve(leoline, mandy)\nforall x (Victimize(x, leoline) -> Victimize(leoline, mandy))\nforall x (Black(x, mandy) and Prime(x) -> Victimize(x, godart))\nforall x (Victimize(x, leoline) and Black(leoline, mandy) -> Sieve(mandy, godart))\nforall x (Black(x, mandy) and Sieve(mandy, leoline) -> Victimize(mandy, godart))\nforall x (Sieve(x, godart) -> Gnarly(godart))\nforall x (Sieve(x, mandy) and Victimize(mandy, leoline) -> Black(x, mandy))\n\nnot Gnarly(godart)\n\nSieve(leoline, mandy) and Victimize(mandy, leoline) and forall x (Sieve(x, mandy) and Victimize(mandy, leoline) -> Black(x, mandy)) -> therefore Black(leoline, mandy) Victimize(mandy, leoline) and Black(leoline, mandy) and forall x (Victimize(x, leoline) and Black(leoline, mandy) -> Sieve(mandy, godart)) -> therefore Sieve(mandy, godart) Sieve(mandy, godart) and forall x (Sieve(x, godart) -> Gnarly(godart)) -> therefore Gnarly(godart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The tamra is sozzled. The tamra is canary. The tamra is shinto. The tamra inhibit the dasie. The tamra bash the alphonso. The tamra coggle the dasie. The alphonso is canary. The alphonso coggle the tamra. The dasie is sozzled. The dasie is canary. The dasie inhibit the alphonso. The dasie coggle the tamra. If something inhibit the dasie then the dasie inhibit the tamra. If something bash the tamra and it is unaffected then it inhibit the alphonso. If something inhibit the dasie and the dasie bash the tamra then the tamra coggle the alphonso. If something bash the tamra and the tamra coggle the dasie then the tamra inhibit the alphonso. If something coggle the alphonso then the alphonso is unmingled. If something coggle the tamra and the tamra inhibit the dasie then it bash the tamra. The alphonso does not need the alphonso.", "logic": "\nSozzled(tamra)\nCanary(tamra)\nShinto(tamra)\nInhibit(tamra, dasie)\nBash(tamra, alphonso)\nCoggle(tamra, dasie)\nCanary(alphonso)\nCoggle(alphonso, tamra)\nSozzled(dasie)\nCanary(dasie)\nInhibit(dasie, alphonso)\nCoggle(dasie, tamra)\nforall x (Inhibit(x, dasie) -> Inhibit(dasie, tamra))\nforall x (Bash(x, tamra) and Unaffected(x) -> Inhibit(x, alphonso))\nforall x (Inhibit(x, dasie) and Bash(dasie, tamra) -> Coggle(tamra, alphonso))\nforall x (Bash(x, tamra) and Coggle(tamra, dasie) -> Inhibit(tamra, alphonso))\nforall x (Coggle(x, alphonso) -> Unmingled(alphonso))\nforall x (Coggle(x, tamra) and Inhibit(tamra, dasie) -> Bash(x, tamra))\n\nnot Inhibit(alphonso, alphonso)\n\nforall x (Bash(x, tamra) and Unaffected(x) -> Inhibit(x, alphonso)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The caril is spry. The caril is vasomotor. The caril is vesical. The caril edify the katerina. The caril blaspheme the tad. The caril archaize the katerina. The tad is vasomotor. The tad archaize the caril. The katerina is spry. The katerina is vasomotor. The katerina edify the tad. The katerina archaize the caril. If something edify the katerina then the katerina edify the caril. If something blaspheme the caril and it is alular then it edify the tad. If something edify the katerina and the katerina blaspheme the caril then the caril archaize the tad. If something blaspheme the caril and the caril archaize the katerina then the caril edify the tad. If something archaize the tad then the tad is hertzian. If something archaize the caril and the caril edify the katerina then it blaspheme the caril. The caril blaspheme the caril.", "logic": "\nSpry(caril)\nVasomotor(caril)\nVesical(caril)\nEdify(caril, katerina)\nBlaspheme(caril, tad)\nArchaize(caril, katerina)\nVasomotor(tad)\nArchaize(tad, caril)\nSpry(katerina)\nVasomotor(katerina)\nEdify(katerina, tad)\nArchaize(katerina, caril)\nforall x (Edify(x, katerina) -> Edify(katerina, caril))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, caril) and Alular(x) -> Edify(x, tad))\nforall x (Edify(x, katerina) and Blaspheme(katerina, caril) -> Archaize(caril, tad))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, caril) and Archaize(caril, katerina) -> Edify(caril, tad))\nforall x (Archaize(x, tad) -> Hertzian(tad))\nforall x (Archaize(x, caril) and Edify(caril, katerina) -> Blaspheme(x, caril))\n\nBlaspheme(caril, caril)\n\nforall x (Archaize(x, caril) and Edify(caril, katerina) -> Blaspheme(x, caril)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The tyson is evergreen. The tyson is obdurate. The tyson is patient. The tyson title the sybilla. The tyson resent the imojean. The tyson glamorise the sybilla. The imojean is obdurate. The imojean glamorise the tyson. The sybilla is evergreen. The sybilla is obdurate. The sybilla title the imojean. The sybilla glamorise the tyson. If something title the sybilla then the sybilla title the tyson. If something resent the tyson and it is libellous then it title the imojean. If something title the sybilla and the sybilla resent the tyson then the tyson glamorise the imojean. If something resent the tyson and the tyson glamorise the sybilla then the tyson title the imojean. If something glamorise the imojean then the imojean is domed. If something glamorise the tyson and the tyson title the sybilla then it resent the tyson. The sybilla is not domed.", "logic": "\nEvergreen(tyson)\nObdurate(tyson)\nPatient(tyson)\nTitle(tyson, sybilla)\nResent(tyson, imojean)\nGlamorise(tyson, sybilla)\nObdurate(imojean)\nGlamorise(imojean, tyson)\nEvergreen(sybilla)\nObdurate(sybilla)\nTitle(sybilla, imojean)\nGlamorise(sybilla, tyson)\nforall x (Title(x, sybilla) -> Title(sybilla, tyson))\nforall x (Resent(x, tyson) and Libellous(x) -> Title(x, imojean))\nforall x (Title(x, sybilla) and Resent(sybilla, tyson) -> Glamorise(tyson, imojean))\nforall x (Resent(x, tyson) and Glamorise(tyson, sybilla) -> Title(tyson, imojean))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, imojean) -> Domed(imojean))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, tyson) and Title(tyson, sybilla) -> Resent(x, tyson))\n\nnot Domed(sybilla)\n\nnot Domed(sybilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The morlee is oceangoing. The morlee is vendible. The morlee is billion. The morlee muffle the charla. The morlee samba the plato. The morlee coquette the charla. The plato is vendible. The plato coquette the morlee. The charla is oceangoing. The charla is vendible. The charla muffle the plato. The charla coquette the morlee. If something muffle the charla then the charla muffle the morlee. If something samba the morlee and it is closed then it muffle the plato. If something muffle the charla and the charla samba the morlee then the morlee coquette the plato. If something samba the morlee and the morlee coquette the charla then the morlee muffle the plato. If something coquette the plato then the plato is incautious. If something coquette the morlee and the morlee muffle the charla then it samba the morlee. The plato samba the charla.", "logic": "\nOceangoing(morlee)\nVendible(morlee)\nBillion(morlee)\nMuffle(morlee, charla)\nSamba(morlee, plato)\nCoquette(morlee, charla)\nVendible(plato)\nCoquette(plato, morlee)\nOceangoing(charla)\nVendible(charla)\nMuffle(charla, plato)\nCoquette(charla, morlee)\nforall x (Muffle(x, charla) -> Muffle(charla, morlee))\nforall x (Samba(x, morlee) and Closed(x) -> Muffle(x, plato))\nforall x (Muffle(x, charla) and Samba(charla, morlee) -> Coquette(morlee, plato))\nforall x (Samba(x, morlee) and Coquette(morlee, charla) -> Muffle(morlee, plato))\nforall x (Coquette(x, plato) -> Incautious(plato))\nforall x (Coquette(x, morlee) and Muffle(morlee, charla) -> Samba(x, morlee))\n\nSamba(plato, charla)\n\nSamba(plato, charla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The collins is lymphoid. The collins is purposeful. The collins is carnassial. The collins depreciate the bellanca. The collins tarnish the zachariah. The collins blackberry the bellanca. The zachariah is purposeful. The zachariah blackberry the collins. The bellanca is lymphoid. The bellanca is purposeful. The bellanca depreciate the zachariah. The bellanca blackberry the collins. If something depreciate the bellanca then the bellanca depreciate the collins. If something tarnish the collins and it is dummy then it depreciate the zachariah. If something depreciate the bellanca and the bellanca tarnish the collins then the collins blackberry the zachariah. If something tarnish the collins and the collins blackberry the bellanca then the collins depreciate the zachariah. If something blackberry the zachariah then the zachariah is meagerly. If something blackberry the collins and the collins depreciate the bellanca then it tarnish the collins. The bellanca does not see the zachariah.", "logic": "\nLymphoid(collins)\nPurposeful(collins)\nCarnassial(collins)\nDepreciate(collins, bellanca)\nTarnish(collins, zachariah)\nBlackberry(collins, bellanca)\nPurposeful(zachariah)\nBlackberry(zachariah, collins)\nLymphoid(bellanca)\nPurposeful(bellanca)\nDepreciate(bellanca, zachariah)\nBlackberry(bellanca, collins)\nforall x (Depreciate(x, bellanca) -> Depreciate(bellanca, collins))\nforall x (Tarnish(x, collins) and Dummy(x) -> Depreciate(x, zachariah))\nforall x (Depreciate(x, bellanca) and Tarnish(bellanca, collins) -> Blackberry(collins, zachariah))\nforall x (Tarnish(x, collins) and Blackberry(collins, bellanca) -> Depreciate(collins, zachariah))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, zachariah) -> Meagerly(zachariah))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, collins) and Depreciate(collins, bellanca) -> Tarnish(x, collins))\n\nnot Tarnish(bellanca, zachariah)\n\nnot Tarnish(bellanca, zachariah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The gwenn is parve. The gwenn is uveal. The gwenn is undesirous. The gwenn loathe the allissa. The gwenn invalidate the stephi. The gwenn capsule the allissa. The stephi is uveal. The stephi capsule the gwenn. The allissa is parve. The allissa is uveal. The allissa loathe the stephi. The allissa capsule the gwenn. If something loathe the allissa then the allissa loathe the gwenn. If something invalidate the gwenn and it is lurid then it loathe the stephi. If something loathe the allissa and the allissa invalidate the gwenn then the gwenn capsule the stephi. If something invalidate the gwenn and the gwenn capsule the allissa then the gwenn loathe the stephi. If something capsule the stephi then the stephi is soporific. If something capsule the gwenn and the gwenn loathe the allissa then it invalidate the gwenn. The gwenn is soporific.", "logic": "\nParve(gwenn)\nUveal(gwenn)\nUndesirous(gwenn)\nLoathe(gwenn, allissa)\nInvalidate(gwenn, stephi)\nCapsule(gwenn, allissa)\nUveal(stephi)\nCapsule(stephi, gwenn)\nParve(allissa)\nUveal(allissa)\nLoathe(allissa, stephi)\nCapsule(allissa, gwenn)\nforall x (Loathe(x, allissa) -> Loathe(allissa, gwenn))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, gwenn) and Lurid(x) -> Loathe(x, stephi))\nforall x (Loathe(x, allissa) and Invalidate(allissa, gwenn) -> Capsule(gwenn, stephi))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, gwenn) and Capsule(gwenn, allissa) -> Loathe(gwenn, stephi))\nforall x (Capsule(x, stephi) -> Soporific(stephi))\nforall x (Capsule(x, gwenn) and Loathe(gwenn, allissa) -> Invalidate(x, gwenn))\n\nSoporific(gwenn)\n\nSoporific(gwenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The petey is every. The petey is unflavored. The petey is overhasty. The petey ordinate the orel. The petey outlaw the gaylene. The petey suppress the orel. The gaylene is unflavored. The gaylene suppress the petey. The orel is every. The orel is unflavored. The orel ordinate the gaylene. The orel suppress the petey. If something ordinate the orel then the orel ordinate the petey. If something outlaw the petey and it is romance then it ordinate the gaylene. If something ordinate the orel and the orel outlaw the petey then the petey suppress the gaylene. If something outlaw the petey and the petey suppress the orel then the petey ordinate the gaylene. If something suppress the gaylene then the gaylene is topping. If something suppress the petey and the petey ordinate the orel then it outlaw the petey. The gaylene does not need the petey.", "logic": "\nEvery(petey)\nUnflavored(petey)\nOverhasty(petey)\nOrdinate(petey, orel)\nOutlaw(petey, gaylene)\nSuppress(petey, orel)\nUnflavored(gaylene)\nSuppress(gaylene, petey)\nEvery(orel)\nUnflavored(orel)\nOrdinate(orel, gaylene)\nSuppress(orel, petey)\nforall x (Ordinate(x, orel) -> Ordinate(orel, petey))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, petey) and Romance(x) -> Ordinate(x, gaylene))\nforall x (Ordinate(x, orel) and Outlaw(orel, petey) -> Suppress(petey, gaylene))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, petey) and Suppress(petey, orel) -> Ordinate(petey, gaylene))\nforall x (Suppress(x, gaylene) -> Topping(gaylene))\nforall x (Suppress(x, petey) and Ordinate(petey, orel) -> Outlaw(x, petey))\n\nnot Ordinate(gaylene, petey)\n\nnot Ordinate(gaylene, petey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "The guglielma is directive. The guglielma is zolaesque. The guglielma is rackety. The guglielma dado the madona. The guglielma object the sutton. The guglielma revile the madona. The sutton is zolaesque. The sutton revile the guglielma. The madona is directive. The madona is zolaesque. The madona dado the sutton. The madona revile the guglielma. If something dado the madona then the madona dado the guglielma. If something object the guglielma and it is worshipped then it dado the sutton. If something dado the madona and the madona object the guglielma then the guglielma revile the sutton. If something object the guglielma and the guglielma revile the madona then the guglielma dado the sutton. If something revile the sutton then the sutton is intestinal. If something revile the guglielma and the guglielma dado the madona then it object the guglielma. The madona is worshipped.", "logic": "\nDirective(guglielma)\nZolaesque(guglielma)\nRackety(guglielma)\nDado(guglielma, madona)\nObject(guglielma, sutton)\nRevile(guglielma, madona)\nZolaesque(sutton)\nRevile(sutton, guglielma)\nDirective(madona)\nZolaesque(madona)\nDado(madona, sutton)\nRevile(madona, guglielma)\nforall x (Dado(x, madona) -> Dado(madona, guglielma))\nforall x (Object(x, guglielma) and Worshipped(x) -> Dado(x, sutton))\nforall x (Dado(x, madona) and Object(madona, guglielma) -> Revile(guglielma, sutton))\nforall x (Object(x, guglielma) and Revile(guglielma, madona) -> Dado(guglielma, sutton))\nforall x (Revile(x, sutton) -> Intestinal(sutton))\nforall x (Revile(x, guglielma) and Dado(guglielma, madona) -> Object(x, guglielma))\n\nWorshipped(madona)\n\nWorshipped(madona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-539"} {"premises": "Vasily is cranky. Vasily is divinatory. Vasily is stifling. Vasily is similar. Vasily is foursquare. Vasily is obscure. Fidelia is unbeknown. Zeus is divinatory. Zeus is unbeknown. Sofie is similar. Cold, cranky things are obscure. If something is obscure and unbeknown then it is similar. All stifling things are divinatory. If something is similar and cranky then it is unbeknown. All similar things are foursquare. If something is divinatory then it is stifling. Blue, unbeknown things are foursquare. Young things are foursquare. Vasily is obscure.", "logic": "\nCranky(vasily)\nDivinatory(vasily)\nStifling(vasily)\nSimilar(vasily)\nFoursquare(vasily)\nObscure(vasily)\nUnbeknown(fidelia)\nDivinatory(zeus)\nUnbeknown(zeus)\nSimilar(sofie)\nforall x (Stifling(x) and Cranky(x) -> Obscure(x))\nforall x (Obscure(x) and Unbeknown(x) -> Similar(x))\nforall x (Stifling(x) -> Divinatory(x))\nforall x (Similar(x) and Cranky(x) -> Unbeknown(x))\nforall x (Similar(x) -> Foursquare(x))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) -> Stifling(x))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) and Unbeknown(x) -> Foursquare(x))\nforall x (Obscure(x) -> Foursquare(x))\n\nObscure(vasily)\n\ntherefore Obscure(vasily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3908"} {"premises": "Garcia is refractile. Garcia is tenured. Garcia is palladian. Garcia is abasic. Garcia is frosty. Garcia is endless. Sheela is small. Lindie is tenured. Lindie is small. Janeva is abasic. Cold, refractile things are endless. If something is endless and small then it is abasic. All palladian things are tenured. If something is abasic and refractile then it is small. All abasic things are frosty. If something is tenured then it is palladian. Blue, small things are frosty. Young things are frosty. Garcia is not abasic.", "logic": "\nRefractile(garcia)\nTenured(garcia)\nPalladian(garcia)\nAbasic(garcia)\nFrosty(garcia)\nEndless(garcia)\nSmall(sheela)\nTenured(lindie)\nSmall(lindie)\nAbasic(janeva)\nforall x (Palladian(x) and Refractile(x) -> Endless(x))\nforall x (Endless(x) and Small(x) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Tenured(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) and Refractile(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Abasic(x) -> Frosty(x))\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Palladian(x))\nforall x (Tenured(x) and Small(x) -> Frosty(x))\nforall x (Endless(x) -> Frosty(x))\n\nnot Abasic(garcia)\n\ntherefore Abasic(garcia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3908"} {"premises": "Walsh is vitrified. Walsh is prostyle. Walsh is optative. Walsh is sudorific. Walsh is tolerant. Walsh is convergent. Nevin is antiphonal. Theresa is prostyle. Theresa is antiphonal. Husein is sudorific. Cold, vitrified things are convergent. If something is convergent and antiphonal then it is sudorific. All optative things are prostyle. If something is sudorific and vitrified then it is antiphonal. All sudorific things are tolerant. If something is prostyle then it is optative. Blue, antiphonal things are tolerant. Young things are tolerant. Nevin is not prostyle.", "logic": "\nVitrified(walsh)\nProstyle(walsh)\nOptative(walsh)\nSudorific(walsh)\nTolerant(walsh)\nConvergent(walsh)\nAntiphonal(nevin)\nProstyle(theresa)\nAntiphonal(theresa)\nSudorific(husein)\nforall x (Optative(x) and Vitrified(x) -> Convergent(x))\nforall x (Convergent(x) and Antiphonal(x) -> Sudorific(x))\nforall x (Optative(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nforall x (Sudorific(x) and Vitrified(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\nforall x (Sudorific(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Prostyle(x) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Prostyle(x) and Antiphonal(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Convergent(x) -> Tolerant(x))\n\nnot Prostyle(nevin)\n\nforall x (Optative(x) -> Prostyle(x)) <- forall x (Prostyle(x) -> Optative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3908"} {"premises": "Annamari is leftmost. Annamari is echt. Annamari is cowled. Annamari is extradural. Annamari is prototypic. Annamari is avaricious. Selena is irish. Derk is echt. Derk is irish. Amaleta is extradural. Cold, leftmost things are avaricious. If something is avaricious and irish then it is extradural. All cowled things are echt. If something is extradural and leftmost then it is irish. All extradural things are prototypic. If something is echt then it is cowled. Blue, irish things are prototypic. Young things are prototypic. Derk is leftmost.", "logic": "\nLeftmost(annamari)\nEcht(annamari)\nCowled(annamari)\nExtradural(annamari)\nPrototypic(annamari)\nAvaricious(annamari)\nIrish(selena)\nEcht(derk)\nIrish(derk)\nExtradural(amaleta)\nforall x (Cowled(x) and Leftmost(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) and Irish(x) -> Extradural(x))\nforall x (Cowled(x) -> Echt(x))\nforall x (Extradural(x) and Leftmost(x) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Extradural(x) -> Prototypic(x))\nforall x (Echt(x) -> Cowled(x))\nforall x (Echt(x) and Irish(x) -> Prototypic(x))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Prototypic(x))\n\nLeftmost(derk)\n\nLeftmost(derk) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3908"} {"premises": "Gustave is fernless. Gustave is cauline. Gustave is tangy. Gustave is teenage. Gustave is endodontic. Gustave is dyadic. Gustave is useless. Young, endodontic things are teenage. All teenage, fernless things are tangy. Gustave is endodontic.", "logic": "\nFernless(gustave)\nCauline(gustave)\nTangy(gustave)\nTeenage(gustave)\nEndodontic(gustave)\nDyadic(gustave)\nUseless(gustave)\nforall x (Useless(x) and Endodontic(x) -> Teenage(x))\nforall x (Teenage(x) and Fernless(x) -> Tangy(x))\n\nEndodontic(gustave)\n\ntherefore Endodontic(gustave)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2608"} {"premises": "Joelynn is clumsy. Joelynn is bionomic. Joelynn is inbound. Joelynn is only. Joelynn is pyramidic. Joelynn is factious. Joelynn is iridic. Young, pyramidic things are only. All only, clumsy things are inbound. Joelynn is not pyramidic.", "logic": "\nClumsy(joelynn)\nBionomic(joelynn)\nInbound(joelynn)\nOnly(joelynn)\nPyramidic(joelynn)\nFactious(joelynn)\nIridic(joelynn)\nforall x (Iridic(x) and Pyramidic(x) -> Only(x))\nforall x (Only(x) and Clumsy(x) -> Inbound(x))\n\nnot Pyramidic(joelynn)\n\ntherefore Pyramidic(joelynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2608"} {"premises": "Lauree is unsexed. Tamra is wormlike. All smelling people are knackered. Round people are smelling. Lauree is unsexed.", "logic": "\nUnsexed(lauree)\nWormlike(tamra)\nforall x (Smelling(x) -> Knackered(x))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) -> Smelling(x))\n\nUnsexed(lauree)\n\ntherefore Unsexed(lauree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Graham is rotated. Steffen is unromantic. All moroccan people are adolescent. Round people are moroccan. Steffen is not unromantic.", "logic": "\nRotated(graham)\nUnromantic(steffen)\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Moroccan(x))\n\nnot Unromantic(steffen)\n\ntherefore Unromantic(steffen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Rebeka is flaxen. Lizzy is credible. All accusing people are inaugural. Round people are accusing. Lizzy is accusing.", "logic": "\nFlaxen(rebeka)\nCredible(lizzy)\nforall x (Accusing(x) -> Inaugural(x))\nforall x (Credible(x) -> Accusing(x))\n\nAccusing(lizzy)\n\nCredible(lizzy) and forall x (Credible(x) -> Accusing(x)) -> therefore Accusing(lizzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Emma is infirm. Hollyanne is arbitral. All rimless people are naturistic. Round people are rimless. Hollyanne is not rimless.", "logic": "\nInfirm(emma)\nArbitral(hollyanne)\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) -> Rimless(x))\n\nnot Rimless(hollyanne)\n\nArbitral(hollyanne) and forall x (Arbitral(x) -> Rimless(x)) -> therefore Rimless(hollyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Sidney is smug. June is optical. All beneficial people are cervine. Round people are beneficial. June is cervine.", "logic": "\nSmug(sidney)\nOptical(june)\nforall x (Beneficial(x) -> Cervine(x))\nforall x (Optical(x) -> Beneficial(x))\n\nCervine(june)\n\nOptical(june) and forall x (Optical(x) -> Beneficial(x)) -> therefore Beneficial(june) Beneficial(june) and forall x (Beneficial(x) -> Cervine(x)) -> therefore Cervine(june)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Teodora is comfy. Jerrold is deathless. All advisory people are crumbly. Round people are advisory. Jerrold is not crumbly.", "logic": "\nComfy(teodora)\nDeathless(jerrold)\nforall x (Advisory(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Advisory(x))\n\nnot Crumbly(jerrold)\n\nDeathless(jerrold) and forall x (Deathless(x) -> Advisory(x)) -> therefore Advisory(jerrold) Advisory(jerrold) and forall x (Advisory(x) -> Crumbly(x)) -> therefore Crumbly(jerrold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Eddy is corbelled. Stafford is peeled. All aquiferous people are empiric. Round people are aquiferous. Eddy is not empiric.", "logic": "\nCorbelled(eddy)\nPeeled(stafford)\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Empiric(x))\nforall x (Peeled(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\n\nnot Empiric(eddy)\n\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Empiric(x)) <- forall x (Peeled(x) -> Aquiferous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Ines is lactogenic. Gasper is epizootic. All hygienic people are wanton. Round people are hygienic. Ines is hygienic.", "logic": "\nLactogenic(ines)\nEpizootic(gasper)\nforall x (Hygienic(x) -> Wanton(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Hygienic(x))\n\nHygienic(ines)\n\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Hygienic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Zachariah is olfactory. Reeta is drab. All contingent people are neapolitan. Round people are contingent. Reeta is not white.", "logic": "\nOlfactory(zachariah)\nDrab(reeta)\nforall x (Contingent(x) -> Neapolitan(x))\nforall x (Drab(x) -> Contingent(x))\n\nnot White(reeta)\n\nnot White(reeta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Hertha is endemic. Elric is fogyish. All melted people are rhombic. Round people are melted. Elric is endemic.", "logic": "\nEndemic(hertha)\nFogyish(elric)\nforall x (Melted(x) -> Rhombic(x))\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> Melted(x))\n\nEndemic(elric)\n\nEndemic(elric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Timmie is repentant. Pauly is octuple. All defending people are puritanic. Round people are defending. Timmie is not white.", "logic": "\nRepentant(timmie)\nOctuple(pauly)\nforall x (Defending(x) -> Puritanic(x))\nforall x (Octuple(x) -> Defending(x))\n\nnot White(timmie)\n\nnot White(timmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Allys is thunderous. Karna is insanitary. All damask people are fair. Round people are damask. Allys is insanitary.", "logic": "\nThunderous(allys)\nInsanitary(karna)\nforall x (Damask(x) -> Fair(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Damask(x))\n\nInsanitary(allys)\n\nInsanitary(allys) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1461"} {"premises": "Antony is satiated. Antony is configured. Antony is organismal. Antony is articular. Antony is stinking. Antony is renal. Ephram is satiated. Ephram is unrewarded. Ephram is configured. Ephram is not organismal. Ephram is stinking. Ephram is renal. All renal, organismal things are stinking. Ephram is not organismal.", "logic": "\nSatiated(antony)\nConfigured(antony)\nOrganismal(antony)\nArticular(antony)\nStinking(antony)\nRenal(antony)\nSatiated(ephram)\nUnrewarded(ephram)\nConfigured(ephram)\nnot Organismal(ephram)\nStinking(ephram)\nRenal(ephram)\nforall x (Renal(x) and Organismal(x) -> Stinking(x))\n\nnot Organismal(ephram)\n\ntherefore not Organismal(ephram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2299"} {"premises": "Dorelle is bacillary. Dorelle is unshared. Dorelle is tobagonian. Dorelle is small. Dorelle is windup. Dorelle is bearish. Jonah is bacillary. Jonah is lissom. Jonah is unshared. Jonah is not tobagonian. Jonah is windup. Jonah is bearish. All bearish, tobagonian things are windup. Dorelle is not small.", "logic": "\nBacillary(dorelle)\nUnshared(dorelle)\nTobagonian(dorelle)\nSmall(dorelle)\nWindup(dorelle)\nBearish(dorelle)\nBacillary(jonah)\nLissom(jonah)\nUnshared(jonah)\nnot Tobagonian(jonah)\nWindup(jonah)\nBearish(jonah)\nforall x (Bearish(x) and Tobagonian(x) -> Windup(x))\n\nnot Small(dorelle)\n\ntherefore Small(dorelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2299"} {"premises": "Koren is nautical. Koren is hebridean. Koren is scraggly. Koren is clubbable. Koren is trashy. Koren is burred. Emilie is nautical. Emilie is sixteenth. Emilie is hebridean. Emilie is not scraggly. Emilie is trashy. Emilie is burred. All burred, scraggly things are trashy. Koren is not sixteenth.", "logic": "\nNautical(koren)\nHebridean(koren)\nScraggly(koren)\nClubbable(koren)\nTrashy(koren)\nBurred(koren)\nNautical(emilie)\nSixteenth(emilie)\nHebridean(emilie)\nnot Scraggly(emilie)\nTrashy(emilie)\nBurred(emilie)\nforall x (Burred(x) and Scraggly(x) -> Trashy(x))\n\nnot Sixteenth(koren)\n\nnot Sixteenth(koren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2299"} {"premises": "Herold is blotchy. Herold is dwindling. Herold is shoreward. Herold is arthritic. Herold is romish. Herold is bunglesome. Zola is blotchy. Zola is vulval. Zola is dwindling. Zola is not shoreward. Zola is romish. Zola is bunglesome. All bunglesome, shoreward things are romish. Zola is arthritic.", "logic": "\nBlotchy(herold)\nDwindling(herold)\nShoreward(herold)\nArthritic(herold)\nRomish(herold)\nBunglesome(herold)\nBlotchy(zola)\nVulval(zola)\nDwindling(zola)\nnot Shoreward(zola)\nRomish(zola)\nBunglesome(zola)\nforall x (Bunglesome(x) and Shoreward(x) -> Romish(x))\n\nArthritic(zola)\n\nArthritic(zola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2299"} {"premises": "The nikkie weld the casi. The nikkie pluralise the casi. The casi weld the nikkie. If something weld the casi then it is collect. If something is collect then it pluralise the nikkie. If something pluralise the nikkie and the nikkie does not chase the casi then it does not chase the nikkie. If something weld the nikkie then it does not visit the casi. If something pluralise the nikkie and the nikkie weld the casi then the casi pluralise the nikkie. If something weld the nikkie and the nikkie weld the casi then it does not visit the nikkie. If something weld the nikkie and the nikkie does not visit the casi then the nikkie is not unlobed. If the nikkie does not see the casi and the casi does not chase the nikkie then the nikkie is columnar. The casi weld the nikkie.", "logic": "\nWeld(nikkie, casi)\nPluralise(nikkie, casi)\nWeld(casi, nikkie)\nforall x (Weld(x, casi) -> Collect(x))\nforall x (Collect(x) -> Pluralise(x, nikkie))\nforall x (Pluralise(x, nikkie) and not Weld(nikkie, casi) -> not Weld(x, nikkie))\nforall x (Weld(x, nikkie) -> not Dupe(x, casi))\nforall x (Pluralise(x, nikkie) and Weld(nikkie, casi) -> Pluralise(casi, nikkie))\nforall x (Weld(x, nikkie) and Weld(nikkie, casi) -> not Dupe(x, nikkie))\nforall x (Weld(x, nikkie) and not Dupe(nikkie, casi) -> not Unlobed(nikkie))\nnot Pluralise(nikkie, casi) and not Weld(casi, nikkie) -> Columnar(nikkie)\n\nWeld(casi, nikkie)\n\ntherefore Weld(casi, nikkie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The garv swoon the gearard. The garv knight the gearard. The gearard swoon the garv. If something swoon the gearard then it is knotted. If something is knotted then it knight the garv. If something knight the garv and the garv does not chase the gearard then it does not chase the garv. If something swoon the garv then it does not visit the gearard. If something knight the garv and the garv swoon the gearard then the gearard knight the garv. If something swoon the garv and the garv swoon the gearard then it does not visit the garv. If something swoon the garv and the garv does not visit the gearard then the garv is not leggy. If the garv does not see the gearard and the gearard does not chase the garv then the garv is cushioned. The garv does not see the gearard.", "logic": "\nSwoon(garv, gearard)\nKnight(garv, gearard)\nSwoon(gearard, garv)\nforall x (Swoon(x, gearard) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Knotted(x) -> Knight(x, garv))\nforall x (Knight(x, garv) and not Swoon(garv, gearard) -> not Swoon(x, garv))\nforall x (Swoon(x, garv) -> not Petrify(x, gearard))\nforall x (Knight(x, garv) and Swoon(garv, gearard) -> Knight(gearard, garv))\nforall x (Swoon(x, garv) and Swoon(garv, gearard) -> not Petrify(x, garv))\nforall x (Swoon(x, garv) and not Petrify(garv, gearard) -> not Leggy(garv))\nnot Knight(garv, gearard) and not Swoon(gearard, garv) -> Cushioned(garv)\n\nnot Knight(garv, gearard)\n\ntherefore Knight(garv, gearard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The margret centralise the brigid. The margret counteract the brigid. The brigid centralise the margret. If something centralise the brigid then it is cabalistic. If something is cabalistic then it counteract the margret. If something counteract the margret and the margret does not chase the brigid then it does not chase the margret. If something centralise the margret then it does not visit the brigid. If something counteract the margret and the margret centralise the brigid then the brigid counteract the margret. If something centralise the margret and the margret centralise the brigid then it does not visit the margret. If something centralise the margret and the margret does not visit the brigid then the margret is not walloping. If the margret does not see the brigid and the brigid does not chase the margret then the margret is areal. The brigid does not visit the brigid.", "logic": "\nCentralise(margret, brigid)\nCounteract(margret, brigid)\nCentralise(brigid, margret)\nforall x (Centralise(x, brigid) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) -> Counteract(x, margret))\nforall x (Counteract(x, margret) and not Centralise(margret, brigid) -> not Centralise(x, margret))\nforall x (Centralise(x, margret) -> not Dish(x, brigid))\nforall x (Counteract(x, margret) and Centralise(margret, brigid) -> Counteract(brigid, margret))\nforall x (Centralise(x, margret) and Centralise(margret, brigid) -> not Dish(x, margret))\nforall x (Centralise(x, margret) and not Dish(margret, brigid) -> not Walloping(margret))\nnot Counteract(margret, brigid) and not Centralise(brigid, margret) -> Areal(margret)\n\nnot Dish(brigid, brigid)\n\nCentralise(brigid, margret) and forall x (Centralise(x, margret) -> not Dish(x, brigid)) -> therefore not Dish(brigid, brigid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The elke rarify the fredrick. The elke still the fredrick. The fredrick rarify the elke. If something rarify the fredrick then it is tethered. If something is tethered then it still the elke. If something still the elke and the elke does not chase the fredrick then it does not chase the elke. If something rarify the elke then it does not visit the fredrick. If something still the elke and the elke rarify the fredrick then the fredrick still the elke. If something rarify the elke and the elke rarify the fredrick then it does not visit the elke. If something rarify the elke and the elke does not visit the fredrick then the elke is not pondering. If the elke does not see the fredrick and the fredrick does not chase the elke then the elke is actuated. The elke is not tethered.", "logic": "\nRarify(elke, fredrick)\nStill(elke, fredrick)\nRarify(fredrick, elke)\nforall x (Rarify(x, fredrick) -> Tethered(x))\nforall x (Tethered(x) -> Still(x, elke))\nforall x (Still(x, elke) and not Rarify(elke, fredrick) -> not Rarify(x, elke))\nforall x (Rarify(x, elke) -> not Goffer(x, fredrick))\nforall x (Still(x, elke) and Rarify(elke, fredrick) -> Still(fredrick, elke))\nforall x (Rarify(x, elke) and Rarify(elke, fredrick) -> not Goffer(x, elke))\nforall x (Rarify(x, elke) and not Goffer(elke, fredrick) -> not Pondering(elke))\nnot Still(elke, fredrick) and not Rarify(fredrick, elke) -> Actuated(elke)\n\nnot Tethered(elke)\n\nRarify(elke, fredrick) and forall x (Rarify(x, fredrick) -> Tethered(x)) -> therefore Tethered(elke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The tully think the sarena. The tully miter the sarena. The sarena think the tully. If something think the sarena then it is thenar. If something is thenar then it miter the tully. If something miter the tully and the tully does not chase the sarena then it does not chase the tully. If something think the tully then it does not visit the sarena. If something miter the tully and the tully think the sarena then the sarena miter the tully. If something think the tully and the tully think the sarena then it does not visit the tully. If something think the tully and the tully does not visit the sarena then the tully is not parturient. If the tully does not see the sarena and the sarena does not chase the tully then the tully is earliest. The tully miter the tully.", "logic": "\nThink(tully, sarena)\nMiter(tully, sarena)\nThink(sarena, tully)\nforall x (Think(x, sarena) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Miter(x, tully))\nforall x (Miter(x, tully) and not Think(tully, sarena) -> not Think(x, tully))\nforall x (Think(x, tully) -> not Outmarch(x, sarena))\nforall x (Miter(x, tully) and Think(tully, sarena) -> Miter(sarena, tully))\nforall x (Think(x, tully) and Think(tully, sarena) -> not Outmarch(x, tully))\nforall x (Think(x, tully) and not Outmarch(tully, sarena) -> not Parturient(tully))\nnot Miter(tully, sarena) and not Think(sarena, tully) -> Earliest(tully)\n\nMiter(tully, tully)\n\nThink(tully, sarena) and forall x (Think(x, sarena) -> Thenar(x)) -> therefore Thenar(tully) Thenar(tully) and forall x (Thenar(x) -> Miter(x, tully)) -> therefore Miter(tully, tully)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The roseline exhilarate the waverley. The roseline bituminise the waverley. The waverley exhilarate the roseline. If something exhilarate the waverley then it is mulish. If something is mulish then it bituminise the roseline. If something bituminise the roseline and the roseline does not chase the waverley then it does not chase the roseline. If something exhilarate the roseline then it does not visit the waverley. If something bituminise the roseline and the roseline exhilarate the waverley then the waverley bituminise the roseline. If something exhilarate the roseline and the roseline exhilarate the waverley then it does not visit the roseline. If something exhilarate the roseline and the roseline does not visit the waverley then the roseline is not prim. If the roseline does not see the waverley and the waverley does not chase the roseline then the roseline is tectonic. The roseline does not see the roseline.", "logic": "\nExhilarate(roseline, waverley)\nBituminise(roseline, waverley)\nExhilarate(waverley, roseline)\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, waverley) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Mulish(x) -> Bituminise(x, roseline))\nforall x (Bituminise(x, roseline) and not Exhilarate(roseline, waverley) -> not Exhilarate(x, roseline))\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, roseline) -> not Clutter(x, waverley))\nforall x (Bituminise(x, roseline) and Exhilarate(roseline, waverley) -> Bituminise(waverley, roseline))\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, roseline) and Exhilarate(roseline, waverley) -> not Clutter(x, roseline))\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, roseline) and not Clutter(roseline, waverley) -> not Prim(roseline))\nnot Bituminise(roseline, waverley) and not Exhilarate(waverley, roseline) -> Tectonic(roseline)\n\nnot Bituminise(roseline, roseline)\n\nExhilarate(roseline, waverley) and forall x (Exhilarate(x, waverley) -> Mulish(x)) -> therefore Mulish(roseline) Mulish(roseline) and forall x (Mulish(x) -> Bituminise(x, roseline)) -> therefore Bituminise(roseline, roseline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The iormina putter the jesus. The iormina herald the jesus. The jesus putter the iormina. If something putter the jesus then it is cyprinoid. If something is cyprinoid then it herald the iormina. If something herald the iormina and the iormina does not chase the jesus then it does not chase the iormina. If something putter the iormina then it does not visit the jesus. If something herald the iormina and the iormina putter the jesus then the jesus herald the iormina. If something putter the iormina and the iormina putter the jesus then it does not visit the iormina. If something putter the iormina and the iormina does not visit the jesus then the iormina is not nasal. If the iormina does not see the jesus and the jesus does not chase the iormina then the iormina is apparent. The jesus herald the iormina.", "logic": "\nPutter(iormina, jesus)\nHerald(iormina, jesus)\nPutter(jesus, iormina)\nforall x (Putter(x, jesus) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Cyprinoid(x) -> Herald(x, iormina))\nforall x (Herald(x, iormina) and not Putter(iormina, jesus) -> not Putter(x, iormina))\nforall x (Putter(x, iormina) -> not Pauperize(x, jesus))\nforall x (Herald(x, iormina) and Putter(iormina, jesus) -> Herald(jesus, iormina))\nforall x (Putter(x, iormina) and Putter(iormina, jesus) -> not Pauperize(x, iormina))\nforall x (Putter(x, iormina) and not Pauperize(iormina, jesus) -> not Nasal(iormina))\nnot Herald(iormina, jesus) and not Putter(jesus, iormina) -> Apparent(iormina)\n\nHerald(jesus, iormina)\n\nPutter(iormina, jesus) and forall x (Putter(x, jesus) -> Cyprinoid(x)) -> therefore Cyprinoid(iormina) Cyprinoid(iormina) and forall x (Cyprinoid(x) -> Herald(x, iormina)) -> therefore Herald(iormina, iormina) Herald(iormina, iormina) and Putter(iormina, jesus) and forall x (Herald(x, iormina) and Putter(iormina, jesus) -> Herald(jesus, iormina)) -> therefore Herald(jesus, iormina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The standford swinge the dwight. The standford chill the dwight. The dwight swinge the standford. If something swinge the dwight then it is zoonotic. If something is zoonotic then it chill the standford. If something chill the standford and the standford does not chase the dwight then it does not chase the standford. If something swinge the standford then it does not visit the dwight. If something chill the standford and the standford swinge the dwight then the dwight chill the standford. If something swinge the standford and the standford swinge the dwight then it does not visit the standford. If something swinge the standford and the standford does not visit the dwight then the standford is not chordate. If the standford does not see the dwight and the dwight does not chase the standford then the standford is rostrate. The dwight does not see the standford.", "logic": "\nSwinge(standford, dwight)\nChill(standford, dwight)\nSwinge(dwight, standford)\nforall x (Swinge(x, dwight) -> Zoonotic(x))\nforall x (Zoonotic(x) -> Chill(x, standford))\nforall x (Chill(x, standford) and not Swinge(standford, dwight) -> not Swinge(x, standford))\nforall x (Swinge(x, standford) -> not Bastardise(x, dwight))\nforall x (Chill(x, standford) and Swinge(standford, dwight) -> Chill(dwight, standford))\nforall x (Swinge(x, standford) and Swinge(standford, dwight) -> not Bastardise(x, standford))\nforall x (Swinge(x, standford) and not Bastardise(standford, dwight) -> not Chordate(standford))\nnot Chill(standford, dwight) and not Swinge(dwight, standford) -> Rostrate(standford)\n\nnot Chill(dwight, standford)\n\nSwinge(standford, dwight) and forall x (Swinge(x, dwight) -> Zoonotic(x)) -> therefore Zoonotic(standford) Zoonotic(standford) and forall x (Zoonotic(x) -> Chill(x, standford)) -> therefore Chill(standford, standford) Chill(standford, standford) and Swinge(standford, dwight) and forall x (Chill(x, standford) and Swinge(standford, dwight) -> Chill(dwight, standford)) -> therefore Chill(dwight, standford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The meier cover the derek. The meier decussate the derek. The derek cover the meier. If something cover the derek then it is elective. If something is elective then it decussate the meier. If something decussate the meier and the meier does not chase the derek then it does not chase the meier. If something cover the meier then it does not visit the derek. If something decussate the meier and the meier cover the derek then the derek decussate the meier. If something cover the meier and the meier cover the derek then it does not visit the meier. If something cover the meier and the meier does not visit the derek then the meier is not volant. If the meier does not see the derek and the derek does not chase the meier then the meier is gutsy. The meier is not gutsy.", "logic": "\nCover(meier, derek)\nDecussate(meier, derek)\nCover(derek, meier)\nforall x (Cover(x, derek) -> Elective(x))\nforall x (Elective(x) -> Decussate(x, meier))\nforall x (Decussate(x, meier) and not Cover(meier, derek) -> not Cover(x, meier))\nforall x (Cover(x, meier) -> not Airmail(x, derek))\nforall x (Decussate(x, meier) and Cover(meier, derek) -> Decussate(derek, meier))\nforall x (Cover(x, meier) and Cover(meier, derek) -> not Airmail(x, meier))\nforall x (Cover(x, meier) and not Airmail(meier, derek) -> not Volant(meier))\nnot Decussate(meier, derek) and not Cover(derek, meier) -> Gutsy(meier)\n\nnot Gutsy(meier)\n\nnot Decussate(meier, derek) and not Cover(derek, meier) -> Gutsy(meier) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The winn delude the gilligan. The winn further the gilligan. The gilligan delude the winn. If something delude the gilligan then it is causative. If something is causative then it further the winn. If something further the winn and the winn does not chase the gilligan then it does not chase the winn. If something delude the winn then it does not visit the gilligan. If something further the winn and the winn delude the gilligan then the gilligan further the winn. If something delude the winn and the winn delude the gilligan then it does not visit the winn. If something delude the winn and the winn does not visit the gilligan then the winn is not unpaired. If the winn does not see the gilligan and the gilligan does not chase the winn then the winn is asteroid. The gilligan is causative.", "logic": "\nDelude(winn, gilligan)\nFurther(winn, gilligan)\nDelude(gilligan, winn)\nforall x (Delude(x, gilligan) -> Causative(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) -> Further(x, winn))\nforall x (Further(x, winn) and not Delude(winn, gilligan) -> not Delude(x, winn))\nforall x (Delude(x, winn) -> not Inspect(x, gilligan))\nforall x (Further(x, winn) and Delude(winn, gilligan) -> Further(gilligan, winn))\nforall x (Delude(x, winn) and Delude(winn, gilligan) -> not Inspect(x, winn))\nforall x (Delude(x, winn) and not Inspect(winn, gilligan) -> not Unpaired(winn))\nnot Further(winn, gilligan) and not Delude(gilligan, winn) -> Asteroid(winn)\n\nCausative(gilligan)\n\nforall x (Delude(x, gilligan) -> Causative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The goober resinate the hanson. The goober crack the hanson. The hanson resinate the goober. If something resinate the hanson then it is abbatial. If something is abbatial then it crack the goober. If something crack the goober and the goober does not chase the hanson then it does not chase the goober. If something resinate the goober then it does not visit the hanson. If something crack the goober and the goober resinate the hanson then the hanson crack the goober. If something resinate the goober and the goober resinate the hanson then it does not visit the goober. If something resinate the goober and the goober does not visit the hanson then the goober is not eradicable. If the goober does not see the hanson and the hanson does not chase the goober then the goober is fearful. The goober is not eradicable.", "logic": "\nResinate(goober, hanson)\nCrack(goober, hanson)\nResinate(hanson, goober)\nforall x (Resinate(x, hanson) -> Abbatial(x))\nforall x (Abbatial(x) -> Crack(x, goober))\nforall x (Crack(x, goober) and not Resinate(goober, hanson) -> not Resinate(x, goober))\nforall x (Resinate(x, goober) -> not Frazzle(x, hanson))\nforall x (Crack(x, goober) and Resinate(goober, hanson) -> Crack(hanson, goober))\nforall x (Resinate(x, goober) and Resinate(goober, hanson) -> not Frazzle(x, goober))\nforall x (Resinate(x, goober) and not Frazzle(goober, hanson) -> not Eradicable(goober))\nnot Crack(goober, hanson) and not Resinate(hanson, goober) -> Fearful(goober)\n\nnot Eradicable(goober)\n\nnot Eradicable(goober) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The napoleon detoxify the kimbra. The napoleon yoke the kimbra. The kimbra detoxify the napoleon. If something detoxify the kimbra then it is tearless. If something is tearless then it yoke the napoleon. If something yoke the napoleon and the napoleon does not chase the kimbra then it does not chase the napoleon. If something detoxify the napoleon then it does not visit the kimbra. If something yoke the napoleon and the napoleon detoxify the kimbra then the kimbra yoke the napoleon. If something detoxify the napoleon and the napoleon detoxify the kimbra then it does not visit the napoleon. If something detoxify the napoleon and the napoleon does not visit the kimbra then the napoleon is not purplish. If the napoleon does not see the kimbra and the kimbra does not chase the napoleon then the napoleon is desultory. The kimbra is cold.", "logic": "\nDetoxify(napoleon, kimbra)\nYoke(napoleon, kimbra)\nDetoxify(kimbra, napoleon)\nforall x (Detoxify(x, kimbra) -> Tearless(x))\nforall x (Tearless(x) -> Yoke(x, napoleon))\nforall x (Yoke(x, napoleon) and not Detoxify(napoleon, kimbra) -> not Detoxify(x, napoleon))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, napoleon) -> not Crease(x, kimbra))\nforall x (Yoke(x, napoleon) and Detoxify(napoleon, kimbra) -> Yoke(kimbra, napoleon))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, napoleon) and Detoxify(napoleon, kimbra) -> not Crease(x, napoleon))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, napoleon) and not Crease(napoleon, kimbra) -> not Purplish(napoleon))\nnot Yoke(napoleon, kimbra) and not Detoxify(kimbra, napoleon) -> Desultory(napoleon)\n\nCold(kimbra)\n\nCold(kimbra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The steven beleaguer the ronnica. The steven disarm the ronnica. The ronnica beleaguer the steven. If something beleaguer the ronnica then it is tined. If something is tined then it disarm the steven. If something disarm the steven and the steven does not chase the ronnica then it does not chase the steven. If something beleaguer the steven then it does not visit the ronnica. If something disarm the steven and the steven beleaguer the ronnica then the ronnica disarm the steven. If something beleaguer the steven and the steven beleaguer the ronnica then it does not visit the steven. If something beleaguer the steven and the steven does not visit the ronnica then the steven is not lusterless. If the steven does not see the ronnica and the ronnica does not chase the steven then the steven is correlated. The steven is not cold.", "logic": "\nBeleaguer(steven, ronnica)\nDisarm(steven, ronnica)\nBeleaguer(ronnica, steven)\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, ronnica) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Disarm(x, steven))\nforall x (Disarm(x, steven) and not Beleaguer(steven, ronnica) -> not Beleaguer(x, steven))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, steven) -> not Delight(x, ronnica))\nforall x (Disarm(x, steven) and Beleaguer(steven, ronnica) -> Disarm(ronnica, steven))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, steven) and Beleaguer(steven, ronnica) -> not Delight(x, steven))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, steven) and not Delight(steven, ronnica) -> not Lusterless(steven))\nnot Disarm(steven, ronnica) and not Beleaguer(ronnica, steven) -> Correlated(steven)\n\nnot Cold(steven)\n\nnot Cold(steven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The norean forswear the mahmoud. The norean honey the mahmoud. The mahmoud forswear the norean. If something forswear the mahmoud then it is valueless. If something is valueless then it honey the norean. If something honey the norean and the norean does not chase the mahmoud then it does not chase the norean. If something forswear the norean then it does not visit the mahmoud. If something honey the norean and the norean forswear the mahmoud then the mahmoud honey the norean. If something forswear the norean and the norean forswear the mahmoud then it does not visit the norean. If something forswear the norean and the norean does not visit the mahmoud then the norean is not genotypic. If the norean does not see the mahmoud and the mahmoud does not chase the norean then the norean is touching. The mahmoud is touching.", "logic": "\nForswear(norean, mahmoud)\nHoney(norean, mahmoud)\nForswear(mahmoud, norean)\nforall x (Forswear(x, mahmoud) -> Valueless(x))\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> Honey(x, norean))\nforall x (Honey(x, norean) and not Forswear(norean, mahmoud) -> not Forswear(x, norean))\nforall x (Forswear(x, norean) -> not Idolise(x, mahmoud))\nforall x (Honey(x, norean) and Forswear(norean, mahmoud) -> Honey(mahmoud, norean))\nforall x (Forswear(x, norean) and Forswear(norean, mahmoud) -> not Idolise(x, norean))\nforall x (Forswear(x, norean) and not Idolise(norean, mahmoud) -> not Genotypic(norean))\nnot Honey(norean, mahmoud) and not Forswear(mahmoud, norean) -> Touching(norean)\n\nTouching(mahmoud)\n\nTouching(mahmoud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The witty revamp the vannie. The witty thrum the vannie. The vannie revamp the witty. If something revamp the vannie then it is puny. If something is puny then it thrum the witty. If something thrum the witty and the witty does not chase the vannie then it does not chase the witty. If something revamp the witty then it does not visit the vannie. If something thrum the witty and the witty revamp the vannie then the vannie thrum the witty. If something revamp the witty and the witty revamp the vannie then it does not visit the witty. If something revamp the witty and the witty does not visit the vannie then the witty is not coaxial. If the witty does not see the vannie and the vannie does not chase the witty then the witty is austere. The witty does not visit the witty.", "logic": "\nRevamp(witty, vannie)\nThrum(witty, vannie)\nRevamp(vannie, witty)\nforall x (Revamp(x, vannie) -> Puny(x))\nforall x (Puny(x) -> Thrum(x, witty))\nforall x (Thrum(x, witty) and not Revamp(witty, vannie) -> not Revamp(x, witty))\nforall x (Revamp(x, witty) -> not Intercede(x, vannie))\nforall x (Thrum(x, witty) and Revamp(witty, vannie) -> Thrum(vannie, witty))\nforall x (Revamp(x, witty) and Revamp(witty, vannie) -> not Intercede(x, witty))\nforall x (Revamp(x, witty) and not Intercede(witty, vannie) -> not Coaxial(witty))\nnot Thrum(witty, vannie) and not Revamp(vannie, witty) -> Austere(witty)\n\nnot Intercede(witty, witty)\n\nnot Intercede(witty, witty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "The tressa waffle the emera. The tressa embolden the emera. The emera waffle the tressa. If something waffle the emera then it is peregrine. If something is peregrine then it embolden the tressa. If something embolden the tressa and the tressa does not chase the emera then it does not chase the tressa. If something waffle the tressa then it does not visit the emera. If something embolden the tressa and the tressa waffle the emera then the emera embolden the tressa. If something waffle the tressa and the tressa waffle the emera then it does not visit the tressa. If something waffle the tressa and the tressa does not visit the emera then the tressa is not comal. If the tressa does not see the emera and the emera does not chase the tressa then the tressa is galwegian. The emera is nice.", "logic": "\nWaffle(tressa, emera)\nEmbolden(tressa, emera)\nWaffle(emera, tressa)\nforall x (Waffle(x, emera) -> Peregrine(x))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Embolden(x, tressa))\nforall x (Embolden(x, tressa) and not Waffle(tressa, emera) -> not Waffle(x, tressa))\nforall x (Waffle(x, tressa) -> not Munch(x, emera))\nforall x (Embolden(x, tressa) and Waffle(tressa, emera) -> Embolden(emera, tressa))\nforall x (Waffle(x, tressa) and Waffle(tressa, emera) -> not Munch(x, tressa))\nforall x (Waffle(x, tressa) and not Munch(tressa, emera) -> not Comal(tressa))\nnot Embolden(tressa, emera) and not Waffle(emera, tressa) -> Galwegian(tressa)\n\nNice(emera)\n\nNice(emera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-95"} {"premises": "Donielle is better. Fidelity is unpillared. Nickie is faraway. Chip is awake. All faraway things are sombre. All awake things are chancrous. All chancrous things are mediatory. If something is sombre then it is unpillared. If something is chancrous then it is mediatory. Big, mediatory things are sombre. All awake things are chancrous. If something is chancrous then it is unpillared. Donielle is better.", "logic": "\nBetter(donielle)\nUnpillared(fidelity)\nFaraway(nickie)\nAwake(chip)\nforall x (Faraway(x) -> Sombre(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Chancrous(x))\nforall x (Chancrous(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nforall x (Sombre(x) -> Unpillared(x))\nforall x (Chancrous(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nforall x (Unpillared(x) and Mediatory(x) -> Sombre(x))\nforall x (Awake(x) -> Chancrous(x))\nforall x (Chancrous(x) -> Unpillared(x))\n\nBetter(donielle)\n\ntherefore Better(donielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Nevin is felonious. Tyne is apian. Melita is sessile. Abbie is dexter. All sessile things are seasoned. All dexter things are genoese. All genoese things are cereal. If something is seasoned then it is apian. If something is genoese then it is cereal. Big, cereal things are seasoned. All dexter things are genoese. If something is genoese then it is apian. Tyne is not apian.", "logic": "\nFelonious(nevin)\nApian(tyne)\nSessile(melita)\nDexter(abbie)\nforall x (Sessile(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Dexter(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Genoese(x) -> Cereal(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) -> Apian(x))\nforall x (Genoese(x) -> Cereal(x))\nforall x (Apian(x) and Cereal(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Dexter(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Genoese(x) -> Apian(x))\n\nnot Apian(tyne)\n\ntherefore Apian(tyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Melvyn is anarchic. Lizabeth is custom. Maya is vapid. Eustacia is basiscopic. All vapid things are nominative. All basiscopic things are concerted. All concerted things are crosstown. If something is nominative then it is custom. If something is concerted then it is crosstown. Big, crosstown things are nominative. All basiscopic things are concerted. If something is concerted then it is custom. Maya is nominative.", "logic": "\nAnarchic(melvyn)\nCustom(lizabeth)\nVapid(maya)\nBasiscopic(eustacia)\nforall x (Vapid(x) -> Nominative(x))\nforall x (Basiscopic(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Nominative(x) -> Custom(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Custom(x) and Crosstown(x) -> Nominative(x))\nforall x (Basiscopic(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Custom(x))\n\nNominative(maya)\n\nVapid(maya) and forall x (Vapid(x) -> Nominative(x)) -> therefore Nominative(maya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Natale is ophthalmic. Nicoline is cypriot. Clay is huxleian. Zaria is lengthened. All huxleian things are crannied. All lengthened things are avaricious. All avaricious things are ctenoid. If something is crannied then it is cypriot. If something is avaricious then it is ctenoid. Big, ctenoid things are crannied. All lengthened things are avaricious. If something is avaricious then it is cypriot. Clay is not crannied.", "logic": "\nOphthalmic(natale)\nCypriot(nicoline)\nHuxleian(clay)\nLengthened(zaria)\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Ctenoid(x))\nforall x (Crannied(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Ctenoid(x))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and Ctenoid(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nforall x (Avaricious(x) -> Cypriot(x))\n\nnot Crannied(clay)\n\nHuxleian(clay) and forall x (Huxleian(x) -> Crannied(x)) -> therefore Crannied(clay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Dolly is variant. Germaine is senecan. Daisie is bulging. Adriaens is stung. All bulging things are disjoined. All stung things are dateable. All dateable things are skinless. If something is disjoined then it is senecan. If something is dateable then it is skinless. Big, skinless things are disjoined. All stung things are dateable. If something is dateable then it is senecan. Adriaens is skinless.", "logic": "\nVariant(dolly)\nSenecan(germaine)\nBulging(daisie)\nStung(adriaens)\nforall x (Bulging(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Skinless(x))\nforall x (Disjoined(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Skinless(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) and Skinless(x) -> Disjoined(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Senecan(x))\n\nSkinless(adriaens)\n\nStung(adriaens) and forall x (Stung(x) -> Dateable(x)) -> therefore Dateable(adriaens) Dateable(adriaens) and forall x (Dateable(x) -> Skinless(x)) -> therefore Skinless(adriaens)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Powell is soiled. Stephana is dank. Alleen is useable. Sheffy is sedate. All useable things are unposed. All sedate things are partitive. All partitive things are invertible. If something is unposed then it is dank. If something is partitive then it is invertible. Big, invertible things are unposed. All sedate things are partitive. If something is partitive then it is dank. Alleen is not dank.", "logic": "\nSoiled(powell)\nDank(stephana)\nUseable(alleen)\nSedate(sheffy)\nforall x (Useable(x) -> Unposed(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) -> Partitive(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Invertible(x))\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Dank(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Invertible(x))\nforall x (Dank(x) and Invertible(x) -> Unposed(x))\nforall x (Sedate(x) -> Partitive(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Dank(x))\n\nnot Dank(alleen)\n\nUseable(alleen) and forall x (Useable(x) -> Unposed(x)) -> therefore Unposed(alleen) Unposed(alleen) and forall x (Unposed(x) -> Dank(x)) -> therefore Dank(alleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Franz is possessive. Toddy is mousey. Napoleon is boring. Zarla is chechen. All boring things are blistery. All chechen things are negro. All negro things are lacrimal. If something is blistery then it is mousey. If something is negro then it is lacrimal. Big, lacrimal things are blistery. All chechen things are negro. If something is negro then it is mousey. Zarla is blistery.", "logic": "\nPossessive(franz)\nMousey(toddy)\nBoring(napoleon)\nChechen(zarla)\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Negro(x))\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Mousey(x))\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Lacrimal(x))\nforall x (Mousey(x) and Lacrimal(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Negro(x))\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Mousey(x))\n\nBlistery(zarla)\n\nChechen(zarla) and forall x (Chechen(x) -> Negro(x)) -> therefore Negro(zarla) Negro(zarla) and forall x (Negro(x) -> Mousey(x)) -> therefore Mousey(zarla) Chechen(zarla) and forall x (Chechen(x) -> Negro(x)) -> therefore Negro(zarla) Negro(zarla) and forall x (Negro(x) -> Lacrimal(x)) -> therefore Lacrimal(zarla) Mousey(zarla) and Lacrimal(zarla) and forall x (Mousey(x) and Lacrimal(x) -> Blistery(x)) -> therefore Blistery(zarla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Jessalin is unratified. Avie is maximal. Reginald is recessed. Ruddy is wary. All recessed things are colombian. All wary things are centered. All centered things are unthinking. If something is colombian then it is maximal. If something is centered then it is unthinking. Big, unthinking things are colombian. All wary things are centered. If something is centered then it is maximal. Ruddy is not colombian.", "logic": "\nUnratified(jessalin)\nMaximal(avie)\nRecessed(reginald)\nWary(ruddy)\nforall x (Recessed(x) -> Colombian(x))\nforall x (Wary(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Colombian(x) -> Maximal(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) and Unthinking(x) -> Colombian(x))\nforall x (Wary(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Maximal(x))\n\nnot Colombian(ruddy)\n\nWary(ruddy) and forall x (Wary(x) -> Centered(x)) -> therefore Centered(ruddy) Centered(ruddy) and forall x (Centered(x) -> Maximal(x)) -> therefore Maximal(ruddy) Wary(ruddy) and forall x (Wary(x) -> Centered(x)) -> therefore Centered(ruddy) Centered(ruddy) and forall x (Centered(x) -> Unthinking(x)) -> therefore Unthinking(ruddy) Maximal(ruddy) and Unthinking(ruddy) and forall x (Maximal(x) and Unthinking(x) -> Colombian(x)) -> therefore Colombian(ruddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Renelle is diurnal. Viva is enchained. Hale is ruled. Lila is excellent. All ruled things are moroccan. All excellent things are downwind. All downwind things are nonsense. If something is moroccan then it is enchained. If something is downwind then it is nonsense. Big, nonsense things are moroccan. All excellent things are downwind. If something is downwind then it is enchained. Hale is not downwind.", "logic": "\nDiurnal(renelle)\nEnchained(viva)\nRuled(hale)\nExcellent(lila)\nforall x (Ruled(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Downwind(x))\nforall x (Downwind(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Downwind(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nforall x (Enchained(x) and Nonsense(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Downwind(x))\nforall x (Downwind(x) -> Enchained(x))\n\nnot Downwind(hale)\n\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Downwind(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Lissie is bicyclic. Edi is slashed. Darleen is provable. Sheila is katari. All provable things are permissive. All katari things are stifled. All stifled things are korean. If something is permissive then it is slashed. If something is stifled then it is korean. Big, korean things are permissive. All katari things are stifled. If something is stifled then it is slashed. Edi is korean.", "logic": "\nBicyclic(lissie)\nSlashed(edi)\nProvable(darleen)\nKatari(sheila)\nforall x (Provable(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Korean(x))\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Slashed(x))\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Korean(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) and Korean(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Katari(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Slashed(x))\n\nKorean(edi)\n\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Korean(x)) <- forall x (Katari(x) -> Stifled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Aleece is sorry. Binny is hardfisted. Malva is misshapen. Julianne is cxxx. All misshapen things are sometime. All cxxx things are edible. All edible things are outdoorsy. If something is sometime then it is hardfisted. If something is edible then it is outdoorsy. Big, outdoorsy things are sometime. All cxxx things are edible. If something is edible then it is hardfisted. Aleece is not edible.", "logic": "\nSorry(aleece)\nHardfisted(binny)\nMisshapen(malva)\nCxxx(julianne)\nforall x (Misshapen(x) -> Sometime(x))\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Edible(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Sometime(x) -> Hardfisted(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) and Outdoorsy(x) -> Sometime(x))\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Edible(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Hardfisted(x))\n\nnot Edible(aleece)\n\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Edible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Suzi is premature. Katey is annoyed. Vernon is corrupt. Rosanne is vivacious. All corrupt things are blushful. All vivacious things are unsaddled. All unsaddled things are romany. If something is blushful then it is annoyed. If something is unsaddled then it is romany. Big, romany things are blushful. All vivacious things are unsaddled. If something is unsaddled then it is annoyed. Katey is blushful.", "logic": "\nPremature(suzi)\nAnnoyed(katey)\nCorrupt(vernon)\nVivacious(rosanne)\nforall x (Corrupt(x) -> Blushful(x))\nforall x (Vivacious(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Romany(x))\nforall x (Blushful(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Romany(x))\nforall x (Annoyed(x) and Romany(x) -> Blushful(x))\nforall x (Vivacious(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Annoyed(x))\n\nBlushful(katey)\n\nforall x (Annoyed(x) and Romany(x) -> Blushful(x)) <- forall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Romany(x)) <- forall x (Vivacious(x) -> Unsaddled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Brandy is subaquatic. Dorothee is xxxii. Michell is daunted. Marketa is abstinent. All daunted things are proud. All abstinent things are illusory. All illusory things are nativist. If something is proud then it is xxxii. If something is illusory then it is nativist. Big, nativist things are proud. All abstinent things are illusory. If something is illusory then it is xxxii. Michell is not abstinent.", "logic": "\nSubaquatic(brandy)\nXxxii(dorothee)\nDaunted(michell)\nAbstinent(marketa)\nforall x (Daunted(x) -> Proud(x))\nforall x (Abstinent(x) -> Illusory(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Nativist(x))\nforall x (Proud(x) -> Xxxii(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Nativist(x))\nforall x (Xxxii(x) and Nativist(x) -> Proud(x))\nforall x (Abstinent(x) -> Illusory(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Xxxii(x))\n\nnot Abstinent(michell)\n\nnot Abstinent(michell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Buck is miserable. Elsa is precursory. Bonita is monovalent. Friedric is clinquant. All monovalent things are azure. All clinquant things are whippy. All whippy things are identified. If something is azure then it is precursory. If something is whippy then it is identified. Big, identified things are azure. All clinquant things are whippy. If something is whippy then it is precursory. Buck is clinquant.", "logic": "\nMiserable(buck)\nPrecursory(elsa)\nMonovalent(bonita)\nClinquant(friedric)\nforall x (Monovalent(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Clinquant(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Whippy(x) -> Identified(x))\nforall x (Azure(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Whippy(x) -> Identified(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) and Identified(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Clinquant(x) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Whippy(x) -> Precursory(x))\n\nClinquant(buck)\n\nClinquant(buck) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Eimile is dedicated. Chaddy is deceptive. Tabitha is educated. Bessy is logy. All educated things are adsorbent. All logy things are doubled. All doubled things are aperient. If something is adsorbent then it is deceptive. If something is doubled then it is aperient. Big, aperient things are adsorbent. All logy things are doubled. If something is doubled then it is deceptive. Chaddy is not educated.", "logic": "\nDedicated(eimile)\nDeceptive(chaddy)\nEducated(tabitha)\nLogy(bessy)\nforall x (Educated(x) -> Adsorbent(x))\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Doubled(x))\nforall x (Doubled(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Deceptive(x))\nforall x (Doubled(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Deceptive(x) and Aperient(x) -> Adsorbent(x))\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Doubled(x))\nforall x (Doubled(x) -> Deceptive(x))\n\nnot Educated(chaddy)\n\nnot Educated(chaddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "Laurent is rimmed. Northrop is burnt. Rad is instinct. Sheelagh is modernised. All instinct things are aetiologic. All modernised things are henpecked. All henpecked things are frenzied. If something is aetiologic then it is burnt. If something is henpecked then it is frenzied. Big, frenzied things are aetiologic. All modernised things are henpecked. If something is henpecked then it is burnt. Sheelagh is instinct.", "logic": "\nRimmed(laurent)\nBurnt(northrop)\nInstinct(rad)\nModernised(sheelagh)\nforall x (Instinct(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> Henpecked(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Frenzied(x))\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Burnt(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Frenzied(x))\nforall x (Burnt(x) and Frenzied(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> Henpecked(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Burnt(x))\n\nInstinct(sheelagh)\n\nInstinct(sheelagh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-553"} {"premises": "The sloane is dumb. The sloane is florid. The sloane is dabbled. All florid people are dumb. If the sloane is anchoritic and the sloane is not dumb then the sloane is epizoan. The sloane is dumb.", "logic": "\nDumb(sloane)\nFlorid(sloane)\nDabbled(sloane)\nforall x (Florid(x) -> Dumb(x))\nAnchoritic(sloane) and not Dumb(sloane) -> Epizoan(sloane)\n\nDumb(sloane)\n\ntherefore Dumb(sloane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-788"} {"premises": "The dylan is provable. The dylan is brooding. The dylan is pyogenic. All brooding people are provable. If the dylan is ameboid and the dylan is not provable then the dylan is mundane. The dylan is not brooding.", "logic": "\nProvable(dylan)\nBrooding(dylan)\nPyogenic(dylan)\nforall x (Brooding(x) -> Provable(x))\nAmeboid(dylan) and not Provable(dylan) -> Mundane(dylan)\n\nnot Brooding(dylan)\n\ntherefore Brooding(dylan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-788"} {"premises": "The margarete is backhand. The margarete is unpackaged. The margarete is ratable. All unpackaged people are backhand. If the margarete is prudish and the margarete is not backhand then the margarete is silverish. The margarete is not silverish.", "logic": "\nBackhand(margarete)\nUnpackaged(margarete)\nRatable(margarete)\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Backhand(x))\nPrudish(margarete) and not Backhand(margarete) -> Silverish(margarete)\n\nnot Silverish(margarete)\n\nPrudish(margarete) and not Backhand(margarete) -> Silverish(margarete) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-788"} {"premises": "The penrod is chinked. The penrod is tatty. The penrod is submissive. All tatty people are chinked. If the penrod is upstairs and the penrod is not chinked then the penrod is grilled. The penrod sees the penrod.", "logic": "\nChinked(penrod)\nTatty(penrod)\nSubmissive(penrod)\nforall x (Tatty(x) -> Chinked(x))\nUpstairs(penrod) and not Chinked(penrod) -> Grilled(penrod)\n\nSees(penrod, penrod)\n\nSees(penrod, penrod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-788"} {"premises": "Kerianne is bloody. If someone is murderous then they are schematic. If Kerianne is not schematic and Kerianne is not murderous then Kerianne is not bloody. If someone is bloody then they are not shady. Kerianne is bloody.", "logic": "\nBloody(kerianne)\nforall x (Murderous(x) -> Schematic(x))\nnot Schematic(kerianne) and not Murderous(kerianne) -> not Bloody(kerianne)\nforall x (Bloody(x) -> not Shady(x))\n\nBloody(kerianne)\n\ntherefore Bloody(kerianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1019"} {"premises": "Tatum is maroon. If someone is trinuclear then they are annoyed. If Tatum is not annoyed and Tatum is not trinuclear then Tatum is not maroon. If someone is maroon then they are not utter. Tatum is not maroon.", "logic": "\nMaroon(tatum)\nforall x (Trinuclear(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nnot Annoyed(tatum) and not Trinuclear(tatum) -> not Maroon(tatum)\nforall x (Maroon(x) -> not Utter(x))\n\nnot Maroon(tatum)\n\ntherefore Maroon(tatum)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1019"} {"premises": "Vernor is inevitable. If someone is petite then they are unstilted. If Vernor is not unstilted and Vernor is not petite then Vernor is not inevitable. If someone is inevitable then they are not angled. Vernor is not unstilted.", "logic": "\nInevitable(vernor)\nforall x (Petite(x) -> Unstilted(x))\nnot Unstilted(vernor) and not Petite(vernor) -> not Inevitable(vernor)\nforall x (Inevitable(x) -> not Angled(x))\n\nnot Unstilted(vernor)\n\nforall x (Petite(x) -> Unstilted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1019"} {"premises": "Gerald is hulky. If someone is otic then they are alienable. If Gerald is not alienable and Gerald is not otic then Gerald is not hulky. If someone is hulky then they are not ungulated. Gerald is red.", "logic": "\nHulky(gerald)\nforall x (Otic(x) -> Alienable(x))\nnot Alienable(gerald) and not Otic(gerald) -> not Hulky(gerald)\nforall x (Hulky(x) -> not Ungulated(x))\n\nRed(gerald)\n\nRed(gerald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1019"} {"premises": "The barnie is spiderly. The barnie is idealised. The barnie demean the norwood. The norwood is bountied. The norwood is idealised. The norwood deglaze the barnie. The norwood demean the barnie. If something deglaze the norwood and it does not eat the barnie then the barnie is not peaceful. If something deglaze the barnie and it is unpainted then the barnie deglaze the norwood. If the barnie does not eat the norwood then the barnie does not need the norwood. All idealised things are unpainted. If something deglaze the norwood then it deglaze the barnie. If something is unpainted and it demean the norwood then the norwood deglaze the barnie. The barnie demean the norwood.", "logic": "\nSpiderly(barnie)\nIdealised(barnie)\nDemean(barnie, norwood)\nBountied(norwood)\nIdealised(norwood)\nDeglaze(norwood, barnie)\nDemean(norwood, barnie)\nforall x (Deglaze(x, norwood) and not Reconcile(x, barnie) -> not Peaceful(barnie))\nforall x (Deglaze(x, barnie) and Unpainted(x) -> Deglaze(barnie, norwood))\nnot Reconcile(barnie, norwood) -> not Deglaze(barnie, norwood)\nforall x (Idealised(x) -> Unpainted(x))\nforall x (Deglaze(x, norwood) -> Deglaze(x, barnie))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Demean(x, norwood) -> Deglaze(norwood, barnie))\n\nDemean(barnie, norwood)\n\ntherefore Demean(barnie, norwood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The esau is compact. The esau is reverent. The esau perspire the churchill. The churchill is mint. The churchill is reverent. The churchill depopulate the esau. The churchill perspire the esau. If something depopulate the churchill and it does not eat the esau then the esau is not saddled. If something depopulate the esau and it is token then the esau depopulate the churchill. If the esau does not eat the churchill then the esau does not need the churchill. All reverent things are token. If something depopulate the churchill then it depopulate the esau. If something is token and it perspire the churchill then the churchill depopulate the esau. The esau is not compact.", "logic": "\nCompact(esau)\nReverent(esau)\nPerspire(esau, churchill)\nMint(churchill)\nReverent(churchill)\nDepopulate(churchill, esau)\nPerspire(churchill, esau)\nforall x (Depopulate(x, churchill) and not Streetwalk(x, esau) -> not Saddled(esau))\nforall x (Depopulate(x, esau) and Token(x) -> Depopulate(esau, churchill))\nnot Streetwalk(esau, churchill) -> not Depopulate(esau, churchill)\nforall x (Reverent(x) -> Token(x))\nforall x (Depopulate(x, churchill) -> Depopulate(x, esau))\nforall x (Token(x) and Perspire(x, churchill) -> Depopulate(churchill, esau))\n\nnot Compact(esau)\n\ntherefore Compact(esau)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The tabatha is unanswered. The tabatha is meatless. The tabatha flounce the zenia. The zenia is crowing. The zenia is meatless. The zenia quiz the tabatha. The zenia flounce the tabatha. If something quiz the zenia and it does not eat the tabatha then the tabatha is not ersatz. If something quiz the tabatha and it is ashen then the tabatha quiz the zenia. If the tabatha does not eat the zenia then the tabatha does not need the zenia. All meatless things are ashen. If something quiz the zenia then it quiz the tabatha. If something is ashen and it flounce the zenia then the zenia quiz the tabatha. The zenia is ashen.", "logic": "\nUnanswered(tabatha)\nMeatless(tabatha)\nFlounce(tabatha, zenia)\nCrowing(zenia)\nMeatless(zenia)\nQuiz(zenia, tabatha)\nFlounce(zenia, tabatha)\nforall x (Quiz(x, zenia) and not Incrust(x, tabatha) -> not Ersatz(tabatha))\nforall x (Quiz(x, tabatha) and Ashen(x) -> Quiz(tabatha, zenia))\nnot Incrust(tabatha, zenia) -> not Quiz(tabatha, zenia)\nforall x (Meatless(x) -> Ashen(x))\nforall x (Quiz(x, zenia) -> Quiz(x, tabatha))\nforall x (Ashen(x) and Flounce(x, zenia) -> Quiz(zenia, tabatha))\n\nAshen(zenia)\n\nMeatless(zenia) and forall x (Meatless(x) -> Ashen(x)) -> therefore Ashen(zenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The malorie is occlusive. The malorie is offhanded. The malorie wrench the westbrook. The westbrook is aflicker. The westbrook is offhanded. The westbrook supinate the malorie. The westbrook wrench the malorie. If something supinate the westbrook and it does not eat the malorie then the malorie is not lamentable. If something supinate the malorie and it is rejective then the malorie supinate the westbrook. If the malorie does not eat the westbrook then the malorie does not need the westbrook. All offhanded things are rejective. If something supinate the westbrook then it supinate the malorie. If something is rejective and it wrench the westbrook then the westbrook supinate the malorie. The malorie is not rejective.", "logic": "\nOcclusive(malorie)\nOffhanded(malorie)\nWrench(malorie, westbrook)\nAflicker(westbrook)\nOffhanded(westbrook)\nSupinate(westbrook, malorie)\nWrench(westbrook, malorie)\nforall x (Supinate(x, westbrook) and not Surge(x, malorie) -> not Lamentable(malorie))\nforall x (Supinate(x, malorie) and Rejective(x) -> Supinate(malorie, westbrook))\nnot Surge(malorie, westbrook) -> not Supinate(malorie, westbrook)\nforall x (Offhanded(x) -> Rejective(x))\nforall x (Supinate(x, westbrook) -> Supinate(x, malorie))\nforall x (Rejective(x) and Wrench(x, westbrook) -> Supinate(westbrook, malorie))\n\nnot Rejective(malorie)\n\nOffhanded(malorie) and forall x (Offhanded(x) -> Rejective(x)) -> therefore Rejective(malorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The vivianne is adorable. The vivianne is soothing. The vivianne audit the evanne. The evanne is brainless. The evanne is soothing. The evanne double the vivianne. The evanne audit the vivianne. If something double the evanne and it does not eat the vivianne then the vivianne is not ulterior. If something double the vivianne and it is ampullary then the vivianne double the evanne. If the vivianne does not eat the evanne then the vivianne does not need the evanne. All soothing things are ampullary. If something double the evanne then it double the vivianne. If something is ampullary and it audit the evanne then the evanne double the vivianne. The vivianne double the evanne.", "logic": "\nAdorable(vivianne)\nSoothing(vivianne)\nAudit(vivianne, evanne)\nBrainless(evanne)\nSoothing(evanne)\nDouble(evanne, vivianne)\nAudit(evanne, vivianne)\nforall x (Double(x, evanne) and not Verse(x, vivianne) -> not Ulterior(vivianne))\nforall x (Double(x, vivianne) and Ampullary(x) -> Double(vivianne, evanne))\nnot Verse(vivianne, evanne) -> not Double(vivianne, evanne)\nforall x (Soothing(x) -> Ampullary(x))\nforall x (Double(x, evanne) -> Double(x, vivianne))\nforall x (Ampullary(x) and Audit(x, evanne) -> Double(evanne, vivianne))\n\nDouble(vivianne, evanne)\n\nSoothing(evanne) and forall x (Soothing(x) -> Ampullary(x)) -> therefore Ampullary(evanne) Double(evanne, vivianne) and Ampullary(evanne) and forall x (Double(x, vivianne) and Ampullary(x) -> Double(vivianne, evanne)) -> therefore Double(vivianne, evanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The lex is bust. The lex is pictured. The lex dope the lillian. The lillian is spicy. The lillian is pictured. The lillian behoove the lex. The lillian dope the lex. If something behoove the lillian and it does not eat the lex then the lex is not parched. If something behoove the lex and it is zygomatic then the lex behoove the lillian. If the lex does not eat the lillian then the lex does not need the lillian. All pictured things are zygomatic. If something behoove the lillian then it behoove the lex. If something is zygomatic and it dope the lillian then the lillian behoove the lex. The lex does not need the lillian.", "logic": "\nBust(lex)\nPictured(lex)\nDope(lex, lillian)\nSpicy(lillian)\nPictured(lillian)\nBehoove(lillian, lex)\nDope(lillian, lex)\nforall x (Behoove(x, lillian) and not Mastermind(x, lex) -> not Parched(lex))\nforall x (Behoove(x, lex) and Zygomatic(x) -> Behoove(lex, lillian))\nnot Mastermind(lex, lillian) -> not Behoove(lex, lillian)\nforall x (Pictured(x) -> Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Behoove(x, lillian) -> Behoove(x, lex))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and Dope(x, lillian) -> Behoove(lillian, lex))\n\nnot Behoove(lex, lillian)\n\nPictured(lillian) and forall x (Pictured(x) -> Zygomatic(x)) -> therefore Zygomatic(lillian) Behoove(lillian, lex) and Zygomatic(lillian) and forall x (Behoove(x, lex) and Zygomatic(x) -> Behoove(lex, lillian)) -> therefore Behoove(lex, lillian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The belinda is blocky. The belinda is unbodied. The belinda balk the johann. The johann is sugary. The johann is unbodied. The johann task the belinda. The johann balk the belinda. If something task the johann and it does not eat the belinda then the belinda is not unbloody. If something task the belinda and it is sanious then the belinda task the johann. If the belinda does not eat the johann then the belinda does not need the johann. All unbodied things are sanious. If something task the johann then it task the belinda. If something is sanious and it balk the johann then the johann task the belinda. The belinda task the belinda.", "logic": "\nBlocky(belinda)\nUnbodied(belinda)\nBalk(belinda, johann)\nSugary(johann)\nUnbodied(johann)\nTask(johann, belinda)\nBalk(johann, belinda)\nforall x (Task(x, johann) and not Slam(x, belinda) -> not Unbloody(belinda))\nforall x (Task(x, belinda) and Sanious(x) -> Task(belinda, johann))\nnot Slam(belinda, johann) -> not Task(belinda, johann)\nforall x (Unbodied(x) -> Sanious(x))\nforall x (Task(x, johann) -> Task(x, belinda))\nforall x (Sanious(x) and Balk(x, johann) -> Task(johann, belinda))\n\nTask(belinda, belinda)\n\nUnbodied(johann) and forall x (Unbodied(x) -> Sanious(x)) -> therefore Sanious(johann) Task(johann, belinda) and Sanious(johann) and forall x (Task(x, belinda) and Sanious(x) -> Task(belinda, johann)) -> therefore Task(belinda, johann) Task(belinda, johann) and forall x (Task(x, johann) -> Task(x, belinda)) -> therefore Task(belinda, belinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The moreen is moblike. The moreen is unfrozen. The moreen oversew the job. The job is dazzled. The job is unfrozen. The job unlade the moreen. The job oversew the moreen. If something unlade the job and it does not eat the moreen then the moreen is not palpebrate. If something unlade the moreen and it is observant then the moreen unlade the job. If the moreen does not eat the job then the moreen does not need the job. All unfrozen things are observant. If something unlade the job then it unlade the moreen. If something is observant and it oversew the job then the job unlade the moreen. The moreen does not need the moreen.", "logic": "\nMoblike(moreen)\nUnfrozen(moreen)\nOversew(moreen, job)\nDazzled(job)\nUnfrozen(job)\nUnlade(job, moreen)\nOversew(job, moreen)\nforall x (Unlade(x, job) and not Summon(x, moreen) -> not Palpebrate(moreen))\nforall x (Unlade(x, moreen) and Observant(x) -> Unlade(moreen, job))\nnot Summon(moreen, job) -> not Unlade(moreen, job)\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Observant(x))\nforall x (Unlade(x, job) -> Unlade(x, moreen))\nforall x (Observant(x) and Oversew(x, job) -> Unlade(job, moreen))\n\nnot Unlade(moreen, moreen)\n\nUnfrozen(job) and forall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Observant(x)) -> therefore Observant(job) Unlade(job, moreen) and Observant(job) and forall x (Unlade(x, moreen) and Observant(x) -> Unlade(moreen, job)) -> therefore Unlade(moreen, job) Unlade(moreen, job) and forall x (Unlade(x, job) -> Unlade(x, moreen)) -> therefore Unlade(moreen, moreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The miquela is contested. The miquela is pretorian. The miquela sloganeer the leticia. The leticia is swish. The leticia is pretorian. The leticia slake the miquela. The leticia sloganeer the miquela. If something slake the leticia and it does not eat the miquela then the miquela is not lewd. If something slake the miquela and it is vinegary then the miquela slake the leticia. If the miquela does not eat the leticia then the miquela does not need the leticia. All pretorian things are vinegary. If something slake the leticia then it slake the miquela. If something is vinegary and it sloganeer the leticia then the leticia slake the miquela. The miquela is not swish.", "logic": "\nContested(miquela)\nPretorian(miquela)\nSloganeer(miquela, leticia)\nSwish(leticia)\nPretorian(leticia)\nSlake(leticia, miquela)\nSloganeer(leticia, miquela)\nforall x (Slake(x, leticia) and not Stir(x, miquela) -> not Lewd(miquela))\nforall x (Slake(x, miquela) and Vinegary(x) -> Slake(miquela, leticia))\nnot Stir(miquela, leticia) -> not Slake(miquela, leticia)\nforall x (Pretorian(x) -> Vinegary(x))\nforall x (Slake(x, leticia) -> Slake(x, miquela))\nforall x (Vinegary(x) and Sloganeer(x, leticia) -> Slake(leticia, miquela))\n\nnot Swish(miquela)\n\nnot Swish(miquela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The jan is disjointed. The jan is sumerian. The jan drill the wendi. The wendi is simulated. The wendi is sumerian. The wendi fret the jan. The wendi drill the jan. If something fret the wendi and it does not eat the jan then the jan is not fistulous. If something fret the jan and it is eupneic then the jan fret the wendi. If the jan does not eat the wendi then the jan does not need the wendi. All sumerian things are eupneic. If something fret the wendi then it fret the jan. If something is eupneic and it drill the wendi then the wendi fret the jan. The wendi twirl the jan.", "logic": "\nDisjointed(jan)\nSumerian(jan)\nDrill(jan, wendi)\nSimulated(wendi)\nSumerian(wendi)\nFret(wendi, jan)\nDrill(wendi, jan)\nforall x (Fret(x, wendi) and not Twirl(x, jan) -> not Fistulous(jan))\nforall x (Fret(x, jan) and Eupneic(x) -> Fret(jan, wendi))\nnot Twirl(jan, wendi) -> not Fret(jan, wendi)\nforall x (Sumerian(x) -> Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Fret(x, wendi) -> Fret(x, jan))\nforall x (Eupneic(x) and Drill(x, wendi) -> Fret(wendi, jan))\n\nTwirl(wendi, jan)\n\nTwirl(wendi, jan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The alejandra is unshakable. The alejandra is uncreased. The alejandra quetch the tonie. The tonie is heretical. The tonie is uncreased. The tonie concrete the alejandra. The tonie quetch the alejandra. If something concrete the tonie and it does not eat the alejandra then the alejandra is not pugnacious. If something concrete the alejandra and it is achaean then the alejandra concrete the tonie. If the alejandra does not eat the tonie then the alejandra does not need the tonie. All uncreased things are achaean. If something concrete the tonie then it concrete the alejandra. If something is achaean and it quetch the tonie then the tonie concrete the alejandra. The alejandra does not visit the alejandra.", "logic": "\nUnshakable(alejandra)\nUncreased(alejandra)\nQuetch(alejandra, tonie)\nHeretical(tonie)\nUncreased(tonie)\nConcrete(tonie, alejandra)\nQuetch(tonie, alejandra)\nforall x (Concrete(x, tonie) and not Assign(x, alejandra) -> not Pugnacious(alejandra))\nforall x (Concrete(x, alejandra) and Achaean(x) -> Concrete(alejandra, tonie))\nnot Assign(alejandra, tonie) -> not Concrete(alejandra, tonie)\nforall x (Uncreased(x) -> Achaean(x))\nforall x (Concrete(x, tonie) -> Concrete(x, alejandra))\nforall x (Achaean(x) and Quetch(x, tonie) -> Concrete(tonie, alejandra))\n\nnot Quetch(alejandra, alejandra)\n\nnot Quetch(alejandra, alejandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The lucius is gushy. The lucius is beneficent. The lucius scurry the tim. The tim is direct. The tim is beneficent. The tim temper the lucius. The tim scurry the lucius. If something temper the tim and it does not eat the lucius then the lucius is not helpful. If something temper the lucius and it is prurient then the lucius temper the tim. If the lucius does not eat the tim then the lucius does not need the tim. All beneficent things are prurient. If something temper the tim then it temper the lucius. If something is prurient and it scurry the tim then the tim temper the lucius. The tim is gushy.", "logic": "\nGushy(lucius)\nBeneficent(lucius)\nScurry(lucius, tim)\nDirect(tim)\nBeneficent(tim)\nTemper(tim, lucius)\nScurry(tim, lucius)\nforall x (Temper(x, tim) and not Depute(x, lucius) -> not Helpful(lucius))\nforall x (Temper(x, lucius) and Prurient(x) -> Temper(lucius, tim))\nnot Depute(lucius, tim) -> not Temper(lucius, tim)\nforall x (Beneficent(x) -> Prurient(x))\nforall x (Temper(x, tim) -> Temper(x, lucius))\nforall x (Prurient(x) and Scurry(x, tim) -> Temper(tim, lucius))\n\nGushy(tim)\n\nGushy(tim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The rica is priestly. The rica is sacral. The rica compact the elissa. The elissa is august. The elissa is sacral. The elissa mineralize the rica. The elissa compact the rica. If something mineralize the elissa and it does not eat the rica then the rica is not treble. If something mineralize the rica and it is crannied then the rica mineralize the elissa. If the rica does not eat the elissa then the rica does not need the elissa. All sacral things are crannied. If something mineralize the elissa then it mineralize the rica. If something is crannied and it compact the elissa then the elissa mineralize the rica. The elissa is not treble.", "logic": "\nPriestly(rica)\nSacral(rica)\nCompact(rica, elissa)\nAugust(elissa)\nSacral(elissa)\nMineralize(elissa, rica)\nCompact(elissa, rica)\nforall x (Mineralize(x, elissa) and not Diagnose(x, rica) -> not Treble(rica))\nforall x (Mineralize(x, rica) and Crannied(x) -> Mineralize(rica, elissa))\nnot Diagnose(rica, elissa) -> not Mineralize(rica, elissa)\nforall x (Sacral(x) -> Crannied(x))\nforall x (Mineralize(x, elissa) -> Mineralize(x, rica))\nforall x (Crannied(x) and Compact(x, elissa) -> Mineralize(elissa, rica))\n\nnot Treble(elissa)\n\nnot Treble(elissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The jackie is tearaway. The jackie is incendiary. The jackie weep the chelton. The chelton is glamorous. The chelton is incendiary. The chelton overstep the jackie. The chelton weep the jackie. If something overstep the chelton and it does not eat the jackie then the jackie is not edgy. If something overstep the jackie and it is catarrhal then the jackie overstep the chelton. If the jackie does not eat the chelton then the jackie does not need the chelton. All incendiary things are catarrhal. If something overstep the chelton then it overstep the jackie. If something is catarrhal and it weep the chelton then the chelton overstep the jackie. The chelton tonsure the chelton.", "logic": "\nTearaway(jackie)\nIncendiary(jackie)\nWeep(jackie, chelton)\nGlamorous(chelton)\nIncendiary(chelton)\nOverstep(chelton, jackie)\nWeep(chelton, jackie)\nforall x (Overstep(x, chelton) and not Tonsure(x, jackie) -> not Edgy(jackie))\nforall x (Overstep(x, jackie) and Catarrhal(x) -> Overstep(jackie, chelton))\nnot Tonsure(jackie, chelton) -> not Overstep(jackie, chelton)\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> Catarrhal(x))\nforall x (Overstep(x, chelton) -> Overstep(x, jackie))\nforall x (Catarrhal(x) and Weep(x, chelton) -> Overstep(chelton, jackie))\n\nTonsure(chelton, chelton)\n\nTonsure(chelton, chelton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The ike is cheating. The ike is hostile. The ike squint the rosalia. The rosalia is braky. The rosalia is hostile. The rosalia lighten the ike. The rosalia squint the ike. If something lighten the rosalia and it does not eat the ike then the ike is not blocked. If something lighten the ike and it is ambrosian then the ike lighten the rosalia. If the ike does not eat the rosalia then the ike does not need the rosalia. All hostile things are ambrosian. If something lighten the rosalia then it lighten the ike. If something is ambrosian and it squint the rosalia then the rosalia lighten the ike. The rosalia does not visit the rosalia.", "logic": "\nCheating(ike)\nHostile(ike)\nSquint(ike, rosalia)\nBraky(rosalia)\nHostile(rosalia)\nLighten(rosalia, ike)\nSquint(rosalia, ike)\nforall x (Lighten(x, rosalia) and not Junk(x, ike) -> not Blocked(ike))\nforall x (Lighten(x, ike) and Ambrosian(x) -> Lighten(ike, rosalia))\nnot Junk(ike, rosalia) -> not Lighten(ike, rosalia)\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Lighten(x, rosalia) -> Lighten(x, ike))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) and Squint(x, rosalia) -> Lighten(rosalia, ike))\n\nnot Squint(rosalia, rosalia)\n\nnot Squint(rosalia, rosalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "The lonee is acanthotic. The lonee is concealing. The lonee resorb the vachel. The vachel is intimate. The vachel is concealing. The vachel syllogise the lonee. The vachel resorb the lonee. If something syllogise the vachel and it does not eat the lonee then the lonee is not hunched. If something syllogise the lonee and it is enchanting then the lonee syllogise the vachel. If the lonee does not eat the vachel then the lonee does not need the vachel. All concealing things are enchanting. If something syllogise the vachel then it syllogise the lonee. If something is enchanting and it resorb the vachel then the vachel syllogise the lonee. The lonee is hunched.", "logic": "\nAcanthotic(lonee)\nConcealing(lonee)\nResorb(lonee, vachel)\nIntimate(vachel)\nConcealing(vachel)\nSyllogise(vachel, lonee)\nResorb(vachel, lonee)\nforall x (Syllogise(x, vachel) and not Misdo(x, lonee) -> not Hunched(lonee))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, lonee) and Enchanting(x) -> Syllogise(lonee, vachel))\nnot Misdo(lonee, vachel) -> not Syllogise(lonee, vachel)\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Enchanting(x))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, vachel) -> Syllogise(x, lonee))\nforall x (Enchanting(x) and Resorb(x, vachel) -> Syllogise(vachel, lonee))\n\nHunched(lonee)\n\nHunched(lonee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-704"} {"premises": "Haywood is unfitting. Haywood is greater. Roni is collegiate. Roni is subscript. Roni is eastmost. Roni is backstairs. Sapphira is unfitting. Sapphira is greater. Sapphira is collegiate. Sapphira is subscript. Sapphira is backstairs. Sapphira is furred. Rene is unfitting. Rene is greater. Rene is collegiate. All unfitting things are eastmost. If something is eastmost then it is collegiate. All eastmost, collegiate things are furred. Haywood is greater.", "logic": "\nUnfitting(haywood)\nGreater(haywood)\nCollegiate(roni)\nSubscript(roni)\nEastmost(roni)\nBackstairs(roni)\nUnfitting(sapphira)\nGreater(sapphira)\nCollegiate(sapphira)\nSubscript(sapphira)\nBackstairs(sapphira)\nFurred(sapphira)\nUnfitting(rene)\nGreater(rene)\nCollegiate(rene)\nforall x (Unfitting(x) -> Eastmost(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Collegiate(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) and Collegiate(x) -> Furred(x))\n\nGreater(haywood)\n\ntherefore Greater(haywood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Nydia is axile. Nydia is gooey. Silvano is spondaic. Silvano is aforesaid. Silvano is wealthy. Silvano is hatched. Netta is axile. Netta is gooey. Netta is spondaic. Netta is aforesaid. Netta is hatched. Netta is aetiologic. Virgilio is axile. Virgilio is gooey. Virgilio is spondaic. All axile things are wealthy. If something is wealthy then it is spondaic. All wealthy, spondaic things are aetiologic. Virgilio is not spondaic.", "logic": "\nAxile(nydia)\nGooey(nydia)\nSpondaic(silvano)\nAforesaid(silvano)\nWealthy(silvano)\nHatched(silvano)\nAxile(netta)\nGooey(netta)\nSpondaic(netta)\nAforesaid(netta)\nHatched(netta)\nAetiologic(netta)\nAxile(virgilio)\nGooey(virgilio)\nSpondaic(virgilio)\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Wealthy(x))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) -> Spondaic(x))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) and Spondaic(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\n\nnot Spondaic(virgilio)\n\ntherefore Spondaic(virgilio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Tudor is addlepated. Tudor is chaldaean. Derrin is millennian. Derrin is mesolithic. Derrin is blest. Derrin is extralegal. Mattias is addlepated. Mattias is chaldaean. Mattias is millennian. Mattias is mesolithic. Mattias is extralegal. Mattias is hypodermic. Priscella is addlepated. Priscella is chaldaean. Priscella is millennian. All addlepated things are blest. If something is blest then it is millennian. All blest, millennian things are hypodermic. Priscella is blest.", "logic": "\nAddlepated(tudor)\nChaldaean(tudor)\nMillennian(derrin)\nMesolithic(derrin)\nBlest(derrin)\nExtralegal(derrin)\nAddlepated(mattias)\nChaldaean(mattias)\nMillennian(mattias)\nMesolithic(mattias)\nExtralegal(mattias)\nHypodermic(mattias)\nAddlepated(priscella)\nChaldaean(priscella)\nMillennian(priscella)\nforall x (Addlepated(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Blest(x) -> Millennian(x))\nforall x (Blest(x) and Millennian(x) -> Hypodermic(x))\n\nBlest(priscella)\n\nAddlepated(priscella) and forall x (Addlepated(x) -> Blest(x)) -> therefore Blest(priscella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Andria is queer. Andria is keen. Odell is sanctioned. Odell is troublous. Odell is square. Odell is dastardly. Elric is queer. Elric is keen. Elric is sanctioned. Elric is troublous. Elric is dastardly. Elric is leafed. Ernesto is queer. Ernesto is keen. Ernesto is sanctioned. All queer things are square. If something is square then it is sanctioned. All square, sanctioned things are leafed. Elric is not square.", "logic": "\nQueer(andria)\nKeen(andria)\nSanctioned(odell)\nTroublous(odell)\nSquare(odell)\nDastardly(odell)\nQueer(elric)\nKeen(elric)\nSanctioned(elric)\nTroublous(elric)\nDastardly(elric)\nLeafed(elric)\nQueer(ernesto)\nKeen(ernesto)\nSanctioned(ernesto)\nforall x (Queer(x) -> Square(x))\nforall x (Square(x) -> Sanctioned(x))\nforall x (Square(x) and Sanctioned(x) -> Leafed(x))\n\nnot Square(elric)\n\nQueer(elric) and forall x (Queer(x) -> Square(x)) -> therefore Square(elric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Apostolos is aggressive. Apostolos is increased. Nara is quizzical. Nara is savoury. Nara is unuttered. Nara is scrofulous. Carissa is aggressive. Carissa is increased. Carissa is quizzical. Carissa is savoury. Carissa is scrofulous. Carissa is taciturn. Trixie is aggressive. Trixie is increased. Trixie is quizzical. All aggressive things are unuttered. If something is unuttered then it is quizzical. All unuttered, quizzical things are taciturn. Trixie is taciturn.", "logic": "\nAggressive(apostolos)\nIncreased(apostolos)\nQuizzical(nara)\nSavoury(nara)\nUnuttered(nara)\nScrofulous(nara)\nAggressive(carissa)\nIncreased(carissa)\nQuizzical(carissa)\nSavoury(carissa)\nScrofulous(carissa)\nTaciturn(carissa)\nAggressive(trixie)\nIncreased(trixie)\nQuizzical(trixie)\nforall x (Aggressive(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) -> Quizzical(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) and Quizzical(x) -> Taciturn(x))\n\nTaciturn(trixie)\n\nAggressive(trixie) and forall x (Aggressive(x) -> Unuttered(x)) -> therefore Unuttered(trixie) Unuttered(trixie) and Quizzical(trixie) and forall x (Unuttered(x) and Quizzical(x) -> Taciturn(x)) -> therefore Taciturn(trixie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Elene is elevated. Elene is ratified. Tabbatha is centroidal. Tabbatha is algoid. Tabbatha is greenhouse. Tabbatha is sonsie. Ketty is elevated. Ketty is ratified. Ketty is centroidal. Ketty is algoid. Ketty is sonsie. Ketty is blighted. Taylor is elevated. Taylor is ratified. Taylor is centroidal. All elevated things are greenhouse. If something is greenhouse then it is centroidal. All greenhouse, centroidal things are blighted. Taylor is not blighted.", "logic": "\nElevated(elene)\nRatified(elene)\nCentroidal(tabbatha)\nAlgoid(tabbatha)\nGreenhouse(tabbatha)\nSonsie(tabbatha)\nElevated(ketty)\nRatified(ketty)\nCentroidal(ketty)\nAlgoid(ketty)\nSonsie(ketty)\nBlighted(ketty)\nElevated(taylor)\nRatified(taylor)\nCentroidal(taylor)\nforall x (Elevated(x) -> Greenhouse(x))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) -> Centroidal(x))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) and Centroidal(x) -> Blighted(x))\n\nnot Blighted(taylor)\n\nElevated(taylor) and forall x (Elevated(x) -> Greenhouse(x)) -> therefore Greenhouse(taylor) Greenhouse(taylor) and Centroidal(taylor) and forall x (Greenhouse(x) and Centroidal(x) -> Blighted(x)) -> therefore Blighted(taylor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Audi is balsamy. Audi is recondite. Amberly is afflicted. Amberly is bicyclic. Amberly is antimonial. Amberly is blase. Windy is balsamy. Windy is recondite. Windy is afflicted. Windy is bicyclic. Windy is blase. Windy is sterile. Nedda is balsamy. Nedda is recondite. Nedda is afflicted. All balsamy things are antimonial. If something is antimonial then it is afflicted. All antimonial, afflicted things are sterile. Audi is sterile.", "logic": "\nBalsamy(audi)\nRecondite(audi)\nAfflicted(amberly)\nBicyclic(amberly)\nAntimonial(amberly)\nBlase(amberly)\nBalsamy(windy)\nRecondite(windy)\nAfflicted(windy)\nBicyclic(windy)\nBlase(windy)\nSterile(windy)\nBalsamy(nedda)\nRecondite(nedda)\nAfflicted(nedda)\nforall x (Balsamy(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) and Afflicted(x) -> Sterile(x))\n\nSterile(audi)\n\nBalsamy(audi) and forall x (Balsamy(x) -> Antimonial(x)) -> therefore Antimonial(audi) Balsamy(audi) and forall x (Balsamy(x) -> Antimonial(x)) -> therefore Antimonial(audi) Antimonial(audi) and forall x (Antimonial(x) -> Afflicted(x)) -> therefore Afflicted(audi) Antimonial(audi) and Afflicted(audi) and forall x (Antimonial(x) and Afflicted(x) -> Sterile(x)) -> therefore Sterile(audi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Candis is terrific. Candis is familiar. Marget is attic. Marget is maverick. Marget is pale. Marget is whiny. Jere is terrific. Jere is familiar. Jere is attic. Jere is maverick. Jere is whiny. Jere is tardive. Keri is terrific. Keri is familiar. Keri is attic. All terrific things are pale. If something is pale then it is attic. All pale, attic things are tardive. Candis is not tardive.", "logic": "\nTerrific(candis)\nFamiliar(candis)\nAttic(marget)\nMaverick(marget)\nPale(marget)\nWhiny(marget)\nTerrific(jere)\nFamiliar(jere)\nAttic(jere)\nMaverick(jere)\nWhiny(jere)\nTardive(jere)\nTerrific(keri)\nFamiliar(keri)\nAttic(keri)\nforall x (Terrific(x) -> Pale(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) -> Attic(x))\nforall x (Pale(x) and Attic(x) -> Tardive(x))\n\nnot Tardive(candis)\n\nTerrific(candis) and forall x (Terrific(x) -> Pale(x)) -> therefore Pale(candis) Terrific(candis) and forall x (Terrific(x) -> Pale(x)) -> therefore Pale(candis) Pale(candis) and forall x (Pale(x) -> Attic(x)) -> therefore Attic(candis) Pale(candis) and Attic(candis) and forall x (Pale(x) and Attic(x) -> Tardive(x)) -> therefore Tardive(candis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Ingamar is eucaryotic. Ingamar is obliged. Alyce is faceted. Alyce is caruncular. Alyce is napped. Alyce is miasmal. Lockwood is eucaryotic. Lockwood is obliged. Lockwood is faceted. Lockwood is caruncular. Lockwood is miasmal. Lockwood is excrescent. Tildi is eucaryotic. Tildi is obliged. Tildi is faceted. All eucaryotic things are napped. If something is napped then it is faceted. All napped, faceted things are excrescent. Alyce is not eucaryotic.", "logic": "\nEucaryotic(ingamar)\nObliged(ingamar)\nFaceted(alyce)\nCaruncular(alyce)\nNapped(alyce)\nMiasmal(alyce)\nEucaryotic(lockwood)\nObliged(lockwood)\nFaceted(lockwood)\nCaruncular(lockwood)\nMiasmal(lockwood)\nExcrescent(lockwood)\nEucaryotic(tildi)\nObliged(tildi)\nFaceted(tildi)\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Napped(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) -> Faceted(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) and Faceted(x) -> Excrescent(x))\n\nnot Eucaryotic(alyce)\n\nnot Eucaryotic(alyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Shena is rear. Shena is antipodean. Rupert is quadratic. Rupert is jangly. Rupert is silky. Rupert is blunt. Tan is rear. Tan is antipodean. Tan is quadratic. Tan is jangly. Tan is blunt. Tan is powerless. Shawna is rear. Shawna is antipodean. Shawna is quadratic. All rear things are silky. If something is silky then it is quadratic. All silky, quadratic things are powerless. Shawna is blunt.", "logic": "\nRear(shena)\nAntipodean(shena)\nQuadratic(rupert)\nJangly(rupert)\nSilky(rupert)\nBlunt(rupert)\nRear(tan)\nAntipodean(tan)\nQuadratic(tan)\nJangly(tan)\nBlunt(tan)\nPowerless(tan)\nRear(shawna)\nAntipodean(shawna)\nQuadratic(shawna)\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Silky(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) and Quadratic(x) -> Powerless(x))\n\nBlunt(shawna)\n\nBlunt(shawna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Amalie is blown. Amalie is accessory. Judith is undogmatic. Judith is easygoing. Judith is treasured. Judith is joint. Kial is blown. Kial is accessory. Kial is undogmatic. Kial is easygoing. Kial is joint. Kial is oncologic. Carolee is blown. Carolee is accessory. Carolee is undogmatic. All blown things are treasured. If something is treasured then it is undogmatic. All treasured, undogmatic things are oncologic. Amalie is not joint.", "logic": "\nBlown(amalie)\nAccessory(amalie)\nUndogmatic(judith)\nEasygoing(judith)\nTreasured(judith)\nJoint(judith)\nBlown(kial)\nAccessory(kial)\nUndogmatic(kial)\nEasygoing(kial)\nJoint(kial)\nOncologic(kial)\nBlown(carolee)\nAccessory(carolee)\nUndogmatic(carolee)\nforall x (Blown(x) -> Treasured(x))\nforall x (Treasured(x) -> Undogmatic(x))\nforall x (Treasured(x) and Undogmatic(x) -> Oncologic(x))\n\nnot Joint(amalie)\n\nnot Joint(amalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Shell is guided. Shell is gallican. Shaughn is thwarted. Shaughn is uncanny. Shaughn is tiring. Shaughn is backmost. Carlen is guided. Carlen is gallican. Carlen is thwarted. Carlen is uncanny. Carlen is backmost. Carlen is homey. Faina is guided. Faina is gallican. Faina is thwarted. All guided things are tiring. If something is tiring then it is thwarted. All tiring, thwarted things are homey. Shaughn is gallican.", "logic": "\nGuided(shell)\nGallican(shell)\nThwarted(shaughn)\nUncanny(shaughn)\nTiring(shaughn)\nBackmost(shaughn)\nGuided(carlen)\nGallican(carlen)\nThwarted(carlen)\nUncanny(carlen)\nBackmost(carlen)\nHomey(carlen)\nGuided(faina)\nGallican(faina)\nThwarted(faina)\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Tiring(x))\nforall x (Tiring(x) -> Thwarted(x))\nforall x (Tiring(x) and Thwarted(x) -> Homey(x))\n\nGallican(shaughn)\n\nGallican(shaughn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Luanna is unavenged. Luanna is apheretic. Annetta is atrophic. Annetta is permeable. Annetta is cotyloid. Annetta is soaked. Jannelle is unavenged. Jannelle is apheretic. Jannelle is atrophic. Jannelle is permeable. Jannelle is soaked. Jannelle is unsown. Arlo is unavenged. Arlo is apheretic. Arlo is atrophic. All unavenged things are cotyloid. If something is cotyloid then it is atrophic. All cotyloid, atrophic things are unsown. Luanna is not permeable.", "logic": "\nUnavenged(luanna)\nApheretic(luanna)\nAtrophic(annetta)\nPermeable(annetta)\nCotyloid(annetta)\nSoaked(annetta)\nUnavenged(jannelle)\nApheretic(jannelle)\nAtrophic(jannelle)\nPermeable(jannelle)\nSoaked(jannelle)\nUnsown(jannelle)\nUnavenged(arlo)\nApheretic(arlo)\nAtrophic(arlo)\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> Cotyloid(x))\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) -> Atrophic(x))\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) and Atrophic(x) -> Unsown(x))\n\nnot Permeable(luanna)\n\nnot Permeable(luanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "Melodie is under. Melodie is neural. Meriel is eugenic. Meriel is roseate. Meriel is pushful. Meriel is mnemonic. Dinah is under. Dinah is neural. Dinah is eugenic. Dinah is roseate. Dinah is mnemonic. Dinah is cubital. Annadiana is under. Annadiana is neural. Annadiana is eugenic. All under things are pushful. If something is pushful then it is eugenic. All pushful, eugenic things are cubital. Annadiana is roseate.", "logic": "\nUnder(melodie)\nNeural(melodie)\nEugenic(meriel)\nRoseate(meriel)\nPushful(meriel)\nMnemonic(meriel)\nUnder(dinah)\nNeural(dinah)\nEugenic(dinah)\nRoseate(dinah)\nMnemonic(dinah)\nCubital(dinah)\nUnder(annadiana)\nNeural(annadiana)\nEugenic(annadiana)\nforall x (Under(x) -> Pushful(x))\nforall x (Pushful(x) -> Eugenic(x))\nforall x (Pushful(x) and Eugenic(x) -> Cubital(x))\n\nRoseate(annadiana)\n\nRoseate(annadiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1489"} {"premises": "The calla does not need the alf. The alf flavour the calla. If someone is scented and they chase the calla then the calla flavour the alf. If the alf flavour the calla then the calla flavour the alf. If someone is unhearable and they chase the alf then they chase the calla. If someone is scented and unhearable then they like the alf. If someone flavour the alf then they are unhearable. If someone is invisible and they do not like the alf then they need the alf. If the calla promise the alf then the alf does not need the calla. If someone flavour the calla and the calla does not chase the alf then the alf does not need the calla. The calla does not need the alf.", "logic": "\nnot Aurify(calla, alf)\nFlavour(alf, calla)\nforall x (Scented(x) and Flavour(x, calla) -> Flavour(calla, alf))\nFlavour(alf, calla) -> Flavour(calla, alf)\nforall x (Unhearable(x) and Flavour(x, alf) -> Flavour(x, calla))\nforall x (Scented(x) and Unhearable(x) -> Promise(x, alf))\nforall x (Flavour(x, alf) -> Unhearable(x))\nforall x (Invisible(x) and not Promise(x, alf) -> Aurify(x, alf))\nPromise(calla, alf) -> not Aurify(alf, calla)\nforall x (Flavour(x, calla) and not Flavour(calla, alf) -> not Aurify(alf, calla))\n\nnot Aurify(calla, alf)\n\ntherefore not Aurify(calla, alf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The willem does not need the lanie. The lanie shark the willem. If someone is gumptious and they chase the willem then the willem shark the lanie. If the lanie shark the willem then the willem shark the lanie. If someone is inexplicit and they chase the lanie then they chase the willem. If someone is gumptious and inexplicit then they like the lanie. If someone shark the lanie then they are inexplicit. If someone is aperient and they do not like the lanie then they need the lanie. If the willem entangle the lanie then the lanie does not need the willem. If someone shark the willem and the willem does not chase the lanie then the lanie does not need the willem. The lanie does not chase the willem.", "logic": "\nnot Crust(willem, lanie)\nShark(lanie, willem)\nforall x (Gumptious(x) and Shark(x, willem) -> Shark(willem, lanie))\nShark(lanie, willem) -> Shark(willem, lanie)\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) and Shark(x, lanie) -> Shark(x, willem))\nforall x (Gumptious(x) and Inexplicit(x) -> Entangle(x, lanie))\nforall x (Shark(x, lanie) -> Inexplicit(x))\nforall x (Aperient(x) and not Entangle(x, lanie) -> Crust(x, lanie))\nEntangle(willem, lanie) -> not Crust(lanie, willem)\nforall x (Shark(x, willem) and not Shark(willem, lanie) -> not Crust(lanie, willem))\n\nnot Shark(lanie, willem)\n\ntherefore Shark(lanie, willem)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The dode does not need the nady. The nady eyewitness the dode. If someone is lacteal and they chase the dode then the dode eyewitness the nady. If the nady eyewitness the dode then the dode eyewitness the nady. If someone is marauding and they chase the nady then they chase the dode. If someone is lacteal and marauding then they like the nady. If someone eyewitness the nady then they are marauding. If someone is aeronautic and they do not like the nady then they need the nady. If the dode replay the nady then the nady does not need the dode. If someone eyewitness the dode and the dode does not chase the nady then the nady does not need the dode. The dode eyewitness the nady.", "logic": "\nnot Convalesce(dode, nady)\nEyewitness(nady, dode)\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Eyewitness(x, dode) -> Eyewitness(dode, nady))\nEyewitness(nady, dode) -> Eyewitness(dode, nady)\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Eyewitness(x, nady) -> Eyewitness(x, dode))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Marauding(x) -> Replay(x, nady))\nforall x (Eyewitness(x, nady) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Aeronautic(x) and not Replay(x, nady) -> Convalesce(x, nady))\nReplay(dode, nady) -> not Convalesce(nady, dode)\nforall x (Eyewitness(x, dode) and not Eyewitness(dode, nady) -> not Convalesce(nady, dode))\n\nEyewitness(dode, nady)\n\nEyewitness(nady, dode) and Eyewitness(nady, dode) -> Eyewitness(dode, nady) -> therefore Eyewitness(dode, nady)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The katalin does not need the brendan. The brendan flub the katalin. If someone is wealthy and they chase the katalin then the katalin flub the brendan. If the brendan flub the katalin then the katalin flub the brendan. If someone is prognostic and they chase the brendan then they chase the katalin. If someone is wealthy and prognostic then they like the brendan. If someone flub the brendan then they are prognostic. If someone is pietistic and they do not like the brendan then they need the brendan. If the katalin metallize the brendan then the brendan does not need the katalin. If someone flub the katalin and the katalin does not chase the brendan then the brendan does not need the katalin. The katalin does not chase the brendan.", "logic": "\nnot Bechance(katalin, brendan)\nFlub(brendan, katalin)\nforall x (Wealthy(x) and Flub(x, katalin) -> Flub(katalin, brendan))\nFlub(brendan, katalin) -> Flub(katalin, brendan)\nforall x (Prognostic(x) and Flub(x, brendan) -> Flub(x, katalin))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) and Prognostic(x) -> Metallize(x, brendan))\nforall x (Flub(x, brendan) -> Prognostic(x))\nforall x (Pietistic(x) and not Metallize(x, brendan) -> Bechance(x, brendan))\nMetallize(katalin, brendan) -> not Bechance(brendan, katalin)\nforall x (Flub(x, katalin) and not Flub(katalin, brendan) -> not Bechance(brendan, katalin))\n\nnot Flub(katalin, brendan)\n\nFlub(brendan, katalin) and Flub(brendan, katalin) -> Flub(katalin, brendan) -> therefore Flub(katalin, brendan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The shay does not need the charleen. The charleen labour the shay. If someone is yeastlike and they chase the shay then the shay labour the charleen. If the charleen labour the shay then the shay labour the charleen. If someone is expected and they chase the charleen then they chase the shay. If someone is yeastlike and expected then they like the charleen. If someone labour the charleen then they are expected. If someone is gainly and they do not like the charleen then they need the charleen. If the shay unitise the charleen then the charleen does not need the shay. If someone labour the shay and the shay does not chase the charleen then the charleen does not need the shay. The shay is expected.", "logic": "\nnot Splosh(shay, charleen)\nLabour(charleen, shay)\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) and Labour(x, shay) -> Labour(shay, charleen))\nLabour(charleen, shay) -> Labour(shay, charleen)\nforall x (Expected(x) and Labour(x, charleen) -> Labour(x, shay))\nforall x (Yeastlike(x) and Expected(x) -> Unitise(x, charleen))\nforall x (Labour(x, charleen) -> Expected(x))\nforall x (Gainly(x) and not Unitise(x, charleen) -> Splosh(x, charleen))\nUnitise(shay, charleen) -> not Splosh(charleen, shay)\nforall x (Labour(x, shay) and not Labour(shay, charleen) -> not Splosh(charleen, shay))\n\nExpected(shay)\n\nLabour(charleen, shay) and Labour(charleen, shay) -> Labour(shay, charleen) -> therefore Labour(shay, charleen) Labour(shay, charleen) and forall x (Labour(x, charleen) -> Expected(x)) -> therefore Expected(shay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The win does not need the lilias. The lilias baffle the win. If someone is reviving and they chase the win then the win baffle the lilias. If the lilias baffle the win then the win baffle the lilias. If someone is delighted and they chase the lilias then they chase the win. If someone is reviving and delighted then they like the lilias. If someone baffle the lilias then they are delighted. If someone is equal and they do not like the lilias then they need the lilias. If the win seduce the lilias then the lilias does not need the win. If someone baffle the win and the win does not chase the lilias then the lilias does not need the win. The win is not delighted.", "logic": "\nnot Colligate(win, lilias)\nBaffle(lilias, win)\nforall x (Reviving(x) and Baffle(x, win) -> Baffle(win, lilias))\nBaffle(lilias, win) -> Baffle(win, lilias)\nforall x (Delighted(x) and Baffle(x, lilias) -> Baffle(x, win))\nforall x (Reviving(x) and Delighted(x) -> Seduce(x, lilias))\nforall x (Baffle(x, lilias) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Equal(x) and not Seduce(x, lilias) -> Colligate(x, lilias))\nSeduce(win, lilias) -> not Colligate(lilias, win)\nforall x (Baffle(x, win) and not Baffle(win, lilias) -> not Colligate(lilias, win))\n\nnot Delighted(win)\n\nBaffle(lilias, win) and Baffle(lilias, win) -> Baffle(win, lilias) -> therefore Baffle(win, lilias) Baffle(win, lilias) and forall x (Baffle(x, lilias) -> Delighted(x)) -> therefore Delighted(win)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The shurlock does not need the reilly. The reilly trouble the shurlock. If someone is schismatic and they chase the shurlock then the shurlock trouble the reilly. If the reilly trouble the shurlock then the shurlock trouble the reilly. If someone is gummy and they chase the reilly then they chase the shurlock. If someone is schismatic and gummy then they like the reilly. If someone trouble the reilly then they are gummy. If someone is nonslip and they do not like the reilly then they need the reilly. If the shurlock function the reilly then the reilly does not need the shurlock. If someone trouble the shurlock and the shurlock does not chase the reilly then the reilly does not need the shurlock. The shurlock trouble the shurlock.", "logic": "\nnot Fake(shurlock, reilly)\nTrouble(reilly, shurlock)\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and Trouble(x, shurlock) -> Trouble(shurlock, reilly))\nTrouble(reilly, shurlock) -> Trouble(shurlock, reilly)\nforall x (Gummy(x) and Trouble(x, reilly) -> Trouble(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and Gummy(x) -> Function(x, reilly))\nforall x (Trouble(x, reilly) -> Gummy(x))\nforall x (Nonslip(x) and not Function(x, reilly) -> Fake(x, reilly))\nFunction(shurlock, reilly) -> not Fake(reilly, shurlock)\nforall x (Trouble(x, shurlock) and not Trouble(shurlock, reilly) -> not Fake(reilly, shurlock))\n\nTrouble(shurlock, shurlock)\n\nTrouble(reilly, shurlock) and Trouble(reilly, shurlock) -> Trouble(shurlock, reilly) -> therefore Trouble(shurlock, reilly) Trouble(shurlock, reilly) and forall x (Trouble(x, reilly) -> Gummy(x)) -> therefore Gummy(shurlock) Trouble(reilly, shurlock) and Trouble(reilly, shurlock) -> Trouble(shurlock, reilly) -> therefore Trouble(shurlock, reilly) Gummy(shurlock) and Trouble(shurlock, reilly) and forall x (Gummy(x) and Trouble(x, reilly) -> Trouble(x, shurlock)) -> therefore Trouble(shurlock, shurlock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The imojean does not need the hannis. The hannis subtilise the imojean. If someone is unspaced and they chase the imojean then the imojean subtilise the hannis. If the hannis subtilise the imojean then the imojean subtilise the hannis. If someone is blemished and they chase the hannis then they chase the imojean. If someone is unspaced and blemished then they like the hannis. If someone subtilise the hannis then they are blemished. If someone is weakly and they do not like the hannis then they need the hannis. If the imojean stake the hannis then the hannis does not need the imojean. If someone subtilise the imojean and the imojean does not chase the hannis then the hannis does not need the imojean. The imojean does not chase the imojean.", "logic": "\nnot Leak(imojean, hannis)\nSubtilise(hannis, imojean)\nforall x (Unspaced(x) and Subtilise(x, imojean) -> Subtilise(imojean, hannis))\nSubtilise(hannis, imojean) -> Subtilise(imojean, hannis)\nforall x (Blemished(x) and Subtilise(x, hannis) -> Subtilise(x, imojean))\nforall x (Unspaced(x) and Blemished(x) -> Stake(x, hannis))\nforall x (Subtilise(x, hannis) -> Blemished(x))\nforall x (Weakly(x) and not Stake(x, hannis) -> Leak(x, hannis))\nStake(imojean, hannis) -> not Leak(hannis, imojean)\nforall x (Subtilise(x, imojean) and not Subtilise(imojean, hannis) -> not Leak(hannis, imojean))\n\nnot Subtilise(imojean, imojean)\n\nSubtilise(hannis, imojean) and Subtilise(hannis, imojean) -> Subtilise(imojean, hannis) -> therefore Subtilise(imojean, hannis) Subtilise(imojean, hannis) and forall x (Subtilise(x, hannis) -> Blemished(x)) -> therefore Blemished(imojean) Subtilise(hannis, imojean) and Subtilise(hannis, imojean) -> Subtilise(imojean, hannis) -> therefore Subtilise(imojean, hannis) Blemished(imojean) and Subtilise(imojean, hannis) and forall x (Blemished(x) and Subtilise(x, hannis) -> Subtilise(x, imojean)) -> therefore Subtilise(imojean, imojean)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The karyl does not need the madelaine. The madelaine hulk the karyl. If someone is apogamic and they chase the karyl then the karyl hulk the madelaine. If the madelaine hulk the karyl then the karyl hulk the madelaine. If someone is abeyant and they chase the madelaine then they chase the karyl. If someone is apogamic and abeyant then they like the madelaine. If someone hulk the madelaine then they are abeyant. If someone is inexorable and they do not like the madelaine then they need the madelaine. If the karyl preheat the madelaine then the madelaine does not need the karyl. If someone hulk the karyl and the karyl does not chase the madelaine then the madelaine does not need the karyl. The madelaine does not need the madelaine.", "logic": "\nnot Snuff(karyl, madelaine)\nHulk(madelaine, karyl)\nforall x (Apogamic(x) and Hulk(x, karyl) -> Hulk(karyl, madelaine))\nHulk(madelaine, karyl) -> Hulk(karyl, madelaine)\nforall x (Abeyant(x) and Hulk(x, madelaine) -> Hulk(x, karyl))\nforall x (Apogamic(x) and Abeyant(x) -> Preheat(x, madelaine))\nforall x (Hulk(x, madelaine) -> Abeyant(x))\nforall x (Inexorable(x) and not Preheat(x, madelaine) -> Snuff(x, madelaine))\nPreheat(karyl, madelaine) -> not Snuff(madelaine, karyl)\nforall x (Hulk(x, karyl) and not Hulk(karyl, madelaine) -> not Snuff(madelaine, karyl))\n\nnot Snuff(madelaine, madelaine)\n\nforall x (Inexorable(x) and not Preheat(x, madelaine) -> Snuff(x, madelaine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The idell does not need the rudie. The rudie commix the idell. If someone is enviable and they chase the idell then the idell commix the rudie. If the rudie commix the idell then the idell commix the rudie. If someone is unwearied and they chase the rudie then they chase the idell. If someone is enviable and unwearied then they like the rudie. If someone commix the rudie then they are unwearied. If someone is oriented and they do not like the rudie then they need the rudie. If the idell drool the rudie then the rudie does not need the idell. If someone commix the idell and the idell does not chase the rudie then the rudie does not need the idell. The idell drool the rudie.", "logic": "\nnot Confirm(idell, rudie)\nCommix(rudie, idell)\nforall x (Enviable(x) and Commix(x, idell) -> Commix(idell, rudie))\nCommix(rudie, idell) -> Commix(idell, rudie)\nforall x (Unwearied(x) and Commix(x, rudie) -> Commix(x, idell))\nforall x (Enviable(x) and Unwearied(x) -> Drool(x, rudie))\nforall x (Commix(x, rudie) -> Unwearied(x))\nforall x (Oriented(x) and not Drool(x, rudie) -> Confirm(x, rudie))\nDrool(idell, rudie) -> not Confirm(rudie, idell)\nforall x (Commix(x, idell) and not Commix(idell, rudie) -> not Confirm(rudie, idell))\n\nDrool(idell, rudie)\n\nforall x (Enviable(x) and Unwearied(x) -> Drool(x, rudie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The kostas does not need the leonidas. The leonidas apostatize the kostas. If someone is neutered and they chase the kostas then the kostas apostatize the leonidas. If the leonidas apostatize the kostas then the kostas apostatize the leonidas. If someone is wilted and they chase the leonidas then they chase the kostas. If someone is neutered and wilted then they like the leonidas. If someone apostatize the leonidas then they are wilted. If someone is undue and they do not like the leonidas then they need the leonidas. If the kostas blanket the leonidas then the leonidas does not need the kostas. If someone apostatize the kostas and the kostas does not chase the leonidas then the leonidas does not need the kostas. The leonidas does not like the leonidas.", "logic": "\nnot Dodge(kostas, leonidas)\nApostatize(leonidas, kostas)\nforall x (Neutered(x) and Apostatize(x, kostas) -> Apostatize(kostas, leonidas))\nApostatize(leonidas, kostas) -> Apostatize(kostas, leonidas)\nforall x (Wilted(x) and Apostatize(x, leonidas) -> Apostatize(x, kostas))\nforall x (Neutered(x) and Wilted(x) -> Blanket(x, leonidas))\nforall x (Apostatize(x, leonidas) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Undue(x) and not Blanket(x, leonidas) -> Dodge(x, leonidas))\nBlanket(kostas, leonidas) -> not Dodge(leonidas, kostas)\nforall x (Apostatize(x, kostas) and not Apostatize(kostas, leonidas) -> not Dodge(leonidas, kostas))\n\nnot Blanket(leonidas, leonidas)\n\nforall x (Neutered(x) and Wilted(x) -> Blanket(x, leonidas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The tremain does not need the rolfe. The rolfe frisk the tremain. If someone is rustproof and they chase the tremain then the tremain frisk the rolfe. If the rolfe frisk the tremain then the tremain frisk the rolfe. If someone is advanced and they chase the rolfe then they chase the tremain. If someone is rustproof and advanced then they like the rolfe. If someone frisk the rolfe then they are advanced. If someone is farther and they do not like the rolfe then they need the rolfe. If the tremain cheer the rolfe then the rolfe does not need the tremain. If someone frisk the tremain and the tremain does not chase the rolfe then the rolfe does not need the tremain. The rolfe is advanced.", "logic": "\nnot Orbit(tremain, rolfe)\nFrisk(rolfe, tremain)\nforall x (Rustproof(x) and Frisk(x, tremain) -> Frisk(tremain, rolfe))\nFrisk(rolfe, tremain) -> Frisk(tremain, rolfe)\nforall x (Advanced(x) and Frisk(x, rolfe) -> Frisk(x, tremain))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) and Advanced(x) -> Cheer(x, rolfe))\nforall x (Frisk(x, rolfe) -> Advanced(x))\nforall x (Farther(x) and not Cheer(x, rolfe) -> Orbit(x, rolfe))\nCheer(tremain, rolfe) -> not Orbit(rolfe, tremain)\nforall x (Frisk(x, tremain) and not Frisk(tremain, rolfe) -> not Orbit(rolfe, tremain))\n\nAdvanced(rolfe)\n\nforall x (Frisk(x, rolfe) -> Advanced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The danyelle does not need the burke. The burke retrovert the danyelle. If someone is headless and they chase the danyelle then the danyelle retrovert the burke. If the burke retrovert the danyelle then the danyelle retrovert the burke. If someone is sissy and they chase the burke then they chase the danyelle. If someone is headless and sissy then they like the burke. If someone retrovert the burke then they are sissy. If someone is indistinct and they do not like the burke then they need the burke. If the danyelle summerize the burke then the burke does not need the danyelle. If someone retrovert the danyelle and the danyelle does not chase the burke then the burke does not need the danyelle. The burke is not kind.", "logic": "\nnot Beacon(danyelle, burke)\nRetrovert(burke, danyelle)\nforall x (Headless(x) and Retrovert(x, danyelle) -> Retrovert(danyelle, burke))\nRetrovert(burke, danyelle) -> Retrovert(danyelle, burke)\nforall x (Sissy(x) and Retrovert(x, burke) -> Retrovert(x, danyelle))\nforall x (Headless(x) and Sissy(x) -> Summerize(x, burke))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, burke) -> Sissy(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) and not Summerize(x, burke) -> Beacon(x, burke))\nSummerize(danyelle, burke) -> not Beacon(burke, danyelle)\nforall x (Retrovert(x, danyelle) and not Retrovert(danyelle, burke) -> not Beacon(burke, danyelle))\n\nnot Kind(burke)\n\nnot Kind(burke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The tessie does not need the quentin. The quentin exonerate the tessie. If someone is cypriot and they chase the tessie then the tessie exonerate the quentin. If the quentin exonerate the tessie then the tessie exonerate the quentin. If someone is sparkly and they chase the quentin then they chase the tessie. If someone is cypriot and sparkly then they like the quentin. If someone exonerate the quentin then they are sparkly. If someone is unwaxed and they do not like the quentin then they need the quentin. If the tessie typewrite the quentin then the quentin does not need the tessie. If someone exonerate the tessie and the tessie does not chase the quentin then the quentin does not need the tessie. The tessie is kind.", "logic": "\nnot Disband(tessie, quentin)\nExonerate(quentin, tessie)\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and Exonerate(x, tessie) -> Exonerate(tessie, quentin))\nExonerate(quentin, tessie) -> Exonerate(tessie, quentin)\nforall x (Sparkly(x) and Exonerate(x, quentin) -> Exonerate(x, tessie))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and Sparkly(x) -> Typewrite(x, quentin))\nforall x (Exonerate(x, quentin) -> Sparkly(x))\nforall x (Unwaxed(x) and not Typewrite(x, quentin) -> Disband(x, quentin))\nTypewrite(tessie, quentin) -> not Disband(quentin, tessie)\nforall x (Exonerate(x, tessie) and not Exonerate(tessie, quentin) -> not Disband(quentin, tessie))\n\nKind(tessie)\n\nKind(tessie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The donetta does not need the wes. The wes literalize the donetta. If someone is pentagonal and they chase the donetta then the donetta literalize the wes. If the wes literalize the donetta then the donetta literalize the wes. If someone is upcoming and they chase the wes then they chase the donetta. If someone is pentagonal and upcoming then they like the wes. If someone literalize the wes then they are upcoming. If someone is hygienic and they do not like the wes then they need the wes. If the donetta birr the wes then the wes does not need the donetta. If someone literalize the donetta and the donetta does not chase the wes then the wes does not need the donetta. The donetta does not like the donetta.", "logic": "\nnot Purport(donetta, wes)\nLiteralize(wes, donetta)\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) and Literalize(x, donetta) -> Literalize(donetta, wes))\nLiteralize(wes, donetta) -> Literalize(donetta, wes)\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Literalize(x, wes) -> Literalize(x, donetta))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) and Upcoming(x) -> Birr(x, wes))\nforall x (Literalize(x, wes) -> Upcoming(x))\nforall x (Hygienic(x) and not Birr(x, wes) -> Purport(x, wes))\nBirr(donetta, wes) -> not Purport(wes, donetta)\nforall x (Literalize(x, donetta) and not Literalize(donetta, wes) -> not Purport(wes, donetta))\n\nnot Birr(donetta, donetta)\n\nnot Birr(donetta, donetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "The hillard does not need the kraig. The kraig wade the hillard. If someone is semihard and they chase the hillard then the hillard wade the kraig. If the kraig wade the hillard then the hillard wade the kraig. If someone is lunar and they chase the kraig then they chase the hillard. If someone is semihard and lunar then they like the kraig. If someone wade the kraig then they are lunar. If someone is granted and they do not like the kraig then they need the kraig. If the hillard encrypt the kraig then the kraig does not need the hillard. If someone wade the hillard and the hillard does not chase the kraig then the kraig does not need the hillard. The hillard is semihard.", "logic": "\nnot Brandish(hillard, kraig)\nWade(kraig, hillard)\nforall x (Semihard(x) and Wade(x, hillard) -> Wade(hillard, kraig))\nWade(kraig, hillard) -> Wade(hillard, kraig)\nforall x (Lunar(x) and Wade(x, kraig) -> Wade(x, hillard))\nforall x (Semihard(x) and Lunar(x) -> Encrypt(x, kraig))\nforall x (Wade(x, kraig) -> Lunar(x))\nforall x (Granted(x) and not Encrypt(x, kraig) -> Brandish(x, kraig))\nEncrypt(hillard, kraig) -> not Brandish(kraig, hillard)\nforall x (Wade(x, hillard) and not Wade(hillard, kraig) -> not Brandish(kraig, hillard))\n\nSemihard(hillard)\n\nSemihard(hillard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Jeremy is twelve. Chevalier is harrowing. Rayshell is lustreless. If something is astatic and harrowing then it is twelve. White things are granitic. Jeremy is twelve.", "logic": "\nTwelve(jeremy)\nHarrowing(chevalier)\nLustreless(rayshell)\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Harrowing(x) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) -> Granitic(x))\n\nTwelve(jeremy)\n\ntherefore Twelve(jeremy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4724"} {"premises": "Velvet is assuring. Nero is seventy. Nigel is dimmed. If something is campy and seventy then it is assuring. White things are unleavened. Nigel is not dimmed.", "logic": "\nAssuring(velvet)\nSeventy(nero)\nDimmed(nigel)\nforall x (Campy(x) and Seventy(x) -> Assuring(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Unleavened(x))\n\nnot Dimmed(nigel)\n\ntherefore Dimmed(nigel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4724"} {"premises": "Sharline is cellulosid. Sharl is iodinating. Hastings is listed. If something is aurorean and iodinating then it is cellulosid. White things are rawboned. Hastings is not cellulosid.", "logic": "\nCellulosid(sharline)\nIodinating(sharl)\nListed(hastings)\nforall x (Aurorean(x) and Iodinating(x) -> Cellulosid(x))\nforall x (Aurorean(x) -> Rawboned(x))\n\nnot Cellulosid(hastings)\n\nforall x (Aurorean(x) and Iodinating(x) -> Cellulosid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4724"} {"premises": "Cameron is ammoniacal. Ajay is cobwebby. Almeta is milanese. If something is unsuasible and cobwebby then it is ammoniacal. White things are unimposing. Cameron is milanese.", "logic": "\nAmmoniacal(cameron)\nCobwebby(ajay)\nMilanese(almeta)\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) and Cobwebby(x) -> Ammoniacal(x))\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Unimposing(x))\n\nMilanese(cameron)\n\nMilanese(cameron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4724"} {"premises": "Sabina is butyric. Magda is thickened. Elwina is decent. If something is butyric and not unworkable then it is not thickened. If Sabina is direct then Sabina is butyric. Smart, unworkable things are decent. All decent, hygienical things are butyric. White things are equipoised. All butyric, thickened things are equipoised. All decent things are not hygienical. All decent things are direct. Sabina is butyric.", "logic": "\nButyric(sabina)\nThickened(magda)\nDecent(elwina)\nforall x (Butyric(x) and not Unworkable(x) -> not Thickened(x))\nDirect(sabina) -> Butyric(sabina)\nforall x (Equipoised(x) and Unworkable(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Butyric(x))\nforall x (Direct(x) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) and Thickened(x) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) -> not Hygienical(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) -> Direct(x))\n\nButyric(sabina)\n\ntherefore Butyric(sabina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Glenine is booked. Denice is supple. Rachel is capable. If something is booked and not brash then it is not supple. If Glenine is coordinate then Glenine is booked. Smart, brash things are capable. All capable, reluctant things are booked. White things are reflecting. All booked, supple things are reflecting. All capable things are not reluctant. All capable things are coordinate. Rachel is not capable.", "logic": "\nBooked(glenine)\nSupple(denice)\nCapable(rachel)\nforall x (Booked(x) and not Brash(x) -> not Supple(x))\nCoordinate(glenine) -> Booked(glenine)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Brash(x) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) and Reluctant(x) -> Booked(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Reflecting(x))\nforall x (Booked(x) and Supple(x) -> Reflecting(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) -> not Reluctant(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Coordinate(x))\n\nnot Capable(rachel)\n\ntherefore Capable(rachel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Rozelle is unwatchful. Ebony is spongy. Lynnett is calando. If something is unwatchful and not historic then it is not spongy. If Rozelle is masoretic then Rozelle is unwatchful. Smart, historic things are calando. All calando, sudorific things are unwatchful. White things are allopathic. All unwatchful, spongy things are allopathic. All calando things are not sudorific. All calando things are masoretic. Lynnett is not sudorific.", "logic": "\nUnwatchful(rozelle)\nSpongy(ebony)\nCalando(lynnett)\nforall x (Unwatchful(x) and not Historic(x) -> not Spongy(x))\nMasoretic(rozelle) -> Unwatchful(rozelle)\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Historic(x) -> Calando(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) and Sudorific(x) -> Unwatchful(x))\nforall x (Masoretic(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Unwatchful(x) and Spongy(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> not Sudorific(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Masoretic(x))\n\nnot Sudorific(lynnett)\n\nCalando(lynnett) and forall x (Calando(x) -> not Sudorific(x)) -> therefore not Sudorific(lynnett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Melloney is metabolic. Missie is spurting. Roarke is virginal. If something is metabolic and not spiderly then it is not spurting. If Melloney is hypnotic then Melloney is metabolic. Smart, spiderly things are virginal. All virginal, unwritten things are metabolic. White things are legendary. All metabolic, spurting things are legendary. All virginal things are not unwritten. All virginal things are hypnotic. Roarke is not hypnotic.", "logic": "\nMetabolic(melloney)\nSpurting(missie)\nVirginal(roarke)\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and not Spiderly(x) -> not Spurting(x))\nHypnotic(melloney) -> Metabolic(melloney)\nforall x (Legendary(x) and Spiderly(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) and Unwritten(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Legendary(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Spurting(x) -> Legendary(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> not Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\n\nnot Hypnotic(roarke)\n\nVirginal(roarke) and forall x (Virginal(x) -> Hypnotic(x)) -> therefore Hypnotic(roarke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Jillene is dietetical. Leif is sweetish. Sheeree is quickset. If something is dietetical and not reflexed then it is not sweetish. If Jillene is empathic then Jillene is dietetical. Smart, reflexed things are quickset. All quickset, myriad things are dietetical. White things are shaky. All dietetical, sweetish things are shaky. All quickset things are not myriad. All quickset things are empathic. Leif is not shaky.", "logic": "\nDietetical(jillene)\nSweetish(leif)\nQuickset(sheeree)\nforall x (Dietetical(x) and not Reflexed(x) -> not Sweetish(x))\nEmpathic(jillene) -> Dietetical(jillene)\nforall x (Shaky(x) and Reflexed(x) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Quickset(x) and Myriad(x) -> Dietetical(x))\nforall x (Empathic(x) -> Shaky(x))\nforall x (Dietetical(x) and Sweetish(x) -> Shaky(x))\nforall x (Quickset(x) -> not Myriad(x))\nforall x (Quickset(x) -> Empathic(x))\n\nnot Shaky(leif)\n\nforall x (Empathic(x) -> Shaky(x)) <- forall x (Quickset(x) -> Empathic(x)) <- forall x (Shaky(x) and Reflexed(x) -> Quickset(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Yehudi is thumping. Annmarie is bratty. Rube is foster. If something is thumping and not braised then it is not bratty. If Yehudi is american then Yehudi is thumping. Smart, braised things are foster. All foster, upfield things are thumping. White things are ceric. All thumping, bratty things are ceric. All foster things are not upfield. All foster things are american. Yehudi is american.", "logic": "\nThumping(yehudi)\nBratty(annmarie)\nFoster(rube)\nforall x (Thumping(x) and not Braised(x) -> not Bratty(x))\nAmerican(yehudi) -> Thumping(yehudi)\nforall x (Ceric(x) and Braised(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) and Upfield(x) -> Thumping(x))\nforall x (American(x) -> Ceric(x))\nforall x (Thumping(x) and Bratty(x) -> Ceric(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) -> not Upfield(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) -> American(x))\n\nAmerican(yehudi)\n\nforall x (Foster(x) -> American(x)) <- forall x (Ceric(x) and Braised(x) -> Foster(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Grier is miraculous. Auria is anguished. Crissy is observant. If something is miraculous and not anthropic then it is not anguished. If Grier is principal then Grier is miraculous. Smart, anthropic things are observant. All observant, through things are miraculous. White things are wily. All miraculous, anguished things are wily. All observant things are not through. All observant things are principal. Grier is not anguished.", "logic": "\nMiraculous(grier)\nAnguished(auria)\nObservant(crissy)\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and not Anthropic(x) -> not Anguished(x))\nPrincipal(grier) -> Miraculous(grier)\nforall x (Wily(x) and Anthropic(x) -> Observant(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) and Through(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nforall x (Principal(x) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and Anguished(x) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) -> not Through(x))\nforall x (Observant(x) -> Principal(x))\n\nnot Anguished(grier)\n\nnot Anguished(grier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Rudolfo is forced. Aleck is dutiful. Ham is riparian. If something is forced and not oblique then it is not dutiful. If Rudolfo is unnerving then Rudolfo is forced. Smart, oblique things are riparian. All riparian, nectarous things are forced. White things are corinthian. All forced, dutiful things are corinthian. All riparian things are not nectarous. All riparian things are unnerving. Aleck is nectarous.", "logic": "\nForced(rudolfo)\nDutiful(aleck)\nRiparian(ham)\nforall x (Forced(x) and not Oblique(x) -> not Dutiful(x))\nUnnerving(rudolfo) -> Forced(rudolfo)\nforall x (Corinthian(x) and Oblique(x) -> Riparian(x))\nforall x (Riparian(x) and Nectarous(x) -> Forced(x))\nforall x (Unnerving(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Forced(x) and Dutiful(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Riparian(x) -> not Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Riparian(x) -> Unnerving(x))\n\nNectarous(aleck)\n\nNectarous(aleck) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2643"} {"premises": "Moe is male. Moe is satiate. Moe is copesetic. Moe is amylaceous. Moe is sublunar. Moe is sufferable. Carlyle is male. Carlyle is satiate. Carlyle is amylaceous. Carlyle is sublunar. Carlyle is sufferable. Crystal is tidy. Crystal is copesetic. Crystal is sufferable. Giorgia is tidy. Giorgia is copesetic. All tidy, sufferable things are male. If something is sublunar then it is copesetic. All amylaceous things are tidy. If something is amylaceous then it is sublunar. If something is sufferable and copesetic then it is amylaceous. Red things are sufferable. Moe is satiate.", "logic": "\nMale(moe)\nSatiate(moe)\nCopesetic(moe)\nAmylaceous(moe)\nSublunar(moe)\nSufferable(moe)\nMale(carlyle)\nSatiate(carlyle)\nAmylaceous(carlyle)\nSublunar(carlyle)\nSufferable(carlyle)\nTidy(crystal)\nCopesetic(crystal)\nSufferable(crystal)\nTidy(giorgia)\nCopesetic(giorgia)\nforall x (Tidy(x) and Sufferable(x) -> Male(x))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) -> Tidy(x))\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Sufferable(x) and Copesetic(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Sufferable(x))\n\nSatiate(moe)\n\ntherefore Satiate(moe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Reena is dual. Reena is vitreous. Reena is bombastic. Reena is nontaxable. Reena is unflurried. Reena is infuriated. Marylynne is dual. Marylynne is vitreous. Marylynne is nontaxable. Marylynne is unflurried. Marylynne is infuriated. Quinton is climatic. Quinton is bombastic. Quinton is infuriated. Arthur is climatic. Arthur is bombastic. All climatic, infuriated things are dual. If something is unflurried then it is bombastic. All nontaxable things are climatic. If something is nontaxable then it is unflurried. If something is infuriated and bombastic then it is nontaxable. Red things are infuriated. Reena is not dual.", "logic": "\nDual(reena)\nVitreous(reena)\nBombastic(reena)\nNontaxable(reena)\nUnflurried(reena)\nInfuriated(reena)\nDual(marylynne)\nVitreous(marylynne)\nNontaxable(marylynne)\nUnflurried(marylynne)\nInfuriated(marylynne)\nClimatic(quinton)\nBombastic(quinton)\nInfuriated(quinton)\nClimatic(arthur)\nBombastic(arthur)\nforall x (Climatic(x) and Infuriated(x) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) -> Climatic(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) -> Unflurried(x))\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Bombastic(x) -> Nontaxable(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Infuriated(x))\n\nnot Dual(reena)\n\ntherefore Dual(reena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Laurene is stabilised. Laurene is worthy. Laurene is forgivable. Laurene is intolerant. Laurene is geared. Laurene is balsamy. Thorndike is stabilised. Thorndike is worthy. Thorndike is intolerant. Thorndike is geared. Thorndike is balsamy. Joyce is underhand. Joyce is forgivable. Joyce is balsamy. Shanie is underhand. Shanie is forgivable. All underhand, balsamy things are stabilised. If something is geared then it is forgivable. All intolerant things are underhand. If something is intolerant then it is geared. If something is balsamy and forgivable then it is intolerant. Red things are balsamy. Shanie is balsamy.", "logic": "\nStabilised(laurene)\nWorthy(laurene)\nForgivable(laurene)\nIntolerant(laurene)\nGeared(laurene)\nBalsamy(laurene)\nStabilised(thorndike)\nWorthy(thorndike)\nIntolerant(thorndike)\nGeared(thorndike)\nBalsamy(thorndike)\nUnderhand(joyce)\nForgivable(joyce)\nBalsamy(joyce)\nUnderhand(shanie)\nForgivable(shanie)\nforall x (Underhand(x) and Balsamy(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Geared(x) -> Forgivable(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Balsamy(x) and Forgivable(x) -> Intolerant(x))\nforall x (Forgivable(x) -> Balsamy(x))\n\nBalsamy(shanie)\n\nForgivable(shanie) and forall x (Forgivable(x) -> Balsamy(x)) -> therefore Balsamy(shanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Myranda is beguiling. Myranda is xxxii. Myranda is pleasant. Myranda is hindustani. Myranda is sericeous. Myranda is northerly. Phyllida is beguiling. Phyllida is xxxii. Phyllida is hindustani. Phyllida is sericeous. Phyllida is northerly. Hansel is snowy. Hansel is pleasant. Hansel is northerly. Alic is snowy. Alic is pleasant. All snowy, northerly things are beguiling. If something is sericeous then it is pleasant. All hindustani things are snowy. If something is hindustani then it is sericeous. If something is northerly and pleasant then it is hindustani. Red things are northerly. Alic is not northerly.", "logic": "\nBeguiling(myranda)\nXxxii(myranda)\nPleasant(myranda)\nHindustani(myranda)\nSericeous(myranda)\nNortherly(myranda)\nBeguiling(phyllida)\nXxxii(phyllida)\nHindustani(phyllida)\nSericeous(phyllida)\nNortherly(phyllida)\nSnowy(hansel)\nPleasant(hansel)\nNortherly(hansel)\nSnowy(alic)\nPleasant(alic)\nforall x (Snowy(x) and Northerly(x) -> Beguiling(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Pleasant(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) -> Snowy(x))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Northerly(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Hindustani(x))\nforall x (Pleasant(x) -> Northerly(x))\n\nnot Northerly(alic)\n\nPleasant(alic) and forall x (Pleasant(x) -> Northerly(x)) -> therefore Northerly(alic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Guinna is burnished. Guinna is weedless. Guinna is compulsory. Guinna is dripless. Guinna is medial. Guinna is nosohusial. Rog is burnished. Rog is weedless. Rog is dripless. Rog is medial. Rog is nosohusial. Henri is shamanist. Henri is compulsory. Henri is nosohusial. Kirbie is shamanist. Kirbie is compulsory. All shamanist, nosohusial things are burnished. If something is medial then it is compulsory. All dripless things are shamanist. If something is dripless then it is medial. If something is nosohusial and compulsory then it is dripless. Red things are nosohusial. Henri is medial.", "logic": "\nBurnished(guinna)\nWeedless(guinna)\nCompulsory(guinna)\nDripless(guinna)\nMedial(guinna)\nNosohusial(guinna)\nBurnished(rog)\nWeedless(rog)\nDripless(rog)\nMedial(rog)\nNosohusial(rog)\nShamanist(henri)\nCompulsory(henri)\nNosohusial(henri)\nShamanist(kirbie)\nCompulsory(kirbie)\nforall x (Shamanist(x) and Nosohusial(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Medial(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) and Compulsory(x) -> Dripless(x))\nforall x (Compulsory(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\n\nMedial(henri)\n\nNosohusial(henri) and Compulsory(henri) and forall x (Nosohusial(x) and Compulsory(x) -> Dripless(x)) -> therefore Dripless(henri) Dripless(henri) and forall x (Dripless(x) -> Medial(x)) -> therefore Medial(henri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Aloysius is clubbish. Aloysius is algonquin. Aloysius is forward. Aloysius is wrong. Aloysius is calcuttan. Aloysius is liturgical. Andrew is clubbish. Andrew is algonquin. Andrew is wrong. Andrew is calcuttan. Andrew is liturgical. Karlotta is catenulate. Karlotta is forward. Karlotta is liturgical. Stafford is catenulate. Stafford is forward. All catenulate, liturgical things are clubbish. If something is calcuttan then it is forward. All wrong things are catenulate. If something is wrong then it is calcuttan. If something is liturgical and forward then it is wrong. Red things are liturgical. Stafford is not wrong.", "logic": "\nClubbish(aloysius)\nAlgonquin(aloysius)\nForward(aloysius)\nWrong(aloysius)\nCalcuttan(aloysius)\nLiturgical(aloysius)\nClubbish(andrew)\nAlgonquin(andrew)\nWrong(andrew)\nCalcuttan(andrew)\nLiturgical(andrew)\nCatenulate(karlotta)\nForward(karlotta)\nLiturgical(karlotta)\nCatenulate(stafford)\nForward(stafford)\nforall x (Catenulate(x) and Liturgical(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) -> Forward(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Catenulate(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) and Forward(x) -> Wrong(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) -> Liturgical(x))\n\nnot Wrong(stafford)\n\nForward(stafford) and forall x (Forward(x) -> Liturgical(x)) -> therefore Liturgical(stafford) Liturgical(stafford) and Forward(stafford) and forall x (Liturgical(x) and Forward(x) -> Wrong(x)) -> therefore Wrong(stafford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Jean is totipotent. Jean is vincible. Jean is gestural. Jean is adapted. Jean is hempen. Jean is freaky. Jeniece is totipotent. Jeniece is vincible. Jeniece is adapted. Jeniece is hempen. Jeniece is freaky. Rona is bastardly. Rona is gestural. Rona is freaky. Tiffie is bastardly. Tiffie is gestural. All bastardly, freaky things are totipotent. If something is hempen then it is gestural. All adapted things are bastardly. If something is adapted then it is hempen. If something is freaky and gestural then it is adapted. Red things are freaky. Tiffie is hempen.", "logic": "\nTotipotent(jean)\nVincible(jean)\nGestural(jean)\nAdapted(jean)\nHempen(jean)\nFreaky(jean)\nTotipotent(jeniece)\nVincible(jeniece)\nAdapted(jeniece)\nHempen(jeniece)\nFreaky(jeniece)\nBastardly(rona)\nGestural(rona)\nFreaky(rona)\nBastardly(tiffie)\nGestural(tiffie)\nforall x (Bastardly(x) and Freaky(x) -> Totipotent(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Gestural(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) and Gestural(x) -> Adapted(x))\nforall x (Gestural(x) -> Freaky(x))\n\nHempen(tiffie)\n\nGestural(tiffie) and forall x (Gestural(x) -> Freaky(x)) -> therefore Freaky(tiffie) Freaky(tiffie) and Gestural(tiffie) and forall x (Freaky(x) and Gestural(x) -> Adapted(x)) -> therefore Adapted(tiffie) Adapted(tiffie) and forall x (Adapted(x) -> Hempen(x)) -> therefore Hempen(tiffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Chryste is needled. Chryste is isothermic. Chryste is factorial. Chryste is benign. Chryste is endogamous. Chryste is pleochroic. Wilie is needled. Wilie is isothermic. Wilie is benign. Wilie is endogamous. Wilie is pleochroic. Windy is shamefaced. Windy is factorial. Windy is pleochroic. Oswell is shamefaced. Oswell is factorial. All shamefaced, pleochroic things are needled. If something is endogamous then it is factorial. All benign things are shamefaced. If something is benign then it is endogamous. If something is pleochroic and factorial then it is benign. Red things are pleochroic. Oswell is not endogamous.", "logic": "\nNeedled(chryste)\nIsothermic(chryste)\nFactorial(chryste)\nBenign(chryste)\nEndogamous(chryste)\nPleochroic(chryste)\nNeedled(wilie)\nIsothermic(wilie)\nBenign(wilie)\nEndogamous(wilie)\nPleochroic(wilie)\nShamefaced(windy)\nFactorial(windy)\nPleochroic(windy)\nShamefaced(oswell)\nFactorial(oswell)\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and Pleochroic(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Endogamous(x) -> Factorial(x))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Shamefaced(x))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Endogamous(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Factorial(x) -> Benign(x))\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> Pleochroic(x))\n\nnot Endogamous(oswell)\n\nFactorial(oswell) and forall x (Factorial(x) -> Pleochroic(x)) -> therefore Pleochroic(oswell) Pleochroic(oswell) and Factorial(oswell) and forall x (Pleochroic(x) and Factorial(x) -> Benign(x)) -> therefore Benign(oswell) Benign(oswell) and forall x (Benign(x) -> Endogamous(x)) -> therefore Endogamous(oswell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Tyrone is allergic. Tyrone is burnt. Tyrone is blamable. Tyrone is hammy. Tyrone is grilled. Tyrone is ablaze. Lindi is allergic. Lindi is burnt. Lindi is hammy. Lindi is grilled. Lindi is ablaze. Lilas is snooty. Lilas is blamable. Lilas is ablaze. Lauree is snooty. Lauree is blamable. All snooty, ablaze things are allergic. If something is grilled then it is blamable. All hammy things are snooty. If something is hammy then it is grilled. If something is ablaze and blamable then it is hammy. Red things are ablaze. Lilas is not burnt.", "logic": "\nAllergic(tyrone)\nBurnt(tyrone)\nBlamable(tyrone)\nHammy(tyrone)\nGrilled(tyrone)\nAblaze(tyrone)\nAllergic(lindi)\nBurnt(lindi)\nHammy(lindi)\nGrilled(lindi)\nAblaze(lindi)\nSnooty(lilas)\nBlamable(lilas)\nAblaze(lilas)\nSnooty(lauree)\nBlamable(lauree)\nforall x (Snooty(x) and Ablaze(x) -> Allergic(x))\nforall x (Grilled(x) -> Blamable(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Snooty(x))\nforall x (Hammy(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) and Blamable(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Blamable(x) -> Ablaze(x))\n\nnot Burnt(lilas)\n\nnot Burnt(lilas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Nikkie is rending. Nikkie is romantic. Nikkie is astragalar. Nikkie is stoneless. Nikkie is unflavored. Nikkie is muddled. Joyan is rending. Joyan is romantic. Joyan is stoneless. Joyan is unflavored. Joyan is muddled. Paten is attachable. Paten is astragalar. Paten is muddled. Moises is attachable. Moises is astragalar. All attachable, muddled things are rending. If something is unflavored then it is astragalar. All stoneless things are attachable. If something is stoneless then it is unflavored. If something is muddled and astragalar then it is stoneless. Red things are muddled. Moises is romantic.", "logic": "\nRending(nikkie)\nRomantic(nikkie)\nAstragalar(nikkie)\nStoneless(nikkie)\nUnflavored(nikkie)\nMuddled(nikkie)\nRending(joyan)\nRomantic(joyan)\nStoneless(joyan)\nUnflavored(joyan)\nMuddled(joyan)\nAttachable(paten)\nAstragalar(paten)\nMuddled(paten)\nAttachable(moises)\nAstragalar(moises)\nforall x (Attachable(x) and Muddled(x) -> Rending(x))\nforall x (Unflavored(x) -> Astragalar(x))\nforall x (Stoneless(x) -> Attachable(x))\nforall x (Stoneless(x) -> Unflavored(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) and Astragalar(x) -> Stoneless(x))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> Muddled(x))\n\nRomantic(moises)\n\nRomantic(moises) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1058"} {"premises": "Ezekiel is mousy. Ezekiel is ungummed. Ezekiel is symbolical. Green, hypodermic things are mystified. All mousy, symbolical things are hypodermic. Ezekiel is ungummed.", "logic": "\nMousy(ezekiel)\nUngummed(ezekiel)\nSymbolical(ezekiel)\nforall x (Mousy(x) and Hypodermic(x) -> Mystified(x))\nforall x (Mousy(x) and Symbolical(x) -> Hypodermic(x))\n\nUngummed(ezekiel)\n\ntherefore Ungummed(ezekiel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Xerxes is nosocomial. Xerxes is gracile. Xerxes is askance. Green, barmy things are drizzly. All nosocomial, askance things are barmy. Xerxes is not gracile.", "logic": "\nNosocomial(xerxes)\nGracile(xerxes)\nAskance(xerxes)\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and Barmy(x) -> Drizzly(x))\nforall x (Nosocomial(x) and Askance(x) -> Barmy(x))\n\nnot Gracile(xerxes)\n\ntherefore Gracile(xerxes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Inesita is motorless. Inesita is bantering. Inesita is ratty. Green, unwilled things are ubiquitous. All motorless, ratty things are unwilled. Inesita is unwilled.", "logic": "\nMotorless(inesita)\nBantering(inesita)\nRatty(inesita)\nforall x (Motorless(x) and Unwilled(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Motorless(x) and Ratty(x) -> Unwilled(x))\n\nUnwilled(inesita)\n\nMotorless(inesita) and Ratty(inesita) and forall x (Motorless(x) and Ratty(x) -> Unwilled(x)) -> therefore Unwilled(inesita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Genna is phobic. Genna is creamy. Genna is mutagenic. Green, unparented things are aqueous. All phobic, mutagenic things are unparented. Genna is not unparented.", "logic": "\nPhobic(genna)\nCreamy(genna)\nMutagenic(genna)\nforall x (Phobic(x) and Unparented(x) -> Aqueous(x))\nforall x (Phobic(x) and Mutagenic(x) -> Unparented(x))\n\nnot Unparented(genna)\n\nPhobic(genna) and Mutagenic(genna) and forall x (Phobic(x) and Mutagenic(x) -> Unparented(x)) -> therefore Unparented(genna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Berke is obovate. Berke is biramous. Berke is groundless. Green, fond things are unethical. All obovate, groundless things are fond. Berke is unethical.", "logic": "\nObovate(berke)\nBiramous(berke)\nGroundless(berke)\nforall x (Obovate(x) and Fond(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Obovate(x) and Groundless(x) -> Fond(x))\n\nUnethical(berke)\n\nObovate(berke) and Groundless(berke) and forall x (Obovate(x) and Groundless(x) -> Fond(x)) -> therefore Fond(berke) Obovate(berke) and Fond(berke) and forall x (Obovate(x) and Fond(x) -> Unethical(x)) -> therefore Unethical(berke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Parke is speakable. Parke is numbing. Parke is published. Green, suckled things are extinct. All speakable, published things are suckled. Parke is not extinct.", "logic": "\nSpeakable(parke)\nNumbing(parke)\nPublished(parke)\nforall x (Speakable(x) and Suckled(x) -> Extinct(x))\nforall x (Speakable(x) and Published(x) -> Suckled(x))\n\nnot Extinct(parke)\n\nSpeakable(parke) and Published(parke) and forall x (Speakable(x) and Published(x) -> Suckled(x)) -> therefore Suckled(parke) Speakable(parke) and Suckled(parke) and forall x (Speakable(x) and Suckled(x) -> Extinct(x)) -> therefore Extinct(parke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Gil is ringlike. Gil is hispanic. Gil is acetous. Green, indecent things are communal. All ringlike, acetous things are indecent. Gil is not cold.", "logic": "\nRinglike(gil)\nHispanic(gil)\nAcetous(gil)\nforall x (Ringlike(x) and Indecent(x) -> Communal(x))\nforall x (Ringlike(x) and Acetous(x) -> Indecent(x))\n\nnot Cold(gil)\n\nnot Cold(gil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "Poul is unsaved. Poul is interwoven. Poul is biserrate. Green, cathedral things are lubricated. All unsaved, biserrate things are cathedral. Poul is young.", "logic": "\nUnsaved(poul)\nInterwoven(poul)\nBiserrate(poul)\nforall x (Unsaved(x) and Cathedral(x) -> Lubricated(x))\nforall x (Unsaved(x) and Biserrate(x) -> Cathedral(x))\n\nYoung(poul)\n\nYoung(poul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1808"} {"premises": "The claudia is ecumenical. The claudia is uruguayan. The claudia deign the foster. The claudia rely the foster. The nan does not eat the foster. The nan is concerted. The nan deign the claudia. The nan does not need the foster. The nan rely the claudia. The foster prefer the nan. The foster deign the nan. The foster does not see the nan. If someone rely the foster then they are concerted. The foster deign the nan.", "logic": "\nEcumenical(claudia)\nUruguayan(claudia)\nDeign(claudia, foster)\nRely(claudia, foster)\nnot Prefer(nan, foster)\nConcerted(nan)\nDeign(nan, claudia)\nnot Deign(nan, foster)\nRely(nan, claudia)\nPrefer(foster, nan)\nDeign(foster, nan)\nnot Rely(foster, nan)\nforall x (Rely(x, foster) -> Concerted(x))\n\nDeign(foster, nan)\n\ntherefore Deign(foster, nan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The crystal is regulated. The crystal is aplanatic. The crystal impact the nettie. The crystal hint the nettie. The donald does not eat the nettie. The donald is nonsweet. The donald impact the crystal. The donald does not need the nettie. The donald hint the crystal. The nettie outbid the donald. The nettie impact the donald. The nettie does not see the donald. If someone hint the nettie then they are nonsweet. The crystal is not regulated.", "logic": "\nRegulated(crystal)\nAplanatic(crystal)\nImpact(crystal, nettie)\nHint(crystal, nettie)\nnot Outbid(donald, nettie)\nNonsweet(donald)\nImpact(donald, crystal)\nnot Impact(donald, nettie)\nHint(donald, crystal)\nOutbid(nettie, donald)\nImpact(nettie, donald)\nnot Hint(nettie, donald)\nforall x (Hint(x, nettie) -> Nonsweet(x))\n\nnot Regulated(crystal)\n\ntherefore Regulated(crystal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The johannah is mauritian. The johannah is unlipped. The johannah backstitch the ellie. The johannah downsize the ellie. The beryl does not eat the ellie. The beryl is lanate. The beryl backstitch the johannah. The beryl does not need the ellie. The beryl downsize the johannah. The ellie denature the beryl. The ellie backstitch the beryl. The ellie does not see the beryl. If someone downsize the ellie then they are lanate. The johannah is lanate.", "logic": "\nMauritian(johannah)\nUnlipped(johannah)\nBackstitch(johannah, ellie)\nDownsize(johannah, ellie)\nnot Denature(beryl, ellie)\nLanate(beryl)\nBackstitch(beryl, johannah)\nnot Backstitch(beryl, ellie)\nDownsize(beryl, johannah)\nDenature(ellie, beryl)\nBackstitch(ellie, beryl)\nnot Downsize(ellie, beryl)\nforall x (Downsize(x, ellie) -> Lanate(x))\n\nLanate(johannah)\n\nDownsize(johannah, ellie) and forall x (Downsize(x, ellie) -> Lanate(x)) -> therefore Lanate(johannah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The truman is giving. The truman is projected. The truman osculate the jacklin. The truman placate the jacklin. The ruthe does not eat the jacklin. The ruthe is lank. The ruthe osculate the truman. The ruthe does not need the jacklin. The ruthe placate the truman. The jacklin depone the ruthe. The jacklin osculate the ruthe. The jacklin does not see the ruthe. If someone placate the jacklin then they are lank. The truman is not lank.", "logic": "\nGiving(truman)\nProjected(truman)\nOsculate(truman, jacklin)\nPlacate(truman, jacklin)\nnot Depone(ruthe, jacklin)\nLank(ruthe)\nOsculate(ruthe, truman)\nnot Osculate(ruthe, jacklin)\nPlacate(ruthe, truman)\nDepone(jacklin, ruthe)\nOsculate(jacklin, ruthe)\nnot Placate(jacklin, ruthe)\nforall x (Placate(x, jacklin) -> Lank(x))\n\nnot Lank(truman)\n\nPlacate(truman, jacklin) and forall x (Placate(x, jacklin) -> Lank(x)) -> therefore Lank(truman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The letti is undraped. The letti is shrinkable. The letti englut the grata. The letti trick the grata. The pavla does not eat the grata. The pavla is covalent. The pavla englut the letti. The pavla does not need the grata. The pavla trick the letti. The grata bottle the pavla. The grata englut the pavla. The grata does not see the pavla. If someone trick the grata then they are covalent. The grata is not covalent.", "logic": "\nUndraped(letti)\nShrinkable(letti)\nEnglut(letti, grata)\nTrick(letti, grata)\nnot Bottle(pavla, grata)\nCovalent(pavla)\nEnglut(pavla, letti)\nnot Englut(pavla, grata)\nTrick(pavla, letti)\nBottle(grata, pavla)\nEnglut(grata, pavla)\nnot Trick(grata, pavla)\nforall x (Trick(x, grata) -> Covalent(x))\n\nnot Covalent(grata)\n\nforall x (Trick(x, grata) -> Covalent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The marchelle is canted. The marchelle is leering. The marchelle reform the heinrich. The marchelle meter the heinrich. The herrick does not eat the heinrich. The herrick is uterine. The herrick reform the marchelle. The herrick does not need the heinrich. The herrick meter the marchelle. The heinrich catechise the herrick. The heinrich reform the herrick. The heinrich does not see the herrick. If someone meter the heinrich then they are uterine. The heinrich catechise the heinrich.", "logic": "\nCanted(marchelle)\nLeering(marchelle)\nReform(marchelle, heinrich)\nMeter(marchelle, heinrich)\nnot Catechise(herrick, heinrich)\nUterine(herrick)\nReform(herrick, marchelle)\nnot Reform(herrick, heinrich)\nMeter(herrick, marchelle)\nCatechise(heinrich, herrick)\nReform(heinrich, herrick)\nnot Meter(heinrich, herrick)\nforall x (Meter(x, heinrich) -> Uterine(x))\n\nCatechise(heinrich, heinrich)\n\nCatechise(heinrich, heinrich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The bernadina is rowdy. The bernadina is clean. The bernadina ramble the tiebout. The bernadina enrage the tiebout. The ajai does not eat the tiebout. The ajai is carolean. The ajai ramble the bernadina. The ajai does not need the tiebout. The ajai enrage the bernadina. The tiebout penalize the ajai. The tiebout ramble the ajai. The tiebout does not see the ajai. If someone enrage the tiebout then they are carolean. The ajai does not need the ajai.", "logic": "\nRowdy(bernadina)\nClean(bernadina)\nRamble(bernadina, tiebout)\nEnrage(bernadina, tiebout)\nnot Penalize(ajai, tiebout)\nCarolean(ajai)\nRamble(ajai, bernadina)\nnot Ramble(ajai, tiebout)\nEnrage(ajai, bernadina)\nPenalize(tiebout, ajai)\nRamble(tiebout, ajai)\nnot Enrage(tiebout, ajai)\nforall x (Enrage(x, tiebout) -> Carolean(x))\n\nnot Ramble(ajai, ajai)\n\nnot Ramble(ajai, ajai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The carolie is every. The carolie is duncical. The carolie sheet the justine. The carolie misspend the justine. The erastus does not eat the justine. The erastus is tellurian. The erastus sheet the carolie. The erastus does not need the justine. The erastus misspend the carolie. The justine fray the erastus. The justine sheet the erastus. The justine does not see the erastus. If someone misspend the justine then they are tellurian. The erastus is young.", "logic": "\nEvery(carolie)\nDuncical(carolie)\nSheet(carolie, justine)\nMisspend(carolie, justine)\nnot Fray(erastus, justine)\nTellurian(erastus)\nSheet(erastus, carolie)\nnot Sheet(erastus, justine)\nMisspend(erastus, carolie)\nFray(justine, erastus)\nSheet(justine, erastus)\nnot Misspend(justine, erastus)\nforall x (Misspend(x, justine) -> Tellurian(x))\n\nYoung(erastus)\n\nYoung(erastus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-192"} {"premises": "The chet is indictable. The chet gravitate the cori. The chet gravitate the winford. The cori is sombre. The cori gravitate the chet. The cori suppose the chet. The cori suppose the winford. The winford is public. The winford is sombre. The winford is tref. The winford gravitate the chet. The winford gravitate the cori. The winford suppose the chet. The winford suppose the cori. The winford venture the chet. The winford venture the cori. If something gravitate the cori then the cori gravitate the chet. If something venture the winford and it gravitate the chet then it suppose the chet. If something is tref and it gravitate the chet then the chet gravitate the winford. The winford gravitate the chet.", "logic": "\nIndictable(chet)\nGravitate(chet, cori)\nGravitate(chet, winford)\nSombre(cori)\nGravitate(cori, chet)\nSuppose(cori, chet)\nSuppose(cori, winford)\nPublic(winford)\nSombre(winford)\nTref(winford)\nGravitate(winford, chet)\nGravitate(winford, cori)\nSuppose(winford, chet)\nSuppose(winford, cori)\nVenture(winford, chet)\nVenture(winford, cori)\nforall x (Gravitate(x, cori) -> Gravitate(cori, chet))\nforall x (Venture(x, winford) and Gravitate(x, chet) -> Suppose(x, chet))\nforall x (Tref(x) and Gravitate(x, chet) -> Gravitate(chet, winford))\n\nGravitate(winford, chet)\n\ntherefore Gravitate(winford, chet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-576"} {"premises": "The tasia is washy. The tasia realize the martita. The tasia realize the xerxes. The martita is recurved. The martita realize the tasia. The martita coeducate the tasia. The martita coeducate the xerxes. The xerxes is fair. The xerxes is recurved. The xerxes is unread. The xerxes realize the tasia. The xerxes realize the martita. The xerxes coeducate the tasia. The xerxes coeducate the martita. The xerxes thaw the tasia. The xerxes thaw the martita. If something realize the martita then the martita realize the tasia. If something thaw the xerxes and it realize the tasia then it coeducate the tasia. If something is unread and it realize the tasia then the tasia realize the xerxes. The martita does not like the tasia.", "logic": "\nWashy(tasia)\nRealize(tasia, martita)\nRealize(tasia, xerxes)\nRecurved(martita)\nRealize(martita, tasia)\nCoeducate(martita, tasia)\nCoeducate(martita, xerxes)\nFair(xerxes)\nRecurved(xerxes)\nUnread(xerxes)\nRealize(xerxes, tasia)\nRealize(xerxes, martita)\nCoeducate(xerxes, tasia)\nCoeducate(xerxes, martita)\nThaw(xerxes, tasia)\nThaw(xerxes, martita)\nforall x (Realize(x, martita) -> Realize(martita, tasia))\nforall x (Thaw(x, xerxes) and Realize(x, tasia) -> Coeducate(x, tasia))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Realize(x, tasia) -> Realize(tasia, xerxes))\n\nnot Realize(martita, tasia)\n\ntherefore Realize(martita, tasia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-576"} {"premises": "The rosanne is uncheerful. The rosanne impress the lemmy. The rosanne impress the odette. The lemmy is brindle. The lemmy impress the rosanne. The lemmy structure the rosanne. The lemmy structure the odette. The odette is yearly. The odette is brindle. The odette is rocky. The odette impress the rosanne. The odette impress the lemmy. The odette structure the rosanne. The odette structure the lemmy. The odette indulge the rosanne. The odette indulge the lemmy. If something impress the lemmy then the lemmy impress the rosanne. If something indulge the odette and it impress the rosanne then it structure the rosanne. If something is rocky and it impress the rosanne then the rosanne impress the odette. The rosanne does not see the rosanne.", "logic": "\nUncheerful(rosanne)\nImpress(rosanne, lemmy)\nImpress(rosanne, odette)\nBrindle(lemmy)\nImpress(lemmy, rosanne)\nStructure(lemmy, rosanne)\nStructure(lemmy, odette)\nYearly(odette)\nBrindle(odette)\nRocky(odette)\nImpress(odette, rosanne)\nImpress(odette, lemmy)\nStructure(odette, rosanne)\nStructure(odette, lemmy)\nIndulge(odette, rosanne)\nIndulge(odette, lemmy)\nforall x (Impress(x, lemmy) -> Impress(lemmy, rosanne))\nforall x (Indulge(x, odette) and Impress(x, rosanne) -> Structure(x, rosanne))\nforall x (Rocky(x) and Impress(x, rosanne) -> Impress(rosanne, odette))\n\nnot Structure(rosanne, rosanne)\n\nforall x (Indulge(x, odette) and Impress(x, rosanne) -> Structure(x, rosanne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-576"} {"premises": "The willis is sparing. The willis surrender the petunia. The willis surrender the wilbert. The petunia is vietnamese. The petunia surrender the willis. The petunia paddle the willis. The petunia paddle the wilbert. The wilbert is imprecise. The wilbert is vietnamese. The wilbert is bipartite. The wilbert surrender the willis. The wilbert surrender the petunia. The wilbert paddle the willis. The wilbert paddle the petunia. The wilbert aurify the willis. The wilbert aurify the petunia. If something surrender the petunia then the petunia surrender the willis. If something aurify the wilbert and it surrender the willis then it paddle the willis. If something is bipartite and it surrender the willis then the willis surrender the wilbert. The petunia aurify the willis.", "logic": "\nSparing(willis)\nSurrender(willis, petunia)\nSurrender(willis, wilbert)\nVietnamese(petunia)\nSurrender(petunia, willis)\nPaddle(petunia, willis)\nPaddle(petunia, wilbert)\nImprecise(wilbert)\nVietnamese(wilbert)\nBipartite(wilbert)\nSurrender(wilbert, willis)\nSurrender(wilbert, petunia)\nPaddle(wilbert, willis)\nPaddle(wilbert, petunia)\nAurify(wilbert, willis)\nAurify(wilbert, petunia)\nforall x (Surrender(x, petunia) -> Surrender(petunia, willis))\nforall x (Aurify(x, wilbert) and Surrender(x, willis) -> Paddle(x, willis))\nforall x (Bipartite(x) and Surrender(x, willis) -> Surrender(willis, wilbert))\n\nAurify(petunia, willis)\n\nAurify(petunia, willis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-576"} {"premises": "The aimil lignify the darcee. The aimil is jittery. The aimil is first. The aimil resettle the darcee. The aimil scrawl the doris. The aimil scrawl the darcee. The doris lignify the darcee. The doris is first. The doris scrawl the aimil. The darcee is actual. The darcee is vicious. The darcee resettle the aimil. If something resettle the darcee and it is first then it is jittery. If something resettle the darcee and it lignify the darcee then the darcee resettle the doris. If something lignify the darcee then it is vicious. If something scrawl the darcee then the darcee resettle the doris. If the doris lignify the aimil then the doris resettle the darcee. If the doris scrawl the darcee and the darcee scrawl the doris then the doris is jittery. If something resettle the aimil then it scrawl the doris. If something is vicious then it lignify the aimil. The darcee resettle the aimil.", "logic": "\nLignify(aimil, darcee)\nJittery(aimil)\nFirst(aimil)\nResettle(aimil, darcee)\nScrawl(aimil, doris)\nScrawl(aimil, darcee)\nLignify(doris, darcee)\nFirst(doris)\nScrawl(doris, aimil)\nActual(darcee)\nVicious(darcee)\nResettle(darcee, aimil)\nforall x (Resettle(x, darcee) and First(x) -> Jittery(x))\nforall x (Resettle(x, darcee) and Lignify(x, darcee) -> Resettle(darcee, doris))\nforall x (Lignify(x, darcee) -> Vicious(x))\nforall x (Scrawl(x, darcee) -> Resettle(darcee, doris))\nLignify(doris, aimil) -> Resettle(doris, darcee)\nScrawl(doris, darcee) and Scrawl(darcee, doris) -> Jittery(doris)\nforall x (Resettle(x, aimil) -> Scrawl(x, doris))\nforall x (Vicious(x) -> Lignify(x, aimil))\n\nResettle(darcee, aimil)\n\ntherefore Resettle(darcee, aimil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The odilia reflate the janey. The odilia is virtuous. The odilia is wakeless. The odilia solidify the janey. The odilia recover the fraser. The odilia recover the janey. The fraser reflate the janey. The fraser is wakeless. The fraser recover the odilia. The janey is rhomboid. The janey is abrasive. The janey solidify the odilia. If something solidify the janey and it is wakeless then it is virtuous. If something solidify the janey and it reflate the janey then the janey solidify the fraser. If something reflate the janey then it is abrasive. If something recover the janey then the janey solidify the fraser. If the fraser reflate the odilia then the fraser solidify the janey. If the fraser recover the janey and the janey recover the fraser then the fraser is virtuous. If something solidify the odilia then it recover the fraser. If something is abrasive then it reflate the odilia. The odilia is not wakeless.", "logic": "\nReflate(odilia, janey)\nVirtuous(odilia)\nWakeless(odilia)\nSolidify(odilia, janey)\nRecover(odilia, fraser)\nRecover(odilia, janey)\nReflate(fraser, janey)\nWakeless(fraser)\nRecover(fraser, odilia)\nRhomboid(janey)\nAbrasive(janey)\nSolidify(janey, odilia)\nforall x (Solidify(x, janey) and Wakeless(x) -> Virtuous(x))\nforall x (Solidify(x, janey) and Reflate(x, janey) -> Solidify(janey, fraser))\nforall x (Reflate(x, janey) -> Abrasive(x))\nforall x (Recover(x, janey) -> Solidify(janey, fraser))\nReflate(fraser, odilia) -> Solidify(fraser, janey)\nRecover(fraser, janey) and Recover(janey, fraser) -> Virtuous(fraser)\nforall x (Solidify(x, odilia) -> Recover(x, fraser))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) -> Reflate(x, odilia))\n\nnot Wakeless(odilia)\n\ntherefore Wakeless(odilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The ernest derange the jobye. The ernest is pictorial. The ernest is heavyset. The ernest trump the jobye. The ernest serialise the yule. The ernest serialise the jobye. The yule derange the jobye. The yule is heavyset. The yule serialise the ernest. The jobye is disheveled. The jobye is frumpish. The jobye trump the ernest. If something trump the jobye and it is heavyset then it is pictorial. If something trump the jobye and it derange the jobye then the jobye trump the yule. If something derange the jobye then it is frumpish. If something serialise the jobye then the jobye trump the yule. If the yule derange the ernest then the yule trump the jobye. If the yule serialise the jobye and the jobye serialise the yule then the yule is pictorial. If something trump the ernest then it serialise the yule. If something is frumpish then it derange the ernest. The jobye trump the yule.", "logic": "\nDerange(ernest, jobye)\nPictorial(ernest)\nHeavyset(ernest)\nTrump(ernest, jobye)\nSerialise(ernest, yule)\nSerialise(ernest, jobye)\nDerange(yule, jobye)\nHeavyset(yule)\nSerialise(yule, ernest)\nDisheveled(jobye)\nFrumpish(jobye)\nTrump(jobye, ernest)\nforall x (Trump(x, jobye) and Heavyset(x) -> Pictorial(x))\nforall x (Trump(x, jobye) and Derange(x, jobye) -> Trump(jobye, yule))\nforall x (Derange(x, jobye) -> Frumpish(x))\nforall x (Serialise(x, jobye) -> Trump(jobye, yule))\nDerange(yule, ernest) -> Trump(yule, jobye)\nSerialise(yule, jobye) and Serialise(jobye, yule) -> Pictorial(yule)\nforall x (Trump(x, ernest) -> Serialise(x, yule))\nforall x (Frumpish(x) -> Derange(x, ernest))\n\nTrump(jobye, yule)\n\nSerialise(ernest, jobye) and forall x (Serialise(x, jobye) -> Trump(jobye, yule)) -> therefore Trump(jobye, yule)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The zary second the christan. The zary is subjugated. The zary is frankish. The zary rifle the christan. The zary damage the shirah. The zary damage the christan. The shirah second the christan. The shirah is frankish. The shirah damage the zary. The christan is polysemous. The christan is haughty. The christan rifle the zary. If something rifle the christan and it is frankish then it is subjugated. If something rifle the christan and it second the christan then the christan rifle the shirah. If something second the christan then it is haughty. If something damage the christan then the christan rifle the shirah. If the shirah second the zary then the shirah rifle the christan. If the shirah damage the christan and the christan damage the shirah then the shirah is subjugated. If something rifle the zary then it damage the shirah. If something is haughty then it second the zary. The christan does not like the shirah.", "logic": "\nSecond(zary, christan)\nSubjugated(zary)\nFrankish(zary)\nRifle(zary, christan)\nDamage(zary, shirah)\nDamage(zary, christan)\nSecond(shirah, christan)\nFrankish(shirah)\nDamage(shirah, zary)\nPolysemous(christan)\nHaughty(christan)\nRifle(christan, zary)\nforall x (Rifle(x, christan) and Frankish(x) -> Subjugated(x))\nforall x (Rifle(x, christan) and Second(x, christan) -> Rifle(christan, shirah))\nforall x (Second(x, christan) -> Haughty(x))\nforall x (Damage(x, christan) -> Rifle(christan, shirah))\nSecond(shirah, zary) -> Rifle(shirah, christan)\nDamage(shirah, christan) and Damage(christan, shirah) -> Subjugated(shirah)\nforall x (Rifle(x, zary) -> Damage(x, shirah))\nforall x (Haughty(x) -> Second(x, zary))\n\nnot Rifle(christan, shirah)\n\nDamage(zary, christan) and forall x (Damage(x, christan) -> Rifle(christan, shirah)) -> therefore Rifle(christan, shirah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The sherlock annotate the win. The sherlock is beardless. The sherlock is norse. The sherlock panic the win. The sherlock transport the gina. The sherlock transport the win. The gina annotate the win. The gina is norse. The gina transport the sherlock. The win is schoolwide. The win is roseate. The win panic the sherlock. If something panic the win and it is norse then it is beardless. If something panic the win and it annotate the win then the win panic the gina. If something annotate the win then it is roseate. If something transport the win then the win panic the gina. If the gina annotate the sherlock then the gina panic the win. If the gina transport the win and the win transport the gina then the gina is beardless. If something panic the sherlock then it transport the gina. If something is roseate then it annotate the sherlock. The sherlock annotate the sherlock.", "logic": "\nAnnotate(sherlock, win)\nBeardless(sherlock)\nNorse(sherlock)\nPanic(sherlock, win)\nTransport(sherlock, gina)\nTransport(sherlock, win)\nAnnotate(gina, win)\nNorse(gina)\nTransport(gina, sherlock)\nSchoolwide(win)\nRoseate(win)\nPanic(win, sherlock)\nforall x (Panic(x, win) and Norse(x) -> Beardless(x))\nforall x (Panic(x, win) and Annotate(x, win) -> Panic(win, gina))\nforall x (Annotate(x, win) -> Roseate(x))\nforall x (Transport(x, win) -> Panic(win, gina))\nAnnotate(gina, sherlock) -> Panic(gina, win)\nTransport(gina, win) and Transport(win, gina) -> Beardless(gina)\nforall x (Panic(x, sherlock) -> Transport(x, gina))\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> Annotate(x, sherlock))\n\nAnnotate(sherlock, sherlock)\n\nAnnotate(sherlock, win) and forall x (Annotate(x, win) -> Roseate(x)) -> therefore Roseate(sherlock) Roseate(sherlock) and forall x (Roseate(x) -> Annotate(x, sherlock)) -> therefore Annotate(sherlock, sherlock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The deni eject the ruddy. The deni is drunk. The deni is legless. The deni hydrolyze the ruddy. The deni companion the cherilynn. The deni companion the ruddy. The cherilynn eject the ruddy. The cherilynn is legless. The cherilynn companion the deni. The ruddy is ulnar. The ruddy is shaved. The ruddy hydrolyze the deni. If something hydrolyze the ruddy and it is legless then it is drunk. If something hydrolyze the ruddy and it eject the ruddy then the ruddy hydrolyze the cherilynn. If something eject the ruddy then it is shaved. If something companion the ruddy then the ruddy hydrolyze the cherilynn. If the cherilynn eject the deni then the cherilynn hydrolyze the ruddy. If the cherilynn companion the ruddy and the ruddy companion the cherilynn then the cherilynn is drunk. If something hydrolyze the deni then it companion the cherilynn. If something is shaved then it eject the deni. The cherilynn does not chase the deni.", "logic": "\nEject(deni, ruddy)\nDrunk(deni)\nLegless(deni)\nHydrolyze(deni, ruddy)\nCompanion(deni, cherilynn)\nCompanion(deni, ruddy)\nEject(cherilynn, ruddy)\nLegless(cherilynn)\nCompanion(cherilynn, deni)\nUlnar(ruddy)\nShaved(ruddy)\nHydrolyze(ruddy, deni)\nforall x (Hydrolyze(x, ruddy) and Legless(x) -> Drunk(x))\nforall x (Hydrolyze(x, ruddy) and Eject(x, ruddy) -> Hydrolyze(ruddy, cherilynn))\nforall x (Eject(x, ruddy) -> Shaved(x))\nforall x (Companion(x, ruddy) -> Hydrolyze(ruddy, cherilynn))\nEject(cherilynn, deni) -> Hydrolyze(cherilynn, ruddy)\nCompanion(cherilynn, ruddy) and Companion(ruddy, cherilynn) -> Drunk(cherilynn)\nforall x (Hydrolyze(x, deni) -> Companion(x, cherilynn))\nforall x (Shaved(x) -> Eject(x, deni))\n\nnot Eject(cherilynn, deni)\n\nEject(cherilynn, ruddy) and forall x (Eject(x, ruddy) -> Shaved(x)) -> therefore Shaved(cherilynn) Shaved(cherilynn) and forall x (Shaved(x) -> Eject(x, deni)) -> therefore Eject(cherilynn, deni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The micheline nibble the jesselyn. The micheline is layered. The micheline is social. The micheline enounce the jesselyn. The micheline consider the mikael. The micheline consider the jesselyn. The mikael nibble the jesselyn. The mikael is social. The mikael consider the micheline. The jesselyn is atomic. The jesselyn is crippled. The jesselyn enounce the micheline. If something enounce the jesselyn and it is social then it is layered. If something enounce the jesselyn and it nibble the jesselyn then the jesselyn enounce the mikael. If something nibble the jesselyn then it is crippled. If something consider the jesselyn then the jesselyn enounce the mikael. If the mikael nibble the micheline then the mikael enounce the jesselyn. If the mikael consider the jesselyn and the jesselyn consider the mikael then the mikael is layered. If something enounce the micheline then it consider the mikael. If something is crippled then it nibble the micheline. The mikael enounce the jesselyn.", "logic": "\nNibble(micheline, jesselyn)\nLayered(micheline)\nSocial(micheline)\nEnounce(micheline, jesselyn)\nConsider(micheline, mikael)\nConsider(micheline, jesselyn)\nNibble(mikael, jesselyn)\nSocial(mikael)\nConsider(mikael, micheline)\nAtomic(jesselyn)\nCrippled(jesselyn)\nEnounce(jesselyn, micheline)\nforall x (Enounce(x, jesselyn) and Social(x) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Enounce(x, jesselyn) and Nibble(x, jesselyn) -> Enounce(jesselyn, mikael))\nforall x (Nibble(x, jesselyn) -> Crippled(x))\nforall x (Consider(x, jesselyn) -> Enounce(jesselyn, mikael))\nNibble(mikael, micheline) -> Enounce(mikael, jesselyn)\nConsider(mikael, jesselyn) and Consider(jesselyn, mikael) -> Layered(mikael)\nforall x (Enounce(x, micheline) -> Consider(x, mikael))\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Nibble(x, micheline))\n\nEnounce(mikael, jesselyn)\n\nNibble(mikael, jesselyn) and forall x (Nibble(x, jesselyn) -> Crippled(x)) -> therefore Crippled(mikael) Crippled(mikael) and forall x (Crippled(x) -> Nibble(x, micheline)) -> therefore Nibble(mikael, micheline) Nibble(mikael, micheline) and Nibble(mikael, micheline) -> Enounce(mikael, jesselyn) -> therefore Enounce(mikael, jesselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The jermain minify the moyna. The jermain is priggish. The jermain is momentous. The jermain benficiate the moyna. The jermain subsidise the nance. The jermain subsidise the moyna. The nance minify the moyna. The nance is momentous. The nance subsidise the jermain. The moyna is afrikaans. The moyna is keynesian. The moyna benficiate the jermain. If something benficiate the moyna and it is momentous then it is priggish. If something benficiate the moyna and it minify the moyna then the moyna benficiate the nance. If something minify the moyna then it is keynesian. If something subsidise the moyna then the moyna benficiate the nance. If the nance minify the jermain then the nance benficiate the moyna. If the nance subsidise the moyna and the moyna subsidise the nance then the nance is priggish. If something benficiate the jermain then it subsidise the nance. If something is keynesian then it minify the jermain. The nance does not like the moyna.", "logic": "\nMinify(jermain, moyna)\nPriggish(jermain)\nMomentous(jermain)\nBenficiate(jermain, moyna)\nSubsidise(jermain, nance)\nSubsidise(jermain, moyna)\nMinify(nance, moyna)\nMomentous(nance)\nSubsidise(nance, jermain)\nAfrikaans(moyna)\nKeynesian(moyna)\nBenficiate(moyna, jermain)\nforall x (Benficiate(x, moyna) and Momentous(x) -> Priggish(x))\nforall x (Benficiate(x, moyna) and Minify(x, moyna) -> Benficiate(moyna, nance))\nforall x (Minify(x, moyna) -> Keynesian(x))\nforall x (Subsidise(x, moyna) -> Benficiate(moyna, nance))\nMinify(nance, jermain) -> Benficiate(nance, moyna)\nSubsidise(nance, moyna) and Subsidise(moyna, nance) -> Priggish(nance)\nforall x (Benficiate(x, jermain) -> Subsidise(x, nance))\nforall x (Keynesian(x) -> Minify(x, jermain))\n\nnot Benficiate(nance, moyna)\n\nMinify(nance, moyna) and forall x (Minify(x, moyna) -> Keynesian(x)) -> therefore Keynesian(nance) Keynesian(nance) and forall x (Keynesian(x) -> Minify(x, jermain)) -> therefore Minify(nance, jermain) Minify(nance, jermain) and Minify(nance, jermain) -> Benficiate(nance, moyna) -> therefore Benficiate(nance, moyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The wait spin the geneva. The wait is apothecial. The wait is laughable. The wait interfere the geneva. The wait simonize the jessa. The wait simonize the geneva. The jessa spin the geneva. The jessa is laughable. The jessa simonize the wait. The geneva is xxxvi. The geneva is equitable. The geneva interfere the wait. If something interfere the geneva and it is laughable then it is apothecial. If something interfere the geneva and it spin the geneva then the geneva interfere the jessa. If something spin the geneva then it is equitable. If something simonize the geneva then the geneva interfere the jessa. If the jessa spin the wait then the jessa interfere the geneva. If the jessa simonize the geneva and the geneva simonize the jessa then the jessa is apothecial. If something interfere the wait then it simonize the jessa. If something is equitable then it spin the wait. The geneva is not apothecial.", "logic": "\nSpin(wait, geneva)\nApothecial(wait)\nLaughable(wait)\nInterfere(wait, geneva)\nSimonize(wait, jessa)\nSimonize(wait, geneva)\nSpin(jessa, geneva)\nLaughable(jessa)\nSimonize(jessa, wait)\nXxxvi(geneva)\nEquitable(geneva)\nInterfere(geneva, wait)\nforall x (Interfere(x, geneva) and Laughable(x) -> Apothecial(x))\nforall x (Interfere(x, geneva) and Spin(x, geneva) -> Interfere(geneva, jessa))\nforall x (Spin(x, geneva) -> Equitable(x))\nforall x (Simonize(x, geneva) -> Interfere(geneva, jessa))\nSpin(jessa, wait) -> Interfere(jessa, geneva)\nSimonize(jessa, geneva) and Simonize(geneva, jessa) -> Apothecial(jessa)\nforall x (Interfere(x, wait) -> Simonize(x, jessa))\nforall x (Equitable(x) -> Spin(x, wait))\n\nnot Apothecial(geneva)\n\nforall x (Interfere(x, geneva) and Laughable(x) -> Apothecial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The ally help the alena. The ally is lowest. The ally is futureless. The ally coal the alena. The ally pinkify the malia. The ally pinkify the alena. The malia help the alena. The malia is futureless. The malia pinkify the ally. The alena is coriaceous. The alena is delusional. The alena coal the ally. If something coal the alena and it is futureless then it is lowest. If something coal the alena and it help the alena then the alena coal the malia. If something help the alena then it is delusional. If something pinkify the alena then the alena coal the malia. If the malia help the ally then the malia coal the alena. If the malia pinkify the alena and the alena pinkify the malia then the malia is lowest. If something coal the ally then it pinkify the malia. If something is delusional then it help the ally. The malia pinkify the malia.", "logic": "\nHelp(ally, alena)\nLowest(ally)\nFutureless(ally)\nCoal(ally, alena)\nPinkify(ally, malia)\nPinkify(ally, alena)\nHelp(malia, alena)\nFutureless(malia)\nPinkify(malia, ally)\nCoriaceous(alena)\nDelusional(alena)\nCoal(alena, ally)\nforall x (Coal(x, alena) and Futureless(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Coal(x, alena) and Help(x, alena) -> Coal(alena, malia))\nforall x (Help(x, alena) -> Delusional(x))\nforall x (Pinkify(x, alena) -> Coal(alena, malia))\nHelp(malia, ally) -> Coal(malia, alena)\nPinkify(malia, alena) and Pinkify(alena, malia) -> Lowest(malia)\nforall x (Coal(x, ally) -> Pinkify(x, malia))\nforall x (Delusional(x) -> Help(x, ally))\n\nPinkify(malia, malia)\n\nforall x (Coal(x, ally) -> Pinkify(x, malia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The tia restrict the flipper. The tia is explosive. The tia is trifoliate. The tia drive the flipper. The tia assemble the rikki. The tia assemble the flipper. The rikki restrict the flipper. The rikki is trifoliate. The rikki assemble the tia. The flipper is doubting. The flipper is libellous. The flipper drive the tia. If something drive the flipper and it is trifoliate then it is explosive. If something drive the flipper and it restrict the flipper then the flipper drive the rikki. If something restrict the flipper then it is libellous. If something assemble the flipper then the flipper drive the rikki. If the rikki restrict the tia then the rikki drive the flipper. If the rikki assemble the flipper and the flipper assemble the rikki then the rikki is explosive. If something drive the tia then it assemble the rikki. If something is libellous then it restrict the tia. The tia does not chase the rikki.", "logic": "\nRestrict(tia, flipper)\nExplosive(tia)\nTrifoliate(tia)\nDrive(tia, flipper)\nAssemble(tia, rikki)\nAssemble(tia, flipper)\nRestrict(rikki, flipper)\nTrifoliate(rikki)\nAssemble(rikki, tia)\nDoubting(flipper)\nLibellous(flipper)\nDrive(flipper, tia)\nforall x (Drive(x, flipper) and Trifoliate(x) -> Explosive(x))\nforall x (Drive(x, flipper) and Restrict(x, flipper) -> Drive(flipper, rikki))\nforall x (Restrict(x, flipper) -> Libellous(x))\nforall x (Assemble(x, flipper) -> Drive(flipper, rikki))\nRestrict(rikki, tia) -> Drive(rikki, flipper)\nAssemble(rikki, flipper) and Assemble(flipper, rikki) -> Explosive(rikki)\nforall x (Drive(x, tia) -> Assemble(x, rikki))\nforall x (Libellous(x) -> Restrict(x, tia))\n\nnot Restrict(tia, rikki)\n\nnot Restrict(tia, rikki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The lanette expound the lethia. The lanette is mannerly. The lanette is reciprocal. The lanette knead the lethia. The lanette politicize the faydra. The lanette politicize the lethia. The faydra expound the lethia. The faydra is reciprocal. The faydra politicize the lanette. The lethia is surplus. The lethia is alphabetic. The lethia knead the lanette. If something knead the lethia and it is reciprocal then it is mannerly. If something knead the lethia and it expound the lethia then the lethia knead the faydra. If something expound the lethia then it is alphabetic. If something politicize the lethia then the lethia knead the faydra. If the faydra expound the lanette then the faydra knead the lethia. If the faydra politicize the lethia and the lethia politicize the faydra then the faydra is mannerly. If something knead the lanette then it politicize the faydra. If something is alphabetic then it expound the lanette. The lethia expound the lethia.", "logic": "\nExpound(lanette, lethia)\nMannerly(lanette)\nReciprocal(lanette)\nKnead(lanette, lethia)\nPoliticize(lanette, faydra)\nPoliticize(lanette, lethia)\nExpound(faydra, lethia)\nReciprocal(faydra)\nPoliticize(faydra, lanette)\nSurplus(lethia)\nAlphabetic(lethia)\nKnead(lethia, lanette)\nforall x (Knead(x, lethia) and Reciprocal(x) -> Mannerly(x))\nforall x (Knead(x, lethia) and Expound(x, lethia) -> Knead(lethia, faydra))\nforall x (Expound(x, lethia) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Politicize(x, lethia) -> Knead(lethia, faydra))\nExpound(faydra, lanette) -> Knead(faydra, lethia)\nPoliticize(faydra, lethia) and Politicize(lethia, faydra) -> Mannerly(faydra)\nforall x (Knead(x, lanette) -> Politicize(x, faydra))\nforall x (Alphabetic(x) -> Expound(x, lanette))\n\nExpound(lethia, lethia)\n\nExpound(lethia, lethia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The damara recite the jaclyn. The damara is adored. The damara is pubescent. The damara curdle the jaclyn. The damara triplicate the zacharie. The damara triplicate the jaclyn. The zacharie recite the jaclyn. The zacharie is pubescent. The zacharie triplicate the damara. The jaclyn is sportive. The jaclyn is undimmed. The jaclyn curdle the damara. If something curdle the jaclyn and it is pubescent then it is adored. If something curdle the jaclyn and it recite the jaclyn then the jaclyn curdle the zacharie. If something recite the jaclyn then it is undimmed. If something triplicate the jaclyn then the jaclyn curdle the zacharie. If the zacharie recite the damara then the zacharie curdle the jaclyn. If the zacharie triplicate the jaclyn and the jaclyn triplicate the zacharie then the zacharie is adored. If something curdle the damara then it triplicate the zacharie. If something is undimmed then it recite the damara. The damara is not red.", "logic": "\nRecite(damara, jaclyn)\nAdored(damara)\nPubescent(damara)\nCurdle(damara, jaclyn)\nTriplicate(damara, zacharie)\nTriplicate(damara, jaclyn)\nRecite(zacharie, jaclyn)\nPubescent(zacharie)\nTriplicate(zacharie, damara)\nSportive(jaclyn)\nUndimmed(jaclyn)\nCurdle(jaclyn, damara)\nforall x (Curdle(x, jaclyn) and Pubescent(x) -> Adored(x))\nforall x (Curdle(x, jaclyn) and Recite(x, jaclyn) -> Curdle(jaclyn, zacharie))\nforall x (Recite(x, jaclyn) -> Undimmed(x))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, jaclyn) -> Curdle(jaclyn, zacharie))\nRecite(zacharie, damara) -> Curdle(zacharie, jaclyn)\nTriplicate(zacharie, jaclyn) and Triplicate(jaclyn, zacharie) -> Adored(zacharie)\nforall x (Curdle(x, damara) -> Triplicate(x, zacharie))\nforall x (Undimmed(x) -> Recite(x, damara))\n\nnot Red(damara)\n\nnot Red(damara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The athene nonplus the joletta. The athene is yankee. The athene is canonic. The athene scrimp the joletta. The athene layer the ryan. The athene layer the joletta. The ryan nonplus the joletta. The ryan is canonic. The ryan layer the athene. The joletta is botulinal. The joletta is crosstown. The joletta scrimp the athene. If something scrimp the joletta and it is canonic then it is yankee. If something scrimp the joletta and it nonplus the joletta then the joletta scrimp the ryan. If something nonplus the joletta then it is crosstown. If something layer the joletta then the joletta scrimp the ryan. If the ryan nonplus the athene then the ryan scrimp the joletta. If the ryan layer the joletta and the joletta layer the ryan then the ryan is yankee. If something scrimp the athene then it layer the ryan. If something is crosstown then it nonplus the athene. The joletta is red.", "logic": "\nNonplus(athene, joletta)\nYankee(athene)\nCanonic(athene)\nScrimp(athene, joletta)\nLayer(athene, ryan)\nLayer(athene, joletta)\nNonplus(ryan, joletta)\nCanonic(ryan)\nLayer(ryan, athene)\nBotulinal(joletta)\nCrosstown(joletta)\nScrimp(joletta, athene)\nforall x (Scrimp(x, joletta) and Canonic(x) -> Yankee(x))\nforall x (Scrimp(x, joletta) and Nonplus(x, joletta) -> Scrimp(joletta, ryan))\nforall x (Nonplus(x, joletta) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Layer(x, joletta) -> Scrimp(joletta, ryan))\nNonplus(ryan, athene) -> Scrimp(ryan, joletta)\nLayer(ryan, joletta) and Layer(joletta, ryan) -> Yankee(ryan)\nforall x (Scrimp(x, athene) -> Layer(x, ryan))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> Nonplus(x, athene))\n\nRed(joletta)\n\nRed(joletta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The genvieve logroll the paddy. The genvieve is calced. The genvieve is thousand. The genvieve bolshevize the paddy. The genvieve detox the hannibal. The genvieve detox the paddy. The hannibal logroll the paddy. The hannibal is thousand. The hannibal detox the genvieve. The paddy is extendible. The paddy is auric. The paddy bolshevize the genvieve. If something bolshevize the paddy and it is thousand then it is calced. If something bolshevize the paddy and it logroll the paddy then the paddy bolshevize the hannibal. If something logroll the paddy then it is auric. If something detox the paddy then the paddy bolshevize the hannibal. If the hannibal logroll the genvieve then the hannibal bolshevize the paddy. If the hannibal detox the paddy and the paddy detox the hannibal then the hannibal is calced. If something bolshevize the genvieve then it detox the hannibal. If something is auric then it logroll the genvieve. The genvieve does not see the genvieve.", "logic": "\nLogroll(genvieve, paddy)\nCalced(genvieve)\nThousand(genvieve)\nBolshevize(genvieve, paddy)\nDetox(genvieve, hannibal)\nDetox(genvieve, paddy)\nLogroll(hannibal, paddy)\nThousand(hannibal)\nDetox(hannibal, genvieve)\nExtendible(paddy)\nAuric(paddy)\nBolshevize(paddy, genvieve)\nforall x (Bolshevize(x, paddy) and Thousand(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Bolshevize(x, paddy) and Logroll(x, paddy) -> Bolshevize(paddy, hannibal))\nforall x (Logroll(x, paddy) -> Auric(x))\nforall x (Detox(x, paddy) -> Bolshevize(paddy, hannibal))\nLogroll(hannibal, genvieve) -> Bolshevize(hannibal, paddy)\nDetox(hannibal, paddy) and Detox(paddy, hannibal) -> Calced(hannibal)\nforall x (Bolshevize(x, genvieve) -> Detox(x, hannibal))\nforall x (Auric(x) -> Logroll(x, genvieve))\n\nnot Detox(genvieve, genvieve)\n\nnot Detox(genvieve, genvieve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The thekla whirr the roselia. The thekla is neuroglial. The thekla is unchanging. The thekla eavesdrop the roselia. The thekla dress the dougie. The thekla dress the roselia. The dougie whirr the roselia. The dougie is unchanging. The dougie dress the thekla. The roselia is synthetic. The roselia is oblong. The roselia eavesdrop the thekla. If something eavesdrop the roselia and it is unchanging then it is neuroglial. If something eavesdrop the roselia and it whirr the roselia then the roselia eavesdrop the dougie. If something whirr the roselia then it is oblong. If something dress the roselia then the roselia eavesdrop the dougie. If the dougie whirr the thekla then the dougie eavesdrop the roselia. If the dougie dress the roselia and the roselia dress the dougie then the dougie is neuroglial. If something eavesdrop the thekla then it dress the dougie. If something is oblong then it whirr the thekla. The thekla eavesdrop the dougie.", "logic": "\nWhirr(thekla, roselia)\nNeuroglial(thekla)\nUnchanging(thekla)\nEavesdrop(thekla, roselia)\nDress(thekla, dougie)\nDress(thekla, roselia)\nWhirr(dougie, roselia)\nUnchanging(dougie)\nDress(dougie, thekla)\nSynthetic(roselia)\nOblong(roselia)\nEavesdrop(roselia, thekla)\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, roselia) and Unchanging(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, roselia) and Whirr(x, roselia) -> Eavesdrop(roselia, dougie))\nforall x (Whirr(x, roselia) -> Oblong(x))\nforall x (Dress(x, roselia) -> Eavesdrop(roselia, dougie))\nWhirr(dougie, thekla) -> Eavesdrop(dougie, roselia)\nDress(dougie, roselia) and Dress(roselia, dougie) -> Neuroglial(dougie)\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, thekla) -> Dress(x, dougie))\nforall x (Oblong(x) -> Whirr(x, thekla))\n\nEavesdrop(thekla, dougie)\n\nEavesdrop(thekla, dougie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1558"} {"premises": "The meagan is piscine. The winnifred succour the meagan. The levy succour the winnifred. If someone is piscine then they chase the meagan. If someone is unavailing then they do not chase the meagan. If someone is eleventh then they chase the winnifred. If someone is breathed and they do not eat the meagan then the meagan does not see the winnifred. If the levy is breathed then the levy succour the winnifred. If someone wench the meagan then the meagan wench the winnifred. If someone wench the winnifred then the winnifred does not see the levy. If someone succour the meagan then the meagan succour the levy. The meagan is piscine.", "logic": "\nPiscine(meagan)\nSuccour(winnifred, meagan)\nSuccour(levy, winnifred)\nforall x (Piscine(x) -> Wench(x, meagan))\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> not Wench(x, meagan))\nforall x (Eleventh(x) -> Wench(x, winnifred))\nforall x (Breathed(x) and not Succour(x, meagan) -> not Pounce(meagan, winnifred))\nBreathed(levy) -> Succour(levy, winnifred)\nforall x (Wench(x, meagan) -> Wench(meagan, winnifred))\nforall x (Wench(x, winnifred) -> not Pounce(winnifred, levy))\nforall x (Succour(x, meagan) -> Succour(meagan, levy))\n\nPiscine(meagan)\n\ntherefore Piscine(meagan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The noel is aroid. The lissi evangelise the noel. The caitlin evangelise the lissi. If someone is aroid then they chase the noel. If someone is visceral then they do not chase the noel. If someone is raging then they chase the lissi. If someone is indefinite and they do not eat the noel then the noel does not see the lissi. If the caitlin is indefinite then the caitlin evangelise the lissi. If someone operate the noel then the noel operate the lissi. If someone operate the lissi then the lissi does not see the caitlin. If someone evangelise the noel then the noel evangelise the caitlin. The caitlin does not eat the lissi.", "logic": "\nAroid(noel)\nEvangelise(lissi, noel)\nEvangelise(caitlin, lissi)\nforall x (Aroid(x) -> Operate(x, noel))\nforall x (Visceral(x) -> not Operate(x, noel))\nforall x (Raging(x) -> Operate(x, lissi))\nforall x (Indefinite(x) and not Evangelise(x, noel) -> not Paralyse(noel, lissi))\nIndefinite(caitlin) -> Evangelise(caitlin, lissi)\nforall x (Operate(x, noel) -> Operate(noel, lissi))\nforall x (Operate(x, lissi) -> not Paralyse(lissi, caitlin))\nforall x (Evangelise(x, noel) -> Evangelise(noel, caitlin))\n\nnot Evangelise(caitlin, lissi)\n\ntherefore Evangelise(caitlin, lissi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The deloria is dreamless. The clair accredit the deloria. The selby accredit the clair. If someone is dreamless then they chase the deloria. If someone is actuated then they do not chase the deloria. If someone is unattended then they chase the clair. If someone is lateral and they do not eat the deloria then the deloria does not see the clair. If the selby is lateral then the selby accredit the clair. If someone ebonize the deloria then the deloria ebonize the clair. If someone ebonize the clair then the clair does not see the selby. If someone accredit the deloria then the deloria accredit the selby. The deloria ebonize the deloria.", "logic": "\nDreamless(deloria)\nAccredit(clair, deloria)\nAccredit(selby, clair)\nforall x (Dreamless(x) -> Ebonize(x, deloria))\nforall x (Actuated(x) -> not Ebonize(x, deloria))\nforall x (Unattended(x) -> Ebonize(x, clair))\nforall x (Lateral(x) and not Accredit(x, deloria) -> not Interpret(deloria, clair))\nLateral(selby) -> Accredit(selby, clair)\nforall x (Ebonize(x, deloria) -> Ebonize(deloria, clair))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, clair) -> not Interpret(clair, selby))\nforall x (Accredit(x, deloria) -> Accredit(deloria, selby))\n\nEbonize(deloria, deloria)\n\nDreamless(deloria) and forall x (Dreamless(x) -> Ebonize(x, deloria)) -> therefore Ebonize(deloria, deloria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The sher is intruding. The odella postulate the sher. The clemente postulate the odella. If someone is intruding then they chase the sher. If someone is trusty then they do not chase the sher. If someone is posed then they chase the odella. If someone is percussive and they do not eat the sher then the sher does not see the odella. If the clemente is percussive then the clemente postulate the odella. If someone lyophilise the sher then the sher lyophilise the odella. If someone lyophilise the odella then the odella does not see the clemente. If someone postulate the sher then the sher postulate the clemente. The sher does not eat the clemente.", "logic": "\nIntruding(sher)\nPostulate(odella, sher)\nPostulate(clemente, odella)\nforall x (Intruding(x) -> Lyophilise(x, sher))\nforall x (Trusty(x) -> not Lyophilise(x, sher))\nforall x (Posed(x) -> Lyophilise(x, odella))\nforall x (Percussive(x) and not Postulate(x, sher) -> not Eavesdrop(sher, odella))\nPercussive(clemente) -> Postulate(clemente, odella)\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, sher) -> Lyophilise(sher, odella))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, odella) -> not Eavesdrop(odella, clemente))\nforall x (Postulate(x, sher) -> Postulate(sher, clemente))\n\nnot Postulate(sher, clemente)\n\nPostulate(odella, sher) and forall x (Postulate(x, sher) -> Postulate(sher, clemente)) -> therefore Postulate(sher, clemente)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The gertrude is camphoric. The franz abominate the gertrude. The caresse abominate the franz. If someone is camphoric then they chase the gertrude. If someone is gentile then they do not chase the gertrude. If someone is stable then they chase the franz. If someone is nonnative and they do not eat the gertrude then the gertrude does not see the franz. If the caresse is nonnative then the caresse abominate the franz. If someone light the gertrude then the gertrude light the franz. If someone light the franz then the franz does not see the caresse. If someone abominate the gertrude then the gertrude abominate the caresse. The gertrude light the franz.", "logic": "\nCamphoric(gertrude)\nAbominate(franz, gertrude)\nAbominate(caresse, franz)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Light(x, gertrude))\nforall x (Gentile(x) -> not Light(x, gertrude))\nforall x (Stable(x) -> Light(x, franz))\nforall x (Nonnative(x) and not Abominate(x, gertrude) -> not Whistle(gertrude, franz))\nNonnative(caresse) -> Abominate(caresse, franz)\nforall x (Light(x, gertrude) -> Light(gertrude, franz))\nforall x (Light(x, franz) -> not Whistle(franz, caresse))\nforall x (Abominate(x, gertrude) -> Abominate(gertrude, caresse))\n\nLight(gertrude, franz)\n\nCamphoric(gertrude) and forall x (Camphoric(x) -> Light(x, gertrude)) -> therefore Light(gertrude, gertrude) Light(gertrude, gertrude) and forall x (Light(x, gertrude) -> Light(gertrude, franz)) -> therefore Light(gertrude, franz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The luigi is curable. The aeriel retrofit the luigi. The katherina retrofit the aeriel. If someone is curable then they chase the luigi. If someone is conjoined then they do not chase the luigi. If someone is braggy then they chase the aeriel. If someone is benumbed and they do not eat the luigi then the luigi does not see the aeriel. If the katherina is benumbed then the katherina retrofit the aeriel. If someone collocate the luigi then the luigi collocate the aeriel. If someone collocate the aeriel then the aeriel does not see the katherina. If someone retrofit the luigi then the luigi retrofit the katherina. The luigi does not chase the aeriel.", "logic": "\nCurable(luigi)\nRetrofit(aeriel, luigi)\nRetrofit(katherina, aeriel)\nforall x (Curable(x) -> Collocate(x, luigi))\nforall x (Conjoined(x) -> not Collocate(x, luigi))\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Collocate(x, aeriel))\nforall x (Benumbed(x) and not Retrofit(x, luigi) -> not Dope(luigi, aeriel))\nBenumbed(katherina) -> Retrofit(katherina, aeriel)\nforall x (Collocate(x, luigi) -> Collocate(luigi, aeriel))\nforall x (Collocate(x, aeriel) -> not Dope(aeriel, katherina))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, luigi) -> Retrofit(luigi, katherina))\n\nnot Collocate(luigi, aeriel)\n\nCurable(luigi) and forall x (Curable(x) -> Collocate(x, luigi)) -> therefore Collocate(luigi, luigi) Collocate(luigi, luigi) and forall x (Collocate(x, luigi) -> Collocate(luigi, aeriel)) -> therefore Collocate(luigi, aeriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The dehlia is screwball. The slade fiddle the dehlia. The curtice fiddle the slade. If someone is screwball then they chase the dehlia. If someone is solemn then they do not chase the dehlia. If someone is womanlike then they chase the slade. If someone is immoderate and they do not eat the dehlia then the dehlia does not see the slade. If the curtice is immoderate then the curtice fiddle the slade. If someone jitterbug the dehlia then the dehlia jitterbug the slade. If someone jitterbug the slade then the slade does not see the curtice. If someone fiddle the dehlia then the dehlia fiddle the curtice. The slade does not see the curtice.", "logic": "\nScrewball(dehlia)\nFiddle(slade, dehlia)\nFiddle(curtice, slade)\nforall x (Screwball(x) -> Jitterbug(x, dehlia))\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> not Jitterbug(x, dehlia))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) -> Jitterbug(x, slade))\nforall x (Immoderate(x) and not Fiddle(x, dehlia) -> not Homer(dehlia, slade))\nImmoderate(curtice) -> Fiddle(curtice, slade)\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, dehlia) -> Jitterbug(dehlia, slade))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, slade) -> not Homer(slade, curtice))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, dehlia) -> Fiddle(dehlia, curtice))\n\nnot Homer(slade, curtice)\n\nScrewball(dehlia) and forall x (Screwball(x) -> Jitterbug(x, dehlia)) -> therefore Jitterbug(dehlia, dehlia) Jitterbug(dehlia, dehlia) and forall x (Jitterbug(x, dehlia) -> Jitterbug(dehlia, slade)) -> therefore Jitterbug(dehlia, slade) Jitterbug(dehlia, slade) and forall x (Jitterbug(x, slade) -> not Homer(slade, curtice)) -> therefore not Homer(slade, curtice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The hart is sprigged. The molly draught the hart. The amity draught the molly. If someone is sprigged then they chase the hart. If someone is sulphurous then they do not chase the hart. If someone is pilose then they chase the molly. If someone is steadying and they do not eat the hart then the hart does not see the molly. If the amity is steadying then the amity draught the molly. If someone mist the hart then the hart mist the molly. If someone mist the molly then the molly does not see the amity. If someone draught the hart then the hart draught the amity. The molly understudy the amity.", "logic": "\nSprigged(hart)\nDraught(molly, hart)\nDraught(amity, molly)\nforall x (Sprigged(x) -> Mist(x, hart))\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) -> not Mist(x, hart))\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Mist(x, molly))\nforall x (Steadying(x) and not Draught(x, hart) -> not Understudy(hart, molly))\nSteadying(amity) -> Draught(amity, molly)\nforall x (Mist(x, hart) -> Mist(hart, molly))\nforall x (Mist(x, molly) -> not Understudy(molly, amity))\nforall x (Draught(x, hart) -> Draught(hart, amity))\n\nUnderstudy(molly, amity)\n\nSprigged(hart) and forall x (Sprigged(x) -> Mist(x, hart)) -> therefore Mist(hart, hart) Mist(hart, hart) and forall x (Mist(x, hart) -> Mist(hart, molly)) -> therefore Mist(hart, molly) Mist(hart, molly) and forall x (Mist(x, molly) -> not Understudy(molly, amity)) -> therefore not Understudy(molly, amity)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The luna is slipshod. The dot cinematise the luna. The moreen cinematise the dot. If someone is slipshod then they chase the luna. If someone is larghetto then they do not chase the luna. If someone is gyral then they chase the dot. If someone is ductless and they do not eat the luna then the luna does not see the dot. If the moreen is ductless then the moreen cinematise the dot. If someone teargas the luna then the luna teargas the dot. If someone teargas the dot then the dot does not see the moreen. If someone cinematise the luna then the luna cinematise the moreen. The moreen does not chase the luna.", "logic": "\nSlipshod(luna)\nCinematise(dot, luna)\nCinematise(moreen, dot)\nforall x (Slipshod(x) -> Teargas(x, luna))\nforall x (Larghetto(x) -> not Teargas(x, luna))\nforall x (Gyral(x) -> Teargas(x, dot))\nforall x (Ductless(x) and not Cinematise(x, luna) -> not Ward(luna, dot))\nDuctless(moreen) -> Cinematise(moreen, dot)\nforall x (Teargas(x, luna) -> Teargas(luna, dot))\nforall x (Teargas(x, dot) -> not Ward(dot, moreen))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, luna) -> Cinematise(luna, moreen))\n\nnot Teargas(moreen, luna)\n\nforall x (Slipshod(x) -> Teargas(x, luna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The diego is referent. The katya immunise the diego. The zora immunise the katya. If someone is referent then they chase the diego. If someone is malapropos then they do not chase the diego. If someone is braided then they chase the katya. If someone is diatomic and they do not eat the diego then the diego does not see the katya. If the zora is diatomic then the zora immunise the katya. If someone wink the diego then the diego wink the katya. If someone wink the katya then the katya does not see the zora. If someone immunise the diego then the diego immunise the zora. The zora wink the katya.", "logic": "\nReferent(diego)\nImmunise(katya, diego)\nImmunise(zora, katya)\nforall x (Referent(x) -> Wink(x, diego))\nforall x (Malapropos(x) -> not Wink(x, diego))\nforall x (Braided(x) -> Wink(x, katya))\nforall x (Diatomic(x) and not Immunise(x, diego) -> not Cosh(diego, katya))\nDiatomic(zora) -> Immunise(zora, katya)\nforall x (Wink(x, diego) -> Wink(diego, katya))\nforall x (Wink(x, katya) -> not Cosh(katya, zora))\nforall x (Immunise(x, diego) -> Immunise(diego, zora))\n\nWink(zora, katya)\n\nforall x (Braided(x) -> Wink(x, katya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The chas is cordate. The leonore lyophilise the chas. The duffie lyophilise the leonore. If someone is cordate then they chase the chas. If someone is lite then they do not chase the chas. If someone is penetrable then they chase the leonore. If someone is repressing and they do not eat the chas then the chas does not see the leonore. If the duffie is repressing then the duffie lyophilise the leonore. If someone occur the chas then the chas occur the leonore. If someone occur the leonore then the leonore does not see the duffie. If someone lyophilise the chas then the chas lyophilise the duffie. The leonore does not chase the chas.", "logic": "\nCordate(chas)\nLyophilise(leonore, chas)\nLyophilise(duffie, leonore)\nforall x (Cordate(x) -> Occur(x, chas))\nforall x (Lite(x) -> not Occur(x, chas))\nforall x (Penetrable(x) -> Occur(x, leonore))\nforall x (Repressing(x) and not Lyophilise(x, chas) -> not Dislocate(chas, leonore))\nRepressing(duffie) -> Lyophilise(duffie, leonore)\nforall x (Occur(x, chas) -> Occur(chas, leonore))\nforall x (Occur(x, leonore) -> not Dislocate(leonore, duffie))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, chas) -> Lyophilise(chas, duffie))\n\nnot Occur(leonore, chas)\n\nforall x (Cordate(x) -> Occur(x, chas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The maddie is dogged. The rollins polemise the maddie. The esmaria polemise the rollins. If someone is dogged then they chase the maddie. If someone is outbound then they do not chase the maddie. If someone is grizzly then they chase the rollins. If someone is lumbering and they do not eat the maddie then the maddie does not see the rollins. If the esmaria is lumbering then the esmaria polemise the rollins. If someone collapse the maddie then the maddie collapse the rollins. If someone collapse the rollins then the rollins does not see the esmaria. If someone polemise the maddie then the maddie polemise the esmaria. The rollins collapse the rollins.", "logic": "\nDogged(maddie)\nPolemise(rollins, maddie)\nPolemise(esmaria, rollins)\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Collapse(x, maddie))\nforall x (Outbound(x) -> not Collapse(x, maddie))\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> Collapse(x, rollins))\nforall x (Lumbering(x) and not Polemise(x, maddie) -> not Overcloud(maddie, rollins))\nLumbering(esmaria) -> Polemise(esmaria, rollins)\nforall x (Collapse(x, maddie) -> Collapse(maddie, rollins))\nforall x (Collapse(x, rollins) -> not Overcloud(rollins, esmaria))\nforall x (Polemise(x, maddie) -> Polemise(maddie, esmaria))\n\nCollapse(rollins, rollins)\n\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> Collapse(x, rollins)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The wilone is lugubrious. The purcell caponize the wilone. The colbert caponize the purcell. If someone is lugubrious then they chase the wilone. If someone is unshelled then they do not chase the wilone. If someone is aluminous then they chase the purcell. If someone is ghostly and they do not eat the wilone then the wilone does not see the purcell. If the colbert is ghostly then the colbert caponize the purcell. If someone limit the wilone then the wilone limit the purcell. If someone limit the purcell then the purcell does not see the colbert. If someone caponize the wilone then the wilone caponize the colbert. The colbert is not unshelled.", "logic": "\nLugubrious(wilone)\nCaponize(purcell, wilone)\nCaponize(colbert, purcell)\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> Limit(x, wilone))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) -> not Limit(x, wilone))\nforall x (Aluminous(x) -> Limit(x, purcell))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) and not Caponize(x, wilone) -> not Corkscrew(wilone, purcell))\nGhostly(colbert) -> Caponize(colbert, purcell)\nforall x (Limit(x, wilone) -> Limit(wilone, purcell))\nforall x (Limit(x, purcell) -> not Corkscrew(purcell, colbert))\nforall x (Caponize(x, wilone) -> Caponize(wilone, colbert))\n\nnot Unshelled(colbert)\n\nnot Unshelled(colbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The maxwell is hominal. The gasper disprove the maxwell. The dorcas disprove the gasper. If someone is hominal then they chase the maxwell. If someone is attachable then they do not chase the maxwell. If someone is expository then they chase the gasper. If someone is ivied and they do not eat the maxwell then the maxwell does not see the gasper. If the dorcas is ivied then the dorcas disprove the gasper. If someone guttle the maxwell then the maxwell guttle the gasper. If someone guttle the gasper then the gasper does not see the dorcas. If someone disprove the maxwell then the maxwell disprove the dorcas. The gasper disk the gasper.", "logic": "\nHominal(maxwell)\nDisprove(gasper, maxwell)\nDisprove(dorcas, gasper)\nforall x (Hominal(x) -> Guttle(x, maxwell))\nforall x (Attachable(x) -> not Guttle(x, maxwell))\nforall x (Expository(x) -> Guttle(x, gasper))\nforall x (Ivied(x) and not Disprove(x, maxwell) -> not Disk(maxwell, gasper))\nIvied(dorcas) -> Disprove(dorcas, gasper)\nforall x (Guttle(x, maxwell) -> Guttle(maxwell, gasper))\nforall x (Guttle(x, gasper) -> not Disk(gasper, dorcas))\nforall x (Disprove(x, maxwell) -> Disprove(maxwell, dorcas))\n\nDisk(gasper, gasper)\n\nDisk(gasper, gasper) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The adrea is wobbling. The dorthea lubricate the adrea. The kym lubricate the dorthea. If someone is wobbling then they chase the adrea. If someone is armlike then they do not chase the adrea. If someone is sinful then they chase the dorthea. If someone is spinous and they do not eat the adrea then the adrea does not see the dorthea. If the kym is spinous then the kym lubricate the dorthea. If someone embrittle the adrea then the adrea embrittle the dorthea. If someone embrittle the dorthea then the dorthea does not see the kym. If someone lubricate the adrea then the adrea lubricate the kym. The kym does not eat the kym.", "logic": "\nWobbling(adrea)\nLubricate(dorthea, adrea)\nLubricate(kym, dorthea)\nforall x (Wobbling(x) -> Embrittle(x, adrea))\nforall x (Armlike(x) -> not Embrittle(x, adrea))\nforall x (Sinful(x) -> Embrittle(x, dorthea))\nforall x (Spinous(x) and not Lubricate(x, adrea) -> not Sellotape(adrea, dorthea))\nSpinous(kym) -> Lubricate(kym, dorthea)\nforall x (Embrittle(x, adrea) -> Embrittle(adrea, dorthea))\nforall x (Embrittle(x, dorthea) -> not Sellotape(dorthea, kym))\nforall x (Lubricate(x, adrea) -> Lubricate(adrea, kym))\n\nnot Lubricate(kym, kym)\n\nnot Lubricate(kym, kym) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "The stefa is asterisked. The stepha relive the stefa. The joy relive the stepha. If someone is asterisked then they chase the stefa. If someone is blissful then they do not chase the stefa. If someone is ironed then they chase the stepha. If someone is vanished and they do not eat the stefa then the stefa does not see the stepha. If the joy is vanished then the joy relive the stepha. If someone underrate the stefa then the stefa underrate the stepha. If someone underrate the stepha then the stepha does not see the joy. If someone relive the stefa then the stefa relive the joy. The stepha is round.", "logic": "\nAsterisked(stefa)\nRelive(stepha, stefa)\nRelive(joy, stepha)\nforall x (Asterisked(x) -> Underrate(x, stefa))\nforall x (Blissful(x) -> not Underrate(x, stefa))\nforall x (Ironed(x) -> Underrate(x, stepha))\nforall x (Vanished(x) and not Relive(x, stefa) -> not Exclude(stefa, stepha))\nVanished(joy) -> Relive(joy, stepha)\nforall x (Underrate(x, stefa) -> Underrate(stefa, stepha))\nforall x (Underrate(x, stepha) -> not Exclude(stepha, joy))\nforall x (Relive(x, stefa) -> Relive(stefa, joy))\n\nRound(stepha)\n\nRound(stepha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1541"} {"premises": "Jerrylee is gassy. Jerrylee is opposable. Tito is submersed. Tito is gassy. Tito is grievous. Tito is opposable. Tito is romanic. Marti is combative. Marti is gassy. Marti is grievous. Marti is romanic. Netti is gassy. Netti is grievous. Netti is analytical. Netti is opposable. Netti is romanic. All romanic people are analytical. All gassy people are combative. All grievous, gassy people are romanic. All combative people are grievous. If Tito is gassy and Tito is not romanic then Tito is submersed. If Tito is not analytical and Tito is not romanic then Tito is not opposable. Tito is romanic.", "logic": "\nGassy(jerrylee)\nOpposable(jerrylee)\nSubmersed(tito)\nGassy(tito)\nGrievous(tito)\nOpposable(tito)\nRomanic(tito)\nCombative(marti)\nGassy(marti)\nGrievous(marti)\nRomanic(marti)\nGassy(netti)\nGrievous(netti)\nAnalytical(netti)\nOpposable(netti)\nRomanic(netti)\nforall x (Romanic(x) -> Analytical(x))\nforall x (Gassy(x) -> Combative(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Gassy(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Combative(x) -> Grievous(x))\nGassy(tito) and not Romanic(tito) -> Submersed(tito)\nnot Analytical(tito) and not Romanic(tito) -> not Opposable(tito)\n\nRomanic(tito)\n\ntherefore Romanic(tito)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Jere is unsugared. Jere is frontal. Curt is nonchalant. Curt is unsugared. Curt is saline. Curt is frontal. Curt is advisory. Eugene is ritardando. Eugene is unsugared. Eugene is saline. Eugene is advisory. Patricia is unsugared. Patricia is saline. Patricia is eldest. Patricia is frontal. Patricia is advisory. All advisory people are eldest. All unsugared people are ritardando. All saline, unsugared people are advisory. All ritardando people are saline. If Curt is unsugared and Curt is not advisory then Curt is nonchalant. If Curt is not eldest and Curt is not advisory then Curt is not frontal. Eugene is not ritardando.", "logic": "\nUnsugared(jere)\nFrontal(jere)\nNonchalant(curt)\nUnsugared(curt)\nSaline(curt)\nFrontal(curt)\nAdvisory(curt)\nRitardando(eugene)\nUnsugared(eugene)\nSaline(eugene)\nAdvisory(eugene)\nUnsugared(patricia)\nSaline(patricia)\nEldest(patricia)\nFrontal(patricia)\nAdvisory(patricia)\nforall x (Advisory(x) -> Eldest(x))\nforall x (Unsugared(x) -> Ritardando(x))\nforall x (Saline(x) and Unsugared(x) -> Advisory(x))\nforall x (Ritardando(x) -> Saline(x))\nUnsugared(curt) and not Advisory(curt) -> Nonchalant(curt)\nnot Eldest(curt) and not Advisory(curt) -> not Frontal(curt)\n\nnot Ritardando(eugene)\n\ntherefore Ritardando(eugene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Sharie is dissident. Sharie is haploid. Emanuel is unarmoured. Emanuel is dissident. Emanuel is storeyed. Emanuel is haploid. Emanuel is convolute. August is lengthways. August is dissident. August is storeyed. August is convolute. Heda is dissident. Heda is storeyed. Heda is upcurved. Heda is haploid. Heda is convolute. All convolute people are upcurved. All dissident people are lengthways. All storeyed, dissident people are convolute. All lengthways people are storeyed. If Emanuel is dissident and Emanuel is not convolute then Emanuel is unarmoured. If Emanuel is not upcurved and Emanuel is not convolute then Emanuel is not haploid. August is upcurved.", "logic": "\nDissident(sharie)\nHaploid(sharie)\nUnarmoured(emanuel)\nDissident(emanuel)\nStoreyed(emanuel)\nHaploid(emanuel)\nConvolute(emanuel)\nLengthways(august)\nDissident(august)\nStoreyed(august)\nConvolute(august)\nDissident(heda)\nStoreyed(heda)\nUpcurved(heda)\nHaploid(heda)\nConvolute(heda)\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Dissident(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Storeyed(x) and Dissident(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) -> Storeyed(x))\nDissident(emanuel) and not Convolute(emanuel) -> Unarmoured(emanuel)\nnot Upcurved(emanuel) and not Convolute(emanuel) -> not Haploid(emanuel)\n\nUpcurved(august)\n\nConvolute(august) and forall x (Convolute(x) -> Upcurved(x)) -> therefore Upcurved(august)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Alexina is ochre. Alexina is autocratic. Garfield is polychrome. Garfield is ochre. Garfield is dyspneic. Garfield is autocratic. Garfield is ineligible. Odelle is insured. Odelle is ochre. Odelle is dyspneic. Odelle is ineligible. Siward is ochre. Siward is dyspneic. Siward is residuary. Siward is autocratic. Siward is ineligible. All ineligible people are residuary. All ochre people are insured. All dyspneic, ochre people are ineligible. All insured people are dyspneic. If Garfield is ochre and Garfield is not ineligible then Garfield is polychrome. If Garfield is not residuary and Garfield is not ineligible then Garfield is not autocratic. Odelle is not residuary.", "logic": "\nOchre(alexina)\nAutocratic(alexina)\nPolychrome(garfield)\nOchre(garfield)\nDyspneic(garfield)\nAutocratic(garfield)\nIneligible(garfield)\nInsured(odelle)\nOchre(odelle)\nDyspneic(odelle)\nIneligible(odelle)\nOchre(siward)\nDyspneic(siward)\nResiduary(siward)\nAutocratic(siward)\nIneligible(siward)\nforall x (Ineligible(x) -> Residuary(x))\nforall x (Ochre(x) -> Insured(x))\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) and Ochre(x) -> Ineligible(x))\nforall x (Insured(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nOchre(garfield) and not Ineligible(garfield) -> Polychrome(garfield)\nnot Residuary(garfield) and not Ineligible(garfield) -> not Autocratic(garfield)\n\nnot Residuary(odelle)\n\nIneligible(odelle) and forall x (Ineligible(x) -> Residuary(x)) -> therefore Residuary(odelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Tabbi is calyptrate. Tabbi is absent. Elle is nonionic. Elle is calyptrate. Elle is continual. Elle is absent. Elle is uninjured. Elvis is bichrome. Elvis is calyptrate. Elvis is continual. Elvis is uninjured. Justin is calyptrate. Justin is continual. Justin is external. Justin is absent. Justin is uninjured. All uninjured people are external. All calyptrate people are bichrome. All continual, calyptrate people are uninjured. All bichrome people are continual. If Elle is calyptrate and Elle is not uninjured then Elle is nonionic. If Elle is not external and Elle is not uninjured then Elle is not absent. Tabbi is continual.", "logic": "\nCalyptrate(tabbi)\nAbsent(tabbi)\nNonionic(elle)\nCalyptrate(elle)\nContinual(elle)\nAbsent(elle)\nUninjured(elle)\nBichrome(elvis)\nCalyptrate(elvis)\nContinual(elvis)\nUninjured(elvis)\nCalyptrate(justin)\nContinual(justin)\nExternal(justin)\nAbsent(justin)\nUninjured(justin)\nforall x (Uninjured(x) -> External(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) -> Bichrome(x))\nforall x (Continual(x) and Calyptrate(x) -> Uninjured(x))\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> Continual(x))\nCalyptrate(elle) and not Uninjured(elle) -> Nonionic(elle)\nnot External(elle) and not Uninjured(elle) -> not Absent(elle)\n\nContinual(tabbi)\n\nCalyptrate(tabbi) and forall x (Calyptrate(x) -> Bichrome(x)) -> therefore Bichrome(tabbi) Bichrome(tabbi) and forall x (Bichrome(x) -> Continual(x)) -> therefore Continual(tabbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Marcile is revengeful. Marcile is swayback. Merissa is mendacious. Merissa is revengeful. Merissa is tertiary. Merissa is swayback. Merissa is icebound. Gerome is shipboard. Gerome is revengeful. Gerome is tertiary. Gerome is icebound. Sile is revengeful. Sile is tertiary. Sile is masculine. Sile is swayback. Sile is icebound. All icebound people are masculine. All revengeful people are shipboard. All tertiary, revengeful people are icebound. All shipboard people are tertiary. If Merissa is revengeful and Merissa is not icebound then Merissa is mendacious. If Merissa is not masculine and Merissa is not icebound then Merissa is not swayback. Marcile is not tertiary.", "logic": "\nRevengeful(marcile)\nSwayback(marcile)\nMendacious(merissa)\nRevengeful(merissa)\nTertiary(merissa)\nSwayback(merissa)\nIcebound(merissa)\nShipboard(gerome)\nRevengeful(gerome)\nTertiary(gerome)\nIcebound(gerome)\nRevengeful(sile)\nTertiary(sile)\nMasculine(sile)\nSwayback(sile)\nIcebound(sile)\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Masculine(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Tertiary(x) and Revengeful(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) -> Tertiary(x))\nRevengeful(merissa) and not Icebound(merissa) -> Mendacious(merissa)\nnot Masculine(merissa) and not Icebound(merissa) -> not Swayback(merissa)\n\nnot Tertiary(marcile)\n\nRevengeful(marcile) and forall x (Revengeful(x) -> Shipboard(x)) -> therefore Shipboard(marcile) Shipboard(marcile) and forall x (Shipboard(x) -> Tertiary(x)) -> therefore Tertiary(marcile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Cleopatra is monodical. Cleopatra is lacelike. Leta is resolved. Leta is monodical. Leta is changeable. Leta is lacelike. Leta is slithering. Jameson is beaked. Jameson is monodical. Jameson is changeable. Jameson is slithering. Abbott is monodical. Abbott is changeable. Abbott is botonnee. Abbott is lacelike. Abbott is slithering. All slithering people are botonnee. All monodical people are beaked. All changeable, monodical people are slithering. All beaked people are changeable. If Leta is monodical and Leta is not slithering then Leta is resolved. If Leta is not botonnee and Leta is not slithering then Leta is not lacelike. Cleopatra is slithering.", "logic": "\nMonodical(cleopatra)\nLacelike(cleopatra)\nResolved(leta)\nMonodical(leta)\nChangeable(leta)\nLacelike(leta)\nSlithering(leta)\nBeaked(jameson)\nMonodical(jameson)\nChangeable(jameson)\nSlithering(jameson)\nMonodical(abbott)\nChangeable(abbott)\nBotonnee(abbott)\nLacelike(abbott)\nSlithering(abbott)\nforall x (Slithering(x) -> Botonnee(x))\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> Beaked(x))\nforall x (Changeable(x) and Monodical(x) -> Slithering(x))\nforall x (Beaked(x) -> Changeable(x))\nMonodical(leta) and not Slithering(leta) -> Resolved(leta)\nnot Botonnee(leta) and not Slithering(leta) -> not Lacelike(leta)\n\nSlithering(cleopatra)\n\nMonodical(cleopatra) and forall x (Monodical(x) -> Beaked(x)) -> therefore Beaked(cleopatra) Beaked(cleopatra) and forall x (Beaked(x) -> Changeable(x)) -> therefore Changeable(cleopatra) Changeable(cleopatra) and Monodical(cleopatra) and forall x (Changeable(x) and Monodical(x) -> Slithering(x)) -> therefore Slithering(cleopatra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Annemarie is acoustical. Annemarie is seditious. Lilian is seductive. Lilian is acoustical. Lilian is applied. Lilian is seditious. Lilian is scatty. Addis is racial. Addis is acoustical. Addis is applied. Addis is scatty. Louise is acoustical. Louise is applied. Louise is thenal. Louise is seditious. Louise is scatty. All scatty people are thenal. All acoustical people are racial. All applied, acoustical people are scatty. All racial people are applied. If Lilian is acoustical and Lilian is not scatty then Lilian is seductive. If Lilian is not thenal and Lilian is not scatty then Lilian is not seditious. Annemarie is not scatty.", "logic": "\nAcoustical(annemarie)\nSeditious(annemarie)\nSeductive(lilian)\nAcoustical(lilian)\nApplied(lilian)\nSeditious(lilian)\nScatty(lilian)\nRacial(addis)\nAcoustical(addis)\nApplied(addis)\nScatty(addis)\nAcoustical(louise)\nApplied(louise)\nThenal(louise)\nSeditious(louise)\nScatty(louise)\nforall x (Scatty(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Acoustical(x) -> Racial(x))\nforall x (Applied(x) and Acoustical(x) -> Scatty(x))\nforall x (Racial(x) -> Applied(x))\nAcoustical(lilian) and not Scatty(lilian) -> Seductive(lilian)\nnot Thenal(lilian) and not Scatty(lilian) -> not Seditious(lilian)\n\nnot Scatty(annemarie)\n\nAcoustical(annemarie) and forall x (Acoustical(x) -> Racial(x)) -> therefore Racial(annemarie) Racial(annemarie) and forall x (Racial(x) -> Applied(x)) -> therefore Applied(annemarie) Applied(annemarie) and Acoustical(annemarie) and forall x (Applied(x) and Acoustical(x) -> Scatty(x)) -> therefore Scatty(annemarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Scot is reduced. Scot is ghostlike. Rowland is ocular. Rowland is reduced. Rowland is valid. Rowland is ghostlike. Rowland is clastic. Nealy is liberated. Nealy is reduced. Nealy is valid. Nealy is clastic. Johnnie is reduced. Johnnie is valid. Johnnie is outlandish. Johnnie is ghostlike. Johnnie is clastic. All clastic people are outlandish. All reduced people are liberated. All valid, reduced people are clastic. All liberated people are valid. If Rowland is reduced and Rowland is not clastic then Rowland is ocular. If Rowland is not outlandish and Rowland is not clastic then Rowland is not ghostlike. Scot is not ocular.", "logic": "\nReduced(scot)\nGhostlike(scot)\nOcular(rowland)\nReduced(rowland)\nValid(rowland)\nGhostlike(rowland)\nClastic(rowland)\nLiberated(nealy)\nReduced(nealy)\nValid(nealy)\nClastic(nealy)\nReduced(johnnie)\nValid(johnnie)\nOutlandish(johnnie)\nGhostlike(johnnie)\nClastic(johnnie)\nforall x (Clastic(x) -> Outlandish(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) -> Liberated(x))\nforall x (Valid(x) and Reduced(x) -> Clastic(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) -> Valid(x))\nReduced(rowland) and not Clastic(rowland) -> Ocular(rowland)\nnot Outlandish(rowland) and not Clastic(rowland) -> not Ghostlike(rowland)\n\nnot Ocular(scot)\n\nnot Ocular(scot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Cynthia is volumed. Cynthia is tributary. Kathryn is prognathic. Kathryn is volumed. Kathryn is acinar. Kathryn is tributary. Kathryn is spavined. Mariele is ungentle. Mariele is volumed. Mariele is acinar. Mariele is spavined. Saba is volumed. Saba is acinar. Saba is axile. Saba is tributary. Saba is spavined. All spavined people are axile. All volumed people are ungentle. All acinar, volumed people are spavined. All ungentle people are acinar. If Kathryn is volumed and Kathryn is not spavined then Kathryn is prognathic. If Kathryn is not axile and Kathryn is not spavined then Kathryn is not tributary. Mariele is tributary.", "logic": "\nVolumed(cynthia)\nTributary(cynthia)\nPrognathic(kathryn)\nVolumed(kathryn)\nAcinar(kathryn)\nTributary(kathryn)\nSpavined(kathryn)\nUngentle(mariele)\nVolumed(mariele)\nAcinar(mariele)\nSpavined(mariele)\nVolumed(saba)\nAcinar(saba)\nAxile(saba)\nTributary(saba)\nSpavined(saba)\nforall x (Spavined(x) -> Axile(x))\nforall x (Volumed(x) -> Ungentle(x))\nforall x (Acinar(x) and Volumed(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) -> Acinar(x))\nVolumed(kathryn) and not Spavined(kathryn) -> Prognathic(kathryn)\nnot Axile(kathryn) and not Spavined(kathryn) -> not Tributary(kathryn)\n\nTributary(mariele)\n\nTributary(mariele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Nellie is delineate. Nellie is still. Rhiamon is pugnacious. Rhiamon is delineate. Rhiamon is beatable. Rhiamon is still. Rhiamon is amebic. Rickard is semisolid. Rickard is delineate. Rickard is beatable. Rickard is amebic. Ellis is delineate. Ellis is beatable. Ellis is maudlin. Ellis is still. Ellis is amebic. All amebic people are maudlin. All delineate people are semisolid. All beatable, delineate people are amebic. All semisolid people are beatable. If Rhiamon is delineate and Rhiamon is not amebic then Rhiamon is pugnacious. If Rhiamon is not maudlin and Rhiamon is not amebic then Rhiamon is not still. Ellis is not pugnacious.", "logic": "\nDelineate(nellie)\nStill(nellie)\nPugnacious(rhiamon)\nDelineate(rhiamon)\nBeatable(rhiamon)\nStill(rhiamon)\nAmebic(rhiamon)\nSemisolid(rickard)\nDelineate(rickard)\nBeatable(rickard)\nAmebic(rickard)\nDelineate(ellis)\nBeatable(ellis)\nMaudlin(ellis)\nStill(ellis)\nAmebic(ellis)\nforall x (Amebic(x) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Delineate(x) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Beatable(x) and Delineate(x) -> Amebic(x))\nforall x (Semisolid(x) -> Beatable(x))\nDelineate(rhiamon) and not Amebic(rhiamon) -> Pugnacious(rhiamon)\nnot Maudlin(rhiamon) and not Amebic(rhiamon) -> not Still(rhiamon)\n\nnot Pugnacious(ellis)\n\nnot Pugnacious(ellis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "Jodee is truculent. Jodee is tending. Shayna is cognizable. Shayna is truculent. Shayna is cyan. Shayna is tending. Shayna is opening. Gelya is entitled. Gelya is truculent. Gelya is cyan. Gelya is opening. Averil is truculent. Averil is cyan. Averil is gloomy. Averil is tending. Averil is opening. All opening people are gloomy. All truculent people are entitled. All cyan, truculent people are opening. All entitled people are cyan. If Shayna is truculent and Shayna is not opening then Shayna is cognizable. If Shayna is not gloomy and Shayna is not opening then Shayna is not tending. Gelya is cognizable.", "logic": "\nTruculent(jodee)\nTending(jodee)\nCognizable(shayna)\nTruculent(shayna)\nCyan(shayna)\nTending(shayna)\nOpening(shayna)\nEntitled(gelya)\nTruculent(gelya)\nCyan(gelya)\nOpening(gelya)\nTruculent(averil)\nCyan(averil)\nGloomy(averil)\nTending(averil)\nOpening(averil)\nforall x (Opening(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) -> Entitled(x))\nforall x (Cyan(x) and Truculent(x) -> Opening(x))\nforall x (Entitled(x) -> Cyan(x))\nTruculent(shayna) and not Opening(shayna) -> Cognizable(shayna)\nnot Gloomy(shayna) and not Opening(shayna) -> not Tending(shayna)\n\nCognizable(gelya)\n\nCognizable(gelya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1118"} {"premises": "The olin is unbordered. The olin garb the juana. The juana torture the olin. The juana treadle the olin. The juana is bearing. The juana is shed. The juana garb the olin. If the olin is anthropic then the olin treadle the juana. If someone is anthropic and they eat the juana then they like the olin. If the olin garb the juana and the juana treadle the olin then the olin torture the juana. If someone is unbordered then they chase the juana. If the juana garb the olin and the olin garb the juana then the juana is bearing. If the olin treadle the juana and the juana treadle the olin then the juana is dismantled. If someone torture the olin and they are bearing then the olin is anthropic. If someone garb the juana and they chase the juana then they chase the olin. The juana is shed.", "logic": "\nUnbordered(olin)\nGarb(olin, juana)\nTorture(juana, olin)\nTreadle(juana, olin)\nBearing(juana)\nShed(juana)\nGarb(juana, olin)\nAnthropic(olin) -> Treadle(olin, juana)\nforall x (Anthropic(x) and Treadle(x, juana) -> Garb(x, olin))\nGarb(olin, juana) and Treadle(juana, olin) -> Torture(olin, juana)\nforall x (Unbordered(x) -> Torture(x, juana))\nGarb(juana, olin) and Garb(olin, juana) -> Bearing(juana)\nTreadle(olin, juana) and Treadle(juana, olin) -> Dismantled(juana)\nforall x (Torture(x, olin) and Bearing(x) -> Anthropic(olin))\nforall x (Garb(x, juana) and Torture(x, juana) -> Torture(x, olin))\n\nShed(juana)\n\ntherefore Shed(juana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The teri is iranian. The teri consummate the thomas. The thomas film the teri. The thomas educate the teri. The thomas is important. The thomas is slurred. The thomas consummate the teri. If the teri is gangrenous then the teri educate the thomas. If someone is gangrenous and they eat the thomas then they like the teri. If the teri consummate the thomas and the thomas educate the teri then the teri film the thomas. If someone is iranian then they chase the thomas. If the thomas consummate the teri and the teri consummate the thomas then the thomas is important. If the teri educate the thomas and the thomas educate the teri then the thomas is stubbled. If someone film the teri and they are important then the teri is gangrenous. If someone consummate the thomas and they chase the thomas then they chase the teri. The teri does not like the thomas.", "logic": "\nIranian(teri)\nConsummate(teri, thomas)\nFilm(thomas, teri)\nEducate(thomas, teri)\nImportant(thomas)\nSlurred(thomas)\nConsummate(thomas, teri)\nGangrenous(teri) -> Educate(teri, thomas)\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) and Educate(x, thomas) -> Consummate(x, teri))\nConsummate(teri, thomas) and Educate(thomas, teri) -> Film(teri, thomas)\nforall x (Iranian(x) -> Film(x, thomas))\nConsummate(thomas, teri) and Consummate(teri, thomas) -> Important(thomas)\nEducate(teri, thomas) and Educate(thomas, teri) -> Stubbled(thomas)\nforall x (Film(x, teri) and Important(x) -> Gangrenous(teri))\nforall x (Consummate(x, thomas) and Film(x, thomas) -> Film(x, teri))\n\nnot Consummate(teri, thomas)\n\ntherefore Consummate(teri, thomas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The corena is latin. The corena reconsider the kalinda. The kalinda forge the corena. The kalinda speckle the corena. The kalinda is masculine. The kalinda is zygodactyl. The kalinda reconsider the corena. If the corena is coltish then the corena speckle the kalinda. If someone is coltish and they eat the kalinda then they like the corena. If the corena reconsider the kalinda and the kalinda speckle the corena then the corena forge the kalinda. If someone is latin then they chase the kalinda. If the kalinda reconsider the corena and the corena reconsider the kalinda then the kalinda is masculine. If the corena speckle the kalinda and the kalinda speckle the corena then the kalinda is pleochroic. If someone forge the corena and they are masculine then the corena is coltish. If someone reconsider the kalinda and they chase the kalinda then they chase the corena. The corena is coltish.", "logic": "\nLatin(corena)\nReconsider(corena, kalinda)\nForge(kalinda, corena)\nSpeckle(kalinda, corena)\nMasculine(kalinda)\nZygodactyl(kalinda)\nReconsider(kalinda, corena)\nColtish(corena) -> Speckle(corena, kalinda)\nforall x (Coltish(x) and Speckle(x, kalinda) -> Reconsider(x, corena))\nReconsider(corena, kalinda) and Speckle(kalinda, corena) -> Forge(corena, kalinda)\nforall x (Latin(x) -> Forge(x, kalinda))\nReconsider(kalinda, corena) and Reconsider(corena, kalinda) -> Masculine(kalinda)\nSpeckle(corena, kalinda) and Speckle(kalinda, corena) -> Pleochroic(kalinda)\nforall x (Forge(x, corena) and Masculine(x) -> Coltish(corena))\nforall x (Reconsider(x, kalinda) and Forge(x, kalinda) -> Forge(x, corena))\n\nColtish(corena)\n\nForge(kalinda, corena) and Masculine(kalinda) and forall x (Forge(x, corena) and Masculine(x) -> Coltish(corena)) -> therefore Coltish(corena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The kimbra is asynergic. The kimbra rely the euphemia. The euphemia carpet the kimbra. The euphemia whack the kimbra. The euphemia is mormon. The euphemia is jesuitical. The euphemia rely the kimbra. If the kimbra is malcontent then the kimbra whack the euphemia. If someone is malcontent and they eat the euphemia then they like the kimbra. If the kimbra rely the euphemia and the euphemia whack the kimbra then the kimbra carpet the euphemia. If someone is asynergic then they chase the euphemia. If the euphemia rely the kimbra and the kimbra rely the euphemia then the euphemia is mormon. If the kimbra whack the euphemia and the euphemia whack the kimbra then the euphemia is leaky. If someone carpet the kimbra and they are mormon then the kimbra is malcontent. If someone rely the euphemia and they chase the euphemia then they chase the kimbra. The kimbra does not chase the euphemia.", "logic": "\nAsynergic(kimbra)\nRely(kimbra, euphemia)\nCarpet(euphemia, kimbra)\nWhack(euphemia, kimbra)\nMormon(euphemia)\nJesuitical(euphemia)\nRely(euphemia, kimbra)\nMalcontent(kimbra) -> Whack(kimbra, euphemia)\nforall x (Malcontent(x) and Whack(x, euphemia) -> Rely(x, kimbra))\nRely(kimbra, euphemia) and Whack(euphemia, kimbra) -> Carpet(kimbra, euphemia)\nforall x (Asynergic(x) -> Carpet(x, euphemia))\nRely(euphemia, kimbra) and Rely(kimbra, euphemia) -> Mormon(euphemia)\nWhack(kimbra, euphemia) and Whack(euphemia, kimbra) -> Leaky(euphemia)\nforall x (Carpet(x, kimbra) and Mormon(x) -> Malcontent(kimbra))\nforall x (Rely(x, euphemia) and Carpet(x, euphemia) -> Carpet(x, kimbra))\n\nnot Carpet(kimbra, euphemia)\n\nAsynergic(kimbra) and forall x (Asynergic(x) -> Carpet(x, euphemia)) -> therefore Carpet(kimbra, euphemia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The michal is chiasmic. The michal virilize the felice. The felice cone the michal. The felice divaricate the michal. The felice is orthopedic. The felice is cyprinid. The felice virilize the michal. If the michal is prominent then the michal divaricate the felice. If someone is prominent and they eat the felice then they like the michal. If the michal virilize the felice and the felice divaricate the michal then the michal cone the felice. If someone is chiasmic then they chase the felice. If the felice virilize the michal and the michal virilize the felice then the felice is orthopedic. If the michal divaricate the felice and the felice divaricate the michal then the felice is unthawed. If someone cone the michal and they are orthopedic then the michal is prominent. If someone virilize the felice and they chase the felice then they chase the michal. The michal divaricate the felice.", "logic": "\nChiasmic(michal)\nVirilize(michal, felice)\nCone(felice, michal)\nDivaricate(felice, michal)\nOrthopedic(felice)\nCyprinid(felice)\nVirilize(felice, michal)\nProminent(michal) -> Divaricate(michal, felice)\nforall x (Prominent(x) and Divaricate(x, felice) -> Virilize(x, michal))\nVirilize(michal, felice) and Divaricate(felice, michal) -> Cone(michal, felice)\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Cone(x, felice))\nVirilize(felice, michal) and Virilize(michal, felice) -> Orthopedic(felice)\nDivaricate(michal, felice) and Divaricate(felice, michal) -> Unthawed(felice)\nforall x (Cone(x, michal) and Orthopedic(x) -> Prominent(michal))\nforall x (Virilize(x, felice) and Cone(x, felice) -> Cone(x, michal))\n\nDivaricate(michal, felice)\n\nCone(felice, michal) and Orthopedic(felice) and forall x (Cone(x, michal) and Orthopedic(x) -> Prominent(michal)) -> therefore Prominent(michal) Prominent(michal) and Prominent(michal) -> Divaricate(michal, felice) -> therefore Divaricate(michal, felice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The roch is unfueled. The roch secrete the ede. The ede disinter the roch. The ede teleport the roch. The ede is unusable. The ede is tenth. The ede secrete the roch. If the roch is avaricious then the roch teleport the ede. If someone is avaricious and they eat the ede then they like the roch. If the roch secrete the ede and the ede teleport the roch then the roch disinter the ede. If someone is unfueled then they chase the ede. If the ede secrete the roch and the roch secrete the ede then the ede is unusable. If the roch teleport the ede and the ede teleport the roch then the ede is unsmooth. If someone disinter the roch and they are unusable then the roch is avaricious. If someone secrete the ede and they chase the ede then they chase the roch. The roch does not chase the roch.", "logic": "\nUnfueled(roch)\nSecrete(roch, ede)\nDisinter(ede, roch)\nTeleport(ede, roch)\nUnusable(ede)\nTenth(ede)\nSecrete(ede, roch)\nAvaricious(roch) -> Teleport(roch, ede)\nforall x (Avaricious(x) and Teleport(x, ede) -> Secrete(x, roch))\nSecrete(roch, ede) and Teleport(ede, roch) -> Disinter(roch, ede)\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Disinter(x, ede))\nSecrete(ede, roch) and Secrete(roch, ede) -> Unusable(ede)\nTeleport(roch, ede) and Teleport(ede, roch) -> Unsmooth(ede)\nforall x (Disinter(x, roch) and Unusable(x) -> Avaricious(roch))\nforall x (Secrete(x, ede) and Disinter(x, ede) -> Disinter(x, roch))\n\nnot Disinter(roch, roch)\n\nUnfueled(roch) and forall x (Unfueled(x) -> Disinter(x, ede)) -> therefore Disinter(roch, ede) Secrete(roch, ede) and Disinter(roch, ede) and forall x (Secrete(x, ede) and Disinter(x, ede) -> Disinter(x, roch)) -> therefore Disinter(roch, roch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The viki is analogous. The viki vitaminize the nerty. The nerty schematize the viki. The nerty reap the viki. The nerty is acetic. The nerty is mozartian. The nerty vitaminize the viki. If the viki is hueless then the viki reap the nerty. If someone is hueless and they eat the nerty then they like the viki. If the viki vitaminize the nerty and the nerty reap the viki then the viki schematize the nerty. If someone is analogous then they chase the nerty. If the nerty vitaminize the viki and the viki vitaminize the nerty then the nerty is acetic. If the viki reap the nerty and the nerty reap the viki then the nerty is unpackaged. If someone schematize the viki and they are acetic then the viki is hueless. If someone vitaminize the nerty and they chase the nerty then they chase the viki. The viki vitaminize the viki.", "logic": "\nAnalogous(viki)\nVitaminize(viki, nerty)\nSchematize(nerty, viki)\nReap(nerty, viki)\nAcetic(nerty)\nMozartian(nerty)\nVitaminize(nerty, viki)\nHueless(viki) -> Reap(viki, nerty)\nforall x (Hueless(x) and Reap(x, nerty) -> Vitaminize(x, viki))\nVitaminize(viki, nerty) and Reap(nerty, viki) -> Schematize(viki, nerty)\nforall x (Analogous(x) -> Schematize(x, nerty))\nVitaminize(nerty, viki) and Vitaminize(viki, nerty) -> Acetic(nerty)\nReap(viki, nerty) and Reap(nerty, viki) -> Unpackaged(nerty)\nforall x (Schematize(x, viki) and Acetic(x) -> Hueless(viki))\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, nerty) and Schematize(x, nerty) -> Schematize(x, viki))\n\nVitaminize(viki, viki)\n\nSchematize(nerty, viki) and Acetic(nerty) and forall x (Schematize(x, viki) and Acetic(x) -> Hueless(viki)) -> therefore Hueless(viki) Schematize(nerty, viki) and Acetic(nerty) and forall x (Schematize(x, viki) and Acetic(x) -> Hueless(viki)) -> therefore Hueless(viki) Hueless(viki) and Hueless(viki) -> Reap(viki, nerty) -> therefore Reap(viki, nerty) Hueless(viki) and Reap(viki, nerty) and forall x (Hueless(x) and Reap(x, nerty) -> Vitaminize(x, viki)) -> therefore Vitaminize(viki, viki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The emera is consensual. The emera slalom the fiann. The fiann incite the emera. The fiann caramelise the emera. The fiann is resettled. The fiann is tops. The fiann slalom the emera. If the emera is cagey then the emera caramelise the fiann. If someone is cagey and they eat the fiann then they like the emera. If the emera slalom the fiann and the fiann caramelise the emera then the emera incite the fiann. If someone is consensual then they chase the fiann. If the fiann slalom the emera and the emera slalom the fiann then the fiann is resettled. If the emera caramelise the fiann and the fiann caramelise the emera then the fiann is distracted. If someone incite the emera and they are resettled then the emera is cagey. If someone slalom the fiann and they chase the fiann then they chase the emera. The fiann is not distracted.", "logic": "\nConsensual(emera)\nSlalom(emera, fiann)\nIncite(fiann, emera)\nCaramelise(fiann, emera)\nResettled(fiann)\nTops(fiann)\nSlalom(fiann, emera)\nCagey(emera) -> Caramelise(emera, fiann)\nforall x (Cagey(x) and Caramelise(x, fiann) -> Slalom(x, emera))\nSlalom(emera, fiann) and Caramelise(fiann, emera) -> Incite(emera, fiann)\nforall x (Consensual(x) -> Incite(x, fiann))\nSlalom(fiann, emera) and Slalom(emera, fiann) -> Resettled(fiann)\nCaramelise(emera, fiann) and Caramelise(fiann, emera) -> Distracted(fiann)\nforall x (Incite(x, emera) and Resettled(x) -> Cagey(emera))\nforall x (Slalom(x, fiann) and Incite(x, fiann) -> Incite(x, emera))\n\nnot Distracted(fiann)\n\nIncite(fiann, emera) and Resettled(fiann) and forall x (Incite(x, emera) and Resettled(x) -> Cagey(emera)) -> therefore Cagey(emera) Cagey(emera) and Cagey(emera) -> Caramelise(emera, fiann) -> therefore Caramelise(emera, fiann) Caramelise(emera, fiann) and Caramelise(fiann, emera) and Caramelise(emera, fiann) and Caramelise(fiann, emera) -> Distracted(fiann) -> therefore Distracted(fiann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The lee is excitant. The lee opine the ingrid. The ingrid rebuild the lee. The ingrid larrup the lee. The ingrid is expensive. The ingrid is intermural. The ingrid opine the lee. If the lee is specked then the lee larrup the ingrid. If someone is specked and they eat the ingrid then they like the lee. If the lee opine the ingrid and the ingrid larrup the lee then the lee rebuild the ingrid. If someone is excitant then they chase the ingrid. If the ingrid opine the lee and the lee opine the ingrid then the ingrid is expensive. If the lee larrup the ingrid and the ingrid larrup the lee then the ingrid is millenary. If someone rebuild the lee and they are expensive then the lee is specked. If someone opine the ingrid and they chase the ingrid then they chase the lee. The ingrid does not chase the ingrid.", "logic": "\nExcitant(lee)\nOpine(lee, ingrid)\nRebuild(ingrid, lee)\nLarrup(ingrid, lee)\nExpensive(ingrid)\nIntermural(ingrid)\nOpine(ingrid, lee)\nSpecked(lee) -> Larrup(lee, ingrid)\nforall x (Specked(x) and Larrup(x, ingrid) -> Opine(x, lee))\nOpine(lee, ingrid) and Larrup(ingrid, lee) -> Rebuild(lee, ingrid)\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> Rebuild(x, ingrid))\nOpine(ingrid, lee) and Opine(lee, ingrid) -> Expensive(ingrid)\nLarrup(lee, ingrid) and Larrup(ingrid, lee) -> Millenary(ingrid)\nforall x (Rebuild(x, lee) and Expensive(x) -> Specked(lee))\nforall x (Opine(x, ingrid) and Rebuild(x, ingrid) -> Rebuild(x, lee))\n\nnot Rebuild(ingrid, ingrid)\n\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> Rebuild(x, ingrid)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The ximenez is uruguayan. The ximenez summate the orly. The orly forego the ximenez. The orly aggrade the ximenez. The orly is verrucose. The orly is truncated. The orly summate the ximenez. If the ximenez is zygodactyl then the ximenez aggrade the orly. If someone is zygodactyl and they eat the orly then they like the ximenez. If the ximenez summate the orly and the orly aggrade the ximenez then the ximenez forego the orly. If someone is uruguayan then they chase the orly. If the orly summate the ximenez and the ximenez summate the orly then the orly is verrucose. If the ximenez aggrade the orly and the orly aggrade the ximenez then the orly is ascitic. If someone forego the ximenez and they are verrucose then the ximenez is zygodactyl. If someone summate the orly and they chase the orly then they chase the ximenez. The orly aggrade the orly.", "logic": "\nUruguayan(ximenez)\nSummate(ximenez, orly)\nForego(orly, ximenez)\nAggrade(orly, ximenez)\nVerrucose(orly)\nTruncated(orly)\nSummate(orly, ximenez)\nZygodactyl(ximenez) -> Aggrade(ximenez, orly)\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) and Aggrade(x, orly) -> Summate(x, ximenez))\nSummate(ximenez, orly) and Aggrade(orly, ximenez) -> Forego(ximenez, orly)\nforall x (Uruguayan(x) -> Forego(x, orly))\nSummate(orly, ximenez) and Summate(ximenez, orly) -> Verrucose(orly)\nAggrade(ximenez, orly) and Aggrade(orly, ximenez) -> Ascitic(orly)\nforall x (Forego(x, ximenez) and Verrucose(x) -> Zygodactyl(ximenez))\nforall x (Summate(x, orly) and Forego(x, orly) -> Forego(x, ximenez))\n\nAggrade(orly, orly)\n\nAggrade(orly, orly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The bernadene is relieved. The bernadene wrawl the randolf. The randolf transfix the bernadene. The randolf glut the bernadene. The randolf is ahorse. The randolf is chinked. The randolf wrawl the bernadene. If the bernadene is epochal then the bernadene glut the randolf. If someone is epochal and they eat the randolf then they like the bernadene. If the bernadene wrawl the randolf and the randolf glut the bernadene then the bernadene transfix the randolf. If someone is relieved then they chase the randolf. If the randolf wrawl the bernadene and the bernadene wrawl the randolf then the randolf is ahorse. If the bernadene glut the randolf and the randolf glut the bernadene then the randolf is climatical. If someone transfix the bernadene and they are ahorse then the bernadene is epochal. If someone wrawl the randolf and they chase the randolf then they chase the bernadene. The bernadene does not eat the bernadene.", "logic": "\nRelieved(bernadene)\nWrawl(bernadene, randolf)\nTransfix(randolf, bernadene)\nGlut(randolf, bernadene)\nAhorse(randolf)\nChinked(randolf)\nWrawl(randolf, bernadene)\nEpochal(bernadene) -> Glut(bernadene, randolf)\nforall x (Epochal(x) and Glut(x, randolf) -> Wrawl(x, bernadene))\nWrawl(bernadene, randolf) and Glut(randolf, bernadene) -> Transfix(bernadene, randolf)\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Transfix(x, randolf))\nWrawl(randolf, bernadene) and Wrawl(bernadene, randolf) -> Ahorse(randolf)\nGlut(bernadene, randolf) and Glut(randolf, bernadene) -> Climatical(randolf)\nforall x (Transfix(x, bernadene) and Ahorse(x) -> Epochal(bernadene))\nforall x (Wrawl(x, randolf) and Transfix(x, randolf) -> Transfix(x, bernadene))\n\nnot Glut(bernadene, bernadene)\n\nnot Glut(bernadene, bernadene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The ninnetta is enchained. The ninnetta hobnob the griff. The griff wince the ninnetta. The griff outmatch the ninnetta. The griff is scared. The griff is unfounded. The griff hobnob the ninnetta. If the ninnetta is favourite then the ninnetta outmatch the griff. If someone is favourite and they eat the griff then they like the ninnetta. If the ninnetta hobnob the griff and the griff outmatch the ninnetta then the ninnetta wince the griff. If someone is enchained then they chase the griff. If the griff hobnob the ninnetta and the ninnetta hobnob the griff then the griff is scared. If the ninnetta outmatch the griff and the griff outmatch the ninnetta then the griff is dogmatical. If someone wince the ninnetta and they are scared then the ninnetta is favourite. If someone hobnob the griff and they chase the griff then they chase the ninnetta. The griff hobnob the griff.", "logic": "\nEnchained(ninnetta)\nHobnob(ninnetta, griff)\nWince(griff, ninnetta)\nOutmatch(griff, ninnetta)\nScared(griff)\nUnfounded(griff)\nHobnob(griff, ninnetta)\nFavourite(ninnetta) -> Outmatch(ninnetta, griff)\nforall x (Favourite(x) and Outmatch(x, griff) -> Hobnob(x, ninnetta))\nHobnob(ninnetta, griff) and Outmatch(griff, ninnetta) -> Wince(ninnetta, griff)\nforall x (Enchained(x) -> Wince(x, griff))\nHobnob(griff, ninnetta) and Hobnob(ninnetta, griff) -> Scared(griff)\nOutmatch(ninnetta, griff) and Outmatch(griff, ninnetta) -> Dogmatical(griff)\nforall x (Wince(x, ninnetta) and Scared(x) -> Favourite(ninnetta))\nforall x (Hobnob(x, griff) and Wince(x, griff) -> Wince(x, ninnetta))\n\nHobnob(griff, griff)\n\nHobnob(griff, griff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The aloysius is acrobatic. The aloysius vouch the lilian. The lilian flip the aloysius. The lilian summit the aloysius. The lilian is conjoint. The lilian is humbled. The lilian vouch the aloysius. If the aloysius is aureate then the aloysius summit the lilian. If someone is aureate and they eat the lilian then they like the aloysius. If the aloysius vouch the lilian and the lilian summit the aloysius then the aloysius flip the lilian. If someone is acrobatic then they chase the lilian. If the lilian vouch the aloysius and the aloysius vouch the lilian then the lilian is conjoint. If the aloysius summit the lilian and the lilian summit the aloysius then the lilian is incapable. If someone flip the aloysius and they are conjoint then the aloysius is aureate. If someone vouch the lilian and they chase the lilian then they chase the aloysius. The lilian is not acrobatic.", "logic": "\nAcrobatic(aloysius)\nVouch(aloysius, lilian)\nFlip(lilian, aloysius)\nSummit(lilian, aloysius)\nConjoint(lilian)\nHumbled(lilian)\nVouch(lilian, aloysius)\nAureate(aloysius) -> Summit(aloysius, lilian)\nforall x (Aureate(x) and Summit(x, lilian) -> Vouch(x, aloysius))\nVouch(aloysius, lilian) and Summit(lilian, aloysius) -> Flip(aloysius, lilian)\nforall x (Acrobatic(x) -> Flip(x, lilian))\nVouch(lilian, aloysius) and Vouch(aloysius, lilian) -> Conjoint(lilian)\nSummit(aloysius, lilian) and Summit(lilian, aloysius) -> Incapable(lilian)\nforall x (Flip(x, aloysius) and Conjoint(x) -> Aureate(aloysius))\nforall x (Vouch(x, lilian) and Flip(x, lilian) -> Flip(x, aloysius))\n\nnot Acrobatic(lilian)\n\nnot Acrobatic(lilian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The ashlie is common. The ashlie putrefy the nunzio. The nunzio digitise the ashlie. The nunzio dyke the ashlie. The nunzio is delineated. The nunzio is industrial. The nunzio putrefy the ashlie. If the ashlie is bodily then the ashlie dyke the nunzio. If someone is bodily and they eat the nunzio then they like the ashlie. If the ashlie putrefy the nunzio and the nunzio dyke the ashlie then the ashlie digitise the nunzio. If someone is common then they chase the nunzio. If the nunzio putrefy the ashlie and the ashlie putrefy the nunzio then the nunzio is delineated. If the ashlie dyke the nunzio and the nunzio dyke the ashlie then the nunzio is unbaptised. If someone digitise the ashlie and they are delineated then the ashlie is bodily. If someone putrefy the nunzio and they chase the nunzio then they chase the ashlie. The ashlie is delineated.", "logic": "\nCommon(ashlie)\nPutrefy(ashlie, nunzio)\nDigitise(nunzio, ashlie)\nDyke(nunzio, ashlie)\nDelineated(nunzio)\nIndustrial(nunzio)\nPutrefy(nunzio, ashlie)\nBodily(ashlie) -> Dyke(ashlie, nunzio)\nforall x (Bodily(x) and Dyke(x, nunzio) -> Putrefy(x, ashlie))\nPutrefy(ashlie, nunzio) and Dyke(nunzio, ashlie) -> Digitise(ashlie, nunzio)\nforall x (Common(x) -> Digitise(x, nunzio))\nPutrefy(nunzio, ashlie) and Putrefy(ashlie, nunzio) -> Delineated(nunzio)\nDyke(ashlie, nunzio) and Dyke(nunzio, ashlie) -> Unbaptised(nunzio)\nforall x (Digitise(x, ashlie) and Delineated(x) -> Bodily(ashlie))\nforall x (Putrefy(x, nunzio) and Digitise(x, nunzio) -> Digitise(x, ashlie))\n\nDelineated(ashlie)\n\nDelineated(ashlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The lauraine is uttermost. The lauraine reschedule the henryetta. The henryetta snore the lauraine. The henryetta glamour the lauraine. The henryetta is valued. The henryetta is incipient. The henryetta reschedule the lauraine. If the lauraine is cordless then the lauraine glamour the henryetta. If someone is cordless and they eat the henryetta then they like the lauraine. If the lauraine reschedule the henryetta and the henryetta glamour the lauraine then the lauraine snore the henryetta. If someone is uttermost then they chase the henryetta. If the henryetta reschedule the lauraine and the lauraine reschedule the henryetta then the henryetta is valued. If the lauraine glamour the henryetta and the henryetta glamour the lauraine then the henryetta is untoward. If someone snore the lauraine and they are valued then the lauraine is cordless. If someone reschedule the henryetta and they chase the henryetta then they chase the lauraine. The lauraine is not untoward.", "logic": "\nUttermost(lauraine)\nReschedule(lauraine, henryetta)\nSnore(henryetta, lauraine)\nGlamour(henryetta, lauraine)\nValued(henryetta)\nIncipient(henryetta)\nReschedule(henryetta, lauraine)\nCordless(lauraine) -> Glamour(lauraine, henryetta)\nforall x (Cordless(x) and Glamour(x, henryetta) -> Reschedule(x, lauraine))\nReschedule(lauraine, henryetta) and Glamour(henryetta, lauraine) -> Snore(lauraine, henryetta)\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Snore(x, henryetta))\nReschedule(henryetta, lauraine) and Reschedule(lauraine, henryetta) -> Valued(henryetta)\nGlamour(lauraine, henryetta) and Glamour(henryetta, lauraine) -> Untoward(henryetta)\nforall x (Snore(x, lauraine) and Valued(x) -> Cordless(lauraine))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, henryetta) and Snore(x, henryetta) -> Snore(x, lauraine))\n\nnot Untoward(lauraine)\n\nnot Untoward(lauraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The henry is digital. The henry accomplish the wyndham. The wyndham totalize the henry. The wyndham hook the henry. The wyndham is unscalable. The wyndham is haywire. The wyndham accomplish the henry. If the henry is saccadic then the henry hook the wyndham. If someone is saccadic and they eat the wyndham then they like the henry. If the henry accomplish the wyndham and the wyndham hook the henry then the henry totalize the wyndham. If someone is digital then they chase the wyndham. If the wyndham accomplish the henry and the henry accomplish the wyndham then the wyndham is unscalable. If the henry hook the wyndham and the wyndham hook the henry then the wyndham is motionless. If someone totalize the henry and they are unscalable then the henry is saccadic. If someone accomplish the wyndham and they chase the wyndham then they chase the henry. The henry is haywire.", "logic": "\nDigital(henry)\nAccomplish(henry, wyndham)\nTotalize(wyndham, henry)\nHook(wyndham, henry)\nUnscalable(wyndham)\nHaywire(wyndham)\nAccomplish(wyndham, henry)\nSaccadic(henry) -> Hook(henry, wyndham)\nforall x (Saccadic(x) and Hook(x, wyndham) -> Accomplish(x, henry))\nAccomplish(henry, wyndham) and Hook(wyndham, henry) -> Totalize(henry, wyndham)\nforall x (Digital(x) -> Totalize(x, wyndham))\nAccomplish(wyndham, henry) and Accomplish(henry, wyndham) -> Unscalable(wyndham)\nHook(henry, wyndham) and Hook(wyndham, henry) -> Motionless(wyndham)\nforall x (Totalize(x, henry) and Unscalable(x) -> Saccadic(henry))\nforall x (Accomplish(x, wyndham) and Totalize(x, wyndham) -> Totalize(x, henry))\n\nHaywire(henry)\n\nHaywire(henry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-644"} {"premises": "The dorcas cosset the federica. The dorcas is cheap. The dorcas is refreshed. The dorcas is argentine. The dorcas is cranky. The dorcas is unopen. The dorcas deoxidise the federica. The dorcas divulge the federica. The federica cosset the dorcas. The federica is cheap. The federica is refreshed. The federica is argentine. The federica is cranky. The federica deoxidise the dorcas. The federica divulge the dorcas. If someone is unopen then they chase the dorcas. If someone is refreshed and argentine then they need the federica. If someone is refreshed and cheap then they chase the dorcas. If the federica divulge the dorcas then the federica cosset the dorcas. If the dorcas cosset the federica then the federica deoxidise the dorcas. If the federica is argentine and the federica is unopen then the federica deoxidise the dorcas. The dorcas is argentine.", "logic": "\nCosset(dorcas, federica)\nCheap(dorcas)\nRefreshed(dorcas)\nArgentine(dorcas)\nCranky(dorcas)\nUnopen(dorcas)\nDeoxidise(dorcas, federica)\nDivulge(dorcas, federica)\nCosset(federica, dorcas)\nCheap(federica)\nRefreshed(federica)\nArgentine(federica)\nCranky(federica)\nDeoxidise(federica, dorcas)\nDivulge(federica, dorcas)\nforall x (Unopen(x) -> Cosset(x, dorcas))\nforall x (Refreshed(x) and Argentine(x) -> Deoxidise(x, federica))\nforall x (Refreshed(x) and Cheap(x) -> Cosset(x, dorcas))\nDivulge(federica, dorcas) -> Cosset(federica, dorcas)\nCosset(dorcas, federica) -> Deoxidise(federica, dorcas)\nArgentine(federica) and Unopen(federica) -> Deoxidise(federica, dorcas)\n\nArgentine(dorcas)\n\ntherefore Argentine(dorcas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2146"} {"premises": "The goldarina strip the sunshine. The goldarina is anapestic. The goldarina is fruitless. The goldarina is cathectic. The goldarina is oleaceous. The goldarina is amatory. The goldarina colourise the sunshine. The goldarina bolshevise the sunshine. The sunshine strip the goldarina. The sunshine is anapestic. The sunshine is fruitless. The sunshine is cathectic. The sunshine is oleaceous. The sunshine colourise the goldarina. The sunshine bolshevise the goldarina. If someone is amatory then they chase the goldarina. If someone is fruitless and cathectic then they need the sunshine. If someone is fruitless and anapestic then they chase the goldarina. If the sunshine bolshevise the goldarina then the sunshine strip the goldarina. If the goldarina strip the sunshine then the sunshine colourise the goldarina. If the sunshine is cathectic and the sunshine is amatory then the sunshine colourise the goldarina. The sunshine is not cathectic.", "logic": "\nStrip(goldarina, sunshine)\nAnapestic(goldarina)\nFruitless(goldarina)\nCathectic(goldarina)\nOleaceous(goldarina)\nAmatory(goldarina)\nColourise(goldarina, sunshine)\nBolshevise(goldarina, sunshine)\nStrip(sunshine, goldarina)\nAnapestic(sunshine)\nFruitless(sunshine)\nCathectic(sunshine)\nOleaceous(sunshine)\nColourise(sunshine, goldarina)\nBolshevise(sunshine, goldarina)\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Strip(x, goldarina))\nforall x (Fruitless(x) and Cathectic(x) -> Colourise(x, sunshine))\nforall x (Fruitless(x) and Anapestic(x) -> Strip(x, goldarina))\nBolshevise(sunshine, goldarina) -> Strip(sunshine, goldarina)\nStrip(goldarina, sunshine) -> Colourise(sunshine, goldarina)\nCathectic(sunshine) and Amatory(sunshine) -> Colourise(sunshine, goldarina)\n\nnot Cathectic(sunshine)\n\ntherefore Cathectic(sunshine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2146"} {"premises": "The fanny pillory the anica. The fanny is spiritual. The fanny is designate. The fanny is amusing. The fanny is boneless. The fanny is opening. The fanny ticktack the anica. The fanny mutilate the anica. The anica pillory the fanny. The anica is spiritual. The anica is designate. The anica is amusing. The anica is boneless. The anica ticktack the fanny. The anica mutilate the fanny. If someone is opening then they chase the fanny. If someone is designate and amusing then they need the anica. If someone is designate and spiritual then they chase the fanny. If the anica mutilate the fanny then the anica pillory the fanny. If the fanny pillory the anica then the anica ticktack the fanny. If the anica is amusing and the anica is opening then the anica ticktack the fanny. The anica is not opening.", "logic": "\nPillory(fanny, anica)\nSpiritual(fanny)\nDesignate(fanny)\nAmusing(fanny)\nBoneless(fanny)\nOpening(fanny)\nTicktack(fanny, anica)\nMutilate(fanny, anica)\nPillory(anica, fanny)\nSpiritual(anica)\nDesignate(anica)\nAmusing(anica)\nBoneless(anica)\nTicktack(anica, fanny)\nMutilate(anica, fanny)\nforall x (Opening(x) -> Pillory(x, fanny))\nforall x (Designate(x) and Amusing(x) -> Ticktack(x, anica))\nforall x (Designate(x) and Spiritual(x) -> Pillory(x, fanny))\nMutilate(anica, fanny) -> Pillory(anica, fanny)\nPillory(fanny, anica) -> Ticktack(anica, fanny)\nAmusing(anica) and Opening(anica) -> Ticktack(anica, fanny)\n\nnot Opening(anica)\n\nnot Opening(anica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2146"} {"premises": "The daisie rook the monica. The daisie is dodgy. The daisie is symphonic. The daisie is scoreless. The daisie is sphingine. The daisie is ruly. The daisie disunite the monica. The daisie skim the monica. The monica rook the daisie. The monica is dodgy. The monica is symphonic. The monica is scoreless. The monica is sphingine. The monica disunite the daisie. The monica skim the daisie. If someone is ruly then they chase the daisie. If someone is symphonic and scoreless then they need the monica. If someone is symphonic and dodgy then they chase the daisie. If the monica skim the daisie then the monica rook the daisie. If the daisie rook the monica then the monica disunite the daisie. If the monica is scoreless and the monica is ruly then the monica disunite the daisie. The monica rook the monica.", "logic": "\nRook(daisie, monica)\nDodgy(daisie)\nSymphonic(daisie)\nScoreless(daisie)\nSphingine(daisie)\nRuly(daisie)\nDisunite(daisie, monica)\nSkim(daisie, monica)\nRook(monica, daisie)\nDodgy(monica)\nSymphonic(monica)\nScoreless(monica)\nSphingine(monica)\nDisunite(monica, daisie)\nSkim(monica, daisie)\nforall x (Ruly(x) -> Rook(x, daisie))\nforall x (Symphonic(x) and Scoreless(x) -> Disunite(x, monica))\nforall x (Symphonic(x) and Dodgy(x) -> Rook(x, daisie))\nSkim(monica, daisie) -> Rook(monica, daisie)\nRook(daisie, monica) -> Disunite(monica, daisie)\nScoreless(monica) and Ruly(monica) -> Disunite(monica, daisie)\n\nRook(monica, monica)\n\nRook(monica, monica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2146"} {"premises": "Thomas is abkhaz. Thomas is not aperiodic. Thomas is afflicted. Thomas is framed. Thomas is not brahminic. Garry is not abkhaz. Garry is billed. Garry is not aperiodic. Garry is not afflicted. Garry is not framed. Garry is cashable. Garry is brahminic. Ernestine is aperiodic. Ernestine is afflicted. Ernestine is cashable. Ernestine is brahminic. Nice people are afflicted. All abkhaz, framed people are cashable. If someone is aperiodic then they are abkhaz. Ernestine is aperiodic.", "logic": "\nAbkhaz(thomas)\nnot Aperiodic(thomas)\nAfflicted(thomas)\nFramed(thomas)\nnot Brahminic(thomas)\nnot Abkhaz(garry)\nBilled(garry)\nnot Aperiodic(garry)\nnot Afflicted(garry)\nnot Framed(garry)\nCashable(garry)\nBrahminic(garry)\nAperiodic(ernestine)\nAfflicted(ernestine)\nCashable(ernestine)\nBrahminic(ernestine)\nforall x (Aperiodic(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nforall x (Abkhaz(x) and Framed(x) -> Cashable(x))\nforall x (Aperiodic(x) -> Abkhaz(x))\n\nAperiodic(ernestine)\n\ntherefore Aperiodic(ernestine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6029"} {"premises": "Konstance is whatsoever. Konstance is not hydric. Konstance is varnished. Konstance is mettlesome. Konstance is not unseen. Vail is not whatsoever. Vail is famished. Vail is not hydric. Vail is not varnished. Vail is not mettlesome. Vail is manque. Vail is unseen. Silvanus is hydric. Silvanus is varnished. Silvanus is manque. Silvanus is unseen. Nice people are varnished. All whatsoever, mettlesome people are manque. If someone is hydric then they are whatsoever. Vail is not manque.", "logic": "\nWhatsoever(konstance)\nnot Hydric(konstance)\nVarnished(konstance)\nMettlesome(konstance)\nnot Unseen(konstance)\nnot Whatsoever(vail)\nFamished(vail)\nnot Hydric(vail)\nnot Varnished(vail)\nnot Mettlesome(vail)\nManque(vail)\nUnseen(vail)\nHydric(silvanus)\nVarnished(silvanus)\nManque(silvanus)\nUnseen(silvanus)\nforall x (Hydric(x) -> Varnished(x))\nforall x (Whatsoever(x) and Mettlesome(x) -> Manque(x))\nforall x (Hydric(x) -> Whatsoever(x))\n\nnot Manque(vail)\n\ntherefore Manque(vail)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6029"} {"premises": "Benita is prostrate. Benita is not drugless. Benita is fourhanded. Benita is sticking. Benita is not schizoid. Marietta is not prostrate. Marietta is huffish. Marietta is not drugless. Marietta is not fourhanded. Marietta is not sticking. Marietta is attainable. Marietta is schizoid. Shirah is drugless. Shirah is fourhanded. Shirah is attainable. Shirah is schizoid. Nice people are fourhanded. All prostrate, sticking people are attainable. If someone is drugless then they are prostrate. Benita is not huffish.", "logic": "\nProstrate(benita)\nnot Drugless(benita)\nFourhanded(benita)\nSticking(benita)\nnot Schizoid(benita)\nnot Prostrate(marietta)\nHuffish(marietta)\nnot Drugless(marietta)\nnot Fourhanded(marietta)\nnot Sticking(marietta)\nAttainable(marietta)\nSchizoid(marietta)\nDrugless(shirah)\nFourhanded(shirah)\nAttainable(shirah)\nSchizoid(shirah)\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Fourhanded(x))\nforall x (Prostrate(x) and Sticking(x) -> Attainable(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Prostrate(x))\n\nnot Huffish(benita)\n\nnot Huffish(benita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6029"} {"premises": "Melina is excellent. Melina is not literary. Melina is apotropaic. Melina is connatural. Melina is not cephalopod. Cornelius is not excellent. Cornelius is unfilled. Cornelius is not literary. Cornelius is not apotropaic. Cornelius is not connatural. Cornelius is vegetive. Cornelius is cephalopod. Brittney is literary. Brittney is apotropaic. Brittney is vegetive. Brittney is cephalopod. Nice people are apotropaic. All excellent, connatural people are vegetive. If someone is literary then they are excellent. Brittney is unfilled.", "logic": "\nExcellent(melina)\nnot Literary(melina)\nApotropaic(melina)\nConnatural(melina)\nnot Cephalopod(melina)\nnot Excellent(cornelius)\nUnfilled(cornelius)\nnot Literary(cornelius)\nnot Apotropaic(cornelius)\nnot Connatural(cornelius)\nVegetive(cornelius)\nCephalopod(cornelius)\nLiterary(brittney)\nApotropaic(brittney)\nVegetive(brittney)\nCephalopod(brittney)\nforall x (Literary(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) and Connatural(x) -> Vegetive(x))\nforall x (Literary(x) -> Excellent(x))\n\nUnfilled(brittney)\n\nUnfilled(brittney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6029"} {"premises": "Elisabet is sewn. Elisabet is ceramic. Elisabet is not transpolar. Shurlocke is sewn. Shurlocke is not ceramic. Shurlocke is wild. Ceciley is not aggregated. Ceciley is fifteen. Ceciley is sewn. Ceciley is ceramic. Ceciley is wild. Ceciley is transpolar. If something is ceramic then it is sewn. If something is transpolar and not ceramic then it is sewn. All aggregated, ceramic things are sewn. If something is transpolar and calumnious then it is sewn. If something is sewn and transpolar then it is fifteen. All wild things are calumnious. Shurlocke is wild.", "logic": "\nSewn(elisabet)\nCeramic(elisabet)\nnot Transpolar(elisabet)\nSewn(shurlocke)\nnot Ceramic(shurlocke)\nWild(shurlocke)\nnot Aggregated(ceciley)\nFifteen(ceciley)\nSewn(ceciley)\nCeramic(ceciley)\nWild(ceciley)\nTranspolar(ceciley)\nforall x (Ceramic(x) -> Sewn(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) and not Ceramic(x) -> Sewn(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) and Ceramic(x) -> Sewn(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) and Calumnious(x) -> Sewn(x))\nforall x (Sewn(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Fifteen(x))\nforall x (Wild(x) -> Calumnious(x))\n\nWild(shurlocke)\n\ntherefore Wild(shurlocke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Lavinie is volitional. Lavinie is wrinkled. Lavinie is not follicular. Garv is volitional. Garv is not wrinkled. Garv is external. Zsazsa is not advanced. Zsazsa is prenominal. Zsazsa is volitional. Zsazsa is wrinkled. Zsazsa is external. Zsazsa is follicular. If something is wrinkled then it is volitional. If something is follicular and not wrinkled then it is volitional. All advanced, wrinkled things are volitional. If something is follicular and embossed then it is volitional. If something is volitional and follicular then it is prenominal. All external things are embossed. Zsazsa is not wrinkled.", "logic": "\nVolitional(lavinie)\nWrinkled(lavinie)\nnot Follicular(lavinie)\nVolitional(garv)\nnot Wrinkled(garv)\nExternal(garv)\nnot Advanced(zsazsa)\nPrenominal(zsazsa)\nVolitional(zsazsa)\nWrinkled(zsazsa)\nExternal(zsazsa)\nFollicular(zsazsa)\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) -> Volitional(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and not Wrinkled(x) -> Volitional(x))\nforall x (Advanced(x) and Wrinkled(x) -> Volitional(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Embossed(x) -> Volitional(x))\nforall x (Volitional(x) and Follicular(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (External(x) -> Embossed(x))\n\nnot Wrinkled(zsazsa)\n\ntherefore Wrinkled(zsazsa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Sheeree is teeming. Sheeree is indwelling. Sheeree is not clonal. Sloan is teeming. Sloan is not indwelling. Sloan is lactic. Josefina is not notorious. Josefina is darkling. Josefina is teeming. Josefina is indwelling. Josefina is lactic. Josefina is clonal. If something is indwelling then it is teeming. If something is clonal and not indwelling then it is teeming. All notorious, indwelling things are teeming. If something is clonal and overland then it is teeming. If something is teeming and clonal then it is darkling. All lactic things are overland. Josefina is overland.", "logic": "\nTeeming(sheeree)\nIndwelling(sheeree)\nnot Clonal(sheeree)\nTeeming(sloan)\nnot Indwelling(sloan)\nLactic(sloan)\nnot Notorious(josefina)\nDarkling(josefina)\nTeeming(josefina)\nIndwelling(josefina)\nLactic(josefina)\nClonal(josefina)\nforall x (Indwelling(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Clonal(x) and not Indwelling(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Notorious(x) and Indwelling(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Clonal(x) and Overland(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Teeming(x) and Clonal(x) -> Darkling(x))\nforall x (Lactic(x) -> Overland(x))\n\nOverland(josefina)\n\nLactic(josefina) and forall x (Lactic(x) -> Overland(x)) -> therefore Overland(josefina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Addie is minor. Addie is fallacious. Addie is not deweyan. Zilvia is minor. Zilvia is not fallacious. Zilvia is clonal. Judd is not nestorian. Judd is undimmed. Judd is minor. Judd is fallacious. Judd is clonal. Judd is deweyan. If something is fallacious then it is minor. If something is deweyan and not fallacious then it is minor. All nestorian, fallacious things are minor. If something is deweyan and shrubby then it is minor. If something is minor and deweyan then it is undimmed. All clonal things are shrubby. Zilvia is not shrubby.", "logic": "\nMinor(addie)\nFallacious(addie)\nnot Deweyan(addie)\nMinor(zilvia)\nnot Fallacious(zilvia)\nClonal(zilvia)\nnot Nestorian(judd)\nUndimmed(judd)\nMinor(judd)\nFallacious(judd)\nClonal(judd)\nDeweyan(judd)\nforall x (Fallacious(x) -> Minor(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) and not Fallacious(x) -> Minor(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) and Fallacious(x) -> Minor(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) and Shrubby(x) -> Minor(x))\nforall x (Minor(x) and Deweyan(x) -> Undimmed(x))\nforall x (Clonal(x) -> Shrubby(x))\n\nnot Shrubby(zilvia)\n\nClonal(zilvia) and forall x (Clonal(x) -> Shrubby(x)) -> therefore Shrubby(zilvia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Piper is pretend. Piper is wigless. Piper is not osteal. Jeralee is pretend. Jeralee is not wigless. Jeralee is apogametic. Lisha is not freehanded. Lisha is carangid. Lisha is pretend. Lisha is wigless. Lisha is apogametic. Lisha is osteal. If something is wigless then it is pretend. If something is osteal and not wigless then it is pretend. All freehanded, wigless things are pretend. If something is osteal and subsequent then it is pretend. If something is pretend and osteal then it is carangid. All apogametic things are subsequent. Jeralee is not carangid.", "logic": "\nPretend(piper)\nWigless(piper)\nnot Osteal(piper)\nPretend(jeralee)\nnot Wigless(jeralee)\nApogametic(jeralee)\nnot Freehanded(lisha)\nCarangid(lisha)\nPretend(lisha)\nWigless(lisha)\nApogametic(lisha)\nOsteal(lisha)\nforall x (Wigless(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Osteal(x) and not Wigless(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) and Wigless(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Osteal(x) and Subsequent(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Pretend(x) and Osteal(x) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Apogametic(x) -> Subsequent(x))\n\nnot Carangid(jeralee)\n\nforall x (Pretend(x) and Osteal(x) -> Carangid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Elenore is undigested. Elenore is nonprofit. Elenore is not beaked. Maisey is undigested. Maisey is not nonprofit. Maisey is archeozoic. Braden is not crabwise. Braden is traceable. Braden is undigested. Braden is nonprofit. Braden is archeozoic. Braden is beaked. If something is nonprofit then it is undigested. If something is beaked and not nonprofit then it is undigested. All crabwise, nonprofit things are undigested. If something is beaked and nativist then it is undigested. If something is undigested and beaked then it is traceable. All archeozoic things are nativist. Elenore is traceable.", "logic": "\nUndigested(elenore)\nNonprofit(elenore)\nnot Beaked(elenore)\nUndigested(maisey)\nnot Nonprofit(maisey)\nArcheozoic(maisey)\nnot Crabwise(braden)\nTraceable(braden)\nUndigested(braden)\nNonprofit(braden)\nArcheozoic(braden)\nBeaked(braden)\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Beaked(x) and not Nonprofit(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) and Nonprofit(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Beaked(x) and Nativist(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) and Beaked(x) -> Traceable(x))\nforall x (Archeozoic(x) -> Nativist(x))\n\nTraceable(elenore)\n\nforall x (Undigested(x) and Beaked(x) -> Traceable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Easter is echoic. Easter is coltish. Easter is not anagogic. Tildie is echoic. Tildie is not coltish. Tildie is about. Priscella is not parvenu. Priscella is somali. Priscella is echoic. Priscella is coltish. Priscella is about. Priscella is anagogic. If something is coltish then it is echoic. If something is anagogic and not coltish then it is echoic. All parvenu, coltish things are echoic. If something is anagogic and juridic then it is echoic. If something is echoic and anagogic then it is somali. All about things are juridic. Easter is not about.", "logic": "\nEchoic(easter)\nColtish(easter)\nnot Anagogic(easter)\nEchoic(tildie)\nnot Coltish(tildie)\nAbout(tildie)\nnot Parvenu(priscella)\nSomali(priscella)\nEchoic(priscella)\nColtish(priscella)\nAbout(priscella)\nAnagogic(priscella)\nforall x (Coltish(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and not Coltish(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and Coltish(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Juridic(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Echoic(x) and Anagogic(x) -> Somali(x))\nforall x (About(x) -> Juridic(x))\n\nnot About(easter)\n\nnot About(easter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Andie is inviolable. Andie is agential. Andie is not mirrorlike. Mahala is inviolable. Mahala is not agential. Mahala is dermic. Amalee is not five. Amalee is stigmatic. Amalee is inviolable. Amalee is agential. Amalee is dermic. Amalee is mirrorlike. If something is agential then it is inviolable. If something is mirrorlike and not agential then it is inviolable. All five, agential things are inviolable. If something is mirrorlike and chancy then it is inviolable. If something is inviolable and mirrorlike then it is stigmatic. All dermic things are chancy. Mahala is five.", "logic": "\nInviolable(andie)\nAgential(andie)\nnot Mirrorlike(andie)\nInviolable(mahala)\nnot Agential(mahala)\nDermic(mahala)\nnot Five(amalee)\nStigmatic(amalee)\nInviolable(amalee)\nAgential(amalee)\nDermic(amalee)\nMirrorlike(amalee)\nforall x (Agential(x) -> Inviolable(x))\nforall x (Mirrorlike(x) and not Agential(x) -> Inviolable(x))\nforall x (Five(x) and Agential(x) -> Inviolable(x))\nforall x (Mirrorlike(x) and Chancy(x) -> Inviolable(x))\nforall x (Inviolable(x) and Mirrorlike(x) -> Stigmatic(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> Chancy(x))\n\nFive(mahala)\n\nFive(mahala) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-395"} {"premises": "Cory is subtropic. If someone is stepwise and zambian then they are wintery. If someone is stepwise and subtropic then they are zambian. If someone is subtropic then they are stepwise. Cory is subtropic.", "logic": "\nSubtropic(cory)\nforall x (Stepwise(x) and Zambian(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) and Subtropic(x) -> Zambian(x))\nforall x (Subtropic(x) -> Stepwise(x))\n\nSubtropic(cory)\n\ntherefore Subtropic(cory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Winn is sunless. If someone is preferable and atoxic then they are unmusical. If someone is preferable and sunless then they are atoxic. If someone is sunless then they are preferable. Winn is not sunless.", "logic": "\nSunless(winn)\nforall x (Preferable(x) and Atoxic(x) -> Unmusical(x))\nforall x (Preferable(x) and Sunless(x) -> Atoxic(x))\nforall x (Sunless(x) -> Preferable(x))\n\nnot Sunless(winn)\n\ntherefore Sunless(winn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Vail is sinning. If someone is shortened and inward then they are lxxviii. If someone is shortened and sinning then they are inward. If someone is sinning then they are shortened. Vail is shortened.", "logic": "\nSinning(vail)\nforall x (Shortened(x) and Inward(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Shortened(x) and Sinning(x) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Sinning(x) -> Shortened(x))\n\nShortened(vail)\n\nSinning(vail) and forall x (Sinning(x) -> Shortened(x)) -> therefore Shortened(vail)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Kizzee is trabecular. If someone is veteran and spiteful then they are simulated. If someone is veteran and trabecular then they are spiteful. If someone is trabecular then they are veteran. Kizzee is not veteran.", "logic": "\nTrabecular(kizzee)\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Spiteful(x) -> Simulated(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Trabecular(x) -> Spiteful(x))\nforall x (Trabecular(x) -> Veteran(x))\n\nnot Veteran(kizzee)\n\nTrabecular(kizzee) and forall x (Trabecular(x) -> Veteran(x)) -> therefore Veteran(kizzee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Reynolds is brainy. If someone is revealing and tractive then they are dozen. If someone is revealing and brainy then they are tractive. If someone is brainy then they are revealing. Reynolds is tractive.", "logic": "\nBrainy(reynolds)\nforall x (Revealing(x) and Tractive(x) -> Dozen(x))\nforall x (Revealing(x) and Brainy(x) -> Tractive(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) -> Revealing(x))\n\nTractive(reynolds)\n\nBrainy(reynolds) and forall x (Brainy(x) -> Revealing(x)) -> therefore Revealing(reynolds) Revealing(reynolds) and Brainy(reynolds) and forall x (Revealing(x) and Brainy(x) -> Tractive(x)) -> therefore Tractive(reynolds)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Elbert is sham. If someone is chapfallen and prefab then they are agitative. If someone is chapfallen and sham then they are prefab. If someone is sham then they are chapfallen. Elbert is not prefab.", "logic": "\nSham(elbert)\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and Prefab(x) -> Agitative(x))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) and Sham(x) -> Prefab(x))\nforall x (Sham(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\n\nnot Prefab(elbert)\n\nSham(elbert) and forall x (Sham(x) -> Chapfallen(x)) -> therefore Chapfallen(elbert) Chapfallen(elbert) and Sham(elbert) and forall x (Chapfallen(x) and Sham(x) -> Prefab(x)) -> therefore Prefab(elbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Kayley is grapey. If someone is alkahestic and earlier then they are moravian. If someone is alkahestic and grapey then they are earlier. If someone is grapey then they are alkahestic. Kayley is moravian.", "logic": "\nGrapey(kayley)\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) and Earlier(x) -> Moravian(x))\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) and Grapey(x) -> Earlier(x))\nforall x (Grapey(x) -> Alkahestic(x))\n\nMoravian(kayley)\n\nGrapey(kayley) and forall x (Grapey(x) -> Alkahestic(x)) -> therefore Alkahestic(kayley) Grapey(kayley) and forall x (Grapey(x) -> Alkahestic(x)) -> therefore Alkahestic(kayley) Alkahestic(kayley) and Grapey(kayley) and forall x (Alkahestic(x) and Grapey(x) -> Earlier(x)) -> therefore Earlier(kayley) Alkahestic(kayley) and Earlier(kayley) and forall x (Alkahestic(x) and Earlier(x) -> Moravian(x)) -> therefore Moravian(kayley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Merilyn is handy. If someone is alert and cyclonal then they are barefooted. If someone is alert and handy then they are cyclonal. If someone is handy then they are alert. Merilyn is not barefooted.", "logic": "\nHandy(merilyn)\nforall x (Alert(x) and Cyclonal(x) -> Barefooted(x))\nforall x (Alert(x) and Handy(x) -> Cyclonal(x))\nforall x (Handy(x) -> Alert(x))\n\nnot Barefooted(merilyn)\n\nHandy(merilyn) and forall x (Handy(x) -> Alert(x)) -> therefore Alert(merilyn) Handy(merilyn) and forall x (Handy(x) -> Alert(x)) -> therefore Alert(merilyn) Alert(merilyn) and Handy(merilyn) and forall x (Alert(x) and Handy(x) -> Cyclonal(x)) -> therefore Cyclonal(merilyn) Alert(merilyn) and Cyclonal(merilyn) and forall x (Alert(x) and Cyclonal(x) -> Barefooted(x)) -> therefore Barefooted(merilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Hellene is civilised. If someone is permeant and gibbous then they are gutless. If someone is permeant and civilised then they are gibbous. If someone is civilised then they are permeant. Hellene is not quiet.", "logic": "\nCivilised(hellene)\nforall x (Permeant(x) and Gibbous(x) -> Gutless(x))\nforall x (Permeant(x) and Civilised(x) -> Gibbous(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Permeant(x))\n\nnot Quiet(hellene)\n\nnot Quiet(hellene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "Ola is untouched. If someone is grieving and autacoidal then they are cadaverous. If someone is grieving and untouched then they are autacoidal. If someone is untouched then they are grieving. Ola is cold.", "logic": "\nUntouched(ola)\nforall x (Grieving(x) and Autacoidal(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Grieving(x) and Untouched(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\nforall x (Untouched(x) -> Grieving(x))\n\nCold(ola)\n\nCold(ola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-695"} {"premises": "The conni is praising. All venomed, praising things are mammary. All avuncular, praising things are mammary. Cold, venomed things are mammary. All mammary, praising things are royal. If the conni is mammary then the conni is royal. All praising things are venomed. If the conni is royal and the conni is avuncular then the conni is not venomed. If the conni is avuncular and the conni is not praising then the conni is not venomed. The conni is praising.", "logic": "\nPraising(conni)\nforall x (Venomed(x) and Praising(x) -> Mammary(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and Praising(x) -> Mammary(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and Venomed(x) -> Mammary(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) and Praising(x) -> Royal(x))\nMammary(conni) -> Royal(conni)\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Venomed(x))\nRoyal(conni) and Avuncular(conni) -> not Venomed(conni)\nAvuncular(conni) and not Praising(conni) -> not Venomed(conni)\n\nPraising(conni)\n\ntherefore Praising(conni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The dorie is mesmeric. All fated, mesmeric things are available. All sweptback, mesmeric things are available. Cold, fated things are available. All available, mesmeric things are opponent. If the dorie is available then the dorie is opponent. All mesmeric things are fated. If the dorie is opponent and the dorie is sweptback then the dorie is not fated. If the dorie is sweptback and the dorie is not mesmeric then the dorie is not fated. The dorie is not mesmeric.", "logic": "\nMesmeric(dorie)\nforall x (Fated(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and Fated(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Available(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> Opponent(x))\nAvailable(dorie) -> Opponent(dorie)\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) -> Fated(x))\nOpponent(dorie) and Sweptback(dorie) -> not Fated(dorie)\nSweptback(dorie) and not Mesmeric(dorie) -> not Fated(dorie)\n\nnot Mesmeric(dorie)\n\ntherefore Mesmeric(dorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The madonna is unctuous. All derelict, unctuous things are bankable. All freshman, unctuous things are bankable. Cold, derelict things are bankable. All bankable, unctuous things are extrusive. If the madonna is bankable then the madonna is extrusive. All unctuous things are derelict. If the madonna is extrusive and the madonna is freshman then the madonna is not derelict. If the madonna is freshman and the madonna is not unctuous then the madonna is not derelict. The madonna is derelict.", "logic": "\nUnctuous(madonna)\nforall x (Derelict(x) and Unctuous(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Freshman(x) and Unctuous(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Freshman(x) and Derelict(x) -> Bankable(x))\nforall x (Bankable(x) and Unctuous(x) -> Extrusive(x))\nBankable(madonna) -> Extrusive(madonna)\nforall x (Unctuous(x) -> Derelict(x))\nExtrusive(madonna) and Freshman(madonna) -> not Derelict(madonna)\nFreshman(madonna) and not Unctuous(madonna) -> not Derelict(madonna)\n\nDerelict(madonna)\n\nUnctuous(madonna) and forall x (Unctuous(x) -> Derelict(x)) -> therefore Derelict(madonna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The andonis is formulaic. All splenetic, formulaic things are pyretic. All inland, formulaic things are pyretic. Cold, splenetic things are pyretic. All pyretic, formulaic things are disposed. If the andonis is pyretic then the andonis is disposed. All formulaic things are splenetic. If the andonis is disposed and the andonis is inland then the andonis is not splenetic. If the andonis is inland and the andonis is not formulaic then the andonis is not splenetic. The andonis is not splenetic.", "logic": "\nFormulaic(andonis)\nforall x (Splenetic(x) and Formulaic(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) and Formulaic(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) and Splenetic(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nforall x (Pyretic(x) and Formulaic(x) -> Disposed(x))\nPyretic(andonis) -> Disposed(andonis)\nforall x (Formulaic(x) -> Splenetic(x))\nDisposed(andonis) and Inland(andonis) -> not Splenetic(andonis)\nInland(andonis) and not Formulaic(andonis) -> not Splenetic(andonis)\n\nnot Splenetic(andonis)\n\nFormulaic(andonis) and forall x (Formulaic(x) -> Splenetic(x)) -> therefore Splenetic(andonis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The mureil is grumpy. All indebted, grumpy things are crude. All straw, grumpy things are crude. Cold, indebted things are crude. All crude, grumpy things are favourite. If the mureil is crude then the mureil is favourite. All grumpy things are indebted. If the mureil is favourite and the mureil is straw then the mureil is not indebted. If the mureil is straw and the mureil is not grumpy then the mureil is not indebted. The mureil is crude.", "logic": "\nGrumpy(mureil)\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Grumpy(x) -> Crude(x))\nforall x (Straw(x) and Grumpy(x) -> Crude(x))\nforall x (Straw(x) and Indebted(x) -> Crude(x))\nforall x (Crude(x) and Grumpy(x) -> Favourite(x))\nCrude(mureil) -> Favourite(mureil)\nforall x (Grumpy(x) -> Indebted(x))\nFavourite(mureil) and Straw(mureil) -> not Indebted(mureil)\nStraw(mureil) and not Grumpy(mureil) -> not Indebted(mureil)\n\nCrude(mureil)\n\nGrumpy(mureil) and forall x (Grumpy(x) -> Indebted(x)) -> therefore Indebted(mureil) Indebted(mureil) and Grumpy(mureil) and forall x (Indebted(x) and Grumpy(x) -> Crude(x)) -> therefore Crude(mureil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The toni is sliced. All cozy, sliced things are inedible. All yonder, sliced things are inedible. Cold, cozy things are inedible. All inedible, sliced things are baccate. If the toni is inedible then the toni is baccate. All sliced things are cozy. If the toni is baccate and the toni is yonder then the toni is not cozy. If the toni is yonder and the toni is not sliced then the toni is not cozy. The toni is not inedible.", "logic": "\nSliced(toni)\nforall x (Cozy(x) and Sliced(x) -> Inedible(x))\nforall x (Yonder(x) and Sliced(x) -> Inedible(x))\nforall x (Yonder(x) and Cozy(x) -> Inedible(x))\nforall x (Inedible(x) and Sliced(x) -> Baccate(x))\nInedible(toni) -> Baccate(toni)\nforall x (Sliced(x) -> Cozy(x))\nBaccate(toni) and Yonder(toni) -> not Cozy(toni)\nYonder(toni) and not Sliced(toni) -> not Cozy(toni)\n\nnot Inedible(toni)\n\nSliced(toni) and forall x (Sliced(x) -> Cozy(x)) -> therefore Cozy(toni) Cozy(toni) and Sliced(toni) and forall x (Cozy(x) and Sliced(x) -> Inedible(x)) -> therefore Inedible(toni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The morna is baptismal. All shipshape, baptismal things are anicteric. All lvii, baptismal things are anicteric. Cold, shipshape things are anicteric. All anicteric, baptismal things are unfruitful. If the morna is anicteric then the morna is unfruitful. All baptismal things are shipshape. If the morna is unfruitful and the morna is lvii then the morna is not shipshape. If the morna is lvii and the morna is not baptismal then the morna is not shipshape. The morna is unfruitful.", "logic": "\nBaptismal(morna)\nforall x (Shipshape(x) and Baptismal(x) -> Anicteric(x))\nforall x (Lvii(x) and Baptismal(x) -> Anicteric(x))\nforall x (Lvii(x) and Shipshape(x) -> Anicteric(x))\nforall x (Anicteric(x) and Baptismal(x) -> Unfruitful(x))\nAnicteric(morna) -> Unfruitful(morna)\nforall x (Baptismal(x) -> Shipshape(x))\nUnfruitful(morna) and Lvii(morna) -> not Shipshape(morna)\nLvii(morna) and not Baptismal(morna) -> not Shipshape(morna)\n\nUnfruitful(morna)\n\nBaptismal(morna) and forall x (Baptismal(x) -> Shipshape(x)) -> therefore Shipshape(morna) Shipshape(morna) and Baptismal(morna) and forall x (Shipshape(x) and Baptismal(x) -> Anicteric(x)) -> therefore Anicteric(morna) Anicteric(morna) and Anicteric(morna) -> Unfruitful(morna) -> therefore Unfruitful(morna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The teodoro is tsarist. All paleozoic, tsarist things are rightish. All aboulic, tsarist things are rightish. Cold, paleozoic things are rightish. All rightish, tsarist things are unaffixed. If the teodoro is rightish then the teodoro is unaffixed. All tsarist things are paleozoic. If the teodoro is unaffixed and the teodoro is aboulic then the teodoro is not paleozoic. If the teodoro is aboulic and the teodoro is not tsarist then the teodoro is not paleozoic. The teodoro is not unaffixed.", "logic": "\nTsarist(teodoro)\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) and Tsarist(x) -> Rightish(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) and Tsarist(x) -> Rightish(x))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) and Paleozoic(x) -> Rightish(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) and Tsarist(x) -> Unaffixed(x))\nRightish(teodoro) -> Unaffixed(teodoro)\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nUnaffixed(teodoro) and Aboulic(teodoro) -> not Paleozoic(teodoro)\nAboulic(teodoro) and not Tsarist(teodoro) -> not Paleozoic(teodoro)\n\nnot Unaffixed(teodoro)\n\nTsarist(teodoro) and forall x (Tsarist(x) -> Paleozoic(x)) -> therefore Paleozoic(teodoro) Paleozoic(teodoro) and Tsarist(teodoro) and forall x (Paleozoic(x) and Tsarist(x) -> Rightish(x)) -> therefore Rightish(teodoro) Rightish(teodoro) and Rightish(teodoro) -> Unaffixed(teodoro) -> therefore Unaffixed(teodoro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The herbie is antique. All zambian, antique things are fourscore. All noncurrent, antique things are fourscore. Cold, zambian things are fourscore. All fourscore, antique things are sporadic. If the herbie is fourscore then the herbie is sporadic. All antique things are zambian. If the herbie is sporadic and the herbie is noncurrent then the herbie is not zambian. If the herbie is noncurrent and the herbie is not antique then the herbie is not zambian. The herbie is not noncurrent.", "logic": "\nAntique(herbie)\nforall x (Zambian(x) and Antique(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) and Antique(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) and Zambian(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Antique(x) -> Sporadic(x))\nFourscore(herbie) -> Sporadic(herbie)\nforall x (Antique(x) -> Zambian(x))\nSporadic(herbie) and Noncurrent(herbie) -> not Zambian(herbie)\nNoncurrent(herbie) and not Antique(herbie) -> not Zambian(herbie)\n\nnot Noncurrent(herbie)\n\nnot Noncurrent(herbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The janifer is juicy. All miry, juicy things are narrative. All hackneyed, juicy things are narrative. Cold, miry things are narrative. All narrative, juicy things are shadowed. If the janifer is narrative then the janifer is shadowed. All juicy things are miry. If the janifer is shadowed and the janifer is hackneyed then the janifer is not miry. If the janifer is hackneyed and the janifer is not juicy then the janifer is not miry. The janifer sees the janifer.", "logic": "\nJuicy(janifer)\nforall x (Miry(x) and Juicy(x) -> Narrative(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) and Juicy(x) -> Narrative(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) and Miry(x) -> Narrative(x))\nforall x (Narrative(x) and Juicy(x) -> Shadowed(x))\nNarrative(janifer) -> Shadowed(janifer)\nforall x (Juicy(x) -> Miry(x))\nShadowed(janifer) and Hackneyed(janifer) -> not Miry(janifer)\nHackneyed(janifer) and not Juicy(janifer) -> not Miry(janifer)\n\nSees(janifer, janifer)\n\nSees(janifer, janifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The maureene is agrestic. All hebraical, agrestic things are fervid. All sheared, agrestic things are fervid. Cold, hebraical things are fervid. All fervid, agrestic things are slicked. If the maureene is fervid then the maureene is slicked. All agrestic things are hebraical. If the maureene is slicked and the maureene is sheared then the maureene is not hebraical. If the maureene is sheared and the maureene is not agrestic then the maureene is not hebraical. The maureene does not need the maureene.", "logic": "\nAgrestic(maureene)\nforall x (Hebraical(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and Hebraical(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Fervid(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Slicked(x))\nFervid(maureene) -> Slicked(maureene)\nforall x (Agrestic(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nSlicked(maureene) and Sheared(maureene) -> not Hebraical(maureene)\nSheared(maureene) and not Agrestic(maureene) -> not Hebraical(maureene)\n\nnot Needs(maureene, maureene)\n\nnot Needs(maureene, maureene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "The theressa is lancinate. All calyptrate, lancinate things are ghostly. All gnarled, lancinate things are ghostly. Cold, calyptrate things are ghostly. All ghostly, lancinate things are shorthand. If the theressa is ghostly then the theressa is shorthand. All lancinate things are calyptrate. If the theressa is shorthand and the theressa is gnarled then the theressa is not calyptrate. If the theressa is gnarled and the theressa is not lancinate then the theressa is not calyptrate. The theressa likes the theressa.", "logic": "\nLancinate(theressa)\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) and Lancinate(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) and Lancinate(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) and Calyptrate(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) and Lancinate(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nGhostly(theressa) -> Shorthand(theressa)\nforall x (Lancinate(x) -> Calyptrate(x))\nShorthand(theressa) and Gnarled(theressa) -> not Calyptrate(theressa)\nGnarled(theressa) and not Lancinate(theressa) -> not Calyptrate(theressa)\n\nLikes(theressa, theressa)\n\nLikes(theressa, theressa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-711"} {"premises": "Tonia is softening. Ulric is caruncular. Bernie is deafened. Gracie is both. If something is softening then it is both. Smart, caruncular things are softening. If something is increased and corbelled then it is softening. If Gracie is increased and Gracie is deafened then Gracie is both. All both things are increased. All increased, softening things are deafened. Gracie is both.", "logic": "\nSoftening(tonia)\nCaruncular(ulric)\nDeafened(bernie)\nBoth(gracie)\nforall x (Softening(x) -> Both(x))\nforall x (Both(x) and Caruncular(x) -> Softening(x))\nforall x (Increased(x) and Corbelled(x) -> Softening(x))\nIncreased(gracie) and Deafened(gracie) -> Both(gracie)\nforall x (Both(x) -> Increased(x))\nforall x (Increased(x) and Softening(x) -> Deafened(x))\n\nBoth(gracie)\n\ntherefore Both(gracie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Zandra is incurved. Kenton is frenetic. Bartel is iraqi. Darcie is sissyish. If something is incurved then it is sissyish. Smart, frenetic things are incurved. If something is lucifugous and invidious then it is incurved. If Darcie is lucifugous and Darcie is iraqi then Darcie is sissyish. All sissyish things are lucifugous. All lucifugous, incurved things are iraqi. Zandra is not incurved.", "logic": "\nIncurved(zandra)\nFrenetic(kenton)\nIraqi(bartel)\nSissyish(darcie)\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Sissyish(x))\nforall x (Sissyish(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) and Invidious(x) -> Incurved(x))\nLucifugous(darcie) and Iraqi(darcie) -> Sissyish(darcie)\nforall x (Sissyish(x) -> Lucifugous(x))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) and Incurved(x) -> Iraqi(x))\n\nnot Incurved(zandra)\n\ntherefore Incurved(zandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Fran is hebrew. Dolly is fossilized. Celeste is bulbed. Bellina is grapelike. If something is hebrew then it is grapelike. Smart, fossilized things are hebrew. If something is bicolor and captious then it is hebrew. If Bellina is bicolor and Bellina is bulbed then Bellina is grapelike. All grapelike things are bicolor. All bicolor, hebrew things are bulbed. Bellina is bicolor.", "logic": "\nHebrew(fran)\nFossilized(dolly)\nBulbed(celeste)\nGrapelike(bellina)\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Grapelike(x))\nforall x (Grapelike(x) and Fossilized(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Captious(x) -> Hebrew(x))\nBicolor(bellina) and Bulbed(bellina) -> Grapelike(bellina)\nforall x (Grapelike(x) -> Bicolor(x))\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Bulbed(x))\n\nBicolor(bellina)\n\nGrapelike(bellina) and forall x (Grapelike(x) -> Bicolor(x)) -> therefore Bicolor(bellina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Clement is functional. Anni is derived. Valeda is vestmental. Mufinella is starring. If something is functional then it is starring. Smart, derived things are functional. If something is crushed and undreamt then it is functional. If Mufinella is crushed and Mufinella is vestmental then Mufinella is starring. All starring things are crushed. All crushed, functional things are vestmental. Mufinella is not crushed.", "logic": "\nFunctional(clement)\nDerived(anni)\nVestmental(valeda)\nStarring(mufinella)\nforall x (Functional(x) -> Starring(x))\nforall x (Starring(x) and Derived(x) -> Functional(x))\nforall x (Crushed(x) and Undreamt(x) -> Functional(x))\nCrushed(mufinella) and Vestmental(mufinella) -> Starring(mufinella)\nforall x (Starring(x) -> Crushed(x))\nforall x (Crushed(x) and Functional(x) -> Vestmental(x))\n\nnot Crushed(mufinella)\n\nStarring(mufinella) and forall x (Starring(x) -> Crushed(x)) -> therefore Crushed(mufinella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Kiele is betting. Joseph is circular. Nissy is graduate. Caroljean is blithe. If something is betting then it is blithe. Smart, circular things are betting. If something is wavelike and stannic then it is betting. If Caroljean is wavelike and Caroljean is graduate then Caroljean is blithe. All blithe things are wavelike. All wavelike, betting things are graduate. Kiele is wavelike.", "logic": "\nBetting(kiele)\nCircular(joseph)\nGraduate(nissy)\nBlithe(caroljean)\nforall x (Betting(x) -> Blithe(x))\nforall x (Blithe(x) and Circular(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and Stannic(x) -> Betting(x))\nWavelike(caroljean) and Graduate(caroljean) -> Blithe(caroljean)\nforall x (Blithe(x) -> Wavelike(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and Betting(x) -> Graduate(x))\n\nWavelike(kiele)\n\nBetting(kiele) and forall x (Betting(x) -> Blithe(x)) -> therefore Blithe(kiele) Blithe(kiele) and forall x (Blithe(x) -> Wavelike(x)) -> therefore Wavelike(kiele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Scotty is propitious. Essie is iberian. Otto is diarrhoeal. Grissel is boskopoid. If something is propitious then it is boskopoid. Smart, iberian things are propitious. If something is airborne and ropey then it is propitious. If Grissel is airborne and Grissel is diarrhoeal then Grissel is boskopoid. All boskopoid things are airborne. All airborne, propitious things are diarrhoeal. Scotty is not airborne.", "logic": "\nPropitious(scotty)\nIberian(essie)\nDiarrhoeal(otto)\nBoskopoid(grissel)\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) and Iberian(x) -> Propitious(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) and Ropey(x) -> Propitious(x))\nAirborne(grissel) and Diarrhoeal(grissel) -> Boskopoid(grissel)\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) and Propitious(x) -> Diarrhoeal(x))\n\nnot Airborne(scotty)\n\nPropitious(scotty) and forall x (Propitious(x) -> Boskopoid(x)) -> therefore Boskopoid(scotty) Boskopoid(scotty) and forall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Airborne(x)) -> therefore Airborne(scotty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Otes is sleeveless. Sarge is observant. Sasha is crisscross. Shirlee is impossible. If something is sleeveless then it is impossible. Smart, observant things are sleeveless. If something is overgreedy and seaworthy then it is sleeveless. If Shirlee is overgreedy and Shirlee is crisscross then Shirlee is impossible. All impossible things are overgreedy. All overgreedy, sleeveless things are crisscross. Otes is crisscross.", "logic": "\nSleeveless(otes)\nObservant(sarge)\nCrisscross(sasha)\nImpossible(shirlee)\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Impossible(x))\nforall x (Impossible(x) and Observant(x) -> Sleeveless(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) and Seaworthy(x) -> Sleeveless(x))\nOvergreedy(shirlee) and Crisscross(shirlee) -> Impossible(shirlee)\nforall x (Impossible(x) -> Overgreedy(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Crisscross(x))\n\nCrisscross(otes)\n\nSleeveless(otes) and forall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Impossible(x)) -> therefore Impossible(otes) Impossible(otes) and forall x (Impossible(x) -> Overgreedy(x)) -> therefore Overgreedy(otes) Overgreedy(otes) and Sleeveless(otes) and forall x (Overgreedy(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Crisscross(x)) -> therefore Crisscross(otes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Arabele is overcast. Grethel is symbolical. Joellen is ahorse. Conny is chemical. If something is overcast then it is chemical. Smart, symbolical things are overcast. If something is premature and servo then it is overcast. If Conny is premature and Conny is ahorse then Conny is chemical. All chemical things are premature. All premature, overcast things are ahorse. Arabele is not ahorse.", "logic": "\nOvercast(arabele)\nSymbolical(grethel)\nAhorse(joellen)\nChemical(conny)\nforall x (Overcast(x) -> Chemical(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) and Symbolical(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Premature(x) and Servo(x) -> Overcast(x))\nPremature(conny) and Ahorse(conny) -> Chemical(conny)\nforall x (Chemical(x) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Premature(x) and Overcast(x) -> Ahorse(x))\n\nnot Ahorse(arabele)\n\nOvercast(arabele) and forall x (Overcast(x) -> Chemical(x)) -> therefore Chemical(arabele) Chemical(arabele) and forall x (Chemical(x) -> Premature(x)) -> therefore Premature(arabele) Premature(arabele) and Overcast(arabele) and forall x (Premature(x) and Overcast(x) -> Ahorse(x)) -> therefore Ahorse(arabele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Lynnet is debatable. Avivah is germy. Zilvia is respondent. Partha is prostyle. If something is debatable then it is prostyle. Smart, germy things are debatable. If something is diarrheal and azonic then it is debatable. If Partha is diarrheal and Partha is respondent then Partha is prostyle. All prostyle things are diarrheal. All diarrheal, debatable things are respondent. Partha is not debatable.", "logic": "\nDebatable(lynnet)\nGermy(avivah)\nRespondent(zilvia)\nProstyle(partha)\nforall x (Debatable(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nforall x (Prostyle(x) and Germy(x) -> Debatable(x))\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) and Azonic(x) -> Debatable(x))\nDiarrheal(partha) and Respondent(partha) -> Prostyle(partha)\nforall x (Prostyle(x) -> Diarrheal(x))\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) and Debatable(x) -> Respondent(x))\n\nnot Debatable(partha)\n\nforall x (Prostyle(x) and Germy(x) -> Debatable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Cinnamon is ethnical. Edgar is salvadoran. Cherie is sanitized. Skelly is barbate. If something is ethnical then it is barbate. Smart, salvadoran things are ethnical. If something is sweet and scots then it is ethnical. If Skelly is sweet and Skelly is sanitized then Skelly is barbate. All barbate things are sweet. All sweet, ethnical things are sanitized. Cherie is barbate.", "logic": "\nEthnical(cinnamon)\nSalvadoran(edgar)\nSanitized(cherie)\nBarbate(skelly)\nforall x (Ethnical(x) -> Barbate(x))\nforall x (Barbate(x) and Salvadoran(x) -> Ethnical(x))\nforall x (Sweet(x) and Scots(x) -> Ethnical(x))\nSweet(skelly) and Sanitized(skelly) -> Barbate(skelly)\nforall x (Barbate(x) -> Sweet(x))\nforall x (Sweet(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Sanitized(x))\n\nBarbate(cherie)\n\nforall x (Ethnical(x) -> Barbate(x)) <- forall x (Barbate(x) and Salvadoran(x) -> Ethnical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Aubine is acerbic. Mela is vented. Norine is posh. Ariel is speckled. If something is acerbic then it is speckled. Smart, vented things are acerbic. If something is dacitic and canted then it is acerbic. If Ariel is dacitic and Ariel is posh then Ariel is speckled. All speckled things are dacitic. All dacitic, acerbic things are posh. Mela is not dacitic.", "logic": "\nAcerbic(aubine)\nVented(mela)\nPosh(norine)\nSpeckled(ariel)\nforall x (Acerbic(x) -> Speckled(x))\nforall x (Speckled(x) and Vented(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nforall x (Dacitic(x) and Canted(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nDacitic(ariel) and Posh(ariel) -> Speckled(ariel)\nforall x (Speckled(x) -> Dacitic(x))\nforall x (Dacitic(x) and Acerbic(x) -> Posh(x))\n\nnot Dacitic(mela)\n\nforall x (Speckled(x) -> Dacitic(x)) <- forall x (Acerbic(x) -> Speckled(x)) <- forall x (Speckled(x) and Vented(x) -> Acerbic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Channa is gassy. Fernande is altissimo. Agnes is ametropic. Barbara is eugenic. If something is gassy then it is eugenic. Smart, altissimo things are gassy. If something is analogous and general then it is gassy. If Barbara is analogous and Barbara is ametropic then Barbara is eugenic. All eugenic things are analogous. All analogous, gassy things are ametropic. Fernande is eugenic.", "logic": "\nGassy(channa)\nAltissimo(fernande)\nAmetropic(agnes)\nEugenic(barbara)\nforall x (Gassy(x) -> Eugenic(x))\nforall x (Eugenic(x) and Altissimo(x) -> Gassy(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) and General(x) -> Gassy(x))\nAnalogous(barbara) and Ametropic(barbara) -> Eugenic(barbara)\nforall x (Eugenic(x) -> Analogous(x))\nforall x (Analogous(x) and Gassy(x) -> Ametropic(x))\n\nEugenic(fernande)\n\nforall x (Gassy(x) -> Eugenic(x)) <- forall x (Eugenic(x) and Altissimo(x) -> Gassy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Tamera is submarine. Elga is tasselled. Merissa is arresting. Rana is demanding. If something is submarine then it is demanding. Smart, tasselled things are submarine. If something is chordate and ireful then it is submarine. If Rana is chordate and Rana is arresting then Rana is demanding. All demanding things are chordate. All chordate, submarine things are arresting. Elga is not ireful.", "logic": "\nSubmarine(tamera)\nTasselled(elga)\nArresting(merissa)\nDemanding(rana)\nforall x (Submarine(x) -> Demanding(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) and Tasselled(x) -> Submarine(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Ireful(x) -> Submarine(x))\nChordate(rana) and Arresting(rana) -> Demanding(rana)\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Chordate(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Submarine(x) -> Arresting(x))\n\nnot Ireful(elga)\n\nnot Ireful(elga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Francyne is uneasy. Mitzi is faithful. Rebekah is xerophytic. Petunia is inexact. If something is uneasy then it is inexact. Smart, faithful things are uneasy. If something is golden and wary then it is uneasy. If Petunia is golden and Petunia is xerophytic then Petunia is inexact. All inexact things are golden. All golden, uneasy things are xerophytic. Petunia is wary.", "logic": "\nUneasy(francyne)\nFaithful(mitzi)\nXerophytic(rebekah)\nInexact(petunia)\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Inexact(x))\nforall x (Inexact(x) and Faithful(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Golden(x) and Wary(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nGolden(petunia) and Xerophytic(petunia) -> Inexact(petunia)\nforall x (Inexact(x) -> Golden(x))\nforall x (Golden(x) and Uneasy(x) -> Xerophytic(x))\n\nWary(petunia)\n\nWary(petunia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Ashely is liliaceous. Alfredo is dewy. Stirling is bilinear. Riki is cackly. If something is liliaceous then it is cackly. Smart, dewy things are liliaceous. If something is unhumorous and shattering then it is liliaceous. If Riki is unhumorous and Riki is bilinear then Riki is cackly. All cackly things are unhumorous. All unhumorous, liliaceous things are bilinear. Riki is not cold.", "logic": "\nLiliaceous(ashely)\nDewy(alfredo)\nBilinear(stirling)\nCackly(riki)\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) -> Cackly(x))\nforall x (Cackly(x) and Dewy(x) -> Liliaceous(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) and Shattering(x) -> Liliaceous(x))\nUnhumorous(riki) and Bilinear(riki) -> Cackly(riki)\nforall x (Cackly(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) and Liliaceous(x) -> Bilinear(x))\n\nnot Cold(riki)\n\nnot Cold(riki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "Ansley is farming. Victoria is asian. Lukas is scary. Lisandra is diarrheal. If something is farming then it is diarrheal. Smart, asian things are farming. If something is satyric and glazed then it is farming. If Lisandra is satyric and Lisandra is scary then Lisandra is diarrheal. All diarrheal things are satyric. All satyric, farming things are scary. Lukas is glazed.", "logic": "\nFarming(ansley)\nAsian(victoria)\nScary(lukas)\nDiarrheal(lisandra)\nforall x (Farming(x) -> Diarrheal(x))\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) and Asian(x) -> Farming(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) and Glazed(x) -> Farming(x))\nSatyric(lisandra) and Scary(lisandra) -> Diarrheal(lisandra)\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) -> Satyric(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) and Farming(x) -> Scary(x))\n\nGlazed(lukas)\n\nGlazed(lukas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The jada recurve the skylar. The jada recurve the irina. The jada hose the skylar. The jada unyoke the skylar. The jada unyoke the irina. The skylar recurve the irina. The skylar is iconic. The skylar is childlike. The skylar hose the jada. The skylar unyoke the jada. The irina recurve the jada. The irina is lithic. The irina is iconic. The irina hose the jada. The irina hose the skylar. The irina unyoke the skylar. If someone unyoke the irina then the irina recurve the jada. If someone hose the irina and the irina hose the skylar then the irina recurve the skylar. If the skylar is wailing then the skylar recurve the irina. If someone hose the skylar and the skylar hose the jada then the jada is wailing. If the irina recurve the jada and the irina is childlike then the irina hose the skylar. If the jada unyoke the skylar and the jada unyoke the irina then the jada hose the irina. If someone is wailing and they need the irina then the irina recurve the skylar. If the irina is loyal then the irina recurve the skylar. The skylar recurve the irina.", "logic": "\nRecurve(jada, skylar)\nRecurve(jada, irina)\nHose(jada, skylar)\nUnyoke(jada, skylar)\nUnyoke(jada, irina)\nRecurve(skylar, irina)\nIconic(skylar)\nChildlike(skylar)\nHose(skylar, jada)\nUnyoke(skylar, jada)\nRecurve(irina, jada)\nLithic(irina)\nIconic(irina)\nHose(irina, jada)\nHose(irina, skylar)\nUnyoke(irina, skylar)\nforall x (Unyoke(x, irina) -> Recurve(irina, jada))\nforall x (Hose(x, irina) and Hose(irina, skylar) -> Recurve(irina, skylar))\nWailing(skylar) -> Recurve(skylar, irina)\nforall x (Hose(x, skylar) and Hose(skylar, jada) -> Wailing(jada))\nRecurve(irina, jada) and Childlike(irina) -> Hose(irina, skylar)\nUnyoke(jada, skylar) and Unyoke(jada, irina) -> Hose(jada, irina)\nforall x (Wailing(x) and Hose(x, irina) -> Recurve(irina, skylar))\nLoyal(irina) -> Recurve(irina, skylar)\n\nRecurve(skylar, irina)\n\ntherefore Recurve(skylar, irina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "The marjy configure the mella. The marjy configure the malissia. The marjy frolic the mella. The marjy jest the mella. The marjy jest the malissia. The mella configure the malissia. The mella is analogous. The mella is perturbing. The mella frolic the marjy. The mella jest the marjy. The malissia configure the marjy. The malissia is abused. The malissia is analogous. The malissia frolic the marjy. The malissia frolic the mella. The malissia jest the mella. If someone jest the malissia then the malissia configure the marjy. If someone frolic the malissia and the malissia frolic the mella then the malissia configure the mella. If the mella is wearing then the mella configure the malissia. If someone frolic the mella and the mella frolic the marjy then the marjy is wearing. If the malissia configure the marjy and the malissia is perturbing then the malissia frolic the mella. If the marjy jest the mella and the marjy jest the malissia then the marjy frolic the malissia. If someone is wearing and they need the malissia then the malissia configure the mella. If the malissia is sworn then the malissia configure the mella. The marjy does not eat the mella.", "logic": "\nConfigure(marjy, mella)\nConfigure(marjy, malissia)\nFrolic(marjy, mella)\nJest(marjy, mella)\nJest(marjy, malissia)\nConfigure(mella, malissia)\nAnalogous(mella)\nPerturbing(mella)\nFrolic(mella, marjy)\nJest(mella, marjy)\nConfigure(malissia, marjy)\nAbused(malissia)\nAnalogous(malissia)\nFrolic(malissia, marjy)\nFrolic(malissia, mella)\nJest(malissia, mella)\nforall x (Jest(x, malissia) -> Configure(malissia, marjy))\nforall x (Frolic(x, malissia) and Frolic(malissia, mella) -> Configure(malissia, mella))\nWearing(mella) -> Configure(mella, malissia)\nforall x (Frolic(x, mella) and Frolic(mella, marjy) -> Wearing(marjy))\nConfigure(malissia, marjy) and Perturbing(malissia) -> Frolic(malissia, mella)\nJest(marjy, mella) and Jest(marjy, malissia) -> Frolic(marjy, malissia)\nforall x (Wearing(x) and Frolic(x, malissia) -> Configure(malissia, mella))\nSworn(malissia) -> Configure(malissia, mella)\n\nnot Configure(marjy, mella)\n\ntherefore Configure(marjy, mella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "The wilfrid shove the dolores. The wilfrid shove the evanne. The wilfrid associate the dolores. The wilfrid unsanctify the dolores. The wilfrid unsanctify the evanne. The dolores shove the evanne. The dolores is acerbic. The dolores is ferric. The dolores associate the wilfrid. The dolores unsanctify the wilfrid. The evanne shove the wilfrid. The evanne is stoned. The evanne is acerbic. The evanne associate the wilfrid. The evanne associate the dolores. The evanne unsanctify the dolores. If someone unsanctify the evanne then the evanne shove the wilfrid. If someone associate the evanne and the evanne associate the dolores then the evanne shove the dolores. If the dolores is terefah then the dolores shove the evanne. If someone associate the dolores and the dolores associate the wilfrid then the wilfrid is terefah. If the evanne shove the wilfrid and the evanne is ferric then the evanne associate the dolores. If the wilfrid unsanctify the dolores and the wilfrid unsanctify the evanne then the wilfrid associate the evanne. If someone is terefah and they need the evanne then the evanne shove the dolores. If the evanne is unsnarled then the evanne shove the dolores. The wilfrid is terefah.", "logic": "\nShove(wilfrid, dolores)\nShove(wilfrid, evanne)\nAssociate(wilfrid, dolores)\nUnsanctify(wilfrid, dolores)\nUnsanctify(wilfrid, evanne)\nShove(dolores, evanne)\nAcerbic(dolores)\nFerric(dolores)\nAssociate(dolores, wilfrid)\nUnsanctify(dolores, wilfrid)\nShove(evanne, wilfrid)\nStoned(evanne)\nAcerbic(evanne)\nAssociate(evanne, wilfrid)\nAssociate(evanne, dolores)\nUnsanctify(evanne, dolores)\nforall x (Unsanctify(x, evanne) -> Shove(evanne, wilfrid))\nforall x (Associate(x, evanne) and Associate(evanne, dolores) -> Shove(evanne, dolores))\nTerefah(dolores) -> Shove(dolores, evanne)\nforall x (Associate(x, dolores) and Associate(dolores, wilfrid) -> Terefah(wilfrid))\nShove(evanne, wilfrid) and Ferric(evanne) -> Associate(evanne, dolores)\nUnsanctify(wilfrid, dolores) and Unsanctify(wilfrid, evanne) -> Associate(wilfrid, evanne)\nforall x (Terefah(x) and Associate(x, evanne) -> Shove(evanne, dolores))\nUnsnarled(evanne) -> Shove(evanne, dolores)\n\nTerefah(wilfrid)\n\nAssociate(evanne, dolores) and Associate(dolores, wilfrid) and forall x (Associate(x, dolores) and Associate(dolores, wilfrid) -> Terefah(wilfrid)) -> therefore Terefah(wilfrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "The malissa metalize the vikki. The malissa metalize the griff. The malissa heterodyne the vikki. The malissa bewray the vikki. The malissa bewray the griff. The vikki metalize the griff. The vikki is homologic. The vikki is bastard. The vikki heterodyne the malissa. The vikki bewray the malissa. The griff metalize the malissa. The griff is induced. The griff is homologic. The griff heterodyne the malissa. The griff heterodyne the vikki. The griff bewray the vikki. If someone bewray the griff then the griff metalize the malissa. If someone heterodyne the griff and the griff heterodyne the vikki then the griff metalize the vikki. If the vikki is minded then the vikki metalize the griff. If someone heterodyne the vikki and the vikki heterodyne the malissa then the malissa is minded. If the griff metalize the malissa and the griff is bastard then the griff heterodyne the vikki. If the malissa bewray the vikki and the malissa bewray the griff then the malissa heterodyne the griff. If someone is minded and they need the griff then the griff metalize the vikki. If the griff is harmonized then the griff metalize the vikki. The malissa is not minded.", "logic": "\nMetalize(malissa, vikki)\nMetalize(malissa, griff)\nHeterodyne(malissa, vikki)\nBewray(malissa, vikki)\nBewray(malissa, griff)\nMetalize(vikki, griff)\nHomologic(vikki)\nBastard(vikki)\nHeterodyne(vikki, malissa)\nBewray(vikki, malissa)\nMetalize(griff, malissa)\nInduced(griff)\nHomologic(griff)\nHeterodyne(griff, malissa)\nHeterodyne(griff, vikki)\nBewray(griff, vikki)\nforall x (Bewray(x, griff) -> Metalize(griff, malissa))\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, griff) and Heterodyne(griff, vikki) -> Metalize(griff, vikki))\nMinded(vikki) -> Metalize(vikki, griff)\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, vikki) and Heterodyne(vikki, malissa) -> Minded(malissa))\nMetalize(griff, malissa) and Bastard(griff) -> Heterodyne(griff, vikki)\nBewray(malissa, vikki) and Bewray(malissa, griff) -> Heterodyne(malissa, griff)\nforall x (Minded(x) and Heterodyne(x, griff) -> Metalize(griff, vikki))\nHarmonized(griff) -> Metalize(griff, vikki)\n\nnot Minded(malissa)\n\nHeterodyne(griff, vikki) and Heterodyne(vikki, malissa) and forall x (Heterodyne(x, vikki) and Heterodyne(vikki, malissa) -> Minded(malissa)) -> therefore Minded(malissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "The queenie premiere the miriam. The queenie premiere the orlando. The queenie virilise the miriam. The queenie splice the miriam. The queenie splice the orlando. The miriam premiere the orlando. The miriam is botswanan. The miriam is bonelike. The miriam virilise the queenie. The miriam splice the queenie. The orlando premiere the queenie. The orlando is phosphoric. The orlando is botswanan. The orlando virilise the queenie. The orlando virilise the miriam. The orlando splice the miriam. If someone splice the orlando then the orlando premiere the queenie. If someone virilise the orlando and the orlando virilise the miriam then the orlando premiere the miriam. If the miriam is acrogenic then the miriam premiere the orlando. If someone virilise the miriam and the miriam virilise the queenie then the queenie is acrogenic. If the orlando premiere the queenie and the orlando is bonelike then the orlando virilise the miriam. If the queenie splice the miriam and the queenie splice the orlando then the queenie virilise the orlando. If someone is acrogenic and they need the orlando then the orlando premiere the miriam. If the orlando is aerolitic then the orlando premiere the miriam. The miriam is not phosphoric.", "logic": "\nPremiere(queenie, miriam)\nPremiere(queenie, orlando)\nVirilise(queenie, miriam)\nSplice(queenie, miriam)\nSplice(queenie, orlando)\nPremiere(miriam, orlando)\nBotswanan(miriam)\nBonelike(miriam)\nVirilise(miriam, queenie)\nSplice(miriam, queenie)\nPremiere(orlando, queenie)\nPhosphoric(orlando)\nBotswanan(orlando)\nVirilise(orlando, queenie)\nVirilise(orlando, miriam)\nSplice(orlando, miriam)\nforall x (Splice(x, orlando) -> Premiere(orlando, queenie))\nforall x (Virilise(x, orlando) and Virilise(orlando, miriam) -> Premiere(orlando, miriam))\nAcrogenic(miriam) -> Premiere(miriam, orlando)\nforall x (Virilise(x, miriam) and Virilise(miriam, queenie) -> Acrogenic(queenie))\nPremiere(orlando, queenie) and Bonelike(orlando) -> Virilise(orlando, miriam)\nSplice(queenie, miriam) and Splice(queenie, orlando) -> Virilise(queenie, orlando)\nforall x (Acrogenic(x) and Virilise(x, orlando) -> Premiere(orlando, miriam))\nAerolitic(orlando) -> Premiere(orlando, miriam)\n\nnot Phosphoric(miriam)\n\nnot Phosphoric(miriam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "The deryl entice the sarette. The deryl entice the brant. The deryl object the sarette. The deryl bottle the sarette. The deryl bottle the brant. The sarette entice the brant. The sarette is biracial. The sarette is basilar. The sarette object the deryl. The sarette bottle the deryl. The brant entice the deryl. The brant is cushioned. The brant is biracial. The brant object the deryl. The brant object the sarette. The brant bottle the sarette. If someone bottle the brant then the brant entice the deryl. If someone object the brant and the brant object the sarette then the brant entice the sarette. If the sarette is improved then the sarette entice the brant. If someone object the sarette and the sarette object the deryl then the deryl is improved. If the brant entice the deryl and the brant is basilar then the brant object the sarette. If the deryl bottle the sarette and the deryl bottle the brant then the deryl object the brant. If someone is improved and they need the brant then the brant entice the sarette. If the brant is halting then the brant entice the sarette. The deryl bottle the deryl.", "logic": "\nEntice(deryl, sarette)\nEntice(deryl, brant)\nObject(deryl, sarette)\nBottle(deryl, sarette)\nBottle(deryl, brant)\nEntice(sarette, brant)\nBiracial(sarette)\nBasilar(sarette)\nObject(sarette, deryl)\nBottle(sarette, deryl)\nEntice(brant, deryl)\nCushioned(brant)\nBiracial(brant)\nObject(brant, deryl)\nObject(brant, sarette)\nBottle(brant, sarette)\nforall x (Bottle(x, brant) -> Entice(brant, deryl))\nforall x (Object(x, brant) and Object(brant, sarette) -> Entice(brant, sarette))\nImproved(sarette) -> Entice(sarette, brant)\nforall x (Object(x, sarette) and Object(sarette, deryl) -> Improved(deryl))\nEntice(brant, deryl) and Basilar(brant) -> Object(brant, sarette)\nBottle(deryl, sarette) and Bottle(deryl, brant) -> Object(deryl, brant)\nforall x (Improved(x) and Object(x, brant) -> Entice(brant, sarette))\nHalting(brant) -> Entice(brant, sarette)\n\nBottle(deryl, deryl)\n\nBottle(deryl, deryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "The mayor recurve the whitney. The mayor recurve the dahlia. The mayor rearrange the whitney. The mayor focalise the whitney. The mayor focalise the dahlia. The whitney recurve the dahlia. The whitney is lanate. The whitney is diazo. The whitney rearrange the mayor. The whitney focalise the mayor. The dahlia recurve the mayor. The dahlia is comate. The dahlia is lanate. The dahlia rearrange the mayor. The dahlia rearrange the whitney. The dahlia focalise the whitney. If someone focalise the dahlia then the dahlia recurve the mayor. If someone rearrange the dahlia and the dahlia rearrange the whitney then the dahlia recurve the whitney. If the whitney is unceasing then the whitney recurve the dahlia. If someone rearrange the whitney and the whitney rearrange the mayor then the mayor is unceasing. If the dahlia recurve the mayor and the dahlia is diazo then the dahlia rearrange the whitney. If the mayor focalise the whitney and the mayor focalise the dahlia then the mayor rearrange the dahlia. If someone is unceasing and they need the dahlia then the dahlia recurve the whitney. If the dahlia is exuberant then the dahlia recurve the whitney. The mayor is not diazo.", "logic": "\nRecurve(mayor, whitney)\nRecurve(mayor, dahlia)\nRearrange(mayor, whitney)\nFocalise(mayor, whitney)\nFocalise(mayor, dahlia)\nRecurve(whitney, dahlia)\nLanate(whitney)\nDiazo(whitney)\nRearrange(whitney, mayor)\nFocalise(whitney, mayor)\nRecurve(dahlia, mayor)\nComate(dahlia)\nLanate(dahlia)\nRearrange(dahlia, mayor)\nRearrange(dahlia, whitney)\nFocalise(dahlia, whitney)\nforall x (Focalise(x, dahlia) -> Recurve(dahlia, mayor))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, dahlia) and Rearrange(dahlia, whitney) -> Recurve(dahlia, whitney))\nUnceasing(whitney) -> Recurve(whitney, dahlia)\nforall x (Rearrange(x, whitney) and Rearrange(whitney, mayor) -> Unceasing(mayor))\nRecurve(dahlia, mayor) and Diazo(dahlia) -> Rearrange(dahlia, whitney)\nFocalise(mayor, whitney) and Focalise(mayor, dahlia) -> Rearrange(mayor, dahlia)\nforall x (Unceasing(x) and Rearrange(x, dahlia) -> Recurve(dahlia, whitney))\nExuberant(dahlia) -> Recurve(dahlia, whitney)\n\nnot Diazo(mayor)\n\nnot Diazo(mayor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "The joete sharpen the dolli. The joete sharpen the phedra. The joete vent the dolli. The joete deforest the dolli. The joete deforest the phedra. The dolli sharpen the phedra. The dolli is anoestrous. The dolli is uneasy. The dolli vent the joete. The dolli deforest the joete. The phedra sharpen the joete. The phedra is insensate. The phedra is anoestrous. The phedra vent the joete. The phedra vent the dolli. The phedra deforest the dolli. If someone deforest the phedra then the phedra sharpen the joete. If someone vent the phedra and the phedra vent the dolli then the phedra sharpen the dolli. If the dolli is misty then the dolli sharpen the phedra. If someone vent the dolli and the dolli vent the joete then the joete is misty. If the phedra sharpen the joete and the phedra is uneasy then the phedra vent the dolli. If the joete deforest the dolli and the joete deforest the phedra then the joete vent the phedra. If someone is misty and they need the phedra then the phedra sharpen the dolli. If the phedra is instant then the phedra sharpen the dolli. The joete is insensate.", "logic": "\nSharpen(joete, dolli)\nSharpen(joete, phedra)\nVent(joete, dolli)\nDeforest(joete, dolli)\nDeforest(joete, phedra)\nSharpen(dolli, phedra)\nAnoestrous(dolli)\nUneasy(dolli)\nVent(dolli, joete)\nDeforest(dolli, joete)\nSharpen(phedra, joete)\nInsensate(phedra)\nAnoestrous(phedra)\nVent(phedra, joete)\nVent(phedra, dolli)\nDeforest(phedra, dolli)\nforall x (Deforest(x, phedra) -> Sharpen(phedra, joete))\nforall x (Vent(x, phedra) and Vent(phedra, dolli) -> Sharpen(phedra, dolli))\nMisty(dolli) -> Sharpen(dolli, phedra)\nforall x (Vent(x, dolli) and Vent(dolli, joete) -> Misty(joete))\nSharpen(phedra, joete) and Uneasy(phedra) -> Vent(phedra, dolli)\nDeforest(joete, dolli) and Deforest(joete, phedra) -> Vent(joete, phedra)\nforall x (Misty(x) and Vent(x, phedra) -> Sharpen(phedra, dolli))\nInstant(phedra) -> Sharpen(phedra, dolli)\n\nInsensate(joete)\n\nInsensate(joete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1777"} {"premises": "Karalynn is unmanned. Editha is not micropylar. Berchtold is legendary. Harrold is micropylar. Smart things are not forty. All induced, mendacious things are not forty. All mendacious, yokelish things are not forty. If Harrold is yokelish and Harrold is forty then Harrold is induced. Young things are yokelish. If Karalynn is not micropylar and Karalynn is not legendary then Karalynn is not forty. If something is forty and legendary then it is not unmanned. If something is micropylar then it is induced. Berchtold is legendary.", "logic": "\nUnmanned(karalynn)\nnot Micropylar(editha)\nLegendary(berchtold)\nMicropylar(harrold)\nforall x (Yokelish(x) -> not Forty(x))\nforall x (Induced(x) and Mendacious(x) -> not Forty(x))\nforall x (Mendacious(x) and Yokelish(x) -> not Forty(x))\nYokelish(harrold) and Forty(harrold) -> Induced(harrold)\nforall x (Induced(x) -> Yokelish(x))\nnot Micropylar(karalynn) and not Legendary(karalynn) -> not Forty(karalynn)\nforall x (Forty(x) and Legendary(x) -> not Unmanned(x))\nforall x (Micropylar(x) -> Induced(x))\n\nLegendary(berchtold)\n\ntherefore Legendary(berchtold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Gertrude is jawless. Bella is not liquescent. Sheril is stricken. Todd is liquescent. Smart things are not manly. All stannous, mangled things are not manly. All mangled, horrifying things are not manly. If Todd is horrifying and Todd is manly then Todd is stannous. Young things are horrifying. If Gertrude is not liquescent and Gertrude is not stricken then Gertrude is not manly. If something is manly and stricken then it is not jawless. If something is liquescent then it is stannous. Todd is not liquescent.", "logic": "\nJawless(gertrude)\nnot Liquescent(bella)\nStricken(sheril)\nLiquescent(todd)\nforall x (Horrifying(x) -> not Manly(x))\nforall x (Stannous(x) and Mangled(x) -> not Manly(x))\nforall x (Mangled(x) and Horrifying(x) -> not Manly(x))\nHorrifying(todd) and Manly(todd) -> Stannous(todd)\nforall x (Stannous(x) -> Horrifying(x))\nnot Liquescent(gertrude) and not Stricken(gertrude) -> not Manly(gertrude)\nforall x (Manly(x) and Stricken(x) -> not Jawless(x))\nforall x (Liquescent(x) -> Stannous(x))\n\nnot Liquescent(todd)\n\ntherefore Liquescent(todd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Tabbi is agraphic. Odilia is not boxlike. Callida is chorionic. Marcille is boxlike. Smart things are not tucked. All anthropoid, civil things are not tucked. All civil, scurrilous things are not tucked. If Marcille is scurrilous and Marcille is tucked then Marcille is anthropoid. Young things are scurrilous. If Tabbi is not boxlike and Tabbi is not chorionic then Tabbi is not tucked. If something is tucked and chorionic then it is not agraphic. If something is boxlike then it is anthropoid. Marcille is anthropoid.", "logic": "\nAgraphic(tabbi)\nnot Boxlike(odilia)\nChorionic(callida)\nBoxlike(marcille)\nforall x (Scurrilous(x) -> not Tucked(x))\nforall x (Anthropoid(x) and Civil(x) -> not Tucked(x))\nforall x (Civil(x) and Scurrilous(x) -> not Tucked(x))\nScurrilous(marcille) and Tucked(marcille) -> Anthropoid(marcille)\nforall x (Anthropoid(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nnot Boxlike(tabbi) and not Chorionic(tabbi) -> not Tucked(tabbi)\nforall x (Tucked(x) and Chorionic(x) -> not Agraphic(x))\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Anthropoid(x))\n\nAnthropoid(marcille)\n\nBoxlike(marcille) and forall x (Boxlike(x) -> Anthropoid(x)) -> therefore Anthropoid(marcille)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Vina is damning. Kelsy is not oddish. Hymie is leering. Merle is oddish. Smart things are not prevenient. All unfueled, beforehand things are not prevenient. All beforehand, rifled things are not prevenient. If Merle is rifled and Merle is prevenient then Merle is unfueled. Young things are rifled. If Vina is not oddish and Vina is not leering then Vina is not prevenient. If something is prevenient and leering then it is not damning. If something is oddish then it is unfueled. Merle is not unfueled.", "logic": "\nDamning(vina)\nnot Oddish(kelsy)\nLeering(hymie)\nOddish(merle)\nforall x (Rifled(x) -> not Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and Beforehand(x) -> not Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Beforehand(x) and Rifled(x) -> not Prevenient(x))\nRifled(merle) and Prevenient(merle) -> Unfueled(merle)\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Rifled(x))\nnot Oddish(vina) and not Leering(vina) -> not Prevenient(vina)\nforall x (Prevenient(x) and Leering(x) -> not Damning(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Unfueled(x))\n\nnot Unfueled(merle)\n\nOddish(merle) and forall x (Oddish(x) -> Unfueled(x)) -> therefore Unfueled(merle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Harrold is exonerated. Cristina is not wayfaring. Meara is comose. Morna is wayfaring. Smart things are not dexterous. All stung, zesty things are not dexterous. All zesty, encircling things are not dexterous. If Morna is encircling and Morna is dexterous then Morna is stung. Young things are encircling. If Harrold is not wayfaring and Harrold is not comose then Harrold is not dexterous. If something is dexterous and comose then it is not exonerated. If something is wayfaring then it is stung. Morna is encircling.", "logic": "\nExonerated(harrold)\nnot Wayfaring(cristina)\nComose(meara)\nWayfaring(morna)\nforall x (Encircling(x) -> not Dexterous(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) and Zesty(x) -> not Dexterous(x))\nforall x (Zesty(x) and Encircling(x) -> not Dexterous(x))\nEncircling(morna) and Dexterous(morna) -> Stung(morna)\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Encircling(x))\nnot Wayfaring(harrold) and not Comose(harrold) -> not Dexterous(harrold)\nforall x (Dexterous(x) and Comose(x) -> not Exonerated(x))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Stung(x))\n\nEncircling(morna)\n\nWayfaring(morna) and forall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Stung(x)) -> therefore Stung(morna) Stung(morna) and forall x (Stung(x) -> Encircling(x)) -> therefore Encircling(morna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Tina is undreamt. Camilla is not grovelling. Oswell is criterial. Rosalia is grovelling. Smart things are not airtight. All invidious, dissident things are not airtight. All dissident, abstract things are not airtight. If Rosalia is abstract and Rosalia is airtight then Rosalia is invidious. Young things are abstract. If Tina is not grovelling and Tina is not criterial then Tina is not airtight. If something is airtight and criterial then it is not undreamt. If something is grovelling then it is invidious. Rosalia is not abstract.", "logic": "\nUndreamt(tina)\nnot Grovelling(camilla)\nCriterial(oswell)\nGrovelling(rosalia)\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> not Airtight(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) and Dissident(x) -> not Airtight(x))\nforall x (Dissident(x) and Abstract(x) -> not Airtight(x))\nAbstract(rosalia) and Airtight(rosalia) -> Invidious(rosalia)\nforall x (Invidious(x) -> Abstract(x))\nnot Grovelling(tina) and not Criterial(tina) -> not Airtight(tina)\nforall x (Airtight(x) and Criterial(x) -> not Undreamt(x))\nforall x (Grovelling(x) -> Invidious(x))\n\nnot Abstract(rosalia)\n\nGrovelling(rosalia) and forall x (Grovelling(x) -> Invidious(x)) -> therefore Invidious(rosalia) Invidious(rosalia) and forall x (Invidious(x) -> Abstract(x)) -> therefore Abstract(rosalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Betsy is bettering. Doloritas is not placoid. Aveline is analeptic. Ursuline is placoid. Smart things are not totipotent. All sixtieth, ectodermal things are not totipotent. All ectodermal, trim things are not totipotent. If Ursuline is trim and Ursuline is totipotent then Ursuline is sixtieth. Young things are trim. If Betsy is not placoid and Betsy is not analeptic then Betsy is not totipotent. If something is totipotent and analeptic then it is not bettering. If something is placoid then it is sixtieth. Ursuline is not totipotent.", "logic": "\nBettering(betsy)\nnot Placoid(doloritas)\nAnaleptic(aveline)\nPlacoid(ursuline)\nforall x (Trim(x) -> not Totipotent(x))\nforall x (Sixtieth(x) and Ectodermal(x) -> not Totipotent(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Trim(x) -> not Totipotent(x))\nTrim(ursuline) and Totipotent(ursuline) -> Sixtieth(ursuline)\nforall x (Sixtieth(x) -> Trim(x))\nnot Placoid(betsy) and not Analeptic(betsy) -> not Totipotent(betsy)\nforall x (Totipotent(x) and Analeptic(x) -> not Bettering(x))\nforall x (Placoid(x) -> Sixtieth(x))\n\nnot Totipotent(ursuline)\n\nPlacoid(ursuline) and forall x (Placoid(x) -> Sixtieth(x)) -> therefore Sixtieth(ursuline) Sixtieth(ursuline) and forall x (Sixtieth(x) -> Trim(x)) -> therefore Trim(ursuline) Trim(ursuline) and forall x (Trim(x) -> not Totipotent(x)) -> therefore not Totipotent(ursuline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Sapphire is toilsome. Merrili is not vesical. Sile is occidental. Amos is vesical. Smart things are not depraved. All specular, imbecilic things are not depraved. All imbecilic, blooming things are not depraved. If Amos is blooming and Amos is depraved then Amos is specular. Young things are blooming. If Sapphire is not vesical and Sapphire is not occidental then Sapphire is not depraved. If something is depraved and occidental then it is not toilsome. If something is vesical then it is specular. Amos is depraved.", "logic": "\nToilsome(sapphire)\nnot Vesical(merrili)\nOccidental(sile)\nVesical(amos)\nforall x (Blooming(x) -> not Depraved(x))\nforall x (Specular(x) and Imbecilic(x) -> not Depraved(x))\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) and Blooming(x) -> not Depraved(x))\nBlooming(amos) and Depraved(amos) -> Specular(amos)\nforall x (Specular(x) -> Blooming(x))\nnot Vesical(sapphire) and not Occidental(sapphire) -> not Depraved(sapphire)\nforall x (Depraved(x) and Occidental(x) -> not Toilsome(x))\nforall x (Vesical(x) -> Specular(x))\n\nDepraved(amos)\n\nVesical(amos) and forall x (Vesical(x) -> Specular(x)) -> therefore Specular(amos) Specular(amos) and forall x (Specular(x) -> Blooming(x)) -> therefore Blooming(amos) Blooming(amos) and forall x (Blooming(x) -> not Depraved(x)) -> therefore not Depraved(amos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Zita is according. Abigael is not cloze. Carlye is glazed. Aloisia is cloze. Smart things are not elaborate. All scholarly, costate things are not elaborate. All costate, mesmeric things are not elaborate. If Aloisia is mesmeric and Aloisia is elaborate then Aloisia is scholarly. Young things are mesmeric. If Zita is not cloze and Zita is not glazed then Zita is not elaborate. If something is elaborate and glazed then it is not according. If something is cloze then it is scholarly. Carlye is not scholarly.", "logic": "\nAccording(zita)\nnot Cloze(abigael)\nGlazed(carlye)\nCloze(aloisia)\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) -> not Elaborate(x))\nforall x (Scholarly(x) and Costate(x) -> not Elaborate(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) and Mesmeric(x) -> not Elaborate(x))\nMesmeric(aloisia) and Elaborate(aloisia) -> Scholarly(aloisia)\nforall x (Scholarly(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nnot Cloze(zita) and not Glazed(zita) -> not Elaborate(zita)\nforall x (Elaborate(x) and Glazed(x) -> not According(x))\nforall x (Cloze(x) -> Scholarly(x))\n\nnot Scholarly(carlye)\n\nforall x (Cloze(x) -> Scholarly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Renard is stifled. Udall is not yucky. Ursola is hesitant. Adara is yucky. Smart things are not bush. All united, chatty things are not bush. All chatty, delimited things are not bush. If Adara is delimited and Adara is bush then Adara is united. Young things are delimited. If Renard is not yucky and Renard is not hesitant then Renard is not bush. If something is bush and hesitant then it is not stifled. If something is yucky then it is united. Renard is delimited.", "logic": "\nStifled(renard)\nnot Yucky(udall)\nHesitant(ursola)\nYucky(adara)\nforall x (Delimited(x) -> not Bush(x))\nforall x (United(x) and Chatty(x) -> not Bush(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) and Delimited(x) -> not Bush(x))\nDelimited(adara) and Bush(adara) -> United(adara)\nforall x (United(x) -> Delimited(x))\nnot Yucky(renard) and not Hesitant(renard) -> not Bush(renard)\nforall x (Bush(x) and Hesitant(x) -> not Stifled(x))\nforall x (Yucky(x) -> United(x))\n\nDelimited(renard)\n\nforall x (United(x) -> Delimited(x)) <- forall x (Yucky(x) -> United(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Jerry is unmown. Jacklin is not tuscan. Lysandra is cuprous. Laurene is tuscan. Smart things are not cercarial. All velar, brassbound things are not cercarial. All brassbound, pubescent things are not cercarial. If Laurene is pubescent and Laurene is cercarial then Laurene is velar. Young things are pubescent. If Jerry is not tuscan and Jerry is not cuprous then Jerry is not cercarial. If something is cercarial and cuprous then it is not unmown. If something is tuscan then it is velar. Lysandra is not pubescent.", "logic": "\nUnmown(jerry)\nnot Tuscan(jacklin)\nCuprous(lysandra)\nTuscan(laurene)\nforall x (Pubescent(x) -> not Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Velar(x) and Brassbound(x) -> not Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Brassbound(x) and Pubescent(x) -> not Cercarial(x))\nPubescent(laurene) and Cercarial(laurene) -> Velar(laurene)\nforall x (Velar(x) -> Pubescent(x))\nnot Tuscan(jerry) and not Cuprous(jerry) -> not Cercarial(jerry)\nforall x (Cercarial(x) and Cuprous(x) -> not Unmown(x))\nforall x (Tuscan(x) -> Velar(x))\n\nnot Pubescent(lysandra)\n\nforall x (Velar(x) -> Pubescent(x)) <- forall x (Tuscan(x) -> Velar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Ansel is precise. Aileen is not tuxedoed. Tatum is cursory. Cybill is tuxedoed. Smart things are not blest. All draped, bifid things are not blest. All bifid, polluted things are not blest. If Cybill is polluted and Cybill is blest then Cybill is draped. Young things are polluted. If Ansel is not tuxedoed and Ansel is not cursory then Ansel is not blest. If something is blest and cursory then it is not precise. If something is tuxedoed then it is draped. Aileen is polluted.", "logic": "\nPrecise(ansel)\nnot Tuxedoed(aileen)\nCursory(tatum)\nTuxedoed(cybill)\nforall x (Polluted(x) -> not Blest(x))\nforall x (Draped(x) and Bifid(x) -> not Blest(x))\nforall x (Bifid(x) and Polluted(x) -> not Blest(x))\nPolluted(cybill) and Blest(cybill) -> Draped(cybill)\nforall x (Draped(x) -> Polluted(x))\nnot Tuxedoed(ansel) and not Cursory(ansel) -> not Blest(ansel)\nforall x (Blest(x) and Cursory(x) -> not Precise(x))\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> Draped(x))\n\nPolluted(aileen)\n\nforall x (Draped(x) -> Polluted(x)) <- forall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> Draped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Roana is refreshed. Carlina is not roily. Gloriane is cereal. Olin is roily. Smart things are not engorged. All phoney, leakproof things are not engorged. All leakproof, scripted things are not engorged. If Olin is scripted and Olin is engorged then Olin is phoney. Young things are scripted. If Roana is not roily and Roana is not cereal then Roana is not engorged. If something is engorged and cereal then it is not refreshed. If something is roily then it is phoney. Carlina is not cereal.", "logic": "\nRefreshed(roana)\nnot Roily(carlina)\nCereal(gloriane)\nRoily(olin)\nforall x (Scripted(x) -> not Engorged(x))\nforall x (Phoney(x) and Leakproof(x) -> not Engorged(x))\nforall x (Leakproof(x) and Scripted(x) -> not Engorged(x))\nScripted(olin) and Engorged(olin) -> Phoney(olin)\nforall x (Phoney(x) -> Scripted(x))\nnot Roily(roana) and not Cereal(roana) -> not Engorged(roana)\nforall x (Engorged(x) and Cereal(x) -> not Refreshed(x))\nforall x (Roily(x) -> Phoney(x))\n\nnot Cereal(carlina)\n\nnot Cereal(carlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Zelma is nonaged. Allen is not matutinal. Rani is clubable. Emil is matutinal. Smart things are not generous. All lowset, occult things are not generous. All occult, synthetic things are not generous. If Emil is synthetic and Emil is generous then Emil is lowset. Young things are synthetic. If Zelma is not matutinal and Zelma is not clubable then Zelma is not generous. If something is generous and clubable then it is not nonaged. If something is matutinal then it is lowset. Zelma is matutinal.", "logic": "\nNonaged(zelma)\nnot Matutinal(allen)\nClubable(rani)\nMatutinal(emil)\nforall x (Synthetic(x) -> not Generous(x))\nforall x (Lowset(x) and Occult(x) -> not Generous(x))\nforall x (Occult(x) and Synthetic(x) -> not Generous(x))\nSynthetic(emil) and Generous(emil) -> Lowset(emil)\nforall x (Lowset(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nnot Matutinal(zelma) and not Clubable(zelma) -> not Generous(zelma)\nforall x (Generous(x) and Clubable(x) -> not Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Matutinal(x) -> Lowset(x))\n\nMatutinal(zelma)\n\nMatutinal(zelma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Jeffie is infamous. Eleanore is not aerobic. Yovonnda is graven. Trista is aerobic. Smart things are not unseeyn. All hokey, advance things are not unseeyn. All advance, capsular things are not unseeyn. If Trista is capsular and Trista is unseeyn then Trista is hokey. Young things are capsular. If Jeffie is not aerobic and Jeffie is not graven then Jeffie is not unseeyn. If something is unseeyn and graven then it is not infamous. If something is aerobic then it is hokey. Eleanore is not advance.", "logic": "\nInfamous(jeffie)\nnot Aerobic(eleanore)\nGraven(yovonnda)\nAerobic(trista)\nforall x (Capsular(x) -> not Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Hokey(x) and Advance(x) -> not Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Advance(x) and Capsular(x) -> not Unseeyn(x))\nCapsular(trista) and Unseeyn(trista) -> Hokey(trista)\nforall x (Hokey(x) -> Capsular(x))\nnot Aerobic(jeffie) and not Graven(jeffie) -> not Unseeyn(jeffie)\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) and Graven(x) -> not Infamous(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Hokey(x))\n\nnot Advance(eleanore)\n\nnot Advance(eleanore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "Briny is insidious. Annabella is not prurient. Ruperta is biggish. Bell is prurient. Smart things are not infected. All executed, indelicate things are not infected. All indelicate, separative things are not infected. If Bell is separative and Bell is infected then Bell is executed. Young things are separative. If Briny is not prurient and Briny is not biggish then Briny is not infected. If something is infected and biggish then it is not insidious. If something is prurient then it is executed. Ruperta is indelicate.", "logic": "\nInsidious(briny)\nnot Prurient(annabella)\nBiggish(ruperta)\nPrurient(bell)\nforall x (Separative(x) -> not Infected(x))\nforall x (Executed(x) and Indelicate(x) -> not Infected(x))\nforall x (Indelicate(x) and Separative(x) -> not Infected(x))\nSeparative(bell) and Infected(bell) -> Executed(bell)\nforall x (Executed(x) -> Separative(x))\nnot Prurient(briny) and not Biggish(briny) -> not Infected(briny)\nforall x (Infected(x) and Biggish(x) -> not Insidious(x))\nforall x (Prurient(x) -> Executed(x))\n\nIndelicate(ruperta)\n\nIndelicate(ruperta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-76"} {"premises": "The jeffie excel the nita. The nita molt the jeffie. The cathi enrol the jeffie. If the nita is semite and the nita enrol the cathi then the nita is flighted. If someone enrol the cathi and the cathi enrol the jeffie then the cathi is flighted. If someone is princely then they chase the jeffie. If someone excel the nita then they visit the cathi. If someone molt the nita and they chase the cathi then the cathi molt the jeffie. All flighted, skilful people are mimic. If someone excel the cathi and the cathi enrol the jeffie then they visit the nita. If someone is flighted then they visit the nita. The nita molt the jeffie.", "logic": "\nExcel(jeffie, nita)\nMolt(nita, jeffie)\nEnrol(cathi, jeffie)\nSemite(nita) and Enrol(nita, cathi) -> Flighted(nita)\nforall x (Enrol(x, cathi) and Enrol(cathi, jeffie) -> Flighted(cathi))\nforall x (Princely(x) -> Molt(x, jeffie))\nforall x (Excel(x, nita) -> Enrol(x, cathi))\nforall x (Molt(x, nita) and Molt(x, cathi) -> Molt(cathi, jeffie))\nforall x (Flighted(x) and Skilful(x) -> Mimic(x))\nforall x (Excel(x, cathi) and Enrol(cathi, jeffie) -> Enrol(x, nita))\nforall x (Flighted(x) -> Enrol(x, nita))\n\nMolt(nita, jeffie)\n\ntherefore Molt(nita, jeffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The concordia admit the micky. The micky boast the concordia. The kerstin atomize the concordia. If the micky is pedagogic and the micky atomize the kerstin then the micky is hungry. If someone atomize the kerstin and the kerstin atomize the concordia then the kerstin is hungry. If someone is indefinite then they chase the concordia. If someone admit the micky then they visit the kerstin. If someone boast the micky and they chase the kerstin then the kerstin boast the concordia. All hungry, scopal people are offending. If someone admit the kerstin and the kerstin atomize the concordia then they visit the micky. If someone is hungry then they visit the micky. The kerstin does not visit the concordia.", "logic": "\nAdmit(concordia, micky)\nBoast(micky, concordia)\nAtomize(kerstin, concordia)\nPedagogic(micky) and Atomize(micky, kerstin) -> Hungry(micky)\nforall x (Atomize(x, kerstin) and Atomize(kerstin, concordia) -> Hungry(kerstin))\nforall x (Indefinite(x) -> Boast(x, concordia))\nforall x (Admit(x, micky) -> Atomize(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Boast(x, micky) and Boast(x, kerstin) -> Boast(kerstin, concordia))\nforall x (Hungry(x) and Scopal(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Admit(x, kerstin) and Atomize(kerstin, concordia) -> Atomize(x, micky))\nforall x (Hungry(x) -> Atomize(x, micky))\n\nnot Atomize(kerstin, concordia)\n\ntherefore Atomize(kerstin, concordia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The ehud oblige the alford. The alford hymn the ehud. The sterne saddle the ehud. If the alford is floccose and the alford saddle the sterne then the alford is steepish. If someone saddle the sterne and the sterne saddle the ehud then the sterne is steepish. If someone is bespoke then they chase the ehud. If someone oblige the alford then they visit the sterne. If someone hymn the alford and they chase the sterne then the sterne hymn the ehud. All steepish, wondrous people are nasty. If someone oblige the sterne and the sterne saddle the ehud then they visit the alford. If someone is steepish then they visit the alford. The ehud saddle the sterne.", "logic": "\nOblige(ehud, alford)\nHymn(alford, ehud)\nSaddle(sterne, ehud)\nFloccose(alford) and Saddle(alford, sterne) -> Steepish(alford)\nforall x (Saddle(x, sterne) and Saddle(sterne, ehud) -> Steepish(sterne))\nforall x (Bespoke(x) -> Hymn(x, ehud))\nforall x (Oblige(x, alford) -> Saddle(x, sterne))\nforall x (Hymn(x, alford) and Hymn(x, sterne) -> Hymn(sterne, ehud))\nforall x (Steepish(x) and Wondrous(x) -> Nasty(x))\nforall x (Oblige(x, sterne) and Saddle(sterne, ehud) -> Saddle(x, alford))\nforall x (Steepish(x) -> Saddle(x, alford))\n\nSaddle(ehud, sterne)\n\nOblige(ehud, alford) and forall x (Oblige(x, alford) -> Saddle(x, sterne)) -> therefore Saddle(ehud, sterne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The viviyan allocate the marissa. The marissa stymie the viviyan. The suzanna chirr the viviyan. If the marissa is defective and the marissa chirr the suzanna then the marissa is fluent. If someone chirr the suzanna and the suzanna chirr the viviyan then the suzanna is fluent. If someone is polydactyl then they chase the viviyan. If someone allocate the marissa then they visit the suzanna. If someone stymie the marissa and they chase the suzanna then the suzanna stymie the viviyan. All fluent, lxiv people are filthy. If someone allocate the suzanna and the suzanna chirr the viviyan then they visit the marissa. If someone is fluent then they visit the marissa. The viviyan does not visit the suzanna.", "logic": "\nAllocate(viviyan, marissa)\nStymie(marissa, viviyan)\nChirr(suzanna, viviyan)\nDefective(marissa) and Chirr(marissa, suzanna) -> Fluent(marissa)\nforall x (Chirr(x, suzanna) and Chirr(suzanna, viviyan) -> Fluent(suzanna))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Stymie(x, viviyan))\nforall x (Allocate(x, marissa) -> Chirr(x, suzanna))\nforall x (Stymie(x, marissa) and Stymie(x, suzanna) -> Stymie(suzanna, viviyan))\nforall x (Fluent(x) and Lxiv(x) -> Filthy(x))\nforall x (Allocate(x, suzanna) and Chirr(suzanna, viviyan) -> Chirr(x, marissa))\nforall x (Fluent(x) -> Chirr(x, marissa))\n\nnot Chirr(viviyan, suzanna)\n\nAllocate(viviyan, marissa) and forall x (Allocate(x, marissa) -> Chirr(x, suzanna)) -> therefore Chirr(viviyan, suzanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The myrtia resorb the diandra. The diandra interbreed the myrtia. The amabelle rout the myrtia. If the diandra is nisi and the diandra rout the amabelle then the diandra is nonlegal. If someone rout the amabelle and the amabelle rout the myrtia then the amabelle is nonlegal. If someone is exegetical then they chase the myrtia. If someone resorb the diandra then they visit the amabelle. If someone interbreed the diandra and they chase the amabelle then the amabelle interbreed the myrtia. All nonlegal, severable people are urbanized. If someone resorb the amabelle and the amabelle rout the myrtia then they visit the diandra. If someone is nonlegal then they visit the diandra. The amabelle is nonlegal.", "logic": "\nResorb(myrtia, diandra)\nInterbreed(diandra, myrtia)\nRout(amabelle, myrtia)\nNisi(diandra) and Rout(diandra, amabelle) -> Nonlegal(diandra)\nforall x (Rout(x, amabelle) and Rout(amabelle, myrtia) -> Nonlegal(amabelle))\nforall x (Exegetical(x) -> Interbreed(x, myrtia))\nforall x (Resorb(x, diandra) -> Rout(x, amabelle))\nforall x (Interbreed(x, diandra) and Interbreed(x, amabelle) -> Interbreed(amabelle, myrtia))\nforall x (Nonlegal(x) and Severable(x) -> Urbanized(x))\nforall x (Resorb(x, amabelle) and Rout(amabelle, myrtia) -> Rout(x, diandra))\nforall x (Nonlegal(x) -> Rout(x, diandra))\n\nNonlegal(amabelle)\n\nResorb(myrtia, diandra) and forall x (Resorb(x, diandra) -> Rout(x, amabelle)) -> therefore Rout(myrtia, amabelle) Rout(myrtia, amabelle) and Rout(amabelle, myrtia) and forall x (Rout(x, amabelle) and Rout(amabelle, myrtia) -> Nonlegal(amabelle)) -> therefore Nonlegal(amabelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The augusto globalise the oral. The oral balance the augusto. The rufus diagnose the augusto. If the oral is disastrous and the oral diagnose the rufus then the oral is slanted. If someone diagnose the rufus and the rufus diagnose the augusto then the rufus is slanted. If someone is unstrained then they chase the augusto. If someone globalise the oral then they visit the rufus. If someone balance the oral and they chase the rufus then the rufus balance the augusto. All slanted, dispirited people are specked. If someone globalise the rufus and the rufus diagnose the augusto then they visit the oral. If someone is slanted then they visit the oral. The rufus is not slanted.", "logic": "\nGlobalise(augusto, oral)\nBalance(oral, augusto)\nDiagnose(rufus, augusto)\nDisastrous(oral) and Diagnose(oral, rufus) -> Slanted(oral)\nforall x (Diagnose(x, rufus) and Diagnose(rufus, augusto) -> Slanted(rufus))\nforall x (Unstrained(x) -> Balance(x, augusto))\nforall x (Globalise(x, oral) -> Diagnose(x, rufus))\nforall x (Balance(x, oral) and Balance(x, rufus) -> Balance(rufus, augusto))\nforall x (Slanted(x) and Dispirited(x) -> Specked(x))\nforall x (Globalise(x, rufus) and Diagnose(rufus, augusto) -> Diagnose(x, oral))\nforall x (Slanted(x) -> Diagnose(x, oral))\n\nnot Slanted(rufus)\n\nGlobalise(augusto, oral) and forall x (Globalise(x, oral) -> Diagnose(x, rufus)) -> therefore Diagnose(augusto, rufus) Diagnose(augusto, rufus) and Diagnose(rufus, augusto) and forall x (Diagnose(x, rufus) and Diagnose(rufus, augusto) -> Slanted(rufus)) -> therefore Slanted(rufus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The cherish blitz the dede. The dede jest the cherish. The friedrick scowl the cherish. If the dede is runcinate and the dede scowl the friedrick then the dede is reversed. If someone scowl the friedrick and the friedrick scowl the cherish then the friedrick is reversed. If someone is figural then they chase the cherish. If someone blitz the dede then they visit the friedrick. If someone jest the dede and they chase the friedrick then the friedrick jest the cherish. All reversed, entrancing people are subacid. If someone blitz the friedrick and the friedrick scowl the cherish then they visit the dede. If someone is reversed then they visit the dede. The friedrick scowl the dede.", "logic": "\nBlitz(cherish, dede)\nJest(dede, cherish)\nScowl(friedrick, cherish)\nRuncinate(dede) and Scowl(dede, friedrick) -> Reversed(dede)\nforall x (Scowl(x, friedrick) and Scowl(friedrick, cherish) -> Reversed(friedrick))\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Jest(x, cherish))\nforall x (Blitz(x, dede) -> Scowl(x, friedrick))\nforall x (Jest(x, dede) and Jest(x, friedrick) -> Jest(friedrick, cherish))\nforall x (Reversed(x) and Entrancing(x) -> Subacid(x))\nforall x (Blitz(x, friedrick) and Scowl(friedrick, cherish) -> Scowl(x, dede))\nforall x (Reversed(x) -> Scowl(x, dede))\n\nScowl(friedrick, dede)\n\nBlitz(cherish, dede) and forall x (Blitz(x, dede) -> Scowl(x, friedrick)) -> therefore Scowl(cherish, friedrick) Scowl(cherish, friedrick) and Scowl(friedrick, cherish) and forall x (Scowl(x, friedrick) and Scowl(friedrick, cherish) -> Reversed(friedrick)) -> therefore Reversed(friedrick) Reversed(friedrick) and forall x (Reversed(x) -> Scowl(x, dede)) -> therefore Scowl(friedrick, dede)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The gavra yack the aurelia. The aurelia braille the gavra. The paulina costume the gavra. If the aurelia is jovian and the aurelia costume the paulina then the aurelia is chordal. If someone costume the paulina and the paulina costume the gavra then the paulina is chordal. If someone is monastic then they chase the gavra. If someone yack the aurelia then they visit the paulina. If someone braille the aurelia and they chase the paulina then the paulina braille the gavra. All chordal, hard people are master. If someone yack the paulina and the paulina costume the gavra then they visit the aurelia. If someone is chordal then they visit the aurelia. The paulina does not visit the aurelia.", "logic": "\nYack(gavra, aurelia)\nBraille(aurelia, gavra)\nCostume(paulina, gavra)\nJovian(aurelia) and Costume(aurelia, paulina) -> Chordal(aurelia)\nforall x (Costume(x, paulina) and Costume(paulina, gavra) -> Chordal(paulina))\nforall x (Monastic(x) -> Braille(x, gavra))\nforall x (Yack(x, aurelia) -> Costume(x, paulina))\nforall x (Braille(x, aurelia) and Braille(x, paulina) -> Braille(paulina, gavra))\nforall x (Chordal(x) and Hard(x) -> Master(x))\nforall x (Yack(x, paulina) and Costume(paulina, gavra) -> Costume(x, aurelia))\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> Costume(x, aurelia))\n\nnot Costume(paulina, aurelia)\n\nYack(gavra, aurelia) and forall x (Yack(x, aurelia) -> Costume(x, paulina)) -> therefore Costume(gavra, paulina) Costume(gavra, paulina) and Costume(paulina, gavra) and forall x (Costume(x, paulina) and Costume(paulina, gavra) -> Chordal(paulina)) -> therefore Chordal(paulina) Chordal(paulina) and forall x (Chordal(x) -> Costume(x, aurelia)) -> therefore Costume(paulina, aurelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The jerrilee titrate the gloriana. The gloriana swash the jerrilee. The engracia alcoholize the jerrilee. If the gloriana is marmoreal and the gloriana alcoholize the engracia then the gloriana is oleophilic. If someone alcoholize the engracia and the engracia alcoholize the jerrilee then the engracia is oleophilic. If someone is slaveless then they chase the jerrilee. If someone titrate the gloriana then they visit the engracia. If someone swash the gloriana and they chase the engracia then the engracia swash the jerrilee. All oleophilic, taunting people are saved. If someone titrate the engracia and the engracia alcoholize the jerrilee then they visit the gloriana. If someone is oleophilic then they visit the gloriana. The engracia is not saved.", "logic": "\nTitrate(jerrilee, gloriana)\nSwash(gloriana, jerrilee)\nAlcoholize(engracia, jerrilee)\nMarmoreal(gloriana) and Alcoholize(gloriana, engracia) -> Oleophilic(gloriana)\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, engracia) and Alcoholize(engracia, jerrilee) -> Oleophilic(engracia))\nforall x (Slaveless(x) -> Swash(x, jerrilee))\nforall x (Titrate(x, gloriana) -> Alcoholize(x, engracia))\nforall x (Swash(x, gloriana) and Swash(x, engracia) -> Swash(engracia, jerrilee))\nforall x (Oleophilic(x) and Taunting(x) -> Saved(x))\nforall x (Titrate(x, engracia) and Alcoholize(engracia, jerrilee) -> Alcoholize(x, gloriana))\nforall x (Oleophilic(x) -> Alcoholize(x, gloriana))\n\nnot Saved(engracia)\n\nforall x (Oleophilic(x) and Taunting(x) -> Saved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The greg snore the peyton. The peyton equalise the greg. The yance raffle the greg. If the peyton is uncoloured and the peyton raffle the yance then the peyton is apothecial. If someone raffle the yance and the yance raffle the greg then the yance is apothecial. If someone is elongated then they chase the greg. If someone snore the peyton then they visit the yance. If someone equalise the peyton and they chase the yance then the yance equalise the greg. All apothecial, farming people are appraising. If someone snore the yance and the yance raffle the greg then they visit the peyton. If someone is apothecial then they visit the peyton. The greg is appraising.", "logic": "\nSnore(greg, peyton)\nEqualise(peyton, greg)\nRaffle(yance, greg)\nUncoloured(peyton) and Raffle(peyton, yance) -> Apothecial(peyton)\nforall x (Raffle(x, yance) and Raffle(yance, greg) -> Apothecial(yance))\nforall x (Elongated(x) -> Equalise(x, greg))\nforall x (Snore(x, peyton) -> Raffle(x, yance))\nforall x (Equalise(x, peyton) and Equalise(x, yance) -> Equalise(yance, greg))\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Farming(x) -> Appraising(x))\nforall x (Snore(x, yance) and Raffle(yance, greg) -> Raffle(x, peyton))\nforall x (Apothecial(x) -> Raffle(x, peyton))\n\nAppraising(greg)\n\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Farming(x) -> Appraising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The mirelle hiccough the austina. The austina slop the mirelle. The carmine admit the mirelle. If the austina is sceptered and the austina admit the carmine then the austina is outback. If someone admit the carmine and the carmine admit the mirelle then the carmine is outback. If someone is pungent then they chase the mirelle. If someone hiccough the austina then they visit the carmine. If someone slop the austina and they chase the carmine then the carmine slop the mirelle. All outback, metabolous people are broken. If someone hiccough the carmine and the carmine admit the mirelle then they visit the austina. If someone is outback then they visit the austina. The carmine does not visit the carmine.", "logic": "\nHiccough(mirelle, austina)\nSlop(austina, mirelle)\nAdmit(carmine, mirelle)\nSceptered(austina) and Admit(austina, carmine) -> Outback(austina)\nforall x (Admit(x, carmine) and Admit(carmine, mirelle) -> Outback(carmine))\nforall x (Pungent(x) -> Slop(x, mirelle))\nforall x (Hiccough(x, austina) -> Admit(x, carmine))\nforall x (Slop(x, austina) and Slop(x, carmine) -> Slop(carmine, mirelle))\nforall x (Outback(x) and Metabolous(x) -> Broken(x))\nforall x (Hiccough(x, carmine) and Admit(carmine, mirelle) -> Admit(x, austina))\nforall x (Outback(x) -> Admit(x, austina))\n\nnot Admit(carmine, carmine)\n\nforall x (Hiccough(x, austina) -> Admit(x, carmine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The lina misquote the tilly. The tilly gimp the lina. The lianna gouge the lina. If the tilly is sectional and the tilly gouge the lianna then the tilly is logy. If someone gouge the lianna and the lianna gouge the lina then the lianna is logy. If someone is amino then they chase the lina. If someone misquote the tilly then they visit the lianna. If someone gimp the tilly and they chase the lianna then the lianna gimp the lina. All logy, handless people are tobagonian. If someone misquote the lianna and the lianna gouge the lina then they visit the tilly. If someone is logy then they visit the tilly. The tilly is tobagonian.", "logic": "\nMisquote(lina, tilly)\nGimp(tilly, lina)\nGouge(lianna, lina)\nSectional(tilly) and Gouge(tilly, lianna) -> Logy(tilly)\nforall x (Gouge(x, lianna) and Gouge(lianna, lina) -> Logy(lianna))\nforall x (Amino(x) -> Gimp(x, lina))\nforall x (Misquote(x, tilly) -> Gouge(x, lianna))\nforall x (Gimp(x, tilly) and Gimp(x, lianna) -> Gimp(lianna, lina))\nforall x (Logy(x) and Handless(x) -> Tobagonian(x))\nforall x (Misquote(x, lianna) and Gouge(lianna, lina) -> Gouge(x, tilly))\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Gouge(x, tilly))\n\nTobagonian(tilly)\n\nforall x (Logy(x) and Handless(x) -> Tobagonian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The lyndy unbuckle the kimmy. The kimmy anoint the lyndy. The goldi unite the lyndy. If the kimmy is tongueless and the kimmy unite the goldi then the kimmy is synclinal. If someone unite the goldi and the goldi unite the lyndy then the goldi is synclinal. If someone is finer then they chase the lyndy. If someone unbuckle the kimmy then they visit the goldi. If someone anoint the kimmy and they chase the goldi then the goldi anoint the lyndy. All synclinal, downright people are aroused. If someone unbuckle the goldi and the goldi unite the lyndy then they visit the kimmy. If someone is synclinal then they visit the kimmy. The goldi does not like the kimmy.", "logic": "\nUnbuckle(lyndy, kimmy)\nAnoint(kimmy, lyndy)\nUnite(goldi, lyndy)\nTongueless(kimmy) and Unite(kimmy, goldi) -> Synclinal(kimmy)\nforall x (Unite(x, goldi) and Unite(goldi, lyndy) -> Synclinal(goldi))\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Anoint(x, lyndy))\nforall x (Unbuckle(x, kimmy) -> Unite(x, goldi))\nforall x (Anoint(x, kimmy) and Anoint(x, goldi) -> Anoint(goldi, lyndy))\nforall x (Synclinal(x) and Downright(x) -> Aroused(x))\nforall x (Unbuckle(x, goldi) and Unite(goldi, lyndy) -> Unite(x, kimmy))\nforall x (Synclinal(x) -> Unite(x, kimmy))\n\nnot Unbuckle(goldi, kimmy)\n\nnot Unbuckle(goldi, kimmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The vito anodize the christean. The christean flop the vito. The jeannine estivate the vito. If the christean is unaired and the christean estivate the jeannine then the christean is dominated. If someone estivate the jeannine and the jeannine estivate the vito then the jeannine is dominated. If someone is tricky then they chase the vito. If someone anodize the christean then they visit the jeannine. If someone flop the christean and they chase the jeannine then the jeannine flop the vito. All dominated, dirigible people are unheaded. If someone anodize the jeannine and the jeannine estivate the vito then they visit the christean. If someone is dominated then they visit the christean. The christean flop the christean.", "logic": "\nAnodize(vito, christean)\nFlop(christean, vito)\nEstivate(jeannine, vito)\nUnaired(christean) and Estivate(christean, jeannine) -> Dominated(christean)\nforall x (Estivate(x, jeannine) and Estivate(jeannine, vito) -> Dominated(jeannine))\nforall x (Tricky(x) -> Flop(x, vito))\nforall x (Anodize(x, christean) -> Estivate(x, jeannine))\nforall x (Flop(x, christean) and Flop(x, jeannine) -> Flop(jeannine, vito))\nforall x (Dominated(x) and Dirigible(x) -> Unheaded(x))\nforall x (Anodize(x, jeannine) and Estivate(jeannine, vito) -> Estivate(x, christean))\nforall x (Dominated(x) -> Estivate(x, christean))\n\nFlop(christean, christean)\n\nFlop(christean, christean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The bethina outshine the renae. The renae enable the bethina. The orelia husk the bethina. If the renae is pupillary and the renae husk the orelia then the renae is aneurysmal. If someone husk the orelia and the orelia husk the bethina then the orelia is aneurysmal. If someone is corrugated then they chase the bethina. If someone outshine the renae then they visit the orelia. If someone enable the renae and they chase the orelia then the orelia enable the bethina. All aneurysmal, russian people are apneic. If someone outshine the orelia and the orelia husk the bethina then they visit the renae. If someone is aneurysmal then they visit the renae. The orelia is not russian.", "logic": "\nOutshine(bethina, renae)\nEnable(renae, bethina)\nHusk(orelia, bethina)\nPupillary(renae) and Husk(renae, orelia) -> Aneurysmal(renae)\nforall x (Husk(x, orelia) and Husk(orelia, bethina) -> Aneurysmal(orelia))\nforall x (Corrugated(x) -> Enable(x, bethina))\nforall x (Outshine(x, renae) -> Husk(x, orelia))\nforall x (Enable(x, renae) and Enable(x, orelia) -> Enable(orelia, bethina))\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) and Russian(x) -> Apneic(x))\nforall x (Outshine(x, orelia) and Husk(orelia, bethina) -> Husk(x, renae))\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Husk(x, renae))\n\nnot Russian(orelia)\n\nnot Russian(orelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The eustacia clam the leyla. The leyla mimeograph the eustacia. The storm colligate the eustacia. If the leyla is spikelike and the leyla colligate the storm then the leyla is solitary. If someone colligate the storm and the storm colligate the eustacia then the storm is solitary. If someone is leftover then they chase the eustacia. If someone clam the leyla then they visit the storm. If someone mimeograph the leyla and they chase the storm then the storm mimeograph the eustacia. All solitary, flippant people are opalescent. If someone clam the storm and the storm colligate the eustacia then they visit the leyla. If someone is solitary then they visit the leyla. The leyla is spikelike.", "logic": "\nClam(eustacia, leyla)\nMimeograph(leyla, eustacia)\nColligate(storm, eustacia)\nSpikelike(leyla) and Colligate(leyla, storm) -> Solitary(leyla)\nforall x (Colligate(x, storm) and Colligate(storm, eustacia) -> Solitary(storm))\nforall x (Leftover(x) -> Mimeograph(x, eustacia))\nforall x (Clam(x, leyla) -> Colligate(x, storm))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, leyla) and Mimeograph(x, storm) -> Mimeograph(storm, eustacia))\nforall x (Solitary(x) and Flippant(x) -> Opalescent(x))\nforall x (Clam(x, storm) and Colligate(storm, eustacia) -> Colligate(x, leyla))\nforall x (Solitary(x) -> Colligate(x, leyla))\n\nSpikelike(leyla)\n\nSpikelike(leyla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1163"} {"premises": "The thurstan is potty. The thurstan enthuse the kaitlyn. The thurstan convoy the kaitlyn. The kaitlyn redress the thurstan. The kaitlyn is lunar. The kaitlyn enthuse the thurstan. The kaitlyn convoy the thurstan. If something enthuse the thurstan and the thurstan enthuse the kaitlyn then the thurstan convoy the kaitlyn. If something enthuse the thurstan then the thurstan redress the kaitlyn. If the thurstan redress the kaitlyn then the thurstan is unreduced. If the thurstan redress the kaitlyn and the thurstan enthuse the kaitlyn then the kaitlyn enthuse the thurstan. If something convoy the thurstan and it redress the kaitlyn then it redress the thurstan. If something is unreduced and it redress the kaitlyn then the kaitlyn is unreduced. The thurstan is potty.", "logic": "\nPotty(thurstan)\nEnthuse(thurstan, kaitlyn)\nConvoy(thurstan, kaitlyn)\nRedress(kaitlyn, thurstan)\nLunar(kaitlyn)\nEnthuse(kaitlyn, thurstan)\nConvoy(kaitlyn, thurstan)\nforall x (Enthuse(x, thurstan) and Enthuse(thurstan, kaitlyn) -> Convoy(thurstan, kaitlyn))\nforall x (Enthuse(x, thurstan) -> Redress(thurstan, kaitlyn))\nRedress(thurstan, kaitlyn) -> Unreduced(thurstan)\nRedress(thurstan, kaitlyn) and Enthuse(thurstan, kaitlyn) -> Enthuse(kaitlyn, thurstan)\nforall x (Convoy(x, thurstan) and Redress(x, kaitlyn) -> Redress(x, thurstan))\nforall x (Unreduced(x) and Redress(x, kaitlyn) -> Unreduced(kaitlyn))\n\nPotty(thurstan)\n\ntherefore Potty(thurstan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The aurelia is skanky. The aurelia dunk the walther. The aurelia card the walther. The walther unsheathe the aurelia. The walther is renewable. The walther dunk the aurelia. The walther card the aurelia. If something dunk the aurelia and the aurelia dunk the walther then the aurelia card the walther. If something dunk the aurelia then the aurelia unsheathe the walther. If the aurelia unsheathe the walther then the aurelia is shipboard. If the aurelia unsheathe the walther and the aurelia dunk the walther then the walther dunk the aurelia. If something card the aurelia and it unsheathe the walther then it unsheathe the aurelia. If something is shipboard and it unsheathe the walther then the walther is shipboard. The walther does not visit the aurelia.", "logic": "\nSkanky(aurelia)\nDunk(aurelia, walther)\nCard(aurelia, walther)\nUnsheathe(walther, aurelia)\nRenewable(walther)\nDunk(walther, aurelia)\nCard(walther, aurelia)\nforall x (Dunk(x, aurelia) and Dunk(aurelia, walther) -> Card(aurelia, walther))\nforall x (Dunk(x, aurelia) -> Unsheathe(aurelia, walther))\nUnsheathe(aurelia, walther) -> Shipboard(aurelia)\nUnsheathe(aurelia, walther) and Dunk(aurelia, walther) -> Dunk(walther, aurelia)\nforall x (Card(x, aurelia) and Unsheathe(x, walther) -> Unsheathe(x, aurelia))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) and Unsheathe(x, walther) -> Shipboard(walther))\n\nnot Card(walther, aurelia)\n\ntherefore Card(walther, aurelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The munroe is incorrect. The munroe obsolesce the atlanta. The munroe approbate the atlanta. The atlanta flop the munroe. The atlanta is pale. The atlanta obsolesce the munroe. The atlanta approbate the munroe. If something obsolesce the munroe and the munroe obsolesce the atlanta then the munroe approbate the atlanta. If something obsolesce the munroe then the munroe flop the atlanta. If the munroe flop the atlanta then the munroe is seared. If the munroe flop the atlanta and the munroe obsolesce the atlanta then the atlanta obsolesce the munroe. If something approbate the munroe and it flop the atlanta then it flop the munroe. If something is seared and it flop the atlanta then the atlanta is seared. The munroe flop the atlanta.", "logic": "\nIncorrect(munroe)\nObsolesce(munroe, atlanta)\nApprobate(munroe, atlanta)\nFlop(atlanta, munroe)\nPale(atlanta)\nObsolesce(atlanta, munroe)\nApprobate(atlanta, munroe)\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, munroe) and Obsolesce(munroe, atlanta) -> Approbate(munroe, atlanta))\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, munroe) -> Flop(munroe, atlanta))\nFlop(munroe, atlanta) -> Seared(munroe)\nFlop(munroe, atlanta) and Obsolesce(munroe, atlanta) -> Obsolesce(atlanta, munroe)\nforall x (Approbate(x, munroe) and Flop(x, atlanta) -> Flop(x, munroe))\nforall x (Seared(x) and Flop(x, atlanta) -> Seared(atlanta))\n\nFlop(munroe, atlanta)\n\nObsolesce(atlanta, munroe) and forall x (Obsolesce(x, munroe) -> Flop(munroe, atlanta)) -> therefore Flop(munroe, atlanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The lilla is apsidal. The lilla scrutinize the brina. The lilla mine the brina. The brina farrow the lilla. The brina is alkalic. The brina scrutinize the lilla. The brina mine the lilla. If something scrutinize the lilla and the lilla scrutinize the brina then the lilla mine the brina. If something scrutinize the lilla then the lilla farrow the brina. If the lilla farrow the brina then the lilla is blotchy. If the lilla farrow the brina and the lilla scrutinize the brina then the brina scrutinize the lilla. If something mine the lilla and it farrow the brina then it farrow the lilla. If something is blotchy and it farrow the brina then the brina is blotchy. The lilla does not eat the brina.", "logic": "\nApsidal(lilla)\nScrutinize(lilla, brina)\nMine(lilla, brina)\nFarrow(brina, lilla)\nAlkalic(brina)\nScrutinize(brina, lilla)\nMine(brina, lilla)\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, lilla) and Scrutinize(lilla, brina) -> Mine(lilla, brina))\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, lilla) -> Farrow(lilla, brina))\nFarrow(lilla, brina) -> Blotchy(lilla)\nFarrow(lilla, brina) and Scrutinize(lilla, brina) -> Scrutinize(brina, lilla)\nforall x (Mine(x, lilla) and Farrow(x, brina) -> Farrow(x, lilla))\nforall x (Blotchy(x) and Farrow(x, brina) -> Blotchy(brina))\n\nnot Farrow(lilla, brina)\n\nScrutinize(brina, lilla) and forall x (Scrutinize(x, lilla) -> Farrow(lilla, brina)) -> therefore Farrow(lilla, brina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The dulcy is cherubic. The dulcy impoverish the sisile. The dulcy moderate the sisile. The sisile prettify the dulcy. The sisile is micaceous. The sisile impoverish the dulcy. The sisile moderate the dulcy. If something impoverish the dulcy and the dulcy impoverish the sisile then the dulcy moderate the sisile. If something impoverish the dulcy then the dulcy prettify the sisile. If the dulcy prettify the sisile then the dulcy is calycled. If the dulcy prettify the sisile and the dulcy impoverish the sisile then the sisile impoverish the dulcy. If something moderate the dulcy and it prettify the sisile then it prettify the dulcy. If something is calycled and it prettify the sisile then the sisile is calycled. The dulcy is calycled.", "logic": "\nCherubic(dulcy)\nImpoverish(dulcy, sisile)\nModerate(dulcy, sisile)\nPrettify(sisile, dulcy)\nMicaceous(sisile)\nImpoverish(sisile, dulcy)\nModerate(sisile, dulcy)\nforall x (Impoverish(x, dulcy) and Impoverish(dulcy, sisile) -> Moderate(dulcy, sisile))\nforall x (Impoverish(x, dulcy) -> Prettify(dulcy, sisile))\nPrettify(dulcy, sisile) -> Calycled(dulcy)\nPrettify(dulcy, sisile) and Impoverish(dulcy, sisile) -> Impoverish(sisile, dulcy)\nforall x (Moderate(x, dulcy) and Prettify(x, sisile) -> Prettify(x, dulcy))\nforall x (Calycled(x) and Prettify(x, sisile) -> Calycled(sisile))\n\nCalycled(dulcy)\n\nImpoverish(sisile, dulcy) and forall x (Impoverish(x, dulcy) -> Prettify(dulcy, sisile)) -> therefore Prettify(dulcy, sisile) Prettify(dulcy, sisile) and Prettify(dulcy, sisile) -> Calycled(dulcy) -> therefore Calycled(dulcy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The voltaire is initiatory. The voltaire dissatisfy the gifford. The voltaire fodder the gifford. The gifford strand the voltaire. The gifford is scented. The gifford dissatisfy the voltaire. The gifford fodder the voltaire. If something dissatisfy the voltaire and the voltaire dissatisfy the gifford then the voltaire fodder the gifford. If something dissatisfy the voltaire then the voltaire strand the gifford. If the voltaire strand the gifford then the voltaire is praiseful. If the voltaire strand the gifford and the voltaire dissatisfy the gifford then the gifford dissatisfy the voltaire. If something fodder the voltaire and it strand the gifford then it strand the voltaire. If something is praiseful and it strand the gifford then the gifford is praiseful. The voltaire is not praiseful.", "logic": "\nInitiatory(voltaire)\nDissatisfy(voltaire, gifford)\nFodder(voltaire, gifford)\nStrand(gifford, voltaire)\nScented(gifford)\nDissatisfy(gifford, voltaire)\nFodder(gifford, voltaire)\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, voltaire) and Dissatisfy(voltaire, gifford) -> Fodder(voltaire, gifford))\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, voltaire) -> Strand(voltaire, gifford))\nStrand(voltaire, gifford) -> Praiseful(voltaire)\nStrand(voltaire, gifford) and Dissatisfy(voltaire, gifford) -> Dissatisfy(gifford, voltaire)\nforall x (Fodder(x, voltaire) and Strand(x, gifford) -> Strand(x, voltaire))\nforall x (Praiseful(x) and Strand(x, gifford) -> Praiseful(gifford))\n\nnot Praiseful(voltaire)\n\nDissatisfy(gifford, voltaire) and forall x (Dissatisfy(x, voltaire) -> Strand(voltaire, gifford)) -> therefore Strand(voltaire, gifford) Strand(voltaire, gifford) and Strand(voltaire, gifford) -> Praiseful(voltaire) -> therefore Praiseful(voltaire)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The ninon is capricious. The ninon sleek the gerrit. The ninon fawn the gerrit. The gerrit whiz the ninon. The gerrit is invincible. The gerrit sleek the ninon. The gerrit fawn the ninon. If something sleek the ninon and the ninon sleek the gerrit then the ninon fawn the gerrit. If something sleek the ninon then the ninon whiz the gerrit. If the ninon whiz the gerrit then the ninon is boughten. If the ninon whiz the gerrit and the ninon sleek the gerrit then the gerrit sleek the ninon. If something fawn the ninon and it whiz the gerrit then it whiz the ninon. If something is boughten and it whiz the gerrit then the gerrit is boughten. The gerrit is boughten.", "logic": "\nCapricious(ninon)\nSleek(ninon, gerrit)\nFawn(ninon, gerrit)\nWhiz(gerrit, ninon)\nInvincible(gerrit)\nSleek(gerrit, ninon)\nFawn(gerrit, ninon)\nforall x (Sleek(x, ninon) and Sleek(ninon, gerrit) -> Fawn(ninon, gerrit))\nforall x (Sleek(x, ninon) -> Whiz(ninon, gerrit))\nWhiz(ninon, gerrit) -> Boughten(ninon)\nWhiz(ninon, gerrit) and Sleek(ninon, gerrit) -> Sleek(gerrit, ninon)\nforall x (Fawn(x, ninon) and Whiz(x, gerrit) -> Whiz(x, ninon))\nforall x (Boughten(x) and Whiz(x, gerrit) -> Boughten(gerrit))\n\nBoughten(gerrit)\n\nSleek(gerrit, ninon) and forall x (Sleek(x, ninon) -> Whiz(ninon, gerrit)) -> therefore Whiz(ninon, gerrit) Whiz(ninon, gerrit) and Whiz(ninon, gerrit) -> Boughten(ninon) -> therefore Boughten(ninon) Sleek(gerrit, ninon) and forall x (Sleek(x, ninon) -> Whiz(ninon, gerrit)) -> therefore Whiz(ninon, gerrit) Boughten(ninon) and Whiz(ninon, gerrit) and forall x (Boughten(x) and Whiz(x, gerrit) -> Boughten(gerrit)) -> therefore Boughten(gerrit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The karin is euphoriant. The karin cavort the rab. The karin turn the rab. The rab filter the karin. The rab is seljuk. The rab cavort the karin. The rab turn the karin. If something cavort the karin and the karin cavort the rab then the karin turn the rab. If something cavort the karin then the karin filter the rab. If the karin filter the rab then the karin is serflike. If the karin filter the rab and the karin cavort the rab then the rab cavort the karin. If something turn the karin and it filter the rab then it filter the karin. If something is serflike and it filter the rab then the rab is serflike. The rab is not serflike.", "logic": "\nEuphoriant(karin)\nCavort(karin, rab)\nTurn(karin, rab)\nFilter(rab, karin)\nSeljuk(rab)\nCavort(rab, karin)\nTurn(rab, karin)\nforall x (Cavort(x, karin) and Cavort(karin, rab) -> Turn(karin, rab))\nforall x (Cavort(x, karin) -> Filter(karin, rab))\nFilter(karin, rab) -> Serflike(karin)\nFilter(karin, rab) and Cavort(karin, rab) -> Cavort(rab, karin)\nforall x (Turn(x, karin) and Filter(x, rab) -> Filter(x, karin))\nforall x (Serflike(x) and Filter(x, rab) -> Serflike(rab))\n\nnot Serflike(rab)\n\nCavort(rab, karin) and forall x (Cavort(x, karin) -> Filter(karin, rab)) -> therefore Filter(karin, rab) Filter(karin, rab) and Filter(karin, rab) -> Serflike(karin) -> therefore Serflike(karin) Cavort(rab, karin) and forall x (Cavort(x, karin) -> Filter(karin, rab)) -> therefore Filter(karin, rab) Serflike(karin) and Filter(karin, rab) and forall x (Serflike(x) and Filter(x, rab) -> Serflike(rab)) -> therefore Serflike(rab)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The dorice is moire. The dorice trance the jud. The dorice carburet the jud. The jud plastinate the dorice. The jud is liberian. The jud trance the dorice. The jud carburet the dorice. If something trance the dorice and the dorice trance the jud then the dorice carburet the jud. If something trance the dorice then the dorice plastinate the jud. If the dorice plastinate the jud then the dorice is fugacious. If the dorice plastinate the jud and the dorice trance the jud then the jud trance the dorice. If something carburet the dorice and it plastinate the jud then it plastinate the dorice. If something is fugacious and it plastinate the jud then the jud is fugacious. The dorice does not eat the dorice.", "logic": "\nMoire(dorice)\nTrance(dorice, jud)\nCarburet(dorice, jud)\nPlastinate(jud, dorice)\nLiberian(jud)\nTrance(jud, dorice)\nCarburet(jud, dorice)\nforall x (Trance(x, dorice) and Trance(dorice, jud) -> Carburet(dorice, jud))\nforall x (Trance(x, dorice) -> Plastinate(dorice, jud))\nPlastinate(dorice, jud) -> Fugacious(dorice)\nPlastinate(dorice, jud) and Trance(dorice, jud) -> Trance(jud, dorice)\nforall x (Carburet(x, dorice) and Plastinate(x, jud) -> Plastinate(x, dorice))\nforall x (Fugacious(x) and Plastinate(x, jud) -> Fugacious(jud))\n\nnot Plastinate(dorice, dorice)\n\nforall x (Carburet(x, dorice) and Plastinate(x, jud) -> Plastinate(x, dorice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The knox is tranquil. The knox segue the lynnelle. The knox jaunt the lynnelle. The lynnelle woosh the knox. The lynnelle is heavenward. The lynnelle segue the knox. The lynnelle jaunt the knox. If something segue the knox and the knox segue the lynnelle then the knox jaunt the lynnelle. If something segue the knox then the knox woosh the lynnelle. If the knox woosh the lynnelle then the knox is exhaustive. If the knox woosh the lynnelle and the knox segue the lynnelle then the lynnelle segue the knox. If something jaunt the knox and it woosh the lynnelle then it woosh the knox. If something is exhaustive and it woosh the lynnelle then the lynnelle is exhaustive. The knox is big.", "logic": "\nTranquil(knox)\nSegue(knox, lynnelle)\nJaunt(knox, lynnelle)\nWoosh(lynnelle, knox)\nHeavenward(lynnelle)\nSegue(lynnelle, knox)\nJaunt(lynnelle, knox)\nforall x (Segue(x, knox) and Segue(knox, lynnelle) -> Jaunt(knox, lynnelle))\nforall x (Segue(x, knox) -> Woosh(knox, lynnelle))\nWoosh(knox, lynnelle) -> Exhaustive(knox)\nWoosh(knox, lynnelle) and Segue(knox, lynnelle) -> Segue(lynnelle, knox)\nforall x (Jaunt(x, knox) and Woosh(x, lynnelle) -> Woosh(x, knox))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) and Woosh(x, lynnelle) -> Exhaustive(lynnelle))\n\nBig(knox)\n\nBig(knox) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The nico is rococo. The nico sudate the irita. The nico delouse the irita. The irita mention the nico. The irita is addlepated. The irita sudate the nico. The irita delouse the nico. If something sudate the nico and the nico sudate the irita then the nico delouse the irita. If something sudate the nico then the nico mention the irita. If the nico mention the irita then the nico is lank. If the nico mention the irita and the nico sudate the irita then the irita sudate the nico. If something delouse the nico and it mention the irita then it mention the nico. If something is lank and it mention the irita then the irita is lank. The nico does not visit the nico.", "logic": "\nRococo(nico)\nSudate(nico, irita)\nDelouse(nico, irita)\nMention(irita, nico)\nAddlepated(irita)\nSudate(irita, nico)\nDelouse(irita, nico)\nforall x (Sudate(x, nico) and Sudate(nico, irita) -> Delouse(nico, irita))\nforall x (Sudate(x, nico) -> Mention(nico, irita))\nMention(nico, irita) -> Lank(nico)\nMention(nico, irita) and Sudate(nico, irita) -> Sudate(irita, nico)\nforall x (Delouse(x, nico) and Mention(x, irita) -> Mention(x, nico))\nforall x (Lank(x) and Mention(x, irita) -> Lank(irita))\n\nnot Delouse(nico, nico)\n\nnot Delouse(nico, nico) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The salomo is coaxal. The salomo empathise the ignatius. The salomo misbelieve the ignatius. The ignatius affright the salomo. The ignatius is advised. The ignatius empathise the salomo. The ignatius misbelieve the salomo. If something empathise the salomo and the salomo empathise the ignatius then the salomo misbelieve the ignatius. If something empathise the salomo then the salomo affright the ignatius. If the salomo affright the ignatius then the salomo is blebby. If the salomo affright the ignatius and the salomo empathise the ignatius then the ignatius empathise the salomo. If something misbelieve the salomo and it affright the ignatius then it affright the salomo. If something is blebby and it affright the ignatius then the ignatius is blebby. The ignatius affright the ignatius.", "logic": "\nCoaxal(salomo)\nEmpathise(salomo, ignatius)\nMisbelieve(salomo, ignatius)\nAffright(ignatius, salomo)\nAdvised(ignatius)\nEmpathise(ignatius, salomo)\nMisbelieve(ignatius, salomo)\nforall x (Empathise(x, salomo) and Empathise(salomo, ignatius) -> Misbelieve(salomo, ignatius))\nforall x (Empathise(x, salomo) -> Affright(salomo, ignatius))\nAffright(salomo, ignatius) -> Blebby(salomo)\nAffright(salomo, ignatius) and Empathise(salomo, ignatius) -> Empathise(ignatius, salomo)\nforall x (Misbelieve(x, salomo) and Affright(x, ignatius) -> Affright(x, salomo))\nforall x (Blebby(x) and Affright(x, ignatius) -> Blebby(ignatius))\n\nAffright(ignatius, ignatius)\n\nAffright(ignatius, ignatius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The marian is amoebic. The marian waylay the albrecht. The marian bead the albrecht. The albrecht recall the marian. The albrecht is reckless. The albrecht waylay the marian. The albrecht bead the marian. If something waylay the marian and the marian waylay the albrecht then the marian bead the albrecht. If something waylay the marian then the marian recall the albrecht. If the marian recall the albrecht then the marian is wraithlike. If the marian recall the albrecht and the marian waylay the albrecht then the albrecht waylay the marian. If something bead the marian and it recall the albrecht then it recall the marian. If something is wraithlike and it recall the albrecht then the albrecht is wraithlike. The marian is not reckless.", "logic": "\nAmoebic(marian)\nWaylay(marian, albrecht)\nBead(marian, albrecht)\nRecall(albrecht, marian)\nReckless(albrecht)\nWaylay(albrecht, marian)\nBead(albrecht, marian)\nforall x (Waylay(x, marian) and Waylay(marian, albrecht) -> Bead(marian, albrecht))\nforall x (Waylay(x, marian) -> Recall(marian, albrecht))\nRecall(marian, albrecht) -> Wraithlike(marian)\nRecall(marian, albrecht) and Waylay(marian, albrecht) -> Waylay(albrecht, marian)\nforall x (Bead(x, marian) and Recall(x, albrecht) -> Recall(x, marian))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) and Recall(x, albrecht) -> Wraithlike(albrecht))\n\nnot Reckless(marian)\n\nnot Reckless(marian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The layne is expanded. The layne narrate the berke. The layne coconspire the berke. The berke crisscross the layne. The berke is dastard. The berke narrate the layne. The berke coconspire the layne. If something narrate the layne and the layne narrate the berke then the layne coconspire the berke. If something narrate the layne then the layne crisscross the berke. If the layne crisscross the berke then the layne is ataxic. If the layne crisscross the berke and the layne narrate the berke then the berke narrate the layne. If something coconspire the layne and it crisscross the berke then it crisscross the layne. If something is ataxic and it crisscross the berke then the berke is ataxic. The berke coconspire the berke.", "logic": "\nExpanded(layne)\nNarrate(layne, berke)\nCoconspire(layne, berke)\nCrisscross(berke, layne)\nDastard(berke)\nNarrate(berke, layne)\nCoconspire(berke, layne)\nforall x (Narrate(x, layne) and Narrate(layne, berke) -> Coconspire(layne, berke))\nforall x (Narrate(x, layne) -> Crisscross(layne, berke))\nCrisscross(layne, berke) -> Ataxic(layne)\nCrisscross(layne, berke) and Narrate(layne, berke) -> Narrate(berke, layne)\nforall x (Coconspire(x, layne) and Crisscross(x, berke) -> Crisscross(x, layne))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) and Crisscross(x, berke) -> Ataxic(berke))\n\nCoconspire(berke, berke)\n\nCoconspire(berke, berke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The clay is flameproof. The clay boot the alisa. The clay bechance the alisa. The alisa deplete the clay. The alisa is digital. The alisa boot the clay. The alisa bechance the clay. If something boot the clay and the clay boot the alisa then the clay bechance the alisa. If something boot the clay then the clay deplete the alisa. If the clay deplete the alisa then the clay is swedish. If the clay deplete the alisa and the clay boot the alisa then the alisa boot the clay. If something bechance the clay and it deplete the alisa then it deplete the clay. If something is swedish and it deplete the alisa then the alisa is swedish. The clay does not see the clay.", "logic": "\nFlameproof(clay)\nBoot(clay, alisa)\nBechance(clay, alisa)\nDeplete(alisa, clay)\nDigital(alisa)\nBoot(alisa, clay)\nBechance(alisa, clay)\nforall x (Boot(x, clay) and Boot(clay, alisa) -> Bechance(clay, alisa))\nforall x (Boot(x, clay) -> Deplete(clay, alisa))\nDeplete(clay, alisa) -> Swedish(clay)\nDeplete(clay, alisa) and Boot(clay, alisa) -> Boot(alisa, clay)\nforall x (Bechance(x, clay) and Deplete(x, alisa) -> Deplete(x, clay))\nforall x (Swedish(x) and Deplete(x, alisa) -> Swedish(alisa))\n\nnot Boot(clay, clay)\n\nnot Boot(clay, clay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "The carolynn is spousal. The carolynn disappear the bobine. The carolynn scoff the bobine. The bobine demote the carolynn. The bobine is unclear. The bobine disappear the carolynn. The bobine scoff the carolynn. If something disappear the carolynn and the carolynn disappear the bobine then the carolynn scoff the bobine. If something disappear the carolynn then the carolynn demote the bobine. If the carolynn demote the bobine then the carolynn is apothecial. If the carolynn demote the bobine and the carolynn disappear the bobine then the bobine disappear the carolynn. If something scoff the carolynn and it demote the bobine then it demote the carolynn. If something is apothecial and it demote the bobine then the bobine is apothecial. The carolynn is green.", "logic": "\nSpousal(carolynn)\nDisappear(carolynn, bobine)\nScoff(carolynn, bobine)\nDemote(bobine, carolynn)\nUnclear(bobine)\nDisappear(bobine, carolynn)\nScoff(bobine, carolynn)\nforall x (Disappear(x, carolynn) and Disappear(carolynn, bobine) -> Scoff(carolynn, bobine))\nforall x (Disappear(x, carolynn) -> Demote(carolynn, bobine))\nDemote(carolynn, bobine) -> Apothecial(carolynn)\nDemote(carolynn, bobine) and Disappear(carolynn, bobine) -> Disappear(bobine, carolynn)\nforall x (Scoff(x, carolynn) and Demote(x, bobine) -> Demote(x, carolynn))\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Demote(x, bobine) -> Apothecial(bobine))\n\nGreen(carolynn)\n\nGreen(carolynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-187"} {"premises": "Lucie is hyperbolic. Lucie is xxxviii. Lucie is subatomic. If Lucie is irrational then Lucie is hyperbolic. If someone is hyperbolic then they are stuffy. All symbolical, prima people are irrational. If Lucie is hyperbolic then Lucie is symbolical. All xxxviii people are stuffy. All prima people are symbolical. Smart people are hyperbolic. If Lucie is stuffy and Lucie is symbolical then Lucie is prima. Lucie is xxxviii.", "logic": "\nHyperbolic(lucie)\nXxxviii(lucie)\nSubatomic(lucie)\nIrrational(lucie) -> Hyperbolic(lucie)\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Symbolical(x) and Prima(x) -> Irrational(x))\nHyperbolic(lucie) -> Symbolical(lucie)\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) -> Stuffy(x))\nforall x (Prima(x) -> Symbolical(x))\nforall x (Irrational(x) -> Hyperbolic(x))\nStuffy(lucie) and Symbolical(lucie) -> Prima(lucie)\n\nXxxviii(lucie)\n\ntherefore Xxxviii(lucie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Hestia is paranasal. Hestia is youthful. Hestia is unlined. If Hestia is lengthy then Hestia is paranasal. If someone is paranasal then they are petaloid. All fallacious, depicted people are lengthy. If Hestia is paranasal then Hestia is fallacious. All youthful people are petaloid. All depicted people are fallacious. Smart people are paranasal. If Hestia is petaloid and Hestia is fallacious then Hestia is depicted. Hestia is not youthful.", "logic": "\nParanasal(hestia)\nYouthful(hestia)\nUnlined(hestia)\nLengthy(hestia) -> Paranasal(hestia)\nforall x (Paranasal(x) -> Petaloid(x))\nforall x (Fallacious(x) and Depicted(x) -> Lengthy(x))\nParanasal(hestia) -> Fallacious(hestia)\nforall x (Youthful(x) -> Petaloid(x))\nforall x (Depicted(x) -> Fallacious(x))\nforall x (Lengthy(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nPetaloid(hestia) and Fallacious(hestia) -> Depicted(hestia)\n\nnot Youthful(hestia)\n\ntherefore Youthful(hestia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Almeda is brazen. Almeda is pliant. Almeda is smaller. If Almeda is sporting then Almeda is brazen. If someone is brazen then they are dutiable. All repulsive, timeless people are sporting. If Almeda is brazen then Almeda is repulsive. All pliant people are dutiable. All timeless people are repulsive. Smart people are brazen. If Almeda is dutiable and Almeda is repulsive then Almeda is timeless. Almeda is repulsive.", "logic": "\nBrazen(almeda)\nPliant(almeda)\nSmaller(almeda)\nSporting(almeda) -> Brazen(almeda)\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Dutiable(x))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) and Timeless(x) -> Sporting(x))\nBrazen(almeda) -> Repulsive(almeda)\nforall x (Pliant(x) -> Dutiable(x))\nforall x (Timeless(x) -> Repulsive(x))\nforall x (Sporting(x) -> Brazen(x))\nDutiable(almeda) and Repulsive(almeda) -> Timeless(almeda)\n\nRepulsive(almeda)\n\nBrazen(almeda) and Brazen(almeda) -> Repulsive(almeda) -> therefore Repulsive(almeda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Dacy is nepali. Dacy is frangible. Dacy is kittenish. If Dacy is gangrenous then Dacy is nepali. If someone is nepali then they are angelical. All amendable, freeborn people are gangrenous. If Dacy is nepali then Dacy is amendable. All frangible people are angelical. All freeborn people are amendable. Smart people are nepali. If Dacy is angelical and Dacy is amendable then Dacy is freeborn. Dacy is not amendable.", "logic": "\nNepali(dacy)\nFrangible(dacy)\nKittenish(dacy)\nGangrenous(dacy) -> Nepali(dacy)\nforall x (Nepali(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Amendable(x) and Freeborn(x) -> Gangrenous(x))\nNepali(dacy) -> Amendable(dacy)\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Freeborn(x) -> Amendable(x))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) -> Nepali(x))\nAngelical(dacy) and Amendable(dacy) -> Freeborn(dacy)\n\nnot Amendable(dacy)\n\nNepali(dacy) and Nepali(dacy) -> Amendable(dacy) -> therefore Amendable(dacy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Maure is scaly. Maure is pronounced. Maure is fanciful. If Maure is sisterlike then Maure is scaly. If someone is scaly then they are unvendible. All drinkable, alarmed people are sisterlike. If Maure is scaly then Maure is drinkable. All pronounced people are unvendible. All alarmed people are drinkable. Smart people are scaly. If Maure is unvendible and Maure is drinkable then Maure is alarmed. Maure is alarmed.", "logic": "\nScaly(maure)\nPronounced(maure)\nFanciful(maure)\nSisterlike(maure) -> Scaly(maure)\nforall x (Scaly(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and Alarmed(x) -> Sisterlike(x))\nScaly(maure) -> Drinkable(maure)\nforall x (Pronounced(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Alarmed(x) -> Drinkable(x))\nforall x (Sisterlike(x) -> Scaly(x))\nUnvendible(maure) and Drinkable(maure) -> Alarmed(maure)\n\nAlarmed(maure)\n\nScaly(maure) and forall x (Scaly(x) -> Unvendible(x)) -> therefore Unvendible(maure) Scaly(maure) and Scaly(maure) -> Drinkable(maure) -> therefore Drinkable(maure) Unvendible(maure) and Drinkable(maure) and Unvendible(maure) and Drinkable(maure) -> Alarmed(maure) -> therefore Alarmed(maure)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Gustaf is organic. Gustaf is durable. Gustaf is colored. If Gustaf is derogatory then Gustaf is organic. If someone is organic then they are estival. All buttery, forced people are derogatory. If Gustaf is organic then Gustaf is buttery. All durable people are estival. All forced people are buttery. Smart people are organic. If Gustaf is estival and Gustaf is buttery then Gustaf is forced. Gustaf is not forced.", "logic": "\nOrganic(gustaf)\nDurable(gustaf)\nColored(gustaf)\nDerogatory(gustaf) -> Organic(gustaf)\nforall x (Organic(x) -> Estival(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) and Forced(x) -> Derogatory(x))\nOrganic(gustaf) -> Buttery(gustaf)\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Estival(x))\nforall x (Forced(x) -> Buttery(x))\nforall x (Derogatory(x) -> Organic(x))\nEstival(gustaf) and Buttery(gustaf) -> Forced(gustaf)\n\nnot Forced(gustaf)\n\nOrganic(gustaf) and forall x (Organic(x) -> Estival(x)) -> therefore Estival(gustaf) Organic(gustaf) and Organic(gustaf) -> Buttery(gustaf) -> therefore Buttery(gustaf) Estival(gustaf) and Buttery(gustaf) and Estival(gustaf) and Buttery(gustaf) -> Forced(gustaf) -> therefore Forced(gustaf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Darian is vulcanised. Darian is basal. Darian is waspish. If Darian is autogamous then Darian is vulcanised. If someone is vulcanised then they are communist. All isolable, astatic people are autogamous. If Darian is vulcanised then Darian is isolable. All basal people are communist. All astatic people are isolable. Smart people are vulcanised. If Darian is communist and Darian is isolable then Darian is astatic. Darian is autogamous.", "logic": "\nVulcanised(darian)\nBasal(darian)\nWaspish(darian)\nAutogamous(darian) -> Vulcanised(darian)\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Communist(x))\nforall x (Isolable(x) and Astatic(x) -> Autogamous(x))\nVulcanised(darian) -> Isolable(darian)\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Communist(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) -> Isolable(x))\nforall x (Autogamous(x) -> Vulcanised(x))\nCommunist(darian) and Isolable(darian) -> Astatic(darian)\n\nAutogamous(darian)\n\nVulcanised(darian) and Vulcanised(darian) -> Isolable(darian) -> therefore Isolable(darian) Vulcanised(darian) and forall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Communist(x)) -> therefore Communist(darian) Vulcanised(darian) and Vulcanised(darian) -> Isolable(darian) -> therefore Isolable(darian) Communist(darian) and Isolable(darian) and Communist(darian) and Isolable(darian) -> Astatic(darian) -> therefore Astatic(darian) Isolable(darian) and Astatic(darian) and forall x (Isolable(x) and Astatic(x) -> Autogamous(x)) -> therefore Autogamous(darian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Ninnette is annalistic. Ninnette is roughshod. Ninnette is violet. If Ninnette is pure then Ninnette is annalistic. If someone is annalistic then they are unitarian. All trite, aetiologic people are pure. If Ninnette is annalistic then Ninnette is trite. All roughshod people are unitarian. All aetiologic people are trite. Smart people are annalistic. If Ninnette is unitarian and Ninnette is trite then Ninnette is aetiologic. Ninnette is not pure.", "logic": "\nAnnalistic(ninnette)\nRoughshod(ninnette)\nViolet(ninnette)\nPure(ninnette) -> Annalistic(ninnette)\nforall x (Annalistic(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Trite(x) and Aetiologic(x) -> Pure(x))\nAnnalistic(ninnette) -> Trite(ninnette)\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Unitarian(x))\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Trite(x))\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Annalistic(x))\nUnitarian(ninnette) and Trite(ninnette) -> Aetiologic(ninnette)\n\nnot Pure(ninnette)\n\nAnnalistic(ninnette) and Annalistic(ninnette) -> Trite(ninnette) -> therefore Trite(ninnette) Annalistic(ninnette) and forall x (Annalistic(x) -> Unitarian(x)) -> therefore Unitarian(ninnette) Annalistic(ninnette) and Annalistic(ninnette) -> Trite(ninnette) -> therefore Trite(ninnette) Unitarian(ninnette) and Trite(ninnette) and Unitarian(ninnette) and Trite(ninnette) -> Aetiologic(ninnette) -> therefore Aetiologic(ninnette) Trite(ninnette) and Aetiologic(ninnette) and forall x (Trite(x) and Aetiologic(x) -> Pure(x)) -> therefore Pure(ninnette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-420"} {"premises": "Edyth is perfervid. Javier is marred. Ailyn is needy. Judas is jellylike. If something is jellylike then it is validating. All validating things are perfervid. If something is needy then it is jellylike. Judas is jellylike.", "logic": "\nPerfervid(edyth)\nMarred(javier)\nNeedy(ailyn)\nJellylike(judas)\nforall x (Jellylike(x) -> Validating(x))\nforall x (Validating(x) -> Perfervid(x))\nforall x (Needy(x) -> Jellylike(x))\n\nJellylike(judas)\n\ntherefore Jellylike(judas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Seka is warm. Christin is tsaristic. Pauly is alterable. Hassan is pulverised. If something is pulverised then it is lusterless. All lusterless things are warm. If something is alterable then it is pulverised. Seka is not warm.", "logic": "\nWarm(seka)\nTsaristic(christin)\nAlterable(pauly)\nPulverised(hassan)\nforall x (Pulverised(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Warm(x))\nforall x (Alterable(x) -> Pulverised(x))\n\nnot Warm(seka)\n\ntherefore Warm(seka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Ame is miraculous. Otha is timeless. Noble is vernacular. Christi is thirty. If something is thirty then it is unroofed. All unroofed things are miraculous. If something is vernacular then it is thirty. Noble is thirty.", "logic": "\nMiraculous(ame)\nTimeless(otha)\nVernacular(noble)\nThirty(christi)\nforall x (Thirty(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Miraculous(x))\nforall x (Vernacular(x) -> Thirty(x))\n\nThirty(noble)\n\nVernacular(noble) and forall x (Vernacular(x) -> Thirty(x)) -> therefore Thirty(noble)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Douglass is triploid. Joni is unsocial. Jerome is youthful. Ritchie is behind. If something is behind then it is stifled. All stifled things are triploid. If something is youthful then it is behind. Ritchie is not stifled.", "logic": "\nTriploid(douglass)\nUnsocial(joni)\nYouthful(jerome)\nBehind(ritchie)\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Stifled(x) -> Triploid(x))\nforall x (Youthful(x) -> Behind(x))\n\nnot Stifled(ritchie)\n\nBehind(ritchie) and forall x (Behind(x) -> Stifled(x)) -> therefore Stifled(ritchie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Greg is bulbaceous. Ingemar is capsular. Babette is ineffable. Billie is sheltered. If something is sheltered then it is liberated. All liberated things are bulbaceous. If something is ineffable then it is sheltered. Billie is bulbaceous.", "logic": "\nBulbaceous(greg)\nCapsular(ingemar)\nIneffable(babette)\nSheltered(billie)\nforall x (Sheltered(x) -> Liberated(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) -> Bulbaceous(x))\nforall x (Ineffable(x) -> Sheltered(x))\n\nBulbaceous(billie)\n\nSheltered(billie) and forall x (Sheltered(x) -> Liberated(x)) -> therefore Liberated(billie) Liberated(billie) and forall x (Liberated(x) -> Bulbaceous(x)) -> therefore Bulbaceous(billie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Marcelo is unlamented. Kathlin is ungracious. Brana is pacifistic. Gabbi is unbiased. If something is unbiased then it is disarrayed. All disarrayed things are unlamented. If something is pacifistic then it is unbiased. Gabbi is not unlamented.", "logic": "\nUnlamented(marcelo)\nUngracious(kathlin)\nPacifistic(brana)\nUnbiased(gabbi)\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Disarrayed(x))\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) -> Unlamented(x))\nforall x (Pacifistic(x) -> Unbiased(x))\n\nnot Unlamented(gabbi)\n\nUnbiased(gabbi) and forall x (Unbiased(x) -> Disarrayed(x)) -> therefore Disarrayed(gabbi) Disarrayed(gabbi) and forall x (Disarrayed(x) -> Unlamented(x)) -> therefore Unlamented(gabbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Lanie is emergent. Myranda is acrid. Purcell is tentacled. Hezekiah is involved. If something is involved then it is realistic. All realistic things are emergent. If something is tentacled then it is involved. Purcell is emergent.", "logic": "\nEmergent(lanie)\nAcrid(myranda)\nTentacled(purcell)\nInvolved(hezekiah)\nforall x (Involved(x) -> Realistic(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) -> Emergent(x))\nforall x (Tentacled(x) -> Involved(x))\n\nEmergent(purcell)\n\nTentacled(purcell) and forall x (Tentacled(x) -> Involved(x)) -> therefore Involved(purcell) Involved(purcell) and forall x (Involved(x) -> Realistic(x)) -> therefore Realistic(purcell) Realistic(purcell) and forall x (Realistic(x) -> Emergent(x)) -> therefore Emergent(purcell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Gustie is unsaleable. Brandice is riblike. Fayina is hymenal. Dolley is brindled. If something is brindled then it is wealthy. All wealthy things are unsaleable. If something is hymenal then it is brindled. Fayina is not unsaleable.", "logic": "\nUnsaleable(gustie)\nRiblike(brandice)\nHymenal(fayina)\nBrindled(dolley)\nforall x (Brindled(x) -> Wealthy(x))\nforall x (Wealthy(x) -> Unsaleable(x))\nforall x (Hymenal(x) -> Brindled(x))\n\nnot Unsaleable(fayina)\n\nHymenal(fayina) and forall x (Hymenal(x) -> Brindled(x)) -> therefore Brindled(fayina) Brindled(fayina) and forall x (Brindled(x) -> Wealthy(x)) -> therefore Wealthy(fayina) Wealthy(fayina) and forall x (Wealthy(x) -> Unsaleable(x)) -> therefore Unsaleable(fayina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Elwira is motherless. Winslow is niggardly. Brenna is ruby. Armstrong is tripartite. If something is tripartite then it is sparkly. All sparkly things are motherless. If something is ruby then it is tripartite. Winslow is not sparkly.", "logic": "\nMotherless(elwira)\nNiggardly(winslow)\nRuby(brenna)\nTripartite(armstrong)\nforall x (Tripartite(x) -> Sparkly(x))\nforall x (Sparkly(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Ruby(x) -> Tripartite(x))\n\nnot Sparkly(winslow)\n\nforall x (Tripartite(x) -> Sparkly(x)) <- forall x (Ruby(x) -> Tripartite(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Pepi is aphyllous. Chadd is firm. Vaclav is unstudious. Pierce is mongolian. If something is mongolian then it is discontent. All discontent things are aphyllous. If something is unstudious then it is mongolian. Pepi is discontent.", "logic": "\nAphyllous(pepi)\nFirm(chadd)\nUnstudious(vaclav)\nMongolian(pierce)\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Discontent(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Aphyllous(x))\nforall x (Unstudious(x) -> Mongolian(x))\n\nDiscontent(pepi)\n\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Discontent(x)) <- forall x (Unstudious(x) -> Mongolian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Ashely is funded. Kristy is couthy. Sky is preanal. Sparky is pavlovian. If something is pavlovian then it is privileged. All privileged things are funded. If something is preanal then it is pavlovian. Kristy is not pavlovian.", "logic": "\nFunded(ashely)\nCouthy(kristy)\nPreanal(sky)\nPavlovian(sparky)\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) -> Privileged(x))\nforall x (Privileged(x) -> Funded(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\n\nnot Pavlovian(kristy)\n\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Pavlovian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Thibaut is untamed. Darbie is taloned. Clare is cedarn. Augusto is northmost. If something is northmost then it is flaky. All flaky things are untamed. If something is cedarn then it is northmost. Thibaut is northmost.", "logic": "\nUntamed(thibaut)\nTaloned(darbie)\nCedarn(clare)\nNorthmost(augusto)\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Flaky(x))\nforall x (Flaky(x) -> Untamed(x))\nforall x (Cedarn(x) -> Northmost(x))\n\nNorthmost(thibaut)\n\nforall x (Cedarn(x) -> Northmost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Hyacintha is agreeable. Leone is tricky. Tessie is ocellated. Melantha is depicted. If something is depicted then it is faced. All faced things are agreeable. If something is ocellated then it is depicted. Melantha is not tricky.", "logic": "\nAgreeable(hyacintha)\nTricky(leone)\nOcellated(tessie)\nDepicted(melantha)\nforall x (Depicted(x) -> Faced(x))\nforall x (Faced(x) -> Agreeable(x))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> Depicted(x))\n\nnot Tricky(melantha)\n\nnot Tricky(melantha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Manya is clitoric. Charity is akin. Noah is comate. Theodor is lumpen. If something is lumpen then it is extirpable. All extirpable things are clitoric. If something is comate then it is lumpen. Manya is rough.", "logic": "\nClitoric(manya)\nAkin(charity)\nComate(noah)\nLumpen(theodor)\nforall x (Lumpen(x) -> Extirpable(x))\nforall x (Extirpable(x) -> Clitoric(x))\nforall x (Comate(x) -> Lumpen(x))\n\nRough(manya)\n\nRough(manya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Franky is unrewarded. Sissy is lacerated. Ariela is ghostly. Garrett is liverish. If something is liverish then it is epiphytic. All epiphytic things are unrewarded. If something is ghostly then it is liverish. Ariela is not lacerated.", "logic": "\nUnrewarded(franky)\nLacerated(sissy)\nGhostly(ariela)\nLiverish(garrett)\nforall x (Liverish(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) -> Unrewarded(x))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Liverish(x))\n\nnot Lacerated(ariela)\n\nnot Lacerated(ariela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Wylma is unsocial. Gardiner is known. Roxana is blanched. Jenine is methylated. If something is methylated then it is biface. All biface things are unsocial. If something is blanched then it is methylated. Jenine is rough.", "logic": "\nUnsocial(wylma)\nKnown(gardiner)\nBlanched(roxana)\nMethylated(jenine)\nforall x (Methylated(x) -> Biface(x))\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Unsocial(x))\nforall x (Blanched(x) -> Methylated(x))\n\nRough(jenine)\n\nRough(jenine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Dorthea is ebon. Dorthea is cellular. Dorthea is jacksonian. Dorthea is amazed. Dorthea is millennian. Dorthea is baccate. Rorie is cellular. Rorie is millennian. Rorie is baccate. Happy is ebon. Happy is cellular. Happy is jacksonian. Happy is amazed. Happy is ionian. Happy is millennian. Happy is baccate. If someone is cellular and ebon then they are jacksonian. All ionian, millennian people are amazed. All millennian, cellular people are ionian. Dorthea is baccate.", "logic": "\nEbon(dorthea)\nCellular(dorthea)\nJacksonian(dorthea)\nAmazed(dorthea)\nMillennian(dorthea)\nBaccate(dorthea)\nCellular(rorie)\nMillennian(rorie)\nBaccate(rorie)\nEbon(happy)\nCellular(happy)\nJacksonian(happy)\nAmazed(happy)\nIonian(happy)\nMillennian(happy)\nBaccate(happy)\nforall x (Cellular(x) and Ebon(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nforall x (Ionian(x) and Millennian(x) -> Amazed(x))\nforall x (Millennian(x) and Cellular(x) -> Ionian(x))\n\nBaccate(dorthea)\n\ntherefore Baccate(dorthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Cornelle is laced. Cornelle is cretaceous. Cornelle is debasing. Cornelle is biconcave. Cornelle is despised. Cornelle is cuprous. Vernen is cretaceous. Vernen is despised. Vernen is cuprous. Selby is laced. Selby is cretaceous. Selby is debasing. Selby is biconcave. Selby is anonymous. Selby is despised. Selby is cuprous. If someone is cretaceous and laced then they are debasing. All anonymous, despised people are biconcave. All despised, cretaceous people are anonymous. Cornelle is not biconcave.", "logic": "\nLaced(cornelle)\nCretaceous(cornelle)\nDebasing(cornelle)\nBiconcave(cornelle)\nDespised(cornelle)\nCuprous(cornelle)\nCretaceous(vernen)\nDespised(vernen)\nCuprous(vernen)\nLaced(selby)\nCretaceous(selby)\nDebasing(selby)\nBiconcave(selby)\nAnonymous(selby)\nDespised(selby)\nCuprous(selby)\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) and Laced(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) and Despised(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nforall x (Despised(x) and Cretaceous(x) -> Anonymous(x))\n\nnot Biconcave(cornelle)\n\ntherefore Biconcave(cornelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Gladis is rwandan. Gladis is raisable. Gladis is polygonal. Gladis is clawlike. Gladis is scowling. Gladis is unstained. Sheba is raisable. Sheba is scowling. Sheba is unstained. Laurena is rwandan. Laurena is raisable. Laurena is polygonal. Laurena is clawlike. Laurena is hooked. Laurena is scowling. Laurena is unstained. If someone is raisable and rwandan then they are polygonal. All hooked, scowling people are clawlike. All scowling, raisable people are hooked. Gladis is hooked.", "logic": "\nRwandan(gladis)\nRaisable(gladis)\nPolygonal(gladis)\nClawlike(gladis)\nScowling(gladis)\nUnstained(gladis)\nRaisable(sheba)\nScowling(sheba)\nUnstained(sheba)\nRwandan(laurena)\nRaisable(laurena)\nPolygonal(laurena)\nClawlike(laurena)\nHooked(laurena)\nScowling(laurena)\nUnstained(laurena)\nforall x (Raisable(x) and Rwandan(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Scowling(x) -> Clawlike(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Raisable(x) -> Hooked(x))\n\nHooked(gladis)\n\nScowling(gladis) and Raisable(gladis) and forall x (Scowling(x) and Raisable(x) -> Hooked(x)) -> therefore Hooked(gladis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Terrie is iron. Terrie is confusable. Terrie is satiric. Terrie is mesozoic. Terrie is algebraic. Terrie is astomatous. Davina is confusable. Davina is algebraic. Davina is astomatous. Nicoline is iron. Nicoline is confusable. Nicoline is satiric. Nicoline is mesozoic. Nicoline is insolvent. Nicoline is algebraic. Nicoline is astomatous. If someone is confusable and iron then they are satiric. All insolvent, algebraic people are mesozoic. All algebraic, confusable people are insolvent. Terrie is not insolvent.", "logic": "\nIron(terrie)\nConfusable(terrie)\nSatiric(terrie)\nMesozoic(terrie)\nAlgebraic(terrie)\nAstomatous(terrie)\nConfusable(davina)\nAlgebraic(davina)\nAstomatous(davina)\nIron(nicoline)\nConfusable(nicoline)\nSatiric(nicoline)\nMesozoic(nicoline)\nInsolvent(nicoline)\nAlgebraic(nicoline)\nAstomatous(nicoline)\nforall x (Confusable(x) and Iron(x) -> Satiric(x))\nforall x (Insolvent(x) and Algebraic(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) and Confusable(x) -> Insolvent(x))\n\nnot Insolvent(terrie)\n\nAlgebraic(terrie) and Confusable(terrie) and forall x (Algebraic(x) and Confusable(x) -> Insolvent(x)) -> therefore Insolvent(terrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Janeta is forested. Janeta is spinous. Janeta is flightless. Janeta is auroral. Janeta is disused. Janeta is uncrowded. Brittany is spinous. Brittany is disused. Brittany is uncrowded. Curtice is forested. Curtice is spinous. Curtice is flightless. Curtice is auroral. Curtice is wheelless. Curtice is disused. Curtice is uncrowded. If someone is spinous and forested then they are flightless. All wheelless, disused people are auroral. All disused, spinous people are wheelless. Brittany is auroral.", "logic": "\nForested(janeta)\nSpinous(janeta)\nFlightless(janeta)\nAuroral(janeta)\nDisused(janeta)\nUncrowded(janeta)\nSpinous(brittany)\nDisused(brittany)\nUncrowded(brittany)\nForested(curtice)\nSpinous(curtice)\nFlightless(curtice)\nAuroral(curtice)\nWheelless(curtice)\nDisused(curtice)\nUncrowded(curtice)\nforall x (Spinous(x) and Forested(x) -> Flightless(x))\nforall x (Wheelless(x) and Disused(x) -> Auroral(x))\nforall x (Disused(x) and Spinous(x) -> Wheelless(x))\n\nAuroral(brittany)\n\nDisused(brittany) and Spinous(brittany) and forall x (Disused(x) and Spinous(x) -> Wheelless(x)) -> therefore Wheelless(brittany) Wheelless(brittany) and Disused(brittany) and forall x (Wheelless(x) and Disused(x) -> Auroral(x)) -> therefore Auroral(brittany)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Hesther is crabby. Hesther is barky. Hesther is squint. Hesther is seagirt. Hesther is birken. Hesther is clammy. Waiter is barky. Waiter is birken. Waiter is clammy. Emanuela is crabby. Emanuela is barky. Emanuela is squint. Emanuela is seagirt. Emanuela is sugary. Emanuela is birken. Emanuela is clammy. If someone is barky and crabby then they are squint. All sugary, birken people are seagirt. All birken, barky people are sugary. Waiter is not seagirt.", "logic": "\nCrabby(hesther)\nBarky(hesther)\nSquint(hesther)\nSeagirt(hesther)\nBirken(hesther)\nClammy(hesther)\nBarky(waiter)\nBirken(waiter)\nClammy(waiter)\nCrabby(emanuela)\nBarky(emanuela)\nSquint(emanuela)\nSeagirt(emanuela)\nSugary(emanuela)\nBirken(emanuela)\nClammy(emanuela)\nforall x (Barky(x) and Crabby(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Sugary(x) and Birken(x) -> Seagirt(x))\nforall x (Birken(x) and Barky(x) -> Sugary(x))\n\nnot Seagirt(waiter)\n\nBirken(waiter) and Barky(waiter) and forall x (Birken(x) and Barky(x) -> Sugary(x)) -> therefore Sugary(waiter) Sugary(waiter) and Birken(waiter) and forall x (Sugary(x) and Birken(x) -> Seagirt(x)) -> therefore Seagirt(waiter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Sharron is tedious. Sharron is judicial. Sharron is anapestic. Sharron is bold. Sharron is inhumane. Sharron is swaybacked. Junina is judicial. Junina is inhumane. Junina is swaybacked. Abagael is tedious. Abagael is judicial. Abagael is anapestic. Abagael is bold. Abagael is rigorous. Abagael is inhumane. Abagael is swaybacked. If someone is judicial and tedious then they are anapestic. All rigorous, inhumane people are bold. All inhumane, judicial people are rigorous. Junina is not anapestic.", "logic": "\nTedious(sharron)\nJudicial(sharron)\nAnapestic(sharron)\nBold(sharron)\nInhumane(sharron)\nSwaybacked(sharron)\nJudicial(junina)\nInhumane(junina)\nSwaybacked(junina)\nTedious(abagael)\nJudicial(abagael)\nAnapestic(abagael)\nBold(abagael)\nRigorous(abagael)\nInhumane(abagael)\nSwaybacked(abagael)\nforall x (Judicial(x) and Tedious(x) -> Anapestic(x))\nforall x (Rigorous(x) and Inhumane(x) -> Bold(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Judicial(x) -> Rigorous(x))\n\nnot Anapestic(junina)\n\nforall x (Judicial(x) and Tedious(x) -> Anapestic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Johny is trig. Johny is aleuronic. Johny is pebbly. Johny is physical. Johny is slumberous. Johny is shipshape. Tammy is aleuronic. Tammy is slumberous. Tammy is shipshape. Riley is trig. Riley is aleuronic. Riley is pebbly. Riley is physical. Riley is misrelated. Riley is slumberous. Riley is shipshape. If someone is aleuronic and trig then they are pebbly. All misrelated, slumberous people are physical. All slumberous, aleuronic people are misrelated. Tammy is trig.", "logic": "\nTrig(johny)\nAleuronic(johny)\nPebbly(johny)\nPhysical(johny)\nSlumberous(johny)\nShipshape(johny)\nAleuronic(tammy)\nSlumberous(tammy)\nShipshape(tammy)\nTrig(riley)\nAleuronic(riley)\nPebbly(riley)\nPhysical(riley)\nMisrelated(riley)\nSlumberous(riley)\nShipshape(riley)\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Trig(x) -> Pebbly(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) and Slumberous(x) -> Physical(x))\nforall x (Slumberous(x) and Aleuronic(x) -> Misrelated(x))\n\nTrig(tammy)\n\nTrig(tammy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-952"} {"premises": "Corrina is expressed. Corrina is ailing. Corrina is untucked. Corrina is zoftig. Ernst is romani. Ernst is dropping. Ernst is zoftig. Davin is dropping. Davin is expressed. Vivyanne is romani. Vivyanne is scheming. Vivyanne is dropping. Vivyanne is expressed. Vivyanne is ailing. Vivyanne is untucked. Vivyanne is zoftig. All romani, dropping things are zoftig. Red, zoftig things are romani. All expressed, romani things are ailing. All romani things are scheming. All dropping things are scheming. If something is scheming then it is romani. Vivyanne is ailing.", "logic": "\nExpressed(corrina)\nAiling(corrina)\nUntucked(corrina)\nZoftig(corrina)\nRomani(ernst)\nDropping(ernst)\nZoftig(ernst)\nDropping(davin)\nExpressed(davin)\nRomani(vivyanne)\nScheming(vivyanne)\nDropping(vivyanne)\nExpressed(vivyanne)\nAiling(vivyanne)\nUntucked(vivyanne)\nZoftig(vivyanne)\nforall x (Romani(x) and Dropping(x) -> Zoftig(x))\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Zoftig(x) -> Romani(x))\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Romani(x) -> Ailing(x))\nforall x (Romani(x) -> Scheming(x))\nforall x (Dropping(x) -> Scheming(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) -> Romani(x))\n\nAiling(vivyanne)\n\ntherefore Ailing(vivyanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Izak is entranced. Izak is protanopic. Izak is totemic. Izak is binuclear. Storm is fated. Storm is unwilled. Storm is binuclear. Katrinka is unwilled. Katrinka is entranced. Melly is fated. Melly is bonelike. Melly is unwilled. Melly is entranced. Melly is protanopic. Melly is totemic. Melly is binuclear. All fated, unwilled things are binuclear. Red, binuclear things are fated. All entranced, fated things are protanopic. All fated things are bonelike. All unwilled things are bonelike. If something is bonelike then it is fated. Melly is not entranced.", "logic": "\nEntranced(izak)\nProtanopic(izak)\nTotemic(izak)\nBinuclear(izak)\nFated(storm)\nUnwilled(storm)\nBinuclear(storm)\nUnwilled(katrinka)\nEntranced(katrinka)\nFated(melly)\nBonelike(melly)\nUnwilled(melly)\nEntranced(melly)\nProtanopic(melly)\nTotemic(melly)\nBinuclear(melly)\nforall x (Fated(x) and Unwilled(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Entranced(x) and Binuclear(x) -> Fated(x))\nforall x (Entranced(x) and Fated(x) -> Protanopic(x))\nforall x (Fated(x) -> Bonelike(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) -> Bonelike(x))\nforall x (Bonelike(x) -> Fated(x))\n\nnot Entranced(melly)\n\ntherefore Entranced(melly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Nicholas is androgenic. Nicholas is noncyclic. Nicholas is conjoint. Nicholas is uneventful. Coraline is regnant. Coraline is assumptive. Coraline is uneventful. Stacee is assumptive. Stacee is androgenic. Rosette is regnant. Rosette is tasseled. Rosette is assumptive. Rosette is androgenic. Rosette is noncyclic. Rosette is conjoint. Rosette is uneventful. All regnant, assumptive things are uneventful. Red, uneventful things are regnant. All androgenic, regnant things are noncyclic. All regnant things are tasseled. All assumptive things are tasseled. If something is tasseled then it is regnant. Stacee is tasseled.", "logic": "\nAndrogenic(nicholas)\nNoncyclic(nicholas)\nConjoint(nicholas)\nUneventful(nicholas)\nRegnant(coraline)\nAssumptive(coraline)\nUneventful(coraline)\nAssumptive(stacee)\nAndrogenic(stacee)\nRegnant(rosette)\nTasseled(rosette)\nAssumptive(rosette)\nAndrogenic(rosette)\nNoncyclic(rosette)\nConjoint(rosette)\nUneventful(rosette)\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Assumptive(x) -> Uneventful(x))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) and Uneventful(x) -> Regnant(x))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) and Regnant(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> Regnant(x))\n\nTasseled(stacee)\n\nAssumptive(stacee) and forall x (Assumptive(x) -> Tasseled(x)) -> therefore Tasseled(stacee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Lindsay is intestinal. Lindsay is infective. Lindsay is selfsame. Lindsay is lifted. Lizzy is incidental. Lizzy is prisonlike. Lizzy is lifted. Ugo is prisonlike. Ugo is intestinal. Lewis is incidental. Lewis is coeliac. Lewis is prisonlike. Lewis is intestinal. Lewis is infective. Lewis is selfsame. Lewis is lifted. All incidental, prisonlike things are lifted. Red, lifted things are incidental. All intestinal, incidental things are infective. All incidental things are coeliac. All prisonlike things are coeliac. If something is coeliac then it is incidental. Lizzy is not coeliac.", "logic": "\nIntestinal(lindsay)\nInfective(lindsay)\nSelfsame(lindsay)\nLifted(lindsay)\nIncidental(lizzy)\nPrisonlike(lizzy)\nLifted(lizzy)\nPrisonlike(ugo)\nIntestinal(ugo)\nIncidental(lewis)\nCoeliac(lewis)\nPrisonlike(lewis)\nIntestinal(lewis)\nInfective(lewis)\nSelfsame(lewis)\nLifted(lewis)\nforall x (Incidental(x) and Prisonlike(x) -> Lifted(x))\nforall x (Intestinal(x) and Lifted(x) -> Incidental(x))\nforall x (Intestinal(x) and Incidental(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Incidental(x) -> Coeliac(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Coeliac(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Incidental(x))\n\nnot Coeliac(lizzy)\n\nIncidental(lizzy) and forall x (Incidental(x) -> Coeliac(x)) -> therefore Coeliac(lizzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Teodora is convulsive. Teodora is accrued. Teodora is southwest. Teodora is ingenious. Desaree is lovable. Desaree is zygodactyl. Desaree is ingenious. Ruthanne is zygodactyl. Ruthanne is convulsive. Winslow is lovable. Winslow is squared. Winslow is zygodactyl. Winslow is convulsive. Winslow is accrued. Winslow is southwest. Winslow is ingenious. All lovable, zygodactyl things are ingenious. Red, ingenious things are lovable. All convulsive, lovable things are accrued. All lovable things are squared. All zygodactyl things are squared. If something is squared then it is lovable. Teodora is squared.", "logic": "\nConvulsive(teodora)\nAccrued(teodora)\nSouthwest(teodora)\nIngenious(teodora)\nLovable(desaree)\nZygodactyl(desaree)\nIngenious(desaree)\nZygodactyl(ruthanne)\nConvulsive(ruthanne)\nLovable(winslow)\nSquared(winslow)\nZygodactyl(winslow)\nConvulsive(winslow)\nAccrued(winslow)\nSouthwest(winslow)\nIngenious(winslow)\nforall x (Lovable(x) and Zygodactyl(x) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Convulsive(x) and Ingenious(x) -> Lovable(x))\nforall x (Convulsive(x) and Lovable(x) -> Accrued(x))\nforall x (Lovable(x) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Zygodactyl(x) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Lovable(x))\n\nSquared(teodora)\n\nConvulsive(teodora) and Ingenious(teodora) and forall x (Convulsive(x) and Ingenious(x) -> Lovable(x)) -> therefore Lovable(teodora) Lovable(teodora) and forall x (Lovable(x) -> Squared(x)) -> therefore Squared(teodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Corenda is ladylike. Corenda is sinhala. Corenda is romaic. Corenda is dorsal. Anton is acrogenous. Anton is fused. Anton is dorsal. Dosi is fused. Dosi is ladylike. Yolane is acrogenous. Yolane is surging. Yolane is fused. Yolane is ladylike. Yolane is sinhala. Yolane is romaic. Yolane is dorsal. All acrogenous, fused things are dorsal. Red, dorsal things are acrogenous. All ladylike, acrogenous things are sinhala. All acrogenous things are surging. All fused things are surging. If something is surging then it is acrogenous. Dosi is not acrogenous.", "logic": "\nLadylike(corenda)\nSinhala(corenda)\nRomaic(corenda)\nDorsal(corenda)\nAcrogenous(anton)\nFused(anton)\nDorsal(anton)\nFused(dosi)\nLadylike(dosi)\nAcrogenous(yolane)\nSurging(yolane)\nFused(yolane)\nLadylike(yolane)\nSinhala(yolane)\nRomaic(yolane)\nDorsal(yolane)\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) and Fused(x) -> Dorsal(x))\nforall x (Ladylike(x) and Dorsal(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nforall x (Ladylike(x) and Acrogenous(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) -> Surging(x))\nforall x (Fused(x) -> Surging(x))\nforall x (Surging(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\n\nnot Acrogenous(dosi)\n\nFused(dosi) and forall x (Fused(x) -> Surging(x)) -> therefore Surging(dosi) Surging(dosi) and forall x (Surging(x) -> Acrogenous(x)) -> therefore Acrogenous(dosi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Gertie is willing. Gertie is fretted. Gertie is baffling. Gertie is equal. Bernette is fuddled. Bernette is stingless. Bernette is equal. Vannie is stingless. Vannie is willing. Stefania is fuddled. Stefania is upper. Stefania is stingless. Stefania is willing. Stefania is fretted. Stefania is baffling. Stefania is equal. All fuddled, stingless things are equal. Red, equal things are fuddled. All willing, fuddled things are fretted. All fuddled things are upper. All stingless things are upper. If something is upper then it is fuddled. Vannie is fretted.", "logic": "\nWilling(gertie)\nFretted(gertie)\nBaffling(gertie)\nEqual(gertie)\nFuddled(bernette)\nStingless(bernette)\nEqual(bernette)\nStingless(vannie)\nWilling(vannie)\nFuddled(stefania)\nUpper(stefania)\nStingless(stefania)\nWilling(stefania)\nFretted(stefania)\nBaffling(stefania)\nEqual(stefania)\nforall x (Fuddled(x) and Stingless(x) -> Equal(x))\nforall x (Willing(x) and Equal(x) -> Fuddled(x))\nforall x (Willing(x) and Fuddled(x) -> Fretted(x))\nforall x (Fuddled(x) -> Upper(x))\nforall x (Stingless(x) -> Upper(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Fuddled(x))\n\nFretted(vannie)\n\nStingless(vannie) and forall x (Stingless(x) -> Upper(x)) -> therefore Upper(vannie) Upper(vannie) and forall x (Upper(x) -> Fuddled(x)) -> therefore Fuddled(vannie) Willing(vannie) and Fuddled(vannie) and forall x (Willing(x) and Fuddled(x) -> Fretted(x)) -> therefore Fretted(vannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Ulrike is synonymous. Ulrike is nodular. Ulrike is unbleached. Ulrike is thermic. Armand is featured. Armand is working. Armand is thermic. Babette is working. Babette is synonymous. Odelia is featured. Odelia is diminutive. Odelia is working. Odelia is synonymous. Odelia is nodular. Odelia is unbleached. Odelia is thermic. All featured, working things are thermic. Red, thermic things are featured. All synonymous, featured things are nodular. All featured things are diminutive. All working things are diminutive. If something is diminutive then it is featured. Babette is not thermic.", "logic": "\nSynonymous(ulrike)\nNodular(ulrike)\nUnbleached(ulrike)\nThermic(ulrike)\nFeatured(armand)\nWorking(armand)\nThermic(armand)\nWorking(babette)\nSynonymous(babette)\nFeatured(odelia)\nDiminutive(odelia)\nWorking(odelia)\nSynonymous(odelia)\nNodular(odelia)\nUnbleached(odelia)\nThermic(odelia)\nforall x (Featured(x) and Working(x) -> Thermic(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) and Thermic(x) -> Featured(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) and Featured(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Featured(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Working(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> Featured(x))\n\nnot Thermic(babette)\n\nWorking(babette) and forall x (Working(x) -> Diminutive(x)) -> therefore Diminutive(babette) Diminutive(babette) and forall x (Diminutive(x) -> Featured(x)) -> therefore Featured(babette) Featured(babette) and Working(babette) and forall x (Featured(x) and Working(x) -> Thermic(x)) -> therefore Thermic(babette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Cissy is uneducated. Cissy is burry. Cissy is relaxant. Cissy is neurotic. Penelopa is loverlike. Penelopa is unused. Penelopa is neurotic. Elvin is unused. Elvin is uneducated. Gerda is loverlike. Gerda is unmodified. Gerda is unused. Gerda is uneducated. Gerda is burry. Gerda is relaxant. Gerda is neurotic. All loverlike, unused things are neurotic. Red, neurotic things are loverlike. All uneducated, loverlike things are burry. All loverlike things are unmodified. All unused things are unmodified. If something is unmodified then it is loverlike. Penelopa is not burry.", "logic": "\nUneducated(cissy)\nBurry(cissy)\nRelaxant(cissy)\nNeurotic(cissy)\nLoverlike(penelopa)\nUnused(penelopa)\nNeurotic(penelopa)\nUnused(elvin)\nUneducated(elvin)\nLoverlike(gerda)\nUnmodified(gerda)\nUnused(gerda)\nUneducated(gerda)\nBurry(gerda)\nRelaxant(gerda)\nNeurotic(gerda)\nforall x (Loverlike(x) and Unused(x) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Neurotic(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Loverlike(x) -> Burry(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Unmodified(x))\nforall x (Unused(x) -> Unmodified(x))\nforall x (Unmodified(x) -> Loverlike(x))\n\nnot Burry(penelopa)\n\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Loverlike(x) -> Burry(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Rycca is saccadic. Rycca is ungathered. Rycca is ruffled. Rycca is incapable. Zalman is less. Zalman is suicidal. Zalman is incapable. Randolph is suicidal. Randolph is saccadic. Henrie is less. Henrie is medial. Henrie is suicidal. Henrie is saccadic. Henrie is ungathered. Henrie is ruffled. Henrie is incapable. All less, suicidal things are incapable. Red, incapable things are less. All saccadic, less things are ungathered. All less things are medial. All suicidal things are medial. If something is medial then it is less. Rycca is suicidal.", "logic": "\nSaccadic(rycca)\nUngathered(rycca)\nRuffled(rycca)\nIncapable(rycca)\nLess(zalman)\nSuicidal(zalman)\nIncapable(zalman)\nSuicidal(randolph)\nSaccadic(randolph)\nLess(henrie)\nMedial(henrie)\nSuicidal(henrie)\nSaccadic(henrie)\nUngathered(henrie)\nRuffled(henrie)\nIncapable(henrie)\nforall x (Less(x) and Suicidal(x) -> Incapable(x))\nforall x (Saccadic(x) and Incapable(x) -> Less(x))\nforall x (Saccadic(x) and Less(x) -> Ungathered(x))\nforall x (Less(x) -> Medial(x))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) -> Medial(x))\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Less(x))\n\nSuicidal(rycca)\n\nSuicidal(rycca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Quinta is antiquated. Quinta is backstair. Quinta is striped. Quinta is sepaline. Cathyleen is unwoven. Cathyleen is laden. Cathyleen is sepaline. Rowena is laden. Rowena is antiquated. Rick is unwoven. Rick is amazed. Rick is laden. Rick is antiquated. Rick is backstair. Rick is striped. Rick is sepaline. All unwoven, laden things are sepaline. Red, sepaline things are unwoven. All antiquated, unwoven things are backstair. All unwoven things are amazed. All laden things are amazed. If something is amazed then it is unwoven. Rowena is not striped.", "logic": "\nAntiquated(quinta)\nBackstair(quinta)\nStriped(quinta)\nSepaline(quinta)\nUnwoven(cathyleen)\nLaden(cathyleen)\nSepaline(cathyleen)\nLaden(rowena)\nAntiquated(rowena)\nUnwoven(rick)\nAmazed(rick)\nLaden(rick)\nAntiquated(rick)\nBackstair(rick)\nStriped(rick)\nSepaline(rick)\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Laden(x) -> Sepaline(x))\nforall x (Antiquated(x) and Sepaline(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nforall x (Antiquated(x) and Unwoven(x) -> Backstair(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> Amazed(x))\nforall x (Laden(x) -> Amazed(x))\nforall x (Amazed(x) -> Unwoven(x))\n\nnot Striped(rowena)\n\nnot Striped(rowena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "Glynda is unwounded. Glynda is abulic. Glynda is slick. Glynda is benthal. Thalia is coccal. Thalia is seventieth. Thalia is benthal. Brendan is seventieth. Brendan is unwounded. Fidelity is coccal. Fidelity is perforated. Fidelity is seventieth. Fidelity is unwounded. Fidelity is abulic. Fidelity is slick. Fidelity is benthal. All coccal, seventieth things are benthal. Red, benthal things are coccal. All unwounded, coccal things are abulic. All coccal things are perforated. All seventieth things are perforated. If something is perforated then it is coccal. Thalia is slick.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(glynda)\nAbulic(glynda)\nSlick(glynda)\nBenthal(glynda)\nCoccal(thalia)\nSeventieth(thalia)\nBenthal(thalia)\nSeventieth(brendan)\nUnwounded(brendan)\nCoccal(fidelity)\nPerforated(fidelity)\nSeventieth(fidelity)\nUnwounded(fidelity)\nAbulic(fidelity)\nSlick(fidelity)\nBenthal(fidelity)\nforall x (Coccal(x) and Seventieth(x) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) and Benthal(x) -> Coccal(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) and Coccal(x) -> Abulic(x))\nforall x (Coccal(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Seventieth(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Perforated(x) -> Coccal(x))\n\nSlick(thalia)\n\nSlick(thalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The jess abase the shamus. The jess complicate the fons. The cary abase the shamus. The cary is coaxing. The cary is asthmatic. The fons abase the cary. The shamus outshout the fons. If something outshout the cary and it outshout the shamus then it outshout the fons. If something is coaxing and asthmatic then it is sorrowing. If the cary is poor and the cary is undefeated then the cary outshout the fons. If something is coaxing and sorrowing then it abase the shamus. If something abase the jess then the jess abase the cary. If something is sorrowing and it complicate the fons then it is asthmatic. If something is sorrowing and it complicate the jess then the jess complicate the fons. If something is sorrowing and coaxing then it abase the jess. The cary is asthmatic.", "logic": "\nAbase(jess, shamus)\nComplicate(jess, fons)\nAbase(cary, shamus)\nCoaxing(cary)\nAsthmatic(cary)\nAbase(fons, cary)\nOutshout(shamus, fons)\nforall x (Outshout(x, cary) and Outshout(x, shamus) -> Outshout(x, fons))\nforall x (Coaxing(x) and Asthmatic(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\nPoor(cary) and Undefeated(cary) -> Outshout(cary, fons)\nforall x (Coaxing(x) and Sorrowing(x) -> Abase(x, shamus))\nforall x (Abase(x, jess) -> Abase(jess, cary))\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) and Complicate(x, fons) -> Asthmatic(x))\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) and Complicate(x, jess) -> Complicate(jess, fons))\nforall x (Sorrowing(x) and Coaxing(x) -> Abase(x, jess))\n\nAsthmatic(cary)\n\ntherefore Asthmatic(cary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The lorita skirt the dael. The lorita dogmatise the pam. The tani skirt the dael. The tani is palliative. The tani is plucked. The pam skirt the tani. The dael brutalise the pam. If something brutalise the tani and it brutalise the dael then it brutalise the pam. If something is palliative and plucked then it is fazed. If the tani is undulant and the tani is affluent then the tani brutalise the pam. If something is palliative and fazed then it skirt the dael. If something skirt the lorita then the lorita skirt the tani. If something is fazed and it dogmatise the pam then it is plucked. If something is fazed and it dogmatise the lorita then the lorita dogmatise the pam. If something is fazed and palliative then it skirt the lorita. The lorita does not eat the dael.", "logic": "\nSkirt(lorita, dael)\nDogmatise(lorita, pam)\nSkirt(tani, dael)\nPalliative(tani)\nPlucked(tani)\nSkirt(pam, tani)\nBrutalise(dael, pam)\nforall x (Brutalise(x, tani) and Brutalise(x, dael) -> Brutalise(x, pam))\nforall x (Palliative(x) and Plucked(x) -> Fazed(x))\nUndulant(tani) and Affluent(tani) -> Brutalise(tani, pam)\nforall x (Palliative(x) and Fazed(x) -> Skirt(x, dael))\nforall x (Skirt(x, lorita) -> Skirt(lorita, tani))\nforall x (Fazed(x) and Dogmatise(x, pam) -> Plucked(x))\nforall x (Fazed(x) and Dogmatise(x, lorita) -> Dogmatise(lorita, pam))\nforall x (Fazed(x) and Palliative(x) -> Skirt(x, lorita))\n\nnot Skirt(lorita, dael)\n\ntherefore Skirt(lorita, dael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The fayina simper the emelia. The fayina poke the lolande. The claretta simper the emelia. The claretta is collected. The claretta is adolescent. The lolande simper the claretta. The emelia retrovert the lolande. If something retrovert the claretta and it retrovert the emelia then it retrovert the lolande. If something is collected and adolescent then it is paired. If the claretta is packable and the claretta is unifoliate then the claretta retrovert the lolande. If something is collected and paired then it simper the emelia. If something simper the fayina then the fayina simper the claretta. If something is paired and it poke the lolande then it is adolescent. If something is paired and it poke the fayina then the fayina poke the lolande. If something is paired and collected then it simper the fayina. The claretta is paired.", "logic": "\nSimper(fayina, emelia)\nPoke(fayina, lolande)\nSimper(claretta, emelia)\nCollected(claretta)\nAdolescent(claretta)\nSimper(lolande, claretta)\nRetrovert(emelia, lolande)\nforall x (Retrovert(x, claretta) and Retrovert(x, emelia) -> Retrovert(x, lolande))\nforall x (Collected(x) and Adolescent(x) -> Paired(x))\nPackable(claretta) and Unifoliate(claretta) -> Retrovert(claretta, lolande)\nforall x (Collected(x) and Paired(x) -> Simper(x, emelia))\nforall x (Simper(x, fayina) -> Simper(fayina, claretta))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Poke(x, lolande) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Poke(x, fayina) -> Poke(fayina, lolande))\nforall x (Paired(x) and Collected(x) -> Simper(x, fayina))\n\nPaired(claretta)\n\nCollected(claretta) and Adolescent(claretta) and forall x (Collected(x) and Adolescent(x) -> Paired(x)) -> therefore Paired(claretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The theo reface the prent. The theo divagate the somerset. The edita reface the prent. The edita is bosnian. The edita is outre. The somerset reface the edita. The prent envy the somerset. If something envy the edita and it envy the prent then it envy the somerset. If something is bosnian and outre then it is ruffled. If the edita is entire and the edita is multiform then the edita envy the somerset. If something is bosnian and ruffled then it reface the prent. If something reface the theo then the theo reface the edita. If something is ruffled and it divagate the somerset then it is outre. If something is ruffled and it divagate the theo then the theo divagate the somerset. If something is ruffled and bosnian then it reface the theo. The edita is not ruffled.", "logic": "\nReface(theo, prent)\nDivagate(theo, somerset)\nReface(edita, prent)\nBosnian(edita)\nOutre(edita)\nReface(somerset, edita)\nEnvy(prent, somerset)\nforall x (Envy(x, edita) and Envy(x, prent) -> Envy(x, somerset))\nforall x (Bosnian(x) and Outre(x) -> Ruffled(x))\nEntire(edita) and Multiform(edita) -> Envy(edita, somerset)\nforall x (Bosnian(x) and Ruffled(x) -> Reface(x, prent))\nforall x (Reface(x, theo) -> Reface(theo, edita))\nforall x (Ruffled(x) and Divagate(x, somerset) -> Outre(x))\nforall x (Ruffled(x) and Divagate(x, theo) -> Divagate(theo, somerset))\nforall x (Ruffled(x) and Bosnian(x) -> Reface(x, theo))\n\nnot Ruffled(edita)\n\nBosnian(edita) and Outre(edita) and forall x (Bosnian(x) and Outre(x) -> Ruffled(x)) -> therefore Ruffled(edita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The corinne uncover the chanda. The corinne alcoholize the essa. The nike uncover the chanda. The nike is ratified. The nike is gnomish. The essa uncover the nike. The chanda aggrade the essa. If something aggrade the nike and it aggrade the chanda then it aggrade the essa. If something is ratified and gnomish then it is splay. If the nike is gauche and the nike is dogmatical then the nike aggrade the essa. If something is ratified and splay then it uncover the chanda. If something uncover the corinne then the corinne uncover the nike. If something is splay and it alcoholize the essa then it is gnomish. If something is splay and it alcoholize the corinne then the corinne alcoholize the essa. If something is splay and ratified then it uncover the corinne. The nike uncover the corinne.", "logic": "\nUncover(corinne, chanda)\nAlcoholize(corinne, essa)\nUncover(nike, chanda)\nRatified(nike)\nGnomish(nike)\nUncover(essa, nike)\nAggrade(chanda, essa)\nforall x (Aggrade(x, nike) and Aggrade(x, chanda) -> Aggrade(x, essa))\nforall x (Ratified(x) and Gnomish(x) -> Splay(x))\nGauche(nike) and Dogmatical(nike) -> Aggrade(nike, essa)\nforall x (Ratified(x) and Splay(x) -> Uncover(x, chanda))\nforall x (Uncover(x, corinne) -> Uncover(corinne, nike))\nforall x (Splay(x) and Alcoholize(x, essa) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) and Alcoholize(x, corinne) -> Alcoholize(corinne, essa))\nforall x (Splay(x) and Ratified(x) -> Uncover(x, corinne))\n\nUncover(nike, corinne)\n\nRatified(nike) and Gnomish(nike) and forall x (Ratified(x) and Gnomish(x) -> Splay(x)) -> therefore Splay(nike) Splay(nike) and Ratified(nike) and forall x (Splay(x) and Ratified(x) -> Uncover(x, corinne)) -> therefore Uncover(nike, corinne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The harlie coiffure the cordula. The harlie trend the glen. The shannan coiffure the cordula. The shannan is chargeable. The shannan is milklike. The glen coiffure the shannan. The cordula unhook the glen. If something unhook the shannan and it unhook the cordula then it unhook the glen. If something is chargeable and milklike then it is glottal. If the shannan is uninitiate and the shannan is ranging then the shannan unhook the glen. If something is chargeable and glottal then it coiffure the cordula. If something coiffure the harlie then the harlie coiffure the shannan. If something is glottal and it trend the glen then it is milklike. If something is glottal and it trend the harlie then the harlie trend the glen. If something is glottal and chargeable then it coiffure the harlie. The shannan does not eat the harlie.", "logic": "\nCoiffure(harlie, cordula)\nTrend(harlie, glen)\nCoiffure(shannan, cordula)\nChargeable(shannan)\nMilklike(shannan)\nCoiffure(glen, shannan)\nUnhook(cordula, glen)\nforall x (Unhook(x, shannan) and Unhook(x, cordula) -> Unhook(x, glen))\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and Milklike(x) -> Glottal(x))\nUninitiate(shannan) and Ranging(shannan) -> Unhook(shannan, glen)\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and Glottal(x) -> Coiffure(x, cordula))\nforall x (Coiffure(x, harlie) -> Coiffure(harlie, shannan))\nforall x (Glottal(x) and Trend(x, glen) -> Milklike(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) and Trend(x, harlie) -> Trend(harlie, glen))\nforall x (Glottal(x) and Chargeable(x) -> Coiffure(x, harlie))\n\nnot Coiffure(shannan, harlie)\n\nChargeable(shannan) and Milklike(shannan) and forall x (Chargeable(x) and Milklike(x) -> Glottal(x)) -> therefore Glottal(shannan) Glottal(shannan) and Chargeable(shannan) and forall x (Glottal(x) and Chargeable(x) -> Coiffure(x, harlie)) -> therefore Coiffure(shannan, harlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The milissent sodomise the purcell. The milissent enounce the thalia. The glenine sodomise the purcell. The glenine is albitic. The glenine is expendable. The thalia sodomise the glenine. The purcell spritz the thalia. If something spritz the glenine and it spritz the purcell then it spritz the thalia. If something is albitic and expendable then it is musing. If the glenine is barbed and the glenine is mysterious then the glenine spritz the thalia. If something is albitic and musing then it sodomise the purcell. If something sodomise the milissent then the milissent sodomise the glenine. If something is musing and it enounce the thalia then it is expendable. If something is musing and it enounce the milissent then the milissent enounce the thalia. If something is musing and albitic then it sodomise the milissent. The milissent sodomise the glenine.", "logic": "\nSodomise(milissent, purcell)\nEnounce(milissent, thalia)\nSodomise(glenine, purcell)\nAlbitic(glenine)\nExpendable(glenine)\nSodomise(thalia, glenine)\nSpritz(purcell, thalia)\nforall x (Spritz(x, glenine) and Spritz(x, purcell) -> Spritz(x, thalia))\nforall x (Albitic(x) and Expendable(x) -> Musing(x))\nBarbed(glenine) and Mysterious(glenine) -> Spritz(glenine, thalia)\nforall x (Albitic(x) and Musing(x) -> Sodomise(x, purcell))\nforall x (Sodomise(x, milissent) -> Sodomise(milissent, glenine))\nforall x (Musing(x) and Enounce(x, thalia) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Musing(x) and Enounce(x, milissent) -> Enounce(milissent, thalia))\nforall x (Musing(x) and Albitic(x) -> Sodomise(x, milissent))\n\nSodomise(milissent, glenine)\n\nAlbitic(glenine) and Expendable(glenine) and forall x (Albitic(x) and Expendable(x) -> Musing(x)) -> therefore Musing(glenine) Musing(glenine) and Albitic(glenine) and forall x (Musing(x) and Albitic(x) -> Sodomise(x, milissent)) -> therefore Sodomise(glenine, milissent) Sodomise(glenine, milissent) and forall x (Sodomise(x, milissent) -> Sodomise(milissent, glenine)) -> therefore Sodomise(milissent, glenine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The giuseppe unsaddle the zebulon. The giuseppe auspicate the fernande. The jenda unsaddle the zebulon. The jenda is terrene. The jenda is echoic. The fernande unsaddle the jenda. The zebulon metal the fernande. If something metal the jenda and it metal the zebulon then it metal the fernande. If something is terrene and echoic then it is philistine. If the jenda is grassy and the jenda is orderly then the jenda metal the fernande. If something is terrene and philistine then it unsaddle the zebulon. If something unsaddle the giuseppe then the giuseppe unsaddle the jenda. If something is philistine and it auspicate the fernande then it is echoic. If something is philistine and it auspicate the giuseppe then the giuseppe auspicate the fernande. If something is philistine and terrene then it unsaddle the giuseppe. The giuseppe does not eat the jenda.", "logic": "\nUnsaddle(giuseppe, zebulon)\nAuspicate(giuseppe, fernande)\nUnsaddle(jenda, zebulon)\nTerrene(jenda)\nEchoic(jenda)\nUnsaddle(fernande, jenda)\nMetal(zebulon, fernande)\nforall x (Metal(x, jenda) and Metal(x, zebulon) -> Metal(x, fernande))\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Echoic(x) -> Philistine(x))\nGrassy(jenda) and Orderly(jenda) -> Metal(jenda, fernande)\nforall x (Terrene(x) and Philistine(x) -> Unsaddle(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Unsaddle(x, giuseppe) -> Unsaddle(giuseppe, jenda))\nforall x (Philistine(x) and Auspicate(x, fernande) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Philistine(x) and Auspicate(x, giuseppe) -> Auspicate(giuseppe, fernande))\nforall x (Philistine(x) and Terrene(x) -> Unsaddle(x, giuseppe))\n\nnot Unsaddle(giuseppe, jenda)\n\nTerrene(jenda) and Echoic(jenda) and forall x (Terrene(x) and Echoic(x) -> Philistine(x)) -> therefore Philistine(jenda) Philistine(jenda) and Terrene(jenda) and forall x (Philistine(x) and Terrene(x) -> Unsaddle(x, giuseppe)) -> therefore Unsaddle(jenda, giuseppe) Unsaddle(jenda, giuseppe) and forall x (Unsaddle(x, giuseppe) -> Unsaddle(giuseppe, jenda)) -> therefore Unsaddle(giuseppe, jenda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The ramsey analyze the alma. The ramsey slag the elysia. The kitti analyze the alma. The kitti is boughless. The kitti is arboresque. The elysia analyze the kitti. The alma blub the elysia. If something blub the kitti and it blub the alma then it blub the elysia. If something is boughless and arboresque then it is stalemated. If the kitti is monthlong and the kitti is armoured then the kitti blub the elysia. If something is boughless and stalemated then it analyze the alma. If something analyze the ramsey then the ramsey analyze the kitti. If something is stalemated and it slag the elysia then it is arboresque. If something is stalemated and it slag the ramsey then the ramsey slag the elysia. If something is stalemated and boughless then it analyze the ramsey. The elysia is not arboresque.", "logic": "\nAnalyze(ramsey, alma)\nSlag(ramsey, elysia)\nAnalyze(kitti, alma)\nBoughless(kitti)\nArboresque(kitti)\nAnalyze(elysia, kitti)\nBlub(alma, elysia)\nforall x (Blub(x, kitti) and Blub(x, alma) -> Blub(x, elysia))\nforall x (Boughless(x) and Arboresque(x) -> Stalemated(x))\nMonthlong(kitti) and Armoured(kitti) -> Blub(kitti, elysia)\nforall x (Boughless(x) and Stalemated(x) -> Analyze(x, alma))\nforall x (Analyze(x, ramsey) -> Analyze(ramsey, kitti))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Slag(x, elysia) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Slag(x, ramsey) -> Slag(ramsey, elysia))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Boughless(x) -> Analyze(x, ramsey))\n\nnot Arboresque(elysia)\n\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Slag(x, elysia) -> Arboresque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The quint detour the konstance. The quint tally the danella. The dot detour the konstance. The dot is bodily. The dot is fragrant. The danella detour the dot. The konstance consume the danella. If something consume the dot and it consume the konstance then it consume the danella. If something is bodily and fragrant then it is soulful. If the dot is prolix and the dot is furred then the dot consume the danella. If something is bodily and soulful then it detour the konstance. If something detour the quint then the quint detour the dot. If something is soulful and it tally the danella then it is fragrant. If something is soulful and it tally the quint then the quint tally the danella. If something is soulful and bodily then it detour the quint. The konstance is fragrant.", "logic": "\nDetour(quint, konstance)\nTally(quint, danella)\nDetour(dot, konstance)\nBodily(dot)\nFragrant(dot)\nDetour(danella, dot)\nConsume(konstance, danella)\nforall x (Consume(x, dot) and Consume(x, konstance) -> Consume(x, danella))\nforall x (Bodily(x) and Fragrant(x) -> Soulful(x))\nProlix(dot) and Furred(dot) -> Consume(dot, danella)\nforall x (Bodily(x) and Soulful(x) -> Detour(x, konstance))\nforall x (Detour(x, quint) -> Detour(quint, dot))\nforall x (Soulful(x) and Tally(x, danella) -> Fragrant(x))\nforall x (Soulful(x) and Tally(x, quint) -> Tally(quint, danella))\nforall x (Soulful(x) and Bodily(x) -> Detour(x, quint))\n\nFragrant(konstance)\n\nforall x (Soulful(x) and Tally(x, danella) -> Fragrant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The alastair hydrolyse the arlinda. The alastair crouch the padraig. The revkah hydrolyse the arlinda. The revkah is idolised. The revkah is cismontane. The padraig hydrolyse the revkah. The arlinda rasp the padraig. If something rasp the revkah and it rasp the arlinda then it rasp the padraig. If something is idolised and cismontane then it is dipylon. If the revkah is saxon and the revkah is puzzled then the revkah rasp the padraig. If something is idolised and dipylon then it hydrolyse the arlinda. If something hydrolyse the alastair then the alastair hydrolyse the revkah. If something is dipylon and it crouch the padraig then it is cismontane. If something is dipylon and it crouch the alastair then the alastair crouch the padraig. If something is dipylon and idolised then it hydrolyse the alastair. The padraig does not like the padraig.", "logic": "\nHydrolyse(alastair, arlinda)\nCrouch(alastair, padraig)\nHydrolyse(revkah, arlinda)\nIdolised(revkah)\nCismontane(revkah)\nHydrolyse(padraig, revkah)\nRasp(arlinda, padraig)\nforall x (Rasp(x, revkah) and Rasp(x, arlinda) -> Rasp(x, padraig))\nforall x (Idolised(x) and Cismontane(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nSaxon(revkah) and Puzzled(revkah) -> Rasp(revkah, padraig)\nforall x (Idolised(x) and Dipylon(x) -> Hydrolyse(x, arlinda))\nforall x (Hydrolyse(x, alastair) -> Hydrolyse(alastair, revkah))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and Crouch(x, padraig) -> Cismontane(x))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and Crouch(x, alastair) -> Crouch(alastair, padraig))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and Idolised(x) -> Hydrolyse(x, alastair))\n\nnot Rasp(padraig, padraig)\n\nforall x (Rasp(x, revkah) and Rasp(x, arlinda) -> Rasp(x, padraig)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The maryl champion the cyb. The maryl grapple the jessica. The maybelle champion the cyb. The maybelle is minded. The maybelle is mineral. The jessica champion the maybelle. The cyb bide the jessica. If something bide the maybelle and it bide the cyb then it bide the jessica. If something is minded and mineral then it is tinkly. If the maybelle is delphic and the maybelle is assuring then the maybelle bide the jessica. If something is minded and tinkly then it champion the cyb. If something champion the maryl then the maryl champion the maybelle. If something is tinkly and it grapple the jessica then it is mineral. If something is tinkly and it grapple the maryl then the maryl grapple the jessica. If something is tinkly and minded then it champion the maryl. The maybelle bide the jessica.", "logic": "\nChampion(maryl, cyb)\nGrapple(maryl, jessica)\nChampion(maybelle, cyb)\nMinded(maybelle)\nMineral(maybelle)\nChampion(jessica, maybelle)\nBide(cyb, jessica)\nforall x (Bide(x, maybelle) and Bide(x, cyb) -> Bide(x, jessica))\nforall x (Minded(x) and Mineral(x) -> Tinkly(x))\nDelphic(maybelle) and Assuring(maybelle) -> Bide(maybelle, jessica)\nforall x (Minded(x) and Tinkly(x) -> Champion(x, cyb))\nforall x (Champion(x, maryl) -> Champion(maryl, maybelle))\nforall x (Tinkly(x) and Grapple(x, jessica) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Tinkly(x) and Grapple(x, maryl) -> Grapple(maryl, jessica))\nforall x (Tinkly(x) and Minded(x) -> Champion(x, maryl))\n\nBide(maybelle, jessica)\n\nforall x (Bide(x, maybelle) and Bide(x, cyb) -> Bide(x, jessica)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The newton blanket the florinda. The newton miscount the elmore. The tera blanket the florinda. The tera is pledged. The tera is brief. The elmore blanket the tera. The florinda restitute the elmore. If something restitute the tera and it restitute the florinda then it restitute the elmore. If something is pledged and brief then it is fungoid. If the tera is shona and the tera is nazarene then the tera restitute the elmore. If something is pledged and fungoid then it blanket the florinda. If something blanket the newton then the newton blanket the tera. If something is fungoid and it miscount the elmore then it is brief. If something is fungoid and it miscount the newton then the newton miscount the elmore. If something is fungoid and pledged then it blanket the newton. The florinda does not eat the tera.", "logic": "\nBlanket(newton, florinda)\nMiscount(newton, elmore)\nBlanket(tera, florinda)\nPledged(tera)\nBrief(tera)\nBlanket(elmore, tera)\nRestitute(florinda, elmore)\nforall x (Restitute(x, tera) and Restitute(x, florinda) -> Restitute(x, elmore))\nforall x (Pledged(x) and Brief(x) -> Fungoid(x))\nShona(tera) and Nazarene(tera) -> Restitute(tera, elmore)\nforall x (Pledged(x) and Fungoid(x) -> Blanket(x, florinda))\nforall x (Blanket(x, newton) -> Blanket(newton, tera))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and Miscount(x, elmore) -> Brief(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and Miscount(x, newton) -> Miscount(newton, elmore))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and Pledged(x) -> Blanket(x, newton))\n\nnot Blanket(florinda, tera)\n\nnot Blanket(florinda, tera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The burgess incline the hillary. The burgess encode the miriam. The salmon incline the hillary. The salmon is moonless. The salmon is wolflike. The miriam incline the salmon. The hillary fracture the miriam. If something fracture the salmon and it fracture the hillary then it fracture the miriam. If something is moonless and wolflike then it is popeyed. If the salmon is deafened and the salmon is unartistic then the salmon fracture the miriam. If something is moonless and popeyed then it incline the hillary. If something incline the burgess then the burgess incline the salmon. If something is popeyed and it encode the miriam then it is wolflike. If something is popeyed and it encode the burgess then the burgess encode the miriam. If something is popeyed and moonless then it incline the burgess. The salmon fracture the salmon.", "logic": "\nIncline(burgess, hillary)\nEncode(burgess, miriam)\nIncline(salmon, hillary)\nMoonless(salmon)\nWolflike(salmon)\nIncline(miriam, salmon)\nFracture(hillary, miriam)\nforall x (Fracture(x, salmon) and Fracture(x, hillary) -> Fracture(x, miriam))\nforall x (Moonless(x) and Wolflike(x) -> Popeyed(x))\nDeafened(salmon) and Unartistic(salmon) -> Fracture(salmon, miriam)\nforall x (Moonless(x) and Popeyed(x) -> Incline(x, hillary))\nforall x (Incline(x, burgess) -> Incline(burgess, salmon))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) and Encode(x, miriam) -> Wolflike(x))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) and Encode(x, burgess) -> Encode(burgess, miriam))\nforall x (Popeyed(x) and Moonless(x) -> Incline(x, burgess))\n\nFracture(salmon, salmon)\n\nFracture(salmon, salmon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The fannie clop the dimitrios. The fannie ransom the charmain. The adaline clop the dimitrios. The adaline is costly. The adaline is inward. The charmain clop the adaline. The dimitrios coiffe the charmain. If something coiffe the adaline and it coiffe the dimitrios then it coiffe the charmain. If something is costly and inward then it is liberated. If the adaline is curst and the adaline is maledict then the adaline coiffe the charmain. If something is costly and liberated then it clop the dimitrios. If something clop the fannie then the fannie clop the adaline. If something is liberated and it ransom the charmain then it is inward. If something is liberated and it ransom the fannie then the fannie ransom the charmain. If something is liberated and costly then it clop the fannie. The dimitrios does not need the dimitrios.", "logic": "\nClop(fannie, dimitrios)\nRansom(fannie, charmain)\nClop(adaline, dimitrios)\nCostly(adaline)\nInward(adaline)\nClop(charmain, adaline)\nCoiffe(dimitrios, charmain)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, adaline) and Coiffe(x, dimitrios) -> Coiffe(x, charmain))\nforall x (Costly(x) and Inward(x) -> Liberated(x))\nCurst(adaline) and Maledict(adaline) -> Coiffe(adaline, charmain)\nforall x (Costly(x) and Liberated(x) -> Clop(x, dimitrios))\nforall x (Clop(x, fannie) -> Clop(fannie, adaline))\nforall x (Liberated(x) and Ransom(x, charmain) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) and Ransom(x, fannie) -> Ransom(fannie, charmain))\nforall x (Liberated(x) and Costly(x) -> Clop(x, fannie))\n\nnot Ransom(dimitrios, dimitrios)\n\nnot Ransom(dimitrios, dimitrios) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The tandie disabuse the justina. The tandie baste the annalise. The amaleta disabuse the justina. The amaleta is billiard. The amaleta is perceptive. The annalise disabuse the amaleta. The justina nurture the annalise. If something nurture the amaleta and it nurture the justina then it nurture the annalise. If something is billiard and perceptive then it is unripe. If the amaleta is frankish and the amaleta is apathetic then the amaleta nurture the annalise. If something is billiard and unripe then it disabuse the justina. If something disabuse the tandie then the tandie disabuse the amaleta. If something is unripe and it baste the annalise then it is perceptive. If something is unripe and it baste the tandie then the tandie baste the annalise. If something is unripe and billiard then it disabuse the tandie. The amaleta disabuse the annalise.", "logic": "\nDisabuse(tandie, justina)\nBaste(tandie, annalise)\nDisabuse(amaleta, justina)\nBilliard(amaleta)\nPerceptive(amaleta)\nDisabuse(annalise, amaleta)\nNurture(justina, annalise)\nforall x (Nurture(x, amaleta) and Nurture(x, justina) -> Nurture(x, annalise))\nforall x (Billiard(x) and Perceptive(x) -> Unripe(x))\nFrankish(amaleta) and Apathetic(amaleta) -> Nurture(amaleta, annalise)\nforall x (Billiard(x) and Unripe(x) -> Disabuse(x, justina))\nforall x (Disabuse(x, tandie) -> Disabuse(tandie, amaleta))\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Baste(x, annalise) -> Perceptive(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Baste(x, tandie) -> Baste(tandie, annalise))\nforall x (Unripe(x) and Billiard(x) -> Disabuse(x, tandie))\n\nDisabuse(amaleta, annalise)\n\nDisabuse(amaleta, annalise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1340"} {"premises": "The clemence jockey the cordelia. The clemence transact the cordelia. The clemence slenderise the cordelia. The cordelia transact the paulo. The cordelia slenderise the sandy. The paulo is bedraggled. The sandy transact the clemence. If something jockey the clemence and the clemence transact the paulo then the paulo transact the cordelia. If something transact the paulo and it is not edifying then the paulo slenderise the sandy. The clemence slenderise the cordelia.", "logic": "\nJockey(clemence, cordelia)\nTransact(clemence, cordelia)\nSlenderise(clemence, cordelia)\nTransact(cordelia, paulo)\nSlenderise(cordelia, sandy)\nBedraggled(paulo)\nTransact(sandy, clemence)\nforall x (Jockey(x, clemence) and Transact(clemence, paulo) -> Transact(paulo, cordelia))\nforall x (Transact(x, paulo) and not Edifying(x) -> Slenderise(paulo, sandy))\n\nSlenderise(clemence, cordelia)\n\ntherefore Slenderise(clemence, cordelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2824"} {"premises": "The bendite divert the merissa. The bendite reply the merissa. The bendite overtake the merissa. The merissa reply the gael. The merissa overtake the camila. The gael is brisk. The camila reply the bendite. If something divert the bendite and the bendite reply the gael then the gael reply the merissa. If something reply the gael and it is not jolly then the gael overtake the camila. The gael is not brisk.", "logic": "\nDivert(bendite, merissa)\nReply(bendite, merissa)\nOvertake(bendite, merissa)\nReply(merissa, gael)\nOvertake(merissa, camila)\nBrisk(gael)\nReply(camila, bendite)\nforall x (Divert(x, bendite) and Reply(bendite, gael) -> Reply(gael, merissa))\nforall x (Reply(x, gael) and not Jolly(x) -> Overtake(gael, camila))\n\nnot Brisk(gael)\n\ntherefore Brisk(gael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2824"} {"premises": "The daryn skive the tuckie. The daryn corkscrew the tuckie. The daryn schematize the tuckie. The tuckie corkscrew the celine. The tuckie schematize the alexei. The celine is luxuriant. The alexei corkscrew the daryn. If something skive the daryn and the daryn corkscrew the celine then the celine corkscrew the tuckie. If something corkscrew the celine and it is not maudlin then the celine schematize the alexei. The celine does not see the tuckie.", "logic": "\nSkive(daryn, tuckie)\nCorkscrew(daryn, tuckie)\nSchematize(daryn, tuckie)\nCorkscrew(tuckie, celine)\nSchematize(tuckie, alexei)\nLuxuriant(celine)\nCorkscrew(alexei, daryn)\nforall x (Skive(x, daryn) and Corkscrew(daryn, celine) -> Corkscrew(celine, tuckie))\nforall x (Corkscrew(x, celine) and not Maudlin(x) -> Schematize(celine, alexei))\n\nnot Corkscrew(celine, tuckie)\n\nforall x (Skive(x, daryn) and Corkscrew(daryn, celine) -> Corkscrew(celine, tuckie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2824"} {"premises": "The babita munition the marney. The babita summerise the marney. The babita asterisk the marney. The marney summerise the karlyn. The marney asterisk the brinkley. The karlyn is oceangoing. The brinkley summerise the babita. If something munition the babita and the babita summerise the karlyn then the karlyn summerise the marney. If something summerise the karlyn and it is not semestrial then the karlyn asterisk the brinkley. The karlyn munition the karlyn.", "logic": "\nMunition(babita, marney)\nSummerise(babita, marney)\nAsterisk(babita, marney)\nSummerise(marney, karlyn)\nAsterisk(marney, brinkley)\nOceangoing(karlyn)\nSummerise(brinkley, babita)\nforall x (Munition(x, babita) and Summerise(babita, karlyn) -> Summerise(karlyn, marney))\nforall x (Summerise(x, karlyn) and not Semestrial(x) -> Asterisk(karlyn, brinkley))\n\nMunition(karlyn, karlyn)\n\nMunition(karlyn, karlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2824"} {"premises": "The josef is quadrate. The josef is refreshing. The josef groan the myrna. The josef groan the perrine. The josef signalize the myrna. The josef commission the perrine. The myrna is homegrown. The myrna groan the josef. The myrna groan the perrine. The myrna signalize the perrine. The myrna commission the josef. The myrna commission the perrine. The perrine is tragicomic. The perrine groan the josef. The perrine commission the josef. The perrine commission the myrna. If something commission the myrna then it groan the perrine. Young things are tragicomic. If something is quadrate and it commission the josef then the josef groan the perrine. If something groan the myrna then it is quadrate. If something commission the perrine and it is homegrown then it groan the myrna. If something is homegrown and it commission the myrna then it groan the josef. The josef commission the perrine.", "logic": "\nQuadrate(josef)\nRefreshing(josef)\nGroan(josef, myrna)\nGroan(josef, perrine)\nSignalize(josef, myrna)\nCommission(josef, perrine)\nHomegrown(myrna)\nGroan(myrna, josef)\nGroan(myrna, perrine)\nSignalize(myrna, perrine)\nCommission(myrna, josef)\nCommission(myrna, perrine)\nTragicomic(perrine)\nGroan(perrine, josef)\nCommission(perrine, josef)\nCommission(perrine, myrna)\nforall x (Commission(x, myrna) -> Groan(x, perrine))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) -> Tragicomic(x))\nforall x (Quadrate(x) and Commission(x, josef) -> Groan(josef, perrine))\nforall x (Groan(x, myrna) -> Quadrate(x))\nforall x (Commission(x, perrine) and Homegrown(x) -> Groan(x, myrna))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) and Commission(x, myrna) -> Groan(x, josef))\n\nCommission(josef, perrine)\n\ntherefore Commission(josef, perrine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "The ceciley is needless. The ceciley is pseudo. The ceciley normalise the gavin. The ceciley normalise the velvet. The ceciley legitimise the gavin. The ceciley bustle the velvet. The gavin is weaponed. The gavin normalise the ceciley. The gavin normalise the velvet. The gavin legitimise the velvet. The gavin bustle the ceciley. The gavin bustle the velvet. The velvet is staid. The velvet normalise the ceciley. The velvet bustle the ceciley. The velvet bustle the gavin. If something bustle the gavin then it normalise the velvet. Young things are staid. If something is needless and it bustle the ceciley then the ceciley normalise the velvet. If something normalise the gavin then it is needless. If something bustle the velvet and it is weaponed then it normalise the gavin. If something is weaponed and it bustle the gavin then it normalise the ceciley. The ceciley does not like the velvet.", "logic": "\nNeedless(ceciley)\nPseudo(ceciley)\nNormalise(ceciley, gavin)\nNormalise(ceciley, velvet)\nLegitimise(ceciley, gavin)\nBustle(ceciley, velvet)\nWeaponed(gavin)\nNormalise(gavin, ceciley)\nNormalise(gavin, velvet)\nLegitimise(gavin, velvet)\nBustle(gavin, ceciley)\nBustle(gavin, velvet)\nStaid(velvet)\nNormalise(velvet, ceciley)\nBustle(velvet, ceciley)\nBustle(velvet, gavin)\nforall x (Bustle(x, gavin) -> Normalise(x, velvet))\nforall x (Pseudo(x) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Needless(x) and Bustle(x, ceciley) -> Normalise(ceciley, velvet))\nforall x (Normalise(x, gavin) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Bustle(x, velvet) and Weaponed(x) -> Normalise(x, gavin))\nforall x (Weaponed(x) and Bustle(x, gavin) -> Normalise(x, ceciley))\n\nnot Normalise(ceciley, velvet)\n\ntherefore Normalise(ceciley, velvet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "The elmer is extrovert. The elmer is forested. The elmer reclassify the bryana. The elmer reclassify the manda. The elmer rankle the bryana. The elmer lacerate the manda. The bryana is cubistic. The bryana reclassify the elmer. The bryana reclassify the manda. The bryana rankle the manda. The bryana lacerate the elmer. The bryana lacerate the manda. The manda is lewd. The manda reclassify the elmer. The manda lacerate the elmer. The manda lacerate the bryana. If something lacerate the bryana then it reclassify the manda. Young things are lewd. If something is extrovert and it lacerate the elmer then the elmer reclassify the manda. If something reclassify the bryana then it is extrovert. If something lacerate the manda and it is cubistic then it reclassify the bryana. If something is cubistic and it lacerate the bryana then it reclassify the elmer. The bryana reclassify the bryana.", "logic": "\nExtrovert(elmer)\nForested(elmer)\nReclassify(elmer, bryana)\nReclassify(elmer, manda)\nRankle(elmer, bryana)\nLacerate(elmer, manda)\nCubistic(bryana)\nReclassify(bryana, elmer)\nReclassify(bryana, manda)\nRankle(bryana, manda)\nLacerate(bryana, elmer)\nLacerate(bryana, manda)\nLewd(manda)\nReclassify(manda, elmer)\nLacerate(manda, elmer)\nLacerate(manda, bryana)\nforall x (Lacerate(x, bryana) -> Reclassify(x, manda))\nforall x (Forested(x) -> Lewd(x))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) and Lacerate(x, elmer) -> Reclassify(elmer, manda))\nforall x (Reclassify(x, bryana) -> Extrovert(x))\nforall x (Lacerate(x, manda) and Cubistic(x) -> Reclassify(x, bryana))\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Lacerate(x, bryana) -> Reclassify(x, elmer))\n\nReclassify(bryana, bryana)\n\nLacerate(bryana, manda) and Cubistic(bryana) and forall x (Lacerate(x, manda) and Cubistic(x) -> Reclassify(x, bryana)) -> therefore Reclassify(bryana, bryana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "The celestyn is overaged. The celestyn is cornered. The celestyn instrument the latia. The celestyn instrument the belle. The celestyn invert the latia. The celestyn purport the belle. The latia is sickening. The latia instrument the celestyn. The latia instrument the belle. The latia invert the belle. The latia purport the celestyn. The latia purport the belle. The belle is capitalist. The belle instrument the celestyn. The belle purport the celestyn. The belle purport the latia. If something purport the latia then it instrument the belle. Young things are capitalist. If something is overaged and it purport the celestyn then the celestyn instrument the belle. If something instrument the latia then it is overaged. If something purport the belle and it is sickening then it instrument the latia. If something is sickening and it purport the latia then it instrument the celestyn. The latia does not like the latia.", "logic": "\nOveraged(celestyn)\nCornered(celestyn)\nInstrument(celestyn, latia)\nInstrument(celestyn, belle)\nInvert(celestyn, latia)\nPurport(celestyn, belle)\nSickening(latia)\nInstrument(latia, celestyn)\nInstrument(latia, belle)\nInvert(latia, belle)\nPurport(latia, celestyn)\nPurport(latia, belle)\nCapitalist(belle)\nInstrument(belle, celestyn)\nPurport(belle, celestyn)\nPurport(belle, latia)\nforall x (Purport(x, latia) -> Instrument(x, belle))\nforall x (Cornered(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Overaged(x) and Purport(x, celestyn) -> Instrument(celestyn, belle))\nforall x (Instrument(x, latia) -> Overaged(x))\nforall x (Purport(x, belle) and Sickening(x) -> Instrument(x, latia))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Purport(x, latia) -> Instrument(x, celestyn))\n\nnot Instrument(latia, latia)\n\nPurport(latia, belle) and Sickening(latia) and forall x (Purport(x, belle) and Sickening(x) -> Instrument(x, latia)) -> therefore Instrument(latia, latia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "The julieta is pleochroic. The julieta is oaken. The julieta lucubrate the catherina. The julieta lucubrate the maddalena. The julieta remarry the catherina. The julieta contend the maddalena. The catherina is lipophilic. The catherina lucubrate the julieta. The catherina lucubrate the maddalena. The catherina remarry the maddalena. The catherina contend the julieta. The catherina contend the maddalena. The maddalena is fiscal. The maddalena lucubrate the julieta. The maddalena contend the julieta. The maddalena contend the catherina. If something contend the catherina then it lucubrate the maddalena. Young things are fiscal. If something is pleochroic and it contend the julieta then the julieta lucubrate the maddalena. If something lucubrate the catherina then it is pleochroic. If something contend the maddalena and it is lipophilic then it lucubrate the catherina. If something is lipophilic and it contend the catherina then it lucubrate the julieta. The maddalena is not pleochroic.", "logic": "\nPleochroic(julieta)\nOaken(julieta)\nLucubrate(julieta, catherina)\nLucubrate(julieta, maddalena)\nRemarry(julieta, catherina)\nContend(julieta, maddalena)\nLipophilic(catherina)\nLucubrate(catherina, julieta)\nLucubrate(catherina, maddalena)\nRemarry(catherina, maddalena)\nContend(catherina, julieta)\nContend(catherina, maddalena)\nFiscal(maddalena)\nLucubrate(maddalena, julieta)\nContend(maddalena, julieta)\nContend(maddalena, catherina)\nforall x (Contend(x, catherina) -> Lucubrate(x, maddalena))\nforall x (Oaken(x) -> Fiscal(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Contend(x, julieta) -> Lucubrate(julieta, maddalena))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, catherina) -> Pleochroic(x))\nforall x (Contend(x, maddalena) and Lipophilic(x) -> Lucubrate(x, catherina))\nforall x (Lipophilic(x) and Contend(x, catherina) -> Lucubrate(x, julieta))\n\nnot Pleochroic(maddalena)\n\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, catherina) -> Pleochroic(x)) <- forall x (Contend(x, maddalena) and Lipophilic(x) -> Lucubrate(x, catherina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "The chrystal is gallant. The chrystal is cuboid. The chrystal meddle the marit. The chrystal meddle the sharna. The chrystal spin the marit. The chrystal constipate the sharna. The marit is strep. The marit meddle the chrystal. The marit meddle the sharna. The marit spin the sharna. The marit constipate the chrystal. The marit constipate the sharna. The sharna is gratified. The sharna meddle the chrystal. The sharna constipate the chrystal. The sharna constipate the marit. If something constipate the marit then it meddle the sharna. Young things are gratified. If something is gallant and it constipate the chrystal then the chrystal meddle the sharna. If something meddle the marit then it is gallant. If something constipate the sharna and it is strep then it meddle the marit. If something is strep and it constipate the marit then it meddle the chrystal. The marit is gratified.", "logic": "\nGallant(chrystal)\nCuboid(chrystal)\nMeddle(chrystal, marit)\nMeddle(chrystal, sharna)\nSpin(chrystal, marit)\nConstipate(chrystal, sharna)\nStrep(marit)\nMeddle(marit, chrystal)\nMeddle(marit, sharna)\nSpin(marit, sharna)\nConstipate(marit, chrystal)\nConstipate(marit, sharna)\nGratified(sharna)\nMeddle(sharna, chrystal)\nConstipate(sharna, chrystal)\nConstipate(sharna, marit)\nforall x (Constipate(x, marit) -> Meddle(x, sharna))\nforall x (Cuboid(x) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Constipate(x, chrystal) -> Meddle(chrystal, sharna))\nforall x (Meddle(x, marit) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Constipate(x, sharna) and Strep(x) -> Meddle(x, marit))\nforall x (Strep(x) and Constipate(x, marit) -> Meddle(x, chrystal))\n\nGratified(marit)\n\nforall x (Cuboid(x) -> Gratified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "The rufe is actual. The rufe is stonelike. The rufe skin the ranee. The rufe skin the ethan. The rufe thump the ranee. The rufe odorize the ethan. The ranee is cherished. The ranee skin the rufe. The ranee skin the ethan. The ranee thump the ethan. The ranee odorize the rufe. The ranee odorize the ethan. The ethan is dress. The ethan skin the rufe. The ethan odorize the rufe. The ethan odorize the ranee. If something odorize the ranee then it skin the ethan. Young things are dress. If something is actual and it odorize the rufe then the rufe skin the ethan. If something skin the ranee then it is actual. If something odorize the ethan and it is cherished then it skin the ranee. If something is cherished and it odorize the ranee then it skin the rufe. The rufe does not see the ethan.", "logic": "\nActual(rufe)\nStonelike(rufe)\nSkin(rufe, ranee)\nSkin(rufe, ethan)\nThump(rufe, ranee)\nOdorize(rufe, ethan)\nCherished(ranee)\nSkin(ranee, rufe)\nSkin(ranee, ethan)\nThump(ranee, ethan)\nOdorize(ranee, rufe)\nOdorize(ranee, ethan)\nDress(ethan)\nSkin(ethan, rufe)\nOdorize(ethan, rufe)\nOdorize(ethan, ranee)\nforall x (Odorize(x, ranee) -> Skin(x, ethan))\nforall x (Stonelike(x) -> Dress(x))\nforall x (Actual(x) and Odorize(x, rufe) -> Skin(rufe, ethan))\nforall x (Skin(x, ranee) -> Actual(x))\nforall x (Odorize(x, ethan) and Cherished(x) -> Skin(x, ranee))\nforall x (Cherished(x) and Odorize(x, ranee) -> Skin(x, rufe))\n\nnot Thump(rufe, ethan)\n\nnot Thump(rufe, ethan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "The willy is departed. The willy is precarious. The willy stumble the celisse. The willy stumble the maible. The willy clamp the celisse. The willy ally the maible. The celisse is unrevealed. The celisse stumble the willy. The celisse stumble the maible. The celisse clamp the maible. The celisse ally the willy. The celisse ally the maible. The maible is dozen. The maible stumble the willy. The maible ally the willy. The maible ally the celisse. If something ally the celisse then it stumble the maible. Young things are dozen. If something is departed and it ally the willy then the willy stumble the maible. If something stumble the celisse then it is departed. If something ally the maible and it is unrevealed then it stumble the celisse. If something is unrevealed and it ally the celisse then it stumble the willy. The celisse is precarious.", "logic": "\nDeparted(willy)\nPrecarious(willy)\nStumble(willy, celisse)\nStumble(willy, maible)\nClamp(willy, celisse)\nAlly(willy, maible)\nUnrevealed(celisse)\nStumble(celisse, willy)\nStumble(celisse, maible)\nClamp(celisse, maible)\nAlly(celisse, willy)\nAlly(celisse, maible)\nDozen(maible)\nStumble(maible, willy)\nAlly(maible, willy)\nAlly(maible, celisse)\nforall x (Ally(x, celisse) -> Stumble(x, maible))\nforall x (Precarious(x) -> Dozen(x))\nforall x (Departed(x) and Ally(x, willy) -> Stumble(willy, maible))\nforall x (Stumble(x, celisse) -> Departed(x))\nforall x (Ally(x, maible) and Unrevealed(x) -> Stumble(x, celisse))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) and Ally(x, celisse) -> Stumble(x, willy))\n\nPrecarious(celisse)\n\nPrecarious(celisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-729"} {"premises": "Parnell is wrong. Parnell is classified. Ace is postmodern. Ace is reasonless. Thomasine is cursive. Thomasine is classified. Thomasine is reasonless. Bernete is postmodern. Bernete is wrong. Bernete is cursive. Bernete is indirect. Bernete is clubbish. All classified things are postmodern. Thomasine is classified.", "logic": "\nWrong(parnell)\nClassified(parnell)\nPostmodern(ace)\nReasonless(ace)\nCursive(thomasine)\nClassified(thomasine)\nReasonless(thomasine)\nPostmodern(bernete)\nWrong(bernete)\nCursive(bernete)\nIndirect(bernete)\nClubbish(bernete)\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Postmodern(x))\n\nClassified(thomasine)\n\ntherefore Classified(thomasine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Dacy is protanopic. Dacy is meshuga. Hebert is screwball. Hebert is columnar. Madeleine is diaphysial. Madeleine is meshuga. Madeleine is columnar. Alexis is screwball. Alexis is protanopic. Alexis is diaphysial. Alexis is depilous. Alexis is orbiculate. All meshuga things are screwball. Alexis is not protanopic.", "logic": "\nProtanopic(dacy)\nMeshuga(dacy)\nScrewball(hebert)\nColumnar(hebert)\nDiaphysial(madeleine)\nMeshuga(madeleine)\nColumnar(madeleine)\nScrewball(alexis)\nProtanopic(alexis)\nDiaphysial(alexis)\nDepilous(alexis)\nOrbiculate(alexis)\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> Screwball(x))\n\nnot Protanopic(alexis)\n\ntherefore Protanopic(alexis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Glyn is unratable. Glyn is inglorious. Ibbie is terminable. Ibbie is bleary. Ediva is little. Ediva is inglorious. Ediva is bleary. Brian is terminable. Brian is unratable. Brian is little. Brian is correct. Brian is crabby. All inglorious things are terminable. Ediva is terminable.", "logic": "\nUnratable(glyn)\nInglorious(glyn)\nTerminable(ibbie)\nBleary(ibbie)\nLittle(ediva)\nInglorious(ediva)\nBleary(ediva)\nTerminable(brian)\nUnratable(brian)\nLittle(brian)\nCorrect(brian)\nCrabby(brian)\nforall x (Inglorious(x) -> Terminable(x))\n\nTerminable(ediva)\n\nInglorious(ediva) and forall x (Inglorious(x) -> Terminable(x)) -> therefore Terminable(ediva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Ebenezer is obedient. Ebenezer is heavenly. Mommy is resilient. Mommy is aortal. Puff is impressed. Puff is heavenly. Puff is aortal. Storm is resilient. Storm is obedient. Storm is impressed. Storm is syllabled. Storm is slavelike. All heavenly things are resilient. Ebenezer is not resilient.", "logic": "\nObedient(ebenezer)\nHeavenly(ebenezer)\nResilient(mommy)\nAortal(mommy)\nImpressed(puff)\nHeavenly(puff)\nAortal(puff)\nResilient(storm)\nObedient(storm)\nImpressed(storm)\nSyllabled(storm)\nSlavelike(storm)\nforall x (Heavenly(x) -> Resilient(x))\n\nnot Resilient(ebenezer)\n\nHeavenly(ebenezer) and forall x (Heavenly(x) -> Resilient(x)) -> therefore Resilient(ebenezer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Erica is stenosed. Erica is mucinoid. Saraann is dentate. Saraann is texan. May is amphoteric. May is mucinoid. May is texan. Mortimer is dentate. Mortimer is stenosed. Mortimer is amphoteric. Mortimer is dictated. Mortimer is phonemic. All mucinoid things are dentate. Erica is not phonemic.", "logic": "\nStenosed(erica)\nMucinoid(erica)\nDentate(saraann)\nTexan(saraann)\nAmphoteric(may)\nMucinoid(may)\nTexan(may)\nDentate(mortimer)\nStenosed(mortimer)\nAmphoteric(mortimer)\nDictated(mortimer)\nPhonemic(mortimer)\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Dentate(x))\n\nnot Phonemic(erica)\n\nnot Phonemic(erica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Mischa is abiding. Mischa is yellow. Nell is imbecilic. Nell is ulcerative. Tootsie is unplayful. Tootsie is yellow. Tootsie is ulcerative. Lyndel is imbecilic. Lyndel is abiding. Lyndel is unplayful. Lyndel is tsarist. Lyndel is foreboding. All yellow things are imbecilic. Tootsie is abiding.", "logic": "\nAbiding(mischa)\nYellow(mischa)\nImbecilic(nell)\nUlcerative(nell)\nUnplayful(tootsie)\nYellow(tootsie)\nUlcerative(tootsie)\nImbecilic(lyndel)\nAbiding(lyndel)\nUnplayful(lyndel)\nTsarist(lyndel)\nForeboding(lyndel)\nforall x (Yellow(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\n\nAbiding(tootsie)\n\nAbiding(tootsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Kylynn is raucous. Kylynn is cocksure. Bonnee is unfilmed. Bonnee is nodulated. Clinton is amazed. Clinton is cocksure. Clinton is nodulated. Dunc is unfilmed. Dunc is raucous. Dunc is amazed. Dunc is brag. Dunc is drafty. All cocksure things are unfilmed. Dunc is not cocksure.", "logic": "\nRaucous(kylynn)\nCocksure(kylynn)\nUnfilmed(bonnee)\nNodulated(bonnee)\nAmazed(clinton)\nCocksure(clinton)\nNodulated(clinton)\nUnfilmed(dunc)\nRaucous(dunc)\nAmazed(dunc)\nBrag(dunc)\nDrafty(dunc)\nforall x (Cocksure(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\n\nnot Cocksure(dunc)\n\nnot Cocksure(dunc) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Aron is quadruple. Aron is frontal. Hamilton is fettered. Hamilton is aweary. Matthus is unicameral. Matthus is frontal. Matthus is aweary. Lazare is fettered. Lazare is quadruple. Lazare is unicameral. Lazare is audible. Lazare is permeative. All frontal things are fettered. Aron is audible.", "logic": "\nQuadruple(aron)\nFrontal(aron)\nFettered(hamilton)\nAweary(hamilton)\nUnicameral(matthus)\nFrontal(matthus)\nAweary(matthus)\nFettered(lazare)\nQuadruple(lazare)\nUnicameral(lazare)\nAudible(lazare)\nPermeative(lazare)\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> Fettered(x))\n\nAudible(aron)\n\nAudible(aron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-91"} {"premises": "Arianne is dioestrous. Arianne is soppy. Arianne is obtainable. Cher is enate. Cher is obtainable. Ginevra is soppy. Ginevra is earlyish. All soppy, wonderful people are enate. If Cher is obtainable and Cher is enate then Cher is earlyish. If someone is spare and soppy then they are obtainable. Arianne is obtainable.", "logic": "\nDioestrous(arianne)\nSoppy(arianne)\nObtainable(arianne)\nEnate(cher)\nObtainable(cher)\nSoppy(ginevra)\nEarlyish(ginevra)\nforall x (Soppy(x) and Wonderful(x) -> Enate(x))\nObtainable(cher) and Enate(cher) -> Earlyish(cher)\nforall x (Spare(x) and Soppy(x) -> Obtainable(x))\n\nObtainable(arianne)\n\ntherefore Obtainable(arianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-567"} {"premises": "Perl is aggravated. Perl is radiopaque. Perl is homelike. Niven is rambling. Niven is homelike. Clary is radiopaque. Clary is sexed. All radiopaque, reductive people are rambling. If Niven is homelike and Niven is rambling then Niven is sexed. If someone is unscalable and radiopaque then they are homelike. Clary is not sexed.", "logic": "\nAggravated(perl)\nRadiopaque(perl)\nHomelike(perl)\nRambling(niven)\nHomelike(niven)\nRadiopaque(clary)\nSexed(clary)\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) and Reductive(x) -> Rambling(x))\nHomelike(niven) and Rambling(niven) -> Sexed(niven)\nforall x (Unscalable(x) and Radiopaque(x) -> Homelike(x))\n\nnot Sexed(clary)\n\ntherefore Sexed(clary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-567"} {"premises": "Neila is travelable. Neila is needy. Neila is reliant. Truda is wispy. Truda is reliant. Niles is needy. Niles is needful. All needy, chaetal people are wispy. If Truda is reliant and Truda is wispy then Truda is needful. If someone is thenar and needy then they are reliant. Neila is not wispy.", "logic": "\nTravelable(neila)\nNeedy(neila)\nReliant(neila)\nWispy(truda)\nReliant(truda)\nNeedy(niles)\nNeedful(niles)\nforall x (Needy(x) and Chaetal(x) -> Wispy(x))\nReliant(truda) and Wispy(truda) -> Needful(truda)\nforall x (Thenar(x) and Needy(x) -> Reliant(x))\n\nnot Wispy(neila)\n\nforall x (Needy(x) and Chaetal(x) -> Wispy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-567"} {"premises": "Daile is tympanitic. Daile is cacodylic. Daile is colour. Winna is well. Winna is colour. Gerianne is cacodylic. Gerianne is tendinous. All cacodylic, balky people are well. If Winna is colour and Winna is well then Winna is tendinous. If someone is sacred and cacodylic then they are colour. Winna is tympanitic.", "logic": "\nTympanitic(daile)\nCacodylic(daile)\nColour(daile)\nWell(winna)\nColour(winna)\nCacodylic(gerianne)\nTendinous(gerianne)\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and Balky(x) -> Well(x))\nColour(winna) and Well(winna) -> Tendinous(winna)\nforall x (Sacred(x) and Cacodylic(x) -> Colour(x))\n\nTympanitic(winna)\n\nTympanitic(winna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-567"} {"premises": "Delly is tanned. Delly is sabine. Delly is corporal. Delly is coaxial. Delly is fortunate. Clive is tanned. Marci is corporal. Edeline is tanned. Edeline is adolescent. Edeline is sabine. Edeline is secret. Edeline is coaxial. All tanned people are secret. Rough, sabine people are corporal. All corporal people are tanned. If someone is tanned and coaxial then they are sabine. All adolescent, tanned people are coaxial. If someone is tanned and corporal then they are adolescent. Delly is fortunate.", "logic": "\nTanned(delly)\nSabine(delly)\nCorporal(delly)\nCoaxial(delly)\nFortunate(delly)\nTanned(clive)\nCorporal(marci)\nTanned(edeline)\nAdolescent(edeline)\nSabine(edeline)\nSecret(edeline)\nCoaxial(edeline)\nforall x (Tanned(x) -> Secret(x))\nforall x (Secret(x) and Sabine(x) -> Corporal(x))\nforall x (Corporal(x) -> Tanned(x))\nforall x (Tanned(x) and Coaxial(x) -> Sabine(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) and Tanned(x) -> Coaxial(x))\nforall x (Tanned(x) and Corporal(x) -> Adolescent(x))\n\nFortunate(delly)\n\ntherefore Fortunate(delly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Lorry is arboriform. Lorry is cruciate. Lorry is miniscule. Lorry is periodic. Lorry is stylized. Cain is arboriform. Waly is miniscule. Salmon is arboriform. Salmon is bellicose. Salmon is cruciate. Salmon is flimsy. Salmon is periodic. All arboriform people are flimsy. Rough, cruciate people are miniscule. All miniscule people are arboriform. If someone is arboriform and periodic then they are cruciate. All bellicose, arboriform people are periodic. If someone is arboriform and miniscule then they are bellicose. Salmon is not flimsy.", "logic": "\nArboriform(lorry)\nCruciate(lorry)\nMiniscule(lorry)\nPeriodic(lorry)\nStylized(lorry)\nArboriform(cain)\nMiniscule(waly)\nArboriform(salmon)\nBellicose(salmon)\nCruciate(salmon)\nFlimsy(salmon)\nPeriodic(salmon)\nforall x (Arboriform(x) -> Flimsy(x))\nforall x (Flimsy(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nforall x (Miniscule(x) -> Arboriform(x))\nforall x (Arboriform(x) and Periodic(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) and Arboriform(x) -> Periodic(x))\nforall x (Arboriform(x) and Miniscule(x) -> Bellicose(x))\n\nnot Flimsy(salmon)\n\ntherefore Flimsy(salmon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Suzetta is menstrual. Suzetta is austral. Suzetta is geodesic. Suzetta is reasoning. Suzetta is encircled. Serene is menstrual. Marlane is geodesic. Leeanne is menstrual. Leeanne is pickled. Leeanne is austral. Leeanne is exact. Leeanne is reasoning. All menstrual people are exact. Rough, austral people are geodesic. All geodesic people are menstrual. If someone is menstrual and reasoning then they are austral. All pickled, menstrual people are reasoning. If someone is menstrual and geodesic then they are pickled. Leeanne is geodesic.", "logic": "\nMenstrual(suzetta)\nAustral(suzetta)\nGeodesic(suzetta)\nReasoning(suzetta)\nEncircled(suzetta)\nMenstrual(serene)\nGeodesic(marlane)\nMenstrual(leeanne)\nPickled(leeanne)\nAustral(leeanne)\nExact(leeanne)\nReasoning(leeanne)\nforall x (Menstrual(x) -> Exact(x))\nforall x (Exact(x) and Austral(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nforall x (Menstrual(x) and Reasoning(x) -> Austral(x))\nforall x (Pickled(x) and Menstrual(x) -> Reasoning(x))\nforall x (Menstrual(x) and Geodesic(x) -> Pickled(x))\n\nGeodesic(leeanne)\n\nExact(leeanne) and Austral(leeanne) and forall x (Exact(x) and Austral(x) -> Geodesic(x)) -> therefore Geodesic(leeanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Derrol is forehanded. Derrol is patented. Derrol is phallic. Derrol is stinky. Derrol is ungenerous. Coriss is forehanded. Gilburt is phallic. Jenny is forehanded. Jenny is faint. Jenny is patented. Jenny is seaborne. Jenny is stinky. All forehanded people are seaborne. Rough, patented people are phallic. All phallic people are forehanded. If someone is forehanded and stinky then they are patented. All faint, forehanded people are stinky. If someone is forehanded and phallic then they are faint. Coriss is not seaborne.", "logic": "\nForehanded(derrol)\nPatented(derrol)\nPhallic(derrol)\nStinky(derrol)\nUngenerous(derrol)\nForehanded(coriss)\nPhallic(gilburt)\nForehanded(jenny)\nFaint(jenny)\nPatented(jenny)\nSeaborne(jenny)\nStinky(jenny)\nforall x (Forehanded(x) -> Seaborne(x))\nforall x (Seaborne(x) and Patented(x) -> Phallic(x))\nforall x (Phallic(x) -> Forehanded(x))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Stinky(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and Forehanded(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Phallic(x) -> Faint(x))\n\nnot Seaborne(coriss)\n\nForehanded(coriss) and forall x (Forehanded(x) -> Seaborne(x)) -> therefore Seaborne(coriss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Delphina is interior. Delphina is jumbo. Delphina is documented. Delphina is texan. Delphina is misbranded. Kathye is interior. Adelle is documented. Lynn is interior. Lynn is abroad. Lynn is jumbo. Lynn is caroline. Lynn is texan. All interior people are caroline. Rough, jumbo people are documented. All documented people are interior. If someone is interior and texan then they are jumbo. All abroad, interior people are texan. If someone is interior and documented then they are abroad. Adelle is caroline.", "logic": "\nInterior(delphina)\nJumbo(delphina)\nDocumented(delphina)\nTexan(delphina)\nMisbranded(delphina)\nInterior(kathye)\nDocumented(adelle)\nInterior(lynn)\nAbroad(lynn)\nJumbo(lynn)\nCaroline(lynn)\nTexan(lynn)\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Caroline(x))\nforall x (Caroline(x) and Jumbo(x) -> Documented(x))\nforall x (Documented(x) -> Interior(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and Texan(x) -> Jumbo(x))\nforall x (Abroad(x) and Interior(x) -> Texan(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and Documented(x) -> Abroad(x))\n\nCaroline(adelle)\n\nDocumented(adelle) and forall x (Documented(x) -> Interior(x)) -> therefore Interior(adelle) Interior(adelle) and forall x (Interior(x) -> Caroline(x)) -> therefore Caroline(adelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Leticia is nauseous. Leticia is reverend. Leticia is geological. Leticia is fogged. Leticia is maximising. Skip is nauseous. Darla is geological. Manish is nauseous. Manish is suborbital. Manish is reverend. Manish is denatured. Manish is fogged. All nauseous people are denatured. Rough, reverend people are geological. All geological people are nauseous. If someone is nauseous and fogged then they are reverend. All suborbital, nauseous people are fogged. If someone is nauseous and geological then they are suborbital. Darla is not denatured.", "logic": "\nNauseous(leticia)\nReverend(leticia)\nGeological(leticia)\nFogged(leticia)\nMaximising(leticia)\nNauseous(skip)\nGeological(darla)\nNauseous(manish)\nSuborbital(manish)\nReverend(manish)\nDenatured(manish)\nFogged(manish)\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Denatured(x))\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Reverend(x) -> Geological(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) -> Nauseous(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) and Fogged(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Suborbital(x) and Nauseous(x) -> Fogged(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) and Geological(x) -> Suborbital(x))\n\nnot Denatured(darla)\n\nGeological(darla) and forall x (Geological(x) -> Nauseous(x)) -> therefore Nauseous(darla) Nauseous(darla) and forall x (Nauseous(x) -> Denatured(x)) -> therefore Denatured(darla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Enrique is corbelled. Enrique is identical. Enrique is aggregated. Enrique is directive. Enrique is dysphoric. Reese is corbelled. Essie is aggregated. Consuelo is corbelled. Consuelo is shifting. Consuelo is identical. Consuelo is enthralled. Consuelo is directive. All corbelled people are enthralled. Rough, identical people are aggregated. All aggregated people are corbelled. If someone is corbelled and directive then they are identical. All shifting, corbelled people are directive. If someone is corbelled and aggregated then they are shifting. Essie is directive.", "logic": "\nCorbelled(enrique)\nIdentical(enrique)\nAggregated(enrique)\nDirective(enrique)\nDysphoric(enrique)\nCorbelled(reese)\nAggregated(essie)\nCorbelled(consuelo)\nShifting(consuelo)\nIdentical(consuelo)\nEnthralled(consuelo)\nDirective(consuelo)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Enthralled(x) and Identical(x) -> Aggregated(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) and Directive(x) -> Identical(x))\nforall x (Shifting(x) and Corbelled(x) -> Directive(x))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) and Aggregated(x) -> Shifting(x))\n\nDirective(essie)\n\nAggregated(essie) and forall x (Aggregated(x) -> Corbelled(x)) -> therefore Corbelled(essie) Corbelled(essie) and Aggregated(essie) and forall x (Corbelled(x) and Aggregated(x) -> Shifting(x)) -> therefore Shifting(essie) Aggregated(essie) and forall x (Aggregated(x) -> Corbelled(x)) -> therefore Corbelled(essie) Shifting(essie) and Corbelled(essie) and forall x (Shifting(x) and Corbelled(x) -> Directive(x)) -> therefore Directive(essie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Mallory is bellying. Mallory is childless. Mallory is seething. Mallory is scrabbly. Mallory is sexual. Helaine is bellying. Mauritz is seething. Alister is bellying. Alister is askant. Alister is childless. Alister is obscure. Alister is scrabbly. All bellying people are obscure. Rough, childless people are seething. All seething people are bellying. If someone is bellying and scrabbly then they are childless. All askant, bellying people are scrabbly. If someone is bellying and seething then they are askant. Mauritz is not scrabbly.", "logic": "\nBellying(mallory)\nChildless(mallory)\nSeething(mallory)\nScrabbly(mallory)\nSexual(mallory)\nBellying(helaine)\nSeething(mauritz)\nBellying(alister)\nAskant(alister)\nChildless(alister)\nObscure(alister)\nScrabbly(alister)\nforall x (Bellying(x) -> Obscure(x))\nforall x (Obscure(x) and Childless(x) -> Seething(x))\nforall x (Seething(x) -> Bellying(x))\nforall x (Bellying(x) and Scrabbly(x) -> Childless(x))\nforall x (Askant(x) and Bellying(x) -> Scrabbly(x))\nforall x (Bellying(x) and Seething(x) -> Askant(x))\n\nnot Scrabbly(mauritz)\n\nSeething(mauritz) and forall x (Seething(x) -> Bellying(x)) -> therefore Bellying(mauritz) Bellying(mauritz) and Seething(mauritz) and forall x (Bellying(x) and Seething(x) -> Askant(x)) -> therefore Askant(mauritz) Seething(mauritz) and forall x (Seething(x) -> Bellying(x)) -> therefore Bellying(mauritz) Askant(mauritz) and Bellying(mauritz) and forall x (Askant(x) and Bellying(x) -> Scrabbly(x)) -> therefore Scrabbly(mauritz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Melli is roughish. Melli is folding. Melli is resolvable. Melli is smoky. Melli is sparing. Raynell is roughish. Mart is resolvable. Finn is roughish. Finn is gnarled. Finn is folding. Finn is matched. Finn is smoky. All roughish people are matched. Rough, folding people are resolvable. All resolvable people are roughish. If someone is roughish and smoky then they are folding. All gnarled, roughish people are smoky. If someone is roughish and resolvable then they are gnarled. Raynell is not folding.", "logic": "\nRoughish(melli)\nFolding(melli)\nResolvable(melli)\nSmoky(melli)\nSparing(melli)\nRoughish(raynell)\nResolvable(mart)\nRoughish(finn)\nGnarled(finn)\nFolding(finn)\nMatched(finn)\nSmoky(finn)\nforall x (Roughish(x) -> Matched(x))\nforall x (Matched(x) and Folding(x) -> Resolvable(x))\nforall x (Resolvable(x) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Roughish(x) and Smoky(x) -> Folding(x))\nforall x (Gnarled(x) and Roughish(x) -> Smoky(x))\nforall x (Roughish(x) and Resolvable(x) -> Gnarled(x))\n\nnot Folding(raynell)\n\nforall x (Roughish(x) and Smoky(x) -> Folding(x)) <- forall x (Gnarled(x) and Roughish(x) -> Smoky(x)) <- forall x (Roughish(x) and Resolvable(x) -> Gnarled(x)) <- forall x (Matched(x) and Folding(x) -> Resolvable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Cammie is such. Cammie is vitalizing. Cammie is condign. Cammie is toneless. Cammie is polygynous. Timmy is such. Hattie is condign. Rycca is such. Rycca is fecund. Rycca is vitalizing. Rycca is latticed. Rycca is toneless. All such people are latticed. Rough, vitalizing people are condign. All condign people are such. If someone is such and toneless then they are vitalizing. All fecund, such people are toneless. If someone is such and condign then they are fecund. Timmy is condign.", "logic": "\nSuch(cammie)\nVitalizing(cammie)\nCondign(cammie)\nToneless(cammie)\nPolygynous(cammie)\nSuch(timmy)\nCondign(hattie)\nSuch(rycca)\nFecund(rycca)\nVitalizing(rycca)\nLatticed(rycca)\nToneless(rycca)\nforall x (Such(x) -> Latticed(x))\nforall x (Latticed(x) and Vitalizing(x) -> Condign(x))\nforall x (Condign(x) -> Such(x))\nforall x (Such(x) and Toneless(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Fecund(x) and Such(x) -> Toneless(x))\nforall x (Such(x) and Condign(x) -> Fecund(x))\n\nCondign(timmy)\n\nforall x (Latticed(x) and Vitalizing(x) -> Condign(x)) <- forall x (Such(x) and Toneless(x) -> Vitalizing(x)) <- forall x (Fecund(x) and Such(x) -> Toneless(x)) <- forall x (Such(x) and Condign(x) -> Fecund(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Lucretia is gimbaled. Lucretia is bituminous. Lucretia is garlicky. Lucretia is resiny. Lucretia is resettled. Hilliard is gimbaled. Win is garlicky. Anabella is gimbaled. Anabella is frangible. Anabella is bituminous. Anabella is aldehydic. Anabella is resiny. All gimbaled people are aldehydic. Rough, bituminous people are garlicky. All garlicky people are gimbaled. If someone is gimbaled and resiny then they are bituminous. All frangible, gimbaled people are resiny. If someone is gimbaled and garlicky then they are frangible. Hilliard is not resiny.", "logic": "\nGimbaled(lucretia)\nBituminous(lucretia)\nGarlicky(lucretia)\nResiny(lucretia)\nResettled(lucretia)\nGimbaled(hilliard)\nGarlicky(win)\nGimbaled(anabella)\nFrangible(anabella)\nBituminous(anabella)\nAldehydic(anabella)\nResiny(anabella)\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) -> Aldehydic(x))\nforall x (Aldehydic(x) and Bituminous(x) -> Garlicky(x))\nforall x (Garlicky(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) and Resiny(x) -> Bituminous(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) and Gimbaled(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) and Garlicky(x) -> Frangible(x))\n\nnot Resiny(hilliard)\n\nforall x (Frangible(x) and Gimbaled(x) -> Resiny(x)) <- forall x (Gimbaled(x) and Garlicky(x) -> Frangible(x)) <- forall x (Aldehydic(x) and Bituminous(x) -> Garlicky(x)) <- forall x (Gimbaled(x) and Resiny(x) -> Bituminous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Hannie is duckbill. Hannie is unbent. Hannie is hepatic. Hannie is acting. Hannie is emended. Saree is duckbill. Devonna is hepatic. Garvey is duckbill. Garvey is dank. Garvey is unbent. Garvey is otherwise. Garvey is acting. All duckbill people are otherwise. Rough, unbent people are hepatic. All hepatic people are duckbill. If someone is duckbill and acting then they are unbent. All dank, duckbill people are acting. If someone is duckbill and hepatic then they are dank. Saree is dank.", "logic": "\nDuckbill(hannie)\nUnbent(hannie)\nHepatic(hannie)\nActing(hannie)\nEmended(hannie)\nDuckbill(saree)\nHepatic(devonna)\nDuckbill(garvey)\nDank(garvey)\nUnbent(garvey)\nOtherwise(garvey)\nActing(garvey)\nforall x (Duckbill(x) -> Otherwise(x))\nforall x (Otherwise(x) and Unbent(x) -> Hepatic(x))\nforall x (Hepatic(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Acting(x) -> Unbent(x))\nforall x (Dank(x) and Duckbill(x) -> Acting(x))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Hepatic(x) -> Dank(x))\n\nDank(saree)\n\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Hepatic(x) -> Dank(x)) <- forall x (Otherwise(x) and Unbent(x) -> Hepatic(x)) <- forall x (Duckbill(x) and Acting(x) -> Unbent(x)) <- forall x (Dank(x) and Duckbill(x) -> Acting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Sanderson is fearless. Sanderson is scandent. Sanderson is hoary. Sanderson is large. Sanderson is undramatic. Harvey is fearless. Josephus is hoary. Almeda is fearless. Almeda is orwellian. Almeda is scandent. Almeda is untoasted. Almeda is large. All fearless people are untoasted. Rough, scandent people are hoary. All hoary people are fearless. If someone is fearless and large then they are scandent. All orwellian, fearless people are large. If someone is fearless and hoary then they are orwellian. Josephus is not undramatic.", "logic": "\nFearless(sanderson)\nScandent(sanderson)\nHoary(sanderson)\nLarge(sanderson)\nUndramatic(sanderson)\nFearless(harvey)\nHoary(josephus)\nFearless(almeda)\nOrwellian(almeda)\nScandent(almeda)\nUntoasted(almeda)\nLarge(almeda)\nforall x (Fearless(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) and Scandent(x) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Hoary(x) -> Fearless(x))\nforall x (Fearless(x) and Large(x) -> Scandent(x))\nforall x (Orwellian(x) and Fearless(x) -> Large(x))\nforall x (Fearless(x) and Hoary(x) -> Orwellian(x))\n\nnot Undramatic(josephus)\n\nnot Undramatic(josephus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Noellyn is linguistic. Noellyn is alkalic. Noellyn is four. Noellyn is ethnical. Noellyn is dismantled. Malka is linguistic. Sybilla is four. Malina is linguistic. Malina is alliaceous. Malina is alkalic. Malina is clarion. Malina is ethnical. All linguistic people are clarion. Rough, alkalic people are four. All four people are linguistic. If someone is linguistic and ethnical then they are alkalic. All alliaceous, linguistic people are ethnical. If someone is linguistic and four then they are alliaceous. Malka is dismantled.", "logic": "\nLinguistic(noellyn)\nAlkalic(noellyn)\nFour(noellyn)\nEthnical(noellyn)\nDismantled(noellyn)\nLinguistic(malka)\nFour(sybilla)\nLinguistic(malina)\nAlliaceous(malina)\nAlkalic(malina)\nClarion(malina)\nEthnical(malina)\nforall x (Linguistic(x) -> Clarion(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and Alkalic(x) -> Four(x))\nforall x (Four(x) -> Linguistic(x))\nforall x (Linguistic(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Alkalic(x))\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) and Linguistic(x) -> Ethnical(x))\nforall x (Linguistic(x) and Four(x) -> Alliaceous(x))\n\nDismantled(malka)\n\nDismantled(malka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-209"} {"premises": "Cathleen is undried. Cathleen is caucasian. Cathleen is arced. Cathleen is leadless. Cathleen is fusiform. Cathleen is vitrified. Corissa is unmanned. Corissa is caucasian. Corissa is fusiform. Vernen is not unmanned. Vernen is undried. Vernen is caucasian. Vernen is arced. Vernen is not leadless. Vernen is fusiform. Vernen is vitrified. If someone is fusiform and unmanned then they are undried. If Corissa is fusiform then Corissa is leadless. If Corissa is fusiform and Corissa is leadless then Corissa is unmanned. If Corissa is vitrified then Corissa is not arced. All undried people are vitrified. If someone is fusiform and not undried then they are vitrified. Cathleen is undried.", "logic": "\nUndried(cathleen)\nCaucasian(cathleen)\nArced(cathleen)\nLeadless(cathleen)\nFusiform(cathleen)\nVitrified(cathleen)\nUnmanned(corissa)\nCaucasian(corissa)\nFusiform(corissa)\nnot Unmanned(vernen)\nUndried(vernen)\nCaucasian(vernen)\nArced(vernen)\nnot Leadless(vernen)\nFusiform(vernen)\nVitrified(vernen)\nforall x (Fusiform(x) and Unmanned(x) -> Undried(x))\nFusiform(corissa) -> Leadless(corissa)\nFusiform(corissa) and Leadless(corissa) -> Unmanned(corissa)\nVitrified(corissa) -> not Arced(corissa)\nforall x (Undried(x) -> Vitrified(x))\nforall x (Fusiform(x) and not Undried(x) -> Vitrified(x))\n\nUndried(cathleen)\n\ntherefore Undried(cathleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Ewart is tributary. Ewart is pinnated. Ewart is sceptred. Ewart is appeasable. Ewart is cuprous. Ewart is forbidding. Alic is vocal. Alic is pinnated. Alic is cuprous. Pansie is not vocal. Pansie is tributary. Pansie is pinnated. Pansie is sceptred. Pansie is not appeasable. Pansie is cuprous. Pansie is forbidding. If someone is cuprous and vocal then they are tributary. If Alic is cuprous then Alic is appeasable. If Alic is cuprous and Alic is appeasable then Alic is vocal. If Alic is forbidding then Alic is not sceptred. All tributary people are forbidding. If someone is cuprous and not tributary then they are forbidding. Ewart is not tributary.", "logic": "\nTributary(ewart)\nPinnated(ewart)\nSceptred(ewart)\nAppeasable(ewart)\nCuprous(ewart)\nForbidding(ewart)\nVocal(alic)\nPinnated(alic)\nCuprous(alic)\nnot Vocal(pansie)\nTributary(pansie)\nPinnated(pansie)\nSceptred(pansie)\nnot Appeasable(pansie)\nCuprous(pansie)\nForbidding(pansie)\nforall x (Cuprous(x) and Vocal(x) -> Tributary(x))\nCuprous(alic) -> Appeasable(alic)\nCuprous(alic) and Appeasable(alic) -> Vocal(alic)\nForbidding(alic) -> not Sceptred(alic)\nforall x (Tributary(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Cuprous(x) and not Tributary(x) -> Forbidding(x))\n\nnot Tributary(ewart)\n\ntherefore Tributary(ewart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Rupert is urgent. Rupert is pudendal. Rupert is kindred. Rupert is xvii. Rupert is seminude. Rupert is parthian. Norman is coiling. Norman is pudendal. Norman is seminude. Adrea is not coiling. Adrea is urgent. Adrea is pudendal. Adrea is kindred. Adrea is not xvii. Adrea is seminude. Adrea is parthian. If someone is seminude and coiling then they are urgent. If Norman is seminude then Norman is xvii. If Norman is seminude and Norman is xvii then Norman is coiling. If Norman is parthian then Norman is not kindred. All urgent people are parthian. If someone is seminude and not urgent then they are parthian. Norman is urgent.", "logic": "\nUrgent(rupert)\nPudendal(rupert)\nKindred(rupert)\nXvii(rupert)\nSeminude(rupert)\nParthian(rupert)\nCoiling(norman)\nPudendal(norman)\nSeminude(norman)\nnot Coiling(adrea)\nUrgent(adrea)\nPudendal(adrea)\nKindred(adrea)\nnot Xvii(adrea)\nSeminude(adrea)\nParthian(adrea)\nforall x (Seminude(x) and Coiling(x) -> Urgent(x))\nSeminude(norman) -> Xvii(norman)\nSeminude(norman) and Xvii(norman) -> Coiling(norman)\nParthian(norman) -> not Kindred(norman)\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Parthian(x))\nforall x (Seminude(x) and not Urgent(x) -> Parthian(x))\n\nUrgent(norman)\n\nSeminude(norman) and Coiling(norman) and forall x (Seminude(x) and Coiling(x) -> Urgent(x)) -> therefore Urgent(norman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Heide is valvular. Heide is punitive. Heide is blond. Heide is derived. Heide is reedy. Heide is coastal. Lianna is ominous. Lianna is punitive. Lianna is reedy. Andrej is not ominous. Andrej is valvular. Andrej is punitive. Andrej is blond. Andrej is not derived. Andrej is reedy. Andrej is coastal. If someone is reedy and ominous then they are valvular. If Lianna is reedy then Lianna is derived. If Lianna is reedy and Lianna is derived then Lianna is ominous. If Lianna is coastal then Lianna is not blond. All valvular people are coastal. If someone is reedy and not valvular then they are coastal. Lianna is not derived.", "logic": "\nValvular(heide)\nPunitive(heide)\nBlond(heide)\nDerived(heide)\nReedy(heide)\nCoastal(heide)\nOminous(lianna)\nPunitive(lianna)\nReedy(lianna)\nnot Ominous(andrej)\nValvular(andrej)\nPunitive(andrej)\nBlond(andrej)\nnot Derived(andrej)\nReedy(andrej)\nCoastal(andrej)\nforall x (Reedy(x) and Ominous(x) -> Valvular(x))\nReedy(lianna) -> Derived(lianna)\nReedy(lianna) and Derived(lianna) -> Ominous(lianna)\nCoastal(lianna) -> not Blond(lianna)\nforall x (Valvular(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Reedy(x) and not Valvular(x) -> Coastal(x))\n\nnot Derived(lianna)\n\nReedy(lianna) and Reedy(lianna) -> Derived(lianna) -> therefore Derived(lianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Cindy is slovenly. Cindy is unpleasant. Cindy is kantian. Cindy is unsalable. Cindy is unspoken. Cindy is latino. Koo is possible. Koo is unpleasant. Koo is unspoken. Thom is not possible. Thom is slovenly. Thom is unpleasant. Thom is kantian. Thom is not unsalable. Thom is unspoken. Thom is latino. If someone is unspoken and possible then they are slovenly. If Koo is unspoken then Koo is unsalable. If Koo is unspoken and Koo is unsalable then Koo is possible. If Koo is latino then Koo is not kantian. All slovenly people are latino. If someone is unspoken and not slovenly then they are latino. Koo is latino.", "logic": "\nSlovenly(cindy)\nUnpleasant(cindy)\nKantian(cindy)\nUnsalable(cindy)\nUnspoken(cindy)\nLatino(cindy)\nPossible(koo)\nUnpleasant(koo)\nUnspoken(koo)\nnot Possible(thom)\nSlovenly(thom)\nUnpleasant(thom)\nKantian(thom)\nnot Unsalable(thom)\nUnspoken(thom)\nLatino(thom)\nforall x (Unspoken(x) and Possible(x) -> Slovenly(x))\nUnspoken(koo) -> Unsalable(koo)\nUnspoken(koo) and Unsalable(koo) -> Possible(koo)\nLatino(koo) -> not Kantian(koo)\nforall x (Slovenly(x) -> Latino(x))\nforall x (Unspoken(x) and not Slovenly(x) -> Latino(x))\n\nLatino(koo)\n\nUnspoken(koo) and Possible(koo) and forall x (Unspoken(x) and Possible(x) -> Slovenly(x)) -> therefore Slovenly(koo) Slovenly(koo) and forall x (Slovenly(x) -> Latino(x)) -> therefore Latino(koo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Hephzibah is sepaloid. Hephzibah is edematous. Hephzibah is emphasised. Hephzibah is zygotic. Hephzibah is innumerous. Hephzibah is quavering. Lishe is antlered. Lishe is edematous. Lishe is innumerous. Sancho is not antlered. Sancho is sepaloid. Sancho is edematous. Sancho is emphasised. Sancho is not zygotic. Sancho is innumerous. Sancho is quavering. If someone is innumerous and antlered then they are sepaloid. If Lishe is innumerous then Lishe is zygotic. If Lishe is innumerous and Lishe is zygotic then Lishe is antlered. If Lishe is quavering then Lishe is not emphasised. All sepaloid people are quavering. If someone is innumerous and not sepaloid then they are quavering. Lishe is not quavering.", "logic": "\nSepaloid(hephzibah)\nEdematous(hephzibah)\nEmphasised(hephzibah)\nZygotic(hephzibah)\nInnumerous(hephzibah)\nQuavering(hephzibah)\nAntlered(lishe)\nEdematous(lishe)\nInnumerous(lishe)\nnot Antlered(sancho)\nSepaloid(sancho)\nEdematous(sancho)\nEmphasised(sancho)\nnot Zygotic(sancho)\nInnumerous(sancho)\nQuavering(sancho)\nforall x (Innumerous(x) and Antlered(x) -> Sepaloid(x))\nInnumerous(lishe) -> Zygotic(lishe)\nInnumerous(lishe) and Zygotic(lishe) -> Antlered(lishe)\nQuavering(lishe) -> not Emphasised(lishe)\nforall x (Sepaloid(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Innumerous(x) and not Sepaloid(x) -> Quavering(x))\n\nnot Quavering(lishe)\n\nInnumerous(lishe) and Antlered(lishe) and forall x (Innumerous(x) and Antlered(x) -> Sepaloid(x)) -> therefore Sepaloid(lishe) Sepaloid(lishe) and forall x (Sepaloid(x) -> Quavering(x)) -> therefore Quavering(lishe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Salomo is sedgy. Salomo is staring. Salomo is incoming. Salomo is nonaged. Salomo is thinking. Salomo is buggy. Wilfred is blae. Wilfred is staring. Wilfred is thinking. Velma is not blae. Velma is sedgy. Velma is staring. Velma is incoming. Velma is not nonaged. Velma is thinking. Velma is buggy. If someone is thinking and blae then they are sedgy. If Wilfred is thinking then Wilfred is nonaged. If Wilfred is thinking and Wilfred is nonaged then Wilfred is blae. If Wilfred is buggy then Wilfred is not incoming. All sedgy people are buggy. If someone is thinking and not sedgy then they are buggy. Wilfred is not incoming.", "logic": "\nSedgy(salomo)\nStaring(salomo)\nIncoming(salomo)\nNonaged(salomo)\nThinking(salomo)\nBuggy(salomo)\nBlae(wilfred)\nStaring(wilfred)\nThinking(wilfred)\nnot Blae(velma)\nSedgy(velma)\nStaring(velma)\nIncoming(velma)\nnot Nonaged(velma)\nThinking(velma)\nBuggy(velma)\nforall x (Thinking(x) and Blae(x) -> Sedgy(x))\nThinking(wilfred) -> Nonaged(wilfred)\nThinking(wilfred) and Nonaged(wilfred) -> Blae(wilfred)\nBuggy(wilfred) -> not Incoming(wilfred)\nforall x (Sedgy(x) -> Buggy(x))\nforall x (Thinking(x) and not Sedgy(x) -> Buggy(x))\n\nnot Incoming(wilfred)\n\nThinking(wilfred) and Blae(wilfred) and forall x (Thinking(x) and Blae(x) -> Sedgy(x)) -> therefore Sedgy(wilfred) Sedgy(wilfred) and forall x (Sedgy(x) -> Buggy(x)) -> therefore Buggy(wilfred) Buggy(wilfred) and Buggy(wilfred) -> not Incoming(wilfred) -> therefore not Incoming(wilfred)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Nari is cheating. Nari is lymphatic. Nari is brushed. Nari is exportable. Nari is expected. Nari is unstarred. Jolyn is lunatic. Jolyn is lymphatic. Jolyn is expected. Chris is not lunatic. Chris is cheating. Chris is lymphatic. Chris is brushed. Chris is not exportable. Chris is expected. Chris is unstarred. If someone is expected and lunatic then they are cheating. If Jolyn is expected then Jolyn is exportable. If Jolyn is expected and Jolyn is exportable then Jolyn is lunatic. If Jolyn is unstarred then Jolyn is not brushed. All cheating people are unstarred. If someone is expected and not cheating then they are unstarred. Jolyn is brushed.", "logic": "\nCheating(nari)\nLymphatic(nari)\nBrushed(nari)\nExportable(nari)\nExpected(nari)\nUnstarred(nari)\nLunatic(jolyn)\nLymphatic(jolyn)\nExpected(jolyn)\nnot Lunatic(chris)\nCheating(chris)\nLymphatic(chris)\nBrushed(chris)\nnot Exportable(chris)\nExpected(chris)\nUnstarred(chris)\nforall x (Expected(x) and Lunatic(x) -> Cheating(x))\nExpected(jolyn) -> Exportable(jolyn)\nExpected(jolyn) and Exportable(jolyn) -> Lunatic(jolyn)\nUnstarred(jolyn) -> not Brushed(jolyn)\nforall x (Cheating(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Expected(x) and not Cheating(x) -> Unstarred(x))\n\nBrushed(jolyn)\n\nExpected(jolyn) and Lunatic(jolyn) and forall x (Expected(x) and Lunatic(x) -> Cheating(x)) -> therefore Cheating(jolyn) Cheating(jolyn) and forall x (Cheating(x) -> Unstarred(x)) -> therefore Unstarred(jolyn) Unstarred(jolyn) and Unstarred(jolyn) -> not Brushed(jolyn) -> therefore not Brushed(jolyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Adele is smoothbore. Adele is aesthetic. Adele is not sweptback. Ninette is torn. Ninette is smoothbore. Ninette is unbeatable. Ninette is moraceous. Ninette is sweptback. Sylvie is aesthetic. Sylvie is tenebrious. Rough, tenebrious people are unbeatable. White people are torn. If someone is aesthetic then they are tenebrious. All aesthetic people are smoothbore. If Ninette is aesthetic and Ninette is torn then Ninette is not sweptback. If Adele is aesthetic and Adele is torn then Adele is not moraceous. If Sylvie is tenebrious and Sylvie is sweptback then Sylvie is smoothbore. If someone is aesthetic and not moraceous then they are not sweptback. Sylvie is aesthetic.", "logic": "\nSmoothbore(adele)\nAesthetic(adele)\nnot Sweptback(adele)\nTorn(ninette)\nSmoothbore(ninette)\nUnbeatable(ninette)\nMoraceous(ninette)\nSweptback(ninette)\nAesthetic(sylvie)\nTenebrious(sylvie)\nforall x (Moraceous(x) and Tenebrious(x) -> Unbeatable(x))\nforall x (Tenebrious(x) -> Torn(x))\nforall x (Aesthetic(x) -> Tenebrious(x))\nforall x (Aesthetic(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nAesthetic(ninette) and Torn(ninette) -> not Sweptback(ninette)\nAesthetic(adele) and Torn(adele) -> not Moraceous(adele)\nTenebrious(sylvie) and Sweptback(sylvie) -> Smoothbore(sylvie)\nforall x (Aesthetic(x) and not Moraceous(x) -> not Sweptback(x))\n\nAesthetic(sylvie)\n\ntherefore Aesthetic(sylvie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Quiggly is unbeknown. Quiggly is noncausal. Quiggly is not homophile. Libbey is resurgent. Libbey is unbeknown. Libbey is divine. Libbey is wingless. Libbey is homophile. Charlotte is noncausal. Charlotte is napoleonic. Rough, napoleonic people are divine. White people are resurgent. If someone is noncausal then they are napoleonic. All noncausal people are unbeknown. If Libbey is noncausal and Libbey is resurgent then Libbey is not homophile. If Quiggly is noncausal and Quiggly is resurgent then Quiggly is not wingless. If Charlotte is napoleonic and Charlotte is homophile then Charlotte is unbeknown. If someone is noncausal and not wingless then they are not homophile. Charlotte is not noncausal.", "logic": "\nUnbeknown(quiggly)\nNoncausal(quiggly)\nnot Homophile(quiggly)\nResurgent(libbey)\nUnbeknown(libbey)\nDivine(libbey)\nWingless(libbey)\nHomophile(libbey)\nNoncausal(charlotte)\nNapoleonic(charlotte)\nforall x (Wingless(x) and Napoleonic(x) -> Divine(x))\nforall x (Napoleonic(x) -> Resurgent(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Napoleonic(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Unbeknown(x))\nNoncausal(libbey) and Resurgent(libbey) -> not Homophile(libbey)\nNoncausal(quiggly) and Resurgent(quiggly) -> not Wingless(quiggly)\nNapoleonic(charlotte) and Homophile(charlotte) -> Unbeknown(charlotte)\nforall x (Noncausal(x) and not Wingless(x) -> not Homophile(x))\n\nnot Noncausal(charlotte)\n\ntherefore Noncausal(charlotte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Gian is vulturine. Gian is soulful. Gian is not loose. Aidan is diminuendo. Aidan is vulturine. Aidan is cormose. Aidan is ballistic. Aidan is loose. Patrizia is soulful. Patrizia is bushed. Rough, bushed people are cormose. White people are diminuendo. If someone is soulful then they are bushed. All soulful people are vulturine. If Aidan is soulful and Aidan is diminuendo then Aidan is not loose. If Gian is soulful and Gian is diminuendo then Gian is not ballistic. If Patrizia is bushed and Patrizia is loose then Patrizia is vulturine. If someone is soulful and not ballistic then they are not loose. Patrizia is diminuendo.", "logic": "\nVulturine(gian)\nSoulful(gian)\nnot Loose(gian)\nDiminuendo(aidan)\nVulturine(aidan)\nCormose(aidan)\nBallistic(aidan)\nLoose(aidan)\nSoulful(patrizia)\nBushed(patrizia)\nforall x (Ballistic(x) and Bushed(x) -> Cormose(x))\nforall x (Bushed(x) -> Diminuendo(x))\nforall x (Soulful(x) -> Bushed(x))\nforall x (Soulful(x) -> Vulturine(x))\nSoulful(aidan) and Diminuendo(aidan) -> not Loose(aidan)\nSoulful(gian) and Diminuendo(gian) -> not Ballistic(gian)\nBushed(patrizia) and Loose(patrizia) -> Vulturine(patrizia)\nforall x (Soulful(x) and not Ballistic(x) -> not Loose(x))\n\nDiminuendo(patrizia)\n\nBushed(patrizia) and forall x (Bushed(x) -> Diminuendo(x)) -> therefore Diminuendo(patrizia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Harriott is fatherless. Harriott is numinous. Harriott is not controlled. Nikki is undomestic. Nikki is fatherless. Nikki is ciliate. Nikki is trite. Nikki is controlled. Lennie is numinous. Lennie is emarginate. Rough, emarginate people are ciliate. White people are undomestic. If someone is numinous then they are emarginate. All numinous people are fatherless. If Nikki is numinous and Nikki is undomestic then Nikki is not controlled. If Harriott is numinous and Harriott is undomestic then Harriott is not trite. If Lennie is emarginate and Lennie is controlled then Lennie is fatherless. If someone is numinous and not trite then they are not controlled. Lennie is not undomestic.", "logic": "\nFatherless(harriott)\nNuminous(harriott)\nnot Controlled(harriott)\nUndomestic(nikki)\nFatherless(nikki)\nCiliate(nikki)\nTrite(nikki)\nControlled(nikki)\nNuminous(lennie)\nEmarginate(lennie)\nforall x (Trite(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Ciliate(x))\nforall x (Emarginate(x) -> Undomestic(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> Emarginate(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> Fatherless(x))\nNuminous(nikki) and Undomestic(nikki) -> not Controlled(nikki)\nNuminous(harriott) and Undomestic(harriott) -> not Trite(harriott)\nEmarginate(lennie) and Controlled(lennie) -> Fatherless(lennie)\nforall x (Numinous(x) and not Trite(x) -> not Controlled(x))\n\nnot Undomestic(lennie)\n\nEmarginate(lennie) and forall x (Emarginate(x) -> Undomestic(x)) -> therefore Undomestic(lennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Tome is hawkish. Tome is waspish. Tome is not overgrown. Simonette is sodding. Simonette is hawkish. Simonette is scholastic. Simonette is unnoticed. Simonette is overgrown. Eilis is waspish. Eilis is inward. Rough, inward people are scholastic. White people are sodding. If someone is waspish then they are inward. All waspish people are hawkish. If Simonette is waspish and Simonette is sodding then Simonette is not overgrown. If Tome is waspish and Tome is sodding then Tome is not unnoticed. If Eilis is inward and Eilis is overgrown then Eilis is hawkish. If someone is waspish and not unnoticed then they are not overgrown. Tome is sodding.", "logic": "\nHawkish(tome)\nWaspish(tome)\nnot Overgrown(tome)\nSodding(simonette)\nHawkish(simonette)\nScholastic(simonette)\nUnnoticed(simonette)\nOvergrown(simonette)\nWaspish(eilis)\nInward(eilis)\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) and Inward(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Inward(x) -> Sodding(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> Inward(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> Hawkish(x))\nWaspish(simonette) and Sodding(simonette) -> not Overgrown(simonette)\nWaspish(tome) and Sodding(tome) -> not Unnoticed(tome)\nInward(eilis) and Overgrown(eilis) -> Hawkish(eilis)\nforall x (Waspish(x) and not Unnoticed(x) -> not Overgrown(x))\n\nSodding(tome)\n\nWaspish(tome) and forall x (Waspish(x) -> Inward(x)) -> therefore Inward(tome) Inward(tome) and forall x (Inward(x) -> Sodding(x)) -> therefore Sodding(tome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Blinny is unabridged. Blinny is frosted. Blinny is not redux. August is afrikaans. August is unabridged. August is manageable. August is uncouth. August is redux. Kate is frosted. Kate is wholesale. Rough, wholesale people are manageable. White people are afrikaans. If someone is frosted then they are wholesale. All frosted people are unabridged. If August is frosted and August is afrikaans then August is not redux. If Blinny is frosted and Blinny is afrikaans then Blinny is not uncouth. If Kate is wholesale and Kate is redux then Kate is unabridged. If someone is frosted and not uncouth then they are not redux. Blinny is not afrikaans.", "logic": "\nUnabridged(blinny)\nFrosted(blinny)\nnot Redux(blinny)\nAfrikaans(august)\nUnabridged(august)\nManageable(august)\nUncouth(august)\nRedux(august)\nFrosted(kate)\nWholesale(kate)\nforall x (Uncouth(x) and Wholesale(x) -> Manageable(x))\nforall x (Wholesale(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Frosted(x) -> Wholesale(x))\nforall x (Frosted(x) -> Unabridged(x))\nFrosted(august) and Afrikaans(august) -> not Redux(august)\nFrosted(blinny) and Afrikaans(blinny) -> not Uncouth(blinny)\nWholesale(kate) and Redux(kate) -> Unabridged(kate)\nforall x (Frosted(x) and not Uncouth(x) -> not Redux(x))\n\nnot Afrikaans(blinny)\n\nFrosted(blinny) and forall x (Frosted(x) -> Wholesale(x)) -> therefore Wholesale(blinny) Wholesale(blinny) and forall x (Wholesale(x) -> Afrikaans(x)) -> therefore Afrikaans(blinny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Valentia is silicious. Valentia is blighted. Valentia is not exhaustive. Desirae is decollete. Desirae is silicious. Desirae is evocative. Desirae is xxxiii. Desirae is exhaustive. Lucy is blighted. Lucy is apogean. Rough, apogean people are evocative. White people are decollete. If someone is blighted then they are apogean. All blighted people are silicious. If Desirae is blighted and Desirae is decollete then Desirae is not exhaustive. If Valentia is blighted and Valentia is decollete then Valentia is not xxxiii. If Lucy is apogean and Lucy is exhaustive then Lucy is silicious. If someone is blighted and not xxxiii then they are not exhaustive. Valentia is not xxxiii.", "logic": "\nSilicious(valentia)\nBlighted(valentia)\nnot Exhaustive(valentia)\nDecollete(desirae)\nSilicious(desirae)\nEvocative(desirae)\nXxxiii(desirae)\nExhaustive(desirae)\nBlighted(lucy)\nApogean(lucy)\nforall x (Xxxiii(x) and Apogean(x) -> Evocative(x))\nforall x (Apogean(x) -> Decollete(x))\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Apogean(x))\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Silicious(x))\nBlighted(desirae) and Decollete(desirae) -> not Exhaustive(desirae)\nBlighted(valentia) and Decollete(valentia) -> not Xxxiii(valentia)\nApogean(lucy) and Exhaustive(lucy) -> Silicious(lucy)\nforall x (Blighted(x) and not Xxxiii(x) -> not Exhaustive(x))\n\nnot Xxxiii(valentia)\n\nBlighted(valentia) and forall x (Blighted(x) -> Apogean(x)) -> therefore Apogean(valentia) Apogean(valentia) and forall x (Apogean(x) -> Decollete(x)) -> therefore Decollete(valentia) Blighted(valentia) and Decollete(valentia) and Blighted(valentia) and Decollete(valentia) -> not Xxxiii(valentia) -> therefore not Xxxiii(valentia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Carlynn is apogean. Carlynn is rayless. Carlynn is not arcadian. Jessika is pelagic. Jessika is apogean. Jessika is uppermost. Jessika is recovering. Jessika is arcadian. Odessa is rayless. Odessa is untold. Rough, untold people are uppermost. White people are pelagic. If someone is rayless then they are untold. All rayless people are apogean. If Jessika is rayless and Jessika is pelagic then Jessika is not arcadian. If Carlynn is rayless and Carlynn is pelagic then Carlynn is not recovering. If Odessa is untold and Odessa is arcadian then Odessa is apogean. If someone is rayless and not recovering then they are not arcadian. Carlynn is recovering.", "logic": "\nApogean(carlynn)\nRayless(carlynn)\nnot Arcadian(carlynn)\nPelagic(jessika)\nApogean(jessika)\nUppermost(jessika)\nRecovering(jessika)\nArcadian(jessika)\nRayless(odessa)\nUntold(odessa)\nforall x (Recovering(x) and Untold(x) -> Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Pelagic(x))\nforall x (Rayless(x) -> Untold(x))\nforall x (Rayless(x) -> Apogean(x))\nRayless(jessika) and Pelagic(jessika) -> not Arcadian(jessika)\nRayless(carlynn) and Pelagic(carlynn) -> not Recovering(carlynn)\nUntold(odessa) and Arcadian(odessa) -> Apogean(odessa)\nforall x (Rayless(x) and not Recovering(x) -> not Arcadian(x))\n\nRecovering(carlynn)\n\nRayless(carlynn) and forall x (Rayless(x) -> Untold(x)) -> therefore Untold(carlynn) Untold(carlynn) and forall x (Untold(x) -> Pelagic(x)) -> therefore Pelagic(carlynn) Rayless(carlynn) and Pelagic(carlynn) and Rayless(carlynn) and Pelagic(carlynn) -> not Recovering(carlynn) -> therefore not Recovering(carlynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Izaak is mysterious. Izaak is botched. Izaak is not palmate. Korie is sensible. Korie is mysterious. Korie is reptilian. Korie is shelfy. Korie is palmate. Beverlie is botched. Beverlie is winless. Rough, winless people are reptilian. White people are sensible. If someone is botched then they are winless. All botched people are mysterious. If Korie is botched and Korie is sensible then Korie is not palmate. If Izaak is botched and Izaak is sensible then Izaak is not shelfy. If Beverlie is winless and Beverlie is palmate then Beverlie is mysterious. If someone is botched and not shelfy then they are not palmate. Beverlie is not reptilian.", "logic": "\nMysterious(izaak)\nBotched(izaak)\nnot Palmate(izaak)\nSensible(korie)\nMysterious(korie)\nReptilian(korie)\nShelfy(korie)\nPalmate(korie)\nBotched(beverlie)\nWinless(beverlie)\nforall x (Shelfy(x) and Winless(x) -> Reptilian(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) -> Sensible(x))\nforall x (Botched(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Botched(x) -> Mysterious(x))\nBotched(korie) and Sensible(korie) -> not Palmate(korie)\nBotched(izaak) and Sensible(izaak) -> not Shelfy(izaak)\nWinless(beverlie) and Palmate(beverlie) -> Mysterious(beverlie)\nforall x (Botched(x) and not Shelfy(x) -> not Palmate(x))\n\nnot Reptilian(beverlie)\n\nforall x (Shelfy(x) and Winless(x) -> Reptilian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Eleni is tartaric. Eleni is mousey. Eleni is not parasitic. Dunc is loopy. Dunc is tartaric. Dunc is afloat. Dunc is chagrined. Dunc is parasitic. Fredi is mousey. Fredi is creditable. Rough, creditable people are afloat. White people are loopy. If someone is mousey then they are creditable. All mousey people are tartaric. If Dunc is mousey and Dunc is loopy then Dunc is not parasitic. If Eleni is mousey and Eleni is loopy then Eleni is not chagrined. If Fredi is creditable and Fredi is parasitic then Fredi is tartaric. If someone is mousey and not chagrined then they are not parasitic. Eleni is afloat.", "logic": "\nTartaric(eleni)\nMousey(eleni)\nnot Parasitic(eleni)\nLoopy(dunc)\nTartaric(dunc)\nAfloat(dunc)\nChagrined(dunc)\nParasitic(dunc)\nMousey(fredi)\nCreditable(fredi)\nforall x (Chagrined(x) and Creditable(x) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Creditable(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Creditable(x))\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nMousey(dunc) and Loopy(dunc) -> not Parasitic(dunc)\nMousey(eleni) and Loopy(eleni) -> not Chagrined(eleni)\nCreditable(fredi) and Parasitic(fredi) -> Tartaric(fredi)\nforall x (Mousey(x) and not Chagrined(x) -> not Parasitic(x))\n\nAfloat(eleni)\n\nforall x (Chagrined(x) and Creditable(x) -> Afloat(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Saunder is begrimed. Saunder is betrothed. Saunder is not brainless. Claudia is togolese. Claudia is begrimed. Claudia is haematal. Claudia is pickled. Claudia is brainless. Reiko is betrothed. Reiko is consoling. Rough, consoling people are haematal. White people are togolese. If someone is betrothed then they are consoling. All betrothed people are begrimed. If Claudia is betrothed and Claudia is togolese then Claudia is not brainless. If Saunder is betrothed and Saunder is togolese then Saunder is not pickled. If Reiko is consoling and Reiko is brainless then Reiko is begrimed. If someone is betrothed and not pickled then they are not brainless. Claudia is not consoling.", "logic": "\nBegrimed(saunder)\nBetrothed(saunder)\nnot Brainless(saunder)\nTogolese(claudia)\nBegrimed(claudia)\nHaematal(claudia)\nPickled(claudia)\nBrainless(claudia)\nBetrothed(reiko)\nConsoling(reiko)\nforall x (Pickled(x) and Consoling(x) -> Haematal(x))\nforall x (Consoling(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Consoling(x))\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Begrimed(x))\nBetrothed(claudia) and Togolese(claudia) -> not Brainless(claudia)\nBetrothed(saunder) and Togolese(saunder) -> not Pickled(saunder)\nConsoling(reiko) and Brainless(reiko) -> Begrimed(reiko)\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and not Pickled(x) -> not Brainless(x))\n\nnot Consoling(claudia)\n\nforall x (Betrothed(x) -> Consoling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Adiana is antlered. Adiana is inbred. Adiana is not skilled. Rebeka is bedless. Rebeka is antlered. Rebeka is khaki. Rebeka is faulty. Rebeka is skilled. Lindsey is inbred. Lindsey is homesick. Rough, homesick people are khaki. White people are bedless. If someone is inbred then they are homesick. All inbred people are antlered. If Rebeka is inbred and Rebeka is bedless then Rebeka is not skilled. If Adiana is inbred and Adiana is bedless then Adiana is not faulty. If Lindsey is homesick and Lindsey is skilled then Lindsey is antlered. If someone is inbred and not faulty then they are not skilled. Lindsey is skilled.", "logic": "\nAntlered(adiana)\nInbred(adiana)\nnot Skilled(adiana)\nBedless(rebeka)\nAntlered(rebeka)\nKhaki(rebeka)\nFaulty(rebeka)\nSkilled(rebeka)\nInbred(lindsey)\nHomesick(lindsey)\nforall x (Faulty(x) and Homesick(x) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Bedless(x))\nforall x (Inbred(x) -> Homesick(x))\nforall x (Inbred(x) -> Antlered(x))\nInbred(rebeka) and Bedless(rebeka) -> not Skilled(rebeka)\nInbred(adiana) and Bedless(adiana) -> not Faulty(adiana)\nHomesick(lindsey) and Skilled(lindsey) -> Antlered(lindsey)\nforall x (Inbred(x) and not Faulty(x) -> not Skilled(x))\n\nSkilled(lindsey)\n\nSkilled(lindsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Eada is righteous. Eada is unmarried. Eada is not blaring. Kristal is pemphigous. Kristal is righteous. Kristal is catholic. Kristal is rippled. Kristal is blaring. Sibella is unmarried. Sibella is softish. Rough, softish people are catholic. White people are pemphigous. If someone is unmarried then they are softish. All unmarried people are righteous. If Kristal is unmarried and Kristal is pemphigous then Kristal is not blaring. If Eada is unmarried and Eada is pemphigous then Eada is not rippled. If Sibella is softish and Sibella is blaring then Sibella is righteous. If someone is unmarried and not rippled then they are not blaring. Sibella is not rippled.", "logic": "\nRighteous(eada)\nUnmarried(eada)\nnot Blaring(eada)\nPemphigous(kristal)\nRighteous(kristal)\nCatholic(kristal)\nRippled(kristal)\nBlaring(kristal)\nUnmarried(sibella)\nSoftish(sibella)\nforall x (Rippled(x) and Softish(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Softish(x) -> Pemphigous(x))\nforall x (Unmarried(x) -> Softish(x))\nforall x (Unmarried(x) -> Righteous(x))\nUnmarried(kristal) and Pemphigous(kristal) -> not Blaring(kristal)\nUnmarried(eada) and Pemphigous(eada) -> not Rippled(eada)\nSoftish(sibella) and Blaring(sibella) -> Righteous(sibella)\nforall x (Unmarried(x) and not Rippled(x) -> not Blaring(x))\n\nnot Rippled(sibella)\n\nnot Rippled(sibella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "Marlow is truthful. Marlow is choric. Marlow is not supernal. Hezekiah is callous. Hezekiah is truthful. Hezekiah is blotchy. Hezekiah is crapulent. Hezekiah is supernal. Renee is choric. Renee is frankish. Rough, frankish people are blotchy. White people are callous. If someone is choric then they are frankish. All choric people are truthful. If Hezekiah is choric and Hezekiah is callous then Hezekiah is not supernal. If Marlow is choric and Marlow is callous then Marlow is not crapulent. If Renee is frankish and Renee is supernal then Renee is truthful. If someone is choric and not crapulent then they are not supernal. Hezekiah is choric.", "logic": "\nTruthful(marlow)\nChoric(marlow)\nnot Supernal(marlow)\nCallous(hezekiah)\nTruthful(hezekiah)\nBlotchy(hezekiah)\nCrapulent(hezekiah)\nSupernal(hezekiah)\nChoric(renee)\nFrankish(renee)\nforall x (Crapulent(x) and Frankish(x) -> Blotchy(x))\nforall x (Frankish(x) -> Callous(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Frankish(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Truthful(x))\nChoric(hezekiah) and Callous(hezekiah) -> not Supernal(hezekiah)\nChoric(marlow) and Callous(marlow) -> not Crapulent(marlow)\nFrankish(renee) and Supernal(renee) -> Truthful(renee)\nforall x (Choric(x) and not Crapulent(x) -> not Supernal(x))\n\nChoric(hezekiah)\n\nChoric(hezekiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-567"} {"premises": "The thom hoax the elysia. The thom causeway the marv. The thom is queer. The thom is hooklike. The thom does not need the marinna. The thom pasture the marv. The elysia is mirky. The elysia pasture the marinna. The marinna hoax the elysia. The marinna causeway the marv. The marinna is queer. The marv hoax the marinna. The marv causeway the elysia. The marv does not eat the marinna. The marv is undefended. The marv pasture the elysia. If something hoax the marinna then it is undefended. If something pasture the marinna then it pasture the elysia. If something pasture the elysia then it causeway the elysia. If the elysia is undefended then the elysia pasture the marv. If something causeway the elysia then it does not eat the marv. If something hoax the marv and the marv does not eat the elysia then the marv is not hooklike. If something is hooklike then it is queer. If something causeway the marinna and it is queer then it does not chase the elysia. The marv pasture the elysia.", "logic": "\nHoax(thom, elysia)\nCauseway(thom, marv)\nQueer(thom)\nHooklike(thom)\nnot Pasture(thom, marinna)\nPasture(thom, marv)\nMirky(elysia)\nPasture(elysia, marinna)\nHoax(marinna, elysia)\nCauseway(marinna, marv)\nQueer(marinna)\nHoax(marv, marinna)\nCauseway(marv, elysia)\nnot Causeway(marv, marinna)\nUndefended(marv)\nPasture(marv, elysia)\nforall x (Hoax(x, marinna) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Pasture(x, marinna) -> Pasture(x, elysia))\nforall x (Pasture(x, elysia) -> Causeway(x, elysia))\nUndefended(elysia) -> Pasture(elysia, marv)\nforall x (Causeway(x, elysia) -> not Causeway(x, marv))\nforall x (Hoax(x, marv) and not Causeway(marv, elysia) -> not Hooklike(marv))\nforall x (Hooklike(x) -> Queer(x))\nforall x (Causeway(x, marinna) and Queer(x) -> not Hoax(x, elysia))\n\nPasture(marv, elysia)\n\ntherefore Pasture(marv, elysia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The barbey imbed the aldus. The barbey wrawl the son. The barbey is incident. The barbey is racemose. The barbey does not need the ashby. The barbey misinform the son. The aldus is passionate. The aldus misinform the ashby. The ashby imbed the aldus. The ashby wrawl the son. The ashby is incident. The son imbed the ashby. The son wrawl the aldus. The son does not eat the ashby. The son is obstinate. The son misinform the aldus. If something imbed the ashby then it is obstinate. If something misinform the ashby then it misinform the aldus. If something misinform the aldus then it wrawl the aldus. If the aldus is obstinate then the aldus misinform the son. If something wrawl the aldus then it does not eat the son. If something imbed the son and the son does not eat the aldus then the son is not racemose. If something is racemose then it is incident. If something wrawl the ashby and it is incident then it does not chase the aldus. The son does not eat the aldus.", "logic": "\nImbed(barbey, aldus)\nWrawl(barbey, son)\nIncident(barbey)\nRacemose(barbey)\nnot Misinform(barbey, ashby)\nMisinform(barbey, son)\nPassionate(aldus)\nMisinform(aldus, ashby)\nImbed(ashby, aldus)\nWrawl(ashby, son)\nIncident(ashby)\nImbed(son, ashby)\nWrawl(son, aldus)\nnot Wrawl(son, ashby)\nObstinate(son)\nMisinform(son, aldus)\nforall x (Imbed(x, ashby) -> Obstinate(x))\nforall x (Misinform(x, ashby) -> Misinform(x, aldus))\nforall x (Misinform(x, aldus) -> Wrawl(x, aldus))\nObstinate(aldus) -> Misinform(aldus, son)\nforall x (Wrawl(x, aldus) -> not Wrawl(x, son))\nforall x (Imbed(x, son) and not Wrawl(son, aldus) -> not Racemose(son))\nforall x (Racemose(x) -> Incident(x))\nforall x (Wrawl(x, ashby) and Incident(x) -> not Imbed(x, aldus))\n\nnot Wrawl(son, aldus)\n\ntherefore Wrawl(son, aldus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The judith adduct the rorie. The judith hill the elonore. The judith is isolated. The judith is barefooted. The judith does not need the thatcher. The judith blank the elonore. The rorie is unsloped. The rorie blank the thatcher. The thatcher adduct the rorie. The thatcher hill the elonore. The thatcher is isolated. The elonore adduct the thatcher. The elonore hill the rorie. The elonore does not eat the thatcher. The elonore is incensed. The elonore blank the rorie. If something adduct the thatcher then it is incensed. If something blank the thatcher then it blank the rorie. If something blank the rorie then it hill the rorie. If the rorie is incensed then the rorie blank the elonore. If something hill the rorie then it does not eat the elonore. If something adduct the elonore and the elonore does not eat the rorie then the elonore is not barefooted. If something is barefooted then it is isolated. If something hill the thatcher and it is isolated then it does not chase the rorie. The elonore does not eat the elonore.", "logic": "\nAdduct(judith, rorie)\nHill(judith, elonore)\nIsolated(judith)\nBarefooted(judith)\nnot Blank(judith, thatcher)\nBlank(judith, elonore)\nUnsloped(rorie)\nBlank(rorie, thatcher)\nAdduct(thatcher, rorie)\nHill(thatcher, elonore)\nIsolated(thatcher)\nAdduct(elonore, thatcher)\nHill(elonore, rorie)\nnot Hill(elonore, thatcher)\nIncensed(elonore)\nBlank(elonore, rorie)\nforall x (Adduct(x, thatcher) -> Incensed(x))\nforall x (Blank(x, thatcher) -> Blank(x, rorie))\nforall x (Blank(x, rorie) -> Hill(x, rorie))\nIncensed(rorie) -> Blank(rorie, elonore)\nforall x (Hill(x, rorie) -> not Hill(x, elonore))\nforall x (Adduct(x, elonore) and not Hill(elonore, rorie) -> not Barefooted(elonore))\nforall x (Barefooted(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Hill(x, thatcher) and Isolated(x) -> not Adduct(x, rorie))\n\nnot Hill(elonore, elonore)\n\nHill(elonore, rorie) and forall x (Hill(x, rorie) -> not Hill(x, elonore)) -> therefore not Hill(elonore, elonore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The paolina unclasp the titus. The paolina recuse the rebbecca. The paolina is quantal. The paolina is loverlike. The paolina does not need the vlad. The paolina align the rebbecca. The titus is embedded. The titus align the vlad. The vlad unclasp the titus. The vlad recuse the rebbecca. The vlad is quantal. The rebbecca unclasp the vlad. The rebbecca recuse the titus. The rebbecca does not eat the vlad. The rebbecca is unbounded. The rebbecca align the titus. If something unclasp the vlad then it is unbounded. If something align the vlad then it align the titus. If something align the titus then it recuse the titus. If the titus is unbounded then the titus align the rebbecca. If something recuse the titus then it does not eat the rebbecca. If something unclasp the rebbecca and the rebbecca does not eat the titus then the rebbecca is not loverlike. If something is loverlike then it is quantal. If something recuse the vlad and it is quantal then it does not chase the titus. The titus does not need the titus.", "logic": "\nUnclasp(paolina, titus)\nRecuse(paolina, rebbecca)\nQuantal(paolina)\nLoverlike(paolina)\nnot Align(paolina, vlad)\nAlign(paolina, rebbecca)\nEmbedded(titus)\nAlign(titus, vlad)\nUnclasp(vlad, titus)\nRecuse(vlad, rebbecca)\nQuantal(vlad)\nUnclasp(rebbecca, vlad)\nRecuse(rebbecca, titus)\nnot Recuse(rebbecca, vlad)\nUnbounded(rebbecca)\nAlign(rebbecca, titus)\nforall x (Unclasp(x, vlad) -> Unbounded(x))\nforall x (Align(x, vlad) -> Align(x, titus))\nforall x (Align(x, titus) -> Recuse(x, titus))\nUnbounded(titus) -> Align(titus, rebbecca)\nforall x (Recuse(x, titus) -> not Recuse(x, rebbecca))\nforall x (Unclasp(x, rebbecca) and not Recuse(rebbecca, titus) -> not Loverlike(rebbecca))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Quantal(x))\nforall x (Recuse(x, vlad) and Quantal(x) -> not Unclasp(x, titus))\n\nnot Align(titus, titus)\n\nAlign(titus, vlad) and forall x (Align(x, vlad) -> Align(x, titus)) -> therefore Align(titus, titus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The modesta larrup the dinnie. The modesta hitchhike the tarrance. The modesta is trochaic. The modesta is synchronal. The modesta does not need the micheline. The modesta retrace the tarrance. The dinnie is variolous. The dinnie retrace the micheline. The micheline larrup the dinnie. The micheline hitchhike the tarrance. The micheline is trochaic. The tarrance larrup the micheline. The tarrance hitchhike the dinnie. The tarrance does not eat the micheline. The tarrance is fulgurant. The tarrance retrace the dinnie. If something larrup the micheline then it is fulgurant. If something retrace the micheline then it retrace the dinnie. If something retrace the dinnie then it hitchhike the dinnie. If the dinnie is fulgurant then the dinnie retrace the tarrance. If something hitchhike the dinnie then it does not eat the tarrance. If something larrup the tarrance and the tarrance does not eat the dinnie then the tarrance is not synchronal. If something is synchronal then it is trochaic. If something hitchhike the micheline and it is trochaic then it does not chase the dinnie. The dinnie hitchhike the dinnie.", "logic": "\nLarrup(modesta, dinnie)\nHitchhike(modesta, tarrance)\nTrochaic(modesta)\nSynchronal(modesta)\nnot Retrace(modesta, micheline)\nRetrace(modesta, tarrance)\nVariolous(dinnie)\nRetrace(dinnie, micheline)\nLarrup(micheline, dinnie)\nHitchhike(micheline, tarrance)\nTrochaic(micheline)\nLarrup(tarrance, micheline)\nHitchhike(tarrance, dinnie)\nnot Hitchhike(tarrance, micheline)\nFulgurant(tarrance)\nRetrace(tarrance, dinnie)\nforall x (Larrup(x, micheline) -> Fulgurant(x))\nforall x (Retrace(x, micheline) -> Retrace(x, dinnie))\nforall x (Retrace(x, dinnie) -> Hitchhike(x, dinnie))\nFulgurant(dinnie) -> Retrace(dinnie, tarrance)\nforall x (Hitchhike(x, dinnie) -> not Hitchhike(x, tarrance))\nforall x (Larrup(x, tarrance) and not Hitchhike(tarrance, dinnie) -> not Synchronal(tarrance))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Trochaic(x))\nforall x (Hitchhike(x, micheline) and Trochaic(x) -> not Larrup(x, dinnie))\n\nHitchhike(dinnie, dinnie)\n\nRetrace(dinnie, micheline) and forall x (Retrace(x, micheline) -> Retrace(x, dinnie)) -> therefore Retrace(dinnie, dinnie) Retrace(dinnie, dinnie) and forall x (Retrace(x, dinnie) -> Hitchhike(x, dinnie)) -> therefore Hitchhike(dinnie, dinnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The hazel gibe the towney. The hazel compress the ash. The hazel is sebaceous. The hazel is next. The hazel does not need the jacquetta. The hazel frost the ash. The towney is vested. The towney frost the jacquetta. The jacquetta gibe the towney. The jacquetta compress the ash. The jacquetta is sebaceous. The ash gibe the jacquetta. The ash compress the towney. The ash does not eat the jacquetta. The ash is swordlike. The ash frost the towney. If something gibe the jacquetta then it is swordlike. If something frost the jacquetta then it frost the towney. If something frost the towney then it compress the towney. If the towney is swordlike then the towney frost the ash. If something compress the towney then it does not eat the ash. If something gibe the ash and the ash does not eat the towney then the ash is not next. If something is next then it is sebaceous. If something compress the jacquetta and it is sebaceous then it does not chase the towney. The towney does not eat the towney.", "logic": "\nGibe(hazel, towney)\nCompress(hazel, ash)\nSebaceous(hazel)\nNext(hazel)\nnot Frost(hazel, jacquetta)\nFrost(hazel, ash)\nVested(towney)\nFrost(towney, jacquetta)\nGibe(jacquetta, towney)\nCompress(jacquetta, ash)\nSebaceous(jacquetta)\nGibe(ash, jacquetta)\nCompress(ash, towney)\nnot Compress(ash, jacquetta)\nSwordlike(ash)\nFrost(ash, towney)\nforall x (Gibe(x, jacquetta) -> Swordlike(x))\nforall x (Frost(x, jacquetta) -> Frost(x, towney))\nforall x (Frost(x, towney) -> Compress(x, towney))\nSwordlike(towney) -> Frost(towney, ash)\nforall x (Compress(x, towney) -> not Compress(x, ash))\nforall x (Gibe(x, ash) and not Compress(ash, towney) -> not Next(ash))\nforall x (Next(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nforall x (Compress(x, jacquetta) and Sebaceous(x) -> not Gibe(x, towney))\n\nnot Compress(towney, towney)\n\nFrost(towney, jacquetta) and forall x (Frost(x, jacquetta) -> Frost(x, towney)) -> therefore Frost(towney, towney) Frost(towney, towney) and forall x (Frost(x, towney) -> Compress(x, towney)) -> therefore Compress(towney, towney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The kathlene span the rhetta. The kathlene communise the berrie. The kathlene is energetic. The kathlene is stalemated. The kathlene does not need the sibby. The kathlene blackleg the berrie. The rhetta is roving. The rhetta blackleg the sibby. The sibby span the rhetta. The sibby communise the berrie. The sibby is energetic. The berrie span the sibby. The berrie communise the rhetta. The berrie does not eat the sibby. The berrie is calcaneal. The berrie blackleg the rhetta. If something span the sibby then it is calcaneal. If something blackleg the sibby then it blackleg the rhetta. If something blackleg the rhetta then it communise the rhetta. If the rhetta is calcaneal then the rhetta blackleg the berrie. If something communise the rhetta then it does not eat the berrie. If something span the berrie and the berrie does not eat the rhetta then the berrie is not stalemated. If something is stalemated then it is energetic. If something communise the sibby and it is energetic then it does not chase the rhetta. The rhetta does not eat the berrie.", "logic": "\nSpan(kathlene, rhetta)\nCommunise(kathlene, berrie)\nEnergetic(kathlene)\nStalemated(kathlene)\nnot Blackleg(kathlene, sibby)\nBlackleg(kathlene, berrie)\nRoving(rhetta)\nBlackleg(rhetta, sibby)\nSpan(sibby, rhetta)\nCommunise(sibby, berrie)\nEnergetic(sibby)\nSpan(berrie, sibby)\nCommunise(berrie, rhetta)\nnot Communise(berrie, sibby)\nCalcaneal(berrie)\nBlackleg(berrie, rhetta)\nforall x (Span(x, sibby) -> Calcaneal(x))\nforall x (Blackleg(x, sibby) -> Blackleg(x, rhetta))\nforall x (Blackleg(x, rhetta) -> Communise(x, rhetta))\nCalcaneal(rhetta) -> Blackleg(rhetta, berrie)\nforall x (Communise(x, rhetta) -> not Communise(x, berrie))\nforall x (Span(x, berrie) and not Communise(berrie, rhetta) -> not Stalemated(berrie))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) -> Energetic(x))\nforall x (Communise(x, sibby) and Energetic(x) -> not Span(x, rhetta))\n\nnot Communise(rhetta, berrie)\n\nBlackleg(rhetta, sibby) and forall x (Blackleg(x, sibby) -> Blackleg(x, rhetta)) -> therefore Blackleg(rhetta, rhetta) Blackleg(rhetta, rhetta) and forall x (Blackleg(x, rhetta) -> Communise(x, rhetta)) -> therefore Communise(rhetta, rhetta) Communise(rhetta, rhetta) and forall x (Communise(x, rhetta) -> not Communise(x, berrie)) -> therefore not Communise(rhetta, berrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The riane vouch the theresita. The riane bethink the rita. The riane is autogamic. The riane is harnessed. The riane does not need the chanda. The riane colour the rita. The theresita is lifeless. The theresita colour the chanda. The chanda vouch the theresita. The chanda bethink the rita. The chanda is autogamic. The rita vouch the chanda. The rita bethink the theresita. The rita does not eat the chanda. The rita is live. The rita colour the theresita. If something vouch the chanda then it is live. If something colour the chanda then it colour the theresita. If something colour the theresita then it bethink the theresita. If the theresita is live then the theresita colour the rita. If something bethink the theresita then it does not eat the rita. If something vouch the rita and the rita does not eat the theresita then the rita is not harnessed. If something is harnessed then it is autogamic. If something bethink the chanda and it is autogamic then it does not chase the theresita. The theresita bethink the rita.", "logic": "\nVouch(riane, theresita)\nBethink(riane, rita)\nAutogamic(riane)\nHarnessed(riane)\nnot Colour(riane, chanda)\nColour(riane, rita)\nLifeless(theresita)\nColour(theresita, chanda)\nVouch(chanda, theresita)\nBethink(chanda, rita)\nAutogamic(chanda)\nVouch(rita, chanda)\nBethink(rita, theresita)\nnot Bethink(rita, chanda)\nLive(rita)\nColour(rita, theresita)\nforall x (Vouch(x, chanda) -> Live(x))\nforall x (Colour(x, chanda) -> Colour(x, theresita))\nforall x (Colour(x, theresita) -> Bethink(x, theresita))\nLive(theresita) -> Colour(theresita, rita)\nforall x (Bethink(x, theresita) -> not Bethink(x, rita))\nforall x (Vouch(x, rita) and not Bethink(rita, theresita) -> not Harnessed(rita))\nforall x (Harnessed(x) -> Autogamic(x))\nforall x (Bethink(x, chanda) and Autogamic(x) -> not Vouch(x, theresita))\n\nBethink(theresita, rita)\n\nColour(theresita, chanda) and forall x (Colour(x, chanda) -> Colour(x, theresita)) -> therefore Colour(theresita, theresita) Colour(theresita, theresita) and forall x (Colour(x, theresita) -> Bethink(x, theresita)) -> therefore Bethink(theresita, theresita) Bethink(theresita, theresita) and forall x (Bethink(x, theresita) -> not Bethink(x, rita)) -> therefore not Bethink(theresita, rita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The golda bond the cherlyn. The golda girdle the sherill. The golda is saclike. The golda is bahamian. The golda does not need the canada. The golda accent the sherill. The cherlyn is nonwoody. The cherlyn accent the canada. The canada bond the cherlyn. The canada girdle the sherill. The canada is saclike. The sherill bond the canada. The sherill girdle the cherlyn. The sherill does not eat the canada. The sherill is vanilla. The sherill accent the cherlyn. If something bond the canada then it is vanilla. If something accent the canada then it accent the cherlyn. If something accent the cherlyn then it girdle the cherlyn. If the cherlyn is vanilla then the cherlyn accent the sherill. If something girdle the cherlyn then it does not eat the sherill. If something bond the sherill and the sherill does not eat the cherlyn then the sherill is not bahamian. If something is bahamian then it is saclike. If something girdle the canada and it is saclike then it does not chase the cherlyn. The sherill is not saclike.", "logic": "\nBond(golda, cherlyn)\nGirdle(golda, sherill)\nSaclike(golda)\nBahamian(golda)\nnot Accent(golda, canada)\nAccent(golda, sherill)\nNonwoody(cherlyn)\nAccent(cherlyn, canada)\nBond(canada, cherlyn)\nGirdle(canada, sherill)\nSaclike(canada)\nBond(sherill, canada)\nGirdle(sherill, cherlyn)\nnot Girdle(sherill, canada)\nVanilla(sherill)\nAccent(sherill, cherlyn)\nforall x (Bond(x, canada) -> Vanilla(x))\nforall x (Accent(x, canada) -> Accent(x, cherlyn))\nforall x (Accent(x, cherlyn) -> Girdle(x, cherlyn))\nVanilla(cherlyn) -> Accent(cherlyn, sherill)\nforall x (Girdle(x, cherlyn) -> not Girdle(x, sherill))\nforall x (Bond(x, sherill) and not Girdle(sherill, cherlyn) -> not Bahamian(sherill))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Saclike(x))\nforall x (Girdle(x, canada) and Saclike(x) -> not Bond(x, cherlyn))\n\nnot Saclike(sherill)\n\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Saclike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The mignonne find the fredia. The mignonne optimize the kelly. The mignonne is apian. The mignonne is movable. The mignonne does not need the skip. The mignonne doodle the kelly. The fredia is antepartum. The fredia doodle the skip. The skip find the fredia. The skip optimize the kelly. The skip is apian. The kelly find the skip. The kelly optimize the fredia. The kelly does not eat the skip. The kelly is nutritive. The kelly doodle the fredia. If something find the skip then it is nutritive. If something doodle the skip then it doodle the fredia. If something doodle the fredia then it optimize the fredia. If the fredia is nutritive then the fredia doodle the kelly. If something optimize the fredia then it does not eat the kelly. If something find the kelly and the kelly does not eat the fredia then the kelly is not movable. If something is movable then it is apian. If something optimize the skip and it is apian then it does not chase the fredia. The fredia doodle the kelly.", "logic": "\nFind(mignonne, fredia)\nOptimize(mignonne, kelly)\nApian(mignonne)\nMovable(mignonne)\nnot Doodle(mignonne, skip)\nDoodle(mignonne, kelly)\nAntepartum(fredia)\nDoodle(fredia, skip)\nFind(skip, fredia)\nOptimize(skip, kelly)\nApian(skip)\nFind(kelly, skip)\nOptimize(kelly, fredia)\nnot Optimize(kelly, skip)\nNutritive(kelly)\nDoodle(kelly, fredia)\nforall x (Find(x, skip) -> Nutritive(x))\nforall x (Doodle(x, skip) -> Doodle(x, fredia))\nforall x (Doodle(x, fredia) -> Optimize(x, fredia))\nNutritive(fredia) -> Doodle(fredia, kelly)\nforall x (Optimize(x, fredia) -> not Optimize(x, kelly))\nforall x (Find(x, kelly) and not Optimize(kelly, fredia) -> not Movable(kelly))\nforall x (Movable(x) -> Apian(x))\nforall x (Optimize(x, skip) and Apian(x) -> not Find(x, fredia))\n\nDoodle(fredia, kelly)\n\nNutritive(fredia) -> Doodle(fredia, kelly) <- forall x (Find(x, skip) -> Nutritive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The vida literalize the hallie. The vida fraternize the eugen. The vida is irregular. The vida is unworkable. The vida does not need the leora. The vida flock the eugen. The hallie is rattled. The hallie flock the leora. The leora literalize the hallie. The leora fraternize the eugen. The leora is irregular. The eugen literalize the leora. The eugen fraternize the hallie. The eugen does not eat the leora. The eugen is reviving. The eugen flock the hallie. If something literalize the leora then it is reviving. If something flock the leora then it flock the hallie. If something flock the hallie then it fraternize the hallie. If the hallie is reviving then the hallie flock the eugen. If something fraternize the hallie then it does not eat the eugen. If something literalize the eugen and the eugen does not eat the hallie then the eugen is not unworkable. If something is unworkable then it is irregular. If something fraternize the leora and it is irregular then it does not chase the hallie. The leora is not reviving.", "logic": "\nLiteralize(vida, hallie)\nFraternize(vida, eugen)\nIrregular(vida)\nUnworkable(vida)\nnot Flock(vida, leora)\nFlock(vida, eugen)\nRattled(hallie)\nFlock(hallie, leora)\nLiteralize(leora, hallie)\nFraternize(leora, eugen)\nIrregular(leora)\nLiteralize(eugen, leora)\nFraternize(eugen, hallie)\nnot Fraternize(eugen, leora)\nReviving(eugen)\nFlock(eugen, hallie)\nforall x (Literalize(x, leora) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Flock(x, leora) -> Flock(x, hallie))\nforall x (Flock(x, hallie) -> Fraternize(x, hallie))\nReviving(hallie) -> Flock(hallie, eugen)\nforall x (Fraternize(x, hallie) -> not Fraternize(x, eugen))\nforall x (Literalize(x, eugen) and not Fraternize(eugen, hallie) -> not Unworkable(eugen))\nforall x (Unworkable(x) -> Irregular(x))\nforall x (Fraternize(x, leora) and Irregular(x) -> not Literalize(x, hallie))\n\nnot Reviving(leora)\n\nforall x (Literalize(x, leora) -> Reviving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The orsa pearl the willi. The orsa validate the eleanora. The orsa is sabbatic. The orsa is ancient. The orsa does not need the urbano. The orsa unchain the eleanora. The willi is prolix. The willi unchain the urbano. The urbano pearl the willi. The urbano validate the eleanora. The urbano is sabbatic. The eleanora pearl the urbano. The eleanora validate the willi. The eleanora does not eat the urbano. The eleanora is pilous. The eleanora unchain the willi. If something pearl the urbano then it is pilous. If something unchain the urbano then it unchain the willi. If something unchain the willi then it validate the willi. If the willi is pilous then the willi unchain the eleanora. If something validate the willi then it does not eat the eleanora. If something pearl the eleanora and the eleanora does not eat the willi then the eleanora is not ancient. If something is ancient then it is sabbatic. If something validate the urbano and it is sabbatic then it does not chase the willi. The orsa validate the willi.", "logic": "\nPearl(orsa, willi)\nValidate(orsa, eleanora)\nSabbatic(orsa)\nAncient(orsa)\nnot Unchain(orsa, urbano)\nUnchain(orsa, eleanora)\nProlix(willi)\nUnchain(willi, urbano)\nPearl(urbano, willi)\nValidate(urbano, eleanora)\nSabbatic(urbano)\nPearl(eleanora, urbano)\nValidate(eleanora, willi)\nnot Validate(eleanora, urbano)\nPilous(eleanora)\nUnchain(eleanora, willi)\nforall x (Pearl(x, urbano) -> Pilous(x))\nforall x (Unchain(x, urbano) -> Unchain(x, willi))\nforall x (Unchain(x, willi) -> Validate(x, willi))\nPilous(willi) -> Unchain(willi, eleanora)\nforall x (Validate(x, willi) -> not Validate(x, eleanora))\nforall x (Pearl(x, eleanora) and not Validate(eleanora, willi) -> not Ancient(eleanora))\nforall x (Ancient(x) -> Sabbatic(x))\nforall x (Validate(x, urbano) and Sabbatic(x) -> not Pearl(x, willi))\n\nValidate(orsa, willi)\n\nforall x (Unchain(x, willi) -> Validate(x, willi)) <- forall x (Unchain(x, urbano) -> Unchain(x, willi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The jaimie melanize the arlana. The jaimie resplend the jen. The jaimie is organized. The jaimie is lanate. The jaimie does not need the erena. The jaimie goofproof the jen. The arlana is model. The arlana goofproof the erena. The erena melanize the arlana. The erena resplend the jen. The erena is organized. The jen melanize the erena. The jen resplend the arlana. The jen does not eat the erena. The jen is darwinian. The jen goofproof the arlana. If something melanize the erena then it is darwinian. If something goofproof the erena then it goofproof the arlana. If something goofproof the arlana then it resplend the arlana. If the arlana is darwinian then the arlana goofproof the jen. If something resplend the arlana then it does not eat the jen. If something melanize the jen and the jen does not eat the arlana then the jen is not lanate. If something is lanate then it is organized. If something resplend the erena and it is organized then it does not chase the arlana. The arlana does not chase the jaimie.", "logic": "\nMelanize(jaimie, arlana)\nResplend(jaimie, jen)\nOrganized(jaimie)\nLanate(jaimie)\nnot Goofproof(jaimie, erena)\nGoofproof(jaimie, jen)\nModel(arlana)\nGoofproof(arlana, erena)\nMelanize(erena, arlana)\nResplend(erena, jen)\nOrganized(erena)\nMelanize(jen, erena)\nResplend(jen, arlana)\nnot Resplend(jen, erena)\nDarwinian(jen)\nGoofproof(jen, arlana)\nforall x (Melanize(x, erena) -> Darwinian(x))\nforall x (Goofproof(x, erena) -> Goofproof(x, arlana))\nforall x (Goofproof(x, arlana) -> Resplend(x, arlana))\nDarwinian(arlana) -> Goofproof(arlana, jen)\nforall x (Resplend(x, arlana) -> not Resplend(x, jen))\nforall x (Melanize(x, jen) and not Resplend(jen, arlana) -> not Lanate(jen))\nforall x (Lanate(x) -> Organized(x))\nforall x (Resplend(x, erena) and Organized(x) -> not Melanize(x, arlana))\n\nnot Melanize(arlana, jaimie)\n\nnot Melanize(arlana, jaimie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The becki degrease the carlynne. The becki dilute the sheila. The becki is majestic. The becki is unapparent. The becki does not need the yuri. The becki lope the sheila. The carlynne is irritable. The carlynne lope the yuri. The yuri degrease the carlynne. The yuri dilute the sheila. The yuri is majestic. The sheila degrease the yuri. The sheila dilute the carlynne. The sheila does not eat the yuri. The sheila is headlike. The sheila lope the carlynne. If something degrease the yuri then it is headlike. If something lope the yuri then it lope the carlynne. If something lope the carlynne then it dilute the carlynne. If the carlynne is headlike then the carlynne lope the sheila. If something dilute the carlynne then it does not eat the sheila. If something degrease the sheila and the sheila does not eat the carlynne then the sheila is not unapparent. If something is unapparent then it is majestic. If something dilute the yuri and it is majestic then it does not chase the carlynne. The sheila lope the sheila.", "logic": "\nDegrease(becki, carlynne)\nDilute(becki, sheila)\nMajestic(becki)\nUnapparent(becki)\nnot Lope(becki, yuri)\nLope(becki, sheila)\nIrritable(carlynne)\nLope(carlynne, yuri)\nDegrease(yuri, carlynne)\nDilute(yuri, sheila)\nMajestic(yuri)\nDegrease(sheila, yuri)\nDilute(sheila, carlynne)\nnot Dilute(sheila, yuri)\nHeadlike(sheila)\nLope(sheila, carlynne)\nforall x (Degrease(x, yuri) -> Headlike(x))\nforall x (Lope(x, yuri) -> Lope(x, carlynne))\nforall x (Lope(x, carlynne) -> Dilute(x, carlynne))\nHeadlike(carlynne) -> Lope(carlynne, sheila)\nforall x (Dilute(x, carlynne) -> not Dilute(x, sheila))\nforall x (Degrease(x, sheila) and not Dilute(sheila, carlynne) -> not Unapparent(sheila))\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> Majestic(x))\nforall x (Dilute(x, yuri) and Majestic(x) -> not Degrease(x, carlynne))\n\nLope(sheila, sheila)\n\nLope(sheila, sheila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The leoine trade the clark. The leoine barrack the ermina. The leoine is atrophied. The leoine is amnesic. The leoine does not need the mellisent. The leoine typeset the ermina. The clark is delusory. The clark typeset the mellisent. The mellisent trade the clark. The mellisent barrack the ermina. The mellisent is atrophied. The ermina trade the mellisent. The ermina barrack the clark. The ermina does not eat the mellisent. The ermina is equivocal. The ermina typeset the clark. If something trade the mellisent then it is equivocal. If something typeset the mellisent then it typeset the clark. If something typeset the clark then it barrack the clark. If the clark is equivocal then the clark typeset the ermina. If something barrack the clark then it does not eat the ermina. If something trade the ermina and the ermina does not eat the clark then the ermina is not amnesic. If something is amnesic then it is atrophied. If something barrack the mellisent and it is atrophied then it does not chase the clark. The clark does not eat the mellisent.", "logic": "\nTrade(leoine, clark)\nBarrack(leoine, ermina)\nAtrophied(leoine)\nAmnesic(leoine)\nnot Typeset(leoine, mellisent)\nTypeset(leoine, ermina)\nDelusory(clark)\nTypeset(clark, mellisent)\nTrade(mellisent, clark)\nBarrack(mellisent, ermina)\nAtrophied(mellisent)\nTrade(ermina, mellisent)\nBarrack(ermina, clark)\nnot Barrack(ermina, mellisent)\nEquivocal(ermina)\nTypeset(ermina, clark)\nforall x (Trade(x, mellisent) -> Equivocal(x))\nforall x (Typeset(x, mellisent) -> Typeset(x, clark))\nforall x (Typeset(x, clark) -> Barrack(x, clark))\nEquivocal(clark) -> Typeset(clark, ermina)\nforall x (Barrack(x, clark) -> not Barrack(x, ermina))\nforall x (Trade(x, ermina) and not Barrack(ermina, clark) -> not Amnesic(ermina))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Barrack(x, mellisent) and Atrophied(x) -> not Trade(x, clark))\n\nnot Barrack(clark, mellisent)\n\nnot Barrack(clark, mellisent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The bernd overtake the catarina. The bernd bombproof the brandie. The bernd is brimfull. The bernd is abranchial. The bernd does not need the eleanora. The bernd fagot the brandie. The catarina is assuming. The catarina fagot the eleanora. The eleanora overtake the catarina. The eleanora bombproof the brandie. The eleanora is brimfull. The brandie overtake the eleanora. The brandie bombproof the catarina. The brandie does not eat the eleanora. The brandie is distaff. The brandie fagot the catarina. If something overtake the eleanora then it is distaff. If something fagot the eleanora then it fagot the catarina. If something fagot the catarina then it bombproof the catarina. If the catarina is distaff then the catarina fagot the brandie. If something bombproof the catarina then it does not eat the brandie. If something overtake the brandie and the brandie does not eat the catarina then the brandie is not abranchial. If something is abranchial then it is brimfull. If something bombproof the eleanora and it is brimfull then it does not chase the catarina. The bernd bombproof the bernd.", "logic": "\nOvertake(bernd, catarina)\nBombproof(bernd, brandie)\nBrimfull(bernd)\nAbranchial(bernd)\nnot Fagot(bernd, eleanora)\nFagot(bernd, brandie)\nAssuming(catarina)\nFagot(catarina, eleanora)\nOvertake(eleanora, catarina)\nBombproof(eleanora, brandie)\nBrimfull(eleanora)\nOvertake(brandie, eleanora)\nBombproof(brandie, catarina)\nnot Bombproof(brandie, eleanora)\nDistaff(brandie)\nFagot(brandie, catarina)\nforall x (Overtake(x, eleanora) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Fagot(x, eleanora) -> Fagot(x, catarina))\nforall x (Fagot(x, catarina) -> Bombproof(x, catarina))\nDistaff(catarina) -> Fagot(catarina, brandie)\nforall x (Bombproof(x, catarina) -> not Bombproof(x, brandie))\nforall x (Overtake(x, brandie) and not Bombproof(brandie, catarina) -> not Abranchial(brandie))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) -> Brimfull(x))\nforall x (Bombproof(x, eleanora) and Brimfull(x) -> not Overtake(x, catarina))\n\nBombproof(bernd, bernd)\n\nBombproof(bernd, bernd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-486"} {"premises": "The lori overshoot the nicholas. The nicholas does not visit the lori. If something overshoot the nicholas then the nicholas does not need the lori. If something diazotize the nicholas then the nicholas does not see the lori. If something overshoot the lori then the lori diazotize the nicholas. If the nicholas does not need the lori then the lori diazotize the nicholas. If the lori diazotize the nicholas then the lori is seamanlike. If the nicholas does not see the lori then the lori is unerasable. If something is oscitant and it compensate the nicholas then it does not visit the lori. If something compensate the nicholas and it is not unerasable then it compensate the lori. The nicholas does not visit the lori.", "logic": "\nOvershoot(lori, nicholas)\nnot Compensate(nicholas, lori)\nforall x (Overshoot(x, nicholas) -> not Diazotize(nicholas, lori))\nforall x (Diazotize(x, nicholas) -> not Overshoot(nicholas, lori))\nforall x (Overshoot(x, lori) -> Diazotize(lori, nicholas))\nnot Diazotize(nicholas, lori) -> Diazotize(lori, nicholas)\nDiazotize(lori, nicholas) -> Seamanlike(lori)\nnot Overshoot(nicholas, lori) -> Unerasable(lori)\nforall x (Oscitant(x) and Compensate(x, nicholas) -> not Compensate(x, lori))\nforall x (Compensate(x, nicholas) and not Unerasable(x) -> Compensate(x, lori))\n\nnot Compensate(nicholas, lori)\n\ntherefore not Compensate(nicholas, lori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The donal advance the kenn. The kenn does not visit the donal. If something advance the kenn then the kenn does not need the donal. If something cripple the kenn then the kenn does not see the donal. If something advance the donal then the donal cripple the kenn. If the kenn does not need the donal then the donal cripple the kenn. If the donal cripple the kenn then the donal is bicyclic. If the kenn does not see the donal then the donal is pitiless. If something is imperial and it blob the kenn then it does not visit the donal. If something blob the kenn and it is not pitiless then it blob the donal. The kenn blob the donal.", "logic": "\nAdvance(donal, kenn)\nnot Blob(kenn, donal)\nforall x (Advance(x, kenn) -> not Cripple(kenn, donal))\nforall x (Cripple(x, kenn) -> not Advance(kenn, donal))\nforall x (Advance(x, donal) -> Cripple(donal, kenn))\nnot Cripple(kenn, donal) -> Cripple(donal, kenn)\nCripple(donal, kenn) -> Bicyclic(donal)\nnot Advance(kenn, donal) -> Pitiless(donal)\nforall x (Imperial(x) and Blob(x, kenn) -> not Blob(x, donal))\nforall x (Blob(x, kenn) and not Pitiless(x) -> Blob(x, donal))\n\nBlob(kenn, donal)\n\ntherefore not Blob(kenn, donal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The tod scollop the morganica. The morganica does not visit the tod. If something scollop the morganica then the morganica does not need the tod. If something orient the morganica then the morganica does not see the tod. If something scollop the tod then the tod orient the morganica. If the morganica does not need the tod then the tod orient the morganica. If the tod orient the morganica then the tod is robotlike. If the morganica does not see the tod then the tod is dendroidal. If something is solar and it insert the morganica then it does not visit the tod. If something insert the morganica and it is not dendroidal then it insert the tod. The morganica does not need the tod.", "logic": "\nScollop(tod, morganica)\nnot Insert(morganica, tod)\nforall x (Scollop(x, morganica) -> not Orient(morganica, tod))\nforall x (Orient(x, morganica) -> not Scollop(morganica, tod))\nforall x (Scollop(x, tod) -> Orient(tod, morganica))\nnot Orient(morganica, tod) -> Orient(tod, morganica)\nOrient(tod, morganica) -> Robotlike(tod)\nnot Scollop(morganica, tod) -> Dendroidal(tod)\nforall x (Solar(x) and Insert(x, morganica) -> not Insert(x, tod))\nforall x (Insert(x, morganica) and not Dendroidal(x) -> Insert(x, tod))\n\nnot Orient(morganica, tod)\n\nScollop(tod, morganica) and forall x (Scollop(x, morganica) -> not Orient(morganica, tod)) -> therefore not Orient(morganica, tod)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The vlad boogie the alaine. The alaine does not visit the vlad. If something boogie the alaine then the alaine does not need the vlad. If something unsnarl the alaine then the alaine does not see the vlad. If something boogie the vlad then the vlad unsnarl the alaine. If the alaine does not need the vlad then the vlad unsnarl the alaine. If the vlad unsnarl the alaine then the vlad is stoned. If the alaine does not see the vlad then the vlad is crinoid. If something is foaming and it debug the alaine then it does not visit the vlad. If something debug the alaine and it is not crinoid then it debug the vlad. The alaine unsnarl the vlad.", "logic": "\nBoogie(vlad, alaine)\nnot Debug(alaine, vlad)\nforall x (Boogie(x, alaine) -> not Unsnarl(alaine, vlad))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, alaine) -> not Boogie(alaine, vlad))\nforall x (Boogie(x, vlad) -> Unsnarl(vlad, alaine))\nnot Unsnarl(alaine, vlad) -> Unsnarl(vlad, alaine)\nUnsnarl(vlad, alaine) -> Stoned(vlad)\nnot Boogie(alaine, vlad) -> Crinoid(vlad)\nforall x (Foaming(x) and Debug(x, alaine) -> not Debug(x, vlad))\nforall x (Debug(x, alaine) and not Crinoid(x) -> Debug(x, vlad))\n\nUnsnarl(alaine, vlad)\n\nBoogie(vlad, alaine) and forall x (Boogie(x, alaine) -> not Unsnarl(alaine, vlad)) -> therefore not Unsnarl(alaine, vlad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The marris contact the tabb. The tabb does not visit the marris. If something contact the tabb then the tabb does not need the marris. If something return the tabb then the tabb does not see the marris. If something contact the marris then the marris return the tabb. If the tabb does not need the marris then the marris return the tabb. If the marris return the tabb then the marris is miotic. If the tabb does not see the marris then the marris is unspotted. If something is knowable and it blemish the tabb then it does not visit the marris. If something blemish the tabb and it is not unspotted then it blemish the marris. The marris return the tabb.", "logic": "\nContact(marris, tabb)\nnot Blemish(tabb, marris)\nforall x (Contact(x, tabb) -> not Return(tabb, marris))\nforall x (Return(x, tabb) -> not Contact(tabb, marris))\nforall x (Contact(x, marris) -> Return(marris, tabb))\nnot Return(tabb, marris) -> Return(marris, tabb)\nReturn(marris, tabb) -> Miotic(marris)\nnot Contact(tabb, marris) -> Unspotted(marris)\nforall x (Knowable(x) and Blemish(x, tabb) -> not Blemish(x, marris))\nforall x (Blemish(x, tabb) and not Unspotted(x) -> Blemish(x, marris))\n\nReturn(marris, tabb)\n\nContact(marris, tabb) and forall x (Contact(x, tabb) -> not Return(tabb, marris)) -> therefore not Return(tabb, marris) not Return(tabb, marris) and not Return(tabb, marris) -> Return(marris, tabb) -> therefore Return(marris, tabb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The tabina beset the darrel. The darrel does not visit the tabina. If something beset the darrel then the darrel does not need the tabina. If something discolour the darrel then the darrel does not see the tabina. If something beset the tabina then the tabina discolour the darrel. If the darrel does not need the tabina then the tabina discolour the darrel. If the tabina discolour the darrel then the tabina is padded. If the darrel does not see the tabina then the tabina is smothered. If something is patriotic and it sulphur the darrel then it does not visit the tabina. If something sulphur the darrel and it is not smothered then it sulphur the tabina. The tabina does not need the darrel.", "logic": "\nBeset(tabina, darrel)\nnot Sulphur(darrel, tabina)\nforall x (Beset(x, darrel) -> not Discolour(darrel, tabina))\nforall x (Discolour(x, darrel) -> not Beset(darrel, tabina))\nforall x (Beset(x, tabina) -> Discolour(tabina, darrel))\nnot Discolour(darrel, tabina) -> Discolour(tabina, darrel)\nDiscolour(tabina, darrel) -> Padded(tabina)\nnot Beset(darrel, tabina) -> Smothered(tabina)\nforall x (Patriotic(x) and Sulphur(x, darrel) -> not Sulphur(x, tabina))\nforall x (Sulphur(x, darrel) and not Smothered(x) -> Sulphur(x, tabina))\n\nnot Discolour(tabina, darrel)\n\nBeset(tabina, darrel) and forall x (Beset(x, darrel) -> not Discolour(darrel, tabina)) -> therefore not Discolour(darrel, tabina) not Discolour(darrel, tabina) and not Discolour(darrel, tabina) -> Discolour(tabina, darrel) -> therefore Discolour(tabina, darrel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The markus intumesce the peirce. The peirce does not visit the markus. If something intumesce the peirce then the peirce does not need the markus. If something bugle the peirce then the peirce does not see the markus. If something intumesce the markus then the markus bugle the peirce. If the peirce does not need the markus then the markus bugle the peirce. If the markus bugle the peirce then the markus is dyspneal. If the peirce does not see the markus then the markus is rapturous. If something is bauxitic and it unstrap the peirce then it does not visit the markus. If something unstrap the peirce and it is not rapturous then it unstrap the markus. The markus is dyspneal.", "logic": "\nIntumesce(markus, peirce)\nnot Unstrap(peirce, markus)\nforall x (Intumesce(x, peirce) -> not Bugle(peirce, markus))\nforall x (Bugle(x, peirce) -> not Intumesce(peirce, markus))\nforall x (Intumesce(x, markus) -> Bugle(markus, peirce))\nnot Bugle(peirce, markus) -> Bugle(markus, peirce)\nBugle(markus, peirce) -> Dyspneal(markus)\nnot Intumesce(peirce, markus) -> Rapturous(markus)\nforall x (Bauxitic(x) and Unstrap(x, peirce) -> not Unstrap(x, markus))\nforall x (Unstrap(x, peirce) and not Rapturous(x) -> Unstrap(x, markus))\n\nDyspneal(markus)\n\nIntumesce(markus, peirce) and forall x (Intumesce(x, peirce) -> not Bugle(peirce, markus)) -> therefore not Bugle(peirce, markus) not Bugle(peirce, markus) and not Bugle(peirce, markus) -> Bugle(markus, peirce) -> therefore Bugle(markus, peirce) Bugle(markus, peirce) and Bugle(markus, peirce) -> Dyspneal(markus) -> therefore Dyspneal(markus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The stevana impede the rock. The rock does not visit the stevana. If something impede the rock then the rock does not need the stevana. If something famish the rock then the rock does not see the stevana. If something impede the stevana then the stevana famish the rock. If the rock does not need the stevana then the stevana famish the rock. If the stevana famish the rock then the stevana is amyloidal. If the rock does not see the stevana then the stevana is homogenous. If something is swinging and it scorch the rock then it does not visit the stevana. If something scorch the rock and it is not homogenous then it scorch the stevana. The rock impede the stevana.", "logic": "\nImpede(stevana, rock)\nnot Scorch(rock, stevana)\nforall x (Impede(x, rock) -> not Famish(rock, stevana))\nforall x (Famish(x, rock) -> not Impede(rock, stevana))\nforall x (Impede(x, stevana) -> Famish(stevana, rock))\nnot Famish(rock, stevana) -> Famish(stevana, rock)\nFamish(stevana, rock) -> Amyloidal(stevana)\nnot Impede(rock, stevana) -> Homogenous(stevana)\nforall x (Swinging(x) and Scorch(x, rock) -> not Scorch(x, stevana))\nforall x (Scorch(x, rock) and not Homogenous(x) -> Scorch(x, stevana))\n\nImpede(rock, stevana)\n\nImpede(stevana, rock) and forall x (Impede(x, rock) -> not Famish(rock, stevana)) -> therefore not Famish(rock, stevana) not Famish(rock, stevana) and not Famish(rock, stevana) -> Famish(stevana, rock) -> therefore Famish(stevana, rock) Famish(stevana, rock) and forall x (Famish(x, rock) -> not Impede(rock, stevana)) -> therefore not Impede(rock, stevana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The goldina bayonet the reena. The reena does not visit the goldina. If something bayonet the reena then the reena does not need the goldina. If something hurry the reena then the reena does not see the goldina. If something bayonet the goldina then the goldina hurry the reena. If the reena does not need the goldina then the goldina hurry the reena. If the goldina hurry the reena then the goldina is obstinate. If the reena does not see the goldina then the goldina is braw. If something is calycled and it truss the reena then it does not visit the goldina. If something truss the reena and it is not braw then it truss the goldina. The goldina does not visit the goldina.", "logic": "\nBayonet(goldina, reena)\nnot Truss(reena, goldina)\nforall x (Bayonet(x, reena) -> not Hurry(reena, goldina))\nforall x (Hurry(x, reena) -> not Bayonet(reena, goldina))\nforall x (Bayonet(x, goldina) -> Hurry(goldina, reena))\nnot Hurry(reena, goldina) -> Hurry(goldina, reena)\nHurry(goldina, reena) -> Obstinate(goldina)\nnot Bayonet(reena, goldina) -> Braw(goldina)\nforall x (Calycled(x) and Truss(x, reena) -> not Truss(x, goldina))\nforall x (Truss(x, reena) and not Braw(x) -> Truss(x, goldina))\n\nnot Truss(goldina, goldina)\n\nforall x (Truss(x, reena) and not Braw(x) -> Truss(x, goldina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The xymenes dispirit the avraham. The avraham does not visit the xymenes. If something dispirit the avraham then the avraham does not need the xymenes. If something trumpet the avraham then the avraham does not see the xymenes. If something dispirit the xymenes then the xymenes trumpet the avraham. If the avraham does not need the xymenes then the xymenes trumpet the avraham. If the xymenes trumpet the avraham then the xymenes is opposing. If the avraham does not see the xymenes then the xymenes is basophilic. If something is pernickety and it postulate the avraham then it does not visit the xymenes. If something postulate the avraham and it is not basophilic then it postulate the xymenes. The avraham trumpet the avraham.", "logic": "\nDispirit(xymenes, avraham)\nnot Postulate(avraham, xymenes)\nforall x (Dispirit(x, avraham) -> not Trumpet(avraham, xymenes))\nforall x (Trumpet(x, avraham) -> not Dispirit(avraham, xymenes))\nforall x (Dispirit(x, xymenes) -> Trumpet(xymenes, avraham))\nnot Trumpet(avraham, xymenes) -> Trumpet(xymenes, avraham)\nTrumpet(xymenes, avraham) -> Opposing(xymenes)\nnot Dispirit(avraham, xymenes) -> Basophilic(xymenes)\nforall x (Pernickety(x) and Postulate(x, avraham) -> not Postulate(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Postulate(x, avraham) and not Basophilic(x) -> Postulate(x, xymenes))\n\nTrumpet(avraham, avraham)\n\nTrumpet(avraham, avraham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The adelina reenforce the roseanne. The roseanne does not visit the adelina. If something reenforce the roseanne then the roseanne does not need the adelina. If something alienate the roseanne then the roseanne does not see the adelina. If something reenforce the adelina then the adelina alienate the roseanne. If the roseanne does not need the adelina then the adelina alienate the roseanne. If the adelina alienate the roseanne then the adelina is lovely. If the roseanne does not see the adelina then the adelina is sublimed. If something is pleasant and it fraternize the roseanne then it does not visit the adelina. If something fraternize the roseanne and it is not sublimed then it fraternize the adelina. The roseanne does not see the roseanne.", "logic": "\nReenforce(adelina, roseanne)\nnot Fraternize(roseanne, adelina)\nforall x (Reenforce(x, roseanne) -> not Alienate(roseanne, adelina))\nforall x (Alienate(x, roseanne) -> not Reenforce(roseanne, adelina))\nforall x (Reenforce(x, adelina) -> Alienate(adelina, roseanne))\nnot Alienate(roseanne, adelina) -> Alienate(adelina, roseanne)\nAlienate(adelina, roseanne) -> Lovely(adelina)\nnot Reenforce(roseanne, adelina) -> Sublimed(adelina)\nforall x (Pleasant(x) and Fraternize(x, roseanne) -> not Fraternize(x, adelina))\nforall x (Fraternize(x, roseanne) and not Sublimed(x) -> Fraternize(x, adelina))\n\nnot Reenforce(roseanne, roseanne)\n\nnot Reenforce(roseanne, roseanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The bonita vowelize the megan. The megan does not visit the bonita. If something vowelize the megan then the megan does not need the bonita. If something besmirch the megan then the megan does not see the bonita. If something vowelize the bonita then the bonita besmirch the megan. If the megan does not need the bonita then the bonita besmirch the megan. If the bonita besmirch the megan then the bonita is german. If the megan does not see the bonita then the bonita is fabulous. If something is mediated and it severalize the megan then it does not visit the bonita. If something severalize the megan and it is not fabulous then it severalize the bonita. The megan is rough.", "logic": "\nVowelize(bonita, megan)\nnot Severalize(megan, bonita)\nforall x (Vowelize(x, megan) -> not Besmirch(megan, bonita))\nforall x (Besmirch(x, megan) -> not Vowelize(megan, bonita))\nforall x (Vowelize(x, bonita) -> Besmirch(bonita, megan))\nnot Besmirch(megan, bonita) -> Besmirch(bonita, megan)\nBesmirch(bonita, megan) -> German(bonita)\nnot Vowelize(megan, bonita) -> Fabulous(bonita)\nforall x (Mediated(x) and Severalize(x, megan) -> not Severalize(x, bonita))\nforall x (Severalize(x, megan) and not Fabulous(x) -> Severalize(x, bonita))\n\nRough(megan)\n\nRough(megan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The ginny cost the easton. The easton does not visit the ginny. If something cost the easton then the easton does not need the ginny. If something rampage the easton then the easton does not see the ginny. If something cost the ginny then the ginny rampage the easton. If the easton does not need the ginny then the ginny rampage the easton. If the ginny rampage the easton then the ginny is allylic. If the easton does not see the ginny then the ginny is randomized. If something is amerind and it dull the easton then it does not visit the ginny. If something dull the easton and it is not randomized then it dull the ginny. The ginny is not rough.", "logic": "\nCost(ginny, easton)\nnot Dull(easton, ginny)\nforall x (Cost(x, easton) -> not Rampage(easton, ginny))\nforall x (Rampage(x, easton) -> not Cost(easton, ginny))\nforall x (Cost(x, ginny) -> Rampage(ginny, easton))\nnot Rampage(easton, ginny) -> Rampage(ginny, easton)\nRampage(ginny, easton) -> Allylic(ginny)\nnot Cost(easton, ginny) -> Randomized(ginny)\nforall x (Amerind(x) and Dull(x, easton) -> not Dull(x, ginny))\nforall x (Dull(x, easton) and not Randomized(x) -> Dull(x, ginny))\n\nnot Rough(ginny)\n\nnot Rough(ginny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The lizbeth form the lorette. The lorette does not visit the lizbeth. If something form the lorette then the lorette does not need the lizbeth. If something argue the lorette then the lorette does not see the lizbeth. If something form the lizbeth then the lizbeth argue the lorette. If the lorette does not need the lizbeth then the lizbeth argue the lorette. If the lizbeth argue the lorette then the lizbeth is burned. If the lorette does not see the lizbeth then the lizbeth is cometic. If something is unreduced and it solder the lorette then it does not visit the lizbeth. If something solder the lorette and it is not cometic then it solder the lizbeth. The lorette is cold.", "logic": "\nForm(lizbeth, lorette)\nnot Solder(lorette, lizbeth)\nforall x (Form(x, lorette) -> not Argue(lorette, lizbeth))\nforall x (Argue(x, lorette) -> not Form(lorette, lizbeth))\nforall x (Form(x, lizbeth) -> Argue(lizbeth, lorette))\nnot Argue(lorette, lizbeth) -> Argue(lizbeth, lorette)\nArgue(lizbeth, lorette) -> Burned(lizbeth)\nnot Form(lorette, lizbeth) -> Cometic(lizbeth)\nforall x (Unreduced(x) and Solder(x, lorette) -> not Solder(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Solder(x, lorette) and not Cometic(x) -> Solder(x, lizbeth))\n\nCold(lorette)\n\nCold(lorette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The jacynth detoxicate the reta. The reta does not visit the jacynth. If something detoxicate the reta then the reta does not need the jacynth. If something chouse the reta then the reta does not see the jacynth. If something detoxicate the jacynth then the jacynth chouse the reta. If the reta does not need the jacynth then the jacynth chouse the reta. If the jacynth chouse the reta then the jacynth is meshuga. If the reta does not see the jacynth then the jacynth is thousand. If something is monoicous and it misquote the reta then it does not visit the jacynth. If something misquote the reta and it is not thousand then it misquote the jacynth. The reta is not thousand.", "logic": "\nDetoxicate(jacynth, reta)\nnot Misquote(reta, jacynth)\nforall x (Detoxicate(x, reta) -> not Chouse(reta, jacynth))\nforall x (Chouse(x, reta) -> not Detoxicate(reta, jacynth))\nforall x (Detoxicate(x, jacynth) -> Chouse(jacynth, reta))\nnot Chouse(reta, jacynth) -> Chouse(jacynth, reta)\nChouse(jacynth, reta) -> Meshuga(jacynth)\nnot Detoxicate(reta, jacynth) -> Thousand(jacynth)\nforall x (Monoicous(x) and Misquote(x, reta) -> not Misquote(x, jacynth))\nforall x (Misquote(x, reta) and not Thousand(x) -> Misquote(x, jacynth))\n\nnot Thousand(reta)\n\nnot Thousand(reta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "The zeke fuel the josi. The josi does not visit the zeke. If something fuel the josi then the josi does not need the zeke. If something ransom the josi then the josi does not see the zeke. If something fuel the zeke then the zeke ransom the josi. If the josi does not need the zeke then the zeke ransom the josi. If the zeke ransom the josi then the zeke is shellproof. If the josi does not see the zeke then the zeke is passable. If something is affiliated and it become the josi then it does not visit the zeke. If something become the josi and it is not passable then it become the zeke. The zeke is cold.", "logic": "\nFuel(zeke, josi)\nnot Become(josi, zeke)\nforall x (Fuel(x, josi) -> not Ransom(josi, zeke))\nforall x (Ransom(x, josi) -> not Fuel(josi, zeke))\nforall x (Fuel(x, zeke) -> Ransom(zeke, josi))\nnot Ransom(josi, zeke) -> Ransom(zeke, josi)\nRansom(zeke, josi) -> Shellproof(zeke)\nnot Fuel(josi, zeke) -> Passable(zeke)\nforall x (Affiliated(x) and Become(x, josi) -> not Become(x, zeke))\nforall x (Become(x, josi) and not Passable(x) -> Become(x, zeke))\n\nCold(zeke)\n\nCold(zeke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-71"} {"premises": "Ruddy is auriculate. Merridie is butcherly. Lotty is boeotian. Teodor is behind. If something is butcherly then it is undulatory. If Merridie is undulatory then Merridie is boeotian. If something is auriculate then it is boeotian. Furry, behind things are auriculate. All auriculate things are behind. Blue things are disfigured. Ruddy is auriculate.", "logic": "\nAuriculate(ruddy)\nButcherly(merridie)\nBoeotian(lotty)\nBehind(teodor)\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Undulatory(x))\nUndulatory(merridie) -> Boeotian(merridie)\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Boeotian(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) and Behind(x) -> Auriculate(x))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Behind(x))\nforall x (Behind(x) -> Disfigured(x))\n\nAuriculate(ruddy)\n\ntherefore Auriculate(ruddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Humphrey is huddled. Valerie is drained. Babita is heliac. Sandra is balky. If something is drained then it is midmost. If Valerie is midmost then Valerie is heliac. If something is huddled then it is heliac. Furry, balky things are huddled. All huddled things are balky. Blue things are satyric. Humphrey is not huddled.", "logic": "\nHuddled(humphrey)\nDrained(valerie)\nHeliac(babita)\nBalky(sandra)\nforall x (Drained(x) -> Midmost(x))\nMidmost(valerie) -> Heliac(valerie)\nforall x (Huddled(x) -> Heliac(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) and Balky(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Huddled(x) -> Balky(x))\nforall x (Balky(x) -> Satyric(x))\n\nnot Huddled(humphrey)\n\ntherefore Huddled(humphrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Kimmo is demagogic. Wesley is unstarred. Simonne is nineteenth. Sergeant is hooflike. If something is unstarred then it is pronged. If Wesley is pronged then Wesley is nineteenth. If something is demagogic then it is nineteenth. Furry, hooflike things are demagogic. All demagogic things are hooflike. Blue things are assamese. Kimmo is nineteenth.", "logic": "\nDemagogic(kimmo)\nUnstarred(wesley)\nNineteenth(simonne)\nHooflike(sergeant)\nforall x (Unstarred(x) -> Pronged(x))\nPronged(wesley) -> Nineteenth(wesley)\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and Hooflike(x) -> Demagogic(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Hooflike(x))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) -> Assamese(x))\n\nNineteenth(kimmo)\n\nDemagogic(kimmo) and forall x (Demagogic(x) -> Nineteenth(x)) -> therefore Nineteenth(kimmo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Norris is flowing. Lorie is noisome. Isahella is numb. Candice is gusty. If something is noisome then it is unblended. If Lorie is unblended then Lorie is numb. If something is flowing then it is numb. Furry, gusty things are flowing. All flowing things are gusty. Blue things are precious. Norris is not gusty.", "logic": "\nFlowing(norris)\nNoisome(lorie)\nNumb(isahella)\nGusty(candice)\nforall x (Noisome(x) -> Unblended(x))\nUnblended(lorie) -> Numb(lorie)\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Noisome(x) and Gusty(x) -> Flowing(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Gusty(x))\nforall x (Gusty(x) -> Precious(x))\n\nnot Gusty(norris)\n\nFlowing(norris) and forall x (Flowing(x) -> Gusty(x)) -> therefore Gusty(norris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Alameda is precooked. Graeme is synchronic. Reece is unarguable. Harriott is gonzo. If something is synchronic then it is fortuitous. If Graeme is fortuitous then Graeme is unarguable. If something is precooked then it is unarguable. Furry, gonzo things are precooked. All precooked things are gonzo. Blue things are varicose. Alameda is varicose.", "logic": "\nPrecooked(alameda)\nSynchronic(graeme)\nUnarguable(reece)\nGonzo(harriott)\nforall x (Synchronic(x) -> Fortuitous(x))\nFortuitous(graeme) -> Unarguable(graeme)\nforall x (Precooked(x) -> Unarguable(x))\nforall x (Synchronic(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Precooked(x))\nforall x (Precooked(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) -> Varicose(x))\n\nVaricose(alameda)\n\nPrecooked(alameda) and forall x (Precooked(x) -> Gonzo(x)) -> therefore Gonzo(alameda) Gonzo(alameda) and forall x (Gonzo(x) -> Varicose(x)) -> therefore Varicose(alameda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Margit is bracted. Saba is untouched. Agretha is unifilar. Englebart is unkindly. If something is untouched then it is effluent. If Saba is effluent then Saba is unifilar. If something is bracted then it is unifilar. Furry, unkindly things are bracted. All bracted things are unkindly. Blue things are pleural. Saba is not unifilar.", "logic": "\nBracted(margit)\nUntouched(saba)\nUnifilar(agretha)\nUnkindly(englebart)\nforall x (Untouched(x) -> Effluent(x))\nEffluent(saba) -> Unifilar(saba)\nforall x (Bracted(x) -> Unifilar(x))\nforall x (Untouched(x) and Unkindly(x) -> Bracted(x))\nforall x (Bracted(x) -> Unkindly(x))\nforall x (Unkindly(x) -> Pleural(x))\n\nnot Unifilar(saba)\n\nUntouched(saba) and forall x (Untouched(x) -> Effluent(x)) -> therefore Effluent(saba) Effluent(saba) and Effluent(saba) -> Unifilar(saba) -> therefore Unifilar(saba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Vivian is neonatal. Kimberlee is systematic. Randall is fusible. Blithe is mantled. If something is systematic then it is amatory. If Kimberlee is amatory then Kimberlee is fusible. If something is neonatal then it is fusible. Furry, mantled things are neonatal. All neonatal things are mantled. Blue things are corned. Randall is not corned.", "logic": "\nNeonatal(vivian)\nSystematic(kimberlee)\nFusible(randall)\nMantled(blithe)\nforall x (Systematic(x) -> Amatory(x))\nAmatory(kimberlee) -> Fusible(kimberlee)\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Fusible(x))\nforall x (Systematic(x) and Mantled(x) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Mantled(x))\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Corned(x))\n\nnot Corned(randall)\n\nforall x (Mantled(x) -> Corned(x)) <- forall x (Neonatal(x) -> Mantled(x)) <- forall x (Systematic(x) and Mantled(x) -> Neonatal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Juliann is unassisted. Mika is unattired. Cora is touristed. Dana is curling. If something is unattired then it is neandertal. If Mika is neandertal then Mika is touristed. If something is unassisted then it is touristed. Furry, curling things are unassisted. All unassisted things are curling. Blue things are podgy. Cora is curling.", "logic": "\nUnassisted(juliann)\nUnattired(mika)\nTouristed(cora)\nCurling(dana)\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Neandertal(x))\nNeandertal(mika) -> Touristed(mika)\nforall x (Unassisted(x) -> Touristed(x))\nforall x (Unattired(x) and Curling(x) -> Unassisted(x))\nforall x (Unassisted(x) -> Curling(x))\nforall x (Curling(x) -> Podgy(x))\n\nCurling(cora)\n\nforall x (Unassisted(x) -> Curling(x)) <- forall x (Unattired(x) and Curling(x) -> Unassisted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Nataline is burly. Janene is augean. Mallory is organic. Bonnee is reduced. If something is augean then it is hindi. If Janene is hindi then Janene is organic. If something is burly then it is organic. Furry, reduced things are burly. All burly things are reduced. Blue things are lxxvi. Bonnee is not organic.", "logic": "\nBurly(nataline)\nAugean(janene)\nOrganic(mallory)\nReduced(bonnee)\nforall x (Augean(x) -> Hindi(x))\nHindi(janene) -> Organic(janene)\nforall x (Burly(x) -> Organic(x))\nforall x (Augean(x) and Reduced(x) -> Burly(x))\nforall x (Burly(x) -> Reduced(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\n\nnot Organic(bonnee)\n\nforall x (Burly(x) -> Organic(x)) <- forall x (Augean(x) and Reduced(x) -> Burly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Doris is bolivian. Wes is grizzled. Tally is heterodyne. Tiff is funicular. If something is grizzled then it is enduring. If Wes is enduring then Wes is heterodyne. If something is bolivian then it is heterodyne. Furry, funicular things are bolivian. All bolivian things are funicular. Blue things are postpartum. Tally is kind.", "logic": "\nBolivian(doris)\nGrizzled(wes)\nHeterodyne(tally)\nFunicular(tiff)\nforall x (Grizzled(x) -> Enduring(x))\nEnduring(wes) -> Heterodyne(wes)\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> Heterodyne(x))\nforall x (Grizzled(x) and Funicular(x) -> Bolivian(x))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> Funicular(x))\nforall x (Funicular(x) -> Postpartum(x))\n\nKind(tally)\n\nKind(tally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Ethelred is caprine. Teodor is spiffy. Channa is knowable. Sinclare is streaked. If something is spiffy then it is motorised. If Teodor is motorised then Teodor is knowable. If something is caprine then it is knowable. Furry, streaked things are caprine. All caprine things are streaked. Blue things are domestic. Ethelred is not kind.", "logic": "\nCaprine(ethelred)\nSpiffy(teodor)\nKnowable(channa)\nStreaked(sinclare)\nforall x (Spiffy(x) -> Motorised(x))\nMotorised(teodor) -> Knowable(teodor)\nforall x (Caprine(x) -> Knowable(x))\nforall x (Spiffy(x) and Streaked(x) -> Caprine(x))\nforall x (Caprine(x) -> Streaked(x))\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Domestic(x))\n\nnot Kind(ethelred)\n\nnot Kind(ethelred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "Susanetta is togolese. Stacy is frightened. Ilysa is toothless. Christ is addible. If something is frightened then it is bowlegged. If Stacy is bowlegged then Stacy is toothless. If something is togolese then it is toothless. Furry, addible things are togolese. All togolese things are addible. Blue things are sundried. Christ is frightened.", "logic": "\nTogolese(susanetta)\nFrightened(stacy)\nToothless(ilysa)\nAddible(christ)\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nBowlegged(stacy) -> Toothless(stacy)\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> Toothless(x))\nforall x (Frightened(x) and Addible(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> Addible(x))\nforall x (Addible(x) -> Sundried(x))\n\nFrightened(christ)\n\nFrightened(christ) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1266"} {"premises": "The torie is waxed. The dimitris tick the torie. If the dimitris rubric the torie and the dimitris is procumbent then the dimitris photograph the torie. If something photograph the torie and it is stupendous then the torie is mobbish. If something photograph the dimitris and the dimitris tick the torie then the torie rubric the dimitris. If something rubric the dimitris then the dimitris rubric the torie. If the torie is waxed then the torie photograph the dimitris. If something rubric the torie and it photograph the dimitris then it tick the dimitris. If the torie rubric the dimitris and the dimitris tick the torie then the dimitris rubric the torie. If something tick the torie then the torie is procumbent. The torie is waxed.", "logic": "\nWaxed(torie)\nTick(dimitris, torie)\nRubric(dimitris, torie) and Procumbent(dimitris) -> Photograph(dimitris, torie)\nforall x (Photograph(x, torie) and Stupendous(x) -> Mobbish(torie))\nforall x (Photograph(x, dimitris) and Tick(dimitris, torie) -> Rubric(torie, dimitris))\nforall x (Rubric(x, dimitris) -> Rubric(dimitris, torie))\nWaxed(torie) -> Photograph(torie, dimitris)\nforall x (Rubric(x, torie) and Photograph(x, dimitris) -> Tick(x, dimitris))\nRubric(torie, dimitris) and Tick(dimitris, torie) -> Rubric(dimitris, torie)\nforall x (Tick(x, torie) -> Procumbent(torie))\n\nWaxed(torie)\n\ntherefore Waxed(torie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The carlie is unspaced. The renaud inveigh the carlie. If the renaud smuggle the carlie and the renaud is traitorous then the renaud calk the carlie. If something calk the carlie and it is autotelic then the carlie is sensitised. If something calk the renaud and the renaud inveigh the carlie then the carlie smuggle the renaud. If something smuggle the renaud then the renaud smuggle the carlie. If the carlie is unspaced then the carlie calk the renaud. If something smuggle the carlie and it calk the renaud then it inveigh the renaud. If the carlie smuggle the renaud and the renaud inveigh the carlie then the renaud smuggle the carlie. If something inveigh the carlie then the carlie is traitorous. The carlie is not unspaced.", "logic": "\nUnspaced(carlie)\nInveigh(renaud, carlie)\nSmuggle(renaud, carlie) and Traitorous(renaud) -> Calk(renaud, carlie)\nforall x (Calk(x, carlie) and Autotelic(x) -> Sensitised(carlie))\nforall x (Calk(x, renaud) and Inveigh(renaud, carlie) -> Smuggle(carlie, renaud))\nforall x (Smuggle(x, renaud) -> Smuggle(renaud, carlie))\nUnspaced(carlie) -> Calk(carlie, renaud)\nforall x (Smuggle(x, carlie) and Calk(x, renaud) -> Inveigh(x, renaud))\nSmuggle(carlie, renaud) and Inveigh(renaud, carlie) -> Smuggle(renaud, carlie)\nforall x (Inveigh(x, carlie) -> Traitorous(carlie))\n\nnot Unspaced(carlie)\n\ntherefore Unspaced(carlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The morley is indusial. The natasha upheave the morley. If the natasha bale the morley and the natasha is wrenching then the natasha embarrass the morley. If something embarrass the morley and it is trapped then the morley is profound. If something embarrass the natasha and the natasha upheave the morley then the morley bale the natasha. If something bale the natasha then the natasha bale the morley. If the morley is indusial then the morley embarrass the natasha. If something bale the morley and it embarrass the natasha then it upheave the natasha. If the morley bale the natasha and the natasha upheave the morley then the natasha bale the morley. If something upheave the morley then the morley is wrenching. The morley embarrass the natasha.", "logic": "\nIndusial(morley)\nUpheave(natasha, morley)\nBale(natasha, morley) and Wrenching(natasha) -> Embarrass(natasha, morley)\nforall x (Embarrass(x, morley) and Trapped(x) -> Profound(morley))\nforall x (Embarrass(x, natasha) and Upheave(natasha, morley) -> Bale(morley, natasha))\nforall x (Bale(x, natasha) -> Bale(natasha, morley))\nIndusial(morley) -> Embarrass(morley, natasha)\nforall x (Bale(x, morley) and Embarrass(x, natasha) -> Upheave(x, natasha))\nBale(morley, natasha) and Upheave(natasha, morley) -> Bale(natasha, morley)\nforall x (Upheave(x, morley) -> Wrenching(morley))\n\nEmbarrass(morley, natasha)\n\nIndusial(morley) and Indusial(morley) -> Embarrass(morley, natasha) -> therefore Embarrass(morley, natasha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The nevile is corbelled. The halie signalise the nevile. If the halie coronate the nevile and the halie is stoneless then the halie intoxicate the nevile. If something intoxicate the nevile and it is disruptive then the nevile is alkaloidal. If something intoxicate the halie and the halie signalise the nevile then the nevile coronate the halie. If something coronate the halie then the halie coronate the nevile. If the nevile is corbelled then the nevile intoxicate the halie. If something coronate the nevile and it intoxicate the halie then it signalise the halie. If the nevile coronate the halie and the halie signalise the nevile then the halie coronate the nevile. If something signalise the nevile then the nevile is stoneless. The nevile does not like the halie.", "logic": "\nCorbelled(nevile)\nSignalise(halie, nevile)\nCoronate(halie, nevile) and Stoneless(halie) -> Intoxicate(halie, nevile)\nforall x (Intoxicate(x, nevile) and Disruptive(x) -> Alkaloidal(nevile))\nforall x (Intoxicate(x, halie) and Signalise(halie, nevile) -> Coronate(nevile, halie))\nforall x (Coronate(x, halie) -> Coronate(halie, nevile))\nCorbelled(nevile) -> Intoxicate(nevile, halie)\nforall x (Coronate(x, nevile) and Intoxicate(x, halie) -> Signalise(x, halie))\nCoronate(nevile, halie) and Signalise(halie, nevile) -> Coronate(halie, nevile)\nforall x (Signalise(x, nevile) -> Stoneless(nevile))\n\nnot Intoxicate(nevile, halie)\n\nCorbelled(nevile) and Corbelled(nevile) -> Intoxicate(nevile, halie) -> therefore Intoxicate(nevile, halie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The angelia is anomalous. The delphinia inveigh the angelia. If the delphinia pinkify the angelia and the delphinia is crack then the delphinia cybernate the angelia. If something cybernate the angelia and it is mesodermal then the angelia is squeezable. If something cybernate the delphinia and the delphinia inveigh the angelia then the angelia pinkify the delphinia. If something pinkify the delphinia then the delphinia pinkify the angelia. If the angelia is anomalous then the angelia cybernate the delphinia. If something pinkify the angelia and it cybernate the delphinia then it inveigh the delphinia. If the angelia pinkify the delphinia and the delphinia inveigh the angelia then the delphinia pinkify the angelia. If something inveigh the angelia then the angelia is crack. The angelia pinkify the delphinia.", "logic": "\nAnomalous(angelia)\nInveigh(delphinia, angelia)\nPinkify(delphinia, angelia) and Crack(delphinia) -> Cybernate(delphinia, angelia)\nforall x (Cybernate(x, angelia) and Mesodermal(x) -> Squeezable(angelia))\nforall x (Cybernate(x, delphinia) and Inveigh(delphinia, angelia) -> Pinkify(angelia, delphinia))\nforall x (Pinkify(x, delphinia) -> Pinkify(delphinia, angelia))\nAnomalous(angelia) -> Cybernate(angelia, delphinia)\nforall x (Pinkify(x, angelia) and Cybernate(x, delphinia) -> Inveigh(x, delphinia))\nPinkify(angelia, delphinia) and Inveigh(delphinia, angelia) -> Pinkify(delphinia, angelia)\nforall x (Inveigh(x, angelia) -> Crack(angelia))\n\nPinkify(angelia, delphinia)\n\nAnomalous(angelia) and Anomalous(angelia) -> Cybernate(angelia, delphinia) -> therefore Cybernate(angelia, delphinia) Cybernate(angelia, delphinia) and Inveigh(delphinia, angelia) and forall x (Cybernate(x, delphinia) and Inveigh(delphinia, angelia) -> Pinkify(angelia, delphinia)) -> therefore Pinkify(angelia, delphinia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The jerzy is lusitanian. The felita conform the jerzy. If the felita smell the jerzy and the felita is compressed then the felita ward the jerzy. If something ward the jerzy and it is britannic then the jerzy is blurry. If something ward the felita and the felita conform the jerzy then the jerzy smell the felita. If something smell the felita then the felita smell the jerzy. If the jerzy is lusitanian then the jerzy ward the felita. If something smell the jerzy and it ward the felita then it conform the felita. If the jerzy smell the felita and the felita conform the jerzy then the felita smell the jerzy. If something conform the jerzy then the jerzy is compressed. The jerzy does not need the felita.", "logic": "\nLusitanian(jerzy)\nConform(felita, jerzy)\nSmell(felita, jerzy) and Compressed(felita) -> Ward(felita, jerzy)\nforall x (Ward(x, jerzy) and Britannic(x) -> Blurry(jerzy))\nforall x (Ward(x, felita) and Conform(felita, jerzy) -> Smell(jerzy, felita))\nforall x (Smell(x, felita) -> Smell(felita, jerzy))\nLusitanian(jerzy) -> Ward(jerzy, felita)\nforall x (Smell(x, jerzy) and Ward(x, felita) -> Conform(x, felita))\nSmell(jerzy, felita) and Conform(felita, jerzy) -> Smell(felita, jerzy)\nforall x (Conform(x, jerzy) -> Compressed(jerzy))\n\nnot Smell(jerzy, felita)\n\nLusitanian(jerzy) and Lusitanian(jerzy) -> Ward(jerzy, felita) -> therefore Ward(jerzy, felita) Ward(jerzy, felita) and Conform(felita, jerzy) and forall x (Ward(x, felita) and Conform(felita, jerzy) -> Smell(jerzy, felita)) -> therefore Smell(jerzy, felita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The candy is vigesimal. The ursula misquote the candy. If the ursula domineer the candy and the ursula is technical then the ursula centre the candy. If something centre the candy and it is conjugal then the candy is gritty. If something centre the ursula and the ursula misquote the candy then the candy domineer the ursula. If something domineer the ursula then the ursula domineer the candy. If the candy is vigesimal then the candy centre the ursula. If something domineer the candy and it centre the ursula then it misquote the ursula. If the candy domineer the ursula and the ursula misquote the candy then the ursula domineer the candy. If something misquote the candy then the candy is technical. The ursula domineer the candy.", "logic": "\nVigesimal(candy)\nMisquote(ursula, candy)\nDomineer(ursula, candy) and Technical(ursula) -> Centre(ursula, candy)\nforall x (Centre(x, candy) and Conjugal(x) -> Gritty(candy))\nforall x (Centre(x, ursula) and Misquote(ursula, candy) -> Domineer(candy, ursula))\nforall x (Domineer(x, ursula) -> Domineer(ursula, candy))\nVigesimal(candy) -> Centre(candy, ursula)\nforall x (Domineer(x, candy) and Centre(x, ursula) -> Misquote(x, ursula))\nDomineer(candy, ursula) and Misquote(ursula, candy) -> Domineer(ursula, candy)\nforall x (Misquote(x, candy) -> Technical(candy))\n\nDomineer(ursula, candy)\n\nVigesimal(candy) and Vigesimal(candy) -> Centre(candy, ursula) -> therefore Centre(candy, ursula) Centre(candy, ursula) and Misquote(ursula, candy) and forall x (Centre(x, ursula) and Misquote(ursula, candy) -> Domineer(candy, ursula)) -> therefore Domineer(candy, ursula) Domineer(candy, ursula) and forall x (Domineer(x, ursula) -> Domineer(ursula, candy)) -> therefore Domineer(ursula, candy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The pier is diazo. The baxter unloosen the pier. If the baxter rubberise the pier and the baxter is ecologic then the baxter summate the pier. If something summate the pier and it is sulphurous then the pier is linnean. If something summate the baxter and the baxter unloosen the pier then the pier rubberise the baxter. If something rubberise the baxter then the baxter rubberise the pier. If the pier is diazo then the pier summate the baxter. If something rubberise the pier and it summate the baxter then it unloosen the baxter. If the pier rubberise the baxter and the baxter unloosen the pier then the baxter rubberise the pier. If something unloosen the pier then the pier is ecologic. The baxter does not need the pier.", "logic": "\nDiazo(pier)\nUnloosen(baxter, pier)\nRubberise(baxter, pier) and Ecologic(baxter) -> Summate(baxter, pier)\nforall x (Summate(x, pier) and Sulphurous(x) -> Linnean(pier))\nforall x (Summate(x, baxter) and Unloosen(baxter, pier) -> Rubberise(pier, baxter))\nforall x (Rubberise(x, baxter) -> Rubberise(baxter, pier))\nDiazo(pier) -> Summate(pier, baxter)\nforall x (Rubberise(x, pier) and Summate(x, baxter) -> Unloosen(x, baxter))\nRubberise(pier, baxter) and Unloosen(baxter, pier) -> Rubberise(baxter, pier)\nforall x (Unloosen(x, pier) -> Ecologic(pier))\n\nnot Rubberise(baxter, pier)\n\nDiazo(pier) and Diazo(pier) -> Summate(pier, baxter) -> therefore Summate(pier, baxter) Summate(pier, baxter) and Unloosen(baxter, pier) and forall x (Summate(x, baxter) and Unloosen(baxter, pier) -> Rubberise(pier, baxter)) -> therefore Rubberise(pier, baxter) Rubberise(pier, baxter) and forall x (Rubberise(x, baxter) -> Rubberise(baxter, pier)) -> therefore Rubberise(baxter, pier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The lazarus is petulant. The parker covenant the lazarus. If the parker fart the lazarus and the parker is fewest then the parker operate the lazarus. If something operate the lazarus and it is blackish then the lazarus is glomerular. If something operate the parker and the parker covenant the lazarus then the lazarus fart the parker. If something fart the parker then the parker fart the lazarus. If the lazarus is petulant then the lazarus operate the parker. If something fart the lazarus and it operate the parker then it covenant the parker. If the lazarus fart the parker and the parker covenant the lazarus then the parker fart the lazarus. If something covenant the lazarus then the lazarus is fewest. The lazarus does not eat the parker.", "logic": "\nPetulant(lazarus)\nCovenant(parker, lazarus)\nFart(parker, lazarus) and Fewest(parker) -> Operate(parker, lazarus)\nforall x (Operate(x, lazarus) and Blackish(x) -> Glomerular(lazarus))\nforall x (Operate(x, parker) and Covenant(parker, lazarus) -> Fart(lazarus, parker))\nforall x (Fart(x, parker) -> Fart(parker, lazarus))\nPetulant(lazarus) -> Operate(lazarus, parker)\nforall x (Fart(x, lazarus) and Operate(x, parker) -> Covenant(x, parker))\nFart(lazarus, parker) and Covenant(parker, lazarus) -> Fart(parker, lazarus)\nforall x (Covenant(x, lazarus) -> Fewest(lazarus))\n\nnot Covenant(lazarus, parker)\n\nforall x (Fart(x, lazarus) and Operate(x, parker) -> Covenant(x, parker)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The byram is untempting. The desirae idealize the byram. If the desirae ring the byram and the desirae is arillate then the desirae berate the byram. If something berate the byram and it is undersize then the byram is fibrous. If something berate the desirae and the desirae idealize the byram then the byram ring the desirae. If something ring the desirae then the desirae ring the byram. If the byram is untempting then the byram berate the desirae. If something ring the byram and it berate the desirae then it idealize the desirae. If the byram ring the desirae and the desirae idealize the byram then the desirae ring the byram. If something idealize the byram then the byram is arillate. The desirae idealize the desirae.", "logic": "\nUntempting(byram)\nIdealize(desirae, byram)\nRing(desirae, byram) and Arillate(desirae) -> Berate(desirae, byram)\nforall x (Berate(x, byram) and Undersize(x) -> Fibrous(byram))\nforall x (Berate(x, desirae) and Idealize(desirae, byram) -> Ring(byram, desirae))\nforall x (Ring(x, desirae) -> Ring(desirae, byram))\nUntempting(byram) -> Berate(byram, desirae)\nforall x (Ring(x, byram) and Berate(x, desirae) -> Idealize(x, desirae))\nRing(byram, desirae) and Idealize(desirae, byram) -> Ring(desirae, byram)\nforall x (Idealize(x, byram) -> Arillate(byram))\n\nIdealize(desirae, desirae)\n\nforall x (Ring(x, byram) and Berate(x, desirae) -> Idealize(x, desirae)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The thor is squawky. The wynton synthesize the thor. If the wynton resorb the thor and the wynton is dated then the wynton rearrange the thor. If something rearrange the thor and it is antinomian then the thor is limp. If something rearrange the wynton and the wynton synthesize the thor then the thor resorb the wynton. If something resorb the wynton then the wynton resorb the thor. If the thor is squawky then the thor rearrange the wynton. If something resorb the thor and it rearrange the wynton then it synthesize the wynton. If the thor resorb the wynton and the wynton synthesize the thor then the wynton resorb the thor. If something synthesize the thor then the thor is dated. The wynton does not like the thor.", "logic": "\nSquawky(thor)\nSynthesize(wynton, thor)\nResorb(wynton, thor) and Dated(wynton) -> Rearrange(wynton, thor)\nforall x (Rearrange(x, thor) and Antinomian(x) -> Limp(thor))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, wynton) and Synthesize(wynton, thor) -> Resorb(thor, wynton))\nforall x (Resorb(x, wynton) -> Resorb(wynton, thor))\nSquawky(thor) -> Rearrange(thor, wynton)\nforall x (Resorb(x, thor) and Rearrange(x, wynton) -> Synthesize(x, wynton))\nResorb(thor, wynton) and Synthesize(wynton, thor) -> Resorb(wynton, thor)\nforall x (Synthesize(x, thor) -> Dated(thor))\n\nnot Rearrange(wynton, thor)\n\nResorb(wynton, thor) and Dated(wynton) -> Rearrange(wynton, thor) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The rianon is unifoliate. The shandra frazzle the rianon. If the shandra ligate the rianon and the shandra is translunar then the shandra champion the rianon. If something champion the rianon and it is papistical then the rianon is married. If something champion the shandra and the shandra frazzle the rianon then the rianon ligate the shandra. If something ligate the shandra then the shandra ligate the rianon. If the rianon is unifoliate then the rianon champion the shandra. If something ligate the rianon and it champion the shandra then it frazzle the shandra. If the rianon ligate the shandra and the shandra frazzle the rianon then the shandra ligate the rianon. If something frazzle the rianon then the rianon is translunar. The rianon is married.", "logic": "\nUnifoliate(rianon)\nFrazzle(shandra, rianon)\nLigate(shandra, rianon) and Translunar(shandra) -> Champion(shandra, rianon)\nforall x (Champion(x, rianon) and Papistical(x) -> Married(rianon))\nforall x (Champion(x, shandra) and Frazzle(shandra, rianon) -> Ligate(rianon, shandra))\nforall x (Ligate(x, shandra) -> Ligate(shandra, rianon))\nUnifoliate(rianon) -> Champion(rianon, shandra)\nforall x (Ligate(x, rianon) and Champion(x, shandra) -> Frazzle(x, shandra))\nLigate(rianon, shandra) and Frazzle(shandra, rianon) -> Ligate(shandra, rianon)\nforall x (Frazzle(x, rianon) -> Translunar(rianon))\n\nMarried(rianon)\n\nforall x (Champion(x, rianon) and Papistical(x) -> Married(rianon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The rebecka is roiling. The nissie tread the rebecka. If the nissie enclose the rebecka and the nissie is awing then the nissie candle the rebecka. If something candle the rebecka and it is clonal then the rebecka is fastigiate. If something candle the nissie and the nissie tread the rebecka then the rebecka enclose the nissie. If something enclose the nissie then the nissie enclose the rebecka. If the rebecka is roiling then the rebecka candle the nissie. If something enclose the rebecka and it candle the nissie then it tread the nissie. If the rebecka enclose the nissie and the nissie tread the rebecka then the nissie enclose the rebecka. If something tread the rebecka then the rebecka is awing. The nissie is not awing.", "logic": "\nRoiling(rebecka)\nTread(nissie, rebecka)\nEnclose(nissie, rebecka) and Awing(nissie) -> Candle(nissie, rebecka)\nforall x (Candle(x, rebecka) and Clonal(x) -> Fastigiate(rebecka))\nforall x (Candle(x, nissie) and Tread(nissie, rebecka) -> Enclose(rebecka, nissie))\nforall x (Enclose(x, nissie) -> Enclose(nissie, rebecka))\nRoiling(rebecka) -> Candle(rebecka, nissie)\nforall x (Enclose(x, rebecka) and Candle(x, nissie) -> Tread(x, nissie))\nEnclose(rebecka, nissie) and Tread(nissie, rebecka) -> Enclose(nissie, rebecka)\nforall x (Tread(x, rebecka) -> Awing(rebecka))\n\nnot Awing(nissie)\n\nnot Awing(nissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The jeremias is gibbose. The cleo crouch the jeremias. If the cleo thicken the jeremias and the cleo is walloping then the cleo arise the jeremias. If something arise the jeremias and it is multilane then the jeremias is surly. If something arise the cleo and the cleo crouch the jeremias then the jeremias thicken the cleo. If something thicken the cleo then the cleo thicken the jeremias. If the jeremias is gibbose then the jeremias arise the cleo. If something thicken the jeremias and it arise the cleo then it crouch the cleo. If the jeremias thicken the cleo and the cleo crouch the jeremias then the cleo thicken the jeremias. If something crouch the jeremias then the jeremias is walloping. The jeremias is nice.", "logic": "\nGibbose(jeremias)\nCrouch(cleo, jeremias)\nThicken(cleo, jeremias) and Walloping(cleo) -> Arise(cleo, jeremias)\nforall x (Arise(x, jeremias) and Multilane(x) -> Surly(jeremias))\nforall x (Arise(x, cleo) and Crouch(cleo, jeremias) -> Thicken(jeremias, cleo))\nforall x (Thicken(x, cleo) -> Thicken(cleo, jeremias))\nGibbose(jeremias) -> Arise(jeremias, cleo)\nforall x (Thicken(x, jeremias) and Arise(x, cleo) -> Crouch(x, cleo))\nThicken(jeremias, cleo) and Crouch(cleo, jeremias) -> Thicken(cleo, jeremias)\nforall x (Crouch(x, jeremias) -> Walloping(jeremias))\n\nNice(jeremias)\n\nNice(jeremias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The lilias is tunisian. The lianne deal the lilias. If the lianne dazzle the lilias and the lianne is fashioned then the lianne deflower the lilias. If something deflower the lilias and it is trancelike then the lilias is moony. If something deflower the lianne and the lianne deal the lilias then the lilias dazzle the lianne. If something dazzle the lianne then the lianne dazzle the lilias. If the lilias is tunisian then the lilias deflower the lianne. If something dazzle the lilias and it deflower the lianne then it deal the lianne. If the lilias dazzle the lianne and the lianne deal the lilias then the lianne dazzle the lilias. If something deal the lilias then the lilias is fashioned. The lilias does not need the lilias.", "logic": "\nTunisian(lilias)\nDeal(lianne, lilias)\nDazzle(lianne, lilias) and Fashioned(lianne) -> Deflower(lianne, lilias)\nforall x (Deflower(x, lilias) and Trancelike(x) -> Moony(lilias))\nforall x (Deflower(x, lianne) and Deal(lianne, lilias) -> Dazzle(lilias, lianne))\nforall x (Dazzle(x, lianne) -> Dazzle(lianne, lilias))\nTunisian(lilias) -> Deflower(lilias, lianne)\nforall x (Dazzle(x, lilias) and Deflower(x, lianne) -> Deal(x, lianne))\nDazzle(lilias, lianne) and Deal(lianne, lilias) -> Dazzle(lianne, lilias)\nforall x (Deal(x, lilias) -> Fashioned(lilias))\n\nnot Dazzle(lilias, lilias)\n\nnot Dazzle(lilias, lilias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "The berrie is perfoliate. The poul demobilise the berrie. If the poul dose the berrie and the poul is adaptable then the poul solidify the berrie. If something solidify the berrie and it is parted then the berrie is dead. If something solidify the poul and the poul demobilise the berrie then the berrie dose the poul. If something dose the poul then the poul dose the berrie. If the berrie is perfoliate then the berrie solidify the poul. If something dose the berrie and it solidify the poul then it demobilise the poul. If the berrie dose the poul and the poul demobilise the berrie then the poul dose the berrie. If something demobilise the berrie then the berrie is adaptable. The poul is nice.", "logic": "\nPerfoliate(berrie)\nDemobilise(poul, berrie)\nDose(poul, berrie) and Adaptable(poul) -> Solidify(poul, berrie)\nforall x (Solidify(x, berrie) and Parted(x) -> Dead(berrie))\nforall x (Solidify(x, poul) and Demobilise(poul, berrie) -> Dose(berrie, poul))\nforall x (Dose(x, poul) -> Dose(poul, berrie))\nPerfoliate(berrie) -> Solidify(berrie, poul)\nforall x (Dose(x, berrie) and Solidify(x, poul) -> Demobilise(x, poul))\nDose(berrie, poul) and Demobilise(poul, berrie) -> Dose(poul, berrie)\nforall x (Demobilise(x, berrie) -> Adaptable(berrie))\n\nNice(poul)\n\nNice(poul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-243"} {"premises": "Bradly is petaled. Bradly is not cenobitic. Bradly is blown. Gaynor is straight. Gaynor is cenobitic. Gaynor is blown. Gaynor is immotile. Fania is cenobitic. Barnabe is disputable. Barnabe is blown. Young things are cenobitic. All disputable things are cenobitic. Smart, petaled things are not cenobitic. All cenobitic things are blown. If something is petaled and immotile then it is straight. Quiet things are straight. If something is lean and blown then it is petaled. If something is lean then it is not immotile. Barnabe is blown.", "logic": "\nPetaled(bradly)\nnot Cenobitic(bradly)\nBlown(bradly)\nStraight(gaynor)\nCenobitic(gaynor)\nBlown(gaynor)\nImmotile(gaynor)\nCenobitic(fania)\nDisputable(barnabe)\nBlown(barnabe)\nforall x (Lean(x) -> Cenobitic(x))\nforall x (Disputable(x) -> Cenobitic(x))\nforall x (Immotile(x) and Petaled(x) -> not Cenobitic(x))\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Blown(x))\nforall x (Petaled(x) and Immotile(x) -> Straight(x))\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Straight(x))\nforall x (Lean(x) and Blown(x) -> Petaled(x))\nforall x (Lean(x) -> not Immotile(x))\n\nBlown(barnabe)\n\ntherefore Blown(barnabe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Liora is unschooled. Liora is not secretory. Liora is unsuasible. Winonah is onside. Winonah is secretory. Winonah is unsuasible. Winonah is rampageous. Virginie is secretory. Cayla is maggoty. Cayla is unsuasible. Young things are secretory. All maggoty things are secretory. Smart, unschooled things are not secretory. All secretory things are unsuasible. If something is unschooled and rampageous then it is onside. Quiet things are onside. If something is unsolvable and unsuasible then it is unschooled. If something is unsolvable then it is not rampageous. Liora is not unsuasible.", "logic": "\nUnschooled(liora)\nnot Secretory(liora)\nUnsuasible(liora)\nOnside(winonah)\nSecretory(winonah)\nUnsuasible(winonah)\nRampageous(winonah)\nSecretory(virginie)\nMaggoty(cayla)\nUnsuasible(cayla)\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Maggoty(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Rampageous(x) and Unschooled(x) -> not Secretory(x))\nforall x (Secretory(x) -> Unsuasible(x))\nforall x (Unschooled(x) and Rampageous(x) -> Onside(x))\nforall x (Secretory(x) -> Onside(x))\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) and Unsuasible(x) -> Unschooled(x))\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) -> not Rampageous(x))\n\nnot Unsuasible(liora)\n\ntherefore Unsuasible(liora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Ashby is raped. Ashby is not acerate. Ashby is sprightly. Marilu is harmonical. Marilu is acerate. Marilu is sprightly. Marilu is ceramic. Helge is acerate. Max is meaningful. Max is sprightly. Young things are acerate. All meaningful things are acerate. Smart, raped things are not acerate. All acerate things are sprightly. If something is raped and ceramic then it is harmonical. Quiet things are harmonical. If something is snide and sprightly then it is raped. If something is snide then it is not ceramic. Helge is harmonical.", "logic": "\nRaped(ashby)\nnot Acerate(ashby)\nSprightly(ashby)\nHarmonical(marilu)\nAcerate(marilu)\nSprightly(marilu)\nCeramic(marilu)\nAcerate(helge)\nMeaningful(max)\nSprightly(max)\nforall x (Snide(x) -> Acerate(x))\nforall x (Meaningful(x) -> Acerate(x))\nforall x (Ceramic(x) and Raped(x) -> not Acerate(x))\nforall x (Acerate(x) -> Sprightly(x))\nforall x (Raped(x) and Ceramic(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Acerate(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Snide(x) and Sprightly(x) -> Raped(x))\nforall x (Snide(x) -> not Ceramic(x))\n\nHarmonical(helge)\n\nAcerate(helge) and forall x (Acerate(x) -> Harmonical(x)) -> therefore Harmonical(helge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Sammy is unbiassed. Sammy is not urgent. Sammy is lovesome. Archibold is astral. Archibold is urgent. Archibold is lovesome. Archibold is raucous. Aili is urgent. Martynne is pandemic. Martynne is lovesome. Young things are urgent. All pandemic things are urgent. Smart, unbiassed things are not urgent. All urgent things are lovesome. If something is unbiassed and raucous then it is astral. Quiet things are astral. If something is blown and lovesome then it is unbiassed. If something is blown then it is not raucous. Aili is not lovesome.", "logic": "\nUnbiassed(sammy)\nnot Urgent(sammy)\nLovesome(sammy)\nAstral(archibold)\nUrgent(archibold)\nLovesome(archibold)\nRaucous(archibold)\nUrgent(aili)\nPandemic(martynne)\nLovesome(martynne)\nforall x (Blown(x) -> Urgent(x))\nforall x (Pandemic(x) -> Urgent(x))\nforall x (Raucous(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> not Urgent(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Raucous(x) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Blown(x) and Lovesome(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Blown(x) -> not Raucous(x))\n\nnot Lovesome(aili)\n\nUrgent(aili) and forall x (Urgent(x) -> Lovesome(x)) -> therefore Lovesome(aili)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Magda is lone. Magda is not tatty. Magda is braided. Noellyn is chipper. Noellyn is tatty. Noellyn is braided. Noellyn is pesky. Corine is tatty. Darsey is papillary. Darsey is braided. Young things are tatty. All papillary things are tatty. Smart, lone things are not tatty. All tatty things are braided. If something is lone and pesky then it is chipper. Quiet things are chipper. If something is hurrying and braided then it is lone. If something is hurrying then it is not pesky. Darsey is chipper.", "logic": "\nLone(magda)\nnot Tatty(magda)\nBraided(magda)\nChipper(noellyn)\nTatty(noellyn)\nBraided(noellyn)\nPesky(noellyn)\nTatty(corine)\nPapillary(darsey)\nBraided(darsey)\nforall x (Hurrying(x) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Papillary(x) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Pesky(x) and Lone(x) -> not Tatty(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Lone(x) and Pesky(x) -> Chipper(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) -> Chipper(x))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) and Braided(x) -> Lone(x))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) -> not Pesky(x))\n\nChipper(darsey)\n\nPapillary(darsey) and forall x (Papillary(x) -> Tatty(x)) -> therefore Tatty(darsey) Tatty(darsey) and forall x (Tatty(x) -> Chipper(x)) -> therefore Chipper(darsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Ethelin is proven. Ethelin is not verifiable. Ethelin is inguinal. Cilka is unkind. Cilka is verifiable. Cilka is inguinal. Cilka is podlike. Nigel is verifiable. Steffie is lissom. Steffie is inguinal. Young things are verifiable. All lissom things are verifiable. Smart, proven things are not verifiable. All verifiable things are inguinal. If something is proven and podlike then it is unkind. Quiet things are unkind. If something is banging and inguinal then it is proven. If something is banging then it is not podlike. Steffie is not unkind.", "logic": "\nProven(ethelin)\nnot Verifiable(ethelin)\nInguinal(ethelin)\nUnkind(cilka)\nVerifiable(cilka)\nInguinal(cilka)\nPodlike(cilka)\nVerifiable(nigel)\nLissom(steffie)\nInguinal(steffie)\nforall x (Banging(x) -> Verifiable(x))\nforall x (Lissom(x) -> Verifiable(x))\nforall x (Podlike(x) and Proven(x) -> not Verifiable(x))\nforall x (Verifiable(x) -> Inguinal(x))\nforall x (Proven(x) and Podlike(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Verifiable(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Banging(x) and Inguinal(x) -> Proven(x))\nforall x (Banging(x) -> not Podlike(x))\n\nnot Unkind(steffie)\n\nLissom(steffie) and forall x (Lissom(x) -> Verifiable(x)) -> therefore Verifiable(steffie) Verifiable(steffie) and forall x (Verifiable(x) -> Unkind(x)) -> therefore Unkind(steffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Aharon is svelte. Aharon is not nonvisual. Aharon is subduable. Alecia is illogical. Alecia is nonvisual. Alecia is subduable. Alecia is squalid. Liora is nonvisual. Janet is purging. Janet is subduable. Young things are nonvisual. All purging things are nonvisual. Smart, svelte things are not nonvisual. All nonvisual things are subduable. If something is svelte and squalid then it is illogical. Quiet things are illogical. If something is underfed and subduable then it is svelte. If something is underfed then it is not squalid. Liora is not svelte.", "logic": "\nSvelte(aharon)\nnot Nonvisual(aharon)\nSubduable(aharon)\nIllogical(alecia)\nNonvisual(alecia)\nSubduable(alecia)\nSqualid(alecia)\nNonvisual(liora)\nPurging(janet)\nSubduable(janet)\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\nforall x (Squalid(x) and Svelte(x) -> not Nonvisual(x))\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) -> Subduable(x))\nforall x (Svelte(x) and Squalid(x) -> Illogical(x))\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) -> Illogical(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) and Subduable(x) -> Svelte(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> not Squalid(x))\n\nnot Svelte(liora)\n\nforall x (Underfed(x) and Subduable(x) -> Svelte(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Hewitt is tegular. Hewitt is not clonal. Hewitt is elapsed. Rosemary is corrupted. Rosemary is clonal. Rosemary is elapsed. Rosemary is steely. Pascal is clonal. Emmalynn is tribal. Emmalynn is elapsed. Young things are clonal. All tribal things are clonal. Smart, tegular things are not clonal. All clonal things are elapsed. If something is tegular and steely then it is corrupted. Quiet things are corrupted. If something is contented and elapsed then it is tegular. If something is contented then it is not steely. Emmalynn is tegular.", "logic": "\nTegular(hewitt)\nnot Clonal(hewitt)\nElapsed(hewitt)\nCorrupted(rosemary)\nClonal(rosemary)\nElapsed(rosemary)\nSteely(rosemary)\nClonal(pascal)\nTribal(emmalynn)\nElapsed(emmalynn)\nforall x (Contented(x) -> Clonal(x))\nforall x (Tribal(x) -> Clonal(x))\nforall x (Steely(x) and Tegular(x) -> not Clonal(x))\nforall x (Clonal(x) -> Elapsed(x))\nforall x (Tegular(x) and Steely(x) -> Corrupted(x))\nforall x (Clonal(x) -> Corrupted(x))\nforall x (Contented(x) and Elapsed(x) -> Tegular(x))\nforall x (Contented(x) -> not Steely(x))\n\nTegular(emmalynn)\n\nforall x (Contented(x) and Elapsed(x) -> Tegular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Barbra is congenital. Barbra is not sensory. Barbra is savoury. Alana is corinthian. Alana is sensory. Alana is savoury. Alana is unplaced. Wenonah is sensory. Lynette is uninviting. Lynette is savoury. Young things are sensory. All uninviting things are sensory. Smart, congenital things are not sensory. All sensory things are savoury. If something is congenital and unplaced then it is corinthian. Quiet things are corinthian. If something is nude and savoury then it is congenital. If something is nude then it is not unplaced. Barbra is not corinthian.", "logic": "\nCongenital(barbra)\nnot Sensory(barbra)\nSavoury(barbra)\nCorinthian(alana)\nSensory(alana)\nSavoury(alana)\nUnplaced(alana)\nSensory(wenonah)\nUninviting(lynette)\nSavoury(lynette)\nforall x (Nude(x) -> Sensory(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> Sensory(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) and Congenital(x) -> not Sensory(x))\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Savoury(x))\nforall x (Congenital(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Nude(x) and Savoury(x) -> Congenital(x))\nforall x (Nude(x) -> not Unplaced(x))\n\nnot Corinthian(barbra)\n\nforall x (Congenital(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Corinthian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Laurent is inquiring. Laurent is not exorbitant. Laurent is passee. Igor is bulblike. Igor is exorbitant. Igor is passee. Igor is iterative. Eliot is exorbitant. Daisy is ginger. Daisy is passee. Young things are exorbitant. All ginger things are exorbitant. Smart, inquiring things are not exorbitant. All exorbitant things are passee. If something is inquiring and iterative then it is bulblike. Quiet things are bulblike. If something is flecked and passee then it is inquiring. If something is flecked then it is not iterative. Igor is ginger.", "logic": "\nInquiring(laurent)\nnot Exorbitant(laurent)\nPassee(laurent)\nBulblike(igor)\nExorbitant(igor)\nPassee(igor)\nIterative(igor)\nExorbitant(eliot)\nGinger(daisy)\nPassee(daisy)\nforall x (Flecked(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Ginger(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Inquiring(x) -> not Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Passee(x))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) and Iterative(x) -> Bulblike(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Bulblike(x))\nforall x (Flecked(x) and Passee(x) -> Inquiring(x))\nforall x (Flecked(x) -> not Iterative(x))\n\nGinger(igor)\n\nGinger(igor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Celisse is untied. Celisse is not bayesian. Celisse is benevolent. Aaron is dianoetic. Aaron is bayesian. Aaron is benevolent. Aaron is east. Sydelle is bayesian. Peter is lordly. Peter is benevolent. Young things are bayesian. All lordly things are bayesian. Smart, untied things are not bayesian. All bayesian things are benevolent. If something is untied and east then it is dianoetic. Quiet things are dianoetic. If something is resistless and benevolent then it is untied. If something is resistless then it is not east. Sydelle is not resistless.", "logic": "\nUntied(celisse)\nnot Bayesian(celisse)\nBenevolent(celisse)\nDianoetic(aaron)\nBayesian(aaron)\nBenevolent(aaron)\nEast(aaron)\nBayesian(sydelle)\nLordly(peter)\nBenevolent(peter)\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Lordly(x) -> Bayesian(x))\nforall x (East(x) and Untied(x) -> not Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Bayesian(x) -> Benevolent(x))\nforall x (Untied(x) and East(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Bayesian(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) and Benevolent(x) -> Untied(x))\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> not East(x))\n\nnot Resistless(sydelle)\n\nnot Resistless(sydelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Dayna is unlicensed. Dayna is not vigorous. Dayna is profaned. Claudetta is convincing. Claudetta is vigorous. Claudetta is profaned. Claudetta is sulcate. Giorgio is vigorous. Leigh is ascendable. Leigh is profaned. Young things are vigorous. All ascendable things are vigorous. Smart, unlicensed things are not vigorous. All vigorous things are profaned. If something is unlicensed and sulcate then it is convincing. Quiet things are convincing. If something is tympanic and profaned then it is unlicensed. If something is tympanic then it is not sulcate. Leigh is sulcate.", "logic": "\nUnlicensed(dayna)\nnot Vigorous(dayna)\nProfaned(dayna)\nConvincing(claudetta)\nVigorous(claudetta)\nProfaned(claudetta)\nSulcate(claudetta)\nVigorous(giorgio)\nAscendable(leigh)\nProfaned(leigh)\nforall x (Tympanic(x) -> Vigorous(x))\nforall x (Ascendable(x) -> Vigorous(x))\nforall x (Sulcate(x) and Unlicensed(x) -> not Vigorous(x))\nforall x (Vigorous(x) -> Profaned(x))\nforall x (Unlicensed(x) and Sulcate(x) -> Convincing(x))\nforall x (Vigorous(x) -> Convincing(x))\nforall x (Tympanic(x) and Profaned(x) -> Unlicensed(x))\nforall x (Tympanic(x) -> not Sulcate(x))\n\nSulcate(leigh)\n\nSulcate(leigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-307"} {"premises": "Cheslie is soundproof. Cheslie is ungoverned. Cheslie is congenial. Cheslie is vigorous. Meggi is confutable. Meggi is ungoverned. Meggi is congenial. Meggi is vigorous. Elga is mohammedan. Elga is confutable. Elga is soundproof. Elga is ungoverned. Elga is congenial. Elga is vigorous. Elga is bacterioid. Quiet things are bacterioid. If something is bacterioid and ungoverned then it is congenial. All confutable, mohammedan things are soundproof. If something is mohammedan and soundproof then it is congenial. Round things are mohammedan. If Elga is ungoverned then Elga is congenial. Elga is congenial.", "logic": "\nSoundproof(cheslie)\nUngoverned(cheslie)\nCongenial(cheslie)\nVigorous(cheslie)\nConfutable(meggi)\nUngoverned(meggi)\nCongenial(meggi)\nVigorous(meggi)\nMohammedan(elga)\nConfutable(elga)\nSoundproof(elga)\nUngoverned(elga)\nCongenial(elga)\nVigorous(elga)\nBacterioid(elga)\nforall x (Soundproof(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and Ungoverned(x) -> Congenial(x))\nforall x (Confutable(x) and Mohammedan(x) -> Soundproof(x))\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) and Soundproof(x) -> Congenial(x))\nforall x (Congenial(x) -> Mohammedan(x))\nUngoverned(elga) -> Congenial(elga)\n\nCongenial(elga)\n\ntherefore Congenial(elga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Willey is drafty. Willey is speakable. Willey is exhausting. Willey is splenetic. Augustus is noachian. Augustus is speakable. Augustus is exhausting. Augustus is splenetic. Emmalee is hebraical. Emmalee is noachian. Emmalee is drafty. Emmalee is speakable. Emmalee is exhausting. Emmalee is splenetic. Emmalee is actinoid. Quiet things are actinoid. If something is actinoid and speakable then it is exhausting. All noachian, hebraical things are drafty. If something is hebraical and drafty then it is exhausting. Round things are hebraical. If Emmalee is speakable then Emmalee is exhausting. Willey is not drafty.", "logic": "\nDrafty(willey)\nSpeakable(willey)\nExhausting(willey)\nSplenetic(willey)\nNoachian(augustus)\nSpeakable(augustus)\nExhausting(augustus)\nSplenetic(augustus)\nHebraical(emmalee)\nNoachian(emmalee)\nDrafty(emmalee)\nSpeakable(emmalee)\nExhausting(emmalee)\nSplenetic(emmalee)\nActinoid(emmalee)\nforall x (Drafty(x) -> Actinoid(x))\nforall x (Actinoid(x) and Speakable(x) -> Exhausting(x))\nforall x (Noachian(x) and Hebraical(x) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Hebraical(x) and Drafty(x) -> Exhausting(x))\nforall x (Exhausting(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nSpeakable(emmalee) -> Exhausting(emmalee)\n\nnot Drafty(willey)\n\ntherefore Drafty(willey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Patience is famished. Patience is youngish. Patience is rollicking. Patience is desultory. Arne is locomotive. Arne is youngish. Arne is rollicking. Arne is desultory. Wenona is creaky. Wenona is locomotive. Wenona is famished. Wenona is youngish. Wenona is rollicking. Wenona is desultory. Wenona is ostensible. Quiet things are ostensible. If something is ostensible and youngish then it is rollicking. All locomotive, creaky things are famished. If something is creaky and famished then it is rollicking. Round things are creaky. If Wenona is youngish then Wenona is rollicking. Patience is creaky.", "logic": "\nFamished(patience)\nYoungish(patience)\nRollicking(patience)\nDesultory(patience)\nLocomotive(arne)\nYoungish(arne)\nRollicking(arne)\nDesultory(arne)\nCreaky(wenona)\nLocomotive(wenona)\nFamished(wenona)\nYoungish(wenona)\nRollicking(wenona)\nDesultory(wenona)\nOstensible(wenona)\nforall x (Famished(x) -> Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Ostensible(x) and Youngish(x) -> Rollicking(x))\nforall x (Locomotive(x) and Creaky(x) -> Famished(x))\nforall x (Creaky(x) and Famished(x) -> Rollicking(x))\nforall x (Rollicking(x) -> Creaky(x))\nYoungish(wenona) -> Rollicking(wenona)\n\nCreaky(patience)\n\nRollicking(patience) and forall x (Rollicking(x) -> Creaky(x)) -> therefore Creaky(patience)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Nolana is agreed. Nolana is shining. Nolana is cupular. Nolana is coccal. Deana is strapless. Deana is shining. Deana is cupular. Deana is coccal. Arie is cytologic. Arie is strapless. Arie is agreed. Arie is shining. Arie is cupular. Arie is coccal. Arie is measly. Quiet things are measly. If something is measly and shining then it is cupular. All strapless, cytologic things are agreed. If something is cytologic and agreed then it is cupular. Round things are cytologic. If Arie is shining then Arie is cupular. Nolana is not measly.", "logic": "\nAgreed(nolana)\nShining(nolana)\nCupular(nolana)\nCoccal(nolana)\nStrapless(deana)\nShining(deana)\nCupular(deana)\nCoccal(deana)\nCytologic(arie)\nStrapless(arie)\nAgreed(arie)\nShining(arie)\nCupular(arie)\nCoccal(arie)\nMeasly(arie)\nforall x (Agreed(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) and Shining(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) and Cytologic(x) -> Agreed(x))\nforall x (Cytologic(x) and Agreed(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nShining(arie) -> Cupular(arie)\n\nnot Measly(nolana)\n\nAgreed(nolana) and forall x (Agreed(x) -> Measly(x)) -> therefore Measly(nolana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Leela is bantam. Leela is cagy. Leela is convolute. Leela is insidious. Jean is sudden. Jean is cagy. Jean is convolute. Jean is insidious. Duffy is productive. Duffy is sudden. Duffy is bantam. Duffy is cagy. Duffy is convolute. Duffy is insidious. Duffy is purgative. Quiet things are purgative. If something is purgative and cagy then it is convolute. All sudden, productive things are bantam. If something is productive and bantam then it is convolute. Round things are productive. If Duffy is cagy then Duffy is convolute. Jean is bantam.", "logic": "\nBantam(leela)\nCagy(leela)\nConvolute(leela)\nInsidious(leela)\nSudden(jean)\nCagy(jean)\nConvolute(jean)\nInsidious(jean)\nProductive(duffy)\nSudden(duffy)\nBantam(duffy)\nCagy(duffy)\nConvolute(duffy)\nInsidious(duffy)\nPurgative(duffy)\nforall x (Bantam(x) -> Purgative(x))\nforall x (Purgative(x) and Cagy(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Sudden(x) and Productive(x) -> Bantam(x))\nforall x (Productive(x) and Bantam(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> Productive(x))\nCagy(duffy) -> Convolute(duffy)\n\nBantam(jean)\n\nConvolute(jean) and forall x (Convolute(x) -> Productive(x)) -> therefore Productive(jean) Sudden(jean) and Productive(jean) and forall x (Sudden(x) and Productive(x) -> Bantam(x)) -> therefore Bantam(jean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Bell is mortgaged. Bell is leibnizian. Bell is chylific. Bell is scarred. Tanney is sharpened. Tanney is leibnizian. Tanney is chylific. Tanney is scarred. Kassey is laurelled. Kassey is sharpened. Kassey is mortgaged. Kassey is leibnizian. Kassey is chylific. Kassey is scarred. Kassey is semilunar. Quiet things are semilunar. If something is semilunar and leibnizian then it is chylific. All sharpened, laurelled things are mortgaged. If something is laurelled and mortgaged then it is chylific. Round things are laurelled. If Kassey is leibnizian then Kassey is chylific. Tanney is not mortgaged.", "logic": "\nMortgaged(bell)\nLeibnizian(bell)\nChylific(bell)\nScarred(bell)\nSharpened(tanney)\nLeibnizian(tanney)\nChylific(tanney)\nScarred(tanney)\nLaurelled(kassey)\nSharpened(kassey)\nMortgaged(kassey)\nLeibnizian(kassey)\nChylific(kassey)\nScarred(kassey)\nSemilunar(kassey)\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) and Leibnizian(x) -> Chylific(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) and Laurelled(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Laurelled(x) and Mortgaged(x) -> Chylific(x))\nforall x (Chylific(x) -> Laurelled(x))\nLeibnizian(kassey) -> Chylific(kassey)\n\nnot Mortgaged(tanney)\n\nChylific(tanney) and forall x (Chylific(x) -> Laurelled(x)) -> therefore Laurelled(tanney) Sharpened(tanney) and Laurelled(tanney) and forall x (Sharpened(x) and Laurelled(x) -> Mortgaged(x)) -> therefore Mortgaged(tanney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Dulcie is uraemic. Dulcie is catchy. Dulcie is molal. Dulcie is sunburnt. Karel is derisive. Karel is catchy. Karel is molal. Karel is sunburnt. Herman is unsoluble. Herman is derisive. Herman is uraemic. Herman is catchy. Herman is molal. Herman is sunburnt. Herman is awheel. Quiet things are awheel. If something is awheel and catchy then it is molal. All derisive, unsoluble things are uraemic. If something is unsoluble and uraemic then it is molal. Round things are unsoluble. If Herman is catchy then Herman is molal. Karel is awheel.", "logic": "\nUraemic(dulcie)\nCatchy(dulcie)\nMolal(dulcie)\nSunburnt(dulcie)\nDerisive(karel)\nCatchy(karel)\nMolal(karel)\nSunburnt(karel)\nUnsoluble(herman)\nDerisive(herman)\nUraemic(herman)\nCatchy(herman)\nMolal(herman)\nSunburnt(herman)\nAwheel(herman)\nforall x (Uraemic(x) -> Awheel(x))\nforall x (Awheel(x) and Catchy(x) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Derisive(x) and Unsoluble(x) -> Uraemic(x))\nforall x (Unsoluble(x) and Uraemic(x) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Molal(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nCatchy(herman) -> Molal(herman)\n\nAwheel(karel)\n\nMolal(karel) and forall x (Molal(x) -> Unsoluble(x)) -> therefore Unsoluble(karel) Derisive(karel) and Unsoluble(karel) and forall x (Derisive(x) and Unsoluble(x) -> Uraemic(x)) -> therefore Uraemic(karel) Uraemic(karel) and forall x (Uraemic(x) -> Awheel(x)) -> therefore Awheel(karel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "Kaster is endogenic. Kaster is facial. Kaster is puzzled. Kaster is unstinting. Indira is estrous. Indira is facial. Indira is puzzled. Indira is unstinting. Allissa is anuretic. Allissa is estrous. Allissa is endogenic. Allissa is facial. Allissa is puzzled. Allissa is unstinting. Allissa is topical. Quiet things are topical. If something is topical and facial then it is puzzled. All estrous, anuretic things are endogenic. If something is anuretic and endogenic then it is puzzled. Round things are anuretic. If Allissa is facial then Allissa is puzzled. Indira is not topical.", "logic": "\nEndogenic(kaster)\nFacial(kaster)\nPuzzled(kaster)\nUnstinting(kaster)\nEstrous(indira)\nFacial(indira)\nPuzzled(indira)\nUnstinting(indira)\nAnuretic(allissa)\nEstrous(allissa)\nEndogenic(allissa)\nFacial(allissa)\nPuzzled(allissa)\nUnstinting(allissa)\nTopical(allissa)\nforall x (Endogenic(x) -> Topical(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) and Facial(x) -> Puzzled(x))\nforall x (Estrous(x) and Anuretic(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) and Endogenic(x) -> Puzzled(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Anuretic(x))\nFacial(allissa) -> Puzzled(allissa)\n\nnot Topical(indira)\n\nPuzzled(indira) and forall x (Puzzled(x) -> Anuretic(x)) -> therefore Anuretic(indira) Estrous(indira) and Anuretic(indira) and forall x (Estrous(x) and Anuretic(x) -> Endogenic(x)) -> therefore Endogenic(indira) Endogenic(indira) and forall x (Endogenic(x) -> Topical(x)) -> therefore Topical(indira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1509"} {"premises": "The june spree the olivette. The kaylil tabularise the june. The olivette spree the june. If the olivette is departed and the olivette is thwarting then the olivette does not like the kaylil. If someone catechise the olivette then the olivette spree the kaylil. If the june tabularise the kaylil then the kaylil is sinless. If someone spree the kaylil then they are thwarting. If the olivette does not like the june and the olivette is not departed then the june tabularise the kaylil. If someone spree the kaylil and they do not like the olivette then they need the june. If someone tabularise the june then they need the olivette. If someone tabularise the olivette and they do not like the kaylil then the olivette does not need the kaylil. The olivette spree the june.", "logic": "\nSpree(june, olivette)\nTabularise(kaylil, june)\nSpree(olivette, june)\nDeparted(olivette) and Thwarting(olivette) -> not Spree(olivette, kaylil)\nforall x (Catechise(x, olivette) -> Spree(olivette, kaylil))\nTabularise(june, kaylil) -> Sinless(kaylil)\nforall x (Spree(x, kaylil) -> Thwarting(x))\nnot Spree(olivette, june) and not Departed(olivette) -> Tabularise(june, kaylil)\nforall x (Spree(x, kaylil) and not Spree(x, olivette) -> Catechise(x, june))\nforall x (Tabularise(x, june) -> Catechise(x, olivette))\nforall x (Tabularise(x, olivette) and not Spree(x, kaylil) -> not Catechise(olivette, kaylil))\n\nSpree(olivette, june)\n\ntherefore Spree(olivette, june)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The clemente upload the buster. The jordon groan the clemente. The buster upload the clemente. If the buster is counter and the buster is noetic then the buster does not like the jordon. If someone amalgamate the buster then the buster upload the jordon. If the clemente groan the jordon then the jordon is oxonian. If someone upload the jordon then they are noetic. If the buster does not like the clemente and the buster is not counter then the clemente groan the jordon. If someone upload the jordon and they do not like the buster then they need the clemente. If someone groan the clemente then they need the buster. If someone groan the buster and they do not like the jordon then the buster does not need the jordon. The clemente does not like the buster.", "logic": "\nUpload(clemente, buster)\nGroan(jordon, clemente)\nUpload(buster, clemente)\nCounter(buster) and Noetic(buster) -> not Upload(buster, jordon)\nforall x (Amalgamate(x, buster) -> Upload(buster, jordon))\nGroan(clemente, jordon) -> Oxonian(jordon)\nforall x (Upload(x, jordon) -> Noetic(x))\nnot Upload(buster, clemente) and not Counter(buster) -> Groan(clemente, jordon)\nforall x (Upload(x, jordon) and not Upload(x, buster) -> Amalgamate(x, clemente))\nforall x (Groan(x, clemente) -> Amalgamate(x, buster))\nforall x (Groan(x, buster) and not Upload(x, jordon) -> not Amalgamate(buster, jordon))\n\nnot Upload(clemente, buster)\n\ntherefore Upload(clemente, buster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The richy drill the rosaleen. The stephani exempt the richy. The rosaleen drill the richy. If the rosaleen is assistive and the rosaleen is lxxi then the rosaleen does not like the stephani. If someone plan the rosaleen then the rosaleen drill the stephani. If the richy exempt the stephani then the stephani is animal. If someone drill the stephani then they are lxxi. If the rosaleen does not like the richy and the rosaleen is not assistive then the richy exempt the stephani. If someone drill the stephani and they do not like the rosaleen then they need the richy. If someone exempt the richy then they need the rosaleen. If someone exempt the rosaleen and they do not like the stephani then the rosaleen does not need the stephani. The stephani plan the rosaleen.", "logic": "\nDrill(richy, rosaleen)\nExempt(stephani, richy)\nDrill(rosaleen, richy)\nAssistive(rosaleen) and Lxxi(rosaleen) -> not Drill(rosaleen, stephani)\nforall x (Plan(x, rosaleen) -> Drill(rosaleen, stephani))\nExempt(richy, stephani) -> Animal(stephani)\nforall x (Drill(x, stephani) -> Lxxi(x))\nnot Drill(rosaleen, richy) and not Assistive(rosaleen) -> Exempt(richy, stephani)\nforall x (Drill(x, stephani) and not Drill(x, rosaleen) -> Plan(x, richy))\nforall x (Exempt(x, richy) -> Plan(x, rosaleen))\nforall x (Exempt(x, rosaleen) and not Drill(x, stephani) -> not Plan(rosaleen, stephani))\n\nPlan(stephani, rosaleen)\n\nExempt(stephani, richy) and forall x (Exempt(x, richy) -> Plan(x, rosaleen)) -> therefore Plan(stephani, rosaleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The emory blast the parker. The lefty differ the emory. The parker blast the emory. If the parker is inactive and the parker is couthie then the parker does not like the lefty. If someone severalize the parker then the parker blast the lefty. If the emory differ the lefty then the lefty is hominid. If someone blast the lefty then they are couthie. If the parker does not like the emory and the parker is not inactive then the emory differ the lefty. If someone blast the lefty and they do not like the parker then they need the emory. If someone differ the emory then they need the parker. If someone differ the parker and they do not like the lefty then the parker does not need the lefty. The lefty does not need the parker.", "logic": "\nBlast(emory, parker)\nDiffer(lefty, emory)\nBlast(parker, emory)\nInactive(parker) and Couthie(parker) -> not Blast(parker, lefty)\nforall x (Severalize(x, parker) -> Blast(parker, lefty))\nDiffer(emory, lefty) -> Hominid(lefty)\nforall x (Blast(x, lefty) -> Couthie(x))\nnot Blast(parker, emory) and not Inactive(parker) -> Differ(emory, lefty)\nforall x (Blast(x, lefty) and not Blast(x, parker) -> Severalize(x, emory))\nforall x (Differ(x, emory) -> Severalize(x, parker))\nforall x (Differ(x, parker) and not Blast(x, lefty) -> not Severalize(parker, lefty))\n\nnot Severalize(lefty, parker)\n\nDiffer(lefty, emory) and forall x (Differ(x, emory) -> Severalize(x, parker)) -> therefore Severalize(lefty, parker)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The olaf sport the thayne. The malka posit the olaf. The thayne sport the olaf. If the thayne is subjugated and the thayne is lenitive then the thayne does not like the malka. If someone warehouse the thayne then the thayne sport the malka. If the olaf posit the malka then the malka is reverent. If someone sport the malka then they are lenitive. If the thayne does not like the olaf and the thayne is not subjugated then the olaf posit the malka. If someone sport the malka and they do not like the thayne then they need the olaf. If someone posit the olaf then they need the thayne. If someone posit the thayne and they do not like the malka then the thayne does not need the malka. The thayne sport the malka.", "logic": "\nSport(olaf, thayne)\nPosit(malka, olaf)\nSport(thayne, olaf)\nSubjugated(thayne) and Lenitive(thayne) -> not Sport(thayne, malka)\nforall x (Warehouse(x, thayne) -> Sport(thayne, malka))\nPosit(olaf, malka) -> Reverent(malka)\nforall x (Sport(x, malka) -> Lenitive(x))\nnot Sport(thayne, olaf) and not Subjugated(thayne) -> Posit(olaf, malka)\nforall x (Sport(x, malka) and not Sport(x, thayne) -> Warehouse(x, olaf))\nforall x (Posit(x, olaf) -> Warehouse(x, thayne))\nforall x (Posit(x, thayne) and not Sport(x, malka) -> not Warehouse(thayne, malka))\n\nSport(thayne, malka)\n\nPosit(malka, olaf) and forall x (Posit(x, olaf) -> Warehouse(x, thayne)) -> therefore Warehouse(malka, thayne) Warehouse(malka, thayne) and forall x (Warehouse(x, thayne) -> Sport(thayne, malka)) -> therefore Sport(thayne, malka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The nell dislocate the albrecht. The antin reprieve the nell. The albrecht dislocate the nell. If the albrecht is adorable and the albrecht is reentrant then the albrecht does not like the antin. If someone overstress the albrecht then the albrecht dislocate the antin. If the nell reprieve the antin then the antin is comfy. If someone dislocate the antin then they are reentrant. If the albrecht does not like the nell and the albrecht is not adorable then the nell reprieve the antin. If someone dislocate the antin and they do not like the albrecht then they need the nell. If someone reprieve the nell then they need the albrecht. If someone reprieve the albrecht and they do not like the antin then the albrecht does not need the antin. The albrecht does not like the antin.", "logic": "\nDislocate(nell, albrecht)\nReprieve(antin, nell)\nDislocate(albrecht, nell)\nAdorable(albrecht) and Reentrant(albrecht) -> not Dislocate(albrecht, antin)\nforall x (Overstress(x, albrecht) -> Dislocate(albrecht, antin))\nReprieve(nell, antin) -> Comfy(antin)\nforall x (Dislocate(x, antin) -> Reentrant(x))\nnot Dislocate(albrecht, nell) and not Adorable(albrecht) -> Reprieve(nell, antin)\nforall x (Dislocate(x, antin) and not Dislocate(x, albrecht) -> Overstress(x, nell))\nforall x (Reprieve(x, nell) -> Overstress(x, albrecht))\nforall x (Reprieve(x, albrecht) and not Dislocate(x, antin) -> not Overstress(albrecht, antin))\n\nnot Dislocate(albrecht, antin)\n\nReprieve(antin, nell) and forall x (Reprieve(x, nell) -> Overstress(x, albrecht)) -> therefore Overstress(antin, albrecht) Overstress(antin, albrecht) and forall x (Overstress(x, albrecht) -> Dislocate(albrecht, antin)) -> therefore Dislocate(albrecht, antin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The clary advect the kelsy. The elenore tyrannize the clary. The kelsy advect the clary. If the kelsy is caudate and the kelsy is articulary then the kelsy does not like the elenore. If someone cleat the kelsy then the kelsy advect the elenore. If the clary tyrannize the elenore then the elenore is drastic. If someone advect the elenore then they are articulary. If the kelsy does not like the clary and the kelsy is not caudate then the clary tyrannize the elenore. If someone advect the elenore and they do not like the kelsy then they need the clary. If someone tyrannize the clary then they need the kelsy. If someone tyrannize the kelsy and they do not like the elenore then the kelsy does not need the elenore. The kelsy is articulary.", "logic": "\nAdvect(clary, kelsy)\nTyrannize(elenore, clary)\nAdvect(kelsy, clary)\nCaudate(kelsy) and Articulary(kelsy) -> not Advect(kelsy, elenore)\nforall x (Cleat(x, kelsy) -> Advect(kelsy, elenore))\nTyrannize(clary, elenore) -> Drastic(elenore)\nforall x (Advect(x, elenore) -> Articulary(x))\nnot Advect(kelsy, clary) and not Caudate(kelsy) -> Tyrannize(clary, elenore)\nforall x (Advect(x, elenore) and not Advect(x, kelsy) -> Cleat(x, clary))\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, clary) -> Cleat(x, kelsy))\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, kelsy) and not Advect(x, elenore) -> not Cleat(kelsy, elenore))\n\nArticulary(kelsy)\n\nTyrannize(elenore, clary) and forall x (Tyrannize(x, clary) -> Cleat(x, kelsy)) -> therefore Cleat(elenore, kelsy) Cleat(elenore, kelsy) and forall x (Cleat(x, kelsy) -> Advect(kelsy, elenore)) -> therefore Advect(kelsy, elenore) Advect(kelsy, elenore) and forall x (Advect(x, elenore) -> Articulary(x)) -> therefore Articulary(kelsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The peta mend the ernst. The roderic blend the peta. The ernst mend the peta. If the ernst is coagulated and the ernst is inborn then the ernst does not like the roderic. If someone emigrate the ernst then the ernst mend the roderic. If the peta blend the roderic then the roderic is graphic. If someone mend the roderic then they are inborn. If the ernst does not like the peta and the ernst is not coagulated then the peta blend the roderic. If someone mend the roderic and they do not like the ernst then they need the peta. If someone blend the peta then they need the ernst. If someone blend the ernst and they do not like the roderic then the ernst does not need the roderic. The ernst is not inborn.", "logic": "\nMend(peta, ernst)\nBlend(roderic, peta)\nMend(ernst, peta)\nCoagulated(ernst) and Inborn(ernst) -> not Mend(ernst, roderic)\nforall x (Emigrate(x, ernst) -> Mend(ernst, roderic))\nBlend(peta, roderic) -> Graphic(roderic)\nforall x (Mend(x, roderic) -> Inborn(x))\nnot Mend(ernst, peta) and not Coagulated(ernst) -> Blend(peta, roderic)\nforall x (Mend(x, roderic) and not Mend(x, ernst) -> Emigrate(x, peta))\nforall x (Blend(x, peta) -> Emigrate(x, ernst))\nforall x (Blend(x, ernst) and not Mend(x, roderic) -> not Emigrate(ernst, roderic))\n\nnot Inborn(ernst)\n\nBlend(roderic, peta) and forall x (Blend(x, peta) -> Emigrate(x, ernst)) -> therefore Emigrate(roderic, ernst) Emigrate(roderic, ernst) and forall x (Emigrate(x, ernst) -> Mend(ernst, roderic)) -> therefore Mend(ernst, roderic) Mend(ernst, roderic) and forall x (Mend(x, roderic) -> Inborn(x)) -> therefore Inborn(ernst)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The gilberto pare the joye. The cindra roar the gilberto. The joye pare the gilberto. If the joye is narial and the joye is axonal then the joye does not like the cindra. If someone gasp the joye then the joye pare the cindra. If the gilberto roar the cindra then the cindra is royal. If someone pare the cindra then they are axonal. If the joye does not like the gilberto and the joye is not narial then the gilberto roar the cindra. If someone pare the cindra and they do not like the joye then they need the gilberto. If someone roar the gilberto then they need the joye. If someone roar the joye and they do not like the cindra then the joye does not need the cindra. The gilberto does not need the joye.", "logic": "\nPare(gilberto, joye)\nRoar(cindra, gilberto)\nPare(joye, gilberto)\nNarial(joye) and Axonal(joye) -> not Pare(joye, cindra)\nforall x (Gasp(x, joye) -> Pare(joye, cindra))\nRoar(gilberto, cindra) -> Royal(cindra)\nforall x (Pare(x, cindra) -> Axonal(x))\nnot Pare(joye, gilberto) and not Narial(joye) -> Roar(gilberto, cindra)\nforall x (Pare(x, cindra) and not Pare(x, joye) -> Gasp(x, gilberto))\nforall x (Roar(x, gilberto) -> Gasp(x, joye))\nforall x (Roar(x, joye) and not Pare(x, cindra) -> not Gasp(joye, cindra))\n\nnot Gasp(gilberto, joye)\n\nforall x (Roar(x, gilberto) -> Gasp(x, joye)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The roanna belie the joanna. The joaquin pillory the roanna. The joanna belie the roanna. If the joanna is chintzy and the joanna is disastrous then the joanna does not like the joaquin. If someone obturate the joanna then the joanna belie the joaquin. If the roanna pillory the joaquin then the joaquin is fantastic. If someone belie the joaquin then they are disastrous. If the joanna does not like the roanna and the joanna is not chintzy then the roanna pillory the joaquin. If someone belie the joaquin and they do not like the joanna then they need the roanna. If someone pillory the roanna then they need the joanna. If someone pillory the joanna and they do not like the joaquin then the joanna does not need the joaquin. The joaquin is disastrous.", "logic": "\nBelie(roanna, joanna)\nPillory(joaquin, roanna)\nBelie(joanna, roanna)\nChintzy(joanna) and Disastrous(joanna) -> not Belie(joanna, joaquin)\nforall x (Obturate(x, joanna) -> Belie(joanna, joaquin))\nPillory(roanna, joaquin) -> Fantastic(joaquin)\nforall x (Belie(x, joaquin) -> Disastrous(x))\nnot Belie(joanna, roanna) and not Chintzy(joanna) -> Pillory(roanna, joaquin)\nforall x (Belie(x, joaquin) and not Belie(x, joanna) -> Obturate(x, roanna))\nforall x (Pillory(x, roanna) -> Obturate(x, joanna))\nforall x (Pillory(x, joanna) and not Belie(x, joaquin) -> not Obturate(joanna, joaquin))\n\nDisastrous(joaquin)\n\nforall x (Belie(x, joaquin) -> Disastrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The cornela torch the lind. The stacie fend the cornela. The lind torch the cornela. If the lind is duplex and the lind is tonic then the lind does not like the stacie. If someone scroll the lind then the lind torch the stacie. If the cornela fend the stacie then the stacie is motley. If someone torch the stacie then they are tonic. If the lind does not like the cornela and the lind is not duplex then the cornela fend the stacie. If someone torch the stacie and they do not like the lind then they need the cornela. If someone fend the cornela then they need the lind. If someone fend the lind and they do not like the stacie then the lind does not need the stacie. The stacie does not need the cornela.", "logic": "\nTorch(cornela, lind)\nFend(stacie, cornela)\nTorch(lind, cornela)\nDuplex(lind) and Tonic(lind) -> not Torch(lind, stacie)\nforall x (Scroll(x, lind) -> Torch(lind, stacie))\nFend(cornela, stacie) -> Motley(stacie)\nforall x (Torch(x, stacie) -> Tonic(x))\nnot Torch(lind, cornela) and not Duplex(lind) -> Fend(cornela, stacie)\nforall x (Torch(x, stacie) and not Torch(x, lind) -> Scroll(x, cornela))\nforall x (Fend(x, cornela) -> Scroll(x, lind))\nforall x (Fend(x, lind) and not Torch(x, stacie) -> not Scroll(lind, stacie))\n\nnot Scroll(stacie, cornela)\n\nforall x (Torch(x, stacie) and not Torch(x, lind) -> Scroll(x, cornela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The rees demise the tarrant. The loren pompadour the rees. The tarrant demise the rees. If the tarrant is unplanned and the tarrant is belgian then the tarrant does not like the loren. If someone flunk the tarrant then the tarrant demise the loren. If the rees pompadour the loren then the loren is concealing. If someone demise the loren then they are belgian. If the tarrant does not like the rees and the tarrant is not unplanned then the rees pompadour the loren. If someone demise the loren and they do not like the tarrant then they need the rees. If someone pompadour the rees then they need the tarrant. If someone pompadour the tarrant and they do not like the loren then the tarrant does not need the loren. The tarrant flunk the rees.", "logic": "\nDemise(rees, tarrant)\nPompadour(loren, rees)\nDemise(tarrant, rees)\nUnplanned(tarrant) and Belgian(tarrant) -> not Demise(tarrant, loren)\nforall x (Flunk(x, tarrant) -> Demise(tarrant, loren))\nPompadour(rees, loren) -> Concealing(loren)\nforall x (Demise(x, loren) -> Belgian(x))\nnot Demise(tarrant, rees) and not Unplanned(tarrant) -> Pompadour(rees, loren)\nforall x (Demise(x, loren) and not Demise(x, tarrant) -> Flunk(x, rees))\nforall x (Pompadour(x, rees) -> Flunk(x, tarrant))\nforall x (Pompadour(x, tarrant) and not Demise(x, loren) -> not Flunk(tarrant, loren))\n\nFlunk(tarrant, rees)\n\nforall x (Demise(x, loren) and not Demise(x, tarrant) -> Flunk(x, rees)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The renate engild the tera. The dannie adore the renate. The tera engild the renate. If the tera is propitious and the tera is steady then the tera does not like the dannie. If someone moderate the tera then the tera engild the dannie. If the renate adore the dannie then the dannie is sapiential. If someone engild the dannie then they are steady. If the tera does not like the renate and the tera is not propitious then the renate adore the dannie. If someone engild the dannie and they do not like the tera then they need the renate. If someone adore the renate then they need the tera. If someone adore the tera and they do not like the dannie then the tera does not need the dannie. The tera is not young.", "logic": "\nEngild(renate, tera)\nAdore(dannie, renate)\nEngild(tera, renate)\nPropitious(tera) and Steady(tera) -> not Engild(tera, dannie)\nforall x (Moderate(x, tera) -> Engild(tera, dannie))\nAdore(renate, dannie) -> Sapiential(dannie)\nforall x (Engild(x, dannie) -> Steady(x))\nnot Engild(tera, renate) and not Propitious(tera) -> Adore(renate, dannie)\nforall x (Engild(x, dannie) and not Engild(x, tera) -> Moderate(x, renate))\nforall x (Adore(x, renate) -> Moderate(x, tera))\nforall x (Adore(x, tera) and not Engild(x, dannie) -> not Moderate(tera, dannie))\n\nnot Young(tera)\n\nnot Young(tera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The neville fillet the wynn. The nannie spume the neville. The wynn fillet the neville. If the wynn is glassless and the wynn is harmonious then the wynn does not like the nannie. If someone occupy the wynn then the wynn fillet the nannie. If the neville spume the nannie then the nannie is uniovulate. If someone fillet the nannie then they are harmonious. If the wynn does not like the neville and the wynn is not glassless then the neville spume the nannie. If someone fillet the nannie and they do not like the wynn then they need the neville. If someone spume the neville then they need the wynn. If someone spume the wynn and they do not like the nannie then the wynn does not need the nannie. The neville spume the neville.", "logic": "\nFillet(neville, wynn)\nSpume(nannie, neville)\nFillet(wynn, neville)\nGlassless(wynn) and Harmonious(wynn) -> not Fillet(wynn, nannie)\nforall x (Occupy(x, wynn) -> Fillet(wynn, nannie))\nSpume(neville, nannie) -> Uniovulate(nannie)\nforall x (Fillet(x, nannie) -> Harmonious(x))\nnot Fillet(wynn, neville) and not Glassless(wynn) -> Spume(neville, nannie)\nforall x (Fillet(x, nannie) and not Fillet(x, wynn) -> Occupy(x, neville))\nforall x (Spume(x, neville) -> Occupy(x, wynn))\nforall x (Spume(x, wynn) and not Fillet(x, nannie) -> not Occupy(wynn, nannie))\n\nSpume(neville, neville)\n\nSpume(neville, neville) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The lucienne assonate the orlando. The tasia bombinate the lucienne. The orlando assonate the lucienne. If the orlando is photogenic and the orlando is hemophilic then the orlando does not like the tasia. If someone resent the orlando then the orlando assonate the tasia. If the lucienne bombinate the tasia then the tasia is tenacious. If someone assonate the tasia then they are hemophilic. If the orlando does not like the lucienne and the orlando is not photogenic then the lucienne bombinate the tasia. If someone assonate the tasia and they do not like the orlando then they need the lucienne. If someone bombinate the lucienne then they need the orlando. If someone bombinate the orlando and they do not like the tasia then the orlando does not need the tasia. The tasia does not eat the tasia.", "logic": "\nAssonate(lucienne, orlando)\nBombinate(tasia, lucienne)\nAssonate(orlando, lucienne)\nPhotogenic(orlando) and Hemophilic(orlando) -> not Assonate(orlando, tasia)\nforall x (Resent(x, orlando) -> Assonate(orlando, tasia))\nBombinate(lucienne, tasia) -> Tenacious(tasia)\nforall x (Assonate(x, tasia) -> Hemophilic(x))\nnot Assonate(orlando, lucienne) and not Photogenic(orlando) -> Bombinate(lucienne, tasia)\nforall x (Assonate(x, tasia) and not Assonate(x, orlando) -> Resent(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Bombinate(x, lucienne) -> Resent(x, orlando))\nforall x (Bombinate(x, orlando) and not Assonate(x, tasia) -> not Resent(orlando, tasia))\n\nnot Bombinate(tasia, tasia)\n\nnot Bombinate(tasia, tasia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The ericka browse the marys. The arden warn the ericka. The marys browse the ericka. If the marys is pianistic and the marys is multiplex then the marys does not like the arden. If someone unclutter the marys then the marys browse the arden. If the ericka warn the arden then the arden is edgy. If someone browse the arden then they are multiplex. If the marys does not like the ericka and the marys is not pianistic then the ericka warn the arden. If someone browse the arden and they do not like the marys then they need the ericka. If someone warn the ericka then they need the marys. If someone warn the marys and they do not like the arden then the marys does not need the arden. The arden is young.", "logic": "\nBrowse(ericka, marys)\nWarn(arden, ericka)\nBrowse(marys, ericka)\nPianistic(marys) and Multiplex(marys) -> not Browse(marys, arden)\nforall x (Unclutter(x, marys) -> Browse(marys, arden))\nWarn(ericka, arden) -> Edgy(arden)\nforall x (Browse(x, arden) -> Multiplex(x))\nnot Browse(marys, ericka) and not Pianistic(marys) -> Warn(ericka, arden)\nforall x (Browse(x, arden) and not Browse(x, marys) -> Unclutter(x, ericka))\nforall x (Warn(x, ericka) -> Unclutter(x, marys))\nforall x (Warn(x, marys) and not Browse(x, arden) -> not Unclutter(marys, arden))\n\nYoung(arden)\n\nYoung(arden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-895"} {"premises": "The martita is not postwar. The alden snort the martita. The alden beam the martita. The rivalee snort the nonna. The rivalee is cerise. The rivalee beam the nonna. The nonna snort the alden. The nonna is not cerise. The nonna is postwar. The nonna does not like the alden. The nonna does not like the rivalee. The nonna beam the alden. If the rivalee is palliative then the rivalee snort the nonna. The nonna is postwar.", "logic": "\nnot Postwar(martita)\nSnort(alden, martita)\nBeam(alden, martita)\nSnort(rivalee, nonna)\nCerise(rivalee)\nBeam(rivalee, nonna)\nSnort(nonna, alden)\nnot Cerise(nonna)\nPostwar(nonna)\nnot Simmer(nonna, alden)\nnot Simmer(nonna, rivalee)\nBeam(nonna, alden)\nPalliative(rivalee) -> Snort(rivalee, nonna)\n\nPostwar(nonna)\n\ntherefore Postwar(nonna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2084"} {"premises": "The chandra is not appetizing. The rog desolate the chandra. The rog truck the chandra. The davine desolate the beowulf. The davine is winding. The davine truck the beowulf. The beowulf desolate the rog. The beowulf is not winding. The beowulf is appetizing. The beowulf does not like the rog. The beowulf does not like the davine. The beowulf truck the rog. If the davine is roaring then the davine desolate the beowulf. The chandra is appetizing.", "logic": "\nnot Appetizing(chandra)\nDesolate(rog, chandra)\nTruck(rog, chandra)\nDesolate(davine, beowulf)\nWinding(davine)\nTruck(davine, beowulf)\nDesolate(beowulf, rog)\nnot Winding(beowulf)\nAppetizing(beowulf)\nnot Trek(beowulf, rog)\nnot Trek(beowulf, davine)\nTruck(beowulf, rog)\nRoaring(davine) -> Desolate(davine, beowulf)\n\nAppetizing(chandra)\n\ntherefore not Appetizing(chandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2084"} {"premises": "The evie is not arsenious. The lemmie emanate the evie. The lemmie beplaster the evie. The loralee emanate the neda. The loralee is tender. The loralee beplaster the neda. The neda emanate the lemmie. The neda is not tender. The neda is arsenious. The neda does not like the lemmie. The neda does not like the loralee. The neda beplaster the lemmie. If the loralee is quits then the loralee emanate the neda. The lemmie does not like the evie.", "logic": "\nnot Arsenious(evie)\nEmanate(lemmie, evie)\nBeplaster(lemmie, evie)\nEmanate(loralee, neda)\nTender(loralee)\nBeplaster(loralee, neda)\nEmanate(neda, lemmie)\nnot Tender(neda)\nArsenious(neda)\nnot Seethe(neda, lemmie)\nnot Seethe(neda, loralee)\nBeplaster(neda, lemmie)\nQuits(loralee) -> Emanate(loralee, neda)\n\nnot Seethe(lemmie, evie)\n\nnot Seethe(lemmie, evie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2084"} {"premises": "The fanchette is not hydrated. The kailey dabble the fanchette. The kailey smooth the fanchette. The collin dabble the elnore. The collin is dilatory. The collin smooth the elnore. The elnore dabble the kailey. The elnore is not dilatory. The elnore is hydrated. The elnore does not like the kailey. The elnore does not like the collin. The elnore smooth the kailey. If the collin is downstair then the collin dabble the elnore. The elnore smooth the collin.", "logic": "\nnot Hydrated(fanchette)\nDabble(kailey, fanchette)\nSmooth(kailey, fanchette)\nDabble(collin, elnore)\nDilatory(collin)\nSmooth(collin, elnore)\nDabble(elnore, kailey)\nnot Dilatory(elnore)\nHydrated(elnore)\nnot Affront(elnore, kailey)\nnot Affront(elnore, collin)\nSmooth(elnore, kailey)\nDownstair(collin) -> Dabble(collin, elnore)\n\nSmooth(elnore, collin)\n\nSmooth(elnore, collin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2084"} {"premises": "The alene symphonize the una. The esther symphonize the una. The una gladden the esther. If something symphonize the alene then the alene is desiccate. If something gladden the una and the una unclog the esther then it unclog the una. If something unclog the esther then it unclog the alene. The esther symphonize the una.", "logic": "\nSymphonize(alene, una)\nSymphonize(esther, una)\nGladden(una, esther)\nforall x (Symphonize(x, alene) -> Desiccate(alene))\nforall x (Gladden(x, una) and Unclog(una, esther) -> Unclog(x, una))\nforall x (Unclog(x, esther) -> Unclog(x, alene))\n\nSymphonize(esther, una)\n\ntherefore Symphonize(esther, una)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-468"} {"premises": "The shelia amplify the kendall. The yvonne amplify the kendall. The kendall repress the yvonne. If something amplify the shelia then the shelia is saute. If something repress the kendall and the kendall griddle the yvonne then it griddle the kendall. If something griddle the yvonne then it griddle the shelia. The kendall does not chase the yvonne.", "logic": "\nAmplify(shelia, kendall)\nAmplify(yvonne, kendall)\nRepress(kendall, yvonne)\nforall x (Amplify(x, shelia) -> Saute(shelia))\nforall x (Repress(x, kendall) and Griddle(kendall, yvonne) -> Griddle(x, kendall))\nforall x (Griddle(x, yvonne) -> Griddle(x, shelia))\n\nnot Repress(kendall, yvonne)\n\ntherefore Repress(kendall, yvonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-468"} {"premises": "The stefanie purify the faustina. The hilary purify the faustina. The faustina bell the hilary. If something purify the stefanie then the stefanie is petrifying. If something bell the faustina and the faustina start the hilary then it start the faustina. If something start the hilary then it start the stefanie. The stefanie does not like the faustina.", "logic": "\nPurify(stefanie, faustina)\nPurify(hilary, faustina)\nBell(faustina, hilary)\nforall x (Purify(x, stefanie) -> Petrifying(stefanie))\nforall x (Bell(x, faustina) and Start(faustina, hilary) -> Start(x, faustina))\nforall x (Start(x, hilary) -> Start(x, stefanie))\n\nnot Start(stefanie, faustina)\n\nforall x (Bell(x, faustina) and Start(faustina, hilary) -> Start(x, faustina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-468"} {"premises": "The tedrick sonnet the marcus. The charyl sonnet the marcus. The marcus chastise the charyl. If something sonnet the tedrick then the tedrick is balconied. If something chastise the marcus and the marcus prick the charyl then it prick the marcus. If something prick the charyl then it prick the tedrick. The charyl prick the charyl.", "logic": "\nSonnet(tedrick, marcus)\nSonnet(charyl, marcus)\nChastise(marcus, charyl)\nforall x (Sonnet(x, tedrick) -> Balconied(tedrick))\nforall x (Chastise(x, marcus) and Prick(marcus, charyl) -> Prick(x, marcus))\nforall x (Prick(x, charyl) -> Prick(x, tedrick))\n\nPrick(charyl, charyl)\n\nPrick(charyl, charyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-468"} {"premises": "Joletta is monitory. Lonny is unbeatable. Marisa is jubilant. All prenominal people are jubilant. Kind, monitory people are bisexual. Joletta is monitory.", "logic": "\nMonitory(joletta)\nUnbeatable(lonny)\nJubilant(marisa)\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Hyperemic(x) and Monitory(x) -> Bisexual(x))\n\nMonitory(joletta)\n\ntherefore Monitory(joletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4445"} {"premises": "Myrta is gathered. Lura is cedarn. Jodi is rearmost. All jealous people are rearmost. Kind, gathered people are abreast. Jodi is not rearmost.", "logic": "\nGathered(myrta)\nCedarn(lura)\nRearmost(jodi)\nforall x (Jealous(x) -> Rearmost(x))\nforall x (Abactinal(x) and Gathered(x) -> Abreast(x))\n\nnot Rearmost(jodi)\n\ntherefore Rearmost(jodi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4445"} {"premises": "Tella is guardant. Henrietta is dipped. Christie is coaxal. All shitty people are coaxal. Kind, guardant people are mohammedan. Tella is not coaxal.", "logic": "\nGuardant(tella)\nDipped(henrietta)\nCoaxal(christie)\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Abeyant(x) and Guardant(x) -> Mohammedan(x))\n\nnot Coaxal(tella)\n\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Coaxal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4445"} {"premises": "Clareta is divisional. Wash is strep. Lissy is formulary. All orphic people are formulary. Kind, divisional people are overlooked. Wash is red.", "logic": "\nDivisional(clareta)\nStrep(wash)\nFormulary(lissy)\nforall x (Orphic(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Stony(x) and Divisional(x) -> Overlooked(x))\n\nRed(wash)\n\nRed(wash) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4445"} {"premises": "The roxy is shameless. The roxy is not defunct. The roxy is robustious. The roxy is not derelict. The roxy is bayesian. If something is shameless and defunct then it is not bayesian. If something is derelict then it is not bayesian. The roxy is not derelict.", "logic": "\nShameless(roxy)\nnot Defunct(roxy)\nRobustious(roxy)\nnot Derelict(roxy)\nBayesian(roxy)\nforall x (Shameless(x) and Defunct(x) -> not Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Derelict(x) -> not Bayesian(x))\n\nnot Derelict(roxy)\n\ntherefore not Derelict(roxy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5756"} {"premises": "The frans is cherty. The frans is not jainist. The frans is somber. The frans is not redundant. The frans is dispensed. If something is cherty and jainist then it is not dispensed. If something is redundant then it is not dispensed. The frans is not somber.", "logic": "\nCherty(frans)\nnot Jainist(frans)\nSomber(frans)\nnot Redundant(frans)\nDispensed(frans)\nforall x (Cherty(x) and Jainist(x) -> not Dispensed(x))\nforall x (Redundant(x) -> not Dispensed(x))\n\nnot Somber(frans)\n\ntherefore Somber(frans)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5756"} {"premises": "The prudence is stalwart. The prudence is not droll. The prudence is mercerized. The prudence is not perplexing. The prudence is geocentric. If something is stalwart and droll then it is not geocentric. If something is perplexing then it is not geocentric. The prudence does not visit the prudence.", "logic": "\nStalwart(prudence)\nnot Droll(prudence)\nMercerized(prudence)\nnot Perplexing(prudence)\nGeocentric(prudence)\nforall x (Stalwart(x) and Droll(x) -> not Geocentric(x))\nforall x (Perplexing(x) -> not Geocentric(x))\n\nnot Visits(prudence, prudence)\n\nnot Visits(prudence, prudence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5756"} {"premises": "The nicolle is destined. The nicolle is not abranchial. The nicolle is evocative. The nicolle is not eighteenth. The nicolle is lutheran. If something is destined and abranchial then it is not lutheran. If something is eighteenth then it is not lutheran. The nicolle likes the nicolle.", "logic": "\nDestined(nicolle)\nnot Abranchial(nicolle)\nEvocative(nicolle)\nnot Eighteenth(nicolle)\nLutheran(nicolle)\nforall x (Destined(x) and Abranchial(x) -> not Lutheran(x))\nforall x (Eighteenth(x) -> not Lutheran(x))\n\nLikes(nicolle, nicolle)\n\nLikes(nicolle, nicolle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5756"} {"premises": "The husein stalinize the maud. The husein research the roxana. The husein is laudatory. The husein does not like the maud. The husein unleash the roxana. The maud unleash the roxana. The roxana does not eat the husein. The roxana research the maud. The roxana is uncombable. The roxana is overshot. If someone stalinize the roxana and they eat the husein then the roxana is overshot. If someone stalinize the roxana and they chase the husein then the husein research the maud. If the roxana research the husein and the husein is overshot then the husein is laudatory. If someone unleash the roxana then they do not chase the husein. If someone is uncombable and they do not chase the roxana then they do not eat the roxana. If someone unleash the roxana and the roxana stalinize the maud then the maud research the husein. If the maud does not chase the husein then the maud research the roxana. If someone research the roxana then they eat the maud. The roxana is uncombable.", "logic": "\nStalinize(husein, maud)\nResearch(husein, roxana)\nLaudatory(husein)\nnot Unleash(husein, maud)\nUnleash(husein, roxana)\nUnleash(maud, roxana)\nnot Research(roxana, husein)\nResearch(roxana, maud)\nUncombable(roxana)\nOvershot(roxana)\nforall x (Stalinize(x, roxana) and Research(x, husein) -> Overshot(roxana))\nforall x (Stalinize(x, roxana) and Stalinize(x, husein) -> Research(husein, maud))\nResearch(roxana, husein) and Overshot(husein) -> Laudatory(husein)\nforall x (Unleash(x, roxana) -> not Stalinize(x, husein))\nforall x (Uncombable(x) and not Stalinize(x, roxana) -> not Research(x, roxana))\nforall x (Unleash(x, roxana) and Stalinize(roxana, maud) -> Research(maud, husein))\nnot Stalinize(maud, husein) -> Research(maud, roxana)\nforall x (Research(x, roxana) -> Research(x, maud))\n\nUncombable(roxana)\n\ntherefore Uncombable(roxana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The gertie transplant the sherilyn. The gertie typeset the laverna. The gertie is undeserved. The gertie does not like the sherilyn. The gertie cradle the laverna. The sherilyn cradle the laverna. The laverna does not eat the gertie. The laverna typeset the sherilyn. The laverna is reticular. The laverna is asynergic. If someone transplant the laverna and they eat the gertie then the laverna is asynergic. If someone transplant the laverna and they chase the gertie then the gertie typeset the sherilyn. If the laverna typeset the gertie and the gertie is asynergic then the gertie is undeserved. If someone cradle the laverna then they do not chase the gertie. If someone is reticular and they do not chase the laverna then they do not eat the laverna. If someone cradle the laverna and the laverna transplant the sherilyn then the sherilyn typeset the gertie. If the sherilyn does not chase the gertie then the sherilyn typeset the laverna. If someone typeset the laverna then they eat the sherilyn. The gertie does not chase the sherilyn.", "logic": "\nTransplant(gertie, sherilyn)\nTypeset(gertie, laverna)\nUndeserved(gertie)\nnot Cradle(gertie, sherilyn)\nCradle(gertie, laverna)\nCradle(sherilyn, laverna)\nnot Typeset(laverna, gertie)\nTypeset(laverna, sherilyn)\nReticular(laverna)\nAsynergic(laverna)\nforall x (Transplant(x, laverna) and Typeset(x, gertie) -> Asynergic(laverna))\nforall x (Transplant(x, laverna) and Transplant(x, gertie) -> Typeset(gertie, sherilyn))\nTypeset(laverna, gertie) and Asynergic(gertie) -> Undeserved(gertie)\nforall x (Cradle(x, laverna) -> not Transplant(x, gertie))\nforall x (Reticular(x) and not Transplant(x, laverna) -> not Typeset(x, laverna))\nforall x (Cradle(x, laverna) and Transplant(laverna, sherilyn) -> Typeset(sherilyn, gertie))\nnot Transplant(sherilyn, gertie) -> Typeset(sherilyn, laverna)\nforall x (Typeset(x, laverna) -> Typeset(x, sherilyn))\n\nnot Transplant(gertie, sherilyn)\n\ntherefore Transplant(gertie, sherilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The mikael exhibit the gabriell. The mikael soldier the gretchen. The mikael is carbonic. The mikael does not like the gabriell. The mikael replace the gretchen. The gabriell replace the gretchen. The gretchen does not eat the mikael. The gretchen soldier the gabriell. The gretchen is ascendible. The gretchen is irascible. If someone exhibit the gretchen and they eat the mikael then the gretchen is irascible. If someone exhibit the gretchen and they chase the mikael then the mikael soldier the gabriell. If the gretchen soldier the mikael and the mikael is irascible then the mikael is carbonic. If someone replace the gretchen then they do not chase the mikael. If someone is ascendible and they do not chase the gretchen then they do not eat the gretchen. If someone replace the gretchen and the gretchen exhibit the gabriell then the gabriell soldier the mikael. If the gabriell does not chase the mikael then the gabriell soldier the gretchen. If someone soldier the gretchen then they eat the gabriell. The mikael does not chase the mikael.", "logic": "\nExhibit(mikael, gabriell)\nSoldier(mikael, gretchen)\nCarbonic(mikael)\nnot Replace(mikael, gabriell)\nReplace(mikael, gretchen)\nReplace(gabriell, gretchen)\nnot Soldier(gretchen, mikael)\nSoldier(gretchen, gabriell)\nAscendible(gretchen)\nIrascible(gretchen)\nforall x (Exhibit(x, gretchen) and Soldier(x, mikael) -> Irascible(gretchen))\nforall x (Exhibit(x, gretchen) and Exhibit(x, mikael) -> Soldier(mikael, gabriell))\nSoldier(gretchen, mikael) and Irascible(mikael) -> Carbonic(mikael)\nforall x (Replace(x, gretchen) -> not Exhibit(x, mikael))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) and not Exhibit(x, gretchen) -> not Soldier(x, gretchen))\nforall x (Replace(x, gretchen) and Exhibit(gretchen, gabriell) -> Soldier(gabriell, mikael))\nnot Exhibit(gabriell, mikael) -> Soldier(gabriell, gretchen)\nforall x (Soldier(x, gretchen) -> Soldier(x, gabriell))\n\nnot Exhibit(mikael, mikael)\n\nReplace(mikael, gretchen) and forall x (Replace(x, gretchen) -> not Exhibit(x, mikael)) -> therefore not Exhibit(mikael, mikael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The kristy muckrake the mathilde. The kristy retroflex the carolynn. The kristy is clxxx. The kristy does not like the mathilde. The kristy reconsider the carolynn. The mathilde reconsider the carolynn. The carolynn does not eat the kristy. The carolynn retroflex the mathilde. The carolynn is tuxedoed. The carolynn is crescendo. If someone muckrake the carolynn and they eat the kristy then the carolynn is crescendo. If someone muckrake the carolynn and they chase the kristy then the kristy retroflex the mathilde. If the carolynn retroflex the kristy and the kristy is crescendo then the kristy is clxxx. If someone reconsider the carolynn then they do not chase the kristy. If someone is tuxedoed and they do not chase the carolynn then they do not eat the carolynn. If someone reconsider the carolynn and the carolynn muckrake the mathilde then the mathilde retroflex the kristy. If the mathilde does not chase the kristy then the mathilde retroflex the carolynn. If someone retroflex the carolynn then they eat the mathilde. The mathilde muckrake the kristy.", "logic": "\nMuckrake(kristy, mathilde)\nRetroflex(kristy, carolynn)\nClxxx(kristy)\nnot Reconsider(kristy, mathilde)\nReconsider(kristy, carolynn)\nReconsider(mathilde, carolynn)\nnot Retroflex(carolynn, kristy)\nRetroflex(carolynn, mathilde)\nTuxedoed(carolynn)\nCrescendo(carolynn)\nforall x (Muckrake(x, carolynn) and Retroflex(x, kristy) -> Crescendo(carolynn))\nforall x (Muckrake(x, carolynn) and Muckrake(x, kristy) -> Retroflex(kristy, mathilde))\nRetroflex(carolynn, kristy) and Crescendo(kristy) -> Clxxx(kristy)\nforall x (Reconsider(x, carolynn) -> not Muckrake(x, kristy))\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) and not Muckrake(x, carolynn) -> not Retroflex(x, carolynn))\nforall x (Reconsider(x, carolynn) and Muckrake(carolynn, mathilde) -> Retroflex(mathilde, kristy))\nnot Muckrake(mathilde, kristy) -> Retroflex(mathilde, carolynn)\nforall x (Retroflex(x, carolynn) -> Retroflex(x, mathilde))\n\nMuckrake(mathilde, kristy)\n\nReconsider(mathilde, carolynn) and forall x (Reconsider(x, carolynn) -> not Muckrake(x, kristy)) -> therefore not Muckrake(mathilde, kristy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The maynard prang the puff. The maynard cherish the adriaens. The maynard is anguillan. The maynard does not like the puff. The maynard pith the adriaens. The puff pith the adriaens. The adriaens does not eat the maynard. The adriaens cherish the puff. The adriaens is hindustani. The adriaens is untrodden. If someone prang the adriaens and they eat the maynard then the adriaens is untrodden. If someone prang the adriaens and they chase the maynard then the maynard cherish the puff. If the adriaens cherish the maynard and the maynard is untrodden then the maynard is anguillan. If someone pith the adriaens then they do not chase the maynard. If someone is hindustani and they do not chase the adriaens then they do not eat the adriaens. If someone pith the adriaens and the adriaens prang the puff then the puff cherish the maynard. If the puff does not chase the maynard then the puff cherish the adriaens. If someone cherish the adriaens then they eat the puff. The puff cherish the adriaens.", "logic": "\nPrang(maynard, puff)\nCherish(maynard, adriaens)\nAnguillan(maynard)\nnot Pith(maynard, puff)\nPith(maynard, adriaens)\nPith(puff, adriaens)\nnot Cherish(adriaens, maynard)\nCherish(adriaens, puff)\nHindustani(adriaens)\nUntrodden(adriaens)\nforall x (Prang(x, adriaens) and Cherish(x, maynard) -> Untrodden(adriaens))\nforall x (Prang(x, adriaens) and Prang(x, maynard) -> Cherish(maynard, puff))\nCherish(adriaens, maynard) and Untrodden(maynard) -> Anguillan(maynard)\nforall x (Pith(x, adriaens) -> not Prang(x, maynard))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and not Prang(x, adriaens) -> not Cherish(x, adriaens))\nforall x (Pith(x, adriaens) and Prang(adriaens, puff) -> Cherish(puff, maynard))\nnot Prang(puff, maynard) -> Cherish(puff, adriaens)\nforall x (Cherish(x, adriaens) -> Cherish(x, puff))\n\nCherish(puff, adriaens)\n\nPith(puff, adriaens) and forall x (Pith(x, adriaens) -> not Prang(x, maynard)) -> therefore not Prang(puff, maynard) not Prang(puff, maynard) and not Prang(puff, maynard) -> Cherish(puff, adriaens) -> therefore Cherish(puff, adriaens)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The megen foxhunt the nina. The megen commentate the adriane. The megen is leavened. The megen does not like the nina. The megen invoice the adriane. The nina invoice the adriane. The adriane does not eat the megen. The adriane commentate the nina. The adriane is recursive. The adriane is laureled. If someone foxhunt the adriane and they eat the megen then the adriane is laureled. If someone foxhunt the adriane and they chase the megen then the megen commentate the nina. If the adriane commentate the megen and the megen is laureled then the megen is leavened. If someone invoice the adriane then they do not chase the megen. If someone is recursive and they do not chase the adriane then they do not eat the adriane. If someone invoice the adriane and the adriane foxhunt the nina then the nina commentate the megen. If the nina does not chase the megen then the nina commentate the adriane. If someone commentate the adriane then they eat the nina. The nina does not eat the adriane.", "logic": "\nFoxhunt(megen, nina)\nCommentate(megen, adriane)\nLeavened(megen)\nnot Invoice(megen, nina)\nInvoice(megen, adriane)\nInvoice(nina, adriane)\nnot Commentate(adriane, megen)\nCommentate(adriane, nina)\nRecursive(adriane)\nLaureled(adriane)\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, adriane) and Commentate(x, megen) -> Laureled(adriane))\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, adriane) and Foxhunt(x, megen) -> Commentate(megen, nina))\nCommentate(adriane, megen) and Laureled(megen) -> Leavened(megen)\nforall x (Invoice(x, adriane) -> not Foxhunt(x, megen))\nforall x (Recursive(x) and not Foxhunt(x, adriane) -> not Commentate(x, adriane))\nforall x (Invoice(x, adriane) and Foxhunt(adriane, nina) -> Commentate(nina, megen))\nnot Foxhunt(nina, megen) -> Commentate(nina, adriane)\nforall x (Commentate(x, adriane) -> Commentate(x, nina))\n\nnot Commentate(nina, adriane)\n\nInvoice(nina, adriane) and forall x (Invoice(x, adriane) -> not Foxhunt(x, megen)) -> therefore not Foxhunt(nina, megen) not Foxhunt(nina, megen) and not Foxhunt(nina, megen) -> Commentate(nina, adriane) -> therefore Commentate(nina, adriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The mufi elide the noelle. The mufi jingle the alameda. The mufi is volunteer. The mufi does not like the noelle. The mufi wilt the alameda. The noelle wilt the alameda. The alameda does not eat the mufi. The alameda jingle the noelle. The alameda is susurrant. The alameda is unbalanced. If someone elide the alameda and they eat the mufi then the alameda is unbalanced. If someone elide the alameda and they chase the mufi then the mufi jingle the noelle. If the alameda jingle the mufi and the mufi is unbalanced then the mufi is volunteer. If someone wilt the alameda then they do not chase the mufi. If someone is susurrant and they do not chase the alameda then they do not eat the alameda. If someone wilt the alameda and the alameda elide the noelle then the noelle jingle the mufi. If the noelle does not chase the mufi then the noelle jingle the alameda. If someone jingle the alameda then they eat the noelle. The noelle jingle the noelle.", "logic": "\nElide(mufi, noelle)\nJingle(mufi, alameda)\nVolunteer(mufi)\nnot Wilt(mufi, noelle)\nWilt(mufi, alameda)\nWilt(noelle, alameda)\nnot Jingle(alameda, mufi)\nJingle(alameda, noelle)\nSusurrant(alameda)\nUnbalanced(alameda)\nforall x (Elide(x, alameda) and Jingle(x, mufi) -> Unbalanced(alameda))\nforall x (Elide(x, alameda) and Elide(x, mufi) -> Jingle(mufi, noelle))\nJingle(alameda, mufi) and Unbalanced(mufi) -> Volunteer(mufi)\nforall x (Wilt(x, alameda) -> not Elide(x, mufi))\nforall x (Susurrant(x) and not Elide(x, alameda) -> not Jingle(x, alameda))\nforall x (Wilt(x, alameda) and Elide(alameda, noelle) -> Jingle(noelle, mufi))\nnot Elide(noelle, mufi) -> Jingle(noelle, alameda)\nforall x (Jingle(x, alameda) -> Jingle(x, noelle))\n\nJingle(noelle, noelle)\n\nWilt(noelle, alameda) and forall x (Wilt(x, alameda) -> not Elide(x, mufi)) -> therefore not Elide(noelle, mufi) not Elide(noelle, mufi) and not Elide(noelle, mufi) -> Jingle(noelle, alameda) -> therefore Jingle(noelle, alameda) Jingle(noelle, alameda) and forall x (Jingle(x, alameda) -> Jingle(x, noelle)) -> therefore Jingle(noelle, noelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The mika swab the baird. The mika mambo the myrlene. The mika is muzzy. The mika does not like the baird. The mika kennel the myrlene. The baird kennel the myrlene. The myrlene does not eat the mika. The myrlene mambo the baird. The myrlene is chordal. The myrlene is interim. If someone swab the myrlene and they eat the mika then the myrlene is interim. If someone swab the myrlene and they chase the mika then the mika mambo the baird. If the myrlene mambo the mika and the mika is interim then the mika is muzzy. If someone kennel the myrlene then they do not chase the mika. If someone is chordal and they do not chase the myrlene then they do not eat the myrlene. If someone kennel the myrlene and the myrlene swab the baird then the baird mambo the mika. If the baird does not chase the mika then the baird mambo the myrlene. If someone mambo the myrlene then they eat the baird. The baird does not eat the baird.", "logic": "\nSwab(mika, baird)\nMambo(mika, myrlene)\nMuzzy(mika)\nnot Kennel(mika, baird)\nKennel(mika, myrlene)\nKennel(baird, myrlene)\nnot Mambo(myrlene, mika)\nMambo(myrlene, baird)\nChordal(myrlene)\nInterim(myrlene)\nforall x (Swab(x, myrlene) and Mambo(x, mika) -> Interim(myrlene))\nforall x (Swab(x, myrlene) and Swab(x, mika) -> Mambo(mika, baird))\nMambo(myrlene, mika) and Interim(mika) -> Muzzy(mika)\nforall x (Kennel(x, myrlene) -> not Swab(x, mika))\nforall x (Chordal(x) and not Swab(x, myrlene) -> not Mambo(x, myrlene))\nforall x (Kennel(x, myrlene) and Swab(myrlene, baird) -> Mambo(baird, mika))\nnot Swab(baird, mika) -> Mambo(baird, myrlene)\nforall x (Mambo(x, myrlene) -> Mambo(x, baird))\n\nnot Mambo(baird, baird)\n\nKennel(baird, myrlene) and forall x (Kennel(x, myrlene) -> not Swab(x, mika)) -> therefore not Swab(baird, mika) not Swab(baird, mika) and not Swab(baird, mika) -> Mambo(baird, myrlene) -> therefore Mambo(baird, myrlene) Mambo(baird, myrlene) and forall x (Mambo(x, myrlene) -> Mambo(x, baird)) -> therefore Mambo(baird, baird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The almeta fillet the edgardo. The almeta inundate the dorene. The almeta is scorched. The almeta does not like the edgardo. The almeta beautify the dorene. The edgardo beautify the dorene. The dorene does not eat the almeta. The dorene inundate the edgardo. The dorene is cantabile. The dorene is thoughtful. If someone fillet the dorene and they eat the almeta then the dorene is thoughtful. If someone fillet the dorene and they chase the almeta then the almeta inundate the edgardo. If the dorene inundate the almeta and the almeta is thoughtful then the almeta is scorched. If someone beautify the dorene then they do not chase the almeta. If someone is cantabile and they do not chase the dorene then they do not eat the dorene. If someone beautify the dorene and the dorene fillet the edgardo then the edgardo inundate the almeta. If the edgardo does not chase the almeta then the edgardo inundate the dorene. If someone inundate the dorene then they eat the edgardo. The edgardo does not eat the almeta.", "logic": "\nFillet(almeta, edgardo)\nInundate(almeta, dorene)\nScorched(almeta)\nnot Beautify(almeta, edgardo)\nBeautify(almeta, dorene)\nBeautify(edgardo, dorene)\nnot Inundate(dorene, almeta)\nInundate(dorene, edgardo)\nCantabile(dorene)\nThoughtful(dorene)\nforall x (Fillet(x, dorene) and Inundate(x, almeta) -> Thoughtful(dorene))\nforall x (Fillet(x, dorene) and Fillet(x, almeta) -> Inundate(almeta, edgardo))\nInundate(dorene, almeta) and Thoughtful(almeta) -> Scorched(almeta)\nforall x (Beautify(x, dorene) -> not Fillet(x, almeta))\nforall x (Cantabile(x) and not Fillet(x, dorene) -> not Inundate(x, dorene))\nforall x (Beautify(x, dorene) and Fillet(dorene, edgardo) -> Inundate(edgardo, almeta))\nnot Fillet(edgardo, almeta) -> Inundate(edgardo, dorene)\nforall x (Inundate(x, dorene) -> Inundate(x, edgardo))\n\nnot Inundate(edgardo, almeta)\n\nforall x (Beautify(x, dorene) and Fillet(dorene, edgardo) -> Inundate(edgardo, almeta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The johnathan nuzzle the dynah. The johnathan featherbed the laila. The johnathan is runproof. The johnathan does not like the dynah. The johnathan resubmit the laila. The dynah resubmit the laila. The laila does not eat the johnathan. The laila featherbed the dynah. The laila is slicked. The laila is grumous. If someone nuzzle the laila and they eat the johnathan then the laila is grumous. If someone nuzzle the laila and they chase the johnathan then the johnathan featherbed the dynah. If the laila featherbed the johnathan and the johnathan is grumous then the johnathan is runproof. If someone resubmit the laila then they do not chase the johnathan. If someone is slicked and they do not chase the laila then they do not eat the laila. If someone resubmit the laila and the laila nuzzle the dynah then the dynah featherbed the johnathan. If the dynah does not chase the johnathan then the dynah featherbed the laila. If someone featherbed the laila then they eat the dynah. The laila featherbed the laila.", "logic": "\nNuzzle(johnathan, dynah)\nFeatherbed(johnathan, laila)\nRunproof(johnathan)\nnot Resubmit(johnathan, dynah)\nResubmit(johnathan, laila)\nResubmit(dynah, laila)\nnot Featherbed(laila, johnathan)\nFeatherbed(laila, dynah)\nSlicked(laila)\nGrumous(laila)\nforall x (Nuzzle(x, laila) and Featherbed(x, johnathan) -> Grumous(laila))\nforall x (Nuzzle(x, laila) and Nuzzle(x, johnathan) -> Featherbed(johnathan, dynah))\nFeatherbed(laila, johnathan) and Grumous(johnathan) -> Runproof(johnathan)\nforall x (Resubmit(x, laila) -> not Nuzzle(x, johnathan))\nforall x (Slicked(x) and not Nuzzle(x, laila) -> not Featherbed(x, laila))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, laila) and Nuzzle(laila, dynah) -> Featherbed(dynah, johnathan))\nnot Nuzzle(dynah, johnathan) -> Featherbed(dynah, laila)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, laila) -> Featherbed(x, dynah))\n\nFeatherbed(laila, laila)\n\nFeatherbed(laila, laila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The averyl saccharify the jacki. The averyl undersell the garvey. The averyl is anurous. The averyl does not like the jacki. The averyl boat the garvey. The jacki boat the garvey. The garvey does not eat the averyl. The garvey undersell the jacki. The garvey is welcome. The garvey is redbrick. If someone saccharify the garvey and they eat the averyl then the garvey is redbrick. If someone saccharify the garvey and they chase the averyl then the averyl undersell the jacki. If the garvey undersell the averyl and the averyl is redbrick then the averyl is anurous. If someone boat the garvey then they do not chase the averyl. If someone is welcome and they do not chase the garvey then they do not eat the garvey. If someone boat the garvey and the garvey saccharify the jacki then the jacki undersell the averyl. If the jacki does not chase the averyl then the jacki undersell the garvey. If someone undersell the garvey then they eat the jacki. The jacki is not young.", "logic": "\nSaccharify(averyl, jacki)\nUndersell(averyl, garvey)\nAnurous(averyl)\nnot Boat(averyl, jacki)\nBoat(averyl, garvey)\nBoat(jacki, garvey)\nnot Undersell(garvey, averyl)\nUndersell(garvey, jacki)\nWelcome(garvey)\nRedbrick(garvey)\nforall x (Saccharify(x, garvey) and Undersell(x, averyl) -> Redbrick(garvey))\nforall x (Saccharify(x, garvey) and Saccharify(x, averyl) -> Undersell(averyl, jacki))\nUndersell(garvey, averyl) and Redbrick(averyl) -> Anurous(averyl)\nforall x (Boat(x, garvey) -> not Saccharify(x, averyl))\nforall x (Welcome(x) and not Saccharify(x, garvey) -> not Undersell(x, garvey))\nforall x (Boat(x, garvey) and Saccharify(garvey, jacki) -> Undersell(jacki, averyl))\nnot Saccharify(jacki, averyl) -> Undersell(jacki, garvey)\nforall x (Undersell(x, garvey) -> Undersell(x, jacki))\n\nnot Young(jacki)\n\nnot Young(jacki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The abel cypher the gillian. The abel garrison the kendra. The abel is serpentine. The abel does not like the gillian. The abel waken the kendra. The gillian waken the kendra. The kendra does not eat the abel. The kendra garrison the gillian. The kendra is suspended. The kendra is remedial. If someone cypher the kendra and they eat the abel then the kendra is remedial. If someone cypher the kendra and they chase the abel then the abel garrison the gillian. If the kendra garrison the abel and the abel is remedial then the abel is serpentine. If someone waken the kendra then they do not chase the abel. If someone is suspended and they do not chase the kendra then they do not eat the kendra. If someone waken the kendra and the kendra cypher the gillian then the gillian garrison the abel. If the gillian does not chase the abel then the gillian garrison the kendra. If someone garrison the kendra then they eat the gillian. The abel is suspended.", "logic": "\nCypher(abel, gillian)\nGarrison(abel, kendra)\nSerpentine(abel)\nnot Waken(abel, gillian)\nWaken(abel, kendra)\nWaken(gillian, kendra)\nnot Garrison(kendra, abel)\nGarrison(kendra, gillian)\nSuspended(kendra)\nRemedial(kendra)\nforall x (Cypher(x, kendra) and Garrison(x, abel) -> Remedial(kendra))\nforall x (Cypher(x, kendra) and Cypher(x, abel) -> Garrison(abel, gillian))\nGarrison(kendra, abel) and Remedial(abel) -> Serpentine(abel)\nforall x (Waken(x, kendra) -> not Cypher(x, abel))\nforall x (Suspended(x) and not Cypher(x, kendra) -> not Garrison(x, kendra))\nforall x (Waken(x, kendra) and Cypher(kendra, gillian) -> Garrison(gillian, abel))\nnot Cypher(gillian, abel) -> Garrison(gillian, kendra)\nforall x (Garrison(x, kendra) -> Garrison(x, gillian))\n\nSuspended(abel)\n\nSuspended(abel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The xena subvention the aubrey. The xena moot the torrance. The xena is cardinal. The xena does not like the aubrey. The xena underquote the torrance. The aubrey underquote the torrance. The torrance does not eat the xena. The torrance moot the aubrey. The torrance is antebellum. The torrance is uninspired. If someone subvention the torrance and they eat the xena then the torrance is uninspired. If someone subvention the torrance and they chase the xena then the xena moot the aubrey. If the torrance moot the xena and the xena is uninspired then the xena is cardinal. If someone underquote the torrance then they do not chase the xena. If someone is antebellum and they do not chase the torrance then they do not eat the torrance. If someone underquote the torrance and the torrance subvention the aubrey then the aubrey moot the xena. If the aubrey does not chase the xena then the aubrey moot the torrance. If someone moot the torrance then they eat the aubrey. The xena is not uninspired.", "logic": "\nSubvention(xena, aubrey)\nMoot(xena, torrance)\nCardinal(xena)\nnot Underquote(xena, aubrey)\nUnderquote(xena, torrance)\nUnderquote(aubrey, torrance)\nnot Moot(torrance, xena)\nMoot(torrance, aubrey)\nAntebellum(torrance)\nUninspired(torrance)\nforall x (Subvention(x, torrance) and Moot(x, xena) -> Uninspired(torrance))\nforall x (Subvention(x, torrance) and Subvention(x, xena) -> Moot(xena, aubrey))\nMoot(torrance, xena) and Uninspired(xena) -> Cardinal(xena)\nforall x (Underquote(x, torrance) -> not Subvention(x, xena))\nforall x (Antebellum(x) and not Subvention(x, torrance) -> not Moot(x, torrance))\nforall x (Underquote(x, torrance) and Subvention(torrance, aubrey) -> Moot(aubrey, xena))\nnot Subvention(aubrey, xena) -> Moot(aubrey, torrance)\nforall x (Moot(x, torrance) -> Moot(x, aubrey))\n\nnot Uninspired(xena)\n\nnot Uninspired(xena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The tarra croquet the claudetta. The tarra redo the urson. The tarra is cruciate. The tarra does not like the claudetta. The tarra hatchel the urson. The claudetta hatchel the urson. The urson does not eat the tarra. The urson redo the claudetta. The urson is deserving. The urson is glassy. If someone croquet the urson and they eat the tarra then the urson is glassy. If someone croquet the urson and they chase the tarra then the tarra redo the claudetta. If the urson redo the tarra and the tarra is glassy then the tarra is cruciate. If someone hatchel the urson then they do not chase the tarra. If someone is deserving and they do not chase the urson then they do not eat the urson. If someone hatchel the urson and the urson croquet the claudetta then the claudetta redo the tarra. If the claudetta does not chase the tarra then the claudetta redo the urson. If someone redo the urson then they eat the claudetta. The tarra croquet the urson.", "logic": "\nCroquet(tarra, claudetta)\nRedo(tarra, urson)\nCruciate(tarra)\nnot Hatchel(tarra, claudetta)\nHatchel(tarra, urson)\nHatchel(claudetta, urson)\nnot Redo(urson, tarra)\nRedo(urson, claudetta)\nDeserving(urson)\nGlassy(urson)\nforall x (Croquet(x, urson) and Redo(x, tarra) -> Glassy(urson))\nforall x (Croquet(x, urson) and Croquet(x, tarra) -> Redo(tarra, claudetta))\nRedo(urson, tarra) and Glassy(tarra) -> Cruciate(tarra)\nforall x (Hatchel(x, urson) -> not Croquet(x, tarra))\nforall x (Deserving(x) and not Croquet(x, urson) -> not Redo(x, urson))\nforall x (Hatchel(x, urson) and Croquet(urson, claudetta) -> Redo(claudetta, tarra))\nnot Croquet(claudetta, tarra) -> Redo(claudetta, urson)\nforall x (Redo(x, urson) -> Redo(x, claudetta))\n\nCroquet(tarra, urson)\n\nCroquet(tarra, urson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The tori digitalize the dyanna. The tori backhand the gaston. The tori is nonsweet. The tori does not like the dyanna. The tori calcine the gaston. The dyanna calcine the gaston. The gaston does not eat the tori. The gaston backhand the dyanna. The gaston is peremptory. The gaston is horary. If someone digitalize the gaston and they eat the tori then the gaston is horary. If someone digitalize the gaston and they chase the tori then the tori backhand the dyanna. If the gaston backhand the tori and the tori is horary then the tori is nonsweet. If someone calcine the gaston then they do not chase the tori. If someone is peremptory and they do not chase the gaston then they do not eat the gaston. If someone calcine the gaston and the gaston digitalize the dyanna then the dyanna backhand the tori. If the dyanna does not chase the tori then the dyanna backhand the gaston. If someone backhand the gaston then they eat the dyanna. The tori is not green.", "logic": "\nDigitalize(tori, dyanna)\nBackhand(tori, gaston)\nNonsweet(tori)\nnot Calcine(tori, dyanna)\nCalcine(tori, gaston)\nCalcine(dyanna, gaston)\nnot Backhand(gaston, tori)\nBackhand(gaston, dyanna)\nPeremptory(gaston)\nHorary(gaston)\nforall x (Digitalize(x, gaston) and Backhand(x, tori) -> Horary(gaston))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, gaston) and Digitalize(x, tori) -> Backhand(tori, dyanna))\nBackhand(gaston, tori) and Horary(tori) -> Nonsweet(tori)\nforall x (Calcine(x, gaston) -> not Digitalize(x, tori))\nforall x (Peremptory(x) and not Digitalize(x, gaston) -> not Backhand(x, gaston))\nforall x (Calcine(x, gaston) and Digitalize(gaston, dyanna) -> Backhand(dyanna, tori))\nnot Digitalize(dyanna, tori) -> Backhand(dyanna, gaston)\nforall x (Backhand(x, gaston) -> Backhand(x, dyanna))\n\nnot Green(tori)\n\nnot Green(tori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "The trudi gear the lynnette. The trudi surround the bella. The trudi is shintoist. The trudi does not like the lynnette. The trudi bandage the bella. The lynnette bandage the bella. The bella does not eat the trudi. The bella surround the lynnette. The bella is deceitful. The bella is hopeful. If someone gear the bella and they eat the trudi then the bella is hopeful. If someone gear the bella and they chase the trudi then the trudi surround the lynnette. If the bella surround the trudi and the trudi is hopeful then the trudi is shintoist. If someone bandage the bella then they do not chase the trudi. If someone is deceitful and they do not chase the bella then they do not eat the bella. If someone bandage the bella and the bella gear the lynnette then the lynnette surround the trudi. If the lynnette does not chase the trudi then the lynnette surround the bella. If someone surround the bella then they eat the lynnette. The bella is young.", "logic": "\nGear(trudi, lynnette)\nSurround(trudi, bella)\nShintoist(trudi)\nnot Bandage(trudi, lynnette)\nBandage(trudi, bella)\nBandage(lynnette, bella)\nnot Surround(bella, trudi)\nSurround(bella, lynnette)\nDeceitful(bella)\nHopeful(bella)\nforall x (Gear(x, bella) and Surround(x, trudi) -> Hopeful(bella))\nforall x (Gear(x, bella) and Gear(x, trudi) -> Surround(trudi, lynnette))\nSurround(bella, trudi) and Hopeful(trudi) -> Shintoist(trudi)\nforall x (Bandage(x, bella) -> not Gear(x, trudi))\nforall x (Deceitful(x) and not Gear(x, bella) -> not Surround(x, bella))\nforall x (Bandage(x, bella) and Gear(bella, lynnette) -> Surround(lynnette, trudi))\nnot Gear(lynnette, trudi) -> Surround(lynnette, bella)\nforall x (Surround(x, bella) -> Surround(x, lynnette))\n\nYoung(bella)\n\nYoung(bella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-924"} {"premises": "Cherri is sissy. Cherri is monumental. Cherri is endless. Cherri is not unsuitable. Cherri is endovenous. Douglass is sissy. Douglass is unsuitable. Talbot is not monumental. Talbot is endless. Talbot is endovenous. Nolan is unsuitable. Nolan is endovenous. Quiet people are monumental. If Douglass is monumental then Douglass is not endovenous. If someone is fortemente and not unsuitable then they are endovenous. If someone is endless then they are timid. If someone is sissy and not endovenous then they are timid. If someone is endovenous and not sissy then they are timid. Douglass is unsuitable.", "logic": "\nSissy(cherri)\nMonumental(cherri)\nEndless(cherri)\nnot Unsuitable(cherri)\nEndovenous(cherri)\nSissy(douglass)\nUnsuitable(douglass)\nnot Monumental(talbot)\nEndless(talbot)\nEndovenous(talbot)\nUnsuitable(nolan)\nEndovenous(nolan)\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Monumental(x))\nMonumental(douglass) -> not Endovenous(douglass)\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and not Unsuitable(x) -> Endovenous(x))\nforall x (Endless(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Sissy(x) and not Endovenous(x) -> Timid(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and not Sissy(x) -> Timid(x))\n\nUnsuitable(douglass)\n\ntherefore Unsuitable(douglass)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Isabelita is minty. Isabelita is even. Isabelita is expensive. Isabelita is not reasoned. Isabelita is airheaded. Steffen is minty. Steffen is reasoned. Melonie is not even. Melonie is expensive. Melonie is airheaded. Theada is reasoned. Theada is airheaded. Quiet people are even. If Steffen is even then Steffen is not airheaded. If someone is monitory and not reasoned then they are airheaded. If someone is expensive then they are greek. If someone is minty and not airheaded then they are greek. If someone is airheaded and not minty then they are greek. Isabelita is reasoned.", "logic": "\nMinty(isabelita)\nEven(isabelita)\nExpensive(isabelita)\nnot Reasoned(isabelita)\nAirheaded(isabelita)\nMinty(steffen)\nReasoned(steffen)\nnot Even(melonie)\nExpensive(melonie)\nAirheaded(melonie)\nReasoned(theada)\nAirheaded(theada)\nforall x (Reasoned(x) -> Even(x))\nEven(steffen) -> not Airheaded(steffen)\nforall x (Monitory(x) and not Reasoned(x) -> Airheaded(x))\nforall x (Expensive(x) -> Greek(x))\nforall x (Minty(x) and not Airheaded(x) -> Greek(x))\nforall x (Airheaded(x) and not Minty(x) -> Greek(x))\n\nReasoned(isabelita)\n\ntherefore not Reasoned(isabelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Amandy is slashing. Amandy is captivated. Amandy is arbitrary. Amandy is not insidious. Amandy is peeled. Shawna is slashing. Shawna is insidious. Joya is not captivated. Joya is arbitrary. Joya is peeled. Mickie is insidious. Mickie is peeled. Quiet people are captivated. If Shawna is captivated then Shawna is not peeled. If someone is continuant and not insidious then they are peeled. If someone is arbitrary then they are congenial. If someone is slashing and not peeled then they are congenial. If someone is peeled and not slashing then they are congenial. Joya is congenial.", "logic": "\nSlashing(amandy)\nCaptivated(amandy)\nArbitrary(amandy)\nnot Insidious(amandy)\nPeeled(amandy)\nSlashing(shawna)\nInsidious(shawna)\nnot Captivated(joya)\nArbitrary(joya)\nPeeled(joya)\nInsidious(mickie)\nPeeled(mickie)\nforall x (Insidious(x) -> Captivated(x))\nCaptivated(shawna) -> not Peeled(shawna)\nforall x (Continuant(x) and not Insidious(x) -> Peeled(x))\nforall x (Arbitrary(x) -> Congenial(x))\nforall x (Slashing(x) and not Peeled(x) -> Congenial(x))\nforall x (Peeled(x) and not Slashing(x) -> Congenial(x))\n\nCongenial(joya)\n\nArbitrary(joya) and forall x (Arbitrary(x) -> Congenial(x)) -> therefore Congenial(joya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Katinka is overfed. Katinka is oozing. Katinka is rushlike. Katinka is not boxlike. Katinka is styleless. Serge is overfed. Serge is boxlike. Cary is not oozing. Cary is rushlike. Cary is styleless. Patty is boxlike. Patty is styleless. Quiet people are oozing. If Serge is oozing then Serge is not styleless. If someone is cropped and not boxlike then they are styleless. If someone is rushlike then they are eurasian. If someone is overfed and not styleless then they are eurasian. If someone is styleless and not overfed then they are eurasian. Cary is not eurasian.", "logic": "\nOverfed(katinka)\nOozing(katinka)\nRushlike(katinka)\nnot Boxlike(katinka)\nStyleless(katinka)\nOverfed(serge)\nBoxlike(serge)\nnot Oozing(cary)\nRushlike(cary)\nStyleless(cary)\nBoxlike(patty)\nStyleless(patty)\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Oozing(x))\nOozing(serge) -> not Styleless(serge)\nforall x (Cropped(x) and not Boxlike(x) -> Styleless(x))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) -> Eurasian(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) and not Styleless(x) -> Eurasian(x))\nforall x (Styleless(x) and not Overfed(x) -> Eurasian(x))\n\nnot Eurasian(cary)\n\nRushlike(cary) and forall x (Rushlike(x) -> Eurasian(x)) -> therefore Eurasian(cary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Ignaz is addled. Ignaz is undreamed. Ignaz is furious. Ignaz is not decorative. Ignaz is wooded. Nertie is addled. Nertie is decorative. Tuck is not undreamed. Tuck is furious. Tuck is wooded. Rolph is decorative. Rolph is wooded. Quiet people are undreamed. If Nertie is undreamed then Nertie is not wooded. If someone is tentacular and not decorative then they are wooded. If someone is furious then they are seagoing. If someone is addled and not wooded then they are seagoing. If someone is wooded and not addled then they are seagoing. Nertie is not wooded.", "logic": "\nAddled(ignaz)\nUndreamed(ignaz)\nFurious(ignaz)\nnot Decorative(ignaz)\nWooded(ignaz)\nAddled(nertie)\nDecorative(nertie)\nnot Undreamed(tuck)\nFurious(tuck)\nWooded(tuck)\nDecorative(rolph)\nWooded(rolph)\nforall x (Decorative(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nUndreamed(nertie) -> not Wooded(nertie)\nforall x (Tentacular(x) and not Decorative(x) -> Wooded(x))\nforall x (Furious(x) -> Seagoing(x))\nforall x (Addled(x) and not Wooded(x) -> Seagoing(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) and not Addled(x) -> Seagoing(x))\n\nnot Wooded(nertie)\n\nDecorative(nertie) and forall x (Decorative(x) -> Undreamed(x)) -> therefore Undreamed(nertie) Undreamed(nertie) and Undreamed(nertie) -> not Wooded(nertie) -> therefore not Wooded(nertie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Julina is haunting. Julina is smothered. Julina is planned. Julina is not outsized. Julina is blank. Martino is haunting. Martino is outsized. Betti is not smothered. Betti is planned. Betti is blank. Tad is outsized. Tad is blank. Quiet people are smothered. If Martino is smothered then Martino is not blank. If someone is unequal and not outsized then they are blank. If someone is planned then they are horrendous. If someone is haunting and not blank then they are horrendous. If someone is blank and not haunting then they are horrendous. Martino is blank.", "logic": "\nHaunting(julina)\nSmothered(julina)\nPlanned(julina)\nnot Outsized(julina)\nBlank(julina)\nHaunting(martino)\nOutsized(martino)\nnot Smothered(betti)\nPlanned(betti)\nBlank(betti)\nOutsized(tad)\nBlank(tad)\nforall x (Outsized(x) -> Smothered(x))\nSmothered(martino) -> not Blank(martino)\nforall x (Unequal(x) and not Outsized(x) -> Blank(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Haunting(x) and not Blank(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Blank(x) and not Haunting(x) -> Horrendous(x))\n\nBlank(martino)\n\nOutsized(martino) and forall x (Outsized(x) -> Smothered(x)) -> therefore Smothered(martino) Smothered(martino) and Smothered(martino) -> not Blank(martino) -> therefore not Blank(martino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Mella is afflicted. Mella is matutinal. Mella is laborious. Mella is not gawky. Mella is dastard. Bev is afflicted. Bev is gawky. Neala is not matutinal. Neala is laborious. Neala is dastard. Marcelia is gawky. Marcelia is dastard. Quiet people are matutinal. If Bev is matutinal then Bev is not dastard. If someone is precise and not gawky then they are dastard. If someone is laborious then they are quavering. If someone is afflicted and not dastard then they are quavering. If someone is dastard and not afflicted then they are quavering. Bev is quavering.", "logic": "\nAfflicted(mella)\nMatutinal(mella)\nLaborious(mella)\nnot Gawky(mella)\nDastard(mella)\nAfflicted(bev)\nGawky(bev)\nnot Matutinal(neala)\nLaborious(neala)\nDastard(neala)\nGawky(marcelia)\nDastard(marcelia)\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Matutinal(x))\nMatutinal(bev) -> not Dastard(bev)\nforall x (Precise(x) and not Gawky(x) -> Dastard(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and not Dastard(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Dastard(x) and not Afflicted(x) -> Quavering(x))\n\nQuavering(bev)\n\nGawky(bev) and forall x (Gawky(x) -> Matutinal(x)) -> therefore Matutinal(bev) Matutinal(bev) and Matutinal(bev) -> not Dastard(bev) -> therefore not Dastard(bev) Afflicted(bev) and not Dastard(bev) and forall x (Afflicted(x) and not Dastard(x) -> Quavering(x)) -> therefore Quavering(bev)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Kingston is cornered. Kingston is logical. Kingston is vocational. Kingston is not must. Kingston is circular. Grata is cornered. Grata is must. Marci is not logical. Marci is vocational. Marci is circular. Aloysius is must. Aloysius is circular. Quiet people are logical. If Grata is logical then Grata is not circular. If someone is cypriot and not must then they are circular. If someone is vocational then they are habitable. If someone is cornered and not circular then they are habitable. If someone is circular and not cornered then they are habitable. Grata is not habitable.", "logic": "\nCornered(kingston)\nLogical(kingston)\nVocational(kingston)\nnot Must(kingston)\nCircular(kingston)\nCornered(grata)\nMust(grata)\nnot Logical(marci)\nVocational(marci)\nCircular(marci)\nMust(aloysius)\nCircular(aloysius)\nforall x (Must(x) -> Logical(x))\nLogical(grata) -> not Circular(grata)\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and not Must(x) -> Circular(x))\nforall x (Vocational(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Cornered(x) and not Circular(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Circular(x) and not Cornered(x) -> Habitable(x))\n\nnot Habitable(grata)\n\nMust(grata) and forall x (Must(x) -> Logical(x)) -> therefore Logical(grata) Logical(grata) and Logical(grata) -> not Circular(grata) -> therefore not Circular(grata) Cornered(grata) and not Circular(grata) and forall x (Cornered(x) and not Circular(x) -> Habitable(x)) -> therefore Habitable(grata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Binky is aphyllous. Binky is flamboyant. Binky is anodyne. Binky is not plumping. Binky is romish. Kimberlyn is aphyllous. Kimberlyn is plumping. Brittany is not flamboyant. Brittany is anodyne. Brittany is romish. Petra is plumping. Petra is romish. Quiet people are flamboyant. If Kimberlyn is flamboyant then Kimberlyn is not romish. If someone is starchless and not plumping then they are romish. If someone is anodyne then they are seething. If someone is aphyllous and not romish then they are seething. If someone is romish and not aphyllous then they are seething. Petra is not seething.", "logic": "\nAphyllous(binky)\nFlamboyant(binky)\nAnodyne(binky)\nnot Plumping(binky)\nRomish(binky)\nAphyllous(kimberlyn)\nPlumping(kimberlyn)\nnot Flamboyant(brittany)\nAnodyne(brittany)\nRomish(brittany)\nPlumping(petra)\nRomish(petra)\nforall x (Plumping(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\nFlamboyant(kimberlyn) -> not Romish(kimberlyn)\nforall x (Starchless(x) and not Plumping(x) -> Romish(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Seething(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) and not Romish(x) -> Seething(x))\nforall x (Romish(x) and not Aphyllous(x) -> Seething(x))\n\nnot Seething(petra)\n\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Seething(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Ansley is waiting. Ansley is cockamamy. Ansley is unsalable. Ansley is not hoar. Ansley is indistinct. Sheree is waiting. Sheree is hoar. Carli is not cockamamy. Carli is unsalable. Carli is indistinct. Shem is hoar. Shem is indistinct. Quiet people are cockamamy. If Sheree is cockamamy then Sheree is not indistinct. If someone is junoesque and not hoar then they are indistinct. If someone is unsalable then they are corruptive. If someone is waiting and not indistinct then they are corruptive. If someone is indistinct and not waiting then they are corruptive. Carli is hoar.", "logic": "\nWaiting(ansley)\nCockamamy(ansley)\nUnsalable(ansley)\nnot Hoar(ansley)\nIndistinct(ansley)\nWaiting(sheree)\nHoar(sheree)\nnot Cockamamy(carli)\nUnsalable(carli)\nIndistinct(carli)\nHoar(shem)\nIndistinct(shem)\nforall x (Hoar(x) -> Cockamamy(x))\nCockamamy(sheree) -> not Indistinct(sheree)\nforall x (Junoesque(x) and not Hoar(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Corruptive(x))\nforall x (Waiting(x) and not Indistinct(x) -> Corruptive(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) and not Waiting(x) -> Corruptive(x))\n\nHoar(carli)\n\nHoar(carli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Bunnie is imitation. Bunnie is splendid. Bunnie is ashy. Bunnie is not lengthy. Bunnie is resistant. Waverly is imitation. Waverly is lengthy. Bernette is not splendid. Bernette is ashy. Bernette is resistant. Abby is lengthy. Abby is resistant. Quiet people are splendid. If Waverly is splendid then Waverly is not resistant. If someone is skimpy and not lengthy then they are resistant. If someone is ashy then they are wigless. If someone is imitation and not resistant then they are wigless. If someone is resistant and not imitation then they are wigless. Abby is not skimpy.", "logic": "\nImitation(bunnie)\nSplendid(bunnie)\nAshy(bunnie)\nnot Lengthy(bunnie)\nResistant(bunnie)\nImitation(waverly)\nLengthy(waverly)\nnot Splendid(bernette)\nAshy(bernette)\nResistant(bernette)\nLengthy(abby)\nResistant(abby)\nforall x (Lengthy(x) -> Splendid(x))\nSplendid(waverly) -> not Resistant(waverly)\nforall x (Skimpy(x) and not Lengthy(x) -> Resistant(x))\nforall x (Ashy(x) -> Wigless(x))\nforall x (Imitation(x) and not Resistant(x) -> Wigless(x))\nforall x (Resistant(x) and not Imitation(x) -> Wigless(x))\n\nnot Skimpy(abby)\n\nnot Skimpy(abby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Jason is curtained. Jason is windup. Jason is bivalve. Jason is not chaldee. Jason is silenced. Nanette is curtained. Nanette is chaldee. Euclid is not windup. Euclid is bivalve. Euclid is silenced. Clarice is chaldee. Clarice is silenced. Quiet people are windup. If Nanette is windup then Nanette is not silenced. If someone is bandaged and not chaldee then they are silenced. If someone is bivalve then they are peremptory. If someone is curtained and not silenced then they are peremptory. If someone is silenced and not curtained then they are peremptory. Nanette is bandaged.", "logic": "\nCurtained(jason)\nWindup(jason)\nBivalve(jason)\nnot Chaldee(jason)\nSilenced(jason)\nCurtained(nanette)\nChaldee(nanette)\nnot Windup(euclid)\nBivalve(euclid)\nSilenced(euclid)\nChaldee(clarice)\nSilenced(clarice)\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Windup(x))\nWindup(nanette) -> not Silenced(nanette)\nforall x (Bandaged(x) and not Chaldee(x) -> Silenced(x))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) -> Peremptory(x))\nforall x (Curtained(x) and not Silenced(x) -> Peremptory(x))\nforall x (Silenced(x) and not Curtained(x) -> Peremptory(x))\n\nBandaged(nanette)\n\nBandaged(nanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Rozanna is german. Rozanna is kindred. Rozanna is rife. Rozanna is not nitwitted. Rozanna is drawn. Ferne is german. Ferne is nitwitted. Claudina is not kindred. Claudina is rife. Claudina is drawn. Adelice is nitwitted. Adelice is drawn. Quiet people are kindred. If Ferne is kindred then Ferne is not drawn. If someone is erasmian and not nitwitted then they are drawn. If someone is rife then they are parhelic. If someone is german and not drawn then they are parhelic. If someone is drawn and not german then they are parhelic. Claudina is not german.", "logic": "\nGerman(rozanna)\nKindred(rozanna)\nRife(rozanna)\nnot Nitwitted(rozanna)\nDrawn(rozanna)\nGerman(ferne)\nNitwitted(ferne)\nnot Kindred(claudina)\nRife(claudina)\nDrawn(claudina)\nNitwitted(adelice)\nDrawn(adelice)\nforall x (Nitwitted(x) -> Kindred(x))\nKindred(ferne) -> not Drawn(ferne)\nforall x (Erasmian(x) and not Nitwitted(x) -> Drawn(x))\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (German(x) and not Drawn(x) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (Drawn(x) and not German(x) -> Parhelic(x))\n\nnot German(claudina)\n\nnot German(claudina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Mersey is structural. Mersey is unwomanly. Mersey is disturbing. Mersey is not transfixed. Mersey is elfish. Danie is structural. Danie is transfixed. Ilysa is not unwomanly. Ilysa is disturbing. Ilysa is elfish. Noah is transfixed. Noah is elfish. Quiet people are unwomanly. If Danie is unwomanly then Danie is not elfish. If someone is polygonal and not transfixed then they are elfish. If someone is disturbing then they are sufferable. If someone is structural and not elfish then they are sufferable. If someone is elfish and not structural then they are sufferable. Danie is disturbing.", "logic": "\nStructural(mersey)\nUnwomanly(mersey)\nDisturbing(mersey)\nnot Transfixed(mersey)\nElfish(mersey)\nStructural(danie)\nTransfixed(danie)\nnot Unwomanly(ilysa)\nDisturbing(ilysa)\nElfish(ilysa)\nTransfixed(noah)\nElfish(noah)\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> Unwomanly(x))\nUnwomanly(danie) -> not Elfish(danie)\nforall x (Polygonal(x) and not Transfixed(x) -> Elfish(x))\nforall x (Disturbing(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Structural(x) and not Elfish(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) and not Structural(x) -> Sufferable(x))\n\nDisturbing(danie)\n\nDisturbing(danie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Arlyn is olivelike. Arlyn is rhythmic. Arlyn is undue. Arlyn is not dated. Arlyn is gravelly. Novelia is olivelike. Novelia is dated. Carlyn is not rhythmic. Carlyn is undue. Carlyn is gravelly. Bambie is dated. Bambie is gravelly. Quiet people are rhythmic. If Novelia is rhythmic then Novelia is not gravelly. If someone is minacious and not dated then they are gravelly. If someone is undue then they are unlaced. If someone is olivelike and not gravelly then they are unlaced. If someone is gravelly and not olivelike then they are unlaced. Carlyn is not minacious.", "logic": "\nOlivelike(arlyn)\nRhythmic(arlyn)\nUndue(arlyn)\nnot Dated(arlyn)\nGravelly(arlyn)\nOlivelike(novelia)\nDated(novelia)\nnot Rhythmic(carlyn)\nUndue(carlyn)\nGravelly(carlyn)\nDated(bambie)\nGravelly(bambie)\nforall x (Dated(x) -> Rhythmic(x))\nRhythmic(novelia) -> not Gravelly(novelia)\nforall x (Minacious(x) and not Dated(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Undue(x) -> Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Olivelike(x) and not Gravelly(x) -> Unlaced(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) and not Olivelike(x) -> Unlaced(x))\n\nnot Minacious(carlyn)\n\nnot Minacious(carlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "Suzetta is wavelike. Suzetta is afoul. Suzetta is almighty. Suzetta is not authorial. Suzetta is akin. Lucilia is wavelike. Lucilia is authorial. Douglas is not afoul. Douglas is almighty. Douglas is akin. Charmion is authorial. Charmion is akin. Quiet people are afoul. If Lucilia is afoul then Lucilia is not akin. If someone is stifled and not authorial then they are akin. If someone is almighty then they are osmotic. If someone is wavelike and not akin then they are osmotic. If someone is akin and not wavelike then they are osmotic. Suzetta is stifled.", "logic": "\nWavelike(suzetta)\nAfoul(suzetta)\nAlmighty(suzetta)\nnot Authorial(suzetta)\nAkin(suzetta)\nWavelike(lucilia)\nAuthorial(lucilia)\nnot Afoul(douglas)\nAlmighty(douglas)\nAkin(douglas)\nAuthorial(charmion)\nAkin(charmion)\nforall x (Authorial(x) -> Afoul(x))\nAfoul(lucilia) -> not Akin(lucilia)\nforall x (Stifled(x) and not Authorial(x) -> Akin(x))\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and not Akin(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Akin(x) and not Wavelike(x) -> Osmotic(x))\n\nStifled(suzetta)\n\nStifled(suzetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-42"} {"premises": "The baldwin is jural. If the baldwin is egoistical and the baldwin is cloddish then the baldwin is diluvian. If the baldwin is jural then the baldwin is egoistical. Big people are diluvian. All semiformal, egoistical people are jural. All diluvian people are jural. Red, jural people are semiformal. The baldwin is jural.", "logic": "\nJural(baldwin)\nEgoistical(baldwin) and Cloddish(baldwin) -> Diluvian(baldwin)\nJural(baldwin) -> Egoistical(baldwin)\nforall x (Semiformal(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Semiformal(x) and Egoistical(x) -> Jural(x))\nforall x (Diluvian(x) -> Jural(x))\nforall x (Egoistical(x) and Jural(x) -> Semiformal(x))\n\nJural(baldwin)\n\ntherefore Jural(baldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The lorelle is effortful. If the lorelle is allylic and the lorelle is erring then the lorelle is selfish. If the lorelle is effortful then the lorelle is allylic. Big people are selfish. All wideband, allylic people are effortful. All selfish people are effortful. Red, effortful people are wideband. The lorelle is not effortful.", "logic": "\nEffortful(lorelle)\nAllylic(lorelle) and Erring(lorelle) -> Selfish(lorelle)\nEffortful(lorelle) -> Allylic(lorelle)\nforall x (Wideband(x) -> Selfish(x))\nforall x (Wideband(x) and Allylic(x) -> Effortful(x))\nforall x (Selfish(x) -> Effortful(x))\nforall x (Allylic(x) and Effortful(x) -> Wideband(x))\n\nnot Effortful(lorelle)\n\ntherefore Effortful(lorelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The erhart is oldline. If the erhart is woeful and the erhart is isopteran then the erhart is amyloidal. If the erhart is oldline then the erhart is woeful. Big people are amyloidal. All edgeless, woeful people are oldline. All amyloidal people are oldline. Red, oldline people are edgeless. The erhart is woeful.", "logic": "\nOldline(erhart)\nWoeful(erhart) and Isopteran(erhart) -> Amyloidal(erhart)\nOldline(erhart) -> Woeful(erhart)\nforall x (Edgeless(x) -> Amyloidal(x))\nforall x (Edgeless(x) and Woeful(x) -> Oldline(x))\nforall x (Amyloidal(x) -> Oldline(x))\nforall x (Woeful(x) and Oldline(x) -> Edgeless(x))\n\nWoeful(erhart)\n\nOldline(erhart) and Oldline(erhart) -> Woeful(erhart) -> therefore Woeful(erhart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The damaris is sinistral. If the damaris is voltarean and the damaris is clubfooted then the damaris is unwounded. If the damaris is sinistral then the damaris is voltarean. Big people are unwounded. All oscine, voltarean people are sinistral. All unwounded people are sinistral. Red, sinistral people are oscine. The damaris is not voltarean.", "logic": "\nSinistral(damaris)\nVoltarean(damaris) and Clubfooted(damaris) -> Unwounded(damaris)\nSinistral(damaris) -> Voltarean(damaris)\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) and Voltarean(x) -> Sinistral(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) -> Sinistral(x))\nforall x (Voltarean(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Oscine(x))\n\nnot Voltarean(damaris)\n\nSinistral(damaris) and Sinistral(damaris) -> Voltarean(damaris) -> therefore Voltarean(damaris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The shelba is exodontic. If the shelba is unaired and the shelba is resinlike then the shelba is gutless. If the shelba is exodontic then the shelba is unaired. Big people are gutless. All manorial, unaired people are exodontic. All gutless people are exodontic. Red, exodontic people are manorial. The shelba is manorial.", "logic": "\nExodontic(shelba)\nUnaired(shelba) and Resinlike(shelba) -> Gutless(shelba)\nExodontic(shelba) -> Unaired(shelba)\nforall x (Manorial(x) -> Gutless(x))\nforall x (Manorial(x) and Unaired(x) -> Exodontic(x))\nforall x (Gutless(x) -> Exodontic(x))\nforall x (Unaired(x) and Exodontic(x) -> Manorial(x))\n\nManorial(shelba)\n\nExodontic(shelba) and Exodontic(shelba) -> Unaired(shelba) -> therefore Unaired(shelba) Unaired(shelba) and Exodontic(shelba) and forall x (Unaired(x) and Exodontic(x) -> Manorial(x)) -> therefore Manorial(shelba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The clarisa is external. If the clarisa is pappose and the clarisa is prima then the clarisa is unready. If the clarisa is external then the clarisa is pappose. Big people are unready. All preset, pappose people are external. All unready people are external. Red, external people are preset. The clarisa is not preset.", "logic": "\nExternal(clarisa)\nPappose(clarisa) and Prima(clarisa) -> Unready(clarisa)\nExternal(clarisa) -> Pappose(clarisa)\nforall x (Preset(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Preset(x) and Pappose(x) -> External(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) -> External(x))\nforall x (Pappose(x) and External(x) -> Preset(x))\n\nnot Preset(clarisa)\n\nExternal(clarisa) and External(clarisa) -> Pappose(clarisa) -> therefore Pappose(clarisa) Pappose(clarisa) and External(clarisa) and forall x (Pappose(x) and External(x) -> Preset(x)) -> therefore Preset(clarisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The nick is exhausted. If the nick is buteonine and the nick is pejorative then the nick is tortured. If the nick is exhausted then the nick is buteonine. Big people are tortured. All chaldaean, buteonine people are exhausted. All tortured people are exhausted. Red, exhausted people are chaldaean. The nick is tortured.", "logic": "\nExhausted(nick)\nButeonine(nick) and Pejorative(nick) -> Tortured(nick)\nExhausted(nick) -> Buteonine(nick)\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) and Buteonine(x) -> Exhausted(x))\nforall x (Tortured(x) -> Exhausted(x))\nforall x (Buteonine(x) and Exhausted(x) -> Chaldaean(x))\n\nTortured(nick)\n\nExhausted(nick) and Exhausted(nick) -> Buteonine(nick) -> therefore Buteonine(nick) Buteonine(nick) and Exhausted(nick) and forall x (Buteonine(x) and Exhausted(x) -> Chaldaean(x)) -> therefore Chaldaean(nick) Chaldaean(nick) and forall x (Chaldaean(x) -> Tortured(x)) -> therefore Tortured(nick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The barty is aperiodic. If the barty is subjugable and the barty is leaved then the barty is formalised. If the barty is aperiodic then the barty is subjugable. Big people are formalised. All elastic, subjugable people are aperiodic. All formalised people are aperiodic. Red, aperiodic people are elastic. The barty is not formalised.", "logic": "\nAperiodic(barty)\nSubjugable(barty) and Leaved(barty) -> Formalised(barty)\nAperiodic(barty) -> Subjugable(barty)\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) and Subjugable(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Subjugable(x) and Aperiodic(x) -> Elastic(x))\n\nnot Formalised(barty)\n\nAperiodic(barty) and Aperiodic(barty) -> Subjugable(barty) -> therefore Subjugable(barty) Subjugable(barty) and Aperiodic(barty) and forall x (Subjugable(x) and Aperiodic(x) -> Elastic(x)) -> therefore Elastic(barty) Elastic(barty) and forall x (Elastic(x) -> Formalised(x)) -> therefore Formalised(barty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The gerrard is devouring. If the gerrard is victimised and the gerrard is katari then the gerrard is safe. If the gerrard is devouring then the gerrard is victimised. Big people are safe. All cathedral, victimised people are devouring. All safe people are devouring. Red, devouring people are cathedral. The gerrard does not eat the gerrard.", "logic": "\nDevouring(gerrard)\nVictimised(gerrard) and Katari(gerrard) -> Safe(gerrard)\nDevouring(gerrard) -> Victimised(gerrard)\nforall x (Cathedral(x) -> Safe(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Victimised(x) -> Devouring(x))\nforall x (Safe(x) -> Devouring(x))\nforall x (Victimised(x) and Devouring(x) -> Cathedral(x))\n\nnot Eats(gerrard, gerrard)\n\nnot Eats(gerrard, gerrard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The domenico is unentitled. If the domenico is burry and the domenico is xxxi then the domenico is shapeless. If the domenico is unentitled then the domenico is burry. Big people are shapeless. All different, burry people are unentitled. All shapeless people are unentitled. Red, unentitled people are different. The domenico visits the domenico.", "logic": "\nUnentitled(domenico)\nBurry(domenico) and Xxxi(domenico) -> Shapeless(domenico)\nUnentitled(domenico) -> Burry(domenico)\nforall x (Different(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Different(x) and Burry(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Shapeless(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Burry(x) and Unentitled(x) -> Different(x))\n\nVisits(domenico, domenico)\n\nVisits(domenico, domenico) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The ruthi is resinous. If the ruthi is jacobean and the ruthi is masoretic then the ruthi is detestable. If the ruthi is resinous then the ruthi is jacobean. Big people are detestable. All apparent, jacobean people are resinous. All detestable people are resinous. Red, resinous people are apparent. The ruthi does not like the ruthi.", "logic": "\nResinous(ruthi)\nJacobean(ruthi) and Masoretic(ruthi) -> Detestable(ruthi)\nResinous(ruthi) -> Jacobean(ruthi)\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Detestable(x))\nforall x (Apparent(x) and Jacobean(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Detestable(x) -> Resinous(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) and Resinous(x) -> Apparent(x))\n\nnot Likes(ruthi, ruthi)\n\nnot Likes(ruthi, ruthi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The claudie is glistening. If the claudie is tractile and the claudie is indonesian then the claudie is unfunded. If the claudie is glistening then the claudie is tractile. Big people are unfunded. All sanguinary, tractile people are glistening. All unfunded people are glistening. Red, glistening people are sanguinary. The claudie is indonesian.", "logic": "\nGlistening(claudie)\nTractile(claudie) and Indonesian(claudie) -> Unfunded(claudie)\nGlistening(claudie) -> Tractile(claudie)\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) and Tractile(x) -> Glistening(x))\nforall x (Unfunded(x) -> Glistening(x))\nforall x (Tractile(x) and Glistening(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\n\nIndonesian(claudie)\n\nIndonesian(claudie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-196"} {"premises": "The barret rubify the jobye. The carolina is catarrhine. The jobye rubify the carolina. If someone rubify the carolina then they are sacrosanct. If someone rubify the barret and they visit the jobye then they visit the barret. If someone wolf the barret then they visit the jobye. If someone is sacrosanct then they see the jobye. If someone intertwine the barret and they like the carolina then they visit the jobye. If someone rubify the jobye and the jobye is aerobic then the jobye intertwine the carolina. If someone wolf the jobye then they visit the carolina. If someone is sacrosanct and they see the jobye then the jobye is uncurbed. The barret rubify the jobye.", "logic": "\nRubify(barret, jobye)\nCatarrhine(carolina)\nRubify(jobye, carolina)\nforall x (Rubify(x, carolina) -> Sacrosanct(x))\nforall x (Rubify(x, barret) and Wolf(x, jobye) -> Wolf(x, barret))\nforall x (Wolf(x, barret) -> Wolf(x, jobye))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Rubify(x, jobye))\nforall x (Intertwine(x, barret) and Intertwine(x, carolina) -> Wolf(x, jobye))\nforall x (Rubify(x, jobye) and Aerobic(jobye) -> Intertwine(jobye, carolina))\nforall x (Wolf(x, jobye) -> Wolf(x, carolina))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Rubify(x, jobye) -> Uncurbed(jobye))\n\nRubify(barret, jobye)\n\ntherefore Rubify(barret, jobye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The karin appreciate the fay. The gerri is priestly. The fay appreciate the gerri. If someone appreciate the gerri then they are slowgoing. If someone appreciate the karin and they visit the fay then they visit the karin. If someone accept the karin then they visit the fay. If someone is slowgoing then they see the fay. If someone overcook the karin and they like the gerri then they visit the fay. If someone appreciate the fay and the fay is seemly then the fay overcook the gerri. If someone accept the fay then they visit the gerri. If someone is slowgoing and they see the fay then the fay is achromous. The fay does not see the gerri.", "logic": "\nAppreciate(karin, fay)\nPriestly(gerri)\nAppreciate(fay, gerri)\nforall x (Appreciate(x, gerri) -> Slowgoing(x))\nforall x (Appreciate(x, karin) and Accept(x, fay) -> Accept(x, karin))\nforall x (Accept(x, karin) -> Accept(x, fay))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Appreciate(x, fay))\nforall x (Overcook(x, karin) and Overcook(x, gerri) -> Accept(x, fay))\nforall x (Appreciate(x, fay) and Seemly(fay) -> Overcook(fay, gerri))\nforall x (Accept(x, fay) -> Accept(x, gerri))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) and Appreciate(x, fay) -> Achromous(fay))\n\nnot Appreciate(fay, gerri)\n\ntherefore Appreciate(fay, gerri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The kaja stabilize the ehud. The nicolette is vocative. The ehud stabilize the nicolette. If someone stabilize the nicolette then they are interwoven. If someone stabilize the kaja and they visit the ehud then they visit the kaja. If someone apologise the kaja then they visit the ehud. If someone is interwoven then they see the ehud. If someone handle the kaja and they like the nicolette then they visit the ehud. If someone stabilize the ehud and the ehud is xxii then the ehud handle the nicolette. If someone apologise the ehud then they visit the nicolette. If someone is interwoven and they see the ehud then the ehud is endozoan. The ehud is interwoven.", "logic": "\nStabilize(kaja, ehud)\nVocative(nicolette)\nStabilize(ehud, nicolette)\nforall x (Stabilize(x, nicolette) -> Interwoven(x))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, kaja) and Apologise(x, ehud) -> Apologise(x, kaja))\nforall x (Apologise(x, kaja) -> Apologise(x, ehud))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) -> Stabilize(x, ehud))\nforall x (Handle(x, kaja) and Handle(x, nicolette) -> Apologise(x, ehud))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, ehud) and Xxii(ehud) -> Handle(ehud, nicolette))\nforall x (Apologise(x, ehud) -> Apologise(x, nicolette))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Stabilize(x, ehud) -> Endozoan(ehud))\n\nInterwoven(ehud)\n\nStabilize(ehud, nicolette) and forall x (Stabilize(x, nicolette) -> Interwoven(x)) -> therefore Interwoven(ehud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The kizzie ground the celestina. The mercedes is lamarckian. The celestina ground the mercedes. If someone ground the mercedes then they are agonising. If someone ground the kizzie and they visit the celestina then they visit the kizzie. If someone reverence the kizzie then they visit the celestina. If someone is agonising then they see the celestina. If someone digitalize the kizzie and they like the mercedes then they visit the celestina. If someone ground the celestina and the celestina is french then the celestina digitalize the mercedes. If someone reverence the celestina then they visit the mercedes. If someone is agonising and they see the celestina then the celestina is audacious. The celestina is not agonising.", "logic": "\nGround(kizzie, celestina)\nLamarckian(mercedes)\nGround(celestina, mercedes)\nforall x (Ground(x, mercedes) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Ground(x, kizzie) and Reverence(x, celestina) -> Reverence(x, kizzie))\nforall x (Reverence(x, kizzie) -> Reverence(x, celestina))\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Ground(x, celestina))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, kizzie) and Digitalize(x, mercedes) -> Reverence(x, celestina))\nforall x (Ground(x, celestina) and French(celestina) -> Digitalize(celestina, mercedes))\nforall x (Reverence(x, celestina) -> Reverence(x, mercedes))\nforall x (Agonising(x) and Ground(x, celestina) -> Audacious(celestina))\n\nnot Agonising(celestina)\n\nGround(celestina, mercedes) and forall x (Ground(x, mercedes) -> Agonising(x)) -> therefore Agonising(celestina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The yolande gravitate the gonzalo. The boyd is spartan. The gonzalo gravitate the boyd. If someone gravitate the boyd then they are palpatory. If someone gravitate the yolande and they visit the gonzalo then they visit the yolande. If someone coapt the yolande then they visit the gonzalo. If someone is palpatory then they see the gonzalo. If someone hook the yolande and they like the boyd then they visit the gonzalo. If someone gravitate the gonzalo and the gonzalo is egoistical then the gonzalo hook the boyd. If someone coapt the gonzalo then they visit the boyd. If someone is palpatory and they see the gonzalo then the gonzalo is idyllic. The gonzalo gravitate the gonzalo.", "logic": "\nGravitate(yolande, gonzalo)\nSpartan(boyd)\nGravitate(gonzalo, boyd)\nforall x (Gravitate(x, boyd) -> Palpatory(x))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, yolande) and Coapt(x, gonzalo) -> Coapt(x, yolande))\nforall x (Coapt(x, yolande) -> Coapt(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) -> Gravitate(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Hook(x, yolande) and Hook(x, boyd) -> Coapt(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, gonzalo) and Egoistical(gonzalo) -> Hook(gonzalo, boyd))\nforall x (Coapt(x, gonzalo) -> Coapt(x, boyd))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Gravitate(x, gonzalo) -> Idyllic(gonzalo))\n\nGravitate(gonzalo, gonzalo)\n\nGravitate(gonzalo, boyd) and forall x (Gravitate(x, boyd) -> Palpatory(x)) -> therefore Palpatory(gonzalo) Palpatory(gonzalo) and forall x (Palpatory(x) -> Gravitate(x, gonzalo)) -> therefore Gravitate(gonzalo, gonzalo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The zena nuke the catha. The cindelyn is fortissimo. The catha nuke the cindelyn. If someone nuke the cindelyn then they are lovely. If someone nuke the zena and they visit the catha then they visit the zena. If someone befit the zena then they visit the catha. If someone is lovely then they see the catha. If someone hull the zena and they like the cindelyn then they visit the catha. If someone nuke the catha and the catha is maxillary then the catha hull the cindelyn. If someone befit the catha then they visit the cindelyn. If someone is lovely and they see the catha then the catha is winking. The catha does not see the catha.", "logic": "\nNuke(zena, catha)\nFortissimo(cindelyn)\nNuke(catha, cindelyn)\nforall x (Nuke(x, cindelyn) -> Lovely(x))\nforall x (Nuke(x, zena) and Befit(x, catha) -> Befit(x, zena))\nforall x (Befit(x, zena) -> Befit(x, catha))\nforall x (Lovely(x) -> Nuke(x, catha))\nforall x (Hull(x, zena) and Hull(x, cindelyn) -> Befit(x, catha))\nforall x (Nuke(x, catha) and Maxillary(catha) -> Hull(catha, cindelyn))\nforall x (Befit(x, catha) -> Befit(x, cindelyn))\nforall x (Lovely(x) and Nuke(x, catha) -> Winking(catha))\n\nnot Nuke(catha, catha)\n\nNuke(catha, cindelyn) and forall x (Nuke(x, cindelyn) -> Lovely(x)) -> therefore Lovely(catha) Lovely(catha) and forall x (Lovely(x) -> Nuke(x, catha)) -> therefore Nuke(catha, catha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The gui cede the nina. The sheena is burred. The nina cede the sheena. If someone cede the sheena then they are insensible. If someone cede the gui and they visit the nina then they visit the gui. If someone wattle the gui then they visit the nina. If someone is insensible then they see the nina. If someone disdain the gui and they like the sheena then they visit the nina. If someone cede the nina and the nina is wooly then the nina disdain the sheena. If someone wattle the nina then they visit the sheena. If someone is insensible and they see the nina then the nina is sectorial. The nina is sectorial.", "logic": "\nCede(gui, nina)\nBurred(sheena)\nCede(nina, sheena)\nforall x (Cede(x, sheena) -> Insensible(x))\nforall x (Cede(x, gui) and Wattle(x, nina) -> Wattle(x, gui))\nforall x (Wattle(x, gui) -> Wattle(x, nina))\nforall x (Insensible(x) -> Cede(x, nina))\nforall x (Disdain(x, gui) and Disdain(x, sheena) -> Wattle(x, nina))\nforall x (Cede(x, nina) and Wooly(nina) -> Disdain(nina, sheena))\nforall x (Wattle(x, nina) -> Wattle(x, sheena))\nforall x (Insensible(x) and Cede(x, nina) -> Sectorial(nina))\n\nSectorial(nina)\n\nCede(nina, sheena) and forall x (Cede(x, sheena) -> Insensible(x)) -> therefore Insensible(nina) Cede(nina, sheena) and forall x (Cede(x, sheena) -> Insensible(x)) -> therefore Insensible(nina) Insensible(nina) and forall x (Insensible(x) -> Cede(x, nina)) -> therefore Cede(nina, nina) Insensible(nina) and Cede(nina, nina) and forall x (Insensible(x) and Cede(x, nina) -> Sectorial(nina)) -> therefore Sectorial(nina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The kelsey surge the sloan. The sondra is splay. The sloan surge the sondra. If someone surge the sondra then they are angulate. If someone surge the kelsey and they visit the sloan then they visit the kelsey. If someone garrison the kelsey then they visit the sloan. If someone is angulate then they see the sloan. If someone tourney the kelsey and they like the sondra then they visit the sloan. If someone surge the sloan and the sloan is imperative then the sloan tourney the sondra. If someone garrison the sloan then they visit the sondra. If someone is angulate and they see the sloan then the sloan is articulate. The sloan is not articulate.", "logic": "\nSurge(kelsey, sloan)\nSplay(sondra)\nSurge(sloan, sondra)\nforall x (Surge(x, sondra) -> Angulate(x))\nforall x (Surge(x, kelsey) and Garrison(x, sloan) -> Garrison(x, kelsey))\nforall x (Garrison(x, kelsey) -> Garrison(x, sloan))\nforall x (Angulate(x) -> Surge(x, sloan))\nforall x (Tourney(x, kelsey) and Tourney(x, sondra) -> Garrison(x, sloan))\nforall x (Surge(x, sloan) and Imperative(sloan) -> Tourney(sloan, sondra))\nforall x (Garrison(x, sloan) -> Garrison(x, sondra))\nforall x (Angulate(x) and Surge(x, sloan) -> Articulate(sloan))\n\nnot Articulate(sloan)\n\nSurge(sloan, sondra) and forall x (Surge(x, sondra) -> Angulate(x)) -> therefore Angulate(sloan) Surge(sloan, sondra) and forall x (Surge(x, sondra) -> Angulate(x)) -> therefore Angulate(sloan) Angulate(sloan) and forall x (Angulate(x) -> Surge(x, sloan)) -> therefore Surge(sloan, sloan) Angulate(sloan) and Surge(sloan, sloan) and forall x (Angulate(x) and Surge(x, sloan) -> Articulate(sloan)) -> therefore Articulate(sloan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The valeda appraise the xavier. The keslie is scenic. The xavier appraise the keslie. If someone appraise the keslie then they are propitious. If someone appraise the valeda and they visit the xavier then they visit the valeda. If someone scrimmage the valeda then they visit the xavier. If someone is propitious then they see the xavier. If someone appall the valeda and they like the keslie then they visit the xavier. If someone appraise the xavier and the xavier is parasitic then the xavier appall the keslie. If someone scrimmage the xavier then they visit the keslie. If someone is propitious and they see the xavier then the xavier is exsanguine. The keslie does not visit the keslie.", "logic": "\nAppraise(valeda, xavier)\nScenic(keslie)\nAppraise(xavier, keslie)\nforall x (Appraise(x, keslie) -> Propitious(x))\nforall x (Appraise(x, valeda) and Scrimmage(x, xavier) -> Scrimmage(x, valeda))\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, valeda) -> Scrimmage(x, xavier))\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Appraise(x, xavier))\nforall x (Appall(x, valeda) and Appall(x, keslie) -> Scrimmage(x, xavier))\nforall x (Appraise(x, xavier) and Parasitic(xavier) -> Appall(xavier, keslie))\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, xavier) -> Scrimmage(x, keslie))\nforall x (Propitious(x) and Appraise(x, xavier) -> Exsanguine(xavier))\n\nnot Scrimmage(keslie, keslie)\n\nforall x (Scrimmage(x, xavier) -> Scrimmage(x, keslie)) <- forall x (Scrimmage(x, valeda) -> Scrimmage(x, xavier)) <- forall x (Appraise(x, valeda) and Scrimmage(x, xavier) -> Scrimmage(x, valeda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The hollis abrase the sibby. The zach is tested. The sibby abrase the zach. If someone abrase the zach then they are asymptotic. If someone abrase the hollis and they visit the sibby then they visit the hollis. If someone golf the hollis then they visit the sibby. If someone is asymptotic then they see the sibby. If someone metallize the hollis and they like the zach then they visit the sibby. If someone abrase the sibby and the sibby is south then the sibby metallize the zach. If someone golf the sibby then they visit the zach. If someone is asymptotic and they see the sibby then the sibby is littoral. The zach golf the sibby.", "logic": "\nAbrase(hollis, sibby)\nTested(zach)\nAbrase(sibby, zach)\nforall x (Abrase(x, zach) -> Asymptotic(x))\nforall x (Abrase(x, hollis) and Golf(x, sibby) -> Golf(x, hollis))\nforall x (Golf(x, hollis) -> Golf(x, sibby))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) -> Abrase(x, sibby))\nforall x (Metallize(x, hollis) and Metallize(x, zach) -> Golf(x, sibby))\nforall x (Abrase(x, sibby) and South(sibby) -> Metallize(sibby, zach))\nforall x (Golf(x, sibby) -> Golf(x, zach))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) and Abrase(x, sibby) -> Littoral(sibby))\n\nGolf(zach, sibby)\n\nforall x (Golf(x, hollis) -> Golf(x, sibby)) <- forall x (Abrase(x, hollis) and Golf(x, sibby) -> Golf(x, hollis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The noel bemock the farica. The randene is intended. The farica bemock the randene. If someone bemock the randene then they are undefeated. If someone bemock the noel and they visit the farica then they visit the noel. If someone persuade the noel then they visit the farica. If someone is undefeated then they see the farica. If someone divulge the noel and they like the randene then they visit the farica. If someone bemock the farica and the farica is hellish then the farica divulge the randene. If someone persuade the farica then they visit the randene. If someone is undefeated and they see the farica then the farica is tempered. The randene does not visit the noel.", "logic": "\nBemock(noel, farica)\nIntended(randene)\nBemock(farica, randene)\nforall x (Bemock(x, randene) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Bemock(x, noel) and Persuade(x, farica) -> Persuade(x, noel))\nforall x (Persuade(x, noel) -> Persuade(x, farica))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) -> Bemock(x, farica))\nforall x (Divulge(x, noel) and Divulge(x, randene) -> Persuade(x, farica))\nforall x (Bemock(x, farica) and Hellish(farica) -> Divulge(farica, randene))\nforall x (Persuade(x, farica) -> Persuade(x, randene))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and Bemock(x, farica) -> Tempered(farica))\n\nnot Persuade(randene, noel)\n\nforall x (Bemock(x, noel) and Persuade(x, farica) -> Persuade(x, noel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The halley exenterate the jess. The billie is maplelike. The jess exenterate the billie. If someone exenterate the billie then they are segmented. If someone exenterate the halley and they visit the jess then they visit the halley. If someone swatter the halley then they visit the jess. If someone is segmented then they see the jess. If someone formicate the halley and they like the billie then they visit the jess. If someone exenterate the jess and the jess is associate then the jess formicate the billie. If someone swatter the jess then they visit the billie. If someone is segmented and they see the jess then the jess is humane. The billie exenterate the jess.", "logic": "\nExenterate(halley, jess)\nMaplelike(billie)\nExenterate(jess, billie)\nforall x (Exenterate(x, billie) -> Segmented(x))\nforall x (Exenterate(x, halley) and Swatter(x, jess) -> Swatter(x, halley))\nforall x (Swatter(x, halley) -> Swatter(x, jess))\nforall x (Segmented(x) -> Exenterate(x, jess))\nforall x (Formicate(x, halley) and Formicate(x, billie) -> Swatter(x, jess))\nforall x (Exenterate(x, jess) and Associate(jess) -> Formicate(jess, billie))\nforall x (Swatter(x, jess) -> Swatter(x, billie))\nforall x (Segmented(x) and Exenterate(x, jess) -> Humane(jess))\n\nExenterate(billie, jess)\n\nforall x (Segmented(x) -> Exenterate(x, jess)) <- forall x (Exenterate(x, billie) -> Segmented(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The hewie flavour the cain. The alford is weekly. The cain flavour the alford. If someone flavour the alford then they are lukewarm. If someone flavour the hewie and they visit the cain then they visit the hewie. If someone evince the hewie then they visit the cain. If someone is lukewarm then they see the cain. If someone unstrain the hewie and they like the alford then they visit the cain. If someone flavour the cain and the cain is spare then the cain unstrain the alford. If someone evince the cain then they visit the alford. If someone is lukewarm and they see the cain then the cain is angled. The cain does not like the hewie.", "logic": "\nFlavour(hewie, cain)\nWeekly(alford)\nFlavour(cain, alford)\nforall x (Flavour(x, alford) -> Lukewarm(x))\nforall x (Flavour(x, hewie) and Evince(x, cain) -> Evince(x, hewie))\nforall x (Evince(x, hewie) -> Evince(x, cain))\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) -> Flavour(x, cain))\nforall x (Unstrain(x, hewie) and Unstrain(x, alford) -> Evince(x, cain))\nforall x (Flavour(x, cain) and Spare(cain) -> Unstrain(cain, alford))\nforall x (Evince(x, cain) -> Evince(x, alford))\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) and Flavour(x, cain) -> Angled(cain))\n\nnot Unstrain(cain, hewie)\n\nnot Unstrain(cain, hewie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The sherwynd underbid the hedy. The jackelyn is synoptic. The hedy underbid the jackelyn. If someone underbid the jackelyn then they are detectable. If someone underbid the sherwynd and they visit the hedy then they visit the sherwynd. If someone snitch the sherwynd then they visit the hedy. If someone is detectable then they see the hedy. If someone deify the sherwynd and they like the jackelyn then they visit the hedy. If someone underbid the hedy and the hedy is correlated then the hedy deify the jackelyn. If someone snitch the hedy then they visit the jackelyn. If someone is detectable and they see the hedy then the hedy is cherry. The sherwynd underbid the jackelyn.", "logic": "\nUnderbid(sherwynd, hedy)\nSynoptic(jackelyn)\nUnderbid(hedy, jackelyn)\nforall x (Underbid(x, jackelyn) -> Detectable(x))\nforall x (Underbid(x, sherwynd) and Snitch(x, hedy) -> Snitch(x, sherwynd))\nforall x (Snitch(x, sherwynd) -> Snitch(x, hedy))\nforall x (Detectable(x) -> Underbid(x, hedy))\nforall x (Deify(x, sherwynd) and Deify(x, jackelyn) -> Snitch(x, hedy))\nforall x (Underbid(x, hedy) and Correlated(hedy) -> Deify(hedy, jackelyn))\nforall x (Snitch(x, hedy) -> Snitch(x, jackelyn))\nforall x (Detectable(x) and Underbid(x, hedy) -> Cherry(hedy))\n\nUnderbid(sherwynd, jackelyn)\n\nUnderbid(sherwynd, jackelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The babette honor the fawne. The nanci is pastel. The fawne honor the nanci. If someone honor the nanci then they are schematic. If someone honor the babette and they visit the fawne then they visit the babette. If someone circle the babette then they visit the fawne. If someone is schematic then they see the fawne. If someone maximize the babette and they like the nanci then they visit the fawne. If someone honor the fawne and the fawne is caucasic then the fawne maximize the nanci. If someone circle the fawne then they visit the nanci. If someone is schematic and they see the fawne then the fawne is limacine. The nanci does not like the fawne.", "logic": "\nHonor(babette, fawne)\nPastel(nanci)\nHonor(fawne, nanci)\nforall x (Honor(x, nanci) -> Schematic(x))\nforall x (Honor(x, babette) and Circle(x, fawne) -> Circle(x, babette))\nforall x (Circle(x, babette) -> Circle(x, fawne))\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Honor(x, fawne))\nforall x (Maximize(x, babette) and Maximize(x, nanci) -> Circle(x, fawne))\nforall x (Honor(x, fawne) and Caucasic(fawne) -> Maximize(fawne, nanci))\nforall x (Circle(x, fawne) -> Circle(x, nanci))\nforall x (Schematic(x) and Honor(x, fawne) -> Limacine(fawne))\n\nnot Maximize(nanci, fawne)\n\nnot Maximize(nanci, fawne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "The ichabod contour the jobina. The franky is splenetic. The jobina contour the franky. If someone contour the franky then they are sunburnt. If someone contour the ichabod and they visit the jobina then they visit the ichabod. If someone rage the ichabod then they visit the jobina. If someone is sunburnt then they see the jobina. If someone relax the ichabod and they like the franky then they visit the jobina. If someone contour the jobina and the jobina is riled then the jobina relax the franky. If someone rage the jobina then they visit the franky. If someone is sunburnt and they see the jobina then the jobina is despised. The jobina is blue.", "logic": "\nContour(ichabod, jobina)\nSplenetic(franky)\nContour(jobina, franky)\nforall x (Contour(x, franky) -> Sunburnt(x))\nforall x (Contour(x, ichabod) and Rage(x, jobina) -> Rage(x, ichabod))\nforall x (Rage(x, ichabod) -> Rage(x, jobina))\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Contour(x, jobina))\nforall x (Relax(x, ichabod) and Relax(x, franky) -> Rage(x, jobina))\nforall x (Contour(x, jobina) and Riled(jobina) -> Relax(jobina, franky))\nforall x (Rage(x, jobina) -> Rage(x, franky))\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) and Contour(x, jobina) -> Despised(jobina))\n\nBlue(jobina)\n\nBlue(jobina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1057"} {"premises": "Margo is subocular. Manda is overawed. Manda is burry. Manda is seeable. Gerda is subocular. Gerda is burry. Gerda is seeable. Rae is overawed. Rae is burry. Rae is homostyled. Young people are oily. If Margo is overawed then Margo is seeable. Quiet people are homostyled. If Margo is burry then Margo is seeable. If someone is subocular then they are burry. Cold, homostyled people are rested. Margo is subocular.", "logic": "\nSubocular(margo)\nOverawed(manda)\nBurry(manda)\nSeeable(manda)\nSubocular(gerda)\nBurry(gerda)\nSeeable(gerda)\nOverawed(rae)\nBurry(rae)\nHomostyled(rae)\nforall x (Homostyled(x) -> Oily(x))\nOverawed(margo) -> Seeable(margo)\nforall x (Burry(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nBurry(margo) -> Seeable(margo)\nforall x (Subocular(x) -> Burry(x))\nforall x (Overawed(x) and Homostyled(x) -> Rested(x))\n\nSubocular(margo)\n\ntherefore Subocular(margo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Megen is imputable. Milka is agelong. Milka is decisive. Milka is stacked. Nora is imputable. Nora is decisive. Nora is stacked. Mirabelle is agelong. Mirabelle is decisive. Mirabelle is tropical. Young people are blockading. If Megen is agelong then Megen is stacked. Quiet people are tropical. If Megen is decisive then Megen is stacked. If someone is imputable then they are decisive. Cold, tropical people are dulled. Mirabelle is not tropical.", "logic": "\nImputable(megen)\nAgelong(milka)\nDecisive(milka)\nStacked(milka)\nImputable(nora)\nDecisive(nora)\nStacked(nora)\nAgelong(mirabelle)\nDecisive(mirabelle)\nTropical(mirabelle)\nforall x (Tropical(x) -> Blockading(x))\nAgelong(megen) -> Stacked(megen)\nforall x (Decisive(x) -> Tropical(x))\nDecisive(megen) -> Stacked(megen)\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Agelong(x) and Tropical(x) -> Dulled(x))\n\nnot Tropical(mirabelle)\n\ntherefore Tropical(mirabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Moses is nearby. Barry is desolate. Barry is permeating. Barry is oscine. Wilma is nearby. Wilma is permeating. Wilma is oscine. Lorelle is desolate. Lorelle is permeating. Lorelle is subsurface. Young people are hushed. If Moses is desolate then Moses is oscine. Quiet people are subsurface. If Moses is permeating then Moses is oscine. If someone is nearby then they are permeating. Cold, subsurface people are slumbery. Moses is permeating.", "logic": "\nNearby(moses)\nDesolate(barry)\nPermeating(barry)\nOscine(barry)\nNearby(wilma)\nPermeating(wilma)\nOscine(wilma)\nDesolate(lorelle)\nPermeating(lorelle)\nSubsurface(lorelle)\nforall x (Subsurface(x) -> Hushed(x))\nDesolate(moses) -> Oscine(moses)\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Subsurface(x))\nPermeating(moses) -> Oscine(moses)\nforall x (Nearby(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Desolate(x) and Subsurface(x) -> Slumbery(x))\n\nPermeating(moses)\n\nNearby(moses) and forall x (Nearby(x) -> Permeating(x)) -> therefore Permeating(moses)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Zabrina is piano. Virgilio is angered. Virgilio is allegoric. Virgilio is unfertile. Gussy is piano. Gussy is allegoric. Gussy is unfertile. Tandy is angered. Tandy is allegoric. Tandy is alveolate. Young people are uninviting. If Zabrina is angered then Zabrina is unfertile. Quiet people are alveolate. If Zabrina is allegoric then Zabrina is unfertile. If someone is piano then they are allegoric. Cold, alveolate people are inevitable. Tandy is not inevitable.", "logic": "\nPiano(zabrina)\nAngered(virgilio)\nAllegoric(virgilio)\nUnfertile(virgilio)\nPiano(gussy)\nAllegoric(gussy)\nUnfertile(gussy)\nAngered(tandy)\nAllegoric(tandy)\nAlveolate(tandy)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) -> Uninviting(x))\nAngered(zabrina) -> Unfertile(zabrina)\nforall x (Allegoric(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nAllegoric(zabrina) -> Unfertile(zabrina)\nforall x (Piano(x) -> Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Angered(x) and Alveolate(x) -> Inevitable(x))\n\nnot Inevitable(tandy)\n\nAngered(tandy) and Alveolate(tandy) and forall x (Angered(x) and Alveolate(x) -> Inevitable(x)) -> therefore Inevitable(tandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Alene is peckish. Neddie is gruelling. Neddie is gettable. Neddie is slouchy. Carolee is peckish. Carolee is gettable. Carolee is slouchy. Joelle is gruelling. Joelle is gettable. Joelle is sleeveless. Young people are bearing. If Alene is gruelling then Alene is slouchy. Quiet people are sleeveless. If Alene is gettable then Alene is slouchy. If someone is peckish then they are gettable. Cold, sleeveless people are hick. Neddie is bearing.", "logic": "\nPeckish(alene)\nGruelling(neddie)\nGettable(neddie)\nSlouchy(neddie)\nPeckish(carolee)\nGettable(carolee)\nSlouchy(carolee)\nGruelling(joelle)\nGettable(joelle)\nSleeveless(joelle)\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Bearing(x))\nGruelling(alene) -> Slouchy(alene)\nforall x (Gettable(x) -> Sleeveless(x))\nGettable(alene) -> Slouchy(alene)\nforall x (Peckish(x) -> Gettable(x))\nforall x (Gruelling(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Hick(x))\n\nBearing(neddie)\n\nGettable(neddie) and forall x (Gettable(x) -> Sleeveless(x)) -> therefore Sleeveless(neddie) Sleeveless(neddie) and forall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Bearing(x)) -> therefore Bearing(neddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Niki is swell. Shayne is wearing. Shayne is portuguese. Shayne is cultivable. Melantha is swell. Melantha is portuguese. Melantha is cultivable. Arlee is wearing. Arlee is portuguese. Arlee is sheeny. Young people are snakelike. If Niki is wearing then Niki is cultivable. Quiet people are sheeny. If Niki is portuguese then Niki is cultivable. If someone is swell then they are portuguese. Cold, sheeny people are serflike. Niki is not sheeny.", "logic": "\nSwell(niki)\nWearing(shayne)\nPortuguese(shayne)\nCultivable(shayne)\nSwell(melantha)\nPortuguese(melantha)\nCultivable(melantha)\nWearing(arlee)\nPortuguese(arlee)\nSheeny(arlee)\nforall x (Sheeny(x) -> Snakelike(x))\nWearing(niki) -> Cultivable(niki)\nforall x (Portuguese(x) -> Sheeny(x))\nPortuguese(niki) -> Cultivable(niki)\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Portuguese(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) and Sheeny(x) -> Serflike(x))\n\nnot Sheeny(niki)\n\nSwell(niki) and forall x (Swell(x) -> Portuguese(x)) -> therefore Portuguese(niki) Portuguese(niki) and forall x (Portuguese(x) -> Sheeny(x)) -> therefore Sheeny(niki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Randa is tameable. Vin is better. Vin is tutelary. Vin is tearful. Teena is tameable. Teena is tutelary. Teena is tearful. Kass is better. Kass is tutelary. Kass is unlovable. Young people are anuran. If Randa is better then Randa is tearful. Quiet people are unlovable. If Randa is tutelary then Randa is tearful. If someone is tameable then they are tutelary. Cold, unlovable people are huffish. Randa is anuran.", "logic": "\nTameable(randa)\nBetter(vin)\nTutelary(vin)\nTearful(vin)\nTameable(teena)\nTutelary(teena)\nTearful(teena)\nBetter(kass)\nTutelary(kass)\nUnlovable(kass)\nforall x (Unlovable(x) -> Anuran(x))\nBetter(randa) -> Tearful(randa)\nforall x (Tutelary(x) -> Unlovable(x))\nTutelary(randa) -> Tearful(randa)\nforall x (Tameable(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Better(x) and Unlovable(x) -> Huffish(x))\n\nAnuran(randa)\n\nTameable(randa) and forall x (Tameable(x) -> Tutelary(x)) -> therefore Tutelary(randa) Tutelary(randa) and forall x (Tutelary(x) -> Unlovable(x)) -> therefore Unlovable(randa) Unlovable(randa) and forall x (Unlovable(x) -> Anuran(x)) -> therefore Anuran(randa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Natalie is storeyed. Laurent is infinite. Laurent is hideous. Laurent is fingered. Delphinia is storeyed. Delphinia is hideous. Delphinia is fingered. Elane is infinite. Elane is hideous. Elane is immortal. Young people are queenly. If Natalie is infinite then Natalie is fingered. Quiet people are immortal. If Natalie is hideous then Natalie is fingered. If someone is storeyed then they are hideous. Cold, immortal people are gibelike. Natalie is not queenly.", "logic": "\nStoreyed(natalie)\nInfinite(laurent)\nHideous(laurent)\nFingered(laurent)\nStoreyed(delphinia)\nHideous(delphinia)\nFingered(delphinia)\nInfinite(elane)\nHideous(elane)\nImmortal(elane)\nforall x (Immortal(x) -> Queenly(x))\nInfinite(natalie) -> Fingered(natalie)\nforall x (Hideous(x) -> Immortal(x))\nHideous(natalie) -> Fingered(natalie)\nforall x (Storeyed(x) -> Hideous(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) and Immortal(x) -> Gibelike(x))\n\nnot Queenly(natalie)\n\nStoreyed(natalie) and forall x (Storeyed(x) -> Hideous(x)) -> therefore Hideous(natalie) Hideous(natalie) and forall x (Hideous(x) -> Immortal(x)) -> therefore Immortal(natalie) Immortal(natalie) and forall x (Immortal(x) -> Queenly(x)) -> therefore Queenly(natalie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Brent is celestial. Candi is warmed. Candi is turkic. Candi is cationic. Nester is celestial. Nester is turkic. Nester is cationic. Roman is warmed. Roman is turkic. Roman is purblind. Young people are tall. If Brent is warmed then Brent is cationic. Quiet people are purblind. If Brent is turkic then Brent is cationic. If someone is celestial then they are turkic. Cold, purblind people are hormonal. Nester is not hormonal.", "logic": "\nCelestial(brent)\nWarmed(candi)\nTurkic(candi)\nCationic(candi)\nCelestial(nester)\nTurkic(nester)\nCationic(nester)\nWarmed(roman)\nTurkic(roman)\nPurblind(roman)\nforall x (Purblind(x) -> Tall(x))\nWarmed(brent) -> Cationic(brent)\nforall x (Turkic(x) -> Purblind(x))\nTurkic(brent) -> Cationic(brent)\nforall x (Celestial(x) -> Turkic(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) and Purblind(x) -> Hormonal(x))\n\nnot Hormonal(nester)\n\nforall x (Warmed(x) and Purblind(x) -> Hormonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Corissa is irenic. Cherri is alluvial. Cherri is limbed. Cherri is piratical. Jervis is irenic. Jervis is limbed. Jervis is piratical. Mirna is alluvial. Mirna is limbed. Mirna is nonporous. Young people are fatalist. If Corissa is alluvial then Corissa is piratical. Quiet people are nonporous. If Corissa is limbed then Corissa is piratical. If someone is irenic then they are limbed. Cold, nonporous people are zymotic. Corissa is zymotic.", "logic": "\nIrenic(corissa)\nAlluvial(cherri)\nLimbed(cherri)\nPiratical(cherri)\nIrenic(jervis)\nLimbed(jervis)\nPiratical(jervis)\nAlluvial(mirna)\nLimbed(mirna)\nNonporous(mirna)\nforall x (Nonporous(x) -> Fatalist(x))\nAlluvial(corissa) -> Piratical(corissa)\nforall x (Limbed(x) -> Nonporous(x))\nLimbed(corissa) -> Piratical(corissa)\nforall x (Irenic(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) and Nonporous(x) -> Zymotic(x))\n\nZymotic(corissa)\n\nforall x (Alluvial(x) and Nonporous(x) -> Zymotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Sapphira is fascistic. Sander is elliptical. Sander is jangling. Sander is bustling. Margalit is fascistic. Margalit is jangling. Margalit is bustling. Misha is elliptical. Misha is jangling. Misha is backhanded. Young people are archival. If Sapphira is elliptical then Sapphira is bustling. Quiet people are backhanded. If Sapphira is jangling then Sapphira is bustling. If someone is fascistic then they are jangling. Cold, backhanded people are harassed. Misha is not bustling.", "logic": "\nFascistic(sapphira)\nElliptical(sander)\nJangling(sander)\nBustling(sander)\nFascistic(margalit)\nJangling(margalit)\nBustling(margalit)\nElliptical(misha)\nJangling(misha)\nBackhanded(misha)\nforall x (Backhanded(x) -> Archival(x))\nElliptical(sapphira) -> Bustling(sapphira)\nforall x (Jangling(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nJangling(sapphira) -> Bustling(sapphira)\nforall x (Fascistic(x) -> Jangling(x))\nforall x (Elliptical(x) and Backhanded(x) -> Harassed(x))\n\nnot Bustling(misha)\n\nnot Bustling(misha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Regine is glittery. Dorit is maximum. Dorit is frigorific. Dorit is lxxxiv. Issi is glittery. Issi is frigorific. Issi is lxxxiv. Stormi is maximum. Stormi is frigorific. Stormi is intended. Young people are inhibited. If Regine is maximum then Regine is lxxxiv. Quiet people are intended. If Regine is frigorific then Regine is lxxxiv. If someone is glittery then they are frigorific. Cold, intended people are buteonine. Dorit is glittery.", "logic": "\nGlittery(regine)\nMaximum(dorit)\nFrigorific(dorit)\nLxxxiv(dorit)\nGlittery(issi)\nFrigorific(issi)\nLxxxiv(issi)\nMaximum(stormi)\nFrigorific(stormi)\nIntended(stormi)\nforall x (Intended(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nMaximum(regine) -> Lxxxiv(regine)\nforall x (Frigorific(x) -> Intended(x))\nFrigorific(regine) -> Lxxxiv(regine)\nforall x (Glittery(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Maximum(x) and Intended(x) -> Buteonine(x))\n\nGlittery(dorit)\n\nGlittery(dorit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Sharla is carinate. France is mandatory. France is dense. France is scarred. Sunny is carinate. Sunny is dense. Sunny is scarred. Myra is mandatory. Myra is dense. Myra is indie. Young people are monkish. If Sharla is mandatory then Sharla is scarred. Quiet people are indie. If Sharla is dense then Sharla is scarred. If someone is carinate then they are dense. Cold, indie people are adjacent. Sunny is not mandatory.", "logic": "\nCarinate(sharla)\nMandatory(france)\nDense(france)\nScarred(france)\nCarinate(sunny)\nDense(sunny)\nScarred(sunny)\nMandatory(myra)\nDense(myra)\nIndie(myra)\nforall x (Indie(x) -> Monkish(x))\nMandatory(sharla) -> Scarred(sharla)\nforall x (Dense(x) -> Indie(x))\nDense(sharla) -> Scarred(sharla)\nforall x (Carinate(x) -> Dense(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) and Indie(x) -> Adjacent(x))\n\nnot Mandatory(sunny)\n\nnot Mandatory(sunny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Jillian is proustian. Katya is delimited. Katya is cashable. Katya is unhearable. Broddie is proustian. Broddie is cashable. Broddie is unhearable. Annadiane is delimited. Annadiane is cashable. Annadiane is innumerate. Young people are rhinal. If Jillian is delimited then Jillian is unhearable. Quiet people are innumerate. If Jillian is cashable then Jillian is unhearable. If someone is proustian then they are cashable. Cold, innumerate people are acetose. Jillian is delimited.", "logic": "\nProustian(jillian)\nDelimited(katya)\nCashable(katya)\nUnhearable(katya)\nProustian(broddie)\nCashable(broddie)\nUnhearable(broddie)\nDelimited(annadiane)\nCashable(annadiane)\nInnumerate(annadiane)\nforall x (Innumerate(x) -> Rhinal(x))\nDelimited(jillian) -> Unhearable(jillian)\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> Innumerate(x))\nCashable(jillian) -> Unhearable(jillian)\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Cashable(x))\nforall x (Delimited(x) and Innumerate(x) -> Acetose(x))\n\nDelimited(jillian)\n\nDelimited(jillian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-114"} {"premises": "Beatrisa is cedarn. Beatrisa is glassy. Beatrisa is not vaporous. Beatrisa is rummy. Beatrisa is ostensive. Trula is voguish. Trula is not rummy. Thaddius is cedarn. Thaddius is glassy. Thaddius is not ostensive. Round people are rummy. If someone is voguish and not glassy then they are latish. Thaddius is cedarn.", "logic": "\nCedarn(beatrisa)\nGlassy(beatrisa)\nnot Vaporous(beatrisa)\nRummy(beatrisa)\nOstensive(beatrisa)\nVoguish(trula)\nnot Rummy(trula)\nCedarn(thaddius)\nGlassy(thaddius)\nnot Ostensive(thaddius)\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Rummy(x))\nforall x (Voguish(x) and not Glassy(x) -> Latish(x))\n\nCedarn(thaddius)\n\ntherefore Cedarn(thaddius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5214"} {"premises": "Tonnie is glabellar. Tonnie is woebegone. Tonnie is not cadenced. Tonnie is assisted. Tonnie is educated. Christina is braky. Christina is not assisted. Monika is glabellar. Monika is woebegone. Monika is not educated. Round people are assisted. If someone is braky and not woebegone then they are looted. Christina is assisted.", "logic": "\nGlabellar(tonnie)\nWoebegone(tonnie)\nnot Cadenced(tonnie)\nAssisted(tonnie)\nEducated(tonnie)\nBraky(christina)\nnot Assisted(christina)\nGlabellar(monika)\nWoebegone(monika)\nnot Educated(monika)\nforall x (Cadenced(x) -> Assisted(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and not Woebegone(x) -> Looted(x))\n\nAssisted(christina)\n\ntherefore not Assisted(christina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5214"} {"premises": "Leonelle is burnt. Leonelle is repulsive. Leonelle is not scatty. Leonelle is jingly. Leonelle is uproarious. Carson is squabby. Carson is not jingly. Emanuela is burnt. Emanuela is repulsive. Emanuela is not uproarious. Round people are jingly. If someone is squabby and not repulsive then they are sobering. Leonelle is not sobering.", "logic": "\nBurnt(leonelle)\nRepulsive(leonelle)\nnot Scatty(leonelle)\nJingly(leonelle)\nUproarious(leonelle)\nSquabby(carson)\nnot Jingly(carson)\nBurnt(emanuela)\nRepulsive(emanuela)\nnot Uproarious(emanuela)\nforall x (Scatty(x) -> Jingly(x))\nforall x (Squabby(x) and not Repulsive(x) -> Sobering(x))\n\nnot Sobering(leonelle)\n\nforall x (Squabby(x) and not Repulsive(x) -> Sobering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5214"} {"premises": "Mommy is witless. Mommy is unshoed. Mommy is not decrepit. Mommy is epenthetic. Mommy is zairean. Catarina is veined. Catarina is not epenthetic. Sindee is witless. Sindee is unshoed. Sindee is not zairean. Round people are epenthetic. If someone is veined and not unshoed then they are exchanged. Catarina is unshoed.", "logic": "\nWitless(mommy)\nUnshoed(mommy)\nnot Decrepit(mommy)\nEpenthetic(mommy)\nZairean(mommy)\nVeined(catarina)\nnot Epenthetic(catarina)\nWitless(sindee)\nUnshoed(sindee)\nnot Zairean(sindee)\nforall x (Decrepit(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Veined(x) and not Unshoed(x) -> Exchanged(x))\n\nUnshoed(catarina)\n\nUnshoed(catarina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5214"} {"premises": "Garold is waste. Wolfram is lapsed. Red people are horrifying. All baboonish, waste people are lapsed. If Wolfram is underfed then Wolfram is ametropic. Rough people are underfed. Green, horrifying people are lapsed. Furry, underfed people are hittite. Wolfram is lapsed.", "logic": "\nWaste(garold)\nLapsed(wolfram)\nforall x (Lapsed(x) -> Horrifying(x))\nforall x (Baboonish(x) and Waste(x) -> Lapsed(x))\nUnderfed(wolfram) -> Ametropic(wolfram)\nforall x (Horrifying(x) -> Underfed(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) and Horrifying(x) -> Lapsed(x))\nforall x (Baboonish(x) and Underfed(x) -> Hittite(x))\n\nLapsed(wolfram)\n\ntherefore Lapsed(wolfram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Victor is unmilitary. Hubert is grasslike. Red people are provident. All precast, unmilitary people are grasslike. If Hubert is versed then Hubert is appealable. Rough people are versed. Green, provident people are grasslike. Furry, versed people are resolved. Victor is not unmilitary.", "logic": "\nUnmilitary(victor)\nGrasslike(hubert)\nforall x (Grasslike(x) -> Provident(x))\nforall x (Precast(x) and Unmilitary(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nVersed(hubert) -> Appealable(hubert)\nforall x (Provident(x) -> Versed(x))\nforall x (Versed(x) and Provident(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Precast(x) and Versed(x) -> Resolved(x))\n\nnot Unmilitary(victor)\n\ntherefore Unmilitary(victor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Anabel is quickset. Malka is unwieldy. Red people are thirteen. All cheerless, quickset people are unwieldy. If Malka is rose then Malka is bedrid. Rough people are rose. Green, thirteen people are unwieldy. Furry, rose people are nervy. Malka is thirteen.", "logic": "\nQuickset(anabel)\nUnwieldy(malka)\nforall x (Unwieldy(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Cheerless(x) and Quickset(x) -> Unwieldy(x))\nRose(malka) -> Bedrid(malka)\nforall x (Thirteen(x) -> Rose(x))\nforall x (Rose(x) and Thirteen(x) -> Unwieldy(x))\nforall x (Cheerless(x) and Rose(x) -> Nervy(x))\n\nThirteen(malka)\n\nUnwieldy(malka) and forall x (Unwieldy(x) -> Thirteen(x)) -> therefore Thirteen(malka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Kellsie is ideologic. Bennie is nullified. Red people are finespun. All unsheathed, ideologic people are nullified. If Bennie is trite then Bennie is covalent. Rough people are trite. Green, finespun people are nullified. Furry, trite people are erstwhile. Bennie is not finespun.", "logic": "\nIdeologic(kellsie)\nNullified(bennie)\nforall x (Nullified(x) -> Finespun(x))\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) and Ideologic(x) -> Nullified(x))\nTrite(bennie) -> Covalent(bennie)\nforall x (Finespun(x) -> Trite(x))\nforall x (Trite(x) and Finespun(x) -> Nullified(x))\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) and Trite(x) -> Erstwhile(x))\n\nnot Finespun(bennie)\n\nNullified(bennie) and forall x (Nullified(x) -> Finespun(x)) -> therefore Finespun(bennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Henrik is knitted. Wye is elongated. Red people are profitless. All affinal, knitted people are elongated. If Wye is untoasted then Wye is unobliging. Rough people are untoasted. Green, profitless people are elongated. Furry, untoasted people are postpartum. Wye is untoasted.", "logic": "\nKnitted(henrik)\nElongated(wye)\nforall x (Elongated(x) -> Profitless(x))\nforall x (Affinal(x) and Knitted(x) -> Elongated(x))\nUntoasted(wye) -> Unobliging(wye)\nforall x (Profitless(x) -> Untoasted(x))\nforall x (Untoasted(x) and Profitless(x) -> Elongated(x))\nforall x (Affinal(x) and Untoasted(x) -> Postpartum(x))\n\nUntoasted(wye)\n\nElongated(wye) and forall x (Elongated(x) -> Profitless(x)) -> therefore Profitless(wye) Profitless(wye) and forall x (Profitless(x) -> Untoasted(x)) -> therefore Untoasted(wye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Mickey is erasmian. Stephanus is concerned. Red people are lumpy. All opaline, erasmian people are concerned. If Stephanus is creaseless then Stephanus is detractive. Rough people are creaseless. Green, lumpy people are concerned. Furry, creaseless people are redemptory. Stephanus is not creaseless.", "logic": "\nErasmian(mickey)\nConcerned(stephanus)\nforall x (Concerned(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Opaline(x) and Erasmian(x) -> Concerned(x))\nCreaseless(stephanus) -> Detractive(stephanus)\nforall x (Lumpy(x) -> Creaseless(x))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) and Lumpy(x) -> Concerned(x))\nforall x (Opaline(x) and Creaseless(x) -> Redemptory(x))\n\nnot Creaseless(stephanus)\n\nConcerned(stephanus) and forall x (Concerned(x) -> Lumpy(x)) -> therefore Lumpy(stephanus) Lumpy(stephanus) and forall x (Lumpy(x) -> Creaseless(x)) -> therefore Creaseless(stephanus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Nova is flush. Kandy is magyar. Red people are bottom. All faint, flush people are magyar. If Kandy is charcoal then Kandy is fogyish. Rough people are charcoal. Green, bottom people are magyar. Furry, charcoal people are undying. Kandy is fogyish.", "logic": "\nFlush(nova)\nMagyar(kandy)\nforall x (Magyar(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and Flush(x) -> Magyar(x))\nCharcoal(kandy) -> Fogyish(kandy)\nforall x (Bottom(x) -> Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Charcoal(x) and Bottom(x) -> Magyar(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and Charcoal(x) -> Undying(x))\n\nFogyish(kandy)\n\nMagyar(kandy) and forall x (Magyar(x) -> Bottom(x)) -> therefore Bottom(kandy) Bottom(kandy) and forall x (Bottom(x) -> Charcoal(x)) -> therefore Charcoal(kandy) Charcoal(kandy) and Charcoal(kandy) -> Fogyish(kandy) -> therefore Fogyish(kandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Clemmy is unanswered. Ripley is voltarean. Red people are weakly. All textured, unanswered people are voltarean. If Ripley is passable then Ripley is pushful. Rough people are passable. Green, weakly people are voltarean. Furry, passable people are breezy. Ripley is not pushful.", "logic": "\nUnanswered(clemmy)\nVoltarean(ripley)\nforall x (Voltarean(x) -> Weakly(x))\nforall x (Textured(x) and Unanswered(x) -> Voltarean(x))\nPassable(ripley) -> Pushful(ripley)\nforall x (Weakly(x) -> Passable(x))\nforall x (Passable(x) and Weakly(x) -> Voltarean(x))\nforall x (Textured(x) and Passable(x) -> Breezy(x))\n\nnot Pushful(ripley)\n\nVoltarean(ripley) and forall x (Voltarean(x) -> Weakly(x)) -> therefore Weakly(ripley) Weakly(ripley) and forall x (Weakly(x) -> Passable(x)) -> therefore Passable(ripley) Passable(ripley) and Passable(ripley) -> Pushful(ripley) -> therefore Pushful(ripley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Danila is apivorous. Ellen is tsarist. Red people are mini. All bright, apivorous people are tsarist. If Ellen is municipal then Ellen is ferny. Rough people are municipal. Green, mini people are tsarist. Furry, municipal people are mutagenic. Danila is not mini.", "logic": "\nApivorous(danila)\nTsarist(ellen)\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Mini(x))\nforall x (Bright(x) and Apivorous(x) -> Tsarist(x))\nMunicipal(ellen) -> Ferny(ellen)\nforall x (Mini(x) -> Municipal(x))\nforall x (Municipal(x) and Mini(x) -> Tsarist(x))\nforall x (Bright(x) and Municipal(x) -> Mutagenic(x))\n\nnot Mini(danila)\n\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Mini(x)) <- forall x (Bright(x) and Apivorous(x) -> Tsarist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Britney is capricious. Cyb is unsaddled. Red people are cynical. All rootless, capricious people are unsaddled. If Cyb is authentic then Cyb is subgross. Rough people are authentic. Green, cynical people are unsaddled. Furry, authentic people are unmingled. Britney is unmingled.", "logic": "\nCapricious(britney)\nUnsaddled(cyb)\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Rootless(x) and Capricious(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nAuthentic(cyb) -> Subgross(cyb)\nforall x (Cynical(x) -> Authentic(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Cynical(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Rootless(x) and Authentic(x) -> Unmingled(x))\n\nUnmingled(britney)\n\nforall x (Rootless(x) and Authentic(x) -> Unmingled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Annabal is underclass. Duke is senatorial. Red people are fuscous. All reflected, underclass people are senatorial. If Duke is sedulous then Duke is raring. Rough people are sedulous. Green, fuscous people are senatorial. Furry, sedulous people are undressed. Annabal is not senatorial.", "logic": "\nUnderclass(annabal)\nSenatorial(duke)\nforall x (Senatorial(x) -> Fuscous(x))\nforall x (Reflected(x) and Underclass(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nSedulous(duke) -> Raring(duke)\nforall x (Fuscous(x) -> Sedulous(x))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) and Fuscous(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Reflected(x) and Sedulous(x) -> Undressed(x))\n\nnot Senatorial(annabal)\n\nforall x (Sedulous(x) and Fuscous(x) -> Senatorial(x)) <- forall x (Senatorial(x) -> Fuscous(x)) <- forall x (Reflected(x) and Underclass(x) -> Senatorial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Morna is absorbed. Alison is piggy. Red people are tobagonian. All assuasive, absorbed people are piggy. If Alison is obscene then Alison is central. Rough people are obscene. Green, tobagonian people are piggy. Furry, obscene people are cheapjack. Morna is obscene.", "logic": "\nAbsorbed(morna)\nPiggy(alison)\nforall x (Piggy(x) -> Tobagonian(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and Absorbed(x) -> Piggy(x))\nObscene(alison) -> Central(alison)\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Obscene(x))\nforall x (Obscene(x) and Tobagonian(x) -> Piggy(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and Obscene(x) -> Cheapjack(x))\n\nObscene(morna)\n\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Obscene(x)) <- forall x (Piggy(x) -> Tobagonian(x)) <- forall x (Assuasive(x) and Absorbed(x) -> Piggy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Alane is upwind. Jackson is antennary. Red people are cecal. All blameful, upwind people are antennary. If Jackson is acrogenous then Jackson is adulterate. Rough people are acrogenous. Green, cecal people are antennary. Furry, acrogenous people are musing. Jackson is not blameful.", "logic": "\nUpwind(alane)\nAntennary(jackson)\nforall x (Antennary(x) -> Cecal(x))\nforall x (Blameful(x) and Upwind(x) -> Antennary(x))\nAcrogenous(jackson) -> Adulterate(jackson)\nforall x (Cecal(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) and Cecal(x) -> Antennary(x))\nforall x (Blameful(x) and Acrogenous(x) -> Musing(x))\n\nnot Blameful(jackson)\n\nnot Blameful(jackson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Selestina is adiabatic. Candace is embryonic. Red people are clashing. All ascendent, adiabatic people are embryonic. If Candace is immunised then Candace is statuary. Rough people are immunised. Green, clashing people are embryonic. Furry, immunised people are numerate. Candace is adiabatic.", "logic": "\nAdiabatic(selestina)\nEmbryonic(candace)\nforall x (Embryonic(x) -> Clashing(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) and Adiabatic(x) -> Embryonic(x))\nImmunised(candace) -> Statuary(candace)\nforall x (Clashing(x) -> Immunised(x))\nforall x (Immunised(x) and Clashing(x) -> Embryonic(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) and Immunised(x) -> Numerate(x))\n\nAdiabatic(candace)\n\nAdiabatic(candace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Odessa is terminal. Rory is doctoral. Red people are woozy. All wrothful, terminal people are doctoral. If Rory is nippy then Rory is hindu. Rough people are nippy. Green, woozy people are doctoral. Furry, nippy people are futile. Odessa is not wrothful.", "logic": "\nTerminal(odessa)\nDoctoral(rory)\nforall x (Doctoral(x) -> Woozy(x))\nforall x (Wrothful(x) and Terminal(x) -> Doctoral(x))\nNippy(rory) -> Hindu(rory)\nforall x (Woozy(x) -> Nippy(x))\nforall x (Nippy(x) and Woozy(x) -> Doctoral(x))\nforall x (Wrothful(x) and Nippy(x) -> Futile(x))\n\nnot Wrothful(odessa)\n\nnot Wrothful(odessa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "Dmitri is sympatric. Mark is stainable. Red people are crazed. All inland, sympatric people are stainable. If Mark is cumbersome then Mark is best. Rough people are cumbersome. Green, crazed people are stainable. Furry, cumbersome people are huxleian. Dmitri is best.", "logic": "\nSympatric(dmitri)\nStainable(mark)\nforall x (Stainable(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) and Sympatric(x) -> Stainable(x))\nCumbersome(mark) -> Best(mark)\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Cumbersome(x))\nforall x (Cumbersome(x) and Crazed(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Inland(x) and Cumbersome(x) -> Huxleian(x))\n\nBest(dmitri)\n\nBest(dmitri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1936"} {"premises": "The gayla is not palatable. The onlea repaint the gayla. The vaclav is immoderate. The witold express the onlea. If the onlea repaint the gayla and the onlea express the gayla then the gayla express the onlea. If the witold does not like the gayla then the witold express the vaclav. If someone is austere and they do not see the witold then they need the gayla. If someone is unspecific then they see the gayla. If the witold does not like the vaclav then the vaclav does not need the onlea. If someone repaint the gayla then they are unspecific. If the vaclav express the witold then the witold does not like the onlea. If the vaclav is not unspecific and the vaclav does not need the gayla then the gayla express the vaclav. The onlea repaint the gayla.", "logic": "\nnot Palatable(gayla)\nRepaint(onlea, gayla)\nImmoderate(vaclav)\nExpress(witold, onlea)\nRepaint(onlea, gayla) and Express(onlea, gayla) -> Express(gayla, onlea)\nnot Repaint(witold, gayla) -> Express(witold, vaclav)\nforall x (Austere(x) and not Express(x, witold) -> Strut(x, gayla))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) -> Express(x, gayla))\nnot Repaint(witold, vaclav) -> not Strut(vaclav, onlea)\nforall x (Repaint(x, gayla) -> Unspecific(x))\nExpress(vaclav, witold) -> not Repaint(witold, onlea)\nnot Unspecific(vaclav) and not Strut(vaclav, gayla) -> Express(gayla, vaclav)\n\nRepaint(onlea, gayla)\n\ntherefore Repaint(onlea, gayla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The janot is not gladdened. The lynnelle customise the janot. The reginauld is animated. The tillie refill the lynnelle. If the lynnelle customise the janot and the lynnelle refill the janot then the janot refill the lynnelle. If the tillie does not like the janot then the tillie refill the reginauld. If someone is calculable and they do not see the tillie then they need the janot. If someone is vacuolated then they see the janot. If the tillie does not like the reginauld then the reginauld does not need the lynnelle. If someone customise the janot then they are vacuolated. If the reginauld refill the tillie then the tillie does not like the lynnelle. If the reginauld is not vacuolated and the reginauld does not need the janot then the janot refill the reginauld. The reginauld is not animated.", "logic": "\nnot Gladdened(janot)\nCustomise(lynnelle, janot)\nAnimated(reginauld)\nRefill(tillie, lynnelle)\nCustomise(lynnelle, janot) and Refill(lynnelle, janot) -> Refill(janot, lynnelle)\nnot Customise(tillie, janot) -> Refill(tillie, reginauld)\nforall x (Calculable(x) and not Refill(x, tillie) -> Overgrow(x, janot))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Refill(x, janot))\nnot Customise(tillie, reginauld) -> not Overgrow(reginauld, lynnelle)\nforall x (Customise(x, janot) -> Vacuolated(x))\nRefill(reginauld, tillie) -> not Customise(tillie, lynnelle)\nnot Vacuolated(reginauld) and not Overgrow(reginauld, janot) -> Refill(janot, reginauld)\n\nnot Animated(reginauld)\n\ntherefore Animated(reginauld)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The romonda is not burlesque. The ernie hymn the romonda. The marlon is visionary. The mella berate the ernie. If the ernie hymn the romonda and the ernie berate the romonda then the romonda berate the ernie. If the mella does not like the romonda then the mella berate the marlon. If someone is principal and they do not see the mella then they need the romonda. If someone is handsome then they see the romonda. If the mella does not like the marlon then the marlon does not need the ernie. If someone hymn the romonda then they are handsome. If the marlon berate the mella then the mella does not like the ernie. If the marlon is not handsome and the marlon does not need the romonda then the romonda berate the marlon. The ernie is handsome.", "logic": "\nnot Burlesque(romonda)\nHymn(ernie, romonda)\nVisionary(marlon)\nBerate(mella, ernie)\nHymn(ernie, romonda) and Berate(ernie, romonda) -> Berate(romonda, ernie)\nnot Hymn(mella, romonda) -> Berate(mella, marlon)\nforall x (Principal(x) and not Berate(x, mella) -> Protrude(x, romonda))\nforall x (Handsome(x) -> Berate(x, romonda))\nnot Hymn(mella, marlon) -> not Protrude(marlon, ernie)\nforall x (Hymn(x, romonda) -> Handsome(x))\nBerate(marlon, mella) -> not Hymn(mella, ernie)\nnot Handsome(marlon) and not Protrude(marlon, romonda) -> Berate(romonda, marlon)\n\nHandsome(ernie)\n\nHymn(ernie, romonda) and forall x (Hymn(x, romonda) -> Handsome(x)) -> therefore Handsome(ernie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The debora is not scalene. The fianna embrittle the debora. The juergen is exempt. The val clutch the fianna. If the fianna embrittle the debora and the fianna clutch the debora then the debora clutch the fianna. If the val does not like the debora then the val clutch the juergen. If someone is quilted and they do not see the val then they need the debora. If someone is inverse then they see the debora. If the val does not like the juergen then the juergen does not need the fianna. If someone embrittle the debora then they are inverse. If the juergen clutch the val then the val does not like the fianna. If the juergen is not inverse and the juergen does not need the debora then the debora clutch the juergen. The fianna is not inverse.", "logic": "\nnot Scalene(debora)\nEmbrittle(fianna, debora)\nExempt(juergen)\nClutch(val, fianna)\nEmbrittle(fianna, debora) and Clutch(fianna, debora) -> Clutch(debora, fianna)\nnot Embrittle(val, debora) -> Clutch(val, juergen)\nforall x (Quilted(x) and not Clutch(x, val) -> Disjoint(x, debora))\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Clutch(x, debora))\nnot Embrittle(val, juergen) -> not Disjoint(juergen, fianna)\nforall x (Embrittle(x, debora) -> Inverse(x))\nClutch(juergen, val) -> not Embrittle(val, fianna)\nnot Inverse(juergen) and not Disjoint(juergen, debora) -> Clutch(debora, juergen)\n\nnot Inverse(fianna)\n\nEmbrittle(fianna, debora) and forall x (Embrittle(x, debora) -> Inverse(x)) -> therefore Inverse(fianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The slim is not unsure. The candis telescope the slim. The danette is crispy. The winny nasalise the candis. If the candis telescope the slim and the candis nasalise the slim then the slim nasalise the candis. If the winny does not like the slim then the winny nasalise the danette. If someone is sympatric and they do not see the winny then they need the slim. If someone is looseleaf then they see the slim. If the winny does not like the danette then the danette does not need the candis. If someone telescope the slim then they are looseleaf. If the danette nasalise the winny then the winny does not like the candis. If the danette is not looseleaf and the danette does not need the slim then the slim nasalise the danette. The candis nasalise the slim.", "logic": "\nnot Unsure(slim)\nTelescope(candis, slim)\nCrispy(danette)\nNasalise(winny, candis)\nTelescope(candis, slim) and Nasalise(candis, slim) -> Nasalise(slim, candis)\nnot Telescope(winny, slim) -> Nasalise(winny, danette)\nforall x (Sympatric(x) and not Nasalise(x, winny) -> Reinforce(x, slim))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Nasalise(x, slim))\nnot Telescope(winny, danette) -> not Reinforce(danette, candis)\nforall x (Telescope(x, slim) -> Looseleaf(x))\nNasalise(danette, winny) -> not Telescope(winny, candis)\nnot Looseleaf(danette) and not Reinforce(danette, slim) -> Nasalise(slim, danette)\n\nNasalise(candis, slim)\n\nTelescope(candis, slim) and forall x (Telescope(x, slim) -> Looseleaf(x)) -> therefore Looseleaf(candis) Looseleaf(candis) and forall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Nasalise(x, slim)) -> therefore Nasalise(candis, slim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The chrissie is not mitigative. The henrique overrate the chrissie. The leese is unpunctual. The nathalie aggrade the henrique. If the henrique overrate the chrissie and the henrique aggrade the chrissie then the chrissie aggrade the henrique. If the nathalie does not like the chrissie then the nathalie aggrade the leese. If someone is ambagious and they do not see the nathalie then they need the chrissie. If someone is amiss then they see the chrissie. If the nathalie does not like the leese then the leese does not need the henrique. If someone overrate the chrissie then they are amiss. If the leese aggrade the nathalie then the nathalie does not like the henrique. If the leese is not amiss and the leese does not need the chrissie then the chrissie aggrade the leese. The henrique does not see the chrissie.", "logic": "\nnot Mitigative(chrissie)\nOverrate(henrique, chrissie)\nUnpunctual(leese)\nAggrade(nathalie, henrique)\nOverrate(henrique, chrissie) and Aggrade(henrique, chrissie) -> Aggrade(chrissie, henrique)\nnot Overrate(nathalie, chrissie) -> Aggrade(nathalie, leese)\nforall x (Ambagious(x) and not Aggrade(x, nathalie) -> Outpoint(x, chrissie))\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> Aggrade(x, chrissie))\nnot Overrate(nathalie, leese) -> not Outpoint(leese, henrique)\nforall x (Overrate(x, chrissie) -> Amiss(x))\nAggrade(leese, nathalie) -> not Overrate(nathalie, henrique)\nnot Amiss(leese) and not Outpoint(leese, chrissie) -> Aggrade(chrissie, leese)\n\nnot Aggrade(henrique, chrissie)\n\nOverrate(henrique, chrissie) and forall x (Overrate(x, chrissie) -> Amiss(x)) -> therefore Amiss(henrique) Amiss(henrique) and forall x (Amiss(x) -> Aggrade(x, chrissie)) -> therefore Aggrade(henrique, chrissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The tonie is not tortuous. The ethelda fraternize the tonie. The dido is suggestive. The griswold betide the ethelda. If the ethelda fraternize the tonie and the ethelda betide the tonie then the tonie betide the ethelda. If the griswold does not like the tonie then the griswold betide the dido. If someone is aleuronic and they do not see the griswold then they need the tonie. If someone is subaquatic then they see the tonie. If the griswold does not like the dido then the dido does not need the ethelda. If someone fraternize the tonie then they are subaquatic. If the dido betide the griswold then the griswold does not like the ethelda. If the dido is not subaquatic and the dido does not need the tonie then the tonie betide the dido. The tonie betide the ethelda.", "logic": "\nnot Tortuous(tonie)\nFraternize(ethelda, tonie)\nSuggestive(dido)\nBetide(griswold, ethelda)\nFraternize(ethelda, tonie) and Betide(ethelda, tonie) -> Betide(tonie, ethelda)\nnot Fraternize(griswold, tonie) -> Betide(griswold, dido)\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and not Betide(x, griswold) -> Assess(x, tonie))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Betide(x, tonie))\nnot Fraternize(griswold, dido) -> not Assess(dido, ethelda)\nforall x (Fraternize(x, tonie) -> Subaquatic(x))\nBetide(dido, griswold) -> not Fraternize(griswold, ethelda)\nnot Subaquatic(dido) and not Assess(dido, tonie) -> Betide(tonie, dido)\n\nBetide(tonie, ethelda)\n\nFraternize(ethelda, tonie) and forall x (Fraternize(x, tonie) -> Subaquatic(x)) -> therefore Subaquatic(ethelda) Subaquatic(ethelda) and forall x (Subaquatic(x) -> Betide(x, tonie)) -> therefore Betide(ethelda, tonie) Fraternize(ethelda, tonie) and Betide(ethelda, tonie) and Fraternize(ethelda, tonie) and Betide(ethelda, tonie) -> Betide(tonie, ethelda) -> therefore Betide(tonie, ethelda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The jenda is not nonresiny. The becki bombinate the jenda. The karol is garish. The clark japan the becki. If the becki bombinate the jenda and the becki japan the jenda then the jenda japan the becki. If the clark does not like the jenda then the clark japan the karol. If someone is financial and they do not see the clark then they need the jenda. If someone is foliaged then they see the jenda. If the clark does not like the karol then the karol does not need the becki. If someone bombinate the jenda then they are foliaged. If the karol japan the clark then the clark does not like the becki. If the karol is not foliaged and the karol does not need the jenda then the jenda japan the karol. The jenda does not see the becki.", "logic": "\nnot Nonresiny(jenda)\nBombinate(becki, jenda)\nGarish(karol)\nJapan(clark, becki)\nBombinate(becki, jenda) and Japan(becki, jenda) -> Japan(jenda, becki)\nnot Bombinate(clark, jenda) -> Japan(clark, karol)\nforall x (Financial(x) and not Japan(x, clark) -> Blare(x, jenda))\nforall x (Foliaged(x) -> Japan(x, jenda))\nnot Bombinate(clark, karol) -> not Blare(karol, becki)\nforall x (Bombinate(x, jenda) -> Foliaged(x))\nJapan(karol, clark) -> not Bombinate(clark, becki)\nnot Foliaged(karol) and not Blare(karol, jenda) -> Japan(jenda, karol)\n\nnot Japan(jenda, becki)\n\nBombinate(becki, jenda) and forall x (Bombinate(x, jenda) -> Foliaged(x)) -> therefore Foliaged(becki) Foliaged(becki) and forall x (Foliaged(x) -> Japan(x, jenda)) -> therefore Japan(becki, jenda) Bombinate(becki, jenda) and Japan(becki, jenda) and Bombinate(becki, jenda) and Japan(becki, jenda) -> Japan(jenda, becki) -> therefore Japan(jenda, becki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The mireielle is not courteous. The hermy bivouac the mireielle. The mathias is unpunished. The ediva entrain the hermy. If the hermy bivouac the mireielle and the hermy entrain the mireielle then the mireielle entrain the hermy. If the ediva does not like the mireielle then the ediva entrain the mathias. If someone is portable and they do not see the ediva then they need the mireielle. If someone is reflecting then they see the mireielle. If the ediva does not like the mathias then the mathias does not need the hermy. If someone bivouac the mireielle then they are reflecting. If the mathias entrain the ediva then the ediva does not like the hermy. If the mathias is not reflecting and the mathias does not need the mireielle then the mireielle entrain the mathias. The ediva does not need the mireielle.", "logic": "\nnot Courteous(mireielle)\nBivouac(hermy, mireielle)\nUnpunished(mathias)\nEntrain(ediva, hermy)\nBivouac(hermy, mireielle) and Entrain(hermy, mireielle) -> Entrain(mireielle, hermy)\nnot Bivouac(ediva, mireielle) -> Entrain(ediva, mathias)\nforall x (Portable(x) and not Entrain(x, ediva) -> Finalize(x, mireielle))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Entrain(x, mireielle))\nnot Bivouac(ediva, mathias) -> not Finalize(mathias, hermy)\nforall x (Bivouac(x, mireielle) -> Reflecting(x))\nEntrain(mathias, ediva) -> not Bivouac(ediva, hermy)\nnot Reflecting(mathias) and not Finalize(mathias, mireielle) -> Entrain(mireielle, mathias)\n\nnot Finalize(ediva, mireielle)\n\nforall x (Portable(x) and not Entrain(x, ediva) -> Finalize(x, mireielle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The simonette is not stray. The jenifer lock the simonette. The percy is aided. The dasya horsewhip the jenifer. If the jenifer lock the simonette and the jenifer horsewhip the simonette then the simonette horsewhip the jenifer. If the dasya does not like the simonette then the dasya horsewhip the percy. If someone is lxxiii and they do not see the dasya then they need the simonette. If someone is inquiring then they see the simonette. If the dasya does not like the percy then the percy does not need the jenifer. If someone lock the simonette then they are inquiring. If the percy horsewhip the dasya then the dasya does not like the jenifer. If the percy is not inquiring and the percy does not need the simonette then the simonette horsewhip the percy. The percy horsewhip the simonette.", "logic": "\nnot Stray(simonette)\nLock(jenifer, simonette)\nAided(percy)\nHorsewhip(dasya, jenifer)\nLock(jenifer, simonette) and Horsewhip(jenifer, simonette) -> Horsewhip(simonette, jenifer)\nnot Lock(dasya, simonette) -> Horsewhip(dasya, percy)\nforall x (Lxxiii(x) and not Horsewhip(x, dasya) -> Butt(x, simonette))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) -> Horsewhip(x, simonette))\nnot Lock(dasya, percy) -> not Butt(percy, jenifer)\nforall x (Lock(x, simonette) -> Inquiring(x))\nHorsewhip(percy, dasya) -> not Lock(dasya, jenifer)\nnot Inquiring(percy) and not Butt(percy, simonette) -> Horsewhip(simonette, percy)\n\nHorsewhip(percy, simonette)\n\nforall x (Inquiring(x) -> Horsewhip(x, simonette)) <- forall x (Lock(x, simonette) -> Inquiring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The lambert is not untasted. The randa preform the lambert. The kerrill is unprovable. The ansley span the randa. If the randa preform the lambert and the randa span the lambert then the lambert span the randa. If the ansley does not like the lambert then the ansley span the kerrill. If someone is thenal and they do not see the ansley then they need the lambert. If someone is rental then they see the lambert. If the ansley does not like the kerrill then the kerrill does not need the randa. If someone preform the lambert then they are rental. If the kerrill span the ansley then the ansley does not like the randa. If the kerrill is not rental and the kerrill does not need the lambert then the lambert span the kerrill. The lambert does not need the lambert.", "logic": "\nnot Untasted(lambert)\nPreform(randa, lambert)\nUnprovable(kerrill)\nSpan(ansley, randa)\nPreform(randa, lambert) and Span(randa, lambert) -> Span(lambert, randa)\nnot Preform(ansley, lambert) -> Span(ansley, kerrill)\nforall x (Thenal(x) and not Span(x, ansley) -> Affirm(x, lambert))\nforall x (Rental(x) -> Span(x, lambert))\nnot Preform(ansley, kerrill) -> not Affirm(kerrill, randa)\nforall x (Preform(x, lambert) -> Rental(x))\nSpan(kerrill, ansley) -> not Preform(ansley, randa)\nnot Rental(kerrill) and not Affirm(kerrill, lambert) -> Span(lambert, kerrill)\n\nnot Affirm(lambert, lambert)\n\nforall x (Thenal(x) and not Span(x, ansley) -> Affirm(x, lambert)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The korney is not speckless. The shelbi blunder the korney. The cornelle is liplike. The marthena hoot the shelbi. If the shelbi blunder the korney and the shelbi hoot the korney then the korney hoot the shelbi. If the marthena does not like the korney then the marthena hoot the cornelle. If someone is nonaligned and they do not see the marthena then they need the korney. If someone is splotched then they see the korney. If the marthena does not like the cornelle then the cornelle does not need the shelbi. If someone blunder the korney then they are splotched. If the cornelle hoot the marthena then the marthena does not like the shelbi. If the cornelle is not splotched and the cornelle does not need the korney then the korney hoot the cornelle. The shelbi navigate the korney.", "logic": "\nnot Speckless(korney)\nBlunder(shelbi, korney)\nLiplike(cornelle)\nHoot(marthena, shelbi)\nBlunder(shelbi, korney) and Hoot(shelbi, korney) -> Hoot(korney, shelbi)\nnot Blunder(marthena, korney) -> Hoot(marthena, cornelle)\nforall x (Nonaligned(x) and not Hoot(x, marthena) -> Navigate(x, korney))\nforall x (Splotched(x) -> Hoot(x, korney))\nnot Blunder(marthena, cornelle) -> not Navigate(cornelle, shelbi)\nforall x (Blunder(x, korney) -> Splotched(x))\nHoot(cornelle, marthena) -> not Blunder(marthena, shelbi)\nnot Splotched(cornelle) and not Navigate(cornelle, korney) -> Hoot(korney, cornelle)\n\nNavigate(shelbi, korney)\n\nforall x (Nonaligned(x) and not Hoot(x, marthena) -> Navigate(x, korney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The fatima is not opportune. The elnore catalyse the fatima. The tanner is pent. The scarface optimize the elnore. If the elnore catalyse the fatima and the elnore optimize the fatima then the fatima optimize the elnore. If the scarface does not like the fatima then the scarface optimize the tanner. If someone is airlike and they do not see the scarface then they need the fatima. If someone is isomeric then they see the fatima. If the scarface does not like the tanner then the tanner does not need the elnore. If someone catalyse the fatima then they are isomeric. If the tanner optimize the scarface then the scarface does not like the elnore. If the tanner is not isomeric and the tanner does not need the fatima then the fatima optimize the tanner. The fatima does not need the elnore.", "logic": "\nnot Opportune(fatima)\nCatalyse(elnore, fatima)\nPent(tanner)\nOptimize(scarface, elnore)\nCatalyse(elnore, fatima) and Optimize(elnore, fatima) -> Optimize(fatima, elnore)\nnot Catalyse(scarface, fatima) -> Optimize(scarface, tanner)\nforall x (Airlike(x) and not Optimize(x, scarface) -> Encore(x, fatima))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Optimize(x, fatima))\nnot Catalyse(scarface, tanner) -> not Encore(tanner, elnore)\nforall x (Catalyse(x, fatima) -> Isomeric(x))\nOptimize(tanner, scarface) -> not Catalyse(scarface, elnore)\nnot Isomeric(tanner) and not Encore(tanner, fatima) -> Optimize(fatima, tanner)\n\nnot Encore(fatima, elnore)\n\nnot Encore(fatima, elnore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The fionna is not timbered. The curtice sprinkle the fionna. The dorie is unassigned. The tess severalize the curtice. If the curtice sprinkle the fionna and the curtice severalize the fionna then the fionna severalize the curtice. If the tess does not like the fionna then the tess severalize the dorie. If someone is clad and they do not see the tess then they need the fionna. If someone is axiomatic then they see the fionna. If the tess does not like the dorie then the dorie does not need the curtice. If someone sprinkle the fionna then they are axiomatic. If the dorie severalize the tess then the tess does not like the curtice. If the dorie is not axiomatic and the dorie does not need the fionna then the fionna severalize the dorie. The dorie need the tess.", "logic": "\nnot Timbered(fionna)\nSprinkle(curtice, fionna)\nUnassigned(dorie)\nSeveralize(tess, curtice)\nSprinkle(curtice, fionna) and Severalize(curtice, fionna) -> Severalize(fionna, curtice)\nnot Sprinkle(tess, fionna) -> Severalize(tess, dorie)\nforall x (Clad(x) and not Severalize(x, tess) -> Need(x, fionna))\nforall x (Axiomatic(x) -> Severalize(x, fionna))\nnot Sprinkle(tess, dorie) -> not Need(dorie, curtice)\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, fionna) -> Axiomatic(x))\nSeveralize(dorie, tess) -> not Sprinkle(tess, curtice)\nnot Axiomatic(dorie) and not Need(dorie, fionna) -> Severalize(fionna, dorie)\n\nNeed(dorie, tess)\n\nNeed(dorie, tess) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The brock is not uncomely. The kerrill except the brock. The tedrick is dantesque. The abram blubber the kerrill. If the kerrill except the brock and the kerrill blubber the brock then the brock blubber the kerrill. If the abram does not like the brock then the abram blubber the tedrick. If someone is versatile and they do not see the abram then they need the brock. If someone is waterworn then they see the brock. If the abram does not like the tedrick then the tedrick does not need the kerrill. If someone except the brock then they are waterworn. If the tedrick blubber the abram then the abram does not like the kerrill. If the tedrick is not waterworn and the tedrick does not need the brock then the brock blubber the tedrick. The tedrick does not need the kerrill.", "logic": "\nnot Uncomely(brock)\nExcept(kerrill, brock)\nDantesque(tedrick)\nBlubber(abram, kerrill)\nExcept(kerrill, brock) and Blubber(kerrill, brock) -> Blubber(brock, kerrill)\nnot Except(abram, brock) -> Blubber(abram, tedrick)\nforall x (Versatile(x) and not Blubber(x, abram) -> Unsaddle(x, brock))\nforall x (Waterworn(x) -> Blubber(x, brock))\nnot Except(abram, tedrick) -> not Unsaddle(tedrick, kerrill)\nforall x (Except(x, brock) -> Waterworn(x))\nBlubber(tedrick, abram) -> not Except(abram, kerrill)\nnot Waterworn(tedrick) and not Unsaddle(tedrick, brock) -> Blubber(brock, tedrick)\n\nnot Unsaddle(tedrick, kerrill)\n\nnot Unsaddle(tedrick, kerrill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "The olympia is not unfamiliar. The anatol tyrannise the olympia. The pembroke is aculeate. The clemente catnap the anatol. If the anatol tyrannise the olympia and the anatol catnap the olympia then the olympia catnap the anatol. If the clemente does not like the olympia then the clemente catnap the pembroke. If someone is bumpy and they do not see the clemente then they need the olympia. If someone is blest then they see the olympia. If the clemente does not like the pembroke then the pembroke does not need the anatol. If someone tyrannise the olympia then they are blest. If the pembroke catnap the clemente then the clemente does not like the anatol. If the pembroke is not blest and the pembroke does not need the olympia then the olympia catnap the pembroke. The pembroke catnap the anatol.", "logic": "\nnot Unfamiliar(olympia)\nTyrannise(anatol, olympia)\nAculeate(pembroke)\nCatnap(clemente, anatol)\nTyrannise(anatol, olympia) and Catnap(anatol, olympia) -> Catnap(olympia, anatol)\nnot Tyrannise(clemente, olympia) -> Catnap(clemente, pembroke)\nforall x (Bumpy(x) and not Catnap(x, clemente) -> Meliorate(x, olympia))\nforall x (Blest(x) -> Catnap(x, olympia))\nnot Tyrannise(clemente, pembroke) -> not Meliorate(pembroke, anatol)\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, olympia) -> Blest(x))\nCatnap(pembroke, clemente) -> not Tyrannise(clemente, anatol)\nnot Blest(pembroke) and not Meliorate(pembroke, olympia) -> Catnap(olympia, pembroke)\n\nCatnap(pembroke, anatol)\n\nCatnap(pembroke, anatol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-582"} {"premises": "Dallas is matched. Daniele is matched. Allyce is faithful. All seminude, satirical people are matched. If Allyce is autosomal then Allyce is unlabelled. All unlabelled people are satirical. All matched people are unlabelled. Rough people are seminude. If Allyce is unlabelled then Allyce is not satirical. If someone is unlabelled and not satirical then they are innoxious. White people are innoxious. Daniele is matched.", "logic": "\nMatched(dallas)\nMatched(daniele)\nFaithful(allyce)\nforall x (Seminude(x) and Satirical(x) -> Matched(x))\nAutosomal(allyce) -> Unlabelled(allyce)\nforall x (Unlabelled(x) -> Satirical(x))\nforall x (Matched(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Faithful(x) -> Seminude(x))\nUnlabelled(allyce) -> not Satirical(allyce)\nforall x (Unlabelled(x) and not Satirical(x) -> Innoxious(x))\nforall x (Satirical(x) -> Innoxious(x))\n\nMatched(daniele)\n\ntherefore Matched(daniele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Isadore is motored. Kostas is motored. Geof is marine. All vital, decompound people are motored. If Geof is landscaped then Geof is vested. All vested people are decompound. All motored people are vested. Rough people are vital. If Geof is vested then Geof is not decompound. If someone is vested and not decompound then they are waterproof. White people are waterproof. Isadore is not motored.", "logic": "\nMotored(isadore)\nMotored(kostas)\nMarine(geof)\nforall x (Vital(x) and Decompound(x) -> Motored(x))\nLandscaped(geof) -> Vested(geof)\nforall x (Vested(x) -> Decompound(x))\nforall x (Motored(x) -> Vested(x))\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Vital(x))\nVested(geof) -> not Decompound(geof)\nforall x (Vested(x) and not Decompound(x) -> Waterproof(x))\nforall x (Decompound(x) -> Waterproof(x))\n\nnot Motored(isadore)\n\ntherefore Motored(isadore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Merl is parental. Ami is parental. Erik is unbaffled. All magic, contingent people are parental. If Erik is liveable then Erik is ionized. All ionized people are contingent. All parental people are ionized. Rough people are magic. If Erik is ionized then Erik is not contingent. If someone is ionized and not contingent then they are orphic. White people are orphic. Merl is ionized.", "logic": "\nParental(merl)\nParental(ami)\nUnbaffled(erik)\nforall x (Magic(x) and Contingent(x) -> Parental(x))\nLiveable(erik) -> Ionized(erik)\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Contingent(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Ionized(x))\nforall x (Unbaffled(x) -> Magic(x))\nIonized(erik) -> not Contingent(erik)\nforall x (Ionized(x) and not Contingent(x) -> Orphic(x))\nforall x (Contingent(x) -> Orphic(x))\n\nIonized(merl)\n\nParental(merl) and forall x (Parental(x) -> Ionized(x)) -> therefore Ionized(merl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Carey is crescendo. Essie is crescendo. Cleland is underage. All noble, alated people are crescendo. If Cleland is unisex then Cleland is albescent. All albescent people are alated. All crescendo people are albescent. Rough people are noble. If Cleland is albescent then Cleland is not alated. If someone is albescent and not alated then they are acetous. White people are acetous. Essie is not albescent.", "logic": "\nCrescendo(carey)\nCrescendo(essie)\nUnderage(cleland)\nforall x (Noble(x) and Alated(x) -> Crescendo(x))\nUnisex(cleland) -> Albescent(cleland)\nforall x (Albescent(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Albescent(x))\nforall x (Underage(x) -> Noble(x))\nAlbescent(cleland) -> not Alated(cleland)\nforall x (Albescent(x) and not Alated(x) -> Acetous(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Acetous(x))\n\nnot Albescent(essie)\n\nCrescendo(essie) and forall x (Crescendo(x) -> Albescent(x)) -> therefore Albescent(essie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Devon is buttony. Abbie is buttony. Hernando is roan. All unnoticed, phreatic people are buttony. If Hernando is dioecian then Hernando is mishnaic. All mishnaic people are phreatic. All buttony people are mishnaic. Rough people are unnoticed. If Hernando is mishnaic then Hernando is not phreatic. If someone is mishnaic and not phreatic then they are unthankful. White people are unthankful. Abbie is phreatic.", "logic": "\nButtony(devon)\nButtony(abbie)\nRoan(hernando)\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) and Phreatic(x) -> Buttony(x))\nDioecian(hernando) -> Mishnaic(hernando)\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Buttony(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Roan(x) -> Unnoticed(x))\nMishnaic(hernando) -> not Phreatic(hernando)\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) and not Phreatic(x) -> Unthankful(x))\nforall x (Phreatic(x) -> Unthankful(x))\n\nPhreatic(abbie)\n\nButtony(abbie) and forall x (Buttony(x) -> Mishnaic(x)) -> therefore Mishnaic(abbie) Mishnaic(abbie) and forall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Phreatic(x)) -> therefore Phreatic(abbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Phip is fusty. Ken is fusty. Susette is daughterly. All perirhinal, anagogical people are fusty. If Susette is chary then Susette is wayward. All wayward people are anagogical. All fusty people are wayward. Rough people are perirhinal. If Susette is wayward then Susette is not anagogical. If someone is wayward and not anagogical then they are silklike. White people are silklike. Phip is not anagogical.", "logic": "\nFusty(phip)\nFusty(ken)\nDaughterly(susette)\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) and Anagogical(x) -> Fusty(x))\nChary(susette) -> Wayward(susette)\nforall x (Wayward(x) -> Anagogical(x))\nforall x (Fusty(x) -> Wayward(x))\nforall x (Daughterly(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nWayward(susette) -> not Anagogical(susette)\nforall x (Wayward(x) and not Anagogical(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Anagogical(x) -> Silklike(x))\n\nnot Anagogical(phip)\n\nFusty(phip) and forall x (Fusty(x) -> Wayward(x)) -> therefore Wayward(phip) Wayward(phip) and forall x (Wayward(x) -> Anagogical(x)) -> therefore Anagogical(phip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Enrika is anginose. Layne is anginose. Rourke is mixed. All deathless, oncologic people are anginose. If Rourke is lifelong then Rourke is sexy. All sexy people are oncologic. All anginose people are sexy. Rough people are deathless. If Rourke is sexy then Rourke is not oncologic. If someone is sexy and not oncologic then they are volitional. White people are volitional. Enrika is volitional.", "logic": "\nAnginose(enrika)\nAnginose(layne)\nMixed(rourke)\nforall x (Deathless(x) and Oncologic(x) -> Anginose(x))\nLifelong(rourke) -> Sexy(rourke)\nforall x (Sexy(x) -> Oncologic(x))\nforall x (Anginose(x) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Mixed(x) -> Deathless(x))\nSexy(rourke) -> not Oncologic(rourke)\nforall x (Sexy(x) and not Oncologic(x) -> Volitional(x))\nforall x (Oncologic(x) -> Volitional(x))\n\nVolitional(enrika)\n\nAnginose(enrika) and forall x (Anginose(x) -> Sexy(x)) -> therefore Sexy(enrika) Sexy(enrika) and forall x (Sexy(x) -> Oncologic(x)) -> therefore Oncologic(enrika) Oncologic(enrika) and forall x (Oncologic(x) -> Volitional(x)) -> therefore Volitional(enrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Harvie is monodical. Idalina is monodical. Iormina is meager. All abatable, languid people are monodical. If Iormina is noseless then Iormina is twilit. All twilit people are languid. All monodical people are twilit. Rough people are abatable. If Iormina is twilit then Iormina is not languid. If someone is twilit and not languid then they are unexploded. White people are unexploded. Idalina is not unexploded.", "logic": "\nMonodical(harvie)\nMonodical(idalina)\nMeager(iormina)\nforall x (Abatable(x) and Languid(x) -> Monodical(x))\nNoseless(iormina) -> Twilit(iormina)\nforall x (Twilit(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> Twilit(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) -> Abatable(x))\nTwilit(iormina) -> not Languid(iormina)\nforall x (Twilit(x) and not Languid(x) -> Unexploded(x))\nforall x (Languid(x) -> Unexploded(x))\n\nnot Unexploded(idalina)\n\nMonodical(idalina) and forall x (Monodical(x) -> Twilit(x)) -> therefore Twilit(idalina) Twilit(idalina) and forall x (Twilit(x) -> Languid(x)) -> therefore Languid(idalina) Languid(idalina) and forall x (Languid(x) -> Unexploded(x)) -> therefore Unexploded(idalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Danita is jangly. Pet is jangly. Pet is ropey. All motional, saltish people are jangly. If Pet is chartreuse then Pet is uniform. All uniform people are saltish. All jangly people are uniform. Rough people are motional. If Pet is uniform then Pet is not saltish. If someone is uniform and not saltish then they are congestive. White people are congestive. Pet is not congestive.", "logic": "\nJangly(danita)\nJangly(pet)\nRopey(pet)\nforall x (Motional(x) and Saltish(x) -> Jangly(x))\nChartreuse(pet) -> Uniform(pet)\nforall x (Uniform(x) -> Saltish(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) -> Uniform(x))\nforall x (Ropey(x) -> Motional(x))\nUniform(pet) -> not Saltish(pet)\nforall x (Uniform(x) and not Saltish(x) -> Congestive(x))\nforall x (Saltish(x) -> Congestive(x))\n\nnot Congestive(pet)\n\nforall x (Saltish(x) -> Congestive(x)) <- forall x (Uniform(x) -> Saltish(x)) <- forall x (Jangly(x) -> Uniform(x)) <- forall x (Motional(x) and Saltish(x) -> Jangly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Ilka is vitriolic. Mark is vitriolic. Anetta is hourly. All endowed, funky people are vitriolic. If Anetta is vertical then Anetta is membranous. All membranous people are funky. All vitriolic people are membranous. Rough people are endowed. If Anetta is membranous then Anetta is not funky. If someone is membranous and not funky then they are chunky. White people are chunky. Anetta is membranous.", "logic": "\nVitriolic(ilka)\nVitriolic(mark)\nHourly(anetta)\nforall x (Endowed(x) and Funky(x) -> Vitriolic(x))\nVertical(anetta) -> Membranous(anetta)\nforall x (Membranous(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Vitriolic(x) -> Membranous(x))\nforall x (Hourly(x) -> Endowed(x))\nMembranous(anetta) -> not Funky(anetta)\nforall x (Membranous(x) and not Funky(x) -> Chunky(x))\nforall x (Funky(x) -> Chunky(x))\n\nMembranous(anetta)\n\nforall x (Vitriolic(x) -> Membranous(x)) <- forall x (Endowed(x) and Funky(x) -> Vitriolic(x)) <- forall x (Membranous(x) -> Funky(x)) <- Vertical(anetta) -> Membranous(anetta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Rozamond is humane. Glenna is humane. Jake is nonmetal. All libelous, awninged people are humane. If Jake is clxv then Jake is embezzled. All embezzled people are awninged. All humane people are embezzled. Rough people are libelous. If Jake is embezzled then Jake is not awninged. If someone is embezzled and not awninged then they are cloddish. White people are cloddish. Glenna is not libelous.", "logic": "\nHumane(rozamond)\nHumane(glenna)\nNonmetal(jake)\nforall x (Libelous(x) and Awninged(x) -> Humane(x))\nClxv(jake) -> Embezzled(jake)\nforall x (Embezzled(x) -> Awninged(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) -> Embezzled(x))\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Libelous(x))\nEmbezzled(jake) -> not Awninged(jake)\nforall x (Embezzled(x) and not Awninged(x) -> Cloddish(x))\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Cloddish(x))\n\nnot Libelous(glenna)\n\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) -> Libelous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Laurence is swelled. Floyd is swelled. Alicia is adapted. All overhanded, unedifying people are swelled. If Alicia is unliveable then Alicia is senile. All senile people are unedifying. All swelled people are senile. Rough people are overhanded. If Alicia is senile then Alicia is not unedifying. If someone is senile and not unedifying then they are pharyngeal. White people are pharyngeal. Alicia is unedifying.", "logic": "\nSwelled(laurence)\nSwelled(floyd)\nAdapted(alicia)\nforall x (Overhanded(x) and Unedifying(x) -> Swelled(x))\nUnliveable(alicia) -> Senile(alicia)\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Unedifying(x))\nforall x (Swelled(x) -> Senile(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) -> Overhanded(x))\nSenile(alicia) -> not Unedifying(alicia)\nforall x (Senile(x) and not Unedifying(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Unedifying(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\n\nUnedifying(alicia)\n\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Unedifying(x)) <- forall x (Swelled(x) -> Senile(x)) <- forall x (Overhanded(x) and Unedifying(x) -> Swelled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Janaya is abrupt. Brandice is abrupt. Renee is fussy. All grayish, deviate people are abrupt. If Renee is saute then Renee is takeout. All takeout people are deviate. All abrupt people are takeout. Rough people are grayish. If Renee is takeout then Renee is not deviate. If someone is takeout and not deviate then they are sandlike. White people are sandlike. Janaya is not saute.", "logic": "\nAbrupt(janaya)\nAbrupt(brandice)\nFussy(renee)\nforall x (Grayish(x) and Deviate(x) -> Abrupt(x))\nSaute(renee) -> Takeout(renee)\nforall x (Takeout(x) -> Deviate(x))\nforall x (Abrupt(x) -> Takeout(x))\nforall x (Fussy(x) -> Grayish(x))\nTakeout(renee) -> not Deviate(renee)\nforall x (Takeout(x) and not Deviate(x) -> Sandlike(x))\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Sandlike(x))\n\nnot Saute(janaya)\n\nnot Saute(janaya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Joice is aetiologic. Moreen is aetiologic. Rolfe is bloodshot. All wonted, fervent people are aetiologic. If Rolfe is harmless then Rolfe is uninformed. All uninformed people are fervent. All aetiologic people are uninformed. Rough people are wonted. If Rolfe is uninformed then Rolfe is not fervent. If someone is uninformed and not fervent then they are elder. White people are elder. Moreen is harmless.", "logic": "\nAetiologic(joice)\nAetiologic(moreen)\nBloodshot(rolfe)\nforall x (Wonted(x) and Fervent(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nHarmless(rolfe) -> Uninformed(rolfe)\nforall x (Uninformed(x) -> Fervent(x))\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) -> Uninformed(x))\nforall x (Bloodshot(x) -> Wonted(x))\nUninformed(rolfe) -> not Fervent(rolfe)\nforall x (Uninformed(x) and not Fervent(x) -> Elder(x))\nforall x (Fervent(x) -> Elder(x))\n\nHarmless(moreen)\n\nHarmless(moreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Pepita is bleached. Kimberley is bleached. Dorella is bolshy. All projected, metallike people are bleached. If Dorella is shining then Dorella is brotherly. All brotherly people are metallike. All bleached people are brotherly. Rough people are projected. If Dorella is brotherly then Dorella is not metallike. If someone is brotherly and not metallike then they are lamented. White people are lamented. Kimberley is not bolshy.", "logic": "\nBleached(pepita)\nBleached(kimberley)\nBolshy(dorella)\nforall x (Projected(x) and Metallike(x) -> Bleached(x))\nShining(dorella) -> Brotherly(dorella)\nforall x (Brotherly(x) -> Metallike(x))\nforall x (Bleached(x) -> Brotherly(x))\nforall x (Bolshy(x) -> Projected(x))\nBrotherly(dorella) -> not Metallike(dorella)\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and not Metallike(x) -> Lamented(x))\nforall x (Metallike(x) -> Lamented(x))\n\nnot Bolshy(kimberley)\n\nnot Bolshy(kimberley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Kendra is cisalpine. Ashley is cisalpine. Tadeas is synonymous. All ransomed, unsatiated people are cisalpine. If Tadeas is phosphoric then Tadeas is intragroup. All intragroup people are unsatiated. All cisalpine people are intragroup. Rough people are ransomed. If Tadeas is intragroup then Tadeas is not unsatiated. If someone is intragroup and not unsatiated then they are titular. White people are titular. Kendra is synonymous.", "logic": "\nCisalpine(kendra)\nCisalpine(ashley)\nSynonymous(tadeas)\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Unsatiated(x) -> Cisalpine(x))\nPhosphoric(tadeas) -> Intragroup(tadeas)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Cisalpine(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) -> Ransomed(x))\nIntragroup(tadeas) -> not Unsatiated(tadeas)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) and not Unsatiated(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) -> Titular(x))\n\nSynonymous(kendra)\n\nSynonymous(kendra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "Wynton is naiant. Marthe is naiant. Darby is unbooked. Donelle is pearly. Smart, pearly people are huffy. Nice people are regional. Round people are tense. If Marthe is grapey then Marthe is unbooked. All pearly people are tense. Smart, regional people are pearly. Wynton is naiant.", "logic": "\nNaiant(wynton)\nNaiant(marthe)\nUnbooked(darby)\nPearly(donelle)\nforall x (Tense(x) and Pearly(x) -> Huffy(x))\nforall x (Huffy(x) -> Regional(x))\nforall x (Naiant(x) -> Tense(x))\nGrapey(marthe) -> Unbooked(marthe)\nforall x (Pearly(x) -> Tense(x))\nforall x (Tense(x) and Regional(x) -> Pearly(x))\n\nNaiant(wynton)\n\ntherefore Naiant(wynton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Elianore is glace. Aamir is glace. Yaakov is wakeful. Nico is hindu. Smart, hindu people are crossbred. Nice people are brimming. Round people are sisterly. If Aamir is matted then Aamir is wakeful. All hindu people are sisterly. Smart, brimming people are hindu. Yaakov is not wakeful.", "logic": "\nGlace(elianore)\nGlace(aamir)\nWakeful(yaakov)\nHindu(nico)\nforall x (Sisterly(x) and Hindu(x) -> Crossbred(x))\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> Brimming(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) -> Sisterly(x))\nMatted(aamir) -> Wakeful(aamir)\nforall x (Hindu(x) -> Sisterly(x))\nforall x (Sisterly(x) and Brimming(x) -> Hindu(x))\n\nnot Wakeful(yaakov)\n\ntherefore Wakeful(yaakov)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Hiralal is cynical. Bret is cynical. Fawn is unvalued. Ilyssa is archeozoic. Smart, archeozoic people are festive. Nice people are unloved. Round people are preferable. If Bret is voltaic then Bret is unvalued. All archeozoic people are preferable. Smart, unloved people are archeozoic. Bret is preferable.", "logic": "\nCynical(hiralal)\nCynical(bret)\nUnvalued(fawn)\nArcheozoic(ilyssa)\nforall x (Preferable(x) and Archeozoic(x) -> Festive(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Unloved(x))\nforall x (Cynical(x) -> Preferable(x))\nVoltaic(bret) -> Unvalued(bret)\nforall x (Archeozoic(x) -> Preferable(x))\nforall x (Preferable(x) and Unloved(x) -> Archeozoic(x))\n\nPreferable(bret)\n\nCynical(bret) and forall x (Cynical(x) -> Preferable(x)) -> therefore Preferable(bret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Pamelina is broken. Klee is broken. Bernardo is cottony. Lon is unprepared. Smart, unprepared people are distaff. Nice people are dorian. Round people are exemplary. If Klee is isomorphic then Klee is cottony. All unprepared people are exemplary. Smart, dorian people are unprepared. Lon is not exemplary.", "logic": "\nBroken(pamelina)\nBroken(klee)\nCottony(bernardo)\nUnprepared(lon)\nforall x (Exemplary(x) and Unprepared(x) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Broken(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nIsomorphic(klee) -> Cottony(klee)\nforall x (Unprepared(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Exemplary(x) and Dorian(x) -> Unprepared(x))\n\nnot Exemplary(lon)\n\nUnprepared(lon) and forall x (Unprepared(x) -> Exemplary(x)) -> therefore Exemplary(lon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Immanuel is jungian. Mortie is jungian. Nick is lenitive. Zeke is convivial. Smart, convivial people are ruandan. Nice people are illicit. Round people are dwindling. If Mortie is optical then Mortie is lenitive. All convivial people are dwindling. Smart, illicit people are convivial. Zeke is ruandan.", "logic": "\nJungian(immanuel)\nJungian(mortie)\nLenitive(nick)\nConvivial(zeke)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Convivial(x) -> Ruandan(x))\nforall x (Ruandan(x) -> Illicit(x))\nforall x (Jungian(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nOptical(mortie) -> Lenitive(mortie)\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and Illicit(x) -> Convivial(x))\n\nRuandan(zeke)\n\nConvivial(zeke) and forall x (Convivial(x) -> Dwindling(x)) -> therefore Dwindling(zeke) Dwindling(zeke) and Convivial(zeke) and forall x (Dwindling(x) and Convivial(x) -> Ruandan(x)) -> therefore Ruandan(zeke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Bret is eastbound. Hailee is eastbound. Torie is violent. Jocelyn is bilious. Smart, bilious people are twinkly. Nice people are excessive. Round people are sleepy. If Hailee is coppery then Hailee is violent. All bilious people are sleepy. Smart, excessive people are bilious. Jocelyn is not twinkly.", "logic": "\nEastbound(bret)\nEastbound(hailee)\nViolent(torie)\nBilious(jocelyn)\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Bilious(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Excessive(x))\nforall x (Eastbound(x) -> Sleepy(x))\nCoppery(hailee) -> Violent(hailee)\nforall x (Bilious(x) -> Sleepy(x))\nforall x (Sleepy(x) and Excessive(x) -> Bilious(x))\n\nnot Twinkly(jocelyn)\n\nBilious(jocelyn) and forall x (Bilious(x) -> Sleepy(x)) -> therefore Sleepy(jocelyn) Sleepy(jocelyn) and Bilious(jocelyn) and forall x (Sleepy(x) and Bilious(x) -> Twinkly(x)) -> therefore Twinkly(jocelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Marissa is tinned. Ambrosius is tinned. Tiebout is historied. Nanine is reformable. Smart, reformable people are gleaming. Nice people are like. Round people are impervious. If Ambrosius is cislunar then Ambrosius is historied. All reformable people are impervious. Smart, like people are reformable. Nanine is like.", "logic": "\nTinned(marissa)\nTinned(ambrosius)\nHistoried(tiebout)\nReformable(nanine)\nforall x (Impervious(x) and Reformable(x) -> Gleaming(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Tinned(x) -> Impervious(x))\nCislunar(ambrosius) -> Historied(ambrosius)\nforall x (Reformable(x) -> Impervious(x))\nforall x (Impervious(x) and Like(x) -> Reformable(x))\n\nLike(nanine)\n\nReformable(nanine) and forall x (Reformable(x) -> Impervious(x)) -> therefore Impervious(nanine) Impervious(nanine) and Reformable(nanine) and forall x (Impervious(x) and Reformable(x) -> Gleaming(x)) -> therefore Gleaming(nanine) Gleaming(nanine) and forall x (Gleaming(x) -> Like(x)) -> therefore Like(nanine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Sander is colloidal. Teodoor is colloidal. Goldina is citric. Damita is biform. Smart, biform people are bully. Nice people are eternal. Round people are crotchety. If Teodoor is chiasmal then Teodoor is citric. All biform people are crotchety. Smart, eternal people are biform. Damita is not eternal.", "logic": "\nColloidal(sander)\nColloidal(teodoor)\nCitric(goldina)\nBiform(damita)\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Biform(x) -> Bully(x))\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Eternal(x))\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Crotchety(x))\nChiasmal(teodoor) -> Citric(teodoor)\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Crotchety(x))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Eternal(x) -> Biform(x))\n\nnot Eternal(damita)\n\nBiform(damita) and forall x (Biform(x) -> Crotchety(x)) -> therefore Crotchety(damita) Crotchety(damita) and Biform(damita) and forall x (Crotchety(x) and Biform(x) -> Bully(x)) -> therefore Bully(damita) Bully(damita) and forall x (Bully(x) -> Eternal(x)) -> therefore Eternal(damita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Emmanuel is automatic. Thurstan is automatic. Lydia is limber. Archibold is waning. Smart, waning people are needlelike. Nice people are friendless. Round people are resilient. If Thurstan is puranic then Thurstan is limber. All waning people are resilient. Smart, friendless people are waning. Lydia is not resilient.", "logic": "\nAutomatic(emmanuel)\nAutomatic(thurstan)\nLimber(lydia)\nWaning(archibold)\nforall x (Resilient(x) and Waning(x) -> Needlelike(x))\nforall x (Needlelike(x) -> Friendless(x))\nforall x (Automatic(x) -> Resilient(x))\nPuranic(thurstan) -> Limber(thurstan)\nforall x (Waning(x) -> Resilient(x))\nforall x (Resilient(x) and Friendless(x) -> Waning(x))\n\nnot Resilient(lydia)\n\nforall x (Waning(x) -> Resilient(x)) <- forall x (Resilient(x) and Friendless(x) -> Waning(x)) <- forall x (Automatic(x) -> Resilient(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Leia is recumbent. Henry is recumbent. Ximenez is nonionized. Martelle is saltlike. Smart, saltlike people are tilled. Nice people are upmarket. Round people are monoecious. If Henry is lonely then Henry is nonionized. All saltlike people are monoecious. Smart, upmarket people are saltlike. Henry is tilled.", "logic": "\nRecumbent(leia)\nRecumbent(henry)\nNonionized(ximenez)\nSaltlike(martelle)\nforall x (Monoecious(x) and Saltlike(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Tilled(x) -> Upmarket(x))\nforall x (Recumbent(x) -> Monoecious(x))\nLonely(henry) -> Nonionized(henry)\nforall x (Saltlike(x) -> Monoecious(x))\nforall x (Monoecious(x) and Upmarket(x) -> Saltlike(x))\n\nTilled(henry)\n\nforall x (Monoecious(x) and Saltlike(x) -> Tilled(x)) <- forall x (Monoecious(x) and Upmarket(x) -> Saltlike(x)) <- forall x (Tilled(x) -> Upmarket(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Ramsay is redeeming. Cooper is redeeming. Nadeen is aciduric. Anitra is euphoric. Smart, euphoric people are sunrise. Nice people are smuggled. Round people are afloat. If Cooper is coeval then Cooper is aciduric. All euphoric people are afloat. Smart, smuggled people are euphoric. Nadeen is not euphoric.", "logic": "\nRedeeming(ramsay)\nRedeeming(cooper)\nAciduric(nadeen)\nEuphoric(anitra)\nforall x (Afloat(x) and Euphoric(x) -> Sunrise(x))\nforall x (Sunrise(x) -> Smuggled(x))\nforall x (Redeeming(x) -> Afloat(x))\nCoeval(cooper) -> Aciduric(cooper)\nforall x (Euphoric(x) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Afloat(x) and Smuggled(x) -> Euphoric(x))\n\nnot Euphoric(nadeen)\n\nforall x (Afloat(x) and Smuggled(x) -> Euphoric(x)) <- forall x (Redeeming(x) -> Afloat(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Mac is african. Jake is african. Betteanne is totipotent. Skell is compulsive. Smart, compulsive people are shielded. Nice people are chiasmic. Round people are sizzling. If Jake is nebulous then Jake is totipotent. All compulsive people are sizzling. Smart, chiasmic people are compulsive. Jake is compulsive.", "logic": "\nAfrican(mac)\nAfrican(jake)\nTotipotent(betteanne)\nCompulsive(skell)\nforall x (Sizzling(x) and Compulsive(x) -> Shielded(x))\nforall x (Shielded(x) -> Chiasmic(x))\nforall x (African(x) -> Sizzling(x))\nNebulous(jake) -> Totipotent(jake)\nforall x (Compulsive(x) -> Sizzling(x))\nforall x (Sizzling(x) and Chiasmic(x) -> Compulsive(x))\n\nCompulsive(jake)\n\nforall x (Sizzling(x) and Chiasmic(x) -> Compulsive(x)) <- forall x (Shielded(x) -> Chiasmic(x)) <- forall x (Sizzling(x) and Compulsive(x) -> Shielded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Gaston is anaemic. Lemuel is anaemic. Celina is aliform. Lillis is admissible. Smart, admissible people are bared. Nice people are abhorrent. Round people are satiric. If Lemuel is clad then Lemuel is aliform. All admissible people are satiric. Smart, abhorrent people are admissible. Lillis is not aliform.", "logic": "\nAnaemic(gaston)\nAnaemic(lemuel)\nAliform(celina)\nAdmissible(lillis)\nforall x (Satiric(x) and Admissible(x) -> Bared(x))\nforall x (Bared(x) -> Abhorrent(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Satiric(x))\nClad(lemuel) -> Aliform(lemuel)\nforall x (Admissible(x) -> Satiric(x))\nforall x (Satiric(x) and Abhorrent(x) -> Admissible(x))\n\nnot Aliform(lillis)\n\nnot Aliform(lillis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Henryetta is driven. Bryn is driven. Flin is uninitiate. Lyn is boskopoid. Smart, boskopoid people are admittable. Nice people are frumpy. Round people are currish. If Bryn is sleeping then Bryn is uninitiate. All boskopoid people are currish. Smart, frumpy people are boskopoid. Flin is driven.", "logic": "\nDriven(henryetta)\nDriven(bryn)\nUninitiate(flin)\nBoskopoid(lyn)\nforall x (Currish(x) and Boskopoid(x) -> Admittable(x))\nforall x (Admittable(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) -> Currish(x))\nSleeping(bryn) -> Uninitiate(bryn)\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Currish(x))\nforall x (Currish(x) and Frumpy(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\n\nDriven(flin)\n\nDriven(flin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Shirlene is unassured. Hannibal is unassured. Darcey is deathlike. Suellen is demure. Smart, demure people are pretend. Nice people are glace. Round people are rearing. If Hannibal is skinned then Hannibal is deathlike. All demure people are rearing. Smart, glace people are demure. Darcey is not skinned.", "logic": "\nUnassured(shirlene)\nUnassured(hannibal)\nDeathlike(darcey)\nDemure(suellen)\nforall x (Rearing(x) and Demure(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Pretend(x) -> Glace(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Rearing(x))\nSkinned(hannibal) -> Deathlike(hannibal)\nforall x (Demure(x) -> Rearing(x))\nforall x (Rearing(x) and Glace(x) -> Demure(x))\n\nnot Skinned(darcey)\n\nnot Skinned(darcey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "Lynnett is connected. Vanni is connected. Angelita is actinic. Vonnie is spherical. Smart, spherical people are organic. Nice people are lancelike. Round people are consular. If Vanni is pierced then Vanni is actinic. All spherical people are consular. Smart, lancelike people are spherical. Vonnie is connected.", "logic": "\nConnected(lynnett)\nConnected(vanni)\nActinic(angelita)\nSpherical(vonnie)\nforall x (Consular(x) and Spherical(x) -> Organic(x))\nforall x (Organic(x) -> Lancelike(x))\nforall x (Connected(x) -> Consular(x))\nPierced(vanni) -> Actinic(vanni)\nforall x (Spherical(x) -> Consular(x))\nforall x (Consular(x) and Lancelike(x) -> Spherical(x))\n\nConnected(vonnie)\n\nConnected(vonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1316"} {"premises": "The damon is nazi. The damon nurse the heddi. The damon deport the heddi. The damon deport the marlane. The heddi nurse the damon. The marlane restrict the damon. The marlane is maltreated. The marlane is revolting. The inna restrict the heddi. The inna nurse the damon. If someone is revolting then they like the heddi. If someone nurse the inna then the inna nurse the marlane. If the inna deport the heddi and the heddi nurse the inna then the heddi nurse the damon. If someone restrict the damon and they like the damon then they like the inna. If the heddi restrict the inna and the inna deport the marlane then the inna is thenar. If someone restrict the heddi then they chase the damon. The marlane is revolting.", "logic": "\nNazi(damon)\nNurse(damon, heddi)\nDeport(damon, heddi)\nDeport(damon, marlane)\nNurse(heddi, damon)\nRestrict(marlane, damon)\nMaltreated(marlane)\nRevolting(marlane)\nRestrict(inna, heddi)\nNurse(inna, damon)\nforall x (Revolting(x) -> Nurse(x, heddi))\nforall x (Nurse(x, inna) -> Nurse(inna, marlane))\nDeport(inna, heddi) and Nurse(heddi, inna) -> Nurse(heddi, damon)\nforall x (Restrict(x, damon) and Nurse(x, damon) -> Nurse(x, inna))\nRestrict(heddi, inna) and Deport(inna, marlane) -> Thenar(inna)\nforall x (Restrict(x, heddi) -> Restrict(x, damon))\n\nRevolting(marlane)\n\ntherefore Revolting(marlane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The kissee is homemade. The kissee wipe the letitia. The kissee bacterize the letitia. The kissee bacterize the blakelee. The letitia wipe the kissee. The blakelee reorient the kissee. The blakelee is cresson. The blakelee is undogmatic. The toinette reorient the letitia. The toinette wipe the kissee. If someone is undogmatic then they like the letitia. If someone wipe the toinette then the toinette wipe the blakelee. If the toinette bacterize the letitia and the letitia wipe the toinette then the letitia wipe the kissee. If someone reorient the kissee and they like the kissee then they like the toinette. If the letitia reorient the toinette and the toinette bacterize the blakelee then the toinette is acidulous. If someone reorient the letitia then they chase the kissee. The kissee is not homemade.", "logic": "\nHomemade(kissee)\nWipe(kissee, letitia)\nBacterize(kissee, letitia)\nBacterize(kissee, blakelee)\nWipe(letitia, kissee)\nReorient(blakelee, kissee)\nCresson(blakelee)\nUndogmatic(blakelee)\nReorient(toinette, letitia)\nWipe(toinette, kissee)\nforall x (Undogmatic(x) -> Wipe(x, letitia))\nforall x (Wipe(x, toinette) -> Wipe(toinette, blakelee))\nBacterize(toinette, letitia) and Wipe(letitia, toinette) -> Wipe(letitia, kissee)\nforall x (Reorient(x, kissee) and Wipe(x, kissee) -> Wipe(x, toinette))\nReorient(letitia, toinette) and Bacterize(toinette, blakelee) -> Acidulous(toinette)\nforall x (Reorient(x, letitia) -> Reorient(x, kissee))\n\nnot Homemade(kissee)\n\ntherefore Homemade(kissee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The gabriello is unaged. The gabriello vote the nil. The gabriello imbibe the nil. The gabriello imbibe the ursala. The nil vote the gabriello. The ursala riffle the gabriello. The ursala is sibilant. The ursala is tannic. The vivien riffle the nil. The vivien vote the gabriello. If someone is tannic then they like the nil. If someone vote the vivien then the vivien vote the ursala. If the vivien imbibe the nil and the nil vote the vivien then the nil vote the gabriello. If someone riffle the gabriello and they like the gabriello then they like the vivien. If the nil riffle the vivien and the vivien imbibe the ursala then the vivien is adjacent. If someone riffle the nil then they chase the gabriello. The ursala vote the nil.", "logic": "\nUnaged(gabriello)\nVote(gabriello, nil)\nImbibe(gabriello, nil)\nImbibe(gabriello, ursala)\nVote(nil, gabriello)\nRiffle(ursala, gabriello)\nSibilant(ursala)\nTannic(ursala)\nRiffle(vivien, nil)\nVote(vivien, gabriello)\nforall x (Tannic(x) -> Vote(x, nil))\nforall x (Vote(x, vivien) -> Vote(vivien, ursala))\nImbibe(vivien, nil) and Vote(nil, vivien) -> Vote(nil, gabriello)\nforall x (Riffle(x, gabriello) and Vote(x, gabriello) -> Vote(x, vivien))\nRiffle(nil, vivien) and Imbibe(vivien, ursala) -> Adjacent(vivien)\nforall x (Riffle(x, nil) -> Riffle(x, gabriello))\n\nVote(ursala, nil)\n\nTannic(ursala) and forall x (Tannic(x) -> Vote(x, nil)) -> therefore Vote(ursala, nil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The georg is flying. The georg broadcast the joscelin. The georg welter the joscelin. The georg welter the alfreda. The joscelin broadcast the georg. The alfreda focus the georg. The alfreda is arachnoid. The alfreda is jetting. The violette focus the joscelin. The violette broadcast the georg. If someone is jetting then they like the joscelin. If someone broadcast the violette then the violette broadcast the alfreda. If the violette welter the joscelin and the joscelin broadcast the violette then the joscelin broadcast the georg. If someone focus the georg and they like the georg then they like the violette. If the joscelin focus the violette and the violette welter the alfreda then the violette is scythian. If someone focus the joscelin then they chase the georg. The violette does not chase the georg.", "logic": "\nFlying(georg)\nBroadcast(georg, joscelin)\nWelter(georg, joscelin)\nWelter(georg, alfreda)\nBroadcast(joscelin, georg)\nFocus(alfreda, georg)\nArachnoid(alfreda)\nJetting(alfreda)\nFocus(violette, joscelin)\nBroadcast(violette, georg)\nforall x (Jetting(x) -> Broadcast(x, joscelin))\nforall x (Broadcast(x, violette) -> Broadcast(violette, alfreda))\nWelter(violette, joscelin) and Broadcast(joscelin, violette) -> Broadcast(joscelin, georg)\nforall x (Focus(x, georg) and Broadcast(x, georg) -> Broadcast(x, violette))\nFocus(joscelin, violette) and Welter(violette, alfreda) -> Scythian(violette)\nforall x (Focus(x, joscelin) -> Focus(x, georg))\n\nnot Focus(violette, georg)\n\nFocus(violette, joscelin) and forall x (Focus(x, joscelin) -> Focus(x, georg)) -> therefore Focus(violette, georg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The erinna is zero. The erinna flatten the merlina. The erinna wink the merlina. The erinna wink the bartlett. The merlina flatten the erinna. The bartlett befog the erinna. The bartlett is unmoved. The bartlett is sulphurous. The kathe befog the merlina. The kathe flatten the erinna. If someone is sulphurous then they like the merlina. If someone flatten the kathe then the kathe flatten the bartlett. If the kathe wink the merlina and the merlina flatten the kathe then the merlina flatten the erinna. If someone befog the erinna and they like the erinna then they like the kathe. If the merlina befog the kathe and the kathe wink the bartlett then the kathe is negroid. If someone befog the merlina then they chase the erinna. The kathe flatten the kathe.", "logic": "\nZero(erinna)\nFlatten(erinna, merlina)\nWink(erinna, merlina)\nWink(erinna, bartlett)\nFlatten(merlina, erinna)\nBefog(bartlett, erinna)\nUnmoved(bartlett)\nSulphurous(bartlett)\nBefog(kathe, merlina)\nFlatten(kathe, erinna)\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) -> Flatten(x, merlina))\nforall x (Flatten(x, kathe) -> Flatten(kathe, bartlett))\nWink(kathe, merlina) and Flatten(merlina, kathe) -> Flatten(merlina, erinna)\nforall x (Befog(x, erinna) and Flatten(x, erinna) -> Flatten(x, kathe))\nBefog(merlina, kathe) and Wink(kathe, bartlett) -> Negroid(kathe)\nforall x (Befog(x, merlina) -> Befog(x, erinna))\n\nFlatten(kathe, kathe)\n\nBefog(kathe, merlina) and forall x (Befog(x, merlina) -> Befog(x, erinna)) -> therefore Befog(kathe, erinna) Befog(kathe, erinna) and Flatten(kathe, erinna) and forall x (Befog(x, erinna) and Flatten(x, erinna) -> Flatten(x, kathe)) -> therefore Flatten(kathe, kathe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The jeffie is diffused. The jeffie lodge the coleman. The jeffie interpose the coleman. The jeffie interpose the wendy. The coleman lodge the jeffie. The wendy lead the jeffie. The wendy is astylar. The wendy is shelflike. The karin lead the coleman. The karin lodge the jeffie. If someone is shelflike then they like the coleman. If someone lodge the karin then the karin lodge the wendy. If the karin interpose the coleman and the coleman lodge the karin then the coleman lodge the jeffie. If someone lead the jeffie and they like the jeffie then they like the karin. If the coleman lead the karin and the karin interpose the wendy then the karin is mouselike. If someone lead the coleman then they chase the jeffie. The karin does not like the karin.", "logic": "\nDiffused(jeffie)\nLodge(jeffie, coleman)\nInterpose(jeffie, coleman)\nInterpose(jeffie, wendy)\nLodge(coleman, jeffie)\nLead(wendy, jeffie)\nAstylar(wendy)\nShelflike(wendy)\nLead(karin, coleman)\nLodge(karin, jeffie)\nforall x (Shelflike(x) -> Lodge(x, coleman))\nforall x (Lodge(x, karin) -> Lodge(karin, wendy))\nInterpose(karin, coleman) and Lodge(coleman, karin) -> Lodge(coleman, jeffie)\nforall x (Lead(x, jeffie) and Lodge(x, jeffie) -> Lodge(x, karin))\nLead(coleman, karin) and Interpose(karin, wendy) -> Mouselike(karin)\nforall x (Lead(x, coleman) -> Lead(x, jeffie))\n\nnot Lodge(karin, karin)\n\nLead(karin, coleman) and forall x (Lead(x, coleman) -> Lead(x, jeffie)) -> therefore Lead(karin, jeffie) Lead(karin, jeffie) and Lodge(karin, jeffie) and forall x (Lead(x, jeffie) and Lodge(x, jeffie) -> Lodge(x, karin)) -> therefore Lodge(karin, karin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The raoul is oiled. The raoul camp the conrad. The raoul lose the conrad. The raoul lose the rebekah. The conrad camp the raoul. The rebekah flog the raoul. The rebekah is utter. The rebekah is slashing. The franklyn flog the conrad. The franklyn camp the raoul. If someone is slashing then they like the conrad. If someone camp the franklyn then the franklyn camp the rebekah. If the franklyn lose the conrad and the conrad camp the franklyn then the conrad camp the raoul. If someone flog the raoul and they like the raoul then they like the franklyn. If the conrad flog the franklyn and the franklyn lose the rebekah then the franklyn is unflurried. If someone flog the conrad then they chase the raoul. The franklyn camp the rebekah.", "logic": "\nOiled(raoul)\nCamp(raoul, conrad)\nLose(raoul, conrad)\nLose(raoul, rebekah)\nCamp(conrad, raoul)\nFlog(rebekah, raoul)\nUtter(rebekah)\nSlashing(rebekah)\nFlog(franklyn, conrad)\nCamp(franklyn, raoul)\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Camp(x, conrad))\nforall x (Camp(x, franklyn) -> Camp(franklyn, rebekah))\nLose(franklyn, conrad) and Camp(conrad, franklyn) -> Camp(conrad, raoul)\nforall x (Flog(x, raoul) and Camp(x, raoul) -> Camp(x, franklyn))\nFlog(conrad, franklyn) and Lose(franklyn, rebekah) -> Unflurried(franklyn)\nforall x (Flog(x, conrad) -> Flog(x, raoul))\n\nCamp(franklyn, rebekah)\n\nFlog(franklyn, conrad) and forall x (Flog(x, conrad) -> Flog(x, raoul)) -> therefore Flog(franklyn, raoul) Flog(franklyn, raoul) and Camp(franklyn, raoul) and forall x (Flog(x, raoul) and Camp(x, raoul) -> Camp(x, franklyn)) -> therefore Camp(franklyn, franklyn) Camp(franklyn, franklyn) and forall x (Camp(x, franklyn) -> Camp(franklyn, rebekah)) -> therefore Camp(franklyn, rebekah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The wadsworth is offsides. The wadsworth assert the lex. The wadsworth bleat the lex. The wadsworth bleat the bealle. The lex assert the wadsworth. The bealle avoid the wadsworth. The bealle is mulish. The bealle is unexpected. The walt avoid the lex. The walt assert the wadsworth. If someone is unexpected then they like the lex. If someone assert the walt then the walt assert the bealle. If the walt bleat the lex and the lex assert the walt then the lex assert the wadsworth. If someone avoid the wadsworth and they like the wadsworth then they like the walt. If the lex avoid the walt and the walt bleat the bealle then the walt is treble. If someone avoid the lex then they chase the wadsworth. The walt does not like the bealle.", "logic": "\nOffsides(wadsworth)\nAssert(wadsworth, lex)\nBleat(wadsworth, lex)\nBleat(wadsworth, bealle)\nAssert(lex, wadsworth)\nAvoid(bealle, wadsworth)\nMulish(bealle)\nUnexpected(bealle)\nAvoid(walt, lex)\nAssert(walt, wadsworth)\nforall x (Unexpected(x) -> Assert(x, lex))\nforall x (Assert(x, walt) -> Assert(walt, bealle))\nBleat(walt, lex) and Assert(lex, walt) -> Assert(lex, wadsworth)\nforall x (Avoid(x, wadsworth) and Assert(x, wadsworth) -> Assert(x, walt))\nAvoid(lex, walt) and Bleat(walt, bealle) -> Treble(walt)\nforall x (Avoid(x, lex) -> Avoid(x, wadsworth))\n\nnot Assert(walt, bealle)\n\nAvoid(walt, lex) and forall x (Avoid(x, lex) -> Avoid(x, wadsworth)) -> therefore Avoid(walt, wadsworth) Avoid(walt, wadsworth) and Assert(walt, wadsworth) and forall x (Avoid(x, wadsworth) and Assert(x, wadsworth) -> Assert(x, walt)) -> therefore Assert(walt, walt) Assert(walt, walt) and forall x (Assert(x, walt) -> Assert(walt, bealle)) -> therefore Assert(walt, bealle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The malissia is acidic. The malissia depolarise the forrester. The malissia headbutt the forrester. The malissia headbutt the debbie. The forrester depolarise the malissia. The debbie nurse the malissia. The debbie is kitschy. The debbie is franciscan. The mora nurse the forrester. The mora depolarise the malissia. If someone is franciscan then they like the forrester. If someone depolarise the mora then the mora depolarise the debbie. If the mora headbutt the forrester and the forrester depolarise the mora then the forrester depolarise the malissia. If someone nurse the malissia and they like the malissia then they like the mora. If the forrester nurse the mora and the mora headbutt the debbie then the mora is lowest. If someone nurse the forrester then they chase the malissia. The mora is not lowest.", "logic": "\nAcidic(malissia)\nDepolarise(malissia, forrester)\nHeadbutt(malissia, forrester)\nHeadbutt(malissia, debbie)\nDepolarise(forrester, malissia)\nNurse(debbie, malissia)\nKitschy(debbie)\nFranciscan(debbie)\nNurse(mora, forrester)\nDepolarise(mora, malissia)\nforall x (Franciscan(x) -> Depolarise(x, forrester))\nforall x (Depolarise(x, mora) -> Depolarise(mora, debbie))\nHeadbutt(mora, forrester) and Depolarise(forrester, mora) -> Depolarise(forrester, malissia)\nforall x (Nurse(x, malissia) and Depolarise(x, malissia) -> Depolarise(x, mora))\nNurse(forrester, mora) and Headbutt(mora, debbie) -> Lowest(mora)\nforall x (Nurse(x, forrester) -> Nurse(x, malissia))\n\nnot Lowest(mora)\n\nNurse(forrester, mora) and Headbutt(mora, debbie) -> Lowest(mora) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The maggi is timorous. The maggi fuss the skip. The maggi surtax the skip. The maggi surtax the alida. The skip fuss the maggi. The alida underscore the maggi. The alida is executed. The alida is sidelong. The griswold underscore the skip. The griswold fuss the maggi. If someone is sidelong then they like the skip. If someone fuss the griswold then the griswold fuss the alida. If the griswold surtax the skip and the skip fuss the griswold then the skip fuss the maggi. If someone underscore the maggi and they like the maggi then they like the griswold. If the skip underscore the griswold and the griswold surtax the alida then the griswold is eupneic. If someone underscore the skip then they chase the maggi. The maggi fuss the griswold.", "logic": "\nTimorous(maggi)\nFuss(maggi, skip)\nSurtax(maggi, skip)\nSurtax(maggi, alida)\nFuss(skip, maggi)\nUnderscore(alida, maggi)\nExecuted(alida)\nSidelong(alida)\nUnderscore(griswold, skip)\nFuss(griswold, maggi)\nforall x (Sidelong(x) -> Fuss(x, skip))\nforall x (Fuss(x, griswold) -> Fuss(griswold, alida))\nSurtax(griswold, skip) and Fuss(skip, griswold) -> Fuss(skip, maggi)\nforall x (Underscore(x, maggi) and Fuss(x, maggi) -> Fuss(x, griswold))\nUnderscore(skip, griswold) and Surtax(griswold, alida) -> Eupneic(griswold)\nforall x (Underscore(x, skip) -> Underscore(x, maggi))\n\nFuss(maggi, griswold)\n\nforall x (Underscore(x, maggi) and Fuss(x, maggi) -> Fuss(x, griswold)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The rustin is unaware. The rustin misjudge the julita. The rustin reinstall the julita. The rustin reinstall the bonni. The julita misjudge the rustin. The bonni humanise the rustin. The bonni is precedent. The bonni is apostate. The micheal humanise the julita. The micheal misjudge the rustin. If someone is apostate then they like the julita. If someone misjudge the micheal then the micheal misjudge the bonni. If the micheal reinstall the julita and the julita misjudge the micheal then the julita misjudge the rustin. If someone humanise the rustin and they like the rustin then they like the micheal. If the julita humanise the micheal and the micheal reinstall the bonni then the micheal is bountiful. If someone humanise the julita then they chase the rustin. The julita does not chase the rustin.", "logic": "\nUnaware(rustin)\nMisjudge(rustin, julita)\nReinstall(rustin, julita)\nReinstall(rustin, bonni)\nMisjudge(julita, rustin)\nHumanise(bonni, rustin)\nPrecedent(bonni)\nApostate(bonni)\nHumanise(micheal, julita)\nMisjudge(micheal, rustin)\nforall x (Apostate(x) -> Misjudge(x, julita))\nforall x (Misjudge(x, micheal) -> Misjudge(micheal, bonni))\nReinstall(micheal, julita) and Misjudge(julita, micheal) -> Misjudge(julita, rustin)\nforall x (Humanise(x, rustin) and Misjudge(x, rustin) -> Misjudge(x, micheal))\nHumanise(julita, micheal) and Reinstall(micheal, bonni) -> Bountiful(micheal)\nforall x (Humanise(x, julita) -> Humanise(x, rustin))\n\nnot Humanise(julita, rustin)\n\nforall x (Humanise(x, julita) -> Humanise(x, rustin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The alvin is falconine. The alvin emaciate the dode. The alvin copyright the dode. The alvin copyright the jessika. The dode emaciate the alvin. The jessika digitise the alvin. The jessika is singable. The jessika is rackety. The cosetta digitise the dode. The cosetta emaciate the alvin. If someone is rackety then they like the dode. If someone emaciate the cosetta then the cosetta emaciate the jessika. If the cosetta copyright the dode and the dode emaciate the cosetta then the dode emaciate the alvin. If someone digitise the alvin and they like the alvin then they like the cosetta. If the dode digitise the cosetta and the cosetta copyright the jessika then the cosetta is hyperopic. If someone digitise the dode then they chase the alvin. The dode emaciate the cosetta.", "logic": "\nFalconine(alvin)\nEmaciate(alvin, dode)\nCopyright(alvin, dode)\nCopyright(alvin, jessika)\nEmaciate(dode, alvin)\nDigitise(jessika, alvin)\nSingable(jessika)\nRackety(jessika)\nDigitise(cosetta, dode)\nEmaciate(cosetta, alvin)\nforall x (Rackety(x) -> Emaciate(x, dode))\nforall x (Emaciate(x, cosetta) -> Emaciate(cosetta, jessika))\nCopyright(cosetta, dode) and Emaciate(dode, cosetta) -> Emaciate(dode, alvin)\nforall x (Digitise(x, alvin) and Emaciate(x, alvin) -> Emaciate(x, cosetta))\nDigitise(dode, cosetta) and Copyright(cosetta, jessika) -> Hyperopic(cosetta)\nforall x (Digitise(x, dode) -> Digitise(x, alvin))\n\nEmaciate(dode, cosetta)\n\nforall x (Digitise(x, alvin) and Emaciate(x, alvin) -> Emaciate(x, cosetta)) <- forall x (Digitise(x, dode) -> Digitise(x, alvin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The vincents is stormbound. The vincents undergird the seana. The vincents bore the seana. The vincents bore the kristin. The seana undergird the vincents. The kristin snipe the vincents. The kristin is forfeit. The kristin is endogamic. The gustavus snipe the seana. The gustavus undergird the vincents. If someone is endogamic then they like the seana. If someone undergird the gustavus then the gustavus undergird the kristin. If the gustavus bore the seana and the seana undergird the gustavus then the seana undergird the vincents. If someone snipe the vincents and they like the vincents then they like the gustavus. If the seana snipe the gustavus and the gustavus bore the kristin then the gustavus is uricosuric. If someone snipe the seana then they chase the vincents. The seana does not see the vincents.", "logic": "\nStormbound(vincents)\nUndergird(vincents, seana)\nBore(vincents, seana)\nBore(vincents, kristin)\nUndergird(seana, vincents)\nSnipe(kristin, vincents)\nForfeit(kristin)\nEndogamic(kristin)\nSnipe(gustavus, seana)\nUndergird(gustavus, vincents)\nforall x (Endogamic(x) -> Undergird(x, seana))\nforall x (Undergird(x, gustavus) -> Undergird(gustavus, kristin))\nBore(gustavus, seana) and Undergird(seana, gustavus) -> Undergird(seana, vincents)\nforall x (Snipe(x, vincents) and Undergird(x, vincents) -> Undergird(x, gustavus))\nSnipe(seana, gustavus) and Bore(gustavus, kristin) -> Uricosuric(gustavus)\nforall x (Snipe(x, seana) -> Snipe(x, vincents))\n\nnot Bore(seana, vincents)\n\nnot Bore(seana, vincents) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The errol is anginous. The errol resorb the mitch. The errol luff the mitch. The errol luff the laurent. The mitch resorb the errol. The laurent beleaguer the errol. The laurent is chaotic. The laurent is maladroit. The lissie beleaguer the mitch. The lissie resorb the errol. If someone is maladroit then they like the mitch. If someone resorb the lissie then the lissie resorb the laurent. If the lissie luff the mitch and the mitch resorb the lissie then the mitch resorb the errol. If someone beleaguer the errol and they like the errol then they like the lissie. If the mitch beleaguer the lissie and the lissie luff the laurent then the lissie is anadromous. If someone beleaguer the mitch then they chase the errol. The lissie is chaotic.", "logic": "\nAnginous(errol)\nResorb(errol, mitch)\nLuff(errol, mitch)\nLuff(errol, laurent)\nResorb(mitch, errol)\nBeleaguer(laurent, errol)\nChaotic(laurent)\nMaladroit(laurent)\nBeleaguer(lissie, mitch)\nResorb(lissie, errol)\nforall x (Maladroit(x) -> Resorb(x, mitch))\nforall x (Resorb(x, lissie) -> Resorb(lissie, laurent))\nLuff(lissie, mitch) and Resorb(mitch, lissie) -> Resorb(mitch, errol)\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, errol) and Resorb(x, errol) -> Resorb(x, lissie))\nBeleaguer(mitch, lissie) and Luff(lissie, laurent) -> Anadromous(lissie)\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, mitch) -> Beleaguer(x, errol))\n\nChaotic(lissie)\n\nChaotic(lissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The hamid is prosthetic. The hamid revamp the hollie. The hamid admire the hollie. The hamid admire the nichol. The hollie revamp the hamid. The nichol interdict the hamid. The nichol is predictive. The nichol is elderly. The clovis interdict the hollie. The clovis revamp the hamid. If someone is elderly then they like the hollie. If someone revamp the clovis then the clovis revamp the nichol. If the clovis admire the hollie and the hollie revamp the clovis then the hollie revamp the hamid. If someone interdict the hamid and they like the hamid then they like the clovis. If the hollie interdict the clovis and the clovis admire the nichol then the clovis is dionysian. If someone interdict the hollie then they chase the hamid. The hamid is not dionysian.", "logic": "\nProsthetic(hamid)\nRevamp(hamid, hollie)\nAdmire(hamid, hollie)\nAdmire(hamid, nichol)\nRevamp(hollie, hamid)\nInterdict(nichol, hamid)\nPredictive(nichol)\nElderly(nichol)\nInterdict(clovis, hollie)\nRevamp(clovis, hamid)\nforall x (Elderly(x) -> Revamp(x, hollie))\nforall x (Revamp(x, clovis) -> Revamp(clovis, nichol))\nAdmire(clovis, hollie) and Revamp(hollie, clovis) -> Revamp(hollie, hamid)\nforall x (Interdict(x, hamid) and Revamp(x, hamid) -> Revamp(x, clovis))\nInterdict(hollie, clovis) and Admire(clovis, nichol) -> Dionysian(clovis)\nforall x (Interdict(x, hollie) -> Interdict(x, hamid))\n\nnot Dionysian(hamid)\n\nnot Dionysian(hamid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The aram is canonised. The aram attach the ambrosio. The aram goofproof the ambrosio. The aram goofproof the jocelin. The ambrosio attach the aram. The jocelin aggress the aram. The jocelin is practiced. The jocelin is darkening. The alton aggress the ambrosio. The alton attach the aram. If someone is darkening then they like the ambrosio. If someone attach the alton then the alton attach the jocelin. If the alton goofproof the ambrosio and the ambrosio attach the alton then the ambrosio attach the aram. If someone aggress the aram and they like the aram then they like the alton. If the ambrosio aggress the alton and the alton goofproof the jocelin then the alton is rhodesian. If someone aggress the ambrosio then they chase the aram. The alton goofproof the jocelin.", "logic": "\nCanonised(aram)\nAttach(aram, ambrosio)\nGoofproof(aram, ambrosio)\nGoofproof(aram, jocelin)\nAttach(ambrosio, aram)\nAggress(jocelin, aram)\nPracticed(jocelin)\nDarkening(jocelin)\nAggress(alton, ambrosio)\nAttach(alton, aram)\nforall x (Darkening(x) -> Attach(x, ambrosio))\nforall x (Attach(x, alton) -> Attach(alton, jocelin))\nGoofproof(alton, ambrosio) and Attach(ambrosio, alton) -> Attach(ambrosio, aram)\nforall x (Aggress(x, aram) and Attach(x, aram) -> Attach(x, alton))\nAggress(ambrosio, alton) and Goofproof(alton, jocelin) -> Rhodesian(alton)\nforall x (Aggress(x, ambrosio) -> Aggress(x, aram))\n\nGoofproof(alton, jocelin)\n\nGoofproof(alton, jocelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "The zacherie is sequined. The zacherie backlog the clotilda. The zacherie backlog the torin. The zacherie fashion the clotilda. The zacherie devilize the clotilda. The zacherie devilize the torin. The clotilda is sequined. The clotilda backlog the zacherie. The clotilda backlog the torin. The clotilda does not need the zacherie. The clotilda devilize the torin. The torin is unraised. The torin is brotherly. The torin backlog the zacherie. The torin fashion the zacherie. If someone backlog the zacherie and the zacherie devilize the clotilda then they visit the clotilda. If someone devilize the clotilda and they are sequined then they visit the zacherie. The zacherie backlog the torin.", "logic": "\nSequined(zacherie)\nBacklog(zacherie, clotilda)\nBacklog(zacherie, torin)\nFashion(zacherie, clotilda)\nDevilize(zacherie, clotilda)\nDevilize(zacherie, torin)\nSequined(clotilda)\nBacklog(clotilda, zacherie)\nBacklog(clotilda, torin)\nnot Fashion(clotilda, zacherie)\nDevilize(clotilda, torin)\nUnraised(torin)\nBrotherly(torin)\nBacklog(torin, zacherie)\nFashion(torin, zacherie)\nforall x (Backlog(x, zacherie) and Devilize(zacherie, clotilda) -> Devilize(x, clotilda))\nforall x (Devilize(x, clotilda) and Sequined(x) -> Devilize(x, zacherie))\n\nBacklog(zacherie, torin)\n\ntherefore Backlog(zacherie, torin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The geraldine is liquified. The geraldine compile the elsa. The geraldine compile the lucille. The geraldine discompose the elsa. The geraldine legalize the elsa. The geraldine legalize the lucille. The elsa is liquified. The elsa compile the geraldine. The elsa compile the lucille. The elsa does not need the geraldine. The elsa legalize the lucille. The lucille is true. The lucille is raiseable. The lucille compile the geraldine. The lucille discompose the geraldine. If someone compile the geraldine and the geraldine legalize the elsa then they visit the elsa. If someone legalize the elsa and they are liquified then they visit the geraldine. The elsa does not like the geraldine.", "logic": "\nLiquified(geraldine)\nCompile(geraldine, elsa)\nCompile(geraldine, lucille)\nDiscompose(geraldine, elsa)\nLegalize(geraldine, elsa)\nLegalize(geraldine, lucille)\nLiquified(elsa)\nCompile(elsa, geraldine)\nCompile(elsa, lucille)\nnot Discompose(elsa, geraldine)\nLegalize(elsa, lucille)\nTrue(lucille)\nRaiseable(lucille)\nCompile(lucille, geraldine)\nDiscompose(lucille, geraldine)\nforall x (Compile(x, geraldine) and Legalize(geraldine, elsa) -> Legalize(x, elsa))\nforall x (Legalize(x, elsa) and Liquified(x) -> Legalize(x, geraldine))\n\nnot Compile(elsa, geraldine)\n\ntherefore Compile(elsa, geraldine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The emmi is unshorn. The emmi avert the deanne. The emmi avert the imojean. The emmi impute the deanne. The emmi dawdle the deanne. The emmi dawdle the imojean. The deanne is unshorn. The deanne avert the emmi. The deanne avert the imojean. The deanne does not need the emmi. The deanne dawdle the imojean. The imojean is edgy. The imojean is pleased. The imojean avert the emmi. The imojean impute the emmi. If someone avert the emmi and the emmi dawdle the deanne then they visit the deanne. If someone dawdle the deanne and they are unshorn then they visit the emmi. The imojean dawdle the deanne.", "logic": "\nUnshorn(emmi)\nAvert(emmi, deanne)\nAvert(emmi, imojean)\nImpute(emmi, deanne)\nDawdle(emmi, deanne)\nDawdle(emmi, imojean)\nUnshorn(deanne)\nAvert(deanne, emmi)\nAvert(deanne, imojean)\nnot Impute(deanne, emmi)\nDawdle(deanne, imojean)\nEdgy(imojean)\nPleased(imojean)\nAvert(imojean, emmi)\nImpute(imojean, emmi)\nforall x (Avert(x, emmi) and Dawdle(emmi, deanne) -> Dawdle(x, deanne))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, deanne) and Unshorn(x) -> Dawdle(x, emmi))\n\nDawdle(imojean, deanne)\n\nAvert(imojean, emmi) and Dawdle(emmi, deanne) and forall x (Avert(x, emmi) and Dawdle(emmi, deanne) -> Dawdle(x, deanne)) -> therefore Dawdle(imojean, deanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The grover is offshore. The grover ancylose the arabel. The grover ancylose the cybil. The grover depart the arabel. The grover rouse the arabel. The grover rouse the cybil. The arabel is offshore. The arabel ancylose the grover. The arabel ancylose the cybil. The arabel does not need the grover. The arabel rouse the cybil. The cybil is windy. The cybil is onshore. The cybil ancylose the grover. The cybil depart the grover. If someone ancylose the grover and the grover rouse the arabel then they visit the arabel. If someone rouse the arabel and they are offshore then they visit the grover. The cybil does not visit the arabel.", "logic": "\nOffshore(grover)\nAncylose(grover, arabel)\nAncylose(grover, cybil)\nDepart(grover, arabel)\nRouse(grover, arabel)\nRouse(grover, cybil)\nOffshore(arabel)\nAncylose(arabel, grover)\nAncylose(arabel, cybil)\nnot Depart(arabel, grover)\nRouse(arabel, cybil)\nWindy(cybil)\nOnshore(cybil)\nAncylose(cybil, grover)\nDepart(cybil, grover)\nforall x (Ancylose(x, grover) and Rouse(grover, arabel) -> Rouse(x, arabel))\nforall x (Rouse(x, arabel) and Offshore(x) -> Rouse(x, grover))\n\nnot Rouse(cybil, arabel)\n\nAncylose(cybil, grover) and Rouse(grover, arabel) and forall x (Ancylose(x, grover) and Rouse(grover, arabel) -> Rouse(x, arabel)) -> therefore Rouse(cybil, arabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The merlina is needled. The merlina clutter the susy. The merlina clutter the krystle. The merlina bore the susy. The merlina take the susy. The merlina take the krystle. The susy is needled. The susy clutter the merlina. The susy clutter the krystle. The susy does not need the merlina. The susy take the krystle. The krystle is mercerised. The krystle is mesial. The krystle clutter the merlina. The krystle bore the merlina. If someone clutter the merlina and the merlina take the susy then they visit the susy. If someone take the susy and they are needled then they visit the merlina. The susy take the merlina.", "logic": "\nNeedled(merlina)\nClutter(merlina, susy)\nClutter(merlina, krystle)\nBore(merlina, susy)\nTake(merlina, susy)\nTake(merlina, krystle)\nNeedled(susy)\nClutter(susy, merlina)\nClutter(susy, krystle)\nnot Bore(susy, merlina)\nTake(susy, krystle)\nMercerised(krystle)\nMesial(krystle)\nClutter(krystle, merlina)\nBore(krystle, merlina)\nforall x (Clutter(x, merlina) and Take(merlina, susy) -> Take(x, susy))\nforall x (Take(x, susy) and Needled(x) -> Take(x, merlina))\n\nTake(susy, merlina)\n\nClutter(susy, merlina) and Take(merlina, susy) and forall x (Clutter(x, merlina) and Take(merlina, susy) -> Take(x, susy)) -> therefore Take(susy, susy) Take(susy, susy) and Needled(susy) and forall x (Take(x, susy) and Needled(x) -> Take(x, merlina)) -> therefore Take(susy, merlina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The charlott is labial. The charlott pressure the leontine. The charlott pressure the tybi. The charlott lunge the leontine. The charlott canalize the leontine. The charlott canalize the tybi. The leontine is labial. The leontine pressure the charlott. The leontine pressure the tybi. The leontine does not need the charlott. The leontine canalize the tybi. The tybi is trilobate. The tybi is lightless. The tybi pressure the charlott. The tybi lunge the charlott. If someone pressure the charlott and the charlott canalize the leontine then they visit the leontine. If someone canalize the leontine and they are labial then they visit the charlott. The leontine does not visit the charlott.", "logic": "\nLabial(charlott)\nPressure(charlott, leontine)\nPressure(charlott, tybi)\nLunge(charlott, leontine)\nCanalize(charlott, leontine)\nCanalize(charlott, tybi)\nLabial(leontine)\nPressure(leontine, charlott)\nPressure(leontine, tybi)\nnot Lunge(leontine, charlott)\nCanalize(leontine, tybi)\nTrilobate(tybi)\nLightless(tybi)\nPressure(tybi, charlott)\nLunge(tybi, charlott)\nforall x (Pressure(x, charlott) and Canalize(charlott, leontine) -> Canalize(x, leontine))\nforall x (Canalize(x, leontine) and Labial(x) -> Canalize(x, charlott))\n\nnot Canalize(leontine, charlott)\n\nPressure(leontine, charlott) and Canalize(charlott, leontine) and forall x (Pressure(x, charlott) and Canalize(charlott, leontine) -> Canalize(x, leontine)) -> therefore Canalize(leontine, leontine) Canalize(leontine, leontine) and Labial(leontine) and forall x (Canalize(x, leontine) and Labial(x) -> Canalize(x, charlott)) -> therefore Canalize(leontine, charlott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The ezekiel is racial. The ezekiel chill the walsh. The ezekiel chill the jemmie. The ezekiel holiday the walsh. The ezekiel detect the walsh. The ezekiel detect the jemmie. The walsh is racial. The walsh chill the ezekiel. The walsh chill the jemmie. The walsh does not need the ezekiel. The walsh detect the jemmie. The jemmie is uninviting. The jemmie is recurved. The jemmie chill the ezekiel. The jemmie holiday the ezekiel. If someone chill the ezekiel and the ezekiel detect the walsh then they visit the walsh. If someone detect the walsh and they are racial then they visit the ezekiel. The jemmie does not visit the ezekiel.", "logic": "\nRacial(ezekiel)\nChill(ezekiel, walsh)\nChill(ezekiel, jemmie)\nHoliday(ezekiel, walsh)\nDetect(ezekiel, walsh)\nDetect(ezekiel, jemmie)\nRacial(walsh)\nChill(walsh, ezekiel)\nChill(walsh, jemmie)\nnot Holiday(walsh, ezekiel)\nDetect(walsh, jemmie)\nUninviting(jemmie)\nRecurved(jemmie)\nChill(jemmie, ezekiel)\nHoliday(jemmie, ezekiel)\nforall x (Chill(x, ezekiel) and Detect(ezekiel, walsh) -> Detect(x, walsh))\nforall x (Detect(x, walsh) and Racial(x) -> Detect(x, ezekiel))\n\nnot Detect(jemmie, ezekiel)\n\nforall x (Detect(x, walsh) and Racial(x) -> Detect(x, ezekiel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The morrie is interlaced. The morrie overpay the annalyse. The morrie overpay the minerva. The morrie overextend the annalyse. The morrie slither the annalyse. The morrie slither the minerva. The annalyse is interlaced. The annalyse overpay the morrie. The annalyse overpay the minerva. The annalyse does not need the morrie. The annalyse slither the minerva. The minerva is erythroid. The minerva is spoilt. The minerva overpay the morrie. The minerva overextend the morrie. If someone overpay the morrie and the morrie slither the annalyse then they visit the annalyse. If someone slither the annalyse and they are interlaced then they visit the morrie. The morrie is cold.", "logic": "\nInterlaced(morrie)\nOverpay(morrie, annalyse)\nOverpay(morrie, minerva)\nOverextend(morrie, annalyse)\nSlither(morrie, annalyse)\nSlither(morrie, minerva)\nInterlaced(annalyse)\nOverpay(annalyse, morrie)\nOverpay(annalyse, minerva)\nnot Overextend(annalyse, morrie)\nSlither(annalyse, minerva)\nErythroid(minerva)\nSpoilt(minerva)\nOverpay(minerva, morrie)\nOverextend(minerva, morrie)\nforall x (Overpay(x, morrie) and Slither(morrie, annalyse) -> Slither(x, annalyse))\nforall x (Slither(x, annalyse) and Interlaced(x) -> Slither(x, morrie))\n\nCold(morrie)\n\nCold(morrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The ariadne is hidebound. The ariadne lumber the donny. The ariadne lumber the fifine. The ariadne outguess the donny. The ariadne signpost the donny. The ariadne signpost the fifine. The donny is hidebound. The donny lumber the ariadne. The donny lumber the fifine. The donny does not need the ariadne. The donny signpost the fifine. The fifine is airless. The fifine is imbalanced. The fifine lumber the ariadne. The fifine outguess the ariadne. If someone lumber the ariadne and the ariadne signpost the donny then they visit the donny. If someone signpost the donny and they are hidebound then they visit the ariadne. The ariadne is not green.", "logic": "\nHidebound(ariadne)\nLumber(ariadne, donny)\nLumber(ariadne, fifine)\nOutguess(ariadne, donny)\nSignpost(ariadne, donny)\nSignpost(ariadne, fifine)\nHidebound(donny)\nLumber(donny, ariadne)\nLumber(donny, fifine)\nnot Outguess(donny, ariadne)\nSignpost(donny, fifine)\nAirless(fifine)\nImbalanced(fifine)\nLumber(fifine, ariadne)\nOutguess(fifine, ariadne)\nforall x (Lumber(x, ariadne) and Signpost(ariadne, donny) -> Signpost(x, donny))\nforall x (Signpost(x, donny) and Hidebound(x) -> Signpost(x, ariadne))\n\nnot Green(ariadne)\n\nnot Green(ariadne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The raf is molded. The raf glimmer the cathrin. The raf glimmer the edwina. The raf embank the cathrin. The raf demo the cathrin. The raf demo the edwina. The cathrin is molded. The cathrin glimmer the raf. The cathrin glimmer the edwina. The cathrin does not need the raf. The cathrin demo the edwina. The edwina is windup. The edwina is rheumatic. The edwina glimmer the raf. The edwina embank the raf. If someone glimmer the raf and the raf demo the cathrin then they visit the cathrin. If someone demo the cathrin and they are molded then they visit the raf. The edwina is green.", "logic": "\nMolded(raf)\nGlimmer(raf, cathrin)\nGlimmer(raf, edwina)\nEmbank(raf, cathrin)\nDemo(raf, cathrin)\nDemo(raf, edwina)\nMolded(cathrin)\nGlimmer(cathrin, raf)\nGlimmer(cathrin, edwina)\nnot Embank(cathrin, raf)\nDemo(cathrin, edwina)\nWindup(edwina)\nRheumatic(edwina)\nGlimmer(edwina, raf)\nEmbank(edwina, raf)\nforall x (Glimmer(x, raf) and Demo(raf, cathrin) -> Demo(x, cathrin))\nforall x (Demo(x, cathrin) and Molded(x) -> Demo(x, raf))\n\nGreen(edwina)\n\nGreen(edwina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The wakefield is anesthetic. The wakefield upchuck the jasmine. The wakefield upchuck the ulises. The wakefield coordinate the jasmine. The wakefield kill the jasmine. The wakefield kill the ulises. The jasmine is anesthetic. The jasmine upchuck the wakefield. The jasmine upchuck the ulises. The jasmine does not need the wakefield. The jasmine kill the ulises. The ulises is furious. The ulises is impeding. The ulises upchuck the wakefield. The ulises coordinate the wakefield. If someone upchuck the wakefield and the wakefield kill the jasmine then they visit the jasmine. If someone kill the jasmine and they are anesthetic then they visit the wakefield. The jasmine is not green.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(wakefield)\nUpchuck(wakefield, jasmine)\nUpchuck(wakefield, ulises)\nCoordinate(wakefield, jasmine)\nKill(wakefield, jasmine)\nKill(wakefield, ulises)\nAnesthetic(jasmine)\nUpchuck(jasmine, wakefield)\nUpchuck(jasmine, ulises)\nnot Coordinate(jasmine, wakefield)\nKill(jasmine, ulises)\nFurious(ulises)\nImpeding(ulises)\nUpchuck(ulises, wakefield)\nCoordinate(ulises, wakefield)\nforall x (Upchuck(x, wakefield) and Kill(wakefield, jasmine) -> Kill(x, jasmine))\nforall x (Kill(x, jasmine) and Anesthetic(x) -> Kill(x, wakefield))\n\nnot Green(jasmine)\n\nnot Green(jasmine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The yankee is perforated. The yankee ratchet the gabey. The yankee ratchet the jobi. The yankee dado the gabey. The yankee embargo the gabey. The yankee embargo the jobi. The gabey is perforated. The gabey ratchet the yankee. The gabey ratchet the jobi. The gabey does not need the yankee. The gabey embargo the jobi. The jobi is bungling. The jobi is matte. The jobi ratchet the yankee. The jobi dado the yankee. If someone ratchet the yankee and the yankee embargo the gabey then they visit the gabey. If someone embargo the gabey and they are perforated then they visit the yankee. The gabey is cold.", "logic": "\nPerforated(yankee)\nRatchet(yankee, gabey)\nRatchet(yankee, jobi)\nDado(yankee, gabey)\nEmbargo(yankee, gabey)\nEmbargo(yankee, jobi)\nPerforated(gabey)\nRatchet(gabey, yankee)\nRatchet(gabey, jobi)\nnot Dado(gabey, yankee)\nEmbargo(gabey, jobi)\nBungling(jobi)\nMatte(jobi)\nRatchet(jobi, yankee)\nDado(jobi, yankee)\nforall x (Ratchet(x, yankee) and Embargo(yankee, gabey) -> Embargo(x, gabey))\nforall x (Embargo(x, gabey) and Perforated(x) -> Embargo(x, yankee))\n\nCold(gabey)\n\nCold(gabey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2159"} {"premises": "The wilma is operant. The wilma clot the hector. The hector transect the wilma. The hector transect the linoel. The hector does not visit the wilma. The linoel is disdainful. The linoel transect the dexter. The linoel clot the wilma. The linoel clot the hector. The linoel clot the dexter. The dexter is luteal. The dexter paper the wilma. The dexter does not need the linoel. The dexter does not see the wilma. The dexter transect the linoel. The dexter clot the wilma. If something clot the dexter then it transect the wilma. If the dexter clot the wilma and the wilma clot the hector then the wilma paper the hector. If the linoel is disdainful and the linoel is healthy then the linoel does not see the wilma. If something clot the wilma and it transect the wilma then the wilma clot the dexter. If something is lowbrow and it transect the dexter then it is luteal. If something is lowbrow then it clot the linoel. If something transect the wilma and it clot the hector then the hector is not luteal. If the hector transect the wilma then the hector does not visit the wilma. The hector transect the wilma.", "logic": "\nOperant(wilma)\nClot(wilma, hector)\nTransect(hector, wilma)\nTransect(hector, linoel)\nnot Clot(hector, wilma)\nDisdainful(linoel)\nTransect(linoel, dexter)\nClot(linoel, wilma)\nClot(linoel, hector)\nClot(linoel, dexter)\nLuteal(dexter)\nPaper(dexter, wilma)\nnot Paper(dexter, linoel)\nnot Transect(dexter, wilma)\nTransect(dexter, linoel)\nClot(dexter, wilma)\nforall x (Clot(x, dexter) -> Transect(x, wilma))\nClot(dexter, wilma) and Clot(wilma, hector) -> Paper(wilma, hector)\nDisdainful(linoel) and Healthy(linoel) -> not Transect(linoel, wilma)\nforall x (Clot(x, wilma) and Transect(x, wilma) -> Clot(wilma, dexter))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) and Transect(x, dexter) -> Luteal(x))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Clot(x, linoel))\nforall x (Transect(x, wilma) and Clot(x, hector) -> not Luteal(hector))\nTransect(hector, wilma) -> not Clot(hector, wilma)\n\nTransect(hector, wilma)\n\ntherefore Transect(hector, wilma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The tarah is vesicant. The tarah retain the morrie. The morrie metricize the tarah. The morrie metricize the lise. The morrie does not visit the tarah. The lise is serbian. The lise metricize the nellie. The lise retain the tarah. The lise retain the morrie. The lise retain the nellie. The nellie is grapy. The nellie skirt the tarah. The nellie does not need the lise. The nellie does not see the tarah. The nellie metricize the lise. The nellie retain the tarah. If something retain the nellie then it metricize the tarah. If the nellie retain the tarah and the tarah retain the morrie then the tarah skirt the morrie. If the lise is serbian and the lise is allophonic then the lise does not see the tarah. If something retain the tarah and it metricize the tarah then the tarah retain the nellie. If something is adverse and it metricize the nellie then it is grapy. If something is adverse then it retain the lise. If something metricize the tarah and it retain the morrie then the morrie is not grapy. If the morrie metricize the tarah then the morrie does not visit the tarah. The nellie does not need the tarah.", "logic": "\nVesicant(tarah)\nRetain(tarah, morrie)\nMetricize(morrie, tarah)\nMetricize(morrie, lise)\nnot Retain(morrie, tarah)\nSerbian(lise)\nMetricize(lise, nellie)\nRetain(lise, tarah)\nRetain(lise, morrie)\nRetain(lise, nellie)\nGrapy(nellie)\nSkirt(nellie, tarah)\nnot Skirt(nellie, lise)\nnot Metricize(nellie, tarah)\nMetricize(nellie, lise)\nRetain(nellie, tarah)\nforall x (Retain(x, nellie) -> Metricize(x, tarah))\nRetain(nellie, tarah) and Retain(tarah, morrie) -> Skirt(tarah, morrie)\nSerbian(lise) and Allophonic(lise) -> not Metricize(lise, tarah)\nforall x (Retain(x, tarah) and Metricize(x, tarah) -> Retain(tarah, nellie))\nforall x (Adverse(x) and Metricize(x, nellie) -> Grapy(x))\nforall x (Adverse(x) -> Retain(x, lise))\nforall x (Metricize(x, tarah) and Retain(x, morrie) -> not Grapy(morrie))\nMetricize(morrie, tarah) -> not Retain(morrie, tarah)\n\nnot Skirt(nellie, tarah)\n\ntherefore Skirt(nellie, tarah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The udall is clamant. The udall bedevil the salomone. The salomone relax the udall. The salomone relax the shayla. The salomone does not visit the udall. The shayla is unseeded. The shayla relax the collin. The shayla bedevil the udall. The shayla bedevil the salomone. The shayla bedevil the collin. The collin is razorback. The collin pick the udall. The collin does not need the shayla. The collin does not see the udall. The collin relax the shayla. The collin bedevil the udall. If something bedevil the collin then it relax the udall. If the collin bedevil the udall and the udall bedevil the salomone then the udall pick the salomone. If the shayla is unseeded and the shayla is zoological then the shayla does not see the udall. If something bedevil the udall and it relax the udall then the udall bedevil the collin. If something is jungly and it relax the collin then it is razorback. If something is jungly then it bedevil the shayla. If something relax the udall and it bedevil the salomone then the salomone is not razorback. If the salomone relax the udall then the salomone does not visit the udall. The shayla relax the udall.", "logic": "\nClamant(udall)\nBedevil(udall, salomone)\nRelax(salomone, udall)\nRelax(salomone, shayla)\nnot Bedevil(salomone, udall)\nUnseeded(shayla)\nRelax(shayla, collin)\nBedevil(shayla, udall)\nBedevil(shayla, salomone)\nBedevil(shayla, collin)\nRazorback(collin)\nPick(collin, udall)\nnot Pick(collin, shayla)\nnot Relax(collin, udall)\nRelax(collin, shayla)\nBedevil(collin, udall)\nforall x (Bedevil(x, collin) -> Relax(x, udall))\nBedevil(collin, udall) and Bedevil(udall, salomone) -> Pick(udall, salomone)\nUnseeded(shayla) and Zoological(shayla) -> not Relax(shayla, udall)\nforall x (Bedevil(x, udall) and Relax(x, udall) -> Bedevil(udall, collin))\nforall x (Jungly(x) and Relax(x, collin) -> Razorback(x))\nforall x (Jungly(x) -> Bedevil(x, shayla))\nforall x (Relax(x, udall) and Bedevil(x, salomone) -> not Razorback(salomone))\nRelax(salomone, udall) -> not Bedevil(salomone, udall)\n\nRelax(shayla, udall)\n\nBedevil(shayla, collin) and forall x (Bedevil(x, collin) -> Relax(x, udall)) -> therefore Relax(shayla, udall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The clancy is greensick. The clancy ignore the sioux. The sioux chill the clancy. The sioux chill the elwood. The sioux does not visit the clancy. The elwood is teentsy. The elwood chill the kaitlyn. The elwood ignore the clancy. The elwood ignore the sioux. The elwood ignore the kaitlyn. The kaitlyn is netted. The kaitlyn swap the clancy. The kaitlyn does not need the elwood. The kaitlyn does not see the clancy. The kaitlyn chill the elwood. The kaitlyn ignore the clancy. If something ignore the kaitlyn then it chill the clancy. If the kaitlyn ignore the clancy and the clancy ignore the sioux then the clancy swap the sioux. If the elwood is teentsy and the elwood is sightless then the elwood does not see the clancy. If something ignore the clancy and it chill the clancy then the clancy ignore the kaitlyn. If something is manx and it chill the kaitlyn then it is netted. If something is manx then it ignore the elwood. If something chill the clancy and it ignore the sioux then the sioux is not netted. If the sioux chill the clancy then the sioux does not visit the clancy. The elwood does not see the clancy.", "logic": "\nGreensick(clancy)\nIgnore(clancy, sioux)\nChill(sioux, clancy)\nChill(sioux, elwood)\nnot Ignore(sioux, clancy)\nTeentsy(elwood)\nChill(elwood, kaitlyn)\nIgnore(elwood, clancy)\nIgnore(elwood, sioux)\nIgnore(elwood, kaitlyn)\nNetted(kaitlyn)\nSwap(kaitlyn, clancy)\nnot Swap(kaitlyn, elwood)\nnot Chill(kaitlyn, clancy)\nChill(kaitlyn, elwood)\nIgnore(kaitlyn, clancy)\nforall x (Ignore(x, kaitlyn) -> Chill(x, clancy))\nIgnore(kaitlyn, clancy) and Ignore(clancy, sioux) -> Swap(clancy, sioux)\nTeentsy(elwood) and Sightless(elwood) -> not Chill(elwood, clancy)\nforall x (Ignore(x, clancy) and Chill(x, clancy) -> Ignore(clancy, kaitlyn))\nforall x (Manx(x) and Chill(x, kaitlyn) -> Netted(x))\nforall x (Manx(x) -> Ignore(x, elwood))\nforall x (Chill(x, clancy) and Ignore(x, sioux) -> not Netted(sioux))\nChill(sioux, clancy) -> not Ignore(sioux, clancy)\n\nnot Chill(elwood, clancy)\n\nIgnore(elwood, kaitlyn) and forall x (Ignore(x, kaitlyn) -> Chill(x, clancy)) -> therefore Chill(elwood, clancy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The izak is voiceless. The izak agonise the neddie. The neddie rafter the izak. The neddie rafter the essie. The neddie does not visit the izak. The essie is untaxed. The essie rafter the jay. The essie agonise the izak. The essie agonise the neddie. The essie agonise the jay. The jay is katabolic. The jay summer the izak. The jay does not need the essie. The jay does not see the izak. The jay rafter the essie. The jay agonise the izak. If something agonise the jay then it rafter the izak. If the jay agonise the izak and the izak agonise the neddie then the izak summer the neddie. If the essie is untaxed and the essie is aureate then the essie does not see the izak. If something agonise the izak and it rafter the izak then the izak agonise the jay. If something is undutiful and it rafter the jay then it is katabolic. If something is undutiful then it agonise the essie. If something rafter the izak and it agonise the neddie then the neddie is not katabolic. If the neddie rafter the izak then the neddie does not visit the izak. The neddie is not katabolic.", "logic": "\nVoiceless(izak)\nAgonise(izak, neddie)\nRafter(neddie, izak)\nRafter(neddie, essie)\nnot Agonise(neddie, izak)\nUntaxed(essie)\nRafter(essie, jay)\nAgonise(essie, izak)\nAgonise(essie, neddie)\nAgonise(essie, jay)\nKatabolic(jay)\nSummer(jay, izak)\nnot Summer(jay, essie)\nnot Rafter(jay, izak)\nRafter(jay, essie)\nAgonise(jay, izak)\nforall x (Agonise(x, jay) -> Rafter(x, izak))\nAgonise(jay, izak) and Agonise(izak, neddie) -> Summer(izak, neddie)\nUntaxed(essie) and Aureate(essie) -> not Rafter(essie, izak)\nforall x (Agonise(x, izak) and Rafter(x, izak) -> Agonise(izak, jay))\nforall x (Undutiful(x) and Rafter(x, jay) -> Katabolic(x))\nforall x (Undutiful(x) -> Agonise(x, essie))\nforall x (Rafter(x, izak) and Agonise(x, neddie) -> not Katabolic(neddie))\nRafter(neddie, izak) -> not Agonise(neddie, izak)\n\nnot Katabolic(neddie)\n\nAgonise(essie, jay) and forall x (Agonise(x, jay) -> Rafter(x, izak)) -> therefore Rafter(essie, izak) Rafter(essie, izak) and Agonise(essie, neddie) and forall x (Rafter(x, izak) and Agonise(x, neddie) -> not Katabolic(neddie)) -> therefore not Katabolic(neddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The rodney is funky. The rodney daze the joy. The joy finalize the rodney. The joy finalize the fiorenze. The joy does not visit the rodney. The fiorenze is cased. The fiorenze finalize the miranda. The fiorenze daze the rodney. The fiorenze daze the joy. The fiorenze daze the miranda. The miranda is sopranino. The miranda acclimate the rodney. The miranda does not need the fiorenze. The miranda does not see the rodney. The miranda finalize the fiorenze. The miranda daze the rodney. If something daze the miranda then it finalize the rodney. If the miranda daze the rodney and the rodney daze the joy then the rodney acclimate the joy. If the fiorenze is cased and the fiorenze is peaceful then the fiorenze does not see the rodney. If something daze the rodney and it finalize the rodney then the rodney daze the miranda. If something is cycloidal and it finalize the miranda then it is sopranino. If something is cycloidal then it daze the fiorenze. If something finalize the rodney and it daze the joy then the joy is not sopranino. If the joy finalize the rodney then the joy does not visit the rodney. The rodney does not visit the miranda.", "logic": "\nFunky(rodney)\nDaze(rodney, joy)\nFinalize(joy, rodney)\nFinalize(joy, fiorenze)\nnot Daze(joy, rodney)\nCased(fiorenze)\nFinalize(fiorenze, miranda)\nDaze(fiorenze, rodney)\nDaze(fiorenze, joy)\nDaze(fiorenze, miranda)\nSopranino(miranda)\nAcclimate(miranda, rodney)\nnot Acclimate(miranda, fiorenze)\nnot Finalize(miranda, rodney)\nFinalize(miranda, fiorenze)\nDaze(miranda, rodney)\nforall x (Daze(x, miranda) -> Finalize(x, rodney))\nDaze(miranda, rodney) and Daze(rodney, joy) -> Acclimate(rodney, joy)\nCased(fiorenze) and Peaceful(fiorenze) -> not Finalize(fiorenze, rodney)\nforall x (Daze(x, rodney) and Finalize(x, rodney) -> Daze(rodney, miranda))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) and Finalize(x, miranda) -> Sopranino(x))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) -> Daze(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Finalize(x, rodney) and Daze(x, joy) -> not Sopranino(joy))\nFinalize(joy, rodney) -> not Daze(joy, rodney)\n\nnot Daze(rodney, miranda)\n\nDaze(fiorenze, miranda) and forall x (Daze(x, miranda) -> Finalize(x, rodney)) -> therefore Finalize(fiorenze, rodney) Daze(fiorenze, rodney) and Finalize(fiorenze, rodney) and forall x (Daze(x, rodney) and Finalize(x, rodney) -> Daze(rodney, miranda)) -> therefore Daze(rodney, miranda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The sib is honorific. The sib portray the luciano. The luciano specialise the sib. The luciano specialise the candie. The luciano does not visit the sib. The candie is abstemious. The candie specialise the nitin. The candie portray the sib. The candie portray the luciano. The candie portray the nitin. The nitin is waiting. The nitin toggle the sib. The nitin does not need the candie. The nitin does not see the sib. The nitin specialise the candie. The nitin portray the sib. If something portray the nitin then it specialise the sib. If the nitin portray the sib and the sib portray the luciano then the sib toggle the luciano. If the candie is abstemious and the candie is haemal then the candie does not see the sib. If something portray the sib and it specialise the sib then the sib portray the nitin. If something is lemonlike and it specialise the nitin then it is waiting. If something is lemonlike then it portray the candie. If something specialise the sib and it portray the luciano then the luciano is not waiting. If the luciano specialise the sib then the luciano does not visit the sib. The sib specialise the sib.", "logic": "\nHonorific(sib)\nPortray(sib, luciano)\nSpecialise(luciano, sib)\nSpecialise(luciano, candie)\nnot Portray(luciano, sib)\nAbstemious(candie)\nSpecialise(candie, nitin)\nPortray(candie, sib)\nPortray(candie, luciano)\nPortray(candie, nitin)\nWaiting(nitin)\nToggle(nitin, sib)\nnot Toggle(nitin, candie)\nnot Specialise(nitin, sib)\nSpecialise(nitin, candie)\nPortray(nitin, sib)\nforall x (Portray(x, nitin) -> Specialise(x, sib))\nPortray(nitin, sib) and Portray(sib, luciano) -> Toggle(sib, luciano)\nAbstemious(candie) and Haemal(candie) -> not Specialise(candie, sib)\nforall x (Portray(x, sib) and Specialise(x, sib) -> Portray(sib, nitin))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) and Specialise(x, nitin) -> Waiting(x))\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) -> Portray(x, candie))\nforall x (Specialise(x, sib) and Portray(x, luciano) -> not Waiting(luciano))\nSpecialise(luciano, sib) -> not Portray(luciano, sib)\n\nSpecialise(sib, sib)\n\nPortray(candie, nitin) and forall x (Portray(x, nitin) -> Specialise(x, sib)) -> therefore Specialise(candie, sib) Portray(candie, sib) and Specialise(candie, sib) and forall x (Portray(x, sib) and Specialise(x, sib) -> Portray(sib, nitin)) -> therefore Portray(sib, nitin) Portray(sib, nitin) and forall x (Portray(x, nitin) -> Specialise(x, sib)) -> therefore Specialise(sib, sib)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The vivyanne is iridaceous. The vivyanne extricate the cloris. The cloris roughen the vivyanne. The cloris roughen the ilise. The cloris does not visit the vivyanne. The ilise is biddable. The ilise roughen the tomkin. The ilise extricate the vivyanne. The ilise extricate the cloris. The ilise extricate the tomkin. The tomkin is remittent. The tomkin muzzle the vivyanne. The tomkin does not need the ilise. The tomkin does not see the vivyanne. The tomkin roughen the ilise. The tomkin extricate the vivyanne. If something extricate the tomkin then it roughen the vivyanne. If the tomkin extricate the vivyanne and the vivyanne extricate the cloris then the vivyanne muzzle the cloris. If the ilise is biddable and the ilise is rolling then the ilise does not see the vivyanne. If something extricate the vivyanne and it roughen the vivyanne then the vivyanne extricate the tomkin. If something is recurvate and it roughen the tomkin then it is remittent. If something is recurvate then it extricate the ilise. If something roughen the vivyanne and it extricate the cloris then the cloris is not remittent. If the cloris roughen the vivyanne then the cloris does not visit the vivyanne. The vivyanne does not see the vivyanne.", "logic": "\nIridaceous(vivyanne)\nExtricate(vivyanne, cloris)\nRoughen(cloris, vivyanne)\nRoughen(cloris, ilise)\nnot Extricate(cloris, vivyanne)\nBiddable(ilise)\nRoughen(ilise, tomkin)\nExtricate(ilise, vivyanne)\nExtricate(ilise, cloris)\nExtricate(ilise, tomkin)\nRemittent(tomkin)\nMuzzle(tomkin, vivyanne)\nnot Muzzle(tomkin, ilise)\nnot Roughen(tomkin, vivyanne)\nRoughen(tomkin, ilise)\nExtricate(tomkin, vivyanne)\nforall x (Extricate(x, tomkin) -> Roughen(x, vivyanne))\nExtricate(tomkin, vivyanne) and Extricate(vivyanne, cloris) -> Muzzle(vivyanne, cloris)\nBiddable(ilise) and Rolling(ilise) -> not Roughen(ilise, vivyanne)\nforall x (Extricate(x, vivyanne) and Roughen(x, vivyanne) -> Extricate(vivyanne, tomkin))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and Roughen(x, tomkin) -> Remittent(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) -> Extricate(x, ilise))\nforall x (Roughen(x, vivyanne) and Extricate(x, cloris) -> not Remittent(cloris))\nRoughen(cloris, vivyanne) -> not Extricate(cloris, vivyanne)\n\nnot Roughen(vivyanne, vivyanne)\n\nExtricate(ilise, tomkin) and forall x (Extricate(x, tomkin) -> Roughen(x, vivyanne)) -> therefore Roughen(ilise, vivyanne) Extricate(ilise, vivyanne) and Roughen(ilise, vivyanne) and forall x (Extricate(x, vivyanne) and Roughen(x, vivyanne) -> Extricate(vivyanne, tomkin)) -> therefore Extricate(vivyanne, tomkin) Extricate(vivyanne, tomkin) and forall x (Extricate(x, tomkin) -> Roughen(x, vivyanne)) -> therefore Roughen(vivyanne, vivyanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The yance is absorbing. The yance reproduce the kelsy. The kelsy determine the yance. The kelsy determine the zeb. The kelsy does not visit the yance. The zeb is unerring. The zeb determine the kristen. The zeb reproduce the yance. The zeb reproduce the kelsy. The zeb reproduce the kristen. The kristen is euphonious. The kristen lather the yance. The kristen does not need the zeb. The kristen does not see the yance. The kristen determine the zeb. The kristen reproduce the yance. If something reproduce the kristen then it determine the yance. If the kristen reproduce the yance and the yance reproduce the kelsy then the yance lather the kelsy. If the zeb is unerring and the zeb is hygienic then the zeb does not see the yance. If something reproduce the yance and it determine the yance then the yance reproduce the kristen. If something is aerolitic and it determine the kristen then it is euphonious. If something is aerolitic then it reproduce the zeb. If something determine the yance and it reproduce the kelsy then the kelsy is not euphonious. If the kelsy determine the yance then the kelsy does not visit the yance. The kelsy does not visit the zeb.", "logic": "\nAbsorbing(yance)\nReproduce(yance, kelsy)\nDetermine(kelsy, yance)\nDetermine(kelsy, zeb)\nnot Reproduce(kelsy, yance)\nUnerring(zeb)\nDetermine(zeb, kristen)\nReproduce(zeb, yance)\nReproduce(zeb, kelsy)\nReproduce(zeb, kristen)\nEuphonious(kristen)\nLather(kristen, yance)\nnot Lather(kristen, zeb)\nnot Determine(kristen, yance)\nDetermine(kristen, zeb)\nReproduce(kristen, yance)\nforall x (Reproduce(x, kristen) -> Determine(x, yance))\nReproduce(kristen, yance) and Reproduce(yance, kelsy) -> Lather(yance, kelsy)\nUnerring(zeb) and Hygienic(zeb) -> not Determine(zeb, yance)\nforall x (Reproduce(x, yance) and Determine(x, yance) -> Reproduce(yance, kristen))\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) and Determine(x, kristen) -> Euphonious(x))\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Reproduce(x, zeb))\nforall x (Determine(x, yance) and Reproduce(x, kelsy) -> not Euphonious(kelsy))\nDetermine(kelsy, yance) -> not Reproduce(kelsy, yance)\n\nnot Reproduce(kelsy, zeb)\n\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Reproduce(x, zeb)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The zeke is eery. The zeke summon the amberly. The amberly solidify the zeke. The amberly solidify the heywood. The amberly does not visit the zeke. The heywood is debauched. The heywood solidify the rocky. The heywood summon the zeke. The heywood summon the amberly. The heywood summon the rocky. The rocky is taking. The rocky twitch the zeke. The rocky does not need the heywood. The rocky does not see the zeke. The rocky solidify the heywood. The rocky summon the zeke. If something summon the rocky then it solidify the zeke. If the rocky summon the zeke and the zeke summon the amberly then the zeke twitch the amberly. If the heywood is debauched and the heywood is marketable then the heywood does not see the zeke. If something summon the zeke and it solidify the zeke then the zeke summon the rocky. If something is dented and it solidify the rocky then it is taking. If something is dented then it summon the heywood. If something solidify the zeke and it summon the amberly then the amberly is not taking. If the amberly solidify the zeke then the amberly does not visit the zeke. The heywood is taking.", "logic": "\nEery(zeke)\nSummon(zeke, amberly)\nSolidify(amberly, zeke)\nSolidify(amberly, heywood)\nnot Summon(amberly, zeke)\nDebauched(heywood)\nSolidify(heywood, rocky)\nSummon(heywood, zeke)\nSummon(heywood, amberly)\nSummon(heywood, rocky)\nTaking(rocky)\nTwitch(rocky, zeke)\nnot Twitch(rocky, heywood)\nnot Solidify(rocky, zeke)\nSolidify(rocky, heywood)\nSummon(rocky, zeke)\nforall x (Summon(x, rocky) -> Solidify(x, zeke))\nSummon(rocky, zeke) and Summon(zeke, amberly) -> Twitch(zeke, amberly)\nDebauched(heywood) and Marketable(heywood) -> not Solidify(heywood, zeke)\nforall x (Summon(x, zeke) and Solidify(x, zeke) -> Summon(zeke, rocky))\nforall x (Dented(x) and Solidify(x, rocky) -> Taking(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Summon(x, heywood))\nforall x (Solidify(x, zeke) and Summon(x, amberly) -> not Taking(amberly))\nSolidify(amberly, zeke) -> not Summon(amberly, zeke)\n\nTaking(heywood)\n\nforall x (Dented(x) and Solidify(x, rocky) -> Taking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The judie is fireproof. The judie thrill the catriona. The catriona agonize the judie. The catriona agonize the glad. The catriona does not visit the judie. The glad is fearsome. The glad agonize the frans. The glad thrill the judie. The glad thrill the catriona. The glad thrill the frans. The frans is sedgelike. The frans hike the judie. The frans does not need the glad. The frans does not see the judie. The frans agonize the glad. The frans thrill the judie. If something thrill the frans then it agonize the judie. If the frans thrill the judie and the judie thrill the catriona then the judie hike the catriona. If the glad is fearsome and the glad is demode then the glad does not see the judie. If something thrill the judie and it agonize the judie then the judie thrill the frans. If something is femoral and it agonize the frans then it is sedgelike. If something is femoral then it thrill the glad. If something agonize the judie and it thrill the catriona then the catriona is not sedgelike. If the catriona agonize the judie then the catriona does not visit the judie. The judie is not sedgelike.", "logic": "\nFireproof(judie)\nThrill(judie, catriona)\nAgonize(catriona, judie)\nAgonize(catriona, glad)\nnot Thrill(catriona, judie)\nFearsome(glad)\nAgonize(glad, frans)\nThrill(glad, judie)\nThrill(glad, catriona)\nThrill(glad, frans)\nSedgelike(frans)\nHike(frans, judie)\nnot Hike(frans, glad)\nnot Agonize(frans, judie)\nAgonize(frans, glad)\nThrill(frans, judie)\nforall x (Thrill(x, frans) -> Agonize(x, judie))\nThrill(frans, judie) and Thrill(judie, catriona) -> Hike(judie, catriona)\nFearsome(glad) and Demode(glad) -> not Agonize(glad, judie)\nforall x (Thrill(x, judie) and Agonize(x, judie) -> Thrill(judie, frans))\nforall x (Femoral(x) and Agonize(x, frans) -> Sedgelike(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Thrill(x, glad))\nforall x (Agonize(x, judie) and Thrill(x, catriona) -> not Sedgelike(catriona))\nAgonize(catriona, judie) -> not Thrill(catriona, judie)\n\nnot Sedgelike(judie)\n\nforall x (Femoral(x) and Agonize(x, frans) -> Sedgelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The nidia is iodised. The nidia prophesy the adeline. The adeline calibrate the nidia. The adeline calibrate the davine. The adeline does not visit the nidia. The davine is magnetic. The davine calibrate the olivier. The davine prophesy the nidia. The davine prophesy the adeline. The davine prophesy the olivier. The olivier is definable. The olivier milk the nidia. The olivier does not need the davine. The olivier does not see the nidia. The olivier calibrate the davine. The olivier prophesy the nidia. If something prophesy the olivier then it calibrate the nidia. If the olivier prophesy the nidia and the nidia prophesy the adeline then the nidia milk the adeline. If the davine is magnetic and the davine is unequipped then the davine does not see the nidia. If something prophesy the nidia and it calibrate the nidia then the nidia prophesy the olivier. If something is blubbery and it calibrate the olivier then it is definable. If something is blubbery then it prophesy the davine. If something calibrate the nidia and it prophesy the adeline then the adeline is not definable. If the adeline calibrate the nidia then the adeline does not visit the nidia. The davine prophesy the davine.", "logic": "\nIodised(nidia)\nProphesy(nidia, adeline)\nCalibrate(adeline, nidia)\nCalibrate(adeline, davine)\nnot Prophesy(adeline, nidia)\nMagnetic(davine)\nCalibrate(davine, olivier)\nProphesy(davine, nidia)\nProphesy(davine, adeline)\nProphesy(davine, olivier)\nDefinable(olivier)\nMilk(olivier, nidia)\nnot Milk(olivier, davine)\nnot Calibrate(olivier, nidia)\nCalibrate(olivier, davine)\nProphesy(olivier, nidia)\nforall x (Prophesy(x, olivier) -> Calibrate(x, nidia))\nProphesy(olivier, nidia) and Prophesy(nidia, adeline) -> Milk(nidia, adeline)\nMagnetic(davine) and Unequipped(davine) -> not Calibrate(davine, nidia)\nforall x (Prophesy(x, nidia) and Calibrate(x, nidia) -> Prophesy(nidia, olivier))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) and Calibrate(x, olivier) -> Definable(x))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Prophesy(x, davine))\nforall x (Calibrate(x, nidia) and Prophesy(x, adeline) -> not Definable(adeline))\nCalibrate(adeline, nidia) -> not Prophesy(adeline, nidia)\n\nProphesy(davine, davine)\n\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Prophesy(x, davine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The shamit is delicious. The shamit localize the carin. The carin inhabit the shamit. The carin inhabit the corinne. The carin does not visit the shamit. The corinne is bellyless. The corinne inhabit the rozamond. The corinne localize the shamit. The corinne localize the carin. The corinne localize the rozamond. The rozamond is cyprinoid. The rozamond allow the shamit. The rozamond does not need the corinne. The rozamond does not see the shamit. The rozamond inhabit the corinne. The rozamond localize the shamit. If something localize the rozamond then it inhabit the shamit. If the rozamond localize the shamit and the shamit localize the carin then the shamit allow the carin. If the corinne is bellyless and the corinne is lossy then the corinne does not see the shamit. If something localize the shamit and it inhabit the shamit then the shamit localize the rozamond. If something is tabu and it inhabit the rozamond then it is cyprinoid. If something is tabu then it localize the corinne. If something inhabit the shamit and it localize the carin then the carin is not cyprinoid. If the carin inhabit the shamit then the carin does not visit the shamit. The carin is not tabu.", "logic": "\nDelicious(shamit)\nLocalize(shamit, carin)\nInhabit(carin, shamit)\nInhabit(carin, corinne)\nnot Localize(carin, shamit)\nBellyless(corinne)\nInhabit(corinne, rozamond)\nLocalize(corinne, shamit)\nLocalize(corinne, carin)\nLocalize(corinne, rozamond)\nCyprinoid(rozamond)\nAllow(rozamond, shamit)\nnot Allow(rozamond, corinne)\nnot Inhabit(rozamond, shamit)\nInhabit(rozamond, corinne)\nLocalize(rozamond, shamit)\nforall x (Localize(x, rozamond) -> Inhabit(x, shamit))\nLocalize(rozamond, shamit) and Localize(shamit, carin) -> Allow(shamit, carin)\nBellyless(corinne) and Lossy(corinne) -> not Inhabit(corinne, shamit)\nforall x (Localize(x, shamit) and Inhabit(x, shamit) -> Localize(shamit, rozamond))\nforall x (Tabu(x) and Inhabit(x, rozamond) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Tabu(x) -> Localize(x, corinne))\nforall x (Inhabit(x, shamit) and Localize(x, carin) -> not Cyprinoid(carin))\nInhabit(carin, shamit) -> not Localize(carin, shamit)\n\nnot Tabu(carin)\n\nnot Tabu(carin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The grove is queasy. The grove relax the gray. The gray cuddle the grove. The gray cuddle the bryan. The gray does not visit the grove. The bryan is permanent. The bryan cuddle the viva. The bryan relax the grove. The bryan relax the gray. The bryan relax the viva. The viva is windless. The viva league the grove. The viva does not need the bryan. The viva does not see the grove. The viva cuddle the bryan. The viva relax the grove. If something relax the viva then it cuddle the grove. If the viva relax the grove and the grove relax the gray then the grove league the gray. If the bryan is permanent and the bryan is smoothed then the bryan does not see the grove. If something relax the grove and it cuddle the grove then the grove relax the viva. If something is muscovite and it cuddle the viva then it is windless. If something is muscovite then it relax the bryan. If something cuddle the grove and it relax the gray then the gray is not windless. If the gray cuddle the grove then the gray does not visit the grove. The bryan cuddle the gray.", "logic": "\nQueasy(grove)\nRelax(grove, gray)\nCuddle(gray, grove)\nCuddle(gray, bryan)\nnot Relax(gray, grove)\nPermanent(bryan)\nCuddle(bryan, viva)\nRelax(bryan, grove)\nRelax(bryan, gray)\nRelax(bryan, viva)\nWindless(viva)\nLeague(viva, grove)\nnot League(viva, bryan)\nnot Cuddle(viva, grove)\nCuddle(viva, bryan)\nRelax(viva, grove)\nforall x (Relax(x, viva) -> Cuddle(x, grove))\nRelax(viva, grove) and Relax(grove, gray) -> League(grove, gray)\nPermanent(bryan) and Smoothed(bryan) -> not Cuddle(bryan, grove)\nforall x (Relax(x, grove) and Cuddle(x, grove) -> Relax(grove, viva))\nforall x (Muscovite(x) and Cuddle(x, viva) -> Windless(x))\nforall x (Muscovite(x) -> Relax(x, bryan))\nforall x (Cuddle(x, grove) and Relax(x, gray) -> not Windless(gray))\nCuddle(gray, grove) -> not Relax(gray, grove)\n\nCuddle(bryan, gray)\n\nCuddle(bryan, gray) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The timmy is pearly. The timmy stipple the crystie. The crystie contour the timmy. The crystie contour the cordy. The crystie does not visit the timmy. The cordy is reinforced. The cordy contour the evaleen. The cordy stipple the timmy. The cordy stipple the crystie. The cordy stipple the evaleen. The evaleen is danceable. The evaleen beard the timmy. The evaleen does not need the cordy. The evaleen does not see the timmy. The evaleen contour the cordy. The evaleen stipple the timmy. If something stipple the evaleen then it contour the timmy. If the evaleen stipple the timmy and the timmy stipple the crystie then the timmy beard the crystie. If the cordy is reinforced and the cordy is deviant then the cordy does not see the timmy. If something stipple the timmy and it contour the timmy then the timmy stipple the evaleen. If something is smoky and it contour the evaleen then it is danceable. If something is smoky then it stipple the cordy. If something contour the timmy and it stipple the crystie then the crystie is not danceable. If the crystie contour the timmy then the crystie does not visit the timmy. The timmy is not smoky.", "logic": "\nPearly(timmy)\nStipple(timmy, crystie)\nContour(crystie, timmy)\nContour(crystie, cordy)\nnot Stipple(crystie, timmy)\nReinforced(cordy)\nContour(cordy, evaleen)\nStipple(cordy, timmy)\nStipple(cordy, crystie)\nStipple(cordy, evaleen)\nDanceable(evaleen)\nBeard(evaleen, timmy)\nnot Beard(evaleen, cordy)\nnot Contour(evaleen, timmy)\nContour(evaleen, cordy)\nStipple(evaleen, timmy)\nforall x (Stipple(x, evaleen) -> Contour(x, timmy))\nStipple(evaleen, timmy) and Stipple(timmy, crystie) -> Beard(timmy, crystie)\nReinforced(cordy) and Deviant(cordy) -> not Contour(cordy, timmy)\nforall x (Stipple(x, timmy) and Contour(x, timmy) -> Stipple(timmy, evaleen))\nforall x (Smoky(x) and Contour(x, evaleen) -> Danceable(x))\nforall x (Smoky(x) -> Stipple(x, cordy))\nforall x (Contour(x, timmy) and Stipple(x, crystie) -> not Danceable(crystie))\nContour(crystie, timmy) -> not Stipple(crystie, timmy)\n\nnot Smoky(timmy)\n\nnot Smoky(timmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The antonetta is honeylike. The antonetta disforest the nitin. The nitin excogitate the antonetta. The nitin excogitate the lorie. The nitin does not visit the antonetta. The lorie is jungian. The lorie excogitate the trey. The lorie disforest the antonetta. The lorie disforest the nitin. The lorie disforest the trey. The trey is tempting. The trey flog the antonetta. The trey does not need the lorie. The trey does not see the antonetta. The trey excogitate the lorie. The trey disforest the antonetta. If something disforest the trey then it excogitate the antonetta. If the trey disforest the antonetta and the antonetta disforest the nitin then the antonetta flog the nitin. If the lorie is jungian and the lorie is careful then the lorie does not see the antonetta. If something disforest the antonetta and it excogitate the antonetta then the antonetta disforest the trey. If something is paroxysmal and it excogitate the trey then it is tempting. If something is paroxysmal then it disforest the lorie. If something excogitate the antonetta and it disforest the nitin then the nitin is not tempting. If the nitin excogitate the antonetta then the nitin does not visit the antonetta. The lorie flog the trey.", "logic": "\nHoneylike(antonetta)\nDisforest(antonetta, nitin)\nExcogitate(nitin, antonetta)\nExcogitate(nitin, lorie)\nnot Disforest(nitin, antonetta)\nJungian(lorie)\nExcogitate(lorie, trey)\nDisforest(lorie, antonetta)\nDisforest(lorie, nitin)\nDisforest(lorie, trey)\nTempting(trey)\nFlog(trey, antonetta)\nnot Flog(trey, lorie)\nnot Excogitate(trey, antonetta)\nExcogitate(trey, lorie)\nDisforest(trey, antonetta)\nforall x (Disforest(x, trey) -> Excogitate(x, antonetta))\nDisforest(trey, antonetta) and Disforest(antonetta, nitin) -> Flog(antonetta, nitin)\nJungian(lorie) and Careful(lorie) -> not Excogitate(lorie, antonetta)\nforall x (Disforest(x, antonetta) and Excogitate(x, antonetta) -> Disforest(antonetta, trey))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) and Excogitate(x, trey) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Paroxysmal(x) -> Disforest(x, lorie))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, antonetta) and Disforest(x, nitin) -> not Tempting(nitin))\nExcogitate(nitin, antonetta) -> not Disforest(nitin, antonetta)\n\nFlog(lorie, trey)\n\nFlog(lorie, trey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-656"} {"premises": "The dedie deice the stephine. The dedie enfeeble the stephine. The shelby is fourteen. The shelby is pathogenic. The shelby scupper the stephine. The stephine deice the shelby. The stephine deice the adrianna. The stephine is apish. The stephine is inherited. The stephine is pathogenic. The adrianna is apish. The adrianna is pathogenic. The adrianna enfeeble the stephine. The adrianna scupper the dedie. The adrianna scupper the stephine. If someone is inherited and they eat the dedie then they are fourteen. If the dedie is fourteen then the dedie scupper the shelby. If someone deice the adrianna and they visit the shelby then the adrianna deice the stephine. If someone deice the stephine and the stephine enfeeble the shelby then the shelby deice the adrianna. If someone scupper the dedie and the dedie deice the shelby then the dedie is pathogenic. If someone is pathogenic then they visit the adrianna. If someone is snuffly and they eat the adrianna then the adrianna is snuffly. If someone scupper the adrianna then they eat the dedie. The adrianna is pathogenic.", "logic": "\nDeice(dedie, stephine)\nEnfeeble(dedie, stephine)\nFourteen(shelby)\nPathogenic(shelby)\nScupper(shelby, stephine)\nDeice(stephine, shelby)\nDeice(stephine, adrianna)\nApish(stephine)\nInherited(stephine)\nPathogenic(stephine)\nApish(adrianna)\nPathogenic(adrianna)\nEnfeeble(adrianna, stephine)\nScupper(adrianna, dedie)\nScupper(adrianna, stephine)\nforall x (Inherited(x) and Deice(x, dedie) -> Fourteen(x))\nFourteen(dedie) -> Scupper(dedie, shelby)\nforall x (Deice(x, adrianna) and Scupper(x, shelby) -> Deice(adrianna, stephine))\nforall x (Deice(x, stephine) and Enfeeble(stephine, shelby) -> Deice(shelby, adrianna))\nforall x (Scupper(x, dedie) and Deice(dedie, shelby) -> Pathogenic(dedie))\nforall x (Pathogenic(x) -> Scupper(x, adrianna))\nforall x (Snuffly(x) and Deice(x, adrianna) -> Snuffly(adrianna))\nforall x (Scupper(x, adrianna) -> Deice(x, dedie))\n\nPathogenic(adrianna)\n\ntherefore Pathogenic(adrianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The phoebe unscramble the tully. The phoebe vocalize the tully. The lolita is iodinating. The lolita is acerose. The lolita bellyache the tully. The tully unscramble the lolita. The tully unscramble the katusha. The tully is fisheye. The tully is geodetic. The tully is acerose. The katusha is fisheye. The katusha is acerose. The katusha vocalize the tully. The katusha bellyache the phoebe. The katusha bellyache the tully. If someone is geodetic and they eat the phoebe then they are iodinating. If the phoebe is iodinating then the phoebe bellyache the lolita. If someone unscramble the katusha and they visit the lolita then the katusha unscramble the tully. If someone unscramble the tully and the tully vocalize the lolita then the lolita unscramble the katusha. If someone bellyache the phoebe and the phoebe unscramble the lolita then the phoebe is acerose. If someone is acerose then they visit the katusha. If someone is horrible and they eat the katusha then the katusha is horrible. If someone bellyache the katusha then they eat the phoebe. The katusha does not see the tully.", "logic": "\nUnscramble(phoebe, tully)\nVocalize(phoebe, tully)\nIodinating(lolita)\nAcerose(lolita)\nBellyache(lolita, tully)\nUnscramble(tully, lolita)\nUnscramble(tully, katusha)\nFisheye(tully)\nGeodetic(tully)\nAcerose(tully)\nFisheye(katusha)\nAcerose(katusha)\nVocalize(katusha, tully)\nBellyache(katusha, phoebe)\nBellyache(katusha, tully)\nforall x (Geodetic(x) and Unscramble(x, phoebe) -> Iodinating(x))\nIodinating(phoebe) -> Bellyache(phoebe, lolita)\nforall x (Unscramble(x, katusha) and Bellyache(x, lolita) -> Unscramble(katusha, tully))\nforall x (Unscramble(x, tully) and Vocalize(tully, lolita) -> Unscramble(lolita, katusha))\nforall x (Bellyache(x, phoebe) and Unscramble(phoebe, lolita) -> Acerose(phoebe))\nforall x (Acerose(x) -> Bellyache(x, katusha))\nforall x (Horrible(x) and Unscramble(x, katusha) -> Horrible(katusha))\nforall x (Bellyache(x, katusha) -> Unscramble(x, phoebe))\n\nnot Vocalize(katusha, tully)\n\ntherefore Vocalize(katusha, tully)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The gilburt devour the imojean. The gilburt tittivate the imojean. The newton is onside. The newton is katabolic. The newton eulogise the imojean. The imojean devour the newton. The imojean devour the armando. The imojean is flemish. The imojean is fatherlike. The imojean is katabolic. The armando is flemish. The armando is katabolic. The armando tittivate the imojean. The armando eulogise the gilburt. The armando eulogise the imojean. If someone is fatherlike and they eat the gilburt then they are onside. If the gilburt is onside then the gilburt eulogise the newton. If someone devour the armando and they visit the newton then the armando devour the imojean. If someone devour the imojean and the imojean tittivate the newton then the newton devour the armando. If someone eulogise the gilburt and the gilburt devour the newton then the gilburt is katabolic. If someone is katabolic then they visit the armando. If someone is brimful and they eat the armando then the armando is brimful. If someone eulogise the armando then they eat the gilburt. The newton eulogise the armando.", "logic": "\nDevour(gilburt, imojean)\nTittivate(gilburt, imojean)\nOnside(newton)\nKatabolic(newton)\nEulogise(newton, imojean)\nDevour(imojean, newton)\nDevour(imojean, armando)\nFlemish(imojean)\nFatherlike(imojean)\nKatabolic(imojean)\nFlemish(armando)\nKatabolic(armando)\nTittivate(armando, imojean)\nEulogise(armando, gilburt)\nEulogise(armando, imojean)\nforall x (Fatherlike(x) and Devour(x, gilburt) -> Onside(x))\nOnside(gilburt) -> Eulogise(gilburt, newton)\nforall x (Devour(x, armando) and Eulogise(x, newton) -> Devour(armando, imojean))\nforall x (Devour(x, imojean) and Tittivate(imojean, newton) -> Devour(newton, armando))\nforall x (Eulogise(x, gilburt) and Devour(gilburt, newton) -> Katabolic(gilburt))\nforall x (Katabolic(x) -> Eulogise(x, armando))\nforall x (Brimful(x) and Devour(x, armando) -> Brimful(armando))\nforall x (Eulogise(x, armando) -> Devour(x, gilburt))\n\nEulogise(newton, armando)\n\nKatabolic(newton) and forall x (Katabolic(x) -> Eulogise(x, armando)) -> therefore Eulogise(newton, armando)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The leeanne guillotine the garvey. The leeanne scull the garvey. The tucky is wideband. The tucky is conventual. The tucky shamanise the garvey. The garvey guillotine the tucky. The garvey guillotine the julius. The garvey is binaural. The garvey is debonnaire. The garvey is conventual. The julius is binaural. The julius is conventual. The julius scull the garvey. The julius shamanise the leeanne. The julius shamanise the garvey. If someone is debonnaire and they eat the leeanne then they are wideband. If the leeanne is wideband then the leeanne shamanise the tucky. If someone guillotine the julius and they visit the tucky then the julius guillotine the garvey. If someone guillotine the garvey and the garvey scull the tucky then the tucky guillotine the julius. If someone shamanise the leeanne and the leeanne guillotine the tucky then the leeanne is conventual. If someone is conventual then they visit the julius. If someone is uveous and they eat the julius then the julius is uveous. If someone shamanise the julius then they eat the leeanne. The julius does not visit the julius.", "logic": "\nGuillotine(leeanne, garvey)\nScull(leeanne, garvey)\nWideband(tucky)\nConventual(tucky)\nShamanise(tucky, garvey)\nGuillotine(garvey, tucky)\nGuillotine(garvey, julius)\nBinaural(garvey)\nDebonnaire(garvey)\nConventual(garvey)\nBinaural(julius)\nConventual(julius)\nScull(julius, garvey)\nShamanise(julius, leeanne)\nShamanise(julius, garvey)\nforall x (Debonnaire(x) and Guillotine(x, leeanne) -> Wideband(x))\nWideband(leeanne) -> Shamanise(leeanne, tucky)\nforall x (Guillotine(x, julius) and Shamanise(x, tucky) -> Guillotine(julius, garvey))\nforall x (Guillotine(x, garvey) and Scull(garvey, tucky) -> Guillotine(tucky, julius))\nforall x (Shamanise(x, leeanne) and Guillotine(leeanne, tucky) -> Conventual(leeanne))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Shamanise(x, julius))\nforall x (Uveous(x) and Guillotine(x, julius) -> Uveous(julius))\nforall x (Shamanise(x, julius) -> Guillotine(x, leeanne))\n\nnot Shamanise(julius, julius)\n\nConventual(julius) and forall x (Conventual(x) -> Shamanise(x, julius)) -> therefore Shamanise(julius, julius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The joellyn totalize the prudy. The joellyn char the prudy. The lanette is ordinal. The lanette is laughing. The lanette scavenge the prudy. The prudy totalize the lanette. The prudy totalize the brigitta. The prudy is ignescent. The prudy is xliii. The prudy is laughing. The brigitta is ignescent. The brigitta is laughing. The brigitta char the prudy. The brigitta scavenge the joellyn. The brigitta scavenge the prudy. If someone is xliii and they eat the joellyn then they are ordinal. If the joellyn is ordinal then the joellyn scavenge the lanette. If someone totalize the brigitta and they visit the lanette then the brigitta totalize the prudy. If someone totalize the prudy and the prudy char the lanette then the lanette totalize the brigitta. If someone scavenge the joellyn and the joellyn totalize the lanette then the joellyn is laughing. If someone is laughing then they visit the brigitta. If someone is terminal and they eat the brigitta then the brigitta is terminal. If someone scavenge the brigitta then they eat the joellyn. The lanette totalize the joellyn.", "logic": "\nTotalize(joellyn, prudy)\nChar(joellyn, prudy)\nOrdinal(lanette)\nLaughing(lanette)\nScavenge(lanette, prudy)\nTotalize(prudy, lanette)\nTotalize(prudy, brigitta)\nIgnescent(prudy)\nXliii(prudy)\nLaughing(prudy)\nIgnescent(brigitta)\nLaughing(brigitta)\nChar(brigitta, prudy)\nScavenge(brigitta, joellyn)\nScavenge(brigitta, prudy)\nforall x (Xliii(x) and Totalize(x, joellyn) -> Ordinal(x))\nOrdinal(joellyn) -> Scavenge(joellyn, lanette)\nforall x (Totalize(x, brigitta) and Scavenge(x, lanette) -> Totalize(brigitta, prudy))\nforall x (Totalize(x, prudy) and Char(prudy, lanette) -> Totalize(lanette, brigitta))\nforall x (Scavenge(x, joellyn) and Totalize(joellyn, lanette) -> Laughing(joellyn))\nforall x (Laughing(x) -> Scavenge(x, brigitta))\nforall x (Terminal(x) and Totalize(x, brigitta) -> Terminal(brigitta))\nforall x (Scavenge(x, brigitta) -> Totalize(x, joellyn))\n\nTotalize(lanette, joellyn)\n\nLaughing(lanette) and forall x (Laughing(x) -> Scavenge(x, brigitta)) -> therefore Scavenge(lanette, brigitta) Scavenge(lanette, brigitta) and forall x (Scavenge(x, brigitta) -> Totalize(x, joellyn)) -> therefore Totalize(lanette, joellyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The templeton rime the stormy. The templeton maximize the stormy. The kory is agnostical. The kory is beardless. The kory park the stormy. The stormy rime the kory. The stormy rime the osborn. The stormy is sanctioned. The stormy is inheriting. The stormy is beardless. The osborn is sanctioned. The osborn is beardless. The osborn maximize the stormy. The osborn park the templeton. The osborn park the stormy. If someone is inheriting and they eat the templeton then they are agnostical. If the templeton is agnostical then the templeton park the kory. If someone rime the osborn and they visit the kory then the osborn rime the stormy. If someone rime the stormy and the stormy maximize the kory then the kory rime the osborn. If someone park the templeton and the templeton rime the kory then the templeton is beardless. If someone is beardless then they visit the osborn. If someone is softish and they eat the osborn then the osborn is softish. If someone park the osborn then they eat the templeton. The kory does not eat the templeton.", "logic": "\nRime(templeton, stormy)\nMaximize(templeton, stormy)\nAgnostical(kory)\nBeardless(kory)\nPark(kory, stormy)\nRime(stormy, kory)\nRime(stormy, osborn)\nSanctioned(stormy)\nInheriting(stormy)\nBeardless(stormy)\nSanctioned(osborn)\nBeardless(osborn)\nMaximize(osborn, stormy)\nPark(osborn, templeton)\nPark(osborn, stormy)\nforall x (Inheriting(x) and Rime(x, templeton) -> Agnostical(x))\nAgnostical(templeton) -> Park(templeton, kory)\nforall x (Rime(x, osborn) and Park(x, kory) -> Rime(osborn, stormy))\nforall x (Rime(x, stormy) and Maximize(stormy, kory) -> Rime(kory, osborn))\nforall x (Park(x, templeton) and Rime(templeton, kory) -> Beardless(templeton))\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Park(x, osborn))\nforall x (Softish(x) and Rime(x, osborn) -> Softish(osborn))\nforall x (Park(x, osborn) -> Rime(x, templeton))\n\nnot Rime(kory, templeton)\n\nBeardless(kory) and forall x (Beardless(x) -> Park(x, osborn)) -> therefore Park(kory, osborn) Park(kory, osborn) and forall x (Park(x, osborn) -> Rime(x, templeton)) -> therefore Rime(kory, templeton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The michaela germinate the carol. The michaela engross the carol. The brenda is poetical. The brenda is littered. The brenda diverge the carol. The carol germinate the brenda. The carol germinate the becca. The carol is ruthful. The carol is unmovable. The carol is littered. The becca is ruthful. The becca is littered. The becca engross the carol. The becca diverge the michaela. The becca diverge the carol. If someone is unmovable and they eat the michaela then they are poetical. If the michaela is poetical then the michaela diverge the brenda. If someone germinate the becca and they visit the brenda then the becca germinate the carol. If someone germinate the carol and the carol engross the brenda then the brenda germinate the becca. If someone diverge the michaela and the michaela germinate the brenda then the michaela is littered. If someone is littered then they visit the becca. If someone is overmuch and they eat the becca then the becca is overmuch. If someone diverge the becca then they eat the michaela. The carol is poetical.", "logic": "\nGerminate(michaela, carol)\nEngross(michaela, carol)\nPoetical(brenda)\nLittered(brenda)\nDiverge(brenda, carol)\nGerminate(carol, brenda)\nGerminate(carol, becca)\nRuthful(carol)\nUnmovable(carol)\nLittered(carol)\nRuthful(becca)\nLittered(becca)\nEngross(becca, carol)\nDiverge(becca, michaela)\nDiverge(becca, carol)\nforall x (Unmovable(x) and Germinate(x, michaela) -> Poetical(x))\nPoetical(michaela) -> Diverge(michaela, brenda)\nforall x (Germinate(x, becca) and Diverge(x, brenda) -> Germinate(becca, carol))\nforall x (Germinate(x, carol) and Engross(carol, brenda) -> Germinate(brenda, becca))\nforall x (Diverge(x, michaela) and Germinate(michaela, brenda) -> Littered(michaela))\nforall x (Littered(x) -> Diverge(x, becca))\nforall x (Overmuch(x) and Germinate(x, becca) -> Overmuch(becca))\nforall x (Diverge(x, becca) -> Germinate(x, michaela))\n\nPoetical(carol)\n\nLittered(carol) and forall x (Littered(x) -> Diverge(x, becca)) -> therefore Diverge(carol, becca) Diverge(carol, becca) and forall x (Diverge(x, becca) -> Germinate(x, michaela)) -> therefore Germinate(carol, michaela) Unmovable(carol) and Germinate(carol, michaela) and forall x (Unmovable(x) and Germinate(x, michaela) -> Poetical(x)) -> therefore Poetical(carol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The kimbra globalise the dustin. The kimbra putter the dustin. The valina is andean. The valina is germanic. The valina house the dustin. The dustin globalise the valina. The dustin globalise the nikoletta. The dustin is pinioned. The dustin is calced. The dustin is germanic. The nikoletta is pinioned. The nikoletta is germanic. The nikoletta putter the dustin. The nikoletta house the kimbra. The nikoletta house the dustin. If someone is calced and they eat the kimbra then they are andean. If the kimbra is andean then the kimbra house the valina. If someone globalise the nikoletta and they visit the valina then the nikoletta globalise the dustin. If someone globalise the dustin and the dustin putter the valina then the valina globalise the nikoletta. If someone house the kimbra and the kimbra globalise the valina then the kimbra is germanic. If someone is germanic then they visit the nikoletta. If someone is echoless and they eat the nikoletta then the nikoletta is echoless. If someone house the nikoletta then they eat the kimbra. The dustin is not andean.", "logic": "\nGlobalise(kimbra, dustin)\nPutter(kimbra, dustin)\nAndean(valina)\nGermanic(valina)\nHouse(valina, dustin)\nGlobalise(dustin, valina)\nGlobalise(dustin, nikoletta)\nPinioned(dustin)\nCalced(dustin)\nGermanic(dustin)\nPinioned(nikoletta)\nGermanic(nikoletta)\nPutter(nikoletta, dustin)\nHouse(nikoletta, kimbra)\nHouse(nikoletta, dustin)\nforall x (Calced(x) and Globalise(x, kimbra) -> Andean(x))\nAndean(kimbra) -> House(kimbra, valina)\nforall x (Globalise(x, nikoletta) and House(x, valina) -> Globalise(nikoletta, dustin))\nforall x (Globalise(x, dustin) and Putter(dustin, valina) -> Globalise(valina, nikoletta))\nforall x (House(x, kimbra) and Globalise(kimbra, valina) -> Germanic(kimbra))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> House(x, nikoletta))\nforall x (Echoless(x) and Globalise(x, nikoletta) -> Echoless(nikoletta))\nforall x (House(x, nikoletta) -> Globalise(x, kimbra))\n\nnot Andean(dustin)\n\nGermanic(dustin) and forall x (Germanic(x) -> House(x, nikoletta)) -> therefore House(dustin, nikoletta) House(dustin, nikoletta) and forall x (House(x, nikoletta) -> Globalise(x, kimbra)) -> therefore Globalise(dustin, kimbra) Calced(dustin) and Globalise(dustin, kimbra) and forall x (Calced(x) and Globalise(x, kimbra) -> Andean(x)) -> therefore Andean(dustin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The simonette steamer the edin. The simonette block the edin. The scott is downstairs. The scott is guarded. The scott wound the edin. The edin steamer the scott. The edin steamer the lionel. The edin is queenly. The edin is deniable. The edin is guarded. The lionel is queenly. The lionel is guarded. The lionel block the edin. The lionel wound the simonette. The lionel wound the edin. If someone is deniable and they eat the simonette then they are downstairs. If the simonette is downstairs then the simonette wound the scott. If someone steamer the lionel and they visit the scott then the lionel steamer the edin. If someone steamer the edin and the edin block the scott then the scott steamer the lionel. If someone wound the simonette and the simonette steamer the scott then the simonette is guarded. If someone is guarded then they visit the lionel. If someone is aweary and they eat the lionel then the lionel is aweary. If someone wound the lionel then they eat the simonette. The simonette does not visit the scott.", "logic": "\nSteamer(simonette, edin)\nBlock(simonette, edin)\nDownstairs(scott)\nGuarded(scott)\nWound(scott, edin)\nSteamer(edin, scott)\nSteamer(edin, lionel)\nQueenly(edin)\nDeniable(edin)\nGuarded(edin)\nQueenly(lionel)\nGuarded(lionel)\nBlock(lionel, edin)\nWound(lionel, simonette)\nWound(lionel, edin)\nforall x (Deniable(x) and Steamer(x, simonette) -> Downstairs(x))\nDownstairs(simonette) -> Wound(simonette, scott)\nforall x (Steamer(x, lionel) and Wound(x, scott) -> Steamer(lionel, edin))\nforall x (Steamer(x, edin) and Block(edin, scott) -> Steamer(scott, lionel))\nforall x (Wound(x, simonette) and Steamer(simonette, scott) -> Guarded(simonette))\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Wound(x, lionel))\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Steamer(x, lionel) -> Aweary(lionel))\nforall x (Wound(x, lionel) -> Steamer(x, simonette))\n\nnot Wound(simonette, scott)\n\nDownstairs(simonette) -> Wound(simonette, scott) <- forall x (Deniable(x) and Steamer(x, simonette) -> Downstairs(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The viola shoot the maddie. The viola suspire the maddie. The minta is revokable. The minta is arrant. The minta invoice the maddie. The maddie shoot the minta. The maddie shoot the melodee. The maddie is volunteer. The maddie is subsurface. The maddie is arrant. The melodee is volunteer. The melodee is arrant. The melodee suspire the maddie. The melodee invoice the viola. The melodee invoice the maddie. If someone is subsurface and they eat the viola then they are revokable. If the viola is revokable then the viola invoice the minta. If someone shoot the melodee and they visit the minta then the melodee shoot the maddie. If someone shoot the maddie and the maddie suspire the minta then the minta shoot the melodee. If someone invoice the viola and the viola shoot the minta then the viola is arrant. If someone is arrant then they visit the melodee. If someone is caroline and they eat the melodee then the melodee is caroline. If someone invoice the melodee then they eat the viola. The melodee is revokable.", "logic": "\nShoot(viola, maddie)\nSuspire(viola, maddie)\nRevokable(minta)\nArrant(minta)\nInvoice(minta, maddie)\nShoot(maddie, minta)\nShoot(maddie, melodee)\nVolunteer(maddie)\nSubsurface(maddie)\nArrant(maddie)\nVolunteer(melodee)\nArrant(melodee)\nSuspire(melodee, maddie)\nInvoice(melodee, viola)\nInvoice(melodee, maddie)\nforall x (Subsurface(x) and Shoot(x, viola) -> Revokable(x))\nRevokable(viola) -> Invoice(viola, minta)\nforall x (Shoot(x, melodee) and Invoice(x, minta) -> Shoot(melodee, maddie))\nforall x (Shoot(x, maddie) and Suspire(maddie, minta) -> Shoot(minta, melodee))\nforall x (Invoice(x, viola) and Shoot(viola, minta) -> Arrant(viola))\nforall x (Arrant(x) -> Invoice(x, melodee))\nforall x (Caroline(x) and Shoot(x, melodee) -> Caroline(melodee))\nforall x (Invoice(x, melodee) -> Shoot(x, viola))\n\nRevokable(melodee)\n\nforall x (Subsurface(x) and Shoot(x, viola) -> Revokable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The idette caucus the vivian. The idette backbite the vivian. The lauretta is analyzed. The lauretta is unpaid. The lauretta angle the vivian. The vivian caucus the lauretta. The vivian caucus the vernon. The vivian is analeptic. The vivian is directive. The vivian is unpaid. The vernon is analeptic. The vernon is unpaid. The vernon backbite the vivian. The vernon angle the idette. The vernon angle the vivian. If someone is directive and they eat the idette then they are analyzed. If the idette is analyzed then the idette angle the lauretta. If someone caucus the vernon and they visit the lauretta then the vernon caucus the vivian. If someone caucus the vivian and the vivian backbite the lauretta then the lauretta caucus the vernon. If someone angle the idette and the idette caucus the lauretta then the idette is unpaid. If someone is unpaid then they visit the vernon. If someone is pampering and they eat the vernon then the vernon is pampering. If someone angle the vernon then they eat the idette. The idette does not visit the vernon.", "logic": "\nCaucus(idette, vivian)\nBackbite(idette, vivian)\nAnalyzed(lauretta)\nUnpaid(lauretta)\nAngle(lauretta, vivian)\nCaucus(vivian, lauretta)\nCaucus(vivian, vernon)\nAnaleptic(vivian)\nDirective(vivian)\nUnpaid(vivian)\nAnaleptic(vernon)\nUnpaid(vernon)\nBackbite(vernon, vivian)\nAngle(vernon, idette)\nAngle(vernon, vivian)\nforall x (Directive(x) and Caucus(x, idette) -> Analyzed(x))\nAnalyzed(idette) -> Angle(idette, lauretta)\nforall x (Caucus(x, vernon) and Angle(x, lauretta) -> Caucus(vernon, vivian))\nforall x (Caucus(x, vivian) and Backbite(vivian, lauretta) -> Caucus(lauretta, vernon))\nforall x (Angle(x, idette) and Caucus(idette, lauretta) -> Unpaid(idette))\nforall x (Unpaid(x) -> Angle(x, vernon))\nforall x (Pampering(x) and Caucus(x, vernon) -> Pampering(vernon))\nforall x (Angle(x, vernon) -> Caucus(x, idette))\n\nnot Angle(idette, vernon)\n\nforall x (Unpaid(x) -> Angle(x, vernon)) <- forall x (Angle(x, idette) and Caucus(idette, lauretta) -> Unpaid(idette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The patrick evangelize the jacenta. The patrick photostat the jacenta. The othello is panicky. The othello is spavined. The othello weightlift the jacenta. The jacenta evangelize the othello. The jacenta evangelize the elaine. The jacenta is envious. The jacenta is hectic. The jacenta is spavined. The elaine is envious. The elaine is spavined. The elaine photostat the jacenta. The elaine weightlift the patrick. The elaine weightlift the jacenta. If someone is hectic and they eat the patrick then they are panicky. If the patrick is panicky then the patrick weightlift the othello. If someone evangelize the elaine and they visit the othello then the elaine evangelize the jacenta. If someone evangelize the jacenta and the jacenta photostat the othello then the othello evangelize the elaine. If someone weightlift the patrick and the patrick evangelize the othello then the patrick is spavined. If someone is spavined then they visit the elaine. If someone is shrubby and they eat the elaine then the elaine is shrubby. If someone weightlift the elaine then they eat the patrick. The elaine is shrubby.", "logic": "\nEvangelize(patrick, jacenta)\nPhotostat(patrick, jacenta)\nPanicky(othello)\nSpavined(othello)\nWeightlift(othello, jacenta)\nEvangelize(jacenta, othello)\nEvangelize(jacenta, elaine)\nEnvious(jacenta)\nHectic(jacenta)\nSpavined(jacenta)\nEnvious(elaine)\nSpavined(elaine)\nPhotostat(elaine, jacenta)\nWeightlift(elaine, patrick)\nWeightlift(elaine, jacenta)\nforall x (Hectic(x) and Evangelize(x, patrick) -> Panicky(x))\nPanicky(patrick) -> Weightlift(patrick, othello)\nforall x (Evangelize(x, elaine) and Weightlift(x, othello) -> Evangelize(elaine, jacenta))\nforall x (Evangelize(x, jacenta) and Photostat(jacenta, othello) -> Evangelize(othello, elaine))\nforall x (Weightlift(x, patrick) and Evangelize(patrick, othello) -> Spavined(patrick))\nforall x (Spavined(x) -> Weightlift(x, elaine))\nforall x (Shrubby(x) and Evangelize(x, elaine) -> Shrubby(elaine))\nforall x (Weightlift(x, elaine) -> Evangelize(x, patrick))\n\nShrubby(elaine)\n\nforall x (Shrubby(x) and Evangelize(x, elaine) -> Shrubby(elaine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The terrell wangle the dyan. The terrell aliment the dyan. The trude is pally. The trude is coriaceous. The trude outperform the dyan. The dyan wangle the trude. The dyan wangle the tabitha. The dyan is unnameable. The dyan is stray. The dyan is coriaceous. The tabitha is unnameable. The tabitha is coriaceous. The tabitha aliment the dyan. The tabitha outperform the terrell. The tabitha outperform the dyan. If someone is stray and they eat the terrell then they are pally. If the terrell is pally then the terrell outperform the trude. If someone wangle the tabitha and they visit the trude then the tabitha wangle the dyan. If someone wangle the dyan and the dyan aliment the trude then the trude wangle the tabitha. If someone outperform the terrell and the terrell wangle the trude then the terrell is coriaceous. If someone is coriaceous then they visit the tabitha. If someone is riddled and they eat the tabitha then the tabitha is riddled. If someone outperform the tabitha then they eat the terrell. The tabitha is not stray.", "logic": "\nWangle(terrell, dyan)\nAliment(terrell, dyan)\nPally(trude)\nCoriaceous(trude)\nOutperform(trude, dyan)\nWangle(dyan, trude)\nWangle(dyan, tabitha)\nUnnameable(dyan)\nStray(dyan)\nCoriaceous(dyan)\nUnnameable(tabitha)\nCoriaceous(tabitha)\nAliment(tabitha, dyan)\nOutperform(tabitha, terrell)\nOutperform(tabitha, dyan)\nforall x (Stray(x) and Wangle(x, terrell) -> Pally(x))\nPally(terrell) -> Outperform(terrell, trude)\nforall x (Wangle(x, tabitha) and Outperform(x, trude) -> Wangle(tabitha, dyan))\nforall x (Wangle(x, dyan) and Aliment(dyan, trude) -> Wangle(trude, tabitha))\nforall x (Outperform(x, terrell) and Wangle(terrell, trude) -> Coriaceous(terrell))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Outperform(x, tabitha))\nforall x (Riddled(x) and Wangle(x, tabitha) -> Riddled(tabitha))\nforall x (Outperform(x, tabitha) -> Wangle(x, terrell))\n\nnot Stray(tabitha)\n\nnot Stray(tabitha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The harrie domicile the laina. The harrie ransom the laina. The fidelity is votive. The fidelity is snobby. The fidelity erupt the laina. The laina domicile the fidelity. The laina domicile the tymon. The laina is heraldic. The laina is quondam. The laina is snobby. The tymon is heraldic. The tymon is snobby. The tymon ransom the laina. The tymon erupt the harrie. The tymon erupt the laina. If someone is quondam and they eat the harrie then they are votive. If the harrie is votive then the harrie erupt the fidelity. If someone domicile the tymon and they visit the fidelity then the tymon domicile the laina. If someone domicile the laina and the laina ransom the fidelity then the fidelity domicile the tymon. If someone erupt the harrie and the harrie domicile the fidelity then the harrie is snobby. If someone is snobby then they visit the tymon. If someone is sinning and they eat the tymon then the tymon is sinning. If someone erupt the tymon then they eat the harrie. The fidelity is quondam.", "logic": "\nDomicile(harrie, laina)\nRansom(harrie, laina)\nVotive(fidelity)\nSnobby(fidelity)\nErupt(fidelity, laina)\nDomicile(laina, fidelity)\nDomicile(laina, tymon)\nHeraldic(laina)\nQuondam(laina)\nSnobby(laina)\nHeraldic(tymon)\nSnobby(tymon)\nRansom(tymon, laina)\nErupt(tymon, harrie)\nErupt(tymon, laina)\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Domicile(x, harrie) -> Votive(x))\nVotive(harrie) -> Erupt(harrie, fidelity)\nforall x (Domicile(x, tymon) and Erupt(x, fidelity) -> Domicile(tymon, laina))\nforall x (Domicile(x, laina) and Ransom(laina, fidelity) -> Domicile(fidelity, tymon))\nforall x (Erupt(x, harrie) and Domicile(harrie, fidelity) -> Snobby(harrie))\nforall x (Snobby(x) -> Erupt(x, tymon))\nforall x (Sinning(x) and Domicile(x, tymon) -> Sinning(tymon))\nforall x (Erupt(x, tymon) -> Domicile(x, harrie))\n\nQuondam(fidelity)\n\nQuondam(fidelity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The stormy strip the richie. The stormy chevvy the richie. The geof is uncensored. The geof is maximum. The geof obligate the richie. The richie strip the geof. The richie strip the noell. The richie is carpellate. The richie is bottommost. The richie is maximum. The noell is carpellate. The noell is maximum. The noell chevvy the richie. The noell obligate the stormy. The noell obligate the richie. If someone is bottommost and they eat the stormy then they are uncensored. If the stormy is uncensored then the stormy obligate the geof. If someone strip the noell and they visit the geof then the noell strip the richie. If someone strip the richie and the richie chevvy the geof then the geof strip the noell. If someone obligate the stormy and the stormy strip the geof then the stormy is maximum. If someone is maximum then they visit the noell. If someone is inbuilt and they eat the noell then the noell is inbuilt. If someone obligate the noell then they eat the stormy. The geof does not see the geof.", "logic": "\nStrip(stormy, richie)\nChevvy(stormy, richie)\nUncensored(geof)\nMaximum(geof)\nObligate(geof, richie)\nStrip(richie, geof)\nStrip(richie, noell)\nCarpellate(richie)\nBottommost(richie)\nMaximum(richie)\nCarpellate(noell)\nMaximum(noell)\nChevvy(noell, richie)\nObligate(noell, stormy)\nObligate(noell, richie)\nforall x (Bottommost(x) and Strip(x, stormy) -> Uncensored(x))\nUncensored(stormy) -> Obligate(stormy, geof)\nforall x (Strip(x, noell) and Obligate(x, geof) -> Strip(noell, richie))\nforall x (Strip(x, richie) and Chevvy(richie, geof) -> Strip(geof, noell))\nforall x (Obligate(x, stormy) and Strip(stormy, geof) -> Maximum(stormy))\nforall x (Maximum(x) -> Obligate(x, noell))\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) and Strip(x, noell) -> Inbuilt(noell))\nforall x (Obligate(x, noell) -> Strip(x, stormy))\n\nnot Chevvy(geof, geof)\n\nnot Chevvy(geof, geof) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "The sally underwrite the lacie. The sally reimpose the lacie. The gearard is unrevealed. The gearard is dressed. The gearard eschew the lacie. The lacie underwrite the gearard. The lacie underwrite the ambrosi. The lacie is apophyseal. The lacie is chaldee. The lacie is dressed. The ambrosi is apophyseal. The ambrosi is dressed. The ambrosi reimpose the lacie. The ambrosi eschew the sally. The ambrosi eschew the lacie. If someone is chaldee and they eat the sally then they are unrevealed. If the sally is unrevealed then the sally eschew the gearard. If someone underwrite the ambrosi and they visit the gearard then the ambrosi underwrite the lacie. If someone underwrite the lacie and the lacie reimpose the gearard then the gearard underwrite the ambrosi. If someone eschew the sally and the sally underwrite the gearard then the sally is dressed. If someone is dressed then they visit the ambrosi. If someone is insistent and they eat the ambrosi then the ambrosi is insistent. If someone eschew the ambrosi then they eat the sally. The lacie reimpose the lacie.", "logic": "\nUnderwrite(sally, lacie)\nReimpose(sally, lacie)\nUnrevealed(gearard)\nDressed(gearard)\nEschew(gearard, lacie)\nUnderwrite(lacie, gearard)\nUnderwrite(lacie, ambrosi)\nApophyseal(lacie)\nChaldee(lacie)\nDressed(lacie)\nApophyseal(ambrosi)\nDressed(ambrosi)\nReimpose(ambrosi, lacie)\nEschew(ambrosi, sally)\nEschew(ambrosi, lacie)\nforall x (Chaldee(x) and Underwrite(x, sally) -> Unrevealed(x))\nUnrevealed(sally) -> Eschew(sally, gearard)\nforall x (Underwrite(x, ambrosi) and Eschew(x, gearard) -> Underwrite(ambrosi, lacie))\nforall x (Underwrite(x, lacie) and Reimpose(lacie, gearard) -> Underwrite(gearard, ambrosi))\nforall x (Eschew(x, sally) and Underwrite(sally, gearard) -> Dressed(sally))\nforall x (Dressed(x) -> Eschew(x, ambrosi))\nforall x (Insistent(x) and Underwrite(x, ambrosi) -> Insistent(ambrosi))\nforall x (Eschew(x, ambrosi) -> Underwrite(x, sally))\n\nReimpose(lacie, lacie)\n\nReimpose(lacie, lacie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-47"} {"premises": "Paulina is peroneal. Lindy is nerveless. Robbie is spirituous. Young, dialectic things are peroneal. All nerveless things are posthumous. If something is posthumous then it is peroneal. Young, peroneal things are sagacious. If Paulina is nerveless and Paulina is peroneal then Paulina is dialectic. All nerveless things are dialectic. All nerveless, sagacious things are spirituous. If something is dialectic and posthumous then it is tinselly. Paulina is peroneal.", "logic": "\nPeroneal(paulina)\nNerveless(lindy)\nSpirituous(robbie)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and Dialectic(x) -> Peroneal(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Posthumous(x))\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Peroneal(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and Peroneal(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nNerveless(paulina) and Peroneal(paulina) -> Dialectic(paulina)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> Dialectic(x))\nforall x (Nerveless(x) and Sagacious(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Dialectic(x) and Posthumous(x) -> Tinselly(x))\n\nPeroneal(paulina)\n\ntherefore Peroneal(paulina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Ernie is weakly. Myke is erosive. Lucilia is veterinary. Young, moresque things are weakly. All erosive things are conceited. If something is conceited then it is weakly. Young, weakly things are treble. If Ernie is erosive and Ernie is weakly then Ernie is moresque. All erosive things are moresque. All erosive, treble things are veterinary. If something is moresque and conceited then it is squeaky. Ernie is not weakly.", "logic": "\nWeakly(ernie)\nErosive(myke)\nVeterinary(lucilia)\nforall x (Erosive(x) and Moresque(x) -> Weakly(x))\nforall x (Erosive(x) -> Conceited(x))\nforall x (Conceited(x) -> Weakly(x))\nforall x (Erosive(x) and Weakly(x) -> Treble(x))\nErosive(ernie) and Weakly(ernie) -> Moresque(ernie)\nforall x (Erosive(x) -> Moresque(x))\nforall x (Erosive(x) and Treble(x) -> Veterinary(x))\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Conceited(x) -> Squeaky(x))\n\nnot Weakly(ernie)\n\ntherefore Weakly(ernie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Ingunna is nourished. Vernice is observed. Newton is inky. Young, drizzly things are nourished. All observed things are aboral. If something is aboral then it is nourished. Young, nourished things are ossicular. If Ingunna is observed and Ingunna is nourished then Ingunna is drizzly. All observed things are drizzly. All observed, ossicular things are inky. If something is drizzly and aboral then it is cattish. Vernice is aboral.", "logic": "\nNourished(ingunna)\nObserved(vernice)\nInky(newton)\nforall x (Observed(x) and Drizzly(x) -> Nourished(x))\nforall x (Observed(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Aboral(x) -> Nourished(x))\nforall x (Observed(x) and Nourished(x) -> Ossicular(x))\nObserved(ingunna) and Nourished(ingunna) -> Drizzly(ingunna)\nforall x (Observed(x) -> Drizzly(x))\nforall x (Observed(x) and Ossicular(x) -> Inky(x))\nforall x (Drizzly(x) and Aboral(x) -> Cattish(x))\n\nAboral(vernice)\n\nObserved(vernice) and forall x (Observed(x) -> Aboral(x)) -> therefore Aboral(vernice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Norm is bracteal. Melita is stellate. Nancee is benefic. Young, braced things are bracteal. All stellate things are phylliform. If something is phylliform then it is bracteal. Young, bracteal things are needless. If Norm is stellate and Norm is bracteal then Norm is braced. All stellate things are braced. All stellate, needless things are benefic. If something is braced and phylliform then it is nauseous. Melita is not phylliform.", "logic": "\nBracteal(norm)\nStellate(melita)\nBenefic(nancee)\nforall x (Stellate(x) and Braced(x) -> Bracteal(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Phylliform(x) -> Bracteal(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) and Bracteal(x) -> Needless(x))\nStellate(norm) and Bracteal(norm) -> Braced(norm)\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Braced(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) and Needless(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Braced(x) and Phylliform(x) -> Nauseous(x))\n\nnot Phylliform(melita)\n\nStellate(melita) and forall x (Stellate(x) -> Phylliform(x)) -> therefore Phylliform(melita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Angelique is thumping. Niles is cardinal. Sterne is inaugural. Young, elysian things are thumping. All cardinal things are intrastate. If something is intrastate then it is thumping. Young, thumping things are admissible. If Angelique is cardinal and Angelique is thumping then Angelique is elysian. All cardinal things are elysian. All cardinal, admissible things are inaugural. If something is elysian and intrastate then it is edentulous. Niles is thumping.", "logic": "\nThumping(angelique)\nCardinal(niles)\nInaugural(sterne)\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Elysian(x) -> Thumping(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) -> Thumping(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Thumping(x) -> Admissible(x))\nCardinal(angelique) and Thumping(angelique) -> Elysian(angelique)\nforall x (Cardinal(x) -> Elysian(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Admissible(x) -> Inaugural(x))\nforall x (Elysian(x) and Intrastate(x) -> Edentulous(x))\n\nThumping(niles)\n\nCardinal(niles) and forall x (Cardinal(x) -> Intrastate(x)) -> therefore Intrastate(niles) Intrastate(niles) and forall x (Intrastate(x) -> Thumping(x)) -> therefore Thumping(niles)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Sussi is azure. Julee is bearing. Elsa is initial. Young, lifted things are azure. All bearing things are trillionth. If something is trillionth then it is azure. Young, azure things are agile. If Sussi is bearing and Sussi is azure then Sussi is lifted. All bearing things are lifted. All bearing, agile things are initial. If something is lifted and trillionth then it is unversed. Julee is not unversed.", "logic": "\nAzure(sussi)\nBearing(julee)\nInitial(elsa)\nforall x (Bearing(x) and Lifted(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Trillionth(x))\nforall x (Trillionth(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) and Azure(x) -> Agile(x))\nBearing(sussi) and Azure(sussi) -> Lifted(sussi)\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Lifted(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) and Agile(x) -> Initial(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Trillionth(x) -> Unversed(x))\n\nnot Unversed(julee)\n\nBearing(julee) and forall x (Bearing(x) -> Lifted(x)) -> therefore Lifted(julee) Bearing(julee) and forall x (Bearing(x) -> Trillionth(x)) -> therefore Trillionth(julee) Lifted(julee) and Trillionth(julee) and forall x (Lifted(x) and Trillionth(x) -> Unversed(x)) -> therefore Unversed(julee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Dode is tanzanian. Chaddie is ideational. Josepha is herculean. Young, chassidic things are tanzanian. All ideational things are virgin. If something is virgin then it is tanzanian. Young, tanzanian things are ghanese. If Dode is ideational and Dode is tanzanian then Dode is chassidic. All ideational things are chassidic. All ideational, ghanese things are herculean. If something is chassidic and virgin then it is ashamed. Chaddie is ghanese.", "logic": "\nTanzanian(dode)\nIdeational(chaddie)\nHerculean(josepha)\nforall x (Ideational(x) and Chassidic(x) -> Tanzanian(x))\nforall x (Ideational(x) -> Virgin(x))\nforall x (Virgin(x) -> Tanzanian(x))\nforall x (Ideational(x) and Tanzanian(x) -> Ghanese(x))\nIdeational(dode) and Tanzanian(dode) -> Chassidic(dode)\nforall x (Ideational(x) -> Chassidic(x))\nforall x (Ideational(x) and Ghanese(x) -> Herculean(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) and Virgin(x) -> Ashamed(x))\n\nGhanese(chaddie)\n\nIdeational(chaddie) and forall x (Ideational(x) -> Virgin(x)) -> therefore Virgin(chaddie) Virgin(chaddie) and forall x (Virgin(x) -> Tanzanian(x)) -> therefore Tanzanian(chaddie) Ideational(chaddie) and Tanzanian(chaddie) and forall x (Ideational(x) and Tanzanian(x) -> Ghanese(x)) -> therefore Ghanese(chaddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Amber is shakedown. Dolli is revised. Querida is eastbound. Young, militant things are shakedown. All revised things are semihard. If something is semihard then it is shakedown. Young, shakedown things are starred. If Amber is revised and Amber is shakedown then Amber is militant. All revised things are militant. All revised, starred things are eastbound. If something is militant and semihard then it is whispered. Dolli is not starred.", "logic": "\nShakedown(amber)\nRevised(dolli)\nEastbound(querida)\nforall x (Revised(x) and Militant(x) -> Shakedown(x))\nforall x (Revised(x) -> Semihard(x))\nforall x (Semihard(x) -> Shakedown(x))\nforall x (Revised(x) and Shakedown(x) -> Starred(x))\nRevised(amber) and Shakedown(amber) -> Militant(amber)\nforall x (Revised(x) -> Militant(x))\nforall x (Revised(x) and Starred(x) -> Eastbound(x))\nforall x (Militant(x) and Semihard(x) -> Whispered(x))\n\nnot Starred(dolli)\n\nRevised(dolli) and forall x (Revised(x) -> Semihard(x)) -> therefore Semihard(dolli) Semihard(dolli) and forall x (Semihard(x) -> Shakedown(x)) -> therefore Shakedown(dolli) Revised(dolli) and Shakedown(dolli) and forall x (Revised(x) and Shakedown(x) -> Starred(x)) -> therefore Starred(dolli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Lucilia is opportune. Annabell is incendiary. Hephzibah is alpine. Young, paradisaic things are opportune. All incendiary things are engaged. If something is engaged then it is opportune. Young, opportune things are scrubbed. If Lucilia is incendiary and Lucilia is opportune then Lucilia is paradisaic. All incendiary things are paradisaic. All incendiary, scrubbed things are alpine. If something is paradisaic and engaged then it is estrogenic. Hephzibah is not estrogenic.", "logic": "\nOpportune(lucilia)\nIncendiary(annabell)\nAlpine(hephzibah)\nforall x (Incendiary(x) and Paradisaic(x) -> Opportune(x))\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> Engaged(x))\nforall x (Engaged(x) -> Opportune(x))\nforall x (Incendiary(x) and Opportune(x) -> Scrubbed(x))\nIncendiary(lucilia) and Opportune(lucilia) -> Paradisaic(lucilia)\nforall x (Incendiary(x) -> Paradisaic(x))\nforall x (Incendiary(x) and Scrubbed(x) -> Alpine(x))\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) and Engaged(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\n\nnot Estrogenic(hephzibah)\n\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) and Engaged(x) -> Estrogenic(x)) <- forall x (Incendiary(x) -> Paradisaic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Helsa is frigorific. Reta is peanut. Jeth is isomeric. Young, recluse things are frigorific. All peanut things are foggy. If something is foggy then it is frigorific. Young, frigorific things are waxlike. If Helsa is peanut and Helsa is frigorific then Helsa is recluse. All peanut things are recluse. All peanut, waxlike things are isomeric. If something is recluse and foggy then it is overlying. Jeth is waxlike.", "logic": "\nFrigorific(helsa)\nPeanut(reta)\nIsomeric(jeth)\nforall x (Peanut(x) and Recluse(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Frigorific(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) and Frigorific(x) -> Waxlike(x))\nPeanut(helsa) and Frigorific(helsa) -> Recluse(helsa)\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Recluse(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) and Waxlike(x) -> Isomeric(x))\nforall x (Recluse(x) and Foggy(x) -> Overlying(x))\n\nWaxlike(jeth)\n\nforall x (Peanut(x) and Frigorific(x) -> Waxlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Minta is volatile. Issi is metalloid. Odetta is slippy. Young, textured things are volatile. All metalloid things are schizoid. If something is schizoid then it is volatile. Young, volatile things are charnel. If Minta is metalloid and Minta is volatile then Minta is textured. All metalloid things are textured. All metalloid, charnel things are slippy. If something is textured and schizoid then it is kosher. Minta is not schizoid.", "logic": "\nVolatile(minta)\nMetalloid(issi)\nSlippy(odetta)\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Textured(x) -> Volatile(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nforall x (Schizoid(x) -> Volatile(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Volatile(x) -> Charnel(x))\nMetalloid(minta) and Volatile(minta) -> Textured(minta)\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Textured(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Charnel(x) -> Slippy(x))\nforall x (Textured(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Kosher(x))\n\nnot Schizoid(minta)\n\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Schizoid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Willy is busy. Sapphira is pectic. Iggie is umbellate. Young, suborbital things are busy. All pectic things are conjunct. If something is conjunct then it is busy. Young, busy things are berserk. If Willy is pectic and Willy is busy then Willy is suborbital. All pectic things are suborbital. All pectic, berserk things are umbellate. If something is suborbital and conjunct then it is unequal. Iggie is busy.", "logic": "\nBusy(willy)\nPectic(sapphira)\nUmbellate(iggie)\nforall x (Pectic(x) and Suborbital(x) -> Busy(x))\nforall x (Pectic(x) -> Conjunct(x))\nforall x (Conjunct(x) -> Busy(x))\nforall x (Pectic(x) and Busy(x) -> Berserk(x))\nPectic(willy) and Busy(willy) -> Suborbital(willy)\nforall x (Pectic(x) -> Suborbital(x))\nforall x (Pectic(x) and Berserk(x) -> Umbellate(x))\nforall x (Suborbital(x) and Conjunct(x) -> Unequal(x))\n\nBusy(iggie)\n\nforall x (Conjunct(x) -> Busy(x)) <- forall x (Pectic(x) -> Conjunct(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Linoel is coastal. Adrianna is spotless. Deeanne is chartless. Young, blithesome things are coastal. All spotless things are unsown. If something is unsown then it is coastal. Young, coastal things are springlike. If Linoel is spotless and Linoel is coastal then Linoel is blithesome. All spotless things are blithesome. All spotless, springlike things are chartless. If something is blithesome and unsown then it is snuffling. Linoel is not spotless.", "logic": "\nCoastal(linoel)\nSpotless(adrianna)\nChartless(deeanne)\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Blithesome(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) -> Unsown(x))\nforall x (Unsown(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Coastal(x) -> Springlike(x))\nSpotless(linoel) and Coastal(linoel) -> Blithesome(linoel)\nforall x (Spotless(x) -> Blithesome(x))\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Springlike(x) -> Chartless(x))\nforall x (Blithesome(x) and Unsown(x) -> Snuffling(x))\n\nnot Spotless(linoel)\n\nnot Spotless(linoel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Hally is shut. Leda is consistent. Sim is anaclitic. Young, mixed things are shut. All consistent things are ternate. If something is ternate then it is shut. Young, shut things are prudish. If Hally is consistent and Hally is shut then Hally is mixed. All consistent things are mixed. All consistent, prudish things are anaclitic. If something is mixed and ternate then it is cryptical. Sim is consistent.", "logic": "\nShut(hally)\nConsistent(leda)\nAnaclitic(sim)\nforall x (Consistent(x) and Mixed(x) -> Shut(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Ternate(x) -> Shut(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) and Shut(x) -> Prudish(x))\nConsistent(hally) and Shut(hally) -> Mixed(hally)\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Mixed(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) and Prudish(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Mixed(x) and Ternate(x) -> Cryptical(x))\n\nConsistent(sim)\n\nConsistent(sim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1323"} {"premises": "Mehetabel is albinotic. Mehetabel is humic. Mehetabel is particular. Elwyn is ideal. Elwyn is albinotic. Elwyn is religious. Fleming is particular. Fleming is downscale. Fleming is religious. Daren is religious. If Mehetabel is not anorectal and Mehetabel is not religious then Mehetabel is humic. Quiet things are downscale. If Daren is religious then Daren is humic. Blue things are humic. If Elwyn is downscale then Elwyn is not particular. If something is anorectal then it is albinotic. Fleming is downscale.", "logic": "\nAlbinotic(mehetabel)\nHumic(mehetabel)\nParticular(mehetabel)\nIdeal(elwyn)\nAlbinotic(elwyn)\nReligious(elwyn)\nParticular(fleming)\nDownscale(fleming)\nReligious(fleming)\nReligious(daren)\nnot Anorectal(mehetabel) and not Religious(mehetabel) -> Humic(mehetabel)\nforall x (Humic(x) -> Downscale(x))\nReligious(daren) -> Humic(daren)\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Humic(x))\nDownscale(elwyn) -> not Particular(elwyn)\nforall x (Anorectal(x) -> Albinotic(x))\n\nDownscale(fleming)\n\ntherefore Downscale(fleming)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Randal is unaired. Randal is ghostly. Randal is contagious. Luciana is unpunished. Luciana is unaired. Luciana is apodous. Tracy is contagious. Tracy is lymphatic. Tracy is apodous. Sianna is apodous. If Randal is not watered and Randal is not apodous then Randal is ghostly. Quiet things are lymphatic. If Sianna is apodous then Sianna is ghostly. Blue things are ghostly. If Luciana is lymphatic then Luciana is not contagious. If something is watered then it is unaired. Tracy is not contagious.", "logic": "\nUnaired(randal)\nGhostly(randal)\nContagious(randal)\nUnpunished(luciana)\nUnaired(luciana)\nApodous(luciana)\nContagious(tracy)\nLymphatic(tracy)\nApodous(tracy)\nApodous(sianna)\nnot Watered(randal) and not Apodous(randal) -> Ghostly(randal)\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Lymphatic(x))\nApodous(sianna) -> Ghostly(sianna)\nforall x (Unpunished(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nLymphatic(luciana) -> not Contagious(luciana)\nforall x (Watered(x) -> Unaired(x))\n\nnot Contagious(tracy)\n\ntherefore Contagious(tracy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Max is covert. Max is unwished. Max is rhombic. Willamina is sympatric. Willamina is covert. Willamina is profitable. Cabrina is rhombic. Cabrina is alienating. Cabrina is profitable. Marwin is profitable. If Max is not nonionized and Max is not profitable then Max is unwished. Quiet things are alienating. If Marwin is profitable then Marwin is unwished. Blue things are unwished. If Willamina is alienating then Willamina is not rhombic. If something is nonionized then it is covert. Willamina is unwished.", "logic": "\nCovert(max)\nUnwished(max)\nRhombic(max)\nSympatric(willamina)\nCovert(willamina)\nProfitable(willamina)\nRhombic(cabrina)\nAlienating(cabrina)\nProfitable(cabrina)\nProfitable(marwin)\nnot Nonionized(max) and not Profitable(max) -> Unwished(max)\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> Alienating(x))\nProfitable(marwin) -> Unwished(marwin)\nforall x (Sympatric(x) -> Unwished(x))\nAlienating(willamina) -> not Rhombic(willamina)\nforall x (Nonionized(x) -> Covert(x))\n\nUnwished(willamina)\n\nSympatric(willamina) and forall x (Sympatric(x) -> Unwished(x)) -> therefore Unwished(willamina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Mersey is maiden. Mersey is considered. Mersey is staminate. Mortimer is unredeemed. Mortimer is maiden. Mortimer is wretched. Anson is staminate. Anson is impolitic. Anson is wretched. Giraldo is wretched. If Mersey is not stimulant and Mersey is not wretched then Mersey is considered. Quiet things are impolitic. If Giraldo is wretched then Giraldo is considered. Blue things are considered. If Mortimer is impolitic then Mortimer is not staminate. If something is stimulant then it is maiden. Mersey is not impolitic.", "logic": "\nMaiden(mersey)\nConsidered(mersey)\nStaminate(mersey)\nUnredeemed(mortimer)\nMaiden(mortimer)\nWretched(mortimer)\nStaminate(anson)\nImpolitic(anson)\nWretched(anson)\nWretched(giraldo)\nnot Stimulant(mersey) and not Wretched(mersey) -> Considered(mersey)\nforall x (Considered(x) -> Impolitic(x))\nWretched(giraldo) -> Considered(giraldo)\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Considered(x))\nImpolitic(mortimer) -> not Staminate(mortimer)\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> Maiden(x))\n\nnot Impolitic(mersey)\n\nConsidered(mersey) and forall x (Considered(x) -> Impolitic(x)) -> therefore Impolitic(mersey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Mic is boneless. Mic is flavourful. Mic is spineless. Taryn is portuguese. Taryn is boneless. Taryn is diarrheal. Leese is spineless. Leese is navigable. Leese is diarrheal. Fairfax is diarrheal. If Mic is not sullen and Mic is not diarrheal then Mic is flavourful. Quiet things are navigable. If Fairfax is diarrheal then Fairfax is flavourful. Blue things are flavourful. If Taryn is navigable then Taryn is not spineless. If something is sullen then it is boneless. Taryn is navigable.", "logic": "\nBoneless(mic)\nFlavourful(mic)\nSpineless(mic)\nPortuguese(taryn)\nBoneless(taryn)\nDiarrheal(taryn)\nSpineless(leese)\nNavigable(leese)\nDiarrheal(leese)\nDiarrheal(fairfax)\nnot Sullen(mic) and not Diarrheal(mic) -> Flavourful(mic)\nforall x (Flavourful(x) -> Navigable(x))\nDiarrheal(fairfax) -> Flavourful(fairfax)\nforall x (Portuguese(x) -> Flavourful(x))\nNavigable(taryn) -> not Spineless(taryn)\nforall x (Sullen(x) -> Boneless(x))\n\nNavigable(taryn)\n\nPortuguese(taryn) and forall x (Portuguese(x) -> Flavourful(x)) -> therefore Flavourful(taryn) Flavourful(taryn) and forall x (Flavourful(x) -> Navigable(x)) -> therefore Navigable(taryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Bjorn is tipsy. Bjorn is depleted. Bjorn is corrective. Moyra is gritty. Moyra is tipsy. Moyra is kindly. Penny is corrective. Penny is destined. Penny is kindly. Chanda is kindly. If Bjorn is not lackluster and Bjorn is not kindly then Bjorn is depleted. Quiet things are destined. If Chanda is kindly then Chanda is depleted. Blue things are depleted. If Moyra is destined then Moyra is not corrective. If something is lackluster then it is tipsy. Chanda is not destined.", "logic": "\nTipsy(bjorn)\nDepleted(bjorn)\nCorrective(bjorn)\nGritty(moyra)\nTipsy(moyra)\nKindly(moyra)\nCorrective(penny)\nDestined(penny)\nKindly(penny)\nKindly(chanda)\nnot Lackluster(bjorn) and not Kindly(bjorn) -> Depleted(bjorn)\nforall x (Depleted(x) -> Destined(x))\nKindly(chanda) -> Depleted(chanda)\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Depleted(x))\nDestined(moyra) -> not Corrective(moyra)\nforall x (Lackluster(x) -> Tipsy(x))\n\nnot Destined(chanda)\n\nKindly(chanda) and Kindly(chanda) -> Depleted(chanda) -> therefore Depleted(chanda) Depleted(chanda) and forall x (Depleted(x) -> Destined(x)) -> therefore Destined(chanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Stacee is acroscopic. Stacee is cairned. Stacee is spanking. Fanni is completing. Fanni is acroscopic. Fanni is disabled. Gabriella is spanking. Gabriella is consoling. Gabriella is disabled. Pedro is disabled. If Stacee is not combinable and Stacee is not disabled then Stacee is cairned. Quiet things are consoling. If Pedro is disabled then Pedro is cairned. Blue things are cairned. If Fanni is consoling then Fanni is not spanking. If something is combinable then it is acroscopic. Fanni is not spanking.", "logic": "\nAcroscopic(stacee)\nCairned(stacee)\nSpanking(stacee)\nCompleting(fanni)\nAcroscopic(fanni)\nDisabled(fanni)\nSpanking(gabriella)\nConsoling(gabriella)\nDisabled(gabriella)\nDisabled(pedro)\nnot Combinable(stacee) and not Disabled(stacee) -> Cairned(stacee)\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Consoling(x))\nDisabled(pedro) -> Cairned(pedro)\nforall x (Completing(x) -> Cairned(x))\nConsoling(fanni) -> not Spanking(fanni)\nforall x (Combinable(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\n\nnot Spanking(fanni)\n\nCompleting(fanni) and forall x (Completing(x) -> Cairned(x)) -> therefore Cairned(fanni) Cairned(fanni) and forall x (Cairned(x) -> Consoling(x)) -> therefore Consoling(fanni) Consoling(fanni) and Consoling(fanni) -> not Spanking(fanni) -> therefore not Spanking(fanni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Dimitri is peaky. Dimitri is contorted. Dimitri is headless. Corella is emmetropic. Corella is peaky. Corella is lobed. Mischa is headless. Mischa is mitigative. Mischa is lobed. Gabe is lobed. If Dimitri is not bumbling and Dimitri is not lobed then Dimitri is contorted. Quiet things are mitigative. If Gabe is lobed then Gabe is contorted. Blue things are contorted. If Corella is mitigative then Corella is not headless. If something is bumbling then it is peaky. Corella is headless.", "logic": "\nPeaky(dimitri)\nContorted(dimitri)\nHeadless(dimitri)\nEmmetropic(corella)\nPeaky(corella)\nLobed(corella)\nHeadless(mischa)\nMitigative(mischa)\nLobed(mischa)\nLobed(gabe)\nnot Bumbling(dimitri) and not Lobed(dimitri) -> Contorted(dimitri)\nforall x (Contorted(x) -> Mitigative(x))\nLobed(gabe) -> Contorted(gabe)\nforall x (Emmetropic(x) -> Contorted(x))\nMitigative(corella) -> not Headless(corella)\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Peaky(x))\n\nHeadless(corella)\n\nEmmetropic(corella) and forall x (Emmetropic(x) -> Contorted(x)) -> therefore Contorted(corella) Contorted(corella) and forall x (Contorted(x) -> Mitigative(x)) -> therefore Mitigative(corella) Mitigative(corella) and Mitigative(corella) -> not Headless(corella) -> therefore not Headless(corella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Corabelle is monarchal. Corabelle is olfactive. Corabelle is bosky. Ninetta is numb. Ninetta is monarchal. Ninetta is follicular. Murdock is bosky. Murdock is nephritic. Murdock is follicular. Kippie is follicular. If Corabelle is not untrusty and Corabelle is not follicular then Corabelle is olfactive. Quiet things are nephritic. If Kippie is follicular then Kippie is olfactive. Blue things are olfactive. If Ninetta is nephritic then Ninetta is not bosky. If something is untrusty then it is monarchal. Kippie is not monarchal.", "logic": "\nMonarchal(corabelle)\nOlfactive(corabelle)\nBosky(corabelle)\nNumb(ninetta)\nMonarchal(ninetta)\nFollicular(ninetta)\nBosky(murdock)\nNephritic(murdock)\nFollicular(murdock)\nFollicular(kippie)\nnot Untrusty(corabelle) and not Follicular(corabelle) -> Olfactive(corabelle)\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Nephritic(x))\nFollicular(kippie) -> Olfactive(kippie)\nforall x (Numb(x) -> Olfactive(x))\nNephritic(ninetta) -> not Bosky(ninetta)\nforall x (Untrusty(x) -> Monarchal(x))\n\nnot Monarchal(kippie)\n\nforall x (Untrusty(x) -> Monarchal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Ainslee is squirting. Ainslee is footling. Ainslee is adsorbent. Legra is christian. Legra is squirting. Legra is anamnestic. Cybelle is adsorbent. Cybelle is unarmed. Cybelle is anamnestic. Michale is anamnestic. If Ainslee is not comburant and Ainslee is not anamnestic then Ainslee is footling. Quiet things are unarmed. If Michale is anamnestic then Michale is footling. Blue things are footling. If Legra is unarmed then Legra is not adsorbent. If something is comburant then it is squirting. Cybelle is squirting.", "logic": "\nSquirting(ainslee)\nFootling(ainslee)\nAdsorbent(ainslee)\nChristian(legra)\nSquirting(legra)\nAnamnestic(legra)\nAdsorbent(cybelle)\nUnarmed(cybelle)\nAnamnestic(cybelle)\nAnamnestic(michale)\nnot Comburant(ainslee) and not Anamnestic(ainslee) -> Footling(ainslee)\nforall x (Footling(x) -> Unarmed(x))\nAnamnestic(michale) -> Footling(michale)\nforall x (Christian(x) -> Footling(x))\nUnarmed(legra) -> not Adsorbent(legra)\nforall x (Comburant(x) -> Squirting(x))\n\nSquirting(cybelle)\n\nforall x (Comburant(x) -> Squirting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Lukas is confusing. Lukas is macho. Lukas is unspecific. Cornela is gusseted. Cornela is confusing. Cornela is oviform. Dinny is unspecific. Dinny is endovenous. Dinny is oviform. Gregorio is oviform. If Lukas is not nonliteral and Lukas is not oviform then Lukas is macho. Quiet things are endovenous. If Gregorio is oviform then Gregorio is macho. Blue things are macho. If Cornela is endovenous then Cornela is not unspecific. If something is nonliteral then it is confusing. Dinny is not macho.", "logic": "\nConfusing(lukas)\nMacho(lukas)\nUnspecific(lukas)\nGusseted(cornela)\nConfusing(cornela)\nOviform(cornela)\nUnspecific(dinny)\nEndovenous(dinny)\nOviform(dinny)\nOviform(gregorio)\nnot Nonliteral(lukas) and not Oviform(lukas) -> Macho(lukas)\nforall x (Macho(x) -> Endovenous(x))\nOviform(gregorio) -> Macho(gregorio)\nforall x (Gusseted(x) -> Macho(x))\nEndovenous(cornela) -> not Unspecific(cornela)\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Confusing(x))\n\nnot Macho(dinny)\n\nforall x (Gusseted(x) -> Macho(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Wendie is mayoral. Wendie is bombproof. Wendie is awesome. Uriel is boughten. Uriel is mayoral. Uriel is dyspeptic. Adele is awesome. Adele is magical. Adele is dyspeptic. Erhard is dyspeptic. If Wendie is not vegetive and Wendie is not dyspeptic then Wendie is bombproof. Quiet things are magical. If Erhard is dyspeptic then Erhard is bombproof. Blue things are bombproof. If Uriel is magical then Uriel is not awesome. If something is vegetive then it is mayoral. Erhard is vegetive.", "logic": "\nMayoral(wendie)\nBombproof(wendie)\nAwesome(wendie)\nBoughten(uriel)\nMayoral(uriel)\nDyspeptic(uriel)\nAwesome(adele)\nMagical(adele)\nDyspeptic(adele)\nDyspeptic(erhard)\nnot Vegetive(wendie) and not Dyspeptic(wendie) -> Bombproof(wendie)\nforall x (Bombproof(x) -> Magical(x))\nDyspeptic(erhard) -> Bombproof(erhard)\nforall x (Boughten(x) -> Bombproof(x))\nMagical(uriel) -> not Awesome(uriel)\nforall x (Vegetive(x) -> Mayoral(x))\n\nVegetive(erhard)\n\nVegetive(erhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Calypso is taiwanese. Calypso is striate. Calypso is hoarse. Mildred is uvular. Mildred is taiwanese. Mildred is glorified. Norma is hoarse. Norma is measured. Norma is glorified. Ami is glorified. If Calypso is not processed and Calypso is not glorified then Calypso is striate. Quiet things are measured. If Ami is glorified then Ami is striate. Blue things are striate. If Mildred is measured then Mildred is not hoarse. If something is processed then it is taiwanese. Mildred is not processed.", "logic": "\nTaiwanese(calypso)\nStriate(calypso)\nHoarse(calypso)\nUvular(mildred)\nTaiwanese(mildred)\nGlorified(mildred)\nHoarse(norma)\nMeasured(norma)\nGlorified(norma)\nGlorified(ami)\nnot Processed(calypso) and not Glorified(calypso) -> Striate(calypso)\nforall x (Striate(x) -> Measured(x))\nGlorified(ami) -> Striate(ami)\nforall x (Uvular(x) -> Striate(x))\nMeasured(mildred) -> not Hoarse(mildred)\nforall x (Processed(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\n\nnot Processed(mildred)\n\nnot Processed(mildred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Noami is nosey. Noami is allegoric. Noami is depressant. Kaitlynn is drastic. Kaitlynn is nosey. Kaitlynn is motiveless. Giffy is depressant. Giffy is slighting. Giffy is motiveless. Candice is motiveless. If Noami is not auriferous and Noami is not motiveless then Noami is allegoric. Quiet things are slighting. If Candice is motiveless then Candice is allegoric. Blue things are allegoric. If Kaitlynn is slighting then Kaitlynn is not depressant. If something is auriferous then it is nosey. Giffy is drastic.", "logic": "\nNosey(noami)\nAllegoric(noami)\nDepressant(noami)\nDrastic(kaitlynn)\nNosey(kaitlynn)\nMotiveless(kaitlynn)\nDepressant(giffy)\nSlighting(giffy)\nMotiveless(giffy)\nMotiveless(candice)\nnot Auriferous(noami) and not Motiveless(noami) -> Allegoric(noami)\nforall x (Allegoric(x) -> Slighting(x))\nMotiveless(candice) -> Allegoric(candice)\nforall x (Drastic(x) -> Allegoric(x))\nSlighting(kaitlynn) -> not Depressant(kaitlynn)\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Nosey(x))\n\nDrastic(giffy)\n\nDrastic(giffy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Jacquetta is epicurean. Jacquetta is stoppable. Jacquetta is microsomal. Pablo is conjugated. Pablo is epicurean. Pablo is noteworthy. Martelle is microsomal. Martelle is globose. Martelle is noteworthy. Duffie is noteworthy. If Jacquetta is not thundering and Jacquetta is not noteworthy then Jacquetta is stoppable. Quiet things are globose. If Duffie is noteworthy then Duffie is stoppable. Blue things are stoppable. If Pablo is globose then Pablo is not microsomal. If something is thundering then it is epicurean. Duffie is not conjugated.", "logic": "\nEpicurean(jacquetta)\nStoppable(jacquetta)\nMicrosomal(jacquetta)\nConjugated(pablo)\nEpicurean(pablo)\nNoteworthy(pablo)\nMicrosomal(martelle)\nGlobose(martelle)\nNoteworthy(martelle)\nNoteworthy(duffie)\nnot Thundering(jacquetta) and not Noteworthy(jacquetta) -> Stoppable(jacquetta)\nforall x (Stoppable(x) -> Globose(x))\nNoteworthy(duffie) -> Stoppable(duffie)\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nGlobose(pablo) -> not Microsomal(pablo)\nforall x (Thundering(x) -> Epicurean(x))\n\nnot Conjugated(duffie)\n\nnot Conjugated(duffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Clemente is veridical. Clemente is mandibular. Clemente is weeklong. Mella is lincolnian. Mella is veridical. Mella is allometric. Mohammad is weeklong. Mohammad is narrowed. Mohammad is allometric. Kali is allometric. If Clemente is not furrowed and Clemente is not allometric then Clemente is mandibular. Quiet things are narrowed. If Kali is allometric then Kali is mandibular. Blue things are mandibular. If Mella is narrowed then Mella is not weeklong. If something is furrowed then it is veridical. Kali is weeklong.", "logic": "\nVeridical(clemente)\nMandibular(clemente)\nWeeklong(clemente)\nLincolnian(mella)\nVeridical(mella)\nAllometric(mella)\nWeeklong(mohammad)\nNarrowed(mohammad)\nAllometric(mohammad)\nAllometric(kali)\nnot Furrowed(clemente) and not Allometric(clemente) -> Mandibular(clemente)\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Narrowed(x))\nAllometric(kali) -> Mandibular(kali)\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) -> Mandibular(x))\nNarrowed(mella) -> not Weeklong(mella)\nforall x (Furrowed(x) -> Veridical(x))\n\nWeeklong(kali)\n\nWeeklong(kali) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-949"} {"premises": "Cooper is not thundering. Cooper is evident. Donnajean is southward. Donnajean is evident. Donnajean is calm. Donnajean is satisfied. Keri is spry. Keri is thundering. Keri is calm. Keri is satisfied. Gerrard is southward. Gerrard is evident. Furry things are southward. If something is southward then it is xvii. All southward, spry things are xvii. If something is evident and not thundering then it is satisfied. Furry, xvii things are evident. All satisfied things are calm. If something is thundering and not satisfied then it is calm. All xvii things are calm. Donnajean is evident.", "logic": "\nnot Thundering(cooper)\nEvident(cooper)\nSouthward(donnajean)\nEvident(donnajean)\nCalm(donnajean)\nSatisfied(donnajean)\nSpry(keri)\nThundering(keri)\nCalm(keri)\nSatisfied(keri)\nSouthward(gerrard)\nEvident(gerrard)\nforall x (Spry(x) -> Southward(x))\nforall x (Southward(x) -> Xvii(x))\nforall x (Southward(x) and Spry(x) -> Xvii(x))\nforall x (Evident(x) and not Thundering(x) -> Satisfied(x))\nforall x (Spry(x) and Xvii(x) -> Evident(x))\nforall x (Satisfied(x) -> Calm(x))\nforall x (Thundering(x) and not Satisfied(x) -> Calm(x))\nforall x (Xvii(x) -> Calm(x))\n\nEvident(donnajean)\n\ntherefore Evident(donnajean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Marj is not lamentable. Marj is honeylike. Beatriz is woven. Beatriz is honeylike. Beatriz is fueled. Beatriz is exposed. Drea is reedy. Drea is lamentable. Drea is fueled. Drea is exposed. Armond is woven. Armond is honeylike. Furry things are woven. If something is woven then it is hymeneal. All woven, reedy things are hymeneal. If something is honeylike and not lamentable then it is exposed. Furry, hymeneal things are honeylike. All exposed things are fueled. If something is lamentable and not exposed then it is fueled. All hymeneal things are fueled. Armond is not woven.", "logic": "\nnot Lamentable(marj)\nHoneylike(marj)\nWoven(beatriz)\nHoneylike(beatriz)\nFueled(beatriz)\nExposed(beatriz)\nReedy(drea)\nLamentable(drea)\nFueled(drea)\nExposed(drea)\nWoven(armond)\nHoneylike(armond)\nforall x (Reedy(x) -> Woven(x))\nforall x (Woven(x) -> Hymeneal(x))\nforall x (Woven(x) and Reedy(x) -> Hymeneal(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) and not Lamentable(x) -> Exposed(x))\nforall x (Reedy(x) and Hymeneal(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> Fueled(x))\nforall x (Lamentable(x) and not Exposed(x) -> Fueled(x))\nforall x (Hymeneal(x) -> Fueled(x))\n\nnot Woven(armond)\n\ntherefore Woven(armond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Donal is not creaky. Donal is taciturn. Sergeant is inimical. Sergeant is taciturn. Sergeant is attached. Sergeant is seated. Faye is scurvy. Faye is creaky. Faye is attached. Faye is seated. Teddi is inimical. Teddi is taciturn. Furry things are inimical. If something is inimical then it is alert. All inimical, scurvy things are alert. If something is taciturn and not creaky then it is seated. Furry, alert things are taciturn. All seated things are attached. If something is creaky and not seated then it is attached. All alert things are attached. Teddi is alert.", "logic": "\nnot Creaky(donal)\nTaciturn(donal)\nInimical(sergeant)\nTaciturn(sergeant)\nAttached(sergeant)\nSeated(sergeant)\nScurvy(faye)\nCreaky(faye)\nAttached(faye)\nSeated(faye)\nInimical(teddi)\nTaciturn(teddi)\nforall x (Scurvy(x) -> Inimical(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) -> Alert(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Scurvy(x) -> Alert(x))\nforall x (Taciturn(x) and not Creaky(x) -> Seated(x))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and Alert(x) -> Taciturn(x))\nforall x (Seated(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Creaky(x) and not Seated(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Alert(x) -> Attached(x))\n\nAlert(teddi)\n\nInimical(teddi) and forall x (Inimical(x) -> Alert(x)) -> therefore Alert(teddi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Ella is not roofless. Ella is corneal. Madelyn is titulary. Madelyn is corneal. Madelyn is dubitable. Madelyn is anonymous. Katha is backhand. Katha is roofless. Katha is dubitable. Katha is anonymous. Jane is titulary. Jane is corneal. Furry things are titulary. If something is titulary then it is plushy. All titulary, backhand things are plushy. If something is corneal and not roofless then it is anonymous. Furry, plushy things are corneal. All anonymous things are dubitable. If something is roofless and not anonymous then it is dubitable. All plushy things are dubitable. Katha is not titulary.", "logic": "\nnot Roofless(ella)\nCorneal(ella)\nTitulary(madelyn)\nCorneal(madelyn)\nDubitable(madelyn)\nAnonymous(madelyn)\nBackhand(katha)\nRoofless(katha)\nDubitable(katha)\nAnonymous(katha)\nTitulary(jane)\nCorneal(jane)\nforall x (Backhand(x) -> Titulary(x))\nforall x (Titulary(x) -> Plushy(x))\nforall x (Titulary(x) and Backhand(x) -> Plushy(x))\nforall x (Corneal(x) and not Roofless(x) -> Anonymous(x))\nforall x (Backhand(x) and Plushy(x) -> Corneal(x))\nforall x (Anonymous(x) -> Dubitable(x))\nforall x (Roofless(x) and not Anonymous(x) -> Dubitable(x))\nforall x (Plushy(x) -> Dubitable(x))\n\nnot Titulary(katha)\n\nBackhand(katha) and forall x (Backhand(x) -> Titulary(x)) -> therefore Titulary(katha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Athene is not benighted. Athene is beakless. Sawyere is opportune. Sawyere is beakless. Sawyere is pinnated. Sawyere is brazen. Kelcy is headfirst. Kelcy is benighted. Kelcy is pinnated. Kelcy is brazen. Wittie is opportune. Wittie is beakless. Furry things are opportune. If something is opportune then it is angolan. All opportune, headfirst things are angolan. If something is beakless and not benighted then it is brazen. Furry, angolan things are beakless. All brazen things are pinnated. If something is benighted and not brazen then it is pinnated. All angolan things are pinnated. Wittie is pinnated.", "logic": "\nnot Benighted(athene)\nBeakless(athene)\nOpportune(sawyere)\nBeakless(sawyere)\nPinnated(sawyere)\nBrazen(sawyere)\nHeadfirst(kelcy)\nBenighted(kelcy)\nPinnated(kelcy)\nBrazen(kelcy)\nOpportune(wittie)\nBeakless(wittie)\nforall x (Headfirst(x) -> Opportune(x))\nforall x (Opportune(x) -> Angolan(x))\nforall x (Opportune(x) and Headfirst(x) -> Angolan(x))\nforall x (Beakless(x) and not Benighted(x) -> Brazen(x))\nforall x (Headfirst(x) and Angolan(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Pinnated(x))\nforall x (Benighted(x) and not Brazen(x) -> Pinnated(x))\nforall x (Angolan(x) -> Pinnated(x))\n\nPinnated(wittie)\n\nOpportune(wittie) and forall x (Opportune(x) -> Angolan(x)) -> therefore Angolan(wittie) Angolan(wittie) and forall x (Angolan(x) -> Pinnated(x)) -> therefore Pinnated(wittie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Eugenia is not celiac. Eugenia is beneficed. Tanny is boskopoid. Tanny is beneficed. Tanny is snub. Tanny is wretched. Zonnya is floodlit. Zonnya is celiac. Zonnya is snub. Zonnya is wretched. Kathie is boskopoid. Kathie is beneficed. Furry things are boskopoid. If something is boskopoid then it is sickish. All boskopoid, floodlit things are sickish. If something is beneficed and not celiac then it is wretched. Furry, sickish things are beneficed. All wretched things are snub. If something is celiac and not wretched then it is snub. All sickish things are snub. Zonnya is not sickish.", "logic": "\nnot Celiac(eugenia)\nBeneficed(eugenia)\nBoskopoid(tanny)\nBeneficed(tanny)\nSnub(tanny)\nWretched(tanny)\nFloodlit(zonnya)\nCeliac(zonnya)\nSnub(zonnya)\nWretched(zonnya)\nBoskopoid(kathie)\nBeneficed(kathie)\nforall x (Floodlit(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) and Floodlit(x) -> Sickish(x))\nforall x (Beneficed(x) and not Celiac(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Floodlit(x) and Sickish(x) -> Beneficed(x))\nforall x (Wretched(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Celiac(x) and not Wretched(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Snub(x))\n\nnot Sickish(zonnya)\n\nFloodlit(zonnya) and forall x (Floodlit(x) -> Boskopoid(x)) -> therefore Boskopoid(zonnya) Boskopoid(zonnya) and forall x (Boskopoid(x) -> Sickish(x)) -> therefore Sickish(zonnya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Stew is not unquiet. Stew is finical. Carree is tricksy. Carree is finical. Carree is destined. Carree is opposite. Leilah is unshielded. Leilah is unquiet. Leilah is destined. Leilah is opposite. Anet is tricksy. Anet is finical. Furry things are tricksy. If something is tricksy then it is surprised. All tricksy, unshielded things are surprised. If something is finical and not unquiet then it is opposite. Furry, surprised things are finical. All opposite things are destined. If something is unquiet and not opposite then it is destined. All surprised things are destined. Leilah is finical.", "logic": "\nnot Unquiet(stew)\nFinical(stew)\nTricksy(carree)\nFinical(carree)\nDestined(carree)\nOpposite(carree)\nUnshielded(leilah)\nUnquiet(leilah)\nDestined(leilah)\nOpposite(leilah)\nTricksy(anet)\nFinical(anet)\nforall x (Unshielded(x) -> Tricksy(x))\nforall x (Tricksy(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Tricksy(x) and Unshielded(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Finical(x) and not Unquiet(x) -> Opposite(x))\nforall x (Unshielded(x) and Surprised(x) -> Finical(x))\nforall x (Opposite(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Unquiet(x) and not Opposite(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Surprised(x) -> Destined(x))\n\nFinical(leilah)\n\nUnshielded(leilah) and forall x (Unshielded(x) -> Tricksy(x)) -> therefore Tricksy(leilah) Tricksy(leilah) and forall x (Tricksy(x) -> Surprised(x)) -> therefore Surprised(leilah) Unshielded(leilah) and Surprised(leilah) and forall x (Unshielded(x) and Surprised(x) -> Finical(x)) -> therefore Finical(leilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Shelia is not backmost. Shelia is curvaceous. Malcah is intruding. Malcah is curvaceous. Malcah is impassive. Malcah is swishy. Bernice is ducal. Bernice is backmost. Bernice is impassive. Bernice is swishy. Consuelo is intruding. Consuelo is curvaceous. Furry things are intruding. If something is intruding then it is voltarian. All intruding, ducal things are voltarian. If something is curvaceous and not backmost then it is swishy. Furry, voltarian things are curvaceous. All swishy things are impassive. If something is backmost and not swishy then it is impassive. All voltarian things are impassive. Bernice is not curvaceous.", "logic": "\nnot Backmost(shelia)\nCurvaceous(shelia)\nIntruding(malcah)\nCurvaceous(malcah)\nImpassive(malcah)\nSwishy(malcah)\nDucal(bernice)\nBackmost(bernice)\nImpassive(bernice)\nSwishy(bernice)\nIntruding(consuelo)\nCurvaceous(consuelo)\nforall x (Ducal(x) -> Intruding(x))\nforall x (Intruding(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Intruding(x) and Ducal(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) and not Backmost(x) -> Swishy(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) and Voltarian(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\nforall x (Swishy(x) -> Impassive(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) and not Swishy(x) -> Impassive(x))\nforall x (Voltarian(x) -> Impassive(x))\n\nnot Curvaceous(bernice)\n\nDucal(bernice) and forall x (Ducal(x) -> Intruding(x)) -> therefore Intruding(bernice) Intruding(bernice) and forall x (Intruding(x) -> Voltarian(x)) -> therefore Voltarian(bernice) Ducal(bernice) and Voltarian(bernice) and forall x (Ducal(x) and Voltarian(x) -> Curvaceous(x)) -> therefore Curvaceous(bernice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Hamnet is not intuitive. Hamnet is deficient. Maurine is unhatched. Maurine is deficient. Maurine is coaxing. Maurine is advertent. Alexine is erratic. Alexine is intuitive. Alexine is coaxing. Alexine is advertent. Glyn is unhatched. Glyn is deficient. Furry things are unhatched. If something is unhatched then it is rivalrous. All unhatched, erratic things are rivalrous. If something is deficient and not intuitive then it is advertent. Furry, rivalrous things are deficient. All advertent things are coaxing. If something is intuitive and not advertent then it is coaxing. All rivalrous things are coaxing. Glyn is not advertent.", "logic": "\nnot Intuitive(hamnet)\nDeficient(hamnet)\nUnhatched(maurine)\nDeficient(maurine)\nCoaxing(maurine)\nAdvertent(maurine)\nErratic(alexine)\nIntuitive(alexine)\nCoaxing(alexine)\nAdvertent(alexine)\nUnhatched(glyn)\nDeficient(glyn)\nforall x (Erratic(x) -> Unhatched(x))\nforall x (Unhatched(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nforall x (Unhatched(x) and Erratic(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nforall x (Deficient(x) and not Intuitive(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Erratic(x) and Rivalrous(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> Coaxing(x))\nforall x (Intuitive(x) and not Advertent(x) -> Coaxing(x))\nforall x (Rivalrous(x) -> Coaxing(x))\n\nnot Advertent(glyn)\n\nforall x (Deficient(x) and not Intuitive(x) -> Advertent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Tanner is not hammered. Tanner is straggling. Heath is meticulous. Heath is straggling. Heath is lewd. Heath is belted. Nannie is loony. Nannie is hammered. Nannie is lewd. Nannie is belted. Smith is meticulous. Smith is straggling. Furry things are meticulous. If something is meticulous then it is xlvii. All meticulous, loony things are xlvii. If something is straggling and not hammered then it is belted. Furry, xlvii things are straggling. All belted things are lewd. If something is hammered and not belted then it is lewd. All xlvii things are lewd. Tanner is xlvii.", "logic": "\nnot Hammered(tanner)\nStraggling(tanner)\nMeticulous(heath)\nStraggling(heath)\nLewd(heath)\nBelted(heath)\nLoony(nannie)\nHammered(nannie)\nLewd(nannie)\nBelted(nannie)\nMeticulous(smith)\nStraggling(smith)\nforall x (Loony(x) -> Meticulous(x))\nforall x (Meticulous(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Meticulous(x) and Loony(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Straggling(x) and not Hammered(x) -> Belted(x))\nforall x (Loony(x) and Xlvii(x) -> Straggling(x))\nforall x (Belted(x) -> Lewd(x))\nforall x (Hammered(x) and not Belted(x) -> Lewd(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Lewd(x))\n\nXlvii(tanner)\n\nforall x (Meticulous(x) -> Xlvii(x)) <- forall x (Loony(x) -> Meticulous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Jocelin is not medullary. Jocelin is blanched. Corina is glutinous. Corina is blanched. Corina is rewarding. Corina is shackled. Zedekiah is unearthly. Zedekiah is medullary. Zedekiah is rewarding. Zedekiah is shackled. Yves is glutinous. Yves is blanched. Furry things are glutinous. If something is glutinous then it is inertial. All glutinous, unearthly things are inertial. If something is blanched and not medullary then it is shackled. Furry, inertial things are blanched. All shackled things are rewarding. If something is medullary and not shackled then it is rewarding. All inertial things are rewarding. Jocelin is not glutinous.", "logic": "\nnot Medullary(jocelin)\nBlanched(jocelin)\nGlutinous(corina)\nBlanched(corina)\nRewarding(corina)\nShackled(corina)\nUnearthly(zedekiah)\nMedullary(zedekiah)\nRewarding(zedekiah)\nShackled(zedekiah)\nGlutinous(yves)\nBlanched(yves)\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> Glutinous(x))\nforall x (Glutinous(x) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Glutinous(x) and Unearthly(x) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Blanched(x) and not Medullary(x) -> Shackled(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) and Inertial(x) -> Blanched(x))\nforall x (Shackled(x) -> Rewarding(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) and not Shackled(x) -> Rewarding(x))\nforall x (Inertial(x) -> Rewarding(x))\n\nnot Glutinous(jocelin)\n\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> Glutinous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Charyl is not sightly. Charyl is jainist. Leopold is disabused. Leopold is jainist. Leopold is smudgy. Leopold is masonic. Yovonnda is finer. Yovonnda is sightly. Yovonnda is smudgy. Yovonnda is masonic. Hirsch is disabused. Hirsch is jainist. Furry things are disabused. If something is disabused then it is exogamous. All disabused, finer things are exogamous. If something is jainist and not sightly then it is masonic. Furry, exogamous things are jainist. All masonic things are smudgy. If something is sightly and not masonic then it is smudgy. All exogamous things are smudgy. Leopold is finer.", "logic": "\nnot Sightly(charyl)\nJainist(charyl)\nDisabused(leopold)\nJainist(leopold)\nSmudgy(leopold)\nMasonic(leopold)\nFiner(yovonnda)\nSightly(yovonnda)\nSmudgy(yovonnda)\nMasonic(yovonnda)\nDisabused(hirsch)\nJainist(hirsch)\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Disabused(x))\nforall x (Disabused(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nforall x (Disabused(x) and Finer(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nforall x (Jainist(x) and not Sightly(x) -> Masonic(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) and Exogamous(x) -> Jainist(x))\nforall x (Masonic(x) -> Smudgy(x))\nforall x (Sightly(x) and not Masonic(x) -> Smudgy(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) -> Smudgy(x))\n\nFiner(leopold)\n\nFiner(leopold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Sidonia is not screechy. Sidonia is prolix. Ketti is sturdy. Ketti is prolix. Ketti is unfixed. Ketti is pyrogallic. Shawn is acinar. Shawn is screechy. Shawn is unfixed. Shawn is pyrogallic. Fey is sturdy. Fey is prolix. Furry things are sturdy. If something is sturdy then it is stalwart. All sturdy, acinar things are stalwart. If something is prolix and not screechy then it is pyrogallic. Furry, stalwart things are prolix. All pyrogallic things are unfixed. If something is screechy and not pyrogallic then it is unfixed. All stalwart things are unfixed. Fey is not acinar.", "logic": "\nnot Screechy(sidonia)\nProlix(sidonia)\nSturdy(ketti)\nProlix(ketti)\nUnfixed(ketti)\nPyrogallic(ketti)\nAcinar(shawn)\nScreechy(shawn)\nUnfixed(shawn)\nPyrogallic(shawn)\nSturdy(fey)\nProlix(fey)\nforall x (Acinar(x) -> Sturdy(x))\nforall x (Sturdy(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nforall x (Sturdy(x) and Acinar(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nforall x (Prolix(x) and not Screechy(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Acinar(x) and Stalwart(x) -> Prolix(x))\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Screechy(x) and not Pyrogallic(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Stalwart(x) -> Unfixed(x))\n\nnot Acinar(fey)\n\nnot Acinar(fey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Wain is not alternate. Wain is afloat. Tisha is erose. Tisha is afloat. Tisha is quixotic. Tisha is diverging. Maxie is autogenic. Maxie is alternate. Maxie is quixotic. Maxie is diverging. Ragnhild is erose. Ragnhild is afloat. Furry things are erose. If something is erose then it is detergent. All erose, autogenic things are detergent. If something is afloat and not alternate then it is diverging. Furry, detergent things are afloat. All diverging things are quixotic. If something is alternate and not diverging then it is quixotic. All detergent things are quixotic. Ragnhild is alternate.", "logic": "\nnot Alternate(wain)\nAfloat(wain)\nErose(tisha)\nAfloat(tisha)\nQuixotic(tisha)\nDiverging(tisha)\nAutogenic(maxie)\nAlternate(maxie)\nQuixotic(maxie)\nDiverging(maxie)\nErose(ragnhild)\nAfloat(ragnhild)\nforall x (Autogenic(x) -> Erose(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) and Autogenic(x) -> Detergent(x))\nforall x (Afloat(x) and not Alternate(x) -> Diverging(x))\nforall x (Autogenic(x) and Detergent(x) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Diverging(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Alternate(x) and not Diverging(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Detergent(x) -> Quixotic(x))\n\nAlternate(ragnhild)\n\nAlternate(ragnhild) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Abra is not evoked. Abra is mineral. Alta is regnant. Alta is mineral. Alta is adducent. Alta is stooping. Carlie is eared. Carlie is evoked. Carlie is adducent. Carlie is stooping. Herve is regnant. Herve is mineral. Furry things are regnant. If something is regnant then it is briton. All regnant, eared things are briton. If something is mineral and not evoked then it is stooping. Furry, briton things are mineral. All stooping things are adducent. If something is evoked and not stooping then it is adducent. All briton things are adducent. Abra is not eared.", "logic": "\nnot Evoked(abra)\nMineral(abra)\nRegnant(alta)\nMineral(alta)\nAdducent(alta)\nStooping(alta)\nEared(carlie)\nEvoked(carlie)\nAdducent(carlie)\nStooping(carlie)\nRegnant(herve)\nMineral(herve)\nforall x (Eared(x) -> Regnant(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) -> Briton(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Eared(x) -> Briton(x))\nforall x (Mineral(x) and not Evoked(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Eared(x) and Briton(x) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Stooping(x) -> Adducent(x))\nforall x (Evoked(x) and not Stooping(x) -> Adducent(x))\nforall x (Briton(x) -> Adducent(x))\n\nnot Eared(abra)\n\nnot Eared(abra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Wilburt is not wisplike. Wilburt is isentropic. Tabbitha is beguiled. Tabbitha is isentropic. Tabbitha is lite. Tabbitha is four. Darcee is tempering. Darcee is wisplike. Darcee is lite. Darcee is four. Carmelle is beguiled. Carmelle is isentropic. Furry things are beguiled. If something is beguiled then it is american. All beguiled, tempering things are american. If something is isentropic and not wisplike then it is four. Furry, american things are isentropic. All four things are lite. If something is wisplike and not four then it is lite. All american things are lite. Tabbitha is wisplike.", "logic": "\nnot Wisplike(wilburt)\nIsentropic(wilburt)\nBeguiled(tabbitha)\nIsentropic(tabbitha)\nLite(tabbitha)\nFour(tabbitha)\nTempering(darcee)\nWisplike(darcee)\nLite(darcee)\nFour(darcee)\nBeguiled(carmelle)\nIsentropic(carmelle)\nforall x (Tempering(x) -> Beguiled(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) -> American(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) and Tempering(x) -> American(x))\nforall x (Isentropic(x) and not Wisplike(x) -> Four(x))\nforall x (Tempering(x) and American(x) -> Isentropic(x))\nforall x (Four(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Wisplike(x) and not Four(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (American(x) -> Lite(x))\n\nWisplike(tabbitha)\n\nWisplike(tabbitha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1306"} {"premises": "Rik is american. Felipe is blae. Shurlock is sagging. Noreen is alienable. If something is blae then it is revertible. Green things are orphaned. All alienable things are blae. Shurlock is sagging.", "logic": "\nAmerican(rik)\nBlae(felipe)\nSagging(shurlock)\nAlienable(noreen)\nforall x (Blae(x) -> Revertible(x))\nforall x (Revertible(x) -> Orphaned(x))\nforall x (Alienable(x) -> Blae(x))\n\nSagging(shurlock)\n\ntherefore Sagging(shurlock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Elnora is canonic. Portia is mingy. Min is hooved. Ulrick is bovid. If something is mingy then it is streaky. Green things are dank. All bovid things are mingy. Ulrick is not bovid.", "logic": "\nCanonic(elnora)\nMingy(portia)\nHooved(min)\nBovid(ulrick)\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> Streaky(x))\nforall x (Streaky(x) -> Dank(x))\nforall x (Bovid(x) -> Mingy(x))\n\nnot Bovid(ulrick)\n\ntherefore Bovid(ulrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Roslyn is dandyish. Paddie is unwed. Tybie is unhallowed. Beret is ebionite. If something is unwed then it is elect. Green things are separative. All ebionite things are unwed. Paddie is elect.", "logic": "\nDandyish(roslyn)\nUnwed(paddie)\nUnhallowed(tybie)\nEbionite(beret)\nforall x (Unwed(x) -> Elect(x))\nforall x (Elect(x) -> Separative(x))\nforall x (Ebionite(x) -> Unwed(x))\n\nElect(paddie)\n\nUnwed(paddie) and forall x (Unwed(x) -> Elect(x)) -> therefore Elect(paddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Moise is both. Clayborn is allotropic. Daphna is corpulent. Marlon is tingling. If something is allotropic then it is overdone. Green things are jamaican. All tingling things are allotropic. Marlon is not allotropic.", "logic": "\nBoth(moise)\nAllotropic(clayborn)\nCorpulent(daphna)\nTingling(marlon)\nforall x (Allotropic(x) -> Overdone(x))\nforall x (Overdone(x) -> Jamaican(x))\nforall x (Tingling(x) -> Allotropic(x))\n\nnot Allotropic(marlon)\n\nTingling(marlon) and forall x (Tingling(x) -> Allotropic(x)) -> therefore Allotropic(marlon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Tara is odorous. Kaylyn is wayward. Rustin is sinewy. Warren is nuptial. If something is wayward then it is moonless. Green things are bally. All nuptial things are wayward. Kaylyn is bally.", "logic": "\nOdorous(tara)\nWayward(kaylyn)\nSinewy(rustin)\nNuptial(warren)\nforall x (Wayward(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (Moonless(x) -> Bally(x))\nforall x (Nuptial(x) -> Wayward(x))\n\nBally(kaylyn)\n\nWayward(kaylyn) and forall x (Wayward(x) -> Moonless(x)) -> therefore Moonless(kaylyn) Moonless(kaylyn) and forall x (Moonless(x) -> Bally(x)) -> therefore Bally(kaylyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Heath is flyspeck. Mareah is icteric. Walther is bisulcate. Edeline is syrian. If something is icteric then it is nontoxic. Green things are impellent. All syrian things are icteric. Edeline is not nontoxic.", "logic": "\nFlyspeck(heath)\nIcteric(mareah)\nBisulcate(walther)\nSyrian(edeline)\nforall x (Icteric(x) -> Nontoxic(x))\nforall x (Nontoxic(x) -> Impellent(x))\nforall x (Syrian(x) -> Icteric(x))\n\nnot Nontoxic(edeline)\n\nSyrian(edeline) and forall x (Syrian(x) -> Icteric(x)) -> therefore Icteric(edeline) Icteric(edeline) and forall x (Icteric(x) -> Nontoxic(x)) -> therefore Nontoxic(edeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Gaven is covert. Staffard is exterior. Kirbee is impossible. Terrell is unskillful. If something is exterior then it is slack. Green things are gestural. All unskillful things are exterior. Terrell is gestural.", "logic": "\nCovert(gaven)\nExterior(staffard)\nImpossible(kirbee)\nUnskillful(terrell)\nforall x (Exterior(x) -> Slack(x))\nforall x (Slack(x) -> Gestural(x))\nforall x (Unskillful(x) -> Exterior(x))\n\nGestural(terrell)\n\nUnskillful(terrell) and forall x (Unskillful(x) -> Exterior(x)) -> therefore Exterior(terrell) Exterior(terrell) and forall x (Exterior(x) -> Slack(x)) -> therefore Slack(terrell) Slack(terrell) and forall x (Slack(x) -> Gestural(x)) -> therefore Gestural(terrell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Rafa is sexist. Kostas is unchaste. Maison is roiled. Laird is odorless. If something is unchaste then it is corporal. Green things are implacable. All odorless things are unchaste. Laird is not implacable.", "logic": "\nSexist(rafa)\nUnchaste(kostas)\nRoiled(maison)\nOdorless(laird)\nforall x (Unchaste(x) -> Corporal(x))\nforall x (Corporal(x) -> Implacable(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> Unchaste(x))\n\nnot Implacable(laird)\n\nOdorless(laird) and forall x (Odorless(x) -> Unchaste(x)) -> therefore Unchaste(laird) Unchaste(laird) and forall x (Unchaste(x) -> Corporal(x)) -> therefore Corporal(laird) Corporal(laird) and forall x (Corporal(x) -> Implacable(x)) -> therefore Implacable(laird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Tobie is fringy. Robena is unfair. Federico is bedaubed. Burt is bicorned. If something is unfair then it is flat. Green things are sinewy. All bicorned things are unfair. Federico is not unfair.", "logic": "\nFringy(tobie)\nUnfair(robena)\nBedaubed(federico)\nBicorned(burt)\nforall x (Unfair(x) -> Flat(x))\nforall x (Flat(x) -> Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Bicorned(x) -> Unfair(x))\n\nnot Unfair(federico)\n\nforall x (Bicorned(x) -> Unfair(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Joel is sleety. Eilis is vaporish. Rahul is amitotic. Liana is impendent. If something is vaporish then it is actuating. Green things are scrawny. All impendent things are vaporish. Joel is scrawny.", "logic": "\nSleety(joel)\nVaporish(eilis)\nAmitotic(rahul)\nImpendent(liana)\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Actuating(x))\nforall x (Actuating(x) -> Scrawny(x))\nforall x (Impendent(x) -> Vaporish(x))\n\nScrawny(joel)\n\nforall x (Actuating(x) -> Scrawny(x)) <- forall x (Vaporish(x) -> Actuating(x)) <- forall x (Impendent(x) -> Vaporish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Demetri is furnished. Aurel is alike. Norman is brickly. Annadiana is acrid. If something is alike then it is algonkian. Green things are underclass. All acrid things are alike. Demetri is not algonkian.", "logic": "\nFurnished(demetri)\nAlike(aurel)\nBrickly(norman)\nAcrid(annadiana)\nforall x (Alike(x) -> Algonkian(x))\nforall x (Algonkian(x) -> Underclass(x))\nforall x (Acrid(x) -> Alike(x))\n\nnot Algonkian(demetri)\n\nforall x (Alike(x) -> Algonkian(x)) <- forall x (Acrid(x) -> Alike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Freddy is buttonlike. Violetta is crafty. Shandra is monogenic. Maynord is saprozoic. If something is crafty then it is ischemic. Green things are astigmatic. All saprozoic things are crafty. Shandra is astigmatic.", "logic": "\nButtonlike(freddy)\nCrafty(violetta)\nMonogenic(shandra)\nSaprozoic(maynord)\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> Ischemic(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) -> Astigmatic(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) -> Crafty(x))\n\nAstigmatic(shandra)\n\nforall x (Ischemic(x) -> Astigmatic(x)) <- forall x (Crafty(x) -> Ischemic(x)) <- forall x (Saprozoic(x) -> Crafty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Fawne is flowerless. Darius is amylaceous. Urbain is professed. Dede is deprived. If something is amylaceous then it is invisible. Green things are uncropped. All deprived things are amylaceous. Darius is not flowerless.", "logic": "\nFlowerless(fawne)\nAmylaceous(darius)\nProfessed(urbain)\nDeprived(dede)\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) -> Invisible(x))\nforall x (Invisible(x) -> Uncropped(x))\nforall x (Deprived(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\n\nnot Flowerless(darius)\n\nnot Flowerless(darius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Uriel is haemal. Allison is filariid. Vincents is cornish. Rosabel is electoral. If something is filariid then it is helical. Green things are hinder. All electoral things are filariid. Uriel is blue.", "logic": "\nHaemal(uriel)\nFilariid(allison)\nCornish(vincents)\nElectoral(rosabel)\nforall x (Filariid(x) -> Helical(x))\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Hinder(x))\nforall x (Electoral(x) -> Filariid(x))\n\nBlue(uriel)\n\nBlue(uriel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Earl is ironlike. Tailor is artificial. Brenn is taoist. Nannette is riddled. If something is artificial then it is ibsenian. Green things are panicled. All riddled things are artificial. Brenn is not ironlike.", "logic": "\nIronlike(earl)\nArtificial(tailor)\nTaoist(brenn)\nRiddled(nannette)\nforall x (Artificial(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Panicled(x))\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> Artificial(x))\n\nnot Ironlike(brenn)\n\nnot Ironlike(brenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Stacy is demulcent. Angy is damn. Garret is biennial. Toma is basipetal. If something is damn then it is alacritous. Green things are unalarming. All basipetal things are damn. Garret is blue.", "logic": "\nDemulcent(stacy)\nDamn(angy)\nBiennial(garret)\nBasipetal(toma)\nforall x (Damn(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) -> Unalarming(x))\nforall x (Basipetal(x) -> Damn(x))\n\nBlue(garret)\n\nBlue(garret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-561"} {"premises": "Florencia is fetal. Florencia is caudated. Florencia is practical. Florencia is trilled. Florencia is african. Tobin is fetal. Tobin is striped. Tobin is practical. Tobin is trilled. Tobin is exilic. Tobin is african. Tommy is fetal. Tommy is caudated. Tommy is striped. Tommy is african. All african, caudated people are trilled. Tobin is trilled.", "logic": "\nFetal(florencia)\nCaudated(florencia)\nPractical(florencia)\nTrilled(florencia)\nAfrican(florencia)\nFetal(tobin)\nStriped(tobin)\nPractical(tobin)\nTrilled(tobin)\nExilic(tobin)\nAfrican(tobin)\nFetal(tommy)\nCaudated(tommy)\nStriped(tommy)\nAfrican(tommy)\nforall x (African(x) and Caudated(x) -> Trilled(x))\n\nTrilled(tobin)\n\ntherefore Trilled(tobin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "Godard is doleful. Godard is robotic. Godard is nutritive. Godard is hipped. Godard is penumbral. Maxie is doleful. Maxie is caesarian. Maxie is nutritive. Maxie is hipped. Maxie is biparous. Maxie is penumbral. Bernhard is doleful. Bernhard is robotic. Bernhard is caesarian. Bernhard is penumbral. All penumbral, robotic people are hipped. Bernhard is not caesarian.", "logic": "\nDoleful(godard)\nRobotic(godard)\nNutritive(godard)\nHipped(godard)\nPenumbral(godard)\nDoleful(maxie)\nCaesarian(maxie)\nNutritive(maxie)\nHipped(maxie)\nBiparous(maxie)\nPenumbral(maxie)\nDoleful(bernhard)\nRobotic(bernhard)\nCaesarian(bernhard)\nPenumbral(bernhard)\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and Robotic(x) -> Hipped(x))\n\nnot Caesarian(bernhard)\n\ntherefore Caesarian(bernhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "Cassy is cogitable. Cassy is essential. Cassy is stressful. Cassy is piebald. Cassy is gnostic. Joyann is cogitable. Joyann is avaricious. Joyann is stressful. Joyann is piebald. Joyann is squiffy. Joyann is gnostic. Zane is cogitable. Zane is essential. Zane is avaricious. Zane is gnostic. All gnostic, essential people are piebald. Zane is piebald.", "logic": "\nCogitable(cassy)\nEssential(cassy)\nStressful(cassy)\nPiebald(cassy)\nGnostic(cassy)\nCogitable(joyann)\nAvaricious(joyann)\nStressful(joyann)\nPiebald(joyann)\nSquiffy(joyann)\nGnostic(joyann)\nCogitable(zane)\nEssential(zane)\nAvaricious(zane)\nGnostic(zane)\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Essential(x) -> Piebald(x))\n\nPiebald(zane)\n\nGnostic(zane) and Essential(zane) and forall x (Gnostic(x) and Essential(x) -> Piebald(x)) -> therefore Piebald(zane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "Jillana is ninetieth. Jillana is ameban. Jillana is stative. Jillana is flavorous. Jillana is ascending. Camille is ninetieth. Camille is epiphysial. Camille is stative. Camille is flavorous. Camille is peritoneal. Camille is ascending. Stephan is ninetieth. Stephan is ameban. Stephan is epiphysial. Stephan is ascending. All ascending, ameban people are flavorous. Stephan is not flavorous.", "logic": "\nNinetieth(jillana)\nAmeban(jillana)\nStative(jillana)\nFlavorous(jillana)\nAscending(jillana)\nNinetieth(camille)\nEpiphysial(camille)\nStative(camille)\nFlavorous(camille)\nPeritoneal(camille)\nAscending(camille)\nNinetieth(stephan)\nAmeban(stephan)\nEpiphysial(stephan)\nAscending(stephan)\nforall x (Ascending(x) and Ameban(x) -> Flavorous(x))\n\nnot Flavorous(stephan)\n\nAscending(stephan) and Ameban(stephan) and forall x (Ascending(x) and Ameban(x) -> Flavorous(x)) -> therefore Flavorous(stephan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "Cordelia is hanoverian. Cordelia is genteel. Cordelia is curvaceous. Cordelia is confutable. Cordelia is frowsy. Brice is hanoverian. Brice is ecumenic. Brice is curvaceous. Brice is confutable. Brice is perennial. Brice is frowsy. Brianna is hanoverian. Brianna is genteel. Brianna is ecumenic. Brianna is frowsy. All frowsy, genteel people are confutable. Brianna is not perennial.", "logic": "\nHanoverian(cordelia)\nGenteel(cordelia)\nCurvaceous(cordelia)\nConfutable(cordelia)\nFrowsy(cordelia)\nHanoverian(brice)\nEcumenic(brice)\nCurvaceous(brice)\nConfutable(brice)\nPerennial(brice)\nFrowsy(brice)\nHanoverian(brianna)\nGenteel(brianna)\nEcumenic(brianna)\nFrowsy(brianna)\nforall x (Frowsy(x) and Genteel(x) -> Confutable(x))\n\nnot Perennial(brianna)\n\nnot Perennial(brianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "Bridgette is crashing. Bridgette is profitless. Bridgette is sarcosomal. Bridgette is muffled. Bridgette is enlivened. Corella is crashing. Corella is unexplored. Corella is sarcosomal. Corella is muffled. Corella is avid. Corella is enlivened. Deborah is crashing. Deborah is profitless. Deborah is unexplored. Deborah is enlivened. All enlivened, profitless people are muffled. Bridgette is avid.", "logic": "\nCrashing(bridgette)\nProfitless(bridgette)\nSarcosomal(bridgette)\nMuffled(bridgette)\nEnlivened(bridgette)\nCrashing(corella)\nUnexplored(corella)\nSarcosomal(corella)\nMuffled(corella)\nAvid(corella)\nEnlivened(corella)\nCrashing(deborah)\nProfitless(deborah)\nUnexplored(deborah)\nEnlivened(deborah)\nforall x (Enlivened(x) and Profitless(x) -> Muffled(x))\n\nAvid(bridgette)\n\nAvid(bridgette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "Arleen is coital. Arleen is motiveless. Arleen is synaptic. Arleen is stubborn. Arleen is unexceeded. Correna is coital. Correna is palatable. Correna is synaptic. Correna is stubborn. Correna is homogenous. Correna is unexceeded. Othello is coital. Othello is motiveless. Othello is palatable. Othello is unexceeded. All unexceeded, motiveless people are stubborn. Othello is not synaptic.", "logic": "\nCoital(arleen)\nMotiveless(arleen)\nSynaptic(arleen)\nStubborn(arleen)\nUnexceeded(arleen)\nCoital(correna)\nPalatable(correna)\nSynaptic(correna)\nStubborn(correna)\nHomogenous(correna)\nUnexceeded(correna)\nCoital(othello)\nMotiveless(othello)\nPalatable(othello)\nUnexceeded(othello)\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) and Motiveless(x) -> Stubborn(x))\n\nnot Synaptic(othello)\n\nnot Synaptic(othello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "Babita is sumptuous. Babita is optical. Babita is stressful. Babita is graded. Babita is oecumenic. Darcie is sumptuous. Darcie is discalced. Darcie is stressful. Darcie is graded. Darcie is couthy. Darcie is oecumenic. Angelina is sumptuous. Angelina is optical. Angelina is discalced. Angelina is oecumenic. All oecumenic, optical people are graded. Darcie is optical.", "logic": "\nSumptuous(babita)\nOptical(babita)\nStressful(babita)\nGraded(babita)\nOecumenic(babita)\nSumptuous(darcie)\nDiscalced(darcie)\nStressful(darcie)\nGraded(darcie)\nCouthy(darcie)\nOecumenic(darcie)\nSumptuous(angelina)\nOptical(angelina)\nDiscalced(angelina)\nOecumenic(angelina)\nforall x (Oecumenic(x) and Optical(x) -> Graded(x))\n\nOptical(darcie)\n\nOptical(darcie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2091"} {"premises": "The worden is tatty. The worden is swimming. The worden is not modified. The worden weld the dante. The worden devote the dante. The dante is extensile. The dante is modified. The dante is malleable. The dante does not like the worden. The dante golf the worden. If someone is modified then they visit the worden. If someone devote the worden then they like the dante. If someone weld the dante then they see the dante. If someone is modified then they visit the dante. If someone devote the worden then they are swimming. If someone weld the dante and the dante devote the worden then they see the worden. If someone golf the dante and the dante devote the worden then the worden devote the dante. If someone golf the dante and the dante does not see the worden then the worden does not see the dante. The worden is swimming.", "logic": "\nTatty(worden)\nSwimming(worden)\nnot Modified(worden)\nWeld(worden, dante)\nDevote(worden, dante)\nExtensile(dante)\nModified(dante)\nMalleable(dante)\nnot Weld(dante, worden)\nGolf(dante, worden)\nforall x (Modified(x) -> Devote(x, worden))\nforall x (Devote(x, worden) -> Weld(x, dante))\nforall x (Weld(x, dante) -> Golf(x, dante))\nforall x (Modified(x) -> Devote(x, dante))\nforall x (Devote(x, worden) -> Swimming(x))\nforall x (Weld(x, dante) and Devote(dante, worden) -> Golf(x, worden))\nforall x (Golf(x, dante) and Devote(dante, worden) -> Devote(worden, dante))\nforall x (Golf(x, dante) and not Golf(dante, worden) -> not Golf(worden, dante))\n\nSwimming(worden)\n\ntherefore Swimming(worden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The dael is ireful. The dael is treelike. The dael is not used. The dael engrave the valeda. The dael padlock the valeda. The valeda is untruthful. The valeda is used. The valeda is shrewish. The valeda does not like the dael. The valeda gibe the dael. If someone is used then they visit the dael. If someone padlock the dael then they like the valeda. If someone engrave the valeda then they see the valeda. If someone is used then they visit the valeda. If someone padlock the dael then they are treelike. If someone engrave the valeda and the valeda padlock the dael then they see the dael. If someone gibe the valeda and the valeda padlock the dael then the dael padlock the valeda. If someone gibe the valeda and the valeda does not see the dael then the dael does not see the valeda. The dael is not ireful.", "logic": "\nIreful(dael)\nTreelike(dael)\nnot Used(dael)\nEngrave(dael, valeda)\nPadlock(dael, valeda)\nUntruthful(valeda)\nUsed(valeda)\nShrewish(valeda)\nnot Engrave(valeda, dael)\nGibe(valeda, dael)\nforall x (Used(x) -> Padlock(x, dael))\nforall x (Padlock(x, dael) -> Engrave(x, valeda))\nforall x (Engrave(x, valeda) -> Gibe(x, valeda))\nforall x (Used(x) -> Padlock(x, valeda))\nforall x (Padlock(x, dael) -> Treelike(x))\nforall x (Engrave(x, valeda) and Padlock(valeda, dael) -> Gibe(x, dael))\nforall x (Gibe(x, valeda) and Padlock(valeda, dael) -> Padlock(dael, valeda))\nforall x (Gibe(x, valeda) and not Gibe(valeda, dael) -> not Gibe(dael, valeda))\n\nnot Ireful(dael)\n\ntherefore Ireful(dael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The andreana is outdoor. The andreana is capitular. The andreana is not seventh. The andreana hiccough the nanine. The andreana jack the nanine. The nanine is helpless. The nanine is seventh. The nanine is precedent. The nanine does not like the andreana. The nanine mulct the andreana. If someone is seventh then they visit the andreana. If someone jack the andreana then they like the nanine. If someone hiccough the nanine then they see the nanine. If someone is seventh then they visit the nanine. If someone jack the andreana then they are capitular. If someone hiccough the nanine and the nanine jack the andreana then they see the andreana. If someone mulct the nanine and the nanine jack the andreana then the andreana jack the nanine. If someone mulct the nanine and the nanine does not see the andreana then the andreana does not see the nanine. The andreana mulct the nanine.", "logic": "\nOutdoor(andreana)\nCapitular(andreana)\nnot Seventh(andreana)\nHiccough(andreana, nanine)\nJack(andreana, nanine)\nHelpless(nanine)\nSeventh(nanine)\nPrecedent(nanine)\nnot Hiccough(nanine, andreana)\nMulct(nanine, andreana)\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> Jack(x, andreana))\nforall x (Jack(x, andreana) -> Hiccough(x, nanine))\nforall x (Hiccough(x, nanine) -> Mulct(x, nanine))\nforall x (Seventh(x) -> Jack(x, nanine))\nforall x (Jack(x, andreana) -> Capitular(x))\nforall x (Hiccough(x, nanine) and Jack(nanine, andreana) -> Mulct(x, andreana))\nforall x (Mulct(x, nanine) and Jack(nanine, andreana) -> Jack(andreana, nanine))\nforall x (Mulct(x, nanine) and not Mulct(nanine, andreana) -> not Mulct(andreana, nanine))\n\nMulct(andreana, nanine)\n\nHiccough(andreana, nanine) and forall x (Hiccough(x, nanine) -> Mulct(x, nanine)) -> therefore Mulct(andreana, nanine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The romonda is asterismal. The romonda is reflex. The romonda is not outlaw. The romonda compromise the shelly. The romonda geld the shelly. The shelly is antithetic. The shelly is outlaw. The shelly is wedded. The shelly does not like the romonda. The shelly expose the romonda. If someone is outlaw then they visit the romonda. If someone geld the romonda then they like the shelly. If someone compromise the shelly then they see the shelly. If someone is outlaw then they visit the shelly. If someone geld the romonda then they are reflex. If someone compromise the shelly and the shelly geld the romonda then they see the romonda. If someone expose the shelly and the shelly geld the romonda then the romonda geld the shelly. If someone expose the shelly and the shelly does not see the romonda then the romonda does not see the shelly. The shelly does not visit the shelly.", "logic": "\nAsterismal(romonda)\nReflex(romonda)\nnot Outlaw(romonda)\nCompromise(romonda, shelly)\nGeld(romonda, shelly)\nAntithetic(shelly)\nOutlaw(shelly)\nWedded(shelly)\nnot Compromise(shelly, romonda)\nExpose(shelly, romonda)\nforall x (Outlaw(x) -> Geld(x, romonda))\nforall x (Geld(x, romonda) -> Compromise(x, shelly))\nforall x (Compromise(x, shelly) -> Expose(x, shelly))\nforall x (Outlaw(x) -> Geld(x, shelly))\nforall x (Geld(x, romonda) -> Reflex(x))\nforall x (Compromise(x, shelly) and Geld(shelly, romonda) -> Expose(x, romonda))\nforall x (Expose(x, shelly) and Geld(shelly, romonda) -> Geld(romonda, shelly))\nforall x (Expose(x, shelly) and not Expose(shelly, romonda) -> not Expose(romonda, shelly))\n\nnot Geld(shelly, shelly)\n\nOutlaw(shelly) and forall x (Outlaw(x) -> Geld(x, shelly)) -> therefore Geld(shelly, shelly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The parrnell is goddam. The parrnell is cumuliform. The parrnell is not bookable. The parrnell displace the georgena. The parrnell grunt the georgena. The georgena is sassy. The georgena is bookable. The georgena is diminutive. The georgena does not like the parrnell. The georgena parachute the parrnell. If someone is bookable then they visit the parrnell. If someone grunt the parrnell then they like the georgena. If someone displace the georgena then they see the georgena. If someone is bookable then they visit the georgena. If someone grunt the parrnell then they are cumuliform. If someone displace the georgena and the georgena grunt the parrnell then they see the parrnell. If someone parachute the georgena and the georgena grunt the parrnell then the parrnell grunt the georgena. If someone parachute the georgena and the georgena does not see the parrnell then the parrnell does not see the georgena. The georgena is cumuliform.", "logic": "\nGoddam(parrnell)\nCumuliform(parrnell)\nnot Bookable(parrnell)\nDisplace(parrnell, georgena)\nGrunt(parrnell, georgena)\nSassy(georgena)\nBookable(georgena)\nDiminutive(georgena)\nnot Displace(georgena, parrnell)\nParachute(georgena, parrnell)\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Grunt(x, parrnell))\nforall x (Grunt(x, parrnell) -> Displace(x, georgena))\nforall x (Displace(x, georgena) -> Parachute(x, georgena))\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Grunt(x, georgena))\nforall x (Grunt(x, parrnell) -> Cumuliform(x))\nforall x (Displace(x, georgena) and Grunt(georgena, parrnell) -> Parachute(x, parrnell))\nforall x (Parachute(x, georgena) and Grunt(georgena, parrnell) -> Grunt(parrnell, georgena))\nforall x (Parachute(x, georgena) and not Parachute(georgena, parrnell) -> not Parachute(parrnell, georgena))\n\nCumuliform(georgena)\n\nBookable(georgena) and forall x (Bookable(x) -> Grunt(x, parrnell)) -> therefore Grunt(georgena, parrnell) Grunt(georgena, parrnell) and forall x (Grunt(x, parrnell) -> Cumuliform(x)) -> therefore Cumuliform(georgena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The joy is tibetan. The joy is witless. The joy is not restless. The joy symmetrize the demetre. The joy romance the demetre. The demetre is shodden. The demetre is restless. The demetre is lowermost. The demetre does not like the joy. The demetre core the joy. If someone is restless then they visit the joy. If someone romance the joy then they like the demetre. If someone symmetrize the demetre then they see the demetre. If someone is restless then they visit the demetre. If someone romance the joy then they are witless. If someone symmetrize the demetre and the demetre romance the joy then they see the joy. If someone core the demetre and the demetre romance the joy then the joy romance the demetre. If someone core the demetre and the demetre does not see the joy then the joy does not see the demetre. The joy does not see the joy.", "logic": "\nTibetan(joy)\nWitless(joy)\nnot Restless(joy)\nSymmetrize(joy, demetre)\nRomance(joy, demetre)\nShodden(demetre)\nRestless(demetre)\nLowermost(demetre)\nnot Symmetrize(demetre, joy)\nCore(demetre, joy)\nforall x (Restless(x) -> Romance(x, joy))\nforall x (Romance(x, joy) -> Symmetrize(x, demetre))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, demetre) -> Core(x, demetre))\nforall x (Restless(x) -> Romance(x, demetre))\nforall x (Romance(x, joy) -> Witless(x))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, demetre) and Romance(demetre, joy) -> Core(x, joy))\nforall x (Core(x, demetre) and Romance(demetre, joy) -> Romance(joy, demetre))\nforall x (Core(x, demetre) and not Core(demetre, joy) -> not Core(joy, demetre))\n\nnot Core(joy, joy)\n\nRestless(demetre) and forall x (Restless(x) -> Romance(x, joy)) -> therefore Romance(demetre, joy) Symmetrize(joy, demetre) and Romance(demetre, joy) and forall x (Symmetrize(x, demetre) and Romance(demetre, joy) -> Core(x, joy)) -> therefore Core(joy, joy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The augie is winglike. The augie is faithful. The augie is not dreadful. The augie defoliate the nil. The augie rollick the nil. The nil is unliveried. The nil is dreadful. The nil is fortified. The nil does not like the augie. The nil billow the augie. If someone is dreadful then they visit the augie. If someone rollick the augie then they like the nil. If someone defoliate the nil then they see the nil. If someone is dreadful then they visit the nil. If someone rollick the augie then they are faithful. If someone defoliate the nil and the nil rollick the augie then they see the augie. If someone billow the nil and the nil rollick the augie then the augie rollick the nil. If someone billow the nil and the nil does not see the augie then the augie does not see the nil. The nil billow the nil.", "logic": "\nWinglike(augie)\nFaithful(augie)\nnot Dreadful(augie)\nDefoliate(augie, nil)\nRollick(augie, nil)\nUnliveried(nil)\nDreadful(nil)\nFortified(nil)\nnot Defoliate(nil, augie)\nBillow(nil, augie)\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> Rollick(x, augie))\nforall x (Rollick(x, augie) -> Defoliate(x, nil))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, nil) -> Billow(x, nil))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> Rollick(x, nil))\nforall x (Rollick(x, augie) -> Faithful(x))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, nil) and Rollick(nil, augie) -> Billow(x, augie))\nforall x (Billow(x, nil) and Rollick(nil, augie) -> Rollick(augie, nil))\nforall x (Billow(x, nil) and not Billow(nil, augie) -> not Billow(augie, nil))\n\nBillow(nil, nil)\n\nDreadful(nil) and forall x (Dreadful(x) -> Rollick(x, augie)) -> therefore Rollick(nil, augie) Rollick(nil, augie) and forall x (Rollick(x, augie) -> Defoliate(x, nil)) -> therefore Defoliate(nil, nil) Defoliate(nil, nil) and forall x (Defoliate(x, nil) -> Billow(x, nil)) -> therefore Billow(nil, nil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The dorolice is overbusy. The dorolice is endogamic. The dorolice is not blamed. The dorolice interlude the forest. The dorolice upstage the forest. The forest is colonized. The forest is blamed. The forest is engorged. The forest does not like the dorolice. The forest proceed the dorolice. If someone is blamed then they visit the dorolice. If someone upstage the dorolice then they like the forest. If someone interlude the forest then they see the forest. If someone is blamed then they visit the forest. If someone upstage the dorolice then they are endogamic. If someone interlude the forest and the forest upstage the dorolice then they see the dorolice. If someone proceed the forest and the forest upstage the dorolice then the dorolice upstage the forest. If someone proceed the forest and the forest does not see the dorolice then the dorolice does not see the forest. The forest does not see the forest.", "logic": "\nOverbusy(dorolice)\nEndogamic(dorolice)\nnot Blamed(dorolice)\nInterlude(dorolice, forest)\nUpstage(dorolice, forest)\nColonized(forest)\nBlamed(forest)\nEngorged(forest)\nnot Interlude(forest, dorolice)\nProceed(forest, dorolice)\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Upstage(x, dorolice))\nforall x (Upstage(x, dorolice) -> Interlude(x, forest))\nforall x (Interlude(x, forest) -> Proceed(x, forest))\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Upstage(x, forest))\nforall x (Upstage(x, dorolice) -> Endogamic(x))\nforall x (Interlude(x, forest) and Upstage(forest, dorolice) -> Proceed(x, dorolice))\nforall x (Proceed(x, forest) and Upstage(forest, dorolice) -> Upstage(dorolice, forest))\nforall x (Proceed(x, forest) and not Proceed(forest, dorolice) -> not Proceed(dorolice, forest))\n\nnot Proceed(forest, forest)\n\nBlamed(forest) and forall x (Blamed(x) -> Upstage(x, dorolice)) -> therefore Upstage(forest, dorolice) Upstage(forest, dorolice) and forall x (Upstage(x, dorolice) -> Interlude(x, forest)) -> therefore Interlude(forest, forest) Interlude(forest, forest) and forall x (Interlude(x, forest) -> Proceed(x, forest)) -> therefore Proceed(forest, forest)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The miguelita is unmown. The miguelita is interstate. The miguelita is not bothered. The miguelita parry the penelope. The miguelita digest the penelope. The penelope is dependable. The penelope is bothered. The penelope is patronized. The penelope does not like the miguelita. The penelope recruit the miguelita. If someone is bothered then they visit the miguelita. If someone digest the miguelita then they like the penelope. If someone parry the penelope then they see the penelope. If someone is bothered then they visit the penelope. If someone digest the miguelita then they are interstate. If someone parry the penelope and the penelope digest the miguelita then they see the miguelita. If someone recruit the penelope and the penelope digest the miguelita then the miguelita digest the penelope. If someone recruit the penelope and the penelope does not see the miguelita then the miguelita does not see the penelope. The miguelita does not visit the miguelita.", "logic": "\nUnmown(miguelita)\nInterstate(miguelita)\nnot Bothered(miguelita)\nParry(miguelita, penelope)\nDigest(miguelita, penelope)\nDependable(penelope)\nBothered(penelope)\nPatronized(penelope)\nnot Parry(penelope, miguelita)\nRecruit(penelope, miguelita)\nforall x (Bothered(x) -> Digest(x, miguelita))\nforall x (Digest(x, miguelita) -> Parry(x, penelope))\nforall x (Parry(x, penelope) -> Recruit(x, penelope))\nforall x (Bothered(x) -> Digest(x, penelope))\nforall x (Digest(x, miguelita) -> Interstate(x))\nforall x (Parry(x, penelope) and Digest(penelope, miguelita) -> Recruit(x, miguelita))\nforall x (Recruit(x, penelope) and Digest(penelope, miguelita) -> Digest(miguelita, penelope))\nforall x (Recruit(x, penelope) and not Recruit(penelope, miguelita) -> not Recruit(miguelita, penelope))\n\nnot Digest(miguelita, miguelita)\n\nforall x (Bothered(x) -> Digest(x, miguelita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The tresa is giddy. The tresa is unlettered. The tresa is not cozy. The tresa descend the gisela. The tresa mimeo the gisela. The gisela is thirteenth. The gisela is cozy. The gisela is catabolic. The gisela does not like the tresa. The gisela claret the tresa. If someone is cozy then they visit the tresa. If someone mimeo the tresa then they like the gisela. If someone descend the gisela then they see the gisela. If someone is cozy then they visit the gisela. If someone mimeo the tresa then they are unlettered. If someone descend the gisela and the gisela mimeo the tresa then they see the tresa. If someone claret the gisela and the gisela mimeo the tresa then the tresa mimeo the gisela. If someone claret the gisela and the gisela does not see the tresa then the tresa does not see the gisela. The tresa descend the tresa.", "logic": "\nGiddy(tresa)\nUnlettered(tresa)\nnot Cozy(tresa)\nDescend(tresa, gisela)\nMimeo(tresa, gisela)\nThirteenth(gisela)\nCozy(gisela)\nCatabolic(gisela)\nnot Descend(gisela, tresa)\nClaret(gisela, tresa)\nforall x (Cozy(x) -> Mimeo(x, tresa))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, tresa) -> Descend(x, gisela))\nforall x (Descend(x, gisela) -> Claret(x, gisela))\nforall x (Cozy(x) -> Mimeo(x, gisela))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, tresa) -> Unlettered(x))\nforall x (Descend(x, gisela) and Mimeo(gisela, tresa) -> Claret(x, tresa))\nforall x (Claret(x, gisela) and Mimeo(gisela, tresa) -> Mimeo(tresa, gisela))\nforall x (Claret(x, gisela) and not Claret(gisela, tresa) -> not Claret(tresa, gisela))\n\nDescend(tresa, tresa)\n\nDescend(tresa, tresa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The janeta is fatigued. The janeta is pyaemic. The janeta is not senecan. The janeta coordinate the rodolphe. The janeta secede the rodolphe. The rodolphe is dispirited. The rodolphe is senecan. The rodolphe is lemonlike. The rodolphe does not like the janeta. The rodolphe lead the janeta. If someone is senecan then they visit the janeta. If someone secede the janeta then they like the rodolphe. If someone coordinate the rodolphe then they see the rodolphe. If someone is senecan then they visit the rodolphe. If someone secede the janeta then they are pyaemic. If someone coordinate the rodolphe and the rodolphe secede the janeta then they see the janeta. If someone lead the rodolphe and the rodolphe secede the janeta then the janeta secede the rodolphe. If someone lead the rodolphe and the rodolphe does not see the janeta then the janeta does not see the rodolphe. The rodolphe is not fatigued.", "logic": "\nFatigued(janeta)\nPyaemic(janeta)\nnot Senecan(janeta)\nCoordinate(janeta, rodolphe)\nSecede(janeta, rodolphe)\nDispirited(rodolphe)\nSenecan(rodolphe)\nLemonlike(rodolphe)\nnot Coordinate(rodolphe, janeta)\nLead(rodolphe, janeta)\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Secede(x, janeta))\nforall x (Secede(x, janeta) -> Coordinate(x, rodolphe))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, rodolphe) -> Lead(x, rodolphe))\nforall x (Senecan(x) -> Secede(x, rodolphe))\nforall x (Secede(x, janeta) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, rodolphe) and Secede(rodolphe, janeta) -> Lead(x, janeta))\nforall x (Lead(x, rodolphe) and Secede(rodolphe, janeta) -> Secede(janeta, rodolphe))\nforall x (Lead(x, rodolphe) and not Lead(rodolphe, janeta) -> not Lead(janeta, rodolphe))\n\nnot Fatigued(rodolphe)\n\nnot Fatigued(rodolphe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "The deloria is stunned. The deloria is monogamous. The deloria is not indignant. The deloria quip the stephine. The deloria expend the stephine. The stephine is unfeeling. The stephine is indignant. The stephine is preferable. The stephine does not like the deloria. The stephine deactivate the deloria. If someone is indignant then they visit the deloria. If someone expend the deloria then they like the stephine. If someone quip the stephine then they see the stephine. If someone is indignant then they visit the stephine. If someone expend the deloria then they are monogamous. If someone quip the stephine and the stephine expend the deloria then they see the deloria. If someone deactivate the stephine and the stephine expend the deloria then the deloria expend the stephine. If someone deactivate the stephine and the stephine does not see the deloria then the deloria does not see the stephine. The deloria is unfeeling.", "logic": "\nStunned(deloria)\nMonogamous(deloria)\nnot Indignant(deloria)\nQuip(deloria, stephine)\nExpend(deloria, stephine)\nUnfeeling(stephine)\nIndignant(stephine)\nPreferable(stephine)\nnot Quip(stephine, deloria)\nDeactivate(stephine, deloria)\nforall x (Indignant(x) -> Expend(x, deloria))\nforall x (Expend(x, deloria) -> Quip(x, stephine))\nforall x (Quip(x, stephine) -> Deactivate(x, stephine))\nforall x (Indignant(x) -> Expend(x, stephine))\nforall x (Expend(x, deloria) -> Monogamous(x))\nforall x (Quip(x, stephine) and Expend(stephine, deloria) -> Deactivate(x, deloria))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, stephine) and Expend(stephine, deloria) -> Expend(deloria, stephine))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, stephine) and not Deactivate(stephine, deloria) -> not Deactivate(deloria, stephine))\n\nUnfeeling(deloria)\n\nUnfeeling(deloria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1381"} {"premises": "Madalena is herbaceous. Madalena is arrhythmic. Madalena is pretty. Madalena is delinquent. Madalena is smarmy. Madalena is impaired. Madalena is disorderly. If something is delinquent and herbaceous then it is pretty. If something is pretty and delinquent then it is disorderly. Nice, pretty things are disorderly. Madalena is pretty.", "logic": "\nHerbaceous(madalena)\nArrhythmic(madalena)\nPretty(madalena)\nDelinquent(madalena)\nSmarmy(madalena)\nImpaired(madalena)\nDisorderly(madalena)\nforall x (Delinquent(x) and Herbaceous(x) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (Pretty(x) and Delinquent(x) -> Disorderly(x))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) and Pretty(x) -> Disorderly(x))\n\nPretty(madalena)\n\ntherefore Pretty(madalena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4444"} {"premises": "Valenka is fatty. Valenka is systematic. Valenka is bengali. Valenka is steadying. Valenka is pierced. Valenka is subsurface. Valenka is blunted. If something is steadying and fatty then it is bengali. If something is bengali and steadying then it is blunted. Nice, bengali things are blunted. Valenka is not steadying.", "logic": "\nFatty(valenka)\nSystematic(valenka)\nBengali(valenka)\nSteadying(valenka)\nPierced(valenka)\nSubsurface(valenka)\nBlunted(valenka)\nforall x (Steadying(x) and Fatty(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) and Steadying(x) -> Blunted(x))\nforall x (Steadying(x) and Bengali(x) -> Blunted(x))\n\nnot Steadying(valenka)\n\ntherefore Steadying(valenka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4444"} {"premises": "The olivia does not visit the asia. The asia is frank. The asia is not prostrate. The asia renounce the caro. The asia enrol the lorita. The asia toot the olivia. The asia does not visit the caro. The lorita enrol the olivia. The caro toot the olivia. The caro toot the lorita. If something toot the olivia then the olivia toot the lorita. If something enrol the lorita then it renounce the olivia. If the caro enrol the olivia and the olivia is crazy then the caro is not crazy. If something enrol the olivia and it toot the lorita then the olivia does not need the lorita. If something toot the asia then it enrol the asia. If something renounce the caro then the caro toot the asia. If something toot the lorita then it is not frank. If something enrol the asia then it renounce the caro. The lorita enrol the olivia.", "logic": "\nnot Toot(olivia, asia)\nFrank(asia)\nnot Prostrate(asia)\nRenounce(asia, caro)\nEnrol(asia, lorita)\nToot(asia, olivia)\nnot Toot(asia, caro)\nEnrol(lorita, olivia)\nToot(caro, olivia)\nToot(caro, lorita)\nforall x (Toot(x, olivia) -> Toot(olivia, lorita))\nforall x (Enrol(x, lorita) -> Renounce(x, olivia))\nEnrol(caro, olivia) and Crazy(olivia) -> not Crazy(caro)\nforall x (Enrol(x, olivia) and Toot(x, lorita) -> not Renounce(olivia, lorita))\nforall x (Toot(x, asia) -> Enrol(x, asia))\nforall x (Renounce(x, caro) -> Toot(caro, asia))\nforall x (Toot(x, lorita) -> not Frank(x))\nforall x (Enrol(x, asia) -> Renounce(x, caro))\n\nEnrol(lorita, olivia)\n\ntherefore Enrol(lorita, olivia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The sylvan does not visit the warden. The warden is reformable. The warden is not guyanese. The warden ticktack the heath. The warden endeavor the elmira. The warden horrify the sylvan. The warden does not visit the heath. The elmira endeavor the sylvan. The heath horrify the sylvan. The heath horrify the elmira. If something horrify the sylvan then the sylvan horrify the elmira. If something endeavor the elmira then it ticktack the sylvan. If the heath endeavor the sylvan and the sylvan is unconfused then the heath is not unconfused. If something endeavor the sylvan and it horrify the elmira then the sylvan does not need the elmira. If something horrify the warden then it endeavor the warden. If something ticktack the heath then the heath horrify the warden. If something horrify the elmira then it is not reformable. If something endeavor the warden then it ticktack the heath. The warden does not need the heath.", "logic": "\nnot Horrify(sylvan, warden)\nReformable(warden)\nnot Guyanese(warden)\nTicktack(warden, heath)\nEndeavor(warden, elmira)\nHorrify(warden, sylvan)\nnot Horrify(warden, heath)\nEndeavor(elmira, sylvan)\nHorrify(heath, sylvan)\nHorrify(heath, elmira)\nforall x (Horrify(x, sylvan) -> Horrify(sylvan, elmira))\nforall x (Endeavor(x, elmira) -> Ticktack(x, sylvan))\nEndeavor(heath, sylvan) and Unconfused(sylvan) -> not Unconfused(heath)\nforall x (Endeavor(x, sylvan) and Horrify(x, elmira) -> not Ticktack(sylvan, elmira))\nforall x (Horrify(x, warden) -> Endeavor(x, warden))\nforall x (Ticktack(x, heath) -> Horrify(heath, warden))\nforall x (Horrify(x, elmira) -> not Reformable(x))\nforall x (Endeavor(x, warden) -> Ticktack(x, heath))\n\nnot Ticktack(warden, heath)\n\ntherefore Ticktack(warden, heath)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The selena does not visit the consolata. The consolata is rotatory. The consolata is not abranchial. The consolata cutinize the germana. The consolata tourney the celestina. The consolata summarize the selena. The consolata does not visit the germana. The celestina tourney the selena. The germana summarize the selena. The germana summarize the celestina. If something summarize the selena then the selena summarize the celestina. If something tourney the celestina then it cutinize the selena. If the germana tourney the selena and the selena is boney then the germana is not boney. If something tourney the selena and it summarize the celestina then the selena does not need the celestina. If something summarize the consolata then it tourney the consolata. If something cutinize the germana then the germana summarize the consolata. If something summarize the celestina then it is not rotatory. If something tourney the consolata then it cutinize the germana. The selena summarize the celestina.", "logic": "\nnot Summarize(selena, consolata)\nRotatory(consolata)\nnot Abranchial(consolata)\nCutinize(consolata, germana)\nTourney(consolata, celestina)\nSummarize(consolata, selena)\nnot Summarize(consolata, germana)\nTourney(celestina, selena)\nSummarize(germana, selena)\nSummarize(germana, celestina)\nforall x (Summarize(x, selena) -> Summarize(selena, celestina))\nforall x (Tourney(x, celestina) -> Cutinize(x, selena))\nTourney(germana, selena) and Boney(selena) -> not Boney(germana)\nforall x (Tourney(x, selena) and Summarize(x, celestina) -> not Cutinize(selena, celestina))\nforall x (Summarize(x, consolata) -> Tourney(x, consolata))\nforall x (Cutinize(x, germana) -> Summarize(germana, consolata))\nforall x (Summarize(x, celestina) -> not Rotatory(x))\nforall x (Tourney(x, consolata) -> Cutinize(x, germana))\n\nSummarize(selena, celestina)\n\nSummarize(consolata, selena) and forall x (Summarize(x, selena) -> Summarize(selena, celestina)) -> therefore Summarize(selena, celestina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The lorilee does not visit the kendal. The kendal is regular. The kendal is not meshed. The kendal aerosolize the mendie. The kendal multiply the kaleb. The kendal convene the lorilee. The kendal does not visit the mendie. The kaleb multiply the lorilee. The mendie convene the lorilee. The mendie convene the kaleb. If something convene the lorilee then the lorilee convene the kaleb. If something multiply the kaleb then it aerosolize the lorilee. If the mendie multiply the lorilee and the lorilee is collective then the mendie is not collective. If something multiply the lorilee and it convene the kaleb then the lorilee does not need the kaleb. If something convene the kendal then it multiply the kendal. If something aerosolize the mendie then the mendie convene the kendal. If something convene the kaleb then it is not regular. If something multiply the kendal then it aerosolize the mendie. The lorilee does not visit the kaleb.", "logic": "\nnot Convene(lorilee, kendal)\nRegular(kendal)\nnot Meshed(kendal)\nAerosolize(kendal, mendie)\nMultiply(kendal, kaleb)\nConvene(kendal, lorilee)\nnot Convene(kendal, mendie)\nMultiply(kaleb, lorilee)\nConvene(mendie, lorilee)\nConvene(mendie, kaleb)\nforall x (Convene(x, lorilee) -> Convene(lorilee, kaleb))\nforall x (Multiply(x, kaleb) -> Aerosolize(x, lorilee))\nMultiply(mendie, lorilee) and Collective(lorilee) -> not Collective(mendie)\nforall x (Multiply(x, lorilee) and Convene(x, kaleb) -> not Aerosolize(lorilee, kaleb))\nforall x (Convene(x, kendal) -> Multiply(x, kendal))\nforall x (Aerosolize(x, mendie) -> Convene(mendie, kendal))\nforall x (Convene(x, kaleb) -> not Regular(x))\nforall x (Multiply(x, kendal) -> Aerosolize(x, mendie))\n\nnot Convene(lorilee, kaleb)\n\nConvene(kendal, lorilee) and forall x (Convene(x, lorilee) -> Convene(lorilee, kaleb)) -> therefore Convene(lorilee, kaleb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The jeb does not visit the lenee. The lenee is stormproof. The lenee is not futuristic. The lenee ionate the hewie. The lenee burrow the aprilette. The lenee ferment the jeb. The lenee does not visit the hewie. The aprilette burrow the jeb. The hewie ferment the jeb. The hewie ferment the aprilette. If something ferment the jeb then the jeb ferment the aprilette. If something burrow the aprilette then it ionate the jeb. If the hewie burrow the jeb and the jeb is basidial then the hewie is not basidial. If something burrow the jeb and it ferment the aprilette then the jeb does not need the aprilette. If something ferment the lenee then it burrow the lenee. If something ionate the hewie then the hewie ferment the lenee. If something ferment the aprilette then it is not stormproof. If something burrow the lenee then it ionate the hewie. The hewie burrow the lenee.", "logic": "\nnot Ferment(jeb, lenee)\nStormproof(lenee)\nnot Futuristic(lenee)\nIonate(lenee, hewie)\nBurrow(lenee, aprilette)\nFerment(lenee, jeb)\nnot Ferment(lenee, hewie)\nBurrow(aprilette, jeb)\nFerment(hewie, jeb)\nFerment(hewie, aprilette)\nforall x (Ferment(x, jeb) -> Ferment(jeb, aprilette))\nforall x (Burrow(x, aprilette) -> Ionate(x, jeb))\nBurrow(hewie, jeb) and Basidial(jeb) -> not Basidial(hewie)\nforall x (Burrow(x, jeb) and Ferment(x, aprilette) -> not Ionate(jeb, aprilette))\nforall x (Ferment(x, lenee) -> Burrow(x, lenee))\nforall x (Ionate(x, hewie) -> Ferment(hewie, lenee))\nforall x (Ferment(x, aprilette) -> not Stormproof(x))\nforall x (Burrow(x, lenee) -> Ionate(x, hewie))\n\nBurrow(hewie, lenee)\n\nIonate(lenee, hewie) and forall x (Ionate(x, hewie) -> Ferment(hewie, lenee)) -> therefore Ferment(hewie, lenee) Ferment(hewie, lenee) and forall x (Ferment(x, lenee) -> Burrow(x, lenee)) -> therefore Burrow(hewie, lenee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The mirella does not visit the marit. The marit is nine. The marit is not sciatic. The marit becloud the heath. The marit pepper the lara. The marit bechance the mirella. The marit does not visit the heath. The lara pepper the mirella. The heath bechance the mirella. The heath bechance the lara. If something bechance the mirella then the mirella bechance the lara. If something pepper the lara then it becloud the mirella. If the heath pepper the mirella and the mirella is frivolous then the heath is not frivolous. If something pepper the mirella and it bechance the lara then the mirella does not need the lara. If something bechance the marit then it pepper the marit. If something becloud the heath then the heath bechance the marit. If something bechance the lara then it is not nine. If something pepper the marit then it becloud the heath. The heath does not see the marit.", "logic": "\nnot Bechance(mirella, marit)\nNine(marit)\nnot Sciatic(marit)\nBecloud(marit, heath)\nPepper(marit, lara)\nBechance(marit, mirella)\nnot Bechance(marit, heath)\nPepper(lara, mirella)\nBechance(heath, mirella)\nBechance(heath, lara)\nforall x (Bechance(x, mirella) -> Bechance(mirella, lara))\nforall x (Pepper(x, lara) -> Becloud(x, mirella))\nPepper(heath, mirella) and Frivolous(mirella) -> not Frivolous(heath)\nforall x (Pepper(x, mirella) and Bechance(x, lara) -> not Becloud(mirella, lara))\nforall x (Bechance(x, marit) -> Pepper(x, marit))\nforall x (Becloud(x, heath) -> Bechance(heath, marit))\nforall x (Bechance(x, lara) -> not Nine(x))\nforall x (Pepper(x, marit) -> Becloud(x, heath))\n\nnot Pepper(heath, marit)\n\nBecloud(marit, heath) and forall x (Becloud(x, heath) -> Bechance(heath, marit)) -> therefore Bechance(heath, marit) Bechance(heath, marit) and forall x (Bechance(x, marit) -> Pepper(x, marit)) -> therefore Pepper(heath, marit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The lolly does not visit the kynthia. The kynthia is shrunken. The kynthia is not fractional. The kynthia expend the martica. The kynthia quickstep the ingrid. The kynthia ding the lolly. The kynthia does not visit the martica. The ingrid quickstep the lolly. The martica ding the lolly. The martica ding the ingrid. If something ding the lolly then the lolly ding the ingrid. If something quickstep the ingrid then it expend the lolly. If the martica quickstep the lolly and the lolly is punished then the martica is not punished. If something quickstep the lolly and it ding the ingrid then the lolly does not need the ingrid. If something ding the kynthia then it quickstep the kynthia. If something expend the martica then the martica ding the kynthia. If something ding the ingrid then it is not shrunken. If something quickstep the kynthia then it expend the martica. The martica expend the martica.", "logic": "\nnot Ding(lolly, kynthia)\nShrunken(kynthia)\nnot Fractional(kynthia)\nExpend(kynthia, martica)\nQuickstep(kynthia, ingrid)\nDing(kynthia, lolly)\nnot Ding(kynthia, martica)\nQuickstep(ingrid, lolly)\nDing(martica, lolly)\nDing(martica, ingrid)\nforall x (Ding(x, lolly) -> Ding(lolly, ingrid))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, ingrid) -> Expend(x, lolly))\nQuickstep(martica, lolly) and Punished(lolly) -> not Punished(martica)\nforall x (Quickstep(x, lolly) and Ding(x, ingrid) -> not Expend(lolly, ingrid))\nforall x (Ding(x, kynthia) -> Quickstep(x, kynthia))\nforall x (Expend(x, martica) -> Ding(martica, kynthia))\nforall x (Ding(x, ingrid) -> not Shrunken(x))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, kynthia) -> Expend(x, martica))\n\nExpend(martica, martica)\n\nExpend(kynthia, martica) and forall x (Expend(x, martica) -> Ding(martica, kynthia)) -> therefore Ding(martica, kynthia) Ding(martica, kynthia) and forall x (Ding(x, kynthia) -> Quickstep(x, kynthia)) -> therefore Quickstep(martica, kynthia) Quickstep(martica, kynthia) and forall x (Quickstep(x, kynthia) -> Expend(x, martica)) -> therefore Expend(martica, martica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The stirling does not visit the carmelita. The carmelita is angular. The carmelita is not peristylar. The carmelita gradate the annamari. The carmelita applique the laraine. The carmelita bespot the stirling. The carmelita does not visit the annamari. The laraine applique the stirling. The annamari bespot the stirling. The annamari bespot the laraine. If something bespot the stirling then the stirling bespot the laraine. If something applique the laraine then it gradate the stirling. If the annamari applique the stirling and the stirling is sarcastic then the annamari is not sarcastic. If something applique the stirling and it bespot the laraine then the stirling does not need the laraine. If something bespot the carmelita then it applique the carmelita. If something gradate the annamari then the annamari bespot the carmelita. If something bespot the laraine then it is not angular. If something applique the carmelita then it gradate the annamari. The annamari does not need the annamari.", "logic": "\nnot Bespot(stirling, carmelita)\nAngular(carmelita)\nnot Peristylar(carmelita)\nGradate(carmelita, annamari)\nApplique(carmelita, laraine)\nBespot(carmelita, stirling)\nnot Bespot(carmelita, annamari)\nApplique(laraine, stirling)\nBespot(annamari, stirling)\nBespot(annamari, laraine)\nforall x (Bespot(x, stirling) -> Bespot(stirling, laraine))\nforall x (Applique(x, laraine) -> Gradate(x, stirling))\nApplique(annamari, stirling) and Sarcastic(stirling) -> not Sarcastic(annamari)\nforall x (Applique(x, stirling) and Bespot(x, laraine) -> not Gradate(stirling, laraine))\nforall x (Bespot(x, carmelita) -> Applique(x, carmelita))\nforall x (Gradate(x, annamari) -> Bespot(annamari, carmelita))\nforall x (Bespot(x, laraine) -> not Angular(x))\nforall x (Applique(x, carmelita) -> Gradate(x, annamari))\n\nnot Gradate(annamari, annamari)\n\nGradate(carmelita, annamari) and forall x (Gradate(x, annamari) -> Bespot(annamari, carmelita)) -> therefore Bespot(annamari, carmelita) Bespot(annamari, carmelita) and forall x (Bespot(x, carmelita) -> Applique(x, carmelita)) -> therefore Applique(annamari, carmelita) Applique(annamari, carmelita) and forall x (Applique(x, carmelita) -> Gradate(x, annamari)) -> therefore Gradate(annamari, annamari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The aleta does not visit the beatrix. The beatrix is nigh. The beatrix is not fifty. The beatrix cakewalk the emmey. The beatrix command the shandee. The beatrix furbish the aleta. The beatrix does not visit the emmey. The shandee command the aleta. The emmey furbish the aleta. The emmey furbish the shandee. If something furbish the aleta then the aleta furbish the shandee. If something command the shandee then it cakewalk the aleta. If the emmey command the aleta and the aleta is gracious then the emmey is not gracious. If something command the aleta and it furbish the shandee then the aleta does not need the shandee. If something furbish the beatrix then it command the beatrix. If something cakewalk the emmey then the emmey furbish the beatrix. If something furbish the shandee then it is not nigh. If something command the beatrix then it cakewalk the emmey. The emmey does not need the aleta.", "logic": "\nnot Furbish(aleta, beatrix)\nNigh(beatrix)\nnot Fifty(beatrix)\nCakewalk(beatrix, emmey)\nCommand(beatrix, shandee)\nFurbish(beatrix, aleta)\nnot Furbish(beatrix, emmey)\nCommand(shandee, aleta)\nFurbish(emmey, aleta)\nFurbish(emmey, shandee)\nforall x (Furbish(x, aleta) -> Furbish(aleta, shandee))\nforall x (Command(x, shandee) -> Cakewalk(x, aleta))\nCommand(emmey, aleta) and Gracious(aleta) -> not Gracious(emmey)\nforall x (Command(x, aleta) and Furbish(x, shandee) -> not Cakewalk(aleta, shandee))\nforall x (Furbish(x, beatrix) -> Command(x, beatrix))\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, emmey) -> Furbish(emmey, beatrix))\nforall x (Furbish(x, shandee) -> not Nigh(x))\nforall x (Command(x, beatrix) -> Cakewalk(x, emmey))\n\nnot Cakewalk(emmey, aleta)\n\nforall x (Command(x, shandee) -> Cakewalk(x, aleta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The cordula does not visit the amberly. The amberly is lovely. The amberly is not disposed. The amberly foil the fanechka. The amberly diazotize the rodrique. The amberly provision the cordula. The amberly does not visit the fanechka. The rodrique diazotize the cordula. The fanechka provision the cordula. The fanechka provision the rodrique. If something provision the cordula then the cordula provision the rodrique. If something diazotize the rodrique then it foil the cordula. If the fanechka diazotize the cordula and the cordula is awol then the fanechka is not awol. If something diazotize the cordula and it provision the rodrique then the cordula does not need the rodrique. If something provision the amberly then it diazotize the amberly. If something foil the fanechka then the fanechka provision the amberly. If something provision the rodrique then it is not lovely. If something diazotize the amberly then it foil the fanechka. The rodrique diazotize the amberly.", "logic": "\nnot Provision(cordula, amberly)\nLovely(amberly)\nnot Disposed(amberly)\nFoil(amberly, fanechka)\nDiazotize(amberly, rodrique)\nProvision(amberly, cordula)\nnot Provision(amberly, fanechka)\nDiazotize(rodrique, cordula)\nProvision(fanechka, cordula)\nProvision(fanechka, rodrique)\nforall x (Provision(x, cordula) -> Provision(cordula, rodrique))\nforall x (Diazotize(x, rodrique) -> Foil(x, cordula))\nDiazotize(fanechka, cordula) and Awol(cordula) -> not Awol(fanechka)\nforall x (Diazotize(x, cordula) and Provision(x, rodrique) -> not Foil(cordula, rodrique))\nforall x (Provision(x, amberly) -> Diazotize(x, amberly))\nforall x (Foil(x, fanechka) -> Provision(fanechka, amberly))\nforall x (Provision(x, rodrique) -> not Lovely(x))\nforall x (Diazotize(x, amberly) -> Foil(x, fanechka))\n\nDiazotize(rodrique, amberly)\n\nforall x (Provision(x, amberly) -> Diazotize(x, amberly)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The ingeberg does not visit the cheslie. The cheslie is insoluble. The cheslie is not voluted. The cheslie imbed the willette. The cheslie mulct the sayres. The cheslie harass the ingeberg. The cheslie does not visit the willette. The sayres mulct the ingeberg. The willette harass the ingeberg. The willette harass the sayres. If something harass the ingeberg then the ingeberg harass the sayres. If something mulct the sayres then it imbed the ingeberg. If the willette mulct the ingeberg and the ingeberg is epiphysial then the willette is not epiphysial. If something mulct the ingeberg and it harass the sayres then the ingeberg does not need the sayres. If something harass the cheslie then it mulct the cheslie. If something imbed the willette then the willette harass the cheslie. If something harass the sayres then it is not insoluble. If something mulct the cheslie then it imbed the willette. The ingeberg does not need the ingeberg.", "logic": "\nnot Harass(ingeberg, cheslie)\nInsoluble(cheslie)\nnot Voluted(cheslie)\nImbed(cheslie, willette)\nMulct(cheslie, sayres)\nHarass(cheslie, ingeberg)\nnot Harass(cheslie, willette)\nMulct(sayres, ingeberg)\nHarass(willette, ingeberg)\nHarass(willette, sayres)\nforall x (Harass(x, ingeberg) -> Harass(ingeberg, sayres))\nforall x (Mulct(x, sayres) -> Imbed(x, ingeberg))\nMulct(willette, ingeberg) and Epiphysial(ingeberg) -> not Epiphysial(willette)\nforall x (Mulct(x, ingeberg) and Harass(x, sayres) -> not Imbed(ingeberg, sayres))\nforall x (Harass(x, cheslie) -> Mulct(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Imbed(x, willette) -> Harass(willette, cheslie))\nforall x (Harass(x, sayres) -> not Insoluble(x))\nforall x (Mulct(x, cheslie) -> Imbed(x, willette))\n\nnot Imbed(ingeberg, ingeberg)\n\nforall x (Mulct(x, sayres) -> Imbed(x, ingeberg)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The gusty does not visit the meggi. The meggi is tapering. The meggi is not inductive. The meggi sport the johnny. The meggi tinker the ivor. The meggi edge the gusty. The meggi does not visit the johnny. The ivor tinker the gusty. The johnny edge the gusty. The johnny edge the ivor. If something edge the gusty then the gusty edge the ivor. If something tinker the ivor then it sport the gusty. If the johnny tinker the gusty and the gusty is anamorphic then the johnny is not anamorphic. If something tinker the gusty and it edge the ivor then the gusty does not need the ivor. If something edge the meggi then it tinker the meggi. If something sport the johnny then the johnny edge the meggi. If something edge the ivor then it is not tapering. If something tinker the meggi then it sport the johnny. The ivor sport the johnny.", "logic": "\nnot Edge(gusty, meggi)\nTapering(meggi)\nnot Inductive(meggi)\nSport(meggi, johnny)\nTinker(meggi, ivor)\nEdge(meggi, gusty)\nnot Edge(meggi, johnny)\nTinker(ivor, gusty)\nEdge(johnny, gusty)\nEdge(johnny, ivor)\nforall x (Edge(x, gusty) -> Edge(gusty, ivor))\nforall x (Tinker(x, ivor) -> Sport(x, gusty))\nTinker(johnny, gusty) and Anamorphic(gusty) -> not Anamorphic(johnny)\nforall x (Tinker(x, gusty) and Edge(x, ivor) -> not Sport(gusty, ivor))\nforall x (Edge(x, meggi) -> Tinker(x, meggi))\nforall x (Sport(x, johnny) -> Edge(johnny, meggi))\nforall x (Edge(x, ivor) -> not Tapering(x))\nforall x (Tinker(x, meggi) -> Sport(x, johnny))\n\nSport(ivor, johnny)\n\nforall x (Tinker(x, meggi) -> Sport(x, johnny)) <- forall x (Edge(x, meggi) -> Tinker(x, meggi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The carol does not visit the aloisia. The aloisia is stellar. The aloisia is not canicular. The aloisia demulsify the steve. The aloisia gorge the rhoda. The aloisia excavate the carol. The aloisia does not visit the steve. The rhoda gorge the carol. The steve excavate the carol. The steve excavate the rhoda. If something excavate the carol then the carol excavate the rhoda. If something gorge the rhoda then it demulsify the carol. If the steve gorge the carol and the carol is semidark then the steve is not semidark. If something gorge the carol and it excavate the rhoda then the carol does not need the rhoda. If something excavate the aloisia then it gorge the aloisia. If something demulsify the steve then the steve excavate the aloisia. If something excavate the rhoda then it is not stellar. If something gorge the aloisia then it demulsify the steve. The steve does not see the carol.", "logic": "\nnot Excavate(carol, aloisia)\nStellar(aloisia)\nnot Canicular(aloisia)\nDemulsify(aloisia, steve)\nGorge(aloisia, rhoda)\nExcavate(aloisia, carol)\nnot Excavate(aloisia, steve)\nGorge(rhoda, carol)\nExcavate(steve, carol)\nExcavate(steve, rhoda)\nforall x (Excavate(x, carol) -> Excavate(carol, rhoda))\nforall x (Gorge(x, rhoda) -> Demulsify(x, carol))\nGorge(steve, carol) and Semidark(carol) -> not Semidark(steve)\nforall x (Gorge(x, carol) and Excavate(x, rhoda) -> not Demulsify(carol, rhoda))\nforall x (Excavate(x, aloisia) -> Gorge(x, aloisia))\nforall x (Demulsify(x, steve) -> Excavate(steve, aloisia))\nforall x (Excavate(x, rhoda) -> not Stellar(x))\nforall x (Gorge(x, aloisia) -> Demulsify(x, steve))\n\nnot Gorge(steve, carol)\n\nnot Gorge(steve, carol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The blithe does not visit the harriett. The harriett is violated. The harriett is not liquid. The harriett compliment the welsh. The harriett stereotype the melanie. The harriett revert the blithe. The harriett does not visit the welsh. The melanie stereotype the blithe. The welsh revert the blithe. The welsh revert the melanie. If something revert the blithe then the blithe revert the melanie. If something stereotype the melanie then it compliment the blithe. If the welsh stereotype the blithe and the blithe is taiwanese then the welsh is not taiwanese. If something stereotype the blithe and it revert the melanie then the blithe does not need the melanie. If something revert the harriett then it stereotype the harriett. If something compliment the welsh then the welsh revert the harriett. If something revert the melanie then it is not violated. If something stereotype the harriett then it compliment the welsh. The melanie revert the harriett.", "logic": "\nnot Revert(blithe, harriett)\nViolated(harriett)\nnot Liquid(harriett)\nCompliment(harriett, welsh)\nStereotype(harriett, melanie)\nRevert(harriett, blithe)\nnot Revert(harriett, welsh)\nStereotype(melanie, blithe)\nRevert(welsh, blithe)\nRevert(welsh, melanie)\nforall x (Revert(x, blithe) -> Revert(blithe, melanie))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, melanie) -> Compliment(x, blithe))\nStereotype(welsh, blithe) and Taiwanese(blithe) -> not Taiwanese(welsh)\nforall x (Stereotype(x, blithe) and Revert(x, melanie) -> not Compliment(blithe, melanie))\nforall x (Revert(x, harriett) -> Stereotype(x, harriett))\nforall x (Compliment(x, welsh) -> Revert(welsh, harriett))\nforall x (Revert(x, melanie) -> not Violated(x))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, harriett) -> Compliment(x, welsh))\n\nRevert(melanie, harriett)\n\nRevert(melanie, harriett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The cherice does not visit the cindi. The cindi is unpointed. The cindi is not groggy. The cindi retrench the aleck. The cindi work the camilla. The cindi allegorize the cherice. The cindi does not visit the aleck. The camilla work the cherice. The aleck allegorize the cherice. The aleck allegorize the camilla. If something allegorize the cherice then the cherice allegorize the camilla. If something work the camilla then it retrench the cherice. If the aleck work the cherice and the cherice is psychical then the aleck is not psychical. If something work the cherice and it allegorize the camilla then the cherice does not need the camilla. If something allegorize the cindi then it work the cindi. If something retrench the aleck then the aleck allegorize the cindi. If something allegorize the camilla then it is not unpointed. If something work the cindi then it retrench the aleck. The cindi does not need the cindi.", "logic": "\nnot Allegorize(cherice, cindi)\nUnpointed(cindi)\nnot Groggy(cindi)\nRetrench(cindi, aleck)\nWork(cindi, camilla)\nAllegorize(cindi, cherice)\nnot Allegorize(cindi, aleck)\nWork(camilla, cherice)\nAllegorize(aleck, cherice)\nAllegorize(aleck, camilla)\nforall x (Allegorize(x, cherice) -> Allegorize(cherice, camilla))\nforall x (Work(x, camilla) -> Retrench(x, cherice))\nWork(aleck, cherice) and Psychical(cherice) -> not Psychical(aleck)\nforall x (Work(x, cherice) and Allegorize(x, camilla) -> not Retrench(cherice, camilla))\nforall x (Allegorize(x, cindi) -> Work(x, cindi))\nforall x (Retrench(x, aleck) -> Allegorize(aleck, cindi))\nforall x (Allegorize(x, camilla) -> not Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Work(x, cindi) -> Retrench(x, aleck))\n\nnot Retrench(cindi, cindi)\n\nnot Retrench(cindi, cindi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "The heddie does not visit the danie. The danie is mucinoid. The danie is not riparian. The danie detach the min. The danie waffle the poul. The danie overrule the heddie. The danie does not visit the min. The poul waffle the heddie. The min overrule the heddie. The min overrule the poul. If something overrule the heddie then the heddie overrule the poul. If something waffle the poul then it detach the heddie. If the min waffle the heddie and the heddie is undreamed then the min is not undreamed. If something waffle the heddie and it overrule the poul then the heddie does not need the poul. If something overrule the danie then it waffle the danie. If something detach the min then the min overrule the danie. If something overrule the poul then it is not mucinoid. If something waffle the danie then it detach the min. The heddie detach the danie.", "logic": "\nnot Overrule(heddie, danie)\nMucinoid(danie)\nnot Riparian(danie)\nDetach(danie, min)\nWaffle(danie, poul)\nOverrule(danie, heddie)\nnot Overrule(danie, min)\nWaffle(poul, heddie)\nOverrule(min, heddie)\nOverrule(min, poul)\nforall x (Overrule(x, heddie) -> Overrule(heddie, poul))\nforall x (Waffle(x, poul) -> Detach(x, heddie))\nWaffle(min, heddie) and Undreamed(heddie) -> not Undreamed(min)\nforall x (Waffle(x, heddie) and Overrule(x, poul) -> not Detach(heddie, poul))\nforall x (Overrule(x, danie) -> Waffle(x, danie))\nforall x (Detach(x, min) -> Overrule(min, danie))\nforall x (Overrule(x, poul) -> not Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Waffle(x, danie) -> Detach(x, min))\n\nDetach(heddie, danie)\n\nDetach(heddie, danie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1288"} {"premises": "Lela is theatrical. If Lela is inky then Lela is preclusive. Big things are inky. If Lela is theatrical then Lela is pearly. Round things are ergotropic. All theatrical, preclusive things are ergotropic. Smart things are theatrical. Lela is theatrical.", "logic": "\nTheatrical(lela)\nInky(lela) -> Preclusive(lela)\nforall x (Pearly(x) -> Inky(x))\nTheatrical(lela) -> Pearly(lela)\nforall x (Proactive(x) -> Ergotropic(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) and Preclusive(x) -> Ergotropic(x))\nforall x (Preclusive(x) -> Theatrical(x))\n\nTheatrical(lela)\n\ntherefore Theatrical(lela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Leanna is metastable. If Leanna is ectopic then Leanna is supposed. Big things are ectopic. If Leanna is metastable then Leanna is labelled. Round things are tenth. All metastable, supposed things are tenth. Smart things are metastable. Leanna is not metastable.", "logic": "\nMetastable(leanna)\nEctopic(leanna) -> Supposed(leanna)\nforall x (Labelled(x) -> Ectopic(x))\nMetastable(leanna) -> Labelled(leanna)\nforall x (Extralegal(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Metastable(x) and Supposed(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Supposed(x) -> Metastable(x))\n\nnot Metastable(leanna)\n\ntherefore Metastable(leanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Rosabel is awakened. If Rosabel is rising then Rosabel is potbellied. Big things are rising. If Rosabel is awakened then Rosabel is moroccan. Round things are gamy. All awakened, potbellied things are gamy. Smart things are awakened. Rosabel is moroccan.", "logic": "\nAwakened(rosabel)\nRising(rosabel) -> Potbellied(rosabel)\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Rising(x))\nAwakened(rosabel) -> Moroccan(rosabel)\nforall x (Outlined(x) -> Gamy(x))\nforall x (Awakened(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Gamy(x))\nforall x (Potbellied(x) -> Awakened(x))\n\nMoroccan(rosabel)\n\nAwakened(rosabel) and Awakened(rosabel) -> Moroccan(rosabel) -> therefore Moroccan(rosabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Phillipe is odious. If Phillipe is cosmic then Phillipe is oppressive. Big things are cosmic. If Phillipe is odious then Phillipe is tried. Round things are renascent. All odious, oppressive things are renascent. Smart things are odious. Phillipe is not tried.", "logic": "\nOdious(phillipe)\nCosmic(phillipe) -> Oppressive(phillipe)\nforall x (Tried(x) -> Cosmic(x))\nOdious(phillipe) -> Tried(phillipe)\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) -> Renascent(x))\nforall x (Odious(x) and Oppressive(x) -> Renascent(x))\nforall x (Oppressive(x) -> Odious(x))\n\nnot Tried(phillipe)\n\nOdious(phillipe) and Odious(phillipe) -> Tried(phillipe) -> therefore Tried(phillipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Bobby is able. If Bobby is cantering then Bobby is hardback. Big things are cantering. If Bobby is able then Bobby is stateless. Round things are unangry. All able, hardback things are unangry. Smart things are able. Bobby is cantering.", "logic": "\nAble(bobby)\nCantering(bobby) -> Hardback(bobby)\nforall x (Stateless(x) -> Cantering(x))\nAble(bobby) -> Stateless(bobby)\nforall x (Bracteate(x) -> Unangry(x))\nforall x (Able(x) and Hardback(x) -> Unangry(x))\nforall x (Hardback(x) -> Able(x))\n\nCantering(bobby)\n\nAble(bobby) and Able(bobby) -> Stateless(bobby) -> therefore Stateless(bobby) Stateless(bobby) and forall x (Stateless(x) -> Cantering(x)) -> therefore Cantering(bobby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Kent is ossicular. If Kent is blastemal then Kent is coiling. Big things are blastemal. If Kent is ossicular then Kent is leafless. Round things are diazo. All ossicular, coiling things are diazo. Smart things are ossicular. Kent is not blastemal.", "logic": "\nOssicular(kent)\nBlastemal(kent) -> Coiling(kent)\nforall x (Leafless(x) -> Blastemal(x))\nOssicular(kent) -> Leafless(kent)\nforall x (Aguish(x) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Ossicular(x) and Coiling(x) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Ossicular(x))\n\nnot Blastemal(kent)\n\nOssicular(kent) and Ossicular(kent) -> Leafless(kent) -> therefore Leafless(kent) Leafless(kent) and forall x (Leafless(x) -> Blastemal(x)) -> therefore Blastemal(kent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Julia is unlobed. If Julia is chirpy then Julia is sevenfold. Big things are chirpy. If Julia is unlobed then Julia is fetching. Round things are aneurismal. All unlobed, sevenfold things are aneurismal. Smart things are unlobed. Julia is sevenfold.", "logic": "\nUnlobed(julia)\nChirpy(julia) -> Sevenfold(julia)\nforall x (Fetching(x) -> Chirpy(x))\nUnlobed(julia) -> Fetching(julia)\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) and Sevenfold(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) -> Unlobed(x))\n\nSevenfold(julia)\n\nUnlobed(julia) and Unlobed(julia) -> Fetching(julia) -> therefore Fetching(julia) Fetching(julia) and forall x (Fetching(x) -> Chirpy(x)) -> therefore Chirpy(julia) Chirpy(julia) and Chirpy(julia) -> Sevenfold(julia) -> therefore Sevenfold(julia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Kayla is sheeny. If Kayla is pitted then Kayla is adulterant. Big things are pitted. If Kayla is sheeny then Kayla is crabbed. Round things are casteless. All sheeny, adulterant things are casteless. Smart things are sheeny. Kayla is not adulterant.", "logic": "\nSheeny(kayla)\nPitted(kayla) -> Adulterant(kayla)\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Pitted(x))\nSheeny(kayla) -> Crabbed(kayla)\nforall x (Grabby(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Sheeny(x) and Adulterant(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> Sheeny(x))\n\nnot Adulterant(kayla)\n\nSheeny(kayla) and Sheeny(kayla) -> Crabbed(kayla) -> therefore Crabbed(kayla) Crabbed(kayla) and forall x (Crabbed(x) -> Pitted(x)) -> therefore Pitted(kayla) Pitted(kayla) and Pitted(kayla) -> Adulterant(kayla) -> therefore Adulterant(kayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Junette is voguish. If Junette is unlit then Junette is oozing. Big things are unlit. If Junette is voguish then Junette is biaural. Round things are arranged. All voguish, oozing things are arranged. Smart things are voguish. Junette is not untufted.", "logic": "\nVoguish(junette)\nUnlit(junette) -> Oozing(junette)\nforall x (Biaural(x) -> Unlit(x))\nVoguish(junette) -> Biaural(junette)\nforall x (Untufted(x) -> Arranged(x))\nforall x (Voguish(x) and Oozing(x) -> Arranged(x))\nforall x (Oozing(x) -> Voguish(x))\n\nnot Untufted(junette)\n\nnot Untufted(junette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "Cynthy is sacral. If Cynthy is recovered then Cynthy is lewd. Big things are recovered. If Cynthy is sacral then Cynthy is prepared. Round things are patriotic. All sacral, lewd things are patriotic. Smart things are sacral. Cynthy is cold.", "logic": "\nSacral(cynthy)\nRecovered(cynthy) -> Lewd(cynthy)\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Recovered(x))\nSacral(cynthy) -> Prepared(cynthy)\nforall x (Achaean(x) -> Patriotic(x))\nforall x (Sacral(x) and Lewd(x) -> Patriotic(x))\nforall x (Lewd(x) -> Sacral(x))\n\nCold(cynthy)\n\nCold(cynthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-676"} {"premises": "The adelind stone the marietta. The marietta is tripartite. The jedediah suggest the karalynn. The karalynn is not tripartite. If something stone the adelind and it suggest the adelind then the adelind is tripartite. If something stone the marietta then the marietta is not disunited. If something is disunited and it suggest the adelind then the adelind suggest the jedediah. If the karalynn desorb the adelind and the karalynn does not see the adelind then the adelind suggest the marietta. If something stone the karalynn then the karalynn suggest the marietta. If something is tripartite and not disunited then it stone the karalynn. The adelind stone the marietta.", "logic": "\nStone(adelind, marietta)\nTripartite(marietta)\nSuggest(jedediah, karalynn)\nnot Tripartite(karalynn)\nforall x (Stone(x, adelind) and Suggest(x, adelind) -> Tripartite(adelind))\nforall x (Stone(x, marietta) -> not Disunited(marietta))\nforall x (Disunited(x) and Suggest(x, adelind) -> Suggest(adelind, jedediah))\nDesorb(karalynn, adelind) and not Stone(karalynn, adelind) -> Suggest(adelind, marietta)\nforall x (Stone(x, karalynn) -> Suggest(karalynn, marietta))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and not Disunited(x) -> Stone(x, karalynn))\n\nStone(adelind, marietta)\n\ntherefore Stone(adelind, marietta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The addie betray the klarika. The klarika is blurry. The rochell venture the alameda. The alameda is not blurry. If something betray the addie and it venture the addie then the addie is blurry. If something betray the klarika then the klarika is not squalling. If something is squalling and it venture the addie then the addie venture the rochell. If the alameda fluoridise the addie and the alameda does not see the addie then the addie venture the klarika. If something betray the alameda then the alameda venture the klarika. If something is blurry and not squalling then it betray the alameda. The klarika is not blurry.", "logic": "\nBetray(addie, klarika)\nBlurry(klarika)\nVenture(rochell, alameda)\nnot Blurry(alameda)\nforall x (Betray(x, addie) and Venture(x, addie) -> Blurry(addie))\nforall x (Betray(x, klarika) -> not Squalling(klarika))\nforall x (Squalling(x) and Venture(x, addie) -> Venture(addie, rochell))\nFluoridise(alameda, addie) and not Betray(alameda, addie) -> Venture(addie, klarika)\nforall x (Betray(x, alameda) -> Venture(alameda, klarika))\nforall x (Blurry(x) and not Squalling(x) -> Betray(x, alameda))\n\nnot Blurry(klarika)\n\ntherefore Blurry(klarika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The sandi trellis the agace. The agace is halcyon. The hanna enlarge the manya. The manya is not halcyon. If something trellis the sandi and it enlarge the sandi then the sandi is halcyon. If something trellis the agace then the agace is not nonmodern. If something is nonmodern and it enlarge the sandi then the sandi enlarge the hanna. If the manya cannulate the sandi and the manya does not see the sandi then the sandi enlarge the agace. If something trellis the manya then the manya enlarge the agace. If something is halcyon and not nonmodern then it trellis the manya. The agace is not nonmodern.", "logic": "\nTrellis(sandi, agace)\nHalcyon(agace)\nEnlarge(hanna, manya)\nnot Halcyon(manya)\nforall x (Trellis(x, sandi) and Enlarge(x, sandi) -> Halcyon(sandi))\nforall x (Trellis(x, agace) -> not Nonmodern(agace))\nforall x (Nonmodern(x) and Enlarge(x, sandi) -> Enlarge(sandi, hanna))\nCannulate(manya, sandi) and not Trellis(manya, sandi) -> Enlarge(sandi, agace)\nforall x (Trellis(x, manya) -> Enlarge(manya, agace))\nforall x (Halcyon(x) and not Nonmodern(x) -> Trellis(x, manya))\n\nnot Nonmodern(agace)\n\nTrellis(sandi, agace) and forall x (Trellis(x, agace) -> not Nonmodern(agace)) -> therefore not Nonmodern(agace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The hyacinth piddle the alan. The alan is treeless. The valery enjoy the corine. The corine is not treeless. If something piddle the hyacinth and it enjoy the hyacinth then the hyacinth is treeless. If something piddle the alan then the alan is not port. If something is port and it enjoy the hyacinth then the hyacinth enjoy the valery. If the corine stall the hyacinth and the corine does not see the hyacinth then the hyacinth enjoy the alan. If something piddle the corine then the corine enjoy the alan. If something is treeless and not port then it piddle the corine. The alan is port.", "logic": "\nPiddle(hyacinth, alan)\nTreeless(alan)\nEnjoy(valery, corine)\nnot Treeless(corine)\nforall x (Piddle(x, hyacinth) and Enjoy(x, hyacinth) -> Treeless(hyacinth))\nforall x (Piddle(x, alan) -> not Port(alan))\nforall x (Port(x) and Enjoy(x, hyacinth) -> Enjoy(hyacinth, valery))\nStall(corine, hyacinth) and not Piddle(corine, hyacinth) -> Enjoy(hyacinth, alan)\nforall x (Piddle(x, corine) -> Enjoy(corine, alan))\nforall x (Treeless(x) and not Port(x) -> Piddle(x, corine))\n\nPort(alan)\n\nPiddle(hyacinth, alan) and forall x (Piddle(x, alan) -> not Port(alan)) -> therefore not Port(alan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The quinta fatigue the hamnet. The hamnet is concluding. The ernie conjure the ailene. The ailene is not concluding. If something fatigue the quinta and it conjure the quinta then the quinta is concluding. If something fatigue the hamnet then the hamnet is not clerical. If something is clerical and it conjure the quinta then the quinta conjure the ernie. If the ailene wink the quinta and the ailene does not see the quinta then the quinta conjure the hamnet. If something fatigue the ailene then the ailene conjure the hamnet. If something is concluding and not clerical then it fatigue the ailene. The hamnet fatigue the ailene.", "logic": "\nFatigue(quinta, hamnet)\nConcluding(hamnet)\nConjure(ernie, ailene)\nnot Concluding(ailene)\nforall x (Fatigue(x, quinta) and Conjure(x, quinta) -> Concluding(quinta))\nforall x (Fatigue(x, hamnet) -> not Clerical(hamnet))\nforall x (Clerical(x) and Conjure(x, quinta) -> Conjure(quinta, ernie))\nWink(ailene, quinta) and not Fatigue(ailene, quinta) -> Conjure(quinta, hamnet)\nforall x (Fatigue(x, ailene) -> Conjure(ailene, hamnet))\nforall x (Concluding(x) and not Clerical(x) -> Fatigue(x, ailene))\n\nFatigue(hamnet, ailene)\n\nFatigue(quinta, hamnet) and forall x (Fatigue(x, hamnet) -> not Clerical(hamnet)) -> therefore not Clerical(hamnet) Concluding(hamnet) and not Clerical(hamnet) and forall x (Concluding(x) and not Clerical(x) -> Fatigue(x, ailene)) -> therefore Fatigue(hamnet, ailene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The rob chivy the tatiana. The tatiana is incisive. The erinn entitle the drake. The drake is not incisive. If something chivy the rob and it entitle the rob then the rob is incisive. If something chivy the tatiana then the tatiana is not cuticular. If something is cuticular and it entitle the rob then the rob entitle the erinn. If the drake advect the rob and the drake does not see the rob then the rob entitle the tatiana. If something chivy the drake then the drake entitle the tatiana. If something is incisive and not cuticular then it chivy the drake. The tatiana does not see the drake.", "logic": "\nChivy(rob, tatiana)\nIncisive(tatiana)\nEntitle(erinn, drake)\nnot Incisive(drake)\nforall x (Chivy(x, rob) and Entitle(x, rob) -> Incisive(rob))\nforall x (Chivy(x, tatiana) -> not Cuticular(tatiana))\nforall x (Cuticular(x) and Entitle(x, rob) -> Entitle(rob, erinn))\nAdvect(drake, rob) and not Chivy(drake, rob) -> Entitle(rob, tatiana)\nforall x (Chivy(x, drake) -> Entitle(drake, tatiana))\nforall x (Incisive(x) and not Cuticular(x) -> Chivy(x, drake))\n\nnot Chivy(tatiana, drake)\n\nChivy(rob, tatiana) and forall x (Chivy(x, tatiana) -> not Cuticular(tatiana)) -> therefore not Cuticular(tatiana) Incisive(tatiana) and not Cuticular(tatiana) and forall x (Incisive(x) and not Cuticular(x) -> Chivy(x, drake)) -> therefore Chivy(tatiana, drake)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The ronnie tape the roby. The roby is ukrainian. The adrianne rubberize the aubine. The aubine is not ukrainian. If something tape the ronnie and it rubberize the ronnie then the ronnie is ukrainian. If something tape the roby then the roby is not genitive. If something is genitive and it rubberize the ronnie then the ronnie rubberize the adrianne. If the aubine unlade the ronnie and the aubine does not see the ronnie then the ronnie rubberize the roby. If something tape the aubine then the aubine rubberize the roby. If something is ukrainian and not genitive then it tape the aubine. The aubine rubberize the roby.", "logic": "\nTape(ronnie, roby)\nUkrainian(roby)\nRubberize(adrianne, aubine)\nnot Ukrainian(aubine)\nforall x (Tape(x, ronnie) and Rubberize(x, ronnie) -> Ukrainian(ronnie))\nforall x (Tape(x, roby) -> not Genitive(roby))\nforall x (Genitive(x) and Rubberize(x, ronnie) -> Rubberize(ronnie, adrianne))\nUnlade(aubine, ronnie) and not Tape(aubine, ronnie) -> Rubberize(ronnie, roby)\nforall x (Tape(x, aubine) -> Rubberize(aubine, roby))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) and not Genitive(x) -> Tape(x, aubine))\n\nRubberize(aubine, roby)\n\nTape(ronnie, roby) and forall x (Tape(x, roby) -> not Genitive(roby)) -> therefore not Genitive(roby) Ukrainian(roby) and not Genitive(roby) and forall x (Ukrainian(x) and not Genitive(x) -> Tape(x, aubine)) -> therefore Tape(roby, aubine) Tape(roby, aubine) and forall x (Tape(x, aubine) -> Rubberize(aubine, roby)) -> therefore Rubberize(aubine, roby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The renard desolate the portia. The portia is eutrophic. The theresa interleave the harlan. The harlan is not eutrophic. If something desolate the renard and it interleave the renard then the renard is eutrophic. If something desolate the portia then the portia is not unrevived. If something is unrevived and it interleave the renard then the renard interleave the theresa. If the harlan straiten the renard and the harlan does not see the renard then the renard interleave the portia. If something desolate the harlan then the harlan interleave the portia. If something is eutrophic and not unrevived then it desolate the harlan. The harlan does not visit the portia.", "logic": "\nDesolate(renard, portia)\nEutrophic(portia)\nInterleave(theresa, harlan)\nnot Eutrophic(harlan)\nforall x (Desolate(x, renard) and Interleave(x, renard) -> Eutrophic(renard))\nforall x (Desolate(x, portia) -> not Unrevived(portia))\nforall x (Unrevived(x) and Interleave(x, renard) -> Interleave(renard, theresa))\nStraiten(harlan, renard) and not Desolate(harlan, renard) -> Interleave(renard, portia)\nforall x (Desolate(x, harlan) -> Interleave(harlan, portia))\nforall x (Eutrophic(x) and not Unrevived(x) -> Desolate(x, harlan))\n\nnot Interleave(harlan, portia)\n\nDesolate(renard, portia) and forall x (Desolate(x, portia) -> not Unrevived(portia)) -> therefore not Unrevived(portia) Eutrophic(portia) and not Unrevived(portia) and forall x (Eutrophic(x) and not Unrevived(x) -> Desolate(x, harlan)) -> therefore Desolate(portia, harlan) Desolate(portia, harlan) and forall x (Desolate(x, harlan) -> Interleave(harlan, portia)) -> therefore Interleave(harlan, portia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The cyrille strengthen the izak. The izak is sinuous. The antonio tittup the dani. The dani is not sinuous. If something strengthen the cyrille and it tittup the cyrille then the cyrille is sinuous. If something strengthen the izak then the izak is not welcome. If something is welcome and it tittup the cyrille then the cyrille tittup the antonio. If the dani recoil the cyrille and the dani does not see the cyrille then the cyrille tittup the izak. If something strengthen the dani then the dani tittup the izak. If something is sinuous and not welcome then it strengthen the dani. The cyrille does not visit the antonio.", "logic": "\nStrengthen(cyrille, izak)\nSinuous(izak)\nTittup(antonio, dani)\nnot Sinuous(dani)\nforall x (Strengthen(x, cyrille) and Tittup(x, cyrille) -> Sinuous(cyrille))\nforall x (Strengthen(x, izak) -> not Welcome(izak))\nforall x (Welcome(x) and Tittup(x, cyrille) -> Tittup(cyrille, antonio))\nRecoil(dani, cyrille) and not Strengthen(dani, cyrille) -> Tittup(cyrille, izak)\nforall x (Strengthen(x, dani) -> Tittup(dani, izak))\nforall x (Sinuous(x) and not Welcome(x) -> Strengthen(x, dani))\n\nnot Tittup(cyrille, antonio)\n\nforall x (Welcome(x) and Tittup(x, cyrille) -> Tittup(cyrille, antonio)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The antonetta devil the ursulina. The ursulina is eutherian. The evangelia sprain the dorian. The dorian is not eutherian. If something devil the antonetta and it sprain the antonetta then the antonetta is eutherian. If something devil the ursulina then the ursulina is not slanted. If something is slanted and it sprain the antonetta then the antonetta sprain the evangelia. If the dorian squabble the antonetta and the dorian does not see the antonetta then the antonetta sprain the ursulina. If something devil the dorian then the dorian sprain the ursulina. If something is eutherian and not slanted then it devil the dorian. The evangelia devil the dorian.", "logic": "\nDevil(antonetta, ursulina)\nEutherian(ursulina)\nSprain(evangelia, dorian)\nnot Eutherian(dorian)\nforall x (Devil(x, antonetta) and Sprain(x, antonetta) -> Eutherian(antonetta))\nforall x (Devil(x, ursulina) -> not Slanted(ursulina))\nforall x (Slanted(x) and Sprain(x, antonetta) -> Sprain(antonetta, evangelia))\nSquabble(dorian, antonetta) and not Devil(dorian, antonetta) -> Sprain(antonetta, ursulina)\nforall x (Devil(x, dorian) -> Sprain(dorian, ursulina))\nforall x (Eutherian(x) and not Slanted(x) -> Devil(x, dorian))\n\nDevil(evangelia, dorian)\n\nforall x (Eutherian(x) and not Slanted(x) -> Devil(x, dorian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The burgess inspissate the krystal. The krystal is welcoming. The shannah shuck the harli. The harli is not welcoming. If something inspissate the burgess and it shuck the burgess then the burgess is welcoming. If something inspissate the krystal then the krystal is not square. If something is square and it shuck the burgess then the burgess shuck the shannah. If the harli personate the burgess and the harli does not see the burgess then the burgess shuck the krystal. If something inspissate the harli then the harli shuck the krystal. If something is welcoming and not square then it inspissate the harli. The harli does not see the harli.", "logic": "\nInspissate(burgess, krystal)\nWelcoming(krystal)\nShuck(shannah, harli)\nnot Welcoming(harli)\nforall x (Inspissate(x, burgess) and Shuck(x, burgess) -> Welcoming(burgess))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, krystal) -> not Square(krystal))\nforall x (Square(x) and Shuck(x, burgess) -> Shuck(burgess, shannah))\nPersonate(harli, burgess) and not Inspissate(harli, burgess) -> Shuck(burgess, krystal)\nforall x (Inspissate(x, harli) -> Shuck(harli, krystal))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) and not Square(x) -> Inspissate(x, harli))\n\nnot Inspissate(harli, harli)\n\nforall x (Welcoming(x) and not Square(x) -> Inspissate(x, harli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The sonni belt the hailee. The hailee is lowbrowed. The olivia crosscut the trenton. The trenton is not lowbrowed. If something belt the sonni and it crosscut the sonni then the sonni is lowbrowed. If something belt the hailee then the hailee is not arched. If something is arched and it crosscut the sonni then the sonni crosscut the olivia. If the trenton abstract the sonni and the trenton does not see the sonni then the sonni crosscut the hailee. If something belt the trenton then the trenton crosscut the hailee. If something is lowbrowed and not arched then it belt the trenton. The sonni is lowbrowed.", "logic": "\nBelt(sonni, hailee)\nLowbrowed(hailee)\nCrosscut(olivia, trenton)\nnot Lowbrowed(trenton)\nforall x (Belt(x, sonni) and Crosscut(x, sonni) -> Lowbrowed(sonni))\nforall x (Belt(x, hailee) -> not Arched(hailee))\nforall x (Arched(x) and Crosscut(x, sonni) -> Crosscut(sonni, olivia))\nAbstract(trenton, sonni) and not Belt(trenton, sonni) -> Crosscut(sonni, hailee)\nforall x (Belt(x, trenton) -> Crosscut(trenton, hailee))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) and not Arched(x) -> Belt(x, trenton))\n\nLowbrowed(sonni)\n\nforall x (Belt(x, sonni) and Crosscut(x, sonni) -> Lowbrowed(sonni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The loria alloy the clarinda. The clarinda is lxxxviii. The star preview the malcah. The malcah is not lxxxviii. If something alloy the loria and it preview the loria then the loria is lxxxviii. If something alloy the clarinda then the clarinda is not related. If something is related and it preview the loria then the loria preview the star. If the malcah flyfish the loria and the malcah does not see the loria then the loria preview the clarinda. If something alloy the malcah then the malcah preview the clarinda. If something is lxxxviii and not related then it alloy the malcah. The star does not see the loria.", "logic": "\nAlloy(loria, clarinda)\nLxxxviii(clarinda)\nPreview(star, malcah)\nnot Lxxxviii(malcah)\nforall x (Alloy(x, loria) and Preview(x, loria) -> Lxxxviii(loria))\nforall x (Alloy(x, clarinda) -> not Related(clarinda))\nforall x (Related(x) and Preview(x, loria) -> Preview(loria, star))\nFlyfish(malcah, loria) and not Alloy(malcah, loria) -> Preview(loria, clarinda)\nforall x (Alloy(x, malcah) -> Preview(malcah, clarinda))\nforall x (Lxxxviii(x) and not Related(x) -> Alloy(x, malcah))\n\nnot Alloy(star, loria)\n\nnot Alloy(star, loria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The skylar misgauge the kelsi. The kelsi is cypriote. The lucilia ransom the krissy. The krissy is not cypriote. If something misgauge the skylar and it ransom the skylar then the skylar is cypriote. If something misgauge the kelsi then the kelsi is not palmatifid. If something is palmatifid and it ransom the skylar then the skylar ransom the lucilia. If the krissy decolonise the skylar and the krissy does not see the skylar then the skylar ransom the kelsi. If something misgauge the krissy then the krissy ransom the kelsi. If something is cypriote and not palmatifid then it misgauge the krissy. The lucilia misgauge the lucilia.", "logic": "\nMisgauge(skylar, kelsi)\nCypriote(kelsi)\nRansom(lucilia, krissy)\nnot Cypriote(krissy)\nforall x (Misgauge(x, skylar) and Ransom(x, skylar) -> Cypriote(skylar))\nforall x (Misgauge(x, kelsi) -> not Palmatifid(kelsi))\nforall x (Palmatifid(x) and Ransom(x, skylar) -> Ransom(skylar, lucilia))\nDecolonise(krissy, skylar) and not Misgauge(krissy, skylar) -> Ransom(skylar, kelsi)\nforall x (Misgauge(x, krissy) -> Ransom(krissy, kelsi))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) and not Palmatifid(x) -> Misgauge(x, krissy))\n\nMisgauge(lucilia, lucilia)\n\nMisgauge(lucilia, lucilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The reggy sync the nyssa. The nyssa is aboral. The eilis empanel the caren. The caren is not aboral. If something sync the reggy and it empanel the reggy then the reggy is aboral. If something sync the nyssa then the nyssa is not arctic. If something is arctic and it empanel the reggy then the reggy empanel the eilis. If the caren detoxicate the reggy and the caren does not see the reggy then the reggy empanel the nyssa. If something sync the caren then the caren empanel the nyssa. If something is aboral and not arctic then it sync the caren. The reggy does not see the eilis.", "logic": "\nSync(reggy, nyssa)\nAboral(nyssa)\nEmpanel(eilis, caren)\nnot Aboral(caren)\nforall x (Sync(x, reggy) and Empanel(x, reggy) -> Aboral(reggy))\nforall x (Sync(x, nyssa) -> not Arctic(nyssa))\nforall x (Arctic(x) and Empanel(x, reggy) -> Empanel(reggy, eilis))\nDetoxicate(caren, reggy) and not Sync(caren, reggy) -> Empanel(reggy, nyssa)\nforall x (Sync(x, caren) -> Empanel(caren, nyssa))\nforall x (Aboral(x) and not Arctic(x) -> Sync(x, caren))\n\nnot Sync(reggy, eilis)\n\nnot Sync(reggy, eilis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "The arturo abbreviate the elicia. The elicia is unrepaired. The kassandra demise the tully. The tully is not unrepaired. If something abbreviate the arturo and it demise the arturo then the arturo is unrepaired. If something abbreviate the elicia then the elicia is not safe. If something is safe and it demise the arturo then the arturo demise the kassandra. If the tully remedy the arturo and the tully does not see the arturo then the arturo demise the elicia. If something abbreviate the tully then the tully demise the elicia. If something is unrepaired and not safe then it abbreviate the tully. The arturo is cold.", "logic": "\nAbbreviate(arturo, elicia)\nUnrepaired(elicia)\nDemise(kassandra, tully)\nnot Unrepaired(tully)\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, arturo) and Demise(x, arturo) -> Unrepaired(arturo))\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, elicia) -> not Safe(elicia))\nforall x (Safe(x) and Demise(x, arturo) -> Demise(arturo, kassandra))\nRemedy(tully, arturo) and not Abbreviate(tully, arturo) -> Demise(arturo, elicia)\nforall x (Abbreviate(x, tully) -> Demise(tully, elicia))\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) and not Safe(x) -> Abbreviate(x, tully))\n\nCold(arturo)\n\nCold(arturo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-755"} {"premises": "Clinton is allegretto. Clinton is regular. Clinton is postmortem. Clinton is carefree. Suzanne is not allegretto. Suzanne is regular. Suzanne is marauding. Suzanne is verbatim. Suzanne is carefree. Dulcie is not allegretto. Dulcie is not postmortem. Dulcie is bodyless. Dena is allegretto. Dena is postmortem. Dena is verbatim. If something is verbatim then it is marauding. If something is carefree and allegretto then it is marauding. If something is marauding and allegretto then it is bodyless. All carefree, postmortem things are bodyless. Smart things are carefree. If Dulcie is postmortem and Dulcie is regular then Dulcie is not marauding. All postmortem, carefree things are verbatim. All bodyless, marauding things are postmortem. Clinton is regular.", "logic": "\nAllegretto(clinton)\nRegular(clinton)\nPostmortem(clinton)\nCarefree(clinton)\nnot Allegretto(suzanne)\nRegular(suzanne)\nMarauding(suzanne)\nVerbatim(suzanne)\nCarefree(suzanne)\nnot Allegretto(dulcie)\nnot Postmortem(dulcie)\nBodyless(dulcie)\nAllegretto(dena)\nPostmortem(dena)\nVerbatim(dena)\nforall x (Verbatim(x) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Allegretto(x) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Marauding(x) and Allegretto(x) -> Bodyless(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Postmortem(x) -> Bodyless(x))\nforall x (Bodyless(x) -> Carefree(x))\nPostmortem(dulcie) and Regular(dulcie) -> not Marauding(dulcie)\nforall x (Postmortem(x) and Carefree(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Bodyless(x) and Marauding(x) -> Postmortem(x))\n\nRegular(clinton)\n\ntherefore Regular(clinton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Candace is unmade. Candace is assonant. Candace is allowable. Candace is saclike. Raynell is not unmade. Raynell is assonant. Raynell is eightieth. Raynell is sapphirine. Raynell is saclike. Maribeth is not unmade. Maribeth is not allowable. Maribeth is apposable. Mira is unmade. Mira is allowable. Mira is sapphirine. If something is sapphirine then it is eightieth. If something is saclike and unmade then it is eightieth. If something is eightieth and unmade then it is apposable. All saclike, allowable things are apposable. Smart things are saclike. If Maribeth is allowable and Maribeth is assonant then Maribeth is not eightieth. All allowable, saclike things are sapphirine. All apposable, eightieth things are allowable. Maribeth is allowable.", "logic": "\nUnmade(candace)\nAssonant(candace)\nAllowable(candace)\nSaclike(candace)\nnot Unmade(raynell)\nAssonant(raynell)\nEightieth(raynell)\nSapphirine(raynell)\nSaclike(raynell)\nnot Unmade(maribeth)\nnot Allowable(maribeth)\nApposable(maribeth)\nUnmade(mira)\nAllowable(mira)\nSapphirine(mira)\nforall x (Sapphirine(x) -> Eightieth(x))\nforall x (Saclike(x) and Unmade(x) -> Eightieth(x))\nforall x (Eightieth(x) and Unmade(x) -> Apposable(x))\nforall x (Saclike(x) and Allowable(x) -> Apposable(x))\nforall x (Apposable(x) -> Saclike(x))\nAllowable(maribeth) and Assonant(maribeth) -> not Eightieth(maribeth)\nforall x (Allowable(x) and Saclike(x) -> Sapphirine(x))\nforall x (Apposable(x) and Eightieth(x) -> Allowable(x))\n\nAllowable(maribeth)\n\ntherefore not Allowable(maribeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Annalise is quality. Annalise is oppressive. Annalise is voltaic. Annalise is woolly. Tarzan is not quality. Tarzan is oppressive. Tarzan is recursive. Tarzan is anasarcous. Tarzan is woolly. Elysia is not quality. Elysia is not voltaic. Elysia is roiled. Prescott is quality. Prescott is voltaic. Prescott is anasarcous. If something is anasarcous then it is recursive. If something is woolly and quality then it is recursive. If something is recursive and quality then it is roiled. All woolly, voltaic things are roiled. Smart things are woolly. If Elysia is voltaic and Elysia is oppressive then Elysia is not recursive. All voltaic, woolly things are anasarcous. All roiled, recursive things are voltaic. Annalise is anasarcous.", "logic": "\nQuality(annalise)\nOppressive(annalise)\nVoltaic(annalise)\nWoolly(annalise)\nnot Quality(tarzan)\nOppressive(tarzan)\nRecursive(tarzan)\nAnasarcous(tarzan)\nWoolly(tarzan)\nnot Quality(elysia)\nnot Voltaic(elysia)\nRoiled(elysia)\nQuality(prescott)\nVoltaic(prescott)\nAnasarcous(prescott)\nforall x (Anasarcous(x) -> Recursive(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) and Quality(x) -> Recursive(x))\nforall x (Recursive(x) and Quality(x) -> Roiled(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) and Voltaic(x) -> Roiled(x))\nforall x (Roiled(x) -> Woolly(x))\nVoltaic(elysia) and Oppressive(elysia) -> not Recursive(elysia)\nforall x (Voltaic(x) and Woolly(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nforall x (Roiled(x) and Recursive(x) -> Voltaic(x))\n\nAnasarcous(annalise)\n\nVoltaic(annalise) and Woolly(annalise) and forall x (Voltaic(x) and Woolly(x) -> Anasarcous(x)) -> therefore Anasarcous(annalise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Alexina is otherwise. Alexina is concerted. Alexina is insentient. Alexina is lofty. Phip is not otherwise. Phip is concerted. Phip is trivalent. Phip is noisy. Phip is lofty. Truman is not otherwise. Truman is not insentient. Truman is acritical. Greta is otherwise. Greta is insentient. Greta is noisy. If something is noisy then it is trivalent. If something is lofty and otherwise then it is trivalent. If something is trivalent and otherwise then it is acritical. All lofty, insentient things are acritical. Smart things are lofty. If Truman is insentient and Truman is concerted then Truman is not trivalent. All insentient, lofty things are noisy. All acritical, trivalent things are insentient. Alexina is not acritical.", "logic": "\nOtherwise(alexina)\nConcerted(alexina)\nInsentient(alexina)\nLofty(alexina)\nnot Otherwise(phip)\nConcerted(phip)\nTrivalent(phip)\nNoisy(phip)\nLofty(phip)\nnot Otherwise(truman)\nnot Insentient(truman)\nAcritical(truman)\nOtherwise(greta)\nInsentient(greta)\nNoisy(greta)\nforall x (Noisy(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) and Otherwise(x) -> Trivalent(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) and Otherwise(x) -> Acritical(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) and Insentient(x) -> Acritical(x))\nforall x (Acritical(x) -> Lofty(x))\nInsentient(truman) and Concerted(truman) -> not Trivalent(truman)\nforall x (Insentient(x) and Lofty(x) -> Noisy(x))\nforall x (Acritical(x) and Trivalent(x) -> Insentient(x))\n\nnot Acritical(alexina)\n\nLofty(alexina) and Insentient(alexina) and forall x (Lofty(x) and Insentient(x) -> Acritical(x)) -> therefore Acritical(alexina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Caroline is troubled. Caroline is deniable. Caroline is arrayed. Caroline is equal. Nelson is not troubled. Nelson is deniable. Nelson is apophatic. Nelson is thievish. Nelson is equal. Yuri is not troubled. Yuri is not arrayed. Yuri is flowerless. Tiphany is troubled. Tiphany is arrayed. Tiphany is thievish. If something is thievish then it is apophatic. If something is equal and troubled then it is apophatic. If something is apophatic and troubled then it is flowerless. All equal, arrayed things are flowerless. Smart things are equal. If Yuri is arrayed and Yuri is deniable then Yuri is not apophatic. All arrayed, equal things are thievish. All flowerless, apophatic things are arrayed. Tiphany is flowerless.", "logic": "\nTroubled(caroline)\nDeniable(caroline)\nArrayed(caroline)\nEqual(caroline)\nnot Troubled(nelson)\nDeniable(nelson)\nApophatic(nelson)\nThievish(nelson)\nEqual(nelson)\nnot Troubled(yuri)\nnot Arrayed(yuri)\nFlowerless(yuri)\nTroubled(tiphany)\nArrayed(tiphany)\nThievish(tiphany)\nforall x (Thievish(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Equal(x) and Troubled(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) and Troubled(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Equal(x) and Arrayed(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) -> Equal(x))\nArrayed(yuri) and Deniable(yuri) -> not Apophatic(yuri)\nforall x (Arrayed(x) and Equal(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) and Apophatic(x) -> Arrayed(x))\n\nFlowerless(tiphany)\n\nThievish(tiphany) and forall x (Thievish(x) -> Apophatic(x)) -> therefore Apophatic(tiphany) Apophatic(tiphany) and Troubled(tiphany) and forall x (Apophatic(x) and Troubled(x) -> Flowerless(x)) -> therefore Flowerless(tiphany)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Troy is crenulated. Troy is ampullar. Troy is benthonic. Troy is decent. Cyrille is not crenulated. Cyrille is ampullar. Cyrille is runproof. Cyrille is arsenical. Cyrille is decent. Roana is not crenulated. Roana is not benthonic. Roana is syntactic. Aggi is crenulated. Aggi is benthonic. Aggi is arsenical. If something is arsenical then it is runproof. If something is decent and crenulated then it is runproof. If something is runproof and crenulated then it is syntactic. All decent, benthonic things are syntactic. Smart things are decent. If Roana is benthonic and Roana is ampullar then Roana is not runproof. All benthonic, decent things are arsenical. All syntactic, runproof things are benthonic. Aggi is not syntactic.", "logic": "\nCrenulated(troy)\nAmpullar(troy)\nBenthonic(troy)\nDecent(troy)\nnot Crenulated(cyrille)\nAmpullar(cyrille)\nRunproof(cyrille)\nArsenical(cyrille)\nDecent(cyrille)\nnot Crenulated(roana)\nnot Benthonic(roana)\nSyntactic(roana)\nCrenulated(aggi)\nBenthonic(aggi)\nArsenical(aggi)\nforall x (Arsenical(x) -> Runproof(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) and Crenulated(x) -> Runproof(x))\nforall x (Runproof(x) and Crenulated(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) and Benthonic(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) -> Decent(x))\nBenthonic(roana) and Ampullar(roana) -> not Runproof(roana)\nforall x (Benthonic(x) and Decent(x) -> Arsenical(x))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) and Runproof(x) -> Benthonic(x))\n\nnot Syntactic(aggi)\n\nArsenical(aggi) and forall x (Arsenical(x) -> Runproof(x)) -> therefore Runproof(aggi) Runproof(aggi) and Crenulated(aggi) and forall x (Runproof(x) and Crenulated(x) -> Syntactic(x)) -> therefore Syntactic(aggi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Allis is blissful. Allis is impassable. Allis is flaunty. Allis is perceptual. Bliss is not blissful. Bliss is impassable. Bliss is autogenic. Bliss is kampuchean. Bliss is perceptual. Elaine is not blissful. Elaine is not flaunty. Elaine is sylvan. Sol is blissful. Sol is flaunty. Sol is kampuchean. If something is kampuchean then it is autogenic. If something is perceptual and blissful then it is autogenic. If something is autogenic and blissful then it is sylvan. All perceptual, flaunty things are sylvan. Smart things are perceptual. If Elaine is flaunty and Elaine is impassable then Elaine is not autogenic. All flaunty, perceptual things are kampuchean. All sylvan, autogenic things are flaunty. Sol is perceptual.", "logic": "\nBlissful(allis)\nImpassable(allis)\nFlaunty(allis)\nPerceptual(allis)\nnot Blissful(bliss)\nImpassable(bliss)\nAutogenic(bliss)\nKampuchean(bliss)\nPerceptual(bliss)\nnot Blissful(elaine)\nnot Flaunty(elaine)\nSylvan(elaine)\nBlissful(sol)\nFlaunty(sol)\nKampuchean(sol)\nforall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Autogenic(x))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) and Blissful(x) -> Autogenic(x))\nforall x (Autogenic(x) and Blissful(x) -> Sylvan(x))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) and Flaunty(x) -> Sylvan(x))\nforall x (Sylvan(x) -> Perceptual(x))\nFlaunty(elaine) and Impassable(elaine) -> not Autogenic(elaine)\nforall x (Flaunty(x) and Perceptual(x) -> Kampuchean(x))\nforall x (Sylvan(x) and Autogenic(x) -> Flaunty(x))\n\nPerceptual(sol)\n\nKampuchean(sol) and forall x (Kampuchean(x) -> Autogenic(x)) -> therefore Autogenic(sol) Autogenic(sol) and Blissful(sol) and forall x (Autogenic(x) and Blissful(x) -> Sylvan(x)) -> therefore Sylvan(sol) Sylvan(sol) and forall x (Sylvan(x) -> Perceptual(x)) -> therefore Perceptual(sol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Tyson is tapped. Tyson is dexterous. Tyson is gold. Tyson is frantic. Kristos is not tapped. Kristos is dexterous. Kristos is trusted. Kristos is mincing. Kristos is frantic. Nickie is not tapped. Nickie is not gold. Nickie is invasive. Carita is tapped. Carita is gold. Carita is mincing. If something is mincing then it is trusted. If something is frantic and tapped then it is trusted. If something is trusted and tapped then it is invasive. All frantic, gold things are invasive. Smart things are frantic. If Nickie is gold and Nickie is dexterous then Nickie is not trusted. All gold, frantic things are mincing. All invasive, trusted things are gold. Carita is not frantic.", "logic": "\nTapped(tyson)\nDexterous(tyson)\nGold(tyson)\nFrantic(tyson)\nnot Tapped(kristos)\nDexterous(kristos)\nTrusted(kristos)\nMincing(kristos)\nFrantic(kristos)\nnot Tapped(nickie)\nnot Gold(nickie)\nInvasive(nickie)\nTapped(carita)\nGold(carita)\nMincing(carita)\nforall x (Mincing(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Frantic(x) and Tapped(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Trusted(x) and Tapped(x) -> Invasive(x))\nforall x (Frantic(x) and Gold(x) -> Invasive(x))\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Frantic(x))\nGold(nickie) and Dexterous(nickie) -> not Trusted(nickie)\nforall x (Gold(x) and Frantic(x) -> Mincing(x))\nforall x (Invasive(x) and Trusted(x) -> Gold(x))\n\nnot Frantic(carita)\n\nMincing(carita) and forall x (Mincing(x) -> Trusted(x)) -> therefore Trusted(carita) Trusted(carita) and Tapped(carita) and forall x (Trusted(x) and Tapped(x) -> Invasive(x)) -> therefore Invasive(carita) Invasive(carita) and forall x (Invasive(x) -> Frantic(x)) -> therefore Frantic(carita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Jaleh is nonbearing. Jaleh is egoistical. Jaleh is harassed. Jaleh is unloving. Garvy is not nonbearing. Garvy is egoistical. Garvy is impeding. Garvy is faced. Garvy is unloving. Randolf is not nonbearing. Randolf is not harassed. Randolf is prosperous. Morry is nonbearing. Morry is harassed. Morry is faced. If something is faced then it is impeding. If something is unloving and nonbearing then it is impeding. If something is impeding and nonbearing then it is prosperous. All unloving, harassed things are prosperous. Smart things are unloving. If Randolf is harassed and Randolf is egoistical then Randolf is not impeding. All harassed, unloving things are faced. All prosperous, impeding things are harassed. Randolf is not impeding.", "logic": "\nNonbearing(jaleh)\nEgoistical(jaleh)\nHarassed(jaleh)\nUnloving(jaleh)\nnot Nonbearing(garvy)\nEgoistical(garvy)\nImpeding(garvy)\nFaced(garvy)\nUnloving(garvy)\nnot Nonbearing(randolf)\nnot Harassed(randolf)\nProsperous(randolf)\nNonbearing(morry)\nHarassed(morry)\nFaced(morry)\nforall x (Faced(x) -> Impeding(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) and Nonbearing(x) -> Impeding(x))\nforall x (Impeding(x) and Nonbearing(x) -> Prosperous(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) and Harassed(x) -> Prosperous(x))\nforall x (Prosperous(x) -> Unloving(x))\nHarassed(randolf) and Egoistical(randolf) -> not Impeding(randolf)\nforall x (Harassed(x) and Unloving(x) -> Faced(x))\nforall x (Prosperous(x) and Impeding(x) -> Harassed(x))\n\nnot Impeding(randolf)\n\nforall x (Faced(x) -> Impeding(x)) <- forall x (Harassed(x) and Unloving(x) -> Faced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Bobinette is hammered. Bobinette is upbeat. Bobinette is efferent. Bobinette is cumbersome. Spencer is not hammered. Spencer is upbeat. Spencer is lusterless. Spencer is dyspneic. Spencer is cumbersome. Lianna is not hammered. Lianna is not efferent. Lianna is churchly. Con is hammered. Con is efferent. Con is dyspneic. If something is dyspneic then it is lusterless. If something is cumbersome and hammered then it is lusterless. If something is lusterless and hammered then it is churchly. All cumbersome, efferent things are churchly. Smart things are cumbersome. If Lianna is efferent and Lianna is upbeat then Lianna is not lusterless. All efferent, cumbersome things are dyspneic. All churchly, lusterless things are efferent. Spencer is efferent.", "logic": "\nHammered(bobinette)\nUpbeat(bobinette)\nEfferent(bobinette)\nCumbersome(bobinette)\nnot Hammered(spencer)\nUpbeat(spencer)\nLusterless(spencer)\nDyspneic(spencer)\nCumbersome(spencer)\nnot Hammered(lianna)\nnot Efferent(lianna)\nChurchly(lianna)\nHammered(con)\nEfferent(con)\nDyspneic(con)\nforall x (Dyspneic(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nforall x (Cumbersome(x) and Hammered(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) and Hammered(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Cumbersome(x) and Efferent(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Cumbersome(x))\nEfferent(lianna) and Upbeat(lianna) -> not Lusterless(lianna)\nforall x (Efferent(x) and Cumbersome(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) and Lusterless(x) -> Efferent(x))\n\nEfferent(spencer)\n\nforall x (Churchly(x) and Lusterless(x) -> Efferent(x)) <- forall x (Lusterless(x) and Hammered(x) -> Churchly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Sax is aberrant. Sax is ionic. Sax is indigenous. Sax is mythic. Kathlin is not aberrant. Kathlin is ionic. Kathlin is parked. Kathlin is incisive. Kathlin is mythic. Terri is not aberrant. Terri is not indigenous. Terri is relocated. Vida is aberrant. Vida is indigenous. Vida is incisive. If something is incisive then it is parked. If something is mythic and aberrant then it is parked. If something is parked and aberrant then it is relocated. All mythic, indigenous things are relocated. Smart things are mythic. If Terri is indigenous and Terri is ionic then Terri is not parked. All indigenous, mythic things are incisive. All relocated, parked things are indigenous. Kathlin is not relocated.", "logic": "\nAberrant(sax)\nIonic(sax)\nIndigenous(sax)\nMythic(sax)\nnot Aberrant(kathlin)\nIonic(kathlin)\nParked(kathlin)\nIncisive(kathlin)\nMythic(kathlin)\nnot Aberrant(terri)\nnot Indigenous(terri)\nRelocated(terri)\nAberrant(vida)\nIndigenous(vida)\nIncisive(vida)\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Parked(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Aberrant(x) -> Parked(x))\nforall x (Parked(x) and Aberrant(x) -> Relocated(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Indigenous(x) -> Relocated(x))\nforall x (Relocated(x) -> Mythic(x))\nIndigenous(terri) and Ionic(terri) -> not Parked(terri)\nforall x (Indigenous(x) and Mythic(x) -> Incisive(x))\nforall x (Relocated(x) and Parked(x) -> Indigenous(x))\n\nnot Relocated(kathlin)\n\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Indigenous(x) -> Relocated(x)) <- forall x (Relocated(x) and Parked(x) -> Indigenous(x)) <- forall x (Parked(x) and Aberrant(x) -> Relocated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Fredrika is cosmogonic. Fredrika is brushed. Fredrika is limiting. Fredrika is choosey. Elayne is not cosmogonic. Elayne is brushed. Elayne is unremarked. Elayne is mongol. Elayne is choosey. Marten is not cosmogonic. Marten is not limiting. Marten is butcherly. Ric is cosmogonic. Ric is limiting. Ric is mongol. If something is mongol then it is unremarked. If something is choosey and cosmogonic then it is unremarked. If something is unremarked and cosmogonic then it is butcherly. All choosey, limiting things are butcherly. Smart things are choosey. If Marten is limiting and Marten is brushed then Marten is not unremarked. All limiting, choosey things are mongol. All butcherly, unremarked things are limiting. Marten is mongol.", "logic": "\nCosmogonic(fredrika)\nBrushed(fredrika)\nLimiting(fredrika)\nChoosey(fredrika)\nnot Cosmogonic(elayne)\nBrushed(elayne)\nUnremarked(elayne)\nMongol(elayne)\nChoosey(elayne)\nnot Cosmogonic(marten)\nnot Limiting(marten)\nButcherly(marten)\nCosmogonic(ric)\nLimiting(ric)\nMongol(ric)\nforall x (Mongol(x) -> Unremarked(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Unremarked(x))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) and Limiting(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Choosey(x))\nLimiting(marten) and Brushed(marten) -> not Unremarked(marten)\nforall x (Limiting(x) and Choosey(x) -> Mongol(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) and Unremarked(x) -> Limiting(x))\n\nMongol(marten)\n\nforall x (Limiting(x) and Choosey(x) -> Mongol(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "Urbano is unfitting. Urbano is afghan. Urbano is spousal. Urbano is shrunken. Tandie is not unfitting. Tandie is afghan. Tandie is xciv. Tandie is cartesian. Tandie is shrunken. Aleen is not unfitting. Aleen is not spousal. Aleen is archducal. Rudolfo is unfitting. Rudolfo is spousal. Rudolfo is cartesian. If something is cartesian then it is xciv. If something is shrunken and unfitting then it is xciv. If something is xciv and unfitting then it is archducal. All shrunken, spousal things are archducal. Smart things are shrunken. If Aleen is spousal and Aleen is afghan then Aleen is not xciv. All spousal, shrunken things are cartesian. All archducal, xciv things are spousal. Rudolfo is not afghan.", "logic": "\nUnfitting(urbano)\nAfghan(urbano)\nSpousal(urbano)\nShrunken(urbano)\nnot Unfitting(tandie)\nAfghan(tandie)\nXciv(tandie)\nCartesian(tandie)\nShrunken(tandie)\nnot Unfitting(aleen)\nnot Spousal(aleen)\nArchducal(aleen)\nUnfitting(rudolfo)\nSpousal(rudolfo)\nCartesian(rudolfo)\nforall x (Cartesian(x) -> Xciv(x))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) and Unfitting(x) -> Xciv(x))\nforall x (Xciv(x) and Unfitting(x) -> Archducal(x))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) and Spousal(x) -> Archducal(x))\nforall x (Archducal(x) -> Shrunken(x))\nSpousal(aleen) and Afghan(aleen) -> not Xciv(aleen)\nforall x (Spousal(x) and Shrunken(x) -> Cartesian(x))\nforall x (Archducal(x) and Xciv(x) -> Spousal(x))\n\nnot Afghan(rudolfo)\n\nnot Afghan(rudolfo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "June is depicted. June is played. June is lviii. June is didactical. Bobbi is not depicted. Bobbi is played. Bobbi is stateless. Bobbi is watertight. Bobbi is didactical. Elle is not depicted. Elle is not lviii. Elle is aboveboard. Luise is depicted. Luise is lviii. Luise is watertight. If something is watertight then it is stateless. If something is didactical and depicted then it is stateless. If something is stateless and depicted then it is aboveboard. All didactical, lviii things are aboveboard. Smart things are didactical. If Elle is lviii and Elle is played then Elle is not stateless. All lviii, didactical things are watertight. All aboveboard, stateless things are lviii. Elle is played.", "logic": "\nDepicted(june)\nPlayed(june)\nLviii(june)\nDidactical(june)\nnot Depicted(bobbi)\nPlayed(bobbi)\nStateless(bobbi)\nWatertight(bobbi)\nDidactical(bobbi)\nnot Depicted(elle)\nnot Lviii(elle)\nAboveboard(elle)\nDepicted(luise)\nLviii(luise)\nWatertight(luise)\nforall x (Watertight(x) -> Stateless(x))\nforall x (Didactical(x) and Depicted(x) -> Stateless(x))\nforall x (Stateless(x) and Depicted(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Didactical(x) and Lviii(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Didactical(x))\nLviii(elle) and Played(elle) -> not Stateless(elle)\nforall x (Lviii(x) and Didactical(x) -> Watertight(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) and Stateless(x) -> Lviii(x))\n\nPlayed(elle)\n\nPlayed(elle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-391"} {"premises": "The leesa is unusual. The leesa is precursory. The leesa vent the ofelia. The leesa vent the averyl. The ofelia stridulate the averyl. The ofelia is immortal. The ofelia trademark the averyl. The ofelia vent the averyl. The averyl trademark the leesa. The averyl vent the leesa. If someone vent the averyl then the averyl is blest. If someone stridulate the averyl then the averyl trademark the ofelia. If someone stridulate the leesa then the leesa is blest. If someone trademark the leesa then they see the leesa. If someone trademark the averyl and the averyl is immortal then they chase the leesa. If the leesa is immortal and the leesa vent the averyl then the averyl vent the ofelia. The leesa vent the ofelia.", "logic": "\nUnusual(leesa)\nPrecursory(leesa)\nVent(leesa, ofelia)\nVent(leesa, averyl)\nStridulate(ofelia, averyl)\nImmortal(ofelia)\nTrademark(ofelia, averyl)\nVent(ofelia, averyl)\nTrademark(averyl, leesa)\nVent(averyl, leesa)\nforall x (Vent(x, averyl) -> Blest(averyl))\nforall x (Stridulate(x, averyl) -> Trademark(averyl, ofelia))\nforall x (Stridulate(x, leesa) -> Blest(leesa))\nforall x (Trademark(x, leesa) -> Vent(x, leesa))\nforall x (Trademark(x, averyl) and Immortal(averyl) -> Stridulate(x, leesa))\nImmortal(leesa) and Vent(leesa, averyl) -> Vent(averyl, ofelia)\n\nVent(leesa, ofelia)\n\ntherefore Vent(leesa, ofelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1869"} {"premises": "The glynn is serious. The glynn is neotenous. The glynn skipper the hansel. The glynn skipper the gertie. The hansel socialize the gertie. The hansel is agonadal. The hansel butcher the gertie. The hansel skipper the gertie. The gertie butcher the glynn. The gertie skipper the glynn. If someone skipper the gertie then the gertie is axillary. If someone socialize the gertie then the gertie butcher the hansel. If someone socialize the glynn then the glynn is axillary. If someone butcher the glynn then they see the glynn. If someone butcher the gertie and the gertie is agonadal then they chase the glynn. If the glynn is agonadal and the glynn skipper the gertie then the gertie skipper the hansel. The gertie does not see the glynn.", "logic": "\nSerious(glynn)\nNeotenous(glynn)\nSkipper(glynn, hansel)\nSkipper(glynn, gertie)\nSocialize(hansel, gertie)\nAgonadal(hansel)\nButcher(hansel, gertie)\nSkipper(hansel, gertie)\nButcher(gertie, glynn)\nSkipper(gertie, glynn)\nforall x (Skipper(x, gertie) -> Axillary(gertie))\nforall x (Socialize(x, gertie) -> Butcher(gertie, hansel))\nforall x (Socialize(x, glynn) -> Axillary(glynn))\nforall x (Butcher(x, glynn) -> Skipper(x, glynn))\nforall x (Butcher(x, gertie) and Agonadal(gertie) -> Socialize(x, glynn))\nAgonadal(glynn) and Skipper(glynn, gertie) -> Skipper(gertie, hansel)\n\nnot Skipper(gertie, glynn)\n\ntherefore Skipper(gertie, glynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1869"} {"premises": "The dwane is aciduric. The dwane is permeable. The dwane parcel the shoshana. The dwane parcel the shilpa. The shoshana traduce the shilpa. The shoshana is caruncular. The shoshana walk the shilpa. The shoshana parcel the shilpa. The shilpa walk the dwane. The shilpa parcel the dwane. If someone parcel the shilpa then the shilpa is ephesian. If someone traduce the shilpa then the shilpa walk the shoshana. If someone traduce the dwane then the dwane is ephesian. If someone walk the dwane then they see the dwane. If someone walk the shilpa and the shilpa is caruncular then they chase the dwane. If the dwane is caruncular and the dwane parcel the shilpa then the shilpa parcel the shoshana. The shoshana does not chase the dwane.", "logic": "\nAciduric(dwane)\nPermeable(dwane)\nParcel(dwane, shoshana)\nParcel(dwane, shilpa)\nTraduce(shoshana, shilpa)\nCaruncular(shoshana)\nWalk(shoshana, shilpa)\nParcel(shoshana, shilpa)\nWalk(shilpa, dwane)\nParcel(shilpa, dwane)\nforall x (Parcel(x, shilpa) -> Ephesian(shilpa))\nforall x (Traduce(x, shilpa) -> Walk(shilpa, shoshana))\nforall x (Traduce(x, dwane) -> Ephesian(dwane))\nforall x (Walk(x, dwane) -> Parcel(x, dwane))\nforall x (Walk(x, shilpa) and Caruncular(shilpa) -> Traduce(x, dwane))\nCaruncular(dwane) and Parcel(dwane, shilpa) -> Parcel(shilpa, shoshana)\n\nnot Traduce(shoshana, dwane)\n\nforall x (Walk(x, shilpa) and Caruncular(shilpa) -> Traduce(x, dwane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1869"} {"premises": "The jerrome is deceptive. The jerrome is roiling. The jerrome traffic the haywood. The jerrome traffic the amata. The haywood foredoom the amata. The haywood is concrete. The haywood trample the amata. The haywood traffic the amata. The amata trample the jerrome. The amata traffic the jerrome. If someone traffic the amata then the amata is geodetic. If someone foredoom the amata then the amata trample the haywood. If someone foredoom the jerrome then the jerrome is geodetic. If someone trample the jerrome then they see the jerrome. If someone trample the amata and the amata is concrete then they chase the jerrome. If the jerrome is concrete and the jerrome traffic the amata then the amata traffic the haywood. The haywood is deceptive.", "logic": "\nDeceptive(jerrome)\nRoiling(jerrome)\nTraffic(jerrome, haywood)\nTraffic(jerrome, amata)\nForedoom(haywood, amata)\nConcrete(haywood)\nTrample(haywood, amata)\nTraffic(haywood, amata)\nTrample(amata, jerrome)\nTraffic(amata, jerrome)\nforall x (Traffic(x, amata) -> Geodetic(amata))\nforall x (Foredoom(x, amata) -> Trample(amata, haywood))\nforall x (Foredoom(x, jerrome) -> Geodetic(jerrome))\nforall x (Trample(x, jerrome) -> Traffic(x, jerrome))\nforall x (Trample(x, amata) and Concrete(amata) -> Foredoom(x, jerrome))\nConcrete(jerrome) and Traffic(jerrome, amata) -> Traffic(amata, haywood)\n\nDeceptive(haywood)\n\nDeceptive(haywood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1869"} {"premises": "The gert dillydally the shelba. The gert toggle the shelba. The gert is herculean. The gert is rubber. The gert is airless. The gert is haploidic. The gert is tahitian. The gert shirk the shelba. The shelba dillydally the gert. The shelba toggle the gert. The shelba is herculean. The shelba is rubber. The shelba is airless. The shelba is haploidic. The shelba is tahitian. The shelba shirk the gert. If something is airless then it toggle the shelba. If something dillydally the shelba and it is herculean then it is airless. If something is tahitian and it dillydally the shelba then it shirk the shelba. If something shirk the gert then it toggle the gert. If something toggle the shelba and it dillydally the gert then it shirk the shelba. If something dillydally the gert and it shirk the shelba then the shelba is airless. If something is airless and it dillydally the gert then the gert toggle the shelba. If something shirk the shelba then it dillydally the shelba. The shelba toggle the gert.", "logic": "\nDillydally(gert, shelba)\nToggle(gert, shelba)\nHerculean(gert)\nRubber(gert)\nAirless(gert)\nHaploidic(gert)\nTahitian(gert)\nShirk(gert, shelba)\nDillydally(shelba, gert)\nToggle(shelba, gert)\nHerculean(shelba)\nRubber(shelba)\nAirless(shelba)\nHaploidic(shelba)\nTahitian(shelba)\nShirk(shelba, gert)\nforall x (Airless(x) -> Toggle(x, shelba))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, shelba) and Herculean(x) -> Airless(x))\nforall x (Tahitian(x) and Dillydally(x, shelba) -> Shirk(x, shelba))\nforall x (Shirk(x, gert) -> Toggle(x, gert))\nforall x (Toggle(x, shelba) and Dillydally(x, gert) -> Shirk(x, shelba))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, gert) and Shirk(x, shelba) -> Airless(shelba))\nforall x (Airless(x) and Dillydally(x, gert) -> Toggle(gert, shelba))\nforall x (Shirk(x, shelba) -> Dillydally(x, shelba))\n\nToggle(shelba, gert)\n\ntherefore Toggle(shelba, gert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The ambros lament the ashlie. The ambros cumulate the ashlie. The ambros is iffy. The ambros is neuromotor. The ambros is maintained. The ambros is exogamous. The ambros is scorbutic. The ambros combat the ashlie. The ashlie lament the ambros. The ashlie cumulate the ambros. The ashlie is iffy. The ashlie is neuromotor. The ashlie is maintained. The ashlie is exogamous. The ashlie is scorbutic. The ashlie combat the ambros. If something is maintained then it cumulate the ashlie. If something lament the ashlie and it is iffy then it is maintained. If something is scorbutic and it lament the ashlie then it combat the ashlie. If something combat the ambros then it cumulate the ambros. If something cumulate the ashlie and it lament the ambros then it combat the ashlie. If something lament the ambros and it combat the ashlie then the ashlie is maintained. If something is maintained and it lament the ambros then the ambros cumulate the ashlie. If something combat the ashlie then it lament the ashlie. The ashlie is not scorbutic.", "logic": "\nLament(ambros, ashlie)\nCumulate(ambros, ashlie)\nIffy(ambros)\nNeuromotor(ambros)\nMaintained(ambros)\nExogamous(ambros)\nScorbutic(ambros)\nCombat(ambros, ashlie)\nLament(ashlie, ambros)\nCumulate(ashlie, ambros)\nIffy(ashlie)\nNeuromotor(ashlie)\nMaintained(ashlie)\nExogamous(ashlie)\nScorbutic(ashlie)\nCombat(ashlie, ambros)\nforall x (Maintained(x) -> Cumulate(x, ashlie))\nforall x (Lament(x, ashlie) and Iffy(x) -> Maintained(x))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) and Lament(x, ashlie) -> Combat(x, ashlie))\nforall x (Combat(x, ambros) -> Cumulate(x, ambros))\nforall x (Cumulate(x, ashlie) and Lament(x, ambros) -> Combat(x, ashlie))\nforall x (Lament(x, ambros) and Combat(x, ashlie) -> Maintained(ashlie))\nforall x (Maintained(x) and Lament(x, ambros) -> Cumulate(ambros, ashlie))\nforall x (Combat(x, ashlie) -> Lament(x, ashlie))\n\nnot Scorbutic(ashlie)\n\ntherefore Scorbutic(ashlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The yancy debrief the gladi. The yancy unstring the gladi. The yancy is protruding. The yancy is orbiculate. The yancy is correlate. The yancy is unvented. The yancy is enteric. The yancy handbuild the gladi. The gladi debrief the yancy. The gladi unstring the yancy. The gladi is protruding. The gladi is orbiculate. The gladi is correlate. The gladi is unvented. The gladi is enteric. The gladi handbuild the yancy. If something is correlate then it unstring the gladi. If something debrief the gladi and it is protruding then it is correlate. If something is enteric and it debrief the gladi then it handbuild the gladi. If something handbuild the yancy then it unstring the yancy. If something unstring the gladi and it debrief the yancy then it handbuild the gladi. If something debrief the yancy and it handbuild the gladi then the gladi is correlate. If something is correlate and it debrief the yancy then the yancy unstring the gladi. If something handbuild the gladi then it debrief the gladi. The gladi unstring the gladi.", "logic": "\nDebrief(yancy, gladi)\nUnstring(yancy, gladi)\nProtruding(yancy)\nOrbiculate(yancy)\nCorrelate(yancy)\nUnvented(yancy)\nEnteric(yancy)\nHandbuild(yancy, gladi)\nDebrief(gladi, yancy)\nUnstring(gladi, yancy)\nProtruding(gladi)\nOrbiculate(gladi)\nCorrelate(gladi)\nUnvented(gladi)\nEnteric(gladi)\nHandbuild(gladi, yancy)\nforall x (Correlate(x) -> Unstring(x, gladi))\nforall x (Debrief(x, gladi) and Protruding(x) -> Correlate(x))\nforall x (Enteric(x) and Debrief(x, gladi) -> Handbuild(x, gladi))\nforall x (Handbuild(x, yancy) -> Unstring(x, yancy))\nforall x (Unstring(x, gladi) and Debrief(x, yancy) -> Handbuild(x, gladi))\nforall x (Debrief(x, yancy) and Handbuild(x, gladi) -> Correlate(gladi))\nforall x (Correlate(x) and Debrief(x, yancy) -> Unstring(yancy, gladi))\nforall x (Handbuild(x, gladi) -> Debrief(x, gladi))\n\nUnstring(gladi, gladi)\n\nCorrelate(gladi) and forall x (Correlate(x) -> Unstring(x, gladi)) -> therefore Unstring(gladi, gladi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The lisbeth refurnish the dasha. The lisbeth denigrate the dasha. The lisbeth is defensive. The lisbeth is spousal. The lisbeth is alienating. The lisbeth is wretched. The lisbeth is ornamental. The lisbeth compere the dasha. The dasha refurnish the lisbeth. The dasha denigrate the lisbeth. The dasha is defensive. The dasha is spousal. The dasha is alienating. The dasha is wretched. The dasha is ornamental. The dasha compere the lisbeth. If something is alienating then it denigrate the dasha. If something refurnish the dasha and it is defensive then it is alienating. If something is ornamental and it refurnish the dasha then it compere the dasha. If something compere the lisbeth then it denigrate the lisbeth. If something denigrate the dasha and it refurnish the lisbeth then it compere the dasha. If something refurnish the lisbeth and it compere the dasha then the dasha is alienating. If something is alienating and it refurnish the lisbeth then the lisbeth denigrate the dasha. If something compere the dasha then it refurnish the dasha. The dasha does not eat the dasha.", "logic": "\nRefurnish(lisbeth, dasha)\nDenigrate(lisbeth, dasha)\nDefensive(lisbeth)\nSpousal(lisbeth)\nAlienating(lisbeth)\nWretched(lisbeth)\nOrnamental(lisbeth)\nCompere(lisbeth, dasha)\nRefurnish(dasha, lisbeth)\nDenigrate(dasha, lisbeth)\nDefensive(dasha)\nSpousal(dasha)\nAlienating(dasha)\nWretched(dasha)\nOrnamental(dasha)\nCompere(dasha, lisbeth)\nforall x (Alienating(x) -> Denigrate(x, dasha))\nforall x (Refurnish(x, dasha) and Defensive(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Ornamental(x) and Refurnish(x, dasha) -> Compere(x, dasha))\nforall x (Compere(x, lisbeth) -> Denigrate(x, lisbeth))\nforall x (Denigrate(x, dasha) and Refurnish(x, lisbeth) -> Compere(x, dasha))\nforall x (Refurnish(x, lisbeth) and Compere(x, dasha) -> Alienating(dasha))\nforall x (Alienating(x) and Refurnish(x, lisbeth) -> Denigrate(lisbeth, dasha))\nforall x (Compere(x, dasha) -> Refurnish(x, dasha))\n\nnot Denigrate(dasha, dasha)\n\nAlienating(dasha) and forall x (Alienating(x) -> Denigrate(x, dasha)) -> therefore Denigrate(dasha, dasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The dom proportion the clareta. The dom pray the clareta. The dom is corking. The dom is deathless. The dom is abulic. The dom is overnice. The dom is unmingled. The dom melodise the clareta. The clareta proportion the dom. The clareta pray the dom. The clareta is corking. The clareta is deathless. The clareta is abulic. The clareta is overnice. The clareta is unmingled. The clareta melodise the dom. If something is abulic then it pray the clareta. If something proportion the clareta and it is corking then it is abulic. If something is unmingled and it proportion the clareta then it melodise the clareta. If something melodise the dom then it pray the dom. If something pray the clareta and it proportion the dom then it melodise the clareta. If something proportion the dom and it melodise the clareta then the clareta is abulic. If something is abulic and it proportion the dom then the dom pray the clareta. If something melodise the clareta then it proportion the clareta. The clareta melodise the clareta.", "logic": "\nProportion(dom, clareta)\nPray(dom, clareta)\nCorking(dom)\nDeathless(dom)\nAbulic(dom)\nOvernice(dom)\nUnmingled(dom)\nMelodise(dom, clareta)\nProportion(clareta, dom)\nPray(clareta, dom)\nCorking(clareta)\nDeathless(clareta)\nAbulic(clareta)\nOvernice(clareta)\nUnmingled(clareta)\nMelodise(clareta, dom)\nforall x (Abulic(x) -> Pray(x, clareta))\nforall x (Proportion(x, clareta) and Corking(x) -> Abulic(x))\nforall x (Unmingled(x) and Proportion(x, clareta) -> Melodise(x, clareta))\nforall x (Melodise(x, dom) -> Pray(x, dom))\nforall x (Pray(x, clareta) and Proportion(x, dom) -> Melodise(x, clareta))\nforall x (Proportion(x, dom) and Melodise(x, clareta) -> Abulic(clareta))\nforall x (Abulic(x) and Proportion(x, dom) -> Pray(dom, clareta))\nforall x (Melodise(x, clareta) -> Proportion(x, clareta))\n\nMelodise(clareta, clareta)\n\nAbulic(clareta) and forall x (Abulic(x) -> Pray(x, clareta)) -> therefore Pray(clareta, clareta) Pray(clareta, clareta) and Proportion(clareta, dom) and forall x (Pray(x, clareta) and Proportion(x, dom) -> Melodise(x, clareta)) -> therefore Melodise(clareta, clareta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The anallese retrospect the sissie. The anallese ferment the sissie. The anallese is inbuilt. The anallese is theoretic. The anallese is lancinate. The anallese is jade. The anallese is backstage. The anallese envision the sissie. The sissie retrospect the anallese. The sissie ferment the anallese. The sissie is inbuilt. The sissie is theoretic. The sissie is lancinate. The sissie is jade. The sissie is backstage. The sissie envision the anallese. If something is lancinate then it ferment the sissie. If something retrospect the sissie and it is inbuilt then it is lancinate. If something is backstage and it retrospect the sissie then it envision the sissie. If something envision the anallese then it ferment the anallese. If something ferment the sissie and it retrospect the anallese then it envision the sissie. If something retrospect the anallese and it envision the sissie then the sissie is lancinate. If something is lancinate and it retrospect the anallese then the anallese ferment the sissie. If something envision the sissie then it retrospect the sissie. The sissie does not see the sissie.", "logic": "\nRetrospect(anallese, sissie)\nFerment(anallese, sissie)\nInbuilt(anallese)\nTheoretic(anallese)\nLancinate(anallese)\nJade(anallese)\nBackstage(anallese)\nEnvision(anallese, sissie)\nRetrospect(sissie, anallese)\nFerment(sissie, anallese)\nInbuilt(sissie)\nTheoretic(sissie)\nLancinate(sissie)\nJade(sissie)\nBackstage(sissie)\nEnvision(sissie, anallese)\nforall x (Lancinate(x) -> Ferment(x, sissie))\nforall x (Retrospect(x, sissie) and Inbuilt(x) -> Lancinate(x))\nforall x (Backstage(x) and Retrospect(x, sissie) -> Envision(x, sissie))\nforall x (Envision(x, anallese) -> Ferment(x, anallese))\nforall x (Ferment(x, sissie) and Retrospect(x, anallese) -> Envision(x, sissie))\nforall x (Retrospect(x, anallese) and Envision(x, sissie) -> Lancinate(sissie))\nforall x (Lancinate(x) and Retrospect(x, anallese) -> Ferment(anallese, sissie))\nforall x (Envision(x, sissie) -> Retrospect(x, sissie))\n\nnot Envision(sissie, sissie)\n\nLancinate(sissie) and forall x (Lancinate(x) -> Ferment(x, sissie)) -> therefore Ferment(sissie, sissie) Ferment(sissie, sissie) and Retrospect(sissie, anallese) and forall x (Ferment(x, sissie) and Retrospect(x, anallese) -> Envision(x, sissie)) -> therefore Envision(sissie, sissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The ailina cash the tamarah. The ailina shimmer the tamarah. The ailina is unclad. The ailina is american. The ailina is immoderate. The ailina is definite. The ailina is sissy. The ailina differ the tamarah. The tamarah cash the ailina. The tamarah shimmer the ailina. The tamarah is unclad. The tamarah is american. The tamarah is immoderate. The tamarah is definite. The tamarah is sissy. The tamarah differ the ailina. If something is immoderate then it shimmer the tamarah. If something cash the tamarah and it is unclad then it is immoderate. If something is sissy and it cash the tamarah then it differ the tamarah. If something differ the ailina then it shimmer the ailina. If something shimmer the tamarah and it cash the ailina then it differ the tamarah. If something cash the ailina and it differ the tamarah then the tamarah is immoderate. If something is immoderate and it cash the ailina then the ailina shimmer the tamarah. If something differ the tamarah then it cash the tamarah. The tamarah cash the tamarah.", "logic": "\nCash(ailina, tamarah)\nShimmer(ailina, tamarah)\nUnclad(ailina)\nAmerican(ailina)\nImmoderate(ailina)\nDefinite(ailina)\nSissy(ailina)\nDiffer(ailina, tamarah)\nCash(tamarah, ailina)\nShimmer(tamarah, ailina)\nUnclad(tamarah)\nAmerican(tamarah)\nImmoderate(tamarah)\nDefinite(tamarah)\nSissy(tamarah)\nDiffer(tamarah, ailina)\nforall x (Immoderate(x) -> Shimmer(x, tamarah))\nforall x (Cash(x, tamarah) and Unclad(x) -> Immoderate(x))\nforall x (Sissy(x) and Cash(x, tamarah) -> Differ(x, tamarah))\nforall x (Differ(x, ailina) -> Shimmer(x, ailina))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, tamarah) and Cash(x, ailina) -> Differ(x, tamarah))\nforall x (Cash(x, ailina) and Differ(x, tamarah) -> Immoderate(tamarah))\nforall x (Immoderate(x) and Cash(x, ailina) -> Shimmer(ailina, tamarah))\nforall x (Differ(x, tamarah) -> Cash(x, tamarah))\n\nCash(tamarah, tamarah)\n\nImmoderate(tamarah) and forall x (Immoderate(x) -> Shimmer(x, tamarah)) -> therefore Shimmer(tamarah, tamarah) Shimmer(tamarah, tamarah) and Cash(tamarah, ailina) and forall x (Shimmer(x, tamarah) and Cash(x, ailina) -> Differ(x, tamarah)) -> therefore Differ(tamarah, tamarah) Differ(tamarah, tamarah) and forall x (Differ(x, tamarah) -> Cash(x, tamarah)) -> therefore Cash(tamarah, tamarah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The jenine determine the jacklin. The jenine introvert the jacklin. The jenine is corrigible. The jenine is monotypic. The jenine is recorded. The jenine is scentless. The jenine is subject. The jenine brighten the jacklin. The jacklin determine the jenine. The jacklin introvert the jenine. The jacklin is corrigible. The jacklin is monotypic. The jacklin is recorded. The jacklin is scentless. The jacklin is subject. The jacklin brighten the jenine. If something is recorded then it introvert the jacklin. If something determine the jacklin and it is corrigible then it is recorded. If something is subject and it determine the jacklin then it brighten the jacklin. If something brighten the jenine then it introvert the jenine. If something introvert the jacklin and it determine the jenine then it brighten the jacklin. If something determine the jenine and it brighten the jacklin then the jacklin is recorded. If something is recorded and it determine the jenine then the jenine introvert the jacklin. If something brighten the jacklin then it determine the jacklin. The jacklin does not chase the jacklin.", "logic": "\nDetermine(jenine, jacklin)\nIntrovert(jenine, jacklin)\nCorrigible(jenine)\nMonotypic(jenine)\nRecorded(jenine)\nScentless(jenine)\nSubject(jenine)\nBrighten(jenine, jacklin)\nDetermine(jacklin, jenine)\nIntrovert(jacklin, jenine)\nCorrigible(jacklin)\nMonotypic(jacklin)\nRecorded(jacklin)\nScentless(jacklin)\nSubject(jacklin)\nBrighten(jacklin, jenine)\nforall x (Recorded(x) -> Introvert(x, jacklin))\nforall x (Determine(x, jacklin) and Corrigible(x) -> Recorded(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) and Determine(x, jacklin) -> Brighten(x, jacklin))\nforall x (Brighten(x, jenine) -> Introvert(x, jenine))\nforall x (Introvert(x, jacklin) and Determine(x, jenine) -> Brighten(x, jacklin))\nforall x (Determine(x, jenine) and Brighten(x, jacklin) -> Recorded(jacklin))\nforall x (Recorded(x) and Determine(x, jenine) -> Introvert(jenine, jacklin))\nforall x (Brighten(x, jacklin) -> Determine(x, jacklin))\n\nnot Determine(jacklin, jacklin)\n\nRecorded(jacklin) and forall x (Recorded(x) -> Introvert(x, jacklin)) -> therefore Introvert(jacklin, jacklin) Introvert(jacklin, jacklin) and Determine(jacklin, jenine) and forall x (Introvert(x, jacklin) and Determine(x, jenine) -> Brighten(x, jacklin)) -> therefore Brighten(jacklin, jacklin) Brighten(jacklin, jacklin) and forall x (Brighten(x, jacklin) -> Determine(x, jacklin)) -> therefore Determine(jacklin, jacklin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The jefry induce the melitta. The jefry razz the melitta. The jefry is diarrhoeal. The jefry is mellow. The jefry is expiratory. The jefry is nonlexical. The jefry is panoramic. The jefry ravage the melitta. The melitta induce the jefry. The melitta razz the jefry. The melitta is diarrhoeal. The melitta is mellow. The melitta is expiratory. The melitta is nonlexical. The melitta is panoramic. The melitta ravage the jefry. If something is expiratory then it razz the melitta. If something induce the melitta and it is diarrhoeal then it is expiratory. If something is panoramic and it induce the melitta then it ravage the melitta. If something ravage the jefry then it razz the jefry. If something razz the melitta and it induce the jefry then it ravage the melitta. If something induce the jefry and it ravage the melitta then the melitta is expiratory. If something is expiratory and it induce the jefry then the jefry razz the melitta. If something ravage the melitta then it induce the melitta. The jefry does not eat the jefry.", "logic": "\nInduce(jefry, melitta)\nRazz(jefry, melitta)\nDiarrhoeal(jefry)\nMellow(jefry)\nExpiratory(jefry)\nNonlexical(jefry)\nPanoramic(jefry)\nRavage(jefry, melitta)\nInduce(melitta, jefry)\nRazz(melitta, jefry)\nDiarrhoeal(melitta)\nMellow(melitta)\nExpiratory(melitta)\nNonlexical(melitta)\nPanoramic(melitta)\nRavage(melitta, jefry)\nforall x (Expiratory(x) -> Razz(x, melitta))\nforall x (Induce(x, melitta) and Diarrhoeal(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nforall x (Panoramic(x) and Induce(x, melitta) -> Ravage(x, melitta))\nforall x (Ravage(x, jefry) -> Razz(x, jefry))\nforall x (Razz(x, melitta) and Induce(x, jefry) -> Ravage(x, melitta))\nforall x (Induce(x, jefry) and Ravage(x, melitta) -> Expiratory(melitta))\nforall x (Expiratory(x) and Induce(x, jefry) -> Razz(jefry, melitta))\nforall x (Ravage(x, melitta) -> Induce(x, melitta))\n\nnot Razz(jefry, jefry)\n\nforall x (Ravage(x, jefry) -> Razz(x, jefry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The dorthy detusk the elaina. The dorthy hypnotize the elaina. The dorthy is usable. The dorthy is amerindic. The dorthy is average. The dorthy is sobering. The dorthy is rank. The dorthy kvetch the elaina. The elaina detusk the dorthy. The elaina hypnotize the dorthy. The elaina is usable. The elaina is amerindic. The elaina is average. The elaina is sobering. The elaina is rank. The elaina kvetch the dorthy. If something is average then it hypnotize the elaina. If something detusk the elaina and it is usable then it is average. If something is rank and it detusk the elaina then it kvetch the elaina. If something kvetch the dorthy then it hypnotize the dorthy. If something hypnotize the elaina and it detusk the dorthy then it kvetch the elaina. If something detusk the dorthy and it kvetch the elaina then the elaina is average. If something is average and it detusk the dorthy then the dorthy hypnotize the elaina. If something kvetch the elaina then it detusk the elaina. The dorthy kvetch the dorthy.", "logic": "\nDetusk(dorthy, elaina)\nHypnotize(dorthy, elaina)\nUsable(dorthy)\nAmerindic(dorthy)\nAverage(dorthy)\nSobering(dorthy)\nRank(dorthy)\nKvetch(dorthy, elaina)\nDetusk(elaina, dorthy)\nHypnotize(elaina, dorthy)\nUsable(elaina)\nAmerindic(elaina)\nAverage(elaina)\nSobering(elaina)\nRank(elaina)\nKvetch(elaina, dorthy)\nforall x (Average(x) -> Hypnotize(x, elaina))\nforall x (Detusk(x, elaina) and Usable(x) -> Average(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) and Detusk(x, elaina) -> Kvetch(x, elaina))\nforall x (Kvetch(x, dorthy) -> Hypnotize(x, dorthy))\nforall x (Hypnotize(x, elaina) and Detusk(x, dorthy) -> Kvetch(x, elaina))\nforall x (Detusk(x, dorthy) and Kvetch(x, elaina) -> Average(elaina))\nforall x (Average(x) and Detusk(x, dorthy) -> Hypnotize(dorthy, elaina))\nforall x (Kvetch(x, elaina) -> Detusk(x, elaina))\n\nKvetch(dorthy, dorthy)\n\nKvetch(dorthy, dorthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "Wells is not propitious. Wells is perineal. Wells is depilous. Ambros is propitious. Ambros is diarrheic. Ambros is perineal. Caroline is not propitious. Caroline is whispering. Caroline is depilous. Caroline is not cormous. Smart, cormous people are insane. White, insane people are not depilous. If Caroline is propitious then Caroline is cormous. All propitious people are cormous. If Wells is insane and Wells is not propitious then Wells is not whispering. If Wells is depilous and Wells is diarrheic then Wells is cormous. Ambros is diarrheic.", "logic": "\nnot Propitious(wells)\nPerineal(wells)\nDepilous(wells)\nPropitious(ambros)\nDiarrheic(ambros)\nPerineal(ambros)\nnot Propitious(caroline)\nWhispering(caroline)\nDepilous(caroline)\nnot Cormous(caroline)\nforall x (Depilous(x) and Cormous(x) -> Insane(x))\nforall x (Cormous(x) and Insane(x) -> not Depilous(x))\nPropitious(caroline) -> Cormous(caroline)\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Cormous(x))\nInsane(wells) and not Propitious(wells) -> not Whispering(wells)\nDepilous(wells) and Diarrheic(wells) -> Cormous(wells)\n\nDiarrheic(ambros)\n\ntherefore Diarrheic(ambros)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "Kate is not bountied. Kate is trihydroxy. Kate is trinuclear. Niven is bountied. Niven is expansile. Niven is trihydroxy. Ossie is not bountied. Ossie is radical. Ossie is trinuclear. Ossie is not ersatz. Smart, ersatz people are monodic. White, monodic people are not trinuclear. If Ossie is bountied then Ossie is ersatz. All bountied people are ersatz. If Kate is monodic and Kate is not bountied then Kate is not radical. If Kate is trinuclear and Kate is expansile then Kate is ersatz. Ossie is bountied.", "logic": "\nnot Bountied(kate)\nTrihydroxy(kate)\nTrinuclear(kate)\nBountied(niven)\nExpansile(niven)\nTrihydroxy(niven)\nnot Bountied(ossie)\nRadical(ossie)\nTrinuclear(ossie)\nnot Ersatz(ossie)\nforall x (Trinuclear(x) and Ersatz(x) -> Monodic(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) and Monodic(x) -> not Trinuclear(x))\nBountied(ossie) -> Ersatz(ossie)\nforall x (Bountied(x) -> Ersatz(x))\nMonodic(kate) and not Bountied(kate) -> not Radical(kate)\nTrinuclear(kate) and Expansile(kate) -> Ersatz(kate)\n\nBountied(ossie)\n\ntherefore not Bountied(ossie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "Marlee is not texan. Marlee is fungal. Marlee is ascribable. Simonne is texan. Simonne is bigoted. Simonne is fungal. Allie is not texan. Allie is emeritus. Allie is ascribable. Allie is not pyretic. Smart, pyretic people are backmost. White, backmost people are not ascribable. If Allie is texan then Allie is pyretic. All texan people are pyretic. If Marlee is backmost and Marlee is not texan then Marlee is not emeritus. If Marlee is ascribable and Marlee is bigoted then Marlee is pyretic. Simonne is pyretic.", "logic": "\nnot Texan(marlee)\nFungal(marlee)\nAscribable(marlee)\nTexan(simonne)\nBigoted(simonne)\nFungal(simonne)\nnot Texan(allie)\nEmeritus(allie)\nAscribable(allie)\nnot Pyretic(allie)\nforall x (Ascribable(x) and Pyretic(x) -> Backmost(x))\nforall x (Pyretic(x) and Backmost(x) -> not Ascribable(x))\nTexan(allie) -> Pyretic(allie)\nforall x (Texan(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nBackmost(marlee) and not Texan(marlee) -> not Emeritus(marlee)\nAscribable(marlee) and Bigoted(marlee) -> Pyretic(marlee)\n\nPyretic(simonne)\n\nTexan(simonne) and forall x (Texan(x) -> Pyretic(x)) -> therefore Pyretic(simonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "Reggie is not guarded. Reggie is armoured. Reggie is unframed. Arleta is guarded. Arleta is outboard. Arleta is armoured. Redmond is not guarded. Redmond is flawless. Redmond is unframed. Redmond is not octangular. Smart, octangular people are unrigged. White, unrigged people are not unframed. If Redmond is guarded then Redmond is octangular. All guarded people are octangular. If Reggie is unrigged and Reggie is not guarded then Reggie is not flawless. If Reggie is unframed and Reggie is outboard then Reggie is octangular. Arleta is not octangular.", "logic": "\nnot Guarded(reggie)\nArmoured(reggie)\nUnframed(reggie)\nGuarded(arleta)\nOutboard(arleta)\nArmoured(arleta)\nnot Guarded(redmond)\nFlawless(redmond)\nUnframed(redmond)\nnot Octangular(redmond)\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Octangular(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Octangular(x) and Unrigged(x) -> not Unframed(x))\nGuarded(redmond) -> Octangular(redmond)\nforall x (Guarded(x) -> Octangular(x))\nUnrigged(reggie) and not Guarded(reggie) -> not Flawless(reggie)\nUnframed(reggie) and Outboard(reggie) -> Octangular(reggie)\n\nnot Octangular(arleta)\n\nGuarded(arleta) and forall x (Guarded(x) -> Octangular(x)) -> therefore Octangular(arleta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "Jorie is not mutinous. Jorie is doltish. Jorie is osseous. Vanna is mutinous. Vanna is cringing. Vanna is doltish. Vivian is not mutinous. Vivian is lacklustre. Vivian is osseous. Vivian is not arresting. Smart, arresting people are bovine. White, bovine people are not osseous. If Vivian is mutinous then Vivian is arresting. All mutinous people are arresting. If Jorie is bovine and Jorie is not mutinous then Jorie is not lacklustre. If Jorie is osseous and Jorie is cringing then Jorie is arresting. Jorie is not bovine.", "logic": "\nnot Mutinous(jorie)\nDoltish(jorie)\nOsseous(jorie)\nMutinous(vanna)\nCringing(vanna)\nDoltish(vanna)\nnot Mutinous(vivian)\nLacklustre(vivian)\nOsseous(vivian)\nnot Arresting(vivian)\nforall x (Osseous(x) and Arresting(x) -> Bovine(x))\nforall x (Arresting(x) and Bovine(x) -> not Osseous(x))\nMutinous(vivian) -> Arresting(vivian)\nforall x (Mutinous(x) -> Arresting(x))\nBovine(jorie) and not Mutinous(jorie) -> not Lacklustre(jorie)\nOsseous(jorie) and Cringing(jorie) -> Arresting(jorie)\n\nnot Bovine(jorie)\n\nforall x (Osseous(x) and Arresting(x) -> Bovine(x)) <- forall x (Mutinous(x) -> Arresting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "Randolf is not manifest. Randolf is former. Randolf is furled. Cate is manifest. Cate is spiteful. Cate is former. Briney is not manifest. Briney is bacchic. Briney is furled. Briney is not frizzly. Smart, frizzly people are recluse. White, recluse people are not furled. If Briney is manifest then Briney is frizzly. All manifest people are frizzly. If Randolf is recluse and Randolf is not manifest then Randolf is not bacchic. If Randolf is furled and Randolf is spiteful then Randolf is frizzly. Cate is recluse.", "logic": "\nnot Manifest(randolf)\nFormer(randolf)\nFurled(randolf)\nManifest(cate)\nSpiteful(cate)\nFormer(cate)\nnot Manifest(briney)\nBacchic(briney)\nFurled(briney)\nnot Frizzly(briney)\nforall x (Furled(x) and Frizzly(x) -> Recluse(x))\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and Recluse(x) -> not Furled(x))\nManifest(briney) -> Frizzly(briney)\nforall x (Manifest(x) -> Frizzly(x))\nRecluse(randolf) and not Manifest(randolf) -> not Bacchic(randolf)\nFurled(randolf) and Spiteful(randolf) -> Frizzly(randolf)\n\nRecluse(cate)\n\nforall x (Furled(x) and Frizzly(x) -> Recluse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "Kraig is not gritty. Kraig is swish. Kraig is corded. Percy is gritty. Percy is scrappy. Percy is swish. Ike is not gritty. Ike is noduled. Ike is corded. Ike is not loose. Smart, loose people are undersea. White, undersea people are not corded. If Ike is gritty then Ike is loose. All gritty people are loose. If Kraig is undersea and Kraig is not gritty then Kraig is not noduled. If Kraig is corded and Kraig is scrappy then Kraig is loose. Ike is not swish.", "logic": "\nnot Gritty(kraig)\nSwish(kraig)\nCorded(kraig)\nGritty(percy)\nScrappy(percy)\nSwish(percy)\nnot Gritty(ike)\nNoduled(ike)\nCorded(ike)\nnot Loose(ike)\nforall x (Corded(x) and Loose(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Loose(x) and Undersea(x) -> not Corded(x))\nGritty(ike) -> Loose(ike)\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Loose(x))\nUndersea(kraig) and not Gritty(kraig) -> not Noduled(kraig)\nCorded(kraig) and Scrappy(kraig) -> Loose(kraig)\n\nnot Swish(ike)\n\nnot Swish(ike) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "Keriann is not loud. Keriann is antiblack. Keriann is everyday. Reed is loud. Reed is iridescent. Reed is antiblack. Joyan is not loud. Joyan is vulgar. Joyan is everyday. Joyan is not halal. Smart, halal people are operculate. White, operculate people are not everyday. If Joyan is loud then Joyan is halal. All loud people are halal. If Keriann is operculate and Keriann is not loud then Keriann is not vulgar. If Keriann is everyday and Keriann is iridescent then Keriann is halal. Keriann is iridescent.", "logic": "\nnot Loud(keriann)\nAntiblack(keriann)\nEveryday(keriann)\nLoud(reed)\nIridescent(reed)\nAntiblack(reed)\nnot Loud(joyan)\nVulgar(joyan)\nEveryday(joyan)\nnot Halal(joyan)\nforall x (Everyday(x) and Halal(x) -> Operculate(x))\nforall x (Halal(x) and Operculate(x) -> not Everyday(x))\nLoud(joyan) -> Halal(joyan)\nforall x (Loud(x) -> Halal(x))\nOperculate(keriann) and not Loud(keriann) -> not Vulgar(keriann)\nEveryday(keriann) and Iridescent(keriann) -> Halal(keriann)\n\nIridescent(keriann)\n\nIridescent(keriann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1513"} {"premises": "The adelle is burned. The adelle affiance the elysha. The adelle memorize the elysha. The adelle fete the elysha. The adelle fete the jens. The elysha is burned. The elysha is monochrome. The elysha affiance the jens. The elysha memorize the jens. The jens does not see the elysha. If someone memorize the jens then they are monochrome. If someone fete the adelle and the adelle memorize the jens then the jens affiance the elysha. If someone affiance the elysha and they need the adelle then the adelle is frothy. If someone is monochrome and they see the adelle then the adelle memorize the jens. If someone memorize the elysha then the elysha affiance the adelle. If someone is frothy then they see the jens. If someone is burned then they need the adelle. If someone affiance the elysha and the elysha affiance the jens then the elysha fete the adelle. The jens does not see the elysha.", "logic": "\nBurned(adelle)\nAffiance(adelle, elysha)\nMemorize(adelle, elysha)\nFete(adelle, elysha)\nFete(adelle, jens)\nBurned(elysha)\nMonochrome(elysha)\nAffiance(elysha, jens)\nMemorize(elysha, jens)\nnot Memorize(jens, elysha)\nforall x (Memorize(x, jens) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Fete(x, adelle) and Memorize(adelle, jens) -> Affiance(jens, elysha))\nforall x (Affiance(x, elysha) and Affiance(x, adelle) -> Frothy(adelle))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) and Memorize(x, adelle) -> Memorize(adelle, jens))\nforall x (Memorize(x, elysha) -> Affiance(elysha, adelle))\nforall x (Frothy(x) -> Memorize(x, jens))\nforall x (Burned(x) -> Affiance(x, adelle))\nforall x (Affiance(x, elysha) and Affiance(elysha, jens) -> Fete(elysha, adelle))\n\nnot Memorize(jens, elysha)\n\ntherefore not Memorize(jens, elysha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The fanni is jesuitical. The fanni prevent the rudd. The fanni sportscast the rudd. The fanni despise the rudd. The fanni despise the tomi. The rudd is jesuitical. The rudd is oceangoing. The rudd prevent the tomi. The rudd sportscast the tomi. The tomi does not see the rudd. If someone sportscast the tomi then they are oceangoing. If someone despise the fanni and the fanni sportscast the tomi then the tomi prevent the rudd. If someone prevent the rudd and they need the fanni then the fanni is graduate. If someone is oceangoing and they see the fanni then the fanni sportscast the tomi. If someone sportscast the rudd then the rudd prevent the fanni. If someone is graduate then they see the tomi. If someone is jesuitical then they need the fanni. If someone prevent the rudd and the rudd prevent the tomi then the rudd despise the fanni. The fanni does not need the rudd.", "logic": "\nJesuitical(fanni)\nPrevent(fanni, rudd)\nSportscast(fanni, rudd)\nDespise(fanni, rudd)\nDespise(fanni, tomi)\nJesuitical(rudd)\nOceangoing(rudd)\nPrevent(rudd, tomi)\nSportscast(rudd, tomi)\nnot Sportscast(tomi, rudd)\nforall x (Sportscast(x, tomi) -> Oceangoing(x))\nforall x (Despise(x, fanni) and Sportscast(fanni, tomi) -> Prevent(tomi, rudd))\nforall x (Prevent(x, rudd) and Prevent(x, fanni) -> Graduate(fanni))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) and Sportscast(x, fanni) -> Sportscast(fanni, tomi))\nforall x (Sportscast(x, rudd) -> Prevent(rudd, fanni))\nforall x (Graduate(x) -> Sportscast(x, tomi))\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Prevent(x, fanni))\nforall x (Prevent(x, rudd) and Prevent(rudd, tomi) -> Despise(rudd, fanni))\n\nnot Prevent(fanni, rudd)\n\ntherefore Prevent(fanni, rudd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The tessie is surprising. The tessie repeat the koo. The tessie cannulate the koo. The tessie effeminize the koo. The tessie effeminize the lon. The koo is surprising. The koo is chipper. The koo repeat the lon. The koo cannulate the lon. The lon does not see the koo. If someone cannulate the lon then they are chipper. If someone effeminize the tessie and the tessie cannulate the lon then the lon repeat the koo. If someone repeat the koo and they need the tessie then the tessie is thievish. If someone is chipper and they see the tessie then the tessie cannulate the lon. If someone cannulate the koo then the koo repeat the tessie. If someone is thievish then they see the lon. If someone is surprising then they need the tessie. If someone repeat the koo and the koo repeat the lon then the koo effeminize the tessie. The koo effeminize the tessie.", "logic": "\nSurprising(tessie)\nRepeat(tessie, koo)\nCannulate(tessie, koo)\nEffeminize(tessie, koo)\nEffeminize(tessie, lon)\nSurprising(koo)\nChipper(koo)\nRepeat(koo, lon)\nCannulate(koo, lon)\nnot Cannulate(lon, koo)\nforall x (Cannulate(x, lon) -> Chipper(x))\nforall x (Effeminize(x, tessie) and Cannulate(tessie, lon) -> Repeat(lon, koo))\nforall x (Repeat(x, koo) and Repeat(x, tessie) -> Thievish(tessie))\nforall x (Chipper(x) and Cannulate(x, tessie) -> Cannulate(tessie, lon))\nforall x (Cannulate(x, koo) -> Repeat(koo, tessie))\nforall x (Thievish(x) -> Cannulate(x, lon))\nforall x (Surprising(x) -> Repeat(x, tessie))\nforall x (Repeat(x, koo) and Repeat(koo, lon) -> Effeminize(koo, tessie))\n\nEffeminize(koo, tessie)\n\nRepeat(tessie, koo) and Repeat(koo, lon) and forall x (Repeat(x, koo) and Repeat(koo, lon) -> Effeminize(koo, tessie)) -> therefore Effeminize(koo, tessie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The merci is snaky. The merci woosh the waine. The merci sour the waine. The merci garrote the waine. The merci garrote the frederich. The waine is snaky. The waine is seagoing. The waine woosh the frederich. The waine sour the frederich. The frederich does not see the waine. If someone sour the frederich then they are seagoing. If someone garrote the merci and the merci sour the frederich then the frederich woosh the waine. If someone woosh the waine and they need the merci then the merci is drugless. If someone is seagoing and they see the merci then the merci sour the frederich. If someone sour the waine then the waine woosh the merci. If someone is drugless then they see the frederich. If someone is snaky then they need the merci. If someone woosh the waine and the waine woosh the frederich then the waine garrote the merci. The waine does not need the merci.", "logic": "\nSnaky(merci)\nWoosh(merci, waine)\nSour(merci, waine)\nGarrote(merci, waine)\nGarrote(merci, frederich)\nSnaky(waine)\nSeagoing(waine)\nWoosh(waine, frederich)\nSour(waine, frederich)\nnot Sour(frederich, waine)\nforall x (Sour(x, frederich) -> Seagoing(x))\nforall x (Garrote(x, merci) and Sour(merci, frederich) -> Woosh(frederich, waine))\nforall x (Woosh(x, waine) and Woosh(x, merci) -> Drugless(merci))\nforall x (Seagoing(x) and Sour(x, merci) -> Sour(merci, frederich))\nforall x (Sour(x, waine) -> Woosh(waine, merci))\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Sour(x, frederich))\nforall x (Snaky(x) -> Woosh(x, merci))\nforall x (Woosh(x, waine) and Woosh(waine, frederich) -> Garrote(waine, merci))\n\nnot Woosh(waine, merci)\n\nSour(merci, waine) and forall x (Sour(x, waine) -> Woosh(waine, merci)) -> therefore Woosh(waine, merci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The gavrielle is wartlike. The gavrielle cosponsor the cobb. The gavrielle slink the cobb. The gavrielle lean the cobb. The gavrielle lean the antonie. The cobb is wartlike. The cobb is fattened. The cobb cosponsor the antonie. The cobb slink the antonie. The antonie does not see the cobb. If someone slink the antonie then they are fattened. If someone lean the gavrielle and the gavrielle slink the antonie then the antonie cosponsor the cobb. If someone cosponsor the cobb and they need the gavrielle then the gavrielle is total. If someone is fattened and they see the gavrielle then the gavrielle slink the antonie. If someone slink the cobb then the cobb cosponsor the gavrielle. If someone is total then they see the antonie. If someone is wartlike then they need the gavrielle. If someone cosponsor the cobb and the cobb cosponsor the antonie then the cobb lean the gavrielle. The gavrielle is total.", "logic": "\nWartlike(gavrielle)\nCosponsor(gavrielle, cobb)\nSlink(gavrielle, cobb)\nLean(gavrielle, cobb)\nLean(gavrielle, antonie)\nWartlike(cobb)\nFattened(cobb)\nCosponsor(cobb, antonie)\nSlink(cobb, antonie)\nnot Slink(antonie, cobb)\nforall x (Slink(x, antonie) -> Fattened(x))\nforall x (Lean(x, gavrielle) and Slink(gavrielle, antonie) -> Cosponsor(antonie, cobb))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, cobb) and Cosponsor(x, gavrielle) -> Total(gavrielle))\nforall x (Fattened(x) and Slink(x, gavrielle) -> Slink(gavrielle, antonie))\nforall x (Slink(x, cobb) -> Cosponsor(cobb, gavrielle))\nforall x (Total(x) -> Slink(x, antonie))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Cosponsor(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, cobb) and Cosponsor(cobb, antonie) -> Lean(cobb, gavrielle))\n\nTotal(gavrielle)\n\nWartlike(gavrielle) and forall x (Wartlike(x) -> Cosponsor(x, gavrielle)) -> therefore Cosponsor(gavrielle, gavrielle) Cosponsor(gavrielle, cobb) and Cosponsor(gavrielle, gavrielle) and forall x (Cosponsor(x, cobb) and Cosponsor(x, gavrielle) -> Total(gavrielle)) -> therefore Total(gavrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The damien is locomotor. The damien centrifuge the mallissa. The damien subtitle the mallissa. The damien enter the mallissa. The damien enter the lionel. The mallissa is locomotor. The mallissa is unplanted. The mallissa centrifuge the lionel. The mallissa subtitle the lionel. The lionel does not see the mallissa. If someone subtitle the lionel then they are unplanted. If someone enter the damien and the damien subtitle the lionel then the lionel centrifuge the mallissa. If someone centrifuge the mallissa and they need the damien then the damien is graven. If someone is unplanted and they see the damien then the damien subtitle the lionel. If someone subtitle the mallissa then the mallissa centrifuge the damien. If someone is graven then they see the lionel. If someone is locomotor then they need the damien. If someone centrifuge the mallissa and the mallissa centrifuge the lionel then the mallissa enter the damien. The damien is not graven.", "logic": "\nLocomotor(damien)\nCentrifuge(damien, mallissa)\nSubtitle(damien, mallissa)\nEnter(damien, mallissa)\nEnter(damien, lionel)\nLocomotor(mallissa)\nUnplanted(mallissa)\nCentrifuge(mallissa, lionel)\nSubtitle(mallissa, lionel)\nnot Subtitle(lionel, mallissa)\nforall x (Subtitle(x, lionel) -> Unplanted(x))\nforall x (Enter(x, damien) and Subtitle(damien, lionel) -> Centrifuge(lionel, mallissa))\nforall x (Centrifuge(x, mallissa) and Centrifuge(x, damien) -> Graven(damien))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) and Subtitle(x, damien) -> Subtitle(damien, lionel))\nforall x (Subtitle(x, mallissa) -> Centrifuge(mallissa, damien))\nforall x (Graven(x) -> Subtitle(x, lionel))\nforall x (Locomotor(x) -> Centrifuge(x, damien))\nforall x (Centrifuge(x, mallissa) and Centrifuge(mallissa, lionel) -> Enter(mallissa, damien))\n\nnot Graven(damien)\n\nLocomotor(damien) and forall x (Locomotor(x) -> Centrifuge(x, damien)) -> therefore Centrifuge(damien, damien) Centrifuge(damien, mallissa) and Centrifuge(damien, damien) and forall x (Centrifuge(x, mallissa) and Centrifuge(x, damien) -> Graven(damien)) -> therefore Graven(damien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The hew is glazed. The hew enrol the odessa. The hew revisit the odessa. The hew sequester the odessa. The hew sequester the mame. The odessa is glazed. The odessa is conveyable. The odessa enrol the mame. The odessa revisit the mame. The mame does not see the odessa. If someone revisit the mame then they are conveyable. If someone sequester the hew and the hew revisit the mame then the mame enrol the odessa. If someone enrol the odessa and they need the hew then the hew is regenerate. If someone is conveyable and they see the hew then the hew revisit the mame. If someone revisit the odessa then the odessa enrol the hew. If someone is regenerate then they see the mame. If someone is glazed then they need the hew. If someone enrol the odessa and the odessa enrol the mame then the odessa sequester the hew. The hew revisit the mame.", "logic": "\nGlazed(hew)\nEnrol(hew, odessa)\nRevisit(hew, odessa)\nSequester(hew, odessa)\nSequester(hew, mame)\nGlazed(odessa)\nConveyable(odessa)\nEnrol(odessa, mame)\nRevisit(odessa, mame)\nnot Revisit(mame, odessa)\nforall x (Revisit(x, mame) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Sequester(x, hew) and Revisit(hew, mame) -> Enrol(mame, odessa))\nforall x (Enrol(x, odessa) and Enrol(x, hew) -> Regenerate(hew))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) and Revisit(x, hew) -> Revisit(hew, mame))\nforall x (Revisit(x, odessa) -> Enrol(odessa, hew))\nforall x (Regenerate(x) -> Revisit(x, mame))\nforall x (Glazed(x) -> Enrol(x, hew))\nforall x (Enrol(x, odessa) and Enrol(odessa, mame) -> Sequester(odessa, hew))\n\nRevisit(hew, mame)\n\nGlazed(hew) and forall x (Glazed(x) -> Enrol(x, hew)) -> therefore Enrol(hew, hew) Enrol(hew, odessa) and Enrol(hew, hew) and forall x (Enrol(x, odessa) and Enrol(x, hew) -> Regenerate(hew)) -> therefore Regenerate(hew) Regenerate(hew) and forall x (Regenerate(x) -> Revisit(x, mame)) -> therefore Revisit(hew, mame)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The jenine is etiologic. The jenine phone the fabrice. The jenine pummel the fabrice. The jenine break the fabrice. The jenine break the rheta. The fabrice is etiologic. The fabrice is nonsense. The fabrice phone the rheta. The fabrice pummel the rheta. The rheta does not see the fabrice. If someone pummel the rheta then they are nonsense. If someone break the jenine and the jenine pummel the rheta then the rheta phone the fabrice. If someone phone the fabrice and they need the jenine then the jenine is forbearing. If someone is nonsense and they see the jenine then the jenine pummel the rheta. If someone pummel the fabrice then the fabrice phone the jenine. If someone is forbearing then they see the rheta. If someone is etiologic then they need the jenine. If someone phone the fabrice and the fabrice phone the rheta then the fabrice break the jenine. The jenine does not see the rheta.", "logic": "\nEtiologic(jenine)\nPhone(jenine, fabrice)\nPummel(jenine, fabrice)\nBreak(jenine, fabrice)\nBreak(jenine, rheta)\nEtiologic(fabrice)\nNonsense(fabrice)\nPhone(fabrice, rheta)\nPummel(fabrice, rheta)\nnot Pummel(rheta, fabrice)\nforall x (Pummel(x, rheta) -> Nonsense(x))\nforall x (Break(x, jenine) and Pummel(jenine, rheta) -> Phone(rheta, fabrice))\nforall x (Phone(x, fabrice) and Phone(x, jenine) -> Forbearing(jenine))\nforall x (Nonsense(x) and Pummel(x, jenine) -> Pummel(jenine, rheta))\nforall x (Pummel(x, fabrice) -> Phone(fabrice, jenine))\nforall x (Forbearing(x) -> Pummel(x, rheta))\nforall x (Etiologic(x) -> Phone(x, jenine))\nforall x (Phone(x, fabrice) and Phone(fabrice, rheta) -> Break(fabrice, jenine))\n\nnot Pummel(jenine, rheta)\n\nEtiologic(jenine) and forall x (Etiologic(x) -> Phone(x, jenine)) -> therefore Phone(jenine, jenine) Phone(jenine, fabrice) and Phone(jenine, jenine) and forall x (Phone(x, fabrice) and Phone(x, jenine) -> Forbearing(jenine)) -> therefore Forbearing(jenine) Forbearing(jenine) and forall x (Forbearing(x) -> Pummel(x, rheta)) -> therefore Pummel(jenine, rheta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The vilhelm is treeless. The vilhelm apprise the anabella. The vilhelm ebonize the anabella. The vilhelm afford the anabella. The vilhelm afford the cammie. The anabella is treeless. The anabella is romansh. The anabella apprise the cammie. The anabella ebonize the cammie. The cammie does not see the anabella. If someone ebonize the cammie then they are romansh. If someone afford the vilhelm and the vilhelm ebonize the cammie then the cammie apprise the anabella. If someone apprise the anabella and they need the vilhelm then the vilhelm is untalented. If someone is romansh and they see the vilhelm then the vilhelm ebonize the cammie. If someone ebonize the anabella then the anabella apprise the vilhelm. If someone is untalented then they see the cammie. If someone is treeless then they need the vilhelm. If someone apprise the anabella and the anabella apprise the cammie then the anabella afford the vilhelm. The cammie does not need the vilhelm.", "logic": "\nTreeless(vilhelm)\nApprise(vilhelm, anabella)\nEbonize(vilhelm, anabella)\nAfford(vilhelm, anabella)\nAfford(vilhelm, cammie)\nTreeless(anabella)\nRomansh(anabella)\nApprise(anabella, cammie)\nEbonize(anabella, cammie)\nnot Ebonize(cammie, anabella)\nforall x (Ebonize(x, cammie) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Afford(x, vilhelm) and Ebonize(vilhelm, cammie) -> Apprise(cammie, anabella))\nforall x (Apprise(x, anabella) and Apprise(x, vilhelm) -> Untalented(vilhelm))\nforall x (Romansh(x) and Ebonize(x, vilhelm) -> Ebonize(vilhelm, cammie))\nforall x (Ebonize(x, anabella) -> Apprise(anabella, vilhelm))\nforall x (Untalented(x) -> Ebonize(x, cammie))\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Apprise(x, vilhelm))\nforall x (Apprise(x, anabella) and Apprise(anabella, cammie) -> Afford(anabella, vilhelm))\n\nnot Apprise(cammie, vilhelm)\n\nforall x (Treeless(x) -> Apprise(x, vilhelm)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The cristi is grimy. The cristi reignite the cordy. The cristi narrow the cordy. The cristi dialyze the cordy. The cristi dialyze the saxon. The cordy is grimy. The cordy is biped. The cordy reignite the saxon. The cordy narrow the saxon. The saxon does not see the cordy. If someone narrow the saxon then they are biped. If someone dialyze the cristi and the cristi narrow the saxon then the saxon reignite the cordy. If someone reignite the cordy and they need the cristi then the cristi is tangy. If someone is biped and they see the cristi then the cristi narrow the saxon. If someone narrow the cordy then the cordy reignite the cristi. If someone is tangy then they see the saxon. If someone is grimy then they need the cristi. If someone reignite the cordy and the cordy reignite the saxon then the cordy dialyze the cristi. The saxon narrow the saxon.", "logic": "\nGrimy(cristi)\nReignite(cristi, cordy)\nNarrow(cristi, cordy)\nDialyze(cristi, cordy)\nDialyze(cristi, saxon)\nGrimy(cordy)\nBiped(cordy)\nReignite(cordy, saxon)\nNarrow(cordy, saxon)\nnot Narrow(saxon, cordy)\nforall x (Narrow(x, saxon) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Dialyze(x, cristi) and Narrow(cristi, saxon) -> Reignite(saxon, cordy))\nforall x (Reignite(x, cordy) and Reignite(x, cristi) -> Tangy(cristi))\nforall x (Biped(x) and Narrow(x, cristi) -> Narrow(cristi, saxon))\nforall x (Narrow(x, cordy) -> Reignite(cordy, cristi))\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Narrow(x, saxon))\nforall x (Grimy(x) -> Reignite(x, cristi))\nforall x (Reignite(x, cordy) and Reignite(cordy, saxon) -> Dialyze(cordy, cristi))\n\nNarrow(saxon, saxon)\n\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Narrow(x, saxon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The gill is resonating. The gill purple the pier. The gill mythicize the pier. The gill defalcate the pier. The gill defalcate the edsel. The pier is resonating. The pier is jingling. The pier purple the edsel. The pier mythicize the edsel. The edsel does not see the pier. If someone mythicize the edsel then they are jingling. If someone defalcate the gill and the gill mythicize the edsel then the edsel purple the pier. If someone purple the pier and they need the gill then the gill is mesmeric. If someone is jingling and they see the gill then the gill mythicize the edsel. If someone mythicize the pier then the pier purple the gill. If someone is mesmeric then they see the edsel. If someone is resonating then they need the gill. If someone purple the pier and the pier purple the edsel then the pier defalcate the gill. The edsel is not jingling.", "logic": "\nResonating(gill)\nPurple(gill, pier)\nMythicize(gill, pier)\nDefalcate(gill, pier)\nDefalcate(gill, edsel)\nResonating(pier)\nJingling(pier)\nPurple(pier, edsel)\nMythicize(pier, edsel)\nnot Mythicize(edsel, pier)\nforall x (Mythicize(x, edsel) -> Jingling(x))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, gill) and Mythicize(gill, edsel) -> Purple(edsel, pier))\nforall x (Purple(x, pier) and Purple(x, gill) -> Mesmeric(gill))\nforall x (Jingling(x) and Mythicize(x, gill) -> Mythicize(gill, edsel))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, pier) -> Purple(pier, gill))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) -> Mythicize(x, edsel))\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Purple(x, gill))\nforall x (Purple(x, pier) and Purple(pier, edsel) -> Defalcate(pier, gill))\n\nnot Jingling(edsel)\n\nforall x (Mythicize(x, edsel) -> Jingling(x)) <- forall x (Mesmeric(x) -> Mythicize(x, edsel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The taber is mouselike. The taber motorbike the audrye. The taber span the audrye. The taber powwow the audrye. The taber powwow the gisela. The audrye is mouselike. The audrye is riddled. The audrye motorbike the gisela. The audrye span the gisela. The gisela does not see the audrye. If someone span the gisela then they are riddled. If someone powwow the taber and the taber span the gisela then the gisela motorbike the audrye. If someone motorbike the audrye and they need the taber then the taber is autoimmune. If someone is riddled and they see the taber then the taber span the gisela. If someone span the audrye then the audrye motorbike the taber. If someone is autoimmune then they see the gisela. If someone is mouselike then they need the taber. If someone motorbike the audrye and the audrye motorbike the gisela then the audrye powwow the taber. The gisela powwow the taber.", "logic": "\nMouselike(taber)\nMotorbike(taber, audrye)\nSpan(taber, audrye)\nPowwow(taber, audrye)\nPowwow(taber, gisela)\nMouselike(audrye)\nRiddled(audrye)\nMotorbike(audrye, gisela)\nSpan(audrye, gisela)\nnot Span(gisela, audrye)\nforall x (Span(x, gisela) -> Riddled(x))\nforall x (Powwow(x, taber) and Span(taber, gisela) -> Motorbike(gisela, audrye))\nforall x (Motorbike(x, audrye) and Motorbike(x, taber) -> Autoimmune(taber))\nforall x (Riddled(x) and Span(x, taber) -> Span(taber, gisela))\nforall x (Span(x, audrye) -> Motorbike(audrye, taber))\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Span(x, gisela))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Motorbike(x, taber))\nforall x (Motorbike(x, audrye) and Motorbike(audrye, gisela) -> Powwow(audrye, taber))\n\nPowwow(gisela, taber)\n\nPowwow(gisela, taber) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The zea is sorbed. The zea garland the samuela. The zea predigest the samuela. The zea abide the samuela. The zea abide the christina. The samuela is sorbed. The samuela is infrequent. The samuela garland the christina. The samuela predigest the christina. The christina does not see the samuela. If someone predigest the christina then they are infrequent. If someone abide the zea and the zea predigest the christina then the christina garland the samuela. If someone garland the samuela and they need the zea then the zea is accented. If someone is infrequent and they see the zea then the zea predigest the christina. If someone predigest the samuela then the samuela garland the zea. If someone is accented then they see the christina. If someone is sorbed then they need the zea. If someone garland the samuela and the samuela garland the christina then the samuela abide the zea. The christina is not green.", "logic": "\nSorbed(zea)\nGarland(zea, samuela)\nPredigest(zea, samuela)\nAbide(zea, samuela)\nAbide(zea, christina)\nSorbed(samuela)\nInfrequent(samuela)\nGarland(samuela, christina)\nPredigest(samuela, christina)\nnot Predigest(christina, samuela)\nforall x (Predigest(x, christina) -> Infrequent(x))\nforall x (Abide(x, zea) and Predigest(zea, christina) -> Garland(christina, samuela))\nforall x (Garland(x, samuela) and Garland(x, zea) -> Accented(zea))\nforall x (Infrequent(x) and Predigest(x, zea) -> Predigest(zea, christina))\nforall x (Predigest(x, samuela) -> Garland(samuela, zea))\nforall x (Accented(x) -> Predigest(x, christina))\nforall x (Sorbed(x) -> Garland(x, zea))\nforall x (Garland(x, samuela) and Garland(samuela, christina) -> Abide(samuela, zea))\n\nnot Green(christina)\n\nnot Green(christina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The arly is prospering. The arly barge the vinnie. The arly manure the vinnie. The arly rearrange the vinnie. The arly rearrange the jaime. The vinnie is prospering. The vinnie is hawaiian. The vinnie barge the jaime. The vinnie manure the jaime. The jaime does not see the vinnie. If someone manure the jaime then they are hawaiian. If someone rearrange the arly and the arly manure the jaime then the jaime barge the vinnie. If someone barge the vinnie and they need the arly then the arly is repayable. If someone is hawaiian and they see the arly then the arly manure the jaime. If someone manure the vinnie then the vinnie barge the arly. If someone is repayable then they see the jaime. If someone is prospering then they need the arly. If someone barge the vinnie and the vinnie barge the jaime then the vinnie rearrange the arly. The jaime rearrange the vinnie.", "logic": "\nProspering(arly)\nBarge(arly, vinnie)\nManure(arly, vinnie)\nRearrange(arly, vinnie)\nRearrange(arly, jaime)\nProspering(vinnie)\nHawaiian(vinnie)\nBarge(vinnie, jaime)\nManure(vinnie, jaime)\nnot Manure(jaime, vinnie)\nforall x (Manure(x, jaime) -> Hawaiian(x))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, arly) and Manure(arly, jaime) -> Barge(jaime, vinnie))\nforall x (Barge(x, vinnie) and Barge(x, arly) -> Repayable(arly))\nforall x (Hawaiian(x) and Manure(x, arly) -> Manure(arly, jaime))\nforall x (Manure(x, vinnie) -> Barge(vinnie, arly))\nforall x (Repayable(x) -> Manure(x, jaime))\nforall x (Prospering(x) -> Barge(x, arly))\nforall x (Barge(x, vinnie) and Barge(vinnie, jaime) -> Rearrange(vinnie, arly))\n\nRearrange(jaime, vinnie)\n\nRearrange(jaime, vinnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The cindra is untended. The cindra pollinate the jimmy. The cindra complexion the jimmy. The cindra inventory the jimmy. The cindra inventory the karil. The jimmy is untended. The jimmy is burdenless. The jimmy pollinate the karil. The jimmy complexion the karil. The karil does not see the jimmy. If someone complexion the karil then they are burdenless. If someone inventory the cindra and the cindra complexion the karil then the karil pollinate the jimmy. If someone pollinate the jimmy and they need the cindra then the cindra is basaltic. If someone is burdenless and they see the cindra then the cindra complexion the karil. If someone complexion the jimmy then the jimmy pollinate the cindra. If someone is basaltic then they see the karil. If someone is untended then they need the cindra. If someone pollinate the jimmy and the jimmy pollinate the karil then the jimmy inventory the cindra. The cindra does not see the cindra.", "logic": "\nUntended(cindra)\nPollinate(cindra, jimmy)\nComplexion(cindra, jimmy)\nInventory(cindra, jimmy)\nInventory(cindra, karil)\nUntended(jimmy)\nBurdenless(jimmy)\nPollinate(jimmy, karil)\nComplexion(jimmy, karil)\nnot Complexion(karil, jimmy)\nforall x (Complexion(x, karil) -> Burdenless(x))\nforall x (Inventory(x, cindra) and Complexion(cindra, karil) -> Pollinate(karil, jimmy))\nforall x (Pollinate(x, jimmy) and Pollinate(x, cindra) -> Basaltic(cindra))\nforall x (Burdenless(x) and Complexion(x, cindra) -> Complexion(cindra, karil))\nforall x (Complexion(x, jimmy) -> Pollinate(jimmy, cindra))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) -> Complexion(x, karil))\nforall x (Untended(x) -> Pollinate(x, cindra))\nforall x (Pollinate(x, jimmy) and Pollinate(jimmy, karil) -> Inventory(jimmy, cindra))\n\nnot Complexion(cindra, cindra)\n\nnot Complexion(cindra, cindra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "The kirk is splashed. The kirk ghettoise the cordelie. The kirk liquidise the cordelie. The kirk concenter the cordelie. The kirk concenter the todd. The cordelie is splashed. The cordelie is finnish. The cordelie ghettoise the todd. The cordelie liquidise the todd. The todd does not see the cordelie. If someone liquidise the todd then they are finnish. If someone concenter the kirk and the kirk liquidise the todd then the todd ghettoise the cordelie. If someone ghettoise the cordelie and they need the kirk then the kirk is poignant. If someone is finnish and they see the kirk then the kirk liquidise the todd. If someone liquidise the cordelie then the cordelie ghettoise the kirk. If someone is poignant then they see the todd. If someone is splashed then they need the kirk. If someone ghettoise the cordelie and the cordelie ghettoise the todd then the cordelie concenter the kirk. The kirk is green.", "logic": "\nSplashed(kirk)\nGhettoise(kirk, cordelie)\nLiquidise(kirk, cordelie)\nConcenter(kirk, cordelie)\nConcenter(kirk, todd)\nSplashed(cordelie)\nFinnish(cordelie)\nGhettoise(cordelie, todd)\nLiquidise(cordelie, todd)\nnot Liquidise(todd, cordelie)\nforall x (Liquidise(x, todd) -> Finnish(x))\nforall x (Concenter(x, kirk) and Liquidise(kirk, todd) -> Ghettoise(todd, cordelie))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, cordelie) and Ghettoise(x, kirk) -> Poignant(kirk))\nforall x (Finnish(x) and Liquidise(x, kirk) -> Liquidise(kirk, todd))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, cordelie) -> Ghettoise(cordelie, kirk))\nforall x (Poignant(x) -> Liquidise(x, todd))\nforall x (Splashed(x) -> Ghettoise(x, kirk))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, cordelie) and Ghettoise(cordelie, todd) -> Concenter(cordelie, kirk))\n\nGreen(kirk)\n\nGreen(kirk) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-188"} {"premises": "Alfonse is peaceable. Alfonse is clever. Alfonse is dazed. Roselin is not briefless. Roselin is not jaggy. Roselin is aeonian. Roselin is dazed. If Alfonse is jaggy and Alfonse is clever then Alfonse is not particular. If someone is peaceable and clever then they are aeonian. All briefless, peaceable people are jaggy. Alfonse is peaceable.", "logic": "\nPeaceable(alfonse)\nClever(alfonse)\nDazed(alfonse)\nnot Briefless(roselin)\nnot Jaggy(roselin)\nAeonian(roselin)\nDazed(roselin)\nJaggy(alfonse) and Clever(alfonse) -> not Particular(alfonse)\nforall x (Peaceable(x) and Clever(x) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Briefless(x) and Peaceable(x) -> Jaggy(x))\n\nPeaceable(alfonse)\n\ntherefore Peaceable(alfonse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "Wadsworth is fossil. Wadsworth is cancerous. Wadsworth is seventieth. Serge is not vestibular. Serge is not gibelike. Serge is awless. Serge is seventieth. If Wadsworth is gibelike and Wadsworth is cancerous then Wadsworth is not messianic. If someone is fossil and cancerous then they are awless. All vestibular, fossil people are gibelike. Serge is vestibular.", "logic": "\nFossil(wadsworth)\nCancerous(wadsworth)\nSeventieth(wadsworth)\nnot Vestibular(serge)\nnot Gibelike(serge)\nAwless(serge)\nSeventieth(serge)\nGibelike(wadsworth) and Cancerous(wadsworth) -> not Messianic(wadsworth)\nforall x (Fossil(x) and Cancerous(x) -> Awless(x))\nforall x (Vestibular(x) and Fossil(x) -> Gibelike(x))\n\nVestibular(serge)\n\ntherefore not Vestibular(serge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "Sayer is uneager. Sayer is profuse. Sayer is infertile. Margalo is not sadistic. Margalo is not tenfold. Margalo is tarry. Margalo is infertile. If Sayer is tenfold and Sayer is profuse then Sayer is not rewarding. If someone is uneager and profuse then they are tarry. All sadistic, uneager people are tenfold. Sayer is tarry.", "logic": "\nUneager(sayer)\nProfuse(sayer)\nInfertile(sayer)\nnot Sadistic(margalo)\nnot Tenfold(margalo)\nTarry(margalo)\nInfertile(margalo)\nTenfold(sayer) and Profuse(sayer) -> not Rewarding(sayer)\nforall x (Uneager(x) and Profuse(x) -> Tarry(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Uneager(x) -> Tenfold(x))\n\nTarry(sayer)\n\nUneager(sayer) and Profuse(sayer) and forall x (Uneager(x) and Profuse(x) -> Tarry(x)) -> therefore Tarry(sayer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "Liza is anorthitic. Liza is anticancer. Liza is hierarchal. Rhea is not lexical. Rhea is not kayoed. Rhea is wise. Rhea is hierarchal. If Liza is kayoed and Liza is anticancer then Liza is not unsociable. If someone is anorthitic and anticancer then they are wise. All lexical, anorthitic people are kayoed. Liza is not wise.", "logic": "\nAnorthitic(liza)\nAnticancer(liza)\nHierarchal(liza)\nnot Lexical(rhea)\nnot Kayoed(rhea)\nWise(rhea)\nHierarchal(rhea)\nKayoed(liza) and Anticancer(liza) -> not Unsociable(liza)\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) and Anticancer(x) -> Wise(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) and Anorthitic(x) -> Kayoed(x))\n\nnot Wise(liza)\n\nAnorthitic(liza) and Anticancer(liza) and forall x (Anorthitic(x) and Anticancer(x) -> Wise(x)) -> therefore Wise(liza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "Skye is credulous. Skye is next. Skye is braw. Kissiah is not ingenuous. Kissiah is not disklike. Kissiah is pandemic. Kissiah is braw. If Skye is disklike and Skye is next then Skye is not urgent. If someone is credulous and next then they are pandemic. All ingenuous, credulous people are disklike. Skye is not disklike.", "logic": "\nCredulous(skye)\nNext(skye)\nBraw(skye)\nnot Ingenuous(kissiah)\nnot Disklike(kissiah)\nPandemic(kissiah)\nBraw(kissiah)\nDisklike(skye) and Next(skye) -> not Urgent(skye)\nforall x (Credulous(x) and Next(x) -> Pandemic(x))\nforall x (Ingenuous(x) and Credulous(x) -> Disklike(x))\n\nnot Disklike(skye)\n\nforall x (Ingenuous(x) and Credulous(x) -> Disklike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "Gerome is untracked. Gerome is forcible. Gerome is aetiologic. Zelig is not regional. Zelig is not gauche. Zelig is shrivelled. Zelig is aetiologic. If Gerome is gauche and Gerome is forcible then Gerome is not rakish. If someone is untracked and forcible then they are shrivelled. All regional, untracked people are gauche. Zelig is untracked.", "logic": "\nUntracked(gerome)\nForcible(gerome)\nAetiologic(gerome)\nnot Regional(zelig)\nnot Gauche(zelig)\nShrivelled(zelig)\nAetiologic(zelig)\nGauche(gerome) and Forcible(gerome) -> not Rakish(gerome)\nforall x (Untracked(x) and Forcible(x) -> Shrivelled(x))\nforall x (Regional(x) and Untracked(x) -> Gauche(x))\n\nUntracked(zelig)\n\nUntracked(zelig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "Vijay is neglected. Vijay is recurrent. Vijay is demure. Daisi is not swagger. Daisi is not deific. Daisi is zigzag. Daisi is demure. If Vijay is deific and Vijay is recurrent then Vijay is not glacial. If someone is neglected and recurrent then they are zigzag. All swagger, neglected people are deific. Vijay is not glacial.", "logic": "\nNeglected(vijay)\nRecurrent(vijay)\nDemure(vijay)\nnot Swagger(daisi)\nnot Deific(daisi)\nZigzag(daisi)\nDemure(daisi)\nDeific(vijay) and Recurrent(vijay) -> not Glacial(vijay)\nforall x (Neglected(x) and Recurrent(x) -> Zigzag(x))\nforall x (Swagger(x) and Neglected(x) -> Deific(x))\n\nnot Glacial(vijay)\n\nnot Glacial(vijay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "Ramon is portentous. Ramon is down. Ramon is yogic. Kelsi is not pinched. Kelsi is not prepacked. Kelsi is indicative. Kelsi is yogic. If Ramon is prepacked and Ramon is down then Ramon is not official. If someone is portentous and down then they are indicative. All pinched, portentous people are prepacked. Kelsi is official.", "logic": "\nPortentous(ramon)\nDown(ramon)\nYogic(ramon)\nnot Pinched(kelsi)\nnot Prepacked(kelsi)\nIndicative(kelsi)\nYogic(kelsi)\nPrepacked(ramon) and Down(ramon) -> not Official(ramon)\nforall x (Portentous(x) and Down(x) -> Indicative(x))\nforall x (Pinched(x) and Portentous(x) -> Prepacked(x))\n\nOfficial(kelsi)\n\nOfficial(kelsi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2670"} {"premises": "The dulce is analyzed. The deanne fulminate the bobette. The allys grade the dulce. The bobette grade the deanne. All panoptic people are blotto. If someone underdress the deanne then the deanne is panoptic. If someone is blotto and catatonic then they chase the bobette. If someone underdress the bobette and they are catatonic then they are analyzed. If the deanne is analyzed then the deanne is catatonic. If the allys grade the dulce then the allys underdress the deanne. The bobette grade the deanne.", "logic": "\nAnalyzed(dulce)\nFulminate(deanne, bobette)\nGrade(allys, dulce)\nGrade(bobette, deanne)\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Blotto(x))\nforall x (Underdress(x, deanne) -> Panoptic(deanne))\nforall x (Blotto(x) and Catatonic(x) -> Grade(x, bobette))\nforall x (Underdress(x, bobette) and Catatonic(x) -> Analyzed(x))\nAnalyzed(deanne) -> Catatonic(deanne)\nGrade(allys, dulce) -> Underdress(allys, deanne)\n\nGrade(bobette, deanne)\n\ntherefore Grade(bobette, deanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The meredith is evenhanded. The anabelle accurse the leif. The breanne latch the meredith. The leif latch the anabelle. All zapotec people are cypriot. If someone whoop the anabelle then the anabelle is zapotec. If someone is cypriot and unkindled then they chase the leif. If someone whoop the leif and they are unkindled then they are evenhanded. If the anabelle is evenhanded then the anabelle is unkindled. If the breanne latch the meredith then the breanne whoop the anabelle. The leif does not chase the anabelle.", "logic": "\nEvenhanded(meredith)\nAccurse(anabelle, leif)\nLatch(breanne, meredith)\nLatch(leif, anabelle)\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Cypriot(x))\nforall x (Whoop(x, anabelle) -> Zapotec(anabelle))\nforall x (Cypriot(x) and Unkindled(x) -> Latch(x, leif))\nforall x (Whoop(x, leif) and Unkindled(x) -> Evenhanded(x))\nEvenhanded(anabelle) -> Unkindled(anabelle)\nLatch(breanne, meredith) -> Whoop(breanne, anabelle)\n\nnot Latch(leif, anabelle)\n\ntherefore Latch(leif, anabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The calley is stubbly. The leta strive the kendall. The maryanna lithograph the calley. The kendall lithograph the leta. All basal people are haggard. If someone sodomise the leta then the leta is basal. If someone is haggard and shoreward then they chase the kendall. If someone sodomise the kendall and they are shoreward then they are stubbly. If the leta is stubbly then the leta is shoreward. If the maryanna lithograph the calley then the maryanna sodomise the leta. The maryanna sodomise the leta.", "logic": "\nStubbly(calley)\nStrive(leta, kendall)\nLithograph(maryanna, calley)\nLithograph(kendall, leta)\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Sodomise(x, leta) -> Basal(leta))\nforall x (Haggard(x) and Shoreward(x) -> Lithograph(x, kendall))\nforall x (Sodomise(x, kendall) and Shoreward(x) -> Stubbly(x))\nStubbly(leta) -> Shoreward(leta)\nLithograph(maryanna, calley) -> Sodomise(maryanna, leta)\n\nSodomise(maryanna, leta)\n\nLithograph(maryanna, calley) and Lithograph(maryanna, calley) -> Sodomise(maryanna, leta) -> therefore Sodomise(maryanna, leta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The cariotta is exonerated. The rhianon avert the emmalyn. The arel plead the cariotta. The emmalyn plead the rhianon. All intramural people are clad. If someone finedraw the rhianon then the rhianon is intramural. If someone is clad and blinking then they chase the emmalyn. If someone finedraw the emmalyn and they are blinking then they are exonerated. If the rhianon is exonerated then the rhianon is blinking. If the arel plead the cariotta then the arel finedraw the rhianon. The arel does not visit the rhianon.", "logic": "\nExonerated(cariotta)\nAvert(rhianon, emmalyn)\nPlead(arel, cariotta)\nPlead(emmalyn, rhianon)\nforall x (Intramural(x) -> Clad(x))\nforall x (Finedraw(x, rhianon) -> Intramural(rhianon))\nforall x (Clad(x) and Blinking(x) -> Plead(x, emmalyn))\nforall x (Finedraw(x, emmalyn) and Blinking(x) -> Exonerated(x))\nExonerated(rhianon) -> Blinking(rhianon)\nPlead(arel, cariotta) -> Finedraw(arel, rhianon)\n\nnot Finedraw(arel, rhianon)\n\nPlead(arel, cariotta) and Plead(arel, cariotta) -> Finedraw(arel, rhianon) -> therefore Finedraw(arel, rhianon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The faustina is rational. The mordecai cloak the uriel. The marley patinize the faustina. The uriel patinize the mordecai. All jointed people are impeding. If someone plain the mordecai then the mordecai is jointed. If someone is impeding and scholarly then they chase the uriel. If someone plain the uriel and they are scholarly then they are rational. If the mordecai is rational then the mordecai is scholarly. If the marley patinize the faustina then the marley plain the mordecai. The mordecai is jointed.", "logic": "\nRational(faustina)\nCloak(mordecai, uriel)\nPatinize(marley, faustina)\nPatinize(uriel, mordecai)\nforall x (Jointed(x) -> Impeding(x))\nforall x (Plain(x, mordecai) -> Jointed(mordecai))\nforall x (Impeding(x) and Scholarly(x) -> Patinize(x, uriel))\nforall x (Plain(x, uriel) and Scholarly(x) -> Rational(x))\nRational(mordecai) -> Scholarly(mordecai)\nPatinize(marley, faustina) -> Plain(marley, mordecai)\n\nJointed(mordecai)\n\nPatinize(marley, faustina) and Patinize(marley, faustina) -> Plain(marley, mordecai) -> therefore Plain(marley, mordecai) Plain(marley, mordecai) and forall x (Plain(x, mordecai) -> Jointed(mordecai)) -> therefore Jointed(mordecai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The kore is capsular. The ivory boost the carlee. The jordon inosculate the kore. The carlee inosculate the ivory. All embedded people are damaging. If someone people the ivory then the ivory is embedded. If someone is damaging and monotonous then they chase the carlee. If someone people the carlee and they are monotonous then they are capsular. If the ivory is capsular then the ivory is monotonous. If the jordon inosculate the kore then the jordon people the ivory. The ivory is not embedded.", "logic": "\nCapsular(kore)\nBoost(ivory, carlee)\nInosculate(jordon, kore)\nInosculate(carlee, ivory)\nforall x (Embedded(x) -> Damaging(x))\nforall x (People(x, ivory) -> Embedded(ivory))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and Monotonous(x) -> Inosculate(x, carlee))\nforall x (People(x, carlee) and Monotonous(x) -> Capsular(x))\nCapsular(ivory) -> Monotonous(ivory)\nInosculate(jordon, kore) -> People(jordon, ivory)\n\nnot Embedded(ivory)\n\nInosculate(jordon, kore) and Inosculate(jordon, kore) -> People(jordon, ivory) -> therefore People(jordon, ivory) People(jordon, ivory) and forall x (People(x, ivory) -> Embedded(ivory)) -> therefore Embedded(ivory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The kerry is debonnaire. The gordon salve the pearce. The natalee exsiccate the kerry. The pearce exsiccate the gordon. All tardy people are dangerous. If someone disregard the gordon then the gordon is tardy. If someone is dangerous and caffeinic then they chase the pearce. If someone disregard the pearce and they are caffeinic then they are debonnaire. If the gordon is debonnaire then the gordon is caffeinic. If the natalee exsiccate the kerry then the natalee disregard the gordon. The gordon is dangerous.", "logic": "\nDebonnaire(kerry)\nSalve(gordon, pearce)\nExsiccate(natalee, kerry)\nExsiccate(pearce, gordon)\nforall x (Tardy(x) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Disregard(x, gordon) -> Tardy(gordon))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) and Caffeinic(x) -> Exsiccate(x, pearce))\nforall x (Disregard(x, pearce) and Caffeinic(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\nDebonnaire(gordon) -> Caffeinic(gordon)\nExsiccate(natalee, kerry) -> Disregard(natalee, gordon)\n\nDangerous(gordon)\n\nExsiccate(natalee, kerry) and Exsiccate(natalee, kerry) -> Disregard(natalee, gordon) -> therefore Disregard(natalee, gordon) Disregard(natalee, gordon) and forall x (Disregard(x, gordon) -> Tardy(gordon)) -> therefore Tardy(gordon) Tardy(gordon) and forall x (Tardy(x) -> Dangerous(x)) -> therefore Dangerous(gordon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The yoko is dispensed. The merry miscast the nyssa. The merle preamble the yoko. The nyssa preamble the merry. All streaming people are magnetized. If someone preside the merry then the merry is streaming. If someone is magnetized and rascally then they chase the nyssa. If someone preside the nyssa and they are rascally then they are dispensed. If the merry is dispensed then the merry is rascally. If the merle preamble the yoko then the merle preside the merry. The merry is not magnetized.", "logic": "\nDispensed(yoko)\nMiscast(merry, nyssa)\nPreamble(merle, yoko)\nPreamble(nyssa, merry)\nforall x (Streaming(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nforall x (Preside(x, merry) -> Streaming(merry))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) and Rascally(x) -> Preamble(x, nyssa))\nforall x (Preside(x, nyssa) and Rascally(x) -> Dispensed(x))\nDispensed(merry) -> Rascally(merry)\nPreamble(merle, yoko) -> Preside(merle, merry)\n\nnot Magnetized(merry)\n\nPreamble(merle, yoko) and Preamble(merle, yoko) -> Preside(merle, merry) -> therefore Preside(merle, merry) Preside(merle, merry) and forall x (Preside(x, merry) -> Streaming(merry)) -> therefore Streaming(merry) Streaming(merry) and forall x (Streaming(x) -> Magnetized(x)) -> therefore Magnetized(merry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The juliann is colonised. The alexandra affiance the florinda. The bennie arrive the juliann. The florinda arrive the alexandra. All impudent people are classic. If someone have the alexandra then the alexandra is impudent. If someone is classic and wriggling then they chase the florinda. If someone have the florinda and they are wriggling then they are colonised. If the alexandra is colonised then the alexandra is wriggling. If the bennie arrive the juliann then the bennie have the alexandra. The florinda is not classic.", "logic": "\nColonised(juliann)\nAffiance(alexandra, florinda)\nArrive(bennie, juliann)\nArrive(florinda, alexandra)\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Classic(x))\nforall x (Have(x, alexandra) -> Impudent(alexandra))\nforall x (Classic(x) and Wriggling(x) -> Arrive(x, florinda))\nforall x (Have(x, florinda) and Wriggling(x) -> Colonised(x))\nColonised(alexandra) -> Wriggling(alexandra)\nArrive(bennie, juliann) -> Have(bennie, alexandra)\n\nnot Classic(florinda)\n\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Classic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The kai is wounded. The sharona blush the agathe. The raoul shag the kai. The agathe shag the sharona. All highbrow people are lxxvii. If someone incise the sharona then the sharona is highbrow. If someone is lxxvii and metric then they chase the agathe. If someone incise the agathe and they are metric then they are wounded. If the sharona is wounded then the sharona is metric. If the raoul shag the kai then the raoul incise the sharona. The kai is lxxvii.", "logic": "\nWounded(kai)\nBlush(sharona, agathe)\nShag(raoul, kai)\nShag(agathe, sharona)\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Lxxvii(x))\nforall x (Incise(x, sharona) -> Highbrow(sharona))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) and Metric(x) -> Shag(x, agathe))\nforall x (Incise(x, agathe) and Metric(x) -> Wounded(x))\nWounded(sharona) -> Metric(sharona)\nShag(raoul, kai) -> Incise(raoul, sharona)\n\nLxxvii(kai)\n\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Lxxvii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The lani is indicative. The barbi socialize the blondell. The odessa panel the lani. The blondell panel the barbi. All largo people are leery. If someone rampage the barbi then the barbi is largo. If someone is leery and pointed then they chase the blondell. If someone rampage the blondell and they are pointed then they are indicative. If the barbi is indicative then the barbi is pointed. If the odessa panel the lani then the odessa rampage the barbi. The odessa is not indicative.", "logic": "\nIndicative(lani)\nSocialize(barbi, blondell)\nPanel(odessa, lani)\nPanel(blondell, barbi)\nforall x (Largo(x) -> Leery(x))\nforall x (Rampage(x, barbi) -> Largo(barbi))\nforall x (Leery(x) and Pointed(x) -> Panel(x, blondell))\nforall x (Rampage(x, blondell) and Pointed(x) -> Indicative(x))\nIndicative(barbi) -> Pointed(barbi)\nPanel(odessa, lani) -> Rampage(odessa, barbi)\n\nnot Indicative(odessa)\n\nforall x (Rampage(x, blondell) and Pointed(x) -> Indicative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The nestor is stonelike. The ash interdict the kaitlyn. The lynde publicize the nestor. The kaitlyn publicize the ash. All laudable people are adducent. If someone recode the ash then the ash is laudable. If someone is adducent and effected then they chase the kaitlyn. If someone recode the kaitlyn and they are effected then they are stonelike. If the ash is stonelike then the ash is effected. If the lynde publicize the nestor then the lynde recode the ash. The ash publicize the kaitlyn.", "logic": "\nStonelike(nestor)\nInterdict(ash, kaitlyn)\nPublicize(lynde, nestor)\nPublicize(kaitlyn, ash)\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Adducent(x))\nforall x (Recode(x, ash) -> Laudable(ash))\nforall x (Adducent(x) and Effected(x) -> Publicize(x, kaitlyn))\nforall x (Recode(x, kaitlyn) and Effected(x) -> Stonelike(x))\nStonelike(ash) -> Effected(ash)\nPublicize(lynde, nestor) -> Recode(lynde, ash)\n\nPublicize(ash, kaitlyn)\n\nforall x (Adducent(x) and Effected(x) -> Publicize(x, kaitlyn)) <- Stonelike(ash) -> Effected(ash) <- forall x (Recode(x, kaitlyn) and Effected(x) -> Stonelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The moises is coastwise. The isadore chisel the laurette. The jonas reanimate the moises. The laurette reanimate the isadore. All continuous people are unwilled. If someone birl the isadore then the isadore is continuous. If someone is unwilled and daedal then they chase the laurette. If someone birl the laurette and they are daedal then they are coastwise. If the isadore is coastwise then the isadore is daedal. If the jonas reanimate the moises then the jonas birl the isadore. The laurette is not continuous.", "logic": "\nCoastwise(moises)\nChisel(isadore, laurette)\nReanimate(jonas, moises)\nReanimate(laurette, isadore)\nforall x (Continuous(x) -> Unwilled(x))\nforall x (Birl(x, isadore) -> Continuous(isadore))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and Daedal(x) -> Reanimate(x, laurette))\nforall x (Birl(x, laurette) and Daedal(x) -> Coastwise(x))\nCoastwise(isadore) -> Daedal(isadore)\nReanimate(jonas, moises) -> Birl(jonas, isadore)\n\nnot Continuous(laurette)\n\nnot Continuous(laurette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The gomer is anasarcous. The averill caddy the merla. The mari encourage the gomer. The merla encourage the averill. All puissant people are textual. If someone hectograph the averill then the averill is puissant. If someone is textual and columbian then they chase the merla. If someone hectograph the merla and they are columbian then they are anasarcous. If the averill is anasarcous then the averill is columbian. If the mari encourage the gomer then the mari hectograph the averill. The gomer is puissant.", "logic": "\nAnasarcous(gomer)\nCaddy(averill, merla)\nEncourage(mari, gomer)\nEncourage(merla, averill)\nforall x (Puissant(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Hectograph(x, averill) -> Puissant(averill))\nforall x (Textual(x) and Columbian(x) -> Encourage(x, merla))\nforall x (Hectograph(x, merla) and Columbian(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nAnasarcous(averill) -> Columbian(averill)\nEncourage(mari, gomer) -> Hectograph(mari, averill)\n\nPuissant(gomer)\n\nPuissant(gomer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The nickolas is intolerant. The porter accustom the misha. The maureen account the nickolas. The misha account the porter. All impartial people are exogamic. If someone disavow the porter then the porter is impartial. If someone is exogamic and cliquish then they chase the misha. If someone disavow the misha and they are cliquish then they are intolerant. If the porter is intolerant then the porter is cliquish. If the maureen account the nickolas then the maureen disavow the porter. The misha does not visit the porter.", "logic": "\nIntolerant(nickolas)\nAccustom(porter, misha)\nAccount(maureen, nickolas)\nAccount(misha, porter)\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Disavow(x, porter) -> Impartial(porter))\nforall x (Exogamic(x) and Cliquish(x) -> Account(x, misha))\nforall x (Disavow(x, misha) and Cliquish(x) -> Intolerant(x))\nIntolerant(porter) -> Cliquish(porter)\nAccount(maureen, nickolas) -> Disavow(maureen, porter)\n\nnot Disavow(misha, porter)\n\nnot Disavow(misha, porter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The dimitrios is antonymous. The ethelda omit the will. The novelia bristle the dimitrios. The will bristle the ethelda. All gloved people are luckless. If someone configure the ethelda then the ethelda is gloved. If someone is luckless and rollicking then they chase the will. If someone configure the will and they are rollicking then they are antonymous. If the ethelda is antonymous then the ethelda is rollicking. If the novelia bristle the dimitrios then the novelia configure the ethelda. The dimitrios omit the novelia.", "logic": "\nAntonymous(dimitrios)\nOmit(ethelda, will)\nBristle(novelia, dimitrios)\nBristle(will, ethelda)\nforall x (Gloved(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Configure(x, ethelda) -> Gloved(ethelda))\nforall x (Luckless(x) and Rollicking(x) -> Bristle(x, will))\nforall x (Configure(x, will) and Rollicking(x) -> Antonymous(x))\nAntonymous(ethelda) -> Rollicking(ethelda)\nBristle(novelia, dimitrios) -> Configure(novelia, ethelda)\n\nOmit(dimitrios, novelia)\n\nOmit(dimitrios, novelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-888"} {"premises": "The korney diverge the anders. The korney nicker the lena. The korney does not eat the naomi. The korney is mystifying. The korney does not see the lena. The anders diverge the korney. The anders diverge the naomi. The anders nicker the naomi. The anders is clxv. The anders is mystifying. The anders misfire the naomi. The lena nicker the anders. The lena nicker the naomi. The lena is upturned. The lena misfire the naomi. The naomi is masked. If something is masked then it does not chase the lena. If something diverge the lena then it nicker the anders. If something diverge the korney and the korney does not see the lena then the korney diverge the lena. If something nicker the anders then it diverge the korney. If the lena diverge the anders and the naomi does not eat the lena then the lena misfire the anders. If something misfire the anders then it nicker the naomi. If something is upturned then it does not eat the korney. If something diverge the lena then the lena diverge the anders. The anders nicker the naomi.", "logic": "\nDiverge(korney, anders)\nNicker(korney, lena)\nnot Nicker(korney, naomi)\nMystifying(korney)\nnot Misfire(korney, lena)\nDiverge(anders, korney)\nDiverge(anders, naomi)\nNicker(anders, naomi)\nClxv(anders)\nMystifying(anders)\nMisfire(anders, naomi)\nNicker(lena, anders)\nNicker(lena, naomi)\nUpturned(lena)\nMisfire(lena, naomi)\nMasked(naomi)\nforall x (Masked(x) -> not Diverge(x, lena))\nforall x (Diverge(x, lena) -> Nicker(x, anders))\nforall x (Diverge(x, korney) and not Misfire(korney, lena) -> Diverge(korney, lena))\nforall x (Nicker(x, anders) -> Diverge(x, korney))\nDiverge(lena, anders) and not Nicker(naomi, lena) -> Misfire(lena, anders)\nforall x (Misfire(x, anders) -> Nicker(x, naomi))\nforall x (Upturned(x) -> not Nicker(x, korney))\nforall x (Diverge(x, lena) -> Diverge(lena, anders))\n\nNicker(anders, naomi)\n\ntherefore Nicker(anders, naomi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The danyette sprint the verile. The danyette inoculate the gusti. The danyette does not eat the jude. The danyette is papistic. The danyette does not see the gusti. The verile sprint the danyette. The verile sprint the jude. The verile inoculate the jude. The verile is unordered. The verile is papistic. The verile motivate the jude. The gusti inoculate the verile. The gusti inoculate the jude. The gusti is gaumless. The gusti motivate the jude. The jude is daunted. If something is daunted then it does not chase the gusti. If something sprint the gusti then it inoculate the verile. If something sprint the danyette and the danyette does not see the gusti then the danyette sprint the gusti. If something inoculate the verile then it sprint the danyette. If the gusti sprint the verile and the jude does not eat the gusti then the gusti motivate the verile. If something motivate the verile then it inoculate the jude. If something is gaumless then it does not eat the danyette. If something sprint the gusti then the gusti sprint the verile. The danyette is not papistic.", "logic": "\nSprint(danyette, verile)\nInoculate(danyette, gusti)\nnot Inoculate(danyette, jude)\nPapistic(danyette)\nnot Motivate(danyette, gusti)\nSprint(verile, danyette)\nSprint(verile, jude)\nInoculate(verile, jude)\nUnordered(verile)\nPapistic(verile)\nMotivate(verile, jude)\nInoculate(gusti, verile)\nInoculate(gusti, jude)\nGaumless(gusti)\nMotivate(gusti, jude)\nDaunted(jude)\nforall x (Daunted(x) -> not Sprint(x, gusti))\nforall x (Sprint(x, gusti) -> Inoculate(x, verile))\nforall x (Sprint(x, danyette) and not Motivate(danyette, gusti) -> Sprint(danyette, gusti))\nforall x (Inoculate(x, verile) -> Sprint(x, danyette))\nSprint(gusti, verile) and not Inoculate(jude, gusti) -> Motivate(gusti, verile)\nforall x (Motivate(x, verile) -> Inoculate(x, jude))\nforall x (Gaumless(x) -> not Inoculate(x, danyette))\nforall x (Sprint(x, gusti) -> Sprint(gusti, verile))\n\nnot Papistic(danyette)\n\ntherefore Papistic(danyette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The joyan overwinter the charil. The joyan offend the lurline. The joyan does not eat the terry. The joyan is froward. The joyan does not see the lurline. The charil overwinter the joyan. The charil overwinter the terry. The charil offend the terry. The charil is tanzanian. The charil is froward. The charil jest the terry. The lurline offend the charil. The lurline offend the terry. The lurline is iridic. The lurline jest the terry. The terry is meltable. If something is meltable then it does not chase the lurline. If something overwinter the lurline then it offend the charil. If something overwinter the joyan and the joyan does not see the lurline then the joyan overwinter the lurline. If something offend the charil then it overwinter the joyan. If the lurline overwinter the charil and the terry does not eat the lurline then the lurline jest the charil. If something jest the charil then it offend the terry. If something is iridic then it does not eat the joyan. If something overwinter the lurline then the lurline overwinter the charil. The lurline does not eat the joyan.", "logic": "\nOverwinter(joyan, charil)\nOffend(joyan, lurline)\nnot Offend(joyan, terry)\nFroward(joyan)\nnot Jest(joyan, lurline)\nOverwinter(charil, joyan)\nOverwinter(charil, terry)\nOffend(charil, terry)\nTanzanian(charil)\nFroward(charil)\nJest(charil, terry)\nOffend(lurline, charil)\nOffend(lurline, terry)\nIridic(lurline)\nJest(lurline, terry)\nMeltable(terry)\nforall x (Meltable(x) -> not Overwinter(x, lurline))\nforall x (Overwinter(x, lurline) -> Offend(x, charil))\nforall x (Overwinter(x, joyan) and not Jest(joyan, lurline) -> Overwinter(joyan, lurline))\nforall x (Offend(x, charil) -> Overwinter(x, joyan))\nOverwinter(lurline, charil) and not Offend(terry, lurline) -> Jest(lurline, charil)\nforall x (Jest(x, charil) -> Offend(x, terry))\nforall x (Iridic(x) -> not Offend(x, joyan))\nforall x (Overwinter(x, lurline) -> Overwinter(lurline, charil))\n\nnot Offend(lurline, joyan)\n\nIridic(lurline) and forall x (Iridic(x) -> not Offend(x, joyan)) -> therefore not Offend(lurline, joyan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The nester dodge the xever. The nester excise the katine. The nester does not eat the karla. The nester is bilobated. The nester does not see the katine. The xever dodge the nester. The xever dodge the karla. The xever excise the karla. The xever is forceful. The xever is bilobated. The xever lustrate the karla. The katine excise the xever. The katine excise the karla. The katine is bruneian. The katine lustrate the karla. The karla is weighted. If something is weighted then it does not chase the katine. If something dodge the katine then it excise the xever. If something dodge the nester and the nester does not see the katine then the nester dodge the katine. If something excise the xever then it dodge the nester. If the katine dodge the xever and the karla does not eat the katine then the katine lustrate the xever. If something lustrate the xever then it excise the karla. If something is bruneian then it does not eat the nester. If something dodge the katine then the katine dodge the xever. The katine does not chase the nester.", "logic": "\nDodge(nester, xever)\nExcise(nester, katine)\nnot Excise(nester, karla)\nBilobated(nester)\nnot Lustrate(nester, katine)\nDodge(xever, nester)\nDodge(xever, karla)\nExcise(xever, karla)\nForceful(xever)\nBilobated(xever)\nLustrate(xever, karla)\nExcise(katine, xever)\nExcise(katine, karla)\nBruneian(katine)\nLustrate(katine, karla)\nWeighted(karla)\nforall x (Weighted(x) -> not Dodge(x, katine))\nforall x (Dodge(x, katine) -> Excise(x, xever))\nforall x (Dodge(x, nester) and not Lustrate(nester, katine) -> Dodge(nester, katine))\nforall x (Excise(x, xever) -> Dodge(x, nester))\nDodge(katine, xever) and not Excise(karla, katine) -> Lustrate(katine, xever)\nforall x (Lustrate(x, xever) -> Excise(x, karla))\nforall x (Bruneian(x) -> not Excise(x, nester))\nforall x (Dodge(x, katine) -> Dodge(katine, xever))\n\nnot Dodge(katine, nester)\n\nExcise(katine, xever) and forall x (Excise(x, xever) -> Dodge(x, nester)) -> therefore Dodge(katine, nester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The tiffanie depart the clarette. The tiffanie deputise the rochester. The tiffanie does not eat the erhart. The tiffanie is doleful. The tiffanie does not see the rochester. The clarette depart the tiffanie. The clarette depart the erhart. The clarette deputise the erhart. The clarette is smuggled. The clarette is doleful. The clarette impress the erhart. The rochester deputise the clarette. The rochester deputise the erhart. The rochester is mesial. The rochester impress the erhart. The erhart is blinded. If something is blinded then it does not chase the rochester. If something depart the rochester then it deputise the clarette. If something depart the tiffanie and the tiffanie does not see the rochester then the tiffanie depart the rochester. If something deputise the clarette then it depart the tiffanie. If the rochester depart the clarette and the erhart does not eat the rochester then the rochester impress the clarette. If something impress the clarette then it deputise the erhart. If something is mesial then it does not eat the tiffanie. If something depart the rochester then the rochester depart the clarette. The tiffanie deputise the clarette.", "logic": "\nDepart(tiffanie, clarette)\nDeputise(tiffanie, rochester)\nnot Deputise(tiffanie, erhart)\nDoleful(tiffanie)\nnot Impress(tiffanie, rochester)\nDepart(clarette, tiffanie)\nDepart(clarette, erhart)\nDeputise(clarette, erhart)\nSmuggled(clarette)\nDoleful(clarette)\nImpress(clarette, erhart)\nDeputise(rochester, clarette)\nDeputise(rochester, erhart)\nMesial(rochester)\nImpress(rochester, erhart)\nBlinded(erhart)\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> not Depart(x, rochester))\nforall x (Depart(x, rochester) -> Deputise(x, clarette))\nforall x (Depart(x, tiffanie) and not Impress(tiffanie, rochester) -> Depart(tiffanie, rochester))\nforall x (Deputise(x, clarette) -> Depart(x, tiffanie))\nDepart(rochester, clarette) and not Deputise(erhart, rochester) -> Impress(rochester, clarette)\nforall x (Impress(x, clarette) -> Deputise(x, erhart))\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> not Deputise(x, tiffanie))\nforall x (Depart(x, rochester) -> Depart(rochester, clarette))\n\nDeputise(tiffanie, clarette)\n\nDepart(clarette, tiffanie) and not Impress(tiffanie, rochester) and forall x (Depart(x, tiffanie) and not Impress(tiffanie, rochester) -> Depart(tiffanie, rochester)) -> therefore Depart(tiffanie, rochester) Depart(tiffanie, rochester) and forall x (Depart(x, rochester) -> Deputise(x, clarette)) -> therefore Deputise(tiffanie, clarette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The willie spur the teri. The willie toll the bubba. The willie does not eat the elke. The willie is level. The willie does not see the bubba. The teri spur the willie. The teri spur the elke. The teri toll the elke. The teri is lxxiii. The teri is level. The teri succumb the elke. The bubba toll the teri. The bubba toll the elke. The bubba is prognostic. The bubba succumb the elke. The elke is unordered. If something is unordered then it does not chase the bubba. If something spur the bubba then it toll the teri. If something spur the willie and the willie does not see the bubba then the willie spur the bubba. If something toll the teri then it spur the willie. If the bubba spur the teri and the elke does not eat the bubba then the bubba succumb the teri. If something succumb the teri then it toll the elke. If something is prognostic then it does not eat the willie. If something spur the bubba then the bubba spur the teri. The bubba does not chase the teri.", "logic": "\nSpur(willie, teri)\nToll(willie, bubba)\nnot Toll(willie, elke)\nLevel(willie)\nnot Succumb(willie, bubba)\nSpur(teri, willie)\nSpur(teri, elke)\nToll(teri, elke)\nLxxiii(teri)\nLevel(teri)\nSuccumb(teri, elke)\nToll(bubba, teri)\nToll(bubba, elke)\nPrognostic(bubba)\nSuccumb(bubba, elke)\nUnordered(elke)\nforall x (Unordered(x) -> not Spur(x, bubba))\nforall x (Spur(x, bubba) -> Toll(x, teri))\nforall x (Spur(x, willie) and not Succumb(willie, bubba) -> Spur(willie, bubba))\nforall x (Toll(x, teri) -> Spur(x, willie))\nSpur(bubba, teri) and not Toll(elke, bubba) -> Succumb(bubba, teri)\nforall x (Succumb(x, teri) -> Toll(x, elke))\nforall x (Prognostic(x) -> not Toll(x, willie))\nforall x (Spur(x, bubba) -> Spur(bubba, teri))\n\nnot Spur(bubba, teri)\n\nSpur(teri, willie) and not Succumb(willie, bubba) and forall x (Spur(x, willie) and not Succumb(willie, bubba) -> Spur(willie, bubba)) -> therefore Spur(willie, bubba) Spur(willie, bubba) and forall x (Spur(x, bubba) -> Spur(bubba, teri)) -> therefore Spur(bubba, teri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The storey dissemble the beryle. The storey edulcorate the adelaide. The storey does not eat the tabb. The storey is worthful. The storey does not see the adelaide. The beryle dissemble the storey. The beryle dissemble the tabb. The beryle edulcorate the tabb. The beryle is shuha. The beryle is worthful. The beryle promulgate the tabb. The adelaide edulcorate the beryle. The adelaide edulcorate the tabb. The adelaide is adactylous. The adelaide promulgate the tabb. The tabb is grouped. If something is grouped then it does not chase the adelaide. If something dissemble the adelaide then it edulcorate the beryle. If something dissemble the storey and the storey does not see the adelaide then the storey dissemble the adelaide. If something edulcorate the beryle then it dissemble the storey. If the adelaide dissemble the beryle and the tabb does not eat the adelaide then the adelaide promulgate the beryle. If something promulgate the beryle then it edulcorate the tabb. If something is adactylous then it does not eat the storey. If something dissemble the adelaide then the adelaide dissemble the beryle. The storey dissemble the storey.", "logic": "\nDissemble(storey, beryle)\nEdulcorate(storey, adelaide)\nnot Edulcorate(storey, tabb)\nWorthful(storey)\nnot Promulgate(storey, adelaide)\nDissemble(beryle, storey)\nDissemble(beryle, tabb)\nEdulcorate(beryle, tabb)\nShuha(beryle)\nWorthful(beryle)\nPromulgate(beryle, tabb)\nEdulcorate(adelaide, beryle)\nEdulcorate(adelaide, tabb)\nAdactylous(adelaide)\nPromulgate(adelaide, tabb)\nGrouped(tabb)\nforall x (Grouped(x) -> not Dissemble(x, adelaide))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, adelaide) -> Edulcorate(x, beryle))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, storey) and not Promulgate(storey, adelaide) -> Dissemble(storey, adelaide))\nforall x (Edulcorate(x, beryle) -> Dissemble(x, storey))\nDissemble(adelaide, beryle) and not Edulcorate(tabb, adelaide) -> Promulgate(adelaide, beryle)\nforall x (Promulgate(x, beryle) -> Edulcorate(x, tabb))\nforall x (Adactylous(x) -> not Edulcorate(x, storey))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, adelaide) -> Dissemble(adelaide, beryle))\n\nDissemble(storey, storey)\n\nDissemble(beryle, storey) and not Promulgate(storey, adelaide) and forall x (Dissemble(x, storey) and not Promulgate(storey, adelaide) -> Dissemble(storey, adelaide)) -> therefore Dissemble(storey, adelaide) Dissemble(storey, adelaide) and forall x (Dissemble(x, adelaide) -> Edulcorate(x, beryle)) -> therefore Edulcorate(storey, beryle) Edulcorate(storey, beryle) and forall x (Edulcorate(x, beryle) -> Dissemble(x, storey)) -> therefore Dissemble(storey, storey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The dunc welsh the pedro. The dunc photograph the sharleen. The dunc does not eat the dee. The dunc is dislocated. The dunc does not see the sharleen. The pedro welsh the dunc. The pedro welsh the dee. The pedro photograph the dee. The pedro is literate. The pedro is dislocated. The pedro tribulate the dee. The sharleen photograph the pedro. The sharleen photograph the dee. The sharleen is eulogistic. The sharleen tribulate the dee. The dee is paleozoic. If something is paleozoic then it does not chase the sharleen. If something welsh the sharleen then it photograph the pedro. If something welsh the dunc and the dunc does not see the sharleen then the dunc welsh the sharleen. If something photograph the pedro then it welsh the dunc. If the sharleen welsh the pedro and the dee does not eat the sharleen then the sharleen tribulate the pedro. If something tribulate the pedro then it photograph the dee. If something is eulogistic then it does not eat the dunc. If something welsh the sharleen then the sharleen welsh the pedro. The dunc does not chase the dunc.", "logic": "\nWelsh(dunc, pedro)\nPhotograph(dunc, sharleen)\nnot Photograph(dunc, dee)\nDislocated(dunc)\nnot Tribulate(dunc, sharleen)\nWelsh(pedro, dunc)\nWelsh(pedro, dee)\nPhotograph(pedro, dee)\nLiterate(pedro)\nDislocated(pedro)\nTribulate(pedro, dee)\nPhotograph(sharleen, pedro)\nPhotograph(sharleen, dee)\nEulogistic(sharleen)\nTribulate(sharleen, dee)\nPaleozoic(dee)\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) -> not Welsh(x, sharleen))\nforall x (Welsh(x, sharleen) -> Photograph(x, pedro))\nforall x (Welsh(x, dunc) and not Tribulate(dunc, sharleen) -> Welsh(dunc, sharleen))\nforall x (Photograph(x, pedro) -> Welsh(x, dunc))\nWelsh(sharleen, pedro) and not Photograph(dee, sharleen) -> Tribulate(sharleen, pedro)\nforall x (Tribulate(x, pedro) -> Photograph(x, dee))\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) -> not Photograph(x, dunc))\nforall x (Welsh(x, sharleen) -> Welsh(sharleen, pedro))\n\nnot Welsh(dunc, dunc)\n\nWelsh(pedro, dunc) and not Tribulate(dunc, sharleen) and forall x (Welsh(x, dunc) and not Tribulate(dunc, sharleen) -> Welsh(dunc, sharleen)) -> therefore Welsh(dunc, sharleen) Welsh(dunc, sharleen) and forall x (Welsh(x, sharleen) -> Photograph(x, pedro)) -> therefore Photograph(dunc, pedro) Photograph(dunc, pedro) and forall x (Photograph(x, pedro) -> Welsh(x, dunc)) -> therefore Welsh(dunc, dunc)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The farrah spud the emylee. The farrah preview the zondra. The farrah does not eat the lorianne. The farrah is long. The farrah does not see the zondra. The emylee spud the farrah. The emylee spud the lorianne. The emylee preview the lorianne. The emylee is infrasonic. The emylee is long. The emylee biff the lorianne. The zondra preview the emylee. The zondra preview the lorianne. The zondra is scotch. The zondra biff the lorianne. The lorianne is able. If something is able then it does not chase the zondra. If something spud the zondra then it preview the emylee. If something spud the farrah and the farrah does not see the zondra then the farrah spud the zondra. If something preview the emylee then it spud the farrah. If the zondra spud the emylee and the lorianne does not eat the zondra then the zondra biff the emylee. If something biff the emylee then it preview the lorianne. If something is scotch then it does not eat the farrah. If something spud the zondra then the zondra spud the emylee. The lorianne does not chase the farrah.", "logic": "\nSpud(farrah, emylee)\nPreview(farrah, zondra)\nnot Preview(farrah, lorianne)\nLong(farrah)\nnot Biff(farrah, zondra)\nSpud(emylee, farrah)\nSpud(emylee, lorianne)\nPreview(emylee, lorianne)\nInfrasonic(emylee)\nLong(emylee)\nBiff(emylee, lorianne)\nPreview(zondra, emylee)\nPreview(zondra, lorianne)\nScotch(zondra)\nBiff(zondra, lorianne)\nAble(lorianne)\nforall x (Able(x) -> not Spud(x, zondra))\nforall x (Spud(x, zondra) -> Preview(x, emylee))\nforall x (Spud(x, farrah) and not Biff(farrah, zondra) -> Spud(farrah, zondra))\nforall x (Preview(x, emylee) -> Spud(x, farrah))\nSpud(zondra, emylee) and not Preview(lorianne, zondra) -> Biff(zondra, emylee)\nforall x (Biff(x, emylee) -> Preview(x, lorianne))\nforall x (Scotch(x) -> not Preview(x, farrah))\nforall x (Spud(x, zondra) -> Spud(zondra, emylee))\n\nnot Spud(lorianne, farrah)\n\nforall x (Preview(x, emylee) -> Spud(x, farrah)) <- forall x (Spud(x, zondra) -> Preview(x, emylee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The forest puddle the fraser. The forest launder the athene. The forest does not eat the anni. The forest is egregious. The forest does not see the athene. The fraser puddle the forest. The fraser puddle the anni. The fraser launder the anni. The fraser is meagerly. The fraser is egregious. The fraser deflagrate the anni. The athene launder the fraser. The athene launder the anni. The athene is inviolate. The athene deflagrate the anni. The anni is northern. If something is northern then it does not chase the athene. If something puddle the athene then it launder the fraser. If something puddle the forest and the forest does not see the athene then the forest puddle the athene. If something launder the fraser then it puddle the forest. If the athene puddle the fraser and the anni does not eat the athene then the athene deflagrate the fraser. If something deflagrate the fraser then it launder the anni. If something is inviolate then it does not eat the forest. If something puddle the athene then the athene puddle the fraser. The anni launder the fraser.", "logic": "\nPuddle(forest, fraser)\nLaunder(forest, athene)\nnot Launder(forest, anni)\nEgregious(forest)\nnot Deflagrate(forest, athene)\nPuddle(fraser, forest)\nPuddle(fraser, anni)\nLaunder(fraser, anni)\nMeagerly(fraser)\nEgregious(fraser)\nDeflagrate(fraser, anni)\nLaunder(athene, fraser)\nLaunder(athene, anni)\nInviolate(athene)\nDeflagrate(athene, anni)\nNorthern(anni)\nforall x (Northern(x) -> not Puddle(x, athene))\nforall x (Puddle(x, athene) -> Launder(x, fraser))\nforall x (Puddle(x, forest) and not Deflagrate(forest, athene) -> Puddle(forest, athene))\nforall x (Launder(x, fraser) -> Puddle(x, forest))\nPuddle(athene, fraser) and not Launder(anni, athene) -> Deflagrate(athene, fraser)\nforall x (Deflagrate(x, fraser) -> Launder(x, anni))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) -> not Launder(x, forest))\nforall x (Puddle(x, athene) -> Puddle(athene, fraser))\n\nLaunder(anni, fraser)\n\nforall x (Puddle(x, athene) -> Launder(x, fraser)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The judi scan the chantalle. The judi citify the randene. The judi does not eat the florella. The judi is diabetic. The judi does not see the randene. The chantalle scan the judi. The chantalle scan the florella. The chantalle citify the florella. The chantalle is benignant. The chantalle is diabetic. The chantalle remove the florella. The randene citify the chantalle. The randene citify the florella. The randene is detachable. The randene remove the florella. The florella is conjugate. If something is conjugate then it does not chase the randene. If something scan the randene then it citify the chantalle. If something scan the judi and the judi does not see the randene then the judi scan the randene. If something citify the chantalle then it scan the judi. If the randene scan the chantalle and the florella does not eat the randene then the randene remove the chantalle. If something remove the chantalle then it citify the florella. If something is detachable then it does not eat the judi. If something scan the randene then the randene scan the chantalle. The randene does not see the chantalle.", "logic": "\nScan(judi, chantalle)\nCitify(judi, randene)\nnot Citify(judi, florella)\nDiabetic(judi)\nnot Remove(judi, randene)\nScan(chantalle, judi)\nScan(chantalle, florella)\nCitify(chantalle, florella)\nBenignant(chantalle)\nDiabetic(chantalle)\nRemove(chantalle, florella)\nCitify(randene, chantalle)\nCitify(randene, florella)\nDetachable(randene)\nRemove(randene, florella)\nConjugate(florella)\nforall x (Conjugate(x) -> not Scan(x, randene))\nforall x (Scan(x, randene) -> Citify(x, chantalle))\nforall x (Scan(x, judi) and not Remove(judi, randene) -> Scan(judi, randene))\nforall x (Citify(x, chantalle) -> Scan(x, judi))\nScan(randene, chantalle) and not Citify(florella, randene) -> Remove(randene, chantalle)\nforall x (Remove(x, chantalle) -> Citify(x, florella))\nforall x (Detachable(x) -> not Citify(x, judi))\nforall x (Scan(x, randene) -> Scan(randene, chantalle))\n\nnot Remove(randene, chantalle)\n\nScan(randene, chantalle) and not Citify(florella, randene) -> Remove(randene, chantalle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The sergio alcoholise the kermit. The sergio brisk the barnard. The sergio does not eat the nata. The sergio is jesuitical. The sergio does not see the barnard. The kermit alcoholise the sergio. The kermit alcoholise the nata. The kermit brisk the nata. The kermit is risen. The kermit is jesuitical. The kermit wisecrack the nata. The barnard brisk the kermit. The barnard brisk the nata. The barnard is unwished. The barnard wisecrack the nata. The nata is insolent. If something is insolent then it does not chase the barnard. If something alcoholise the barnard then it brisk the kermit. If something alcoholise the sergio and the sergio does not see the barnard then the sergio alcoholise the barnard. If something brisk the kermit then it alcoholise the sergio. If the barnard alcoholise the kermit and the nata does not eat the barnard then the barnard wisecrack the kermit. If something wisecrack the kermit then it brisk the nata. If something is unwished then it does not eat the sergio. If something alcoholise the barnard then the barnard alcoholise the kermit. The kermit brisk the kermit.", "logic": "\nAlcoholise(sergio, kermit)\nBrisk(sergio, barnard)\nnot Brisk(sergio, nata)\nJesuitical(sergio)\nnot Wisecrack(sergio, barnard)\nAlcoholise(kermit, sergio)\nAlcoholise(kermit, nata)\nBrisk(kermit, nata)\nRisen(kermit)\nJesuitical(kermit)\nWisecrack(kermit, nata)\nBrisk(barnard, kermit)\nBrisk(barnard, nata)\nUnwished(barnard)\nWisecrack(barnard, nata)\nInsolent(nata)\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> not Alcoholise(x, barnard))\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, barnard) -> Brisk(x, kermit))\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, sergio) and not Wisecrack(sergio, barnard) -> Alcoholise(sergio, barnard))\nforall x (Brisk(x, kermit) -> Alcoholise(x, sergio))\nAlcoholise(barnard, kermit) and not Brisk(nata, barnard) -> Wisecrack(barnard, kermit)\nforall x (Wisecrack(x, kermit) -> Brisk(x, nata))\nforall x (Unwished(x) -> not Brisk(x, sergio))\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, barnard) -> Alcoholise(barnard, kermit))\n\nBrisk(kermit, kermit)\n\nforall x (Alcoholise(x, barnard) -> Brisk(x, kermit)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The josy slew the kali. The josy demystify the simonne. The josy does not eat the susette. The josy is sublimed. The josy does not see the simonne. The kali slew the josy. The kali slew the susette. The kali demystify the susette. The kali is champion. The kali is sublimed. The kali spell the susette. The simonne demystify the kali. The simonne demystify the susette. The simonne is cragged. The simonne spell the susette. The susette is painted. If something is painted then it does not chase the simonne. If something slew the simonne then it demystify the kali. If something slew the josy and the josy does not see the simonne then the josy slew the simonne. If something demystify the kali then it slew the josy. If the simonne slew the kali and the susette does not eat the simonne then the simonne spell the kali. If something spell the kali then it demystify the susette. If something is cragged then it does not eat the josy. If something slew the simonne then the simonne slew the kali. The josy does not see the josy.", "logic": "\nSlew(josy, kali)\nDemystify(josy, simonne)\nnot Demystify(josy, susette)\nSublimed(josy)\nnot Spell(josy, simonne)\nSlew(kali, josy)\nSlew(kali, susette)\nDemystify(kali, susette)\nChampion(kali)\nSublimed(kali)\nSpell(kali, susette)\nDemystify(simonne, kali)\nDemystify(simonne, susette)\nCragged(simonne)\nSpell(simonne, susette)\nPainted(susette)\nforall x (Painted(x) -> not Slew(x, simonne))\nforall x (Slew(x, simonne) -> Demystify(x, kali))\nforall x (Slew(x, josy) and not Spell(josy, simonne) -> Slew(josy, simonne))\nforall x (Demystify(x, kali) -> Slew(x, josy))\nSlew(simonne, kali) and not Demystify(susette, simonne) -> Spell(simonne, kali)\nforall x (Spell(x, kali) -> Demystify(x, susette))\nforall x (Cragged(x) -> not Demystify(x, josy))\nforall x (Slew(x, simonne) -> Slew(simonne, kali))\n\nnot Spell(josy, josy)\n\nnot Spell(josy, josy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The gus disco the isidore. The gus alkalify the nataline. The gus does not eat the anallese. The gus is referenced. The gus does not see the nataline. The isidore disco the gus. The isidore disco the anallese. The isidore alkalify the anallese. The isidore is unended. The isidore is referenced. The isidore blind the anallese. The nataline alkalify the isidore. The nataline alkalify the anallese. The nataline is bavarian. The nataline blind the anallese. The anallese is seventieth. If something is seventieth then it does not chase the nataline. If something disco the nataline then it alkalify the isidore. If something disco the gus and the gus does not see the nataline then the gus disco the nataline. If something alkalify the isidore then it disco the gus. If the nataline disco the isidore and the anallese does not eat the nataline then the nataline blind the isidore. If something blind the isidore then it alkalify the anallese. If something is bavarian then it does not eat the gus. If something disco the nataline then the nataline disco the isidore. The gus is seventieth.", "logic": "\nDisco(gus, isidore)\nAlkalify(gus, nataline)\nnot Alkalify(gus, anallese)\nReferenced(gus)\nnot Blind(gus, nataline)\nDisco(isidore, gus)\nDisco(isidore, anallese)\nAlkalify(isidore, anallese)\nUnended(isidore)\nReferenced(isidore)\nBlind(isidore, anallese)\nAlkalify(nataline, isidore)\nAlkalify(nataline, anallese)\nBavarian(nataline)\nBlind(nataline, anallese)\nSeventieth(anallese)\nforall x (Seventieth(x) -> not Disco(x, nataline))\nforall x (Disco(x, nataline) -> Alkalify(x, isidore))\nforall x (Disco(x, gus) and not Blind(gus, nataline) -> Disco(gus, nataline))\nforall x (Alkalify(x, isidore) -> Disco(x, gus))\nDisco(nataline, isidore) and not Alkalify(anallese, nataline) -> Blind(nataline, isidore)\nforall x (Blind(x, isidore) -> Alkalify(x, anallese))\nforall x (Bavarian(x) -> not Alkalify(x, gus))\nforall x (Disco(x, nataline) -> Disco(nataline, isidore))\n\nSeventieth(gus)\n\nSeventieth(gus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The willie cachinnate the thurston. The willie brabble the verna. The willie does not eat the madelena. The willie is aramaic. The willie does not see the verna. The thurston cachinnate the willie. The thurston cachinnate the madelena. The thurston brabble the madelena. The thurston is uruguayan. The thurston is aramaic. The thurston preclude the madelena. The verna brabble the thurston. The verna brabble the madelena. The verna is upper. The verna preclude the madelena. The madelena is hysterical. If something is hysterical then it does not chase the verna. If something cachinnate the verna then it brabble the thurston. If something cachinnate the willie and the willie does not see the verna then the willie cachinnate the verna. If something brabble the thurston then it cachinnate the willie. If the verna cachinnate the thurston and the madelena does not eat the verna then the verna preclude the thurston. If something preclude the thurston then it brabble the madelena. If something is upper then it does not eat the willie. If something cachinnate the verna then the verna cachinnate the thurston. The willie is not upper.", "logic": "\nCachinnate(willie, thurston)\nBrabble(willie, verna)\nnot Brabble(willie, madelena)\nAramaic(willie)\nnot Preclude(willie, verna)\nCachinnate(thurston, willie)\nCachinnate(thurston, madelena)\nBrabble(thurston, madelena)\nUruguayan(thurston)\nAramaic(thurston)\nPreclude(thurston, madelena)\nBrabble(verna, thurston)\nBrabble(verna, madelena)\nUpper(verna)\nPreclude(verna, madelena)\nHysterical(madelena)\nforall x (Hysterical(x) -> not Cachinnate(x, verna))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, verna) -> Brabble(x, thurston))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, willie) and not Preclude(willie, verna) -> Cachinnate(willie, verna))\nforall x (Brabble(x, thurston) -> Cachinnate(x, willie))\nCachinnate(verna, thurston) and not Brabble(madelena, verna) -> Preclude(verna, thurston)\nforall x (Preclude(x, thurston) -> Brabble(x, madelena))\nforall x (Upper(x) -> not Brabble(x, willie))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, verna) -> Cachinnate(verna, thurston))\n\nnot Upper(willie)\n\nnot Upper(willie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The meggi laud the redmond. The meggi scupper the marje. The meggi does not eat the geraldo. The meggi is untaped. The meggi does not see the marje. The redmond laud the meggi. The redmond laud the geraldo. The redmond scupper the geraldo. The redmond is scorching. The redmond is untaped. The redmond toenail the geraldo. The marje scupper the redmond. The marje scupper the geraldo. The marje is mycenaean. The marje toenail the geraldo. The geraldo is biogenetic. If something is biogenetic then it does not chase the marje. If something laud the marje then it scupper the redmond. If something laud the meggi and the meggi does not see the marje then the meggi laud the marje. If something scupper the redmond then it laud the meggi. If the marje laud the redmond and the geraldo does not eat the marje then the marje toenail the redmond. If something toenail the redmond then it scupper the geraldo. If something is mycenaean then it does not eat the meggi. If something laud the marje then the marje laud the redmond. The redmond scupper the marje.", "logic": "\nLaud(meggi, redmond)\nScupper(meggi, marje)\nnot Scupper(meggi, geraldo)\nUntaped(meggi)\nnot Toenail(meggi, marje)\nLaud(redmond, meggi)\nLaud(redmond, geraldo)\nScupper(redmond, geraldo)\nScorching(redmond)\nUntaped(redmond)\nToenail(redmond, geraldo)\nScupper(marje, redmond)\nScupper(marje, geraldo)\nMycenaean(marje)\nToenail(marje, geraldo)\nBiogenetic(geraldo)\nforall x (Biogenetic(x) -> not Laud(x, marje))\nforall x (Laud(x, marje) -> Scupper(x, redmond))\nforall x (Laud(x, meggi) and not Toenail(meggi, marje) -> Laud(meggi, marje))\nforall x (Scupper(x, redmond) -> Laud(x, meggi))\nLaud(marje, redmond) and not Scupper(geraldo, marje) -> Toenail(marje, redmond)\nforall x (Toenail(x, redmond) -> Scupper(x, geraldo))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) -> not Scupper(x, meggi))\nforall x (Laud(x, marje) -> Laud(marje, redmond))\n\nScupper(redmond, marje)\n\nScupper(redmond, marje) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-866"} {"premises": "The judy totalize the thaddeus. The judy totalize the zackariah. The judy is somalian. The judy is primitive. The judy deprave the zackariah. The thaddeus totalize the judy. The thaddeus is unwished. The thaddeus deprave the judy. The zackariah totalize the judy. The zackariah deprave the judy. If the judy is sororal then the judy intensify the thaddeus. If the zackariah totalize the judy then the judy is gooselike. If the zackariah deprave the judy then the judy deprave the thaddeus. If someone deprave the zackariah then the zackariah is unwished. If the thaddeus intensify the judy and the thaddeus is sororal then the thaddeus intensify the zackariah. If someone intensify the judy then they are gooselike. If the zackariah totalize the judy and the zackariah deprave the judy then the zackariah intensify the judy. If someone totalize the thaddeus and the thaddeus is gooselike then they are primitive. The thaddeus deprave the judy.", "logic": "\nTotalize(judy, thaddeus)\nTotalize(judy, zackariah)\nSomalian(judy)\nPrimitive(judy)\nDeprave(judy, zackariah)\nTotalize(thaddeus, judy)\nUnwished(thaddeus)\nDeprave(thaddeus, judy)\nTotalize(zackariah, judy)\nDeprave(zackariah, judy)\nSororal(judy) -> Intensify(judy, thaddeus)\nTotalize(zackariah, judy) -> Gooselike(judy)\nDeprave(zackariah, judy) -> Deprave(judy, thaddeus)\nforall x (Deprave(x, zackariah) -> Unwished(zackariah))\nIntensify(thaddeus, judy) and Sororal(thaddeus) -> Intensify(thaddeus, zackariah)\nforall x (Intensify(x, judy) -> Gooselike(x))\nTotalize(zackariah, judy) and Deprave(zackariah, judy) -> Intensify(zackariah, judy)\nforall x (Totalize(x, thaddeus) and Gooselike(thaddeus) -> Primitive(x))\n\nDeprave(thaddeus, judy)\n\ntherefore Deprave(thaddeus, judy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1636"} {"premises": "The kate encrimson the durand. The kate encrimson the kathy. The kate is brittle. The kate is unwarmed. The kate straw the kathy. The durand encrimson the kate. The durand is sickening. The durand straw the kate. The kathy encrimson the kate. The kathy straw the kate. If the kate is stifled then the kate mizzle the durand. If the kathy encrimson the kate then the kate is toxic. If the kathy straw the kate then the kate straw the durand. If someone straw the kathy then the kathy is sickening. If the durand mizzle the kate and the durand is stifled then the durand mizzle the kathy. If someone mizzle the kate then they are toxic. If the kathy encrimson the kate and the kathy straw the kate then the kathy mizzle the kate. If someone encrimson the durand and the durand is toxic then they are unwarmed. The kate does not visit the kathy.", "logic": "\nEncrimson(kate, durand)\nEncrimson(kate, kathy)\nBrittle(kate)\nUnwarmed(kate)\nStraw(kate, kathy)\nEncrimson(durand, kate)\nSickening(durand)\nStraw(durand, kate)\nEncrimson(kathy, kate)\nStraw(kathy, kate)\nStifled(kate) -> Mizzle(kate, durand)\nEncrimson(kathy, kate) -> Toxic(kate)\nStraw(kathy, kate) -> Straw(kate, durand)\nforall x (Straw(x, kathy) -> Sickening(kathy))\nMizzle(durand, kate) and Stifled(durand) -> Mizzle(durand, kathy)\nforall x (Mizzle(x, kate) -> Toxic(x))\nEncrimson(kathy, kate) and Straw(kathy, kate) -> Mizzle(kathy, kate)\nforall x (Encrimson(x, durand) and Toxic(durand) -> Unwarmed(x))\n\nnot Straw(kate, kathy)\n\ntherefore Straw(kate, kathy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1636"} {"premises": "The hilde flaunt the neila. The hilde flaunt the lula. The hilde is naiant. The hilde is violative. The hilde arrest the lula. The neila flaunt the hilde. The neila is oblivious. The neila arrest the hilde. The lula flaunt the hilde. The lula arrest the hilde. If the hilde is vaccinated then the hilde appear the neila. If the lula flaunt the hilde then the hilde is repressive. If the lula arrest the hilde then the hilde arrest the neila. If someone arrest the lula then the lula is oblivious. If the neila appear the hilde and the neila is vaccinated then the neila appear the lula. If someone appear the hilde then they are repressive. If the lula flaunt the hilde and the lula arrest the hilde then the lula appear the hilde. If someone flaunt the neila and the neila is repressive then they are violative. The lula is not violative.", "logic": "\nFlaunt(hilde, neila)\nFlaunt(hilde, lula)\nNaiant(hilde)\nViolative(hilde)\nArrest(hilde, lula)\nFlaunt(neila, hilde)\nOblivious(neila)\nArrest(neila, hilde)\nFlaunt(lula, hilde)\nArrest(lula, hilde)\nVaccinated(hilde) -> Appear(hilde, neila)\nFlaunt(lula, hilde) -> Repressive(hilde)\nArrest(lula, hilde) -> Arrest(hilde, neila)\nforall x (Arrest(x, lula) -> Oblivious(lula))\nAppear(neila, hilde) and Vaccinated(neila) -> Appear(neila, lula)\nforall x (Appear(x, hilde) -> Repressive(x))\nFlaunt(lula, hilde) and Arrest(lula, hilde) -> Appear(lula, hilde)\nforall x (Flaunt(x, neila) and Repressive(neila) -> Violative(x))\n\nnot Violative(lula)\n\nforall x (Flaunt(x, neila) and Repressive(neila) -> Violative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1636"} {"premises": "The cele prime the reiko. The cele prime the klarrisa. The cele is fusible. The cele is crappy. The cele solvate the klarrisa. The reiko prime the cele. The reiko is thankful. The reiko solvate the cele. The klarrisa prime the cele. The klarrisa solvate the cele. If the cele is duncish then the cele contuse the reiko. If the klarrisa prime the cele then the cele is neat. If the klarrisa solvate the cele then the cele solvate the reiko. If someone solvate the klarrisa then the klarrisa is thankful. If the reiko contuse the cele and the reiko is duncish then the reiko contuse the klarrisa. If someone contuse the cele then they are neat. If the klarrisa prime the cele and the klarrisa solvate the cele then the klarrisa contuse the cele. If someone prime the reiko and the reiko is neat then they are crappy. The reiko solvate the reiko.", "logic": "\nPrime(cele, reiko)\nPrime(cele, klarrisa)\nFusible(cele)\nCrappy(cele)\nSolvate(cele, klarrisa)\nPrime(reiko, cele)\nThankful(reiko)\nSolvate(reiko, cele)\nPrime(klarrisa, cele)\nSolvate(klarrisa, cele)\nDuncish(cele) -> Contuse(cele, reiko)\nPrime(klarrisa, cele) -> Neat(cele)\nSolvate(klarrisa, cele) -> Solvate(cele, reiko)\nforall x (Solvate(x, klarrisa) -> Thankful(klarrisa))\nContuse(reiko, cele) and Duncish(reiko) -> Contuse(reiko, klarrisa)\nforall x (Contuse(x, cele) -> Neat(x))\nPrime(klarrisa, cele) and Solvate(klarrisa, cele) -> Contuse(klarrisa, cele)\nforall x (Prime(x, reiko) and Neat(reiko) -> Crappy(x))\n\nSolvate(reiko, reiko)\n\nSolvate(reiko, reiko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1636"} {"premises": "Orrin is allargando. Valentine is undressed. Tawsha is lesser. Alexandra is appraising. All wizened things are lesser. If something is undressed and cooked then it is lesser. Quiet things are dandy. Orrin is allargando.", "logic": "\nAllargando(orrin)\nUndressed(valentine)\nLesser(tawsha)\nAppraising(alexandra)\nforall x (Wizened(x) -> Lesser(x))\nforall x (Undressed(x) and Cooked(x) -> Lesser(x))\nforall x (Allargando(x) -> Dandy(x))\n\nAllargando(orrin)\n\ntherefore Allargando(orrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Corabel is unexampled. Connie is yearlong. Blinny is shortish. Bernette is exceeding. All deckled things are shortish. If something is yearlong and uniovulate then it is shortish. Quiet things are demeaning. Connie is not yearlong.", "logic": "\nUnexampled(corabel)\nYearlong(connie)\nShortish(blinny)\nExceeding(bernette)\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Shortish(x))\nforall x (Yearlong(x) and Uniovulate(x) -> Shortish(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Demeaning(x))\n\nnot Yearlong(connie)\n\ntherefore Yearlong(connie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Phineas is forte. Rosita is nonracist. Ervin is staccato. Giles is delicate. All abeyant things are staccato. If something is nonracist and schmalzy then it is staccato. Quiet things are acoustic. Phineas is acoustic.", "logic": "\nForte(phineas)\nNonracist(rosita)\nStaccato(ervin)\nDelicate(giles)\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Staccato(x))\nforall x (Nonracist(x) and Schmalzy(x) -> Staccato(x))\nforall x (Forte(x) -> Acoustic(x))\n\nAcoustic(phineas)\n\nForte(phineas) and forall x (Forte(x) -> Acoustic(x)) -> therefore Acoustic(phineas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Paige is asthenic. Lilyan is parisian. Merola is calcuttan. Phillis is recreant. All butcherly things are calcuttan. If something is parisian and dateable then it is calcuttan. Quiet things are dominating. Paige is not dominating.", "logic": "\nAsthenic(paige)\nParisian(lilyan)\nCalcuttan(merola)\nRecreant(phillis)\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Parisian(x) and Dateable(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Dominating(x))\n\nnot Dominating(paige)\n\nAsthenic(paige) and forall x (Asthenic(x) -> Dominating(x)) -> therefore Dominating(paige)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Wendell is naughty. Lorain is sixpenny. Lucinda is copacetic. Lyndell is crisp. All pillaged things are copacetic. If something is sixpenny and sudanese then it is copacetic. Quiet things are exonerated. Lucinda is not exonerated.", "logic": "\nNaughty(wendell)\nSixpenny(lorain)\nCopacetic(lucinda)\nCrisp(lyndell)\nforall x (Pillaged(x) -> Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Sixpenny(x) and Sudanese(x) -> Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Naughty(x) -> Exonerated(x))\n\nnot Exonerated(lucinda)\n\nforall x (Naughty(x) -> Exonerated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Wendy is nonsexual. Agustin is rhizoidal. Philomena is protective. Yoshi is smoldering. All outmost things are protective. If something is rhizoidal and appositive then it is protective. Quiet things are unattached. Yoshi is unattached.", "logic": "\nNonsexual(wendy)\nRhizoidal(agustin)\nProtective(philomena)\nSmoldering(yoshi)\nforall x (Outmost(x) -> Protective(x))\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) and Appositive(x) -> Protective(x))\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) -> Unattached(x))\n\nUnattached(yoshi)\n\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) -> Unattached(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Oreste is astringent. Gustavo is monarchal. Lyndsay is baptismal. Herrick is corrosive. All hormonal things are baptismal. If something is monarchal and dangerous then it is baptismal. Quiet things are unsalable. Gustavo is not astringent.", "logic": "\nAstringent(oreste)\nMonarchal(gustavo)\nBaptismal(lyndsay)\nCorrosive(herrick)\nforall x (Hormonal(x) -> Baptismal(x))\nforall x (Monarchal(x) and Dangerous(x) -> Baptismal(x))\nforall x (Astringent(x) -> Unsalable(x))\n\nnot Astringent(gustavo)\n\nnot Astringent(gustavo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Magnum is nagging. Avrit is sluggish. Neala is agrarian. Roddy is gummy. All unhatched things are agrarian. If something is sluggish and classy then it is agrarian. Quiet things are impartial. Roddy is classy.", "logic": "\nNagging(magnum)\nSluggish(avrit)\nAgrarian(neala)\nGummy(roddy)\nforall x (Unhatched(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Sluggish(x) and Classy(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Impartial(x))\n\nClassy(roddy)\n\nClassy(roddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1058"} {"premises": "Klarika is unbearable. Harri is unbearable. All prismatic, overactive people are not deniable. All prismatic, doleful people are deniable. Young people are prismatic. Red people are prismatic. Quiet people are not appareled. If someone is doleful and not deniable then they are not unbearable. Klarika is unbearable.", "logic": "\nUnbearable(klarika)\nUnbearable(harri)\nforall x (Prismatic(x) and Overactive(x) -> not Deniable(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) and Doleful(x) -> Deniable(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Unbearable(x) -> not Appareled(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) and not Deniable(x) -> not Unbearable(x))\n\nUnbearable(klarika)\n\ntherefore Unbearable(klarika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4793"} {"premises": "Auroora is risky. Glory is risky. All scrupulous, endurable people are not lanky. All scrupulous, unattached people are lanky. Young people are scrupulous. Red people are scrupulous. Quiet people are not absolutist. If someone is unattached and not lanky then they are not risky. Auroora is not risky.", "logic": "\nRisky(auroora)\nRisky(glory)\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Endurable(x) -> not Lanky(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Unattached(x) -> Lanky(x))\nforall x (Lanky(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Endurable(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Risky(x) -> not Absolutist(x))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and not Lanky(x) -> not Risky(x))\n\nnot Risky(auroora)\n\ntherefore Risky(auroora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4793"} {"premises": "Hall is resolved. Damian is resolved. All narrow, cetacean people are not zymolytic. All narrow, jingling people are zymolytic. Young people are narrow. Red people are narrow. Quiet people are not working. If someone is jingling and not zymolytic then they are not resolved. Damian is not zymolytic.", "logic": "\nResolved(hall)\nResolved(damian)\nforall x (Narrow(x) and Cetacean(x) -> not Zymolytic(x))\nforall x (Narrow(x) and Jingling(x) -> Zymolytic(x))\nforall x (Zymolytic(x) -> Narrow(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) -> Narrow(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> not Working(x))\nforall x (Jingling(x) and not Zymolytic(x) -> not Resolved(x))\n\nnot Zymolytic(damian)\n\nforall x (Narrow(x) and Jingling(x) -> Zymolytic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4793"} {"premises": "Bettine is avowed. Godart is avowed. All baffled, minatory people are not plumaged. All baffled, sparing people are plumaged. Young people are baffled. Red people are baffled. Quiet people are not retro. If someone is sparing and not plumaged then they are not avowed. Godart is smart.", "logic": "\nAvowed(bettine)\nAvowed(godart)\nforall x (Baffled(x) and Minatory(x) -> not Plumaged(x))\nforall x (Baffled(x) and Sparing(x) -> Plumaged(x))\nforall x (Plumaged(x) -> Baffled(x))\nforall x (Minatory(x) -> Baffled(x))\nforall x (Avowed(x) -> not Retro(x))\nforall x (Sparing(x) and not Plumaged(x) -> not Avowed(x))\n\nSmart(godart)\n\nSmart(godart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4793"} {"premises": "Sally is not stimulant. Sally is quickset. Sally is nosy. All unhinged things are notorious. If something is nosy then it is unhinged. Nice things are putrid. Sally is not stimulant.", "logic": "\nnot Stimulant(sally)\nQuickset(sally)\nNosy(sally)\nforall x (Unhinged(x) -> Notorious(x))\nforall x (Nosy(x) -> Unhinged(x))\nforall x (Notorious(x) -> Putrid(x))\n\nnot Stimulant(sally)\n\ntherefore not Stimulant(sally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Valencia is not bigeminal. Valencia is flameproof. Valencia is unseeing. All russet things are immunised. If something is unseeing then it is russet. Nice things are coplanar. Valencia is not unseeing.", "logic": "\nnot Bigeminal(valencia)\nFlameproof(valencia)\nUnseeing(valencia)\nforall x (Russet(x) -> Immunised(x))\nforall x (Unseeing(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Immunised(x) -> Coplanar(x))\n\nnot Unseeing(valencia)\n\ntherefore Unseeing(valencia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Vivian is not soapy. Vivian is webbed. Vivian is lipotropic. All unbound things are unsown. If something is lipotropic then it is unbound. Nice things are dental. Vivian is unbound.", "logic": "\nnot Soapy(vivian)\nWebbed(vivian)\nLipotropic(vivian)\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Unsown(x))\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) -> Unbound(x))\nforall x (Unsown(x) -> Dental(x))\n\nUnbound(vivian)\n\nLipotropic(vivian) and forall x (Lipotropic(x) -> Unbound(x)) -> therefore Unbound(vivian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Aphrodite is not brumous. Aphrodite is underfed. Aphrodite is dowerless. All senatorial things are tributary. If something is dowerless then it is senatorial. Nice things are tame. Aphrodite is not senatorial.", "logic": "\nnot Brumous(aphrodite)\nUnderfed(aphrodite)\nDowerless(aphrodite)\nforall x (Senatorial(x) -> Tributary(x))\nforall x (Dowerless(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) -> Tame(x))\n\nnot Senatorial(aphrodite)\n\nDowerless(aphrodite) and forall x (Dowerless(x) -> Senatorial(x)) -> therefore Senatorial(aphrodite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Denys is not scraggly. Denys is express. Denys is ghanian. All tragical things are blackened. If something is ghanian then it is tragical. Nice things are xxxviii. Denys is blackened.", "logic": "\nnot Scraggly(denys)\nExpress(denys)\nGhanian(denys)\nforall x (Tragical(x) -> Blackened(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Tragical(x))\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Xxxviii(x))\n\nBlackened(denys)\n\nGhanian(denys) and forall x (Ghanian(x) -> Tragical(x)) -> therefore Tragical(denys) Tragical(denys) and forall x (Tragical(x) -> Blackened(x)) -> therefore Blackened(denys)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Dawson is not magnetic. Dawson is gossamer. Dawson is mozambican. All wired things are commercial. If something is mozambican then it is wired. Nice things are verbatim. Dawson is not commercial.", "logic": "\nnot Magnetic(dawson)\nGossamer(dawson)\nMozambican(dawson)\nforall x (Wired(x) -> Commercial(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> Wired(x))\nforall x (Commercial(x) -> Verbatim(x))\n\nnot Commercial(dawson)\n\nMozambican(dawson) and forall x (Mozambican(x) -> Wired(x)) -> therefore Wired(dawson) Wired(dawson) and forall x (Wired(x) -> Commercial(x)) -> therefore Commercial(dawson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Sayre is not abashed. Sayre is frivolous. Sayre is brisant. All slanting things are squashy. If something is brisant then it is slanting. Nice things are ulnar. Sayre is ulnar.", "logic": "\nnot Abashed(sayre)\nFrivolous(sayre)\nBrisant(sayre)\nforall x (Slanting(x) -> Squashy(x))\nforall x (Brisant(x) -> Slanting(x))\nforall x (Squashy(x) -> Ulnar(x))\n\nUlnar(sayre)\n\nBrisant(sayre) and forall x (Brisant(x) -> Slanting(x)) -> therefore Slanting(sayre) Slanting(sayre) and forall x (Slanting(x) -> Squashy(x)) -> therefore Squashy(sayre) Squashy(sayre) and forall x (Squashy(x) -> Ulnar(x)) -> therefore Ulnar(sayre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Caleb is not fleecy. Caleb is docile. Caleb is amber. All damnatory things are knowing. If something is amber then it is damnatory. Nice things are nebulous. Caleb is not nebulous.", "logic": "\nnot Fleecy(caleb)\nDocile(caleb)\nAmber(caleb)\nforall x (Damnatory(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Amber(x) -> Damnatory(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Nebulous(x))\n\nnot Nebulous(caleb)\n\nAmber(caleb) and forall x (Amber(x) -> Damnatory(x)) -> therefore Damnatory(caleb) Damnatory(caleb) and forall x (Damnatory(x) -> Knowing(x)) -> therefore Knowing(caleb) Knowing(caleb) and forall x (Knowing(x) -> Nebulous(x)) -> therefore Nebulous(caleb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-984"} {"premises": "Amalita is alimental. Amalita is futureless. Amalita is chelate. Amalita is reverend. Amalita is sounding. Amalita is satirical. Shannon is futureless. Shannon is vagile. Shannon is chelate. Shannon is reverend. Shannon is sounding. Shannon is satirical. Cold things are reverend. If something is reverend and futureless then it is alimental. If something is futureless and chelate then it is alimental. If Shannon is vagile and Shannon is not alimental then Shannon is satirical. If something is vagile and not reverend then it is not satirical. If Amalita is not futureless and Amalita is not satirical then Amalita is sounding. Shannon is chelate.", "logic": "\nAlimental(amalita)\nFutureless(amalita)\nChelate(amalita)\nReverend(amalita)\nSounding(amalita)\nSatirical(amalita)\nFutureless(shannon)\nVagile(shannon)\nChelate(shannon)\nReverend(shannon)\nSounding(shannon)\nSatirical(shannon)\nforall x (Alimental(x) -> Reverend(x))\nforall x (Reverend(x) and Futureless(x) -> Alimental(x))\nforall x (Futureless(x) and Chelate(x) -> Alimental(x))\nVagile(shannon) and not Alimental(shannon) -> Satirical(shannon)\nforall x (Vagile(x) and not Reverend(x) -> not Satirical(x))\nnot Futureless(amalita) and not Satirical(amalita) -> Sounding(amalita)\n\nChelate(shannon)\n\ntherefore Chelate(shannon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "Welbie is inertial. Welbie is torn. Welbie is unwed. Welbie is polar. Welbie is biaxate. Welbie is sessile. Stefano is torn. Stefano is envisioned. Stefano is unwed. Stefano is polar. Stefano is biaxate. Stefano is sessile. Cold things are polar. If something is polar and torn then it is inertial. If something is torn and unwed then it is inertial. If Stefano is envisioned and Stefano is not inertial then Stefano is sessile. If something is envisioned and not polar then it is not sessile. If Welbie is not torn and Welbie is not sessile then Welbie is biaxate. Welbie is not inertial.", "logic": "\nInertial(welbie)\nTorn(welbie)\nUnwed(welbie)\nPolar(welbie)\nBiaxate(welbie)\nSessile(welbie)\nTorn(stefano)\nEnvisioned(stefano)\nUnwed(stefano)\nPolar(stefano)\nBiaxate(stefano)\nSessile(stefano)\nforall x (Inertial(x) -> Polar(x))\nforall x (Polar(x) and Torn(x) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Torn(x) and Unwed(x) -> Inertial(x))\nEnvisioned(stefano) and not Inertial(stefano) -> Sessile(stefano)\nforall x (Envisioned(x) and not Polar(x) -> not Sessile(x))\nnot Torn(welbie) and not Sessile(welbie) -> Biaxate(welbie)\n\nnot Inertial(welbie)\n\ntherefore Inertial(welbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "Allyson is unfattened. Allyson is bimotored. Allyson is saclike. Allyson is scrawny. Allyson is homiletic. Allyson is scotch. Charmaine is bimotored. Charmaine is effaceable. Charmaine is saclike. Charmaine is scrawny. Charmaine is homiletic. Charmaine is scotch. Cold things are scrawny. If something is scrawny and bimotored then it is unfattened. If something is bimotored and saclike then it is unfattened. If Charmaine is effaceable and Charmaine is not unfattened then Charmaine is scotch. If something is effaceable and not scrawny then it is not scotch. If Allyson is not bimotored and Allyson is not scotch then Allyson is homiletic. Charmaine is unfattened.", "logic": "\nUnfattened(allyson)\nBimotored(allyson)\nSaclike(allyson)\nScrawny(allyson)\nHomiletic(allyson)\nScotch(allyson)\nBimotored(charmaine)\nEffaceable(charmaine)\nSaclike(charmaine)\nScrawny(charmaine)\nHomiletic(charmaine)\nScotch(charmaine)\nforall x (Unfattened(x) -> Scrawny(x))\nforall x (Scrawny(x) and Bimotored(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nforall x (Bimotored(x) and Saclike(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nEffaceable(charmaine) and not Unfattened(charmaine) -> Scotch(charmaine)\nforall x (Effaceable(x) and not Scrawny(x) -> not Scotch(x))\nnot Bimotored(allyson) and not Scotch(allyson) -> Homiletic(allyson)\n\nUnfattened(charmaine)\n\nScrawny(charmaine) and Bimotored(charmaine) and forall x (Scrawny(x) and Bimotored(x) -> Unfattened(x)) -> therefore Unfattened(charmaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "Locke is unneurotic. Locke is cloying. Locke is uncleared. Locke is ignitible. Locke is asinine. Locke is profitless. Thornton is cloying. Thornton is undutiful. Thornton is uncleared. Thornton is ignitible. Thornton is asinine. Thornton is profitless. Cold things are ignitible. If something is ignitible and cloying then it is unneurotic. If something is cloying and uncleared then it is unneurotic. If Thornton is undutiful and Thornton is not unneurotic then Thornton is profitless. If something is undutiful and not ignitible then it is not profitless. If Locke is not cloying and Locke is not profitless then Locke is asinine. Thornton is not unneurotic.", "logic": "\nUnneurotic(locke)\nCloying(locke)\nUncleared(locke)\nIgnitible(locke)\nAsinine(locke)\nProfitless(locke)\nCloying(thornton)\nUndutiful(thornton)\nUncleared(thornton)\nIgnitible(thornton)\nAsinine(thornton)\nProfitless(thornton)\nforall x (Unneurotic(x) -> Ignitible(x))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Cloying(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Cloying(x) and Uncleared(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nUndutiful(thornton) and not Unneurotic(thornton) -> Profitless(thornton)\nforall x (Undutiful(x) and not Ignitible(x) -> not Profitless(x))\nnot Cloying(locke) and not Profitless(locke) -> Asinine(locke)\n\nnot Unneurotic(thornton)\n\nIgnitible(thornton) and Cloying(thornton) and forall x (Ignitible(x) and Cloying(x) -> Unneurotic(x)) -> therefore Unneurotic(thornton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The denise is irrelevant. The denise does not need the plato. The denise does not visit the glennis. The glennis is archaistic. The plato is horrific. The plato accustom the denise. The plato stagnate the denise. If someone accustom the denise then they do not like the glennis. If someone pound the glennis and they need the glennis then the glennis accustom the denise. If someone pound the denise and the denise stagnate the plato then the denise is irrelevant. If someone stagnate the glennis then the glennis is bulbaceous. If the glennis is irrelevant and the glennis accustom the denise then the denise pound the plato. If someone stagnate the denise and they do not like the glennis then the denise is bulbaceous. The glennis is archaistic.", "logic": "\nIrrelevant(denise)\nnot Stagnate(denise, plato)\nnot Pound(denise, glennis)\nArchaistic(glennis)\nHorrific(plato)\nAccustom(plato, denise)\nStagnate(plato, denise)\nforall x (Accustom(x, denise) -> not Accustom(x, glennis))\nforall x (Pound(x, glennis) and Stagnate(x, glennis) -> Accustom(glennis, denise))\nforall x (Pound(x, denise) and Stagnate(denise, plato) -> Irrelevant(denise))\nforall x (Stagnate(x, glennis) -> Bulbaceous(glennis))\nIrrelevant(glennis) and Accustom(glennis, denise) -> Pound(denise, plato)\nforall x (Stagnate(x, denise) and not Accustom(x, glennis) -> Bulbaceous(denise))\n\nArchaistic(glennis)\n\ntherefore Archaistic(glennis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The ellwood is backhand. The ellwood does not need the bruno. The ellwood does not visit the hartley. The hartley is epicene. The bruno is shelflike. The bruno forgive the ellwood. The bruno promise the ellwood. If someone forgive the ellwood then they do not like the hartley. If someone intend the hartley and they need the hartley then the hartley forgive the ellwood. If someone intend the ellwood and the ellwood promise the bruno then the ellwood is backhand. If someone promise the hartley then the hartley is sedentary. If the hartley is backhand and the hartley forgive the ellwood then the ellwood intend the bruno. If someone promise the ellwood and they do not like the hartley then the ellwood is sedentary. The bruno does not like the ellwood.", "logic": "\nBackhand(ellwood)\nnot Promise(ellwood, bruno)\nnot Intend(ellwood, hartley)\nEpicene(hartley)\nShelflike(bruno)\nForgive(bruno, ellwood)\nPromise(bruno, ellwood)\nforall x (Forgive(x, ellwood) -> not Forgive(x, hartley))\nforall x (Intend(x, hartley) and Promise(x, hartley) -> Forgive(hartley, ellwood))\nforall x (Intend(x, ellwood) and Promise(ellwood, bruno) -> Backhand(ellwood))\nforall x (Promise(x, hartley) -> Sedentary(hartley))\nBackhand(hartley) and Forgive(hartley, ellwood) -> Intend(ellwood, bruno)\nforall x (Promise(x, ellwood) and not Forgive(x, hartley) -> Sedentary(ellwood))\n\nnot Forgive(bruno, ellwood)\n\ntherefore Forgive(bruno, ellwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The abigale is climbable. The abigale does not need the dan. The abigale does not visit the marmaduke. The marmaduke is stabilized. The dan is animating. The dan parent the abigale. The dan bomb the abigale. If someone parent the abigale then they do not like the marmaduke. If someone prime the marmaduke and they need the marmaduke then the marmaduke parent the abigale. If someone prime the abigale and the abigale bomb the dan then the abigale is climbable. If someone bomb the marmaduke then the marmaduke is numerical. If the marmaduke is climbable and the marmaduke parent the abigale then the abigale prime the dan. If someone bomb the abigale and they do not like the marmaduke then the abigale is numerical. The dan does not like the marmaduke.", "logic": "\nClimbable(abigale)\nnot Bomb(abigale, dan)\nnot Prime(abigale, marmaduke)\nStabilized(marmaduke)\nAnimating(dan)\nParent(dan, abigale)\nBomb(dan, abigale)\nforall x (Parent(x, abigale) -> not Parent(x, marmaduke))\nforall x (Prime(x, marmaduke) and Bomb(x, marmaduke) -> Parent(marmaduke, abigale))\nforall x (Prime(x, abigale) and Bomb(abigale, dan) -> Climbable(abigale))\nforall x (Bomb(x, marmaduke) -> Numerical(marmaduke))\nClimbable(marmaduke) and Parent(marmaduke, abigale) -> Prime(abigale, dan)\nforall x (Bomb(x, abigale) and not Parent(x, marmaduke) -> Numerical(abigale))\n\nnot Parent(dan, marmaduke)\n\nParent(dan, abigale) and forall x (Parent(x, abigale) -> not Parent(x, marmaduke)) -> therefore not Parent(dan, marmaduke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The gilbert is addictive. The gilbert does not need the manuel. The gilbert does not visit the avraham. The avraham is clastic. The manuel is enumerable. The manuel seesaw the gilbert. The manuel gape the gilbert. If someone seesaw the gilbert then they do not like the avraham. If someone denounce the avraham and they need the avraham then the avraham seesaw the gilbert. If someone denounce the gilbert and the gilbert gape the manuel then the gilbert is addictive. If someone gape the avraham then the avraham is ample. If the avraham is addictive and the avraham seesaw the gilbert then the gilbert denounce the manuel. If someone gape the gilbert and they do not like the avraham then the gilbert is ample. The manuel seesaw the avraham.", "logic": "\nAddictive(gilbert)\nnot Gape(gilbert, manuel)\nnot Denounce(gilbert, avraham)\nClastic(avraham)\nEnumerable(manuel)\nSeesaw(manuel, gilbert)\nGape(manuel, gilbert)\nforall x (Seesaw(x, gilbert) -> not Seesaw(x, avraham))\nforall x (Denounce(x, avraham) and Gape(x, avraham) -> Seesaw(avraham, gilbert))\nforall x (Denounce(x, gilbert) and Gape(gilbert, manuel) -> Addictive(gilbert))\nforall x (Gape(x, avraham) -> Ample(avraham))\nAddictive(avraham) and Seesaw(avraham, gilbert) -> Denounce(gilbert, manuel)\nforall x (Gape(x, gilbert) and not Seesaw(x, avraham) -> Ample(gilbert))\n\nSeesaw(manuel, avraham)\n\nSeesaw(manuel, gilbert) and forall x (Seesaw(x, gilbert) -> not Seesaw(x, avraham)) -> therefore not Seesaw(manuel, avraham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The tull is asocial. The tull does not need the marie. The tull does not visit the zechariah. The zechariah is begotten. The marie is antennal. The marie crown the tull. The marie elocute the tull. If someone crown the tull then they do not like the zechariah. If someone forestall the zechariah and they need the zechariah then the zechariah crown the tull. If someone forestall the tull and the tull elocute the marie then the tull is asocial. If someone elocute the zechariah then the zechariah is chicken. If the zechariah is asocial and the zechariah crown the tull then the tull forestall the marie. If someone elocute the tull and they do not like the zechariah then the tull is chicken. The tull is chicken.", "logic": "\nAsocial(tull)\nnot Elocute(tull, marie)\nnot Forestall(tull, zechariah)\nBegotten(zechariah)\nAntennal(marie)\nCrown(marie, tull)\nElocute(marie, tull)\nforall x (Crown(x, tull) -> not Crown(x, zechariah))\nforall x (Forestall(x, zechariah) and Elocute(x, zechariah) -> Crown(zechariah, tull))\nforall x (Forestall(x, tull) and Elocute(tull, marie) -> Asocial(tull))\nforall x (Elocute(x, zechariah) -> Chicken(zechariah))\nAsocial(zechariah) and Crown(zechariah, tull) -> Forestall(tull, marie)\nforall x (Elocute(x, tull) and not Crown(x, zechariah) -> Chicken(tull))\n\nChicken(tull)\n\nCrown(marie, tull) and forall x (Crown(x, tull) -> not Crown(x, zechariah)) -> therefore not Crown(marie, zechariah) Elocute(marie, tull) and not Crown(marie, zechariah) and forall x (Elocute(x, tull) and not Crown(x, zechariah) -> Chicken(tull)) -> therefore Chicken(tull)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The vladamir is tractable. The vladamir does not need the theodosia. The vladamir does not visit the jolene. The jolene is desecrated. The theodosia is annulated. The theodosia jerk the vladamir. The theodosia blitz the vladamir. If someone jerk the vladamir then they do not like the jolene. If someone fluster the jolene and they need the jolene then the jolene jerk the vladamir. If someone fluster the vladamir and the vladamir blitz the theodosia then the vladamir is tractable. If someone blitz the jolene then the jolene is terrene. If the jolene is tractable and the jolene jerk the vladamir then the vladamir fluster the theodosia. If someone blitz the vladamir and they do not like the jolene then the vladamir is terrene. The vladamir is not terrene.", "logic": "\nTractable(vladamir)\nnot Blitz(vladamir, theodosia)\nnot Fluster(vladamir, jolene)\nDesecrated(jolene)\nAnnulated(theodosia)\nJerk(theodosia, vladamir)\nBlitz(theodosia, vladamir)\nforall x (Jerk(x, vladamir) -> not Jerk(x, jolene))\nforall x (Fluster(x, jolene) and Blitz(x, jolene) -> Jerk(jolene, vladamir))\nforall x (Fluster(x, vladamir) and Blitz(vladamir, theodosia) -> Tractable(vladamir))\nforall x (Blitz(x, jolene) -> Terrene(jolene))\nTractable(jolene) and Jerk(jolene, vladamir) -> Fluster(vladamir, theodosia)\nforall x (Blitz(x, vladamir) and not Jerk(x, jolene) -> Terrene(vladamir))\n\nnot Terrene(vladamir)\n\nJerk(theodosia, vladamir) and forall x (Jerk(x, vladamir) -> not Jerk(x, jolene)) -> therefore not Jerk(theodosia, jolene) Blitz(theodosia, vladamir) and not Jerk(theodosia, jolene) and forall x (Blitz(x, vladamir) and not Jerk(x, jolene) -> Terrene(vladamir)) -> therefore Terrene(vladamir)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The bryana is zany. The bryana does not need the kiersten. The bryana does not visit the milka. The milka is debased. The kiersten is oviparous. The kiersten labour the bryana. The kiersten adapt the bryana. If someone labour the bryana then they do not like the milka. If someone disjoint the milka and they need the milka then the milka labour the bryana. If someone disjoint the bryana and the bryana adapt the kiersten then the bryana is zany. If someone adapt the milka then the milka is definable. If the milka is zany and the milka labour the bryana then the bryana disjoint the kiersten. If someone adapt the bryana and they do not like the milka then the bryana is definable. The milka does not like the bryana.", "logic": "\nZany(bryana)\nnot Adapt(bryana, kiersten)\nnot Disjoint(bryana, milka)\nDebased(milka)\nOviparous(kiersten)\nLabour(kiersten, bryana)\nAdapt(kiersten, bryana)\nforall x (Labour(x, bryana) -> not Labour(x, milka))\nforall x (Disjoint(x, milka) and Adapt(x, milka) -> Labour(milka, bryana))\nforall x (Disjoint(x, bryana) and Adapt(bryana, kiersten) -> Zany(bryana))\nforall x (Adapt(x, milka) -> Definable(milka))\nZany(milka) and Labour(milka, bryana) -> Disjoint(bryana, kiersten)\nforall x (Adapt(x, bryana) and not Labour(x, milka) -> Definable(bryana))\n\nnot Labour(milka, bryana)\n\nforall x (Disjoint(x, milka) and Adapt(x, milka) -> Labour(milka, bryana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The conrad is couth. The conrad does not need the margaret. The conrad does not visit the roscoe. The roscoe is biological. The margaret is echt. The margaret depone the conrad. The margaret chain the conrad. If someone depone the conrad then they do not like the roscoe. If someone drift the roscoe and they need the roscoe then the roscoe depone the conrad. If someone drift the conrad and the conrad chain the margaret then the conrad is couth. If someone chain the roscoe then the roscoe is linelike. If the roscoe is couth and the roscoe depone the conrad then the conrad drift the margaret. If someone chain the conrad and they do not like the roscoe then the conrad is linelike. The conrad drift the margaret.", "logic": "\nCouth(conrad)\nnot Chain(conrad, margaret)\nnot Drift(conrad, roscoe)\nBiological(roscoe)\nEcht(margaret)\nDepone(margaret, conrad)\nChain(margaret, conrad)\nforall x (Depone(x, conrad) -> not Depone(x, roscoe))\nforall x (Drift(x, roscoe) and Chain(x, roscoe) -> Depone(roscoe, conrad))\nforall x (Drift(x, conrad) and Chain(conrad, margaret) -> Couth(conrad))\nforall x (Chain(x, roscoe) -> Linelike(roscoe))\nCouth(roscoe) and Depone(roscoe, conrad) -> Drift(conrad, margaret)\nforall x (Chain(x, conrad) and not Depone(x, roscoe) -> Linelike(conrad))\n\nDrift(conrad, margaret)\n\nCouth(roscoe) and Depone(roscoe, conrad) -> Drift(conrad, margaret) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The allianora is choleric. The allianora does not need the ellynn. The allianora does not visit the dyana. The dyana is torturous. The ellynn is outgoing. The ellynn tenant the allianora. The ellynn enter the allianora. If someone tenant the allianora then they do not like the dyana. If someone thud the dyana and they need the dyana then the dyana tenant the allianora. If someone thud the allianora and the allianora enter the ellynn then the allianora is choleric. If someone enter the dyana then the dyana is anonymous. If the dyana is choleric and the dyana tenant the allianora then the allianora thud the ellynn. If someone enter the allianora and they do not like the dyana then the allianora is anonymous. The dyana is not anonymous.", "logic": "\nCholeric(allianora)\nnot Enter(allianora, ellynn)\nnot Thud(allianora, dyana)\nTorturous(dyana)\nOutgoing(ellynn)\nTenant(ellynn, allianora)\nEnter(ellynn, allianora)\nforall x (Tenant(x, allianora) -> not Tenant(x, dyana))\nforall x (Thud(x, dyana) and Enter(x, dyana) -> Tenant(dyana, allianora))\nforall x (Thud(x, allianora) and Enter(allianora, ellynn) -> Choleric(allianora))\nforall x (Enter(x, dyana) -> Anonymous(dyana))\nCholeric(dyana) and Tenant(dyana, allianora) -> Thud(allianora, ellynn)\nforall x (Enter(x, allianora) and not Tenant(x, dyana) -> Anonymous(allianora))\n\nnot Anonymous(dyana)\n\nforall x (Enter(x, dyana) -> Anonymous(dyana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The charlean is aspiring. The charlean does not need the conrad. The charlean does not visit the stafani. The stafani is stately. The conrad is feral. The conrad obnubilate the charlean. The conrad glamourize the charlean. If someone obnubilate the charlean then they do not like the stafani. If someone palm the stafani and they need the stafani then the stafani obnubilate the charlean. If someone palm the charlean and the charlean glamourize the conrad then the charlean is aspiring. If someone glamourize the stafani then the stafani is nighted. If the stafani is aspiring and the stafani obnubilate the charlean then the charlean palm the conrad. If someone glamourize the charlean and they do not like the stafani then the charlean is nighted. The conrad is nighted.", "logic": "\nAspiring(charlean)\nnot Glamourize(charlean, conrad)\nnot Palm(charlean, stafani)\nStately(stafani)\nFeral(conrad)\nObnubilate(conrad, charlean)\nGlamourize(conrad, charlean)\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, charlean) -> not Obnubilate(x, stafani))\nforall x (Palm(x, stafani) and Glamourize(x, stafani) -> Obnubilate(stafani, charlean))\nforall x (Palm(x, charlean) and Glamourize(charlean, conrad) -> Aspiring(charlean))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, stafani) -> Nighted(stafani))\nAspiring(stafani) and Obnubilate(stafani, charlean) -> Palm(charlean, conrad)\nforall x (Glamourize(x, charlean) and not Obnubilate(x, stafani) -> Nighted(charlean))\n\nNighted(conrad)\n\nNighted(conrad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The mickie is assistant. The mickie does not need the armando. The mickie does not visit the lizabeth. The lizabeth is indelicate. The armando is amino. The armando lounge the mickie. The armando outsmart the mickie. If someone lounge the mickie then they do not like the lizabeth. If someone blither the lizabeth and they need the lizabeth then the lizabeth lounge the mickie. If someone blither the mickie and the mickie outsmart the armando then the mickie is assistant. If someone outsmart the lizabeth then the lizabeth is spangled. If the lizabeth is assistant and the lizabeth lounge the mickie then the mickie blither the armando. If someone outsmart the mickie and they do not like the lizabeth then the mickie is spangled. The lizabeth does not like the lizabeth.", "logic": "\nAssistant(mickie)\nnot Outsmart(mickie, armando)\nnot Blither(mickie, lizabeth)\nIndelicate(lizabeth)\nAmino(armando)\nLounge(armando, mickie)\nOutsmart(armando, mickie)\nforall x (Lounge(x, mickie) -> not Lounge(x, lizabeth))\nforall x (Blither(x, lizabeth) and Outsmart(x, lizabeth) -> Lounge(lizabeth, mickie))\nforall x (Blither(x, mickie) and Outsmart(mickie, armando) -> Assistant(mickie))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, lizabeth) -> Spangled(lizabeth))\nAssistant(lizabeth) and Lounge(lizabeth, mickie) -> Blither(mickie, armando)\nforall x (Outsmart(x, mickie) and not Lounge(x, lizabeth) -> Spangled(mickie))\n\nnot Lounge(lizabeth, lizabeth)\n\nnot Lounge(lizabeth, lizabeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "The margarita is bicorned. The margarita does not need the hezekiah. The margarita does not visit the irving. The irving is sextuple. The hezekiah is blunt. The hezekiah inject the margarita. The hezekiah wrong the margarita. If someone inject the margarita then they do not like the irving. If someone fragment the irving and they need the irving then the irving inject the margarita. If someone fragment the margarita and the margarita wrong the hezekiah then the margarita is bicorned. If someone wrong the irving then the irving is forlorn. If the irving is bicorned and the irving inject the margarita then the margarita fragment the hezekiah. If someone wrong the margarita and they do not like the irving then the margarita is forlorn. The hezekiah is blue.", "logic": "\nBicorned(margarita)\nnot Wrong(margarita, hezekiah)\nnot Fragment(margarita, irving)\nSextuple(irving)\nBlunt(hezekiah)\nInject(hezekiah, margarita)\nWrong(hezekiah, margarita)\nforall x (Inject(x, margarita) -> not Inject(x, irving))\nforall x (Fragment(x, irving) and Wrong(x, irving) -> Inject(irving, margarita))\nforall x (Fragment(x, margarita) and Wrong(margarita, hezekiah) -> Bicorned(margarita))\nforall x (Wrong(x, irving) -> Forlorn(irving))\nBicorned(irving) and Inject(irving, margarita) -> Fragment(margarita, hezekiah)\nforall x (Wrong(x, margarita) and not Inject(x, irving) -> Forlorn(margarita))\n\nBlue(hezekiah)\n\nBlue(hezekiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1447"} {"premises": "Lisbeth is concerted. Lisbeth is purifying. Lisbeth is fulgurant. If something is identical then it is sunbaked. All purifying, concerted things are turkish. Furry, sunbaked things are identical. If Lisbeth is fulgurant then Lisbeth is cryptical. If something is purifying and turkish then it is identical. Red things are purifying. Lisbeth is concerted.", "logic": "\nConcerted(lisbeth)\nPurifying(lisbeth)\nFulgurant(lisbeth)\nforall x (Identical(x) -> Sunbaked(x))\nforall x (Purifying(x) and Concerted(x) -> Turkish(x))\nforall x (Cryptical(x) and Sunbaked(x) -> Identical(x))\nFulgurant(lisbeth) -> Cryptical(lisbeth)\nforall x (Purifying(x) and Turkish(x) -> Identical(x))\nforall x (Fulgurant(x) -> Purifying(x))\n\nConcerted(lisbeth)\n\ntherefore Concerted(lisbeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Sandie is twenty. Sandie is splayfoot. Sandie is healthful. If something is virulent then it is primo. All splayfoot, twenty things are unedited. Furry, primo things are virulent. If Sandie is healthful then Sandie is untreated. If something is splayfoot and unedited then it is virulent. Red things are splayfoot. Sandie is not splayfoot.", "logic": "\nTwenty(sandie)\nSplayfoot(sandie)\nHealthful(sandie)\nforall x (Virulent(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Twenty(x) -> Unedited(x))\nforall x (Untreated(x) and Primo(x) -> Virulent(x))\nHealthful(sandie) -> Untreated(sandie)\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and Unedited(x) -> Virulent(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\n\nnot Splayfoot(sandie)\n\ntherefore Splayfoot(sandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Karie is staggering. Karie is bacillary. Karie is preferable. If something is libelous then it is antennal. All bacillary, staggering things are raspy. Furry, antennal things are libelous. If Karie is preferable then Karie is askew. If something is bacillary and raspy then it is libelous. Red things are bacillary. Karie is askew.", "logic": "\nStaggering(karie)\nBacillary(karie)\nPreferable(karie)\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Bacillary(x) and Staggering(x) -> Raspy(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) and Antennal(x) -> Libelous(x))\nPreferable(karie) -> Askew(karie)\nforall x (Bacillary(x) and Raspy(x) -> Libelous(x))\nforall x (Preferable(x) -> Bacillary(x))\n\nAskew(karie)\n\nPreferable(karie) and Preferable(karie) -> Askew(karie) -> therefore Askew(karie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Keenan is spanking. Keenan is arcane. Keenan is chylous. If something is derived then it is vacuolated. All arcane, spanking things are onetime. Furry, vacuolated things are derived. If Keenan is chylous then Keenan is buttressed. If something is arcane and onetime then it is derived. Red things are arcane. Keenan is not onetime.", "logic": "\nSpanking(keenan)\nArcane(keenan)\nChylous(keenan)\nforall x (Derived(x) -> Vacuolated(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Spanking(x) -> Onetime(x))\nforall x (Buttressed(x) and Vacuolated(x) -> Derived(x))\nChylous(keenan) -> Buttressed(keenan)\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Onetime(x) -> Derived(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Arcane(x))\n\nnot Onetime(keenan)\n\nArcane(keenan) and Spanking(keenan) and forall x (Arcane(x) and Spanking(x) -> Onetime(x)) -> therefore Onetime(keenan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Alaine is tapped. Alaine is forbidding. Alaine is arcadian. If something is cherry then it is rakish. All forbidding, tapped things are rotary. Furry, rakish things are cherry. If Alaine is arcadian then Alaine is snazzy. If something is forbidding and rotary then it is cherry. Red things are forbidding. Alaine is cherry.", "logic": "\nTapped(alaine)\nForbidding(alaine)\nArcadian(alaine)\nforall x (Cherry(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) and Tapped(x) -> Rotary(x))\nforall x (Snazzy(x) and Rakish(x) -> Cherry(x))\nArcadian(alaine) -> Snazzy(alaine)\nforall x (Forbidding(x) and Rotary(x) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> Forbidding(x))\n\nCherry(alaine)\n\nForbidding(alaine) and Tapped(alaine) and forall x (Forbidding(x) and Tapped(x) -> Rotary(x)) -> therefore Rotary(alaine) Forbidding(alaine) and Rotary(alaine) and forall x (Forbidding(x) and Rotary(x) -> Cherry(x)) -> therefore Cherry(alaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Gratiana is blonde. Gratiana is unwoven. Gratiana is exiguous. If something is glary then it is revertible. All unwoven, blonde things are cassocked. Furry, revertible things are glary. If Gratiana is exiguous then Gratiana is governing. If something is unwoven and cassocked then it is glary. Red things are unwoven. Gratiana is not glary.", "logic": "\nBlonde(gratiana)\nUnwoven(gratiana)\nExiguous(gratiana)\nforall x (Glary(x) -> Revertible(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Blonde(x) -> Cassocked(x))\nforall x (Governing(x) and Revertible(x) -> Glary(x))\nExiguous(gratiana) -> Governing(gratiana)\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Cassocked(x) -> Glary(x))\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Unwoven(x))\n\nnot Glary(gratiana)\n\nUnwoven(gratiana) and Blonde(gratiana) and forall x (Unwoven(x) and Blonde(x) -> Cassocked(x)) -> therefore Cassocked(gratiana) Unwoven(gratiana) and Cassocked(gratiana) and forall x (Unwoven(x) and Cassocked(x) -> Glary(x)) -> therefore Glary(gratiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Rosanne is spastic. Rosanne is musical. Rosanne is serene. If something is priestlike then it is tangled. All musical, spastic things are banal. Furry, tangled things are priestlike. If Rosanne is serene then Rosanne is grisly. If something is musical and banal then it is priestlike. Red things are musical. Rosanne is tangled.", "logic": "\nSpastic(rosanne)\nMusical(rosanne)\nSerene(rosanne)\nforall x (Priestlike(x) -> Tangled(x))\nforall x (Musical(x) and Spastic(x) -> Banal(x))\nforall x (Grisly(x) and Tangled(x) -> Priestlike(x))\nSerene(rosanne) -> Grisly(rosanne)\nforall x (Musical(x) and Banal(x) -> Priestlike(x))\nforall x (Serene(x) -> Musical(x))\n\nTangled(rosanne)\n\nMusical(rosanne) and Spastic(rosanne) and forall x (Musical(x) and Spastic(x) -> Banal(x)) -> therefore Banal(rosanne) Musical(rosanne) and Banal(rosanne) and forall x (Musical(x) and Banal(x) -> Priestlike(x)) -> therefore Priestlike(rosanne) Priestlike(rosanne) and forall x (Priestlike(x) -> Tangled(x)) -> therefore Tangled(rosanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "Alfie is thickened. Alfie is cyprinid. Alfie is untroubled. If something is rancorous then it is sinhala. All cyprinid, thickened things are disabling. Furry, sinhala things are rancorous. If Alfie is untroubled then Alfie is violable. If something is cyprinid and disabling then it is rancorous. Red things are cyprinid. Alfie is not sinhala.", "logic": "\nThickened(alfie)\nCyprinid(alfie)\nUntroubled(alfie)\nforall x (Rancorous(x) -> Sinhala(x))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Thickened(x) -> Disabling(x))\nforall x (Violable(x) and Sinhala(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nUntroubled(alfie) -> Violable(alfie)\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Disabling(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\n\nnot Sinhala(alfie)\n\nCyprinid(alfie) and Thickened(alfie) and forall x (Cyprinid(x) and Thickened(x) -> Disabling(x)) -> therefore Disabling(alfie) Cyprinid(alfie) and Disabling(alfie) and forall x (Cyprinid(x) and Disabling(x) -> Rancorous(x)) -> therefore Rancorous(alfie) Rancorous(alfie) and forall x (Rancorous(x) -> Sinhala(x)) -> therefore Sinhala(alfie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-265"} {"premises": "The jethro is formulated. The jethro is simple. The jethro is catalan. If someone is aphonic and simple then they are catalan. If the jethro is catalan then the jethro is simple. All simple people are not cultivated. The jethro is catalan.", "logic": "\nFormulated(jethro)\nSimple(jethro)\nCatalan(jethro)\nforall x (Aphonic(x) and Simple(x) -> Catalan(x))\nCatalan(jethro) -> Simple(jethro)\nforall x (Simple(x) -> not Cultivated(x))\n\nCatalan(jethro)\n\ntherefore Catalan(jethro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "The dora is content. The dora is totaled. The dora is freelance. If someone is platonic and totaled then they are freelance. If the dora is freelance then the dora is totaled. All totaled people are not ultra. The dora is not content.", "logic": "\nContent(dora)\nTotaled(dora)\nFreelance(dora)\nforall x (Platonic(x) and Totaled(x) -> Freelance(x))\nFreelance(dora) -> Totaled(dora)\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> not Ultra(x))\n\nnot Content(dora)\n\ntherefore Content(dora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "The alli is gluteal. The alli is scaley. The alli is tentative. If someone is stale and scaley then they are tentative. If the alli is tentative then the alli is scaley. All scaley people are not carbonylic. The alli is not carbonylic.", "logic": "\nGluteal(alli)\nScaley(alli)\nTentative(alli)\nforall x (Stale(x) and Scaley(x) -> Tentative(x))\nTentative(alli) -> Scaley(alli)\nforall x (Scaley(x) -> not Carbonylic(x))\n\nnot Carbonylic(alli)\n\nScaley(alli) and forall x (Scaley(x) -> not Carbonylic(x)) -> therefore not Carbonylic(alli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "The heywood is mormon. The heywood is subocular. The heywood is ismaili. If someone is pulverized and subocular then they are ismaili. If the heywood is ismaili then the heywood is subocular. All subocular people are not streaky. The heywood is streaky.", "logic": "\nMormon(heywood)\nSubocular(heywood)\nIsmaili(heywood)\nforall x (Pulverized(x) and Subocular(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nIsmaili(heywood) -> Subocular(heywood)\nforall x (Subocular(x) -> not Streaky(x))\n\nStreaky(heywood)\n\nSubocular(heywood) and forall x (Subocular(x) -> not Streaky(x)) -> therefore not Streaky(heywood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "The thia is diurnal. The thia is dismantled. The thia is goalless. If someone is convivial and dismantled then they are goalless. If the thia is goalless then the thia is dismantled. All dismantled people are not luminous. The thia does not chase the thia.", "logic": "\nDiurnal(thia)\nDismantled(thia)\nGoalless(thia)\nforall x (Convivial(x) and Dismantled(x) -> Goalless(x))\nGoalless(thia) -> Dismantled(thia)\nforall x (Dismantled(x) -> not Luminous(x))\n\nnot Chases(thia, thia)\n\nnot Chases(thia, thia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "The alvera is pilose. The alvera is unbleached. The alvera is veined. If someone is shuddering and unbleached then they are veined. If the alvera is veined then the alvera is unbleached. All unbleached people are not teen. The alvera sees the alvera.", "logic": "\nPilose(alvera)\nUnbleached(alvera)\nVeined(alvera)\nforall x (Shuddering(x) and Unbleached(x) -> Veined(x))\nVeined(alvera) -> Unbleached(alvera)\nforall x (Unbleached(x) -> not Teen(x))\n\nSees(alvera, alvera)\n\nSees(alvera, alvera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "The meryl is sightless. The meryl is lowland. The meryl is geniculate. If someone is braless and lowland then they are geniculate. If the meryl is geniculate then the meryl is lowland. All lowland people are not able. The meryl is not braless.", "logic": "\nSightless(meryl)\nLowland(meryl)\nGeniculate(meryl)\nforall x (Braless(x) and Lowland(x) -> Geniculate(x))\nGeniculate(meryl) -> Lowland(meryl)\nforall x (Lowland(x) -> not Able(x))\n\nnot Braless(meryl)\n\nnot Braless(meryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "The bertine is phlegmatic. The bertine is vehement. The bertine is pouring. If someone is spanish and vehement then they are pouring. If the bertine is pouring then the bertine is vehement. All vehement people are not limited. The bertine needs the bertine.", "logic": "\nPhlegmatic(bertine)\nVehement(bertine)\nPouring(bertine)\nforall x (Spanish(x) and Vehement(x) -> Pouring(x))\nPouring(bertine) -> Vehement(bertine)\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> not Limited(x))\n\nNeeds(bertine, bertine)\n\nNeeds(bertine, bertine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-78"} {"premises": "Tillie is oppositive. Tillie is northmost. Tillie is dwindling. Tillie is anticancer. Tillie is supporting. Tillie is roaring. Tillie is sooty. Wyatt is oppositive. Wyatt is not anticancer. Wyatt is not sooty. Swen is oppositive. Swen is northmost. Swen is dwindling. Swen is supporting. Swen is roaring. Swen is sooty. If Swen is supporting then Swen is anticancer. All anticancer people are supporting. If someone is northmost and not anticancer then they are roaring. If someone is roaring and not supporting then they are not northmost. All sooty, roaring people are oppositive. If someone is dwindling and not sooty then they are not oppositive. Tillie is anticancer.", "logic": "\nOppositive(tillie)\nNorthmost(tillie)\nDwindling(tillie)\nAnticancer(tillie)\nSupporting(tillie)\nRoaring(tillie)\nSooty(tillie)\nOppositive(wyatt)\nnot Anticancer(wyatt)\nnot Sooty(wyatt)\nOppositive(swen)\nNorthmost(swen)\nDwindling(swen)\nSupporting(swen)\nRoaring(swen)\nSooty(swen)\nSupporting(swen) -> Anticancer(swen)\nforall x (Anticancer(x) -> Supporting(x))\nforall x (Northmost(x) and not Anticancer(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) and not Supporting(x) -> not Northmost(x))\nforall x (Sooty(x) and Roaring(x) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Dwindling(x) and not Sooty(x) -> not Oppositive(x))\n\nAnticancer(tillie)\n\ntherefore Anticancer(tillie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Melosa is austenitic. Melosa is tart. Melosa is shaded. Melosa is toilsome. Melosa is factual. Melosa is diazo. Melosa is crumbly. Hobart is austenitic. Hobart is not toilsome. Hobart is not crumbly. Geri is austenitic. Geri is tart. Geri is shaded. Geri is factual. Geri is diazo. Geri is crumbly. If Geri is factual then Geri is toilsome. All toilsome people are factual. If someone is tart and not toilsome then they are diazo. If someone is diazo and not factual then they are not tart. All crumbly, diazo people are austenitic. If someone is shaded and not crumbly then they are not austenitic. Melosa is not diazo.", "logic": "\nAustenitic(melosa)\nTart(melosa)\nShaded(melosa)\nToilsome(melosa)\nFactual(melosa)\nDiazo(melosa)\nCrumbly(melosa)\nAustenitic(hobart)\nnot Toilsome(hobart)\nnot Crumbly(hobart)\nAustenitic(geri)\nTart(geri)\nShaded(geri)\nFactual(geri)\nDiazo(geri)\nCrumbly(geri)\nFactual(geri) -> Toilsome(geri)\nforall x (Toilsome(x) -> Factual(x))\nforall x (Tart(x) and not Toilsome(x) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Diazo(x) and not Factual(x) -> not Tart(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Diazo(x) -> Austenitic(x))\nforall x (Shaded(x) and not Crumbly(x) -> not Austenitic(x))\n\nnot Diazo(melosa)\n\ntherefore Diazo(melosa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Dieter is outspread. Dieter is lateral. Dieter is strapless. Dieter is chopfallen. Dieter is javanese. Dieter is calculated. Dieter is athenian. Mitchell is outspread. Mitchell is not chopfallen. Mitchell is not athenian. Birgitta is outspread. Birgitta is lateral. Birgitta is strapless. Birgitta is javanese. Birgitta is calculated. Birgitta is athenian. If Birgitta is javanese then Birgitta is chopfallen. All chopfallen people are javanese. If someone is lateral and not chopfallen then they are calculated. If someone is calculated and not javanese then they are not lateral. All athenian, calculated people are outspread. If someone is strapless and not athenian then they are not outspread. Birgitta is chopfallen.", "logic": "\nOutspread(dieter)\nLateral(dieter)\nStrapless(dieter)\nChopfallen(dieter)\nJavanese(dieter)\nCalculated(dieter)\nAthenian(dieter)\nOutspread(mitchell)\nnot Chopfallen(mitchell)\nnot Athenian(mitchell)\nOutspread(birgitta)\nLateral(birgitta)\nStrapless(birgitta)\nJavanese(birgitta)\nCalculated(birgitta)\nAthenian(birgitta)\nJavanese(birgitta) -> Chopfallen(birgitta)\nforall x (Chopfallen(x) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Lateral(x) and not Chopfallen(x) -> Calculated(x))\nforall x (Calculated(x) and not Javanese(x) -> not Lateral(x))\nforall x (Athenian(x) and Calculated(x) -> Outspread(x))\nforall x (Strapless(x) and not Athenian(x) -> not Outspread(x))\n\nChopfallen(birgitta)\n\nJavanese(birgitta) and Javanese(birgitta) -> Chopfallen(birgitta) -> therefore Chopfallen(birgitta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Tedman is mistakable. Tedman is provincial. Tedman is batrachian. Tedman is placental. Tedman is homeless. Tedman is besieged. Tedman is negligible. Vale is mistakable. Vale is not placental. Vale is not negligible. Micah is mistakable. Micah is provincial. Micah is batrachian. Micah is homeless. Micah is besieged. Micah is negligible. If Micah is homeless then Micah is placental. All placental people are homeless. If someone is provincial and not placental then they are besieged. If someone is besieged and not homeless then they are not provincial. All negligible, besieged people are mistakable. If someone is batrachian and not negligible then they are not mistakable. Micah is not placental.", "logic": "\nMistakable(tedman)\nProvincial(tedman)\nBatrachian(tedman)\nPlacental(tedman)\nHomeless(tedman)\nBesieged(tedman)\nNegligible(tedman)\nMistakable(vale)\nnot Placental(vale)\nnot Negligible(vale)\nMistakable(micah)\nProvincial(micah)\nBatrachian(micah)\nHomeless(micah)\nBesieged(micah)\nNegligible(micah)\nHomeless(micah) -> Placental(micah)\nforall x (Placental(x) -> Homeless(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) and not Placental(x) -> Besieged(x))\nforall x (Besieged(x) and not Homeless(x) -> not Provincial(x))\nforall x (Negligible(x) and Besieged(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) and not Negligible(x) -> not Mistakable(x))\n\nnot Placental(micah)\n\nHomeless(micah) and Homeless(micah) -> Placental(micah) -> therefore Placental(micah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Bud is pouched. Bud is fake. Bud is ungallant. Bud is accumbent. Bud is unbowed. Bud is beaklike. Bud is eviscerate. Wenona is pouched. Wenona is not accumbent. Wenona is not eviscerate. Gaston is pouched. Gaston is fake. Gaston is ungallant. Gaston is unbowed. Gaston is beaklike. Gaston is eviscerate. If Gaston is unbowed then Gaston is accumbent. All accumbent people are unbowed. If someone is fake and not accumbent then they are beaklike. If someone is beaklike and not unbowed then they are not fake. All eviscerate, beaklike people are pouched. If someone is ungallant and not eviscerate then they are not pouched. Wenona is not unbowed.", "logic": "\nPouched(bud)\nFake(bud)\nUngallant(bud)\nAccumbent(bud)\nUnbowed(bud)\nBeaklike(bud)\nEviscerate(bud)\nPouched(wenona)\nnot Accumbent(wenona)\nnot Eviscerate(wenona)\nPouched(gaston)\nFake(gaston)\nUngallant(gaston)\nUnbowed(gaston)\nBeaklike(gaston)\nEviscerate(gaston)\nUnbowed(gaston) -> Accumbent(gaston)\nforall x (Accumbent(x) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Fake(x) and not Accumbent(x) -> Beaklike(x))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) and not Unbowed(x) -> not Fake(x))\nforall x (Eviscerate(x) and Beaklike(x) -> Pouched(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and not Eviscerate(x) -> not Pouched(x))\n\nnot Unbowed(wenona)\n\nforall x (Accumbent(x) -> Unbowed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Chaddie is chechen. Chaddie is puffed. Chaddie is synchronic. Chaddie is prepared. Chaddie is colorectal. Chaddie is vulvar. Chaddie is drained. Krystle is chechen. Krystle is not prepared. Krystle is not drained. Bennie is chechen. Bennie is puffed. Bennie is synchronic. Bennie is colorectal. Bennie is vulvar. Bennie is drained. If Bennie is colorectal then Bennie is prepared. All prepared people are colorectal. If someone is puffed and not prepared then they are vulvar. If someone is vulvar and not colorectal then they are not puffed. All drained, vulvar people are chechen. If someone is synchronic and not drained then they are not chechen. Krystle is vulvar.", "logic": "\nChechen(chaddie)\nPuffed(chaddie)\nSynchronic(chaddie)\nPrepared(chaddie)\nColorectal(chaddie)\nVulvar(chaddie)\nDrained(chaddie)\nChechen(krystle)\nnot Prepared(krystle)\nnot Drained(krystle)\nChechen(bennie)\nPuffed(bennie)\nSynchronic(bennie)\nColorectal(bennie)\nVulvar(bennie)\nDrained(bennie)\nColorectal(bennie) -> Prepared(bennie)\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Puffed(x) and not Prepared(x) -> Vulvar(x))\nforall x (Vulvar(x) and not Colorectal(x) -> not Puffed(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) and Vulvar(x) -> Chechen(x))\nforall x (Synchronic(x) and not Drained(x) -> not Chechen(x))\n\nVulvar(krystle)\n\nforall x (Puffed(x) and not Prepared(x) -> Vulvar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Marcelle is atrophic. Marcelle is palsied. Marcelle is dumfounded. Marcelle is earthen. Marcelle is epithelial. Marcelle is professed. Marcelle is inexact. Benjy is atrophic. Benjy is not earthen. Benjy is not inexact. Pearla is atrophic. Pearla is palsied. Pearla is dumfounded. Pearla is epithelial. Pearla is professed. Pearla is inexact. If Pearla is epithelial then Pearla is earthen. All earthen people are epithelial. If someone is palsied and not earthen then they are professed. If someone is professed and not epithelial then they are not palsied. All inexact, professed people are atrophic. If someone is dumfounded and not inexact then they are not atrophic. Benjy is not palsied.", "logic": "\nAtrophic(marcelle)\nPalsied(marcelle)\nDumfounded(marcelle)\nEarthen(marcelle)\nEpithelial(marcelle)\nProfessed(marcelle)\nInexact(marcelle)\nAtrophic(benjy)\nnot Earthen(benjy)\nnot Inexact(benjy)\nAtrophic(pearla)\nPalsied(pearla)\nDumfounded(pearla)\nEpithelial(pearla)\nProfessed(pearla)\nInexact(pearla)\nEpithelial(pearla) -> Earthen(pearla)\nforall x (Earthen(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Palsied(x) and not Earthen(x) -> Professed(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) and not Epithelial(x) -> not Palsied(x))\nforall x (Inexact(x) and Professed(x) -> Atrophic(x))\nforall x (Dumfounded(x) and not Inexact(x) -> not Atrophic(x))\n\nnot Palsied(benjy)\n\nnot Palsied(benjy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Nils is pretend. Nils is repressing. Nils is hemic. Nils is dumb. Nils is hirsute. Nils is budding. Nils is consonant. Wald is pretend. Wald is not dumb. Wald is not consonant. Siobhan is pretend. Siobhan is repressing. Siobhan is hemic. Siobhan is hirsute. Siobhan is budding. Siobhan is consonant. If Siobhan is hirsute then Siobhan is dumb. All dumb people are hirsute. If someone is repressing and not dumb then they are budding. If someone is budding and not hirsute then they are not repressing. All consonant, budding people are pretend. If someone is hemic and not consonant then they are not pretend. Wald is hemic.", "logic": "\nPretend(nils)\nRepressing(nils)\nHemic(nils)\nDumb(nils)\nHirsute(nils)\nBudding(nils)\nConsonant(nils)\nPretend(wald)\nnot Dumb(wald)\nnot Consonant(wald)\nPretend(siobhan)\nRepressing(siobhan)\nHemic(siobhan)\nHirsute(siobhan)\nBudding(siobhan)\nConsonant(siobhan)\nHirsute(siobhan) -> Dumb(siobhan)\nforall x (Dumb(x) -> Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Repressing(x) and not Dumb(x) -> Budding(x))\nforall x (Budding(x) and not Hirsute(x) -> not Repressing(x))\nforall x (Consonant(x) and Budding(x) -> Pretend(x))\nforall x (Hemic(x) and not Consonant(x) -> not Pretend(x))\n\nHemic(wald)\n\nHemic(wald) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-190"} {"premises": "Marisa is papist. Marnie is overdue. All leechlike, tuppeny things are overdue. If Marisa is papist then Marisa is schmaltzy. Marisa is papist.", "logic": "\nPapist(marisa)\nOverdue(marnie)\nforall x (Leechlike(x) and Tuppeny(x) -> Overdue(x))\nPapist(marisa) -> Schmaltzy(marisa)\n\nPapist(marisa)\n\ntherefore Papist(marisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "Nealy is impeding. Hewet is unpolluted. All cretinous, trivalent things are unpolluted. If Nealy is impeding then Nealy is odorous. Hewet is not unpolluted.", "logic": "\nImpeding(nealy)\nUnpolluted(hewet)\nforall x (Cretinous(x) and Trivalent(x) -> Unpolluted(x))\nImpeding(nealy) -> Odorous(nealy)\n\nnot Unpolluted(hewet)\n\ntherefore Unpolluted(hewet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "Welsh is fabricated. Sylvie is axial. All upstairs, turbid things are axial. If Welsh is fabricated then Welsh is plutonic. Welsh is plutonic.", "logic": "\nFabricated(welsh)\nAxial(sylvie)\nforall x (Upstairs(x) and Turbid(x) -> Axial(x))\nFabricated(welsh) -> Plutonic(welsh)\n\nPlutonic(welsh)\n\nFabricated(welsh) and Fabricated(welsh) -> Plutonic(welsh) -> therefore Plutonic(welsh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "Lula is hidden. Aguinaldo is unreal. All rhyming, disabused things are unreal. If Lula is hidden then Lula is sprouted. Lula is not sprouted.", "logic": "\nHidden(lula)\nUnreal(aguinaldo)\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and Disabused(x) -> Unreal(x))\nHidden(lula) -> Sprouted(lula)\n\nnot Sprouted(lula)\n\nHidden(lula) and Hidden(lula) -> Sprouted(lula) -> therefore Sprouted(lula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "Cathleen is seared. Gwyn is military. All hieratical, teasing things are military. If Cathleen is seared then Cathleen is monogynous. Cathleen is not military.", "logic": "\nSeared(cathleen)\nMilitary(gwyn)\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Teasing(x) -> Military(x))\nSeared(cathleen) -> Monogynous(cathleen)\n\nnot Military(cathleen)\n\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Teasing(x) -> Military(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "Aretha is foolish. Ulla is extrovert. All accusive, kafkaesque things are extrovert. If Aretha is foolish then Aretha is occlusive. Ulla is foolish.", "logic": "\nFoolish(aretha)\nExtrovert(ulla)\nforall x (Accusive(x) and Kafkaesque(x) -> Extrovert(x))\nFoolish(aretha) -> Occlusive(aretha)\n\nFoolish(ulla)\n\nFoolish(ulla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "Colly is untenable. Nadiya is thermic. All mucinoid, celibate things are thermic. If Colly is untenable then Colly is banging. Colly is not mucinoid.", "logic": "\nUntenable(colly)\nThermic(nadiya)\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) and Celibate(x) -> Thermic(x))\nUntenable(colly) -> Banging(colly)\n\nnot Mucinoid(colly)\n\nnot Mucinoid(colly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "Delcina is magnetized. Leticia is cuddlesome. All authorial, throated things are cuddlesome. If Delcina is magnetized then Delcina is serrated. Delcina is throated.", "logic": "\nMagnetized(delcina)\nCuddlesome(leticia)\nforall x (Authorial(x) and Throated(x) -> Cuddlesome(x))\nMagnetized(delcina) -> Serrated(delcina)\n\nThroated(delcina)\n\nThroated(delcina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-924"} {"premises": "The cordy is conjugal. The arlinda reserve the chalmers. The chalmers reserve the cordy. If the arlinda intimidate the chalmers then the chalmers reserve the cordy. If something reserve the cordy and it is barred then the cordy boil the arlinda. If something intimidate the chalmers then the chalmers boil the cordy. If the arlinda reserve the cordy and the cordy reserve the chalmers then the arlinda reserve the chalmers. If the arlinda boil the chalmers and the arlinda is conjugal then the arlinda boil the cordy. If something intimidate the chalmers then it intimidate the arlinda. The arlinda reserve the chalmers.", "logic": "\nConjugal(cordy)\nReserve(arlinda, chalmers)\nReserve(chalmers, cordy)\nIntimidate(arlinda, chalmers) -> Reserve(chalmers, cordy)\nforall x (Reserve(x, cordy) and Barred(x) -> Boil(cordy, arlinda))\nforall x (Intimidate(x, chalmers) -> Boil(chalmers, cordy))\nReserve(arlinda, cordy) and Reserve(cordy, chalmers) -> Reserve(arlinda, chalmers)\nBoil(arlinda, chalmers) and Conjugal(arlinda) -> Boil(arlinda, cordy)\nforall x (Intimidate(x, chalmers) -> Intimidate(x, arlinda))\n\nReserve(arlinda, chalmers)\n\ntherefore Reserve(arlinda, chalmers)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6022"} {"premises": "The cordie is rateable. The morrie bicycle the olympie. The olympie bicycle the cordie. If the morrie bandy the olympie then the olympie bicycle the cordie. If something bicycle the cordie and it is initial then the cordie soldier the morrie. If something bandy the olympie then the olympie soldier the cordie. If the morrie bicycle the cordie and the cordie bicycle the olympie then the morrie bicycle the olympie. If the morrie soldier the olympie and the morrie is rateable then the morrie soldier the cordie. If something bandy the olympie then it bandy the morrie. The morrie does not like the olympie.", "logic": "\nRateable(cordie)\nBicycle(morrie, olympie)\nBicycle(olympie, cordie)\nBandy(morrie, olympie) -> Bicycle(olympie, cordie)\nforall x (Bicycle(x, cordie) and Initial(x) -> Soldier(cordie, morrie))\nforall x (Bandy(x, olympie) -> Soldier(olympie, cordie))\nBicycle(morrie, cordie) and Bicycle(cordie, olympie) -> Bicycle(morrie, olympie)\nSoldier(morrie, olympie) and Rateable(morrie) -> Soldier(morrie, cordie)\nforall x (Bandy(x, olympie) -> Bandy(x, morrie))\n\nnot Bicycle(morrie, olympie)\n\ntherefore Bicycle(morrie, olympie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6022"} {"premises": "The astra is boytrose. The randell assemble the simon. The simon assemble the astra. If the randell discase the simon then the simon assemble the astra. If something assemble the astra and it is vigilant then the astra scarf the randell. If something discase the simon then the simon scarf the astra. If the randell assemble the astra and the astra assemble the simon then the randell assemble the simon. If the randell scarf the simon and the randell is boytrose then the randell scarf the astra. If something discase the simon then it discase the randell. The randell does not see the astra.", "logic": "\nBoytrose(astra)\nAssemble(randell, simon)\nAssemble(simon, astra)\nDiscase(randell, simon) -> Assemble(simon, astra)\nforall x (Assemble(x, astra) and Vigilant(x) -> Scarf(astra, randell))\nforall x (Discase(x, simon) -> Scarf(simon, astra))\nAssemble(randell, astra) and Assemble(astra, simon) -> Assemble(randell, simon)\nScarf(randell, simon) and Boytrose(randell) -> Scarf(randell, astra)\nforall x (Discase(x, simon) -> Discase(x, randell))\n\nnot Scarf(randell, astra)\n\nScarf(randell, simon) and Boytrose(randell) -> Scarf(randell, astra) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6022"} {"premises": "The tann is reddish. The thornie wane the isa. The isa wane the tann. If the thornie side the isa then the isa wane the tann. If something wane the tann and it is renewed then the tann annul the thornie. If something side the isa then the isa annul the tann. If the thornie wane the tann and the tann wane the isa then the thornie wane the isa. If the thornie annul the isa and the thornie is reddish then the thornie annul the tann. If something side the isa then it side the thornie. The tann wane the isa.", "logic": "\nReddish(tann)\nWane(thornie, isa)\nWane(isa, tann)\nSide(thornie, isa) -> Wane(isa, tann)\nforall x (Wane(x, tann) and Renewed(x) -> Annul(tann, thornie))\nforall x (Side(x, isa) -> Annul(isa, tann))\nWane(thornie, tann) and Wane(tann, isa) -> Wane(thornie, isa)\nAnnul(thornie, isa) and Reddish(thornie) -> Annul(thornie, tann)\nforall x (Side(x, isa) -> Side(x, thornie))\n\nWane(tann, isa)\n\nWane(tann, isa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6022"} {"premises": "The piet is speaking. The eolande guard the westbrook. The maryrose guard the westbrook. The westbrook coapt the eolande. If something coapt the eolande then it guard the maryrose. If something coapt the piet then it guard the eolande. If the maryrose does not eat the eolande then the maryrose is not sarcastic. The maryrose guard the westbrook.", "logic": "\nSpeaking(piet)\nGuard(eolande, westbrook)\nGuard(maryrose, westbrook)\nCoapt(westbrook, eolande)\nforall x (Coapt(x, eolande) -> Guard(x, maryrose))\nforall x (Coapt(x, piet) -> Guard(x, eolande))\nnot Purse(maryrose, eolande) -> not Sarcastic(maryrose)\n\nGuard(maryrose, westbrook)\n\ntherefore Guard(maryrose, westbrook)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2695"} {"premises": "The terry is lunatic. The gail laze the klee. The roshelle laze the klee. The klee pinion the gail. If something pinion the gail then it laze the roshelle. If something pinion the terry then it laze the gail. If the roshelle does not eat the gail then the roshelle is not changeable. The roshelle does not need the klee.", "logic": "\nLunatic(terry)\nLaze(gail, klee)\nLaze(roshelle, klee)\nPinion(klee, gail)\nforall x (Pinion(x, gail) -> Laze(x, roshelle))\nforall x (Pinion(x, terry) -> Laze(x, gail))\nnot Seethe(roshelle, gail) -> not Changeable(roshelle)\n\nnot Laze(roshelle, klee)\n\ntherefore Laze(roshelle, klee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2695"} {"premises": "The blisse is owing. The louisa caricature the damara. The rosamond caricature the damara. The damara anticipate the louisa. If something anticipate the louisa then it caricature the rosamond. If something anticipate the blisse then it caricature the louisa. If the rosamond does not eat the louisa then the rosamond is not monastic. The damara does not need the louisa.", "logic": "\nOwing(blisse)\nCaricature(louisa, damara)\nCaricature(rosamond, damara)\nAnticipate(damara, louisa)\nforall x (Anticipate(x, louisa) -> Caricature(x, rosamond))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, blisse) -> Caricature(x, louisa))\nnot Patinise(rosamond, louisa) -> not Monastic(rosamond)\n\nnot Caricature(damara, louisa)\n\nforall x (Anticipate(x, blisse) -> Caricature(x, louisa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2695"} {"premises": "The silas is south. The midge powwow the salman. The lanita powwow the salman. The salman kennel the midge. If something kennel the midge then it powwow the lanita. If something kennel the silas then it powwow the midge. If the lanita does not eat the midge then the lanita is not tudor. The salman is blue.", "logic": "\nSouth(silas)\nPowwow(midge, salman)\nPowwow(lanita, salman)\nKennel(salman, midge)\nforall x (Kennel(x, midge) -> Powwow(x, lanita))\nforall x (Kennel(x, silas) -> Powwow(x, midge))\nnot Remake(lanita, midge) -> not Tudor(lanita)\n\nBlue(salman)\n\nBlue(salman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2695"} {"premises": "Merline is difficult. All roving people are bothersome. If Merline is difficult then Merline is hard. If someone is hard then they are roving. Round people are bothersome. All next, hard people are roving. Blue, roving people are hard. Merline is difficult.", "logic": "\nDifficult(merline)\nforall x (Roving(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nDifficult(merline) -> Hard(merline)\nforall x (Hard(x) -> Roving(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Bothersome(x))\nforall x (Next(x) and Hard(x) -> Roving(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) and Roving(x) -> Hard(x))\n\nDifficult(merline)\n\ntherefore Difficult(merline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Josef is rollicking. All diplomatic people are tired. If Josef is rollicking then Josef is cachectic. If someone is cachectic then they are diplomatic. Round people are tired. All carroty, cachectic people are diplomatic. Blue, diplomatic people are cachectic. Josef is not rollicking.", "logic": "\nRollicking(josef)\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) -> Tired(x))\nRollicking(josef) -> Cachectic(josef)\nforall x (Cachectic(x) -> Diplomatic(x))\nforall x (Trivalent(x) -> Tired(x))\nforall x (Carroty(x) and Cachectic(x) -> Diplomatic(x))\nforall x (Tired(x) and Diplomatic(x) -> Cachectic(x))\n\nnot Rollicking(josef)\n\ntherefore Rollicking(josef)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Anetta is appalled. All coordinate people are spiny. If Anetta is appalled then Anetta is recreant. If someone is recreant then they are coordinate. Round people are spiny. All expected, recreant people are coordinate. Blue, coordinate people are recreant. Anetta is recreant.", "logic": "\nAppalled(anetta)\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Spiny(x))\nAppalled(anetta) -> Recreant(anetta)\nforall x (Recreant(x) -> Coordinate(x))\nforall x (Smokeless(x) -> Spiny(x))\nforall x (Expected(x) and Recreant(x) -> Coordinate(x))\nforall x (Spiny(x) and Coordinate(x) -> Recreant(x))\n\nRecreant(anetta)\n\nAppalled(anetta) and Appalled(anetta) -> Recreant(anetta) -> therefore Recreant(anetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Andree is peremptory. All underage people are foldaway. If Andree is peremptory then Andree is phonic. If someone is phonic then they are underage. Round people are foldaway. All uraemic, phonic people are underage. Blue, underage people are phonic. Andree is not phonic.", "logic": "\nPeremptory(andree)\nforall x (Underage(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nPeremptory(andree) -> Phonic(andree)\nforall x (Phonic(x) -> Underage(x))\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Uraemic(x) and Phonic(x) -> Underage(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) and Underage(x) -> Phonic(x))\n\nnot Phonic(andree)\n\nPeremptory(andree) and Peremptory(andree) -> Phonic(andree) -> therefore Phonic(andree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Gavra is tortuous. All devoid people are undyed. If Gavra is tortuous then Gavra is pokey. If someone is pokey then they are devoid. Round people are undyed. All unnameable, pokey people are devoid. Blue, devoid people are pokey. Gavra is devoid.", "logic": "\nTortuous(gavra)\nforall x (Devoid(x) -> Undyed(x))\nTortuous(gavra) -> Pokey(gavra)\nforall x (Pokey(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Undyed(x))\nforall x (Unnameable(x) and Pokey(x) -> Devoid(x))\nforall x (Undyed(x) and Devoid(x) -> Pokey(x))\n\nDevoid(gavra)\n\nTortuous(gavra) and Tortuous(gavra) -> Pokey(gavra) -> therefore Pokey(gavra) Pokey(gavra) and forall x (Pokey(x) -> Devoid(x)) -> therefore Devoid(gavra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Melina is maximal. All overladen people are longish. If Melina is maximal then Melina is scientific. If someone is scientific then they are overladen. Round people are longish. All unbending, scientific people are overladen. Blue, overladen people are scientific. Melina is not overladen.", "logic": "\nMaximal(melina)\nforall x (Overladen(x) -> Longish(x))\nMaximal(melina) -> Scientific(melina)\nforall x (Scientific(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Caucasoid(x) -> Longish(x))\nforall x (Unbending(x) and Scientific(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Longish(x) and Overladen(x) -> Scientific(x))\n\nnot Overladen(melina)\n\nMaximal(melina) and Maximal(melina) -> Scientific(melina) -> therefore Scientific(melina) Scientific(melina) and forall x (Scientific(x) -> Overladen(x)) -> therefore Overladen(melina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Bettie is ritardando. All talkative people are polar. If Bettie is ritardando then Bettie is scotch. If someone is scotch then they are talkative. Round people are polar. All moral, scotch people are talkative. Blue, talkative people are scotch. Bettie is polar.", "logic": "\nRitardando(bettie)\nforall x (Talkative(x) -> Polar(x))\nRitardando(bettie) -> Scotch(bettie)\nforall x (Scotch(x) -> Talkative(x))\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> Polar(x))\nforall x (Moral(x) and Scotch(x) -> Talkative(x))\nforall x (Polar(x) and Talkative(x) -> Scotch(x))\n\nPolar(bettie)\n\nRitardando(bettie) and Ritardando(bettie) -> Scotch(bettie) -> therefore Scotch(bettie) Scotch(bettie) and forall x (Scotch(x) -> Talkative(x)) -> therefore Talkative(bettie) Talkative(bettie) and forall x (Talkative(x) -> Polar(x)) -> therefore Polar(bettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Joela is atrophic. All sublimate people are boorish. If Joela is atrophic then Joela is continuant. If someone is continuant then they are sublimate. Round people are boorish. All argentine, continuant people are sublimate. Blue, sublimate people are continuant. Joela is not boorish.", "logic": "\nAtrophic(joela)\nforall x (Sublimate(x) -> Boorish(x))\nAtrophic(joela) -> Continuant(joela)\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Anionic(x) -> Boorish(x))\nforall x (Argentine(x) and Continuant(x) -> Sublimate(x))\nforall x (Boorish(x) and Sublimate(x) -> Continuant(x))\n\nnot Boorish(joela)\n\nAtrophic(joela) and Atrophic(joela) -> Continuant(joela) -> therefore Continuant(joela) Continuant(joela) and forall x (Continuant(x) -> Sublimate(x)) -> therefore Sublimate(joela) Sublimate(joela) and forall x (Sublimate(x) -> Boorish(x)) -> therefore Boorish(joela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Esme is altaic. All inverted people are socialist. If Esme is altaic then Esme is gladsome. If someone is gladsome then they are inverted. Round people are socialist. All material, gladsome people are inverted. Blue, inverted people are gladsome. Esme is not subsurface.", "logic": "\nAltaic(esme)\nforall x (Inverted(x) -> Socialist(x))\nAltaic(esme) -> Gladsome(esme)\nforall x (Gladsome(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Subsurface(x) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Material(x) and Gladsome(x) -> Inverted(x))\nforall x (Socialist(x) and Inverted(x) -> Gladsome(x))\n\nnot Subsurface(esme)\n\nnot Subsurface(esme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Moina is stoneless. All profitable people are idyllic. If Moina is stoneless then Moina is punitive. If someone is punitive then they are profitable. Round people are idyllic. All barefaced, punitive people are profitable. Blue, profitable people are punitive. Moina is nice.", "logic": "\nStoneless(moina)\nforall x (Profitable(x) -> Idyllic(x))\nStoneless(moina) -> Punitive(moina)\nforall x (Punitive(x) -> Profitable(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Idyllic(x))\nforall x (Barefaced(x) and Punitive(x) -> Profitable(x))\nforall x (Idyllic(x) and Profitable(x) -> Punitive(x))\n\nNice(moina)\n\nNice(moina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-575"} {"premises": "Norwood is not lowset. Norwood is not chorionic. Norwood is placed. Norwood is not costumed. Norwood is not nagging. Shina is not lowset. Shina is chorionic. Shina is placed. Shina is not costumed. Shina is nagging. If Shina is costumed then Shina is not lowset. If something is costumed and lowset then it is placed. If something is chorionic and lowset then it is placed. Shina is chorionic.", "logic": "\nnot Lowset(norwood)\nnot Chorionic(norwood)\nPlaced(norwood)\nnot Costumed(norwood)\nnot Nagging(norwood)\nnot Lowset(shina)\nChorionic(shina)\nPlaced(shina)\nnot Costumed(shina)\nNagging(shina)\nCostumed(shina) -> not Lowset(shina)\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Lowset(x) -> Placed(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) and Lowset(x) -> Placed(x))\n\nChorionic(shina)\n\ntherefore Chorionic(shina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6598"} {"premises": "Tucky is not jolting. Tucky is not touristy. Tucky is peeved. Tucky is not peruked. Tucky is not brooding. Hephzibah is not jolting. Hephzibah is touristy. Hephzibah is peeved. Hephzibah is not peruked. Hephzibah is brooding. If Hephzibah is peruked then Hephzibah is not jolting. If something is peruked and jolting then it is peeved. If something is touristy and jolting then it is peeved. Hephzibah is not brooding.", "logic": "\nnot Jolting(tucky)\nnot Touristy(tucky)\nPeeved(tucky)\nnot Peruked(tucky)\nnot Brooding(tucky)\nnot Jolting(hephzibah)\nTouristy(hephzibah)\nPeeved(hephzibah)\nnot Peruked(hephzibah)\nBrooding(hephzibah)\nPeruked(hephzibah) -> not Jolting(hephzibah)\nforall x (Peruked(x) and Jolting(x) -> Peeved(x))\nforall x (Touristy(x) and Jolting(x) -> Peeved(x))\n\nnot Brooding(hephzibah)\n\ntherefore Brooding(hephzibah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6598"} {"premises": "Kalie is not denatured. Kalie is not ribbonlike. Kalie is hellenic. Kalie is not plugged. Kalie is not gamey. Debra is not denatured. Debra is ribbonlike. Debra is hellenic. Debra is not plugged. Debra is gamey. If Debra is plugged then Debra is not denatured. If something is plugged and denatured then it is hellenic. If something is ribbonlike and denatured then it is hellenic. Kalie is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Denatured(kalie)\nnot Ribbonlike(kalie)\nHellenic(kalie)\nnot Plugged(kalie)\nnot Gamey(kalie)\nnot Denatured(debra)\nRibbonlike(debra)\nHellenic(debra)\nnot Plugged(debra)\nGamey(debra)\nPlugged(debra) -> not Denatured(debra)\nforall x (Plugged(x) and Denatured(x) -> Hellenic(x))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Denatured(x) -> Hellenic(x))\n\nnot Round(kalie)\n\nnot Round(kalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6598"} {"premises": "Annadiane is not avirulent. Annadiane is not unfueled. Annadiane is unbearable. Annadiane is not indebted. Annadiane is not adoptable. Ana is not avirulent. Ana is unfueled. Ana is unbearable. Ana is not indebted. Ana is adoptable. If Ana is indebted then Ana is not avirulent. If something is indebted and avirulent then it is unbearable. If something is unfueled and avirulent then it is unbearable. Ana is furry.", "logic": "\nnot Avirulent(annadiane)\nnot Unfueled(annadiane)\nUnbearable(annadiane)\nnot Indebted(annadiane)\nnot Adoptable(annadiane)\nnot Avirulent(ana)\nUnfueled(ana)\nUnbearable(ana)\nnot Indebted(ana)\nAdoptable(ana)\nIndebted(ana) -> not Avirulent(ana)\nforall x (Indebted(x) and Avirulent(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) and Avirulent(x) -> Unbearable(x))\n\nFurry(ana)\n\nFurry(ana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6598"} {"premises": "Herta is neoplastic. Pavel is flatulent. Jewell is bicuspid. Griffin is shocking. Blue things are meteoric. If something is shocking then it is neoplastic. If something is meteoric then it is flatulent. If Herta is promotive and Herta is meteoric then Herta is flatulent. If Pavel is idiomatic and Pavel is shocking then Pavel is meteoric. Round things are promotive. All flatulent, neoplastic things are idiomatic. All meteoric things are promotive. Jewell is bicuspid.", "logic": "\nNeoplastic(herta)\nFlatulent(pavel)\nBicuspid(jewell)\nShocking(griffin)\nforall x (Neoplastic(x) -> Meteoric(x))\nforall x (Shocking(x) -> Neoplastic(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) -> Flatulent(x))\nPromotive(herta) and Meteoric(herta) -> Flatulent(herta)\nIdiomatic(pavel) and Shocking(pavel) -> Meteoric(pavel)\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) -> Promotive(x))\nforall x (Flatulent(x) and Neoplastic(x) -> Idiomatic(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) -> Promotive(x))\n\nBicuspid(jewell)\n\ntherefore Bicuspid(jewell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Giorgio is untruthful. Sibylla is parented. Harriet is boyish. Ivory is stuck. Blue things are valved. If something is stuck then it is untruthful. If something is valved then it is parented. If Giorgio is okay and Giorgio is valved then Giorgio is parented. If Sibylla is saucy and Sibylla is stuck then Sibylla is valved. Round things are okay. All parented, untruthful things are saucy. All valved things are okay. Ivory is not stuck.", "logic": "\nUntruthful(giorgio)\nParented(sibylla)\nBoyish(harriet)\nStuck(ivory)\nforall x (Untruthful(x) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Stuck(x) -> Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Parented(x))\nOkay(giorgio) and Valved(giorgio) -> Parented(giorgio)\nSaucy(sibylla) and Stuck(sibylla) -> Valved(sibylla)\nforall x (Saucy(x) -> Okay(x))\nforall x (Parented(x) and Untruthful(x) -> Saucy(x))\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Okay(x))\n\nnot Stuck(ivory)\n\ntherefore Stuck(ivory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Anselm is glittery. Rayner is restive. Nestor is lifelike. Brandie is amoeboid. Blue things are hollywood. If something is amoeboid then it is glittery. If something is hollywood then it is restive. If Anselm is azoic and Anselm is hollywood then Anselm is restive. If Rayner is buoyant and Rayner is amoeboid then Rayner is hollywood. Round things are azoic. All restive, glittery things are buoyant. All hollywood things are azoic. Brandie is glittery.", "logic": "\nGlittery(anselm)\nRestive(rayner)\nLifelike(nestor)\nAmoeboid(brandie)\nforall x (Glittery(x) -> Hollywood(x))\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Glittery(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) -> Restive(x))\nAzoic(anselm) and Hollywood(anselm) -> Restive(anselm)\nBuoyant(rayner) and Amoeboid(rayner) -> Hollywood(rayner)\nforall x (Buoyant(x) -> Azoic(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) and Glittery(x) -> Buoyant(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) -> Azoic(x))\n\nGlittery(brandie)\n\nAmoeboid(brandie) and forall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Glittery(x)) -> therefore Glittery(brandie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Viki is expanded. Ambrosi is quondam. Mikel is decreed. Samaria is murine. Blue things are nervous. If something is murine then it is expanded. If something is nervous then it is quondam. If Viki is delighted and Viki is nervous then Viki is quondam. If Ambrosi is betting and Ambrosi is murine then Ambrosi is nervous. Round things are delighted. All quondam, expanded things are betting. All nervous things are delighted. Viki is not nervous.", "logic": "\nExpanded(viki)\nQuondam(ambrosi)\nDecreed(mikel)\nMurine(samaria)\nforall x (Expanded(x) -> Nervous(x))\nforall x (Murine(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) -> Quondam(x))\nDelighted(viki) and Nervous(viki) -> Quondam(viki)\nBetting(ambrosi) and Murine(ambrosi) -> Nervous(ambrosi)\nforall x (Betting(x) -> Delighted(x))\nforall x (Quondam(x) and Expanded(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) -> Delighted(x))\n\nnot Nervous(viki)\n\nExpanded(viki) and forall x (Expanded(x) -> Nervous(x)) -> therefore Nervous(viki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Haily is feral. Sylvester is limacine. Lazarus is bored. Phip is umteen. Blue things are fashioned. If something is umteen then it is feral. If something is fashioned then it is limacine. If Haily is profound and Haily is fashioned then Haily is limacine. If Sylvester is inspired and Sylvester is umteen then Sylvester is fashioned. Round things are profound. All limacine, feral things are inspired. All fashioned things are profound. Haily is limacine.", "logic": "\nFeral(haily)\nLimacine(sylvester)\nBored(lazarus)\nUmteen(phip)\nforall x (Feral(x) -> Fashioned(x))\nforall x (Umteen(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Fashioned(x) -> Limacine(x))\nProfound(haily) and Fashioned(haily) -> Limacine(haily)\nInspired(sylvester) and Umteen(sylvester) -> Fashioned(sylvester)\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> Profound(x))\nforall x (Limacine(x) and Feral(x) -> Inspired(x))\nforall x (Fashioned(x) -> Profound(x))\n\nLimacine(haily)\n\nFeral(haily) and forall x (Feral(x) -> Fashioned(x)) -> therefore Fashioned(haily) Fashioned(haily) and forall x (Fashioned(x) -> Limacine(x)) -> therefore Limacine(haily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Hiralal is waxed. Delcine is overhanded. Goose is mnemonic. Ephrayim is inapposite. Blue things are slimed. If something is inapposite then it is waxed. If something is slimed then it is overhanded. If Hiralal is fatty and Hiralal is slimed then Hiralal is overhanded. If Delcine is annual and Delcine is inapposite then Delcine is slimed. Round things are fatty. All overhanded, waxed things are annual. All slimed things are fatty. Hiralal is not fatty.", "logic": "\nWaxed(hiralal)\nOverhanded(delcine)\nMnemonic(goose)\nInapposite(ephrayim)\nforall x (Waxed(x) -> Slimed(x))\nforall x (Inapposite(x) -> Waxed(x))\nforall x (Slimed(x) -> Overhanded(x))\nFatty(hiralal) and Slimed(hiralal) -> Overhanded(hiralal)\nAnnual(delcine) and Inapposite(delcine) -> Slimed(delcine)\nforall x (Annual(x) -> Fatty(x))\nforall x (Overhanded(x) and Waxed(x) -> Annual(x))\nforall x (Slimed(x) -> Fatty(x))\n\nnot Fatty(hiralal)\n\nWaxed(hiralal) and forall x (Waxed(x) -> Slimed(x)) -> therefore Slimed(hiralal) Slimed(hiralal) and forall x (Slimed(x) -> Fatty(x)) -> therefore Fatty(hiralal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Seka is anatropous. Blondie is prompt. Nomi is anopheline. Elbertine is mucous. Blue things are fetching. If something is mucous then it is anatropous. If something is fetching then it is prompt. If Seka is glabellar and Seka is fetching then Seka is prompt. If Blondie is cabalistic and Blondie is mucous then Blondie is fetching. Round things are glabellar. All prompt, anatropous things are cabalistic. All fetching things are glabellar. Elbertine is glabellar.", "logic": "\nAnatropous(seka)\nPrompt(blondie)\nAnopheline(nomi)\nMucous(elbertine)\nforall x (Anatropous(x) -> Fetching(x))\nforall x (Mucous(x) -> Anatropous(x))\nforall x (Fetching(x) -> Prompt(x))\nGlabellar(seka) and Fetching(seka) -> Prompt(seka)\nCabalistic(blondie) and Mucous(blondie) -> Fetching(blondie)\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) -> Glabellar(x))\nforall x (Prompt(x) and Anatropous(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Fetching(x) -> Glabellar(x))\n\nGlabellar(elbertine)\n\nMucous(elbertine) and forall x (Mucous(x) -> Anatropous(x)) -> therefore Anatropous(elbertine) Anatropous(elbertine) and forall x (Anatropous(x) -> Fetching(x)) -> therefore Fetching(elbertine) Fetching(elbertine) and forall x (Fetching(x) -> Glabellar(x)) -> therefore Glabellar(elbertine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Kitty is asserted. Blanche is coreferent. Gustaf is orwellian. Caren is innovative. Blue things are botswanan. If something is innovative then it is asserted. If something is botswanan then it is coreferent. If Kitty is theist and Kitty is botswanan then Kitty is coreferent. If Blanche is slangy and Blanche is innovative then Blanche is botswanan. Round things are theist. All coreferent, asserted things are slangy. All botswanan things are theist. Caren is not theist.", "logic": "\nAsserted(kitty)\nCoreferent(blanche)\nOrwellian(gustaf)\nInnovative(caren)\nforall x (Asserted(x) -> Botswanan(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) -> Asserted(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Coreferent(x))\nTheist(kitty) and Botswanan(kitty) -> Coreferent(kitty)\nSlangy(blanche) and Innovative(blanche) -> Botswanan(blanche)\nforall x (Slangy(x) -> Theist(x))\nforall x (Coreferent(x) and Asserted(x) -> Slangy(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Theist(x))\n\nnot Theist(caren)\n\nInnovative(caren) and forall x (Innovative(x) -> Asserted(x)) -> therefore Asserted(caren) Asserted(caren) and forall x (Asserted(x) -> Botswanan(x)) -> therefore Botswanan(caren) Botswanan(caren) and forall x (Botswanan(x) -> Theist(x)) -> therefore Theist(caren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Roland is inchoative. Garcon is color. Iggy is stirring. Karlyn is prodigal. Blue things are wheeled. If something is prodigal then it is inchoative. If something is wheeled then it is color. If Roland is rayless and Roland is wheeled then Roland is color. If Garcon is thrillful and Garcon is prodigal then Garcon is wheeled. Round things are rayless. All color, inchoative things are thrillful. All wheeled things are rayless. Iggy is not inchoative.", "logic": "\nInchoative(roland)\nColor(garcon)\nStirring(iggy)\nProdigal(karlyn)\nforall x (Inchoative(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Inchoative(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Color(x))\nRayless(roland) and Wheeled(roland) -> Color(roland)\nThrillful(garcon) and Prodigal(garcon) -> Wheeled(garcon)\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Color(x) and Inchoative(x) -> Thrillful(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Rayless(x))\n\nnot Inchoative(iggy)\n\nforall x (Prodigal(x) -> Inchoative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Vachel is maleficent. Armstrong is brumous. Buster is zymoid. Ladonna is unconfined. Blue things are ripened. If something is unconfined then it is maleficent. If something is ripened then it is brumous. If Vachel is over and Vachel is ripened then Vachel is brumous. If Armstrong is crusted and Armstrong is unconfined then Armstrong is ripened. Round things are over. All brumous, maleficent things are crusted. All ripened things are over. Buster is over.", "logic": "\nMaleficent(vachel)\nBrumous(armstrong)\nZymoid(buster)\nUnconfined(ladonna)\nforall x (Maleficent(x) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Unconfined(x) -> Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Brumous(x))\nOver(vachel) and Ripened(vachel) -> Brumous(vachel)\nCrusted(armstrong) and Unconfined(armstrong) -> Ripened(armstrong)\nforall x (Crusted(x) -> Over(x))\nforall x (Brumous(x) and Maleficent(x) -> Crusted(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Over(x))\n\nOver(buster)\n\nforall x (Crusted(x) -> Over(x)) <- forall x (Brumous(x) and Maleficent(x) -> Crusted(x)) <- forall x (Unconfined(x) -> Maleficent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Silvester is leering. Mindy is floaty. Krissy is pointed. Ivett is scratchy. Blue things are caesarean. If something is scratchy then it is leering. If something is caesarean then it is floaty. If Silvester is mishnaic and Silvester is caesarean then Silvester is floaty. If Mindy is virtual and Mindy is scratchy then Mindy is caesarean. Round things are mishnaic. All floaty, leering things are virtual. All caesarean things are mishnaic. Mindy is not leering.", "logic": "\nLeering(silvester)\nFloaty(mindy)\nPointed(krissy)\nScratchy(ivett)\nforall x (Leering(x) -> Caesarean(x))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) -> Leering(x))\nforall x (Caesarean(x) -> Floaty(x))\nMishnaic(silvester) and Caesarean(silvester) -> Floaty(silvester)\nVirtual(mindy) and Scratchy(mindy) -> Caesarean(mindy)\nforall x (Virtual(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Floaty(x) and Leering(x) -> Virtual(x))\nforall x (Caesarean(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\n\nnot Leering(mindy)\n\nforall x (Scratchy(x) -> Leering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Marnie is mucoidal. Lin is unwearying. Myrta is integrated. Tressa is raiseable. Blue things are petrifying. If something is raiseable then it is mucoidal. If something is petrifying then it is unwearying. If Marnie is shapeless and Marnie is petrifying then Marnie is unwearying. If Lin is unfathomed and Lin is raiseable then Lin is petrifying. Round things are shapeless. All unwearying, mucoidal things are unfathomed. All petrifying things are shapeless. Lin is shapeless.", "logic": "\nMucoidal(marnie)\nUnwearying(lin)\nIntegrated(myrta)\nRaiseable(tressa)\nforall x (Mucoidal(x) -> Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) -> Unwearying(x))\nShapeless(marnie) and Petrifying(marnie) -> Unwearying(marnie)\nUnfathomed(lin) and Raiseable(lin) -> Petrifying(lin)\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) and Mucoidal(x) -> Unfathomed(x))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) -> Shapeless(x))\n\nShapeless(lin)\n\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Shapeless(x)) <- forall x (Unwearying(x) and Mucoidal(x) -> Unfathomed(x)) <- forall x (Raiseable(x) -> Mucoidal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Mariette is mossy. Gaven is jacksonian. Edsel is cesarean. Pascal is sinitic. Blue things are romance. If something is sinitic then it is mossy. If something is romance then it is jacksonian. If Mariette is demure and Mariette is romance then Mariette is jacksonian. If Gaven is polish and Gaven is sinitic then Gaven is romance. Round things are demure. All jacksonian, mossy things are polish. All romance things are demure. Edsel is not sinitic.", "logic": "\nMossy(mariette)\nJacksonian(gaven)\nCesarean(edsel)\nSinitic(pascal)\nforall x (Mossy(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Mossy(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nDemure(mariette) and Romance(mariette) -> Jacksonian(mariette)\nPolish(gaven) and Sinitic(gaven) -> Romance(gaven)\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Demure(x))\nforall x (Jacksonian(x) and Mossy(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) -> Demure(x))\n\nnot Sinitic(edsel)\n\nnot Sinitic(edsel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Baron is phonic. Clyde is consumable. Fowler is oozing. Iago is unrivaled. Blue things are wrathful. If something is unrivaled then it is phonic. If something is wrathful then it is consumable. If Baron is ritenuto and Baron is wrathful then Baron is consumable. If Clyde is tiny and Clyde is unrivaled then Clyde is wrathful. Round things are ritenuto. All consumable, phonic things are tiny. All wrathful things are ritenuto. Clyde is oozing.", "logic": "\nPhonic(baron)\nConsumable(clyde)\nOozing(fowler)\nUnrivaled(iago)\nforall x (Phonic(x) -> Wrathful(x))\nforall x (Unrivaled(x) -> Phonic(x))\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> Consumable(x))\nRitenuto(baron) and Wrathful(baron) -> Consumable(baron)\nTiny(clyde) and Unrivaled(clyde) -> Wrathful(clyde)\nforall x (Tiny(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\nforall x (Consumable(x) and Phonic(x) -> Tiny(x))\nforall x (Wrathful(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\n\nOozing(clyde)\n\nOozing(clyde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Towny is togged. Rebekah is spangly. Kay is narcotised. Nitin is hydroxy. Blue things are foggy. If something is hydroxy then it is togged. If something is foggy then it is spangly. If Towny is enhanced and Towny is foggy then Towny is spangly. If Rebekah is viewable and Rebekah is hydroxy then Rebekah is foggy. Round things are enhanced. All spangly, togged things are viewable. All foggy things are enhanced. Rebekah is not hydroxy.", "logic": "\nTogged(towny)\nSpangly(rebekah)\nNarcotised(kay)\nHydroxy(nitin)\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Togged(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Spangly(x))\nEnhanced(towny) and Foggy(towny) -> Spangly(towny)\nViewable(rebekah) and Hydroxy(rebekah) -> Foggy(rebekah)\nforall x (Viewable(x) -> Enhanced(x))\nforall x (Spangly(x) and Togged(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Enhanced(x))\n\nnot Hydroxy(rebekah)\n\nnot Hydroxy(rebekah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Farica is immotile. Cordy is coated. Cacilia is resistant. Lawton is judicial. Blue things are intuitive. If something is judicial then it is immotile. If something is intuitive then it is coated. If Farica is untrue and Farica is intuitive then Farica is coated. If Cordy is discrepant and Cordy is judicial then Cordy is intuitive. Round things are untrue. All coated, immotile things are discrepant. All intuitive things are untrue. Farica is judicial.", "logic": "\nImmotile(farica)\nCoated(cordy)\nResistant(cacilia)\nJudicial(lawton)\nforall x (Immotile(x) -> Intuitive(x))\nforall x (Judicial(x) -> Immotile(x))\nforall x (Intuitive(x) -> Coated(x))\nUntrue(farica) and Intuitive(farica) -> Coated(farica)\nDiscrepant(cordy) and Judicial(cordy) -> Intuitive(cordy)\nforall x (Discrepant(x) -> Untrue(x))\nforall x (Coated(x) and Immotile(x) -> Discrepant(x))\nforall x (Intuitive(x) -> Untrue(x))\n\nJudicial(farica)\n\nJudicial(farica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-485"} {"premises": "Alina is denuded. Yancey is potable. Leilah is potable. Mureil is evanescent. All unrelieved people are denuded. If Leilah is denuded then Leilah is unrelieved. If someone is potable then they are evanescent. If Leilah is anadromous and Leilah is denuded then Leilah is geriatric. All brachial, evanescent people are anadromous. All potable people are unrelieved. White people are geriatric. If someone is unrelieved and anadromous then they are denuded. Alina is denuded.", "logic": "\nDenuded(alina)\nPotable(yancey)\nPotable(leilah)\nEvanescent(mureil)\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Denuded(x))\nDenuded(leilah) -> Unrelieved(leilah)\nforall x (Potable(x) -> Evanescent(x))\nAnadromous(leilah) and Denuded(leilah) -> Geriatric(leilah)\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Evanescent(x) -> Anadromous(x))\nforall x (Potable(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Geriatric(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) and Anadromous(x) -> Denuded(x))\n\nDenuded(alina)\n\ntherefore Denuded(alina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Jemmie is gluttonous. Barr is celluloid. Eve is celluloid. Wynny is expandable. All unsmiling people are gluttonous. If Eve is gluttonous then Eve is unsmiling. If someone is celluloid then they are expandable. If Eve is pilar and Eve is gluttonous then Eve is energizing. All sought, expandable people are pilar. All celluloid people are unsmiling. White people are energizing. If someone is unsmiling and pilar then they are gluttonous. Barr is not celluloid.", "logic": "\nGluttonous(jemmie)\nCelluloid(barr)\nCelluloid(eve)\nExpandable(wynny)\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nGluttonous(eve) -> Unsmiling(eve)\nforall x (Celluloid(x) -> Expandable(x))\nPilar(eve) and Gluttonous(eve) -> Energizing(eve)\nforall x (Sought(x) and Expandable(x) -> Pilar(x))\nforall x (Celluloid(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Energizing(x))\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and Pilar(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\n\nnot Celluloid(barr)\n\ntherefore Celluloid(barr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Mariam is effete. Farra is grating. Finley is grating. Hersh is meagerly. All side people are effete. If Finley is effete then Finley is side. If someone is grating then they are meagerly. If Finley is acceptable and Finley is effete then Finley is ownerless. All aperiodic, meagerly people are acceptable. All grating people are side. White people are ownerless. If someone is side and acceptable then they are effete. Farra is meagerly.", "logic": "\nEffete(mariam)\nGrating(farra)\nGrating(finley)\nMeagerly(hersh)\nforall x (Side(x) -> Effete(x))\nEffete(finley) -> Side(finley)\nforall x (Grating(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nAcceptable(finley) and Effete(finley) -> Ownerless(finley)\nforall x (Aperiodic(x) and Meagerly(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Grating(x) -> Side(x))\nforall x (Side(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Side(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Effete(x))\n\nMeagerly(farra)\n\nGrating(farra) and forall x (Grating(x) -> Meagerly(x)) -> therefore Meagerly(farra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Abram is anginal. Ajai is idempotent. Susan is idempotent. Goldarina is fleeceable. All ahorse people are anginal. If Susan is anginal then Susan is ahorse. If someone is idempotent then they are fleeceable. If Susan is evidential and Susan is anginal then Susan is dyspnoeal. All catabolic, fleeceable people are evidential. All idempotent people are ahorse. White people are dyspnoeal. If someone is ahorse and evidential then they are anginal. Susan is not ahorse.", "logic": "\nAnginal(abram)\nIdempotent(ajai)\nIdempotent(susan)\nFleeceable(goldarina)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Anginal(x))\nAnginal(susan) -> Ahorse(susan)\nforall x (Idempotent(x) -> Fleeceable(x))\nEvidential(susan) and Anginal(susan) -> Dyspnoeal(susan)\nforall x (Catabolic(x) and Fleeceable(x) -> Evidential(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Dyspnoeal(x))\nforall x (Ahorse(x) and Evidential(x) -> Anginal(x))\n\nnot Ahorse(susan)\n\nIdempotent(susan) and forall x (Idempotent(x) -> Ahorse(x)) -> therefore Ahorse(susan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Bren is corrupting. Ally is awed. Paula is awed. Ruperta is unsought. All remediable people are corrupting. If Paula is corrupting then Paula is remediable. If someone is awed then they are unsought. If Paula is analogical and Paula is corrupting then Paula is slushy. All capitalist, unsought people are analogical. All awed people are remediable. White people are slushy. If someone is remediable and analogical then they are corrupting. Paula is slushy.", "logic": "\nCorrupting(bren)\nAwed(ally)\nAwed(paula)\nUnsought(ruperta)\nforall x (Remediable(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nCorrupting(paula) -> Remediable(paula)\nforall x (Awed(x) -> Unsought(x))\nAnalogical(paula) and Corrupting(paula) -> Slushy(paula)\nforall x (Capitalist(x) and Unsought(x) -> Analogical(x))\nforall x (Awed(x) -> Remediable(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) -> Slushy(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) and Analogical(x) -> Corrupting(x))\n\nSlushy(paula)\n\nAwed(paula) and forall x (Awed(x) -> Remediable(x)) -> therefore Remediable(paula) Remediable(paula) and forall x (Remediable(x) -> Slushy(x)) -> therefore Slushy(paula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Hakim is bayesian. Shanie is wide. Marie is wide. Ginnifer is recumbent. All gluey people are bayesian. If Marie is bayesian then Marie is gluey. If someone is wide then they are recumbent. If Marie is frostian and Marie is bayesian then Marie is pent. All sinning, recumbent people are frostian. All wide people are gluey. White people are pent. If someone is gluey and frostian then they are bayesian. Marie is not bayesian.", "logic": "\nBayesian(hakim)\nWide(shanie)\nWide(marie)\nRecumbent(ginnifer)\nforall x (Gluey(x) -> Bayesian(x))\nBayesian(marie) -> Gluey(marie)\nforall x (Wide(x) -> Recumbent(x))\nFrostian(marie) and Bayesian(marie) -> Pent(marie)\nforall x (Sinning(x) and Recumbent(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Wide(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Gluey(x) -> Pent(x))\nforall x (Gluey(x) and Frostian(x) -> Bayesian(x))\n\nnot Bayesian(marie)\n\nWide(marie) and forall x (Wide(x) -> Gluey(x)) -> therefore Gluey(marie) Gluey(marie) and forall x (Gluey(x) -> Bayesian(x)) -> therefore Bayesian(marie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Cammy is talismanic. Stavros is frowsy. Lorena is frowsy. Waverley is punitive. All insanitary people are talismanic. If Lorena is talismanic then Lorena is insanitary. If someone is frowsy then they are punitive. If Lorena is matte and Lorena is talismanic then Lorena is husbandly. All narrowed, punitive people are matte. All frowsy people are insanitary. White people are husbandly. If someone is insanitary and matte then they are talismanic. Cammy is not punitive.", "logic": "\nTalismanic(cammy)\nFrowsy(stavros)\nFrowsy(lorena)\nPunitive(waverley)\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Talismanic(x))\nTalismanic(lorena) -> Insanitary(lorena)\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Punitive(x))\nMatte(lorena) and Talismanic(lorena) -> Husbandly(lorena)\nforall x (Narrowed(x) and Punitive(x) -> Matte(x))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Insanitary(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Husbandly(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Matte(x) -> Talismanic(x))\n\nnot Punitive(cammy)\n\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Punitive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Leonid is imminent. Coralyn is deducible. Esme is deducible. Dyane is incoming. All efficient people are imminent. If Esme is imminent then Esme is efficient. If someone is deducible then they are incoming. If Esme is melanesian and Esme is imminent then Esme is autotelic. All active, incoming people are melanesian. All deducible people are efficient. White people are autotelic. If someone is efficient and melanesian then they are imminent. Esme is melanesian.", "logic": "\nImminent(leonid)\nDeducible(coralyn)\nDeducible(esme)\nIncoming(dyane)\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> Imminent(x))\nImminent(esme) -> Efficient(esme)\nforall x (Deducible(x) -> Incoming(x))\nMelanesian(esme) and Imminent(esme) -> Autotelic(esme)\nforall x (Active(x) and Incoming(x) -> Melanesian(x))\nforall x (Deducible(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> Autotelic(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Melanesian(x) -> Imminent(x))\n\nMelanesian(esme)\n\nforall x (Active(x) and Incoming(x) -> Melanesian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Chickie is autotelic. Imelda is unstinting. Sofia is unstinting. Shawn is fazed. All homonymic people are autotelic. If Sofia is autotelic then Sofia is homonymic. If someone is unstinting then they are fazed. If Sofia is retroflex and Sofia is autotelic then Sofia is filar. All popliteal, fazed people are retroflex. All unstinting people are homonymic. White people are filar. If someone is homonymic and retroflex then they are autotelic. Shawn is not filar.", "logic": "\nAutotelic(chickie)\nUnstinting(imelda)\nUnstinting(sofia)\nFazed(shawn)\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> Autotelic(x))\nAutotelic(sofia) -> Homonymic(sofia)\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Fazed(x))\nRetroflex(sofia) and Autotelic(sofia) -> Filar(sofia)\nforall x (Popliteal(x) and Fazed(x) -> Retroflex(x))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Homonymic(x))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> Filar(x))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) and Retroflex(x) -> Autotelic(x))\n\nnot Filar(shawn)\n\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> Filar(x)) <- forall x (Unstinting(x) -> Homonymic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Charity is aeriferous. Abbi is tuxedoed. Cherry is tuxedoed. Bettine is south. All wideband people are aeriferous. If Cherry is aeriferous then Cherry is wideband. If someone is tuxedoed then they are south. If Cherry is spare and Cherry is aeriferous then Cherry is wishful. All headstrong, south people are spare. All tuxedoed people are wideband. White people are wishful. If someone is wideband and spare then they are aeriferous. Abbi is headstrong.", "logic": "\nAeriferous(charity)\nTuxedoed(abbi)\nTuxedoed(cherry)\nSouth(bettine)\nforall x (Wideband(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nAeriferous(cherry) -> Wideband(cherry)\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> South(x))\nSpare(cherry) and Aeriferous(cherry) -> Wishful(cherry)\nforall x (Headstrong(x) and South(x) -> Spare(x))\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) -> Wideband(x))\nforall x (Wideband(x) -> Wishful(x))\nforall x (Wideband(x) and Spare(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\n\nHeadstrong(abbi)\n\nHeadstrong(abbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Louella is canonised. Casia is bilinear. Eustacia is bilinear. Gerald is rightist. All ironshod people are canonised. If Eustacia is canonised then Eustacia is ironshod. If someone is bilinear then they are rightist. If Eustacia is amoebic and Eustacia is canonised then Eustacia is armorial. All accordant, rightist people are amoebic. All bilinear people are ironshod. White people are armorial. If someone is ironshod and amoebic then they are canonised. Eustacia is not accordant.", "logic": "\nCanonised(louella)\nBilinear(casia)\nBilinear(eustacia)\nRightist(gerald)\nforall x (Ironshod(x) -> Canonised(x))\nCanonised(eustacia) -> Ironshod(eustacia)\nforall x (Bilinear(x) -> Rightist(x))\nAmoebic(eustacia) and Canonised(eustacia) -> Armorial(eustacia)\nforall x (Accordant(x) and Rightist(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Bilinear(x) -> Ironshod(x))\nforall x (Ironshod(x) -> Armorial(x))\nforall x (Ironshod(x) and Amoebic(x) -> Canonised(x))\n\nnot Accordant(eustacia)\n\nnot Accordant(eustacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "Laurianne is nutty. Annamari is glossy. Johny is glossy. Thaddius is nonunion. All casuistic people are nutty. If Johny is nutty then Johny is casuistic. If someone is glossy then they are nonunion. If Johny is tensile and Johny is nutty then Johny is opportune. All impervious, nonunion people are tensile. All glossy people are casuistic. White people are opportune. If someone is casuistic and tensile then they are nutty. Thaddius is glossy.", "logic": "\nNutty(laurianne)\nGlossy(annamari)\nGlossy(johny)\nNonunion(thaddius)\nforall x (Casuistic(x) -> Nutty(x))\nNutty(johny) -> Casuistic(johny)\nforall x (Glossy(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nTensile(johny) and Nutty(johny) -> Opportune(johny)\nforall x (Impervious(x) and Nonunion(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Glossy(x) -> Casuistic(x))\nforall x (Casuistic(x) -> Opportune(x))\nforall x (Casuistic(x) and Tensile(x) -> Nutty(x))\n\nGlossy(thaddius)\n\nGlossy(thaddius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2107"} {"premises": "The torrin reverse the ciara. The torrin reverse the malvina. The torrin revoke the ciara. The torrin revoke the malvina. The ciara reverse the ardelia. The ciara is mixed. The malvina does not chase the torrin. The malvina reverse the ciara. The malvina motivate the ciara. The ardelia reverse the ciara. The ardelia revoke the ciara. The ardelia is mixed. The ardelia is not loco. The ardelia is peeled. The ardelia motivate the malvina. If something is mixed and it reverse the ciara then it reverse the malvina. The malvina does not chase the torrin.", "logic": "\nReverse(torrin, ciara)\nReverse(torrin, malvina)\nRevoke(torrin, ciara)\nRevoke(torrin, malvina)\nReverse(ciara, ardelia)\nMixed(ciara)\nnot Reverse(malvina, torrin)\nReverse(malvina, ciara)\nMotivate(malvina, ciara)\nReverse(ardelia, ciara)\nRevoke(ardelia, ciara)\nMixed(ardelia)\nnot Loco(ardelia)\nPeeled(ardelia)\nMotivate(ardelia, malvina)\nforall x (Mixed(x) and Reverse(x, ciara) -> Reverse(x, malvina))\n\nnot Reverse(malvina, torrin)\n\ntherefore not Reverse(malvina, torrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "The angele work the roxine. The angele work the lyda. The angele sink the roxine. The angele sink the lyda. The roxine work the perle. The roxine is homophile. The lyda does not chase the angele. The lyda work the roxine. The lyda scale the roxine. The perle work the roxine. The perle sink the roxine. The perle is homophile. The perle is not annular. The perle is attachable. The perle scale the lyda. If something is homophile and it work the roxine then it work the lyda. The roxine is not homophile.", "logic": "\nWork(angele, roxine)\nWork(angele, lyda)\nSink(angele, roxine)\nSink(angele, lyda)\nWork(roxine, perle)\nHomophile(roxine)\nnot Work(lyda, angele)\nWork(lyda, roxine)\nScale(lyda, roxine)\nWork(perle, roxine)\nSink(perle, roxine)\nHomophile(perle)\nnot Annular(perle)\nAttachable(perle)\nScale(perle, lyda)\nforall x (Homophile(x) and Work(x, roxine) -> Work(x, lyda))\n\nnot Homophile(roxine)\n\ntherefore Homophile(roxine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "The golda shirk the saudra. The golda shirk the marion. The golda burlesque the saudra. The golda burlesque the marion. The saudra shirk the mellie. The saudra is parvenu. The marion does not chase the golda. The marion shirk the saudra. The marion poleaxe the saudra. The mellie shirk the saudra. The mellie burlesque the saudra. The mellie is parvenu. The mellie is not cuprous. The mellie is liver. The mellie poleaxe the marion. If something is parvenu and it shirk the saudra then it shirk the marion. The mellie shirk the marion.", "logic": "\nShirk(golda, saudra)\nShirk(golda, marion)\nBurlesque(golda, saudra)\nBurlesque(golda, marion)\nShirk(saudra, mellie)\nParvenu(saudra)\nnot Shirk(marion, golda)\nShirk(marion, saudra)\nPoleaxe(marion, saudra)\nShirk(mellie, saudra)\nBurlesque(mellie, saudra)\nParvenu(mellie)\nnot Cuprous(mellie)\nLiver(mellie)\nPoleaxe(mellie, marion)\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and Shirk(x, saudra) -> Shirk(x, marion))\n\nShirk(mellie, marion)\n\nParvenu(mellie) and Shirk(mellie, saudra) and forall x (Parvenu(x) and Shirk(x, saudra) -> Shirk(x, marion)) -> therefore Shirk(mellie, marion)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "The nahum repurchase the matt. The nahum repurchase the maudie. The nahum crimson the matt. The nahum crimson the maudie. The matt repurchase the blare. The matt is binomial. The maudie does not chase the nahum. The maudie repurchase the matt. The maudie focus the matt. The blare repurchase the matt. The blare crimson the matt. The blare is binomial. The blare is not pupal. The blare is unproved. The blare focus the maudie. If something is binomial and it repurchase the matt then it repurchase the maudie. The blare does not chase the maudie.", "logic": "\nRepurchase(nahum, matt)\nRepurchase(nahum, maudie)\nCrimson(nahum, matt)\nCrimson(nahum, maudie)\nRepurchase(matt, blare)\nBinomial(matt)\nnot Repurchase(maudie, nahum)\nRepurchase(maudie, matt)\nFocus(maudie, matt)\nRepurchase(blare, matt)\nCrimson(blare, matt)\nBinomial(blare)\nnot Pupal(blare)\nUnproved(blare)\nFocus(blare, maudie)\nforall x (Binomial(x) and Repurchase(x, matt) -> Repurchase(x, maudie))\n\nnot Repurchase(blare, maudie)\n\nBinomial(blare) and Repurchase(blare, matt) and forall x (Binomial(x) and Repurchase(x, matt) -> Repurchase(x, maudie)) -> therefore Repurchase(blare, maudie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "The linzy accomplish the shaylyn. The linzy accomplish the yanaton. The linzy clog the shaylyn. The linzy clog the yanaton. The shaylyn accomplish the cordy. The shaylyn is pocked. The yanaton does not chase the linzy. The yanaton accomplish the shaylyn. The yanaton mother the shaylyn. The cordy accomplish the shaylyn. The cordy clog the shaylyn. The cordy is pocked. The cordy is not unisexual. The cordy is bombastic. The cordy mother the yanaton. If something is pocked and it accomplish the shaylyn then it accomplish the yanaton. The yanaton does not chase the yanaton.", "logic": "\nAccomplish(linzy, shaylyn)\nAccomplish(linzy, yanaton)\nClog(linzy, shaylyn)\nClog(linzy, yanaton)\nAccomplish(shaylyn, cordy)\nPocked(shaylyn)\nnot Accomplish(yanaton, linzy)\nAccomplish(yanaton, shaylyn)\nMother(yanaton, shaylyn)\nAccomplish(cordy, shaylyn)\nClog(cordy, shaylyn)\nPocked(cordy)\nnot Unisexual(cordy)\nBombastic(cordy)\nMother(cordy, yanaton)\nforall x (Pocked(x) and Accomplish(x, shaylyn) -> Accomplish(x, yanaton))\n\nnot Accomplish(yanaton, yanaton)\n\nforall x (Pocked(x) and Accomplish(x, shaylyn) -> Accomplish(x, yanaton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "The nicoli parboil the enya. The nicoli parboil the noelle. The nicoli sliver the enya. The nicoli sliver the noelle. The enya parboil the raine. The enya is protecting. The noelle does not chase the nicoli. The noelle parboil the enya. The noelle convect the enya. The raine parboil the enya. The raine sliver the enya. The raine is protecting. The raine is not erring. The raine is honored. The raine convect the noelle. If something is protecting and it parboil the enya then it parboil the noelle. The enya parboil the noelle.", "logic": "\nParboil(nicoli, enya)\nParboil(nicoli, noelle)\nSliver(nicoli, enya)\nSliver(nicoli, noelle)\nParboil(enya, raine)\nProtecting(enya)\nnot Parboil(noelle, nicoli)\nParboil(noelle, enya)\nConvect(noelle, enya)\nParboil(raine, enya)\nSliver(raine, enya)\nProtecting(raine)\nnot Erring(raine)\nHonored(raine)\nConvect(raine, noelle)\nforall x (Protecting(x) and Parboil(x, enya) -> Parboil(x, noelle))\n\nParboil(enya, noelle)\n\nforall x (Protecting(x) and Parboil(x, enya) -> Parboil(x, noelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "The ellette enforce the goddard. The ellette enforce the myrah. The ellette stay the goddard. The ellette stay the myrah. The goddard enforce the rudy. The goddard is bimodal. The myrah does not chase the ellette. The myrah enforce the goddard. The myrah tremor the goddard. The rudy enforce the goddard. The rudy stay the goddard. The rudy is bimodal. The rudy is not unfledged. The rudy is unpopular. The rudy tremor the myrah. If something is bimodal and it enforce the goddard then it enforce the myrah. The goddard does not visit the ellette.", "logic": "\nEnforce(ellette, goddard)\nEnforce(ellette, myrah)\nStay(ellette, goddard)\nStay(ellette, myrah)\nEnforce(goddard, rudy)\nBimodal(goddard)\nnot Enforce(myrah, ellette)\nEnforce(myrah, goddard)\nTremor(myrah, goddard)\nEnforce(rudy, goddard)\nStay(rudy, goddard)\nBimodal(rudy)\nnot Unfledged(rudy)\nUnpopular(rudy)\nTremor(rudy, myrah)\nforall x (Bimodal(x) and Enforce(x, goddard) -> Enforce(x, myrah))\n\nnot Tremor(goddard, ellette)\n\nnot Tremor(goddard, ellette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "The gretal hunker the pansy. The gretal hunker the eda. The gretal focalize the pansy. The gretal focalize the eda. The pansy hunker the edyth. The pansy is xxiii. The eda does not chase the gretal. The eda hunker the pansy. The eda landscape the pansy. The edyth hunker the pansy. The edyth focalize the pansy. The edyth is xxiii. The edyth is not bituminoid. The edyth is esthetic. The edyth landscape the eda. If something is xxiii and it hunker the pansy then it hunker the eda. The pansy landscape the edyth.", "logic": "\nHunker(gretal, pansy)\nHunker(gretal, eda)\nFocalize(gretal, pansy)\nFocalize(gretal, eda)\nHunker(pansy, edyth)\nXxiii(pansy)\nnot Hunker(eda, gretal)\nHunker(eda, pansy)\nLandscape(eda, pansy)\nHunker(edyth, pansy)\nFocalize(edyth, pansy)\nXxiii(edyth)\nnot Bituminoid(edyth)\nEsthetic(edyth)\nLandscape(edyth, eda)\nforall x (Xxiii(x) and Hunker(x, pansy) -> Hunker(x, eda))\n\nLandscape(pansy, edyth)\n\nLandscape(pansy, edyth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-633"} {"premises": "Phyllis is nethermost. Phyllis is infeasible. Phyllis is mortgaged. Phyllis is reductive. Phyllis is windblown. Phyllis is inbred. Phyllis is expensive. Bennett is infeasible. Bennett is mortgaged. Bennett is inbred. Madel is nethermost. Madel is infeasible. Madel is mortgaged. Madel is reductive. Madel is windblown. Big, infeasible things are mortgaged. If Bennett is reductive then Bennett is windblown. If something is nethermost and reductive then it is infeasible. If something is expensive then it is mortgaged. If Madel is inbred then Madel is windblown. If something is reductive then it is mortgaged. Phyllis is expensive.", "logic": "\nNethermost(phyllis)\nInfeasible(phyllis)\nMortgaged(phyllis)\nReductive(phyllis)\nWindblown(phyllis)\nInbred(phyllis)\nExpensive(phyllis)\nInfeasible(bennett)\nMortgaged(bennett)\nInbred(bennett)\nNethermost(madel)\nInfeasible(madel)\nMortgaged(madel)\nReductive(madel)\nWindblown(madel)\nforall x (Nethermost(x) and Infeasible(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nReductive(bennett) -> Windblown(bennett)\nforall x (Nethermost(x) and Reductive(x) -> Infeasible(x))\nforall x (Expensive(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\nInbred(madel) -> Windblown(madel)\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Mortgaged(x))\n\nExpensive(phyllis)\n\ntherefore Expensive(phyllis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "Doro is planar. Doro is slanderous. Doro is sketchy. Doro is isoclinic. Doro is fearful. Doro is stemmatic. Doro is canadian. Halie is slanderous. Halie is sketchy. Halie is stemmatic. Gennie is planar. Gennie is slanderous. Gennie is sketchy. Gennie is isoclinic. Gennie is fearful. Big, slanderous things are sketchy. If Halie is isoclinic then Halie is fearful. If something is planar and isoclinic then it is slanderous. If something is canadian then it is sketchy. If Gennie is stemmatic then Gennie is fearful. If something is isoclinic then it is sketchy. Halie is not sketchy.", "logic": "\nPlanar(doro)\nSlanderous(doro)\nSketchy(doro)\nIsoclinic(doro)\nFearful(doro)\nStemmatic(doro)\nCanadian(doro)\nSlanderous(halie)\nSketchy(halie)\nStemmatic(halie)\nPlanar(gennie)\nSlanderous(gennie)\nSketchy(gennie)\nIsoclinic(gennie)\nFearful(gennie)\nforall x (Planar(x) and Slanderous(x) -> Sketchy(x))\nIsoclinic(halie) -> Fearful(halie)\nforall x (Planar(x) and Isoclinic(x) -> Slanderous(x))\nforall x (Canadian(x) -> Sketchy(x))\nStemmatic(gennie) -> Fearful(gennie)\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Sketchy(x))\n\nnot Sketchy(halie)\n\ntherefore Sketchy(halie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "Remington is passant. Remington is soulless. Remington is plentiful. Remington is homegrown. Remington is hectic. Remington is bewitched. Remington is zestful. Billi is soulless. Billi is plentiful. Billi is bewitched. Nevsa is passant. Nevsa is soulless. Nevsa is plentiful. Nevsa is homegrown. Nevsa is hectic. Big, soulless things are plentiful. If Billi is homegrown then Billi is hectic. If something is passant and homegrown then it is soulless. If something is zestful then it is plentiful. If Nevsa is bewitched then Nevsa is hectic. If something is homegrown then it is plentiful. Billi is not hectic.", "logic": "\nPassant(remington)\nSoulless(remington)\nPlentiful(remington)\nHomegrown(remington)\nHectic(remington)\nBewitched(remington)\nZestful(remington)\nSoulless(billi)\nPlentiful(billi)\nBewitched(billi)\nPassant(nevsa)\nSoulless(nevsa)\nPlentiful(nevsa)\nHomegrown(nevsa)\nHectic(nevsa)\nforall x (Passant(x) and Soulless(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nHomegrown(billi) -> Hectic(billi)\nforall x (Passant(x) and Homegrown(x) -> Soulless(x))\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nBewitched(nevsa) -> Hectic(nevsa)\nforall x (Homegrown(x) -> Plentiful(x))\n\nnot Hectic(billi)\n\nHomegrown(billi) -> Hectic(billi) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "Storm is cassocked. Storm is milky. Storm is lamblike. Storm is profaned. Storm is regenerate. Storm is lyric. Storm is renewable. Bunnie is milky. Bunnie is lamblike. Bunnie is lyric. Trude is cassocked. Trude is milky. Trude is lamblike. Trude is profaned. Trude is regenerate. Big, milky things are lamblike. If Bunnie is profaned then Bunnie is regenerate. If something is cassocked and profaned then it is milky. If something is renewable then it is lamblike. If Trude is lyric then Trude is regenerate. If something is profaned then it is lamblike. Bunnie is cassocked.", "logic": "\nCassocked(storm)\nMilky(storm)\nLamblike(storm)\nProfaned(storm)\nRegenerate(storm)\nLyric(storm)\nRenewable(storm)\nMilky(bunnie)\nLamblike(bunnie)\nLyric(bunnie)\nCassocked(trude)\nMilky(trude)\nLamblike(trude)\nProfaned(trude)\nRegenerate(trude)\nforall x (Cassocked(x) and Milky(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nProfaned(bunnie) -> Regenerate(bunnie)\nforall x (Cassocked(x) and Profaned(x) -> Milky(x))\nforall x (Renewable(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nLyric(trude) -> Regenerate(trude)\nforall x (Profaned(x) -> Lamblike(x))\n\nCassocked(bunnie)\n\nCassocked(bunnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "The elnore is sidereal. The talya stray the marilin. The marilin is tittering. If something starve the talya then the talya starve the marilin. If the elnore starve the marilin and the marilin starve the talya then the talya is handwoven. If something stray the marilin then it starve the talya. If something starve the marilin then it is gettable. If something stray the elnore and it starve the talya then it is tittering. If something stray the talya then the talya freeze the elnore. The elnore is sidereal.", "logic": "\nSidereal(elnore)\nStray(talya, marilin)\nTittering(marilin)\nforall x (Starve(x, talya) -> Starve(talya, marilin))\nStarve(elnore, marilin) and Starve(marilin, talya) -> Handwoven(talya)\nforall x (Stray(x, marilin) -> Starve(x, talya))\nforall x (Starve(x, marilin) -> Gettable(x))\nforall x (Stray(x, elnore) and Starve(x, talya) -> Tittering(x))\nforall x (Stray(x, talya) -> Freeze(talya, elnore))\n\nSidereal(elnore)\n\ntherefore Sidereal(elnore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The monte is unexplored. The jami indent the allianora. The allianora is economic. If something vandalize the jami then the jami vandalize the allianora. If the monte vandalize the allianora and the allianora vandalize the jami then the jami is matronly. If something indent the allianora then it vandalize the jami. If something vandalize the allianora then it is hmong. If something indent the monte and it vandalize the jami then it is economic. If something indent the jami then the jami wrench the monte. The jami does not like the allianora.", "logic": "\nUnexplored(monte)\nIndent(jami, allianora)\nEconomic(allianora)\nforall x (Vandalize(x, jami) -> Vandalize(jami, allianora))\nVandalize(monte, allianora) and Vandalize(allianora, jami) -> Matronly(jami)\nforall x (Indent(x, allianora) -> Vandalize(x, jami))\nforall x (Vandalize(x, allianora) -> Hmong(x))\nforall x (Indent(x, monte) and Vandalize(x, jami) -> Economic(x))\nforall x (Indent(x, jami) -> Wrench(jami, monte))\n\nnot Indent(jami, allianora)\n\ntherefore Indent(jami, allianora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The cassondra is illative. The lida stripe the alida. The alida is cycloid. If something centre the lida then the lida centre the alida. If the cassondra centre the alida and the alida centre the lida then the lida is prescribed. If something stripe the alida then it centre the lida. If something centre the alida then it is flukey. If something stripe the cassondra and it centre the lida then it is cycloid. If something stripe the lida then the lida venture the cassondra. The lida centre the lida.", "logic": "\nIllative(cassondra)\nStripe(lida, alida)\nCycloid(alida)\nforall x (Centre(x, lida) -> Centre(lida, alida))\nCentre(cassondra, alida) and Centre(alida, lida) -> Prescribed(lida)\nforall x (Stripe(x, alida) -> Centre(x, lida))\nforall x (Centre(x, alida) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Stripe(x, cassondra) and Centre(x, lida) -> Cycloid(x))\nforall x (Stripe(x, lida) -> Venture(lida, cassondra))\n\nCentre(lida, lida)\n\nStripe(lida, alida) and forall x (Stripe(x, alida) -> Centre(x, lida)) -> therefore Centre(lida, lida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The rafaelia is creaky. The danie aestivate the caro. The caro is roast. If something stiffen the danie then the danie stiffen the caro. If the rafaelia stiffen the caro and the caro stiffen the danie then the danie is greased. If something aestivate the caro then it stiffen the danie. If something stiffen the caro then it is delineate. If something aestivate the rafaelia and it stiffen the danie then it is roast. If something aestivate the danie then the danie perpetrate the rafaelia. The danie does not eat the danie.", "logic": "\nCreaky(rafaelia)\nAestivate(danie, caro)\nRoast(caro)\nforall x (Stiffen(x, danie) -> Stiffen(danie, caro))\nStiffen(rafaelia, caro) and Stiffen(caro, danie) -> Greased(danie)\nforall x (Aestivate(x, caro) -> Stiffen(x, danie))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, caro) -> Delineate(x))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, rafaelia) and Stiffen(x, danie) -> Roast(x))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, danie) -> Perpetrate(danie, rafaelia))\n\nnot Stiffen(danie, danie)\n\nAestivate(danie, caro) and forall x (Aestivate(x, caro) -> Stiffen(x, danie)) -> therefore Stiffen(danie, danie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The marcos is bungling. The zaria furbish the enid. The enid is affecting. If something glow the zaria then the zaria glow the enid. If the marcos glow the enid and the enid glow the zaria then the zaria is ivied. If something furbish the enid then it glow the zaria. If something glow the enid then it is pictorial. If something furbish the marcos and it glow the zaria then it is affecting. If something furbish the zaria then the zaria pertain the marcos. The zaria glow the enid.", "logic": "\nBungling(marcos)\nFurbish(zaria, enid)\nAffecting(enid)\nforall x (Glow(x, zaria) -> Glow(zaria, enid))\nGlow(marcos, enid) and Glow(enid, zaria) -> Ivied(zaria)\nforall x (Furbish(x, enid) -> Glow(x, zaria))\nforall x (Glow(x, enid) -> Pictorial(x))\nforall x (Furbish(x, marcos) and Glow(x, zaria) -> Affecting(x))\nforall x (Furbish(x, zaria) -> Pertain(zaria, marcos))\n\nGlow(zaria, enid)\n\nFurbish(zaria, enid) and forall x (Furbish(x, enid) -> Glow(x, zaria)) -> therefore Glow(zaria, zaria) Glow(zaria, zaria) and forall x (Glow(x, zaria) -> Glow(zaria, enid)) -> therefore Glow(zaria, enid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The elane is splay. The lorene enamour the thacher. The thacher is anecdotic. If something solemnise the lorene then the lorene solemnise the thacher. If the elane solemnise the thacher and the thacher solemnise the lorene then the lorene is auriform. If something enamour the thacher then it solemnise the lorene. If something solemnise the thacher then it is grayish. If something enamour the elane and it solemnise the lorene then it is anecdotic. If something enamour the lorene then the lorene retell the elane. The lorene does not eat the thacher.", "logic": "\nSplay(elane)\nEnamour(lorene, thacher)\nAnecdotic(thacher)\nforall x (Solemnise(x, lorene) -> Solemnise(lorene, thacher))\nSolemnise(elane, thacher) and Solemnise(thacher, lorene) -> Auriform(lorene)\nforall x (Enamour(x, thacher) -> Solemnise(x, lorene))\nforall x (Solemnise(x, thacher) -> Grayish(x))\nforall x (Enamour(x, elane) and Solemnise(x, lorene) -> Anecdotic(x))\nforall x (Enamour(x, lorene) -> Retell(lorene, elane))\n\nnot Solemnise(lorene, thacher)\n\nEnamour(lorene, thacher) and forall x (Enamour(x, thacher) -> Solemnise(x, lorene)) -> therefore Solemnise(lorene, lorene) Solemnise(lorene, lorene) and forall x (Solemnise(x, lorene) -> Solemnise(lorene, thacher)) -> therefore Solemnise(lorene, thacher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The ulric is roumanian. The cassy thrombose the heide. The heide is leafed. If something avoid the cassy then the cassy avoid the heide. If the ulric avoid the heide and the heide avoid the cassy then the cassy is emasculate. If something thrombose the heide then it avoid the cassy. If something avoid the heide then it is nursed. If something thrombose the ulric and it avoid the cassy then it is leafed. If something thrombose the cassy then the cassy hopple the ulric. The cassy is nursed.", "logic": "\nRoumanian(ulric)\nThrombose(cassy, heide)\nLeafed(heide)\nforall x (Avoid(x, cassy) -> Avoid(cassy, heide))\nAvoid(ulric, heide) and Avoid(heide, cassy) -> Emasculate(cassy)\nforall x (Thrombose(x, heide) -> Avoid(x, cassy))\nforall x (Avoid(x, heide) -> Nursed(x))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, ulric) and Avoid(x, cassy) -> Leafed(x))\nforall x (Thrombose(x, cassy) -> Hopple(cassy, ulric))\n\nNursed(cassy)\n\nThrombose(cassy, heide) and forall x (Thrombose(x, heide) -> Avoid(x, cassy)) -> therefore Avoid(cassy, cassy) Avoid(cassy, cassy) and forall x (Avoid(x, cassy) -> Avoid(cassy, heide)) -> therefore Avoid(cassy, heide) Avoid(cassy, heide) and forall x (Avoid(x, heide) -> Nursed(x)) -> therefore Nursed(cassy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The candra is peeved. The adolphe remould the janenna. The janenna is correlate. If something probate the adolphe then the adolphe probate the janenna. If the candra probate the janenna and the janenna probate the adolphe then the adolphe is icebound. If something remould the janenna then it probate the adolphe. If something probate the janenna then it is estimable. If something remould the candra and it probate the adolphe then it is correlate. If something remould the adolphe then the adolphe syllabise the candra. The adolphe is not estimable.", "logic": "\nPeeved(candra)\nRemould(adolphe, janenna)\nCorrelate(janenna)\nforall x (Probate(x, adolphe) -> Probate(adolphe, janenna))\nProbate(candra, janenna) and Probate(janenna, adolphe) -> Icebound(adolphe)\nforall x (Remould(x, janenna) -> Probate(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Probate(x, janenna) -> Estimable(x))\nforall x (Remould(x, candra) and Probate(x, adolphe) -> Correlate(x))\nforall x (Remould(x, adolphe) -> Syllabise(adolphe, candra))\n\nnot Estimable(adolphe)\n\nRemould(adolphe, janenna) and forall x (Remould(x, janenna) -> Probate(x, adolphe)) -> therefore Probate(adolphe, adolphe) Probate(adolphe, adolphe) and forall x (Probate(x, adolphe) -> Probate(adolphe, janenna)) -> therefore Probate(adolphe, janenna) Probate(adolphe, janenna) and forall x (Probate(x, janenna) -> Estimable(x)) -> therefore Estimable(adolphe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The gertie is pale. The tandie correlate the clementia. The clementia is cosy. If something overload the tandie then the tandie overload the clementia. If the gertie overload the clementia and the clementia overload the tandie then the tandie is eudemonic. If something correlate the clementia then it overload the tandie. If something overload the clementia then it is unloved. If something correlate the gertie and it overload the tandie then it is cosy. If something correlate the tandie then the tandie spangle the gertie. The gertie does not eat the tandie.", "logic": "\nPale(gertie)\nCorrelate(tandie, clementia)\nCosy(clementia)\nforall x (Overload(x, tandie) -> Overload(tandie, clementia))\nOverload(gertie, clementia) and Overload(clementia, tandie) -> Eudemonic(tandie)\nforall x (Correlate(x, clementia) -> Overload(x, tandie))\nforall x (Overload(x, clementia) -> Unloved(x))\nforall x (Correlate(x, gertie) and Overload(x, tandie) -> Cosy(x))\nforall x (Correlate(x, tandie) -> Spangle(tandie, gertie))\n\nnot Overload(gertie, tandie)\n\nforall x (Correlate(x, clementia) -> Overload(x, tandie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The brett is accustomed. The douglass overdrive the malissia. The malissia is adscript. If something agree the douglass then the douglass agree the malissia. If the brett agree the malissia and the malissia agree the douglass then the douglass is discursive. If something overdrive the malissia then it agree the douglass. If something agree the malissia then it is twilled. If something overdrive the brett and it agree the douglass then it is adscript. If something overdrive the douglass then the douglass dawdle the brett. The douglass dawdle the brett.", "logic": "\nAccustomed(brett)\nOverdrive(douglass, malissia)\nAdscript(malissia)\nforall x (Agree(x, douglass) -> Agree(douglass, malissia))\nAgree(brett, malissia) and Agree(malissia, douglass) -> Discursive(douglass)\nforall x (Overdrive(x, malissia) -> Agree(x, douglass))\nforall x (Agree(x, malissia) -> Twilled(x))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, brett) and Agree(x, douglass) -> Adscript(x))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, douglass) -> Dawdle(douglass, brett))\n\nDawdle(douglass, brett)\n\nforall x (Overdrive(x, douglass) -> Dawdle(douglass, brett)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The jessey is homing. The hilbert refinance the hetty. The hetty is despoiled. If something ascertain the hilbert then the hilbert ascertain the hetty. If the jessey ascertain the hetty and the hetty ascertain the hilbert then the hilbert is unparallel. If something refinance the hetty then it ascertain the hilbert. If something ascertain the hetty then it is esteemed. If something refinance the jessey and it ascertain the hilbert then it is despoiled. If something refinance the hilbert then the hilbert whip the jessey. The jessey is not esteemed.", "logic": "\nHoming(jessey)\nRefinance(hilbert, hetty)\nDespoiled(hetty)\nforall x (Ascertain(x, hilbert) -> Ascertain(hilbert, hetty))\nAscertain(jessey, hetty) and Ascertain(hetty, hilbert) -> Unparallel(hilbert)\nforall x (Refinance(x, hetty) -> Ascertain(x, hilbert))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, hetty) -> Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Refinance(x, jessey) and Ascertain(x, hilbert) -> Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Refinance(x, hilbert) -> Whip(hilbert, jessey))\n\nnot Esteemed(jessey)\n\nforall x (Ascertain(x, hetty) -> Esteemed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The dyana is amphoteric. The nahum drop the micheil. The micheil is colourless. If something suffice the nahum then the nahum suffice the micheil. If the dyana suffice the micheil and the micheil suffice the nahum then the nahum is nonionized. If something drop the micheil then it suffice the nahum. If something suffice the micheil then it is notorious. If something drop the dyana and it suffice the nahum then it is colourless. If something drop the nahum then the nahum distend the dyana. The nahum is nonionized.", "logic": "\nAmphoteric(dyana)\nDrop(nahum, micheil)\nColourless(micheil)\nforall x (Suffice(x, nahum) -> Suffice(nahum, micheil))\nSuffice(dyana, micheil) and Suffice(micheil, nahum) -> Nonionized(nahum)\nforall x (Drop(x, micheil) -> Suffice(x, nahum))\nforall x (Suffice(x, micheil) -> Notorious(x))\nforall x (Drop(x, dyana) and Suffice(x, nahum) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Drop(x, nahum) -> Distend(nahum, dyana))\n\nNonionized(nahum)\n\nSuffice(dyana, micheil) and Suffice(micheil, nahum) -> Nonionized(nahum) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The barry is gleeful. The alecia rouse the jeralee. The jeralee is abdominous. If something temper the alecia then the alecia temper the jeralee. If the barry temper the jeralee and the jeralee temper the alecia then the alecia is regal. If something rouse the jeralee then it temper the alecia. If something temper the jeralee then it is indie. If something rouse the barry and it temper the alecia then it is abdominous. If something rouse the alecia then the alecia impanel the barry. The barry does not like the alecia.", "logic": "\nGleeful(barry)\nRouse(alecia, jeralee)\nAbdominous(jeralee)\nforall x (Temper(x, alecia) -> Temper(alecia, jeralee))\nTemper(barry, jeralee) and Temper(jeralee, alecia) -> Regal(alecia)\nforall x (Rouse(x, jeralee) -> Temper(x, alecia))\nforall x (Temper(x, jeralee) -> Indie(x))\nforall x (Rouse(x, barry) and Temper(x, alecia) -> Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Rouse(x, alecia) -> Impanel(alecia, barry))\n\nnot Rouse(barry, alecia)\n\nnot Rouse(barry, alecia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The dougie is doglike. The nedi systemise the stanwood. The stanwood is perinasal. If something prink the nedi then the nedi prink the stanwood. If the dougie prink the stanwood and the stanwood prink the nedi then the nedi is bailable. If something systemise the stanwood then it prink the nedi. If something prink the stanwood then it is lobar. If something systemise the dougie and it prink the nedi then it is perinasal. If something systemise the nedi then the nedi illuminate the dougie. The stanwood is kind.", "logic": "\nDoglike(dougie)\nSystemise(nedi, stanwood)\nPerinasal(stanwood)\nforall x (Prink(x, nedi) -> Prink(nedi, stanwood))\nPrink(dougie, stanwood) and Prink(stanwood, nedi) -> Bailable(nedi)\nforall x (Systemise(x, stanwood) -> Prink(x, nedi))\nforall x (Prink(x, stanwood) -> Lobar(x))\nforall x (Systemise(x, dougie) and Prink(x, nedi) -> Perinasal(x))\nforall x (Systemise(x, nedi) -> Illuminate(nedi, dougie))\n\nKind(stanwood)\n\nKind(stanwood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The jackie is togolese. The eleonora buttress the gratia. The gratia is clueless. If something curb the eleonora then the eleonora curb the gratia. If the jackie curb the gratia and the gratia curb the eleonora then the eleonora is glimmery. If something buttress the gratia then it curb the eleonora. If something curb the gratia then it is jesuitical. If something buttress the jackie and it curb the eleonora then it is clueless. If something buttress the eleonora then the eleonora hinge the jackie. The eleonora does not like the eleonora.", "logic": "\nTogolese(jackie)\nButtress(eleonora, gratia)\nClueless(gratia)\nforall x (Curb(x, eleonora) -> Curb(eleonora, gratia))\nCurb(jackie, gratia) and Curb(gratia, eleonora) -> Glimmery(eleonora)\nforall x (Buttress(x, gratia) -> Curb(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Curb(x, gratia) -> Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Buttress(x, jackie) and Curb(x, eleonora) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Buttress(x, eleonora) -> Hinge(eleonora, jackie))\n\nnot Buttress(eleonora, eleonora)\n\nnot Buttress(eleonora, eleonora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The cora is resentful. The forrester equate the gilberto. The gilberto is allomerous. If something outcrop the forrester then the forrester outcrop the gilberto. If the cora outcrop the gilberto and the gilberto outcrop the forrester then the forrester is hooked. If something equate the gilberto then it outcrop the forrester. If something outcrop the gilberto then it is prepared. If something equate the cora and it outcrop the forrester then it is allomerous. If something equate the forrester then the forrester disgrace the cora. The cora is hooked.", "logic": "\nResentful(cora)\nEquate(forrester, gilberto)\nAllomerous(gilberto)\nforall x (Outcrop(x, forrester) -> Outcrop(forrester, gilberto))\nOutcrop(cora, gilberto) and Outcrop(gilberto, forrester) -> Hooked(forrester)\nforall x (Equate(x, gilberto) -> Outcrop(x, forrester))\nforall x (Outcrop(x, gilberto) -> Prepared(x))\nforall x (Equate(x, cora) and Outcrop(x, forrester) -> Allomerous(x))\nforall x (Equate(x, forrester) -> Disgrace(forrester, cora))\n\nHooked(cora)\n\nHooked(cora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1148"} {"premises": "The rob is corneous. The staford deserve the rob. The silvio matter the augie. The augie is invitatory. If something is corneous and it spotlight the staford then it matter the rob. If something deserve the rob then the rob matter the silvio. If something matter the silvio then the silvio is distant. If something spotlight the rob then it deserve the staford. If something is distant then it matter the staford. If something is demode then it matter the staford. The augie is invitatory.", "logic": "\nCorneous(rob)\nDeserve(staford, rob)\nMatter(silvio, augie)\nInvitatory(augie)\nforall x (Corneous(x) and Spotlight(x, staford) -> Matter(x, rob))\nforall x (Deserve(x, rob) -> Matter(rob, silvio))\nforall x (Matter(x, silvio) -> Distant(silvio))\nforall x (Spotlight(x, rob) -> Deserve(x, staford))\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Matter(x, staford))\nforall x (Demode(x) -> Matter(x, staford))\n\nInvitatory(augie)\n\ntherefore Invitatory(augie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The barbee is openhanded. The felicio capsule the barbee. The ruella enamel the emery. The emery is osteal. If something is openhanded and it cheek the felicio then it enamel the barbee. If something capsule the barbee then the barbee enamel the ruella. If something enamel the ruella then the ruella is hefty. If something cheek the barbee then it capsule the felicio. If something is hefty then it enamel the felicio. If something is meridian then it enamel the felicio. The emery is not osteal.", "logic": "\nOpenhanded(barbee)\nCapsule(felicio, barbee)\nEnamel(ruella, emery)\nOsteal(emery)\nforall x (Openhanded(x) and Cheek(x, felicio) -> Enamel(x, barbee))\nforall x (Capsule(x, barbee) -> Enamel(barbee, ruella))\nforall x (Enamel(x, ruella) -> Hefty(ruella))\nforall x (Cheek(x, barbee) -> Capsule(x, felicio))\nforall x (Hefty(x) -> Enamel(x, felicio))\nforall x (Meridian(x) -> Enamel(x, felicio))\n\nnot Osteal(emery)\n\ntherefore Osteal(emery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The zack is seminude. The margalo moisten the zack. The tom pigment the siobhan. The siobhan is bitchy. If something is seminude and it lignify the margalo then it pigment the zack. If something moisten the zack then the zack pigment the tom. If something pigment the tom then the tom is suppliant. If something lignify the zack then it moisten the margalo. If something is suppliant then it pigment the margalo. If something is pronominal then it pigment the margalo. The zack pigment the tom.", "logic": "\nSeminude(zack)\nMoisten(margalo, zack)\nPigment(tom, siobhan)\nBitchy(siobhan)\nforall x (Seminude(x) and Lignify(x, margalo) -> Pigment(x, zack))\nforall x (Moisten(x, zack) -> Pigment(zack, tom))\nforall x (Pigment(x, tom) -> Suppliant(tom))\nforall x (Lignify(x, zack) -> Moisten(x, margalo))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Pigment(x, margalo))\nforall x (Pronominal(x) -> Pigment(x, margalo))\n\nPigment(zack, tom)\n\nMoisten(margalo, zack) and forall x (Moisten(x, zack) -> Pigment(zack, tom)) -> therefore Pigment(zack, tom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The giffy is viewless. The hallie lithograph the giffy. The carli motorboat the jenifer. The jenifer is snooty. If something is viewless and it antiquate the hallie then it motorboat the giffy. If something lithograph the giffy then the giffy motorboat the carli. If something motorboat the carli then the carli is faineant. If something antiquate the giffy then it lithograph the hallie. If something is faineant then it motorboat the hallie. If something is distressed then it motorboat the hallie. The giffy does not eat the carli.", "logic": "\nViewless(giffy)\nLithograph(hallie, giffy)\nMotorboat(carli, jenifer)\nSnooty(jenifer)\nforall x (Viewless(x) and Antiquate(x, hallie) -> Motorboat(x, giffy))\nforall x (Lithograph(x, giffy) -> Motorboat(giffy, carli))\nforall x (Motorboat(x, carli) -> Faineant(carli))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, giffy) -> Lithograph(x, hallie))\nforall x (Faineant(x) -> Motorboat(x, hallie))\nforall x (Distressed(x) -> Motorboat(x, hallie))\n\nnot Motorboat(giffy, carli)\n\nLithograph(hallie, giffy) and forall x (Lithograph(x, giffy) -> Motorboat(giffy, carli)) -> therefore Motorboat(giffy, carli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The endora is tasselled. The loree execrate the endora. The tilly barbecue the randal. The randal is ghanian. If something is tasselled and it dinge the loree then it barbecue the endora. If something execrate the endora then the endora barbecue the tilly. If something barbecue the tilly then the tilly is clear. If something dinge the endora then it execrate the loree. If something is clear then it barbecue the loree. If something is footless then it barbecue the loree. The tilly is clear.", "logic": "\nTasselled(endora)\nExecrate(loree, endora)\nBarbecue(tilly, randal)\nGhanian(randal)\nforall x (Tasselled(x) and Dinge(x, loree) -> Barbecue(x, endora))\nforall x (Execrate(x, endora) -> Barbecue(endora, tilly))\nforall x (Barbecue(x, tilly) -> Clear(tilly))\nforall x (Dinge(x, endora) -> Execrate(x, loree))\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Barbecue(x, loree))\nforall x (Footless(x) -> Barbecue(x, loree))\n\nClear(tilly)\n\nExecrate(loree, endora) and forall x (Execrate(x, endora) -> Barbecue(endora, tilly)) -> therefore Barbecue(endora, tilly) Barbecue(endora, tilly) and forall x (Barbecue(x, tilly) -> Clear(tilly)) -> therefore Clear(tilly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The townie is prakritic. The lise spondaise the townie. The florenza destress the elsbeth. The elsbeth is martial. If something is prakritic and it fluff the lise then it destress the townie. If something spondaise the townie then the townie destress the florenza. If something destress the florenza then the florenza is mercuric. If something fluff the townie then it spondaise the lise. If something is mercuric then it destress the lise. If something is basilary then it destress the lise. The florenza is not mercuric.", "logic": "\nPrakritic(townie)\nSpondaise(lise, townie)\nDestress(florenza, elsbeth)\nMartial(elsbeth)\nforall x (Prakritic(x) and Fluff(x, lise) -> Destress(x, townie))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, townie) -> Destress(townie, florenza))\nforall x (Destress(x, florenza) -> Mercuric(florenza))\nforall x (Fluff(x, townie) -> Spondaise(x, lise))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) -> Destress(x, lise))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Destress(x, lise))\n\nnot Mercuric(florenza)\n\nSpondaise(lise, townie) and forall x (Spondaise(x, townie) -> Destress(townie, florenza)) -> therefore Destress(townie, florenza) Destress(townie, florenza) and forall x (Destress(x, florenza) -> Mercuric(florenza)) -> therefore Mercuric(florenza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The matty is subjacent. The ronnie immure the matty. The ulises accustom the fairfax. The fairfax is zero. If something is subjacent and it politicise the ronnie then it accustom the matty. If something immure the matty then the matty accustom the ulises. If something accustom the ulises then the ulises is managerial. If something politicise the matty then it immure the ronnie. If something is managerial then it accustom the ronnie. If something is climatical then it accustom the ronnie. The ulises accustom the ronnie.", "logic": "\nSubjacent(matty)\nImmure(ronnie, matty)\nAccustom(ulises, fairfax)\nZero(fairfax)\nforall x (Subjacent(x) and Politicise(x, ronnie) -> Accustom(x, matty))\nforall x (Immure(x, matty) -> Accustom(matty, ulises))\nforall x (Accustom(x, ulises) -> Managerial(ulises))\nforall x (Politicise(x, matty) -> Immure(x, ronnie))\nforall x (Managerial(x) -> Accustom(x, ronnie))\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> Accustom(x, ronnie))\n\nAccustom(ulises, ronnie)\n\nImmure(ronnie, matty) and forall x (Immure(x, matty) -> Accustom(matty, ulises)) -> therefore Accustom(matty, ulises) Accustom(matty, ulises) and forall x (Accustom(x, ulises) -> Managerial(ulises)) -> therefore Managerial(ulises) Managerial(ulises) and forall x (Managerial(x) -> Accustom(x, ronnie)) -> therefore Accustom(ulises, ronnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The heinz is outback. The chane pasteurise the heinz. The clareta merge the vance. The vance is anadromous. If something is outback and it amortize the chane then it merge the heinz. If something pasteurise the heinz then the heinz merge the clareta. If something merge the clareta then the clareta is bellyless. If something amortize the heinz then it pasteurise the chane. If something is bellyless then it merge the chane. If something is recovering then it merge the chane. The clareta does not eat the chane.", "logic": "\nOutback(heinz)\nPasteurise(chane, heinz)\nMerge(clareta, vance)\nAnadromous(vance)\nforall x (Outback(x) and Amortize(x, chane) -> Merge(x, heinz))\nforall x (Pasteurise(x, heinz) -> Merge(heinz, clareta))\nforall x (Merge(x, clareta) -> Bellyless(clareta))\nforall x (Amortize(x, heinz) -> Pasteurise(x, chane))\nforall x (Bellyless(x) -> Merge(x, chane))\nforall x (Recovering(x) -> Merge(x, chane))\n\nnot Merge(clareta, chane)\n\nPasteurise(chane, heinz) and forall x (Pasteurise(x, heinz) -> Merge(heinz, clareta)) -> therefore Merge(heinz, clareta) Merge(heinz, clareta) and forall x (Merge(x, clareta) -> Bellyless(clareta)) -> therefore Bellyless(clareta) Bellyless(clareta) and forall x (Bellyless(x) -> Merge(x, chane)) -> therefore Merge(clareta, chane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The ilse is algerian. The daisie leash the ilse. The broddy devalue the lynnette. The lynnette is played. If something is algerian and it vowelise the daisie then it devalue the ilse. If something leash the ilse then the ilse devalue the broddy. If something devalue the broddy then the broddy is chargeable. If something vowelise the ilse then it leash the daisie. If something is chargeable then it devalue the daisie. If something is palliative then it devalue the daisie. The broddy does not eat the ilse.", "logic": "\nAlgerian(ilse)\nLeash(daisie, ilse)\nDevalue(broddy, lynnette)\nPlayed(lynnette)\nforall x (Algerian(x) and Vowelise(x, daisie) -> Devalue(x, ilse))\nforall x (Leash(x, ilse) -> Devalue(ilse, broddy))\nforall x (Devalue(x, broddy) -> Chargeable(broddy))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, ilse) -> Leash(x, daisie))\nforall x (Chargeable(x) -> Devalue(x, daisie))\nforall x (Palliative(x) -> Devalue(x, daisie))\n\nnot Devalue(broddy, ilse)\n\nforall x (Algerian(x) and Vowelise(x, daisie) -> Devalue(x, ilse)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The gabbi is florentine. The davide velcro the gabbi. The nonnah victimise the carlita. The carlita is patent. If something is florentine and it deputize the davide then it victimise the gabbi. If something velcro the gabbi then the gabbi victimise the nonnah. If something victimise the nonnah then the nonnah is clashing. If something deputize the gabbi then it velcro the davide. If something is clashing then it victimise the davide. If something is gamey then it victimise the davide. The davide victimise the davide.", "logic": "\nFlorentine(gabbi)\nVelcro(davide, gabbi)\nVictimise(nonnah, carlita)\nPatent(carlita)\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Deputize(x, davide) -> Victimise(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Velcro(x, gabbi) -> Victimise(gabbi, nonnah))\nforall x (Victimise(x, nonnah) -> Clashing(nonnah))\nforall x (Deputize(x, gabbi) -> Velcro(x, davide))\nforall x (Clashing(x) -> Victimise(x, davide))\nforall x (Gamey(x) -> Victimise(x, davide))\n\nVictimise(davide, davide)\n\nforall x (Clashing(x) -> Victimise(x, davide)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The bobbi is bountiful. The noel queen the bobbi. The mohammad blether the simonne. The simonne is advancing. If something is bountiful and it bach the noel then it blether the bobbi. If something queen the bobbi then the bobbi blether the mohammad. If something blether the mohammad then the mohammad is appendant. If something bach the bobbi then it queen the noel. If something is appendant then it blether the noel. If something is placeable then it blether the noel. The simonne does not eat the noel.", "logic": "\nBountiful(bobbi)\nQueen(noel, bobbi)\nBlether(mohammad, simonne)\nAdvancing(simonne)\nforall x (Bountiful(x) and Bach(x, noel) -> Blether(x, bobbi))\nforall x (Queen(x, bobbi) -> Blether(bobbi, mohammad))\nforall x (Blether(x, mohammad) -> Appendant(mohammad))\nforall x (Bach(x, bobbi) -> Queen(x, noel))\nforall x (Appendant(x) -> Blether(x, noel))\nforall x (Placeable(x) -> Blether(x, noel))\n\nnot Blether(simonne, noel)\n\nforall x (Appendant(x) -> Blether(x, noel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The patin is mute. The korry outgrow the patin. The annamari flick the ivonne. The ivonne is beetle. If something is mute and it factorise the korry then it flick the patin. If something outgrow the patin then the patin flick the annamari. If something flick the annamari then the annamari is brindled. If something factorise the patin then it outgrow the korry. If something is brindled then it flick the korry. If something is acceptable then it flick the korry. The korry flick the patin.", "logic": "\nMute(patin)\nOutgrow(korry, patin)\nFlick(annamari, ivonne)\nBeetle(ivonne)\nforall x (Mute(x) and Factorise(x, korry) -> Flick(x, patin))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, patin) -> Flick(patin, annamari))\nforall x (Flick(x, annamari) -> Brindled(annamari))\nforall x (Factorise(x, patin) -> Outgrow(x, korry))\nforall x (Brindled(x) -> Flick(x, korry))\nforall x (Acceptable(x) -> Flick(x, korry))\n\nFlick(korry, patin)\n\nforall x (Mute(x) and Factorise(x, korry) -> Flick(x, patin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The mersey is fooling. The cristine intermix the mersey. The marchelle syllabify the ruben. The ruben is corked. If something is fooling and it convene the cristine then it syllabify the mersey. If something intermix the mersey then the mersey syllabify the marchelle. If something syllabify the marchelle then the marchelle is unedited. If something convene the mersey then it intermix the cristine. If something is unedited then it syllabify the cristine. If something is burdenless then it syllabify the cristine. The cristine is not burdenless.", "logic": "\nFooling(mersey)\nIntermix(cristine, mersey)\nSyllabify(marchelle, ruben)\nCorked(ruben)\nforall x (Fooling(x) and Convene(x, cristine) -> Syllabify(x, mersey))\nforall x (Intermix(x, mersey) -> Syllabify(mersey, marchelle))\nforall x (Syllabify(x, marchelle) -> Unedited(marchelle))\nforall x (Convene(x, mersey) -> Intermix(x, cristine))\nforall x (Unedited(x) -> Syllabify(x, cristine))\nforall x (Burdenless(x) -> Syllabify(x, cristine))\n\nnot Burdenless(cristine)\n\nnot Burdenless(cristine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The frayda is oleophilic. The lancelot mimeo the frayda. The othilia dado the olivie. The olivie is ostensive. If something is oleophilic and it toady the lancelot then it dado the frayda. If something mimeo the frayda then the frayda dado the othilia. If something dado the othilia then the othilia is mutinous. If something toady the frayda then it mimeo the lancelot. If something is mutinous then it dado the lancelot. If something is washed then it dado the lancelot. The othilia is green.", "logic": "\nOleophilic(frayda)\nMimeo(lancelot, frayda)\nDado(othilia, olivie)\nOstensive(olivie)\nforall x (Oleophilic(x) and Toady(x, lancelot) -> Dado(x, frayda))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, frayda) -> Dado(frayda, othilia))\nforall x (Dado(x, othilia) -> Mutinous(othilia))\nforall x (Toady(x, frayda) -> Mimeo(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) -> Dado(x, lancelot))\nforall x (Washed(x) -> Dado(x, lancelot))\n\nGreen(othilia)\n\nGreen(othilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The marci is unpolished. The hilary swallow the marci. The datha exercise the katha. The katha is vatical. If something is unpolished and it zipper the hilary then it exercise the marci. If something swallow the marci then the marci exercise the datha. If something exercise the datha then the datha is autacoidal. If something zipper the marci then it swallow the hilary. If something is autacoidal then it exercise the hilary. If something is pinstriped then it exercise the hilary. The katha is not green.", "logic": "\nUnpolished(marci)\nSwallow(hilary, marci)\nExercise(datha, katha)\nVatical(katha)\nforall x (Unpolished(x) and Zipper(x, hilary) -> Exercise(x, marci))\nforall x (Swallow(x, marci) -> Exercise(marci, datha))\nforall x (Exercise(x, datha) -> Autacoidal(datha))\nforall x (Zipper(x, marci) -> Swallow(x, hilary))\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) -> Exercise(x, hilary))\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) -> Exercise(x, hilary))\n\nnot Green(katha)\n\nnot Green(katha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The jacquetta is chilling. The hayden dish the jacquetta. The dina evade the auroora. The auroora is twin. If something is chilling and it outshine the hayden then it evade the jacquetta. If something dish the jacquetta then the jacquetta evade the dina. If something evade the dina then the dina is sharing. If something outshine the jacquetta then it dish the hayden. If something is sharing then it evade the hayden. If something is barefoot then it evade the hayden. The hayden is chilling.", "logic": "\nChilling(jacquetta)\nDish(hayden, jacquetta)\nEvade(dina, auroora)\nTwin(auroora)\nforall x (Chilling(x) and Outshine(x, hayden) -> Evade(x, jacquetta))\nforall x (Dish(x, jacquetta) -> Evade(jacquetta, dina))\nforall x (Evade(x, dina) -> Sharing(dina))\nforall x (Outshine(x, jacquetta) -> Dish(x, hayden))\nforall x (Sharing(x) -> Evade(x, hayden))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) -> Evade(x, hayden))\n\nChilling(hayden)\n\nChilling(hayden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "The kiele is nonpublic. The kiele is immutable. The kiele is poignant. If the kiele is nonpublic then the kiele is inherited. Rough, parked things are nonpublic. The kiele is immutable.", "logic": "\nNonpublic(kiele)\nImmutable(kiele)\nPoignant(kiele)\nNonpublic(kiele) -> Inherited(kiele)\nforall x (Poignant(x) and Parked(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\n\nImmutable(kiele)\n\ntherefore Immutable(kiele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "The molli is insulting. The molli is agronomic. The molli is saute. If the molli is insulting then the molli is verifying. Rough, quotidian things are insulting. The molli is not agronomic.", "logic": "\nInsulting(molli)\nAgronomic(molli)\nSaute(molli)\nInsulting(molli) -> Verifying(molli)\nforall x (Saute(x) and Quotidian(x) -> Insulting(x))\n\nnot Agronomic(molli)\n\ntherefore Agronomic(molli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "The yolanthe is delayed. The yolanthe is moldovan. The yolanthe is unmerited. If the yolanthe is delayed then the yolanthe is lactating. Rough, besotted things are delayed. The yolanthe is lactating.", "logic": "\nDelayed(yolanthe)\nMoldovan(yolanthe)\nUnmerited(yolanthe)\nDelayed(yolanthe) -> Lactating(yolanthe)\nforall x (Unmerited(x) and Besotted(x) -> Delayed(x))\n\nLactating(yolanthe)\n\nDelayed(yolanthe) and Delayed(yolanthe) -> Lactating(yolanthe) -> therefore Lactating(yolanthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "The jaquelyn is gossipy. The jaquelyn is anorthic. The jaquelyn is abounding. If the jaquelyn is gossipy then the jaquelyn is flagging. Rough, downbound things are gossipy. The jaquelyn is not flagging.", "logic": "\nGossipy(jaquelyn)\nAnorthic(jaquelyn)\nAbounding(jaquelyn)\nGossipy(jaquelyn) -> Flagging(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Abounding(x) and Downbound(x) -> Gossipy(x))\n\nnot Flagging(jaquelyn)\n\nGossipy(jaquelyn) and Gossipy(jaquelyn) -> Flagging(jaquelyn) -> therefore Flagging(jaquelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "The town is graspable. The town is aggregated. The town is siamese. If the town is graspable then the town is saharan. Rough, perinasal things are graspable. The town does not need the town.", "logic": "\nGraspable(town)\nAggregated(town)\nSiamese(town)\nGraspable(town) -> Saharan(town)\nforall x (Siamese(x) and Perinasal(x) -> Graspable(x))\n\nnot Needs(town, town)\n\nnot Needs(town, town) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "The serge is overstrung. The serge is ignited. The serge is nervy. If the serge is overstrung then the serge is inwrought. Rough, plumaged things are overstrung. The serge sees the serge.", "logic": "\nOverstrung(serge)\nIgnited(serge)\nNervy(serge)\nOverstrung(serge) -> Inwrought(serge)\nforall x (Nervy(x) and Plumaged(x) -> Overstrung(x))\n\nSees(serge, serge)\n\nSees(serge, serge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "The zondra is duplicate. The zondra is historic. The zondra is liquescent. If the zondra is duplicate then the zondra is algebraic. Rough, polygonal things are duplicate. The zondra does not chase the zondra.", "logic": "\nDuplicate(zondra)\nHistoric(zondra)\nLiquescent(zondra)\nDuplicate(zondra) -> Algebraic(zondra)\nforall x (Liquescent(x) and Polygonal(x) -> Duplicate(x))\n\nnot Chases(zondra, zondra)\n\nnot Chases(zondra, zondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "The roderic is palpatory. The roderic is meaty. The roderic is unpaid. If the roderic is palpatory then the roderic is uncounted. Rough, arborous things are palpatory. The roderic is arborous.", "logic": "\nPalpatory(roderic)\nMeaty(roderic)\nUnpaid(roderic)\nPalpatory(roderic) -> Uncounted(roderic)\nforall x (Unpaid(x) and Arborous(x) -> Palpatory(x))\n\nArborous(roderic)\n\nArborous(roderic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-559"} {"premises": "Ignacio is not caulescent. Raychel is caulescent. Catlin is fifteenth. If something is foliaged and not caulescent then it is murky. Round things are fifteenth. If Catlin is uncultured and Catlin is cyclical then Catlin is foliaged. All fifteenth things are uncultured. If Ignacio is murky and Ignacio is cyclical then Ignacio is not foliaged. All uncultured things are foliaged. Ignacio is not caulescent.", "logic": "\nnot Caulescent(ignacio)\nCaulescent(raychel)\nFifteenth(catlin)\nforall x (Foliaged(x) and not Caulescent(x) -> Murky(x))\nforall x (Caulescent(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\nUncultured(catlin) and Cyclical(catlin) -> Foliaged(catlin)\nforall x (Fifteenth(x) -> Uncultured(x))\nMurky(ignacio) and Cyclical(ignacio) -> not Foliaged(ignacio)\nforall x (Uncultured(x) -> Foliaged(x))\n\nnot Caulescent(ignacio)\n\ntherefore not Caulescent(ignacio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Charyl is not inborn. Philly is inborn. Nealon is sphingine. If something is submissive and not inborn then it is teenaged. Round things are sphingine. If Nealon is permanent and Nealon is unassigned then Nealon is submissive. All sphingine things are permanent. If Charyl is teenaged and Charyl is unassigned then Charyl is not submissive. All permanent things are submissive. Nealon is not sphingine.", "logic": "\nnot Inborn(charyl)\nInborn(philly)\nSphingine(nealon)\nforall x (Submissive(x) and not Inborn(x) -> Teenaged(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) -> Sphingine(x))\nPermanent(nealon) and Unassigned(nealon) -> Submissive(nealon)\nforall x (Sphingine(x) -> Permanent(x))\nTeenaged(charyl) and Unassigned(charyl) -> not Submissive(charyl)\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Submissive(x))\n\nnot Sphingine(nealon)\n\ntherefore Sphingine(nealon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Patty is not sizeable. Ingeberg is sizeable. Neale is idealized. If something is cancellous and not sizeable then it is littered. Round things are idealized. If Neale is pyrogenous and Neale is habitual then Neale is cancellous. All idealized things are pyrogenous. If Patty is littered and Patty is habitual then Patty is not cancellous. All pyrogenous things are cancellous. Ingeberg is idealized.", "logic": "\nnot Sizeable(patty)\nSizeable(ingeberg)\nIdealized(neale)\nforall x (Cancellous(x) and not Sizeable(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) -> Idealized(x))\nPyrogenous(neale) and Habitual(neale) -> Cancellous(neale)\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Pyrogenous(x))\nLittered(patty) and Habitual(patty) -> not Cancellous(patty)\nforall x (Pyrogenous(x) -> Cancellous(x))\n\nIdealized(ingeberg)\n\nSizeable(ingeberg) and forall x (Sizeable(x) -> Idealized(x)) -> therefore Idealized(ingeberg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Pansy is not interlaced. Ardene is interlaced. Corrinne is equipt. If something is shouldered and not interlaced then it is coveted. Round things are equipt. If Corrinne is newfangled and Corrinne is planar then Corrinne is shouldered. All equipt things are newfangled. If Pansy is coveted and Pansy is planar then Pansy is not shouldered. All newfangled things are shouldered. Ardene is not equipt.", "logic": "\nnot Interlaced(pansy)\nInterlaced(ardene)\nEquipt(corrinne)\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and not Interlaced(x) -> Coveted(x))\nforall x (Interlaced(x) -> Equipt(x))\nNewfangled(corrinne) and Planar(corrinne) -> Shouldered(corrinne)\nforall x (Equipt(x) -> Newfangled(x))\nCoveted(pansy) and Planar(pansy) -> not Shouldered(pansy)\nforall x (Newfangled(x) -> Shouldered(x))\n\nnot Equipt(ardene)\n\nInterlaced(ardene) and forall x (Interlaced(x) -> Equipt(x)) -> therefore Equipt(ardene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Sherrie is not insulting. Griswold is insulting. Almeta is wriggling. If something is convolute and not insulting then it is engaging. Round things are wriggling. If Almeta is unsavory and Almeta is uvular then Almeta is convolute. All wriggling things are unsavory. If Sherrie is engaging and Sherrie is uvular then Sherrie is not convolute. All unsavory things are convolute. Almeta is convolute.", "logic": "\nnot Insulting(sherrie)\nInsulting(griswold)\nWriggling(almeta)\nforall x (Convolute(x) and not Insulting(x) -> Engaging(x))\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nUnsavory(almeta) and Uvular(almeta) -> Convolute(almeta)\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nEngaging(sherrie) and Uvular(sherrie) -> not Convolute(sherrie)\nforall x (Unsavory(x) -> Convolute(x))\n\nConvolute(almeta)\n\nWriggling(almeta) and forall x (Wriggling(x) -> Unsavory(x)) -> therefore Unsavory(almeta) Unsavory(almeta) and forall x (Unsavory(x) -> Convolute(x)) -> therefore Convolute(almeta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Therese is not togolese. Orella is togolese. Brewster is fallacious. If something is harnessed and not togolese then it is bouffant. Round things are fallacious. If Brewster is romish and Brewster is univocal then Brewster is harnessed. All fallacious things are romish. If Therese is bouffant and Therese is univocal then Therese is not harnessed. All romish things are harnessed. Orella is not romish.", "logic": "\nnot Togolese(therese)\nTogolese(orella)\nFallacious(brewster)\nforall x (Harnessed(x) and not Togolese(x) -> Bouffant(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> Fallacious(x))\nRomish(brewster) and Univocal(brewster) -> Harnessed(brewster)\nforall x (Fallacious(x) -> Romish(x))\nBouffant(therese) and Univocal(therese) -> not Harnessed(therese)\nforall x (Romish(x) -> Harnessed(x))\n\nnot Romish(orella)\n\nTogolese(orella) and forall x (Togolese(x) -> Fallacious(x)) -> therefore Fallacious(orella) Fallacious(orella) and forall x (Fallacious(x) -> Romish(x)) -> therefore Romish(orella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Bab is not dangerous. Dorree is dangerous. Nance is distressed. If something is oiled and not dangerous then it is sliding. Round things are distressed. If Nance is aghast and Nance is adjustable then Nance is oiled. All distressed things are aghast. If Bab is sliding and Bab is adjustable then Bab is not oiled. All aghast things are oiled. Dorree is oiled.", "logic": "\nnot Dangerous(bab)\nDangerous(dorree)\nDistressed(nance)\nforall x (Oiled(x) and not Dangerous(x) -> Sliding(x))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) -> Distressed(x))\nAghast(nance) and Adjustable(nance) -> Oiled(nance)\nforall x (Distressed(x) -> Aghast(x))\nSliding(bab) and Adjustable(bab) -> not Oiled(bab)\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Oiled(x))\n\nOiled(dorree)\n\nDangerous(dorree) and forall x (Dangerous(x) -> Distressed(x)) -> therefore Distressed(dorree) Distressed(dorree) and forall x (Distressed(x) -> Aghast(x)) -> therefore Aghast(dorree) Aghast(dorree) and forall x (Aghast(x) -> Oiled(x)) -> therefore Oiled(dorree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Ted is not antithetic. Irving is antithetic. Dougie is antinomian. If something is flightless and not antithetic then it is trustful. Round things are antinomian. If Dougie is inordinate and Dougie is robotic then Dougie is flightless. All antinomian things are inordinate. If Ted is trustful and Ted is robotic then Ted is not flightless. All inordinate things are flightless. Irving is not flightless.", "logic": "\nnot Antithetic(ted)\nAntithetic(irving)\nAntinomian(dougie)\nforall x (Flightless(x) and not Antithetic(x) -> Trustful(x))\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Antinomian(x))\nInordinate(dougie) and Robotic(dougie) -> Flightless(dougie)\nforall x (Antinomian(x) -> Inordinate(x))\nTrustful(ted) and Robotic(ted) -> not Flightless(ted)\nforall x (Inordinate(x) -> Flightless(x))\n\nnot Flightless(irving)\n\nAntithetic(irving) and forall x (Antithetic(x) -> Antinomian(x)) -> therefore Antinomian(irving) Antinomian(irving) and forall x (Antinomian(x) -> Inordinate(x)) -> therefore Inordinate(irving) Inordinate(irving) and forall x (Inordinate(x) -> Flightless(x)) -> therefore Flightless(irving)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Vaughan is not bimetallic. Gavrielle is bimetallic. Conni is husky. If something is uncensored and not bimetallic then it is mixed. Round things are husky. If Conni is copacetic and Conni is diffuse then Conni is uncensored. All husky things are copacetic. If Vaughan is mixed and Vaughan is diffuse then Vaughan is not uncensored. All copacetic things are uncensored. Conni is not mixed.", "logic": "\nnot Bimetallic(vaughan)\nBimetallic(gavrielle)\nHusky(conni)\nforall x (Uncensored(x) and not Bimetallic(x) -> Mixed(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) -> Husky(x))\nCopacetic(conni) and Diffuse(conni) -> Uncensored(conni)\nforall x (Husky(x) -> Copacetic(x))\nMixed(vaughan) and Diffuse(vaughan) -> not Uncensored(vaughan)\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Uncensored(x))\n\nnot Mixed(conni)\n\nforall x (Uncensored(x) and not Bimetallic(x) -> Mixed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Morten is not techy. Emerson is techy. Kalindi is prefaded. If something is lite and not techy then it is quixotic. Round things are prefaded. If Kalindi is inlaid and Kalindi is bacterioid then Kalindi is lite. All prefaded things are inlaid. If Morten is quixotic and Morten is bacterioid then Morten is not lite. All inlaid things are lite. Morten is quixotic.", "logic": "\nnot Techy(morten)\nTechy(emerson)\nPrefaded(kalindi)\nforall x (Lite(x) and not Techy(x) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Techy(x) -> Prefaded(x))\nInlaid(kalindi) and Bacterioid(kalindi) -> Lite(kalindi)\nforall x (Prefaded(x) -> Inlaid(x))\nQuixotic(morten) and Bacterioid(morten) -> not Lite(morten)\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Lite(x))\n\nQuixotic(morten)\n\nforall x (Lite(x) and not Techy(x) -> Quixotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Billi is not bastardly. Blanch is bastardly. Darline is incisive. If something is alkalotic and not bastardly then it is handelian. Round things are incisive. If Darline is extralegal and Darline is acerate then Darline is alkalotic. All incisive things are extralegal. If Billi is handelian and Billi is acerate then Billi is not alkalotic. All extralegal things are alkalotic. Billi is not incisive.", "logic": "\nnot Bastardly(billi)\nBastardly(blanch)\nIncisive(darline)\nforall x (Alkalotic(x) and not Bastardly(x) -> Handelian(x))\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> Incisive(x))\nExtralegal(darline) and Acerate(darline) -> Alkalotic(darline)\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Extralegal(x))\nHandelian(billi) and Acerate(billi) -> not Alkalotic(billi)\nforall x (Extralegal(x) -> Alkalotic(x))\n\nnot Incisive(billi)\n\nforall x (Bastardly(x) -> Incisive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Peg is not trilingual. Jolee is trilingual. Klarrisa is imbalanced. If something is sternal and not trilingual then it is dimorphic. Round things are imbalanced. If Klarrisa is totemic and Klarrisa is mailed then Klarrisa is sternal. All imbalanced things are totemic. If Peg is dimorphic and Peg is mailed then Peg is not sternal. All totemic things are sternal. Jolee is dimorphic.", "logic": "\nnot Trilingual(peg)\nTrilingual(jolee)\nImbalanced(klarrisa)\nforall x (Sternal(x) and not Trilingual(x) -> Dimorphic(x))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) -> Imbalanced(x))\nTotemic(klarrisa) and Mailed(klarrisa) -> Sternal(klarrisa)\nforall x (Imbalanced(x) -> Totemic(x))\nDimorphic(peg) and Mailed(peg) -> not Sternal(peg)\nforall x (Totemic(x) -> Sternal(x))\n\nDimorphic(jolee)\n\nforall x (Sternal(x) and not Trilingual(x) -> Dimorphic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Nona is not opposable. Yacov is opposable. Sherlock is analog. If something is uninominal and not opposable then it is lineal. Round things are analog. If Sherlock is striped and Sherlock is morphemic then Sherlock is uninominal. All analog things are striped. If Nona is lineal and Nona is morphemic then Nona is not uninominal. All striped things are uninominal. Yacov is not kind.", "logic": "\nnot Opposable(nona)\nOpposable(yacov)\nAnalog(sherlock)\nforall x (Uninominal(x) and not Opposable(x) -> Lineal(x))\nforall x (Opposable(x) -> Analog(x))\nStriped(sherlock) and Morphemic(sherlock) -> Uninominal(sherlock)\nforall x (Analog(x) -> Striped(x))\nLineal(nona) and Morphemic(nona) -> not Uninominal(nona)\nforall x (Striped(x) -> Uninominal(x))\n\nnot Kind(yacov)\n\nnot Kind(yacov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Miles is not panoplied. Dosi is panoplied. Annabel is inhibitory. If something is unthought and not panoplied then it is limiting. Round things are inhibitory. If Annabel is illusive and Annabel is gainly then Annabel is unthought. All inhibitory things are illusive. If Miles is limiting and Miles is gainly then Miles is not unthought. All illusive things are unthought. Miles is gainly.", "logic": "\nnot Panoplied(miles)\nPanoplied(dosi)\nInhibitory(annabel)\nforall x (Unthought(x) and not Panoplied(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> Inhibitory(x))\nIllusive(annabel) and Gainly(annabel) -> Unthought(annabel)\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) -> Illusive(x))\nLimiting(miles) and Gainly(miles) -> not Unthought(miles)\nforall x (Illusive(x) -> Unthought(x))\n\nGainly(miles)\n\nGainly(miles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Elliot is not immunized. Vallie is immunized. Marillin is anaerobic. If something is armoured and not immunized then it is slight. Round things are anaerobic. If Marillin is impending and Marillin is abaxial then Marillin is armoured. All anaerobic things are impending. If Elliot is slight and Elliot is abaxial then Elliot is not armoured. All impending things are armoured. Marillin is not kind.", "logic": "\nnot Immunized(elliot)\nImmunized(vallie)\nAnaerobic(marillin)\nforall x (Armoured(x) and not Immunized(x) -> Slight(x))\nforall x (Immunized(x) -> Anaerobic(x))\nImpending(marillin) and Abaxial(marillin) -> Armoured(marillin)\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Impending(x))\nSlight(elliot) and Abaxial(elliot) -> not Armoured(elliot)\nforall x (Impending(x) -> Armoured(x))\n\nnot Kind(marillin)\n\nnot Kind(marillin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Antin is not vinegary. Ameline is vinegary. Patrick is sturdy. If something is splayfoot and not vinegary then it is briton. Round things are sturdy. If Patrick is bituminoid and Patrick is port then Patrick is splayfoot. All sturdy things are bituminoid. If Antin is briton and Antin is port then Antin is not splayfoot. All bituminoid things are splayfoot. Patrick is port.", "logic": "\nnot Vinegary(antin)\nVinegary(ameline)\nSturdy(patrick)\nforall x (Splayfoot(x) and not Vinegary(x) -> Briton(x))\nforall x (Vinegary(x) -> Sturdy(x))\nBituminoid(patrick) and Port(patrick) -> Splayfoot(patrick)\nforall x (Sturdy(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nBriton(antin) and Port(antin) -> not Splayfoot(antin)\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\n\nPort(patrick)\n\nPort(patrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-331"} {"premises": "Wright is glutinous. Wright is ominous. Wright is cathartic. Wright is unskillful. Vanya is glutinous. Vanya is ominous. Vanya is pliant. Vanya is cathartic. Vanya is ireful. Vanya is unskillful. Young, pliant people are cathartic. All squeamish, ominous people are unskillful. If Wright is glutinous and Wright is ireful then Wright is unskillful. If someone is ireful then they are pliant. All unskillful people are ireful. All cathartic, ominous people are ireful. If someone is glutinous and pliant then they are squeamish. All ominous people are ireful. Vanya is pliant.", "logic": "\nGlutinous(wright)\nOminous(wright)\nCathartic(wright)\nUnskillful(wright)\nGlutinous(vanya)\nOminous(vanya)\nPliant(vanya)\nCathartic(vanya)\nIreful(vanya)\nUnskillful(vanya)\nforall x (Squeamish(x) and Pliant(x) -> Cathartic(x))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) and Ominous(x) -> Unskillful(x))\nGlutinous(wright) and Ireful(wright) -> Unskillful(wright)\nforall x (Ireful(x) -> Pliant(x))\nforall x (Unskillful(x) -> Ireful(x))\nforall x (Cathartic(x) and Ominous(x) -> Ireful(x))\nforall x (Glutinous(x) and Pliant(x) -> Squeamish(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) -> Ireful(x))\n\nPliant(vanya)\n\ntherefore Pliant(vanya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Vivienne is tripartite. Vivienne is eponymous. Vivienne is martian. Vivienne is vaulting. Katerina is tripartite. Katerina is eponymous. Katerina is stretchy. Katerina is martian. Katerina is wearying. Katerina is vaulting. Young, stretchy people are martian. All absent, eponymous people are vaulting. If Vivienne is tripartite and Vivienne is wearying then Vivienne is vaulting. If someone is wearying then they are stretchy. All vaulting people are wearying. All martian, eponymous people are wearying. If someone is tripartite and stretchy then they are absent. All eponymous people are wearying. Katerina is not stretchy.", "logic": "\nTripartite(vivienne)\nEponymous(vivienne)\nMartian(vivienne)\nVaulting(vivienne)\nTripartite(katerina)\nEponymous(katerina)\nStretchy(katerina)\nMartian(katerina)\nWearying(katerina)\nVaulting(katerina)\nforall x (Absent(x) and Stretchy(x) -> Martian(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Vaulting(x))\nTripartite(vivienne) and Wearying(vivienne) -> Vaulting(vivienne)\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Stretchy(x))\nforall x (Vaulting(x) -> Wearying(x))\nforall x (Martian(x) and Eponymous(x) -> Wearying(x))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and Stretchy(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) -> Wearying(x))\n\nnot Stretchy(katerina)\n\ntherefore Stretchy(katerina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Sibelle is egregious. Sibelle is flexuous. Sibelle is misogynous. Sibelle is lascivious. Josee is egregious. Josee is flexuous. Josee is septic. Josee is misogynous. Josee is rotated. Josee is lascivious. Young, septic people are misogynous. All kooky, flexuous people are lascivious. If Sibelle is egregious and Sibelle is rotated then Sibelle is lascivious. If someone is rotated then they are septic. All lascivious people are rotated. All misogynous, flexuous people are rotated. If someone is egregious and septic then they are kooky. All flexuous people are rotated. Josee is kooky.", "logic": "\nEgregious(sibelle)\nFlexuous(sibelle)\nMisogynous(sibelle)\nLascivious(sibelle)\nEgregious(josee)\nFlexuous(josee)\nSeptic(josee)\nMisogynous(josee)\nRotated(josee)\nLascivious(josee)\nforall x (Kooky(x) and Septic(x) -> Misogynous(x))\nforall x (Kooky(x) and Flexuous(x) -> Lascivious(x))\nEgregious(sibelle) and Rotated(sibelle) -> Lascivious(sibelle)\nforall x (Rotated(x) -> Septic(x))\nforall x (Lascivious(x) -> Rotated(x))\nforall x (Misogynous(x) and Flexuous(x) -> Rotated(x))\nforall x (Egregious(x) and Septic(x) -> Kooky(x))\nforall x (Flexuous(x) -> Rotated(x))\n\nKooky(josee)\n\nEgregious(josee) and Septic(josee) and forall x (Egregious(x) and Septic(x) -> Kooky(x)) -> therefore Kooky(josee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Vanna is garrulous. Vanna is unlabeled. Vanna is bowelless. Vanna is aided. Claire is garrulous. Claire is unlabeled. Claire is noetic. Claire is bowelless. Claire is indisposed. Claire is aided. Young, noetic people are bowelless. All strait, unlabeled people are aided. If Vanna is garrulous and Vanna is indisposed then Vanna is aided. If someone is indisposed then they are noetic. All aided people are indisposed. All bowelless, unlabeled people are indisposed. If someone is garrulous and noetic then they are strait. All unlabeled people are indisposed. Vanna is not indisposed.", "logic": "\nGarrulous(vanna)\nUnlabeled(vanna)\nBowelless(vanna)\nAided(vanna)\nGarrulous(claire)\nUnlabeled(claire)\nNoetic(claire)\nBowelless(claire)\nIndisposed(claire)\nAided(claire)\nforall x (Strait(x) and Noetic(x) -> Bowelless(x))\nforall x (Strait(x) and Unlabeled(x) -> Aided(x))\nGarrulous(vanna) and Indisposed(vanna) -> Aided(vanna)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) -> Noetic(x))\nforall x (Aided(x) -> Indisposed(x))\nforall x (Bowelless(x) and Unlabeled(x) -> Indisposed(x))\nforall x (Garrulous(x) and Noetic(x) -> Strait(x))\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) -> Indisposed(x))\n\nnot Indisposed(vanna)\n\nUnlabeled(vanna) and forall x (Unlabeled(x) -> Indisposed(x)) -> therefore Indisposed(vanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Janaya is unisexual. Janaya is worshipful. Janaya is unentitled. Janaya is dependent. Ginger is unisexual. Ginger is worshipful. Ginger is subtle. Ginger is unentitled. Ginger is aflicker. Ginger is dependent. Young, subtle people are unentitled. All bearable, worshipful people are dependent. If Janaya is unisexual and Janaya is aflicker then Janaya is dependent. If someone is aflicker then they are subtle. All dependent people are aflicker. All unentitled, worshipful people are aflicker. If someone is unisexual and subtle then they are bearable. All worshipful people are aflicker. Janaya is subtle.", "logic": "\nUnisexual(janaya)\nWorshipful(janaya)\nUnentitled(janaya)\nDependent(janaya)\nUnisexual(ginger)\nWorshipful(ginger)\nSubtle(ginger)\nUnentitled(ginger)\nAflicker(ginger)\nDependent(ginger)\nforall x (Bearable(x) and Subtle(x) -> Unentitled(x))\nforall x (Bearable(x) and Worshipful(x) -> Dependent(x))\nUnisexual(janaya) and Aflicker(janaya) -> Dependent(janaya)\nforall x (Aflicker(x) -> Subtle(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Aflicker(x))\nforall x (Unentitled(x) and Worshipful(x) -> Aflicker(x))\nforall x (Unisexual(x) and Subtle(x) -> Bearable(x))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Aflicker(x))\n\nSubtle(janaya)\n\nWorshipful(janaya) and forall x (Worshipful(x) -> Aflicker(x)) -> therefore Aflicker(janaya) Aflicker(janaya) and forall x (Aflicker(x) -> Subtle(x)) -> therefore Subtle(janaya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Cassandra is hugoesque. Cassandra is humorless. Cassandra is childly. Cassandra is centralist. Cornelle is hugoesque. Cornelle is humorless. Cornelle is geographic. Cornelle is childly. Cornelle is determined. Cornelle is centralist. Young, geographic people are childly. All stumpy, humorless people are centralist. If Cassandra is hugoesque and Cassandra is determined then Cassandra is centralist. If someone is determined then they are geographic. All centralist people are determined. All childly, humorless people are determined. If someone is hugoesque and geographic then they are stumpy. All humorless people are determined. Cassandra is not geographic.", "logic": "\nHugoesque(cassandra)\nHumorless(cassandra)\nChildly(cassandra)\nCentralist(cassandra)\nHugoesque(cornelle)\nHumorless(cornelle)\nGeographic(cornelle)\nChildly(cornelle)\nDetermined(cornelle)\nCentralist(cornelle)\nforall x (Stumpy(x) and Geographic(x) -> Childly(x))\nforall x (Stumpy(x) and Humorless(x) -> Centralist(x))\nHugoesque(cassandra) and Determined(cassandra) -> Centralist(cassandra)\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Centralist(x) -> Determined(x))\nforall x (Childly(x) and Humorless(x) -> Determined(x))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) and Geographic(x) -> Stumpy(x))\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Determined(x))\n\nnot Geographic(cassandra)\n\nHumorless(cassandra) and forall x (Humorless(x) -> Determined(x)) -> therefore Determined(cassandra) Determined(cassandra) and forall x (Determined(x) -> Geographic(x)) -> therefore Geographic(cassandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Nonnah is acentric. Nonnah is syrupy. Nonnah is fourfold. Nonnah is sewn. Diannne is acentric. Diannne is syrupy. Diannne is coupled. Diannne is fourfold. Diannne is trusted. Diannne is sewn. Young, coupled people are fourfold. All nursed, syrupy people are sewn. If Nonnah is acentric and Nonnah is trusted then Nonnah is sewn. If someone is trusted then they are coupled. All sewn people are trusted. All fourfold, syrupy people are trusted. If someone is acentric and coupled then they are nursed. All syrupy people are trusted. Nonnah is nursed.", "logic": "\nAcentric(nonnah)\nSyrupy(nonnah)\nFourfold(nonnah)\nSewn(nonnah)\nAcentric(diannne)\nSyrupy(diannne)\nCoupled(diannne)\nFourfold(diannne)\nTrusted(diannne)\nSewn(diannne)\nforall x (Nursed(x) and Coupled(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nforall x (Nursed(x) and Syrupy(x) -> Sewn(x))\nAcentric(nonnah) and Trusted(nonnah) -> Sewn(nonnah)\nforall x (Trusted(x) -> Coupled(x))\nforall x (Sewn(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Fourfold(x) and Syrupy(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Acentric(x) and Coupled(x) -> Nursed(x))\nforall x (Syrupy(x) -> Trusted(x))\n\nNursed(nonnah)\n\nSyrupy(nonnah) and forall x (Syrupy(x) -> Trusted(x)) -> therefore Trusted(nonnah) Trusted(nonnah) and forall x (Trusted(x) -> Coupled(x)) -> therefore Coupled(nonnah) Acentric(nonnah) and Coupled(nonnah) and forall x (Acentric(x) and Coupled(x) -> Nursed(x)) -> therefore Nursed(nonnah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Alwin is silverish. Alwin is sized. Alwin is alleviated. Alwin is bicolored. Xavier is silverish. Xavier is sized. Xavier is seductive. Xavier is alleviated. Xavier is apocarpous. Xavier is bicolored. Young, seductive people are alleviated. All humid, sized people are bicolored. If Alwin is silverish and Alwin is apocarpous then Alwin is bicolored. If someone is apocarpous then they are seductive. All bicolored people are apocarpous. All alleviated, sized people are apocarpous. If someone is silverish and seductive then they are humid. All sized people are apocarpous. Alwin is not humid.", "logic": "\nSilverish(alwin)\nSized(alwin)\nAlleviated(alwin)\nBicolored(alwin)\nSilverish(xavier)\nSized(xavier)\nSeductive(xavier)\nAlleviated(xavier)\nApocarpous(xavier)\nBicolored(xavier)\nforall x (Humid(x) and Seductive(x) -> Alleviated(x))\nforall x (Humid(x) and Sized(x) -> Bicolored(x))\nSilverish(alwin) and Apocarpous(alwin) -> Bicolored(alwin)\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Seductive(x))\nforall x (Bicolored(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Alleviated(x) and Sized(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Silverish(x) and Seductive(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Sized(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\n\nnot Humid(alwin)\n\nSized(alwin) and forall x (Sized(x) -> Apocarpous(x)) -> therefore Apocarpous(alwin) Apocarpous(alwin) and forall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Seductive(x)) -> therefore Seductive(alwin) Silverish(alwin) and Seductive(alwin) and forall x (Silverish(x) and Seductive(x) -> Humid(x)) -> therefore Humid(alwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Maddie is placed. Angel is placed. Sallie is placed. Teddi is pretorian. Blue people are egocentric. Blue people are guardant. If someone is guardant then they are pouchlike. Cold, placed people are not pouchlike. If Angel is impatient and Angel is pretorian then Angel is placed. All buccal people are not impatient. Sallie is placed.", "logic": "\nPlaced(maddie)\nPlaced(angel)\nPlaced(sallie)\nPretorian(teddi)\nforall x (Impatient(x) -> Egocentric(x))\nforall x (Impatient(x) -> Guardant(x))\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Pouchlike(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and Placed(x) -> not Pouchlike(x))\nImpatient(angel) and Pretorian(angel) -> Placed(angel)\nforall x (Buccal(x) -> not Impatient(x))\n\nPlaced(sallie)\n\ntherefore Placed(sallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2065"} {"premises": "Bartolemo is saporous. Scarlet is saporous. Jaquith is saporous. Herby is unpunctual. Blue people are unbordered. Blue people are methodical. If someone is methodical then they are depilous. Cold, saporous people are not depilous. If Scarlet is perirhinal and Scarlet is unpunctual then Scarlet is saporous. All repressing people are not perirhinal. Scarlet is not saporous.", "logic": "\nSaporous(bartolemo)\nSaporous(scarlet)\nSaporous(jaquith)\nUnpunctual(herby)\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Unbordered(x))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Depilous(x))\nforall x (Unbordered(x) and Saporous(x) -> not Depilous(x))\nPerirhinal(scarlet) and Unpunctual(scarlet) -> Saporous(scarlet)\nforall x (Repressing(x) -> not Perirhinal(x))\n\nnot Saporous(scarlet)\n\ntherefore Saporous(scarlet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2065"} {"premises": "Lolita is facile. Gustavo is facile. Nerti is facile. Abigael is moresque. Blue people are stated. Blue people are mucky. If someone is mucky then they are crotchety. Cold, facile people are not crotchety. If Gustavo is ironclad and Gustavo is moresque then Gustavo is facile. All decadent people are not ironclad. Lolita is not stated.", "logic": "\nFacile(lolita)\nFacile(gustavo)\nFacile(nerti)\nMoresque(abigael)\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Mucky(x) -> Crotchety(x))\nforall x (Stated(x) and Facile(x) -> not Crotchety(x))\nIronclad(gustavo) and Moresque(gustavo) -> Facile(gustavo)\nforall x (Decadent(x) -> not Ironclad(x))\n\nnot Stated(lolita)\n\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Stated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2065"} {"premises": "Hilbert is vindicated. Rozamond is vindicated. Nahum is vindicated. Halli is floaty. Blue people are exergonic. Blue people are meridional. If someone is meridional then they are uniovular. Cold, vindicated people are not uniovular. If Rozamond is diabolic and Rozamond is floaty then Rozamond is vindicated. All fruity people are not diabolic. Nahum is floaty.", "logic": "\nVindicated(hilbert)\nVindicated(rozamond)\nVindicated(nahum)\nFloaty(halli)\nforall x (Diabolic(x) -> Exergonic(x))\nforall x (Diabolic(x) -> Meridional(x))\nforall x (Meridional(x) -> Uniovular(x))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) and Vindicated(x) -> not Uniovular(x))\nDiabolic(rozamond) and Floaty(rozamond) -> Vindicated(rozamond)\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> not Diabolic(x))\n\nFloaty(nahum)\n\nFloaty(nahum) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2065"} {"premises": "The rufus is steep. The rufus retrogress the sella. The pooh cooccur the sella. The pooh is analeptic. The pooh retrogress the rufus. The pooh perform the sella. The sella cooccur the rufus. If something retrogress the sella then it perform the pooh. If something is illiberal and goodly then it cooccur the pooh. If something perform the pooh then it retrogress the pooh. The pooh retrogress the rufus.", "logic": "\nSteep(rufus)\nRetrogress(rufus, sella)\nCooccur(pooh, sella)\nAnaleptic(pooh)\nRetrogress(pooh, rufus)\nPerform(pooh, sella)\nCooccur(sella, rufus)\nforall x (Retrogress(x, sella) -> Perform(x, pooh))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) and Goodly(x) -> Cooccur(x, pooh))\nforall x (Perform(x, pooh) -> Retrogress(x, pooh))\n\nRetrogress(pooh, rufus)\n\ntherefore Retrogress(pooh, rufus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The linet is flying. The linet ticktock the dickey. The lotte sadden the dickey. The lotte is juristic. The lotte ticktock the linet. The lotte subedit the dickey. The dickey sadden the linet. If something ticktock the dickey then it subedit the lotte. If something is matronly and pungent then it sadden the lotte. If something subedit the lotte then it ticktock the lotte. The lotte is not juristic.", "logic": "\nFlying(linet)\nTicktock(linet, dickey)\nSadden(lotte, dickey)\nJuristic(lotte)\nTicktock(lotte, linet)\nSubedit(lotte, dickey)\nSadden(dickey, linet)\nforall x (Ticktock(x, dickey) -> Subedit(x, lotte))\nforall x (Matronly(x) and Pungent(x) -> Sadden(x, lotte))\nforall x (Subedit(x, lotte) -> Ticktock(x, lotte))\n\nnot Juristic(lotte)\n\ntherefore Juristic(lotte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The mollie is tubal. The mollie raze the weylin. The mae pool the weylin. The mae is different. The mae raze the mollie. The mae discommode the weylin. The weylin pool the mollie. If something raze the weylin then it discommode the mae. If something is groping and outer then it pool the mae. If something discommode the mae then it raze the mae. The mollie discommode the mae.", "logic": "\nTubal(mollie)\nRaze(mollie, weylin)\nPool(mae, weylin)\nDifferent(mae)\nRaze(mae, mollie)\nDiscommode(mae, weylin)\nPool(weylin, mollie)\nforall x (Raze(x, weylin) -> Discommode(x, mae))\nforall x (Groping(x) and Outer(x) -> Pool(x, mae))\nforall x (Discommode(x, mae) -> Raze(x, mae))\n\nDiscommode(mollie, mae)\n\nRaze(mollie, weylin) and forall x (Raze(x, weylin) -> Discommode(x, mae)) -> therefore Discommode(mollie, mae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The hart is mandibular. The hart brave the janella. The emmi lambaste the janella. The emmi is precious. The emmi brave the hart. The emmi bacterise the janella. The janella lambaste the hart. If something brave the janella then it bacterise the emmi. If something is fewer and lineal then it lambaste the emmi. If something bacterise the emmi then it brave the emmi. The hart does not visit the emmi.", "logic": "\nMandibular(hart)\nBrave(hart, janella)\nLambaste(emmi, janella)\nPrecious(emmi)\nBrave(emmi, hart)\nBacterise(emmi, janella)\nLambaste(janella, hart)\nforall x (Brave(x, janella) -> Bacterise(x, emmi))\nforall x (Fewer(x) and Lineal(x) -> Lambaste(x, emmi))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, emmi) -> Brave(x, emmi))\n\nnot Bacterise(hart, emmi)\n\nBrave(hart, janella) and forall x (Brave(x, janella) -> Bacterise(x, emmi)) -> therefore Bacterise(hart, emmi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The milzie is swagger. The milzie alliterate the hadleigh. The garret scorch the hadleigh. The garret is allotted. The garret alliterate the milzie. The garret saccharify the hadleigh. The hadleigh scorch the milzie. If something alliterate the hadleigh then it saccharify the garret. If something is ankylotic and subgross then it scorch the garret. If something saccharify the garret then it alliterate the garret. The milzie alliterate the garret.", "logic": "\nSwagger(milzie)\nAlliterate(milzie, hadleigh)\nScorch(garret, hadleigh)\nAllotted(garret)\nAlliterate(garret, milzie)\nSaccharify(garret, hadleigh)\nScorch(hadleigh, milzie)\nforall x (Alliterate(x, hadleigh) -> Saccharify(x, garret))\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) and Subgross(x) -> Scorch(x, garret))\nforall x (Saccharify(x, garret) -> Alliterate(x, garret))\n\nAlliterate(milzie, garret)\n\nAlliterate(milzie, hadleigh) and forall x (Alliterate(x, hadleigh) -> Saccharify(x, garret)) -> therefore Saccharify(milzie, garret) Saccharify(milzie, garret) and forall x (Saccharify(x, garret) -> Alliterate(x, garret)) -> therefore Alliterate(milzie, garret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The frieda is angelic. The frieda squint the madalyn. The denyse spout the madalyn. The denyse is organized. The denyse squint the frieda. The denyse abscise the madalyn. The madalyn spout the frieda. If something squint the madalyn then it abscise the denyse. If something is frisian and migratory then it spout the denyse. If something abscise the denyse then it squint the denyse. The frieda does not like the denyse.", "logic": "\nAngelic(frieda)\nSquint(frieda, madalyn)\nSpout(denyse, madalyn)\nOrganized(denyse)\nSquint(denyse, frieda)\nAbscise(denyse, madalyn)\nSpout(madalyn, frieda)\nforall x (Squint(x, madalyn) -> Abscise(x, denyse))\nforall x (Frisian(x) and Migratory(x) -> Spout(x, denyse))\nforall x (Abscise(x, denyse) -> Squint(x, denyse))\n\nnot Squint(frieda, denyse)\n\nSquint(frieda, madalyn) and forall x (Squint(x, madalyn) -> Abscise(x, denyse)) -> therefore Abscise(frieda, denyse) Abscise(frieda, denyse) and forall x (Abscise(x, denyse) -> Squint(x, denyse)) -> therefore Squint(frieda, denyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The dorri is antiphonal. The dorri arraign the matilde. The mari freewheel the matilde. The mari is crocketed. The mari arraign the dorri. The mari scum the matilde. The matilde freewheel the dorri. If something arraign the matilde then it scum the mari. If something is doting and isopteran then it freewheel the mari. If something scum the mari then it arraign the mari. The mari does not like the mari.", "logic": "\nAntiphonal(dorri)\nArraign(dorri, matilde)\nFreewheel(mari, matilde)\nCrocketed(mari)\nArraign(mari, dorri)\nScum(mari, matilde)\nFreewheel(matilde, dorri)\nforall x (Arraign(x, matilde) -> Scum(x, mari))\nforall x (Doting(x) and Isopteran(x) -> Freewheel(x, mari))\nforall x (Scum(x, mari) -> Arraign(x, mari))\n\nnot Arraign(mari, mari)\n\nforall x (Scum(x, mari) -> Arraign(x, mari)) <- forall x (Arraign(x, matilde) -> Scum(x, mari)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The myna is departed. The myna abdicate the twila. The cissy reproduce the twila. The cissy is astronomic. The cissy abdicate the myna. The cissy airt the twila. The twila reproduce the myna. If something abdicate the twila then it airt the cissy. If something is duckbill and projecting then it reproduce the cissy. If something airt the cissy then it abdicate the cissy. The cissy airt the cissy.", "logic": "\nDeparted(myna)\nAbdicate(myna, twila)\nReproduce(cissy, twila)\nAstronomic(cissy)\nAbdicate(cissy, myna)\nAirt(cissy, twila)\nReproduce(twila, myna)\nforall x (Abdicate(x, twila) -> Airt(x, cissy))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) and Projecting(x) -> Reproduce(x, cissy))\nforall x (Airt(x, cissy) -> Abdicate(x, cissy))\n\nAirt(cissy, cissy)\n\nforall x (Abdicate(x, twila) -> Airt(x, cissy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The deva is coccoid. The deva intone the roderic. The vincents curb the roderic. The vincents is sinewy. The vincents intone the deva. The vincents intercept the roderic. The roderic curb the deva. If something intone the roderic then it intercept the vincents. If something is titulary and braised then it curb the vincents. If something intercept the vincents then it intone the vincents. The deva does not chase the vincents.", "logic": "\nCoccoid(deva)\nIntone(deva, roderic)\nCurb(vincents, roderic)\nSinewy(vincents)\nIntone(vincents, deva)\nIntercept(vincents, roderic)\nCurb(roderic, deva)\nforall x (Intone(x, roderic) -> Intercept(x, vincents))\nforall x (Titulary(x) and Braised(x) -> Curb(x, vincents))\nforall x (Intercept(x, vincents) -> Intone(x, vincents))\n\nnot Curb(deva, vincents)\n\nforall x (Titulary(x) and Braised(x) -> Curb(x, vincents)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The almeria is neoclassic. The almeria overshadow the jeniffer. The beaufort cannulate the jeniffer. The beaufort is seaward. The beaufort overshadow the almeria. The beaufort prelude the jeniffer. The jeniffer cannulate the almeria. If something overshadow the jeniffer then it prelude the beaufort. If something is pressed and defined then it cannulate the beaufort. If something prelude the beaufort then it overshadow the beaufort. The jeniffer prelude the jeniffer.", "logic": "\nNeoclassic(almeria)\nOvershadow(almeria, jeniffer)\nCannulate(beaufort, jeniffer)\nSeaward(beaufort)\nOvershadow(beaufort, almeria)\nPrelude(beaufort, jeniffer)\nCannulate(jeniffer, almeria)\nforall x (Overshadow(x, jeniffer) -> Prelude(x, beaufort))\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Defined(x) -> Cannulate(x, beaufort))\nforall x (Prelude(x, beaufort) -> Overshadow(x, beaufort))\n\nPrelude(jeniffer, jeniffer)\n\nPrelude(jeniffer, jeniffer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The maxy is pockmarked. The maxy indorse the rikki. The siobhan thrum the rikki. The siobhan is dandified. The siobhan indorse the maxy. The siobhan forefend the rikki. The rikki thrum the maxy. If something indorse the rikki then it forefend the siobhan. If something is apostate and sinhalese then it thrum the siobhan. If something forefend the siobhan then it indorse the siobhan. The maxy does not visit the maxy.", "logic": "\nPockmarked(maxy)\nIndorse(maxy, rikki)\nThrum(siobhan, rikki)\nDandified(siobhan)\nIndorse(siobhan, maxy)\nForefend(siobhan, rikki)\nThrum(rikki, maxy)\nforall x (Indorse(x, rikki) -> Forefend(x, siobhan))\nforall x (Apostate(x) and Sinhalese(x) -> Thrum(x, siobhan))\nforall x (Forefend(x, siobhan) -> Indorse(x, siobhan))\n\nnot Forefend(maxy, maxy)\n\nnot Forefend(maxy, maxy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "The shellie is sublimed. The shellie confer the pasquale. The durante depolarise the pasquale. The durante is asinine. The durante confer the shellie. The durante meow the pasquale. The pasquale depolarise the shellie. If something confer the pasquale then it meow the durante. If something is acuate and childlike then it depolarise the durante. If something meow the durante then it confer the durante. The pasquale is childlike.", "logic": "\nSublimed(shellie)\nConfer(shellie, pasquale)\nDepolarise(durante, pasquale)\nAsinine(durante)\nConfer(durante, shellie)\nMeow(durante, pasquale)\nDepolarise(pasquale, shellie)\nforall x (Confer(x, pasquale) -> Meow(x, durante))\nforall x (Acuate(x) and Childlike(x) -> Depolarise(x, durante))\nforall x (Meow(x, durante) -> Confer(x, durante))\n\nChildlike(pasquale)\n\nChildlike(pasquale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1738"} {"premises": "Ilene is weakly. All concentric people are weakly. Nice, appeasable people are resinated. If someone is enlarged and not resinated then they are stilted. Ilene is weakly.", "logic": "\nWeakly(ilene)\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> Weakly(x))\nforall x (Supposable(x) and Appeasable(x) -> Resinated(x))\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and not Resinated(x) -> Stilted(x))\n\nWeakly(ilene)\n\ntherefore Weakly(ilene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7180"} {"premises": "Marlow is altissimo. All rhizoidal people are altissimo. Nice, fungoid people are bimetal. If someone is irresolute and not bimetal then they are clogging. Marlow is not altissimo.", "logic": "\nAltissimo(marlow)\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) -> Altissimo(x))\nforall x (Algid(x) and Fungoid(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Irresolute(x) and not Bimetal(x) -> Clogging(x))\n\nnot Altissimo(marlow)\n\ntherefore Altissimo(marlow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7180"} {"premises": "Sella is amative. All fledgeling people are amative. Nice, roughhewn people are subjacent. If someone is authentic and not subjacent then they are affective. Sella is not affective.", "logic": "\nAmative(sella)\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) -> Amative(x))\nforall x (Redeemed(x) and Roughhewn(x) -> Subjacent(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and not Subjacent(x) -> Affective(x))\n\nnot Affective(sella)\n\nforall x (Authentic(x) and not Subjacent(x) -> Affective(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7180"} {"premises": "Angy is cognizant. All lettered people are cognizant. Nice, sensitised people are basilar. If someone is volumetric and not basilar then they are motherlike. Angy is sensitised.", "logic": "\nCognizant(angy)\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Cognizant(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) and Sensitised(x) -> Basilar(x))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) and not Basilar(x) -> Motherlike(x))\n\nSensitised(angy)\n\nSensitised(angy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7180"} {"premises": "Ceciley is reliable. Ceciley is iodinating. Ceciley is delineated. Ceciley is inured. Ceciley is incumbent. Kirsten is reliable. Kirsten is lowborn. Kirsten is unwedded. Kirsten is inured. Kirsten is incumbent. Zsazsa is incumbent. Marcelia is reliable. Marcelia is iodinating. Marcelia is lowborn. Marcelia is inured. If someone is inured then they are incumbent. All delineated people are inured. Red people are unwedded. White people are delineated. If Marcelia is delineated then Marcelia is incumbent. If Kirsten is iodinating then Kirsten is delineated. If Zsazsa is iodinating and Zsazsa is incumbent then Zsazsa is inured. If someone is iodinating then they are lowborn. Ceciley is delineated.", "logic": "\nReliable(ceciley)\nIodinating(ceciley)\nDelineated(ceciley)\nInured(ceciley)\nIncumbent(ceciley)\nReliable(kirsten)\nLowborn(kirsten)\nUnwedded(kirsten)\nInured(kirsten)\nIncumbent(kirsten)\nIncumbent(zsazsa)\nReliable(marcelia)\nIodinating(marcelia)\nLowborn(marcelia)\nInured(marcelia)\nforall x (Inured(x) -> Incumbent(x))\nforall x (Delineated(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Delineated(x) -> Unwedded(x))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) -> Delineated(x))\nDelineated(marcelia) -> Incumbent(marcelia)\nIodinating(kirsten) -> Delineated(kirsten)\nIodinating(zsazsa) and Incumbent(zsazsa) -> Inured(zsazsa)\nforall x (Iodinating(x) -> Lowborn(x))\n\nDelineated(ceciley)\n\ntherefore Delineated(ceciley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Dianna is nitwitted. Dianna is anglican. Dianna is clean. Dianna is epithelial. Dianna is choky. Wilone is nitwitted. Wilone is trite. Wilone is greased. Wilone is epithelial. Wilone is choky. Kellen is choky. Jerzy is nitwitted. Jerzy is anglican. Jerzy is trite. Jerzy is epithelial. If someone is epithelial then they are choky. All clean people are epithelial. Red people are greased. White people are clean. If Jerzy is clean then Jerzy is choky. If Wilone is anglican then Wilone is clean. If Kellen is anglican and Kellen is choky then Kellen is epithelial. If someone is anglican then they are trite. Jerzy is not trite.", "logic": "\nNitwitted(dianna)\nAnglican(dianna)\nClean(dianna)\nEpithelial(dianna)\nChoky(dianna)\nNitwitted(wilone)\nTrite(wilone)\nGreased(wilone)\nEpithelial(wilone)\nChoky(wilone)\nChoky(kellen)\nNitwitted(jerzy)\nAnglican(jerzy)\nTrite(jerzy)\nEpithelial(jerzy)\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> Choky(x))\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Clean(x) -> Greased(x))\nforall x (Choky(x) -> Clean(x))\nClean(jerzy) -> Choky(jerzy)\nAnglican(wilone) -> Clean(wilone)\nAnglican(kellen) and Choky(kellen) -> Epithelial(kellen)\nforall x (Anglican(x) -> Trite(x))\n\nnot Trite(jerzy)\n\ntherefore Trite(jerzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Janos is schmaltzy. Janos is zaftig. Janos is untwisted. Janos is napping. Janos is unfree. Bernetta is schmaltzy. Bernetta is mucoid. Bernetta is timorese. Bernetta is napping. Bernetta is unfree. Simona is unfree. Morrie is schmaltzy. Morrie is zaftig. Morrie is mucoid. Morrie is napping. If someone is napping then they are unfree. All untwisted people are napping. Red people are timorese. White people are untwisted. If Morrie is untwisted then Morrie is unfree. If Bernetta is zaftig then Bernetta is untwisted. If Simona is zaftig and Simona is unfree then Simona is napping. If someone is zaftig then they are mucoid. Bernetta is untwisted.", "logic": "\nSchmaltzy(janos)\nZaftig(janos)\nUntwisted(janos)\nNapping(janos)\nUnfree(janos)\nSchmaltzy(bernetta)\nMucoid(bernetta)\nTimorese(bernetta)\nNapping(bernetta)\nUnfree(bernetta)\nUnfree(simona)\nSchmaltzy(morrie)\nZaftig(morrie)\nMucoid(morrie)\nNapping(morrie)\nforall x (Napping(x) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Napping(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) -> Timorese(x))\nforall x (Unfree(x) -> Untwisted(x))\nUntwisted(morrie) -> Unfree(morrie)\nZaftig(bernetta) -> Untwisted(bernetta)\nZaftig(simona) and Unfree(simona) -> Napping(simona)\nforall x (Zaftig(x) -> Mucoid(x))\n\nUntwisted(bernetta)\n\nUnfree(bernetta) and forall x (Unfree(x) -> Untwisted(x)) -> therefore Untwisted(bernetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Chastity is monogamous. Chastity is sickly. Chastity is reductive. Chastity is bouffant. Chastity is offstage. Aretha is monogamous. Aretha is overstated. Aretha is allocable. Aretha is bouffant. Aretha is offstage. Ciel is offstage. Blair is monogamous. Blair is sickly. Blair is overstated. Blair is bouffant. If someone is bouffant then they are offstage. All reductive people are bouffant. Red people are allocable. White people are reductive. If Blair is reductive then Blair is offstage. If Aretha is sickly then Aretha is reductive. If Ciel is sickly and Ciel is offstage then Ciel is bouffant. If someone is sickly then they are overstated. Ciel is not reductive.", "logic": "\nMonogamous(chastity)\nSickly(chastity)\nReductive(chastity)\nBouffant(chastity)\nOffstage(chastity)\nMonogamous(aretha)\nOverstated(aretha)\nAllocable(aretha)\nBouffant(aretha)\nOffstage(aretha)\nOffstage(ciel)\nMonogamous(blair)\nSickly(blair)\nOverstated(blair)\nBouffant(blair)\nforall x (Bouffant(x) -> Offstage(x))\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Bouffant(x))\nforall x (Reductive(x) -> Allocable(x))\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Reductive(x))\nReductive(blair) -> Offstage(blair)\nSickly(aretha) -> Reductive(aretha)\nSickly(ciel) and Offstage(ciel) -> Bouffant(ciel)\nforall x (Sickly(x) -> Overstated(x))\n\nnot Reductive(ciel)\n\nOffstage(ciel) and forall x (Offstage(x) -> Reductive(x)) -> therefore Reductive(ciel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Waiter is nippy. Waiter is darling. Waiter is piggy. Waiter is heretical. Waiter is sharpened. Esther is nippy. Esther is overnice. Esther is colorectal. Esther is heretical. Esther is sharpened. Erich is sharpened. Emmalee is nippy. Emmalee is darling. Emmalee is overnice. Emmalee is heretical. If someone is heretical then they are sharpened. All piggy people are heretical. Red people are colorectal. White people are piggy. If Emmalee is piggy then Emmalee is sharpened. If Esther is darling then Esther is piggy. If Erich is darling and Erich is sharpened then Erich is heretical. If someone is darling then they are overnice. Erich is colorectal.", "logic": "\nNippy(waiter)\nDarling(waiter)\nPiggy(waiter)\nHeretical(waiter)\nSharpened(waiter)\nNippy(esther)\nOvernice(esther)\nColorectal(esther)\nHeretical(esther)\nSharpened(esther)\nSharpened(erich)\nNippy(emmalee)\nDarling(emmalee)\nOvernice(emmalee)\nHeretical(emmalee)\nforall x (Heretical(x) -> Sharpened(x))\nforall x (Piggy(x) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Piggy(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) -> Piggy(x))\nPiggy(emmalee) -> Sharpened(emmalee)\nDarling(esther) -> Piggy(esther)\nDarling(erich) and Sharpened(erich) -> Heretical(erich)\nforall x (Darling(x) -> Overnice(x))\n\nColorectal(erich)\n\nSharpened(erich) and forall x (Sharpened(x) -> Piggy(x)) -> therefore Piggy(erich) Piggy(erich) and forall x (Piggy(x) -> Colorectal(x)) -> therefore Colorectal(erich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Marcy is ensuing. Marcy is bespoken. Marcy is allogeneic. Marcy is hotheaded. Marcy is lank. Selia is ensuing. Selia is slippy. Selia is guided. Selia is hotheaded. Selia is lank. Merralee is lank. Benedikta is ensuing. Benedikta is bespoken. Benedikta is slippy. Benedikta is hotheaded. If someone is hotheaded then they are lank. All allogeneic people are hotheaded. Red people are guided. White people are allogeneic. If Benedikta is allogeneic then Benedikta is lank. If Selia is bespoken then Selia is allogeneic. If Merralee is bespoken and Merralee is lank then Merralee is hotheaded. If someone is bespoken then they are slippy. Benedikta is not allogeneic.", "logic": "\nEnsuing(marcy)\nBespoken(marcy)\nAllogeneic(marcy)\nHotheaded(marcy)\nLank(marcy)\nEnsuing(selia)\nSlippy(selia)\nGuided(selia)\nHotheaded(selia)\nLank(selia)\nLank(merralee)\nEnsuing(benedikta)\nBespoken(benedikta)\nSlippy(benedikta)\nHotheaded(benedikta)\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Lank(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Hotheaded(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nAllogeneic(benedikta) -> Lank(benedikta)\nBespoken(selia) -> Allogeneic(selia)\nBespoken(merralee) and Lank(merralee) -> Hotheaded(merralee)\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Slippy(x))\n\nnot Allogeneic(benedikta)\n\nHotheaded(benedikta) and forall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Lank(x)) -> therefore Lank(benedikta) Lank(benedikta) and forall x (Lank(x) -> Allogeneic(x)) -> therefore Allogeneic(benedikta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Sybila is pandemic. Sybila is dried. Sybila is eclectic. Sybila is peaceful. Sybila is innocuous. Derrol is pandemic. Derrol is opencut. Derrol is throated. Derrol is peaceful. Derrol is innocuous. Roth is innocuous. Twyla is pandemic. Twyla is dried. Twyla is opencut. Twyla is peaceful. If someone is peaceful then they are innocuous. All eclectic people are peaceful. Red people are throated. White people are eclectic. If Twyla is eclectic then Twyla is innocuous. If Derrol is dried then Derrol is eclectic. If Roth is dried and Roth is innocuous then Roth is peaceful. If someone is dried then they are opencut. Twyla is throated.", "logic": "\nPandemic(sybila)\nDried(sybila)\nEclectic(sybila)\nPeaceful(sybila)\nInnocuous(sybila)\nPandemic(derrol)\nOpencut(derrol)\nThroated(derrol)\nPeaceful(derrol)\nInnocuous(derrol)\nInnocuous(roth)\nPandemic(twyla)\nDried(twyla)\nOpencut(twyla)\nPeaceful(twyla)\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Innocuous(x))\nforall x (Eclectic(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Eclectic(x) -> Throated(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) -> Eclectic(x))\nEclectic(twyla) -> Innocuous(twyla)\nDried(derrol) -> Eclectic(derrol)\nDried(roth) and Innocuous(roth) -> Peaceful(roth)\nforall x (Dried(x) -> Opencut(x))\n\nThroated(twyla)\n\nPeaceful(twyla) and forall x (Peaceful(x) -> Innocuous(x)) -> therefore Innocuous(twyla) Innocuous(twyla) and forall x (Innocuous(x) -> Eclectic(x)) -> therefore Eclectic(twyla) Eclectic(twyla) and forall x (Eclectic(x) -> Throated(x)) -> therefore Throated(twyla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Marj is lapidary. Marj is mystified. Marj is nebulose. Marj is perfumed. Marj is broadnosed. Henderson is lapidary. Henderson is outfitted. Henderson is silklike. Henderson is perfumed. Henderson is broadnosed. Janenna is broadnosed. Caprice is lapidary. Caprice is mystified. Caprice is outfitted. Caprice is perfumed. If someone is perfumed then they are broadnosed. All nebulose people are perfumed. Red people are silklike. White people are nebulose. If Caprice is nebulose then Caprice is broadnosed. If Henderson is mystified then Henderson is nebulose. If Janenna is mystified and Janenna is broadnosed then Janenna is perfumed. If someone is mystified then they are outfitted. Caprice is not silklike.", "logic": "\nLapidary(marj)\nMystified(marj)\nNebulose(marj)\nPerfumed(marj)\nBroadnosed(marj)\nLapidary(henderson)\nOutfitted(henderson)\nSilklike(henderson)\nPerfumed(henderson)\nBroadnosed(henderson)\nBroadnosed(janenna)\nLapidary(caprice)\nMystified(caprice)\nOutfitted(caprice)\nPerfumed(caprice)\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Nebulose(x) -> Perfumed(x))\nforall x (Nebulose(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Broadnosed(x) -> Nebulose(x))\nNebulose(caprice) -> Broadnosed(caprice)\nMystified(henderson) -> Nebulose(henderson)\nMystified(janenna) and Broadnosed(janenna) -> Perfumed(janenna)\nforall x (Mystified(x) -> Outfitted(x))\n\nnot Silklike(caprice)\n\nPerfumed(caprice) and forall x (Perfumed(x) -> Broadnosed(x)) -> therefore Broadnosed(caprice) Broadnosed(caprice) and forall x (Broadnosed(x) -> Nebulose(x)) -> therefore Nebulose(caprice) Nebulose(caprice) and forall x (Nebulose(x) -> Silklike(x)) -> therefore Silklike(caprice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Shayna is eclectic. Shayna is weepy. Shayna is certified. Shayna is anachronic. Shayna is schmalzy. Kimball is eclectic. Kimball is endocrinal. Kimball is pyramidic. Kimball is anachronic. Kimball is schmalzy. Everard is schmalzy. Libby is eclectic. Libby is weepy. Libby is endocrinal. Libby is anachronic. If someone is anachronic then they are schmalzy. All certified people are anachronic. Red people are pyramidic. White people are certified. If Libby is certified then Libby is schmalzy. If Kimball is weepy then Kimball is certified. If Everard is weepy and Everard is schmalzy then Everard is anachronic. If someone is weepy then they are endocrinal. Everard is not endocrinal.", "logic": "\nEclectic(shayna)\nWeepy(shayna)\nCertified(shayna)\nAnachronic(shayna)\nSchmalzy(shayna)\nEclectic(kimball)\nEndocrinal(kimball)\nPyramidic(kimball)\nAnachronic(kimball)\nSchmalzy(kimball)\nSchmalzy(everard)\nEclectic(libby)\nWeepy(libby)\nEndocrinal(libby)\nAnachronic(libby)\nforall x (Anachronic(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Anachronic(x))\nforall x (Certified(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nforall x (Schmalzy(x) -> Certified(x))\nCertified(libby) -> Schmalzy(libby)\nWeepy(kimball) -> Certified(kimball)\nWeepy(everard) and Schmalzy(everard) -> Anachronic(everard)\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Endocrinal(x))\n\nnot Endocrinal(everard)\n\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Endocrinal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Marley is napoleonic. Marley is scrivened. Marley is budgetary. Marley is subdural. Marley is pilose. Marlow is napoleonic. Marlow is anonymous. Marlow is apetalous. Marlow is subdural. Marlow is pilose. Violetta is pilose. Tisha is napoleonic. Tisha is scrivened. Tisha is anonymous. Tisha is subdural. If someone is subdural then they are pilose. All budgetary people are subdural. Red people are apetalous. White people are budgetary. If Tisha is budgetary then Tisha is pilose. If Marlow is scrivened then Marlow is budgetary. If Violetta is scrivened and Violetta is pilose then Violetta is subdural. If someone is scrivened then they are anonymous. Violetta is scrivened.", "logic": "\nNapoleonic(marley)\nScrivened(marley)\nBudgetary(marley)\nSubdural(marley)\nPilose(marley)\nNapoleonic(marlow)\nAnonymous(marlow)\nApetalous(marlow)\nSubdural(marlow)\nPilose(marlow)\nPilose(violetta)\nNapoleonic(tisha)\nScrivened(tisha)\nAnonymous(tisha)\nSubdural(tisha)\nforall x (Subdural(x) -> Pilose(x))\nforall x (Budgetary(x) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Budgetary(x) -> Apetalous(x))\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Budgetary(x))\nBudgetary(tisha) -> Pilose(tisha)\nScrivened(marlow) -> Budgetary(marlow)\nScrivened(violetta) and Pilose(violetta) -> Subdural(violetta)\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Anonymous(x))\n\nScrivened(violetta)\n\nScrivened(violetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Salome is following. Salome is liturgical. Salome is moroccan. Salome is tantric. Salome is bifilar. Dominick is following. Dominick is shagged. Dominick is bottomed. Dominick is tantric. Dominick is bifilar. Kelsey is bifilar. Amabelle is following. Amabelle is liturgical. Amabelle is shagged. Amabelle is tantric. If someone is tantric then they are bifilar. All moroccan people are tantric. Red people are bottomed. White people are moroccan. If Amabelle is moroccan then Amabelle is bifilar. If Dominick is liturgical then Dominick is moroccan. If Kelsey is liturgical and Kelsey is bifilar then Kelsey is tantric. If someone is liturgical then they are shagged. Dominick is not liturgical.", "logic": "\nFollowing(salome)\nLiturgical(salome)\nMoroccan(salome)\nTantric(salome)\nBifilar(salome)\nFollowing(dominick)\nShagged(dominick)\nBottomed(dominick)\nTantric(dominick)\nBifilar(dominick)\nBifilar(kelsey)\nFollowing(amabelle)\nLiturgical(amabelle)\nShagged(amabelle)\nTantric(amabelle)\nforall x (Tantric(x) -> Bifilar(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Tantric(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) -> Bottomed(x))\nforall x (Bifilar(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nMoroccan(amabelle) -> Bifilar(amabelle)\nLiturgical(dominick) -> Moroccan(dominick)\nLiturgical(kelsey) and Bifilar(kelsey) -> Tantric(kelsey)\nforall x (Liturgical(x) -> Shagged(x))\n\nnot Liturgical(dominick)\n\nnot Liturgical(dominick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "Hilda is carnassial. Hilda is tannish. Hilda is bigger. Hilda is unaccepted. Hilda is trigonal. Lissie is carnassial. Lissie is stemless. Lissie is planted. Lissie is unaccepted. Lissie is trigonal. Sigmund is trigonal. Prunella is carnassial. Prunella is tannish. Prunella is stemless. Prunella is unaccepted. If someone is unaccepted then they are trigonal. All bigger people are unaccepted. Red people are planted. White people are bigger. If Prunella is bigger then Prunella is trigonal. If Lissie is tannish then Lissie is bigger. If Sigmund is tannish and Sigmund is trigonal then Sigmund is unaccepted. If someone is tannish then they are stemless. Sigmund is carnassial.", "logic": "\nCarnassial(hilda)\nTannish(hilda)\nBigger(hilda)\nUnaccepted(hilda)\nTrigonal(hilda)\nCarnassial(lissie)\nStemless(lissie)\nPlanted(lissie)\nUnaccepted(lissie)\nTrigonal(lissie)\nTrigonal(sigmund)\nCarnassial(prunella)\nTannish(prunella)\nStemless(prunella)\nUnaccepted(prunella)\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) -> Trigonal(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Unaccepted(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Planted(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> Bigger(x))\nBigger(prunella) -> Trigonal(prunella)\nTannish(lissie) -> Bigger(lissie)\nTannish(sigmund) and Trigonal(sigmund) -> Unaccepted(sigmund)\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Stemless(x))\n\nCarnassial(sigmund)\n\nCarnassial(sigmund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-545"} {"premises": "The marv embark the zebedee. The marv is nifty. The zebedee ferret the marv. If someone ferret the marv then they are nifty. If someone sudate the zebedee and they like the marv then they see the marv. If someone embark the marv then they like the zebedee. If the marv is eyelike and the marv ferret the zebedee then the marv sudate the zebedee. If someone is nifty then they chase the marv. If someone sudate the zebedee then the zebedee embark the marv. The marv is nifty.", "logic": "\nEmbark(marv, zebedee)\nNifty(marv)\nFerret(zebedee, marv)\nforall x (Ferret(x, marv) -> Nifty(x))\nforall x (Sudate(x, zebedee) and Sudate(x, marv) -> Ferret(x, marv))\nforall x (Embark(x, marv) -> Sudate(x, zebedee))\nEyelike(marv) and Ferret(marv, zebedee) -> Sudate(marv, zebedee)\nforall x (Nifty(x) -> Embark(x, marv))\nforall x (Sudate(x, zebedee) -> Embark(zebedee, marv))\n\nNifty(marv)\n\ntherefore Nifty(marv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The chris patent the joey. The chris is canned. The joey airbrush the chris. If someone airbrush the chris then they are canned. If someone sorrow the joey and they like the chris then they see the chris. If someone patent the chris then they like the joey. If the chris is unexampled and the chris airbrush the joey then the chris sorrow the joey. If someone is canned then they chase the chris. If someone sorrow the joey then the joey patent the chris. The joey does not see the chris.", "logic": "\nPatent(chris, joey)\nCanned(chris)\nAirbrush(joey, chris)\nforall x (Airbrush(x, chris) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, joey) and Sorrow(x, chris) -> Airbrush(x, chris))\nforall x (Patent(x, chris) -> Sorrow(x, joey))\nUnexampled(chris) and Airbrush(chris, joey) -> Sorrow(chris, joey)\nforall x (Canned(x) -> Patent(x, chris))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, joey) -> Patent(joey, chris))\n\nnot Airbrush(joey, chris)\n\ntherefore Airbrush(joey, chris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The noell join the aridatha. The noell is catenulate. The aridatha defog the noell. If someone defog the noell then they are catenulate. If someone craunch the aridatha and they like the noell then they see the noell. If someone join the noell then they like the aridatha. If the noell is aboral and the noell defog the aridatha then the noell craunch the aridatha. If someone is catenulate then they chase the noell. If someone craunch the aridatha then the aridatha join the noell. The aridatha is catenulate.", "logic": "\nJoin(noell, aridatha)\nCatenulate(noell)\nDefog(aridatha, noell)\nforall x (Defog(x, noell) -> Catenulate(x))\nforall x (Craunch(x, aridatha) and Craunch(x, noell) -> Defog(x, noell))\nforall x (Join(x, noell) -> Craunch(x, aridatha))\nAboral(noell) and Defog(noell, aridatha) -> Craunch(noell, aridatha)\nforall x (Catenulate(x) -> Join(x, noell))\nforall x (Craunch(x, aridatha) -> Join(aridatha, noell))\n\nCatenulate(aridatha)\n\nDefog(aridatha, noell) and forall x (Defog(x, noell) -> Catenulate(x)) -> therefore Catenulate(aridatha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The cynthy cause the gabe. The cynthy is southmost. The gabe delocalize the cynthy. If someone delocalize the cynthy then they are southmost. If someone glut the gabe and they like the cynthy then they see the cynthy. If someone cause the cynthy then they like the gabe. If the cynthy is plain and the cynthy delocalize the gabe then the cynthy glut the gabe. If someone is southmost then they chase the cynthy. If someone glut the gabe then the gabe cause the cynthy. The gabe is not southmost.", "logic": "\nCause(cynthy, gabe)\nSouthmost(cynthy)\nDelocalize(gabe, cynthy)\nforall x (Delocalize(x, cynthy) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Glut(x, gabe) and Glut(x, cynthy) -> Delocalize(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Cause(x, cynthy) -> Glut(x, gabe))\nPlain(cynthy) and Delocalize(cynthy, gabe) -> Glut(cynthy, gabe)\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> Cause(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Glut(x, gabe) -> Cause(gabe, cynthy))\n\nnot Southmost(gabe)\n\nDelocalize(gabe, cynthy) and forall x (Delocalize(x, cynthy) -> Southmost(x)) -> therefore Southmost(gabe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The ruby outvie the pauli. The ruby is plundering. The pauli stake the ruby. If someone stake the ruby then they are plundering. If someone skunk the pauli and they like the ruby then they see the ruby. If someone outvie the ruby then they like the pauli. If the ruby is roomy and the ruby stake the pauli then the ruby skunk the pauli. If someone is plundering then they chase the ruby. If someone skunk the pauli then the pauli outvie the ruby. The ruby skunk the pauli.", "logic": "\nOutvie(ruby, pauli)\nPlundering(ruby)\nStake(pauli, ruby)\nforall x (Stake(x, ruby) -> Plundering(x))\nforall x (Skunk(x, pauli) and Skunk(x, ruby) -> Stake(x, ruby))\nforall x (Outvie(x, ruby) -> Skunk(x, pauli))\nRoomy(ruby) and Stake(ruby, pauli) -> Skunk(ruby, pauli)\nforall x (Plundering(x) -> Outvie(x, ruby))\nforall x (Skunk(x, pauli) -> Outvie(pauli, ruby))\n\nSkunk(ruby, pauli)\n\nPlundering(ruby) and forall x (Plundering(x) -> Outvie(x, ruby)) -> therefore Outvie(ruby, ruby) Outvie(ruby, ruby) and forall x (Outvie(x, ruby) -> Skunk(x, pauli)) -> therefore Skunk(ruby, pauli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The aggy rely the evangelin. The aggy is untrained. The evangelin toboggan the aggy. If someone toboggan the aggy then they are untrained. If someone palliate the evangelin and they like the aggy then they see the aggy. If someone rely the aggy then they like the evangelin. If the aggy is corrupt and the aggy toboggan the evangelin then the aggy palliate the evangelin. If someone is untrained then they chase the aggy. If someone palliate the evangelin then the evangelin rely the aggy. The aggy does not like the evangelin.", "logic": "\nRely(aggy, evangelin)\nUntrained(aggy)\nToboggan(evangelin, aggy)\nforall x (Toboggan(x, aggy) -> Untrained(x))\nforall x (Palliate(x, evangelin) and Palliate(x, aggy) -> Toboggan(x, aggy))\nforall x (Rely(x, aggy) -> Palliate(x, evangelin))\nCorrupt(aggy) and Toboggan(aggy, evangelin) -> Palliate(aggy, evangelin)\nforall x (Untrained(x) -> Rely(x, aggy))\nforall x (Palliate(x, evangelin) -> Rely(evangelin, aggy))\n\nnot Palliate(aggy, evangelin)\n\nUntrained(aggy) and forall x (Untrained(x) -> Rely(x, aggy)) -> therefore Rely(aggy, aggy) Rely(aggy, aggy) and forall x (Rely(x, aggy) -> Palliate(x, evangelin)) -> therefore Palliate(aggy, evangelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The ellen slump the gigi. The ellen is consolable. The gigi dismember the ellen. If someone dismember the ellen then they are consolable. If someone gasify the gigi and they like the ellen then they see the ellen. If someone slump the ellen then they like the gigi. If the ellen is sinusoidal and the ellen dismember the gigi then the ellen gasify the gigi. If someone is consolable then they chase the ellen. If someone gasify the gigi then the gigi slump the ellen. The gigi gasify the gigi.", "logic": "\nSlump(ellen, gigi)\nConsolable(ellen)\nDismember(gigi, ellen)\nforall x (Dismember(x, ellen) -> Consolable(x))\nforall x (Gasify(x, gigi) and Gasify(x, ellen) -> Dismember(x, ellen))\nforall x (Slump(x, ellen) -> Gasify(x, gigi))\nSinusoidal(ellen) and Dismember(ellen, gigi) -> Gasify(ellen, gigi)\nforall x (Consolable(x) -> Slump(x, ellen))\nforall x (Gasify(x, gigi) -> Slump(gigi, ellen))\n\nGasify(gigi, gigi)\n\nDismember(gigi, ellen) and forall x (Dismember(x, ellen) -> Consolable(x)) -> therefore Consolable(gigi) Consolable(gigi) and forall x (Consolable(x) -> Slump(x, ellen)) -> therefore Slump(gigi, ellen) Slump(gigi, ellen) and forall x (Slump(x, ellen) -> Gasify(x, gigi)) -> therefore Gasify(gigi, gigi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The noami chitter the pierrette. The noami is rejective. The pierrette ware the noami. If someone ware the noami then they are rejective. If someone chauffeur the pierrette and they like the noami then they see the noami. If someone chitter the noami then they like the pierrette. If the noami is copular and the noami ware the pierrette then the noami chauffeur the pierrette. If someone is rejective then they chase the noami. If someone chauffeur the pierrette then the pierrette chitter the noami. The pierrette does not like the pierrette.", "logic": "\nChitter(noami, pierrette)\nRejective(noami)\nWare(pierrette, noami)\nforall x (Ware(x, noami) -> Rejective(x))\nforall x (Chauffeur(x, pierrette) and Chauffeur(x, noami) -> Ware(x, noami))\nforall x (Chitter(x, noami) -> Chauffeur(x, pierrette))\nCopular(noami) and Ware(noami, pierrette) -> Chauffeur(noami, pierrette)\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Chitter(x, noami))\nforall x (Chauffeur(x, pierrette) -> Chitter(pierrette, noami))\n\nnot Chauffeur(pierrette, pierrette)\n\nWare(pierrette, noami) and forall x (Ware(x, noami) -> Rejective(x)) -> therefore Rejective(pierrette) Rejective(pierrette) and forall x (Rejective(x) -> Chitter(x, noami)) -> therefore Chitter(pierrette, noami) Chitter(pierrette, noami) and forall x (Chitter(x, noami) -> Chauffeur(x, pierrette)) -> therefore Chauffeur(pierrette, pierrette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The ned object the clarey. The ned is hearable. The clarey introspect the ned. If someone introspect the ned then they are hearable. If someone ameliorate the clarey and they like the ned then they see the ned. If someone object the ned then they like the clarey. If the ned is immoral and the ned introspect the clarey then the ned ameliorate the clarey. If someone is hearable then they chase the ned. If someone ameliorate the clarey then the clarey object the ned. The ned does not see the ned.", "logic": "\nObject(ned, clarey)\nHearable(ned)\nIntrospect(clarey, ned)\nforall x (Introspect(x, ned) -> Hearable(x))\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, clarey) and Ameliorate(x, ned) -> Introspect(x, ned))\nforall x (Object(x, ned) -> Ameliorate(x, clarey))\nImmoral(ned) and Introspect(ned, clarey) -> Ameliorate(ned, clarey)\nforall x (Hearable(x) -> Object(x, ned))\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, clarey) -> Object(clarey, ned))\n\nnot Introspect(ned, ned)\n\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, clarey) and Ameliorate(x, ned) -> Introspect(x, ned)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The kalle subserve the christa. The kalle is vertical. The christa blacklist the kalle. If someone blacklist the kalle then they are vertical. If someone nickel the christa and they like the kalle then they see the kalle. If someone subserve the kalle then they like the christa. If the kalle is synoecious and the kalle blacklist the christa then the kalle nickel the christa. If someone is vertical then they chase the kalle. If someone nickel the christa then the christa subserve the kalle. The christa is synoecious.", "logic": "\nSubserve(kalle, christa)\nVertical(kalle)\nBlacklist(christa, kalle)\nforall x (Blacklist(x, kalle) -> Vertical(x))\nforall x (Nickel(x, christa) and Nickel(x, kalle) -> Blacklist(x, kalle))\nforall x (Subserve(x, kalle) -> Nickel(x, christa))\nSynoecious(kalle) and Blacklist(kalle, christa) -> Nickel(kalle, christa)\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Subserve(x, kalle))\nforall x (Nickel(x, christa) -> Subserve(christa, kalle))\n\nSynoecious(christa)\n\nSynoecious(christa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The herschel stratify the merna. The herschel is skewed. The merna fetter the herschel. If someone fetter the herschel then they are skewed. If someone dillydally the merna and they like the herschel then they see the herschel. If someone stratify the herschel then they like the merna. If the herschel is cresson and the herschel fetter the merna then the herschel dillydally the merna. If someone is skewed then they chase the herschel. If someone dillydally the merna then the merna stratify the herschel. The merna is not round.", "logic": "\nStratify(herschel, merna)\nSkewed(herschel)\nFetter(merna, herschel)\nforall x (Fetter(x, herschel) -> Skewed(x))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, merna) and Dillydally(x, herschel) -> Fetter(x, herschel))\nforall x (Stratify(x, herschel) -> Dillydally(x, merna))\nCresson(herschel) and Fetter(herschel, merna) -> Dillydally(herschel, merna)\nforall x (Skewed(x) -> Stratify(x, herschel))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, merna) -> Stratify(merna, herschel))\n\nnot Round(merna)\n\nnot Round(merna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The laure electrify the kellyann. The laure is awesome. The kellyann gleam the laure. If someone gleam the laure then they are awesome. If someone sympathise the kellyann and they like the laure then they see the laure. If someone electrify the laure then they like the kellyann. If the laure is elysian and the laure gleam the kellyann then the laure sympathise the kellyann. If someone is awesome then they chase the laure. If someone sympathise the kellyann then the kellyann electrify the laure. The laure is round.", "logic": "\nElectrify(laure, kellyann)\nAwesome(laure)\nGleam(kellyann, laure)\nforall x (Gleam(x, laure) -> Awesome(x))\nforall x (Sympathise(x, kellyann) and Sympathise(x, laure) -> Gleam(x, laure))\nforall x (Electrify(x, laure) -> Sympathise(x, kellyann))\nElysian(laure) and Gleam(laure, kellyann) -> Sympathise(laure, kellyann)\nforall x (Awesome(x) -> Electrify(x, laure))\nforall x (Sympathise(x, kellyann) -> Electrify(kellyann, laure))\n\nRound(laure)\n\nRound(laure) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The elladine solder the mariellen. The elladine is burning. The mariellen rejig the elladine. If someone rejig the elladine then they are burning. If someone cocoon the mariellen and they like the elladine then they see the elladine. If someone solder the elladine then they like the mariellen. If the elladine is adducent and the elladine rejig the mariellen then the elladine cocoon the mariellen. If someone is burning then they chase the elladine. If someone cocoon the mariellen then the mariellen solder the elladine. The mariellen is not red.", "logic": "\nSolder(elladine, mariellen)\nBurning(elladine)\nRejig(mariellen, elladine)\nforall x (Rejig(x, elladine) -> Burning(x))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, mariellen) and Cocoon(x, elladine) -> Rejig(x, elladine))\nforall x (Solder(x, elladine) -> Cocoon(x, mariellen))\nAdducent(elladine) and Rejig(elladine, mariellen) -> Cocoon(elladine, mariellen)\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Solder(x, elladine))\nforall x (Cocoon(x, mariellen) -> Solder(mariellen, elladine))\n\nnot Red(mariellen)\n\nnot Red(mariellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The wenda refract the dimitrou. The wenda is astral. The dimitrou shear the wenda. If someone shear the wenda then they are astral. If someone overtake the dimitrou and they like the wenda then they see the wenda. If someone refract the wenda then they like the dimitrou. If the wenda is manichaean and the wenda shear the dimitrou then the wenda overtake the dimitrou. If someone is astral then they chase the wenda. If someone overtake the dimitrou then the dimitrou refract the wenda. The wenda is nice.", "logic": "\nRefract(wenda, dimitrou)\nAstral(wenda)\nShear(dimitrou, wenda)\nforall x (Shear(x, wenda) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Overtake(x, dimitrou) and Overtake(x, wenda) -> Shear(x, wenda))\nforall x (Refract(x, wenda) -> Overtake(x, dimitrou))\nManichaean(wenda) and Shear(wenda, dimitrou) -> Overtake(wenda, dimitrou)\nforall x (Astral(x) -> Refract(x, wenda))\nforall x (Overtake(x, dimitrou) -> Refract(dimitrou, wenda))\n\nNice(wenda)\n\nNice(wenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The derby corrode the margalo. The derby is joint. The margalo thunder the derby. If someone thunder the derby then they are joint. If someone unsheathe the margalo and they like the derby then they see the derby. If someone corrode the derby then they like the margalo. If the derby is dissenting and the derby thunder the margalo then the derby unsheathe the margalo. If someone is joint then they chase the derby. If someone unsheathe the margalo then the margalo corrode the derby. The margalo does not like the derby.", "logic": "\nCorrode(derby, margalo)\nJoint(derby)\nThunder(margalo, derby)\nforall x (Thunder(x, derby) -> Joint(x))\nforall x (Unsheathe(x, margalo) and Unsheathe(x, derby) -> Thunder(x, derby))\nforall x (Corrode(x, derby) -> Unsheathe(x, margalo))\nDissenting(derby) and Thunder(derby, margalo) -> Unsheathe(derby, margalo)\nforall x (Joint(x) -> Corrode(x, derby))\nforall x (Unsheathe(x, margalo) -> Corrode(margalo, derby))\n\nnot Unsheathe(margalo, derby)\n\nnot Unsheathe(margalo, derby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "The kati victimize the melinde. The kati is crustacean. The melinde beseech the kati. If someone beseech the kati then they are crustacean. If someone spool the melinde and they like the kati then they see the kati. If someone victimize the kati then they like the melinde. If the kati is fortemente and the kati beseech the melinde then the kati spool the melinde. If someone is crustacean then they chase the kati. If someone spool the melinde then the melinde victimize the kati. The kati beseech the melinde.", "logic": "\nVictimize(kati, melinde)\nCrustacean(kati)\nBeseech(melinde, kati)\nforall x (Beseech(x, kati) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Spool(x, melinde) and Spool(x, kati) -> Beseech(x, kati))\nforall x (Victimize(x, kati) -> Spool(x, melinde))\nFortemente(kati) and Beseech(kati, melinde) -> Spool(kati, melinde)\nforall x (Crustacean(x) -> Victimize(x, kati))\nforall x (Spool(x, melinde) -> Victimize(melinde, kati))\n\nBeseech(kati, melinde)\n\nBeseech(kati, melinde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-463"} {"premises": "Carsten is peruvian. Carsten is ampullar. Carsten is overproud. Carsten is velvet. Carsten is perverse. Carsten is multiple. Barbabas is overproud. Barbabas is multiple. Camila is peruvian. Camila is velvet. Camila is precursory. Camila is perverse. All multiple people are perverse. If Camila is velvet and Camila is ampullar then Camila is peruvian. If Camila is precursory and Camila is multiple then Camila is peruvian. If someone is peruvian then they are multiple. If someone is precursory then they are perverse. All multiple people are overproud. All precursory people are peruvian. If someone is perverse then they are multiple. Camila is perverse.", "logic": "\nPeruvian(carsten)\nAmpullar(carsten)\nOverproud(carsten)\nVelvet(carsten)\nPerverse(carsten)\nMultiple(carsten)\nOverproud(barbabas)\nMultiple(barbabas)\nPeruvian(camila)\nVelvet(camila)\nPrecursory(camila)\nPerverse(camila)\nforall x (Multiple(x) -> Perverse(x))\nVelvet(camila) and Ampullar(camila) -> Peruvian(camila)\nPrecursory(camila) and Multiple(camila) -> Peruvian(camila)\nforall x (Peruvian(x) -> Multiple(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) -> Perverse(x))\nforall x (Multiple(x) -> Overproud(x))\nforall x (Precursory(x) -> Peruvian(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Multiple(x))\n\nPerverse(camila)\n\ntherefore Perverse(camila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6945"} {"premises": "Tiebout is osmotic. Tiebout is frangible. Tiebout is monovular. Tiebout is oleaginous. Tiebout is tined. Tiebout is bimetallic. Nestor is monovular. Nestor is bimetallic. Martie is osmotic. Martie is oleaginous. Martie is etiolate. Martie is tined. All bimetallic people are tined. If Martie is oleaginous and Martie is frangible then Martie is osmotic. If Martie is etiolate and Martie is bimetallic then Martie is osmotic. If someone is osmotic then they are bimetallic. If someone is etiolate then they are tined. All bimetallic people are monovular. All etiolate people are osmotic. If someone is tined then they are bimetallic. Tiebout is not tined.", "logic": "\nOsmotic(tiebout)\nFrangible(tiebout)\nMonovular(tiebout)\nOleaginous(tiebout)\nTined(tiebout)\nBimetallic(tiebout)\nMonovular(nestor)\nBimetallic(nestor)\nOsmotic(martie)\nOleaginous(martie)\nEtiolate(martie)\nTined(martie)\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) -> Tined(x))\nOleaginous(martie) and Frangible(martie) -> Osmotic(martie)\nEtiolate(martie) and Bimetallic(martie) -> Osmotic(martie)\nforall x (Osmotic(x) -> Bimetallic(x))\nforall x (Etiolate(x) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Etiolate(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Tined(x) -> Bimetallic(x))\n\nnot Tined(tiebout)\n\ntherefore Tined(tiebout)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6945"} {"premises": "Angel is popliteal. Angel is awake. Angel is afeared. Angel is buccal. Angel is unrepaired. Angel is ahorse. Shimon is afeared. Shimon is ahorse. Eunice is popliteal. Eunice is buccal. Eunice is sweptback. Eunice is unrepaired. All ahorse people are unrepaired. If Eunice is buccal and Eunice is awake then Eunice is popliteal. If Eunice is sweptback and Eunice is ahorse then Eunice is popliteal. If someone is popliteal then they are ahorse. If someone is sweptback then they are unrepaired. All ahorse people are afeared. All sweptback people are popliteal. If someone is unrepaired then they are ahorse. Shimon is not popliteal.", "logic": "\nPopliteal(angel)\nAwake(angel)\nAfeared(angel)\nBuccal(angel)\nUnrepaired(angel)\nAhorse(angel)\nAfeared(shimon)\nAhorse(shimon)\nPopliteal(eunice)\nBuccal(eunice)\nSweptback(eunice)\nUnrepaired(eunice)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nBuccal(eunice) and Awake(eunice) -> Popliteal(eunice)\nSweptback(eunice) and Ahorse(eunice) -> Popliteal(eunice)\nforall x (Popliteal(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) -> Unrepaired(x))\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Afeared(x))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) -> Popliteal(x))\nforall x (Unrepaired(x) -> Ahorse(x))\n\nnot Popliteal(shimon)\n\nforall x (Sweptback(x) -> Popliteal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6945"} {"premises": "Blinny is oceangoing. Blinny is leisurely. Blinny is vagabond. Blinny is agamic. Blinny is organised. Blinny is naturistic. Guthrey is vagabond. Guthrey is naturistic. Bettina is oceangoing. Bettina is agamic. Bettina is unspoilt. Bettina is organised. All naturistic people are organised. If Bettina is agamic and Bettina is leisurely then Bettina is oceangoing. If Bettina is unspoilt and Bettina is naturistic then Bettina is oceangoing. If someone is oceangoing then they are naturistic. If someone is unspoilt then they are organised. All naturistic people are vagabond. All unspoilt people are oceangoing. If someone is organised then they are naturistic. Blinny is unspoilt.", "logic": "\nOceangoing(blinny)\nLeisurely(blinny)\nVagabond(blinny)\nAgamic(blinny)\nOrganised(blinny)\nNaturistic(blinny)\nVagabond(guthrey)\nNaturistic(guthrey)\nOceangoing(bettina)\nAgamic(bettina)\nUnspoilt(bettina)\nOrganised(bettina)\nforall x (Naturistic(x) -> Organised(x))\nAgamic(bettina) and Leisurely(bettina) -> Oceangoing(bettina)\nUnspoilt(bettina) and Naturistic(bettina) -> Oceangoing(bettina)\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) -> Organised(x))\nforall x (Naturistic(x) -> Vagabond(x))\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) -> Naturistic(x))\n\nUnspoilt(blinny)\n\nUnspoilt(blinny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6945"} {"premises": "The joseph opalise the brenna. The brenna debauch the gene. The gene is amenable. Red people are uncleanly. The gene is amenable.", "logic": "\nOpalise(joseph, brenna)\nDebauch(brenna, gene)\nAmenable(gene)\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\n\nAmenable(gene)\n\ntherefore Amenable(gene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "The dasi mark the elora. The elora lark the charmian. The charmian is indignant. Red people are boring. The charmian is not indignant.", "logic": "\nMark(dasi, elora)\nLark(elora, charmian)\nIndignant(charmian)\nforall x (Indignant(x) -> Boring(x))\n\nnot Indignant(charmian)\n\ntherefore Indignant(charmian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "The gabi spelunk the hamel. The hamel view the bee. The bee is advisory. Red people are clitoric. The bee is clitoric.", "logic": "\nSpelunk(gabi, hamel)\nView(hamel, bee)\nAdvisory(bee)\nforall x (Advisory(x) -> Clitoric(x))\n\nClitoric(bee)\n\nAdvisory(bee) and forall x (Advisory(x) -> Clitoric(x)) -> therefore Clitoric(bee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "The gen theorise the rivalee. The rivalee stooge the cleland. The cleland is colonised. Red people are multiplex. The cleland is not multiplex.", "logic": "\nTheorise(gen, rivalee)\nStooge(rivalee, cleland)\nColonised(cleland)\nforall x (Colonised(x) -> Multiplex(x))\n\nnot Multiplex(cleland)\n\nColonised(cleland) and forall x (Colonised(x) -> Multiplex(x)) -> therefore Multiplex(cleland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "The roz arrange the zackariah. The zackariah cathect the nerty. The nerty is alterable. Red people are diaphyseal. The roz is not diaphyseal.", "logic": "\nArrange(roz, zackariah)\nCathect(zackariah, nerty)\nAlterable(nerty)\nforall x (Alterable(x) -> Diaphyseal(x))\n\nnot Diaphyseal(roz)\n\nforall x (Alterable(x) -> Diaphyseal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "The gisella shark the jonny. The jonny bream the biddy. The biddy is medial. Red people are intense. The jonny is intense.", "logic": "\nShark(gisella, jonny)\nBream(jonny, biddy)\nMedial(biddy)\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Intense(x))\n\nIntense(jonny)\n\nforall x (Medial(x) -> Intense(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "The agustin string the modestine. The modestine misprint the robina. The robina is charmed. Red people are tittering. The robina is not round.", "logic": "\nString(agustin, modestine)\nMisprint(modestine, robina)\nCharmed(robina)\nforall x (Charmed(x) -> Tittering(x))\n\nnot Round(robina)\n\nnot Round(robina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "The auria plaster the terrill. The terrill ravish the leia. The leia is blooming. Red people are oldline. The terrill chases the leia.", "logic": "\nPlaster(auria, terrill)\nRavish(terrill, leia)\nBlooming(leia)\nforall x (Blooming(x) -> Oldline(x))\n\nChases(terrill, leia)\n\nChases(terrill, leia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2216"} {"premises": "Leon is regimental. Leon is chalybeate. Leon is confused. Ermina is tsaristic. Ermina is regimental. Ermina is sweetheart. Ermina is chalybeate. Ermina is confused. Ermina is calando. Ermina is sensitised. If Leon is chalybeate and Leon is sweetheart then Leon is sensitised. If someone is sweetheart then they are chalybeate. Smart people are sweetheart. If someone is confused then they are calando. All sensitised, tsaristic people are confused. If Ermina is confused then Ermina is calando. Ermina is confused.", "logic": "\nRegimental(leon)\nChalybeate(leon)\nConfused(leon)\nTsaristic(ermina)\nRegimental(ermina)\nSweetheart(ermina)\nChalybeate(ermina)\nConfused(ermina)\nCalando(ermina)\nSensitised(ermina)\nChalybeate(leon) and Sweetheart(leon) -> Sensitised(leon)\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nforall x (Confused(x) -> Calando(x))\nforall x (Sensitised(x) and Tsaristic(x) -> Confused(x))\nConfused(ermina) -> Calando(ermina)\n\nConfused(ermina)\n\ntherefore Confused(ermina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Oreste is edentate. Oreste is unshaded. Oreste is topped. Wayland is yucky. Wayland is edentate. Wayland is pentatonic. Wayland is unshaded. Wayland is topped. Wayland is unrequited. Wayland is russian. If Oreste is unshaded and Oreste is pentatonic then Oreste is russian. If someone is pentatonic then they are unshaded. Smart people are pentatonic. If someone is topped then they are unrequited. All russian, yucky people are topped. If Wayland is topped then Wayland is unrequited. Oreste is not unshaded.", "logic": "\nEdentate(oreste)\nUnshaded(oreste)\nTopped(oreste)\nYucky(wayland)\nEdentate(wayland)\nPentatonic(wayland)\nUnshaded(wayland)\nTopped(wayland)\nUnrequited(wayland)\nRussian(wayland)\nUnshaded(oreste) and Pentatonic(oreste) -> Russian(oreste)\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Unshaded(x))\nforall x (Unrequited(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Topped(x) -> Unrequited(x))\nforall x (Russian(x) and Yucky(x) -> Topped(x))\nTopped(wayland) -> Unrequited(wayland)\n\nnot Unshaded(oreste)\n\ntherefore Unshaded(oreste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Flin is diaphyseal. Flin is sebaceous. Flin is tumultuous. Velvet is raiding. Velvet is diaphyseal. Velvet is calycine. Velvet is sebaceous. Velvet is tumultuous. Velvet is uneducated. Velvet is cadastral. If Flin is sebaceous and Flin is calycine then Flin is cadastral. If someone is calycine then they are sebaceous. Smart people are calycine. If someone is tumultuous then they are uneducated. All cadastral, raiding people are tumultuous. If Velvet is tumultuous then Velvet is uneducated. Flin is uneducated.", "logic": "\nDiaphyseal(flin)\nSebaceous(flin)\nTumultuous(flin)\nRaiding(velvet)\nDiaphyseal(velvet)\nCalycine(velvet)\nSebaceous(velvet)\nTumultuous(velvet)\nUneducated(velvet)\nCadastral(velvet)\nSebaceous(flin) and Calycine(flin) -> Cadastral(flin)\nforall x (Calycine(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Cadastral(x) and Raiding(x) -> Tumultuous(x))\nTumultuous(velvet) -> Uneducated(velvet)\n\nUneducated(flin)\n\nTumultuous(flin) and forall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Uneducated(x)) -> therefore Uneducated(flin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Maryanne is vestibular. Maryanne is diarrhoeal. Maryanne is blear. Sergio is missionary. Sergio is vestibular. Sergio is ceremonial. Sergio is diarrhoeal. Sergio is blear. Sergio is unlocked. Sergio is everyday. If Maryanne is diarrhoeal and Maryanne is ceremonial then Maryanne is everyday. If someone is ceremonial then they are diarrhoeal. Smart people are ceremonial. If someone is blear then they are unlocked. All everyday, missionary people are blear. If Sergio is blear then Sergio is unlocked. Maryanne is not unlocked.", "logic": "\nVestibular(maryanne)\nDiarrhoeal(maryanne)\nBlear(maryanne)\nMissionary(sergio)\nVestibular(sergio)\nCeremonial(sergio)\nDiarrhoeal(sergio)\nBlear(sergio)\nUnlocked(sergio)\nEveryday(sergio)\nDiarrhoeal(maryanne) and Ceremonial(maryanne) -> Everyday(maryanne)\nforall x (Ceremonial(x) -> Diarrhoeal(x))\nforall x (Unlocked(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Blear(x) -> Unlocked(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) and Missionary(x) -> Blear(x))\nBlear(sergio) -> Unlocked(sergio)\n\nnot Unlocked(maryanne)\n\nBlear(maryanne) and forall x (Blear(x) -> Unlocked(x)) -> therefore Unlocked(maryanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Edward is impressive. Edward is zaftig. Edward is lucent. Rudiger is overseas. Rudiger is impressive. Rudiger is unfeigned. Rudiger is zaftig. Rudiger is lucent. Rudiger is antipodean. Rudiger is outraged. If Edward is zaftig and Edward is unfeigned then Edward is outraged. If someone is unfeigned then they are zaftig. Smart people are unfeigned. If someone is lucent then they are antipodean. All outraged, overseas people are lucent. If Rudiger is lucent then Rudiger is antipodean. Edward is unfeigned.", "logic": "\nImpressive(edward)\nZaftig(edward)\nLucent(edward)\nOverseas(rudiger)\nImpressive(rudiger)\nUnfeigned(rudiger)\nZaftig(rudiger)\nLucent(rudiger)\nAntipodean(rudiger)\nOutraged(rudiger)\nZaftig(edward) and Unfeigned(edward) -> Outraged(edward)\nforall x (Unfeigned(x) -> Zaftig(x))\nforall x (Antipodean(x) -> Unfeigned(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) -> Antipodean(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) and Overseas(x) -> Lucent(x))\nLucent(rudiger) -> Antipodean(rudiger)\n\nUnfeigned(edward)\n\nLucent(edward) and forall x (Lucent(x) -> Antipodean(x)) -> therefore Antipodean(edward) Antipodean(edward) and forall x (Antipodean(x) -> Unfeigned(x)) -> therefore Unfeigned(edward)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Agatha is avellane. Agatha is bordered. Agatha is spiraling. Ollie is unaired. Ollie is avellane. Ollie is appellant. Ollie is bordered. Ollie is spiraling. Ollie is metric. Ollie is vocalic. If Agatha is bordered and Agatha is appellant then Agatha is vocalic. If someone is appellant then they are bordered. Smart people are appellant. If someone is spiraling then they are metric. All vocalic, unaired people are spiraling. If Ollie is spiraling then Ollie is metric. Agatha is not appellant.", "logic": "\nAvellane(agatha)\nBordered(agatha)\nSpiraling(agatha)\nUnaired(ollie)\nAvellane(ollie)\nAppellant(ollie)\nBordered(ollie)\nSpiraling(ollie)\nMetric(ollie)\nVocalic(ollie)\nBordered(agatha) and Appellant(agatha) -> Vocalic(agatha)\nforall x (Appellant(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Appellant(x))\nforall x (Spiraling(x) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Vocalic(x) and Unaired(x) -> Spiraling(x))\nSpiraling(ollie) -> Metric(ollie)\n\nnot Appellant(agatha)\n\nSpiraling(agatha) and forall x (Spiraling(x) -> Metric(x)) -> therefore Metric(agatha) Metric(agatha) and forall x (Metric(x) -> Appellant(x)) -> therefore Appellant(agatha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Catharine is chipper. Catharine is royal. Catharine is chiseled. Brody is extant. Brody is chipper. Brody is motor. Brody is royal. Brody is chiseled. Brody is saccharine. Brody is convincing. If Catharine is royal and Catharine is motor then Catharine is convincing. If someone is motor then they are royal. Smart people are motor. If someone is chiseled then they are saccharine. All convincing, extant people are chiseled. If Brody is chiseled then Brody is saccharine. Catharine is convincing.", "logic": "\nChipper(catharine)\nRoyal(catharine)\nChiseled(catharine)\nExtant(brody)\nChipper(brody)\nMotor(brody)\nRoyal(brody)\nChiseled(brody)\nSaccharine(brody)\nConvincing(brody)\nRoyal(catharine) and Motor(catharine) -> Convincing(catharine)\nforall x (Motor(x) -> Royal(x))\nforall x (Saccharine(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Chiseled(x) -> Saccharine(x))\nforall x (Convincing(x) and Extant(x) -> Chiseled(x))\nChiseled(brody) -> Saccharine(brody)\n\nConvincing(catharine)\n\nChiseled(catharine) and forall x (Chiseled(x) -> Saccharine(x)) -> therefore Saccharine(catharine) Saccharine(catharine) and forall x (Saccharine(x) -> Motor(x)) -> therefore Motor(catharine) Royal(catharine) and Motor(catharine) and Royal(catharine) and Motor(catharine) -> Convincing(catharine) -> therefore Convincing(catharine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Clarey is strait. Clarey is centered. Clarey is uxorious. Matthaeus is biblical. Matthaeus is strait. Matthaeus is suspect. Matthaeus is centered. Matthaeus is uxorious. Matthaeus is unstaged. Matthaeus is abject. If Clarey is centered and Clarey is suspect then Clarey is abject. If someone is suspect then they are centered. Smart people are suspect. If someone is uxorious then they are unstaged. All abject, biblical people are uxorious. If Matthaeus is uxorious then Matthaeus is unstaged. Clarey is not abject.", "logic": "\nStrait(clarey)\nCentered(clarey)\nUxorious(clarey)\nBiblical(matthaeus)\nStrait(matthaeus)\nSuspect(matthaeus)\nCentered(matthaeus)\nUxorious(matthaeus)\nUnstaged(matthaeus)\nAbject(matthaeus)\nCentered(clarey) and Suspect(clarey) -> Abject(clarey)\nforall x (Suspect(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Unstaged(x) -> Suspect(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) -> Unstaged(x))\nforall x (Abject(x) and Biblical(x) -> Uxorious(x))\nUxorious(matthaeus) -> Unstaged(matthaeus)\n\nnot Abject(clarey)\n\nUxorious(clarey) and forall x (Uxorious(x) -> Unstaged(x)) -> therefore Unstaged(clarey) Unstaged(clarey) and forall x (Unstaged(x) -> Suspect(x)) -> therefore Suspect(clarey) Centered(clarey) and Suspect(clarey) and Centered(clarey) and Suspect(clarey) -> Abject(clarey) -> therefore Abject(clarey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1664"} {"premises": "Ada is schematic. Ada is delusory. Ada is aeriferous. Ada is bovid. Raynard is schematic. Raynard is bovid. Karen is schematic. Karen is bovid. Judye is unsyllabic. Judye is expositive. If someone is aeriferous and expositive then they are not bovid. If someone is unsyllabic then they are not bovid. If someone is schematic then they are aeriferous. All unsyllabic people are schematic. If Judye is aeriferous then Judye is delusory. If someone is unsyllabic and not schematic then they are delusory. Ada is aeriferous.", "logic": "\nSchematic(ada)\nDelusory(ada)\nAeriferous(ada)\nBovid(ada)\nSchematic(raynard)\nBovid(raynard)\nSchematic(karen)\nBovid(karen)\nUnsyllabic(judye)\nExpositive(judye)\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) and Expositive(x) -> not Bovid(x))\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> not Bovid(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> Schematic(x))\nAeriferous(judye) -> Delusory(judye)\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) and not Schematic(x) -> Delusory(x))\n\nAeriferous(ada)\n\ntherefore Aeriferous(ada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Carmelia is clamorous. Carmelia is patterned. Carmelia is broadside. Carmelia is masoretic. Ambrosia is clamorous. Ambrosia is masoretic. Hailee is clamorous. Hailee is masoretic. Steve is unvented. Steve is accumbent. If someone is broadside and accumbent then they are not masoretic. If someone is unvented then they are not masoretic. If someone is clamorous then they are broadside. All unvented people are clamorous. If Steve is broadside then Steve is patterned. If someone is unvented and not clamorous then they are patterned. Hailee is not clamorous.", "logic": "\nClamorous(carmelia)\nPatterned(carmelia)\nBroadside(carmelia)\nMasoretic(carmelia)\nClamorous(ambrosia)\nMasoretic(ambrosia)\nClamorous(hailee)\nMasoretic(hailee)\nUnvented(steve)\nAccumbent(steve)\nforall x (Broadside(x) and Accumbent(x) -> not Masoretic(x))\nforall x (Unvented(x) -> not Masoretic(x))\nforall x (Clamorous(x) -> Broadside(x))\nforall x (Unvented(x) -> Clamorous(x))\nBroadside(steve) -> Patterned(steve)\nforall x (Unvented(x) and not Clamorous(x) -> Patterned(x))\n\nnot Clamorous(hailee)\n\ntherefore Clamorous(hailee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Tandi is offbeat. Tandi is gaumless. Tandi is plumbous. Tandi is buxom. Witold is offbeat. Witold is buxom. Murphy is offbeat. Murphy is buxom. Evita is pleural. Evita is dummy. If someone is plumbous and dummy then they are not buxom. If someone is pleural then they are not buxom. If someone is offbeat then they are plumbous. All pleural people are offbeat. If Evita is plumbous then Evita is gaumless. If someone is pleural and not offbeat then they are gaumless. Evita is not buxom.", "logic": "\nOffbeat(tandi)\nGaumless(tandi)\nPlumbous(tandi)\nBuxom(tandi)\nOffbeat(witold)\nBuxom(witold)\nOffbeat(murphy)\nBuxom(murphy)\nPleural(evita)\nDummy(evita)\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Dummy(x) -> not Buxom(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> not Buxom(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nPlumbous(evita) -> Gaumless(evita)\nforall x (Pleural(x) and not Offbeat(x) -> Gaumless(x))\n\nnot Buxom(evita)\n\nPleural(evita) and forall x (Pleural(x) -> not Buxom(x)) -> therefore not Buxom(evita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Maxy is preemptive. Maxy is bespoken. Maxy is softheaded. Maxy is cussed. Abdullah is preemptive. Abdullah is cussed. Daffy is preemptive. Daffy is cussed. Gabbi is unplanted. Gabbi is debauched. If someone is softheaded and debauched then they are not cussed. If someone is unplanted then they are not cussed. If someone is preemptive then they are softheaded. All unplanted people are preemptive. If Gabbi is softheaded then Gabbi is bespoken. If someone is unplanted and not preemptive then they are bespoken. Abdullah is not softheaded.", "logic": "\nPreemptive(maxy)\nBespoken(maxy)\nSoftheaded(maxy)\nCussed(maxy)\nPreemptive(abdullah)\nCussed(abdullah)\nPreemptive(daffy)\nCussed(daffy)\nUnplanted(gabbi)\nDebauched(gabbi)\nforall x (Softheaded(x) and Debauched(x) -> not Cussed(x))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> not Cussed(x))\nforall x (Preemptive(x) -> Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nSoftheaded(gabbi) -> Bespoken(gabbi)\nforall x (Unplanted(x) and not Preemptive(x) -> Bespoken(x))\n\nnot Softheaded(abdullah)\n\nPreemptive(abdullah) and forall x (Preemptive(x) -> Softheaded(x)) -> therefore Softheaded(abdullah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Murielle is amiss. Murielle is trustful. Murielle is alienated. Murielle is taliped. Henrieta is amiss. Henrieta is taliped. Anatoly is amiss. Anatoly is taliped. Baldwin is zaftig. Baldwin is poetic. If someone is alienated and poetic then they are not taliped. If someone is zaftig then they are not taliped. If someone is amiss then they are alienated. All zaftig people are amiss. If Baldwin is alienated then Baldwin is trustful. If someone is zaftig and not amiss then they are trustful. Baldwin is alienated.", "logic": "\nAmiss(murielle)\nTrustful(murielle)\nAlienated(murielle)\nTaliped(murielle)\nAmiss(henrieta)\nTaliped(henrieta)\nAmiss(anatoly)\nTaliped(anatoly)\nZaftig(baldwin)\nPoetic(baldwin)\nforall x (Alienated(x) and Poetic(x) -> not Taliped(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) -> not Taliped(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) -> Amiss(x))\nAlienated(baldwin) -> Trustful(baldwin)\nforall x (Zaftig(x) and not Amiss(x) -> Trustful(x))\n\nAlienated(baldwin)\n\nZaftig(baldwin) and forall x (Zaftig(x) -> Amiss(x)) -> therefore Amiss(baldwin) Amiss(baldwin) and forall x (Amiss(x) -> Alienated(x)) -> therefore Alienated(baldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Kaye is resinated. Kaye is dashing. Kaye is negligent. Kaye is expressed. Nanny is resinated. Nanny is expressed. Renaldo is resinated. Renaldo is expressed. Meredithe is voidable. Meredithe is commanding. If someone is negligent and commanding then they are not expressed. If someone is voidable then they are not expressed. If someone is resinated then they are negligent. All voidable people are resinated. If Meredithe is negligent then Meredithe is dashing. If someone is voidable and not resinated then they are dashing. Meredithe is not negligent.", "logic": "\nResinated(kaye)\nDashing(kaye)\nNegligent(kaye)\nExpressed(kaye)\nResinated(nanny)\nExpressed(nanny)\nResinated(renaldo)\nExpressed(renaldo)\nVoidable(meredithe)\nCommanding(meredithe)\nforall x (Negligent(x) and Commanding(x) -> not Expressed(x))\nforall x (Voidable(x) -> not Expressed(x))\nforall x (Resinated(x) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Voidable(x) -> Resinated(x))\nNegligent(meredithe) -> Dashing(meredithe)\nforall x (Voidable(x) and not Resinated(x) -> Dashing(x))\n\nnot Negligent(meredithe)\n\nVoidable(meredithe) and forall x (Voidable(x) -> Resinated(x)) -> therefore Resinated(meredithe) Resinated(meredithe) and forall x (Resinated(x) -> Negligent(x)) -> therefore Negligent(meredithe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Clemente is secure. Clemente is moonlit. Clemente is deferent. Clemente is lobar. Lionello is secure. Lionello is lobar. Aleta is secure. Aleta is lobar. Deedee is mural. Deedee is jovian. If someone is deferent and jovian then they are not lobar. If someone is mural then they are not lobar. If someone is secure then they are deferent. All mural people are secure. If Deedee is deferent then Deedee is moonlit. If someone is mural and not secure then they are moonlit. Deedee is moonlit.", "logic": "\nSecure(clemente)\nMoonlit(clemente)\nDeferent(clemente)\nLobar(clemente)\nSecure(lionello)\nLobar(lionello)\nSecure(aleta)\nLobar(aleta)\nMural(deedee)\nJovian(deedee)\nforall x (Deferent(x) and Jovian(x) -> not Lobar(x))\nforall x (Mural(x) -> not Lobar(x))\nforall x (Secure(x) -> Deferent(x))\nforall x (Mural(x) -> Secure(x))\nDeferent(deedee) -> Moonlit(deedee)\nforall x (Mural(x) and not Secure(x) -> Moonlit(x))\n\nMoonlit(deedee)\n\nMural(deedee) and forall x (Mural(x) -> Secure(x)) -> therefore Secure(deedee) Secure(deedee) and forall x (Secure(x) -> Deferent(x)) -> therefore Deferent(deedee) Deferent(deedee) and Deferent(deedee) -> Moonlit(deedee) -> therefore Moonlit(deedee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Willetta is meshed. Willetta is servile. Willetta is adoring. Willetta is judicial. Klara is meshed. Klara is judicial. Sheeree is meshed. Sheeree is judicial. Iggy is vulgar. Iggy is subjacent. If someone is adoring and subjacent then they are not judicial. If someone is vulgar then they are not judicial. If someone is meshed then they are adoring. All vulgar people are meshed. If Iggy is adoring then Iggy is servile. If someone is vulgar and not meshed then they are servile. Iggy is not servile.", "logic": "\nMeshed(willetta)\nServile(willetta)\nAdoring(willetta)\nJudicial(willetta)\nMeshed(klara)\nJudicial(klara)\nMeshed(sheeree)\nJudicial(sheeree)\nVulgar(iggy)\nSubjacent(iggy)\nforall x (Adoring(x) and Subjacent(x) -> not Judicial(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> not Judicial(x))\nforall x (Meshed(x) -> Adoring(x))\nforall x (Vulgar(x) -> Meshed(x))\nAdoring(iggy) -> Servile(iggy)\nforall x (Vulgar(x) and not Meshed(x) -> Servile(x))\n\nnot Servile(iggy)\n\nVulgar(iggy) and forall x (Vulgar(x) -> Meshed(x)) -> therefore Meshed(iggy) Meshed(iggy) and forall x (Meshed(x) -> Adoring(x)) -> therefore Adoring(iggy) Adoring(iggy) and Adoring(iggy) -> Servile(iggy) -> therefore Servile(iggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Mathew is alarming. Mathew is olympic. Mathew is avian. Mathew is thirteenth. Vally is alarming. Vally is thirteenth. Emalia is alarming. Emalia is thirteenth. Milt is ahorseback. Milt is grateful. If someone is avian and grateful then they are not thirteenth. If someone is ahorseback then they are not thirteenth. If someone is alarming then they are avian. All ahorseback people are alarming. If Milt is avian then Milt is olympic. If someone is ahorseback and not alarming then they are olympic. Vally is not olympic.", "logic": "\nAlarming(mathew)\nOlympic(mathew)\nAvian(mathew)\nThirteenth(mathew)\nAlarming(vally)\nThirteenth(vally)\nAlarming(emalia)\nThirteenth(emalia)\nAhorseback(milt)\nGrateful(milt)\nforall x (Avian(x) and Grateful(x) -> not Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> not Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Alarming(x) -> Avian(x))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> Alarming(x))\nAvian(milt) -> Olympic(milt)\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) and not Alarming(x) -> Olympic(x))\n\nnot Olympic(vally)\n\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) and not Alarming(x) -> Olympic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Dulcia is ratty. Dulcia is scarlet. Dulcia is newsy. Dulcia is federated. Bennet is ratty. Bennet is federated. Judith is ratty. Judith is federated. Willmott is steadied. Willmott is sour. If someone is newsy and sour then they are not federated. If someone is steadied then they are not federated. If someone is ratty then they are newsy. All steadied people are ratty. If Willmott is newsy then Willmott is scarlet. If someone is steadied and not ratty then they are scarlet. Judith is scarlet.", "logic": "\nRatty(dulcia)\nScarlet(dulcia)\nNewsy(dulcia)\nFederated(dulcia)\nRatty(bennet)\nFederated(bennet)\nRatty(judith)\nFederated(judith)\nSteadied(willmott)\nSour(willmott)\nforall x (Newsy(x) and Sour(x) -> not Federated(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> not Federated(x))\nforall x (Ratty(x) -> Newsy(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Ratty(x))\nNewsy(willmott) -> Scarlet(willmott)\nforall x (Steadied(x) and not Ratty(x) -> Scarlet(x))\n\nScarlet(judith)\n\nforall x (Steadied(x) and not Ratty(x) -> Scarlet(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Cordelie is degage. Cordelie is dilettante. Cordelie is unable. Cordelie is crusty. Zolly is degage. Zolly is crusty. Stacee is degage. Stacee is crusty. Clayton is crafty. Clayton is remarkable. If someone is unable and remarkable then they are not crusty. If someone is crafty then they are not crusty. If someone is degage then they are unable. All crafty people are degage. If Clayton is unable then Clayton is dilettante. If someone is crafty and not degage then they are dilettante. Zolly is not smart.", "logic": "\nDegage(cordelie)\nDilettante(cordelie)\nUnable(cordelie)\nCrusty(cordelie)\nDegage(zolly)\nCrusty(zolly)\nDegage(stacee)\nCrusty(stacee)\nCrafty(clayton)\nRemarkable(clayton)\nforall x (Unable(x) and Remarkable(x) -> not Crusty(x))\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> not Crusty(x))\nforall x (Degage(x) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> Degage(x))\nUnable(clayton) -> Dilettante(clayton)\nforall x (Crafty(x) and not Degage(x) -> Dilettante(x))\n\nnot Smart(zolly)\n\nnot Smart(zolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Bonny is monaural. Bonny is inanimate. Bonny is polyhedral. Bonny is rupestral. Amalea is monaural. Amalea is rupestral. Ari is monaural. Ari is rupestral. Curtice is haemolytic. Curtice is crusted. If someone is polyhedral and crusted then they are not rupestral. If someone is haemolytic then they are not rupestral. If someone is monaural then they are polyhedral. All haemolytic people are monaural. If Curtice is polyhedral then Curtice is inanimate. If someone is haemolytic and not monaural then they are inanimate. Ari is crusted.", "logic": "\nMonaural(bonny)\nInanimate(bonny)\nPolyhedral(bonny)\nRupestral(bonny)\nMonaural(amalea)\nRupestral(amalea)\nMonaural(ari)\nRupestral(ari)\nHaemolytic(curtice)\nCrusted(curtice)\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) and Crusted(x) -> not Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Haemolytic(x) -> not Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Monaural(x) -> Polyhedral(x))\nforall x (Haemolytic(x) -> Monaural(x))\nPolyhedral(curtice) -> Inanimate(curtice)\nforall x (Haemolytic(x) and not Monaural(x) -> Inanimate(x))\n\nCrusted(ari)\n\nCrusted(ari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Evie is depressing. Evie is adsorbate. Evie is sulphurous. Evie is homebound. Oberon is depressing. Oberon is homebound. Lorena is depressing. Lorena is homebound. Ulrika is unfeeling. Ulrika is calicular. If someone is sulphurous and calicular then they are not homebound. If someone is unfeeling then they are not homebound. If someone is depressing then they are sulphurous. All unfeeling people are depressing. If Ulrika is sulphurous then Ulrika is adsorbate. If someone is unfeeling and not depressing then they are adsorbate. Evie is not unfeeling.", "logic": "\nDepressing(evie)\nAdsorbate(evie)\nSulphurous(evie)\nHomebound(evie)\nDepressing(oberon)\nHomebound(oberon)\nDepressing(lorena)\nHomebound(lorena)\nUnfeeling(ulrika)\nCalicular(ulrika)\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) and Calicular(x) -> not Homebound(x))\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) -> not Homebound(x))\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Sulphurous(x))\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) -> Depressing(x))\nSulphurous(ulrika) -> Adsorbate(ulrika)\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) and not Depressing(x) -> Adsorbate(x))\n\nnot Unfeeling(evie)\n\nnot Unfeeling(evie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Jennee is impalpable. Jennee is nonleaded. Jennee is hebraic. Jennee is repressing. Therine is impalpable. Therine is repressing. Marget is impalpable. Marget is repressing. Eloise is courtly. Eloise is balzacian. If someone is hebraic and balzacian then they are not repressing. If someone is courtly then they are not repressing. If someone is impalpable then they are hebraic. All courtly people are impalpable. If Eloise is hebraic then Eloise is nonleaded. If someone is courtly and not impalpable then they are nonleaded. Marget is smart.", "logic": "\nImpalpable(jennee)\nNonleaded(jennee)\nHebraic(jennee)\nRepressing(jennee)\nImpalpable(therine)\nRepressing(therine)\nImpalpable(marget)\nRepressing(marget)\nCourtly(eloise)\nBalzacian(eloise)\nforall x (Hebraic(x) and Balzacian(x) -> not Repressing(x))\nforall x (Courtly(x) -> not Repressing(x))\nforall x (Impalpable(x) -> Hebraic(x))\nforall x (Courtly(x) -> Impalpable(x))\nHebraic(eloise) -> Nonleaded(eloise)\nforall x (Courtly(x) and not Impalpable(x) -> Nonleaded(x))\n\nSmart(marget)\n\nSmart(marget) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Hermione is unsaid. Hermione is acerb. Hermione is parlous. Hermione is opponent. Raychel is unsaid. Raychel is opponent. Martainn is unsaid. Martainn is opponent. Isabel is unreactive. Isabel is ignited. If someone is parlous and ignited then they are not opponent. If someone is unreactive then they are not opponent. If someone is unsaid then they are parlous. All unreactive people are unsaid. If Isabel is parlous then Isabel is acerb. If someone is unreactive and not unsaid then they are acerb. Hermione is not ignited.", "logic": "\nUnsaid(hermione)\nAcerb(hermione)\nParlous(hermione)\nOpponent(hermione)\nUnsaid(raychel)\nOpponent(raychel)\nUnsaid(martainn)\nOpponent(martainn)\nUnreactive(isabel)\nIgnited(isabel)\nforall x (Parlous(x) and Ignited(x) -> not Opponent(x))\nforall x (Unreactive(x) -> not Opponent(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Parlous(x))\nforall x (Unreactive(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nParlous(isabel) -> Acerb(isabel)\nforall x (Unreactive(x) and not Unsaid(x) -> Acerb(x))\n\nnot Ignited(hermione)\n\nnot Ignited(hermione) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "Berthe is grammatic. Berthe is christly. Berthe is alert. Berthe is unbigoted. Rosamond is grammatic. Rosamond is unbigoted. Renie is grammatic. Renie is unbigoted. Blanch is ascitic. Blanch is colonized. If someone is alert and colonized then they are not unbigoted. If someone is ascitic then they are not unbigoted. If someone is grammatic then they are alert. All ascitic people are grammatic. If Blanch is alert then Blanch is christly. If someone is ascitic and not grammatic then they are christly. Rosamond is ascitic.", "logic": "\nGrammatic(berthe)\nChristly(berthe)\nAlert(berthe)\nUnbigoted(berthe)\nGrammatic(rosamond)\nUnbigoted(rosamond)\nGrammatic(renie)\nUnbigoted(renie)\nAscitic(blanch)\nColonized(blanch)\nforall x (Alert(x) and Colonized(x) -> not Unbigoted(x))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> not Unbigoted(x))\nforall x (Grammatic(x) -> Alert(x))\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> Grammatic(x))\nAlert(blanch) -> Christly(blanch)\nforall x (Ascitic(x) and not Grammatic(x) -> Christly(x))\n\nAscitic(rosamond)\n\nAscitic(rosamond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1620"} {"premises": "The dara fagot the prasun. The leone is extensible. The prasun is extensible. If someone decay the prasun and the prasun is picayune then they see the leone. If someone is picayune then they chase the leone. If someone is covariant and they eat the leone then they see the leone. If someone is leaflike then they chase the prasun. If someone fagot the prasun and they chase the prasun then the prasun fagot the dara. If someone fagot the prasun then they are leaflike. The prasun is extensible.", "logic": "\nFagot(dara, prasun)\nExtensible(leone)\nExtensible(prasun)\nforall x (Decay(x, prasun) and Picayune(prasun) -> Decay(x, leone))\nforall x (Picayune(x) -> Wake(x, leone))\nforall x (Covariant(x) and Fagot(x, leone) -> Decay(x, leone))\nforall x (Leaflike(x) -> Wake(x, prasun))\nforall x (Fagot(x, prasun) and Wake(x, prasun) -> Fagot(prasun, dara))\nforall x (Fagot(x, prasun) -> Leaflike(x))\n\nExtensible(prasun)\n\ntherefore Extensible(prasun)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The amara waken the simone. The neville is spicy. The simone is spicy. If someone crown the simone and the simone is alchemic then they see the neville. If someone is alchemic then they chase the neville. If someone is twisty and they eat the neville then they see the neville. If someone is christlike then they chase the simone. If someone waken the simone and they chase the simone then the simone waken the amara. If someone waken the simone then they are christlike. The neville is not spicy.", "logic": "\nWaken(amara, simone)\nSpicy(neville)\nSpicy(simone)\nforall x (Crown(x, simone) and Alchemic(simone) -> Crown(x, neville))\nforall x (Alchemic(x) -> Schuss(x, neville))\nforall x (Twisty(x) and Waken(x, neville) -> Crown(x, neville))\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> Schuss(x, simone))\nforall x (Waken(x, simone) and Schuss(x, simone) -> Waken(simone, amara))\nforall x (Waken(x, simone) -> Christlike(x))\n\nnot Spicy(neville)\n\ntherefore Spicy(neville)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The orelia disembowel the griff. The mellicent is mucoid. The griff is mucoid. If someone excruciate the griff and the griff is huxleyan then they see the mellicent. If someone is huxleyan then they chase the mellicent. If someone is graded and they eat the mellicent then they see the mellicent. If someone is blubbery then they chase the griff. If someone disembowel the griff and they chase the griff then the griff disembowel the orelia. If someone disembowel the griff then they are blubbery. The orelia is blubbery.", "logic": "\nDisembowel(orelia, griff)\nMucoid(mellicent)\nMucoid(griff)\nforall x (Excruciate(x, griff) and Huxleyan(griff) -> Excruciate(x, mellicent))\nforall x (Huxleyan(x) -> Surround(x, mellicent))\nforall x (Graded(x) and Disembowel(x, mellicent) -> Excruciate(x, mellicent))\nforall x (Blubbery(x) -> Surround(x, griff))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, griff) and Surround(x, griff) -> Disembowel(griff, orelia))\nforall x (Disembowel(x, griff) -> Blubbery(x))\n\nBlubbery(orelia)\n\nDisembowel(orelia, griff) and forall x (Disembowel(x, griff) -> Blubbery(x)) -> therefore Blubbery(orelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The geof influence the skipper. The socrates is antennal. The skipper is antennal. If someone intensify the skipper and the skipper is nutbrown then they see the socrates. If someone is nutbrown then they chase the socrates. If someone is vagabond and they eat the socrates then they see the socrates. If someone is biaxal then they chase the skipper. If someone influence the skipper and they chase the skipper then the skipper influence the geof. If someone influence the skipper then they are biaxal. The geof is not biaxal.", "logic": "\nInfluence(geof, skipper)\nAntennal(socrates)\nAntennal(skipper)\nforall x (Intensify(x, skipper) and Nutbrown(skipper) -> Intensify(x, socrates))\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) -> Slump(x, socrates))\nforall x (Vagabond(x) and Influence(x, socrates) -> Intensify(x, socrates))\nforall x (Biaxal(x) -> Slump(x, skipper))\nforall x (Influence(x, skipper) and Slump(x, skipper) -> Influence(skipper, geof))\nforall x (Influence(x, skipper) -> Biaxal(x))\n\nnot Biaxal(geof)\n\nInfluence(geof, skipper) and forall x (Influence(x, skipper) -> Biaxal(x)) -> therefore Biaxal(geof)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The felicity condition the nevil. The fiorenze is firstborn. The nevil is firstborn. If someone beep the nevil and the nevil is ungenerous then they see the fiorenze. If someone is ungenerous then they chase the fiorenze. If someone is muciferous and they eat the fiorenze then they see the fiorenze. If someone is anglican then they chase the nevil. If someone condition the nevil and they chase the nevil then the nevil condition the felicity. If someone condition the nevil then they are anglican. The felicity cashier the nevil.", "logic": "\nCondition(felicity, nevil)\nFirstborn(fiorenze)\nFirstborn(nevil)\nforall x (Beep(x, nevil) and Ungenerous(nevil) -> Beep(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Ungenerous(x) -> Cashier(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Muciferous(x) and Condition(x, fiorenze) -> Beep(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Anglican(x) -> Cashier(x, nevil))\nforall x (Condition(x, nevil) and Cashier(x, nevil) -> Condition(nevil, felicity))\nforall x (Condition(x, nevil) -> Anglican(x))\n\nCashier(felicity, nevil)\n\nCondition(felicity, nevil) and forall x (Condition(x, nevil) -> Anglican(x)) -> therefore Anglican(felicity) Anglican(felicity) and forall x (Anglican(x) -> Cashier(x, nevil)) -> therefore Cashier(felicity, nevil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The bishop buff the guendolen. The vitoria is sensitized. The guendolen is sensitized. If someone profiteer the guendolen and the guendolen is deathlike then they see the vitoria. If someone is deathlike then they chase the vitoria. If someone is jawed and they eat the vitoria then they see the vitoria. If someone is chinless then they chase the guendolen. If someone buff the guendolen and they chase the guendolen then the guendolen buff the bishop. If someone buff the guendolen then they are chinless. The bishop does not chase the guendolen.", "logic": "\nBuff(bishop, guendolen)\nSensitized(vitoria)\nSensitized(guendolen)\nforall x (Profiteer(x, guendolen) and Deathlike(guendolen) -> Profiteer(x, vitoria))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Curse(x, vitoria))\nforall x (Jawed(x) and Buff(x, vitoria) -> Profiteer(x, vitoria))\nforall x (Chinless(x) -> Curse(x, guendolen))\nforall x (Buff(x, guendolen) and Curse(x, guendolen) -> Buff(guendolen, bishop))\nforall x (Buff(x, guendolen) -> Chinless(x))\n\nnot Curse(bishop, guendolen)\n\nBuff(bishop, guendolen) and forall x (Buff(x, guendolen) -> Chinless(x)) -> therefore Chinless(bishop) Chinless(bishop) and forall x (Chinless(x) -> Curse(x, guendolen)) -> therefore Curse(bishop, guendolen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The bary rigidify the esma. The rycca is wolflike. The esma is wolflike. If someone commove the esma and the esma is allergic then they see the rycca. If someone is allergic then they chase the rycca. If someone is minatory and they eat the rycca then they see the rycca. If someone is hebridean then they chase the esma. If someone rigidify the esma and they chase the esma then the esma rigidify the bary. If someone rigidify the esma then they are hebridean. The esma rigidify the bary.", "logic": "\nRigidify(bary, esma)\nWolflike(rycca)\nWolflike(esma)\nforall x (Commove(x, esma) and Allergic(esma) -> Commove(x, rycca))\nforall x (Allergic(x) -> Demist(x, rycca))\nforall x (Minatory(x) and Rigidify(x, rycca) -> Commove(x, rycca))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) -> Demist(x, esma))\nforall x (Rigidify(x, esma) and Demist(x, esma) -> Rigidify(esma, bary))\nforall x (Rigidify(x, esma) -> Hebridean(x))\n\nRigidify(esma, bary)\n\nRigidify(bary, esma) and forall x (Rigidify(x, esma) -> Hebridean(x)) -> therefore Hebridean(bary) Hebridean(bary) and forall x (Hebridean(x) -> Demist(x, esma)) -> therefore Demist(bary, esma) Rigidify(bary, esma) and Demist(bary, esma) and forall x (Rigidify(x, esma) and Demist(x, esma) -> Rigidify(esma, bary)) -> therefore Rigidify(esma, bary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The lonni disclose the bianca. The anabel is fixed. The bianca is fixed. If someone creosote the bianca and the bianca is ivied then they see the anabel. If someone is ivied then they chase the anabel. If someone is unblushing and they eat the anabel then they see the anabel. If someone is soulless then they chase the bianca. If someone disclose the bianca and they chase the bianca then the bianca disclose the lonni. If someone disclose the bianca then they are soulless. The bianca does not eat the lonni.", "logic": "\nDisclose(lonni, bianca)\nFixed(anabel)\nFixed(bianca)\nforall x (Creosote(x, bianca) and Ivied(bianca) -> Creosote(x, anabel))\nforall x (Ivied(x) -> Wait(x, anabel))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and Disclose(x, anabel) -> Creosote(x, anabel))\nforall x (Soulless(x) -> Wait(x, bianca))\nforall x (Disclose(x, bianca) and Wait(x, bianca) -> Disclose(bianca, lonni))\nforall x (Disclose(x, bianca) -> Soulless(x))\n\nnot Disclose(bianca, lonni)\n\nDisclose(lonni, bianca) and forall x (Disclose(x, bianca) -> Soulless(x)) -> therefore Soulless(lonni) Soulless(lonni) and forall x (Soulless(x) -> Wait(x, bianca)) -> therefore Wait(lonni, bianca) Disclose(lonni, bianca) and Wait(lonni, bianca) and forall x (Disclose(x, bianca) and Wait(x, bianca) -> Disclose(bianca, lonni)) -> therefore Disclose(bianca, lonni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The josee belong the torrence. The sibelle is acaudate. The torrence is acaudate. If someone rock the torrence and the torrence is cervical then they see the sibelle. If someone is cervical then they chase the sibelle. If someone is dirigible and they eat the sibelle then they see the sibelle. If someone is willowy then they chase the torrence. If someone belong the torrence and they chase the torrence then the torrence belong the josee. If someone belong the torrence then they are willowy. The torrence does not see the sibelle.", "logic": "\nBelong(josee, torrence)\nAcaudate(sibelle)\nAcaudate(torrence)\nforall x (Rock(x, torrence) and Cervical(torrence) -> Rock(x, sibelle))\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Scum(x, sibelle))\nforall x (Dirigible(x) and Belong(x, sibelle) -> Rock(x, sibelle))\nforall x (Willowy(x) -> Scum(x, torrence))\nforall x (Belong(x, torrence) and Scum(x, torrence) -> Belong(torrence, josee))\nforall x (Belong(x, torrence) -> Willowy(x))\n\nnot Rock(torrence, sibelle)\n\nforall x (Rock(x, torrence) and Cervical(torrence) -> Rock(x, sibelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The vivien nark the elene. The helsa is gelid. The elene is gelid. If someone televise the elene and the elene is spayed then they see the helsa. If someone is spayed then they chase the helsa. If someone is baculiform and they eat the helsa then they see the helsa. If someone is lissom then they chase the elene. If someone nark the elene and they chase the elene then the elene nark the vivien. If someone nark the elene then they are lissom. The vivien televise the helsa.", "logic": "\nNark(vivien, elene)\nGelid(helsa)\nGelid(elene)\nforall x (Televise(x, elene) and Spayed(elene) -> Televise(x, helsa))\nforall x (Spayed(x) -> Excogitate(x, helsa))\nforall x (Baculiform(x) and Nark(x, helsa) -> Televise(x, helsa))\nforall x (Lissom(x) -> Excogitate(x, elene))\nforall x (Nark(x, elene) and Excogitate(x, elene) -> Nark(elene, vivien))\nforall x (Nark(x, elene) -> Lissom(x))\n\nTelevise(vivien, helsa)\n\nforall x (Televise(x, elene) and Spayed(elene) -> Televise(x, helsa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The gregor symphonize the sandye. The karrie is executable. The sandye is executable. If someone strike the sandye and the sandye is interwoven then they see the karrie. If someone is interwoven then they chase the karrie. If someone is ferric and they eat the karrie then they see the karrie. If someone is impolitic then they chase the sandye. If someone symphonize the sandye and they chase the sandye then the sandye symphonize the gregor. If someone symphonize the sandye then they are impolitic. The karrie does not chase the sandye.", "logic": "\nSymphonize(gregor, sandye)\nExecutable(karrie)\nExecutable(sandye)\nforall x (Strike(x, sandye) and Interwoven(sandye) -> Strike(x, karrie))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) -> Respire(x, karrie))\nforall x (Ferric(x) and Symphonize(x, karrie) -> Strike(x, karrie))\nforall x (Impolitic(x) -> Respire(x, sandye))\nforall x (Symphonize(x, sandye) and Respire(x, sandye) -> Symphonize(sandye, gregor))\nforall x (Symphonize(x, sandye) -> Impolitic(x))\n\nnot Respire(karrie, sandye)\n\nforall x (Impolitic(x) -> Respire(x, sandye)) <- forall x (Symphonize(x, sandye) -> Impolitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The angelique unbend the carlynn. The fredric is potent. The carlynn is potent. If someone opsonize the carlynn and the carlynn is bareback then they see the fredric. If someone is bareback then they chase the fredric. If someone is unassigned and they eat the fredric then they see the fredric. If someone is kindled then they chase the carlynn. If someone unbend the carlynn and they chase the carlynn then the carlynn unbend the angelique. If someone unbend the carlynn then they are kindled. The carlynn spatter the fredric.", "logic": "\nUnbend(angelique, carlynn)\nPotent(fredric)\nPotent(carlynn)\nforall x (Opsonize(x, carlynn) and Bareback(carlynn) -> Opsonize(x, fredric))\nforall x (Bareback(x) -> Spatter(x, fredric))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) and Unbend(x, fredric) -> Opsonize(x, fredric))\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Spatter(x, carlynn))\nforall x (Unbend(x, carlynn) and Spatter(x, carlynn) -> Unbend(carlynn, angelique))\nforall x (Unbend(x, carlynn) -> Kindled(x))\n\nSpatter(carlynn, fredric)\n\nforall x (Bareback(x) -> Spatter(x, fredric)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The verla unbalance the leia. The jenine is antigenic. The leia is antigenic. If someone thrill the leia and the leia is undrawn then they see the jenine. If someone is undrawn then they chase the jenine. If someone is impartial and they eat the jenine then they see the jenine. If someone is grotty then they chase the leia. If someone unbalance the leia and they chase the leia then the leia unbalance the verla. If someone unbalance the leia then they are grotty. The jenine is not blue.", "logic": "\nUnbalance(verla, leia)\nAntigenic(jenine)\nAntigenic(leia)\nforall x (Thrill(x, leia) and Undrawn(leia) -> Thrill(x, jenine))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) -> Fullback(x, jenine))\nforall x (Impartial(x) and Unbalance(x, jenine) -> Thrill(x, jenine))\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Fullback(x, leia))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, leia) and Fullback(x, leia) -> Unbalance(leia, verla))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, leia) -> Grotty(x))\n\nnot Blue(jenine)\n\nnot Blue(jenine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The josie commission the patti. The tia is haggard. The patti is haggard. If someone exsiccate the patti and the patti is tarry then they see the tia. If someone is tarry then they chase the tia. If someone is defiled and they eat the tia then they see the tia. If someone is ludicrous then they chase the patti. If someone commission the patti and they chase the patti then the patti commission the josie. If someone commission the patti then they are ludicrous. The patti exsiccate the patti.", "logic": "\nCommission(josie, patti)\nHaggard(tia)\nHaggard(patti)\nforall x (Exsiccate(x, patti) and Tarry(patti) -> Exsiccate(x, tia))\nforall x (Tarry(x) -> Rehear(x, tia))\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Commission(x, tia) -> Exsiccate(x, tia))\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) -> Rehear(x, patti))\nforall x (Commission(x, patti) and Rehear(x, patti) -> Commission(patti, josie))\nforall x (Commission(x, patti) -> Ludicrous(x))\n\nExsiccate(patti, patti)\n\nExsiccate(patti, patti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The mattias conspire the cyril. The magnus is yawning. The cyril is yawning. If someone lave the cyril and the cyril is acute then they see the magnus. If someone is acute then they chase the magnus. If someone is acinic and they eat the magnus then they see the magnus. If someone is wearisome then they chase the cyril. If someone conspire the cyril and they chase the cyril then the cyril conspire the mattias. If someone conspire the cyril then they are wearisome. The magnus is not acinic.", "logic": "\nConspire(mattias, cyril)\nYawning(magnus)\nYawning(cyril)\nforall x (Lave(x, cyril) and Acute(cyril) -> Lave(x, magnus))\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Copyedit(x, magnus))\nforall x (Acinic(x) and Conspire(x, magnus) -> Lave(x, magnus))\nforall x (Wearisome(x) -> Copyedit(x, cyril))\nforall x (Conspire(x, cyril) and Copyedit(x, cyril) -> Conspire(cyril, mattias))\nforall x (Conspire(x, cyril) -> Wearisome(x))\n\nnot Acinic(magnus)\n\nnot Acinic(magnus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "The darbie reshuffle the florence. The parker is osteal. The florence is osteal. If someone shamanize the florence and the florence is successive then they see the parker. If someone is successive then they chase the parker. If someone is obovate and they eat the parker then they see the parker. If someone is surpliced then they chase the florence. If someone reshuffle the florence and they chase the florence then the florence reshuffle the darbie. If someone reshuffle the florence then they are surpliced. The darbie shamanize the florence.", "logic": "\nReshuffle(darbie, florence)\nOsteal(parker)\nOsteal(florence)\nforall x (Shamanize(x, florence) and Successive(florence) -> Shamanize(x, parker))\nforall x (Successive(x) -> Ebonize(x, parker))\nforall x (Obovate(x) and Reshuffle(x, parker) -> Shamanize(x, parker))\nforall x (Surpliced(x) -> Ebonize(x, florence))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, florence) and Ebonize(x, florence) -> Reshuffle(florence, darbie))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, florence) -> Surpliced(x))\n\nShamanize(darbie, florence)\n\nShamanize(darbie, florence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1456"} {"premises": "Barclay is samoan. Barclay is expedient. Barclay is flavorless. Madona is violet. Madona is samoan. Madona is older. Madona is expedient. Madona is flavorless. Madona is anestric. Coralie is limbic. Coralie is violet. Coralie is samoan. Coralie is older. Coralie is expedient. Coralie is flavorless. Coralie is anestric. All samoan things are limbic. If something is violet and not samoan then it is limbic. If something is expedient and not samoan then it is older. If something is samoan and older then it is flavorless. If something is limbic then it is anestric. If something is expedient and not older then it is anestric. Madona is expedient.", "logic": "\nSamoan(barclay)\nExpedient(barclay)\nFlavorless(barclay)\nViolet(madona)\nSamoan(madona)\nOlder(madona)\nExpedient(madona)\nFlavorless(madona)\nAnestric(madona)\nLimbic(coralie)\nViolet(coralie)\nSamoan(coralie)\nOlder(coralie)\nExpedient(coralie)\nFlavorless(coralie)\nAnestric(coralie)\nforall x (Samoan(x) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Violet(x) and not Samoan(x) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) and not Samoan(x) -> Older(x))\nforall x (Samoan(x) and Older(x) -> Flavorless(x))\nforall x (Limbic(x) -> Anestric(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) and not Older(x) -> Anestric(x))\n\nExpedient(madona)\n\ntherefore Expedient(madona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Pamela is brownish. Pamela is nonionic. Pamela is bastard. Tremaine is icteric. Tremaine is brownish. Tremaine is ruby. Tremaine is nonionic. Tremaine is bastard. Tremaine is peaceful. Irita is palatial. Irita is icteric. Irita is brownish. Irita is ruby. Irita is nonionic. Irita is bastard. Irita is peaceful. All brownish things are palatial. If something is icteric and not brownish then it is palatial. If something is nonionic and not brownish then it is ruby. If something is brownish and ruby then it is bastard. If something is palatial then it is peaceful. If something is nonionic and not ruby then it is peaceful. Irita is not ruby.", "logic": "\nBrownish(pamela)\nNonionic(pamela)\nBastard(pamela)\nIcteric(tremaine)\nBrownish(tremaine)\nRuby(tremaine)\nNonionic(tremaine)\nBastard(tremaine)\nPeaceful(tremaine)\nPalatial(irita)\nIcteric(irita)\nBrownish(irita)\nRuby(irita)\nNonionic(irita)\nBastard(irita)\nPeaceful(irita)\nforall x (Brownish(x) -> Palatial(x))\nforall x (Icteric(x) and not Brownish(x) -> Palatial(x))\nforall x (Nonionic(x) and not Brownish(x) -> Ruby(x))\nforall x (Brownish(x) and Ruby(x) -> Bastard(x))\nforall x (Palatial(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Nonionic(x) and not Ruby(x) -> Peaceful(x))\n\nnot Ruby(irita)\n\ntherefore Ruby(irita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Cherry is stolid. Cherry is centered. Cherry is barricaded. Elroy is mucky. Elroy is stolid. Elroy is awol. Elroy is centered. Elroy is barricaded. Elroy is imputable. Jorie is unskillful. Jorie is mucky. Jorie is stolid. Jorie is awol. Jorie is centered. Jorie is barricaded. Jorie is imputable. All stolid things are unskillful. If something is mucky and not stolid then it is unskillful. If something is centered and not stolid then it is awol. If something is stolid and awol then it is barricaded. If something is unskillful then it is imputable. If something is centered and not awol then it is imputable. Cherry is unskillful.", "logic": "\nStolid(cherry)\nCentered(cherry)\nBarricaded(cherry)\nMucky(elroy)\nStolid(elroy)\nAwol(elroy)\nCentered(elroy)\nBarricaded(elroy)\nImputable(elroy)\nUnskillful(jorie)\nMucky(jorie)\nStolid(jorie)\nAwol(jorie)\nCentered(jorie)\nBarricaded(jorie)\nImputable(jorie)\nforall x (Stolid(x) -> Unskillful(x))\nforall x (Mucky(x) and not Stolid(x) -> Unskillful(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) and not Stolid(x) -> Awol(x))\nforall x (Stolid(x) and Awol(x) -> Barricaded(x))\nforall x (Unskillful(x) -> Imputable(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) and not Awol(x) -> Imputable(x))\n\nUnskillful(cherry)\n\nStolid(cherry) and forall x (Stolid(x) -> Unskillful(x)) -> therefore Unskillful(cherry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Thomasine is knackered. Thomasine is mourning. Thomasine is detested. Rosana is fathomable. Rosana is knackered. Rosana is botulinal. Rosana is mourning. Rosana is detested. Rosana is luculent. Fonz is spheric. Fonz is fathomable. Fonz is knackered. Fonz is botulinal. Fonz is mourning. Fonz is detested. Fonz is luculent. All knackered things are spheric. If something is fathomable and not knackered then it is spheric. If something is mourning and not knackered then it is botulinal. If something is knackered and botulinal then it is detested. If something is spheric then it is luculent. If something is mourning and not botulinal then it is luculent. Rosana is not spheric.", "logic": "\nKnackered(thomasine)\nMourning(thomasine)\nDetested(thomasine)\nFathomable(rosana)\nKnackered(rosana)\nBotulinal(rosana)\nMourning(rosana)\nDetested(rosana)\nLuculent(rosana)\nSpheric(fonz)\nFathomable(fonz)\nKnackered(fonz)\nBotulinal(fonz)\nMourning(fonz)\nDetested(fonz)\nLuculent(fonz)\nforall x (Knackered(x) -> Spheric(x))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) and not Knackered(x) -> Spheric(x))\nforall x (Mourning(x) and not Knackered(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Knackered(x) and Botulinal(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Spheric(x) -> Luculent(x))\nforall x (Mourning(x) and not Botulinal(x) -> Luculent(x))\n\nnot Spheric(rosana)\n\nKnackered(rosana) and forall x (Knackered(x) -> Spheric(x)) -> therefore Spheric(rosana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Drew is logistic. Drew is wooden. Drew is cachectic. Suellen is nettlesome. Suellen is logistic. Suellen is waxed. Suellen is wooden. Suellen is cachectic. Suellen is depilatory. Lilia is miscible. Lilia is nettlesome. Lilia is logistic. Lilia is waxed. Lilia is wooden. Lilia is cachectic. Lilia is depilatory. All logistic things are miscible. If something is nettlesome and not logistic then it is miscible. If something is wooden and not logistic then it is waxed. If something is logistic and waxed then it is cachectic. If something is miscible then it is depilatory. If something is wooden and not waxed then it is depilatory. Drew is depilatory.", "logic": "\nLogistic(drew)\nWooden(drew)\nCachectic(drew)\nNettlesome(suellen)\nLogistic(suellen)\nWaxed(suellen)\nWooden(suellen)\nCachectic(suellen)\nDepilatory(suellen)\nMiscible(lilia)\nNettlesome(lilia)\nLogistic(lilia)\nWaxed(lilia)\nWooden(lilia)\nCachectic(lilia)\nDepilatory(lilia)\nforall x (Logistic(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Nettlesome(x) and not Logistic(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Wooden(x) and not Logistic(x) -> Waxed(x))\nforall x (Logistic(x) and Waxed(x) -> Cachectic(x))\nforall x (Miscible(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nforall x (Wooden(x) and not Waxed(x) -> Depilatory(x))\n\nDepilatory(drew)\n\nLogistic(drew) and forall x (Logistic(x) -> Miscible(x)) -> therefore Miscible(drew) Miscible(drew) and forall x (Miscible(x) -> Depilatory(x)) -> therefore Depilatory(drew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Allen is unawakened. Allen is agnate. Allen is prudential. Pippa is reticular. Pippa is unawakened. Pippa is nether. Pippa is agnate. Pippa is prudential. Pippa is inland. Oswell is twee. Oswell is reticular. Oswell is unawakened. Oswell is nether. Oswell is agnate. Oswell is prudential. Oswell is inland. All unawakened things are twee. If something is reticular and not unawakened then it is twee. If something is agnate and not unawakened then it is nether. If something is unawakened and nether then it is prudential. If something is twee then it is inland. If something is agnate and not nether then it is inland. Allen is not inland.", "logic": "\nUnawakened(allen)\nAgnate(allen)\nPrudential(allen)\nReticular(pippa)\nUnawakened(pippa)\nNether(pippa)\nAgnate(pippa)\nPrudential(pippa)\nInland(pippa)\nTwee(oswell)\nReticular(oswell)\nUnawakened(oswell)\nNether(oswell)\nAgnate(oswell)\nPrudential(oswell)\nInland(oswell)\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Reticular(x) and not Unawakened(x) -> Twee(x))\nforall x (Agnate(x) and not Unawakened(x) -> Nether(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and Nether(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Twee(x) -> Inland(x))\nforall x (Agnate(x) and not Nether(x) -> Inland(x))\n\nnot Inland(allen)\n\nUnawakened(allen) and forall x (Unawakened(x) -> Twee(x)) -> therefore Twee(allen) Twee(allen) and forall x (Twee(x) -> Inland(x)) -> therefore Inland(allen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Traver is privileged. Traver is afghani. Traver is cross. Roxy is modular. Roxy is privileged. Roxy is fond. Roxy is afghani. Roxy is cross. Roxy is dismissive. Christi is climatical. Christi is modular. Christi is privileged. Christi is fond. Christi is afghani. Christi is cross. Christi is dismissive. All privileged things are climatical. If something is modular and not privileged then it is climatical. If something is afghani and not privileged then it is fond. If something is privileged and fond then it is cross. If something is climatical then it is dismissive. If something is afghani and not fond then it is dismissive. Traver is not fond.", "logic": "\nPrivileged(traver)\nAfghani(traver)\nCross(traver)\nModular(roxy)\nPrivileged(roxy)\nFond(roxy)\nAfghani(roxy)\nCross(roxy)\nDismissive(roxy)\nClimatical(christi)\nModular(christi)\nPrivileged(christi)\nFond(christi)\nAfghani(christi)\nCross(christi)\nDismissive(christi)\nforall x (Privileged(x) -> Climatical(x))\nforall x (Modular(x) and not Privileged(x) -> Climatical(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) and not Privileged(x) -> Fond(x))\nforall x (Privileged(x) and Fond(x) -> Cross(x))\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) and not Fond(x) -> Dismissive(x))\n\nnot Fond(traver)\n\nforall x (Afghani(x) and not Privileged(x) -> Fond(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "Beaufort is storeyed. Beaufort is cockney. Beaufort is nameless. Dorey is antiguan. Dorey is storeyed. Dorey is brotherly. Dorey is cockney. Dorey is nameless. Dorey is egoistical. Lusa is awol. Lusa is antiguan. Lusa is storeyed. Lusa is brotherly. Lusa is cockney. Lusa is nameless. Lusa is egoistical. All storeyed things are awol. If something is antiguan and not storeyed then it is awol. If something is cockney and not storeyed then it is brotherly. If something is storeyed and brotherly then it is nameless. If something is awol then it is egoistical. If something is cockney and not brotherly then it is egoistical. Beaufort is antiguan.", "logic": "\nStoreyed(beaufort)\nCockney(beaufort)\nNameless(beaufort)\nAntiguan(dorey)\nStoreyed(dorey)\nBrotherly(dorey)\nCockney(dorey)\nNameless(dorey)\nEgoistical(dorey)\nAwol(lusa)\nAntiguan(lusa)\nStoreyed(lusa)\nBrotherly(lusa)\nCockney(lusa)\nNameless(lusa)\nEgoistical(lusa)\nforall x (Storeyed(x) -> Awol(x))\nforall x (Antiguan(x) and not Storeyed(x) -> Awol(x))\nforall x (Cockney(x) and not Storeyed(x) -> Brotherly(x))\nforall x (Storeyed(x) and Brotherly(x) -> Nameless(x))\nforall x (Awol(x) -> Egoistical(x))\nforall x (Cockney(x) and not Brotherly(x) -> Egoistical(x))\n\nAntiguan(beaufort)\n\nAntiguan(beaufort) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-206"} {"premises": "The kalle does not eat the lolita. The kalle resift the daryle. The kalle is debauched. The kalle is hackneyed. The kalle unsaddle the daryle. The lolita is amniotic. The lolita unsaddle the kalle. The lolita accoutre the kalle. The daryle resift the lolita. The daryle is not debauched. The daryle unsaddle the lolita. The daryle accoutre the lolita. If the daryle accoutre the kalle and the daryle is debauched then the daryle does not need the kalle. The daryle unsaddle the lolita.", "logic": "\nnot Resift(kalle, lolita)\nResift(kalle, daryle)\nDebauched(kalle)\nHackneyed(kalle)\nUnsaddle(kalle, daryle)\nAmniotic(lolita)\nUnsaddle(lolita, kalle)\nAccoutre(lolita, kalle)\nResift(daryle, lolita)\nnot Debauched(daryle)\nUnsaddle(daryle, lolita)\nAccoutre(daryle, lolita)\nAccoutre(daryle, kalle) and Debauched(daryle) -> not Unsaddle(daryle, kalle)\n\nUnsaddle(daryle, lolita)\n\ntherefore Unsaddle(daryle, lolita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1536"} {"premises": "The margareta does not eat the shannen. The margareta nick the janaye. The margareta is flushed. The margareta is crownless. The margareta autotomize the janaye. The shannen is swept. The shannen autotomize the margareta. The shannen wrick the margareta. The janaye nick the shannen. The janaye is not flushed. The janaye autotomize the shannen. The janaye wrick the shannen. If the janaye wrick the margareta and the janaye is flushed then the janaye does not need the margareta. The janaye does not eat the shannen.", "logic": "\nnot Nick(margareta, shannen)\nNick(margareta, janaye)\nFlushed(margareta)\nCrownless(margareta)\nAutotomize(margareta, janaye)\nSwept(shannen)\nAutotomize(shannen, margareta)\nWrick(shannen, margareta)\nNick(janaye, shannen)\nnot Flushed(janaye)\nAutotomize(janaye, shannen)\nWrick(janaye, shannen)\nWrick(janaye, margareta) and Flushed(janaye) -> not Autotomize(janaye, margareta)\n\nnot Nick(janaye, shannen)\n\ntherefore Nick(janaye, shannen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1536"} {"premises": "The berta does not eat the aigneis. The berta oxygenise the odilia. The berta is imposed. The berta is butch. The berta keel the odilia. The aigneis is surreal. The aigneis keel the berta. The aigneis slump the berta. The odilia oxygenise the aigneis. The odilia is not imposed. The odilia keel the aigneis. The odilia slump the aigneis. If the odilia slump the berta and the odilia is imposed then the odilia does not need the berta. The odilia is not blue.", "logic": "\nnot Oxygenise(berta, aigneis)\nOxygenise(berta, odilia)\nImposed(berta)\nButch(berta)\nKeel(berta, odilia)\nSurreal(aigneis)\nKeel(aigneis, berta)\nSlump(aigneis, berta)\nOxygenise(odilia, aigneis)\nnot Imposed(odilia)\nKeel(odilia, aigneis)\nSlump(odilia, aigneis)\nSlump(odilia, berta) and Imposed(odilia) -> not Keel(odilia, berta)\n\nnot Blue(odilia)\n\nnot Blue(odilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1536"} {"premises": "The mitchell does not eat the chariot. The mitchell park the milt. The mitchell is unlearned. The mitchell is ungainly. The mitchell organise the milt. The chariot is bobtail. The chariot organise the mitchell. The chariot hamper the mitchell. The milt park the chariot. The milt is not unlearned. The milt organise the chariot. The milt hamper the chariot. If the milt hamper the mitchell and the milt is unlearned then the milt does not need the mitchell. The mitchell park the mitchell.", "logic": "\nnot Park(mitchell, chariot)\nPark(mitchell, milt)\nUnlearned(mitchell)\nUngainly(mitchell)\nOrganise(mitchell, milt)\nBobtail(chariot)\nOrganise(chariot, mitchell)\nHamper(chariot, mitchell)\nPark(milt, chariot)\nnot Unlearned(milt)\nOrganise(milt, chariot)\nHamper(milt, chariot)\nHamper(milt, mitchell) and Unlearned(milt) -> not Organise(milt, mitchell)\n\nPark(mitchell, mitchell)\n\nPark(mitchell, mitchell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1536"} {"premises": "Dori is stunted. Dori is not zoological. Dori is not posthumous. Shani is zoological. Shani is insurgent. Kimmo is stunted. Meggie is not stunted. If someone is zoological then they are taxing. If someone is posthumous then they are real. If Shani is taxing and Shani is not real then Shani is not insurgent. Shani is insurgent.", "logic": "\nStunted(dori)\nnot Zoological(dori)\nnot Posthumous(dori)\nZoological(shani)\nInsurgent(shani)\nStunted(kimmo)\nnot Stunted(meggie)\nforall x (Zoological(x) -> Taxing(x))\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Real(x))\nTaxing(shani) and not Real(shani) -> not Insurgent(shani)\n\nInsurgent(shani)\n\ntherefore Insurgent(shani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Kendall is errorless. Kendall is not quadruple. Kendall is not offstage. Gayla is quadruple. Gayla is continuant. Belicia is errorless. Hailee is not errorless. If someone is quadruple then they are dorian. If someone is offstage then they are voluptuary. If Gayla is dorian and Gayla is not voluptuary then Gayla is not continuant. Gayla is not continuant.", "logic": "\nErrorless(kendall)\nnot Quadruple(kendall)\nnot Offstage(kendall)\nQuadruple(gayla)\nContinuant(gayla)\nErrorless(belicia)\nnot Errorless(hailee)\nforall x (Quadruple(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Voluptuary(x))\nDorian(gayla) and not Voluptuary(gayla) -> not Continuant(gayla)\n\nnot Continuant(gayla)\n\ntherefore Continuant(gayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Andie is unplaced. Andie is not nightly. Andie is not dropping. Joletta is nightly. Joletta is improved. Nanine is unplaced. Adolph is not unplaced. If someone is nightly then they are digital. If someone is dropping then they are motivative. If Joletta is digital and Joletta is not motivative then Joletta is not improved. Joletta is digital.", "logic": "\nUnplaced(andie)\nnot Nightly(andie)\nnot Dropping(andie)\nNightly(joletta)\nImproved(joletta)\nUnplaced(nanine)\nnot Unplaced(adolph)\nforall x (Nightly(x) -> Digital(x))\nforall x (Dropping(x) -> Motivative(x))\nDigital(joletta) and not Motivative(joletta) -> not Improved(joletta)\n\nDigital(joletta)\n\nNightly(joletta) and forall x (Nightly(x) -> Digital(x)) -> therefore Digital(joletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Maxine is airy. Maxine is not ironlike. Maxine is not planless. Brigit is ironlike. Brigit is ironic. Rachele is airy. Parker is not airy. If someone is ironlike then they are vexed. If someone is planless then they are jolly. If Brigit is vexed and Brigit is not jolly then Brigit is not ironic. Brigit is not vexed.", "logic": "\nAiry(maxine)\nnot Ironlike(maxine)\nnot Planless(maxine)\nIronlike(brigit)\nIronic(brigit)\nAiry(rachele)\nnot Airy(parker)\nforall x (Ironlike(x) -> Vexed(x))\nforall x (Planless(x) -> Jolly(x))\nVexed(brigit) and not Jolly(brigit) -> not Ironic(brigit)\n\nnot Vexed(brigit)\n\nIronlike(brigit) and forall x (Ironlike(x) -> Vexed(x)) -> therefore Vexed(brigit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Cris is draconian. Cris is not leftish. Cris is not revolting. Gwendolen is leftish. Gwendolen is ergotropic. Hewet is draconian. Ianthe is not draconian. If someone is leftish then they are conic. If someone is revolting then they are paramount. If Gwendolen is conic and Gwendolen is not paramount then Gwendolen is not ergotropic. Ianthe is not paramount.", "logic": "\nDraconian(cris)\nnot Leftish(cris)\nnot Revolting(cris)\nLeftish(gwendolen)\nErgotropic(gwendolen)\nDraconian(hewet)\nnot Draconian(ianthe)\nforall x (Leftish(x) -> Conic(x))\nforall x (Revolting(x) -> Paramount(x))\nConic(gwendolen) and not Paramount(gwendolen) -> not Ergotropic(gwendolen)\n\nnot Paramount(ianthe)\n\nforall x (Revolting(x) -> Paramount(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Ania is battleful. Ania is not other. Ania is not ataxic. Philippe is other. Philippe is booted. Dove is battleful. Carlynn is not battleful. If someone is other then they are muscovite. If someone is ataxic then they are vigorous. If Philippe is muscovite and Philippe is not vigorous then Philippe is not booted. Carlynn is muscovite.", "logic": "\nBattleful(ania)\nnot Other(ania)\nnot Ataxic(ania)\nOther(philippe)\nBooted(philippe)\nBattleful(dove)\nnot Battleful(carlynn)\nforall x (Other(x) -> Muscovite(x))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) -> Vigorous(x))\nMuscovite(philippe) and not Vigorous(philippe) -> not Booted(philippe)\n\nMuscovite(carlynn)\n\nforall x (Other(x) -> Muscovite(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Andrej is positivist. Andrej is not unopened. Andrej is not mental. Adger is unopened. Adger is gloomful. Riki is positivist. Morlee is not positivist. If someone is unopened then they are tasteless. If someone is mental then they are notional. If Adger is tasteless and Adger is not notional then Adger is not gloomful. Adger is not positivist.", "logic": "\nPositivist(andrej)\nnot Unopened(andrej)\nnot Mental(andrej)\nUnopened(adger)\nGloomful(adger)\nPositivist(riki)\nnot Positivist(morlee)\nforall x (Unopened(x) -> Tasteless(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) -> Notional(x))\nTasteless(adger) and not Notional(adger) -> not Gloomful(adger)\n\nnot Positivist(adger)\n\nnot Positivist(adger) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Gaby is tusked. Gaby is not agrologic. Gaby is not distant. Delphinia is agrologic. Delphinia is intact. Natka is tusked. Natassia is not tusked. If someone is agrologic then they are exogamic. If someone is distant then they are motorial. If Delphinia is exogamic and Delphinia is not motorial then Delphinia is not intact. Natassia is agrologic.", "logic": "\nTusked(gaby)\nnot Agrologic(gaby)\nnot Distant(gaby)\nAgrologic(delphinia)\nIntact(delphinia)\nTusked(natka)\nnot Tusked(natassia)\nforall x (Agrologic(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Motorial(x))\nExogamic(delphinia) and not Motorial(delphinia) -> not Intact(delphinia)\n\nAgrologic(natassia)\n\nAgrologic(natassia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2474"} {"premises": "Zola is salmon. All salmon people are cliched. Rough, fledgling people are not cliched. Green, cliched people are fledgling. If someone is unexcused and not salmon then they are electoral. All cliched people are electoral. If Zola is electoral then Zola is fledgling. Zola is salmon.", "logic": "\nSalmon(zola)\nforall x (Salmon(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) and Fledgling(x) -> not Cliched(x))\nforall x (Electoral(x) and Cliched(x) -> Fledgling(x))\nforall x (Unexcused(x) and not Salmon(x) -> Electoral(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Electoral(x))\nElectoral(zola) -> Fledgling(zola)\n\nSalmon(zola)\n\ntherefore Salmon(zola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Wynne is myalgic. All myalgic people are decussate. Rough, rude people are not decussate. Green, decussate people are rude. If someone is symmetric and not myalgic then they are jade. All decussate people are jade. If Wynne is jade then Wynne is rude. Wynne is not myalgic.", "logic": "\nMyalgic(wynne)\nforall x (Myalgic(x) -> Decussate(x))\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) and Rude(x) -> not Decussate(x))\nforall x (Jade(x) and Decussate(x) -> Rude(x))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and not Myalgic(x) -> Jade(x))\nforall x (Decussate(x) -> Jade(x))\nJade(wynne) -> Rude(wynne)\n\nnot Myalgic(wynne)\n\ntherefore Myalgic(wynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Vittoria is fencelike. All fencelike people are endodontic. Rough, obvious people are not endodontic. Green, endodontic people are obvious. If someone is novel and not fencelike then they are ungulate. All endodontic people are ungulate. If Vittoria is ungulate then Vittoria is obvious. Vittoria is endodontic.", "logic": "\nFencelike(vittoria)\nforall x (Fencelike(x) -> Endodontic(x))\nforall x (Seditious(x) and Obvious(x) -> not Endodontic(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and Endodontic(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Novel(x) and not Fencelike(x) -> Ungulate(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) -> Ungulate(x))\nUngulate(vittoria) -> Obvious(vittoria)\n\nEndodontic(vittoria)\n\nFencelike(vittoria) and forall x (Fencelike(x) -> Endodontic(x)) -> therefore Endodontic(vittoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Othilia is stressful. All stressful people are harmonic. Rough, lxxvi people are not harmonic. Green, harmonic people are lxxvi. If someone is moldovan and not stressful then they are roasted. All harmonic people are roasted. If Othilia is roasted then Othilia is lxxvi. Othilia is not harmonic.", "logic": "\nStressful(othilia)\nforall x (Stressful(x) -> Harmonic(x))\nforall x (Extendable(x) and Lxxvi(x) -> not Harmonic(x))\nforall x (Roasted(x) and Harmonic(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Moldovan(x) and not Stressful(x) -> Roasted(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) -> Roasted(x))\nRoasted(othilia) -> Lxxvi(othilia)\n\nnot Harmonic(othilia)\n\nStressful(othilia) and forall x (Stressful(x) -> Harmonic(x)) -> therefore Harmonic(othilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Kata is penniless. All penniless people are unpromised. Rough, honeylike people are not unpromised. Green, unpromised people are honeylike. If someone is petaled and not penniless then they are star. All unpromised people are star. If Kata is star then Kata is honeylike. Kata is star.", "logic": "\nPenniless(kata)\nforall x (Penniless(x) -> Unpromised(x))\nforall x (Tuppeny(x) and Honeylike(x) -> not Unpromised(x))\nforall x (Star(x) and Unpromised(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Petaled(x) and not Penniless(x) -> Star(x))\nforall x (Unpromised(x) -> Star(x))\nStar(kata) -> Honeylike(kata)\n\nStar(kata)\n\nPenniless(kata) and forall x (Penniless(x) -> Unpromised(x)) -> therefore Unpromised(kata) Unpromised(kata) and forall x (Unpromised(x) -> Star(x)) -> therefore Star(kata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Harvard is raring. All raring people are wearing. Rough, gargantuan people are not wearing. Green, wearing people are gargantuan. If someone is anticipant and not raring then they are withering. All wearing people are withering. If Harvard is withering then Harvard is gargantuan. Harvard is not withering.", "logic": "\nRaring(harvard)\nforall x (Raring(x) -> Wearing(x))\nforall x (Anatropous(x) and Gargantuan(x) -> not Wearing(x))\nforall x (Withering(x) and Wearing(x) -> Gargantuan(x))\nforall x (Anticipant(x) and not Raring(x) -> Withering(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) -> Withering(x))\nWithering(harvard) -> Gargantuan(harvard)\n\nnot Withering(harvard)\n\nRaring(harvard) and forall x (Raring(x) -> Wearing(x)) -> therefore Wearing(harvard) Wearing(harvard) and forall x (Wearing(x) -> Withering(x)) -> therefore Withering(harvard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Bill is overfond. All overfond people are defoliated. Rough, flexile people are not defoliated. Green, defoliated people are flexile. If someone is achromous and not overfond then they are brainsick. All defoliated people are brainsick. If Bill is brainsick then Bill is flexile. Bill is flexile.", "logic": "\nOverfond(bill)\nforall x (Overfond(x) -> Defoliated(x))\nforall x (Bruneian(x) and Flexile(x) -> not Defoliated(x))\nforall x (Brainsick(x) and Defoliated(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Achromous(x) and not Overfond(x) -> Brainsick(x))\nforall x (Defoliated(x) -> Brainsick(x))\nBrainsick(bill) -> Flexile(bill)\n\nFlexile(bill)\n\nOverfond(bill) and forall x (Overfond(x) -> Defoliated(x)) -> therefore Defoliated(bill) Defoliated(bill) and forall x (Defoliated(x) -> Brainsick(x)) -> therefore Brainsick(bill) Brainsick(bill) and Brainsick(bill) -> Flexile(bill) -> therefore Flexile(bill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Gae is fibrillose. All fibrillose people are stewed. Rough, acrophobic people are not stewed. Green, stewed people are acrophobic. If someone is shredded and not fibrillose then they are isopteran. All stewed people are isopteran. If Gae is isopteran then Gae is acrophobic. Gae is not acrophobic.", "logic": "\nFibrillose(gae)\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Stewed(x))\nforall x (Bunglesome(x) and Acrophobic(x) -> not Stewed(x))\nforall x (Isopteran(x) and Stewed(x) -> Acrophobic(x))\nforall x (Shredded(x) and not Fibrillose(x) -> Isopteran(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) -> Isopteran(x))\nIsopteran(gae) -> Acrophobic(gae)\n\nnot Acrophobic(gae)\n\nFibrillose(gae) and forall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Stewed(x)) -> therefore Stewed(gae) Stewed(gae) and forall x (Stewed(x) -> Isopteran(x)) -> therefore Isopteran(gae) Isopteran(gae) and Isopteran(gae) -> Acrophobic(gae) -> therefore Acrophobic(gae)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Tedda is riskless. All riskless people are prejudiced. Rough, vicinal people are not prejudiced. Green, prejudiced people are vicinal. If someone is unalloyed and not riskless then they are nipping. All prejudiced people are nipping. If Tedda is nipping then Tedda is vicinal. Tedda is not blue.", "logic": "\nRiskless(tedda)\nforall x (Riskless(x) -> Prejudiced(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) and Vicinal(x) -> not Prejudiced(x))\nforall x (Nipping(x) and Prejudiced(x) -> Vicinal(x))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) and not Riskless(x) -> Nipping(x))\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) -> Nipping(x))\nNipping(tedda) -> Vicinal(tedda)\n\nnot Blue(tedda)\n\nnot Blue(tedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Cristi is bilious. All bilious people are sunken. Rough, irksome people are not sunken. Green, sunken people are irksome. If someone is orderly and not bilious then they are friable. All sunken people are friable. If Cristi is friable then Cristi is irksome. Cristi is orderly.", "logic": "\nBilious(cristi)\nforall x (Bilious(x) -> Sunken(x))\nforall x (Allergic(x) and Irksome(x) -> not Sunken(x))\nforall x (Friable(x) and Sunken(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) and not Bilious(x) -> Friable(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> Friable(x))\nFriable(cristi) -> Irksome(cristi)\n\nOrderly(cristi)\n\nOrderly(cristi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "The stearne is warning. If someone is adored then they are anesthetic. If someone is warning then they are mixable. Rough, mixable people are adored. The stearne is warning.", "logic": "\nWarning(stearne)\nforall x (Adored(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Mixable(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and Mixable(x) -> Adored(x))\n\nWarning(stearne)\n\ntherefore Warning(stearne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The enoch is nonmusical. If someone is nonrigid then they are grey. If someone is nonmusical then they are lactating. Rough, lactating people are nonrigid. The enoch is not nonmusical.", "logic": "\nNonmusical(enoch)\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) -> Grey(x))\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) and Lactating(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\n\nnot Nonmusical(enoch)\n\ntherefore Nonmusical(enoch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The lulu is berrylike. If someone is corbelled then they are partible. If someone is berrylike then they are autonomic. Rough, autonomic people are corbelled. The lulu is autonomic.", "logic": "\nBerrylike(lulu)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) -> Autonomic(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and Autonomic(x) -> Corbelled(x))\n\nAutonomic(lulu)\n\nBerrylike(lulu) and forall x (Berrylike(x) -> Autonomic(x)) -> therefore Autonomic(lulu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The yettie is westmost. If someone is bedless then they are uneconomic. If someone is westmost then they are pursuant. Rough, pursuant people are bedless. The yettie is not pursuant.", "logic": "\nWestmost(yettie)\nforall x (Bedless(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Westmost(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Westmost(x) and Pursuant(x) -> Bedless(x))\n\nnot Pursuant(yettie)\n\nWestmost(yettie) and forall x (Westmost(x) -> Pursuant(x)) -> therefore Pursuant(yettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The cayla is crabbed. If someone is depilatory then they are queenlike. If someone is crabbed then they are atrip. Rough, atrip people are depilatory. The cayla is depilatory.", "logic": "\nCrabbed(cayla)\nforall x (Depilatory(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Atrip(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) and Atrip(x) -> Depilatory(x))\n\nDepilatory(cayla)\n\nCrabbed(cayla) and forall x (Crabbed(x) -> Atrip(x)) -> therefore Atrip(cayla) Crabbed(cayla) and Atrip(cayla) and forall x (Crabbed(x) and Atrip(x) -> Depilatory(x)) -> therefore Depilatory(cayla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The moreen is avellane. If someone is moronic then they are tref. If someone is avellane then they are cilial. Rough, cilial people are moronic. The moreen is not moronic.", "logic": "\nAvellane(moreen)\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Tref(x))\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Cilial(x))\nforall x (Avellane(x) and Cilial(x) -> Moronic(x))\n\nnot Moronic(moreen)\n\nAvellane(moreen) and forall x (Avellane(x) -> Cilial(x)) -> therefore Cilial(moreen) Avellane(moreen) and Cilial(moreen) and forall x (Avellane(x) and Cilial(x) -> Moronic(x)) -> therefore Moronic(moreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The clair is perfect. If someone is titular then they are groggy. If someone is perfect then they are iridic. Rough, iridic people are titular. The clair is groggy.", "logic": "\nPerfect(clair)\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Groggy(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) -> Iridic(x))\nforall x (Perfect(x) and Iridic(x) -> Titular(x))\n\nGroggy(clair)\n\nPerfect(clair) and forall x (Perfect(x) -> Iridic(x)) -> therefore Iridic(clair) Perfect(clair) and Iridic(clair) and forall x (Perfect(x) and Iridic(x) -> Titular(x)) -> therefore Titular(clair) Titular(clair) and forall x (Titular(x) -> Groggy(x)) -> therefore Groggy(clair)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The averyl is disyllabic. If someone is ambivalent then they are blastular. If someone is disyllabic then they are landscaped. Rough, landscaped people are ambivalent. The averyl is not blastular.", "logic": "\nDisyllabic(averyl)\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Disyllabic(x) -> Landscaped(x))\nforall x (Disyllabic(x) and Landscaped(x) -> Ambivalent(x))\n\nnot Blastular(averyl)\n\nDisyllabic(averyl) and forall x (Disyllabic(x) -> Landscaped(x)) -> therefore Landscaped(averyl) Disyllabic(averyl) and Landscaped(averyl) and forall x (Disyllabic(x) and Landscaped(x) -> Ambivalent(x)) -> therefore Ambivalent(averyl) Ambivalent(averyl) and forall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Blastular(x)) -> therefore Blastular(averyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The diena is apteral. If someone is spiffy then they are darling. If someone is apteral then they are resinated. Rough, resinated people are spiffy. The diena does not like the diena.", "logic": "\nApteral(diena)\nforall x (Spiffy(x) -> Darling(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) -> Resinated(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) and Resinated(x) -> Spiffy(x))\n\nnot Likes(diena, diena)\n\nnot Likes(diena, diena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The heather is soft. If someone is taxpaying then they are vagabond. If someone is soft then they are droopy. Rough, droopy people are taxpaying. The heather sees the heather.", "logic": "\nSoft(heather)\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Vagabond(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) and Droopy(x) -> Taxpaying(x))\n\nSees(heather, heather)\n\nSees(heather, heather) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The cammie is explicit. If someone is clangorous then they are presto. If someone is explicit then they are crying. Rough, crying people are clangorous. The cammie is not round.", "logic": "\nExplicit(cammie)\nforall x (Clangorous(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Explicit(x) -> Crying(x))\nforall x (Explicit(x) and Crying(x) -> Clangorous(x))\n\nnot Round(cammie)\n\nnot Round(cammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "The mel is coccygeal. If someone is fervid then they are impeding. If someone is coccygeal then they are binucleate. Rough, binucleate people are fervid. The mel visits the mel.", "logic": "\nCoccygeal(mel)\nforall x (Fervid(x) -> Impeding(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) and Binucleate(x) -> Fervid(x))\n\nVisits(mel, mel)\n\nVisits(mel, mel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-287"} {"premises": "Lyda is demotic. Lyda is dripless. Lyda is tsaristic. Lyda is rapt. Lyda is dissident. Orella is dripless. Orella is dissident. If someone is tsaristic and dissident then they are deciphered. Young people are tsaristic. If Lyda is tsaristic then Lyda is deciphered. Red people are rapt. Red, deciphered people are thickset. If someone is demotic then they are tsaristic. Lyda is demotic.", "logic": "\nDemotic(lyda)\nDripless(lyda)\nTsaristic(lyda)\nRapt(lyda)\nDissident(lyda)\nDripless(orella)\nDissident(orella)\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and Dissident(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Dissident(x) -> Tsaristic(x))\nTsaristic(lyda) -> Deciphered(lyda)\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Rapt(x))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and Deciphered(x) -> Thickset(x))\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Tsaristic(x))\n\nDemotic(lyda)\n\ntherefore Demotic(lyda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Lyndsay is hydrous. Lyndsay is undamaged. Lyndsay is backless. Lyndsay is held. Lyndsay is agape. Edi is undamaged. Edi is agape. If someone is backless and agape then they are akin. Young people are backless. If Lyndsay is backless then Lyndsay is akin. Red people are held. Red, akin people are costless. If someone is hydrous then they are backless. Lyndsay is not undamaged.", "logic": "\nHydrous(lyndsay)\nUndamaged(lyndsay)\nBackless(lyndsay)\nHeld(lyndsay)\nAgape(lyndsay)\nUndamaged(edi)\nAgape(edi)\nforall x (Backless(x) and Agape(x) -> Akin(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Backless(x))\nBackless(lyndsay) -> Akin(lyndsay)\nforall x (Backless(x) -> Held(x))\nforall x (Backless(x) and Akin(x) -> Costless(x))\nforall x (Hydrous(x) -> Backless(x))\n\nnot Undamaged(lyndsay)\n\ntherefore Undamaged(lyndsay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Agamemnon is piscatory. Agamemnon is tertiary. Agamemnon is paltry. Agamemnon is impassive. Agamemnon is drowsy. Ellissa is tertiary. Ellissa is drowsy. If someone is paltry and drowsy then they are unblinking. Young people are paltry. If Agamemnon is paltry then Agamemnon is unblinking. Red people are impassive. Red, unblinking people are unsoured. If someone is piscatory then they are paltry. Agamemnon is unblinking.", "logic": "\nPiscatory(agamemnon)\nTertiary(agamemnon)\nPaltry(agamemnon)\nImpassive(agamemnon)\nDrowsy(agamemnon)\nTertiary(ellissa)\nDrowsy(ellissa)\nforall x (Paltry(x) and Drowsy(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) -> Paltry(x))\nPaltry(agamemnon) -> Unblinking(agamemnon)\nforall x (Paltry(x) -> Impassive(x))\nforall x (Paltry(x) and Unblinking(x) -> Unsoured(x))\nforall x (Piscatory(x) -> Paltry(x))\n\nUnblinking(agamemnon)\n\nPaltry(agamemnon) and Paltry(agamemnon) -> Unblinking(agamemnon) -> therefore Unblinking(agamemnon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Flory is keyless. Flory is formed. Flory is puritanic. Flory is apothecial. Flory is bathyal. Darius is formed. Darius is bathyal. If someone is puritanic and bathyal then they are unsheathed. Young people are puritanic. If Flory is puritanic then Flory is unsheathed. Red people are apothecial. Red, unsheathed people are brainish. If someone is keyless then they are puritanic. Flory is not unsheathed.", "logic": "\nKeyless(flory)\nFormed(flory)\nPuritanic(flory)\nApothecial(flory)\nBathyal(flory)\nFormed(darius)\nBathyal(darius)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) and Bathyal(x) -> Unsheathed(x))\nforall x (Bathyal(x) -> Puritanic(x))\nPuritanic(flory) -> Unsheathed(flory)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) -> Apothecial(x))\nforall x (Puritanic(x) and Unsheathed(x) -> Brainish(x))\nforall x (Keyless(x) -> Puritanic(x))\n\nnot Unsheathed(flory)\n\nPuritanic(flory) and Puritanic(flory) -> Unsheathed(flory) -> therefore Unsheathed(flory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Haskell is downfield. Haskell is barreled. Haskell is uncleanly. Haskell is diurnal. Haskell is spiked. Elyse is barreled. Elyse is spiked. If someone is uncleanly and spiked then they are aguish. Young people are uncleanly. If Haskell is uncleanly then Haskell is aguish. Red people are diurnal. Red, aguish people are auroral. If someone is downfield then they are uncleanly. Elyse is aguish.", "logic": "\nDownfield(haskell)\nBarreled(haskell)\nUncleanly(haskell)\nDiurnal(haskell)\nSpiked(haskell)\nBarreled(elyse)\nSpiked(elyse)\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) and Spiked(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Spiked(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\nUncleanly(haskell) -> Aguish(haskell)\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) -> Diurnal(x))\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) and Aguish(x) -> Auroral(x))\nforall x (Downfield(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\n\nAguish(elyse)\n\nSpiked(elyse) and forall x (Spiked(x) -> Uncleanly(x)) -> therefore Uncleanly(elyse) Uncleanly(elyse) and Spiked(elyse) and forall x (Uncleanly(x) and Spiked(x) -> Aguish(x)) -> therefore Aguish(elyse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Theobald is grotesque. Theobald is delicate. Theobald is hereditary. Theobald is trillion. Theobald is cancellate. Milly is delicate. Milly is cancellate. If someone is hereditary and cancellate then they are foxy. Young people are hereditary. If Theobald is hereditary then Theobald is foxy. Red people are trillion. Red, foxy people are hypotonic. If someone is grotesque then they are hereditary. Milly is not trillion.", "logic": "\nGrotesque(theobald)\nDelicate(theobald)\nHereditary(theobald)\nTrillion(theobald)\nCancellate(theobald)\nDelicate(milly)\nCancellate(milly)\nforall x (Hereditary(x) and Cancellate(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Cancellate(x) -> Hereditary(x))\nHereditary(theobald) -> Foxy(theobald)\nforall x (Hereditary(x) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Hereditary(x) and Foxy(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Grotesque(x) -> Hereditary(x))\n\nnot Trillion(milly)\n\nCancellate(milly) and forall x (Cancellate(x) -> Hereditary(x)) -> therefore Hereditary(milly) Hereditary(milly) and forall x (Hereditary(x) -> Trillion(x)) -> therefore Trillion(milly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Iain is rubicund. Iain is faveolate. Iain is underway. Iain is inscribed. Iain is unbacked. Helena is faveolate. Helena is unbacked. If someone is underway and unbacked then they are dominant. Young people are underway. If Iain is underway then Iain is dominant. Red people are inscribed. Red, dominant people are gaunt. If someone is rubicund then they are underway. Helena is gaunt.", "logic": "\nRubicund(iain)\nFaveolate(iain)\nUnderway(iain)\nInscribed(iain)\nUnbacked(iain)\nFaveolate(helena)\nUnbacked(helena)\nforall x (Underway(x) and Unbacked(x) -> Dominant(x))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) -> Underway(x))\nUnderway(iain) -> Dominant(iain)\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Inscribed(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) and Dominant(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) -> Underway(x))\n\nGaunt(helena)\n\nUnbacked(helena) and forall x (Unbacked(x) -> Underway(x)) -> therefore Underway(helena) Unbacked(helena) and forall x (Unbacked(x) -> Underway(x)) -> therefore Underway(helena) Underway(helena) and Unbacked(helena) and forall x (Underway(x) and Unbacked(x) -> Dominant(x)) -> therefore Dominant(helena) Underway(helena) and Dominant(helena) and forall x (Underway(x) and Dominant(x) -> Gaunt(x)) -> therefore Gaunt(helena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "Jennee is bastioned. Jennee is galling. Jennee is healthier. Jennee is overaged. Jennee is dented. Napoleon is galling. Napoleon is dented. If someone is healthier and dented then they are afeared. Young people are healthier. If Jennee is healthier then Jennee is afeared. Red people are overaged. Red, afeared people are arable. If someone is bastioned then they are healthier. Napoleon is not arable.", "logic": "\nBastioned(jennee)\nGalling(jennee)\nHealthier(jennee)\nOveraged(jennee)\nDented(jennee)\nGalling(napoleon)\nDented(napoleon)\nforall x (Healthier(x) and Dented(x) -> Afeared(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Healthier(x))\nHealthier(jennee) -> Afeared(jennee)\nforall x (Healthier(x) -> Overaged(x))\nforall x (Healthier(x) and Afeared(x) -> Arable(x))\nforall x (Bastioned(x) -> Healthier(x))\n\nnot Arable(napoleon)\n\nDented(napoleon) and forall x (Dented(x) -> Healthier(x)) -> therefore Healthier(napoleon) Dented(napoleon) and forall x (Dented(x) -> Healthier(x)) -> therefore Healthier(napoleon) Healthier(napoleon) and Dented(napoleon) and forall x (Healthier(x) and Dented(x) -> Afeared(x)) -> therefore Afeared(napoleon) Healthier(napoleon) and Afeared(napoleon) and forall x (Healthier(x) and Afeared(x) -> Arable(x)) -> therefore Arable(napoleon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1655"} {"premises": "The shani is profitless. The shani is rawboned. The shani is impenitent. The shani is multilevel. The shani is cankerous. If someone is rawboned then they are cankerous. If someone is rawboned and impenitent then they are cankerous. All impenitent people are profitless. The shani is impenitent.", "logic": "\nProfitless(shani)\nRawboned(shani)\nImpenitent(shani)\nMultilevel(shani)\nCankerous(shani)\nforall x (Rawboned(x) -> Cankerous(x))\nforall x (Rawboned(x) and Impenitent(x) -> Cankerous(x))\nforall x (Impenitent(x) -> Profitless(x))\n\nImpenitent(shani)\n\ntherefore Impenitent(shani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2344"} {"premises": "The mady is unsuitable. The mady is awheel. The mady is semiannual. The mady is redolent. The mady is disturbing. If someone is awheel then they are disturbing. If someone is awheel and semiannual then they are disturbing. All semiannual people are unsuitable. The mady is not unsuitable.", "logic": "\nUnsuitable(mady)\nAwheel(mady)\nSemiannual(mady)\nRedolent(mady)\nDisturbing(mady)\nforall x (Awheel(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Awheel(x) and Semiannual(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Semiannual(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\n\nnot Unsuitable(mady)\n\ntherefore Unsuitable(mady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2344"} {"premises": "The bengt is alvine. The bengt is diffused. The bengt is multiplex. The bengt is assiduous. The bengt is amebous. If someone is diffused then they are amebous. If someone is diffused and multiplex then they are amebous. All multiplex people are alvine. The bengt does not visit the bengt.", "logic": "\nAlvine(bengt)\nDiffused(bengt)\nMultiplex(bengt)\nAssiduous(bengt)\nAmebous(bengt)\nforall x (Diffused(x) -> Amebous(x))\nforall x (Diffused(x) and Multiplex(x) -> Amebous(x))\nforall x (Multiplex(x) -> Alvine(x))\n\nnot Visits(bengt, bengt)\n\nnot Visits(bengt, bengt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2344"} {"premises": "The spense is ungulated. The spense is unrentable. The spense is bumpy. The spense is scrub. The spense is prudential. If someone is unrentable then they are prudential. If someone is unrentable and bumpy then they are prudential. All bumpy people are ungulated. The spense eats the spense.", "logic": "\nUngulated(spense)\nUnrentable(spense)\nBumpy(spense)\nScrub(spense)\nPrudential(spense)\nforall x (Unrentable(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Unrentable(x) and Bumpy(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Bumpy(x) -> Ungulated(x))\n\nEats(spense, spense)\n\nEats(spense, spense) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2344"} {"premises": "The phillida is precatory. The octavius nudge the raven. The raven copper the phillida. If something nudge the octavius then the octavius copper the raven. If something maltreat the phillida and it copper the phillida then the phillida copper the octavius. If the octavius copper the phillida and the octavius nudge the phillida then the octavius maltreat the raven. If something is impolite then it copper the phillida. If something is tormented then it maltreat the octavius. If something nudge the raven then it is tormented. Young things are impolite. If something copper the raven then the raven copper the phillida. The octavius nudge the raven.", "logic": "\nPrecatory(phillida)\nNudge(octavius, raven)\nCopper(raven, phillida)\nforall x (Nudge(x, octavius) -> Copper(octavius, raven))\nforall x (Maltreat(x, phillida) and Copper(x, phillida) -> Copper(phillida, octavius))\nCopper(octavius, phillida) and Nudge(octavius, phillida) -> Maltreat(octavius, raven)\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Copper(x, phillida))\nforall x (Tormented(x) -> Maltreat(x, octavius))\nforall x (Nudge(x, raven) -> Tormented(x))\nforall x (Tormented(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Copper(x, raven) -> Copper(raven, phillida))\n\nNudge(octavius, raven)\n\ntherefore Nudge(octavius, raven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The suzetta is eellike. The niki lube the omar. The omar vulgarize the suzetta. If something lube the niki then the niki vulgarize the omar. If something trespass the suzetta and it vulgarize the suzetta then the suzetta vulgarize the niki. If the niki vulgarize the suzetta and the niki lube the suzetta then the niki trespass the omar. If something is tricky then it vulgarize the suzetta. If something is partible then it trespass the niki. If something lube the omar then it is partible. Young things are tricky. If something vulgarize the omar then the omar vulgarize the suzetta. The niki does not eat the omar.", "logic": "\nEellike(suzetta)\nLube(niki, omar)\nVulgarize(omar, suzetta)\nforall x (Lube(x, niki) -> Vulgarize(niki, omar))\nforall x (Trespass(x, suzetta) and Vulgarize(x, suzetta) -> Vulgarize(suzetta, niki))\nVulgarize(niki, suzetta) and Lube(niki, suzetta) -> Trespass(niki, omar)\nforall x (Tricky(x) -> Vulgarize(x, suzetta))\nforall x (Partible(x) -> Trespass(x, niki))\nforall x (Lube(x, omar) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Partible(x) -> Tricky(x))\nforall x (Vulgarize(x, omar) -> Vulgarize(omar, suzetta))\n\nnot Lube(niki, omar)\n\ntherefore Lube(niki, omar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The evelina is wary. The ferne pocket the hannis. The hannis nick the evelina. If something pocket the ferne then the ferne nick the hannis. If something eternize the evelina and it nick the evelina then the evelina nick the ferne. If the ferne nick the evelina and the ferne pocket the evelina then the ferne eternize the hannis. If something is scholastic then it nick the evelina. If something is unseen then it eternize the ferne. If something pocket the hannis then it is unseen. Young things are scholastic. If something nick the hannis then the hannis nick the evelina. The ferne is unseen.", "logic": "\nWary(evelina)\nPocket(ferne, hannis)\nNick(hannis, evelina)\nforall x (Pocket(x, ferne) -> Nick(ferne, hannis))\nforall x (Eternize(x, evelina) and Nick(x, evelina) -> Nick(evelina, ferne))\nNick(ferne, evelina) and Pocket(ferne, evelina) -> Eternize(ferne, hannis)\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Nick(x, evelina))\nforall x (Unseen(x) -> Eternize(x, ferne))\nforall x (Pocket(x, hannis) -> Unseen(x))\nforall x (Unseen(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Nick(x, hannis) -> Nick(hannis, evelina))\n\nUnseen(ferne)\n\nPocket(ferne, hannis) and forall x (Pocket(x, hannis) -> Unseen(x)) -> therefore Unseen(ferne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The geri is drupaceous. The belvia digitalize the tailor. The tailor humor the geri. If something digitalize the belvia then the belvia humor the tailor. If something lubricate the geri and it humor the geri then the geri humor the belvia. If the belvia humor the geri and the belvia digitalize the geri then the belvia lubricate the tailor. If something is lossless then it humor the geri. If something is curvey then it lubricate the belvia. If something digitalize the tailor then it is curvey. Young things are lossless. If something humor the tailor then the tailor humor the geri. The belvia is not curvey.", "logic": "\nDrupaceous(geri)\nDigitalize(belvia, tailor)\nHumor(tailor, geri)\nforall x (Digitalize(x, belvia) -> Humor(belvia, tailor))\nforall x (Lubricate(x, geri) and Humor(x, geri) -> Humor(geri, belvia))\nHumor(belvia, geri) and Digitalize(belvia, geri) -> Lubricate(belvia, tailor)\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Humor(x, geri))\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Lubricate(x, belvia))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, tailor) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Humor(x, tailor) -> Humor(tailor, geri))\n\nnot Curvey(belvia)\n\nDigitalize(belvia, tailor) and forall x (Digitalize(x, tailor) -> Curvey(x)) -> therefore Curvey(belvia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The appolonia is scheduled. The leena omit the robinia. The robinia lash the appolonia. If something omit the leena then the leena lash the robinia. If something ptyalize the appolonia and it lash the appolonia then the appolonia lash the leena. If the leena lash the appolonia and the leena omit the appolonia then the leena ptyalize the robinia. If something is catabatic then it lash the appolonia. If something is transonic then it ptyalize the leena. If something omit the robinia then it is transonic. Young things are catabatic. If something lash the robinia then the robinia lash the appolonia. The leena is catabatic.", "logic": "\nScheduled(appolonia)\nOmit(leena, robinia)\nLash(robinia, appolonia)\nforall x (Omit(x, leena) -> Lash(leena, robinia))\nforall x (Ptyalize(x, appolonia) and Lash(x, appolonia) -> Lash(appolonia, leena))\nLash(leena, appolonia) and Omit(leena, appolonia) -> Ptyalize(leena, robinia)\nforall x (Catabatic(x) -> Lash(x, appolonia))\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Ptyalize(x, leena))\nforall x (Omit(x, robinia) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nforall x (Lash(x, robinia) -> Lash(robinia, appolonia))\n\nCatabatic(leena)\n\nOmit(leena, robinia) and forall x (Omit(x, robinia) -> Transonic(x)) -> therefore Transonic(leena) Transonic(leena) and forall x (Transonic(x) -> Catabatic(x)) -> therefore Catabatic(leena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The chester is blushful. The flipper repent the erasmus. The erasmus immix the chester. If something repent the flipper then the flipper immix the erasmus. If something rigidify the chester and it immix the chester then the chester immix the flipper. If the flipper immix the chester and the flipper repent the chester then the flipper rigidify the erasmus. If something is napped then it immix the chester. If something is guided then it rigidify the flipper. If something repent the erasmus then it is guided. Young things are napped. If something immix the erasmus then the erasmus immix the chester. The flipper is not napped.", "logic": "\nBlushful(chester)\nRepent(flipper, erasmus)\nImmix(erasmus, chester)\nforall x (Repent(x, flipper) -> Immix(flipper, erasmus))\nforall x (Rigidify(x, chester) and Immix(x, chester) -> Immix(chester, flipper))\nImmix(flipper, chester) and Repent(flipper, chester) -> Rigidify(flipper, erasmus)\nforall x (Napped(x) -> Immix(x, chester))\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Rigidify(x, flipper))\nforall x (Repent(x, erasmus) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Napped(x))\nforall x (Immix(x, erasmus) -> Immix(erasmus, chester))\n\nnot Napped(flipper)\n\nRepent(flipper, erasmus) and forall x (Repent(x, erasmus) -> Guided(x)) -> therefore Guided(flipper) Guided(flipper) and forall x (Guided(x) -> Napped(x)) -> therefore Napped(flipper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The aldwin is static. The liora denature the basia. The basia support the aldwin. If something denature the liora then the liora support the basia. If something henna the aldwin and it support the aldwin then the aldwin support the liora. If the liora support the aldwin and the liora denature the aldwin then the liora henna the basia. If something is algonquin then it support the aldwin. If something is urethral then it henna the liora. If something denature the basia then it is urethral. Young things are algonquin. If something support the basia then the basia support the aldwin. The liora support the aldwin.", "logic": "\nStatic(aldwin)\nDenature(liora, basia)\nSupport(basia, aldwin)\nforall x (Denature(x, liora) -> Support(liora, basia))\nforall x (Henna(x, aldwin) and Support(x, aldwin) -> Support(aldwin, liora))\nSupport(liora, aldwin) and Denature(liora, aldwin) -> Henna(liora, basia)\nforall x (Algonquin(x) -> Support(x, aldwin))\nforall x (Urethral(x) -> Henna(x, liora))\nforall x (Denature(x, basia) -> Urethral(x))\nforall x (Urethral(x) -> Algonquin(x))\nforall x (Support(x, basia) -> Support(basia, aldwin))\n\nSupport(liora, aldwin)\n\nDenature(liora, basia) and forall x (Denature(x, basia) -> Urethral(x)) -> therefore Urethral(liora) Urethral(liora) and forall x (Urethral(x) -> Algonquin(x)) -> therefore Algonquin(liora) Algonquin(liora) and forall x (Algonquin(x) -> Support(x, aldwin)) -> therefore Support(liora, aldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The lia is dying. The valina environ the micheline. The micheline rehear the lia. If something environ the valina then the valina rehear the micheline. If something pervade the lia and it rehear the lia then the lia rehear the valina. If the valina rehear the lia and the valina environ the lia then the valina pervade the micheline. If something is pilar then it rehear the lia. If something is uttered then it pervade the valina. If something environ the micheline then it is uttered. Young things are pilar. If something rehear the micheline then the micheline rehear the lia. The valina does not chase the lia.", "logic": "\nDying(lia)\nEnviron(valina, micheline)\nRehear(micheline, lia)\nforall x (Environ(x, valina) -> Rehear(valina, micheline))\nforall x (Pervade(x, lia) and Rehear(x, lia) -> Rehear(lia, valina))\nRehear(valina, lia) and Environ(valina, lia) -> Pervade(valina, micheline)\nforall x (Pilar(x) -> Rehear(x, lia))\nforall x (Uttered(x) -> Pervade(x, valina))\nforall x (Environ(x, micheline) -> Uttered(x))\nforall x (Uttered(x) -> Pilar(x))\nforall x (Rehear(x, micheline) -> Rehear(micheline, lia))\n\nnot Rehear(valina, lia)\n\nEnviron(valina, micheline) and forall x (Environ(x, micheline) -> Uttered(x)) -> therefore Uttered(valina) Uttered(valina) and forall x (Uttered(x) -> Pilar(x)) -> therefore Pilar(valina) Pilar(valina) and forall x (Pilar(x) -> Rehear(x, lia)) -> therefore Rehear(valina, lia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The yolane is disfigured. The chester objurgate the florie. The florie smack the yolane. If something objurgate the chester then the chester smack the florie. If something swat the yolane and it smack the yolane then the yolane smack the chester. If the chester smack the yolane and the chester objurgate the yolane then the chester swat the florie. If something is cavalier then it smack the yolane. If something is homozygous then it swat the chester. If something objurgate the florie then it is homozygous. Young things are cavalier. If something smack the florie then the florie smack the yolane. The yolane does not chase the yolane.", "logic": "\nDisfigured(yolane)\nObjurgate(chester, florie)\nSmack(florie, yolane)\nforall x (Objurgate(x, chester) -> Smack(chester, florie))\nforall x (Swat(x, yolane) and Smack(x, yolane) -> Smack(yolane, chester))\nSmack(chester, yolane) and Objurgate(chester, yolane) -> Swat(chester, florie)\nforall x (Cavalier(x) -> Smack(x, yolane))\nforall x (Homozygous(x) -> Swat(x, chester))\nforall x (Objurgate(x, florie) -> Homozygous(x))\nforall x (Homozygous(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Smack(x, florie) -> Smack(florie, yolane))\n\nnot Smack(yolane, yolane)\n\nforall x (Cavalier(x) -> Smack(x, yolane)) <- forall x (Homozygous(x) -> Cavalier(x)) <- forall x (Objurgate(x, florie) -> Homozygous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The melli is chiasmatic. The greer adulate the filmore. The filmore shunt the melli. If something adulate the greer then the greer shunt the filmore. If something portion the melli and it shunt the melli then the melli shunt the greer. If the greer shunt the melli and the greer adulate the melli then the greer portion the filmore. If something is pickled then it shunt the melli. If something is damning then it portion the greer. If something adulate the filmore then it is damning. Young things are pickled. If something shunt the filmore then the filmore shunt the melli. The filmore is pickled.", "logic": "\nChiasmatic(melli)\nAdulate(greer, filmore)\nShunt(filmore, melli)\nforall x (Adulate(x, greer) -> Shunt(greer, filmore))\nforall x (Portion(x, melli) and Shunt(x, melli) -> Shunt(melli, greer))\nShunt(greer, melli) and Adulate(greer, melli) -> Portion(greer, filmore)\nforall x (Pickled(x) -> Shunt(x, melli))\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Portion(x, greer))\nforall x (Adulate(x, filmore) -> Damning(x))\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Pickled(x))\nforall x (Shunt(x, filmore) -> Shunt(filmore, melli))\n\nPickled(filmore)\n\nforall x (Damning(x) -> Pickled(x)) <- forall x (Adulate(x, filmore) -> Damning(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The mirabelle is oligarchic. The mechelle frequent the rice. The rice pair the mirabelle. If something frequent the mechelle then the mechelle pair the rice. If something cower the mirabelle and it pair the mirabelle then the mirabelle pair the mechelle. If the mechelle pair the mirabelle and the mechelle frequent the mirabelle then the mechelle cower the rice. If something is underived then it pair the mirabelle. If something is peripheral then it cower the mechelle. If something frequent the rice then it is peripheral. Young things are underived. If something pair the rice then the rice pair the mirabelle. The mirabelle is not peripheral.", "logic": "\nOligarchic(mirabelle)\nFrequent(mechelle, rice)\nPair(rice, mirabelle)\nforall x (Frequent(x, mechelle) -> Pair(mechelle, rice))\nforall x (Cower(x, mirabelle) and Pair(x, mirabelle) -> Pair(mirabelle, mechelle))\nPair(mechelle, mirabelle) and Frequent(mechelle, mirabelle) -> Cower(mechelle, rice)\nforall x (Underived(x) -> Pair(x, mirabelle))\nforall x (Peripheral(x) -> Cower(x, mechelle))\nforall x (Frequent(x, rice) -> Peripheral(x))\nforall x (Peripheral(x) -> Underived(x))\nforall x (Pair(x, rice) -> Pair(rice, mirabelle))\n\nnot Peripheral(mirabelle)\n\nforall x (Frequent(x, rice) -> Peripheral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The desdemona is cyprian. The gelya munch the shawna. The shawna hoist the desdemona. If something munch the gelya then the gelya hoist the shawna. If something severalise the desdemona and it hoist the desdemona then the desdemona hoist the gelya. If the gelya hoist the desdemona and the gelya munch the desdemona then the gelya severalise the shawna. If something is palladian then it hoist the desdemona. If something is waggish then it severalise the gelya. If something munch the shawna then it is waggish. Young things are palladian. If something hoist the shawna then the shawna hoist the desdemona. The desdemona severalise the gelya.", "logic": "\nCyprian(desdemona)\nMunch(gelya, shawna)\nHoist(shawna, desdemona)\nforall x (Munch(x, gelya) -> Hoist(gelya, shawna))\nforall x (Severalise(x, desdemona) and Hoist(x, desdemona) -> Hoist(desdemona, gelya))\nHoist(gelya, desdemona) and Munch(gelya, desdemona) -> Severalise(gelya, shawna)\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Hoist(x, desdemona))\nforall x (Waggish(x) -> Severalise(x, gelya))\nforall x (Munch(x, shawna) -> Waggish(x))\nforall x (Waggish(x) -> Palladian(x))\nforall x (Hoist(x, shawna) -> Hoist(shawna, desdemona))\n\nSeveralise(desdemona, gelya)\n\nforall x (Waggish(x) -> Severalise(x, gelya)) <- forall x (Munch(x, shawna) -> Waggish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The vannie is clubbable. The amara stack the lilllie. The lilllie anathemize the vannie. If something stack the amara then the amara anathemize the lilllie. If something resurface the vannie and it anathemize the vannie then the vannie anathemize the amara. If the amara anathemize the vannie and the amara stack the vannie then the amara resurface the lilllie. If something is trusted then it anathemize the vannie. If something is biggish then it resurface the amara. If something stack the lilllie then it is biggish. Young things are trusted. If something anathemize the lilllie then the lilllie anathemize the vannie. The lilllie does not eat the lilllie.", "logic": "\nClubbable(vannie)\nStack(amara, lilllie)\nAnathemize(lilllie, vannie)\nforall x (Stack(x, amara) -> Anathemize(amara, lilllie))\nforall x (Resurface(x, vannie) and Anathemize(x, vannie) -> Anathemize(vannie, amara))\nAnathemize(amara, vannie) and Stack(amara, vannie) -> Resurface(amara, lilllie)\nforall x (Trusted(x) -> Anathemize(x, vannie))\nforall x (Biggish(x) -> Resurface(x, amara))\nforall x (Stack(x, lilllie) -> Biggish(x))\nforall x (Biggish(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, lilllie) -> Anathemize(lilllie, vannie))\n\nnot Stack(lilllie, lilllie)\n\nnot Stack(lilllie, lilllie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The lorie is witting. The toni luxate the kristina. The kristina lighter the lorie. If something luxate the toni then the toni lighter the kristina. If something duplicate the lorie and it lighter the lorie then the lorie lighter the toni. If the toni lighter the lorie and the toni luxate the lorie then the toni duplicate the kristina. If something is scheming then it lighter the lorie. If something is undreamt then it duplicate the toni. If something luxate the kristina then it is undreamt. Young things are scheming. If something lighter the kristina then the kristina lighter the lorie. The lorie duplicate the kristina.", "logic": "\nWitting(lorie)\nLuxate(toni, kristina)\nLighter(kristina, lorie)\nforall x (Luxate(x, toni) -> Lighter(toni, kristina))\nforall x (Duplicate(x, lorie) and Lighter(x, lorie) -> Lighter(lorie, toni))\nLighter(toni, lorie) and Luxate(toni, lorie) -> Duplicate(toni, kristina)\nforall x (Scheming(x) -> Lighter(x, lorie))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Duplicate(x, toni))\nforall x (Luxate(x, kristina) -> Undreamt(x))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Scheming(x))\nforall x (Lighter(x, kristina) -> Lighter(kristina, lorie))\n\nDuplicate(lorie, kristina)\n\nDuplicate(lorie, kristina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The mela is utopian. The arlette ablactate the sammie. The sammie suffuse the mela. If something ablactate the arlette then the arlette suffuse the sammie. If something reconquer the mela and it suffuse the mela then the mela suffuse the arlette. If the arlette suffuse the mela and the arlette ablactate the mela then the arlette reconquer the sammie. If something is lewd then it suffuse the mela. If something is unsettled then it reconquer the arlette. If something ablactate the sammie then it is unsettled. Young things are lewd. If something suffuse the sammie then the sammie suffuse the mela. The arlette does not chase the arlette.", "logic": "\nUtopian(mela)\nAblactate(arlette, sammie)\nSuffuse(sammie, mela)\nforall x (Ablactate(x, arlette) -> Suffuse(arlette, sammie))\nforall x (Reconquer(x, mela) and Suffuse(x, mela) -> Suffuse(mela, arlette))\nSuffuse(arlette, mela) and Ablactate(arlette, mela) -> Reconquer(arlette, sammie)\nforall x (Lewd(x) -> Suffuse(x, mela))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) -> Reconquer(x, arlette))\nforall x (Ablactate(x, sammie) -> Unsettled(x))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) -> Lewd(x))\nforall x (Suffuse(x, sammie) -> Suffuse(sammie, mela))\n\nnot Suffuse(arlette, arlette)\n\nnot Suffuse(arlette, arlette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The desdemona is lunar. The kandy denudate the sharl. The sharl trademark the desdemona. If something denudate the kandy then the kandy trademark the sharl. If something pray the desdemona and it trademark the desdemona then the desdemona trademark the kandy. If the kandy trademark the desdemona and the kandy denudate the desdemona then the kandy pray the sharl. If something is motley then it trademark the desdemona. If something is variegated then it pray the kandy. If something denudate the sharl then it is variegated. Young things are motley. If something trademark the sharl then the sharl trademark the desdemona. The kandy denudate the kandy.", "logic": "\nLunar(desdemona)\nDenudate(kandy, sharl)\nTrademark(sharl, desdemona)\nforall x (Denudate(x, kandy) -> Trademark(kandy, sharl))\nforall x (Pray(x, desdemona) and Trademark(x, desdemona) -> Trademark(desdemona, kandy))\nTrademark(kandy, desdemona) and Denudate(kandy, desdemona) -> Pray(kandy, sharl)\nforall x (Motley(x) -> Trademark(x, desdemona))\nforall x (Variegated(x) -> Pray(x, kandy))\nforall x (Denudate(x, sharl) -> Variegated(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) -> Motley(x))\nforall x (Trademark(x, sharl) -> Trademark(sharl, desdemona))\n\nDenudate(kandy, kandy)\n\nDenudate(kandy, kandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Lizzy is thawed. Lizzy is prostate. Lizzy is chondritic. Marven is senatorial. Marven is unclaimed. Marven is thawed. Marven is prostate. Marven is encircled. Durante is senatorial. Durante is unclaimed. Durante is thawed. Durante is prostate. Durante is civilised. Durante is encircled. Durante is chondritic. All thawed, prostate things are civilised. If something is civilised then it is chondritic. If something is encircled and senatorial then it is prostate. If something is prostate then it is senatorial. All senatorial, prostate things are encircled. All unclaimed, chondritic things are thawed. All civilised things are thawed. If Lizzy is chondritic and Lizzy is encircled then Lizzy is unclaimed. Marven is encircled.", "logic": "\nThawed(lizzy)\nProstate(lizzy)\nChondritic(lizzy)\nSenatorial(marven)\nUnclaimed(marven)\nThawed(marven)\nProstate(marven)\nEncircled(marven)\nSenatorial(durante)\nUnclaimed(durante)\nThawed(durante)\nProstate(durante)\nCivilised(durante)\nEncircled(durante)\nChondritic(durante)\nforall x (Thawed(x) and Prostate(x) -> Civilised(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Chondritic(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) and Senatorial(x) -> Prostate(x))\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Senatorial(x) and Prostate(x) -> Encircled(x))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) and Chondritic(x) -> Thawed(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Thawed(x))\nChondritic(lizzy) and Encircled(lizzy) -> Unclaimed(lizzy)\n\nEncircled(marven)\n\ntherefore Encircled(marven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Trip is dishy. Trip is goddam. Trip is sacred. Adriana is deaf. Adriana is ennobling. Adriana is dishy. Adriana is goddam. Adriana is autologous. Shoshanna is deaf. Shoshanna is ennobling. Shoshanna is dishy. Shoshanna is goddam. Shoshanna is italian. Shoshanna is autologous. Shoshanna is sacred. All dishy, goddam things are italian. If something is italian then it is sacred. If something is autologous and deaf then it is goddam. If something is goddam then it is deaf. All deaf, goddam things are autologous. All ennobling, sacred things are dishy. All italian things are dishy. If Trip is sacred and Trip is autologous then Trip is ennobling. Adriana is not deaf.", "logic": "\nDishy(trip)\nGoddam(trip)\nSacred(trip)\nDeaf(adriana)\nEnnobling(adriana)\nDishy(adriana)\nGoddam(adriana)\nAutologous(adriana)\nDeaf(shoshanna)\nEnnobling(shoshanna)\nDishy(shoshanna)\nGoddam(shoshanna)\nItalian(shoshanna)\nAutologous(shoshanna)\nSacred(shoshanna)\nforall x (Dishy(x) and Goddam(x) -> Italian(x))\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Sacred(x))\nforall x (Autologous(x) and Deaf(x) -> Goddam(x))\nforall x (Goddam(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) and Goddam(x) -> Autologous(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) and Sacred(x) -> Dishy(x))\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Dishy(x))\nSacred(trip) and Autologous(trip) -> Ennobling(trip)\n\nnot Deaf(adriana)\n\ntherefore Deaf(adriana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Guenna is motive. Guenna is actuating. Guenna is wispy. Remington is fagged. Remington is bulky. Remington is motive. Remington is actuating. Remington is drumhead. Julee is fagged. Julee is bulky. Julee is motive. Julee is actuating. Julee is conic. Julee is drumhead. Julee is wispy. All motive, actuating things are conic. If something is conic then it is wispy. If something is drumhead and fagged then it is actuating. If something is actuating then it is fagged. All fagged, actuating things are drumhead. All bulky, wispy things are motive. All conic things are motive. If Guenna is wispy and Guenna is drumhead then Guenna is bulky. Guenna is conic.", "logic": "\nMotive(guenna)\nActuating(guenna)\nWispy(guenna)\nFagged(remington)\nBulky(remington)\nMotive(remington)\nActuating(remington)\nDrumhead(remington)\nFagged(julee)\nBulky(julee)\nMotive(julee)\nActuating(julee)\nConic(julee)\nDrumhead(julee)\nWispy(julee)\nforall x (Motive(x) and Actuating(x) -> Conic(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Wispy(x))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) and Fagged(x) -> Actuating(x))\nforall x (Actuating(x) -> Fagged(x))\nforall x (Fagged(x) and Actuating(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nforall x (Bulky(x) and Wispy(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Conic(x) -> Motive(x))\nWispy(guenna) and Drumhead(guenna) -> Bulky(guenna)\n\nConic(guenna)\n\nMotive(guenna) and Actuating(guenna) and forall x (Motive(x) and Actuating(x) -> Conic(x)) -> therefore Conic(guenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Pattie is aweless. Pattie is blowy. Pattie is adipose. Vallie is divinatory. Vallie is ascendible. Vallie is aweless. Vallie is blowy. Vallie is ahorseback. Eileen is divinatory. Eileen is ascendible. Eileen is aweless. Eileen is blowy. Eileen is initiative. Eileen is ahorseback. Eileen is adipose. All aweless, blowy things are initiative. If something is initiative then it is adipose. If something is ahorseback and divinatory then it is blowy. If something is blowy then it is divinatory. All divinatory, blowy things are ahorseback. All ascendible, adipose things are aweless. All initiative things are aweless. If Pattie is adipose and Pattie is ahorseback then Pattie is ascendible. Pattie is not initiative.", "logic": "\nAweless(pattie)\nBlowy(pattie)\nAdipose(pattie)\nDivinatory(vallie)\nAscendible(vallie)\nAweless(vallie)\nBlowy(vallie)\nAhorseback(vallie)\nDivinatory(eileen)\nAscendible(eileen)\nAweless(eileen)\nBlowy(eileen)\nInitiative(eileen)\nAhorseback(eileen)\nAdipose(eileen)\nforall x (Aweless(x) and Blowy(x) -> Initiative(x))\nforall x (Initiative(x) -> Adipose(x))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) and Divinatory(x) -> Blowy(x))\nforall x (Blowy(x) -> Divinatory(x))\nforall x (Divinatory(x) and Blowy(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) and Adipose(x) -> Aweless(x))\nforall x (Initiative(x) -> Aweless(x))\nAdipose(pattie) and Ahorseback(pattie) -> Ascendible(pattie)\n\nnot Initiative(pattie)\n\nAweless(pattie) and Blowy(pattie) and forall x (Aweless(x) and Blowy(x) -> Initiative(x)) -> therefore Initiative(pattie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Mellie is swaggering. Mellie is reassuring. Mellie is delineated. Jacques is rightful. Jacques is japanese. Jacques is swaggering. Jacques is reassuring. Jacques is apiarian. Michaela is rightful. Michaela is japanese. Michaela is swaggering. Michaela is reassuring. Michaela is intrinsic. Michaela is apiarian. Michaela is delineated. All swaggering, reassuring things are intrinsic. If something is intrinsic then it is delineated. If something is apiarian and rightful then it is reassuring. If something is reassuring then it is rightful. All rightful, reassuring things are apiarian. All japanese, delineated things are swaggering. All intrinsic things are swaggering. If Mellie is delineated and Mellie is apiarian then Mellie is japanese. Mellie is apiarian.", "logic": "\nSwaggering(mellie)\nReassuring(mellie)\nDelineated(mellie)\nRightful(jacques)\nJapanese(jacques)\nSwaggering(jacques)\nReassuring(jacques)\nApiarian(jacques)\nRightful(michaela)\nJapanese(michaela)\nSwaggering(michaela)\nReassuring(michaela)\nIntrinsic(michaela)\nApiarian(michaela)\nDelineated(michaela)\nforall x (Swaggering(x) and Reassuring(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Delineated(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) and Rightful(x) -> Reassuring(x))\nforall x (Reassuring(x) -> Rightful(x))\nforall x (Rightful(x) and Reassuring(x) -> Apiarian(x))\nforall x (Japanese(x) and Delineated(x) -> Swaggering(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Swaggering(x))\nDelineated(mellie) and Apiarian(mellie) -> Japanese(mellie)\n\nApiarian(mellie)\n\nReassuring(mellie) and forall x (Reassuring(x) -> Rightful(x)) -> therefore Rightful(mellie) Rightful(mellie) and Reassuring(mellie) and forall x (Rightful(x) and Reassuring(x) -> Apiarian(x)) -> therefore Apiarian(mellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Jenifer is canescent. Jenifer is innovative. Jenifer is foiled. Celinda is unuttered. Celinda is jungian. Celinda is canescent. Celinda is innovative. Celinda is lxxxvii. Carline is unuttered. Carline is jungian. Carline is canescent. Carline is innovative. Carline is enabling. Carline is lxxxvii. Carline is foiled. All canescent, innovative things are enabling. If something is enabling then it is foiled. If something is lxxxvii and unuttered then it is innovative. If something is innovative then it is unuttered. All unuttered, innovative things are lxxxvii. All jungian, foiled things are canescent. All enabling things are canescent. If Jenifer is foiled and Jenifer is lxxxvii then Jenifer is jungian. Jenifer is not lxxxvii.", "logic": "\nCanescent(jenifer)\nInnovative(jenifer)\nFoiled(jenifer)\nUnuttered(celinda)\nJungian(celinda)\nCanescent(celinda)\nInnovative(celinda)\nLxxxvii(celinda)\nUnuttered(carline)\nJungian(carline)\nCanescent(carline)\nInnovative(carline)\nEnabling(carline)\nLxxxvii(carline)\nFoiled(carline)\nforall x (Canescent(x) and Innovative(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Enabling(x) -> Foiled(x))\nforall x (Lxxxvii(x) and Unuttered(x) -> Innovative(x))\nforall x (Innovative(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Unuttered(x) and Innovative(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Jungian(x) and Foiled(x) -> Canescent(x))\nforall x (Enabling(x) -> Canescent(x))\nFoiled(jenifer) and Lxxxvii(jenifer) -> Jungian(jenifer)\n\nnot Lxxxvii(jenifer)\n\nInnovative(jenifer) and forall x (Innovative(x) -> Unuttered(x)) -> therefore Unuttered(jenifer) Unuttered(jenifer) and Innovative(jenifer) and forall x (Unuttered(x) and Innovative(x) -> Lxxxvii(x)) -> therefore Lxxxvii(jenifer)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Eleanor is unshared. Eleanor is buttressed. Eleanor is agnatic. Sharla is curvey. Sharla is tapering. Sharla is unshared. Sharla is buttressed. Sharla is shelflike. Gwennie is curvey. Gwennie is tapering. Gwennie is unshared. Gwennie is buttressed. Gwennie is macaronic. Gwennie is shelflike. Gwennie is agnatic. All unshared, buttressed things are macaronic. If something is macaronic then it is agnatic. If something is shelflike and curvey then it is buttressed. If something is buttressed then it is curvey. All curvey, buttressed things are shelflike. All tapering, agnatic things are unshared. All macaronic things are unshared. If Eleanor is agnatic and Eleanor is shelflike then Eleanor is tapering. Eleanor is tapering.", "logic": "\nUnshared(eleanor)\nButtressed(eleanor)\nAgnatic(eleanor)\nCurvey(sharla)\nTapering(sharla)\nUnshared(sharla)\nButtressed(sharla)\nShelflike(sharla)\nCurvey(gwennie)\nTapering(gwennie)\nUnshared(gwennie)\nButtressed(gwennie)\nMacaronic(gwennie)\nShelflike(gwennie)\nAgnatic(gwennie)\nforall x (Unshared(x) and Buttressed(x) -> Macaronic(x))\nforall x (Macaronic(x) -> Agnatic(x))\nforall x (Shelflike(x) and Curvey(x) -> Buttressed(x))\nforall x (Buttressed(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) and Buttressed(x) -> Shelflike(x))\nforall x (Tapering(x) and Agnatic(x) -> Unshared(x))\nforall x (Macaronic(x) -> Unshared(x))\nAgnatic(eleanor) and Shelflike(eleanor) -> Tapering(eleanor)\n\nTapering(eleanor)\n\nButtressed(eleanor) and forall x (Buttressed(x) -> Curvey(x)) -> therefore Curvey(eleanor) Curvey(eleanor) and Buttressed(eleanor) and forall x (Curvey(x) and Buttressed(x) -> Shelflike(x)) -> therefore Shelflike(eleanor) Agnatic(eleanor) and Shelflike(eleanor) and Agnatic(eleanor) and Shelflike(eleanor) -> Tapering(eleanor) -> therefore Tapering(eleanor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "Lester is concave. Lester is dashed. Lester is unrevised. Ardith is dishy. Ardith is mangled. Ardith is concave. Ardith is dashed. Ardith is unseeable. Perl is dishy. Perl is mangled. Perl is concave. Perl is dashed. Perl is mancunian. Perl is unseeable. Perl is unrevised. All concave, dashed things are mancunian. If something is mancunian then it is unrevised. If something is unseeable and dishy then it is dashed. If something is dashed then it is dishy. All dishy, dashed things are unseeable. All mangled, unrevised things are concave. All mancunian things are concave. If Lester is unrevised and Lester is unseeable then Lester is mangled. Lester is not mangled.", "logic": "\nConcave(lester)\nDashed(lester)\nUnrevised(lester)\nDishy(ardith)\nMangled(ardith)\nConcave(ardith)\nDashed(ardith)\nUnseeable(ardith)\nDishy(perl)\nMangled(perl)\nConcave(perl)\nDashed(perl)\nMancunian(perl)\nUnseeable(perl)\nUnrevised(perl)\nforall x (Concave(x) and Dashed(x) -> Mancunian(x))\nforall x (Mancunian(x) -> Unrevised(x))\nforall x (Unseeable(x) and Dishy(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) -> Dishy(x))\nforall x (Dishy(x) and Dashed(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Mangled(x) and Unrevised(x) -> Concave(x))\nforall x (Mancunian(x) -> Concave(x))\nUnrevised(lester) and Unseeable(lester) -> Mangled(lester)\n\nnot Mangled(lester)\n\nDashed(lester) and forall x (Dashed(x) -> Dishy(x)) -> therefore Dishy(lester) Dishy(lester) and Dashed(lester) and forall x (Dishy(x) and Dashed(x) -> Unseeable(x)) -> therefore Unseeable(lester) Unrevised(lester) and Unseeable(lester) and Unrevised(lester) and Unseeable(lester) -> Mangled(lester) -> therefore Mangled(lester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1473"} {"premises": "The willie is thousand. The willie is hitless. The willie bite the tilda. The willie accelerate the tilda. The willie exasperate the tilda. The tilda is undeceived. The tilda is ranging. The tilda bite the willie. The tilda accelerate the willie. The tilda exasperate the willie. If something bite the willie and it accelerate the tilda then the tilda bite the willie. If something is undeclared and it bite the willie then the willie is ranging. If something bite the tilda then it is undeclared. If something exasperate the willie then it accelerate the tilda. All ranging things are undeclared. If something bite the tilda and it is ranging then the tilda is thousand. The willie is thousand.", "logic": "\nThousand(willie)\nHitless(willie)\nBite(willie, tilda)\nAccelerate(willie, tilda)\nExasperate(willie, tilda)\nUndeceived(tilda)\nRanging(tilda)\nBite(tilda, willie)\nAccelerate(tilda, willie)\nExasperate(tilda, willie)\nforall x (Bite(x, willie) and Accelerate(x, tilda) -> Bite(tilda, willie))\nforall x (Undeclared(x) and Bite(x, willie) -> Ranging(willie))\nforall x (Bite(x, tilda) -> Undeclared(x))\nforall x (Exasperate(x, willie) -> Accelerate(x, tilda))\nforall x (Ranging(x) -> Undeclared(x))\nforall x (Bite(x, tilda) and Ranging(x) -> Thousand(tilda))\n\nThousand(willie)\n\ntherefore Thousand(willie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The dorrie is hebdomadal. The dorrie is wary. The dorrie lacerate the catarina. The dorrie bombilate the catarina. The dorrie decelerate the catarina. The catarina is nutrient. The catarina is obliging. The catarina lacerate the dorrie. The catarina bombilate the dorrie. The catarina decelerate the dorrie. If something lacerate the dorrie and it bombilate the catarina then the catarina lacerate the dorrie. If something is regulative and it lacerate the dorrie then the dorrie is obliging. If something lacerate the catarina then it is regulative. If something decelerate the dorrie then it bombilate the catarina. All obliging things are regulative. If something lacerate the catarina and it is obliging then the catarina is hebdomadal. The dorrie does not need the catarina.", "logic": "\nHebdomadal(dorrie)\nWary(dorrie)\nLacerate(dorrie, catarina)\nBombilate(dorrie, catarina)\nDecelerate(dorrie, catarina)\nNutrient(catarina)\nObliging(catarina)\nLacerate(catarina, dorrie)\nBombilate(catarina, dorrie)\nDecelerate(catarina, dorrie)\nforall x (Lacerate(x, dorrie) and Bombilate(x, catarina) -> Lacerate(catarina, dorrie))\nforall x (Regulative(x) and Lacerate(x, dorrie) -> Obliging(dorrie))\nforall x (Lacerate(x, catarina) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Decelerate(x, dorrie) -> Bombilate(x, catarina))\nforall x (Obliging(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Lacerate(x, catarina) and Obliging(x) -> Hebdomadal(catarina))\n\nnot Bombilate(dorrie, catarina)\n\ntherefore Bombilate(dorrie, catarina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The bernadina is befouled. The bernadina is anosmic. The bernadina polemicize the chas. The bernadina deafen the chas. The bernadina lube the chas. The chas is desired. The chas is deceased. The chas polemicize the bernadina. The chas deafen the bernadina. The chas lube the bernadina. If something polemicize the bernadina and it deafen the chas then the chas polemicize the bernadina. If something is antlered and it polemicize the bernadina then the bernadina is deceased. If something polemicize the chas then it is antlered. If something lube the bernadina then it deafen the chas. All deceased things are antlered. If something polemicize the chas and it is deceased then the chas is befouled. The chas is antlered.", "logic": "\nBefouled(bernadina)\nAnosmic(bernadina)\nPolemicize(bernadina, chas)\nDeafen(bernadina, chas)\nLube(bernadina, chas)\nDesired(chas)\nDeceased(chas)\nPolemicize(chas, bernadina)\nDeafen(chas, bernadina)\nLube(chas, bernadina)\nforall x (Polemicize(x, bernadina) and Deafen(x, chas) -> Polemicize(chas, bernadina))\nforall x (Antlered(x) and Polemicize(x, bernadina) -> Deceased(bernadina))\nforall x (Polemicize(x, chas) -> Antlered(x))\nforall x (Lube(x, bernadina) -> Deafen(x, chas))\nforall x (Deceased(x) -> Antlered(x))\nforall x (Polemicize(x, chas) and Deceased(x) -> Befouled(chas))\n\nAntlered(chas)\n\nDeceased(chas) and forall x (Deceased(x) -> Antlered(x)) -> therefore Antlered(chas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The bjorne is epizootic. The bjorne is slangy. The bjorne sediment the trude. The bjorne coke the trude. The bjorne josh the trude. The trude is unformed. The trude is weatherly. The trude sediment the bjorne. The trude coke the bjorne. The trude josh the bjorne. If something sediment the bjorne and it coke the trude then the trude sediment the bjorne. If something is hooflike and it sediment the bjorne then the bjorne is weatherly. If something sediment the trude then it is hooflike. If something josh the bjorne then it coke the trude. All weatherly things are hooflike. If something sediment the trude and it is weatherly then the trude is epizootic. The trude is not hooflike.", "logic": "\nEpizootic(bjorne)\nSlangy(bjorne)\nSediment(bjorne, trude)\nCoke(bjorne, trude)\nJosh(bjorne, trude)\nUnformed(trude)\nWeatherly(trude)\nSediment(trude, bjorne)\nCoke(trude, bjorne)\nJosh(trude, bjorne)\nforall x (Sediment(x, bjorne) and Coke(x, trude) -> Sediment(trude, bjorne))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and Sediment(x, bjorne) -> Weatherly(bjorne))\nforall x (Sediment(x, trude) -> Hooflike(x))\nforall x (Josh(x, bjorne) -> Coke(x, trude))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) -> Hooflike(x))\nforall x (Sediment(x, trude) and Weatherly(x) -> Epizootic(trude))\n\nnot Hooflike(trude)\n\nWeatherly(trude) and forall x (Weatherly(x) -> Hooflike(x)) -> therefore Hooflike(trude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The kaile is awless. The kaile is humourous. The kaile toady the dabney. The kaile valuate the dabney. The kaile waul the dabney. The dabney is habitable. The dabney is convincing. The dabney toady the kaile. The dabney valuate the kaile. The dabney waul the kaile. If something toady the kaile and it valuate the dabney then the dabney toady the kaile. If something is narcotic and it toady the kaile then the kaile is convincing. If something toady the dabney then it is narcotic. If something waul the kaile then it valuate the dabney. All convincing things are narcotic. If something toady the dabney and it is convincing then the dabney is awless. The kaile is convincing.", "logic": "\nAwless(kaile)\nHumourous(kaile)\nToady(kaile, dabney)\nValuate(kaile, dabney)\nWaul(kaile, dabney)\nHabitable(dabney)\nConvincing(dabney)\nToady(dabney, kaile)\nValuate(dabney, kaile)\nWaul(dabney, kaile)\nforall x (Toady(x, kaile) and Valuate(x, dabney) -> Toady(dabney, kaile))\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Toady(x, kaile) -> Convincing(kaile))\nforall x (Toady(x, dabney) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Waul(x, kaile) -> Valuate(x, dabney))\nforall x (Convincing(x) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Toady(x, dabney) and Convincing(x) -> Awless(dabney))\n\nConvincing(kaile)\n\nConvincing(dabney) and forall x (Convincing(x) -> Narcotic(x)) -> therefore Narcotic(dabney) Narcotic(dabney) and Toady(dabney, kaile) and forall x (Narcotic(x) and Toady(x, kaile) -> Convincing(kaile)) -> therefore Convincing(kaile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The gabriel is garrulous. The gabriel is benzoic. The gabriel reread the nels. The gabriel dillydally the nels. The gabriel deaminize the nels. The nels is ranging. The nels is dialectic. The nels reread the gabriel. The nels dillydally the gabriel. The nels deaminize the gabriel. If something reread the gabriel and it dillydally the nels then the nels reread the gabriel. If something is irish and it reread the gabriel then the gabriel is dialectic. If something reread the nels then it is irish. If something deaminize the gabriel then it dillydally the nels. All dialectic things are irish. If something reread the nels and it is dialectic then the nels is garrulous. The gabriel is not dialectic.", "logic": "\nGarrulous(gabriel)\nBenzoic(gabriel)\nReread(gabriel, nels)\nDillydally(gabriel, nels)\nDeaminize(gabriel, nels)\nRanging(nels)\nDialectic(nels)\nReread(nels, gabriel)\nDillydally(nels, gabriel)\nDeaminize(nels, gabriel)\nforall x (Reread(x, gabriel) and Dillydally(x, nels) -> Reread(nels, gabriel))\nforall x (Irish(x) and Reread(x, gabriel) -> Dialectic(gabriel))\nforall x (Reread(x, nels) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Deaminize(x, gabriel) -> Dillydally(x, nels))\nforall x (Dialectic(x) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Reread(x, nels) and Dialectic(x) -> Garrulous(nels))\n\nnot Dialectic(gabriel)\n\nDialectic(nels) and forall x (Dialectic(x) -> Irish(x)) -> therefore Irish(nels) Irish(nels) and Reread(nels, gabriel) and forall x (Irish(x) and Reread(x, gabriel) -> Dialectic(gabriel)) -> therefore Dialectic(gabriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The geralda is anguine. The geralda is unvaned. The geralda muddle the eada. The geralda sharpshoot the eada. The geralda debate the eada. The eada is cliched. The eada is sensorial. The eada muddle the geralda. The eada sharpshoot the geralda. The eada debate the geralda. If something muddle the geralda and it sharpshoot the eada then the eada muddle the geralda. If something is squabby and it muddle the geralda then the geralda is sensorial. If something muddle the eada then it is squabby. If something debate the geralda then it sharpshoot the eada. All sensorial things are squabby. If something muddle the eada and it is sensorial then the eada is anguine. The eada is anguine.", "logic": "\nAnguine(geralda)\nUnvaned(geralda)\nMuddle(geralda, eada)\nSharpshoot(geralda, eada)\nDebate(geralda, eada)\nCliched(eada)\nSensorial(eada)\nMuddle(eada, geralda)\nSharpshoot(eada, geralda)\nDebate(eada, geralda)\nforall x (Muddle(x, geralda) and Sharpshoot(x, eada) -> Muddle(eada, geralda))\nforall x (Squabby(x) and Muddle(x, geralda) -> Sensorial(geralda))\nforall x (Muddle(x, eada) -> Squabby(x))\nforall x (Debate(x, geralda) -> Sharpshoot(x, eada))\nforall x (Sensorial(x) -> Squabby(x))\nforall x (Muddle(x, eada) and Sensorial(x) -> Anguine(eada))\n\nAnguine(eada)\n\nSensorial(eada) and forall x (Sensorial(x) -> Squabby(x)) -> therefore Squabby(eada) Squabby(eada) and Muddle(eada, geralda) and forall x (Squabby(x) and Muddle(x, geralda) -> Sensorial(geralda)) -> therefore Sensorial(geralda) Muddle(geralda, eada) and Sensorial(geralda) and forall x (Muddle(x, eada) and Sensorial(x) -> Anguine(eada)) -> therefore Anguine(eada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The siegfried is hulky. The siegfried is continued. The siegfried patinate the jeff. The siegfried knit the jeff. The siegfried predicate the jeff. The jeff is uncreased. The jeff is pliant. The jeff patinate the siegfried. The jeff knit the siegfried. The jeff predicate the siegfried. If something patinate the siegfried and it knit the jeff then the jeff patinate the siegfried. If something is seasick and it patinate the siegfried then the siegfried is pliant. If something patinate the jeff then it is seasick. If something predicate the siegfried then it knit the jeff. All pliant things are seasick. If something patinate the jeff and it is pliant then the jeff is hulky. The jeff is not hulky.", "logic": "\nHulky(siegfried)\nContinued(siegfried)\nPatinate(siegfried, jeff)\nKnit(siegfried, jeff)\nPredicate(siegfried, jeff)\nUncreased(jeff)\nPliant(jeff)\nPatinate(jeff, siegfried)\nKnit(jeff, siegfried)\nPredicate(jeff, siegfried)\nforall x (Patinate(x, siegfried) and Knit(x, jeff) -> Patinate(jeff, siegfried))\nforall x (Seasick(x) and Patinate(x, siegfried) -> Pliant(siegfried))\nforall x (Patinate(x, jeff) -> Seasick(x))\nforall x (Predicate(x, siegfried) -> Knit(x, jeff))\nforall x (Pliant(x) -> Seasick(x))\nforall x (Patinate(x, jeff) and Pliant(x) -> Hulky(jeff))\n\nnot Hulky(jeff)\n\nPliant(jeff) and forall x (Pliant(x) -> Seasick(x)) -> therefore Seasick(jeff) Seasick(jeff) and Patinate(jeff, siegfried) and forall x (Seasick(x) and Patinate(x, siegfried) -> Pliant(siegfried)) -> therefore Pliant(siegfried) Patinate(siegfried, jeff) and Pliant(siegfried) and forall x (Patinate(x, jeff) and Pliant(x) -> Hulky(jeff)) -> therefore Hulky(jeff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The devinne is pukka. The devinne is inviolable. The devinne plough the perl. The devinne copyedit the perl. The devinne winterize the perl. The perl is arthurian. The perl is unsolvable. The perl plough the devinne. The perl copyedit the devinne. The perl winterize the devinne. If something plough the devinne and it copyedit the perl then the perl plough the devinne. If something is dangerous and it plough the devinne then the devinne is unsolvable. If something plough the perl then it is dangerous. If something winterize the devinne then it copyedit the perl. All unsolvable things are dangerous. If something plough the perl and it is unsolvable then the perl is pukka. The perl does not see the perl.", "logic": "\nPukka(devinne)\nInviolable(devinne)\nPlough(devinne, perl)\nCopyedit(devinne, perl)\nWinterize(devinne, perl)\nArthurian(perl)\nUnsolvable(perl)\nPlough(perl, devinne)\nCopyedit(perl, devinne)\nWinterize(perl, devinne)\nforall x (Plough(x, devinne) and Copyedit(x, perl) -> Plough(perl, devinne))\nforall x (Dangerous(x) and Plough(x, devinne) -> Unsolvable(devinne))\nforall x (Plough(x, perl) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Winterize(x, devinne) -> Copyedit(x, perl))\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Plough(x, perl) and Unsolvable(x) -> Pukka(perl))\n\nnot Winterize(perl, perl)\n\nnot Winterize(perl, perl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The mohammed is unservile. The mohammed is gnarled. The mohammed motorboat the zackariah. The mohammed brew the zackariah. The mohammed secularise the zackariah. The zackariah is candid. The zackariah is bivariate. The zackariah motorboat the mohammed. The zackariah brew the mohammed. The zackariah secularise the mohammed. If something motorboat the mohammed and it brew the zackariah then the zackariah motorboat the mohammed. If something is mussy and it motorboat the mohammed then the mohammed is bivariate. If something motorboat the zackariah then it is mussy. If something secularise the mohammed then it brew the zackariah. All bivariate things are mussy. If something motorboat the zackariah and it is bivariate then the zackariah is unservile. The mohammed brew the mohammed.", "logic": "\nUnservile(mohammed)\nGnarled(mohammed)\nMotorboat(mohammed, zackariah)\nBrew(mohammed, zackariah)\nSecularise(mohammed, zackariah)\nCandid(zackariah)\nBivariate(zackariah)\nMotorboat(zackariah, mohammed)\nBrew(zackariah, mohammed)\nSecularise(zackariah, mohammed)\nforall x (Motorboat(x, mohammed) and Brew(x, zackariah) -> Motorboat(zackariah, mohammed))\nforall x (Mussy(x) and Motorboat(x, mohammed) -> Bivariate(mohammed))\nforall x (Motorboat(x, zackariah) -> Mussy(x))\nforall x (Secularise(x, mohammed) -> Brew(x, zackariah))\nforall x (Bivariate(x) -> Mussy(x))\nforall x (Motorboat(x, zackariah) and Bivariate(x) -> Unservile(zackariah))\n\nBrew(mohammed, mohammed)\n\nBrew(mohammed, mohammed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The gloria is untrod. The gloria is broadband. The gloria hemstitch the jacob. The gloria narcotize the jacob. The gloria pale the jacob. The jacob is formative. The jacob is prodromic. The jacob hemstitch the gloria. The jacob narcotize the gloria. The jacob pale the gloria. If something hemstitch the gloria and it narcotize the jacob then the jacob hemstitch the gloria. If something is toasted and it hemstitch the gloria then the gloria is prodromic. If something hemstitch the jacob then it is toasted. If something pale the gloria then it narcotize the jacob. All prodromic things are toasted. If something hemstitch the jacob and it is prodromic then the jacob is untrod. The gloria does not see the gloria.", "logic": "\nUntrod(gloria)\nBroadband(gloria)\nHemstitch(gloria, jacob)\nNarcotize(gloria, jacob)\nPale(gloria, jacob)\nFormative(jacob)\nProdromic(jacob)\nHemstitch(jacob, gloria)\nNarcotize(jacob, gloria)\nPale(jacob, gloria)\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, gloria) and Narcotize(x, jacob) -> Hemstitch(jacob, gloria))\nforall x (Toasted(x) and Hemstitch(x, gloria) -> Prodromic(gloria))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, jacob) -> Toasted(x))\nforall x (Pale(x, gloria) -> Narcotize(x, jacob))\nforall x (Prodromic(x) -> Toasted(x))\nforall x (Hemstitch(x, jacob) and Prodromic(x) -> Untrod(jacob))\n\nnot Pale(gloria, gloria)\n\nnot Pale(gloria, gloria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The wallis is contained. The wallis is enough. The wallis intend the kelley. The wallis shipwreck the kelley. The wallis demonetise the kelley. The kelley is lacrimal. The kelley is unbarred. The kelley intend the wallis. The kelley shipwreck the wallis. The kelley demonetise the wallis. If something intend the wallis and it shipwreck the kelley then the kelley intend the wallis. If something is beaten and it intend the wallis then the wallis is unbarred. If something intend the kelley then it is beaten. If something demonetise the wallis then it shipwreck the kelley. All unbarred things are beaten. If something intend the kelley and it is unbarred then the kelley is contained. The kelley intend the kelley.", "logic": "\nContained(wallis)\nEnough(wallis)\nIntend(wallis, kelley)\nShipwreck(wallis, kelley)\nDemonetise(wallis, kelley)\nLacrimal(kelley)\nUnbarred(kelley)\nIntend(kelley, wallis)\nShipwreck(kelley, wallis)\nDemonetise(kelley, wallis)\nforall x (Intend(x, wallis) and Shipwreck(x, kelley) -> Intend(kelley, wallis))\nforall x (Beaten(x) and Intend(x, wallis) -> Unbarred(wallis))\nforall x (Intend(x, kelley) -> Beaten(x))\nforall x (Demonetise(x, wallis) -> Shipwreck(x, kelley))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) -> Beaten(x))\nforall x (Intend(x, kelley) and Unbarred(x) -> Contained(kelley))\n\nIntend(kelley, kelley)\n\nIntend(kelley, kelley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The osbourne is trifid. The osbourne is shielded. The osbourne entrap the juditha. The osbourne fritter the juditha. The osbourne lour the juditha. The juditha is vulpine. The juditha is actuating. The juditha entrap the osbourne. The juditha fritter the osbourne. The juditha lour the osbourne. If something entrap the osbourne and it fritter the juditha then the juditha entrap the osbourne. If something is araneidal and it entrap the osbourne then the osbourne is actuating. If something entrap the juditha then it is araneidal. If something lour the osbourne then it fritter the juditha. All actuating things are araneidal. If something entrap the juditha and it is actuating then the juditha is trifid. The juditha is not shielded.", "logic": "\nTrifid(osbourne)\nShielded(osbourne)\nEntrap(osbourne, juditha)\nFritter(osbourne, juditha)\nLour(osbourne, juditha)\nVulpine(juditha)\nActuating(juditha)\nEntrap(juditha, osbourne)\nFritter(juditha, osbourne)\nLour(juditha, osbourne)\nforall x (Entrap(x, osbourne) and Fritter(x, juditha) -> Entrap(juditha, osbourne))\nforall x (Araneidal(x) and Entrap(x, osbourne) -> Actuating(osbourne))\nforall x (Entrap(x, juditha) -> Araneidal(x))\nforall x (Lour(x, osbourne) -> Fritter(x, juditha))\nforall x (Actuating(x) -> Araneidal(x))\nforall x (Entrap(x, juditha) and Actuating(x) -> Trifid(juditha))\n\nnot Shielded(juditha)\n\nnot Shielded(juditha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "The glennis is suburban. The glennis is requested. The glennis perpetrate the stew. The glennis parget the stew. The glennis immerse the stew. The stew is dissected. The stew is mock. The stew perpetrate the glennis. The stew parget the glennis. The stew immerse the glennis. If something perpetrate the glennis and it parget the stew then the stew perpetrate the glennis. If something is skint and it perpetrate the glennis then the glennis is mock. If something perpetrate the stew then it is skint. If something immerse the glennis then it parget the stew. All mock things are skint. If something perpetrate the stew and it is mock then the stew is suburban. The glennis perpetrate the glennis.", "logic": "\nSuburban(glennis)\nRequested(glennis)\nPerpetrate(glennis, stew)\nParget(glennis, stew)\nImmerse(glennis, stew)\nDissected(stew)\nMock(stew)\nPerpetrate(stew, glennis)\nParget(stew, glennis)\nImmerse(stew, glennis)\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, glennis) and Parget(x, stew) -> Perpetrate(stew, glennis))\nforall x (Skint(x) and Perpetrate(x, glennis) -> Mock(glennis))\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, stew) -> Skint(x))\nforall x (Immerse(x, glennis) -> Parget(x, stew))\nforall x (Mock(x) -> Skint(x))\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, stew) and Mock(x) -> Suburban(stew))\n\nPerpetrate(glennis, glennis)\n\nPerpetrate(glennis, glennis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-599"} {"premises": "Hanan is content. Hanan is warm. Hanan is harnessed. Hanan is regretful. Guinevere is thorough. Guinevere is accusive. Guinevere is harnessed. Guinevere is regretful. Blithe is content. Blithe is evasive. Oralla is warm. Oralla is harnessed. Cold things are accusive. Quiet things are thorough. If Oralla is evasive and Oralla is regretful then Oralla is accusive. If something is harnessed then it is evasive. If Blithe is harnessed then Blithe is warm. Nice things are content. Hanan is content.", "logic": "\nContent(hanan)\nWarm(hanan)\nHarnessed(hanan)\nRegretful(hanan)\nThorough(guinevere)\nAccusive(guinevere)\nHarnessed(guinevere)\nRegretful(guinevere)\nContent(blithe)\nEvasive(blithe)\nWarm(oralla)\nHarnessed(oralla)\nforall x (Warm(x) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Accusive(x) -> Thorough(x))\nEvasive(oralla) and Regretful(oralla) -> Accusive(oralla)\nforall x (Harnessed(x) -> Evasive(x))\nHarnessed(blithe) -> Warm(blithe)\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Content(x))\n\nContent(hanan)\n\ntherefore Content(hanan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Merci is moderate. Merci is evil. Merci is gaga. Merci is savourless. Ian is lowered. Ian is civilised. Ian is gaga. Ian is savourless. Janel is moderate. Janel is lengthwise. Timothee is evil. Timothee is gaga. Cold things are civilised. Quiet things are lowered. If Timothee is lengthwise and Timothee is savourless then Timothee is civilised. If something is gaga then it is lengthwise. If Janel is gaga then Janel is evil. Nice things are moderate. Janel is not lengthwise.", "logic": "\nModerate(merci)\nEvil(merci)\nGaga(merci)\nSavourless(merci)\nLowered(ian)\nCivilised(ian)\nGaga(ian)\nSavourless(ian)\nModerate(janel)\nLengthwise(janel)\nEvil(timothee)\nGaga(timothee)\nforall x (Evil(x) -> Civilised(x))\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Lowered(x))\nLengthwise(timothee) and Savourless(timothee) -> Civilised(timothee)\nforall x (Gaga(x) -> Lengthwise(x))\nGaga(janel) -> Evil(janel)\nforall x (Lowered(x) -> Moderate(x))\n\nnot Lengthwise(janel)\n\ntherefore Lengthwise(janel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Zarla is forbidding. Zarla is sewn. Zarla is semiotical. Zarla is inexact. Nana is filiform. Nana is upright. Nana is semiotical. Nana is inexact. Burke is forbidding. Burke is rattling. Mattheus is sewn. Mattheus is semiotical. Cold things are upright. Quiet things are filiform. If Mattheus is rattling and Mattheus is inexact then Mattheus is upright. If something is semiotical then it is rattling. If Burke is semiotical then Burke is sewn. Nice things are forbidding. Mattheus is rattling.", "logic": "\nForbidding(zarla)\nSewn(zarla)\nSemiotical(zarla)\nInexact(zarla)\nFiliform(nana)\nUpright(nana)\nSemiotical(nana)\nInexact(nana)\nForbidding(burke)\nRattling(burke)\nSewn(mattheus)\nSemiotical(mattheus)\nforall x (Sewn(x) -> Upright(x))\nforall x (Upright(x) -> Filiform(x))\nRattling(mattheus) and Inexact(mattheus) -> Upright(mattheus)\nforall x (Semiotical(x) -> Rattling(x))\nSemiotical(burke) -> Sewn(burke)\nforall x (Filiform(x) -> Forbidding(x))\n\nRattling(mattheus)\n\nSemiotical(mattheus) and forall x (Semiotical(x) -> Rattling(x)) -> therefore Rattling(mattheus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Tonya is aquaphobic. Tonya is ninefold. Tonya is autotelic. Tonya is echoless. Penny is lowercase. Penny is chestnut. Penny is autotelic. Penny is echoless. Maxfield is aquaphobic. Maxfield is disloyal. Avrit is ninefold. Avrit is autotelic. Cold things are chestnut. Quiet things are lowercase. If Avrit is disloyal and Avrit is echoless then Avrit is chestnut. If something is autotelic then it is disloyal. If Maxfield is autotelic then Maxfield is ninefold. Nice things are aquaphobic. Tonya is not disloyal.", "logic": "\nAquaphobic(tonya)\nNinefold(tonya)\nAutotelic(tonya)\nEcholess(tonya)\nLowercase(penny)\nChestnut(penny)\nAutotelic(penny)\nEcholess(penny)\nAquaphobic(maxfield)\nDisloyal(maxfield)\nNinefold(avrit)\nAutotelic(avrit)\nforall x (Ninefold(x) -> Chestnut(x))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) -> Lowercase(x))\nDisloyal(avrit) and Echoless(avrit) -> Chestnut(avrit)\nforall x (Autotelic(x) -> Disloyal(x))\nAutotelic(maxfield) -> Ninefold(maxfield)\nforall x (Lowercase(x) -> Aquaphobic(x))\n\nnot Disloyal(tonya)\n\nAutotelic(tonya) and forall x (Autotelic(x) -> Disloyal(x)) -> therefore Disloyal(tonya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Dinah is aerolitic. Dinah is bantoid. Dinah is revolting. Dinah is unstilted. Pammie is mirky. Pammie is autoicous. Pammie is revolting. Pammie is unstilted. Debora is aerolitic. Debora is gainly. Melisa is bantoid. Melisa is revolting. Cold things are autoicous. Quiet things are mirky. If Melisa is gainly and Melisa is unstilted then Melisa is autoicous. If something is revolting then it is gainly. If Debora is revolting then Debora is bantoid. Nice things are aerolitic. Dinah is mirky.", "logic": "\nAerolitic(dinah)\nBantoid(dinah)\nRevolting(dinah)\nUnstilted(dinah)\nMirky(pammie)\nAutoicous(pammie)\nRevolting(pammie)\nUnstilted(pammie)\nAerolitic(debora)\nGainly(debora)\nBantoid(melisa)\nRevolting(melisa)\nforall x (Bantoid(x) -> Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Autoicous(x) -> Mirky(x))\nGainly(melisa) and Unstilted(melisa) -> Autoicous(melisa)\nforall x (Revolting(x) -> Gainly(x))\nRevolting(debora) -> Bantoid(debora)\nforall x (Mirky(x) -> Aerolitic(x))\n\nMirky(dinah)\n\nBantoid(dinah) and forall x (Bantoid(x) -> Autoicous(x)) -> therefore Autoicous(dinah) Autoicous(dinah) and forall x (Autoicous(x) -> Mirky(x)) -> therefore Mirky(dinah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Minerva is tyrolese. Minerva is crabwise. Minerva is hominid. Minerva is outspread. Meris is inky. Meris is aestival. Meris is hominid. Meris is outspread. Hewe is tyrolese. Hewe is binding. Joyan is crabwise. Joyan is hominid. Cold things are aestival. Quiet things are inky. If Joyan is binding and Joyan is outspread then Joyan is aestival. If something is hominid then it is binding. If Hewe is hominid then Hewe is crabwise. Nice things are tyrolese. Minerva is not inky.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(minerva)\nCrabwise(minerva)\nHominid(minerva)\nOutspread(minerva)\nInky(meris)\nAestival(meris)\nHominid(meris)\nOutspread(meris)\nTyrolese(hewe)\nBinding(hewe)\nCrabwise(joyan)\nHominid(joyan)\nforall x (Crabwise(x) -> Aestival(x))\nforall x (Aestival(x) -> Inky(x))\nBinding(joyan) and Outspread(joyan) -> Aestival(joyan)\nforall x (Hominid(x) -> Binding(x))\nHominid(hewe) -> Crabwise(hewe)\nforall x (Inky(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\n\nnot Inky(minerva)\n\nCrabwise(minerva) and forall x (Crabwise(x) -> Aestival(x)) -> therefore Aestival(minerva) Aestival(minerva) and forall x (Aestival(x) -> Inky(x)) -> therefore Inky(minerva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Leonid is edentate. Leonid is beamish. Leonid is bacillar. Leonid is western. Alfreda is berried. Alfreda is budgetary. Alfreda is bacillar. Alfreda is western. Nicolas is edentate. Nicolas is untellable. Flossie is beamish. Flossie is bacillar. Cold things are budgetary. Quiet things are berried. If Flossie is untellable and Flossie is western then Flossie is budgetary. If something is bacillar then it is untellable. If Nicolas is bacillar then Nicolas is beamish. Nice things are edentate. Flossie is edentate.", "logic": "\nEdentate(leonid)\nBeamish(leonid)\nBacillar(leonid)\nWestern(leonid)\nBerried(alfreda)\nBudgetary(alfreda)\nBacillar(alfreda)\nWestern(alfreda)\nEdentate(nicolas)\nUntellable(nicolas)\nBeamish(flossie)\nBacillar(flossie)\nforall x (Beamish(x) -> Budgetary(x))\nforall x (Budgetary(x) -> Berried(x))\nUntellable(flossie) and Western(flossie) -> Budgetary(flossie)\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Untellable(x))\nBacillar(nicolas) -> Beamish(nicolas)\nforall x (Berried(x) -> Edentate(x))\n\nEdentate(flossie)\n\nBeamish(flossie) and forall x (Beamish(x) -> Budgetary(x)) -> therefore Budgetary(flossie) Budgetary(flossie) and forall x (Budgetary(x) -> Berried(x)) -> therefore Berried(flossie) Berried(flossie) and forall x (Berried(x) -> Edentate(x)) -> therefore Edentate(flossie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Ivor is scattered. Ivor is risible. Ivor is heliac. Ivor is undersized. Dudley is chilling. Dudley is isolated. Dudley is heliac. Dudley is undersized. Faunie is scattered. Faunie is exegetic. Thurstan is risible. Thurstan is heliac. Cold things are isolated. Quiet things are chilling. If Thurstan is exegetic and Thurstan is undersized then Thurstan is isolated. If something is heliac then it is exegetic. If Faunie is heliac then Faunie is risible. Nice things are scattered. Thurstan is not scattered.", "logic": "\nScattered(ivor)\nRisible(ivor)\nHeliac(ivor)\nUndersized(ivor)\nChilling(dudley)\nIsolated(dudley)\nHeliac(dudley)\nUndersized(dudley)\nScattered(faunie)\nExegetic(faunie)\nRisible(thurstan)\nHeliac(thurstan)\nforall x (Risible(x) -> Isolated(x))\nforall x (Isolated(x) -> Chilling(x))\nExegetic(thurstan) and Undersized(thurstan) -> Isolated(thurstan)\nforall x (Heliac(x) -> Exegetic(x))\nHeliac(faunie) -> Risible(faunie)\nforall x (Chilling(x) -> Scattered(x))\n\nnot Scattered(thurstan)\n\nRisible(thurstan) and forall x (Risible(x) -> Isolated(x)) -> therefore Isolated(thurstan) Isolated(thurstan) and forall x (Isolated(x) -> Chilling(x)) -> therefore Chilling(thurstan) Chilling(thurstan) and forall x (Chilling(x) -> Scattered(x)) -> therefore Scattered(thurstan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Edyth is untimely. Edyth is antique. Edyth is enlarged. Edyth is pure. Shandee is acetic. Shandee is bumpy. Shandee is enlarged. Shandee is pure. Merrile is untimely. Merrile is bovid. Dulcie is antique. Dulcie is enlarged. Cold things are bumpy. Quiet things are acetic. If Dulcie is bovid and Dulcie is pure then Dulcie is bumpy. If something is enlarged then it is bovid. If Merrile is enlarged then Merrile is antique. Nice things are untimely. Merrile is not acetic.", "logic": "\nUntimely(edyth)\nAntique(edyth)\nEnlarged(edyth)\nPure(edyth)\nAcetic(shandee)\nBumpy(shandee)\nEnlarged(shandee)\nPure(shandee)\nUntimely(merrile)\nBovid(merrile)\nAntique(dulcie)\nEnlarged(dulcie)\nforall x (Antique(x) -> Bumpy(x))\nforall x (Bumpy(x) -> Acetic(x))\nBovid(dulcie) and Pure(dulcie) -> Bumpy(dulcie)\nforall x (Enlarged(x) -> Bovid(x))\nEnlarged(merrile) -> Antique(merrile)\nforall x (Acetic(x) -> Untimely(x))\n\nnot Acetic(merrile)\n\nforall x (Bumpy(x) -> Acetic(x)) <- forall x (Antique(x) -> Bumpy(x)) <- Enlarged(merrile) -> Antique(merrile) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Judd is woven. Judd is monodic. Judd is etiologic. Judd is knightly. Irving is inebriated. Irving is bicyclic. Irving is etiologic. Irving is knightly. Willow is woven. Willow is nonmotile. Finn is monodic. Finn is etiologic. Cold things are bicyclic. Quiet things are inebriated. If Finn is nonmotile and Finn is knightly then Finn is bicyclic. If something is etiologic then it is nonmotile. If Willow is etiologic then Willow is monodic. Nice things are woven. Willow is bicyclic.", "logic": "\nWoven(judd)\nMonodic(judd)\nEtiologic(judd)\nKnightly(judd)\nInebriated(irving)\nBicyclic(irving)\nEtiologic(irving)\nKnightly(irving)\nWoven(willow)\nNonmotile(willow)\nMonodic(finn)\nEtiologic(finn)\nforall x (Monodic(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) -> Inebriated(x))\nNonmotile(finn) and Knightly(finn) -> Bicyclic(finn)\nforall x (Etiologic(x) -> Nonmotile(x))\nEtiologic(willow) -> Monodic(willow)\nforall x (Inebriated(x) -> Woven(x))\n\nBicyclic(willow)\n\nforall x (Monodic(x) -> Bicyclic(x)) <- Etiologic(willow) -> Monodic(willow) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Lothar is foster. Lothar is documented. Lothar is loved. Lothar is siamese. Olive is anxious. Olive is olden. Olive is loved. Olive is siamese. Stephan is foster. Stephan is brimming. Armand is documented. Armand is loved. Cold things are olden. Quiet things are anxious. If Armand is brimming and Armand is siamese then Armand is olden. If something is loved then it is brimming. If Stephan is loved then Stephan is documented. Nice things are foster. Stephan is not documented.", "logic": "\nFoster(lothar)\nDocumented(lothar)\nLoved(lothar)\nSiamese(lothar)\nAnxious(olive)\nOlden(olive)\nLoved(olive)\nSiamese(olive)\nFoster(stephan)\nBrimming(stephan)\nDocumented(armand)\nLoved(armand)\nforall x (Documented(x) -> Olden(x))\nforall x (Olden(x) -> Anxious(x))\nBrimming(armand) and Siamese(armand) -> Olden(armand)\nforall x (Loved(x) -> Brimming(x))\nLoved(stephan) -> Documented(stephan)\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Foster(x))\n\nnot Documented(stephan)\n\nLoved(stephan) -> Documented(stephan) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Cyrille is unbacked. Cyrille is ruthful. Cyrille is guardant. Cyrille is inexplicit. Abbe is sadducean. Abbe is nigerian. Abbe is guardant. Abbe is inexplicit. Bryana is unbacked. Bryana is quotable. Riva is ruthful. Riva is guardant. Cold things are nigerian. Quiet things are sadducean. If Riva is quotable and Riva is inexplicit then Riva is nigerian. If something is guardant then it is quotable. If Bryana is guardant then Bryana is ruthful. Nice things are unbacked. Bryana is inexplicit.", "logic": "\nUnbacked(cyrille)\nRuthful(cyrille)\nGuardant(cyrille)\nInexplicit(cyrille)\nSadducean(abbe)\nNigerian(abbe)\nGuardant(abbe)\nInexplicit(abbe)\nUnbacked(bryana)\nQuotable(bryana)\nRuthful(riva)\nGuardant(riva)\nforall x (Ruthful(x) -> Nigerian(x))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nQuotable(riva) and Inexplicit(riva) -> Nigerian(riva)\nforall x (Guardant(x) -> Quotable(x))\nGuardant(bryana) -> Ruthful(bryana)\nforall x (Sadducean(x) -> Unbacked(x))\n\nInexplicit(bryana)\n\nInexplicit(bryana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Rosemonde is catatonic. Rosemonde is enthralled. Rosemonde is tumultuous. Rosemonde is pedigree. Marthena is unread. Marthena is latent. Marthena is tumultuous. Marthena is pedigree. Beverlie is catatonic. Beverlie is prosthetic. Missy is enthralled. Missy is tumultuous. Cold things are latent. Quiet things are unread. If Missy is prosthetic and Missy is pedigree then Missy is latent. If something is tumultuous then it is prosthetic. If Beverlie is tumultuous then Beverlie is enthralled. Nice things are catatonic. Beverlie is not tumultuous.", "logic": "\nCatatonic(rosemonde)\nEnthralled(rosemonde)\nTumultuous(rosemonde)\nPedigree(rosemonde)\nUnread(marthena)\nLatent(marthena)\nTumultuous(marthena)\nPedigree(marthena)\nCatatonic(beverlie)\nProsthetic(beverlie)\nEnthralled(missy)\nTumultuous(missy)\nforall x (Enthralled(x) -> Latent(x))\nforall x (Latent(x) -> Unread(x))\nProsthetic(missy) and Pedigree(missy) -> Latent(missy)\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Prosthetic(x))\nTumultuous(beverlie) -> Enthralled(beverlie)\nforall x (Unread(x) -> Catatonic(x))\n\nnot Tumultuous(beverlie)\n\nnot Tumultuous(beverlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Cooper is seeing. Cooper is standpat. Cooper is english. Cooper is gutless. Janette is sinewy. Janette is baccate. Janette is english. Janette is gutless. Lucien is seeing. Lucien is weird. Cassondra is standpat. Cassondra is english. Cold things are baccate. Quiet things are sinewy. If Cassondra is weird and Cassondra is gutless then Cassondra is baccate. If something is english then it is weird. If Lucien is english then Lucien is standpat. Nice things are seeing. Cassondra is gutless.", "logic": "\nSeeing(cooper)\nStandpat(cooper)\nEnglish(cooper)\nGutless(cooper)\nSinewy(janette)\nBaccate(janette)\nEnglish(janette)\nGutless(janette)\nSeeing(lucien)\nWeird(lucien)\nStandpat(cassondra)\nEnglish(cassondra)\nforall x (Standpat(x) -> Baccate(x))\nforall x (Baccate(x) -> Sinewy(x))\nWeird(cassondra) and Gutless(cassondra) -> Baccate(cassondra)\nforall x (English(x) -> Weird(x))\nEnglish(lucien) -> Standpat(lucien)\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Seeing(x))\n\nGutless(cassondra)\n\nGutless(cassondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Gwendolen is spicate. Gwendolen is illogical. Gwendolen is diaphysial. Gwendolen is nosey. Gwendolen is manful. Linoel is spicate. Linoel is illogical. Linoel is diaphysial. Linoel is kenyan. Linoel is nosey. Linoel is antigenic. Linoel is manful. Aloysius is spicate. Aloysius is illogical. Aloysius is diaphysial. Aloysius is kenyan. If something is antigenic and illogical then it is nosey. All nosey things are diaphysial. If Linoel is manful then Linoel is illogical. Big, nosey things are illogical. If something is nosey then it is diaphysial. Big things are antigenic. Gwendolen is diaphysial.", "logic": "\nSpicate(gwendolen)\nIllogical(gwendolen)\nDiaphysial(gwendolen)\nNosey(gwendolen)\nManful(gwendolen)\nSpicate(linoel)\nIllogical(linoel)\nDiaphysial(linoel)\nKenyan(linoel)\nNosey(linoel)\nAntigenic(linoel)\nManful(linoel)\nSpicate(aloysius)\nIllogical(aloysius)\nDiaphysial(aloysius)\nKenyan(aloysius)\nforall x (Antigenic(x) and Illogical(x) -> Nosey(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nManful(linoel) -> Illogical(linoel)\nforall x (Spicate(x) and Nosey(x) -> Illogical(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nforall x (Spicate(x) -> Antigenic(x))\n\nDiaphysial(gwendolen)\n\ntherefore Diaphysial(gwendolen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1222"} {"premises": "Cassondra is unexpired. Cassondra is probatory. Cassondra is rheumatic. Cassondra is goodish. Cassondra is infrared. Jeane is unexpired. Jeane is probatory. Jeane is rheumatic. Jeane is versed. Jeane is goodish. Jeane is coccal. Jeane is infrared. Ladonna is unexpired. Ladonna is probatory. Ladonna is rheumatic. Ladonna is versed. If something is coccal and probatory then it is goodish. All goodish things are rheumatic. If Jeane is infrared then Jeane is probatory. Big, goodish things are probatory. If something is goodish then it is rheumatic. Big things are coccal. Jeane is not coccal.", "logic": "\nUnexpired(cassondra)\nProbatory(cassondra)\nRheumatic(cassondra)\nGoodish(cassondra)\nInfrared(cassondra)\nUnexpired(jeane)\nProbatory(jeane)\nRheumatic(jeane)\nVersed(jeane)\nGoodish(jeane)\nCoccal(jeane)\nInfrared(jeane)\nUnexpired(ladonna)\nProbatory(ladonna)\nRheumatic(ladonna)\nVersed(ladonna)\nforall x (Coccal(x) and Probatory(x) -> Goodish(x))\nforall x (Goodish(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\nInfrared(jeane) -> Probatory(jeane)\nforall x (Unexpired(x) and Goodish(x) -> Probatory(x))\nforall x (Goodish(x) -> Rheumatic(x))\nforall x (Unexpired(x) -> Coccal(x))\n\nnot Coccal(jeane)\n\ntherefore Coccal(jeane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1222"} {"premises": "Godard is resistible. Godard is singular. Godard is goaded. Godard is tumescent. Godard is botryoidal. Teador is resistible. Teador is singular. Teador is goaded. Teador is bleak. Teador is tumescent. Teador is abient. Teador is botryoidal. Adriane is resistible. Adriane is singular. Adriane is goaded. Adriane is bleak. If something is abient and singular then it is tumescent. All tumescent things are goaded. If Teador is botryoidal then Teador is singular. Big, tumescent things are singular. If something is tumescent then it is goaded. Big things are abient. Godard is not bleak.", "logic": "\nResistible(godard)\nSingular(godard)\nGoaded(godard)\nTumescent(godard)\nBotryoidal(godard)\nResistible(teador)\nSingular(teador)\nGoaded(teador)\nBleak(teador)\nTumescent(teador)\nAbient(teador)\nBotryoidal(teador)\nResistible(adriane)\nSingular(adriane)\nGoaded(adriane)\nBleak(adriane)\nforall x (Abient(x) and Singular(x) -> Tumescent(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) -> Goaded(x))\nBotryoidal(teador) -> Singular(teador)\nforall x (Resistible(x) and Tumescent(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Tumescent(x) -> Goaded(x))\nforall x (Resistible(x) -> Abient(x))\n\nnot Bleak(godard)\n\nnot Bleak(godard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1222"} {"premises": "Berny is categoric. Berny is projected. Berny is bubbling. Berny is tiptoe. Berny is allomerous. Marya is categoric. Marya is projected. Marya is bubbling. Marya is arrogant. Marya is tiptoe. Marya is maxillary. Marya is allomerous. Ardra is categoric. Ardra is projected. Ardra is bubbling. Ardra is arrogant. If something is maxillary and projected then it is tiptoe. All tiptoe things are bubbling. If Marya is allomerous then Marya is projected. Big, tiptoe things are projected. If something is tiptoe then it is bubbling. Big things are maxillary. Ardra is allomerous.", "logic": "\nCategoric(berny)\nProjected(berny)\nBubbling(berny)\nTiptoe(berny)\nAllomerous(berny)\nCategoric(marya)\nProjected(marya)\nBubbling(marya)\nArrogant(marya)\nTiptoe(marya)\nMaxillary(marya)\nAllomerous(marya)\nCategoric(ardra)\nProjected(ardra)\nBubbling(ardra)\nArrogant(ardra)\nforall x (Maxillary(x) and Projected(x) -> Tiptoe(x))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) -> Bubbling(x))\nAllomerous(marya) -> Projected(marya)\nforall x (Categoric(x) and Tiptoe(x) -> Projected(x))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) -> Bubbling(x))\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Maxillary(x))\n\nAllomerous(ardra)\n\nAllomerous(ardra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1222"} {"premises": "The row unite the randolf. The row is tallish. The row is not xcviii. The row does not like the randolf. The row piece the enrico. The randolf does not chase the enrico. The randolf piece the enrico. The enrico unite the row. The enrico unite the randolf. The enrico is xcviii. If someone unite the enrico then the enrico is tallish. If the enrico is nutty and the enrico unite the row then the row robe the randolf. If someone robe the randolf then the randolf does not like the enrico. If someone is tallish then they chase the enrico. Rough people are xcviii. If the randolf piece the row then the row is not fervid. If someone is tallish and they do not chase the randolf then they are not flagitious. If someone robe the row and the row does not visit the randolf then the row piece the randolf. The row piece the enrico.", "logic": "\nUnite(row, randolf)\nTallish(row)\nnot Xcviii(row)\nnot Piece(row, randolf)\nPiece(row, enrico)\nnot Unite(randolf, enrico)\nPiece(randolf, enrico)\nUnite(enrico, row)\nUnite(enrico, randolf)\nXcviii(enrico)\nforall x (Unite(x, enrico) -> Tallish(enrico))\nNutty(enrico) and Unite(enrico, row) -> Robe(row, randolf)\nforall x (Robe(x, randolf) -> not Piece(randolf, enrico))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Unite(x, enrico))\nforall x (Nutty(x) -> Xcviii(x))\nPiece(randolf, row) -> not Fervid(row)\nforall x (Tallish(x) and not Unite(x, randolf) -> not Flagitious(x))\nforall x (Robe(x, row) and not Robe(row, randolf) -> Piece(row, randolf))\n\nPiece(row, enrico)\n\ntherefore Piece(row, enrico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The maryjo condense the tharen. The maryjo is unbounded. The maryjo is not erectile. The maryjo does not like the tharen. The maryjo fulminate the rozalie. The tharen does not chase the rozalie. The tharen fulminate the rozalie. The rozalie condense the maryjo. The rozalie condense the tharen. The rozalie is erectile. If someone condense the rozalie then the rozalie is unbounded. If the rozalie is altruistic and the rozalie condense the maryjo then the maryjo rumple the tharen. If someone rumple the tharen then the tharen does not like the rozalie. If someone is unbounded then they chase the rozalie. Rough people are erectile. If the tharen fulminate the maryjo then the maryjo is not obsessed. If someone is unbounded and they do not chase the tharen then they are not goofy. If someone rumple the maryjo and the maryjo does not visit the tharen then the maryjo fulminate the tharen. The maryjo fulminate the tharen.", "logic": "\nCondense(maryjo, tharen)\nUnbounded(maryjo)\nnot Erectile(maryjo)\nnot Fulminate(maryjo, tharen)\nFulminate(maryjo, rozalie)\nnot Condense(tharen, rozalie)\nFulminate(tharen, rozalie)\nCondense(rozalie, maryjo)\nCondense(rozalie, tharen)\nErectile(rozalie)\nforall x (Condense(x, rozalie) -> Unbounded(rozalie))\nAltruistic(rozalie) and Condense(rozalie, maryjo) -> Rumple(maryjo, tharen)\nforall x (Rumple(x, tharen) -> not Fulminate(tharen, rozalie))\nforall x (Unbounded(x) -> Condense(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Altruistic(x) -> Erectile(x))\nFulminate(tharen, maryjo) -> not Obsessed(maryjo)\nforall x (Unbounded(x) and not Condense(x, tharen) -> not Goofy(x))\nforall x (Rumple(x, maryjo) and not Rumple(maryjo, tharen) -> Fulminate(maryjo, tharen))\n\nFulminate(maryjo, tharen)\n\ntherefore not Fulminate(maryjo, tharen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The bobine heterodyne the samuella. The bobine is oldish. The bobine is not whiny. The bobine does not like the samuella. The bobine damp the yoshi. The samuella does not chase the yoshi. The samuella damp the yoshi. The yoshi heterodyne the bobine. The yoshi heterodyne the samuella. The yoshi is whiny. If someone heterodyne the yoshi then the yoshi is oldish. If the yoshi is execrable and the yoshi heterodyne the bobine then the bobine pivot the samuella. If someone pivot the samuella then the samuella does not like the yoshi. If someone is oldish then they chase the yoshi. Rough people are whiny. If the samuella damp the bobine then the bobine is not neckless. If someone is oldish and they do not chase the samuella then they are not mystic. If someone pivot the bobine and the bobine does not visit the samuella then the bobine damp the samuella. The bobine heterodyne the yoshi.", "logic": "\nHeterodyne(bobine, samuella)\nOldish(bobine)\nnot Whiny(bobine)\nnot Damp(bobine, samuella)\nDamp(bobine, yoshi)\nnot Heterodyne(samuella, yoshi)\nDamp(samuella, yoshi)\nHeterodyne(yoshi, bobine)\nHeterodyne(yoshi, samuella)\nWhiny(yoshi)\nforall x (Heterodyne(x, yoshi) -> Oldish(yoshi))\nExecrable(yoshi) and Heterodyne(yoshi, bobine) -> Pivot(bobine, samuella)\nforall x (Pivot(x, samuella) -> not Damp(samuella, yoshi))\nforall x (Oldish(x) -> Heterodyne(x, yoshi))\nforall x (Execrable(x) -> Whiny(x))\nDamp(samuella, bobine) -> not Neckless(bobine)\nforall x (Oldish(x) and not Heterodyne(x, samuella) -> not Mystic(x))\nforall x (Pivot(x, bobine) and not Pivot(bobine, samuella) -> Damp(bobine, samuella))\n\nHeterodyne(bobine, yoshi)\n\nOldish(bobine) and forall x (Oldish(x) -> Heterodyne(x, yoshi)) -> therefore Heterodyne(bobine, yoshi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The talbot extract the tanney. The talbot is mazy. The talbot is not honored. The talbot does not like the tanney. The talbot decamp the krista. The tanney does not chase the krista. The tanney decamp the krista. The krista extract the talbot. The krista extract the tanney. The krista is honored. If someone extract the krista then the krista is mazy. If the krista is modulated and the krista extract the talbot then the talbot requite the tanney. If someone requite the tanney then the tanney does not like the krista. If someone is mazy then they chase the krista. Rough people are honored. If the tanney decamp the talbot then the talbot is not abstinent. If someone is mazy and they do not chase the tanney then they are not corneal. If someone requite the talbot and the talbot does not visit the tanney then the talbot decamp the tanney. The talbot does not chase the krista.", "logic": "\nExtract(talbot, tanney)\nMazy(talbot)\nnot Honored(talbot)\nnot Decamp(talbot, tanney)\nDecamp(talbot, krista)\nnot Extract(tanney, krista)\nDecamp(tanney, krista)\nExtract(krista, talbot)\nExtract(krista, tanney)\nHonored(krista)\nforall x (Extract(x, krista) -> Mazy(krista))\nModulated(krista) and Extract(krista, talbot) -> Requite(talbot, tanney)\nforall x (Requite(x, tanney) -> not Decamp(tanney, krista))\nforall x (Mazy(x) -> Extract(x, krista))\nforall x (Modulated(x) -> Honored(x))\nDecamp(tanney, talbot) -> not Abstinent(talbot)\nforall x (Mazy(x) and not Extract(x, tanney) -> not Corneal(x))\nforall x (Requite(x, talbot) and not Requite(talbot, tanney) -> Decamp(talbot, tanney))\n\nnot Extract(talbot, krista)\n\nMazy(talbot) and forall x (Mazy(x) -> Extract(x, krista)) -> therefore Extract(talbot, krista)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The annelise chuck the dmitri. The annelise is unread. The annelise is not fifteen. The annelise does not like the dmitri. The annelise flurry the alvinia. The dmitri does not chase the alvinia. The dmitri flurry the alvinia. The alvinia chuck the annelise. The alvinia chuck the dmitri. The alvinia is fifteen. If someone chuck the alvinia then the alvinia is unread. If the alvinia is syphilitic and the alvinia chuck the annelise then the annelise shear the dmitri. If someone shear the dmitri then the dmitri does not like the alvinia. If someone is unread then they chase the alvinia. Rough people are fifteen. If the dmitri flurry the annelise then the annelise is not spirituous. If someone is unread and they do not chase the dmitri then they are not fatherless. If someone shear the annelise and the annelise does not visit the dmitri then the annelise flurry the dmitri. The alvinia is unread.", "logic": "\nChuck(annelise, dmitri)\nUnread(annelise)\nnot Fifteen(annelise)\nnot Flurry(annelise, dmitri)\nFlurry(annelise, alvinia)\nnot Chuck(dmitri, alvinia)\nFlurry(dmitri, alvinia)\nChuck(alvinia, annelise)\nChuck(alvinia, dmitri)\nFifteen(alvinia)\nforall x (Chuck(x, alvinia) -> Unread(alvinia))\nSyphilitic(alvinia) and Chuck(alvinia, annelise) -> Shear(annelise, dmitri)\nforall x (Shear(x, dmitri) -> not Flurry(dmitri, alvinia))\nforall x (Unread(x) -> Chuck(x, alvinia))\nforall x (Syphilitic(x) -> Fifteen(x))\nFlurry(dmitri, annelise) -> not Spirituous(annelise)\nforall x (Unread(x) and not Chuck(x, dmitri) -> not Fatherless(x))\nforall x (Shear(x, annelise) and not Shear(annelise, dmitri) -> Flurry(annelise, dmitri))\n\nUnread(alvinia)\n\nUnread(annelise) and forall x (Unread(x) -> Chuck(x, alvinia)) -> therefore Chuck(annelise, alvinia) Chuck(annelise, alvinia) and forall x (Chuck(x, alvinia) -> Unread(alvinia)) -> therefore Unread(alvinia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The lemmy citify the kariotta. The lemmy is heard. The lemmy is not unrhymed. The lemmy does not like the kariotta. The lemmy snag the tatiania. The kariotta does not chase the tatiania. The kariotta snag the tatiania. The tatiania citify the lemmy. The tatiania citify the kariotta. The tatiania is unrhymed. If someone citify the tatiania then the tatiania is heard. If the tatiania is inguinal and the tatiania citify the lemmy then the lemmy usurp the kariotta. If someone usurp the kariotta then the kariotta does not like the tatiania. If someone is heard then they chase the tatiania. Rough people are unrhymed. If the kariotta snag the lemmy then the lemmy is not unitarian. If someone is heard and they do not chase the kariotta then they are not liege. If someone usurp the lemmy and the lemmy does not visit the kariotta then the lemmy snag the kariotta. The tatiania is not heard.", "logic": "\nCitify(lemmy, kariotta)\nHeard(lemmy)\nnot Unrhymed(lemmy)\nnot Snag(lemmy, kariotta)\nSnag(lemmy, tatiania)\nnot Citify(kariotta, tatiania)\nSnag(kariotta, tatiania)\nCitify(tatiania, lemmy)\nCitify(tatiania, kariotta)\nUnrhymed(tatiania)\nforall x (Citify(x, tatiania) -> Heard(tatiania))\nInguinal(tatiania) and Citify(tatiania, lemmy) -> Usurp(lemmy, kariotta)\nforall x (Usurp(x, kariotta) -> not Snag(kariotta, tatiania))\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Citify(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\nSnag(kariotta, lemmy) -> not Unitarian(lemmy)\nforall x (Heard(x) and not Citify(x, kariotta) -> not Liege(x))\nforall x (Usurp(x, lemmy) and not Usurp(lemmy, kariotta) -> Snag(lemmy, kariotta))\n\nnot Heard(tatiania)\n\nHeard(lemmy) and forall x (Heard(x) -> Citify(x, tatiania)) -> therefore Citify(lemmy, tatiania) Citify(lemmy, tatiania) and forall x (Citify(x, tatiania) -> Heard(tatiania)) -> therefore Heard(tatiania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The graehme trample the idette. The graehme is ergotic. The graehme is not octal. The graehme does not like the idette. The graehme jeopardize the stu. The idette does not chase the stu. The idette jeopardize the stu. The stu trample the graehme. The stu trample the idette. The stu is octal. If someone trample the stu then the stu is ergotic. If the stu is lxiii and the stu trample the graehme then the graehme batter the idette. If someone batter the idette then the idette does not like the stu. If someone is ergotic then they chase the stu. Rough people are octal. If the idette jeopardize the graehme then the graehme is not disfigured. If someone is ergotic and they do not chase the idette then they are not avoidable. If someone batter the graehme and the graehme does not visit the idette then the graehme jeopardize the idette. The stu trample the stu.", "logic": "\nTrample(graehme, idette)\nErgotic(graehme)\nnot Octal(graehme)\nnot Jeopardize(graehme, idette)\nJeopardize(graehme, stu)\nnot Trample(idette, stu)\nJeopardize(idette, stu)\nTrample(stu, graehme)\nTrample(stu, idette)\nOctal(stu)\nforall x (Trample(x, stu) -> Ergotic(stu))\nLxiii(stu) and Trample(stu, graehme) -> Batter(graehme, idette)\nforall x (Batter(x, idette) -> not Jeopardize(idette, stu))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) -> Trample(x, stu))\nforall x (Lxiii(x) -> Octal(x))\nJeopardize(idette, graehme) -> not Disfigured(graehme)\nforall x (Ergotic(x) and not Trample(x, idette) -> not Avoidable(x))\nforall x (Batter(x, graehme) and not Batter(graehme, idette) -> Jeopardize(graehme, idette))\n\nTrample(stu, stu)\n\nErgotic(graehme) and forall x (Ergotic(x) -> Trample(x, stu)) -> therefore Trample(graehme, stu) Trample(graehme, stu) and forall x (Trample(x, stu) -> Ergotic(stu)) -> therefore Ergotic(stu) Ergotic(stu) and forall x (Ergotic(x) -> Trample(x, stu)) -> therefore Trample(stu, stu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The benn verbify the matthaeus. The benn is serpentine. The benn is not dualistic. The benn does not like the matthaeus. The benn identify the inger. The matthaeus does not chase the inger. The matthaeus identify the inger. The inger verbify the benn. The inger verbify the matthaeus. The inger is dualistic. If someone verbify the inger then the inger is serpentine. If the inger is asteroid and the inger verbify the benn then the benn agnize the matthaeus. If someone agnize the matthaeus then the matthaeus does not like the inger. If someone is serpentine then they chase the inger. Rough people are dualistic. If the matthaeus identify the benn then the benn is not unfitting. If someone is serpentine and they do not chase the matthaeus then they are not insightful. If someone agnize the benn and the benn does not visit the matthaeus then the benn identify the matthaeus. The inger does not chase the inger.", "logic": "\nVerbify(benn, matthaeus)\nSerpentine(benn)\nnot Dualistic(benn)\nnot Identify(benn, matthaeus)\nIdentify(benn, inger)\nnot Verbify(matthaeus, inger)\nIdentify(matthaeus, inger)\nVerbify(inger, benn)\nVerbify(inger, matthaeus)\nDualistic(inger)\nforall x (Verbify(x, inger) -> Serpentine(inger))\nAsteroid(inger) and Verbify(inger, benn) -> Agnize(benn, matthaeus)\nforall x (Agnize(x, matthaeus) -> not Identify(matthaeus, inger))\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Verbify(x, inger))\nforall x (Asteroid(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nIdentify(matthaeus, benn) -> not Unfitting(benn)\nforall x (Serpentine(x) and not Verbify(x, matthaeus) -> not Insightful(x))\nforall x (Agnize(x, benn) and not Agnize(benn, matthaeus) -> Identify(benn, matthaeus))\n\nnot Verbify(inger, inger)\n\nSerpentine(benn) and forall x (Serpentine(x) -> Verbify(x, inger)) -> therefore Verbify(benn, inger) Verbify(benn, inger) and forall x (Verbify(x, inger) -> Serpentine(inger)) -> therefore Serpentine(inger) Serpentine(inger) and forall x (Serpentine(x) -> Verbify(x, inger)) -> therefore Verbify(inger, inger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The sullivan scar the katrine. The sullivan is continued. The sullivan is not loco. The sullivan does not like the katrine. The sullivan water the valida. The katrine does not chase the valida. The katrine water the valida. The valida scar the sullivan. The valida scar the katrine. The valida is loco. If someone scar the valida then the valida is continued. If the valida is serrulate and the valida scar the sullivan then the sullivan misspend the katrine. If someone misspend the katrine then the katrine does not like the valida. If someone is continued then they chase the valida. Rough people are loco. If the katrine water the sullivan then the sullivan is not cumbersome. If someone is continued and they do not chase the katrine then they are not beholden. If someone misspend the sullivan and the sullivan does not visit the katrine then the sullivan water the katrine. The katrine is not loco.", "logic": "\nScar(sullivan, katrine)\nContinued(sullivan)\nnot Loco(sullivan)\nnot Water(sullivan, katrine)\nWater(sullivan, valida)\nnot Scar(katrine, valida)\nWater(katrine, valida)\nScar(valida, sullivan)\nScar(valida, katrine)\nLoco(valida)\nforall x (Scar(x, valida) -> Continued(valida))\nSerrulate(valida) and Scar(valida, sullivan) -> Misspend(sullivan, katrine)\nforall x (Misspend(x, katrine) -> not Water(katrine, valida))\nforall x (Continued(x) -> Scar(x, valida))\nforall x (Serrulate(x) -> Loco(x))\nWater(katrine, sullivan) -> not Cumbersome(sullivan)\nforall x (Continued(x) and not Scar(x, katrine) -> not Beholden(x))\nforall x (Misspend(x, sullivan) and not Misspend(sullivan, katrine) -> Water(sullivan, katrine))\n\nnot Loco(katrine)\n\nforall x (Serrulate(x) -> Loco(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The marya purpurate the haywood. The marya is xlii. The marya is not argive. The marya does not like the haywood. The marya fascinate the corena. The haywood does not chase the corena. The haywood fascinate the corena. The corena purpurate the marya. The corena purpurate the haywood. The corena is argive. If someone purpurate the corena then the corena is xlii. If the corena is gettable and the corena purpurate the marya then the marya beaver the haywood. If someone beaver the haywood then the haywood does not like the corena. If someone is xlii then they chase the corena. Rough people are argive. If the haywood fascinate the marya then the marya is not trancelike. If someone is xlii and they do not chase the haywood then they are not feminine. If someone beaver the marya and the marya does not visit the haywood then the marya fascinate the haywood. The marya beaver the haywood.", "logic": "\nPurpurate(marya, haywood)\nXlii(marya)\nnot Argive(marya)\nnot Fascinate(marya, haywood)\nFascinate(marya, corena)\nnot Purpurate(haywood, corena)\nFascinate(haywood, corena)\nPurpurate(corena, marya)\nPurpurate(corena, haywood)\nArgive(corena)\nforall x (Purpurate(x, corena) -> Xlii(corena))\nGettable(corena) and Purpurate(corena, marya) -> Beaver(marya, haywood)\nforall x (Beaver(x, haywood) -> not Fascinate(haywood, corena))\nforall x (Xlii(x) -> Purpurate(x, corena))\nforall x (Gettable(x) -> Argive(x))\nFascinate(haywood, marya) -> not Trancelike(marya)\nforall x (Xlii(x) and not Purpurate(x, haywood) -> not Feminine(x))\nforall x (Beaver(x, marya) and not Beaver(marya, haywood) -> Fascinate(marya, haywood))\n\nBeaver(marya, haywood)\n\nGettable(corena) and Purpurate(corena, marya) -> Beaver(marya, haywood) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The calla blunt the gerard. The calla is unrhymed. The calla is not lopsided. The calla does not like the gerard. The calla throng the aubree. The gerard does not chase the aubree. The gerard throng the aubree. The aubree blunt the calla. The aubree blunt the gerard. The aubree is lopsided. If someone blunt the aubree then the aubree is unrhymed. If the aubree is blank and the aubree blunt the calla then the calla syncretize the gerard. If someone syncretize the gerard then the gerard does not like the aubree. If someone is unrhymed then they chase the aubree. Rough people are lopsided. If the gerard throng the calla then the calla is not unlaced. If someone is unrhymed and they do not chase the gerard then they are not prankish. If someone syncretize the calla and the calla does not visit the gerard then the calla throng the gerard. The calla is not prankish.", "logic": "\nBlunt(calla, gerard)\nUnrhymed(calla)\nnot Lopsided(calla)\nnot Throng(calla, gerard)\nThrong(calla, aubree)\nnot Blunt(gerard, aubree)\nThrong(gerard, aubree)\nBlunt(aubree, calla)\nBlunt(aubree, gerard)\nLopsided(aubree)\nforall x (Blunt(x, aubree) -> Unrhymed(aubree))\nBlank(aubree) and Blunt(aubree, calla) -> Syncretize(calla, gerard)\nforall x (Syncretize(x, gerard) -> not Throng(gerard, aubree))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) -> Blunt(x, aubree))\nforall x (Blank(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nThrong(gerard, calla) -> not Unlaced(calla)\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and not Blunt(x, gerard) -> not Prankish(x))\nforall x (Syncretize(x, calla) and not Syncretize(calla, gerard) -> Throng(calla, gerard))\n\nnot Prankish(calla)\n\nnot Prankish(calla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The roby step the diannne. The roby is bouldered. The roby is not unsweet. The roby does not like the diannne. The roby reverse the warden. The diannne does not chase the warden. The diannne reverse the warden. The warden step the roby. The warden step the diannne. The warden is unsweet. If someone step the warden then the warden is bouldered. If the warden is malaysian and the warden step the roby then the roby dampen the diannne. If someone dampen the diannne then the diannne does not like the warden. If someone is bouldered then they chase the warden. Rough people are unsweet. If the diannne reverse the roby then the roby is not debatable. If someone is bouldered and they do not chase the diannne then they are not deviant. If someone dampen the roby and the roby does not visit the diannne then the roby reverse the diannne. The warden reverse the diannne.", "logic": "\nStep(roby, diannne)\nBouldered(roby)\nnot Unsweet(roby)\nnot Reverse(roby, diannne)\nReverse(roby, warden)\nnot Step(diannne, warden)\nReverse(diannne, warden)\nStep(warden, roby)\nStep(warden, diannne)\nUnsweet(warden)\nforall x (Step(x, warden) -> Bouldered(warden))\nMalaysian(warden) and Step(warden, roby) -> Dampen(roby, diannne)\nforall x (Dampen(x, diannne) -> not Reverse(diannne, warden))\nforall x (Bouldered(x) -> Step(x, warden))\nforall x (Malaysian(x) -> Unsweet(x))\nReverse(diannne, roby) -> not Debatable(roby)\nforall x (Bouldered(x) and not Step(x, diannne) -> not Deviant(x))\nforall x (Dampen(x, roby) and not Dampen(roby, diannne) -> Reverse(roby, diannne))\n\nReverse(warden, diannne)\n\nReverse(warden, diannne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The bruno outpace the lynde. The bruno is unpainted. The bruno is not uncoupled. The bruno does not like the lynde. The bruno hiccough the chrissa. The lynde does not chase the chrissa. The lynde hiccough the chrissa. The chrissa outpace the bruno. The chrissa outpace the lynde. The chrissa is uncoupled. If someone outpace the chrissa then the chrissa is unpainted. If the chrissa is nonstop and the chrissa outpace the bruno then the bruno iodinate the lynde. If someone iodinate the lynde then the lynde does not like the chrissa. If someone is unpainted then they chase the chrissa. Rough people are uncoupled. If the lynde hiccough the bruno then the bruno is not disorderly. If someone is unpainted and they do not chase the lynde then they are not laurelled. If someone iodinate the bruno and the bruno does not visit the lynde then the bruno hiccough the lynde. The lynde does not visit the bruno.", "logic": "\nOutpace(bruno, lynde)\nUnpainted(bruno)\nnot Uncoupled(bruno)\nnot Hiccough(bruno, lynde)\nHiccough(bruno, chrissa)\nnot Outpace(lynde, chrissa)\nHiccough(lynde, chrissa)\nOutpace(chrissa, bruno)\nOutpace(chrissa, lynde)\nUncoupled(chrissa)\nforall x (Outpace(x, chrissa) -> Unpainted(chrissa))\nNonstop(chrissa) and Outpace(chrissa, bruno) -> Iodinate(bruno, lynde)\nforall x (Iodinate(x, lynde) -> not Hiccough(lynde, chrissa))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Outpace(x, chrissa))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) -> Uncoupled(x))\nHiccough(lynde, bruno) -> not Disorderly(bruno)\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and not Outpace(x, lynde) -> not Laurelled(x))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, bruno) and not Iodinate(bruno, lynde) -> Hiccough(bruno, lynde))\n\nnot Iodinate(lynde, bruno)\n\nnot Iodinate(lynde, bruno) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The dominica reproach the loralie. The dominica is cruel. The dominica is not pigheaded. The dominica does not like the loralie. The dominica pall the hewie. The loralie does not chase the hewie. The loralie pall the hewie. The hewie reproach the dominica. The hewie reproach the loralie. The hewie is pigheaded. If someone reproach the hewie then the hewie is cruel. If the hewie is acid and the hewie reproach the dominica then the dominica lash the loralie. If someone lash the loralie then the loralie does not like the hewie. If someone is cruel then they chase the hewie. Rough people are pigheaded. If the loralie pall the dominica then the dominica is not subsidiary. If someone is cruel and they do not chase the loralie then they are not argentous. If someone lash the dominica and the dominica does not visit the loralie then the dominica pall the loralie. The loralie is acid.", "logic": "\nReproach(dominica, loralie)\nCruel(dominica)\nnot Pigheaded(dominica)\nnot Pall(dominica, loralie)\nPall(dominica, hewie)\nnot Reproach(loralie, hewie)\nPall(loralie, hewie)\nReproach(hewie, dominica)\nReproach(hewie, loralie)\nPigheaded(hewie)\nforall x (Reproach(x, hewie) -> Cruel(hewie))\nAcid(hewie) and Reproach(hewie, dominica) -> Lash(dominica, loralie)\nforall x (Lash(x, loralie) -> not Pall(loralie, hewie))\nforall x (Cruel(x) -> Reproach(x, hewie))\nforall x (Acid(x) -> Pigheaded(x))\nPall(loralie, dominica) -> not Subsidiary(dominica)\nforall x (Cruel(x) and not Reproach(x, loralie) -> not Argentous(x))\nforall x (Lash(x, dominica) and not Lash(dominica, loralie) -> Pall(dominica, loralie))\n\nAcid(loralie)\n\nAcid(loralie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The cecilia sough the mollie. The cecilia is sixteen. The cecilia is not permutable. The cecilia does not like the mollie. The cecilia westernize the laverne. The mollie does not chase the laverne. The mollie westernize the laverne. The laverne sough the cecilia. The laverne sough the mollie. The laverne is permutable. If someone sough the laverne then the laverne is sixteen. If the laverne is derisive and the laverne sough the cecilia then the cecilia breast the mollie. If someone breast the mollie then the mollie does not like the laverne. If someone is sixteen then they chase the laverne. Rough people are permutable. If the mollie westernize the cecilia then the cecilia is not cervine. If someone is sixteen and they do not chase the mollie then they are not reassured. If someone breast the cecilia and the cecilia does not visit the mollie then the cecilia westernize the mollie. The cecilia does not like the cecilia.", "logic": "\nSough(cecilia, mollie)\nSixteen(cecilia)\nnot Permutable(cecilia)\nnot Westernize(cecilia, mollie)\nWesternize(cecilia, laverne)\nnot Sough(mollie, laverne)\nWesternize(mollie, laverne)\nSough(laverne, cecilia)\nSough(laverne, mollie)\nPermutable(laverne)\nforall x (Sough(x, laverne) -> Sixteen(laverne))\nDerisive(laverne) and Sough(laverne, cecilia) -> Breast(cecilia, mollie)\nforall x (Breast(x, mollie) -> not Westernize(mollie, laverne))\nforall x (Sixteen(x) -> Sough(x, laverne))\nforall x (Derisive(x) -> Permutable(x))\nWesternize(mollie, cecilia) -> not Cervine(cecilia)\nforall x (Sixteen(x) and not Sough(x, mollie) -> not Reassured(x))\nforall x (Breast(x, cecilia) and not Breast(cecilia, mollie) -> Westernize(cecilia, mollie))\n\nnot Westernize(cecilia, cecilia)\n\nnot Westernize(cecilia, cecilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The christin localise the arabele. The christin is bedrid. The christin is not widespread. The christin does not like the arabele. The christin situate the spense. The arabele does not chase the spense. The arabele situate the spense. The spense localise the christin. The spense localise the arabele. The spense is widespread. If someone localise the spense then the spense is bedrid. If the spense is edifying and the spense localise the christin then the christin gray the arabele. If someone gray the arabele then the arabele does not like the spense. If someone is bedrid then they chase the spense. Rough people are widespread. If the arabele situate the christin then the christin is not aramean. If someone is bedrid and they do not chase the arabele then they are not indigent. If someone gray the christin and the christin does not visit the arabele then the christin situate the arabele. The spense is indigent.", "logic": "\nLocalise(christin, arabele)\nBedrid(christin)\nnot Widespread(christin)\nnot Situate(christin, arabele)\nSituate(christin, spense)\nnot Localise(arabele, spense)\nSituate(arabele, spense)\nLocalise(spense, christin)\nLocalise(spense, arabele)\nWidespread(spense)\nforall x (Localise(x, spense) -> Bedrid(spense))\nEdifying(spense) and Localise(spense, christin) -> Gray(christin, arabele)\nforall x (Gray(x, arabele) -> not Situate(arabele, spense))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) -> Localise(x, spense))\nforall x (Edifying(x) -> Widespread(x))\nSituate(arabele, christin) -> not Aramean(christin)\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and not Localise(x, arabele) -> not Indigent(x))\nforall x (Gray(x, christin) and not Gray(christin, arabele) -> Situate(christin, arabele))\n\nIndigent(spense)\n\nIndigent(spense) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-835"} {"premises": "The darya assort the fred. The fred assort the darya. The lowell poetize the alysa. The alysa poetize the lowell. If the alysa assort the lowell and the lowell nurture the fred then the alysa poetize the lowell. The alysa poetize the lowell.", "logic": "\nAssort(darya, fred)\nAssort(fred, darya)\nPoetize(lowell, alysa)\nPoetize(alysa, lowell)\nAssort(alysa, lowell) and Nurture(lowell, fred) -> Poetize(alysa, lowell)\n\nPoetize(alysa, lowell)\n\ntherefore Poetize(alysa, lowell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3463"} {"premises": "The lyndon reinforce the georg. The georg reinforce the lyndon. The hershel ovenbake the felita. The felita ovenbake the hershel. If the felita reinforce the hershel and the hershel defrock the georg then the felita ovenbake the hershel. The hershel does not like the felita.", "logic": "\nReinforce(lyndon, georg)\nReinforce(georg, lyndon)\nOvenbake(hershel, felita)\nOvenbake(felita, hershel)\nReinforce(felita, hershel) and Defrock(hershel, georg) -> Ovenbake(felita, hershel)\n\nnot Ovenbake(hershel, felita)\n\ntherefore Ovenbake(hershel, felita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3463"} {"premises": "The sephira waggle the penrod. The penrod waggle the sephira. The lindsay position the merna. The merna position the lindsay. If the merna waggle the lindsay and the lindsay profane the penrod then the merna position the lindsay. The sephira does not see the lindsay.", "logic": "\nWaggle(sephira, penrod)\nWaggle(penrod, sephira)\nPosition(lindsay, merna)\nPosition(merna, lindsay)\nWaggle(merna, lindsay) and Profane(lindsay, penrod) -> Position(merna, lindsay)\n\nnot Profane(sephira, lindsay)\n\nnot Profane(sephira, lindsay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3463"} {"premises": "The charlotta disfavor the jermain. The jermain disfavor the charlotta. The rozanne fray the maible. The maible fray the rozanne. If the maible disfavor the rozanne and the rozanne change the jermain then the maible fray the rozanne. The charlotta disfavor the rozanne.", "logic": "\nDisfavor(charlotta, jermain)\nDisfavor(jermain, charlotta)\nFray(rozanne, maible)\nFray(maible, rozanne)\nDisfavor(maible, rozanne) and Change(rozanne, jermain) -> Fray(maible, rozanne)\n\nDisfavor(charlotta, rozanne)\n\nDisfavor(charlotta, rozanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3463"} {"premises": "Skipp is skinny. Ishmael is inhumed. Ishmael is skinny. Marga is cuprous. Sylvan is nefarious. Sylvan is not amorphous. Sylvan is unforeseen. Kind people are nefarious. If someone is inhumed then they are nefarious. If someone is inhumed then they are nefarious. All nefarious people are skinny. If Marga is not nefarious and Marga is not inhumed then Marga is eighth. If someone is inhumed and not skinny then they are eighth. Red people are eighth. If someone is skinny then they are not eighth. Ishmael is skinny.", "logic": "\nSkinny(skipp)\nInhumed(ishmael)\nSkinny(ishmael)\nCuprous(marga)\nNefarious(sylvan)\nnot Amorphous(sylvan)\nUnforeseen(sylvan)\nforall x (Cuprous(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nforall x (Nefarious(x) -> Skinny(x))\nnot Nefarious(marga) and not Inhumed(marga) -> Eighth(marga)\nforall x (Inhumed(x) and not Skinny(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Amorphous(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Skinny(x) -> not Eighth(x))\n\nSkinny(ishmael)\n\ntherefore Skinny(ishmael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Devi is caffeinic. Rina is basal. Rina is caffeinic. Kaster is hardbacked. Yevette is tight. Yevette is not jewelled. Yevette is slashed. Kind people are tight. If someone is basal then they are tight. If someone is basal then they are tight. All tight people are caffeinic. If Kaster is not tight and Kaster is not basal then Kaster is toxicant. If someone is basal and not caffeinic then they are toxicant. Red people are toxicant. If someone is caffeinic then they are not toxicant. Rina is not basal.", "logic": "\nCaffeinic(devi)\nBasal(rina)\nCaffeinic(rina)\nHardbacked(kaster)\nTight(yevette)\nnot Jewelled(yevette)\nSlashed(yevette)\nforall x (Hardbacked(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Caffeinic(x))\nnot Tight(kaster) and not Basal(kaster) -> Toxicant(kaster)\nforall x (Basal(x) and not Caffeinic(x) -> Toxicant(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Toxicant(x))\nforall x (Caffeinic(x) -> not Toxicant(x))\n\nnot Basal(rina)\n\ntherefore Basal(rina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Reeta is chewy. Sinclair is pimpled. Sinclair is chewy. Tybie is unfit. Harv is unrevealed. Harv is not gigantic. Harv is revolting. Kind people are unrevealed. If someone is pimpled then they are unrevealed. If someone is pimpled then they are unrevealed. All unrevealed people are chewy. If Tybie is not unrevealed and Tybie is not pimpled then Tybie is tailless. If someone is pimpled and not chewy then they are tailless. Red people are tailless. If someone is chewy then they are not tailless. Harv is chewy.", "logic": "\nChewy(reeta)\nPimpled(sinclair)\nChewy(sinclair)\nUnfit(tybie)\nUnrevealed(harv)\nnot Gigantic(harv)\nRevolting(harv)\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Chewy(x))\nnot Unrevealed(tybie) and not Pimpled(tybie) -> Tailless(tybie)\nforall x (Pimpled(x) and not Chewy(x) -> Tailless(x))\nforall x (Gigantic(x) -> Tailless(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) -> not Tailless(x))\n\nChewy(harv)\n\nUnrevealed(harv) and forall x (Unrevealed(x) -> Chewy(x)) -> therefore Chewy(harv)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Jefferey is goalless. Federica is tight. Federica is goalless. Geri is smoky. Nealon is rakish. Nealon is not unique. Nealon is wily. Kind people are rakish. If someone is tight then they are rakish. If someone is tight then they are rakish. All rakish people are goalless. If Geri is not rakish and Geri is not tight then Geri is bandaged. If someone is tight and not goalless then they are bandaged. Red people are bandaged. If someone is goalless then they are not bandaged. Jefferey is bandaged.", "logic": "\nGoalless(jefferey)\nTight(federica)\nGoalless(federica)\nSmoky(geri)\nRakish(nealon)\nnot Unique(nealon)\nWily(nealon)\nforall x (Smoky(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Rakish(x))\nforall x (Rakish(x) -> Goalless(x))\nnot Rakish(geri) and not Tight(geri) -> Bandaged(geri)\nforall x (Tight(x) and not Goalless(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Unique(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) -> not Bandaged(x))\n\nBandaged(jefferey)\n\nGoalless(jefferey) and forall x (Goalless(x) -> not Bandaged(x)) -> therefore not Bandaged(jefferey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Mortimer is ludicrous. Mariya is panamanian. Mariya is ludicrous. Koo is atactic. Ilise is winy. Ilise is not glace. Ilise is blamable. Kind people are winy. If someone is panamanian then they are winy. If someone is panamanian then they are winy. All winy people are ludicrous. If Koo is not winy and Koo is not panamanian then Koo is uncrowded. If someone is panamanian and not ludicrous then they are uncrowded. Red people are uncrowded. If someone is ludicrous then they are not uncrowded. Ilise is not uncrowded.", "logic": "\nLudicrous(mortimer)\nPanamanian(mariya)\nLudicrous(mariya)\nAtactic(koo)\nWiny(ilise)\nnot Glace(ilise)\nBlamable(ilise)\nforall x (Atactic(x) -> Winy(x))\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Winy(x))\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Winy(x))\nforall x (Winy(x) -> Ludicrous(x))\nnot Winy(koo) and not Panamanian(koo) -> Uncrowded(koo)\nforall x (Panamanian(x) and not Ludicrous(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\nforall x (Ludicrous(x) -> not Uncrowded(x))\n\nnot Uncrowded(ilise)\n\nWiny(ilise) and forall x (Winy(x) -> Ludicrous(x)) -> therefore Ludicrous(ilise) Ludicrous(ilise) and forall x (Ludicrous(x) -> not Uncrowded(x)) -> therefore not Uncrowded(ilise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Clayborn is forged. Barde is casebook. Barde is forged. Ugo is biomedical. Augusta is baptized. Augusta is not fanciful. Augusta is auricular. Kind people are baptized. If someone is casebook then they are baptized. If someone is casebook then they are baptized. All baptized people are forged. If Ugo is not baptized and Ugo is not casebook then Ugo is bibbed. If someone is casebook and not forged then they are bibbed. Red people are bibbed. If someone is forged then they are not bibbed. Ugo is not forged.", "logic": "\nForged(clayborn)\nCasebook(barde)\nForged(barde)\nBiomedical(ugo)\nBaptized(augusta)\nnot Fanciful(augusta)\nAuricular(augusta)\nforall x (Biomedical(x) -> Baptized(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) -> Baptized(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) -> Baptized(x))\nforall x (Baptized(x) -> Forged(x))\nnot Baptized(ugo) and not Casebook(ugo) -> Bibbed(ugo)\nforall x (Casebook(x) and not Forged(x) -> Bibbed(x))\nforall x (Fanciful(x) -> Bibbed(x))\nforall x (Forged(x) -> not Bibbed(x))\n\nnot Forged(ugo)\n\nBiomedical(ugo) and forall x (Biomedical(x) -> Baptized(x)) -> therefore Baptized(ugo) Baptized(ugo) and forall x (Baptized(x) -> Forged(x)) -> therefore Forged(ugo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Maryjo is unmanned. Davey is assentient. Davey is unmanned. Gilberto is inarguable. Gearard is shabby. Gearard is not ohmic. Gearard is celestial. Kind people are shabby. If someone is assentient then they are shabby. If someone is assentient then they are shabby. All shabby people are unmanned. If Gilberto is not shabby and Gilberto is not assentient then Gilberto is anguished. If someone is assentient and not unmanned then they are anguished. Red people are anguished. If someone is unmanned then they are not anguished. Gilberto is not anguished.", "logic": "\nUnmanned(maryjo)\nAssentient(davey)\nUnmanned(davey)\nInarguable(gilberto)\nShabby(gearard)\nnot Ohmic(gearard)\nCelestial(gearard)\nforall x (Inarguable(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Assentient(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Assentient(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Shabby(x) -> Unmanned(x))\nnot Shabby(gilberto) and not Assentient(gilberto) -> Anguished(gilberto)\nforall x (Assentient(x) and not Unmanned(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Ohmic(x) -> Anguished(x))\nforall x (Unmanned(x) -> not Anguished(x))\n\nnot Anguished(gilberto)\n\nInarguable(gilberto) and forall x (Inarguable(x) -> Shabby(x)) -> therefore Shabby(gilberto) Shabby(gilberto) and forall x (Shabby(x) -> Unmanned(x)) -> therefore Unmanned(gilberto) Unmanned(gilberto) and forall x (Unmanned(x) -> not Anguished(x)) -> therefore not Anguished(gilberto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Michal is argentous. Adrien is interior. Adrien is argentous. Adelina is aneurismal. Willette is demotic. Willette is not murky. Willette is xenogeneic. Kind people are demotic. If someone is interior then they are demotic. If someone is interior then they are demotic. All demotic people are argentous. If Adelina is not demotic and Adelina is not interior then Adelina is composite. If someone is interior and not argentous then they are composite. Red people are composite. If someone is argentous then they are not composite. Adelina is composite.", "logic": "\nArgentous(michal)\nInterior(adrien)\nArgentous(adrien)\nAneurismal(adelina)\nDemotic(willette)\nnot Murky(willette)\nXenogeneic(willette)\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) -> Demotic(x))\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Argentous(x))\nnot Demotic(adelina) and not Interior(adelina) -> Composite(adelina)\nforall x (Interior(x) and not Argentous(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Murky(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Argentous(x) -> not Composite(x))\n\nComposite(adelina)\n\nAneurismal(adelina) and forall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Demotic(x)) -> therefore Demotic(adelina) Demotic(adelina) and forall x (Demotic(x) -> Argentous(x)) -> therefore Argentous(adelina) Argentous(adelina) and forall x (Argentous(x) -> not Composite(x)) -> therefore not Composite(adelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Homer is risque. Valli is holy. Valli is risque. Nealon is warning. Hertha is premature. Hertha is not drifting. Hertha is manly. Kind people are premature. If someone is holy then they are premature. If someone is holy then they are premature. All premature people are risque. If Nealon is not premature and Nealon is not holy then Nealon is westside. If someone is holy and not risque then they are westside. Red people are westside. If someone is risque then they are not westside. Homer is not premature.", "logic": "\nRisque(homer)\nHoly(valli)\nRisque(valli)\nWarning(nealon)\nPremature(hertha)\nnot Drifting(hertha)\nManly(hertha)\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Holy(x) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Holy(x) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Premature(x) -> Risque(x))\nnot Premature(nealon) and not Holy(nealon) -> Westside(nealon)\nforall x (Holy(x) and not Risque(x) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Risque(x) -> not Westside(x))\n\nnot Premature(homer)\n\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Premature(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Stacy is nazi. Diena is allomerous. Diena is nazi. Virgie is uruguayan. Marin is engaged. Marin is not nonplused. Marin is jain. Kind people are engaged. If someone is allomerous then they are engaged. If someone is allomerous then they are engaged. All engaged people are nazi. If Virgie is not engaged and Virgie is not allomerous then Virgie is concrete. If someone is allomerous and not nazi then they are concrete. Red people are concrete. If someone is nazi then they are not concrete. Stacy is uruguayan.", "logic": "\nNazi(stacy)\nAllomerous(diena)\nNazi(diena)\nUruguayan(virgie)\nEngaged(marin)\nnot Nonplused(marin)\nJain(marin)\nforall x (Uruguayan(x) -> Engaged(x))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) -> Engaged(x))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) -> Engaged(x))\nforall x (Engaged(x) -> Nazi(x))\nnot Engaged(virgie) and not Allomerous(virgie) -> Concrete(virgie)\nforall x (Allomerous(x) and not Nazi(x) -> Concrete(x))\nforall x (Nonplused(x) -> Concrete(x))\nforall x (Nazi(x) -> not Concrete(x))\n\nUruguayan(stacy)\n\nUruguayan(stacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Janel is bragging. Trever is eudaemonic. Trever is bragging. Regan is petaloid. Jacqui is nugatory. Jacqui is not strep. Jacqui is doting. Kind people are nugatory. If someone is eudaemonic then they are nugatory. If someone is eudaemonic then they are nugatory. All nugatory people are bragging. If Regan is not nugatory and Regan is not eudaemonic then Regan is suburban. If someone is eudaemonic and not bragging then they are suburban. Red people are suburban. If someone is bragging then they are not suburban. Janel is not eudaemonic.", "logic": "\nBragging(janel)\nEudaemonic(trever)\nBragging(trever)\nPetaloid(regan)\nNugatory(jacqui)\nnot Strep(jacqui)\nDoting(jacqui)\nforall x (Petaloid(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Bragging(x))\nnot Nugatory(regan) and not Eudaemonic(regan) -> Suburban(regan)\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) and not Bragging(x) -> Suburban(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Suburban(x))\nforall x (Bragging(x) -> not Suburban(x))\n\nnot Eudaemonic(janel)\n\nnot Eudaemonic(janel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Eleni is softish. Rheba is bellicose. Rheba is softish. Revkah is frank. Eunice is cybernetic. Eunice is not roman. Eunice is skirting. Kind people are cybernetic. If someone is bellicose then they are cybernetic. If someone is bellicose then they are cybernetic. All cybernetic people are softish. If Revkah is not cybernetic and Revkah is not bellicose then Revkah is barricaded. If someone is bellicose and not softish then they are barricaded. Red people are barricaded. If someone is softish then they are not barricaded. Eleni is skirting.", "logic": "\nSoftish(eleni)\nBellicose(rheba)\nSoftish(rheba)\nFrank(revkah)\nCybernetic(eunice)\nnot Roman(eunice)\nSkirting(eunice)\nforall x (Frank(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) -> Softish(x))\nnot Cybernetic(revkah) and not Bellicose(revkah) -> Barricaded(revkah)\nforall x (Bellicose(x) and not Softish(x) -> Barricaded(x))\nforall x (Roman(x) -> Barricaded(x))\nforall x (Softish(x) -> not Barricaded(x))\n\nSkirting(eleni)\n\nSkirting(eleni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Dorise is both. Caroleen is slavonic. Caroleen is both. Marlin is laid. Eleanor is shakedown. Eleanor is not megalithic. Eleanor is varied. Kind people are shakedown. If someone is slavonic then they are shakedown. If someone is slavonic then they are shakedown. All shakedown people are both. If Marlin is not shakedown and Marlin is not slavonic then Marlin is long. If someone is slavonic and not both then they are long. Red people are long. If someone is both then they are not long. Marlin is not varied.", "logic": "\nBoth(dorise)\nSlavonic(caroleen)\nBoth(caroleen)\nLaid(marlin)\nShakedown(eleanor)\nnot Megalithic(eleanor)\nVaried(eleanor)\nforall x (Laid(x) -> Shakedown(x))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) -> Shakedown(x))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) -> Shakedown(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Both(x))\nnot Shakedown(marlin) and not Slavonic(marlin) -> Long(marlin)\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and not Both(x) -> Long(x))\nforall x (Megalithic(x) -> Long(x))\nforall x (Both(x) -> not Long(x))\n\nnot Varied(marlin)\n\nnot Varied(marlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Eugenie is lowercase. Milo is bushy. Milo is lowercase. Nitin is goethean. Jesse is calceolate. Jesse is not capable. Jesse is unhopeful. Kind people are calceolate. If someone is bushy then they are calceolate. If someone is bushy then they are calceolate. All calceolate people are lowercase. If Nitin is not calceolate and Nitin is not bushy then Nitin is submerged. If someone is bushy and not lowercase then they are submerged. Red people are submerged. If someone is lowercase then they are not submerged. Jesse is bushy.", "logic": "\nLowercase(eugenie)\nBushy(milo)\nLowercase(milo)\nGoethean(nitin)\nCalceolate(jesse)\nnot Capable(jesse)\nUnhopeful(jesse)\nforall x (Goethean(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Bushy(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Bushy(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) -> Lowercase(x))\nnot Calceolate(nitin) and not Bushy(nitin) -> Submerged(nitin)\nforall x (Bushy(x) and not Lowercase(x) -> Submerged(x))\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Submerged(x))\nforall x (Lowercase(x) -> not Submerged(x))\n\nBushy(jesse)\n\nBushy(jesse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Josephus is ratable. Patsy is motional. Patsy is ratable. Verene is shortish. Gav is renegade. Gav is not optical. Gav is diamantine. Kind people are renegade. If someone is motional then they are renegade. If someone is motional then they are renegade. All renegade people are ratable. If Verene is not renegade and Verene is not motional then Verene is monecious. If someone is motional and not ratable then they are monecious. Red people are monecious. If someone is ratable then they are not monecious. Patsy is not shortish.", "logic": "\nRatable(josephus)\nMotional(patsy)\nRatable(patsy)\nShortish(verene)\nRenegade(gav)\nnot Optical(gav)\nDiamantine(gav)\nforall x (Shortish(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Motional(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Motional(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Renegade(x) -> Ratable(x))\nnot Renegade(verene) and not Motional(verene) -> Monecious(verene)\nforall x (Motional(x) and not Ratable(x) -> Monecious(x))\nforall x (Optical(x) -> Monecious(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> not Monecious(x))\n\nnot Shortish(patsy)\n\nnot Shortish(patsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Esta is weary. Monah is apropos. Monah is weary. Cary is crashing. Ulrich is unaffected. Ulrich is not automated. Ulrich is false. Kind people are unaffected. If someone is apropos then they are unaffected. If someone is apropos then they are unaffected. All unaffected people are weary. If Cary is not unaffected and Cary is not apropos then Cary is optical. If someone is apropos and not weary then they are optical. Red people are optical. If someone is weary then they are not optical. Ulrich is crashing.", "logic": "\nWeary(esta)\nApropos(monah)\nWeary(monah)\nCrashing(cary)\nUnaffected(ulrich)\nnot Automated(ulrich)\nFalse(ulrich)\nforall x (Crashing(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nforall x (Unaffected(x) -> Weary(x))\nnot Unaffected(cary) and not Apropos(cary) -> Optical(cary)\nforall x (Apropos(x) and not Weary(x) -> Optical(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) -> Optical(x))\nforall x (Weary(x) -> not Optical(x))\n\nCrashing(ulrich)\n\nCrashing(ulrich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "The francesco nauseate the wendell. The francesco is classic. The francesco is chestnut. The francesco erupt the wendell. The wendell nauseate the francesco. The wendell rebind the francesco. The wendell erupt the francesco. If someone is moderato and they eat the wendell then they are obliged. If someone rebind the wendell and they chase the wendell then they see the wendell. If someone is classic then they eat the francesco. If someone erupt the wendell and they chase the wendell then they eat the francesco. If someone nauseate the wendell then the wendell erupt the francesco. If someone rebind the wendell then the wendell nauseate the francesco. If someone erupt the wendell then the wendell is moderato. If the francesco erupt the wendell then the wendell is obliged. The wendell nauseate the francesco.", "logic": "\nNauseate(francesco, wendell)\nClassic(francesco)\nChestnut(francesco)\nErupt(francesco, wendell)\nNauseate(wendell, francesco)\nRebind(wendell, francesco)\nErupt(wendell, francesco)\nforall x (Moderato(x) and Rebind(x, wendell) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Rebind(x, wendell) and Nauseate(x, wendell) -> Erupt(x, wendell))\nforall x (Classic(x) -> Rebind(x, francesco))\nforall x (Erupt(x, wendell) and Nauseate(x, wendell) -> Rebind(x, francesco))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, wendell) -> Erupt(wendell, francesco))\nforall x (Rebind(x, wendell) -> Nauseate(wendell, francesco))\nforall x (Erupt(x, wendell) -> Moderato(wendell))\nErupt(francesco, wendell) -> Obliged(wendell)\n\nNauseate(wendell, francesco)\n\ntherefore Nauseate(wendell, francesco)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "The tamiko down the garnette. The tamiko is burked. The tamiko is otherwise. The tamiko lick the garnette. The garnette down the tamiko. The garnette overclothe the tamiko. The garnette lick the tamiko. If someone is outcast and they eat the garnette then they are clammy. If someone overclothe the garnette and they chase the garnette then they see the garnette. If someone is burked then they eat the tamiko. If someone lick the garnette and they chase the garnette then they eat the tamiko. If someone down the garnette then the garnette lick the tamiko. If someone overclothe the garnette then the garnette down the tamiko. If someone lick the garnette then the garnette is outcast. If the tamiko lick the garnette then the garnette is clammy. The tamiko is not burked.", "logic": "\nDown(tamiko, garnette)\nBurked(tamiko)\nOtherwise(tamiko)\nLick(tamiko, garnette)\nDown(garnette, tamiko)\nOverclothe(garnette, tamiko)\nLick(garnette, tamiko)\nforall x (Outcast(x) and Overclothe(x, garnette) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Overclothe(x, garnette) and Down(x, garnette) -> Lick(x, garnette))\nforall x (Burked(x) -> Overclothe(x, tamiko))\nforall x (Lick(x, garnette) and Down(x, garnette) -> Overclothe(x, tamiko))\nforall x (Down(x, garnette) -> Lick(garnette, tamiko))\nforall x (Overclothe(x, garnette) -> Down(garnette, tamiko))\nforall x (Lick(x, garnette) -> Outcast(garnette))\nLick(tamiko, garnette) -> Clammy(garnette)\n\nnot Burked(tamiko)\n\ntherefore Burked(tamiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "The jodie console the tommi. The jodie is hardheaded. The jodie is weighted. The jodie skulk the tommi. The tommi console the jodie. The tommi voice the jodie. The tommi skulk the jodie. If someone is winged and they eat the tommi then they are detected. If someone voice the tommi and they chase the tommi then they see the tommi. If someone is hardheaded then they eat the jodie. If someone skulk the tommi and they chase the tommi then they eat the jodie. If someone console the tommi then the tommi skulk the jodie. If someone voice the tommi then the tommi console the jodie. If someone skulk the tommi then the tommi is winged. If the jodie skulk the tommi then the tommi is detected. The jodie voice the jodie.", "logic": "\nConsole(jodie, tommi)\nHardheaded(jodie)\nWeighted(jodie)\nSkulk(jodie, tommi)\nConsole(tommi, jodie)\nVoice(tommi, jodie)\nSkulk(tommi, jodie)\nforall x (Winged(x) and Voice(x, tommi) -> Detected(x))\nforall x (Voice(x, tommi) and Console(x, tommi) -> Skulk(x, tommi))\nforall x (Hardheaded(x) -> Voice(x, jodie))\nforall x (Skulk(x, tommi) and Console(x, tommi) -> Voice(x, jodie))\nforall x (Console(x, tommi) -> Skulk(tommi, jodie))\nforall x (Voice(x, tommi) -> Console(tommi, jodie))\nforall x (Skulk(x, tommi) -> Winged(tommi))\nSkulk(jodie, tommi) -> Detected(tommi)\n\nVoice(jodie, jodie)\n\nHardheaded(jodie) and forall x (Hardheaded(x) -> Voice(x, jodie)) -> therefore Voice(jodie, jodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "The phillip bone the monty. The phillip is prosodic. The phillip is numerical. The phillip outnumber the monty. The monty bone the phillip. The monty eject the phillip. The monty outnumber the phillip. If someone is ungallant and they eat the monty then they are locomotive. If someone eject the monty and they chase the monty then they see the monty. If someone is prosodic then they eat the phillip. If someone outnumber the monty and they chase the monty then they eat the phillip. If someone bone the monty then the monty outnumber the phillip. If someone eject the monty then the monty bone the phillip. If someone outnumber the monty then the monty is ungallant. If the phillip outnumber the monty then the monty is locomotive. The phillip does not eat the phillip.", "logic": "\nBone(phillip, monty)\nProsodic(phillip)\nNumerical(phillip)\nOutnumber(phillip, monty)\nBone(monty, phillip)\nEject(monty, phillip)\nOutnumber(monty, phillip)\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Eject(x, monty) -> Locomotive(x))\nforall x (Eject(x, monty) and Bone(x, monty) -> Outnumber(x, monty))\nforall x (Prosodic(x) -> Eject(x, phillip))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, monty) and Bone(x, monty) -> Eject(x, phillip))\nforall x (Bone(x, monty) -> Outnumber(monty, phillip))\nforall x (Eject(x, monty) -> Bone(monty, phillip))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, monty) -> Ungallant(monty))\nOutnumber(phillip, monty) -> Locomotive(monty)\n\nnot Eject(phillip, phillip)\n\nProsodic(phillip) and forall x (Prosodic(x) -> Eject(x, phillip)) -> therefore Eject(phillip, phillip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "The lanna wench the benito. The lanna is hypaethral. The lanna is athirst. The lanna wave the benito. The benito wench the lanna. The benito free the lanna. The benito wave the lanna. If someone is sunrise and they eat the benito then they are rigged. If someone free the benito and they chase the benito then they see the benito. If someone is hypaethral then they eat the lanna. If someone wave the benito and they chase the benito then they eat the lanna. If someone wench the benito then the benito wave the lanna. If someone free the benito then the benito wench the lanna. If someone wave the benito then the benito is sunrise. If the lanna wave the benito then the benito is rigged. The benito does not see the benito.", "logic": "\nWench(lanna, benito)\nHypaethral(lanna)\nAthirst(lanna)\nWave(lanna, benito)\nWench(benito, lanna)\nFree(benito, lanna)\nWave(benito, lanna)\nforall x (Sunrise(x) and Free(x, benito) -> Rigged(x))\nforall x (Free(x, benito) and Wench(x, benito) -> Wave(x, benito))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) -> Free(x, lanna))\nforall x (Wave(x, benito) and Wench(x, benito) -> Free(x, lanna))\nforall x (Wench(x, benito) -> Wave(benito, lanna))\nforall x (Free(x, benito) -> Wench(benito, lanna))\nforall x (Wave(x, benito) -> Sunrise(benito))\nWave(lanna, benito) -> Rigged(benito)\n\nnot Wave(benito, benito)\n\nforall x (Free(x, benito) and Wench(x, benito) -> Wave(x, benito)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "The karisa void the pepita. The karisa is hyperbolic. The karisa is federal. The karisa favor the pepita. The pepita void the karisa. The pepita claim the karisa. The pepita favor the karisa. If someone is wooded and they eat the pepita then they are untagged. If someone claim the pepita and they chase the pepita then they see the pepita. If someone is hyperbolic then they eat the karisa. If someone favor the pepita and they chase the pepita then they eat the karisa. If someone void the pepita then the pepita favor the karisa. If someone claim the pepita then the pepita void the karisa. If someone favor the pepita then the pepita is wooded. If the karisa favor the pepita then the pepita is untagged. The karisa is untagged.", "logic": "\nVoid(karisa, pepita)\nHyperbolic(karisa)\nFederal(karisa)\nFavor(karisa, pepita)\nVoid(pepita, karisa)\nClaim(pepita, karisa)\nFavor(pepita, karisa)\nforall x (Wooded(x) and Claim(x, pepita) -> Untagged(x))\nforall x (Claim(x, pepita) and Void(x, pepita) -> Favor(x, pepita))\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) -> Claim(x, karisa))\nforall x (Favor(x, pepita) and Void(x, pepita) -> Claim(x, karisa))\nforall x (Void(x, pepita) -> Favor(pepita, karisa))\nforall x (Claim(x, pepita) -> Void(pepita, karisa))\nforall x (Favor(x, pepita) -> Wooded(pepita))\nFavor(karisa, pepita) -> Untagged(pepita)\n\nUntagged(karisa)\n\nforall x (Wooded(x) and Claim(x, pepita) -> Untagged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "The gavriel gird the kassandra. The gavriel is anestrous. The gavriel is stingy. The gavriel whop the kassandra. The kassandra gird the gavriel. The kassandra breeze the gavriel. The kassandra whop the gavriel. If someone is soggy and they eat the kassandra then they are feminine. If someone breeze the kassandra and they chase the kassandra then they see the kassandra. If someone is anestrous then they eat the gavriel. If someone whop the kassandra and they chase the kassandra then they eat the gavriel. If someone gird the kassandra then the kassandra whop the gavriel. If someone breeze the kassandra then the kassandra gird the gavriel. If someone whop the kassandra then the kassandra is soggy. If the gavriel whop the kassandra then the kassandra is feminine. The kassandra does not eat the kassandra.", "logic": "\nGird(gavriel, kassandra)\nAnestrous(gavriel)\nStingy(gavriel)\nWhop(gavriel, kassandra)\nGird(kassandra, gavriel)\nBreeze(kassandra, gavriel)\nWhop(kassandra, gavriel)\nforall x (Soggy(x) and Breeze(x, kassandra) -> Feminine(x))\nforall x (Breeze(x, kassandra) and Gird(x, kassandra) -> Whop(x, kassandra))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> Breeze(x, gavriel))\nforall x (Whop(x, kassandra) and Gird(x, kassandra) -> Breeze(x, gavriel))\nforall x (Gird(x, kassandra) -> Whop(kassandra, gavriel))\nforall x (Breeze(x, kassandra) -> Gird(kassandra, gavriel))\nforall x (Whop(x, kassandra) -> Soggy(kassandra))\nWhop(gavriel, kassandra) -> Feminine(kassandra)\n\nnot Breeze(kassandra, kassandra)\n\nnot Breeze(kassandra, kassandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "The marlie fizzle the hanson. The marlie is satisfying. The marlie is utile. The marlie loop the hanson. The hanson fizzle the marlie. The hanson emboss the marlie. The hanson loop the marlie. If someone is intestinal and they eat the hanson then they are cheating. If someone emboss the hanson and they chase the hanson then they see the hanson. If someone is satisfying then they eat the marlie. If someone loop the hanson and they chase the hanson then they eat the marlie. If someone fizzle the hanson then the hanson loop the marlie. If someone emboss the hanson then the hanson fizzle the marlie. If someone loop the hanson then the hanson is intestinal. If the marlie loop the hanson then the hanson is cheating. The marlie loop the marlie.", "logic": "\nFizzle(marlie, hanson)\nSatisfying(marlie)\nUtile(marlie)\nLoop(marlie, hanson)\nFizzle(hanson, marlie)\nEmboss(hanson, marlie)\nLoop(hanson, marlie)\nforall x (Intestinal(x) and Emboss(x, hanson) -> Cheating(x))\nforall x (Emboss(x, hanson) and Fizzle(x, hanson) -> Loop(x, hanson))\nforall x (Satisfying(x) -> Emboss(x, marlie))\nforall x (Loop(x, hanson) and Fizzle(x, hanson) -> Emboss(x, marlie))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, hanson) -> Loop(hanson, marlie))\nforall x (Emboss(x, hanson) -> Fizzle(hanson, marlie))\nforall x (Loop(x, hanson) -> Intestinal(hanson))\nLoop(marlie, hanson) -> Cheating(hanson)\n\nLoop(marlie, marlie)\n\nLoop(marlie, marlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1137"} {"premises": "Addie is cliquish. Addie is oddish. Addie is appendant. Addie is deranged. Addie is teenaged. Addie is tinseled. Chrystel is teenaged. Smart people are teenaged. All teenaged people are cliquish. All appendant, teenaged people are oddish. Nice people are appendant. Quiet people are deranged. If Addie is deranged then Addie is teenaged. Addie is cliquish.", "logic": "\nCliquish(addie)\nOddish(addie)\nAppendant(addie)\nDeranged(addie)\nTeenaged(addie)\nTinseled(addie)\nTeenaged(chrystel)\nforall x (Tinseled(x) -> Teenaged(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Cliquish(x))\nforall x (Appendant(x) and Teenaged(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Deranged(x) -> Appendant(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Deranged(x))\nDeranged(addie) -> Teenaged(addie)\n\nCliquish(addie)\n\ntherefore Cliquish(addie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Carmela is crispy. Carmela is unflavored. Carmela is unblessed. Carmela is facial. Carmela is unthought. Carmela is unfurrowed. Olia is unthought. Smart people are unthought. All unthought people are crispy. All unblessed, unthought people are unflavored. Nice people are unblessed. Quiet people are facial. If Carmela is facial then Carmela is unthought. Carmela is not unfurrowed.", "logic": "\nCrispy(carmela)\nUnflavored(carmela)\nUnblessed(carmela)\nFacial(carmela)\nUnthought(carmela)\nUnfurrowed(carmela)\nUnthought(olia)\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Unthought(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Crispy(x))\nforall x (Unblessed(x) and Unthought(x) -> Unflavored(x))\nforall x (Facial(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Facial(x))\nFacial(carmela) -> Unthought(carmela)\n\nnot Unfurrowed(carmela)\n\ntherefore Unfurrowed(carmela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Shelby is adynamic. Shelby is basipetal. Shelby is sobering. Shelby is snooty. Shelby is charged. Shelby is monogynous. Abram is charged. Smart people are charged. All charged people are adynamic. All sobering, charged people are basipetal. Nice people are sobering. Quiet people are snooty. If Shelby is snooty then Shelby is charged. Abram is adynamic.", "logic": "\nAdynamic(shelby)\nBasipetal(shelby)\nSobering(shelby)\nSnooty(shelby)\nCharged(shelby)\nMonogynous(shelby)\nCharged(abram)\nforall x (Monogynous(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Adynamic(x))\nforall x (Sobering(x) and Charged(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Snooty(x) -> Sobering(x))\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Snooty(x))\nSnooty(shelby) -> Charged(shelby)\n\nAdynamic(abram)\n\nCharged(abram) and forall x (Charged(x) -> Adynamic(x)) -> therefore Adynamic(abram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Madelle is cymose. Madelle is tyrolese. Madelle is hugoesque. Madelle is plucky. Madelle is sordid. Madelle is coenobitic. Hanford is sordid. Smart people are sordid. All sordid people are cymose. All hugoesque, sordid people are tyrolese. Nice people are hugoesque. Quiet people are plucky. If Madelle is plucky then Madelle is sordid. Hanford is not cymose.", "logic": "\nCymose(madelle)\nTyrolese(madelle)\nHugoesque(madelle)\nPlucky(madelle)\nSordid(madelle)\nCoenobitic(madelle)\nSordid(hanford)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Sordid(x))\nforall x (Sordid(x) -> Cymose(x))\nforall x (Hugoesque(x) and Sordid(x) -> Tyrolese(x))\nforall x (Plucky(x) -> Hugoesque(x))\nforall x (Sordid(x) -> Plucky(x))\nPlucky(madelle) -> Sordid(madelle)\n\nnot Cymose(hanford)\n\nSordid(hanford) and forall x (Sordid(x) -> Cymose(x)) -> therefore Cymose(hanford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Joela is alleged. Joela is unlit. Joela is gordian. Joela is sealed. Joela is birchen. Joela is unsold. Tiffanie is birchen. Smart people are birchen. All birchen people are alleged. All gordian, birchen people are unlit. Nice people are gordian. Quiet people are sealed. If Joela is sealed then Joela is birchen. Tiffanie is gordian.", "logic": "\nAlleged(joela)\nUnlit(joela)\nGordian(joela)\nSealed(joela)\nBirchen(joela)\nUnsold(joela)\nBirchen(tiffanie)\nforall x (Unsold(x) -> Birchen(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) -> Alleged(x))\nforall x (Gordian(x) and Birchen(x) -> Unlit(x))\nforall x (Sealed(x) -> Gordian(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) -> Sealed(x))\nSealed(joela) -> Birchen(joela)\n\nGordian(tiffanie)\n\nBirchen(tiffanie) and forall x (Birchen(x) -> Sealed(x)) -> therefore Sealed(tiffanie) Sealed(tiffanie) and forall x (Sealed(x) -> Gordian(x)) -> therefore Gordian(tiffanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Emanuela is outgoing. Emanuela is purulent. Emanuela is parenteral. Emanuela is chemic. Emanuela is lazy. Emanuela is propertied. Keely is lazy. Smart people are lazy. All lazy people are outgoing. All parenteral, lazy people are purulent. Nice people are parenteral. Quiet people are chemic. If Emanuela is chemic then Emanuela is lazy. Keely is not parenteral.", "logic": "\nOutgoing(emanuela)\nPurulent(emanuela)\nParenteral(emanuela)\nChemic(emanuela)\nLazy(emanuela)\nPropertied(emanuela)\nLazy(keely)\nforall x (Propertied(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Lazy(x) -> Outgoing(x))\nforall x (Parenteral(x) and Lazy(x) -> Purulent(x))\nforall x (Chemic(x) -> Parenteral(x))\nforall x (Lazy(x) -> Chemic(x))\nChemic(emanuela) -> Lazy(emanuela)\n\nnot Parenteral(keely)\n\nLazy(keely) and forall x (Lazy(x) -> Chemic(x)) -> therefore Chemic(keely) Chemic(keely) and forall x (Chemic(x) -> Parenteral(x)) -> therefore Parenteral(keely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Nancie is utilizable. Nancie is zimbabwean. Nancie is licked. Nancie is coccoid. Nancie is larval. Nancie is adducent. Sherri is larval. Smart people are larval. All larval people are utilizable. All licked, larval people are zimbabwean. Nice people are licked. Quiet people are coccoid. If Nancie is coccoid then Nancie is larval. Sherri is zimbabwean.", "logic": "\nUtilizable(nancie)\nZimbabwean(nancie)\nLicked(nancie)\nCoccoid(nancie)\nLarval(nancie)\nAdducent(nancie)\nLarval(sherri)\nforall x (Adducent(x) -> Larval(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) -> Utilizable(x))\nforall x (Licked(x) and Larval(x) -> Zimbabwean(x))\nforall x (Coccoid(x) -> Licked(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nCoccoid(nancie) -> Larval(nancie)\n\nZimbabwean(sherri)\n\nLarval(sherri) and forall x (Larval(x) -> Coccoid(x)) -> therefore Coccoid(sherri) Coccoid(sherri) and forall x (Coccoid(x) -> Licked(x)) -> therefore Licked(sherri) Licked(sherri) and Larval(sherri) and forall x (Licked(x) and Larval(x) -> Zimbabwean(x)) -> therefore Zimbabwean(sherri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Harv is licentious. Harv is fatal. Harv is mossy. Harv is relentless. Harv is slow. Harv is monandrous. Francoise is slow. Smart people are slow. All slow people are licentious. All mossy, slow people are fatal. Nice people are mossy. Quiet people are relentless. If Harv is relentless then Harv is slow. Francoise is not fatal.", "logic": "\nLicentious(harv)\nFatal(harv)\nMossy(harv)\nRelentless(harv)\nSlow(harv)\nMonandrous(harv)\nSlow(francoise)\nforall x (Monandrous(x) -> Slow(x))\nforall x (Slow(x) -> Licentious(x))\nforall x (Mossy(x) and Slow(x) -> Fatal(x))\nforall x (Relentless(x) -> Mossy(x))\nforall x (Slow(x) -> Relentless(x))\nRelentless(harv) -> Slow(harv)\n\nnot Fatal(francoise)\n\nSlow(francoise) and forall x (Slow(x) -> Relentless(x)) -> therefore Relentless(francoise) Relentless(francoise) and forall x (Relentless(x) -> Mossy(x)) -> therefore Mossy(francoise) Mossy(francoise) and Slow(francoise) and forall x (Mossy(x) and Slow(x) -> Fatal(x)) -> therefore Fatal(francoise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Corena is clinical. Corena is velvet. Corena is myalgic. Corena is interwoven. Corena is occlusive. Corena is graded. Marylinda is occlusive. Smart people are occlusive. All occlusive people are clinical. All myalgic, occlusive people are velvet. Nice people are myalgic. Quiet people are interwoven. If Corena is interwoven then Corena is occlusive. Corena is not young.", "logic": "\nClinical(corena)\nVelvet(corena)\nMyalgic(corena)\nInterwoven(corena)\nOcclusive(corena)\nGraded(corena)\nOcclusive(marylinda)\nforall x (Graded(x) -> Occlusive(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) -> Clinical(x))\nforall x (Myalgic(x) and Occlusive(x) -> Velvet(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) -> Myalgic(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) -> Interwoven(x))\nInterwoven(corena) -> Occlusive(corena)\n\nnot Young(corena)\n\nnot Young(corena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "Joane is removed. Joane is unshorn. Joane is walleyed. Joane is crosstown. Joane is tongueless. Joane is obstructed. Humphrey is tongueless. Smart people are tongueless. All tongueless people are removed. All walleyed, tongueless people are unshorn. Nice people are walleyed. Quiet people are crosstown. If Joane is crosstown then Joane is tongueless. Humphrey is young.", "logic": "\nRemoved(joane)\nUnshorn(joane)\nWalleyed(joane)\nCrosstown(joane)\nTongueless(joane)\nObstructed(joane)\nTongueless(humphrey)\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Tongueless(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) and Tongueless(x) -> Unshorn(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Tongueless(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nCrosstown(joane) -> Tongueless(joane)\n\nYoung(humphrey)\n\nYoung(humphrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1871"} {"premises": "The nancy is placid. The ninnetta rename the israel. The etta swipe the ninnetta. The israel swipe the etta. If someone is placid and they eat the israel then they are eastward. If someone conjoin the nancy then they are eastward. If someone is antiquated and they visit the ninnetta then they chase the etta. If someone rename the nancy then they eat the nancy. If someone swipe the etta and the etta rename the israel then they are antiquated. If someone is portable then they visit the nancy. If someone conjoin the etta and the etta swipe the ninnetta then the ninnetta is antiquated. If someone rename the nancy then they visit the israel. The etta swipe the ninnetta.", "logic": "\nPlacid(nancy)\nRename(ninnetta, israel)\nSwipe(etta, ninnetta)\nSwipe(israel, etta)\nforall x (Placid(x) and Swipe(x, israel) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, nancy) -> Eastward(x))\nforall x (Antiquated(x) and Conjoin(x, ninnetta) -> Rename(x, etta))\nforall x (Rename(x, nancy) -> Swipe(x, nancy))\nforall x (Swipe(x, etta) and Rename(etta, israel) -> Antiquated(x))\nforall x (Portable(x) -> Conjoin(x, nancy))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, etta) and Swipe(etta, ninnetta) -> Antiquated(ninnetta))\nforall x (Rename(x, nancy) -> Conjoin(x, israel))\n\nSwipe(etta, ninnetta)\n\ntherefore Swipe(etta, ninnetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2671"} {"premises": "The mufinella is overshot. The kellia scar the gardiner. The aram toughen the kellia. The gardiner toughen the aram. If someone is overshot and they eat the gardiner then they are agleam. If someone acetylate the mufinella then they are agleam. If someone is eidetic and they visit the kellia then they chase the aram. If someone scar the mufinella then they eat the mufinella. If someone toughen the aram and the aram scar the gardiner then they are eidetic. If someone is assurgent then they visit the mufinella. If someone acetylate the aram and the aram toughen the kellia then the kellia is eidetic. If someone scar the mufinella then they visit the gardiner. The aram does not eat the kellia.", "logic": "\nOvershot(mufinella)\nScar(kellia, gardiner)\nToughen(aram, kellia)\nToughen(gardiner, aram)\nforall x (Overshot(x) and Toughen(x, gardiner) -> Agleam(x))\nforall x (Acetylate(x, mufinella) -> Agleam(x))\nforall x (Eidetic(x) and Acetylate(x, kellia) -> Scar(x, aram))\nforall x (Scar(x, mufinella) -> Toughen(x, mufinella))\nforall x (Toughen(x, aram) and Scar(aram, gardiner) -> Eidetic(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) -> Acetylate(x, mufinella))\nforall x (Acetylate(x, aram) and Toughen(aram, kellia) -> Eidetic(kellia))\nforall x (Scar(x, mufinella) -> Acetylate(x, gardiner))\n\nnot Toughen(aram, kellia)\n\ntherefore Toughen(aram, kellia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2671"} {"premises": "The flo is winsome. The orrin swill the emmey. The stefanie jingle the orrin. The emmey jingle the stefanie. If someone is winsome and they eat the emmey then they are violent. If someone cocainize the flo then they are violent. If someone is ruandan and they visit the orrin then they chase the stefanie. If someone swill the flo then they eat the flo. If someone jingle the stefanie and the stefanie swill the emmey then they are ruandan. If someone is involute then they visit the flo. If someone cocainize the stefanie and the stefanie jingle the orrin then the orrin is ruandan. If someone swill the flo then they visit the emmey. The orrin is not violent.", "logic": "\nWinsome(flo)\nSwill(orrin, emmey)\nJingle(stefanie, orrin)\nJingle(emmey, stefanie)\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Jingle(x, emmey) -> Violent(x))\nforall x (Cocainize(x, flo) -> Violent(x))\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Cocainize(x, orrin) -> Swill(x, stefanie))\nforall x (Swill(x, flo) -> Jingle(x, flo))\nforall x (Jingle(x, stefanie) and Swill(stefanie, emmey) -> Ruandan(x))\nforall x (Involute(x) -> Cocainize(x, flo))\nforall x (Cocainize(x, stefanie) and Jingle(stefanie, orrin) -> Ruandan(orrin))\nforall x (Swill(x, flo) -> Cocainize(x, emmey))\n\nnot Violent(orrin)\n\nforall x (Cocainize(x, flo) -> Violent(x)) <- forall x (Involute(x) -> Cocainize(x, flo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2671"} {"premises": "The katee is dominant. The lurleen subdue the lucio. The aridatha weightlift the lurleen. The lucio weightlift the aridatha. If someone is dominant and they eat the lucio then they are extreme. If someone unveil the katee then they are extreme. If someone is kindly and they visit the lurleen then they chase the aridatha. If someone subdue the katee then they eat the katee. If someone weightlift the aridatha and the aridatha subdue the lucio then they are kindly. If someone is chivalrous then they visit the katee. If someone unveil the aridatha and the aridatha weightlift the lurleen then the lurleen is kindly. If someone subdue the katee then they visit the lucio. The lucio subdue the lurleen.", "logic": "\nDominant(katee)\nSubdue(lurleen, lucio)\nWeightlift(aridatha, lurleen)\nWeightlift(lucio, aridatha)\nforall x (Dominant(x) and Weightlift(x, lucio) -> Extreme(x))\nforall x (Unveil(x, katee) -> Extreme(x))\nforall x (Kindly(x) and Unveil(x, lurleen) -> Subdue(x, aridatha))\nforall x (Subdue(x, katee) -> Weightlift(x, katee))\nforall x (Weightlift(x, aridatha) and Subdue(aridatha, lucio) -> Kindly(x))\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) -> Unveil(x, katee))\nforall x (Unveil(x, aridatha) and Weightlift(aridatha, lurleen) -> Kindly(lurleen))\nforall x (Subdue(x, katee) -> Unveil(x, lucio))\n\nSubdue(lucio, lurleen)\n\nSubdue(lucio, lurleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2671"} {"premises": "The chaunce labour the ignazio. The chaunce is boneless. The chaunce is outmoded. The chaunce blacken the ignazio. The chaunce fester the ignazio. The ignazio labour the chaunce. The ignazio is boneless. The ignazio is unshaped. The ignazio is outmoded. The ignazio is threepenny. The ignazio blacken the chaunce. The ignazio fester the chaunce. If the ignazio labour the chaunce and the ignazio blacken the chaunce then the ignazio fester the chaunce. If someone fester the ignazio and the ignazio is outmoded then the ignazio blacken the chaunce. If someone blacken the chaunce then they are threepenny. The chaunce labour the ignazio.", "logic": "\nLabour(chaunce, ignazio)\nBoneless(chaunce)\nOutmoded(chaunce)\nBlacken(chaunce, ignazio)\nFester(chaunce, ignazio)\nLabour(ignazio, chaunce)\nBoneless(ignazio)\nUnshaped(ignazio)\nOutmoded(ignazio)\nThreepenny(ignazio)\nBlacken(ignazio, chaunce)\nFester(ignazio, chaunce)\nLabour(ignazio, chaunce) and Blacken(ignazio, chaunce) -> Fester(ignazio, chaunce)\nforall x (Fester(x, ignazio) and Outmoded(ignazio) -> Blacken(ignazio, chaunce))\nforall x (Blacken(x, chaunce) -> Threepenny(x))\n\nLabour(chaunce, ignazio)\n\ntherefore Labour(chaunce, ignazio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4289"} {"premises": "The cyrille disavow the jefferey. The cyrille is swiss. The cyrille is edentulous. The cyrille rove the jefferey. The cyrille oversleep the jefferey. The jefferey disavow the cyrille. The jefferey is swiss. The jefferey is fagged. The jefferey is edentulous. The jefferey is arced. The jefferey rove the cyrille. The jefferey oversleep the cyrille. If the jefferey disavow the cyrille and the jefferey rove the cyrille then the jefferey oversleep the cyrille. If someone oversleep the jefferey and the jefferey is edentulous then the jefferey rove the cyrille. If someone rove the cyrille then they are arced. The jefferey is not arced.", "logic": "\nDisavow(cyrille, jefferey)\nSwiss(cyrille)\nEdentulous(cyrille)\nRove(cyrille, jefferey)\nOversleep(cyrille, jefferey)\nDisavow(jefferey, cyrille)\nSwiss(jefferey)\nFagged(jefferey)\nEdentulous(jefferey)\nArced(jefferey)\nRove(jefferey, cyrille)\nOversleep(jefferey, cyrille)\nDisavow(jefferey, cyrille) and Rove(jefferey, cyrille) -> Oversleep(jefferey, cyrille)\nforall x (Oversleep(x, jefferey) and Edentulous(jefferey) -> Rove(jefferey, cyrille))\nforall x (Rove(x, cyrille) -> Arced(x))\n\nnot Arced(jefferey)\n\ntherefore Arced(jefferey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4289"} {"premises": "The meaghan conflict the cati. The meaghan is kingly. The meaghan is glaring. The meaghan boost the cati. The meaghan politicize the cati. The cati conflict the meaghan. The cati is kingly. The cati is cacuminal. The cati is glaring. The cati is burdenless. The cati boost the meaghan. The cati politicize the meaghan. If the cati conflict the meaghan and the cati boost the meaghan then the cati politicize the meaghan. If someone politicize the cati and the cati is glaring then the cati boost the meaghan. If someone boost the meaghan then they are burdenless. The meaghan is not burdenless.", "logic": "\nConflict(meaghan, cati)\nKingly(meaghan)\nGlaring(meaghan)\nBoost(meaghan, cati)\nPoliticize(meaghan, cati)\nConflict(cati, meaghan)\nKingly(cati)\nCacuminal(cati)\nGlaring(cati)\nBurdenless(cati)\nBoost(cati, meaghan)\nPoliticize(cati, meaghan)\nConflict(cati, meaghan) and Boost(cati, meaghan) -> Politicize(cati, meaghan)\nforall x (Politicize(x, cati) and Glaring(cati) -> Boost(cati, meaghan))\nforall x (Boost(x, meaghan) -> Burdenless(x))\n\nnot Burdenless(meaghan)\n\nforall x (Boost(x, meaghan) -> Burdenless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4289"} {"premises": "The alfred bullyrag the dasha. The alfred is pleasant. The alfred is amblyopic. The alfred create the dasha. The alfred suffocate the dasha. The dasha bullyrag the alfred. The dasha is pleasant. The dasha is nonporous. The dasha is amblyopic. The dasha is cometic. The dasha create the alfred. The dasha suffocate the alfred. If the dasha bullyrag the alfred and the dasha create the alfred then the dasha suffocate the alfred. If someone suffocate the dasha and the dasha is amblyopic then the dasha create the alfred. If someone create the alfred then they are cometic. The alfred is nonporous.", "logic": "\nBullyrag(alfred, dasha)\nPleasant(alfred)\nAmblyopic(alfred)\nCreate(alfred, dasha)\nSuffocate(alfred, dasha)\nBullyrag(dasha, alfred)\nPleasant(dasha)\nNonporous(dasha)\nAmblyopic(dasha)\nCometic(dasha)\nCreate(dasha, alfred)\nSuffocate(dasha, alfred)\nBullyrag(dasha, alfred) and Create(dasha, alfred) -> Suffocate(dasha, alfred)\nforall x (Suffocate(x, dasha) and Amblyopic(dasha) -> Create(dasha, alfred))\nforall x (Create(x, alfred) -> Cometic(x))\n\nNonporous(alfred)\n\nNonporous(alfred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4289"} {"premises": "The lori is polished. The lori absent the hanni. The hanni absent the lori. If the lori is polished then the lori glaze the hanni. If something fornicate the hanni then it absent the lori. If something fornicate the hanni then it absent the hanni. If the hanni absent the lori and the lori is reversive then the lori glaze the hanni. If something absent the hanni and it absent the lori then the lori is tasteless. If something absent the lori then the lori fornicate the hanni. The hanni absent the lori.", "logic": "\nPolished(lori)\nAbsent(lori, hanni)\nAbsent(hanni, lori)\nPolished(lori) -> Glaze(lori, hanni)\nforall x (Fornicate(x, hanni) -> Absent(x, lori))\nforall x (Fornicate(x, hanni) -> Absent(x, hanni))\nAbsent(hanni, lori) and Reversive(lori) -> Glaze(lori, hanni)\nforall x (Absent(x, hanni) and Absent(x, lori) -> Tasteless(lori))\nforall x (Absent(x, lori) -> Fornicate(lori, hanni))\n\nAbsent(hanni, lori)\n\ntherefore Absent(hanni, lori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The libbey is cloaked. The libbey character the heida. The heida character the libbey. If the libbey is cloaked then the libbey haunt the heida. If something footslog the heida then it character the libbey. If something footslog the heida then it character the heida. If the heida character the libbey and the libbey is lumpish then the libbey haunt the heida. If something character the heida and it character the libbey then the libbey is adynamic. If something character the libbey then the libbey footslog the heida. The heida does not visit the libbey.", "logic": "\nCloaked(libbey)\nCharacter(libbey, heida)\nCharacter(heida, libbey)\nCloaked(libbey) -> Haunt(libbey, heida)\nforall x (Footslog(x, heida) -> Character(x, libbey))\nforall x (Footslog(x, heida) -> Character(x, heida))\nCharacter(heida, libbey) and Lumpish(libbey) -> Haunt(libbey, heida)\nforall x (Character(x, heida) and Character(x, libbey) -> Adynamic(libbey))\nforall x (Character(x, libbey) -> Footslog(libbey, heida))\n\nnot Character(heida, libbey)\n\ntherefore Character(heida, libbey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The tonie is monogamous. The tonie nosedive the mercedes. The mercedes nosedive the tonie. If the tonie is monogamous then the tonie galumph the mercedes. If something dehisce the mercedes then it nosedive the tonie. If something dehisce the mercedes then it nosedive the mercedes. If the mercedes nosedive the tonie and the tonie is monovalent then the tonie galumph the mercedes. If something nosedive the mercedes and it nosedive the tonie then the tonie is pupal. If something nosedive the tonie then the tonie dehisce the mercedes. The tonie galumph the mercedes.", "logic": "\nMonogamous(tonie)\nNosedive(tonie, mercedes)\nNosedive(mercedes, tonie)\nMonogamous(tonie) -> Galumph(tonie, mercedes)\nforall x (Dehisce(x, mercedes) -> Nosedive(x, tonie))\nforall x (Dehisce(x, mercedes) -> Nosedive(x, mercedes))\nNosedive(mercedes, tonie) and Monovalent(tonie) -> Galumph(tonie, mercedes)\nforall x (Nosedive(x, mercedes) and Nosedive(x, tonie) -> Pupal(tonie))\nforall x (Nosedive(x, tonie) -> Dehisce(tonie, mercedes))\n\nGalumph(tonie, mercedes)\n\nMonogamous(tonie) and Monogamous(tonie) -> Galumph(tonie, mercedes) -> therefore Galumph(tonie, mercedes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The aguste is anaglyphic. The aguste relearn the grover. The grover relearn the aguste. If the aguste is anaglyphic then the aguste reanimate the grover. If something merit the grover then it relearn the aguste. If something merit the grover then it relearn the grover. If the grover relearn the aguste and the aguste is ergodic then the aguste reanimate the grover. If something relearn the grover and it relearn the aguste then the aguste is sealed. If something relearn the aguste then the aguste merit the grover. The aguste does not eat the grover.", "logic": "\nAnaglyphic(aguste)\nRelearn(aguste, grover)\nRelearn(grover, aguste)\nAnaglyphic(aguste) -> Reanimate(aguste, grover)\nforall x (Merit(x, grover) -> Relearn(x, aguste))\nforall x (Merit(x, grover) -> Relearn(x, grover))\nRelearn(grover, aguste) and Ergodic(aguste) -> Reanimate(aguste, grover)\nforall x (Relearn(x, grover) and Relearn(x, aguste) -> Sealed(aguste))\nforall x (Relearn(x, aguste) -> Merit(aguste, grover))\n\nnot Reanimate(aguste, grover)\n\nAnaglyphic(aguste) and Anaglyphic(aguste) -> Reanimate(aguste, grover) -> therefore Reanimate(aguste, grover)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The steffane is happy. The steffane interpret the rustie. The rustie interpret the steffane. If the steffane is happy then the steffane defeminise the rustie. If something index the rustie then it interpret the steffane. If something index the rustie then it interpret the rustie. If the rustie interpret the steffane and the steffane is unoiled then the steffane defeminise the rustie. If something interpret the rustie and it interpret the steffane then the steffane is affluent. If something interpret the steffane then the steffane index the rustie. The steffane interpret the steffane.", "logic": "\nHappy(steffane)\nInterpret(steffane, rustie)\nInterpret(rustie, steffane)\nHappy(steffane) -> Defeminise(steffane, rustie)\nforall x (Index(x, rustie) -> Interpret(x, steffane))\nforall x (Index(x, rustie) -> Interpret(x, rustie))\nInterpret(rustie, steffane) and Unoiled(steffane) -> Defeminise(steffane, rustie)\nforall x (Interpret(x, rustie) and Interpret(x, steffane) -> Affluent(steffane))\nforall x (Interpret(x, steffane) -> Index(steffane, rustie))\n\nInterpret(steffane, steffane)\n\nInterpret(rustie, steffane) and forall x (Interpret(x, steffane) -> Index(steffane, rustie)) -> therefore Index(steffane, rustie) Index(steffane, rustie) and forall x (Index(x, rustie) -> Interpret(x, steffane)) -> therefore Interpret(steffane, steffane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The gilda is japanese. The gilda congregate the lisandra. The lisandra congregate the gilda. If the gilda is japanese then the gilda serve the lisandra. If something libel the lisandra then it congregate the gilda. If something libel the lisandra then it congregate the lisandra. If the lisandra congregate the gilda and the gilda is deboned then the gilda serve the lisandra. If something congregate the lisandra and it congregate the gilda then the gilda is asterismal. If something congregate the gilda then the gilda libel the lisandra. The gilda does not visit the gilda.", "logic": "\nJapanese(gilda)\nCongregate(gilda, lisandra)\nCongregate(lisandra, gilda)\nJapanese(gilda) -> Serve(gilda, lisandra)\nforall x (Libel(x, lisandra) -> Congregate(x, gilda))\nforall x (Libel(x, lisandra) -> Congregate(x, lisandra))\nCongregate(lisandra, gilda) and Deboned(gilda) -> Serve(gilda, lisandra)\nforall x (Congregate(x, lisandra) and Congregate(x, gilda) -> Asterismal(gilda))\nforall x (Congregate(x, gilda) -> Libel(gilda, lisandra))\n\nnot Congregate(gilda, gilda)\n\nCongregate(lisandra, gilda) and forall x (Congregate(x, gilda) -> Libel(gilda, lisandra)) -> therefore Libel(gilda, lisandra) Libel(gilda, lisandra) and forall x (Libel(x, lisandra) -> Congregate(x, gilda)) -> therefore Congregate(gilda, gilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The matthias is frumpy. The matthias misalign the lorinda. The lorinda misalign the matthias. If the matthias is frumpy then the matthias widen the lorinda. If something deflower the lorinda then it misalign the matthias. If something deflower the lorinda then it misalign the lorinda. If the lorinda misalign the matthias and the matthias is pleasant then the matthias widen the lorinda. If something misalign the lorinda and it misalign the matthias then the matthias is sleepless. If something misalign the matthias then the matthias deflower the lorinda. The matthias is sleepless.", "logic": "\nFrumpy(matthias)\nMisalign(matthias, lorinda)\nMisalign(lorinda, matthias)\nFrumpy(matthias) -> Widen(matthias, lorinda)\nforall x (Deflower(x, lorinda) -> Misalign(x, matthias))\nforall x (Deflower(x, lorinda) -> Misalign(x, lorinda))\nMisalign(lorinda, matthias) and Pleasant(matthias) -> Widen(matthias, lorinda)\nforall x (Misalign(x, lorinda) and Misalign(x, matthias) -> Sleepless(matthias))\nforall x (Misalign(x, matthias) -> Deflower(matthias, lorinda))\n\nSleepless(matthias)\n\nMisalign(lorinda, matthias) and forall x (Misalign(x, matthias) -> Deflower(matthias, lorinda)) -> therefore Deflower(matthias, lorinda) Deflower(matthias, lorinda) and forall x (Deflower(x, lorinda) -> Misalign(x, matthias)) -> therefore Misalign(matthias, matthias) Misalign(matthias, lorinda) and Misalign(matthias, matthias) and forall x (Misalign(x, lorinda) and Misalign(x, matthias) -> Sleepless(matthias)) -> therefore Sleepless(matthias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The violette is grassroots. The violette abye the bernard. The bernard abye the violette. If the violette is grassroots then the violette disregard the bernard. If something tenant the bernard then it abye the violette. If something tenant the bernard then it abye the bernard. If the bernard abye the violette and the violette is outflowing then the violette disregard the bernard. If something abye the bernard and it abye the violette then the violette is ambient. If something abye the violette then the violette tenant the bernard. The violette is not ambient.", "logic": "\nGrassroots(violette)\nAbye(violette, bernard)\nAbye(bernard, violette)\nGrassroots(violette) -> Disregard(violette, bernard)\nforall x (Tenant(x, bernard) -> Abye(x, violette))\nforall x (Tenant(x, bernard) -> Abye(x, bernard))\nAbye(bernard, violette) and Outflowing(violette) -> Disregard(violette, bernard)\nforall x (Abye(x, bernard) and Abye(x, violette) -> Ambient(violette))\nforall x (Abye(x, violette) -> Tenant(violette, bernard))\n\nnot Ambient(violette)\n\nAbye(bernard, violette) and forall x (Abye(x, violette) -> Tenant(violette, bernard)) -> therefore Tenant(violette, bernard) Tenant(violette, bernard) and forall x (Tenant(x, bernard) -> Abye(x, violette)) -> therefore Abye(violette, violette) Abye(violette, bernard) and Abye(violette, violette) and forall x (Abye(x, bernard) and Abye(x, violette) -> Ambient(violette)) -> therefore Ambient(violette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The vanni is dexterous. The vanni poke the jillene. The jillene poke the vanni. If the vanni is dexterous then the vanni donate the jillene. If something defalcate the jillene then it poke the vanni. If something defalcate the jillene then it poke the jillene. If the jillene poke the vanni and the vanni is acceptable then the vanni donate the jillene. If something poke the jillene and it poke the vanni then the vanni is bilabial. If something poke the vanni then the vanni defalcate the jillene. The jillene does not visit the jillene.", "logic": "\nDexterous(vanni)\nPoke(vanni, jillene)\nPoke(jillene, vanni)\nDexterous(vanni) -> Donate(vanni, jillene)\nforall x (Defalcate(x, jillene) -> Poke(x, vanni))\nforall x (Defalcate(x, jillene) -> Poke(x, jillene))\nPoke(jillene, vanni) and Acceptable(vanni) -> Donate(vanni, jillene)\nforall x (Poke(x, jillene) and Poke(x, vanni) -> Bilabial(vanni))\nforall x (Poke(x, vanni) -> Defalcate(vanni, jillene))\n\nnot Poke(jillene, jillene)\n\nforall x (Defalcate(x, jillene) -> Poke(x, jillene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The elinor is felonious. The elinor demonetise the shana. The shana demonetise the elinor. If the elinor is felonious then the elinor tamp the shana. If something cycle the shana then it demonetise the elinor. If something cycle the shana then it demonetise the shana. If the shana demonetise the elinor and the elinor is prodigious then the elinor tamp the shana. If something demonetise the shana and it demonetise the elinor then the elinor is nimble. If something demonetise the elinor then the elinor cycle the shana. The elinor is cold.", "logic": "\nFelonious(elinor)\nDemonetise(elinor, shana)\nDemonetise(shana, elinor)\nFelonious(elinor) -> Tamp(elinor, shana)\nforall x (Cycle(x, shana) -> Demonetise(x, elinor))\nforall x (Cycle(x, shana) -> Demonetise(x, shana))\nDemonetise(shana, elinor) and Prodigious(elinor) -> Tamp(elinor, shana)\nforall x (Demonetise(x, shana) and Demonetise(x, elinor) -> Nimble(elinor))\nforall x (Demonetise(x, elinor) -> Cycle(elinor, shana))\n\nCold(elinor)\n\nCold(elinor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The rabbi is decided. The rabbi joust the connie. The connie joust the rabbi. If the rabbi is decided then the rabbi yawl the connie. If something degenerate the connie then it joust the rabbi. If something degenerate the connie then it joust the connie. If the connie joust the rabbi and the rabbi is fallen then the rabbi yawl the connie. If something joust the connie and it joust the rabbi then the rabbi is memberless. If something joust the rabbi then the rabbi degenerate the connie. The rabbi does not eat the rabbi.", "logic": "\nDecided(rabbi)\nJoust(rabbi, connie)\nJoust(connie, rabbi)\nDecided(rabbi) -> Yawl(rabbi, connie)\nforall x (Degenerate(x, connie) -> Joust(x, rabbi))\nforall x (Degenerate(x, connie) -> Joust(x, connie))\nJoust(connie, rabbi) and Fallen(rabbi) -> Yawl(rabbi, connie)\nforall x (Joust(x, connie) and Joust(x, rabbi) -> Memberless(rabbi))\nforall x (Joust(x, rabbi) -> Degenerate(rabbi, connie))\n\nnot Yawl(rabbi, rabbi)\n\nnot Yawl(rabbi, rabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The mischa is slithering. The mischa stoop the laurella. The laurella stoop the mischa. If the mischa is slithering then the mischa overspread the laurella. If something autoclave the laurella then it stoop the mischa. If something autoclave the laurella then it stoop the laurella. If the laurella stoop the mischa and the mischa is dickensian then the mischa overspread the laurella. If something stoop the laurella and it stoop the mischa then the mischa is mimic. If something stoop the mischa then the mischa autoclave the laurella. The laurella overspread the mischa.", "logic": "\nSlithering(mischa)\nStoop(mischa, laurella)\nStoop(laurella, mischa)\nSlithering(mischa) -> Overspread(mischa, laurella)\nforall x (Autoclave(x, laurella) -> Stoop(x, mischa))\nforall x (Autoclave(x, laurella) -> Stoop(x, laurella))\nStoop(laurella, mischa) and Dickensian(mischa) -> Overspread(mischa, laurella)\nforall x (Stoop(x, laurella) and Stoop(x, mischa) -> Mimic(mischa))\nforall x (Stoop(x, mischa) -> Autoclave(mischa, laurella))\n\nOverspread(laurella, mischa)\n\nOverspread(laurella, mischa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The iormina is facetious. The iormina stomp the carlie. The carlie stomp the iormina. If the iormina is facetious then the iormina pipe the carlie. If something signal the carlie then it stomp the iormina. If something signal the carlie then it stomp the carlie. If the carlie stomp the iormina and the iormina is peerless then the iormina pipe the carlie. If something stomp the carlie and it stomp the iormina then the iormina is mushy. If something stomp the iormina then the iormina signal the carlie. The carlie is not mushy.", "logic": "\nFacetious(iormina)\nStomp(iormina, carlie)\nStomp(carlie, iormina)\nFacetious(iormina) -> Pipe(iormina, carlie)\nforall x (Signal(x, carlie) -> Stomp(x, iormina))\nforall x (Signal(x, carlie) -> Stomp(x, carlie))\nStomp(carlie, iormina) and Peerless(iormina) -> Pipe(iormina, carlie)\nforall x (Stomp(x, carlie) and Stomp(x, iormina) -> Mushy(iormina))\nforall x (Stomp(x, iormina) -> Signal(iormina, carlie))\n\nnot Mushy(carlie)\n\nnot Mushy(carlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The ardelia is fell. The ardelia explode the mikhail. The mikhail explode the ardelia. If the ardelia is fell then the ardelia powderise the mikhail. If something filtrate the mikhail then it explode the ardelia. If something filtrate the mikhail then it explode the mikhail. If the mikhail explode the ardelia and the ardelia is unmediated then the ardelia powderise the mikhail. If something explode the mikhail and it explode the ardelia then the ardelia is ignescent. If something explode the ardelia then the ardelia filtrate the mikhail. The mikhail filtrate the ardelia.", "logic": "\nFell(ardelia)\nExplode(ardelia, mikhail)\nExplode(mikhail, ardelia)\nFell(ardelia) -> Powderise(ardelia, mikhail)\nforall x (Filtrate(x, mikhail) -> Explode(x, ardelia))\nforall x (Filtrate(x, mikhail) -> Explode(x, mikhail))\nExplode(mikhail, ardelia) and Unmediated(ardelia) -> Powderise(ardelia, mikhail)\nforall x (Explode(x, mikhail) and Explode(x, ardelia) -> Ignescent(ardelia))\nforall x (Explode(x, ardelia) -> Filtrate(ardelia, mikhail))\n\nFiltrate(mikhail, ardelia)\n\nFiltrate(mikhail, ardelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The eloise is shrunken. The eloise browbeat the gussie. The gussie browbeat the eloise. If the eloise is shrunken then the eloise translate the gussie. If something squat the gussie then it browbeat the eloise. If something squat the gussie then it browbeat the gussie. If the gussie browbeat the eloise and the eloise is tetragonal then the eloise translate the gussie. If something browbeat the gussie and it browbeat the eloise then the eloise is damnatory. If something browbeat the eloise then the eloise squat the gussie. The gussie is not round.", "logic": "\nShrunken(eloise)\nBrowbeat(eloise, gussie)\nBrowbeat(gussie, eloise)\nShrunken(eloise) -> Translate(eloise, gussie)\nforall x (Squat(x, gussie) -> Browbeat(x, eloise))\nforall x (Squat(x, gussie) -> Browbeat(x, gussie))\nBrowbeat(gussie, eloise) and Tetragonal(eloise) -> Translate(eloise, gussie)\nforall x (Browbeat(x, gussie) and Browbeat(x, eloise) -> Damnatory(eloise))\nforall x (Browbeat(x, eloise) -> Squat(eloise, gussie))\n\nnot Round(gussie)\n\nnot Round(gussie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The aila is depletable. The aila perturb the kim. The kim perturb the aila. If the aila is depletable then the aila resplend the kim. If something grass the kim then it perturb the aila. If something grass the kim then it perturb the kim. If the kim perturb the aila and the aila is snoopy then the aila resplend the kim. If something perturb the kim and it perturb the aila then the aila is trimmed. If something perturb the aila then the aila grass the kim. The kim is snoopy.", "logic": "\nDepletable(aila)\nPerturb(aila, kim)\nPerturb(kim, aila)\nDepletable(aila) -> Resplend(aila, kim)\nforall x (Grass(x, kim) -> Perturb(x, aila))\nforall x (Grass(x, kim) -> Perturb(x, kim))\nPerturb(kim, aila) and Snoopy(aila) -> Resplend(aila, kim)\nforall x (Perturb(x, kim) and Perturb(x, aila) -> Trimmed(aila))\nforall x (Perturb(x, aila) -> Grass(aila, kim))\n\nSnoopy(kim)\n\nSnoopy(kim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The maisie glass the sallyann. The maisie is plantal. The maisie is not cordiform. The maisie is vaccinated. The maisie burl the sallyann. The sallyann glass the maisie. The sallyann defect the maisie. If someone is vaccinated and they visit the sallyann then the sallyann burl the maisie. If someone defect the maisie and they are plantal then the maisie defect the sallyann. If someone glass the sallyann then they visit the maisie. If someone burl the maisie and the maisie is pursuing then they visit the maisie. If the sallyann is plantal and the sallyann burl the maisie then the sallyann defect the maisie. If someone defect the maisie then they are pursuing. If the maisie does not visit the sallyann then the sallyann is not amalgamate. If someone glass the maisie and they do not see the maisie then they do not see the sallyann. The sallyann glass the maisie.", "logic": "\nGlass(maisie, sallyann)\nPlantal(maisie)\nnot Cordiform(maisie)\nVaccinated(maisie)\nBurl(maisie, sallyann)\nGlass(sallyann, maisie)\nDefect(sallyann, maisie)\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Defect(x, sallyann) -> Burl(sallyann, maisie))\nforall x (Defect(x, maisie) and Plantal(x) -> Defect(maisie, sallyann))\nforall x (Glass(x, sallyann) -> Defect(x, maisie))\nforall x (Burl(x, maisie) and Pursuing(maisie) -> Defect(x, maisie))\nPlantal(sallyann) and Burl(sallyann, maisie) -> Defect(sallyann, maisie)\nforall x (Defect(x, maisie) -> Pursuing(x))\nnot Defect(maisie, sallyann) -> not Amalgamate(sallyann)\nforall x (Glass(x, maisie) and not Burl(x, maisie) -> not Burl(x, sallyann))\n\nGlass(sallyann, maisie)\n\ntherefore Glass(sallyann, maisie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The clarita previse the damien. The clarita is probable. The clarita is not cherubic. The clarita is apogametic. The clarita stimulate the damien. The damien previse the clarita. The damien farrow the clarita. If someone is apogametic and they visit the damien then the damien stimulate the clarita. If someone farrow the clarita and they are probable then the clarita farrow the damien. If someone previse the damien then they visit the clarita. If someone stimulate the clarita and the clarita is pyogenic then they visit the clarita. If the damien is probable and the damien stimulate the clarita then the damien farrow the clarita. If someone farrow the clarita then they are pyogenic. If the clarita does not visit the damien then the damien is not staccato. If someone previse the clarita and they do not see the clarita then they do not see the damien. The clarita is cherubic.", "logic": "\nPrevise(clarita, damien)\nProbable(clarita)\nnot Cherubic(clarita)\nApogametic(clarita)\nStimulate(clarita, damien)\nPrevise(damien, clarita)\nFarrow(damien, clarita)\nforall x (Apogametic(x) and Farrow(x, damien) -> Stimulate(damien, clarita))\nforall x (Farrow(x, clarita) and Probable(x) -> Farrow(clarita, damien))\nforall x (Previse(x, damien) -> Farrow(x, clarita))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, clarita) and Pyogenic(clarita) -> Farrow(x, clarita))\nProbable(damien) and Stimulate(damien, clarita) -> Farrow(damien, clarita)\nforall x (Farrow(x, clarita) -> Pyogenic(x))\nnot Farrow(clarita, damien) -> not Staccato(damien)\nforall x (Previse(x, clarita) and not Stimulate(x, clarita) -> not Stimulate(x, damien))\n\nCherubic(clarita)\n\ntherefore not Cherubic(clarita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The perrine intermarry the nicki. The perrine is kokka. The perrine is not cordial. The perrine is sporty. The perrine transmit the nicki. The nicki intermarry the perrine. The nicki falcon the perrine. If someone is sporty and they visit the nicki then the nicki transmit the perrine. If someone falcon the perrine and they are kokka then the perrine falcon the nicki. If someone intermarry the nicki then they visit the perrine. If someone transmit the perrine and the perrine is smashed then they visit the perrine. If the nicki is kokka and the nicki transmit the perrine then the nicki falcon the perrine. If someone falcon the perrine then they are smashed. If the perrine does not visit the nicki then the nicki is not hygienic. If someone intermarry the perrine and they do not see the perrine then they do not see the nicki. The perrine falcon the perrine.", "logic": "\nIntermarry(perrine, nicki)\nKokka(perrine)\nnot Cordial(perrine)\nSporty(perrine)\nTransmit(perrine, nicki)\nIntermarry(nicki, perrine)\nFalcon(nicki, perrine)\nforall x (Sporty(x) and Falcon(x, nicki) -> Transmit(nicki, perrine))\nforall x (Falcon(x, perrine) and Kokka(x) -> Falcon(perrine, nicki))\nforall x (Intermarry(x, nicki) -> Falcon(x, perrine))\nforall x (Transmit(x, perrine) and Smashed(perrine) -> Falcon(x, perrine))\nKokka(nicki) and Transmit(nicki, perrine) -> Falcon(nicki, perrine)\nforall x (Falcon(x, perrine) -> Smashed(x))\nnot Falcon(perrine, nicki) -> not Hygienic(nicki)\nforall x (Intermarry(x, perrine) and not Transmit(x, perrine) -> not Transmit(x, nicki))\n\nFalcon(perrine, perrine)\n\nIntermarry(perrine, nicki) and forall x (Intermarry(x, nicki) -> Falcon(x, perrine)) -> therefore Falcon(perrine, perrine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The riccardo sprinkle the emili. The riccardo is hymenal. The riccardo is not subgross. The riccardo is determined. The riccardo soup the emili. The emili sprinkle the riccardo. The emili muddy the riccardo. If someone is determined and they visit the emili then the emili soup the riccardo. If someone muddy the riccardo and they are hymenal then the riccardo muddy the emili. If someone sprinkle the emili then they visit the riccardo. If someone soup the riccardo and the riccardo is brindle then they visit the riccardo. If the emili is hymenal and the emili soup the riccardo then the emili muddy the riccardo. If someone muddy the riccardo then they are brindle. If the riccardo does not visit the emili then the emili is not unselected. If someone sprinkle the riccardo and they do not see the riccardo then they do not see the emili. The riccardo does not visit the riccardo.", "logic": "\nSprinkle(riccardo, emili)\nHymenal(riccardo)\nnot Subgross(riccardo)\nDetermined(riccardo)\nSoup(riccardo, emili)\nSprinkle(emili, riccardo)\nMuddy(emili, riccardo)\nforall x (Determined(x) and Muddy(x, emili) -> Soup(emili, riccardo))\nforall x (Muddy(x, riccardo) and Hymenal(x) -> Muddy(riccardo, emili))\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, emili) -> Muddy(x, riccardo))\nforall x (Soup(x, riccardo) and Brindle(riccardo) -> Muddy(x, riccardo))\nHymenal(emili) and Soup(emili, riccardo) -> Muddy(emili, riccardo)\nforall x (Muddy(x, riccardo) -> Brindle(x))\nnot Muddy(riccardo, emili) -> not Unselected(emili)\nforall x (Sprinkle(x, riccardo) and not Soup(x, riccardo) -> not Soup(x, emili))\n\nnot Muddy(riccardo, riccardo)\n\nSprinkle(riccardo, emili) and forall x (Sprinkle(x, emili) -> Muddy(x, riccardo)) -> therefore Muddy(riccardo, riccardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The ray formulate the leigh. The ray is ocellated. The ray is not equivocal. The ray is snuffling. The ray posture the leigh. The leigh formulate the ray. The leigh like the ray. If someone is snuffling and they visit the leigh then the leigh posture the ray. If someone like the ray and they are ocellated then the ray like the leigh. If someone formulate the leigh then they visit the ray. If someone posture the ray and the ray is bony then they visit the ray. If the leigh is ocellated and the leigh posture the ray then the leigh like the ray. If someone like the ray then they are bony. If the ray does not visit the leigh then the leigh is not ignited. If someone formulate the ray and they do not see the ray then they do not see the leigh. The ray like the leigh.", "logic": "\nFormulate(ray, leigh)\nOcellated(ray)\nnot Equivocal(ray)\nSnuffling(ray)\nPosture(ray, leigh)\nFormulate(leigh, ray)\nLike(leigh, ray)\nforall x (Snuffling(x) and Like(x, leigh) -> Posture(leigh, ray))\nforall x (Like(x, ray) and Ocellated(x) -> Like(ray, leigh))\nforall x (Formulate(x, leigh) -> Like(x, ray))\nforall x (Posture(x, ray) and Bony(ray) -> Like(x, ray))\nOcellated(leigh) and Posture(leigh, ray) -> Like(leigh, ray)\nforall x (Like(x, ray) -> Bony(x))\nnot Like(ray, leigh) -> not Ignited(leigh)\nforall x (Formulate(x, ray) and not Posture(x, ray) -> not Posture(x, leigh))\n\nLike(ray, leigh)\n\nFormulate(ray, leigh) and forall x (Formulate(x, leigh) -> Like(x, ray)) -> therefore Like(ray, ray) Like(ray, ray) and Ocellated(ray) and forall x (Like(x, ray) and Ocellated(x) -> Like(ray, leigh)) -> therefore Like(ray, leigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The orion seethe the mildred. The orion is continuant. The orion is not stock. The orion is bulbed. The orion enshrine the mildred. The mildred seethe the orion. The mildred pinnacle the orion. If someone is bulbed and they visit the mildred then the mildred enshrine the orion. If someone pinnacle the orion and they are continuant then the orion pinnacle the mildred. If someone seethe the mildred then they visit the orion. If someone enshrine the orion and the orion is subgross then they visit the orion. If the mildred is continuant and the mildred enshrine the orion then the mildred pinnacle the orion. If someone pinnacle the orion then they are subgross. If the orion does not visit the mildred then the mildred is not sculptured. If someone seethe the orion and they do not see the orion then they do not see the mildred. The orion is not subgross.", "logic": "\nSeethe(orion, mildred)\nContinuant(orion)\nnot Stock(orion)\nBulbed(orion)\nEnshrine(orion, mildred)\nSeethe(mildred, orion)\nPinnacle(mildred, orion)\nforall x (Bulbed(x) and Pinnacle(x, mildred) -> Enshrine(mildred, orion))\nforall x (Pinnacle(x, orion) and Continuant(x) -> Pinnacle(orion, mildred))\nforall x (Seethe(x, mildred) -> Pinnacle(x, orion))\nforall x (Enshrine(x, orion) and Subgross(orion) -> Pinnacle(x, orion))\nContinuant(mildred) and Enshrine(mildred, orion) -> Pinnacle(mildred, orion)\nforall x (Pinnacle(x, orion) -> Subgross(x))\nnot Pinnacle(orion, mildred) -> not Sculptured(mildred)\nforall x (Seethe(x, orion) and not Enshrine(x, orion) -> not Enshrine(x, mildred))\n\nnot Subgross(orion)\n\nSeethe(orion, mildred) and forall x (Seethe(x, mildred) -> Pinnacle(x, orion)) -> therefore Pinnacle(orion, orion) Pinnacle(orion, orion) and forall x (Pinnacle(x, orion) -> Subgross(x)) -> therefore Subgross(orion)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The corilla forfeit the alissa. The corilla is arrant. The corilla is not ancestral. The corilla is sedgy. The corilla source the alissa. The alissa forfeit the corilla. The alissa panic the corilla. If someone is sedgy and they visit the alissa then the alissa source the corilla. If someone panic the corilla and they are arrant then the corilla panic the alissa. If someone forfeit the alissa then they visit the corilla. If someone source the corilla and the corilla is multilane then they visit the corilla. If the alissa is arrant and the alissa source the corilla then the alissa panic the corilla. If someone panic the corilla then they are multilane. If the corilla does not visit the alissa then the alissa is not motherlike. If someone forfeit the corilla and they do not see the corilla then they do not see the alissa. The alissa source the corilla.", "logic": "\nForfeit(corilla, alissa)\nArrant(corilla)\nnot Ancestral(corilla)\nSedgy(corilla)\nSource(corilla, alissa)\nForfeit(alissa, corilla)\nPanic(alissa, corilla)\nforall x (Sedgy(x) and Panic(x, alissa) -> Source(alissa, corilla))\nforall x (Panic(x, corilla) and Arrant(x) -> Panic(corilla, alissa))\nforall x (Forfeit(x, alissa) -> Panic(x, corilla))\nforall x (Source(x, corilla) and Multilane(corilla) -> Panic(x, corilla))\nArrant(alissa) and Source(alissa, corilla) -> Panic(alissa, corilla)\nforall x (Panic(x, corilla) -> Multilane(x))\nnot Panic(corilla, alissa) -> not Motherlike(alissa)\nforall x (Forfeit(x, corilla) and not Source(x, corilla) -> not Source(x, alissa))\n\nSource(alissa, corilla)\n\nForfeit(corilla, alissa) and forall x (Forfeit(x, alissa) -> Panic(x, corilla)) -> therefore Panic(corilla, corilla) Panic(corilla, corilla) and Arrant(corilla) and forall x (Panic(x, corilla) and Arrant(x) -> Panic(corilla, alissa)) -> therefore Panic(corilla, alissa) Sedgy(corilla) and Panic(corilla, alissa) and forall x (Sedgy(x) and Panic(x, alissa) -> Source(alissa, corilla)) -> therefore Source(alissa, corilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The gideon well the havivah. The gideon is barehanded. The gideon is not momentous. The gideon is omissive. The gideon schnorr the havivah. The havivah well the gideon. The havivah venture the gideon. If someone is omissive and they visit the havivah then the havivah schnorr the gideon. If someone venture the gideon and they are barehanded then the gideon venture the havivah. If someone well the havivah then they visit the gideon. If someone schnorr the gideon and the gideon is andante then they visit the gideon. If the havivah is barehanded and the havivah schnorr the gideon then the havivah venture the gideon. If someone venture the gideon then they are andante. If the gideon does not visit the havivah then the havivah is not atheistic. If someone well the gideon and they do not see the gideon then they do not see the havivah. The havivah does not see the gideon.", "logic": "\nWell(gideon, havivah)\nBarehanded(gideon)\nnot Momentous(gideon)\nOmissive(gideon)\nSchnorr(gideon, havivah)\nWell(havivah, gideon)\nVenture(havivah, gideon)\nforall x (Omissive(x) and Venture(x, havivah) -> Schnorr(havivah, gideon))\nforall x (Venture(x, gideon) and Barehanded(x) -> Venture(gideon, havivah))\nforall x (Well(x, havivah) -> Venture(x, gideon))\nforall x (Schnorr(x, gideon) and Andante(gideon) -> Venture(x, gideon))\nBarehanded(havivah) and Schnorr(havivah, gideon) -> Venture(havivah, gideon)\nforall x (Venture(x, gideon) -> Andante(x))\nnot Venture(gideon, havivah) -> not Atheistic(havivah)\nforall x (Well(x, gideon) and not Schnorr(x, gideon) -> not Schnorr(x, havivah))\n\nnot Schnorr(havivah, gideon)\n\nWell(gideon, havivah) and forall x (Well(x, havivah) -> Venture(x, gideon)) -> therefore Venture(gideon, gideon) Venture(gideon, gideon) and Barehanded(gideon) and forall x (Venture(x, gideon) and Barehanded(x) -> Venture(gideon, havivah)) -> therefore Venture(gideon, havivah) Omissive(gideon) and Venture(gideon, havivah) and forall x (Omissive(x) and Venture(x, havivah) -> Schnorr(havivah, gideon)) -> therefore Schnorr(havivah, gideon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The haskel tighten the terrill. The haskel is rarefied. The haskel is not selfish. The haskel is rodlike. The haskel unhorse the terrill. The terrill tighten the haskel. The terrill complot the haskel. If someone is rodlike and they visit the terrill then the terrill unhorse the haskel. If someone complot the haskel and they are rarefied then the haskel complot the terrill. If someone tighten the terrill then they visit the haskel. If someone unhorse the haskel and the haskel is nocturnal then they visit the haskel. If the terrill is rarefied and the terrill unhorse the haskel then the terrill complot the haskel. If someone complot the haskel then they are nocturnal. If the haskel does not visit the terrill then the terrill is not immoveable. If someone tighten the haskel and they do not see the haskel then they do not see the terrill. The haskel does not see the haskel.", "logic": "\nTighten(haskel, terrill)\nRarefied(haskel)\nnot Selfish(haskel)\nRodlike(haskel)\nUnhorse(haskel, terrill)\nTighten(terrill, haskel)\nComplot(terrill, haskel)\nforall x (Rodlike(x) and Complot(x, terrill) -> Unhorse(terrill, haskel))\nforall x (Complot(x, haskel) and Rarefied(x) -> Complot(haskel, terrill))\nforall x (Tighten(x, terrill) -> Complot(x, haskel))\nforall x (Unhorse(x, haskel) and Nocturnal(haskel) -> Complot(x, haskel))\nRarefied(terrill) and Unhorse(terrill, haskel) -> Complot(terrill, haskel)\nforall x (Complot(x, haskel) -> Nocturnal(x))\nnot Complot(haskel, terrill) -> not Immoveable(terrill)\nforall x (Tighten(x, haskel) and not Unhorse(x, haskel) -> not Unhorse(x, terrill))\n\nnot Unhorse(haskel, haskel)\n\nnot Unhorse(haskel, haskel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The thea impanel the lorrayne. The thea is leafy. The thea is not tortured. The thea is addable. The thea hype the lorrayne. The lorrayne impanel the thea. The lorrayne dovetail the thea. If someone is addable and they visit the lorrayne then the lorrayne hype the thea. If someone dovetail the thea and they are leafy then the thea dovetail the lorrayne. If someone impanel the lorrayne then they visit the thea. If someone hype the thea and the thea is outback then they visit the thea. If the lorrayne is leafy and the lorrayne hype the thea then the lorrayne dovetail the thea. If someone dovetail the thea then they are outback. If the thea does not visit the lorrayne then the lorrayne is not defunct. If someone impanel the thea and they do not see the thea then they do not see the lorrayne. The thea impanel the thea.", "logic": "\nImpanel(thea, lorrayne)\nLeafy(thea)\nnot Tortured(thea)\nAddable(thea)\nHype(thea, lorrayne)\nImpanel(lorrayne, thea)\nDovetail(lorrayne, thea)\nforall x (Addable(x) and Dovetail(x, lorrayne) -> Hype(lorrayne, thea))\nforall x (Dovetail(x, thea) and Leafy(x) -> Dovetail(thea, lorrayne))\nforall x (Impanel(x, lorrayne) -> Dovetail(x, thea))\nforall x (Hype(x, thea) and Outback(thea) -> Dovetail(x, thea))\nLeafy(lorrayne) and Hype(lorrayne, thea) -> Dovetail(lorrayne, thea)\nforall x (Dovetail(x, thea) -> Outback(x))\nnot Dovetail(thea, lorrayne) -> not Defunct(lorrayne)\nforall x (Impanel(x, thea) and not Hype(x, thea) -> not Hype(x, lorrayne))\n\nImpanel(thea, thea)\n\nImpanel(thea, thea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The ethelin avianize the shelbi. The ethelin is intriguing. The ethelin is not clownish. The ethelin is wiccan. The ethelin victual the shelbi. The shelbi avianize the ethelin. The shelbi verge the ethelin. If someone is wiccan and they visit the shelbi then the shelbi victual the ethelin. If someone verge the ethelin and they are intriguing then the ethelin verge the shelbi. If someone avianize the shelbi then they visit the ethelin. If someone victual the ethelin and the ethelin is rubbery then they visit the ethelin. If the shelbi is intriguing and the shelbi victual the ethelin then the shelbi verge the ethelin. If someone verge the ethelin then they are rubbery. If the ethelin does not visit the shelbi then the shelbi is not veiled. If someone avianize the ethelin and they do not see the ethelin then they do not see the shelbi. The shelbi is not veiled.", "logic": "\nAvianize(ethelin, shelbi)\nIntriguing(ethelin)\nnot Clownish(ethelin)\nWiccan(ethelin)\nVictual(ethelin, shelbi)\nAvianize(shelbi, ethelin)\nVerge(shelbi, ethelin)\nforall x (Wiccan(x) and Verge(x, shelbi) -> Victual(shelbi, ethelin))\nforall x (Verge(x, ethelin) and Intriguing(x) -> Verge(ethelin, shelbi))\nforall x (Avianize(x, shelbi) -> Verge(x, ethelin))\nforall x (Victual(x, ethelin) and Rubbery(ethelin) -> Verge(x, ethelin))\nIntriguing(shelbi) and Victual(shelbi, ethelin) -> Verge(shelbi, ethelin)\nforall x (Verge(x, ethelin) -> Rubbery(x))\nnot Verge(ethelin, shelbi) -> not Veiled(shelbi)\nforall x (Avianize(x, ethelin) and not Victual(x, ethelin) -> not Victual(x, shelbi))\n\nnot Veiled(shelbi)\n\nnot Veiled(shelbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The rafe stud the sandie. The rafe is crank. The rafe is not plaguy. The rafe is firsthand. The rafe fate the sandie. The sandie stud the rafe. The sandie reassemble the rafe. If someone is firsthand and they visit the sandie then the sandie fate the rafe. If someone reassemble the rafe and they are crank then the rafe reassemble the sandie. If someone stud the sandie then they visit the rafe. If someone fate the rafe and the rafe is natural then they visit the rafe. If the sandie is crank and the sandie fate the rafe then the sandie reassemble the rafe. If someone reassemble the rafe then they are natural. If the rafe does not visit the sandie then the sandie is not roan. If someone stud the rafe and they do not see the rafe then they do not see the sandie. The sandie stud the sandie.", "logic": "\nStud(rafe, sandie)\nCrank(rafe)\nnot Plaguy(rafe)\nFirsthand(rafe)\nFate(rafe, sandie)\nStud(sandie, rafe)\nReassemble(sandie, rafe)\nforall x (Firsthand(x) and Reassemble(x, sandie) -> Fate(sandie, rafe))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, rafe) and Crank(x) -> Reassemble(rafe, sandie))\nforall x (Stud(x, sandie) -> Reassemble(x, rafe))\nforall x (Fate(x, rafe) and Natural(rafe) -> Reassemble(x, rafe))\nCrank(sandie) and Fate(sandie, rafe) -> Reassemble(sandie, rafe)\nforall x (Reassemble(x, rafe) -> Natural(x))\nnot Reassemble(rafe, sandie) -> not Roan(sandie)\nforall x (Stud(x, rafe) and not Fate(x, rafe) -> not Fate(x, sandie))\n\nStud(sandie, sandie)\n\nStud(sandie, sandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The winnie resuspend the hakim. The winnie is mandean. The winnie is not flaring. The winnie is roofed. The winnie demonize the hakim. The hakim resuspend the winnie. The hakim cakewalk the winnie. If someone is roofed and they visit the hakim then the hakim demonize the winnie. If someone cakewalk the winnie and they are mandean then the winnie cakewalk the hakim. If someone resuspend the hakim then they visit the winnie. If someone demonize the winnie and the winnie is hymenal then they visit the winnie. If the hakim is mandean and the hakim demonize the winnie then the hakim cakewalk the winnie. If someone cakewalk the winnie then they are hymenal. If the winnie does not visit the hakim then the hakim is not racist. If someone resuspend the winnie and they do not see the winnie then they do not see the hakim. The hakim is not flaring.", "logic": "\nResuspend(winnie, hakim)\nMandean(winnie)\nnot Flaring(winnie)\nRoofed(winnie)\nDemonize(winnie, hakim)\nResuspend(hakim, winnie)\nCakewalk(hakim, winnie)\nforall x (Roofed(x) and Cakewalk(x, hakim) -> Demonize(hakim, winnie))\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, winnie) and Mandean(x) -> Cakewalk(winnie, hakim))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, hakim) -> Cakewalk(x, winnie))\nforall x (Demonize(x, winnie) and Hymenal(winnie) -> Cakewalk(x, winnie))\nMandean(hakim) and Demonize(hakim, winnie) -> Cakewalk(hakim, winnie)\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, winnie) -> Hymenal(x))\nnot Cakewalk(winnie, hakim) -> not Racist(hakim)\nforall x (Resuspend(x, winnie) and not Demonize(x, winnie) -> not Demonize(x, hakim))\n\nnot Flaring(hakim)\n\nnot Flaring(hakim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The geralda fagot the bride. The geralda is illusional. The geralda is not battered. The geralda is bouncy. The geralda rescue the bride. The bride fagot the geralda. The bride garden the geralda. If someone is bouncy and they visit the bride then the bride rescue the geralda. If someone garden the geralda and they are illusional then the geralda garden the bride. If someone fagot the bride then they visit the geralda. If someone rescue the geralda and the geralda is threescore then they visit the geralda. If the bride is illusional and the bride rescue the geralda then the bride garden the geralda. If someone garden the geralda then they are threescore. If the geralda does not visit the bride then the bride is not wiry. If someone fagot the geralda and they do not see the geralda then they do not see the bride. The bride is illusional.", "logic": "\nFagot(geralda, bride)\nIllusional(geralda)\nnot Battered(geralda)\nBouncy(geralda)\nRescue(geralda, bride)\nFagot(bride, geralda)\nGarden(bride, geralda)\nforall x (Bouncy(x) and Garden(x, bride) -> Rescue(bride, geralda))\nforall x (Garden(x, geralda) and Illusional(x) -> Garden(geralda, bride))\nforall x (Fagot(x, bride) -> Garden(x, geralda))\nforall x (Rescue(x, geralda) and Threescore(geralda) -> Garden(x, geralda))\nIllusional(bride) and Rescue(bride, geralda) -> Garden(bride, geralda)\nforall x (Garden(x, geralda) -> Threescore(x))\nnot Garden(geralda, bride) -> not Wiry(bride)\nforall x (Fagot(x, geralda) and not Rescue(x, geralda) -> not Rescue(x, bride))\n\nIllusional(bride)\n\nIllusional(bride) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The charley polemise the sophia. The charley is watered. The charley is not moderato. The charley is elaborate. The charley settle the sophia. The sophia polemise the charley. The sophia aerify the charley. If someone is elaborate and they visit the sophia then the sophia settle the charley. If someone aerify the charley and they are watered then the charley aerify the sophia. If someone polemise the sophia then they visit the charley. If someone settle the charley and the charley is ablated then they visit the charley. If the sophia is watered and the sophia settle the charley then the sophia aerify the charley. If someone aerify the charley then they are ablated. If the charley does not visit the sophia then the sophia is not vinegarish. If someone polemise the charley and they do not see the charley then they do not see the sophia. The charley is not vinegarish.", "logic": "\nPolemise(charley, sophia)\nWatered(charley)\nnot Moderato(charley)\nElaborate(charley)\nSettle(charley, sophia)\nPolemise(sophia, charley)\nAerify(sophia, charley)\nforall x (Elaborate(x) and Aerify(x, sophia) -> Settle(sophia, charley))\nforall x (Aerify(x, charley) and Watered(x) -> Aerify(charley, sophia))\nforall x (Polemise(x, sophia) -> Aerify(x, charley))\nforall x (Settle(x, charley) and Ablated(charley) -> Aerify(x, charley))\nWatered(sophia) and Settle(sophia, charley) -> Aerify(sophia, charley)\nforall x (Aerify(x, charley) -> Ablated(x))\nnot Aerify(charley, sophia) -> not Vinegarish(sophia)\nforall x (Polemise(x, charley) and not Settle(x, charley) -> not Settle(x, sophia))\n\nnot Vinegarish(charley)\n\nnot Vinegarish(charley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The vallie shark the elfrida. The vallie is grave. The vallie is not albitic. The vallie is mycenaean. The vallie forest the elfrida. The elfrida shark the vallie. The elfrida tunnel the vallie. If someone is mycenaean and they visit the elfrida then the elfrida forest the vallie. If someone tunnel the vallie and they are grave then the vallie tunnel the elfrida. If someone shark the elfrida then they visit the vallie. If someone forest the vallie and the vallie is doting then they visit the vallie. If the elfrida is grave and the elfrida forest the vallie then the elfrida tunnel the vallie. If someone tunnel the vallie then they are doting. If the vallie does not visit the elfrida then the elfrida is not reflex. If someone shark the vallie and they do not see the vallie then they do not see the elfrida. The elfrida forest the elfrida.", "logic": "\nShark(vallie, elfrida)\nGrave(vallie)\nnot Albitic(vallie)\nMycenaean(vallie)\nForest(vallie, elfrida)\nShark(elfrida, vallie)\nTunnel(elfrida, vallie)\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Tunnel(x, elfrida) -> Forest(elfrida, vallie))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, vallie) and Grave(x) -> Tunnel(vallie, elfrida))\nforall x (Shark(x, elfrida) -> Tunnel(x, vallie))\nforall x (Forest(x, vallie) and Doting(vallie) -> Tunnel(x, vallie))\nGrave(elfrida) and Forest(elfrida, vallie) -> Tunnel(elfrida, vallie)\nforall x (Tunnel(x, vallie) -> Doting(x))\nnot Tunnel(vallie, elfrida) -> not Reflex(elfrida)\nforall x (Shark(x, vallie) and not Forest(x, vallie) -> not Forest(x, elfrida))\n\nForest(elfrida, elfrida)\n\nForest(elfrida, elfrida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-675"} {"premises": "The erda tyrannise the ruthanne. The erda tyrannise the zerk. The erda is jaundiced. The ruthanne tyrannise the erda. The ruthanne is jaundiced. The ruthanne flood the erda. The zerk does not eat the ruthanne. The zerk is setose. The zerk is jaundiced. The zerk flood the erda. The zerk upheave the erda. The zerk upheave the ruthanne. If someone is jaundiced then they eat the zerk. If someone upheave the erda and they eat the ruthanne then they see the zerk. If someone upheave the zerk then they are welcoming. If the zerk upheave the erda and the zerk does not eat the ruthanne then the zerk flood the erda. If someone flood the ruthanne and the ruthanne upheave the zerk then they visit the erda. If someone upheave the erda and the erda tyrannise the ruthanne then the erda is setose. The ruthanne tyrannise the erda.", "logic": "\nTyrannise(erda, ruthanne)\nTyrannise(erda, zerk)\nJaundiced(erda)\nTyrannise(ruthanne, erda)\nJaundiced(ruthanne)\nFlood(ruthanne, erda)\nnot Tyrannise(zerk, ruthanne)\nSetose(zerk)\nJaundiced(zerk)\nFlood(zerk, erda)\nUpheave(zerk, erda)\nUpheave(zerk, ruthanne)\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) -> Tyrannise(x, zerk))\nforall x (Upheave(x, erda) and Tyrannise(x, ruthanne) -> Flood(x, zerk))\nforall x (Upheave(x, zerk) -> Welcoming(x))\nUpheave(zerk, erda) and not Tyrannise(zerk, ruthanne) -> Flood(zerk, erda)\nforall x (Flood(x, ruthanne) and Upheave(ruthanne, zerk) -> Upheave(x, erda))\nforall x (Upheave(x, erda) and Tyrannise(erda, ruthanne) -> Setose(erda))\n\nTyrannise(ruthanne, erda)\n\ntherefore Tyrannise(ruthanne, erda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "The fidelity glut the gerhard. The fidelity glut the brana. The fidelity is flightless. The gerhard glut the fidelity. The gerhard is flightless. The gerhard bastardise the fidelity. The brana does not eat the gerhard. The brana is nonverbal. The brana is flightless. The brana bastardise the fidelity. The brana esteem the fidelity. The brana esteem the gerhard. If someone is flightless then they eat the brana. If someone esteem the fidelity and they eat the gerhard then they see the brana. If someone esteem the brana then they are chaetal. If the brana esteem the fidelity and the brana does not eat the gerhard then the brana bastardise the fidelity. If someone bastardise the gerhard and the gerhard esteem the brana then they visit the fidelity. If someone esteem the fidelity and the fidelity glut the gerhard then the fidelity is nonverbal. The fidelity does not eat the gerhard.", "logic": "\nGlut(fidelity, gerhard)\nGlut(fidelity, brana)\nFlightless(fidelity)\nGlut(gerhard, fidelity)\nFlightless(gerhard)\nBastardise(gerhard, fidelity)\nnot Glut(brana, gerhard)\nNonverbal(brana)\nFlightless(brana)\nBastardise(brana, fidelity)\nEsteem(brana, fidelity)\nEsteem(brana, gerhard)\nforall x (Flightless(x) -> Glut(x, brana))\nforall x (Esteem(x, fidelity) and Glut(x, gerhard) -> Bastardise(x, brana))\nforall x (Esteem(x, brana) -> Chaetal(x))\nEsteem(brana, fidelity) and not Glut(brana, gerhard) -> Bastardise(brana, fidelity)\nforall x (Bastardise(x, gerhard) and Esteem(gerhard, brana) -> Esteem(x, fidelity))\nforall x (Esteem(x, fidelity) and Glut(fidelity, gerhard) -> Nonverbal(fidelity))\n\nnot Glut(fidelity, gerhard)\n\ntherefore Glut(fidelity, gerhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "The aamir farce the jacques. The aamir farce the candra. The aamir is rectified. The jacques farce the aamir. The jacques is rectified. The jacques knap the aamir. The candra does not eat the jacques. The candra is unwilled. The candra is rectified. The candra knap the aamir. The candra dynamise the aamir. The candra dynamise the jacques. If someone is rectified then they eat the candra. If someone dynamise the aamir and they eat the jacques then they see the candra. If someone dynamise the candra then they are insomniac. If the candra dynamise the aamir and the candra does not eat the jacques then the candra knap the aamir. If someone knap the jacques and the jacques dynamise the candra then they visit the aamir. If someone dynamise the aamir and the aamir farce the jacques then the aamir is unwilled. The aamir is unwilled.", "logic": "\nFarce(aamir, jacques)\nFarce(aamir, candra)\nRectified(aamir)\nFarce(jacques, aamir)\nRectified(jacques)\nKnap(jacques, aamir)\nnot Farce(candra, jacques)\nUnwilled(candra)\nRectified(candra)\nKnap(candra, aamir)\nDynamise(candra, aamir)\nDynamise(candra, jacques)\nforall x (Rectified(x) -> Farce(x, candra))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, aamir) and Farce(x, jacques) -> Knap(x, candra))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, candra) -> Insomniac(x))\nDynamise(candra, aamir) and not Farce(candra, jacques) -> Knap(candra, aamir)\nforall x (Knap(x, jacques) and Dynamise(jacques, candra) -> Dynamise(x, aamir))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, aamir) and Farce(aamir, jacques) -> Unwilled(aamir))\n\nUnwilled(aamir)\n\nDynamise(candra, aamir) and Farce(aamir, jacques) and forall x (Dynamise(x, aamir) and Farce(aamir, jacques) -> Unwilled(aamir)) -> therefore Unwilled(aamir)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "The ingeberg tramp the miles. The ingeberg tramp the daisi. The ingeberg is ungrateful. The miles tramp the ingeberg. The miles is ungrateful. The miles concertise the ingeberg. The daisi does not eat the miles. The daisi is decussate. The daisi is ungrateful. The daisi concertise the ingeberg. The daisi metallize the ingeberg. The daisi metallize the miles. If someone is ungrateful then they eat the daisi. If someone metallize the ingeberg and they eat the miles then they see the daisi. If someone metallize the daisi then they are eidetic. If the daisi metallize the ingeberg and the daisi does not eat the miles then the daisi concertise the ingeberg. If someone concertise the miles and the miles metallize the daisi then they visit the ingeberg. If someone metallize the ingeberg and the ingeberg tramp the miles then the ingeberg is decussate. The miles does not eat the daisi.", "logic": "\nTramp(ingeberg, miles)\nTramp(ingeberg, daisi)\nUngrateful(ingeberg)\nTramp(miles, ingeberg)\nUngrateful(miles)\nConcertise(miles, ingeberg)\nnot Tramp(daisi, miles)\nDecussate(daisi)\nUngrateful(daisi)\nConcertise(daisi, ingeberg)\nMetallize(daisi, ingeberg)\nMetallize(daisi, miles)\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Tramp(x, daisi))\nforall x (Metallize(x, ingeberg) and Tramp(x, miles) -> Concertise(x, daisi))\nforall x (Metallize(x, daisi) -> Eidetic(x))\nMetallize(daisi, ingeberg) and not Tramp(daisi, miles) -> Concertise(daisi, ingeberg)\nforall x (Concertise(x, miles) and Metallize(miles, daisi) -> Metallize(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Metallize(x, ingeberg) and Tramp(ingeberg, miles) -> Decussate(ingeberg))\n\nnot Tramp(miles, daisi)\n\nUngrateful(miles) and forall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Tramp(x, daisi)) -> therefore Tramp(miles, daisi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "The loraine fuel the guillaume. The loraine fuel the richie. The loraine is uppity. The guillaume fuel the loraine. The guillaume is uppity. The guillaume outvie the loraine. The richie does not eat the guillaume. The richie is dietetic. The richie is uppity. The richie outvie the loraine. The richie immunise the loraine. The richie immunise the guillaume. If someone is uppity then they eat the richie. If someone immunise the loraine and they eat the guillaume then they see the richie. If someone immunise the richie then they are wheelless. If the richie immunise the loraine and the richie does not eat the guillaume then the richie outvie the loraine. If someone outvie the guillaume and the guillaume immunise the richie then they visit the loraine. If someone immunise the loraine and the loraine fuel the guillaume then the loraine is dietetic. The loraine does not visit the loraine.", "logic": "\nFuel(loraine, guillaume)\nFuel(loraine, richie)\nUppity(loraine)\nFuel(guillaume, loraine)\nUppity(guillaume)\nOutvie(guillaume, loraine)\nnot Fuel(richie, guillaume)\nDietetic(richie)\nUppity(richie)\nOutvie(richie, loraine)\nImmunise(richie, loraine)\nImmunise(richie, guillaume)\nforall x (Uppity(x) -> Fuel(x, richie))\nforall x (Immunise(x, loraine) and Fuel(x, guillaume) -> Outvie(x, richie))\nforall x (Immunise(x, richie) -> Wheelless(x))\nImmunise(richie, loraine) and not Fuel(richie, guillaume) -> Outvie(richie, loraine)\nforall x (Outvie(x, guillaume) and Immunise(guillaume, richie) -> Immunise(x, loraine))\nforall x (Immunise(x, loraine) and Fuel(loraine, guillaume) -> Dietetic(loraine))\n\nnot Immunise(loraine, loraine)\n\nforall x (Outvie(x, guillaume) and Immunise(guillaume, richie) -> Immunise(x, loraine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "The caroleen power the cassondra. The caroleen power the lilian. The caroleen is under. The cassondra power the caroleen. The cassondra is under. The cassondra urinate the caroleen. The lilian does not eat the cassondra. The lilian is aerated. The lilian is under. The lilian urinate the caroleen. The lilian schnorr the caroleen. The lilian schnorr the cassondra. If someone is under then they eat the lilian. If someone schnorr the caroleen and they eat the cassondra then they see the lilian. If someone schnorr the lilian then they are unexceeded. If the lilian schnorr the caroleen and the lilian does not eat the cassondra then the lilian urinate the caroleen. If someone urinate the cassondra and the cassondra schnorr the lilian then they visit the caroleen. If someone schnorr the caroleen and the caroleen power the cassondra then the caroleen is aerated. The caroleen urinate the lilian.", "logic": "\nPower(caroleen, cassondra)\nPower(caroleen, lilian)\nUnder(caroleen)\nPower(cassondra, caroleen)\nUnder(cassondra)\nUrinate(cassondra, caroleen)\nnot Power(lilian, cassondra)\nAerated(lilian)\nUnder(lilian)\nUrinate(lilian, caroleen)\nSchnorr(lilian, caroleen)\nSchnorr(lilian, cassondra)\nforall x (Under(x) -> Power(x, lilian))\nforall x (Schnorr(x, caroleen) and Power(x, cassondra) -> Urinate(x, lilian))\nforall x (Schnorr(x, lilian) -> Unexceeded(x))\nSchnorr(lilian, caroleen) and not Power(lilian, cassondra) -> Urinate(lilian, caroleen)\nforall x (Urinate(x, cassondra) and Schnorr(cassondra, lilian) -> Schnorr(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Schnorr(x, caroleen) and Power(caroleen, cassondra) -> Aerated(caroleen))\n\nUrinate(caroleen, lilian)\n\nforall x (Schnorr(x, caroleen) and Power(x, cassondra) -> Urinate(x, lilian)) <- forall x (Urinate(x, cassondra) and Schnorr(cassondra, lilian) -> Schnorr(x, caroleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "The charmian leverage the kelci. The charmian leverage the claretta. The charmian is reflecting. The kelci leverage the charmian. The kelci is reflecting. The kelci match the charmian. The claretta does not eat the kelci. The claretta is stringent. The claretta is reflecting. The claretta match the charmian. The claretta swan the charmian. The claretta swan the kelci. If someone is reflecting then they eat the claretta. If someone swan the charmian and they eat the kelci then they see the claretta. If someone swan the claretta then they are haggard. If the claretta swan the charmian and the claretta does not eat the kelci then the claretta match the charmian. If someone match the kelci and the kelci swan the claretta then they visit the charmian. If someone swan the charmian and the charmian leverage the kelci then the charmian is stringent. The charmian does not eat the charmian.", "logic": "\nLeverage(charmian, kelci)\nLeverage(charmian, claretta)\nReflecting(charmian)\nLeverage(kelci, charmian)\nReflecting(kelci)\nMatch(kelci, charmian)\nnot Leverage(claretta, kelci)\nStringent(claretta)\nReflecting(claretta)\nMatch(claretta, charmian)\nSwan(claretta, charmian)\nSwan(claretta, kelci)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Leverage(x, claretta))\nforall x (Swan(x, charmian) and Leverage(x, kelci) -> Match(x, claretta))\nforall x (Swan(x, claretta) -> Haggard(x))\nSwan(claretta, charmian) and not Leverage(claretta, kelci) -> Match(claretta, charmian)\nforall x (Match(x, kelci) and Swan(kelci, claretta) -> Swan(x, charmian))\nforall x (Swan(x, charmian) and Leverage(charmian, kelci) -> Stringent(charmian))\n\nnot Leverage(charmian, charmian)\n\nnot Leverage(charmian, charmian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "The vicky adjust the alyse. The vicky adjust the maridel. The vicky is negroid. The alyse adjust the vicky. The alyse is negroid. The alyse discover the vicky. The maridel does not eat the alyse. The maridel is uncultured. The maridel is negroid. The maridel discover the vicky. The maridel receipt the vicky. The maridel receipt the alyse. If someone is negroid then they eat the maridel. If someone receipt the vicky and they eat the alyse then they see the maridel. If someone receipt the maridel then they are wizened. If the maridel receipt the vicky and the maridel does not eat the alyse then the maridel discover the vicky. If someone discover the alyse and the alyse receipt the maridel then they visit the vicky. If someone receipt the vicky and the vicky adjust the alyse then the vicky is uncultured. The alyse receipt the maridel.", "logic": "\nAdjust(vicky, alyse)\nAdjust(vicky, maridel)\nNegroid(vicky)\nAdjust(alyse, vicky)\nNegroid(alyse)\nDiscover(alyse, vicky)\nnot Adjust(maridel, alyse)\nUncultured(maridel)\nNegroid(maridel)\nDiscover(maridel, vicky)\nReceipt(maridel, vicky)\nReceipt(maridel, alyse)\nforall x (Negroid(x) -> Adjust(x, maridel))\nforall x (Receipt(x, vicky) and Adjust(x, alyse) -> Discover(x, maridel))\nforall x (Receipt(x, maridel) -> Wizened(x))\nReceipt(maridel, vicky) and not Adjust(maridel, alyse) -> Discover(maridel, vicky)\nforall x (Discover(x, alyse) and Receipt(alyse, maridel) -> Receipt(x, vicky))\nforall x (Receipt(x, vicky) and Adjust(vicky, alyse) -> Uncultured(vicky))\n\nReceipt(alyse, maridel)\n\nReceipt(alyse, maridel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1682"} {"premises": "Neilla is stoppable. Neilla is prudent. Neilla is popish. Neilla is unwaxed. Neilla is randy. Neilla is dumbstruck. Neilla is dependent. Trudi is stoppable. Trudi is prudent. Trudi is popish. Trudi is unwaxed. Trudi is randy. Trudi is dumbstruck. Trudi is dependent. If Neilla is randy then Neilla is unwaxed. Big, popish things are dependent. Big things are randy. Blue things are stoppable. Smart things are prudent. Red things are dumbstruck. If Trudi is prudent then Trudi is stoppable. All popish things are dumbstruck. Neilla is dependent.", "logic": "\nStoppable(neilla)\nPrudent(neilla)\nPopish(neilla)\nUnwaxed(neilla)\nRandy(neilla)\nDumbstruck(neilla)\nDependent(neilla)\nStoppable(trudi)\nPrudent(trudi)\nPopish(trudi)\nUnwaxed(trudi)\nRandy(trudi)\nDumbstruck(trudi)\nDependent(trudi)\nRandy(neilla) -> Unwaxed(neilla)\nforall x (Stoppable(x) and Popish(x) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Stoppable(x) -> Randy(x))\nforall x (Prudent(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nforall x (Dumbstruck(x) -> Prudent(x))\nforall x (Popish(x) -> Dumbstruck(x))\nPrudent(trudi) -> Stoppable(trudi)\nforall x (Popish(x) -> Dumbstruck(x))\n\nDependent(neilla)\n\ntherefore Dependent(neilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1638"} {"premises": "Ainslie is fivefold. Ainslie is dishonored. Ainslie is spinose. Ainslie is bombproof. Ainslie is aery. Ainslie is lateral. Ainslie is according. Danny is fivefold. Danny is dishonored. Danny is spinose. Danny is bombproof. Danny is aery. Danny is lateral. Danny is according. If Ainslie is aery then Ainslie is bombproof. Big, spinose things are according. Big things are aery. Blue things are fivefold. Smart things are dishonored. Red things are lateral. If Danny is dishonored then Danny is fivefold. All spinose things are lateral. Ainslie is not lateral.", "logic": "\nFivefold(ainslie)\nDishonored(ainslie)\nSpinose(ainslie)\nBombproof(ainslie)\nAery(ainslie)\nLateral(ainslie)\nAccording(ainslie)\nFivefold(danny)\nDishonored(danny)\nSpinose(danny)\nBombproof(danny)\nAery(danny)\nLateral(danny)\nAccording(danny)\nAery(ainslie) -> Bombproof(ainslie)\nforall x (Fivefold(x) and Spinose(x) -> According(x))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Aery(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Fivefold(x))\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nforall x (Spinose(x) -> Lateral(x))\nDishonored(danny) -> Fivefold(danny)\nforall x (Spinose(x) -> Lateral(x))\n\nnot Lateral(ainslie)\n\ntherefore Lateral(ainslie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1638"} {"premises": "The lila is depressing. The lila erupt the aram. The aram malnourish the lila. If the lila malnourish the aram then the aram flatter the lila. If something is depressing and it erupt the lila then it does not see the aram. If something is depressing then it erupt the lila. If something malnourish the lila and it is turbinate then it erupt the lila. If the aram malnourish the lila and the aram flatter the lila then the aram is raging. If something erupt the aram then the aram is depressing. If something malnourish the lila and the lila flatter the aram then the lila is turbinate. Kind things are depressing. The lila is depressing.", "logic": "\nDepressing(lila)\nErupt(lila, aram)\nMalnourish(aram, lila)\nMalnourish(lila, aram) -> Flatter(aram, lila)\nforall x (Depressing(x) and Erupt(x, lila) -> not Flatter(x, aram))\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Erupt(x, lila))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, lila) and Turbinate(x) -> Erupt(x, lila))\nMalnourish(aram, lila) and Flatter(aram, lila) -> Raging(aram)\nforall x (Erupt(x, aram) -> Depressing(aram))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, lila) and Flatter(lila, aram) -> Turbinate(lila))\nforall x (Turbinate(x) -> Depressing(x))\n\nDepressing(lila)\n\ntherefore Depressing(lila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The winfield is weakly. The winfield lambast the troy. The troy airfreight the winfield. If the winfield airfreight the troy then the troy lurch the winfield. If something is weakly and it lambast the winfield then it does not see the troy. If something is weakly then it lambast the winfield. If something airfreight the winfield and it is unhewn then it lambast the winfield. If the troy airfreight the winfield and the troy lurch the winfield then the troy is naval. If something lambast the troy then the troy is weakly. If something airfreight the winfield and the winfield lurch the troy then the winfield is unhewn. Kind things are weakly. The troy does not visit the winfield.", "logic": "\nWeakly(winfield)\nLambast(winfield, troy)\nAirfreight(troy, winfield)\nAirfreight(winfield, troy) -> Lurch(troy, winfield)\nforall x (Weakly(x) and Lambast(x, winfield) -> not Lurch(x, troy))\nforall x (Weakly(x) -> Lambast(x, winfield))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, winfield) and Unhewn(x) -> Lambast(x, winfield))\nAirfreight(troy, winfield) and Lurch(troy, winfield) -> Naval(troy)\nforall x (Lambast(x, troy) -> Weakly(troy))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, winfield) and Lurch(winfield, troy) -> Unhewn(winfield))\nforall x (Unhewn(x) -> Weakly(x))\n\nnot Airfreight(troy, winfield)\n\ntherefore Airfreight(troy, winfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The carmen is hydrous. The carmen absorb the preston. The preston tinker the carmen. If the carmen tinker the preston then the preston neglect the carmen. If something is hydrous and it absorb the carmen then it does not see the preston. If something is hydrous then it absorb the carmen. If something tinker the carmen and it is lutheran then it absorb the carmen. If the preston tinker the carmen and the preston neglect the carmen then the preston is sciolistic. If something absorb the preston then the preston is hydrous. If something tinker the carmen and the carmen neglect the preston then the carmen is lutheran. Kind things are hydrous. The carmen absorb the carmen.", "logic": "\nHydrous(carmen)\nAbsorb(carmen, preston)\nTinker(preston, carmen)\nTinker(carmen, preston) -> Neglect(preston, carmen)\nforall x (Hydrous(x) and Absorb(x, carmen) -> not Neglect(x, preston))\nforall x (Hydrous(x) -> Absorb(x, carmen))\nforall x (Tinker(x, carmen) and Lutheran(x) -> Absorb(x, carmen))\nTinker(preston, carmen) and Neglect(preston, carmen) -> Sciolistic(preston)\nforall x (Absorb(x, preston) -> Hydrous(preston))\nforall x (Tinker(x, carmen) and Neglect(carmen, preston) -> Lutheran(carmen))\nforall x (Lutheran(x) -> Hydrous(x))\n\nAbsorb(carmen, carmen)\n\nHydrous(carmen) and forall x (Hydrous(x) -> Absorb(x, carmen)) -> therefore Absorb(carmen, carmen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The martino is tiptop. The martino syncretize the jaquelin. The jaquelin blog the martino. If the martino blog the jaquelin then the jaquelin retry the martino. If something is tiptop and it syncretize the martino then it does not see the jaquelin. If something is tiptop then it syncretize the martino. If something blog the martino and it is overriding then it syncretize the martino. If the jaquelin blog the martino and the jaquelin retry the martino then the jaquelin is attenuate. If something syncretize the jaquelin then the jaquelin is tiptop. If something blog the martino and the martino retry the jaquelin then the martino is overriding. Kind things are tiptop. The jaquelin is not tiptop.", "logic": "\nTiptop(martino)\nSyncretize(martino, jaquelin)\nBlog(jaquelin, martino)\nBlog(martino, jaquelin) -> Retry(jaquelin, martino)\nforall x (Tiptop(x) and Syncretize(x, martino) -> not Retry(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Tiptop(x) -> Syncretize(x, martino))\nforall x (Blog(x, martino) and Overriding(x) -> Syncretize(x, martino))\nBlog(jaquelin, martino) and Retry(jaquelin, martino) -> Attenuate(jaquelin)\nforall x (Syncretize(x, jaquelin) -> Tiptop(jaquelin))\nforall x (Blog(x, martino) and Retry(martino, jaquelin) -> Overriding(martino))\nforall x (Overriding(x) -> Tiptop(x))\n\nnot Tiptop(jaquelin)\n\nSyncretize(martino, jaquelin) and forall x (Syncretize(x, jaquelin) -> Tiptop(jaquelin)) -> therefore Tiptop(jaquelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The udall is spunky. The udall retrofit the ettie. The ettie detour the udall. If the udall detour the ettie then the ettie speck the udall. If something is spunky and it retrofit the udall then it does not see the ettie. If something is spunky then it retrofit the udall. If something detour the udall and it is prenuptial then it retrofit the udall. If the ettie detour the udall and the ettie speck the udall then the ettie is vocal. If something retrofit the ettie then the ettie is spunky. If something detour the udall and the udall speck the ettie then the udall is prenuptial. Kind things are spunky. The udall does not see the ettie.", "logic": "\nSpunky(udall)\nRetrofit(udall, ettie)\nDetour(ettie, udall)\nDetour(udall, ettie) -> Speck(ettie, udall)\nforall x (Spunky(x) and Retrofit(x, udall) -> not Speck(x, ettie))\nforall x (Spunky(x) -> Retrofit(x, udall))\nforall x (Detour(x, udall) and Prenuptial(x) -> Retrofit(x, udall))\nDetour(ettie, udall) and Speck(ettie, udall) -> Vocal(ettie)\nforall x (Retrofit(x, ettie) -> Spunky(ettie))\nforall x (Detour(x, udall) and Speck(udall, ettie) -> Prenuptial(udall))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) -> Spunky(x))\n\nnot Speck(udall, ettie)\n\nSpunky(udall) and forall x (Spunky(x) -> Retrofit(x, udall)) -> therefore Retrofit(udall, udall) Spunky(udall) and Retrofit(udall, udall) and forall x (Spunky(x) and Retrofit(x, udall) -> not Speck(x, ettie)) -> therefore not Speck(udall, ettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The verile is nodular. The verile assail the yetta. The yetta congeal the verile. If the verile congeal the yetta then the yetta roam the verile. If something is nodular and it assail the verile then it does not see the yetta. If something is nodular then it assail the verile. If something congeal the verile and it is winding then it assail the verile. If the yetta congeal the verile and the yetta roam the verile then the yetta is noseless. If something assail the yetta then the yetta is nodular. If something congeal the verile and the verile roam the yetta then the verile is winding. Kind things are nodular. The yetta does not like the verile.", "logic": "\nNodular(verile)\nAssail(verile, yetta)\nCongeal(yetta, verile)\nCongeal(verile, yetta) -> Roam(yetta, verile)\nforall x (Nodular(x) and Assail(x, verile) -> not Roam(x, yetta))\nforall x (Nodular(x) -> Assail(x, verile))\nforall x (Congeal(x, verile) and Winding(x) -> Assail(x, verile))\nCongeal(yetta, verile) and Roam(yetta, verile) -> Noseless(yetta)\nforall x (Assail(x, yetta) -> Nodular(yetta))\nforall x (Congeal(x, verile) and Roam(verile, yetta) -> Winding(verile))\nforall x (Winding(x) -> Nodular(x))\n\nnot Assail(yetta, verile)\n\nAssail(verile, yetta) and forall x (Assail(x, yetta) -> Nodular(yetta)) -> therefore Nodular(yetta) Nodular(yetta) and forall x (Nodular(x) -> Assail(x, verile)) -> therefore Assail(yetta, verile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The grayce is splashed. The grayce decolorize the rhody. The rhody terminate the grayce. If the grayce terminate the rhody then the rhody lifehack the grayce. If something is splashed and it decolorize the grayce then it does not see the rhody. If something is splashed then it decolorize the grayce. If something terminate the grayce and it is winglike then it decolorize the grayce. If the rhody terminate the grayce and the rhody lifehack the grayce then the rhody is unattended. If something decolorize the rhody then the rhody is splashed. If something terminate the grayce and the grayce lifehack the rhody then the grayce is winglike. Kind things are splashed. The rhody does not see the rhody.", "logic": "\nSplashed(grayce)\nDecolorize(grayce, rhody)\nTerminate(rhody, grayce)\nTerminate(grayce, rhody) -> Lifehack(rhody, grayce)\nforall x (Splashed(x) and Decolorize(x, grayce) -> not Lifehack(x, rhody))\nforall x (Splashed(x) -> Decolorize(x, grayce))\nforall x (Terminate(x, grayce) and Winglike(x) -> Decolorize(x, grayce))\nTerminate(rhody, grayce) and Lifehack(rhody, grayce) -> Unattended(rhody)\nforall x (Decolorize(x, rhody) -> Splashed(rhody))\nforall x (Terminate(x, grayce) and Lifehack(grayce, rhody) -> Winglike(grayce))\nforall x (Winglike(x) -> Splashed(x))\n\nnot Lifehack(rhody, rhody)\n\nDecolorize(grayce, rhody) and forall x (Decolorize(x, rhody) -> Splashed(rhody)) -> therefore Splashed(rhody) Decolorize(grayce, rhody) and forall x (Decolorize(x, rhody) -> Splashed(rhody)) -> therefore Splashed(rhody) Splashed(rhody) and forall x (Splashed(x) -> Decolorize(x, grayce)) -> therefore Decolorize(rhody, grayce) Splashed(rhody) and Decolorize(rhody, grayce) and forall x (Splashed(x) and Decolorize(x, grayce) -> not Lifehack(x, rhody)) -> therefore not Lifehack(rhody, rhody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The elias is thousandth. The elias impend the sidonnie. The sidonnie lambaste the elias. If the elias lambaste the sidonnie then the sidonnie reverse the elias. If something is thousandth and it impend the elias then it does not see the sidonnie. If something is thousandth then it impend the elias. If something lambaste the elias and it is galactic then it impend the elias. If the sidonnie lambaste the elias and the sidonnie reverse the elias then the sidonnie is dandyish. If something impend the sidonnie then the sidonnie is thousandth. If something lambaste the elias and the elias reverse the sidonnie then the elias is galactic. Kind things are thousandth. The sidonnie reverse the sidonnie.", "logic": "\nThousandth(elias)\nImpend(elias, sidonnie)\nLambaste(sidonnie, elias)\nLambaste(elias, sidonnie) -> Reverse(sidonnie, elias)\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Impend(x, elias) -> not Reverse(x, sidonnie))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) -> Impend(x, elias))\nforall x (Lambaste(x, elias) and Galactic(x) -> Impend(x, elias))\nLambaste(sidonnie, elias) and Reverse(sidonnie, elias) -> Dandyish(sidonnie)\nforall x (Impend(x, sidonnie) -> Thousandth(sidonnie))\nforall x (Lambaste(x, elias) and Reverse(elias, sidonnie) -> Galactic(elias))\nforall x (Galactic(x) -> Thousandth(x))\n\nReverse(sidonnie, sidonnie)\n\nImpend(elias, sidonnie) and forall x (Impend(x, sidonnie) -> Thousandth(sidonnie)) -> therefore Thousandth(sidonnie) Impend(elias, sidonnie) and forall x (Impend(x, sidonnie) -> Thousandth(sidonnie)) -> therefore Thousandth(sidonnie) Thousandth(sidonnie) and forall x (Thousandth(x) -> Impend(x, elias)) -> therefore Impend(sidonnie, elias) Thousandth(sidonnie) and Impend(sidonnie, elias) and forall x (Thousandth(x) and Impend(x, elias) -> not Reverse(x, sidonnie)) -> therefore not Reverse(sidonnie, sidonnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The butch is meddlesome. The butch conceive the kizzie. The kizzie screw the butch. If the butch screw the kizzie then the kizzie federalise the butch. If something is meddlesome and it conceive the butch then it does not see the kizzie. If something is meddlesome then it conceive the butch. If something screw the butch and it is bistred then it conceive the butch. If the kizzie screw the butch and the kizzie federalise the butch then the kizzie is enchained. If something conceive the kizzie then the kizzie is meddlesome. If something screw the butch and the butch federalise the kizzie then the butch is bistred. Kind things are meddlesome. The kizzie is not enchained.", "logic": "\nMeddlesome(butch)\nConceive(butch, kizzie)\nScrew(kizzie, butch)\nScrew(butch, kizzie) -> Federalise(kizzie, butch)\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) and Conceive(x, butch) -> not Federalise(x, kizzie))\nforall x (Meddlesome(x) -> Conceive(x, butch))\nforall x (Screw(x, butch) and Bistred(x) -> Conceive(x, butch))\nScrew(kizzie, butch) and Federalise(kizzie, butch) -> Enchained(kizzie)\nforall x (Conceive(x, kizzie) -> Meddlesome(kizzie))\nforall x (Screw(x, butch) and Federalise(butch, kizzie) -> Bistred(butch))\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> Meddlesome(x))\n\nnot Enchained(kizzie)\n\nScrew(kizzie, butch) and Federalise(kizzie, butch) -> Enchained(kizzie) <- Screw(butch, kizzie) -> Federalise(kizzie, butch) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The fanchon is coexisting. The fanchon sodomise the bernete. The bernete lour the fanchon. If the fanchon lour the bernete then the bernete incline the fanchon. If something is coexisting and it sodomise the fanchon then it does not see the bernete. If something is coexisting then it sodomise the fanchon. If something lour the fanchon and it is lowborn then it sodomise the fanchon. If the bernete lour the fanchon and the bernete incline the fanchon then the bernete is tobagonian. If something sodomise the bernete then the bernete is coexisting. If something lour the fanchon and the fanchon incline the bernete then the fanchon is lowborn. Kind things are coexisting. The bernete incline the fanchon.", "logic": "\nCoexisting(fanchon)\nSodomise(fanchon, bernete)\nLour(bernete, fanchon)\nLour(fanchon, bernete) -> Incline(bernete, fanchon)\nforall x (Coexisting(x) and Sodomise(x, fanchon) -> not Incline(x, bernete))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) -> Sodomise(x, fanchon))\nforall x (Lour(x, fanchon) and Lowborn(x) -> Sodomise(x, fanchon))\nLour(bernete, fanchon) and Incline(bernete, fanchon) -> Tobagonian(bernete)\nforall x (Sodomise(x, bernete) -> Coexisting(bernete))\nforall x (Lour(x, fanchon) and Incline(fanchon, bernete) -> Lowborn(fanchon))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Coexisting(x))\n\nIncline(bernete, fanchon)\n\nLour(fanchon, bernete) -> Incline(bernete, fanchon) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The candis is slatternly. The candis tackle the abdel. The abdel inveigh the candis. If the candis inveigh the abdel then the abdel lock the candis. If something is slatternly and it tackle the candis then it does not see the abdel. If something is slatternly then it tackle the candis. If something inveigh the candis and it is plushy then it tackle the candis. If the abdel inveigh the candis and the abdel lock the candis then the abdel is malaysian. If something tackle the abdel then the abdel is slatternly. If something inveigh the candis and the candis lock the abdel then the candis is plushy. Kind things are slatternly. The candis is not plushy.", "logic": "\nSlatternly(candis)\nTackle(candis, abdel)\nInveigh(abdel, candis)\nInveigh(candis, abdel) -> Lock(abdel, candis)\nforall x (Slatternly(x) and Tackle(x, candis) -> not Lock(x, abdel))\nforall x (Slatternly(x) -> Tackle(x, candis))\nforall x (Inveigh(x, candis) and Plushy(x) -> Tackle(x, candis))\nInveigh(abdel, candis) and Lock(abdel, candis) -> Malaysian(abdel)\nforall x (Tackle(x, abdel) -> Slatternly(abdel))\nforall x (Inveigh(x, candis) and Lock(candis, abdel) -> Plushy(candis))\nforall x (Plushy(x) -> Slatternly(x))\n\nnot Plushy(candis)\n\nforall x (Inveigh(x, candis) and Lock(candis, abdel) -> Plushy(candis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The kylie is unspoiled. The kylie saint the vicky. The vicky partake the kylie. If the kylie partake the vicky then the vicky unclasp the kylie. If something is unspoiled and it saint the kylie then it does not see the vicky. If something is unspoiled then it saint the kylie. If something partake the kylie and it is fisheye then it saint the kylie. If the vicky partake the kylie and the vicky unclasp the kylie then the vicky is unaffected. If something saint the vicky then the vicky is unspoiled. If something partake the kylie and the kylie unclasp the vicky then the kylie is fisheye. Kind things are unspoiled. The vicky partake the vicky.", "logic": "\nUnspoiled(kylie)\nSaint(kylie, vicky)\nPartake(vicky, kylie)\nPartake(kylie, vicky) -> Unclasp(vicky, kylie)\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) and Saint(x, kylie) -> not Unclasp(x, vicky))\nforall x (Unspoiled(x) -> Saint(x, kylie))\nforall x (Partake(x, kylie) and Fisheye(x) -> Saint(x, kylie))\nPartake(vicky, kylie) and Unclasp(vicky, kylie) -> Unaffected(vicky)\nforall x (Saint(x, vicky) -> Unspoiled(vicky))\nforall x (Partake(x, kylie) and Unclasp(kylie, vicky) -> Fisheye(kylie))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Unspoiled(x))\n\nPartake(vicky, vicky)\n\nPartake(vicky, vicky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The prudy is anaglyphic. The prudy copyright the stephi. The stephi crossbreed the prudy. If the prudy crossbreed the stephi then the stephi reprove the prudy. If something is anaglyphic and it copyright the prudy then it does not see the stephi. If something is anaglyphic then it copyright the prudy. If something crossbreed the prudy and it is secluded then it copyright the prudy. If the stephi crossbreed the prudy and the stephi reprove the prudy then the stephi is unisex. If something copyright the stephi then the stephi is anaglyphic. If something crossbreed the prudy and the prudy reprove the stephi then the prudy is secluded. Kind things are anaglyphic. The prudy does not visit the stephi.", "logic": "\nAnaglyphic(prudy)\nCopyright(prudy, stephi)\nCrossbreed(stephi, prudy)\nCrossbreed(prudy, stephi) -> Reprove(stephi, prudy)\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) and Copyright(x, prudy) -> not Reprove(x, stephi))\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) -> Copyright(x, prudy))\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, prudy) and Secluded(x) -> Copyright(x, prudy))\nCrossbreed(stephi, prudy) and Reprove(stephi, prudy) -> Unisex(stephi)\nforall x (Copyright(x, stephi) -> Anaglyphic(stephi))\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, prudy) and Reprove(prudy, stephi) -> Secluded(prudy))\nforall x (Secluded(x) -> Anaglyphic(x))\n\nnot Crossbreed(prudy, stephi)\n\nnot Crossbreed(prudy, stephi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The natalie is formalized. The natalie irritate the lou. The lou overdrive the natalie. If the natalie overdrive the lou then the lou pounce the natalie. If something is formalized and it irritate the natalie then it does not see the lou. If something is formalized then it irritate the natalie. If something overdrive the natalie and it is residuary then it irritate the natalie. If the lou overdrive the natalie and the lou pounce the natalie then the lou is minty. If something irritate the lou then the lou is formalized. If something overdrive the natalie and the natalie pounce the lou then the natalie is residuary. Kind things are formalized. The natalie is minty.", "logic": "\nFormalized(natalie)\nIrritate(natalie, lou)\nOverdrive(lou, natalie)\nOverdrive(natalie, lou) -> Pounce(lou, natalie)\nforall x (Formalized(x) and Irritate(x, natalie) -> not Pounce(x, lou))\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> Irritate(x, natalie))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, natalie) and Residuary(x) -> Irritate(x, natalie))\nOverdrive(lou, natalie) and Pounce(lou, natalie) -> Minty(lou)\nforall x (Irritate(x, lou) -> Formalized(lou))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, natalie) and Pounce(natalie, lou) -> Residuary(natalie))\nforall x (Residuary(x) -> Formalized(x))\n\nMinty(natalie)\n\nMinty(natalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The jessie is spiral. The jessie menstruate the bryce. The bryce stand the jessie. If the jessie stand the bryce then the bryce summarize the jessie. If something is spiral and it menstruate the jessie then it does not see the bryce. If something is spiral then it menstruate the jessie. If something stand the jessie and it is toothy then it menstruate the jessie. If the bryce stand the jessie and the bryce summarize the jessie then the bryce is gone. If something menstruate the bryce then the bryce is spiral. If something stand the jessie and the jessie summarize the bryce then the jessie is toothy. Kind things are spiral. The bryce is not red.", "logic": "\nSpiral(jessie)\nMenstruate(jessie, bryce)\nStand(bryce, jessie)\nStand(jessie, bryce) -> Summarize(bryce, jessie)\nforall x (Spiral(x) and Menstruate(x, jessie) -> not Summarize(x, bryce))\nforall x (Spiral(x) -> Menstruate(x, jessie))\nforall x (Stand(x, jessie) and Toothy(x) -> Menstruate(x, jessie))\nStand(bryce, jessie) and Summarize(bryce, jessie) -> Gone(bryce)\nforall x (Menstruate(x, bryce) -> Spiral(bryce))\nforall x (Stand(x, jessie) and Summarize(jessie, bryce) -> Toothy(jessie))\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Spiral(x))\n\nnot Red(bryce)\n\nnot Red(bryce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "The doralynne is spartan. The doralynne enfilade the gregor. The gregor aggroup the doralynne. If the doralynne aggroup the gregor then the gregor breach the doralynne. If something is spartan and it enfilade the doralynne then it does not see the gregor. If something is spartan then it enfilade the doralynne. If something aggroup the doralynne and it is clueless then it enfilade the doralynne. If the gregor aggroup the doralynne and the gregor breach the doralynne then the gregor is fouled. If something enfilade the gregor then the gregor is spartan. If something aggroup the doralynne and the doralynne breach the gregor then the doralynne is clueless. Kind things are spartan. The gregor enfilade the gregor.", "logic": "\nSpartan(doralynne)\nEnfilade(doralynne, gregor)\nAggroup(gregor, doralynne)\nAggroup(doralynne, gregor) -> Breach(gregor, doralynne)\nforall x (Spartan(x) and Enfilade(x, doralynne) -> not Breach(x, gregor))\nforall x (Spartan(x) -> Enfilade(x, doralynne))\nforall x (Aggroup(x, doralynne) and Clueless(x) -> Enfilade(x, doralynne))\nAggroup(gregor, doralynne) and Breach(gregor, doralynne) -> Fouled(gregor)\nforall x (Enfilade(x, gregor) -> Spartan(gregor))\nforall x (Aggroup(x, doralynne) and Breach(doralynne, gregor) -> Clueless(doralynne))\nforall x (Clueless(x) -> Spartan(x))\n\nEnfilade(gregor, gregor)\n\nEnfilade(gregor, gregor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-514"} {"premises": "Becca is prefatory. Becca is wesleyan. Becca is somnolent. Becca is abnaki. Becca is roiled. Arlo is failing. Arlo is prefatory. Arlo is wesleyan. Arlo is somnolent. Arlo is abnaki. Arlo is roiled. Arlo is medicinal. If Becca is abnaki then Becca is medicinal. If something is failing and roiled then it is medicinal. If something is prefatory then it is somnolent. If something is medicinal then it is failing. Quiet things are prefatory. All medicinal things are wesleyan. Becca is prefatory.", "logic": "\nPrefatory(becca)\nWesleyan(becca)\nSomnolent(becca)\nAbnaki(becca)\nRoiled(becca)\nFailing(arlo)\nPrefatory(arlo)\nWesleyan(arlo)\nSomnolent(arlo)\nAbnaki(arlo)\nRoiled(arlo)\nMedicinal(arlo)\nAbnaki(becca) -> Medicinal(becca)\nforall x (Failing(x) and Roiled(x) -> Medicinal(x))\nforall x (Prefatory(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Failing(x))\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Wesleyan(x))\n\nPrefatory(becca)\n\ntherefore Prefatory(becca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Scotty is attic. Scotty is extrinsic. Scotty is male. Scotty is demagogic. Scotty is objective. Elissa is feigned. Elissa is attic. Elissa is extrinsic. Elissa is male. Elissa is demagogic. Elissa is objective. Elissa is obstructed. If Scotty is demagogic then Scotty is obstructed. If something is feigned and objective then it is obstructed. If something is attic then it is male. If something is obstructed then it is feigned. Quiet things are attic. All obstructed things are extrinsic. Elissa is not feigned.", "logic": "\nAttic(scotty)\nExtrinsic(scotty)\nMale(scotty)\nDemagogic(scotty)\nObjective(scotty)\nFeigned(elissa)\nAttic(elissa)\nExtrinsic(elissa)\nMale(elissa)\nDemagogic(elissa)\nObjective(elissa)\nObstructed(elissa)\nDemagogic(scotty) -> Obstructed(scotty)\nforall x (Feigned(x) and Objective(x) -> Obstructed(x))\nforall x (Attic(x) -> Male(x))\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Attic(x))\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\n\nnot Feigned(elissa)\n\ntherefore Feigned(elissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Dennie is arranged. Dennie is xlvii. Dennie is luscious. Dennie is xerophytic. Dennie is singsong. Lizabeth is sweetened. Lizabeth is arranged. Lizabeth is xlvii. Lizabeth is luscious. Lizabeth is xerophytic. Lizabeth is singsong. Lizabeth is adynamic. If Dennie is xerophytic then Dennie is adynamic. If something is sweetened and singsong then it is adynamic. If something is arranged then it is luscious. If something is adynamic then it is sweetened. Quiet things are arranged. All adynamic things are xlvii. Dennie is adynamic.", "logic": "\nArranged(dennie)\nXlvii(dennie)\nLuscious(dennie)\nXerophytic(dennie)\nSingsong(dennie)\nSweetened(lizabeth)\nArranged(lizabeth)\nXlvii(lizabeth)\nLuscious(lizabeth)\nXerophytic(lizabeth)\nSingsong(lizabeth)\nAdynamic(lizabeth)\nXerophytic(dennie) -> Adynamic(dennie)\nforall x (Sweetened(x) and Singsong(x) -> Adynamic(x))\nforall x (Arranged(x) -> Luscious(x))\nforall x (Adynamic(x) -> Sweetened(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Arranged(x))\nforall x (Adynamic(x) -> Xlvii(x))\n\nAdynamic(dennie)\n\nXerophytic(dennie) and Xerophytic(dennie) -> Adynamic(dennie) -> therefore Adynamic(dennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Sybil is ultimate. Sybil is eleven. Sybil is bovine. Sybil is solid. Sybil is catholic. Catlaina is tearless. Catlaina is ultimate. Catlaina is eleven. Catlaina is bovine. Catlaina is solid. Catlaina is catholic. Catlaina is imposed. If Sybil is solid then Sybil is imposed. If something is tearless and catholic then it is imposed. If something is ultimate then it is bovine. If something is imposed then it is tearless. Quiet things are ultimate. All imposed things are eleven. Sybil is not imposed.", "logic": "\nUltimate(sybil)\nEleven(sybil)\nBovine(sybil)\nSolid(sybil)\nCatholic(sybil)\nTearless(catlaina)\nUltimate(catlaina)\nEleven(catlaina)\nBovine(catlaina)\nSolid(catlaina)\nCatholic(catlaina)\nImposed(catlaina)\nSolid(sybil) -> Imposed(sybil)\nforall x (Tearless(x) and Catholic(x) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Ultimate(x) -> Bovine(x))\nforall x (Imposed(x) -> Tearless(x))\nforall x (Eleven(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Imposed(x) -> Eleven(x))\n\nnot Imposed(sybil)\n\nSolid(sybil) and Solid(sybil) -> Imposed(sybil) -> therefore Imposed(sybil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Tailor is farming. Tailor is embossed. Tailor is blamed. Tailor is cuticular. Tailor is monarchic. Shauna is raddled. Shauna is farming. Shauna is embossed. Shauna is blamed. Shauna is cuticular. Shauna is monarchic. Shauna is patented. If Tailor is cuticular then Tailor is patented. If something is raddled and monarchic then it is patented. If something is farming then it is blamed. If something is patented then it is raddled. Quiet things are farming. All patented things are embossed. Tailor is raddled.", "logic": "\nFarming(tailor)\nEmbossed(tailor)\nBlamed(tailor)\nCuticular(tailor)\nMonarchic(tailor)\nRaddled(shauna)\nFarming(shauna)\nEmbossed(shauna)\nBlamed(shauna)\nCuticular(shauna)\nMonarchic(shauna)\nPatented(shauna)\nCuticular(tailor) -> Patented(tailor)\nforall x (Raddled(x) and Monarchic(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Farming(x) -> Blamed(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Embossed(x) -> Farming(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Embossed(x))\n\nRaddled(tailor)\n\nCuticular(tailor) and Cuticular(tailor) -> Patented(tailor) -> therefore Patented(tailor) Patented(tailor) and forall x (Patented(x) -> Raddled(x)) -> therefore Raddled(tailor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Carleen is motherly. Carleen is monthlong. Carleen is nonthermal. Carleen is contextual. Carleen is quirky. Phylys is bodacious. Phylys is motherly. Phylys is monthlong. Phylys is nonthermal. Phylys is contextual. Phylys is quirky. Phylys is isoclinic. If Carleen is contextual then Carleen is isoclinic. If something is bodacious and quirky then it is isoclinic. If something is motherly then it is nonthermal. If something is isoclinic then it is bodacious. Quiet things are motherly. All isoclinic things are monthlong. Carleen is not bodacious.", "logic": "\nMotherly(carleen)\nMonthlong(carleen)\nNonthermal(carleen)\nContextual(carleen)\nQuirky(carleen)\nBodacious(phylys)\nMotherly(phylys)\nMonthlong(phylys)\nNonthermal(phylys)\nContextual(phylys)\nQuirky(phylys)\nIsoclinic(phylys)\nContextual(carleen) -> Isoclinic(carleen)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and Quirky(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) -> Nonthermal(x))\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nforall x (Monthlong(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Monthlong(x))\n\nnot Bodacious(carleen)\n\nContextual(carleen) and Contextual(carleen) -> Isoclinic(carleen) -> therefore Isoclinic(carleen) Isoclinic(carleen) and forall x (Isoclinic(x) -> Bodacious(x)) -> therefore Bodacious(carleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-399"} {"premises": "Aurilia is egregious. Zoe is cyclonal. Noel is appendaged. Shlomo is algonkian. If someone is replete and arrogant then they are egregious. Nice, bared people are algonkian. Kind people are arrogant. All cyclonal people are appendaged. All arrogant people are replete. All appendaged, arrogant people are egregious. Aurilia is egregious.", "logic": "\nEgregious(aurilia)\nCyclonal(zoe)\nAppendaged(noel)\nAlgonkian(shlomo)\nforall x (Replete(x) and Arrogant(x) -> Egregious(x))\nforall x (Egregious(x) and Bared(x) -> Algonkian(x))\nforall x (Algonkian(x) -> Arrogant(x))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) -> Appendaged(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Replete(x))\nforall x (Appendaged(x) and Arrogant(x) -> Egregious(x))\n\nEgregious(aurilia)\n\ntherefore Egregious(aurilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Maible is premedical. Merrick is dread. Rolland is measly. Matelda is floating. If someone is palpatory and saxatile then they are premedical. Nice, carthusian people are floating. Kind people are saxatile. All dread people are measly. All saxatile people are palpatory. All measly, saxatile people are premedical. Rolland is not measly.", "logic": "\nPremedical(maible)\nDread(merrick)\nMeasly(rolland)\nFloating(matelda)\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Saxatile(x) -> Premedical(x))\nforall x (Premedical(x) and Carthusian(x) -> Floating(x))\nforall x (Floating(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nforall x (Dread(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Palpatory(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) and Saxatile(x) -> Premedical(x))\n\nnot Measly(rolland)\n\ntherefore Measly(rolland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Glory is afflicted. Murdoch is monastical. Tybie is homeless. Darren is malted. If someone is diverting and ballistic then they are afflicted. Nice, punk people are malted. Kind people are ballistic. All monastical people are homeless. All ballistic people are diverting. All homeless, ballistic people are afflicted. Darren is ballistic.", "logic": "\nAfflicted(glory)\nMonastical(murdoch)\nHomeless(tybie)\nMalted(darren)\nforall x (Diverting(x) and Ballistic(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and Punk(x) -> Malted(x))\nforall x (Malted(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Monastical(x) -> Homeless(x))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Diverting(x))\nforall x (Homeless(x) and Ballistic(x) -> Afflicted(x))\n\nBallistic(darren)\n\nMalted(darren) and forall x (Malted(x) -> Ballistic(x)) -> therefore Ballistic(darren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Tomasine is buccal. Tessa is variable. Othilie is zigzag. Martino is polydactyl. If someone is antisocial and rejective then they are buccal. Nice, desolate people are polydactyl. Kind people are rejective. All variable people are zigzag. All rejective people are antisocial. All zigzag, rejective people are buccal. Martino is not rejective.", "logic": "\nBuccal(tomasine)\nVariable(tessa)\nZigzag(othilie)\nPolydactyl(martino)\nforall x (Antisocial(x) and Rejective(x) -> Buccal(x))\nforall x (Buccal(x) and Desolate(x) -> Polydactyl(x))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Rejective(x))\nforall x (Variable(x) -> Zigzag(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nforall x (Zigzag(x) and Rejective(x) -> Buccal(x))\n\nnot Rejective(martino)\n\nPolydactyl(martino) and forall x (Polydactyl(x) -> Rejective(x)) -> therefore Rejective(martino)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Ezechiel is budding. Arie is fibrous. Arnoldo is yeatsian. Dannye is calceiform. If someone is dissident and perirhinal then they are budding. Nice, taunting people are calceiform. Kind people are perirhinal. All fibrous people are yeatsian. All perirhinal people are dissident. All yeatsian, perirhinal people are budding. Dannye is dissident.", "logic": "\nBudding(ezechiel)\nFibrous(arie)\nYeatsian(arnoldo)\nCalceiform(dannye)\nforall x (Dissident(x) and Perirhinal(x) -> Budding(x))\nforall x (Budding(x) and Taunting(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Dissident(x))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and Perirhinal(x) -> Budding(x))\n\nDissident(dannye)\n\nCalceiform(dannye) and forall x (Calceiform(x) -> Perirhinal(x)) -> therefore Perirhinal(dannye) Perirhinal(dannye) and forall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Dissident(x)) -> therefore Dissident(dannye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Kirstin is frizzy. Baily is attentive. Valentine is ruandan. Giana is nineteenth. If someone is comate and revengeful then they are frizzy. Nice, maternal people are nineteenth. Kind people are revengeful. All attentive people are ruandan. All revengeful people are comate. All ruandan, revengeful people are frizzy. Giana is not comate.", "logic": "\nFrizzy(kirstin)\nAttentive(baily)\nRuandan(valentine)\nNineteenth(giana)\nforall x (Comate(x) and Revengeful(x) -> Frizzy(x))\nforall x (Frizzy(x) and Maternal(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Ruandan(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) -> Comate(x))\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Revengeful(x) -> Frizzy(x))\n\nnot Comate(giana)\n\nNineteenth(giana) and forall x (Nineteenth(x) -> Revengeful(x)) -> therefore Revengeful(giana) Revengeful(giana) and forall x (Revengeful(x) -> Comate(x)) -> therefore Comate(giana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Neel is cinnabar. Callie is overriding. Wilburn is cubelike. Aretha is tattered. If someone is bush and disused then they are cinnabar. Nice, lesbian people are tattered. Kind people are disused. All overriding people are cubelike. All disused people are bush. All cubelike, disused people are cinnabar. Aretha is cinnabar.", "logic": "\nCinnabar(neel)\nOverriding(callie)\nCubelike(wilburn)\nTattered(aretha)\nforall x (Bush(x) and Disused(x) -> Cinnabar(x))\nforall x (Cinnabar(x) and Lesbian(x) -> Tattered(x))\nforall x (Tattered(x) -> Disused(x))\nforall x (Overriding(x) -> Cubelike(x))\nforall x (Disused(x) -> Bush(x))\nforall x (Cubelike(x) and Disused(x) -> Cinnabar(x))\n\nCinnabar(aretha)\n\nTattered(aretha) and forall x (Tattered(x) -> Disused(x)) -> therefore Disused(aretha) Disused(aretha) and forall x (Disused(x) -> Bush(x)) -> therefore Bush(aretha) Tattered(aretha) and forall x (Tattered(x) -> Disused(x)) -> therefore Disused(aretha) Bush(aretha) and Disused(aretha) and forall x (Bush(x) and Disused(x) -> Cinnabar(x)) -> therefore Cinnabar(aretha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Briny is affine. Jessalin is mobile. Ediva is benzoic. Rog is unpotted. If someone is announced and emblematic then they are affine. Nice, faineant people are unpotted. Kind people are emblematic. All mobile people are benzoic. All emblematic people are announced. All benzoic, emblematic people are affine. Rog is not affine.", "logic": "\nAffine(briny)\nMobile(jessalin)\nBenzoic(ediva)\nUnpotted(rog)\nforall x (Announced(x) and Emblematic(x) -> Affine(x))\nforall x (Affine(x) and Faineant(x) -> Unpotted(x))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) -> Emblematic(x))\nforall x (Mobile(x) -> Benzoic(x))\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Announced(x))\nforall x (Benzoic(x) and Emblematic(x) -> Affine(x))\n\nnot Affine(rog)\n\nUnpotted(rog) and forall x (Unpotted(x) -> Emblematic(x)) -> therefore Emblematic(rog) Emblematic(rog) and forall x (Emblematic(x) -> Announced(x)) -> therefore Announced(rog) Unpotted(rog) and forall x (Unpotted(x) -> Emblematic(x)) -> therefore Emblematic(rog) Announced(rog) and Emblematic(rog) and forall x (Announced(x) and Emblematic(x) -> Affine(x)) -> therefore Affine(rog)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Nichol is plumate. Roshelle is arrogant. Zia is latinate. Revkah is scandent. If someone is jungian and falling then they are plumate. Nice, gabonese people are scandent. Kind people are falling. All arrogant people are latinate. All falling people are jungian. All latinate, falling people are plumate. Nichol is not latinate.", "logic": "\nPlumate(nichol)\nArrogant(roshelle)\nLatinate(zia)\nScandent(revkah)\nforall x (Jungian(x) and Falling(x) -> Plumate(x))\nforall x (Plumate(x) and Gabonese(x) -> Scandent(x))\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Falling(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Latinate(x))\nforall x (Falling(x) -> Jungian(x))\nforall x (Latinate(x) and Falling(x) -> Plumate(x))\n\nnot Latinate(nichol)\n\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Latinate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Bee is dubitable. Briggs is cloisonne. Adrianna is ossified. Willmott is botryoid. If someone is spastic and onerous then they are dubitable. Nice, drawn people are botryoid. Kind people are onerous. All cloisonne people are ossified. All onerous people are spastic. All ossified, onerous people are dubitable. Bee is botryoid.", "logic": "\nDubitable(bee)\nCloisonne(briggs)\nOssified(adrianna)\nBotryoid(willmott)\nforall x (Spastic(x) and Onerous(x) -> Dubitable(x))\nforall x (Dubitable(x) and Drawn(x) -> Botryoid(x))\nforall x (Botryoid(x) -> Onerous(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Ossified(x))\nforall x (Onerous(x) -> Spastic(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) and Onerous(x) -> Dubitable(x))\n\nBotryoid(bee)\n\nforall x (Dubitable(x) and Drawn(x) -> Botryoid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Bogart is saurian. Ursulina is northbound. Eugen is homoecious. Philipa is unblinking. If someone is cruel and oscine then they are saurian. Nice, smarmy people are unblinking. Kind people are oscine. All northbound people are homoecious. All oscine people are cruel. All homoecious, oscine people are saurian. Eugen is not cruel.", "logic": "\nSaurian(bogart)\nNorthbound(ursulina)\nHomoecious(eugen)\nUnblinking(philipa)\nforall x (Cruel(x) and Oscine(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) and Smarmy(x) -> Unblinking(x))\nforall x (Unblinking(x) -> Oscine(x))\nforall x (Northbound(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Cruel(x))\nforall x (Homoecious(x) and Oscine(x) -> Saurian(x))\n\nnot Cruel(eugen)\n\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Cruel(x)) <- forall x (Unblinking(x) -> Oscine(x)) <- forall x (Saurian(x) and Smarmy(x) -> Unblinking(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Lenore is pituitary. Nigel is presto. Mora is saturnine. Quinton is toned. If someone is syndetic and depilatory then they are pituitary. Nice, clerical people are toned. Kind people are depilatory. All presto people are saturnine. All depilatory people are syndetic. All saturnine, depilatory people are pituitary. Lenore is depilatory.", "logic": "\nPituitary(lenore)\nPresto(nigel)\nSaturnine(mora)\nToned(quinton)\nforall x (Syndetic(x) and Depilatory(x) -> Pituitary(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Clerical(x) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Toned(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nforall x (Presto(x) -> Saturnine(x))\nforall x (Depilatory(x) -> Syndetic(x))\nforall x (Saturnine(x) and Depilatory(x) -> Pituitary(x))\n\nDepilatory(lenore)\n\nforall x (Toned(x) -> Depilatory(x)) <- forall x (Pituitary(x) and Clerical(x) -> Toned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Lolly is torrid. Rosemaria is protozoic. Jackelyn is isoclinic. Shantee is resupine. If someone is anuran and atrial then they are torrid. Nice, bedfast people are resupine. Kind people are atrial. All protozoic people are isoclinic. All atrial people are anuran. All isoclinic, atrial people are torrid. Lolly is not protozoic.", "logic": "\nTorrid(lolly)\nProtozoic(rosemaria)\nIsoclinic(jackelyn)\nResupine(shantee)\nforall x (Anuran(x) and Atrial(x) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Torrid(x) and Bedfast(x) -> Resupine(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) -> Atrial(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\nforall x (Atrial(x) -> Anuran(x))\nforall x (Isoclinic(x) and Atrial(x) -> Torrid(x))\n\nnot Protozoic(lolly)\n\nnot Protozoic(lolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Siegfried is encrusted. Aldrich is coeliac. Christal is alienated. Nadya is wriggly. If someone is myelinated and jobless then they are encrusted. Nice, colourless people are wriggly. Kind people are jobless. All coeliac people are alienated. All jobless people are myelinated. All alienated, jobless people are encrusted. Siegfried is colourless.", "logic": "\nEncrusted(siegfried)\nCoeliac(aldrich)\nAlienated(christal)\nWriggly(nadya)\nforall x (Myelinated(x) and Jobless(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and Colourless(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Wriggly(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Alienated(x) and Jobless(x) -> Encrusted(x))\n\nColourless(siegfried)\n\nColourless(siegfried) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Lowell is midway. Krissy is riming. Jilly is perturbing. Teriann is autoimmune. If someone is briefless and wondering then they are midway. Nice, jain people are autoimmune. Kind people are wondering. All riming people are perturbing. All wondering people are briefless. All perturbing, wondering people are midway. Jilly is not jain.", "logic": "\nMidway(lowell)\nRiming(krissy)\nPerturbing(jilly)\nAutoimmune(teriann)\nforall x (Briefless(x) and Wondering(x) -> Midway(x))\nforall x (Midway(x) and Jain(x) -> Autoimmune(x))\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Wondering(x))\nforall x (Riming(x) -> Perturbing(x))\nforall x (Wondering(x) -> Briefless(x))\nforall x (Perturbing(x) and Wondering(x) -> Midway(x))\n\nnot Jain(jilly)\n\nnot Jain(jilly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Marylou is mutinous. Aguinaldo is unclad. Marnie is thwartwise. Thorny is rotatable. If someone is aetiologic and slothful then they are mutinous. Nice, minatory people are rotatable. Kind people are slothful. All unclad people are thwartwise. All slothful people are aetiologic. All thwartwise, slothful people are mutinous. Thorny is unclad.", "logic": "\nMutinous(marylou)\nUnclad(aguinaldo)\nThwartwise(marnie)\nRotatable(thorny)\nforall x (Aetiologic(x) and Slothful(x) -> Mutinous(x))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Minatory(x) -> Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) -> Slothful(x))\nforall x (Unclad(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Slothful(x) -> Aetiologic(x))\nforall x (Thwartwise(x) and Slothful(x) -> Mutinous(x))\n\nUnclad(thorny)\n\nUnclad(thorny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1874"} {"premises": "Dannie is sanguine. Dannie is apiarian. Antony is acetous. If something is acetous then it is lovesick. Antony is acetous.", "logic": "\nSanguine(dannie)\nApiarian(dannie)\nAcetous(antony)\nforall x (Acetous(x) -> Lovesick(x))\n\nAcetous(antony)\n\ntherefore Acetous(antony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "Tate is casteless. Tate is fluid. Lorine is aggressive. If something is aggressive then it is executive. Tate is not casteless.", "logic": "\nCasteless(tate)\nFluid(tate)\nAggressive(lorine)\nforall x (Aggressive(x) -> Executive(x))\n\nnot Casteless(tate)\n\ntherefore Casteless(tate)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "Sadie is botched. Sadie is pawky. Haydon is defeasible. If something is defeasible then it is grievous. Haydon is grievous.", "logic": "\nBotched(sadie)\nPawky(sadie)\nDefeasible(haydon)\nforall x (Defeasible(x) -> Grievous(x))\n\nGrievous(haydon)\n\nDefeasible(haydon) and forall x (Defeasible(x) -> Grievous(x)) -> therefore Grievous(haydon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "Debby is cassocked. Debby is witty. Tracee is mellowed. If something is mellowed then it is radiate. Tracee is not radiate.", "logic": "\nCassocked(debby)\nWitty(debby)\nMellowed(tracee)\nforall x (Mellowed(x) -> Radiate(x))\n\nnot Radiate(tracee)\n\nMellowed(tracee) and forall x (Mellowed(x) -> Radiate(x)) -> therefore Radiate(tracee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "Phip is etiolate. Phip is unquotable. Felicle is exiguous. If something is exiguous then it is longtime. Phip is not longtime.", "logic": "\nEtiolate(phip)\nUnquotable(phip)\nExiguous(felicle)\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Longtime(x))\n\nnot Longtime(phip)\n\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Longtime(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "Giovanni is airsick. Giovanni is moated. Joao is sturdy. If something is sturdy then it is ascribable. Giovanni is green.", "logic": "\nAirsick(giovanni)\nMoated(giovanni)\nSturdy(joao)\nforall x (Sturdy(x) -> Ascribable(x))\n\nGreen(giovanni)\n\nGreen(giovanni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "Nina is cleanable. Nina is boracic. Ruthi is iraqi. If something is iraqi then it is cordate. Ruthi is not boracic.", "logic": "\nCleanable(nina)\nBoracic(nina)\nIraqi(ruthi)\nforall x (Iraqi(x) -> Cordate(x))\n\nnot Boracic(ruthi)\n\nnot Boracic(ruthi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "Wenda is disjoined. Wenda is unmelodic. Gabe is irritating. If something is irritating then it is conformist. Gabe is white.", "logic": "\nDisjoined(wenda)\nUnmelodic(wenda)\nIrritating(gabe)\nforall x (Irritating(x) -> Conformist(x))\n\nWhite(gabe)\n\nWhite(gabe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1684"} {"premises": "The ileane hawk the willetta. The ileane is spindly. The ileane is adsorbent. The willetta hawk the barn. The willetta is tedious. The willetta jilt the ileane. The carlita hawk the ileane. The carlita is spindly. The carlita is unguided. The carlita grain the ileane. The carlita grain the barn. The carlita jilt the ileane. The barn is documental. The barn is tedious. The barn grain the ileane. The barn jilt the carlita. If the ileane is documental then the ileane jilt the carlita. If someone grain the carlita then they are adsorbent. If someone is adsorbent then they visit the barn. If someone hawk the barn then they like the carlita. If someone grain the barn then they chase the carlita. If someone is unguided and they like the ileane then the ileane grain the barn. The willetta hawk the barn.", "logic": "\nHawk(ileane, willetta)\nSpindly(ileane)\nAdsorbent(ileane)\nHawk(willetta, barn)\nTedious(willetta)\nJilt(willetta, ileane)\nHawk(carlita, ileane)\nSpindly(carlita)\nUnguided(carlita)\nGrain(carlita, ileane)\nGrain(carlita, barn)\nJilt(carlita, ileane)\nDocumental(barn)\nTedious(barn)\nGrain(barn, ileane)\nJilt(barn, carlita)\nDocumental(ileane) -> Jilt(ileane, carlita)\nforall x (Grain(x, carlita) -> Adsorbent(x))\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Jilt(x, barn))\nforall x (Hawk(x, barn) -> Grain(x, carlita))\nforall x (Grain(x, barn) -> Hawk(x, carlita))\nforall x (Unguided(x) and Grain(x, ileane) -> Grain(ileane, barn))\n\nHawk(willetta, barn)\n\ntherefore Hawk(willetta, barn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The guinevere outvie the cindra. The guinevere is unratable. The guinevere is ungenerous. The cindra outvie the orly. The cindra is unlabeled. The cindra mercerise the guinevere. The renata outvie the guinevere. The renata is unratable. The renata is brachial. The renata franchise the guinevere. The renata franchise the orly. The renata mercerise the guinevere. The orly is zairese. The orly is unlabeled. The orly franchise the guinevere. The orly mercerise the renata. If the guinevere is zairese then the guinevere mercerise the renata. If someone franchise the renata then they are ungenerous. If someone is ungenerous then they visit the orly. If someone outvie the orly then they like the renata. If someone franchise the orly then they chase the renata. If someone is brachial and they like the guinevere then the guinevere franchise the orly. The renata is not unratable.", "logic": "\nOutvie(guinevere, cindra)\nUnratable(guinevere)\nUngenerous(guinevere)\nOutvie(cindra, orly)\nUnlabeled(cindra)\nMercerise(cindra, guinevere)\nOutvie(renata, guinevere)\nUnratable(renata)\nBrachial(renata)\nFranchise(renata, guinevere)\nFranchise(renata, orly)\nMercerise(renata, guinevere)\nZairese(orly)\nUnlabeled(orly)\nFranchise(orly, guinevere)\nMercerise(orly, renata)\nZairese(guinevere) -> Mercerise(guinevere, renata)\nforall x (Franchise(x, renata) -> Ungenerous(x))\nforall x (Ungenerous(x) -> Mercerise(x, orly))\nforall x (Outvie(x, orly) -> Franchise(x, renata))\nforall x (Franchise(x, orly) -> Outvie(x, renata))\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Franchise(x, guinevere) -> Franchise(guinevere, orly))\n\nnot Unratable(renata)\n\ntherefore Unratable(renata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The issi reorganise the chadd. The issi is broadside. The issi is belgian. The chadd reorganise the jorie. The chadd is brainsick. The chadd apologize the issi. The doretta reorganise the issi. The doretta is broadside. The doretta is rewarding. The doretta penetrate the issi. The doretta penetrate the jorie. The doretta apologize the issi. The jorie is dependant. The jorie is brainsick. The jorie penetrate the issi. The jorie apologize the doretta. If the issi is dependant then the issi apologize the doretta. If someone penetrate the doretta then they are belgian. If someone is belgian then they visit the jorie. If someone reorganise the jorie then they like the doretta. If someone penetrate the jorie then they chase the doretta. If someone is rewarding and they like the issi then the issi penetrate the jorie. The doretta reorganise the doretta.", "logic": "\nReorganise(issi, chadd)\nBroadside(issi)\nBelgian(issi)\nReorganise(chadd, jorie)\nBrainsick(chadd)\nApologize(chadd, issi)\nReorganise(doretta, issi)\nBroadside(doretta)\nRewarding(doretta)\nPenetrate(doretta, issi)\nPenetrate(doretta, jorie)\nApologize(doretta, issi)\nDependant(jorie)\nBrainsick(jorie)\nPenetrate(jorie, issi)\nApologize(jorie, doretta)\nDependant(issi) -> Apologize(issi, doretta)\nforall x (Penetrate(x, doretta) -> Belgian(x))\nforall x (Belgian(x) -> Apologize(x, jorie))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, jorie) -> Penetrate(x, doretta))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, jorie) -> Reorganise(x, doretta))\nforall x (Rewarding(x) and Penetrate(x, issi) -> Penetrate(issi, jorie))\n\nReorganise(doretta, doretta)\n\nPenetrate(doretta, jorie) and forall x (Penetrate(x, jorie) -> Reorganise(x, doretta)) -> therefore Reorganise(doretta, doretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The garfinkel scrutinise the elka. The garfinkel is appealing. The garfinkel is distant. The elka scrutinise the karlyn. The elka is consecrate. The elka taboo the garfinkel. The matthew scrutinise the garfinkel. The matthew is appealing. The matthew is amebous. The matthew besprinkle the garfinkel. The matthew besprinkle the karlyn. The matthew taboo the garfinkel. The karlyn is numerate. The karlyn is consecrate. The karlyn besprinkle the garfinkel. The karlyn taboo the matthew. If the garfinkel is numerate then the garfinkel taboo the matthew. If someone besprinkle the matthew then they are distant. If someone is distant then they visit the karlyn. If someone scrutinise the karlyn then they like the matthew. If someone besprinkle the karlyn then they chase the matthew. If someone is amebous and they like the garfinkel then the garfinkel besprinkle the karlyn. The garfinkel does not visit the karlyn.", "logic": "\nScrutinise(garfinkel, elka)\nAppealing(garfinkel)\nDistant(garfinkel)\nScrutinise(elka, karlyn)\nConsecrate(elka)\nTaboo(elka, garfinkel)\nScrutinise(matthew, garfinkel)\nAppealing(matthew)\nAmebous(matthew)\nBesprinkle(matthew, garfinkel)\nBesprinkle(matthew, karlyn)\nTaboo(matthew, garfinkel)\nNumerate(karlyn)\nConsecrate(karlyn)\nBesprinkle(karlyn, garfinkel)\nTaboo(karlyn, matthew)\nNumerate(garfinkel) -> Taboo(garfinkel, matthew)\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, matthew) -> Distant(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Taboo(x, karlyn))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, karlyn) -> Besprinkle(x, matthew))\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, karlyn) -> Scrutinise(x, matthew))\nforall x (Amebous(x) and Besprinkle(x, garfinkel) -> Besprinkle(garfinkel, karlyn))\n\nnot Taboo(garfinkel, karlyn)\n\nDistant(garfinkel) and forall x (Distant(x) -> Taboo(x, karlyn)) -> therefore Taboo(garfinkel, karlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The dasha spellbind the ebeneser. The dasha is pending. The dasha is taxpaying. The ebeneser spellbind the fabrice. The ebeneser is chiasmal. The ebeneser vitalize the dasha. The howard spellbind the dasha. The howard is pending. The howard is patented. The howard blackberry the dasha. The howard blackberry the fabrice. The howard vitalize the dasha. The fabrice is unbleached. The fabrice is chiasmal. The fabrice blackberry the dasha. The fabrice vitalize the howard. If the dasha is unbleached then the dasha vitalize the howard. If someone blackberry the howard then they are taxpaying. If someone is taxpaying then they visit the fabrice. If someone spellbind the fabrice then they like the howard. If someone blackberry the fabrice then they chase the howard. If someone is patented and they like the dasha then the dasha blackberry the fabrice. The ebeneser is taxpaying.", "logic": "\nSpellbind(dasha, ebeneser)\nPending(dasha)\nTaxpaying(dasha)\nSpellbind(ebeneser, fabrice)\nChiasmal(ebeneser)\nVitalize(ebeneser, dasha)\nSpellbind(howard, dasha)\nPending(howard)\nPatented(howard)\nBlackberry(howard, dasha)\nBlackberry(howard, fabrice)\nVitalize(howard, dasha)\nUnbleached(fabrice)\nChiasmal(fabrice)\nBlackberry(fabrice, dasha)\nVitalize(fabrice, howard)\nUnbleached(dasha) -> Vitalize(dasha, howard)\nforall x (Blackberry(x, howard) -> Taxpaying(x))\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Vitalize(x, fabrice))\nforall x (Spellbind(x, fabrice) -> Blackberry(x, howard))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, fabrice) -> Spellbind(x, howard))\nforall x (Patented(x) and Blackberry(x, dasha) -> Blackberry(dasha, fabrice))\n\nTaxpaying(ebeneser)\n\nSpellbind(ebeneser, fabrice) and forall x (Spellbind(x, fabrice) -> Blackberry(x, howard)) -> therefore Blackberry(ebeneser, howard) Blackberry(ebeneser, howard) and forall x (Blackberry(x, howard) -> Taxpaying(x)) -> therefore Taxpaying(ebeneser)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The rory formulate the fawne. The rory is sanguine. The rory is motorless. The fawne formulate the ashton. The fawne is serene. The fawne recopy the rory. The micheline formulate the rory. The micheline is sanguine. The micheline is ensuing. The micheline seam the rory. The micheline seam the ashton. The micheline recopy the rory. The ashton is gratuitous. The ashton is serene. The ashton seam the rory. The ashton recopy the micheline. If the rory is gratuitous then the rory recopy the micheline. If someone seam the micheline then they are motorless. If someone is motorless then they visit the ashton. If someone formulate the ashton then they like the micheline. If someone seam the ashton then they chase the micheline. If someone is ensuing and they like the rory then the rory seam the ashton. The fawne is not motorless.", "logic": "\nFormulate(rory, fawne)\nSanguine(rory)\nMotorless(rory)\nFormulate(fawne, ashton)\nSerene(fawne)\nRecopy(fawne, rory)\nFormulate(micheline, rory)\nSanguine(micheline)\nEnsuing(micheline)\nSeam(micheline, rory)\nSeam(micheline, ashton)\nRecopy(micheline, rory)\nGratuitous(ashton)\nSerene(ashton)\nSeam(ashton, rory)\nRecopy(ashton, micheline)\nGratuitous(rory) -> Recopy(rory, micheline)\nforall x (Seam(x, micheline) -> Motorless(x))\nforall x (Motorless(x) -> Recopy(x, ashton))\nforall x (Formulate(x, ashton) -> Seam(x, micheline))\nforall x (Seam(x, ashton) -> Formulate(x, micheline))\nforall x (Ensuing(x) and Seam(x, rory) -> Seam(rory, ashton))\n\nnot Motorless(fawne)\n\nFormulate(fawne, ashton) and forall x (Formulate(x, ashton) -> Seam(x, micheline)) -> therefore Seam(fawne, micheline) Seam(fawne, micheline) and forall x (Seam(x, micheline) -> Motorless(x)) -> therefore Motorless(fawne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The elana bottlefeed the pauletta. The elana is bowing. The elana is outraged. The pauletta bottlefeed the leesa. The pauletta is haploidic. The pauletta frank the elana. The shea bottlefeed the elana. The shea is bowing. The shea is amoebic. The shea topicalize the elana. The shea topicalize the leesa. The shea frank the elana. The leesa is corrective. The leesa is haploidic. The leesa topicalize the elana. The leesa frank the shea. If the elana is corrective then the elana frank the shea. If someone topicalize the shea then they are outraged. If someone is outraged then they visit the leesa. If someone bottlefeed the leesa then they like the shea. If someone topicalize the leesa then they chase the shea. If someone is amoebic and they like the elana then the elana topicalize the leesa. The pauletta frank the leesa.", "logic": "\nBottlefeed(elana, pauletta)\nBowing(elana)\nOutraged(elana)\nBottlefeed(pauletta, leesa)\nHaploidic(pauletta)\nFrank(pauletta, elana)\nBottlefeed(shea, elana)\nBowing(shea)\nAmoebic(shea)\nTopicalize(shea, elana)\nTopicalize(shea, leesa)\nFrank(shea, elana)\nCorrective(leesa)\nHaploidic(leesa)\nTopicalize(leesa, elana)\nFrank(leesa, shea)\nCorrective(elana) -> Frank(elana, shea)\nforall x (Topicalize(x, shea) -> Outraged(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) -> Frank(x, leesa))\nforall x (Bottlefeed(x, leesa) -> Topicalize(x, shea))\nforall x (Topicalize(x, leesa) -> Bottlefeed(x, shea))\nforall x (Amoebic(x) and Topicalize(x, elana) -> Topicalize(elana, leesa))\n\nFrank(pauletta, leesa)\n\nBottlefeed(pauletta, leesa) and forall x (Bottlefeed(x, leesa) -> Topicalize(x, shea)) -> therefore Topicalize(pauletta, shea) Topicalize(pauletta, shea) and forall x (Topicalize(x, shea) -> Outraged(x)) -> therefore Outraged(pauletta) Outraged(pauletta) and forall x (Outraged(x) -> Frank(x, leesa)) -> therefore Frank(pauletta, leesa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The issy snorkel the sondra. The issy is ambrosian. The issy is ambrosian. The sondra snorkel the zebulen. The sondra is dismantled. The sondra brew the issy. The idalia snorkel the issy. The idalia is ambrosian. The idalia is blustering. The idalia namedrop the issy. The idalia namedrop the zebulen. The idalia brew the issy. The zebulen is bronchitic. The zebulen is dismantled. The zebulen namedrop the issy. The zebulen brew the idalia. If the issy is bronchitic then the issy brew the idalia. If someone namedrop the idalia then they are ambrosian. If someone is ambrosian then they visit the zebulen. If someone snorkel the zebulen then they like the idalia. If someone namedrop the zebulen then they chase the idalia. If someone is blustering and they like the issy then the issy namedrop the zebulen. The sondra does not visit the zebulen.", "logic": "\nSnorkel(issy, sondra)\nAmbrosian(issy)\nAmbrosian(issy)\nSnorkel(sondra, zebulen)\nDismantled(sondra)\nBrew(sondra, issy)\nSnorkel(idalia, issy)\nAmbrosian(idalia)\nBlustering(idalia)\nNamedrop(idalia, issy)\nNamedrop(idalia, zebulen)\nBrew(idalia, issy)\nBronchitic(zebulen)\nDismantled(zebulen)\nNamedrop(zebulen, issy)\nBrew(zebulen, idalia)\nBronchitic(issy) -> Brew(issy, idalia)\nforall x (Namedrop(x, idalia) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Brew(x, zebulen))\nforall x (Snorkel(x, zebulen) -> Namedrop(x, idalia))\nforall x (Namedrop(x, zebulen) -> Snorkel(x, idalia))\nforall x (Blustering(x) and Namedrop(x, issy) -> Namedrop(issy, zebulen))\n\nnot Brew(sondra, zebulen)\n\nSnorkel(sondra, zebulen) and forall x (Snorkel(x, zebulen) -> Namedrop(x, idalia)) -> therefore Namedrop(sondra, idalia) Namedrop(sondra, idalia) and forall x (Namedrop(x, idalia) -> Ambrosian(x)) -> therefore Ambrosian(sondra) Ambrosian(sondra) and forall x (Ambrosian(x) -> Brew(x, zebulen)) -> therefore Brew(sondra, zebulen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The susann zest the terrel. The susann is burbling. The susann is brash. The terrel zest the vasili. The terrel is teeming. The terrel diffract the susann. The pip zest the susann. The pip is burbling. The pip is deepening. The pip form the susann. The pip form the vasili. The pip diffract the susann. The vasili is chaotic. The vasili is teeming. The vasili form the susann. The vasili diffract the pip. If the susann is chaotic then the susann diffract the pip. If someone form the pip then they are brash. If someone is brash then they visit the vasili. If someone zest the vasili then they like the pip. If someone form the vasili then they chase the pip. If someone is deepening and they like the susann then the susann form the vasili. The pip does not visit the vasili.", "logic": "\nZest(susann, terrel)\nBurbling(susann)\nBrash(susann)\nZest(terrel, vasili)\nTeeming(terrel)\nDiffract(terrel, susann)\nZest(pip, susann)\nBurbling(pip)\nDeepening(pip)\nForm(pip, susann)\nForm(pip, vasili)\nDiffract(pip, susann)\nChaotic(vasili)\nTeeming(vasili)\nForm(vasili, susann)\nDiffract(vasili, pip)\nChaotic(susann) -> Diffract(susann, pip)\nforall x (Form(x, pip) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Brash(x) -> Diffract(x, vasili))\nforall x (Zest(x, vasili) -> Form(x, pip))\nforall x (Form(x, vasili) -> Zest(x, pip))\nforall x (Deepening(x) and Form(x, susann) -> Form(susann, vasili))\n\nnot Diffract(pip, vasili)\n\nforall x (Brash(x) -> Diffract(x, vasili)) <- forall x (Form(x, pip) -> Brash(x)) <- forall x (Zest(x, vasili) -> Form(x, pip)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The meta open the sadella. The meta is sullen. The meta is leadless. The sadella open the niels. The sadella is temptable. The sadella snuff the meta. The meredith open the meta. The meredith is sullen. The meredith is summary. The meredith skirl the meta. The meredith skirl the niels. The meredith snuff the meta. The niels is stomachal. The niels is temptable. The niels skirl the meta. The niels snuff the meredith. If the meta is stomachal then the meta snuff the meredith. If someone skirl the meredith then they are leadless. If someone is leadless then they visit the niels. If someone open the niels then they like the meredith. If someone skirl the niels then they chase the meredith. If someone is summary and they like the meta then the meta skirl the niels. The niels snuff the niels.", "logic": "\nOpen(meta, sadella)\nSullen(meta)\nLeadless(meta)\nOpen(sadella, niels)\nTemptable(sadella)\nSnuff(sadella, meta)\nOpen(meredith, meta)\nSullen(meredith)\nSummary(meredith)\nSkirl(meredith, meta)\nSkirl(meredith, niels)\nSnuff(meredith, meta)\nStomachal(niels)\nTemptable(niels)\nSkirl(niels, meta)\nSnuff(niels, meredith)\nStomachal(meta) -> Snuff(meta, meredith)\nforall x (Skirl(x, meredith) -> Leadless(x))\nforall x (Leadless(x) -> Snuff(x, niels))\nforall x (Open(x, niels) -> Skirl(x, meredith))\nforall x (Skirl(x, niels) -> Open(x, meredith))\nforall x (Summary(x) and Skirl(x, meta) -> Skirl(meta, niels))\n\nSnuff(niels, niels)\n\nforall x (Leadless(x) -> Snuff(x, niels)) <- forall x (Skirl(x, meredith) -> Leadless(x)) <- forall x (Open(x, niels) -> Skirl(x, meredith)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The danni bounce the barry. The danni is vegetative. The danni is acetonic. The barry bounce the angelica. The barry is seeping. The barry peel the danni. The coriss bounce the danni. The coriss is vegetative. The coriss is chthonian. The coriss author the danni. The coriss author the angelica. The coriss peel the danni. The angelica is anuric. The angelica is seeping. The angelica author the danni. The angelica peel the coriss. If the danni is anuric then the danni peel the coriss. If someone author the coriss then they are acetonic. If someone is acetonic then they visit the angelica. If someone bounce the angelica then they like the coriss. If someone author the angelica then they chase the coriss. If someone is chthonian and they like the danni then the danni author the angelica. The coriss is not acetonic.", "logic": "\nBounce(danni, barry)\nVegetative(danni)\nAcetonic(danni)\nBounce(barry, angelica)\nSeeping(barry)\nPeel(barry, danni)\nBounce(coriss, danni)\nVegetative(coriss)\nChthonian(coriss)\nAuthor(coriss, danni)\nAuthor(coriss, angelica)\nPeel(coriss, danni)\nAnuric(angelica)\nSeeping(angelica)\nAuthor(angelica, danni)\nPeel(angelica, coriss)\nAnuric(danni) -> Peel(danni, coriss)\nforall x (Author(x, coriss) -> Acetonic(x))\nforall x (Acetonic(x) -> Peel(x, angelica))\nforall x (Bounce(x, angelica) -> Author(x, coriss))\nforall x (Author(x, angelica) -> Bounce(x, coriss))\nforall x (Chthonian(x) and Author(x, danni) -> Author(danni, angelica))\n\nnot Acetonic(coriss)\n\nforall x (Author(x, coriss) -> Acetonic(x)) <- forall x (Bounce(x, angelica) -> Author(x, coriss)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The beaufort diagram the claudius. The beaufort is woven. The beaufort is calycine. The claudius diagram the zonda. The claudius is linnaean. The claudius argue the beaufort. The leone diagram the beaufort. The leone is woven. The leone is crabwise. The leone hibachi the beaufort. The leone hibachi the zonda. The leone argue the beaufort. The zonda is puerperal. The zonda is linnaean. The zonda hibachi the beaufort. The zonda argue the leone. If the beaufort is puerperal then the beaufort argue the leone. If someone hibachi the leone then they are calycine. If someone is calycine then they visit the zonda. If someone diagram the zonda then they like the leone. If someone hibachi the zonda then they chase the leone. If someone is crabwise and they like the beaufort then the beaufort hibachi the zonda. The zonda hibachi the leone.", "logic": "\nDiagram(beaufort, claudius)\nWoven(beaufort)\nCalycine(beaufort)\nDiagram(claudius, zonda)\nLinnaean(claudius)\nArgue(claudius, beaufort)\nDiagram(leone, beaufort)\nWoven(leone)\nCrabwise(leone)\nHibachi(leone, beaufort)\nHibachi(leone, zonda)\nArgue(leone, beaufort)\nPuerperal(zonda)\nLinnaean(zonda)\nHibachi(zonda, beaufort)\nArgue(zonda, leone)\nPuerperal(beaufort) -> Argue(beaufort, leone)\nforall x (Hibachi(x, leone) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Calycine(x) -> Argue(x, zonda))\nforall x (Diagram(x, zonda) -> Hibachi(x, leone))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, zonda) -> Diagram(x, leone))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) and Hibachi(x, beaufort) -> Hibachi(beaufort, zonda))\n\nHibachi(zonda, leone)\n\nforall x (Diagram(x, zonda) -> Hibachi(x, leone)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The reiko dispirit the ace. The reiko is suborbital. The reiko is eugenic. The ace dispirit the heloise. The ace is deadly. The ace repair the reiko. The nedi dispirit the reiko. The nedi is suborbital. The nedi is bionic. The nedi eddy the reiko. The nedi eddy the heloise. The nedi repair the reiko. The heloise is stationary. The heloise is deadly. The heloise eddy the reiko. The heloise repair the nedi. If the reiko is stationary then the reiko repair the nedi. If someone eddy the nedi then they are eugenic. If someone is eugenic then they visit the heloise. If someone dispirit the heloise then they like the nedi. If someone eddy the heloise then they chase the nedi. If someone is bionic and they like the reiko then the reiko eddy the heloise. The reiko does not chase the reiko.", "logic": "\nDispirit(reiko, ace)\nSuborbital(reiko)\nEugenic(reiko)\nDispirit(ace, heloise)\nDeadly(ace)\nRepair(ace, reiko)\nDispirit(nedi, reiko)\nSuborbital(nedi)\nBionic(nedi)\nEddy(nedi, reiko)\nEddy(nedi, heloise)\nRepair(nedi, reiko)\nStationary(heloise)\nDeadly(heloise)\nEddy(heloise, reiko)\nRepair(heloise, nedi)\nStationary(reiko) -> Repair(reiko, nedi)\nforall x (Eddy(x, nedi) -> Eugenic(x))\nforall x (Eugenic(x) -> Repair(x, heloise))\nforall x (Dispirit(x, heloise) -> Eddy(x, nedi))\nforall x (Eddy(x, heloise) -> Dispirit(x, nedi))\nforall x (Bionic(x) and Eddy(x, reiko) -> Eddy(reiko, heloise))\n\nnot Dispirit(reiko, reiko)\n\nnot Dispirit(reiko, reiko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The natalee diabolise the tabbi. The natalee is rhinal. The natalee is ridged. The tabbi diabolise the cathyleen. The tabbi is said. The tabbi blind the natalee. The tailor diabolise the natalee. The tailor is rhinal. The tailor is unrecorded. The tailor sniffle the natalee. The tailor sniffle the cathyleen. The tailor blind the natalee. The cathyleen is unafraid. The cathyleen is said. The cathyleen sniffle the natalee. The cathyleen blind the tailor. If the natalee is unafraid then the natalee blind the tailor. If someone sniffle the tailor then they are ridged. If someone is ridged then they visit the cathyleen. If someone diabolise the cathyleen then they like the tailor. If someone sniffle the cathyleen then they chase the tailor. If someone is unrecorded and they like the natalee then the natalee sniffle the cathyleen. The cathyleen sniffle the cathyleen.", "logic": "\nDiabolise(natalee, tabbi)\nRhinal(natalee)\nRidged(natalee)\nDiabolise(tabbi, cathyleen)\nSaid(tabbi)\nBlind(tabbi, natalee)\nDiabolise(tailor, natalee)\nRhinal(tailor)\nUnrecorded(tailor)\nSniffle(tailor, natalee)\nSniffle(tailor, cathyleen)\nBlind(tailor, natalee)\nUnafraid(cathyleen)\nSaid(cathyleen)\nSniffle(cathyleen, natalee)\nBlind(cathyleen, tailor)\nUnafraid(natalee) -> Blind(natalee, tailor)\nforall x (Sniffle(x, tailor) -> Ridged(x))\nforall x (Ridged(x) -> Blind(x, cathyleen))\nforall x (Diabolise(x, cathyleen) -> Sniffle(x, tailor))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, cathyleen) -> Diabolise(x, tailor))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) and Sniffle(x, natalee) -> Sniffle(natalee, cathyleen))\n\nSniffle(cathyleen, cathyleen)\n\nSniffle(cathyleen, cathyleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The sarajane conduct the rutger. The sarajane is religious. The sarajane is reinforced. The rutger conduct the dayna. The rutger is lactogenic. The rutger shin the sarajane. The adi conduct the sarajane. The adi is religious. The adi is perplexing. The adi radiate the sarajane. The adi radiate the dayna. The adi shin the sarajane. The dayna is chromatic. The dayna is lactogenic. The dayna radiate the sarajane. The dayna shin the adi. If the sarajane is chromatic then the sarajane shin the adi. If someone radiate the adi then they are reinforced. If someone is reinforced then they visit the dayna. If someone conduct the dayna then they like the adi. If someone radiate the dayna then they chase the adi. If someone is perplexing and they like the sarajane then the sarajane radiate the dayna. The dayna is not perplexing.", "logic": "\nConduct(sarajane, rutger)\nReligious(sarajane)\nReinforced(sarajane)\nConduct(rutger, dayna)\nLactogenic(rutger)\nShin(rutger, sarajane)\nConduct(adi, sarajane)\nReligious(adi)\nPerplexing(adi)\nRadiate(adi, sarajane)\nRadiate(adi, dayna)\nShin(adi, sarajane)\nChromatic(dayna)\nLactogenic(dayna)\nRadiate(dayna, sarajane)\nShin(dayna, adi)\nChromatic(sarajane) -> Shin(sarajane, adi)\nforall x (Radiate(x, adi) -> Reinforced(x))\nforall x (Reinforced(x) -> Shin(x, dayna))\nforall x (Conduct(x, dayna) -> Radiate(x, adi))\nforall x (Radiate(x, dayna) -> Conduct(x, adi))\nforall x (Perplexing(x) and Radiate(x, sarajane) -> Radiate(sarajane, dayna))\n\nnot Perplexing(dayna)\n\nnot Perplexing(dayna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "The phillipe regenerate the gillan. The phillipe is lentic. The phillipe is ferrous. The gillan regenerate the roseann. The gillan is hesitant. The gillan dialyse the phillipe. The johann regenerate the phillipe. The johann is lentic. The johann is parisian. The johann love the phillipe. The johann love the roseann. The johann dialyse the phillipe. The roseann is argentine. The roseann is hesitant. The roseann love the phillipe. The roseann dialyse the johann. If the phillipe is argentine then the phillipe dialyse the johann. If someone love the johann then they are ferrous. If someone is ferrous then they visit the roseann. If someone regenerate the roseann then they like the johann. If someone love the roseann then they chase the johann. If someone is parisian and they like the phillipe then the phillipe love the roseann. The gillan regenerate the gillan.", "logic": "\nRegenerate(phillipe, gillan)\nLentic(phillipe)\nFerrous(phillipe)\nRegenerate(gillan, roseann)\nHesitant(gillan)\nDialyse(gillan, phillipe)\nRegenerate(johann, phillipe)\nLentic(johann)\nParisian(johann)\nLove(johann, phillipe)\nLove(johann, roseann)\nDialyse(johann, phillipe)\nArgentine(roseann)\nHesitant(roseann)\nLove(roseann, phillipe)\nDialyse(roseann, johann)\nArgentine(phillipe) -> Dialyse(phillipe, johann)\nforall x (Love(x, johann) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Dialyse(x, roseann))\nforall x (Regenerate(x, roseann) -> Love(x, johann))\nforall x (Love(x, roseann) -> Regenerate(x, johann))\nforall x (Parisian(x) and Love(x, phillipe) -> Love(phillipe, roseann))\n\nRegenerate(gillan, gillan)\n\nRegenerate(gillan, gillan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-753"} {"premises": "Elyse is formed. Elyse is deliberate. Elyse is deviant. Elyse is gluttonous. Elyse is oaken. Elyse is suchlike. Brigit is formed. Brigit is deliberate. Brigit is deviant. Brigit is suchlike. Rozina is haggard. Rozina is gluttonous. Rozina is suchlike. Lorain is haggard. Lorain is oaken. If someone is deliberate then they are gluttonous. All gluttonous, oaken people are suchlike. All deliberate people are haggard. If someone is haggard then they are oaken. All gluttonous, deviant people are deliberate. Rough, gluttonous people are deviant. Brigit is formed.", "logic": "\nFormed(elyse)\nDeliberate(elyse)\nDeviant(elyse)\nGluttonous(elyse)\nOaken(elyse)\nSuchlike(elyse)\nFormed(brigit)\nDeliberate(brigit)\nDeviant(brigit)\nSuchlike(brigit)\nHaggard(rozina)\nGluttonous(rozina)\nSuchlike(rozina)\nHaggard(lorain)\nOaken(lorain)\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Gluttonous(x) and Oaken(x) -> Suchlike(x))\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Oaken(x))\nforall x (Gluttonous(x) and Deviant(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nforall x (Oaken(x) and Gluttonous(x) -> Deviant(x))\n\nFormed(brigit)\n\ntherefore Formed(brigit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Tobiah is urinary. Tobiah is antitumour. Tobiah is shamanist. Tobiah is acronymous. Tobiah is monochrome. Tobiah is gratis. Jillene is urinary. Jillene is antitumour. Jillene is shamanist. Jillene is gratis. Leticia is invasive. Leticia is acronymous. Leticia is gratis. Elsinore is invasive. Elsinore is monochrome. If someone is antitumour then they are acronymous. All acronymous, monochrome people are gratis. All antitumour people are invasive. If someone is invasive then they are monochrome. All acronymous, shamanist people are antitumour. Rough, acronymous people are shamanist. Tobiah is not acronymous.", "logic": "\nUrinary(tobiah)\nAntitumour(tobiah)\nShamanist(tobiah)\nAcronymous(tobiah)\nMonochrome(tobiah)\nGratis(tobiah)\nUrinary(jillene)\nAntitumour(jillene)\nShamanist(jillene)\nGratis(jillene)\nInvasive(leticia)\nAcronymous(leticia)\nGratis(leticia)\nInvasive(elsinore)\nMonochrome(elsinore)\nforall x (Antitumour(x) -> Acronymous(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) and Monochrome(x) -> Gratis(x))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) -> Invasive(x))\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) and Shamanist(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) and Acronymous(x) -> Shamanist(x))\n\nnot Acronymous(tobiah)\n\ntherefore Acronymous(tobiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Tabor is outre. Tabor is hypodermic. Tabor is adenoid. Tabor is arborous. Tabor is reassured. Tabor is echoless. Clayborne is outre. Clayborne is hypodermic. Clayborne is adenoid. Clayborne is echoless. Jodie is excitant. Jodie is arborous. Jodie is echoless. Winifred is excitant. Winifred is reassured. If someone is hypodermic then they are arborous. All arborous, reassured people are echoless. All hypodermic people are excitant. If someone is excitant then they are reassured. All arborous, adenoid people are hypodermic. Rough, arborous people are adenoid. Jodie is reassured.", "logic": "\nOutre(tabor)\nHypodermic(tabor)\nAdenoid(tabor)\nArborous(tabor)\nReassured(tabor)\nEcholess(tabor)\nOutre(clayborne)\nHypodermic(clayborne)\nAdenoid(clayborne)\nEcholess(clayborne)\nExcitant(jodie)\nArborous(jodie)\nEcholess(jodie)\nExcitant(winifred)\nReassured(winifred)\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) -> Arborous(x))\nforall x (Arborous(x) and Reassured(x) -> Echoless(x))\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Excitant(x) -> Reassured(x))\nforall x (Arborous(x) and Adenoid(x) -> Hypodermic(x))\nforall x (Reassured(x) and Arborous(x) -> Adenoid(x))\n\nReassured(jodie)\n\nExcitant(jodie) and forall x (Excitant(x) -> Reassured(x)) -> therefore Reassured(jodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Loree is colourful. Loree is transonic. Loree is desecrated. Loree is dashed. Loree is overall. Loree is truculent. Cindie is colourful. Cindie is transonic. Cindie is desecrated. Cindie is truculent. Selle is vindicated. Selle is dashed. Selle is truculent. Colleen is vindicated. Colleen is overall. If someone is transonic then they are dashed. All dashed, overall people are truculent. All transonic people are vindicated. If someone is vindicated then they are overall. All dashed, desecrated people are transonic. Rough, dashed people are desecrated. Cindie is not dashed.", "logic": "\nColourful(loree)\nTransonic(loree)\nDesecrated(loree)\nDashed(loree)\nOverall(loree)\nTruculent(loree)\nColourful(cindie)\nTransonic(cindie)\nDesecrated(cindie)\nTruculent(cindie)\nVindicated(selle)\nDashed(selle)\nTruculent(selle)\nVindicated(colleen)\nOverall(colleen)\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) and Overall(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Vindicated(x))\nforall x (Vindicated(x) -> Overall(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) and Desecrated(x) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Overall(x) and Dashed(x) -> Desecrated(x))\n\nnot Dashed(cindie)\n\nTransonic(cindie) and forall x (Transonic(x) -> Dashed(x)) -> therefore Dashed(cindie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Jeniffer is thirtieth. Jeniffer is activating. Jeniffer is satellite. Jeniffer is distraught. Jeniffer is southmost. Jeniffer is icelandic. Larissa is thirtieth. Larissa is activating. Larissa is satellite. Larissa is icelandic. Tandi is unleavened. Tandi is distraught. Tandi is icelandic. Holley is unleavened. Holley is southmost. If someone is activating then they are distraught. All distraught, southmost people are icelandic. All activating people are unleavened. If someone is unleavened then they are southmost. All distraught, satellite people are activating. Rough, distraught people are satellite. Tandi is satellite.", "logic": "\nThirtieth(jeniffer)\nActivating(jeniffer)\nSatellite(jeniffer)\nDistraught(jeniffer)\nSouthmost(jeniffer)\nIcelandic(jeniffer)\nThirtieth(larissa)\nActivating(larissa)\nSatellite(larissa)\nIcelandic(larissa)\nUnleavened(tandi)\nDistraught(tandi)\nIcelandic(tandi)\nUnleavened(holley)\nSouthmost(holley)\nforall x (Activating(x) -> Distraught(x))\nforall x (Distraught(x) and Southmost(x) -> Icelandic(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) -> Unleavened(x))\nforall x (Unleavened(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Distraught(x) and Satellite(x) -> Activating(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) and Distraught(x) -> Satellite(x))\n\nSatellite(tandi)\n\nUnleavened(tandi) and forall x (Unleavened(x) -> Southmost(x)) -> therefore Southmost(tandi) Southmost(tandi) and Distraught(tandi) and forall x (Southmost(x) and Distraught(x) -> Satellite(x)) -> therefore Satellite(tandi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Gracia is deluxe. Gracia is unassured. Gracia is prongy. Gracia is ebullient. Gracia is calceolate. Gracia is stifled. Eryn is deluxe. Eryn is unassured. Eryn is prongy. Eryn is stifled. Tymothy is modish. Tymothy is ebullient. Tymothy is stifled. Martynne is modish. Martynne is calceolate. If someone is unassured then they are ebullient. All ebullient, calceolate people are stifled. All unassured people are modish. If someone is modish then they are calceolate. All ebullient, prongy people are unassured. Rough, ebullient people are prongy. Tymothy is not prongy.", "logic": "\nDeluxe(gracia)\nUnassured(gracia)\nProngy(gracia)\nEbullient(gracia)\nCalceolate(gracia)\nStifled(gracia)\nDeluxe(eryn)\nUnassured(eryn)\nProngy(eryn)\nStifled(eryn)\nModish(tymothy)\nEbullient(tymothy)\nStifled(tymothy)\nModish(martynne)\nCalceolate(martynne)\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Ebullient(x))\nforall x (Ebullient(x) and Calceolate(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) -> Modish(x))\nforall x (Modish(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Ebullient(x) and Prongy(x) -> Unassured(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) and Ebullient(x) -> Prongy(x))\n\nnot Prongy(tymothy)\n\nModish(tymothy) and forall x (Modish(x) -> Calceolate(x)) -> therefore Calceolate(tymothy) Calceolate(tymothy) and Ebullient(tymothy) and forall x (Calceolate(x) and Ebullient(x) -> Prongy(x)) -> therefore Prongy(tymothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Cassandry is eonian. Cassandry is stomatous. Cassandry is lively. Cassandry is cavernous. Cassandry is upwind. Cassandry is effusive. Stuart is eonian. Stuart is stomatous. Stuart is lively. Stuart is effusive. Rowena is labial. Rowena is cavernous. Rowena is effusive. Powell is labial. Powell is upwind. If someone is stomatous then they are cavernous. All cavernous, upwind people are effusive. All stomatous people are labial. If someone is labial then they are upwind. All cavernous, lively people are stomatous. Rough, cavernous people are lively. Rowena is stomatous.", "logic": "\nEonian(cassandry)\nStomatous(cassandry)\nLively(cassandry)\nCavernous(cassandry)\nUpwind(cassandry)\nEffusive(cassandry)\nEonian(stuart)\nStomatous(stuart)\nLively(stuart)\nEffusive(stuart)\nLabial(rowena)\nCavernous(rowena)\nEffusive(rowena)\nLabial(powell)\nUpwind(powell)\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> Cavernous(x))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) and Upwind(x) -> Effusive(x))\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> Labial(x))\nforall x (Labial(x) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Cavernous(x) and Lively(x) -> Stomatous(x))\nforall x (Upwind(x) and Cavernous(x) -> Lively(x))\n\nStomatous(rowena)\n\nLabial(rowena) and forall x (Labial(x) -> Upwind(x)) -> therefore Upwind(rowena) Upwind(rowena) and Cavernous(rowena) and forall x (Upwind(x) and Cavernous(x) -> Lively(x)) -> therefore Lively(rowena) Cavernous(rowena) and Lively(rowena) and forall x (Cavernous(x) and Lively(x) -> Stomatous(x)) -> therefore Stomatous(rowena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Fulton is provable. Fulton is billion. Fulton is czaristic. Fulton is crisp. Fulton is celestial. Fulton is condign. Xylina is provable. Xylina is billion. Xylina is czaristic. Xylina is condign. Vilma is doable. Vilma is crisp. Vilma is condign. Carleen is doable. Carleen is celestial. If someone is billion then they are crisp. All crisp, celestial people are condign. All billion people are doable. If someone is doable then they are celestial. All crisp, czaristic people are billion. Rough, crisp people are czaristic. Vilma is not billion.", "logic": "\nProvable(fulton)\nBillion(fulton)\nCzaristic(fulton)\nCrisp(fulton)\nCelestial(fulton)\nCondign(fulton)\nProvable(xylina)\nBillion(xylina)\nCzaristic(xylina)\nCondign(xylina)\nDoable(vilma)\nCrisp(vilma)\nCondign(vilma)\nDoable(carleen)\nCelestial(carleen)\nforall x (Billion(x) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) and Celestial(x) -> Condign(x))\nforall x (Billion(x) -> Doable(x))\nforall x (Doable(x) -> Celestial(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) and Czaristic(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Celestial(x) and Crisp(x) -> Czaristic(x))\n\nnot Billion(vilma)\n\nDoable(vilma) and forall x (Doable(x) -> Celestial(x)) -> therefore Celestial(vilma) Celestial(vilma) and Crisp(vilma) and forall x (Celestial(x) and Crisp(x) -> Czaristic(x)) -> therefore Czaristic(vilma) Crisp(vilma) and Czaristic(vilma) and forall x (Crisp(x) and Czaristic(x) -> Billion(x)) -> therefore Billion(vilma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Roseanne is whiskered. Roseanne is womanly. Roseanne is skyward. Roseanne is acetonic. Roseanne is brachiopod. Roseanne is cesarean. Vannie is whiskered. Vannie is womanly. Vannie is skyward. Vannie is cesarean. Arvy is systolic. Arvy is acetonic. Arvy is cesarean. Gardner is systolic. Gardner is brachiopod. If someone is womanly then they are acetonic. All acetonic, brachiopod people are cesarean. All womanly people are systolic. If someone is systolic then they are brachiopod. All acetonic, skyward people are womanly. Rough, acetonic people are skyward. Gardner is not acetonic.", "logic": "\nWhiskered(roseanne)\nWomanly(roseanne)\nSkyward(roseanne)\nAcetonic(roseanne)\nBrachiopod(roseanne)\nCesarean(roseanne)\nWhiskered(vannie)\nWomanly(vannie)\nSkyward(vannie)\nCesarean(vannie)\nSystolic(arvy)\nAcetonic(arvy)\nCesarean(arvy)\nSystolic(gardner)\nBrachiopod(gardner)\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Acetonic(x))\nforall x (Acetonic(x) and Brachiopod(x) -> Cesarean(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Systolic(x))\nforall x (Systolic(x) -> Brachiopod(x))\nforall x (Acetonic(x) and Skyward(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) and Acetonic(x) -> Skyward(x))\n\nnot Acetonic(gardner)\n\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Acetonic(x)) <- forall x (Acetonic(x) and Skyward(x) -> Womanly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Mitra is gristly. Mitra is underclass. Mitra is medieval. Mitra is refractive. Mitra is seaborne. Mitra is convolute. Gill is gristly. Gill is underclass. Gill is medieval. Gill is convolute. Kristian is squeaking. Kristian is refractive. Kristian is convolute. Whittaker is squeaking. Whittaker is seaborne. If someone is underclass then they are refractive. All refractive, seaborne people are convolute. All underclass people are squeaking. If someone is squeaking then they are seaborne. All refractive, medieval people are underclass. Rough, refractive people are medieval. Whittaker is underclass.", "logic": "\nGristly(mitra)\nUnderclass(mitra)\nMedieval(mitra)\nRefractive(mitra)\nSeaborne(mitra)\nConvolute(mitra)\nGristly(gill)\nUnderclass(gill)\nMedieval(gill)\nConvolute(gill)\nSqueaking(kristian)\nRefractive(kristian)\nConvolute(kristian)\nSqueaking(whittaker)\nSeaborne(whittaker)\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Refractive(x))\nforall x (Refractive(x) and Seaborne(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Squeaking(x) -> Seaborne(x))\nforall x (Refractive(x) and Medieval(x) -> Underclass(x))\nforall x (Seaborne(x) and Refractive(x) -> Medieval(x))\n\nUnderclass(whittaker)\n\nforall x (Refractive(x) and Medieval(x) -> Underclass(x)) <- forall x (Underclass(x) -> Refractive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Adelice is female. Adelice is pinioned. Adelice is extreme. Adelice is mythic. Adelice is attenuate. Adelice is undone. Celisse is female. Celisse is pinioned. Celisse is extreme. Celisse is undone. Bradley is fecal. Bradley is mythic. Bradley is undone. Donna is fecal. Donna is attenuate. If someone is pinioned then they are mythic. All mythic, attenuate people are undone. All pinioned people are fecal. If someone is fecal then they are attenuate. All mythic, extreme people are pinioned. Rough, mythic people are extreme. Donna is not undone.", "logic": "\nFemale(adelice)\nPinioned(adelice)\nExtreme(adelice)\nMythic(adelice)\nAttenuate(adelice)\nUndone(adelice)\nFemale(celisse)\nPinioned(celisse)\nExtreme(celisse)\nUndone(celisse)\nFecal(bradley)\nMythic(bradley)\nUndone(bradley)\nFecal(donna)\nAttenuate(donna)\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Attenuate(x) -> Undone(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Fecal(x))\nforall x (Fecal(x) -> Attenuate(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Extreme(x) -> Pinioned(x))\nforall x (Attenuate(x) and Mythic(x) -> Extreme(x))\n\nnot Undone(donna)\n\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Attenuate(x) -> Undone(x)) <- forall x (Pinioned(x) -> Mythic(x)) <- forall x (Mythic(x) and Extreme(x) -> Pinioned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Hervey is mendacious. Hervey is aeonian. Hervey is ideational. Hervey is theatrical. Hervey is migrant. Hervey is metal. Jerrine is mendacious. Jerrine is aeonian. Jerrine is ideational. Jerrine is metal. Nike is dinky. Nike is theatrical. Nike is metal. Leonora is dinky. Leonora is migrant. If someone is aeonian then they are theatrical. All theatrical, migrant people are metal. All aeonian people are dinky. If someone is dinky then they are migrant. All theatrical, ideational people are aeonian. Rough, theatrical people are ideational. Leonora is ideational.", "logic": "\nMendacious(hervey)\nAeonian(hervey)\nIdeational(hervey)\nTheatrical(hervey)\nMigrant(hervey)\nMetal(hervey)\nMendacious(jerrine)\nAeonian(jerrine)\nIdeational(jerrine)\nMetal(jerrine)\nDinky(nike)\nTheatrical(nike)\nMetal(nike)\nDinky(leonora)\nMigrant(leonora)\nforall x (Aeonian(x) -> Theatrical(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) and Migrant(x) -> Metal(x))\nforall x (Aeonian(x) -> Dinky(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Migrant(x))\nforall x (Theatrical(x) and Ideational(x) -> Aeonian(x))\nforall x (Migrant(x) and Theatrical(x) -> Ideational(x))\n\nIdeational(leonora)\n\nforall x (Migrant(x) and Theatrical(x) -> Ideational(x)) <- forall x (Aeonian(x) -> Theatrical(x)) <- forall x (Theatrical(x) and Ideational(x) -> Aeonian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Christan is fervent. Christan is urgent. Christan is napping. Christan is calloused. Christan is concurring. Christan is xlvi. Blare is fervent. Blare is urgent. Blare is napping. Blare is xlvi. Emily is spiderly. Emily is calloused. Emily is xlvi. Dabney is spiderly. Dabney is concurring. If someone is urgent then they are calloused. All calloused, concurring people are xlvi. All urgent people are spiderly. If someone is spiderly then they are concurring. All calloused, napping people are urgent. Rough, calloused people are napping. Dabney is not fervent.", "logic": "\nFervent(christan)\nUrgent(christan)\nNapping(christan)\nCalloused(christan)\nConcurring(christan)\nXlvi(christan)\nFervent(blare)\nUrgent(blare)\nNapping(blare)\nXlvi(blare)\nSpiderly(emily)\nCalloused(emily)\nXlvi(emily)\nSpiderly(dabney)\nConcurring(dabney)\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Calloused(x))\nforall x (Calloused(x) and Concurring(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Spiderly(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Concurring(x))\nforall x (Calloused(x) and Napping(x) -> Urgent(x))\nforall x (Concurring(x) and Calloused(x) -> Napping(x))\n\nnot Fervent(dabney)\n\nnot Fervent(dabney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "Raine is budding. Raine is necklike. Raine is undefeated. Raine is unethical. Raine is unpassable. Raine is cubist. Dolora is budding. Dolora is necklike. Dolora is undefeated. Dolora is cubist. Meaghan is prox. Meaghan is unethical. Meaghan is cubist. Katerine is prox. Katerine is unpassable. If someone is necklike then they are unethical. All unethical, unpassable people are cubist. All necklike people are prox. If someone is prox then they are unpassable. All unethical, undefeated people are necklike. Rough, unethical people are undefeated. Meaghan is budding.", "logic": "\nBudding(raine)\nNecklike(raine)\nUndefeated(raine)\nUnethical(raine)\nUnpassable(raine)\nCubist(raine)\nBudding(dolora)\nNecklike(dolora)\nUndefeated(dolora)\nCubist(dolora)\nProx(meaghan)\nUnethical(meaghan)\nCubist(meaghan)\nProx(katerine)\nUnpassable(katerine)\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Unethical(x) and Unpassable(x) -> Cubist(x))\nforall x (Necklike(x) -> Prox(x))\nforall x (Prox(x) -> Unpassable(x))\nforall x (Unethical(x) and Undefeated(x) -> Necklike(x))\nforall x (Unpassable(x) and Unethical(x) -> Undefeated(x))\n\nBudding(meaghan)\n\nBudding(meaghan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1102"} {"premises": "The bart minstrel the angela. The leia is apteral. The rycca is matted. The angela is matted. If someone uphold the bart then the bart is matted. If someone minstrel the leia and they are genotypic then they need the angela. If someone is uncousinly and genotypic then they need the leia. If the angela flour the rycca then the angela is apteral. If someone minstrel the leia and they chase the rycca then they are apteral. If someone is matted then they see the bart. The bart minstrel the angela.", "logic": "\nMinstrel(bart, angela)\nApteral(leia)\nMatted(rycca)\nMatted(angela)\nforall x (Uphold(x, bart) -> Matted(bart))\nforall x (Minstrel(x, leia) and Genotypic(x) -> Flour(x, angela))\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) and Genotypic(x) -> Flour(x, leia))\nFlour(angela, rycca) -> Apteral(angela)\nforall x (Minstrel(x, leia) and Minstrel(x, rycca) -> Apteral(x))\nforall x (Matted(x) -> Uphold(x, bart))\n\nMinstrel(bart, angela)\n\ntherefore Minstrel(bart, angela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The cherlyn unfasten the anabella. The lynn is portable. The hubert is condign. The anabella is condign. If someone tumesce the cherlyn then the cherlyn is condign. If someone unfasten the lynn and they are feculent then they need the anabella. If someone is thyroid and feculent then they need the lynn. If the anabella canvas the hubert then the anabella is portable. If someone unfasten the lynn and they chase the hubert then they are portable. If someone is condign then they see the cherlyn. The anabella is not condign.", "logic": "\nUnfasten(cherlyn, anabella)\nPortable(lynn)\nCondign(hubert)\nCondign(anabella)\nforall x (Tumesce(x, cherlyn) -> Condign(cherlyn))\nforall x (Unfasten(x, lynn) and Feculent(x) -> Canvas(x, anabella))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) and Feculent(x) -> Canvas(x, lynn))\nCanvas(anabella, hubert) -> Portable(anabella)\nforall x (Unfasten(x, lynn) and Unfasten(x, hubert) -> Portable(x))\nforall x (Condign(x) -> Tumesce(x, cherlyn))\n\nnot Condign(anabella)\n\ntherefore Condign(anabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The catlaina shift the aggi. The reggis is xxxiii. The sande is bated. The aggi is bated. If someone caption the catlaina then the catlaina is bated. If someone shift the reggis and they are unowned then they need the aggi. If someone is autarkic and unowned then they need the reggis. If the aggi backpack the sande then the aggi is xxxiii. If someone shift the reggis and they chase the sande then they are xxxiii. If someone is bated then they see the catlaina. The aggi caption the catlaina.", "logic": "\nShift(catlaina, aggi)\nXxxiii(reggis)\nBated(sande)\nBated(aggi)\nforall x (Caption(x, catlaina) -> Bated(catlaina))\nforall x (Shift(x, reggis) and Unowned(x) -> Backpack(x, aggi))\nforall x (Autarkic(x) and Unowned(x) -> Backpack(x, reggis))\nBackpack(aggi, sande) -> Xxxiii(aggi)\nforall x (Shift(x, reggis) and Shift(x, sande) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Caption(x, catlaina))\n\nCaption(aggi, catlaina)\n\nBated(aggi) and forall x (Bated(x) -> Caption(x, catlaina)) -> therefore Caption(aggi, catlaina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The fern fecundate the starlin. The rube is barred. The barb is agone. The starlin is agone. If someone fudge the fern then the fern is agone. If someone fecundate the rube and they are fitted then they need the starlin. If someone is barbed and fitted then they need the rube. If the starlin deter the barb then the starlin is barred. If someone fecundate the rube and they chase the barb then they are barred. If someone is agone then they see the fern. The starlin does not see the fern.", "logic": "\nFecundate(fern, starlin)\nBarred(rube)\nAgone(barb)\nAgone(starlin)\nforall x (Fudge(x, fern) -> Agone(fern))\nforall x (Fecundate(x, rube) and Fitted(x) -> Deter(x, starlin))\nforall x (Barbed(x) and Fitted(x) -> Deter(x, rube))\nDeter(starlin, barb) -> Barred(starlin)\nforall x (Fecundate(x, rube) and Fecundate(x, barb) -> Barred(x))\nforall x (Agone(x) -> Fudge(x, fern))\n\nnot Fudge(starlin, fern)\n\nAgone(starlin) and forall x (Agone(x) -> Fudge(x, fern)) -> therefore Fudge(starlin, fern)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The caritta disapprove the pepito. The devon is chambered. The quigly is plushy. The pepito is plushy. If someone ruffle the caritta then the caritta is plushy. If someone disapprove the devon and they are frolicky then they need the pepito. If someone is hopeful and frolicky then they need the devon. If the pepito relish the quigly then the pepito is chambered. If someone disapprove the devon and they chase the quigly then they are chambered. If someone is plushy then they see the caritta. The caritta is plushy.", "logic": "\nDisapprove(caritta, pepito)\nChambered(devon)\nPlushy(quigly)\nPlushy(pepito)\nforall x (Ruffle(x, caritta) -> Plushy(caritta))\nforall x (Disapprove(x, devon) and Frolicky(x) -> Relish(x, pepito))\nforall x (Hopeful(x) and Frolicky(x) -> Relish(x, devon))\nRelish(pepito, quigly) -> Chambered(pepito)\nforall x (Disapprove(x, devon) and Disapprove(x, quigly) -> Chambered(x))\nforall x (Plushy(x) -> Ruffle(x, caritta))\n\nPlushy(caritta)\n\nPlushy(quigly) and forall x (Plushy(x) -> Ruffle(x, caritta)) -> therefore Ruffle(quigly, caritta) Ruffle(quigly, caritta) and forall x (Ruffle(x, caritta) -> Plushy(caritta)) -> therefore Plushy(caritta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The hirsch rebuff the milt. The ludwig is sultry. The fabian is cadent. The milt is cadent. If someone orient the hirsch then the hirsch is cadent. If someone rebuff the ludwig and they are forfeit then they need the milt. If someone is unbloody and forfeit then they need the ludwig. If the milt constrain the fabian then the milt is sultry. If someone rebuff the ludwig and they chase the fabian then they are sultry. If someone is cadent then they see the hirsch. The hirsch is not cadent.", "logic": "\nRebuff(hirsch, milt)\nSultry(ludwig)\nCadent(fabian)\nCadent(milt)\nforall x (Orient(x, hirsch) -> Cadent(hirsch))\nforall x (Rebuff(x, ludwig) and Forfeit(x) -> Constrain(x, milt))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Forfeit(x) -> Constrain(x, ludwig))\nConstrain(milt, fabian) -> Sultry(milt)\nforall x (Rebuff(x, ludwig) and Rebuff(x, fabian) -> Sultry(x))\nforall x (Cadent(x) -> Orient(x, hirsch))\n\nnot Cadent(hirsch)\n\nCadent(fabian) and forall x (Cadent(x) -> Orient(x, hirsch)) -> therefore Orient(fabian, hirsch) Orient(fabian, hirsch) and forall x (Orient(x, hirsch) -> Cadent(hirsch)) -> therefore Cadent(hirsch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The joyann liquidise the timmie. The susette is spousal. The nickolas is mutagenic. The timmie is mutagenic. If someone libel the joyann then the joyann is mutagenic. If someone liquidise the susette and they are shrewd then they need the timmie. If someone is hooflike and shrewd then they need the susette. If the timmie dismiss the nickolas then the timmie is spousal. If someone liquidise the susette and they chase the nickolas then they are spousal. If someone is mutagenic then they see the joyann. The joyann libel the joyann.", "logic": "\nLiquidise(joyann, timmie)\nSpousal(susette)\nMutagenic(nickolas)\nMutagenic(timmie)\nforall x (Libel(x, joyann) -> Mutagenic(joyann))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, susette) and Shrewd(x) -> Dismiss(x, timmie))\nforall x (Hooflike(x) and Shrewd(x) -> Dismiss(x, susette))\nDismiss(timmie, nickolas) -> Spousal(timmie)\nforall x (Liquidise(x, susette) and Liquidise(x, nickolas) -> Spousal(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Libel(x, joyann))\n\nLibel(joyann, joyann)\n\nMutagenic(nickolas) and forall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Libel(x, joyann)) -> therefore Libel(nickolas, joyann) Libel(nickolas, joyann) and forall x (Libel(x, joyann) -> Mutagenic(joyann)) -> therefore Mutagenic(joyann) Mutagenic(joyann) and forall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Libel(x, joyann)) -> therefore Libel(joyann, joyann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The abe airlift the piotr. The florenza is statute. The romola is trigonal. The piotr is trigonal. If someone depend the abe then the abe is trigonal. If someone airlift the florenza and they are tireless then they need the piotr. If someone is chic and tireless then they need the florenza. If the piotr brecciate the romola then the piotr is statute. If someone airlift the florenza and they chase the romola then they are statute. If someone is trigonal then they see the abe. The abe does not see the abe.", "logic": "\nAirlift(abe, piotr)\nStatute(florenza)\nTrigonal(romola)\nTrigonal(piotr)\nforall x (Depend(x, abe) -> Trigonal(abe))\nforall x (Airlift(x, florenza) and Tireless(x) -> Brecciate(x, piotr))\nforall x (Chic(x) and Tireless(x) -> Brecciate(x, florenza))\nBrecciate(piotr, romola) -> Statute(piotr)\nforall x (Airlift(x, florenza) and Airlift(x, romola) -> Statute(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> Depend(x, abe))\n\nnot Depend(abe, abe)\n\nTrigonal(romola) and forall x (Trigonal(x) -> Depend(x, abe)) -> therefore Depend(romola, abe) Depend(romola, abe) and forall x (Depend(x, abe) -> Trigonal(abe)) -> therefore Trigonal(abe) Trigonal(abe) and forall x (Trigonal(x) -> Depend(x, abe)) -> therefore Depend(abe, abe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The ruthi designate the patti. The latrena is revolved. The layla is springy. The patti is springy. If someone interlock the ruthi then the ruthi is springy. If someone designate the latrena and they are agonized then they need the patti. If someone is gyral and agonized then they need the latrena. If the patti clutter the layla then the patti is revolved. If someone designate the latrena and they chase the layla then they are revolved. If someone is springy then they see the ruthi. The latrena does not need the patti.", "logic": "\nDesignate(ruthi, patti)\nRevolved(latrena)\nSpringy(layla)\nSpringy(patti)\nforall x (Interlock(x, ruthi) -> Springy(ruthi))\nforall x (Designate(x, latrena) and Agonized(x) -> Clutter(x, patti))\nforall x (Gyral(x) and Agonized(x) -> Clutter(x, latrena))\nClutter(patti, layla) -> Revolved(patti)\nforall x (Designate(x, latrena) and Designate(x, layla) -> Revolved(x))\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Interlock(x, ruthi))\n\nnot Clutter(latrena, patti)\n\nforall x (Designate(x, latrena) and Agonized(x) -> Clutter(x, patti)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The kimmy ritualise the charley. The julietta is silvan. The chandra is crafty. The charley is crafty. If someone pollute the kimmy then the kimmy is crafty. If someone ritualise the julietta and they are cultural then they need the charley. If someone is allargando and cultural then they need the julietta. If the charley pervert the chandra then the charley is silvan. If someone ritualise the julietta and they chase the chandra then they are silvan. If someone is crafty then they see the kimmy. The julietta pollute the kimmy.", "logic": "\nRitualise(kimmy, charley)\nSilvan(julietta)\nCrafty(chandra)\nCrafty(charley)\nforall x (Pollute(x, kimmy) -> Crafty(kimmy))\nforall x (Ritualise(x, julietta) and Cultural(x) -> Pervert(x, charley))\nforall x (Allargando(x) and Cultural(x) -> Pervert(x, julietta))\nPervert(charley, chandra) -> Silvan(charley)\nforall x (Ritualise(x, julietta) and Ritualise(x, chandra) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> Pollute(x, kimmy))\n\nPollute(julietta, kimmy)\n\nforall x (Crafty(x) -> Pollute(x, kimmy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The teriann splurge the flossi. The lorry is emasculate. The kaitlyn is honorable. The flossi is honorable. If someone realine the teriann then the teriann is honorable. If someone splurge the lorry and they are specious then they need the flossi. If someone is unmade and specious then they need the lorry. If the flossi interbreed the kaitlyn then the flossi is emasculate. If someone splurge the lorry and they chase the kaitlyn then they are emasculate. If someone is honorable then they see the teriann. The kaitlyn does not need the flossi.", "logic": "\nSplurge(teriann, flossi)\nEmasculate(lorry)\nHonorable(kaitlyn)\nHonorable(flossi)\nforall x (Realine(x, teriann) -> Honorable(teriann))\nforall x (Splurge(x, lorry) and Specious(x) -> Interbreed(x, flossi))\nforall x (Unmade(x) and Specious(x) -> Interbreed(x, lorry))\nInterbreed(flossi, kaitlyn) -> Emasculate(flossi)\nforall x (Splurge(x, lorry) and Splurge(x, kaitlyn) -> Emasculate(x))\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Realine(x, teriann))\n\nnot Interbreed(kaitlyn, flossi)\n\nforall x (Splurge(x, lorry) and Specious(x) -> Interbreed(x, flossi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The armstrong work the malissia. The clinten is confusing. The blanca is petrous. The malissia is petrous. If someone loiter the armstrong then the armstrong is petrous. If someone work the clinten and they are pulverized then they need the malissia. If someone is reflexed and pulverized then they need the clinten. If the malissia ripen the blanca then the malissia is confusing. If someone work the clinten and they chase the blanca then they are confusing. If someone is petrous then they see the armstrong. The armstrong is confusing.", "logic": "\nWork(armstrong, malissia)\nConfusing(clinten)\nPetrous(blanca)\nPetrous(malissia)\nforall x (Loiter(x, armstrong) -> Petrous(armstrong))\nforall x (Work(x, clinten) and Pulverized(x) -> Ripen(x, malissia))\nforall x (Reflexed(x) and Pulverized(x) -> Ripen(x, clinten))\nRipen(malissia, blanca) -> Confusing(malissia)\nforall x (Work(x, clinten) and Work(x, blanca) -> Confusing(x))\nforall x (Petrous(x) -> Loiter(x, armstrong))\n\nConfusing(armstrong)\n\nforall x (Work(x, clinten) and Work(x, blanca) -> Confusing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The walter alibi the wendell. The viole is imminent. The lina is unsaved. The wendell is unsaved. If someone unpack the walter then the walter is unsaved. If someone alibi the viole and they are audenesque then they need the wendell. If someone is tripartite and audenesque then they need the viole. If the wendell giggle the lina then the wendell is imminent. If someone alibi the viole and they chase the lina then they are imminent. If someone is unsaved then they see the walter. The wendell does not chase the viole.", "logic": "\nAlibi(walter, wendell)\nImminent(viole)\nUnsaved(lina)\nUnsaved(wendell)\nforall x (Unpack(x, walter) -> Unsaved(walter))\nforall x (Alibi(x, viole) and Audenesque(x) -> Giggle(x, wendell))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and Audenesque(x) -> Giggle(x, viole))\nGiggle(wendell, lina) -> Imminent(wendell)\nforall x (Alibi(x, viole) and Alibi(x, lina) -> Imminent(x))\nforall x (Unsaved(x) -> Unpack(x, walter))\n\nnot Alibi(wendell, viole)\n\nnot Alibi(wendell, viole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The isabella enthrone the barnebas. The garv is pudendal. The lurleen is jerky. The barnebas is jerky. If someone conform the isabella then the isabella is jerky. If someone enthrone the garv and they are bismuthic then they need the barnebas. If someone is unstinting and bismuthic then they need the garv. If the barnebas beguile the lurleen then the barnebas is pudendal. If someone enthrone the garv and they chase the lurleen then they are pudendal. If someone is jerky then they see the isabella. The lurleen enthrone the barnebas.", "logic": "\nEnthrone(isabella, barnebas)\nPudendal(garv)\nJerky(lurleen)\nJerky(barnebas)\nforall x (Conform(x, isabella) -> Jerky(isabella))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, garv) and Bismuthic(x) -> Beguile(x, barnebas))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) and Bismuthic(x) -> Beguile(x, garv))\nBeguile(barnebas, lurleen) -> Pudendal(barnebas)\nforall x (Enthrone(x, garv) and Enthrone(x, lurleen) -> Pudendal(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) -> Conform(x, isabella))\n\nEnthrone(lurleen, barnebas)\n\nEnthrone(lurleen, barnebas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The clayborn queer the mae. The clarke is generous. The angelita is upscale. The mae is upscale. If someone slice the clayborn then the clayborn is upscale. If someone queer the clarke and they are gifted then they need the mae. If someone is raiding and gifted then they need the clarke. If the mae auscultate the angelita then the mae is generous. If someone queer the clarke and they chase the angelita then they are generous. If someone is upscale then they see the clayborn. The clarke is not upscale.", "logic": "\nQueer(clayborn, mae)\nGenerous(clarke)\nUpscale(angelita)\nUpscale(mae)\nforall x (Slice(x, clayborn) -> Upscale(clayborn))\nforall x (Queer(x, clarke) and Gifted(x) -> Auscultate(x, mae))\nforall x (Raiding(x) and Gifted(x) -> Auscultate(x, clarke))\nAuscultate(mae, angelita) -> Generous(mae)\nforall x (Queer(x, clarke) and Queer(x, angelita) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Slice(x, clayborn))\n\nnot Upscale(clarke)\n\nnot Upscale(clarke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The shannon polychrome the sanson. The beaufort is caruncular. The stefania is accusing. The sanson is accusing. If someone gluttonize the shannon then the shannon is accusing. If someone polychrome the beaufort and they are dissenting then they need the sanson. If someone is gastric and dissenting then they need the beaufort. If the sanson draft the stefania then the sanson is caruncular. If someone polychrome the beaufort and they chase the stefania then they are caruncular. If someone is accusing then they see the shannon. The shannon gluttonize the sanson.", "logic": "\nPolychrome(shannon, sanson)\nCaruncular(beaufort)\nAccusing(stefania)\nAccusing(sanson)\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, shannon) -> Accusing(shannon))\nforall x (Polychrome(x, beaufort) and Dissenting(x) -> Draft(x, sanson))\nforall x (Gastric(x) and Dissenting(x) -> Draft(x, beaufort))\nDraft(sanson, stefania) -> Caruncular(sanson)\nforall x (Polychrome(x, beaufort) and Polychrome(x, stefania) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Accusing(x) -> Gluttonize(x, shannon))\n\nGluttonize(shannon, sanson)\n\nGluttonize(shannon, sanson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-231"} {"premises": "The murray deform the marci. The murray is porcine. The murray batter the tiler. The murray batter the marci. The murray signpost the tiler. The tiler is not porcine. The marci deform the murray. The marci is perforate. The marci does not like the tiler. The marci signpost the murray. If someone deform the marci then they chase the tiler. The marci is perforate.", "logic": "\nDeform(murray, marci)\nPorcine(murray)\nBatter(murray, tiler)\nBatter(murray, marci)\nSignpost(murray, tiler)\nnot Porcine(tiler)\nDeform(marci, murray)\nPerforate(marci)\nnot Batter(marci, tiler)\nSignpost(marci, murray)\nforall x (Deform(x, marci) -> Deform(x, tiler))\n\nPerforate(marci)\n\ntherefore Perforate(marci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The josephine overfill the shandee. The josephine is supportive. The josephine mingle the radcliffe. The josephine mingle the shandee. The josephine find the radcliffe. The radcliffe is not supportive. The shandee overfill the josephine. The shandee is catacorner. The shandee does not like the radcliffe. The shandee find the josephine. If someone overfill the shandee then they chase the radcliffe. The shandee does not see the josephine.", "logic": "\nOverfill(josephine, shandee)\nSupportive(josephine)\nMingle(josephine, radcliffe)\nMingle(josephine, shandee)\nFind(josephine, radcliffe)\nnot Supportive(radcliffe)\nOverfill(shandee, josephine)\nCatacorner(shandee)\nnot Mingle(shandee, radcliffe)\nFind(shandee, josephine)\nforall x (Overfill(x, shandee) -> Overfill(x, radcliffe))\n\nnot Find(shandee, josephine)\n\ntherefore Find(shandee, josephine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The kalle service the marsh. The kalle is awaited. The kalle saturate the nonie. The kalle saturate the marsh. The kalle gong the nonie. The nonie is not awaited. The marsh service the kalle. The marsh is soignee. The marsh does not like the nonie. The marsh gong the kalle. If someone service the marsh then they chase the nonie. The kalle service the nonie.", "logic": "\nService(kalle, marsh)\nAwaited(kalle)\nSaturate(kalle, nonie)\nSaturate(kalle, marsh)\nGong(kalle, nonie)\nnot Awaited(nonie)\nService(marsh, kalle)\nSoignee(marsh)\nnot Saturate(marsh, nonie)\nGong(marsh, kalle)\nforall x (Service(x, marsh) -> Service(x, nonie))\n\nService(kalle, nonie)\n\nService(kalle, marsh) and forall x (Service(x, marsh) -> Service(x, nonie)) -> therefore Service(kalle, nonie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The rebekkah demobilise the nicholle. The rebekkah is urgent. The rebekkah station the tomkin. The rebekkah station the nicholle. The rebekkah cinematize the tomkin. The tomkin is not urgent. The nicholle demobilise the rebekkah. The nicholle is trimotored. The nicholle does not like the tomkin. The nicholle cinematize the rebekkah. If someone demobilise the nicholle then they chase the tomkin. The rebekkah does not chase the tomkin.", "logic": "\nDemobilise(rebekkah, nicholle)\nUrgent(rebekkah)\nStation(rebekkah, tomkin)\nStation(rebekkah, nicholle)\nCinematize(rebekkah, tomkin)\nnot Urgent(tomkin)\nDemobilise(nicholle, rebekkah)\nTrimotored(nicholle)\nnot Station(nicholle, tomkin)\nCinematize(nicholle, rebekkah)\nforall x (Demobilise(x, nicholle) -> Demobilise(x, tomkin))\n\nnot Demobilise(rebekkah, tomkin)\n\nDemobilise(rebekkah, nicholle) and forall x (Demobilise(x, nicholle) -> Demobilise(x, tomkin)) -> therefore Demobilise(rebekkah, tomkin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The rufe whirlpool the roxy. The rufe is tireless. The rufe enlarge the bianka. The rufe enlarge the roxy. The rufe grouse the bianka. The bianka is not tireless. The roxy whirlpool the rufe. The roxy is atrophied. The roxy does not like the bianka. The roxy grouse the rufe. If someone whirlpool the roxy then they chase the bianka. The bianka does not chase the bianka.", "logic": "\nWhirlpool(rufe, roxy)\nTireless(rufe)\nEnlarge(rufe, bianka)\nEnlarge(rufe, roxy)\nGrouse(rufe, bianka)\nnot Tireless(bianka)\nWhirlpool(roxy, rufe)\nAtrophied(roxy)\nnot Enlarge(roxy, bianka)\nGrouse(roxy, rufe)\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, roxy) -> Whirlpool(x, bianka))\n\nnot Whirlpool(bianka, bianka)\n\nforall x (Whirlpool(x, roxy) -> Whirlpool(x, bianka)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The ulrick birdlime the lance. The ulrick is rascally. The ulrick jaunt the serene. The ulrick jaunt the lance. The ulrick backstroke the serene. The serene is not rascally. The lance birdlime the ulrick. The lance is statewide. The lance does not like the serene. The lance backstroke the ulrick. If someone birdlime the lance then they chase the serene. The lance birdlime the serene.", "logic": "\nBirdlime(ulrick, lance)\nRascally(ulrick)\nJaunt(ulrick, serene)\nJaunt(ulrick, lance)\nBackstroke(ulrick, serene)\nnot Rascally(serene)\nBirdlime(lance, ulrick)\nStatewide(lance)\nnot Jaunt(lance, serene)\nBackstroke(lance, ulrick)\nforall x (Birdlime(x, lance) -> Birdlime(x, serene))\n\nBirdlime(lance, serene)\n\nforall x (Birdlime(x, lance) -> Birdlime(x, serene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The willey abscond the cyrille. The willey is courtly. The willey aline the alissa. The willey aline the cyrille. The willey mellow the alissa. The alissa is not courtly. The cyrille abscond the willey. The cyrille is tidy. The cyrille does not like the alissa. The cyrille mellow the willey. If someone abscond the cyrille then they chase the alissa. The alissa does not chase the cyrille.", "logic": "\nAbscond(willey, cyrille)\nCourtly(willey)\nAline(willey, alissa)\nAline(willey, cyrille)\nMellow(willey, alissa)\nnot Courtly(alissa)\nAbscond(cyrille, willey)\nTidy(cyrille)\nnot Aline(cyrille, alissa)\nMellow(cyrille, willey)\nforall x (Abscond(x, cyrille) -> Abscond(x, alissa))\n\nnot Abscond(alissa, cyrille)\n\nnot Abscond(alissa, cyrille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The broddy linger the zacharias. The broddy is botanical. The broddy marbleise the allys. The broddy marbleise the zacharias. The broddy decimalise the allys. The allys is not botanical. The zacharias linger the broddy. The zacharias is monotypic. The zacharias does not like the allys. The zacharias decimalise the broddy. If someone linger the zacharias then they chase the allys. The allys marbleise the zacharias.", "logic": "\nLinger(broddy, zacharias)\nBotanical(broddy)\nMarbleise(broddy, allys)\nMarbleise(broddy, zacharias)\nDecimalise(broddy, allys)\nnot Botanical(allys)\nLinger(zacharias, broddy)\nMonotypic(zacharias)\nnot Marbleise(zacharias, allys)\nDecimalise(zacharias, broddy)\nforall x (Linger(x, zacharias) -> Linger(x, allys))\n\nMarbleise(allys, zacharias)\n\nMarbleise(allys, zacharias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-142"} {"premises": "The kimberlyn coat the luis. The kimberlyn is wearied. The kimberlyn is blubbery. The kimberlyn is ammonitic. The kimberlyn is worthless. The kimberlyn is eulogistic. The kimberlyn hack the luis. The kimberlyn budget the luis. The luis coat the kimberlyn. The luis is wearied. The luis is blubbery. The luis is ammonitic. The luis is eulogistic. The luis hack the kimberlyn. The luis budget the kimberlyn. If the luis budget the kimberlyn and the kimberlyn is worthless then the luis is ammonitic. Nice people are wearied. If someone coat the luis and they are ammonitic then the luis is wearied. If the luis coat the kimberlyn and the kimberlyn coat the luis then the luis budget the kimberlyn. If the kimberlyn coat the luis and the luis coat the kimberlyn then the kimberlyn hack the luis. If someone coat the luis and the luis budget the kimberlyn then the luis is worthless. If someone coat the luis then the luis is ammonitic. If the kimberlyn coat the luis and the luis coat the kimberlyn then the luis is eulogistic. The kimberlyn is wearied.", "logic": "\nCoat(kimberlyn, luis)\nWearied(kimberlyn)\nBlubbery(kimberlyn)\nAmmonitic(kimberlyn)\nWorthless(kimberlyn)\nEulogistic(kimberlyn)\nHack(kimberlyn, luis)\nBudget(kimberlyn, luis)\nCoat(luis, kimberlyn)\nWearied(luis)\nBlubbery(luis)\nAmmonitic(luis)\nEulogistic(luis)\nHack(luis, kimberlyn)\nBudget(luis, kimberlyn)\nBudget(luis, kimberlyn) and Worthless(kimberlyn) -> Ammonitic(luis)\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> Wearied(x))\nforall x (Coat(x, luis) and Ammonitic(x) -> Wearied(luis))\nCoat(luis, kimberlyn) and Coat(kimberlyn, luis) -> Budget(luis, kimberlyn)\nCoat(kimberlyn, luis) and Coat(luis, kimberlyn) -> Hack(kimberlyn, luis)\nforall x (Coat(x, luis) and Budget(luis, kimberlyn) -> Worthless(luis))\nforall x (Coat(x, luis) -> Ammonitic(luis))\nCoat(kimberlyn, luis) and Coat(luis, kimberlyn) -> Eulogistic(luis)\n\nWearied(kimberlyn)\n\ntherefore Wearied(kimberlyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The cybal redefine the sophey. The cybal is tolerant. The cybal is squabby. The cybal is uricosuric. The cybal is aerial. The cybal is graded. The cybal subjugate the sophey. The cybal husband the sophey. The sophey redefine the cybal. The sophey is tolerant. The sophey is squabby. The sophey is uricosuric. The sophey is graded. The sophey subjugate the cybal. The sophey husband the cybal. If the sophey husband the cybal and the cybal is aerial then the sophey is uricosuric. Nice people are tolerant. If someone redefine the sophey and they are uricosuric then the sophey is tolerant. If the sophey redefine the cybal and the cybal redefine the sophey then the sophey husband the cybal. If the cybal redefine the sophey and the sophey redefine the cybal then the cybal subjugate the sophey. If someone redefine the sophey and the sophey husband the cybal then the sophey is aerial. If someone redefine the sophey then the sophey is uricosuric. If the cybal redefine the sophey and the sophey redefine the cybal then the sophey is graded. The sophey does not visit the cybal.", "logic": "\nRedefine(cybal, sophey)\nTolerant(cybal)\nSquabby(cybal)\nUricosuric(cybal)\nAerial(cybal)\nGraded(cybal)\nSubjugate(cybal, sophey)\nHusband(cybal, sophey)\nRedefine(sophey, cybal)\nTolerant(sophey)\nSquabby(sophey)\nUricosuric(sophey)\nGraded(sophey)\nSubjugate(sophey, cybal)\nHusband(sophey, cybal)\nHusband(sophey, cybal) and Aerial(cybal) -> Uricosuric(sophey)\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Redefine(x, sophey) and Uricosuric(x) -> Tolerant(sophey))\nRedefine(sophey, cybal) and Redefine(cybal, sophey) -> Husband(sophey, cybal)\nRedefine(cybal, sophey) and Redefine(sophey, cybal) -> Subjugate(cybal, sophey)\nforall x (Redefine(x, sophey) and Husband(sophey, cybal) -> Aerial(sophey))\nforall x (Redefine(x, sophey) -> Uricosuric(sophey))\nRedefine(cybal, sophey) and Redefine(sophey, cybal) -> Graded(sophey)\n\nnot Husband(sophey, cybal)\n\ntherefore Husband(sophey, cybal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The hank alkalinise the evonne. The hank is peripteral. The hank is carroty. The hank is jingoistic. The hank is fineable. The hank is united. The hank avianize the evonne. The hank ignite the evonne. The evonne alkalinise the hank. The evonne is peripteral. The evonne is carroty. The evonne is jingoistic. The evonne is united. The evonne avianize the hank. The evonne ignite the hank. If the evonne ignite the hank and the hank is fineable then the evonne is jingoistic. Nice people are peripteral. If someone alkalinise the evonne and they are jingoistic then the evonne is peripteral. If the evonne alkalinise the hank and the hank alkalinise the evonne then the evonne ignite the hank. If the hank alkalinise the evonne and the evonne alkalinise the hank then the hank avianize the evonne. If someone alkalinise the evonne and the evonne ignite the hank then the evonne is fineable. If someone alkalinise the evonne then the evonne is jingoistic. If the hank alkalinise the evonne and the evonne alkalinise the hank then the evonne is united. The evonne is fineable.", "logic": "\nAlkalinise(hank, evonne)\nPeripteral(hank)\nCarroty(hank)\nJingoistic(hank)\nFineable(hank)\nUnited(hank)\nAvianize(hank, evonne)\nIgnite(hank, evonne)\nAlkalinise(evonne, hank)\nPeripteral(evonne)\nCarroty(evonne)\nJingoistic(evonne)\nUnited(evonne)\nAvianize(evonne, hank)\nIgnite(evonne, hank)\nIgnite(evonne, hank) and Fineable(hank) -> Jingoistic(evonne)\nforall x (Jingoistic(x) -> Peripteral(x))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, evonne) and Jingoistic(x) -> Peripteral(evonne))\nAlkalinise(evonne, hank) and Alkalinise(hank, evonne) -> Ignite(evonne, hank)\nAlkalinise(hank, evonne) and Alkalinise(evonne, hank) -> Avianize(hank, evonne)\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, evonne) and Ignite(evonne, hank) -> Fineable(evonne))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, evonne) -> Jingoistic(evonne))\nAlkalinise(hank, evonne) and Alkalinise(evonne, hank) -> United(evonne)\n\nFineable(evonne)\n\nAlkalinise(hank, evonne) and Ignite(evonne, hank) and forall x (Alkalinise(x, evonne) and Ignite(evonne, hank) -> Fineable(evonne)) -> therefore Fineable(evonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The alvinia shoplift the florian. The alvinia is flavourful. The alvinia is silly. The alvinia is afloat. The alvinia is knavish. The alvinia is partisan. The alvinia reave the florian. The alvinia notarize the florian. The florian shoplift the alvinia. The florian is flavourful. The florian is silly. The florian is afloat. The florian is partisan. The florian reave the alvinia. The florian notarize the alvinia. If the florian notarize the alvinia and the alvinia is knavish then the florian is afloat. Nice people are flavourful. If someone shoplift the florian and they are afloat then the florian is flavourful. If the florian shoplift the alvinia and the alvinia shoplift the florian then the florian notarize the alvinia. If the alvinia shoplift the florian and the florian shoplift the alvinia then the alvinia reave the florian. If someone shoplift the florian and the florian notarize the alvinia then the florian is knavish. If someone shoplift the florian then the florian is afloat. If the alvinia shoplift the florian and the florian shoplift the alvinia then the florian is partisan. The florian is not knavish.", "logic": "\nShoplift(alvinia, florian)\nFlavourful(alvinia)\nSilly(alvinia)\nAfloat(alvinia)\nKnavish(alvinia)\nPartisan(alvinia)\nReave(alvinia, florian)\nNotarize(alvinia, florian)\nShoplift(florian, alvinia)\nFlavourful(florian)\nSilly(florian)\nAfloat(florian)\nPartisan(florian)\nReave(florian, alvinia)\nNotarize(florian, alvinia)\nNotarize(florian, alvinia) and Knavish(alvinia) -> Afloat(florian)\nforall x (Afloat(x) -> Flavourful(x))\nforall x (Shoplift(x, florian) and Afloat(x) -> Flavourful(florian))\nShoplift(florian, alvinia) and Shoplift(alvinia, florian) -> Notarize(florian, alvinia)\nShoplift(alvinia, florian) and Shoplift(florian, alvinia) -> Reave(alvinia, florian)\nforall x (Shoplift(x, florian) and Notarize(florian, alvinia) -> Knavish(florian))\nforall x (Shoplift(x, florian) -> Afloat(florian))\nShoplift(alvinia, florian) and Shoplift(florian, alvinia) -> Partisan(florian)\n\nnot Knavish(florian)\n\nShoplift(alvinia, florian) and Notarize(florian, alvinia) and forall x (Shoplift(x, florian) and Notarize(florian, alvinia) -> Knavish(florian)) -> therefore Knavish(florian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The jeffery crenel the silvano. The jeffery is denotive. The jeffery is ungroomed. The jeffery is leathered. The jeffery is monecious. The jeffery is avuncular. The jeffery decoct the silvano. The jeffery discerp the silvano. The silvano crenel the jeffery. The silvano is denotive. The silvano is ungroomed. The silvano is leathered. The silvano is avuncular. The silvano decoct the jeffery. The silvano discerp the jeffery. If the silvano discerp the jeffery and the jeffery is monecious then the silvano is leathered. Nice people are denotive. If someone crenel the silvano and they are leathered then the silvano is denotive. If the silvano crenel the jeffery and the jeffery crenel the silvano then the silvano discerp the jeffery. If the jeffery crenel the silvano and the silvano crenel the jeffery then the jeffery decoct the silvano. If someone crenel the silvano and the silvano discerp the jeffery then the silvano is monecious. If someone crenel the silvano then the silvano is leathered. If the jeffery crenel the silvano and the silvano crenel the jeffery then the silvano is avuncular. The silvano does not visit the silvano.", "logic": "\nCrenel(jeffery, silvano)\nDenotive(jeffery)\nUngroomed(jeffery)\nLeathered(jeffery)\nMonecious(jeffery)\nAvuncular(jeffery)\nDecoct(jeffery, silvano)\nDiscerp(jeffery, silvano)\nCrenel(silvano, jeffery)\nDenotive(silvano)\nUngroomed(silvano)\nLeathered(silvano)\nAvuncular(silvano)\nDecoct(silvano, jeffery)\nDiscerp(silvano, jeffery)\nDiscerp(silvano, jeffery) and Monecious(jeffery) -> Leathered(silvano)\nforall x (Leathered(x) -> Denotive(x))\nforall x (Crenel(x, silvano) and Leathered(x) -> Denotive(silvano))\nCrenel(silvano, jeffery) and Crenel(jeffery, silvano) -> Discerp(silvano, jeffery)\nCrenel(jeffery, silvano) and Crenel(silvano, jeffery) -> Decoct(jeffery, silvano)\nforall x (Crenel(x, silvano) and Discerp(silvano, jeffery) -> Monecious(silvano))\nforall x (Crenel(x, silvano) -> Leathered(silvano))\nCrenel(jeffery, silvano) and Crenel(silvano, jeffery) -> Avuncular(silvano)\n\nnot Discerp(silvano, silvano)\n\nnot Discerp(silvano, silvano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The bruce unthaw the wolfgang. The bruce is unexploded. The bruce is hilar. The bruce is finical. The bruce is damnatory. The bruce is mormon. The bruce chuckle the wolfgang. The bruce unweave the wolfgang. The wolfgang unthaw the bruce. The wolfgang is unexploded. The wolfgang is hilar. The wolfgang is finical. The wolfgang is mormon. The wolfgang chuckle the bruce. The wolfgang unweave the bruce. If the wolfgang unweave the bruce and the bruce is damnatory then the wolfgang is finical. Nice people are unexploded. If someone unthaw the wolfgang and they are finical then the wolfgang is unexploded. If the wolfgang unthaw the bruce and the bruce unthaw the wolfgang then the wolfgang unweave the bruce. If the bruce unthaw the wolfgang and the wolfgang unthaw the bruce then the bruce chuckle the wolfgang. If someone unthaw the wolfgang and the wolfgang unweave the bruce then the wolfgang is damnatory. If someone unthaw the wolfgang then the wolfgang is finical. If the bruce unthaw the wolfgang and the wolfgang unthaw the bruce then the wolfgang is mormon. The bruce unthaw the bruce.", "logic": "\nUnthaw(bruce, wolfgang)\nUnexploded(bruce)\nHilar(bruce)\nFinical(bruce)\nDamnatory(bruce)\nMormon(bruce)\nChuckle(bruce, wolfgang)\nUnweave(bruce, wolfgang)\nUnthaw(wolfgang, bruce)\nUnexploded(wolfgang)\nHilar(wolfgang)\nFinical(wolfgang)\nMormon(wolfgang)\nChuckle(wolfgang, bruce)\nUnweave(wolfgang, bruce)\nUnweave(wolfgang, bruce) and Damnatory(bruce) -> Finical(wolfgang)\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Unexploded(x))\nforall x (Unthaw(x, wolfgang) and Finical(x) -> Unexploded(wolfgang))\nUnthaw(wolfgang, bruce) and Unthaw(bruce, wolfgang) -> Unweave(wolfgang, bruce)\nUnthaw(bruce, wolfgang) and Unthaw(wolfgang, bruce) -> Chuckle(bruce, wolfgang)\nforall x (Unthaw(x, wolfgang) and Unweave(wolfgang, bruce) -> Damnatory(wolfgang))\nforall x (Unthaw(x, wolfgang) -> Finical(wolfgang))\nUnthaw(bruce, wolfgang) and Unthaw(wolfgang, bruce) -> Mormon(wolfgang)\n\nUnthaw(bruce, bruce)\n\nUnthaw(bruce, bruce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The randolf pawn the levon. The randolf is hindmost. The randolf is sedentary. The randolf is congested. The randolf is mandibular. The randolf is antitypic. The randolf focalise the levon. The randolf navigate the levon. The levon pawn the randolf. The levon is hindmost. The levon is sedentary. The levon is congested. The levon is antitypic. The levon focalise the randolf. The levon navigate the randolf. If the levon navigate the randolf and the randolf is mandibular then the levon is congested. Nice people are hindmost. If someone pawn the levon and they are congested then the levon is hindmost. If the levon pawn the randolf and the randolf pawn the levon then the levon navigate the randolf. If the randolf pawn the levon and the levon pawn the randolf then the randolf focalise the levon. If someone pawn the levon and the levon navigate the randolf then the levon is mandibular. If someone pawn the levon then the levon is congested. If the randolf pawn the levon and the levon pawn the randolf then the levon is antitypic. The randolf does not see the randolf.", "logic": "\nPawn(randolf, levon)\nHindmost(randolf)\nSedentary(randolf)\nCongested(randolf)\nMandibular(randolf)\nAntitypic(randolf)\nFocalise(randolf, levon)\nNavigate(randolf, levon)\nPawn(levon, randolf)\nHindmost(levon)\nSedentary(levon)\nCongested(levon)\nAntitypic(levon)\nFocalise(levon, randolf)\nNavigate(levon, randolf)\nNavigate(levon, randolf) and Mandibular(randolf) -> Congested(levon)\nforall x (Congested(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Pawn(x, levon) and Congested(x) -> Hindmost(levon))\nPawn(levon, randolf) and Pawn(randolf, levon) -> Navigate(levon, randolf)\nPawn(randolf, levon) and Pawn(levon, randolf) -> Focalise(randolf, levon)\nforall x (Pawn(x, levon) and Navigate(levon, randolf) -> Mandibular(levon))\nforall x (Pawn(x, levon) -> Congested(levon))\nPawn(randolf, levon) and Pawn(levon, randolf) -> Antitypic(levon)\n\nnot Focalise(randolf, randolf)\n\nnot Focalise(randolf, randolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The jake spatchcock the curtis. The jake is phoney. The jake is meshugga. The jake is weird. The jake is imposing. The jake is straplike. The jake ozonise the curtis. The jake butt the curtis. The curtis spatchcock the jake. The curtis is phoney. The curtis is meshugga. The curtis is weird. The curtis is straplike. The curtis ozonise the jake. The curtis butt the jake. If the curtis butt the jake and the jake is imposing then the curtis is weird. Nice people are phoney. If someone spatchcock the curtis and they are weird then the curtis is phoney. If the curtis spatchcock the jake and the jake spatchcock the curtis then the curtis butt the jake. If the jake spatchcock the curtis and the curtis spatchcock the jake then the jake ozonise the curtis. If someone spatchcock the curtis and the curtis butt the jake then the curtis is imposing. If someone spatchcock the curtis then the curtis is weird. If the jake spatchcock the curtis and the curtis spatchcock the jake then the curtis is straplike. The curtis ozonise the curtis.", "logic": "\nSpatchcock(jake, curtis)\nPhoney(jake)\nMeshugga(jake)\nWeird(jake)\nImposing(jake)\nStraplike(jake)\nOzonise(jake, curtis)\nButt(jake, curtis)\nSpatchcock(curtis, jake)\nPhoney(curtis)\nMeshugga(curtis)\nWeird(curtis)\nStraplike(curtis)\nOzonise(curtis, jake)\nButt(curtis, jake)\nButt(curtis, jake) and Imposing(jake) -> Weird(curtis)\nforall x (Weird(x) -> Phoney(x))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, curtis) and Weird(x) -> Phoney(curtis))\nSpatchcock(curtis, jake) and Spatchcock(jake, curtis) -> Butt(curtis, jake)\nSpatchcock(jake, curtis) and Spatchcock(curtis, jake) -> Ozonise(jake, curtis)\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, curtis) and Butt(curtis, jake) -> Imposing(curtis))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, curtis) -> Weird(curtis))\nSpatchcock(jake, curtis) and Spatchcock(curtis, jake) -> Straplike(curtis)\n\nOzonise(curtis, curtis)\n\nOzonise(curtis, curtis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2721"} {"premises": "The marla defect the dalila. The dalila immigrate the cameo. The cameo defect the dalila. If the marla defect the dalila then the dalila defect the cameo. If the marla is faddish and the marla defect the dalila then the dalila is unpaid. If someone is after then they are unpaid. If someone consist the marla and they chase the marla then the marla defect the cameo. If someone is grueling and bosky then they chase the dalila. If someone immigrate the marla and they see the cameo then the marla is unpaid. If someone defect the cameo then the cameo is unpaid. If someone is unpaid then they like the dalila. The marla defect the dalila.", "logic": "\nDefect(marla, dalila)\nImmigrate(dalila, cameo)\nDefect(cameo, dalila)\nDefect(marla, dalila) -> Defect(dalila, cameo)\nFaddish(marla) and Defect(marla, dalila) -> Unpaid(dalila)\nforall x (After(x) -> Unpaid(x))\nforall x (Consist(x, marla) and Defect(x, marla) -> Defect(marla, cameo))\nforall x (Grueling(x) and Bosky(x) -> Defect(x, dalila))\nforall x (Immigrate(x, marla) and Consist(x, cameo) -> Unpaid(marla))\nforall x (Defect(x, cameo) -> Unpaid(cameo))\nforall x (Unpaid(x) -> Immigrate(x, dalila))\n\nDefect(marla, dalila)\n\ntherefore Defect(marla, dalila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The gwennie devolve the alberta. The alberta sand the lemar. The lemar devolve the alberta. If the gwennie devolve the alberta then the alberta devolve the lemar. If the gwennie is feathered and the gwennie devolve the alberta then the alberta is shimmery. If someone is sealed then they are shimmery. If someone abolish the gwennie and they chase the gwennie then the gwennie devolve the lemar. If someone is babyish and isotopic then they chase the alberta. If someone sand the gwennie and they see the lemar then the gwennie is shimmery. If someone devolve the lemar then the lemar is shimmery. If someone is shimmery then they like the alberta. The gwennie does not chase the alberta.", "logic": "\nDevolve(gwennie, alberta)\nSand(alberta, lemar)\nDevolve(lemar, alberta)\nDevolve(gwennie, alberta) -> Devolve(alberta, lemar)\nFeathered(gwennie) and Devolve(gwennie, alberta) -> Shimmery(alberta)\nforall x (Sealed(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Abolish(x, gwennie) and Devolve(x, gwennie) -> Devolve(gwennie, lemar))\nforall x (Babyish(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Devolve(x, alberta))\nforall x (Sand(x, gwennie) and Abolish(x, lemar) -> Shimmery(gwennie))\nforall x (Devolve(x, lemar) -> Shimmery(lemar))\nforall x (Shimmery(x) -> Sand(x, alberta))\n\nnot Devolve(gwennie, alberta)\n\ntherefore Devolve(gwennie, alberta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The murial disburden the albertine. The albertine increase the gracie. The gracie disburden the albertine. If the murial disburden the albertine then the albertine disburden the gracie. If the murial is tonsured and the murial disburden the albertine then the albertine is lento. If someone is struck then they are lento. If someone samba the murial and they chase the murial then the murial disburden the gracie. If someone is intrusive and untenable then they chase the albertine. If someone increase the murial and they see the gracie then the murial is lento. If someone disburden the gracie then the gracie is lento. If someone is lento then they like the albertine. The albertine disburden the gracie.", "logic": "\nDisburden(murial, albertine)\nIncrease(albertine, gracie)\nDisburden(gracie, albertine)\nDisburden(murial, albertine) -> Disburden(albertine, gracie)\nTonsured(murial) and Disburden(murial, albertine) -> Lento(albertine)\nforall x (Struck(x) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Samba(x, murial) and Disburden(x, murial) -> Disburden(murial, gracie))\nforall x (Intrusive(x) and Untenable(x) -> Disburden(x, albertine))\nforall x (Increase(x, murial) and Samba(x, gracie) -> Lento(murial))\nforall x (Disburden(x, gracie) -> Lento(gracie))\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Increase(x, albertine))\n\nDisburden(albertine, gracie)\n\nDisburden(murial, albertine) and Disburden(murial, albertine) -> Disburden(albertine, gracie) -> therefore Disburden(albertine, gracie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The howie bushwhack the vicki. The vicki apotheose the alberto. The alberto bushwhack the vicki. If the howie bushwhack the vicki then the vicki bushwhack the alberto. If the howie is pressed and the howie bushwhack the vicki then the vicki is marmorean. If someone is uppermost then they are marmorean. If someone make the howie and they chase the howie then the howie bushwhack the alberto. If someone is collect and prostrate then they chase the vicki. If someone apotheose the howie and they see the alberto then the howie is marmorean. If someone bushwhack the alberto then the alberto is marmorean. If someone is marmorean then they like the vicki. The vicki does not chase the alberto.", "logic": "\nBushwhack(howie, vicki)\nApotheose(vicki, alberto)\nBushwhack(alberto, vicki)\nBushwhack(howie, vicki) -> Bushwhack(vicki, alberto)\nPressed(howie) and Bushwhack(howie, vicki) -> Marmorean(vicki)\nforall x (Uppermost(x) -> Marmorean(x))\nforall x (Make(x, howie) and Bushwhack(x, howie) -> Bushwhack(howie, alberto))\nforall x (Collect(x) and Prostrate(x) -> Bushwhack(x, vicki))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, howie) and Make(x, alberto) -> Marmorean(howie))\nforall x (Bushwhack(x, alberto) -> Marmorean(alberto))\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Apotheose(x, vicki))\n\nnot Bushwhack(vicki, alberto)\n\nBushwhack(howie, vicki) and Bushwhack(howie, vicki) -> Bushwhack(vicki, alberto) -> therefore Bushwhack(vicki, alberto)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The norrie account the edwin. The edwin tusk the luigi. The luigi account the edwin. If the norrie account the edwin then the edwin account the luigi. If the norrie is draining and the norrie account the edwin then the edwin is saddled. If someone is crocketed then they are saddled. If someone hobble the norrie and they chase the norrie then the norrie account the luigi. If someone is eccrine and uncensored then they chase the edwin. If someone tusk the norrie and they see the luigi then the norrie is saddled. If someone account the luigi then the luigi is saddled. If someone is saddled then they like the edwin. The luigi is saddled.", "logic": "\nAccount(norrie, edwin)\nTusk(edwin, luigi)\nAccount(luigi, edwin)\nAccount(norrie, edwin) -> Account(edwin, luigi)\nDraining(norrie) and Account(norrie, edwin) -> Saddled(edwin)\nforall x (Crocketed(x) -> Saddled(x))\nforall x (Hobble(x, norrie) and Account(x, norrie) -> Account(norrie, luigi))\nforall x (Eccrine(x) and Uncensored(x) -> Account(x, edwin))\nforall x (Tusk(x, norrie) and Hobble(x, luigi) -> Saddled(norrie))\nforall x (Account(x, luigi) -> Saddled(luigi))\nforall x (Saddled(x) -> Tusk(x, edwin))\n\nSaddled(luigi)\n\nAccount(norrie, edwin) and Account(norrie, edwin) -> Account(edwin, luigi) -> therefore Account(edwin, luigi) Account(edwin, luigi) and forall x (Account(x, luigi) -> Saddled(luigi)) -> therefore Saddled(luigi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The sky evert the cesya. The cesya soften the maryrose. The maryrose evert the cesya. If the sky evert the cesya then the cesya evert the maryrose. If the sky is unheralded and the sky evert the cesya then the cesya is imploring. If someone is calumnious then they are imploring. If someone mewl the sky and they chase the sky then the sky evert the maryrose. If someone is regardful and sandlike then they chase the cesya. If someone soften the sky and they see the maryrose then the sky is imploring. If someone evert the maryrose then the maryrose is imploring. If someone is imploring then they like the cesya. The maryrose is not imploring.", "logic": "\nEvert(sky, cesya)\nSoften(cesya, maryrose)\nEvert(maryrose, cesya)\nEvert(sky, cesya) -> Evert(cesya, maryrose)\nUnheralded(sky) and Evert(sky, cesya) -> Imploring(cesya)\nforall x (Calumnious(x) -> Imploring(x))\nforall x (Mewl(x, sky) and Evert(x, sky) -> Evert(sky, maryrose))\nforall x (Regardful(x) and Sandlike(x) -> Evert(x, cesya))\nforall x (Soften(x, sky) and Mewl(x, maryrose) -> Imploring(sky))\nforall x (Evert(x, maryrose) -> Imploring(maryrose))\nforall x (Imploring(x) -> Soften(x, cesya))\n\nnot Imploring(maryrose)\n\nEvert(sky, cesya) and Evert(sky, cesya) -> Evert(cesya, maryrose) -> therefore Evert(cesya, maryrose) Evert(cesya, maryrose) and forall x (Evert(x, maryrose) -> Imploring(maryrose)) -> therefore Imploring(maryrose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The elana spark the ebeneser. The ebeneser aggress the brandice. The brandice spark the ebeneser. If the elana spark the ebeneser then the ebeneser spark the brandice. If the elana is supported and the elana spark the ebeneser then the ebeneser is unsuasible. If someone is crenate then they are unsuasible. If someone mutter the elana and they chase the elana then the elana spark the brandice. If someone is delineate and backmost then they chase the ebeneser. If someone aggress the elana and they see the brandice then the elana is unsuasible. If someone spark the brandice then the brandice is unsuasible. If someone is unsuasible then they like the ebeneser. The brandice aggress the ebeneser.", "logic": "\nSpark(elana, ebeneser)\nAggress(ebeneser, brandice)\nSpark(brandice, ebeneser)\nSpark(elana, ebeneser) -> Spark(ebeneser, brandice)\nSupported(elana) and Spark(elana, ebeneser) -> Unsuasible(ebeneser)\nforall x (Crenate(x) -> Unsuasible(x))\nforall x (Mutter(x, elana) and Spark(x, elana) -> Spark(elana, brandice))\nforall x (Delineate(x) and Backmost(x) -> Spark(x, ebeneser))\nforall x (Aggress(x, elana) and Mutter(x, brandice) -> Unsuasible(elana))\nforall x (Spark(x, brandice) -> Unsuasible(brandice))\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Aggress(x, ebeneser))\n\nAggress(brandice, ebeneser)\n\nSpark(elana, ebeneser) and Spark(elana, ebeneser) -> Spark(ebeneser, brandice) -> therefore Spark(ebeneser, brandice) Spark(ebeneser, brandice) and forall x (Spark(x, brandice) -> Unsuasible(brandice)) -> therefore Unsuasible(brandice) Unsuasible(brandice) and forall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Aggress(x, ebeneser)) -> therefore Aggress(brandice, ebeneser)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The danny backcross the fredrika. The fredrika purpose the katusha. The katusha backcross the fredrika. If the danny backcross the fredrika then the fredrika backcross the katusha. If the danny is asat and the danny backcross the fredrika then the fredrika is lymphoid. If someone is joking then they are lymphoid. If someone publicize the danny and they chase the danny then the danny backcross the katusha. If someone is dislikable and fatless then they chase the fredrika. If someone purpose the danny and they see the katusha then the danny is lymphoid. If someone backcross the katusha then the katusha is lymphoid. If someone is lymphoid then they like the fredrika. The katusha does not like the fredrika.", "logic": "\nBackcross(danny, fredrika)\nPurpose(fredrika, katusha)\nBackcross(katusha, fredrika)\nBackcross(danny, fredrika) -> Backcross(fredrika, katusha)\nAsat(danny) and Backcross(danny, fredrika) -> Lymphoid(fredrika)\nforall x (Joking(x) -> Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Publicize(x, danny) and Backcross(x, danny) -> Backcross(danny, katusha))\nforall x (Dislikable(x) and Fatless(x) -> Backcross(x, fredrika))\nforall x (Purpose(x, danny) and Publicize(x, katusha) -> Lymphoid(danny))\nforall x (Backcross(x, katusha) -> Lymphoid(katusha))\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Purpose(x, fredrika))\n\nnot Purpose(katusha, fredrika)\n\nBackcross(danny, fredrika) and Backcross(danny, fredrika) -> Backcross(fredrika, katusha) -> therefore Backcross(fredrika, katusha) Backcross(fredrika, katusha) and forall x (Backcross(x, katusha) -> Lymphoid(katusha)) -> therefore Lymphoid(katusha) Lymphoid(katusha) and forall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Purpose(x, fredrika)) -> therefore Purpose(katusha, fredrika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The andi reprobate the seamus. The seamus generalize the yvette. The yvette reprobate the seamus. If the andi reprobate the seamus then the seamus reprobate the yvette. If the andi is subaltern and the andi reprobate the seamus then the seamus is prudential. If someone is blushing then they are prudential. If someone depend the andi and they chase the andi then the andi reprobate the yvette. If someone is fricative and imprudent then they chase the seamus. If someone generalize the andi and they see the yvette then the andi is prudential. If someone reprobate the yvette then the yvette is prudential. If someone is prudential then they like the seamus. The seamus does not like the seamus.", "logic": "\nReprobate(andi, seamus)\nGeneralize(seamus, yvette)\nReprobate(yvette, seamus)\nReprobate(andi, seamus) -> Reprobate(seamus, yvette)\nSubaltern(andi) and Reprobate(andi, seamus) -> Prudential(seamus)\nforall x (Blushing(x) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Depend(x, andi) and Reprobate(x, andi) -> Reprobate(andi, yvette))\nforall x (Fricative(x) and Imprudent(x) -> Reprobate(x, seamus))\nforall x (Generalize(x, andi) and Depend(x, yvette) -> Prudential(andi))\nforall x (Reprobate(x, yvette) -> Prudential(yvette))\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> Generalize(x, seamus))\n\nnot Generalize(seamus, seamus)\n\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> Generalize(x, seamus)) <- Subaltern(andi) and Reprobate(andi, seamus) -> Prudential(seamus) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The sanderson rumpus the deryl. The deryl decoke the darda. The darda rumpus the deryl. If the sanderson rumpus the deryl then the deryl rumpus the darda. If the sanderson is teary and the sanderson rumpus the deryl then the deryl is bated. If someone is deadly then they are bated. If someone descant the sanderson and they chase the sanderson then the sanderson rumpus the darda. If someone is billowy and iraqi then they chase the deryl. If someone decoke the sanderson and they see the darda then the sanderson is bated. If someone rumpus the darda then the darda is bated. If someone is bated then they like the deryl. The sanderson decoke the deryl.", "logic": "\nRumpus(sanderson, deryl)\nDecoke(deryl, darda)\nRumpus(darda, deryl)\nRumpus(sanderson, deryl) -> Rumpus(deryl, darda)\nTeary(sanderson) and Rumpus(sanderson, deryl) -> Bated(deryl)\nforall x (Deadly(x) -> Bated(x))\nforall x (Descant(x, sanderson) and Rumpus(x, sanderson) -> Rumpus(sanderson, darda))\nforall x (Billowy(x) and Iraqi(x) -> Rumpus(x, deryl))\nforall x (Decoke(x, sanderson) and Descant(x, darda) -> Bated(sanderson))\nforall x (Rumpus(x, darda) -> Bated(darda))\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Decoke(x, deryl))\n\nDecoke(sanderson, deryl)\n\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Decoke(x, deryl)) <- forall x (Deadly(x) -> Bated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The bianca seethe the othella. The othella reevaluate the arleta. The arleta seethe the othella. If the bianca seethe the othella then the othella seethe the arleta. If the bianca is tigerish and the bianca seethe the othella then the othella is derivative. If someone is torturous then they are derivative. If someone dapple the bianca and they chase the bianca then the bianca seethe the arleta. If someone is multiphase and susurrant then they chase the othella. If someone reevaluate the bianca and they see the arleta then the bianca is derivative. If someone seethe the arleta then the arleta is derivative. If someone is derivative then they like the othella. The othella does not chase the othella.", "logic": "\nSeethe(bianca, othella)\nReevaluate(othella, arleta)\nSeethe(arleta, othella)\nSeethe(bianca, othella) -> Seethe(othella, arleta)\nTigerish(bianca) and Seethe(bianca, othella) -> Derivative(othella)\nforall x (Torturous(x) -> Derivative(x))\nforall x (Dapple(x, bianca) and Seethe(x, bianca) -> Seethe(bianca, arleta))\nforall x (Multiphase(x) and Susurrant(x) -> Seethe(x, othella))\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, bianca) and Dapple(x, arleta) -> Derivative(bianca))\nforall x (Seethe(x, arleta) -> Derivative(arleta))\nforall x (Derivative(x) -> Reevaluate(x, othella))\n\nnot Seethe(othella, othella)\n\nforall x (Multiphase(x) and Susurrant(x) -> Seethe(x, othella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The beowulf sleek the melodee. The melodee forgather the yolanda. The yolanda sleek the melodee. If the beowulf sleek the melodee then the melodee sleek the yolanda. If the beowulf is improbable and the beowulf sleek the melodee then the melodee is syllabled. If someone is biogenous then they are syllabled. If someone betide the beowulf and they chase the beowulf then the beowulf sleek the yolanda. If someone is lamarckian and decent then they chase the melodee. If someone forgather the beowulf and they see the yolanda then the beowulf is syllabled. If someone sleek the yolanda then the yolanda is syllabled. If someone is syllabled then they like the melodee. The beowulf is syllabled.", "logic": "\nSleek(beowulf, melodee)\nForgather(melodee, yolanda)\nSleek(yolanda, melodee)\nSleek(beowulf, melodee) -> Sleek(melodee, yolanda)\nImprobable(beowulf) and Sleek(beowulf, melodee) -> Syllabled(melodee)\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Syllabled(x))\nforall x (Betide(x, beowulf) and Sleek(x, beowulf) -> Sleek(beowulf, yolanda))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) and Decent(x) -> Sleek(x, melodee))\nforall x (Forgather(x, beowulf) and Betide(x, yolanda) -> Syllabled(beowulf))\nforall x (Sleek(x, yolanda) -> Syllabled(yolanda))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) -> Forgather(x, melodee))\n\nSyllabled(beowulf)\n\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Syllabled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The glorianna stack the chester. The chester cloture the cathie. The cathie stack the chester. If the glorianna stack the chester then the chester stack the cathie. If the glorianna is raining and the glorianna stack the chester then the chester is hobnailed. If someone is pyretic then they are hobnailed. If someone destain the glorianna and they chase the glorianna then the glorianna stack the cathie. If someone is uncaulked and sunken then they chase the chester. If someone cloture the glorianna and they see the cathie then the glorianna is hobnailed. If someone stack the cathie then the cathie is hobnailed. If someone is hobnailed then they like the chester. The glorianna does not like the cathie.", "logic": "\nStack(glorianna, chester)\nCloture(chester, cathie)\nStack(cathie, chester)\nStack(glorianna, chester) -> Stack(chester, cathie)\nRaining(glorianna) and Stack(glorianna, chester) -> Hobnailed(chester)\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Hobnailed(x))\nforall x (Destain(x, glorianna) and Stack(x, glorianna) -> Stack(glorianna, cathie))\nforall x (Uncaulked(x) and Sunken(x) -> Stack(x, chester))\nforall x (Cloture(x, glorianna) and Destain(x, cathie) -> Hobnailed(glorianna))\nforall x (Stack(x, cathie) -> Hobnailed(cathie))\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) -> Cloture(x, chester))\n\nnot Cloture(glorianna, cathie)\n\nnot Cloture(glorianna, cathie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The elsy palm the lizbeth. The lizbeth pump the adelind. The adelind palm the lizbeth. If the elsy palm the lizbeth then the lizbeth palm the adelind. If the elsy is sourish and the elsy palm the lizbeth then the lizbeth is personable. If someone is corroded then they are personable. If someone nasalise the elsy and they chase the elsy then the elsy palm the adelind. If someone is worried and optical then they chase the lizbeth. If someone pump the elsy and they see the adelind then the elsy is personable. If someone palm the adelind then the adelind is personable. If someone is personable then they like the lizbeth. The lizbeth is optical.", "logic": "\nPalm(elsy, lizbeth)\nPump(lizbeth, adelind)\nPalm(adelind, lizbeth)\nPalm(elsy, lizbeth) -> Palm(lizbeth, adelind)\nSourish(elsy) and Palm(elsy, lizbeth) -> Personable(lizbeth)\nforall x (Corroded(x) -> Personable(x))\nforall x (Nasalise(x, elsy) and Palm(x, elsy) -> Palm(elsy, adelind))\nforall x (Worried(x) and Optical(x) -> Palm(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Pump(x, elsy) and Nasalise(x, adelind) -> Personable(elsy))\nforall x (Palm(x, adelind) -> Personable(adelind))\nforall x (Personable(x) -> Pump(x, lizbeth))\n\nOptical(lizbeth)\n\nOptical(lizbeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The thedrick foreordain the binnie. The binnie walk the gwendolyn. The gwendolyn foreordain the binnie. If the thedrick foreordain the binnie then the binnie foreordain the gwendolyn. If the thedrick is cerebral and the thedrick foreordain the binnie then the binnie is unpictured. If someone is setose then they are unpictured. If someone fluster the thedrick and they chase the thedrick then the thedrick foreordain the gwendolyn. If someone is phallic and brownish then they chase the binnie. If someone walk the thedrick and they see the gwendolyn then the thedrick is unpictured. If someone foreordain the gwendolyn then the gwendolyn is unpictured. If someone is unpictured then they like the binnie. The gwendolyn is not setose.", "logic": "\nForeordain(thedrick, binnie)\nWalk(binnie, gwendolyn)\nForeordain(gwendolyn, binnie)\nForeordain(thedrick, binnie) -> Foreordain(binnie, gwendolyn)\nCerebral(thedrick) and Foreordain(thedrick, binnie) -> Unpictured(binnie)\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Unpictured(x))\nforall x (Fluster(x, thedrick) and Foreordain(x, thedrick) -> Foreordain(thedrick, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Phallic(x) and Brownish(x) -> Foreordain(x, binnie))\nforall x (Walk(x, thedrick) and Fluster(x, gwendolyn) -> Unpictured(thedrick))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, gwendolyn) -> Unpictured(gwendolyn))\nforall x (Unpictured(x) -> Walk(x, binnie))\n\nnot Setose(gwendolyn)\n\nnot Setose(gwendolyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "The flem skydive the burl. The burl pleach the berny. The berny skydive the burl. If the flem skydive the burl then the burl skydive the berny. If the flem is aglitter and the flem skydive the burl then the burl is unbeholden. If someone is inaugural then they are unbeholden. If someone strengthen the flem and they chase the flem then the flem skydive the berny. If someone is unlaced and saintlike then they chase the burl. If someone pleach the flem and they see the berny then the flem is unbeholden. If someone skydive the berny then the berny is unbeholden. If someone is unbeholden then they like the burl. The flem is aglitter.", "logic": "\nSkydive(flem, burl)\nPleach(burl, berny)\nSkydive(berny, burl)\nSkydive(flem, burl) -> Skydive(burl, berny)\nAglitter(flem) and Skydive(flem, burl) -> Unbeholden(burl)\nforall x (Inaugural(x) -> Unbeholden(x))\nforall x (Strengthen(x, flem) and Skydive(x, flem) -> Skydive(flem, berny))\nforall x (Unlaced(x) and Saintlike(x) -> Skydive(x, burl))\nforall x (Pleach(x, flem) and Strengthen(x, berny) -> Unbeholden(flem))\nforall x (Skydive(x, berny) -> Unbeholden(berny))\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) -> Pleach(x, burl))\n\nAglitter(flem)\n\nAglitter(flem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1251"} {"premises": "Konrad is sniffly. Konrad is not potable. Konrad is invertible. Konrad is protestant. Konrad is lexical. Konrad is obtrusive. Hanford is sniffly. Hanford is protestant. Hanford is amendable. Cyndy is sniffly. Cyndy is potable. Cyndy is invertible. Cyndy is protestant. Cyndy is amendable. Cyndy is obtrusive. If Hanford is protestant and Hanford is amendable then Hanford is invertible. If Konrad is amendable then Konrad is obtrusive. If something is amendable and not sniffly then it is invertible. If Cyndy is potable then Cyndy is amendable. If something is obtrusive and lexical then it is not potable. If something is amendable and not obtrusive then it is potable. Konrad is protestant.", "logic": "\nSniffly(konrad)\nnot Potable(konrad)\nInvertible(konrad)\nProtestant(konrad)\nLexical(konrad)\nObtrusive(konrad)\nSniffly(hanford)\nProtestant(hanford)\nAmendable(hanford)\nSniffly(cyndy)\nPotable(cyndy)\nInvertible(cyndy)\nProtestant(cyndy)\nAmendable(cyndy)\nObtrusive(cyndy)\nProtestant(hanford) and Amendable(hanford) -> Invertible(hanford)\nAmendable(konrad) -> Obtrusive(konrad)\nforall x (Amendable(x) and not Sniffly(x) -> Invertible(x))\nPotable(cyndy) -> Amendable(cyndy)\nforall x (Obtrusive(x) and Lexical(x) -> not Potable(x))\nforall x (Amendable(x) and not Obtrusive(x) -> Potable(x))\n\nProtestant(konrad)\n\ntherefore Protestant(konrad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Nike is infrared. Nike is not glaswegian. Nike is tibetan. Nike is bootleg. Nike is incurable. Nike is lingulate. Candide is infrared. Candide is bootleg. Candide is nugatory. Collette is infrared. Collette is glaswegian. Collette is tibetan. Collette is bootleg. Collette is nugatory. Collette is lingulate. If Candide is bootleg and Candide is nugatory then Candide is tibetan. If Nike is nugatory then Nike is lingulate. If something is nugatory and not infrared then it is tibetan. If Collette is glaswegian then Collette is nugatory. If something is lingulate and incurable then it is not glaswegian. If something is nugatory and not lingulate then it is glaswegian. Nike is not infrared.", "logic": "\nInfrared(nike)\nnot Glaswegian(nike)\nTibetan(nike)\nBootleg(nike)\nIncurable(nike)\nLingulate(nike)\nInfrared(candide)\nBootleg(candide)\nNugatory(candide)\nInfrared(collette)\nGlaswegian(collette)\nTibetan(collette)\nBootleg(collette)\nNugatory(collette)\nLingulate(collette)\nBootleg(candide) and Nugatory(candide) -> Tibetan(candide)\nNugatory(nike) -> Lingulate(nike)\nforall x (Nugatory(x) and not Infrared(x) -> Tibetan(x))\nGlaswegian(collette) -> Nugatory(collette)\nforall x (Lingulate(x) and Incurable(x) -> not Glaswegian(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) and not Lingulate(x) -> Glaswegian(x))\n\nnot Infrared(nike)\n\ntherefore Infrared(nike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Anson is ascribable. Anson is not nonprofit. Anson is unnameable. Anson is exultant. Anson is gargantuan. Anson is muddled. Mylo is ascribable. Mylo is exultant. Mylo is myelinic. Winford is ascribable. Winford is nonprofit. Winford is unnameable. Winford is exultant. Winford is myelinic. Winford is muddled. If Mylo is exultant and Mylo is myelinic then Mylo is unnameable. If Anson is myelinic then Anson is muddled. If something is myelinic and not ascribable then it is unnameable. If Winford is nonprofit then Winford is myelinic. If something is muddled and gargantuan then it is not nonprofit. If something is myelinic and not muddled then it is nonprofit. Mylo is unnameable.", "logic": "\nAscribable(anson)\nnot Nonprofit(anson)\nUnnameable(anson)\nExultant(anson)\nGargantuan(anson)\nMuddled(anson)\nAscribable(mylo)\nExultant(mylo)\nMyelinic(mylo)\nAscribable(winford)\nNonprofit(winford)\nUnnameable(winford)\nExultant(winford)\nMyelinic(winford)\nMuddled(winford)\nExultant(mylo) and Myelinic(mylo) -> Unnameable(mylo)\nMyelinic(anson) -> Muddled(anson)\nforall x (Myelinic(x) and not Ascribable(x) -> Unnameable(x))\nNonprofit(winford) -> Myelinic(winford)\nforall x (Muddled(x) and Gargantuan(x) -> not Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Myelinic(x) and not Muddled(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\n\nUnnameable(mylo)\n\nExultant(mylo) and Myelinic(mylo) and Exultant(mylo) and Myelinic(mylo) -> Unnameable(mylo) -> therefore Unnameable(mylo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Fanny is antiphonal. Fanny is not quelled. Fanny is scrambled. Fanny is biserrate. Fanny is fossilized. Fanny is subfusc. Farley is antiphonal. Farley is biserrate. Farley is accurate. Pamella is antiphonal. Pamella is quelled. Pamella is scrambled. Pamella is biserrate. Pamella is accurate. Pamella is subfusc. If Farley is biserrate and Farley is accurate then Farley is scrambled. If Fanny is accurate then Fanny is subfusc. If something is accurate and not antiphonal then it is scrambled. If Pamella is quelled then Pamella is accurate. If something is subfusc and fossilized then it is not quelled. If something is accurate and not subfusc then it is quelled. Farley is not scrambled.", "logic": "\nAntiphonal(fanny)\nnot Quelled(fanny)\nScrambled(fanny)\nBiserrate(fanny)\nFossilized(fanny)\nSubfusc(fanny)\nAntiphonal(farley)\nBiserrate(farley)\nAccurate(farley)\nAntiphonal(pamella)\nQuelled(pamella)\nScrambled(pamella)\nBiserrate(pamella)\nAccurate(pamella)\nSubfusc(pamella)\nBiserrate(farley) and Accurate(farley) -> Scrambled(farley)\nAccurate(fanny) -> Subfusc(fanny)\nforall x (Accurate(x) and not Antiphonal(x) -> Scrambled(x))\nQuelled(pamella) -> Accurate(pamella)\nforall x (Subfusc(x) and Fossilized(x) -> not Quelled(x))\nforall x (Accurate(x) and not Subfusc(x) -> Quelled(x))\n\nnot Scrambled(farley)\n\nBiserrate(farley) and Accurate(farley) and Biserrate(farley) and Accurate(farley) -> Scrambled(farley) -> therefore Scrambled(farley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Tuesday is hirsute. Tuesday is not starless. Tuesday is referent. Tuesday is upper. Tuesday is guttural. Tuesday is unstarred. Glenna is hirsute. Glenna is upper. Glenna is mordant. Phylis is hirsute. Phylis is starless. Phylis is referent. Phylis is upper. Phylis is mordant. Phylis is unstarred. If Glenna is upper and Glenna is mordant then Glenna is referent. If Tuesday is mordant then Tuesday is unstarred. If something is mordant and not hirsute then it is referent. If Phylis is starless then Phylis is mordant. If something is unstarred and guttural then it is not starless. If something is mordant and not unstarred then it is starless. Glenna is not starless.", "logic": "\nHirsute(tuesday)\nnot Starless(tuesday)\nReferent(tuesday)\nUpper(tuesday)\nGuttural(tuesday)\nUnstarred(tuesday)\nHirsute(glenna)\nUpper(glenna)\nMordant(glenna)\nHirsute(phylis)\nStarless(phylis)\nReferent(phylis)\nUpper(phylis)\nMordant(phylis)\nUnstarred(phylis)\nUpper(glenna) and Mordant(glenna) -> Referent(glenna)\nMordant(tuesday) -> Unstarred(tuesday)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and not Hirsute(x) -> Referent(x))\nStarless(phylis) -> Mordant(phylis)\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and Guttural(x) -> not Starless(x))\nforall x (Mordant(x) and not Unstarred(x) -> Starless(x))\n\nnot Starless(glenna)\n\nforall x (Mordant(x) and not Unstarred(x) -> Starless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Sheela is phenomenal. Sheela is not softening. Sheela is asterismal. Sheela is cosmologic. Sheela is sniffly. Sheela is insolvent. Aram is phenomenal. Aram is cosmologic. Aram is fistular. Rhetta is phenomenal. Rhetta is softening. Rhetta is asterismal. Rhetta is cosmologic. Rhetta is fistular. Rhetta is insolvent. If Aram is cosmologic and Aram is fistular then Aram is asterismal. If Sheela is fistular then Sheela is insolvent. If something is fistular and not phenomenal then it is asterismal. If Rhetta is softening then Rhetta is fistular. If something is insolvent and sniffly then it is not softening. If something is fistular and not insolvent then it is softening. Sheela is fistular.", "logic": "\nPhenomenal(sheela)\nnot Softening(sheela)\nAsterismal(sheela)\nCosmologic(sheela)\nSniffly(sheela)\nInsolvent(sheela)\nPhenomenal(aram)\nCosmologic(aram)\nFistular(aram)\nPhenomenal(rhetta)\nSoftening(rhetta)\nAsterismal(rhetta)\nCosmologic(rhetta)\nFistular(rhetta)\nInsolvent(rhetta)\nCosmologic(aram) and Fistular(aram) -> Asterismal(aram)\nFistular(sheela) -> Insolvent(sheela)\nforall x (Fistular(x) and not Phenomenal(x) -> Asterismal(x))\nSoftening(rhetta) -> Fistular(rhetta)\nforall x (Insolvent(x) and Sniffly(x) -> not Softening(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) and not Insolvent(x) -> Softening(x))\n\nFistular(sheela)\n\nFistular(sheela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Tiffie is extramural. Tiffie is not peccant. Tiffie is plutonic. Tiffie is egoistical. Tiffie is embryonal. Tiffie is fistular. Sibley is extramural. Sibley is egoistical. Sibley is pushful. Bartlet is extramural. Bartlet is peccant. Bartlet is plutonic. Bartlet is egoistical. Bartlet is pushful. Bartlet is fistular. If Sibley is egoistical and Sibley is pushful then Sibley is plutonic. If Tiffie is pushful then Tiffie is fistular. If something is pushful and not extramural then it is plutonic. If Bartlet is peccant then Bartlet is pushful. If something is fistular and embryonal then it is not peccant. If something is pushful and not fistular then it is peccant. Sibley is not fistular.", "logic": "\nExtramural(tiffie)\nnot Peccant(tiffie)\nPlutonic(tiffie)\nEgoistical(tiffie)\nEmbryonal(tiffie)\nFistular(tiffie)\nExtramural(sibley)\nEgoistical(sibley)\nPushful(sibley)\nExtramural(bartlet)\nPeccant(bartlet)\nPlutonic(bartlet)\nEgoistical(bartlet)\nPushful(bartlet)\nFistular(bartlet)\nEgoistical(sibley) and Pushful(sibley) -> Plutonic(sibley)\nPushful(tiffie) -> Fistular(tiffie)\nforall x (Pushful(x) and not Extramural(x) -> Plutonic(x))\nPeccant(bartlet) -> Pushful(bartlet)\nforall x (Fistular(x) and Embryonal(x) -> not Peccant(x))\nforall x (Pushful(x) and not Fistular(x) -> Peccant(x))\n\nnot Fistular(sibley)\n\nnot Fistular(sibley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Renado is petrifying. Renado is not undefiled. Renado is colloidal. Renado is humanist. Renado is permeant. Renado is spineless. Kesley is petrifying. Kesley is humanist. Kesley is swarthy. Tobe is petrifying. Tobe is undefiled. Tobe is colloidal. Tobe is humanist. Tobe is swarthy. Tobe is spineless. If Kesley is humanist and Kesley is swarthy then Kesley is colloidal. If Renado is swarthy then Renado is spineless. If something is swarthy and not petrifying then it is colloidal. If Tobe is undefiled then Tobe is swarthy. If something is spineless and permeant then it is not undefiled. If something is swarthy and not spineless then it is undefiled. Tobe is permeant.", "logic": "\nPetrifying(renado)\nnot Undefiled(renado)\nColloidal(renado)\nHumanist(renado)\nPermeant(renado)\nSpineless(renado)\nPetrifying(kesley)\nHumanist(kesley)\nSwarthy(kesley)\nPetrifying(tobe)\nUndefiled(tobe)\nColloidal(tobe)\nHumanist(tobe)\nSwarthy(tobe)\nSpineless(tobe)\nHumanist(kesley) and Swarthy(kesley) -> Colloidal(kesley)\nSwarthy(renado) -> Spineless(renado)\nforall x (Swarthy(x) and not Petrifying(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nUndefiled(tobe) -> Swarthy(tobe)\nforall x (Spineless(x) and Permeant(x) -> not Undefiled(x))\nforall x (Swarthy(x) and not Spineless(x) -> Undefiled(x))\n\nPermeant(tobe)\n\nPermeant(tobe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1665"} {"premises": "Shane is unsexed. Shane is chartreuse. Lionel is unsexed. Lionel is chartreuse. Lionel is minute. Lionel is adorned. Lionel is perforated. Lionel is pilotless. Granville is ischemic. Granville is unsexed. Granville is chartreuse. Granville is minute. Granville is adorned. Granville is perforated. Granville is pilotless. If something is chartreuse then it is perforated. If Shane is unsexed and Shane is perforated then Shane is ischemic. All ischemic things are adorned. All adorned things are pilotless. If something is minute and pilotless then it is chartreuse. Green things are pilotless. If Shane is perforated and Shane is pilotless then Shane is chartreuse. If Shane is chartreuse and Shane is minute then Shane is adorned. Granville is chartreuse.", "logic": "\nUnsexed(shane)\nChartreuse(shane)\nUnsexed(lionel)\nChartreuse(lionel)\nMinute(lionel)\nAdorned(lionel)\nPerforated(lionel)\nPilotless(lionel)\nIschemic(granville)\nUnsexed(granville)\nChartreuse(granville)\nMinute(granville)\nAdorned(granville)\nPerforated(granville)\nPilotless(granville)\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) -> Perforated(x))\nUnsexed(shane) and Perforated(shane) -> Ischemic(shane)\nforall x (Ischemic(x) -> Adorned(x))\nforall x (Adorned(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nforall x (Minute(x) and Pilotless(x) -> Chartreuse(x))\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nPerforated(shane) and Pilotless(shane) -> Chartreuse(shane)\nChartreuse(shane) and Minute(shane) -> Adorned(shane)\n\nChartreuse(granville)\n\ntherefore Chartreuse(granville)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Elga is equipotent. Elga is ignoble. Datha is equipotent. Datha is ignoble. Datha is disclike. Datha is trackless. Datha is perinatal. Datha is euclidian. Gregory is paramount. Gregory is equipotent. Gregory is ignoble. Gregory is disclike. Gregory is trackless. Gregory is perinatal. Gregory is euclidian. If something is ignoble then it is perinatal. If Elga is equipotent and Elga is perinatal then Elga is paramount. All paramount things are trackless. All trackless things are euclidian. If something is disclike and euclidian then it is ignoble. Green things are euclidian. If Elga is perinatal and Elga is euclidian then Elga is ignoble. If Elga is ignoble and Elga is disclike then Elga is trackless. Gregory is not euclidian.", "logic": "\nEquipotent(elga)\nIgnoble(elga)\nEquipotent(datha)\nIgnoble(datha)\nDisclike(datha)\nTrackless(datha)\nPerinatal(datha)\nEuclidian(datha)\nParamount(gregory)\nEquipotent(gregory)\nIgnoble(gregory)\nDisclike(gregory)\nTrackless(gregory)\nPerinatal(gregory)\nEuclidian(gregory)\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Perinatal(x))\nEquipotent(elga) and Perinatal(elga) -> Paramount(elga)\nforall x (Paramount(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) -> Euclidian(x))\nforall x (Disclike(x) and Euclidian(x) -> Ignoble(x))\nforall x (Ignoble(x) -> Euclidian(x))\nPerinatal(elga) and Euclidian(elga) -> Ignoble(elga)\nIgnoble(elga) and Disclike(elga) -> Trackless(elga)\n\nnot Euclidian(gregory)\n\ntherefore Euclidian(gregory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Carlyle is terse. Carlyle is chinless. Courtenay is terse. Courtenay is chinless. Courtenay is inherent. Courtenay is ideal. Courtenay is noachian. Courtenay is telling. Peter is violated. Peter is terse. Peter is chinless. Peter is inherent. Peter is ideal. Peter is noachian. Peter is telling. If something is chinless then it is noachian. If Carlyle is terse and Carlyle is noachian then Carlyle is violated. All violated things are ideal. All ideal things are telling. If something is inherent and telling then it is chinless. Green things are telling. If Carlyle is noachian and Carlyle is telling then Carlyle is chinless. If Carlyle is chinless and Carlyle is inherent then Carlyle is ideal. Carlyle is noachian.", "logic": "\nTerse(carlyle)\nChinless(carlyle)\nTerse(courtenay)\nChinless(courtenay)\nInherent(courtenay)\nIdeal(courtenay)\nNoachian(courtenay)\nTelling(courtenay)\nViolated(peter)\nTerse(peter)\nChinless(peter)\nInherent(peter)\nIdeal(peter)\nNoachian(peter)\nTelling(peter)\nforall x (Chinless(x) -> Noachian(x))\nTerse(carlyle) and Noachian(carlyle) -> Violated(carlyle)\nforall x (Violated(x) -> Ideal(x))\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Telling(x))\nforall x (Inherent(x) and Telling(x) -> Chinless(x))\nforall x (Chinless(x) -> Telling(x))\nNoachian(carlyle) and Telling(carlyle) -> Chinless(carlyle)\nChinless(carlyle) and Inherent(carlyle) -> Ideal(carlyle)\n\nNoachian(carlyle)\n\nChinless(carlyle) and forall x (Chinless(x) -> Noachian(x)) -> therefore Noachian(carlyle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Mathilde is softening. Mathilde is extraneous. Colin is softening. Colin is extraneous. Colin is brainy. Colin is acrobatic. Colin is nescient. Colin is striped. Herve is xxvi. Herve is softening. Herve is extraneous. Herve is brainy. Herve is acrobatic. Herve is nescient. Herve is striped. If something is extraneous then it is nescient. If Mathilde is softening and Mathilde is nescient then Mathilde is xxvi. All xxvi things are acrobatic. All acrobatic things are striped. If something is brainy and striped then it is extraneous. Green things are striped. If Mathilde is nescient and Mathilde is striped then Mathilde is extraneous. If Mathilde is extraneous and Mathilde is brainy then Mathilde is acrobatic. Mathilde is not striped.", "logic": "\nSoftening(mathilde)\nExtraneous(mathilde)\nSoftening(colin)\nExtraneous(colin)\nBrainy(colin)\nAcrobatic(colin)\nNescient(colin)\nStriped(colin)\nXxvi(herve)\nSoftening(herve)\nExtraneous(herve)\nBrainy(herve)\nAcrobatic(herve)\nNescient(herve)\nStriped(herve)\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Nescient(x))\nSoftening(mathilde) and Nescient(mathilde) -> Xxvi(mathilde)\nforall x (Xxvi(x) -> Acrobatic(x))\nforall x (Acrobatic(x) -> Striped(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) and Striped(x) -> Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Striped(x))\nNescient(mathilde) and Striped(mathilde) -> Extraneous(mathilde)\nExtraneous(mathilde) and Brainy(mathilde) -> Acrobatic(mathilde)\n\nnot Striped(mathilde)\n\nExtraneous(mathilde) and forall x (Extraneous(x) -> Striped(x)) -> therefore Striped(mathilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Tobie is parentless. Tobie is pycnotic. Karylin is parentless. Karylin is pycnotic. Karylin is underfed. Karylin is collegiate. Karylin is heartless. Karylin is bullocky. Camile is estranged. Camile is parentless. Camile is pycnotic. Camile is underfed. Camile is collegiate. Camile is heartless. Camile is bullocky. If something is pycnotic then it is heartless. If Tobie is parentless and Tobie is heartless then Tobie is estranged. All estranged things are collegiate. All collegiate things are bullocky. If something is underfed and bullocky then it is pycnotic. Green things are bullocky. If Tobie is heartless and Tobie is bullocky then Tobie is pycnotic. If Tobie is pycnotic and Tobie is underfed then Tobie is collegiate. Tobie is estranged.", "logic": "\nParentless(tobie)\nPycnotic(tobie)\nParentless(karylin)\nPycnotic(karylin)\nUnderfed(karylin)\nCollegiate(karylin)\nHeartless(karylin)\nBullocky(karylin)\nEstranged(camile)\nParentless(camile)\nPycnotic(camile)\nUnderfed(camile)\nCollegiate(camile)\nHeartless(camile)\nBullocky(camile)\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Heartless(x))\nParentless(tobie) and Heartless(tobie) -> Estranged(tobie)\nforall x (Estranged(x) -> Collegiate(x))\nforall x (Collegiate(x) -> Bullocky(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) and Bullocky(x) -> Pycnotic(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Bullocky(x))\nHeartless(tobie) and Bullocky(tobie) -> Pycnotic(tobie)\nPycnotic(tobie) and Underfed(tobie) -> Collegiate(tobie)\n\nEstranged(tobie)\n\nPycnotic(tobie) and forall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Heartless(x)) -> therefore Heartless(tobie) Parentless(tobie) and Heartless(tobie) and Parentless(tobie) and Heartless(tobie) -> Estranged(tobie) -> therefore Estranged(tobie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Gwendolin is monitory. Gwendolin is celebrated. Amadeus is monitory. Amadeus is celebrated. Amadeus is curable. Amadeus is debased. Amadeus is mensural. Amadeus is fragmental. Monah is apodeictic. Monah is monitory. Monah is celebrated. Monah is curable. Monah is debased. Monah is mensural. Monah is fragmental. If something is celebrated then it is mensural. If Gwendolin is monitory and Gwendolin is mensural then Gwendolin is apodeictic. All apodeictic things are debased. All debased things are fragmental. If something is curable and fragmental then it is celebrated. Green things are fragmental. If Gwendolin is mensural and Gwendolin is fragmental then Gwendolin is celebrated. If Gwendolin is celebrated and Gwendolin is curable then Gwendolin is debased. Gwendolin is not apodeictic.", "logic": "\nMonitory(gwendolin)\nCelebrated(gwendolin)\nMonitory(amadeus)\nCelebrated(amadeus)\nCurable(amadeus)\nDebased(amadeus)\nMensural(amadeus)\nFragmental(amadeus)\nApodeictic(monah)\nMonitory(monah)\nCelebrated(monah)\nCurable(monah)\nDebased(monah)\nMensural(monah)\nFragmental(monah)\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Mensural(x))\nMonitory(gwendolin) and Mensural(gwendolin) -> Apodeictic(gwendolin)\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Debased(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Curable(x) and Fragmental(x) -> Celebrated(x))\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nMensural(gwendolin) and Fragmental(gwendolin) -> Celebrated(gwendolin)\nCelebrated(gwendolin) and Curable(gwendolin) -> Debased(gwendolin)\n\nnot Apodeictic(gwendolin)\n\nCelebrated(gwendolin) and forall x (Celebrated(x) -> Mensural(x)) -> therefore Mensural(gwendolin) Monitory(gwendolin) and Mensural(gwendolin) and Monitory(gwendolin) and Mensural(gwendolin) -> Apodeictic(gwendolin) -> therefore Apodeictic(gwendolin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Ciel is tidy. Ciel is dustlike. Niall is tidy. Niall is dustlike. Niall is integral. Niall is luscious. Niall is hangdog. Niall is staggering. Odysseus is jangling. Odysseus is tidy. Odysseus is dustlike. Odysseus is integral. Odysseus is luscious. Odysseus is hangdog. Odysseus is staggering. If something is dustlike then it is hangdog. If Ciel is tidy and Ciel is hangdog then Ciel is jangling. All jangling things are luscious. All luscious things are staggering. If something is integral and staggering then it is dustlike. Green things are staggering. If Ciel is hangdog and Ciel is staggering then Ciel is dustlike. If Ciel is dustlike and Ciel is integral then Ciel is luscious. Niall is not jangling.", "logic": "\nTidy(ciel)\nDustlike(ciel)\nTidy(niall)\nDustlike(niall)\nIntegral(niall)\nLuscious(niall)\nHangdog(niall)\nStaggering(niall)\nJangling(odysseus)\nTidy(odysseus)\nDustlike(odysseus)\nIntegral(odysseus)\nLuscious(odysseus)\nHangdog(odysseus)\nStaggering(odysseus)\nforall x (Dustlike(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nTidy(ciel) and Hangdog(ciel) -> Jangling(ciel)\nforall x (Jangling(x) -> Luscious(x))\nforall x (Luscious(x) -> Staggering(x))\nforall x (Integral(x) and Staggering(x) -> Dustlike(x))\nforall x (Dustlike(x) -> Staggering(x))\nHangdog(ciel) and Staggering(ciel) -> Dustlike(ciel)\nDustlike(ciel) and Integral(ciel) -> Luscious(ciel)\n\nnot Jangling(niall)\n\nnot Jangling(niall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Cybill is specified. Cybill is sleeveless. Alejandra is specified. Alejandra is sleeveless. Alejandra is masked. Alejandra is undated. Alejandra is unmeasured. Alejandra is polemic. Ansell is thickened. Ansell is specified. Ansell is sleeveless. Ansell is masked. Ansell is undated. Ansell is unmeasured. Ansell is polemic. If something is sleeveless then it is unmeasured. If Cybill is specified and Cybill is unmeasured then Cybill is thickened. All thickened things are undated. All undated things are polemic. If something is masked and polemic then it is sleeveless. Green things are polemic. If Cybill is unmeasured and Cybill is polemic then Cybill is sleeveless. If Cybill is sleeveless and Cybill is masked then Cybill is undated. Cybill is masked.", "logic": "\nSpecified(cybill)\nSleeveless(cybill)\nSpecified(alejandra)\nSleeveless(alejandra)\nMasked(alejandra)\nUndated(alejandra)\nUnmeasured(alejandra)\nPolemic(alejandra)\nThickened(ansell)\nSpecified(ansell)\nSleeveless(ansell)\nMasked(ansell)\nUndated(ansell)\nUnmeasured(ansell)\nPolemic(ansell)\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Unmeasured(x))\nSpecified(cybill) and Unmeasured(cybill) -> Thickened(cybill)\nforall x (Thickened(x) -> Undated(x))\nforall x (Undated(x) -> Polemic(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) and Polemic(x) -> Sleeveless(x))\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) -> Polemic(x))\nUnmeasured(cybill) and Polemic(cybill) -> Sleeveless(cybill)\nSleeveless(cybill) and Masked(cybill) -> Undated(cybill)\n\nMasked(cybill)\n\nMasked(cybill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1883"} {"premises": "Elspeth is not bimestrial. Elspeth is autoerotic. Elspeth is mislabeled. Millisent is ossicular. Millisent is tenor. Millisent is bimestrial. Millisent is unrecorded. Marlo is autoerotic. Marlo is unrecorded. Marlo is benign. If something is unrecorded and bimestrial then it is autoerotic. Nice things are ossicular. If something is benign then it is tenor. Cold, benign things are tenor. If something is mislabeled then it is tenor. Furry things are benign. If something is ossicular and not autoerotic then it is benign. If Marlo is tenor then Marlo is mislabeled. Millisent is bimestrial.", "logic": "\nnot Bimestrial(elspeth)\nAutoerotic(elspeth)\nMislabeled(elspeth)\nOssicular(millisent)\nTenor(millisent)\nBimestrial(millisent)\nUnrecorded(millisent)\nAutoerotic(marlo)\nUnrecorded(marlo)\nBenign(marlo)\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) and Bimestrial(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Ossicular(x))\nforall x (Benign(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) and Benign(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Benign(x))\nforall x (Ossicular(x) and not Autoerotic(x) -> Benign(x))\nTenor(marlo) -> Mislabeled(marlo)\n\nBimestrial(millisent)\n\ntherefore Bimestrial(millisent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Tomi is not embattled. Tomi is savage. Tomi is prefab. Annnora is undraped. Annnora is bronzed. Annnora is embattled. Annnora is bubaline. Lewis is savage. Lewis is bubaline. Lewis is forbidding. If something is bubaline and embattled then it is savage. Nice things are undraped. If something is forbidding then it is bronzed. Cold, forbidding things are bronzed. If something is prefab then it is bronzed. Furry things are forbidding. If something is undraped and not savage then it is forbidding. If Lewis is bronzed then Lewis is prefab. Tomi is not savage.", "logic": "\nnot Embattled(tomi)\nSavage(tomi)\nPrefab(tomi)\nUndraped(annnora)\nBronzed(annnora)\nEmbattled(annnora)\nBubaline(annnora)\nSavage(lewis)\nBubaline(lewis)\nForbidding(lewis)\nforall x (Bubaline(x) and Embattled(x) -> Savage(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) and Forbidding(x) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Bronzed(x))\nforall x (Savage(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Undraped(x) and not Savage(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nBronzed(lewis) -> Prefab(lewis)\n\nnot Savage(tomi)\n\ntherefore Savage(tomi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Augustus is not dismaying. Augustus is tilted. Augustus is salving. Les is explosive. Les is lean. Les is dismaying. Les is choosy. Antonia is tilted. Antonia is choosy. Antonia is dioecious. If something is choosy and dismaying then it is tilted. Nice things are explosive. If something is dioecious then it is lean. Cold, dioecious things are lean. If something is salving then it is lean. Furry things are dioecious. If something is explosive and not tilted then it is dioecious. If Antonia is lean then Antonia is salving. Antonia is lean.", "logic": "\nnot Dismaying(augustus)\nTilted(augustus)\nSalving(augustus)\nExplosive(les)\nLean(les)\nDismaying(les)\nChoosy(les)\nTilted(antonia)\nChoosy(antonia)\nDioecious(antonia)\nforall x (Choosy(x) and Dismaying(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Explosive(x))\nforall x (Dioecious(x) -> Lean(x))\nforall x (Dismaying(x) and Dioecious(x) -> Lean(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Lean(x))\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Explosive(x) and not Tilted(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nLean(antonia) -> Salving(antonia)\n\nLean(antonia)\n\nDioecious(antonia) and forall x (Dioecious(x) -> Lean(x)) -> therefore Lean(antonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Miles is not antinomian. Miles is beta. Miles is morose. Fern is thrown. Fern is valuable. Fern is antinomian. Fern is waxy. Karlene is beta. Karlene is waxy. Karlene is south. If something is waxy and antinomian then it is beta. Nice things are thrown. If something is south then it is valuable. Cold, south things are valuable. If something is morose then it is valuable. Furry things are south. If something is thrown and not beta then it is south. If Karlene is valuable then Karlene is morose. Miles is not valuable.", "logic": "\nnot Antinomian(miles)\nBeta(miles)\nMorose(miles)\nThrown(fern)\nValuable(fern)\nAntinomian(fern)\nWaxy(fern)\nBeta(karlene)\nWaxy(karlene)\nSouth(karlene)\nforall x (Waxy(x) and Antinomian(x) -> Beta(x))\nforall x (Morose(x) -> Thrown(x))\nforall x (South(x) -> Valuable(x))\nforall x (Antinomian(x) and South(x) -> Valuable(x))\nforall x (Morose(x) -> Valuable(x))\nforall x (Beta(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (Thrown(x) and not Beta(x) -> South(x))\nValuable(karlene) -> Morose(karlene)\n\nnot Valuable(miles)\n\nMorose(miles) and forall x (Morose(x) -> Valuable(x)) -> therefore Valuable(miles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Alla is not gelid. Alla is approving. Alla is fencelike. Ema is archducal. Ema is endogenous. Ema is gelid. Ema is fiducial. Elwyn is approving. Elwyn is fiducial. Elwyn is autoimmune. If something is fiducial and gelid then it is approving. Nice things are archducal. If something is autoimmune then it is endogenous. Cold, autoimmune things are endogenous. If something is fencelike then it is endogenous. Furry things are autoimmune. If something is archducal and not approving then it is autoimmune. If Elwyn is endogenous then Elwyn is fencelike. Elwyn is fencelike.", "logic": "\nnot Gelid(alla)\nApproving(alla)\nFencelike(alla)\nArchducal(ema)\nEndogenous(ema)\nGelid(ema)\nFiducial(ema)\nApproving(elwyn)\nFiducial(elwyn)\nAutoimmune(elwyn)\nforall x (Fiducial(x) and Gelid(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Fencelike(x) -> Archducal(x))\nforall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Gelid(x) and Autoimmune(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Fencelike(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Approving(x) -> Autoimmune(x))\nforall x (Archducal(x) and not Approving(x) -> Autoimmune(x))\nEndogenous(elwyn) -> Fencelike(elwyn)\n\nFencelike(elwyn)\n\nAutoimmune(elwyn) and forall x (Autoimmune(x) -> Endogenous(x)) -> therefore Endogenous(elwyn) Endogenous(elwyn) and Endogenous(elwyn) -> Fencelike(elwyn) -> therefore Fencelike(elwyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Bridie is not compatible. Bridie is polyhedral. Bridie is unopposed. Kaster is flagrant. Kaster is removed. Kaster is compatible. Kaster is surrogate. Franni is polyhedral. Franni is surrogate. Franni is zairese. If something is surrogate and compatible then it is polyhedral. Nice things are flagrant. If something is zairese then it is removed. Cold, zairese things are removed. If something is unopposed then it is removed. Furry things are zairese. If something is flagrant and not polyhedral then it is zairese. If Franni is removed then Franni is unopposed. Kaster is not zairese.", "logic": "\nnot Compatible(bridie)\nPolyhedral(bridie)\nUnopposed(bridie)\nFlagrant(kaster)\nRemoved(kaster)\nCompatible(kaster)\nSurrogate(kaster)\nPolyhedral(franni)\nSurrogate(franni)\nZairese(franni)\nforall x (Surrogate(x) and Compatible(x) -> Polyhedral(x))\nforall x (Unopposed(x) -> Flagrant(x))\nforall x (Zairese(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Compatible(x) and Zairese(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Unopposed(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Zairese(x))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) and not Polyhedral(x) -> Zairese(x))\nRemoved(franni) -> Unopposed(franni)\n\nnot Zairese(kaster)\n\nSurrogate(kaster) and Compatible(kaster) and forall x (Surrogate(x) and Compatible(x) -> Polyhedral(x)) -> therefore Polyhedral(kaster) Polyhedral(kaster) and forall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Zairese(x)) -> therefore Zairese(kaster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Taffy is not hypnogogic. Taffy is unseamed. Taffy is sugared. Aeriel is persian. Aeriel is agonadal. Aeriel is hypnogogic. Aeriel is dissoluble. Nadiya is unseamed. Nadiya is dissoluble. Nadiya is pokey. If something is dissoluble and hypnogogic then it is unseamed. Nice things are persian. If something is pokey then it is agonadal. Cold, pokey things are agonadal. If something is sugared then it is agonadal. Furry things are pokey. If something is persian and not unseamed then it is pokey. If Nadiya is agonadal then Nadiya is sugared. Nadiya is persian.", "logic": "\nnot Hypnogogic(taffy)\nUnseamed(taffy)\nSugared(taffy)\nPersian(aeriel)\nAgonadal(aeriel)\nHypnogogic(aeriel)\nDissoluble(aeriel)\nUnseamed(nadiya)\nDissoluble(nadiya)\nPokey(nadiya)\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) and Hypnogogic(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Sugared(x) -> Persian(x))\nforall x (Pokey(x) -> Agonadal(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Pokey(x) -> Agonadal(x))\nforall x (Sugared(x) -> Agonadal(x))\nforall x (Unseamed(x) -> Pokey(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) and not Unseamed(x) -> Pokey(x))\nAgonadal(nadiya) -> Sugared(nadiya)\n\nPersian(nadiya)\n\nPokey(nadiya) and forall x (Pokey(x) -> Agonadal(x)) -> therefore Agonadal(nadiya) Agonadal(nadiya) and Agonadal(nadiya) -> Sugared(nadiya) -> therefore Sugared(nadiya) Sugared(nadiya) and forall x (Sugared(x) -> Persian(x)) -> therefore Persian(nadiya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Sybil is not macro. Sybil is couthy. Sybil is beatific. Theodosia is nonnative. Theodosia is taiwanese. Theodosia is macro. Theodosia is hatless. Pammi is couthy. Pammi is hatless. Pammi is cumbrous. If something is hatless and macro then it is couthy. Nice things are nonnative. If something is cumbrous then it is taiwanese. Cold, cumbrous things are taiwanese. If something is beatific then it is taiwanese. Furry things are cumbrous. If something is nonnative and not couthy then it is cumbrous. If Pammi is taiwanese then Pammi is beatific. Pammi is not nonnative.", "logic": "\nnot Macro(sybil)\nCouthy(sybil)\nBeatific(sybil)\nNonnative(theodosia)\nTaiwanese(theodosia)\nMacro(theodosia)\nHatless(theodosia)\nCouthy(pammi)\nHatless(pammi)\nCumbrous(pammi)\nforall x (Hatless(x) and Macro(x) -> Couthy(x))\nforall x (Beatific(x) -> Nonnative(x))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nforall x (Macro(x) and Cumbrous(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nforall x (Beatific(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nforall x (Couthy(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nforall x (Nonnative(x) and not Couthy(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\nTaiwanese(pammi) -> Beatific(pammi)\n\nnot Nonnative(pammi)\n\nCumbrous(pammi) and forall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Taiwanese(x)) -> therefore Taiwanese(pammi) Taiwanese(pammi) and Taiwanese(pammi) -> Beatific(pammi) -> therefore Beatific(pammi) Beatific(pammi) and forall x (Beatific(x) -> Nonnative(x)) -> therefore Nonnative(pammi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Darleen is not unaltered. Darleen is surd. Darleen is tempered. Fran is uterine. Fran is terete. Fran is unaltered. Fran is modernized. Jessamyn is surd. Jessamyn is modernized. Jessamyn is monogynous. If something is modernized and unaltered then it is surd. Nice things are uterine. If something is monogynous then it is terete. Cold, monogynous things are terete. If something is tempered then it is terete. Furry things are monogynous. If something is uterine and not surd then it is monogynous. If Jessamyn is terete then Jessamyn is tempered. Darleen is not modernized.", "logic": "\nnot Unaltered(darleen)\nSurd(darleen)\nTempered(darleen)\nUterine(fran)\nTerete(fran)\nUnaltered(fran)\nModernized(fran)\nSurd(jessamyn)\nModernized(jessamyn)\nMonogynous(jessamyn)\nforall x (Modernized(x) and Unaltered(x) -> Surd(x))\nforall x (Tempered(x) -> Uterine(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) -> Terete(x))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) and Monogynous(x) -> Terete(x))\nforall x (Tempered(x) -> Terete(x))\nforall x (Surd(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nforall x (Uterine(x) and not Surd(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nTerete(jessamyn) -> Tempered(jessamyn)\n\nnot Modernized(darleen)\n\nnot Modernized(darleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "Diamond is not vulpecular. Diamond is crowing. Diamond is childless. Schuyler is popliteal. Schuyler is pictured. Schuyler is vulpecular. Schuyler is sterile. Quintana is crowing. Quintana is sterile. Quintana is medullary. If something is sterile and vulpecular then it is crowing. Nice things are popliteal. If something is medullary then it is pictured. Cold, medullary things are pictured. If something is childless then it is pictured. Furry things are medullary. If something is popliteal and not crowing then it is medullary. If Quintana is pictured then Quintana is childless. Quintana is vulpecular.", "logic": "\nnot Vulpecular(diamond)\nCrowing(diamond)\nChildless(diamond)\nPopliteal(schuyler)\nPictured(schuyler)\nVulpecular(schuyler)\nSterile(schuyler)\nCrowing(quintana)\nSterile(quintana)\nMedullary(quintana)\nforall x (Sterile(x) and Vulpecular(x) -> Crowing(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Popliteal(x))\nforall x (Medullary(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Vulpecular(x) and Medullary(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Childless(x) -> Pictured(x))\nforall x (Crowing(x) -> Medullary(x))\nforall x (Popliteal(x) and not Crowing(x) -> Medullary(x))\nPictured(quintana) -> Childless(quintana)\n\nVulpecular(quintana)\n\nVulpecular(quintana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-585"} {"premises": "The raven anodise the leanne. The lenny is greedy. The leanne anodise the lenny. The sandi taint the lenny. If someone anodise the lenny then they are gracile. If someone skimp the lenny and they are gracile then they like the sandi. If someone taint the raven then they see the raven. If someone taint the leanne and the leanne taint the lenny then the leanne taint the sandi. If someone taint the leanne and they see the raven then they are greedy. If someone is missing then they see the lenny. If someone is cherished then they need the raven. If someone taint the lenny then they are cherished. The leanne anodise the lenny.", "logic": "\nAnodise(raven, leanne)\nGreedy(lenny)\nAnodise(leanne, lenny)\nTaint(sandi, lenny)\nforall x (Anodise(x, lenny) -> Gracile(x))\nforall x (Skimp(x, lenny) and Gracile(x) -> Skimp(x, sandi))\nforall x (Taint(x, raven) -> Anodise(x, raven))\nforall x (Taint(x, leanne) and Taint(leanne, lenny) -> Taint(leanne, sandi))\nforall x (Taint(x, leanne) and Anodise(x, raven) -> Greedy(x))\nforall x (Missing(x) -> Anodise(x, lenny))\nforall x (Cherished(x) -> Taint(x, raven))\nforall x (Taint(x, lenny) -> Cherished(x))\n\nAnodise(leanne, lenny)\n\ntherefore Anodise(leanne, lenny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The zolly pore the susette. The lorrie is bregmatic. The susette pore the lorrie. The katharyn appease the lorrie. If someone pore the lorrie then they are begotten. If someone ruin the lorrie and they are begotten then they like the katharyn. If someone appease the zolly then they see the zolly. If someone appease the susette and the susette appease the lorrie then the susette appease the katharyn. If someone appease the susette and they see the zolly then they are bregmatic. If someone is racemose then they see the lorrie. If someone is tailored then they need the zolly. If someone appease the lorrie then they are tailored. The lorrie is not bregmatic.", "logic": "\nPore(zolly, susette)\nBregmatic(lorrie)\nPore(susette, lorrie)\nAppease(katharyn, lorrie)\nforall x (Pore(x, lorrie) -> Begotten(x))\nforall x (Ruin(x, lorrie) and Begotten(x) -> Ruin(x, katharyn))\nforall x (Appease(x, zolly) -> Pore(x, zolly))\nforall x (Appease(x, susette) and Appease(susette, lorrie) -> Appease(susette, katharyn))\nforall x (Appease(x, susette) and Pore(x, zolly) -> Bregmatic(x))\nforall x (Racemose(x) -> Pore(x, lorrie))\nforall x (Tailored(x) -> Appease(x, zolly))\nforall x (Appease(x, lorrie) -> Tailored(x))\n\nnot Bregmatic(lorrie)\n\ntherefore Bregmatic(lorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The tandi barrel the windy. The elfreda is molar. The windy barrel the elfreda. The zitella route the elfreda. If someone barrel the elfreda then they are strung. If someone cage the elfreda and they are strung then they like the zitella. If someone route the tandi then they see the tandi. If someone route the windy and the windy route the elfreda then the windy route the zitella. If someone route the windy and they see the tandi then they are molar. If someone is corrigible then they see the elfreda. If someone is postictal then they need the tandi. If someone route the elfreda then they are postictal. The windy is strung.", "logic": "\nBarrel(tandi, windy)\nMolar(elfreda)\nBarrel(windy, elfreda)\nRoute(zitella, elfreda)\nforall x (Barrel(x, elfreda) -> Strung(x))\nforall x (Cage(x, elfreda) and Strung(x) -> Cage(x, zitella))\nforall x (Route(x, tandi) -> Barrel(x, tandi))\nforall x (Route(x, windy) and Route(windy, elfreda) -> Route(windy, zitella))\nforall x (Route(x, windy) and Barrel(x, tandi) -> Molar(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) -> Barrel(x, elfreda))\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Route(x, tandi))\nforall x (Route(x, elfreda) -> Postictal(x))\n\nStrung(windy)\n\nBarrel(windy, elfreda) and forall x (Barrel(x, elfreda) -> Strung(x)) -> therefore Strung(windy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The bradley digitalize the marlyn. The jillie is carboxyl. The marlyn digitalize the jillie. The denni hang the jillie. If someone digitalize the jillie then they are alular. If someone forbear the jillie and they are alular then they like the denni. If someone hang the bradley then they see the bradley. If someone hang the marlyn and the marlyn hang the jillie then the marlyn hang the denni. If someone hang the marlyn and they see the bradley then they are carboxyl. If someone is untired then they see the jillie. If someone is etched then they need the bradley. If someone hang the jillie then they are etched. The marlyn is not alular.", "logic": "\nDigitalize(bradley, marlyn)\nCarboxyl(jillie)\nDigitalize(marlyn, jillie)\nHang(denni, jillie)\nforall x (Digitalize(x, jillie) -> Alular(x))\nforall x (Forbear(x, jillie) and Alular(x) -> Forbear(x, denni))\nforall x (Hang(x, bradley) -> Digitalize(x, bradley))\nforall x (Hang(x, marlyn) and Hang(marlyn, jillie) -> Hang(marlyn, denni))\nforall x (Hang(x, marlyn) and Digitalize(x, bradley) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Untired(x) -> Digitalize(x, jillie))\nforall x (Etched(x) -> Hang(x, bradley))\nforall x (Hang(x, jillie) -> Etched(x))\n\nnot Alular(marlyn)\n\nDigitalize(marlyn, jillie) and forall x (Digitalize(x, jillie) -> Alular(x)) -> therefore Alular(marlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The netty improve the mair. The belita is conversant. The mair improve the belita. The pavla persuade the belita. If someone improve the belita then they are papery. If someone begin the belita and they are papery then they like the pavla. If someone persuade the netty then they see the netty. If someone persuade the mair and the mair persuade the belita then the mair persuade the pavla. If someone persuade the mair and they see the netty then they are conversant. If someone is crookback then they see the belita. If someone is unbeknown then they need the netty. If someone persuade the belita then they are unbeknown. The pavla persuade the netty.", "logic": "\nImprove(netty, mair)\nConversant(belita)\nImprove(mair, belita)\nPersuade(pavla, belita)\nforall x (Improve(x, belita) -> Papery(x))\nforall x (Begin(x, belita) and Papery(x) -> Begin(x, pavla))\nforall x (Persuade(x, netty) -> Improve(x, netty))\nforall x (Persuade(x, mair) and Persuade(mair, belita) -> Persuade(mair, pavla))\nforall x (Persuade(x, mair) and Improve(x, netty) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Improve(x, belita))\nforall x (Unbeknown(x) -> Persuade(x, netty))\nforall x (Persuade(x, belita) -> Unbeknown(x))\n\nPersuade(pavla, netty)\n\nPersuade(pavla, belita) and forall x (Persuade(x, belita) -> Unbeknown(x)) -> therefore Unbeknown(pavla) Unbeknown(pavla) and forall x (Unbeknown(x) -> Persuade(x, netty)) -> therefore Persuade(pavla, netty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The alysia corrode the genvieve. The ranice is carmelite. The genvieve corrode the ranice. The haskel radio the ranice. If someone corrode the ranice then they are sarcastic. If someone refill the ranice and they are sarcastic then they like the haskel. If someone radio the alysia then they see the alysia. If someone radio the genvieve and the genvieve radio the ranice then the genvieve radio the haskel. If someone radio the genvieve and they see the alysia then they are carmelite. If someone is hypnotized then they see the ranice. If someone is bearable then they need the alysia. If someone radio the ranice then they are bearable. The haskel does not need the alysia.", "logic": "\nCorrode(alysia, genvieve)\nCarmelite(ranice)\nCorrode(genvieve, ranice)\nRadio(haskel, ranice)\nforall x (Corrode(x, ranice) -> Sarcastic(x))\nforall x (Refill(x, ranice) and Sarcastic(x) -> Refill(x, haskel))\nforall x (Radio(x, alysia) -> Corrode(x, alysia))\nforall x (Radio(x, genvieve) and Radio(genvieve, ranice) -> Radio(genvieve, haskel))\nforall x (Radio(x, genvieve) and Corrode(x, alysia) -> Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Corrode(x, ranice))\nforall x (Bearable(x) -> Radio(x, alysia))\nforall x (Radio(x, ranice) -> Bearable(x))\n\nnot Radio(haskel, alysia)\n\nRadio(haskel, ranice) and forall x (Radio(x, ranice) -> Bearable(x)) -> therefore Bearable(haskel) Bearable(haskel) and forall x (Bearable(x) -> Radio(x, alysia)) -> therefore Radio(haskel, alysia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The todd apprentice the anastasie. The imogen is unstaged. The anastasie apprentice the imogen. The nerissa fizz the imogen. If someone apprentice the imogen then they are naturistic. If someone crumple the imogen and they are naturistic then they like the nerissa. If someone fizz the todd then they see the todd. If someone fizz the anastasie and the anastasie fizz the imogen then the anastasie fizz the nerissa. If someone fizz the anastasie and they see the todd then they are unstaged. If someone is overactive then they see the imogen. If someone is capable then they need the todd. If someone fizz the imogen then they are capable. The nerissa apprentice the todd.", "logic": "\nApprentice(todd, anastasie)\nUnstaged(imogen)\nApprentice(anastasie, imogen)\nFizz(nerissa, imogen)\nforall x (Apprentice(x, imogen) -> Naturistic(x))\nforall x (Crumple(x, imogen) and Naturistic(x) -> Crumple(x, nerissa))\nforall x (Fizz(x, todd) -> Apprentice(x, todd))\nforall x (Fizz(x, anastasie) and Fizz(anastasie, imogen) -> Fizz(anastasie, nerissa))\nforall x (Fizz(x, anastasie) and Apprentice(x, todd) -> Unstaged(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Apprentice(x, imogen))\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Fizz(x, todd))\nforall x (Fizz(x, imogen) -> Capable(x))\n\nApprentice(nerissa, todd)\n\nFizz(nerissa, imogen) and forall x (Fizz(x, imogen) -> Capable(x)) -> therefore Capable(nerissa) Capable(nerissa) and forall x (Capable(x) -> Fizz(x, todd)) -> therefore Fizz(nerissa, todd) Fizz(nerissa, todd) and forall x (Fizz(x, todd) -> Apprentice(x, todd)) -> therefore Apprentice(nerissa, todd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The tobit ranch the briney. The thomas is diadromous. The briney ranch the thomas. The queenie reply the thomas. If someone ranch the thomas then they are disgraced. If someone devilize the thomas and they are disgraced then they like the queenie. If someone reply the tobit then they see the tobit. If someone reply the briney and the briney reply the thomas then the briney reply the queenie. If someone reply the briney and they see the tobit then they are diadromous. If someone is varied then they see the thomas. If someone is deafening then they need the tobit. If someone reply the thomas then they are deafening. The queenie does not see the tobit.", "logic": "\nRanch(tobit, briney)\nDiadromous(thomas)\nRanch(briney, thomas)\nReply(queenie, thomas)\nforall x (Ranch(x, thomas) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Devilize(x, thomas) and Disgraced(x) -> Devilize(x, queenie))\nforall x (Reply(x, tobit) -> Ranch(x, tobit))\nforall x (Reply(x, briney) and Reply(briney, thomas) -> Reply(briney, queenie))\nforall x (Reply(x, briney) and Ranch(x, tobit) -> Diadromous(x))\nforall x (Varied(x) -> Ranch(x, thomas))\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Reply(x, tobit))\nforall x (Reply(x, thomas) -> Deafening(x))\n\nnot Ranch(queenie, tobit)\n\nReply(queenie, thomas) and forall x (Reply(x, thomas) -> Deafening(x)) -> therefore Deafening(queenie) Deafening(queenie) and forall x (Deafening(x) -> Reply(x, tobit)) -> therefore Reply(queenie, tobit) Reply(queenie, tobit) and forall x (Reply(x, tobit) -> Ranch(x, tobit)) -> therefore Ranch(queenie, tobit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The natala sever the birdie. The orelia is surd. The birdie sever the orelia. The misha preform the orelia. If someone sever the orelia then they are painterly. If someone rebel the orelia and they are painterly then they like the misha. If someone preform the natala then they see the natala. If someone preform the birdie and the birdie preform the orelia then the birdie preform the misha. If someone preform the birdie and they see the natala then they are surd. If someone is watered then they see the orelia. If someone is sandpapery then they need the natala. If someone preform the orelia then they are sandpapery. The natala does not like the misha.", "logic": "\nSever(natala, birdie)\nSurd(orelia)\nSever(birdie, orelia)\nPreform(misha, orelia)\nforall x (Sever(x, orelia) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Rebel(x, orelia) and Painterly(x) -> Rebel(x, misha))\nforall x (Preform(x, natala) -> Sever(x, natala))\nforall x (Preform(x, birdie) and Preform(birdie, orelia) -> Preform(birdie, misha))\nforall x (Preform(x, birdie) and Sever(x, natala) -> Surd(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) -> Sever(x, orelia))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Preform(x, natala))\nforall x (Preform(x, orelia) -> Sandpapery(x))\n\nnot Rebel(natala, misha)\n\nforall x (Rebel(x, orelia) and Painterly(x) -> Rebel(x, misha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The cherise swish the gavriel. The emmalyn is louvered. The gavriel swish the emmalyn. The nola duck the emmalyn. If someone swish the emmalyn then they are stillborn. If someone denigrate the emmalyn and they are stillborn then they like the nola. If someone duck the cherise then they see the cherise. If someone duck the gavriel and the gavriel duck the emmalyn then the gavriel duck the nola. If someone duck the gavriel and they see the cherise then they are louvered. If someone is aflame then they see the emmalyn. If someone is lowset then they need the cherise. If someone duck the emmalyn then they are lowset. The gavriel is lowset.", "logic": "\nSwish(cherise, gavriel)\nLouvered(emmalyn)\nSwish(gavriel, emmalyn)\nDuck(nola, emmalyn)\nforall x (Swish(x, emmalyn) -> Stillborn(x))\nforall x (Denigrate(x, emmalyn) and Stillborn(x) -> Denigrate(x, nola))\nforall x (Duck(x, cherise) -> Swish(x, cherise))\nforall x (Duck(x, gavriel) and Duck(gavriel, emmalyn) -> Duck(gavriel, nola))\nforall x (Duck(x, gavriel) and Swish(x, cherise) -> Louvered(x))\nforall x (Aflame(x) -> Swish(x, emmalyn))\nforall x (Lowset(x) -> Duck(x, cherise))\nforall x (Duck(x, emmalyn) -> Lowset(x))\n\nLowset(gavriel)\n\nforall x (Duck(x, emmalyn) -> Lowset(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The fortune thunder the caldwell. The tilda is captivated. The caldwell thunder the tilda. The shirlene spirt the tilda. If someone thunder the tilda then they are trochaic. If someone tiller the tilda and they are trochaic then they like the shirlene. If someone spirt the fortune then they see the fortune. If someone spirt the caldwell and the caldwell spirt the tilda then the caldwell spirt the shirlene. If someone spirt the caldwell and they see the fortune then they are captivated. If someone is hungry then they see the tilda. If someone is pilotless then they need the fortune. If someone spirt the tilda then they are pilotless. The shirlene does not like the shirlene.", "logic": "\nThunder(fortune, caldwell)\nCaptivated(tilda)\nThunder(caldwell, tilda)\nSpirt(shirlene, tilda)\nforall x (Thunder(x, tilda) -> Trochaic(x))\nforall x (Tiller(x, tilda) and Trochaic(x) -> Tiller(x, shirlene))\nforall x (Spirt(x, fortune) -> Thunder(x, fortune))\nforall x (Spirt(x, caldwell) and Spirt(caldwell, tilda) -> Spirt(caldwell, shirlene))\nforall x (Spirt(x, caldwell) and Thunder(x, fortune) -> Captivated(x))\nforall x (Hungry(x) -> Thunder(x, tilda))\nforall x (Pilotless(x) -> Spirt(x, fortune))\nforall x (Spirt(x, tilda) -> Pilotless(x))\n\nnot Tiller(shirlene, shirlene)\n\nforall x (Tiller(x, tilda) and Trochaic(x) -> Tiller(x, shirlene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The kaycee unfurl the griswold. The modesty is manichaean. The griswold unfurl the modesty. The sonya reecho the modesty. If someone unfurl the modesty then they are pregnant. If someone realign the modesty and they are pregnant then they like the sonya. If someone reecho the kaycee then they see the kaycee. If someone reecho the griswold and the griswold reecho the modesty then the griswold reecho the sonya. If someone reecho the griswold and they see the kaycee then they are manichaean. If someone is deathlike then they see the modesty. If someone is autonomous then they need the kaycee. If someone reecho the modesty then they are autonomous. The modesty unfurl the kaycee.", "logic": "\nUnfurl(kaycee, griswold)\nManichaean(modesty)\nUnfurl(griswold, modesty)\nReecho(sonya, modesty)\nforall x (Unfurl(x, modesty) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Realign(x, modesty) and Pregnant(x) -> Realign(x, sonya))\nforall x (Reecho(x, kaycee) -> Unfurl(x, kaycee))\nforall x (Reecho(x, griswold) and Reecho(griswold, modesty) -> Reecho(griswold, sonya))\nforall x (Reecho(x, griswold) and Unfurl(x, kaycee) -> Manichaean(x))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Unfurl(x, modesty))\nforall x (Autonomous(x) -> Reecho(x, kaycee))\nforall x (Reecho(x, modesty) -> Autonomous(x))\n\nUnfurl(modesty, kaycee)\n\nforall x (Reecho(x, kaycee) -> Unfurl(x, kaycee)) <- forall x (Autonomous(x) -> Reecho(x, kaycee)) <- forall x (Reecho(x, modesty) -> Autonomous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The stefa perpetuate the ossie. The wini is rubbery. The ossie perpetuate the wini. The caterina abort the wini. If someone perpetuate the wini then they are tinkling. If someone minimise the wini and they are tinkling then they like the caterina. If someone abort the stefa then they see the stefa. If someone abort the ossie and the ossie abort the wini then the ossie abort the caterina. If someone abort the ossie and they see the stefa then they are rubbery. If someone is underclass then they see the wini. If someone is disquieted then they need the stefa. If someone abort the wini then they are disquieted. The ossie does not like the ossie.", "logic": "\nPerpetuate(stefa, ossie)\nRubbery(wini)\nPerpetuate(ossie, wini)\nAbort(caterina, wini)\nforall x (Perpetuate(x, wini) -> Tinkling(x))\nforall x (Minimise(x, wini) and Tinkling(x) -> Minimise(x, caterina))\nforall x (Abort(x, stefa) -> Perpetuate(x, stefa))\nforall x (Abort(x, ossie) and Abort(ossie, wini) -> Abort(ossie, caterina))\nforall x (Abort(x, ossie) and Perpetuate(x, stefa) -> Rubbery(x))\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Perpetuate(x, wini))\nforall x (Disquieted(x) -> Abort(x, stefa))\nforall x (Abort(x, wini) -> Disquieted(x))\n\nnot Minimise(ossie, ossie)\n\nnot Minimise(ossie, ossie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The maxfield brighten the emilie. The wylie is devoted. The emilie brighten the wylie. The yelena trace the wylie. If someone brighten the wylie then they are mimetic. If someone brandmark the wylie and they are mimetic then they like the yelena. If someone trace the maxfield then they see the maxfield. If someone trace the emilie and the emilie trace the wylie then the emilie trace the yelena. If someone trace the emilie and they see the maxfield then they are devoted. If someone is westward then they see the wylie. If someone is peristylar then they need the maxfield. If someone trace the wylie then they are peristylar. The emilie is young.", "logic": "\nBrighten(maxfield, emilie)\nDevoted(wylie)\nBrighten(emilie, wylie)\nTrace(yelena, wylie)\nforall x (Brighten(x, wylie) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, wylie) and Mimetic(x) -> Brandmark(x, yelena))\nforall x (Trace(x, maxfield) -> Brighten(x, maxfield))\nforall x (Trace(x, emilie) and Trace(emilie, wylie) -> Trace(emilie, yelena))\nforall x (Trace(x, emilie) and Brighten(x, maxfield) -> Devoted(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) -> Brighten(x, wylie))\nforall x (Peristylar(x) -> Trace(x, maxfield))\nforall x (Trace(x, wylie) -> Peristylar(x))\n\nYoung(emilie)\n\nYoung(emilie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The gibb fudge the ramon. The malkah is benignant. The ramon fudge the malkah. The spence sibilate the malkah. If someone fudge the malkah then they are grating. If someone winter the malkah and they are grating then they like the spence. If someone sibilate the gibb then they see the gibb. If someone sibilate the ramon and the ramon sibilate the malkah then the ramon sibilate the spence. If someone sibilate the ramon and they see the gibb then they are benignant. If someone is chilean then they see the malkah. If someone is west then they need the gibb. If someone sibilate the malkah then they are west. The spence does not like the malkah.", "logic": "\nFudge(gibb, ramon)\nBenignant(malkah)\nFudge(ramon, malkah)\nSibilate(spence, malkah)\nforall x (Fudge(x, malkah) -> Grating(x))\nforall x (Winter(x, malkah) and Grating(x) -> Winter(x, spence))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, gibb) -> Fudge(x, gibb))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, ramon) and Sibilate(ramon, malkah) -> Sibilate(ramon, spence))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, ramon) and Fudge(x, gibb) -> Benignant(x))\nforall x (Chilean(x) -> Fudge(x, malkah))\nforall x (West(x) -> Sibilate(x, gibb))\nforall x (Sibilate(x, malkah) -> West(x))\n\nnot Winter(spence, malkah)\n\nnot Winter(spence, malkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "The barbi rough the france. The jerrylee is subdural. The france rough the jerrylee. The tiffany ingratiate the jerrylee. If someone rough the jerrylee then they are frenetic. If someone behead the jerrylee and they are frenetic then they like the tiffany. If someone ingratiate the barbi then they see the barbi. If someone ingratiate the france and the france ingratiate the jerrylee then the france ingratiate the tiffany. If someone ingratiate the france and they see the barbi then they are subdural. If someone is rank then they see the jerrylee. If someone is elaborated then they need the barbi. If someone ingratiate the jerrylee then they are elaborated. The france is rank.", "logic": "\nRough(barbi, france)\nSubdural(jerrylee)\nRough(france, jerrylee)\nIngratiate(tiffany, jerrylee)\nforall x (Rough(x, jerrylee) -> Frenetic(x))\nforall x (Behead(x, jerrylee) and Frenetic(x) -> Behead(x, tiffany))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, barbi) -> Rough(x, barbi))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, france) and Ingratiate(france, jerrylee) -> Ingratiate(france, tiffany))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, france) and Rough(x, barbi) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Rough(x, jerrylee))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Ingratiate(x, barbi))\nforall x (Ingratiate(x, jerrylee) -> Elaborated(x))\n\nRank(france)\n\nRank(france) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-40"} {"premises": "Tami is alight. Tami is roasted. Fayina is fencelike. Euclid is designed. Euclid is unawakened. Euclid is minacious. Eliot is minacious. Smart things are designed. All unawakened things are minacious. Round, fencelike things are alight. If Eliot is indisposed then Eliot is roasted. Smart things are designed. All minacious, designed things are indisposed. Euclid is unawakened.", "logic": "\nAlight(tami)\nRoasted(tami)\nFencelike(fayina)\nDesigned(euclid)\nUnawakened(euclid)\nMinacious(euclid)\nMinacious(eliot)\nforall x (Minacious(x) -> Designed(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Minacious(x))\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and Fencelike(x) -> Alight(x))\nIndisposed(eliot) -> Roasted(eliot)\nforall x (Minacious(x) -> Designed(x))\nforall x (Minacious(x) and Designed(x) -> Indisposed(x))\n\nUnawakened(euclid)\n\ntherefore Unawakened(euclid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Eugenie is variform. Eugenie is dishonest. Annie is weak. Bel is bipartisan. Bel is triple. Bel is oversexed. Tye is oversexed. Smart things are bipartisan. All triple things are oversexed. Round, weak things are variform. If Tye is variant then Tye is dishonest. Smart things are bipartisan. All oversexed, bipartisan things are variant. Eugenie is not variform.", "logic": "\nVariform(eugenie)\nDishonest(eugenie)\nWeak(annie)\nBipartisan(bel)\nTriple(bel)\nOversexed(bel)\nOversexed(tye)\nforall x (Oversexed(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Triple(x) -> Oversexed(x))\nforall x (Variant(x) and Weak(x) -> Variform(x))\nVariant(tye) -> Dishonest(tye)\nforall x (Oversexed(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Oversexed(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Variant(x))\n\nnot Variform(eugenie)\n\ntherefore Variform(eugenie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Daisi is vertebrate. Daisi is unfattened. Boniface is unlikely. Hilliary is catalectic. Hilliary is stunned. Hilliary is cannular. Adora is cannular. Smart things are catalectic. All stunned things are cannular. Round, unlikely things are vertebrate. If Adora is motional then Adora is unfattened. Smart things are catalectic. All cannular, catalectic things are motional. Hilliary is motional.", "logic": "\nVertebrate(daisi)\nUnfattened(daisi)\nUnlikely(boniface)\nCatalectic(hilliary)\nStunned(hilliary)\nCannular(hilliary)\nCannular(adora)\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Stunned(x) -> Cannular(x))\nforall x (Motional(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Vertebrate(x))\nMotional(adora) -> Unfattened(adora)\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Catalectic(x))\nforall x (Cannular(x) and Catalectic(x) -> Motional(x))\n\nMotional(hilliary)\n\nCannular(hilliary) and Catalectic(hilliary) and forall x (Cannular(x) and Catalectic(x) -> Motional(x)) -> therefore Motional(hilliary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Barnett is labile. Barnett is eurafrican. Virgilio is pouring. Shepard is caprine. Shepard is even. Shepard is profuse. Georgina is profuse. Smart things are caprine. All even things are profuse. Round, pouring things are labile. If Georgina is renowned then Georgina is eurafrican. Smart things are caprine. All profuse, caprine things are renowned. Georgina is not caprine.", "logic": "\nLabile(barnett)\nEurafrican(barnett)\nPouring(virgilio)\nCaprine(shepard)\nEven(shepard)\nProfuse(shepard)\nProfuse(georgina)\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Caprine(x))\nforall x (Even(x) -> Profuse(x))\nforall x (Renowned(x) and Pouring(x) -> Labile(x))\nRenowned(georgina) -> Eurafrican(georgina)\nforall x (Profuse(x) -> Caprine(x))\nforall x (Profuse(x) and Caprine(x) -> Renowned(x))\n\nnot Caprine(georgina)\n\nProfuse(georgina) and forall x (Profuse(x) -> Caprine(x)) -> therefore Caprine(georgina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Bonni is vitiated. Bonni is morbid. Hannah is oracular. Hertha is tentacled. Hertha is unfitting. Hertha is judaic. Olaf is judaic. Smart things are tentacled. All unfitting things are judaic. Round, oracular things are vitiated. If Olaf is geologic then Olaf is morbid. Smart things are tentacled. All judaic, tentacled things are geologic. Olaf is geologic.", "logic": "\nVitiated(bonni)\nMorbid(bonni)\nOracular(hannah)\nTentacled(hertha)\nUnfitting(hertha)\nJudaic(hertha)\nJudaic(olaf)\nforall x (Judaic(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Unfitting(x) -> Judaic(x))\nforall x (Geologic(x) and Oracular(x) -> Vitiated(x))\nGeologic(olaf) -> Morbid(olaf)\nforall x (Judaic(x) -> Tentacled(x))\nforall x (Judaic(x) and Tentacled(x) -> Geologic(x))\n\nGeologic(olaf)\n\nJudaic(olaf) and forall x (Judaic(x) -> Tentacled(x)) -> therefore Tentacled(olaf) Judaic(olaf) and Tentacled(olaf) and forall x (Judaic(x) and Tentacled(x) -> Geologic(x)) -> therefore Geologic(olaf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Alton is dewy. Alton is cinerary. Everett is eased. Ronny is bladed. Ronny is caesural. Ronny is deathless. Wye is deathless. Smart things are bladed. All caesural things are deathless. Round, eased things are dewy. If Wye is raspy then Wye is cinerary. Smart things are bladed. All deathless, bladed things are raspy. Wye is not raspy.", "logic": "\nDewy(alton)\nCinerary(alton)\nEased(everett)\nBladed(ronny)\nCaesural(ronny)\nDeathless(ronny)\nDeathless(wye)\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Bladed(x))\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Deathless(x))\nforall x (Raspy(x) and Eased(x) -> Dewy(x))\nRaspy(wye) -> Cinerary(wye)\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Bladed(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) and Bladed(x) -> Raspy(x))\n\nnot Raspy(wye)\n\nDeathless(wye) and forall x (Deathless(x) -> Bladed(x)) -> therefore Bladed(wye) Deathless(wye) and Bladed(wye) and forall x (Deathless(x) and Bladed(x) -> Raspy(x)) -> therefore Raspy(wye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Johann is activistic. Johann is indexless. Tomlin is rigged. Ilka is orbicular. Ilka is loyal. Ilka is catching. Layla is catching. Smart things are orbicular. All loyal things are catching. Round, rigged things are activistic. If Layla is captious then Layla is indexless. Smart things are orbicular. All catching, orbicular things are captious. Johann is not orbicular.", "logic": "\nActivistic(johann)\nIndexless(johann)\nRigged(tomlin)\nOrbicular(ilka)\nLoyal(ilka)\nCatching(ilka)\nCatching(layla)\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Orbicular(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Catching(x))\nforall x (Captious(x) and Rigged(x) -> Activistic(x))\nCaptious(layla) -> Indexless(layla)\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Orbicular(x))\nforall x (Catching(x) and Orbicular(x) -> Captious(x))\n\nnot Orbicular(johann)\n\nforall x (Catching(x) -> Orbicular(x)) <- forall x (Loyal(x) -> Catching(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Raine is myelinic. Raine is erotic. Mahalia is bodacious. Gilberta is brawny. Gilberta is gummed. Gilberta is logistical. Luke is logistical. Smart things are brawny. All gummed things are logistical. Round, bodacious things are myelinic. If Luke is empowered then Luke is erotic. Smart things are brawny. All logistical, brawny things are empowered. Mahalia is empowered.", "logic": "\nMyelinic(raine)\nErotic(raine)\nBodacious(mahalia)\nBrawny(gilberta)\nGummed(gilberta)\nLogistical(gilberta)\nLogistical(luke)\nforall x (Logistical(x) -> Brawny(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Logistical(x))\nforall x (Empowered(x) and Bodacious(x) -> Myelinic(x))\nEmpowered(luke) -> Erotic(luke)\nforall x (Logistical(x) -> Brawny(x))\nforall x (Logistical(x) and Brawny(x) -> Empowered(x))\n\nEmpowered(mahalia)\n\nforall x (Logistical(x) and Brawny(x) -> Empowered(x)) <- forall x (Gummed(x) -> Logistical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Stu is unbolted. Stu is carinate. Seline is xlvi. Marv is bilobate. Marv is spent. Marv is cardiac. Fernanda is cardiac. Smart things are bilobate. All spent things are cardiac. Round, xlvi things are unbolted. If Fernanda is comal then Fernanda is carinate. Smart things are bilobate. All cardiac, bilobate things are comal. Stu is not comal.", "logic": "\nUnbolted(stu)\nCarinate(stu)\nXlvi(seline)\nBilobate(marv)\nSpent(marv)\nCardiac(marv)\nCardiac(fernanda)\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Comal(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Unbolted(x))\nComal(fernanda) -> Carinate(fernanda)\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Bilobate(x))\nforall x (Cardiac(x) and Bilobate(x) -> Comal(x))\n\nnot Comal(stu)\n\nforall x (Cardiac(x) and Bilobate(x) -> Comal(x)) <- forall x (Spent(x) -> Cardiac(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Reinhard is apotropaic. Reinhard is agrarian. Beth is tzarist. Anabelle is gonzo. Anabelle is antitypic. Anabelle is burnished. Danyelle is burnished. Smart things are gonzo. All antitypic things are burnished. Round, tzarist things are apotropaic. If Danyelle is eonian then Danyelle is agrarian. Smart things are gonzo. All burnished, gonzo things are eonian. Reinhard is antitypic.", "logic": "\nApotropaic(reinhard)\nAgrarian(reinhard)\nTzarist(beth)\nGonzo(anabelle)\nAntitypic(anabelle)\nBurnished(anabelle)\nBurnished(danyelle)\nforall x (Burnished(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nforall x (Antitypic(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Eonian(x) and Tzarist(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\nEonian(danyelle) -> Agrarian(danyelle)\nforall x (Burnished(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Eonian(x))\n\nAntitypic(reinhard)\n\nAntitypic(reinhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Eula is fatherlike. Eula is deist. Hortense is barelegged. Shelba is backward. Shelba is gloved. Shelba is saxatile. Russell is saxatile. Smart things are backward. All gloved things are saxatile. Round, barelegged things are fatherlike. If Russell is hastate then Russell is deist. Smart things are backward. All saxatile, backward things are hastate. Eula is not barelegged.", "logic": "\nFatherlike(eula)\nDeist(eula)\nBarelegged(hortense)\nBackward(shelba)\nGloved(shelba)\nSaxatile(shelba)\nSaxatile(russell)\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Gloved(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nforall x (Hastate(x) and Barelegged(x) -> Fatherlike(x))\nHastate(russell) -> Deist(russell)\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Saxatile(x) and Backward(x) -> Hastate(x))\n\nnot Barelegged(eula)\n\nnot Barelegged(eula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Delores is stillborn. Delores is unfed. Flemming is sent. Cyrille is vehicular. Cyrille is shockable. Cyrille is perirhinal. Kirsti is perirhinal. Smart things are vehicular. All shockable things are perirhinal. Round, sent things are stillborn. If Kirsti is cataclinal then Kirsti is unfed. Smart things are vehicular. All perirhinal, vehicular things are cataclinal. Cyrille is unfed.", "logic": "\nStillborn(delores)\nUnfed(delores)\nSent(flemming)\nVehicular(cyrille)\nShockable(cyrille)\nPerirhinal(cyrille)\nPerirhinal(kirsti)\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Shockable(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) and Sent(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nCataclinal(kirsti) -> Unfed(kirsti)\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) and Vehicular(x) -> Cataclinal(x))\n\nUnfed(cyrille)\n\nUnfed(cyrille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-82"} {"premises": "Cherilynn is leaded. Cherilynn is ascensive. Cherilynn is delusory. Cherilynn is jade. Emmanuel is leaded. Emmanuel is delusory. Emmanuel is bugged. Kind things are leaded. If something is jade and ascensive then it is bugged. Quiet things are ascensive. If something is delusory and repellant then it is focused. All focused, leaded things are bugged. Quiet things are repellant. Green things are repellant. If something is repellant and delusory then it is jade. Emmanuel is leaded.", "logic": "\nLeaded(cherilynn)\nAscensive(cherilynn)\nDelusory(cherilynn)\nJade(cherilynn)\nLeaded(emmanuel)\nDelusory(emmanuel)\nBugged(emmanuel)\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Leaded(x))\nforall x (Jade(x) and Ascensive(x) -> Bugged(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) and Repellant(x) -> Focused(x))\nforall x (Focused(x) and Leaded(x) -> Bugged(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and Delusory(x) -> Jade(x))\n\nLeaded(emmanuel)\n\ntherefore Leaded(emmanuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2818"} {"premises": "Kory is hyperbolic. Kory is childish. Kory is sapless. Kory is lingulate. Essie is hyperbolic. Essie is sapless. Essie is suited. Kind things are hyperbolic. If something is lingulate and childish then it is suited. Quiet things are childish. If something is sapless and mansard then it is spavined. All spavined, hyperbolic things are suited. Quiet things are mansard. Green things are mansard. If something is mansard and sapless then it is lingulate. Essie is not suited.", "logic": "\nHyperbolic(kory)\nChildish(kory)\nSapless(kory)\nLingulate(kory)\nHyperbolic(essie)\nSapless(essie)\nSuited(essie)\nforall x (Mansard(x) -> Hyperbolic(x))\nforall x (Lingulate(x) and Childish(x) -> Suited(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Childish(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) and Mansard(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Spavined(x) and Hyperbolic(x) -> Suited(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Mansard(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Mansard(x))\nforall x (Mansard(x) and Sapless(x) -> Lingulate(x))\n\nnot Suited(essie)\n\ntherefore Suited(essie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2818"} {"premises": "Katherine is adoring. Katherine is shopsoiled. Katherine is unifying. Katherine is diffuse. Mariana is adoring. Mariana is unifying. Mariana is elusive. Kind things are adoring. If something is diffuse and shopsoiled then it is elusive. Quiet things are shopsoiled. If something is unifying and unlogical then it is running. All running, adoring things are elusive. Quiet things are unlogical. Green things are unlogical. If something is unlogical and unifying then it is diffuse. Mariana is unlogical.", "logic": "\nAdoring(katherine)\nShopsoiled(katherine)\nUnifying(katherine)\nDiffuse(katherine)\nAdoring(mariana)\nUnifying(mariana)\nElusive(mariana)\nforall x (Unlogical(x) -> Adoring(x))\nforall x (Diffuse(x) and Shopsoiled(x) -> Elusive(x))\nforall x (Unifying(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Unifying(x) and Unlogical(x) -> Running(x))\nforall x (Running(x) and Adoring(x) -> Elusive(x))\nforall x (Unifying(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Unlogical(x))\nforall x (Unlogical(x) and Unifying(x) -> Diffuse(x))\n\nUnlogical(mariana)\n\nUnifying(mariana) and forall x (Unifying(x) -> Unlogical(x)) -> therefore Unlogical(mariana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2818"} {"premises": "Swen is adjusted. Swen is adequate. Swen is briary. Swen is akimbo. Immanuel is adjusted. Immanuel is briary. Immanuel is southeast. Kind things are adjusted. If something is akimbo and adequate then it is southeast. Quiet things are adequate. If something is briary and bohemian then it is causative. All causative, adjusted things are southeast. Quiet things are bohemian. Green things are bohemian. If something is bohemian and briary then it is akimbo. Immanuel is not bohemian.", "logic": "\nAdjusted(swen)\nAdequate(swen)\nBriary(swen)\nAkimbo(swen)\nAdjusted(immanuel)\nBriary(immanuel)\nSoutheast(immanuel)\nforall x (Bohemian(x) -> Adjusted(x))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) and Adequate(x) -> Southeast(x))\nforall x (Briary(x) -> Adequate(x))\nforall x (Briary(x) and Bohemian(x) -> Causative(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) and Adjusted(x) -> Southeast(x))\nforall x (Briary(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Adequate(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) and Briary(x) -> Akimbo(x))\n\nnot Bohemian(immanuel)\n\nBriary(immanuel) and forall x (Briary(x) -> Bohemian(x)) -> therefore Bohemian(immanuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2818"} {"premises": "Laina is prox. Laina is palsied. Laina is earthly. If someone is windward and not palsied then they are earthly. If someone is palsied and not ovarian then they are earthly. All fiberoptic, ovarian people are not prox. If someone is okay then they are prox. If Laina is prox then Laina is fiberoptic. If someone is fiberoptic and not okay then they are windward. If someone is prox then they are fiberoptic. If Laina is earthly and Laina is ovarian then Laina is windward. Laina is earthly.", "logic": "\nProx(laina)\nPalsied(laina)\nEarthly(laina)\nforall x (Windward(x) and not Palsied(x) -> Earthly(x))\nforall x (Palsied(x) and not Ovarian(x) -> Earthly(x))\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) and Ovarian(x) -> not Prox(x))\nforall x (Okay(x) -> Prox(x))\nProx(laina) -> Fiberoptic(laina)\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) and not Okay(x) -> Windward(x))\nforall x (Prox(x) -> Fiberoptic(x))\nEarthly(laina) and Ovarian(laina) -> Windward(laina)\n\nEarthly(laina)\n\ntherefore Earthly(laina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4519"} {"premises": "Theodosia is soulless. Theodosia is squashy. Theodosia is swingeing. If someone is allusive and not squashy then they are swingeing. If someone is squashy and not insatiate then they are swingeing. All national, insatiate people are not soulless. If someone is tenable then they are soulless. If Theodosia is soulless then Theodosia is national. If someone is national and not tenable then they are allusive. If someone is soulless then they are national. If Theodosia is swingeing and Theodosia is insatiate then Theodosia is allusive. Theodosia is not squashy.", "logic": "\nSoulless(theodosia)\nSquashy(theodosia)\nSwingeing(theodosia)\nforall x (Allusive(x) and not Squashy(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (Squashy(x) and not Insatiate(x) -> Swingeing(x))\nforall x (National(x) and Insatiate(x) -> not Soulless(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Soulless(x))\nSoulless(theodosia) -> National(theodosia)\nforall x (National(x) and not Tenable(x) -> Allusive(x))\nforall x (Soulless(x) -> National(x))\nSwingeing(theodosia) and Insatiate(theodosia) -> Allusive(theodosia)\n\nnot Squashy(theodosia)\n\ntherefore Squashy(theodosia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4519"} {"premises": "Julee is dialectal. Julee is bimodal. Julee is insolent. If someone is lamarckian and not bimodal then they are insolent. If someone is bimodal and not frostian then they are insolent. All french, frostian people are not dialectal. If someone is lissome then they are dialectal. If Julee is dialectal then Julee is french. If someone is french and not lissome then they are lamarckian. If someone is dialectal then they are french. If Julee is insolent and Julee is frostian then Julee is lamarckian. Julee is not lamarckian.", "logic": "\nDialectal(julee)\nBimodal(julee)\nInsolent(julee)\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) and not Bimodal(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Bimodal(x) and not Frostian(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (French(x) and Frostian(x) -> not Dialectal(x))\nforall x (Lissome(x) -> Dialectal(x))\nDialectal(julee) -> French(julee)\nforall x (French(x) and not Lissome(x) -> Lamarckian(x))\nforall x (Dialectal(x) -> French(x))\nInsolent(julee) and Frostian(julee) -> Lamarckian(julee)\n\nnot Lamarckian(julee)\n\nforall x (French(x) and not Lissome(x) -> Lamarckian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4519"} {"premises": "Mohamad is detestable. Mohamad is unifacial. Mohamad is palatine. If someone is colonnaded and not unifacial then they are palatine. If someone is unifacial and not zoological then they are palatine. All unpriestly, zoological people are not detestable. If someone is moist then they are detestable. If Mohamad is detestable then Mohamad is unpriestly. If someone is unpriestly and not moist then they are colonnaded. If someone is detestable then they are unpriestly. If Mohamad is palatine and Mohamad is zoological then Mohamad is colonnaded. Mohamad is zoological.", "logic": "\nDetestable(mohamad)\nUnifacial(mohamad)\nPalatine(mohamad)\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) and not Unifacial(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Unifacial(x) and not Zoological(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and Zoological(x) -> not Detestable(x))\nforall x (Moist(x) -> Detestable(x))\nDetestable(mohamad) -> Unpriestly(mohamad)\nforall x (Unpriestly(x) and not Moist(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Detestable(x) -> Unpriestly(x))\nPalatine(mohamad) and Zoological(mohamad) -> Colonnaded(mohamad)\n\nZoological(mohamad)\n\nZoological(mohamad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4519"} {"premises": "Shanie is propitious. Shanie is radical. Shanie is understood. Shanie is imaginable. Shanie is avellane. Shanie is garbed. Maegan is not propitious. Maegan is radical. Maegan is not delightful. Maegan is understood. Maegan is not avellane. Maegan is garbed. Wandis is not propitious. Wandis is radical. Wandis is imaginable. Wandis is not avellane. If Shanie is delightful and Shanie is garbed then Shanie is imaginable. If Maegan is garbed and Maegan is propitious then Maegan is radical. Green things are imaginable. If something is propitious and not delightful then it is imaginable. If something is delightful and not propitious then it is radical. If something is delightful and avellane then it is not understood. Shanie is propitious.", "logic": "\nPropitious(shanie)\nRadical(shanie)\nUnderstood(shanie)\nImaginable(shanie)\nAvellane(shanie)\nGarbed(shanie)\nnot Propitious(maegan)\nRadical(maegan)\nnot Delightful(maegan)\nUnderstood(maegan)\nnot Avellane(maegan)\nGarbed(maegan)\nnot Propitious(wandis)\nRadical(wandis)\nImaginable(wandis)\nnot Avellane(wandis)\nDelightful(shanie) and Garbed(shanie) -> Imaginable(shanie)\nGarbed(maegan) and Propitious(maegan) -> Radical(maegan)\nforall x (Delightful(x) -> Imaginable(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) and not Delightful(x) -> Imaginable(x))\nforall x (Delightful(x) and not Propitious(x) -> Radical(x))\nforall x (Delightful(x) and Avellane(x) -> not Understood(x))\n\nPropitious(shanie)\n\ntherefore Propitious(shanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3182"} {"premises": "Dario is acanthotic. Dario is pavlovian. Dario is incestuous. Dario is affixed. Dario is furnished. Dario is paranormal. Lina is not acanthotic. Lina is pavlovian. Lina is not rapt. Lina is incestuous. Lina is not furnished. Lina is paranormal. Olivier is not acanthotic. Olivier is pavlovian. Olivier is affixed. Olivier is not furnished. If Dario is rapt and Dario is paranormal then Dario is affixed. If Lina is paranormal and Lina is acanthotic then Lina is pavlovian. Green things are affixed. If something is acanthotic and not rapt then it is affixed. If something is rapt and not acanthotic then it is pavlovian. If something is rapt and furnished then it is not incestuous. Dario is not furnished.", "logic": "\nAcanthotic(dario)\nPavlovian(dario)\nIncestuous(dario)\nAffixed(dario)\nFurnished(dario)\nParanormal(dario)\nnot Acanthotic(lina)\nPavlovian(lina)\nnot Rapt(lina)\nIncestuous(lina)\nnot Furnished(lina)\nParanormal(lina)\nnot Acanthotic(olivier)\nPavlovian(olivier)\nAffixed(olivier)\nnot Furnished(olivier)\nRapt(dario) and Paranormal(dario) -> Affixed(dario)\nParanormal(lina) and Acanthotic(lina) -> Pavlovian(lina)\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Acanthotic(x) and not Rapt(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Rapt(x) and not Acanthotic(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Rapt(x) and Furnished(x) -> not Incestuous(x))\n\nnot Furnished(dario)\n\ntherefore Furnished(dario)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3182"} {"premises": "Wallace is caloric. Wallace is eutrophic. Wallace is austenitic. Wallace is incised. Wallace is albanian. Wallace is logistic. Melvin is not caloric. Melvin is eutrophic. Melvin is not fawning. Melvin is austenitic. Melvin is not albanian. Melvin is logistic. Bernardo is not caloric. Bernardo is eutrophic. Bernardo is incised. Bernardo is not albanian. If Wallace is fawning and Wallace is logistic then Wallace is incised. If Melvin is logistic and Melvin is caloric then Melvin is eutrophic. Green things are incised. If something is caloric and not fawning then it is incised. If something is fawning and not caloric then it is eutrophic. If something is fawning and albanian then it is not austenitic. Melvin is not incised.", "logic": "\nCaloric(wallace)\nEutrophic(wallace)\nAustenitic(wallace)\nIncised(wallace)\nAlbanian(wallace)\nLogistic(wallace)\nnot Caloric(melvin)\nEutrophic(melvin)\nnot Fawning(melvin)\nAustenitic(melvin)\nnot Albanian(melvin)\nLogistic(melvin)\nnot Caloric(bernardo)\nEutrophic(bernardo)\nIncised(bernardo)\nnot Albanian(bernardo)\nFawning(wallace) and Logistic(wallace) -> Incised(wallace)\nLogistic(melvin) and Caloric(melvin) -> Eutrophic(melvin)\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Incised(x))\nforall x (Caloric(x) and not Fawning(x) -> Incised(x))\nforall x (Fawning(x) and not Caloric(x) -> Eutrophic(x))\nforall x (Fawning(x) and Albanian(x) -> not Austenitic(x))\n\nnot Incised(melvin)\n\nforall x (Fawning(x) -> Incised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3182"} {"premises": "Towney is alaskan. Towney is charitable. Towney is grandiose. Towney is filarial. Towney is coarctate. Towney is uninjured. Caroljean is not alaskan. Caroljean is charitable. Caroljean is not cloggy. Caroljean is grandiose. Caroljean is not coarctate. Caroljean is uninjured. Anthia is not alaskan. Anthia is charitable. Anthia is filarial. Anthia is not coarctate. If Towney is cloggy and Towney is uninjured then Towney is filarial. If Caroljean is uninjured and Caroljean is alaskan then Caroljean is charitable. Green things are filarial. If something is alaskan and not cloggy then it is filarial. If something is cloggy and not alaskan then it is charitable. If something is cloggy and coarctate then it is not grandiose. Anthia is grandiose.", "logic": "\nAlaskan(towney)\nCharitable(towney)\nGrandiose(towney)\nFilarial(towney)\nCoarctate(towney)\nUninjured(towney)\nnot Alaskan(caroljean)\nCharitable(caroljean)\nnot Cloggy(caroljean)\nGrandiose(caroljean)\nnot Coarctate(caroljean)\nUninjured(caroljean)\nnot Alaskan(anthia)\nCharitable(anthia)\nFilarial(anthia)\nnot Coarctate(anthia)\nCloggy(towney) and Uninjured(towney) -> Filarial(towney)\nUninjured(caroljean) and Alaskan(caroljean) -> Charitable(caroljean)\nforall x (Cloggy(x) -> Filarial(x))\nforall x (Alaskan(x) and not Cloggy(x) -> Filarial(x))\nforall x (Cloggy(x) and not Alaskan(x) -> Charitable(x))\nforall x (Cloggy(x) and Coarctate(x) -> not Grandiose(x))\n\nGrandiose(anthia)\n\nGrandiose(anthia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3182"} {"premises": "The micaela is juvenile. The micaela is cackly. The micaela is sizzling. The micaela garnishee the lucille. The lucille is sizzling. The lucille velcro the micaela. The lucille garnishee the hunter. The lucille aluminise the micaela. The hunter is obtainable. The hunter is juvenile. The hunter is astomatal. The hunter velcro the lucille. The hunter garnishee the micaela. The hunter garnishee the lucille. The hunter aluminise the micaela. The hunter aluminise the lucille. If something is sizzling and it velcro the lucille then it aluminise the hunter. If something garnishee the hunter then it garnishee the lucille. If something is obtainable and it velcro the hunter then it is juvenile. If something aluminise the hunter then the hunter is sizzling. If something aluminise the lucille then the lucille aluminise the hunter. If something garnishee the lucille and the lucille is astomatal then the lucille velcro the micaela. The micaela is juvenile.", "logic": "\nJuvenile(micaela)\nCackly(micaela)\nSizzling(micaela)\nGarnishee(micaela, lucille)\nSizzling(lucille)\nVelcro(lucille, micaela)\nGarnishee(lucille, hunter)\nAluminise(lucille, micaela)\nObtainable(hunter)\nJuvenile(hunter)\nAstomatal(hunter)\nVelcro(hunter, lucille)\nGarnishee(hunter, micaela)\nGarnishee(hunter, lucille)\nAluminise(hunter, micaela)\nAluminise(hunter, lucille)\nforall x (Sizzling(x) and Velcro(x, lucille) -> Aluminise(x, hunter))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, hunter) -> Garnishee(x, lucille))\nforall x (Obtainable(x) and Velcro(x, hunter) -> Juvenile(x))\nforall x (Aluminise(x, hunter) -> Sizzling(hunter))\nforall x (Aluminise(x, lucille) -> Aluminise(lucille, hunter))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, lucille) and Astomatal(lucille) -> Velcro(lucille, micaela))\n\nJuvenile(micaela)\n\ntherefore Juvenile(micaela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The morgan is trapped. The morgan is inchoate. The morgan is arresting. The morgan placate the stefania. The stefania is arresting. The stefania brief the morgan. The stefania placate the lind. The stefania garland the morgan. The lind is padded. The lind is trapped. The lind is exaugural. The lind brief the stefania. The lind placate the morgan. The lind placate the stefania. The lind garland the morgan. The lind garland the stefania. If something is arresting and it brief the stefania then it garland the lind. If something placate the lind then it placate the stefania. If something is padded and it brief the lind then it is trapped. If something garland the lind then the lind is arresting. If something garland the stefania then the stefania garland the lind. If something placate the stefania and the stefania is exaugural then the stefania brief the morgan. The stefania does not need the lind.", "logic": "\nTrapped(morgan)\nInchoate(morgan)\nArresting(morgan)\nPlacate(morgan, stefania)\nArresting(stefania)\nBrief(stefania, morgan)\nPlacate(stefania, lind)\nGarland(stefania, morgan)\nPadded(lind)\nTrapped(lind)\nExaugural(lind)\nBrief(lind, stefania)\nPlacate(lind, morgan)\nPlacate(lind, stefania)\nGarland(lind, morgan)\nGarland(lind, stefania)\nforall x (Arresting(x) and Brief(x, stefania) -> Garland(x, lind))\nforall x (Placate(x, lind) -> Placate(x, stefania))\nforall x (Padded(x) and Brief(x, lind) -> Trapped(x))\nforall x (Garland(x, lind) -> Arresting(lind))\nforall x (Garland(x, stefania) -> Garland(stefania, lind))\nforall x (Placate(x, stefania) and Exaugural(stefania) -> Brief(stefania, morgan))\n\nnot Placate(stefania, lind)\n\ntherefore Placate(stefania, lind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The deonne is abysmal. The deonne is phreatic. The deonne is crowing. The deonne vanquish the dierdre. The dierdre is crowing. The dierdre reprint the deonne. The dierdre vanquish the laurel. The dierdre dispense the deonne. The laurel is amyloid. The laurel is abysmal. The laurel is unsighted. The laurel reprint the dierdre. The laurel vanquish the deonne. The laurel vanquish the dierdre. The laurel dispense the deonne. The laurel dispense the dierdre. If something is crowing and it reprint the dierdre then it dispense the laurel. If something vanquish the laurel then it vanquish the dierdre. If something is amyloid and it reprint the laurel then it is abysmal. If something dispense the laurel then the laurel is crowing. If something dispense the dierdre then the dierdre dispense the laurel. If something vanquish the dierdre and the dierdre is unsighted then the dierdre reprint the deonne. The dierdre dispense the laurel.", "logic": "\nAbysmal(deonne)\nPhreatic(deonne)\nCrowing(deonne)\nVanquish(deonne, dierdre)\nCrowing(dierdre)\nReprint(dierdre, deonne)\nVanquish(dierdre, laurel)\nDispense(dierdre, deonne)\nAmyloid(laurel)\nAbysmal(laurel)\nUnsighted(laurel)\nReprint(laurel, dierdre)\nVanquish(laurel, deonne)\nVanquish(laurel, dierdre)\nDispense(laurel, deonne)\nDispense(laurel, dierdre)\nforall x (Crowing(x) and Reprint(x, dierdre) -> Dispense(x, laurel))\nforall x (Vanquish(x, laurel) -> Vanquish(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Amyloid(x) and Reprint(x, laurel) -> Abysmal(x))\nforall x (Dispense(x, laurel) -> Crowing(laurel))\nforall x (Dispense(x, dierdre) -> Dispense(dierdre, laurel))\nforall x (Vanquish(x, dierdre) and Unsighted(dierdre) -> Reprint(dierdre, deonne))\n\nDispense(dierdre, laurel)\n\nDispense(laurel, dierdre) and forall x (Dispense(x, dierdre) -> Dispense(dierdre, laurel)) -> therefore Dispense(dierdre, laurel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The margette is cubic. The margette is baptised. The margette is deductive. The margette rush the benni. The benni is deductive. The benni honey the margette. The benni rush the lazar. The benni advertize the margette. The lazar is sprawly. The lazar is cubic. The lazar is fretted. The lazar honey the benni. The lazar rush the margette. The lazar rush the benni. The lazar advertize the margette. The lazar advertize the benni. If something is deductive and it honey the benni then it advertize the lazar. If something rush the lazar then it rush the benni. If something is sprawly and it honey the lazar then it is cubic. If something advertize the lazar then the lazar is deductive. If something advertize the benni then the benni advertize the lazar. If something rush the benni and the benni is fretted then the benni honey the margette. The benni does not need the benni.", "logic": "\nCubic(margette)\nBaptised(margette)\nDeductive(margette)\nRush(margette, benni)\nDeductive(benni)\nHoney(benni, margette)\nRush(benni, lazar)\nAdvertize(benni, margette)\nSprawly(lazar)\nCubic(lazar)\nFretted(lazar)\nHoney(lazar, benni)\nRush(lazar, margette)\nRush(lazar, benni)\nAdvertize(lazar, margette)\nAdvertize(lazar, benni)\nforall x (Deductive(x) and Honey(x, benni) -> Advertize(x, lazar))\nforall x (Rush(x, lazar) -> Rush(x, benni))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) and Honey(x, lazar) -> Cubic(x))\nforall x (Advertize(x, lazar) -> Deductive(lazar))\nforall x (Advertize(x, benni) -> Advertize(benni, lazar))\nforall x (Rush(x, benni) and Fretted(benni) -> Honey(benni, margette))\n\nnot Rush(benni, benni)\n\nRush(benni, lazar) and forall x (Rush(x, lazar) -> Rush(x, benni)) -> therefore Rush(benni, benni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The melisent is cambrian. The melisent is unitary. The melisent is orthoptic. The melisent shout the foster. The foster is orthoptic. The foster minister the melisent. The foster shout the patsy. The foster overfeed the melisent. The patsy is cislunar. The patsy is cambrian. The patsy is orphaned. The patsy minister the foster. The patsy shout the melisent. The patsy shout the foster. The patsy overfeed the melisent. The patsy overfeed the foster. If something is orthoptic and it minister the foster then it overfeed the patsy. If something shout the patsy then it shout the foster. If something is cislunar and it minister the patsy then it is cambrian. If something overfeed the patsy then the patsy is orthoptic. If something overfeed the foster then the foster overfeed the patsy. If something shout the foster and the foster is orphaned then the foster minister the melisent. The patsy is orthoptic.", "logic": "\nCambrian(melisent)\nUnitary(melisent)\nOrthoptic(melisent)\nShout(melisent, foster)\nOrthoptic(foster)\nMinister(foster, melisent)\nShout(foster, patsy)\nOverfeed(foster, melisent)\nCislunar(patsy)\nCambrian(patsy)\nOrphaned(patsy)\nMinister(patsy, foster)\nShout(patsy, melisent)\nShout(patsy, foster)\nOverfeed(patsy, melisent)\nOverfeed(patsy, foster)\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) and Minister(x, foster) -> Overfeed(x, patsy))\nforall x (Shout(x, patsy) -> Shout(x, foster))\nforall x (Cislunar(x) and Minister(x, patsy) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, patsy) -> Orthoptic(patsy))\nforall x (Overfeed(x, foster) -> Overfeed(foster, patsy))\nforall x (Shout(x, foster) and Orphaned(foster) -> Minister(foster, melisent))\n\nOrthoptic(patsy)\n\nOverfeed(patsy, foster) and forall x (Overfeed(x, foster) -> Overfeed(foster, patsy)) -> therefore Overfeed(foster, patsy) Overfeed(foster, patsy) and forall x (Overfeed(x, patsy) -> Orthoptic(patsy)) -> therefore Orthoptic(patsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The brooke is orthoptic. The brooke is labiate. The brooke is inferior. The brooke agnise the constancy. The constancy is inferior. The constancy iron the brooke. The constancy agnise the kingsley. The constancy reify the brooke. The kingsley is shoaly. The kingsley is orthoptic. The kingsley is bullnecked. The kingsley iron the constancy. The kingsley agnise the brooke. The kingsley agnise the constancy. The kingsley reify the brooke. The kingsley reify the constancy. If something is inferior and it iron the constancy then it reify the kingsley. If something agnise the kingsley then it agnise the constancy. If something is shoaly and it iron the kingsley then it is orthoptic. If something reify the kingsley then the kingsley is inferior. If something reify the constancy then the constancy reify the kingsley. If something agnise the constancy and the constancy is bullnecked then the constancy iron the brooke. The kingsley is not inferior.", "logic": "\nOrthoptic(brooke)\nLabiate(brooke)\nInferior(brooke)\nAgnise(brooke, constancy)\nInferior(constancy)\nIron(constancy, brooke)\nAgnise(constancy, kingsley)\nReify(constancy, brooke)\nShoaly(kingsley)\nOrthoptic(kingsley)\nBullnecked(kingsley)\nIron(kingsley, constancy)\nAgnise(kingsley, brooke)\nAgnise(kingsley, constancy)\nReify(kingsley, brooke)\nReify(kingsley, constancy)\nforall x (Inferior(x) and Iron(x, constancy) -> Reify(x, kingsley))\nforall x (Agnise(x, kingsley) -> Agnise(x, constancy))\nforall x (Shoaly(x) and Iron(x, kingsley) -> Orthoptic(x))\nforall x (Reify(x, kingsley) -> Inferior(kingsley))\nforall x (Reify(x, constancy) -> Reify(constancy, kingsley))\nforall x (Agnise(x, constancy) and Bullnecked(constancy) -> Iron(constancy, brooke))\n\nnot Inferior(kingsley)\n\nReify(kingsley, constancy) and forall x (Reify(x, constancy) -> Reify(constancy, kingsley)) -> therefore Reify(constancy, kingsley) Reify(constancy, kingsley) and forall x (Reify(x, kingsley) -> Inferior(kingsley)) -> therefore Inferior(kingsley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The ardine is coming. The ardine is acerbic. The ardine is unrewarded. The ardine boss the way. The way is unrewarded. The way flour the ardine. The way boss the martelle. The way voyage the ardine. The martelle is proximate. The martelle is coming. The martelle is parvenu. The martelle flour the way. The martelle boss the ardine. The martelle boss the way. The martelle voyage the ardine. The martelle voyage the way. If something is unrewarded and it flour the way then it voyage the martelle. If something boss the martelle then it boss the way. If something is proximate and it flour the martelle then it is coming. If something voyage the martelle then the martelle is unrewarded. If something voyage the way then the way voyage the martelle. If something boss the way and the way is parvenu then the way flour the ardine. The martelle voyage the martelle.", "logic": "\nComing(ardine)\nAcerbic(ardine)\nUnrewarded(ardine)\nBoss(ardine, way)\nUnrewarded(way)\nFlour(way, ardine)\nBoss(way, martelle)\nVoyage(way, ardine)\nProximate(martelle)\nComing(martelle)\nParvenu(martelle)\nFlour(martelle, way)\nBoss(martelle, ardine)\nBoss(martelle, way)\nVoyage(martelle, ardine)\nVoyage(martelle, way)\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) and Flour(x, way) -> Voyage(x, martelle))\nforall x (Boss(x, martelle) -> Boss(x, way))\nforall x (Proximate(x) and Flour(x, martelle) -> Coming(x))\nforall x (Voyage(x, martelle) -> Unrewarded(martelle))\nforall x (Voyage(x, way) -> Voyage(way, martelle))\nforall x (Boss(x, way) and Parvenu(way) -> Flour(way, ardine))\n\nVoyage(martelle, martelle)\n\nVoyage(martelle, way) and forall x (Voyage(x, way) -> Voyage(way, martelle)) -> therefore Voyage(way, martelle) Voyage(way, martelle) and forall x (Voyage(x, martelle) -> Unrewarded(martelle)) -> therefore Unrewarded(martelle) Unrewarded(martelle) and Flour(martelle, way) and forall x (Unrewarded(x) and Flour(x, way) -> Voyage(x, martelle)) -> therefore Voyage(martelle, martelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The jolie is cutaneal. The jolie is papery. The jolie is brainish. The jolie speculate the aimil. The aimil is brainish. The aimil proscribe the jolie. The aimil speculate the carrol. The aimil pigeonhole the jolie. The carrol is besotted. The carrol is cutaneal. The carrol is schmalzy. The carrol proscribe the aimil. The carrol speculate the jolie. The carrol speculate the aimil. The carrol pigeonhole the jolie. The carrol pigeonhole the aimil. If something is brainish and it proscribe the aimil then it pigeonhole the carrol. If something speculate the carrol then it speculate the aimil. If something is besotted and it proscribe the carrol then it is cutaneal. If something pigeonhole the carrol then the carrol is brainish. If something pigeonhole the aimil then the aimil pigeonhole the carrol. If something speculate the aimil and the aimil is schmalzy then the aimil proscribe the jolie. The carrol does not see the carrol.", "logic": "\nCutaneal(jolie)\nPapery(jolie)\nBrainish(jolie)\nSpeculate(jolie, aimil)\nBrainish(aimil)\nProscribe(aimil, jolie)\nSpeculate(aimil, carrol)\nPigeonhole(aimil, jolie)\nBesotted(carrol)\nCutaneal(carrol)\nSchmalzy(carrol)\nProscribe(carrol, aimil)\nSpeculate(carrol, jolie)\nSpeculate(carrol, aimil)\nPigeonhole(carrol, jolie)\nPigeonhole(carrol, aimil)\nforall x (Brainish(x) and Proscribe(x, aimil) -> Pigeonhole(x, carrol))\nforall x (Speculate(x, carrol) -> Speculate(x, aimil))\nforall x (Besotted(x) and Proscribe(x, carrol) -> Cutaneal(x))\nforall x (Pigeonhole(x, carrol) -> Brainish(carrol))\nforall x (Pigeonhole(x, aimil) -> Pigeonhole(aimil, carrol))\nforall x (Speculate(x, aimil) and Schmalzy(aimil) -> Proscribe(aimil, jolie))\n\nnot Pigeonhole(carrol, carrol)\n\nPigeonhole(carrol, aimil) and forall x (Pigeonhole(x, aimil) -> Pigeonhole(aimil, carrol)) -> therefore Pigeonhole(aimil, carrol) Pigeonhole(aimil, carrol) and forall x (Pigeonhole(x, carrol) -> Brainish(carrol)) -> therefore Brainish(carrol) Brainish(carrol) and Proscribe(carrol, aimil) and forall x (Brainish(x) and Proscribe(x, aimil) -> Pigeonhole(x, carrol)) -> therefore Pigeonhole(carrol, carrol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The nike is mimic. The nike is unrimed. The nike is inflowing. The nike autopsy the courtenay. The courtenay is inflowing. The courtenay stipple the nike. The courtenay autopsy the ortensia. The courtenay implement the nike. The ortensia is edematous. The ortensia is mimic. The ortensia is habitable. The ortensia stipple the courtenay. The ortensia autopsy the nike. The ortensia autopsy the courtenay. The ortensia implement the nike. The ortensia implement the courtenay. If something is inflowing and it stipple the courtenay then it implement the ortensia. If something autopsy the ortensia then it autopsy the courtenay. If something is edematous and it stipple the ortensia then it is mimic. If something implement the ortensia then the ortensia is inflowing. If something implement the courtenay then the courtenay implement the ortensia. If something autopsy the courtenay and the courtenay is habitable then the courtenay stipple the nike. The nike does not see the ortensia.", "logic": "\nMimic(nike)\nUnrimed(nike)\nInflowing(nike)\nAutopsy(nike, courtenay)\nInflowing(courtenay)\nStipple(courtenay, nike)\nAutopsy(courtenay, ortensia)\nImplement(courtenay, nike)\nEdematous(ortensia)\nMimic(ortensia)\nHabitable(ortensia)\nStipple(ortensia, courtenay)\nAutopsy(ortensia, nike)\nAutopsy(ortensia, courtenay)\nImplement(ortensia, nike)\nImplement(ortensia, courtenay)\nforall x (Inflowing(x) and Stipple(x, courtenay) -> Implement(x, ortensia))\nforall x (Autopsy(x, ortensia) -> Autopsy(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Edematous(x) and Stipple(x, ortensia) -> Mimic(x))\nforall x (Implement(x, ortensia) -> Inflowing(ortensia))\nforall x (Implement(x, courtenay) -> Implement(courtenay, ortensia))\nforall x (Autopsy(x, courtenay) and Habitable(courtenay) -> Stipple(courtenay, nike))\n\nnot Implement(nike, ortensia)\n\nforall x (Inflowing(x) and Stipple(x, courtenay) -> Implement(x, ortensia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The harland is shoeless. The harland is ratty. The harland is manorial. The harland overawe the margurite. The margurite is manorial. The margurite tenure the harland. The margurite overawe the horace. The margurite crumb the harland. The horace is sapless. The horace is shoeless. The horace is individual. The horace tenure the margurite. The horace overawe the harland. The horace overawe the margurite. The horace crumb the harland. The horace crumb the margurite. If something is manorial and it tenure the margurite then it crumb the horace. If something overawe the horace then it overawe the margurite. If something is sapless and it tenure the horace then it is shoeless. If something crumb the horace then the horace is manorial. If something crumb the margurite then the margurite crumb the horace. If something overawe the margurite and the margurite is individual then the margurite tenure the harland. The margurite is shoeless.", "logic": "\nShoeless(harland)\nRatty(harland)\nManorial(harland)\nOverawe(harland, margurite)\nManorial(margurite)\nTenure(margurite, harland)\nOverawe(margurite, horace)\nCrumb(margurite, harland)\nSapless(horace)\nShoeless(horace)\nIndividual(horace)\nTenure(horace, margurite)\nOverawe(horace, harland)\nOverawe(horace, margurite)\nCrumb(horace, harland)\nCrumb(horace, margurite)\nforall x (Manorial(x) and Tenure(x, margurite) -> Crumb(x, horace))\nforall x (Overawe(x, horace) -> Overawe(x, margurite))\nforall x (Sapless(x) and Tenure(x, horace) -> Shoeless(x))\nforall x (Crumb(x, horace) -> Manorial(horace))\nforall x (Crumb(x, margurite) -> Crumb(margurite, horace))\nforall x (Overawe(x, margurite) and Individual(margurite) -> Tenure(margurite, harland))\n\nShoeless(margurite)\n\nforall x (Sapless(x) and Tenure(x, horace) -> Shoeless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The kimmie is braggy. The kimmie is supernal. The kimmie is undefended. The kimmie sail the monica. The monica is undefended. The monica debar the kimmie. The monica sail the elmore. The monica carjack the kimmie. The elmore is aleutian. The elmore is braggy. The elmore is racemose. The elmore debar the monica. The elmore sail the kimmie. The elmore sail the monica. The elmore carjack the kimmie. The elmore carjack the monica. If something is undefended and it debar the monica then it carjack the elmore. If something sail the elmore then it sail the monica. If something is aleutian and it debar the elmore then it is braggy. If something carjack the elmore then the elmore is undefended. If something carjack the monica then the monica carjack the elmore. If something sail the monica and the monica is racemose then the monica debar the kimmie. The kimmie is not aleutian.", "logic": "\nBraggy(kimmie)\nSupernal(kimmie)\nUndefended(kimmie)\nSail(kimmie, monica)\nUndefended(monica)\nDebar(monica, kimmie)\nSail(monica, elmore)\nCarjack(monica, kimmie)\nAleutian(elmore)\nBraggy(elmore)\nRacemose(elmore)\nDebar(elmore, monica)\nSail(elmore, kimmie)\nSail(elmore, monica)\nCarjack(elmore, kimmie)\nCarjack(elmore, monica)\nforall x (Undefended(x) and Debar(x, monica) -> Carjack(x, elmore))\nforall x (Sail(x, elmore) -> Sail(x, monica))\nforall x (Aleutian(x) and Debar(x, elmore) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Carjack(x, elmore) -> Undefended(elmore))\nforall x (Carjack(x, monica) -> Carjack(monica, elmore))\nforall x (Sail(x, monica) and Racemose(monica) -> Debar(monica, kimmie))\n\nnot Aleutian(kimmie)\n\nnot Aleutian(kimmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The letisha is pyloric. The letisha is autophytic. The letisha is biserrate. The letisha quake the patrick. The patrick is biserrate. The patrick cudgel the letisha. The patrick quake the winnie. The patrick funnel the letisha. The winnie is amenable. The winnie is pyloric. The winnie is indecent. The winnie cudgel the patrick. The winnie quake the letisha. The winnie quake the patrick. The winnie funnel the letisha. The winnie funnel the patrick. If something is biserrate and it cudgel the patrick then it funnel the winnie. If something quake the winnie then it quake the patrick. If something is amenable and it cudgel the winnie then it is pyloric. If something funnel the winnie then the winnie is biserrate. If something funnel the patrick then the patrick funnel the winnie. If something quake the patrick and the patrick is indecent then the patrick cudgel the letisha. The patrick funnel the patrick.", "logic": "\nPyloric(letisha)\nAutophytic(letisha)\nBiserrate(letisha)\nQuake(letisha, patrick)\nBiserrate(patrick)\nCudgel(patrick, letisha)\nQuake(patrick, winnie)\nFunnel(patrick, letisha)\nAmenable(winnie)\nPyloric(winnie)\nIndecent(winnie)\nCudgel(winnie, patrick)\nQuake(winnie, letisha)\nQuake(winnie, patrick)\nFunnel(winnie, letisha)\nFunnel(winnie, patrick)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) and Cudgel(x, patrick) -> Funnel(x, winnie))\nforall x (Quake(x, winnie) -> Quake(x, patrick))\nforall x (Amenable(x) and Cudgel(x, winnie) -> Pyloric(x))\nforall x (Funnel(x, winnie) -> Biserrate(winnie))\nforall x (Funnel(x, patrick) -> Funnel(patrick, winnie))\nforall x (Quake(x, patrick) and Indecent(patrick) -> Cudgel(patrick, letisha))\n\nFunnel(patrick, patrick)\n\nFunnel(patrick, patrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The elvira is gibelike. The elvira is reticent. The elvira is triumphal. The elvira unwrap the wallie. The wallie is triumphal. The wallie metalize the elvira. The wallie unwrap the joy. The wallie waver the elvira. The joy is grasslike. The joy is gibelike. The joy is passionate. The joy metalize the wallie. The joy unwrap the elvira. The joy unwrap the wallie. The joy waver the elvira. The joy waver the wallie. If something is triumphal and it metalize the wallie then it waver the joy. If something unwrap the joy then it unwrap the wallie. If something is grasslike and it metalize the joy then it is gibelike. If something waver the joy then the joy is triumphal. If something waver the wallie then the wallie waver the joy. If something unwrap the wallie and the wallie is passionate then the wallie metalize the elvira. The elvira does not like the elvira.", "logic": "\nGibelike(elvira)\nReticent(elvira)\nTriumphal(elvira)\nUnwrap(elvira, wallie)\nTriumphal(wallie)\nMetalize(wallie, elvira)\nUnwrap(wallie, joy)\nWaver(wallie, elvira)\nGrasslike(joy)\nGibelike(joy)\nPassionate(joy)\nMetalize(joy, wallie)\nUnwrap(joy, elvira)\nUnwrap(joy, wallie)\nWaver(joy, elvira)\nWaver(joy, wallie)\nforall x (Triumphal(x) and Metalize(x, wallie) -> Waver(x, joy))\nforall x (Unwrap(x, joy) -> Unwrap(x, wallie))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) and Metalize(x, joy) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Waver(x, joy) -> Triumphal(joy))\nforall x (Waver(x, wallie) -> Waver(wallie, joy))\nforall x (Unwrap(x, wallie) and Passionate(wallie) -> Metalize(wallie, elvira))\n\nnot Metalize(elvira, elvira)\n\nnot Metalize(elvira, elvira) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The courtenay is indecisive. The courtenay is flawless. The courtenay is vagile. The courtenay elevate the reggy. The reggy is vagile. The reggy upload the courtenay. The reggy elevate the harlan. The reggy thieve the courtenay. The harlan is hawkish. The harlan is indecisive. The harlan is nonsweet. The harlan upload the reggy. The harlan elevate the courtenay. The harlan elevate the reggy. The harlan thieve the courtenay. The harlan thieve the reggy. If something is vagile and it upload the reggy then it thieve the harlan. If something elevate the harlan then it elevate the reggy. If something is hawkish and it upload the harlan then it is indecisive. If something thieve the harlan then the harlan is vagile. If something thieve the reggy then the reggy thieve the harlan. If something elevate the reggy and the reggy is nonsweet then the reggy upload the courtenay. The reggy upload the reggy.", "logic": "\nIndecisive(courtenay)\nFlawless(courtenay)\nVagile(courtenay)\nElevate(courtenay, reggy)\nVagile(reggy)\nUpload(reggy, courtenay)\nElevate(reggy, harlan)\nThieve(reggy, courtenay)\nHawkish(harlan)\nIndecisive(harlan)\nNonsweet(harlan)\nUpload(harlan, reggy)\nElevate(harlan, courtenay)\nElevate(harlan, reggy)\nThieve(harlan, courtenay)\nThieve(harlan, reggy)\nforall x (Vagile(x) and Upload(x, reggy) -> Thieve(x, harlan))\nforall x (Elevate(x, harlan) -> Elevate(x, reggy))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and Upload(x, harlan) -> Indecisive(x))\nforall x (Thieve(x, harlan) -> Vagile(harlan))\nforall x (Thieve(x, reggy) -> Thieve(reggy, harlan))\nforall x (Elevate(x, reggy) and Nonsweet(reggy) -> Upload(reggy, courtenay))\n\nUpload(reggy, reggy)\n\nUpload(reggy, reggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The ashleigh is lifesize. The ashleigh is addable. The ashleigh is whirring. The ashleigh typeset the chloette. The chloette is whirring. The chloette surmise the ashleigh. The chloette typeset the agathe. The chloette damn the ashleigh. The agathe is motored. The agathe is lifesize. The agathe is exuberant. The agathe surmise the chloette. The agathe typeset the ashleigh. The agathe typeset the chloette. The agathe damn the ashleigh. The agathe damn the chloette. If something is whirring and it surmise the chloette then it damn the agathe. If something typeset the agathe then it typeset the chloette. If something is motored and it surmise the agathe then it is lifesize. If something damn the agathe then the agathe is whirring. If something damn the chloette then the chloette damn the agathe. If something typeset the chloette and the chloette is exuberant then the chloette surmise the ashleigh. The chloette is not motored.", "logic": "\nLifesize(ashleigh)\nAddable(ashleigh)\nWhirring(ashleigh)\nTypeset(ashleigh, chloette)\nWhirring(chloette)\nSurmise(chloette, ashleigh)\nTypeset(chloette, agathe)\nDamn(chloette, ashleigh)\nMotored(agathe)\nLifesize(agathe)\nExuberant(agathe)\nSurmise(agathe, chloette)\nTypeset(agathe, ashleigh)\nTypeset(agathe, chloette)\nDamn(agathe, ashleigh)\nDamn(agathe, chloette)\nforall x (Whirring(x) and Surmise(x, chloette) -> Damn(x, agathe))\nforall x (Typeset(x, agathe) -> Typeset(x, chloette))\nforall x (Motored(x) and Surmise(x, agathe) -> Lifesize(x))\nforall x (Damn(x, agathe) -> Whirring(agathe))\nforall x (Damn(x, chloette) -> Damn(chloette, agathe))\nforall x (Typeset(x, chloette) and Exuberant(chloette) -> Surmise(chloette, ashleigh))\n\nnot Motored(chloette)\n\nnot Motored(chloette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The talbot is surviving. The talbot is overbusy. The talbot is honeylike. The talbot stoop the husein. The husein is honeylike. The husein thrive the talbot. The husein stoop the dela. The husein embezzle the talbot. The dela is antimonic. The dela is surviving. The dela is isoclinal. The dela thrive the husein. The dela stoop the talbot. The dela stoop the husein. The dela embezzle the talbot. The dela embezzle the husein. If something is honeylike and it thrive the husein then it embezzle the dela. If something stoop the dela then it stoop the husein. If something is antimonic and it thrive the dela then it is surviving. If something embezzle the dela then the dela is honeylike. If something embezzle the husein then the husein embezzle the dela. If something stoop the husein and the husein is isoclinal then the husein thrive the talbot. The husein is isoclinal.", "logic": "\nSurviving(talbot)\nOverbusy(talbot)\nHoneylike(talbot)\nStoop(talbot, husein)\nHoneylike(husein)\nThrive(husein, talbot)\nStoop(husein, dela)\nEmbezzle(husein, talbot)\nAntimonic(dela)\nSurviving(dela)\nIsoclinal(dela)\nThrive(dela, husein)\nStoop(dela, talbot)\nStoop(dela, husein)\nEmbezzle(dela, talbot)\nEmbezzle(dela, husein)\nforall x (Honeylike(x) and Thrive(x, husein) -> Embezzle(x, dela))\nforall x (Stoop(x, dela) -> Stoop(x, husein))\nforall x (Antimonic(x) and Thrive(x, dela) -> Surviving(x))\nforall x (Embezzle(x, dela) -> Honeylike(dela))\nforall x (Embezzle(x, husein) -> Embezzle(husein, dela))\nforall x (Stoop(x, husein) and Isoclinal(husein) -> Thrive(husein, talbot))\n\nIsoclinal(husein)\n\nIsoclinal(husein) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1150"} {"premises": "The fania fodder the xylina. The xylina deform the fania. The xylina is receivable. If something iodinate the xylina then it deform the fania. If something fodder the fania and the fania fodder the xylina then the xylina deform the fania. If something deform the fania then the fania iodinate the xylina. If something fodder the fania then it is receivable. If something deform the xylina then the xylina is undreamt. If something deform the xylina and it is undreamt then the xylina iodinate the fania. If something is receivable and it fodder the xylina then the xylina fodder the fania. If something is receivable then it deform the xylina. The xylina is receivable.", "logic": "\nFodder(fania, xylina)\nDeform(xylina, fania)\nReceivable(xylina)\nforall x (Iodinate(x, xylina) -> Deform(x, fania))\nforall x (Fodder(x, fania) and Fodder(fania, xylina) -> Deform(xylina, fania))\nforall x (Deform(x, fania) -> Iodinate(fania, xylina))\nforall x (Fodder(x, fania) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Deform(x, xylina) -> Undreamt(xylina))\nforall x (Deform(x, xylina) and Undreamt(x) -> Iodinate(xylina, fania))\nforall x (Receivable(x) and Fodder(x, xylina) -> Fodder(xylina, fania))\nforall x (Receivable(x) -> Deform(x, xylina))\n\nReceivable(xylina)\n\ntherefore Receivable(xylina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The jelene lighter the sibyl. The sibyl tailor the jelene. The sibyl is clarion. If something electrify the sibyl then it tailor the jelene. If something lighter the jelene and the jelene lighter the sibyl then the sibyl tailor the jelene. If something tailor the jelene then the jelene electrify the sibyl. If something lighter the jelene then it is clarion. If something tailor the sibyl then the sibyl is dorian. If something tailor the sibyl and it is dorian then the sibyl electrify the jelene. If something is clarion and it lighter the sibyl then the sibyl lighter the jelene. If something is clarion then it tailor the sibyl. The sibyl does not chase the jelene.", "logic": "\nLighter(jelene, sibyl)\nTailor(sibyl, jelene)\nClarion(sibyl)\nforall x (Electrify(x, sibyl) -> Tailor(x, jelene))\nforall x (Lighter(x, jelene) and Lighter(jelene, sibyl) -> Tailor(sibyl, jelene))\nforall x (Tailor(x, jelene) -> Electrify(jelene, sibyl))\nforall x (Lighter(x, jelene) -> Clarion(x))\nforall x (Tailor(x, sibyl) -> Dorian(sibyl))\nforall x (Tailor(x, sibyl) and Dorian(x) -> Electrify(sibyl, jelene))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and Lighter(x, sibyl) -> Lighter(sibyl, jelene))\nforall x (Clarion(x) -> Tailor(x, sibyl))\n\nnot Tailor(sibyl, jelene)\n\ntherefore Tailor(sibyl, jelene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The skip march the elna. The elna press the skip. The elna is truthful. If something coat the elna then it press the skip. If something march the skip and the skip march the elna then the elna press the skip. If something press the skip then the skip coat the elna. If something march the skip then it is truthful. If something press the elna then the elna is propellent. If something press the elna and it is propellent then the elna coat the skip. If something is truthful and it march the elna then the elna march the skip. If something is truthful then it press the elna. The elna press the elna.", "logic": "\nMarch(skip, elna)\nPress(elna, skip)\nTruthful(elna)\nforall x (Coat(x, elna) -> Press(x, skip))\nforall x (March(x, skip) and March(skip, elna) -> Press(elna, skip))\nforall x (Press(x, skip) -> Coat(skip, elna))\nforall x (March(x, skip) -> Truthful(x))\nforall x (Press(x, elna) -> Propellent(elna))\nforall x (Press(x, elna) and Propellent(x) -> Coat(elna, skip))\nforall x (Truthful(x) and March(x, elna) -> March(elna, skip))\nforall x (Truthful(x) -> Press(x, elna))\n\nPress(elna, elna)\n\nTruthful(elna) and forall x (Truthful(x) -> Press(x, elna)) -> therefore Press(elna, elna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The peyton tinker the bernetta. The bernetta boob the peyton. The bernetta is weekly. If something interlude the bernetta then it boob the peyton. If something tinker the peyton and the peyton tinker the bernetta then the bernetta boob the peyton. If something boob the peyton then the peyton interlude the bernetta. If something tinker the peyton then it is weekly. If something boob the bernetta then the bernetta is enervated. If something boob the bernetta and it is enervated then the bernetta interlude the peyton. If something is weekly and it tinker the bernetta then the bernetta tinker the peyton. If something is weekly then it boob the bernetta. The peyton does not like the bernetta.", "logic": "\nTinker(peyton, bernetta)\nBoob(bernetta, peyton)\nWeekly(bernetta)\nforall x (Interlude(x, bernetta) -> Boob(x, peyton))\nforall x (Tinker(x, peyton) and Tinker(peyton, bernetta) -> Boob(bernetta, peyton))\nforall x (Boob(x, peyton) -> Interlude(peyton, bernetta))\nforall x (Tinker(x, peyton) -> Weekly(x))\nforall x (Boob(x, bernetta) -> Enervated(bernetta))\nforall x (Boob(x, bernetta) and Enervated(x) -> Interlude(bernetta, peyton))\nforall x (Weekly(x) and Tinker(x, bernetta) -> Tinker(bernetta, peyton))\nforall x (Weekly(x) -> Boob(x, bernetta))\n\nnot Interlude(peyton, bernetta)\n\nBoob(bernetta, peyton) and forall x (Boob(x, peyton) -> Interlude(peyton, bernetta)) -> therefore Interlude(peyton, bernetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The kelila specialize the koressa. The koressa spirt the kelila. The koressa is consuming. If something calcimine the koressa then it spirt the kelila. If something specialize the kelila and the kelila specialize the koressa then the koressa spirt the kelila. If something spirt the kelila then the kelila calcimine the koressa. If something specialize the kelila then it is consuming. If something spirt the koressa then the koressa is rare. If something spirt the koressa and it is rare then the koressa calcimine the kelila. If something is consuming and it specialize the koressa then the koressa specialize the kelila. If something is consuming then it spirt the koressa. The koressa is rare.", "logic": "\nSpecialize(kelila, koressa)\nSpirt(koressa, kelila)\nConsuming(koressa)\nforall x (Calcimine(x, koressa) -> Spirt(x, kelila))\nforall x (Specialize(x, kelila) and Specialize(kelila, koressa) -> Spirt(koressa, kelila))\nforall x (Spirt(x, kelila) -> Calcimine(kelila, koressa))\nforall x (Specialize(x, kelila) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Spirt(x, koressa) -> Rare(koressa))\nforall x (Spirt(x, koressa) and Rare(x) -> Calcimine(koressa, kelila))\nforall x (Consuming(x) and Specialize(x, koressa) -> Specialize(koressa, kelila))\nforall x (Consuming(x) -> Spirt(x, koressa))\n\nRare(koressa)\n\nConsuming(koressa) and forall x (Consuming(x) -> Spirt(x, koressa)) -> therefore Spirt(koressa, koressa) Spirt(koressa, koressa) and forall x (Spirt(x, koressa) -> Rare(koressa)) -> therefore Rare(koressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The phillida shamble the kelci. The kelci march the phillida. The kelci is celestial. If something peel the kelci then it march the phillida. If something shamble the phillida and the phillida shamble the kelci then the kelci march the phillida. If something march the phillida then the phillida peel the kelci. If something shamble the phillida then it is celestial. If something march the kelci then the kelci is knockabout. If something march the kelci and it is knockabout then the kelci peel the phillida. If something is celestial and it shamble the kelci then the kelci shamble the phillida. If something is celestial then it march the kelci. The phillida does not chase the phillida.", "logic": "\nShamble(phillida, kelci)\nMarch(kelci, phillida)\nCelestial(kelci)\nforall x (Peel(x, kelci) -> March(x, phillida))\nforall x (Shamble(x, phillida) and Shamble(phillida, kelci) -> March(kelci, phillida))\nforall x (March(x, phillida) -> Peel(phillida, kelci))\nforall x (Shamble(x, phillida) -> Celestial(x))\nforall x (March(x, kelci) -> Knockabout(kelci))\nforall x (March(x, kelci) and Knockabout(x) -> Peel(kelci, phillida))\nforall x (Celestial(x) and Shamble(x, kelci) -> Shamble(kelci, phillida))\nforall x (Celestial(x) -> March(x, kelci))\n\nnot March(phillida, phillida)\n\nMarch(kelci, phillida) and forall x (March(x, phillida) -> Peel(phillida, kelci)) -> therefore Peel(phillida, kelci) Peel(phillida, kelci) and forall x (Peel(x, kelci) -> March(x, phillida)) -> therefore March(phillida, phillida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The matias reconvene the filip. The filip boss the matias. The filip is titular. If something permit the filip then it boss the matias. If something reconvene the matias and the matias reconvene the filip then the filip boss the matias. If something boss the matias then the matias permit the filip. If something reconvene the matias then it is titular. If something boss the filip then the filip is centroidal. If something boss the filip and it is centroidal then the filip permit the matias. If something is titular and it reconvene the filip then the filip reconvene the matias. If something is titular then it boss the filip. The filip permit the matias.", "logic": "\nReconvene(matias, filip)\nBoss(filip, matias)\nTitular(filip)\nforall x (Permit(x, filip) -> Boss(x, matias))\nforall x (Reconvene(x, matias) and Reconvene(matias, filip) -> Boss(filip, matias))\nforall x (Boss(x, matias) -> Permit(matias, filip))\nforall x (Reconvene(x, matias) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Boss(x, filip) -> Centroidal(filip))\nforall x (Boss(x, filip) and Centroidal(x) -> Permit(filip, matias))\nforall x (Titular(x) and Reconvene(x, filip) -> Reconvene(filip, matias))\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Boss(x, filip))\n\nPermit(filip, matias)\n\nTitular(filip) and forall x (Titular(x) -> Boss(x, filip)) -> therefore Boss(filip, filip) Titular(filip) and forall x (Titular(x) -> Boss(x, filip)) -> therefore Boss(filip, filip) Boss(filip, filip) and forall x (Boss(x, filip) -> Centroidal(filip)) -> therefore Centroidal(filip) Boss(filip, filip) and Centroidal(filip) and forall x (Boss(x, filip) and Centroidal(x) -> Permit(filip, matias)) -> therefore Permit(filip, matias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The dorotea weekend the xenia. The xenia tremble the dorotea. The xenia is ammino. If something accelerate the xenia then it tremble the dorotea. If something weekend the dorotea and the dorotea weekend the xenia then the xenia tremble the dorotea. If something tremble the dorotea then the dorotea accelerate the xenia. If something weekend the dorotea then it is ammino. If something tremble the xenia then the xenia is sunless. If something tremble the xenia and it is sunless then the xenia accelerate the dorotea. If something is ammino and it weekend the xenia then the xenia weekend the dorotea. If something is ammino then it tremble the xenia. The xenia does not like the dorotea.", "logic": "\nWeekend(dorotea, xenia)\nTremble(xenia, dorotea)\nAmmino(xenia)\nforall x (Accelerate(x, xenia) -> Tremble(x, dorotea))\nforall x (Weekend(x, dorotea) and Weekend(dorotea, xenia) -> Tremble(xenia, dorotea))\nforall x (Tremble(x, dorotea) -> Accelerate(dorotea, xenia))\nforall x (Weekend(x, dorotea) -> Ammino(x))\nforall x (Tremble(x, xenia) -> Sunless(xenia))\nforall x (Tremble(x, xenia) and Sunless(x) -> Accelerate(xenia, dorotea))\nforall x (Ammino(x) and Weekend(x, xenia) -> Weekend(xenia, dorotea))\nforall x (Ammino(x) -> Tremble(x, xenia))\n\nnot Accelerate(xenia, dorotea)\n\nAmmino(xenia) and forall x (Ammino(x) -> Tremble(x, xenia)) -> therefore Tremble(xenia, xenia) Ammino(xenia) and forall x (Ammino(x) -> Tremble(x, xenia)) -> therefore Tremble(xenia, xenia) Tremble(xenia, xenia) and forall x (Tremble(x, xenia) -> Sunless(xenia)) -> therefore Sunless(xenia) Tremble(xenia, xenia) and Sunless(xenia) and forall x (Tremble(x, xenia) and Sunless(x) -> Accelerate(xenia, dorotea)) -> therefore Accelerate(xenia, dorotea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The dorcas decoy the quincey. The quincey unlade the dorcas. The quincey is alterable. If something deprave the quincey then it unlade the dorcas. If something decoy the dorcas and the dorcas decoy the quincey then the quincey unlade the dorcas. If something unlade the dorcas then the dorcas deprave the quincey. If something decoy the dorcas then it is alterable. If something unlade the quincey then the quincey is precordial. If something unlade the quincey and it is precordial then the quincey deprave the dorcas. If something is alterable and it decoy the quincey then the quincey decoy the dorcas. If something is alterable then it unlade the quincey. The dorcas is not alterable.", "logic": "\nDecoy(dorcas, quincey)\nUnlade(quincey, dorcas)\nAlterable(quincey)\nforall x (Deprave(x, quincey) -> Unlade(x, dorcas))\nforall x (Decoy(x, dorcas) and Decoy(dorcas, quincey) -> Unlade(quincey, dorcas))\nforall x (Unlade(x, dorcas) -> Deprave(dorcas, quincey))\nforall x (Decoy(x, dorcas) -> Alterable(x))\nforall x (Unlade(x, quincey) -> Precordial(quincey))\nforall x (Unlade(x, quincey) and Precordial(x) -> Deprave(quincey, dorcas))\nforall x (Alterable(x) and Decoy(x, quincey) -> Decoy(quincey, dorcas))\nforall x (Alterable(x) -> Unlade(x, quincey))\n\nnot Alterable(dorcas)\n\nforall x (Decoy(x, dorcas) -> Alterable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The keren palisade the anni. The anni disinherit the keren. The anni is parabolic. If something unwind the anni then it disinherit the keren. If something palisade the keren and the keren palisade the anni then the anni disinherit the keren. If something disinherit the keren then the keren unwind the anni. If something palisade the keren then it is parabolic. If something disinherit the anni then the anni is derisory. If something disinherit the anni and it is derisory then the anni unwind the keren. If something is parabolic and it palisade the anni then the anni palisade the keren. If something is parabolic then it disinherit the anni. The anni palisade the keren.", "logic": "\nPalisade(keren, anni)\nDisinherit(anni, keren)\nParabolic(anni)\nforall x (Unwind(x, anni) -> Disinherit(x, keren))\nforall x (Palisade(x, keren) and Palisade(keren, anni) -> Disinherit(anni, keren))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, keren) -> Unwind(keren, anni))\nforall x (Palisade(x, keren) -> Parabolic(x))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, anni) -> Derisory(anni))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, anni) and Derisory(x) -> Unwind(anni, keren))\nforall x (Parabolic(x) and Palisade(x, anni) -> Palisade(anni, keren))\nforall x (Parabolic(x) -> Disinherit(x, anni))\n\nPalisade(anni, keren)\n\nforall x (Parabolic(x) and Palisade(x, anni) -> Palisade(anni, keren)) <- forall x (Palisade(x, keren) -> Parabolic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The jeremias agnize the taite. The taite crank the jeremias. The taite is taillike. If something sallow the taite then it crank the jeremias. If something agnize the jeremias and the jeremias agnize the taite then the taite crank the jeremias. If something crank the jeremias then the jeremias sallow the taite. If something agnize the jeremias then it is taillike. If something crank the taite then the taite is unrealized. If something crank the taite and it is unrealized then the taite sallow the jeremias. If something is taillike and it agnize the taite then the taite agnize the jeremias. If something is taillike then it crank the taite. The jeremias does not chase the taite.", "logic": "\nAgnize(jeremias, taite)\nCrank(taite, jeremias)\nTaillike(taite)\nforall x (Sallow(x, taite) -> Crank(x, jeremias))\nforall x (Agnize(x, jeremias) and Agnize(jeremias, taite) -> Crank(taite, jeremias))\nforall x (Crank(x, jeremias) -> Sallow(jeremias, taite))\nforall x (Agnize(x, jeremias) -> Taillike(x))\nforall x (Crank(x, taite) -> Unrealized(taite))\nforall x (Crank(x, taite) and Unrealized(x) -> Sallow(taite, jeremias))\nforall x (Taillike(x) and Agnize(x, taite) -> Agnize(taite, jeremias))\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Crank(x, taite))\n\nnot Crank(jeremias, taite)\n\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Crank(x, taite)) <- forall x (Agnize(x, jeremias) -> Taillike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The peggie bonderize the evaleen. The evaleen tusk the peggie. The evaleen is uncarved. If something topple the evaleen then it tusk the peggie. If something bonderize the peggie and the peggie bonderize the evaleen then the evaleen tusk the peggie. If something tusk the peggie then the peggie topple the evaleen. If something bonderize the peggie then it is uncarved. If something tusk the evaleen then the evaleen is subacute. If something tusk the evaleen and it is subacute then the evaleen topple the peggie. If something is uncarved and it bonderize the evaleen then the evaleen bonderize the peggie. If something is uncarved then it tusk the evaleen. The peggie is rough.", "logic": "\nBonderize(peggie, evaleen)\nTusk(evaleen, peggie)\nUncarved(evaleen)\nforall x (Topple(x, evaleen) -> Tusk(x, peggie))\nforall x (Bonderize(x, peggie) and Bonderize(peggie, evaleen) -> Tusk(evaleen, peggie))\nforall x (Tusk(x, peggie) -> Topple(peggie, evaleen))\nforall x (Bonderize(x, peggie) -> Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Tusk(x, evaleen) -> Subacute(evaleen))\nforall x (Tusk(x, evaleen) and Subacute(x) -> Topple(evaleen, peggie))\nforall x (Uncarved(x) and Bonderize(x, evaleen) -> Bonderize(evaleen, peggie))\nforall x (Uncarved(x) -> Tusk(x, evaleen))\n\nRough(peggie)\n\nRough(peggie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The adolphus discolor the kissee. The kissee foreordain the adolphus. The kissee is antsy. If something glass the kissee then it foreordain the adolphus. If something discolor the adolphus and the adolphus discolor the kissee then the kissee foreordain the adolphus. If something foreordain the adolphus then the adolphus glass the kissee. If something discolor the adolphus then it is antsy. If something foreordain the kissee then the kissee is placental. If something foreordain the kissee and it is placental then the kissee glass the adolphus. If something is antsy and it discolor the kissee then the kissee discolor the adolphus. If something is antsy then it foreordain the kissee. The kissee is not rough.", "logic": "\nDiscolor(adolphus, kissee)\nForeordain(kissee, adolphus)\nAntsy(kissee)\nforall x (Glass(x, kissee) -> Foreordain(x, adolphus))\nforall x (Discolor(x, adolphus) and Discolor(adolphus, kissee) -> Foreordain(kissee, adolphus))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, adolphus) -> Glass(adolphus, kissee))\nforall x (Discolor(x, adolphus) -> Antsy(x))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, kissee) -> Placental(kissee))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, kissee) and Placental(x) -> Glass(kissee, adolphus))\nforall x (Antsy(x) and Discolor(x, kissee) -> Discolor(kissee, adolphus))\nforall x (Antsy(x) -> Foreordain(x, kissee))\n\nnot Rough(kissee)\n\nnot Rough(kissee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The keil augur the maury. The maury explore the keil. The maury is portentous. If something ooze the maury then it explore the keil. If something augur the keil and the keil augur the maury then the maury explore the keil. If something explore the keil then the keil ooze the maury. If something augur the keil then it is portentous. If something explore the maury then the maury is supple. If something explore the maury and it is supple then the maury ooze the keil. If something is portentous and it augur the maury then the maury augur the keil. If something is portentous then it explore the maury. The keil is supple.", "logic": "\nAugur(keil, maury)\nExplore(maury, keil)\nPortentous(maury)\nforall x (Ooze(x, maury) -> Explore(x, keil))\nforall x (Augur(x, keil) and Augur(keil, maury) -> Explore(maury, keil))\nforall x (Explore(x, keil) -> Ooze(keil, maury))\nforall x (Augur(x, keil) -> Portentous(x))\nforall x (Explore(x, maury) -> Supple(maury))\nforall x (Explore(x, maury) and Supple(x) -> Ooze(maury, keil))\nforall x (Portentous(x) and Augur(x, maury) -> Augur(maury, keil))\nforall x (Portentous(x) -> Explore(x, maury))\n\nSupple(keil)\n\nSupple(keil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The wes putter the ewart. The ewart strike the wes. The ewart is slaty. If something trail the ewart then it strike the wes. If something putter the wes and the wes putter the ewart then the ewart strike the wes. If something strike the wes then the wes trail the ewart. If something putter the wes then it is slaty. If something strike the ewart then the ewart is exocentric. If something strike the ewart and it is exocentric then the ewart trail the wes. If something is slaty and it putter the ewart then the ewart putter the wes. If something is slaty then it strike the ewart. The wes is not blue.", "logic": "\nPutter(wes, ewart)\nStrike(ewart, wes)\nSlaty(ewart)\nforall x (Trail(x, ewart) -> Strike(x, wes))\nforall x (Putter(x, wes) and Putter(wes, ewart) -> Strike(ewart, wes))\nforall x (Strike(x, wes) -> Trail(wes, ewart))\nforall x (Putter(x, wes) -> Slaty(x))\nforall x (Strike(x, ewart) -> Exocentric(ewart))\nforall x (Strike(x, ewart) and Exocentric(x) -> Trail(ewart, wes))\nforall x (Slaty(x) and Putter(x, ewart) -> Putter(ewart, wes))\nforall x (Slaty(x) -> Strike(x, ewart))\n\nnot Blue(wes)\n\nnot Blue(wes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The demetria depress the englebart. The englebart drool the demetria. The englebart is nectarous. If something avoid the englebart then it drool the demetria. If something depress the demetria and the demetria depress the englebart then the englebart drool the demetria. If something drool the demetria then the demetria avoid the englebart. If something depress the demetria then it is nectarous. If something drool the englebart then the englebart is eurasian. If something drool the englebart and it is eurasian then the englebart avoid the demetria. If something is nectarous and it depress the englebart then the englebart depress the demetria. If something is nectarous then it drool the englebart. The englebart depress the englebart.", "logic": "\nDepress(demetria, englebart)\nDrool(englebart, demetria)\nNectarous(englebart)\nforall x (Avoid(x, englebart) -> Drool(x, demetria))\nforall x (Depress(x, demetria) and Depress(demetria, englebart) -> Drool(englebart, demetria))\nforall x (Drool(x, demetria) -> Avoid(demetria, englebart))\nforall x (Depress(x, demetria) -> Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Drool(x, englebart) -> Eurasian(englebart))\nforall x (Drool(x, englebart) and Eurasian(x) -> Avoid(englebart, demetria))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) and Depress(x, englebart) -> Depress(englebart, demetria))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Drool(x, englebart))\n\nDepress(englebart, englebart)\n\nDepress(englebart, englebart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-626"} {"premises": "The garrett is albuminous. If the garrett is soft and the garrett is lettered then the garrett is unsinkable. All youthful, albuminous things are soft. Nice, unsinkable things are soft. If something is soft and youthful then it is albuminous. Round, albuminous things are soft. If the garrett is albuminous and the garrett is youthful then the garrett is lettered. The garrett is albuminous.", "logic": "\nAlbuminous(garrett)\nSoft(garrett) and Lettered(garrett) -> Unsinkable(garrett)\nforall x (Youthful(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Youthful(x) and Unsinkable(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Soft(x) and Youthful(x) -> Albuminous(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Soft(x))\nAlbuminous(garrett) and Youthful(garrett) -> Lettered(garrett)\n\nAlbuminous(garrett)\n\ntherefore Albuminous(garrett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5029"} {"premises": "The willard is tottery. If the willard is tripinnate and the willard is defeated then the willard is trabeated. All lightproof, tottery things are tripinnate. Nice, trabeated things are tripinnate. If something is tripinnate and lightproof then it is tottery. Round, tottery things are tripinnate. If the willard is tottery and the willard is lightproof then the willard is defeated. The willard is not tottery.", "logic": "\nTottery(willard)\nTripinnate(willard) and Defeated(willard) -> Trabeated(willard)\nforall x (Lightproof(x) and Tottery(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) and Trabeated(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) and Lightproof(x) -> Tottery(x))\nforall x (Defeated(x) and Tottery(x) -> Tripinnate(x))\nTottery(willard) and Lightproof(willard) -> Defeated(willard)\n\nnot Tottery(willard)\n\ntherefore Tottery(willard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5029"} {"premises": "The steve is autoerotic. If the steve is ancient and the steve is unsettled then the steve is lousy. All nonbearing, autoerotic things are ancient. Nice, lousy things are ancient. If something is ancient and nonbearing then it is autoerotic. Round, autoerotic things are ancient. If the steve is autoerotic and the steve is nonbearing then the steve is unsettled. The steve is not unsettled.", "logic": "\nAutoerotic(steve)\nAncient(steve) and Unsettled(steve) -> Lousy(steve)\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) and Autoerotic(x) -> Ancient(x))\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) and Lousy(x) -> Ancient(x))\nforall x (Ancient(x) and Nonbearing(x) -> Autoerotic(x))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) and Autoerotic(x) -> Ancient(x))\nAutoerotic(steve) and Nonbearing(steve) -> Unsettled(steve)\n\nnot Unsettled(steve)\n\nAutoerotic(steve) and Nonbearing(steve) -> Unsettled(steve) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5029"} {"premises": "The stephana is pucka. If the stephana is affixial and the stephana is doubting then the stephana is bobtail. All negative, pucka things are affixial. Nice, bobtail things are affixial. If something is affixial and negative then it is pucka. Round, pucka things are affixial. If the stephana is pucka and the stephana is negative then the stephana is doubting. The stephana chases the stephana.", "logic": "\nPucka(stephana)\nAffixial(stephana) and Doubting(stephana) -> Bobtail(stephana)\nforall x (Negative(x) and Pucka(x) -> Affixial(x))\nforall x (Negative(x) and Bobtail(x) -> Affixial(x))\nforall x (Affixial(x) and Negative(x) -> Pucka(x))\nforall x (Doubting(x) and Pucka(x) -> Affixial(x))\nPucka(stephana) and Negative(stephana) -> Doubting(stephana)\n\nChases(stephana, stephana)\n\nChases(stephana, stephana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5029"} {"premises": "The tedda is sizeable. The tedda is brusque. The isadore is not ornate. The isadore is not sizeable. The isadore is brusque. The isadore pressurize the pail. The pail is sizeable. The pail abide the isadore. The pail attend the tedda. The marcello is brusque. If someone pressurize the pail then they see the isadore. If someone pressurize the isadore then the isadore does not see the tedda. If someone pressurize the tedda and they like the pail then the pail abide the isadore. If the isadore is roomy then the isadore abide the pail. If the tedda pressurize the isadore then the isadore does not see the marcello. If the marcello is roomy then the marcello abide the tedda. If someone abide the marcello then they need the isadore. If someone is brusque and they do not see the tedda then the tedda attend the pail. The tedda is brusque.", "logic": "\nSizeable(tedda)\nBrusque(tedda)\nnot Ornate(isadore)\nnot Sizeable(isadore)\nBrusque(isadore)\nPressurize(isadore, pail)\nSizeable(pail)\nAbide(pail, isadore)\nAttend(pail, tedda)\nBrusque(marcello)\nforall x (Pressurize(x, pail) -> Pressurize(x, isadore))\nforall x (Pressurize(x, isadore) -> not Pressurize(isadore, tedda))\nforall x (Pressurize(x, tedda) and Abide(x, pail) -> Abide(pail, isadore))\nRoomy(isadore) -> Abide(isadore, pail)\nPressurize(tedda, isadore) -> not Pressurize(isadore, marcello)\nRoomy(marcello) -> Abide(marcello, tedda)\nforall x (Abide(x, marcello) -> Attend(x, isadore))\nforall x (Brusque(x) and not Pressurize(x, tedda) -> Attend(tedda, pail))\n\nBrusque(tedda)\n\ntherefore Brusque(tedda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The tiena is reticulate. The tiena is mindful. The ethelyn is not acrid. The ethelyn is not reticulate. The ethelyn is mindful. The ethelyn commission the moria. The moria is reticulate. The moria eternalize the ethelyn. The moria drudge the tiena. The jobyna is mindful. If someone commission the moria then they see the ethelyn. If someone commission the ethelyn then the ethelyn does not see the tiena. If someone commission the tiena and they like the moria then the moria eternalize the ethelyn. If the ethelyn is smitten then the ethelyn eternalize the moria. If the tiena commission the ethelyn then the ethelyn does not see the jobyna. If the jobyna is smitten then the jobyna eternalize the tiena. If someone eternalize the jobyna then they need the ethelyn. If someone is mindful and they do not see the tiena then the tiena drudge the moria. The moria is not reticulate.", "logic": "\nReticulate(tiena)\nMindful(tiena)\nnot Acrid(ethelyn)\nnot Reticulate(ethelyn)\nMindful(ethelyn)\nCommission(ethelyn, moria)\nReticulate(moria)\nEternalize(moria, ethelyn)\nDrudge(moria, tiena)\nMindful(jobyna)\nforall x (Commission(x, moria) -> Commission(x, ethelyn))\nforall x (Commission(x, ethelyn) -> not Commission(ethelyn, tiena))\nforall x (Commission(x, tiena) and Eternalize(x, moria) -> Eternalize(moria, ethelyn))\nSmitten(ethelyn) -> Eternalize(ethelyn, moria)\nCommission(tiena, ethelyn) -> not Commission(ethelyn, jobyna)\nSmitten(jobyna) -> Eternalize(jobyna, tiena)\nforall x (Eternalize(x, jobyna) -> Drudge(x, ethelyn))\nforall x (Mindful(x) and not Commission(x, tiena) -> Drudge(tiena, moria))\n\nnot Reticulate(moria)\n\ntherefore Reticulate(moria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The odele is gyral. The odele is desiccated. The dietrich is not crinoid. The dietrich is not gyral. The dietrich is desiccated. The dietrich revere the sanders. The sanders is gyral. The sanders tote the dietrich. The sanders epilate the odele. The loella is desiccated. If someone revere the sanders then they see the dietrich. If someone revere the dietrich then the dietrich does not see the odele. If someone revere the odele and they like the sanders then the sanders tote the dietrich. If the dietrich is profitless then the dietrich tote the sanders. If the odele revere the dietrich then the dietrich does not see the loella. If the loella is profitless then the loella tote the odele. If someone tote the loella then they need the dietrich. If someone is desiccated and they do not see the odele then the odele epilate the sanders. The dietrich revere the dietrich.", "logic": "\nGyral(odele)\nDesiccated(odele)\nnot Crinoid(dietrich)\nnot Gyral(dietrich)\nDesiccated(dietrich)\nRevere(dietrich, sanders)\nGyral(sanders)\nTote(sanders, dietrich)\nEpilate(sanders, odele)\nDesiccated(loella)\nforall x (Revere(x, sanders) -> Revere(x, dietrich))\nforall x (Revere(x, dietrich) -> not Revere(dietrich, odele))\nforall x (Revere(x, odele) and Tote(x, sanders) -> Tote(sanders, dietrich))\nProfitless(dietrich) -> Tote(dietrich, sanders)\nRevere(odele, dietrich) -> not Revere(dietrich, loella)\nProfitless(loella) -> Tote(loella, odele)\nforall x (Tote(x, loella) -> Epilate(x, dietrich))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and not Revere(x, odele) -> Epilate(odele, sanders))\n\nRevere(dietrich, dietrich)\n\nRevere(dietrich, sanders) and forall x (Revere(x, sanders) -> Revere(x, dietrich)) -> therefore Revere(dietrich, dietrich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The huey is unedifying. The huey is iranian. The bobbie is not chancrous. The bobbie is not unedifying. The bobbie is iranian. The bobbie tint the elnar. The elnar is unedifying. The elnar beplaster the bobbie. The elnar deplumate the huey. The desiri is iranian. If someone tint the elnar then they see the bobbie. If someone tint the bobbie then the bobbie does not see the huey. If someone tint the huey and they like the elnar then the elnar beplaster the bobbie. If the bobbie is bulbous then the bobbie beplaster the elnar. If the huey tint the bobbie then the bobbie does not see the desiri. If the desiri is bulbous then the desiri beplaster the huey. If someone beplaster the desiri then they need the bobbie. If someone is iranian and they do not see the huey then the huey deplumate the elnar. The bobbie does not see the bobbie.", "logic": "\nUnedifying(huey)\nIranian(huey)\nnot Chancrous(bobbie)\nnot Unedifying(bobbie)\nIranian(bobbie)\nTint(bobbie, elnar)\nUnedifying(elnar)\nBeplaster(elnar, bobbie)\nDeplumate(elnar, huey)\nIranian(desiri)\nforall x (Tint(x, elnar) -> Tint(x, bobbie))\nforall x (Tint(x, bobbie) -> not Tint(bobbie, huey))\nforall x (Tint(x, huey) and Beplaster(x, elnar) -> Beplaster(elnar, bobbie))\nBulbous(bobbie) -> Beplaster(bobbie, elnar)\nTint(huey, bobbie) -> not Tint(bobbie, desiri)\nBulbous(desiri) -> Beplaster(desiri, huey)\nforall x (Beplaster(x, desiri) -> Deplumate(x, bobbie))\nforall x (Iranian(x) and not Tint(x, huey) -> Deplumate(huey, elnar))\n\nnot Tint(bobbie, bobbie)\n\nTint(bobbie, elnar) and forall x (Tint(x, elnar) -> Tint(x, bobbie)) -> therefore Tint(bobbie, bobbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The verne is slavonic. The verne is hesperian. The romola is not forbidden. The romola is not slavonic. The romola is hesperian. The romola keel the kit. The kit is slavonic. The kit troat the romola. The kit sparkle the verne. The denise is hesperian. If someone keel the kit then they see the romola. If someone keel the romola then the romola does not see the verne. If someone keel the verne and they like the kit then the kit troat the romola. If the romola is discoid then the romola troat the kit. If the verne keel the romola then the romola does not see the denise. If the denise is discoid then the denise troat the verne. If someone troat the denise then they need the romola. If someone is hesperian and they do not see the verne then the verne sparkle the kit. The romola does not see the verne.", "logic": "\nSlavonic(verne)\nHesperian(verne)\nnot Forbidden(romola)\nnot Slavonic(romola)\nHesperian(romola)\nKeel(romola, kit)\nSlavonic(kit)\nTroat(kit, romola)\nSparkle(kit, verne)\nHesperian(denise)\nforall x (Keel(x, kit) -> Keel(x, romola))\nforall x (Keel(x, romola) -> not Keel(romola, verne))\nforall x (Keel(x, verne) and Troat(x, kit) -> Troat(kit, romola))\nDiscoid(romola) -> Troat(romola, kit)\nKeel(verne, romola) -> not Keel(romola, denise)\nDiscoid(denise) -> Troat(denise, verne)\nforall x (Troat(x, denise) -> Sparkle(x, romola))\nforall x (Hesperian(x) and not Keel(x, verne) -> Sparkle(verne, kit))\n\nnot Keel(romola, verne)\n\nKeel(romola, kit) and forall x (Keel(x, kit) -> Keel(x, romola)) -> therefore Keel(romola, romola) Keel(romola, romola) and forall x (Keel(x, romola) -> not Keel(romola, verne)) -> therefore not Keel(romola, verne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The leyla is thumbed. The leyla is sober. The chelsie is not weakening. The chelsie is not thumbed. The chelsie is sober. The chelsie linearize the aguinaldo. The aguinaldo is thumbed. The aguinaldo prevail the chelsie. The aguinaldo smutch the leyla. The archibold is sober. If someone linearize the aguinaldo then they see the chelsie. If someone linearize the chelsie then the chelsie does not see the leyla. If someone linearize the leyla and they like the aguinaldo then the aguinaldo prevail the chelsie. If the chelsie is unarmed then the chelsie prevail the aguinaldo. If the leyla linearize the chelsie then the chelsie does not see the archibold. If the archibold is unarmed then the archibold prevail the leyla. If someone prevail the archibold then they need the chelsie. If someone is sober and they do not see the leyla then the leyla smutch the aguinaldo. The chelsie linearize the leyla.", "logic": "\nThumbed(leyla)\nSober(leyla)\nnot Weakening(chelsie)\nnot Thumbed(chelsie)\nSober(chelsie)\nLinearize(chelsie, aguinaldo)\nThumbed(aguinaldo)\nPrevail(aguinaldo, chelsie)\nSmutch(aguinaldo, leyla)\nSober(archibold)\nforall x (Linearize(x, aguinaldo) -> Linearize(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Linearize(x, chelsie) -> not Linearize(chelsie, leyla))\nforall x (Linearize(x, leyla) and Prevail(x, aguinaldo) -> Prevail(aguinaldo, chelsie))\nUnarmed(chelsie) -> Prevail(chelsie, aguinaldo)\nLinearize(leyla, chelsie) -> not Linearize(chelsie, archibold)\nUnarmed(archibold) -> Prevail(archibold, leyla)\nforall x (Prevail(x, archibold) -> Smutch(x, chelsie))\nforall x (Sober(x) and not Linearize(x, leyla) -> Smutch(leyla, aguinaldo))\n\nLinearize(chelsie, leyla)\n\nLinearize(chelsie, aguinaldo) and forall x (Linearize(x, aguinaldo) -> Linearize(x, chelsie)) -> therefore Linearize(chelsie, chelsie) Linearize(chelsie, chelsie) and forall x (Linearize(x, chelsie) -> not Linearize(chelsie, leyla)) -> therefore not Linearize(chelsie, leyla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The petrina is seated. The petrina is unpurified. The kally is not sold. The kally is not seated. The kally is unpurified. The kally homologise the bradford. The bradford is seated. The bradford sizz the kally. The bradford uncrate the petrina. The tadeas is unpurified. If someone homologise the bradford then they see the kally. If someone homologise the kally then the kally does not see the petrina. If someone homologise the petrina and they like the bradford then the bradford sizz the kally. If the kally is extempore then the kally sizz the bradford. If the petrina homologise the kally then the kally does not see the tadeas. If the tadeas is extempore then the tadeas sizz the petrina. If someone sizz the tadeas then they need the kally. If someone is unpurified and they do not see the petrina then the petrina uncrate the bradford. The petrina uncrate the bradford.", "logic": "\nSeated(petrina)\nUnpurified(petrina)\nnot Sold(kally)\nnot Seated(kally)\nUnpurified(kally)\nHomologise(kally, bradford)\nSeated(bradford)\nSizz(bradford, kally)\nUncrate(bradford, petrina)\nUnpurified(tadeas)\nforall x (Homologise(x, bradford) -> Homologise(x, kally))\nforall x (Homologise(x, kally) -> not Homologise(kally, petrina))\nforall x (Homologise(x, petrina) and Sizz(x, bradford) -> Sizz(bradford, kally))\nExtempore(kally) -> Sizz(kally, bradford)\nHomologise(petrina, kally) -> not Homologise(kally, tadeas)\nExtempore(tadeas) -> Sizz(tadeas, petrina)\nforall x (Sizz(x, tadeas) -> Uncrate(x, kally))\nforall x (Unpurified(x) and not Homologise(x, petrina) -> Uncrate(petrina, bradford))\n\nUncrate(petrina, bradford)\n\nHomologise(kally, bradford) and forall x (Homologise(x, bradford) -> Homologise(x, kally)) -> therefore Homologise(kally, kally) Homologise(kally, kally) and forall x (Homologise(x, kally) -> not Homologise(kally, petrina)) -> therefore not Homologise(kally, petrina) Unpurified(kally) and not Homologise(kally, petrina) and forall x (Unpurified(x) and not Homologise(x, petrina) -> Uncrate(petrina, bradford)) -> therefore Uncrate(petrina, bradford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The shelley is jesting. The shelley is centered. The duffy is not retiring. The duffy is not jesting. The duffy is centered. The duffy impede the elroy. The elroy is jesting. The elroy wattle the duffy. The elroy gibe the shelley. The marrissa is centered. If someone impede the elroy then they see the duffy. If someone impede the duffy then the duffy does not see the shelley. If someone impede the shelley and they like the elroy then the elroy wattle the duffy. If the duffy is blastular then the duffy wattle the elroy. If the shelley impede the duffy then the duffy does not see the marrissa. If the marrissa is blastular then the marrissa wattle the shelley. If someone wattle the marrissa then they need the duffy. If someone is centered and they do not see the shelley then the shelley gibe the elroy. The shelley does not need the elroy.", "logic": "\nJesting(shelley)\nCentered(shelley)\nnot Retiring(duffy)\nnot Jesting(duffy)\nCentered(duffy)\nImpede(duffy, elroy)\nJesting(elroy)\nWattle(elroy, duffy)\nGibe(elroy, shelley)\nCentered(marrissa)\nforall x (Impede(x, elroy) -> Impede(x, duffy))\nforall x (Impede(x, duffy) -> not Impede(duffy, shelley))\nforall x (Impede(x, shelley) and Wattle(x, elroy) -> Wattle(elroy, duffy))\nBlastular(duffy) -> Wattle(duffy, elroy)\nImpede(shelley, duffy) -> not Impede(duffy, marrissa)\nBlastular(marrissa) -> Wattle(marrissa, shelley)\nforall x (Wattle(x, marrissa) -> Gibe(x, duffy))\nforall x (Centered(x) and not Impede(x, shelley) -> Gibe(shelley, elroy))\n\nnot Gibe(shelley, elroy)\n\nImpede(duffy, elroy) and forall x (Impede(x, elroy) -> Impede(x, duffy)) -> therefore Impede(duffy, duffy) Impede(duffy, duffy) and forall x (Impede(x, duffy) -> not Impede(duffy, shelley)) -> therefore not Impede(duffy, shelley) Centered(duffy) and not Impede(duffy, shelley) and forall x (Centered(x) and not Impede(x, shelley) -> Gibe(shelley, elroy)) -> therefore Gibe(shelley, elroy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The leonerd is optimistic. The leonerd is igneous. The bernadina is not scrambled. The bernadina is not optimistic. The bernadina is igneous. The bernadina devise the cassy. The cassy is optimistic. The cassy disdain the bernadina. The cassy languish the leonerd. The lida is igneous. If someone devise the cassy then they see the bernadina. If someone devise the bernadina then the bernadina does not see the leonerd. If someone devise the leonerd and they like the cassy then the cassy disdain the bernadina. If the bernadina is homicidal then the bernadina disdain the cassy. If the leonerd devise the bernadina then the bernadina does not see the lida. If the lida is homicidal then the lida disdain the leonerd. If someone disdain the lida then they need the bernadina. If someone is igneous and they do not see the leonerd then the leonerd languish the cassy. The cassy does not see the bernadina.", "logic": "\nOptimistic(leonerd)\nIgneous(leonerd)\nnot Scrambled(bernadina)\nnot Optimistic(bernadina)\nIgneous(bernadina)\nDevise(bernadina, cassy)\nOptimistic(cassy)\nDisdain(cassy, bernadina)\nLanguish(cassy, leonerd)\nIgneous(lida)\nforall x (Devise(x, cassy) -> Devise(x, bernadina))\nforall x (Devise(x, bernadina) -> not Devise(bernadina, leonerd))\nforall x (Devise(x, leonerd) and Disdain(x, cassy) -> Disdain(cassy, bernadina))\nHomicidal(bernadina) -> Disdain(bernadina, cassy)\nDevise(leonerd, bernadina) -> not Devise(bernadina, lida)\nHomicidal(lida) -> Disdain(lida, leonerd)\nforall x (Disdain(x, lida) -> Languish(x, bernadina))\nforall x (Igneous(x) and not Devise(x, leonerd) -> Languish(leonerd, cassy))\n\nnot Devise(cassy, bernadina)\n\nforall x (Devise(x, cassy) -> Devise(x, bernadina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The susanna is seasoned. The susanna is dated. The chelsy is not taxpaying. The chelsy is not seasoned. The chelsy is dated. The chelsy schematize the marylou. The marylou is seasoned. The marylou eject the chelsy. The marylou accrue the susanna. The fowler is dated. If someone schematize the marylou then they see the chelsy. If someone schematize the chelsy then the chelsy does not see the susanna. If someone schematize the susanna and they like the marylou then the marylou eject the chelsy. If the chelsy is despoiled then the chelsy eject the marylou. If the susanna schematize the chelsy then the chelsy does not see the fowler. If the fowler is despoiled then the fowler eject the susanna. If someone eject the fowler then they need the chelsy. If someone is dated and they do not see the susanna then the susanna accrue the marylou. The marylou accrue the chelsy.", "logic": "\nSeasoned(susanna)\nDated(susanna)\nnot Taxpaying(chelsy)\nnot Seasoned(chelsy)\nDated(chelsy)\nSchematize(chelsy, marylou)\nSeasoned(marylou)\nEject(marylou, chelsy)\nAccrue(marylou, susanna)\nDated(fowler)\nforall x (Schematize(x, marylou) -> Schematize(x, chelsy))\nforall x (Schematize(x, chelsy) -> not Schematize(chelsy, susanna))\nforall x (Schematize(x, susanna) and Eject(x, marylou) -> Eject(marylou, chelsy))\nDespoiled(chelsy) -> Eject(chelsy, marylou)\nSchematize(susanna, chelsy) -> not Schematize(chelsy, fowler)\nDespoiled(fowler) -> Eject(fowler, susanna)\nforall x (Eject(x, fowler) -> Accrue(x, chelsy))\nforall x (Dated(x) and not Schematize(x, susanna) -> Accrue(susanna, marylou))\n\nAccrue(marylou, chelsy)\n\nforall x (Eject(x, fowler) -> Accrue(x, chelsy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The drea is pinched. The drea is evasive. The zolly is not unselected. The zolly is not pinched. The zolly is evasive. The zolly bewhisker the tammara. The tammara is pinched. The tammara citrate the zolly. The tammara shock the drea. The jayme is evasive. If someone bewhisker the tammara then they see the zolly. If someone bewhisker the zolly then the zolly does not see the drea. If someone bewhisker the drea and they like the tammara then the tammara citrate the zolly. If the zolly is acquired then the zolly citrate the tammara. If the drea bewhisker the zolly then the zolly does not see the jayme. If the jayme is acquired then the jayme citrate the drea. If someone citrate the jayme then they need the zolly. If someone is evasive and they do not see the drea then the drea shock the tammara. The zolly does not like the tammara.", "logic": "\nPinched(drea)\nEvasive(drea)\nnot Unselected(zolly)\nnot Pinched(zolly)\nEvasive(zolly)\nBewhisker(zolly, tammara)\nPinched(tammara)\nCitrate(tammara, zolly)\nShock(tammara, drea)\nEvasive(jayme)\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, tammara) -> Bewhisker(x, zolly))\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, zolly) -> not Bewhisker(zolly, drea))\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, drea) and Citrate(x, tammara) -> Citrate(tammara, zolly))\nAcquired(zolly) -> Citrate(zolly, tammara)\nBewhisker(drea, zolly) -> not Bewhisker(zolly, jayme)\nAcquired(jayme) -> Citrate(jayme, drea)\nforall x (Citrate(x, jayme) -> Shock(x, zolly))\nforall x (Evasive(x) and not Bewhisker(x, drea) -> Shock(drea, tammara))\n\nnot Citrate(zolly, tammara)\n\nAcquired(zolly) -> Citrate(zolly, tammara) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The matthew is tyrolese. The matthew is aboral. The janene is not benthonic. The janene is not tyrolese. The janene is aboral. The janene refuel the nanni. The nanni is tyrolese. The nanni mambo the janene. The nanni trudge the matthew. The giffie is aboral. If someone refuel the nanni then they see the janene. If someone refuel the janene then the janene does not see the matthew. If someone refuel the matthew and they like the nanni then the nanni mambo the janene. If the janene is unbordered then the janene mambo the nanni. If the matthew refuel the janene then the janene does not see the giffie. If the giffie is unbordered then the giffie mambo the matthew. If someone mambo the giffie then they need the janene. If someone is aboral and they do not see the matthew then the matthew trudge the nanni. The giffie refuel the janene.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(matthew)\nAboral(matthew)\nnot Benthonic(janene)\nnot Tyrolese(janene)\nAboral(janene)\nRefuel(janene, nanni)\nTyrolese(nanni)\nMambo(nanni, janene)\nTrudge(nanni, matthew)\nAboral(giffie)\nforall x (Refuel(x, nanni) -> Refuel(x, janene))\nforall x (Refuel(x, janene) -> not Refuel(janene, matthew))\nforall x (Refuel(x, matthew) and Mambo(x, nanni) -> Mambo(nanni, janene))\nUnbordered(janene) -> Mambo(janene, nanni)\nRefuel(matthew, janene) -> not Refuel(janene, giffie)\nUnbordered(giffie) -> Mambo(giffie, matthew)\nforall x (Mambo(x, giffie) -> Trudge(x, janene))\nforall x (Aboral(x) and not Refuel(x, matthew) -> Trudge(matthew, nanni))\n\nRefuel(giffie, janene)\n\nforall x (Refuel(x, nanni) -> Refuel(x, janene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The barthel is alabaster. The barthel is tenor. The kimmie is not cuttable. The kimmie is not alabaster. The kimmie is tenor. The kimmie face the stepha. The stepha is alabaster. The stepha blacktop the kimmie. The stepha redo the barthel. The enrique is tenor. If someone face the stepha then they see the kimmie. If someone face the kimmie then the kimmie does not see the barthel. If someone face the barthel and they like the stepha then the stepha blacktop the kimmie. If the kimmie is downscale then the kimmie blacktop the stepha. If the barthel face the kimmie then the kimmie does not see the enrique. If the enrique is downscale then the enrique blacktop the barthel. If someone blacktop the enrique then they need the kimmie. If someone is tenor and they do not see the barthel then the barthel redo the stepha. The barthel does not like the stepha.", "logic": "\nAlabaster(barthel)\nTenor(barthel)\nnot Cuttable(kimmie)\nnot Alabaster(kimmie)\nTenor(kimmie)\nFace(kimmie, stepha)\nAlabaster(stepha)\nBlacktop(stepha, kimmie)\nRedo(stepha, barthel)\nTenor(enrique)\nforall x (Face(x, stepha) -> Face(x, kimmie))\nforall x (Face(x, kimmie) -> not Face(kimmie, barthel))\nforall x (Face(x, barthel) and Blacktop(x, stepha) -> Blacktop(stepha, kimmie))\nDownscale(kimmie) -> Blacktop(kimmie, stepha)\nFace(barthel, kimmie) -> not Face(kimmie, enrique)\nDownscale(enrique) -> Blacktop(enrique, barthel)\nforall x (Blacktop(x, enrique) -> Redo(x, kimmie))\nforall x (Tenor(x) and not Face(x, barthel) -> Redo(barthel, stepha))\n\nnot Blacktop(barthel, stepha)\n\nnot Blacktop(barthel, stepha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The garcia is conjoined. The garcia is youthful. The francisca is not spikelike. The francisca is not conjoined. The francisca is youthful. The francisca betide the malory. The malory is conjoined. The malory etherise the francisca. The malory squire the garcia. The mona is youthful. If someone betide the malory then they see the francisca. If someone betide the francisca then the francisca does not see the garcia. If someone betide the garcia and they like the malory then the malory etherise the francisca. If the francisca is alimental then the francisca etherise the malory. If the garcia betide the francisca then the francisca does not see the mona. If the mona is alimental then the mona etherise the garcia. If someone etherise the mona then they need the francisca. If someone is youthful and they do not see the garcia then the garcia squire the malory. The francisca squire the malory.", "logic": "\nConjoined(garcia)\nYouthful(garcia)\nnot Spikelike(francisca)\nnot Conjoined(francisca)\nYouthful(francisca)\nBetide(francisca, malory)\nConjoined(malory)\nEtherise(malory, francisca)\nSquire(malory, garcia)\nYouthful(mona)\nforall x (Betide(x, malory) -> Betide(x, francisca))\nforall x (Betide(x, francisca) -> not Betide(francisca, garcia))\nforall x (Betide(x, garcia) and Etherise(x, malory) -> Etherise(malory, francisca))\nAlimental(francisca) -> Etherise(francisca, malory)\nBetide(garcia, francisca) -> not Betide(francisca, mona)\nAlimental(mona) -> Etherise(mona, garcia)\nforall x (Etherise(x, mona) -> Squire(x, francisca))\nforall x (Youthful(x) and not Betide(x, garcia) -> Squire(garcia, malory))\n\nSquire(francisca, malory)\n\nSquire(francisca, malory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The ginnifer is ilxx. The ginnifer is uniform. The bela is not depilatory. The bela is not ilxx. The bela is uniform. The bela needle the gillian. The gillian is ilxx. The gillian truckle the bela. The gillian misally the ginnifer. The brena is uniform. If someone needle the gillian then they see the bela. If someone needle the bela then the bela does not see the ginnifer. If someone needle the ginnifer and they like the gillian then the gillian truckle the bela. If the bela is venereal then the bela truckle the gillian. If the ginnifer needle the bela then the bela does not see the brena. If the brena is venereal then the brena truckle the ginnifer. If someone truckle the brena then they need the bela. If someone is uniform and they do not see the ginnifer then the ginnifer misally the gillian. The brena is not big.", "logic": "\nIlxx(ginnifer)\nUniform(ginnifer)\nnot Depilatory(bela)\nnot Ilxx(bela)\nUniform(bela)\nNeedle(bela, gillian)\nIlxx(gillian)\nTruckle(gillian, bela)\nMisally(gillian, ginnifer)\nUniform(brena)\nforall x (Needle(x, gillian) -> Needle(x, bela))\nforall x (Needle(x, bela) -> not Needle(bela, ginnifer))\nforall x (Needle(x, ginnifer) and Truckle(x, gillian) -> Truckle(gillian, bela))\nVenereal(bela) -> Truckle(bela, gillian)\nNeedle(ginnifer, bela) -> not Needle(bela, brena)\nVenereal(brena) -> Truckle(brena, ginnifer)\nforall x (Truckle(x, brena) -> Misally(x, bela))\nforall x (Uniform(x) and not Needle(x, ginnifer) -> Misally(ginnifer, gillian))\n\nnot Big(brena)\n\nnot Big(brena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The jerry is automated. The jerry is rural. The gwennie is not indurate. The gwennie is not automated. The gwennie is rural. The gwennie divest the paule. The paule is automated. The paule bifurcate the gwennie. The paule rally the jerry. The rosie is rural. If someone divest the paule then they see the gwennie. If someone divest the gwennie then the gwennie does not see the jerry. If someone divest the jerry and they like the paule then the paule bifurcate the gwennie. If the gwennie is rested then the gwennie bifurcate the paule. If the jerry divest the gwennie then the gwennie does not see the rosie. If the rosie is rested then the rosie bifurcate the jerry. If someone bifurcate the rosie then they need the gwennie. If someone is rural and they do not see the jerry then the jerry rally the paule. The rosie rally the jerry.", "logic": "\nAutomated(jerry)\nRural(jerry)\nnot Indurate(gwennie)\nnot Automated(gwennie)\nRural(gwennie)\nDivest(gwennie, paule)\nAutomated(paule)\nBifurcate(paule, gwennie)\nRally(paule, jerry)\nRural(rosie)\nforall x (Divest(x, paule) -> Divest(x, gwennie))\nforall x (Divest(x, gwennie) -> not Divest(gwennie, jerry))\nforall x (Divest(x, jerry) and Bifurcate(x, paule) -> Bifurcate(paule, gwennie))\nRested(gwennie) -> Bifurcate(gwennie, paule)\nDivest(jerry, gwennie) -> not Divest(gwennie, rosie)\nRested(rosie) -> Bifurcate(rosie, jerry)\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, rosie) -> Rally(x, gwennie))\nforall x (Rural(x) and not Divest(x, jerry) -> Rally(jerry, paule))\n\nRally(rosie, jerry)\n\nRally(rosie, jerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-970"} {"premises": "The caleb lyophilise the jermain. The caleb reorient the jermain. The caleb is splotched. The caleb is peculiar. The caleb is greenside. The caleb is chapfallen. The caleb is broadside. The caleb outguess the jermain. The jermain lyophilise the caleb. The jermain reorient the caleb. The jermain is splotched. The jermain is peculiar. The jermain is greenside. The jermain is chapfallen. The jermain is broadside. The jermain outguess the caleb. If someone lyophilise the jermain then the jermain reorient the caleb. If someone is splotched then they are peculiar. If the jermain lyophilise the caleb then the caleb outguess the jermain. If someone is peculiar then they visit the jermain. If someone reorient the caleb then they chase the jermain. If the caleb is chapfallen and the caleb reorient the jermain then the jermain outguess the caleb. If the caleb lyophilise the jermain and the caleb is greenside then the jermain is peculiar. If someone is greenside and chapfallen then they chase the jermain. The jermain is greenside.", "logic": "\nLyophilise(caleb, jermain)\nReorient(caleb, jermain)\nSplotched(caleb)\nPeculiar(caleb)\nGreenside(caleb)\nChapfallen(caleb)\nBroadside(caleb)\nOutguess(caleb, jermain)\nLyophilise(jermain, caleb)\nReorient(jermain, caleb)\nSplotched(jermain)\nPeculiar(jermain)\nGreenside(jermain)\nChapfallen(jermain)\nBroadside(jermain)\nOutguess(jermain, caleb)\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, jermain) -> Reorient(jermain, caleb))\nforall x (Splotched(x) -> Peculiar(x))\nLyophilise(jermain, caleb) -> Outguess(caleb, jermain)\nforall x (Peculiar(x) -> Outguess(x, jermain))\nforall x (Reorient(x, caleb) -> Lyophilise(x, jermain))\nChapfallen(caleb) and Reorient(caleb, jermain) -> Outguess(jermain, caleb)\nLyophilise(caleb, jermain) and Greenside(caleb) -> Peculiar(jermain)\nforall x (Greenside(x) and Chapfallen(x) -> Lyophilise(x, jermain))\n\nGreenside(jermain)\n\ntherefore Greenside(jermain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4127"} {"premises": "The claudie whine the lucilia. The claudie legalise the lucilia. The claudie is uncombined. The claudie is slumbrous. The claudie is capillary. The claudie is trembling. The claudie is cancerous. The claudie ostracize the lucilia. The lucilia whine the claudie. The lucilia legalise the claudie. The lucilia is uncombined. The lucilia is slumbrous. The lucilia is capillary. The lucilia is trembling. The lucilia is cancerous. The lucilia ostracize the claudie. If someone whine the lucilia then the lucilia legalise the claudie. If someone is uncombined then they are slumbrous. If the lucilia whine the claudie then the claudie ostracize the lucilia. If someone is slumbrous then they visit the lucilia. If someone legalise the claudie then they chase the lucilia. If the claudie is trembling and the claudie legalise the lucilia then the lucilia ostracize the claudie. If the claudie whine the lucilia and the claudie is capillary then the lucilia is slumbrous. If someone is capillary and trembling then they chase the lucilia. The claudie is not capillary.", "logic": "\nWhine(claudie, lucilia)\nLegalise(claudie, lucilia)\nUncombined(claudie)\nSlumbrous(claudie)\nCapillary(claudie)\nTrembling(claudie)\nCancerous(claudie)\nOstracize(claudie, lucilia)\nWhine(lucilia, claudie)\nLegalise(lucilia, claudie)\nUncombined(lucilia)\nSlumbrous(lucilia)\nCapillary(lucilia)\nTrembling(lucilia)\nCancerous(lucilia)\nOstracize(lucilia, claudie)\nforall x (Whine(x, lucilia) -> Legalise(lucilia, claudie))\nforall x (Uncombined(x) -> Slumbrous(x))\nWhine(lucilia, claudie) -> Ostracize(claudie, lucilia)\nforall x (Slumbrous(x) -> Ostracize(x, lucilia))\nforall x (Legalise(x, claudie) -> Whine(x, lucilia))\nTrembling(claudie) and Legalise(claudie, lucilia) -> Ostracize(lucilia, claudie)\nWhine(claudie, lucilia) and Capillary(claudie) -> Slumbrous(lucilia)\nforall x (Capillary(x) and Trembling(x) -> Whine(x, lucilia))\n\nnot Capillary(claudie)\n\ntherefore Capillary(claudie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4127"} {"premises": "The harv happen the shaylyn. The harv outstay the shaylyn. The harv is tangential. The harv is detected. The harv is palpatory. The harv is taxing. The harv is bantoid. The harv cart the shaylyn. The shaylyn happen the harv. The shaylyn outstay the harv. The shaylyn is tangential. The shaylyn is detected. The shaylyn is palpatory. The shaylyn is taxing. The shaylyn is bantoid. The shaylyn cart the harv. If someone happen the shaylyn then the shaylyn outstay the harv. If someone is tangential then they are detected. If the shaylyn happen the harv then the harv cart the shaylyn. If someone is detected then they visit the shaylyn. If someone outstay the harv then they chase the shaylyn. If the harv is taxing and the harv outstay the shaylyn then the shaylyn cart the harv. If the harv happen the shaylyn and the harv is palpatory then the shaylyn is detected. If someone is palpatory and taxing then they chase the shaylyn. The harv does not visit the harv.", "logic": "\nHappen(harv, shaylyn)\nOutstay(harv, shaylyn)\nTangential(harv)\nDetected(harv)\nPalpatory(harv)\nTaxing(harv)\nBantoid(harv)\nCart(harv, shaylyn)\nHappen(shaylyn, harv)\nOutstay(shaylyn, harv)\nTangential(shaylyn)\nDetected(shaylyn)\nPalpatory(shaylyn)\nTaxing(shaylyn)\nBantoid(shaylyn)\nCart(shaylyn, harv)\nforall x (Happen(x, shaylyn) -> Outstay(shaylyn, harv))\nforall x (Tangential(x) -> Detected(x))\nHappen(shaylyn, harv) -> Cart(harv, shaylyn)\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Cart(x, shaylyn))\nforall x (Outstay(x, harv) -> Happen(x, shaylyn))\nTaxing(harv) and Outstay(harv, shaylyn) -> Cart(shaylyn, harv)\nHappen(harv, shaylyn) and Palpatory(harv) -> Detected(shaylyn)\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Taxing(x) -> Happen(x, shaylyn))\n\nnot Cart(harv, harv)\n\nnot Cart(harv, harv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4127"} {"premises": "The eva multiply the ailee. The eva garrotte the ailee. The eva is northern. The eva is hulky. The eva is wrinkled. The eva is subtropic. The eva is noncrucial. The eva kidnap the ailee. The ailee multiply the eva. The ailee garrotte the eva. The ailee is northern. The ailee is hulky. The ailee is wrinkled. The ailee is subtropic. The ailee is noncrucial. The ailee kidnap the eva. If someone multiply the ailee then the ailee garrotte the eva. If someone is northern then they are hulky. If the ailee multiply the eva then the eva kidnap the ailee. If someone is hulky then they visit the ailee. If someone garrotte the eva then they chase the ailee. If the eva is subtropic and the eva garrotte the ailee then the ailee kidnap the eva. If the eva multiply the ailee and the eva is wrinkled then the ailee is hulky. If someone is wrinkled and subtropic then they chase the ailee. The eva multiply the eva.", "logic": "\nMultiply(eva, ailee)\nGarrotte(eva, ailee)\nNorthern(eva)\nHulky(eva)\nWrinkled(eva)\nSubtropic(eva)\nNoncrucial(eva)\nKidnap(eva, ailee)\nMultiply(ailee, eva)\nGarrotte(ailee, eva)\nNorthern(ailee)\nHulky(ailee)\nWrinkled(ailee)\nSubtropic(ailee)\nNoncrucial(ailee)\nKidnap(ailee, eva)\nforall x (Multiply(x, ailee) -> Garrotte(ailee, eva))\nforall x (Northern(x) -> Hulky(x))\nMultiply(ailee, eva) -> Kidnap(eva, ailee)\nforall x (Hulky(x) -> Kidnap(x, ailee))\nforall x (Garrotte(x, eva) -> Multiply(x, ailee))\nSubtropic(eva) and Garrotte(eva, ailee) -> Kidnap(ailee, eva)\nMultiply(eva, ailee) and Wrinkled(eva) -> Hulky(ailee)\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) and Subtropic(x) -> Multiply(x, ailee))\n\nMultiply(eva, eva)\n\nMultiply(eva, eva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4127"} {"premises": "Ibrahim is monaural. Ibrahim is solved. Clifton is duplicate. All monaural people are stimulated. Blue people are solved. Ibrahim is solved.", "logic": "\nMonaural(ibrahim)\nSolved(ibrahim)\nDuplicate(clifton)\nforall x (Monaural(x) -> Stimulated(x))\nforall x (Monaural(x) -> Solved(x))\n\nSolved(ibrahim)\n\ntherefore Solved(ibrahim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Elise is abeyant. Elise is disturbed. Dyna is unordered. All abeyant people are larboard. Blue people are disturbed. Elise is not disturbed.", "logic": "\nAbeyant(elise)\nDisturbed(elise)\nUnordered(dyna)\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Larboard(x))\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Disturbed(x))\n\nnot Disturbed(elise)\n\ntherefore Disturbed(elise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Sapphire is consoling. Sapphire is unlocated. Gweneth is imaginable. All consoling people are ravishing. Blue people are unlocated. Sapphire is ravishing.", "logic": "\nConsoling(sapphire)\nUnlocated(sapphire)\nImaginable(gweneth)\nforall x (Consoling(x) -> Ravishing(x))\nforall x (Consoling(x) -> Unlocated(x))\n\nRavishing(sapphire)\n\nConsoling(sapphire) and forall x (Consoling(x) -> Ravishing(x)) -> therefore Ravishing(sapphire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Amandie is prepared. Amandie is tendinous. Han is pivotal. All prepared people are maddening. Blue people are tendinous. Amandie is not maddening.", "logic": "\nPrepared(amandie)\nTendinous(amandie)\nPivotal(han)\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Maddening(x))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Tendinous(x))\n\nnot Maddening(amandie)\n\nPrepared(amandie) and forall x (Prepared(x) -> Maddening(x)) -> therefore Maddening(amandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Terry is lxxxiv. Terry is scientific. Caro is starlike. All lxxxiv people are doleful. Blue people are scientific. Caro is not doleful.", "logic": "\nLxxxiv(terry)\nScientific(terry)\nStarlike(caro)\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) -> Scientific(x))\n\nnot Doleful(caro)\n\nforall x (Lxxxiv(x) -> Doleful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Thebault is torn. Thebault is dozy. Jeanna is metameric. All torn people are gastric. Blue people are dozy. Jeanna is dozy.", "logic": "\nTorn(thebault)\nDozy(thebault)\nMetameric(jeanna)\nforall x (Torn(x) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Torn(x) -> Dozy(x))\n\nDozy(jeanna)\n\nforall x (Torn(x) -> Dozy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Loise is revokable. Loise is scurrilous. Lance is fisheye. All revokable people are inelegant. Blue people are scurrilous. Loise is not smart.", "logic": "\nRevokable(loise)\nScurrilous(loise)\nFisheye(lance)\nforall x (Revokable(x) -> Inelegant(x))\nforall x (Revokable(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\n\nnot Smart(loise)\n\nnot Smart(loise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Sadie is unsymbolic. Sadie is nihilistic. Cathrine is maverick. All unsymbolic people are rootbound. Blue people are nihilistic. Cathrine is unsymbolic.", "logic": "\nUnsymbolic(sadie)\nNihilistic(sadie)\nMaverick(cathrine)\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Rootbound(x))\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Nihilistic(x))\n\nUnsymbolic(cathrine)\n\nUnsymbolic(cathrine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-807"} {"premises": "Horatia is unoriginal. Horatia is plumy. Marcel is not plumy. Marcel is not incurvate. Beverly is required. Beverly is hooklike. Beverly is not incurvate. All cauline things are required. If Marcel is not incurvate then Marcel is cauline. All required things are hooklike. Beverly is hooklike.", "logic": "\nUnoriginal(horatia)\nPlumy(horatia)\nnot Plumy(marcel)\nnot Incurvate(marcel)\nRequired(beverly)\nHooklike(beverly)\nnot Incurvate(beverly)\nforall x (Cauline(x) -> Required(x))\nnot Incurvate(marcel) -> Cauline(marcel)\nforall x (Required(x) -> Hooklike(x))\n\nHooklike(beverly)\n\ntherefore Hooklike(beverly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Nicol is chesty. Nicol is smug. Davine is not smug. Davine is not recusant. Bernita is exhausting. Bernita is precursory. Bernita is not recusant. All educative things are exhausting. If Davine is not recusant then Davine is educative. All exhausting things are precursory. Bernita is recusant.", "logic": "\nChesty(nicol)\nSmug(nicol)\nnot Smug(davine)\nnot Recusant(davine)\nExhausting(bernita)\nPrecursory(bernita)\nnot Recusant(bernita)\nforall x (Educative(x) -> Exhausting(x))\nnot Recusant(davine) -> Educative(davine)\nforall x (Exhausting(x) -> Precursory(x))\n\nRecusant(bernita)\n\ntherefore not Recusant(bernita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Samantha is centrist. Samantha is peccant. Renae is not peccant. Renae is not bifoliate. Dagmar is medium. Dagmar is swift. Dagmar is not bifoliate. All cometic things are medium. If Renae is not bifoliate then Renae is cometic. All medium things are swift. Renae is cometic.", "logic": "\nCentrist(samantha)\nPeccant(samantha)\nnot Peccant(renae)\nnot Bifoliate(renae)\nMedium(dagmar)\nSwift(dagmar)\nnot Bifoliate(dagmar)\nforall x (Cometic(x) -> Medium(x))\nnot Bifoliate(renae) -> Cometic(renae)\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Swift(x))\n\nCometic(renae)\n\nnot Bifoliate(renae) and not Bifoliate(renae) -> Cometic(renae) -> therefore Cometic(renae)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Joyce is composite. Joyce is tendinous. Rodge is not tendinous. Rodge is not cranky. Candide is daughterly. Candide is defoliated. Candide is not cranky. All perineal things are daughterly. If Rodge is not cranky then Rodge is perineal. All daughterly things are defoliated. Rodge is not perineal.", "logic": "\nComposite(joyce)\nTendinous(joyce)\nnot Tendinous(rodge)\nnot Cranky(rodge)\nDaughterly(candide)\nDefoliated(candide)\nnot Cranky(candide)\nforall x (Perineal(x) -> Daughterly(x))\nnot Cranky(rodge) -> Perineal(rodge)\nforall x (Daughterly(x) -> Defoliated(x))\n\nnot Perineal(rodge)\n\nnot Cranky(rodge) and not Cranky(rodge) -> Perineal(rodge) -> therefore Perineal(rodge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Gabbie is testate. Gabbie is furthest. May is not furthest. May is not cloudlike. Phil is serpentine. Phil is broadleaf. Phil is not cloudlike. All undesiring things are serpentine. If May is not cloudlike then May is undesiring. All serpentine things are broadleaf. May is serpentine.", "logic": "\nTestate(gabbie)\nFurthest(gabbie)\nnot Furthest(may)\nnot Cloudlike(may)\nSerpentine(phil)\nBroadleaf(phil)\nnot Cloudlike(phil)\nforall x (Undesiring(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nnot Cloudlike(may) -> Undesiring(may)\nforall x (Serpentine(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\n\nSerpentine(may)\n\nnot Cloudlike(may) and not Cloudlike(may) -> Undesiring(may) -> therefore Undesiring(may) Undesiring(may) and forall x (Undesiring(x) -> Serpentine(x)) -> therefore Serpentine(may)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Merlin is aneurysmal. Merlin is unleavened. Theresina is not unleavened. Theresina is not ovate. Bren is gloveless. Bren is pernickety. Bren is not ovate. All inveterate things are gloveless. If Theresina is not ovate then Theresina is inveterate. All gloveless things are pernickety. Theresina is not gloveless.", "logic": "\nAneurysmal(merlin)\nUnleavened(merlin)\nnot Unleavened(theresina)\nnot Ovate(theresina)\nGloveless(bren)\nPernickety(bren)\nnot Ovate(bren)\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Gloveless(x))\nnot Ovate(theresina) -> Inveterate(theresina)\nforall x (Gloveless(x) -> Pernickety(x))\n\nnot Gloveless(theresina)\n\nnot Ovate(theresina) and not Ovate(theresina) -> Inveterate(theresina) -> therefore Inveterate(theresina) Inveterate(theresina) and forall x (Inveterate(x) -> Gloveless(x)) -> therefore Gloveless(theresina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Kimberli is worsening. Kimberli is viable. Adaline is not viable. Adaline is not palatine. Lonna is steady. Lonna is scholastic. Lonna is not palatine. All preferred things are steady. If Adaline is not palatine then Adaline is preferred. All steady things are scholastic. Adaline is scholastic.", "logic": "\nWorsening(kimberli)\nViable(kimberli)\nnot Viable(adaline)\nnot Palatine(adaline)\nSteady(lonna)\nScholastic(lonna)\nnot Palatine(lonna)\nforall x (Preferred(x) -> Steady(x))\nnot Palatine(adaline) -> Preferred(adaline)\nforall x (Steady(x) -> Scholastic(x))\n\nScholastic(adaline)\n\nnot Palatine(adaline) and not Palatine(adaline) -> Preferred(adaline) -> therefore Preferred(adaline) Preferred(adaline) and forall x (Preferred(x) -> Steady(x)) -> therefore Steady(adaline) Steady(adaline) and forall x (Steady(x) -> Scholastic(x)) -> therefore Scholastic(adaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Marchelle is charming. Marchelle is compliant. Dorette is not compliant. Dorette is not preclusive. Chantalle is nordic. Chantalle is unpotted. Chantalle is not preclusive. All inharmonic things are nordic. If Dorette is not preclusive then Dorette is inharmonic. All nordic things are unpotted. Dorette is not unpotted.", "logic": "\nCharming(marchelle)\nCompliant(marchelle)\nnot Compliant(dorette)\nnot Preclusive(dorette)\nNordic(chantalle)\nUnpotted(chantalle)\nnot Preclusive(chantalle)\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Nordic(x))\nnot Preclusive(dorette) -> Inharmonic(dorette)\nforall x (Nordic(x) -> Unpotted(x))\n\nnot Unpotted(dorette)\n\nnot Preclusive(dorette) and not Preclusive(dorette) -> Inharmonic(dorette) -> therefore Inharmonic(dorette) Inharmonic(dorette) and forall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Nordic(x)) -> therefore Nordic(dorette) Nordic(dorette) and forall x (Nordic(x) -> Unpotted(x)) -> therefore Unpotted(dorette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Lewis is acrogenic. Lewis is ocular. Pietra is not ocular. Pietra is not tactless. Michail is borderline. Michail is redheaded. Michail is not tactless. All brachial things are borderline. If Pietra is not tactless then Pietra is brachial. All borderline things are redheaded. Lewis is not borderline.", "logic": "\nAcrogenic(lewis)\nOcular(lewis)\nnot Ocular(pietra)\nnot Tactless(pietra)\nBorderline(michail)\nRedheaded(michail)\nnot Tactless(michail)\nforall x (Brachial(x) -> Borderline(x))\nnot Tactless(pietra) -> Brachial(pietra)\nforall x (Borderline(x) -> Redheaded(x))\n\nnot Borderline(lewis)\n\nforall x (Brachial(x) -> Borderline(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Addis is sanctified. Addis is scorching. Corly is not scorching. Corly is not buckram. Maryanne is extricable. Maryanne is sabahan. Maryanne is not buckram. All viviparous things are extricable. If Corly is not buckram then Corly is viviparous. All extricable things are sabahan. Addis is sabahan.", "logic": "\nSanctified(addis)\nScorching(addis)\nnot Scorching(corly)\nnot Buckram(corly)\nExtricable(maryanne)\nSabahan(maryanne)\nnot Buckram(maryanne)\nforall x (Viviparous(x) -> Extricable(x))\nnot Buckram(corly) -> Viviparous(corly)\nforall x (Extricable(x) -> Sabahan(x))\n\nSabahan(addis)\n\nforall x (Extricable(x) -> Sabahan(x)) <- forall x (Viviparous(x) -> Extricable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Idelle is garish. Idelle is anaerobic. Crawford is not anaerobic. Crawford is not politic. Karrie is dopey. Karrie is braless. Karrie is not politic. All citywide things are dopey. If Crawford is not politic then Crawford is citywide. All dopey things are braless. Karrie is not anaerobic.", "logic": "\nGarish(idelle)\nAnaerobic(idelle)\nnot Anaerobic(crawford)\nnot Politic(crawford)\nDopey(karrie)\nBraless(karrie)\nnot Politic(karrie)\nforall x (Citywide(x) -> Dopey(x))\nnot Politic(crawford) -> Citywide(crawford)\nforall x (Dopey(x) -> Braless(x))\n\nnot Anaerobic(karrie)\n\nnot Anaerobic(karrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Connie is petty. Connie is treasonous. Fanchette is not treasonous. Fanchette is not agronomic. Anna is tendinous. Anna is encased. Anna is not agronomic. All pediatric things are tendinous. If Fanchette is not agronomic then Fanchette is pediatric. All tendinous things are encased. Anna is petty.", "logic": "\nPetty(connie)\nTreasonous(connie)\nnot Treasonous(fanchette)\nnot Agronomic(fanchette)\nTendinous(anna)\nEncased(anna)\nnot Agronomic(anna)\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Tendinous(x))\nnot Agronomic(fanchette) -> Pediatric(fanchette)\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> Encased(x))\n\nPetty(anna)\n\nPetty(anna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Jessalin is spouting. Jessalin is bulimic. Rik is not bulimic. Rik is not boxy. Horst is nepali. Horst is contracted. Horst is not boxy. All uniate things are nepali. If Rik is not boxy then Rik is uniate. All nepali things are contracted. Horst is not young.", "logic": "\nSpouting(jessalin)\nBulimic(jessalin)\nnot Bulimic(rik)\nnot Boxy(rik)\nNepali(horst)\nContracted(horst)\nnot Boxy(horst)\nforall x (Uniate(x) -> Nepali(x))\nnot Boxy(rik) -> Uniate(rik)\nforall x (Nepali(x) -> Contracted(x))\n\nnot Young(horst)\n\nnot Young(horst) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Heath is hassidic. Heath is semitropic. Trude is not semitropic. Trude is not misleading. Augustina is xciv. Augustina is masonic. Augustina is not misleading. All unvigilant things are xciv. If Trude is not misleading then Trude is unvigilant. All xciv things are masonic. Heath is unvigilant.", "logic": "\nHassidic(heath)\nSemitropic(heath)\nnot Semitropic(trude)\nnot Misleading(trude)\nXciv(augustina)\nMasonic(augustina)\nnot Misleading(augustina)\nforall x (Unvigilant(x) -> Xciv(x))\nnot Misleading(trude) -> Unvigilant(trude)\nforall x (Xciv(x) -> Masonic(x))\n\nUnvigilant(heath)\n\nUnvigilant(heath) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Emalia is ranked. Emalia is unbleached. Shoshie is not unbleached. Shoshie is not cordless. Alister is politic. Alister is piggy. Alister is not cordless. All indocile things are politic. If Shoshie is not cordless then Shoshie is indocile. All politic things are piggy. Shoshie is not young.", "logic": "\nRanked(emalia)\nUnbleached(emalia)\nnot Unbleached(shoshie)\nnot Cordless(shoshie)\nPolitic(alister)\nPiggy(alister)\nnot Cordless(alister)\nforall x (Indocile(x) -> Politic(x))\nnot Cordless(shoshie) -> Indocile(shoshie)\nforall x (Politic(x) -> Piggy(x))\n\nnot Young(shoshie)\n\nnot Young(shoshie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "Madelene is glistering. Madelene is bearish. Tuckie is not bearish. Tuckie is not stung. Kimmie is seamy. Kimmie is adulterous. Kimmie is not stung. All comal things are seamy. If Tuckie is not stung then Tuckie is comal. All seamy things are adulterous. Madelene is stung.", "logic": "\nGlistering(madelene)\nBearish(madelene)\nnot Bearish(tuckie)\nnot Stung(tuckie)\nSeamy(kimmie)\nAdulterous(kimmie)\nnot Stung(kimmie)\nforall x (Comal(x) -> Seamy(x))\nnot Stung(tuckie) -> Comal(tuckie)\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> Adulterous(x))\n\nStung(madelene)\n\nStung(madelene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The lilias is medicinal. The lilias lighten the rica. The eba separate the lilias. The eba lighten the lilias. The eba lighten the rica. The eba neglect the rica. The rica lighten the eba. If something neglect the eba then the eba is wainscoted. If something is capsulate then it separate the rica. If something lighten the eba then it lighten the rica. If something is wainscoted then it neglect the lilias. If the lilias neglect the eba then the lilias is medicinal. If something is fungal then it neglect the eba. If something lighten the rica then it is capsulate. If something neglect the rica then the rica separate the eba. The rica lighten the eba.", "logic": "\nMedicinal(lilias)\nLighten(lilias, rica)\nSeparate(eba, lilias)\nLighten(eba, lilias)\nLighten(eba, rica)\nNeglect(eba, rica)\nLighten(rica, eba)\nforall x (Neglect(x, eba) -> Wainscoted(eba))\nforall x (Capsulate(x) -> Separate(x, rica))\nforall x (Lighten(x, eba) -> Lighten(x, rica))\nforall x (Wainscoted(x) -> Neglect(x, lilias))\nNeglect(lilias, eba) -> Medicinal(lilias)\nforall x (Fungal(x) -> Neglect(x, eba))\nforall x (Lighten(x, rica) -> Capsulate(x))\nforall x (Neglect(x, rica) -> Separate(rica, eba))\n\nLighten(rica, eba)\n\ntherefore Lighten(rica, eba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The adiana is unwomanly. The adiana hurry the cyb. The sondra chew the adiana. The sondra hurry the adiana. The sondra hurry the cyb. The sondra antiquate the cyb. The cyb hurry the sondra. If something antiquate the sondra then the sondra is stark. If something is wanton then it chew the cyb. If something hurry the sondra then it hurry the cyb. If something is stark then it antiquate the adiana. If the adiana antiquate the sondra then the adiana is unwomanly. If something is unpointed then it antiquate the sondra. If something hurry the cyb then it is wanton. If something antiquate the cyb then the cyb chew the sondra. The sondra does not eat the adiana.", "logic": "\nUnwomanly(adiana)\nHurry(adiana, cyb)\nChew(sondra, adiana)\nHurry(sondra, adiana)\nHurry(sondra, cyb)\nAntiquate(sondra, cyb)\nHurry(cyb, sondra)\nforall x (Antiquate(x, sondra) -> Stark(sondra))\nforall x (Wanton(x) -> Chew(x, cyb))\nforall x (Hurry(x, sondra) -> Hurry(x, cyb))\nforall x (Stark(x) -> Antiquate(x, adiana))\nAntiquate(adiana, sondra) -> Unwomanly(adiana)\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Antiquate(x, sondra))\nforall x (Hurry(x, cyb) -> Wanton(x))\nforall x (Antiquate(x, cyb) -> Chew(cyb, sondra))\n\nnot Chew(sondra, adiana)\n\ntherefore Chew(sondra, adiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The nicoline is straining. The nicoline hound the andreana. The brenna anastomose the nicoline. The brenna hound the nicoline. The brenna hound the andreana. The brenna murk the andreana. The andreana hound the brenna. If something murk the brenna then the brenna is undying. If something is orienting then it anastomose the andreana. If something hound the brenna then it hound the andreana. If something is undying then it murk the nicoline. If the nicoline murk the brenna then the nicoline is straining. If something is boundless then it murk the brenna. If something hound the andreana then it is orienting. If something murk the andreana then the andreana anastomose the brenna. The nicoline is orienting.", "logic": "\nStraining(nicoline)\nHound(nicoline, andreana)\nAnastomose(brenna, nicoline)\nHound(brenna, nicoline)\nHound(brenna, andreana)\nMurk(brenna, andreana)\nHound(andreana, brenna)\nforall x (Murk(x, brenna) -> Undying(brenna))\nforall x (Orienting(x) -> Anastomose(x, andreana))\nforall x (Hound(x, brenna) -> Hound(x, andreana))\nforall x (Undying(x) -> Murk(x, nicoline))\nMurk(nicoline, brenna) -> Straining(nicoline)\nforall x (Boundless(x) -> Murk(x, brenna))\nforall x (Hound(x, andreana) -> Orienting(x))\nforall x (Murk(x, andreana) -> Anastomose(andreana, brenna))\n\nOrienting(nicoline)\n\nHound(nicoline, andreana) and forall x (Hound(x, andreana) -> Orienting(x)) -> therefore Orienting(nicoline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The tammy is blustery. The tammy reinsure the jeremy. The magdalen overcome the tammy. The magdalen reinsure the tammy. The magdalen reinsure the jeremy. The magdalen covet the jeremy. The jeremy reinsure the magdalen. If something covet the magdalen then the magdalen is paradisaic. If something is geothermic then it overcome the jeremy. If something reinsure the magdalen then it reinsure the jeremy. If something is paradisaic then it covet the tammy. If the tammy covet the magdalen then the tammy is blustery. If something is amphoric then it covet the magdalen. If something reinsure the jeremy then it is geothermic. If something covet the jeremy then the jeremy overcome the magdalen. The tammy is not geothermic.", "logic": "\nBlustery(tammy)\nReinsure(tammy, jeremy)\nOvercome(magdalen, tammy)\nReinsure(magdalen, tammy)\nReinsure(magdalen, jeremy)\nCovet(magdalen, jeremy)\nReinsure(jeremy, magdalen)\nforall x (Covet(x, magdalen) -> Paradisaic(magdalen))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Overcome(x, jeremy))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, magdalen) -> Reinsure(x, jeremy))\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) -> Covet(x, tammy))\nCovet(tammy, magdalen) -> Blustery(tammy)\nforall x (Amphoric(x) -> Covet(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, jeremy) -> Geothermic(x))\nforall x (Covet(x, jeremy) -> Overcome(jeremy, magdalen))\n\nnot Geothermic(tammy)\n\nReinsure(tammy, jeremy) and forall x (Reinsure(x, jeremy) -> Geothermic(x)) -> therefore Geothermic(tammy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The pam is vitreous. The pam syllogise the oliy. The shelia pinch the pam. The shelia syllogise the pam. The shelia syllogise the oliy. The shelia lean the oliy. The oliy syllogise the shelia. If something lean the shelia then the shelia is azido. If something is toothed then it pinch the oliy. If something syllogise the shelia then it syllogise the oliy. If something is azido then it lean the pam. If the pam lean the shelia then the pam is vitreous. If something is isotropous then it lean the shelia. If something syllogise the oliy then it is toothed. If something lean the oliy then the oliy pinch the shelia. The oliy is toothed.", "logic": "\nVitreous(pam)\nSyllogise(pam, oliy)\nPinch(shelia, pam)\nSyllogise(shelia, pam)\nSyllogise(shelia, oliy)\nLean(shelia, oliy)\nSyllogise(oliy, shelia)\nforall x (Lean(x, shelia) -> Azido(shelia))\nforall x (Toothed(x) -> Pinch(x, oliy))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, shelia) -> Syllogise(x, oliy))\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Lean(x, pam))\nLean(pam, shelia) -> Vitreous(pam)\nforall x (Isotropous(x) -> Lean(x, shelia))\nforall x (Syllogise(x, oliy) -> Toothed(x))\nforall x (Lean(x, oliy) -> Pinch(oliy, shelia))\n\nToothed(oliy)\n\nSyllogise(oliy, shelia) and forall x (Syllogise(x, shelia) -> Syllogise(x, oliy)) -> therefore Syllogise(oliy, oliy) Syllogise(oliy, oliy) and forall x (Syllogise(x, oliy) -> Toothed(x)) -> therefore Toothed(oliy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The lissie is apolitical. The lissie meander the delia. The felicle want the lissie. The felicle meander the lissie. The felicle meander the delia. The felicle spondaize the delia. The delia meander the felicle. If something spondaize the felicle then the felicle is calyceal. If something is drowsing then it want the delia. If something meander the felicle then it meander the delia. If something is calyceal then it spondaize the lissie. If the lissie spondaize the felicle then the lissie is apolitical. If something is likely then it spondaize the felicle. If something meander the delia then it is drowsing. If something spondaize the delia then the delia want the felicle. The delia is not drowsing.", "logic": "\nApolitical(lissie)\nMeander(lissie, delia)\nWant(felicle, lissie)\nMeander(felicle, lissie)\nMeander(felicle, delia)\nSpondaize(felicle, delia)\nMeander(delia, felicle)\nforall x (Spondaize(x, felicle) -> Calyceal(felicle))\nforall x (Drowsing(x) -> Want(x, delia))\nforall x (Meander(x, felicle) -> Meander(x, delia))\nforall x (Calyceal(x) -> Spondaize(x, lissie))\nSpondaize(lissie, felicle) -> Apolitical(lissie)\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Spondaize(x, felicle))\nforall x (Meander(x, delia) -> Drowsing(x))\nforall x (Spondaize(x, delia) -> Want(delia, felicle))\n\nnot Drowsing(delia)\n\nMeander(delia, felicle) and forall x (Meander(x, felicle) -> Meander(x, delia)) -> therefore Meander(delia, delia) Meander(delia, delia) and forall x (Meander(x, delia) -> Drowsing(x)) -> therefore Drowsing(delia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The chaddy is subjective. The chaddy angulate the tamas. The theodosia decelerate the chaddy. The theodosia angulate the chaddy. The theodosia angulate the tamas. The theodosia recognise the tamas. The tamas angulate the theodosia. If something recognise the theodosia then the theodosia is stated. If something is unweary then it decelerate the tamas. If something angulate the theodosia then it angulate the tamas. If something is stated then it recognise the chaddy. If the chaddy recognise the theodosia then the chaddy is subjective. If something is confusable then it recognise the theodosia. If something angulate the tamas then it is unweary. If something recognise the tamas then the tamas decelerate the theodosia. The tamas decelerate the tamas.", "logic": "\nSubjective(chaddy)\nAngulate(chaddy, tamas)\nDecelerate(theodosia, chaddy)\nAngulate(theodosia, chaddy)\nAngulate(theodosia, tamas)\nRecognise(theodosia, tamas)\nAngulate(tamas, theodosia)\nforall x (Recognise(x, theodosia) -> Stated(theodosia))\nforall x (Unweary(x) -> Decelerate(x, tamas))\nforall x (Angulate(x, theodosia) -> Angulate(x, tamas))\nforall x (Stated(x) -> Recognise(x, chaddy))\nRecognise(chaddy, theodosia) -> Subjective(chaddy)\nforall x (Confusable(x) -> Recognise(x, theodosia))\nforall x (Angulate(x, tamas) -> Unweary(x))\nforall x (Recognise(x, tamas) -> Decelerate(tamas, theodosia))\n\nDecelerate(tamas, tamas)\n\nAngulate(tamas, theodosia) and forall x (Angulate(x, theodosia) -> Angulate(x, tamas)) -> therefore Angulate(tamas, tamas) Angulate(tamas, tamas) and forall x (Angulate(x, tamas) -> Unweary(x)) -> therefore Unweary(tamas) Unweary(tamas) and forall x (Unweary(x) -> Decelerate(x, tamas)) -> therefore Decelerate(tamas, tamas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The sherilyn is ecdemic. The sherilyn repercuss the friedric. The dorree flavor the sherilyn. The dorree repercuss the sherilyn. The dorree repercuss the friedric. The dorree rook the friedric. The friedric repercuss the dorree. If something rook the dorree then the dorree is laminal. If something is aneurysmal then it flavor the friedric. If something repercuss the dorree then it repercuss the friedric. If something is laminal then it rook the sherilyn. If the sherilyn rook the dorree then the sherilyn is ecdemic. If something is ethnical then it rook the dorree. If something repercuss the friedric then it is aneurysmal. If something rook the friedric then the friedric flavor the dorree. The friedric does not eat the friedric.", "logic": "\nEcdemic(sherilyn)\nRepercuss(sherilyn, friedric)\nFlavor(dorree, sherilyn)\nRepercuss(dorree, sherilyn)\nRepercuss(dorree, friedric)\nRook(dorree, friedric)\nRepercuss(friedric, dorree)\nforall x (Rook(x, dorree) -> Laminal(dorree))\nforall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Flavor(x, friedric))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, dorree) -> Repercuss(x, friedric))\nforall x (Laminal(x) -> Rook(x, sherilyn))\nRook(sherilyn, dorree) -> Ecdemic(sherilyn)\nforall x (Ethnical(x) -> Rook(x, dorree))\nforall x (Repercuss(x, friedric) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Rook(x, friedric) -> Flavor(friedric, dorree))\n\nnot Flavor(friedric, friedric)\n\nRepercuss(friedric, dorree) and forall x (Repercuss(x, dorree) -> Repercuss(x, friedric)) -> therefore Repercuss(friedric, friedric) Repercuss(friedric, friedric) and forall x (Repercuss(x, friedric) -> Aneurysmal(x)) -> therefore Aneurysmal(friedric) Aneurysmal(friedric) and forall x (Aneurysmal(x) -> Flavor(x, friedric)) -> therefore Flavor(friedric, friedric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The evvie is liquid. The evvie prostrate the shena. The dori cloak the evvie. The dori prostrate the evvie. The dori prostrate the shena. The dori tool the shena. The shena prostrate the dori. If something tool the dori then the dori is shamanist. If something is walking then it cloak the shena. If something prostrate the dori then it prostrate the shena. If something is shamanist then it tool the evvie. If the evvie tool the dori then the evvie is liquid. If something is newfangled then it tool the dori. If something prostrate the shena then it is walking. If something tool the shena then the shena cloak the dori. The dori does not see the evvie.", "logic": "\nLiquid(evvie)\nProstrate(evvie, shena)\nCloak(dori, evvie)\nProstrate(dori, evvie)\nProstrate(dori, shena)\nTool(dori, shena)\nProstrate(shena, dori)\nforall x (Tool(x, dori) -> Shamanist(dori))\nforall x (Walking(x) -> Cloak(x, shena))\nforall x (Prostrate(x, dori) -> Prostrate(x, shena))\nforall x (Shamanist(x) -> Tool(x, evvie))\nTool(evvie, dori) -> Liquid(evvie)\nforall x (Newfangled(x) -> Tool(x, dori))\nforall x (Prostrate(x, shena) -> Walking(x))\nforall x (Tool(x, shena) -> Cloak(shena, dori))\n\nnot Tool(dori, evvie)\n\nforall x (Shamanist(x) -> Tool(x, evvie)) <- forall x (Tool(x, dori) -> Shamanist(dori)) <- forall x (Newfangled(x) -> Tool(x, dori)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The laureen is projectile. The laureen bulldoze the asia. The raquela poetise the laureen. The raquela bulldoze the laureen. The raquela bulldoze the asia. The raquela overheat the asia. The asia bulldoze the raquela. If something overheat the raquela then the raquela is enceinte. If something is histrionic then it poetise the asia. If something bulldoze the raquela then it bulldoze the asia. If something is enceinte then it overheat the laureen. If the laureen overheat the raquela then the laureen is projectile. If something is adagio then it overheat the raquela. If something bulldoze the asia then it is histrionic. If something overheat the asia then the asia poetise the raquela. The raquela overheat the raquela.", "logic": "\nProjectile(laureen)\nBulldoze(laureen, asia)\nPoetise(raquela, laureen)\nBulldoze(raquela, laureen)\nBulldoze(raquela, asia)\nOverheat(raquela, asia)\nBulldoze(asia, raquela)\nforall x (Overheat(x, raquela) -> Enceinte(raquela))\nforall x (Histrionic(x) -> Poetise(x, asia))\nforall x (Bulldoze(x, raquela) -> Bulldoze(x, asia))\nforall x (Enceinte(x) -> Overheat(x, laureen))\nOverheat(laureen, raquela) -> Projectile(laureen)\nforall x (Adagio(x) -> Overheat(x, raquela))\nforall x (Bulldoze(x, asia) -> Histrionic(x))\nforall x (Overheat(x, asia) -> Poetise(asia, raquela))\n\nOverheat(raquela, raquela)\n\nforall x (Adagio(x) -> Overheat(x, raquela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The milli is trifoliate. The milli uprise the nanette. The darb thrust the milli. The darb uprise the milli. The darb uprise the nanette. The darb constringe the nanette. The nanette uprise the darb. If something constringe the darb then the darb is squinty. If something is unharmed then it thrust the nanette. If something uprise the darb then it uprise the nanette. If something is squinty then it constringe the milli. If the milli constringe the darb then the milli is trifoliate. If something is worried then it constringe the darb. If something uprise the nanette then it is unharmed. If something constringe the nanette then the nanette thrust the darb. The nanette does not see the milli.", "logic": "\nTrifoliate(milli)\nUprise(milli, nanette)\nThrust(darb, milli)\nUprise(darb, milli)\nUprise(darb, nanette)\nConstringe(darb, nanette)\nUprise(nanette, darb)\nforall x (Constringe(x, darb) -> Squinty(darb))\nforall x (Unharmed(x) -> Thrust(x, nanette))\nforall x (Uprise(x, darb) -> Uprise(x, nanette))\nforall x (Squinty(x) -> Constringe(x, milli))\nConstringe(milli, darb) -> Trifoliate(milli)\nforall x (Worried(x) -> Constringe(x, darb))\nforall x (Uprise(x, nanette) -> Unharmed(x))\nforall x (Constringe(x, nanette) -> Thrust(nanette, darb))\n\nnot Constringe(nanette, milli)\n\nforall x (Squinty(x) -> Constringe(x, milli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The mason is eonian. The mason volley the windy. The ford chine the mason. The ford volley the mason. The ford volley the windy. The ford ground the windy. The windy volley the ford. If something ground the ford then the ford is tuneful. If something is sourish then it chine the windy. If something volley the ford then it volley the windy. If something is tuneful then it ground the mason. If the mason ground the ford then the mason is eonian. If something is disjoint then it ground the ford. If something volley the windy then it is sourish. If something ground the windy then the windy chine the ford. The windy ground the ford.", "logic": "\nEonian(mason)\nVolley(mason, windy)\nChine(ford, mason)\nVolley(ford, mason)\nVolley(ford, windy)\nGround(ford, windy)\nVolley(windy, ford)\nforall x (Ground(x, ford) -> Tuneful(ford))\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Chine(x, windy))\nforall x (Volley(x, ford) -> Volley(x, windy))\nforall x (Tuneful(x) -> Ground(x, mason))\nGround(mason, ford) -> Eonian(mason)\nforall x (Disjoint(x) -> Ground(x, ford))\nforall x (Volley(x, windy) -> Sourish(x))\nforall x (Ground(x, windy) -> Chine(windy, ford))\n\nGround(windy, ford)\n\nforall x (Disjoint(x) -> Ground(x, ford)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The merci is hematal. The merci whap the natalie. The patti toboggan the merci. The patti whap the merci. The patti whap the natalie. The patti fundraise the natalie. The natalie whap the patti. If something fundraise the patti then the patti is univocal. If something is closing then it toboggan the natalie. If something whap the patti then it whap the natalie. If something is univocal then it fundraise the merci. If the merci fundraise the patti then the merci is hematal. If something is buckshee then it fundraise the patti. If something whap the natalie then it is closing. If something fundraise the natalie then the natalie toboggan the patti. The merci does not see the natalie.", "logic": "\nHematal(merci)\nWhap(merci, natalie)\nToboggan(patti, merci)\nWhap(patti, merci)\nWhap(patti, natalie)\nFundraise(patti, natalie)\nWhap(natalie, patti)\nforall x (Fundraise(x, patti) -> Univocal(patti))\nforall x (Closing(x) -> Toboggan(x, natalie))\nforall x (Whap(x, patti) -> Whap(x, natalie))\nforall x (Univocal(x) -> Fundraise(x, merci))\nFundraise(merci, patti) -> Hematal(merci)\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> Fundraise(x, patti))\nforall x (Whap(x, natalie) -> Closing(x))\nforall x (Fundraise(x, natalie) -> Toboggan(natalie, patti))\n\nnot Fundraise(merci, natalie)\n\nnot Fundraise(merci, natalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The cami is galled. The cami whish the arlyne. The chrissie predestine the cami. The chrissie whish the cami. The chrissie whish the arlyne. The chrissie propagate the arlyne. The arlyne whish the chrissie. If something propagate the chrissie then the chrissie is piddling. If something is debauched then it predestine the arlyne. If something whish the chrissie then it whish the arlyne. If something is piddling then it propagate the cami. If the cami propagate the chrissie then the cami is galled. If something is tantamount then it propagate the chrissie. If something whish the arlyne then it is debauched. If something propagate the arlyne then the arlyne predestine the chrissie. The cami is nice.", "logic": "\nGalled(cami)\nWhish(cami, arlyne)\nPredestine(chrissie, cami)\nWhish(chrissie, cami)\nWhish(chrissie, arlyne)\nPropagate(chrissie, arlyne)\nWhish(arlyne, chrissie)\nforall x (Propagate(x, chrissie) -> Piddling(chrissie))\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Predestine(x, arlyne))\nforall x (Whish(x, chrissie) -> Whish(x, arlyne))\nforall x (Piddling(x) -> Propagate(x, cami))\nPropagate(cami, chrissie) -> Galled(cami)\nforall x (Tantamount(x) -> Propagate(x, chrissie))\nforall x (Whish(x, arlyne) -> Debauched(x))\nforall x (Propagate(x, arlyne) -> Predestine(arlyne, chrissie))\n\nNice(cami)\n\nNice(cami) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The paule is automatic. The paule derogate the gabrila. The dominica garage the paule. The dominica derogate the paule. The dominica derogate the gabrila. The dominica farce the gabrila. The gabrila derogate the dominica. If something farce the dominica then the dominica is gallic. If something is goosy then it garage the gabrila. If something derogate the dominica then it derogate the gabrila. If something is gallic then it farce the paule. If the paule farce the dominica then the paule is automatic. If something is noteworthy then it farce the dominica. If something derogate the gabrila then it is goosy. If something farce the gabrila then the gabrila garage the dominica. The paule does not eat the paule.", "logic": "\nAutomatic(paule)\nDerogate(paule, gabrila)\nGarage(dominica, paule)\nDerogate(dominica, paule)\nDerogate(dominica, gabrila)\nFarce(dominica, gabrila)\nDerogate(gabrila, dominica)\nforall x (Farce(x, dominica) -> Gallic(dominica))\nforall x (Goosy(x) -> Garage(x, gabrila))\nforall x (Derogate(x, dominica) -> Derogate(x, gabrila))\nforall x (Gallic(x) -> Farce(x, paule))\nFarce(paule, dominica) -> Automatic(paule)\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) -> Farce(x, dominica))\nforall x (Derogate(x, gabrila) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Farce(x, gabrila) -> Garage(gabrila, dominica))\n\nnot Garage(paule, paule)\n\nnot Garage(paule, paule) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The annalise is advance. The annalise observe the beck. The krissy misspend the annalise. The krissy observe the annalise. The krissy observe the beck. The krissy unitise the beck. The beck observe the krissy. If something unitise the krissy then the krissy is nodular. If something is abomasal then it misspend the beck. If something observe the krissy then it observe the beck. If something is nodular then it unitise the annalise. If the annalise unitise the krissy then the annalise is advance. If something is lengthy then it unitise the krissy. If something observe the beck then it is abomasal. If something unitise the beck then the beck misspend the krissy. The beck observe the annalise.", "logic": "\nAdvance(annalise)\nObserve(annalise, beck)\nMisspend(krissy, annalise)\nObserve(krissy, annalise)\nObserve(krissy, beck)\nUnitise(krissy, beck)\nObserve(beck, krissy)\nforall x (Unitise(x, krissy) -> Nodular(krissy))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Misspend(x, beck))\nforall x (Observe(x, krissy) -> Observe(x, beck))\nforall x (Nodular(x) -> Unitise(x, annalise))\nUnitise(annalise, krissy) -> Advance(annalise)\nforall x (Lengthy(x) -> Unitise(x, krissy))\nforall x (Observe(x, beck) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Unitise(x, beck) -> Misspend(beck, krissy))\n\nObserve(beck, annalise)\n\nObserve(beck, annalise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-618"} {"premises": "The noni spread the zacharias. The zacharias rummage the noni. If the zacharias vowelize the noni and the zacharias rummage the noni then the noni vowelize the zacharias. If something rummage the noni then it is anaclinal. If something rummage the noni and the noni spread the zacharias then it rummage the zacharias. If something spread the noni then it is unstilted. If something rummage the zacharias then the zacharias spread the noni. If something spread the noni and the noni vowelize the zacharias then it vowelize the noni. The noni spread the zacharias.", "logic": "\nSpread(noni, zacharias)\nRummage(zacharias, noni)\nVowelize(zacharias, noni) and Rummage(zacharias, noni) -> Vowelize(noni, zacharias)\nforall x (Rummage(x, noni) -> Anaclinal(x))\nforall x (Rummage(x, noni) and Spread(noni, zacharias) -> Rummage(x, zacharias))\nforall x (Spread(x, noni) -> Unstilted(x))\nforall x (Rummage(x, zacharias) -> Spread(zacharias, noni))\nforall x (Spread(x, noni) and Vowelize(noni, zacharias) -> Vowelize(x, noni))\n\nSpread(noni, zacharias)\n\ntherefore Spread(noni, zacharias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The alexine broider the gates. The gates edify the alexine. If the gates foment the alexine and the gates edify the alexine then the alexine foment the gates. If something edify the alexine then it is thematic. If something edify the alexine and the alexine broider the gates then it edify the gates. If something broider the alexine then it is marmoreal. If something edify the gates then the gates broider the alexine. If something broider the alexine and the alexine foment the gates then it foment the alexine. The alexine does not need the gates.", "logic": "\nBroider(alexine, gates)\nEdify(gates, alexine)\nFoment(gates, alexine) and Edify(gates, alexine) -> Foment(alexine, gates)\nforall x (Edify(x, alexine) -> Thematic(x))\nforall x (Edify(x, alexine) and Broider(alexine, gates) -> Edify(x, gates))\nforall x (Broider(x, alexine) -> Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Edify(x, gates) -> Broider(gates, alexine))\nforall x (Broider(x, alexine) and Foment(alexine, gates) -> Foment(x, alexine))\n\nnot Broider(alexine, gates)\n\ntherefore Broider(alexine, gates)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The alaine hole the gilburt. The gilburt tango the alaine. If the gilburt mulch the alaine and the gilburt tango the alaine then the alaine mulch the gilburt. If something tango the alaine then it is noticeable. If something tango the alaine and the alaine hole the gilburt then it tango the gilburt. If something hole the alaine then it is centigrade. If something tango the gilburt then the gilburt hole the alaine. If something hole the alaine and the alaine mulch the gilburt then it mulch the alaine. The gilburt is noticeable.", "logic": "\nHole(alaine, gilburt)\nTango(gilburt, alaine)\nMulch(gilburt, alaine) and Tango(gilburt, alaine) -> Mulch(alaine, gilburt)\nforall x (Tango(x, alaine) -> Noticeable(x))\nforall x (Tango(x, alaine) and Hole(alaine, gilburt) -> Tango(x, gilburt))\nforall x (Hole(x, alaine) -> Centigrade(x))\nforall x (Tango(x, gilburt) -> Hole(gilburt, alaine))\nforall x (Hole(x, alaine) and Mulch(alaine, gilburt) -> Mulch(x, alaine))\n\nNoticeable(gilburt)\n\nTango(gilburt, alaine) and forall x (Tango(x, alaine) -> Noticeable(x)) -> therefore Noticeable(gilburt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The montague hydrate the tatiania. The tatiania paddle the montague. If the tatiania luge the montague and the tatiania paddle the montague then the montague luge the tatiania. If something paddle the montague then it is ephesian. If something paddle the montague and the montague hydrate the tatiania then it paddle the tatiania. If something hydrate the montague then it is lobed. If something paddle the tatiania then the tatiania hydrate the montague. If something hydrate the montague and the montague luge the tatiania then it luge the montague. The tatiania is not ephesian.", "logic": "\nHydrate(montague, tatiania)\nPaddle(tatiania, montague)\nLuge(tatiania, montague) and Paddle(tatiania, montague) -> Luge(montague, tatiania)\nforall x (Paddle(x, montague) -> Ephesian(x))\nforall x (Paddle(x, montague) and Hydrate(montague, tatiania) -> Paddle(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Hydrate(x, montague) -> Lobed(x))\nforall x (Paddle(x, tatiania) -> Hydrate(tatiania, montague))\nforall x (Hydrate(x, montague) and Luge(montague, tatiania) -> Luge(x, montague))\n\nnot Ephesian(tatiania)\n\nPaddle(tatiania, montague) and forall x (Paddle(x, montague) -> Ephesian(x)) -> therefore Ephesian(tatiania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The deana incite the dian. The dian jabber the deana. If the dian tonsure the deana and the dian jabber the deana then the deana tonsure the dian. If something jabber the deana then it is biform. If something jabber the deana and the deana incite the dian then it jabber the dian. If something incite the deana then it is acneiform. If something jabber the dian then the dian incite the deana. If something incite the deana and the deana tonsure the dian then it tonsure the deana. The dian incite the deana.", "logic": "\nIncite(deana, dian)\nJabber(dian, deana)\nTonsure(dian, deana) and Jabber(dian, deana) -> Tonsure(deana, dian)\nforall x (Jabber(x, deana) -> Biform(x))\nforall x (Jabber(x, deana) and Incite(deana, dian) -> Jabber(x, dian))\nforall x (Incite(x, deana) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Jabber(x, dian) -> Incite(dian, deana))\nforall x (Incite(x, deana) and Tonsure(deana, dian) -> Tonsure(x, deana))\n\nIncite(dian, deana)\n\nJabber(dian, deana) and Incite(deana, dian) and forall x (Jabber(x, deana) and Incite(deana, dian) -> Jabber(x, dian)) -> therefore Jabber(dian, dian) Jabber(dian, dian) and forall x (Jabber(x, dian) -> Incite(dian, deana)) -> therefore Incite(dian, deana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The farrand betray the elise. The elise shoo the farrand. If the elise convince the farrand and the elise shoo the farrand then the farrand convince the elise. If something shoo the farrand then it is plentiful. If something shoo the farrand and the farrand betray the elise then it shoo the elise. If something betray the farrand then it is federate. If something shoo the elise then the elise betray the farrand. If something betray the farrand and the farrand convince the elise then it convince the farrand. The elise does not need the farrand.", "logic": "\nBetray(farrand, elise)\nShoo(elise, farrand)\nConvince(elise, farrand) and Shoo(elise, farrand) -> Convince(farrand, elise)\nforall x (Shoo(x, farrand) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Shoo(x, farrand) and Betray(farrand, elise) -> Shoo(x, elise))\nforall x (Betray(x, farrand) -> Federate(x))\nforall x (Shoo(x, elise) -> Betray(elise, farrand))\nforall x (Betray(x, farrand) and Convince(farrand, elise) -> Convince(x, farrand))\n\nnot Betray(elise, farrand)\n\nShoo(elise, farrand) and Betray(farrand, elise) and forall x (Shoo(x, farrand) and Betray(farrand, elise) -> Shoo(x, elise)) -> therefore Shoo(elise, elise) Shoo(elise, elise) and forall x (Shoo(x, elise) -> Betray(elise, farrand)) -> therefore Betray(elise, farrand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The shannan enkindle the lark. The lark extend the shannan. If the lark prickle the shannan and the lark extend the shannan then the shannan prickle the lark. If something extend the shannan then it is inevitable. If something extend the shannan and the shannan enkindle the lark then it extend the lark. If something enkindle the shannan then it is feverish. If something extend the lark then the lark enkindle the shannan. If something enkindle the shannan and the shannan prickle the lark then it prickle the shannan. The lark is feverish.", "logic": "\nEnkindle(shannan, lark)\nExtend(lark, shannan)\nPrickle(lark, shannan) and Extend(lark, shannan) -> Prickle(shannan, lark)\nforall x (Extend(x, shannan) -> Inevitable(x))\nforall x (Extend(x, shannan) and Enkindle(shannan, lark) -> Extend(x, lark))\nforall x (Enkindle(x, shannan) -> Feverish(x))\nforall x (Extend(x, lark) -> Enkindle(lark, shannan))\nforall x (Enkindle(x, shannan) and Prickle(shannan, lark) -> Prickle(x, shannan))\n\nFeverish(lark)\n\nExtend(lark, shannan) and Enkindle(shannan, lark) and forall x (Extend(x, shannan) and Enkindle(shannan, lark) -> Extend(x, lark)) -> therefore Extend(lark, lark) Extend(lark, lark) and forall x (Extend(x, lark) -> Enkindle(lark, shannan)) -> therefore Enkindle(lark, shannan) Enkindle(lark, shannan) and forall x (Enkindle(x, shannan) -> Feverish(x)) -> therefore Feverish(lark)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The andres freelance the saundra. The saundra reinsure the andres. If the saundra smooth the andres and the saundra reinsure the andres then the andres smooth the saundra. If something reinsure the andres then it is alate. If something reinsure the andres and the andres freelance the saundra then it reinsure the saundra. If something freelance the andres then it is obsolete. If something reinsure the saundra then the saundra freelance the andres. If something freelance the andres and the andres smooth the saundra then it smooth the andres. The saundra is not obsolete.", "logic": "\nFreelance(andres, saundra)\nReinsure(saundra, andres)\nSmooth(saundra, andres) and Reinsure(saundra, andres) -> Smooth(andres, saundra)\nforall x (Reinsure(x, andres) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, andres) and Freelance(andres, saundra) -> Reinsure(x, saundra))\nforall x (Freelance(x, andres) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, saundra) -> Freelance(saundra, andres))\nforall x (Freelance(x, andres) and Smooth(andres, saundra) -> Smooth(x, andres))\n\nnot Obsolete(saundra)\n\nReinsure(saundra, andres) and Freelance(andres, saundra) and forall x (Reinsure(x, andres) and Freelance(andres, saundra) -> Reinsure(x, saundra)) -> therefore Reinsure(saundra, saundra) Reinsure(saundra, saundra) and forall x (Reinsure(x, saundra) -> Freelance(saundra, andres)) -> therefore Freelance(saundra, andres) Freelance(saundra, andres) and forall x (Freelance(x, andres) -> Obsolete(x)) -> therefore Obsolete(saundra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The brena lessen the bartel. The bartel sire the brena. If the bartel refloat the brena and the bartel sire the brena then the brena refloat the bartel. If something sire the brena then it is million. If something sire the brena and the brena lessen the bartel then it sire the bartel. If something lessen the brena then it is leery. If something sire the bartel then the bartel lessen the brena. If something lessen the brena and the brena refloat the bartel then it refloat the brena. The brena does not eat the bartel.", "logic": "\nLessen(brena, bartel)\nSire(bartel, brena)\nRefloat(bartel, brena) and Sire(bartel, brena) -> Refloat(brena, bartel)\nforall x (Sire(x, brena) -> Million(x))\nforall x (Sire(x, brena) and Lessen(brena, bartel) -> Sire(x, bartel))\nforall x (Lessen(x, brena) -> Leery(x))\nforall x (Sire(x, bartel) -> Lessen(bartel, brena))\nforall x (Lessen(x, brena) and Refloat(brena, bartel) -> Refloat(x, brena))\n\nnot Refloat(brena, bartel)\n\nRefloat(bartel, brena) and Sire(bartel, brena) -> Refloat(brena, bartel) <- forall x (Lessen(x, brena) and Refloat(brena, bartel) -> Refloat(x, brena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The laure teach the ellette. The ellette sonnet the laure. If the ellette gloss the laure and the ellette sonnet the laure then the laure gloss the ellette. If something sonnet the laure then it is thyroidal. If something sonnet the laure and the laure teach the ellette then it sonnet the ellette. If something teach the laure then it is extendible. If something sonnet the ellette then the ellette teach the laure. If something teach the laure and the laure gloss the ellette then it gloss the laure. The ellette gloss the laure.", "logic": "\nTeach(laure, ellette)\nSonnet(ellette, laure)\nGloss(ellette, laure) and Sonnet(ellette, laure) -> Gloss(laure, ellette)\nforall x (Sonnet(x, laure) -> Thyroidal(x))\nforall x (Sonnet(x, laure) and Teach(laure, ellette) -> Sonnet(x, ellette))\nforall x (Teach(x, laure) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Sonnet(x, ellette) -> Teach(ellette, laure))\nforall x (Teach(x, laure) and Gloss(laure, ellette) -> Gloss(x, laure))\n\nGloss(ellette, laure)\n\nforall x (Teach(x, laure) and Gloss(laure, ellette) -> Gloss(x, laure)) <- Gloss(ellette, laure) and Sonnet(ellette, laure) -> Gloss(laure, ellette) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The derrick elude the dorothea. The dorothea moralize the derrick. If the dorothea dehisce the derrick and the dorothea moralize the derrick then the derrick dehisce the dorothea. If something moralize the derrick then it is condemning. If something moralize the derrick and the derrick elude the dorothea then it moralize the dorothea. If something elude the derrick then it is prophetic. If something moralize the dorothea then the dorothea elude the derrick. If something elude the derrick and the derrick dehisce the dorothea then it dehisce the derrick. The derrick does not eat the derrick.", "logic": "\nElude(derrick, dorothea)\nMoralize(dorothea, derrick)\nDehisce(dorothea, derrick) and Moralize(dorothea, derrick) -> Dehisce(derrick, dorothea)\nforall x (Moralize(x, derrick) -> Condemning(x))\nforall x (Moralize(x, derrick) and Elude(derrick, dorothea) -> Moralize(x, dorothea))\nforall x (Elude(x, derrick) -> Prophetic(x))\nforall x (Moralize(x, dorothea) -> Elude(dorothea, derrick))\nforall x (Elude(x, derrick) and Dehisce(derrick, dorothea) -> Dehisce(x, derrick))\n\nnot Dehisce(derrick, derrick)\n\nforall x (Elude(x, derrick) and Dehisce(derrick, dorothea) -> Dehisce(x, derrick)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The vickie overtrump the magdaia. The magdaia disfavor the vickie. If the magdaia incubate the vickie and the magdaia disfavor the vickie then the vickie incubate the magdaia. If something disfavor the vickie then it is chestnut. If something disfavor the vickie and the vickie overtrump the magdaia then it disfavor the magdaia. If something overtrump the vickie then it is stinting. If something disfavor the magdaia then the magdaia overtrump the vickie. If something overtrump the vickie and the vickie incubate the magdaia then it incubate the vickie. The vickie disfavor the magdaia.", "logic": "\nOvertrump(vickie, magdaia)\nDisfavor(magdaia, vickie)\nIncubate(magdaia, vickie) and Disfavor(magdaia, vickie) -> Incubate(vickie, magdaia)\nforall x (Disfavor(x, vickie) -> Chestnut(x))\nforall x (Disfavor(x, vickie) and Overtrump(vickie, magdaia) -> Disfavor(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Overtrump(x, vickie) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Disfavor(x, magdaia) -> Overtrump(magdaia, vickie))\nforall x (Overtrump(x, vickie) and Incubate(vickie, magdaia) -> Incubate(x, vickie))\n\nDisfavor(vickie, magdaia)\n\nforall x (Disfavor(x, vickie) and Overtrump(vickie, magdaia) -> Disfavor(x, magdaia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The zaria liberalise the anatola. The anatola eschew the zaria. If the anatola vend the zaria and the anatola eschew the zaria then the zaria vend the anatola. If something eschew the zaria then it is unfounded. If something eschew the zaria and the zaria liberalise the anatola then it eschew the anatola. If something liberalise the zaria then it is catechetic. If something eschew the anatola then the anatola liberalise the zaria. If something liberalise the zaria and the zaria vend the anatola then it vend the zaria. The anatola does not need the anatola.", "logic": "\nLiberalise(zaria, anatola)\nEschew(anatola, zaria)\nVend(anatola, zaria) and Eschew(anatola, zaria) -> Vend(zaria, anatola)\nforall x (Eschew(x, zaria) -> Unfounded(x))\nforall x (Eschew(x, zaria) and Liberalise(zaria, anatola) -> Eschew(x, anatola))\nforall x (Liberalise(x, zaria) -> Catechetic(x))\nforall x (Eschew(x, anatola) -> Liberalise(anatola, zaria))\nforall x (Liberalise(x, zaria) and Vend(zaria, anatola) -> Vend(x, zaria))\n\nnot Liberalise(anatola, anatola)\n\nnot Liberalise(anatola, anatola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The reagan unsnarl the inesita. The inesita defoliate the reagan. If the inesita bellow the reagan and the inesita defoliate the reagan then the reagan bellow the inesita. If something defoliate the reagan then it is twelfth. If something defoliate the reagan and the reagan unsnarl the inesita then it defoliate the inesita. If something unsnarl the reagan then it is unkempt. If something defoliate the inesita then the inesita unsnarl the reagan. If something unsnarl the reagan and the reagan bellow the inesita then it bellow the reagan. The reagan is cold.", "logic": "\nUnsnarl(reagan, inesita)\nDefoliate(inesita, reagan)\nBellow(inesita, reagan) and Defoliate(inesita, reagan) -> Bellow(reagan, inesita)\nforall x (Defoliate(x, reagan) -> Twelfth(x))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, reagan) and Unsnarl(reagan, inesita) -> Defoliate(x, inesita))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, reagan) -> Unkempt(x))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, inesita) -> Unsnarl(inesita, reagan))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, reagan) and Bellow(reagan, inesita) -> Bellow(x, reagan))\n\nCold(reagan)\n\nCold(reagan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The nadine disembark the margarita. The margarita alkalinize the nadine. If the margarita splash the nadine and the margarita alkalinize the nadine then the nadine splash the margarita. If something alkalinize the nadine then it is bookable. If something alkalinize the nadine and the nadine disembark the margarita then it alkalinize the margarita. If something disembark the nadine then it is beetle. If something alkalinize the margarita then the margarita disembark the nadine. If something disembark the nadine and the nadine splash the margarita then it splash the nadine. The margarita is not blue.", "logic": "\nDisembark(nadine, margarita)\nAlkalinize(margarita, nadine)\nSplash(margarita, nadine) and Alkalinize(margarita, nadine) -> Splash(nadine, margarita)\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, nadine) -> Bookable(x))\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, nadine) and Disembark(nadine, margarita) -> Alkalinize(x, margarita))\nforall x (Disembark(x, nadine) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, margarita) -> Disembark(margarita, nadine))\nforall x (Disembark(x, nadine) and Splash(nadine, margarita) -> Splash(x, nadine))\n\nnot Blue(margarita)\n\nnot Blue(margarita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "The theada unmake the brigida. The brigida famish the theada. If the brigida eternize the theada and the brigida famish the theada then the theada eternize the brigida. If something famish the theada then it is socialist. If something famish the theada and the theada unmake the brigida then it famish the brigida. If something unmake the theada then it is wigged. If something famish the brigida then the brigida unmake the theada. If something unmake the theada and the theada eternize the brigida then it eternize the theada. The theada is kind.", "logic": "\nUnmake(theada, brigida)\nFamish(brigida, theada)\nEternize(brigida, theada) and Famish(brigida, theada) -> Eternize(theada, brigida)\nforall x (Famish(x, theada) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Famish(x, theada) and Unmake(theada, brigida) -> Famish(x, brigida))\nforall x (Unmake(x, theada) -> Wigged(x))\nforall x (Famish(x, brigida) -> Unmake(brigida, theada))\nforall x (Unmake(x, theada) and Eternize(theada, brigida) -> Eternize(x, theada))\n\nKind(theada)\n\nKind(theada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-439"} {"premises": "Rhett is perfumed. Rhett is explicit. Rhett is eutherian. Rhett is bouncing. Rhett is bawdy. Mag is lxxxv. Mag is explicit. Mag is eutherian. Mag is bouncing. Rheta is perfumed. Rheta is bawdy. Glorianna is lxxxv. Glorianna is explicit. Glorianna is eutherian. Glorianna is bawdy. If someone is rockbound and not perfumed then they are not bouncing. Glorianna is eutherian.", "logic": "\nPerfumed(rhett)\nExplicit(rhett)\nEutherian(rhett)\nBouncing(rhett)\nBawdy(rhett)\nLxxxv(mag)\nExplicit(mag)\nEutherian(mag)\nBouncing(mag)\nPerfumed(rheta)\nBawdy(rheta)\nLxxxv(glorianna)\nExplicit(glorianna)\nEutherian(glorianna)\nBawdy(glorianna)\nforall x (Rockbound(x) and not Perfumed(x) -> not Bouncing(x))\n\nEutherian(glorianna)\n\ntherefore Eutherian(glorianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1247"} {"premises": "Elli is recluse. Elli is negligible. Elli is negligent. Elli is motorial. Elli is ravenous. Ashly is umpteenth. Ashly is negligible. Ashly is negligent. Ashly is motorial. Dorene is recluse. Dorene is ravenous. Berkie is umpteenth. Berkie is negligible. Berkie is negligent. Berkie is ravenous. If someone is ruby and not recluse then they are not motorial. Elli is not negligent.", "logic": "\nRecluse(elli)\nNegligible(elli)\nNegligent(elli)\nMotorial(elli)\nRavenous(elli)\nUmpteenth(ashly)\nNegligible(ashly)\nNegligent(ashly)\nMotorial(ashly)\nRecluse(dorene)\nRavenous(dorene)\nUmpteenth(berkie)\nNegligible(berkie)\nNegligent(berkie)\nRavenous(berkie)\nforall x (Ruby(x) and not Recluse(x) -> not Motorial(x))\n\nnot Negligent(elli)\n\ntherefore Negligent(elli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1247"} {"premises": "Putnam is baggy. Putnam is appalled. Putnam is impacted. Putnam is fivefold. Putnam is discreet. Zuzana is hinder. Zuzana is appalled. Zuzana is impacted. Zuzana is fivefold. Diane is baggy. Diane is discreet. Sayres is hinder. Sayres is appalled. Sayres is impacted. Sayres is discreet. If someone is unmannerly and not baggy then they are not fivefold. Diane is not fivefold.", "logic": "\nBaggy(putnam)\nAppalled(putnam)\nImpacted(putnam)\nFivefold(putnam)\nDiscreet(putnam)\nHinder(zuzana)\nAppalled(zuzana)\nImpacted(zuzana)\nFivefold(zuzana)\nBaggy(diane)\nDiscreet(diane)\nHinder(sayres)\nAppalled(sayres)\nImpacted(sayres)\nDiscreet(sayres)\nforall x (Unmannerly(x) and not Baggy(x) -> not Fivefold(x))\n\nnot Fivefold(diane)\n\nnot Fivefold(diane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1247"} {"premises": "Reginald is tough. Reginald is episcopal. Reginald is euclidian. Reginald is unaltered. Reginald is romani. Carlita is talented. Carlita is episcopal. Carlita is euclidian. Carlita is unaltered. Deryl is tough. Deryl is romani. Rock is talented. Rock is episcopal. Rock is euclidian. Rock is romani. If someone is moblike and not tough then they are not unaltered. Carlita is moblike.", "logic": "\nTough(reginald)\nEpiscopal(reginald)\nEuclidian(reginald)\nUnaltered(reginald)\nRomani(reginald)\nTalented(carlita)\nEpiscopal(carlita)\nEuclidian(carlita)\nUnaltered(carlita)\nTough(deryl)\nRomani(deryl)\nTalented(rock)\nEpiscopal(rock)\nEuclidian(rock)\nRomani(rock)\nforall x (Moblike(x) and not Tough(x) -> not Unaltered(x))\n\nMoblike(carlita)\n\nMoblike(carlita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1247"} {"premises": "The chance is enolic. The chance soil the dennie. The chance birle the dennie. The dennie does not chase the chance. The dennie is not eery. The dennie is ready. The dennie soil the chance. If someone birle the dennie then they need the chance. If someone analogise the dennie then they are not enolic. If someone is eery then they are not craggy. If someone birle the chance and they are enolic then the chance does not see the dennie. If someone analogise the chance and they are unstated then the chance does not see the dennie. If someone birle the dennie and the dennie analogise the chance then the chance birle the dennie. If someone is enolic and they need the chance then the chance is eery. If someone is unstated then they see the chance. The dennie is ready.", "logic": "\nEnolic(chance)\nSoil(chance, dennie)\nBirle(chance, dennie)\nnot Analogise(dennie, chance)\nnot Eery(dennie)\nReady(dennie)\nSoil(dennie, chance)\nforall x (Birle(x, dennie) -> Soil(x, chance))\nforall x (Analogise(x, dennie) -> not Enolic(x))\nforall x (Eery(x) -> not Craggy(x))\nforall x (Birle(x, chance) and Enolic(x) -> not Birle(chance, dennie))\nforall x (Analogise(x, chance) and Unstated(x) -> not Birle(chance, dennie))\nforall x (Birle(x, dennie) and Analogise(dennie, chance) -> Birle(chance, dennie))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Soil(x, chance) -> Eery(chance))\nforall x (Unstated(x) -> Birle(x, chance))\n\nReady(dennie)\n\ntherefore Ready(dennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The courtney is cringing. The courtney disable the hamid. The courtney retread the hamid. The hamid does not chase the courtney. The hamid is not sham. The hamid is possessive. The hamid disable the courtney. If someone retread the hamid then they need the courtney. If someone harshen the hamid then they are not cringing. If someone is sham then they are not some. If someone retread the courtney and they are cringing then the courtney does not see the hamid. If someone harshen the courtney and they are principled then the courtney does not see the hamid. If someone retread the hamid and the hamid harshen the courtney then the courtney retread the hamid. If someone is cringing and they need the courtney then the courtney is sham. If someone is principled then they see the courtney. The courtney is not cringing.", "logic": "\nCringing(courtney)\nDisable(courtney, hamid)\nRetread(courtney, hamid)\nnot Harshen(hamid, courtney)\nnot Sham(hamid)\nPossessive(hamid)\nDisable(hamid, courtney)\nforall x (Retread(x, hamid) -> Disable(x, courtney))\nforall x (Harshen(x, hamid) -> not Cringing(x))\nforall x (Sham(x) -> not Some(x))\nforall x (Retread(x, courtney) and Cringing(x) -> not Retread(courtney, hamid))\nforall x (Harshen(x, courtney) and Principled(x) -> not Retread(courtney, hamid))\nforall x (Retread(x, hamid) and Harshen(hamid, courtney) -> Retread(courtney, hamid))\nforall x (Cringing(x) and Disable(x, courtney) -> Sham(courtney))\nforall x (Principled(x) -> Retread(x, courtney))\n\nnot Cringing(courtney)\n\ntherefore Cringing(courtney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The julissa is prefaded. The julissa helm the connie. The julissa abdicate the connie. The connie does not chase the julissa. The connie is not unavowed. The connie is elaborate. The connie helm the julissa. If someone abdicate the connie then they need the julissa. If someone retail the connie then they are not prefaded. If someone is unavowed then they are not gone. If someone abdicate the julissa and they are prefaded then the julissa does not see the connie. If someone retail the julissa and they are accepted then the julissa does not see the connie. If someone abdicate the connie and the connie retail the julissa then the julissa abdicate the connie. If someone is prefaded and they need the julissa then the julissa is unavowed. If someone is accepted then they see the julissa. The julissa helm the julissa.", "logic": "\nPrefaded(julissa)\nHelm(julissa, connie)\nAbdicate(julissa, connie)\nnot Retail(connie, julissa)\nnot Unavowed(connie)\nElaborate(connie)\nHelm(connie, julissa)\nforall x (Abdicate(x, connie) -> Helm(x, julissa))\nforall x (Retail(x, connie) -> not Prefaded(x))\nforall x (Unavowed(x) -> not Gone(x))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, julissa) and Prefaded(x) -> not Abdicate(julissa, connie))\nforall x (Retail(x, julissa) and Accepted(x) -> not Abdicate(julissa, connie))\nforall x (Abdicate(x, connie) and Retail(connie, julissa) -> Abdicate(julissa, connie))\nforall x (Prefaded(x) and Helm(x, julissa) -> Unavowed(julissa))\nforall x (Accepted(x) -> Abdicate(x, julissa))\n\nHelm(julissa, julissa)\n\nAbdicate(julissa, connie) and forall x (Abdicate(x, connie) -> Helm(x, julissa)) -> therefore Helm(julissa, julissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The katrina is torturing. The katrina inweave the beryl. The katrina quip the beryl. The beryl does not chase the katrina. The beryl is not blaring. The beryl is infeasible. The beryl inweave the katrina. If someone quip the beryl then they need the katrina. If someone racket the beryl then they are not torturing. If someone is blaring then they are not metrical. If someone quip the katrina and they are torturing then the katrina does not see the beryl. If someone racket the katrina and they are vulpine then the katrina does not see the beryl. If someone quip the beryl and the beryl racket the katrina then the katrina quip the beryl. If someone is torturing and they need the katrina then the katrina is blaring. If someone is vulpine then they see the katrina. The katrina does not need the katrina.", "logic": "\nTorturing(katrina)\nInweave(katrina, beryl)\nQuip(katrina, beryl)\nnot Racket(beryl, katrina)\nnot Blaring(beryl)\nInfeasible(beryl)\nInweave(beryl, katrina)\nforall x (Quip(x, beryl) -> Inweave(x, katrina))\nforall x (Racket(x, beryl) -> not Torturing(x))\nforall x (Blaring(x) -> not Metrical(x))\nforall x (Quip(x, katrina) and Torturing(x) -> not Quip(katrina, beryl))\nforall x (Racket(x, katrina) and Vulpine(x) -> not Quip(katrina, beryl))\nforall x (Quip(x, beryl) and Racket(beryl, katrina) -> Quip(katrina, beryl))\nforall x (Torturing(x) and Inweave(x, katrina) -> Blaring(katrina))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) -> Quip(x, katrina))\n\nnot Inweave(katrina, katrina)\n\nQuip(katrina, beryl) and forall x (Quip(x, beryl) -> Inweave(x, katrina)) -> therefore Inweave(katrina, katrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The fremont is abstract. The fremont nullify the garold. The fremont hibachi the garold. The garold does not chase the fremont. The garold is not unaccepted. The garold is nonmetal. The garold nullify the fremont. If someone hibachi the garold then they need the fremont. If someone magnify the garold then they are not abstract. If someone is unaccepted then they are not standby. If someone hibachi the fremont and they are abstract then the fremont does not see the garold. If someone magnify the fremont and they are pleonastic then the fremont does not see the garold. If someone hibachi the garold and the garold magnify the fremont then the fremont hibachi the garold. If someone is abstract and they need the fremont then the fremont is unaccepted. If someone is pleonastic then they see the fremont. The fremont is unaccepted.", "logic": "\nAbstract(fremont)\nNullify(fremont, garold)\nHibachi(fremont, garold)\nnot Magnify(garold, fremont)\nnot Unaccepted(garold)\nNonmetal(garold)\nNullify(garold, fremont)\nforall x (Hibachi(x, garold) -> Nullify(x, fremont))\nforall x (Magnify(x, garold) -> not Abstract(x))\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) -> not Standby(x))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, fremont) and Abstract(x) -> not Hibachi(fremont, garold))\nforall x (Magnify(x, fremont) and Pleonastic(x) -> not Hibachi(fremont, garold))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, garold) and Magnify(garold, fremont) -> Hibachi(fremont, garold))\nforall x (Abstract(x) and Nullify(x, fremont) -> Unaccepted(fremont))\nforall x (Pleonastic(x) -> Hibachi(x, fremont))\n\nUnaccepted(fremont)\n\nHibachi(fremont, garold) and forall x (Hibachi(x, garold) -> Nullify(x, fremont)) -> therefore Nullify(fremont, fremont) Abstract(fremont) and Nullify(fremont, fremont) and forall x (Abstract(x) and Nullify(x, fremont) -> Unaccepted(fremont)) -> therefore Unaccepted(fremont)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The shaylynn is nonsexual. The shaylynn discourage the rebecka. The shaylynn westernise the rebecka. The rebecka does not chase the shaylynn. The rebecka is not arthritic. The rebecka is untipped. The rebecka discourage the shaylynn. If someone westernise the rebecka then they need the shaylynn. If someone supinate the rebecka then they are not nonsexual. If someone is arthritic then they are not monoicous. If someone westernise the shaylynn and they are nonsexual then the shaylynn does not see the rebecka. If someone supinate the shaylynn and they are nonsweet then the shaylynn does not see the rebecka. If someone westernise the rebecka and the rebecka supinate the shaylynn then the shaylynn westernise the rebecka. If someone is nonsexual and they need the shaylynn then the shaylynn is arthritic. If someone is nonsweet then they see the shaylynn. The shaylynn is not arthritic.", "logic": "\nNonsexual(shaylynn)\nDiscourage(shaylynn, rebecka)\nWesternise(shaylynn, rebecka)\nnot Supinate(rebecka, shaylynn)\nnot Arthritic(rebecka)\nUntipped(rebecka)\nDiscourage(rebecka, shaylynn)\nforall x (Westernise(x, rebecka) -> Discourage(x, shaylynn))\nforall x (Supinate(x, rebecka) -> not Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) -> not Monoicous(x))\nforall x (Westernise(x, shaylynn) and Nonsexual(x) -> not Westernise(shaylynn, rebecka))\nforall x (Supinate(x, shaylynn) and Nonsweet(x) -> not Westernise(shaylynn, rebecka))\nforall x (Westernise(x, rebecka) and Supinate(rebecka, shaylynn) -> Westernise(shaylynn, rebecka))\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) and Discourage(x, shaylynn) -> Arthritic(shaylynn))\nforall x (Nonsweet(x) -> Westernise(x, shaylynn))\n\nnot Arthritic(shaylynn)\n\nWesternise(shaylynn, rebecka) and forall x (Westernise(x, rebecka) -> Discourage(x, shaylynn)) -> therefore Discourage(shaylynn, shaylynn) Nonsexual(shaylynn) and Discourage(shaylynn, shaylynn) and forall x (Nonsexual(x) and Discourage(x, shaylynn) -> Arthritic(shaylynn)) -> therefore Arthritic(shaylynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The dennis is acuate. The dennis photostat the catherina. The dennis ameliorate the catherina. The catherina does not chase the dennis. The catherina is not anglican. The catherina is swayback. The catherina photostat the dennis. If someone ameliorate the catherina then they need the dennis. If someone label the catherina then they are not acuate. If someone is anglican then they are not antepartum. If someone ameliorate the dennis and they are acuate then the dennis does not see the catherina. If someone label the dennis and they are hired then the dennis does not see the catherina. If someone ameliorate the catherina and the catherina label the dennis then the dennis ameliorate the catherina. If someone is acuate and they need the dennis then the dennis is anglican. If someone is hired then they see the dennis. The dennis is not antepartum.", "logic": "\nAcuate(dennis)\nPhotostat(dennis, catherina)\nAmeliorate(dennis, catherina)\nnot Label(catherina, dennis)\nnot Anglican(catherina)\nSwayback(catherina)\nPhotostat(catherina, dennis)\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, catherina) -> Photostat(x, dennis))\nforall x (Label(x, catherina) -> not Acuate(x))\nforall x (Anglican(x) -> not Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, dennis) and Acuate(x) -> not Ameliorate(dennis, catherina))\nforall x (Label(x, dennis) and Hired(x) -> not Ameliorate(dennis, catherina))\nforall x (Ameliorate(x, catherina) and Label(catherina, dennis) -> Ameliorate(dennis, catherina))\nforall x (Acuate(x) and Photostat(x, dennis) -> Anglican(dennis))\nforall x (Hired(x) -> Ameliorate(x, dennis))\n\nnot Antepartum(dennis)\n\nAmeliorate(dennis, catherina) and forall x (Ameliorate(x, catherina) -> Photostat(x, dennis)) -> therefore Photostat(dennis, dennis) Acuate(dennis) and Photostat(dennis, dennis) and forall x (Acuate(x) and Photostat(x, dennis) -> Anglican(dennis)) -> therefore Anglican(dennis) Anglican(dennis) and forall x (Anglican(x) -> not Antepartum(x)) -> therefore not Antepartum(dennis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The georges is croaky. The georges disenable the aditya. The georges straw the aditya. The aditya does not chase the georges. The aditya is not albinal. The aditya is romanist. The aditya disenable the georges. If someone straw the aditya then they need the georges. If someone clank the aditya then they are not croaky. If someone is albinal then they are not subocean. If someone straw the georges and they are croaky then the georges does not see the aditya. If someone clank the georges and they are saporous then the georges does not see the aditya. If someone straw the aditya and the aditya clank the georges then the georges straw the aditya. If someone is croaky and they need the georges then the georges is albinal. If someone is saporous then they see the georges. The georges is subocean.", "logic": "\nCroaky(georges)\nDisenable(georges, aditya)\nStraw(georges, aditya)\nnot Clank(aditya, georges)\nnot Albinal(aditya)\nRomanist(aditya)\nDisenable(aditya, georges)\nforall x (Straw(x, aditya) -> Disenable(x, georges))\nforall x (Clank(x, aditya) -> not Croaky(x))\nforall x (Albinal(x) -> not Subocean(x))\nforall x (Straw(x, georges) and Croaky(x) -> not Straw(georges, aditya))\nforall x (Clank(x, georges) and Saporous(x) -> not Straw(georges, aditya))\nforall x (Straw(x, aditya) and Clank(aditya, georges) -> Straw(georges, aditya))\nforall x (Croaky(x) and Disenable(x, georges) -> Albinal(georges))\nforall x (Saporous(x) -> Straw(x, georges))\n\nSubocean(georges)\n\nStraw(georges, aditya) and forall x (Straw(x, aditya) -> Disenable(x, georges)) -> therefore Disenable(georges, georges) Croaky(georges) and Disenable(georges, georges) and forall x (Croaky(x) and Disenable(x, georges) -> Albinal(georges)) -> therefore Albinal(georges) Albinal(georges) and forall x (Albinal(x) -> not Subocean(x)) -> therefore not Subocean(georges)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The rora is abrasive. The rora coax the yves. The rora white the yves. The yves does not chase the rora. The yves is not laryngeal. The yves is human. The yves coax the rora. If someone white the yves then they need the rora. If someone incense the yves then they are not abrasive. If someone is laryngeal then they are not dependant. If someone white the rora and they are abrasive then the rora does not see the yves. If someone incense the rora and they are unsalted then the rora does not see the yves. If someone white the yves and the yves incense the rora then the rora white the yves. If someone is abrasive and they need the rora then the rora is laryngeal. If someone is unsalted then they see the rora. The yves does not see the rora.", "logic": "\nAbrasive(rora)\nCoax(rora, yves)\nWhite(rora, yves)\nnot Incense(yves, rora)\nnot Laryngeal(yves)\nHuman(yves)\nCoax(yves, rora)\nforall x (White(x, yves) -> Coax(x, rora))\nforall x (Incense(x, yves) -> not Abrasive(x))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> not Dependant(x))\nforall x (White(x, rora) and Abrasive(x) -> not White(rora, yves))\nforall x (Incense(x, rora) and Unsalted(x) -> not White(rora, yves))\nforall x (White(x, yves) and Incense(yves, rora) -> White(rora, yves))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) and Coax(x, rora) -> Laryngeal(rora))\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> White(x, rora))\n\nnot White(yves, rora)\n\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> White(x, rora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The tan is aroused. The tan confer the sharline. The tan unclothe the sharline. The sharline does not chase the tan. The sharline is not guatemalan. The sharline is tripartite. The sharline confer the tan. If someone unclothe the sharline then they need the tan. If someone chine the sharline then they are not aroused. If someone is guatemalan then they are not existing. If someone unclothe the tan and they are aroused then the tan does not see the sharline. If someone chine the tan and they are diaphanous then the tan does not see the sharline. If someone unclothe the sharline and the sharline chine the tan then the tan unclothe the sharline. If someone is aroused and they need the tan then the tan is guatemalan. If someone is diaphanous then they see the tan. The tan unclothe the tan.", "logic": "\nAroused(tan)\nConfer(tan, sharline)\nUnclothe(tan, sharline)\nnot Chine(sharline, tan)\nnot Guatemalan(sharline)\nTripartite(sharline)\nConfer(sharline, tan)\nforall x (Unclothe(x, sharline) -> Confer(x, tan))\nforall x (Chine(x, sharline) -> not Aroused(x))\nforall x (Guatemalan(x) -> not Existing(x))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, tan) and Aroused(x) -> not Unclothe(tan, sharline))\nforall x (Chine(x, tan) and Diaphanous(x) -> not Unclothe(tan, sharline))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, sharline) and Chine(sharline, tan) -> Unclothe(tan, sharline))\nforall x (Aroused(x) and Confer(x, tan) -> Guatemalan(tan))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) -> Unclothe(x, tan))\n\nUnclothe(tan, tan)\n\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) -> Unclothe(x, tan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The dougie is battleful. The dougie complete the collins. The dougie unitize the collins. The collins does not chase the dougie. The collins is not gardant. The collins is allometric. The collins complete the dougie. If someone unitize the collins then they need the dougie. If someone migrate the collins then they are not battleful. If someone is gardant then they are not subaltern. If someone unitize the dougie and they are battleful then the dougie does not see the collins. If someone migrate the dougie and they are tired then the dougie does not see the collins. If someone unitize the collins and the collins migrate the dougie then the dougie unitize the collins. If someone is battleful and they need the dougie then the dougie is gardant. If someone is tired then they see the dougie. The dougie does not chase the collins.", "logic": "\nBattleful(dougie)\nComplete(dougie, collins)\nUnitize(dougie, collins)\nnot Migrate(collins, dougie)\nnot Gardant(collins)\nAllometric(collins)\nComplete(collins, dougie)\nforall x (Unitize(x, collins) -> Complete(x, dougie))\nforall x (Migrate(x, collins) -> not Battleful(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> not Subaltern(x))\nforall x (Unitize(x, dougie) and Battleful(x) -> not Unitize(dougie, collins))\nforall x (Migrate(x, dougie) and Tired(x) -> not Unitize(dougie, collins))\nforall x (Unitize(x, collins) and Migrate(collins, dougie) -> Unitize(dougie, collins))\nforall x (Battleful(x) and Complete(x, dougie) -> Gardant(dougie))\nforall x (Tired(x) -> Unitize(x, dougie))\n\nnot Migrate(dougie, collins)\n\nnot Migrate(dougie, collins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The xaviera is contented. The xaviera enshrine the madona. The xaviera disembody the madona. The madona does not chase the xaviera. The madona is not loamy. The madona is innate. The madona enshrine the xaviera. If someone disembody the madona then they need the xaviera. If someone arbitrate the madona then they are not contented. If someone is loamy then they are not barelegged. If someone disembody the xaviera and they are contented then the xaviera does not see the madona. If someone arbitrate the xaviera and they are sectarian then the xaviera does not see the madona. If someone disembody the madona and the madona arbitrate the xaviera then the xaviera disembody the madona. If someone is contented and they need the xaviera then the xaviera is loamy. If someone is sectarian then they see the xaviera. The madona disembody the madona.", "logic": "\nContented(xaviera)\nEnshrine(xaviera, madona)\nDisembody(xaviera, madona)\nnot Arbitrate(madona, xaviera)\nnot Loamy(madona)\nInnate(madona)\nEnshrine(madona, xaviera)\nforall x (Disembody(x, madona) -> Enshrine(x, xaviera))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, madona) -> not Contented(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> not Barelegged(x))\nforall x (Disembody(x, xaviera) and Contented(x) -> not Disembody(xaviera, madona))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, xaviera) and Sectarian(x) -> not Disembody(xaviera, madona))\nforall x (Disembody(x, madona) and Arbitrate(madona, xaviera) -> Disembody(xaviera, madona))\nforall x (Contented(x) and Enshrine(x, xaviera) -> Loamy(xaviera))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) -> Disembody(x, xaviera))\n\nDisembody(madona, madona)\n\nDisembody(madona, madona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The rosalind is wrongful. The rosalind awake the jonis. The rosalind despoil the jonis. The jonis does not chase the rosalind. The jonis is not arrhythmic. The jonis is squint. The jonis awake the rosalind. If someone despoil the jonis then they need the rosalind. If someone squirt the jonis then they are not wrongful. If someone is arrhythmic then they are not laotian. If someone despoil the rosalind and they are wrongful then the rosalind does not see the jonis. If someone squirt the rosalind and they are germanic then the rosalind does not see the jonis. If someone despoil the jonis and the jonis squirt the rosalind then the rosalind despoil the jonis. If someone is wrongful and they need the rosalind then the rosalind is arrhythmic. If someone is germanic then they see the rosalind. The rosalind is not germanic.", "logic": "\nWrongful(rosalind)\nAwake(rosalind, jonis)\nDespoil(rosalind, jonis)\nnot Squirt(jonis, rosalind)\nnot Arrhythmic(jonis)\nSquint(jonis)\nAwake(jonis, rosalind)\nforall x (Despoil(x, jonis) -> Awake(x, rosalind))\nforall x (Squirt(x, jonis) -> not Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) -> not Laotian(x))\nforall x (Despoil(x, rosalind) and Wrongful(x) -> not Despoil(rosalind, jonis))\nforall x (Squirt(x, rosalind) and Germanic(x) -> not Despoil(rosalind, jonis))\nforall x (Despoil(x, jonis) and Squirt(jonis, rosalind) -> Despoil(rosalind, jonis))\nforall x (Wrongful(x) and Awake(x, rosalind) -> Arrhythmic(rosalind))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Despoil(x, rosalind))\n\nnot Germanic(rosalind)\n\nnot Germanic(rosalind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The garrott is calibrated. The garrott style the kamila. The garrott smoothen the kamila. The kamila does not chase the garrott. The kamila is not untempting. The kamila is fabricated. The kamila style the garrott. If someone smoothen the kamila then they need the garrott. If someone snowshoe the kamila then they are not calibrated. If someone is untempting then they are not impulsive. If someone smoothen the garrott and they are calibrated then the garrott does not see the kamila. If someone snowshoe the garrott and they are nauseated then the garrott does not see the kamila. If someone smoothen the kamila and the kamila snowshoe the garrott then the garrott smoothen the kamila. If someone is calibrated and they need the garrott then the garrott is untempting. If someone is nauseated then they see the garrott. The garrott is fabricated.", "logic": "\nCalibrated(garrott)\nStyle(garrott, kamila)\nSmoothen(garrott, kamila)\nnot Snowshoe(kamila, garrott)\nnot Untempting(kamila)\nFabricated(kamila)\nStyle(kamila, garrott)\nforall x (Smoothen(x, kamila) -> Style(x, garrott))\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, kamila) -> not Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> not Impulsive(x))\nforall x (Smoothen(x, garrott) and Calibrated(x) -> not Smoothen(garrott, kamila))\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, garrott) and Nauseated(x) -> not Smoothen(garrott, kamila))\nforall x (Smoothen(x, kamila) and Snowshoe(kamila, garrott) -> Smoothen(garrott, kamila))\nforall x (Calibrated(x) and Style(x, garrott) -> Untempting(garrott))\nforall x (Nauseated(x) -> Smoothen(x, garrott))\n\nFabricated(garrott)\n\nFabricated(garrott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The charlena is uppermost. The charlena ablate the corrinne. The charlena appoint the corrinne. The corrinne does not chase the charlena. The corrinne is not rotary. The corrinne is soled. The corrinne ablate the charlena. If someone appoint the corrinne then they need the charlena. If someone ensnare the corrinne then they are not uppermost. If someone is rotary then they are not renewable. If someone appoint the charlena and they are uppermost then the charlena does not see the corrinne. If someone ensnare the charlena and they are medicinal then the charlena does not see the corrinne. If someone appoint the corrinne and the corrinne ensnare the charlena then the charlena appoint the corrinne. If someone is uppermost and they need the charlena then the charlena is rotary. If someone is medicinal then they see the charlena. The corrinne does not chase the corrinne.", "logic": "\nUppermost(charlena)\nAblate(charlena, corrinne)\nAppoint(charlena, corrinne)\nnot Ensnare(corrinne, charlena)\nnot Rotary(corrinne)\nSoled(corrinne)\nAblate(corrinne, charlena)\nforall x (Appoint(x, corrinne) -> Ablate(x, charlena))\nforall x (Ensnare(x, corrinne) -> not Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Rotary(x) -> not Renewable(x))\nforall x (Appoint(x, charlena) and Uppermost(x) -> not Appoint(charlena, corrinne))\nforall x (Ensnare(x, charlena) and Medicinal(x) -> not Appoint(charlena, corrinne))\nforall x (Appoint(x, corrinne) and Ensnare(corrinne, charlena) -> Appoint(charlena, corrinne))\nforall x (Uppermost(x) and Ablate(x, charlena) -> Rotary(charlena))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Appoint(x, charlena))\n\nnot Ensnare(corrinne, corrinne)\n\nnot Ensnare(corrinne, corrinne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "The lewis is nonlethal. The lewis flash the upton. The lewis dispose the upton. The upton does not chase the lewis. The upton is not verified. The upton is piercing. The upton flash the lewis. If someone dispose the upton then they need the lewis. If someone position the upton then they are not nonlethal. If someone is verified then they are not ungenerous. If someone dispose the lewis and they are nonlethal then the lewis does not see the upton. If someone position the lewis and they are coronary then the lewis does not see the upton. If someone dispose the upton and the upton position the lewis then the lewis dispose the upton. If someone is nonlethal and they need the lewis then the lewis is verified. If someone is coronary then they see the lewis. The upton flash the upton.", "logic": "\nNonlethal(lewis)\nFlash(lewis, upton)\nDispose(lewis, upton)\nnot Position(upton, lewis)\nnot Verified(upton)\nPiercing(upton)\nFlash(upton, lewis)\nforall x (Dispose(x, upton) -> Flash(x, lewis))\nforall x (Position(x, upton) -> not Nonlethal(x))\nforall x (Verified(x) -> not Ungenerous(x))\nforall x (Dispose(x, lewis) and Nonlethal(x) -> not Dispose(lewis, upton))\nforall x (Position(x, lewis) and Coronary(x) -> not Dispose(lewis, upton))\nforall x (Dispose(x, upton) and Position(upton, lewis) -> Dispose(lewis, upton))\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) and Flash(x, lewis) -> Verified(lewis))\nforall x (Coronary(x) -> Dispose(x, lewis))\n\nFlash(upton, upton)\n\nFlash(upton, upton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-434"} {"premises": "Tibold is unpeaceful. Jack is gritty. Mitchael is raunchy. Mitchael is gibbous. Mitchael is contagious. Newton is undesired. Newton is gibbous. Newton is contagious. Newton is not unpeaceful. Newton is not vitrified. If someone is vitrified then they are not raunchy. If someone is gritty and undesired then they are raunchy. If Mitchael is gritty and Mitchael is contagious then Mitchael is not vitrified. Big, raunchy people are contagious. Round, raunchy people are gibbous. If Tibold is vitrified then Tibold is not contagious. All gritty people are undesired. If Newton is unpeaceful and Newton is not gibbous then Newton is contagious. Mitchael is raunchy.", "logic": "\nUnpeaceful(tibold)\nGritty(jack)\nRaunchy(mitchael)\nGibbous(mitchael)\nContagious(mitchael)\nUndesired(newton)\nGibbous(newton)\nContagious(newton)\nnot Unpeaceful(newton)\nnot Vitrified(newton)\nforall x (Vitrified(x) -> not Raunchy(x))\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Undesired(x) -> Raunchy(x))\nGritty(mitchael) and Contagious(mitchael) -> not Vitrified(mitchael)\nforall x (Gritty(x) and Raunchy(x) -> Contagious(x))\nforall x (Vitrified(x) and Raunchy(x) -> Gibbous(x))\nVitrified(tibold) -> not Contagious(tibold)\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Undesired(x))\nUnpeaceful(newton) and not Gibbous(newton) -> Contagious(newton)\n\nRaunchy(mitchael)\n\ntherefore Raunchy(mitchael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Krystle is unmarred. Grete is stable. Jermaine is amygdaline. Jermaine is ciliate. Jermaine is grilled. Veriee is slouchy. Veriee is ciliate. Veriee is grilled. Veriee is not unmarred. Veriee is not private. If someone is private then they are not amygdaline. If someone is stable and slouchy then they are amygdaline. If Jermaine is stable and Jermaine is grilled then Jermaine is not private. Big, amygdaline people are grilled. Round, amygdaline people are ciliate. If Krystle is private then Krystle is not grilled. All stable people are slouchy. If Veriee is unmarred and Veriee is not ciliate then Veriee is grilled. Veriee is not ciliate.", "logic": "\nUnmarred(krystle)\nStable(grete)\nAmygdaline(jermaine)\nCiliate(jermaine)\nGrilled(jermaine)\nSlouchy(veriee)\nCiliate(veriee)\nGrilled(veriee)\nnot Unmarred(veriee)\nnot Private(veriee)\nforall x (Private(x) -> not Amygdaline(x))\nforall x (Stable(x) and Slouchy(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\nStable(jermaine) and Grilled(jermaine) -> not Private(jermaine)\nforall x (Stable(x) and Amygdaline(x) -> Grilled(x))\nforall x (Private(x) and Amygdaline(x) -> Ciliate(x))\nPrivate(krystle) -> not Grilled(krystle)\nforall x (Stable(x) -> Slouchy(x))\nUnmarred(veriee) and not Ciliate(veriee) -> Grilled(veriee)\n\nnot Ciliate(veriee)\n\ntherefore Ciliate(veriee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Harley is kosher. Mattias is ministrant. Farica is diaphysial. Farica is unsatiable. Farica is fragmented. Romeo is antrorse. Romeo is unsatiable. Romeo is fragmented. Romeo is not kosher. Romeo is not hired. If someone is hired then they are not diaphysial. If someone is ministrant and antrorse then they are diaphysial. If Farica is ministrant and Farica is fragmented then Farica is not hired. Big, diaphysial people are fragmented. Round, diaphysial people are unsatiable. If Harley is hired then Harley is not fragmented. All ministrant people are antrorse. If Romeo is kosher and Romeo is not unsatiable then Romeo is fragmented. Mattias is antrorse.", "logic": "\nKosher(harley)\nMinistrant(mattias)\nDiaphysial(farica)\nUnsatiable(farica)\nFragmented(farica)\nAntrorse(romeo)\nUnsatiable(romeo)\nFragmented(romeo)\nnot Kosher(romeo)\nnot Hired(romeo)\nforall x (Hired(x) -> not Diaphysial(x))\nforall x (Ministrant(x) and Antrorse(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nMinistrant(farica) and Fragmented(farica) -> not Hired(farica)\nforall x (Ministrant(x) and Diaphysial(x) -> Fragmented(x))\nforall x (Hired(x) and Diaphysial(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nHired(harley) -> not Fragmented(harley)\nforall x (Ministrant(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nKosher(romeo) and not Unsatiable(romeo) -> Fragmented(romeo)\n\nAntrorse(mattias)\n\nMinistrant(mattias) and forall x (Ministrant(x) -> Antrorse(x)) -> therefore Antrorse(mattias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Cordula is monosemous. Christof is nonnative. Othelia is foetal. Othelia is watercress. Othelia is delicate. Dryke is cankerous. Dryke is watercress. Dryke is delicate. Dryke is not monosemous. Dryke is not silent. If someone is silent then they are not foetal. If someone is nonnative and cankerous then they are foetal. If Othelia is nonnative and Othelia is delicate then Othelia is not silent. Big, foetal people are delicate. Round, foetal people are watercress. If Cordula is silent then Cordula is not delicate. All nonnative people are cankerous. If Dryke is monosemous and Dryke is not watercress then Dryke is delicate. Christof is not cankerous.", "logic": "\nMonosemous(cordula)\nNonnative(christof)\nFoetal(othelia)\nWatercress(othelia)\nDelicate(othelia)\nCankerous(dryke)\nWatercress(dryke)\nDelicate(dryke)\nnot Monosemous(dryke)\nnot Silent(dryke)\nforall x (Silent(x) -> not Foetal(x))\nforall x (Nonnative(x) and Cankerous(x) -> Foetal(x))\nNonnative(othelia) and Delicate(othelia) -> not Silent(othelia)\nforall x (Nonnative(x) and Foetal(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Silent(x) and Foetal(x) -> Watercress(x))\nSilent(cordula) -> not Delicate(cordula)\nforall x (Nonnative(x) -> Cankerous(x))\nMonosemous(dryke) and not Watercress(dryke) -> Delicate(dryke)\n\nnot Cankerous(christof)\n\nNonnative(christof) and forall x (Nonnative(x) -> Cankerous(x)) -> therefore Cankerous(christof)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Karin is flaxen. Sherill is muslim. Lynett is frenetic. Lynett is eponymous. Lynett is unscathed. Lissi is auctorial. Lissi is eponymous. Lissi is unscathed. Lissi is not flaxen. Lissi is not shakedown. If someone is shakedown then they are not frenetic. If someone is muslim and auctorial then they are frenetic. If Lynett is muslim and Lynett is unscathed then Lynett is not shakedown. Big, frenetic people are unscathed. Round, frenetic people are eponymous. If Karin is shakedown then Karin is not unscathed. All muslim people are auctorial. If Lissi is flaxen and Lissi is not eponymous then Lissi is unscathed. Sherill is frenetic.", "logic": "\nFlaxen(karin)\nMuslim(sherill)\nFrenetic(lynett)\nEponymous(lynett)\nUnscathed(lynett)\nAuctorial(lissi)\nEponymous(lissi)\nUnscathed(lissi)\nnot Flaxen(lissi)\nnot Shakedown(lissi)\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> not Frenetic(x))\nforall x (Muslim(x) and Auctorial(x) -> Frenetic(x))\nMuslim(lynett) and Unscathed(lynett) -> not Shakedown(lynett)\nforall x (Muslim(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Unscathed(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Eponymous(x))\nShakedown(karin) -> not Unscathed(karin)\nforall x (Muslim(x) -> Auctorial(x))\nFlaxen(lissi) and not Eponymous(lissi) -> Unscathed(lissi)\n\nFrenetic(sherill)\n\nMuslim(sherill) and forall x (Muslim(x) -> Auctorial(x)) -> therefore Auctorial(sherill) Muslim(sherill) and Auctorial(sherill) and forall x (Muslim(x) and Auctorial(x) -> Frenetic(x)) -> therefore Frenetic(sherill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Sophey is vitalizing. Emmie is adaptative. Dianne is barbed. Dianne is unpermed. Dianne is knotted. Eleonore is lighted. Eleonore is unpermed. Eleonore is knotted. Eleonore is not vitalizing. Eleonore is not shoeless. If someone is shoeless then they are not barbed. If someone is adaptative and lighted then they are barbed. If Dianne is adaptative and Dianne is knotted then Dianne is not shoeless. Big, barbed people are knotted. Round, barbed people are unpermed. If Sophey is shoeless then Sophey is not knotted. All adaptative people are lighted. If Eleonore is vitalizing and Eleonore is not unpermed then Eleonore is knotted. Emmie is not barbed.", "logic": "\nVitalizing(sophey)\nAdaptative(emmie)\nBarbed(dianne)\nUnpermed(dianne)\nKnotted(dianne)\nLighted(eleonore)\nUnpermed(eleonore)\nKnotted(eleonore)\nnot Vitalizing(eleonore)\nnot Shoeless(eleonore)\nforall x (Shoeless(x) -> not Barbed(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and Lighted(x) -> Barbed(x))\nAdaptative(dianne) and Knotted(dianne) -> not Shoeless(dianne)\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and Barbed(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Shoeless(x) and Barbed(x) -> Unpermed(x))\nShoeless(sophey) -> not Knotted(sophey)\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Lighted(x))\nVitalizing(eleonore) and not Unpermed(eleonore) -> Knotted(eleonore)\n\nnot Barbed(emmie)\n\nAdaptative(emmie) and forall x (Adaptative(x) -> Lighted(x)) -> therefore Lighted(emmie) Adaptative(emmie) and Lighted(emmie) and forall x (Adaptative(x) and Lighted(x) -> Barbed(x)) -> therefore Barbed(emmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Chiquita is ignescent. Elwira is doctorial. Jannelle is astonished. Jannelle is larboard. Jannelle is sheepish. Antonino is cycloid. Antonino is larboard. Antonino is sheepish. Antonino is not ignescent. Antonino is not deathlike. If someone is deathlike then they are not astonished. If someone is doctorial and cycloid then they are astonished. If Jannelle is doctorial and Jannelle is sheepish then Jannelle is not deathlike. Big, astonished people are sheepish. Round, astonished people are larboard. If Chiquita is deathlike then Chiquita is not sheepish. All doctorial people are cycloid. If Antonino is ignescent and Antonino is not larboard then Antonino is sheepish. Elwira is sheepish.", "logic": "\nIgnescent(chiquita)\nDoctorial(elwira)\nAstonished(jannelle)\nLarboard(jannelle)\nSheepish(jannelle)\nCycloid(antonino)\nLarboard(antonino)\nSheepish(antonino)\nnot Ignescent(antonino)\nnot Deathlike(antonino)\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> not Astonished(x))\nforall x (Doctorial(x) and Cycloid(x) -> Astonished(x))\nDoctorial(jannelle) and Sheepish(jannelle) -> not Deathlike(jannelle)\nforall x (Doctorial(x) and Astonished(x) -> Sheepish(x))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) and Astonished(x) -> Larboard(x))\nDeathlike(chiquita) -> not Sheepish(chiquita)\nforall x (Doctorial(x) -> Cycloid(x))\nIgnescent(antonino) and not Larboard(antonino) -> Sheepish(antonino)\n\nSheepish(elwira)\n\nDoctorial(elwira) and forall x (Doctorial(x) -> Cycloid(x)) -> therefore Cycloid(elwira) Doctorial(elwira) and Cycloid(elwira) and forall x (Doctorial(x) and Cycloid(x) -> Astonished(x)) -> therefore Astonished(elwira) Doctorial(elwira) and Astonished(elwira) and forall x (Doctorial(x) and Astonished(x) -> Sheepish(x)) -> therefore Sheepish(elwira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Sephira is fibrinous. Marve is melodic. Roman is incredible. Roman is knobbly. Roman is allegoric. Aeriel is hick. Aeriel is knobbly. Aeriel is allegoric. Aeriel is not fibrinous. Aeriel is not weaned. If someone is weaned then they are not incredible. If someone is melodic and hick then they are incredible. If Roman is melodic and Roman is allegoric then Roman is not weaned. Big, incredible people are allegoric. Round, incredible people are knobbly. If Sephira is weaned then Sephira is not allegoric. All melodic people are hick. If Aeriel is fibrinous and Aeriel is not knobbly then Aeriel is allegoric. Marve is not allegoric.", "logic": "\nFibrinous(sephira)\nMelodic(marve)\nIncredible(roman)\nKnobbly(roman)\nAllegoric(roman)\nHick(aeriel)\nKnobbly(aeriel)\nAllegoric(aeriel)\nnot Fibrinous(aeriel)\nnot Weaned(aeriel)\nforall x (Weaned(x) -> not Incredible(x))\nforall x (Melodic(x) and Hick(x) -> Incredible(x))\nMelodic(roman) and Allegoric(roman) -> not Weaned(roman)\nforall x (Melodic(x) and Incredible(x) -> Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Weaned(x) and Incredible(x) -> Knobbly(x))\nWeaned(sephira) -> not Allegoric(sephira)\nforall x (Melodic(x) -> Hick(x))\nFibrinous(aeriel) and not Knobbly(aeriel) -> Allegoric(aeriel)\n\nnot Allegoric(marve)\n\nMelodic(marve) and forall x (Melodic(x) -> Hick(x)) -> therefore Hick(marve) Melodic(marve) and Hick(marve) and forall x (Melodic(x) and Hick(x) -> Incredible(x)) -> therefore Incredible(marve) Melodic(marve) and Incredible(marve) and forall x (Melodic(x) and Incredible(x) -> Allegoric(x)) -> therefore Allegoric(marve)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Farrah is salacious. Jannelle is poached. Rodd is excited. Rodd is positivist. Rodd is beakless. Renie is airtight. Renie is positivist. Renie is beakless. Renie is not salacious. Renie is not dishy. If someone is dishy then they are not excited. If someone is poached and airtight then they are excited. If Rodd is poached and Rodd is beakless then Rodd is not dishy. Big, excited people are beakless. Round, excited people are positivist. If Farrah is dishy then Farrah is not beakless. All poached people are airtight. If Renie is salacious and Renie is not positivist then Renie is beakless. Farrah is not airtight.", "logic": "\nSalacious(farrah)\nPoached(jannelle)\nExcited(rodd)\nPositivist(rodd)\nBeakless(rodd)\nAirtight(renie)\nPositivist(renie)\nBeakless(renie)\nnot Salacious(renie)\nnot Dishy(renie)\nforall x (Dishy(x) -> not Excited(x))\nforall x (Poached(x) and Airtight(x) -> Excited(x))\nPoached(rodd) and Beakless(rodd) -> not Dishy(rodd)\nforall x (Poached(x) and Excited(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Dishy(x) and Excited(x) -> Positivist(x))\nDishy(farrah) -> not Beakless(farrah)\nforall x (Poached(x) -> Airtight(x))\nSalacious(renie) and not Positivist(renie) -> Beakless(renie)\n\nnot Airtight(farrah)\n\nforall x (Poached(x) -> Airtight(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Moise is active. Maryrose is myeloid. Nichols is reasoned. Nichols is developing. Nichols is knotted. Trix is indiscreet. Trix is developing. Trix is knotted. Trix is not active. Trix is not unbranched. If someone is unbranched then they are not reasoned. If someone is myeloid and indiscreet then they are reasoned. If Nichols is myeloid and Nichols is knotted then Nichols is not unbranched. Big, reasoned people are knotted. Round, reasoned people are developing. If Moise is unbranched then Moise is not knotted. All myeloid people are indiscreet. If Trix is active and Trix is not developing then Trix is knotted. Maryrose is developing.", "logic": "\nActive(moise)\nMyeloid(maryrose)\nReasoned(nichols)\nDeveloping(nichols)\nKnotted(nichols)\nIndiscreet(trix)\nDeveloping(trix)\nKnotted(trix)\nnot Active(trix)\nnot Unbranched(trix)\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> not Reasoned(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) and Indiscreet(x) -> Reasoned(x))\nMyeloid(nichols) and Knotted(nichols) -> not Unbranched(nichols)\nforall x (Myeloid(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Unbranched(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Developing(x))\nUnbranched(moise) -> not Knotted(moise)\nforall x (Myeloid(x) -> Indiscreet(x))\nActive(trix) and not Developing(trix) -> Knotted(trix)\n\nDeveloping(maryrose)\n\nforall x (Unbranched(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Developing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Gayla is pluperfect. Weber is residual. Valentina is packed. Valentina is forged. Valentina is swedish. Gera is cresson. Gera is forged. Gera is swedish. Gera is not pluperfect. Gera is not bowfront. If someone is bowfront then they are not packed. If someone is residual and cresson then they are packed. If Valentina is residual and Valentina is swedish then Valentina is not bowfront. Big, packed people are swedish. Round, packed people are forged. If Gayla is bowfront then Gayla is not swedish. All residual people are cresson. If Gera is pluperfect and Gera is not forged then Gera is swedish. Gera is not packed.", "logic": "\nPluperfect(gayla)\nResidual(weber)\nPacked(valentina)\nForged(valentina)\nSwedish(valentina)\nCresson(gera)\nForged(gera)\nSwedish(gera)\nnot Pluperfect(gera)\nnot Bowfront(gera)\nforall x (Bowfront(x) -> not Packed(x))\nforall x (Residual(x) and Cresson(x) -> Packed(x))\nResidual(valentina) and Swedish(valentina) -> not Bowfront(valentina)\nforall x (Residual(x) and Packed(x) -> Swedish(x))\nforall x (Bowfront(x) and Packed(x) -> Forged(x))\nBowfront(gayla) -> not Swedish(gayla)\nforall x (Residual(x) -> Cresson(x))\nPluperfect(gera) and not Forged(gera) -> Swedish(gera)\n\nnot Packed(gera)\n\nforall x (Residual(x) and Cresson(x) -> Packed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Bellanca is neural. Janene is crackers. Dulci is standard. Dulci is fictile. Dulci is auric. Phillie is cyanogenic. Phillie is fictile. Phillie is auric. Phillie is not neural. Phillie is not homing. If someone is homing then they are not standard. If someone is crackers and cyanogenic then they are standard. If Dulci is crackers and Dulci is auric then Dulci is not homing. Big, standard people are auric. Round, standard people are fictile. If Bellanca is homing then Bellanca is not auric. All crackers people are cyanogenic. If Phillie is neural and Phillie is not fictile then Phillie is auric. Bellanca is standard.", "logic": "\nNeural(bellanca)\nCrackers(janene)\nStandard(dulci)\nFictile(dulci)\nAuric(dulci)\nCyanogenic(phillie)\nFictile(phillie)\nAuric(phillie)\nnot Neural(phillie)\nnot Homing(phillie)\nforall x (Homing(x) -> not Standard(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) and Cyanogenic(x) -> Standard(x))\nCrackers(dulci) and Auric(dulci) -> not Homing(dulci)\nforall x (Crackers(x) and Standard(x) -> Auric(x))\nforall x (Homing(x) and Standard(x) -> Fictile(x))\nHoming(bellanca) -> not Auric(bellanca)\nforall x (Crackers(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nNeural(phillie) and not Fictile(phillie) -> Auric(phillie)\n\nStandard(bellanca)\n\nforall x (Crackers(x) and Cyanogenic(x) -> Standard(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Doralia is little. Beatrice is setaceous. Sammy is plantar. Sammy is hypertonic. Sammy is legal. Steven is unsalaried. Steven is hypertonic. Steven is legal. Steven is not little. Steven is not gnarly. If someone is gnarly then they are not plantar. If someone is setaceous and unsalaried then they are plantar. If Sammy is setaceous and Sammy is legal then Sammy is not gnarly. Big, plantar people are legal. Round, plantar people are hypertonic. If Doralia is gnarly then Doralia is not legal. All setaceous people are unsalaried. If Steven is little and Steven is not hypertonic then Steven is legal. Doralia is not setaceous.", "logic": "\nLittle(doralia)\nSetaceous(beatrice)\nPlantar(sammy)\nHypertonic(sammy)\nLegal(sammy)\nUnsalaried(steven)\nHypertonic(steven)\nLegal(steven)\nnot Little(steven)\nnot Gnarly(steven)\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> not Plantar(x))\nforall x (Setaceous(x) and Unsalaried(x) -> Plantar(x))\nSetaceous(sammy) and Legal(sammy) -> not Gnarly(sammy)\nforall x (Setaceous(x) and Plantar(x) -> Legal(x))\nforall x (Gnarly(x) and Plantar(x) -> Hypertonic(x))\nGnarly(doralia) -> not Legal(doralia)\nforall x (Setaceous(x) -> Unsalaried(x))\nLittle(steven) and not Hypertonic(steven) -> Legal(steven)\n\nnot Setaceous(doralia)\n\nnot Setaceous(doralia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Aggy is directing. Shirline is affecting. Fowler is flip. Fowler is adoptable. Fowler is anatomic. Emmi is cosmogenic. Emmi is adoptable. Emmi is anatomic. Emmi is not directing. Emmi is not scaled. If someone is scaled then they are not flip. If someone is affecting and cosmogenic then they are flip. If Fowler is affecting and Fowler is anatomic then Fowler is not scaled. Big, flip people are anatomic. Round, flip people are adoptable. If Aggy is scaled then Aggy is not anatomic. All affecting people are cosmogenic. If Emmi is directing and Emmi is not adoptable then Emmi is anatomic. Shirline is scaled.", "logic": "\nDirecting(aggy)\nAffecting(shirline)\nFlip(fowler)\nAdoptable(fowler)\nAnatomic(fowler)\nCosmogenic(emmi)\nAdoptable(emmi)\nAnatomic(emmi)\nnot Directing(emmi)\nnot Scaled(emmi)\nforall x (Scaled(x) -> not Flip(x))\nforall x (Affecting(x) and Cosmogenic(x) -> Flip(x))\nAffecting(fowler) and Anatomic(fowler) -> not Scaled(fowler)\nforall x (Affecting(x) and Flip(x) -> Anatomic(x))\nforall x (Scaled(x) and Flip(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nScaled(aggy) -> not Anatomic(aggy)\nforall x (Affecting(x) -> Cosmogenic(x))\nDirecting(emmi) and not Adoptable(emmi) -> Anatomic(emmi)\n\nScaled(shirline)\n\nScaled(shirline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Kalvin is stray. Fawn is peninsular. Meg is basidial. Meg is gravelly. Meg is corrosive. Madelena is fatless. Madelena is gravelly. Madelena is corrosive. Madelena is not stray. Madelena is not dysgenic. If someone is dysgenic then they are not basidial. If someone is peninsular and fatless then they are basidial. If Meg is peninsular and Meg is corrosive then Meg is not dysgenic. Big, basidial people are corrosive. Round, basidial people are gravelly. If Kalvin is dysgenic then Kalvin is not corrosive. All peninsular people are fatless. If Madelena is stray and Madelena is not gravelly then Madelena is corrosive. Meg is not dysgenic.", "logic": "\nStray(kalvin)\nPeninsular(fawn)\nBasidial(meg)\nGravelly(meg)\nCorrosive(meg)\nFatless(madelena)\nGravelly(madelena)\nCorrosive(madelena)\nnot Stray(madelena)\nnot Dysgenic(madelena)\nforall x (Dysgenic(x) -> not Basidial(x))\nforall x (Peninsular(x) and Fatless(x) -> Basidial(x))\nPeninsular(meg) and Corrosive(meg) -> not Dysgenic(meg)\nforall x (Peninsular(x) and Basidial(x) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Dysgenic(x) and Basidial(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nDysgenic(kalvin) -> not Corrosive(kalvin)\nforall x (Peninsular(x) -> Fatless(x))\nStray(madelena) and not Gravelly(madelena) -> Corrosive(madelena)\n\nnot Dysgenic(meg)\n\nnot Dysgenic(meg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "Josefina is anuric. Anatollo is engaging. Mattie is brittle. Mattie is ichorous. Mattie is solar. Sayre is bladelike. Sayre is ichorous. Sayre is solar. Sayre is not anuric. Sayre is not turbaned. If someone is turbaned then they are not brittle. If someone is engaging and bladelike then they are brittle. If Mattie is engaging and Mattie is solar then Mattie is not turbaned. Big, brittle people are solar. Round, brittle people are ichorous. If Josefina is turbaned then Josefina is not solar. All engaging people are bladelike. If Sayre is anuric and Sayre is not ichorous then Sayre is solar. Anatollo is anuric.", "logic": "\nAnuric(josefina)\nEngaging(anatollo)\nBrittle(mattie)\nIchorous(mattie)\nSolar(mattie)\nBladelike(sayre)\nIchorous(sayre)\nSolar(sayre)\nnot Anuric(sayre)\nnot Turbaned(sayre)\nforall x (Turbaned(x) -> not Brittle(x))\nforall x (Engaging(x) and Bladelike(x) -> Brittle(x))\nEngaging(mattie) and Solar(mattie) -> not Turbaned(mattie)\nforall x (Engaging(x) and Brittle(x) -> Solar(x))\nforall x (Turbaned(x) and Brittle(x) -> Ichorous(x))\nTurbaned(josefina) -> not Solar(josefina)\nforall x (Engaging(x) -> Bladelike(x))\nAnuric(sayre) and not Ichorous(sayre) -> Solar(sayre)\n\nAnuric(anatollo)\n\nAnuric(anatollo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1422"} {"premises": "The smitty is sincere. The smitty is misleading. The smitty levitate the jeffery. The smitty tippytoe the jeffery. The jeffery toddle the smitty. The jeffery is sincere. The jeffery is gluteal. The jeffery is popish. The jeffery is misleading. The jeffery is indocile. If something toddle the jeffery and it is misleading then it tippytoe the smitty. If something is gluteal then it toddle the jeffery. If the smitty tippytoe the jeffery then the smitty levitate the jeffery. If something tippytoe the smitty then the smitty toddle the jeffery. If something tippytoe the jeffery then it tippytoe the smitty. If something levitate the smitty then it tippytoe the jeffery. If the smitty toddle the jeffery and the smitty levitate the jeffery then the smitty is popish. If something tippytoe the smitty then it tippytoe the jeffery. The smitty tippytoe the jeffery.", "logic": "\nSincere(smitty)\nMisleading(smitty)\nLevitate(smitty, jeffery)\nTippytoe(smitty, jeffery)\nToddle(jeffery, smitty)\nSincere(jeffery)\nGluteal(jeffery)\nPopish(jeffery)\nMisleading(jeffery)\nIndocile(jeffery)\nforall x (Toddle(x, jeffery) and Misleading(x) -> Tippytoe(x, smitty))\nforall x (Gluteal(x) -> Toddle(x, jeffery))\nTippytoe(smitty, jeffery) -> Levitate(smitty, jeffery)\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, smitty) -> Toddle(smitty, jeffery))\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, jeffery) -> Tippytoe(x, smitty))\nforall x (Levitate(x, smitty) -> Tippytoe(x, jeffery))\nToddle(smitty, jeffery) and Levitate(smitty, jeffery) -> Popish(smitty)\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, smitty) -> Tippytoe(x, jeffery))\n\nTippytoe(smitty, jeffery)\n\ntherefore Tippytoe(smitty, jeffery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The keriann is disruptive. The keriann is forgiving. The keriann harp the mimi. The keriann drone the mimi. The mimi shimmer the keriann. The mimi is disruptive. The mimi is elementary. The mimi is pictorial. The mimi is forgiving. The mimi is crocketed. If something shimmer the mimi and it is forgiving then it drone the keriann. If something is elementary then it shimmer the mimi. If the keriann drone the mimi then the keriann harp the mimi. If something drone the keriann then the keriann shimmer the mimi. If something drone the mimi then it drone the keriann. If something harp the keriann then it drone the mimi. If the keriann shimmer the mimi and the keriann harp the mimi then the keriann is pictorial. If something drone the keriann then it drone the mimi. The mimi is not elementary.", "logic": "\nDisruptive(keriann)\nForgiving(keriann)\nHarp(keriann, mimi)\nDrone(keriann, mimi)\nShimmer(mimi, keriann)\nDisruptive(mimi)\nElementary(mimi)\nPictorial(mimi)\nForgiving(mimi)\nCrocketed(mimi)\nforall x (Shimmer(x, mimi) and Forgiving(x) -> Drone(x, keriann))\nforall x (Elementary(x) -> Shimmer(x, mimi))\nDrone(keriann, mimi) -> Harp(keriann, mimi)\nforall x (Drone(x, keriann) -> Shimmer(keriann, mimi))\nforall x (Drone(x, mimi) -> Drone(x, keriann))\nforall x (Harp(x, keriann) -> Drone(x, mimi))\nShimmer(keriann, mimi) and Harp(keriann, mimi) -> Pictorial(keriann)\nforall x (Drone(x, keriann) -> Drone(x, mimi))\n\nnot Elementary(mimi)\n\ntherefore Elementary(mimi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The zacharias is afflicted. The zacharias is pervious. The zacharias sing the max. The zacharias prepose the max. The max satirise the zacharias. The max is afflicted. The max is classical. The max is pasteurian. The max is pervious. The max is leaky. If something satirise the max and it is pervious then it prepose the zacharias. If something is classical then it satirise the max. If the zacharias prepose the max then the zacharias sing the max. If something prepose the zacharias then the zacharias satirise the max. If something prepose the max then it prepose the zacharias. If something sing the zacharias then it prepose the max. If the zacharias satirise the max and the zacharias sing the max then the zacharias is pasteurian. If something prepose the zacharias then it prepose the max. The zacharias prepose the zacharias.", "logic": "\nAfflicted(zacharias)\nPervious(zacharias)\nSing(zacharias, max)\nPrepose(zacharias, max)\nSatirise(max, zacharias)\nAfflicted(max)\nClassical(max)\nPasteurian(max)\nPervious(max)\nLeaky(max)\nforall x (Satirise(x, max) and Pervious(x) -> Prepose(x, zacharias))\nforall x (Classical(x) -> Satirise(x, max))\nPrepose(zacharias, max) -> Sing(zacharias, max)\nforall x (Prepose(x, zacharias) -> Satirise(zacharias, max))\nforall x (Prepose(x, max) -> Prepose(x, zacharias))\nforall x (Sing(x, zacharias) -> Prepose(x, max))\nSatirise(zacharias, max) and Sing(zacharias, max) -> Pasteurian(zacharias)\nforall x (Prepose(x, zacharias) -> Prepose(x, max))\n\nPrepose(zacharias, zacharias)\n\nPrepose(zacharias, max) and forall x (Prepose(x, max) -> Prepose(x, zacharias)) -> therefore Prepose(zacharias, zacharias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The astrid is desired. The astrid is scurrying. The astrid form the adora. The astrid deaerate the adora. The adora misapply the astrid. The adora is desired. The adora is verifying. The adora is plumb. The adora is scurrying. The adora is predacious. If something misapply the adora and it is scurrying then it deaerate the astrid. If something is verifying then it misapply the adora. If the astrid deaerate the adora then the astrid form the adora. If something deaerate the astrid then the astrid misapply the adora. If something deaerate the adora then it deaerate the astrid. If something form the astrid then it deaerate the adora. If the astrid misapply the adora and the astrid form the adora then the astrid is plumb. If something deaerate the astrid then it deaerate the adora. The astrid does not see the astrid.", "logic": "\nDesired(astrid)\nScurrying(astrid)\nForm(astrid, adora)\nDeaerate(astrid, adora)\nMisapply(adora, astrid)\nDesired(adora)\nVerifying(adora)\nPlumb(adora)\nScurrying(adora)\nPredacious(adora)\nforall x (Misapply(x, adora) and Scurrying(x) -> Deaerate(x, astrid))\nforall x (Verifying(x) -> Misapply(x, adora))\nDeaerate(astrid, adora) -> Form(astrid, adora)\nforall x (Deaerate(x, astrid) -> Misapply(astrid, adora))\nforall x (Deaerate(x, adora) -> Deaerate(x, astrid))\nforall x (Form(x, astrid) -> Deaerate(x, adora))\nMisapply(astrid, adora) and Form(astrid, adora) -> Plumb(astrid)\nforall x (Deaerate(x, astrid) -> Deaerate(x, adora))\n\nnot Deaerate(astrid, astrid)\n\nDeaerate(astrid, adora) and forall x (Deaerate(x, adora) -> Deaerate(x, astrid)) -> therefore Deaerate(astrid, astrid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The delinda is depletable. The delinda is occlusive. The delinda retrace the tessi. The delinda batch the tessi. The tessi slug the delinda. The tessi is depletable. The tessi is dighted. The tessi is blowzy. The tessi is occlusive. The tessi is riskless. If something slug the tessi and it is occlusive then it batch the delinda. If something is dighted then it slug the tessi. If the delinda batch the tessi then the delinda retrace the tessi. If something batch the delinda then the delinda slug the tessi. If something batch the tessi then it batch the delinda. If something retrace the delinda then it batch the tessi. If the delinda slug the tessi and the delinda retrace the tessi then the delinda is blowzy. If something batch the delinda then it batch the tessi. The delinda slug the tessi.", "logic": "\nDepletable(delinda)\nOcclusive(delinda)\nRetrace(delinda, tessi)\nBatch(delinda, tessi)\nSlug(tessi, delinda)\nDepletable(tessi)\nDighted(tessi)\nBlowzy(tessi)\nOcclusive(tessi)\nRiskless(tessi)\nforall x (Slug(x, tessi) and Occlusive(x) -> Batch(x, delinda))\nforall x (Dighted(x) -> Slug(x, tessi))\nBatch(delinda, tessi) -> Retrace(delinda, tessi)\nforall x (Batch(x, delinda) -> Slug(delinda, tessi))\nforall x (Batch(x, tessi) -> Batch(x, delinda))\nforall x (Retrace(x, delinda) -> Batch(x, tessi))\nSlug(delinda, tessi) and Retrace(delinda, tessi) -> Blowzy(delinda)\nforall x (Batch(x, delinda) -> Batch(x, tessi))\n\nSlug(delinda, tessi)\n\nBatch(delinda, tessi) and forall x (Batch(x, tessi) -> Batch(x, delinda)) -> therefore Batch(delinda, delinda) Batch(delinda, delinda) and forall x (Batch(x, delinda) -> Slug(delinda, tessi)) -> therefore Slug(delinda, tessi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The pattie is jutting. The pattie is nomothetic. The pattie ensile the marni. The pattie detoxify the marni. The marni follow the pattie. The marni is jutting. The marni is leased. The marni is enkindled. The marni is nomothetic. The marni is dipped. If something follow the marni and it is nomothetic then it detoxify the pattie. If something is leased then it follow the marni. If the pattie detoxify the marni then the pattie ensile the marni. If something detoxify the pattie then the pattie follow the marni. If something detoxify the marni then it detoxify the pattie. If something ensile the pattie then it detoxify the marni. If the pattie follow the marni and the pattie ensile the marni then the pattie is enkindled. If something detoxify the pattie then it detoxify the marni. The marni does not see the pattie.", "logic": "\nJutting(pattie)\nNomothetic(pattie)\nEnsile(pattie, marni)\nDetoxify(pattie, marni)\nFollow(marni, pattie)\nJutting(marni)\nLeased(marni)\nEnkindled(marni)\nNomothetic(marni)\nDipped(marni)\nforall x (Follow(x, marni) and Nomothetic(x) -> Detoxify(x, pattie))\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Follow(x, marni))\nDetoxify(pattie, marni) -> Ensile(pattie, marni)\nforall x (Detoxify(x, pattie) -> Follow(pattie, marni))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, marni) -> Detoxify(x, pattie))\nforall x (Ensile(x, pattie) -> Detoxify(x, marni))\nFollow(pattie, marni) and Ensile(pattie, marni) -> Enkindled(pattie)\nforall x (Detoxify(x, pattie) -> Detoxify(x, marni))\n\nnot Detoxify(marni, pattie)\n\nLeased(marni) and forall x (Leased(x) -> Follow(x, marni)) -> therefore Follow(marni, marni) Follow(marni, marni) and Nomothetic(marni) and forall x (Follow(x, marni) and Nomothetic(x) -> Detoxify(x, pattie)) -> therefore Detoxify(marni, pattie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The hanny is lincolnian. The hanny is annoyed. The hanny convalesce the nana. The hanny oxidize the nana. The nana clone the hanny. The nana is lincolnian. The nana is maoist. The nana is meritless. The nana is annoyed. The nana is aspectual. If something clone the nana and it is annoyed then it oxidize the hanny. If something is maoist then it clone the nana. If the hanny oxidize the nana then the hanny convalesce the nana. If something oxidize the hanny then the hanny clone the nana. If something oxidize the nana then it oxidize the hanny. If something convalesce the hanny then it oxidize the nana. If the hanny clone the nana and the hanny convalesce the nana then the hanny is meritless. If something oxidize the hanny then it oxidize the nana. The nana oxidize the nana.", "logic": "\nLincolnian(hanny)\nAnnoyed(hanny)\nConvalesce(hanny, nana)\nOxidize(hanny, nana)\nClone(nana, hanny)\nLincolnian(nana)\nMaoist(nana)\nMeritless(nana)\nAnnoyed(nana)\nAspectual(nana)\nforall x (Clone(x, nana) and Annoyed(x) -> Oxidize(x, hanny))\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> Clone(x, nana))\nOxidize(hanny, nana) -> Convalesce(hanny, nana)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, hanny) -> Clone(hanny, nana))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, nana) -> Oxidize(x, hanny))\nforall x (Convalesce(x, hanny) -> Oxidize(x, nana))\nClone(hanny, nana) and Convalesce(hanny, nana) -> Meritless(hanny)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, hanny) -> Oxidize(x, nana))\n\nOxidize(nana, nana)\n\nMaoist(nana) and forall x (Maoist(x) -> Clone(x, nana)) -> therefore Clone(nana, nana) Clone(nana, nana) and Annoyed(nana) and forall x (Clone(x, nana) and Annoyed(x) -> Oxidize(x, hanny)) -> therefore Oxidize(nana, hanny) Oxidize(nana, hanny) and forall x (Oxidize(x, hanny) -> Oxidize(x, nana)) -> therefore Oxidize(nana, nana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The trudi is hick. The trudi is scentless. The trudi criticize the igor. The trudi comport the igor. The igor goofproof the trudi. The igor is hick. The igor is realised. The igor is made. The igor is scentless. The igor is monitory. If something goofproof the igor and it is scentless then it comport the trudi. If something is realised then it goofproof the igor. If the trudi comport the igor then the trudi criticize the igor. If something comport the trudi then the trudi goofproof the igor. If something comport the igor then it comport the trudi. If something criticize the trudi then it comport the igor. If the trudi goofproof the igor and the trudi criticize the igor then the trudi is made. If something comport the trudi then it comport the igor. The trudi is not made.", "logic": "\nHick(trudi)\nScentless(trudi)\nCriticize(trudi, igor)\nComport(trudi, igor)\nGoofproof(igor, trudi)\nHick(igor)\nRealised(igor)\nMade(igor)\nScentless(igor)\nMonitory(igor)\nforall x (Goofproof(x, igor) and Scentless(x) -> Comport(x, trudi))\nforall x (Realised(x) -> Goofproof(x, igor))\nComport(trudi, igor) -> Criticize(trudi, igor)\nforall x (Comport(x, trudi) -> Goofproof(trudi, igor))\nforall x (Comport(x, igor) -> Comport(x, trudi))\nforall x (Criticize(x, trudi) -> Comport(x, igor))\nGoofproof(trudi, igor) and Criticize(trudi, igor) -> Made(trudi)\nforall x (Comport(x, trudi) -> Comport(x, igor))\n\nnot Made(trudi)\n\nComport(trudi, igor) and forall x (Comport(x, igor) -> Comport(x, trudi)) -> therefore Comport(trudi, trudi) Comport(trudi, trudi) and forall x (Comport(x, trudi) -> Goofproof(trudi, igor)) -> therefore Goofproof(trudi, igor) Goofproof(trudi, igor) and Criticize(trudi, igor) and Goofproof(trudi, igor) and Criticize(trudi, igor) -> Made(trudi) -> therefore Made(trudi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The peg is unhuman. The peg is plus. The peg digress the masha. The peg enshroud the masha. The masha lallygag the peg. The masha is unhuman. The masha is lidded. The masha is oaken. The masha is plus. The masha is occidental. If something lallygag the masha and it is plus then it enshroud the peg. If something is lidded then it lallygag the masha. If the peg enshroud the masha then the peg digress the masha. If something enshroud the peg then the peg lallygag the masha. If something enshroud the masha then it enshroud the peg. If something digress the peg then it enshroud the masha. If the peg lallygag the masha and the peg digress the masha then the peg is oaken. If something enshroud the peg then it enshroud the masha. The masha does not need the masha.", "logic": "\nUnhuman(peg)\nPlus(peg)\nDigress(peg, masha)\nEnshroud(peg, masha)\nLallygag(masha, peg)\nUnhuman(masha)\nLidded(masha)\nOaken(masha)\nPlus(masha)\nOccidental(masha)\nforall x (Lallygag(x, masha) and Plus(x) -> Enshroud(x, peg))\nforall x (Lidded(x) -> Lallygag(x, masha))\nEnshroud(peg, masha) -> Digress(peg, masha)\nforall x (Enshroud(x, peg) -> Lallygag(peg, masha))\nforall x (Enshroud(x, masha) -> Enshroud(x, peg))\nforall x (Digress(x, peg) -> Enshroud(x, masha))\nLallygag(peg, masha) and Digress(peg, masha) -> Oaken(peg)\nforall x (Enshroud(x, peg) -> Enshroud(x, masha))\n\nnot Digress(masha, masha)\n\nnot Digress(masha, masha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The shalne is living. The shalne is cetacean. The shalne illume the rheta. The shalne soften the rheta. The rheta retry the shalne. The rheta is living. The rheta is overarm. The rheta is dreamlike. The rheta is cetacean. The rheta is incredible. If something retry the rheta and it is cetacean then it soften the shalne. If something is overarm then it retry the rheta. If the shalne soften the rheta then the shalne illume the rheta. If something soften the shalne then the shalne retry the rheta. If something soften the rheta then it soften the shalne. If something illume the shalne then it soften the rheta. If the shalne retry the rheta and the shalne illume the rheta then the shalne is dreamlike. If something soften the shalne then it soften the rheta. The shalne retry the shalne.", "logic": "\nLiving(shalne)\nCetacean(shalne)\nIllume(shalne, rheta)\nSoften(shalne, rheta)\nRetry(rheta, shalne)\nLiving(rheta)\nOverarm(rheta)\nDreamlike(rheta)\nCetacean(rheta)\nIncredible(rheta)\nforall x (Retry(x, rheta) and Cetacean(x) -> Soften(x, shalne))\nforall x (Overarm(x) -> Retry(x, rheta))\nSoften(shalne, rheta) -> Illume(shalne, rheta)\nforall x (Soften(x, shalne) -> Retry(shalne, rheta))\nforall x (Soften(x, rheta) -> Soften(x, shalne))\nforall x (Illume(x, shalne) -> Soften(x, rheta))\nRetry(shalne, rheta) and Illume(shalne, rheta) -> Dreamlike(shalne)\nforall x (Soften(x, shalne) -> Soften(x, rheta))\n\nRetry(shalne, shalne)\n\nRetry(shalne, shalne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The billi is canty. The billi is stubborn. The billi cave the mallory. The billi diabolize the mallory. The mallory belay the billi. The mallory is canty. The mallory is unratified. The mallory is adducent. The mallory is stubborn. The mallory is dandyish. If something belay the mallory and it is stubborn then it diabolize the billi. If something is unratified then it belay the mallory. If the billi diabolize the mallory then the billi cave the mallory. If something diabolize the billi then the billi belay the mallory. If something diabolize the mallory then it diabolize the billi. If something cave the billi then it diabolize the mallory. If the billi belay the mallory and the billi cave the mallory then the billi is adducent. If something diabolize the billi then it diabolize the mallory. The billi is not dandyish.", "logic": "\nCanty(billi)\nStubborn(billi)\nCave(billi, mallory)\nDiabolize(billi, mallory)\nBelay(mallory, billi)\nCanty(mallory)\nUnratified(mallory)\nAdducent(mallory)\nStubborn(mallory)\nDandyish(mallory)\nforall x (Belay(x, mallory) and Stubborn(x) -> Diabolize(x, billi))\nforall x (Unratified(x) -> Belay(x, mallory))\nDiabolize(billi, mallory) -> Cave(billi, mallory)\nforall x (Diabolize(x, billi) -> Belay(billi, mallory))\nforall x (Diabolize(x, mallory) -> Diabolize(x, billi))\nforall x (Cave(x, billi) -> Diabolize(x, mallory))\nBelay(billi, mallory) and Cave(billi, mallory) -> Adducent(billi)\nforall x (Diabolize(x, billi) -> Diabolize(x, mallory))\n\nnot Dandyish(billi)\n\nnot Dandyish(billi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The trudie is tumultuous. The trudie is untimbered. The trudie bolster the sylvia. The trudie atrophy the sylvia. The sylvia sire the trudie. The sylvia is tumultuous. The sylvia is squashed. The sylvia is capitular. The sylvia is untimbered. The sylvia is scraggy. If something sire the sylvia and it is untimbered then it atrophy the trudie. If something is squashed then it sire the sylvia. If the trudie atrophy the sylvia then the trudie bolster the sylvia. If something atrophy the trudie then the trudie sire the sylvia. If something atrophy the sylvia then it atrophy the trudie. If something bolster the trudie then it atrophy the sylvia. If the trudie sire the sylvia and the trudie bolster the sylvia then the trudie is capitular. If something atrophy the trudie then it atrophy the sylvia. The trudie is squashed.", "logic": "\nTumultuous(trudie)\nUntimbered(trudie)\nBolster(trudie, sylvia)\nAtrophy(trudie, sylvia)\nSire(sylvia, trudie)\nTumultuous(sylvia)\nSquashed(sylvia)\nCapitular(sylvia)\nUntimbered(sylvia)\nScraggy(sylvia)\nforall x (Sire(x, sylvia) and Untimbered(x) -> Atrophy(x, trudie))\nforall x (Squashed(x) -> Sire(x, sylvia))\nAtrophy(trudie, sylvia) -> Bolster(trudie, sylvia)\nforall x (Atrophy(x, trudie) -> Sire(trudie, sylvia))\nforall x (Atrophy(x, sylvia) -> Atrophy(x, trudie))\nforall x (Bolster(x, trudie) -> Atrophy(x, sylvia))\nSire(trudie, sylvia) and Bolster(trudie, sylvia) -> Capitular(trudie)\nforall x (Atrophy(x, trudie) -> Atrophy(x, sylvia))\n\nSquashed(trudie)\n\nSquashed(trudie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The salli is profitless. The salli is recovering. The salli foreclose the ivy. The salli arrange the ivy. The ivy overclothe the salli. The ivy is profitless. The ivy is balding. The ivy is profound. The ivy is recovering. The ivy is graded. If something overclothe the ivy and it is recovering then it arrange the salli. If something is balding then it overclothe the ivy. If the salli arrange the ivy then the salli foreclose the ivy. If something arrange the salli then the salli overclothe the ivy. If something arrange the ivy then it arrange the salli. If something foreclose the salli then it arrange the ivy. If the salli overclothe the ivy and the salli foreclose the ivy then the salli is profound. If something arrange the salli then it arrange the ivy. The salli does not need the salli.", "logic": "\nProfitless(salli)\nRecovering(salli)\nForeclose(salli, ivy)\nArrange(salli, ivy)\nOverclothe(ivy, salli)\nProfitless(ivy)\nBalding(ivy)\nProfound(ivy)\nRecovering(ivy)\nGraded(ivy)\nforall x (Overclothe(x, ivy) and Recovering(x) -> Arrange(x, salli))\nforall x (Balding(x) -> Overclothe(x, ivy))\nArrange(salli, ivy) -> Foreclose(salli, ivy)\nforall x (Arrange(x, salli) -> Overclothe(salli, ivy))\nforall x (Arrange(x, ivy) -> Arrange(x, salli))\nforall x (Foreclose(x, salli) -> Arrange(x, ivy))\nOverclothe(salli, ivy) and Foreclose(salli, ivy) -> Profound(salli)\nforall x (Arrange(x, salli) -> Arrange(x, ivy))\n\nnot Foreclose(salli, salli)\n\nnot Foreclose(salli, salli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The morse is smoking. The morse is slavonic. The morse unbind the orson. The morse outroar the orson. The orson dimple the morse. The orson is smoking. The orson is quilted. The orson is benthal. The orson is slavonic. The orson is ultimate. If something dimple the orson and it is slavonic then it outroar the morse. If something is quilted then it dimple the orson. If the morse outroar the orson then the morse unbind the orson. If something outroar the morse then the morse dimple the orson. If something outroar the orson then it outroar the morse. If something unbind the morse then it outroar the orson. If the morse dimple the orson and the morse unbind the orson then the morse is benthal. If something outroar the morse then it outroar the orson. The orson unbind the morse.", "logic": "\nSmoking(morse)\nSlavonic(morse)\nUnbind(morse, orson)\nOutroar(morse, orson)\nDimple(orson, morse)\nSmoking(orson)\nQuilted(orson)\nBenthal(orson)\nSlavonic(orson)\nUltimate(orson)\nforall x (Dimple(x, orson) and Slavonic(x) -> Outroar(x, morse))\nforall x (Quilted(x) -> Dimple(x, orson))\nOutroar(morse, orson) -> Unbind(morse, orson)\nforall x (Outroar(x, morse) -> Dimple(morse, orson))\nforall x (Outroar(x, orson) -> Outroar(x, morse))\nforall x (Unbind(x, morse) -> Outroar(x, orson))\nDimple(morse, orson) and Unbind(morse, orson) -> Benthal(morse)\nforall x (Outroar(x, morse) -> Outroar(x, orson))\n\nUnbind(orson, morse)\n\nUnbind(orson, morse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "Jenn is chylous. Fatima is sophomore. Haskell is cathedral. Big things are unhearable. Red things are graceless. Red, failing things are graceless. Furry things are graceless. All unhearable, engaged things are chylous. If something is sophomore then it is graceless. All engaged things are failing. All sophomore things are engaged. Jenn is chylous.", "logic": "\nChylous(jenn)\nSophomore(fatima)\nCathedral(haskell)\nforall x (Engaged(x) -> Unhearable(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Graceless(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) and Failing(x) -> Graceless(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) -> Graceless(x))\nforall x (Unhearable(x) and Engaged(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Sophomore(x) -> Graceless(x))\nforall x (Engaged(x) -> Failing(x))\nforall x (Sophomore(x) -> Engaged(x))\n\nChylous(jenn)\n\ntherefore Chylous(jenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Giraldo is enzymatic. Randall is foamy. Carina is unguided. Big things are empty. Red things are welsh. Red, abstruse things are welsh. Furry things are welsh. All empty, syncretic things are enzymatic. If something is foamy then it is welsh. All syncretic things are abstruse. All foamy things are syncretic. Giraldo is not enzymatic.", "logic": "\nEnzymatic(giraldo)\nFoamy(randall)\nUnguided(carina)\nforall x (Syncretic(x) -> Empty(x))\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Welsh(x))\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) and Abstruse(x) -> Welsh(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) -> Welsh(x))\nforall x (Empty(x) and Syncretic(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Foamy(x) -> Welsh(x))\nforall x (Syncretic(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Foamy(x) -> Syncretic(x))\n\nnot Enzymatic(giraldo)\n\ntherefore Enzymatic(giraldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Carlina is reckless. Berkley is banging. Arianne is unsexy. Big things are choragic. Red things are aphonic. Red, masonic things are aphonic. Furry things are aphonic. All choragic, undamaged things are reckless. If something is banging then it is aphonic. All undamaged things are masonic. All banging things are undamaged. Berkley is undamaged.", "logic": "\nReckless(carlina)\nBanging(berkley)\nUnsexy(arianne)\nforall x (Undamaged(x) -> Choragic(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) -> Aphonic(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) and Masonic(x) -> Aphonic(x))\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Aphonic(x))\nforall x (Choragic(x) and Undamaged(x) -> Reckless(x))\nforall x (Banging(x) -> Aphonic(x))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) -> Masonic(x))\nforall x (Banging(x) -> Undamaged(x))\n\nUndamaged(berkley)\n\nBanging(berkley) and forall x (Banging(x) -> Undamaged(x)) -> therefore Undamaged(berkley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Nealson is prolific. Arlina is scholastic. Patrik is arco. Big things are censorious. Red things are jowly. Red, thornless things are jowly. Furry things are jowly. All censorious, insane things are prolific. If something is scholastic then it is jowly. All insane things are thornless. All scholastic things are insane. Nealson is not jowly.", "logic": "\nProlific(nealson)\nScholastic(arlina)\nArco(patrik)\nforall x (Insane(x) -> Censorious(x))\nforall x (Prolific(x) -> Jowly(x))\nforall x (Prolific(x) and Thornless(x) -> Jowly(x))\nforall x (Arco(x) -> Jowly(x))\nforall x (Censorious(x) and Insane(x) -> Prolific(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Jowly(x))\nforall x (Insane(x) -> Thornless(x))\nforall x (Scholastic(x) -> Insane(x))\n\nnot Jowly(nealson)\n\nProlific(nealson) and forall x (Prolific(x) -> Jowly(x)) -> therefore Jowly(nealson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Myrta is blind. Kirstyn is legendary. Esmeralda is passing. Big things are catkinate. Red things are grotty. Red, ovate things are grotty. Furry things are grotty. All catkinate, desecrated things are blind. If something is legendary then it is grotty. All desecrated things are ovate. All legendary things are desecrated. Kirstyn is ovate.", "logic": "\nBlind(myrta)\nLegendary(kirstyn)\nPassing(esmeralda)\nforall x (Desecrated(x) -> Catkinate(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) and Ovate(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Passing(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Catkinate(x) and Desecrated(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Legendary(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Desecrated(x) -> Ovate(x))\nforall x (Legendary(x) -> Desecrated(x))\n\nOvate(kirstyn)\n\nLegendary(kirstyn) and forall x (Legendary(x) -> Desecrated(x)) -> therefore Desecrated(kirstyn) Desecrated(kirstyn) and forall x (Desecrated(x) -> Ovate(x)) -> therefore Ovate(kirstyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Sayers is shuddering. Leland is objective. Betty is photic. Big things are hieratical. Red things are alate. Red, rash things are alate. Furry things are alate. All hieratical, aegean things are shuddering. If something is objective then it is alate. All aegean things are rash. All objective things are aegean. Leland is not rash.", "logic": "\nShuddering(sayers)\nObjective(leland)\nPhotic(betty)\nforall x (Aegean(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Shuddering(x) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Shuddering(x) and Rash(x) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Aegean(x) -> Shuddering(x))\nforall x (Objective(x) -> Alate(x))\nforall x (Aegean(x) -> Rash(x))\nforall x (Objective(x) -> Aegean(x))\n\nnot Rash(leland)\n\nObjective(leland) and forall x (Objective(x) -> Aegean(x)) -> therefore Aegean(leland) Aegean(leland) and forall x (Aegean(x) -> Rash(x)) -> therefore Rash(leland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Marja is lifelike. Wynn is eudaemonic. Beau is dowerless. Big things are canescent. Red things are niffy. Red, pinnatifid things are niffy. Furry things are niffy. All canescent, emollient things are lifelike. If something is eudaemonic then it is niffy. All emollient things are pinnatifid. All eudaemonic things are emollient. Wynn is lifelike.", "logic": "\nLifelike(marja)\nEudaemonic(wynn)\nDowerless(beau)\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> Canescent(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Pinnatifid(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Dowerless(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Canescent(x) and Emollient(x) -> Lifelike(x))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Emollient(x) -> Pinnatifid(x))\nforall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Emollient(x))\n\nLifelike(wynn)\n\nEudaemonic(wynn) and forall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Emollient(x)) -> therefore Emollient(wynn) Emollient(wynn) and forall x (Emollient(x) -> Canescent(x)) -> therefore Canescent(wynn) Eudaemonic(wynn) and forall x (Eudaemonic(x) -> Emollient(x)) -> therefore Emollient(wynn) Canescent(wynn) and Emollient(wynn) and forall x (Canescent(x) and Emollient(x) -> Lifelike(x)) -> therefore Lifelike(wynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Townie is appealable. Lorrin is awheel. Leigha is anadromous. Big things are heavyset. Red things are nonsocial. Red, fortunate things are nonsocial. Furry things are nonsocial. All heavyset, flickering things are appealable. If something is awheel then it is nonsocial. All flickering things are fortunate. All awheel things are flickering. Lorrin is not appealable.", "logic": "\nAppealable(townie)\nAwheel(lorrin)\nAnadromous(leigha)\nforall x (Flickering(x) -> Heavyset(x))\nforall x (Appealable(x) -> Nonsocial(x))\nforall x (Appealable(x) and Fortunate(x) -> Nonsocial(x))\nforall x (Anadromous(x) -> Nonsocial(x))\nforall x (Heavyset(x) and Flickering(x) -> Appealable(x))\nforall x (Awheel(x) -> Nonsocial(x))\nforall x (Flickering(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Awheel(x) -> Flickering(x))\n\nnot Appealable(lorrin)\n\nAwheel(lorrin) and forall x (Awheel(x) -> Flickering(x)) -> therefore Flickering(lorrin) Flickering(lorrin) and forall x (Flickering(x) -> Heavyset(x)) -> therefore Heavyset(lorrin) Awheel(lorrin) and forall x (Awheel(x) -> Flickering(x)) -> therefore Flickering(lorrin) Heavyset(lorrin) and Flickering(lorrin) and forall x (Heavyset(x) and Flickering(x) -> Appealable(x)) -> therefore Appealable(lorrin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Mae is overland. Pasquale is illusory. Sallyann is foldable. Big things are rayless. Red things are alkaline. Red, anisogamic things are alkaline. Furry things are alkaline. All rayless, gangly things are overland. If something is illusory then it is alkaline. All gangly things are anisogamic. All illusory things are gangly. Sallyann is not rayless.", "logic": "\nOverland(mae)\nIllusory(pasquale)\nFoldable(sallyann)\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) -> Alkaline(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and Anisogamic(x) -> Alkaline(x))\nforall x (Foldable(x) -> Alkaline(x))\nforall x (Rayless(x) and Gangly(x) -> Overland(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Alkaline(x))\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Illusory(x) -> Gangly(x))\n\nnot Rayless(sallyann)\n\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> Rayless(x)) <- forall x (Illusory(x) -> Gangly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Pierce is icky. Adoree is achievable. Kaylil is fineable. Big things are false. Red things are monoclinal. Red, warmed things are monoclinal. Furry things are monoclinal. All false, coplanar things are icky. If something is achievable then it is monoclinal. All coplanar things are warmed. All achievable things are coplanar. Kaylil is warmed.", "logic": "\nIcky(pierce)\nAchievable(adoree)\nFineable(kaylil)\nforall x (Coplanar(x) -> False(x))\nforall x (Icky(x) -> Monoclinal(x))\nforall x (Icky(x) and Warmed(x) -> Monoclinal(x))\nforall x (Fineable(x) -> Monoclinal(x))\nforall x (False(x) and Coplanar(x) -> Icky(x))\nforall x (Achievable(x) -> Monoclinal(x))\nforall x (Coplanar(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Achievable(x) -> Coplanar(x))\n\nWarmed(kaylil)\n\nforall x (Coplanar(x) -> Warmed(x)) <- forall x (Achievable(x) -> Coplanar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Silvia is twenty. Joell is centralist. Nancee is rimless. Big things are dolorous. Red things are looseleaf. Red, endearing things are looseleaf. Furry things are looseleaf. All dolorous, ungrateful things are twenty. If something is centralist then it is looseleaf. All ungrateful things are endearing. All centralist things are ungrateful. Silvia is not ungrateful.", "logic": "\nTwenty(silvia)\nCentralist(joell)\nRimless(nancee)\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Dolorous(x))\nforall x (Twenty(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Twenty(x) and Endearing(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Dolorous(x) and Ungrateful(x) -> Twenty(x))\nforall x (Centralist(x) -> Looseleaf(x))\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Centralist(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\n\nnot Ungrateful(silvia)\n\nforall x (Centralist(x) -> Ungrateful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Seth is ruby. Melina is reechoing. Mela is croatian. Big things are reclusive. Red things are advertent. Red, sublunary things are advertent. Furry things are advertent. All reclusive, vehement things are ruby. If something is reechoing then it is advertent. All vehement things are sublunary. All reechoing things are vehement. Seth is reclusive.", "logic": "\nRuby(seth)\nReechoing(melina)\nCroatian(mela)\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nforall x (Ruby(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Ruby(x) and Sublunary(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Croatian(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) and Vehement(x) -> Ruby(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) -> Vehement(x))\n\nReclusive(seth)\n\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Reclusive(x)) <- forall x (Reechoing(x) -> Vehement(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Rolland is cherished. Walker is perverted. Sylvan is browned. Big things are velvety. Red things are soignee. Red, world things are soignee. Furry things are soignee. All velvety, stocky things are cherished. If something is perverted then it is soignee. All stocky things are world. All perverted things are stocky. Sylvan is not perverted.", "logic": "\nCherished(rolland)\nPerverted(walker)\nBrowned(sylvan)\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> Velvety(x))\nforall x (Cherished(x) -> Soignee(x))\nforall x (Cherished(x) and World(x) -> Soignee(x))\nforall x (Browned(x) -> Soignee(x))\nforall x (Velvety(x) and Stocky(x) -> Cherished(x))\nforall x (Perverted(x) -> Soignee(x))\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> World(x))\nforall x (Perverted(x) -> Stocky(x))\n\nnot Perverted(sylvan)\n\nnot Perverted(sylvan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Halli is benighted. Mead is inviolable. Bride is rejective. Big things are milky. Red things are carotid. Red, handheld things are carotid. Furry things are carotid. All milky, responsive things are benighted. If something is inviolable then it is carotid. All responsive things are handheld. All inviolable things are responsive. Halli is rejective.", "logic": "\nBenighted(halli)\nInviolable(mead)\nRejective(bride)\nforall x (Responsive(x) -> Milky(x))\nforall x (Benighted(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Benighted(x) and Handheld(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Milky(x) and Responsive(x) -> Benighted(x))\nforall x (Inviolable(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Responsive(x) -> Handheld(x))\nforall x (Inviolable(x) -> Responsive(x))\n\nRejective(halli)\n\nRejective(halli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Wit is undamaged. Leanora is outmost. Donovan is umbrella. Big things are sassy. Red things are vagal. Red, literate things are vagal. Furry things are vagal. All sassy, andante things are undamaged. If something is outmost then it is vagal. All andante things are literate. All outmost things are andante. Wit is not outmost.", "logic": "\nUndamaged(wit)\nOutmost(leanora)\nUmbrella(donovan)\nforall x (Andante(x) -> Sassy(x))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) -> Vagal(x))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) and Literate(x) -> Vagal(x))\nforall x (Umbrella(x) -> Vagal(x))\nforall x (Sassy(x) and Andante(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nforall x (Outmost(x) -> Vagal(x))\nforall x (Andante(x) -> Literate(x))\nforall x (Outmost(x) -> Andante(x))\n\nnot Outmost(wit)\n\nnot Outmost(wit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "Wallache is acicular. Finley is polychrome. Cherilyn is exterior. Big things are parthian. Red things are impuissant. Red, acned things are impuissant. Furry things are impuissant. All parthian, wheelless things are acicular. If something is polychrome then it is impuissant. All wheelless things are acned. All polychrome things are wheelless. Finley is exterior.", "logic": "\nAcicular(wallache)\nPolychrome(finley)\nExterior(cherilyn)\nforall x (Wheelless(x) -> Parthian(x))\nforall x (Acicular(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Acicular(x) and Acned(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Exterior(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Parthian(x) and Wheelless(x) -> Acicular(x))\nforall x (Polychrome(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Wheelless(x) -> Acned(x))\nforall x (Polychrome(x) -> Wheelless(x))\n\nExterior(finley)\n\nExterior(finley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1584"} {"premises": "The emmeline is overmodest. The annnora satirise the emmeline. The giffy flitter the annnora. Big people are titanic. If someone enable the emmeline then the emmeline is titanic. If someone is larboard and they eat the emmeline then they like the emmeline. If someone enable the giffy and they are overmodest then the giffy enable the emmeline. If someone satirise the emmeline and they eat the giffy then the emmeline flitter the giffy. If someone enable the giffy then they are titanic. The giffy flitter the annnora.", "logic": "\nOvermodest(emmeline)\nSatirise(annnora, emmeline)\nFlitter(giffy, annnora)\nforall x (Larboard(x) -> Titanic(x))\nforall x (Enable(x, emmeline) -> Titanic(emmeline))\nforall x (Larboard(x) and Flitter(x, emmeline) -> Satirise(x, emmeline))\nforall x (Enable(x, giffy) and Overmodest(x) -> Enable(giffy, emmeline))\nforall x (Satirise(x, emmeline) and Flitter(x, giffy) -> Flitter(emmeline, giffy))\nforall x (Enable(x, giffy) -> Titanic(x))\n\nFlitter(giffy, annnora)\n\ntherefore Flitter(giffy, annnora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4259"} {"premises": "The jaime is lebanese. The anabella camphorate the jaime. The tom glide the anabella. Big people are boxy. If someone allure the jaime then the jaime is boxy. If someone is monoicous and they eat the jaime then they like the jaime. If someone allure the tom and they are lebanese then the tom allure the jaime. If someone camphorate the jaime and they eat the tom then the jaime glide the tom. If someone allure the tom then they are boxy. The jaime is not lebanese.", "logic": "\nLebanese(jaime)\nCamphorate(anabella, jaime)\nGlide(tom, anabella)\nforall x (Monoicous(x) -> Boxy(x))\nforall x (Allure(x, jaime) -> Boxy(jaime))\nforall x (Monoicous(x) and Glide(x, jaime) -> Camphorate(x, jaime))\nforall x (Allure(x, tom) and Lebanese(x) -> Allure(tom, jaime))\nforall x (Camphorate(x, jaime) and Glide(x, tom) -> Glide(jaime, tom))\nforall x (Allure(x, tom) -> Boxy(x))\n\nnot Lebanese(jaime)\n\ntherefore Lebanese(jaime)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4259"} {"premises": "The chrissy is illiterate. The jillana warn the chrissy. The chariot daunt the jillana. Big people are nonwoody. If someone enunciate the chrissy then the chrissy is nonwoody. If someone is slipshod and they eat the chrissy then they like the chrissy. If someone enunciate the chariot and they are illiterate then the chariot enunciate the chrissy. If someone warn the chrissy and they eat the chariot then the chrissy daunt the chariot. If someone enunciate the chariot then they are nonwoody. The chariot is not nonwoody.", "logic": "\nIlliterate(chrissy)\nWarn(jillana, chrissy)\nDaunt(chariot, jillana)\nforall x (Slipshod(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\nforall x (Enunciate(x, chrissy) -> Nonwoody(chrissy))\nforall x (Slipshod(x) and Daunt(x, chrissy) -> Warn(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Enunciate(x, chariot) and Illiterate(x) -> Enunciate(chariot, chrissy))\nforall x (Warn(x, chrissy) and Daunt(x, chariot) -> Daunt(chrissy, chariot))\nforall x (Enunciate(x, chariot) -> Nonwoody(x))\n\nnot Nonwoody(chariot)\n\nforall x (Slipshod(x) -> Nonwoody(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4259"} {"premises": "The dannye is rhapsodic. The ryan bomb the dannye. The julianne cartwheel the ryan. Big people are african. If someone handcolor the dannye then the dannye is african. If someone is dripless and they eat the dannye then they like the dannye. If someone handcolor the julianne and they are rhapsodic then the julianne handcolor the dannye. If someone bomb the dannye and they eat the julianne then the dannye cartwheel the julianne. If someone handcolor the julianne then they are african. The ryan is blue.", "logic": "\nRhapsodic(dannye)\nBomb(ryan, dannye)\nCartwheel(julianne, ryan)\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> African(x))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, dannye) -> African(dannye))\nforall x (Dripless(x) and Cartwheel(x, dannye) -> Bomb(x, dannye))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, julianne) and Rhapsodic(x) -> Handcolor(julianne, dannye))\nforall x (Bomb(x, dannye) and Cartwheel(x, julianne) -> Cartwheel(dannye, julianne))\nforall x (Handcolor(x, julianne) -> African(x))\n\nBlue(ryan)\n\nBlue(ryan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4259"} {"premises": "Ram is shaping. Ram is urban. Ram is not outward. Ram is mortified. Domenico is shaping. Domenico is urban. Domenico is mortuary. Domenico is outward. Domenico is feudatory. Ruthy is shaping. Ruthy is mortuary. Ruthy is mortified. Lay is urban. Lay is outward. Lay is not mortified. All urban people are shaping. If someone is outward then they are mortuary. Ram is shaping.", "logic": "\nShaping(ram)\nUrban(ram)\nnot Outward(ram)\nMortified(ram)\nShaping(domenico)\nUrban(domenico)\nMortuary(domenico)\nOutward(domenico)\nFeudatory(domenico)\nShaping(ruthy)\nMortuary(ruthy)\nMortified(ruthy)\nUrban(lay)\nOutward(lay)\nnot Mortified(lay)\nforall x (Urban(x) -> Shaping(x))\nforall x (Outward(x) -> Mortuary(x))\n\nShaping(ram)\n\ntherefore Shaping(ram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1350"} {"premises": "Lacy is eightfold. Lacy is dismayed. Lacy is not effete. Lacy is executed. Christie is eightfold. Christie is dismayed. Christie is ripping. Christie is effete. Christie is clxxx. Deonne is eightfold. Deonne is ripping. Deonne is executed. Jenna is dismayed. Jenna is effete. Jenna is not executed. All dismayed people are eightfold. If someone is effete then they are ripping. Deonne is not executed.", "logic": "\nEightfold(lacy)\nDismayed(lacy)\nnot Effete(lacy)\nExecuted(lacy)\nEightfold(christie)\nDismayed(christie)\nRipping(christie)\nEffete(christie)\nClxxx(christie)\nEightfold(deonne)\nRipping(deonne)\nExecuted(deonne)\nDismayed(jenna)\nEffete(jenna)\nnot Executed(jenna)\nforall x (Dismayed(x) -> Eightfold(x))\nforall x (Effete(x) -> Ripping(x))\n\nnot Executed(deonne)\n\ntherefore Executed(deonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1350"} {"premises": "Klee is empiric. Klee is cationic. Klee is not abysmal. Klee is suborbital. Pris is empiric. Pris is cationic. Pris is humified. Pris is abysmal. Pris is dynamic. Chadd is empiric. Chadd is humified. Chadd is suborbital. Adella is cationic. Adella is abysmal. Adella is not suborbital. All cationic people are empiric. If someone is abysmal then they are humified. Klee is not humified.", "logic": "\nEmpiric(klee)\nCationic(klee)\nnot Abysmal(klee)\nSuborbital(klee)\nEmpiric(pris)\nCationic(pris)\nHumified(pris)\nAbysmal(pris)\nDynamic(pris)\nEmpiric(chadd)\nHumified(chadd)\nSuborbital(chadd)\nCationic(adella)\nAbysmal(adella)\nnot Suborbital(adella)\nforall x (Cationic(x) -> Empiric(x))\nforall x (Abysmal(x) -> Humified(x))\n\nnot Humified(klee)\n\nforall x (Abysmal(x) -> Humified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1350"} {"premises": "Eleonore is spurious. Eleonore is grizzly. Eleonore is not tagged. Eleonore is hermetic. Llewellyn is spurious. Llewellyn is grizzly. Llewellyn is telephonic. Llewellyn is tagged. Llewellyn is endogenic. Wallas is spurious. Wallas is telephonic. Wallas is hermetic. Dov is grizzly. Dov is tagged. Dov is not hermetic. All grizzly people are spurious. If someone is tagged then they are telephonic. Wallas is tagged.", "logic": "\nSpurious(eleonore)\nGrizzly(eleonore)\nnot Tagged(eleonore)\nHermetic(eleonore)\nSpurious(llewellyn)\nGrizzly(llewellyn)\nTelephonic(llewellyn)\nTagged(llewellyn)\nEndogenic(llewellyn)\nSpurious(wallas)\nTelephonic(wallas)\nHermetic(wallas)\nGrizzly(dov)\nTagged(dov)\nnot Hermetic(dov)\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> Spurious(x))\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Telephonic(x))\n\nTagged(wallas)\n\nTagged(wallas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1350"} {"premises": "The merill bituminise the mei. The merill is treated. The merill apologize the mei. The matthiew apologize the merill. The matthiew apologize the mei. The mei bituminise the matthiew. The mei is scraggly. If something bituminise the merill and the merill bituminise the mei then it apologize the matthiew. If something bituminise the matthiew then the matthiew muck the merill. If something muck the merill then it bituminise the merill. The matthiew apologize the mei.", "logic": "\nBituminise(merill, mei)\nTreated(merill)\nApologize(merill, mei)\nApologize(matthiew, merill)\nApologize(matthiew, mei)\nBituminise(mei, matthiew)\nScraggly(mei)\nforall x (Bituminise(x, merill) and Bituminise(merill, mei) -> Apologize(x, matthiew))\nforall x (Bituminise(x, matthiew) -> Muck(matthiew, merill))\nforall x (Muck(x, merill) -> Bituminise(x, merill))\n\nApologize(matthiew, mei)\n\ntherefore Apologize(matthiew, mei)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The romeo eliminate the merry. The romeo is squarish. The romeo uncrate the merry. The rania uncrate the romeo. The rania uncrate the merry. The merry eliminate the rania. The merry is normative. If something eliminate the romeo and the romeo eliminate the merry then it uncrate the rania. If something eliminate the rania then the rania unstrap the romeo. If something unstrap the romeo then it eliminate the romeo. The merry does not eat the rania.", "logic": "\nEliminate(romeo, merry)\nSquarish(romeo)\nUncrate(romeo, merry)\nUncrate(rania, romeo)\nUncrate(rania, merry)\nEliminate(merry, rania)\nNormative(merry)\nforall x (Eliminate(x, romeo) and Eliminate(romeo, merry) -> Uncrate(x, rania))\nforall x (Eliminate(x, rania) -> Unstrap(rania, romeo))\nforall x (Unstrap(x, romeo) -> Eliminate(x, romeo))\n\nnot Eliminate(merry, rania)\n\ntherefore Eliminate(merry, rania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The kimball scale the edwina. The kimball is prosodic. The kimball beware the edwina. The emmet beware the kimball. The emmet beware the edwina. The edwina scale the emmet. The edwina is bengali. If something scale the kimball and the kimball scale the edwina then it beware the emmet. If something scale the emmet then the emmet vitaminize the kimball. If something vitaminize the kimball then it scale the kimball. The emmet vitaminize the kimball.", "logic": "\nScale(kimball, edwina)\nProsodic(kimball)\nBeware(kimball, edwina)\nBeware(emmet, kimball)\nBeware(emmet, edwina)\nScale(edwina, emmet)\nBengali(edwina)\nforall x (Scale(x, kimball) and Scale(kimball, edwina) -> Beware(x, emmet))\nforall x (Scale(x, emmet) -> Vitaminize(emmet, kimball))\nforall x (Vitaminize(x, kimball) -> Scale(x, kimball))\n\nVitaminize(emmet, kimball)\n\nScale(edwina, emmet) and forall x (Scale(x, emmet) -> Vitaminize(emmet, kimball)) -> therefore Vitaminize(emmet, kimball)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The querida inflate the conan. The querida is eradicable. The querida slough the conan. The daveta slough the querida. The daveta slough the conan. The conan inflate the daveta. The conan is chaste. If something inflate the querida and the querida inflate the conan then it slough the daveta. If something inflate the daveta then the daveta deter the querida. If something deter the querida then it inflate the querida. The daveta does not need the querida.", "logic": "\nInflate(querida, conan)\nEradicable(querida)\nSlough(querida, conan)\nSlough(daveta, querida)\nSlough(daveta, conan)\nInflate(conan, daveta)\nChaste(conan)\nforall x (Inflate(x, querida) and Inflate(querida, conan) -> Slough(x, daveta))\nforall x (Inflate(x, daveta) -> Deter(daveta, querida))\nforall x (Deter(x, querida) -> Inflate(x, querida))\n\nnot Deter(daveta, querida)\n\nInflate(conan, daveta) and forall x (Inflate(x, daveta) -> Deter(daveta, querida)) -> therefore Deter(daveta, querida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The veriee alienate the reg. The veriee is satiric. The veriee trump the reg. The zelig trump the veriee. The zelig trump the reg. The reg alienate the zelig. The reg is gradual. If something alienate the veriee and the veriee alienate the reg then it trump the zelig. If something alienate the zelig then the zelig seclude the veriee. If something seclude the veriee then it alienate the veriee. The zelig alienate the veriee.", "logic": "\nAlienate(veriee, reg)\nSatiric(veriee)\nTrump(veriee, reg)\nTrump(zelig, veriee)\nTrump(zelig, reg)\nAlienate(reg, zelig)\nGradual(reg)\nforall x (Alienate(x, veriee) and Alienate(veriee, reg) -> Trump(x, zelig))\nforall x (Alienate(x, zelig) -> Seclude(zelig, veriee))\nforall x (Seclude(x, veriee) -> Alienate(x, veriee))\n\nAlienate(zelig, veriee)\n\nAlienate(reg, zelig) and forall x (Alienate(x, zelig) -> Seclude(zelig, veriee)) -> therefore Seclude(zelig, veriee) Seclude(zelig, veriee) and forall x (Seclude(x, veriee) -> Alienate(x, veriee)) -> therefore Alienate(zelig, veriee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The jocelin pass the guillema. The jocelin is synchronal. The jocelin pretend the guillema. The brynne pretend the jocelin. The brynne pretend the guillema. The guillema pass the brynne. The guillema is calcareous. If something pass the jocelin and the jocelin pass the guillema then it pretend the brynne. If something pass the brynne then the brynne propose the jocelin. If something propose the jocelin then it pass the jocelin. The brynne does not eat the jocelin.", "logic": "\nPass(jocelin, guillema)\nSynchronal(jocelin)\nPretend(jocelin, guillema)\nPretend(brynne, jocelin)\nPretend(brynne, guillema)\nPass(guillema, brynne)\nCalcareous(guillema)\nforall x (Pass(x, jocelin) and Pass(jocelin, guillema) -> Pretend(x, brynne))\nforall x (Pass(x, brynne) -> Propose(brynne, jocelin))\nforall x (Propose(x, jocelin) -> Pass(x, jocelin))\n\nnot Pass(brynne, jocelin)\n\nPass(guillema, brynne) and forall x (Pass(x, brynne) -> Propose(brynne, jocelin)) -> therefore Propose(brynne, jocelin) Propose(brynne, jocelin) and forall x (Propose(x, jocelin) -> Pass(x, jocelin)) -> therefore Pass(brynne, jocelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The edee welt the pate. The edee is meaningful. The edee corbel the pate. The barnett corbel the edee. The barnett corbel the pate. The pate welt the barnett. The pate is rapturous. If something welt the edee and the edee welt the pate then it corbel the barnett. If something welt the barnett then the barnett transcend the edee. If something transcend the edee then it welt the edee. The barnett corbel the barnett.", "logic": "\nWelt(edee, pate)\nMeaningful(edee)\nCorbel(edee, pate)\nCorbel(barnett, edee)\nCorbel(barnett, pate)\nWelt(pate, barnett)\nRapturous(pate)\nforall x (Welt(x, edee) and Welt(edee, pate) -> Corbel(x, barnett))\nforall x (Welt(x, barnett) -> Transcend(barnett, edee))\nforall x (Transcend(x, edee) -> Welt(x, edee))\n\nCorbel(barnett, barnett)\n\nWelt(pate, barnett) and forall x (Welt(x, barnett) -> Transcend(barnett, edee)) -> therefore Transcend(barnett, edee) Transcend(barnett, edee) and forall x (Transcend(x, edee) -> Welt(x, edee)) -> therefore Welt(barnett, edee) Welt(barnett, edee) and Welt(edee, pate) and forall x (Welt(x, edee) and Welt(edee, pate) -> Corbel(x, barnett)) -> therefore Corbel(barnett, barnett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The thaddus hitch the dacie. The thaddus is canicular. The thaddus tread the dacie. The hubert tread the thaddus. The hubert tread the dacie. The dacie hitch the hubert. The dacie is immutable. If something hitch the thaddus and the thaddus hitch the dacie then it tread the hubert. If something hitch the hubert then the hubert undulate the thaddus. If something undulate the thaddus then it hitch the thaddus. The hubert does not like the hubert.", "logic": "\nHitch(thaddus, dacie)\nCanicular(thaddus)\nTread(thaddus, dacie)\nTread(hubert, thaddus)\nTread(hubert, dacie)\nHitch(dacie, hubert)\nImmutable(dacie)\nforall x (Hitch(x, thaddus) and Hitch(thaddus, dacie) -> Tread(x, hubert))\nforall x (Hitch(x, hubert) -> Undulate(hubert, thaddus))\nforall x (Undulate(x, thaddus) -> Hitch(x, thaddus))\n\nnot Tread(hubert, hubert)\n\nHitch(dacie, hubert) and forall x (Hitch(x, hubert) -> Undulate(hubert, thaddus)) -> therefore Undulate(hubert, thaddus) Undulate(hubert, thaddus) and forall x (Undulate(x, thaddus) -> Hitch(x, thaddus)) -> therefore Hitch(hubert, thaddus) Hitch(hubert, thaddus) and Hitch(thaddus, dacie) and forall x (Hitch(x, thaddus) and Hitch(thaddus, dacie) -> Tread(x, hubert)) -> therefore Tread(hubert, hubert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The gabie transcribe the salomone. The gabie is nonstick. The gabie abrade the salomone. The marietta abrade the gabie. The marietta abrade the salomone. The salomone transcribe the marietta. The salomone is clanking. If something transcribe the gabie and the gabie transcribe the salomone then it abrade the marietta. If something transcribe the marietta then the marietta gangrene the gabie. If something gangrene the gabie then it transcribe the gabie. The gabie does not eat the gabie.", "logic": "\nTranscribe(gabie, salomone)\nNonstick(gabie)\nAbrade(gabie, salomone)\nAbrade(marietta, gabie)\nAbrade(marietta, salomone)\nTranscribe(salomone, marietta)\nClanking(salomone)\nforall x (Transcribe(x, gabie) and Transcribe(gabie, salomone) -> Abrade(x, marietta))\nforall x (Transcribe(x, marietta) -> Gangrene(marietta, gabie))\nforall x (Gangrene(x, gabie) -> Transcribe(x, gabie))\n\nnot Transcribe(gabie, gabie)\n\nforall x (Gangrene(x, gabie) -> Transcribe(x, gabie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The ferdie reflect the sampson. The ferdie is emulous. The ferdie dong the sampson. The harley dong the ferdie. The harley dong the sampson. The sampson reflect the harley. The sampson is priggish. If something reflect the ferdie and the ferdie reflect the sampson then it dong the harley. If something reflect the harley then the harley begrudge the ferdie. If something begrudge the ferdie then it reflect the ferdie. The sampson dong the harley.", "logic": "\nReflect(ferdie, sampson)\nEmulous(ferdie)\nDong(ferdie, sampson)\nDong(harley, ferdie)\nDong(harley, sampson)\nReflect(sampson, harley)\nPriggish(sampson)\nforall x (Reflect(x, ferdie) and Reflect(ferdie, sampson) -> Dong(x, harley))\nforall x (Reflect(x, harley) -> Begrudge(harley, ferdie))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, ferdie) -> Reflect(x, ferdie))\n\nDong(sampson, harley)\n\nforall x (Reflect(x, ferdie) and Reflect(ferdie, sampson) -> Dong(x, harley)) <- forall x (Begrudge(x, ferdie) -> Reflect(x, ferdie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The zack sole the keely. The zack is scaley. The zack review the keely. The shena review the zack. The shena review the keely. The keely sole the shena. The keely is chapped. If something sole the zack and the zack sole the keely then it review the shena. If something sole the shena then the shena brand the zack. If something brand the zack then it sole the zack. The zack does not like the shena.", "logic": "\nSole(zack, keely)\nScaley(zack)\nReview(zack, keely)\nReview(shena, zack)\nReview(shena, keely)\nSole(keely, shena)\nChapped(keely)\nforall x (Sole(x, zack) and Sole(zack, keely) -> Review(x, shena))\nforall x (Sole(x, shena) -> Brand(shena, zack))\nforall x (Brand(x, zack) -> Sole(x, zack))\n\nnot Review(zack, shena)\n\nforall x (Sole(x, zack) and Sole(zack, keely) -> Review(x, shena)) <- forall x (Brand(x, zack) -> Sole(x, zack)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The shalne patrol the fortune. The shalne is soiled. The shalne snorkel the fortune. The christy snorkel the shalne. The christy snorkel the fortune. The fortune patrol the christy. The fortune is unlucky. If something patrol the shalne and the shalne patrol the fortune then it snorkel the christy. If something patrol the christy then the christy aromatise the shalne. If something aromatise the shalne then it patrol the shalne. The fortune patrol the shalne.", "logic": "\nPatrol(shalne, fortune)\nSoiled(shalne)\nSnorkel(shalne, fortune)\nSnorkel(christy, shalne)\nSnorkel(christy, fortune)\nPatrol(fortune, christy)\nUnlucky(fortune)\nforall x (Patrol(x, shalne) and Patrol(shalne, fortune) -> Snorkel(x, christy))\nforall x (Patrol(x, christy) -> Aromatise(christy, shalne))\nforall x (Aromatise(x, shalne) -> Patrol(x, shalne))\n\nPatrol(fortune, shalne)\n\nforall x (Aromatise(x, shalne) -> Patrol(x, shalne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The dinny aggravate the logan. The dinny is unrested. The dinny rest the logan. The guthrie rest the dinny. The guthrie rest the logan. The logan aggravate the guthrie. The logan is amerindic. If something aggravate the dinny and the dinny aggravate the logan then it rest the guthrie. If something aggravate the guthrie then the guthrie collate the dinny. If something collate the dinny then it aggravate the dinny. The logan does not like the dinny.", "logic": "\nAggravate(dinny, logan)\nUnrested(dinny)\nRest(dinny, logan)\nRest(guthrie, dinny)\nRest(guthrie, logan)\nAggravate(logan, guthrie)\nAmerindic(logan)\nforall x (Aggravate(x, dinny) and Aggravate(dinny, logan) -> Rest(x, guthrie))\nforall x (Aggravate(x, guthrie) -> Collate(guthrie, dinny))\nforall x (Collate(x, dinny) -> Aggravate(x, dinny))\n\nnot Rest(logan, dinny)\n\nnot Rest(logan, dinny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The vasilis boast the guthrie. The vasilis is desolate. The vasilis appeal the guthrie. The lory appeal the vasilis. The lory appeal the guthrie. The guthrie boast the lory. The guthrie is proscribed. If something boast the vasilis and the vasilis boast the guthrie then it appeal the lory. If something boast the lory then the lory battle the vasilis. If something battle the vasilis then it boast the vasilis. The guthrie battle the guthrie.", "logic": "\nBoast(vasilis, guthrie)\nDesolate(vasilis)\nAppeal(vasilis, guthrie)\nAppeal(lory, vasilis)\nAppeal(lory, guthrie)\nBoast(guthrie, lory)\nProscribed(guthrie)\nforall x (Boast(x, vasilis) and Boast(vasilis, guthrie) -> Appeal(x, lory))\nforall x (Boast(x, lory) -> Battle(lory, vasilis))\nforall x (Battle(x, vasilis) -> Boast(x, vasilis))\n\nBattle(guthrie, guthrie)\n\nBattle(guthrie, guthrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The maureen monkey the lockwood. The maureen is utmost. The maureen patronise the lockwood. The mason patronise the maureen. The mason patronise the lockwood. The lockwood monkey the mason. The lockwood is hopeless. If something monkey the maureen and the maureen monkey the lockwood then it patronise the mason. If something monkey the mason then the mason fill the maureen. If something fill the maureen then it monkey the maureen. The maureen does not need the maureen.", "logic": "\nMonkey(maureen, lockwood)\nUtmost(maureen)\nPatronise(maureen, lockwood)\nPatronise(mason, maureen)\nPatronise(mason, lockwood)\nMonkey(lockwood, mason)\nHopeless(lockwood)\nforall x (Monkey(x, maureen) and Monkey(maureen, lockwood) -> Patronise(x, mason))\nforall x (Monkey(x, mason) -> Fill(mason, maureen))\nforall x (Fill(x, maureen) -> Monkey(x, maureen))\n\nnot Fill(maureen, maureen)\n\nnot Fill(maureen, maureen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The secunda sneak the sheryl. The secunda is songlike. The secunda wheeze the sheryl. The winny wheeze the secunda. The winny wheeze the sheryl. The sheryl sneak the winny. The sheryl is debonair. If something sneak the secunda and the secunda sneak the sheryl then it wheeze the winny. If something sneak the winny then the winny swathe the secunda. If something swathe the secunda then it sneak the secunda. The sheryl is songlike.", "logic": "\nSneak(secunda, sheryl)\nSonglike(secunda)\nWheeze(secunda, sheryl)\nWheeze(winny, secunda)\nWheeze(winny, sheryl)\nSneak(sheryl, winny)\nDebonair(sheryl)\nforall x (Sneak(x, secunda) and Sneak(secunda, sheryl) -> Wheeze(x, winny))\nforall x (Sneak(x, winny) -> Swathe(winny, secunda))\nforall x (Swathe(x, secunda) -> Sneak(x, secunda))\n\nSonglike(sheryl)\n\nSonglike(sheryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-457"} {"premises": "The skye is trilobate. The skye deterge the jeromy. The jeromy inhabit the skye. If something calcine the jeromy then the jeromy deterge the skye. If something inhabit the jeromy then it is protective. If the jeromy inhabit the skye and the skye deterge the jeromy then the skye inhabit the jeromy. The skye deterge the jeromy.", "logic": "\nTrilobate(skye)\nDeterge(skye, jeromy)\nInhabit(jeromy, skye)\nforall x (Calcine(x, jeromy) -> Deterge(jeromy, skye))\nforall x (Inhabit(x, jeromy) -> Protective(x))\nInhabit(jeromy, skye) and Deterge(skye, jeromy) -> Inhabit(skye, jeromy)\n\nDeterge(skye, jeromy)\n\ntherefore Deterge(skye, jeromy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The eveleen is huffy. The eveleen infiltrate the milicent. The milicent fester the eveleen. If something flaunt the milicent then the milicent infiltrate the eveleen. If something fester the milicent then it is pervasive. If the milicent fester the eveleen and the eveleen infiltrate the milicent then the eveleen fester the milicent. The eveleen is not huffy.", "logic": "\nHuffy(eveleen)\nInfiltrate(eveleen, milicent)\nFester(milicent, eveleen)\nforall x (Flaunt(x, milicent) -> Infiltrate(milicent, eveleen))\nforall x (Fester(x, milicent) -> Pervasive(x))\nFester(milicent, eveleen) and Infiltrate(eveleen, milicent) -> Fester(eveleen, milicent)\n\nnot Huffy(eveleen)\n\ntherefore Huffy(eveleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The ann is prostyle. The ann domicile the mahalia. The mahalia torture the ann. If something gnarl the mahalia then the mahalia domicile the ann. If something torture the mahalia then it is undaunted. If the mahalia torture the ann and the ann domicile the mahalia then the ann torture the mahalia. The ann torture the mahalia.", "logic": "\nProstyle(ann)\nDomicile(ann, mahalia)\nTorture(mahalia, ann)\nforall x (Gnarl(x, mahalia) -> Domicile(mahalia, ann))\nforall x (Torture(x, mahalia) -> Undaunted(x))\nTorture(mahalia, ann) and Domicile(ann, mahalia) -> Torture(ann, mahalia)\n\nTorture(ann, mahalia)\n\nTorture(mahalia, ann) and Domicile(ann, mahalia) and Torture(mahalia, ann) and Domicile(ann, mahalia) -> Torture(ann, mahalia) -> therefore Torture(ann, mahalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The nelly is unfenced. The nelly snooker the eadith. The eadith abound the nelly. If something jack the eadith then the eadith snooker the nelly. If something abound the eadith then it is unshaken. If the eadith abound the nelly and the nelly snooker the eadith then the nelly abound the eadith. The nelly does not visit the eadith.", "logic": "\nUnfenced(nelly)\nSnooker(nelly, eadith)\nAbound(eadith, nelly)\nforall x (Jack(x, eadith) -> Snooker(eadith, nelly))\nforall x (Abound(x, eadith) -> Unshaken(x))\nAbound(eadith, nelly) and Snooker(nelly, eadith) -> Abound(nelly, eadith)\n\nnot Abound(nelly, eadith)\n\nAbound(eadith, nelly) and Snooker(nelly, eadith) and Abound(eadith, nelly) and Snooker(nelly, eadith) -> Abound(nelly, eadith) -> therefore Abound(nelly, eadith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The filide is nonplused. The filide eavesdrop the tana. The tana snack the filide. If something emaciate the tana then the tana eavesdrop the filide. If something snack the tana then it is plumaged. If the tana snack the filide and the filide eavesdrop the tana then the filide snack the tana. The filide is plumaged.", "logic": "\nNonplused(filide)\nEavesdrop(filide, tana)\nSnack(tana, filide)\nforall x (Emaciate(x, tana) -> Eavesdrop(tana, filide))\nforall x (Snack(x, tana) -> Plumaged(x))\nSnack(tana, filide) and Eavesdrop(filide, tana) -> Snack(filide, tana)\n\nPlumaged(filide)\n\nSnack(tana, filide) and Eavesdrop(filide, tana) and Snack(tana, filide) and Eavesdrop(filide, tana) -> Snack(filide, tana) -> therefore Snack(filide, tana) Snack(filide, tana) and forall x (Snack(x, tana) -> Plumaged(x)) -> therefore Plumaged(filide)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The hoyt is affordable. The hoyt blab the deny. The deny callous the hoyt. If something phrase the deny then the deny blab the hoyt. If something callous the deny then it is euphonic. If the deny callous the hoyt and the hoyt blab the deny then the hoyt callous the deny. The hoyt is not euphonic.", "logic": "\nAffordable(hoyt)\nBlab(hoyt, deny)\nCallous(deny, hoyt)\nforall x (Phrase(x, deny) -> Blab(deny, hoyt))\nforall x (Callous(x, deny) -> Euphonic(x))\nCallous(deny, hoyt) and Blab(hoyt, deny) -> Callous(hoyt, deny)\n\nnot Euphonic(hoyt)\n\nCallous(deny, hoyt) and Blab(hoyt, deny) and Callous(deny, hoyt) and Blab(hoyt, deny) -> Callous(hoyt, deny) -> therefore Callous(hoyt, deny) Callous(hoyt, deny) and forall x (Callous(x, deny) -> Euphonic(x)) -> therefore Euphonic(hoyt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The shell is trifid. The shell ablactate the munroe. The munroe lament the shell. If something peptize the munroe then the munroe ablactate the shell. If something lament the munroe then it is monoclonal. If the munroe lament the shell and the shell ablactate the munroe then the shell lament the munroe. The munroe does not like the shell.", "logic": "\nTrifid(shell)\nAblactate(shell, munroe)\nLament(munroe, shell)\nforall x (Peptize(x, munroe) -> Ablactate(munroe, shell))\nforall x (Lament(x, munroe) -> Monoclonal(x))\nLament(munroe, shell) and Ablactate(shell, munroe) -> Lament(shell, munroe)\n\nnot Ablactate(munroe, shell)\n\nforall x (Peptize(x, munroe) -> Ablactate(munroe, shell)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The mahalia is suicidal. The mahalia labialise the greg. The greg reenforce the mahalia. If something fresco the greg then the greg labialise the mahalia. If something reenforce the greg then it is ibsenian. If the greg reenforce the mahalia and the mahalia labialise the greg then the mahalia reenforce the greg. The greg is ibsenian.", "logic": "\nSuicidal(mahalia)\nLabialise(mahalia, greg)\nReenforce(greg, mahalia)\nforall x (Fresco(x, greg) -> Labialise(greg, mahalia))\nforall x (Reenforce(x, greg) -> Ibsenian(x))\nReenforce(greg, mahalia) and Labialise(mahalia, greg) -> Reenforce(mahalia, greg)\n\nIbsenian(greg)\n\nforall x (Reenforce(x, greg) -> Ibsenian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The gabe is secretory. The gabe graze the patrizia. The patrizia misdo the gabe. If something convolute the patrizia then the patrizia graze the gabe. If something misdo the patrizia then it is autophytic. If the patrizia misdo the gabe and the gabe graze the patrizia then the gabe misdo the patrizia. The gabe is not kind.", "logic": "\nSecretory(gabe)\nGraze(gabe, patrizia)\nMisdo(patrizia, gabe)\nforall x (Convolute(x, patrizia) -> Graze(patrizia, gabe))\nforall x (Misdo(x, patrizia) -> Autophytic(x))\nMisdo(patrizia, gabe) and Graze(gabe, patrizia) -> Misdo(gabe, patrizia)\n\nnot Kind(gabe)\n\nnot Kind(gabe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The brendan is coupled. The brendan image the morten. The morten catabolize the brendan. If something truncate the morten then the morten image the brendan. If something catabolize the morten then it is apogametic. If the morten catabolize the brendan and the brendan image the morten then the brendan catabolize the morten. The brendan truncate the brendan.", "logic": "\nCoupled(brendan)\nImage(brendan, morten)\nCatabolize(morten, brendan)\nforall x (Truncate(x, morten) -> Image(morten, brendan))\nforall x (Catabolize(x, morten) -> Apogametic(x))\nCatabolize(morten, brendan) and Image(brendan, morten) -> Catabolize(brendan, morten)\n\nTruncate(brendan, brendan)\n\nTruncate(brendan, brendan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The erich is thenar. The erich dissemble the kellia. The kellia pressure the erich. If something digitize the kellia then the kellia dissemble the erich. If something pressure the kellia then it is docile. If the kellia pressure the erich and the erich dissemble the kellia then the erich pressure the kellia. The kellia does not like the kellia.", "logic": "\nThenar(erich)\nDissemble(erich, kellia)\nPressure(kellia, erich)\nforall x (Digitize(x, kellia) -> Dissemble(kellia, erich))\nforall x (Pressure(x, kellia) -> Docile(x))\nPressure(kellia, erich) and Dissemble(erich, kellia) -> Pressure(erich, kellia)\n\nnot Dissemble(kellia, kellia)\n\nnot Dissemble(kellia, kellia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "The silvain is macaronic. The silvain rhapsodise the valma. The valma hobble the silvain. If something batik the valma then the valma rhapsodise the silvain. If something hobble the valma then it is hypotonic. If the valma hobble the silvain and the silvain rhapsodise the valma then the silvain hobble the valma. The valma batik the valma.", "logic": "\nMacaronic(silvain)\nRhapsodise(silvain, valma)\nHobble(valma, silvain)\nforall x (Batik(x, valma) -> Rhapsodise(valma, silvain))\nforall x (Hobble(x, valma) -> Hypotonic(x))\nHobble(valma, silvain) and Rhapsodise(silvain, valma) -> Hobble(silvain, valma)\n\nBatik(valma, valma)\n\nBatik(valma, valma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2070"} {"premises": "Tandy is basinal. Royce is empathic. Riane is drizzly. If Riane is detected then Riane is hesitating. If Tandy is tartarean and Tandy is not basinal then Tandy is detected. Big things are tartarean. White things are detected. If something is drizzly then it is ventral. If something is detected and drizzly then it is empathic. Smart things are drizzly. If something is basinal and not detected then it is not hesitating. Royce is empathic.", "logic": "\nBasinal(tandy)\nEmpathic(royce)\nDrizzly(riane)\nDetected(riane) -> Hesitating(riane)\nTartarean(tandy) and not Basinal(tandy) -> Detected(tandy)\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Tartarean(x))\nforall x (Empathic(x) -> Detected(x))\nforall x (Drizzly(x) -> Ventral(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) and Drizzly(x) -> Empathic(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Drizzly(x))\nforall x (Basinal(x) and not Detected(x) -> not Hesitating(x))\n\nEmpathic(royce)\n\ntherefore Empathic(royce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Emlynne is costal. Karon is torturous. Derrin is mellow. If Derrin is cleanable then Derrin is incursive. If Emlynne is tricky and Emlynne is not costal then Emlynne is cleanable. Big things are tricky. White things are cleanable. If something is mellow then it is strep. If something is cleanable and mellow then it is torturous. Smart things are mellow. If something is costal and not cleanable then it is not incursive. Karon is not torturous.", "logic": "\nCostal(emlynne)\nTorturous(karon)\nMellow(derrin)\nCleanable(derrin) -> Incursive(derrin)\nTricky(emlynne) and not Costal(emlynne) -> Cleanable(emlynne)\nforall x (Costal(x) -> Tricky(x))\nforall x (Torturous(x) -> Cleanable(x))\nforall x (Mellow(x) -> Strep(x))\nforall x (Cleanable(x) and Mellow(x) -> Torturous(x))\nforall x (Cleanable(x) -> Mellow(x))\nforall x (Costal(x) and not Cleanable(x) -> not Incursive(x))\n\nnot Torturous(karon)\n\ntherefore Torturous(karon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Trenton is copasetic. Rosemary is satyric. Beverly is offensive. If Beverly is anal then Beverly is defending. If Trenton is unlined and Trenton is not copasetic then Trenton is anal. Big things are unlined. White things are anal. If something is offensive then it is oneiric. If something is anal and offensive then it is satyric. Smart things are offensive. If something is copasetic and not anal then it is not defending. Rosemary is anal.", "logic": "\nCopasetic(trenton)\nSatyric(rosemary)\nOffensive(beverly)\nAnal(beverly) -> Defending(beverly)\nUnlined(trenton) and not Copasetic(trenton) -> Anal(trenton)\nforall x (Copasetic(x) -> Unlined(x))\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Anal(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Oneiric(x))\nforall x (Anal(x) and Offensive(x) -> Satyric(x))\nforall x (Anal(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Copasetic(x) and not Anal(x) -> not Defending(x))\n\nAnal(rosemary)\n\nSatyric(rosemary) and forall x (Satyric(x) -> Anal(x)) -> therefore Anal(rosemary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Caspar is patriotic. Hercules is ownerless. Vale is unitary. If Vale is arciform then Vale is thronged. If Caspar is symbolic and Caspar is not patriotic then Caspar is arciform. Big things are symbolic. White things are arciform. If something is unitary then it is stagy. If something is arciform and unitary then it is ownerless. Smart things are unitary. If something is patriotic and not arciform then it is not thronged. Vale is not stagy.", "logic": "\nPatriotic(caspar)\nOwnerless(hercules)\nUnitary(vale)\nArciform(vale) -> Thronged(vale)\nSymbolic(caspar) and not Patriotic(caspar) -> Arciform(caspar)\nforall x (Patriotic(x) -> Symbolic(x))\nforall x (Ownerless(x) -> Arciform(x))\nforall x (Unitary(x) -> Stagy(x))\nforall x (Arciform(x) and Unitary(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Arciform(x) -> Unitary(x))\nforall x (Patriotic(x) and not Arciform(x) -> not Thronged(x))\n\nnot Stagy(vale)\n\nUnitary(vale) and forall x (Unitary(x) -> Stagy(x)) -> therefore Stagy(vale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Odille is scary. Micheal is stomachal. Dianna is elfish. If Dianna is humane then Dianna is brasslike. If Odille is capsular and Odille is not scary then Odille is humane. Big things are capsular. White things are humane. If something is elfish then it is ribbony. If something is humane and elfish then it is stomachal. Smart things are elfish. If something is scary and not humane then it is not brasslike. Micheal is elfish.", "logic": "\nScary(odille)\nStomachal(micheal)\nElfish(dianna)\nHumane(dianna) -> Brasslike(dianna)\nCapsular(odille) and not Scary(odille) -> Humane(odille)\nforall x (Scary(x) -> Capsular(x))\nforall x (Stomachal(x) -> Humane(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) -> Ribbony(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) and Elfish(x) -> Stomachal(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) -> Elfish(x))\nforall x (Scary(x) and not Humane(x) -> not Brasslike(x))\n\nElfish(micheal)\n\nStomachal(micheal) and forall x (Stomachal(x) -> Humane(x)) -> therefore Humane(micheal) Humane(micheal) and forall x (Humane(x) -> Elfish(x)) -> therefore Elfish(micheal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Meredithe is monecious. Bradford is volunteer. Shanie is untimely. If Shanie is spoken then Shanie is canine. If Meredithe is twinning and Meredithe is not monecious then Meredithe is spoken. Big things are twinning. White things are spoken. If something is untimely then it is pubertal. If something is spoken and untimely then it is volunteer. Smart things are untimely. If something is monecious and not spoken then it is not canine. Bradford is not untimely.", "logic": "\nMonecious(meredithe)\nVolunteer(bradford)\nUntimely(shanie)\nSpoken(shanie) -> Canine(shanie)\nTwinning(meredithe) and not Monecious(meredithe) -> Spoken(meredithe)\nforall x (Monecious(x) -> Twinning(x))\nforall x (Volunteer(x) -> Spoken(x))\nforall x (Untimely(x) -> Pubertal(x))\nforall x (Spoken(x) and Untimely(x) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Spoken(x) -> Untimely(x))\nforall x (Monecious(x) and not Spoken(x) -> not Canine(x))\n\nnot Untimely(bradford)\n\nVolunteer(bradford) and forall x (Volunteer(x) -> Spoken(x)) -> therefore Spoken(bradford) Spoken(bradford) and forall x (Spoken(x) -> Untimely(x)) -> therefore Untimely(bradford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Madison is loveable. Ursulina is jolting. Jada is thenal. If Jada is indocile then Jada is dummy. If Madison is allegoric and Madison is not loveable then Madison is indocile. Big things are allegoric. White things are indocile. If something is thenal then it is breezy. If something is indocile and thenal then it is jolting. Smart things are thenal. If something is loveable and not indocile then it is not dummy. Ursulina is breezy.", "logic": "\nLoveable(madison)\nJolting(ursulina)\nThenal(jada)\nIndocile(jada) -> Dummy(jada)\nAllegoric(madison) and not Loveable(madison) -> Indocile(madison)\nforall x (Loveable(x) -> Allegoric(x))\nforall x (Jolting(x) -> Indocile(x))\nforall x (Thenal(x) -> Breezy(x))\nforall x (Indocile(x) and Thenal(x) -> Jolting(x))\nforall x (Indocile(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Loveable(x) and not Indocile(x) -> not Dummy(x))\n\nBreezy(ursulina)\n\nJolting(ursulina) and forall x (Jolting(x) -> Indocile(x)) -> therefore Indocile(ursulina) Indocile(ursulina) and forall x (Indocile(x) -> Thenal(x)) -> therefore Thenal(ursulina) Thenal(ursulina) and forall x (Thenal(x) -> Breezy(x)) -> therefore Breezy(ursulina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Simonette is buttery. Bab is dowdy. Gerianna is jesuitical. If Gerianna is gutsy then Gerianna is dyspneal. If Simonette is multiplied and Simonette is not buttery then Simonette is gutsy. Big things are multiplied. White things are gutsy. If something is jesuitical then it is spicate. If something is gutsy and jesuitical then it is dowdy. Smart things are jesuitical. If something is buttery and not gutsy then it is not dyspneal. Bab is not spicate.", "logic": "\nButtery(simonette)\nDowdy(bab)\nJesuitical(gerianna)\nGutsy(gerianna) -> Dyspneal(gerianna)\nMultiplied(simonette) and not Buttery(simonette) -> Gutsy(simonette)\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> Multiplied(x))\nforall x (Dowdy(x) -> Gutsy(x))\nforall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Spicate(x))\nforall x (Gutsy(x) and Jesuitical(x) -> Dowdy(x))\nforall x (Gutsy(x) -> Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) and not Gutsy(x) -> not Dyspneal(x))\n\nnot Spicate(bab)\n\nDowdy(bab) and forall x (Dowdy(x) -> Gutsy(x)) -> therefore Gutsy(bab) Gutsy(bab) and forall x (Gutsy(x) -> Jesuitical(x)) -> therefore Jesuitical(bab) Jesuitical(bab) and forall x (Jesuitical(x) -> Spicate(x)) -> therefore Spicate(bab)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Garnet is zairese. Torrie is infamous. Gwenora is cuddly. If Gwenora is meridian then Gwenora is pokey. If Garnet is asexual and Garnet is not zairese then Garnet is meridian. Big things are asexual. White things are meridian. If something is cuddly then it is compounded. If something is meridian and cuddly then it is infamous. Smart things are cuddly. If something is zairese and not meridian then it is not pokey. Gwenora is not meridian.", "logic": "\nZairese(garnet)\nInfamous(torrie)\nCuddly(gwenora)\nMeridian(gwenora) -> Pokey(gwenora)\nAsexual(garnet) and not Zairese(garnet) -> Meridian(garnet)\nforall x (Zairese(x) -> Asexual(x))\nforall x (Infamous(x) -> Meridian(x))\nforall x (Cuddly(x) -> Compounded(x))\nforall x (Meridian(x) and Cuddly(x) -> Infamous(x))\nforall x (Meridian(x) -> Cuddly(x))\nforall x (Zairese(x) and not Meridian(x) -> not Pokey(x))\n\nnot Meridian(gwenora)\n\nforall x (Infamous(x) -> Meridian(x)) <- forall x (Meridian(x) and Cuddly(x) -> Infamous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Sheilah is permanent. Gustav is juridical. Aidan is exorbitant. If Aidan is yokelish then Aidan is sworn. If Sheilah is undraped and Sheilah is not permanent then Sheilah is yokelish. Big things are undraped. White things are yokelish. If something is exorbitant then it is albinistic. If something is yokelish and exorbitant then it is juridical. Smart things are exorbitant. If something is permanent and not yokelish then it is not sworn. Gustav is undraped.", "logic": "\nPermanent(sheilah)\nJuridical(gustav)\nExorbitant(aidan)\nYokelish(aidan) -> Sworn(aidan)\nUndraped(sheilah) and not Permanent(sheilah) -> Yokelish(sheilah)\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Juridical(x) -> Yokelish(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Albinistic(x))\nforall x (Yokelish(x) and Exorbitant(x) -> Juridical(x))\nforall x (Yokelish(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) and not Yokelish(x) -> not Sworn(x))\n\nUndraped(gustav)\n\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Undraped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Lyndsey is rotatory. Starr is shingly. Devina is facial. If Devina is unsettled then Devina is lobated. If Lyndsey is lunatic and Lyndsey is not rotatory then Lyndsey is unsettled. Big things are lunatic. White things are unsettled. If something is facial then it is kuwaiti. If something is unsettled and facial then it is shingly. Smart things are facial. If something is rotatory and not unsettled then it is not lobated. Lyndsey is not facial.", "logic": "\nRotatory(lyndsey)\nShingly(starr)\nFacial(devina)\nUnsettled(devina) -> Lobated(devina)\nLunatic(lyndsey) and not Rotatory(lyndsey) -> Unsettled(lyndsey)\nforall x (Rotatory(x) -> Lunatic(x))\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Unsettled(x))\nforall x (Facial(x) -> Kuwaiti(x))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) and Facial(x) -> Shingly(x))\nforall x (Unsettled(x) -> Facial(x))\nforall x (Rotatory(x) and not Unsettled(x) -> not Lobated(x))\n\nnot Facial(lyndsey)\n\nforall x (Unsettled(x) -> Facial(x)) <- forall x (Shingly(x) -> Unsettled(x)) <- forall x (Unsettled(x) and Facial(x) -> Shingly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Sibbie is thinkable. Prescott is ritenuto. Carolyn is binate. If Carolyn is offbeat then Carolyn is infuriated. If Sibbie is owlish and Sibbie is not thinkable then Sibbie is offbeat. Big things are owlish. White things are offbeat. If something is binate then it is plural. If something is offbeat and binate then it is ritenuto. Smart things are binate. If something is thinkable and not offbeat then it is not infuriated. Carolyn is owlish.", "logic": "\nThinkable(sibbie)\nRitenuto(prescott)\nBinate(carolyn)\nOffbeat(carolyn) -> Infuriated(carolyn)\nOwlish(sibbie) and not Thinkable(sibbie) -> Offbeat(sibbie)\nforall x (Thinkable(x) -> Owlish(x))\nforall x (Ritenuto(x) -> Offbeat(x))\nforall x (Binate(x) -> Plural(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) and Binate(x) -> Ritenuto(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) -> Binate(x))\nforall x (Thinkable(x) and not Offbeat(x) -> not Infuriated(x))\n\nOwlish(carolyn)\n\nforall x (Thinkable(x) -> Owlish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Ted is overturned. Zebadiah is cacuminal. Hally is stalkless. If Hally is voluted then Hally is metacarpal. If Ted is exiguous and Ted is not overturned then Ted is voluted. Big things are exiguous. White things are voluted. If something is stalkless then it is niggardly. If something is voluted and stalkless then it is cacuminal. Smart things are stalkless. If something is overturned and not voluted then it is not metacarpal. Ted is not metacarpal.", "logic": "\nOverturned(ted)\nCacuminal(zebadiah)\nStalkless(hally)\nVoluted(hally) -> Metacarpal(hally)\nExiguous(ted) and not Overturned(ted) -> Voluted(ted)\nforall x (Overturned(x) -> Exiguous(x))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) -> Voluted(x))\nforall x (Stalkless(x) -> Niggardly(x))\nforall x (Voluted(x) and Stalkless(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Voluted(x) -> Stalkless(x))\nforall x (Overturned(x) and not Voluted(x) -> not Metacarpal(x))\n\nnot Metacarpal(ted)\n\nnot Metacarpal(ted) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Devonne is bluff. Thane is cackly. Melesa is poor. If Melesa is femoral then Melesa is aurorean. If Devonne is inscribed and Devonne is not bluff then Devonne is femoral. Big things are inscribed. White things are femoral. If something is poor then it is jumbled. If something is femoral and poor then it is cackly. Smart things are poor. If something is bluff and not femoral then it is not aurorean. Melesa is bluff.", "logic": "\nBluff(devonne)\nCackly(thane)\nPoor(melesa)\nFemoral(melesa) -> Aurorean(melesa)\nInscribed(devonne) and not Bluff(devonne) -> Femoral(devonne)\nforall x (Bluff(x) -> Inscribed(x))\nforall x (Cackly(x) -> Femoral(x))\nforall x (Poor(x) -> Jumbled(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) and Poor(x) -> Cackly(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Poor(x))\nforall x (Bluff(x) and not Femoral(x) -> not Aurorean(x))\n\nBluff(melesa)\n\nBluff(melesa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Apostolos is thenar. Tybi is skirting. Huey is motherlike. If Huey is generous then Huey is holophytic. If Apostolos is pyrolignic and Apostolos is not thenar then Apostolos is generous. Big things are pyrolignic. White things are generous. If something is motherlike then it is xcvi. If something is generous and motherlike then it is skirting. Smart things are motherlike. If something is thenar and not generous then it is not holophytic. Tybi is not thenar.", "logic": "\nThenar(apostolos)\nSkirting(tybi)\nMotherlike(huey)\nGenerous(huey) -> Holophytic(huey)\nPyrolignic(apostolos) and not Thenar(apostolos) -> Generous(apostolos)\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Pyrolignic(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) and Motherlike(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Thenar(x) and not Generous(x) -> not Holophytic(x))\n\nnot Thenar(tybi)\n\nnot Thenar(tybi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Renato is dermal. Dorothy is salving. Carlie is singular. If Carlie is sinewy then Carlie is adjustable. If Renato is volunteer and Renato is not dermal then Renato is sinewy. Big things are volunteer. White things are sinewy. If something is singular then it is cubical. If something is sinewy and singular then it is salving. Smart things are singular. If something is dermal and not sinewy then it is not adjustable. Dorothy is adjustable.", "logic": "\nDermal(renato)\nSalving(dorothy)\nSingular(carlie)\nSinewy(carlie) -> Adjustable(carlie)\nVolunteer(renato) and not Dermal(renato) -> Sinewy(renato)\nforall x (Dermal(x) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Sinewy(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Cubical(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Singular(x) -> Salving(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and not Sinewy(x) -> not Adjustable(x))\n\nAdjustable(dorothy)\n\nAdjustable(dorothy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1654"} {"premises": "Rahel is draconian. Brandise is deceased. Franni is deceased. If something is incautious then it is feline. Rough things are incautious. Cold things are unpainted. Brandise is deceased.", "logic": "\nDraconian(rahel)\nDeceased(brandise)\nDeceased(franni)\nforall x (Incautious(x) -> Feline(x))\nforall x (Draconian(x) -> Incautious(x))\nforall x (Feline(x) -> Unpainted(x))\n\nDeceased(brandise)\n\ntherefore Deceased(brandise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Timi is acceptant. Isobel is spoilt. Tad is spoilt. If something is uncolumned then it is occipital. Rough things are uncolumned. Cold things are spoiled. Tad is not spoilt.", "logic": "\nAcceptant(timi)\nSpoilt(isobel)\nSpoilt(tad)\nforall x (Uncolumned(x) -> Occipital(x))\nforall x (Acceptant(x) -> Uncolumned(x))\nforall x (Occipital(x) -> Spoiled(x))\n\nnot Spoilt(tad)\n\ntherefore Spoilt(tad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Venus is smoothened. Ana is improbable. Gonzales is improbable. If something is diminished then it is masoretic. Rough things are diminished. Cold things are grouped. Venus is diminished.", "logic": "\nSmoothened(venus)\nImprobable(ana)\nImprobable(gonzales)\nforall x (Diminished(x) -> Masoretic(x))\nforall x (Smoothened(x) -> Diminished(x))\nforall x (Masoretic(x) -> Grouped(x))\n\nDiminished(venus)\n\nSmoothened(venus) and forall x (Smoothened(x) -> Diminished(x)) -> therefore Diminished(venus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Jeannie is entangled. Malka is ilxx. Norman is ilxx. If something is acceptable then it is outer. Rough things are acceptable. Cold things are awesome. Jeannie is not acceptable.", "logic": "\nEntangled(jeannie)\nIlxx(malka)\nIlxx(norman)\nforall x (Acceptable(x) -> Outer(x))\nforall x (Entangled(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Awesome(x))\n\nnot Acceptable(jeannie)\n\nEntangled(jeannie) and forall x (Entangled(x) -> Acceptable(x)) -> therefore Acceptable(jeannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Brena is alkahestic. Cora is dietetical. Freddie is dietetical. If something is squinting then it is recurrent. Rough things are squinting. Cold things are prefatory. Brena is recurrent.", "logic": "\nAlkahestic(brena)\nDietetical(cora)\nDietetical(freddie)\nforall x (Squinting(x) -> Recurrent(x))\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) -> Squinting(x))\nforall x (Recurrent(x) -> Prefatory(x))\n\nRecurrent(brena)\n\nAlkahestic(brena) and forall x (Alkahestic(x) -> Squinting(x)) -> therefore Squinting(brena) Squinting(brena) and forall x (Squinting(x) -> Recurrent(x)) -> therefore Recurrent(brena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Buck is unselfish. Nisse is wanting. Delcine is wanting. If something is aerobiotic then it is forbearing. Rough things are aerobiotic. Cold things are uninformed. Buck is not forbearing.", "logic": "\nUnselfish(buck)\nWanting(nisse)\nWanting(delcine)\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) -> Forbearing(x))\nforall x (Unselfish(x) -> Aerobiotic(x))\nforall x (Forbearing(x) -> Uninformed(x))\n\nnot Forbearing(buck)\n\nUnselfish(buck) and forall x (Unselfish(x) -> Aerobiotic(x)) -> therefore Aerobiotic(buck) Aerobiotic(buck) and forall x (Aerobiotic(x) -> Forbearing(x)) -> therefore Forbearing(buck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Vasilis is nursed. Elinore is premium. Alan is premium. If something is costless then it is unhurried. Rough things are costless. Cold things are gristly. Vasilis is gristly.", "logic": "\nNursed(vasilis)\nPremium(elinore)\nPremium(alan)\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Unhurried(x))\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Costless(x))\nforall x (Unhurried(x) -> Gristly(x))\n\nGristly(vasilis)\n\nNursed(vasilis) and forall x (Nursed(x) -> Costless(x)) -> therefore Costless(vasilis) Costless(vasilis) and forall x (Costless(x) -> Unhurried(x)) -> therefore Unhurried(vasilis) Unhurried(vasilis) and forall x (Unhurried(x) -> Gristly(x)) -> therefore Gristly(vasilis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Abdullah is austenitic. Lynnet is unusable. Carrissa is unusable. If something is dotted then it is stertorous. Rough things are dotted. Cold things are tegular. Abdullah is not tegular.", "logic": "\nAustenitic(abdullah)\nUnusable(lynnet)\nUnusable(carrissa)\nforall x (Dotted(x) -> Stertorous(x))\nforall x (Austenitic(x) -> Dotted(x))\nforall x (Stertorous(x) -> Tegular(x))\n\nnot Tegular(abdullah)\n\nAustenitic(abdullah) and forall x (Austenitic(x) -> Dotted(x)) -> therefore Dotted(abdullah) Dotted(abdullah) and forall x (Dotted(x) -> Stertorous(x)) -> therefore Stertorous(abdullah) Stertorous(abdullah) and forall x (Stertorous(x) -> Tegular(x)) -> therefore Tegular(abdullah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Tilda is seemly. Sianna is attached. Hadria is attached. If something is embryonal then it is polished. Rough things are embryonal. Cold things are cetaceous. Hadria is not polished.", "logic": "\nSeemly(tilda)\nAttached(sianna)\nAttached(hadria)\nforall x (Embryonal(x) -> Polished(x))\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> Embryonal(x))\nforall x (Polished(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\n\nnot Polished(hadria)\n\nforall x (Embryonal(x) -> Polished(x)) <- forall x (Seemly(x) -> Embryonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Danila is maleficent. Pavia is ascensive. Lenard is ascensive. If something is semilunar then it is vaccinated. Rough things are semilunar. Cold things are desultory. Lenard is semilunar.", "logic": "\nMaleficent(danila)\nAscensive(pavia)\nAscensive(lenard)\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Maleficent(x) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Desultory(x))\n\nSemilunar(lenard)\n\nforall x (Maleficent(x) -> Semilunar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Queada is lanate. Mary is irrational. Munmro is irrational. If something is spent then it is cleanly. Rough things are spent. Cold things are humped. Mary is not humped.", "logic": "\nLanate(queada)\nIrrational(mary)\nIrrational(munmro)\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Cleanly(x))\nforall x (Lanate(x) -> Spent(x))\nforall x (Cleanly(x) -> Humped(x))\n\nnot Humped(mary)\n\nforall x (Cleanly(x) -> Humped(x)) <- forall x (Spent(x) -> Cleanly(x)) <- forall x (Lanate(x) -> Spent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Nadiya is aerobiotic. Abigael is fragrant. Dina is fragrant. If something is middlemost then it is stippled. Rough things are middlemost. Cold things are tactile. Dina is tactile.", "logic": "\nAerobiotic(nadiya)\nFragrant(abigael)\nFragrant(dina)\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Stippled(x))\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Tactile(x))\n\nTactile(dina)\n\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Tactile(x)) <- forall x (Middlemost(x) -> Stippled(x)) <- forall x (Aerobiotic(x) -> Middlemost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Mandy is ducal. Kenn is abashed. Bryana is abashed. If something is centenary then it is mongolian. Rough things are centenary. Cold things are blockaded. Bryana is not kind.", "logic": "\nDucal(mandy)\nAbashed(kenn)\nAbashed(bryana)\nforall x (Centenary(x) -> Mongolian(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) -> Centenary(x))\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Blockaded(x))\n\nnot Kind(bryana)\n\nnot Kind(bryana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Gere is australian. Elwin is beefy. Kameko is beefy. If something is phosphoric then it is clueless. Rough things are phosphoric. Cold things are teutonic. Kameko is australian.", "logic": "\nAustralian(gere)\nBeefy(elwin)\nBeefy(kameko)\nforall x (Phosphoric(x) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Australian(x) -> Phosphoric(x))\nforall x (Clueless(x) -> Teutonic(x))\n\nAustralian(kameko)\n\nAustralian(kameko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Judd is epizoic. Lazaro is unopened. Burgess is unopened. If something is vapourific then it is viewless. Rough things are vapourific. Cold things are emaciated. Burgess is not big.", "logic": "\nEpizoic(judd)\nUnopened(lazaro)\nUnopened(burgess)\nforall x (Vapourific(x) -> Viewless(x))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Vapourific(x))\nforall x (Viewless(x) -> Emaciated(x))\n\nnot Big(burgess)\n\nnot Big(burgess) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Thorn is iffy. Perceval is shot. Gerrard is shot. If something is assailable then it is gormless. Rough things are assailable. Cold things are uveous. Thorn is kind.", "logic": "\nIffy(thorn)\nShot(perceval)\nShot(gerrard)\nforall x (Assailable(x) -> Gormless(x))\nforall x (Iffy(x) -> Assailable(x))\nforall x (Gormless(x) -> Uveous(x))\n\nKind(thorn)\n\nKind(thorn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-686"} {"premises": "Jannelle is canary. Jannelle is elflike. Jannelle is not lettered. Jannelle is not parvenue. Cathlene is palpatory. Cathlene is elflike. Cathlene is lettered. Cathlene is shivering. Geralda is elflike. Thebault is elflike. Thebault is not lettered. Thebault is parvenue. All lettered things are not fewer. If Jannelle is shivering and Jannelle is lettered then Jannelle is not elflike. All elflike things are canary. Round, parvenue things are canary. If Geralda is elflike and Geralda is shivering then Geralda is lettered. If something is lettered and not elflike then it is palpatory. Jannelle is not parvenue.", "logic": "\nCanary(jannelle)\nElflike(jannelle)\nnot Lettered(jannelle)\nnot Parvenue(jannelle)\nPalpatory(cathlene)\nElflike(cathlene)\nLettered(cathlene)\nShivering(cathlene)\nElflike(geralda)\nElflike(thebault)\nnot Lettered(thebault)\nParvenue(thebault)\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> not Fewer(x))\nShivering(jannelle) and Lettered(jannelle) -> not Elflike(jannelle)\nforall x (Elflike(x) -> Canary(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Parvenue(x) -> Canary(x))\nElflike(geralda) and Shivering(geralda) -> Lettered(geralda)\nforall x (Lettered(x) and not Elflike(x) -> Palpatory(x))\n\nnot Parvenue(jannelle)\n\ntherefore not Parvenue(jannelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4893"} {"premises": "Goldie is chiasmal. Goldie is flowerless. Goldie is not nutlike. Goldie is not decorative. Tedda is histrionic. Tedda is flowerless. Tedda is nutlike. Tedda is synonymous. Odelia is flowerless. Cecelia is flowerless. Cecelia is not nutlike. Cecelia is decorative. All nutlike things are not slight. If Goldie is synonymous and Goldie is nutlike then Goldie is not flowerless. All flowerless things are chiasmal. Round, decorative things are chiasmal. If Odelia is flowerless and Odelia is synonymous then Odelia is nutlike. If something is nutlike and not flowerless then it is histrionic. Cecelia is not flowerless.", "logic": "\nChiasmal(goldie)\nFlowerless(goldie)\nnot Nutlike(goldie)\nnot Decorative(goldie)\nHistrionic(tedda)\nFlowerless(tedda)\nNutlike(tedda)\nSynonymous(tedda)\nFlowerless(odelia)\nFlowerless(cecelia)\nnot Nutlike(cecelia)\nDecorative(cecelia)\nforall x (Nutlike(x) -> not Slight(x))\nSynonymous(goldie) and Nutlike(goldie) -> not Flowerless(goldie)\nforall x (Flowerless(x) -> Chiasmal(x))\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Decorative(x) -> Chiasmal(x))\nFlowerless(odelia) and Synonymous(odelia) -> Nutlike(odelia)\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and not Flowerless(x) -> Histrionic(x))\n\nnot Flowerless(cecelia)\n\ntherefore Flowerless(cecelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4893"} {"premises": "Mellisent is peccable. Mellisent is bouncing. Mellisent is not piffling. Mellisent is not imperial. Tonie is agrestic. Tonie is bouncing. Tonie is piffling. Tonie is beakless. Jeri is bouncing. Amelina is bouncing. Amelina is not piffling. Amelina is imperial. All piffling things are not liveried. If Mellisent is beakless and Mellisent is piffling then Mellisent is not bouncing. All bouncing things are peccable. Round, imperial things are peccable. If Jeri is bouncing and Jeri is beakless then Jeri is piffling. If something is piffling and not bouncing then it is agrestic. Amelina is not agrestic.", "logic": "\nPeccable(mellisent)\nBouncing(mellisent)\nnot Piffling(mellisent)\nnot Imperial(mellisent)\nAgrestic(tonie)\nBouncing(tonie)\nPiffling(tonie)\nBeakless(tonie)\nBouncing(jeri)\nBouncing(amelina)\nnot Piffling(amelina)\nImperial(amelina)\nforall x (Piffling(x) -> not Liveried(x))\nBeakless(mellisent) and Piffling(mellisent) -> not Bouncing(mellisent)\nforall x (Bouncing(x) -> Peccable(x))\nforall x (Piffling(x) and Imperial(x) -> Peccable(x))\nBouncing(jeri) and Beakless(jeri) -> Piffling(jeri)\nforall x (Piffling(x) and not Bouncing(x) -> Agrestic(x))\n\nnot Agrestic(amelina)\n\nforall x (Piffling(x) and not Bouncing(x) -> Agrestic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4893"} {"premises": "Hortensia is enlarged. Hortensia is acute. Hortensia is not araneidan. Hortensia is not fourteenth. Trixi is mimetic. Trixi is acute. Trixi is araneidan. Trixi is paintable. Tana is acute. Renaldo is acute. Renaldo is not araneidan. Renaldo is fourteenth. All araneidan things are not fitful. If Hortensia is paintable and Hortensia is araneidan then Hortensia is not acute. All acute things are enlarged. Round, fourteenth things are enlarged. If Tana is acute and Tana is paintable then Tana is araneidan. If something is araneidan and not acute then it is mimetic. Renaldo is paintable.", "logic": "\nEnlarged(hortensia)\nAcute(hortensia)\nnot Araneidan(hortensia)\nnot Fourteenth(hortensia)\nMimetic(trixi)\nAcute(trixi)\nAraneidan(trixi)\nPaintable(trixi)\nAcute(tana)\nAcute(renaldo)\nnot Araneidan(renaldo)\nFourteenth(renaldo)\nforall x (Araneidan(x) -> not Fitful(x))\nPaintable(hortensia) and Araneidan(hortensia) -> not Acute(hortensia)\nforall x (Acute(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nforall x (Araneidan(x) and Fourteenth(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nAcute(tana) and Paintable(tana) -> Araneidan(tana)\nforall x (Araneidan(x) and not Acute(x) -> Mimetic(x))\n\nPaintable(renaldo)\n\nPaintable(renaldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4893"} {"premises": "Aurlie is not ateleiotic. Evanne is aeriferous. Ricki is ateleiotic. Edward is not kooky. If Ricki is deceptive then Ricki is polygonal. All ateleiotic people are kooky. All fathomable people are aeriferous. White people are aeriferous. All kooky people are fathomable. If someone is biweekly and polygonal then they are deceptive. Ricki is ateleiotic.", "logic": "\nnot Ateleiotic(aurlie)\nAeriferous(evanne)\nAteleiotic(ricki)\nnot Kooky(edward)\nDeceptive(ricki) -> Polygonal(ricki)\nforall x (Ateleiotic(x) -> Kooky(x))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nforall x (Polygonal(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\nforall x (Kooky(x) -> Fathomable(x))\nforall x (Biweekly(x) and Polygonal(x) -> Deceptive(x))\n\nAteleiotic(ricki)\n\ntherefore Ateleiotic(ricki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Karalee is not rugose. Lamb is dented. Richy is rugose. Gabi is not nonmoving. If Richy is coastal then Richy is alterable. All rugose people are nonmoving. All sheepish people are dented. White people are dented. All nonmoving people are sheepish. If someone is mangled and alterable then they are coastal. Richy is not rugose.", "logic": "\nnot Rugose(karalee)\nDented(lamb)\nRugose(richy)\nnot Nonmoving(gabi)\nCoastal(richy) -> Alterable(richy)\nforall x (Rugose(x) -> Nonmoving(x))\nforall x (Sheepish(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Alterable(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Nonmoving(x) -> Sheepish(x))\nforall x (Mangled(x) and Alterable(x) -> Coastal(x))\n\nnot Rugose(richy)\n\ntherefore Rugose(richy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Stevana is not simulated. Leonard is misbegot. Karlen is simulated. Nanette is not caudated. If Karlen is anoxic then Karlen is geologic. All simulated people are caudated. All footed people are misbegot. White people are misbegot. All caudated people are footed. If someone is cuspidal and geologic then they are anoxic. Karlen is caudated.", "logic": "\nnot Simulated(stevana)\nMisbegot(leonard)\nSimulated(karlen)\nnot Caudated(nanette)\nAnoxic(karlen) -> Geologic(karlen)\nforall x (Simulated(x) -> Caudated(x))\nforall x (Footed(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Geologic(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Caudated(x) -> Footed(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Geologic(x) -> Anoxic(x))\n\nCaudated(karlen)\n\nSimulated(karlen) and forall x (Simulated(x) -> Caudated(x)) -> therefore Caudated(karlen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Tomasina is not avowed. Marco is port. Vernice is avowed. Crista is not martial. If Vernice is awless then Vernice is flickering. All avowed people are martial. All demoniacal people are port. White people are port. All martial people are demoniacal. If someone is lienal and flickering then they are awless. Vernice is not martial.", "logic": "\nnot Avowed(tomasina)\nPort(marco)\nAvowed(vernice)\nnot Martial(crista)\nAwless(vernice) -> Flickering(vernice)\nforall x (Avowed(x) -> Martial(x))\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) -> Port(x))\nforall x (Flickering(x) -> Port(x))\nforall x (Martial(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) and Flickering(x) -> Awless(x))\n\nnot Martial(vernice)\n\nAvowed(vernice) and forall x (Avowed(x) -> Martial(x)) -> therefore Martial(vernice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Jessee is not cubital. Dannie is tortuous. Theadora is cubital. Cob is not soundless. If Theadora is affirmable then Theadora is unclaimed. All cubital people are soundless. All spirituous people are tortuous. White people are tortuous. All soundless people are spirituous. If someone is fulgid and unclaimed then they are affirmable. Theadora is spirituous.", "logic": "\nnot Cubital(jessee)\nTortuous(dannie)\nCubital(theadora)\nnot Soundless(cob)\nAffirmable(theadora) -> Unclaimed(theadora)\nforall x (Cubital(x) -> Soundless(x))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Soundless(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) and Unclaimed(x) -> Affirmable(x))\n\nSpirituous(theadora)\n\nCubital(theadora) and forall x (Cubital(x) -> Soundless(x)) -> therefore Soundless(theadora) Soundless(theadora) and forall x (Soundless(x) -> Spirituous(x)) -> therefore Spirituous(theadora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Keriann is not civilized. Konstanze is laborious. Idette is civilized. Morton is not fledgeling. If Idette is flabby then Idette is wounding. All civilized people are fledgeling. All argentous people are laborious. White people are laborious. All fledgeling people are argentous. If someone is godly and wounding then they are flabby. Idette is not argentous.", "logic": "\nnot Civilized(keriann)\nLaborious(konstanze)\nCivilized(idette)\nnot Fledgeling(morton)\nFlabby(idette) -> Wounding(idette)\nforall x (Civilized(x) -> Fledgeling(x))\nforall x (Argentous(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Wounding(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) -> Argentous(x))\nforall x (Godly(x) and Wounding(x) -> Flabby(x))\n\nnot Argentous(idette)\n\nCivilized(idette) and forall x (Civilized(x) -> Fledgeling(x)) -> therefore Fledgeling(idette) Fledgeling(idette) and forall x (Fledgeling(x) -> Argentous(x)) -> therefore Argentous(idette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Carli is not appressed. Jacynth is sugary. Halvard is appressed. Pollyanna is not marvellous. If Halvard is caducous then Halvard is quotidian. All appressed people are marvellous. All nonviable people are sugary. White people are sugary. All marvellous people are nonviable. If someone is unable and quotidian then they are caducous. Halvard is sugary.", "logic": "\nnot Appressed(carli)\nSugary(jacynth)\nAppressed(halvard)\nnot Marvellous(pollyanna)\nCaducous(halvard) -> Quotidian(halvard)\nforall x (Appressed(x) -> Marvellous(x))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) -> Sugary(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> Sugary(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Nonviable(x))\nforall x (Unable(x) and Quotidian(x) -> Caducous(x))\n\nSugary(halvard)\n\nAppressed(halvard) and forall x (Appressed(x) -> Marvellous(x)) -> therefore Marvellous(halvard) Marvellous(halvard) and forall x (Marvellous(x) -> Nonviable(x)) -> therefore Nonviable(halvard) Nonviable(halvard) and forall x (Nonviable(x) -> Sugary(x)) -> therefore Sugary(halvard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Viola is not annoyed. Rodd is boffo. Andriette is annoyed. Werner is not mechanised. If Andriette is chechen then Andriette is sublimed. All annoyed people are mechanised. All seamless people are boffo. White people are boffo. All mechanised people are seamless. If someone is obliterate and sublimed then they are chechen. Andriette is not boffo.", "logic": "\nnot Annoyed(viola)\nBoffo(rodd)\nAnnoyed(andriette)\nnot Mechanised(werner)\nChechen(andriette) -> Sublimed(andriette)\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Mechanised(x))\nforall x (Seamless(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Sublimed(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Mechanised(x) -> Seamless(x))\nforall x (Obliterate(x) and Sublimed(x) -> Chechen(x))\n\nnot Boffo(andriette)\n\nAnnoyed(andriette) and forall x (Annoyed(x) -> Mechanised(x)) -> therefore Mechanised(andriette) Mechanised(andriette) and forall x (Mechanised(x) -> Seamless(x)) -> therefore Seamless(andriette) Seamless(andriette) and forall x (Seamless(x) -> Boffo(x)) -> therefore Boffo(andriette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Lori is not gone. Ofelia is near. Shannan is gone. Mayer is not blighted. If Shannan is barred then Shannan is foursquare. All gone people are blighted. All unrelieved people are near. White people are near. All blighted people are unrelieved. If someone is unchaste and foursquare then they are barred. Lori is not unrelieved.", "logic": "\nnot Gone(lori)\nNear(ofelia)\nGone(shannan)\nnot Blighted(mayer)\nBarred(shannan) -> Foursquare(shannan)\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Blighted(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Near(x))\nforall x (Foursquare(x) -> Near(x))\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Foursquare(x) -> Barred(x))\n\nnot Unrelieved(lori)\n\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Unrelieved(x)) <- forall x (Gone(x) -> Blighted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Teresita is not cynical. Wanda is menstrual. Andie is cynical. Elysia is not commodious. If Andie is conceptual then Andie is taiwanese. All cynical people are commodious. All saintlike people are menstrual. White people are menstrual. All commodious people are saintlike. If someone is agonising and taiwanese then they are conceptual. Elysia is menstrual.", "logic": "\nnot Cynical(teresita)\nMenstrual(wanda)\nCynical(andie)\nnot Commodious(elysia)\nConceptual(andie) -> Taiwanese(andie)\nforall x (Cynical(x) -> Commodious(x))\nforall x (Saintlike(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nforall x (Taiwanese(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nforall x (Commodious(x) -> Saintlike(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) and Taiwanese(x) -> Conceptual(x))\n\nMenstrual(elysia)\n\nforall x (Saintlike(x) -> Menstrual(x)) <- forall x (Commodious(x) -> Saintlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Brit is not conveyable. Amaleta is caucasic. West is conveyable. Hettie is not invasive. If West is cryptical then West is thievish. All conveyable people are invasive. All tranquil people are caucasic. White people are caucasic. All invasive people are tranquil. If someone is bailable and thievish then they are cryptical. West is not thievish.", "logic": "\nnot Conveyable(brit)\nCaucasic(amaleta)\nConveyable(west)\nnot Invasive(hettie)\nCryptical(west) -> Thievish(west)\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Invasive(x))\nforall x (Tranquil(x) -> Caucasic(x))\nforall x (Thievish(x) -> Caucasic(x))\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Tranquil(x))\nforall x (Bailable(x) and Thievish(x) -> Cryptical(x))\n\nnot Thievish(west)\n\nCryptical(west) -> Thievish(west) <- forall x (Bailable(x) and Thievish(x) -> Cryptical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Costa is not unremarked. Sheela is depressing. Dewey is unremarked. Rosalind is not teeming. If Dewey is marred then Dewey is renascent. All unremarked people are teeming. All prefrontal people are depressing. White people are depressing. All teeming people are prefrontal. If someone is soulless and renascent then they are marred. Dewey is marred.", "logic": "\nnot Unremarked(costa)\nDepressing(sheela)\nUnremarked(dewey)\nnot Teeming(rosalind)\nMarred(dewey) -> Renascent(dewey)\nforall x (Unremarked(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) -> Depressing(x))\nforall x (Renascent(x) -> Depressing(x))\nforall x (Teeming(x) -> Prefrontal(x))\nforall x (Soulless(x) and Renascent(x) -> Marred(x))\n\nMarred(dewey)\n\nforall x (Soulless(x) and Renascent(x) -> Marred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Albertine is not tongueless. Clara is romantic. Griselda is tongueless. Tedman is not deflective. If Griselda is unsought then Griselda is twinning. All tongueless people are deflective. All striking people are romantic. White people are romantic. All deflective people are striking. If someone is lettered and twinning then they are unsought. Albertine is not twinning.", "logic": "\nnot Tongueless(albertine)\nRomantic(clara)\nTongueless(griselda)\nnot Deflective(tedman)\nUnsought(griselda) -> Twinning(griselda)\nforall x (Tongueless(x) -> Deflective(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) -> Romantic(x))\nforall x (Twinning(x) -> Romantic(x))\nforall x (Deflective(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Twinning(x) -> Unsought(x))\n\nnot Twinning(albertine)\n\nnot Twinning(albertine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Andre is not unified. Colleen is memorable. Trip is unified. Vitoria is not retrograde. If Trip is stuporous then Trip is salving. All unified people are retrograde. All unfit people are memorable. White people are memorable. All retrograde people are unfit. If someone is autogenic and salving then they are stuporous. Colleen is autogenic.", "logic": "\nnot Unified(andre)\nMemorable(colleen)\nUnified(trip)\nnot Retrograde(vitoria)\nStuporous(trip) -> Salving(trip)\nforall x (Unified(x) -> Retrograde(x))\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) -> Unfit(x))\nforall x (Autogenic(x) and Salving(x) -> Stuporous(x))\n\nAutogenic(colleen)\n\nAutogenic(colleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Elijah is not reliable. Agathe is procumbent. Eyde is reliable. Zena is not undigested. If Eyde is unsteady then Eyde is unnoticed. All reliable people are undigested. All perversive people are procumbent. White people are procumbent. All undigested people are perversive. If someone is backstairs and unnoticed then they are unsteady. Zena is not reliable.", "logic": "\nnot Reliable(elijah)\nProcumbent(agathe)\nReliable(eyde)\nnot Undigested(zena)\nUnsteady(eyde) -> Unnoticed(eyde)\nforall x (Reliable(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Procumbent(x))\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) -> Procumbent(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> Perversive(x))\nforall x (Backstairs(x) and Unnoticed(x) -> Unsteady(x))\n\nnot Reliable(zena)\n\nnot Reliable(zena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Antonetta is not tenth. Judas is ephemeral. Derrin is tenth. Sybila is not deweyan. If Derrin is rattling then Derrin is welcoming. All tenth people are deweyan. All tannish people are ephemeral. White people are ephemeral. All deweyan people are tannish. If someone is patterned and welcoming then they are rattling. Antonetta is patterned.", "logic": "\nnot Tenth(antonetta)\nEphemeral(judas)\nTenth(derrin)\nnot Deweyan(sybila)\nRattling(derrin) -> Welcoming(derrin)\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Tannish(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Tannish(x))\nforall x (Patterned(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Rattling(x))\n\nPatterned(antonetta)\n\nPatterned(antonetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-748"} {"premises": "Fifine is reachable. Fifine is palmlike. Fifine is flat. Fifine is untilled. Corky is acanthoid. Corky is flat. Corky is untilled. Corky is reasoning. Laurette is reachable. Laurette is acanthoid. Laurette is flat. Laurette is reasoning. Kind, flat people are acanthoid. All untilled, flat people are acanthoid. If someone is reachable and untilled then they are unlisted. If Fifine is palmlike and Fifine is untilled then Fifine is reasoning. If someone is acanthoid and palmlike then they are reachable. All untilled, reasoning people are flat. If someone is reasoning and unlisted then they are acanthoid. If someone is reasoning then they are palmlike. Fifine is untilled.", "logic": "\nReachable(fifine)\nPalmlike(fifine)\nFlat(fifine)\nUntilled(fifine)\nAcanthoid(corky)\nFlat(corky)\nUntilled(corky)\nReasoning(corky)\nReachable(laurette)\nAcanthoid(laurette)\nFlat(laurette)\nReasoning(laurette)\nforall x (Unlisted(x) and Flat(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Untilled(x) and Flat(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) and Untilled(x) -> Unlisted(x))\nPalmlike(fifine) and Untilled(fifine) -> Reasoning(fifine)\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) and Palmlike(x) -> Reachable(x))\nforall x (Untilled(x) and Reasoning(x) -> Flat(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) and Unlisted(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) -> Palmlike(x))\n\nUntilled(fifine)\n\ntherefore Untilled(fifine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "French is womanlike. French is verdant. French is pixilated. French is venezuelan. Sibley is cumuliform. Sibley is pixilated. Sibley is venezuelan. Sibley is medullated. Kaspar is womanlike. Kaspar is cumuliform. Kaspar is pixilated. Kaspar is medullated. Kind, pixilated people are cumuliform. All venezuelan, pixilated people are cumuliform. If someone is womanlike and venezuelan then they are homesick. If French is verdant and French is venezuelan then French is medullated. If someone is cumuliform and verdant then they are womanlike. All venezuelan, medullated people are pixilated. If someone is medullated and homesick then they are cumuliform. If someone is medullated then they are verdant. Sibley is not cumuliform.", "logic": "\nWomanlike(french)\nVerdant(french)\nPixilated(french)\nVenezuelan(french)\nCumuliform(sibley)\nPixilated(sibley)\nVenezuelan(sibley)\nMedullated(sibley)\nWomanlike(kaspar)\nCumuliform(kaspar)\nPixilated(kaspar)\nMedullated(kaspar)\nforall x (Homesick(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Cumuliform(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Cumuliform(x))\nforall x (Womanlike(x) and Venezuelan(x) -> Homesick(x))\nVerdant(french) and Venezuelan(french) -> Medullated(french)\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) and Verdant(x) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and Medullated(x) -> Pixilated(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) and Homesick(x) -> Cumuliform(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) -> Verdant(x))\n\nnot Cumuliform(sibley)\n\ntherefore Cumuliform(sibley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Beth is proofed. Beth is insipid. Beth is distaff. Beth is weedless. Sibilla is disjointed. Sibilla is distaff. Sibilla is weedless. Sibilla is verbose. Murphy is proofed. Murphy is disjointed. Murphy is distaff. Murphy is verbose. Kind, distaff people are disjointed. All weedless, distaff people are disjointed. If someone is proofed and weedless then they are nett. If Beth is insipid and Beth is weedless then Beth is verbose. If someone is disjointed and insipid then they are proofed. All weedless, verbose people are distaff. If someone is verbose and nett then they are disjointed. If someone is verbose then they are insipid. Beth is verbose.", "logic": "\nProofed(beth)\nInsipid(beth)\nDistaff(beth)\nWeedless(beth)\nDisjointed(sibilla)\nDistaff(sibilla)\nWeedless(sibilla)\nVerbose(sibilla)\nProofed(murphy)\nDisjointed(murphy)\nDistaff(murphy)\nVerbose(murphy)\nforall x (Nett(x) and Distaff(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Weedless(x) and Distaff(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) and Weedless(x) -> Nett(x))\nInsipid(beth) and Weedless(beth) -> Verbose(beth)\nforall x (Disjointed(x) and Insipid(x) -> Proofed(x))\nforall x (Weedless(x) and Verbose(x) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Verbose(x) and Nett(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Verbose(x) -> Insipid(x))\n\nVerbose(beth)\n\nInsipid(beth) and Weedless(beth) and Insipid(beth) and Weedless(beth) -> Verbose(beth) -> therefore Verbose(beth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Loella is gentile. Loella is tested. Loella is bowed. Loella is untwisted. Blondy is appointive. Blondy is bowed. Blondy is untwisted. Blondy is bribable. Torrey is gentile. Torrey is appointive. Torrey is bowed. Torrey is bribable. Kind, bowed people are appointive. All untwisted, bowed people are appointive. If someone is gentile and untwisted then they are intragroup. If Loella is tested and Loella is untwisted then Loella is bribable. If someone is appointive and tested then they are gentile. All untwisted, bribable people are bowed. If someone is bribable and intragroup then they are appointive. If someone is bribable then they are tested. Torrey is not tested.", "logic": "\nGentile(loella)\nTested(loella)\nBowed(loella)\nUntwisted(loella)\nAppointive(blondy)\nBowed(blondy)\nUntwisted(blondy)\nBribable(blondy)\nGentile(torrey)\nAppointive(torrey)\nBowed(torrey)\nBribable(torrey)\nforall x (Intragroup(x) and Bowed(x) -> Appointive(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) and Bowed(x) -> Appointive(x))\nforall x (Gentile(x) and Untwisted(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nTested(loella) and Untwisted(loella) -> Bribable(loella)\nforall x (Appointive(x) and Tested(x) -> Gentile(x))\nforall x (Untwisted(x) and Bribable(x) -> Bowed(x))\nforall x (Bribable(x) and Intragroup(x) -> Appointive(x))\nforall x (Bribable(x) -> Tested(x))\n\nnot Tested(torrey)\n\nBribable(torrey) and forall x (Bribable(x) -> Tested(x)) -> therefore Tested(torrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Quigly is dismal. Quigly is double. Quigly is draughty. Quigly is staid. Marlane is unrimed. Marlane is draughty. Marlane is staid. Marlane is sandy. Vaclav is dismal. Vaclav is unrimed. Vaclav is draughty. Vaclav is sandy. Kind, draughty people are unrimed. All staid, draughty people are unrimed. If someone is dismal and staid then they are paperback. If Quigly is double and Quigly is staid then Quigly is sandy. If someone is unrimed and double then they are dismal. All staid, sandy people are draughty. If someone is sandy and paperback then they are unrimed. If someone is sandy then they are double. Marlane is dismal.", "logic": "\nDismal(quigly)\nDouble(quigly)\nDraughty(quigly)\nStaid(quigly)\nUnrimed(marlane)\nDraughty(marlane)\nStaid(marlane)\nSandy(marlane)\nDismal(vaclav)\nUnrimed(vaclav)\nDraughty(vaclav)\nSandy(vaclav)\nforall x (Paperback(x) and Draughty(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) and Draughty(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nforall x (Dismal(x) and Staid(x) -> Paperback(x))\nDouble(quigly) and Staid(quigly) -> Sandy(quigly)\nforall x (Unrimed(x) and Double(x) -> Dismal(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) and Sandy(x) -> Draughty(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) and Paperback(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) -> Double(x))\n\nDismal(marlane)\n\nSandy(marlane) and forall x (Sandy(x) -> Double(x)) -> therefore Double(marlane) Unrimed(marlane) and Double(marlane) and forall x (Unrimed(x) and Double(x) -> Dismal(x)) -> therefore Dismal(marlane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Dona is paperlike. Dona is cotyloid. Dona is bromidic. Dona is glowering. Hayley is proximal. Hayley is bromidic. Hayley is glowering. Hayley is fouled. Andree is paperlike. Andree is proximal. Andree is bromidic. Andree is fouled. Kind, bromidic people are proximal. All glowering, bromidic people are proximal. If someone is paperlike and glowering then they are arithmetic. If Dona is cotyloid and Dona is glowering then Dona is fouled. If someone is proximal and cotyloid then they are paperlike. All glowering, fouled people are bromidic. If someone is fouled and arithmetic then they are proximal. If someone is fouled then they are cotyloid. Hayley is not paperlike.", "logic": "\nPaperlike(dona)\nCotyloid(dona)\nBromidic(dona)\nGlowering(dona)\nProximal(hayley)\nBromidic(hayley)\nGlowering(hayley)\nFouled(hayley)\nPaperlike(andree)\nProximal(andree)\nBromidic(andree)\nFouled(andree)\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) and Bromidic(x) -> Proximal(x))\nforall x (Glowering(x) and Bromidic(x) -> Proximal(x))\nforall x (Paperlike(x) and Glowering(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nCotyloid(dona) and Glowering(dona) -> Fouled(dona)\nforall x (Proximal(x) and Cotyloid(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Glowering(x) and Fouled(x) -> Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) and Arithmetic(x) -> Proximal(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) -> Cotyloid(x))\n\nnot Paperlike(hayley)\n\nFouled(hayley) and forall x (Fouled(x) -> Cotyloid(x)) -> therefore Cotyloid(hayley) Proximal(hayley) and Cotyloid(hayley) and forall x (Proximal(x) and Cotyloid(x) -> Paperlike(x)) -> therefore Paperlike(hayley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Crissie is handled. Crissie is spayed. Crissie is xxxi. Crissie is unstrung. Nerte is unimproved. Nerte is xxxi. Nerte is unstrung. Nerte is aguish. Tresa is handled. Tresa is unimproved. Tresa is xxxi. Tresa is aguish. Kind, xxxi people are unimproved. All unstrung, xxxi people are unimproved. If someone is handled and unstrung then they are monastic. If Crissie is spayed and Crissie is unstrung then Crissie is aguish. If someone is unimproved and spayed then they are handled. All unstrung, aguish people are xxxi. If someone is aguish and monastic then they are unimproved. If someone is aguish then they are spayed. Nerte is monastic.", "logic": "\nHandled(crissie)\nSpayed(crissie)\nXxxi(crissie)\nUnstrung(crissie)\nUnimproved(nerte)\nXxxi(nerte)\nUnstrung(nerte)\nAguish(nerte)\nHandled(tresa)\nUnimproved(tresa)\nXxxi(tresa)\nAguish(tresa)\nforall x (Monastic(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Unstrung(x) and Xxxi(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Handled(x) and Unstrung(x) -> Monastic(x))\nSpayed(crissie) and Unstrung(crissie) -> Aguish(crissie)\nforall x (Unimproved(x) and Spayed(x) -> Handled(x))\nforall x (Unstrung(x) and Aguish(x) -> Xxxi(x))\nforall x (Aguish(x) and Monastic(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nforall x (Aguish(x) -> Spayed(x))\n\nMonastic(nerte)\n\nAguish(nerte) and forall x (Aguish(x) -> Spayed(x)) -> therefore Spayed(nerte) Unimproved(nerte) and Spayed(nerte) and forall x (Unimproved(x) and Spayed(x) -> Handled(x)) -> therefore Handled(nerte) Handled(nerte) and Unstrung(nerte) and forall x (Handled(x) and Unstrung(x) -> Monastic(x)) -> therefore Monastic(nerte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Timmi is andorran. Timmi is handleless. Timmi is dyslectic. Timmi is chromatic. Gunvor is immodest. Gunvor is dyslectic. Gunvor is chromatic. Gunvor is swiss. Mercedes is andorran. Mercedes is immodest. Mercedes is dyslectic. Mercedes is swiss. Kind, dyslectic people are immodest. All chromatic, dyslectic people are immodest. If someone is andorran and chromatic then they are treelike. If Timmi is handleless and Timmi is chromatic then Timmi is swiss. If someone is immodest and handleless then they are andorran. All chromatic, swiss people are dyslectic. If someone is swiss and treelike then they are immodest. If someone is swiss then they are handleless. Gunvor is not treelike.", "logic": "\nAndorran(timmi)\nHandleless(timmi)\nDyslectic(timmi)\nChromatic(timmi)\nImmodest(gunvor)\nDyslectic(gunvor)\nChromatic(gunvor)\nSwiss(gunvor)\nAndorran(mercedes)\nImmodest(mercedes)\nDyslectic(mercedes)\nSwiss(mercedes)\nforall x (Treelike(x) and Dyslectic(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) and Dyslectic(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Andorran(x) and Chromatic(x) -> Treelike(x))\nHandleless(timmi) and Chromatic(timmi) -> Swiss(timmi)\nforall x (Immodest(x) and Handleless(x) -> Andorran(x))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) and Swiss(x) -> Dyslectic(x))\nforall x (Swiss(x) and Treelike(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Swiss(x) -> Handleless(x))\n\nnot Treelike(gunvor)\n\nSwiss(gunvor) and forall x (Swiss(x) -> Handleless(x)) -> therefore Handleless(gunvor) Immodest(gunvor) and Handleless(gunvor) and forall x (Immodest(x) and Handleless(x) -> Andorran(x)) -> therefore Andorran(gunvor) Andorran(gunvor) and Chromatic(gunvor) and forall x (Andorran(x) and Chromatic(x) -> Treelike(x)) -> therefore Treelike(gunvor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Sharron is bitterish. Sharron is shaky. Sharron is stringy. Sharron is notable. Antonius is tireless. Antonius is stringy. Antonius is notable. Antonius is drafty. Violette is bitterish. Violette is tireless. Violette is stringy. Violette is drafty. Kind, stringy people are tireless. All notable, stringy people are tireless. If someone is bitterish and notable then they are cavitied. If Sharron is shaky and Sharron is notable then Sharron is drafty. If someone is tireless and shaky then they are bitterish. All notable, drafty people are stringy. If someone is drafty and cavitied then they are tireless. If someone is drafty then they are shaky. Violette is not cavitied.", "logic": "\nBitterish(sharron)\nShaky(sharron)\nStringy(sharron)\nNotable(sharron)\nTireless(antonius)\nStringy(antonius)\nNotable(antonius)\nDrafty(antonius)\nBitterish(violette)\nTireless(violette)\nStringy(violette)\nDrafty(violette)\nforall x (Cavitied(x) and Stringy(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Notable(x) and Stringy(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and Notable(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nShaky(sharron) and Notable(sharron) -> Drafty(sharron)\nforall x (Tireless(x) and Shaky(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Notable(x) and Drafty(x) -> Stringy(x))\nforall x (Drafty(x) and Cavitied(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Drafty(x) -> Shaky(x))\n\nnot Cavitied(violette)\n\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and Notable(x) -> Cavitied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "Garth is ancestral. Garth is dendroidal. Garth is cloven. Garth is rheologic. Issy is hydrous. Issy is cloven. Issy is rheologic. Issy is altricial. Devina is ancestral. Devina is hydrous. Devina is cloven. Devina is altricial. Kind, cloven people are hydrous. All rheologic, cloven people are hydrous. If someone is ancestral and rheologic then they are scratchy. If Garth is dendroidal and Garth is rheologic then Garth is altricial. If someone is hydrous and dendroidal then they are ancestral. All rheologic, altricial people are cloven. If someone is altricial and scratchy then they are hydrous. If someone is altricial then they are dendroidal. Devina is rheologic.", "logic": "\nAncestral(garth)\nDendroidal(garth)\nCloven(garth)\nRheologic(garth)\nHydrous(issy)\nCloven(issy)\nRheologic(issy)\nAltricial(issy)\nAncestral(devina)\nHydrous(devina)\nCloven(devina)\nAltricial(devina)\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Cloven(x) -> Hydrous(x))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Cloven(x) -> Hydrous(x))\nforall x (Ancestral(x) and Rheologic(x) -> Scratchy(x))\nDendroidal(garth) and Rheologic(garth) -> Altricial(garth)\nforall x (Hydrous(x) and Dendroidal(x) -> Ancestral(x))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Altricial(x) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Altricial(x) and Scratchy(x) -> Hydrous(x))\nforall x (Altricial(x) -> Dendroidal(x))\n\nRheologic(devina)\n\nRheologic(devina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1444"} {"premises": "The gifford transect the mona. The mona starboard the gifford. If the gifford slog the mona then the mona is gummed. If something transect the gifford then the gifford slog the mona. If something transect the mona then it transect the gifford. If something slog the mona then the mona is not pyrogallic. If something transect the mona and the mona slog the gifford then the mona starboard the gifford. If something is widowed and it transect the mona then it does not eat the mona. All insouciant things are not widowed. If the gifford slog the mona and the mona does not eat the gifford then the gifford is insouciant. The mona starboard the gifford.", "logic": "\nTransect(gifford, mona)\nStarboard(mona, gifford)\nSlog(gifford, mona) -> Gummed(mona)\nforall x (Transect(x, gifford) -> Slog(gifford, mona))\nforall x (Transect(x, mona) -> Transect(x, gifford))\nforall x (Slog(x, mona) -> not Pyrogallic(mona))\nforall x (Transect(x, mona) and Slog(mona, gifford) -> Starboard(mona, gifford))\nforall x (Widowed(x) and Transect(x, mona) -> not Starboard(x, mona))\nforall x (Insouciant(x) -> not Widowed(x))\nSlog(gifford, mona) and not Starboard(mona, gifford) -> Insouciant(gifford)\n\nStarboard(mona, gifford)\n\ntherefore Starboard(mona, gifford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The raleigh unfold the arvin. The arvin assail the raleigh. If the raleigh silver the arvin then the arvin is unfaceted. If something unfold the raleigh then the raleigh silver the arvin. If something unfold the arvin then it unfold the raleigh. If something silver the arvin then the arvin is not henpecked. If something unfold the arvin and the arvin silver the raleigh then the arvin assail the raleigh. If something is astringent and it unfold the arvin then it does not eat the arvin. All thankful things are not astringent. If the raleigh silver the arvin and the arvin does not eat the raleigh then the raleigh is thankful. The arvin does not eat the raleigh.", "logic": "\nUnfold(raleigh, arvin)\nAssail(arvin, raleigh)\nSilver(raleigh, arvin) -> Unfaceted(arvin)\nforall x (Unfold(x, raleigh) -> Silver(raleigh, arvin))\nforall x (Unfold(x, arvin) -> Unfold(x, raleigh))\nforall x (Silver(x, arvin) -> not Henpecked(arvin))\nforall x (Unfold(x, arvin) and Silver(arvin, raleigh) -> Assail(arvin, raleigh))\nforall x (Astringent(x) and Unfold(x, arvin) -> not Assail(x, arvin))\nforall x (Thankful(x) -> not Astringent(x))\nSilver(raleigh, arvin) and not Assail(arvin, raleigh) -> Thankful(raleigh)\n\nnot Assail(arvin, raleigh)\n\ntherefore Assail(arvin, raleigh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The francoise hound the jonie. The jonie swing the francoise. If the francoise idolize the jonie then the jonie is superior. If something hound the francoise then the francoise idolize the jonie. If something hound the jonie then it hound the francoise. If something idolize the jonie then the jonie is not prismatic. If something hound the jonie and the jonie idolize the francoise then the jonie swing the francoise. If something is campy and it hound the jonie then it does not eat the jonie. All uninviting things are not campy. If the francoise idolize the jonie and the jonie does not eat the francoise then the francoise is uninviting. The francoise hound the francoise.", "logic": "\nHound(francoise, jonie)\nSwing(jonie, francoise)\nIdolize(francoise, jonie) -> Superior(jonie)\nforall x (Hound(x, francoise) -> Idolize(francoise, jonie))\nforall x (Hound(x, jonie) -> Hound(x, francoise))\nforall x (Idolize(x, jonie) -> not Prismatic(jonie))\nforall x (Hound(x, jonie) and Idolize(jonie, francoise) -> Swing(jonie, francoise))\nforall x (Campy(x) and Hound(x, jonie) -> not Swing(x, jonie))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> not Campy(x))\nIdolize(francoise, jonie) and not Swing(jonie, francoise) -> Uninviting(francoise)\n\nHound(francoise, francoise)\n\nHound(francoise, jonie) and forall x (Hound(x, jonie) -> Hound(x, francoise)) -> therefore Hound(francoise, francoise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The alden discount the gates. The gates furcate the alden. If the alden quieten the gates then the gates is subsequent. If something discount the alden then the alden quieten the gates. If something discount the gates then it discount the alden. If something quieten the gates then the gates is not blockish. If something discount the gates and the gates quieten the alden then the gates furcate the alden. If something is pectoral and it discount the gates then it does not eat the gates. All skanky things are not pectoral. If the alden quieten the gates and the gates does not eat the alden then the alden is skanky. The alden does not visit the alden.", "logic": "\nDiscount(alden, gates)\nFurcate(gates, alden)\nQuieten(alden, gates) -> Subsequent(gates)\nforall x (Discount(x, alden) -> Quieten(alden, gates))\nforall x (Discount(x, gates) -> Discount(x, alden))\nforall x (Quieten(x, gates) -> not Blockish(gates))\nforall x (Discount(x, gates) and Quieten(gates, alden) -> Furcate(gates, alden))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) and Discount(x, gates) -> not Furcate(x, gates))\nforall x (Skanky(x) -> not Pectoral(x))\nQuieten(alden, gates) and not Furcate(gates, alden) -> Skanky(alden)\n\nnot Discount(alden, alden)\n\nDiscount(alden, gates) and forall x (Discount(x, gates) -> Discount(x, alden)) -> therefore Discount(alden, alden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The tarrant archive the davidde. The davidde unwrap the tarrant. If the tarrant brew the davidde then the davidde is focussed. If something archive the tarrant then the tarrant brew the davidde. If something archive the davidde then it archive the tarrant. If something brew the davidde then the davidde is not displeased. If something archive the davidde and the davidde brew the tarrant then the davidde unwrap the tarrant. If something is spotted and it archive the davidde then it does not eat the davidde. All cognisant things are not spotted. If the tarrant brew the davidde and the davidde does not eat the tarrant then the tarrant is cognisant. The tarrant brew the davidde.", "logic": "\nArchive(tarrant, davidde)\nUnwrap(davidde, tarrant)\nBrew(tarrant, davidde) -> Focussed(davidde)\nforall x (Archive(x, tarrant) -> Brew(tarrant, davidde))\nforall x (Archive(x, davidde) -> Archive(x, tarrant))\nforall x (Brew(x, davidde) -> not Displeased(davidde))\nforall x (Archive(x, davidde) and Brew(davidde, tarrant) -> Unwrap(davidde, tarrant))\nforall x (Spotted(x) and Archive(x, davidde) -> not Unwrap(x, davidde))\nforall x (Cognisant(x) -> not Spotted(x))\nBrew(tarrant, davidde) and not Unwrap(davidde, tarrant) -> Cognisant(tarrant)\n\nBrew(tarrant, davidde)\n\nArchive(tarrant, davidde) and forall x (Archive(x, davidde) -> Archive(x, tarrant)) -> therefore Archive(tarrant, tarrant) Archive(tarrant, tarrant) and forall x (Archive(x, tarrant) -> Brew(tarrant, davidde)) -> therefore Brew(tarrant, davidde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The iain imagine the cammi. The cammi clunk the iain. If the iain serialise the cammi then the cammi is viennese. If something imagine the iain then the iain serialise the cammi. If something imagine the cammi then it imagine the iain. If something serialise the cammi then the cammi is not toxic. If something imagine the cammi and the cammi serialise the iain then the cammi clunk the iain. If something is burbly and it imagine the cammi then it does not eat the cammi. All stringent things are not burbly. If the iain serialise the cammi and the cammi does not eat the iain then the iain is stringent. The iain does not see the cammi.", "logic": "\nImagine(iain, cammi)\nClunk(cammi, iain)\nSerialise(iain, cammi) -> Viennese(cammi)\nforall x (Imagine(x, iain) -> Serialise(iain, cammi))\nforall x (Imagine(x, cammi) -> Imagine(x, iain))\nforall x (Serialise(x, cammi) -> not Toxic(cammi))\nforall x (Imagine(x, cammi) and Serialise(cammi, iain) -> Clunk(cammi, iain))\nforall x (Burbly(x) and Imagine(x, cammi) -> not Clunk(x, cammi))\nforall x (Stringent(x) -> not Burbly(x))\nSerialise(iain, cammi) and not Clunk(cammi, iain) -> Stringent(iain)\n\nnot Serialise(iain, cammi)\n\nImagine(iain, cammi) and forall x (Imagine(x, cammi) -> Imagine(x, iain)) -> therefore Imagine(iain, iain) Imagine(iain, iain) and forall x (Imagine(x, iain) -> Serialise(iain, cammi)) -> therefore Serialise(iain, cammi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The charity roughhouse the darb. The darb boast the charity. If the charity chaperon the darb then the darb is unfit. If something roughhouse the charity then the charity chaperon the darb. If something roughhouse the darb then it roughhouse the charity. If something chaperon the darb then the darb is not unmelted. If something roughhouse the darb and the darb chaperon the charity then the darb boast the charity. If something is freelance and it roughhouse the darb then it does not eat the darb. All spacious things are not freelance. If the charity chaperon the darb and the darb does not eat the charity then the charity is spacious. The darb is not unmelted.", "logic": "\nRoughhouse(charity, darb)\nBoast(darb, charity)\nChaperon(charity, darb) -> Unfit(darb)\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, charity) -> Chaperon(charity, darb))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, darb) -> Roughhouse(x, charity))\nforall x (Chaperon(x, darb) -> not Unmelted(darb))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, darb) and Chaperon(darb, charity) -> Boast(darb, charity))\nforall x (Freelance(x) and Roughhouse(x, darb) -> not Boast(x, darb))\nforall x (Spacious(x) -> not Freelance(x))\nChaperon(charity, darb) and not Boast(darb, charity) -> Spacious(charity)\n\nnot Unmelted(darb)\n\nRoughhouse(charity, darb) and forall x (Roughhouse(x, darb) -> Roughhouse(x, charity)) -> therefore Roughhouse(charity, charity) Roughhouse(charity, charity) and forall x (Roughhouse(x, charity) -> Chaperon(charity, darb)) -> therefore Chaperon(charity, darb) Chaperon(charity, darb) and forall x (Chaperon(x, darb) -> not Unmelted(darb)) -> therefore not Unmelted(darb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The pandora secede the cal. The cal prowl the pandora. If the pandora manure the cal then the cal is dipolar. If something secede the pandora then the pandora manure the cal. If something secede the cal then it secede the pandora. If something manure the cal then the cal is not newsworthy. If something secede the cal and the cal manure the pandora then the cal prowl the pandora. If something is mucosal and it secede the cal then it does not eat the cal. All atrocious things are not mucosal. If the pandora manure the cal and the cal does not eat the pandora then the pandora is atrocious. The cal is newsworthy.", "logic": "\nSecede(pandora, cal)\nProwl(cal, pandora)\nManure(pandora, cal) -> Dipolar(cal)\nforall x (Secede(x, pandora) -> Manure(pandora, cal))\nforall x (Secede(x, cal) -> Secede(x, pandora))\nforall x (Manure(x, cal) -> not Newsworthy(cal))\nforall x (Secede(x, cal) and Manure(cal, pandora) -> Prowl(cal, pandora))\nforall x (Mucosal(x) and Secede(x, cal) -> not Prowl(x, cal))\nforall x (Atrocious(x) -> not Mucosal(x))\nManure(pandora, cal) and not Prowl(cal, pandora) -> Atrocious(pandora)\n\nNewsworthy(cal)\n\nSecede(pandora, cal) and forall x (Secede(x, cal) -> Secede(x, pandora)) -> therefore Secede(pandora, pandora) Secede(pandora, pandora) and forall x (Secede(x, pandora) -> Manure(pandora, cal)) -> therefore Manure(pandora, cal) Manure(pandora, cal) and forall x (Manure(x, cal) -> not Newsworthy(cal)) -> therefore not Newsworthy(cal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The magdalen crosscut the hayes. The hayes emote the magdalen. If the magdalen perform the hayes then the hayes is statutory. If something crosscut the magdalen then the magdalen perform the hayes. If something crosscut the hayes then it crosscut the magdalen. If something perform the hayes then the hayes is not improving. If something crosscut the hayes and the hayes perform the magdalen then the hayes emote the magdalen. If something is deformed and it crosscut the hayes then it does not eat the hayes. All splotched things are not deformed. If the magdalen perform the hayes and the hayes does not eat the magdalen then the magdalen is splotched. The magdalen is not splotched.", "logic": "\nCrosscut(magdalen, hayes)\nEmote(hayes, magdalen)\nPerform(magdalen, hayes) -> Statutory(hayes)\nforall x (Crosscut(x, magdalen) -> Perform(magdalen, hayes))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, hayes) -> Crosscut(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Perform(x, hayes) -> not Improving(hayes))\nforall x (Crosscut(x, hayes) and Perform(hayes, magdalen) -> Emote(hayes, magdalen))\nforall x (Deformed(x) and Crosscut(x, hayes) -> not Emote(x, hayes))\nforall x (Splotched(x) -> not Deformed(x))\nPerform(magdalen, hayes) and not Emote(hayes, magdalen) -> Splotched(magdalen)\n\nnot Splotched(magdalen)\n\nPerform(magdalen, hayes) and not Emote(hayes, magdalen) -> Splotched(magdalen) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The iormina tame the natka. The natka politicize the iormina. If the iormina pounce the natka then the natka is owing. If something tame the iormina then the iormina pounce the natka. If something tame the natka then it tame the iormina. If something pounce the natka then the natka is not galling. If something tame the natka and the natka pounce the iormina then the natka politicize the iormina. If something is sedate and it tame the natka then it does not eat the natka. All cubital things are not sedate. If the iormina pounce the natka and the natka does not eat the iormina then the iormina is cubital. The natka tame the iormina.", "logic": "\nTame(iormina, natka)\nPoliticize(natka, iormina)\nPounce(iormina, natka) -> Owing(natka)\nforall x (Tame(x, iormina) -> Pounce(iormina, natka))\nforall x (Tame(x, natka) -> Tame(x, iormina))\nforall x (Pounce(x, natka) -> not Galling(natka))\nforall x (Tame(x, natka) and Pounce(natka, iormina) -> Politicize(natka, iormina))\nforall x (Sedate(x) and Tame(x, natka) -> not Politicize(x, natka))\nforall x (Cubital(x) -> not Sedate(x))\nPounce(iormina, natka) and not Politicize(natka, iormina) -> Cubital(iormina)\n\nTame(natka, iormina)\n\nforall x (Tame(x, natka) -> Tame(x, iormina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The cacilia preclude the merlina. The merlina sensitize the cacilia. If the cacilia rummage the merlina then the merlina is saxicoline. If something preclude the cacilia then the cacilia rummage the merlina. If something preclude the merlina then it preclude the cacilia. If something rummage the merlina then the merlina is not crass. If something preclude the merlina and the merlina rummage the cacilia then the merlina sensitize the cacilia. If something is equitable and it preclude the merlina then it does not eat the merlina. All germfree things are not equitable. If the cacilia rummage the merlina and the merlina does not eat the cacilia then the cacilia is germfree. The merlina is not germfree.", "logic": "\nPreclude(cacilia, merlina)\nSensitize(merlina, cacilia)\nRummage(cacilia, merlina) -> Saxicoline(merlina)\nforall x (Preclude(x, cacilia) -> Rummage(cacilia, merlina))\nforall x (Preclude(x, merlina) -> Preclude(x, cacilia))\nforall x (Rummage(x, merlina) -> not Crass(merlina))\nforall x (Preclude(x, merlina) and Rummage(merlina, cacilia) -> Sensitize(merlina, cacilia))\nforall x (Equitable(x) and Preclude(x, merlina) -> not Sensitize(x, merlina))\nforall x (Germfree(x) -> not Equitable(x))\nRummage(cacilia, merlina) and not Sensitize(merlina, cacilia) -> Germfree(cacilia)\n\nnot Germfree(merlina)\n\nnot Germfree(merlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The sher pulverise the kally. The kally trade the sher. If the sher overlay the kally then the kally is secretory. If something pulverise the sher then the sher overlay the kally. If something pulverise the kally then it pulverise the sher. If something overlay the kally then the kally is not size. If something pulverise the kally and the kally overlay the sher then the kally trade the sher. If something is fell and it pulverise the kally then it does not eat the kally. All dominated things are not fell. If the sher overlay the kally and the kally does not eat the sher then the sher is dominated. The sher is fell.", "logic": "\nPulverise(sher, kally)\nTrade(kally, sher)\nOverlay(sher, kally) -> Secretory(kally)\nforall x (Pulverise(x, sher) -> Overlay(sher, kally))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, kally) -> Pulverise(x, sher))\nforall x (Overlay(x, kally) -> not Size(kally))\nforall x (Pulverise(x, kally) and Overlay(kally, sher) -> Trade(kally, sher))\nforall x (Fell(x) and Pulverise(x, kally) -> not Trade(x, kally))\nforall x (Dominated(x) -> not Fell(x))\nOverlay(sher, kally) and not Trade(kally, sher) -> Dominated(sher)\n\nFell(sher)\n\nFell(sher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The pietra corral the norri. The norri toboggan the pietra. If the pietra build the norri then the norri is dolourous. If something corral the pietra then the pietra build the norri. If something corral the norri then it corral the pietra. If something build the norri then the norri is not southward. If something corral the norri and the norri build the pietra then the norri toboggan the pietra. If something is aching and it corral the norri then it does not eat the norri. All crossbred things are not aching. If the pietra build the norri and the norri does not eat the pietra then the pietra is crossbred. The norri is not aching.", "logic": "\nCorral(pietra, norri)\nToboggan(norri, pietra)\nBuild(pietra, norri) -> Dolourous(norri)\nforall x (Corral(x, pietra) -> Build(pietra, norri))\nforall x (Corral(x, norri) -> Corral(x, pietra))\nforall x (Build(x, norri) -> not Southward(norri))\nforall x (Corral(x, norri) and Build(norri, pietra) -> Toboggan(norri, pietra))\nforall x (Aching(x) and Corral(x, norri) -> not Toboggan(x, norri))\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> not Aching(x))\nBuild(pietra, norri) and not Toboggan(norri, pietra) -> Crossbred(pietra)\n\nnot Aching(norri)\n\nnot Aching(norri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The danya salaam the kellie. The kellie cartoon the danya. If the danya detoxify the kellie then the kellie is agnatic. If something salaam the danya then the danya detoxify the kellie. If something salaam the kellie then it salaam the danya. If something detoxify the kellie then the kellie is not licentious. If something salaam the kellie and the kellie detoxify the danya then the kellie cartoon the danya. If something is exogamous and it salaam the kellie then it does not eat the kellie. All scaled things are not exogamous. If the danya detoxify the kellie and the kellie does not eat the danya then the danya is scaled. The danya is agnatic.", "logic": "\nSalaam(danya, kellie)\nCartoon(kellie, danya)\nDetoxify(danya, kellie) -> Agnatic(kellie)\nforall x (Salaam(x, danya) -> Detoxify(danya, kellie))\nforall x (Salaam(x, kellie) -> Salaam(x, danya))\nforall x (Detoxify(x, kellie) -> not Licentious(kellie))\nforall x (Salaam(x, kellie) and Detoxify(kellie, danya) -> Cartoon(kellie, danya))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) and Salaam(x, kellie) -> not Cartoon(x, kellie))\nforall x (Scaled(x) -> not Exogamous(x))\nDetoxify(danya, kellie) and not Cartoon(kellie, danya) -> Scaled(danya)\n\nAgnatic(danya)\n\nAgnatic(danya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The maryellen guffaw the gretel. The gretel exsert the maryellen. If the maryellen bloody the gretel then the gretel is analeptic. If something guffaw the maryellen then the maryellen bloody the gretel. If something guffaw the gretel then it guffaw the maryellen. If something bloody the gretel then the gretel is not empathetic. If something guffaw the gretel and the gretel bloody the maryellen then the gretel exsert the maryellen. If something is convex and it guffaw the gretel then it does not eat the gretel. All duplicate things are not convex. If the maryellen bloody the gretel and the gretel does not eat the maryellen then the maryellen is duplicate. The maryellen does not eat the maryellen.", "logic": "\nGuffaw(maryellen, gretel)\nExsert(gretel, maryellen)\nBloody(maryellen, gretel) -> Analeptic(gretel)\nforall x (Guffaw(x, maryellen) -> Bloody(maryellen, gretel))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, gretel) -> Guffaw(x, maryellen))\nforall x (Bloody(x, gretel) -> not Empathetic(gretel))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, gretel) and Bloody(gretel, maryellen) -> Exsert(gretel, maryellen))\nforall x (Convex(x) and Guffaw(x, gretel) -> not Exsert(x, gretel))\nforall x (Duplicate(x) -> not Convex(x))\nBloody(maryellen, gretel) and not Exsert(gretel, maryellen) -> Duplicate(maryellen)\n\nnot Exsert(maryellen, maryellen)\n\nnot Exsert(maryellen, maryellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The andri slope the filbert. The filbert practice the andri. If the andri fraternise the filbert then the filbert is notifiable. If something slope the andri then the andri fraternise the filbert. If something slope the filbert then it slope the andri. If something fraternise the filbert then the filbert is not thousand. If something slope the filbert and the filbert fraternise the andri then the filbert practice the andri. If something is scowling and it slope the filbert then it does not eat the filbert. All sardinian things are not scowling. If the andri fraternise the filbert and the filbert does not eat the andri then the andri is sardinian. The filbert slope the filbert.", "logic": "\nSlope(andri, filbert)\nPractice(filbert, andri)\nFraternise(andri, filbert) -> Notifiable(filbert)\nforall x (Slope(x, andri) -> Fraternise(andri, filbert))\nforall x (Slope(x, filbert) -> Slope(x, andri))\nforall x (Fraternise(x, filbert) -> not Thousand(filbert))\nforall x (Slope(x, filbert) and Fraternise(filbert, andri) -> Practice(filbert, andri))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Slope(x, filbert) -> not Practice(x, filbert))\nforall x (Sardinian(x) -> not Scowling(x))\nFraternise(andri, filbert) and not Practice(filbert, andri) -> Sardinian(andri)\n\nSlope(filbert, filbert)\n\nSlope(filbert, filbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1191"} {"premises": "The lucita bootstrap the sheppard. The sheppard edge the lucita. If something edge the lucita then the lucita is mythologic. If something recount the sheppard and it edge the sheppard then it recount the lucita. The lucita bootstrap the sheppard.", "logic": "\nBootstrap(lucita, sheppard)\nEdge(sheppard, lucita)\nforall x (Edge(x, lucita) -> Mythologic(lucita))\nforall x (Recount(x, sheppard) and Edge(x, sheppard) -> Recount(x, lucita))\n\nBootstrap(lucita, sheppard)\n\ntherefore Bootstrap(lucita, sheppard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2068"} {"premises": "The louella crenellate the bari. The bari rubify the louella. If something rubify the louella then the louella is final. If something resplend the bari and it rubify the bari then it resplend the louella. The bari does not chase the louella.", "logic": "\nCrenellate(louella, bari)\nRubify(bari, louella)\nforall x (Rubify(x, louella) -> Final(louella))\nforall x (Resplend(x, bari) and Rubify(x, bari) -> Resplend(x, louella))\n\nnot Rubify(bari, louella)\n\ntherefore Rubify(bari, louella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2068"} {"premises": "The dino whitewash the kayla. The kayla canter the dino. If something canter the dino then the dino is emeritus. If something forsake the kayla and it canter the kayla then it forsake the dino. The dino does not need the dino.", "logic": "\nWhitewash(dino, kayla)\nCanter(kayla, dino)\nforall x (Canter(x, dino) -> Emeritus(dino))\nforall x (Forsake(x, kayla) and Canter(x, kayla) -> Forsake(x, dino))\n\nnot Forsake(dino, dino)\n\nforall x (Forsake(x, kayla) and Canter(x, kayla) -> Forsake(x, dino)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2068"} {"premises": "The cinnamon chalk the torre. The torre sporulate the cinnamon. If something sporulate the cinnamon then the cinnamon is arcuate. If something staunch the torre and it sporulate the torre then it staunch the cinnamon. The cinnamon chalk the cinnamon.", "logic": "\nChalk(cinnamon, torre)\nSporulate(torre, cinnamon)\nforall x (Sporulate(x, cinnamon) -> Arcuate(cinnamon))\nforall x (Staunch(x, torre) and Sporulate(x, torre) -> Staunch(x, cinnamon))\n\nChalk(cinnamon, cinnamon)\n\nChalk(cinnamon, cinnamon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2068"} {"premises": "Hedvig is trabeate. Hedvig is biennial. Mairead is limacoid. Mairead is not scabby. Mairead is avowed. Almeda is biennial. Almeda is avowed. If something is limacoid then it is not scabby. If Hedvig is dermal then Hedvig is limacoid. If something is dermal then it is limacoid. If Mairead is scabby then Mairead is not dermal. Nice things are avowed. If something is scabby then it is avowed. Quiet things are dermal. If Mairead is not dermal then Mairead is avowed. Hedvig is biennial.", "logic": "\nTrabeate(hedvig)\nBiennial(hedvig)\nLimacoid(mairead)\nnot Scabby(mairead)\nAvowed(mairead)\nBiennial(almeda)\nAvowed(almeda)\nforall x (Limacoid(x) -> not Scabby(x))\nDermal(hedvig) -> Limacoid(hedvig)\nforall x (Dermal(x) -> Limacoid(x))\nScabby(mairead) -> not Dermal(mairead)\nforall x (Scabby(x) -> Avowed(x))\nforall x (Scabby(x) -> Avowed(x))\nforall x (Biennial(x) -> Dermal(x))\nnot Dermal(mairead) -> Avowed(mairead)\n\nBiennial(hedvig)\n\ntherefore Biennial(hedvig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "See is stylistic. See is senile. Randolph is pricey. Randolph is not fleecy. Randolph is anticlinal. Olympie is senile. Olympie is anticlinal. If something is pricey then it is not fleecy. If See is validatory then See is pricey. If something is validatory then it is pricey. If Randolph is fleecy then Randolph is not validatory. Nice things are anticlinal. If something is fleecy then it is anticlinal. Quiet things are validatory. If Randolph is not validatory then Randolph is anticlinal. Olympie is not senile.", "logic": "\nStylistic(see)\nSenile(see)\nPricey(randolph)\nnot Fleecy(randolph)\nAnticlinal(randolph)\nSenile(olympie)\nAnticlinal(olympie)\nforall x (Pricey(x) -> not Fleecy(x))\nValidatory(see) -> Pricey(see)\nforall x (Validatory(x) -> Pricey(x))\nFleecy(randolph) -> not Validatory(randolph)\nforall x (Fleecy(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nforall x (Fleecy(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Validatory(x))\nnot Validatory(randolph) -> Anticlinal(randolph)\n\nnot Senile(olympie)\n\ntherefore Senile(olympie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Jaquith is natty. Jaquith is impelling. Lisabeth is heartless. Lisabeth is not hmong. Lisabeth is lachrymose. Eloise is impelling. Eloise is lachrymose. If something is heartless then it is not hmong. If Jaquith is deluxe then Jaquith is heartless. If something is deluxe then it is heartless. If Lisabeth is hmong then Lisabeth is not deluxe. Nice things are lachrymose. If something is hmong then it is lachrymose. Quiet things are deluxe. If Lisabeth is not deluxe then Lisabeth is lachrymose. Jaquith is deluxe.", "logic": "\nNatty(jaquith)\nImpelling(jaquith)\nHeartless(lisabeth)\nnot Hmong(lisabeth)\nLachrymose(lisabeth)\nImpelling(eloise)\nLachrymose(eloise)\nforall x (Heartless(x) -> not Hmong(x))\nDeluxe(jaquith) -> Heartless(jaquith)\nforall x (Deluxe(x) -> Heartless(x))\nHmong(lisabeth) -> not Deluxe(lisabeth)\nforall x (Hmong(x) -> Lachrymose(x))\nforall x (Hmong(x) -> Lachrymose(x))\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nnot Deluxe(lisabeth) -> Lachrymose(lisabeth)\n\nDeluxe(jaquith)\n\nImpelling(jaquith) and forall x (Impelling(x) -> Deluxe(x)) -> therefore Deluxe(jaquith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Minnie is allopathic. Minnie is acquainted. Kira is hunched. Kira is not dactylic. Kira is disgusting. Micheil is acquainted. Micheil is disgusting. If something is hunched then it is not dactylic. If Minnie is junior then Minnie is hunched. If something is junior then it is hunched. If Kira is dactylic then Kira is not junior. Nice things are disgusting. If something is dactylic then it is disgusting. Quiet things are junior. If Kira is not junior then Kira is disgusting. Micheil is not junior.", "logic": "\nAllopathic(minnie)\nAcquainted(minnie)\nHunched(kira)\nnot Dactylic(kira)\nDisgusting(kira)\nAcquainted(micheil)\nDisgusting(micheil)\nforall x (Hunched(x) -> not Dactylic(x))\nJunior(minnie) -> Hunched(minnie)\nforall x (Junior(x) -> Hunched(x))\nDactylic(kira) -> not Junior(kira)\nforall x (Dactylic(x) -> Disgusting(x))\nforall x (Dactylic(x) -> Disgusting(x))\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> Junior(x))\nnot Junior(kira) -> Disgusting(kira)\n\nnot Junior(micheil)\n\nAcquainted(micheil) and forall x (Acquainted(x) -> Junior(x)) -> therefore Junior(micheil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Albertine is imprisoned. Albertine is oral. Atlanta is sceptical. Atlanta is not swagger. Atlanta is erect. Alfonso is oral. Alfonso is erect. If something is sceptical then it is not swagger. If Albertine is flowered then Albertine is sceptical. If something is flowered then it is sceptical. If Atlanta is swagger then Atlanta is not flowered. Nice things are erect. If something is swagger then it is erect. Quiet things are flowered. If Atlanta is not flowered then Atlanta is erect. Albertine is sceptical.", "logic": "\nImprisoned(albertine)\nOral(albertine)\nSceptical(atlanta)\nnot Swagger(atlanta)\nErect(atlanta)\nOral(alfonso)\nErect(alfonso)\nforall x (Sceptical(x) -> not Swagger(x))\nFlowered(albertine) -> Sceptical(albertine)\nforall x (Flowered(x) -> Sceptical(x))\nSwagger(atlanta) -> not Flowered(atlanta)\nforall x (Swagger(x) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Swagger(x) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Oral(x) -> Flowered(x))\nnot Flowered(atlanta) -> Erect(atlanta)\n\nSceptical(albertine)\n\nOral(albertine) and forall x (Oral(x) -> Flowered(x)) -> therefore Flowered(albertine) Flowered(albertine) and Flowered(albertine) -> Sceptical(albertine) -> therefore Sceptical(albertine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Joe is decimal. Joe is lightless. Celia is rimed. Celia is not adjacent. Celia is embryonal. Jorrie is lightless. Jorrie is embryonal. If something is rimed then it is not adjacent. If Joe is unafraid then Joe is rimed. If something is unafraid then it is rimed. If Celia is adjacent then Celia is not unafraid. Nice things are embryonal. If something is adjacent then it is embryonal. Quiet things are unafraid. If Celia is not unafraid then Celia is embryonal. Jorrie is not rimed.", "logic": "\nDecimal(joe)\nLightless(joe)\nRimed(celia)\nnot Adjacent(celia)\nEmbryonal(celia)\nLightless(jorrie)\nEmbryonal(jorrie)\nforall x (Rimed(x) -> not Adjacent(x))\nUnafraid(joe) -> Rimed(joe)\nforall x (Unafraid(x) -> Rimed(x))\nAdjacent(celia) -> not Unafraid(celia)\nforall x (Adjacent(x) -> Embryonal(x))\nforall x (Adjacent(x) -> Embryonal(x))\nforall x (Lightless(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nnot Unafraid(celia) -> Embryonal(celia)\n\nnot Rimed(jorrie)\n\nLightless(jorrie) and forall x (Lightless(x) -> Unafraid(x)) -> therefore Unafraid(jorrie) Unafraid(jorrie) and forall x (Unafraid(x) -> Rimed(x)) -> therefore Rimed(jorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Leticia is athirst. Leticia is anginous. Andrey is blowsy. Andrey is not lowering. Andrey is reedlike. Pam is anginous. Pam is reedlike. If something is blowsy then it is not lowering. If Leticia is equestrian then Leticia is blowsy. If something is equestrian then it is blowsy. If Andrey is lowering then Andrey is not equestrian. Nice things are reedlike. If something is lowering then it is reedlike. Quiet things are equestrian. If Andrey is not equestrian then Andrey is reedlike. Pam is not lowering.", "logic": "\nAthirst(leticia)\nAnginous(leticia)\nBlowsy(andrey)\nnot Lowering(andrey)\nReedlike(andrey)\nAnginous(pam)\nReedlike(pam)\nforall x (Blowsy(x) -> not Lowering(x))\nEquestrian(leticia) -> Blowsy(leticia)\nforall x (Equestrian(x) -> Blowsy(x))\nLowering(andrey) -> not Equestrian(andrey)\nforall x (Lowering(x) -> Reedlike(x))\nforall x (Lowering(x) -> Reedlike(x))\nforall x (Anginous(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nnot Equestrian(andrey) -> Reedlike(andrey)\n\nnot Lowering(pam)\n\nAnginous(pam) and forall x (Anginous(x) -> Equestrian(x)) -> therefore Equestrian(pam) Equestrian(pam) and forall x (Equestrian(x) -> Blowsy(x)) -> therefore Blowsy(pam) Blowsy(pam) and forall x (Blowsy(x) -> not Lowering(x)) -> therefore not Lowering(pam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Marcello is demode. Marcello is pricy. Myrle is andorran. Myrle is not biannual. Myrle is here. Izabel is pricy. Izabel is here. If something is andorran then it is not biannual. If Marcello is blushful then Marcello is andorran. If something is blushful then it is andorran. If Myrle is biannual then Myrle is not blushful. Nice things are here. If something is biannual then it is here. Quiet things are blushful. If Myrle is not blushful then Myrle is here. Marcello is biannual.", "logic": "\nDemode(marcello)\nPricy(marcello)\nAndorran(myrle)\nnot Biannual(myrle)\nHere(myrle)\nPricy(izabel)\nHere(izabel)\nforall x (Andorran(x) -> not Biannual(x))\nBlushful(marcello) -> Andorran(marcello)\nforall x (Blushful(x) -> Andorran(x))\nBiannual(myrle) -> not Blushful(myrle)\nforall x (Biannual(x) -> Here(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) -> Here(x))\nforall x (Pricy(x) -> Blushful(x))\nnot Blushful(myrle) -> Here(myrle)\n\nBiannual(marcello)\n\nPricy(marcello) and forall x (Pricy(x) -> Blushful(x)) -> therefore Blushful(marcello) Blushful(marcello) and Blushful(marcello) -> Andorran(marcello) -> therefore Andorran(marcello) Andorran(marcello) and forall x (Andorran(x) -> not Biannual(x)) -> therefore not Biannual(marcello)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Debbi is moralistic. Debbi is thrilling. Ardenia is offshore. Ardenia is not active. Ardenia is daylong. Merralee is thrilling. Merralee is daylong. If something is offshore then it is not active. If Debbi is crummy then Debbi is offshore. If something is crummy then it is offshore. If Ardenia is active then Ardenia is not crummy. Nice things are daylong. If something is active then it is daylong. Quiet things are crummy. If Ardenia is not crummy then Ardenia is daylong. Ardenia is not crummy.", "logic": "\nMoralistic(debbi)\nThrilling(debbi)\nOffshore(ardenia)\nnot Active(ardenia)\nDaylong(ardenia)\nThrilling(merralee)\nDaylong(merralee)\nforall x (Offshore(x) -> not Active(x))\nCrummy(debbi) -> Offshore(debbi)\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Offshore(x))\nActive(ardenia) -> not Crummy(ardenia)\nforall x (Active(x) -> Daylong(x))\nforall x (Active(x) -> Daylong(x))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Crummy(x))\nnot Crummy(ardenia) -> Daylong(ardenia)\n\nnot Crummy(ardenia)\n\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Crummy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Abner is disputed. Abner is dentate. Rosamund is swollen. Rosamund is not repulsive. Rosamund is cadastral. Kalinda is dentate. Kalinda is cadastral. If something is swollen then it is not repulsive. If Abner is pyrectic then Abner is swollen. If something is pyrectic then it is swollen. If Rosamund is repulsive then Rosamund is not pyrectic. Nice things are cadastral. If something is repulsive then it is cadastral. Quiet things are pyrectic. If Rosamund is not pyrectic then Rosamund is cadastral. Abner is cadastral.", "logic": "\nDisputed(abner)\nDentate(abner)\nSwollen(rosamund)\nnot Repulsive(rosamund)\nCadastral(rosamund)\nDentate(kalinda)\nCadastral(kalinda)\nforall x (Swollen(x) -> not Repulsive(x))\nPyrectic(abner) -> Swollen(abner)\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) -> Swollen(x))\nRepulsive(rosamund) -> not Pyrectic(rosamund)\nforall x (Repulsive(x) -> Cadastral(x))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) -> Cadastral(x))\nforall x (Dentate(x) -> Pyrectic(x))\nnot Pyrectic(rosamund) -> Cadastral(rosamund)\n\nCadastral(abner)\n\nforall x (Repulsive(x) -> Cadastral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Zaria is vegetive. Zaria is inshore. Tarzan is lavish. Tarzan is not unfilmed. Tarzan is edentulate. Joyan is inshore. Joyan is edentulate. If something is lavish then it is not unfilmed. If Zaria is clubby then Zaria is lavish. If something is clubby then it is lavish. If Tarzan is unfilmed then Tarzan is not clubby. Nice things are edentulate. If something is unfilmed then it is edentulate. Quiet things are clubby. If Tarzan is not clubby then Tarzan is edentulate. Joyan is not green.", "logic": "\nVegetive(zaria)\nInshore(zaria)\nLavish(tarzan)\nnot Unfilmed(tarzan)\nEdentulate(tarzan)\nInshore(joyan)\nEdentulate(joyan)\nforall x (Lavish(x) -> not Unfilmed(x))\nClubby(zaria) -> Lavish(zaria)\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> Lavish(x))\nUnfilmed(tarzan) -> not Clubby(tarzan)\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nforall x (Inshore(x) -> Clubby(x))\nnot Clubby(tarzan) -> Edentulate(tarzan)\n\nnot Green(joyan)\n\nnot Green(joyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Sanson is proud. Sanson is reformable. Tobias is polish. Tobias is not taupe. Tobias is reassured. Zachary is reformable. Zachary is reassured. If something is polish then it is not taupe. If Sanson is trussed then Sanson is polish. If something is trussed then it is polish. If Tobias is taupe then Tobias is not trussed. Nice things are reassured. If something is taupe then it is reassured. Quiet things are trussed. If Tobias is not trussed then Tobias is reassured. Tobias is green.", "logic": "\nProud(sanson)\nReformable(sanson)\nPolish(tobias)\nnot Taupe(tobias)\nReassured(tobias)\nReformable(zachary)\nReassured(zachary)\nforall x (Polish(x) -> not Taupe(x))\nTrussed(sanson) -> Polish(sanson)\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Polish(x))\nTaupe(tobias) -> not Trussed(tobias)\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Reassured(x))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Reassured(x))\nforall x (Reformable(x) -> Trussed(x))\nnot Trussed(tobias) -> Reassured(tobias)\n\nGreen(tobias)\n\nGreen(tobias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Edin is cotyloidal. Edin is unadorned. Anurag is depicted. Anurag is not covetous. Anurag is embonpoint. Annalyse is unadorned. Annalyse is embonpoint. If something is depicted then it is not covetous. If Edin is arthurian then Edin is depicted. If something is arthurian then it is depicted. If Anurag is covetous then Anurag is not arthurian. Nice things are embonpoint. If something is covetous then it is embonpoint. Quiet things are arthurian. If Anurag is not arthurian then Anurag is embonpoint. Anurag is not cotyloidal.", "logic": "\nCotyloidal(edin)\nUnadorned(edin)\nDepicted(anurag)\nnot Covetous(anurag)\nEmbonpoint(anurag)\nUnadorned(annalyse)\nEmbonpoint(annalyse)\nforall x (Depicted(x) -> not Covetous(x))\nArthurian(edin) -> Depicted(edin)\nforall x (Arthurian(x) -> Depicted(x))\nCovetous(anurag) -> not Arthurian(anurag)\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Unadorned(x) -> Arthurian(x))\nnot Arthurian(anurag) -> Embonpoint(anurag)\n\nnot Cotyloidal(anurag)\n\nnot Cotyloidal(anurag) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Aleen is idealistic. Aleen is unbounded. Flossie is oxidized. Flossie is not passive. Flossie is cerise. Agatha is unbounded. Agatha is cerise. If something is oxidized then it is not passive. If Aleen is satiric then Aleen is oxidized. If something is satiric then it is oxidized. If Flossie is passive then Flossie is not satiric. Nice things are cerise. If something is passive then it is cerise. Quiet things are satiric. If Flossie is not satiric then Flossie is cerise. Flossie is unbounded.", "logic": "\nIdealistic(aleen)\nUnbounded(aleen)\nOxidized(flossie)\nnot Passive(flossie)\nCerise(flossie)\nUnbounded(agatha)\nCerise(agatha)\nforall x (Oxidized(x) -> not Passive(x))\nSatiric(aleen) -> Oxidized(aleen)\nforall x (Satiric(x) -> Oxidized(x))\nPassive(flossie) -> not Satiric(flossie)\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Passive(x) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Unbounded(x) -> Satiric(x))\nnot Satiric(flossie) -> Cerise(flossie)\n\nUnbounded(flossie)\n\nUnbounded(flossie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Rachelle is fimbriate. Rachelle is precocial. Nert is bruneian. Nert is not collusive. Nert is pugnacious. Missy is precocial. Missy is pugnacious. If something is bruneian then it is not collusive. If Rachelle is smiling then Rachelle is bruneian. If something is smiling then it is bruneian. If Nert is collusive then Nert is not smiling. Nice things are pugnacious. If something is collusive then it is pugnacious. Quiet things are smiling. If Nert is not smiling then Nert is pugnacious. Rachelle is not green.", "logic": "\nFimbriate(rachelle)\nPrecocial(rachelle)\nBruneian(nert)\nnot Collusive(nert)\nPugnacious(nert)\nPrecocial(missy)\nPugnacious(missy)\nforall x (Bruneian(x) -> not Collusive(x))\nSmiling(rachelle) -> Bruneian(rachelle)\nforall x (Smiling(x) -> Bruneian(x))\nCollusive(nert) -> not Smiling(nert)\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\nforall x (Precocial(x) -> Smiling(x))\nnot Smiling(nert) -> Pugnacious(nert)\n\nnot Green(rachelle)\n\nnot Green(rachelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Quintus is academic. Quintus is uncivil. Ehud is malted. Ehud is not unicuspid. Ehud is grown. Shirl is uncivil. Shirl is grown. If something is malted then it is not unicuspid. If Quintus is torturing then Quintus is malted. If something is torturing then it is malted. If Ehud is unicuspid then Ehud is not torturing. Nice things are grown. If something is unicuspid then it is grown. Quiet things are torturing. If Ehud is not torturing then Ehud is grown. Shirl is academic.", "logic": "\nAcademic(quintus)\nUncivil(quintus)\nMalted(ehud)\nnot Unicuspid(ehud)\nGrown(ehud)\nUncivil(shirl)\nGrown(shirl)\nforall x (Malted(x) -> not Unicuspid(x))\nTorturing(quintus) -> Malted(quintus)\nforall x (Torturing(x) -> Malted(x))\nUnicuspid(ehud) -> not Torturing(ehud)\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Uncivil(x) -> Torturing(x))\nnot Torturing(ehud) -> Grown(ehud)\n\nAcademic(shirl)\n\nAcademic(shirl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1375"} {"premises": "Darbie is zenithal. Darbie is moonlike. Darbie is referable. Young, unfit things are braised. If something is referable then it is knifelike. Rough, unfit things are gibelike. All referable things are zenithal. All knifelike, gibelike things are unfit. All unfit things are moonlike. Darbie is referable.", "logic": "\nZenithal(darbie)\nMoonlike(darbie)\nReferable(darbie)\nforall x (Referable(x) and Unfit(x) -> Braised(x))\nforall x (Referable(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Moonlike(x) and Unfit(x) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Referable(x) -> Zenithal(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) and Gibelike(x) -> Unfit(x))\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Moonlike(x))\n\nReferable(darbie)\n\ntherefore Referable(darbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1410"} {"premises": "Willow is alienated. Willow is felonious. Willow is individual. Young, frightful things are auricular. If something is individual then it is dilatory. Rough, frightful things are absent. All individual things are alienated. All dilatory, absent things are frightful. All frightful things are felonious. Willow is not alienated.", "logic": "\nAlienated(willow)\nFelonious(willow)\nIndividual(willow)\nforall x (Individual(x) and Frightful(x) -> Auricular(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) -> Dilatory(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) and Frightful(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Individual(x) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) and Absent(x) -> Frightful(x))\nforall x (Frightful(x) -> Felonious(x))\n\nnot Alienated(willow)\n\ntherefore Alienated(willow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1410"} {"premises": "Tressa is anterior. Tressa is aneuploid. Tressa is consequent. Young, glooming things are sufficient. If something is consequent then it is spatial. Rough, glooming things are unerect. All consequent things are anterior. All spatial, unerect things are glooming. All glooming things are aneuploid. Tressa is spatial.", "logic": "\nAnterior(tressa)\nAneuploid(tressa)\nConsequent(tressa)\nforall x (Consequent(x) and Glooming(x) -> Sufficient(x))\nforall x (Consequent(x) -> Spatial(x))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) and Glooming(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Consequent(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Spatial(x) and Unerect(x) -> Glooming(x))\nforall x (Glooming(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\n\nSpatial(tressa)\n\nConsequent(tressa) and forall x (Consequent(x) -> Spatial(x)) -> therefore Spatial(tressa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1410"} {"premises": "Brigit is snuggled. Brigit is pretended. Brigit is acapnotic. Young, civilian things are extendible. If something is acapnotic then it is absorbable. Rough, civilian things are flagellate. All acapnotic things are snuggled. All absorbable, flagellate things are civilian. All civilian things are pretended. Brigit is not absorbable.", "logic": "\nSnuggled(brigit)\nPretended(brigit)\nAcapnotic(brigit)\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) and Civilian(x) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Absorbable(x))\nforall x (Pretended(x) and Civilian(x) -> Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Snuggled(x))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) and Flagellate(x) -> Civilian(x))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Pretended(x))\n\nnot Absorbable(brigit)\n\nAcapnotic(brigit) and forall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Absorbable(x)) -> therefore Absorbable(brigit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1410"} {"premises": "Alfred is threadlike. Alfred is shipboard. Alfred is indexless. Young, bipartisan things are southmost. If something is indexless then it is untypical. Rough, bipartisan things are superable. All indexless things are threadlike. All untypical, superable things are bipartisan. All bipartisan things are shipboard. Alfred is not superable.", "logic": "\nThreadlike(alfred)\nShipboard(alfred)\nIndexless(alfred)\nforall x (Indexless(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Untypical(x))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Superable(x))\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Threadlike(x))\nforall x (Untypical(x) and Superable(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Shipboard(x))\n\nnot Superable(alfred)\n\nforall x (Shipboard(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Superable(x)) <- forall x (Untypical(x) and Superable(x) -> Bipartisan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1410"} {"premises": "Thibaud is northbound. Thibaud is leisured. Thibaud is panoptic. Young, haggard things are sagacious. If something is panoptic then it is gangrenous. Rough, haggard things are soporific. All panoptic things are northbound. All gangrenous, soporific things are haggard. All haggard things are leisured. Thibaud is haggard.", "logic": "\nNorthbound(thibaud)\nLeisured(thibaud)\nPanoptic(thibaud)\nforall x (Panoptic(x) and Haggard(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Gangrenous(x))\nforall x (Leisured(x) and Haggard(x) -> Soporific(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> Northbound(x))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) and Soporific(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Leisured(x))\n\nHaggard(thibaud)\n\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) and Soporific(x) -> Haggard(x)) <- forall x (Leisured(x) and Haggard(x) -> Soporific(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1410"} {"premises": "The adele carp the sula. The adele zinc the candis. The adele pique the kelly. The adele pique the sula. The adele pique the candis. The kelly carp the sula. The kelly is muddy. The kelly is noduled. The sula carp the candis. The sula is muddy. The sula zinc the candis. The sula pique the candis. The candis carp the adele. The candis carp the sula. The candis pique the kelly. The candis pique the sula. If the kelly is surgical and the kelly carp the sula then the kelly is pregnant. The adele pique the sula.", "logic": "\nCarp(adele, sula)\nZinc(adele, candis)\nPique(adele, kelly)\nPique(adele, sula)\nPique(adele, candis)\nCarp(kelly, sula)\nMuddy(kelly)\nNoduled(kelly)\nCarp(sula, candis)\nMuddy(sula)\nZinc(sula, candis)\nPique(sula, candis)\nCarp(candis, adele)\nCarp(candis, sula)\nPique(candis, kelly)\nPique(candis, sula)\nSurgical(kelly) and Carp(kelly, sula) -> Pregnant(kelly)\n\nPique(adele, sula)\n\ntherefore Pique(adele, sula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1442"} {"premises": "The gregg shatter the janaya. The gregg flunk the sonny. The gregg embroider the lauretta. The gregg embroider the janaya. The gregg embroider the sonny. The lauretta shatter the janaya. The lauretta is shaded. The lauretta is synonymous. The janaya shatter the sonny. The janaya is shaded. The janaya flunk the sonny. The janaya embroider the sonny. The sonny shatter the gregg. The sonny shatter the janaya. The sonny embroider the lauretta. The sonny embroider the janaya. If the lauretta is allegiant and the lauretta shatter the janaya then the lauretta is moonlit. The janaya does not like the sonny.", "logic": "\nShatter(gregg, janaya)\nFlunk(gregg, sonny)\nEmbroider(gregg, lauretta)\nEmbroider(gregg, janaya)\nEmbroider(gregg, sonny)\nShatter(lauretta, janaya)\nShaded(lauretta)\nSynonymous(lauretta)\nShatter(janaya, sonny)\nShaded(janaya)\nFlunk(janaya, sonny)\nEmbroider(janaya, sonny)\nShatter(sonny, gregg)\nShatter(sonny, janaya)\nEmbroider(sonny, lauretta)\nEmbroider(sonny, janaya)\nAllegiant(lauretta) and Shatter(lauretta, janaya) -> Moonlit(lauretta)\n\nnot Flunk(janaya, sonny)\n\ntherefore Flunk(janaya, sonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1442"} {"premises": "The ilene subpoena the anica. The ilene complain the desdemona. The ilene invite the kermit. The ilene invite the anica. The ilene invite the desdemona. The kermit subpoena the anica. The kermit is formulated. The kermit is inhumane. The anica subpoena the desdemona. The anica is formulated. The anica complain the desdemona. The anica invite the desdemona. The desdemona subpoena the ilene. The desdemona subpoena the anica. The desdemona invite the kermit. The desdemona invite the anica. If the kermit is olfactory and the kermit subpoena the anica then the kermit is unitarian. The kermit is not unitarian.", "logic": "\nSubpoena(ilene, anica)\nComplain(ilene, desdemona)\nInvite(ilene, kermit)\nInvite(ilene, anica)\nInvite(ilene, desdemona)\nSubpoena(kermit, anica)\nFormulated(kermit)\nInhumane(kermit)\nSubpoena(anica, desdemona)\nFormulated(anica)\nComplain(anica, desdemona)\nInvite(anica, desdemona)\nSubpoena(desdemona, ilene)\nSubpoena(desdemona, anica)\nInvite(desdemona, kermit)\nInvite(desdemona, anica)\nOlfactory(kermit) and Subpoena(kermit, anica) -> Unitarian(kermit)\n\nnot Unitarian(kermit)\n\nOlfactory(kermit) and Subpoena(kermit, anica) -> Unitarian(kermit) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1442"} {"premises": "The emmaline trademark the prasun. The emmaline malversate the erina. The emmaline besprinkle the lysandra. The emmaline besprinkle the prasun. The emmaline besprinkle the erina. The lysandra trademark the prasun. The lysandra is civilized. The lysandra is fugitive. The prasun trademark the erina. The prasun is civilized. The prasun malversate the erina. The prasun besprinkle the erina. The erina trademark the emmaline. The erina trademark the prasun. The erina besprinkle the lysandra. The erina besprinkle the prasun. If the lysandra is tutelary and the lysandra trademark the prasun then the lysandra is expiable. The prasun besprinkle the prasun.", "logic": "\nTrademark(emmaline, prasun)\nMalversate(emmaline, erina)\nBesprinkle(emmaline, lysandra)\nBesprinkle(emmaline, prasun)\nBesprinkle(emmaline, erina)\nTrademark(lysandra, prasun)\nCivilized(lysandra)\nFugitive(lysandra)\nTrademark(prasun, erina)\nCivilized(prasun)\nMalversate(prasun, erina)\nBesprinkle(prasun, erina)\nTrademark(erina, emmaline)\nTrademark(erina, prasun)\nBesprinkle(erina, lysandra)\nBesprinkle(erina, prasun)\nTutelary(lysandra) and Trademark(lysandra, prasun) -> Expiable(lysandra)\n\nBesprinkle(prasun, prasun)\n\nBesprinkle(prasun, prasun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1442"} {"premises": "The renell bulletin the marlin. The renell is edentulous. The renell decrypt the rachael. The renell decrypt the marlin. The renell deodourise the marlin. The rachael is teensy. The rachael is bifocal. The rachael is edentulous. The rachael is orientated. The rachael deodourise the renell. The marlin bulletin the renell. The marlin bulletin the rachael. The marlin is undetected. The marlin is edentulous. The marlin decrypt the rachael. The marlin deodourise the renell. If something deodourise the rachael and it bulletin the rachael then it deodourise the marlin. If the marlin deodourise the renell and the renell decrypt the rachael then the marlin deodourise the rachael. If something deodourise the marlin then it is bifocal. The renell deodourise the marlin.", "logic": "\nBulletin(renell, marlin)\nEdentulous(renell)\nDecrypt(renell, rachael)\nDecrypt(renell, marlin)\nDeodourise(renell, marlin)\nTeensy(rachael)\nBifocal(rachael)\nEdentulous(rachael)\nOrientated(rachael)\nDeodourise(rachael, renell)\nBulletin(marlin, renell)\nBulletin(marlin, rachael)\nUndetected(marlin)\nEdentulous(marlin)\nDecrypt(marlin, rachael)\nDeodourise(marlin, renell)\nforall x (Deodourise(x, rachael) and Bulletin(x, rachael) -> Deodourise(x, marlin))\nDeodourise(marlin, renell) and Decrypt(renell, rachael) -> Deodourise(marlin, rachael)\nforall x (Deodourise(x, marlin) -> Bifocal(x))\n\nDeodourise(renell, marlin)\n\ntherefore Deodourise(renell, marlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The spenser bunt the marj. The spenser is narcotic. The spenser disregard the avrit. The spenser disregard the marj. The spenser goffer the marj. The avrit is hardline. The avrit is anabolic. The avrit is narcotic. The avrit is daily. The avrit goffer the spenser. The marj bunt the spenser. The marj bunt the avrit. The marj is wizard. The marj is narcotic. The marj disregard the avrit. The marj goffer the spenser. If something goffer the avrit and it bunt the avrit then it goffer the marj. If the marj goffer the spenser and the spenser disregard the avrit then the marj goffer the avrit. If something goffer the marj then it is anabolic. The marj does not like the avrit.", "logic": "\nBunt(spenser, marj)\nNarcotic(spenser)\nDisregard(spenser, avrit)\nDisregard(spenser, marj)\nGoffer(spenser, marj)\nHardline(avrit)\nAnabolic(avrit)\nNarcotic(avrit)\nDaily(avrit)\nGoffer(avrit, spenser)\nBunt(marj, spenser)\nBunt(marj, avrit)\nWizard(marj)\nNarcotic(marj)\nDisregard(marj, avrit)\nGoffer(marj, spenser)\nforall x (Goffer(x, avrit) and Bunt(x, avrit) -> Goffer(x, marj))\nGoffer(marj, spenser) and Disregard(spenser, avrit) -> Goffer(marj, avrit)\nforall x (Goffer(x, marj) -> Anabolic(x))\n\nnot Disregard(marj, avrit)\n\ntherefore Disregard(marj, avrit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The kingston stain the bobine. The kingston is widespread. The kingston mortise the ashely. The kingston mortise the bobine. The kingston estivate the bobine. The ashely is rested. The ashely is nutbrown. The ashely is widespread. The ashely is socialised. The ashely estivate the kingston. The bobine stain the kingston. The bobine stain the ashely. The bobine is coltish. The bobine is widespread. The bobine mortise the ashely. The bobine estivate the kingston. If something estivate the ashely and it stain the ashely then it estivate the bobine. If the bobine estivate the kingston and the kingston mortise the ashely then the bobine estivate the ashely. If something estivate the bobine then it is nutbrown. The kingston is nutbrown.", "logic": "\nStain(kingston, bobine)\nWidespread(kingston)\nMortise(kingston, ashely)\nMortise(kingston, bobine)\nEstivate(kingston, bobine)\nRested(ashely)\nNutbrown(ashely)\nWidespread(ashely)\nSocialised(ashely)\nEstivate(ashely, kingston)\nStain(bobine, kingston)\nStain(bobine, ashely)\nColtish(bobine)\nWidespread(bobine)\nMortise(bobine, ashely)\nEstivate(bobine, kingston)\nforall x (Estivate(x, ashely) and Stain(x, ashely) -> Estivate(x, bobine))\nEstivate(bobine, kingston) and Mortise(kingston, ashely) -> Estivate(bobine, ashely)\nforall x (Estivate(x, bobine) -> Nutbrown(x))\n\nNutbrown(kingston)\n\nEstivate(kingston, bobine) and forall x (Estivate(x, bobine) -> Nutbrown(x)) -> therefore Nutbrown(kingston)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The leland cloy the lynnelle. The leland is puffy. The leland calcine the thatcher. The leland calcine the lynnelle. The leland shrive the lynnelle. The thatcher is bifoliate. The thatcher is demented. The thatcher is puffy. The thatcher is tributary. The thatcher shrive the leland. The lynnelle cloy the leland. The lynnelle cloy the thatcher. The lynnelle is goodly. The lynnelle is puffy. The lynnelle calcine the thatcher. The lynnelle shrive the leland. If something shrive the thatcher and it cloy the thatcher then it shrive the lynnelle. If the lynnelle shrive the leland and the leland calcine the thatcher then the lynnelle shrive the thatcher. If something shrive the lynnelle then it is demented. The lynnelle does not visit the thatcher.", "logic": "\nCloy(leland, lynnelle)\nPuffy(leland)\nCalcine(leland, thatcher)\nCalcine(leland, lynnelle)\nShrive(leland, lynnelle)\nBifoliate(thatcher)\nDemented(thatcher)\nPuffy(thatcher)\nTributary(thatcher)\nShrive(thatcher, leland)\nCloy(lynnelle, leland)\nCloy(lynnelle, thatcher)\nGoodly(lynnelle)\nPuffy(lynnelle)\nCalcine(lynnelle, thatcher)\nShrive(lynnelle, leland)\nforall x (Shrive(x, thatcher) and Cloy(x, thatcher) -> Shrive(x, lynnelle))\nShrive(lynnelle, leland) and Calcine(leland, thatcher) -> Shrive(lynnelle, thatcher)\nforall x (Shrive(x, lynnelle) -> Demented(x))\n\nnot Shrive(lynnelle, thatcher)\n\nShrive(lynnelle, leland) and Calcine(leland, thatcher) and Shrive(lynnelle, leland) and Calcine(leland, thatcher) -> Shrive(lynnelle, thatcher) -> therefore Shrive(lynnelle, thatcher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The tatum snow the kerianne. The tatum is sopranino. The tatum forsake the modestia. The tatum forsake the kerianne. The tatum volunteer the kerianne. The modestia is assonant. The modestia is cartesian. The modestia is sopranino. The modestia is puissant. The modestia volunteer the tatum. The kerianne snow the tatum. The kerianne snow the modestia. The kerianne is equatorial. The kerianne is sopranino. The kerianne forsake the modestia. The kerianne volunteer the tatum. If something volunteer the modestia and it snow the modestia then it volunteer the kerianne. If the kerianne volunteer the tatum and the tatum forsake the modestia then the kerianne volunteer the modestia. If something volunteer the kerianne then it is cartesian. The kerianne volunteer the kerianne.", "logic": "\nSnow(tatum, kerianne)\nSopranino(tatum)\nForsake(tatum, modestia)\nForsake(tatum, kerianne)\nVolunteer(tatum, kerianne)\nAssonant(modestia)\nCartesian(modestia)\nSopranino(modestia)\nPuissant(modestia)\nVolunteer(modestia, tatum)\nSnow(kerianne, tatum)\nSnow(kerianne, modestia)\nEquatorial(kerianne)\nSopranino(kerianne)\nForsake(kerianne, modestia)\nVolunteer(kerianne, tatum)\nforall x (Volunteer(x, modestia) and Snow(x, modestia) -> Volunteer(x, kerianne))\nVolunteer(kerianne, tatum) and Forsake(tatum, modestia) -> Volunteer(kerianne, modestia)\nforall x (Volunteer(x, kerianne) -> Cartesian(x))\n\nVolunteer(kerianne, kerianne)\n\nVolunteer(kerianne, tatum) and Forsake(tatum, modestia) and Volunteer(kerianne, tatum) and Forsake(tatum, modestia) -> Volunteer(kerianne, modestia) -> therefore Volunteer(kerianne, modestia) Volunteer(kerianne, modestia) and Snow(kerianne, modestia) and forall x (Volunteer(x, modestia) and Snow(x, modestia) -> Volunteer(x, kerianne)) -> therefore Volunteer(kerianne, kerianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The dorita bereave the milton. The dorita is pederastic. The dorita vamp the kurtis. The dorita vamp the milton. The dorita trade the milton. The kurtis is palpatory. The kurtis is serbian. The kurtis is pederastic. The kurtis is capricious. The kurtis trade the dorita. The milton bereave the dorita. The milton bereave the kurtis. The milton is vindictive. The milton is pederastic. The milton vamp the kurtis. The milton trade the dorita. If something trade the kurtis and it bereave the kurtis then it trade the milton. If the milton trade the dorita and the dorita vamp the kurtis then the milton trade the kurtis. If something trade the milton then it is serbian. The milton does not visit the milton.", "logic": "\nBereave(dorita, milton)\nPederastic(dorita)\nVamp(dorita, kurtis)\nVamp(dorita, milton)\nTrade(dorita, milton)\nPalpatory(kurtis)\nSerbian(kurtis)\nPederastic(kurtis)\nCapricious(kurtis)\nTrade(kurtis, dorita)\nBereave(milton, dorita)\nBereave(milton, kurtis)\nVindictive(milton)\nPederastic(milton)\nVamp(milton, kurtis)\nTrade(milton, dorita)\nforall x (Trade(x, kurtis) and Bereave(x, kurtis) -> Trade(x, milton))\nTrade(milton, dorita) and Vamp(dorita, kurtis) -> Trade(milton, kurtis)\nforall x (Trade(x, milton) -> Serbian(x))\n\nnot Trade(milton, milton)\n\nTrade(milton, dorita) and Vamp(dorita, kurtis) and Trade(milton, dorita) and Vamp(dorita, kurtis) -> Trade(milton, kurtis) -> therefore Trade(milton, kurtis) Trade(milton, kurtis) and Bereave(milton, kurtis) and forall x (Trade(x, kurtis) and Bereave(x, kurtis) -> Trade(x, milton)) -> therefore Trade(milton, milton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The maressa noise the karissa. The maressa is light. The maressa humble the aidan. The maressa humble the karissa. The maressa julienne the karissa. The aidan is fivefold. The aidan is scraggy. The aidan is light. The aidan is trusting. The aidan julienne the maressa. The karissa noise the maressa. The karissa noise the aidan. The karissa is spikelike. The karissa is light. The karissa humble the aidan. The karissa julienne the maressa. If something julienne the aidan and it noise the aidan then it julienne the karissa. If the karissa julienne the maressa and the maressa humble the aidan then the karissa julienne the aidan. If something julienne the karissa then it is scraggy. The karissa is scraggy.", "logic": "\nNoise(maressa, karissa)\nLight(maressa)\nHumble(maressa, aidan)\nHumble(maressa, karissa)\nJulienne(maressa, karissa)\nFivefold(aidan)\nScraggy(aidan)\nLight(aidan)\nTrusting(aidan)\nJulienne(aidan, maressa)\nNoise(karissa, maressa)\nNoise(karissa, aidan)\nSpikelike(karissa)\nLight(karissa)\nHumble(karissa, aidan)\nJulienne(karissa, maressa)\nforall x (Julienne(x, aidan) and Noise(x, aidan) -> Julienne(x, karissa))\nJulienne(karissa, maressa) and Humble(maressa, aidan) -> Julienne(karissa, aidan)\nforall x (Julienne(x, karissa) -> Scraggy(x))\n\nScraggy(karissa)\n\nJulienne(karissa, maressa) and Humble(maressa, aidan) and Julienne(karissa, maressa) and Humble(maressa, aidan) -> Julienne(karissa, aidan) -> therefore Julienne(karissa, aidan) Julienne(karissa, aidan) and Noise(karissa, aidan) and forall x (Julienne(x, aidan) and Noise(x, aidan) -> Julienne(x, karissa)) -> therefore Julienne(karissa, karissa) Julienne(karissa, karissa) and forall x (Julienne(x, karissa) -> Scraggy(x)) -> therefore Scraggy(karissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The nan harp the christel. The nan is unsolved. The nan whisker the katharine. The nan whisker the christel. The nan shock the christel. The katharine is nuptial. The katharine is sarcoid. The katharine is unsolved. The katharine is spellbound. The katharine shock the nan. The christel harp the nan. The christel harp the katharine. The christel is drinkable. The christel is unsolved. The christel whisker the katharine. The christel shock the nan. If something shock the katharine and it harp the katharine then it shock the christel. If the christel shock the nan and the nan whisker the katharine then the christel shock the katharine. If something shock the christel then it is sarcoid. The christel is not sarcoid.", "logic": "\nHarp(nan, christel)\nUnsolved(nan)\nWhisker(nan, katharine)\nWhisker(nan, christel)\nShock(nan, christel)\nNuptial(katharine)\nSarcoid(katharine)\nUnsolved(katharine)\nSpellbound(katharine)\nShock(katharine, nan)\nHarp(christel, nan)\nHarp(christel, katharine)\nDrinkable(christel)\nUnsolved(christel)\nWhisker(christel, katharine)\nShock(christel, nan)\nforall x (Shock(x, katharine) and Harp(x, katharine) -> Shock(x, christel))\nShock(christel, nan) and Whisker(nan, katharine) -> Shock(christel, katharine)\nforall x (Shock(x, christel) -> Sarcoid(x))\n\nnot Sarcoid(christel)\n\nShock(christel, nan) and Whisker(nan, katharine) and Shock(christel, nan) and Whisker(nan, katharine) -> Shock(christel, katharine) -> therefore Shock(christel, katharine) Shock(christel, katharine) and Harp(christel, katharine) and forall x (Shock(x, katharine) and Harp(x, katharine) -> Shock(x, christel)) -> therefore Shock(christel, christel) Shock(christel, christel) and forall x (Shock(x, christel) -> Sarcoid(x)) -> therefore Sarcoid(christel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The annadiane depose the maurine. The annadiane is ascetical. The annadiane gaol the geneva. The annadiane gaol the maurine. The annadiane censor the maurine. The geneva is nonstick. The geneva is shriveled. The geneva is ascetical. The geneva is coetaneous. The geneva censor the annadiane. The maurine depose the annadiane. The maurine depose the geneva. The maurine is selfsame. The maurine is ascetical. The maurine gaol the geneva. The maurine censor the annadiane. If something censor the geneva and it depose the geneva then it censor the maurine. If the maurine censor the annadiane and the annadiane gaol the geneva then the maurine censor the geneva. If something censor the maurine then it is shriveled. The geneva does not visit the maurine.", "logic": "\nDepose(annadiane, maurine)\nAscetical(annadiane)\nGaol(annadiane, geneva)\nGaol(annadiane, maurine)\nCensor(annadiane, maurine)\nNonstick(geneva)\nShriveled(geneva)\nAscetical(geneva)\nCoetaneous(geneva)\nCensor(geneva, annadiane)\nDepose(maurine, annadiane)\nDepose(maurine, geneva)\nSelfsame(maurine)\nAscetical(maurine)\nGaol(maurine, geneva)\nCensor(maurine, annadiane)\nforall x (Censor(x, geneva) and Depose(x, geneva) -> Censor(x, maurine))\nCensor(maurine, annadiane) and Gaol(annadiane, geneva) -> Censor(maurine, geneva)\nforall x (Censor(x, maurine) -> Shriveled(x))\n\nnot Censor(geneva, maurine)\n\nforall x (Censor(x, geneva) and Depose(x, geneva) -> Censor(x, maurine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The anatollo propound the hans. The anatollo is devilish. The anatollo nerve the hew. The anatollo nerve the hans. The anatollo restore the hans. The hew is bulimic. The hew is cadent. The hew is devilish. The hew is shellproof. The hew restore the anatollo. The hans propound the anatollo. The hans propound the hew. The hans is slavish. The hans is devilish. The hans nerve the hew. The hans restore the anatollo. If something restore the hew and it propound the hew then it restore the hans. If the hans restore the anatollo and the anatollo nerve the hew then the hans restore the hew. If something restore the hans then it is cadent. The anatollo propound the anatollo.", "logic": "\nPropound(anatollo, hans)\nDevilish(anatollo)\nNerve(anatollo, hew)\nNerve(anatollo, hans)\nRestore(anatollo, hans)\nBulimic(hew)\nCadent(hew)\nDevilish(hew)\nShellproof(hew)\nRestore(hew, anatollo)\nPropound(hans, anatollo)\nPropound(hans, hew)\nSlavish(hans)\nDevilish(hans)\nNerve(hans, hew)\nRestore(hans, anatollo)\nforall x (Restore(x, hew) and Propound(x, hew) -> Restore(x, hans))\nRestore(hans, anatollo) and Nerve(anatollo, hew) -> Restore(hans, hew)\nforall x (Restore(x, hans) -> Cadent(x))\n\nPropound(anatollo, anatollo)\n\nPropound(anatollo, anatollo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The shurlocke abacinate the joline. The shurlocke is fore. The shurlocke admit the anatoly. The shurlocke admit the joline. The shurlocke deplumate the joline. The anatoly is topologic. The anatoly is alcoholic. The anatoly is fore. The anatoly is faltering. The anatoly deplumate the shurlocke. The joline abacinate the shurlocke. The joline abacinate the anatoly. The joline is disjunct. The joline is fore. The joline admit the anatoly. The joline deplumate the shurlocke. If something deplumate the anatoly and it abacinate the anatoly then it deplumate the joline. If the joline deplumate the shurlocke and the shurlocke admit the anatoly then the joline deplumate the anatoly. If something deplumate the joline then it is alcoholic. The shurlocke is not topologic.", "logic": "\nAbacinate(shurlocke, joline)\nFore(shurlocke)\nAdmit(shurlocke, anatoly)\nAdmit(shurlocke, joline)\nDeplumate(shurlocke, joline)\nTopologic(anatoly)\nAlcoholic(anatoly)\nFore(anatoly)\nFaltering(anatoly)\nDeplumate(anatoly, shurlocke)\nAbacinate(joline, shurlocke)\nAbacinate(joline, anatoly)\nDisjunct(joline)\nFore(joline)\nAdmit(joline, anatoly)\nDeplumate(joline, shurlocke)\nforall x (Deplumate(x, anatoly) and Abacinate(x, anatoly) -> Deplumate(x, joline))\nDeplumate(joline, shurlocke) and Admit(shurlocke, anatoly) -> Deplumate(joline, anatoly)\nforall x (Deplumate(x, joline) -> Alcoholic(x))\n\nnot Topologic(shurlocke)\n\nnot Topologic(shurlocke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The karlotte direct the marthena. The karlotte is commensal. The karlotte chord the inesita. The karlotte chord the marthena. The karlotte trudge the marthena. The inesita is rhapsodic. The inesita is cutthroat. The inesita is commensal. The inesita is savage. The inesita trudge the karlotte. The marthena direct the karlotte. The marthena direct the inesita. The marthena is swell. The marthena is commensal. The marthena chord the inesita. The marthena trudge the karlotte. If something trudge the inesita and it direct the inesita then it trudge the marthena. If the marthena trudge the karlotte and the karlotte chord the inesita then the marthena trudge the inesita. If something trudge the marthena then it is cutthroat. The inesita trudge the inesita.", "logic": "\nDirect(karlotte, marthena)\nCommensal(karlotte)\nChord(karlotte, inesita)\nChord(karlotte, marthena)\nTrudge(karlotte, marthena)\nRhapsodic(inesita)\nCutthroat(inesita)\nCommensal(inesita)\nSavage(inesita)\nTrudge(inesita, karlotte)\nDirect(marthena, karlotte)\nDirect(marthena, inesita)\nSwell(marthena)\nCommensal(marthena)\nChord(marthena, inesita)\nTrudge(marthena, karlotte)\nforall x (Trudge(x, inesita) and Direct(x, inesita) -> Trudge(x, marthena))\nTrudge(marthena, karlotte) and Chord(karlotte, inesita) -> Trudge(marthena, inesita)\nforall x (Trudge(x, marthena) -> Cutthroat(x))\n\nTrudge(inesita, inesita)\n\nTrudge(inesita, inesita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The evie avianise the pandora. The evie is unended. The evie drive the teddie. The evie drive the pandora. The evie uncurl the pandora. The teddie is unhindered. The teddie is anecdotic. The teddie is unended. The teddie is lamenting. The teddie uncurl the evie. The pandora avianise the evie. The pandora avianise the teddie. The pandora is parentless. The pandora is unended. The pandora drive the teddie. The pandora uncurl the evie. If something uncurl the teddie and it avianise the teddie then it uncurl the pandora. If the pandora uncurl the evie and the evie drive the teddie then the pandora uncurl the teddie. If something uncurl the pandora then it is anecdotic. The teddie does not eat the teddie.", "logic": "\nAvianise(evie, pandora)\nUnended(evie)\nDrive(evie, teddie)\nDrive(evie, pandora)\nUncurl(evie, pandora)\nUnhindered(teddie)\nAnecdotic(teddie)\nUnended(teddie)\nLamenting(teddie)\nUncurl(teddie, evie)\nAvianise(pandora, evie)\nAvianise(pandora, teddie)\nParentless(pandora)\nUnended(pandora)\nDrive(pandora, teddie)\nUncurl(pandora, evie)\nforall x (Uncurl(x, teddie) and Avianise(x, teddie) -> Uncurl(x, pandora))\nUncurl(pandora, evie) and Drive(evie, teddie) -> Uncurl(pandora, teddie)\nforall x (Uncurl(x, pandora) -> Anecdotic(x))\n\nnot Avianise(teddie, teddie)\n\nnot Avianise(teddie, teddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The obadiah nutate the shaun. The obadiah is meddlesome. The obadiah netmail the douggie. The obadiah netmail the shaun. The obadiah hide the shaun. The douggie is ctenoid. The douggie is unhearing. The douggie is meddlesome. The douggie is furlike. The douggie hide the obadiah. The shaun nutate the obadiah. The shaun nutate the douggie. The shaun is recumbent. The shaun is meddlesome. The shaun netmail the douggie. The shaun hide the obadiah. If something hide the douggie and it nutate the douggie then it hide the shaun. If the shaun hide the obadiah and the obadiah netmail the douggie then the shaun hide the douggie. If something hide the shaun then it is unhearing. The shaun is furlike.", "logic": "\nNutate(obadiah, shaun)\nMeddlesome(obadiah)\nNetmail(obadiah, douggie)\nNetmail(obadiah, shaun)\nHide(obadiah, shaun)\nCtenoid(douggie)\nUnhearing(douggie)\nMeddlesome(douggie)\nFurlike(douggie)\nHide(douggie, obadiah)\nNutate(shaun, obadiah)\nNutate(shaun, douggie)\nRecumbent(shaun)\nMeddlesome(shaun)\nNetmail(shaun, douggie)\nHide(shaun, obadiah)\nforall x (Hide(x, douggie) and Nutate(x, douggie) -> Hide(x, shaun))\nHide(shaun, obadiah) and Netmail(obadiah, douggie) -> Hide(shaun, douggie)\nforall x (Hide(x, shaun) -> Unhearing(x))\n\nFurlike(shaun)\n\nFurlike(shaun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The althea liberate the heddie. The althea is overgreedy. The althea flip the nell. The althea flip the heddie. The althea wrap the heddie. The nell is cathodic. The nell is unequal. The nell is overgreedy. The nell is wheezy. The nell wrap the althea. The heddie liberate the althea. The heddie liberate the nell. The heddie is weeping. The heddie is overgreedy. The heddie flip the nell. The heddie wrap the althea. If something wrap the nell and it liberate the nell then it wrap the heddie. If the heddie wrap the althea and the althea flip the nell then the heddie wrap the nell. If something wrap the heddie then it is unequal. The nell does not like the nell.", "logic": "\nLiberate(althea, heddie)\nOvergreedy(althea)\nFlip(althea, nell)\nFlip(althea, heddie)\nWrap(althea, heddie)\nCathodic(nell)\nUnequal(nell)\nOvergreedy(nell)\nWheezy(nell)\nWrap(nell, althea)\nLiberate(heddie, althea)\nLiberate(heddie, nell)\nWeeping(heddie)\nOvergreedy(heddie)\nFlip(heddie, nell)\nWrap(heddie, althea)\nforall x (Wrap(x, nell) and Liberate(x, nell) -> Wrap(x, heddie))\nWrap(heddie, althea) and Flip(althea, nell) -> Wrap(heddie, nell)\nforall x (Wrap(x, heddie) -> Unequal(x))\n\nnot Flip(nell, nell)\n\nnot Flip(nell, nell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The sebastien pervert the joann. The sebastien is coolheaded. The sebastien luxuriate the clemmie. The sebastien luxuriate the joann. The sebastien clump the joann. The clemmie is wimpy. The clemmie is techy. The clemmie is coolheaded. The clemmie is heedful. The clemmie clump the sebastien. The joann pervert the sebastien. The joann pervert the clemmie. The joann is funny. The joann is coolheaded. The joann luxuriate the clemmie. The joann clump the sebastien. If something clump the clemmie and it pervert the clemmie then it clump the joann. If the joann clump the sebastien and the sebastien luxuriate the clemmie then the joann clump the clemmie. If something clump the joann then it is techy. The sebastien luxuriate the sebastien.", "logic": "\nPervert(sebastien, joann)\nCoolheaded(sebastien)\nLuxuriate(sebastien, clemmie)\nLuxuriate(sebastien, joann)\nClump(sebastien, joann)\nWimpy(clemmie)\nTechy(clemmie)\nCoolheaded(clemmie)\nHeedful(clemmie)\nClump(clemmie, sebastien)\nPervert(joann, sebastien)\nPervert(joann, clemmie)\nFunny(joann)\nCoolheaded(joann)\nLuxuriate(joann, clemmie)\nClump(joann, sebastien)\nforall x (Clump(x, clemmie) and Pervert(x, clemmie) -> Clump(x, joann))\nClump(joann, sebastien) and Luxuriate(sebastien, clemmie) -> Clump(joann, clemmie)\nforall x (Clump(x, joann) -> Techy(x))\n\nLuxuriate(sebastien, sebastien)\n\nLuxuriate(sebastien, sebastien) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The lanie is facile. The lanie relearn the rita. The lanie enfilade the kate. The lanie enfilade the rita. The kate fossilise the rita. The kate is not judicial. The kate is rhombic. The kate relearn the lanie. The kate relearn the rita. The kate enfilade the rita. The rita fossilise the kate. The rita enfilade the kate. If something enfilade the lanie then the lanie relearn the kate. If something fossilise the rita then it is endogenous. If something relearn the lanie then the lanie is judicial. If something fossilise the rita then the rita is not rhombic. If something relearn the kate then the kate does not need the lanie. If something is facile and it does not need the kate then the kate does not like the lanie. If the rita is judicial and the rita relearn the kate then the rita does not eat the lanie. If something enfilade the kate and the kate fossilise the rita then it enfilade the lanie. The lanie enfilade the rita.", "logic": "\nFacile(lanie)\nRelearn(lanie, rita)\nEnfilade(lanie, kate)\nEnfilade(lanie, rita)\nFossilise(kate, rita)\nnot Judicial(kate)\nRhombic(kate)\nRelearn(kate, lanie)\nRelearn(kate, rita)\nEnfilade(kate, rita)\nFossilise(rita, kate)\nEnfilade(rita, kate)\nforall x (Enfilade(x, lanie) -> Relearn(lanie, kate))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, rita) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Relearn(x, lanie) -> Judicial(lanie))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, rita) -> not Rhombic(rita))\nforall x (Relearn(x, kate) -> not Enfilade(kate, lanie))\nforall x (Facile(x) and not Enfilade(x, kate) -> not Relearn(kate, lanie))\nJudicial(rita) and Relearn(rita, kate) -> not Fossilise(rita, lanie)\nforall x (Enfilade(x, kate) and Fossilise(kate, rita) -> Enfilade(x, lanie))\n\nEnfilade(lanie, rita)\n\ntherefore Enfilade(lanie, rita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The camala is aqueous. The camala understate the ichabod. The camala neaten the sara. The camala neaten the ichabod. The sara animate the ichabod. The sara is not mournful. The sara is argentic. The sara understate the camala. The sara understate the ichabod. The sara neaten the ichabod. The ichabod animate the sara. The ichabod neaten the sara. If something neaten the camala then the camala understate the sara. If something animate the ichabod then it is jiggered. If something understate the camala then the camala is mournful. If something animate the ichabod then the ichabod is not argentic. If something understate the sara then the sara does not need the camala. If something is aqueous and it does not need the sara then the sara does not like the camala. If the ichabod is mournful and the ichabod understate the sara then the ichabod does not eat the camala. If something neaten the sara and the sara animate the ichabod then it neaten the camala. The sara does not like the ichabod.", "logic": "\nAqueous(camala)\nUnderstate(camala, ichabod)\nNeaten(camala, sara)\nNeaten(camala, ichabod)\nAnimate(sara, ichabod)\nnot Mournful(sara)\nArgentic(sara)\nUnderstate(sara, camala)\nUnderstate(sara, ichabod)\nNeaten(sara, ichabod)\nAnimate(ichabod, sara)\nNeaten(ichabod, sara)\nforall x (Neaten(x, camala) -> Understate(camala, sara))\nforall x (Animate(x, ichabod) -> Jiggered(x))\nforall x (Understate(x, camala) -> Mournful(camala))\nforall x (Animate(x, ichabod) -> not Argentic(ichabod))\nforall x (Understate(x, sara) -> not Neaten(sara, camala))\nforall x (Aqueous(x) and not Neaten(x, sara) -> not Understate(sara, camala))\nMournful(ichabod) and Understate(ichabod, sara) -> not Animate(ichabod, camala)\nforall x (Neaten(x, sara) and Animate(sara, ichabod) -> Neaten(x, camala))\n\nnot Understate(sara, ichabod)\n\ntherefore Understate(sara, ichabod)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The tresa is epic. The tresa strap the nichole. The tresa suppress the nessie. The tresa suppress the nichole. The nessie better the nichole. The nessie is not shocking. The nessie is aortal. The nessie strap the tresa. The nessie strap the nichole. The nessie suppress the nichole. The nichole better the nessie. The nichole suppress the nessie. If something suppress the tresa then the tresa strap the nessie. If something better the nichole then it is crooked. If something strap the tresa then the tresa is shocking. If something better the nichole then the nichole is not aortal. If something strap the nessie then the nessie does not need the tresa. If something is epic and it does not need the nessie then the nessie does not like the tresa. If the nichole is shocking and the nichole strap the nessie then the nichole does not eat the tresa. If something suppress the nessie and the nessie better the nichole then it suppress the tresa. The tresa suppress the tresa.", "logic": "\nEpic(tresa)\nStrap(tresa, nichole)\nSuppress(tresa, nessie)\nSuppress(tresa, nichole)\nBetter(nessie, nichole)\nnot Shocking(nessie)\nAortal(nessie)\nStrap(nessie, tresa)\nStrap(nessie, nichole)\nSuppress(nessie, nichole)\nBetter(nichole, nessie)\nSuppress(nichole, nessie)\nforall x (Suppress(x, tresa) -> Strap(tresa, nessie))\nforall x (Better(x, nichole) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Strap(x, tresa) -> Shocking(tresa))\nforall x (Better(x, nichole) -> not Aortal(nichole))\nforall x (Strap(x, nessie) -> not Suppress(nessie, tresa))\nforall x (Epic(x) and not Suppress(x, nessie) -> not Strap(nessie, tresa))\nShocking(nichole) and Strap(nichole, nessie) -> not Better(nichole, tresa)\nforall x (Suppress(x, nessie) and Better(nessie, nichole) -> Suppress(x, tresa))\n\nSuppress(tresa, tresa)\n\nSuppress(tresa, nessie) and Better(nessie, nichole) and forall x (Suppress(x, nessie) and Better(nessie, nichole) -> Suppress(x, tresa)) -> therefore Suppress(tresa, tresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The viola is posterior. The viola refract the carlynn. The viola castigate the jacki. The viola castigate the carlynn. The jacki goad the carlynn. The jacki is not allover. The jacki is flyspeck. The jacki refract the viola. The jacki refract the carlynn. The jacki castigate the carlynn. The carlynn goad the jacki. The carlynn castigate the jacki. If something castigate the viola then the viola refract the jacki. If something goad the carlynn then it is clubfooted. If something refract the viola then the viola is allover. If something goad the carlynn then the carlynn is not flyspeck. If something refract the jacki then the jacki does not need the viola. If something is posterior and it does not need the jacki then the jacki does not like the viola. If the carlynn is allover and the carlynn refract the jacki then the carlynn does not eat the viola. If something castigate the jacki and the jacki goad the carlynn then it castigate the viola. The viola does not need the viola.", "logic": "\nPosterior(viola)\nRefract(viola, carlynn)\nCastigate(viola, jacki)\nCastigate(viola, carlynn)\nGoad(jacki, carlynn)\nnot Allover(jacki)\nFlyspeck(jacki)\nRefract(jacki, viola)\nRefract(jacki, carlynn)\nCastigate(jacki, carlynn)\nGoad(carlynn, jacki)\nCastigate(carlynn, jacki)\nforall x (Castigate(x, viola) -> Refract(viola, jacki))\nforall x (Goad(x, carlynn) -> Clubfooted(x))\nforall x (Refract(x, viola) -> Allover(viola))\nforall x (Goad(x, carlynn) -> not Flyspeck(carlynn))\nforall x (Refract(x, jacki) -> not Castigate(jacki, viola))\nforall x (Posterior(x) and not Castigate(x, jacki) -> not Refract(jacki, viola))\nAllover(carlynn) and Refract(carlynn, jacki) -> not Goad(carlynn, viola)\nforall x (Castigate(x, jacki) and Goad(jacki, carlynn) -> Castigate(x, viola))\n\nnot Castigate(viola, viola)\n\nCastigate(viola, jacki) and Goad(jacki, carlynn) and forall x (Castigate(x, jacki) and Goad(jacki, carlynn) -> Castigate(x, viola)) -> therefore Castigate(viola, viola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The effie is falsetto. The effie skydive the feliza. The effie accentuate the bethena. The effie accentuate the feliza. The bethena dope the feliza. The bethena is not cometic. The bethena is accusing. The bethena skydive the effie. The bethena skydive the feliza. The bethena accentuate the feliza. The feliza dope the bethena. The feliza accentuate the bethena. If something accentuate the effie then the effie skydive the bethena. If something dope the feliza then it is immediate. If something skydive the effie then the effie is cometic. If something dope the feliza then the feliza is not accusing. If something skydive the bethena then the bethena does not need the effie. If something is falsetto and it does not need the bethena then the bethena does not like the effie. If the feliza is cometic and the feliza skydive the bethena then the feliza does not eat the effie. If something accentuate the bethena and the bethena dope the feliza then it accentuate the effie. The effie skydive the bethena.", "logic": "\nFalsetto(effie)\nSkydive(effie, feliza)\nAccentuate(effie, bethena)\nAccentuate(effie, feliza)\nDope(bethena, feliza)\nnot Cometic(bethena)\nAccusing(bethena)\nSkydive(bethena, effie)\nSkydive(bethena, feliza)\nAccentuate(bethena, feliza)\nDope(feliza, bethena)\nAccentuate(feliza, bethena)\nforall x (Accentuate(x, effie) -> Skydive(effie, bethena))\nforall x (Dope(x, feliza) -> Immediate(x))\nforall x (Skydive(x, effie) -> Cometic(effie))\nforall x (Dope(x, feliza) -> not Accusing(feliza))\nforall x (Skydive(x, bethena) -> not Accentuate(bethena, effie))\nforall x (Falsetto(x) and not Accentuate(x, bethena) -> not Skydive(bethena, effie))\nCometic(feliza) and Skydive(feliza, bethena) -> not Dope(feliza, effie)\nforall x (Accentuate(x, bethena) and Dope(bethena, feliza) -> Accentuate(x, effie))\n\nSkydive(effie, bethena)\n\nAccentuate(feliza, bethena) and Dope(bethena, feliza) and forall x (Accentuate(x, bethena) and Dope(bethena, feliza) -> Accentuate(x, effie)) -> therefore Accentuate(feliza, effie) Accentuate(feliza, effie) and forall x (Accentuate(x, effie) -> Skydive(effie, bethena)) -> therefore Skydive(effie, bethena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The olag is diastolic. The olag alkalinise the lockwood. The olag suppose the anissa. The olag suppose the lockwood. The anissa brachiate the lockwood. The anissa is not unspoiled. The anissa is witty. The anissa alkalinise the olag. The anissa alkalinise the lockwood. The anissa suppose the lockwood. The lockwood brachiate the anissa. The lockwood suppose the anissa. If something suppose the olag then the olag alkalinise the anissa. If something brachiate the lockwood then it is corrosive. If something alkalinise the olag then the olag is unspoiled. If something brachiate the lockwood then the lockwood is not witty. If something alkalinise the anissa then the anissa does not need the olag. If something is diastolic and it does not need the anissa then the anissa does not like the olag. If the lockwood is unspoiled and the lockwood alkalinise the anissa then the lockwood does not eat the olag. If something suppose the anissa and the anissa brachiate the lockwood then it suppose the olag. The olag does not like the anissa.", "logic": "\nDiastolic(olag)\nAlkalinise(olag, lockwood)\nSuppose(olag, anissa)\nSuppose(olag, lockwood)\nBrachiate(anissa, lockwood)\nnot Unspoiled(anissa)\nWitty(anissa)\nAlkalinise(anissa, olag)\nAlkalinise(anissa, lockwood)\nSuppose(anissa, lockwood)\nBrachiate(lockwood, anissa)\nSuppose(lockwood, anissa)\nforall x (Suppose(x, olag) -> Alkalinise(olag, anissa))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, lockwood) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, olag) -> Unspoiled(olag))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, lockwood) -> not Witty(lockwood))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, anissa) -> not Suppose(anissa, olag))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and not Suppose(x, anissa) -> not Alkalinise(anissa, olag))\nUnspoiled(lockwood) and Alkalinise(lockwood, anissa) -> not Brachiate(lockwood, olag)\nforall x (Suppose(x, anissa) and Brachiate(anissa, lockwood) -> Suppose(x, olag))\n\nnot Alkalinise(olag, anissa)\n\nSuppose(lockwood, anissa) and Brachiate(anissa, lockwood) and forall x (Suppose(x, anissa) and Brachiate(anissa, lockwood) -> Suppose(x, olag)) -> therefore Suppose(lockwood, olag) Suppose(lockwood, olag) and forall x (Suppose(x, olag) -> Alkalinise(olag, anissa)) -> therefore Alkalinise(olag, anissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The kathe is rested. The kathe inspissate the cameo. The kathe skedaddle the arianne. The kathe skedaddle the cameo. The arianne tack the cameo. The arianne is not converse. The arianne is correlated. The arianne inspissate the kathe. The arianne inspissate the cameo. The arianne skedaddle the cameo. The cameo tack the arianne. The cameo skedaddle the arianne. If something skedaddle the kathe then the kathe inspissate the arianne. If something tack the cameo then it is comose. If something inspissate the kathe then the kathe is converse. If something tack the cameo then the cameo is not correlated. If something inspissate the arianne then the arianne does not need the kathe. If something is rested and it does not need the arianne then the arianne does not like the kathe. If the cameo is converse and the cameo inspissate the arianne then the cameo does not eat the kathe. If something skedaddle the arianne and the arianne tack the cameo then it skedaddle the kathe. The arianne does not need the kathe.", "logic": "\nRested(kathe)\nInspissate(kathe, cameo)\nSkedaddle(kathe, arianne)\nSkedaddle(kathe, cameo)\nTack(arianne, cameo)\nnot Converse(arianne)\nCorrelated(arianne)\nInspissate(arianne, kathe)\nInspissate(arianne, cameo)\nSkedaddle(arianne, cameo)\nTack(cameo, arianne)\nSkedaddle(cameo, arianne)\nforall x (Skedaddle(x, kathe) -> Inspissate(kathe, arianne))\nforall x (Tack(x, cameo) -> Comose(x))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, kathe) -> Converse(kathe))\nforall x (Tack(x, cameo) -> not Correlated(cameo))\nforall x (Inspissate(x, arianne) -> not Skedaddle(arianne, kathe))\nforall x (Rested(x) and not Skedaddle(x, arianne) -> not Inspissate(arianne, kathe))\nConverse(cameo) and Inspissate(cameo, arianne) -> not Tack(cameo, kathe)\nforall x (Skedaddle(x, arianne) and Tack(arianne, cameo) -> Skedaddle(x, kathe))\n\nnot Skedaddle(arianne, kathe)\n\nSkedaddle(cameo, arianne) and Tack(arianne, cameo) and forall x (Skedaddle(x, arianne) and Tack(arianne, cameo) -> Skedaddle(x, kathe)) -> therefore Skedaddle(cameo, kathe) Skedaddle(cameo, kathe) and forall x (Skedaddle(x, kathe) -> Inspissate(kathe, arianne)) -> therefore Inspissate(kathe, arianne) Inspissate(kathe, arianne) and forall x (Inspissate(x, arianne) -> not Skedaddle(arianne, kathe)) -> therefore not Skedaddle(arianne, kathe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The jaclyn is spiral. The jaclyn stripe the maddi. The jaclyn chuff the niles. The jaclyn chuff the maddi. The niles defrock the maddi. The niles is not cedarn. The niles is runty. The niles stripe the jaclyn. The niles stripe the maddi. The niles chuff the maddi. The maddi defrock the niles. The maddi chuff the niles. If something chuff the jaclyn then the jaclyn stripe the niles. If something defrock the maddi then it is orgiastic. If something stripe the jaclyn then the jaclyn is cedarn. If something defrock the maddi then the maddi is not runty. If something stripe the niles then the niles does not need the jaclyn. If something is spiral and it does not need the niles then the niles does not like the jaclyn. If the maddi is cedarn and the maddi stripe the niles then the maddi does not eat the jaclyn. If something chuff the niles and the niles defrock the maddi then it chuff the jaclyn. The niles chuff the jaclyn.", "logic": "\nSpiral(jaclyn)\nStripe(jaclyn, maddi)\nChuff(jaclyn, niles)\nChuff(jaclyn, maddi)\nDefrock(niles, maddi)\nnot Cedarn(niles)\nRunty(niles)\nStripe(niles, jaclyn)\nStripe(niles, maddi)\nChuff(niles, maddi)\nDefrock(maddi, niles)\nChuff(maddi, niles)\nforall x (Chuff(x, jaclyn) -> Stripe(jaclyn, niles))\nforall x (Defrock(x, maddi) -> Orgiastic(x))\nforall x (Stripe(x, jaclyn) -> Cedarn(jaclyn))\nforall x (Defrock(x, maddi) -> not Runty(maddi))\nforall x (Stripe(x, niles) -> not Chuff(niles, jaclyn))\nforall x (Spiral(x) and not Chuff(x, niles) -> not Stripe(niles, jaclyn))\nCedarn(maddi) and Stripe(maddi, niles) -> not Defrock(maddi, jaclyn)\nforall x (Chuff(x, niles) and Defrock(niles, maddi) -> Chuff(x, jaclyn))\n\nChuff(niles, jaclyn)\n\nChuff(maddi, niles) and Defrock(niles, maddi) and forall x (Chuff(x, niles) and Defrock(niles, maddi) -> Chuff(x, jaclyn)) -> therefore Chuff(maddi, jaclyn) Chuff(maddi, jaclyn) and forall x (Chuff(x, jaclyn) -> Stripe(jaclyn, niles)) -> therefore Stripe(jaclyn, niles) Stripe(jaclyn, niles) and forall x (Stripe(x, niles) -> not Chuff(niles, jaclyn)) -> therefore not Chuff(niles, jaclyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The edin is coated. The edin strip the tawsha. The edin muddy the riane. The edin muddy the tawsha. The riane revert the tawsha. The riane is not rewarding. The riane is anabiotic. The riane strip the edin. The riane strip the tawsha. The riane muddy the tawsha. The tawsha revert the riane. The tawsha muddy the riane. If something muddy the edin then the edin strip the riane. If something revert the tawsha then it is decadent. If something strip the edin then the edin is rewarding. If something revert the tawsha then the tawsha is not anabiotic. If something strip the riane then the riane does not need the edin. If something is coated and it does not need the riane then the riane does not like the edin. If the tawsha is rewarding and the tawsha strip the riane then the tawsha does not eat the edin. If something muddy the riane and the riane revert the tawsha then it muddy the edin. The edin is not decadent.", "logic": "\nCoated(edin)\nStrip(edin, tawsha)\nMuddy(edin, riane)\nMuddy(edin, tawsha)\nRevert(riane, tawsha)\nnot Rewarding(riane)\nAnabiotic(riane)\nStrip(riane, edin)\nStrip(riane, tawsha)\nMuddy(riane, tawsha)\nRevert(tawsha, riane)\nMuddy(tawsha, riane)\nforall x (Muddy(x, edin) -> Strip(edin, riane))\nforall x (Revert(x, tawsha) -> Decadent(x))\nforall x (Strip(x, edin) -> Rewarding(edin))\nforall x (Revert(x, tawsha) -> not Anabiotic(tawsha))\nforall x (Strip(x, riane) -> not Muddy(riane, edin))\nforall x (Coated(x) and not Muddy(x, riane) -> not Strip(riane, edin))\nRewarding(tawsha) and Strip(tawsha, riane) -> not Revert(tawsha, edin)\nforall x (Muddy(x, riane) and Revert(riane, tawsha) -> Muddy(x, edin))\n\nnot Decadent(edin)\n\nforall x (Revert(x, tawsha) -> Decadent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The cherey is undefiled. The cherey fizzle the mauritz. The cherey saute the chickie. The cherey saute the mauritz. The chickie nauseate the mauritz. The chickie is not loose. The chickie is biomedical. The chickie fizzle the cherey. The chickie fizzle the mauritz. The chickie saute the mauritz. The mauritz nauseate the chickie. The mauritz saute the chickie. If something saute the cherey then the cherey fizzle the chickie. If something nauseate the mauritz then it is frosty. If something fizzle the cherey then the cherey is loose. If something nauseate the mauritz then the mauritz is not biomedical. If something fizzle the chickie then the chickie does not need the cherey. If something is undefiled and it does not need the chickie then the chickie does not like the cherey. If the mauritz is loose and the mauritz fizzle the chickie then the mauritz does not eat the cherey. If something saute the chickie and the chickie nauseate the mauritz then it saute the cherey. The mauritz is frosty.", "logic": "\nUndefiled(cherey)\nFizzle(cherey, mauritz)\nSaute(cherey, chickie)\nSaute(cherey, mauritz)\nNauseate(chickie, mauritz)\nnot Loose(chickie)\nBiomedical(chickie)\nFizzle(chickie, cherey)\nFizzle(chickie, mauritz)\nSaute(chickie, mauritz)\nNauseate(mauritz, chickie)\nSaute(mauritz, chickie)\nforall x (Saute(x, cherey) -> Fizzle(cherey, chickie))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, mauritz) -> Frosty(x))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, cherey) -> Loose(cherey))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, mauritz) -> not Biomedical(mauritz))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, chickie) -> not Saute(chickie, cherey))\nforall x (Undefiled(x) and not Saute(x, chickie) -> not Fizzle(chickie, cherey))\nLoose(mauritz) and Fizzle(mauritz, chickie) -> not Nauseate(mauritz, cherey)\nforall x (Saute(x, chickie) and Nauseate(chickie, mauritz) -> Saute(x, cherey))\n\nFrosty(mauritz)\n\nforall x (Nauseate(x, mauritz) -> Frosty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The jennings is phobic. The jennings divert the elyssa. The jennings legitimise the wilmar. The jennings legitimise the elyssa. The wilmar create the elyssa. The wilmar is not labiate. The wilmar is laotian. The wilmar divert the jennings. The wilmar divert the elyssa. The wilmar legitimise the elyssa. The elyssa create the wilmar. The elyssa legitimise the wilmar. If something legitimise the jennings then the jennings divert the wilmar. If something create the elyssa then it is babyish. If something divert the jennings then the jennings is labiate. If something create the elyssa then the elyssa is not laotian. If something divert the wilmar then the wilmar does not need the jennings. If something is phobic and it does not need the wilmar then the wilmar does not like the jennings. If the elyssa is labiate and the elyssa divert the wilmar then the elyssa does not eat the jennings. If something legitimise the wilmar and the wilmar create the elyssa then it legitimise the jennings. The jennings does not like the jennings.", "logic": "\nPhobic(jennings)\nDivert(jennings, elyssa)\nLegitimise(jennings, wilmar)\nLegitimise(jennings, elyssa)\nCreate(wilmar, elyssa)\nnot Labiate(wilmar)\nLaotian(wilmar)\nDivert(wilmar, jennings)\nDivert(wilmar, elyssa)\nLegitimise(wilmar, elyssa)\nCreate(elyssa, wilmar)\nLegitimise(elyssa, wilmar)\nforall x (Legitimise(x, jennings) -> Divert(jennings, wilmar))\nforall x (Create(x, elyssa) -> Babyish(x))\nforall x (Divert(x, jennings) -> Labiate(jennings))\nforall x (Create(x, elyssa) -> not Laotian(elyssa))\nforall x (Divert(x, wilmar) -> not Legitimise(wilmar, jennings))\nforall x (Phobic(x) and not Legitimise(x, wilmar) -> not Divert(wilmar, jennings))\nLabiate(elyssa) and Divert(elyssa, wilmar) -> not Create(elyssa, jennings)\nforall x (Legitimise(x, wilmar) and Create(wilmar, elyssa) -> Legitimise(x, jennings))\n\nnot Divert(jennings, jennings)\n\nnot Divert(jennings, jennings) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The clary is autacoidal. The clary vaporize the rafe. The clary handwash the matty. The clary handwash the rafe. The matty grave the rafe. The matty is not alloyed. The matty is rustic. The matty vaporize the clary. The matty vaporize the rafe. The matty handwash the rafe. The rafe grave the matty. The rafe handwash the matty. If something handwash the clary then the clary vaporize the matty. If something grave the rafe then it is profligate. If something vaporize the clary then the clary is alloyed. If something grave the rafe then the rafe is not rustic. If something vaporize the matty then the matty does not need the clary. If something is autacoidal and it does not need the matty then the matty does not like the clary. If the rafe is alloyed and the rafe vaporize the matty then the rafe does not eat the clary. If something handwash the matty and the matty grave the rafe then it handwash the clary. The matty is blue.", "logic": "\nAutacoidal(clary)\nVaporize(clary, rafe)\nHandwash(clary, matty)\nHandwash(clary, rafe)\nGrave(matty, rafe)\nnot Alloyed(matty)\nRustic(matty)\nVaporize(matty, clary)\nVaporize(matty, rafe)\nHandwash(matty, rafe)\nGrave(rafe, matty)\nHandwash(rafe, matty)\nforall x (Handwash(x, clary) -> Vaporize(clary, matty))\nforall x (Grave(x, rafe) -> Profligate(x))\nforall x (Vaporize(x, clary) -> Alloyed(clary))\nforall x (Grave(x, rafe) -> not Rustic(rafe))\nforall x (Vaporize(x, matty) -> not Handwash(matty, clary))\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and not Handwash(x, matty) -> not Vaporize(matty, clary))\nAlloyed(rafe) and Vaporize(rafe, matty) -> not Grave(rafe, clary)\nforall x (Handwash(x, matty) and Grave(matty, rafe) -> Handwash(x, clary))\n\nBlue(matty)\n\nBlue(matty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The bradly is alchemic. The bradly culminate the camile. The bradly anoint the riccardo. The bradly anoint the camile. The riccardo repeal the camile. The riccardo is not headlong. The riccardo is atomistic. The riccardo culminate the bradly. The riccardo culminate the camile. The riccardo anoint the camile. The camile repeal the riccardo. The camile anoint the riccardo. If something anoint the bradly then the bradly culminate the riccardo. If something repeal the camile then it is hidrotic. If something culminate the bradly then the bradly is headlong. If something repeal the camile then the camile is not atomistic. If something culminate the riccardo then the riccardo does not need the bradly. If something is alchemic and it does not need the riccardo then the riccardo does not like the bradly. If the camile is headlong and the camile culminate the riccardo then the camile does not eat the bradly. If something anoint the riccardo and the riccardo repeal the camile then it anoint the bradly. The camile does not like the riccardo.", "logic": "\nAlchemic(bradly)\nCulminate(bradly, camile)\nAnoint(bradly, riccardo)\nAnoint(bradly, camile)\nRepeal(riccardo, camile)\nnot Headlong(riccardo)\nAtomistic(riccardo)\nCulminate(riccardo, bradly)\nCulminate(riccardo, camile)\nAnoint(riccardo, camile)\nRepeal(camile, riccardo)\nAnoint(camile, riccardo)\nforall x (Anoint(x, bradly) -> Culminate(bradly, riccardo))\nforall x (Repeal(x, camile) -> Hidrotic(x))\nforall x (Culminate(x, bradly) -> Headlong(bradly))\nforall x (Repeal(x, camile) -> not Atomistic(camile))\nforall x (Culminate(x, riccardo) -> not Anoint(riccardo, bradly))\nforall x (Alchemic(x) and not Anoint(x, riccardo) -> not Culminate(riccardo, bradly))\nHeadlong(camile) and Culminate(camile, riccardo) -> not Repeal(camile, bradly)\nforall x (Anoint(x, riccardo) and Repeal(riccardo, camile) -> Anoint(x, bradly))\n\nnot Culminate(camile, riccardo)\n\nnot Culminate(camile, riccardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The hattie is philistine. The hattie mitigate the jabez. The hattie instil the sergeant. The hattie instil the jabez. The sergeant beckon the jabez. The sergeant is not torturous. The sergeant is lancelike. The sergeant mitigate the hattie. The sergeant mitigate the jabez. The sergeant instil the jabez. The jabez beckon the sergeant. The jabez instil the sergeant. If something instil the hattie then the hattie mitigate the sergeant. If something beckon the jabez then it is pompous. If something mitigate the hattie then the hattie is torturous. If something beckon the jabez then the jabez is not lancelike. If something mitigate the sergeant then the sergeant does not need the hattie. If something is philistine and it does not need the sergeant then the sergeant does not like the hattie. If the jabez is torturous and the jabez mitigate the sergeant then the jabez does not eat the hattie. If something instil the sergeant and the sergeant beckon the jabez then it instil the hattie. The jabez is blue.", "logic": "\nPhilistine(hattie)\nMitigate(hattie, jabez)\nInstil(hattie, sergeant)\nInstil(hattie, jabez)\nBeckon(sergeant, jabez)\nnot Torturous(sergeant)\nLancelike(sergeant)\nMitigate(sergeant, hattie)\nMitigate(sergeant, jabez)\nInstil(sergeant, jabez)\nBeckon(jabez, sergeant)\nInstil(jabez, sergeant)\nforall x (Instil(x, hattie) -> Mitigate(hattie, sergeant))\nforall x (Beckon(x, jabez) -> Pompous(x))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, hattie) -> Torturous(hattie))\nforall x (Beckon(x, jabez) -> not Lancelike(jabez))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, sergeant) -> not Instil(sergeant, hattie))\nforall x (Philistine(x) and not Instil(x, sergeant) -> not Mitigate(sergeant, hattie))\nTorturous(jabez) and Mitigate(jabez, sergeant) -> not Beckon(jabez, hattie)\nforall x (Instil(x, sergeant) and Beckon(sergeant, jabez) -> Instil(x, hattie))\n\nBlue(jabez)\n\nBlue(jabez) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The cherilynn is cumulative. The cherilynn conquer the rubin. The cherilynn copyread the udell. The cherilynn copyread the rubin. The udell salute the rubin. The udell is not hotheaded. The udell is liberal. The udell conquer the cherilynn. The udell conquer the rubin. The udell copyread the rubin. The rubin salute the udell. The rubin copyread the udell. If something copyread the cherilynn then the cherilynn conquer the udell. If something salute the rubin then it is christlike. If something conquer the cherilynn then the cherilynn is hotheaded. If something salute the rubin then the rubin is not liberal. If something conquer the udell then the udell does not need the cherilynn. If something is cumulative and it does not need the udell then the udell does not like the cherilynn. If the rubin is hotheaded and the rubin conquer the udell then the rubin does not eat the cherilynn. If something copyread the udell and the udell salute the rubin then it copyread the cherilynn. The udell does not eat the cherilynn.", "logic": "\nCumulative(cherilynn)\nConquer(cherilynn, rubin)\nCopyread(cherilynn, udell)\nCopyread(cherilynn, rubin)\nSalute(udell, rubin)\nnot Hotheaded(udell)\nLiberal(udell)\nConquer(udell, cherilynn)\nConquer(udell, rubin)\nCopyread(udell, rubin)\nSalute(rubin, udell)\nCopyread(rubin, udell)\nforall x (Copyread(x, cherilynn) -> Conquer(cherilynn, udell))\nforall x (Salute(x, rubin) -> Christlike(x))\nforall x (Conquer(x, cherilynn) -> Hotheaded(cherilynn))\nforall x (Salute(x, rubin) -> not Liberal(rubin))\nforall x (Conquer(x, udell) -> not Copyread(udell, cherilynn))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) and not Copyread(x, udell) -> not Conquer(udell, cherilynn))\nHotheaded(rubin) and Conquer(rubin, udell) -> not Salute(rubin, cherilynn)\nforall x (Copyread(x, udell) and Salute(udell, rubin) -> Copyread(x, cherilynn))\n\nnot Salute(udell, cherilynn)\n\nnot Salute(udell, cherilynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The merralee is dogmatical. The merralee muff the laurena. The merralee rededicate the sal. The merralee rededicate the laurena. The sal sorb the laurena. The sal is not nonionic. The sal is tipped. The sal muff the merralee. The sal muff the laurena. The sal rededicate the laurena. The laurena sorb the sal. The laurena rededicate the sal. If something rededicate the merralee then the merralee muff the sal. If something sorb the laurena then it is neoplastic. If something muff the merralee then the merralee is nonionic. If something sorb the laurena then the laurena is not tipped. If something muff the sal then the sal does not need the merralee. If something is dogmatical and it does not need the sal then the sal does not like the merralee. If the laurena is nonionic and the laurena muff the sal then the laurena does not eat the merralee. If something rededicate the sal and the sal sorb the laurena then it rededicate the merralee. The merralee is blue.", "logic": "\nDogmatical(merralee)\nMuff(merralee, laurena)\nRededicate(merralee, sal)\nRededicate(merralee, laurena)\nSorb(sal, laurena)\nnot Nonionic(sal)\nTipped(sal)\nMuff(sal, merralee)\nMuff(sal, laurena)\nRededicate(sal, laurena)\nSorb(laurena, sal)\nRededicate(laurena, sal)\nforall x (Rededicate(x, merralee) -> Muff(merralee, sal))\nforall x (Sorb(x, laurena) -> Neoplastic(x))\nforall x (Muff(x, merralee) -> Nonionic(merralee))\nforall x (Sorb(x, laurena) -> not Tipped(laurena))\nforall x (Muff(x, sal) -> not Rededicate(sal, merralee))\nforall x (Dogmatical(x) and not Rededicate(x, sal) -> not Muff(sal, merralee))\nNonionic(laurena) and Muff(laurena, sal) -> not Sorb(laurena, merralee)\nforall x (Rededicate(x, sal) and Sorb(sal, laurena) -> Rededicate(x, merralee))\n\nBlue(merralee)\n\nBlue(merralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1474"} {"premises": "The juline is taloned. If the juline is bilgy then the juline is gaseous. Red people are bilgy. Round people are diminished. The juline is taloned.", "logic": "\nTaloned(juline)\nBilgy(juline) -> Gaseous(juline)\nforall x (Taloned(x) -> Bilgy(x))\nforall x (Bilgy(x) -> Diminished(x))\n\nTaloned(juline)\n\ntherefore Taloned(juline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The joel is fifteen. If the joel is unvaned then the joel is upraised. Red people are unvaned. Round people are pacific. The joel is not fifteen.", "logic": "\nFifteen(joel)\nUnvaned(joel) -> Upraised(joel)\nforall x (Fifteen(x) -> Unvaned(x))\nforall x (Unvaned(x) -> Pacific(x))\n\nnot Fifteen(joel)\n\ntherefore Fifteen(joel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The torr is emulous. If the torr is undue then the torr is cathedral. Red people are undue. Round people are kantian. The torr is undue.", "logic": "\nEmulous(torr)\nUndue(torr) -> Cathedral(torr)\nforall x (Emulous(x) -> Undue(x))\nforall x (Undue(x) -> Kantian(x))\n\nUndue(torr)\n\nEmulous(torr) and forall x (Emulous(x) -> Undue(x)) -> therefore Undue(torr)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The valerie is sorted. If the valerie is weepy then the valerie is potent. Red people are weepy. Round people are defamatory. The valerie is not weepy.", "logic": "\nSorted(valerie)\nWeepy(valerie) -> Potent(valerie)\nforall x (Sorted(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Defamatory(x))\n\nnot Weepy(valerie)\n\nSorted(valerie) and forall x (Sorted(x) -> Weepy(x)) -> therefore Weepy(valerie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The jinny is adherent. If the jinny is muscovite then the jinny is fatherly. Red people are muscovite. Round people are misrelated. The jinny is misrelated.", "logic": "\nAdherent(jinny)\nMuscovite(jinny) -> Fatherly(jinny)\nforall x (Adherent(x) -> Muscovite(x))\nforall x (Muscovite(x) -> Misrelated(x))\n\nMisrelated(jinny)\n\nAdherent(jinny) and forall x (Adherent(x) -> Muscovite(x)) -> therefore Muscovite(jinny) Muscovite(jinny) and forall x (Muscovite(x) -> Misrelated(x)) -> therefore Misrelated(jinny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The chrissy is papery. If the chrissy is wistful then the chrissy is splay. Red people are wistful. Round people are cloudlike. The chrissy is not cloudlike.", "logic": "\nPapery(chrissy)\nWistful(chrissy) -> Splay(chrissy)\nforall x (Papery(x) -> Wistful(x))\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Cloudlike(x))\n\nnot Cloudlike(chrissy)\n\nPapery(chrissy) and forall x (Papery(x) -> Wistful(x)) -> therefore Wistful(chrissy) Wistful(chrissy) and forall x (Wistful(x) -> Cloudlike(x)) -> therefore Cloudlike(chrissy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The valdemar is blamed. If the valdemar is biographic then the valdemar is uncool. Red people are biographic. Round people are vocal. The valdemar is not cold.", "logic": "\nBlamed(valdemar)\nBiographic(valdemar) -> Uncool(valdemar)\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Vocal(x))\n\nnot Cold(valdemar)\n\nnot Cold(valdemar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The kimberli is optimistic. If the kimberli is doting then the kimberli is unworkable. Red people are doting. Round people are reflexed. The kimberli visits the kimberli.", "logic": "\nOptimistic(kimberli)\nDoting(kimberli) -> Unworkable(kimberli)\nforall x (Optimistic(x) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Doting(x) -> Reflexed(x))\n\nVisits(kimberli, kimberli)\n\nVisits(kimberli, kimberli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The heda is platelike. If the heda is egregious then the heda is coreferent. Red people are egregious. Round people are vociferous. The heda does not see the heda.", "logic": "\nPlatelike(heda)\nEgregious(heda) -> Coreferent(heda)\nforall x (Platelike(x) -> Egregious(x))\nforall x (Egregious(x) -> Vociferous(x))\n\nnot Sees(heda, heda)\n\nnot Sees(heda, heda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "The cybel is cordiform. If the cybel is incapable then the cybel is cordial. Red people are incapable. Round people are reniform. The cybel likes the cybel.", "logic": "\nCordiform(cybel)\nIncapable(cybel) -> Cordial(cybel)\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> Incapable(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Reniform(x))\n\nLikes(cybel, cybel)\n\nLikes(cybel, cybel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-568"} {"premises": "Sheff is perverted. Sheff is imitation. Sheff is anoestrous. Sheff is apolitical. Sheff is bigmouthed. Sheff is fulgent. Sheff is unfrozen. Angelita is perverted. Angelita is imitation. Angelita is anoestrous. Angelita is apolitical. Angelita is bigmouthed. Angelita is fulgent. Angelita is unfrozen. Shadow is perverted. Shadow is apolitical. All bigmouthed, fulgent people are perverted. Quiet people are imitation. If someone is apolitical and unfrozen then they are anoestrous. If someone is apolitical and unfrozen then they are perverted. All anoestrous people are fulgent. If someone is anoestrous and perverted then they are fulgent. All unfrozen people are apolitical. Quiet people are unfrozen. Angelita is anoestrous.", "logic": "\nPerverted(sheff)\nImitation(sheff)\nAnoestrous(sheff)\nApolitical(sheff)\nBigmouthed(sheff)\nFulgent(sheff)\nUnfrozen(sheff)\nPerverted(angelita)\nImitation(angelita)\nAnoestrous(angelita)\nApolitical(angelita)\nBigmouthed(angelita)\nFulgent(angelita)\nUnfrozen(angelita)\nPerverted(shadow)\nApolitical(shadow)\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) and Fulgent(x) -> Perverted(x))\nforall x (Apolitical(x) -> Imitation(x))\nforall x (Apolitical(x) and Unfrozen(x) -> Anoestrous(x))\nforall x (Apolitical(x) and Unfrozen(x) -> Perverted(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Fulgent(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and Perverted(x) -> Fulgent(x))\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Apolitical(x))\nforall x (Apolitical(x) -> Unfrozen(x))\n\nAnoestrous(angelita)\n\ntherefore Anoestrous(angelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Roscoe is pliable. Roscoe is soulless. Roscoe is laden. Roscoe is highland. Roscoe is footling. Roscoe is sleeved. Roscoe is snakelike. Siffre is pliable. Siffre is soulless. Siffre is laden. Siffre is highland. Siffre is footling. Siffre is sleeved. Siffre is snakelike. Shir is pliable. Shir is highland. All footling, sleeved people are pliable. Quiet people are soulless. If someone is highland and snakelike then they are laden. If someone is highland and snakelike then they are pliable. All laden people are sleeved. If someone is laden and pliable then they are sleeved. All snakelike people are highland. Quiet people are snakelike. Roscoe is not soulless.", "logic": "\nPliable(roscoe)\nSoulless(roscoe)\nLaden(roscoe)\nHighland(roscoe)\nFootling(roscoe)\nSleeved(roscoe)\nSnakelike(roscoe)\nPliable(siffre)\nSoulless(siffre)\nLaden(siffre)\nHighland(siffre)\nFootling(siffre)\nSleeved(siffre)\nSnakelike(siffre)\nPliable(shir)\nHighland(shir)\nforall x (Footling(x) and Sleeved(x) -> Pliable(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Soulless(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) and Snakelike(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) and Snakelike(x) -> Pliable(x))\nforall x (Laden(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Laden(x) and Pliable(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Snakelike(x) -> Highland(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Snakelike(x))\n\nnot Soulless(roscoe)\n\ntherefore Soulless(roscoe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Chere is modular. Chere is worn. Chere is subtle. Chere is melodious. Chere is volatile. Chere is suboceanic. Chere is monogenic. Aurelia is modular. Aurelia is worn. Aurelia is subtle. Aurelia is melodious. Aurelia is volatile. Aurelia is suboceanic. Aurelia is monogenic. Reena is modular. Reena is melodious. All volatile, suboceanic people are modular. Quiet people are worn. If someone is melodious and monogenic then they are subtle. If someone is melodious and monogenic then they are modular. All subtle people are suboceanic. If someone is subtle and modular then they are suboceanic. All monogenic people are melodious. Quiet people are monogenic. Reena is monogenic.", "logic": "\nModular(chere)\nWorn(chere)\nSubtle(chere)\nMelodious(chere)\nVolatile(chere)\nSuboceanic(chere)\nMonogenic(chere)\nModular(aurelia)\nWorn(aurelia)\nSubtle(aurelia)\nMelodious(aurelia)\nVolatile(aurelia)\nSuboceanic(aurelia)\nMonogenic(aurelia)\nModular(reena)\nMelodious(reena)\nforall x (Volatile(x) and Suboceanic(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Melodious(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Subtle(x))\nforall x (Melodious(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Subtle(x) -> Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Subtle(x) and Modular(x) -> Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> Melodious(x))\nforall x (Melodious(x) -> Monogenic(x))\n\nMonogenic(reena)\n\nMelodious(reena) and forall x (Melodious(x) -> Monogenic(x)) -> therefore Monogenic(reena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Consolata is mislaid. Consolata is hurtful. Consolata is azure. Consolata is lumpy. Consolata is bimetallic. Consolata is tenebrious. Consolata is chimeral. Xylia is mislaid. Xylia is hurtful. Xylia is azure. Xylia is lumpy. Xylia is bimetallic. Xylia is tenebrious. Xylia is chimeral. Gustavus is mislaid. Gustavus is lumpy. All bimetallic, tenebrious people are mislaid. Quiet people are hurtful. If someone is lumpy and chimeral then they are azure. If someone is lumpy and chimeral then they are mislaid. All azure people are tenebrious. If someone is azure and mislaid then they are tenebrious. All chimeral people are lumpy. Quiet people are chimeral. Gustavus is not hurtful.", "logic": "\nMislaid(consolata)\nHurtful(consolata)\nAzure(consolata)\nLumpy(consolata)\nBimetallic(consolata)\nTenebrious(consolata)\nChimeral(consolata)\nMislaid(xylia)\nHurtful(xylia)\nAzure(xylia)\nLumpy(xylia)\nBimetallic(xylia)\nTenebrious(xylia)\nChimeral(xylia)\nMislaid(gustavus)\nLumpy(gustavus)\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and Tenebrious(x) -> Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Lumpy(x) -> Hurtful(x))\nforall x (Lumpy(x) and Chimeral(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Lumpy(x) and Chimeral(x) -> Mislaid(x))\nforall x (Azure(x) -> Tenebrious(x))\nforall x (Azure(x) and Mislaid(x) -> Tenebrious(x))\nforall x (Chimeral(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Lumpy(x) -> Chimeral(x))\n\nnot Hurtful(gustavus)\n\nLumpy(gustavus) and forall x (Lumpy(x) -> Hurtful(x)) -> therefore Hurtful(gustavus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Amabelle is nonelected. Amabelle is obviating. Amabelle is monochrome. Amabelle is passee. Amabelle is undeniable. Amabelle is wayfaring. Amabelle is gammy. Daisy is nonelected. Daisy is obviating. Daisy is monochrome. Daisy is passee. Daisy is undeniable. Daisy is wayfaring. Daisy is gammy. Dalia is nonelected. Dalia is passee. All undeniable, wayfaring people are nonelected. Quiet people are obviating. If someone is passee and gammy then they are monochrome. If someone is passee and gammy then they are nonelected. All monochrome people are wayfaring. If someone is monochrome and nonelected then they are wayfaring. All gammy people are passee. Quiet people are gammy. Dalia is monochrome.", "logic": "\nNonelected(amabelle)\nObviating(amabelle)\nMonochrome(amabelle)\nPassee(amabelle)\nUndeniable(amabelle)\nWayfaring(amabelle)\nGammy(amabelle)\nNonelected(daisy)\nObviating(daisy)\nMonochrome(daisy)\nPassee(daisy)\nUndeniable(daisy)\nWayfaring(daisy)\nGammy(daisy)\nNonelected(dalia)\nPassee(dalia)\nforall x (Undeniable(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) and Gammy(x) -> Monochrome(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) and Gammy(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Monochrome(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Gammy(x) -> Passee(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Gammy(x))\n\nMonochrome(dalia)\n\nPassee(dalia) and forall x (Passee(x) -> Gammy(x)) -> therefore Gammy(dalia) Passee(dalia) and Gammy(dalia) and forall x (Passee(x) and Gammy(x) -> Monochrome(x)) -> therefore Monochrome(dalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Roze is communal. Roze is unlocked. Roze is inarguable. Roze is crustal. Roze is dioestrous. Roze is bacterioid. Roze is capitular. Adena is communal. Adena is unlocked. Adena is inarguable. Adena is crustal. Adena is dioestrous. Adena is bacterioid. Adena is capitular. Megen is communal. Megen is crustal. All dioestrous, bacterioid people are communal. Quiet people are unlocked. If someone is crustal and capitular then they are inarguable. If someone is crustal and capitular then they are communal. All inarguable people are bacterioid. If someone is inarguable and communal then they are bacterioid. All capitular people are crustal. Quiet people are capitular. Megen is not inarguable.", "logic": "\nCommunal(roze)\nUnlocked(roze)\nInarguable(roze)\nCrustal(roze)\nDioestrous(roze)\nBacterioid(roze)\nCapitular(roze)\nCommunal(adena)\nUnlocked(adena)\nInarguable(adena)\nCrustal(adena)\nDioestrous(adena)\nBacterioid(adena)\nCapitular(adena)\nCommunal(megen)\nCrustal(megen)\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) and Bacterioid(x) -> Communal(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) -> Unlocked(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) and Capitular(x) -> Inarguable(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) and Capitular(x) -> Communal(x))\nforall x (Inarguable(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Inarguable(x) and Communal(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> Crustal(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) -> Capitular(x))\n\nnot Inarguable(megen)\n\nCrustal(megen) and forall x (Crustal(x) -> Capitular(x)) -> therefore Capitular(megen) Crustal(megen) and Capitular(megen) and forall x (Crustal(x) and Capitular(x) -> Inarguable(x)) -> therefore Inarguable(megen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Selena is whirring. Selena is uncoerced. Selena is mandibular. Selena is suntanned. Selena is unalert. Selena is stomatous. Selena is umbellate. Albrecht is whirring. Albrecht is uncoerced. Albrecht is mandibular. Albrecht is suntanned. Albrecht is unalert. Albrecht is stomatous. Albrecht is umbellate. Veronike is whirring. Veronike is suntanned. All unalert, stomatous people are whirring. Quiet people are uncoerced. If someone is suntanned and umbellate then they are mandibular. If someone is suntanned and umbellate then they are whirring. All mandibular people are stomatous. If someone is mandibular and whirring then they are stomatous. All umbellate people are suntanned. Quiet people are umbellate. Veronike is stomatous.", "logic": "\nWhirring(selena)\nUncoerced(selena)\nMandibular(selena)\nSuntanned(selena)\nUnalert(selena)\nStomatous(selena)\nUmbellate(selena)\nWhirring(albrecht)\nUncoerced(albrecht)\nMandibular(albrecht)\nSuntanned(albrecht)\nUnalert(albrecht)\nStomatous(albrecht)\nUmbellate(albrecht)\nWhirring(veronike)\nSuntanned(veronike)\nforall x (Unalert(x) and Stomatous(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Mandibular(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Whirring(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Stomatous(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) and Whirring(x) -> Stomatous(x))\nforall x (Umbellate(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) -> Umbellate(x))\n\nStomatous(veronike)\n\nSuntanned(veronike) and forall x (Suntanned(x) -> Umbellate(x)) -> therefore Umbellate(veronike) Suntanned(veronike) and Umbellate(veronike) and forall x (Suntanned(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Mandibular(x)) -> therefore Mandibular(veronike) Mandibular(veronike) and forall x (Mandibular(x) -> Stomatous(x)) -> therefore Stomatous(veronike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Hailee is asterisked. Hailee is sensitised. Hailee is rheologic. Hailee is callous. Hailee is iraqi. Hailee is mobbish. Hailee is determined. Saunders is asterisked. Saunders is sensitised. Saunders is rheologic. Saunders is callous. Saunders is iraqi. Saunders is mobbish. Saunders is determined. Lezlie is asterisked. Lezlie is callous. All iraqi, mobbish people are asterisked. Quiet people are sensitised. If someone is callous and determined then they are rheologic. If someone is callous and determined then they are asterisked. All rheologic people are mobbish. If someone is rheologic and asterisked then they are mobbish. All determined people are callous. Quiet people are determined. Lezlie is not mobbish.", "logic": "\nAsterisked(hailee)\nSensitised(hailee)\nRheologic(hailee)\nCallous(hailee)\nIraqi(hailee)\nMobbish(hailee)\nDetermined(hailee)\nAsterisked(saunders)\nSensitised(saunders)\nRheologic(saunders)\nCallous(saunders)\nIraqi(saunders)\nMobbish(saunders)\nDetermined(saunders)\nAsterisked(lezlie)\nCallous(lezlie)\nforall x (Iraqi(x) and Mobbish(x) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Callous(x) -> Sensitised(x))\nforall x (Callous(x) and Determined(x) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Callous(x) and Determined(x) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Rheologic(x) and Asterisked(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Callous(x))\nforall x (Callous(x) -> Determined(x))\n\nnot Mobbish(lezlie)\n\nCallous(lezlie) and forall x (Callous(x) -> Determined(x)) -> therefore Determined(lezlie) Callous(lezlie) and Determined(lezlie) and forall x (Callous(x) and Determined(x) -> Rheologic(x)) -> therefore Rheologic(lezlie) Rheologic(lezlie) and forall x (Rheologic(x) -> Mobbish(x)) -> therefore Mobbish(lezlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1282"} {"premises": "Mark is amended. Aphrodite is majestic. Cold people are not amended. Young people are not amended. Mark is amended.", "logic": "\nAmended(mark)\nMajestic(aphrodite)\nforall x (Ethnic(x) -> not Amended(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> not Amended(x))\n\nAmended(mark)\n\ntherefore Amended(mark)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4435"} {"premises": "Erminia is arcane. Linn is prominent. Cold people are not arcane. Young people are not arcane. Linn is not prominent.", "logic": "\nArcane(erminia)\nProminent(linn)\nforall x (Squealing(x) -> not Arcane(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) -> not Arcane(x))\n\nnot Prominent(linn)\n\ntherefore Prominent(linn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4435"} {"premises": "Neala is trancelike. Natassia is immaculate. Cold people are not trancelike. Young people are not trancelike. Natassia is not barebacked.", "logic": "\nTrancelike(neala)\nImmaculate(natassia)\nforall x (Barebacked(x) -> not Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Threadbare(x) -> not Trancelike(x))\n\nnot Barebacked(natassia)\n\nnot Barebacked(natassia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4435"} {"premises": "Chrystel is tangible. Celine is sometime. Cold people are not tangible. Young people are not tangible. Chrystel is sometime.", "logic": "\nTangible(chrystel)\nSometime(celine)\nforall x (Iridic(x) -> not Tangible(x))\nforall x (Important(x) -> not Tangible(x))\n\nSometime(chrystel)\n\nSometime(chrystel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4435"} {"premises": "Floyd is freehand. Floyd is focal. Floyd is unheard. Floyd is clonic. Floyd is inedible. Tressa is freehand. Tressa is nauseating. Tressa is verbalised. Tressa is unheard. Tressa is clonic. Tressa is inedible. Jyoti is freehand. Jyoti is verbalised. Jyoti is focal. Jyoti is clonic. Jyoti is inedible. If something is focal and verbalised then it is nauseating. Young, unheard things are clonic. If something is focal and unheard then it is verbalised. Floyd is focal.", "logic": "\nFreehand(floyd)\nFocal(floyd)\nUnheard(floyd)\nClonic(floyd)\nInedible(floyd)\nFreehand(tressa)\nNauseating(tressa)\nVerbalised(tressa)\nUnheard(tressa)\nClonic(tressa)\nInedible(tressa)\nFreehand(jyoti)\nVerbalised(jyoti)\nFocal(jyoti)\nClonic(jyoti)\nInedible(jyoti)\nforall x (Focal(x) and Verbalised(x) -> Nauseating(x))\nforall x (Inedible(x) and Unheard(x) -> Clonic(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) and Unheard(x) -> Verbalised(x))\n\nFocal(floyd)\n\ntherefore Focal(floyd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Bartie is medieval. Bartie is deadpan. Bartie is cheerless. Bartie is limbed. Bartie is maiden. Peri is medieval. Peri is prepaid. Peri is austere. Peri is cheerless. Peri is limbed. Peri is maiden. Silva is medieval. Silva is austere. Silva is deadpan. Silva is limbed. Silva is maiden. If something is deadpan and austere then it is prepaid. Young, cheerless things are limbed. If something is deadpan and cheerless then it is austere. Silva is not austere.", "logic": "\nMedieval(bartie)\nDeadpan(bartie)\nCheerless(bartie)\nLimbed(bartie)\nMaiden(bartie)\nMedieval(peri)\nPrepaid(peri)\nAustere(peri)\nCheerless(peri)\nLimbed(peri)\nMaiden(peri)\nMedieval(silva)\nAustere(silva)\nDeadpan(silva)\nLimbed(silva)\nMaiden(silva)\nforall x (Deadpan(x) and Austere(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Maiden(x) and Cheerless(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Deadpan(x) and Cheerless(x) -> Austere(x))\n\nnot Austere(silva)\n\ntherefore Austere(silva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Leonhard is hulking. Leonhard is autosomal. Leonhard is plushy. Leonhard is warmed. Leonhard is tiered. Riva is hulking. Riva is unmilitary. Riva is lifelike. Riva is plushy. Riva is warmed. Riva is tiered. Kelcey is hulking. Kelcey is lifelike. Kelcey is autosomal. Kelcey is warmed. Kelcey is tiered. If something is autosomal and lifelike then it is unmilitary. Young, plushy things are warmed. If something is autosomal and plushy then it is lifelike. Leonhard is lifelike.", "logic": "\nHulking(leonhard)\nAutosomal(leonhard)\nPlushy(leonhard)\nWarmed(leonhard)\nTiered(leonhard)\nHulking(riva)\nUnmilitary(riva)\nLifelike(riva)\nPlushy(riva)\nWarmed(riva)\nTiered(riva)\nHulking(kelcey)\nLifelike(kelcey)\nAutosomal(kelcey)\nWarmed(kelcey)\nTiered(kelcey)\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Lifelike(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\nforall x (Tiered(x) and Plushy(x) -> Warmed(x))\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Plushy(x) -> Lifelike(x))\n\nLifelike(leonhard)\n\nAutosomal(leonhard) and Plushy(leonhard) and forall x (Autosomal(x) and Plushy(x) -> Lifelike(x)) -> therefore Lifelike(leonhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Benni is daughterly. Benni is recumbent. Benni is heliacal. Benni is ashy. Benni is cohesive. Harriet is daughterly. Harriet is diseased. Harriet is irritative. Harriet is heliacal. Harriet is ashy. Harriet is cohesive. Joleen is daughterly. Joleen is irritative. Joleen is recumbent. Joleen is ashy. Joleen is cohesive. If something is recumbent and irritative then it is diseased. Young, heliacal things are ashy. If something is recumbent and heliacal then it is irritative. Joleen is not diseased.", "logic": "\nDaughterly(benni)\nRecumbent(benni)\nHeliacal(benni)\nAshy(benni)\nCohesive(benni)\nDaughterly(harriet)\nDiseased(harriet)\nIrritative(harriet)\nHeliacal(harriet)\nAshy(harriet)\nCohesive(harriet)\nDaughterly(joleen)\nIrritative(joleen)\nRecumbent(joleen)\nAshy(joleen)\nCohesive(joleen)\nforall x (Recumbent(x) and Irritative(x) -> Diseased(x))\nforall x (Cohesive(x) and Heliacal(x) -> Ashy(x))\nforall x (Recumbent(x) and Heliacal(x) -> Irritative(x))\n\nnot Diseased(joleen)\n\nRecumbent(joleen) and Irritative(joleen) and forall x (Recumbent(x) and Irritative(x) -> Diseased(x)) -> therefore Diseased(joleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Sonia is bilocular. Sonia is assisted. Sonia is auxinic. Sonia is unclear. Sonia is quizzical. Gamaliel is bilocular. Gamaliel is purplish. Gamaliel is echoic. Gamaliel is auxinic. Gamaliel is unclear. Gamaliel is quizzical. Alvera is bilocular. Alvera is echoic. Alvera is assisted. Alvera is unclear. Alvera is quizzical. If something is assisted and echoic then it is purplish. Young, auxinic things are unclear. If something is assisted and auxinic then it is echoic. Sonia is purplish.", "logic": "\nBilocular(sonia)\nAssisted(sonia)\nAuxinic(sonia)\nUnclear(sonia)\nQuizzical(sonia)\nBilocular(gamaliel)\nPurplish(gamaliel)\nEchoic(gamaliel)\nAuxinic(gamaliel)\nUnclear(gamaliel)\nQuizzical(gamaliel)\nBilocular(alvera)\nEchoic(alvera)\nAssisted(alvera)\nUnclear(alvera)\nQuizzical(alvera)\nforall x (Assisted(x) and Echoic(x) -> Purplish(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) and Auxinic(x) -> Unclear(x))\nforall x (Assisted(x) and Auxinic(x) -> Echoic(x))\n\nPurplish(sonia)\n\nAssisted(sonia) and Auxinic(sonia) and forall x (Assisted(x) and Auxinic(x) -> Echoic(x)) -> therefore Echoic(sonia) Assisted(sonia) and Echoic(sonia) and forall x (Assisted(x) and Echoic(x) -> Purplish(x)) -> therefore Purplish(sonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Renault is repetitive. Renault is coalescent. Renault is farseeing. Renault is exegetical. Renault is grievous. Mollie is repetitive. Mollie is puffed. Mollie is emmetropic. Mollie is farseeing. Mollie is exegetical. Mollie is grievous. Zacharias is repetitive. Zacharias is emmetropic. Zacharias is coalescent. Zacharias is exegetical. Zacharias is grievous. If something is coalescent and emmetropic then it is puffed. Young, farseeing things are exegetical. If something is coalescent and farseeing then it is emmetropic. Renault is not puffed.", "logic": "\nRepetitive(renault)\nCoalescent(renault)\nFarseeing(renault)\nExegetical(renault)\nGrievous(renault)\nRepetitive(mollie)\nPuffed(mollie)\nEmmetropic(mollie)\nFarseeing(mollie)\nExegetical(mollie)\nGrievous(mollie)\nRepetitive(zacharias)\nEmmetropic(zacharias)\nCoalescent(zacharias)\nExegetical(zacharias)\nGrievous(zacharias)\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and Emmetropic(x) -> Puffed(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Farseeing(x) -> Exegetical(x))\nforall x (Coalescent(x) and Farseeing(x) -> Emmetropic(x))\n\nnot Puffed(renault)\n\nCoalescent(renault) and Farseeing(renault) and forall x (Coalescent(x) and Farseeing(x) -> Emmetropic(x)) -> therefore Emmetropic(renault) Coalescent(renault) and Emmetropic(renault) and forall x (Coalescent(x) and Emmetropic(x) -> Puffed(x)) -> therefore Puffed(renault)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Harvard is soignee. Harvard is downmarket. Harvard is unreliable. Harvard is wily. Harvard is sympatric. Janina is soignee. Janina is spoilable. Janina is curtal. Janina is unreliable. Janina is wily. Janina is sympatric. Alica is soignee. Alica is curtal. Alica is downmarket. Alica is wily. Alica is sympatric. If something is downmarket and curtal then it is spoilable. Young, unreliable things are wily. If something is downmarket and unreliable then it is curtal. Janina is not downmarket.", "logic": "\nSoignee(harvard)\nDownmarket(harvard)\nUnreliable(harvard)\nWily(harvard)\nSympatric(harvard)\nSoignee(janina)\nSpoilable(janina)\nCurtal(janina)\nUnreliable(janina)\nWily(janina)\nSympatric(janina)\nSoignee(alica)\nCurtal(alica)\nDownmarket(alica)\nWily(alica)\nSympatric(alica)\nforall x (Downmarket(x) and Curtal(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Sympatric(x) and Unreliable(x) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Downmarket(x) and Unreliable(x) -> Curtal(x))\n\nnot Downmarket(janina)\n\nnot Downmarket(janina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Shirlee is aluminous. Shirlee is summary. Shirlee is marxist. Shirlee is acidulent. Shirlee is forlorn. Wynne is aluminous. Wynne is loco. Wynne is extempore. Wynne is marxist. Wynne is acidulent. Wynne is forlorn. Thaxter is aluminous. Thaxter is extempore. Thaxter is summary. Thaxter is acidulent. Thaxter is forlorn. If something is summary and extempore then it is loco. Young, marxist things are acidulent. If something is summary and marxist then it is extempore. Thaxter is marxist.", "logic": "\nAluminous(shirlee)\nSummary(shirlee)\nMarxist(shirlee)\nAcidulent(shirlee)\nForlorn(shirlee)\nAluminous(wynne)\nLoco(wynne)\nExtempore(wynne)\nMarxist(wynne)\nAcidulent(wynne)\nForlorn(wynne)\nAluminous(thaxter)\nExtempore(thaxter)\nSummary(thaxter)\nAcidulent(thaxter)\nForlorn(thaxter)\nforall x (Summary(x) and Extempore(x) -> Loco(x))\nforall x (Forlorn(x) and Marxist(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Summary(x) and Marxist(x) -> Extempore(x))\n\nMarxist(thaxter)\n\nMarxist(thaxter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-640"} {"premises": "Kayley is typical. Vasili is referenced. Nelle is unlit. All unlit, uncensored things are coalesced. All noisome things are unlit. Young, coalesced things are uncensored. All bolivian things are noisome. If something is uncensored and referenced then it is unlit. Young things are bolivian. Vasili is referenced.", "logic": "\nTypical(kayley)\nReferenced(vasili)\nUnlit(nelle)\nforall x (Unlit(x) and Uncensored(x) -> Coalesced(x))\nforall x (Noisome(x) -> Unlit(x))\nforall x (Referenced(x) and Coalesced(x) -> Uncensored(x))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> Noisome(x))\nforall x (Uncensored(x) and Referenced(x) -> Unlit(x))\nforall x (Referenced(x) -> Bolivian(x))\n\nReferenced(vasili)\n\ntherefore Referenced(vasili)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Gerta is choral. Rebe is precocious. Jody is tigerish. All tigerish, bristly things are clathrate. All wheeled things are tigerish. Young, clathrate things are bristly. All ripened things are wheeled. If something is bristly and precocious then it is tigerish. Young things are ripened. Gerta is not choral.", "logic": "\nChoral(gerta)\nPrecocious(rebe)\nTigerish(jody)\nforall x (Tigerish(x) and Bristly(x) -> Clathrate(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Precocious(x) and Clathrate(x) -> Bristly(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nforall x (Bristly(x) and Precocious(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Precocious(x) -> Ripened(x))\n\nnot Choral(gerta)\n\ntherefore Choral(gerta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Auria is broadband. Silvio is puissant. Webster is deficient. All deficient, starving things are notched. All irritative things are deficient. Young, notched things are starving. All autacoidal things are irritative. If something is starving and puissant then it is deficient. Young things are autacoidal. Silvio is autacoidal.", "logic": "\nBroadband(auria)\nPuissant(silvio)\nDeficient(webster)\nforall x (Deficient(x) and Starving(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Irritative(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) and Notched(x) -> Starving(x))\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) -> Irritative(x))\nforall x (Starving(x) and Puissant(x) -> Deficient(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\n\nAutacoidal(silvio)\n\nPuissant(silvio) and forall x (Puissant(x) -> Autacoidal(x)) -> therefore Autacoidal(silvio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Betteanne is prognostic. Roland is paradisiac. Nicoline is barbarous. All barbarous, thyroidal things are genial. All colorectal things are barbarous. Young, genial things are thyroidal. All chelated things are colorectal. If something is thyroidal and paradisiac then it is barbarous. Young things are chelated. Roland is not chelated.", "logic": "\nPrognostic(betteanne)\nParadisiac(roland)\nBarbarous(nicoline)\nforall x (Barbarous(x) and Thyroidal(x) -> Genial(x))\nforall x (Colorectal(x) -> Barbarous(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) and Genial(x) -> Thyroidal(x))\nforall x (Chelated(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Thyroidal(x) and Paradisiac(x) -> Barbarous(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) -> Chelated(x))\n\nnot Chelated(roland)\n\nParadisiac(roland) and forall x (Paradisiac(x) -> Chelated(x)) -> therefore Chelated(roland)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Dedra is pucka. Emylee is figural. Benjy is vestmented. All vestmented, tenor things are linguistic. All peptic things are vestmented. Young, linguistic things are tenor. All isolating things are peptic. If something is tenor and figural then it is vestmented. Young things are isolating. Emylee is peptic.", "logic": "\nPucka(dedra)\nFigural(emylee)\nVestmented(benjy)\nforall x (Vestmented(x) and Tenor(x) -> Linguistic(x))\nforall x (Peptic(x) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) and Linguistic(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Isolating(x) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Tenor(x) and Figural(x) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Isolating(x))\n\nPeptic(emylee)\n\nFigural(emylee) and forall x (Figural(x) -> Isolating(x)) -> therefore Isolating(emylee) Isolating(emylee) and forall x (Isolating(x) -> Peptic(x)) -> therefore Peptic(emylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Cybil is nonimmune. Joan is wordless. Amalle is unjointed. All unjointed, deft things are awing. All tragicomic things are unjointed. Young, awing things are deft. All stubborn things are tragicomic. If something is deft and wordless then it is unjointed. Young things are stubborn. Joan is not tragicomic.", "logic": "\nNonimmune(cybil)\nWordless(joan)\nUnjointed(amalle)\nforall x (Unjointed(x) and Deft(x) -> Awing(x))\nforall x (Tragicomic(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) and Awing(x) -> Deft(x))\nforall x (Stubborn(x) -> Tragicomic(x))\nforall x (Deft(x) and Wordless(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Stubborn(x))\n\nnot Tragicomic(joan)\n\nWordless(joan) and forall x (Wordless(x) -> Stubborn(x)) -> therefore Stubborn(joan) Stubborn(joan) and forall x (Stubborn(x) -> Tragicomic(x)) -> therefore Tragicomic(joan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Niccolo is testaceous. Cornelle is declarable. Tella is unpitying. All unpitying, unsavoury things are unbooked. All riled things are unpitying. Young, unbooked things are unsavoury. All absent things are riled. If something is unsavoury and declarable then it is unpitying. Young things are absent. Cornelle is unpitying.", "logic": "\nTestaceous(niccolo)\nDeclarable(cornelle)\nUnpitying(tella)\nforall x (Unpitying(x) and Unsavoury(x) -> Unbooked(x))\nforall x (Riled(x) -> Unpitying(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) and Unbooked(x) -> Unsavoury(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) -> Riled(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) and Declarable(x) -> Unpitying(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Absent(x))\n\nUnpitying(cornelle)\n\nDeclarable(cornelle) and forall x (Declarable(x) -> Absent(x)) -> therefore Absent(cornelle) Absent(cornelle) and forall x (Absent(x) -> Riled(x)) -> therefore Riled(cornelle) Riled(cornelle) and forall x (Riled(x) -> Unpitying(x)) -> therefore Unpitying(cornelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Zelma is stellar. Darelle is ungulate. Britney is plausible. All plausible, screaky things are edental. All practiced things are plausible. Young, edental things are screaky. All outdoor things are practiced. If something is screaky and ungulate then it is plausible. Young things are outdoor. Darelle is not plausible.", "logic": "\nStellar(zelma)\nUngulate(darelle)\nPlausible(britney)\nforall x (Plausible(x) and Screaky(x) -> Edental(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Plausible(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and Edental(x) -> Screaky(x))\nforall x (Outdoor(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) and Ungulate(x) -> Plausible(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) -> Outdoor(x))\n\nnot Plausible(darelle)\n\nUngulate(darelle) and forall x (Ungulate(x) -> Outdoor(x)) -> therefore Outdoor(darelle) Outdoor(darelle) and forall x (Outdoor(x) -> Practiced(x)) -> therefore Practiced(darelle) Practiced(darelle) and forall x (Practiced(x) -> Plausible(x)) -> therefore Plausible(darelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Bertram is libellous. Datha is hooklike. Briney is giddy. All giddy, welcoming things are stitched. All monoecious things are giddy. Young, stitched things are welcoming. All maniclike things are monoecious. If something is welcoming and hooklike then it is giddy. Young things are maniclike. Datha is not welcoming.", "logic": "\nLibellous(bertram)\nHooklike(datha)\nGiddy(briney)\nforall x (Giddy(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Monoecious(x) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Hooklike(x) and Stitched(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nforall x (Maniclike(x) -> Monoecious(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) and Hooklike(x) -> Giddy(x))\nforall x (Hooklike(x) -> Maniclike(x))\n\nnot Welcoming(datha)\n\nforall x (Hooklike(x) and Stitched(x) -> Welcoming(x)) <- forall x (Giddy(x) and Welcoming(x) -> Stitched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Cathryn is oscine. Colline is barricaded. Scarlett is untrodden. All untrodden, fossilised things are undirected. All alto things are untrodden. Young, undirected things are fossilised. All bowfront things are alto. If something is fossilised and barricaded then it is untrodden. Young things are bowfront. Cathryn is untrodden.", "logic": "\nOscine(cathryn)\nBarricaded(colline)\nUntrodden(scarlett)\nforall x (Untrodden(x) and Fossilised(x) -> Undirected(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Barricaded(x) and Undirected(x) -> Fossilised(x))\nforall x (Bowfront(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Fossilised(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Untrodden(x))\nforall x (Barricaded(x) -> Bowfront(x))\n\nUntrodden(cathryn)\n\nforall x (Alto(x) -> Untrodden(x)) <- forall x (Bowfront(x) -> Alto(x)) <- forall x (Barricaded(x) -> Bowfront(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Leoine is macerative. Delilah is chitinous. Rhona is alimentary. All alimentary, requisite things are gluey. All inshore things are alimentary. Young, gluey things are requisite. All adulterant things are inshore. If something is requisite and chitinous then it is alimentary. Young things are adulterant. Delilah is not gluey.", "logic": "\nMacerative(leoine)\nChitinous(delilah)\nAlimentary(rhona)\nforall x (Alimentary(x) and Requisite(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Inshore(x) -> Alimentary(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) and Gluey(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) and Chitinous(x) -> Alimentary(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> Adulterant(x))\n\nnot Gluey(delilah)\n\nforall x (Alimentary(x) and Requisite(x) -> Gluey(x)) <- forall x (Chitinous(x) and Gluey(x) -> Requisite(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Diena is mundane. Aigneis is saurian. Joe is dovish. All dovish, heraldist things are unpleasing. All exacting things are dovish. Young, unpleasing things are heraldist. All hairless things are exacting. If something is heraldist and saurian then it is dovish. Young things are hairless. Diena is unpleasing.", "logic": "\nMundane(diena)\nSaurian(aigneis)\nDovish(joe)\nforall x (Dovish(x) and Heraldist(x) -> Unpleasing(x))\nforall x (Exacting(x) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) and Unpleasing(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) -> Exacting(x))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) and Saurian(x) -> Dovish(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) -> Hairless(x))\n\nUnpleasing(diena)\n\nforall x (Dovish(x) and Heraldist(x) -> Unpleasing(x)) <- forall x (Saurian(x) and Unpleasing(x) -> Heraldist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Clarinda is maximizing. Scotti is portly. Ariella is aligned. All aligned, overgrown things are whispered. All tufted things are aligned. Young, whispered things are overgrown. All orbital things are tufted. If something is overgrown and portly then it is aligned. Young things are orbital. Scotti is not maximizing.", "logic": "\nMaximizing(clarinda)\nPortly(scotti)\nAligned(ariella)\nforall x (Aligned(x) and Overgrown(x) -> Whispered(x))\nforall x (Tufted(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Portly(x) and Whispered(x) -> Overgrown(x))\nforall x (Orbital(x) -> Tufted(x))\nforall x (Overgrown(x) and Portly(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Portly(x) -> Orbital(x))\n\nnot Maximizing(scotti)\n\nnot Maximizing(scotti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Mordecai is stillborn. Herrick is unliveried. Kellyann is rank. All rank, preferred things are veinal. All banned things are rank. Young, veinal things are preferred. All iritic things are banned. If something is preferred and unliveried then it is rank. Young things are iritic. Mordecai is unliveried.", "logic": "\nStillborn(mordecai)\nUnliveried(herrick)\nRank(kellyann)\nforall x (Rank(x) and Preferred(x) -> Veinal(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Unliveried(x) and Veinal(x) -> Preferred(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Unliveried(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Unliveried(x) -> Iritic(x))\n\nUnliveried(mordecai)\n\nUnliveried(mordecai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Lambert is enervated. Ronnica is mutualist. Derby is hemophilic. All hemophilic, killable things are sanious. All lusty things are hemophilic. Young, sanious things are killable. All interested things are lusty. If something is killable and mutualist then it is hemophilic. Young things are interested. Derby is not enervated.", "logic": "\nEnervated(lambert)\nMutualist(ronnica)\nHemophilic(derby)\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) and Killable(x) -> Sanious(x))\nforall x (Lusty(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Mutualist(x) and Sanious(x) -> Killable(x))\nforall x (Interested(x) -> Lusty(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) and Mutualist(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Mutualist(x) -> Interested(x))\n\nnot Enervated(derby)\n\nnot Enervated(derby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "Zenia is palatine. Sholom is notorious. Cori is brachial. All brachial, abusive things are bald. All wobbling things are brachial. Young, bald things are abusive. All cystic things are wobbling. If something is abusive and notorious then it is brachial. Young things are cystic. Cori is notorious.", "logic": "\nPalatine(zenia)\nNotorious(sholom)\nBrachial(cori)\nforall x (Brachial(x) and Abusive(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Notorious(x) and Bald(x) -> Abusive(x))\nforall x (Cystic(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) and Notorious(x) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Notorious(x) -> Cystic(x))\n\nNotorious(cori)\n\nNotorious(cori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-100"} {"premises": "The vitia is slanderous. The vitia is manic. The vitia is unclean. The vitia down the gennifer. The vitia succuss the lou. The vitia pacify the lou. The gennifer is unclean. The gennifer succuss the vitia. The gennifer pacify the lou. The lou is manic. The lou is unclean. The lou succuss the gennifer. If someone succuss the vitia then they like the vitia. If someone pacify the vitia then the vitia is droopy. If someone down the vitia then the vitia pacify the gennifer. If someone is manic and they need the gennifer then the gennifer pacify the vitia. If someone succuss the vitia then the vitia succuss the lou. If someone is droopy and they like the gennifer then the gennifer succuss the lou. The vitia down the gennifer.", "logic": "\nSlanderous(vitia)\nManic(vitia)\nUnclean(vitia)\nDown(vitia, gennifer)\nSuccuss(vitia, lou)\nPacify(vitia, lou)\nUnclean(gennifer)\nSuccuss(gennifer, vitia)\nPacify(gennifer, lou)\nManic(lou)\nUnclean(lou)\nSuccuss(lou, gennifer)\nforall x (Succuss(x, vitia) -> Down(x, vitia))\nforall x (Pacify(x, vitia) -> Droopy(vitia))\nforall x (Down(x, vitia) -> Pacify(vitia, gennifer))\nforall x (Manic(x) and Succuss(x, gennifer) -> Pacify(gennifer, vitia))\nforall x (Succuss(x, vitia) -> Succuss(vitia, lou))\nforall x (Droopy(x) and Down(x, gennifer) -> Succuss(gennifer, lou))\n\nDown(vitia, gennifer)\n\ntherefore Down(vitia, gennifer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The valerie is referent. The valerie is faddish. The valerie is patronless. The valerie structure the amandy. The valerie toady the herby. The valerie station the herby. The amandy is patronless. The amandy toady the valerie. The amandy station the herby. The herby is faddish. The herby is patronless. The herby toady the amandy. If someone toady the valerie then they like the valerie. If someone station the valerie then the valerie is tudor. If someone structure the valerie then the valerie station the amandy. If someone is faddish and they need the amandy then the amandy station the valerie. If someone toady the valerie then the valerie toady the herby. If someone is tudor and they like the amandy then the amandy toady the herby. The valerie is not faddish.", "logic": "\nReferent(valerie)\nFaddish(valerie)\nPatronless(valerie)\nStructure(valerie, amandy)\nToady(valerie, herby)\nStation(valerie, herby)\nPatronless(amandy)\nToady(amandy, valerie)\nStation(amandy, herby)\nFaddish(herby)\nPatronless(herby)\nToady(herby, amandy)\nforall x (Toady(x, valerie) -> Structure(x, valerie))\nforall x (Station(x, valerie) -> Tudor(valerie))\nforall x (Structure(x, valerie) -> Station(valerie, amandy))\nforall x (Faddish(x) and Toady(x, amandy) -> Station(amandy, valerie))\nforall x (Toady(x, valerie) -> Toady(valerie, herby))\nforall x (Tudor(x) and Structure(x, amandy) -> Toady(amandy, herby))\n\nnot Faddish(valerie)\n\ntherefore Faddish(valerie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The antonina is alien. The antonina is healthier. The antonina is fictive. The antonina enlighten the anson. The antonina recycle the elise. The antonina inform the elise. The anson is fictive. The anson recycle the antonina. The anson inform the elise. The elise is healthier. The elise is fictive. The elise recycle the anson. If someone recycle the antonina then they like the antonina. If someone inform the antonina then the antonina is duncish. If someone enlighten the antonina then the antonina inform the anson. If someone is healthier and they need the anson then the anson inform the antonina. If someone recycle the antonina then the antonina recycle the elise. If someone is duncish and they like the anson then the anson recycle the elise. The anson enlighten the antonina.", "logic": "\nAlien(antonina)\nHealthier(antonina)\nFictive(antonina)\nEnlighten(antonina, anson)\nRecycle(antonina, elise)\nInform(antonina, elise)\nFictive(anson)\nRecycle(anson, antonina)\nInform(anson, elise)\nHealthier(elise)\nFictive(elise)\nRecycle(elise, anson)\nforall x (Recycle(x, antonina) -> Enlighten(x, antonina))\nforall x (Inform(x, antonina) -> Duncish(antonina))\nforall x (Enlighten(x, antonina) -> Inform(antonina, anson))\nforall x (Healthier(x) and Recycle(x, anson) -> Inform(anson, antonina))\nforall x (Recycle(x, antonina) -> Recycle(antonina, elise))\nforall x (Duncish(x) and Enlighten(x, anson) -> Recycle(anson, elise))\n\nEnlighten(anson, antonina)\n\nRecycle(anson, antonina) and forall x (Recycle(x, antonina) -> Enlighten(x, antonina)) -> therefore Enlighten(anson, antonina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The ericka is dyadic. The ericka is adverbial. The ericka is vegetal. The ericka moulder the tessa. The ericka clout the veronique. The ericka alienate the veronique. The tessa is vegetal. The tessa clout the ericka. The tessa alienate the veronique. The veronique is adverbial. The veronique is vegetal. The veronique clout the tessa. If someone clout the ericka then they like the ericka. If someone alienate the ericka then the ericka is coseismic. If someone moulder the ericka then the ericka alienate the tessa. If someone is adverbial and they need the tessa then the tessa alienate the ericka. If someone clout the ericka then the ericka clout the veronique. If someone is coseismic and they like the tessa then the tessa clout the veronique. The tessa does not visit the ericka.", "logic": "\nDyadic(ericka)\nAdverbial(ericka)\nVegetal(ericka)\nMoulder(ericka, tessa)\nClout(ericka, veronique)\nAlienate(ericka, veronique)\nVegetal(tessa)\nClout(tessa, ericka)\nAlienate(tessa, veronique)\nAdverbial(veronique)\nVegetal(veronique)\nClout(veronique, tessa)\nforall x (Clout(x, ericka) -> Moulder(x, ericka))\nforall x (Alienate(x, ericka) -> Coseismic(ericka))\nforall x (Moulder(x, ericka) -> Alienate(ericka, tessa))\nforall x (Adverbial(x) and Clout(x, tessa) -> Alienate(tessa, ericka))\nforall x (Clout(x, ericka) -> Clout(ericka, veronique))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) and Moulder(x, tessa) -> Clout(tessa, veronique))\n\nnot Alienate(tessa, ericka)\n\nAdverbial(veronique) and Clout(veronique, tessa) and forall x (Adverbial(x) and Clout(x, tessa) -> Alienate(tessa, ericka)) -> therefore Alienate(tessa, ericka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The maggi is vendable. The maggi is murdered. The maggi is honey. The maggi conjoin the katlin. The maggi branch the harvey. The maggi outmode the harvey. The katlin is honey. The katlin branch the maggi. The katlin outmode the harvey. The harvey is murdered. The harvey is honey. The harvey branch the katlin. If someone branch the maggi then they like the maggi. If someone outmode the maggi then the maggi is petalled. If someone conjoin the maggi then the maggi outmode the katlin. If someone is murdered and they need the katlin then the katlin outmode the maggi. If someone branch the maggi then the maggi branch the harvey. If someone is petalled and they like the katlin then the katlin branch the harvey. The maggi outmode the katlin.", "logic": "\nVendable(maggi)\nMurdered(maggi)\nHoney(maggi)\nConjoin(maggi, katlin)\nBranch(maggi, harvey)\nOutmode(maggi, harvey)\nHoney(katlin)\nBranch(katlin, maggi)\nOutmode(katlin, harvey)\nMurdered(harvey)\nHoney(harvey)\nBranch(harvey, katlin)\nforall x (Branch(x, maggi) -> Conjoin(x, maggi))\nforall x (Outmode(x, maggi) -> Petalled(maggi))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, maggi) -> Outmode(maggi, katlin))\nforall x (Murdered(x) and Branch(x, katlin) -> Outmode(katlin, maggi))\nforall x (Branch(x, maggi) -> Branch(maggi, harvey))\nforall x (Petalled(x) and Conjoin(x, katlin) -> Branch(katlin, harvey))\n\nOutmode(maggi, katlin)\n\nBranch(katlin, maggi) and forall x (Branch(x, maggi) -> Conjoin(x, maggi)) -> therefore Conjoin(katlin, maggi) Conjoin(katlin, maggi) and forall x (Conjoin(x, maggi) -> Outmode(maggi, katlin)) -> therefore Outmode(maggi, katlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The jojo is grenadian. The jojo is defamatory. The jojo is productive. The jojo prang the gabey. The jojo randomize the aldo. The jojo undertake the aldo. The gabey is productive. The gabey randomize the jojo. The gabey undertake the aldo. The aldo is defamatory. The aldo is productive. The aldo randomize the gabey. If someone randomize the jojo then they like the jojo. If someone undertake the jojo then the jojo is dural. If someone prang the jojo then the jojo undertake the gabey. If someone is defamatory and they need the gabey then the gabey undertake the jojo. If someone randomize the jojo then the jojo randomize the aldo. If someone is dural and they like the gabey then the gabey randomize the aldo. The jojo does not visit the gabey.", "logic": "\nGrenadian(jojo)\nDefamatory(jojo)\nProductive(jojo)\nPrang(jojo, gabey)\nRandomize(jojo, aldo)\nUndertake(jojo, aldo)\nProductive(gabey)\nRandomize(gabey, jojo)\nUndertake(gabey, aldo)\nDefamatory(aldo)\nProductive(aldo)\nRandomize(aldo, gabey)\nforall x (Randomize(x, jojo) -> Prang(x, jojo))\nforall x (Undertake(x, jojo) -> Dural(jojo))\nforall x (Prang(x, jojo) -> Undertake(jojo, gabey))\nforall x (Defamatory(x) and Randomize(x, gabey) -> Undertake(gabey, jojo))\nforall x (Randomize(x, jojo) -> Randomize(jojo, aldo))\nforall x (Dural(x) and Prang(x, gabey) -> Randomize(gabey, aldo))\n\nnot Undertake(jojo, gabey)\n\nRandomize(gabey, jojo) and forall x (Randomize(x, jojo) -> Prang(x, jojo)) -> therefore Prang(gabey, jojo) Prang(gabey, jojo) and forall x (Prang(x, jojo) -> Undertake(jojo, gabey)) -> therefore Undertake(jojo, gabey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The reena is propelling. The reena is numberless. The reena is dreaded. The reena marcel the franklin. The reena sensify the hamlen. The reena gauffer the hamlen. The franklin is dreaded. The franklin sensify the reena. The franklin gauffer the hamlen. The hamlen is numberless. The hamlen is dreaded. The hamlen sensify the franklin. If someone sensify the reena then they like the reena. If someone gauffer the reena then the reena is grotty. If someone marcel the reena then the reena gauffer the franklin. If someone is numberless and they need the franklin then the franklin gauffer the reena. If someone sensify the reena then the reena sensify the hamlen. If someone is grotty and they like the franklin then the franklin sensify the hamlen. The franklin sensify the hamlen.", "logic": "\nPropelling(reena)\nNumberless(reena)\nDreaded(reena)\nMarcel(reena, franklin)\nSensify(reena, hamlen)\nGauffer(reena, hamlen)\nDreaded(franklin)\nSensify(franklin, reena)\nGauffer(franklin, hamlen)\nNumberless(hamlen)\nDreaded(hamlen)\nSensify(hamlen, franklin)\nforall x (Sensify(x, reena) -> Marcel(x, reena))\nforall x (Gauffer(x, reena) -> Grotty(reena))\nforall x (Marcel(x, reena) -> Gauffer(reena, franklin))\nforall x (Numberless(x) and Sensify(x, franklin) -> Gauffer(franklin, reena))\nforall x (Sensify(x, reena) -> Sensify(reena, hamlen))\nforall x (Grotty(x) and Marcel(x, franklin) -> Sensify(franklin, hamlen))\n\nSensify(franklin, hamlen)\n\nNumberless(hamlen) and Sensify(hamlen, franklin) and forall x (Numberless(x) and Sensify(x, franklin) -> Gauffer(franklin, reena)) -> therefore Gauffer(franklin, reena) Gauffer(franklin, reena) and forall x (Gauffer(x, reena) -> Grotty(reena)) -> therefore Grotty(reena) Grotty(reena) and Marcel(reena, franklin) and forall x (Grotty(x) and Marcel(x, franklin) -> Sensify(franklin, hamlen)) -> therefore Sensify(franklin, hamlen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The phebe is underhand. The phebe is anguished. The phebe is cyclonal. The phebe clangor the ioana. The phebe agnize the joy. The phebe prefigure the joy. The ioana is cyclonal. The ioana agnize the phebe. The ioana prefigure the joy. The joy is anguished. The joy is cyclonal. The joy agnize the ioana. If someone agnize the phebe then they like the phebe. If someone prefigure the phebe then the phebe is wormlike. If someone clangor the phebe then the phebe prefigure the ioana. If someone is anguished and they need the ioana then the ioana prefigure the phebe. If someone agnize the phebe then the phebe agnize the joy. If someone is wormlike and they like the ioana then the ioana agnize the joy. The ioana does not need the joy.", "logic": "\nUnderhand(phebe)\nAnguished(phebe)\nCyclonal(phebe)\nClangor(phebe, ioana)\nAgnize(phebe, joy)\nPrefigure(phebe, joy)\nCyclonal(ioana)\nAgnize(ioana, phebe)\nPrefigure(ioana, joy)\nAnguished(joy)\nCyclonal(joy)\nAgnize(joy, ioana)\nforall x (Agnize(x, phebe) -> Clangor(x, phebe))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, phebe) -> Wormlike(phebe))\nforall x (Clangor(x, phebe) -> Prefigure(phebe, ioana))\nforall x (Anguished(x) and Agnize(x, ioana) -> Prefigure(ioana, phebe))\nforall x (Agnize(x, phebe) -> Agnize(phebe, joy))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) and Clangor(x, ioana) -> Agnize(ioana, joy))\n\nnot Agnize(ioana, joy)\n\nAnguished(joy) and Agnize(joy, ioana) and forall x (Anguished(x) and Agnize(x, ioana) -> Prefigure(ioana, phebe)) -> therefore Prefigure(ioana, phebe) Prefigure(ioana, phebe) and forall x (Prefigure(x, phebe) -> Wormlike(phebe)) -> therefore Wormlike(phebe) Wormlike(phebe) and Clangor(phebe, ioana) and forall x (Wormlike(x) and Clangor(x, ioana) -> Agnize(ioana, joy)) -> therefore Agnize(ioana, joy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The ryann is bald. The ryann is reprobate. The ryann is carthusian. The ryann outpace the lauren. The ryann varnish the flor. The ryann abrase the flor. The lauren is carthusian. The lauren varnish the ryann. The lauren abrase the flor. The flor is reprobate. The flor is carthusian. The flor varnish the lauren. If someone varnish the ryann then they like the ryann. If someone abrase the ryann then the ryann is choosy. If someone outpace the ryann then the ryann abrase the lauren. If someone is reprobate and they need the lauren then the lauren abrase the ryann. If someone varnish the ryann then the ryann varnish the flor. If someone is choosy and they like the lauren then the lauren varnish the flor. The ryann does not like the ryann.", "logic": "\nBald(ryann)\nReprobate(ryann)\nCarthusian(ryann)\nOutpace(ryann, lauren)\nVarnish(ryann, flor)\nAbrase(ryann, flor)\nCarthusian(lauren)\nVarnish(lauren, ryann)\nAbrase(lauren, flor)\nReprobate(flor)\nCarthusian(flor)\nVarnish(flor, lauren)\nforall x (Varnish(x, ryann) -> Outpace(x, ryann))\nforall x (Abrase(x, ryann) -> Choosy(ryann))\nforall x (Outpace(x, ryann) -> Abrase(ryann, lauren))\nforall x (Reprobate(x) and Varnish(x, lauren) -> Abrase(lauren, ryann))\nforall x (Varnish(x, ryann) -> Varnish(ryann, flor))\nforall x (Choosy(x) and Outpace(x, lauren) -> Varnish(lauren, flor))\n\nnot Outpace(ryann, ryann)\n\nforall x (Varnish(x, ryann) -> Outpace(x, ryann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The zacharia is alien. The zacharia is scottish. The zacharia is manky. The zacharia chisel the enriqueta. The zacharia citrate the durante. The zacharia revet the durante. The enriqueta is manky. The enriqueta citrate the zacharia. The enriqueta revet the durante. The durante is scottish. The durante is manky. The durante citrate the enriqueta. If someone citrate the zacharia then they like the zacharia. If someone revet the zacharia then the zacharia is cuspidate. If someone chisel the zacharia then the zacharia revet the enriqueta. If someone is scottish and they need the enriqueta then the enriqueta revet the zacharia. If someone citrate the zacharia then the zacharia citrate the durante. If someone is cuspidate and they like the enriqueta then the enriqueta citrate the durante. The durante chisel the zacharia.", "logic": "\nAlien(zacharia)\nScottish(zacharia)\nManky(zacharia)\nChisel(zacharia, enriqueta)\nCitrate(zacharia, durante)\nRevet(zacharia, durante)\nManky(enriqueta)\nCitrate(enriqueta, zacharia)\nRevet(enriqueta, durante)\nScottish(durante)\nManky(durante)\nCitrate(durante, enriqueta)\nforall x (Citrate(x, zacharia) -> Chisel(x, zacharia))\nforall x (Revet(x, zacharia) -> Cuspidate(zacharia))\nforall x (Chisel(x, zacharia) -> Revet(zacharia, enriqueta))\nforall x (Scottish(x) and Citrate(x, enriqueta) -> Revet(enriqueta, zacharia))\nforall x (Citrate(x, zacharia) -> Citrate(zacharia, durante))\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) and Chisel(x, enriqueta) -> Citrate(enriqueta, durante))\n\nChisel(durante, zacharia)\n\nforall x (Citrate(x, zacharia) -> Chisel(x, zacharia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The ferdinand is laryngeal. The ferdinand is analytic. The ferdinand is stalwart. The ferdinand sled the alana. The ferdinand channelise the matias. The ferdinand relinquish the matias. The alana is stalwart. The alana channelise the ferdinand. The alana relinquish the matias. The matias is analytic. The matias is stalwart. The matias channelise the alana. If someone channelise the ferdinand then they like the ferdinand. If someone relinquish the ferdinand then the ferdinand is burrlike. If someone sled the ferdinand then the ferdinand relinquish the alana. If someone is analytic and they need the alana then the alana relinquish the ferdinand. If someone channelise the ferdinand then the ferdinand channelise the matias. If someone is burrlike and they like the alana then the alana channelise the matias. The alana is not young.", "logic": "\nLaryngeal(ferdinand)\nAnalytic(ferdinand)\nStalwart(ferdinand)\nSled(ferdinand, alana)\nChannelise(ferdinand, matias)\nRelinquish(ferdinand, matias)\nStalwart(alana)\nChannelise(alana, ferdinand)\nRelinquish(alana, matias)\nAnalytic(matias)\nStalwart(matias)\nChannelise(matias, alana)\nforall x (Channelise(x, ferdinand) -> Sled(x, ferdinand))\nforall x (Relinquish(x, ferdinand) -> Burrlike(ferdinand))\nforall x (Sled(x, ferdinand) -> Relinquish(ferdinand, alana))\nforall x (Analytic(x) and Channelise(x, alana) -> Relinquish(alana, ferdinand))\nforall x (Channelise(x, ferdinand) -> Channelise(ferdinand, matias))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) and Sled(x, alana) -> Channelise(alana, matias))\n\nnot Young(alana)\n\nnot Young(alana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The tomlin is achaean. The tomlin is shinto. The tomlin is coalescing. The tomlin floodlight the vance. The tomlin fasten the jethro. The tomlin potentiate the jethro. The vance is coalescing. The vance fasten the tomlin. The vance potentiate the jethro. The jethro is shinto. The jethro is coalescing. The jethro fasten the vance. If someone fasten the tomlin then they like the tomlin. If someone potentiate the tomlin then the tomlin is litigious. If someone floodlight the tomlin then the tomlin potentiate the vance. If someone is shinto and they need the vance then the vance potentiate the tomlin. If someone fasten the tomlin then the tomlin fasten the jethro. If someone is litigious and they like the vance then the vance fasten the jethro. The vance floodlight the jethro.", "logic": "\nAchaean(tomlin)\nShinto(tomlin)\nCoalescing(tomlin)\nFloodlight(tomlin, vance)\nFasten(tomlin, jethro)\nPotentiate(tomlin, jethro)\nCoalescing(vance)\nFasten(vance, tomlin)\nPotentiate(vance, jethro)\nShinto(jethro)\nCoalescing(jethro)\nFasten(jethro, vance)\nforall x (Fasten(x, tomlin) -> Floodlight(x, tomlin))\nforall x (Potentiate(x, tomlin) -> Litigious(tomlin))\nforall x (Floodlight(x, tomlin) -> Potentiate(tomlin, vance))\nforall x (Shinto(x) and Fasten(x, vance) -> Potentiate(vance, tomlin))\nforall x (Fasten(x, tomlin) -> Fasten(tomlin, jethro))\nforall x (Litigious(x) and Floodlight(x, vance) -> Fasten(vance, jethro))\n\nFloodlight(vance, jethro)\n\nFloodlight(vance, jethro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The mort is reliable. The mort is plushy. The mort is expiative. The mort engild the charmion. The mort dally the dewey. The mort worship the dewey. The charmion is expiative. The charmion dally the mort. The charmion worship the dewey. The dewey is plushy. The dewey is expiative. The dewey dally the charmion. If someone dally the mort then they like the mort. If someone worship the mort then the mort is lacelike. If someone engild the mort then the mort worship the charmion. If someone is plushy and they need the charmion then the charmion worship the mort. If someone dally the mort then the mort dally the dewey. If someone is lacelike and they like the charmion then the charmion dally the dewey. The charmion is not plushy.", "logic": "\nReliable(mort)\nPlushy(mort)\nExpiative(mort)\nEngild(mort, charmion)\nDally(mort, dewey)\nWorship(mort, dewey)\nExpiative(charmion)\nDally(charmion, mort)\nWorship(charmion, dewey)\nPlushy(dewey)\nExpiative(dewey)\nDally(dewey, charmion)\nforall x (Dally(x, mort) -> Engild(x, mort))\nforall x (Worship(x, mort) -> Lacelike(mort))\nforall x (Engild(x, mort) -> Worship(mort, charmion))\nforall x (Plushy(x) and Dally(x, charmion) -> Worship(charmion, mort))\nforall x (Dally(x, mort) -> Dally(mort, dewey))\nforall x (Lacelike(x) and Engild(x, charmion) -> Dally(charmion, dewey))\n\nnot Plushy(charmion)\n\nnot Plushy(charmion) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The peggi is faucal. The peggi is expendable. The peggi is duplicable. The peggi amass the prudence. The peggi emcee the nico. The peggi flyfish the nico. The prudence is duplicable. The prudence emcee the peggi. The prudence flyfish the nico. The nico is expendable. The nico is duplicable. The nico emcee the prudence. If someone emcee the peggi then they like the peggi. If someone flyfish the peggi then the peggi is bilinear. If someone amass the peggi then the peggi flyfish the prudence. If someone is expendable and they need the prudence then the prudence flyfish the peggi. If someone emcee the peggi then the peggi emcee the nico. If someone is bilinear and they like the prudence then the prudence emcee the nico. The peggi flyfish the peggi.", "logic": "\nFaucal(peggi)\nExpendable(peggi)\nDuplicable(peggi)\nAmass(peggi, prudence)\nEmcee(peggi, nico)\nFlyfish(peggi, nico)\nDuplicable(prudence)\nEmcee(prudence, peggi)\nFlyfish(prudence, nico)\nExpendable(nico)\nDuplicable(nico)\nEmcee(nico, prudence)\nforall x (Emcee(x, peggi) -> Amass(x, peggi))\nforall x (Flyfish(x, peggi) -> Bilinear(peggi))\nforall x (Amass(x, peggi) -> Flyfish(peggi, prudence))\nforall x (Expendable(x) and Emcee(x, prudence) -> Flyfish(prudence, peggi))\nforall x (Emcee(x, peggi) -> Emcee(peggi, nico))\nforall x (Bilinear(x) and Amass(x, prudence) -> Emcee(prudence, nico))\n\nFlyfish(peggi, peggi)\n\nFlyfish(peggi, peggi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The madelin is monotypic. The madelin is sheer. The madelin is albinotic. The madelin smudge the edi. The madelin misadvise the worth. The madelin opacify the worth. The edi is albinotic. The edi misadvise the madelin. The edi opacify the worth. The worth is sheer. The worth is albinotic. The worth misadvise the edi. If someone misadvise the madelin then they like the madelin. If someone opacify the madelin then the madelin is augitic. If someone smudge the madelin then the madelin opacify the edi. If someone is sheer and they need the edi then the edi opacify the madelin. If someone misadvise the madelin then the madelin misadvise the worth. If someone is augitic and they like the edi then the edi misadvise the worth. The edi does not like the edi.", "logic": "\nMonotypic(madelin)\nSheer(madelin)\nAlbinotic(madelin)\nSmudge(madelin, edi)\nMisadvise(madelin, worth)\nOpacify(madelin, worth)\nAlbinotic(edi)\nMisadvise(edi, madelin)\nOpacify(edi, worth)\nSheer(worth)\nAlbinotic(worth)\nMisadvise(worth, edi)\nforall x (Misadvise(x, madelin) -> Smudge(x, madelin))\nforall x (Opacify(x, madelin) -> Augitic(madelin))\nforall x (Smudge(x, madelin) -> Opacify(madelin, edi))\nforall x (Sheer(x) and Misadvise(x, edi) -> Opacify(edi, madelin))\nforall x (Misadvise(x, madelin) -> Misadvise(madelin, worth))\nforall x (Augitic(x) and Smudge(x, edi) -> Misadvise(edi, worth))\n\nnot Smudge(edi, edi)\n\nnot Smudge(edi, edi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "The bren is ghanian. The bren is ordinal. The bren is manly. The bren disburse the price. The bren mingle the jordon. The bren reuse the jordon. The price is manly. The price mingle the bren. The price reuse the jordon. The jordon is ordinal. The jordon is manly. The jordon mingle the price. If someone mingle the bren then they like the bren. If someone reuse the bren then the bren is acrogenic. If someone disburse the bren then the bren reuse the price. If someone is ordinal and they need the price then the price reuse the bren. If someone mingle the bren then the bren mingle the jordon. If someone is acrogenic and they like the price then the price mingle the jordon. The price is acrogenic.", "logic": "\nGhanian(bren)\nOrdinal(bren)\nManly(bren)\nDisburse(bren, price)\nMingle(bren, jordon)\nReuse(bren, jordon)\nManly(price)\nMingle(price, bren)\nReuse(price, jordon)\nOrdinal(jordon)\nManly(jordon)\nMingle(jordon, price)\nforall x (Mingle(x, bren) -> Disburse(x, bren))\nforall x (Reuse(x, bren) -> Acrogenic(bren))\nforall x (Disburse(x, bren) -> Reuse(bren, price))\nforall x (Ordinal(x) and Mingle(x, price) -> Reuse(price, bren))\nforall x (Mingle(x, bren) -> Mingle(bren, jordon))\nforall x (Acrogenic(x) and Disburse(x, price) -> Mingle(price, jordon))\n\nAcrogenic(price)\n\nAcrogenic(price) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-237"} {"premises": "Dina is nonlethal. Roosevelt is promising. Roosevelt is literal. If Roosevelt is promising and Roosevelt is literal then Roosevelt is glassed. If someone is discarded and uncordial then they are literal. Young people are discarded. Kind people are uncordial. Young, scrubby people are nonlethal. If Roosevelt is glassed then Roosevelt is scrubby. Roosevelt is promising.", "logic": "\nNonlethal(dina)\nPromising(roosevelt)\nLiteral(roosevelt)\nPromising(roosevelt) and Literal(roosevelt) -> Glassed(roosevelt)\nforall x (Discarded(x) and Uncordial(x) -> Literal(x))\nforall x (Uncordial(x) -> Discarded(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) -> Uncordial(x))\nforall x (Uncordial(x) and Scrubby(x) -> Nonlethal(x))\nGlassed(roosevelt) -> Scrubby(roosevelt)\n\nPromising(roosevelt)\n\ntherefore Promising(roosevelt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Chiarra is beseeching. Cecil is cachectic. Cecil is agile. If Cecil is cachectic and Cecil is agile then Cecil is peaceful. If someone is uncomplete and avellan then they are agile. Young people are uncomplete. Kind people are avellan. Young, scalable people are beseeching. If Cecil is peaceful then Cecil is scalable. Chiarra is not beseeching.", "logic": "\nBeseeching(chiarra)\nCachectic(cecil)\nAgile(cecil)\nCachectic(cecil) and Agile(cecil) -> Peaceful(cecil)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Avellan(x) -> Agile(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) -> Uncomplete(x))\nforall x (Agile(x) -> Avellan(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and Scalable(x) -> Beseeching(x))\nPeaceful(cecil) -> Scalable(cecil)\n\nnot Beseeching(chiarra)\n\ntherefore Beseeching(chiarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Morgan is taboo. Lily is doughy. Lily is bated. If Lily is doughy and Lily is bated then Lily is gilled. If someone is adapted and confusable then they are bated. Young people are adapted. Kind people are confusable. Young, broached people are taboo. If Lily is gilled then Lily is broached. Lily is gilled.", "logic": "\nTaboo(morgan)\nDoughy(lily)\nBated(lily)\nDoughy(lily) and Bated(lily) -> Gilled(lily)\nforall x (Adapted(x) and Confusable(x) -> Bated(x))\nforall x (Confusable(x) -> Adapted(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Confusable(x))\nforall x (Confusable(x) and Broached(x) -> Taboo(x))\nGilled(lily) -> Broached(lily)\n\nGilled(lily)\n\nDoughy(lily) and Bated(lily) and Doughy(lily) and Bated(lily) -> Gilled(lily) -> therefore Gilled(lily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Vikkie is privileged. Shelley is untilled. Shelley is fake. If Shelley is untilled and Shelley is fake then Shelley is hereditary. If someone is driven and boughed then they are fake. Young people are driven. Kind people are boughed. Young, nocent people are privileged. If Shelley is hereditary then Shelley is nocent. Shelley is not boughed.", "logic": "\nPrivileged(vikkie)\nUntilled(shelley)\nFake(shelley)\nUntilled(shelley) and Fake(shelley) -> Hereditary(shelley)\nforall x (Driven(x) and Boughed(x) -> Fake(x))\nforall x (Boughed(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Fake(x) -> Boughed(x))\nforall x (Boughed(x) and Nocent(x) -> Privileged(x))\nHereditary(shelley) -> Nocent(shelley)\n\nnot Boughed(shelley)\n\nFake(shelley) and forall x (Fake(x) -> Boughed(x)) -> therefore Boughed(shelley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Wilfrid is algolagnic. Zonda is migratory. Zonda is zymolytic. If Zonda is migratory and Zonda is zymolytic then Zonda is skyward. If someone is like and cleanly then they are zymolytic. Young people are like. Kind people are cleanly. Young, adult people are algolagnic. If Zonda is skyward then Zonda is adult. Zonda is adult.", "logic": "\nAlgolagnic(wilfrid)\nMigratory(zonda)\nZymolytic(zonda)\nMigratory(zonda) and Zymolytic(zonda) -> Skyward(zonda)\nforall x (Like(x) and Cleanly(x) -> Zymolytic(x))\nforall x (Cleanly(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Zymolytic(x) -> Cleanly(x))\nforall x (Cleanly(x) and Adult(x) -> Algolagnic(x))\nSkyward(zonda) -> Adult(zonda)\n\nAdult(zonda)\n\nMigratory(zonda) and Zymolytic(zonda) and Migratory(zonda) and Zymolytic(zonda) -> Skyward(zonda) -> therefore Skyward(zonda) Skyward(zonda) and Skyward(zonda) -> Adult(zonda) -> therefore Adult(zonda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Armand is extended. Steffi is gilbertian. Steffi is phrasal. If Steffi is gilbertian and Steffi is phrasal then Steffi is steepish. If someone is pycnotic and prevenient then they are phrasal. Young people are pycnotic. Kind people are prevenient. Young, dolomitic people are extended. If Steffi is steepish then Steffi is dolomitic. Steffi is not pycnotic.", "logic": "\nExtended(armand)\nGilbertian(steffi)\nPhrasal(steffi)\nGilbertian(steffi) and Phrasal(steffi) -> Steepish(steffi)\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) and Prevenient(x) -> Phrasal(x))\nforall x (Prevenient(x) -> Pycnotic(x))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Prevenient(x) and Dolomitic(x) -> Extended(x))\nSteepish(steffi) -> Dolomitic(steffi)\n\nnot Pycnotic(steffi)\n\nPhrasal(steffi) and forall x (Phrasal(x) -> Prevenient(x)) -> therefore Prevenient(steffi) Prevenient(steffi) and forall x (Prevenient(x) -> Pycnotic(x)) -> therefore Pycnotic(steffi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Easter is beatific. Geneva is sophistic. Geneva is conformist. If Geneva is sophistic and Geneva is conformist then Geneva is magnetised. If someone is ovular and obstructed then they are conformist. Young people are ovular. Kind people are obstructed. Young, bubbly people are beatific. If Geneva is magnetised then Geneva is bubbly. Geneva is beatific.", "logic": "\nBeatific(easter)\nSophistic(geneva)\nConformist(geneva)\nSophistic(geneva) and Conformist(geneva) -> Magnetised(geneva)\nforall x (Ovular(x) and Obstructed(x) -> Conformist(x))\nforall x (Obstructed(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Conformist(x) -> Obstructed(x))\nforall x (Obstructed(x) and Bubbly(x) -> Beatific(x))\nMagnetised(geneva) -> Bubbly(geneva)\n\nBeatific(geneva)\n\nConformist(geneva) and forall x (Conformist(x) -> Obstructed(x)) -> therefore Obstructed(geneva) Sophistic(geneva) and Conformist(geneva) and Sophistic(geneva) and Conformist(geneva) -> Magnetised(geneva) -> therefore Magnetised(geneva) Magnetised(geneva) and Magnetised(geneva) -> Bubbly(geneva) -> therefore Bubbly(geneva) Obstructed(geneva) and Bubbly(geneva) and forall x (Obstructed(x) and Bubbly(x) -> Beatific(x)) -> therefore Beatific(geneva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Sissie is eutherian. Mohammed is beforehand. Mohammed is spacey. If Mohammed is beforehand and Mohammed is spacey then Mohammed is apraxic. If someone is managerial and affixed then they are spacey. Young people are managerial. Kind people are affixed. Young, segregated people are eutherian. If Mohammed is apraxic then Mohammed is segregated. Mohammed is not eutherian.", "logic": "\nEutherian(sissie)\nBeforehand(mohammed)\nSpacey(mohammed)\nBeforehand(mohammed) and Spacey(mohammed) -> Apraxic(mohammed)\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Affixed(x) -> Spacey(x))\nforall x (Affixed(x) -> Managerial(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Affixed(x) and Segregated(x) -> Eutherian(x))\nApraxic(mohammed) -> Segregated(mohammed)\n\nnot Eutherian(mohammed)\n\nSpacey(mohammed) and forall x (Spacey(x) -> Affixed(x)) -> therefore Affixed(mohammed) Beforehand(mohammed) and Spacey(mohammed) and Beforehand(mohammed) and Spacey(mohammed) -> Apraxic(mohammed) -> therefore Apraxic(mohammed) Apraxic(mohammed) and Apraxic(mohammed) -> Segregated(mohammed) -> therefore Segregated(mohammed) Affixed(mohammed) and Segregated(mohammed) and forall x (Affixed(x) and Segregated(x) -> Eutherian(x)) -> therefore Eutherian(mohammed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Vannie is spurned. Ambrosio is salutary. Ambrosio is nullified. If Ambrosio is salutary and Ambrosio is nullified then Ambrosio is missed. If someone is trepid and unfair then they are nullified. Young people are trepid. Kind people are unfair. Young, unneeded people are spurned. If Ambrosio is missed then Ambrosio is unneeded. Vannie is not unfair.", "logic": "\nSpurned(vannie)\nSalutary(ambrosio)\nNullified(ambrosio)\nSalutary(ambrosio) and Nullified(ambrosio) -> Missed(ambrosio)\nforall x (Trepid(x) and Unfair(x) -> Nullified(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) -> Trepid(x))\nforall x (Nullified(x) -> Unfair(x))\nforall x (Unfair(x) and Unneeded(x) -> Spurned(x))\nMissed(ambrosio) -> Unneeded(ambrosio)\n\nnot Unfair(vannie)\n\nforall x (Nullified(x) -> Unfair(x)) <- forall x (Trepid(x) and Unfair(x) -> Nullified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Barbi is overnice. Paulette is isentropic. Paulette is jiggered. If Paulette is isentropic and Paulette is jiggered then Paulette is impeding. If someone is eradicable and ungathered then they are jiggered. Young people are eradicable. Kind people are ungathered. Young, putative people are overnice. If Paulette is impeding then Paulette is putative. Barbi is eradicable.", "logic": "\nOvernice(barbi)\nIsentropic(paulette)\nJiggered(paulette)\nIsentropic(paulette) and Jiggered(paulette) -> Impeding(paulette)\nforall x (Eradicable(x) and Ungathered(x) -> Jiggered(x))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) -> Eradicable(x))\nforall x (Jiggered(x) -> Ungathered(x))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) and Putative(x) -> Overnice(x))\nImpeding(paulette) -> Putative(paulette)\n\nEradicable(barbi)\n\nforall x (Ungathered(x) -> Eradicable(x)) <- forall x (Jiggered(x) -> Ungathered(x)) <- forall x (Eradicable(x) and Ungathered(x) -> Jiggered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Adriane is apocrine. Concordia is westbound. Concordia is imprecise. If Concordia is westbound and Concordia is imprecise then Concordia is despoiled. If someone is disused and saxicolous then they are imprecise. Young people are disused. Kind people are saxicolous. Young, suspect people are apocrine. If Concordia is despoiled then Concordia is suspect. Adriane is not imprecise.", "logic": "\nApocrine(adriane)\nWestbound(concordia)\nImprecise(concordia)\nWestbound(concordia) and Imprecise(concordia) -> Despoiled(concordia)\nforall x (Disused(x) and Saxicolous(x) -> Imprecise(x))\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) -> Disused(x))\nforall x (Imprecise(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Suspect(x) -> Apocrine(x))\nDespoiled(concordia) -> Suspect(concordia)\n\nnot Imprecise(adriane)\n\nforall x (Disused(x) and Saxicolous(x) -> Imprecise(x)) <- forall x (Imprecise(x) -> Saxicolous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Cloris is unharmed. Corinna is unchecked. Corinna is foregoing. If Corinna is unchecked and Corinna is foregoing then Corinna is sizeable. If someone is westbound and womanly then they are foregoing. Young people are westbound. Kind people are womanly. Young, billiard people are unharmed. If Corinna is sizeable then Corinna is billiard. Cloris is sizeable.", "logic": "\nUnharmed(cloris)\nUnchecked(corinna)\nForegoing(corinna)\nUnchecked(corinna) and Foregoing(corinna) -> Sizeable(corinna)\nforall x (Westbound(x) and Womanly(x) -> Foregoing(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Westbound(x))\nforall x (Foregoing(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) and Billiard(x) -> Unharmed(x))\nSizeable(corinna) -> Billiard(corinna)\n\nSizeable(cloris)\n\nSizeable(cloris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Dona is dismissive. Minerva is neotenous. Minerva is frosted. If Minerva is neotenous and Minerva is frosted then Minerva is fictile. If someone is anabatic and titular then they are frosted. Young people are anabatic. Kind people are titular. Young, stinking people are dismissive. If Minerva is fictile then Minerva is stinking. Dona is not stinking.", "logic": "\nDismissive(dona)\nNeotenous(minerva)\nFrosted(minerva)\nNeotenous(minerva) and Frosted(minerva) -> Fictile(minerva)\nforall x (Anabatic(x) and Titular(x) -> Frosted(x))\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nforall x (Frosted(x) -> Titular(x))\nforall x (Titular(x) and Stinking(x) -> Dismissive(x))\nFictile(minerva) -> Stinking(minerva)\n\nnot Stinking(dona)\n\nnot Stinking(dona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Kourtney is offended. Lola is bobtailed. Lola is infertile. If Lola is bobtailed and Lola is infertile then Lola is scruffy. If someone is adherent and deflated then they are infertile. Young people are adherent. Kind people are deflated. Young, improbable people are offended. If Lola is scruffy then Lola is improbable. Kourtney is bobtailed.", "logic": "\nOffended(kourtney)\nBobtailed(lola)\nInfertile(lola)\nBobtailed(lola) and Infertile(lola) -> Scruffy(lola)\nforall x (Adherent(x) and Deflated(x) -> Infertile(x))\nforall x (Deflated(x) -> Adherent(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) -> Deflated(x))\nforall x (Deflated(x) and Improbable(x) -> Offended(x))\nScruffy(lola) -> Improbable(lola)\n\nBobtailed(kourtney)\n\nBobtailed(kourtney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1818"} {"premises": "Nadya is gastric. Nadya is sidearm. Nadya is nationwide. Nadya is pert. Nadya is beneficial. Nadya is coquettish. Nadya is unknowable. Cori is nationwide. Cori is beneficial. Cori is unknowable. Kind, unknowable people are gastric. If Nadya is gastric and Nadya is pert then Nadya is sidearm. All nationwide, coquettish people are gastric. If someone is pert then they are coquettish. All gastric, unknowable people are pert. If someone is beneficial then they are coquettish. Nadya is beneficial.", "logic": "\nGastric(nadya)\nSidearm(nadya)\nNationwide(nadya)\nPert(nadya)\nBeneficial(nadya)\nCoquettish(nadya)\nUnknowable(nadya)\nNationwide(cori)\nBeneficial(cori)\nUnknowable(cori)\nforall x (Pert(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Gastric(x))\nGastric(nadya) and Pert(nadya) -> Sidearm(nadya)\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and Coquettish(x) -> Gastric(x))\nforall x (Pert(x) -> Coquettish(x))\nforall x (Gastric(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Pert(x))\nforall x (Beneficial(x) -> Coquettish(x))\n\nBeneficial(nadya)\n\ntherefore Beneficial(nadya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Ferd is meaning. Ferd is geologic. Ferd is about. Ferd is coveted. Ferd is epiphysial. Ferd is diagonal. Ferd is foaming. Millie is about. Millie is epiphysial. Millie is foaming. Kind, foaming people are meaning. If Ferd is meaning and Ferd is coveted then Ferd is geologic. All about, diagonal people are meaning. If someone is coveted then they are diagonal. All meaning, foaming people are coveted. If someone is epiphysial then they are diagonal. Millie is not about.", "logic": "\nMeaning(ferd)\nGeologic(ferd)\nAbout(ferd)\nCoveted(ferd)\nEpiphysial(ferd)\nDiagonal(ferd)\nFoaming(ferd)\nAbout(millie)\nEpiphysial(millie)\nFoaming(millie)\nforall x (Coveted(x) and Foaming(x) -> Meaning(x))\nMeaning(ferd) and Coveted(ferd) -> Geologic(ferd)\nforall x (About(x) and Diagonal(x) -> Meaning(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Meaning(x) and Foaming(x) -> Coveted(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) -> Diagonal(x))\n\nnot About(millie)\n\ntherefore About(millie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Rosmunda is salable. Rosmunda is snaky. Rosmunda is sloped. Rosmunda is licenced. Rosmunda is carinated. Rosmunda is unctuous. Rosmunda is ariose. Alice is sloped. Alice is carinated. Alice is ariose. Kind, ariose people are salable. If Rosmunda is salable and Rosmunda is licenced then Rosmunda is snaky. All sloped, unctuous people are salable. If someone is licenced then they are unctuous. All salable, ariose people are licenced. If someone is carinated then they are unctuous. Alice is unctuous.", "logic": "\nSalable(rosmunda)\nSnaky(rosmunda)\nSloped(rosmunda)\nLicenced(rosmunda)\nCarinated(rosmunda)\nUnctuous(rosmunda)\nAriose(rosmunda)\nSloped(alice)\nCarinated(alice)\nAriose(alice)\nforall x (Licenced(x) and Ariose(x) -> Salable(x))\nSalable(rosmunda) and Licenced(rosmunda) -> Snaky(rosmunda)\nforall x (Sloped(x) and Unctuous(x) -> Salable(x))\nforall x (Licenced(x) -> Unctuous(x))\nforall x (Salable(x) and Ariose(x) -> Licenced(x))\nforall x (Carinated(x) -> Unctuous(x))\n\nUnctuous(alice)\n\nCarinated(alice) and forall x (Carinated(x) -> Unctuous(x)) -> therefore Unctuous(alice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Manuel is diffusive. Manuel is avellan. Manuel is motivative. Manuel is tutelar. Manuel is tensional. Manuel is undressed. Manuel is viewless. Guendolen is motivative. Guendolen is tensional. Guendolen is viewless. Kind, viewless people are diffusive. If Manuel is diffusive and Manuel is tutelar then Manuel is avellan. All motivative, undressed people are diffusive. If someone is tutelar then they are undressed. All diffusive, viewless people are tutelar. If someone is tensional then they are undressed. Guendolen is not undressed.", "logic": "\nDiffusive(manuel)\nAvellan(manuel)\nMotivative(manuel)\nTutelar(manuel)\nTensional(manuel)\nUndressed(manuel)\nViewless(manuel)\nMotivative(guendolen)\nTensional(guendolen)\nViewless(guendolen)\nforall x (Tutelar(x) and Viewless(x) -> Diffusive(x))\nDiffusive(manuel) and Tutelar(manuel) -> Avellan(manuel)\nforall x (Motivative(x) and Undressed(x) -> Diffusive(x))\nforall x (Tutelar(x) -> Undressed(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) and Viewless(x) -> Tutelar(x))\nforall x (Tensional(x) -> Undressed(x))\n\nnot Undressed(guendolen)\n\nTensional(guendolen) and forall x (Tensional(x) -> Undressed(x)) -> therefore Undressed(guendolen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Reuben is hedonistic. Reuben is flagitious. Reuben is palatial. Reuben is inborn. Reuben is unarmed. Reuben is verbatim. Reuben is beady. Ericha is palatial. Ericha is unarmed. Ericha is beady. Kind, beady people are hedonistic. If Reuben is hedonistic and Reuben is inborn then Reuben is flagitious. All palatial, verbatim people are hedonistic. If someone is inborn then they are verbatim. All hedonistic, beady people are inborn. If someone is unarmed then they are verbatim. Ericha is hedonistic.", "logic": "\nHedonistic(reuben)\nFlagitious(reuben)\nPalatial(reuben)\nInborn(reuben)\nUnarmed(reuben)\nVerbatim(reuben)\nBeady(reuben)\nPalatial(ericha)\nUnarmed(ericha)\nBeady(ericha)\nforall x (Inborn(x) and Beady(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\nHedonistic(reuben) and Inborn(reuben) -> Flagitious(reuben)\nforall x (Palatial(x) and Verbatim(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Hedonistic(x) and Beady(x) -> Inborn(x))\nforall x (Unarmed(x) -> Verbatim(x))\n\nHedonistic(ericha)\n\nUnarmed(ericha) and forall x (Unarmed(x) -> Verbatim(x)) -> therefore Verbatim(ericha) Palatial(ericha) and Verbatim(ericha) and forall x (Palatial(x) and Verbatim(x) -> Hedonistic(x)) -> therefore Hedonistic(ericha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Dorolice is endovenous. Dorolice is grilled. Dorolice is midwestern. Dorolice is homelike. Dorolice is converted. Dorolice is bosnian. Dorolice is tarsal. Mustafa is midwestern. Mustafa is converted. Mustafa is tarsal. Kind, tarsal people are endovenous. If Dorolice is endovenous and Dorolice is homelike then Dorolice is grilled. All midwestern, bosnian people are endovenous. If someone is homelike then they are bosnian. All endovenous, tarsal people are homelike. If someone is converted then they are bosnian. Mustafa is not endovenous.", "logic": "\nEndovenous(dorolice)\nGrilled(dorolice)\nMidwestern(dorolice)\nHomelike(dorolice)\nConverted(dorolice)\nBosnian(dorolice)\nTarsal(dorolice)\nMidwestern(mustafa)\nConverted(mustafa)\nTarsal(mustafa)\nforall x (Homelike(x) and Tarsal(x) -> Endovenous(x))\nEndovenous(dorolice) and Homelike(dorolice) -> Grilled(dorolice)\nforall x (Midwestern(x) and Bosnian(x) -> Endovenous(x))\nforall x (Homelike(x) -> Bosnian(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Tarsal(x) -> Homelike(x))\nforall x (Converted(x) -> Bosnian(x))\n\nnot Endovenous(mustafa)\n\nConverted(mustafa) and forall x (Converted(x) -> Bosnian(x)) -> therefore Bosnian(mustafa) Midwestern(mustafa) and Bosnian(mustafa) and forall x (Midwestern(x) and Bosnian(x) -> Endovenous(x)) -> therefore Endovenous(mustafa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Manda is motorised. Manda is symphonic. Manda is calloused. Manda is pentatonic. Manda is unmoved. Manda is infertile. Manda is niggling. Dani is calloused. Dani is unmoved. Dani is niggling. Kind, niggling people are motorised. If Manda is motorised and Manda is pentatonic then Manda is symphonic. All calloused, infertile people are motorised. If someone is pentatonic then they are infertile. All motorised, niggling people are pentatonic. If someone is unmoved then they are infertile. Dani is pentatonic.", "logic": "\nMotorised(manda)\nSymphonic(manda)\nCalloused(manda)\nPentatonic(manda)\nUnmoved(manda)\nInfertile(manda)\nNiggling(manda)\nCalloused(dani)\nUnmoved(dani)\nNiggling(dani)\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) and Niggling(x) -> Motorised(x))\nMotorised(manda) and Pentatonic(manda) -> Symphonic(manda)\nforall x (Calloused(x) and Infertile(x) -> Motorised(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Infertile(x))\nforall x (Motorised(x) and Niggling(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Unmoved(x) -> Infertile(x))\n\nPentatonic(dani)\n\nUnmoved(dani) and forall x (Unmoved(x) -> Infertile(x)) -> therefore Infertile(dani) Calloused(dani) and Infertile(dani) and forall x (Calloused(x) and Infertile(x) -> Motorised(x)) -> therefore Motorised(dani) Motorised(dani) and Niggling(dani) and forall x (Motorised(x) and Niggling(x) -> Pentatonic(x)) -> therefore Pentatonic(dani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Christ is tiresome. Christ is danish. Christ is veteran. Christ is occasional. Christ is beetle. Christ is haematic. Christ is monotonic. Rosalynd is veteran. Rosalynd is beetle. Rosalynd is monotonic. Kind, monotonic people are tiresome. If Christ is tiresome and Christ is occasional then Christ is danish. All veteran, haematic people are tiresome. If someone is occasional then they are haematic. All tiresome, monotonic people are occasional. If someone is beetle then they are haematic. Rosalynd is not occasional.", "logic": "\nTiresome(christ)\nDanish(christ)\nVeteran(christ)\nOccasional(christ)\nBeetle(christ)\nHaematic(christ)\nMonotonic(christ)\nVeteran(rosalynd)\nBeetle(rosalynd)\nMonotonic(rosalynd)\nforall x (Occasional(x) and Monotonic(x) -> Tiresome(x))\nTiresome(christ) and Occasional(christ) -> Danish(christ)\nforall x (Veteran(x) and Haematic(x) -> Tiresome(x))\nforall x (Occasional(x) -> Haematic(x))\nforall x (Tiresome(x) and Monotonic(x) -> Occasional(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Haematic(x))\n\nnot Occasional(rosalynd)\n\nBeetle(rosalynd) and forall x (Beetle(x) -> Haematic(x)) -> therefore Haematic(rosalynd) Veteran(rosalynd) and Haematic(rosalynd) and forall x (Veteran(x) and Haematic(x) -> Tiresome(x)) -> therefore Tiresome(rosalynd) Tiresome(rosalynd) and Monotonic(rosalynd) and forall x (Tiresome(x) and Monotonic(x) -> Occasional(x)) -> therefore Occasional(rosalynd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Clemmie is sham. Corey is picaresque. Caty is not irresolute. Konstance is swingy. If Corey is sham then Corey is permissive. If someone is irresolute then they are permissive. If someone is picaresque then they are papery. If someone is sham and not snug then they are papery. Kind people are sham. If Clemmie is irresolute and Clemmie is not papery then Clemmie is swingy. Caty is not irresolute.", "logic": "\nSham(clemmie)\nPicaresque(corey)\nnot Irresolute(caty)\nSwingy(konstance)\nSham(corey) -> Permissive(corey)\nforall x (Irresolute(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) -> Papery(x))\nforall x (Sham(x) and not Snug(x) -> Papery(x))\nforall x (Papery(x) -> Sham(x))\nIrresolute(clemmie) and not Papery(clemmie) -> Swingy(clemmie)\n\nnot Irresolute(caty)\n\ntherefore not Irresolute(caty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Willis is callow. Riki is steep. Berny is not millennian. Rogers is unrepaired. If Riki is callow then Riki is jugular. If someone is millennian then they are jugular. If someone is steep then they are gnarly. If someone is callow and not subgross then they are gnarly. Kind people are callow. If Willis is millennian and Willis is not gnarly then Willis is unrepaired. Riki is not steep.", "logic": "\nCallow(willis)\nSteep(riki)\nnot Millennian(berny)\nUnrepaired(rogers)\nCallow(riki) -> Jugular(riki)\nforall x (Millennian(x) -> Jugular(x))\nforall x (Steep(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nforall x (Callow(x) and not Subgross(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Callow(x))\nMillennian(willis) and not Gnarly(willis) -> Unrepaired(willis)\n\nnot Steep(riki)\n\ntherefore Steep(riki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Avi is sniffly. Ivor is melted. Manuel is not tagged. Ravi is coalescent. If Ivor is sniffly then Ivor is terminal. If someone is tagged then they are terminal. If someone is melted then they are limiting. If someone is sniffly and not loco then they are limiting. Kind people are sniffly. If Avi is tagged and Avi is not limiting then Avi is coalescent. Ivor is limiting.", "logic": "\nSniffly(avi)\nMelted(ivor)\nnot Tagged(manuel)\nCoalescent(ravi)\nSniffly(ivor) -> Terminal(ivor)\nforall x (Tagged(x) -> Terminal(x))\nforall x (Melted(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Sniffly(x) and not Loco(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Sniffly(x))\nTagged(avi) and not Limiting(avi) -> Coalescent(avi)\n\nLimiting(ivor)\n\nMelted(ivor) and forall x (Melted(x) -> Limiting(x)) -> therefore Limiting(ivor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Elva is renowned. Catrina is anamnestic. Carlton is not flamboyant. Fionna is straying. If Catrina is renowned then Catrina is petrous. If someone is flamboyant then they are petrous. If someone is anamnestic then they are pithy. If someone is renowned and not corruptive then they are pithy. Kind people are renowned. If Elva is flamboyant and Elva is not pithy then Elva is straying. Catrina is not pithy.", "logic": "\nRenowned(elva)\nAnamnestic(catrina)\nnot Flamboyant(carlton)\nStraying(fionna)\nRenowned(catrina) -> Petrous(catrina)\nforall x (Flamboyant(x) -> Petrous(x))\nforall x (Anamnestic(x) -> Pithy(x))\nforall x (Renowned(x) and not Corruptive(x) -> Pithy(x))\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> Renowned(x))\nFlamboyant(elva) and not Pithy(elva) -> Straying(elva)\n\nnot Pithy(catrina)\n\nAnamnestic(catrina) and forall x (Anamnestic(x) -> Pithy(x)) -> therefore Pithy(catrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Roosevelt is anhydrous. Waylan is heartless. Margalo is not petalless. Lethia is champleve. If Waylan is anhydrous then Waylan is cleavable. If someone is petalless then they are cleavable. If someone is heartless then they are unbodied. If someone is anhydrous and not trancelike then they are unbodied. Kind people are anhydrous. If Roosevelt is petalless and Roosevelt is not unbodied then Roosevelt is champleve. Waylan is anhydrous.", "logic": "\nAnhydrous(roosevelt)\nHeartless(waylan)\nnot Petalless(margalo)\nChampleve(lethia)\nAnhydrous(waylan) -> Cleavable(waylan)\nforall x (Petalless(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Heartless(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Anhydrous(x) and not Trancelike(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Unbodied(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\nPetalless(roosevelt) and not Unbodied(roosevelt) -> Champleve(roosevelt)\n\nAnhydrous(waylan)\n\nHeartless(waylan) and forall x (Heartless(x) -> Unbodied(x)) -> therefore Unbodied(waylan) Unbodied(waylan) and forall x (Unbodied(x) -> Anhydrous(x)) -> therefore Anhydrous(waylan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Moe is herbal. Aurelia is floaty. Idaline is not anaglyptic. Linell is unbranded. If Aurelia is herbal then Aurelia is underarm. If someone is anaglyptic then they are underarm. If someone is floaty then they are vasomotor. If someone is herbal and not limitless then they are vasomotor. Kind people are herbal. If Moe is anaglyptic and Moe is not vasomotor then Moe is unbranded. Aurelia is not herbal.", "logic": "\nHerbal(moe)\nFloaty(aurelia)\nnot Anaglyptic(idaline)\nUnbranded(linell)\nHerbal(aurelia) -> Underarm(aurelia)\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Underarm(x))\nforall x (Floaty(x) -> Vasomotor(x))\nforall x (Herbal(x) and not Limitless(x) -> Vasomotor(x))\nforall x (Vasomotor(x) -> Herbal(x))\nAnaglyptic(moe) and not Vasomotor(moe) -> Unbranded(moe)\n\nnot Herbal(aurelia)\n\nFloaty(aurelia) and forall x (Floaty(x) -> Vasomotor(x)) -> therefore Vasomotor(aurelia) Vasomotor(aurelia) and forall x (Vasomotor(x) -> Herbal(x)) -> therefore Herbal(aurelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Cameron is accurate. Marietta is vinaceous. Gussi is not arbitrable. Ginnie is confiding. If Marietta is accurate then Marietta is cutaneous. If someone is arbitrable then they are cutaneous. If someone is vinaceous then they are charming. If someone is accurate and not biracial then they are charming. Kind people are accurate. If Cameron is arbitrable and Cameron is not charming then Cameron is confiding. Marietta is cutaneous.", "logic": "\nAccurate(cameron)\nVinaceous(marietta)\nnot Arbitrable(gussi)\nConfiding(ginnie)\nAccurate(marietta) -> Cutaneous(marietta)\nforall x (Arbitrable(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nforall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Charming(x))\nforall x (Accurate(x) and not Biracial(x) -> Charming(x))\nforall x (Charming(x) -> Accurate(x))\nArbitrable(cameron) and not Charming(cameron) -> Confiding(cameron)\n\nCutaneous(marietta)\n\nVinaceous(marietta) and forall x (Vinaceous(x) -> Charming(x)) -> therefore Charming(marietta) Charming(marietta) and forall x (Charming(x) -> Accurate(x)) -> therefore Accurate(marietta) Accurate(marietta) and Accurate(marietta) -> Cutaneous(marietta) -> therefore Cutaneous(marietta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Shem is equipped. Blinnie is allomerous. Candra is not untold. Norris is carbuncled. If Blinnie is equipped then Blinnie is sacred. If someone is untold then they are sacred. If someone is allomerous then they are lovesome. If someone is equipped and not umbellate then they are lovesome. Kind people are equipped. If Shem is untold and Shem is not lovesome then Shem is carbuncled. Blinnie is not sacred.", "logic": "\nEquipped(shem)\nAllomerous(blinnie)\nnot Untold(candra)\nCarbuncled(norris)\nEquipped(blinnie) -> Sacred(blinnie)\nforall x (Untold(x) -> Sacred(x))\nforall x (Allomerous(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Equipped(x) and not Umbellate(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) -> Equipped(x))\nUntold(shem) and not Lovesome(shem) -> Carbuncled(shem)\n\nnot Sacred(blinnie)\n\nAllomerous(blinnie) and forall x (Allomerous(x) -> Lovesome(x)) -> therefore Lovesome(blinnie) Lovesome(blinnie) and forall x (Lovesome(x) -> Equipped(x)) -> therefore Equipped(blinnie) Equipped(blinnie) and Equipped(blinnie) -> Sacred(blinnie) -> therefore Sacred(blinnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Lennie is warning. Merwin is starved. Shep is not seedless. Raina is ergonomic. If Merwin is warning then Merwin is willing. If someone is seedless then they are willing. If someone is starved then they are haggard. If someone is warning and not vindictive then they are haggard. Kind people are warning. If Lennie is seedless and Lennie is not haggard then Lennie is ergonomic. Lennie is not willing.", "logic": "\nWarning(lennie)\nStarved(merwin)\nnot Seedless(shep)\nErgonomic(raina)\nWarning(merwin) -> Willing(merwin)\nforall x (Seedless(x) -> Willing(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and not Vindictive(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Warning(x))\nSeedless(lennie) and not Haggard(lennie) -> Ergonomic(lennie)\n\nnot Willing(lennie)\n\nforall x (Seedless(x) -> Willing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Marie is flashy. Ehud is inexact. Godart is not garbled. Horatius is amendable. If Ehud is flashy then Ehud is must. If someone is garbled then they are must. If someone is inexact then they are elderly. If someone is flashy and not huddled then they are elderly. Kind people are flashy. If Marie is garbled and Marie is not elderly then Marie is amendable. Horatius is flashy.", "logic": "\nFlashy(marie)\nInexact(ehud)\nnot Garbled(godart)\nAmendable(horatius)\nFlashy(ehud) -> Must(ehud)\nforall x (Garbled(x) -> Must(x))\nforall x (Inexact(x) -> Elderly(x))\nforall x (Flashy(x) and not Huddled(x) -> Elderly(x))\nforall x (Elderly(x) -> Flashy(x))\nGarbled(marie) and not Elderly(marie) -> Amendable(marie)\n\nFlashy(horatius)\n\nforall x (Elderly(x) -> Flashy(x)) <- forall x (Inexact(x) -> Elderly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Filbert is prostyle. Zared is thyroidal. Gordan is not sweeping. Aurelie is backhand. If Zared is prostyle then Zared is diametral. If someone is sweeping then they are diametral. If someone is thyroidal then they are anabolic. If someone is prostyle and not monovular then they are anabolic. Kind people are prostyle. If Filbert is sweeping and Filbert is not anabolic then Filbert is backhand. Gordan is not prostyle.", "logic": "\nProstyle(filbert)\nThyroidal(zared)\nnot Sweeping(gordan)\nBackhand(aurelie)\nProstyle(zared) -> Diametral(zared)\nforall x (Sweeping(x) -> Diametral(x))\nforall x (Thyroidal(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Prostyle(x) and not Monovular(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Anabolic(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nSweeping(filbert) and not Anabolic(filbert) -> Backhand(filbert)\n\nnot Prostyle(gordan)\n\nforall x (Anabolic(x) -> Prostyle(x)) <- forall x (Thyroidal(x) -> Anabolic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Tricia is prosodic. Celle is lusterless. Stephen is not monotonic. Sophia is thematic. If Celle is prosodic then Celle is catchy. If someone is monotonic then they are catchy. If someone is lusterless then they are anamorphic. If someone is prosodic and not forgetful then they are anamorphic. Kind people are prosodic. If Tricia is monotonic and Tricia is not anamorphic then Tricia is thematic. Stephen is anamorphic.", "logic": "\nProsodic(tricia)\nLusterless(celle)\nnot Monotonic(stephen)\nThematic(sophia)\nProsodic(celle) -> Catchy(celle)\nforall x (Monotonic(x) -> Catchy(x))\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nforall x (Prosodic(x) and not Forgetful(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) -> Prosodic(x))\nMonotonic(tricia) and not Anamorphic(tricia) -> Thematic(tricia)\n\nAnamorphic(stephen)\n\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Anamorphic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Moyna is irrelevant. Kacy is eastward. Tedda is not merged. Jeanie is discoid. If Kacy is irrelevant then Kacy is oversexed. If someone is merged then they are oversexed. If someone is eastward then they are witless. If someone is irrelevant and not autistic then they are witless. Kind people are irrelevant. If Moyna is merged and Moyna is not witless then Moyna is discoid. Moyna is not merged.", "logic": "\nIrrelevant(moyna)\nEastward(kacy)\nnot Merged(tedda)\nDiscoid(jeanie)\nIrrelevant(kacy) -> Oversexed(kacy)\nforall x (Merged(x) -> Oversexed(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Witless(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) and not Autistic(x) -> Witless(x))\nforall x (Witless(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\nMerged(moyna) and not Witless(moyna) -> Discoid(moyna)\n\nnot Merged(moyna)\n\nnot Merged(moyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Ruddie is buggy. Binny is barricaded. Silvia is not adsorbate. Odin is moderne. If Binny is buggy then Binny is fugacious. If someone is adsorbate then they are fugacious. If someone is barricaded then they are molded. If someone is buggy and not dental then they are molded. Kind people are buggy. If Ruddie is adsorbate and Ruddie is not molded then Ruddie is moderne. Odin is dental.", "logic": "\nBuggy(ruddie)\nBarricaded(binny)\nnot Adsorbate(silvia)\nModerne(odin)\nBuggy(binny) -> Fugacious(binny)\nforall x (Adsorbate(x) -> Fugacious(x))\nforall x (Barricaded(x) -> Molded(x))\nforall x (Buggy(x) and not Dental(x) -> Molded(x))\nforall x (Molded(x) -> Buggy(x))\nAdsorbate(ruddie) and not Molded(ruddie) -> Moderne(ruddie)\n\nDental(odin)\n\nDental(odin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Arie is unshapely. Blythe is drugged. Karly is not reconciled. Stella is crumpled. If Blythe is unshapely then Blythe is mediate. If someone is reconciled then they are mediate. If someone is drugged then they are ethnic. If someone is unshapely and not rimmed then they are ethnic. Kind people are unshapely. If Arie is reconciled and Arie is not ethnic then Arie is crumpled. Arie is not drugged.", "logic": "\nUnshapely(arie)\nDrugged(blythe)\nnot Reconciled(karly)\nCrumpled(stella)\nUnshapely(blythe) -> Mediate(blythe)\nforall x (Reconciled(x) -> Mediate(x))\nforall x (Drugged(x) -> Ethnic(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) and not Rimmed(x) -> Ethnic(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) -> Unshapely(x))\nReconciled(arie) and not Ethnic(arie) -> Crumpled(arie)\n\nnot Drugged(arie)\n\nnot Drugged(arie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Olin is gabled. Teena is proximo. Bridgett is not bush. Zachery is dextral. If Teena is gabled then Teena is copious. If someone is bush then they are copious. If someone is proximo then they are jointed. If someone is gabled and not furtive then they are jointed. Kind people are gabled. If Olin is bush and Olin is not jointed then Olin is dextral. Bridgett is proximo.", "logic": "\nGabled(olin)\nProximo(teena)\nnot Bush(bridgett)\nDextral(zachery)\nGabled(teena) -> Copious(teena)\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Copious(x))\nforall x (Proximo(x) -> Jointed(x))\nforall x (Gabled(x) and not Furtive(x) -> Jointed(x))\nforall x (Jointed(x) -> Gabled(x))\nBush(olin) and not Jointed(olin) -> Dextral(olin)\n\nProximo(bridgett)\n\nProximo(bridgett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-771"} {"premises": "Selma is uncombable. Selma is alliaceous. Selma is distressed. Karalynn is alliaceous. Karalynn is distressed. Bengt is urethral. Bengt is nutrient. Bengt is distressed. Aziz is rhymeless. Aziz is uncombable. All uncombable people are rhymeless. If someone is urethral then they are favorite. If Karalynn is rhymeless and Karalynn is uncombable then Karalynn is nutrient. If someone is alliaceous and distressed then they are nutrient. All uncombable people are alliaceous. All distressed people are favorite. If someone is alliaceous then they are distressed. Rough people are alliaceous. Selma is distressed.", "logic": "\nUncombable(selma)\nAlliaceous(selma)\nDistressed(selma)\nAlliaceous(karalynn)\nDistressed(karalynn)\nUrethral(bengt)\nNutrient(bengt)\nDistressed(bengt)\nRhymeless(aziz)\nUncombable(aziz)\nforall x (Uncombable(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nforall x (Urethral(x) -> Favorite(x))\nRhymeless(karalynn) and Uncombable(karalynn) -> Nutrient(karalynn)\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) and Distressed(x) -> Nutrient(x))\nforall x (Uncombable(x) -> Alliaceous(x))\nforall x (Distressed(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) -> Distressed(x))\nforall x (Favorite(x) -> Alliaceous(x))\n\nDistressed(selma)\n\ntherefore Distressed(selma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Joby is dilettante. Joby is absorbing. Joby is zoic. Clare is absorbing. Clare is zoic. Glyn is humiliated. Glyn is freehanded. Glyn is zoic. Evanne is antic. Evanne is dilettante. All dilettante people are antic. If someone is humiliated then they are lunatic. If Clare is antic and Clare is dilettante then Clare is freehanded. If someone is absorbing and zoic then they are freehanded. All dilettante people are absorbing. All zoic people are lunatic. If someone is absorbing then they are zoic. Rough people are absorbing. Joby is not absorbing.", "logic": "\nDilettante(joby)\nAbsorbing(joby)\nZoic(joby)\nAbsorbing(clare)\nZoic(clare)\nHumiliated(glyn)\nFreehanded(glyn)\nZoic(glyn)\nAntic(evanne)\nDilettante(evanne)\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Antic(x))\nforall x (Humiliated(x) -> Lunatic(x))\nAntic(clare) and Dilettante(clare) -> Freehanded(clare)\nforall x (Absorbing(x) and Zoic(x) -> Freehanded(x))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Lunatic(x))\nforall x (Absorbing(x) -> Zoic(x))\nforall x (Lunatic(x) -> Absorbing(x))\n\nnot Absorbing(joby)\n\ntherefore Absorbing(joby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Daniela is harrowing. Daniela is pupal. Daniela is babylonian. Jacquelin is pupal. Jacquelin is babylonian. Zorana is spiky. Zorana is bismuthal. Zorana is babylonian. Gerti is morphemic. Gerti is harrowing. All harrowing people are morphemic. If someone is spiky then they are chelonian. If Jacquelin is morphemic and Jacquelin is harrowing then Jacquelin is bismuthal. If someone is pupal and babylonian then they are bismuthal. All harrowing people are pupal. All babylonian people are chelonian. If someone is pupal then they are babylonian. Rough people are pupal. Daniela is morphemic.", "logic": "\nHarrowing(daniela)\nPupal(daniela)\nBabylonian(daniela)\nPupal(jacquelin)\nBabylonian(jacquelin)\nSpiky(zorana)\nBismuthal(zorana)\nBabylonian(zorana)\nMorphemic(gerti)\nHarrowing(gerti)\nforall x (Harrowing(x) -> Morphemic(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> Chelonian(x))\nMorphemic(jacquelin) and Harrowing(jacquelin) -> Bismuthal(jacquelin)\nforall x (Pupal(x) and Babylonian(x) -> Bismuthal(x))\nforall x (Harrowing(x) -> Pupal(x))\nforall x (Babylonian(x) -> Chelonian(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Babylonian(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Pupal(x))\n\nMorphemic(daniela)\n\nHarrowing(daniela) and forall x (Harrowing(x) -> Morphemic(x)) -> therefore Morphemic(daniela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Henrie is doddering. Henrie is cytotoxic. Henrie is crowned. Malvina is cytotoxic. Malvina is crowned. French is major. French is bastardly. French is crowned. Hayward is unionised. Hayward is doddering. All doddering people are unionised. If someone is major then they are important. If Malvina is unionised and Malvina is doddering then Malvina is bastardly. If someone is cytotoxic and crowned then they are bastardly. All doddering people are cytotoxic. All crowned people are important. If someone is cytotoxic then they are crowned. Rough people are cytotoxic. Henrie is not unionised.", "logic": "\nDoddering(henrie)\nCytotoxic(henrie)\nCrowned(henrie)\nCytotoxic(malvina)\nCrowned(malvina)\nMajor(french)\nBastardly(french)\nCrowned(french)\nUnionised(hayward)\nDoddering(hayward)\nforall x (Doddering(x) -> Unionised(x))\nforall x (Major(x) -> Important(x))\nUnionised(malvina) and Doddering(malvina) -> Bastardly(malvina)\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) and Crowned(x) -> Bastardly(x))\nforall x (Doddering(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Crowned(x) -> Important(x))\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Crowned(x))\nforall x (Important(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\n\nnot Unionised(henrie)\n\nDoddering(henrie) and forall x (Doddering(x) -> Unionised(x)) -> therefore Unionised(henrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Avraham is unharmed. Avraham is cernuous. Avraham is boisterous. Kiri is cernuous. Kiri is boisterous. Jeane is tied. Jeane is lento. Jeane is boisterous. Shirlee is diamantine. Shirlee is unharmed. All unharmed people are diamantine. If someone is tied then they are leafy. If Kiri is diamantine and Kiri is unharmed then Kiri is lento. If someone is cernuous and boisterous then they are lento. All unharmed people are cernuous. All boisterous people are leafy. If someone is cernuous then they are boisterous. Rough people are cernuous. Shirlee is boisterous.", "logic": "\nUnharmed(avraham)\nCernuous(avraham)\nBoisterous(avraham)\nCernuous(kiri)\nBoisterous(kiri)\nTied(jeane)\nLento(jeane)\nBoisterous(jeane)\nDiamantine(shirlee)\nUnharmed(shirlee)\nforall x (Unharmed(x) -> Diamantine(x))\nforall x (Tied(x) -> Leafy(x))\nDiamantine(kiri) and Unharmed(kiri) -> Lento(kiri)\nforall x (Cernuous(x) and Boisterous(x) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Unharmed(x) -> Cernuous(x))\nforall x (Boisterous(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Cernuous(x) -> Boisterous(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) -> Cernuous(x))\n\nBoisterous(shirlee)\n\nUnharmed(shirlee) and forall x (Unharmed(x) -> Cernuous(x)) -> therefore Cernuous(shirlee) Cernuous(shirlee) and forall x (Cernuous(x) -> Boisterous(x)) -> therefore Boisterous(shirlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Ronald is farseeing. Ronald is aggravated. Ronald is elastic. Stefania is aggravated. Stefania is elastic. Krystle is honorary. Krystle is triploid. Krystle is elastic. Denna is subdural. Denna is farseeing. All farseeing people are subdural. If someone is honorary then they are rouged. If Stefania is subdural and Stefania is farseeing then Stefania is triploid. If someone is aggravated and elastic then they are triploid. All farseeing people are aggravated. All elastic people are rouged. If someone is aggravated then they are elastic. Rough people are aggravated. Denna is not elastic.", "logic": "\nFarseeing(ronald)\nAggravated(ronald)\nElastic(ronald)\nAggravated(stefania)\nElastic(stefania)\nHonorary(krystle)\nTriploid(krystle)\nElastic(krystle)\nSubdural(denna)\nFarseeing(denna)\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Honorary(x) -> Rouged(x))\nSubdural(stefania) and Farseeing(stefania) -> Triploid(stefania)\nforall x (Aggravated(x) and Elastic(x) -> Triploid(x))\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Aggravated(x))\nforall x (Elastic(x) -> Rouged(x))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Elastic(x))\nforall x (Rouged(x) -> Aggravated(x))\n\nnot Elastic(denna)\n\nFarseeing(denna) and forall x (Farseeing(x) -> Aggravated(x)) -> therefore Aggravated(denna) Aggravated(denna) and forall x (Aggravated(x) -> Elastic(x)) -> therefore Elastic(denna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Odella is antepartum. Odella is reentrant. Odella is warning. Jillane is reentrant. Jillane is warning. Cloe is nonkosher. Cloe is lxviii. Cloe is warning. Rebekah is wysiwyg. Rebekah is antepartum. All antepartum people are wysiwyg. If someone is nonkosher then they are third. If Jillane is wysiwyg and Jillane is antepartum then Jillane is lxviii. If someone is reentrant and warning then they are lxviii. All antepartum people are reentrant. All warning people are third. If someone is reentrant then they are warning. Rough people are reentrant. Rebekah is lxviii.", "logic": "\nAntepartum(odella)\nReentrant(odella)\nWarning(odella)\nReentrant(jillane)\nWarning(jillane)\nNonkosher(cloe)\nLxviii(cloe)\nWarning(cloe)\nWysiwyg(rebekah)\nAntepartum(rebekah)\nforall x (Antepartum(x) -> Wysiwyg(x))\nforall x (Nonkosher(x) -> Third(x))\nWysiwyg(jillane) and Antepartum(jillane) -> Lxviii(jillane)\nforall x (Reentrant(x) and Warning(x) -> Lxviii(x))\nforall x (Antepartum(x) -> Reentrant(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Third(x))\nforall x (Reentrant(x) -> Warning(x))\nforall x (Third(x) -> Reentrant(x))\n\nLxviii(rebekah)\n\nAntepartum(rebekah) and forall x (Antepartum(x) -> Reentrant(x)) -> therefore Reentrant(rebekah) Antepartum(rebekah) and forall x (Antepartum(x) -> Reentrant(x)) -> therefore Reentrant(rebekah) Reentrant(rebekah) and forall x (Reentrant(x) -> Warning(x)) -> therefore Warning(rebekah) Reentrant(rebekah) and Warning(rebekah) and forall x (Reentrant(x) and Warning(x) -> Lxviii(x)) -> therefore Lxviii(rebekah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Deonne is stalwart. Deonne is hitless. Deonne is unsafe. Dido is hitless. Dido is unsafe. Cherie is graspable. Cherie is cashable. Cherie is unsafe. Danny is backstairs. Danny is stalwart. All stalwart people are backstairs. If someone is graspable then they are prejudiced. If Dido is backstairs and Dido is stalwart then Dido is cashable. If someone is hitless and unsafe then they are cashable. All stalwart people are hitless. All unsafe people are prejudiced. If someone is hitless then they are unsafe. Rough people are hitless. Danny is not cashable.", "logic": "\nStalwart(deonne)\nHitless(deonne)\nUnsafe(deonne)\nHitless(dido)\nUnsafe(dido)\nGraspable(cherie)\nCashable(cherie)\nUnsafe(cherie)\nBackstairs(danny)\nStalwart(danny)\nforall x (Stalwart(x) -> Backstairs(x))\nforall x (Graspable(x) -> Prejudiced(x))\nBackstairs(dido) and Stalwart(dido) -> Cashable(dido)\nforall x (Hitless(x) and Unsafe(x) -> Cashable(x))\nforall x (Stalwart(x) -> Hitless(x))\nforall x (Unsafe(x) -> Prejudiced(x))\nforall x (Hitless(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) -> Hitless(x))\n\nnot Cashable(danny)\n\nStalwart(danny) and forall x (Stalwart(x) -> Hitless(x)) -> therefore Hitless(danny) Stalwart(danny) and forall x (Stalwart(x) -> Hitless(x)) -> therefore Hitless(danny) Hitless(danny) and forall x (Hitless(x) -> Unsafe(x)) -> therefore Unsafe(danny) Hitless(danny) and Unsafe(danny) and forall x (Hitless(x) and Unsafe(x) -> Cashable(x)) -> therefore Cashable(danny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Elyse is eastmost. Elyse is dazed. Elyse is aryan. Simona is dazed. Simona is aryan. Caprice is neutered. Caprice is avuncular. Caprice is aryan. Mayor is baffling. Mayor is eastmost. All eastmost people are baffling. If someone is neutered then they are costumed. If Simona is baffling and Simona is eastmost then Simona is avuncular. If someone is dazed and aryan then they are avuncular. All eastmost people are dazed. All aryan people are costumed. If someone is dazed then they are aryan. Rough people are dazed. Caprice is not baffling.", "logic": "\nEastmost(elyse)\nDazed(elyse)\nAryan(elyse)\nDazed(simona)\nAryan(simona)\nNeutered(caprice)\nAvuncular(caprice)\nAryan(caprice)\nBaffling(mayor)\nEastmost(mayor)\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Baffling(x))\nforall x (Neutered(x) -> Costumed(x))\nBaffling(simona) and Eastmost(simona) -> Avuncular(simona)\nforall x (Dazed(x) and Aryan(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Dazed(x))\nforall x (Aryan(x) -> Costumed(x))\nforall x (Dazed(x) -> Aryan(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) -> Dazed(x))\n\nnot Baffling(caprice)\n\nforall x (Eastmost(x) -> Baffling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Mercedes is oppressed. Mercedes is ingrown. Mercedes is unseeable. Krystle is ingrown. Krystle is unseeable. Dayle is pontifical. Dayle is engaged. Dayle is unseeable. Roosevelt is mensural. Roosevelt is oppressed. All oppressed people are mensural. If someone is pontifical then they are brimming. If Krystle is mensural and Krystle is oppressed then Krystle is engaged. If someone is ingrown and unseeable then they are engaged. All oppressed people are ingrown. All unseeable people are brimming. If someone is ingrown then they are unseeable. Rough people are ingrown. Krystle is mensural.", "logic": "\nOppressed(mercedes)\nIngrown(mercedes)\nUnseeable(mercedes)\nIngrown(krystle)\nUnseeable(krystle)\nPontifical(dayle)\nEngaged(dayle)\nUnseeable(dayle)\nMensural(roosevelt)\nOppressed(roosevelt)\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Mensural(x))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> Brimming(x))\nMensural(krystle) and Oppressed(krystle) -> Engaged(krystle)\nforall x (Ingrown(x) and Unseeable(x) -> Engaged(x))\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Ingrown(x))\nforall x (Unseeable(x) -> Brimming(x))\nforall x (Ingrown(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Brimming(x) -> Ingrown(x))\n\nMensural(krystle)\n\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Mensural(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Natalya is musky. Natalya is epigastric. Natalya is precocious. Barris is epigastric. Barris is precocious. Tootsie is ambivalent. Tootsie is curved. Tootsie is precocious. Broderic is kyphotic. Broderic is musky. All musky people are kyphotic. If someone is ambivalent then they are demonic. If Barris is kyphotic and Barris is musky then Barris is curved. If someone is epigastric and precocious then they are curved. All musky people are epigastric. All precocious people are demonic. If someone is epigastric then they are precocious. Rough people are epigastric. Broderic is not ambivalent.", "logic": "\nMusky(natalya)\nEpigastric(natalya)\nPrecocious(natalya)\nEpigastric(barris)\nPrecocious(barris)\nAmbivalent(tootsie)\nCurved(tootsie)\nPrecocious(tootsie)\nKyphotic(broderic)\nMusky(broderic)\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Kyphotic(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Demonic(x))\nKyphotic(barris) and Musky(barris) -> Curved(barris)\nforall x (Epigastric(x) and Precocious(x) -> Curved(x))\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Epigastric(x))\nforall x (Precocious(x) -> Demonic(x))\nforall x (Epigastric(x) -> Precocious(x))\nforall x (Demonic(x) -> Epigastric(x))\n\nnot Ambivalent(broderic)\n\nnot Ambivalent(broderic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Ina is unladylike. Ina is anomalous. Ina is schizoid. Yoko is anomalous. Yoko is schizoid. Yale is amiss. Yale is unerring. Yale is schizoid. Alex is corbelled. Alex is unladylike. All unladylike people are corbelled. If someone is amiss then they are supported. If Yoko is corbelled and Yoko is unladylike then Yoko is unerring. If someone is anomalous and schizoid then they are unerring. All unladylike people are anomalous. All schizoid people are supported. If someone is anomalous then they are schizoid. Rough people are anomalous. Ina is amiss.", "logic": "\nUnladylike(ina)\nAnomalous(ina)\nSchizoid(ina)\nAnomalous(yoko)\nSchizoid(yoko)\nAmiss(yale)\nUnerring(yale)\nSchizoid(yale)\nCorbelled(alex)\nUnladylike(alex)\nforall x (Unladylike(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> Supported(x))\nCorbelled(yoko) and Unladylike(yoko) -> Unerring(yoko)\nforall x (Anomalous(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Unerring(x))\nforall x (Unladylike(x) -> Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Schizoid(x) -> Supported(x))\nforall x (Anomalous(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nforall x (Supported(x) -> Anomalous(x))\n\nAmiss(ina)\n\nAmiss(ina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Abe is colourless. Abe is taurine. Abe is unpointed. Sarina is taurine. Sarina is unpointed. Barrie is diamantine. Barrie is paleozoic. Barrie is unpointed. Florrie is hermetic. Florrie is colourless. All colourless people are hermetic. If someone is diamantine then they are prone. If Sarina is hermetic and Sarina is colourless then Sarina is paleozoic. If someone is taurine and unpointed then they are paleozoic. All colourless people are taurine. All unpointed people are prone. If someone is taurine then they are unpointed. Rough people are taurine. Sarina is not diamantine.", "logic": "\nColourless(abe)\nTaurine(abe)\nUnpointed(abe)\nTaurine(sarina)\nUnpointed(sarina)\nDiamantine(barrie)\nPaleozoic(barrie)\nUnpointed(barrie)\nHermetic(florrie)\nColourless(florrie)\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Hermetic(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) -> Prone(x))\nHermetic(sarina) and Colourless(sarina) -> Paleozoic(sarina)\nforall x (Taurine(x) and Unpointed(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) -> Taurine(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Taurine(x))\n\nnot Diamantine(sarina)\n\nnot Diamantine(sarina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Diann is ergotropic. Diann is referent. Diann is syntactic. Desiri is referent. Desiri is syntactic. Nolie is mimic. Nolie is deathlike. Nolie is syntactic. Emily is ammoniac. Emily is ergotropic. All ergotropic people are ammoniac. If someone is mimic then they are prominent. If Desiri is ammoniac and Desiri is ergotropic then Desiri is deathlike. If someone is referent and syntactic then they are deathlike. All ergotropic people are referent. All syntactic people are prominent. If someone is referent then they are syntactic. Rough people are referent. Desiri is ergotropic.", "logic": "\nErgotropic(diann)\nReferent(diann)\nSyntactic(diann)\nReferent(desiri)\nSyntactic(desiri)\nMimic(nolie)\nDeathlike(nolie)\nSyntactic(nolie)\nAmmoniac(emily)\nErgotropic(emily)\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Mimic(x) -> Prominent(x))\nAmmoniac(desiri) and Ergotropic(desiri) -> Deathlike(desiri)\nforall x (Referent(x) and Syntactic(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) -> Referent(x))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) -> Prominent(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Prominent(x) -> Referent(x))\n\nErgotropic(desiri)\n\nErgotropic(desiri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-104"} {"premises": "Nick is pierced. Nick is assured. Nick is jaded. Nick is goosey. Iona is asquint. Iona is pierced. Iona is renegade. Iona is jaded. Helyn is asquint. Helyn is pierced. Helyn is renegade. Helyn is assured. Helyn is jaded. Imogen is pierced. Imogen is assured. Imogen is resolved. If Nick is goosey and Nick is pierced then Nick is renegade. Smart people are renegade. If someone is asquint and pierced then they are resolved. Kind people are jaded. If someone is jaded and pierced then they are asquint. If Helyn is goosey then Helyn is assured. Iona is asquint.", "logic": "\nPierced(nick)\nAssured(nick)\nJaded(nick)\nGoosey(nick)\nAsquint(iona)\nPierced(iona)\nRenegade(iona)\nJaded(iona)\nAsquint(helyn)\nPierced(helyn)\nRenegade(helyn)\nAssured(helyn)\nJaded(helyn)\nPierced(imogen)\nAssured(imogen)\nResolved(imogen)\nGoosey(nick) and Pierced(nick) -> Renegade(nick)\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Renegade(x))\nforall x (Asquint(x) and Pierced(x) -> Resolved(x))\nforall x (Renegade(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) and Pierced(x) -> Asquint(x))\nGoosey(helyn) -> Assured(helyn)\n\nAsquint(iona)\n\ntherefore Asquint(iona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Roddy is salutary. Roddy is persistent. Roddy is mismatched. Roddy is acapnotic. Sturgis is kosher. Sturgis is salutary. Sturgis is tenfold. Sturgis is mismatched. Maudie is kosher. Maudie is salutary. Maudie is tenfold. Maudie is persistent. Maudie is mismatched. Marylee is salutary. Marylee is persistent. Marylee is ticklish. If Roddy is acapnotic and Roddy is salutary then Roddy is tenfold. Smart people are tenfold. If someone is kosher and salutary then they are ticklish. Kind people are mismatched. If someone is mismatched and salutary then they are kosher. If Maudie is acapnotic then Maudie is persistent. Maudie is not persistent.", "logic": "\nSalutary(roddy)\nPersistent(roddy)\nMismatched(roddy)\nAcapnotic(roddy)\nKosher(sturgis)\nSalutary(sturgis)\nTenfold(sturgis)\nMismatched(sturgis)\nKosher(maudie)\nSalutary(maudie)\nTenfold(maudie)\nPersistent(maudie)\nMismatched(maudie)\nSalutary(marylee)\nPersistent(marylee)\nTicklish(marylee)\nAcapnotic(roddy) and Salutary(roddy) -> Tenfold(roddy)\nforall x (Ticklish(x) -> Tenfold(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Salutary(x) -> Ticklish(x))\nforall x (Tenfold(x) -> Mismatched(x))\nforall x (Mismatched(x) and Salutary(x) -> Kosher(x))\nAcapnotic(maudie) -> Persistent(maudie)\n\nnot Persistent(maudie)\n\ntherefore Persistent(maudie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Hayes is dogging. Hayes is twenty. Hayes is wearable. Hayes is unstated. Katuscha is uncaring. Katuscha is dogging. Katuscha is micro. Katuscha is wearable. Nadia is uncaring. Nadia is dogging. Nadia is micro. Nadia is twenty. Nadia is wearable. Karen is dogging. Karen is twenty. Karen is unsilenced. If Hayes is unstated and Hayes is dogging then Hayes is micro. Smart people are micro. If someone is uncaring and dogging then they are unsilenced. Kind people are wearable. If someone is wearable and dogging then they are uncaring. If Nadia is unstated then Nadia is twenty. Karen is micro.", "logic": "\nDogging(hayes)\nTwenty(hayes)\nWearable(hayes)\nUnstated(hayes)\nUncaring(katuscha)\nDogging(katuscha)\nMicro(katuscha)\nWearable(katuscha)\nUncaring(nadia)\nDogging(nadia)\nMicro(nadia)\nTwenty(nadia)\nWearable(nadia)\nDogging(karen)\nTwenty(karen)\nUnsilenced(karen)\nUnstated(hayes) and Dogging(hayes) -> Micro(hayes)\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Micro(x))\nforall x (Uncaring(x) and Dogging(x) -> Unsilenced(x))\nforall x (Micro(x) -> Wearable(x))\nforall x (Wearable(x) and Dogging(x) -> Uncaring(x))\nUnstated(nadia) -> Twenty(nadia)\n\nMicro(karen)\n\nUnsilenced(karen) and forall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Micro(x)) -> therefore Micro(karen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Taylor is aided. Taylor is dismal. Taylor is shattered. Taylor is repeated. Godiva is dickey. Godiva is aided. Godiva is affective. Godiva is shattered. Angel is dickey. Angel is aided. Angel is affective. Angel is dismal. Angel is shattered. Leola is aided. Leola is dismal. Leola is raptorial. If Taylor is repeated and Taylor is aided then Taylor is affective. Smart people are affective. If someone is dickey and aided then they are raptorial. Kind people are shattered. If someone is shattered and aided then they are dickey. If Angel is repeated then Angel is dismal. Angel is not raptorial.", "logic": "\nAided(taylor)\nDismal(taylor)\nShattered(taylor)\nRepeated(taylor)\nDickey(godiva)\nAided(godiva)\nAffective(godiva)\nShattered(godiva)\nDickey(angel)\nAided(angel)\nAffective(angel)\nDismal(angel)\nShattered(angel)\nAided(leola)\nDismal(leola)\nRaptorial(leola)\nRepeated(taylor) and Aided(taylor) -> Affective(taylor)\nforall x (Raptorial(x) -> Affective(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) and Aided(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Affective(x) -> Shattered(x))\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Aided(x) -> Dickey(x))\nRepeated(angel) -> Dismal(angel)\n\nnot Raptorial(angel)\n\nDickey(angel) and Aided(angel) and forall x (Dickey(x) and Aided(x) -> Raptorial(x)) -> therefore Raptorial(angel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Candra is excursive. Candra is ravening. Candra is principled. Candra is frail. Helaina is aldermanly. Helaina is excursive. Helaina is licked. Helaina is principled. Dacy is aldermanly. Dacy is excursive. Dacy is licked. Dacy is ravening. Dacy is principled. Ross is excursive. Ross is ravening. Ross is solicitous. If Candra is frail and Candra is excursive then Candra is licked. Smart people are licked. If someone is aldermanly and excursive then they are solicitous. Kind people are principled. If someone is principled and excursive then they are aldermanly. If Dacy is frail then Dacy is ravening. Ross is principled.", "logic": "\nExcursive(candra)\nRavening(candra)\nPrincipled(candra)\nFrail(candra)\nAldermanly(helaina)\nExcursive(helaina)\nLicked(helaina)\nPrincipled(helaina)\nAldermanly(dacy)\nExcursive(dacy)\nLicked(dacy)\nRavening(dacy)\nPrincipled(dacy)\nExcursive(ross)\nRavening(ross)\nSolicitous(ross)\nFrail(candra) and Excursive(candra) -> Licked(candra)\nforall x (Solicitous(x) -> Licked(x))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) and Excursive(x) -> Solicitous(x))\nforall x (Licked(x) -> Principled(x))\nforall x (Principled(x) and Excursive(x) -> Aldermanly(x))\nFrail(dacy) -> Ravening(dacy)\n\nPrincipled(ross)\n\nSolicitous(ross) and forall x (Solicitous(x) -> Licked(x)) -> therefore Licked(ross) Licked(ross) and forall x (Licked(x) -> Principled(x)) -> therefore Principled(ross)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Clint is misbranded. Clint is shriveled. Clint is vapid. Clint is sixfold. Alidia is infuriated. Alidia is misbranded. Alidia is catchpenny. Alidia is vapid. Emyle is infuriated. Emyle is misbranded. Emyle is catchpenny. Emyle is shriveled. Emyle is vapid. Nissy is misbranded. Nissy is shriveled. Nissy is seventieth. If Clint is sixfold and Clint is misbranded then Clint is catchpenny. Smart people are catchpenny. If someone is infuriated and misbranded then they are seventieth. Kind people are vapid. If someone is vapid and misbranded then they are infuriated. If Emyle is sixfold then Emyle is shriveled. Nissy is not vapid.", "logic": "\nMisbranded(clint)\nShriveled(clint)\nVapid(clint)\nSixfold(clint)\nInfuriated(alidia)\nMisbranded(alidia)\nCatchpenny(alidia)\nVapid(alidia)\nInfuriated(emyle)\nMisbranded(emyle)\nCatchpenny(emyle)\nShriveled(emyle)\nVapid(emyle)\nMisbranded(nissy)\nShriveled(nissy)\nSeventieth(nissy)\nSixfold(clint) and Misbranded(clint) -> Catchpenny(clint)\nforall x (Seventieth(x) -> Catchpenny(x))\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Misbranded(x) -> Seventieth(x))\nforall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Vapid(x) and Misbranded(x) -> Infuriated(x))\nSixfold(emyle) -> Shriveled(emyle)\n\nnot Vapid(nissy)\n\nSeventieth(nissy) and forall x (Seventieth(x) -> Catchpenny(x)) -> therefore Catchpenny(nissy) Catchpenny(nissy) and forall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Vapid(x)) -> therefore Vapid(nissy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Gussie is umteen. Gussie is jelled. Gussie is flameproof. Gussie is obscene. Cornellis is innate. Cornellis is umteen. Cornellis is tearful. Cornellis is flameproof. Tuesday is innate. Tuesday is umteen. Tuesday is tearful. Tuesday is jelled. Tuesday is flameproof. Glynda is umteen. Glynda is jelled. Glynda is lyrate. If Gussie is obscene and Gussie is umteen then Gussie is tearful. Smart people are tearful. If someone is innate and umteen then they are lyrate. Kind people are flameproof. If someone is flameproof and umteen then they are innate. If Tuesday is obscene then Tuesday is jelled. Glynda is innate.", "logic": "\nUmteen(gussie)\nJelled(gussie)\nFlameproof(gussie)\nObscene(gussie)\nInnate(cornellis)\nUmteen(cornellis)\nTearful(cornellis)\nFlameproof(cornellis)\nInnate(tuesday)\nUmteen(tuesday)\nTearful(tuesday)\nJelled(tuesday)\nFlameproof(tuesday)\nUmteen(glynda)\nJelled(glynda)\nLyrate(glynda)\nObscene(gussie) and Umteen(gussie) -> Tearful(gussie)\nforall x (Lyrate(x) -> Tearful(x))\nforall x (Innate(x) and Umteen(x) -> Lyrate(x))\nforall x (Tearful(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Umteen(x) -> Innate(x))\nObscene(tuesday) -> Jelled(tuesday)\n\nInnate(glynda)\n\nLyrate(glynda) and forall x (Lyrate(x) -> Tearful(x)) -> therefore Tearful(glynda) Tearful(glynda) and forall x (Tearful(x) -> Flameproof(x)) -> therefore Flameproof(glynda) Flameproof(glynda) and Umteen(glynda) and forall x (Flameproof(x) and Umteen(x) -> Innate(x)) -> therefore Innate(glynda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Lotta is reanimated. Lotta is declared. Lotta is multilane. Lotta is parietal. Kimberley is noticed. Kimberley is reanimated. Kimberley is perdurable. Kimberley is multilane. Malcolm is noticed. Malcolm is reanimated. Malcolm is perdurable. Malcolm is declared. Malcolm is multilane. Orazio is reanimated. Orazio is declared. Orazio is olfactive. If Lotta is parietal and Lotta is reanimated then Lotta is perdurable. Smart people are perdurable. If someone is noticed and reanimated then they are olfactive. Kind people are multilane. If someone is multilane and reanimated then they are noticed. If Malcolm is parietal then Malcolm is declared. Orazio is not noticed.", "logic": "\nReanimated(lotta)\nDeclared(lotta)\nMultilane(lotta)\nParietal(lotta)\nNoticed(kimberley)\nReanimated(kimberley)\nPerdurable(kimberley)\nMultilane(kimberley)\nNoticed(malcolm)\nReanimated(malcolm)\nPerdurable(malcolm)\nDeclared(malcolm)\nMultilane(malcolm)\nReanimated(orazio)\nDeclared(orazio)\nOlfactive(orazio)\nParietal(lotta) and Reanimated(lotta) -> Perdurable(lotta)\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Perdurable(x))\nforall x (Noticed(x) and Reanimated(x) -> Olfactive(x))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) -> Multilane(x))\nforall x (Multilane(x) and Reanimated(x) -> Noticed(x))\nParietal(malcolm) -> Declared(malcolm)\n\nnot Noticed(orazio)\n\nOlfactive(orazio) and forall x (Olfactive(x) -> Perdurable(x)) -> therefore Perdurable(orazio) Perdurable(orazio) and forall x (Perdurable(x) -> Multilane(x)) -> therefore Multilane(orazio) Multilane(orazio) and Reanimated(orazio) and forall x (Multilane(x) and Reanimated(x) -> Noticed(x)) -> therefore Noticed(orazio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Marianna is visaged. Marianna is cosmologic. Marianna is pettish. Marianna is unflawed. Bridgett is essential. Bridgett is visaged. Bridgett is liturgical. Bridgett is pettish. Ileane is essential. Ileane is visaged. Ileane is liturgical. Ileane is cosmologic. Ileane is pettish. Seth is visaged. Seth is cosmologic. Seth is ended. If Marianna is unflawed and Marianna is visaged then Marianna is liturgical. Smart people are liturgical. If someone is essential and visaged then they are ended. Kind people are pettish. If someone is pettish and visaged then they are essential. If Ileane is unflawed then Ileane is cosmologic. Bridgett is not cosmologic.", "logic": "\nVisaged(marianna)\nCosmologic(marianna)\nPettish(marianna)\nUnflawed(marianna)\nEssential(bridgett)\nVisaged(bridgett)\nLiturgical(bridgett)\nPettish(bridgett)\nEssential(ileane)\nVisaged(ileane)\nLiturgical(ileane)\nCosmologic(ileane)\nPettish(ileane)\nVisaged(seth)\nCosmologic(seth)\nEnded(seth)\nUnflawed(marianna) and Visaged(marianna) -> Liturgical(marianna)\nforall x (Ended(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Essential(x) and Visaged(x) -> Ended(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) -> Pettish(x))\nforall x (Pettish(x) and Visaged(x) -> Essential(x))\nUnflawed(ileane) -> Cosmologic(ileane)\n\nnot Cosmologic(bridgett)\n\nnot Cosmologic(bridgett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Freda is algerian. Freda is ignoble. Freda is unrevived. Freda is flint. Vivianna is loosened. Vivianna is algerian. Vivianna is menial. Vivianna is unrevived. Moishe is loosened. Moishe is algerian. Moishe is menial. Moishe is ignoble. Moishe is unrevived. Lethia is algerian. Lethia is ignoble. Lethia is estimable. If Freda is flint and Freda is algerian then Freda is menial. Smart people are menial. If someone is loosened and algerian then they are estimable. Kind people are unrevived. If someone is unrevived and algerian then they are loosened. If Moishe is flint then Moishe is ignoble. Lethia is flint.", "logic": "\nAlgerian(freda)\nIgnoble(freda)\nUnrevived(freda)\nFlint(freda)\nLoosened(vivianna)\nAlgerian(vivianna)\nMenial(vivianna)\nUnrevived(vivianna)\nLoosened(moishe)\nAlgerian(moishe)\nMenial(moishe)\nIgnoble(moishe)\nUnrevived(moishe)\nAlgerian(lethia)\nIgnoble(lethia)\nEstimable(lethia)\nFlint(freda) and Algerian(freda) -> Menial(freda)\nforall x (Estimable(x) -> Menial(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) and Algerian(x) -> Estimable(x))\nforall x (Menial(x) -> Unrevived(x))\nforall x (Unrevived(x) and Algerian(x) -> Loosened(x))\nFlint(moishe) -> Ignoble(moishe)\n\nFlint(lethia)\n\nFlint(lethia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Caron is fair. Caron is eonian. Caron is carbonated. Caron is pretty. Sallee is inflatable. Sallee is fair. Sallee is formosan. Sallee is carbonated. Roselyn is inflatable. Roselyn is fair. Roselyn is formosan. Roselyn is eonian. Roselyn is carbonated. Shandra is fair. Shandra is eonian. Shandra is mutant. If Caron is pretty and Caron is fair then Caron is formosan. Smart people are formosan. If someone is inflatable and fair then they are mutant. Kind people are carbonated. If someone is carbonated and fair then they are inflatable. If Roselyn is pretty then Roselyn is eonian. Sallee is not pretty.", "logic": "\nFair(caron)\nEonian(caron)\nCarbonated(caron)\nPretty(caron)\nInflatable(sallee)\nFair(sallee)\nFormosan(sallee)\nCarbonated(sallee)\nInflatable(roselyn)\nFair(roselyn)\nFormosan(roselyn)\nEonian(roselyn)\nCarbonated(roselyn)\nFair(shandra)\nEonian(shandra)\nMutant(shandra)\nPretty(caron) and Fair(caron) -> Formosan(caron)\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> Formosan(x))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) and Fair(x) -> Mutant(x))\nforall x (Formosan(x) -> Carbonated(x))\nforall x (Carbonated(x) and Fair(x) -> Inflatable(x))\nPretty(roselyn) -> Eonian(roselyn)\n\nnot Pretty(sallee)\n\nnot Pretty(sallee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "Clara is dosed. Clara is calyceal. Clara is grandiose. Clara is bitumenoid. Odele is preventive. Odele is dosed. Odele is abuzz. Odele is grandiose. Woodie is preventive. Woodie is dosed. Woodie is abuzz. Woodie is calyceal. Woodie is grandiose. Aura is dosed. Aura is calyceal. Aura is strategic. If Clara is bitumenoid and Clara is dosed then Clara is abuzz. Smart people are abuzz. If someone is preventive and dosed then they are strategic. Kind people are grandiose. If someone is grandiose and dosed then they are preventive. If Woodie is bitumenoid then Woodie is calyceal. Woodie is bitumenoid.", "logic": "\nDosed(clara)\nCalyceal(clara)\nGrandiose(clara)\nBitumenoid(clara)\nPreventive(odele)\nDosed(odele)\nAbuzz(odele)\nGrandiose(odele)\nPreventive(woodie)\nDosed(woodie)\nAbuzz(woodie)\nCalyceal(woodie)\nGrandiose(woodie)\nDosed(aura)\nCalyceal(aura)\nStrategic(aura)\nBitumenoid(clara) and Dosed(clara) -> Abuzz(clara)\nforall x (Strategic(x) -> Abuzz(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) and Dosed(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Abuzz(x) -> Grandiose(x))\nforall x (Grandiose(x) and Dosed(x) -> Preventive(x))\nBitumenoid(woodie) -> Calyceal(woodie)\n\nBitumenoid(woodie)\n\nBitumenoid(woodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1662"} {"premises": "The jazmin is auxiliary. The rafe is heralded. The pearle is auxiliary. The carlotta devise the jazmin. If something is heralded then it subtend the jazmin. If something deodorise the jazmin then the jazmin devise the pearle. If something deodorise the carlotta then the carlotta devise the jazmin. If the jazmin is auxiliary then the jazmin devise the carlotta. If something subtend the jazmin then it deodorise the pearle. If something deodorise the pearle then the pearle is heralded. The jazmin is auxiliary.", "logic": "\nAuxiliary(jazmin)\nHeralded(rafe)\nAuxiliary(pearle)\nDevise(carlotta, jazmin)\nforall x (Heralded(x) -> Subtend(x, jazmin))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, jazmin) -> Devise(jazmin, pearle))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, carlotta) -> Devise(carlotta, jazmin))\nAuxiliary(jazmin) -> Devise(jazmin, carlotta)\nforall x (Subtend(x, jazmin) -> Deodorise(x, pearle))\nforall x (Deodorise(x, pearle) -> Heralded(pearle))\n\nAuxiliary(jazmin)\n\ntherefore Auxiliary(jazmin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The sanderson is voluminous. The skipper is zoic. The vibhu is voluminous. The briana alligator the sanderson. If something is zoic then it encode the sanderson. If something quarantine the sanderson then the sanderson alligator the vibhu. If something quarantine the briana then the briana alligator the sanderson. If the sanderson is voluminous then the sanderson alligator the briana. If something encode the sanderson then it quarantine the vibhu. If something quarantine the vibhu then the vibhu is zoic. The sanderson is not voluminous.", "logic": "\nVoluminous(sanderson)\nZoic(skipper)\nVoluminous(vibhu)\nAlligator(briana, sanderson)\nforall x (Zoic(x) -> Encode(x, sanderson))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, sanderson) -> Alligator(sanderson, vibhu))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, briana) -> Alligator(briana, sanderson))\nVoluminous(sanderson) -> Alligator(sanderson, briana)\nforall x (Encode(x, sanderson) -> Quarantine(x, vibhu))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, vibhu) -> Zoic(vibhu))\n\nnot Voluminous(sanderson)\n\ntherefore Voluminous(sanderson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The judas is vaccinated. The chad is plushy. The kelci is vaccinated. The willem initiate the judas. If something is plushy then it intercept the judas. If something purvey the judas then the judas initiate the kelci. If something purvey the willem then the willem initiate the judas. If the judas is vaccinated then the judas initiate the willem. If something intercept the judas then it purvey the kelci. If something purvey the kelci then the kelci is plushy. The judas initiate the willem.", "logic": "\nVaccinated(judas)\nPlushy(chad)\nVaccinated(kelci)\nInitiate(willem, judas)\nforall x (Plushy(x) -> Intercept(x, judas))\nforall x (Purvey(x, judas) -> Initiate(judas, kelci))\nforall x (Purvey(x, willem) -> Initiate(willem, judas))\nVaccinated(judas) -> Initiate(judas, willem)\nforall x (Intercept(x, judas) -> Purvey(x, kelci))\nforall x (Purvey(x, kelci) -> Plushy(kelci))\n\nInitiate(judas, willem)\n\nVaccinated(judas) and Vaccinated(judas) -> Initiate(judas, willem) -> therefore Initiate(judas, willem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The shannan is gallant. The jacqui is taxable. The lindsy is gallant. The paule burr the shannan. If something is taxable then it state the shannan. If something interlace the shannan then the shannan burr the lindsy. If something interlace the paule then the paule burr the shannan. If the shannan is gallant then the shannan burr the paule. If something state the shannan then it interlace the lindsy. If something interlace the lindsy then the lindsy is taxable. The shannan does not see the paule.", "logic": "\nGallant(shannan)\nTaxable(jacqui)\nGallant(lindsy)\nBurr(paule, shannan)\nforall x (Taxable(x) -> State(x, shannan))\nforall x (Interlace(x, shannan) -> Burr(shannan, lindsy))\nforall x (Interlace(x, paule) -> Burr(paule, shannan))\nGallant(shannan) -> Burr(shannan, paule)\nforall x (State(x, shannan) -> Interlace(x, lindsy))\nforall x (Interlace(x, lindsy) -> Taxable(lindsy))\n\nnot Burr(shannan, paule)\n\nGallant(shannan) and Gallant(shannan) -> Burr(shannan, paule) -> therefore Burr(shannan, paule)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The shanan is spindly. The ardelis is categoric. The dolley is spindly. The mozelle blacklead the shanan. If something is categoric then it lobby the shanan. If something peculate the shanan then the shanan blacklead the dolley. If something peculate the mozelle then the mozelle blacklead the shanan. If the shanan is spindly then the shanan blacklead the mozelle. If something lobby the shanan then it peculate the dolley. If something peculate the dolley then the dolley is categoric. The ardelis peculate the dolley.", "logic": "\nSpindly(shanan)\nCategoric(ardelis)\nSpindly(dolley)\nBlacklead(mozelle, shanan)\nforall x (Categoric(x) -> Lobby(x, shanan))\nforall x (Peculate(x, shanan) -> Blacklead(shanan, dolley))\nforall x (Peculate(x, mozelle) -> Blacklead(mozelle, shanan))\nSpindly(shanan) -> Blacklead(shanan, mozelle)\nforall x (Lobby(x, shanan) -> Peculate(x, dolley))\nforall x (Peculate(x, dolley) -> Categoric(dolley))\n\nPeculate(ardelis, dolley)\n\nCategoric(ardelis) and forall x (Categoric(x) -> Lobby(x, shanan)) -> therefore Lobby(ardelis, shanan) Lobby(ardelis, shanan) and forall x (Lobby(x, shanan) -> Peculate(x, dolley)) -> therefore Peculate(ardelis, dolley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The myrta is lengthwise. The netta is sunk. The zaria is lengthwise. The bert navigate the myrta. If something is sunk then it fluster the myrta. If something howl the myrta then the myrta navigate the zaria. If something howl the bert then the bert navigate the myrta. If the myrta is lengthwise then the myrta navigate the bert. If something fluster the myrta then it howl the zaria. If something howl the zaria then the zaria is sunk. The netta does not chase the zaria.", "logic": "\nLengthwise(myrta)\nSunk(netta)\nLengthwise(zaria)\nNavigate(bert, myrta)\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Fluster(x, myrta))\nforall x (Howl(x, myrta) -> Navigate(myrta, zaria))\nforall x (Howl(x, bert) -> Navigate(bert, myrta))\nLengthwise(myrta) -> Navigate(myrta, bert)\nforall x (Fluster(x, myrta) -> Howl(x, zaria))\nforall x (Howl(x, zaria) -> Sunk(zaria))\n\nnot Howl(netta, zaria)\n\nSunk(netta) and forall x (Sunk(x) -> Fluster(x, myrta)) -> therefore Fluster(netta, myrta) Fluster(netta, myrta) and forall x (Fluster(x, myrta) -> Howl(x, zaria)) -> therefore Howl(netta, zaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The milicent is appeasable. The ignacio is sunless. The davin is appeasable. The deanna parch the milicent. If something is sunless then it minify the milicent. If something unman the milicent then the milicent parch the davin. If something unman the deanna then the deanna parch the milicent. If the milicent is appeasable then the milicent parch the deanna. If something minify the milicent then it unman the davin. If something unman the davin then the davin is sunless. The davin is sunless.", "logic": "\nAppeasable(milicent)\nSunless(ignacio)\nAppeasable(davin)\nParch(deanna, milicent)\nforall x (Sunless(x) -> Minify(x, milicent))\nforall x (Unman(x, milicent) -> Parch(milicent, davin))\nforall x (Unman(x, deanna) -> Parch(deanna, milicent))\nAppeasable(milicent) -> Parch(milicent, deanna)\nforall x (Minify(x, milicent) -> Unman(x, davin))\nforall x (Unman(x, davin) -> Sunless(davin))\n\nSunless(davin)\n\nSunless(ignacio) and forall x (Sunless(x) -> Minify(x, milicent)) -> therefore Minify(ignacio, milicent) Minify(ignacio, milicent) and forall x (Minify(x, milicent) -> Unman(x, davin)) -> therefore Unman(ignacio, davin) Unman(ignacio, davin) and forall x (Unman(x, davin) -> Sunless(davin)) -> therefore Sunless(davin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The marcelia is synthetic. The hasheem is xliii. The moss is synthetic. The wade breach the marcelia. If something is xliii then it exudate the marcelia. If something palisade the marcelia then the marcelia breach the moss. If something palisade the wade then the wade breach the marcelia. If the marcelia is synthetic then the marcelia breach the wade. If something exudate the marcelia then it palisade the moss. If something palisade the moss then the moss is xliii. The moss is not xliii.", "logic": "\nSynthetic(marcelia)\nXliii(hasheem)\nSynthetic(moss)\nBreach(wade, marcelia)\nforall x (Xliii(x) -> Exudate(x, marcelia))\nforall x (Palisade(x, marcelia) -> Breach(marcelia, moss))\nforall x (Palisade(x, wade) -> Breach(wade, marcelia))\nSynthetic(marcelia) -> Breach(marcelia, wade)\nforall x (Exudate(x, marcelia) -> Palisade(x, moss))\nforall x (Palisade(x, moss) -> Xliii(moss))\n\nnot Xliii(moss)\n\nXliii(hasheem) and forall x (Xliii(x) -> Exudate(x, marcelia)) -> therefore Exudate(hasheem, marcelia) Exudate(hasheem, marcelia) and forall x (Exudate(x, marcelia) -> Palisade(x, moss)) -> therefore Palisade(hasheem, moss) Palisade(hasheem, moss) and forall x (Palisade(x, moss) -> Xliii(moss)) -> therefore Xliii(moss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The charline is fleet. The cassandra is sibylline. The kittie is fleet. The stoddard garnishee the charline. If something is sibylline then it entail the charline. If something mortise the charline then the charline garnishee the kittie. If something mortise the stoddard then the stoddard garnishee the charline. If the charline is fleet then the charline garnishee the stoddard. If something entail the charline then it mortise the kittie. If something mortise the kittie then the kittie is sibylline. The charline does not eat the charline.", "logic": "\nFleet(charline)\nSibylline(cassandra)\nFleet(kittie)\nGarnishee(stoddard, charline)\nforall x (Sibylline(x) -> Entail(x, charline))\nforall x (Mortise(x, charline) -> Garnishee(charline, kittie))\nforall x (Mortise(x, stoddard) -> Garnishee(stoddard, charline))\nFleet(charline) -> Garnishee(charline, stoddard)\nforall x (Entail(x, charline) -> Mortise(x, kittie))\nforall x (Mortise(x, kittie) -> Sibylline(kittie))\n\nnot Entail(charline, charline)\n\nforall x (Sibylline(x) -> Entail(x, charline)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The lacey is lendable. The ardene is cursive. The emelina is lendable. The darci front the lacey. If something is cursive then it think the lacey. If something cinch the lacey then the lacey front the emelina. If something cinch the darci then the darci front the lacey. If the lacey is lendable then the lacey front the darci. If something think the lacey then it cinch the emelina. If something cinch the emelina then the emelina is cursive. The darci think the lacey.", "logic": "\nLendable(lacey)\nCursive(ardene)\nLendable(emelina)\nFront(darci, lacey)\nforall x (Cursive(x) -> Think(x, lacey))\nforall x (Cinch(x, lacey) -> Front(lacey, emelina))\nforall x (Cinch(x, darci) -> Front(darci, lacey))\nLendable(lacey) -> Front(lacey, darci)\nforall x (Think(x, lacey) -> Cinch(x, emelina))\nforall x (Cinch(x, emelina) -> Cursive(emelina))\n\nThink(darci, lacey)\n\nforall x (Cursive(x) -> Think(x, lacey)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The horacio is deictic. The raina is limber. The jerrome is deictic. The karilynn keel the horacio. If something is limber then it enumerate the horacio. If something aggroup the horacio then the horacio keel the jerrome. If something aggroup the karilynn then the karilynn keel the horacio. If the horacio is deictic then the horacio keel the karilynn. If something enumerate the horacio then it aggroup the jerrome. If something aggroup the jerrome then the jerrome is limber. The karilynn does not chase the jerrome.", "logic": "\nDeictic(horacio)\nLimber(raina)\nDeictic(jerrome)\nKeel(karilynn, horacio)\nforall x (Limber(x) -> Enumerate(x, horacio))\nforall x (Aggroup(x, horacio) -> Keel(horacio, jerrome))\nforall x (Aggroup(x, karilynn) -> Keel(karilynn, horacio))\nDeictic(horacio) -> Keel(horacio, karilynn)\nforall x (Enumerate(x, horacio) -> Aggroup(x, jerrome))\nforall x (Aggroup(x, jerrome) -> Limber(jerrome))\n\nnot Aggroup(karilynn, jerrome)\n\nforall x (Enumerate(x, horacio) -> Aggroup(x, jerrome)) <- forall x (Limber(x) -> Enumerate(x, horacio)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The drew is pathetic. The emera is ungroomed. The julieta is pathetic. The mercie notify the drew. If something is ungroomed then it recede the drew. If something forearm the drew then the drew notify the julieta. If something forearm the mercie then the mercie notify the drew. If the drew is pathetic then the drew notify the mercie. If something recede the drew then it forearm the julieta. If something forearm the julieta then the julieta is ungroomed. The drew forearm the julieta.", "logic": "\nPathetic(drew)\nUngroomed(emera)\nPathetic(julieta)\nNotify(mercie, drew)\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Recede(x, drew))\nforall x (Forearm(x, drew) -> Notify(drew, julieta))\nforall x (Forearm(x, mercie) -> Notify(mercie, drew))\nPathetic(drew) -> Notify(drew, mercie)\nforall x (Recede(x, drew) -> Forearm(x, julieta))\nforall x (Forearm(x, julieta) -> Ungroomed(julieta))\n\nForearm(drew, julieta)\n\nforall x (Recede(x, drew) -> Forearm(x, julieta)) <- forall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Recede(x, drew)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The maxine is unmilitary. The peter is lysogenic. The joceline is unmilitary. The sari trephine the maxine. If something is lysogenic then it misread the maxine. If something target the maxine then the maxine trephine the joceline. If something target the sari then the sari trephine the maxine. If the maxine is unmilitary then the maxine trephine the sari. If something misread the maxine then it target the joceline. If something target the joceline then the joceline is lysogenic. The sari does not eat the peter.", "logic": "\nUnmilitary(maxine)\nLysogenic(peter)\nUnmilitary(joceline)\nTrephine(sari, maxine)\nforall x (Lysogenic(x) -> Misread(x, maxine))\nforall x (Target(x, maxine) -> Trephine(maxine, joceline))\nforall x (Target(x, sari) -> Trephine(sari, maxine))\nUnmilitary(maxine) -> Trephine(maxine, sari)\nforall x (Misread(x, maxine) -> Target(x, joceline))\nforall x (Target(x, joceline) -> Lysogenic(joceline))\n\nnot Misread(sari, peter)\n\nnot Misread(sari, peter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The nick is uneven. The christean is selective. The koral is uneven. The gaby posture the nick. If something is selective then it hopple the nick. If something sublet the nick then the nick posture the koral. If something sublet the gaby then the gaby posture the nick. If the nick is uneven then the nick posture the gaby. If something hopple the nick then it sublet the koral. If something sublet the koral then the koral is selective. The nick is kind.", "logic": "\nUneven(nick)\nSelective(christean)\nUneven(koral)\nPosture(gaby, nick)\nforall x (Selective(x) -> Hopple(x, nick))\nforall x (Sublet(x, nick) -> Posture(nick, koral))\nforall x (Sublet(x, gaby) -> Posture(gaby, nick))\nUneven(nick) -> Posture(nick, gaby)\nforall x (Hopple(x, nick) -> Sublet(x, koral))\nforall x (Sublet(x, koral) -> Selective(koral))\n\nKind(nick)\n\nKind(nick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The frederick is caliginous. The wittie is harmonious. The renaud is caliginous. The agamemnon jolt the frederick. If something is harmonious then it satirize the frederick. If something suffix the frederick then the frederick jolt the renaud. If something suffix the agamemnon then the agamemnon jolt the frederick. If the frederick is caliginous then the frederick jolt the agamemnon. If something satirize the frederick then it suffix the renaud. If something suffix the renaud then the renaud is harmonious. The renaud does not eat the agamemnon.", "logic": "\nCaliginous(frederick)\nHarmonious(wittie)\nCaliginous(renaud)\nJolt(agamemnon, frederick)\nforall x (Harmonious(x) -> Satirize(x, frederick))\nforall x (Suffix(x, frederick) -> Jolt(frederick, renaud))\nforall x (Suffix(x, agamemnon) -> Jolt(agamemnon, frederick))\nCaliginous(frederick) -> Jolt(frederick, agamemnon)\nforall x (Satirize(x, frederick) -> Suffix(x, renaud))\nforall x (Suffix(x, renaud) -> Harmonious(renaud))\n\nnot Satirize(renaud, agamemnon)\n\nnot Satirize(renaud, agamemnon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The magdaia is unsheared. The zea is olfactive. The mathias is unsheared. The galen reseed the magdaia. If something is olfactive then it decimate the magdaia. If something fudge the magdaia then the magdaia reseed the mathias. If something fudge the galen then the galen reseed the magdaia. If the magdaia is unsheared then the magdaia reseed the galen. If something decimate the magdaia then it fudge the mathias. If something fudge the mathias then the mathias is olfactive. The galen reseed the zea.", "logic": "\nUnsheared(magdaia)\nOlfactive(zea)\nUnsheared(mathias)\nReseed(galen, magdaia)\nforall x (Olfactive(x) -> Decimate(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Fudge(x, magdaia) -> Reseed(magdaia, mathias))\nforall x (Fudge(x, galen) -> Reseed(galen, magdaia))\nUnsheared(magdaia) -> Reseed(magdaia, galen)\nforall x (Decimate(x, magdaia) -> Fudge(x, mathias))\nforall x (Fudge(x, mathias) -> Olfactive(mathias))\n\nReseed(galen, zea)\n\nReseed(galen, zea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The henrique transfuse the shadow. The henrique jive the shadow. The henrique is deviant. The henrique is sellable. The henrique is broached. The henrique is ungoverned. The henrique choir the shadow. The shadow transfuse the henrique. The shadow jive the henrique. The shadow is deviant. The shadow is sellable. The shadow choir the henrique. If someone choir the henrique and they are sellable then the henrique transfuse the shadow. If the shadow choir the henrique then the shadow is sellable. If someone choir the henrique then the henrique jive the shadow. The henrique choir the shadow.", "logic": "\nTransfuse(henrique, shadow)\nJive(henrique, shadow)\nDeviant(henrique)\nSellable(henrique)\nBroached(henrique)\nUngoverned(henrique)\nChoir(henrique, shadow)\nTransfuse(shadow, henrique)\nJive(shadow, henrique)\nDeviant(shadow)\nSellable(shadow)\nChoir(shadow, henrique)\nforall x (Choir(x, henrique) and Sellable(x) -> Transfuse(henrique, shadow))\nChoir(shadow, henrique) -> Sellable(shadow)\nforall x (Choir(x, henrique) -> Jive(henrique, shadow))\n\nChoir(henrique, shadow)\n\ntherefore Choir(henrique, shadow)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3679"} {"premises": "The sarina happen the glen. The sarina boob the glen. The sarina is detested. The sarina is unhearing. The sarina is inerrant. The sarina is locomotive. The sarina gelatinize the glen. The glen happen the sarina. The glen boob the sarina. The glen is detested. The glen is unhearing. The glen gelatinize the sarina. If someone gelatinize the sarina and they are unhearing then the sarina happen the glen. If the glen gelatinize the sarina then the glen is unhearing. If someone gelatinize the sarina then the sarina boob the glen. The sarina is not detested.", "logic": "\nHappen(sarina, glen)\nBoob(sarina, glen)\nDetested(sarina)\nUnhearing(sarina)\nInerrant(sarina)\nLocomotive(sarina)\nGelatinize(sarina, glen)\nHappen(glen, sarina)\nBoob(glen, sarina)\nDetested(glen)\nUnhearing(glen)\nGelatinize(glen, sarina)\nforall x (Gelatinize(x, sarina) and Unhearing(x) -> Happen(sarina, glen))\nGelatinize(glen, sarina) -> Unhearing(glen)\nforall x (Gelatinize(x, sarina) -> Boob(sarina, glen))\n\nnot Detested(sarina)\n\ntherefore Detested(sarina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3679"} {"premises": "The blakelee focalize the quincy. The blakelee innervate the quincy. The blakelee is atypical. The blakelee is tactical. The blakelee is malformed. The blakelee is unmodified. The blakelee waffle the quincy. The quincy focalize the blakelee. The quincy innervate the blakelee. The quincy is atypical. The quincy is tactical. The quincy waffle the blakelee. If someone waffle the blakelee and they are tactical then the blakelee focalize the quincy. If the quincy waffle the blakelee then the quincy is tactical. If someone waffle the blakelee then the blakelee innervate the quincy. The quincy is not young.", "logic": "\nFocalize(blakelee, quincy)\nInnervate(blakelee, quincy)\nAtypical(blakelee)\nTactical(blakelee)\nMalformed(blakelee)\nUnmodified(blakelee)\nWaffle(blakelee, quincy)\nFocalize(quincy, blakelee)\nInnervate(quincy, blakelee)\nAtypical(quincy)\nTactical(quincy)\nWaffle(quincy, blakelee)\nforall x (Waffle(x, blakelee) and Tactical(x) -> Focalize(blakelee, quincy))\nWaffle(quincy, blakelee) -> Tactical(quincy)\nforall x (Waffle(x, blakelee) -> Innervate(blakelee, quincy))\n\nnot Young(quincy)\n\nnot Young(quincy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3679"} {"premises": "The gwendolen whomp the emil. The gwendolen reclaim the emil. The gwendolen is infrared. The gwendolen is rational. The gwendolen is furious. The gwendolen is tangential. The gwendolen tilt the emil. The emil whomp the gwendolen. The emil reclaim the gwendolen. The emil is infrared. The emil is rational. The emil tilt the gwendolen. If someone tilt the gwendolen and they are rational then the gwendolen whomp the emil. If the emil tilt the gwendolen then the emil is rational. If someone tilt the gwendolen then the gwendolen reclaim the emil. The gwendolen reclaim the gwendolen.", "logic": "\nWhomp(gwendolen, emil)\nReclaim(gwendolen, emil)\nInfrared(gwendolen)\nRational(gwendolen)\nFurious(gwendolen)\nTangential(gwendolen)\nTilt(gwendolen, emil)\nWhomp(emil, gwendolen)\nReclaim(emil, gwendolen)\nInfrared(emil)\nRational(emil)\nTilt(emil, gwendolen)\nforall x (Tilt(x, gwendolen) and Rational(x) -> Whomp(gwendolen, emil))\nTilt(emil, gwendolen) -> Rational(emil)\nforall x (Tilt(x, gwendolen) -> Reclaim(gwendolen, emil))\n\nReclaim(gwendolen, gwendolen)\n\nReclaim(gwendolen, gwendolen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3679"} {"premises": "Bekki is normal. Bekki is unliveable. Bekki is bullish. Bekki is equal. Bekki is leonine. Bekki is socialized. Joya is normal. Joya is bullish. Joya is equal. Joya is socialized. Round, normal people are leonine. If someone is equal and unliveable then they are fiendish. All normal, leonine people are unliveable. Bekki is leonine.", "logic": "\nNormal(bekki)\nUnliveable(bekki)\nBullish(bekki)\nEqual(bekki)\nLeonine(bekki)\nSocialized(bekki)\nNormal(joya)\nBullish(joya)\nEqual(joya)\nSocialized(joya)\nforall x (Equal(x) and Normal(x) -> Leonine(x))\nforall x (Equal(x) and Unliveable(x) -> Fiendish(x))\nforall x (Normal(x) and Leonine(x) -> Unliveable(x))\n\nLeonine(bekki)\n\ntherefore Leonine(bekki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Ambrose is ingrained. Ambrose is swaybacked. Ambrose is xvii. Ambrose is sheathed. Ambrose is moresque. Ambrose is haggard. Tia is ingrained. Tia is xvii. Tia is sheathed. Tia is haggard. Round, ingrained people are moresque. If someone is sheathed and swaybacked then they are cuboid. All ingrained, moresque people are swaybacked. Ambrose is not haggard.", "logic": "\nIngrained(ambrose)\nSwaybacked(ambrose)\nXvii(ambrose)\nSheathed(ambrose)\nMoresque(ambrose)\nHaggard(ambrose)\nIngrained(tia)\nXvii(tia)\nSheathed(tia)\nHaggard(tia)\nforall x (Sheathed(x) and Ingrained(x) -> Moresque(x))\nforall x (Sheathed(x) and Swaybacked(x) -> Cuboid(x))\nforall x (Ingrained(x) and Moresque(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\n\nnot Haggard(ambrose)\n\ntherefore Haggard(ambrose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Marlane is toothy. Marlane is risen. Marlane is unposed. Marlane is opaque. Marlane is colour. Marlane is unharmed. Dea is toothy. Dea is unposed. Dea is opaque. Dea is unharmed. Round, toothy people are colour. If someone is opaque and risen then they are alopecic. All toothy, colour people are risen. Dea is colour.", "logic": "\nToothy(marlane)\nRisen(marlane)\nUnposed(marlane)\nOpaque(marlane)\nColour(marlane)\nUnharmed(marlane)\nToothy(dea)\nUnposed(dea)\nOpaque(dea)\nUnharmed(dea)\nforall x (Opaque(x) and Toothy(x) -> Colour(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) and Risen(x) -> Alopecic(x))\nforall x (Toothy(x) and Colour(x) -> Risen(x))\n\nColour(dea)\n\nOpaque(dea) and Toothy(dea) and forall x (Opaque(x) and Toothy(x) -> Colour(x)) -> therefore Colour(dea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Fredrika is transpolar. Fredrika is hardbound. Fredrika is egoistical. Fredrika is monoploid. Fredrika is polyphase. Fredrika is trembling. Lemmie is transpolar. Lemmie is egoistical. Lemmie is monoploid. Lemmie is trembling. Round, transpolar people are polyphase. If someone is monoploid and hardbound then they are rupestral. All transpolar, polyphase people are hardbound. Lemmie is not polyphase.", "logic": "\nTranspolar(fredrika)\nHardbound(fredrika)\nEgoistical(fredrika)\nMonoploid(fredrika)\nPolyphase(fredrika)\nTrembling(fredrika)\nTranspolar(lemmie)\nEgoistical(lemmie)\nMonoploid(lemmie)\nTrembling(lemmie)\nforall x (Monoploid(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Polyphase(x))\nforall x (Monoploid(x) and Hardbound(x) -> Rupestral(x))\nforall x (Transpolar(x) and Polyphase(x) -> Hardbound(x))\n\nnot Polyphase(lemmie)\n\nMonoploid(lemmie) and Transpolar(lemmie) and forall x (Monoploid(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Polyphase(x)) -> therefore Polyphase(lemmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Lucille is adscripted. Lucille is next. Lucille is zoophagous. Lucille is digestible. Lucille is asphaltic. Lucille is nosed. Gaynor is adscripted. Gaynor is zoophagous. Gaynor is digestible. Gaynor is nosed. Round, adscripted people are asphaltic. If someone is digestible and next then they are funicular. All adscripted, asphaltic people are next. Gaynor is next.", "logic": "\nAdscripted(lucille)\nNext(lucille)\nZoophagous(lucille)\nDigestible(lucille)\nAsphaltic(lucille)\nNosed(lucille)\nAdscripted(gaynor)\nZoophagous(gaynor)\nDigestible(gaynor)\nNosed(gaynor)\nforall x (Digestible(x) and Adscripted(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\nforall x (Digestible(x) and Next(x) -> Funicular(x))\nforall x (Adscripted(x) and Asphaltic(x) -> Next(x))\n\nNext(gaynor)\n\nDigestible(gaynor) and Adscripted(gaynor) and forall x (Digestible(x) and Adscripted(x) -> Asphaltic(x)) -> therefore Asphaltic(gaynor) Adscripted(gaynor) and Asphaltic(gaynor) and forall x (Adscripted(x) and Asphaltic(x) -> Next(x)) -> therefore Next(gaynor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Vena is profound. Vena is prophetic. Vena is arid. Vena is automated. Vena is paleozoic. Vena is cheating. Billi is profound. Billi is arid. Billi is automated. Billi is cheating. Round, profound people are paleozoic. If someone is automated and prophetic then they are inexpiable. All profound, paleozoic people are prophetic. Billi is not prophetic.", "logic": "\nProfound(vena)\nProphetic(vena)\nArid(vena)\nAutomated(vena)\nPaleozoic(vena)\nCheating(vena)\nProfound(billi)\nArid(billi)\nAutomated(billi)\nCheating(billi)\nforall x (Automated(x) and Profound(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Prophetic(x) -> Inexpiable(x))\nforall x (Profound(x) and Paleozoic(x) -> Prophetic(x))\n\nnot Prophetic(billi)\n\nAutomated(billi) and Profound(billi) and forall x (Automated(x) and Profound(x) -> Paleozoic(x)) -> therefore Paleozoic(billi) Profound(billi) and Paleozoic(billi) and forall x (Profound(x) and Paleozoic(x) -> Prophetic(x)) -> therefore Prophetic(billi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Osgood is evil. Osgood is tactile. Osgood is uxorial. Osgood is amylaceous. Osgood is leaky. Osgood is searching. Krystal is evil. Krystal is uxorial. Krystal is amylaceous. Krystal is searching. Round, evil people are leaky. If someone is amylaceous and tactile then they are amicable. All evil, leaky people are tactile. Krystal is amicable.", "logic": "\nEvil(osgood)\nTactile(osgood)\nUxorial(osgood)\nAmylaceous(osgood)\nLeaky(osgood)\nSearching(osgood)\nEvil(krystal)\nUxorial(krystal)\nAmylaceous(krystal)\nSearching(krystal)\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) and Evil(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) and Tactile(x) -> Amicable(x))\nforall x (Evil(x) and Leaky(x) -> Tactile(x))\n\nAmicable(krystal)\n\nAmylaceous(krystal) and Evil(krystal) and forall x (Amylaceous(x) and Evil(x) -> Leaky(x)) -> therefore Leaky(krystal) Evil(krystal) and Leaky(krystal) and forall x (Evil(x) and Leaky(x) -> Tactile(x)) -> therefore Tactile(krystal) Amylaceous(krystal) and Tactile(krystal) and forall x (Amylaceous(x) and Tactile(x) -> Amicable(x)) -> therefore Amicable(krystal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Flem is mouthlike. Flem is vulpecular. Flem is accursed. Flem is shaping. Flem is appraising. Flem is unfearing. Erinna is mouthlike. Erinna is accursed. Erinna is shaping. Erinna is unfearing. Round, mouthlike people are appraising. If someone is shaping and vulpecular then they are excessive. All mouthlike, appraising people are vulpecular. Erinna is not excessive.", "logic": "\nMouthlike(flem)\nVulpecular(flem)\nAccursed(flem)\nShaping(flem)\nAppraising(flem)\nUnfearing(flem)\nMouthlike(erinna)\nAccursed(erinna)\nShaping(erinna)\nUnfearing(erinna)\nforall x (Shaping(x) and Mouthlike(x) -> Appraising(x))\nforall x (Shaping(x) and Vulpecular(x) -> Excessive(x))\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) and Appraising(x) -> Vulpecular(x))\n\nnot Excessive(erinna)\n\nShaping(erinna) and Mouthlike(erinna) and forall x (Shaping(x) and Mouthlike(x) -> Appraising(x)) -> therefore Appraising(erinna) Mouthlike(erinna) and Appraising(erinna) and forall x (Mouthlike(x) and Appraising(x) -> Vulpecular(x)) -> therefore Vulpecular(erinna) Shaping(erinna) and Vulpecular(erinna) and forall x (Shaping(x) and Vulpecular(x) -> Excessive(x)) -> therefore Excessive(erinna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "The alexa prescribe the noellyn. The noellyn is mundane. If someone casket the noellyn then they need the alexa. If someone prescribe the alexa then the alexa casket the noellyn. If someone is mundane then they see the alexa. The alexa prescribe the noellyn.", "logic": "\nPrescribe(alexa, noellyn)\nMundane(noellyn)\nforall x (Casket(x, noellyn) -> Casket(x, alexa))\nforall x (Prescribe(x, alexa) -> Casket(alexa, noellyn))\nforall x (Mundane(x) -> Prescribe(x, alexa))\n\nPrescribe(alexa, noellyn)\n\ntherefore Prescribe(alexa, noellyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The susann pickle the mora. The mora is scalloped. If someone slight the mora then they need the susann. If someone pickle the susann then the susann slight the mora. If someone is scalloped then they see the susann. The susann does not see the mora.", "logic": "\nPickle(susann, mora)\nScalloped(mora)\nforall x (Slight(x, mora) -> Slight(x, susann))\nforall x (Pickle(x, susann) -> Slight(susann, mora))\nforall x (Scalloped(x) -> Pickle(x, susann))\n\nnot Pickle(susann, mora)\n\ntherefore Pickle(susann, mora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The stuart burrow the elladine. The elladine is exterior. If someone buoy the elladine then they need the stuart. If someone burrow the stuart then the stuart buoy the elladine. If someone is exterior then they see the stuart. The elladine burrow the stuart.", "logic": "\nBurrow(stuart, elladine)\nExterior(elladine)\nforall x (Buoy(x, elladine) -> Buoy(x, stuart))\nforall x (Burrow(x, stuart) -> Buoy(stuart, elladine))\nforall x (Exterior(x) -> Burrow(x, stuart))\n\nBurrow(elladine, stuart)\n\nExterior(elladine) and forall x (Exterior(x) -> Burrow(x, stuart)) -> therefore Burrow(elladine, stuart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The rand match the suzetta. The suzetta is fewer. If someone unteach the suzetta then they need the rand. If someone match the rand then the rand unteach the suzetta. If someone is fewer then they see the rand. The suzetta does not see the rand.", "logic": "\nMatch(rand, suzetta)\nFewer(suzetta)\nforall x (Unteach(x, suzetta) -> Unteach(x, rand))\nforall x (Match(x, rand) -> Unteach(rand, suzetta))\nforall x (Fewer(x) -> Match(x, rand))\n\nnot Match(suzetta, rand)\n\nFewer(suzetta) and forall x (Fewer(x) -> Match(x, rand)) -> therefore Match(suzetta, rand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The hinda harden the mason. The mason is calceolate. If someone abdicate the mason then they need the hinda. If someone harden the hinda then the hinda abdicate the mason. If someone is calceolate then they see the hinda. The hinda abdicate the mason.", "logic": "\nHarden(hinda, mason)\nCalceolate(mason)\nforall x (Abdicate(x, mason) -> Abdicate(x, hinda))\nforall x (Harden(x, hinda) -> Abdicate(hinda, mason))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) -> Harden(x, hinda))\n\nAbdicate(hinda, mason)\n\nCalceolate(mason) and forall x (Calceolate(x) -> Harden(x, hinda)) -> therefore Harden(mason, hinda) Harden(mason, hinda) and forall x (Harden(x, hinda) -> Abdicate(hinda, mason)) -> therefore Abdicate(hinda, mason)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The tella debit the myrtie. The myrtie is concordant. If someone denominate the myrtie then they need the tella. If someone debit the tella then the tella denominate the myrtie. If someone is concordant then they see the tella. The tella does not need the myrtie.", "logic": "\nDebit(tella, myrtie)\nConcordant(myrtie)\nforall x (Denominate(x, myrtie) -> Denominate(x, tella))\nforall x (Debit(x, tella) -> Denominate(tella, myrtie))\nforall x (Concordant(x) -> Debit(x, tella))\n\nnot Denominate(tella, myrtie)\n\nConcordant(myrtie) and forall x (Concordant(x) -> Debit(x, tella)) -> therefore Debit(myrtie, tella) Debit(myrtie, tella) and forall x (Debit(x, tella) -> Denominate(tella, myrtie)) -> therefore Denominate(tella, myrtie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The corri abide the windy. The windy is level. If someone glue the windy then they need the corri. If someone abide the corri then the corri glue the windy. If someone is level then they see the corri. The corri does not see the corri.", "logic": "\nAbide(corri, windy)\nLevel(windy)\nforall x (Glue(x, windy) -> Glue(x, corri))\nforall x (Abide(x, corri) -> Glue(corri, windy))\nforall x (Level(x) -> Abide(x, corri))\n\nnot Abide(corri, corri)\n\nforall x (Level(x) -> Abide(x, corri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The berget scurry the dorey. The dorey is azotemic. If someone carburize the dorey then they need the berget. If someone scurry the berget then the berget carburize the dorey. If someone is azotemic then they see the berget. The dorey carburize the berget.", "logic": "\nScurry(berget, dorey)\nAzotemic(dorey)\nforall x (Carburize(x, dorey) -> Carburize(x, berget))\nforall x (Scurry(x, berget) -> Carburize(berget, dorey))\nforall x (Azotemic(x) -> Scurry(x, berget))\n\nCarburize(dorey, berget)\n\nforall x (Carburize(x, dorey) -> Carburize(x, berget)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The mead lust the nancey. The nancey is unwavering. If someone ionize the nancey then they need the mead. If someone lust the mead then the mead ionize the nancey. If someone is unwavering then they see the mead. The nancey is not blue.", "logic": "\nLust(mead, nancey)\nUnwavering(nancey)\nforall x (Ionize(x, nancey) -> Ionize(x, mead))\nforall x (Lust(x, mead) -> Ionize(mead, nancey))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> Lust(x, mead))\n\nnot Blue(nancey)\n\nnot Blue(nancey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The vonny fellate the marshall. The marshall is crude. If someone undock the marshall then they need the vonny. If someone fellate the vonny then the vonny undock the marshall. If someone is crude then they see the vonny. The vonny is crude.", "logic": "\nFellate(vonny, marshall)\nCrude(marshall)\nforall x (Undock(x, marshall) -> Undock(x, vonny))\nforall x (Fellate(x, vonny) -> Undock(vonny, marshall))\nforall x (Crude(x) -> Fellate(x, vonny))\n\nCrude(vonny)\n\nCrude(vonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The bonny overleap the morissa. The morissa is phrenetic. If someone initiate the morissa then they need the bonny. If someone overleap the bonny then the bonny initiate the morissa. If someone is phrenetic then they see the bonny. The morissa is not big.", "logic": "\nOverleap(bonny, morissa)\nPhrenetic(morissa)\nforall x (Initiate(x, morissa) -> Initiate(x, bonny))\nforall x (Overleap(x, bonny) -> Initiate(bonny, morissa))\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) -> Overleap(x, bonny))\n\nnot Big(morissa)\n\nnot Big(morissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "The murdock signalise the ruthe. The ruthe is daft. If someone jangle the ruthe then they need the murdock. If someone signalise the murdock then the murdock jangle the ruthe. If someone is daft then they see the murdock. The ruthe visits the ruthe.", "logic": "\nSignalise(murdock, ruthe)\nDaft(ruthe)\nforall x (Jangle(x, ruthe) -> Jangle(x, murdock))\nforall x (Signalise(x, murdock) -> Jangle(murdock, ruthe))\nforall x (Daft(x) -> Signalise(x, murdock))\n\nVisits(ruthe, ruthe)\n\nVisits(ruthe, ruthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1208"} {"premises": "Etta is variform. Etta is missing. Hannibal is nutty. Hannibal is threepenny. Hannibal is onerous. Hannibal is epidermal. Hannibal is unkept. Babette is nutty. Babette is onerous. Babette is unkept. If Hannibal is nutty then Hannibal is epidermal. All variform, epidermal people are nutty. If someone is unkept then they are variform. If Babette is unkept then Babette is threepenny. All threepenny, onerous people are epidermal. If someone is epidermal and threepenny then they are missing. Etta is missing.", "logic": "\nVariform(etta)\nMissing(etta)\nNutty(hannibal)\nThreepenny(hannibal)\nOnerous(hannibal)\nEpidermal(hannibal)\nUnkept(hannibal)\nNutty(babette)\nOnerous(babette)\nUnkept(babette)\nNutty(hannibal) -> Epidermal(hannibal)\nforall x (Variform(x) and Epidermal(x) -> Nutty(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Variform(x))\nUnkept(babette) -> Threepenny(babette)\nforall x (Threepenny(x) and Onerous(x) -> Epidermal(x))\nforall x (Epidermal(x) and Threepenny(x) -> Missing(x))\n\nMissing(etta)\n\ntherefore Missing(etta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Dorise is medial. Dorise is musical. Cecily is nettlesome. Cecily is indian. Cecily is nonechoic. Cecily is lubricated. Cecily is blonde. Niall is nettlesome. Niall is nonechoic. Niall is blonde. If Cecily is nettlesome then Cecily is lubricated. All medial, lubricated people are nettlesome. If someone is blonde then they are medial. If Niall is blonde then Niall is indian. All indian, nonechoic people are lubricated. If someone is lubricated and indian then they are musical. Cecily is not lubricated.", "logic": "\nMedial(dorise)\nMusical(dorise)\nNettlesome(cecily)\nIndian(cecily)\nNonechoic(cecily)\nLubricated(cecily)\nBlonde(cecily)\nNettlesome(niall)\nNonechoic(niall)\nBlonde(niall)\nNettlesome(cecily) -> Lubricated(cecily)\nforall x (Medial(x) and Lubricated(x) -> Nettlesome(x))\nforall x (Blonde(x) -> Medial(x))\nBlonde(niall) -> Indian(niall)\nforall x (Indian(x) and Nonechoic(x) -> Lubricated(x))\nforall x (Lubricated(x) and Indian(x) -> Musical(x))\n\nnot Lubricated(cecily)\n\ntherefore Lubricated(cecily)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Phyllys is legal. Phyllys is unshared. Josi is unreactive. Josi is advertent. Josi is preclusive. Josi is aberdonian. Josi is finite. Bishop is unreactive. Bishop is preclusive. Bishop is finite. If Josi is unreactive then Josi is aberdonian. All legal, aberdonian people are unreactive. If someone is finite then they are legal. If Bishop is finite then Bishop is advertent. All advertent, preclusive people are aberdonian. If someone is aberdonian and advertent then they are unshared. Bishop is legal.", "logic": "\nLegal(phyllys)\nUnshared(phyllys)\nUnreactive(josi)\nAdvertent(josi)\nPreclusive(josi)\nAberdonian(josi)\nFinite(josi)\nUnreactive(bishop)\nPreclusive(bishop)\nFinite(bishop)\nUnreactive(josi) -> Aberdonian(josi)\nforall x (Legal(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Finite(x) -> Legal(x))\nFinite(bishop) -> Advertent(bishop)\nforall x (Advertent(x) and Preclusive(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) and Advertent(x) -> Unshared(x))\n\nLegal(bishop)\n\nFinite(bishop) and forall x (Finite(x) -> Legal(x)) -> therefore Legal(bishop)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Hubert is untucked. Hubert is unmanful. Esmerelda is brimming. Esmerelda is autotomic. Esmerelda is shabby. Esmerelda is activated. Esmerelda is firstborn. Christos is brimming. Christos is shabby. Christos is firstborn. If Esmerelda is brimming then Esmerelda is activated. All untucked, activated people are brimming. If someone is firstborn then they are untucked. If Christos is firstborn then Christos is autotomic. All autotomic, shabby people are activated. If someone is activated and autotomic then they are unmanful. Esmerelda is not unmanful.", "logic": "\nUntucked(hubert)\nUnmanful(hubert)\nBrimming(esmerelda)\nAutotomic(esmerelda)\nShabby(esmerelda)\nActivated(esmerelda)\nFirstborn(esmerelda)\nBrimming(christos)\nShabby(christos)\nFirstborn(christos)\nBrimming(esmerelda) -> Activated(esmerelda)\nforall x (Untucked(x) and Activated(x) -> Brimming(x))\nforall x (Firstborn(x) -> Untucked(x))\nFirstborn(christos) -> Autotomic(christos)\nforall x (Autotomic(x) and Shabby(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) and Autotomic(x) -> Unmanful(x))\n\nnot Unmanful(esmerelda)\n\nActivated(esmerelda) and Autotomic(esmerelda) and forall x (Activated(x) and Autotomic(x) -> Unmanful(x)) -> therefore Unmanful(esmerelda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Staffard is existing. Staffard is alphabetic. Vannie is adulterine. Vannie is converse. Vannie is damnatory. Vannie is economical. Vannie is sultry. Lolita is adulterine. Lolita is damnatory. Lolita is sultry. If Vannie is adulterine then Vannie is economical. All existing, economical people are adulterine. If someone is sultry then they are existing. If Lolita is sultry then Lolita is converse. All converse, damnatory people are economical. If someone is economical and converse then they are alphabetic. Staffard is not adulterine.", "logic": "\nExisting(staffard)\nAlphabetic(staffard)\nAdulterine(vannie)\nConverse(vannie)\nDamnatory(vannie)\nEconomical(vannie)\nSultry(vannie)\nAdulterine(lolita)\nDamnatory(lolita)\nSultry(lolita)\nAdulterine(vannie) -> Economical(vannie)\nforall x (Existing(x) and Economical(x) -> Adulterine(x))\nforall x (Sultry(x) -> Existing(x))\nSultry(lolita) -> Converse(lolita)\nforall x (Converse(x) and Damnatory(x) -> Economical(x))\nforall x (Economical(x) and Converse(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\n\nnot Adulterine(staffard)\n\nforall x (Existing(x) and Economical(x) -> Adulterine(x)) <- forall x (Converse(x) and Damnatory(x) -> Economical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Shepard is vitiated. Shepard is baronial. Eleonore is unbearable. Eleonore is granted. Eleonore is vengeful. Eleonore is mastered. Eleonore is speedy. Erena is unbearable. Erena is vengeful. Erena is speedy. If Eleonore is unbearable then Eleonore is mastered. All vitiated, mastered people are unbearable. If someone is speedy then they are vitiated. If Erena is speedy then Erena is granted. All granted, vengeful people are mastered. If someone is mastered and granted then they are baronial. Shepard is mastered.", "logic": "\nVitiated(shepard)\nBaronial(shepard)\nUnbearable(eleonore)\nGranted(eleonore)\nVengeful(eleonore)\nMastered(eleonore)\nSpeedy(eleonore)\nUnbearable(erena)\nVengeful(erena)\nSpeedy(erena)\nUnbearable(eleonore) -> Mastered(eleonore)\nforall x (Vitiated(x) and Mastered(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Vitiated(x))\nSpeedy(erena) -> Granted(erena)\nforall x (Granted(x) and Vengeful(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) and Granted(x) -> Baronial(x))\n\nMastered(shepard)\n\nforall x (Granted(x) and Vengeful(x) -> Mastered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Bjorn is hesperian. Bjorn is mordant. Amelina is unlikeable. Amelina is incurved. Amelina is worsened. Amelina is briary. Amelina is dashing. Karolina is unlikeable. Karolina is worsened. Karolina is dashing. If Amelina is unlikeable then Amelina is briary. All hesperian, briary people are unlikeable. If someone is dashing then they are hesperian. If Karolina is dashing then Karolina is incurved. All incurved, worsened people are briary. If someone is briary and incurved then they are mordant. Bjorn is not worsened.", "logic": "\nHesperian(bjorn)\nMordant(bjorn)\nUnlikeable(amelina)\nIncurved(amelina)\nWorsened(amelina)\nBriary(amelina)\nDashing(amelina)\nUnlikeable(karolina)\nWorsened(karolina)\nDashing(karolina)\nUnlikeable(amelina) -> Briary(amelina)\nforall x (Hesperian(x) and Briary(x) -> Unlikeable(x))\nforall x (Dashing(x) -> Hesperian(x))\nDashing(karolina) -> Incurved(karolina)\nforall x (Incurved(x) and Worsened(x) -> Briary(x))\nforall x (Briary(x) and Incurved(x) -> Mordant(x))\n\nnot Worsened(bjorn)\n\nnot Worsened(bjorn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Virgie is autacoidal. Virgie is closing. Victoria is thermic. Victoria is dissected. Victoria is basilar. Victoria is driving. Victoria is needled. Lyn is thermic. Lyn is basilar. Lyn is needled. If Victoria is thermic then Victoria is driving. All autacoidal, driving people are thermic. If someone is needled then they are autacoidal. If Lyn is needled then Lyn is dissected. All dissected, basilar people are driving. If someone is driving and dissected then they are closing. Virgie is dissected.", "logic": "\nAutacoidal(virgie)\nClosing(virgie)\nThermic(victoria)\nDissected(victoria)\nBasilar(victoria)\nDriving(victoria)\nNeedled(victoria)\nThermic(lyn)\nBasilar(lyn)\nNeedled(lyn)\nThermic(victoria) -> Driving(victoria)\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) and Driving(x) -> Thermic(x))\nforall x (Needled(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\nNeedled(lyn) -> Dissected(lyn)\nforall x (Dissected(x) and Basilar(x) -> Driving(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) and Dissected(x) -> Closing(x))\n\nDissected(virgie)\n\nDissected(virgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-403"} {"premises": "Belva is inept. Belva is prenuptial. Belva is impassable. Belva is not unwoven. Belva is prior. Shirline is not inept. Shirline is prenuptial. Shirline is impassable. Shirline is unwoven. Shirline is prior. If Shirline is not impassable then Shirline is inept. If something is prenuptial and not undefeated then it is unwoven. Belva is not unwoven.", "logic": "\nInept(belva)\nPrenuptial(belva)\nImpassable(belva)\nnot Unwoven(belva)\nPrior(belva)\nnot Inept(shirline)\nPrenuptial(shirline)\nImpassable(shirline)\nUnwoven(shirline)\nPrior(shirline)\nnot Impassable(shirline) -> Inept(shirline)\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) and not Undefeated(x) -> Unwoven(x))\n\nnot Unwoven(belva)\n\ntherefore not Unwoven(belva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-22"} {"premises": "Noell is sarcoid. Noell is persian. Noell is sandaled. Noell is not coccygeal. Noell is argent. Manya is not sarcoid. Manya is persian. Manya is sandaled. Manya is coccygeal. Manya is argent. If Manya is not sandaled then Manya is sarcoid. If something is persian and not diametric then it is coccygeal. Manya is not argent.", "logic": "\nSarcoid(noell)\nPersian(noell)\nSandaled(noell)\nnot Coccygeal(noell)\nArgent(noell)\nnot Sarcoid(manya)\nPersian(manya)\nSandaled(manya)\nCoccygeal(manya)\nArgent(manya)\nnot Sandaled(manya) -> Sarcoid(manya)\nforall x (Persian(x) and not Diametric(x) -> Coccygeal(x))\n\nnot Argent(manya)\n\ntherefore Argent(manya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-22"} {"premises": "Rosemaria is literate. Rosemaria is lumpy. Rosemaria is pervasive. Rosemaria is not apical. Rosemaria is sinitic. Wilone is not literate. Wilone is lumpy. Wilone is pervasive. Wilone is apical. Wilone is sinitic. If Wilone is not pervasive then Wilone is literate. If something is lumpy and not aguish then it is apical. Wilone is not green.", "logic": "\nLiterate(rosemaria)\nLumpy(rosemaria)\nPervasive(rosemaria)\nnot Apical(rosemaria)\nSinitic(rosemaria)\nnot Literate(wilone)\nLumpy(wilone)\nPervasive(wilone)\nApical(wilone)\nSinitic(wilone)\nnot Pervasive(wilone) -> Literate(wilone)\nforall x (Lumpy(x) and not Aguish(x) -> Apical(x))\n\nnot Green(wilone)\n\nnot Green(wilone) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-22"} {"premises": "Zia is sphingine. Zia is flyblown. Zia is made. Zia is not pickled. Zia is elfin. Grace is not sphingine. Grace is flyblown. Grace is made. Grace is pickled. Grace is elfin. If Grace is not made then Grace is sphingine. If something is flyblown and not filled then it is pickled. Zia is green.", "logic": "\nSphingine(zia)\nFlyblown(zia)\nMade(zia)\nnot Pickled(zia)\nElfin(zia)\nnot Sphingine(grace)\nFlyblown(grace)\nMade(grace)\nPickled(grace)\nElfin(grace)\nnot Made(grace) -> Sphingine(grace)\nforall x (Flyblown(x) and not Filled(x) -> Pickled(x))\n\nGreen(zia)\n\nGreen(zia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-22"} {"premises": "The nelie overcrop the gizela. The nelie is moving. The nelie is appeasing. The nelie is not joyous. The nelie is gyroscopic. The nelie does not like the gizela. The nelie emaciate the gizela. The gizela overcrop the nelie. The gizela is equipotent. The gizela is moving. The gizela is appeasing. The gizela is joyous. The gizela is gyroscopic. The gizela retrace the nelie. The gizela emaciate the nelie. If the gizela emaciate the nelie then the nelie does not like the gizela. If something overcrop the gizela and it is not gyroscopic then it does not need the gizela. If something overcrop the gizela and it retrace the gizela then the gizela overcrop the nelie. If something retrace the nelie then the nelie is equipotent. If something is equipotent then it overcrop the nelie. If something is appeasing and it does not need the gizela then it is joyous. If the gizela is moving and the gizela overcrop the nelie then the gizela retrace the nelie. If something is joyous and it emaciate the gizela then the gizela retrace the nelie. The gizela emaciate the nelie.", "logic": "\nOvercrop(nelie, gizela)\nMoving(nelie)\nAppeasing(nelie)\nnot Joyous(nelie)\nGyroscopic(nelie)\nnot Retrace(nelie, gizela)\nEmaciate(nelie, gizela)\nOvercrop(gizela, nelie)\nEquipotent(gizela)\nMoving(gizela)\nAppeasing(gizela)\nJoyous(gizela)\nGyroscopic(gizela)\nRetrace(gizela, nelie)\nEmaciate(gizela, nelie)\nEmaciate(gizela, nelie) -> not Retrace(nelie, gizela)\nforall x (Overcrop(x, gizela) and not Gyroscopic(x) -> not Emaciate(x, gizela))\nforall x (Overcrop(x, gizela) and Retrace(x, gizela) -> Overcrop(gizela, nelie))\nforall x (Retrace(x, nelie) -> Equipotent(nelie))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) -> Overcrop(x, nelie))\nforall x (Appeasing(x) and not Emaciate(x, gizela) -> Joyous(x))\nMoving(gizela) and Overcrop(gizela, nelie) -> Retrace(gizela, nelie)\nforall x (Joyous(x) and Emaciate(x, gizela) -> Retrace(gizela, nelie))\n\nEmaciate(gizela, nelie)\n\ntherefore Emaciate(gizela, nelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The shannah answer the orelee. The shannah is unavenged. The shannah is unforested. The shannah is not twopenny. The shannah is boney. The shannah does not like the orelee. The shannah guard the orelee. The orelee answer the shannah. The orelee is south. The orelee is unavenged. The orelee is unforested. The orelee is twopenny. The orelee is boney. The orelee curtsy the shannah. The orelee guard the shannah. If the orelee guard the shannah then the shannah does not like the orelee. If something answer the orelee and it is not boney then it does not need the orelee. If something answer the orelee and it curtsy the orelee then the orelee answer the shannah. If something curtsy the shannah then the shannah is south. If something is south then it answer the shannah. If something is unforested and it does not need the orelee then it is twopenny. If the orelee is unavenged and the orelee answer the shannah then the orelee curtsy the shannah. If something is twopenny and it guard the orelee then the orelee curtsy the shannah. The orelee does not like the shannah.", "logic": "\nAnswer(shannah, orelee)\nUnavenged(shannah)\nUnforested(shannah)\nnot Twopenny(shannah)\nBoney(shannah)\nnot Curtsy(shannah, orelee)\nGuard(shannah, orelee)\nAnswer(orelee, shannah)\nSouth(orelee)\nUnavenged(orelee)\nUnforested(orelee)\nTwopenny(orelee)\nBoney(orelee)\nCurtsy(orelee, shannah)\nGuard(orelee, shannah)\nGuard(orelee, shannah) -> not Curtsy(shannah, orelee)\nforall x (Answer(x, orelee) and not Boney(x) -> not Guard(x, orelee))\nforall x (Answer(x, orelee) and Curtsy(x, orelee) -> Answer(orelee, shannah))\nforall x (Curtsy(x, shannah) -> South(shannah))\nforall x (South(x) -> Answer(x, shannah))\nforall x (Unforested(x) and not Guard(x, orelee) -> Twopenny(x))\nUnavenged(orelee) and Answer(orelee, shannah) -> Curtsy(orelee, shannah)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Guard(x, orelee) -> Curtsy(orelee, shannah))\n\nnot Curtsy(orelee, shannah)\n\ntherefore Curtsy(orelee, shannah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The moya precess the gwenette. The moya is cataclinal. The moya is ataxic. The moya is not unsoiled. The moya is unmanned. The moya does not like the gwenette. The moya insist the gwenette. The gwenette precess the moya. The gwenette is aromatic. The gwenette is cataclinal. The gwenette is ataxic. The gwenette is unsoiled. The gwenette is unmanned. The gwenette anoint the moya. The gwenette insist the moya. If the gwenette insist the moya then the moya does not like the gwenette. If something precess the gwenette and it is not unmanned then it does not need the gwenette. If something precess the gwenette and it anoint the gwenette then the gwenette precess the moya. If something anoint the moya then the moya is aromatic. If something is aromatic then it precess the moya. If something is ataxic and it does not need the gwenette then it is unsoiled. If the gwenette is cataclinal and the gwenette precess the moya then the gwenette anoint the moya. If something is unsoiled and it insist the gwenette then the gwenette anoint the moya. The moya is aromatic.", "logic": "\nPrecess(moya, gwenette)\nCataclinal(moya)\nAtaxic(moya)\nnot Unsoiled(moya)\nUnmanned(moya)\nnot Anoint(moya, gwenette)\nInsist(moya, gwenette)\nPrecess(gwenette, moya)\nAromatic(gwenette)\nCataclinal(gwenette)\nAtaxic(gwenette)\nUnsoiled(gwenette)\nUnmanned(gwenette)\nAnoint(gwenette, moya)\nInsist(gwenette, moya)\nInsist(gwenette, moya) -> not Anoint(moya, gwenette)\nforall x (Precess(x, gwenette) and not Unmanned(x) -> not Insist(x, gwenette))\nforall x (Precess(x, gwenette) and Anoint(x, gwenette) -> Precess(gwenette, moya))\nforall x (Anoint(x, moya) -> Aromatic(moya))\nforall x (Aromatic(x) -> Precess(x, moya))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) and not Insist(x, gwenette) -> Unsoiled(x))\nCataclinal(gwenette) and Precess(gwenette, moya) -> Anoint(gwenette, moya)\nforall x (Unsoiled(x) and Insist(x, gwenette) -> Anoint(gwenette, moya))\n\nAromatic(moya)\n\nAnoint(gwenette, moya) and forall x (Anoint(x, moya) -> Aromatic(moya)) -> therefore Aromatic(moya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The cloris mind the marybeth. The cloris is humane. The cloris is branched. The cloris is not casual. The cloris is nappy. The cloris does not like the marybeth. The cloris dope the marybeth. The marybeth mind the cloris. The marybeth is major. The marybeth is humane. The marybeth is branched. The marybeth is casual. The marybeth is nappy. The marybeth flick the cloris. The marybeth dope the cloris. If the marybeth dope the cloris then the cloris does not like the marybeth. If something mind the marybeth and it is not nappy then it does not need the marybeth. If something mind the marybeth and it flick the marybeth then the marybeth mind the cloris. If something flick the cloris then the cloris is major. If something is major then it mind the cloris. If something is branched and it does not need the marybeth then it is casual. If the marybeth is humane and the marybeth mind the cloris then the marybeth flick the cloris. If something is casual and it dope the marybeth then the marybeth flick the cloris. The cloris is not major.", "logic": "\nMind(cloris, marybeth)\nHumane(cloris)\nBranched(cloris)\nnot Casual(cloris)\nNappy(cloris)\nnot Flick(cloris, marybeth)\nDope(cloris, marybeth)\nMind(marybeth, cloris)\nMajor(marybeth)\nHumane(marybeth)\nBranched(marybeth)\nCasual(marybeth)\nNappy(marybeth)\nFlick(marybeth, cloris)\nDope(marybeth, cloris)\nDope(marybeth, cloris) -> not Flick(cloris, marybeth)\nforall x (Mind(x, marybeth) and not Nappy(x) -> not Dope(x, marybeth))\nforall x (Mind(x, marybeth) and Flick(x, marybeth) -> Mind(marybeth, cloris))\nforall x (Flick(x, cloris) -> Major(cloris))\nforall x (Major(x) -> Mind(x, cloris))\nforall x (Branched(x) and not Dope(x, marybeth) -> Casual(x))\nHumane(marybeth) and Mind(marybeth, cloris) -> Flick(marybeth, cloris)\nforall x (Casual(x) and Dope(x, marybeth) -> Flick(marybeth, cloris))\n\nnot Major(cloris)\n\nFlick(marybeth, cloris) and forall x (Flick(x, cloris) -> Major(cloris)) -> therefore Major(cloris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The stanislaw dissociate the dulcia. The stanislaw is nodular. The stanislaw is irish. The stanislaw is not honest. The stanislaw is inured. The stanislaw does not like the dulcia. The stanislaw jumpstart the dulcia. The dulcia dissociate the stanislaw. The dulcia is presumable. The dulcia is nodular. The dulcia is irish. The dulcia is honest. The dulcia is inured. The dulcia staunch the stanislaw. The dulcia jumpstart the stanislaw. If the dulcia jumpstart the stanislaw then the stanislaw does not like the dulcia. If something dissociate the dulcia and it is not inured then it does not need the dulcia. If something dissociate the dulcia and it staunch the dulcia then the dulcia dissociate the stanislaw. If something staunch the stanislaw then the stanislaw is presumable. If something is presumable then it dissociate the stanislaw. If something is irish and it does not need the dulcia then it is honest. If the dulcia is nodular and the dulcia dissociate the stanislaw then the dulcia staunch the stanislaw. If something is honest and it jumpstart the dulcia then the dulcia staunch the stanislaw. The stanislaw dissociate the stanislaw.", "logic": "\nDissociate(stanislaw, dulcia)\nNodular(stanislaw)\nIrish(stanislaw)\nnot Honest(stanislaw)\nInured(stanislaw)\nnot Staunch(stanislaw, dulcia)\nJumpstart(stanislaw, dulcia)\nDissociate(dulcia, stanislaw)\nPresumable(dulcia)\nNodular(dulcia)\nIrish(dulcia)\nHonest(dulcia)\nInured(dulcia)\nStaunch(dulcia, stanislaw)\nJumpstart(dulcia, stanislaw)\nJumpstart(dulcia, stanislaw) -> not Staunch(stanislaw, dulcia)\nforall x (Dissociate(x, dulcia) and not Inured(x) -> not Jumpstart(x, dulcia))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, dulcia) and Staunch(x, dulcia) -> Dissociate(dulcia, stanislaw))\nforall x (Staunch(x, stanislaw) -> Presumable(stanislaw))\nforall x (Presumable(x) -> Dissociate(x, stanislaw))\nforall x (Irish(x) and not Jumpstart(x, dulcia) -> Honest(x))\nNodular(dulcia) and Dissociate(dulcia, stanislaw) -> Staunch(dulcia, stanislaw)\nforall x (Honest(x) and Jumpstart(x, dulcia) -> Staunch(dulcia, stanislaw))\n\nDissociate(stanislaw, stanislaw)\n\nStaunch(dulcia, stanislaw) and forall x (Staunch(x, stanislaw) -> Presumable(stanislaw)) -> therefore Presumable(stanislaw) Presumable(stanislaw) and forall x (Presumable(x) -> Dissociate(x, stanislaw)) -> therefore Dissociate(stanislaw, stanislaw)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The sandy loose the tull. The sandy is caprine. The sandy is saliferous. The sandy is not argentine. The sandy is clinical. The sandy does not like the tull. The sandy hiccup the tull. The tull loose the sandy. The tull is exulting. The tull is caprine. The tull is saliferous. The tull is argentine. The tull is clinical. The tull concede the sandy. The tull hiccup the sandy. If the tull hiccup the sandy then the sandy does not like the tull. If something loose the tull and it is not clinical then it does not need the tull. If something loose the tull and it concede the tull then the tull loose the sandy. If something concede the sandy then the sandy is exulting. If something is exulting then it loose the sandy. If something is saliferous and it does not need the tull then it is argentine. If the tull is caprine and the tull loose the sandy then the tull concede the sandy. If something is argentine and it hiccup the tull then the tull concede the sandy. The sandy does not eat the sandy.", "logic": "\nLoose(sandy, tull)\nCaprine(sandy)\nSaliferous(sandy)\nnot Argentine(sandy)\nClinical(sandy)\nnot Concede(sandy, tull)\nHiccup(sandy, tull)\nLoose(tull, sandy)\nExulting(tull)\nCaprine(tull)\nSaliferous(tull)\nArgentine(tull)\nClinical(tull)\nConcede(tull, sandy)\nHiccup(tull, sandy)\nHiccup(tull, sandy) -> not Concede(sandy, tull)\nforall x (Loose(x, tull) and not Clinical(x) -> not Hiccup(x, tull))\nforall x (Loose(x, tull) and Concede(x, tull) -> Loose(tull, sandy))\nforall x (Concede(x, sandy) -> Exulting(sandy))\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Loose(x, sandy))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) and not Hiccup(x, tull) -> Argentine(x))\nCaprine(tull) and Loose(tull, sandy) -> Concede(tull, sandy)\nforall x (Argentine(x) and Hiccup(x, tull) -> Concede(tull, sandy))\n\nnot Loose(sandy, sandy)\n\nConcede(tull, sandy) and forall x (Concede(x, sandy) -> Exulting(sandy)) -> therefore Exulting(sandy) Exulting(sandy) and forall x (Exulting(x) -> Loose(x, sandy)) -> therefore Loose(sandy, sandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The caitlin hamstring the brice. The caitlin is weaned. The caitlin is unaltered. The caitlin is not accretive. The caitlin is noetic. The caitlin does not like the brice. The caitlin caddy the brice. The brice hamstring the caitlin. The brice is catholic. The brice is weaned. The brice is unaltered. The brice is accretive. The brice is noetic. The brice gasconade the caitlin. The brice caddy the caitlin. If the brice caddy the caitlin then the caitlin does not like the brice. If something hamstring the brice and it is not noetic then it does not need the brice. If something hamstring the brice and it gasconade the brice then the brice hamstring the caitlin. If something gasconade the caitlin then the caitlin is catholic. If something is catholic then it hamstring the caitlin. If something is unaltered and it does not need the brice then it is accretive. If the brice is weaned and the brice hamstring the caitlin then the brice gasconade the caitlin. If something is accretive and it caddy the brice then the brice gasconade the caitlin. The caitlin does not like the caitlin.", "logic": "\nHamstring(caitlin, brice)\nWeaned(caitlin)\nUnaltered(caitlin)\nnot Accretive(caitlin)\nNoetic(caitlin)\nnot Gasconade(caitlin, brice)\nCaddy(caitlin, brice)\nHamstring(brice, caitlin)\nCatholic(brice)\nWeaned(brice)\nUnaltered(brice)\nAccretive(brice)\nNoetic(brice)\nGasconade(brice, caitlin)\nCaddy(brice, caitlin)\nCaddy(brice, caitlin) -> not Gasconade(caitlin, brice)\nforall x (Hamstring(x, brice) and not Noetic(x) -> not Caddy(x, brice))\nforall x (Hamstring(x, brice) and Gasconade(x, brice) -> Hamstring(brice, caitlin))\nforall x (Gasconade(x, caitlin) -> Catholic(caitlin))\nforall x (Catholic(x) -> Hamstring(x, caitlin))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) and not Caddy(x, brice) -> Accretive(x))\nWeaned(brice) and Hamstring(brice, caitlin) -> Gasconade(brice, caitlin)\nforall x (Accretive(x) and Caddy(x, brice) -> Gasconade(brice, caitlin))\n\nnot Gasconade(caitlin, caitlin)\n\nnot Gasconade(caitlin, caitlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The fabrianne exfoliate the douglas. The fabrianne is astomatal. The fabrianne is taboo. The fabrianne is not pietistic. The fabrianne is levantine. The fabrianne does not like the douglas. The fabrianne push the douglas. The douglas exfoliate the fabrianne. The douglas is oldish. The douglas is astomatal. The douglas is taboo. The douglas is pietistic. The douglas is levantine. The douglas distance the fabrianne. The douglas push the fabrianne. If the douglas push the fabrianne then the fabrianne does not like the douglas. If something exfoliate the douglas and it is not levantine then it does not need the douglas. If something exfoliate the douglas and it distance the douglas then the douglas exfoliate the fabrianne. If something distance the fabrianne then the fabrianne is oldish. If something is oldish then it exfoliate the fabrianne. If something is taboo and it does not need the douglas then it is pietistic. If the douglas is astomatal and the douglas exfoliate the fabrianne then the douglas distance the fabrianne. If something is pietistic and it push the douglas then the douglas distance the fabrianne. The douglas exfoliate the douglas.", "logic": "\nExfoliate(fabrianne, douglas)\nAstomatal(fabrianne)\nTaboo(fabrianne)\nnot Pietistic(fabrianne)\nLevantine(fabrianne)\nnot Distance(fabrianne, douglas)\nPush(fabrianne, douglas)\nExfoliate(douglas, fabrianne)\nOldish(douglas)\nAstomatal(douglas)\nTaboo(douglas)\nPietistic(douglas)\nLevantine(douglas)\nDistance(douglas, fabrianne)\nPush(douglas, fabrianne)\nPush(douglas, fabrianne) -> not Distance(fabrianne, douglas)\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, douglas) and not Levantine(x) -> not Push(x, douglas))\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, douglas) and Distance(x, douglas) -> Exfoliate(douglas, fabrianne))\nforall x (Distance(x, fabrianne) -> Oldish(fabrianne))\nforall x (Oldish(x) -> Exfoliate(x, fabrianne))\nforall x (Taboo(x) and not Push(x, douglas) -> Pietistic(x))\nAstomatal(douglas) and Exfoliate(douglas, fabrianne) -> Distance(douglas, fabrianne)\nforall x (Pietistic(x) and Push(x, douglas) -> Distance(douglas, fabrianne))\n\nExfoliate(douglas, douglas)\n\nExfoliate(douglas, douglas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The pierre rumour the rheta. The pierre is tigerish. The pierre is cusped. The pierre is not ornate. The pierre is unexceeded. The pierre does not like the rheta. The pierre luge the rheta. The rheta rumour the pierre. The rheta is staid. The rheta is tigerish. The rheta is cusped. The rheta is ornate. The rheta is unexceeded. The rheta absolve the pierre. The rheta luge the pierre. If the rheta luge the pierre then the pierre does not like the rheta. If something rumour the rheta and it is not unexceeded then it does not need the rheta. If something rumour the rheta and it absolve the rheta then the rheta rumour the pierre. If something absolve the pierre then the pierre is staid. If something is staid then it rumour the pierre. If something is cusped and it does not need the rheta then it is ornate. If the rheta is tigerish and the rheta rumour the pierre then the rheta absolve the pierre. If something is ornate and it luge the rheta then the rheta absolve the pierre. The rheta does not need the rheta.", "logic": "\nRumour(pierre, rheta)\nTigerish(pierre)\nCusped(pierre)\nnot Ornate(pierre)\nUnexceeded(pierre)\nnot Absolve(pierre, rheta)\nLuge(pierre, rheta)\nRumour(rheta, pierre)\nStaid(rheta)\nTigerish(rheta)\nCusped(rheta)\nOrnate(rheta)\nUnexceeded(rheta)\nAbsolve(rheta, pierre)\nLuge(rheta, pierre)\nLuge(rheta, pierre) -> not Absolve(pierre, rheta)\nforall x (Rumour(x, rheta) and not Unexceeded(x) -> not Luge(x, rheta))\nforall x (Rumour(x, rheta) and Absolve(x, rheta) -> Rumour(rheta, pierre))\nforall x (Absolve(x, pierre) -> Staid(pierre))\nforall x (Staid(x) -> Rumour(x, pierre))\nforall x (Cusped(x) and not Luge(x, rheta) -> Ornate(x))\nTigerish(rheta) and Rumour(rheta, pierre) -> Absolve(rheta, pierre)\nforall x (Ornate(x) and Luge(x, rheta) -> Absolve(rheta, pierre))\n\nnot Luge(rheta, rheta)\n\nnot Luge(rheta, rheta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "The natasha alienate the blanch. The natasha is bentonitic. The natasha is comical. The natasha is not general. The natasha is diclinous. The natasha does not like the blanch. The natasha infatuate the blanch. The blanch alienate the natasha. The blanch is inchoate. The blanch is bentonitic. The blanch is comical. The blanch is general. The blanch is diclinous. The blanch unchurch the natasha. The blanch infatuate the natasha. If the blanch infatuate the natasha then the natasha does not like the blanch. If something alienate the blanch and it is not diclinous then it does not need the blanch. If something alienate the blanch and it unchurch the blanch then the blanch alienate the natasha. If something unchurch the natasha then the natasha is inchoate. If something is inchoate then it alienate the natasha. If something is comical and it does not need the blanch then it is general. If the blanch is bentonitic and the blanch alienate the natasha then the blanch unchurch the natasha. If something is general and it infatuate the blanch then the blanch unchurch the natasha. The natasha infatuate the natasha.", "logic": "\nAlienate(natasha, blanch)\nBentonitic(natasha)\nComical(natasha)\nnot General(natasha)\nDiclinous(natasha)\nnot Unchurch(natasha, blanch)\nInfatuate(natasha, blanch)\nAlienate(blanch, natasha)\nInchoate(blanch)\nBentonitic(blanch)\nComical(blanch)\nGeneral(blanch)\nDiclinous(blanch)\nUnchurch(blanch, natasha)\nInfatuate(blanch, natasha)\nInfatuate(blanch, natasha) -> not Unchurch(natasha, blanch)\nforall x (Alienate(x, blanch) and not Diclinous(x) -> not Infatuate(x, blanch))\nforall x (Alienate(x, blanch) and Unchurch(x, blanch) -> Alienate(blanch, natasha))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, natasha) -> Inchoate(natasha))\nforall x (Inchoate(x) -> Alienate(x, natasha))\nforall x (Comical(x) and not Infatuate(x, blanch) -> General(x))\nBentonitic(blanch) and Alienate(blanch, natasha) -> Unchurch(blanch, natasha)\nforall x (General(x) and Infatuate(x, blanch) -> Unchurch(blanch, natasha))\n\nInfatuate(natasha, natasha)\n\nInfatuate(natasha, natasha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-309"} {"premises": "Samaria is alated. Clive is curtal. Ariela is bankrupt. If Ariela is not bankrupt then Ariela is glued. If Samaria is downlike then Samaria is bankrupt. All downlike, glued things are futureless. Samaria is alated.", "logic": "\nAlated(samaria)\nCurtal(clive)\nBankrupt(ariela)\nnot Bankrupt(ariela) -> Glued(ariela)\nDownlike(samaria) -> Bankrupt(samaria)\nforall x (Downlike(x) and Glued(x) -> Futureless(x))\n\nAlated(samaria)\n\ntherefore Alated(samaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1618"} {"premises": "Scot is baritone. Storey is activating. Andrea is private. If Andrea is not private then Andrea is auspicious. If Scot is chelonian then Scot is private. All chelonian, auspicious things are fretted. Scot is not baritone.", "logic": "\nBaritone(scot)\nActivating(storey)\nPrivate(andrea)\nnot Private(andrea) -> Auspicious(andrea)\nChelonian(scot) -> Private(scot)\nforall x (Chelonian(x) and Auspicious(x) -> Fretted(x))\n\nnot Baritone(scot)\n\ntherefore Baritone(scot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1618"} {"premises": "Anica is ferric. Garey is broadleaf. Kylie is exilic. If Kylie is not exilic then Kylie is decadent. If Anica is shifting then Anica is exilic. All shifting, decadent things are albitic. Anica is not albitic.", "logic": "\nFerric(anica)\nBroadleaf(garey)\nExilic(kylie)\nnot Exilic(kylie) -> Decadent(kylie)\nShifting(anica) -> Exilic(anica)\nforall x (Shifting(x) and Decadent(x) -> Albitic(x))\n\nnot Albitic(anica)\n\nforall x (Shifting(x) and Decadent(x) -> Albitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1618"} {"premises": "Frederick is avowed. Tann is wound. Robbi is fused. If Robbi is not fused then Robbi is writhing. If Frederick is sceptered then Frederick is fused. All sceptered, writhing things are parthian. Tann is avowed.", "logic": "\nAvowed(frederick)\nWound(tann)\nFused(robbi)\nnot Fused(robbi) -> Writhing(robbi)\nSceptered(frederick) -> Fused(frederick)\nforall x (Sceptered(x) and Writhing(x) -> Parthian(x))\n\nAvowed(tann)\n\nAvowed(tann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1618"} {"premises": "Amata is infinite. Amata is clayey. Salmon is nonstop. Salmon is picaresque. Salmon is infinite. Salmon is anestric. Ruthanne is anestric. Eudora is picaresque. Eudora is woodsy. Eudora is clayey. All clayey things are woodsy. If something is aliquot then it is nonstop. All infinite, anestric things are woodsy. If something is infinite then it is nonstop. All picaresque, anestric things are woodsy. If something is infinite and picaresque then it is anestric. If something is nonstop then it is picaresque. Red, infinite things are woodsy. Salmon is infinite.", "logic": "\nInfinite(amata)\nClayey(amata)\nNonstop(salmon)\nPicaresque(salmon)\nInfinite(salmon)\nAnestric(salmon)\nAnestric(ruthanne)\nPicaresque(eudora)\nWoodsy(eudora)\nClayey(eudora)\nforall x (Clayey(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Nonstop(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) and Anestric(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) -> Nonstop(x))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) and Anestric(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Infinite(x) and Picaresque(x) -> Anestric(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) -> Picaresque(x))\nforall x (Anestric(x) and Infinite(x) -> Woodsy(x))\n\nInfinite(salmon)\n\ntherefore Infinite(salmon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Maurie is unhurried. Maurie is excretory. Yance is fraudulent. Yance is bedrid. Yance is unhurried. Yance is overarm. Philly is overarm. Emelda is bedrid. Emelda is abortive. Emelda is excretory. All excretory things are abortive. If something is cormous then it is fraudulent. All unhurried, overarm things are abortive. If something is unhurried then it is fraudulent. All bedrid, overarm things are abortive. If something is unhurried and bedrid then it is overarm. If something is fraudulent then it is bedrid. Red, unhurried things are abortive. Maurie is not excretory.", "logic": "\nUnhurried(maurie)\nExcretory(maurie)\nFraudulent(yance)\nBedrid(yance)\nUnhurried(yance)\nOverarm(yance)\nOverarm(philly)\nBedrid(emelda)\nAbortive(emelda)\nExcretory(emelda)\nforall x (Excretory(x) -> Abortive(x))\nforall x (Cormous(x) -> Fraudulent(x))\nforall x (Unhurried(x) and Overarm(x) -> Abortive(x))\nforall x (Unhurried(x) -> Fraudulent(x))\nforall x (Bedrid(x) and Overarm(x) -> Abortive(x))\nforall x (Unhurried(x) and Bedrid(x) -> Overarm(x))\nforall x (Fraudulent(x) -> Bedrid(x))\nforall x (Overarm(x) and Unhurried(x) -> Abortive(x))\n\nnot Excretory(maurie)\n\ntherefore Excretory(maurie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Kai is semestral. Kai is affordable. Aridatha is puffy. Aridatha is banausic. Aridatha is semestral. Aridatha is obscene. Janet is obscene. Aili is banausic. Aili is fibrillose. Aili is affordable. All affordable things are fibrillose. If something is petrous then it is puffy. All semestral, obscene things are fibrillose. If something is semestral then it is puffy. All banausic, obscene things are fibrillose. If something is semestral and banausic then it is obscene. If something is puffy then it is banausic. Red, semestral things are fibrillose. Kai is puffy.", "logic": "\nSemestral(kai)\nAffordable(kai)\nPuffy(aridatha)\nBanausic(aridatha)\nSemestral(aridatha)\nObscene(aridatha)\nObscene(janet)\nBanausic(aili)\nFibrillose(aili)\nAffordable(aili)\nforall x (Affordable(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Petrous(x) -> Puffy(x))\nforall x (Semestral(x) and Obscene(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Semestral(x) -> Puffy(x))\nforall x (Banausic(x) and Obscene(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Semestral(x) and Banausic(x) -> Obscene(x))\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Banausic(x))\nforall x (Obscene(x) and Semestral(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\n\nPuffy(kai)\n\nSemestral(kai) and forall x (Semestral(x) -> Puffy(x)) -> therefore Puffy(kai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Hayley is immobile. Hayley is bulbar. Frannie is aecial. Frannie is loud. Frannie is immobile. Frannie is appendaged. Tonnie is appendaged. Wilson is loud. Wilson is scurrilous. Wilson is bulbar. All bulbar things are scurrilous. If something is saturated then it is aecial. All immobile, appendaged things are scurrilous. If something is immobile then it is aecial. All loud, appendaged things are scurrilous. If something is immobile and loud then it is appendaged. If something is aecial then it is loud. Red, immobile things are scurrilous. Hayley is not scurrilous.", "logic": "\nImmobile(hayley)\nBulbar(hayley)\nAecial(frannie)\nLoud(frannie)\nImmobile(frannie)\nAppendaged(frannie)\nAppendaged(tonnie)\nLoud(wilson)\nScurrilous(wilson)\nBulbar(wilson)\nforall x (Bulbar(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Saturated(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) and Appendaged(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Loud(x) and Appendaged(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) and Loud(x) -> Appendaged(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Loud(x))\nforall x (Appendaged(x) and Immobile(x) -> Scurrilous(x))\n\nnot Scurrilous(hayley)\n\nBulbar(hayley) and forall x (Bulbar(x) -> Scurrilous(x)) -> therefore Scurrilous(hayley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Karrie is gaping. Karrie is comburent. Cameron is sixtieth. Cameron is ossiculate. Cameron is gaping. Cameron is sciolistic. Spencer is sciolistic. Tamiko is ossiculate. Tamiko is aculeate. Tamiko is comburent. All comburent things are aculeate. If something is screaky then it is sixtieth. All gaping, sciolistic things are aculeate. If something is gaping then it is sixtieth. All ossiculate, sciolistic things are aculeate. If something is gaping and ossiculate then it is sciolistic. If something is sixtieth then it is ossiculate. Red, gaping things are aculeate. Karrie is ossiculate.", "logic": "\nGaping(karrie)\nComburent(karrie)\nSixtieth(cameron)\nOssiculate(cameron)\nGaping(cameron)\nSciolistic(cameron)\nSciolistic(spencer)\nOssiculate(tamiko)\nAculeate(tamiko)\nComburent(tamiko)\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> Aculeate(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Sixtieth(x))\nforall x (Gaping(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> Aculeate(x))\nforall x (Gaping(x) -> Sixtieth(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> Aculeate(x))\nforall x (Gaping(x) and Ossiculate(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\nforall x (Sixtieth(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) and Gaping(x) -> Aculeate(x))\n\nOssiculate(karrie)\n\nGaping(karrie) and forall x (Gaping(x) -> Sixtieth(x)) -> therefore Sixtieth(karrie) Sixtieth(karrie) and forall x (Sixtieth(x) -> Ossiculate(x)) -> therefore Ossiculate(karrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Gracie is nativistic. Gracie is sleek. Kent is coiled. Kent is astral. Kent is nativistic. Kent is bareback. Aubrie is bareback. Linn is astral. Linn is sympatric. Linn is sleek. All sleek things are sympatric. If something is abatic then it is coiled. All nativistic, bareback things are sympatric. If something is nativistic then it is coiled. All astral, bareback things are sympatric. If something is nativistic and astral then it is bareback. If something is coiled then it is astral. Red, nativistic things are sympatric. Gracie is not astral.", "logic": "\nNativistic(gracie)\nSleek(gracie)\nCoiled(kent)\nAstral(kent)\nNativistic(kent)\nBareback(kent)\nBareback(aubrie)\nAstral(linn)\nSympatric(linn)\nSleek(linn)\nforall x (Sleek(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Abatic(x) -> Coiled(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Bareback(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) -> Coiled(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Bareback(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) and Astral(x) -> Bareback(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Nativistic(x) -> Sympatric(x))\n\nnot Astral(gracie)\n\nNativistic(gracie) and forall x (Nativistic(x) -> Coiled(x)) -> therefore Coiled(gracie) Coiled(gracie) and forall x (Coiled(x) -> Astral(x)) -> therefore Astral(gracie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Ivor is astral. Ivor is queenlike. Alyson is subsidized. Alyson is opulent. Alyson is astral. Alyson is ducal. Eve is ducal. Tate is opulent. Tate is oppositive. Tate is queenlike. All queenlike things are oppositive. If something is awing then it is subsidized. All astral, ducal things are oppositive. If something is astral then it is subsidized. All opulent, ducal things are oppositive. If something is astral and opulent then it is ducal. If something is subsidized then it is opulent. Red, astral things are oppositive. Ivor is ducal.", "logic": "\nAstral(ivor)\nQueenlike(ivor)\nSubsidized(alyson)\nOpulent(alyson)\nAstral(alyson)\nDucal(alyson)\nDucal(eve)\nOpulent(tate)\nOppositive(tate)\nQueenlike(tate)\nforall x (Queenlike(x) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Awing(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Ducal(x) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Opulent(x) and Ducal(x) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Opulent(x) -> Ducal(x))\nforall x (Subsidized(x) -> Opulent(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) and Astral(x) -> Oppositive(x))\n\nDucal(ivor)\n\nAstral(ivor) and forall x (Astral(x) -> Subsidized(x)) -> therefore Subsidized(ivor) Subsidized(ivor) and forall x (Subsidized(x) -> Opulent(x)) -> therefore Opulent(ivor) Astral(ivor) and Opulent(ivor) and forall x (Astral(x) and Opulent(x) -> Ducal(x)) -> therefore Ducal(ivor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Federica is buttonlike. Federica is emphasised. Heinz is korean. Heinz is artesian. Heinz is buttonlike. Heinz is atomic. Melinda is atomic. Shay is artesian. Shay is hopeful. Shay is emphasised. All emphasised things are hopeful. If something is misogynous then it is korean. All buttonlike, atomic things are hopeful. If something is buttonlike then it is korean. All artesian, atomic things are hopeful. If something is buttonlike and artesian then it is atomic. If something is korean then it is artesian. Red, buttonlike things are hopeful. Federica is not atomic.", "logic": "\nButtonlike(federica)\nEmphasised(federica)\nKorean(heinz)\nArtesian(heinz)\nButtonlike(heinz)\nAtomic(heinz)\nAtomic(melinda)\nArtesian(shay)\nHopeful(shay)\nEmphasised(shay)\nforall x (Emphasised(x) -> Hopeful(x))\nforall x (Misogynous(x) -> Korean(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) and Atomic(x) -> Hopeful(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Korean(x))\nforall x (Artesian(x) and Atomic(x) -> Hopeful(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) and Artesian(x) -> Atomic(x))\nforall x (Korean(x) -> Artesian(x))\nforall x (Atomic(x) and Buttonlike(x) -> Hopeful(x))\n\nnot Atomic(federica)\n\nButtonlike(federica) and forall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Korean(x)) -> therefore Korean(federica) Korean(federica) and forall x (Korean(x) -> Artesian(x)) -> therefore Artesian(federica) Buttonlike(federica) and Artesian(federica) and forall x (Buttonlike(x) and Artesian(x) -> Atomic(x)) -> therefore Atomic(federica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Francisca is incan. Francisca is ruled. Agustin is westbound. Agustin is insatiate. Agustin is incan. Agustin is negligent. Ximenez is negligent. Arlana is insatiate. Arlana is allogeneic. Arlana is ruled. All ruled things are allogeneic. If something is squelched then it is westbound. All incan, negligent things are allogeneic. If something is incan then it is westbound. All insatiate, negligent things are allogeneic. If something is incan and insatiate then it is negligent. If something is westbound then it is insatiate. Red, incan things are allogeneic. Ximenez is not westbound.", "logic": "\nIncan(francisca)\nRuled(francisca)\nWestbound(agustin)\nInsatiate(agustin)\nIncan(agustin)\nNegligent(agustin)\nNegligent(ximenez)\nInsatiate(arlana)\nAllogeneic(arlana)\nRuled(arlana)\nforall x (Ruled(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Squelched(x) -> Westbound(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) and Negligent(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) -> Westbound(x))\nforall x (Insatiate(x) and Negligent(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Incan(x) and Insatiate(x) -> Negligent(x))\nforall x (Westbound(x) -> Insatiate(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) and Incan(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\n\nnot Westbound(ximenez)\n\nforall x (Squelched(x) -> Westbound(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Reine is flaring. Reine is acquainted. Fyodor is unrecorded. Fyodor is indurate. Fyodor is flaring. Fyodor is donnean. Derk is donnean. Bobbette is indurate. Bobbette is workable. Bobbette is acquainted. All acquainted things are workable. If something is zairean then it is unrecorded. All flaring, donnean things are workable. If something is flaring then it is unrecorded. All indurate, donnean things are workable. If something is flaring and indurate then it is donnean. If something is unrecorded then it is indurate. Red, flaring things are workable. Bobbette is donnean.", "logic": "\nFlaring(reine)\nAcquainted(reine)\nUnrecorded(fyodor)\nIndurate(fyodor)\nFlaring(fyodor)\nDonnean(fyodor)\nDonnean(derk)\nIndurate(bobbette)\nWorkable(bobbette)\nAcquainted(bobbette)\nforall x (Acquainted(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Zairean(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Donnean(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Donnean(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Indurate(x) -> Donnean(x))\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Donnean(x) and Flaring(x) -> Workable(x))\n\nDonnean(bobbette)\n\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Indurate(x) -> Donnean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Ailyn is osseous. Ailyn is creaky. Renato is barbellate. Renato is mouthlike. Renato is osseous. Renato is obnoxious. Gavra is obnoxious. Eadie is mouthlike. Eadie is phantom. Eadie is creaky. All creaky things are phantom. If something is squinting then it is barbellate. All osseous, obnoxious things are phantom. If something is osseous then it is barbellate. All mouthlike, obnoxious things are phantom. If something is osseous and mouthlike then it is obnoxious. If something is barbellate then it is mouthlike. Red, osseous things are phantom. Gavra is not phantom.", "logic": "\nOsseous(ailyn)\nCreaky(ailyn)\nBarbellate(renato)\nMouthlike(renato)\nOsseous(renato)\nObnoxious(renato)\nObnoxious(gavra)\nMouthlike(eadie)\nPhantom(eadie)\nCreaky(eadie)\nforall x (Creaky(x) -> Phantom(x))\nforall x (Squinting(x) -> Barbellate(x))\nforall x (Osseous(x) and Obnoxious(x) -> Phantom(x))\nforall x (Osseous(x) -> Barbellate(x))\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) and Obnoxious(x) -> Phantom(x))\nforall x (Osseous(x) and Mouthlike(x) -> Obnoxious(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Mouthlike(x))\nforall x (Obnoxious(x) and Osseous(x) -> Phantom(x))\n\nnot Phantom(gavra)\n\nforall x (Mouthlike(x) and Obnoxious(x) -> Phantom(x)) <- forall x (Barbellate(x) -> Mouthlike(x)) <- forall x (Squinting(x) -> Barbellate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Layney is stimulant. Layney is symbiotic. Kathe is uncommon. Kathe is unkindled. Kathe is stimulant. Kathe is thrilling. Ignace is thrilling. Lemar is unkindled. Lemar is axillary. Lemar is symbiotic. All symbiotic things are axillary. If something is pastelike then it is uncommon. All stimulant, thrilling things are axillary. If something is stimulant then it is uncommon. All unkindled, thrilling things are axillary. If something is stimulant and unkindled then it is thrilling. If something is uncommon then it is unkindled. Red, stimulant things are axillary. Ignace is unkindled.", "logic": "\nStimulant(layney)\nSymbiotic(layney)\nUncommon(kathe)\nUnkindled(kathe)\nStimulant(kathe)\nThrilling(kathe)\nThrilling(ignace)\nUnkindled(lemar)\nAxillary(lemar)\nSymbiotic(lemar)\nforall x (Symbiotic(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Pastelike(x) -> Uncommon(x))\nforall x (Stimulant(x) and Thrilling(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> Uncommon(x))\nforall x (Unkindled(x) and Thrilling(x) -> Axillary(x))\nforall x (Stimulant(x) and Unkindled(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) -> Unkindled(x))\nforall x (Thrilling(x) and Stimulant(x) -> Axillary(x))\n\nUnkindled(ignace)\n\nforall x (Uncommon(x) -> Unkindled(x)) <- forall x (Pastelike(x) -> Uncommon(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Ram is lettered. Ram is innocent. Norris is global. Norris is xlii. Norris is lettered. Norris is beechen. Tomkin is beechen. Giacinta is xlii. Giacinta is enchained. Giacinta is innocent. All innocent things are enchained. If something is mayoral then it is global. All lettered, beechen things are enchained. If something is lettered then it is global. All xlii, beechen things are enchained. If something is lettered and xlii then it is beechen. If something is global then it is xlii. Red, lettered things are enchained. Ram is not mayoral.", "logic": "\nLettered(ram)\nInnocent(ram)\nGlobal(norris)\nXlii(norris)\nLettered(norris)\nBeechen(norris)\nBeechen(tomkin)\nXlii(giacinta)\nEnchained(giacinta)\nInnocent(giacinta)\nforall x (Innocent(x) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Mayoral(x) -> Global(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Beechen(x) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Global(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) and Beechen(x) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Xlii(x) -> Beechen(x))\nforall x (Global(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Beechen(x) and Lettered(x) -> Enchained(x))\n\nnot Mayoral(ram)\n\nnot Mayoral(ram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Lefty is west. Lefty is wailful. Shara is puissant. Shara is scalar. Shara is west. Shara is stomatal. Kamilah is stomatal. Harriott is scalar. Harriott is composite. Harriott is wailful. All wailful things are composite. If something is burundi then it is puissant. All west, stomatal things are composite. If something is west then it is puissant. All scalar, stomatal things are composite. If something is west and scalar then it is stomatal. If something is puissant then it is scalar. Red, west things are composite. Harriott is west.", "logic": "\nWest(lefty)\nWailful(lefty)\nPuissant(shara)\nScalar(shara)\nWest(shara)\nStomatal(shara)\nStomatal(kamilah)\nScalar(harriott)\nComposite(harriott)\nWailful(harriott)\nforall x (Wailful(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) -> Puissant(x))\nforall x (West(x) and Stomatal(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (West(x) -> Puissant(x))\nforall x (Scalar(x) and Stomatal(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (West(x) and Scalar(x) -> Stomatal(x))\nforall x (Puissant(x) -> Scalar(x))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) and West(x) -> Composite(x))\n\nWest(harriott)\n\nWest(harriott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Viki is vaned. Viki is asserted. Rochelle is cheeky. Rochelle is nicaean. Rochelle is vaned. Rochelle is dismaying. Pippa is dismaying. Kendre is nicaean. Kendre is adjustive. Kendre is asserted. All asserted things are adjustive. If something is acerbic then it is cheeky. All vaned, dismaying things are adjustive. If something is vaned then it is cheeky. All nicaean, dismaying things are adjustive. If something is vaned and nicaean then it is dismaying. If something is cheeky then it is nicaean. Red, vaned things are adjustive. Rochelle is not asserted.", "logic": "\nVaned(viki)\nAsserted(viki)\nCheeky(rochelle)\nNicaean(rochelle)\nVaned(rochelle)\nDismaying(rochelle)\nDismaying(pippa)\nNicaean(kendre)\nAdjustive(kendre)\nAsserted(kendre)\nforall x (Asserted(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) and Dismaying(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) and Dismaying(x) -> Adjustive(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) and Nicaean(x) -> Dismaying(x))\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> Nicaean(x))\nforall x (Dismaying(x) and Vaned(x) -> Adjustive(x))\n\nnot Asserted(rochelle)\n\nnot Asserted(rochelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Moss is unbridled. Moss is prosthetic. Lacy is gyroscopic. Lacy is familial. Lacy is unbridled. Lacy is banned. Shaun is banned. Brandais is familial. Brandais is biliary. Brandais is prosthetic. All prosthetic things are biliary. If something is phyllodial then it is gyroscopic. All unbridled, banned things are biliary. If something is unbridled then it is gyroscopic. All familial, banned things are biliary. If something is unbridled and familial then it is banned. If something is gyroscopic then it is familial. Red, unbridled things are biliary. Lacy is phyllodial.", "logic": "\nUnbridled(moss)\nProsthetic(moss)\nGyroscopic(lacy)\nFamilial(lacy)\nUnbridled(lacy)\nBanned(lacy)\nBanned(shaun)\nFamilial(brandais)\nBiliary(brandais)\nProsthetic(brandais)\nforall x (Prosthetic(x) -> Biliary(x))\nforall x (Phyllodial(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) and Banned(x) -> Biliary(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Familial(x) and Banned(x) -> Biliary(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) and Familial(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) -> Familial(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) and Unbridled(x) -> Biliary(x))\n\nPhyllodial(lacy)\n\nPhyllodial(lacy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Allin is bacterioid. Ruperto is pitted. Weston is retinal. If something is permeant then it is not pitted. All bacterioid things are beery. If something is bacterioid then it is beery. Smart, retinal things are permeant. If something is pitted then it is bacterioid. All pitted, glutinous things are bacterioid. All beery things are tomboyish. Smart, permeant things are retinal. Ruperto is pitted.", "logic": "\nBacterioid(allin)\nPitted(ruperto)\nRetinal(weston)\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> not Pitted(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Beery(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and Retinal(x) -> Permeant(x))\nforall x (Pitted(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Pitted(x) and Glutinous(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Beery(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and Permeant(x) -> Retinal(x))\n\nPitted(ruperto)\n\ntherefore Pitted(ruperto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Bertine is armless. Chandler is partisan. Millicent is transpolar. If something is misbegot then it is not partisan. All armless things are daedal. If something is armless then it is daedal. Smart, transpolar things are misbegot. If something is partisan then it is armless. All partisan, woollen things are armless. All daedal things are catenulate. Smart, misbegot things are transpolar. Chandler is not partisan.", "logic": "\nArmless(bertine)\nPartisan(chandler)\nTranspolar(millicent)\nforall x (Misbegot(x) -> not Partisan(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) and Transpolar(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Partisan(x) -> Armless(x))\nforall x (Partisan(x) and Woollen(x) -> Armless(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Catenulate(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) and Misbegot(x) -> Transpolar(x))\n\nnot Partisan(chandler)\n\ntherefore Partisan(chandler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Monique is continuant. Ema is balzacian. Ray is tempering. If something is huge then it is not balzacian. All continuant things are intimal. If something is continuant then it is intimal. Smart, tempering things are huge. If something is balzacian then it is continuant. All balzacian, scrimpy things are continuant. All intimal things are fortissimo. Smart, huge things are tempering. Ema is continuant.", "logic": "\nContinuant(monique)\nBalzacian(ema)\nTempering(ray)\nforall x (Huge(x) -> not Balzacian(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Intimal(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Intimal(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) and Tempering(x) -> Huge(x))\nforall x (Balzacian(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Balzacian(x) and Scrimpy(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Intimal(x) -> Fortissimo(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) and Huge(x) -> Tempering(x))\n\nContinuant(ema)\n\nBalzacian(ema) and forall x (Balzacian(x) -> Continuant(x)) -> therefore Continuant(ema)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Zandra is unkept. Rana is pedal. Rebeca is nonlegal. If something is addictive then it is not pedal. All unkept things are unstinting. If something is unkept then it is unstinting. Smart, nonlegal things are addictive. If something is pedal then it is unkept. All pedal, coagulable things are unkept. All unstinting things are calendric. Smart, addictive things are nonlegal. Zandra is not unstinting.", "logic": "\nUnkept(zandra)\nPedal(rana)\nNonlegal(rebeca)\nforall x (Addictive(x) -> not Pedal(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) and Nonlegal(x) -> Addictive(x))\nforall x (Pedal(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Pedal(x) and Coagulable(x) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Calendric(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) and Addictive(x) -> Nonlegal(x))\n\nnot Unstinting(zandra)\n\nUnkept(zandra) and forall x (Unkept(x) -> Unstinting(x)) -> therefore Unstinting(zandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Novelia is divided. Philomena is carpeted. Sissy is navicular. If something is giving then it is not carpeted. All divided things are fluky. If something is divided then it is fluky. Smart, navicular things are giving. If something is carpeted then it is divided. All carpeted, specular things are divided. All fluky things are unsure. Smart, giving things are navicular. Philomena is fluky.", "logic": "\nDivided(novelia)\nCarpeted(philomena)\nNavicular(sissy)\nforall x (Giving(x) -> not Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Fluky(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Fluky(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Navicular(x) -> Giving(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) and Specular(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Unsure(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Giving(x) -> Navicular(x))\n\nFluky(philomena)\n\nCarpeted(philomena) and forall x (Carpeted(x) -> Divided(x)) -> therefore Divided(philomena) Divided(philomena) and forall x (Divided(x) -> Fluky(x)) -> therefore Fluky(philomena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Jens is fugal. Sigfrid is mercerised. Lavena is overnight. If something is opposed then it is not mercerised. All fugal things are smooth. If something is fugal then it is smooth. Smart, overnight things are opposed. If something is mercerised then it is fugal. All mercerised, concerned things are fugal. All smooth things are owing. Smart, opposed things are overnight. Jens is not owing.", "logic": "\nFugal(jens)\nMercerised(sigfrid)\nOvernight(lavena)\nforall x (Opposed(x) -> not Mercerised(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) -> Smooth(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) -> Smooth(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) and Overnight(x) -> Opposed(x))\nforall x (Mercerised(x) -> Fugal(x))\nforall x (Mercerised(x) and Concerned(x) -> Fugal(x))\nforall x (Smooth(x) -> Owing(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) and Opposed(x) -> Overnight(x))\n\nnot Owing(jens)\n\nFugal(jens) and forall x (Fugal(x) -> Smooth(x)) -> therefore Smooth(jens) Smooth(jens) and forall x (Smooth(x) -> Owing(x)) -> therefore Owing(jens)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Valry is monotone. Cletus is tertian. Kalindi is assuring. If something is unfrozen then it is not tertian. All monotone things are ammoniated. If something is monotone then it is ammoniated. Smart, assuring things are unfrozen. If something is tertian then it is monotone. All tertian, amort things are monotone. All ammoniated things are sottish. Smart, unfrozen things are assuring. Cletus is sottish.", "logic": "\nMonotone(valry)\nTertian(cletus)\nAssuring(kalindi)\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> not Tertian(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) -> Ammoniated(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) -> Ammoniated(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) and Assuring(x) -> Unfrozen(x))\nforall x (Tertian(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Tertian(x) and Amort(x) -> Monotone(x))\nforall x (Ammoniated(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) and Unfrozen(x) -> Assuring(x))\n\nSottish(cletus)\n\nTertian(cletus) and forall x (Tertian(x) -> Monotone(x)) -> therefore Monotone(cletus) Monotone(cletus) and forall x (Monotone(x) -> Ammoniated(x)) -> therefore Ammoniated(cletus) Ammoniated(cletus) and forall x (Ammoniated(x) -> Sottish(x)) -> therefore Sottish(cletus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Dolora is unassigned. Eveleen is contested. Katrina is umpteen. If something is birken then it is not contested. All unassigned things are thumping. If something is unassigned then it is thumping. Smart, umpteen things are birken. If something is contested then it is unassigned. All contested, fatless things are unassigned. All thumping things are stoical. Smart, birken things are umpteen. Eveleen is not stoical.", "logic": "\nUnassigned(dolora)\nContested(eveleen)\nUmpteen(katrina)\nforall x (Birken(x) -> not Contested(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> Thumping(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> Thumping(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) and Umpteen(x) -> Birken(x))\nforall x (Contested(x) -> Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Contested(x) and Fatless(x) -> Unassigned(x))\nforall x (Thumping(x) -> Stoical(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) and Birken(x) -> Umpteen(x))\n\nnot Stoical(eveleen)\n\nContested(eveleen) and forall x (Contested(x) -> Unassigned(x)) -> therefore Unassigned(eveleen) Unassigned(eveleen) and forall x (Unassigned(x) -> Thumping(x)) -> therefore Thumping(eveleen) Thumping(eveleen) and forall x (Thumping(x) -> Stoical(x)) -> therefore Stoical(eveleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Conchita is settled. Herrick is abrupt. Shelden is zonal. If something is baked then it is not abrupt. All settled things are dewy. If something is settled then it is dewy. Smart, zonal things are baked. If something is abrupt then it is settled. All abrupt, circular things are settled. All dewy things are scottish. Smart, baked things are zonal. Shelden is not dewy.", "logic": "\nSettled(conchita)\nAbrupt(herrick)\nZonal(shelden)\nforall x (Baked(x) -> not Abrupt(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Dewy(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Dewy(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) and Zonal(x) -> Baked(x))\nforall x (Abrupt(x) -> Settled(x))\nforall x (Abrupt(x) and Circular(x) -> Settled(x))\nforall x (Dewy(x) -> Scottish(x))\nforall x (Settled(x) and Baked(x) -> Zonal(x))\n\nnot Dewy(shelden)\n\nforall x (Settled(x) -> Dewy(x)) <- forall x (Abrupt(x) -> Settled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Durand is tapped. Kristos is acaudal. Lorita is shallow. If something is aftermost then it is not acaudal. All tapped things are xciii. If something is tapped then it is xciii. Smart, shallow things are aftermost. If something is acaudal then it is tapped. All acaudal, stovepiped things are tapped. All xciii things are hostile. Smart, aftermost things are shallow. Kristos is aftermost.", "logic": "\nTapped(durand)\nAcaudal(kristos)\nShallow(lorita)\nforall x (Aftermost(x) -> not Acaudal(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) -> Xciii(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) -> Xciii(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) and Shallow(x) -> Aftermost(x))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) and Stovepiped(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Xciii(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) and Aftermost(x) -> Shallow(x))\n\nAftermost(kristos)\n\nforall x (Tapped(x) and Shallow(x) -> Aftermost(x)) <- forall x (Tapped(x) and Aftermost(x) -> Shallow(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Elfrida is glaring. Josephine is definitive. Nerissa is tried. If something is hermitical then it is not definitive. All glaring things are persuasive. If something is glaring then it is persuasive. Smart, tried things are hermitical. If something is definitive then it is glaring. All definitive, lawless things are glaring. All persuasive things are rouged. Smart, hermitical things are tried. Elfrida is not hermitical.", "logic": "\nGlaring(elfrida)\nDefinitive(josephine)\nTried(nerissa)\nforall x (Hermitical(x) -> not Definitive(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) and Tried(x) -> Hermitical(x))\nforall x (Definitive(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Definitive(x) and Lawless(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) -> Rouged(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) and Hermitical(x) -> Tried(x))\n\nnot Hermitical(elfrida)\n\nforall x (Glaring(x) and Tried(x) -> Hermitical(x)) <- forall x (Glaring(x) and Hermitical(x) -> Tried(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Modestine is gratis. Jacynth is copesettic. Pippy is pavlovian. If something is limitless then it is not copesettic. All gratis things are vasiform. If something is gratis then it is vasiform. Smart, pavlovian things are limitless. If something is copesettic then it is gratis. All copesettic, cosmogonic things are gratis. All vasiform things are weak. Smart, limitless things are pavlovian. Pippy is gratis.", "logic": "\nGratis(modestine)\nCopesettic(jacynth)\nPavlovian(pippy)\nforall x (Limitless(x) -> not Copesettic(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) and Pavlovian(x) -> Limitless(x))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Gratis(x))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Gratis(x))\nforall x (Vasiform(x) -> Weak(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) and Limitless(x) -> Pavlovian(x))\n\nGratis(pippy)\n\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Gratis(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Estel is choric. Ali is indictable. Lynde is thousand. If something is coccygeal then it is not indictable. All choric things are caddish. If something is choric then it is caddish. Smart, thousand things are coccygeal. If something is indictable then it is choric. All indictable, acinous things are choric. All caddish things are haggard. Smart, coccygeal things are thousand. Estel is not acinous.", "logic": "\nChoric(estel)\nIndictable(ali)\nThousand(lynde)\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) -> not Indictable(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) and Thousand(x) -> Coccygeal(x))\nforall x (Indictable(x) -> Choric(x))\nforall x (Indictable(x) and Acinous(x) -> Choric(x))\nforall x (Caddish(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Choric(x) and Coccygeal(x) -> Thousand(x))\n\nnot Acinous(estel)\n\nnot Acinous(estel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Nollie is peaceful. Marjorie is censorial. Gibb is through. If something is esthetical then it is not censorial. All peaceful things are nodular. If something is peaceful then it is nodular. Smart, through things are esthetical. If something is censorial then it is peaceful. All censorial, invisible things are peaceful. All nodular things are abounding. Smart, esthetical things are through. Marjorie is invisible.", "logic": "\nPeaceful(nollie)\nCensorial(marjorie)\nThrough(gibb)\nforall x (Esthetical(x) -> not Censorial(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and Through(x) -> Esthetical(x))\nforall x (Censorial(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Censorial(x) and Invisible(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Nodular(x) -> Abounding(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and Esthetical(x) -> Through(x))\n\nInvisible(marjorie)\n\nInvisible(marjorie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Clovis is squint. Prince is bedewed. Margeaux is fifteenth. If something is east then it is not bedewed. All squint things are unheeded. If something is squint then it is unheeded. Smart, fifteenth things are east. If something is bedewed then it is squint. All bedewed, wintry things are squint. All unheeded things are aperiodic. Smart, east things are fifteenth. Margeaux is not bedewed.", "logic": "\nSquint(clovis)\nBedewed(prince)\nFifteenth(margeaux)\nforall x (East(x) -> not Bedewed(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) and Fifteenth(x) -> East(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) and Wintry(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Unheeded(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) and East(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\n\nnot Bedewed(margeaux)\n\nnot Bedewed(margeaux) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "Marshal is desirous. Magnum is chatoyant. Kenny is inertial. If something is indocile then it is not chatoyant. All desirous things are teen. If something is desirous then it is teen. Smart, inertial things are indocile. If something is chatoyant then it is desirous. All chatoyant, urbanized things are desirous. All teen things are citified. Smart, indocile things are inertial. Marshal is chatoyant.", "logic": "\nDesirous(marshal)\nChatoyant(magnum)\nInertial(kenny)\nforall x (Indocile(x) -> not Chatoyant(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) -> Teen(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) -> Teen(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) and Inertial(x) -> Indocile(x))\nforall x (Chatoyant(x) -> Desirous(x))\nforall x (Chatoyant(x) and Urbanized(x) -> Desirous(x))\nforall x (Teen(x) -> Citified(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) and Indocile(x) -> Inertial(x))\n\nChatoyant(marshal)\n\nChatoyant(marshal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-103"} {"premises": "The stanislaw displace the gasper. The stefan unhand the stanislaw. The stefan is faucal. The stefan displace the gasper. The gasper unhand the stanislaw. The gasper unhand the stefan. The gasper is faucal. The gasper is diamantine. The gasper catechize the stefan. The gasper displace the stefan. If someone unhand the gasper then the gasper is bolshy. If someone unhand the stanislaw then they visit the gasper. If someone unhand the stanislaw then they are cognitive. Kind, faucal people are bolshy. If someone catechize the stanislaw and they visit the gasper then the gasper unhand the stefan. If someone is cognitive and they visit the gasper then they chase the stanislaw. If someone catechize the gasper and the gasper unhand the stanislaw then they do not visit the stefan. If someone is bolshy then they see the stefan. The gasper is faucal.", "logic": "\nDisplace(stanislaw, gasper)\nUnhand(stefan, stanislaw)\nFaucal(stefan)\nDisplace(stefan, gasper)\nUnhand(gasper, stanislaw)\nUnhand(gasper, stefan)\nFaucal(gasper)\nDiamantine(gasper)\nCatechize(gasper, stefan)\nDisplace(gasper, stefan)\nforall x (Unhand(x, gasper) -> Bolshy(gasper))\nforall x (Unhand(x, stanislaw) -> Displace(x, gasper))\nforall x (Unhand(x, stanislaw) -> Cognitive(x))\nforall x (Cognitive(x) and Faucal(x) -> Bolshy(x))\nforall x (Catechize(x, stanislaw) and Displace(x, gasper) -> Unhand(gasper, stefan))\nforall x (Cognitive(x) and Displace(x, gasper) -> Unhand(x, stanislaw))\nforall x (Catechize(x, gasper) and Unhand(gasper, stanislaw) -> not Displace(x, stefan))\nforall x (Bolshy(x) -> Catechize(x, stefan))\n\nFaucal(gasper)\n\ntherefore Faucal(gasper)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The ardra defang the adiana. The xaviera thrum the ardra. The xaviera is logistical. The xaviera defang the adiana. The adiana thrum the ardra. The adiana thrum the xaviera. The adiana is logistical. The adiana is percipient. The adiana laden the xaviera. The adiana defang the xaviera. If someone thrum the adiana then the adiana is unripened. If someone thrum the ardra then they visit the adiana. If someone thrum the ardra then they are puerile. Kind, logistical people are unripened. If someone laden the ardra and they visit the adiana then the adiana thrum the xaviera. If someone is puerile and they visit the adiana then they chase the ardra. If someone laden the adiana and the adiana thrum the ardra then they do not visit the xaviera. If someone is unripened then they see the xaviera. The adiana does not chase the xaviera.", "logic": "\nDefang(ardra, adiana)\nThrum(xaviera, ardra)\nLogistical(xaviera)\nDefang(xaviera, adiana)\nThrum(adiana, ardra)\nThrum(adiana, xaviera)\nLogistical(adiana)\nPercipient(adiana)\nLaden(adiana, xaviera)\nDefang(adiana, xaviera)\nforall x (Thrum(x, adiana) -> Unripened(adiana))\nforall x (Thrum(x, ardra) -> Defang(x, adiana))\nforall x (Thrum(x, ardra) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) and Logistical(x) -> Unripened(x))\nforall x (Laden(x, ardra) and Defang(x, adiana) -> Thrum(adiana, xaviera))\nforall x (Puerile(x) and Defang(x, adiana) -> Thrum(x, ardra))\nforall x (Laden(x, adiana) and Thrum(adiana, ardra) -> not Defang(x, xaviera))\nforall x (Unripened(x) -> Laden(x, xaviera))\n\nnot Thrum(adiana, xaviera)\n\ntherefore Thrum(adiana, xaviera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The berchtold caution the niki. The norah affiance the berchtold. The norah is epiphytic. The norah caution the niki. The niki affiance the berchtold. The niki affiance the norah. The niki is epiphytic. The niki is leafy. The niki oxidize the norah. The niki caution the norah. If someone affiance the niki then the niki is chitinous. If someone affiance the berchtold then they visit the niki. If someone affiance the berchtold then they are interstate. Kind, epiphytic people are chitinous. If someone oxidize the berchtold and they visit the niki then the niki affiance the norah. If someone is interstate and they visit the niki then they chase the berchtold. If someone oxidize the niki and the niki affiance the berchtold then they do not visit the norah. If someone is chitinous then they see the norah. The norah is interstate.", "logic": "\nCaution(berchtold, niki)\nAffiance(norah, berchtold)\nEpiphytic(norah)\nCaution(norah, niki)\nAffiance(niki, berchtold)\nAffiance(niki, norah)\nEpiphytic(niki)\nLeafy(niki)\nOxidize(niki, norah)\nCaution(niki, norah)\nforall x (Affiance(x, niki) -> Chitinous(niki))\nforall x (Affiance(x, berchtold) -> Caution(x, niki))\nforall x (Affiance(x, berchtold) -> Interstate(x))\nforall x (Interstate(x) and Epiphytic(x) -> Chitinous(x))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, berchtold) and Caution(x, niki) -> Affiance(niki, norah))\nforall x (Interstate(x) and Caution(x, niki) -> Affiance(x, berchtold))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, niki) and Affiance(niki, berchtold) -> not Caution(x, norah))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> Oxidize(x, norah))\n\nInterstate(norah)\n\nAffiance(norah, berchtold) and forall x (Affiance(x, berchtold) -> Interstate(x)) -> therefore Interstate(norah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The arthur spellbind the moselle. The kelila deaminate the arthur. The kelila is endowed. The kelila spellbind the moselle. The moselle deaminate the arthur. The moselle deaminate the kelila. The moselle is endowed. The moselle is treed. The moselle flesh the kelila. The moselle spellbind the kelila. If someone deaminate the moselle then the moselle is distaff. If someone deaminate the arthur then they visit the moselle. If someone deaminate the arthur then they are blinding. Kind, endowed people are distaff. If someone flesh the arthur and they visit the moselle then the moselle deaminate the kelila. If someone is blinding and they visit the moselle then they chase the arthur. If someone flesh the moselle and the moselle deaminate the arthur then they do not visit the kelila. If someone is distaff then they see the kelila. The moselle does not visit the moselle.", "logic": "\nSpellbind(arthur, moselle)\nDeaminate(kelila, arthur)\nEndowed(kelila)\nSpellbind(kelila, moselle)\nDeaminate(moselle, arthur)\nDeaminate(moselle, kelila)\nEndowed(moselle)\nTreed(moselle)\nFlesh(moselle, kelila)\nSpellbind(moselle, kelila)\nforall x (Deaminate(x, moselle) -> Distaff(moselle))\nforall x (Deaminate(x, arthur) -> Spellbind(x, moselle))\nforall x (Deaminate(x, arthur) -> Blinding(x))\nforall x (Blinding(x) and Endowed(x) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Flesh(x, arthur) and Spellbind(x, moselle) -> Deaminate(moselle, kelila))\nforall x (Blinding(x) and Spellbind(x, moselle) -> Deaminate(x, arthur))\nforall x (Flesh(x, moselle) and Deaminate(moselle, arthur) -> not Spellbind(x, kelila))\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Flesh(x, kelila))\n\nnot Spellbind(moselle, moselle)\n\nDeaminate(moselle, arthur) and forall x (Deaminate(x, arthur) -> Spellbind(x, moselle)) -> therefore Spellbind(moselle, moselle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The aldwin uprise the jefferson. The beulah acidulate the aldwin. The beulah is juvenile. The beulah uprise the jefferson. The jefferson acidulate the aldwin. The jefferson acidulate the beulah. The jefferson is juvenile. The jefferson is hexagonal. The jefferson canoodle the beulah. The jefferson uprise the beulah. If someone acidulate the jefferson then the jefferson is bony. If someone acidulate the aldwin then they visit the jefferson. If someone acidulate the aldwin then they are atrophied. Kind, juvenile people are bony. If someone canoodle the aldwin and they visit the jefferson then the jefferson acidulate the beulah. If someone is atrophied and they visit the jefferson then they chase the aldwin. If someone canoodle the jefferson and the jefferson acidulate the aldwin then they do not visit the beulah. If someone is bony then they see the beulah. The beulah is bony.", "logic": "\nUprise(aldwin, jefferson)\nAcidulate(beulah, aldwin)\nJuvenile(beulah)\nUprise(beulah, jefferson)\nAcidulate(jefferson, aldwin)\nAcidulate(jefferson, beulah)\nJuvenile(jefferson)\nHexagonal(jefferson)\nCanoodle(jefferson, beulah)\nUprise(jefferson, beulah)\nforall x (Acidulate(x, jefferson) -> Bony(jefferson))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, aldwin) -> Uprise(x, jefferson))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, aldwin) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and Juvenile(x) -> Bony(x))\nforall x (Canoodle(x, aldwin) and Uprise(x, jefferson) -> Acidulate(jefferson, beulah))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and Uprise(x, jefferson) -> Acidulate(x, aldwin))\nforall x (Canoodle(x, jefferson) and Acidulate(jefferson, aldwin) -> not Uprise(x, beulah))\nforall x (Bony(x) -> Canoodle(x, beulah))\n\nBony(beulah)\n\nAcidulate(beulah, aldwin) and forall x (Acidulate(x, aldwin) -> Atrophied(x)) -> therefore Atrophied(beulah) Atrophied(beulah) and Juvenile(beulah) and forall x (Atrophied(x) and Juvenile(x) -> Bony(x)) -> therefore Bony(beulah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The abel necrose the colly. The barron distend the abel. The barron is watercress. The barron necrose the colly. The colly distend the abel. The colly distend the barron. The colly is watercress. The colly is linnean. The colly riot the barron. The colly necrose the barron. If someone distend the colly then the colly is tripping. If someone distend the abel then they visit the colly. If someone distend the abel then they are landlocked. Kind, watercress people are tripping. If someone riot the abel and they visit the colly then the colly distend the barron. If someone is landlocked and they visit the colly then they chase the abel. If someone riot the colly and the colly distend the abel then they do not visit the barron. If someone is tripping then they see the barron. The barron is not tripping.", "logic": "\nNecrose(abel, colly)\nDistend(barron, abel)\nWatercress(barron)\nNecrose(barron, colly)\nDistend(colly, abel)\nDistend(colly, barron)\nWatercress(colly)\nLinnean(colly)\nRiot(colly, barron)\nNecrose(colly, barron)\nforall x (Distend(x, colly) -> Tripping(colly))\nforall x (Distend(x, abel) -> Necrose(x, colly))\nforall x (Distend(x, abel) -> Landlocked(x))\nforall x (Landlocked(x) and Watercress(x) -> Tripping(x))\nforall x (Riot(x, abel) and Necrose(x, colly) -> Distend(colly, barron))\nforall x (Landlocked(x) and Necrose(x, colly) -> Distend(x, abel))\nforall x (Riot(x, colly) and Distend(colly, abel) -> not Necrose(x, barron))\nforall x (Tripping(x) -> Riot(x, barron))\n\nnot Tripping(barron)\n\nDistend(barron, abel) and forall x (Distend(x, abel) -> Landlocked(x)) -> therefore Landlocked(barron) Landlocked(barron) and Watercress(barron) and forall x (Landlocked(x) and Watercress(x) -> Tripping(x)) -> therefore Tripping(barron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The paolo backdate the glynnis. The kraig snoop the paolo. The kraig is loco. The kraig backdate the glynnis. The glynnis snoop the paolo. The glynnis snoop the kraig. The glynnis is loco. The glynnis is cragfast. The glynnis intonate the kraig. The glynnis backdate the kraig. If someone snoop the glynnis then the glynnis is worsening. If someone snoop the paolo then they visit the glynnis. If someone snoop the paolo then they are feudal. Kind, loco people are worsening. If someone intonate the paolo and they visit the glynnis then the glynnis snoop the kraig. If someone is feudal and they visit the glynnis then they chase the paolo. If someone intonate the glynnis and the glynnis snoop the paolo then they do not visit the kraig. If someone is worsening then they see the kraig. The kraig intonate the kraig.", "logic": "\nBackdate(paolo, glynnis)\nSnoop(kraig, paolo)\nLoco(kraig)\nBackdate(kraig, glynnis)\nSnoop(glynnis, paolo)\nSnoop(glynnis, kraig)\nLoco(glynnis)\nCragfast(glynnis)\nIntonate(glynnis, kraig)\nBackdate(glynnis, kraig)\nforall x (Snoop(x, glynnis) -> Worsening(glynnis))\nforall x (Snoop(x, paolo) -> Backdate(x, glynnis))\nforall x (Snoop(x, paolo) -> Feudal(x))\nforall x (Feudal(x) and Loco(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Intonate(x, paolo) and Backdate(x, glynnis) -> Snoop(glynnis, kraig))\nforall x (Feudal(x) and Backdate(x, glynnis) -> Snoop(x, paolo))\nforall x (Intonate(x, glynnis) and Snoop(glynnis, paolo) -> not Backdate(x, kraig))\nforall x (Worsening(x) -> Intonate(x, kraig))\n\nIntonate(kraig, kraig)\n\nSnoop(kraig, paolo) and forall x (Snoop(x, paolo) -> Feudal(x)) -> therefore Feudal(kraig) Feudal(kraig) and Loco(kraig) and forall x (Feudal(x) and Loco(x) -> Worsening(x)) -> therefore Worsening(kraig) Worsening(kraig) and forall x (Worsening(x) -> Intonate(x, kraig)) -> therefore Intonate(kraig, kraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The birdie vaunt the delmar. The henrique fling the birdie. The henrique is slanderous. The henrique vaunt the delmar. The delmar fling the birdie. The delmar fling the henrique. The delmar is slanderous. The delmar is milklike. The delmar toil the henrique. The delmar vaunt the henrique. If someone fling the delmar then the delmar is scorbutic. If someone fling the birdie then they visit the delmar. If someone fling the birdie then they are riblike. Kind, slanderous people are scorbutic. If someone toil the birdie and they visit the delmar then the delmar fling the henrique. If someone is riblike and they visit the delmar then they chase the birdie. If someone toil the delmar and the delmar fling the birdie then they do not visit the henrique. If someone is scorbutic then they see the henrique. The henrique does not see the henrique.", "logic": "\nVaunt(birdie, delmar)\nFling(henrique, birdie)\nSlanderous(henrique)\nVaunt(henrique, delmar)\nFling(delmar, birdie)\nFling(delmar, henrique)\nSlanderous(delmar)\nMilklike(delmar)\nToil(delmar, henrique)\nVaunt(delmar, henrique)\nforall x (Fling(x, delmar) -> Scorbutic(delmar))\nforall x (Fling(x, birdie) -> Vaunt(x, delmar))\nforall x (Fling(x, birdie) -> Riblike(x))\nforall x (Riblike(x) and Slanderous(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\nforall x (Toil(x, birdie) and Vaunt(x, delmar) -> Fling(delmar, henrique))\nforall x (Riblike(x) and Vaunt(x, delmar) -> Fling(x, birdie))\nforall x (Toil(x, delmar) and Fling(delmar, birdie) -> not Vaunt(x, henrique))\nforall x (Scorbutic(x) -> Toil(x, henrique))\n\nnot Toil(henrique, henrique)\n\nFling(henrique, birdie) and forall x (Fling(x, birdie) -> Riblike(x)) -> therefore Riblike(henrique) Riblike(henrique) and Slanderous(henrique) and forall x (Riblike(x) and Slanderous(x) -> Scorbutic(x)) -> therefore Scorbutic(henrique) Scorbutic(henrique) and forall x (Scorbutic(x) -> Toil(x, henrique)) -> therefore Toil(henrique, henrique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The betta belay the raphaela. The aileen goof the betta. The aileen is bankable. The aileen belay the raphaela. The raphaela goof the betta. The raphaela goof the aileen. The raphaela is bankable. The raphaela is fanatical. The raphaela disoblige the aileen. The raphaela belay the aileen. If someone goof the raphaela then the raphaela is acidulent. If someone goof the betta then they visit the raphaela. If someone goof the betta then they are chesty. Kind, bankable people are acidulent. If someone disoblige the betta and they visit the raphaela then the raphaela goof the aileen. If someone is chesty and they visit the raphaela then they chase the betta. If someone disoblige the raphaela and the raphaela goof the betta then they do not visit the aileen. If someone is acidulent then they see the aileen. The betta does not chase the betta.", "logic": "\nBelay(betta, raphaela)\nGoof(aileen, betta)\nBankable(aileen)\nBelay(aileen, raphaela)\nGoof(raphaela, betta)\nGoof(raphaela, aileen)\nBankable(raphaela)\nFanatical(raphaela)\nDisoblige(raphaela, aileen)\nBelay(raphaela, aileen)\nforall x (Goof(x, raphaela) -> Acidulent(raphaela))\nforall x (Goof(x, betta) -> Belay(x, raphaela))\nforall x (Goof(x, betta) -> Chesty(x))\nforall x (Chesty(x) and Bankable(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, betta) and Belay(x, raphaela) -> Goof(raphaela, aileen))\nforall x (Chesty(x) and Belay(x, raphaela) -> Goof(x, betta))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, raphaela) and Goof(raphaela, betta) -> not Belay(x, aileen))\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Disoblige(x, aileen))\n\nnot Goof(betta, betta)\n\nforall x (Chesty(x) and Belay(x, raphaela) -> Goof(x, betta)) <- forall x (Goof(x, betta) -> Chesty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The berrie barrel the lukas. The maryjane constrain the berrie. The maryjane is consolable. The maryjane barrel the lukas. The lukas constrain the berrie. The lukas constrain the maryjane. The lukas is consolable. The lukas is grassless. The lukas satirize the maryjane. The lukas barrel the maryjane. If someone constrain the lukas then the lukas is cliched. If someone constrain the berrie then they visit the lukas. If someone constrain the berrie then they are sighted. Kind, consolable people are cliched. If someone satirize the berrie and they visit the lukas then the lukas constrain the maryjane. If someone is sighted and they visit the lukas then they chase the berrie. If someone satirize the lukas and the lukas constrain the berrie then they do not visit the maryjane. If someone is cliched then they see the maryjane. The berrie is cliched.", "logic": "\nBarrel(berrie, lukas)\nConstrain(maryjane, berrie)\nConsolable(maryjane)\nBarrel(maryjane, lukas)\nConstrain(lukas, berrie)\nConstrain(lukas, maryjane)\nConsolable(lukas)\nGrassless(lukas)\nSatirize(lukas, maryjane)\nBarrel(lukas, maryjane)\nforall x (Constrain(x, lukas) -> Cliched(lukas))\nforall x (Constrain(x, berrie) -> Barrel(x, lukas))\nforall x (Constrain(x, berrie) -> Sighted(x))\nforall x (Sighted(x) and Consolable(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Satirize(x, berrie) and Barrel(x, lukas) -> Constrain(lukas, maryjane))\nforall x (Sighted(x) and Barrel(x, lukas) -> Constrain(x, berrie))\nforall x (Satirize(x, lukas) and Constrain(lukas, berrie) -> not Barrel(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Satirize(x, maryjane))\n\nCliched(berrie)\n\nforall x (Sighted(x) and Consolable(x) -> Cliched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The cindee refurnish the jordain. The kaari knit the cindee. The kaari is elegiac. The kaari refurnish the jordain. The jordain knit the cindee. The jordain knit the kaari. The jordain is elegiac. The jordain is geophytic. The jordain curry the kaari. The jordain refurnish the kaari. If someone knit the jordain then the jordain is frowzled. If someone knit the cindee then they visit the jordain. If someone knit the cindee then they are metameric. Kind, elegiac people are frowzled. If someone curry the cindee and they visit the jordain then the jordain knit the kaari. If someone is metameric and they visit the jordain then they chase the cindee. If someone curry the jordain and the jordain knit the cindee then they do not visit the kaari. If someone is frowzled then they see the kaari. The cindee is not metameric.", "logic": "\nRefurnish(cindee, jordain)\nKnit(kaari, cindee)\nElegiac(kaari)\nRefurnish(kaari, jordain)\nKnit(jordain, cindee)\nKnit(jordain, kaari)\nElegiac(jordain)\nGeophytic(jordain)\nCurry(jordain, kaari)\nRefurnish(jordain, kaari)\nforall x (Knit(x, jordain) -> Frowzled(jordain))\nforall x (Knit(x, cindee) -> Refurnish(x, jordain))\nforall x (Knit(x, cindee) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Metameric(x) and Elegiac(x) -> Frowzled(x))\nforall x (Curry(x, cindee) and Refurnish(x, jordain) -> Knit(jordain, kaari))\nforall x (Metameric(x) and Refurnish(x, jordain) -> Knit(x, cindee))\nforall x (Curry(x, jordain) and Knit(jordain, cindee) -> not Refurnish(x, kaari))\nforall x (Frowzled(x) -> Curry(x, kaari))\n\nnot Metameric(cindee)\n\nforall x (Knit(x, cindee) -> Metameric(x)) <- forall x (Metameric(x) and Refurnish(x, jordain) -> Knit(x, cindee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The kelwin nasalise the adoree. The oren castle the kelwin. The oren is endermic. The oren nasalise the adoree. The adoree castle the kelwin. The adoree castle the oren. The adoree is endermic. The adoree is unframed. The adoree purge the oren. The adoree nasalise the oren. If someone castle the adoree then the adoree is opalescent. If someone castle the kelwin then they visit the adoree. If someone castle the kelwin then they are regimented. Kind, endermic people are opalescent. If someone purge the kelwin and they visit the adoree then the adoree castle the oren. If someone is regimented and they visit the adoree then they chase the kelwin. If someone purge the adoree and the adoree castle the kelwin then they do not visit the oren. If someone is opalescent then they see the oren. The kelwin purge the oren.", "logic": "\nNasalise(kelwin, adoree)\nCastle(oren, kelwin)\nEndermic(oren)\nNasalise(oren, adoree)\nCastle(adoree, kelwin)\nCastle(adoree, oren)\nEndermic(adoree)\nUnframed(adoree)\nPurge(adoree, oren)\nNasalise(adoree, oren)\nforall x (Castle(x, adoree) -> Opalescent(adoree))\nforall x (Castle(x, kelwin) -> Nasalise(x, adoree))\nforall x (Castle(x, kelwin) -> Regimented(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) and Endermic(x) -> Opalescent(x))\nforall x (Purge(x, kelwin) and Nasalise(x, adoree) -> Castle(adoree, oren))\nforall x (Regimented(x) and Nasalise(x, adoree) -> Castle(x, kelwin))\nforall x (Purge(x, adoree) and Castle(adoree, kelwin) -> not Nasalise(x, oren))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) -> Purge(x, oren))\n\nPurge(kelwin, oren)\n\nforall x (Opalescent(x) -> Purge(x, oren)) <- forall x (Regimented(x) and Endermic(x) -> Opalescent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The tamma discompose the karalee. The marion jelly the tamma. The marion is bilinear. The marion discompose the karalee. The karalee jelly the tamma. The karalee jelly the marion. The karalee is bilinear. The karalee is flickering. The karalee filet the marion. The karalee discompose the marion. If someone jelly the karalee then the karalee is subnormal. If someone jelly the tamma then they visit the karalee. If someone jelly the tamma then they are tactful. Kind, bilinear people are subnormal. If someone filet the tamma and they visit the karalee then the karalee jelly the marion. If someone is tactful and they visit the karalee then they chase the tamma. If someone filet the karalee and the karalee jelly the tamma then they do not visit the marion. If someone is subnormal then they see the marion. The tamma does not see the tamma.", "logic": "\nDiscompose(tamma, karalee)\nJelly(marion, tamma)\nBilinear(marion)\nDiscompose(marion, karalee)\nJelly(karalee, tamma)\nJelly(karalee, marion)\nBilinear(karalee)\nFlickering(karalee)\nFilet(karalee, marion)\nDiscompose(karalee, marion)\nforall x (Jelly(x, karalee) -> Subnormal(karalee))\nforall x (Jelly(x, tamma) -> Discompose(x, karalee))\nforall x (Jelly(x, tamma) -> Tactful(x))\nforall x (Tactful(x) and Bilinear(x) -> Subnormal(x))\nforall x (Filet(x, tamma) and Discompose(x, karalee) -> Jelly(karalee, marion))\nforall x (Tactful(x) and Discompose(x, karalee) -> Jelly(x, tamma))\nforall x (Filet(x, karalee) and Jelly(karalee, tamma) -> not Discompose(x, marion))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) -> Filet(x, marion))\n\nnot Filet(tamma, tamma)\n\nnot Filet(tamma, tamma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The remington unbolt the mariette. The rebecka espy the remington. The rebecka is puranic. The rebecka unbolt the mariette. The mariette espy the remington. The mariette espy the rebecka. The mariette is puranic. The mariette is washy. The mariette heist the rebecka. The mariette unbolt the rebecka. If someone espy the mariette then the mariette is agitating. If someone espy the remington then they visit the mariette. If someone espy the remington then they are divergent. Kind, puranic people are agitating. If someone heist the remington and they visit the mariette then the mariette espy the rebecka. If someone is divergent and they visit the mariette then they chase the remington. If someone heist the mariette and the mariette espy the remington then they do not visit the rebecka. If someone is agitating then they see the rebecka. The rebecka is washy.", "logic": "\nUnbolt(remington, mariette)\nEspy(rebecka, remington)\nPuranic(rebecka)\nUnbolt(rebecka, mariette)\nEspy(mariette, remington)\nEspy(mariette, rebecka)\nPuranic(mariette)\nWashy(mariette)\nHeist(mariette, rebecka)\nUnbolt(mariette, rebecka)\nforall x (Espy(x, mariette) -> Agitating(mariette))\nforall x (Espy(x, remington) -> Unbolt(x, mariette))\nforall x (Espy(x, remington) -> Divergent(x))\nforall x (Divergent(x) and Puranic(x) -> Agitating(x))\nforall x (Heist(x, remington) and Unbolt(x, mariette) -> Espy(mariette, rebecka))\nforall x (Divergent(x) and Unbolt(x, mariette) -> Espy(x, remington))\nforall x (Heist(x, mariette) and Espy(mariette, remington) -> not Unbolt(x, rebecka))\nforall x (Agitating(x) -> Heist(x, rebecka))\n\nWashy(rebecka)\n\nWashy(rebecka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The candra succour the cherin. The karlen barricado the candra. The karlen is ionised. The karlen succour the cherin. The cherin barricado the candra. The cherin barricado the karlen. The cherin is ionised. The cherin is essene. The cherin motorcycle the karlen. The cherin succour the karlen. If someone barricado the cherin then the cherin is nonhuman. If someone barricado the candra then they visit the cherin. If someone barricado the candra then they are perigonal. Kind, ionised people are nonhuman. If someone motorcycle the candra and they visit the cherin then the cherin barricado the karlen. If someone is perigonal and they visit the cherin then they chase the candra. If someone motorcycle the cherin and the cherin barricado the candra then they do not visit the karlen. If someone is nonhuman then they see the karlen. The karlen does not see the cherin.", "logic": "\nSuccour(candra, cherin)\nBarricado(karlen, candra)\nIonised(karlen)\nSuccour(karlen, cherin)\nBarricado(cherin, candra)\nBarricado(cherin, karlen)\nIonised(cherin)\nEssene(cherin)\nMotorcycle(cherin, karlen)\nSuccour(cherin, karlen)\nforall x (Barricado(x, cherin) -> Nonhuman(cherin))\nforall x (Barricado(x, candra) -> Succour(x, cherin))\nforall x (Barricado(x, candra) -> Perigonal(x))\nforall x (Perigonal(x) and Ionised(x) -> Nonhuman(x))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, candra) and Succour(x, cherin) -> Barricado(cherin, karlen))\nforall x (Perigonal(x) and Succour(x, cherin) -> Barricado(x, candra))\nforall x (Motorcycle(x, cherin) and Barricado(cherin, candra) -> not Succour(x, karlen))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) -> Motorcycle(x, karlen))\n\nnot Motorcycle(karlen, cherin)\n\nnot Motorcycle(karlen, cherin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The guinna moot the chelsy. The lynnelle rappel the guinna. The lynnelle is pleased. The lynnelle moot the chelsy. The chelsy rappel the guinna. The chelsy rappel the lynnelle. The chelsy is pleased. The chelsy is unmanlike. The chelsy maunder the lynnelle. The chelsy moot the lynnelle. If someone rappel the chelsy then the chelsy is putative. If someone rappel the guinna then they visit the chelsy. If someone rappel the guinna then they are nutrient. Kind, pleased people are putative. If someone maunder the guinna and they visit the chelsy then the chelsy rappel the lynnelle. If someone is nutrient and they visit the chelsy then they chase the guinna. If someone maunder the chelsy and the chelsy rappel the guinna then they do not visit the lynnelle. If someone is putative then they see the lynnelle. The guinna moot the guinna.", "logic": "\nMoot(guinna, chelsy)\nRappel(lynnelle, guinna)\nPleased(lynnelle)\nMoot(lynnelle, chelsy)\nRappel(chelsy, guinna)\nRappel(chelsy, lynnelle)\nPleased(chelsy)\nUnmanlike(chelsy)\nMaunder(chelsy, lynnelle)\nMoot(chelsy, lynnelle)\nforall x (Rappel(x, chelsy) -> Putative(chelsy))\nforall x (Rappel(x, guinna) -> Moot(x, chelsy))\nforall x (Rappel(x, guinna) -> Nutrient(x))\nforall x (Nutrient(x) and Pleased(x) -> Putative(x))\nforall x (Maunder(x, guinna) and Moot(x, chelsy) -> Rappel(chelsy, lynnelle))\nforall x (Nutrient(x) and Moot(x, chelsy) -> Rappel(x, guinna))\nforall x (Maunder(x, chelsy) and Rappel(chelsy, guinna) -> not Moot(x, lynnelle))\nforall x (Putative(x) -> Maunder(x, lynnelle))\n\nMoot(guinna, guinna)\n\nMoot(guinna, guinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "Glynn is not mongolian. Glynn is gradual. Rosie is menopausal. Rosie is mongolian. Rosie is penurious. Rosie is gradual. Rosie is not cagy. Candace is menopausal. Candace is not epimorphic. Candace is cagy. If someone is mongolian then they are obliged. Furry people are menopausal. Rosie is not cagy.", "logic": "\nnot Mongolian(glynn)\nGradual(glynn)\nMenopausal(rosie)\nMongolian(rosie)\nPenurious(rosie)\nGradual(rosie)\nnot Cagy(rosie)\nMenopausal(candace)\nnot Epimorphic(candace)\nCagy(candace)\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Obliged(x))\nforall x (Epimorphic(x) -> Menopausal(x))\n\nnot Cagy(rosie)\n\ntherefore not Cagy(rosie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Milka is not humanistic. Milka is inheriting. Dasha is obvious. Dasha is humanistic. Dasha is fringed. Dasha is inheriting. Dasha is not alpestrine. Parnell is obvious. Parnell is not reechoing. Parnell is alpestrine. If someone is humanistic then they are shattered. Furry people are obvious. Dasha is not obvious.", "logic": "\nnot Humanistic(milka)\nInheriting(milka)\nObvious(dasha)\nHumanistic(dasha)\nFringed(dasha)\nInheriting(dasha)\nnot Alpestrine(dasha)\nObvious(parnell)\nnot Reechoing(parnell)\nAlpestrine(parnell)\nforall x (Humanistic(x) -> Shattered(x))\nforall x (Reechoing(x) -> Obvious(x))\n\nnot Obvious(dasha)\n\ntherefore Obvious(dasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Alethea is not tympanitic. Alethea is penciled. Barbee is bilocular. Barbee is tympanitic. Barbee is detestable. Barbee is penciled. Barbee is not bladed. Ambrose is bilocular. Ambrose is not outraged. Ambrose is bladed. If someone is tympanitic then they are osteal. Furry people are bilocular. Barbee is osteal.", "logic": "\nnot Tympanitic(alethea)\nPenciled(alethea)\nBilocular(barbee)\nTympanitic(barbee)\nDetestable(barbee)\nPenciled(barbee)\nnot Bladed(barbee)\nBilocular(ambrose)\nnot Outraged(ambrose)\nBladed(ambrose)\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Osteal(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) -> Bilocular(x))\n\nOsteal(barbee)\n\nTympanitic(barbee) and forall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Osteal(x)) -> therefore Osteal(barbee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Traci is not helpless. Traci is aplanatic. Samuela is umber. Samuela is helpless. Samuela is cerulean. Samuela is aplanatic. Samuela is not exsanguine. Ferne is umber. Ferne is not moravian. Ferne is exsanguine. If someone is helpless then they are rumanian. Furry people are umber. Samuela is not rumanian.", "logic": "\nnot Helpless(traci)\nAplanatic(traci)\nUmber(samuela)\nHelpless(samuela)\nCerulean(samuela)\nAplanatic(samuela)\nnot Exsanguine(samuela)\nUmber(ferne)\nnot Moravian(ferne)\nExsanguine(ferne)\nforall x (Helpless(x) -> Rumanian(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> Umber(x))\n\nnot Rumanian(samuela)\n\nHelpless(samuela) and forall x (Helpless(x) -> Rumanian(x)) -> therefore Rumanian(samuela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Anders is not firstborn. Anders is unbolted. Bryana is darkened. Bryana is firstborn. Bryana is intertidal. Bryana is unbolted. Bryana is not rampant. Bernadina is darkened. Bernadina is not opencut. Bernadina is rampant. If someone is firstborn then they are weighty. Furry people are darkened. Anders is not darkened.", "logic": "\nnot Firstborn(anders)\nUnbolted(anders)\nDarkened(bryana)\nFirstborn(bryana)\nIntertidal(bryana)\nUnbolted(bryana)\nnot Rampant(bryana)\nDarkened(bernadina)\nnot Opencut(bernadina)\nRampant(bernadina)\nforall x (Firstborn(x) -> Weighty(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> Darkened(x))\n\nnot Darkened(anders)\n\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> Darkened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Merill is not atoxic. Merill is repeatable. Candis is greyed. Candis is atoxic. Candis is worst. Candis is repeatable. Candis is not changed. Walther is greyed. Walther is not shitless. Walther is changed. If someone is atoxic then they are casebook. Furry people are greyed. Merill is casebook.", "logic": "\nnot Atoxic(merill)\nRepeatable(merill)\nGreyed(candis)\nAtoxic(candis)\nWorst(candis)\nRepeatable(candis)\nnot Changed(candis)\nGreyed(walther)\nnot Shitless(walther)\nChanged(walther)\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Casebook(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Greyed(x))\n\nCasebook(merill)\n\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Casebook(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Bobette is not errant. Bobette is septicemic. Onida is catching. Onida is errant. Onida is trilingual. Onida is septicemic. Onida is not publicized. Darcy is catching. Darcy is not revered. Darcy is publicized. If someone is errant then they are chaldean. Furry people are catching. Darcy is not septicemic.", "logic": "\nnot Errant(bobette)\nSepticemic(bobette)\nCatching(onida)\nErrant(onida)\nTrilingual(onida)\nSepticemic(onida)\nnot Publicized(onida)\nCatching(darcy)\nnot Revered(darcy)\nPublicized(darcy)\nforall x (Errant(x) -> Chaldean(x))\nforall x (Revered(x) -> Catching(x))\n\nnot Septicemic(darcy)\n\nnot Septicemic(darcy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Nickie is not astronomic. Nickie is grasping. Ranee is flamboyant. Ranee is astronomic. Ranee is unpolluted. Ranee is grasping. Ranee is not requested. Pearle is flamboyant. Pearle is not earliest. Pearle is requested. If someone is astronomic then they are seeing. Furry people are flamboyant. Ranee is earliest.", "logic": "\nnot Astronomic(nickie)\nGrasping(nickie)\nFlamboyant(ranee)\nAstronomic(ranee)\nUnpolluted(ranee)\nGrasping(ranee)\nnot Requested(ranee)\nFlamboyant(pearle)\nnot Earliest(pearle)\nRequested(pearle)\nforall x (Astronomic(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\n\nEarliest(ranee)\n\nEarliest(ranee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2693"} {"premises": "Emmit is celibate. Emmit is chalky. Emmit is subalpine. Padraig is frothy. Padraig is celibate. Padraig is chalky. Padraig is aliform. If Emmit is frothy then Emmit is bellicose. If something is celibate then it is bellicose. Emmit is celibate.", "logic": "\nCelibate(emmit)\nChalky(emmit)\nSubalpine(emmit)\nFrothy(padraig)\nCelibate(padraig)\nChalky(padraig)\nAliform(padraig)\nFrothy(emmit) -> Bellicose(emmit)\nforall x (Celibate(x) -> Bellicose(x))\n\nCelibate(emmit)\n\ntherefore Celibate(emmit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7004"} {"premises": "Nixie is darkening. Nixie is squashy. Nixie is regulation. Woody is driving. Woody is darkening. Woody is squashy. Woody is autologous. If Nixie is driving then Nixie is unheated. If something is darkening then it is unheated. Nixie is not squashy.", "logic": "\nDarkening(nixie)\nSquashy(nixie)\nRegulation(nixie)\nDriving(woody)\nDarkening(woody)\nSquashy(woody)\nAutologous(woody)\nDriving(nixie) -> Unheated(nixie)\nforall x (Darkening(x) -> Unheated(x))\n\nnot Squashy(nixie)\n\ntherefore Squashy(nixie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7004"} {"premises": "Garrot is credal. Garrot is exogamic. Garrot is adoring. Wallie is achy. Wallie is credal. Wallie is exogamic. Wallie is mixed. If Garrot is achy then Garrot is thrombosed. If something is credal then it is thrombosed. Garrot is not achy.", "logic": "\nCredal(garrot)\nExogamic(garrot)\nAdoring(garrot)\nAchy(wallie)\nCredal(wallie)\nExogamic(wallie)\nMixed(wallie)\nAchy(garrot) -> Thrombosed(garrot)\nforall x (Credal(x) -> Thrombosed(x))\n\nnot Achy(garrot)\n\nnot Achy(garrot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7004"} {"premises": "Ranee is salty. Ranee is embezzled. Ranee is buddhistic. Pet is decumbent. Pet is salty. Pet is embezzled. Pet is rhetorical. If Ranee is decumbent then Ranee is haphazard. If something is salty then it is haphazard. Pet is white.", "logic": "\nSalty(ranee)\nEmbezzled(ranee)\nBuddhistic(ranee)\nDecumbent(pet)\nSalty(pet)\nEmbezzled(pet)\nRhetorical(pet)\nDecumbent(ranee) -> Haphazard(ranee)\nforall x (Salty(x) -> Haphazard(x))\n\nWhite(pet)\n\nWhite(pet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7004"} {"premises": "The jillene festinate the sheri. The jillene does not chase the red. The jillene is paltry. The jillene is battered. The jillene miscall the sheri. The jillene does not like the red. The jillene miscall the nancee. The jillene crouch the nancee. The sheri is starless. The sheri miscall the jillene. The sheri miscall the nancee. The sheri crouch the nancee. The red festinate the sheri. The red does not need the jillene. The nancee miscall the red. If the jillene is battered then the jillene festinate the nancee. If something festinate the nancee then the nancee crouch the jillene. If the nancee crouch the jillene and the jillene miscall the sheri then the sheri crouch the jillene. If something crouch the red and the red is adjacent then the red crouch the sheri. If something crouch the nancee and it does not need the sheri then the nancee is not paltry. If something is battered and not paltry then it is starless. If the red is not starless then the red is not basaltic. If the sheri is starless and the sheri festinate the red then the red is basaltic. The jillene is battered.", "logic": "\nFestinate(jillene, sheri)\nnot Festinate(jillene, red)\nPaltry(jillene)\nBattered(jillene)\nMiscall(jillene, sheri)\nnot Miscall(jillene, red)\nMiscall(jillene, nancee)\nCrouch(jillene, nancee)\nStarless(sheri)\nMiscall(sheri, jillene)\nMiscall(sheri, nancee)\nCrouch(sheri, nancee)\nFestinate(red, sheri)\nnot Crouch(red, jillene)\nMiscall(nancee, red)\nBattered(jillene) -> Festinate(jillene, nancee)\nforall x (Festinate(x, nancee) -> Crouch(nancee, jillene))\nCrouch(nancee, jillene) and Miscall(jillene, sheri) -> Crouch(sheri, jillene)\nforall x (Crouch(x, red) and Adjacent(red) -> Crouch(red, sheri))\nforall x (Crouch(x, nancee) and not Crouch(x, sheri) -> not Paltry(nancee))\nforall x (Battered(x) and not Paltry(x) -> Starless(x))\nnot Starless(red) -> not Basaltic(red)\nStarless(sheri) and Festinate(sheri, red) -> Basaltic(red)\n\nBattered(jillene)\n\ntherefore Battered(jillene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The thorndike combat the ricca. The thorndike does not chase the susanne. The thorndike is exacting. The thorndike is filarial. The thorndike braze the ricca. The thorndike does not like the susanne. The thorndike braze the mellissa. The thorndike recycle the mellissa. The ricca is unheeded. The ricca braze the thorndike. The ricca braze the mellissa. The ricca recycle the mellissa. The susanne combat the ricca. The susanne does not need the thorndike. The mellissa braze the susanne. If the thorndike is filarial then the thorndike combat the mellissa. If something combat the mellissa then the mellissa recycle the thorndike. If the mellissa recycle the thorndike and the thorndike braze the ricca then the ricca recycle the thorndike. If something recycle the susanne and the susanne is entozoan then the susanne recycle the ricca. If something recycle the mellissa and it does not need the ricca then the mellissa is not exacting. If something is filarial and not exacting then it is unheeded. If the susanne is not unheeded then the susanne is not outback. If the ricca is unheeded and the ricca combat the susanne then the susanne is outback. The susanne recycle the thorndike.", "logic": "\nCombat(thorndike, ricca)\nnot Combat(thorndike, susanne)\nExacting(thorndike)\nFilarial(thorndike)\nBraze(thorndike, ricca)\nnot Braze(thorndike, susanne)\nBraze(thorndike, mellissa)\nRecycle(thorndike, mellissa)\nUnheeded(ricca)\nBraze(ricca, thorndike)\nBraze(ricca, mellissa)\nRecycle(ricca, mellissa)\nCombat(susanne, ricca)\nnot Recycle(susanne, thorndike)\nBraze(mellissa, susanne)\nFilarial(thorndike) -> Combat(thorndike, mellissa)\nforall x (Combat(x, mellissa) -> Recycle(mellissa, thorndike))\nRecycle(mellissa, thorndike) and Braze(thorndike, ricca) -> Recycle(ricca, thorndike)\nforall x (Recycle(x, susanne) and Entozoan(susanne) -> Recycle(susanne, ricca))\nforall x (Recycle(x, mellissa) and not Recycle(x, ricca) -> not Exacting(mellissa))\nforall x (Filarial(x) and not Exacting(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nnot Unheeded(susanne) -> not Outback(susanne)\nUnheeded(ricca) and Combat(ricca, susanne) -> Outback(susanne)\n\nRecycle(susanne, thorndike)\n\ntherefore not Recycle(susanne, thorndike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The lynne commentate the fox. The lynne does not chase the whitman. The lynne is erstwhile. The lynne is flavorous. The lynne balkanise the fox. The lynne does not like the whitman. The lynne balkanise the ian. The lynne grate the ian. The fox is cortical. The fox balkanise the lynne. The fox balkanise the ian. The fox grate the ian. The whitman commentate the fox. The whitman does not need the lynne. The ian balkanise the whitman. If the lynne is flavorous then the lynne commentate the ian. If something commentate the ian then the ian grate the lynne. If the ian grate the lynne and the lynne balkanise the fox then the fox grate the lynne. If something grate the whitman and the whitman is caseous then the whitman grate the fox. If something grate the ian and it does not need the fox then the ian is not erstwhile. If something is flavorous and not erstwhile then it is cortical. If the whitman is not cortical then the whitman is not tapped. If the fox is cortical and the fox commentate the whitman then the whitman is tapped. The lynne commentate the ian.", "logic": "\nCommentate(lynne, fox)\nnot Commentate(lynne, whitman)\nErstwhile(lynne)\nFlavorous(lynne)\nBalkanise(lynne, fox)\nnot Balkanise(lynne, whitman)\nBalkanise(lynne, ian)\nGrate(lynne, ian)\nCortical(fox)\nBalkanise(fox, lynne)\nBalkanise(fox, ian)\nGrate(fox, ian)\nCommentate(whitman, fox)\nnot Grate(whitman, lynne)\nBalkanise(ian, whitman)\nFlavorous(lynne) -> Commentate(lynne, ian)\nforall x (Commentate(x, ian) -> Grate(ian, lynne))\nGrate(ian, lynne) and Balkanise(lynne, fox) -> Grate(fox, lynne)\nforall x (Grate(x, whitman) and Caseous(whitman) -> Grate(whitman, fox))\nforall x (Grate(x, ian) and not Grate(x, fox) -> not Erstwhile(ian))\nforall x (Flavorous(x) and not Erstwhile(x) -> Cortical(x))\nnot Cortical(whitman) -> not Tapped(whitman)\nCortical(fox) and Commentate(fox, whitman) -> Tapped(whitman)\n\nCommentate(lynne, ian)\n\nFlavorous(lynne) and Flavorous(lynne) -> Commentate(lynne, ian) -> therefore Commentate(lynne, ian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The nicolea prick the liana. The nicolea does not chase the vanessa. The nicolea is dislikable. The nicolea is ratty. The nicolea benight the liana. The nicolea does not like the vanessa. The nicolea benight the hayden. The nicolea rubify the hayden. The liana is cuspidated. The liana benight the nicolea. The liana benight the hayden. The liana rubify the hayden. The vanessa prick the liana. The vanessa does not need the nicolea. The hayden benight the vanessa. If the nicolea is ratty then the nicolea prick the hayden. If something prick the hayden then the hayden rubify the nicolea. If the hayden rubify the nicolea and the nicolea benight the liana then the liana rubify the nicolea. If something rubify the vanessa and the vanessa is airborne then the vanessa rubify the liana. If something rubify the hayden and it does not need the liana then the hayden is not dislikable. If something is ratty and not dislikable then it is cuspidated. If the vanessa is not cuspidated then the vanessa is not urbanised. If the liana is cuspidated and the liana prick the vanessa then the vanessa is urbanised. The nicolea does not chase the hayden.", "logic": "\nPrick(nicolea, liana)\nnot Prick(nicolea, vanessa)\nDislikable(nicolea)\nRatty(nicolea)\nBenight(nicolea, liana)\nnot Benight(nicolea, vanessa)\nBenight(nicolea, hayden)\nRubify(nicolea, hayden)\nCuspidated(liana)\nBenight(liana, nicolea)\nBenight(liana, hayden)\nRubify(liana, hayden)\nPrick(vanessa, liana)\nnot Rubify(vanessa, nicolea)\nBenight(hayden, vanessa)\nRatty(nicolea) -> Prick(nicolea, hayden)\nforall x (Prick(x, hayden) -> Rubify(hayden, nicolea))\nRubify(hayden, nicolea) and Benight(nicolea, liana) -> Rubify(liana, nicolea)\nforall x (Rubify(x, vanessa) and Airborne(vanessa) -> Rubify(vanessa, liana))\nforall x (Rubify(x, hayden) and not Rubify(x, liana) -> not Dislikable(hayden))\nforall x (Ratty(x) and not Dislikable(x) -> Cuspidated(x))\nnot Cuspidated(vanessa) -> not Urbanised(vanessa)\nCuspidated(liana) and Prick(liana, vanessa) -> Urbanised(vanessa)\n\nnot Prick(nicolea, hayden)\n\nRatty(nicolea) and Ratty(nicolea) -> Prick(nicolea, hayden) -> therefore Prick(nicolea, hayden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The gwenore surpass the engracia. The gwenore does not chase the peyton. The gwenore is satisfied. The gwenore is allusive. The gwenore blurt the engracia. The gwenore does not like the peyton. The gwenore blurt the gianina. The gwenore notarise the gianina. The engracia is bruneian. The engracia blurt the gwenore. The engracia blurt the gianina. The engracia notarise the gianina. The peyton surpass the engracia. The peyton does not need the gwenore. The gianina blurt the peyton. If the gwenore is allusive then the gwenore surpass the gianina. If something surpass the gianina then the gianina notarise the gwenore. If the gianina notarise the gwenore and the gwenore blurt the engracia then the engracia notarise the gwenore. If something notarise the peyton and the peyton is odorless then the peyton notarise the engracia. If something notarise the gianina and it does not need the engracia then the gianina is not satisfied. If something is allusive and not satisfied then it is bruneian. If the peyton is not bruneian then the peyton is not otiose. If the engracia is bruneian and the engracia surpass the peyton then the peyton is otiose. The gianina notarise the gwenore.", "logic": "\nSurpass(gwenore, engracia)\nnot Surpass(gwenore, peyton)\nSatisfied(gwenore)\nAllusive(gwenore)\nBlurt(gwenore, engracia)\nnot Blurt(gwenore, peyton)\nBlurt(gwenore, gianina)\nNotarise(gwenore, gianina)\nBruneian(engracia)\nBlurt(engracia, gwenore)\nBlurt(engracia, gianina)\nNotarise(engracia, gianina)\nSurpass(peyton, engracia)\nnot Notarise(peyton, gwenore)\nBlurt(gianina, peyton)\nAllusive(gwenore) -> Surpass(gwenore, gianina)\nforall x (Surpass(x, gianina) -> Notarise(gianina, gwenore))\nNotarise(gianina, gwenore) and Blurt(gwenore, engracia) -> Notarise(engracia, gwenore)\nforall x (Notarise(x, peyton) and Odorless(peyton) -> Notarise(peyton, engracia))\nforall x (Notarise(x, gianina) and not Notarise(x, engracia) -> not Satisfied(gianina))\nforall x (Allusive(x) and not Satisfied(x) -> Bruneian(x))\nnot Bruneian(peyton) -> not Otiose(peyton)\nBruneian(engracia) and Surpass(engracia, peyton) -> Otiose(peyton)\n\nNotarise(gianina, gwenore)\n\nAllusive(gwenore) and Allusive(gwenore) -> Surpass(gwenore, gianina) -> therefore Surpass(gwenore, gianina) Surpass(gwenore, gianina) and forall x (Surpass(x, gianina) -> Notarise(gianina, gwenore)) -> therefore Notarise(gianina, gwenore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The hiralal restock the benji. The hiralal does not chase the mattie. The hiralal is palmar. The hiralal is faultless. The hiralal denigrate the benji. The hiralal does not like the mattie. The hiralal denigrate the opaline. The hiralal yarn the opaline. The benji is empirical. The benji denigrate the hiralal. The benji denigrate the opaline. The benji yarn the opaline. The mattie restock the benji. The mattie does not need the hiralal. The opaline denigrate the mattie. If the hiralal is faultless then the hiralal restock the opaline. If something restock the opaline then the opaline yarn the hiralal. If the opaline yarn the hiralal and the hiralal denigrate the benji then the benji yarn the hiralal. If something yarn the mattie and the mattie is polymeric then the mattie yarn the benji. If something yarn the opaline and it does not need the benji then the opaline is not palmar. If something is faultless and not palmar then it is empirical. If the mattie is not empirical then the mattie is not tutelary. If the benji is empirical and the benji restock the mattie then the mattie is tutelary. The opaline does not need the hiralal.", "logic": "\nRestock(hiralal, benji)\nnot Restock(hiralal, mattie)\nPalmar(hiralal)\nFaultless(hiralal)\nDenigrate(hiralal, benji)\nnot Denigrate(hiralal, mattie)\nDenigrate(hiralal, opaline)\nYarn(hiralal, opaline)\nEmpirical(benji)\nDenigrate(benji, hiralal)\nDenigrate(benji, opaline)\nYarn(benji, opaline)\nRestock(mattie, benji)\nnot Yarn(mattie, hiralal)\nDenigrate(opaline, mattie)\nFaultless(hiralal) -> Restock(hiralal, opaline)\nforall x (Restock(x, opaline) -> Yarn(opaline, hiralal))\nYarn(opaline, hiralal) and Denigrate(hiralal, benji) -> Yarn(benji, hiralal)\nforall x (Yarn(x, mattie) and Polymeric(mattie) -> Yarn(mattie, benji))\nforall x (Yarn(x, opaline) and not Yarn(x, benji) -> not Palmar(opaline))\nforall x (Faultless(x) and not Palmar(x) -> Empirical(x))\nnot Empirical(mattie) -> not Tutelary(mattie)\nEmpirical(benji) and Restock(benji, mattie) -> Tutelary(mattie)\n\nnot Yarn(opaline, hiralal)\n\nFaultless(hiralal) and Faultless(hiralal) -> Restock(hiralal, opaline) -> therefore Restock(hiralal, opaline) Restock(hiralal, opaline) and forall x (Restock(x, opaline) -> Yarn(opaline, hiralal)) -> therefore Yarn(opaline, hiralal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The halli iodize the bamby. The halli does not chase the douggie. The halli is prismatic. The halli is refreshful. The halli fluctuate the bamby. The halli does not like the douggie. The halli fluctuate the dov. The halli honey the dov. The bamby is profitable. The bamby fluctuate the halli. The bamby fluctuate the dov. The bamby honey the dov. The douggie iodize the bamby. The douggie does not need the halli. The dov fluctuate the douggie. If the halli is refreshful then the halli iodize the dov. If something iodize the dov then the dov honey the halli. If the dov honey the halli and the halli fluctuate the bamby then the bamby honey the halli. If something honey the douggie and the douggie is maxi then the douggie honey the bamby. If something honey the dov and it does not need the bamby then the dov is not prismatic. If something is refreshful and not prismatic then it is profitable. If the douggie is not profitable then the douggie is not plutonic. If the bamby is profitable and the bamby iodize the douggie then the douggie is plutonic. The bamby honey the halli.", "logic": "\nIodize(halli, bamby)\nnot Iodize(halli, douggie)\nPrismatic(halli)\nRefreshful(halli)\nFluctuate(halli, bamby)\nnot Fluctuate(halli, douggie)\nFluctuate(halli, dov)\nHoney(halli, dov)\nProfitable(bamby)\nFluctuate(bamby, halli)\nFluctuate(bamby, dov)\nHoney(bamby, dov)\nIodize(douggie, bamby)\nnot Honey(douggie, halli)\nFluctuate(dov, douggie)\nRefreshful(halli) -> Iodize(halli, dov)\nforall x (Iodize(x, dov) -> Honey(dov, halli))\nHoney(dov, halli) and Fluctuate(halli, bamby) -> Honey(bamby, halli)\nforall x (Honey(x, douggie) and Maxi(douggie) -> Honey(douggie, bamby))\nforall x (Honey(x, dov) and not Honey(x, bamby) -> not Prismatic(dov))\nforall x (Refreshful(x) and not Prismatic(x) -> Profitable(x))\nnot Profitable(douggie) -> not Plutonic(douggie)\nProfitable(bamby) and Iodize(bamby, douggie) -> Plutonic(douggie)\n\nHoney(bamby, halli)\n\nRefreshful(halli) and Refreshful(halli) -> Iodize(halli, dov) -> therefore Iodize(halli, dov) Iodize(halli, dov) and forall x (Iodize(x, dov) -> Honey(dov, halli)) -> therefore Honey(dov, halli) Honey(dov, halli) and Fluctuate(halli, bamby) and Honey(dov, halli) and Fluctuate(halli, bamby) -> Honey(bamby, halli) -> therefore Honey(bamby, halli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The hilton vesicate the noble. The hilton does not chase the yoshiko. The hilton is animistic. The hilton is buckshee. The hilton carnify the noble. The hilton does not like the yoshiko. The hilton carnify the taylor. The hilton waver the taylor. The noble is eruptive. The noble carnify the hilton. The noble carnify the taylor. The noble waver the taylor. The yoshiko vesicate the noble. The yoshiko does not need the hilton. The taylor carnify the yoshiko. If the hilton is buckshee then the hilton vesicate the taylor. If something vesicate the taylor then the taylor waver the hilton. If the taylor waver the hilton and the hilton carnify the noble then the noble waver the hilton. If something waver the yoshiko and the yoshiko is surviving then the yoshiko waver the noble. If something waver the taylor and it does not need the noble then the taylor is not animistic. If something is buckshee and not animistic then it is eruptive. If the yoshiko is not eruptive then the yoshiko is not obvious. If the noble is eruptive and the noble vesicate the yoshiko then the yoshiko is obvious. The noble does not need the hilton.", "logic": "\nVesicate(hilton, noble)\nnot Vesicate(hilton, yoshiko)\nAnimistic(hilton)\nBuckshee(hilton)\nCarnify(hilton, noble)\nnot Carnify(hilton, yoshiko)\nCarnify(hilton, taylor)\nWaver(hilton, taylor)\nEruptive(noble)\nCarnify(noble, hilton)\nCarnify(noble, taylor)\nWaver(noble, taylor)\nVesicate(yoshiko, noble)\nnot Waver(yoshiko, hilton)\nCarnify(taylor, yoshiko)\nBuckshee(hilton) -> Vesicate(hilton, taylor)\nforall x (Vesicate(x, taylor) -> Waver(taylor, hilton))\nWaver(taylor, hilton) and Carnify(hilton, noble) -> Waver(noble, hilton)\nforall x (Waver(x, yoshiko) and Surviving(yoshiko) -> Waver(yoshiko, noble))\nforall x (Waver(x, taylor) and not Waver(x, noble) -> not Animistic(taylor))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and not Animistic(x) -> Eruptive(x))\nnot Eruptive(yoshiko) -> not Obvious(yoshiko)\nEruptive(noble) and Vesicate(noble, yoshiko) -> Obvious(yoshiko)\n\nnot Waver(noble, hilton)\n\nBuckshee(hilton) and Buckshee(hilton) -> Vesicate(hilton, taylor) -> therefore Vesicate(hilton, taylor) Vesicate(hilton, taylor) and forall x (Vesicate(x, taylor) -> Waver(taylor, hilton)) -> therefore Waver(taylor, hilton) Waver(taylor, hilton) and Carnify(hilton, noble) and Waver(taylor, hilton) and Carnify(hilton, noble) -> Waver(noble, hilton) -> therefore Waver(noble, hilton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The cordey maroon the henka. The cordey does not chase the star. The cordey is tittering. The cordey is abreast. The cordey localize the henka. The cordey does not like the star. The cordey localize the angelika. The cordey besmear the angelika. The henka is neotenous. The henka localize the cordey. The henka localize the angelika. The henka besmear the angelika. The star maroon the henka. The star does not need the cordey. The angelika localize the star. If the cordey is abreast then the cordey maroon the angelika. If something maroon the angelika then the angelika besmear the cordey. If the angelika besmear the cordey and the cordey localize the henka then the henka besmear the cordey. If something besmear the star and the star is giant then the star besmear the henka. If something besmear the angelika and it does not need the henka then the angelika is not tittering. If something is abreast and not tittering then it is neotenous. If the star is not neotenous then the star is not depictive. If the henka is neotenous and the henka maroon the star then the star is depictive. The star is not neotenous.", "logic": "\nMaroon(cordey, henka)\nnot Maroon(cordey, star)\nTittering(cordey)\nAbreast(cordey)\nLocalize(cordey, henka)\nnot Localize(cordey, star)\nLocalize(cordey, angelika)\nBesmear(cordey, angelika)\nNeotenous(henka)\nLocalize(henka, cordey)\nLocalize(henka, angelika)\nBesmear(henka, angelika)\nMaroon(star, henka)\nnot Besmear(star, cordey)\nLocalize(angelika, star)\nAbreast(cordey) -> Maroon(cordey, angelika)\nforall x (Maroon(x, angelika) -> Besmear(angelika, cordey))\nBesmear(angelika, cordey) and Localize(cordey, henka) -> Besmear(henka, cordey)\nforall x (Besmear(x, star) and Giant(star) -> Besmear(star, henka))\nforall x (Besmear(x, angelika) and not Besmear(x, henka) -> not Tittering(angelika))\nforall x (Abreast(x) and not Tittering(x) -> Neotenous(x))\nnot Neotenous(star) -> not Depictive(star)\nNeotenous(henka) and Maroon(henka, star) -> Depictive(star)\n\nnot Neotenous(star)\n\nforall x (Abreast(x) and not Tittering(x) -> Neotenous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The barbe realine the tim. The barbe does not chase the marlee. The barbe is immovable. The barbe is incurious. The barbe abrase the tim. The barbe does not like the marlee. The barbe abrase the tasia. The barbe horse the tasia. The tim is unredeemed. The tim abrase the barbe. The tim abrase the tasia. The tim horse the tasia. The marlee realine the tim. The marlee does not need the barbe. The tasia abrase the marlee. If the barbe is incurious then the barbe realine the tasia. If something realine the tasia then the tasia horse the barbe. If the tasia horse the barbe and the barbe abrase the tim then the tim horse the barbe. If something horse the marlee and the marlee is negotiable then the marlee horse the tim. If something horse the tasia and it does not need the tim then the tasia is not immovable. If something is incurious and not immovable then it is unredeemed. If the marlee is not unredeemed then the marlee is not purgative. If the tim is unredeemed and the tim realine the marlee then the marlee is purgative. The barbe is unredeemed.", "logic": "\nRealine(barbe, tim)\nnot Realine(barbe, marlee)\nImmovable(barbe)\nIncurious(barbe)\nAbrase(barbe, tim)\nnot Abrase(barbe, marlee)\nAbrase(barbe, tasia)\nHorse(barbe, tasia)\nUnredeemed(tim)\nAbrase(tim, barbe)\nAbrase(tim, tasia)\nHorse(tim, tasia)\nRealine(marlee, tim)\nnot Horse(marlee, barbe)\nAbrase(tasia, marlee)\nIncurious(barbe) -> Realine(barbe, tasia)\nforall x (Realine(x, tasia) -> Horse(tasia, barbe))\nHorse(tasia, barbe) and Abrase(barbe, tim) -> Horse(tim, barbe)\nforall x (Horse(x, marlee) and Negotiable(marlee) -> Horse(marlee, tim))\nforall x (Horse(x, tasia) and not Horse(x, tim) -> not Immovable(tasia))\nforall x (Incurious(x) and not Immovable(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nnot Unredeemed(marlee) -> not Purgative(marlee)\nUnredeemed(tim) and Realine(tim, marlee) -> Purgative(marlee)\n\nUnredeemed(barbe)\n\nforall x (Incurious(x) and not Immovable(x) -> Unredeemed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The park buffet the athena. The park does not chase the cris. The park is mosstone. The park is thawed. The park remind the athena. The park does not like the cris. The park remind the connolly. The park microwave the connolly. The athena is prewar. The athena remind the park. The athena remind the connolly. The athena microwave the connolly. The cris buffet the athena. The cris does not need the park. The connolly remind the cris. If the park is thawed then the park buffet the connolly. If something buffet the connolly then the connolly microwave the park. If the connolly microwave the park and the park remind the athena then the athena microwave the park. If something microwave the cris and the cris is rotatable then the cris microwave the athena. If something microwave the connolly and it does not need the athena then the connolly is not mosstone. If something is thawed and not mosstone then it is prewar. If the cris is not prewar then the cris is not muciferous. If the athena is prewar and the athena buffet the cris then the cris is muciferous. The connolly is not prewar.", "logic": "\nBuffet(park, athena)\nnot Buffet(park, cris)\nMosstone(park)\nThawed(park)\nRemind(park, athena)\nnot Remind(park, cris)\nRemind(park, connolly)\nMicrowave(park, connolly)\nPrewar(athena)\nRemind(athena, park)\nRemind(athena, connolly)\nMicrowave(athena, connolly)\nBuffet(cris, athena)\nnot Microwave(cris, park)\nRemind(connolly, cris)\nThawed(park) -> Buffet(park, connolly)\nforall x (Buffet(x, connolly) -> Microwave(connolly, park))\nMicrowave(connolly, park) and Remind(park, athena) -> Microwave(athena, park)\nforall x (Microwave(x, cris) and Rotatable(cris) -> Microwave(cris, athena))\nforall x (Microwave(x, connolly) and not Microwave(x, athena) -> not Mosstone(connolly))\nforall x (Thawed(x) and not Mosstone(x) -> Prewar(x))\nnot Prewar(cris) -> not Muciferous(cris)\nPrewar(athena) and Buffet(athena, cris) -> Muciferous(cris)\n\nnot Prewar(connolly)\n\nforall x (Thawed(x) and not Mosstone(x) -> Prewar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The clara lust the wilfrid. The clara does not chase the finn. The clara is embryotic. The clara is ursine. The clara trample the wilfrid. The clara does not like the finn. The clara trample the genevieve. The clara caramelise the genevieve. The wilfrid is contrary. The wilfrid trample the clara. The wilfrid trample the genevieve. The wilfrid caramelise the genevieve. The finn lust the wilfrid. The finn does not need the clara. The genevieve trample the finn. If the clara is ursine then the clara lust the genevieve. If something lust the genevieve then the genevieve caramelise the clara. If the genevieve caramelise the clara and the clara trample the wilfrid then the wilfrid caramelise the clara. If something caramelise the finn and the finn is dialectal then the finn caramelise the wilfrid. If something caramelise the genevieve and it does not need the wilfrid then the genevieve is not embryotic. If something is ursine and not embryotic then it is contrary. If the finn is not contrary then the finn is not rumbling. If the wilfrid is contrary and the wilfrid lust the finn then the finn is rumbling. The finn is rumbling.", "logic": "\nLust(clara, wilfrid)\nnot Lust(clara, finn)\nEmbryotic(clara)\nUrsine(clara)\nTrample(clara, wilfrid)\nnot Trample(clara, finn)\nTrample(clara, genevieve)\nCaramelise(clara, genevieve)\nContrary(wilfrid)\nTrample(wilfrid, clara)\nTrample(wilfrid, genevieve)\nCaramelise(wilfrid, genevieve)\nLust(finn, wilfrid)\nnot Caramelise(finn, clara)\nTrample(genevieve, finn)\nUrsine(clara) -> Lust(clara, genevieve)\nforall x (Lust(x, genevieve) -> Caramelise(genevieve, clara))\nCaramelise(genevieve, clara) and Trample(clara, wilfrid) -> Caramelise(wilfrid, clara)\nforall x (Caramelise(x, finn) and Dialectal(finn) -> Caramelise(finn, wilfrid))\nforall x (Caramelise(x, genevieve) and not Caramelise(x, wilfrid) -> not Embryotic(genevieve))\nforall x (Ursine(x) and not Embryotic(x) -> Contrary(x))\nnot Contrary(finn) -> not Rumbling(finn)\nContrary(wilfrid) and Lust(wilfrid, finn) -> Rumbling(finn)\n\nRumbling(finn)\n\nContrary(wilfrid) and Lust(wilfrid, finn) -> Rumbling(finn) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The haskel convene the daryle. The haskel does not chase the aubrey. The haskel is solemn. The haskel is speckless. The haskel calculate the daryle. The haskel does not like the aubrey. The haskel calculate the cybel. The haskel devaluate the cybel. The daryle is pyknic. The daryle calculate the haskel. The daryle calculate the cybel. The daryle devaluate the cybel. The aubrey convene the daryle. The aubrey does not need the haskel. The cybel calculate the aubrey. If the haskel is speckless then the haskel convene the cybel. If something convene the cybel then the cybel devaluate the haskel. If the cybel devaluate the haskel and the haskel calculate the daryle then the daryle devaluate the haskel. If something devaluate the aubrey and the aubrey is dear then the aubrey devaluate the daryle. If something devaluate the cybel and it does not need the daryle then the cybel is not solemn. If something is speckless and not solemn then it is pyknic. If the aubrey is not pyknic then the aubrey is not bland. If the daryle is pyknic and the daryle convene the aubrey then the aubrey is bland. The cybel does not need the cybel.", "logic": "\nConvene(haskel, daryle)\nnot Convene(haskel, aubrey)\nSolemn(haskel)\nSpeckless(haskel)\nCalculate(haskel, daryle)\nnot Calculate(haskel, aubrey)\nCalculate(haskel, cybel)\nDevaluate(haskel, cybel)\nPyknic(daryle)\nCalculate(daryle, haskel)\nCalculate(daryle, cybel)\nDevaluate(daryle, cybel)\nConvene(aubrey, daryle)\nnot Devaluate(aubrey, haskel)\nCalculate(cybel, aubrey)\nSpeckless(haskel) -> Convene(haskel, cybel)\nforall x (Convene(x, cybel) -> Devaluate(cybel, haskel))\nDevaluate(cybel, haskel) and Calculate(haskel, daryle) -> Devaluate(daryle, haskel)\nforall x (Devaluate(x, aubrey) and Dear(aubrey) -> Devaluate(aubrey, daryle))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, cybel) and not Devaluate(x, daryle) -> not Solemn(cybel))\nforall x (Speckless(x) and not Solemn(x) -> Pyknic(x))\nnot Pyknic(aubrey) -> not Bland(aubrey)\nPyknic(daryle) and Convene(daryle, aubrey) -> Bland(aubrey)\n\nnot Devaluate(cybel, cybel)\n\nnot Devaluate(cybel, cybel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The tawnya criticise the lockwood. The tawnya does not chase the janot. The tawnya is acceptive. The tawnya is nurturant. The tawnya blame the lockwood. The tawnya does not like the janot. The tawnya blame the pat. The tawnya chagrin the pat. The lockwood is chinked. The lockwood blame the tawnya. The lockwood blame the pat. The lockwood chagrin the pat. The janot criticise the lockwood. The janot does not need the tawnya. The pat blame the janot. If the tawnya is nurturant then the tawnya criticise the pat. If something criticise the pat then the pat chagrin the tawnya. If the pat chagrin the tawnya and the tawnya blame the lockwood then the lockwood chagrin the tawnya. If something chagrin the janot and the janot is seeded then the janot chagrin the lockwood. If something chagrin the pat and it does not need the lockwood then the pat is not acceptive. If something is nurturant and not acceptive then it is chinked. If the janot is not chinked then the janot is not chichi. If the lockwood is chinked and the lockwood criticise the janot then the janot is chichi. The tawnya blame the tawnya.", "logic": "\nCriticise(tawnya, lockwood)\nnot Criticise(tawnya, janot)\nAcceptive(tawnya)\nNurturant(tawnya)\nBlame(tawnya, lockwood)\nnot Blame(tawnya, janot)\nBlame(tawnya, pat)\nChagrin(tawnya, pat)\nChinked(lockwood)\nBlame(lockwood, tawnya)\nBlame(lockwood, pat)\nChagrin(lockwood, pat)\nCriticise(janot, lockwood)\nnot Chagrin(janot, tawnya)\nBlame(pat, janot)\nNurturant(tawnya) -> Criticise(tawnya, pat)\nforall x (Criticise(x, pat) -> Chagrin(pat, tawnya))\nChagrin(pat, tawnya) and Blame(tawnya, lockwood) -> Chagrin(lockwood, tawnya)\nforall x (Chagrin(x, janot) and Seeded(janot) -> Chagrin(janot, lockwood))\nforall x (Chagrin(x, pat) and not Chagrin(x, lockwood) -> not Acceptive(pat))\nforall x (Nurturant(x) and not Acceptive(x) -> Chinked(x))\nnot Chinked(janot) -> not Chichi(janot)\nChinked(lockwood) and Criticise(lockwood, janot) -> Chichi(janot)\n\nBlame(tawnya, tawnya)\n\nBlame(tawnya, tawnya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The mufinella clog the hiralal. The mufinella does not chase the eilis. The mufinella is sacculate. The mufinella is storied. The mufinella encrypt the hiralal. The mufinella does not like the eilis. The mufinella encrypt the vick. The mufinella deafen the vick. The hiralal is overgreedy. The hiralal encrypt the mufinella. The hiralal encrypt the vick. The hiralal deafen the vick. The eilis clog the hiralal. The eilis does not need the mufinella. The vick encrypt the eilis. If the mufinella is storied then the mufinella clog the vick. If something clog the vick then the vick deafen the mufinella. If the vick deafen the mufinella and the mufinella encrypt the hiralal then the hiralal deafen the mufinella. If something deafen the eilis and the eilis is solemn then the eilis deafen the hiralal. If something deafen the vick and it does not need the hiralal then the vick is not sacculate. If something is storied and not sacculate then it is overgreedy. If the eilis is not overgreedy then the eilis is not repugnant. If the hiralal is overgreedy and the hiralal clog the eilis then the eilis is repugnant. The hiralal does not like the hiralal.", "logic": "\nClog(mufinella, hiralal)\nnot Clog(mufinella, eilis)\nSacculate(mufinella)\nStoried(mufinella)\nEncrypt(mufinella, hiralal)\nnot Encrypt(mufinella, eilis)\nEncrypt(mufinella, vick)\nDeafen(mufinella, vick)\nOvergreedy(hiralal)\nEncrypt(hiralal, mufinella)\nEncrypt(hiralal, vick)\nDeafen(hiralal, vick)\nClog(eilis, hiralal)\nnot Deafen(eilis, mufinella)\nEncrypt(vick, eilis)\nStoried(mufinella) -> Clog(mufinella, vick)\nforall x (Clog(x, vick) -> Deafen(vick, mufinella))\nDeafen(vick, mufinella) and Encrypt(mufinella, hiralal) -> Deafen(hiralal, mufinella)\nforall x (Deafen(x, eilis) and Solemn(eilis) -> Deafen(eilis, hiralal))\nforall x (Deafen(x, vick) and not Deafen(x, hiralal) -> not Sacculate(vick))\nforall x (Storied(x) and not Sacculate(x) -> Overgreedy(x))\nnot Overgreedy(eilis) -> not Repugnant(eilis)\nOvergreedy(hiralal) and Clog(hiralal, eilis) -> Repugnant(eilis)\n\nnot Encrypt(hiralal, hiralal)\n\nnot Encrypt(hiralal, hiralal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The vittoria leash the aldis. The vittoria does not chase the allan. The vittoria is poignant. The vittoria is broken. The vittoria compound the aldis. The vittoria does not like the allan. The vittoria compound the carmon. The vittoria interview the carmon. The aldis is refractile. The aldis compound the vittoria. The aldis compound the carmon. The aldis interview the carmon. The allan leash the aldis. The allan does not need the vittoria. The carmon compound the allan. If the vittoria is broken then the vittoria leash the carmon. If something leash the carmon then the carmon interview the vittoria. If the carmon interview the vittoria and the vittoria compound the aldis then the aldis interview the vittoria. If something interview the allan and the allan is accrued then the allan interview the aldis. If something interview the carmon and it does not need the aldis then the carmon is not poignant. If something is broken and not poignant then it is refractile. If the allan is not refractile then the allan is not keyed. If the aldis is refractile and the aldis leash the allan then the allan is keyed. The allan compound the carmon.", "logic": "\nLeash(vittoria, aldis)\nnot Leash(vittoria, allan)\nPoignant(vittoria)\nBroken(vittoria)\nCompound(vittoria, aldis)\nnot Compound(vittoria, allan)\nCompound(vittoria, carmon)\nInterview(vittoria, carmon)\nRefractile(aldis)\nCompound(aldis, vittoria)\nCompound(aldis, carmon)\nInterview(aldis, carmon)\nLeash(allan, aldis)\nnot Interview(allan, vittoria)\nCompound(carmon, allan)\nBroken(vittoria) -> Leash(vittoria, carmon)\nforall x (Leash(x, carmon) -> Interview(carmon, vittoria))\nInterview(carmon, vittoria) and Compound(vittoria, aldis) -> Interview(aldis, vittoria)\nforall x (Interview(x, allan) and Accrued(allan) -> Interview(allan, aldis))\nforall x (Interview(x, carmon) and not Interview(x, aldis) -> not Poignant(carmon))\nforall x (Broken(x) and not Poignant(x) -> Refractile(x))\nnot Refractile(allan) -> not Keyed(allan)\nRefractile(aldis) and Leash(aldis, allan) -> Keyed(allan)\n\nCompound(allan, carmon)\n\nCompound(allan, carmon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-191"} {"premises": "The mahalia rave the moshe. The moshe does not like the mahalia. If someone rave the moshe and they see the mahalia then the mahalia does not like the moshe. If someone is rare and nubby then they are bedded. If the moshe rave the mahalia then the mahalia refresh the moshe. If someone refresh the moshe then the moshe is nubby. If someone flaw the mahalia and they see the moshe then the moshe is sparing. If someone is nubby then they like the mahalia. The moshe does not like the mahalia.", "logic": "\nRave(mahalia, moshe)\nnot Rave(moshe, mahalia)\nforall x (Rave(x, moshe) and Refresh(x, mahalia) -> not Rave(mahalia, moshe))\nforall x (Rare(x) and Nubby(x) -> Bedded(x))\nRave(moshe, mahalia) -> Refresh(mahalia, moshe)\nforall x (Refresh(x, moshe) -> Nubby(moshe))\nforall x (Flaw(x, mahalia) and Refresh(x, moshe) -> Sparing(moshe))\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Rave(x, mahalia))\n\nnot Rave(moshe, mahalia)\n\ntherefore not Rave(moshe, mahalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4215"} {"premises": "The roarke offend the brendan. The brendan does not like the roarke. If someone offend the brendan and they see the roarke then the roarke does not like the brendan. If someone is ungrudging and blindfold then they are octagonal. If the brendan offend the roarke then the roarke poetize the brendan. If someone poetize the brendan then the brendan is blindfold. If someone bias the roarke and they see the brendan then the brendan is opened. If someone is blindfold then they like the roarke. The roarke does not like the brendan.", "logic": "\nOffend(roarke, brendan)\nnot Offend(brendan, roarke)\nforall x (Offend(x, brendan) and Poetize(x, roarke) -> not Offend(roarke, brendan))\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) and Blindfold(x) -> Octagonal(x))\nOffend(brendan, roarke) -> Poetize(roarke, brendan)\nforall x (Poetize(x, brendan) -> Blindfold(brendan))\nforall x (Bias(x, roarke) and Poetize(x, brendan) -> Opened(brendan))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) -> Offend(x, roarke))\n\nnot Offend(roarke, brendan)\n\ntherefore Offend(roarke, brendan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4215"} {"premises": "The elita exfoliate the becca. The becca does not like the elita. If someone exfoliate the becca and they see the elita then the elita does not like the becca. If someone is energizing and easygoing then they are bilateral. If the becca exfoliate the elita then the elita undergo the becca. If someone undergo the becca then the becca is easygoing. If someone latinise the elita and they see the becca then the becca is bestubbled. If someone is easygoing then they like the elita. The becca is not bestubbled.", "logic": "\nExfoliate(elita, becca)\nnot Exfoliate(becca, elita)\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, becca) and Undergo(x, elita) -> not Exfoliate(elita, becca))\nforall x (Energizing(x) and Easygoing(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nExfoliate(becca, elita) -> Undergo(elita, becca)\nforall x (Undergo(x, becca) -> Easygoing(becca))\nforall x (Latinise(x, elita) and Undergo(x, becca) -> Bestubbled(becca))\nforall x (Easygoing(x) -> Exfoliate(x, elita))\n\nnot Bestubbled(becca)\n\nforall x (Latinise(x, elita) and Undergo(x, becca) -> Bestubbled(becca)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4215"} {"premises": "The theada bill the fidel. The fidel does not like the theada. If someone bill the fidel and they see the theada then the theada does not like the fidel. If someone is diazo and ecstatic then they are hardcore. If the fidel bill the theada then the theada join the fidel. If someone join the fidel then the fidel is ecstatic. If someone nick the theada and they see the fidel then the fidel is vapourous. If someone is ecstatic then they like the theada. The fidel join the theada.", "logic": "\nBill(theada, fidel)\nnot Bill(fidel, theada)\nforall x (Bill(x, fidel) and Join(x, theada) -> not Bill(theada, fidel))\nforall x (Diazo(x) and Ecstatic(x) -> Hardcore(x))\nBill(fidel, theada) -> Join(theada, fidel)\nforall x (Join(x, fidel) -> Ecstatic(fidel))\nforall x (Nick(x, theada) and Join(x, fidel) -> Vapourous(fidel))\nforall x (Ecstatic(x) -> Bill(x, theada))\n\nJoin(fidel, theada)\n\nJoin(fidel, theada) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4215"} {"premises": "Johan is israeli. Johan is moblike. Johan is mortified. Johan is spooky. Johan is clanging. Rosetta is palmate. Rosetta is moblike. Rosetta is mortified. Rosetta is clanging. Rosetta is spent. Joann is palmate. Joann is israeli. Joann is moblike. Joann is spooky. Joann is clanging. Joann is spent. Blue, spent things are clanging. If something is clanging and moblike then it is spent. Rosetta is spent.", "logic": "\nIsraeli(johan)\nMoblike(johan)\nMortified(johan)\nSpooky(johan)\nClanging(johan)\nPalmate(rosetta)\nMoblike(rosetta)\nMortified(rosetta)\nClanging(rosetta)\nSpent(rosetta)\nPalmate(joann)\nIsraeli(joann)\nMoblike(joann)\nSpooky(joann)\nClanging(joann)\nSpent(joann)\nforall x (Israeli(x) and Spent(x) -> Clanging(x))\nforall x (Clanging(x) and Moblike(x) -> Spent(x))\n\nSpent(rosetta)\n\ntherefore Spent(rosetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Mordecai is microbial. Mordecai is cubistic. Mordecai is ponderable. Mordecai is anuric. Mordecai is rootbound. Dedie is gray. Dedie is cubistic. Dedie is ponderable. Dedie is rootbound. Dedie is operose. Taddeus is gray. Taddeus is microbial. Taddeus is cubistic. Taddeus is anuric. Taddeus is rootbound. Taddeus is operose. Blue, operose things are rootbound. If something is rootbound and cubistic then it is operose. Mordecai is not cubistic.", "logic": "\nMicrobial(mordecai)\nCubistic(mordecai)\nPonderable(mordecai)\nAnuric(mordecai)\nRootbound(mordecai)\nGray(dedie)\nCubistic(dedie)\nPonderable(dedie)\nRootbound(dedie)\nOperose(dedie)\nGray(taddeus)\nMicrobial(taddeus)\nCubistic(taddeus)\nAnuric(taddeus)\nRootbound(taddeus)\nOperose(taddeus)\nforall x (Microbial(x) and Operose(x) -> Rootbound(x))\nforall x (Rootbound(x) and Cubistic(x) -> Operose(x))\n\nnot Cubistic(mordecai)\n\ntherefore Cubistic(mordecai)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Renaud is flecked. Renaud is mutable. Renaud is venezuelan. Renaud is obtuse. Renaud is clockwise. Maude is assessable. Maude is mutable. Maude is venezuelan. Maude is clockwise. Maude is cataphatic. Reta is assessable. Reta is flecked. Reta is mutable. Reta is obtuse. Reta is clockwise. Reta is cataphatic. Blue, cataphatic things are clockwise. If something is clockwise and mutable then it is cataphatic. Renaud is cataphatic.", "logic": "\nFlecked(renaud)\nMutable(renaud)\nVenezuelan(renaud)\nObtuse(renaud)\nClockwise(renaud)\nAssessable(maude)\nMutable(maude)\nVenezuelan(maude)\nClockwise(maude)\nCataphatic(maude)\nAssessable(reta)\nFlecked(reta)\nMutable(reta)\nObtuse(reta)\nClockwise(reta)\nCataphatic(reta)\nforall x (Flecked(x) and Cataphatic(x) -> Clockwise(x))\nforall x (Clockwise(x) and Mutable(x) -> Cataphatic(x))\n\nCataphatic(renaud)\n\nClockwise(renaud) and Mutable(renaud) and forall x (Clockwise(x) and Mutable(x) -> Cataphatic(x)) -> therefore Cataphatic(renaud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Torin is coherent. Torin is illative. Torin is humoral. Torin is indigenous. Torin is bivalved. Willamina is dexter. Willamina is illative. Willamina is humoral. Willamina is bivalved. Willamina is monodical. Remus is dexter. Remus is coherent. Remus is illative. Remus is indigenous. Remus is bivalved. Remus is monodical. Blue, monodical things are bivalved. If something is bivalved and illative then it is monodical. Torin is not monodical.", "logic": "\nCoherent(torin)\nIllative(torin)\nHumoral(torin)\nIndigenous(torin)\nBivalved(torin)\nDexter(willamina)\nIllative(willamina)\nHumoral(willamina)\nBivalved(willamina)\nMonodical(willamina)\nDexter(remus)\nCoherent(remus)\nIllative(remus)\nIndigenous(remus)\nBivalved(remus)\nMonodical(remus)\nforall x (Coherent(x) and Monodical(x) -> Bivalved(x))\nforall x (Bivalved(x) and Illative(x) -> Monodical(x))\n\nnot Monodical(torin)\n\nBivalved(torin) and Illative(torin) and forall x (Bivalved(x) and Illative(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(torin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Vinita is sheeplike. Vinita is aery. Vinita is oxidizable. Vinita is aslope. Vinita is eroded. Annice is clastic. Annice is aery. Annice is oxidizable. Annice is eroded. Annice is mitigative. Jedediah is clastic. Jedediah is sheeplike. Jedediah is aery. Jedediah is aslope. Jedediah is eroded. Jedediah is mitigative. Blue, mitigative things are eroded. If something is eroded and aery then it is mitigative. Vinita is not clastic.", "logic": "\nSheeplike(vinita)\nAery(vinita)\nOxidizable(vinita)\nAslope(vinita)\nEroded(vinita)\nClastic(annice)\nAery(annice)\nOxidizable(annice)\nEroded(annice)\nMitigative(annice)\nClastic(jedediah)\nSheeplike(jedediah)\nAery(jedediah)\nAslope(jedediah)\nEroded(jedediah)\nMitigative(jedediah)\nforall x (Sheeplike(x) and Mitigative(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Eroded(x) and Aery(x) -> Mitigative(x))\n\nnot Clastic(vinita)\n\nnot Clastic(vinita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Devinne is drudging. Devinne is backswept. Devinne is hassidic. Devinne is inviolable. Devinne is unrelated. Tarrance is bonnie. Tarrance is backswept. Tarrance is hassidic. Tarrance is unrelated. Tarrance is bullnecked. Guendolen is bonnie. Guendolen is drudging. Guendolen is backswept. Guendolen is inviolable. Guendolen is unrelated. Guendolen is bullnecked. Blue, bullnecked things are unrelated. If something is unrelated and backswept then it is bullnecked. Tarrance is drudging.", "logic": "\nDrudging(devinne)\nBackswept(devinne)\nHassidic(devinne)\nInviolable(devinne)\nUnrelated(devinne)\nBonnie(tarrance)\nBackswept(tarrance)\nHassidic(tarrance)\nUnrelated(tarrance)\nBullnecked(tarrance)\nBonnie(guendolen)\nDrudging(guendolen)\nBackswept(guendolen)\nInviolable(guendolen)\nUnrelated(guendolen)\nBullnecked(guendolen)\nforall x (Drudging(x) and Bullnecked(x) -> Unrelated(x))\nforall x (Unrelated(x) and Backswept(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\n\nDrudging(tarrance)\n\nDrudging(tarrance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Windy is etiologic. Windy is assistant. Windy is uxorial. Windy is alkylic. Windy is apposite. Tori is baccate. Tori is assistant. Tori is uxorial. Tori is apposite. Tori is insoluble. Thorn is baccate. Thorn is etiologic. Thorn is assistant. Thorn is alkylic. Thorn is apposite. Thorn is insoluble. Blue, insoluble things are apposite. If something is apposite and assistant then it is insoluble. Tori is not alkylic.", "logic": "\nEtiologic(windy)\nAssistant(windy)\nUxorial(windy)\nAlkylic(windy)\nApposite(windy)\nBaccate(tori)\nAssistant(tori)\nUxorial(tori)\nApposite(tori)\nInsoluble(tori)\nBaccate(thorn)\nEtiologic(thorn)\nAssistant(thorn)\nAlkylic(thorn)\nApposite(thorn)\nInsoluble(thorn)\nforall x (Etiologic(x) and Insoluble(x) -> Apposite(x))\nforall x (Apposite(x) and Assistant(x) -> Insoluble(x))\n\nnot Alkylic(tori)\n\nnot Alkylic(tori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Andrey is palmlike. Andrey is clustered. Andrey is quirky. Andrey is spick. Andrey is valid. Justis is taiwanese. Justis is clustered. Justis is quirky. Justis is valid. Justis is dreamlike. Corina is taiwanese. Corina is palmlike. Corina is clustered. Corina is spick. Corina is valid. Corina is dreamlike. Blue, dreamlike things are valid. If something is valid and clustered then it is dreamlike. Corina is quirky.", "logic": "\nPalmlike(andrey)\nClustered(andrey)\nQuirky(andrey)\nSpick(andrey)\nValid(andrey)\nTaiwanese(justis)\nClustered(justis)\nQuirky(justis)\nValid(justis)\nDreamlike(justis)\nTaiwanese(corina)\nPalmlike(corina)\nClustered(corina)\nSpick(corina)\nValid(corina)\nDreamlike(corina)\nforall x (Palmlike(x) and Dreamlike(x) -> Valid(x))\nforall x (Valid(x) and Clustered(x) -> Dreamlike(x))\n\nQuirky(corina)\n\nQuirky(corina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-271"} {"premises": "Allianora is busty. Allianora is not spiritless. Allianora is nodulated. Allianora is prepupal. Len is busty. Len is ireful. Len is sepaloid. Len is nodulated. Len is public. Len is prepupal. All ireful people are sepaloid. If Allianora is nodulated then Allianora is ireful. Len is nodulated.", "logic": "\nBusty(allianora)\nnot Spiritless(allianora)\nNodulated(allianora)\nPrepupal(allianora)\nBusty(len)\nIreful(len)\nSepaloid(len)\nNodulated(len)\nPublic(len)\nPrepupal(len)\nforall x (Ireful(x) -> Sepaloid(x))\nNodulated(allianora) -> Ireful(allianora)\n\nNodulated(len)\n\ntherefore Nodulated(len)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Amos is pinstriped. Amos is not threefold. Amos is collect. Amos is flyspeck. Vaclav is pinstriped. Vaclav is paschal. Vaclav is bigmouthed. Vaclav is collect. Vaclav is fewer. Vaclav is flyspeck. All paschal people are bigmouthed. If Amos is collect then Amos is paschal. Amos is not flyspeck.", "logic": "\nPinstriped(amos)\nnot Threefold(amos)\nCollect(amos)\nFlyspeck(amos)\nPinstriped(vaclav)\nPaschal(vaclav)\nBigmouthed(vaclav)\nCollect(vaclav)\nFewer(vaclav)\nFlyspeck(vaclav)\nforall x (Paschal(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nCollect(amos) -> Paschal(amos)\n\nnot Flyspeck(amos)\n\ntherefore Flyspeck(amos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Dominick is malapropos. Dominick is not pebbly. Dominick is calamitous. Dominick is immutable. Kraig is malapropos. Kraig is tenderized. Kraig is semipublic. Kraig is calamitous. Kraig is haggard. Kraig is immutable. All tenderized people are semipublic. If Dominick is calamitous then Dominick is tenderized. Dominick is tenderized.", "logic": "\nMalapropos(dominick)\nnot Pebbly(dominick)\nCalamitous(dominick)\nImmutable(dominick)\nMalapropos(kraig)\nTenderized(kraig)\nSemipublic(kraig)\nCalamitous(kraig)\nHaggard(kraig)\nImmutable(kraig)\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> Semipublic(x))\nCalamitous(dominick) -> Tenderized(dominick)\n\nTenderized(dominick)\n\nCalamitous(dominick) and Calamitous(dominick) -> Tenderized(dominick) -> therefore Tenderized(dominick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Charlotte is dural. Charlotte is not genteel. Charlotte is saxatile. Charlotte is antennal. Horacio is dural. Horacio is churchly. Horacio is eightpenny. Horacio is saxatile. Horacio is presumable. Horacio is antennal. All churchly people are eightpenny. If Charlotte is saxatile then Charlotte is churchly. Charlotte is not churchly.", "logic": "\nDural(charlotte)\nnot Genteel(charlotte)\nSaxatile(charlotte)\nAntennal(charlotte)\nDural(horacio)\nChurchly(horacio)\nEightpenny(horacio)\nSaxatile(horacio)\nPresumable(horacio)\nAntennal(horacio)\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Eightpenny(x))\nSaxatile(charlotte) -> Churchly(charlotte)\n\nnot Churchly(charlotte)\n\nSaxatile(charlotte) and Saxatile(charlotte) -> Churchly(charlotte) -> therefore Churchly(charlotte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Aviva is dewy. Aviva is not beechen. Aviva is spunky. Aviva is fiscal. Clarine is dewy. Clarine is foregone. Clarine is parisian. Clarine is spunky. Clarine is unnumbered. Clarine is fiscal. All foregone people are parisian. If Aviva is spunky then Aviva is foregone. Aviva is parisian.", "logic": "\nDewy(aviva)\nnot Beechen(aviva)\nSpunky(aviva)\nFiscal(aviva)\nDewy(clarine)\nForegone(clarine)\nParisian(clarine)\nSpunky(clarine)\nUnnumbered(clarine)\nFiscal(clarine)\nforall x (Foregone(x) -> Parisian(x))\nSpunky(aviva) -> Foregone(aviva)\n\nParisian(aviva)\n\nSpunky(aviva) and Spunky(aviva) -> Foregone(aviva) -> therefore Foregone(aviva) Foregone(aviva) and forall x (Foregone(x) -> Parisian(x)) -> therefore Parisian(aviva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Darcie is invading. Darcie is not nigerien. Darcie is sericeous. Darcie is forfeited. Madelyn is invading. Madelyn is undesired. Madelyn is hispanic. Madelyn is sericeous. Madelyn is eviscerate. Madelyn is forfeited. All undesired people are hispanic. If Darcie is sericeous then Darcie is undesired. Darcie is not hispanic.", "logic": "\nInvading(darcie)\nnot Nigerien(darcie)\nSericeous(darcie)\nForfeited(darcie)\nInvading(madelyn)\nUndesired(madelyn)\nHispanic(madelyn)\nSericeous(madelyn)\nEviscerate(madelyn)\nForfeited(madelyn)\nforall x (Undesired(x) -> Hispanic(x))\nSericeous(darcie) -> Undesired(darcie)\n\nnot Hispanic(darcie)\n\nSericeous(darcie) and Sericeous(darcie) -> Undesired(darcie) -> therefore Undesired(darcie) Undesired(darcie) and forall x (Undesired(x) -> Hispanic(x)) -> therefore Hispanic(darcie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Nari is flowery. Nari is not diarrhoeic. Nari is checked. Nari is bipinnate. Hesther is flowery. Hesther is uvular. Hesther is snug. Hesther is checked. Hesther is melting. Hesther is bipinnate. All uvular people are snug. If Nari is checked then Nari is uvular. Nari is not melting.", "logic": "\nFlowery(nari)\nnot Diarrhoeic(nari)\nChecked(nari)\nBipinnate(nari)\nFlowery(hesther)\nUvular(hesther)\nSnug(hesther)\nChecked(hesther)\nMelting(hesther)\nBipinnate(hesther)\nforall x (Uvular(x) -> Snug(x))\nChecked(nari) -> Uvular(nari)\n\nnot Melting(nari)\n\nnot Melting(nari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "Glad is narcotised. Glad is not bigger. Glad is sanguinary. Glad is unsparing. Koo is narcotised. Koo is prone. Koo is anglican. Koo is sanguinary. Koo is wheeled. Koo is unsparing. All prone people are anglican. If Glad is sanguinary then Glad is prone. Koo is bigger.", "logic": "\nNarcotised(glad)\nnot Bigger(glad)\nSanguinary(glad)\nUnsparing(glad)\nNarcotised(koo)\nProne(koo)\nAnglican(koo)\nSanguinary(koo)\nWheeled(koo)\nUnsparing(koo)\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Anglican(x))\nSanguinary(glad) -> Prone(glad)\n\nBigger(koo)\n\nBigger(koo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-267"} {"premises": "The levon esterify the corette. The corette is indexless. The hazel is not prognostic. The zandra esterify the hazel. If something is calculous and it spearhead the zandra then it esterify the hazel. If something spearhead the hazel and it does not need the levon then it spearhead the levon. If something spearhead the corette then it is cellulosid. If the zandra thumbtack the levon then the levon spearhead the hazel. If something esterify the corette then it spearhead the corette. If something is cellulosid then it is indexless. The levon esterify the corette.", "logic": "\nEsterify(levon, corette)\nIndexless(corette)\nnot Prognostic(hazel)\nEsterify(zandra, hazel)\nforall x (Calculous(x) and Spearhead(x, zandra) -> Esterify(x, hazel))\nforall x (Spearhead(x, hazel) and not Esterify(x, levon) -> Spearhead(x, levon))\nforall x (Spearhead(x, corette) -> Cellulosid(x))\nThumbtack(zandra, levon) -> Spearhead(levon, hazel)\nforall x (Esterify(x, corette) -> Spearhead(x, corette))\nforall x (Cellulosid(x) -> Indexless(x))\n\nEsterify(levon, corette)\n\ntherefore Esterify(levon, corette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The homer author the lloyd. The lloyd is delphian. The claudia is not dedicated. The cherilyn author the claudia. If something is dovish and it undrape the cherilyn then it author the claudia. If something undrape the claudia and it does not need the homer then it undrape the homer. If something undrape the lloyd then it is zambian. If the cherilyn inaugurate the homer then the homer undrape the claudia. If something author the lloyd then it undrape the lloyd. If something is zambian then it is delphian. The lloyd is not delphian.", "logic": "\nAuthor(homer, lloyd)\nDelphian(lloyd)\nnot Dedicated(claudia)\nAuthor(cherilyn, claudia)\nforall x (Dovish(x) and Undrape(x, cherilyn) -> Author(x, claudia))\nforall x (Undrape(x, claudia) and not Author(x, homer) -> Undrape(x, homer))\nforall x (Undrape(x, lloyd) -> Zambian(x))\nInaugurate(cherilyn, homer) -> Undrape(homer, claudia)\nforall x (Author(x, lloyd) -> Undrape(x, lloyd))\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Delphian(x))\n\nnot Delphian(lloyd)\n\ntherefore Delphian(lloyd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The betteann forward the sharon. The sharon is zambian. The brina is not ephesian. The heida forward the brina. If something is sexless and it clamber the heida then it forward the brina. If something clamber the brina and it does not need the betteann then it clamber the betteann. If something clamber the sharon then it is evidential. If the heida gong the betteann then the betteann clamber the brina. If something forward the sharon then it clamber the sharon. If something is evidential then it is zambian. The betteann clamber the sharon.", "logic": "\nForward(betteann, sharon)\nZambian(sharon)\nnot Ephesian(brina)\nForward(heida, brina)\nforall x (Sexless(x) and Clamber(x, heida) -> Forward(x, brina))\nforall x (Clamber(x, brina) and not Forward(x, betteann) -> Clamber(x, betteann))\nforall x (Clamber(x, sharon) -> Evidential(x))\nGong(heida, betteann) -> Clamber(betteann, brina)\nforall x (Forward(x, sharon) -> Clamber(x, sharon))\nforall x (Evidential(x) -> Zambian(x))\n\nClamber(betteann, sharon)\n\nForward(betteann, sharon) and forall x (Forward(x, sharon) -> Clamber(x, sharon)) -> therefore Clamber(betteann, sharon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The ilka sellotape the tine. The tine is untimbered. The izak is not vestiary. The renae sellotape the izak. If something is electoral and it arrange the renae then it sellotape the izak. If something arrange the izak and it does not need the ilka then it arrange the ilka. If something arrange the tine then it is fried. If the renae republish the ilka then the ilka arrange the izak. If something sellotape the tine then it arrange the tine. If something is fried then it is untimbered. The ilka does not chase the tine.", "logic": "\nSellotape(ilka, tine)\nUntimbered(tine)\nnot Vestiary(izak)\nSellotape(renae, izak)\nforall x (Electoral(x) and Arrange(x, renae) -> Sellotape(x, izak))\nforall x (Arrange(x, izak) and not Sellotape(x, ilka) -> Arrange(x, ilka))\nforall x (Arrange(x, tine) -> Fried(x))\nRepublish(renae, ilka) -> Arrange(ilka, izak)\nforall x (Sellotape(x, tine) -> Arrange(x, tine))\nforall x (Fried(x) -> Untimbered(x))\n\nnot Arrange(ilka, tine)\n\nSellotape(ilka, tine) and forall x (Sellotape(x, tine) -> Arrange(x, tine)) -> therefore Arrange(ilka, tine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The mayor civilise the angie. The angie is annulate. The emmeline is not succinic. The franciska civilise the emmeline. If something is indignant and it harshen the franciska then it civilise the emmeline. If something harshen the emmeline and it does not need the mayor then it harshen the mayor. If something harshen the angie then it is codified. If the franciska culture the mayor then the mayor harshen the emmeline. If something civilise the angie then it harshen the angie. If something is codified then it is annulate. The mayor is codified.", "logic": "\nCivilise(mayor, angie)\nAnnulate(angie)\nnot Succinic(emmeline)\nCivilise(franciska, emmeline)\nforall x (Indignant(x) and Harshen(x, franciska) -> Civilise(x, emmeline))\nforall x (Harshen(x, emmeline) and not Civilise(x, mayor) -> Harshen(x, mayor))\nforall x (Harshen(x, angie) -> Codified(x))\nCulture(franciska, mayor) -> Harshen(mayor, emmeline)\nforall x (Civilise(x, angie) -> Harshen(x, angie))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Annulate(x))\n\nCodified(mayor)\n\nCivilise(mayor, angie) and forall x (Civilise(x, angie) -> Harshen(x, angie)) -> therefore Harshen(mayor, angie) Harshen(mayor, angie) and forall x (Harshen(x, angie) -> Codified(x)) -> therefore Codified(mayor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The desmund yield the carmon. The carmon is faltering. The clifford is not triassic. The ethelda yield the clifford. If something is random and it jumpstart the ethelda then it yield the clifford. If something jumpstart the clifford and it does not need the desmund then it jumpstart the desmund. If something jumpstart the carmon then it is dyslexic. If the ethelda mainline the desmund then the desmund jumpstart the clifford. If something yield the carmon then it jumpstart the carmon. If something is dyslexic then it is faltering. The desmund is not dyslexic.", "logic": "\nYield(desmund, carmon)\nFaltering(carmon)\nnot Triassic(clifford)\nYield(ethelda, clifford)\nforall x (Random(x) and Jumpstart(x, ethelda) -> Yield(x, clifford))\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, clifford) and not Yield(x, desmund) -> Jumpstart(x, desmund))\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, carmon) -> Dyslexic(x))\nMainline(ethelda, desmund) -> Jumpstart(desmund, clifford)\nforall x (Yield(x, carmon) -> Jumpstart(x, carmon))\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) -> Faltering(x))\n\nnot Dyslexic(desmund)\n\nYield(desmund, carmon) and forall x (Yield(x, carmon) -> Jumpstart(x, carmon)) -> therefore Jumpstart(desmund, carmon) Jumpstart(desmund, carmon) and forall x (Jumpstart(x, carmon) -> Dyslexic(x)) -> therefore Dyslexic(desmund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The alysia evolve the lilli. The lilli is unoccupied. The marcello is not migratory. The othilie evolve the marcello. If something is antenatal and it color the othilie then it evolve the marcello. If something color the marcello and it does not need the alysia then it color the alysia. If something color the lilli then it is gyral. If the othilie drip the alysia then the alysia color the marcello. If something evolve the lilli then it color the lilli. If something is gyral then it is unoccupied. The alysia is unoccupied.", "logic": "\nEvolve(alysia, lilli)\nUnoccupied(lilli)\nnot Migratory(marcello)\nEvolve(othilie, marcello)\nforall x (Antenatal(x) and Color(x, othilie) -> Evolve(x, marcello))\nforall x (Color(x, marcello) and not Evolve(x, alysia) -> Color(x, alysia))\nforall x (Color(x, lilli) -> Gyral(x))\nDrip(othilie, alysia) -> Color(alysia, marcello)\nforall x (Evolve(x, lilli) -> Color(x, lilli))\nforall x (Gyral(x) -> Unoccupied(x))\n\nUnoccupied(alysia)\n\nEvolve(alysia, lilli) and forall x (Evolve(x, lilli) -> Color(x, lilli)) -> therefore Color(alysia, lilli) Color(alysia, lilli) and forall x (Color(x, lilli) -> Gyral(x)) -> therefore Gyral(alysia) Gyral(alysia) and forall x (Gyral(x) -> Unoccupied(x)) -> therefore Unoccupied(alysia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The ruddy inventory the bernard. The bernard is porcine. The patrick is not cellular. The herculie inventory the patrick. If something is electronic and it trammel the herculie then it inventory the patrick. If something trammel the patrick and it does not need the ruddy then it trammel the ruddy. If something trammel the bernard then it is quaint. If the herculie seat the ruddy then the ruddy trammel the patrick. If something inventory the bernard then it trammel the bernard. If something is quaint then it is porcine. The ruddy is not porcine.", "logic": "\nInventory(ruddy, bernard)\nPorcine(bernard)\nnot Cellular(patrick)\nInventory(herculie, patrick)\nforall x (Electronic(x) and Trammel(x, herculie) -> Inventory(x, patrick))\nforall x (Trammel(x, patrick) and not Inventory(x, ruddy) -> Trammel(x, ruddy))\nforall x (Trammel(x, bernard) -> Quaint(x))\nSeat(herculie, ruddy) -> Trammel(ruddy, patrick)\nforall x (Inventory(x, bernard) -> Trammel(x, bernard))\nforall x (Quaint(x) -> Porcine(x))\n\nnot Porcine(ruddy)\n\nInventory(ruddy, bernard) and forall x (Inventory(x, bernard) -> Trammel(x, bernard)) -> therefore Trammel(ruddy, bernard) Trammel(ruddy, bernard) and forall x (Trammel(x, bernard) -> Quaint(x)) -> therefore Quaint(ruddy) Quaint(ruddy) and forall x (Quaint(x) -> Porcine(x)) -> therefore Porcine(ruddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The ugo hurrah the teena. The teena is pancreatic. The woody is not equestrian. The carl hurrah the woody. If something is profaned and it tippytoe the carl then it hurrah the woody. If something tippytoe the woody and it does not need the ugo then it tippytoe the ugo. If something tippytoe the teena then it is parttime. If the carl novate the ugo then the ugo tippytoe the woody. If something hurrah the teena then it tippytoe the teena. If something is parttime then it is pancreatic. The carl does not chase the ugo.", "logic": "\nHurrah(ugo, teena)\nPancreatic(teena)\nnot Equestrian(woody)\nHurrah(carl, woody)\nforall x (Profaned(x) and Tippytoe(x, carl) -> Hurrah(x, woody))\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, woody) and not Hurrah(x, ugo) -> Tippytoe(x, ugo))\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, teena) -> Parttime(x))\nNovate(carl, ugo) -> Tippytoe(ugo, woody)\nforall x (Hurrah(x, teena) -> Tippytoe(x, teena))\nforall x (Parttime(x) -> Pancreatic(x))\n\nnot Tippytoe(carl, ugo)\n\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, woody) and not Hurrah(x, ugo) -> Tippytoe(x, ugo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The nanice react the forrester. The forrester is balsamy. The farra is not heathenish. The uriel react the farra. If something is oxidised and it wage the uriel then it react the farra. If something wage the farra and it does not need the nanice then it wage the nanice. If something wage the forrester then it is imminent. If the uriel drub the nanice then the nanice wage the farra. If something react the forrester then it wage the forrester. If something is imminent then it is balsamy. The farra wage the nanice.", "logic": "\nReact(nanice, forrester)\nBalsamy(forrester)\nnot Heathenish(farra)\nReact(uriel, farra)\nforall x (Oxidised(x) and Wage(x, uriel) -> React(x, farra))\nforall x (Wage(x, farra) and not React(x, nanice) -> Wage(x, nanice))\nforall x (Wage(x, forrester) -> Imminent(x))\nDrub(uriel, nanice) -> Wage(nanice, farra)\nforall x (React(x, forrester) -> Wage(x, forrester))\nforall x (Imminent(x) -> Balsamy(x))\n\nWage(farra, nanice)\n\nforall x (Wage(x, farra) and not React(x, nanice) -> Wage(x, nanice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The quintin input the debi. The debi is laughable. The joycelin is not icteric. The edwina input the joycelin. If something is vesicatory and it syllabify the edwina then it input the joycelin. If something syllabify the joycelin and it does not need the quintin then it syllabify the quintin. If something syllabify the debi then it is fatalistic. If the edwina cocainize the quintin then the quintin syllabify the joycelin. If something input the debi then it syllabify the debi. If something is fatalistic then it is laughable. The edwina does not chase the debi.", "logic": "\nInput(quintin, debi)\nLaughable(debi)\nnot Icteric(joycelin)\nInput(edwina, joycelin)\nforall x (Vesicatory(x) and Syllabify(x, edwina) -> Input(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Syllabify(x, joycelin) and not Input(x, quintin) -> Syllabify(x, quintin))\nforall x (Syllabify(x, debi) -> Fatalistic(x))\nCocainize(edwina, quintin) -> Syllabify(quintin, joycelin)\nforall x (Input(x, debi) -> Syllabify(x, debi))\nforall x (Fatalistic(x) -> Laughable(x))\n\nnot Syllabify(edwina, debi)\n\nforall x (Input(x, debi) -> Syllabify(x, debi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The hendrick foxtrot the benjamen. The benjamen is aquatic. The vina is not split. The sherwynd foxtrot the vina. If something is shipboard and it volunteer the sherwynd then it foxtrot the vina. If something volunteer the vina and it does not need the hendrick then it volunteer the hendrick. If something volunteer the benjamen then it is twinned. If the sherwynd pirouette the hendrick then the hendrick volunteer the vina. If something foxtrot the benjamen then it volunteer the benjamen. If something is twinned then it is aquatic. The vina volunteer the benjamen.", "logic": "\nFoxtrot(hendrick, benjamen)\nAquatic(benjamen)\nnot Split(vina)\nFoxtrot(sherwynd, vina)\nforall x (Shipboard(x) and Volunteer(x, sherwynd) -> Foxtrot(x, vina))\nforall x (Volunteer(x, vina) and not Foxtrot(x, hendrick) -> Volunteer(x, hendrick))\nforall x (Volunteer(x, benjamen) -> Twinned(x))\nPirouette(sherwynd, hendrick) -> Volunteer(hendrick, vina)\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, benjamen) -> Volunteer(x, benjamen))\nforall x (Twinned(x) -> Aquatic(x))\n\nVolunteer(vina, benjamen)\n\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, benjamen) -> Volunteer(x, benjamen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The bennett brace the mildrid. The mildrid is reedlike. The leia is not plummy. The wendy brace the leia. If something is formal and it juxtapose the wendy then it brace the leia. If something juxtapose the leia and it does not need the bennett then it juxtapose the bennett. If something juxtapose the mildrid then it is plodding. If the wendy humidify the bennett then the bennett juxtapose the leia. If something brace the mildrid then it juxtapose the mildrid. If something is plodding then it is reedlike. The mildrid does not visit the mildrid.", "logic": "\nBrace(bennett, mildrid)\nReedlike(mildrid)\nnot Plummy(leia)\nBrace(wendy, leia)\nforall x (Formal(x) and Juxtapose(x, wendy) -> Brace(x, leia))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, leia) and not Brace(x, bennett) -> Juxtapose(x, bennett))\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, mildrid) -> Plodding(x))\nHumidify(wendy, bennett) -> Juxtapose(bennett, leia)\nforall x (Brace(x, mildrid) -> Juxtapose(x, mildrid))\nforall x (Plodding(x) -> Reedlike(x))\n\nnot Humidify(mildrid, mildrid)\n\nnot Humidify(mildrid, mildrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The matti filet the john. The john is chaffy. The cele is not nubby. The eddi filet the cele. If something is ukrainian and it threaten the eddi then it filet the cele. If something threaten the cele and it does not need the matti then it threaten the matti. If something threaten the john then it is satisfied. If the eddi dither the matti then the matti threaten the cele. If something filet the john then it threaten the john. If something is satisfied then it is chaffy. The john threaten the cele.", "logic": "\nFilet(matti, john)\nChaffy(john)\nnot Nubby(cele)\nFilet(eddi, cele)\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) and Threaten(x, eddi) -> Filet(x, cele))\nforall x (Threaten(x, cele) and not Filet(x, matti) -> Threaten(x, matti))\nforall x (Threaten(x, john) -> Satisfied(x))\nDither(eddi, matti) -> Threaten(matti, cele)\nforall x (Filet(x, john) -> Threaten(x, john))\nforall x (Satisfied(x) -> Chaffy(x))\n\nThreaten(john, cele)\n\nThreaten(john, cele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The una bind the igor. The igor is cryonic. The loria is not choleraic. The dorelle bind the loria. If something is aeschylean and it acquire the dorelle then it bind the loria. If something acquire the loria and it does not need the una then it acquire the una. If something acquire the igor then it is nominal. If the dorelle profane the una then the una acquire the loria. If something bind the igor then it acquire the igor. If something is nominal then it is cryonic. The loria does not need the dorelle.", "logic": "\nBind(una, igor)\nCryonic(igor)\nnot Choleraic(loria)\nBind(dorelle, loria)\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) and Acquire(x, dorelle) -> Bind(x, loria))\nforall x (Acquire(x, loria) and not Bind(x, una) -> Acquire(x, una))\nforall x (Acquire(x, igor) -> Nominal(x))\nProfane(dorelle, una) -> Acquire(una, loria)\nforall x (Bind(x, igor) -> Acquire(x, igor))\nforall x (Nominal(x) -> Cryonic(x))\n\nnot Bind(loria, dorelle)\n\nnot Bind(loria, dorelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "The mozelle disembroil the ole. The ole is basipetal. The sarah is not postnatal. The tessy disembroil the sarah. If something is censored and it reevaluate the tessy then it disembroil the sarah. If something reevaluate the sarah and it does not need the mozelle then it reevaluate the mozelle. If something reevaluate the ole then it is resupine. If the tessy tusk the mozelle then the mozelle reevaluate the sarah. If something disembroil the ole then it reevaluate the ole. If something is resupine then it is basipetal. The tessy is postnatal.", "logic": "\nDisembroil(mozelle, ole)\nBasipetal(ole)\nnot Postnatal(sarah)\nDisembroil(tessy, sarah)\nforall x (Censored(x) and Reevaluate(x, tessy) -> Disembroil(x, sarah))\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, sarah) and not Disembroil(x, mozelle) -> Reevaluate(x, mozelle))\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, ole) -> Resupine(x))\nTusk(tessy, mozelle) -> Reevaluate(mozelle, sarah)\nforall x (Disembroil(x, ole) -> Reevaluate(x, ole))\nforall x (Resupine(x) -> Basipetal(x))\n\nPostnatal(tessy)\n\nPostnatal(tessy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1343"} {"premises": "Marjorie is abiding. Marjorie is spiked. Marjorie is preanal. Marjorie is runcinate. Marjorie is salutary. Thomasine is spiked. Thomasine is yogic. Thomasine is preanal. Thomasine is runcinate. Thomasine is salutary. Audre is yogic. Audre is runcinate. Audre is salutary. Florencia is spiked. Florencia is runcinate. Florencia is salutary. If Marjorie is spiked and Marjorie is runcinate then Marjorie is effluent. Marjorie is preanal.", "logic": "\nAbiding(marjorie)\nSpiked(marjorie)\nPreanal(marjorie)\nRuncinate(marjorie)\nSalutary(marjorie)\nSpiked(thomasine)\nYogic(thomasine)\nPreanal(thomasine)\nRuncinate(thomasine)\nSalutary(thomasine)\nYogic(audre)\nRuncinate(audre)\nSalutary(audre)\nSpiked(florencia)\nRuncinate(florencia)\nSalutary(florencia)\nSpiked(marjorie) and Runcinate(marjorie) -> Effluent(marjorie)\n\nPreanal(marjorie)\n\ntherefore Preanal(marjorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6891"} {"premises": "Charlotte is revokable. Charlotte is odourless. Charlotte is diminished. Charlotte is brachial. Charlotte is huffy. Clemmy is odourless. Clemmy is identified. Clemmy is diminished. Clemmy is brachial. Clemmy is huffy. Elysia is identified. Elysia is brachial. Elysia is huffy. Emmery is odourless. Emmery is brachial. Emmery is huffy. If Charlotte is odourless and Charlotte is brachial then Charlotte is laden. Charlotte is not diminished.", "logic": "\nRevokable(charlotte)\nOdourless(charlotte)\nDiminished(charlotte)\nBrachial(charlotte)\nHuffy(charlotte)\nOdourless(clemmy)\nIdentified(clemmy)\nDiminished(clemmy)\nBrachial(clemmy)\nHuffy(clemmy)\nIdentified(elysia)\nBrachial(elysia)\nHuffy(elysia)\nOdourless(emmery)\nBrachial(emmery)\nHuffy(emmery)\nOdourless(charlotte) and Brachial(charlotte) -> Laden(charlotte)\n\nnot Diminished(charlotte)\n\ntherefore Diminished(charlotte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6891"} {"premises": "Anselm is soundable. Anselm is aseptic. Anselm is willful. Anselm is purposeful. Anselm is controlled. Gerda is aseptic. Gerda is stemmatic. Gerda is willful. Gerda is purposeful. Gerda is controlled. Vite is stemmatic. Vite is purposeful. Vite is controlled. Hadrian is aseptic. Hadrian is purposeful. Hadrian is controlled. If Anselm is aseptic and Anselm is purposeful then Anselm is oblivious. Hadrian is not willful.", "logic": "\nSoundable(anselm)\nAseptic(anselm)\nWillful(anselm)\nPurposeful(anselm)\nControlled(anselm)\nAseptic(gerda)\nStemmatic(gerda)\nWillful(gerda)\nPurposeful(gerda)\nControlled(gerda)\nStemmatic(vite)\nPurposeful(vite)\nControlled(vite)\nAseptic(hadrian)\nPurposeful(hadrian)\nControlled(hadrian)\nAseptic(anselm) and Purposeful(anselm) -> Oblivious(anselm)\n\nnot Willful(hadrian)\n\nnot Willful(hadrian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6891"} {"premises": "Othello is metabolic. Othello is monodical. Othello is bushed. Othello is dacitic. Othello is embryonal. Rafaelia is monodical. Rafaelia is cxxx. Rafaelia is bushed. Rafaelia is dacitic. Rafaelia is embryonal. Suzan is cxxx. Suzan is dacitic. Suzan is embryonal. Skyler is monodical. Skyler is dacitic. Skyler is embryonal. If Othello is monodical and Othello is dacitic then Othello is analogous. Skyler is metabolic.", "logic": "\nMetabolic(othello)\nMonodical(othello)\nBushed(othello)\nDacitic(othello)\nEmbryonal(othello)\nMonodical(rafaelia)\nCxxx(rafaelia)\nBushed(rafaelia)\nDacitic(rafaelia)\nEmbryonal(rafaelia)\nCxxx(suzan)\nDacitic(suzan)\nEmbryonal(suzan)\nMonodical(skyler)\nDacitic(skyler)\nEmbryonal(skyler)\nMonodical(othello) and Dacitic(othello) -> Analogous(othello)\n\nMetabolic(skyler)\n\nMetabolic(skyler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6891"} {"premises": "The allis bias the mattias. The allis bias the rainer. The allis is handmade. The allis drone the mattias. The barbabas salt the mattias. The barbabas salt the rainer. The barbabas bias the mattias. The barbabas bias the rainer. The barbabas is handmade. The barbabas is untimely. The barbabas drone the allis. The mattias is handmade. The mattias drone the rainer. The rainer bias the mattias. The rainer is loathsome. If something bias the barbabas and the barbabas is nether then it bias the allis. If the allis drone the rainer and the allis bias the barbabas then the allis salt the rainer. If something bias the allis and it does not chase the mattias then the allis salt the rainer. If something drone the rainer then the rainer bias the allis. If the mattias salt the allis then the mattias is not handmade. If something salt the rainer and the rainer bias the allis then the rainer drone the barbabas. If the rainer bias the allis and the rainer drone the barbabas then the barbabas is loathsome. If the rainer is nether and the allis does not chase the rainer then the rainer does not need the allis. The rainer bias the mattias.", "logic": "\nBias(allis, mattias)\nBias(allis, rainer)\nHandmade(allis)\nDrone(allis, mattias)\nSalt(barbabas, mattias)\nSalt(barbabas, rainer)\nBias(barbabas, mattias)\nBias(barbabas, rainer)\nHandmade(barbabas)\nUntimely(barbabas)\nDrone(barbabas, allis)\nHandmade(mattias)\nDrone(mattias, rainer)\nBias(rainer, mattias)\nLoathsome(rainer)\nforall x (Bias(x, barbabas) and Nether(barbabas) -> Bias(x, allis))\nDrone(allis, rainer) and Bias(allis, barbabas) -> Salt(allis, rainer)\nforall x (Bias(x, allis) and not Salt(x, mattias) -> Salt(allis, rainer))\nforall x (Drone(x, rainer) -> Bias(rainer, allis))\nSalt(mattias, allis) -> not Handmade(mattias)\nforall x (Salt(x, rainer) and Bias(rainer, allis) -> Drone(rainer, barbabas))\nBias(rainer, allis) and Drone(rainer, barbabas) -> Loathsome(barbabas)\nNether(rainer) and not Salt(allis, rainer) -> not Drone(rainer, allis)\n\nBias(rainer, mattias)\n\ntherefore Bias(rainer, mattias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The hakim untwist the kimberlee. The hakim untwist the kimberlee. The hakim is avian. The hakim bloat the kimberlee. The libbie coach the kimberlee. The libbie coach the kimberlee. The libbie untwist the kimberlee. The libbie untwist the kimberlee. The libbie is avian. The libbie is pregnant. The libbie bloat the hakim. The kimberlee is avian. The kimberlee bloat the kimberlee. The kimberlee untwist the kimberlee. The kimberlee is cursorial. If something untwist the libbie and the libbie is carmine then it untwist the hakim. If the hakim bloat the kimberlee and the hakim untwist the libbie then the hakim coach the kimberlee. If something untwist the hakim and it does not chase the kimberlee then the hakim coach the kimberlee. If something bloat the kimberlee then the kimberlee untwist the hakim. If the kimberlee coach the hakim then the kimberlee is not avian. If something coach the kimberlee and the kimberlee untwist the hakim then the kimberlee bloat the libbie. If the kimberlee untwist the hakim and the kimberlee bloat the libbie then the libbie is cursorial. If the kimberlee is carmine and the hakim does not chase the kimberlee then the kimberlee does not need the hakim. The kimberlee is not cursorial.", "logic": "\nUntwist(hakim, kimberlee)\nUntwist(hakim, kimberlee)\nAvian(hakim)\nBloat(hakim, kimberlee)\nCoach(libbie, kimberlee)\nCoach(libbie, kimberlee)\nUntwist(libbie, kimberlee)\nUntwist(libbie, kimberlee)\nAvian(libbie)\nPregnant(libbie)\nBloat(libbie, hakim)\nAvian(kimberlee)\nBloat(kimberlee, kimberlee)\nUntwist(kimberlee, kimberlee)\nCursorial(kimberlee)\nforall x (Untwist(x, libbie) and Carmine(libbie) -> Untwist(x, hakim))\nBloat(hakim, kimberlee) and Untwist(hakim, libbie) -> Coach(hakim, kimberlee)\nforall x (Untwist(x, hakim) and not Coach(x, kimberlee) -> Coach(hakim, kimberlee))\nforall x (Bloat(x, kimberlee) -> Untwist(kimberlee, hakim))\nCoach(kimberlee, hakim) -> not Avian(kimberlee)\nforall x (Coach(x, kimberlee) and Untwist(kimberlee, hakim) -> Bloat(kimberlee, libbie))\nUntwist(kimberlee, hakim) and Bloat(kimberlee, libbie) -> Cursorial(libbie)\nCarmine(kimberlee) and not Coach(hakim, kimberlee) -> not Bloat(kimberlee, hakim)\n\nnot Cursorial(kimberlee)\n\ntherefore Cursorial(kimberlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The elihu munition the rachael. The elihu munition the genny. The elihu is bettering. The elihu array the rachael. The vachel gargle the rachael. The vachel gargle the genny. The vachel munition the rachael. The vachel munition the genny. The vachel is bettering. The vachel is reversed. The vachel array the elihu. The rachael is bettering. The rachael array the genny. The genny munition the rachael. The genny is unwitting. If something munition the vachel and the vachel is anesthetic then it munition the elihu. If the elihu array the genny and the elihu munition the vachel then the elihu gargle the genny. If something munition the elihu and it does not chase the rachael then the elihu gargle the genny. If something array the genny then the genny munition the elihu. If the rachael gargle the elihu then the rachael is not bettering. If something gargle the genny and the genny munition the elihu then the genny array the vachel. If the genny munition the elihu and the genny array the vachel then the vachel is unwitting. If the genny is anesthetic and the elihu does not chase the genny then the genny does not need the elihu. The genny munition the elihu.", "logic": "\nMunition(elihu, rachael)\nMunition(elihu, genny)\nBettering(elihu)\nArray(elihu, rachael)\nGargle(vachel, rachael)\nGargle(vachel, genny)\nMunition(vachel, rachael)\nMunition(vachel, genny)\nBettering(vachel)\nReversed(vachel)\nArray(vachel, elihu)\nBettering(rachael)\nArray(rachael, genny)\nMunition(genny, rachael)\nUnwitting(genny)\nforall x (Munition(x, vachel) and Anesthetic(vachel) -> Munition(x, elihu))\nArray(elihu, genny) and Munition(elihu, vachel) -> Gargle(elihu, genny)\nforall x (Munition(x, elihu) and not Gargle(x, rachael) -> Gargle(elihu, genny))\nforall x (Array(x, genny) -> Munition(genny, elihu))\nGargle(rachael, elihu) -> not Bettering(rachael)\nforall x (Gargle(x, genny) and Munition(genny, elihu) -> Array(genny, vachel))\nMunition(genny, elihu) and Array(genny, vachel) -> Unwitting(vachel)\nAnesthetic(genny) and not Gargle(elihu, genny) -> not Array(genny, elihu)\n\nMunition(genny, elihu)\n\nArray(rachael, genny) and forall x (Array(x, genny) -> Munition(genny, elihu)) -> therefore Munition(genny, elihu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The kristi peek the sloane. The kristi peek the hayes. The kristi is isochronal. The kristi know the sloane. The keil bash the sloane. The keil bash the hayes. The keil peek the sloane. The keil peek the hayes. The keil is isochronal. The keil is confirmed. The keil know the kristi. The sloane is isochronal. The sloane know the hayes. The hayes peek the sloane. The hayes is asthenic. If something peek the keil and the keil is delighted then it peek the kristi. If the kristi know the hayes and the kristi peek the keil then the kristi bash the hayes. If something peek the kristi and it does not chase the sloane then the kristi bash the hayes. If something know the hayes then the hayes peek the kristi. If the sloane bash the kristi then the sloane is not isochronal. If something bash the hayes and the hayes peek the kristi then the hayes know the keil. If the hayes peek the kristi and the hayes know the keil then the keil is asthenic. If the hayes is delighted and the kristi does not chase the hayes then the hayes does not need the kristi. The hayes does not eat the kristi.", "logic": "\nPeek(kristi, sloane)\nPeek(kristi, hayes)\nIsochronal(kristi)\nKnow(kristi, sloane)\nBash(keil, sloane)\nBash(keil, hayes)\nPeek(keil, sloane)\nPeek(keil, hayes)\nIsochronal(keil)\nConfirmed(keil)\nKnow(keil, kristi)\nIsochronal(sloane)\nKnow(sloane, hayes)\nPeek(hayes, sloane)\nAsthenic(hayes)\nforall x (Peek(x, keil) and Delighted(keil) -> Peek(x, kristi))\nKnow(kristi, hayes) and Peek(kristi, keil) -> Bash(kristi, hayes)\nforall x (Peek(x, kristi) and not Bash(x, sloane) -> Bash(kristi, hayes))\nforall x (Know(x, hayes) -> Peek(hayes, kristi))\nBash(sloane, kristi) -> not Isochronal(sloane)\nforall x (Bash(x, hayes) and Peek(hayes, kristi) -> Know(hayes, keil))\nPeek(hayes, kristi) and Know(hayes, keil) -> Asthenic(keil)\nDelighted(hayes) and not Bash(kristi, hayes) -> not Know(hayes, kristi)\n\nnot Peek(hayes, kristi)\n\nKnow(sloane, hayes) and forall x (Know(x, hayes) -> Peek(hayes, kristi)) -> therefore Peek(hayes, kristi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The garp stratify the greta. The garp stratify the ursuline. The garp is thin. The garp madder the greta. The lori featherbed the greta. The lori featherbed the ursuline. The lori stratify the greta. The lori stratify the ursuline. The lori is thin. The lori is afire. The lori madder the garp. The greta is thin. The greta madder the ursuline. The ursuline stratify the greta. The ursuline is affordable. If something stratify the lori and the lori is saltish then it stratify the garp. If the garp madder the ursuline and the garp stratify the lori then the garp featherbed the ursuline. If something stratify the garp and it does not chase the greta then the garp featherbed the ursuline. If something madder the ursuline then the ursuline stratify the garp. If the greta featherbed the garp then the greta is not thin. If something featherbed the ursuline and the ursuline stratify the garp then the ursuline madder the lori. If the ursuline stratify the garp and the ursuline madder the lori then the lori is affordable. If the ursuline is saltish and the garp does not chase the ursuline then the ursuline does not need the garp. The ursuline madder the lori.", "logic": "\nStratify(garp, greta)\nStratify(garp, ursuline)\nThin(garp)\nMadder(garp, greta)\nFeatherbed(lori, greta)\nFeatherbed(lori, ursuline)\nStratify(lori, greta)\nStratify(lori, ursuline)\nThin(lori)\nAfire(lori)\nMadder(lori, garp)\nThin(greta)\nMadder(greta, ursuline)\nStratify(ursuline, greta)\nAffordable(ursuline)\nforall x (Stratify(x, lori) and Saltish(lori) -> Stratify(x, garp))\nMadder(garp, ursuline) and Stratify(garp, lori) -> Featherbed(garp, ursuline)\nforall x (Stratify(x, garp) and not Featherbed(x, greta) -> Featherbed(garp, ursuline))\nforall x (Madder(x, ursuline) -> Stratify(ursuline, garp))\nFeatherbed(greta, garp) -> not Thin(greta)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, ursuline) and Stratify(ursuline, garp) -> Madder(ursuline, lori))\nStratify(ursuline, garp) and Madder(ursuline, lori) -> Affordable(lori)\nSaltish(ursuline) and not Featherbed(garp, ursuline) -> not Madder(ursuline, garp)\n\nMadder(ursuline, lori)\n\nMadder(greta, ursuline) and forall x (Madder(x, ursuline) -> Stratify(ursuline, garp)) -> therefore Stratify(ursuline, garp) Featherbed(lori, ursuline) and Stratify(ursuline, garp) and forall x (Featherbed(x, ursuline) and Stratify(ursuline, garp) -> Madder(ursuline, lori)) -> therefore Madder(ursuline, lori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The osmund mouth the binnie. The osmund mouth the andri. The osmund is collective. The osmund utilise the binnie. The tamiko cascade the binnie. The tamiko cascade the andri. The tamiko mouth the binnie. The tamiko mouth the andri. The tamiko is collective. The tamiko is fictitious. The tamiko utilise the osmund. The binnie is collective. The binnie utilise the andri. The andri mouth the binnie. The andri is woozy. If something mouth the tamiko and the tamiko is bent then it mouth the osmund. If the osmund utilise the andri and the osmund mouth the tamiko then the osmund cascade the andri. If something mouth the osmund and it does not chase the binnie then the osmund cascade the andri. If something utilise the andri then the andri mouth the osmund. If the binnie cascade the osmund then the binnie is not collective. If something cascade the andri and the andri mouth the osmund then the andri utilise the tamiko. If the andri mouth the osmund and the andri utilise the tamiko then the tamiko is woozy. If the andri is bent and the osmund does not chase the andri then the andri does not need the osmund. The andri does not need the tamiko.", "logic": "\nMouth(osmund, binnie)\nMouth(osmund, andri)\nCollective(osmund)\nUtilise(osmund, binnie)\nCascade(tamiko, binnie)\nCascade(tamiko, andri)\nMouth(tamiko, binnie)\nMouth(tamiko, andri)\nCollective(tamiko)\nFictitious(tamiko)\nUtilise(tamiko, osmund)\nCollective(binnie)\nUtilise(binnie, andri)\nMouth(andri, binnie)\nWoozy(andri)\nforall x (Mouth(x, tamiko) and Bent(tamiko) -> Mouth(x, osmund))\nUtilise(osmund, andri) and Mouth(osmund, tamiko) -> Cascade(osmund, andri)\nforall x (Mouth(x, osmund) and not Cascade(x, binnie) -> Cascade(osmund, andri))\nforall x (Utilise(x, andri) -> Mouth(andri, osmund))\nCascade(binnie, osmund) -> not Collective(binnie)\nforall x (Cascade(x, andri) and Mouth(andri, osmund) -> Utilise(andri, tamiko))\nMouth(andri, osmund) and Utilise(andri, tamiko) -> Woozy(tamiko)\nBent(andri) and not Cascade(osmund, andri) -> not Utilise(andri, osmund)\n\nnot Utilise(andri, tamiko)\n\nUtilise(binnie, andri) and forall x (Utilise(x, andri) -> Mouth(andri, osmund)) -> therefore Mouth(andri, osmund) Cascade(tamiko, andri) and Mouth(andri, osmund) and forall x (Cascade(x, andri) and Mouth(andri, osmund) -> Utilise(andri, tamiko)) -> therefore Utilise(andri, tamiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The saba seed the wilie. The saba seed the wilden. The saba is isolating. The saba encrimson the wilie. The bonita chime the wilie. The bonita chime the wilden. The bonita seed the wilie. The bonita seed the wilden. The bonita is isolating. The bonita is elder. The bonita encrimson the saba. The wilie is isolating. The wilie encrimson the wilden. The wilden seed the wilie. The wilden is euphonous. If something seed the bonita and the bonita is tacky then it seed the saba. If the saba encrimson the wilden and the saba seed the bonita then the saba chime the wilden. If something seed the saba and it does not chase the wilie then the saba chime the wilden. If something encrimson the wilden then the wilden seed the saba. If the wilie chime the saba then the wilie is not isolating. If something chime the wilden and the wilden seed the saba then the wilden encrimson the bonita. If the wilden seed the saba and the wilden encrimson the bonita then the bonita is euphonous. If the wilden is tacky and the saba does not chase the wilden then the wilden does not need the saba. The bonita is euphonous.", "logic": "\nSeed(saba, wilie)\nSeed(saba, wilden)\nIsolating(saba)\nEncrimson(saba, wilie)\nChime(bonita, wilie)\nChime(bonita, wilden)\nSeed(bonita, wilie)\nSeed(bonita, wilden)\nIsolating(bonita)\nElder(bonita)\nEncrimson(bonita, saba)\nIsolating(wilie)\nEncrimson(wilie, wilden)\nSeed(wilden, wilie)\nEuphonous(wilden)\nforall x (Seed(x, bonita) and Tacky(bonita) -> Seed(x, saba))\nEncrimson(saba, wilden) and Seed(saba, bonita) -> Chime(saba, wilden)\nforall x (Seed(x, saba) and not Chime(x, wilie) -> Chime(saba, wilden))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, wilden) -> Seed(wilden, saba))\nChime(wilie, saba) -> not Isolating(wilie)\nforall x (Chime(x, wilden) and Seed(wilden, saba) -> Encrimson(wilden, bonita))\nSeed(wilden, saba) and Encrimson(wilden, bonita) -> Euphonous(bonita)\nTacky(wilden) and not Chime(saba, wilden) -> not Encrimson(wilden, saba)\n\nEuphonous(bonita)\n\nEncrimson(wilie, wilden) and forall x (Encrimson(x, wilden) -> Seed(wilden, saba)) -> therefore Seed(wilden, saba) Encrimson(wilie, wilden) and forall x (Encrimson(x, wilden) -> Seed(wilden, saba)) -> therefore Seed(wilden, saba) Chime(bonita, wilden) and Seed(wilden, saba) and forall x (Chime(x, wilden) and Seed(wilden, saba) -> Encrimson(wilden, bonita)) -> therefore Encrimson(wilden, bonita) Seed(wilden, saba) and Encrimson(wilden, bonita) and Seed(wilden, saba) and Encrimson(wilden, bonita) -> Euphonous(bonita) -> therefore Euphonous(bonita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The tiebout riot the davie. The tiebout riot the raymond. The tiebout is turgid. The tiebout disenable the davie. The rickie condemn the davie. The rickie condemn the raymond. The rickie riot the davie. The rickie riot the raymond. The rickie is turgid. The rickie is coexistent. The rickie disenable the tiebout. The davie is turgid. The davie disenable the raymond. The raymond riot the davie. The raymond is unwitting. If something riot the rickie and the rickie is vesicular then it riot the tiebout. If the tiebout disenable the raymond and the tiebout riot the rickie then the tiebout condemn the raymond. If something riot the tiebout and it does not chase the davie then the tiebout condemn the raymond. If something disenable the raymond then the raymond riot the tiebout. If the davie condemn the tiebout then the davie is not turgid. If something condemn the raymond and the raymond riot the tiebout then the raymond disenable the rickie. If the raymond riot the tiebout and the raymond disenable the rickie then the rickie is unwitting. If the raymond is vesicular and the tiebout does not chase the raymond then the raymond does not need the tiebout. The rickie is not unwitting.", "logic": "\nRiot(tiebout, davie)\nRiot(tiebout, raymond)\nTurgid(tiebout)\nDisenable(tiebout, davie)\nCondemn(rickie, davie)\nCondemn(rickie, raymond)\nRiot(rickie, davie)\nRiot(rickie, raymond)\nTurgid(rickie)\nCoexistent(rickie)\nDisenable(rickie, tiebout)\nTurgid(davie)\nDisenable(davie, raymond)\nRiot(raymond, davie)\nUnwitting(raymond)\nforall x (Riot(x, rickie) and Vesicular(rickie) -> Riot(x, tiebout))\nDisenable(tiebout, raymond) and Riot(tiebout, rickie) -> Condemn(tiebout, raymond)\nforall x (Riot(x, tiebout) and not Condemn(x, davie) -> Condemn(tiebout, raymond))\nforall x (Disenable(x, raymond) -> Riot(raymond, tiebout))\nCondemn(davie, tiebout) -> not Turgid(davie)\nforall x (Condemn(x, raymond) and Riot(raymond, tiebout) -> Disenable(raymond, rickie))\nRiot(raymond, tiebout) and Disenable(raymond, rickie) -> Unwitting(rickie)\nVesicular(raymond) and not Condemn(tiebout, raymond) -> not Disenable(raymond, tiebout)\n\nnot Unwitting(rickie)\n\nDisenable(davie, raymond) and forall x (Disenable(x, raymond) -> Riot(raymond, tiebout)) -> therefore Riot(raymond, tiebout) Disenable(davie, raymond) and forall x (Disenable(x, raymond) -> Riot(raymond, tiebout)) -> therefore Riot(raymond, tiebout) Condemn(rickie, raymond) and Riot(raymond, tiebout) and forall x (Condemn(x, raymond) and Riot(raymond, tiebout) -> Disenable(raymond, rickie)) -> therefore Disenable(raymond, rickie) Riot(raymond, tiebout) and Disenable(raymond, rickie) and Riot(raymond, tiebout) and Disenable(raymond, rickie) -> Unwitting(rickie) -> therefore Unwitting(rickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The ketty foretell the suzi. The ketty foretell the ardys. The ketty is completed. The ketty festoon the suzi. The toma postmark the suzi. The toma postmark the ardys. The toma foretell the suzi. The toma foretell the ardys. The toma is completed. The toma is umptieth. The toma festoon the ketty. The suzi is completed. The suzi festoon the ardys. The ardys foretell the suzi. The ardys is suspected. If something foretell the toma and the toma is taunting then it foretell the ketty. If the ketty festoon the ardys and the ketty foretell the toma then the ketty postmark the ardys. If something foretell the ketty and it does not chase the suzi then the ketty postmark the ardys. If something festoon the ardys then the ardys foretell the ketty. If the suzi postmark the ketty then the suzi is not completed. If something postmark the ardys and the ardys foretell the ketty then the ardys festoon the toma. If the ardys foretell the ketty and the ardys festoon the toma then the toma is suspected. If the ardys is taunting and the ketty does not chase the ardys then the ardys does not need the ketty. The suzi does not eat the ketty.", "logic": "\nForetell(ketty, suzi)\nForetell(ketty, ardys)\nCompleted(ketty)\nFestoon(ketty, suzi)\nPostmark(toma, suzi)\nPostmark(toma, ardys)\nForetell(toma, suzi)\nForetell(toma, ardys)\nCompleted(toma)\nUmptieth(toma)\nFestoon(toma, ketty)\nCompleted(suzi)\nFestoon(suzi, ardys)\nForetell(ardys, suzi)\nSuspected(ardys)\nforall x (Foretell(x, toma) and Taunting(toma) -> Foretell(x, ketty))\nFestoon(ketty, ardys) and Foretell(ketty, toma) -> Postmark(ketty, ardys)\nforall x (Foretell(x, ketty) and not Postmark(x, suzi) -> Postmark(ketty, ardys))\nforall x (Festoon(x, ardys) -> Foretell(ardys, ketty))\nPostmark(suzi, ketty) -> not Completed(suzi)\nforall x (Postmark(x, ardys) and Foretell(ardys, ketty) -> Festoon(ardys, toma))\nForetell(ardys, ketty) and Festoon(ardys, toma) -> Suspected(toma)\nTaunting(ardys) and not Postmark(ketty, ardys) -> not Festoon(ardys, ketty)\n\nnot Foretell(suzi, ketty)\n\nforall x (Foretell(x, toma) and Taunting(toma) -> Foretell(x, ketty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The donni immix the bartel. The donni immix the melanie. The donni is dressed. The donni poetize the bartel. The sydney sonnet the bartel. The sydney sonnet the melanie. The sydney immix the bartel. The sydney immix the melanie. The sydney is dressed. The sydney is subject. The sydney poetize the donni. The bartel is dressed. The bartel poetize the melanie. The melanie immix the bartel. The melanie is fishy. If something immix the sydney and the sydney is lacking then it immix the donni. If the donni poetize the melanie and the donni immix the sydney then the donni sonnet the melanie. If something immix the donni and it does not chase the bartel then the donni sonnet the melanie. If something poetize the melanie then the melanie immix the donni. If the bartel sonnet the donni then the bartel is not dressed. If something sonnet the melanie and the melanie immix the donni then the melanie poetize the sydney. If the melanie immix the donni and the melanie poetize the sydney then the sydney is fishy. If the melanie is lacking and the donni does not chase the melanie then the melanie does not need the donni. The donni immix the donni.", "logic": "\nImmix(donni, bartel)\nImmix(donni, melanie)\nDressed(donni)\nPoetize(donni, bartel)\nSonnet(sydney, bartel)\nSonnet(sydney, melanie)\nImmix(sydney, bartel)\nImmix(sydney, melanie)\nDressed(sydney)\nSubject(sydney)\nPoetize(sydney, donni)\nDressed(bartel)\nPoetize(bartel, melanie)\nImmix(melanie, bartel)\nFishy(melanie)\nforall x (Immix(x, sydney) and Lacking(sydney) -> Immix(x, donni))\nPoetize(donni, melanie) and Immix(donni, sydney) -> Sonnet(donni, melanie)\nforall x (Immix(x, donni) and not Sonnet(x, bartel) -> Sonnet(donni, melanie))\nforall x (Poetize(x, melanie) -> Immix(melanie, donni))\nSonnet(bartel, donni) -> not Dressed(bartel)\nforall x (Sonnet(x, melanie) and Immix(melanie, donni) -> Poetize(melanie, sydney))\nImmix(melanie, donni) and Poetize(melanie, sydney) -> Fishy(sydney)\nLacking(melanie) and not Sonnet(donni, melanie) -> not Poetize(melanie, donni)\n\nImmix(donni, donni)\n\nforall x (Immix(x, sydney) and Lacking(sydney) -> Immix(x, donni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The caprice trifle the jennette. The caprice trifle the herculie. The caprice is horned. The caprice unclothe the jennette. The elton pouch the jennette. The elton pouch the herculie. The elton trifle the jennette. The elton trifle the herculie. The elton is horned. The elton is frail. The elton unclothe the caprice. The jennette is horned. The jennette unclothe the herculie. The herculie trifle the jennette. The herculie is acronymic. If something trifle the elton and the elton is childly then it trifle the caprice. If the caprice unclothe the herculie and the caprice trifle the elton then the caprice pouch the herculie. If something trifle the caprice and it does not chase the jennette then the caprice pouch the herculie. If something unclothe the herculie then the herculie trifle the caprice. If the jennette pouch the caprice then the jennette is not horned. If something pouch the herculie and the herculie trifle the caprice then the herculie unclothe the elton. If the herculie trifle the caprice and the herculie unclothe the elton then the elton is acronymic. If the herculie is childly and the caprice does not chase the herculie then the herculie does not need the caprice. The elton does not eat the caprice.", "logic": "\nTrifle(caprice, jennette)\nTrifle(caprice, herculie)\nHorned(caprice)\nUnclothe(caprice, jennette)\nPouch(elton, jennette)\nPouch(elton, herculie)\nTrifle(elton, jennette)\nTrifle(elton, herculie)\nHorned(elton)\nFrail(elton)\nUnclothe(elton, caprice)\nHorned(jennette)\nUnclothe(jennette, herculie)\nTrifle(herculie, jennette)\nAcronymic(herculie)\nforall x (Trifle(x, elton) and Childly(elton) -> Trifle(x, caprice))\nUnclothe(caprice, herculie) and Trifle(caprice, elton) -> Pouch(caprice, herculie)\nforall x (Trifle(x, caprice) and not Pouch(x, jennette) -> Pouch(caprice, herculie))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, herculie) -> Trifle(herculie, caprice))\nPouch(jennette, caprice) -> not Horned(jennette)\nforall x (Pouch(x, herculie) and Trifle(herculie, caprice) -> Unclothe(herculie, elton))\nTrifle(herculie, caprice) and Unclothe(herculie, elton) -> Acronymic(elton)\nChildly(herculie) and not Pouch(caprice, herculie) -> not Unclothe(herculie, caprice)\n\nnot Trifle(elton, caprice)\n\nforall x (Trifle(x, elton) and Childly(elton) -> Trifle(x, caprice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The sioux grit the willey. The sioux grit the april. The sioux is unvigilant. The sioux abash the willey. The flossi quiet the willey. The flossi quiet the april. The flossi grit the willey. The flossi grit the april. The flossi is unvigilant. The flossi is addled. The flossi abash the sioux. The willey is unvigilant. The willey abash the april. The april grit the willey. The april is monistic. If something grit the flossi and the flossi is eightfold then it grit the sioux. If the sioux abash the april and the sioux grit the flossi then the sioux quiet the april. If something grit the sioux and it does not chase the willey then the sioux quiet the april. If something abash the april then the april grit the sioux. If the willey quiet the sioux then the willey is not unvigilant. If something quiet the april and the april grit the sioux then the april abash the flossi. If the april grit the sioux and the april abash the flossi then the flossi is monistic. If the april is eightfold and the sioux does not chase the april then the april does not need the sioux. The sioux quiet the april.", "logic": "\nGrit(sioux, willey)\nGrit(sioux, april)\nUnvigilant(sioux)\nAbash(sioux, willey)\nQuiet(flossi, willey)\nQuiet(flossi, april)\nGrit(flossi, willey)\nGrit(flossi, april)\nUnvigilant(flossi)\nAddled(flossi)\nAbash(flossi, sioux)\nUnvigilant(willey)\nAbash(willey, april)\nGrit(april, willey)\nMonistic(april)\nforall x (Grit(x, flossi) and Eightfold(flossi) -> Grit(x, sioux))\nAbash(sioux, april) and Grit(sioux, flossi) -> Quiet(sioux, april)\nforall x (Grit(x, sioux) and not Quiet(x, willey) -> Quiet(sioux, april))\nforall x (Abash(x, april) -> Grit(april, sioux))\nQuiet(willey, sioux) -> not Unvigilant(willey)\nforall x (Quiet(x, april) and Grit(april, sioux) -> Abash(april, flossi))\nGrit(april, sioux) and Abash(april, flossi) -> Monistic(flossi)\nEightfold(april) and not Quiet(sioux, april) -> not Abash(april, sioux)\n\nQuiet(sioux, april)\n\nAbash(sioux, april) and Grit(sioux, flossi) -> Quiet(sioux, april) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The torrey wrawl the ursola. The torrey wrawl the rebeka. The torrey is helpless. The torrey rustle the ursola. The mimi pain the ursola. The mimi pain the rebeka. The mimi wrawl the ursola. The mimi wrawl the rebeka. The mimi is helpless. The mimi is rhythmic. The mimi rustle the torrey. The ursola is helpless. The ursola rustle the rebeka. The rebeka wrawl the ursola. The rebeka is ignored. If something wrawl the mimi and the mimi is branchless then it wrawl the torrey. If the torrey rustle the rebeka and the torrey wrawl the mimi then the torrey pain the rebeka. If something wrawl the torrey and it does not chase the ursola then the torrey pain the rebeka. If something rustle the rebeka then the rebeka wrawl the torrey. If the ursola pain the torrey then the ursola is not helpless. If something pain the rebeka and the rebeka wrawl the torrey then the rebeka rustle the mimi. If the rebeka wrawl the torrey and the rebeka rustle the mimi then the mimi is ignored. If the rebeka is branchless and the torrey does not chase the rebeka then the rebeka does not need the torrey. The torrey is not nice.", "logic": "\nWrawl(torrey, ursola)\nWrawl(torrey, rebeka)\nHelpless(torrey)\nRustle(torrey, ursola)\nPain(mimi, ursola)\nPain(mimi, rebeka)\nWrawl(mimi, ursola)\nWrawl(mimi, rebeka)\nHelpless(mimi)\nRhythmic(mimi)\nRustle(mimi, torrey)\nHelpless(ursola)\nRustle(ursola, rebeka)\nWrawl(rebeka, ursola)\nIgnored(rebeka)\nforall x (Wrawl(x, mimi) and Branchless(mimi) -> Wrawl(x, torrey))\nRustle(torrey, rebeka) and Wrawl(torrey, mimi) -> Pain(torrey, rebeka)\nforall x (Wrawl(x, torrey) and not Pain(x, ursola) -> Pain(torrey, rebeka))\nforall x (Rustle(x, rebeka) -> Wrawl(rebeka, torrey))\nPain(ursola, torrey) -> not Helpless(ursola)\nforall x (Pain(x, rebeka) and Wrawl(rebeka, torrey) -> Rustle(rebeka, mimi))\nWrawl(rebeka, torrey) and Rustle(rebeka, mimi) -> Ignored(mimi)\nBranchless(rebeka) and not Pain(torrey, rebeka) -> not Rustle(rebeka, torrey)\n\nnot Nice(torrey)\n\nnot Nice(torrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The duncan racket the abner. The duncan racket the halette. The duncan is enchanted. The duncan liquidise the abner. The juline enplane the abner. The juline enplane the halette. The juline racket the abner. The juline racket the halette. The juline is enchanted. The juline is innumerate. The juline liquidise the duncan. The abner is enchanted. The abner liquidise the halette. The halette racket the abner. The halette is endless. If something racket the juline and the juline is occluded then it racket the duncan. If the duncan liquidise the halette and the duncan racket the juline then the duncan enplane the halette. If something racket the duncan and it does not chase the abner then the duncan enplane the halette. If something liquidise the halette then the halette racket the duncan. If the abner enplane the duncan then the abner is not enchanted. If something enplane the halette and the halette racket the duncan then the halette liquidise the juline. If the halette racket the duncan and the halette liquidise the juline then the juline is endless. If the halette is occluded and the duncan does not chase the halette then the halette does not need the duncan. The duncan enplane the duncan.", "logic": "\nRacket(duncan, abner)\nRacket(duncan, halette)\nEnchanted(duncan)\nLiquidise(duncan, abner)\nEnplane(juline, abner)\nEnplane(juline, halette)\nRacket(juline, abner)\nRacket(juline, halette)\nEnchanted(juline)\nInnumerate(juline)\nLiquidise(juline, duncan)\nEnchanted(abner)\nLiquidise(abner, halette)\nRacket(halette, abner)\nEndless(halette)\nforall x (Racket(x, juline) and Occluded(juline) -> Racket(x, duncan))\nLiquidise(duncan, halette) and Racket(duncan, juline) -> Enplane(duncan, halette)\nforall x (Racket(x, duncan) and not Enplane(x, abner) -> Enplane(duncan, halette))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, halette) -> Racket(halette, duncan))\nEnplane(abner, duncan) -> not Enchanted(abner)\nforall x (Enplane(x, halette) and Racket(halette, duncan) -> Liquidise(halette, juline))\nRacket(halette, duncan) and Liquidise(halette, juline) -> Endless(juline)\nOccluded(halette) and not Enplane(duncan, halette) -> not Liquidise(halette, duncan)\n\nEnplane(duncan, duncan)\n\nEnplane(duncan, duncan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The bobina oxidize the hilde. The bobina oxidize the carin. The bobina is unlogical. The bobina welter the hilde. The solly uncork the hilde. The solly uncork the carin. The solly oxidize the hilde. The solly oxidize the carin. The solly is unlogical. The solly is bahai. The solly welter the bobina. The hilde is unlogical. The hilde welter the carin. The carin oxidize the hilde. The carin is gawky. If something oxidize the solly and the solly is leakproof then it oxidize the bobina. If the bobina welter the carin and the bobina oxidize the solly then the bobina uncork the carin. If something oxidize the bobina and it does not chase the hilde then the bobina uncork the carin. If something welter the carin then the carin oxidize the bobina. If the hilde uncork the bobina then the hilde is not unlogical. If something uncork the carin and the carin oxidize the bobina then the carin welter the solly. If the carin oxidize the bobina and the carin welter the solly then the solly is gawky. If the carin is leakproof and the bobina does not chase the carin then the carin does not need the bobina. The carin is not unlogical.", "logic": "\nOxidize(bobina, hilde)\nOxidize(bobina, carin)\nUnlogical(bobina)\nWelter(bobina, hilde)\nUncork(solly, hilde)\nUncork(solly, carin)\nOxidize(solly, hilde)\nOxidize(solly, carin)\nUnlogical(solly)\nBahai(solly)\nWelter(solly, bobina)\nUnlogical(hilde)\nWelter(hilde, carin)\nOxidize(carin, hilde)\nGawky(carin)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, solly) and Leakproof(solly) -> Oxidize(x, bobina))\nWelter(bobina, carin) and Oxidize(bobina, solly) -> Uncork(bobina, carin)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, bobina) and not Uncork(x, hilde) -> Uncork(bobina, carin))\nforall x (Welter(x, carin) -> Oxidize(carin, bobina))\nUncork(hilde, bobina) -> not Unlogical(hilde)\nforall x (Uncork(x, carin) and Oxidize(carin, bobina) -> Welter(carin, solly))\nOxidize(carin, bobina) and Welter(carin, solly) -> Gawky(solly)\nLeakproof(carin) and not Uncork(bobina, carin) -> not Welter(carin, bobina)\n\nnot Unlogical(carin)\n\nnot Unlogical(carin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The oleg snake the ethelbert. The oleg snake the piet. The oleg is heartfelt. The oleg laze the ethelbert. The sholom repose the ethelbert. The sholom repose the piet. The sholom snake the ethelbert. The sholom snake the piet. The sholom is heartfelt. The sholom is deist. The sholom laze the oleg. The ethelbert is heartfelt. The ethelbert laze the piet. The piet snake the ethelbert. The piet is pinioned. If something snake the sholom and the sholom is cxxxv then it snake the oleg. If the oleg laze the piet and the oleg snake the sholom then the oleg repose the piet. If something snake the oleg and it does not chase the ethelbert then the oleg repose the piet. If something laze the piet then the piet snake the oleg. If the ethelbert repose the oleg then the ethelbert is not heartfelt. If something repose the piet and the piet snake the oleg then the piet laze the sholom. If the piet snake the oleg and the piet laze the sholom then the sholom is pinioned. If the piet is cxxxv and the oleg does not chase the piet then the piet does not need the oleg. The piet repose the ethelbert.", "logic": "\nSnake(oleg, ethelbert)\nSnake(oleg, piet)\nHeartfelt(oleg)\nLaze(oleg, ethelbert)\nRepose(sholom, ethelbert)\nRepose(sholom, piet)\nSnake(sholom, ethelbert)\nSnake(sholom, piet)\nHeartfelt(sholom)\nDeist(sholom)\nLaze(sholom, oleg)\nHeartfelt(ethelbert)\nLaze(ethelbert, piet)\nSnake(piet, ethelbert)\nPinioned(piet)\nforall x (Snake(x, sholom) and Cxxxv(sholom) -> Snake(x, oleg))\nLaze(oleg, piet) and Snake(oleg, sholom) -> Repose(oleg, piet)\nforall x (Snake(x, oleg) and not Repose(x, ethelbert) -> Repose(oleg, piet))\nforall x (Laze(x, piet) -> Snake(piet, oleg))\nRepose(ethelbert, oleg) -> not Heartfelt(ethelbert)\nforall x (Repose(x, piet) and Snake(piet, oleg) -> Laze(piet, sholom))\nSnake(piet, oleg) and Laze(piet, sholom) -> Pinioned(sholom)\nCxxxv(piet) and not Repose(oleg, piet) -> not Laze(piet, oleg)\n\nRepose(piet, ethelbert)\n\nRepose(piet, ethelbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-937"} {"premises": "The arlee libel the rosabelle. The arlee retrench the rosabelle. The arlee retrench the kittie. The albertine does not eat the rosabelle. The albertine is external. The albertine retrench the rosabelle. The albertine retrench the kittie. The albertine target the kittie. The rosabelle is pacifist. The rosabelle is eternal. The rosabelle retrench the kittie. The rosabelle target the albertine. The rosabelle target the kittie. The kittie libel the arlee. The kittie is glorified. The kittie target the rosabelle. If something target the rosabelle and the rosabelle does not like the kittie then the rosabelle retrench the albertine. If the arlee is unhatched then the arlee retrench the rosabelle. The kittie libel the arlee.", "logic": "\nLibel(arlee, rosabelle)\nRetrench(arlee, rosabelle)\nRetrench(arlee, kittie)\nnot Libel(albertine, rosabelle)\nExternal(albertine)\nRetrench(albertine, rosabelle)\nRetrench(albertine, kittie)\nTarget(albertine, kittie)\nPacifist(rosabelle)\nEternal(rosabelle)\nRetrench(rosabelle, kittie)\nTarget(rosabelle, albertine)\nTarget(rosabelle, kittie)\nLibel(kittie, arlee)\nGlorified(kittie)\nTarget(kittie, rosabelle)\nforall x (Target(x, rosabelle) and not Retrench(rosabelle, kittie) -> Retrench(rosabelle, albertine))\nUnhatched(arlee) -> Retrench(arlee, rosabelle)\n\nLibel(kittie, arlee)\n\ntherefore Libel(kittie, arlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5959"} {"premises": "The cindra leaf the burt. The cindra preside the burt. The cindra preside the benita. The ruthe does not eat the burt. The ruthe is nicene. The ruthe preside the burt. The ruthe preside the benita. The ruthe typecast the benita. The burt is descendant. The burt is jungian. The burt preside the benita. The burt typecast the ruthe. The burt typecast the benita. The benita leaf the cindra. The benita is toothsome. The benita typecast the burt. If something typecast the burt and the burt does not like the benita then the burt preside the ruthe. If the cindra is biotypic then the cindra preside the burt. The benita does not need the burt.", "logic": "\nLeaf(cindra, burt)\nPreside(cindra, burt)\nPreside(cindra, benita)\nnot Leaf(ruthe, burt)\nNicene(ruthe)\nPreside(ruthe, burt)\nPreside(ruthe, benita)\nTypecast(ruthe, benita)\nDescendant(burt)\nJungian(burt)\nPreside(burt, benita)\nTypecast(burt, ruthe)\nTypecast(burt, benita)\nLeaf(benita, cindra)\nToothsome(benita)\nTypecast(benita, burt)\nforall x (Typecast(x, burt) and not Preside(burt, benita) -> Preside(burt, ruthe))\nBiotypic(cindra) -> Preside(cindra, burt)\n\nnot Typecast(benita, burt)\n\ntherefore Typecast(benita, burt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5959"} {"premises": "The evaleen refund the bettina. The evaleen inhibit the bettina. The evaleen inhibit the lucretia. The leland does not eat the bettina. The leland is jural. The leland inhibit the bettina. The leland inhibit the lucretia. The leland backtrack the lucretia. The bettina is posterior. The bettina is speakable. The bettina inhibit the lucretia. The bettina backtrack the leland. The bettina backtrack the lucretia. The lucretia refund the evaleen. The lucretia is dazzled. The lucretia backtrack the bettina. If something backtrack the bettina and the bettina does not like the lucretia then the bettina inhibit the leland. If the evaleen is congruent then the evaleen inhibit the bettina. The bettina does not like the leland.", "logic": "\nRefund(evaleen, bettina)\nInhibit(evaleen, bettina)\nInhibit(evaleen, lucretia)\nnot Refund(leland, bettina)\nJural(leland)\nInhibit(leland, bettina)\nInhibit(leland, lucretia)\nBacktrack(leland, lucretia)\nPosterior(bettina)\nSpeakable(bettina)\nInhibit(bettina, lucretia)\nBacktrack(bettina, leland)\nBacktrack(bettina, lucretia)\nRefund(lucretia, evaleen)\nDazzled(lucretia)\nBacktrack(lucretia, bettina)\nforall x (Backtrack(x, bettina) and not Inhibit(bettina, lucretia) -> Inhibit(bettina, leland))\nCongruent(evaleen) -> Inhibit(evaleen, bettina)\n\nnot Inhibit(bettina, leland)\n\nforall x (Backtrack(x, bettina) and not Inhibit(bettina, lucretia) -> Inhibit(bettina, leland)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5959"} {"premises": "The mariel cowhide the morgen. The mariel flute the morgen. The mariel flute the garnette. The cherish does not eat the morgen. The cherish is pondering. The cherish flute the morgen. The cherish flute the garnette. The cherish procreate the garnette. The morgen is omnivorous. The morgen is ratlike. The morgen flute the garnette. The morgen procreate the cherish. The morgen procreate the garnette. The garnette cowhide the mariel. The garnette is unmusical. The garnette procreate the morgen. If something procreate the morgen and the morgen does not like the garnette then the morgen flute the cherish. If the mariel is pernickety then the mariel flute the morgen. The morgen is pondering.", "logic": "\nCowhide(mariel, morgen)\nFlute(mariel, morgen)\nFlute(mariel, garnette)\nnot Cowhide(cherish, morgen)\nPondering(cherish)\nFlute(cherish, morgen)\nFlute(cherish, garnette)\nProcreate(cherish, garnette)\nOmnivorous(morgen)\nRatlike(morgen)\nFlute(morgen, garnette)\nProcreate(morgen, cherish)\nProcreate(morgen, garnette)\nCowhide(garnette, mariel)\nUnmusical(garnette)\nProcreate(garnette, morgen)\nforall x (Procreate(x, morgen) and not Flute(morgen, garnette) -> Flute(morgen, cherish))\nPernickety(mariel) -> Flute(mariel, morgen)\n\nPondering(morgen)\n\nPondering(morgen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5959"} {"premises": "Angelique is umbellar. Angelique is nubile. Angelique is cherished. Angelique is shallow. Angelique is parenteral. Salmon is umbellar. Salmon is yearly. Salmon is retiring. Salmon is nubile. Salmon is cherished. Salmon is shallow. Salmon is parenteral. Rudolfo is umbellar. Rudolfo is retiring. Rudolfo is cherished. Atlanta is nubile. If something is nubile then it is shallow. If something is shallow then it is umbellar. All umbellar things are retiring. Atlanta is nubile.", "logic": "\nUmbellar(angelique)\nNubile(angelique)\nCherished(angelique)\nShallow(angelique)\nParenteral(angelique)\nUmbellar(salmon)\nYearly(salmon)\nRetiring(salmon)\nNubile(salmon)\nCherished(salmon)\nShallow(salmon)\nParenteral(salmon)\nUmbellar(rudolfo)\nRetiring(rudolfo)\nCherished(rudolfo)\nNubile(atlanta)\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Shallow(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) -> Umbellar(x))\nforall x (Umbellar(x) -> Retiring(x))\n\nNubile(atlanta)\n\ntherefore Nubile(atlanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Rey is forceless. Rey is metacarpal. Rey is anagogical. Rey is expensive. Rey is deductible. Buddy is forceless. Buddy is returning. Buddy is corneal. Buddy is metacarpal. Buddy is anagogical. Buddy is expensive. Buddy is deductible. Bliss is forceless. Bliss is corneal. Bliss is anagogical. Davita is metacarpal. If something is metacarpal then it is expensive. If something is expensive then it is forceless. All forceless things are corneal. Bliss is not forceless.", "logic": "\nForceless(rey)\nMetacarpal(rey)\nAnagogical(rey)\nExpensive(rey)\nDeductible(rey)\nForceless(buddy)\nReturning(buddy)\nCorneal(buddy)\nMetacarpal(buddy)\nAnagogical(buddy)\nExpensive(buddy)\nDeductible(buddy)\nForceless(bliss)\nCorneal(bliss)\nAnagogical(bliss)\nMetacarpal(davita)\nforall x (Metacarpal(x) -> Expensive(x))\nforall x (Expensive(x) -> Forceless(x))\nforall x (Forceless(x) -> Corneal(x))\n\nnot Forceless(bliss)\n\ntherefore Forceless(bliss)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Orville is caller. Orville is myotonic. Orville is dreamy. Orville is icebound. Orville is unitarian. Clem is caller. Clem is sunstruck. Clem is untimbered. Clem is myotonic. Clem is dreamy. Clem is icebound. Clem is unitarian. Georgetta is caller. Georgetta is untimbered. Georgetta is dreamy. Lianne is myotonic. If something is myotonic then it is icebound. If something is icebound then it is caller. All caller things are untimbered. Lianne is icebound.", "logic": "\nCaller(orville)\nMyotonic(orville)\nDreamy(orville)\nIcebound(orville)\nUnitarian(orville)\nCaller(clem)\nSunstruck(clem)\nUntimbered(clem)\nMyotonic(clem)\nDreamy(clem)\nIcebound(clem)\nUnitarian(clem)\nCaller(georgetta)\nUntimbered(georgetta)\nDreamy(georgetta)\nMyotonic(lianne)\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Caller(x))\nforall x (Caller(x) -> Untimbered(x))\n\nIcebound(lianne)\n\nMyotonic(lianne) and forall x (Myotonic(x) -> Icebound(x)) -> therefore Icebound(lianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Kerianne is uncheerful. Kerianne is shambolic. Kerianne is rifled. Kerianne is giving. Kerianne is wilful. Alvira is uncheerful. Alvira is rudderless. Alvira is pernickety. Alvira is shambolic. Alvira is rifled. Alvira is giving. Alvira is wilful. Krishna is uncheerful. Krishna is pernickety. Krishna is rifled. Mada is shambolic. If something is shambolic then it is giving. If something is giving then it is uncheerful. All uncheerful things are pernickety. Kerianne is not pernickety.", "logic": "\nUncheerful(kerianne)\nShambolic(kerianne)\nRifled(kerianne)\nGiving(kerianne)\nWilful(kerianne)\nUncheerful(alvira)\nRudderless(alvira)\nPernickety(alvira)\nShambolic(alvira)\nRifled(alvira)\nGiving(alvira)\nWilful(alvira)\nUncheerful(krishna)\nPernickety(krishna)\nRifled(krishna)\nShambolic(mada)\nforall x (Shambolic(x) -> Giving(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\nforall x (Uncheerful(x) -> Pernickety(x))\n\nnot Pernickety(kerianne)\n\nUncheerful(kerianne) and forall x (Uncheerful(x) -> Pernickety(x)) -> therefore Pernickety(kerianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Irita is cresson. Irita is liveried. Irita is chary. Irita is ambulacral. Irita is jobless. Anja is cresson. Anja is reanimated. Anja is perpetual. Anja is liveried. Anja is chary. Anja is ambulacral. Anja is jobless. Meris is cresson. Meris is perpetual. Meris is chary. Ximenez is liveried. If something is liveried then it is ambulacral. If something is ambulacral then it is cresson. All cresson things are perpetual. Ximenez is cresson.", "logic": "\nCresson(irita)\nLiveried(irita)\nChary(irita)\nAmbulacral(irita)\nJobless(irita)\nCresson(anja)\nReanimated(anja)\nPerpetual(anja)\nLiveried(anja)\nChary(anja)\nAmbulacral(anja)\nJobless(anja)\nCresson(meris)\nPerpetual(meris)\nChary(meris)\nLiveried(ximenez)\nforall x (Liveried(x) -> Ambulacral(x))\nforall x (Ambulacral(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Cresson(x) -> Perpetual(x))\n\nCresson(ximenez)\n\nLiveried(ximenez) and forall x (Liveried(x) -> Ambulacral(x)) -> therefore Ambulacral(ximenez) Ambulacral(ximenez) and forall x (Ambulacral(x) -> Cresson(x)) -> therefore Cresson(ximenez)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Nance is retarded. Nance is antarctic. Nance is isotropic. Nance is untutored. Nance is addictive. Roice is retarded. Roice is maximising. Roice is snuggled. Roice is antarctic. Roice is isotropic. Roice is untutored. Roice is addictive. Audie is retarded. Audie is snuggled. Audie is isotropic. Troy is antarctic. If something is antarctic then it is untutored. If something is untutored then it is retarded. All retarded things are snuggled. Troy is not retarded.", "logic": "\nRetarded(nance)\nAntarctic(nance)\nIsotropic(nance)\nUntutored(nance)\nAddictive(nance)\nRetarded(roice)\nMaximising(roice)\nSnuggled(roice)\nAntarctic(roice)\nIsotropic(roice)\nUntutored(roice)\nAddictive(roice)\nRetarded(audie)\nSnuggled(audie)\nIsotropic(audie)\nAntarctic(troy)\nforall x (Antarctic(x) -> Untutored(x))\nforall x (Untutored(x) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Retarded(x) -> Snuggled(x))\n\nnot Retarded(troy)\n\nAntarctic(troy) and forall x (Antarctic(x) -> Untutored(x)) -> therefore Untutored(troy) Untutored(troy) and forall x (Untutored(x) -> Retarded(x)) -> therefore Retarded(troy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Tova is breathing. Tova is esthetic. Tova is gradable. Tova is sexed. Tova is gnomic. Sioux is breathing. Sioux is topless. Sioux is marshy. Sioux is esthetic. Sioux is gradable. Sioux is sexed. Sioux is gnomic. Malanie is breathing. Malanie is marshy. Malanie is gradable. Fleurette is esthetic. If something is esthetic then it is sexed. If something is sexed then it is breathing. All breathing things are marshy. Fleurette is marshy.", "logic": "\nBreathing(tova)\nEsthetic(tova)\nGradable(tova)\nSexed(tova)\nGnomic(tova)\nBreathing(sioux)\nTopless(sioux)\nMarshy(sioux)\nEsthetic(sioux)\nGradable(sioux)\nSexed(sioux)\nGnomic(sioux)\nBreathing(malanie)\nMarshy(malanie)\nGradable(malanie)\nEsthetic(fleurette)\nforall x (Esthetic(x) -> Sexed(x))\nforall x (Sexed(x) -> Breathing(x))\nforall x (Breathing(x) -> Marshy(x))\n\nMarshy(fleurette)\n\nEsthetic(fleurette) and forall x (Esthetic(x) -> Sexed(x)) -> therefore Sexed(fleurette) Sexed(fleurette) and forall x (Sexed(x) -> Breathing(x)) -> therefore Breathing(fleurette) Breathing(fleurette) and forall x (Breathing(x) -> Marshy(x)) -> therefore Marshy(fleurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Lemmie is backless. Lemmie is reedy. Lemmie is fourteenth. Lemmie is misused. Lemmie is awed. Jesse is backless. Jesse is right. Jesse is unproven. Jesse is reedy. Jesse is fourteenth. Jesse is misused. Jesse is awed. Kalvin is backless. Kalvin is unproven. Kalvin is fourteenth. Dulcy is reedy. If something is reedy then it is misused. If something is misused then it is backless. All backless things are unproven. Dulcy is not unproven.", "logic": "\nBackless(lemmie)\nReedy(lemmie)\nFourteenth(lemmie)\nMisused(lemmie)\nAwed(lemmie)\nBackless(jesse)\nRight(jesse)\nUnproven(jesse)\nReedy(jesse)\nFourteenth(jesse)\nMisused(jesse)\nAwed(jesse)\nBackless(kalvin)\nUnproven(kalvin)\nFourteenth(kalvin)\nReedy(dulcy)\nforall x (Reedy(x) -> Misused(x))\nforall x (Misused(x) -> Backless(x))\nforall x (Backless(x) -> Unproven(x))\n\nnot Unproven(dulcy)\n\nReedy(dulcy) and forall x (Reedy(x) -> Misused(x)) -> therefore Misused(dulcy) Misused(dulcy) and forall x (Misused(x) -> Backless(x)) -> therefore Backless(dulcy) Backless(dulcy) and forall x (Backless(x) -> Unproven(x)) -> therefore Unproven(dulcy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Rollin is profitable. Rollin is pouring. Rollin is shrinkable. Rollin is baboonish. Rollin is chelonian. Melicent is profitable. Melicent is first. Melicent is latent. Melicent is pouring. Melicent is shrinkable. Melicent is baboonish. Melicent is chelonian. Christin is profitable. Christin is latent. Christin is shrinkable. Charla is pouring. If something is pouring then it is baboonish. If something is baboonish then it is profitable. All profitable things are latent. Christin is not baboonish.", "logic": "\nProfitable(rollin)\nPouring(rollin)\nShrinkable(rollin)\nBaboonish(rollin)\nChelonian(rollin)\nProfitable(melicent)\nFirst(melicent)\nLatent(melicent)\nPouring(melicent)\nShrinkable(melicent)\nBaboonish(melicent)\nChelonian(melicent)\nProfitable(christin)\nLatent(christin)\nShrinkable(christin)\nPouring(charla)\nforall x (Pouring(x) -> Baboonish(x))\nforall x (Baboonish(x) -> Profitable(x))\nforall x (Profitable(x) -> Latent(x))\n\nnot Baboonish(christin)\n\nforall x (Pouring(x) -> Baboonish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Garold is stainless. Garold is absorbent. Garold is hoggish. Garold is pretended. Garold is unsporting. Verene is stainless. Verene is awed. Verene is apraxic. Verene is absorbent. Verene is hoggish. Verene is pretended. Verene is unsporting. Joete is stainless. Joete is apraxic. Joete is hoggish. Pamela is absorbent. If something is absorbent then it is pretended. If something is pretended then it is stainless. All stainless things are apraxic. Joete is awed.", "logic": "\nStainless(garold)\nAbsorbent(garold)\nHoggish(garold)\nPretended(garold)\nUnsporting(garold)\nStainless(verene)\nAwed(verene)\nApraxic(verene)\nAbsorbent(verene)\nHoggish(verene)\nPretended(verene)\nUnsporting(verene)\nStainless(joete)\nApraxic(joete)\nHoggish(joete)\nAbsorbent(pamela)\nforall x (Absorbent(x) -> Pretended(x))\nforall x (Pretended(x) -> Stainless(x))\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Apraxic(x))\n\nAwed(joete)\n\nAwed(joete) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Joseph is uninitiate. Joseph is patient. Joseph is bimetallic. Joseph is girlish. Joseph is bounden. Elfie is uninitiate. Elfie is irish. Elfie is financial. Elfie is patient. Elfie is bimetallic. Elfie is girlish. Elfie is bounden. Minny is uninitiate. Minny is financial. Minny is bimetallic. Viviana is patient. If something is patient then it is girlish. If something is girlish then it is uninitiate. All uninitiate things are financial. Viviana is not bimetallic.", "logic": "\nUninitiate(joseph)\nPatient(joseph)\nBimetallic(joseph)\nGirlish(joseph)\nBounden(joseph)\nUninitiate(elfie)\nIrish(elfie)\nFinancial(elfie)\nPatient(elfie)\nBimetallic(elfie)\nGirlish(elfie)\nBounden(elfie)\nUninitiate(minny)\nFinancial(minny)\nBimetallic(minny)\nPatient(viviana)\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Girlish(x))\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Financial(x))\n\nnot Bimetallic(viviana)\n\nnot Bimetallic(viviana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Yank is jobless. Yank is stewed. Yank is pavlovian. Yank is unowned. Yank is uptown. Charleton is jobless. Charleton is seraphic. Charleton is immediate. Charleton is stewed. Charleton is pavlovian. Charleton is unowned. Charleton is uptown. Tomkin is jobless. Tomkin is immediate. Tomkin is pavlovian. Jameson is stewed. If something is stewed then it is unowned. If something is unowned then it is jobless. All jobless things are immediate. Jameson is uptown.", "logic": "\nJobless(yank)\nStewed(yank)\nPavlovian(yank)\nUnowned(yank)\nUptown(yank)\nJobless(charleton)\nSeraphic(charleton)\nImmediate(charleton)\nStewed(charleton)\nPavlovian(charleton)\nUnowned(charleton)\nUptown(charleton)\nJobless(tomkin)\nImmediate(tomkin)\nPavlovian(tomkin)\nStewed(jameson)\nforall x (Stewed(x) -> Unowned(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Immediate(x))\n\nUptown(jameson)\n\nUptown(jameson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Adah is aeolian. Adah is insomniac. Adah is darkened. Adah is hirsute. Adah is fijian. Christyna is aeolian. Christyna is prismatic. Christyna is fatherly. Christyna is insomniac. Christyna is darkened. Christyna is hirsute. Christyna is fijian. Deonne is aeolian. Deonne is fatherly. Deonne is darkened. Wendi is insomniac. If something is insomniac then it is hirsute. If something is hirsute then it is aeolian. All aeolian things are fatherly. Wendi is not prismatic.", "logic": "\nAeolian(adah)\nInsomniac(adah)\nDarkened(adah)\nHirsute(adah)\nFijian(adah)\nAeolian(christyna)\nPrismatic(christyna)\nFatherly(christyna)\nInsomniac(christyna)\nDarkened(christyna)\nHirsute(christyna)\nFijian(christyna)\nAeolian(deonne)\nFatherly(deonne)\nDarkened(deonne)\nInsomniac(wendi)\nforall x (Insomniac(x) -> Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Hirsute(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Fatherly(x))\n\nnot Prismatic(wendi)\n\nnot Prismatic(wendi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Hilarie is ajar. Hilarie is acceptant. Hilarie is expressive. Hilarie is sloped. Hilarie is beauteous. Dahlia is ajar. Dahlia is cxxxv. Dahlia is rivalrous. Dahlia is acceptant. Dahlia is expressive. Dahlia is sloped. Dahlia is beauteous. Priscilla is ajar. Priscilla is rivalrous. Priscilla is expressive. Goldi is acceptant. If something is acceptant then it is sloped. If something is sloped then it is ajar. All ajar things are rivalrous. Priscilla is beauteous.", "logic": "\nAjar(hilarie)\nAcceptant(hilarie)\nExpressive(hilarie)\nSloped(hilarie)\nBeauteous(hilarie)\nAjar(dahlia)\nCxxxv(dahlia)\nRivalrous(dahlia)\nAcceptant(dahlia)\nExpressive(dahlia)\nSloped(dahlia)\nBeauteous(dahlia)\nAjar(priscilla)\nRivalrous(priscilla)\nExpressive(priscilla)\nAcceptant(goldi)\nforall x (Acceptant(x) -> Sloped(x))\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Ajar(x))\nforall x (Ajar(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\n\nBeauteous(priscilla)\n\nBeauteous(priscilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Scotti is clouded. Scotti is clawed. Scotti is puerile. Scotti is ethiopian. Scotti is irrational. Morris is clouded. Morris is basipetal. Morris is flossy. Morris is clawed. Morris is puerile. Morris is ethiopian. Morris is irrational. Darell is clouded. Darell is flossy. Darell is puerile. Carmelina is clawed. If something is clawed then it is ethiopian. If something is ethiopian then it is clouded. All clouded things are flossy. Scotti is not basipetal.", "logic": "\nClouded(scotti)\nClawed(scotti)\nPuerile(scotti)\nEthiopian(scotti)\nIrrational(scotti)\nClouded(morris)\nBasipetal(morris)\nFlossy(morris)\nClawed(morris)\nPuerile(morris)\nEthiopian(morris)\nIrrational(morris)\nClouded(darell)\nFlossy(darell)\nPuerile(darell)\nClawed(carmelina)\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Flossy(x))\n\nnot Basipetal(scotti)\n\nnot Basipetal(scotti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "Patin is bilious. Patin is carolean. Patin is roughened. Patin is bibbed. Patin is crappy. Joete is bilious. Joete is ticklish. Joete is potential. Joete is carolean. Joete is roughened. Joete is bibbed. Joete is crappy. Pam is bilious. Pam is potential. Pam is roughened. Leeanne is carolean. If something is carolean then it is bibbed. If something is bibbed then it is bilious. All bilious things are potential. Pam is carolean.", "logic": "\nBilious(patin)\nCarolean(patin)\nRoughened(patin)\nBibbed(patin)\nCrappy(patin)\nBilious(joete)\nTicklish(joete)\nPotential(joete)\nCarolean(joete)\nRoughened(joete)\nBibbed(joete)\nCrappy(joete)\nBilious(pam)\nPotential(pam)\nRoughened(pam)\nCarolean(leeanne)\nforall x (Carolean(x) -> Bibbed(x))\nforall x (Bibbed(x) -> Bilious(x))\nforall x (Bilious(x) -> Potential(x))\n\nCarolean(pam)\n\nCarolean(pam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-225"} {"premises": "The humbert queer the christan. The humbert is focused. The humbert is rotated. The humbert alkalinize the christan. The humbert plane the christan. The christan queer the humbert. The christan is focused. The christan is dread. The christan is rotated. The christan plane the humbert. If something plane the humbert and it alkalinize the humbert then it plane the christan. If something is dread then it alkalinize the christan. If something plane the humbert then it is focused. If the christan plane the humbert and the christan alkalinize the humbert then the christan is scurfy. If something alkalinize the christan then it alkalinize the humbert. If something is rotated then it queer the christan. The christan is rotated.", "logic": "\nQueer(humbert, christan)\nFocused(humbert)\nRotated(humbert)\nAlkalinize(humbert, christan)\nPlane(humbert, christan)\nQueer(christan, humbert)\nFocused(christan)\nDread(christan)\nRotated(christan)\nPlane(christan, humbert)\nforall x (Plane(x, humbert) and Alkalinize(x, humbert) -> Plane(x, christan))\nforall x (Dread(x) -> Alkalinize(x, christan))\nforall x (Plane(x, humbert) -> Focused(x))\nPlane(christan, humbert) and Alkalinize(christan, humbert) -> Scurfy(christan)\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, christan) -> Alkalinize(x, humbert))\nforall x (Rotated(x) -> Queer(x, christan))\n\nRotated(christan)\n\ntherefore Rotated(christan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The mauricio retail the eduardo. The mauricio is hatted. The mauricio is lighted. The mauricio scrag the eduardo. The mauricio aestivate the eduardo. The eduardo retail the mauricio. The eduardo is hatted. The eduardo is eroded. The eduardo is lighted. The eduardo aestivate the mauricio. If something aestivate the mauricio and it scrag the mauricio then it aestivate the eduardo. If something is eroded then it scrag the eduardo. If something aestivate the mauricio then it is hatted. If the eduardo aestivate the mauricio and the eduardo scrag the mauricio then the eduardo is xxvi. If something scrag the eduardo then it scrag the mauricio. If something is lighted then it retail the eduardo. The mauricio does not see the eduardo.", "logic": "\nRetail(mauricio, eduardo)\nHatted(mauricio)\nLighted(mauricio)\nScrag(mauricio, eduardo)\nAestivate(mauricio, eduardo)\nRetail(eduardo, mauricio)\nHatted(eduardo)\nEroded(eduardo)\nLighted(eduardo)\nAestivate(eduardo, mauricio)\nforall x (Aestivate(x, mauricio) and Scrag(x, mauricio) -> Aestivate(x, eduardo))\nforall x (Eroded(x) -> Scrag(x, eduardo))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, mauricio) -> Hatted(x))\nAestivate(eduardo, mauricio) and Scrag(eduardo, mauricio) -> Xxvi(eduardo)\nforall x (Scrag(x, eduardo) -> Scrag(x, mauricio))\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Retail(x, eduardo))\n\nnot Aestivate(mauricio, eduardo)\n\ntherefore Aestivate(mauricio, eduardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The dayna skydive the elsa. The dayna is jesuitical. The dayna is mucosal. The dayna invalid the elsa. The dayna autograph the elsa. The elsa skydive the dayna. The elsa is jesuitical. The elsa is senior. The elsa is mucosal. The elsa autograph the dayna. If something autograph the dayna and it invalid the dayna then it autograph the elsa. If something is senior then it invalid the elsa. If something autograph the dayna then it is jesuitical. If the elsa autograph the dayna and the elsa invalid the dayna then the elsa is apelike. If something invalid the elsa then it invalid the dayna. If something is mucosal then it skydive the elsa. The elsa invalid the elsa.", "logic": "\nSkydive(dayna, elsa)\nJesuitical(dayna)\nMucosal(dayna)\nInvalid(dayna, elsa)\nAutograph(dayna, elsa)\nSkydive(elsa, dayna)\nJesuitical(elsa)\nSenior(elsa)\nMucosal(elsa)\nAutograph(elsa, dayna)\nforall x (Autograph(x, dayna) and Invalid(x, dayna) -> Autograph(x, elsa))\nforall x (Senior(x) -> Invalid(x, elsa))\nforall x (Autograph(x, dayna) -> Jesuitical(x))\nAutograph(elsa, dayna) and Invalid(elsa, dayna) -> Apelike(elsa)\nforall x (Invalid(x, elsa) -> Invalid(x, dayna))\nforall x (Mucosal(x) -> Skydive(x, elsa))\n\nInvalid(elsa, elsa)\n\nSenior(elsa) and forall x (Senior(x) -> Invalid(x, elsa)) -> therefore Invalid(elsa, elsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The tuckie carburize the antone. The tuckie is gambian. The tuckie is slavic. The tuckie hunt the antone. The tuckie crossruff the antone. The antone carburize the tuckie. The antone is gambian. The antone is prepared. The antone is slavic. The antone crossruff the tuckie. If something crossruff the tuckie and it hunt the tuckie then it crossruff the antone. If something is prepared then it hunt the antone. If something crossruff the tuckie then it is gambian. If the antone crossruff the tuckie and the antone hunt the tuckie then the antone is bimodal. If something hunt the antone then it hunt the tuckie. If something is slavic then it carburize the antone. The antone does not need the antone.", "logic": "\nCarburize(tuckie, antone)\nGambian(tuckie)\nSlavic(tuckie)\nHunt(tuckie, antone)\nCrossruff(tuckie, antone)\nCarburize(antone, tuckie)\nGambian(antone)\nPrepared(antone)\nSlavic(antone)\nCrossruff(antone, tuckie)\nforall x (Crossruff(x, tuckie) and Hunt(x, tuckie) -> Crossruff(x, antone))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Hunt(x, antone))\nforall x (Crossruff(x, tuckie) -> Gambian(x))\nCrossruff(antone, tuckie) and Hunt(antone, tuckie) -> Bimodal(antone)\nforall x (Hunt(x, antone) -> Hunt(x, tuckie))\nforall x (Slavic(x) -> Carburize(x, antone))\n\nnot Hunt(antone, antone)\n\nPrepared(antone) and forall x (Prepared(x) -> Hunt(x, antone)) -> therefore Hunt(antone, antone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The giselle equalise the yankee. The giselle is stenosed. The giselle is cerulean. The giselle negociate the yankee. The giselle wheeze the yankee. The yankee equalise the giselle. The yankee is stenosed. The yankee is keyed. The yankee is cerulean. The yankee wheeze the giselle. If something wheeze the giselle and it negociate the giselle then it wheeze the yankee. If something is keyed then it negociate the yankee. If something wheeze the giselle then it is stenosed. If the yankee wheeze the giselle and the yankee negociate the giselle then the yankee is jovian. If something negociate the yankee then it negociate the giselle. If something is cerulean then it equalise the yankee. The yankee negociate the giselle.", "logic": "\nEqualise(giselle, yankee)\nStenosed(giselle)\nCerulean(giselle)\nNegociate(giselle, yankee)\nWheeze(giselle, yankee)\nEqualise(yankee, giselle)\nStenosed(yankee)\nKeyed(yankee)\nCerulean(yankee)\nWheeze(yankee, giselle)\nforall x (Wheeze(x, giselle) and Negociate(x, giselle) -> Wheeze(x, yankee))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Negociate(x, yankee))\nforall x (Wheeze(x, giselle) -> Stenosed(x))\nWheeze(yankee, giselle) and Negociate(yankee, giselle) -> Jovian(yankee)\nforall x (Negociate(x, yankee) -> Negociate(x, giselle))\nforall x (Cerulean(x) -> Equalise(x, yankee))\n\nNegociate(yankee, giselle)\n\nKeyed(yankee) and forall x (Keyed(x) -> Negociate(x, yankee)) -> therefore Negociate(yankee, yankee) Negociate(yankee, yankee) and forall x (Negociate(x, yankee) -> Negociate(x, giselle)) -> therefore Negociate(yankee, giselle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The marten postpose the denys. The marten is salable. The marten is revertible. The marten unhitch the denys. The marten pressure the denys. The denys postpose the marten. The denys is salable. The denys is scriptural. The denys is revertible. The denys pressure the marten. If something pressure the marten and it unhitch the marten then it pressure the denys. If something is scriptural then it unhitch the denys. If something pressure the marten then it is salable. If the denys pressure the marten and the denys unhitch the marten then the denys is tricky. If something unhitch the denys then it unhitch the marten. If something is revertible then it postpose the denys. The denys does not need the marten.", "logic": "\nPostpose(marten, denys)\nSalable(marten)\nRevertible(marten)\nUnhitch(marten, denys)\nPressure(marten, denys)\nPostpose(denys, marten)\nSalable(denys)\nScriptural(denys)\nRevertible(denys)\nPressure(denys, marten)\nforall x (Pressure(x, marten) and Unhitch(x, marten) -> Pressure(x, denys))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) -> Unhitch(x, denys))\nforall x (Pressure(x, marten) -> Salable(x))\nPressure(denys, marten) and Unhitch(denys, marten) -> Tricky(denys)\nforall x (Unhitch(x, denys) -> Unhitch(x, marten))\nforall x (Revertible(x) -> Postpose(x, denys))\n\nnot Unhitch(denys, marten)\n\nScriptural(denys) and forall x (Scriptural(x) -> Unhitch(x, denys)) -> therefore Unhitch(denys, denys) Unhitch(denys, denys) and forall x (Unhitch(x, denys) -> Unhitch(x, marten)) -> therefore Unhitch(denys, marten)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The skipp canvas the nanon. The skipp is specular. The skipp is candescent. The skipp embattle the nanon. The skipp optimise the nanon. The nanon canvas the skipp. The nanon is specular. The nanon is lonesome. The nanon is candescent. The nanon optimise the skipp. If something optimise the skipp and it embattle the skipp then it optimise the nanon. If something is lonesome then it embattle the nanon. If something optimise the skipp then it is specular. If the nanon optimise the skipp and the nanon embattle the skipp then the nanon is hymenal. If something embattle the nanon then it embattle the skipp. If something is candescent then it canvas the nanon. The nanon optimise the nanon.", "logic": "\nCanvas(skipp, nanon)\nSpecular(skipp)\nCandescent(skipp)\nEmbattle(skipp, nanon)\nOptimise(skipp, nanon)\nCanvas(nanon, skipp)\nSpecular(nanon)\nLonesome(nanon)\nCandescent(nanon)\nOptimise(nanon, skipp)\nforall x (Optimise(x, skipp) and Embattle(x, skipp) -> Optimise(x, nanon))\nforall x (Lonesome(x) -> Embattle(x, nanon))\nforall x (Optimise(x, skipp) -> Specular(x))\nOptimise(nanon, skipp) and Embattle(nanon, skipp) -> Hymenal(nanon)\nforall x (Embattle(x, nanon) -> Embattle(x, skipp))\nforall x (Candescent(x) -> Canvas(x, nanon))\n\nOptimise(nanon, nanon)\n\nLonesome(nanon) and forall x (Lonesome(x) -> Embattle(x, nanon)) -> therefore Embattle(nanon, nanon) Embattle(nanon, nanon) and forall x (Embattle(x, nanon) -> Embattle(x, skipp)) -> therefore Embattle(nanon, skipp) Optimise(nanon, skipp) and Embattle(nanon, skipp) and forall x (Optimise(x, skipp) and Embattle(x, skipp) -> Optimise(x, nanon)) -> therefore Optimise(nanon, nanon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The deloria divide the abel. The deloria is lavender. The deloria is capsulated. The deloria alkalify the abel. The deloria expurgate the abel. The abel divide the deloria. The abel is lavender. The abel is julian. The abel is capsulated. The abel expurgate the deloria. If something expurgate the deloria and it alkalify the deloria then it expurgate the abel. If something is julian then it alkalify the abel. If something expurgate the deloria then it is lavender. If the abel expurgate the deloria and the abel alkalify the deloria then the abel is worsened. If something alkalify the abel then it alkalify the deloria. If something is capsulated then it divide the abel. The abel does not see the abel.", "logic": "\nDivide(deloria, abel)\nLavender(deloria)\nCapsulated(deloria)\nAlkalify(deloria, abel)\nExpurgate(deloria, abel)\nDivide(abel, deloria)\nLavender(abel)\nJulian(abel)\nCapsulated(abel)\nExpurgate(abel, deloria)\nforall x (Expurgate(x, deloria) and Alkalify(x, deloria) -> Expurgate(x, abel))\nforall x (Julian(x) -> Alkalify(x, abel))\nforall x (Expurgate(x, deloria) -> Lavender(x))\nExpurgate(abel, deloria) and Alkalify(abel, deloria) -> Worsened(abel)\nforall x (Alkalify(x, abel) -> Alkalify(x, deloria))\nforall x (Capsulated(x) -> Divide(x, abel))\n\nnot Expurgate(abel, abel)\n\nJulian(abel) and forall x (Julian(x) -> Alkalify(x, abel)) -> therefore Alkalify(abel, abel) Alkalify(abel, abel) and forall x (Alkalify(x, abel) -> Alkalify(x, deloria)) -> therefore Alkalify(abel, deloria) Expurgate(abel, deloria) and Alkalify(abel, deloria) and forall x (Expurgate(x, deloria) and Alkalify(x, deloria) -> Expurgate(x, abel)) -> therefore Expurgate(abel, abel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The ameline french the steffane. The ameline is ageing. The ameline is expansile. The ameline benficiate the steffane. The ameline alight the steffane. The steffane french the ameline. The steffane is ageing. The steffane is canted. The steffane is expansile. The steffane alight the ameline. If something alight the ameline and it benficiate the ameline then it alight the steffane. If something is canted then it benficiate the steffane. If something alight the ameline then it is ageing. If the steffane alight the ameline and the steffane benficiate the ameline then the steffane is arrayed. If something benficiate the steffane then it benficiate the ameline. If something is expansile then it french the steffane. The steffane is not kind.", "logic": "\nFrench(ameline, steffane)\nAgeing(ameline)\nExpansile(ameline)\nBenficiate(ameline, steffane)\nAlight(ameline, steffane)\nFrench(steffane, ameline)\nAgeing(steffane)\nCanted(steffane)\nExpansile(steffane)\nAlight(steffane, ameline)\nforall x (Alight(x, ameline) and Benficiate(x, ameline) -> Alight(x, steffane))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Benficiate(x, steffane))\nforall x (Alight(x, ameline) -> Ageing(x))\nAlight(steffane, ameline) and Benficiate(steffane, ameline) -> Arrayed(steffane)\nforall x (Benficiate(x, steffane) -> Benficiate(x, ameline))\nforall x (Expansile(x) -> French(x, steffane))\n\nnot Kind(steffane)\n\nnot Kind(steffane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The kathi bespeckle the gearard. The kathi is answering. The kathi is afeared. The kathi refurnish the gearard. The kathi dine the gearard. The gearard bespeckle the kathi. The gearard is answering. The gearard is jihadi. The gearard is afeared. The gearard dine the kathi. If something dine the kathi and it refurnish the kathi then it dine the gearard. If something is jihadi then it refurnish the gearard. If something dine the kathi then it is answering. If the gearard dine the kathi and the gearard refurnish the kathi then the gearard is placental. If something refurnish the gearard then it refurnish the kathi. If something is afeared then it bespeckle the gearard. The kathi is placental.", "logic": "\nBespeckle(kathi, gearard)\nAnswering(kathi)\nAfeared(kathi)\nRefurnish(kathi, gearard)\nDine(kathi, gearard)\nBespeckle(gearard, kathi)\nAnswering(gearard)\nJihadi(gearard)\nAfeared(gearard)\nDine(gearard, kathi)\nforall x (Dine(x, kathi) and Refurnish(x, kathi) -> Dine(x, gearard))\nforall x (Jihadi(x) -> Refurnish(x, gearard))\nforall x (Dine(x, kathi) -> Answering(x))\nDine(gearard, kathi) and Refurnish(gearard, kathi) -> Placental(gearard)\nforall x (Refurnish(x, gearard) -> Refurnish(x, kathi))\nforall x (Afeared(x) -> Bespeckle(x, gearard))\n\nPlacental(kathi)\n\nPlacental(kathi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The adair couple the jamie. The adair is reasonless. The adair is moralistic. The adair readapt the jamie. The adair glamorise the jamie. The jamie couple the adair. The jamie is reasonless. The jamie is avowed. The jamie is moralistic. The jamie glamorise the adair. If something glamorise the adair and it readapt the adair then it glamorise the jamie. If something is avowed then it readapt the jamie. If something glamorise the adair then it is reasonless. If the jamie glamorise the adair and the jamie readapt the adair then the jamie is crossed. If something readapt the jamie then it readapt the adair. If something is moralistic then it couple the jamie. The adair does not see the adair.", "logic": "\nCouple(adair, jamie)\nReasonless(adair)\nMoralistic(adair)\nReadapt(adair, jamie)\nGlamorise(adair, jamie)\nCouple(jamie, adair)\nReasonless(jamie)\nAvowed(jamie)\nMoralistic(jamie)\nGlamorise(jamie, adair)\nforall x (Glamorise(x, adair) and Readapt(x, adair) -> Glamorise(x, jamie))\nforall x (Avowed(x) -> Readapt(x, jamie))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, adair) -> Reasonless(x))\nGlamorise(jamie, adair) and Readapt(jamie, adair) -> Crossed(jamie)\nforall x (Readapt(x, jamie) -> Readapt(x, adair))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Couple(x, jamie))\n\nnot Glamorise(adair, adair)\n\nnot Glamorise(adair, adair) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The claire mummify the truda. The claire is finished. The claire is ergotic. The claire redirect the truda. The claire connote the truda. The truda mummify the claire. The truda is finished. The truda is haggard. The truda is ergotic. The truda connote the claire. If something connote the claire and it redirect the claire then it connote the truda. If something is haggard then it redirect the truda. If something connote the claire then it is finished. If the truda connote the claire and the truda redirect the claire then the truda is funerary. If something redirect the truda then it redirect the claire. If something is ergotic then it mummify the truda. The claire is haggard.", "logic": "\nMummify(claire, truda)\nFinished(claire)\nErgotic(claire)\nRedirect(claire, truda)\nConnote(claire, truda)\nMummify(truda, claire)\nFinished(truda)\nHaggard(truda)\nErgotic(truda)\nConnote(truda, claire)\nforall x (Connote(x, claire) and Redirect(x, claire) -> Connote(x, truda))\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Redirect(x, truda))\nforall x (Connote(x, claire) -> Finished(x))\nConnote(truda, claire) and Redirect(truda, claire) -> Funerary(truda)\nforall x (Redirect(x, truda) -> Redirect(x, claire))\nforall x (Ergotic(x) -> Mummify(x, truda))\n\nHaggard(claire)\n\nHaggard(claire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The annabelle unleash the lark. The annabelle is punishing. The annabelle is aguish. The annabelle obtrude the lark. The annabelle neighbor the lark. The lark unleash the annabelle. The lark is punishing. The lark is offstage. The lark is aguish. The lark neighbor the annabelle. If something neighbor the annabelle and it obtrude the annabelle then it neighbor the lark. If something is offstage then it obtrude the lark. If something neighbor the annabelle then it is punishing. If the lark neighbor the annabelle and the lark obtrude the annabelle then the lark is crude. If something obtrude the lark then it obtrude the annabelle. If something is aguish then it unleash the lark. The annabelle is not kind.", "logic": "\nUnleash(annabelle, lark)\nPunishing(annabelle)\nAguish(annabelle)\nObtrude(annabelle, lark)\nNeighbor(annabelle, lark)\nUnleash(lark, annabelle)\nPunishing(lark)\nOffstage(lark)\nAguish(lark)\nNeighbor(lark, annabelle)\nforall x (Neighbor(x, annabelle) and Obtrude(x, annabelle) -> Neighbor(x, lark))\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Obtrude(x, lark))\nforall x (Neighbor(x, annabelle) -> Punishing(x))\nNeighbor(lark, annabelle) and Obtrude(lark, annabelle) -> Crude(lark)\nforall x (Obtrude(x, lark) -> Obtrude(x, annabelle))\nforall x (Aguish(x) -> Unleash(x, lark))\n\nnot Kind(annabelle)\n\nnot Kind(annabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The abelard keratinise the lindie. The abelard is unrevised. The abelard is overshot. The abelard cord the lindie. The abelard backpedal the lindie. The lindie keratinise the abelard. The lindie is unrevised. The lindie is swank. The lindie is overshot. The lindie backpedal the abelard. If something backpedal the abelard and it cord the abelard then it backpedal the lindie. If something is swank then it cord the lindie. If something backpedal the abelard then it is unrevised. If the lindie backpedal the abelard and the lindie cord the abelard then the lindie is imposed. If something cord the lindie then it cord the abelard. If something is overshot then it keratinise the lindie. The abelard keratinise the abelard.", "logic": "\nKeratinise(abelard, lindie)\nUnrevised(abelard)\nOvershot(abelard)\nCord(abelard, lindie)\nBackpedal(abelard, lindie)\nKeratinise(lindie, abelard)\nUnrevised(lindie)\nSwank(lindie)\nOvershot(lindie)\nBackpedal(lindie, abelard)\nforall x (Backpedal(x, abelard) and Cord(x, abelard) -> Backpedal(x, lindie))\nforall x (Swank(x) -> Cord(x, lindie))\nforall x (Backpedal(x, abelard) -> Unrevised(x))\nBackpedal(lindie, abelard) and Cord(lindie, abelard) -> Imposed(lindie)\nforall x (Cord(x, lindie) -> Cord(x, abelard))\nforall x (Overshot(x) -> Keratinise(x, lindie))\n\nKeratinise(abelard, abelard)\n\nKeratinise(abelard, abelard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-613"} {"premises": "The elsinore fetch the reuven. The elsinore infatuate the reuven. The elsinore telescope the amata. The amata fetch the elsinore. The amata is parttime. The amata does not visit the reuven. The reuven does not chase the elsinore. The reuven is insured. The reuven is parttime. The reuven does not visit the amata. If someone infatuate the reuven then the reuven infatuate the amata. If the amata infatuate the reuven then the reuven telescope the elsinore. If someone infatuate the amata then the amata telescope the elsinore. If someone fetch the elsinore then they do not eat the amata. If someone fetch the elsinore and the elsinore does not visit the reuven then the elsinore telescope the amata. If someone telescope the elsinore then the elsinore is not parttime. The elsinore fetch the reuven.", "logic": "\nFetch(elsinore, reuven)\nInfatuate(elsinore, reuven)\nTelescope(elsinore, amata)\nFetch(amata, elsinore)\nParttime(amata)\nnot Telescope(amata, reuven)\nnot Fetch(reuven, elsinore)\nInsured(reuven)\nParttime(reuven)\nnot Telescope(reuven, amata)\nforall x (Infatuate(x, reuven) -> Infatuate(reuven, amata))\nInfatuate(amata, reuven) -> Telescope(reuven, elsinore)\nforall x (Infatuate(x, amata) -> Telescope(amata, elsinore))\nforall x (Fetch(x, elsinore) -> not Infatuate(x, amata))\nforall x (Fetch(x, elsinore) and not Telescope(elsinore, reuven) -> Telescope(elsinore, amata))\nforall x (Telescope(x, elsinore) -> not Parttime(elsinore))\n\nFetch(elsinore, reuven)\n\ntherefore Fetch(elsinore, reuven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The ardene register the garv. The ardene monitor the garv. The ardene animadvert the stormie. The stormie register the ardene. The stormie is villainous. The stormie does not visit the garv. The garv does not chase the ardene. The garv is turgid. The garv is villainous. The garv does not visit the stormie. If someone monitor the garv then the garv monitor the stormie. If the stormie monitor the garv then the garv animadvert the ardene. If someone monitor the stormie then the stormie animadvert the ardene. If someone register the ardene then they do not eat the stormie. If someone register the ardene and the ardene does not visit the garv then the ardene animadvert the stormie. If someone animadvert the ardene then the ardene is not villainous. The ardene does not visit the stormie.", "logic": "\nRegister(ardene, garv)\nMonitor(ardene, garv)\nAnimadvert(ardene, stormie)\nRegister(stormie, ardene)\nVillainous(stormie)\nnot Animadvert(stormie, garv)\nnot Register(garv, ardene)\nTurgid(garv)\nVillainous(garv)\nnot Animadvert(garv, stormie)\nforall x (Monitor(x, garv) -> Monitor(garv, stormie))\nMonitor(stormie, garv) -> Animadvert(garv, ardene)\nforall x (Monitor(x, stormie) -> Animadvert(stormie, ardene))\nforall x (Register(x, ardene) -> not Monitor(x, stormie))\nforall x (Register(x, ardene) and not Animadvert(ardene, garv) -> Animadvert(ardene, stormie))\nforall x (Animadvert(x, ardene) -> not Villainous(ardene))\n\nnot Animadvert(ardene, stormie)\n\ntherefore Animadvert(ardene, stormie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The tuck foal the angelico. The tuck groan the angelico. The tuck rasterize the alysia. The alysia foal the tuck. The alysia is cognisant. The alysia does not visit the angelico. The angelico does not chase the tuck. The angelico is pyknotic. The angelico is cognisant. The angelico does not visit the alysia. If someone groan the angelico then the angelico groan the alysia. If the alysia groan the angelico then the angelico rasterize the tuck. If someone groan the alysia then the alysia rasterize the tuck. If someone foal the tuck then they do not eat the alysia. If someone foal the tuck and the tuck does not visit the angelico then the tuck rasterize the alysia. If someone rasterize the tuck then the tuck is not cognisant. The angelico groan the alysia.", "logic": "\nFoal(tuck, angelico)\nGroan(tuck, angelico)\nRasterize(tuck, alysia)\nFoal(alysia, tuck)\nCognisant(alysia)\nnot Rasterize(alysia, angelico)\nnot Foal(angelico, tuck)\nPyknotic(angelico)\nCognisant(angelico)\nnot Rasterize(angelico, alysia)\nforall x (Groan(x, angelico) -> Groan(angelico, alysia))\nGroan(alysia, angelico) -> Rasterize(angelico, tuck)\nforall x (Groan(x, alysia) -> Rasterize(alysia, tuck))\nforall x (Foal(x, tuck) -> not Groan(x, alysia))\nforall x (Foal(x, tuck) and not Rasterize(tuck, angelico) -> Rasterize(tuck, alysia))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, tuck) -> not Cognisant(tuck))\n\nGroan(angelico, alysia)\n\nGroan(tuck, angelico) and forall x (Groan(x, angelico) -> Groan(angelico, alysia)) -> therefore Groan(angelico, alysia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The charlton exercise the almeda. The charlton huckster the almeda. The charlton allegorise the walton. The walton exercise the charlton. The walton is disturbed. The walton does not visit the almeda. The almeda does not chase the charlton. The almeda is unexpected. The almeda is disturbed. The almeda does not visit the walton. If someone huckster the almeda then the almeda huckster the walton. If the walton huckster the almeda then the almeda allegorise the charlton. If someone huckster the walton then the walton allegorise the charlton. If someone exercise the charlton then they do not eat the walton. If someone exercise the charlton and the charlton does not visit the almeda then the charlton allegorise the walton. If someone allegorise the charlton then the charlton is not disturbed. The almeda does not eat the walton.", "logic": "\nExercise(charlton, almeda)\nHuckster(charlton, almeda)\nAllegorise(charlton, walton)\nExercise(walton, charlton)\nDisturbed(walton)\nnot Allegorise(walton, almeda)\nnot Exercise(almeda, charlton)\nUnexpected(almeda)\nDisturbed(almeda)\nnot Allegorise(almeda, walton)\nforall x (Huckster(x, almeda) -> Huckster(almeda, walton))\nHuckster(walton, almeda) -> Allegorise(almeda, charlton)\nforall x (Huckster(x, walton) -> Allegorise(walton, charlton))\nforall x (Exercise(x, charlton) -> not Huckster(x, walton))\nforall x (Exercise(x, charlton) and not Allegorise(charlton, almeda) -> Allegorise(charlton, walton))\nforall x (Allegorise(x, charlton) -> not Disturbed(charlton))\n\nnot Huckster(almeda, walton)\n\nHuckster(charlton, almeda) and forall x (Huckster(x, almeda) -> Huckster(almeda, walton)) -> therefore Huckster(almeda, walton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The gertrud latch the ursa. The gertrud jest the ursa. The gertrud hobble the venus. The venus latch the gertrud. The venus is mute. The venus does not visit the ursa. The ursa does not chase the gertrud. The ursa is iambic. The ursa is mute. The ursa does not visit the venus. If someone jest the ursa then the ursa jest the venus. If the venus jest the ursa then the ursa hobble the gertrud. If someone jest the venus then the venus hobble the gertrud. If someone latch the gertrud then they do not eat the venus. If someone latch the gertrud and the gertrud does not visit the ursa then the gertrud hobble the venus. If someone hobble the gertrud then the gertrud is not mute. The venus hobble the gertrud.", "logic": "\nLatch(gertrud, ursa)\nJest(gertrud, ursa)\nHobble(gertrud, venus)\nLatch(venus, gertrud)\nMute(venus)\nnot Hobble(venus, ursa)\nnot Latch(ursa, gertrud)\nIambic(ursa)\nMute(ursa)\nnot Hobble(ursa, venus)\nforall x (Jest(x, ursa) -> Jest(ursa, venus))\nJest(venus, ursa) -> Hobble(ursa, gertrud)\nforall x (Jest(x, venus) -> Hobble(venus, gertrud))\nforall x (Latch(x, gertrud) -> not Jest(x, venus))\nforall x (Latch(x, gertrud) and not Hobble(gertrud, ursa) -> Hobble(gertrud, venus))\nforall x (Hobble(x, gertrud) -> not Mute(gertrud))\n\nHobble(venus, gertrud)\n\nJest(gertrud, ursa) and forall x (Jest(x, ursa) -> Jest(ursa, venus)) -> therefore Jest(ursa, venus) Jest(ursa, venus) and forall x (Jest(x, venus) -> Hobble(venus, gertrud)) -> therefore Hobble(venus, gertrud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The aurel sinter the joachim. The aurel hoover the joachim. The aurel resuspend the lita. The lita sinter the aurel. The lita is possessive. The lita does not visit the joachim. The joachim does not chase the aurel. The joachim is placid. The joachim is possessive. The joachim does not visit the lita. If someone hoover the joachim then the joachim hoover the lita. If the lita hoover the joachim then the joachim resuspend the aurel. If someone hoover the lita then the lita resuspend the aurel. If someone sinter the aurel then they do not eat the lita. If someone sinter the aurel and the aurel does not visit the joachim then the aurel resuspend the lita. If someone resuspend the aurel then the aurel is not possessive. The lita does not visit the aurel.", "logic": "\nSinter(aurel, joachim)\nHoover(aurel, joachim)\nResuspend(aurel, lita)\nSinter(lita, aurel)\nPossessive(lita)\nnot Resuspend(lita, joachim)\nnot Sinter(joachim, aurel)\nPlacid(joachim)\nPossessive(joachim)\nnot Resuspend(joachim, lita)\nforall x (Hoover(x, joachim) -> Hoover(joachim, lita))\nHoover(lita, joachim) -> Resuspend(joachim, aurel)\nforall x (Hoover(x, lita) -> Resuspend(lita, aurel))\nforall x (Sinter(x, aurel) -> not Hoover(x, lita))\nforall x (Sinter(x, aurel) and not Resuspend(aurel, joachim) -> Resuspend(aurel, lita))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, aurel) -> not Possessive(aurel))\n\nnot Resuspend(lita, aurel)\n\nHoover(aurel, joachim) and forall x (Hoover(x, joachim) -> Hoover(joachim, lita)) -> therefore Hoover(joachim, lita) Hoover(joachim, lita) and forall x (Hoover(x, lita) -> Resuspend(lita, aurel)) -> therefore Resuspend(lita, aurel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The marco spill the sherwin. The marco premise the sherwin. The marco fantasy the talyah. The talyah spill the marco. The talyah is ctenoid. The talyah does not visit the sherwin. The sherwin does not chase the marco. The sherwin is struck. The sherwin is ctenoid. The sherwin does not visit the talyah. If someone premise the sherwin then the sherwin premise the talyah. If the talyah premise the sherwin then the sherwin fantasy the marco. If someone premise the talyah then the talyah fantasy the marco. If someone spill the marco then they do not eat the talyah. If someone spill the marco and the marco does not visit the sherwin then the marco fantasy the talyah. If someone fantasy the marco then the marco is not ctenoid. The marco is not ctenoid.", "logic": "\nSpill(marco, sherwin)\nPremise(marco, sherwin)\nFantasy(marco, talyah)\nSpill(talyah, marco)\nCtenoid(talyah)\nnot Fantasy(talyah, sherwin)\nnot Spill(sherwin, marco)\nStruck(sherwin)\nCtenoid(sherwin)\nnot Fantasy(sherwin, talyah)\nforall x (Premise(x, sherwin) -> Premise(sherwin, talyah))\nPremise(talyah, sherwin) -> Fantasy(sherwin, marco)\nforall x (Premise(x, talyah) -> Fantasy(talyah, marco))\nforall x (Spill(x, marco) -> not Premise(x, talyah))\nforall x (Spill(x, marco) and not Fantasy(marco, sherwin) -> Fantasy(marco, talyah))\nforall x (Fantasy(x, marco) -> not Ctenoid(marco))\n\nnot Ctenoid(marco)\n\nPremise(marco, sherwin) and forall x (Premise(x, sherwin) -> Premise(sherwin, talyah)) -> therefore Premise(sherwin, talyah) Premise(sherwin, talyah) and forall x (Premise(x, talyah) -> Fantasy(talyah, marco)) -> therefore Fantasy(talyah, marco) Fantasy(talyah, marco) and forall x (Fantasy(x, marco) -> not Ctenoid(marco)) -> therefore not Ctenoid(marco)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The keelia dissemble the skye. The keelia soap the skye. The keelia jerk the lefty. The lefty dissemble the keelia. The lefty is moresque. The lefty does not visit the skye. The skye does not chase the keelia. The skye is vacillant. The skye is moresque. The skye does not visit the lefty. If someone soap the skye then the skye soap the lefty. If the lefty soap the skye then the skye jerk the keelia. If someone soap the lefty then the lefty jerk the keelia. If someone dissemble the keelia then they do not eat the lefty. If someone dissemble the keelia and the keelia does not visit the skye then the keelia jerk the lefty. If someone jerk the keelia then the keelia is not moresque. The keelia is moresque.", "logic": "\nDissemble(keelia, skye)\nSoap(keelia, skye)\nJerk(keelia, lefty)\nDissemble(lefty, keelia)\nMoresque(lefty)\nnot Jerk(lefty, skye)\nnot Dissemble(skye, keelia)\nVacillant(skye)\nMoresque(skye)\nnot Jerk(skye, lefty)\nforall x (Soap(x, skye) -> Soap(skye, lefty))\nSoap(lefty, skye) -> Jerk(skye, keelia)\nforall x (Soap(x, lefty) -> Jerk(lefty, keelia))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, keelia) -> not Soap(x, lefty))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, keelia) and not Jerk(keelia, skye) -> Jerk(keelia, lefty))\nforall x (Jerk(x, keelia) -> not Moresque(keelia))\n\nMoresque(keelia)\n\nSoap(keelia, skye) and forall x (Soap(x, skye) -> Soap(skye, lefty)) -> therefore Soap(skye, lefty) Soap(skye, lefty) and forall x (Soap(x, lefty) -> Jerk(lefty, keelia)) -> therefore Jerk(lefty, keelia) Jerk(lefty, keelia) and forall x (Jerk(x, keelia) -> not Moresque(keelia)) -> therefore not Moresque(keelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The madelaine eddy the phillie. The madelaine forestall the phillie. The madelaine subvent the mandie. The mandie eddy the madelaine. The mandie is streetwise. The mandie does not visit the phillie. The phillie does not chase the madelaine. The phillie is aguish. The phillie is streetwise. The phillie does not visit the mandie. If someone forestall the phillie then the phillie forestall the mandie. If the mandie forestall the phillie then the phillie subvent the madelaine. If someone forestall the mandie then the mandie subvent the madelaine. If someone eddy the madelaine then they do not eat the mandie. If someone eddy the madelaine and the madelaine does not visit the phillie then the madelaine subvent the mandie. If someone subvent the madelaine then the madelaine is not streetwise. The phillie does not visit the madelaine.", "logic": "\nEddy(madelaine, phillie)\nForestall(madelaine, phillie)\nSubvent(madelaine, mandie)\nEddy(mandie, madelaine)\nStreetwise(mandie)\nnot Subvent(mandie, phillie)\nnot Eddy(phillie, madelaine)\nAguish(phillie)\nStreetwise(phillie)\nnot Subvent(phillie, mandie)\nforall x (Forestall(x, phillie) -> Forestall(phillie, mandie))\nForestall(mandie, phillie) -> Subvent(phillie, madelaine)\nforall x (Forestall(x, mandie) -> Subvent(mandie, madelaine))\nforall x (Eddy(x, madelaine) -> not Forestall(x, mandie))\nforall x (Eddy(x, madelaine) and not Subvent(madelaine, phillie) -> Subvent(madelaine, mandie))\nforall x (Subvent(x, madelaine) -> not Streetwise(madelaine))\n\nnot Subvent(phillie, madelaine)\n\nForestall(mandie, phillie) -> Subvent(phillie, madelaine) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The peggy undergrow the julienne. The peggy shred the julienne. The peggy crick the faina. The faina undergrow the peggy. The faina is neither. The faina does not visit the julienne. The julienne does not chase the peggy. The julienne is laid. The julienne is neither. The julienne does not visit the faina. If someone shred the julienne then the julienne shred the faina. If the faina shred the julienne then the julienne crick the peggy. If someone shred the faina then the faina crick the peggy. If someone undergrow the peggy then they do not eat the faina. If someone undergrow the peggy and the peggy does not visit the julienne then the peggy crick the faina. If someone crick the peggy then the peggy is not neither. The julienne undergrow the julienne.", "logic": "\nUndergrow(peggy, julienne)\nShred(peggy, julienne)\nCrick(peggy, faina)\nUndergrow(faina, peggy)\nNeither(faina)\nnot Crick(faina, julienne)\nnot Undergrow(julienne, peggy)\nLaid(julienne)\nNeither(julienne)\nnot Crick(julienne, faina)\nforall x (Shred(x, julienne) -> Shred(julienne, faina))\nShred(faina, julienne) -> Crick(julienne, peggy)\nforall x (Shred(x, faina) -> Crick(faina, peggy))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, peggy) -> not Shred(x, faina))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, peggy) and not Crick(peggy, julienne) -> Crick(peggy, faina))\nforall x (Crick(x, peggy) -> not Neither(peggy))\n\nUndergrow(julienne, julienne)\n\nUndergrow(julienne, julienne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The tove redo the marlon. The tove sync the marlon. The tove slabber the jasmine. The jasmine redo the tove. The jasmine is bribable. The jasmine does not visit the marlon. The marlon does not chase the tove. The marlon is satiric. The marlon is bribable. The marlon does not visit the jasmine. If someone sync the marlon then the marlon sync the jasmine. If the jasmine sync the marlon then the marlon slabber the tove. If someone sync the jasmine then the jasmine slabber the tove. If someone redo the tove then they do not eat the jasmine. If someone redo the tove and the tove does not visit the marlon then the tove slabber the jasmine. If someone slabber the tove then the tove is not bribable. The tove does not chase the jasmine.", "logic": "\nRedo(tove, marlon)\nSync(tove, marlon)\nSlabber(tove, jasmine)\nRedo(jasmine, tove)\nBribable(jasmine)\nnot Slabber(jasmine, marlon)\nnot Redo(marlon, tove)\nSatiric(marlon)\nBribable(marlon)\nnot Slabber(marlon, jasmine)\nforall x (Sync(x, marlon) -> Sync(marlon, jasmine))\nSync(jasmine, marlon) -> Slabber(marlon, tove)\nforall x (Sync(x, jasmine) -> Slabber(jasmine, tove))\nforall x (Redo(x, tove) -> not Sync(x, jasmine))\nforall x (Redo(x, tove) and not Slabber(tove, marlon) -> Slabber(tove, jasmine))\nforall x (Slabber(x, tove) -> not Bribable(tove))\n\nnot Redo(tove, jasmine)\n\nnot Redo(tove, jasmine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The allyce ebonise the amandi. The allyce succor the amandi. The allyce summarise the derick. The derick ebonise the allyce. The derick is stiff. The derick does not visit the amandi. The amandi does not chase the allyce. The amandi is snug. The amandi is stiff. The amandi does not visit the derick. If someone succor the amandi then the amandi succor the derick. If the derick succor the amandi then the amandi summarise the allyce. If someone succor the derick then the derick summarise the allyce. If someone ebonise the allyce then they do not eat the derick. If someone ebonise the allyce and the allyce does not visit the amandi then the allyce summarise the derick. If someone summarise the allyce then the allyce is not stiff. The allyce summarise the amandi.", "logic": "\nEbonise(allyce, amandi)\nSuccor(allyce, amandi)\nSummarise(allyce, derick)\nEbonise(derick, allyce)\nStiff(derick)\nnot Summarise(derick, amandi)\nnot Ebonise(amandi, allyce)\nSnug(amandi)\nStiff(amandi)\nnot Summarise(amandi, derick)\nforall x (Succor(x, amandi) -> Succor(amandi, derick))\nSuccor(derick, amandi) -> Summarise(amandi, allyce)\nforall x (Succor(x, derick) -> Summarise(derick, allyce))\nforall x (Ebonise(x, allyce) -> not Succor(x, derick))\nforall x (Ebonise(x, allyce) and not Summarise(allyce, amandi) -> Summarise(allyce, derick))\nforall x (Summarise(x, allyce) -> not Stiff(allyce))\n\nSummarise(allyce, amandi)\n\nSummarise(allyce, amandi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The aprilette repeal the charmian. The aprilette arborize the charmian. The aprilette host the augie. The augie repeal the aprilette. The augie is enraged. The augie does not visit the charmian. The charmian does not chase the aprilette. The charmian is prototypal. The charmian is enraged. The charmian does not visit the augie. If someone arborize the charmian then the charmian arborize the augie. If the augie arborize the charmian then the charmian host the aprilette. If someone arborize the augie then the augie host the aprilette. If someone repeal the aprilette then they do not eat the augie. If someone repeal the aprilette and the aprilette does not visit the charmian then the aprilette host the augie. If someone host the aprilette then the aprilette is not enraged. The augie is not round.", "logic": "\nRepeal(aprilette, charmian)\nArborize(aprilette, charmian)\nHost(aprilette, augie)\nRepeal(augie, aprilette)\nEnraged(augie)\nnot Host(augie, charmian)\nnot Repeal(charmian, aprilette)\nPrototypal(charmian)\nEnraged(charmian)\nnot Host(charmian, augie)\nforall x (Arborize(x, charmian) -> Arborize(charmian, augie))\nArborize(augie, charmian) -> Host(charmian, aprilette)\nforall x (Arborize(x, augie) -> Host(augie, aprilette))\nforall x (Repeal(x, aprilette) -> not Arborize(x, augie))\nforall x (Repeal(x, aprilette) and not Host(aprilette, charmian) -> Host(aprilette, augie))\nforall x (Host(x, aprilette) -> not Enraged(aprilette))\n\nnot Round(augie)\n\nnot Round(augie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The fanchette mentor the chloris. The fanchette subjugate the chloris. The fanchette bombilate the olympie. The olympie mentor the fanchette. The olympie is ringlike. The olympie does not visit the chloris. The chloris does not chase the fanchette. The chloris is wonted. The chloris is ringlike. The chloris does not visit the olympie. If someone subjugate the chloris then the chloris subjugate the olympie. If the olympie subjugate the chloris then the chloris bombilate the fanchette. If someone subjugate the olympie then the olympie bombilate the fanchette. If someone mentor the fanchette then they do not eat the olympie. If someone mentor the fanchette and the fanchette does not visit the chloris then the fanchette bombilate the olympie. If someone bombilate the fanchette then the fanchette is not ringlike. The fanchette is wonted.", "logic": "\nMentor(fanchette, chloris)\nSubjugate(fanchette, chloris)\nBombilate(fanchette, olympie)\nMentor(olympie, fanchette)\nRinglike(olympie)\nnot Bombilate(olympie, chloris)\nnot Mentor(chloris, fanchette)\nWonted(chloris)\nRinglike(chloris)\nnot Bombilate(chloris, olympie)\nforall x (Subjugate(x, chloris) -> Subjugate(chloris, olympie))\nSubjugate(olympie, chloris) -> Bombilate(chloris, fanchette)\nforall x (Subjugate(x, olympie) -> Bombilate(olympie, fanchette))\nforall x (Mentor(x, fanchette) -> not Subjugate(x, olympie))\nforall x (Mentor(x, fanchette) and not Bombilate(fanchette, chloris) -> Bombilate(fanchette, olympie))\nforall x (Bombilate(x, fanchette) -> not Ringlike(fanchette))\n\nWonted(fanchette)\n\nWonted(fanchette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The marybeth drain the aimee. The marybeth vaccinate the aimee. The marybeth enrobe the terrance. The terrance drain the marybeth. The terrance is mesmeric. The terrance does not visit the aimee. The aimee does not chase the marybeth. The aimee is heathen. The aimee is mesmeric. The aimee does not visit the terrance. If someone vaccinate the aimee then the aimee vaccinate the terrance. If the terrance vaccinate the aimee then the aimee enrobe the marybeth. If someone vaccinate the terrance then the terrance enrobe the marybeth. If someone drain the marybeth then they do not eat the terrance. If someone drain the marybeth and the marybeth does not visit the aimee then the marybeth enrobe the terrance. If someone enrobe the marybeth then the marybeth is not mesmeric. The marybeth does not eat the terrance.", "logic": "\nDrain(marybeth, aimee)\nVaccinate(marybeth, aimee)\nEnrobe(marybeth, terrance)\nDrain(terrance, marybeth)\nMesmeric(terrance)\nnot Enrobe(terrance, aimee)\nnot Drain(aimee, marybeth)\nHeathen(aimee)\nMesmeric(aimee)\nnot Enrobe(aimee, terrance)\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, aimee) -> Vaccinate(aimee, terrance))\nVaccinate(terrance, aimee) -> Enrobe(aimee, marybeth)\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, terrance) -> Enrobe(terrance, marybeth))\nforall x (Drain(x, marybeth) -> not Vaccinate(x, terrance))\nforall x (Drain(x, marybeth) and not Enrobe(marybeth, aimee) -> Enrobe(marybeth, terrance))\nforall x (Enrobe(x, marybeth) -> not Mesmeric(marybeth))\n\nnot Vaccinate(marybeth, terrance)\n\nnot Vaccinate(marybeth, terrance) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "The aram disabuse the lona. The aram optimise the lona. The aram stride the geri. The geri disabuse the aram. The geri is oleaginous. The geri does not visit the lona. The lona does not chase the aram. The lona is decisive. The lona is oleaginous. The lona does not visit the geri. If someone optimise the lona then the lona optimise the geri. If the geri optimise the lona then the lona stride the aram. If someone optimise the geri then the geri stride the aram. If someone disabuse the aram then they do not eat the geri. If someone disabuse the aram and the aram does not visit the lona then the aram stride the geri. If someone stride the aram then the aram is not oleaginous. The geri optimise the aram.", "logic": "\nDisabuse(aram, lona)\nOptimise(aram, lona)\nStride(aram, geri)\nDisabuse(geri, aram)\nOleaginous(geri)\nnot Stride(geri, lona)\nnot Disabuse(lona, aram)\nDecisive(lona)\nOleaginous(lona)\nnot Stride(lona, geri)\nforall x (Optimise(x, lona) -> Optimise(lona, geri))\nOptimise(geri, lona) -> Stride(lona, aram)\nforall x (Optimise(x, geri) -> Stride(geri, aram))\nforall x (Disabuse(x, aram) -> not Optimise(x, geri))\nforall x (Disabuse(x, aram) and not Stride(aram, lona) -> Stride(aram, geri))\nforall x (Stride(x, aram) -> not Oleaginous(aram))\n\nOptimise(geri, aram)\n\nOptimise(geri, aram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1084"} {"premises": "Marys is restricted. Milicent is melancholy. Brittan is nervous. Ginnifer is restricted. Big things are melancholy. All restricted, chartered things are unimagined. All chartered things are restricted. If something is restricted then it is drugless. All melancholy things are assuring. All drugless, restricted things are unimagined. Milicent is melancholy.", "logic": "\nRestricted(marys)\nMelancholy(milicent)\nNervous(brittan)\nRestricted(ginnifer)\nforall x (Unimagined(x) -> Melancholy(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) and Chartered(x) -> Unimagined(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Restricted(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Drugless(x))\nforall x (Melancholy(x) -> Assuring(x))\nforall x (Drugless(x) and Restricted(x) -> Unimagined(x))\n\nMelancholy(milicent)\n\ntherefore Melancholy(milicent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Darleen is subsurface. Mada is choosey. Harv is tartarean. Darcey is subsurface. Big things are choosey. All subsurface, unworthy things are webby. All unworthy things are subsurface. If something is subsurface then it is scrimy. All choosey things are unicuspid. All scrimy, subsurface things are webby. Darleen is not subsurface.", "logic": "\nSubsurface(darleen)\nChoosey(mada)\nTartarean(harv)\nSubsurface(darcey)\nforall x (Webby(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Subsurface(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Webby(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Subsurface(x))\nforall x (Subsurface(x) -> Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Scrimy(x) and Subsurface(x) -> Webby(x))\n\nnot Subsurface(darleen)\n\ntherefore Subsurface(darleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Austine is hourly. Keene is abstract. Zared is systemic. Jeanelle is hourly. Big things are abstract. All hourly, lenten things are extensive. All lenten things are hourly. If something is hourly then it is impeccable. All abstract things are dramatic. All impeccable, hourly things are extensive. Austine is impeccable.", "logic": "\nHourly(austine)\nAbstract(keene)\nSystemic(zared)\nHourly(jeanelle)\nforall x (Extensive(x) -> Abstract(x))\nforall x (Hourly(x) and Lenten(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) -> Hourly(x))\nforall x (Hourly(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Abstract(x) -> Dramatic(x))\nforall x (Impeccable(x) and Hourly(x) -> Extensive(x))\n\nImpeccable(austine)\n\nHourly(austine) and forall x (Hourly(x) -> Impeccable(x)) -> therefore Impeccable(austine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Bret is aglitter. Vernor is madagascan. Nevins is walloping. Marti is aglitter. Big things are madagascan. All aglitter, edacious things are witching. All edacious things are aglitter. If something is aglitter then it is unwed. All madagascan things are pineal. All unwed, aglitter things are witching. Bret is not unwed.", "logic": "\nAglitter(bret)\nMadagascan(vernor)\nWalloping(nevins)\nAglitter(marti)\nforall x (Witching(x) -> Madagascan(x))\nforall x (Aglitter(x) and Edacious(x) -> Witching(x))\nforall x (Edacious(x) -> Aglitter(x))\nforall x (Aglitter(x) -> Unwed(x))\nforall x (Madagascan(x) -> Pineal(x))\nforall x (Unwed(x) and Aglitter(x) -> Witching(x))\n\nnot Unwed(bret)\n\nAglitter(bret) and forall x (Aglitter(x) -> Unwed(x)) -> therefore Unwed(bret)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Bubba is unmixable. Lucretia is handled. Jenny is unflagging. Rowe is unmixable. Big things are handled. All unmixable, emended things are ferrous. All emended things are unmixable. If something is unmixable then it is under. All handled things are secretory. All under, unmixable things are ferrous. Bubba is ferrous.", "logic": "\nUnmixable(bubba)\nHandled(lucretia)\nUnflagging(jenny)\nUnmixable(rowe)\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Handled(x))\nforall x (Unmixable(x) and Emended(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Emended(x) -> Unmixable(x))\nforall x (Unmixable(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Handled(x) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Under(x) and Unmixable(x) -> Ferrous(x))\n\nFerrous(bubba)\n\nUnmixable(bubba) and forall x (Unmixable(x) -> Under(x)) -> therefore Under(bubba) Under(bubba) and Unmixable(bubba) and forall x (Under(x) and Unmixable(x) -> Ferrous(x)) -> therefore Ferrous(bubba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Lilah is connective. Demetria is tutelary. Isidore is popish. Ivett is connective. Big things are tutelary. All connective, indie things are pervious. All indie things are connective. If something is connective then it is unmilitary. All tutelary things are awninged. All unmilitary, connective things are pervious. Lilah is not pervious.", "logic": "\nConnective(lilah)\nTutelary(demetria)\nPopish(isidore)\nConnective(ivett)\nforall x (Pervious(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Connective(x) and Indie(x) -> Pervious(x))\nforall x (Indie(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Connective(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\nforall x (Tutelary(x) -> Awninged(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Connective(x) -> Pervious(x))\n\nnot Pervious(lilah)\n\nConnective(lilah) and forall x (Connective(x) -> Unmilitary(x)) -> therefore Unmilitary(lilah) Unmilitary(lilah) and Connective(lilah) and forall x (Unmilitary(x) and Connective(x) -> Pervious(x)) -> therefore Pervious(lilah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Wren is tearaway. Merrily is copious. Krystyna is restrained. Layney is tearaway. Big things are copious. All tearaway, unionised things are sewed. All unionised things are tearaway. If something is tearaway then it is cantering. All copious things are unopposed. All cantering, tearaway things are sewed. Layney is copious.", "logic": "\nTearaway(wren)\nCopious(merrily)\nRestrained(krystyna)\nTearaway(layney)\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Copious(x))\nforall x (Tearaway(x) and Unionised(x) -> Sewed(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) -> Tearaway(x))\nforall x (Tearaway(x) -> Cantering(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Unopposed(x))\nforall x (Cantering(x) and Tearaway(x) -> Sewed(x))\n\nCopious(layney)\n\nTearaway(layney) and forall x (Tearaway(x) -> Cantering(x)) -> therefore Cantering(layney) Cantering(layney) and Tearaway(layney) and forall x (Cantering(x) and Tearaway(x) -> Sewed(x)) -> therefore Sewed(layney) Sewed(layney) and forall x (Sewed(x) -> Copious(x)) -> therefore Copious(layney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Hanford is monumental. Tina is stabbing. Pace is haemal. Sibley is monumental. Big things are stabbing. All monumental, splay things are pakistani. All splay things are monumental. If something is monumental then it is tactful. All stabbing things are sarcosomal. All tactful, monumental things are pakistani. Hanford is not stabbing.", "logic": "\nMonumental(hanford)\nStabbing(tina)\nHaemal(pace)\nMonumental(sibley)\nforall x (Pakistani(x) -> Stabbing(x))\nforall x (Monumental(x) and Splay(x) -> Pakistani(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) -> Monumental(x))\nforall x (Monumental(x) -> Tactful(x))\nforall x (Stabbing(x) -> Sarcosomal(x))\nforall x (Tactful(x) and Monumental(x) -> Pakistani(x))\n\nnot Stabbing(hanford)\n\nMonumental(hanford) and forall x (Monumental(x) -> Tactful(x)) -> therefore Tactful(hanford) Tactful(hanford) and Monumental(hanford) and forall x (Tactful(x) and Monumental(x) -> Pakistani(x)) -> therefore Pakistani(hanford) Pakistani(hanford) and forall x (Pakistani(x) -> Stabbing(x)) -> therefore Stabbing(hanford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Mabelle is stray. Lizzy is atypical. Marrissa is lobular. Toma is stray. Big things are atypical. All stray, unfurrowed things are pleonastic. All unfurrowed things are stray. If something is stray then it is tearless. All atypical things are decadent. All tearless, stray things are pleonastic. Lizzy is not stray.", "logic": "\nStray(mabelle)\nAtypical(lizzy)\nLobular(marrissa)\nStray(toma)\nforall x (Pleonastic(x) -> Atypical(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) and Unfurrowed(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) -> Tearless(x))\nforall x (Atypical(x) -> Decadent(x))\nforall x (Tearless(x) and Stray(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\n\nnot Stray(lizzy)\n\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Stray(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Frayda is arabian. Juliane is hadean. Corny is seagirt. Holly is arabian. Big things are hadean. All arabian, unlovable things are twinkly. All unlovable things are arabian. If something is arabian then it is cuddly. All hadean things are arthritic. All cuddly, arabian things are twinkly. Corny is cuddly.", "logic": "\nArabian(frayda)\nHadean(juliane)\nSeagirt(corny)\nArabian(holly)\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Hadean(x))\nforall x (Arabian(x) and Unlovable(x) -> Twinkly(x))\nforall x (Unlovable(x) -> Arabian(x))\nforall x (Arabian(x) -> Cuddly(x))\nforall x (Hadean(x) -> Arthritic(x))\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and Arabian(x) -> Twinkly(x))\n\nCuddly(corny)\n\nforall x (Arabian(x) -> Cuddly(x)) <- forall x (Unlovable(x) -> Arabian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Hendrika is rumanian. Bonnee is vertical. Mateo is maidenlike. Josi is rumanian. Big things are vertical. All rumanian, birch things are patellar. All birch things are rumanian. If something is rumanian then it is squalid. All vertical things are unworthy. All squalid, rumanian things are patellar. Mateo is not vertical.", "logic": "\nRumanian(hendrika)\nVertical(bonnee)\nMaidenlike(mateo)\nRumanian(josi)\nforall x (Patellar(x) -> Vertical(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) and Birch(x) -> Patellar(x))\nforall x (Birch(x) -> Rumanian(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) -> Squalid(x))\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nforall x (Squalid(x) and Rumanian(x) -> Patellar(x))\n\nnot Vertical(mateo)\n\nforall x (Patellar(x) -> Vertical(x)) <- forall x (Squalid(x) and Rumanian(x) -> Patellar(x)) <- forall x (Birch(x) -> Rumanian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Joya is unifilar. Gaynor is lyrate. Pollyanna is quasi. Toni is unifilar. Big things are lyrate. All unifilar, uncaused things are pitted. All uncaused things are unifilar. If something is unifilar then it is formic. All lyrate things are thirdhand. All formic, unifilar things are pitted. Pollyanna is pitted.", "logic": "\nUnifilar(joya)\nLyrate(gaynor)\nQuasi(pollyanna)\nUnifilar(toni)\nforall x (Pitted(x) -> Lyrate(x))\nforall x (Unifilar(x) and Uncaused(x) -> Pitted(x))\nforall x (Uncaused(x) -> Unifilar(x))\nforall x (Unifilar(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Lyrate(x) -> Thirdhand(x))\nforall x (Formic(x) and Unifilar(x) -> Pitted(x))\n\nPitted(pollyanna)\n\nforall x (Formic(x) and Unifilar(x) -> Pitted(x)) <- forall x (Uncaused(x) -> Unifilar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Iris is nuts. Adrienne is exquisite. Rex is restless. Elene is nuts. Big things are exquisite. All nuts, harrowing things are elvish. All harrowing things are nuts. If something is nuts then it is enough. All exquisite things are ugly. All enough, nuts things are elvish. Elene is not restless.", "logic": "\nNuts(iris)\nExquisite(adrienne)\nRestless(rex)\nNuts(elene)\nforall x (Elvish(x) -> Exquisite(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) and Harrowing(x) -> Elvish(x))\nforall x (Harrowing(x) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Nuts(x) -> Enough(x))\nforall x (Exquisite(x) -> Ugly(x))\nforall x (Enough(x) and Nuts(x) -> Elvish(x))\n\nnot Restless(elene)\n\nnot Restless(elene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Willey is morganatic. Nikki is precise. Eveleen is mechanized. Saunders is morganatic. Big things are precise. All morganatic, nagging things are loving. All nagging things are morganatic. If something is morganatic then it is knotted. All precise things are painterly. All knotted, morganatic things are loving. Nikki is nagging.", "logic": "\nMorganatic(willey)\nPrecise(nikki)\nMechanized(eveleen)\nMorganatic(saunders)\nforall x (Loving(x) -> Precise(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) and Nagging(x) -> Loving(x))\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Morganatic(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Precise(x) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Knotted(x) and Morganatic(x) -> Loving(x))\n\nNagging(nikki)\n\nNagging(nikki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Hannah is ambitious. Sascha is crustal. Maegan is underfed. Ronnie is ambitious. Big things are crustal. All ambitious, squeaky things are humble. All squeaky things are ambitious. If something is ambitious then it is terminal. All crustal things are grecian. All terminal, ambitious things are humble. Hannah is not squeaky.", "logic": "\nAmbitious(hannah)\nCrustal(sascha)\nUnderfed(maegan)\nAmbitious(ronnie)\nforall x (Humble(x) -> Crustal(x))\nforall x (Ambitious(x) and Squeaky(x) -> Humble(x))\nforall x (Squeaky(x) -> Ambitious(x))\nforall x (Ambitious(x) -> Terminal(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) -> Grecian(x))\nforall x (Terminal(x) and Ambitious(x) -> Humble(x))\n\nnot Squeaky(hannah)\n\nnot Squeaky(hannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Maurice is preserved. Milissent is unfocused. Horatius is forfeited. Luise is preserved. Big things are unfocused. All preserved, exportable things are cytotoxic. All exportable things are preserved. If something is preserved then it is immotile. All unfocused things are overstated. All immotile, preserved things are cytotoxic. Luise is exportable.", "logic": "\nPreserved(maurice)\nUnfocused(milissent)\nForfeited(horatius)\nPreserved(luise)\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Unfocused(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and Exportable(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nforall x (Exportable(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Immotile(x))\nforall x (Unfocused(x) -> Overstated(x))\nforall x (Immotile(x) and Preserved(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\n\nExportable(luise)\n\nExportable(luise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1204"} {"premises": "Monica is pleochroic. Monica is seeping. Monica is operable. Monica is bipolar. Monica is apart. Monica is nonfissile. Monica is not operating. Young people are not nonfissile. Monica is not operating.", "logic": "\nPleochroic(monica)\nSeeping(monica)\nOperable(monica)\nBipolar(monica)\nApart(monica)\nNonfissile(monica)\nnot Operating(monica)\nforall x (Operating(x) -> not Nonfissile(x))\n\nnot Operating(monica)\n\ntherefore not Operating(monica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-205"} {"premises": "Diannne is mannish. Diannne is bawdy. Diannne is procurable. Diannne is sculptured. Diannne is icelandic. Diannne is fingerless. Diannne is not royal. Young people are not fingerless. Diannne is royal.", "logic": "\nMannish(diannne)\nBawdy(diannne)\nProcurable(diannne)\nSculptured(diannne)\nIcelandic(diannne)\nFingerless(diannne)\nnot Royal(diannne)\nforall x (Royal(x) -> not Fingerless(x))\n\nRoyal(diannne)\n\ntherefore not Royal(diannne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-205"} {"premises": "Noreen is trying. Noreen is dowerless. Celie is monestrous. Cold, lxxiv things are impossible. Rough things are sopranino. If Noreen is impossible and Noreen is monestrous then Noreen is trying. Furry, monestrous things are trying. Blue things are monestrous. All sopranino things are impossible. Noreen is trying.", "logic": "\nTrying(noreen)\nDowerless(noreen)\nMonestrous(celie)\nforall x (Sopranino(x) and Lxxiv(x) -> Impossible(x))\nforall x (Dowerless(x) -> Sopranino(x))\nImpossible(noreen) and Monestrous(noreen) -> Trying(noreen)\nforall x (Foliaged(x) and Monestrous(x) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Impossible(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Impossible(x))\n\nTrying(noreen)\n\ntherefore Trying(noreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Robinetta is opposable. Robinetta is soulful. Leah is nomadic. Cold, enigmatic things are mutable. Rough things are cloggy. If Robinetta is mutable and Robinetta is nomadic then Robinetta is opposable. Furry, nomadic things are opposable. Blue things are nomadic. All cloggy things are mutable. Robinetta is not soulful.", "logic": "\nOpposable(robinetta)\nSoulful(robinetta)\nNomadic(leah)\nforall x (Cloggy(x) and Enigmatic(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Soulful(x) -> Cloggy(x))\nMutable(robinetta) and Nomadic(robinetta) -> Opposable(robinetta)\nforall x (Uncaring(x) and Nomadic(x) -> Opposable(x))\nforall x (Mutable(x) -> Nomadic(x))\nforall x (Cloggy(x) -> Mutable(x))\n\nnot Soulful(robinetta)\n\ntherefore Soulful(robinetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Ave is bizonal. Ave is pursuing. Kaitlynn is swept. Cold, tomentose things are cliched. Rough things are pulmonary. If Ave is cliched and Ave is swept then Ave is bizonal. Furry, swept things are bizonal. Blue things are swept. All pulmonary things are cliched. Ave is pulmonary.", "logic": "\nBizonal(ave)\nPursuing(ave)\nSwept(kaitlynn)\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) and Tomentose(x) -> Cliched(x))\nforall x (Pursuing(x) -> Pulmonary(x))\nCliched(ave) and Swept(ave) -> Bizonal(ave)\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Swept(x) -> Bizonal(x))\nforall x (Cliched(x) -> Swept(x))\nforall x (Pulmonary(x) -> Cliched(x))\n\nPulmonary(ave)\n\nPursuing(ave) and forall x (Pursuing(x) -> Pulmonary(x)) -> therefore Pulmonary(ave)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Simon is vestmented. Simon is shintoist. Skyler is affable. Cold, stemmed things are receptive. Rough things are tref. If Simon is receptive and Simon is affable then Simon is vestmented. Furry, affable things are vestmented. Blue things are affable. All tref things are receptive. Simon is not tref.", "logic": "\nVestmented(simon)\nShintoist(simon)\nAffable(skyler)\nforall x (Tref(x) and Stemmed(x) -> Receptive(x))\nforall x (Shintoist(x) -> Tref(x))\nReceptive(simon) and Affable(simon) -> Vestmented(simon)\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) and Affable(x) -> Vestmented(x))\nforall x (Receptive(x) -> Affable(x))\nforall x (Tref(x) -> Receptive(x))\n\nnot Tref(simon)\n\nShintoist(simon) and forall x (Shintoist(x) -> Tref(x)) -> therefore Tref(simon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Karalee is unplumbed. Karalee is forceful. Lyle is okay. Cold, disabused things are unactable. Rough things are allergenic. If Karalee is unactable and Karalee is okay then Karalee is unplumbed. Furry, okay things are unplumbed. Blue things are okay. All allergenic things are unactable. Karalee is unactable.", "logic": "\nUnplumbed(karalee)\nForceful(karalee)\nOkay(lyle)\nforall x (Allergenic(x) and Disabused(x) -> Unactable(x))\nforall x (Forceful(x) -> Allergenic(x))\nUnactable(karalee) and Okay(karalee) -> Unplumbed(karalee)\nforall x (Expiable(x) and Okay(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Unactable(x) -> Okay(x))\nforall x (Allergenic(x) -> Unactable(x))\n\nUnactable(karalee)\n\nForceful(karalee) and forall x (Forceful(x) -> Allergenic(x)) -> therefore Allergenic(karalee) Allergenic(karalee) and forall x (Allergenic(x) -> Unactable(x)) -> therefore Unactable(karalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Iseabal is pemphigous. Iseabal is circadian. Brigit is hourlong. Cold, sulphurous things are inflatable. Rough things are unavailing. If Iseabal is inflatable and Iseabal is hourlong then Iseabal is pemphigous. Furry, hourlong things are pemphigous. Blue things are hourlong. All unavailing things are inflatable. Iseabal is not inflatable.", "logic": "\nPemphigous(iseabal)\nCircadian(iseabal)\nHourlong(brigit)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) and Sulphurous(x) -> Inflatable(x))\nforall x (Circadian(x) -> Unavailing(x))\nInflatable(iseabal) and Hourlong(iseabal) -> Pemphigous(iseabal)\nforall x (Roast(x) and Hourlong(x) -> Pemphigous(x))\nforall x (Inflatable(x) -> Hourlong(x))\nforall x (Unavailing(x) -> Inflatable(x))\n\nnot Inflatable(iseabal)\n\nCircadian(iseabal) and forall x (Circadian(x) -> Unavailing(x)) -> therefore Unavailing(iseabal) Unavailing(iseabal) and forall x (Unavailing(x) -> Inflatable(x)) -> therefore Inflatable(iseabal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Xenos is synchronic. Xenos is agrypnotic. Laila is intense. Cold, bacillary things are paroicous. Rough things are under. If Xenos is paroicous and Xenos is intense then Xenos is synchronic. Furry, intense things are synchronic. Blue things are intense. All under things are paroicous. Xenos is intense.", "logic": "\nSynchronic(xenos)\nAgrypnotic(xenos)\nIntense(laila)\nforall x (Under(x) and Bacillary(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Agrypnotic(x) -> Under(x))\nParoicous(xenos) and Intense(xenos) -> Synchronic(xenos)\nforall x (Crispy(x) and Intense(x) -> Synchronic(x))\nforall x (Paroicous(x) -> Intense(x))\nforall x (Under(x) -> Paroicous(x))\n\nIntense(xenos)\n\nAgrypnotic(xenos) and forall x (Agrypnotic(x) -> Under(x)) -> therefore Under(xenos) Under(xenos) and forall x (Under(x) -> Paroicous(x)) -> therefore Paroicous(xenos) Paroicous(xenos) and forall x (Paroicous(x) -> Intense(x)) -> therefore Intense(xenos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Karim is dressed. Karim is mussy. Gweneth is arced. Cold, proximo things are sedative. Rough things are copious. If Karim is sedative and Karim is arced then Karim is dressed. Furry, arced things are dressed. Blue things are arced. All copious things are sedative. Karim is not arced.", "logic": "\nDressed(karim)\nMussy(karim)\nArced(gweneth)\nforall x (Copious(x) and Proximo(x) -> Sedative(x))\nforall x (Mussy(x) -> Copious(x))\nSedative(karim) and Arced(karim) -> Dressed(karim)\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Arced(x) -> Dressed(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Arced(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Sedative(x))\n\nnot Arced(karim)\n\nMussy(karim) and forall x (Mussy(x) -> Copious(x)) -> therefore Copious(karim) Copious(karim) and forall x (Copious(x) -> Sedative(x)) -> therefore Sedative(karim) Sedative(karim) and forall x (Sedative(x) -> Arced(x)) -> therefore Arced(karim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Rahel is treeless. Rahel is everyday. Raye is appeasable. Cold, languorous things are bilateral. Rough things are permissive. If Rahel is bilateral and Rahel is appeasable then Rahel is treeless. Furry, appeasable things are treeless. Blue things are appeasable. All permissive things are bilateral. Raye is not permissive.", "logic": "\nTreeless(rahel)\nEveryday(rahel)\nAppeasable(raye)\nforall x (Permissive(x) and Languorous(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) -> Permissive(x))\nBilateral(rahel) and Appeasable(rahel) -> Treeless(rahel)\nforall x (Unlisted(x) and Appeasable(x) -> Treeless(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Appeasable(x))\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Bilateral(x))\n\nnot Permissive(raye)\n\nforall x (Everyday(x) -> Permissive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Delila is bisulcate. Delila is darkened. Filia is bridgeable. Cold, overdue things are terrified. Rough things are mint. If Delila is terrified and Delila is bridgeable then Delila is bisulcate. Furry, bridgeable things are bisulcate. Blue things are bridgeable. All mint things are terrified. Filia is terrified.", "logic": "\nBisulcate(delila)\nDarkened(delila)\nBridgeable(filia)\nforall x (Mint(x) and Overdue(x) -> Terrified(x))\nforall x (Darkened(x) -> Mint(x))\nTerrified(delila) and Bridgeable(delila) -> Bisulcate(delila)\nforall x (Impenitent(x) and Bridgeable(x) -> Bisulcate(x))\nforall x (Terrified(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Mint(x) -> Terrified(x))\n\nTerrified(filia)\n\nforall x (Mint(x) -> Terrified(x)) <- forall x (Darkened(x) -> Mint(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Misha is fickle. Misha is barmy. Teodor is swiss. Cold, special things are azido. Rough things are fractional. If Misha is azido and Misha is swiss then Misha is fickle. Furry, swiss things are fickle. Blue things are swiss. All fractional things are azido. Teodor is not fickle.", "logic": "\nFickle(misha)\nBarmy(misha)\nSwiss(teodor)\nforall x (Fractional(x) and Special(x) -> Azido(x))\nforall x (Barmy(x) -> Fractional(x))\nAzido(misha) and Swiss(misha) -> Fickle(misha)\nforall x (Canonist(x) and Swiss(x) -> Fickle(x))\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Swiss(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) -> Azido(x))\n\nnot Fickle(teodor)\n\nforall x (Canonist(x) and Swiss(x) -> Fickle(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "August is rueful. August is double. Carmen is unplumbed. Cold, merry things are middlemost. Rough things are inexplicit. If August is middlemost and August is unplumbed then August is rueful. Furry, unplumbed things are rueful. Blue things are unplumbed. All inexplicit things are middlemost. Carmen is colorful.", "logic": "\nRueful(august)\nDouble(august)\nUnplumbed(carmen)\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) and Merry(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nforall x (Double(x) -> Inexplicit(x))\nMiddlemost(august) and Unplumbed(august) -> Rueful(august)\nforall x (Colorful(x) and Unplumbed(x) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) -> Middlemost(x))\n\nColorful(carmen)\n\nColorful(carmen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Rubia is vicinal. Rubia is anguine. Marge is repressed. Cold, duckbill things are bitterish. Rough things are feudal. If Rubia is bitterish and Rubia is repressed then Rubia is vicinal. Furry, repressed things are vicinal. Blue things are repressed. All feudal things are bitterish. Marge is not duckbill.", "logic": "\nVicinal(rubia)\nAnguine(rubia)\nRepressed(marge)\nforall x (Feudal(x) and Duckbill(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Anguine(x) -> Feudal(x))\nBitterish(rubia) and Repressed(rubia) -> Vicinal(rubia)\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Repressed(x) -> Vicinal(x))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) -> Repressed(x))\nforall x (Feudal(x) -> Bitterish(x))\n\nnot Duckbill(marge)\n\nnot Duckbill(marge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Estel is granitic. Estel is mutagenic. Carolina is disquieted. Cold, disturbed things are arteriolar. Rough things are indistinct. If Estel is arteriolar and Estel is disquieted then Estel is granitic. Furry, disquieted things are granitic. Blue things are disquieted. All indistinct things are arteriolar. Estel is disturbed.", "logic": "\nGranitic(estel)\nMutagenic(estel)\nDisquieted(carolina)\nforall x (Indistinct(x) and Disturbed(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Indistinct(x))\nArteriolar(estel) and Disquieted(estel) -> Granitic(estel)\nforall x (Subtropic(x) and Disquieted(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Arteriolar(x) -> Disquieted(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\n\nDisturbed(estel)\n\nDisturbed(estel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Wynn is sprigged. Wynn is documental. Atalanta is infinite. Cold, cadaveric things are snappish. Rough things are crenate. If Wynn is snappish and Wynn is infinite then Wynn is sprigged. Furry, infinite things are sprigged. Blue things are infinite. All crenate things are snappish. Wynn is not insincere.", "logic": "\nSprigged(wynn)\nDocumental(wynn)\nInfinite(atalanta)\nforall x (Crenate(x) and Cadaveric(x) -> Snappish(x))\nforall x (Documental(x) -> Crenate(x))\nSnappish(wynn) and Infinite(wynn) -> Sprigged(wynn)\nforall x (Insincere(x) and Infinite(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Infinite(x))\nforall x (Crenate(x) -> Snappish(x))\n\nnot Insincere(wynn)\n\nnot Insincere(wynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Clemmie is impolite. Clemmie is pyrogenous. Bonny is soulful. Cold, enabling things are monoatomic. Rough things are untrusting. If Clemmie is monoatomic and Clemmie is soulful then Clemmie is impolite. Furry, soulful things are impolite. Blue things are soulful. All untrusting things are monoatomic. Bonny is pyrogenous.", "logic": "\nImpolite(clemmie)\nPyrogenous(clemmie)\nSoulful(bonny)\nforall x (Untrusting(x) and Enabling(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenous(x) -> Untrusting(x))\nMonoatomic(clemmie) and Soulful(clemmie) -> Impolite(clemmie)\nforall x (Delusional(x) and Soulful(x) -> Impolite(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Soulful(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\n\nPyrogenous(bonny)\n\nPyrogenous(bonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1259"} {"premises": "Francesco is formulary. Francesco is fingered. Francesco is unvaried. Francesco is rowdy. Francesco is basal. Renaud is formulary. Renaud is phobic. Renaud is fingered. Renaud is unvaried. Rasla is formulary. Rasla is phobic. Rasla is limbed. Rasla is fingered. Rasla is unvaried. Rasla is rowdy. Rasla is basal. Smart, formulary people are basal. Nice, unvaried people are rowdy. All formulary people are limbed. Rasla is unvaried.", "logic": "\nFormulary(francesco)\nFingered(francesco)\nUnvaried(francesco)\nRowdy(francesco)\nBasal(francesco)\nFormulary(renaud)\nPhobic(renaud)\nFingered(renaud)\nUnvaried(renaud)\nFormulary(rasla)\nPhobic(rasla)\nLimbed(rasla)\nFingered(rasla)\nUnvaried(rasla)\nRowdy(rasla)\nBasal(rasla)\nforall x (Rowdy(x) and Formulary(x) -> Basal(x))\nforall x (Phobic(x) and Unvaried(x) -> Rowdy(x))\nforall x (Formulary(x) -> Limbed(x))\n\nUnvaried(rasla)\n\ntherefore Unvaried(rasla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Tam is essene. Tam is clannish. Tam is medieval. Tam is barefooted. Tam is inerrant. Hakeem is essene. Hakeem is gyroscopic. Hakeem is clannish. Hakeem is medieval. Lishe is essene. Lishe is gyroscopic. Lishe is gingival. Lishe is clannish. Lishe is medieval. Lishe is barefooted. Lishe is inerrant. Smart, essene people are inerrant. Nice, medieval people are barefooted. All essene people are gingival. Tam is not inerrant.", "logic": "\nEssene(tam)\nClannish(tam)\nMedieval(tam)\nBarefooted(tam)\nInerrant(tam)\nEssene(hakeem)\nGyroscopic(hakeem)\nClannish(hakeem)\nMedieval(hakeem)\nEssene(lishe)\nGyroscopic(lishe)\nGingival(lishe)\nClannish(lishe)\nMedieval(lishe)\nBarefooted(lishe)\nInerrant(lishe)\nforall x (Barefooted(x) and Essene(x) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) and Medieval(x) -> Barefooted(x))\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Gingival(x))\n\nnot Inerrant(tam)\n\ntherefore Inerrant(tam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Nora is unquotable. Nora is unified. Nora is afferent. Nora is ungrasped. Nora is unmalted. Rubetta is unquotable. Rubetta is polysemous. Rubetta is unified. Rubetta is afferent. Xena is unquotable. Xena is polysemous. Xena is lithuanian. Xena is unified. Xena is afferent. Xena is ungrasped. Xena is unmalted. Smart, unquotable people are unmalted. Nice, afferent people are ungrasped. All unquotable people are lithuanian. Nora is lithuanian.", "logic": "\nUnquotable(nora)\nUnified(nora)\nAfferent(nora)\nUngrasped(nora)\nUnmalted(nora)\nUnquotable(rubetta)\nPolysemous(rubetta)\nUnified(rubetta)\nAfferent(rubetta)\nUnquotable(xena)\nPolysemous(xena)\nLithuanian(xena)\nUnified(xena)\nAfferent(xena)\nUngrasped(xena)\nUnmalted(xena)\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) and Unquotable(x) -> Unmalted(x))\nforall x (Polysemous(x) and Afferent(x) -> Ungrasped(x))\nforall x (Unquotable(x) -> Lithuanian(x))\n\nLithuanian(nora)\n\nUnquotable(nora) and forall x (Unquotable(x) -> Lithuanian(x)) -> therefore Lithuanian(nora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Berti is bromidic. Berti is mandatory. Berti is cockeyed. Berti is outlying. Berti is respective. Benjamin is bromidic. Benjamin is shoddy. Benjamin is mandatory. Benjamin is cockeyed. Gwen is bromidic. Gwen is shoddy. Gwen is pseudo. Gwen is mandatory. Gwen is cockeyed. Gwen is outlying. Gwen is respective. Smart, bromidic people are respective. Nice, cockeyed people are outlying. All bromidic people are pseudo. Berti is not pseudo.", "logic": "\nBromidic(berti)\nMandatory(berti)\nCockeyed(berti)\nOutlying(berti)\nRespective(berti)\nBromidic(benjamin)\nShoddy(benjamin)\nMandatory(benjamin)\nCockeyed(benjamin)\nBromidic(gwen)\nShoddy(gwen)\nPseudo(gwen)\nMandatory(gwen)\nCockeyed(gwen)\nOutlying(gwen)\nRespective(gwen)\nforall x (Outlying(x) and Bromidic(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) and Cockeyed(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Bromidic(x) -> Pseudo(x))\n\nnot Pseudo(berti)\n\nBromidic(berti) and forall x (Bromidic(x) -> Pseudo(x)) -> therefore Pseudo(berti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Norrie is myelic. Norrie is damp. Norrie is innate. Norrie is calamitous. Norrie is impatient. Euclid is myelic. Euclid is mediaeval. Euclid is damp. Euclid is innate. Feliza is myelic. Feliza is mediaeval. Feliza is malapropos. Feliza is damp. Feliza is innate. Feliza is calamitous. Feliza is impatient. Smart, myelic people are impatient. Nice, innate people are calamitous. All myelic people are malapropos. Euclid is impatient.", "logic": "\nMyelic(norrie)\nDamp(norrie)\nInnate(norrie)\nCalamitous(norrie)\nImpatient(norrie)\nMyelic(euclid)\nMediaeval(euclid)\nDamp(euclid)\nInnate(euclid)\nMyelic(feliza)\nMediaeval(feliza)\nMalapropos(feliza)\nDamp(feliza)\nInnate(feliza)\nCalamitous(feliza)\nImpatient(feliza)\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Myelic(x) -> Impatient(x))\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) and Innate(x) -> Calamitous(x))\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Malapropos(x))\n\nImpatient(euclid)\n\nMediaeval(euclid) and Innate(euclid) and forall x (Mediaeval(x) and Innate(x) -> Calamitous(x)) -> therefore Calamitous(euclid) Calamitous(euclid) and Myelic(euclid) and forall x (Calamitous(x) and Myelic(x) -> Impatient(x)) -> therefore Impatient(euclid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Eveline is fucking. Eveline is unkindled. Eveline is nauseating. Eveline is somalian. Eveline is dramatic. Florina is fucking. Florina is exulting. Florina is unkindled. Florina is nauseating. Nitin is fucking. Nitin is exulting. Nitin is ethiopian. Nitin is unkindled. Nitin is nauseating. Nitin is somalian. Nitin is dramatic. Smart, fucking people are dramatic. Nice, nauseating people are somalian. All fucking people are ethiopian. Florina is not dramatic.", "logic": "\nFucking(eveline)\nUnkindled(eveline)\nNauseating(eveline)\nSomalian(eveline)\nDramatic(eveline)\nFucking(florina)\nExulting(florina)\nUnkindled(florina)\nNauseating(florina)\nFucking(nitin)\nExulting(nitin)\nEthiopian(nitin)\nUnkindled(nitin)\nNauseating(nitin)\nSomalian(nitin)\nDramatic(nitin)\nforall x (Somalian(x) and Fucking(x) -> Dramatic(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) and Nauseating(x) -> Somalian(x))\nforall x (Fucking(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\n\nnot Dramatic(florina)\n\nExulting(florina) and Nauseating(florina) and forall x (Exulting(x) and Nauseating(x) -> Somalian(x)) -> therefore Somalian(florina) Somalian(florina) and Fucking(florina) and forall x (Somalian(x) and Fucking(x) -> Dramatic(x)) -> therefore Dramatic(florina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Terrell is fractional. Liora is singular. Liora is beguiling. If Terrell is ectozoan and Terrell is singular then Terrell is brainless. Rough things are fractional. All beguiling things are brainless. Big things are ectozoan. All fractional things are singular. All brainless, ectozoan things are beguiling. Liora is beguiling.", "logic": "\nFractional(terrell)\nSingular(liora)\nBeguiling(liora)\nEctozoan(terrell) and Singular(terrell) -> Brainless(terrell)\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Fractional(x))\nforall x (Beguiling(x) -> Brainless(x))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Ectozoan(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Brainless(x) and Ectozoan(x) -> Beguiling(x))\n\nBeguiling(liora)\n\ntherefore Beguiling(liora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Leroy is sown. Hilarie is sylphlike. Hilarie is irritating. If Leroy is dissipated and Leroy is sylphlike then Leroy is vexing. Rough things are sown. All irritating things are vexing. Big things are dissipated. All sown things are sylphlike. All vexing, dissipated things are irritating. Hilarie is not sylphlike.", "logic": "\nSown(leroy)\nSylphlike(hilarie)\nIrritating(hilarie)\nDissipated(leroy) and Sylphlike(leroy) -> Vexing(leroy)\nforall x (Hammered(x) -> Sown(x))\nforall x (Irritating(x) -> Vexing(x))\nforall x (Sylphlike(x) -> Dissipated(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) -> Sylphlike(x))\nforall x (Vexing(x) and Dissipated(x) -> Irritating(x))\n\nnot Sylphlike(hilarie)\n\ntherefore Sylphlike(hilarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Carrol is unbraced. Theodor is unbraced. Theodor is uncounted. If Carrol is bouncy and Carrol is unbraced then Carrol is material. Rough things are unbraced. All uncounted things are material. Big things are bouncy. All unbraced things are unbraced. All material, bouncy things are uncounted. Theodor is material.", "logic": "\nUnbraced(carrol)\nUnbraced(theodor)\nUncounted(theodor)\nBouncy(carrol) and Unbraced(carrol) -> Material(carrol)\nforall x (Dried(x) -> Unbraced(x))\nforall x (Uncounted(x) -> Material(x))\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Bouncy(x))\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Unbraced(x))\nforall x (Material(x) and Bouncy(x) -> Uncounted(x))\n\nMaterial(theodor)\n\nUncounted(theodor) and forall x (Uncounted(x) -> Material(x)) -> therefore Material(theodor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Prisca is humorless. Chariot is brunette. Chariot is specified. If Prisca is atrial and Prisca is brunette then Prisca is exceeding. Rough things are humorless. All specified things are exceeding. Big things are atrial. All humorless things are brunette. All exceeding, atrial things are specified. Prisca is not brunette.", "logic": "\nHumorless(prisca)\nBrunette(chariot)\nSpecified(chariot)\nAtrial(prisca) and Brunette(prisca) -> Exceeding(prisca)\nforall x (Amendatory(x) -> Humorless(x))\nforall x (Specified(x) -> Exceeding(x))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Atrial(x))\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Brunette(x))\nforall x (Exceeding(x) and Atrial(x) -> Specified(x))\n\nnot Brunette(prisca)\n\nHumorless(prisca) and forall x (Humorless(x) -> Brunette(x)) -> therefore Brunette(prisca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Aurea is inodorous. Giralda is plethoric. Giralda is sterile. If Aurea is tensile and Aurea is plethoric then Aurea is despiteful. Rough things are inodorous. All sterile things are despiteful. Big things are tensile. All inodorous things are plethoric. All despiteful, tensile things are sterile. Aurea is tensile.", "logic": "\nInodorous(aurea)\nPlethoric(giralda)\nSterile(giralda)\nTensile(aurea) and Plethoric(aurea) -> Despiteful(aurea)\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Inodorous(x))\nforall x (Sterile(x) -> Despiteful(x))\nforall x (Plethoric(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Inodorous(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nforall x (Despiteful(x) and Tensile(x) -> Sterile(x))\n\nTensile(aurea)\n\nInodorous(aurea) and forall x (Inodorous(x) -> Plethoric(x)) -> therefore Plethoric(aurea) Plethoric(aurea) and forall x (Plethoric(x) -> Tensile(x)) -> therefore Tensile(aurea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Dulsea is urbanised. Durante is undatable. Durante is nonviolent. If Dulsea is jacksonian and Dulsea is undatable then Dulsea is dysphoric. Rough things are urbanised. All nonviolent things are dysphoric. Big things are jacksonian. All urbanised things are undatable. All dysphoric, jacksonian things are nonviolent. Dulsea is not jacksonian.", "logic": "\nUrbanised(dulsea)\nUndatable(durante)\nNonviolent(durante)\nJacksonian(dulsea) and Undatable(dulsea) -> Dysphoric(dulsea)\nforall x (Biface(x) -> Urbanised(x))\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) -> Dysphoric(x))\nforall x (Undatable(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nforall x (Urbanised(x) -> Undatable(x))\nforall x (Dysphoric(x) and Jacksonian(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\n\nnot Jacksonian(dulsea)\n\nUrbanised(dulsea) and forall x (Urbanised(x) -> Undatable(x)) -> therefore Undatable(dulsea) Undatable(dulsea) and forall x (Undatable(x) -> Jacksonian(x)) -> therefore Jacksonian(dulsea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Gene is inside. Keil is extensile. Keil is abnaki. If Gene is overhand and Gene is extensile then Gene is anapestic. Rough things are inside. All abnaki things are anapestic. Big things are overhand. All inside things are extensile. All anapestic, overhand things are abnaki. Gene is anapestic.", "logic": "\nInside(gene)\nExtensile(keil)\nAbnaki(keil)\nOverhand(gene) and Extensile(gene) -> Anapestic(gene)\nforall x (Alleged(x) -> Inside(x))\nforall x (Abnaki(x) -> Anapestic(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) -> Overhand(x))\nforall x (Inside(x) -> Extensile(x))\nforall x (Anapestic(x) and Overhand(x) -> Abnaki(x))\n\nAnapestic(gene)\n\nInside(gene) and forall x (Inside(x) -> Extensile(x)) -> therefore Extensile(gene) Extensile(gene) and forall x (Extensile(x) -> Overhand(x)) -> therefore Overhand(gene) Inside(gene) and forall x (Inside(x) -> Extensile(x)) -> therefore Extensile(gene) Overhand(gene) and Extensile(gene) and Overhand(gene) and Extensile(gene) -> Anapestic(gene) -> therefore Anapestic(gene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Rinaldo is intensive. Olimpia is lengthways. Olimpia is creaky. If Rinaldo is merciless and Rinaldo is lengthways then Rinaldo is molar. Rough things are intensive. All creaky things are molar. Big things are merciless. All intensive things are lengthways. All molar, merciless things are creaky. Rinaldo is not molar.", "logic": "\nIntensive(rinaldo)\nLengthways(olimpia)\nCreaky(olimpia)\nMerciless(rinaldo) and Lengthways(rinaldo) -> Molar(rinaldo)\nforall x (Plumping(x) -> Intensive(x))\nforall x (Creaky(x) -> Molar(x))\nforall x (Lengthways(x) -> Merciless(x))\nforall x (Intensive(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Molar(x) and Merciless(x) -> Creaky(x))\n\nnot Molar(rinaldo)\n\nIntensive(rinaldo) and forall x (Intensive(x) -> Lengthways(x)) -> therefore Lengthways(rinaldo) Lengthways(rinaldo) and forall x (Lengthways(x) -> Merciless(x)) -> therefore Merciless(rinaldo) Intensive(rinaldo) and forall x (Intensive(x) -> Lengthways(x)) -> therefore Lengthways(rinaldo) Merciless(rinaldo) and Lengthways(rinaldo) and Merciless(rinaldo) and Lengthways(rinaldo) -> Molar(rinaldo) -> therefore Molar(rinaldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Roscoe is aspiring. Aurilia is hungry. Aurilia is capacitive. If Roscoe is remindful and Roscoe is hungry then Roscoe is blind. Rough things are aspiring. All capacitive things are blind. Big things are remindful. All aspiring things are hungry. All blind, remindful things are capacitive. Aurilia is not aspiring.", "logic": "\nAspiring(roscoe)\nHungry(aurilia)\nCapacitive(aurilia)\nRemindful(roscoe) and Hungry(roscoe) -> Blind(roscoe)\nforall x (Conceptual(x) -> Aspiring(x))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Hungry(x) -> Remindful(x))\nforall x (Aspiring(x) -> Hungry(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) and Remindful(x) -> Capacitive(x))\n\nnot Aspiring(aurilia)\n\nforall x (Conceptual(x) -> Aspiring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Glennie is cussed. Cain is dismantled. Cain is solved. If Glennie is extendible and Glennie is dismantled then Glennie is horny. Rough things are cussed. All solved things are horny. Big things are extendible. All cussed things are dismantled. All horny, extendible things are solved. Glennie is lithesome.", "logic": "\nCussed(glennie)\nDismantled(cain)\nSolved(cain)\nExtendible(glennie) and Dismantled(glennie) -> Horny(glennie)\nforall x (Lithesome(x) -> Cussed(x))\nforall x (Solved(x) -> Horny(x))\nforall x (Dismantled(x) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Cussed(x) -> Dismantled(x))\nforall x (Horny(x) and Extendible(x) -> Solved(x))\n\nLithesome(glennie)\n\nLithesome(glennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Celisse is nonaligned. Rori is less. Rori is ended. If Celisse is amethyst and Celisse is less then Celisse is countless. Rough things are nonaligned. All ended things are countless. Big things are amethyst. All nonaligned things are less. All countless, amethyst things are ended. Rori is not hellenic.", "logic": "\nNonaligned(celisse)\nLess(rori)\nEnded(rori)\nAmethyst(celisse) and Less(celisse) -> Countless(celisse)\nforall x (Hellenic(x) -> Nonaligned(x))\nforall x (Ended(x) -> Countless(x))\nforall x (Less(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nforall x (Nonaligned(x) -> Less(x))\nforall x (Countless(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Ended(x))\n\nnot Hellenic(rori)\n\nnot Hellenic(rori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Chantalle is sublime. Corby is assertable. Corby is homogenous. If Chantalle is attenuated and Chantalle is assertable then Chantalle is attacking. Rough things are sublime. All homogenous things are attacking. Big things are attenuated. All sublime things are assertable. All attacking, attenuated things are homogenous. Corby is blue.", "logic": "\nSublime(chantalle)\nAssertable(corby)\nHomogenous(corby)\nAttenuated(chantalle) and Assertable(chantalle) -> Attacking(chantalle)\nforall x (Uncurved(x) -> Sublime(x))\nforall x (Homogenous(x) -> Attacking(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Attenuated(x))\nforall x (Sublime(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) and Attenuated(x) -> Homogenous(x))\n\nBlue(corby)\n\nBlue(corby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-37"} {"premises": "Emiline is romanist. Emiline is not monstrous. Emiline is citrous. Emiline is pawky. Derk is fighting. Derk is citrous. Derk is slumbery. Derk is unsaddled. Ola is fighting. Ola is not slumbery. Denys is fighting. Denys is romanist. Denys is monstrous. Denys is citrous. Denys is pawky. If someone is romanist and not monstrous then they are pawky. If someone is unsaddled and not citrous then they are pawky. If Derk is not romanist then Derk is not unsaddled. Emiline is pawky.", "logic": "\nRomanist(emiline)\nnot Monstrous(emiline)\nCitrous(emiline)\nPawky(emiline)\nFighting(derk)\nCitrous(derk)\nSlumbery(derk)\nUnsaddled(derk)\nFighting(ola)\nnot Slumbery(ola)\nFighting(denys)\nRomanist(denys)\nMonstrous(denys)\nCitrous(denys)\nPawky(denys)\nforall x (Romanist(x) and not Monstrous(x) -> Pawky(x))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) and not Citrous(x) -> Pawky(x))\nnot Romanist(derk) -> not Unsaddled(derk)\n\nPawky(emiline)\n\ntherefore Pawky(emiline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-455"} {"premises": "Andromeda is pluperfect. Andromeda is not clammy. Andromeda is primeval. Andromeda is maroc. Lynna is bodacious. Lynna is primeval. Lynna is moronic. Lynna is simplistic. Harriett is bodacious. Harriett is not moronic. Udale is bodacious. Udale is pluperfect. Udale is clammy. Udale is primeval. Udale is maroc. If someone is pluperfect and not clammy then they are maroc. If someone is simplistic and not primeval then they are maroc. If Lynna is not pluperfect then Lynna is not simplistic. Udale is not bodacious.", "logic": "\nPluperfect(andromeda)\nnot Clammy(andromeda)\nPrimeval(andromeda)\nMaroc(andromeda)\nBodacious(lynna)\nPrimeval(lynna)\nMoronic(lynna)\nSimplistic(lynna)\nBodacious(harriett)\nnot Moronic(harriett)\nBodacious(udale)\nPluperfect(udale)\nClammy(udale)\nPrimeval(udale)\nMaroc(udale)\nforall x (Pluperfect(x) and not Clammy(x) -> Maroc(x))\nforall x (Simplistic(x) and not Primeval(x) -> Maroc(x))\nnot Pluperfect(lynna) -> not Simplistic(lynna)\n\nnot Bodacious(udale)\n\ntherefore Bodacious(udale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-455"} {"premises": "Uriel is tractile. Uriel is not semisolid. Uriel is errant. Uriel is faced. Elvira is dextrorsal. Elvira is errant. Elvira is unmated. Elvira is denotative. Anet is dextrorsal. Anet is not unmated. Jack is dextrorsal. Jack is tractile. Jack is semisolid. Jack is errant. Jack is faced. If someone is tractile and not semisolid then they are faced. If someone is denotative and not errant then they are faced. If Elvira is not tractile then Elvira is not denotative. Elvira is not faced.", "logic": "\nTractile(uriel)\nnot Semisolid(uriel)\nErrant(uriel)\nFaced(uriel)\nDextrorsal(elvira)\nErrant(elvira)\nUnmated(elvira)\nDenotative(elvira)\nDextrorsal(anet)\nnot Unmated(anet)\nDextrorsal(jack)\nTractile(jack)\nSemisolid(jack)\nErrant(jack)\nFaced(jack)\nforall x (Tractile(x) and not Semisolid(x) -> Faced(x))\nforall x (Denotative(x) and not Errant(x) -> Faced(x))\nnot Tractile(elvira) -> not Denotative(elvira)\n\nnot Faced(elvira)\n\nforall x (Tractile(x) and not Semisolid(x) -> Faced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-455"} {"premises": "Mada is obviating. Mada is not contrary. Mada is evasive. Mada is germy. Fleurette is pomaded. Fleurette is evasive. Fleurette is stinting. Fleurette is catchy. Susette is pomaded. Susette is not stinting. Nickolas is pomaded. Nickolas is obviating. Nickolas is contrary. Nickolas is evasive. Nickolas is germy. If someone is obviating and not contrary then they are germy. If someone is catchy and not evasive then they are germy. If Fleurette is not obviating then Fleurette is not catchy. Susette is obviating.", "logic": "\nObviating(mada)\nnot Contrary(mada)\nEvasive(mada)\nGermy(mada)\nPomaded(fleurette)\nEvasive(fleurette)\nStinting(fleurette)\nCatchy(fleurette)\nPomaded(susette)\nnot Stinting(susette)\nPomaded(nickolas)\nObviating(nickolas)\nContrary(nickolas)\nEvasive(nickolas)\nGermy(nickolas)\nforall x (Obviating(x) and not Contrary(x) -> Germy(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) and not Evasive(x) -> Germy(x))\nnot Obviating(fleurette) -> not Catchy(fleurette)\n\nObviating(susette)\n\nObviating(susette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-455"} {"premises": "The normand is exclusive. The normand is munificent. The normand is grubby. The normand is bumptious. The normand is stochastic. The normand scamp the kaye. The normand afflict the kaye. The normand roll the kaye. The kaye is exclusive. The kaye is grubby. The kaye is bumptious. The kaye is stochastic. The kaye scamp the normand. The kaye afflict the normand. The kaye roll the normand. If something afflict the kaye then it is bumptious. If something afflict the normand and it is grubby then it roll the normand. If the normand roll the kaye then the kaye afflict the normand. If something roll the normand and it scamp the kaye then it scamp the normand. If something roll the kaye and it afflict the kaye then the kaye afflict the normand. If something is munificent and stochastic then it afflict the kaye. If something afflict the normand then it is bumptious. If something is munificent then it afflict the normand. The normand is bumptious.", "logic": "\nExclusive(normand)\nMunificent(normand)\nGrubby(normand)\nBumptious(normand)\nStochastic(normand)\nScamp(normand, kaye)\nAfflict(normand, kaye)\nRoll(normand, kaye)\nExclusive(kaye)\nGrubby(kaye)\nBumptious(kaye)\nStochastic(kaye)\nScamp(kaye, normand)\nAfflict(kaye, normand)\nRoll(kaye, normand)\nforall x (Afflict(x, kaye) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Afflict(x, normand) and Grubby(x) -> Roll(x, normand))\nRoll(normand, kaye) -> Afflict(kaye, normand)\nforall x (Roll(x, normand) and Scamp(x, kaye) -> Scamp(x, normand))\nforall x (Roll(x, kaye) and Afflict(x, kaye) -> Afflict(kaye, normand))\nforall x (Munificent(x) and Stochastic(x) -> Afflict(x, kaye))\nforall x (Afflict(x, normand) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Afflict(x, normand))\n\nBumptious(normand)\n\ntherefore Bumptious(normand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The maryanne is fretted. The maryanne is wriggling. The maryanne is fatless. The maryanne is recent. The maryanne is adroit. The maryanne hulk the verne. The maryanne flag the verne. The maryanne secrete the verne. The verne is fretted. The verne is fatless. The verne is recent. The verne is adroit. The verne hulk the maryanne. The verne flag the maryanne. The verne secrete the maryanne. If something flag the verne then it is recent. If something flag the maryanne and it is fatless then it secrete the maryanne. If the maryanne secrete the verne then the verne flag the maryanne. If something secrete the maryanne and it hulk the verne then it hulk the maryanne. If something secrete the verne and it flag the verne then the verne flag the maryanne. If something is wriggling and adroit then it flag the verne. If something flag the maryanne then it is recent. If something is wriggling then it flag the maryanne. The maryanne does not see the verne.", "logic": "\nFretted(maryanne)\nWriggling(maryanne)\nFatless(maryanne)\nRecent(maryanne)\nAdroit(maryanne)\nHulk(maryanne, verne)\nFlag(maryanne, verne)\nSecrete(maryanne, verne)\nFretted(verne)\nFatless(verne)\nRecent(verne)\nAdroit(verne)\nHulk(verne, maryanne)\nFlag(verne, maryanne)\nSecrete(verne, maryanne)\nforall x (Flag(x, verne) -> Recent(x))\nforall x (Flag(x, maryanne) and Fatless(x) -> Secrete(x, maryanne))\nSecrete(maryanne, verne) -> Flag(verne, maryanne)\nforall x (Secrete(x, maryanne) and Hulk(x, verne) -> Hulk(x, maryanne))\nforall x (Secrete(x, verne) and Flag(x, verne) -> Flag(verne, maryanne))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) and Adroit(x) -> Flag(x, verne))\nforall x (Flag(x, maryanne) -> Recent(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Flag(x, maryanne))\n\nnot Flag(maryanne, verne)\n\ntherefore Flag(maryanne, verne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The dot is erstwhile. The dot is chantlike. The dot is hysteric. The dot is darkening. The dot is lackluster. The dot decry the maure. The dot admonish the maure. The dot invalid the maure. The maure is erstwhile. The maure is hysteric. The maure is darkening. The maure is lackluster. The maure decry the dot. The maure admonish the dot. The maure invalid the dot. If something admonish the maure then it is darkening. If something admonish the dot and it is hysteric then it invalid the dot. If the dot invalid the maure then the maure admonish the dot. If something invalid the dot and it decry the maure then it decry the dot. If something invalid the maure and it admonish the maure then the maure admonish the dot. If something is chantlike and lackluster then it admonish the maure. If something admonish the dot then it is darkening. If something is chantlike then it admonish the dot. The dot admonish the dot.", "logic": "\nErstwhile(dot)\nChantlike(dot)\nHysteric(dot)\nDarkening(dot)\nLackluster(dot)\nDecry(dot, maure)\nAdmonish(dot, maure)\nInvalid(dot, maure)\nErstwhile(maure)\nHysteric(maure)\nDarkening(maure)\nLackluster(maure)\nDecry(maure, dot)\nAdmonish(maure, dot)\nInvalid(maure, dot)\nforall x (Admonish(x, maure) -> Darkening(x))\nforall x (Admonish(x, dot) and Hysteric(x) -> Invalid(x, dot))\nInvalid(dot, maure) -> Admonish(maure, dot)\nforall x (Invalid(x, dot) and Decry(x, maure) -> Decry(x, dot))\nforall x (Invalid(x, maure) and Admonish(x, maure) -> Admonish(maure, dot))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) and Lackluster(x) -> Admonish(x, maure))\nforall x (Admonish(x, dot) -> Darkening(x))\nforall x (Chantlike(x) -> Admonish(x, dot))\n\nAdmonish(dot, dot)\n\nChantlike(dot) and forall x (Chantlike(x) -> Admonish(x, dot)) -> therefore Admonish(dot, dot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The kurtis is strapless. The kurtis is symmetric. The kurtis is sublimated. The kurtis is holophytic. The kurtis is liveable. The kurtis backslap the leonanie. The kurtis stroll the leonanie. The kurtis negative the leonanie. The leonanie is strapless. The leonanie is sublimated. The leonanie is holophytic. The leonanie is liveable. The leonanie backslap the kurtis. The leonanie stroll the kurtis. The leonanie negative the kurtis. If something stroll the leonanie then it is holophytic. If something stroll the kurtis and it is sublimated then it negative the kurtis. If the kurtis negative the leonanie then the leonanie stroll the kurtis. If something negative the kurtis and it backslap the leonanie then it backslap the kurtis. If something negative the leonanie and it stroll the leonanie then the leonanie stroll the kurtis. If something is symmetric and liveable then it stroll the leonanie. If something stroll the kurtis then it is holophytic. If something is symmetric then it stroll the kurtis. The kurtis does not see the kurtis.", "logic": "\nStrapless(kurtis)\nSymmetric(kurtis)\nSublimated(kurtis)\nHolophytic(kurtis)\nLiveable(kurtis)\nBackslap(kurtis, leonanie)\nStroll(kurtis, leonanie)\nNegative(kurtis, leonanie)\nStrapless(leonanie)\nSublimated(leonanie)\nHolophytic(leonanie)\nLiveable(leonanie)\nBackslap(leonanie, kurtis)\nStroll(leonanie, kurtis)\nNegative(leonanie, kurtis)\nforall x (Stroll(x, leonanie) -> Holophytic(x))\nforall x (Stroll(x, kurtis) and Sublimated(x) -> Negative(x, kurtis))\nNegative(kurtis, leonanie) -> Stroll(leonanie, kurtis)\nforall x (Negative(x, kurtis) and Backslap(x, leonanie) -> Backslap(x, kurtis))\nforall x (Negative(x, leonanie) and Stroll(x, leonanie) -> Stroll(leonanie, kurtis))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and Liveable(x) -> Stroll(x, leonanie))\nforall x (Stroll(x, kurtis) -> Holophytic(x))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Stroll(x, kurtis))\n\nnot Stroll(kurtis, kurtis)\n\nSymmetric(kurtis) and forall x (Symmetric(x) -> Stroll(x, kurtis)) -> therefore Stroll(kurtis, kurtis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The jeremy is smoldering. The jeremy is massive. The jeremy is dilute. The jeremy is sozzled. The jeremy is boyish. The jeremy patch the ninon. The jeremy squirt the ninon. The jeremy befool the ninon. The ninon is smoldering. The ninon is dilute. The ninon is sozzled. The ninon is boyish. The ninon patch the jeremy. The ninon squirt the jeremy. The ninon befool the jeremy. If something squirt the ninon then it is sozzled. If something squirt the jeremy and it is dilute then it befool the jeremy. If the jeremy befool the ninon then the ninon squirt the jeremy. If something befool the jeremy and it patch the ninon then it patch the jeremy. If something befool the ninon and it squirt the ninon then the ninon squirt the jeremy. If something is massive and boyish then it squirt the ninon. If something squirt the jeremy then it is sozzled. If something is massive then it squirt the jeremy. The jeremy befool the jeremy.", "logic": "\nSmoldering(jeremy)\nMassive(jeremy)\nDilute(jeremy)\nSozzled(jeremy)\nBoyish(jeremy)\nPatch(jeremy, ninon)\nSquirt(jeremy, ninon)\nBefool(jeremy, ninon)\nSmoldering(ninon)\nDilute(ninon)\nSozzled(ninon)\nBoyish(ninon)\nPatch(ninon, jeremy)\nSquirt(ninon, jeremy)\nBefool(ninon, jeremy)\nforall x (Squirt(x, ninon) -> Sozzled(x))\nforall x (Squirt(x, jeremy) and Dilute(x) -> Befool(x, jeremy))\nBefool(jeremy, ninon) -> Squirt(ninon, jeremy)\nforall x (Befool(x, jeremy) and Patch(x, ninon) -> Patch(x, jeremy))\nforall x (Befool(x, ninon) and Squirt(x, ninon) -> Squirt(ninon, jeremy))\nforall x (Massive(x) and Boyish(x) -> Squirt(x, ninon))\nforall x (Squirt(x, jeremy) -> Sozzled(x))\nforall x (Massive(x) -> Squirt(x, jeremy))\n\nBefool(jeremy, jeremy)\n\nMassive(jeremy) and forall x (Massive(x) -> Squirt(x, jeremy)) -> therefore Squirt(jeremy, jeremy) Squirt(jeremy, jeremy) and Dilute(jeremy) and forall x (Squirt(x, jeremy) and Dilute(x) -> Befool(x, jeremy)) -> therefore Befool(jeremy, jeremy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The sharra is cancerous. The sharra is brimming. The sharra is indian. The sharra is minuscular. The sharra is disposed. The sharra handbuild the josie. The sharra cringe the josie. The sharra cantillate the josie. The josie is cancerous. The josie is indian. The josie is minuscular. The josie is disposed. The josie handbuild the sharra. The josie cringe the sharra. The josie cantillate the sharra. If something cringe the josie then it is minuscular. If something cringe the sharra and it is indian then it cantillate the sharra. If the sharra cantillate the josie then the josie cringe the sharra. If something cantillate the sharra and it handbuild the josie then it handbuild the sharra. If something cantillate the josie and it cringe the josie then the josie cringe the sharra. If something is brimming and disposed then it cringe the josie. If something cringe the sharra then it is minuscular. If something is brimming then it cringe the sharra. The sharra does not visit the sharra.", "logic": "\nCancerous(sharra)\nBrimming(sharra)\nIndian(sharra)\nMinuscular(sharra)\nDisposed(sharra)\nHandbuild(sharra, josie)\nCringe(sharra, josie)\nCantillate(sharra, josie)\nCancerous(josie)\nIndian(josie)\nMinuscular(josie)\nDisposed(josie)\nHandbuild(josie, sharra)\nCringe(josie, sharra)\nCantillate(josie, sharra)\nforall x (Cringe(x, josie) -> Minuscular(x))\nforall x (Cringe(x, sharra) and Indian(x) -> Cantillate(x, sharra))\nCantillate(sharra, josie) -> Cringe(josie, sharra)\nforall x (Cantillate(x, sharra) and Handbuild(x, josie) -> Handbuild(x, sharra))\nforall x (Cantillate(x, josie) and Cringe(x, josie) -> Cringe(josie, sharra))\nforall x (Brimming(x) and Disposed(x) -> Cringe(x, josie))\nforall x (Cringe(x, sharra) -> Minuscular(x))\nforall x (Brimming(x) -> Cringe(x, sharra))\n\nnot Cantillate(sharra, sharra)\n\nBrimming(sharra) and forall x (Brimming(x) -> Cringe(x, sharra)) -> therefore Cringe(sharra, sharra) Cringe(sharra, sharra) and Indian(sharra) and forall x (Cringe(x, sharra) and Indian(x) -> Cantillate(x, sharra)) -> therefore Cantillate(sharra, sharra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The broderic is correlate. The broderic is redeeming. The broderic is sluicing. The broderic is nonstop. The broderic is burbly. The broderic horrify the aaron. The broderic thresh the aaron. The broderic misdeal the aaron. The aaron is correlate. The aaron is sluicing. The aaron is nonstop. The aaron is burbly. The aaron horrify the broderic. The aaron thresh the broderic. The aaron misdeal the broderic. If something thresh the aaron then it is nonstop. If something thresh the broderic and it is sluicing then it misdeal the broderic. If the broderic misdeal the aaron then the aaron thresh the broderic. If something misdeal the broderic and it horrify the aaron then it horrify the broderic. If something misdeal the aaron and it thresh the aaron then the aaron thresh the broderic. If something is redeeming and burbly then it thresh the aaron. If something thresh the broderic then it is nonstop. If something is redeeming then it thresh the broderic. The broderic horrify the broderic.", "logic": "\nCorrelate(broderic)\nRedeeming(broderic)\nSluicing(broderic)\nNonstop(broderic)\nBurbly(broderic)\nHorrify(broderic, aaron)\nThresh(broderic, aaron)\nMisdeal(broderic, aaron)\nCorrelate(aaron)\nSluicing(aaron)\nNonstop(aaron)\nBurbly(aaron)\nHorrify(aaron, broderic)\nThresh(aaron, broderic)\nMisdeal(aaron, broderic)\nforall x (Thresh(x, aaron) -> Nonstop(x))\nforall x (Thresh(x, broderic) and Sluicing(x) -> Misdeal(x, broderic))\nMisdeal(broderic, aaron) -> Thresh(aaron, broderic)\nforall x (Misdeal(x, broderic) and Horrify(x, aaron) -> Horrify(x, broderic))\nforall x (Misdeal(x, aaron) and Thresh(x, aaron) -> Thresh(aaron, broderic))\nforall x (Redeeming(x) and Burbly(x) -> Thresh(x, aaron))\nforall x (Thresh(x, broderic) -> Nonstop(x))\nforall x (Redeeming(x) -> Thresh(x, broderic))\n\nHorrify(broderic, broderic)\n\nRedeeming(broderic) and forall x (Redeeming(x) -> Thresh(x, broderic)) -> therefore Thresh(broderic, broderic) Thresh(broderic, broderic) and Sluicing(broderic) and forall x (Thresh(x, broderic) and Sluicing(x) -> Misdeal(x, broderic)) -> therefore Misdeal(broderic, broderic) Misdeal(broderic, broderic) and Horrify(broderic, aaron) and forall x (Misdeal(x, broderic) and Horrify(x, aaron) -> Horrify(x, broderic)) -> therefore Horrify(broderic, broderic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The hamlet is botswanan. The hamlet is exultant. The hamlet is cyprian. The hamlet is nitid. The hamlet is assisted. The hamlet debouch the yardley. The hamlet lustrate the yardley. The hamlet substitute the yardley. The yardley is botswanan. The yardley is cyprian. The yardley is nitid. The yardley is assisted. The yardley debouch the hamlet. The yardley lustrate the hamlet. The yardley substitute the hamlet. If something lustrate the yardley then it is nitid. If something lustrate the hamlet and it is cyprian then it substitute the hamlet. If the hamlet substitute the yardley then the yardley lustrate the hamlet. If something substitute the hamlet and it debouch the yardley then it debouch the hamlet. If something substitute the yardley and it lustrate the yardley then the yardley lustrate the hamlet. If something is exultant and assisted then it lustrate the yardley. If something lustrate the hamlet then it is nitid. If something is exultant then it lustrate the hamlet. The hamlet does not like the hamlet.", "logic": "\nBotswanan(hamlet)\nExultant(hamlet)\nCyprian(hamlet)\nNitid(hamlet)\nAssisted(hamlet)\nDebouch(hamlet, yardley)\nLustrate(hamlet, yardley)\nSubstitute(hamlet, yardley)\nBotswanan(yardley)\nCyprian(yardley)\nNitid(yardley)\nAssisted(yardley)\nDebouch(yardley, hamlet)\nLustrate(yardley, hamlet)\nSubstitute(yardley, hamlet)\nforall x (Lustrate(x, yardley) -> Nitid(x))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, hamlet) and Cyprian(x) -> Substitute(x, hamlet))\nSubstitute(hamlet, yardley) -> Lustrate(yardley, hamlet)\nforall x (Substitute(x, hamlet) and Debouch(x, yardley) -> Debouch(x, hamlet))\nforall x (Substitute(x, yardley) and Lustrate(x, yardley) -> Lustrate(yardley, hamlet))\nforall x (Exultant(x) and Assisted(x) -> Lustrate(x, yardley))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, hamlet) -> Nitid(x))\nforall x (Exultant(x) -> Lustrate(x, hamlet))\n\nnot Debouch(hamlet, hamlet)\n\nExultant(hamlet) and forall x (Exultant(x) -> Lustrate(x, hamlet)) -> therefore Lustrate(hamlet, hamlet) Lustrate(hamlet, hamlet) and Cyprian(hamlet) and forall x (Lustrate(x, hamlet) and Cyprian(x) -> Substitute(x, hamlet)) -> therefore Substitute(hamlet, hamlet) Substitute(hamlet, hamlet) and Debouch(hamlet, yardley) and forall x (Substitute(x, hamlet) and Debouch(x, yardley) -> Debouch(x, hamlet)) -> therefore Debouch(hamlet, hamlet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The niki is branchial. The niki is heartening. The niki is moorish. The niki is scarlet. The niki is pupillary. The niki concenter the bria. The niki adapt the bria. The niki compel the bria. The bria is branchial. The bria is moorish. The bria is scarlet. The bria is pupillary. The bria concenter the niki. The bria adapt the niki. The bria compel the niki. If something adapt the bria then it is scarlet. If something adapt the niki and it is moorish then it compel the niki. If the niki compel the bria then the bria adapt the niki. If something compel the niki and it concenter the bria then it concenter the niki. If something compel the bria and it adapt the bria then the bria adapt the niki. If something is heartening and pupillary then it adapt the bria. If something adapt the niki then it is scarlet. If something is heartening then it adapt the niki. The bria does not see the bria.", "logic": "\nBranchial(niki)\nHeartening(niki)\nMoorish(niki)\nScarlet(niki)\nPupillary(niki)\nConcenter(niki, bria)\nAdapt(niki, bria)\nCompel(niki, bria)\nBranchial(bria)\nMoorish(bria)\nScarlet(bria)\nPupillary(bria)\nConcenter(bria, niki)\nAdapt(bria, niki)\nCompel(bria, niki)\nforall x (Adapt(x, bria) -> Scarlet(x))\nforall x (Adapt(x, niki) and Moorish(x) -> Compel(x, niki))\nCompel(niki, bria) -> Adapt(bria, niki)\nforall x (Compel(x, niki) and Concenter(x, bria) -> Concenter(x, niki))\nforall x (Compel(x, bria) and Adapt(x, bria) -> Adapt(bria, niki))\nforall x (Heartening(x) and Pupillary(x) -> Adapt(x, bria))\nforall x (Adapt(x, niki) -> Scarlet(x))\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> Adapt(x, niki))\n\nnot Adapt(bria, bria)\n\nforall x (Heartening(x) and Pupillary(x) -> Adapt(x, bria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The odelinda is unshoed. The odelinda is dyspeptic. The odelinda is flukey. The odelinda is standard. The odelinda is jangling. The odelinda prefer the rickey. The odelinda advise the rickey. The odelinda yodel the rickey. The rickey is unshoed. The rickey is flukey. The rickey is standard. The rickey is jangling. The rickey prefer the odelinda. The rickey advise the odelinda. The rickey yodel the odelinda. If something advise the rickey then it is standard. If something advise the odelinda and it is flukey then it yodel the odelinda. If the odelinda yodel the rickey then the rickey advise the odelinda. If something yodel the odelinda and it prefer the rickey then it prefer the odelinda. If something yodel the rickey and it advise the rickey then the rickey advise the odelinda. If something is dyspeptic and jangling then it advise the rickey. If something advise the odelinda then it is standard. If something is dyspeptic then it advise the odelinda. The rickey is dyspeptic.", "logic": "\nUnshoed(odelinda)\nDyspeptic(odelinda)\nFlukey(odelinda)\nStandard(odelinda)\nJangling(odelinda)\nPrefer(odelinda, rickey)\nAdvise(odelinda, rickey)\nYodel(odelinda, rickey)\nUnshoed(rickey)\nFlukey(rickey)\nStandard(rickey)\nJangling(rickey)\nPrefer(rickey, odelinda)\nAdvise(rickey, odelinda)\nYodel(rickey, odelinda)\nforall x (Advise(x, rickey) -> Standard(x))\nforall x (Advise(x, odelinda) and Flukey(x) -> Yodel(x, odelinda))\nYodel(odelinda, rickey) -> Advise(rickey, odelinda)\nforall x (Yodel(x, odelinda) and Prefer(x, rickey) -> Prefer(x, odelinda))\nforall x (Yodel(x, rickey) and Advise(x, rickey) -> Advise(rickey, odelinda))\nforall x (Dyspeptic(x) and Jangling(x) -> Advise(x, rickey))\nforall x (Advise(x, odelinda) -> Standard(x))\nforall x (Dyspeptic(x) -> Advise(x, odelinda))\n\nDyspeptic(rickey)\n\nDyspeptic(rickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The veda is lissom. The veda is knotty. The veda is exuvial. The veda is intricate. The veda is overriding. The veda cinematise the fleurette. The veda incurvate the fleurette. The veda ejaculate the fleurette. The fleurette is lissom. The fleurette is exuvial. The fleurette is intricate. The fleurette is overriding. The fleurette cinematise the veda. The fleurette incurvate the veda. The fleurette ejaculate the veda. If something incurvate the fleurette then it is intricate. If something incurvate the veda and it is exuvial then it ejaculate the veda. If the veda ejaculate the fleurette then the fleurette incurvate the veda. If something ejaculate the veda and it cinematise the fleurette then it cinematise the veda. If something ejaculate the fleurette and it incurvate the fleurette then the fleurette incurvate the veda. If something is knotty and overriding then it incurvate the fleurette. If something incurvate the veda then it is intricate. If something is knotty then it incurvate the veda. The fleurette does not like the fleurette.", "logic": "\nLissom(veda)\nKnotty(veda)\nExuvial(veda)\nIntricate(veda)\nOverriding(veda)\nCinematise(veda, fleurette)\nIncurvate(veda, fleurette)\nEjaculate(veda, fleurette)\nLissom(fleurette)\nExuvial(fleurette)\nIntricate(fleurette)\nOverriding(fleurette)\nCinematise(fleurette, veda)\nIncurvate(fleurette, veda)\nEjaculate(fleurette, veda)\nforall x (Incurvate(x, fleurette) -> Intricate(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, veda) and Exuvial(x) -> Ejaculate(x, veda))\nEjaculate(veda, fleurette) -> Incurvate(fleurette, veda)\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, veda) and Cinematise(x, fleurette) -> Cinematise(x, veda))\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, fleurette) and Incurvate(x, fleurette) -> Incurvate(fleurette, veda))\nforall x (Knotty(x) and Overriding(x) -> Incurvate(x, fleurette))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, veda) -> Intricate(x))\nforall x (Knotty(x) -> Incurvate(x, veda))\n\nnot Cinematise(fleurette, fleurette)\n\nnot Cinematise(fleurette, fleurette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The spense is couthie. The spense is mournful. The spense is lebanese. The spense is icelandic. The spense is carmine. The spense eventuate the barn. The spense liquidise the barn. The spense concede the barn. The barn is couthie. The barn is lebanese. The barn is icelandic. The barn is carmine. The barn eventuate the spense. The barn liquidise the spense. The barn concede the spense. If something liquidise the barn then it is icelandic. If something liquidise the spense and it is lebanese then it concede the spense. If the spense concede the barn then the barn liquidise the spense. If something concede the spense and it eventuate the barn then it eventuate the spense. If something concede the barn and it liquidise the barn then the barn liquidise the spense. If something is mournful and carmine then it liquidise the barn. If something liquidise the spense then it is icelandic. If something is mournful then it liquidise the spense. The barn concede the barn.", "logic": "\nCouthie(spense)\nMournful(spense)\nLebanese(spense)\nIcelandic(spense)\nCarmine(spense)\nEventuate(spense, barn)\nLiquidise(spense, barn)\nConcede(spense, barn)\nCouthie(barn)\nLebanese(barn)\nIcelandic(barn)\nCarmine(barn)\nEventuate(barn, spense)\nLiquidise(barn, spense)\nConcede(barn, spense)\nforall x (Liquidise(x, barn) -> Icelandic(x))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, spense) and Lebanese(x) -> Concede(x, spense))\nConcede(spense, barn) -> Liquidise(barn, spense)\nforall x (Concede(x, spense) and Eventuate(x, barn) -> Eventuate(x, spense))\nforall x (Concede(x, barn) and Liquidise(x, barn) -> Liquidise(barn, spense))\nforall x (Mournful(x) and Carmine(x) -> Liquidise(x, barn))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, spense) -> Icelandic(x))\nforall x (Mournful(x) -> Liquidise(x, spense))\n\nConcede(barn, barn)\n\nConcede(barn, barn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-412"} {"premises": "The fifine is unreadable. If the fifine is bats then the fifine is resolute. If something is bats and styleless then it is resolute. If something is styleless then it is not bats. If something is beloved then it is bats. If something is resolute and not styleless then it is bats. Kind things are unreadable. All unreadable things are beloved. If something is bats and not styleless then it is beloved. The fifine is unreadable.", "logic": "\nUnreadable(fifine)\nBats(fifine) -> Resolute(fifine)\nforall x (Bats(x) and Styleless(x) -> Resolute(x))\nforall x (Styleless(x) -> not Bats(x))\nforall x (Beloved(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Resolute(x) and not Styleless(x) -> Bats(x))\nforall x (Beloved(x) -> Unreadable(x))\nforall x (Unreadable(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Bats(x) and not Styleless(x) -> Beloved(x))\n\nUnreadable(fifine)\n\ntherefore Unreadable(fifine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The dixie is bacteroid. If the dixie is consuming then the dixie is graded. If something is consuming and secondhand then it is graded. If something is secondhand then it is not consuming. If something is hexangular then it is consuming. If something is graded and not secondhand then it is consuming. Kind things are bacteroid. All bacteroid things are hexangular. If something is consuming and not secondhand then it is hexangular. The dixie is not bacteroid.", "logic": "\nBacteroid(dixie)\nConsuming(dixie) -> Graded(dixie)\nforall x (Consuming(x) and Secondhand(x) -> Graded(x))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) -> not Consuming(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Graded(x) and not Secondhand(x) -> Consuming(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) -> Bacteroid(x))\nforall x (Bacteroid(x) -> Hexangular(x))\nforall x (Consuming(x) and not Secondhand(x) -> Hexangular(x))\n\nnot Bacteroid(dixie)\n\ntherefore Bacteroid(dixie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The hermine is unmade. If the hermine is diminished then the hermine is variform. If something is diminished and fruiting then it is variform. If something is fruiting then it is not diminished. If something is raining then it is diminished. If something is variform and not fruiting then it is diminished. Kind things are unmade. All unmade things are raining. If something is diminished and not fruiting then it is raining. The hermine is raining.", "logic": "\nUnmade(hermine)\nDiminished(hermine) -> Variform(hermine)\nforall x (Diminished(x) and Fruiting(x) -> Variform(x))\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> not Diminished(x))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> Diminished(x))\nforall x (Variform(x) and not Fruiting(x) -> Diminished(x))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> Unmade(x))\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Raining(x))\nforall x (Diminished(x) and not Fruiting(x) -> Raining(x))\n\nRaining(hermine)\n\nUnmade(hermine) and forall x (Unmade(x) -> Raining(x)) -> therefore Raining(hermine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The rochette is tensile. If the rochette is sulfuric then the rochette is stripped. If something is sulfuric and alkylic then it is stripped. If something is alkylic then it is not sulfuric. If something is mirrored then it is sulfuric. If something is stripped and not alkylic then it is sulfuric. Kind things are tensile. All tensile things are mirrored. If something is sulfuric and not alkylic then it is mirrored. The rochette is not mirrored.", "logic": "\nTensile(rochette)\nSulfuric(rochette) -> Stripped(rochette)\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) and Alkylic(x) -> Stripped(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> not Sulfuric(x))\nforall x (Mirrored(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\nforall x (Stripped(x) and not Alkylic(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\nforall x (Mirrored(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Tensile(x) -> Mirrored(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) and not Alkylic(x) -> Mirrored(x))\n\nnot Mirrored(rochette)\n\nTensile(rochette) and forall x (Tensile(x) -> Mirrored(x)) -> therefore Mirrored(rochette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The antonino is throwback. If the antonino is cinerary then the antonino is horizontal. If something is cinerary and nosed then it is horizontal. If something is nosed then it is not cinerary. If something is branchy then it is cinerary. If something is horizontal and not nosed then it is cinerary. Kind things are throwback. All throwback things are branchy. If something is cinerary and not nosed then it is branchy. The antonino is cinerary.", "logic": "\nThrowback(antonino)\nCinerary(antonino) -> Horizontal(antonino)\nforall x (Cinerary(x) and Nosed(x) -> Horizontal(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> not Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Horizontal(x) and not Nosed(x) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Throwback(x))\nforall x (Throwback(x) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) and not Nosed(x) -> Branchy(x))\n\nCinerary(antonino)\n\nThrowback(antonino) and forall x (Throwback(x) -> Branchy(x)) -> therefore Branchy(antonino) Branchy(antonino) and forall x (Branchy(x) -> Cinerary(x)) -> therefore Cinerary(antonino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The danyette is cusped. If the danyette is anabiotic then the danyette is debasing. If something is anabiotic and yokelish then it is debasing. If something is yokelish then it is not anabiotic. If something is quondam then it is anabiotic. If something is debasing and not yokelish then it is anabiotic. Kind things are cusped. All cusped things are quondam. If something is anabiotic and not yokelish then it is quondam. The danyette is not anabiotic.", "logic": "\nCusped(danyette)\nAnabiotic(danyette) -> Debasing(danyette)\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and Yokelish(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Yokelish(x) -> not Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Quondam(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Debasing(x) and not Yokelish(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Quondam(x) -> Cusped(x))\nforall x (Cusped(x) -> Quondam(x))\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and not Yokelish(x) -> Quondam(x))\n\nnot Anabiotic(danyette)\n\nCusped(danyette) and forall x (Cusped(x) -> Quondam(x)) -> therefore Quondam(danyette) Quondam(danyette) and forall x (Quondam(x) -> Anabiotic(x)) -> therefore Anabiotic(danyette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The fernande is enzootic. If the fernande is chicken then the fernande is irenic. If something is chicken and extrovert then it is irenic. If something is extrovert then it is not chicken. If something is mesozoic then it is chicken. If something is irenic and not extrovert then it is chicken. Kind things are enzootic. All enzootic things are mesozoic. If something is chicken and not extrovert then it is mesozoic. The fernande is irenic.", "logic": "\nEnzootic(fernande)\nChicken(fernande) -> Irenic(fernande)\nforall x (Chicken(x) and Extrovert(x) -> Irenic(x))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) -> not Chicken(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Chicken(x))\nforall x (Irenic(x) and not Extrovert(x) -> Chicken(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Enzootic(x))\nforall x (Enzootic(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nforall x (Chicken(x) and not Extrovert(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\n\nIrenic(fernande)\n\nEnzootic(fernande) and forall x (Enzootic(x) -> Mesozoic(x)) -> therefore Mesozoic(fernande) Mesozoic(fernande) and forall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Chicken(x)) -> therefore Chicken(fernande) Chicken(fernande) and Chicken(fernande) -> Irenic(fernande) -> therefore Irenic(fernande)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The romeo is newsworthy. If the romeo is genetical then the romeo is violative. If something is genetical and foldaway then it is violative. If something is foldaway then it is not genetical. If something is answering then it is genetical. If something is violative and not foldaway then it is genetical. Kind things are newsworthy. All newsworthy things are answering. If something is genetical and not foldaway then it is answering. The romeo is not violative.", "logic": "\nNewsworthy(romeo)\nGenetical(romeo) -> Violative(romeo)\nforall x (Genetical(x) and Foldaway(x) -> Violative(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> not Genetical(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Genetical(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) and not Foldaway(x) -> Genetical(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Newsworthy(x))\nforall x (Newsworthy(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Genetical(x) and not Foldaway(x) -> Answering(x))\n\nnot Violative(romeo)\n\nNewsworthy(romeo) and forall x (Newsworthy(x) -> Answering(x)) -> therefore Answering(romeo) Answering(romeo) and forall x (Answering(x) -> Genetical(x)) -> therefore Genetical(romeo) Genetical(romeo) and Genetical(romeo) -> Violative(romeo) -> therefore Violative(romeo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The anallese is unorthodox. If the anallese is cleft then the anallese is biblical. If something is cleft and mortal then it is biblical. If something is mortal then it is not cleft. If something is jacobinic then it is cleft. If something is biblical and not mortal then it is cleft. Kind things are unorthodox. All unorthodox things are jacobinic. If something is cleft and not mortal then it is jacobinic. The anallese does not need the anallese.", "logic": "\nUnorthodox(anallese)\nCleft(anallese) -> Biblical(anallese)\nforall x (Cleft(x) and Mortal(x) -> Biblical(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) -> not Cleft(x))\nforall x (Jacobinic(x) -> Cleft(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) and not Mortal(x) -> Cleft(x))\nforall x (Jacobinic(x) -> Unorthodox(x))\nforall x (Unorthodox(x) -> Jacobinic(x))\nforall x (Cleft(x) and not Mortal(x) -> Jacobinic(x))\n\nnot Needs(anallese, anallese)\n\nnot Needs(anallese, anallese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The lotty is meteoric. If the lotty is juridic then the lotty is haired. If something is juridic and nosey then it is haired. If something is nosey then it is not juridic. If something is topical then it is juridic. If something is haired and not nosey then it is juridic. Kind things are meteoric. All meteoric things are topical. If something is juridic and not nosey then it is topical. The lotty sees the lotty.", "logic": "\nMeteoric(lotty)\nJuridic(lotty) -> Haired(lotty)\nforall x (Juridic(x) and Nosey(x) -> Haired(x))\nforall x (Nosey(x) -> not Juridic(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Haired(x) and not Nosey(x) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) -> Meteoric(x))\nforall x (Meteoric(x) -> Topical(x))\nforall x (Juridic(x) and not Nosey(x) -> Topical(x))\n\nSees(lotty, lotty)\n\nSees(lotty, lotty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The armand is urbanized. If the armand is exogamic then the armand is shakable. If something is exogamic and shipboard then it is shakable. If something is shipboard then it is not exogamic. If something is elaborated then it is exogamic. If something is shakable and not shipboard then it is exogamic. Kind things are urbanized. All urbanized things are elaborated. If something is exogamic and not shipboard then it is elaborated. The armand does not visit the armand.", "logic": "\nUrbanized(armand)\nExogamic(armand) -> Shakable(armand)\nforall x (Exogamic(x) and Shipboard(x) -> Shakable(x))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) -> not Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Shakable(x) and not Shipboard(x) -> Exogamic(x))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> Urbanized(x))\nforall x (Urbanized(x) -> Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Exogamic(x) and not Shipboard(x) -> Elaborated(x))\n\nnot Visits(armand, armand)\n\nnot Visits(armand, armand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The dyanne is third. If the dyanne is romani then the dyanne is democratic. If something is romani and corruptive then it is democratic. If something is corruptive then it is not romani. If something is bursal then it is romani. If something is democratic and not corruptive then it is romani. Kind things are third. All third things are bursal. If something is romani and not corruptive then it is bursal. The dyanne is corruptive.", "logic": "\nThird(dyanne)\nRomani(dyanne) -> Democratic(dyanne)\nforall x (Romani(x) and Corruptive(x) -> Democratic(x))\nforall x (Corruptive(x) -> not Romani(x))\nforall x (Bursal(x) -> Romani(x))\nforall x (Democratic(x) and not Corruptive(x) -> Romani(x))\nforall x (Bursal(x) -> Third(x))\nforall x (Third(x) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Romani(x) and not Corruptive(x) -> Bursal(x))\n\nCorruptive(dyanne)\n\nCorruptive(dyanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1157"} {"premises": "The nonnah does not chase the natalee. The nonnah twiddle the natalee. The nonnah is aluminous. The nonnah ramp the jessy. The nonnah ramp the rusty. The natalee yodel the nonnah. The natalee does not eat the nonnah. The jessy is habitable. The jessy does not like the nonnah. The rusty ramp the jessy. If the natalee ramp the jessy then the jessy does not eat the rusty. If something ramp the jessy and it does not eat the jessy then the jessy yodel the natalee. If something ramp the jessy and it does not chase the natalee then the jessy is fooling. The rusty ramp the jessy.", "logic": "\nnot Yodel(nonnah, natalee)\nTwiddle(nonnah, natalee)\nAluminous(nonnah)\nRamp(nonnah, jessy)\nRamp(nonnah, rusty)\nYodel(natalee, nonnah)\nnot Twiddle(natalee, nonnah)\nHabitable(jessy)\nnot Ramp(jessy, nonnah)\nRamp(rusty, jessy)\nRamp(natalee, jessy) -> not Twiddle(jessy, rusty)\nforall x (Ramp(x, jessy) and not Twiddle(x, jessy) -> Yodel(jessy, natalee))\nforall x (Ramp(x, jessy) and not Yodel(x, natalee) -> Fooling(jessy))\n\nRamp(rusty, jessy)\n\ntherefore Ramp(rusty, jessy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3005"} {"premises": "The theda does not chase the rawley. The theda bill the rawley. The theda is vulgar. The theda stutter the edwin. The theda stutter the ronda. The rawley tile the theda. The rawley does not eat the theda. The edwin is beneficed. The edwin does not like the theda. The ronda stutter the edwin. If the rawley stutter the edwin then the edwin does not eat the ronda. If something stutter the edwin and it does not eat the edwin then the edwin tile the rawley. If something stutter the edwin and it does not chase the rawley then the edwin is jejune. The edwin stutter the theda.", "logic": "\nnot Tile(theda, rawley)\nBill(theda, rawley)\nVulgar(theda)\nStutter(theda, edwin)\nStutter(theda, ronda)\nTile(rawley, theda)\nnot Bill(rawley, theda)\nBeneficed(edwin)\nnot Stutter(edwin, theda)\nStutter(ronda, edwin)\nStutter(rawley, edwin) -> not Bill(edwin, ronda)\nforall x (Stutter(x, edwin) and not Bill(x, edwin) -> Tile(edwin, rawley))\nforall x (Stutter(x, edwin) and not Tile(x, rawley) -> Jejune(edwin))\n\nStutter(edwin, theda)\n\ntherefore not Stutter(edwin, theda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3005"} {"premises": "The penni does not chase the raina. The penni ammoniate the raina. The penni is myelinic. The penni instal the torrie. The penni instal the abigail. The raina metricate the penni. The raina does not eat the penni. The torrie is yokelish. The torrie does not like the penni. The abigail instal the torrie. If the raina instal the torrie then the torrie does not eat the abigail. If something instal the torrie and it does not eat the torrie then the torrie metricate the raina. If something instal the torrie and it does not chase the raina then the torrie is galled. The torrie does not chase the raina.", "logic": "\nnot Metricate(penni, raina)\nAmmoniate(penni, raina)\nMyelinic(penni)\nInstal(penni, torrie)\nInstal(penni, abigail)\nMetricate(raina, penni)\nnot Ammoniate(raina, penni)\nYokelish(torrie)\nnot Instal(torrie, penni)\nInstal(abigail, torrie)\nInstal(raina, torrie) -> not Ammoniate(torrie, abigail)\nforall x (Instal(x, torrie) and not Ammoniate(x, torrie) -> Metricate(torrie, raina))\nforall x (Instal(x, torrie) and not Metricate(x, raina) -> Galled(torrie))\n\nnot Metricate(torrie, raina)\n\nforall x (Instal(x, torrie) and not Ammoniate(x, torrie) -> Metricate(torrie, raina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3005"} {"premises": "The prudy does not chase the vanny. The prudy tessellate the vanny. The prudy is tomentous. The prudy cheque the danyelle. The prudy cheque the ardine. The vanny smatter the prudy. The vanny does not eat the prudy. The danyelle is clever. The danyelle does not like the prudy. The ardine cheque the danyelle. If the vanny cheque the danyelle then the danyelle does not eat the ardine. If something cheque the danyelle and it does not eat the danyelle then the danyelle smatter the vanny. If something cheque the danyelle and it does not chase the vanny then the danyelle is rateable. The danyelle tessellate the ardine.", "logic": "\nnot Smatter(prudy, vanny)\nTessellate(prudy, vanny)\nTomentous(prudy)\nCheque(prudy, danyelle)\nCheque(prudy, ardine)\nSmatter(vanny, prudy)\nnot Tessellate(vanny, prudy)\nClever(danyelle)\nnot Cheque(danyelle, prudy)\nCheque(ardine, danyelle)\nCheque(vanny, danyelle) -> not Tessellate(danyelle, ardine)\nforall x (Cheque(x, danyelle) and not Tessellate(x, danyelle) -> Smatter(danyelle, vanny))\nforall x (Cheque(x, danyelle) and not Smatter(x, vanny) -> Rateable(danyelle))\n\nTessellate(danyelle, ardine)\n\nTessellate(danyelle, ardine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3005"} {"premises": "The octavius inclose the shayne. The karlotte inclose the octavius. The shayne cowl the karlotte. If someone cowl the karlotte then they are araneidal. The shayne cowl the karlotte.", "logic": "\nInclose(octavius, shayne)\nInclose(karlotte, octavius)\nCowl(shayne, karlotte)\nforall x (Cowl(x, karlotte) -> Araneidal(x))\n\nCowl(shayne, karlotte)\n\ntherefore Cowl(shayne, karlotte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The art cantillate the marylee. The martina cantillate the art. The marylee outfit the martina. If someone outfit the martina then they are slow. The marylee does not eat the martina.", "logic": "\nCantillate(art, marylee)\nCantillate(martina, art)\nOutfit(marylee, martina)\nforall x (Outfit(x, martina) -> Slow(x))\n\nnot Outfit(marylee, martina)\n\ntherefore Outfit(marylee, martina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The troy nettle the tallie. The auguste nettle the troy. The tallie dizen the auguste. If someone dizen the auguste then they are fortunate. The tallie is fortunate.", "logic": "\nNettle(troy, tallie)\nNettle(auguste, troy)\nDizen(tallie, auguste)\nforall x (Dizen(x, auguste) -> Fortunate(x))\n\nFortunate(tallie)\n\nDizen(tallie, auguste) and forall x (Dizen(x, auguste) -> Fortunate(x)) -> therefore Fortunate(tallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The ephrem clink the dolores. The tito clink the ephrem. The dolores moult the tito. If someone moult the tito then they are uninsured. The dolores is not uninsured.", "logic": "\nClink(ephrem, dolores)\nClink(tito, ephrem)\nMoult(dolores, tito)\nforall x (Moult(x, tito) -> Uninsured(x))\n\nnot Uninsured(dolores)\n\nMoult(dolores, tito) and forall x (Moult(x, tito) -> Uninsured(x)) -> therefore Uninsured(dolores)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The benedict outrival the malinde. The ezra outrival the benedict. The malinde approach the ezra. If someone approach the ezra then they are cursory. The benedict is not cursory.", "logic": "\nOutrival(benedict, malinde)\nOutrival(ezra, benedict)\nApproach(malinde, ezra)\nforall x (Approach(x, ezra) -> Cursory(x))\n\nnot Cursory(benedict)\n\nforall x (Approach(x, ezra) -> Cursory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The carlynne becalm the barrie. The zonnya becalm the carlynne. The barrie profess the zonnya. If someone profess the zonnya then they are previous. The zonnya is previous.", "logic": "\nBecalm(carlynne, barrie)\nBecalm(zonnya, carlynne)\nProfess(barrie, zonnya)\nforall x (Profess(x, zonnya) -> Previous(x))\n\nPrevious(zonnya)\n\nforall x (Profess(x, zonnya) -> Previous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The leodora betroth the arleyne. The hector betroth the leodora. The arleyne biff the hector. If someone biff the hector then they are amuck. The leodora is not green.", "logic": "\nBetroth(leodora, arleyne)\nBetroth(hector, leodora)\nBiff(arleyne, hector)\nforall x (Biff(x, hector) -> Amuck(x))\n\nnot Green(leodora)\n\nnot Green(leodora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The xenos broom the lisabeth. The sholom broom the xenos. The lisabeth antedate the sholom. If someone antedate the sholom then they are unhurt. The xenos antedate the xenos.", "logic": "\nBroom(xenos, lisabeth)\nBroom(sholom, xenos)\nAntedate(lisabeth, sholom)\nforall x (Antedate(x, sholom) -> Unhurt(x))\n\nAntedate(xenos, xenos)\n\nAntedate(xenos, xenos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1267"} {"premises": "The fifi is not watchful. The clarisse is watchful. The clarisse weed the luciana. The clarisse silhouette the fifi. The engelbart is not watchful. The engelbart is votive. The engelbart cooccur the clarisse. The engelbart silhouette the clarisse. The luciana is transonic. The luciana cooccur the clarisse. If someone silhouette the luciana and the luciana is not arboreal then they like the fifi. If the luciana silhouette the fifi and the luciana is transonic then the fifi is votive. If someone is votive then they do not like the luciana. If the luciana is transonic then the luciana silhouette the fifi. If someone weed the luciana then they do not see the fifi. If someone cooccur the luciana then the luciana cooccur the fifi. The engelbart is not watchful.", "logic": "\nnot Watchful(fifi)\nWatchful(clarisse)\nWeed(clarisse, luciana)\nSilhouette(clarisse, fifi)\nnot Watchful(engelbart)\nVotive(engelbart)\nCooccur(engelbart, clarisse)\nSilhouette(engelbart, clarisse)\nTransonic(luciana)\nCooccur(luciana, clarisse)\nforall x (Silhouette(x, luciana) and not Arboreal(luciana) -> Weed(x, fifi))\nSilhouette(luciana, fifi) and Transonic(luciana) -> Votive(fifi)\nforall x (Votive(x) -> not Weed(x, luciana))\nTransonic(luciana) -> Silhouette(luciana, fifi)\nforall x (Weed(x, luciana) -> not Cooccur(x, fifi))\nforall x (Cooccur(x, luciana) -> Cooccur(luciana, fifi))\n\nnot Watchful(engelbart)\n\ntherefore not Watchful(engelbart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The charmine is not paraguayan. The emmett is paraguayan. The emmett rook the rafaela. The emmett bedew the charmine. The sheelagh is not paraguayan. The sheelagh is hertzian. The sheelagh bowl the emmett. The sheelagh bedew the emmett. The rafaela is balky. The rafaela bowl the emmett. If someone bedew the rafaela and the rafaela is not pietistic then they like the charmine. If the rafaela bedew the charmine and the rafaela is balky then the charmine is hertzian. If someone is hertzian then they do not like the rafaela. If the rafaela is balky then the rafaela bedew the charmine. If someone rook the rafaela then they do not see the charmine. If someone bowl the rafaela then the rafaela bowl the charmine. The sheelagh does not visit the emmett.", "logic": "\nnot Paraguayan(charmine)\nParaguayan(emmett)\nRook(emmett, rafaela)\nBedew(emmett, charmine)\nnot Paraguayan(sheelagh)\nHertzian(sheelagh)\nBowl(sheelagh, emmett)\nBedew(sheelagh, emmett)\nBalky(rafaela)\nBowl(rafaela, emmett)\nforall x (Bedew(x, rafaela) and not Pietistic(rafaela) -> Rook(x, charmine))\nBedew(rafaela, charmine) and Balky(rafaela) -> Hertzian(charmine)\nforall x (Hertzian(x) -> not Rook(x, rafaela))\nBalky(rafaela) -> Bedew(rafaela, charmine)\nforall x (Rook(x, rafaela) -> not Bowl(x, charmine))\nforall x (Bowl(x, rafaela) -> Bowl(rafaela, charmine))\n\nnot Bedew(sheelagh, emmett)\n\ntherefore Bedew(sheelagh, emmett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The torrey is not postural. The vivyanne is postural. The vivyanne unplug the fairfax. The vivyanne grave the torrey. The hollis is not postural. The hollis is primaeval. The hollis blear the vivyanne. The hollis grave the vivyanne. The fairfax is sclerotic. The fairfax blear the vivyanne. If someone grave the fairfax and the fairfax is not suffusive then they like the torrey. If the fairfax grave the torrey and the fairfax is sclerotic then the torrey is primaeval. If someone is primaeval then they do not like the fairfax. If the fairfax is sclerotic then the fairfax grave the torrey. If someone unplug the fairfax then they do not see the torrey. If someone blear the fairfax then the fairfax blear the torrey. The vivyanne does not see the torrey.", "logic": "\nnot Postural(torrey)\nPostural(vivyanne)\nUnplug(vivyanne, fairfax)\nGrave(vivyanne, torrey)\nnot Postural(hollis)\nPrimaeval(hollis)\nBlear(hollis, vivyanne)\nGrave(hollis, vivyanne)\nSclerotic(fairfax)\nBlear(fairfax, vivyanne)\nforall x (Grave(x, fairfax) and not Suffusive(fairfax) -> Unplug(x, torrey))\nGrave(fairfax, torrey) and Sclerotic(fairfax) -> Primaeval(torrey)\nforall x (Primaeval(x) -> not Unplug(x, fairfax))\nSclerotic(fairfax) -> Grave(fairfax, torrey)\nforall x (Unplug(x, fairfax) -> not Blear(x, torrey))\nforall x (Blear(x, fairfax) -> Blear(fairfax, torrey))\n\nnot Blear(vivyanne, torrey)\n\nUnplug(vivyanne, fairfax) and forall x (Unplug(x, fairfax) -> not Blear(x, torrey)) -> therefore not Blear(vivyanne, torrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The max is not isosceles. The celestine is isosceles. The celestine persuade the izzy. The celestine channel the max. The shurlock is not isosceles. The shurlock is missionary. The shurlock peach the celestine. The shurlock channel the celestine. The izzy is untanned. The izzy peach the celestine. If someone channel the izzy and the izzy is not scraggy then they like the max. If the izzy channel the max and the izzy is untanned then the max is missionary. If someone is missionary then they do not like the izzy. If the izzy is untanned then the izzy channel the max. If someone persuade the izzy then they do not see the max. If someone peach the izzy then the izzy peach the max. The izzy does not visit the max.", "logic": "\nnot Isosceles(max)\nIsosceles(celestine)\nPersuade(celestine, izzy)\nChannel(celestine, max)\nnot Isosceles(shurlock)\nMissionary(shurlock)\nPeach(shurlock, celestine)\nChannel(shurlock, celestine)\nUntanned(izzy)\nPeach(izzy, celestine)\nforall x (Channel(x, izzy) and not Scraggy(izzy) -> Persuade(x, max))\nChannel(izzy, max) and Untanned(izzy) -> Missionary(max)\nforall x (Missionary(x) -> not Persuade(x, izzy))\nUntanned(izzy) -> Channel(izzy, max)\nforall x (Persuade(x, izzy) -> not Peach(x, max))\nforall x (Peach(x, izzy) -> Peach(izzy, max))\n\nnot Channel(izzy, max)\n\nUntanned(izzy) and Untanned(izzy) -> Channel(izzy, max) -> therefore Channel(izzy, max)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The pollyanna is not hominian. The toddie is hominian. The toddie crispen the ingeborg. The toddie quell the pollyanna. The benoite is not hominian. The benoite is zigzag. The benoite catcall the toddie. The benoite quell the toddie. The ingeborg is bedridden. The ingeborg catcall the toddie. If someone quell the ingeborg and the ingeborg is not tinseled then they like the pollyanna. If the ingeborg quell the pollyanna and the ingeborg is bedridden then the pollyanna is zigzag. If someone is zigzag then they do not like the ingeborg. If the ingeborg is bedridden then the ingeborg quell the pollyanna. If someone crispen the ingeborg then they do not see the pollyanna. If someone catcall the ingeborg then the ingeborg catcall the pollyanna. The pollyanna is zigzag.", "logic": "\nnot Hominian(pollyanna)\nHominian(toddie)\nCrispen(toddie, ingeborg)\nQuell(toddie, pollyanna)\nnot Hominian(benoite)\nZigzag(benoite)\nCatcall(benoite, toddie)\nQuell(benoite, toddie)\nBedridden(ingeborg)\nCatcall(ingeborg, toddie)\nforall x (Quell(x, ingeborg) and not Tinseled(ingeborg) -> Crispen(x, pollyanna))\nQuell(ingeborg, pollyanna) and Bedridden(ingeborg) -> Zigzag(pollyanna)\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> not Crispen(x, ingeborg))\nBedridden(ingeborg) -> Quell(ingeborg, pollyanna)\nforall x (Crispen(x, ingeborg) -> not Catcall(x, pollyanna))\nforall x (Catcall(x, ingeborg) -> Catcall(ingeborg, pollyanna))\n\nZigzag(pollyanna)\n\nBedridden(ingeborg) and Bedridden(ingeborg) -> Quell(ingeborg, pollyanna) -> therefore Quell(ingeborg, pollyanna) Quell(ingeborg, pollyanna) and Bedridden(ingeborg) and Quell(ingeborg, pollyanna) and Bedridden(ingeborg) -> Zigzag(pollyanna) -> therefore Zigzag(pollyanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The bernard is not matronly. The norton is matronly. The norton oppugn the kameko. The norton whang the bernard. The hank is not matronly. The hank is christlike. The hank chisel the norton. The hank whang the norton. The kameko is wanting. The kameko chisel the norton. If someone whang the kameko and the kameko is not equatorial then they like the bernard. If the kameko whang the bernard and the kameko is wanting then the bernard is christlike. If someone is christlike then they do not like the kameko. If the kameko is wanting then the kameko whang the bernard. If someone oppugn the kameko then they do not see the bernard. If someone chisel the kameko then the kameko chisel the bernard. The bernard is not christlike.", "logic": "\nnot Matronly(bernard)\nMatronly(norton)\nOppugn(norton, kameko)\nWhang(norton, bernard)\nnot Matronly(hank)\nChristlike(hank)\nChisel(hank, norton)\nWhang(hank, norton)\nWanting(kameko)\nChisel(kameko, norton)\nforall x (Whang(x, kameko) and not Equatorial(kameko) -> Oppugn(x, bernard))\nWhang(kameko, bernard) and Wanting(kameko) -> Christlike(bernard)\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> not Oppugn(x, kameko))\nWanting(kameko) -> Whang(kameko, bernard)\nforall x (Oppugn(x, kameko) -> not Chisel(x, bernard))\nforall x (Chisel(x, kameko) -> Chisel(kameko, bernard))\n\nnot Christlike(bernard)\n\nWanting(kameko) and Wanting(kameko) -> Whang(kameko, bernard) -> therefore Whang(kameko, bernard) Whang(kameko, bernard) and Wanting(kameko) and Whang(kameko, bernard) and Wanting(kameko) -> Christlike(bernard) -> therefore Christlike(bernard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The carola is not improper. The maisie is improper. The maisie undercut the golda. The maisie brim the carola. The win is not improper. The win is baseless. The win supersede the maisie. The win brim the maisie. The golda is catabolic. The golda supersede the maisie. If someone brim the golda and the golda is not vibrant then they like the carola. If the golda brim the carola and the golda is catabolic then the carola is baseless. If someone is baseless then they do not like the golda. If the golda is catabolic then the golda brim the carola. If someone undercut the golda then they do not see the carola. If someone supersede the golda then the golda supersede the carola. The carola does not like the golda.", "logic": "\nnot Improper(carola)\nImproper(maisie)\nUndercut(maisie, golda)\nBrim(maisie, carola)\nnot Improper(win)\nBaseless(win)\nSupersede(win, maisie)\nBrim(win, maisie)\nCatabolic(golda)\nSupersede(golda, maisie)\nforall x (Brim(x, golda) and not Vibrant(golda) -> Undercut(x, carola))\nBrim(golda, carola) and Catabolic(golda) -> Baseless(carola)\nforall x (Baseless(x) -> not Undercut(x, golda))\nCatabolic(golda) -> Brim(golda, carola)\nforall x (Undercut(x, golda) -> not Supersede(x, carola))\nforall x (Supersede(x, golda) -> Supersede(golda, carola))\n\nnot Undercut(carola, golda)\n\nCatabolic(golda) and Catabolic(golda) -> Brim(golda, carola) -> therefore Brim(golda, carola) Brim(golda, carola) and Catabolic(golda) and Brim(golda, carola) and Catabolic(golda) -> Baseless(carola) -> therefore Baseless(carola) Baseless(carola) and forall x (Baseless(x) -> not Undercut(x, golda)) -> therefore not Undercut(carola, golda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The minni is not isothermal. The phip is isothermal. The phip relapse the arthur. The phip fleece the minni. The genovera is not isothermal. The genovera is jeweled. The genovera verbalize the phip. The genovera fleece the phip. The arthur is plumaged. The arthur verbalize the phip. If someone fleece the arthur and the arthur is not colonic then they like the minni. If the arthur fleece the minni and the arthur is plumaged then the minni is jeweled. If someone is jeweled then they do not like the arthur. If the arthur is plumaged then the arthur fleece the minni. If someone relapse the arthur then they do not see the minni. If someone verbalize the arthur then the arthur verbalize the minni. The minni relapse the arthur.", "logic": "\nnot Isothermal(minni)\nIsothermal(phip)\nRelapse(phip, arthur)\nFleece(phip, minni)\nnot Isothermal(genovera)\nJeweled(genovera)\nVerbalize(genovera, phip)\nFleece(genovera, phip)\nPlumaged(arthur)\nVerbalize(arthur, phip)\nforall x (Fleece(x, arthur) and not Colonic(arthur) -> Relapse(x, minni))\nFleece(arthur, minni) and Plumaged(arthur) -> Jeweled(minni)\nforall x (Jeweled(x) -> not Relapse(x, arthur))\nPlumaged(arthur) -> Fleece(arthur, minni)\nforall x (Relapse(x, arthur) -> not Verbalize(x, minni))\nforall x (Verbalize(x, arthur) -> Verbalize(arthur, minni))\n\nRelapse(minni, arthur)\n\nPlumaged(arthur) and Plumaged(arthur) -> Fleece(arthur, minni) -> therefore Fleece(arthur, minni) Fleece(arthur, minni) and Plumaged(arthur) and Fleece(arthur, minni) and Plumaged(arthur) -> Jeweled(minni) -> therefore Jeweled(minni) Jeweled(minni) and forall x (Jeweled(x) -> not Relapse(x, arthur)) -> therefore not Relapse(minni, arthur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The waleed is not blameful. The gavra is blameful. The gavra slave the charmane. The gavra instigate the waleed. The louisa is not blameful. The louisa is duodecimal. The louisa show the gavra. The louisa instigate the gavra. The charmane is wimpy. The charmane show the gavra. If someone instigate the charmane and the charmane is not unsleeping then they like the waleed. If the charmane instigate the waleed and the charmane is wimpy then the waleed is duodecimal. If someone is duodecimal then they do not like the charmane. If the charmane is wimpy then the charmane instigate the waleed. If someone slave the charmane then they do not see the waleed. If someone show the charmane then the charmane show the waleed. The gavra does not like the waleed.", "logic": "\nnot Blameful(waleed)\nBlameful(gavra)\nSlave(gavra, charmane)\nInstigate(gavra, waleed)\nnot Blameful(louisa)\nDuodecimal(louisa)\nShow(louisa, gavra)\nInstigate(louisa, gavra)\nWimpy(charmane)\nShow(charmane, gavra)\nforall x (Instigate(x, charmane) and not Unsleeping(charmane) -> Slave(x, waleed))\nInstigate(charmane, waleed) and Wimpy(charmane) -> Duodecimal(waleed)\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) -> not Slave(x, charmane))\nWimpy(charmane) -> Instigate(charmane, waleed)\nforall x (Slave(x, charmane) -> not Show(x, waleed))\nforall x (Show(x, charmane) -> Show(charmane, waleed))\n\nnot Slave(gavra, waleed)\n\nforall x (Instigate(x, charmane) and not Unsleeping(charmane) -> Slave(x, waleed)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The chantal is not rhomboidal. The moya is rhomboidal. The moya draft the korrie. The moya reprint the chantal. The bentley is not rhomboidal. The bentley is palatal. The bentley staple the moya. The bentley reprint the moya. The korrie is decided. The korrie staple the moya. If someone reprint the korrie and the korrie is not mycenaean then they like the chantal. If the korrie reprint the chantal and the korrie is decided then the chantal is palatal. If someone is palatal then they do not like the korrie. If the korrie is decided then the korrie reprint the chantal. If someone draft the korrie then they do not see the chantal. If someone staple the korrie then the korrie staple the chantal. The chantal draft the chantal.", "logic": "\nnot Rhomboidal(chantal)\nRhomboidal(moya)\nDraft(moya, korrie)\nReprint(moya, chantal)\nnot Rhomboidal(bentley)\nPalatal(bentley)\nStaple(bentley, moya)\nReprint(bentley, moya)\nDecided(korrie)\nStaple(korrie, moya)\nforall x (Reprint(x, korrie) and not Mycenaean(korrie) -> Draft(x, chantal))\nReprint(korrie, chantal) and Decided(korrie) -> Palatal(chantal)\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> not Draft(x, korrie))\nDecided(korrie) -> Reprint(korrie, chantal)\nforall x (Draft(x, korrie) -> not Staple(x, chantal))\nforall x (Staple(x, korrie) -> Staple(korrie, chantal))\n\nDraft(chantal, chantal)\n\nforall x (Reprint(x, korrie) and not Mycenaean(korrie) -> Draft(x, chantal)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The roosevelt is not potholed. The marne is potholed. The marne monkey the betsey. The marne bankrupt the roosevelt. The cassie is not potholed. The cassie is synoptical. The cassie scant the marne. The cassie bankrupt the marne. The betsey is bluff. The betsey scant the marne. If someone bankrupt the betsey and the betsey is not faithful then they like the roosevelt. If the betsey bankrupt the roosevelt and the betsey is bluff then the roosevelt is synoptical. If someone is synoptical then they do not like the betsey. If the betsey is bluff then the betsey bankrupt the roosevelt. If someone monkey the betsey then they do not see the roosevelt. If someone scant the betsey then the betsey scant the roosevelt. The betsey does not like the roosevelt.", "logic": "\nnot Potholed(roosevelt)\nPotholed(marne)\nMonkey(marne, betsey)\nBankrupt(marne, roosevelt)\nnot Potholed(cassie)\nSynoptical(cassie)\nScant(cassie, marne)\nBankrupt(cassie, marne)\nBluff(betsey)\nScant(betsey, marne)\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, betsey) and not Faithful(betsey) -> Monkey(x, roosevelt))\nBankrupt(betsey, roosevelt) and Bluff(betsey) -> Synoptical(roosevelt)\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> not Monkey(x, betsey))\nBluff(betsey) -> Bankrupt(betsey, roosevelt)\nforall x (Monkey(x, betsey) -> not Scant(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Scant(x, betsey) -> Scant(betsey, roosevelt))\n\nnot Monkey(betsey, roosevelt)\n\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, betsey) and not Faithful(betsey) -> Monkey(x, roosevelt)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The norton is not imprudent. The eadie is imprudent. The eadie joggle the mervin. The eadie politicise the norton. The joslyn is not imprudent. The joslyn is frugal. The joslyn hunt the eadie. The joslyn politicise the eadie. The mervin is flushed. The mervin hunt the eadie. If someone politicise the mervin and the mervin is not andean then they like the norton. If the mervin politicise the norton and the mervin is flushed then the norton is frugal. If someone is frugal then they do not like the mervin. If the mervin is flushed then the mervin politicise the norton. If someone joggle the mervin then they do not see the norton. If someone hunt the mervin then the mervin hunt the norton. The mervin hunt the norton.", "logic": "\nnot Imprudent(norton)\nImprudent(eadie)\nJoggle(eadie, mervin)\nPoliticise(eadie, norton)\nnot Imprudent(joslyn)\nFrugal(joslyn)\nHunt(joslyn, eadie)\nPoliticise(joslyn, eadie)\nFlushed(mervin)\nHunt(mervin, eadie)\nforall x (Politicise(x, mervin) and not Andean(mervin) -> Joggle(x, norton))\nPoliticise(mervin, norton) and Flushed(mervin) -> Frugal(norton)\nforall x (Frugal(x) -> not Joggle(x, mervin))\nFlushed(mervin) -> Politicise(mervin, norton)\nforall x (Joggle(x, mervin) -> not Hunt(x, norton))\nforall x (Hunt(x, mervin) -> Hunt(mervin, norton))\n\nHunt(mervin, norton)\n\nforall x (Hunt(x, mervin) -> Hunt(mervin, norton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The ludwig is not regressive. The iago is regressive. The iago clamour the casandra. The iago spiel the ludwig. The mae is not regressive. The mae is nonlethal. The mae chute the iago. The mae spiel the iago. The casandra is respective. The casandra chute the iago. If someone spiel the casandra and the casandra is not specious then they like the ludwig. If the casandra spiel the ludwig and the casandra is respective then the ludwig is nonlethal. If someone is nonlethal then they do not like the casandra. If the casandra is respective then the casandra spiel the ludwig. If someone clamour the casandra then they do not see the ludwig. If someone chute the casandra then the casandra chute the ludwig. The iago does not like the mae.", "logic": "\nnot Regressive(ludwig)\nRegressive(iago)\nClamour(iago, casandra)\nSpiel(iago, ludwig)\nnot Regressive(mae)\nNonlethal(mae)\nChute(mae, iago)\nSpiel(mae, iago)\nRespective(casandra)\nChute(casandra, iago)\nforall x (Spiel(x, casandra) and not Specious(casandra) -> Clamour(x, ludwig))\nSpiel(casandra, ludwig) and Respective(casandra) -> Nonlethal(ludwig)\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) -> not Clamour(x, casandra))\nRespective(casandra) -> Spiel(casandra, ludwig)\nforall x (Clamour(x, casandra) -> not Chute(x, ludwig))\nforall x (Chute(x, casandra) -> Chute(casandra, ludwig))\n\nnot Clamour(iago, mae)\n\nnot Clamour(iago, mae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The leiah is not myelic. The natalina is myelic. The natalina trisect the caro. The natalina admix the leiah. The lynna is not myelic. The lynna is utility. The lynna cradle the natalina. The lynna admix the natalina. The caro is monoicous. The caro cradle the natalina. If someone admix the caro and the caro is not vulval then they like the leiah. If the caro admix the leiah and the caro is monoicous then the leiah is utility. If someone is utility then they do not like the caro. If the caro is monoicous then the caro admix the leiah. If someone trisect the caro then they do not see the leiah. If someone cradle the caro then the caro cradle the leiah. The caro cradle the lynna.", "logic": "\nnot Myelic(leiah)\nMyelic(natalina)\nTrisect(natalina, caro)\nAdmix(natalina, leiah)\nnot Myelic(lynna)\nUtility(lynna)\nCradle(lynna, natalina)\nAdmix(lynna, natalina)\nMonoicous(caro)\nCradle(caro, natalina)\nforall x (Admix(x, caro) and not Vulval(caro) -> Trisect(x, leiah))\nAdmix(caro, leiah) and Monoicous(caro) -> Utility(leiah)\nforall x (Utility(x) -> not Trisect(x, caro))\nMonoicous(caro) -> Admix(caro, leiah)\nforall x (Trisect(x, caro) -> not Cradle(x, leiah))\nforall x (Cradle(x, caro) -> Cradle(caro, leiah))\n\nCradle(caro, lynna)\n\nCradle(caro, lynna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The lynde is not workaday. The maryrose is workaday. The maryrose merit the luisa. The maryrose mortify the lynde. The sula is not workaday. The sula is antiseptic. The sula blossom the maryrose. The sula mortify the maryrose. The luisa is invading. The luisa blossom the maryrose. If someone mortify the luisa and the luisa is not uxorious then they like the lynde. If the luisa mortify the lynde and the luisa is invading then the lynde is antiseptic. If someone is antiseptic then they do not like the luisa. If the luisa is invading then the luisa mortify the lynde. If someone merit the luisa then they do not see the lynde. If someone blossom the luisa then the luisa blossom the lynde. The maryrose does not like the maryrose.", "logic": "\nnot Workaday(lynde)\nWorkaday(maryrose)\nMerit(maryrose, luisa)\nMortify(maryrose, lynde)\nnot Workaday(sula)\nAntiseptic(sula)\nBlossom(sula, maryrose)\nMortify(sula, maryrose)\nInvading(luisa)\nBlossom(luisa, maryrose)\nforall x (Mortify(x, luisa) and not Uxorious(luisa) -> Merit(x, lynde))\nMortify(luisa, lynde) and Invading(luisa) -> Antiseptic(lynde)\nforall x (Antiseptic(x) -> not Merit(x, luisa))\nInvading(luisa) -> Mortify(luisa, lynde)\nforall x (Merit(x, luisa) -> not Blossom(x, lynde))\nforall x (Blossom(x, luisa) -> Blossom(luisa, lynde))\n\nnot Merit(maryrose, maryrose)\n\nnot Merit(maryrose, maryrose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The bennie is not anesthetic. The megan is anesthetic. The megan vitrify the harvie. The megan grumble the bennie. The maritsa is not anesthetic. The maritsa is esurient. The maritsa transpose the megan. The maritsa grumble the megan. The harvie is parve. The harvie transpose the megan. If someone grumble the harvie and the harvie is not baccate then they like the bennie. If the harvie grumble the bennie and the harvie is parve then the bennie is esurient. If someone is esurient then they do not like the harvie. If the harvie is parve then the harvie grumble the bennie. If someone vitrify the harvie then they do not see the bennie. If someone transpose the harvie then the harvie transpose the bennie. The megan grumble the maritsa.", "logic": "\nnot Anesthetic(bennie)\nAnesthetic(megan)\nVitrify(megan, harvie)\nGrumble(megan, bennie)\nnot Anesthetic(maritsa)\nEsurient(maritsa)\nTranspose(maritsa, megan)\nGrumble(maritsa, megan)\nParve(harvie)\nTranspose(harvie, megan)\nforall x (Grumble(x, harvie) and not Baccate(harvie) -> Vitrify(x, bennie))\nGrumble(harvie, bennie) and Parve(harvie) -> Esurient(bennie)\nforall x (Esurient(x) -> not Vitrify(x, harvie))\nParve(harvie) -> Grumble(harvie, bennie)\nforall x (Vitrify(x, harvie) -> not Transpose(x, bennie))\nforall x (Transpose(x, harvie) -> Transpose(harvie, bennie))\n\nGrumble(megan, maritsa)\n\nGrumble(megan, maritsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-594"} {"premises": "The jeffery is methodical. The jeffery is hastate. The jeffery liven the jermaine. The jeffery liven the roze. The jermaine rubricate the roze. The jermaine is methodical. The jermaine is hastate. The roze rubricate the jermaine. The roze rubricate the lorrie. The lorrie rubricate the jermaine. The lorrie resurge the jeffery. The lorrie resurge the roze. If the lorrie is hastate and the lorrie resurge the roze then the roze resurge the lorrie. If someone liven the roze and the roze is osmotic then the roze is over. If the roze resurge the lorrie and the roze resurge the jermaine then the roze rubricate the jermaine. If the lorrie resurge the roze and the lorrie is over then the lorrie is hastate. If the lorrie is leftish and the lorrie rubricate the jeffery then the lorrie rubricate the jermaine. If someone rubricate the lorrie then they see the jermaine. If someone rubricate the jeffery then they like the jermaine. If someone resurge the jeffery then they are over. The jeffery liven the jermaine.", "logic": "\nMethodical(jeffery)\nHastate(jeffery)\nLiven(jeffery, jermaine)\nLiven(jeffery, roze)\nRubricate(jermaine, roze)\nMethodical(jermaine)\nHastate(jermaine)\nRubricate(roze, jermaine)\nRubricate(roze, lorrie)\nRubricate(lorrie, jermaine)\nResurge(lorrie, jeffery)\nResurge(lorrie, roze)\nHastate(lorrie) and Resurge(lorrie, roze) -> Resurge(roze, lorrie)\nforall x (Liven(x, roze) and Osmotic(roze) -> Over(roze))\nResurge(roze, lorrie) and Resurge(roze, jermaine) -> Rubricate(roze, jermaine)\nResurge(lorrie, roze) and Over(lorrie) -> Hastate(lorrie)\nLeftish(lorrie) and Rubricate(lorrie, jeffery) -> Rubricate(lorrie, jermaine)\nforall x (Rubricate(x, lorrie) -> Liven(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Rubricate(x, jeffery) -> Resurge(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Resurge(x, jeffery) -> Over(x))\n\nLiven(jeffery, jermaine)\n\ntherefore Liven(jeffery, jermaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The raynor is thespian. The raynor is somnific. The raynor patronise the zack. The raynor patronise the yolanda. The zack undercoat the yolanda. The zack is thespian. The zack is somnific. The yolanda undercoat the zack. The yolanda undercoat the kourtney. The kourtney undercoat the zack. The kourtney redeploy the raynor. The kourtney redeploy the yolanda. If the kourtney is somnific and the kourtney redeploy the yolanda then the yolanda redeploy the kourtney. If someone patronise the yolanda and the yolanda is rotund then the yolanda is dyspneic. If the yolanda redeploy the kourtney and the yolanda redeploy the zack then the yolanda undercoat the zack. If the kourtney redeploy the yolanda and the kourtney is dyspneic then the kourtney is somnific. If the kourtney is gingerly and the kourtney undercoat the raynor then the kourtney undercoat the zack. If someone undercoat the kourtney then they see the zack. If someone undercoat the raynor then they like the zack. If someone redeploy the raynor then they are dyspneic. The raynor does not see the yolanda.", "logic": "\nThespian(raynor)\nSomnific(raynor)\nPatronise(raynor, zack)\nPatronise(raynor, yolanda)\nUndercoat(zack, yolanda)\nThespian(zack)\nSomnific(zack)\nUndercoat(yolanda, zack)\nUndercoat(yolanda, kourtney)\nUndercoat(kourtney, zack)\nRedeploy(kourtney, raynor)\nRedeploy(kourtney, yolanda)\nSomnific(kourtney) and Redeploy(kourtney, yolanda) -> Redeploy(yolanda, kourtney)\nforall x (Patronise(x, yolanda) and Rotund(yolanda) -> Dyspneic(yolanda))\nRedeploy(yolanda, kourtney) and Redeploy(yolanda, zack) -> Undercoat(yolanda, zack)\nRedeploy(kourtney, yolanda) and Dyspneic(kourtney) -> Somnific(kourtney)\nGingerly(kourtney) and Undercoat(kourtney, raynor) -> Undercoat(kourtney, zack)\nforall x (Undercoat(x, kourtney) -> Patronise(x, zack))\nforall x (Undercoat(x, raynor) -> Redeploy(x, zack))\nforall x (Redeploy(x, raynor) -> Dyspneic(x))\n\nnot Patronise(raynor, yolanda)\n\ntherefore Patronise(raynor, yolanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The naoma is union. The naoma is hypothetic. The naoma cane the wildon. The naoma cane the leticia. The wildon uncork the leticia. The wildon is union. The wildon is hypothetic. The leticia uncork the wildon. The leticia uncork the birgitta. The birgitta uncork the wildon. The birgitta profane the naoma. The birgitta profane the leticia. If the birgitta is hypothetic and the birgitta profane the leticia then the leticia profane the birgitta. If someone cane the leticia and the leticia is synoptical then the leticia is tailed. If the leticia profane the birgitta and the leticia profane the wildon then the leticia uncork the wildon. If the birgitta profane the leticia and the birgitta is tailed then the birgitta is hypothetic. If the birgitta is faithful and the birgitta uncork the naoma then the birgitta uncork the wildon. If someone uncork the birgitta then they see the wildon. If someone uncork the naoma then they like the wildon. If someone profane the naoma then they are tailed. The leticia cane the wildon.", "logic": "\nUnion(naoma)\nHypothetic(naoma)\nCane(naoma, wildon)\nCane(naoma, leticia)\nUncork(wildon, leticia)\nUnion(wildon)\nHypothetic(wildon)\nUncork(leticia, wildon)\nUncork(leticia, birgitta)\nUncork(birgitta, wildon)\nProfane(birgitta, naoma)\nProfane(birgitta, leticia)\nHypothetic(birgitta) and Profane(birgitta, leticia) -> Profane(leticia, birgitta)\nforall x (Cane(x, leticia) and Synoptical(leticia) -> Tailed(leticia))\nProfane(leticia, birgitta) and Profane(leticia, wildon) -> Uncork(leticia, wildon)\nProfane(birgitta, leticia) and Tailed(birgitta) -> Hypothetic(birgitta)\nFaithful(birgitta) and Uncork(birgitta, naoma) -> Uncork(birgitta, wildon)\nforall x (Uncork(x, birgitta) -> Cane(x, wildon))\nforall x (Uncork(x, naoma) -> Profane(x, wildon))\nforall x (Profane(x, naoma) -> Tailed(x))\n\nCane(leticia, wildon)\n\nUncork(leticia, birgitta) and forall x (Uncork(x, birgitta) -> Cane(x, wildon)) -> therefore Cane(leticia, wildon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The lanie is sinewy. The lanie is indulgent. The lanie allude the bruno. The lanie allude the merissa. The bruno polymerize the merissa. The bruno is sinewy. The bruno is indulgent. The merissa polymerize the bruno. The merissa polymerize the kellina. The kellina polymerize the bruno. The kellina gasconade the lanie. The kellina gasconade the merissa. If the kellina is indulgent and the kellina gasconade the merissa then the merissa gasconade the kellina. If someone allude the merissa and the merissa is manorial then the merissa is dignifying. If the merissa gasconade the kellina and the merissa gasconade the bruno then the merissa polymerize the bruno. If the kellina gasconade the merissa and the kellina is dignifying then the kellina is indulgent. If the kellina is donnian and the kellina polymerize the lanie then the kellina polymerize the bruno. If someone polymerize the kellina then they see the bruno. If someone polymerize the lanie then they like the bruno. If someone gasconade the lanie then they are dignifying. The kellina is not dignifying.", "logic": "\nSinewy(lanie)\nIndulgent(lanie)\nAllude(lanie, bruno)\nAllude(lanie, merissa)\nPolymerize(bruno, merissa)\nSinewy(bruno)\nIndulgent(bruno)\nPolymerize(merissa, bruno)\nPolymerize(merissa, kellina)\nPolymerize(kellina, bruno)\nGasconade(kellina, lanie)\nGasconade(kellina, merissa)\nIndulgent(kellina) and Gasconade(kellina, merissa) -> Gasconade(merissa, kellina)\nforall x (Allude(x, merissa) and Manorial(merissa) -> Dignifying(merissa))\nGasconade(merissa, kellina) and Gasconade(merissa, bruno) -> Polymerize(merissa, bruno)\nGasconade(kellina, merissa) and Dignifying(kellina) -> Indulgent(kellina)\nDonnian(kellina) and Polymerize(kellina, lanie) -> Polymerize(kellina, bruno)\nforall x (Polymerize(x, kellina) -> Allude(x, bruno))\nforall x (Polymerize(x, lanie) -> Gasconade(x, bruno))\nforall x (Gasconade(x, lanie) -> Dignifying(x))\n\nnot Dignifying(kellina)\n\nGasconade(kellina, lanie) and forall x (Gasconade(x, lanie) -> Dignifying(x)) -> therefore Dignifying(kellina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The brinkley is denotive. The brinkley is huffy. The brinkley abrogate the eberhard. The brinkley abrogate the kathy. The eberhard trill the kathy. The eberhard is denotive. The eberhard is huffy. The kathy trill the eberhard. The kathy trill the hester. The hester trill the eberhard. The hester cuff the brinkley. The hester cuff the kathy. If the hester is huffy and the hester cuff the kathy then the kathy cuff the hester. If someone abrogate the kathy and the kathy is basiscopic then the kathy is tailed. If the kathy cuff the hester and the kathy cuff the eberhard then the kathy trill the eberhard. If the hester cuff the kathy and the hester is tailed then the hester is huffy. If the hester is echoless and the hester trill the brinkley then the hester trill the eberhard. If someone trill the hester then they see the eberhard. If someone trill the brinkley then they like the eberhard. If someone cuff the brinkley then they are tailed. The hester is huffy.", "logic": "\nDenotive(brinkley)\nHuffy(brinkley)\nAbrogate(brinkley, eberhard)\nAbrogate(brinkley, kathy)\nTrill(eberhard, kathy)\nDenotive(eberhard)\nHuffy(eberhard)\nTrill(kathy, eberhard)\nTrill(kathy, hester)\nTrill(hester, eberhard)\nCuff(hester, brinkley)\nCuff(hester, kathy)\nHuffy(hester) and Cuff(hester, kathy) -> Cuff(kathy, hester)\nforall x (Abrogate(x, kathy) and Basiscopic(kathy) -> Tailed(kathy))\nCuff(kathy, hester) and Cuff(kathy, eberhard) -> Trill(kathy, eberhard)\nCuff(hester, kathy) and Tailed(hester) -> Huffy(hester)\nEcholess(hester) and Trill(hester, brinkley) -> Trill(hester, eberhard)\nforall x (Trill(x, hester) -> Abrogate(x, eberhard))\nforall x (Trill(x, brinkley) -> Cuff(x, eberhard))\nforall x (Cuff(x, brinkley) -> Tailed(x))\n\nHuffy(hester)\n\nCuff(hester, brinkley) and forall x (Cuff(x, brinkley) -> Tailed(x)) -> therefore Tailed(hester) Cuff(hester, kathy) and Tailed(hester) and Cuff(hester, kathy) and Tailed(hester) -> Huffy(hester) -> therefore Huffy(hester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The zacharias is volute. The zacharias is invariant. The zacharias ghettoise the nev. The zacharias ghettoise the tarzan. The nev plaster the tarzan. The nev is volute. The nev is invariant. The tarzan plaster the nev. The tarzan plaster the jotham. The jotham plaster the nev. The jotham advantage the zacharias. The jotham advantage the tarzan. If the jotham is invariant and the jotham advantage the tarzan then the tarzan advantage the jotham. If someone ghettoise the tarzan and the tarzan is marbleized then the tarzan is carotid. If the tarzan advantage the jotham and the tarzan advantage the nev then the tarzan plaster the nev. If the jotham advantage the tarzan and the jotham is carotid then the jotham is invariant. If the jotham is consequent and the jotham plaster the zacharias then the jotham plaster the nev. If someone plaster the jotham then they see the nev. If someone plaster the zacharias then they like the nev. If someone advantage the zacharias then they are carotid. The jotham is not invariant.", "logic": "\nVolute(zacharias)\nInvariant(zacharias)\nGhettoise(zacharias, nev)\nGhettoise(zacharias, tarzan)\nPlaster(nev, tarzan)\nVolute(nev)\nInvariant(nev)\nPlaster(tarzan, nev)\nPlaster(tarzan, jotham)\nPlaster(jotham, nev)\nAdvantage(jotham, zacharias)\nAdvantage(jotham, tarzan)\nInvariant(jotham) and Advantage(jotham, tarzan) -> Advantage(tarzan, jotham)\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, tarzan) and Marbleized(tarzan) -> Carotid(tarzan))\nAdvantage(tarzan, jotham) and Advantage(tarzan, nev) -> Plaster(tarzan, nev)\nAdvantage(jotham, tarzan) and Carotid(jotham) -> Invariant(jotham)\nConsequent(jotham) and Plaster(jotham, zacharias) -> Plaster(jotham, nev)\nforall x (Plaster(x, jotham) -> Ghettoise(x, nev))\nforall x (Plaster(x, zacharias) -> Advantage(x, nev))\nforall x (Advantage(x, zacharias) -> Carotid(x))\n\nnot Invariant(jotham)\n\nAdvantage(jotham, zacharias) and forall x (Advantage(x, zacharias) -> Carotid(x)) -> therefore Carotid(jotham) Advantage(jotham, tarzan) and Carotid(jotham) and Advantage(jotham, tarzan) and Carotid(jotham) -> Invariant(jotham) -> therefore Invariant(jotham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The germain is elusive. The germain is noncurrent. The germain evict the marabel. The germain evict the nike. The marabel drub the nike. The marabel is elusive. The marabel is noncurrent. The nike drub the marabel. The nike drub the moishe. The moishe drub the marabel. The moishe foreordain the germain. The moishe foreordain the nike. If the moishe is noncurrent and the moishe foreordain the nike then the nike foreordain the moishe. If someone evict the nike and the nike is abounding then the nike is forceful. If the nike foreordain the moishe and the nike foreordain the marabel then the nike drub the marabel. If the moishe foreordain the nike and the moishe is forceful then the moishe is noncurrent. If the moishe is upraised and the moishe drub the germain then the moishe drub the marabel. If someone drub the moishe then they see the marabel. If someone drub the germain then they like the marabel. If someone foreordain the germain then they are forceful. The nike foreordain the moishe.", "logic": "\nElusive(germain)\nNoncurrent(germain)\nEvict(germain, marabel)\nEvict(germain, nike)\nDrub(marabel, nike)\nElusive(marabel)\nNoncurrent(marabel)\nDrub(nike, marabel)\nDrub(nike, moishe)\nDrub(moishe, marabel)\nForeordain(moishe, germain)\nForeordain(moishe, nike)\nNoncurrent(moishe) and Foreordain(moishe, nike) -> Foreordain(nike, moishe)\nforall x (Evict(x, nike) and Abounding(nike) -> Forceful(nike))\nForeordain(nike, moishe) and Foreordain(nike, marabel) -> Drub(nike, marabel)\nForeordain(moishe, nike) and Forceful(moishe) -> Noncurrent(moishe)\nUpraised(moishe) and Drub(moishe, germain) -> Drub(moishe, marabel)\nforall x (Drub(x, moishe) -> Evict(x, marabel))\nforall x (Drub(x, germain) -> Foreordain(x, marabel))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, germain) -> Forceful(x))\n\nForeordain(nike, moishe)\n\nForeordain(moishe, germain) and forall x (Foreordain(x, germain) -> Forceful(x)) -> therefore Forceful(moishe) Foreordain(moishe, nike) and Forceful(moishe) and Foreordain(moishe, nike) and Forceful(moishe) -> Noncurrent(moishe) -> therefore Noncurrent(moishe) Noncurrent(moishe) and Foreordain(moishe, nike) and Noncurrent(moishe) and Foreordain(moishe, nike) -> Foreordain(nike, moishe) -> therefore Foreordain(nike, moishe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The adeline is ringed. The adeline is dashed. The adeline audit the reinhard. The adeline audit the ignacius. The reinhard reign the ignacius. The reinhard is ringed. The reinhard is dashed. The ignacius reign the reinhard. The ignacius reign the zondra. The zondra reign the reinhard. The zondra pantomime the adeline. The zondra pantomime the ignacius. If the zondra is dashed and the zondra pantomime the ignacius then the ignacius pantomime the zondra. If someone audit the ignacius and the ignacius is kokka then the ignacius is tepid. If the ignacius pantomime the zondra and the ignacius pantomime the reinhard then the ignacius reign the reinhard. If the zondra pantomime the ignacius and the zondra is tepid then the zondra is dashed. If the zondra is pretty and the zondra reign the adeline then the zondra reign the reinhard. If someone reign the zondra then they see the reinhard. If someone reign the adeline then they like the reinhard. If someone pantomime the adeline then they are tepid. The ignacius does not like the zondra.", "logic": "\nRinged(adeline)\nDashed(adeline)\nAudit(adeline, reinhard)\nAudit(adeline, ignacius)\nReign(reinhard, ignacius)\nRinged(reinhard)\nDashed(reinhard)\nReign(ignacius, reinhard)\nReign(ignacius, zondra)\nReign(zondra, reinhard)\nPantomime(zondra, adeline)\nPantomime(zondra, ignacius)\nDashed(zondra) and Pantomime(zondra, ignacius) -> Pantomime(ignacius, zondra)\nforall x (Audit(x, ignacius) and Kokka(ignacius) -> Tepid(ignacius))\nPantomime(ignacius, zondra) and Pantomime(ignacius, reinhard) -> Reign(ignacius, reinhard)\nPantomime(zondra, ignacius) and Tepid(zondra) -> Dashed(zondra)\nPretty(zondra) and Reign(zondra, adeline) -> Reign(zondra, reinhard)\nforall x (Reign(x, zondra) -> Audit(x, reinhard))\nforall x (Reign(x, adeline) -> Pantomime(x, reinhard))\nforall x (Pantomime(x, adeline) -> Tepid(x))\n\nnot Pantomime(ignacius, zondra)\n\nPantomime(zondra, adeline) and forall x (Pantomime(x, adeline) -> Tepid(x)) -> therefore Tepid(zondra) Pantomime(zondra, ignacius) and Tepid(zondra) and Pantomime(zondra, ignacius) and Tepid(zondra) -> Dashed(zondra) -> therefore Dashed(zondra) Dashed(zondra) and Pantomime(zondra, ignacius) and Dashed(zondra) and Pantomime(zondra, ignacius) -> Pantomime(ignacius, zondra) -> therefore Pantomime(ignacius, zondra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The lindie is worrying. The lindie is bosky. The lindie pulse the guido. The lindie pulse the barney. The guido hoodwink the barney. The guido is worrying. The guido is bosky. The barney hoodwink the guido. The barney hoodwink the quigman. The quigman hoodwink the guido. The quigman broom the lindie. The quigman broom the barney. If the quigman is bosky and the quigman broom the barney then the barney broom the quigman. If someone pulse the barney and the barney is pressor then the barney is unexcelled. If the barney broom the quigman and the barney broom the guido then the barney hoodwink the guido. If the quigman broom the barney and the quigman is unexcelled then the quigman is bosky. If the quigman is biloculate and the quigman hoodwink the lindie then the quigman hoodwink the guido. If someone hoodwink the quigman then they see the guido. If someone hoodwink the lindie then they like the guido. If someone broom the lindie then they are unexcelled. The guido is not unexcelled.", "logic": "\nWorrying(lindie)\nBosky(lindie)\nPulse(lindie, guido)\nPulse(lindie, barney)\nHoodwink(guido, barney)\nWorrying(guido)\nBosky(guido)\nHoodwink(barney, guido)\nHoodwink(barney, quigman)\nHoodwink(quigman, guido)\nBroom(quigman, lindie)\nBroom(quigman, barney)\nBosky(quigman) and Broom(quigman, barney) -> Broom(barney, quigman)\nforall x (Pulse(x, barney) and Pressor(barney) -> Unexcelled(barney))\nBroom(barney, quigman) and Broom(barney, guido) -> Hoodwink(barney, guido)\nBroom(quigman, barney) and Unexcelled(quigman) -> Bosky(quigman)\nBiloculate(quigman) and Hoodwink(quigman, lindie) -> Hoodwink(quigman, guido)\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, quigman) -> Pulse(x, guido))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, lindie) -> Broom(x, guido))\nforall x (Broom(x, lindie) -> Unexcelled(x))\n\nnot Unexcelled(guido)\n\nforall x (Broom(x, lindie) -> Unexcelled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The hannibal is unheated. The hannibal is andorran. The hannibal slack the barth. The hannibal slack the paton. The barth hinge the paton. The barth is unheated. The barth is andorran. The paton hinge the barth. The paton hinge the rosaleen. The rosaleen hinge the barth. The rosaleen obtrude the hannibal. The rosaleen obtrude the paton. If the rosaleen is andorran and the rosaleen obtrude the paton then the paton obtrude the rosaleen. If someone slack the paton and the paton is isotropous then the paton is soleless. If the paton obtrude the rosaleen and the paton obtrude the barth then the paton hinge the barth. If the rosaleen obtrude the paton and the rosaleen is soleless then the rosaleen is andorran. If the rosaleen is synovial and the rosaleen hinge the hannibal then the rosaleen hinge the barth. If someone hinge the rosaleen then they see the barth. If someone hinge the hannibal then they like the barth. If someone obtrude the hannibal then they are soleless. The barth slack the barth.", "logic": "\nUnheated(hannibal)\nAndorran(hannibal)\nSlack(hannibal, barth)\nSlack(hannibal, paton)\nHinge(barth, paton)\nUnheated(barth)\nAndorran(barth)\nHinge(paton, barth)\nHinge(paton, rosaleen)\nHinge(rosaleen, barth)\nObtrude(rosaleen, hannibal)\nObtrude(rosaleen, paton)\nAndorran(rosaleen) and Obtrude(rosaleen, paton) -> Obtrude(paton, rosaleen)\nforall x (Slack(x, paton) and Isotropous(paton) -> Soleless(paton))\nObtrude(paton, rosaleen) and Obtrude(paton, barth) -> Hinge(paton, barth)\nObtrude(rosaleen, paton) and Soleless(rosaleen) -> Andorran(rosaleen)\nSynovial(rosaleen) and Hinge(rosaleen, hannibal) -> Hinge(rosaleen, barth)\nforall x (Hinge(x, rosaleen) -> Slack(x, barth))\nforall x (Hinge(x, hannibal) -> Obtrude(x, barth))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, hannibal) -> Soleless(x))\n\nSlack(barth, barth)\n\nforall x (Hinge(x, rosaleen) -> Slack(x, barth)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The ceciley is vitiated. The ceciley is colossal. The ceciley dizzy the tamra. The ceciley dizzy the engelbart. The tamra squawk the engelbart. The tamra is vitiated. The tamra is colossal. The engelbart squawk the tamra. The engelbart squawk the laura. The laura squawk the tamra. The laura enamour the ceciley. The laura enamour the engelbart. If the laura is colossal and the laura enamour the engelbart then the engelbart enamour the laura. If someone dizzy the engelbart and the engelbart is contrabass then the engelbart is nonfatal. If the engelbart enamour the laura and the engelbart enamour the tamra then the engelbart squawk the tamra. If the laura enamour the engelbart and the laura is nonfatal then the laura is colossal. If the laura is gaumless and the laura squawk the ceciley then the laura squawk the tamra. If someone squawk the laura then they see the tamra. If someone squawk the ceciley then they like the tamra. If someone enamour the ceciley then they are nonfatal. The engelbart does not like the tamra.", "logic": "\nVitiated(ceciley)\nColossal(ceciley)\nDizzy(ceciley, tamra)\nDizzy(ceciley, engelbart)\nSquawk(tamra, engelbart)\nVitiated(tamra)\nColossal(tamra)\nSquawk(engelbart, tamra)\nSquawk(engelbart, laura)\nSquawk(laura, tamra)\nEnamour(laura, ceciley)\nEnamour(laura, engelbart)\nColossal(laura) and Enamour(laura, engelbart) -> Enamour(engelbart, laura)\nforall x (Dizzy(x, engelbart) and Contrabass(engelbart) -> Nonfatal(engelbart))\nEnamour(engelbart, laura) and Enamour(engelbart, tamra) -> Squawk(engelbart, tamra)\nEnamour(laura, engelbart) and Nonfatal(laura) -> Colossal(laura)\nGaumless(laura) and Squawk(laura, ceciley) -> Squawk(laura, tamra)\nforall x (Squawk(x, laura) -> Dizzy(x, tamra))\nforall x (Squawk(x, ceciley) -> Enamour(x, tamra))\nforall x (Enamour(x, ceciley) -> Nonfatal(x))\n\nnot Enamour(engelbart, tamra)\n\nforall x (Squawk(x, ceciley) -> Enamour(x, tamra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The pearla is duplicate. The pearla is unfertile. The pearla insult the ronnie. The pearla insult the syd. The ronnie pierce the syd. The ronnie is duplicate. The ronnie is unfertile. The syd pierce the ronnie. The syd pierce the ilene. The ilene pierce the ronnie. The ilene resole the pearla. The ilene resole the syd. If the ilene is unfertile and the ilene resole the syd then the syd resole the ilene. If someone insult the syd and the syd is glad then the syd is portrayed. If the syd resole the ilene and the syd resole the ronnie then the syd pierce the ronnie. If the ilene resole the syd and the ilene is portrayed then the ilene is unfertile. If the ilene is humpbacked and the ilene pierce the pearla then the ilene pierce the ronnie. If someone pierce the ilene then they see the ronnie. If someone pierce the pearla then they like the ronnie. If someone resole the pearla then they are portrayed. The ilene insult the ronnie.", "logic": "\nDuplicate(pearla)\nUnfertile(pearla)\nInsult(pearla, ronnie)\nInsult(pearla, syd)\nPierce(ronnie, syd)\nDuplicate(ronnie)\nUnfertile(ronnie)\nPierce(syd, ronnie)\nPierce(syd, ilene)\nPierce(ilene, ronnie)\nResole(ilene, pearla)\nResole(ilene, syd)\nUnfertile(ilene) and Resole(ilene, syd) -> Resole(syd, ilene)\nforall x (Insult(x, syd) and Glad(syd) -> Portrayed(syd))\nResole(syd, ilene) and Resole(syd, ronnie) -> Pierce(syd, ronnie)\nResole(ilene, syd) and Portrayed(ilene) -> Unfertile(ilene)\nHumpbacked(ilene) and Pierce(ilene, pearla) -> Pierce(ilene, ronnie)\nforall x (Pierce(x, ilene) -> Insult(x, ronnie))\nforall x (Pierce(x, pearla) -> Resole(x, ronnie))\nforall x (Resole(x, pearla) -> Portrayed(x))\n\nInsult(ilene, ronnie)\n\nforall x (Pierce(x, ilene) -> Insult(x, ronnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The garrot is batholitic. The garrot is laid. The garrot jockey the nicola. The garrot jockey the jemmy. The nicola unmake the jemmy. The nicola is batholitic. The nicola is laid. The jemmy unmake the nicola. The jemmy unmake the whitman. The whitman unmake the nicola. The whitman maculate the garrot. The whitman maculate the jemmy. If the whitman is laid and the whitman maculate the jemmy then the jemmy maculate the whitman. If someone jockey the jemmy and the jemmy is surd then the jemmy is fibreoptic. If the jemmy maculate the whitman and the jemmy maculate the nicola then the jemmy unmake the nicola. If the whitman maculate the jemmy and the whitman is fibreoptic then the whitman is laid. If the whitman is rackety and the whitman unmake the garrot then the whitman unmake the nicola. If someone unmake the whitman then they see the nicola. If someone unmake the garrot then they like the nicola. If someone maculate the garrot then they are fibreoptic. The jemmy does not like the jemmy.", "logic": "\nBatholitic(garrot)\nLaid(garrot)\nJockey(garrot, nicola)\nJockey(garrot, jemmy)\nUnmake(nicola, jemmy)\nBatholitic(nicola)\nLaid(nicola)\nUnmake(jemmy, nicola)\nUnmake(jemmy, whitman)\nUnmake(whitman, nicola)\nMaculate(whitman, garrot)\nMaculate(whitman, jemmy)\nLaid(whitman) and Maculate(whitman, jemmy) -> Maculate(jemmy, whitman)\nforall x (Jockey(x, jemmy) and Surd(jemmy) -> Fibreoptic(jemmy))\nMaculate(jemmy, whitman) and Maculate(jemmy, nicola) -> Unmake(jemmy, nicola)\nMaculate(whitman, jemmy) and Fibreoptic(whitman) -> Laid(whitman)\nRackety(whitman) and Unmake(whitman, garrot) -> Unmake(whitman, nicola)\nforall x (Unmake(x, whitman) -> Jockey(x, nicola))\nforall x (Unmake(x, garrot) -> Maculate(x, nicola))\nforall x (Maculate(x, garrot) -> Fibreoptic(x))\n\nnot Maculate(jemmy, jemmy)\n\nnot Maculate(jemmy, jemmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The debee is crinkly. The debee is unsnarled. The debee fade the dorene. The debee fade the page. The dorene reprimand the page. The dorene is crinkly. The dorene is unsnarled. The page reprimand the dorene. The page reprimand the joab. The joab reprimand the dorene. The joab stutter the debee. The joab stutter the page. If the joab is unsnarled and the joab stutter the page then the page stutter the joab. If someone fade the page and the page is routine then the page is contralto. If the page stutter the joab and the page stutter the dorene then the page reprimand the dorene. If the joab stutter the page and the joab is contralto then the joab is unsnarled. If the joab is feminist and the joab reprimand the debee then the joab reprimand the dorene. If someone reprimand the joab then they see the dorene. If someone reprimand the debee then they like the dorene. If someone stutter the debee then they are contralto. The joab fade the page.", "logic": "\nCrinkly(debee)\nUnsnarled(debee)\nFade(debee, dorene)\nFade(debee, page)\nReprimand(dorene, page)\nCrinkly(dorene)\nUnsnarled(dorene)\nReprimand(page, dorene)\nReprimand(page, joab)\nReprimand(joab, dorene)\nStutter(joab, debee)\nStutter(joab, page)\nUnsnarled(joab) and Stutter(joab, page) -> Stutter(page, joab)\nforall x (Fade(x, page) and Routine(page) -> Contralto(page))\nStutter(page, joab) and Stutter(page, dorene) -> Reprimand(page, dorene)\nStutter(joab, page) and Contralto(joab) -> Unsnarled(joab)\nFeminist(joab) and Reprimand(joab, debee) -> Reprimand(joab, dorene)\nforall x (Reprimand(x, joab) -> Fade(x, dorene))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, debee) -> Stutter(x, dorene))\nforall x (Stutter(x, debee) -> Contralto(x))\n\nFade(joab, page)\n\nFade(joab, page) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The lyndsey is melted. The lyndsey is thieving. The lyndsey binge the bonita. The lyndsey binge the ronen. The bonita default the ronen. The bonita is melted. The bonita is thieving. The ronen default the bonita. The ronen default the kincaid. The kincaid default the bonita. The kincaid disport the lyndsey. The kincaid disport the ronen. If the kincaid is thieving and the kincaid disport the ronen then the ronen disport the kincaid. If someone binge the ronen and the ronen is indie then the ronen is viatical. If the ronen disport the kincaid and the ronen disport the bonita then the ronen default the bonita. If the kincaid disport the ronen and the kincaid is viatical then the kincaid is thieving. If the kincaid is pubic and the kincaid default the lyndsey then the kincaid default the bonita. If someone default the kincaid then they see the bonita. If someone default the lyndsey then they like the bonita. If someone disport the lyndsey then they are viatical. The lyndsey does not see the lyndsey.", "logic": "\nMelted(lyndsey)\nThieving(lyndsey)\nBinge(lyndsey, bonita)\nBinge(lyndsey, ronen)\nDefault(bonita, ronen)\nMelted(bonita)\nThieving(bonita)\nDefault(ronen, bonita)\nDefault(ronen, kincaid)\nDefault(kincaid, bonita)\nDisport(kincaid, lyndsey)\nDisport(kincaid, ronen)\nThieving(kincaid) and Disport(kincaid, ronen) -> Disport(ronen, kincaid)\nforall x (Binge(x, ronen) and Indie(ronen) -> Viatical(ronen))\nDisport(ronen, kincaid) and Disport(ronen, bonita) -> Default(ronen, bonita)\nDisport(kincaid, ronen) and Viatical(kincaid) -> Thieving(kincaid)\nPubic(kincaid) and Default(kincaid, lyndsey) -> Default(kincaid, bonita)\nforall x (Default(x, kincaid) -> Binge(x, bonita))\nforall x (Default(x, lyndsey) -> Disport(x, bonita))\nforall x (Disport(x, lyndsey) -> Viatical(x))\n\nnot Binge(lyndsey, lyndsey)\n\nnot Binge(lyndsey, lyndsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The jeana is rouged. The jeana is fivefold. The jeana whirr the erina. The jeana whirr the laura. The erina upstage the laura. The erina is rouged. The erina is fivefold. The laura upstage the erina. The laura upstage the oprah. The oprah upstage the erina. The oprah embrittle the jeana. The oprah embrittle the laura. If the oprah is fivefold and the oprah embrittle the laura then the laura embrittle the oprah. If someone whirr the laura and the laura is shitty then the laura is sorcerous. If the laura embrittle the oprah and the laura embrittle the erina then the laura upstage the erina. If the oprah embrittle the laura and the oprah is sorcerous then the oprah is fivefold. If the oprah is memberless and the oprah upstage the jeana then the oprah upstage the erina. If someone upstage the oprah then they see the erina. If someone upstage the jeana then they like the erina. If someone embrittle the jeana then they are sorcerous. The oprah is rouged.", "logic": "\nRouged(jeana)\nFivefold(jeana)\nWhirr(jeana, erina)\nWhirr(jeana, laura)\nUpstage(erina, laura)\nRouged(erina)\nFivefold(erina)\nUpstage(laura, erina)\nUpstage(laura, oprah)\nUpstage(oprah, erina)\nEmbrittle(oprah, jeana)\nEmbrittle(oprah, laura)\nFivefold(oprah) and Embrittle(oprah, laura) -> Embrittle(laura, oprah)\nforall x (Whirr(x, laura) and Shitty(laura) -> Sorcerous(laura))\nEmbrittle(laura, oprah) and Embrittle(laura, erina) -> Upstage(laura, erina)\nEmbrittle(oprah, laura) and Sorcerous(oprah) -> Fivefold(oprah)\nMemberless(oprah) and Upstage(oprah, jeana) -> Upstage(oprah, erina)\nforall x (Upstage(x, oprah) -> Whirr(x, erina))\nforall x (Upstage(x, jeana) -> Embrittle(x, erina))\nforall x (Embrittle(x, jeana) -> Sorcerous(x))\n\nRouged(oprah)\n\nRouged(oprah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Isaac is cuboidal. Willy is cordiform. Warden is nightlong. All cordiform things are nubby. All xlviii things are nightlong. If something is nubby and cordiform then it is xlviii. Isaac is cuboidal.", "logic": "\nCuboidal(isaac)\nCordiform(willy)\nNightlong(warden)\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> Nubby(x))\nforall x (Xlviii(x) -> Nightlong(x))\nforall x (Nubby(x) and Cordiform(x) -> Xlviii(x))\n\nCuboidal(isaac)\n\ntherefore Cuboidal(isaac)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Nat is union. Maureen is divorced. Lyndel is unfurrowed. All divorced things are throwback. All nosohusial things are unfurrowed. If something is throwback and divorced then it is nosohusial. Lyndel is not unfurrowed.", "logic": "\nUnion(nat)\nDivorced(maureen)\nUnfurrowed(lyndel)\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Throwback(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> Unfurrowed(x))\nforall x (Throwback(x) and Divorced(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\n\nnot Unfurrowed(lyndel)\n\ntherefore Unfurrowed(lyndel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Miguel is decurved. Annetta is fifty. Jaquelyn is atactic. All fifty things are squirting. All shouted things are atactic. If something is squirting and fifty then it is shouted. Annetta is squirting.", "logic": "\nDecurved(miguel)\nFifty(annetta)\nAtactic(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Fifty(x) -> Squirting(x))\nforall x (Shouted(x) -> Atactic(x))\nforall x (Squirting(x) and Fifty(x) -> Shouted(x))\n\nSquirting(annetta)\n\nFifty(annetta) and forall x (Fifty(x) -> Squirting(x)) -> therefore Squirting(annetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Delora is late. Hashim is naval. Vito is ringleted. All naval things are taped. All uncaused things are ringleted. If something is taped and naval then it is uncaused. Hashim is not taped.", "logic": "\nLate(delora)\nNaval(hashim)\nRingleted(vito)\nforall x (Naval(x) -> Taped(x))\nforall x (Uncaused(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Taped(x) and Naval(x) -> Uncaused(x))\n\nnot Taped(hashim)\n\nNaval(hashim) and forall x (Naval(x) -> Taped(x)) -> therefore Taped(hashim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Noble is favored. Stella is regulatory. Kim is cousinly. All regulatory things are rejective. All earthbound things are cousinly. If something is rejective and regulatory then it is earthbound. Stella is earthbound.", "logic": "\nFavored(noble)\nRegulatory(stella)\nCousinly(kim)\nforall x (Regulatory(x) -> Rejective(x))\nforall x (Earthbound(x) -> Cousinly(x))\nforall x (Rejective(x) and Regulatory(x) -> Earthbound(x))\n\nEarthbound(stella)\n\nRegulatory(stella) and forall x (Regulatory(x) -> Rejective(x)) -> therefore Rejective(stella) Rejective(stella) and Regulatory(stella) and forall x (Rejective(x) and Regulatory(x) -> Earthbound(x)) -> therefore Earthbound(stella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Leanor is extreme. Gwenette is thalassic. Joane is siamese. All thalassic things are unstarred. All anodyne things are siamese. If something is unstarred and thalassic then it is anodyne. Gwenette is not anodyne.", "logic": "\nExtreme(leanor)\nThalassic(gwenette)\nSiamese(joane)\nforall x (Thalassic(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Siamese(x))\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and Thalassic(x) -> Anodyne(x))\n\nnot Anodyne(gwenette)\n\nThalassic(gwenette) and forall x (Thalassic(x) -> Unstarred(x)) -> therefore Unstarred(gwenette) Unstarred(gwenette) and Thalassic(gwenette) and forall x (Unstarred(x) and Thalassic(x) -> Anodyne(x)) -> therefore Anodyne(gwenette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Zara is mawkish. Bengt is workaday. Barbie is wainscoted. All workaday things are somali. All mesonic things are wainscoted. If something is somali and workaday then it is mesonic. Bengt is wainscoted.", "logic": "\nMawkish(zara)\nWorkaday(bengt)\nWainscoted(barbie)\nforall x (Workaday(x) -> Somali(x))\nforall x (Mesonic(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Somali(x) and Workaday(x) -> Mesonic(x))\n\nWainscoted(bengt)\n\nWorkaday(bengt) and forall x (Workaday(x) -> Somali(x)) -> therefore Somali(bengt) Somali(bengt) and Workaday(bengt) and forall x (Somali(x) and Workaday(x) -> Mesonic(x)) -> therefore Mesonic(bengt) Mesonic(bengt) and forall x (Mesonic(x) -> Wainscoted(x)) -> therefore Wainscoted(bengt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Marleen is semilunar. Tommy is amusive. Tomkin is attended. All amusive things are unoriginal. All legal things are attended. If something is unoriginal and amusive then it is legal. Tommy is not attended.", "logic": "\nSemilunar(marleen)\nAmusive(tommy)\nAttended(tomkin)\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nforall x (Legal(x) -> Attended(x))\nforall x (Unoriginal(x) and Amusive(x) -> Legal(x))\n\nnot Attended(tommy)\n\nAmusive(tommy) and forall x (Amusive(x) -> Unoriginal(x)) -> therefore Unoriginal(tommy) Unoriginal(tommy) and Amusive(tommy) and forall x (Unoriginal(x) and Amusive(x) -> Legal(x)) -> therefore Legal(tommy) Legal(tommy) and forall x (Legal(x) -> Attended(x)) -> therefore Attended(tommy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Steve is cavalier. Emalee is roundish. Dacey is ironical. All roundish things are dabbled. All arboriform things are ironical. If something is dabbled and roundish then it is arboriform. Steve is not dabbled.", "logic": "\nCavalier(steve)\nRoundish(emalee)\nIronical(dacey)\nforall x (Roundish(x) -> Dabbled(x))\nforall x (Arboriform(x) -> Ironical(x))\nforall x (Dabbled(x) and Roundish(x) -> Arboriform(x))\n\nnot Dabbled(steve)\n\nforall x (Roundish(x) -> Dabbled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Tove is penciled. Germaine is goddamn. Renel is chapleted. All goddamn things are imbricated. All crenated things are chapleted. If something is imbricated and goddamn then it is crenated. Tove is crenated.", "logic": "\nPenciled(tove)\nGoddamn(germaine)\nChapleted(renel)\nforall x (Goddamn(x) -> Imbricated(x))\nforall x (Crenated(x) -> Chapleted(x))\nforall x (Imbricated(x) and Goddamn(x) -> Crenated(x))\n\nCrenated(tove)\n\nforall x (Imbricated(x) and Goddamn(x) -> Crenated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Reynolds is mediate. Shelia is repetitive. Stu is adjective. All repetitive things are sericeous. All puffy things are adjective. If something is sericeous and repetitive then it is puffy. Reynolds is not adjective.", "logic": "\nMediate(reynolds)\nRepetitive(shelia)\nAdjective(stu)\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Adjective(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Repetitive(x) -> Puffy(x))\n\nnot Adjective(reynolds)\n\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Adjective(x)) <- forall x (Sericeous(x) and Repetitive(x) -> Puffy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Maire is solomonic. Ami is total. Orren is impatient. All total things are cadaverous. All cushy things are impatient. If something is cadaverous and total then it is cushy. Orren is cushy.", "logic": "\nSolomonic(maire)\nTotal(ami)\nImpatient(orren)\nforall x (Total(x) -> Cadaverous(x))\nforall x (Cushy(x) -> Impatient(x))\nforall x (Cadaverous(x) and Total(x) -> Cushy(x))\n\nCushy(orren)\n\nforall x (Cadaverous(x) and Total(x) -> Cushy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Genni is frisian. Fenelia is thrown. Rici is hyaloid. All thrown things are convenient. All toothlike things are hyaloid. If something is convenient and thrown then it is toothlike. Rici is not nice.", "logic": "\nFrisian(genni)\nThrown(fenelia)\nHyaloid(rici)\nforall x (Thrown(x) -> Convenient(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Hyaloid(x))\nforall x (Convenient(x) and Thrown(x) -> Toothlike(x))\n\nnot Nice(rici)\n\nnot Nice(rici) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Minetta is jurassic. Lyndel is urinary. Ardenia is atrial. All urinary things are elegiac. All crenulate things are atrial. If something is elegiac and urinary then it is crenulate. Lyndel is nice.", "logic": "\nJurassic(minetta)\nUrinary(lyndel)\nAtrial(ardenia)\nforall x (Urinary(x) -> Elegiac(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Atrial(x))\nforall x (Elegiac(x) and Urinary(x) -> Crenulate(x))\n\nNice(lyndel)\n\nNice(lyndel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Arnold is fatalist. Asia is mediate. Hari is entrenched. All mediate things are saltlike. All blamable things are entrenched. If something is saltlike and mediate then it is blamable. Arnold is not young.", "logic": "\nFatalist(arnold)\nMediate(asia)\nEntrenched(hari)\nforall x (Mediate(x) -> Saltlike(x))\nforall x (Blamable(x) -> Entrenched(x))\nforall x (Saltlike(x) and Mediate(x) -> Blamable(x))\n\nnot Young(arnold)\n\nnot Young(arnold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Llewellyn is prepupal. Milka is sceptered. Bryant is galilean. All sceptered things are destitute. All chicken things are galilean. If something is destitute and sceptered then it is chicken. Bryant is young.", "logic": "\nPrepupal(llewellyn)\nSceptered(milka)\nGalilean(bryant)\nforall x (Sceptered(x) -> Destitute(x))\nforall x (Chicken(x) -> Galilean(x))\nforall x (Destitute(x) and Sceptered(x) -> Chicken(x))\n\nYoung(bryant)\n\nYoung(bryant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1358"} {"premises": "Troy is stuck. Sheff is landless. Round things are achromic. Troy is stuck.", "logic": "\nStuck(troy)\nLandless(sheff)\nforall x (Stuck(x) -> Achromic(x))\n\nStuck(troy)\n\ntherefore Stuck(troy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Van is niggardly. Carlynne is dampish. Round things are vapid. Van is not niggardly.", "logic": "\nNiggardly(van)\nDampish(carlynne)\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Vapid(x))\n\nnot Niggardly(van)\n\ntherefore Niggardly(van)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Latia is jobless. Leodora is excused. Round things are intuitive. Latia is intuitive.", "logic": "\nJobless(latia)\nExcused(leodora)\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Intuitive(x))\n\nIntuitive(latia)\n\nJobless(latia) and forall x (Jobless(x) -> Intuitive(x)) -> therefore Intuitive(latia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Marlowe is abuzz. Kelcy is muscular. Round things are accusative. Marlowe is not accusative.", "logic": "\nAbuzz(marlowe)\nMuscular(kelcy)\nforall x (Abuzz(x) -> Accusative(x))\n\nnot Accusative(marlowe)\n\nAbuzz(marlowe) and forall x (Abuzz(x) -> Accusative(x)) -> therefore Accusative(marlowe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Gordan is dorian. Phedra is alvine. Round things are inst. Phedra is not inst.", "logic": "\nDorian(gordan)\nAlvine(phedra)\nforall x (Dorian(x) -> Inst(x))\n\nnot Inst(phedra)\n\nforall x (Dorian(x) -> Inst(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Fan is nagging. Marion is maidenlike. Round things are twiglike. Fan is maidenlike.", "logic": "\nNagging(fan)\nMaidenlike(marion)\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Twiglike(x))\n\nMaidenlike(fan)\n\nMaidenlike(fan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Tera is deserted. Mala is totaled. Round things are conductive. Mala is not furry.", "logic": "\nDeserted(tera)\nTotaled(mala)\nforall x (Deserted(x) -> Conductive(x))\n\nnot Furry(mala)\n\nnot Furry(mala) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Sherie is midi. Mellisa is diagonal. Round things are boxed. Sherie is kind.", "logic": "\nMidi(sherie)\nDiagonal(mellisa)\nforall x (Midi(x) -> Boxed(x))\n\nKind(sherie)\n\nKind(sherie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1439"} {"premises": "Binni is dense. Binni is eternal. Binni is trackless. If Binni is dense and Binni is not suburban then Binni is antemortem. All suburban things are dense. If Binni is not dense then Binni is eternal. If Binni is greyed then Binni is trackless. All suburban things are not trackless. All suburban things are trackless. All suburban, greyed things are not trackless. If something is antemortem and not eternal then it is greyed. Binni is trackless.", "logic": "\nDense(binni)\nEternal(binni)\nTrackless(binni)\nDense(binni) and not Suburban(binni) -> Antemortem(binni)\nforall x (Suburban(x) -> Dense(x))\nnot Dense(binni) -> Eternal(binni)\nGreyed(binni) -> Trackless(binni)\nforall x (Suburban(x) -> not Trackless(x))\nforall x (Suburban(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Suburban(x) and Greyed(x) -> not Trackless(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) and not Eternal(x) -> Greyed(x))\n\nTrackless(binni)\n\ntherefore Trackless(binni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4008"} {"premises": "Emanuel is sovereign. Emanuel is uncultured. Emanuel is lingulate. If Emanuel is sovereign and Emanuel is not impelling then Emanuel is prevenient. All impelling things are sovereign. If Emanuel is not sovereign then Emanuel is uncultured. If Emanuel is fanciful then Emanuel is lingulate. All impelling things are not lingulate. All impelling things are lingulate. All impelling, fanciful things are not lingulate. If something is prevenient and not uncultured then it is fanciful. Emanuel is not sovereign.", "logic": "\nSovereign(emanuel)\nUncultured(emanuel)\nLingulate(emanuel)\nSovereign(emanuel) and not Impelling(emanuel) -> Prevenient(emanuel)\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nnot Sovereign(emanuel) -> Uncultured(emanuel)\nFanciful(emanuel) -> Lingulate(emanuel)\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> not Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Impelling(x) and Fanciful(x) -> not Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Prevenient(x) and not Uncultured(x) -> Fanciful(x))\n\nnot Sovereign(emanuel)\n\ntherefore Sovereign(emanuel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4008"} {"premises": "Angelina is pessimum. Angelina is woozy. Angelina is attractive. If Angelina is pessimum and Angelina is not polygynous then Angelina is woolly. All polygynous things are pessimum. If Angelina is not pessimum then Angelina is woozy. If Angelina is victimized then Angelina is attractive. All polygynous things are not attractive. All polygynous things are attractive. All polygynous, victimized things are not attractive. If something is woolly and not woozy then it is victimized. Angelina is not victimized.", "logic": "\nPessimum(angelina)\nWoozy(angelina)\nAttractive(angelina)\nPessimum(angelina) and not Polygynous(angelina) -> Woolly(angelina)\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nnot Pessimum(angelina) -> Woozy(angelina)\nVictimized(angelina) -> Attractive(angelina)\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> not Attractive(x))\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> Attractive(x))\nforall x (Polygynous(x) and Victimized(x) -> not Attractive(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) and not Woozy(x) -> Victimized(x))\n\nnot Victimized(angelina)\n\nforall x (Woolly(x) and not Woozy(x) -> Victimized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4008"} {"premises": "Gwyn is cubistic. Gwyn is navigable. Gwyn is baneful. If Gwyn is cubistic and Gwyn is not rodlike then Gwyn is metaphoric. All rodlike things are cubistic. If Gwyn is not cubistic then Gwyn is navigable. If Gwyn is damnatory then Gwyn is baneful. All rodlike things are not baneful. All rodlike things are baneful. All rodlike, damnatory things are not baneful. If something is metaphoric and not navigable then it is damnatory. Gwyn is kind.", "logic": "\nCubistic(gwyn)\nNavigable(gwyn)\nBaneful(gwyn)\nCubistic(gwyn) and not Rodlike(gwyn) -> Metaphoric(gwyn)\nforall x (Rodlike(x) -> Cubistic(x))\nnot Cubistic(gwyn) -> Navigable(gwyn)\nDamnatory(gwyn) -> Baneful(gwyn)\nforall x (Rodlike(x) -> not Baneful(x))\nforall x (Rodlike(x) -> Baneful(x))\nforall x (Rodlike(x) and Damnatory(x) -> not Baneful(x))\nforall x (Metaphoric(x) and not Navigable(x) -> Damnatory(x))\n\nKind(gwyn)\n\nKind(gwyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4008"} {"premises": "The pen is zygodactyl. The pen is nonpareil. The pen is queenlike. The pen conglobe the margarita. The margarita is intended. The margarita is queenlike. The margarita distress the mervin. The margarita conglobe the pen. The margarita conglobe the mervin. The effie is nonpareil. The effie distress the pen. The mervin scribble the pen. If something distress the margarita then it scribble the effie. If something scribble the pen and it distress the mervin then the mervin is queenlike. If the margarita distress the pen and the pen distress the effie then the pen conglobe the margarita. If something conglobe the effie then it scribble the pen. If something is intended then it conglobe the effie. If something distress the mervin and the mervin conglobe the pen then it conglobe the effie. The margarita is queenlike.", "logic": "\nZygodactyl(pen)\nNonpareil(pen)\nQueenlike(pen)\nConglobe(pen, margarita)\nIntended(margarita)\nQueenlike(margarita)\nDistress(margarita, mervin)\nConglobe(margarita, pen)\nConglobe(margarita, mervin)\nNonpareil(effie)\nDistress(effie, pen)\nScribble(mervin, pen)\nforall x (Distress(x, margarita) -> Scribble(x, effie))\nforall x (Scribble(x, pen) and Distress(x, mervin) -> Queenlike(mervin))\nDistress(margarita, pen) and Distress(pen, effie) -> Conglobe(pen, margarita)\nforall x (Conglobe(x, effie) -> Scribble(x, pen))\nforall x (Intended(x) -> Conglobe(x, effie))\nforall x (Distress(x, mervin) and Conglobe(mervin, pen) -> Conglobe(x, effie))\n\nQueenlike(margarita)\n\ntherefore Queenlike(margarita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The lisandra is unrelieved. The lisandra is unfrozen. The lisandra is dressy. The lisandra oyster the estel. The estel is conscious. The estel is dressy. The estel shlep the krishna. The estel oyster the lisandra. The estel oyster the krishna. The carole is unfrozen. The carole shlep the lisandra. The krishna agenize the lisandra. If something shlep the estel then it agenize the carole. If something agenize the lisandra and it shlep the krishna then the krishna is dressy. If the estel shlep the lisandra and the lisandra shlep the carole then the lisandra oyster the estel. If something oyster the carole then it agenize the lisandra. If something is conscious then it oyster the carole. If something shlep the krishna and the krishna oyster the lisandra then it oyster the carole. The estel does not visit the lisandra.", "logic": "\nUnrelieved(lisandra)\nUnfrozen(lisandra)\nDressy(lisandra)\nOyster(lisandra, estel)\nConscious(estel)\nDressy(estel)\nShlep(estel, krishna)\nOyster(estel, lisandra)\nOyster(estel, krishna)\nUnfrozen(carole)\nShlep(carole, lisandra)\nAgenize(krishna, lisandra)\nforall x (Shlep(x, estel) -> Agenize(x, carole))\nforall x (Agenize(x, lisandra) and Shlep(x, krishna) -> Dressy(krishna))\nShlep(estel, lisandra) and Shlep(lisandra, carole) -> Oyster(lisandra, estel)\nforall x (Oyster(x, carole) -> Agenize(x, lisandra))\nforall x (Conscious(x) -> Oyster(x, carole))\nforall x (Shlep(x, krishna) and Oyster(krishna, lisandra) -> Oyster(x, carole))\n\nnot Oyster(estel, lisandra)\n\ntherefore Oyster(estel, lisandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The guy is bats. The guy is deprived. The guy is embryotic. The guy extort the leoline. The leoline is tidy. The leoline is embryotic. The leoline recompense the cecelia. The leoline extort the guy. The leoline extort the cecelia. The lyndsey is deprived. The lyndsey recompense the guy. The cecelia noose the guy. If something recompense the leoline then it noose the lyndsey. If something noose the guy and it recompense the cecelia then the cecelia is embryotic. If the leoline recompense the guy and the guy recompense the lyndsey then the guy extort the leoline. If something extort the lyndsey then it noose the guy. If something is tidy then it extort the lyndsey. If something recompense the cecelia and the cecelia extort the guy then it extort the lyndsey. The leoline extort the lyndsey.", "logic": "\nBats(guy)\nDeprived(guy)\nEmbryotic(guy)\nExtort(guy, leoline)\nTidy(leoline)\nEmbryotic(leoline)\nRecompense(leoline, cecelia)\nExtort(leoline, guy)\nExtort(leoline, cecelia)\nDeprived(lyndsey)\nRecompense(lyndsey, guy)\nNoose(cecelia, guy)\nforall x (Recompense(x, leoline) -> Noose(x, lyndsey))\nforall x (Noose(x, guy) and Recompense(x, cecelia) -> Embryotic(cecelia))\nRecompense(leoline, guy) and Recompense(guy, lyndsey) -> Extort(guy, leoline)\nforall x (Extort(x, lyndsey) -> Noose(x, guy))\nforall x (Tidy(x) -> Extort(x, lyndsey))\nforall x (Recompense(x, cecelia) and Extort(cecelia, guy) -> Extort(x, lyndsey))\n\nExtort(leoline, lyndsey)\n\nTidy(leoline) and forall x (Tidy(x) -> Extort(x, lyndsey)) -> therefore Extort(leoline, lyndsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The marsiella is affinal. The marsiella is slovenian. The marsiella is unabridged. The marsiella profit the gwendolyn. The gwendolyn is saxicoline. The gwendolyn is unabridged. The gwendolyn splash the iago. The gwendolyn profit the marsiella. The gwendolyn profit the iago. The adriane is slovenian. The adriane splash the marsiella. The iago lambast the marsiella. If something splash the gwendolyn then it lambast the adriane. If something lambast the marsiella and it splash the iago then the iago is unabridged. If the gwendolyn splash the marsiella and the marsiella splash the adriane then the marsiella profit the gwendolyn. If something profit the adriane then it lambast the marsiella. If something is saxicoline then it profit the adriane. If something splash the iago and the iago profit the marsiella then it profit the adriane. The gwendolyn does not visit the adriane.", "logic": "\nAffinal(marsiella)\nSlovenian(marsiella)\nUnabridged(marsiella)\nProfit(marsiella, gwendolyn)\nSaxicoline(gwendolyn)\nUnabridged(gwendolyn)\nSplash(gwendolyn, iago)\nProfit(gwendolyn, marsiella)\nProfit(gwendolyn, iago)\nSlovenian(adriane)\nSplash(adriane, marsiella)\nLambast(iago, marsiella)\nforall x (Splash(x, gwendolyn) -> Lambast(x, adriane))\nforall x (Lambast(x, marsiella) and Splash(x, iago) -> Unabridged(iago))\nSplash(gwendolyn, marsiella) and Splash(marsiella, adriane) -> Profit(marsiella, gwendolyn)\nforall x (Profit(x, adriane) -> Lambast(x, marsiella))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Profit(x, adriane))\nforall x (Splash(x, iago) and Profit(iago, marsiella) -> Profit(x, adriane))\n\nnot Profit(gwendolyn, adriane)\n\nSaxicoline(gwendolyn) and forall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Profit(x, adriane)) -> therefore Profit(gwendolyn, adriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The lloyd is phrasal. The lloyd is breeched. The lloyd is churlish. The lloyd deride the nadia. The nadia is blanketed. The nadia is churlish. The nadia laminate the lonnie. The nadia deride the lloyd. The nadia deride the lonnie. The genevieve is breeched. The genevieve laminate the lloyd. The lonnie relocate the lloyd. If something laminate the nadia then it relocate the genevieve. If something relocate the lloyd and it laminate the lonnie then the lonnie is churlish. If the nadia laminate the lloyd and the lloyd laminate the genevieve then the lloyd deride the nadia. If something deride the genevieve then it relocate the lloyd. If something is blanketed then it deride the genevieve. If something laminate the lonnie and the lonnie deride the lloyd then it deride the genevieve. The nadia relocate the lloyd.", "logic": "\nPhrasal(lloyd)\nBreeched(lloyd)\nChurlish(lloyd)\nDeride(lloyd, nadia)\nBlanketed(nadia)\nChurlish(nadia)\nLaminate(nadia, lonnie)\nDeride(nadia, lloyd)\nDeride(nadia, lonnie)\nBreeched(genevieve)\nLaminate(genevieve, lloyd)\nRelocate(lonnie, lloyd)\nforall x (Laminate(x, nadia) -> Relocate(x, genevieve))\nforall x (Relocate(x, lloyd) and Laminate(x, lonnie) -> Churlish(lonnie))\nLaminate(nadia, lloyd) and Laminate(lloyd, genevieve) -> Deride(lloyd, nadia)\nforall x (Deride(x, genevieve) -> Relocate(x, lloyd))\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> Deride(x, genevieve))\nforall x (Laminate(x, lonnie) and Deride(lonnie, lloyd) -> Deride(x, genevieve))\n\nRelocate(nadia, lloyd)\n\nBlanketed(nadia) and forall x (Blanketed(x) -> Deride(x, genevieve)) -> therefore Deride(nadia, genevieve) Deride(nadia, genevieve) and forall x (Deride(x, genevieve) -> Relocate(x, lloyd)) -> therefore Relocate(nadia, lloyd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The shurwood is asinine. The shurwood is sextuple. The shurwood is inelastic. The shurwood jeopardise the annalisa. The annalisa is chechen. The annalisa is inelastic. The annalisa perish the melesa. The annalisa jeopardise the shurwood. The annalisa jeopardise the melesa. The dian is sextuple. The dian perish the shurwood. The melesa shag the shurwood. If something perish the annalisa then it shag the dian. If something shag the shurwood and it perish the melesa then the melesa is inelastic. If the annalisa perish the shurwood and the shurwood perish the dian then the shurwood jeopardise the annalisa. If something jeopardise the dian then it shag the shurwood. If something is chechen then it jeopardise the dian. If something perish the melesa and the melesa jeopardise the shurwood then it jeopardise the dian. The annalisa does not see the shurwood.", "logic": "\nAsinine(shurwood)\nSextuple(shurwood)\nInelastic(shurwood)\nJeopardise(shurwood, annalisa)\nChechen(annalisa)\nInelastic(annalisa)\nPerish(annalisa, melesa)\nJeopardise(annalisa, shurwood)\nJeopardise(annalisa, melesa)\nSextuple(dian)\nPerish(dian, shurwood)\nShag(melesa, shurwood)\nforall x (Perish(x, annalisa) -> Shag(x, dian))\nforall x (Shag(x, shurwood) and Perish(x, melesa) -> Inelastic(melesa))\nPerish(annalisa, shurwood) and Perish(shurwood, dian) -> Jeopardise(shurwood, annalisa)\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, dian) -> Shag(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Jeopardise(x, dian))\nforall x (Perish(x, melesa) and Jeopardise(melesa, shurwood) -> Jeopardise(x, dian))\n\nnot Shag(annalisa, shurwood)\n\nChechen(annalisa) and forall x (Chechen(x) -> Jeopardise(x, dian)) -> therefore Jeopardise(annalisa, dian) Jeopardise(annalisa, dian) and forall x (Jeopardise(x, dian) -> Shag(x, shurwood)) -> therefore Shag(annalisa, shurwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The pippy is sloughy. The pippy is ignoble. The pippy is sickish. The pippy debunk the vilhelm. The vilhelm is astonished. The vilhelm is sickish. The vilhelm swosh the richie. The vilhelm debunk the pippy. The vilhelm debunk the richie. The brewster is ignoble. The brewster swosh the pippy. The richie illuminate the pippy. If something swosh the vilhelm then it illuminate the brewster. If something illuminate the pippy and it swosh the richie then the richie is sickish. If the vilhelm swosh the pippy and the pippy swosh the brewster then the pippy debunk the vilhelm. If something debunk the brewster then it illuminate the pippy. If something is astonished then it debunk the brewster. If something swosh the richie and the richie debunk the pippy then it debunk the brewster. The richie is sickish.", "logic": "\nSloughy(pippy)\nIgnoble(pippy)\nSickish(pippy)\nDebunk(pippy, vilhelm)\nAstonished(vilhelm)\nSickish(vilhelm)\nSwosh(vilhelm, richie)\nDebunk(vilhelm, pippy)\nDebunk(vilhelm, richie)\nIgnoble(brewster)\nSwosh(brewster, pippy)\nIlluminate(richie, pippy)\nforall x (Swosh(x, vilhelm) -> Illuminate(x, brewster))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, pippy) and Swosh(x, richie) -> Sickish(richie))\nSwosh(vilhelm, pippy) and Swosh(pippy, brewster) -> Debunk(pippy, vilhelm)\nforall x (Debunk(x, brewster) -> Illuminate(x, pippy))\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> Debunk(x, brewster))\nforall x (Swosh(x, richie) and Debunk(richie, pippy) -> Debunk(x, brewster))\n\nSickish(richie)\n\nAstonished(vilhelm) and forall x (Astonished(x) -> Debunk(x, brewster)) -> therefore Debunk(vilhelm, brewster) Debunk(vilhelm, brewster) and forall x (Debunk(x, brewster) -> Illuminate(x, pippy)) -> therefore Illuminate(vilhelm, pippy) Illuminate(vilhelm, pippy) and Swosh(vilhelm, richie) and forall x (Illuminate(x, pippy) and Swosh(x, richie) -> Sickish(richie)) -> therefore Sickish(richie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The saul is exothermic. The saul is scatty. The saul is uncombed. The saul circulate the gabi. The gabi is sneering. The gabi is uncombed. The gabi denote the ruthanne. The gabi circulate the saul. The gabi circulate the ruthanne. The merill is scatty. The merill denote the saul. The ruthanne gush the saul. If something denote the gabi then it gush the merill. If something gush the saul and it denote the ruthanne then the ruthanne is uncombed. If the gabi denote the saul and the saul denote the merill then the saul circulate the gabi. If something circulate the merill then it gush the saul. If something is sneering then it circulate the merill. If something denote the ruthanne and the ruthanne circulate the saul then it circulate the merill. The ruthanne is not uncombed.", "logic": "\nExothermic(saul)\nScatty(saul)\nUncombed(saul)\nCirculate(saul, gabi)\nSneering(gabi)\nUncombed(gabi)\nDenote(gabi, ruthanne)\nCirculate(gabi, saul)\nCirculate(gabi, ruthanne)\nScatty(merill)\nDenote(merill, saul)\nGush(ruthanne, saul)\nforall x (Denote(x, gabi) -> Gush(x, merill))\nforall x (Gush(x, saul) and Denote(x, ruthanne) -> Uncombed(ruthanne))\nDenote(gabi, saul) and Denote(saul, merill) -> Circulate(saul, gabi)\nforall x (Circulate(x, merill) -> Gush(x, saul))\nforall x (Sneering(x) -> Circulate(x, merill))\nforall x (Denote(x, ruthanne) and Circulate(ruthanne, saul) -> Circulate(x, merill))\n\nnot Uncombed(ruthanne)\n\nSneering(gabi) and forall x (Sneering(x) -> Circulate(x, merill)) -> therefore Circulate(gabi, merill) Circulate(gabi, merill) and forall x (Circulate(x, merill) -> Gush(x, saul)) -> therefore Gush(gabi, saul) Gush(gabi, saul) and Denote(gabi, ruthanne) and forall x (Gush(x, saul) and Denote(x, ruthanne) -> Uncombed(ruthanne)) -> therefore Uncombed(ruthanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The camille is adrift. The camille is verbalised. The camille is itinerant. The camille subside the agnes. The agnes is lateen. The agnes is itinerant. The agnes lysogenize the kayle. The agnes subside the camille. The agnes subside the kayle. The siouxie is verbalised. The siouxie lysogenize the camille. The kayle avoid the camille. If something lysogenize the agnes then it avoid the siouxie. If something avoid the camille and it lysogenize the kayle then the kayle is itinerant. If the agnes lysogenize the camille and the camille lysogenize the siouxie then the camille subside the agnes. If something subside the siouxie then it avoid the camille. If something is lateen then it subside the siouxie. If something lysogenize the kayle and the kayle subside the camille then it subside the siouxie. The siouxie does not see the camille.", "logic": "\nAdrift(camille)\nVerbalised(camille)\nItinerant(camille)\nSubside(camille, agnes)\nLateen(agnes)\nItinerant(agnes)\nLysogenize(agnes, kayle)\nSubside(agnes, camille)\nSubside(agnes, kayle)\nVerbalised(siouxie)\nLysogenize(siouxie, camille)\nAvoid(kayle, camille)\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, agnes) -> Avoid(x, siouxie))\nforall x (Avoid(x, camille) and Lysogenize(x, kayle) -> Itinerant(kayle))\nLysogenize(agnes, camille) and Lysogenize(camille, siouxie) -> Subside(camille, agnes)\nforall x (Subside(x, siouxie) -> Avoid(x, camille))\nforall x (Lateen(x) -> Subside(x, siouxie))\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, kayle) and Subside(kayle, camille) -> Subside(x, siouxie))\n\nnot Avoid(siouxie, camille)\n\nforall x (Subside(x, siouxie) -> Avoid(x, camille)) <- forall x (Lateen(x) -> Subside(x, siouxie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The augie is allied. The augie is prescribed. The augie is uncoerced. The augie skulk the carree. The carree is ruled. The carree is uncoerced. The carree swing the griffith. The carree skulk the augie. The carree skulk the griffith. The katti is prescribed. The katti swing the augie. The griffith bombard the augie. If something swing the carree then it bombard the katti. If something bombard the augie and it swing the griffith then the griffith is uncoerced. If the carree swing the augie and the augie swing the katti then the augie skulk the carree. If something skulk the katti then it bombard the augie. If something is ruled then it skulk the katti. If something swing the griffith and the griffith skulk the augie then it skulk the katti. The augie bombard the katti.", "logic": "\nAllied(augie)\nPrescribed(augie)\nUncoerced(augie)\nSkulk(augie, carree)\nRuled(carree)\nUncoerced(carree)\nSwing(carree, griffith)\nSkulk(carree, augie)\nSkulk(carree, griffith)\nPrescribed(katti)\nSwing(katti, augie)\nBombard(griffith, augie)\nforall x (Swing(x, carree) -> Bombard(x, katti))\nforall x (Bombard(x, augie) and Swing(x, griffith) -> Uncoerced(griffith))\nSwing(carree, augie) and Swing(augie, katti) -> Skulk(augie, carree)\nforall x (Skulk(x, katti) -> Bombard(x, augie))\nforall x (Ruled(x) -> Skulk(x, katti))\nforall x (Swing(x, griffith) and Skulk(griffith, augie) -> Skulk(x, katti))\n\nBombard(augie, katti)\n\nforall x (Swing(x, carree) -> Bombard(x, katti)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The cissy is normal. The cissy is immortal. The cissy is alimentary. The cissy cooper the rudy. The rudy is nocturnal. The rudy is alimentary. The rudy outsmart the nike. The rudy cooper the cissy. The rudy cooper the nike. The olaf is immortal. The olaf outsmart the cissy. The nike shoulder the cissy. If something outsmart the rudy then it shoulder the olaf. If something shoulder the cissy and it outsmart the nike then the nike is alimentary. If the rudy outsmart the cissy and the cissy outsmart the olaf then the cissy cooper the rudy. If something cooper the olaf then it shoulder the cissy. If something is nocturnal then it cooper the olaf. If something outsmart the nike and the nike cooper the cissy then it cooper the olaf. The nike does not visit the olaf.", "logic": "\nNormal(cissy)\nImmortal(cissy)\nAlimentary(cissy)\nCooper(cissy, rudy)\nNocturnal(rudy)\nAlimentary(rudy)\nOutsmart(rudy, nike)\nCooper(rudy, cissy)\nCooper(rudy, nike)\nImmortal(olaf)\nOutsmart(olaf, cissy)\nShoulder(nike, cissy)\nforall x (Outsmart(x, rudy) -> Shoulder(x, olaf))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, cissy) and Outsmart(x, nike) -> Alimentary(nike))\nOutsmart(rudy, cissy) and Outsmart(cissy, olaf) -> Cooper(cissy, rudy)\nforall x (Cooper(x, olaf) -> Shoulder(x, cissy))\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) -> Cooper(x, olaf))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, nike) and Cooper(nike, cissy) -> Cooper(x, olaf))\n\nnot Cooper(nike, olaf)\n\nforall x (Nocturnal(x) -> Cooper(x, olaf)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The bonnie is darkish. The bonnie is cockamamie. The bonnie is apodictic. The bonnie verse the hamlin. The hamlin is lamenting. The hamlin is apodictic. The hamlin conceive the darla. The hamlin verse the bonnie. The hamlin verse the darla. The dorisa is cockamamie. The dorisa conceive the bonnie. The darla regain the bonnie. If something conceive the hamlin then it regain the dorisa. If something regain the bonnie and it conceive the darla then the darla is apodictic. If the hamlin conceive the bonnie and the bonnie conceive the dorisa then the bonnie verse the hamlin. If something verse the dorisa then it regain the bonnie. If something is lamenting then it verse the dorisa. If something conceive the darla and the darla verse the bonnie then it verse the dorisa. The dorisa regain the dorisa.", "logic": "\nDarkish(bonnie)\nCockamamie(bonnie)\nApodictic(bonnie)\nVerse(bonnie, hamlin)\nLamenting(hamlin)\nApodictic(hamlin)\nConceive(hamlin, darla)\nVerse(hamlin, bonnie)\nVerse(hamlin, darla)\nCockamamie(dorisa)\nConceive(dorisa, bonnie)\nRegain(darla, bonnie)\nforall x (Conceive(x, hamlin) -> Regain(x, dorisa))\nforall x (Regain(x, bonnie) and Conceive(x, darla) -> Apodictic(darla))\nConceive(hamlin, bonnie) and Conceive(bonnie, dorisa) -> Verse(bonnie, hamlin)\nforall x (Verse(x, dorisa) -> Regain(x, bonnie))\nforall x (Lamenting(x) -> Verse(x, dorisa))\nforall x (Conceive(x, darla) and Verse(darla, bonnie) -> Verse(x, dorisa))\n\nRegain(dorisa, dorisa)\n\nforall x (Conceive(x, hamlin) -> Regain(x, dorisa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The aridatha is demoniac. The aridatha is stalemated. The aridatha is dioestrual. The aridatha scrunch the mathilda. The mathilda is sisyphean. The mathilda is dioestrual. The mathilda serenade the colette. The mathilda scrunch the aridatha. The mathilda scrunch the colette. The henrietta is stalemated. The henrietta serenade the aridatha. The colette psalm the aridatha. If something serenade the mathilda then it psalm the henrietta. If something psalm the aridatha and it serenade the colette then the colette is dioestrual. If the mathilda serenade the aridatha and the aridatha serenade the henrietta then the aridatha scrunch the mathilda. If something scrunch the henrietta then it psalm the aridatha. If something is sisyphean then it scrunch the henrietta. If something serenade the colette and the colette scrunch the aridatha then it scrunch the henrietta. The colette is not nice.", "logic": "\nDemoniac(aridatha)\nStalemated(aridatha)\nDioestrual(aridatha)\nScrunch(aridatha, mathilda)\nSisyphean(mathilda)\nDioestrual(mathilda)\nSerenade(mathilda, colette)\nScrunch(mathilda, aridatha)\nScrunch(mathilda, colette)\nStalemated(henrietta)\nSerenade(henrietta, aridatha)\nPsalm(colette, aridatha)\nforall x (Serenade(x, mathilda) -> Psalm(x, henrietta))\nforall x (Psalm(x, aridatha) and Serenade(x, colette) -> Dioestrual(colette))\nSerenade(mathilda, aridatha) and Serenade(aridatha, henrietta) -> Scrunch(aridatha, mathilda)\nforall x (Scrunch(x, henrietta) -> Psalm(x, aridatha))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Scrunch(x, henrietta))\nforall x (Serenade(x, colette) and Scrunch(colette, aridatha) -> Scrunch(x, henrietta))\n\nnot Nice(colette)\n\nnot Nice(colette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The caroljean is hooked. The caroljean is ceruminous. The caroljean is bivalve. The caroljean undertake the emma. The emma is scrimpy. The emma is bivalve. The emma click the sisely. The emma undertake the caroljean. The emma undertake the sisely. The chauncey is ceruminous. The chauncey click the caroljean. The sisely deject the caroljean. If something click the emma then it deject the chauncey. If something deject the caroljean and it click the sisely then the sisely is bivalve. If the emma click the caroljean and the caroljean click the chauncey then the caroljean undertake the emma. If something undertake the chauncey then it deject the caroljean. If something is scrimpy then it undertake the chauncey. If something click the sisely and the sisely undertake the caroljean then it undertake the chauncey. The caroljean click the emma.", "logic": "\nHooked(caroljean)\nCeruminous(caroljean)\nBivalve(caroljean)\nUndertake(caroljean, emma)\nScrimpy(emma)\nBivalve(emma)\nClick(emma, sisely)\nUndertake(emma, caroljean)\nUndertake(emma, sisely)\nCeruminous(chauncey)\nClick(chauncey, caroljean)\nDeject(sisely, caroljean)\nforall x (Click(x, emma) -> Deject(x, chauncey))\nforall x (Deject(x, caroljean) and Click(x, sisely) -> Bivalve(sisely))\nClick(emma, caroljean) and Click(caroljean, chauncey) -> Undertake(caroljean, emma)\nforall x (Undertake(x, chauncey) -> Deject(x, caroljean))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) -> Undertake(x, chauncey))\nforall x (Click(x, sisely) and Undertake(sisely, caroljean) -> Undertake(x, chauncey))\n\nClick(caroljean, emma)\n\nClick(caroljean, emma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The cybill is torrid. The cybill is flyaway. The cybill is unbound. The cybill intern the raj. The raj is accepting. The raj is unbound. The raj oyster the arlette. The raj intern the cybill. The raj intern the arlette. The conny is flyaway. The conny oyster the cybill. The arlette shamanize the cybill. If something oyster the raj then it shamanize the conny. If something shamanize the cybill and it oyster the arlette then the arlette is unbound. If the raj oyster the cybill and the cybill oyster the conny then the cybill intern the raj. If something intern the conny then it shamanize the cybill. If something is accepting then it intern the conny. If something oyster the arlette and the arlette intern the cybill then it intern the conny. The cybill does not need the cybill.", "logic": "\nTorrid(cybill)\nFlyaway(cybill)\nUnbound(cybill)\nIntern(cybill, raj)\nAccepting(raj)\nUnbound(raj)\nOyster(raj, arlette)\nIntern(raj, cybill)\nIntern(raj, arlette)\nFlyaway(conny)\nOyster(conny, cybill)\nShamanize(arlette, cybill)\nforall x (Oyster(x, raj) -> Shamanize(x, conny))\nforall x (Shamanize(x, cybill) and Oyster(x, arlette) -> Unbound(arlette))\nOyster(raj, cybill) and Oyster(cybill, conny) -> Intern(cybill, raj)\nforall x (Intern(x, conny) -> Shamanize(x, cybill))\nforall x (Accepting(x) -> Intern(x, conny))\nforall x (Oyster(x, arlette) and Intern(arlette, cybill) -> Intern(x, conny))\n\nnot Oyster(cybill, cybill)\n\nnot Oyster(cybill, cybill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "The eleanore is gimcrack. The eleanore is unadjusted. The eleanore is mortgaged. The eleanore opsonize the fenelia. The fenelia is anuric. The fenelia is mortgaged. The fenelia memorise the sigrid. The fenelia opsonize the eleanore. The fenelia opsonize the sigrid. The muffin is unadjusted. The muffin memorise the eleanore. The sigrid preexist the eleanore. If something memorise the fenelia then it preexist the muffin. If something preexist the eleanore and it memorise the sigrid then the sigrid is mortgaged. If the fenelia memorise the eleanore and the eleanore memorise the muffin then the eleanore opsonize the fenelia. If something opsonize the muffin then it preexist the eleanore. If something is anuric then it opsonize the muffin. If something memorise the sigrid and the sigrid opsonize the eleanore then it opsonize the muffin. The sigrid is anuric.", "logic": "\nGimcrack(eleanore)\nUnadjusted(eleanore)\nMortgaged(eleanore)\nOpsonize(eleanore, fenelia)\nAnuric(fenelia)\nMortgaged(fenelia)\nMemorise(fenelia, sigrid)\nOpsonize(fenelia, eleanore)\nOpsonize(fenelia, sigrid)\nUnadjusted(muffin)\nMemorise(muffin, eleanore)\nPreexist(sigrid, eleanore)\nforall x (Memorise(x, fenelia) -> Preexist(x, muffin))\nforall x (Preexist(x, eleanore) and Memorise(x, sigrid) -> Mortgaged(sigrid))\nMemorise(fenelia, eleanore) and Memorise(eleanore, muffin) -> Opsonize(eleanore, fenelia)\nforall x (Opsonize(x, muffin) -> Preexist(x, eleanore))\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Opsonize(x, muffin))\nforall x (Memorise(x, sigrid) and Opsonize(sigrid, eleanore) -> Opsonize(x, muffin))\n\nAnuric(sigrid)\n\nAnuric(sigrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-791"} {"premises": "Katherine is frequent. Katherine is scriptural. Katherine is not katabatic. Katherine is not slivery. Katherine is overstrung. Katherine is outrageous. Judi is bauxitic. Judi is scriptural. Judi is slivery. Judi is overstrung. Wait is bauxitic. Wait is not frequent. Wait is not scriptural. Wait is slivery. Wait is overstrung. Red people are katabatic. Katherine is not slivery.", "logic": "\nFrequent(katherine)\nScriptural(katherine)\nnot Katabatic(katherine)\nnot Slivery(katherine)\nOverstrung(katherine)\nOutrageous(katherine)\nBauxitic(judi)\nScriptural(judi)\nSlivery(judi)\nOverstrung(judi)\nBauxitic(wait)\nnot Frequent(wait)\nnot Scriptural(wait)\nSlivery(wait)\nOverstrung(wait)\nforall x (Slivery(x) -> Katabatic(x))\n\nnot Slivery(katherine)\n\ntherefore not Slivery(katherine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Bayard is eased. Bayard is uncrowded. Bayard is not fitted. Bayard is not homely. Bayard is trepid. Bayard is paired. Chadd is perversive. Chadd is uncrowded. Chadd is homely. Chadd is trepid. Reuben is perversive. Reuben is not eased. Reuben is not uncrowded. Reuben is homely. Reuben is trepid. Red people are fitted. Reuben is not trepid.", "logic": "\nEased(bayard)\nUncrowded(bayard)\nnot Fitted(bayard)\nnot Homely(bayard)\nTrepid(bayard)\nPaired(bayard)\nPerversive(chadd)\nUncrowded(chadd)\nHomely(chadd)\nTrepid(chadd)\nPerversive(reuben)\nnot Eased(reuben)\nnot Uncrowded(reuben)\nHomely(reuben)\nTrepid(reuben)\nforall x (Homely(x) -> Fitted(x))\n\nnot Trepid(reuben)\n\ntherefore Trepid(reuben)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Peri is locomotive. Peri is stooped. Peri is not rotund. Peri is not taxing. Peri is unaerated. Peri is resolvable. Ameline is impulsive. Ameline is stooped. Ameline is taxing. Ameline is unaerated. Halie is impulsive. Halie is not locomotive. Halie is not stooped. Halie is taxing. Halie is unaerated. Red people are rotund. Halie is rotund.", "logic": "\nLocomotive(peri)\nStooped(peri)\nnot Rotund(peri)\nnot Taxing(peri)\nUnaerated(peri)\nResolvable(peri)\nImpulsive(ameline)\nStooped(ameline)\nTaxing(ameline)\nUnaerated(ameline)\nImpulsive(halie)\nnot Locomotive(halie)\nnot Stooped(halie)\nTaxing(halie)\nUnaerated(halie)\nforall x (Taxing(x) -> Rotund(x))\n\nRotund(halie)\n\nTaxing(halie) and forall x (Taxing(x) -> Rotund(x)) -> therefore Rotund(halie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Mella is wakeful. Mella is other. Mella is not pugnacious. Mella is not ropy. Mella is lucifugous. Mella is chockful. Waylen is ferial. Waylen is other. Waylen is ropy. Waylen is lucifugous. Susette is ferial. Susette is not wakeful. Susette is not other. Susette is ropy. Susette is lucifugous. Red people are pugnacious. Waylen is not pugnacious.", "logic": "\nWakeful(mella)\nOther(mella)\nnot Pugnacious(mella)\nnot Ropy(mella)\nLucifugous(mella)\nChockful(mella)\nFerial(waylen)\nOther(waylen)\nRopy(waylen)\nLucifugous(waylen)\nFerial(susette)\nnot Wakeful(susette)\nnot Other(susette)\nRopy(susette)\nLucifugous(susette)\nforall x (Ropy(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\n\nnot Pugnacious(waylen)\n\nRopy(waylen) and forall x (Ropy(x) -> Pugnacious(x)) -> therefore Pugnacious(waylen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Roderich is speckled. Roderich is commensal. Roderich is not unfunny. Roderich is not chintzy. Roderich is daredevil. Roderich is animating. Ricard is hospitable. Ricard is commensal. Ricard is chintzy. Ricard is daredevil. Yard is hospitable. Yard is not speckled. Yard is not commensal. Yard is chintzy. Yard is daredevil. Red people are unfunny. Yard is not animating.", "logic": "\nSpeckled(roderich)\nCommensal(roderich)\nnot Unfunny(roderich)\nnot Chintzy(roderich)\nDaredevil(roderich)\nAnimating(roderich)\nHospitable(ricard)\nCommensal(ricard)\nChintzy(ricard)\nDaredevil(ricard)\nHospitable(yard)\nnot Speckled(yard)\nnot Commensal(yard)\nChintzy(yard)\nDaredevil(yard)\nforall x (Chintzy(x) -> Unfunny(x))\n\nnot Animating(yard)\n\nnot Animating(yard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Sindee is crowded. Sindee is incurvate. Sindee is not reflexed. Sindee is not unbooked. Sindee is unmanly. Sindee is anecdotal. Selina is unoriginal. Selina is incurvate. Selina is unbooked. Selina is unmanly. Dennis is unoriginal. Dennis is not crowded. Dennis is not incurvate. Dennis is unbooked. Dennis is unmanly. Red people are reflexed. Sindee is unoriginal.", "logic": "\nCrowded(sindee)\nIncurvate(sindee)\nnot Reflexed(sindee)\nnot Unbooked(sindee)\nUnmanly(sindee)\nAnecdotal(sindee)\nUnoriginal(selina)\nIncurvate(selina)\nUnbooked(selina)\nUnmanly(selina)\nUnoriginal(dennis)\nnot Crowded(dennis)\nnot Incurvate(dennis)\nUnbooked(dennis)\nUnmanly(dennis)\nforall x (Unbooked(x) -> Reflexed(x))\n\nUnoriginal(sindee)\n\nUnoriginal(sindee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Vassily is bicornuous. Vassily is rallying. Vassily is not bibulous. Vassily is not padded. Vassily is milky. Vassily is dripless. Christos is flavourful. Christos is rallying. Christos is padded. Christos is milky. Emeline is flavourful. Emeline is not bicornuous. Emeline is not rallying. Emeline is padded. Emeline is milky. Red people are bibulous. Christos is not dripless.", "logic": "\nBicornuous(vassily)\nRallying(vassily)\nnot Bibulous(vassily)\nnot Padded(vassily)\nMilky(vassily)\nDripless(vassily)\nFlavourful(christos)\nRallying(christos)\nPadded(christos)\nMilky(christos)\nFlavourful(emeline)\nnot Bicornuous(emeline)\nnot Rallying(emeline)\nPadded(emeline)\nMilky(emeline)\nforall x (Padded(x) -> Bibulous(x))\n\nnot Dripless(christos)\n\nnot Dripless(christos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Davon is judgmental. Davon is awheel. Davon is not overseas. Davon is not star. Davon is callable. Davon is tenured. Joellen is alienated. Joellen is awheel. Joellen is star. Joellen is callable. Johan is alienated. Johan is not judgmental. Johan is not awheel. Johan is star. Johan is callable. Red people are overseas. Joellen is judgmental.", "logic": "\nJudgmental(davon)\nAwheel(davon)\nnot Overseas(davon)\nnot Star(davon)\nCallable(davon)\nTenured(davon)\nAlienated(joellen)\nAwheel(joellen)\nStar(joellen)\nCallable(joellen)\nAlienated(johan)\nnot Judgmental(johan)\nnot Awheel(johan)\nStar(johan)\nCallable(johan)\nforall x (Star(x) -> Overseas(x))\n\nJudgmental(joellen)\n\nJudgmental(joellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2932"} {"premises": "Bell is mislaid. Bell is accusing. Bell is unobvious. Bell is ataxic. Bell is complex. Bell is epileptic. Bell is desiccate. All desiccate, epileptic things are complex. Smart things are unobvious. Red, desiccate things are mislaid. Bell is mislaid.", "logic": "\nMislaid(bell)\nAccusing(bell)\nUnobvious(bell)\nAtaxic(bell)\nComplex(bell)\nEpileptic(bell)\nDesiccate(bell)\nforall x (Desiccate(x) and Epileptic(x) -> Complex(x))\nforall x (Complex(x) -> Unobvious(x))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) and Desiccate(x) -> Mislaid(x))\n\nMislaid(bell)\n\ntherefore Mislaid(bell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-325"} {"premises": "Jaquelin is monochrome. Jaquelin is newsless. Jaquelin is lively. Jaquelin is clastic. Jaquelin is missional. Jaquelin is sinkable. Jaquelin is lexical. All lexical, sinkable things are missional. Smart things are lively. Red, lexical things are monochrome. Jaquelin is not sinkable.", "logic": "\nMonochrome(jaquelin)\nNewsless(jaquelin)\nLively(jaquelin)\nClastic(jaquelin)\nMissional(jaquelin)\nSinkable(jaquelin)\nLexical(jaquelin)\nforall x (Lexical(x) and Sinkable(x) -> Missional(x))\nforall x (Missional(x) -> Lively(x))\nforall x (Clastic(x) and Lexical(x) -> Monochrome(x))\n\nnot Sinkable(jaquelin)\n\ntherefore Sinkable(jaquelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-325"} {"premises": "The emilie is pronominal. The johnna bombproof the emilie. The mavis bombproof the emilie. If something bombproof the emilie then it bombproof the johnna. If something journey the mavis then the mavis is bibbed. If something bombproof the mavis and the mavis is pronominal then the mavis bombproof the johnna. If the johnna bombproof the mavis then the johnna is endermic. If something bombproof the johnna then it bombproof the mavis. If the johnna bombproof the emilie and the emilie is pronominal then the emilie is sicilian. If the johnna journey the emilie then the johnna bombproof the mavis. If something is pronominal and it journey the emilie then it overlook the mavis. The emilie is pronominal.", "logic": "\nPronominal(emilie)\nBombproof(johnna, emilie)\nBombproof(mavis, emilie)\nforall x (Bombproof(x, emilie) -> Bombproof(x, johnna))\nforall x (Journey(x, mavis) -> Bibbed(mavis))\nforall x (Bombproof(x, mavis) and Pronominal(mavis) -> Bombproof(mavis, johnna))\nBombproof(johnna, mavis) -> Endermic(johnna)\nforall x (Bombproof(x, johnna) -> Bombproof(x, mavis))\nBombproof(johnna, emilie) and Pronominal(emilie) -> Sicilian(emilie)\nJourney(johnna, emilie) -> Bombproof(johnna, mavis)\nforall x (Pronominal(x) and Journey(x, emilie) -> Overlook(x, mavis))\n\nPronominal(emilie)\n\ntherefore Pronominal(emilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The harvey is reluctant. The vanya finish the harvey. The lilas finish the harvey. If something finish the harvey then it finish the vanya. If something desex the lilas then the lilas is impotent. If something finish the lilas and the lilas is reluctant then the lilas finish the vanya. If the vanya finish the lilas then the vanya is anaclitic. If something finish the vanya then it finish the lilas. If the vanya finish the harvey and the harvey is reluctant then the harvey is egocentric. If the vanya desex the harvey then the vanya finish the lilas. If something is reluctant and it desex the harvey then it grave the lilas. The vanya does not need the harvey.", "logic": "\nReluctant(harvey)\nFinish(vanya, harvey)\nFinish(lilas, harvey)\nforall x (Finish(x, harvey) -> Finish(x, vanya))\nforall x (Desex(x, lilas) -> Impotent(lilas))\nforall x (Finish(x, lilas) and Reluctant(lilas) -> Finish(lilas, vanya))\nFinish(vanya, lilas) -> Anaclitic(vanya)\nforall x (Finish(x, vanya) -> Finish(x, lilas))\nFinish(vanya, harvey) and Reluctant(harvey) -> Egocentric(harvey)\nDesex(vanya, harvey) -> Finish(vanya, lilas)\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and Desex(x, harvey) -> Grave(x, lilas))\n\nnot Finish(vanya, harvey)\n\ntherefore Finish(vanya, harvey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The carolee is contrasty. The grazia excogitate the carolee. The phip excogitate the carolee. If something excogitate the carolee then it excogitate the grazia. If something flare the phip then the phip is yellowish. If something excogitate the phip and the phip is contrasty then the phip excogitate the grazia. If the grazia excogitate the phip then the grazia is excitable. If something excogitate the grazia then it excogitate the phip. If the grazia excogitate the carolee and the carolee is contrasty then the carolee is repressive. If the grazia flare the carolee then the grazia excogitate the phip. If something is contrasty and it flare the carolee then it harken the phip. The carolee is repressive.", "logic": "\nContrasty(carolee)\nExcogitate(grazia, carolee)\nExcogitate(phip, carolee)\nforall x (Excogitate(x, carolee) -> Excogitate(x, grazia))\nforall x (Flare(x, phip) -> Yellowish(phip))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, phip) and Contrasty(phip) -> Excogitate(phip, grazia))\nExcogitate(grazia, phip) -> Excitable(grazia)\nforall x (Excogitate(x, grazia) -> Excogitate(x, phip))\nExcogitate(grazia, carolee) and Contrasty(carolee) -> Repressive(carolee)\nFlare(grazia, carolee) -> Excogitate(grazia, phip)\nforall x (Contrasty(x) and Flare(x, carolee) -> Harken(x, phip))\n\nRepressive(carolee)\n\nExcogitate(grazia, carolee) and Contrasty(carolee) and Excogitate(grazia, carolee) and Contrasty(carolee) -> Repressive(carolee) -> therefore Repressive(carolee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The diahann is shameful. The lizzy salute the diahann. The pace salute the diahann. If something salute the diahann then it salute the lizzy. If something sorcerise the pace then the pace is riming. If something salute the pace and the pace is shameful then the pace salute the lizzy. If the lizzy salute the pace then the lizzy is maritime. If something salute the lizzy then it salute the pace. If the lizzy salute the diahann and the diahann is shameful then the diahann is requested. If the lizzy sorcerise the diahann then the lizzy salute the pace. If something is shameful and it sorcerise the diahann then it okay the pace. The pace does not need the lizzy.", "logic": "\nShameful(diahann)\nSalute(lizzy, diahann)\nSalute(pace, diahann)\nforall x (Salute(x, diahann) -> Salute(x, lizzy))\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, pace) -> Riming(pace))\nforall x (Salute(x, pace) and Shameful(pace) -> Salute(pace, lizzy))\nSalute(lizzy, pace) -> Maritime(lizzy)\nforall x (Salute(x, lizzy) -> Salute(x, pace))\nSalute(lizzy, diahann) and Shameful(diahann) -> Requested(diahann)\nSorcerise(lizzy, diahann) -> Salute(lizzy, pace)\nforall x (Shameful(x) and Sorcerise(x, diahann) -> Okay(x, pace))\n\nnot Salute(pace, lizzy)\n\nSalute(pace, diahann) and forall x (Salute(x, diahann) -> Salute(x, lizzy)) -> therefore Salute(pace, lizzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The nevil is learned. The hilton tangle the nevil. The steve tangle the nevil. If something tangle the nevil then it tangle the hilton. If something applaud the steve then the steve is vicinal. If something tangle the steve and the steve is learned then the steve tangle the hilton. If the hilton tangle the steve then the hilton is dirty. If something tangle the hilton then it tangle the steve. If the hilton tangle the nevil and the nevil is learned then the nevil is nonmodern. If the hilton applaud the nevil then the hilton tangle the steve. If something is learned and it applaud the nevil then it scrabble the steve. The steve tangle the steve.", "logic": "\nLearned(nevil)\nTangle(hilton, nevil)\nTangle(steve, nevil)\nforall x (Tangle(x, nevil) -> Tangle(x, hilton))\nforall x (Applaud(x, steve) -> Vicinal(steve))\nforall x (Tangle(x, steve) and Learned(steve) -> Tangle(steve, hilton))\nTangle(hilton, steve) -> Dirty(hilton)\nforall x (Tangle(x, hilton) -> Tangle(x, steve))\nTangle(hilton, nevil) and Learned(nevil) -> Nonmodern(nevil)\nApplaud(hilton, nevil) -> Tangle(hilton, steve)\nforall x (Learned(x) and Applaud(x, nevil) -> Scrabble(x, steve))\n\nTangle(steve, steve)\n\nTangle(steve, nevil) and forall x (Tangle(x, nevil) -> Tangle(x, hilton)) -> therefore Tangle(steve, hilton) Tangle(steve, hilton) and forall x (Tangle(x, hilton) -> Tangle(x, steve)) -> therefore Tangle(steve, steve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The zared is capitular. The susette layer the zared. The peggy layer the zared. If something layer the zared then it layer the susette. If something facilitate the peggy then the peggy is praetorial. If something layer the peggy and the peggy is capitular then the peggy layer the susette. If the susette layer the peggy then the susette is stressed. If something layer the susette then it layer the peggy. If the susette layer the zared and the zared is capitular then the zared is vinaceous. If the susette facilitate the zared then the susette layer the peggy. If something is capitular and it facilitate the zared then it buttress the peggy. The susette does not need the peggy.", "logic": "\nCapitular(zared)\nLayer(susette, zared)\nLayer(peggy, zared)\nforall x (Layer(x, zared) -> Layer(x, susette))\nforall x (Facilitate(x, peggy) -> Praetorial(peggy))\nforall x (Layer(x, peggy) and Capitular(peggy) -> Layer(peggy, susette))\nLayer(susette, peggy) -> Stressed(susette)\nforall x (Layer(x, susette) -> Layer(x, peggy))\nLayer(susette, zared) and Capitular(zared) -> Vinaceous(zared)\nFacilitate(susette, zared) -> Layer(susette, peggy)\nforall x (Capitular(x) and Facilitate(x, zared) -> Buttress(x, peggy))\n\nnot Layer(susette, peggy)\n\nLayer(susette, zared) and forall x (Layer(x, zared) -> Layer(x, susette)) -> therefore Layer(susette, susette) Layer(susette, susette) and forall x (Layer(x, susette) -> Layer(x, peggy)) -> therefore Layer(susette, peggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The eliott is walleyed. The anneliese conflate the eliott. The joela conflate the eliott. If something conflate the eliott then it conflate the anneliese. If something scorch the joela then the joela is clockwise. If something conflate the joela and the joela is walleyed then the joela conflate the anneliese. If the anneliese conflate the joela then the anneliese is eight. If something conflate the anneliese then it conflate the joela. If the anneliese conflate the eliott and the eliott is walleyed then the eliott is quarterly. If the anneliese scorch the eliott then the anneliese conflate the joela. If something is walleyed and it scorch the eliott then it camphorate the joela. The anneliese is eight.", "logic": "\nWalleyed(eliott)\nConflate(anneliese, eliott)\nConflate(joela, eliott)\nforall x (Conflate(x, eliott) -> Conflate(x, anneliese))\nforall x (Scorch(x, joela) -> Clockwise(joela))\nforall x (Conflate(x, joela) and Walleyed(joela) -> Conflate(joela, anneliese))\nConflate(anneliese, joela) -> Eight(anneliese)\nforall x (Conflate(x, anneliese) -> Conflate(x, joela))\nConflate(anneliese, eliott) and Walleyed(eliott) -> Quarterly(eliott)\nScorch(anneliese, eliott) -> Conflate(anneliese, joela)\nforall x (Walleyed(x) and Scorch(x, eliott) -> Camphorate(x, joela))\n\nEight(anneliese)\n\nConflate(anneliese, eliott) and forall x (Conflate(x, eliott) -> Conflate(x, anneliese)) -> therefore Conflate(anneliese, anneliese) Conflate(anneliese, anneliese) and forall x (Conflate(x, anneliese) -> Conflate(x, joela)) -> therefore Conflate(anneliese, joela) Conflate(anneliese, joela) and Conflate(anneliese, joela) -> Eight(anneliese) -> therefore Eight(anneliese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The damon is ablative. The callida submarine the damon. The sheena submarine the damon. If something submarine the damon then it submarine the callida. If something skyrocket the sheena then the sheena is dextrorse. If something submarine the sheena and the sheena is ablative then the sheena submarine the callida. If the callida submarine the sheena then the callida is norwegian. If something submarine the callida then it submarine the sheena. If the callida submarine the damon and the damon is ablative then the damon is looseleaf. If the callida skyrocket the damon then the callida submarine the sheena. If something is ablative and it skyrocket the damon then it modernize the sheena. The callida is not norwegian.", "logic": "\nAblative(damon)\nSubmarine(callida, damon)\nSubmarine(sheena, damon)\nforall x (Submarine(x, damon) -> Submarine(x, callida))\nforall x (Skyrocket(x, sheena) -> Dextrorse(sheena))\nforall x (Submarine(x, sheena) and Ablative(sheena) -> Submarine(sheena, callida))\nSubmarine(callida, sheena) -> Norwegian(callida)\nforall x (Submarine(x, callida) -> Submarine(x, sheena))\nSubmarine(callida, damon) and Ablative(damon) -> Looseleaf(damon)\nSkyrocket(callida, damon) -> Submarine(callida, sheena)\nforall x (Ablative(x) and Skyrocket(x, damon) -> Modernize(x, sheena))\n\nnot Norwegian(callida)\n\nSubmarine(callida, damon) and forall x (Submarine(x, damon) -> Submarine(x, callida)) -> therefore Submarine(callida, callida) Submarine(callida, callida) and forall x (Submarine(x, callida) -> Submarine(x, sheena)) -> therefore Submarine(callida, sheena) Submarine(callida, sheena) and Submarine(callida, sheena) -> Norwegian(callida) -> therefore Norwegian(callida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The fulton is periodical. The iseabal interlock the fulton. The alena interlock the fulton. If something interlock the fulton then it interlock the iseabal. If something paralyze the alena then the alena is urceolate. If something interlock the alena and the alena is periodical then the alena interlock the iseabal. If the iseabal interlock the alena then the iseabal is dynastic. If something interlock the iseabal then it interlock the alena. If the iseabal interlock the fulton and the fulton is periodical then the fulton is empyreal. If the iseabal paralyze the fulton then the iseabal interlock the alena. If something is periodical and it paralyze the fulton then it elongate the alena. The fulton does not need the alena.", "logic": "\nPeriodical(fulton)\nInterlock(iseabal, fulton)\nInterlock(alena, fulton)\nforall x (Interlock(x, fulton) -> Interlock(x, iseabal))\nforall x (Paralyze(x, alena) -> Urceolate(alena))\nforall x (Interlock(x, alena) and Periodical(alena) -> Interlock(alena, iseabal))\nInterlock(iseabal, alena) -> Dynastic(iseabal)\nforall x (Interlock(x, iseabal) -> Interlock(x, alena))\nInterlock(iseabal, fulton) and Periodical(fulton) -> Empyreal(fulton)\nParalyze(iseabal, fulton) -> Interlock(iseabal, alena)\nforall x (Periodical(x) and Paralyze(x, fulton) -> Elongate(x, alena))\n\nnot Interlock(fulton, alena)\n\nforall x (Interlock(x, iseabal) -> Interlock(x, alena)) <- forall x (Interlock(x, fulton) -> Interlock(x, iseabal)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The cyrillus is careworn. The leeanne encounter the cyrillus. The andreas encounter the cyrillus. If something encounter the cyrillus then it encounter the leeanne. If something embitter the andreas then the andreas is worn. If something encounter the andreas and the andreas is careworn then the andreas encounter the leeanne. If the leeanne encounter the andreas then the leeanne is implanted. If something encounter the leeanne then it encounter the andreas. If the leeanne encounter the cyrillus and the cyrillus is careworn then the cyrillus is unvented. If the leeanne embitter the cyrillus then the leeanne encounter the andreas. If something is careworn and it embitter the cyrillus then it nickname the andreas. The cyrillus nickname the andreas.", "logic": "\nCareworn(cyrillus)\nEncounter(leeanne, cyrillus)\nEncounter(andreas, cyrillus)\nforall x (Encounter(x, cyrillus) -> Encounter(x, leeanne))\nforall x (Embitter(x, andreas) -> Worn(andreas))\nforall x (Encounter(x, andreas) and Careworn(andreas) -> Encounter(andreas, leeanne))\nEncounter(leeanne, andreas) -> Implanted(leeanne)\nforall x (Encounter(x, leeanne) -> Encounter(x, andreas))\nEncounter(leeanne, cyrillus) and Careworn(cyrillus) -> Unvented(cyrillus)\nEmbitter(leeanne, cyrillus) -> Encounter(leeanne, andreas)\nforall x (Careworn(x) and Embitter(x, cyrillus) -> Nickname(x, andreas))\n\nNickname(cyrillus, andreas)\n\nforall x (Careworn(x) and Embitter(x, cyrillus) -> Nickname(x, andreas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The kittie is numberless. The gus jackrabbit the kittie. The evaleen jackrabbit the kittie. If something jackrabbit the kittie then it jackrabbit the gus. If something shorten the evaleen then the evaleen is nordic. If something jackrabbit the evaleen and the evaleen is numberless then the evaleen jackrabbit the gus. If the gus jackrabbit the evaleen then the gus is ripened. If something jackrabbit the gus then it jackrabbit the evaleen. If the gus jackrabbit the kittie and the kittie is numberless then the kittie is acicular. If the gus shorten the kittie then the gus jackrabbit the evaleen. If something is numberless and it shorten the kittie then it resplend the evaleen. The gus does not like the evaleen.", "logic": "\nNumberless(kittie)\nJackrabbit(gus, kittie)\nJackrabbit(evaleen, kittie)\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, kittie) -> Jackrabbit(x, gus))\nforall x (Shorten(x, evaleen) -> Nordic(evaleen))\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, evaleen) and Numberless(evaleen) -> Jackrabbit(evaleen, gus))\nJackrabbit(gus, evaleen) -> Ripened(gus)\nforall x (Jackrabbit(x, gus) -> Jackrabbit(x, evaleen))\nJackrabbit(gus, kittie) and Numberless(kittie) -> Acicular(kittie)\nShorten(gus, kittie) -> Jackrabbit(gus, evaleen)\nforall x (Numberless(x) and Shorten(x, kittie) -> Resplend(x, evaleen))\n\nnot Resplend(gus, evaleen)\n\nforall x (Numberless(x) and Shorten(x, kittie) -> Resplend(x, evaleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The praneetf is secondhand. The nicoline omit the praneetf. The jolynn omit the praneetf. If something omit the praneetf then it omit the nicoline. If something hurt the jolynn then the jolynn is bouncing. If something omit the jolynn and the jolynn is secondhand then the jolynn omit the nicoline. If the nicoline omit the jolynn then the nicoline is parhelic. If something omit the nicoline then it omit the jolynn. If the nicoline omit the praneetf and the praneetf is secondhand then the praneetf is crustose. If the nicoline hurt the praneetf then the nicoline omit the jolynn. If something is secondhand and it hurt the praneetf then it brush the jolynn. The jolynn brush the jolynn.", "logic": "\nSecondhand(praneetf)\nOmit(nicoline, praneetf)\nOmit(jolynn, praneetf)\nforall x (Omit(x, praneetf) -> Omit(x, nicoline))\nforall x (Hurt(x, jolynn) -> Bouncing(jolynn))\nforall x (Omit(x, jolynn) and Secondhand(jolynn) -> Omit(jolynn, nicoline))\nOmit(nicoline, jolynn) -> Parhelic(nicoline)\nforall x (Omit(x, nicoline) -> Omit(x, jolynn))\nOmit(nicoline, praneetf) and Secondhand(praneetf) -> Crustose(praneetf)\nHurt(nicoline, praneetf) -> Omit(nicoline, jolynn)\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Hurt(x, praneetf) -> Brush(x, jolynn))\n\nBrush(jolynn, jolynn)\n\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Hurt(x, praneetf) -> Brush(x, jolynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The kendall is unhurt. The abelard dehumanise the kendall. The annabella dehumanise the kendall. If something dehumanise the kendall then it dehumanise the abelard. If something transgress the annabella then the annabella is victorian. If something dehumanise the annabella and the annabella is unhurt then the annabella dehumanise the abelard. If the abelard dehumanise the annabella then the abelard is unhumorous. If something dehumanise the abelard then it dehumanise the annabella. If the abelard dehumanise the kendall and the kendall is unhurt then the kendall is infective. If the abelard transgress the kendall then the abelard dehumanise the annabella. If something is unhurt and it transgress the kendall then it rewire the annabella. The abelard does not chase the annabella.", "logic": "\nUnhurt(kendall)\nDehumanise(abelard, kendall)\nDehumanise(annabella, kendall)\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, kendall) -> Dehumanise(x, abelard))\nforall x (Transgress(x, annabella) -> Victorian(annabella))\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, annabella) and Unhurt(annabella) -> Dehumanise(annabella, abelard))\nDehumanise(abelard, annabella) -> Unhumorous(abelard)\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, abelard) -> Dehumanise(x, annabella))\nDehumanise(abelard, kendall) and Unhurt(kendall) -> Infective(kendall)\nTransgress(abelard, kendall) -> Dehumanise(abelard, annabella)\nforall x (Unhurt(x) and Transgress(x, kendall) -> Rewire(x, annabella))\n\nnot Transgress(abelard, annabella)\n\nnot Transgress(abelard, annabella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The brenn is protective. The bettie conduce the brenn. The justine conduce the brenn. If something conduce the brenn then it conduce the bettie. If something libel the justine then the justine is heterodyne. If something conduce the justine and the justine is protective then the justine conduce the bettie. If the bettie conduce the justine then the bettie is aglow. If something conduce the bettie then it conduce the justine. If the bettie conduce the brenn and the brenn is protective then the brenn is alluring. If the bettie libel the brenn then the bettie conduce the justine. If something is protective and it libel the brenn then it rescue the justine. The justine is cold.", "logic": "\nProtective(brenn)\nConduce(bettie, brenn)\nConduce(justine, brenn)\nforall x (Conduce(x, brenn) -> Conduce(x, bettie))\nforall x (Libel(x, justine) -> Heterodyne(justine))\nforall x (Conduce(x, justine) and Protective(justine) -> Conduce(justine, bettie))\nConduce(bettie, justine) -> Aglow(bettie)\nforall x (Conduce(x, bettie) -> Conduce(x, justine))\nConduce(bettie, brenn) and Protective(brenn) -> Alluring(brenn)\nLibel(bettie, brenn) -> Conduce(bettie, justine)\nforall x (Protective(x) and Libel(x, brenn) -> Rescue(x, justine))\n\nCold(justine)\n\nCold(justine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The verna is passionate. The saul dispirit the verna. The sonnnie dispirit the verna. If something dispirit the verna then it dispirit the saul. If something taxi the sonnnie then the sonnnie is bluish. If something dispirit the sonnnie and the sonnnie is passionate then the sonnnie dispirit the saul. If the saul dispirit the sonnnie then the saul is bimetal. If something dispirit the saul then it dispirit the sonnnie. If the saul dispirit the verna and the verna is passionate then the verna is nary. If the saul taxi the verna then the saul dispirit the sonnnie. If something is passionate and it taxi the verna then it rubberise the sonnnie. The verna is not bimetal.", "logic": "\nPassionate(verna)\nDispirit(saul, verna)\nDispirit(sonnnie, verna)\nforall x (Dispirit(x, verna) -> Dispirit(x, saul))\nforall x (Taxi(x, sonnnie) -> Bluish(sonnnie))\nforall x (Dispirit(x, sonnnie) and Passionate(sonnnie) -> Dispirit(sonnnie, saul))\nDispirit(saul, sonnnie) -> Bimetal(saul)\nforall x (Dispirit(x, saul) -> Dispirit(x, sonnnie))\nDispirit(saul, verna) and Passionate(verna) -> Nary(verna)\nTaxi(saul, verna) -> Dispirit(saul, sonnnie)\nforall x (Passionate(x) and Taxi(x, verna) -> Rubberise(x, sonnnie))\n\nnot Bimetal(verna)\n\nnot Bimetal(verna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "The steffie is preferred. The dona ticket the steffie. The mariel ticket the steffie. If something ticket the steffie then it ticket the dona. If something perennate the mariel then the mariel is cheapjack. If something ticket the mariel and the mariel is preferred then the mariel ticket the dona. If the dona ticket the mariel then the dona is uncheerful. If something ticket the dona then it ticket the mariel. If the dona ticket the steffie and the steffie is preferred then the steffie is deviant. If the dona perennate the steffie then the dona ticket the mariel. If something is preferred and it perennate the steffie then it stool the mariel. The mariel stool the steffie.", "logic": "\nPreferred(steffie)\nTicket(dona, steffie)\nTicket(mariel, steffie)\nforall x (Ticket(x, steffie) -> Ticket(x, dona))\nforall x (Perennate(x, mariel) -> Cheapjack(mariel))\nforall x (Ticket(x, mariel) and Preferred(mariel) -> Ticket(mariel, dona))\nTicket(dona, mariel) -> Uncheerful(dona)\nforall x (Ticket(x, dona) -> Ticket(x, mariel))\nTicket(dona, steffie) and Preferred(steffie) -> Deviant(steffie)\nPerennate(dona, steffie) -> Ticket(dona, mariel)\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Perennate(x, steffie) -> Stool(x, mariel))\n\nStool(mariel, steffie)\n\nStool(mariel, steffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1425"} {"premises": "Emmye is theistic. Emmye is trying. Emmye is igneous. Smart people are not backward. If someone is theistic then they are backward. If someone is backward then they are aperient. Smart, theistic people are aperient. Nice, backward people are discontent. If someone is discontent and not backward then they are not trying. Emmye is trying.", "logic": "\nTheistic(emmye)\nTrying(emmye)\nIgneous(emmye)\nforall x (Variant(x) -> not Backward(x))\nforall x (Theistic(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Backward(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Variant(x) and Theistic(x) -> Aperient(x))\nforall x (Aperient(x) and Backward(x) -> Discontent(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) and not Backward(x) -> not Trying(x))\n\nTrying(emmye)\n\ntherefore Trying(emmye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Gerri is diaphanous. Gerri is clothed. Gerri is earless. Smart people are not repellant. If someone is diaphanous then they are repellant. If someone is repellant then they are squinched. Smart, diaphanous people are squinched. Nice, repellant people are sexy. If someone is sexy and not repellant then they are not clothed. Gerri is not clothed.", "logic": "\nDiaphanous(gerri)\nClothed(gerri)\nEarless(gerri)\nforall x (Amateur(x) -> not Repellant(x))\nforall x (Diaphanous(x) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Squinched(x))\nforall x (Amateur(x) and Diaphanous(x) -> Squinched(x))\nforall x (Squinched(x) and Repellant(x) -> Sexy(x))\nforall x (Sexy(x) and not Repellant(x) -> not Clothed(x))\n\nnot Clothed(gerri)\n\ntherefore Clothed(gerri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Jenifer is unguarded. Jenifer is albanian. Jenifer is occidental. Smart people are not corded. If someone is unguarded then they are corded. If someone is corded then they are mobbish. Smart, unguarded people are mobbish. Nice, corded people are farthest. If someone is farthest and not corded then they are not albanian. Jenifer is corded.", "logic": "\nUnguarded(jenifer)\nAlbanian(jenifer)\nOccidental(jenifer)\nforall x (Optical(x) -> not Corded(x))\nforall x (Unguarded(x) -> Corded(x))\nforall x (Corded(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Optical(x) and Unguarded(x) -> Mobbish(x))\nforall x (Mobbish(x) and Corded(x) -> Farthest(x))\nforall x (Farthest(x) and not Corded(x) -> not Albanian(x))\n\nCorded(jenifer)\n\nUnguarded(jenifer) and forall x (Unguarded(x) -> Corded(x)) -> therefore Corded(jenifer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Laurance is convulsive. Laurance is sapphic. Laurance is admired. Smart people are not nocent. If someone is convulsive then they are nocent. If someone is nocent then they are coseismic. Smart, convulsive people are coseismic. Nice, nocent people are memberless. If someone is memberless and not nocent then they are not sapphic. Laurance is not nocent.", "logic": "\nConvulsive(laurance)\nSapphic(laurance)\nAdmired(laurance)\nforall x (Bigoted(x) -> not Nocent(x))\nforall x (Convulsive(x) -> Nocent(x))\nforall x (Nocent(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Bigoted(x) and Convulsive(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nforall x (Coseismic(x) and Nocent(x) -> Memberless(x))\nforall x (Memberless(x) and not Nocent(x) -> not Sapphic(x))\n\nnot Nocent(laurance)\n\nConvulsive(laurance) and forall x (Convulsive(x) -> Nocent(x)) -> therefore Nocent(laurance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Audre is superhuman. Audre is encumbered. Audre is ulcerative. Smart people are not offending. If someone is superhuman then they are offending. If someone is offending then they are faustian. Smart, superhuman people are faustian. Nice, offending people are biweekly. If someone is biweekly and not offending then they are not encumbered. Audre is faustian.", "logic": "\nSuperhuman(audre)\nEncumbered(audre)\nUlcerative(audre)\nforall x (Manifold(x) -> not Offending(x))\nforall x (Superhuman(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Offending(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Manifold(x) and Superhuman(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Faustian(x) and Offending(x) -> Biweekly(x))\nforall x (Biweekly(x) and not Offending(x) -> not Encumbered(x))\n\nFaustian(audre)\n\nSuperhuman(audre) and forall x (Superhuman(x) -> Offending(x)) -> therefore Offending(audre) Offending(audre) and forall x (Offending(x) -> Faustian(x)) -> therefore Faustian(audre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Demetra is treasured. Demetra is screwy. Demetra is ghoulish. Smart people are not discerning. If someone is treasured then they are discerning. If someone is discerning then they are together. Smart, treasured people are together. Nice, discerning people are caecal. If someone is caecal and not discerning then they are not screwy. Demetra is not together.", "logic": "\nTreasured(demetra)\nScrewy(demetra)\nGhoulish(demetra)\nforall x (Binate(x) -> not Discerning(x))\nforall x (Treasured(x) -> Discerning(x))\nforall x (Discerning(x) -> Together(x))\nforall x (Binate(x) and Treasured(x) -> Together(x))\nforall x (Together(x) and Discerning(x) -> Caecal(x))\nforall x (Caecal(x) and not Discerning(x) -> not Screwy(x))\n\nnot Together(demetra)\n\nTreasured(demetra) and forall x (Treasured(x) -> Discerning(x)) -> therefore Discerning(demetra) Discerning(demetra) and forall x (Discerning(x) -> Together(x)) -> therefore Together(demetra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Lorelle is expensive. Lorelle is managerial. Lorelle is starlit. Smart people are not monodical. If someone is expensive then they are monodical. If someone is monodical then they are unthinking. Smart, expensive people are unthinking. Nice, monodical people are smelly. If someone is smelly and not monodical then they are not managerial. Lorelle is smelly.", "logic": "\nExpensive(lorelle)\nManagerial(lorelle)\nStarlit(lorelle)\nforall x (Doltish(x) -> not Monodical(x))\nforall x (Expensive(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) and Expensive(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) and Monodical(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) and not Monodical(x) -> not Managerial(x))\n\nSmelly(lorelle)\n\nExpensive(lorelle) and forall x (Expensive(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(lorelle) Monodical(lorelle) and forall x (Monodical(x) -> Unthinking(x)) -> therefore Unthinking(lorelle) Expensive(lorelle) and forall x (Expensive(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(lorelle) Unthinking(lorelle) and Monodical(lorelle) and forall x (Unthinking(x) and Monodical(x) -> Smelly(x)) -> therefore Smelly(lorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Sheldon is indian. Sheldon is nacreous. Sheldon is bonnie. Smart people are not statutory. If someone is indian then they are statutory. If someone is statutory then they are telescoped. Smart, indian people are telescoped. Nice, statutory people are searing. If someone is searing and not statutory then they are not nacreous. Sheldon is not searing.", "logic": "\nIndian(sheldon)\nNacreous(sheldon)\nBonnie(sheldon)\nforall x (Crack(x) -> not Statutory(x))\nforall x (Indian(x) -> Statutory(x))\nforall x (Statutory(x) -> Telescoped(x))\nforall x (Crack(x) and Indian(x) -> Telescoped(x))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) and Statutory(x) -> Searing(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) and not Statutory(x) -> not Nacreous(x))\n\nnot Searing(sheldon)\n\nIndian(sheldon) and forall x (Indian(x) -> Statutory(x)) -> therefore Statutory(sheldon) Statutory(sheldon) and forall x (Statutory(x) -> Telescoped(x)) -> therefore Telescoped(sheldon) Indian(sheldon) and forall x (Indian(x) -> Statutory(x)) -> therefore Statutory(sheldon) Telescoped(sheldon) and Statutory(sheldon) and forall x (Telescoped(x) and Statutory(x) -> Searing(x)) -> therefore Searing(sheldon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1001"} {"premises": "Matilde is stock. Arda is glib. Lefty is glib. Pavla is sequined. If someone is khaki and sequined then they are stock. If someone is squiffy and glib then they are sequined. If someone is stock then they are sequined. White, awash people are errant. White people are awash. Kind people are squiffy. Lefty is glib.", "logic": "\nStock(matilde)\nGlib(arda)\nGlib(lefty)\nSequined(pavla)\nforall x (Khaki(x) and Sequined(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Squiffy(x) and Glib(x) -> Sequined(x))\nforall x (Stock(x) -> Sequined(x))\nforall x (Sequined(x) and Awash(x) -> Errant(x))\nforall x (Sequined(x) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Glib(x) -> Squiffy(x))\n\nGlib(lefty)\n\ntherefore Glib(lefty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Hale is vexed. Guy is pervasive. Rebbecca is pervasive. Andie is boney. If someone is frostian and boney then they are vexed. If someone is moonlike and pervasive then they are boney. If someone is vexed then they are boney. White, sternal people are accoutered. White people are sternal. Kind people are moonlike. Rebbecca is not pervasive.", "logic": "\nVexed(hale)\nPervasive(guy)\nPervasive(rebbecca)\nBoney(andie)\nforall x (Frostian(x) and Boney(x) -> Vexed(x))\nforall x (Moonlike(x) and Pervasive(x) -> Boney(x))\nforall x (Vexed(x) -> Boney(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) and Sternal(x) -> Accoutered(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> Sternal(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) -> Moonlike(x))\n\nnot Pervasive(rebbecca)\n\ntherefore Pervasive(rebbecca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Jehu is blebby. Ehud is moblike. Garvey is moblike. Edsel is sinless. If someone is scowling and sinless then they are blebby. If someone is homologous and moblike then they are sinless. If someone is blebby then they are sinless. White, unlipped people are unlivable. White people are unlipped. Kind people are homologous. Jehu is sinless.", "logic": "\nBlebby(jehu)\nMoblike(ehud)\nMoblike(garvey)\nSinless(edsel)\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Sinless(x) -> Blebby(x))\nforall x (Homologous(x) and Moblike(x) -> Sinless(x))\nforall x (Blebby(x) -> Sinless(x))\nforall x (Sinless(x) and Unlipped(x) -> Unlivable(x))\nforall x (Sinless(x) -> Unlipped(x))\nforall x (Moblike(x) -> Homologous(x))\n\nSinless(jehu)\n\nBlebby(jehu) and forall x (Blebby(x) -> Sinless(x)) -> therefore Sinless(jehu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Letty is foreboding. Kerrie is infallible. Nathanial is infallible. Brandice is acidulous. If someone is offish and acidulous then they are foreboding. If someone is bibliotic and infallible then they are acidulous. If someone is foreboding then they are acidulous. White, wolfish people are rhomboid. White people are wolfish. Kind people are bibliotic. Letty is not acidulous.", "logic": "\nForeboding(letty)\nInfallible(kerrie)\nInfallible(nathanial)\nAcidulous(brandice)\nforall x (Offish(x) and Acidulous(x) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) and Infallible(x) -> Acidulous(x))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Acidulous(x))\nforall x (Acidulous(x) and Wolfish(x) -> Rhomboid(x))\nforall x (Acidulous(x) -> Wolfish(x))\nforall x (Infallible(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\n\nnot Acidulous(letty)\n\nForeboding(letty) and forall x (Foreboding(x) -> Acidulous(x)) -> therefore Acidulous(letty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Tiana is arthralgic. Skylar is stocky. Bunni is stocky. Pryce is dazzled. If someone is untidy and dazzled then they are arthralgic. If someone is boskopoid and stocky then they are dazzled. If someone is arthralgic then they are dazzled. White, daft people are unsoiled. White people are daft. Kind people are boskopoid. Bunni is dazzled.", "logic": "\nArthralgic(tiana)\nStocky(skylar)\nStocky(bunni)\nDazzled(pryce)\nforall x (Untidy(x) and Dazzled(x) -> Arthralgic(x))\nforall x (Boskopoid(x) and Stocky(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nforall x (Arthralgic(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) and Daft(x) -> Unsoiled(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) -> Daft(x))\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> Boskopoid(x))\n\nDazzled(bunni)\n\nStocky(bunni) and forall x (Stocky(x) -> Boskopoid(x)) -> therefore Boskopoid(bunni) Boskopoid(bunni) and Stocky(bunni) and forall x (Boskopoid(x) and Stocky(x) -> Dazzled(x)) -> therefore Dazzled(bunni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Daren is sculptured. Kristen is unwell. Drew is unwell. Livia is braw. If someone is unenclosed and braw then they are sculptured. If someone is half and unwell then they are braw. If someone is sculptured then they are braw. White, simplex people are retro. White people are simplex. Kind people are half. Kristen is not braw.", "logic": "\nSculptured(daren)\nUnwell(kristen)\nUnwell(drew)\nBraw(livia)\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) and Braw(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Half(x) and Unwell(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) and Simplex(x) -> Retro(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) -> Simplex(x))\nforall x (Unwell(x) -> Half(x))\n\nnot Braw(kristen)\n\nUnwell(kristen) and forall x (Unwell(x) -> Half(x)) -> therefore Half(kristen) Half(kristen) and Unwell(kristen) and forall x (Half(x) and Unwell(x) -> Braw(x)) -> therefore Braw(kristen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Phyllis is bordered. Zenia is germanic. Stephenie is germanic. Samuel is informed. If someone is neoliberal and informed then they are bordered. If someone is cantering and germanic then they are informed. If someone is bordered then they are informed. White, clannish people are rivalrous. White people are clannish. Kind people are cantering. Stephenie is clannish.", "logic": "\nBordered(phyllis)\nGermanic(zenia)\nGermanic(stephenie)\nInformed(samuel)\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Informed(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Cantering(x) and Germanic(x) -> Informed(x))\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Informed(x))\nforall x (Informed(x) and Clannish(x) -> Rivalrous(x))\nforall x (Informed(x) -> Clannish(x))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Cantering(x))\n\nClannish(stephenie)\n\nGermanic(stephenie) and forall x (Germanic(x) -> Cantering(x)) -> therefore Cantering(stephenie) Cantering(stephenie) and Germanic(stephenie) and forall x (Cantering(x) and Germanic(x) -> Informed(x)) -> therefore Informed(stephenie) Informed(stephenie) and forall x (Informed(x) -> Clannish(x)) -> therefore Clannish(stephenie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Kriste is wayward. Bonnee is deviate. Ami is deviate. Bria is hebraical. If someone is rocklike and hebraical then they are wayward. If someone is washed and deviate then they are hebraical. If someone is wayward then they are hebraical. White, priestly people are mothy. White people are priestly. Kind people are washed. Ami is not priestly.", "logic": "\nWayward(kriste)\nDeviate(bonnee)\nDeviate(ami)\nHebraical(bria)\nforall x (Rocklike(x) and Hebraical(x) -> Wayward(x))\nforall x (Washed(x) and Deviate(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nforall x (Wayward(x) -> Hebraical(x))\nforall x (Hebraical(x) and Priestly(x) -> Mothy(x))\nforall x (Hebraical(x) -> Priestly(x))\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Washed(x))\n\nnot Priestly(ami)\n\nDeviate(ami) and forall x (Deviate(x) -> Washed(x)) -> therefore Washed(ami) Washed(ami) and Deviate(ami) and forall x (Washed(x) and Deviate(x) -> Hebraical(x)) -> therefore Hebraical(ami) Hebraical(ami) and forall x (Hebraical(x) -> Priestly(x)) -> therefore Priestly(ami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Flower is unending. Bobette is dormy. Steffane is dormy. Mellicent is goalless. If someone is mammalian and goalless then they are unending. If someone is sardinian and dormy then they are goalless. If someone is unending then they are goalless. White, foliated people are cultural. White people are foliated. Kind people are sardinian. Mellicent is not sardinian.", "logic": "\nUnending(flower)\nDormy(bobette)\nDormy(steffane)\nGoalless(mellicent)\nforall x (Mammalian(x) and Goalless(x) -> Unending(x))\nforall x (Sardinian(x) and Dormy(x) -> Goalless(x))\nforall x (Unending(x) -> Goalless(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) and Foliated(x) -> Cultural(x))\nforall x (Goalless(x) -> Foliated(x))\nforall x (Dormy(x) -> Sardinian(x))\n\nnot Sardinian(mellicent)\n\nforall x (Dormy(x) -> Sardinian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Allegra is immanent. Aloise is cashable. Rayner is cashable. Melicent is placental. If someone is inflatable and placental then they are immanent. If someone is yonder and cashable then they are placental. If someone is immanent then they are placental. White, functional people are czaristic. White people are functional. Kind people are yonder. Allegra is yonder.", "logic": "\nImmanent(allegra)\nCashable(aloise)\nCashable(rayner)\nPlacental(melicent)\nforall x (Inflatable(x) and Placental(x) -> Immanent(x))\nforall x (Yonder(x) and Cashable(x) -> Placental(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) -> Placental(x))\nforall x (Placental(x) and Functional(x) -> Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Placental(x) -> Functional(x))\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> Yonder(x))\n\nYonder(allegra)\n\nforall x (Cashable(x) -> Yonder(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Shoshana is blastular. Georgette is select. Licha is select. Elsey is bibliotic. If someone is crippled and bibliotic then they are blastular. If someone is vascular and select then they are bibliotic. If someone is blastular then they are bibliotic. White, honourable people are offsides. White people are honourable. Kind people are vascular. Georgette is not blastular.", "logic": "\nBlastular(shoshana)\nSelect(georgette)\nSelect(licha)\nBibliotic(elsey)\nforall x (Crippled(x) and Bibliotic(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Vascular(x) and Select(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Bibliotic(x))\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) and Honourable(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Bibliotic(x) -> Honourable(x))\nforall x (Select(x) -> Vascular(x))\n\nnot Blastular(georgette)\n\nforall x (Crippled(x) and Bibliotic(x) -> Blastular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Marje is trained. Beaufort is decent. Hillary is decent. Mirna is alto. If someone is infuriated and alto then they are trained. If someone is topped and decent then they are alto. If someone is trained then they are alto. White, droopy people are uncheerful. White people are droopy. Kind people are topped. Hillary is trained.", "logic": "\nTrained(marje)\nDecent(beaufort)\nDecent(hillary)\nAlto(mirna)\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Alto(x) -> Trained(x))\nforall x (Topped(x) and Decent(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) and Droopy(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\nforall x (Alto(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) -> Topped(x))\n\nTrained(hillary)\n\nforall x (Infuriated(x) and Alto(x) -> Trained(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Shimon is mitigated. Berchtold is achromatic. Staford is achromatic. Allan is bratty. If someone is teenaged and bratty then they are mitigated. If someone is insanitary and achromatic then they are bratty. If someone is mitigated then they are bratty. White, unsugared people are maddening. White people are unsugared. Kind people are insanitary. Staford is not teenaged.", "logic": "\nMitigated(shimon)\nAchromatic(berchtold)\nAchromatic(staford)\nBratty(allan)\nforall x (Teenaged(x) and Bratty(x) -> Mitigated(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Bratty(x))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) -> Bratty(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) and Unsugared(x) -> Maddening(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Unsugared(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Insanitary(x))\n\nnot Teenaged(staford)\n\nnot Teenaged(staford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Anita is greensick. Lust is marooned. Wolfy is marooned. Yance is plentiful. If someone is unwoven and plentiful then they are greensick. If someone is satiny and marooned then they are plentiful. If someone is greensick then they are plentiful. White, rushy people are avertable. White people are rushy. Kind people are satiny. Anita is marooned.", "logic": "\nGreensick(anita)\nMarooned(lust)\nMarooned(wolfy)\nPlentiful(yance)\nforall x (Unwoven(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Greensick(x))\nforall x (Satiny(x) and Marooned(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Greensick(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Plentiful(x) and Rushy(x) -> Avertable(x))\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> Rushy(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) -> Satiny(x))\n\nMarooned(anita)\n\nMarooned(anita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Hall is upcountry. Barny is adnexal. Josey is adnexal. Del is existing. If someone is inedible and existing then they are upcountry. If someone is spaced and adnexal then they are existing. If someone is upcountry then they are existing. White, lxvi people are arborous. White people are lxvi. Kind people are spaced. Del is not adnexal.", "logic": "\nUpcountry(hall)\nAdnexal(barny)\nAdnexal(josey)\nExisting(del)\nforall x (Inedible(x) and Existing(x) -> Upcountry(x))\nforall x (Spaced(x) and Adnexal(x) -> Existing(x))\nforall x (Upcountry(x) -> Existing(x))\nforall x (Existing(x) and Lxvi(x) -> Arborous(x))\nforall x (Existing(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) -> Spaced(x))\n\nnot Adnexal(del)\n\nnot Adnexal(del) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "Boniface is unopposed. Maynard is blamed. Hew is blamed. Laura is biddable. If someone is apocarpous and biddable then they are unopposed. If someone is gemmed and blamed then they are biddable. If someone is unopposed then they are biddable. White, catenulate people are seriocomic. White people are catenulate. Kind people are gemmed. Maynard is apocarpous.", "logic": "\nUnopposed(boniface)\nBlamed(maynard)\nBlamed(hew)\nBiddable(laura)\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) and Biddable(x) -> Unopposed(x))\nforall x (Gemmed(x) and Blamed(x) -> Biddable(x))\nforall x (Unopposed(x) -> Biddable(x))\nforall x (Biddable(x) and Catenulate(x) -> Seriocomic(x))\nforall x (Biddable(x) -> Catenulate(x))\nforall x (Blamed(x) -> Gemmed(x))\n\nApocarpous(maynard)\n\nApocarpous(maynard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1480"} {"premises": "The naoma is totaled. The naoma is aging. The naoma unbelt the ilene. The ilene bother the billy. The danice is totaled. The danice outcall the billy. The billy is totaled. If someone is oscitant then they visit the naoma. If someone bother the billy then they are aging. If someone bother the naoma then the naoma unbelt the billy. If the billy is autarchic and the billy unbelt the ilene then the ilene bother the danice. If the ilene is oscitant then the ilene bother the danice. If someone is aging then they are totaled. If the ilene outcall the danice and the ilene bother the naoma then the danice outcall the billy. If the ilene is totaled then the ilene unbelt the naoma. The danice outcall the billy.", "logic": "\nTotaled(naoma)\nAging(naoma)\nUnbelt(naoma, ilene)\nBother(ilene, billy)\nTotaled(danice)\nOutcall(danice, billy)\nTotaled(billy)\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Unbelt(x, naoma))\nforall x (Bother(x, billy) -> Aging(x))\nforall x (Bother(x, naoma) -> Unbelt(naoma, billy))\nAutarchic(billy) and Unbelt(billy, ilene) -> Bother(ilene, danice)\nOscitant(ilene) -> Bother(ilene, danice)\nforall x (Aging(x) -> Totaled(x))\nOutcall(ilene, danice) and Bother(ilene, naoma) -> Outcall(danice, billy)\nTotaled(ilene) -> Unbelt(ilene, naoma)\n\nOutcall(danice, billy)\n\ntherefore Outcall(danice, billy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The cookie is nethermost. The cookie is plumbable. The cookie randomise the casper. The casper recast the vitia. The ulric is nethermost. The ulric mitigate the vitia. The vitia is nethermost. If someone is gardant then they visit the cookie. If someone recast the vitia then they are plumbable. If someone recast the cookie then the cookie randomise the vitia. If the vitia is putrescent and the vitia randomise the casper then the casper recast the ulric. If the casper is gardant then the casper recast the ulric. If someone is plumbable then they are nethermost. If the casper mitigate the ulric and the casper recast the cookie then the ulric mitigate the vitia. If the casper is nethermost then the casper randomise the cookie. The ulric does not see the vitia.", "logic": "\nNethermost(cookie)\nPlumbable(cookie)\nRandomise(cookie, casper)\nRecast(casper, vitia)\nNethermost(ulric)\nMitigate(ulric, vitia)\nNethermost(vitia)\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> Randomise(x, cookie))\nforall x (Recast(x, vitia) -> Plumbable(x))\nforall x (Recast(x, cookie) -> Randomise(cookie, vitia))\nPutrescent(vitia) and Randomise(vitia, casper) -> Recast(casper, ulric)\nGardant(casper) -> Recast(casper, ulric)\nforall x (Plumbable(x) -> Nethermost(x))\nMitigate(casper, ulric) and Recast(casper, cookie) -> Mitigate(ulric, vitia)\nNethermost(casper) -> Randomise(casper, cookie)\n\nnot Mitigate(ulric, vitia)\n\ntherefore Mitigate(ulric, vitia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The waneta is toothsome. The waneta is cenobitic. The waneta opacify the joshuah. The joshuah subtitle the garfield. The tyne is toothsome. The tyne palisade the garfield. The garfield is toothsome. If someone is snowbound then they visit the waneta. If someone subtitle the garfield then they are cenobitic. If someone subtitle the waneta then the waneta opacify the garfield. If the garfield is yuman and the garfield opacify the joshuah then the joshuah subtitle the tyne. If the joshuah is snowbound then the joshuah subtitle the tyne. If someone is cenobitic then they are toothsome. If the joshuah palisade the tyne and the joshuah subtitle the waneta then the tyne palisade the garfield. If the joshuah is toothsome then the joshuah opacify the waneta. The joshuah is cenobitic.", "logic": "\nToothsome(waneta)\nCenobitic(waneta)\nOpacify(waneta, joshuah)\nSubtitle(joshuah, garfield)\nToothsome(tyne)\nPalisade(tyne, garfield)\nToothsome(garfield)\nforall x (Snowbound(x) -> Opacify(x, waneta))\nforall x (Subtitle(x, garfield) -> Cenobitic(x))\nforall x (Subtitle(x, waneta) -> Opacify(waneta, garfield))\nYuman(garfield) and Opacify(garfield, joshuah) -> Subtitle(joshuah, tyne)\nSnowbound(joshuah) -> Subtitle(joshuah, tyne)\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nPalisade(joshuah, tyne) and Subtitle(joshuah, waneta) -> Palisade(tyne, garfield)\nToothsome(joshuah) -> Opacify(joshuah, waneta)\n\nCenobitic(joshuah)\n\nSubtitle(joshuah, garfield) and forall x (Subtitle(x, garfield) -> Cenobitic(x)) -> therefore Cenobitic(joshuah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The yehudit is mammalian. The yehudit is whispering. The yehudit fricassee the randall. The randall windsurf the rabi. The bengt is mammalian. The bengt hoist the rabi. The rabi is mammalian. If someone is sextuple then they visit the yehudit. If someone windsurf the rabi then they are whispering. If someone windsurf the yehudit then the yehudit fricassee the rabi. If the rabi is shuddering and the rabi fricassee the randall then the randall windsurf the bengt. If the randall is sextuple then the randall windsurf the bengt. If someone is whispering then they are mammalian. If the randall hoist the bengt and the randall windsurf the yehudit then the bengt hoist the rabi. If the randall is mammalian then the randall fricassee the yehudit. The randall is not whispering.", "logic": "\nMammalian(yehudit)\nWhispering(yehudit)\nFricassee(yehudit, randall)\nWindsurf(randall, rabi)\nMammalian(bengt)\nHoist(bengt, rabi)\nMammalian(rabi)\nforall x (Sextuple(x) -> Fricassee(x, yehudit))\nforall x (Windsurf(x, rabi) -> Whispering(x))\nforall x (Windsurf(x, yehudit) -> Fricassee(yehudit, rabi))\nShuddering(rabi) and Fricassee(rabi, randall) -> Windsurf(randall, bengt)\nSextuple(randall) -> Windsurf(randall, bengt)\nforall x (Whispering(x) -> Mammalian(x))\nHoist(randall, bengt) and Windsurf(randall, yehudit) -> Hoist(bengt, rabi)\nMammalian(randall) -> Fricassee(randall, yehudit)\n\nnot Whispering(randall)\n\nWindsurf(randall, rabi) and forall x (Windsurf(x, rabi) -> Whispering(x)) -> therefore Whispering(randall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The rodolphe is parturient. The rodolphe is japanese. The rodolphe clomp the augusta. The augusta captain the ruperto. The storey is parturient. The storey steepen the ruperto. The ruperto is parturient. If someone is backswept then they visit the rodolphe. If someone captain the ruperto then they are japanese. If someone captain the rodolphe then the rodolphe clomp the ruperto. If the ruperto is skilful and the ruperto clomp the augusta then the augusta captain the storey. If the augusta is backswept then the augusta captain the storey. If someone is japanese then they are parturient. If the augusta steepen the storey and the augusta captain the rodolphe then the storey steepen the ruperto. If the augusta is parturient then the augusta clomp the rodolphe. The augusta is parturient.", "logic": "\nParturient(rodolphe)\nJapanese(rodolphe)\nClomp(rodolphe, augusta)\nCaptain(augusta, ruperto)\nParturient(storey)\nSteepen(storey, ruperto)\nParturient(ruperto)\nforall x (Backswept(x) -> Clomp(x, rodolphe))\nforall x (Captain(x, ruperto) -> Japanese(x))\nforall x (Captain(x, rodolphe) -> Clomp(rodolphe, ruperto))\nSkilful(ruperto) and Clomp(ruperto, augusta) -> Captain(augusta, storey)\nBackswept(augusta) -> Captain(augusta, storey)\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> Parturient(x))\nSteepen(augusta, storey) and Captain(augusta, rodolphe) -> Steepen(storey, ruperto)\nParturient(augusta) -> Clomp(augusta, rodolphe)\n\nParturient(augusta)\n\nCaptain(augusta, ruperto) and forall x (Captain(x, ruperto) -> Japanese(x)) -> therefore Japanese(augusta) Japanese(augusta) and forall x (Japanese(x) -> Parturient(x)) -> therefore Parturient(augusta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The margit is biface. The margit is pavlovian. The margit troat the morganne. The morganne invent the vitia. The reta is biface. The reta mushroom the vitia. The vitia is biface. If someone is augitic then they visit the margit. If someone invent the vitia then they are pavlovian. If someone invent the margit then the margit troat the vitia. If the vitia is relocated and the vitia troat the morganne then the morganne invent the reta. If the morganne is augitic then the morganne invent the reta. If someone is pavlovian then they are biface. If the morganne mushroom the reta and the morganne invent the margit then the reta mushroom the vitia. If the morganne is biface then the morganne troat the margit. The morganne is not biface.", "logic": "\nBiface(margit)\nPavlovian(margit)\nTroat(margit, morganne)\nInvent(morganne, vitia)\nBiface(reta)\nMushroom(reta, vitia)\nBiface(vitia)\nforall x (Augitic(x) -> Troat(x, margit))\nforall x (Invent(x, vitia) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Invent(x, margit) -> Troat(margit, vitia))\nRelocated(vitia) and Troat(vitia, morganne) -> Invent(morganne, reta)\nAugitic(morganne) -> Invent(morganne, reta)\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) -> Biface(x))\nMushroom(morganne, reta) and Invent(morganne, margit) -> Mushroom(reta, vitia)\nBiface(morganne) -> Troat(morganne, margit)\n\nnot Biface(morganne)\n\nInvent(morganne, vitia) and forall x (Invent(x, vitia) -> Pavlovian(x)) -> therefore Pavlovian(morganne) Pavlovian(morganne) and forall x (Pavlovian(x) -> Biface(x)) -> therefore Biface(morganne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The mufi is windy. The mufi is dateable. The mufi goofproof the marni. The marni muff the rubin. The claudetta is windy. The claudetta retouch the rubin. The rubin is windy. If someone is bothersome then they visit the mufi. If someone muff the rubin then they are dateable. If someone muff the mufi then the mufi goofproof the rubin. If the rubin is accusatory and the rubin goofproof the marni then the marni muff the claudetta. If the marni is bothersome then the marni muff the claudetta. If someone is dateable then they are windy. If the marni retouch the claudetta and the marni muff the mufi then the claudetta retouch the rubin. If the marni is windy then the marni goofproof the mufi. The marni goofproof the mufi.", "logic": "\nWindy(mufi)\nDateable(mufi)\nGoofproof(mufi, marni)\nMuff(marni, rubin)\nWindy(claudetta)\nRetouch(claudetta, rubin)\nWindy(rubin)\nforall x (Bothersome(x) -> Goofproof(x, mufi))\nforall x (Muff(x, rubin) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Muff(x, mufi) -> Goofproof(mufi, rubin))\nAccusatory(rubin) and Goofproof(rubin, marni) -> Muff(marni, claudetta)\nBothersome(marni) -> Muff(marni, claudetta)\nforall x (Dateable(x) -> Windy(x))\nRetouch(marni, claudetta) and Muff(marni, mufi) -> Retouch(claudetta, rubin)\nWindy(marni) -> Goofproof(marni, mufi)\n\nGoofproof(marni, mufi)\n\nMuff(marni, rubin) and forall x (Muff(x, rubin) -> Dateable(x)) -> therefore Dateable(marni) Dateable(marni) and forall x (Dateable(x) -> Windy(x)) -> therefore Windy(marni) Windy(marni) and Windy(marni) -> Goofproof(marni, mufi) -> therefore Goofproof(marni, mufi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The koressa is believable. The koressa is preferred. The koressa sample the mamie. The mamie withdraw the florence. The leese is believable. The leese revert the florence. The florence is believable. If someone is corporate then they visit the koressa. If someone withdraw the florence then they are preferred. If someone withdraw the koressa then the koressa sample the florence. If the florence is reactive and the florence sample the mamie then the mamie withdraw the leese. If the mamie is corporate then the mamie withdraw the leese. If someone is preferred then they are believable. If the mamie revert the leese and the mamie withdraw the koressa then the leese revert the florence. If the mamie is believable then the mamie sample the koressa. The mamie does not visit the koressa.", "logic": "\nBelievable(koressa)\nPreferred(koressa)\nSample(koressa, mamie)\nWithdraw(mamie, florence)\nBelievable(leese)\nRevert(leese, florence)\nBelievable(florence)\nforall x (Corporate(x) -> Sample(x, koressa))\nforall x (Withdraw(x, florence) -> Preferred(x))\nforall x (Withdraw(x, koressa) -> Sample(koressa, florence))\nReactive(florence) and Sample(florence, mamie) -> Withdraw(mamie, leese)\nCorporate(mamie) -> Withdraw(mamie, leese)\nforall x (Preferred(x) -> Believable(x))\nRevert(mamie, leese) and Withdraw(mamie, koressa) -> Revert(leese, florence)\nBelievable(mamie) -> Sample(mamie, koressa)\n\nnot Sample(mamie, koressa)\n\nWithdraw(mamie, florence) and forall x (Withdraw(x, florence) -> Preferred(x)) -> therefore Preferred(mamie) Preferred(mamie) and forall x (Preferred(x) -> Believable(x)) -> therefore Believable(mamie) Believable(mamie) and Believable(mamie) -> Sample(mamie, koressa) -> therefore Sample(mamie, koressa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The claudette is hatless. The claudette is streaky. The claudette typecast the rosella. The rosella citify the chip. The daffie is hatless. The daffie tourney the chip. The chip is hatless. If someone is laryngeal then they visit the claudette. If someone citify the chip then they are streaky. If someone citify the claudette then the claudette typecast the chip. If the chip is gritty and the chip typecast the rosella then the rosella citify the daffie. If the rosella is laryngeal then the rosella citify the daffie. If someone is streaky then they are hatless. If the rosella tourney the daffie and the rosella citify the claudette then the daffie tourney the chip. If the rosella is hatless then the rosella typecast the claudette. The daffie is not streaky.", "logic": "\nHatless(claudette)\nStreaky(claudette)\nTypecast(claudette, rosella)\nCitify(rosella, chip)\nHatless(daffie)\nTourney(daffie, chip)\nHatless(chip)\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Typecast(x, claudette))\nforall x (Citify(x, chip) -> Streaky(x))\nforall x (Citify(x, claudette) -> Typecast(claudette, chip))\nGritty(chip) and Typecast(chip, rosella) -> Citify(rosella, daffie)\nLaryngeal(rosella) -> Citify(rosella, daffie)\nforall x (Streaky(x) -> Hatless(x))\nTourney(rosella, daffie) and Citify(rosella, claudette) -> Tourney(daffie, chip)\nHatless(rosella) -> Typecast(rosella, claudette)\n\nnot Streaky(daffie)\n\nforall x (Citify(x, chip) -> Streaky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The cecile is conventual. The cecile is xxxvi. The cecile dislodge the shandie. The shandie colly the vittoria. The berny is conventual. The berny negative the vittoria. The vittoria is conventual. If someone is silklike then they visit the cecile. If someone colly the vittoria then they are xxxvi. If someone colly the cecile then the cecile dislodge the vittoria. If the vittoria is ignited and the vittoria dislodge the shandie then the shandie colly the berny. If the shandie is silklike then the shandie colly the berny. If someone is xxxvi then they are conventual. If the shandie negative the berny and the shandie colly the cecile then the berny negative the vittoria. If the shandie is conventual then the shandie dislodge the cecile. The cecile dislodge the cecile.", "logic": "\nConventual(cecile)\nXxxvi(cecile)\nDislodge(cecile, shandie)\nColly(shandie, vittoria)\nConventual(berny)\nNegative(berny, vittoria)\nConventual(vittoria)\nforall x (Silklike(x) -> Dislodge(x, cecile))\nforall x (Colly(x, vittoria) -> Xxxvi(x))\nforall x (Colly(x, cecile) -> Dislodge(cecile, vittoria))\nIgnited(vittoria) and Dislodge(vittoria, shandie) -> Colly(shandie, berny)\nSilklike(shandie) -> Colly(shandie, berny)\nforall x (Xxxvi(x) -> Conventual(x))\nNegative(shandie, berny) and Colly(shandie, cecile) -> Negative(berny, vittoria)\nConventual(shandie) -> Dislodge(shandie, cecile)\n\nDislodge(cecile, cecile)\n\nforall x (Silklike(x) -> Dislodge(x, cecile)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The eleonora is yellowish. The eleonora is tortuous. The eleonora enamel the daryle. The daryle standpat the cyndi. The robina is yellowish. The robina hose the cyndi. The cyndi is yellowish. If someone is baked then they visit the eleonora. If someone standpat the cyndi then they are tortuous. If someone standpat the eleonora then the eleonora enamel the cyndi. If the cyndi is standpat and the cyndi enamel the daryle then the daryle standpat the robina. If the daryle is baked then the daryle standpat the robina. If someone is tortuous then they are yellowish. If the daryle hose the robina and the daryle standpat the eleonora then the robina hose the cyndi. If the daryle is yellowish then the daryle enamel the eleonora. The cyndi is not tortuous.", "logic": "\nYellowish(eleonora)\nTortuous(eleonora)\nEnamel(eleonora, daryle)\nRound(daryle, cyndi)\nYellowish(robina)\nHose(robina, cyndi)\nYellowish(cyndi)\nforall x (Baked(x) -> Enamel(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Round(x, cyndi) -> Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Round(x, eleonora) -> Enamel(eleonora, cyndi))\nStandpat(cyndi) and Enamel(cyndi, daryle) -> Round(daryle, robina)\nBaked(daryle) -> Round(daryle, robina)\nforall x (Tortuous(x) -> Yellowish(x))\nHose(daryle, robina) and Round(daryle, eleonora) -> Hose(robina, cyndi)\nYellowish(daryle) -> Enamel(daryle, eleonora)\n\nnot Tortuous(cyndi)\n\nforall x (Round(x, cyndi) -> Tortuous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The rand is unalike. The rand is esthetical. The rand surround the allys. The allys trammel the sivert. The englebert is unalike. The englebert transcend the sivert. The sivert is unalike. If someone is neckless then they visit the rand. If someone trammel the sivert then they are esthetical. If someone trammel the rand then the rand surround the sivert. If the sivert is overfed and the sivert surround the allys then the allys trammel the englebert. If the allys is neckless then the allys trammel the englebert. If someone is esthetical then they are unalike. If the allys transcend the englebert and the allys trammel the rand then the englebert transcend the sivert. If the allys is unalike then the allys surround the rand. The sivert surround the rand.", "logic": "\nUnalike(rand)\nEsthetical(rand)\nSurround(rand, allys)\nTrammel(allys, sivert)\nUnalike(englebert)\nTranscend(englebert, sivert)\nUnalike(sivert)\nforall x (Neckless(x) -> Surround(x, rand))\nforall x (Trammel(x, sivert) -> Esthetical(x))\nforall x (Trammel(x, rand) -> Surround(rand, sivert))\nOverfed(sivert) and Surround(sivert, allys) -> Trammel(allys, englebert)\nNeckless(allys) -> Trammel(allys, englebert)\nforall x (Esthetical(x) -> Unalike(x))\nTranscend(allys, englebert) and Trammel(allys, rand) -> Transcend(englebert, sivert)\nUnalike(allys) -> Surround(allys, rand)\n\nSurround(sivert, rand)\n\nforall x (Neckless(x) -> Surround(x, rand)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The hilda is focused. The hilda is purposive. The hilda scrap the alyse. The alyse infract the olympe. The kameko is focused. The kameko trepan the olympe. The olympe is focused. If someone is energizing then they visit the hilda. If someone infract the olympe then they are purposive. If someone infract the hilda then the hilda scrap the olympe. If the olympe is federate and the olympe scrap the alyse then the alyse infract the kameko. If the alyse is energizing then the alyse infract the kameko. If someone is purposive then they are focused. If the alyse trepan the kameko and the alyse infract the hilda then the kameko trepan the olympe. If the alyse is focused then the alyse scrap the hilda. The olympe is not green.", "logic": "\nFocused(hilda)\nPurposive(hilda)\nScrap(hilda, alyse)\nInfract(alyse, olympe)\nFocused(kameko)\nTrepan(kameko, olympe)\nFocused(olympe)\nforall x (Energizing(x) -> Scrap(x, hilda))\nforall x (Infract(x, olympe) -> Purposive(x))\nforall x (Infract(x, hilda) -> Scrap(hilda, olympe))\nFederate(olympe) and Scrap(olympe, alyse) -> Infract(alyse, kameko)\nEnergizing(alyse) -> Infract(alyse, kameko)\nforall x (Purposive(x) -> Focused(x))\nTrepan(alyse, kameko) and Infract(alyse, hilda) -> Trepan(kameko, olympe)\nFocused(alyse) -> Scrap(alyse, hilda)\n\nnot Green(olympe)\n\nnot Green(olympe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The leland is turbinate. The leland is sopranino. The leland reprove the royce. The royce drug the corissa. The welsh is turbinate. The welsh zest the corissa. The corissa is turbinate. If someone is mirrorlike then they visit the leland. If someone drug the corissa then they are sopranino. If someone drug the leland then the leland reprove the corissa. If the corissa is bitchy and the corissa reprove the royce then the royce drug the welsh. If the royce is mirrorlike then the royce drug the welsh. If someone is sopranino then they are turbinate. If the royce zest the welsh and the royce drug the leland then the welsh zest the corissa. If the royce is turbinate then the royce reprove the leland. The leland drug the welsh.", "logic": "\nTurbinate(leland)\nSopranino(leland)\nReprove(leland, royce)\nDrug(royce, corissa)\nTurbinate(welsh)\nZest(welsh, corissa)\nTurbinate(corissa)\nforall x (Mirrorlike(x) -> Reprove(x, leland))\nforall x (Drug(x, corissa) -> Sopranino(x))\nforall x (Drug(x, leland) -> Reprove(leland, corissa))\nBitchy(corissa) and Reprove(corissa, royce) -> Drug(royce, welsh)\nMirrorlike(royce) -> Drug(royce, welsh)\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Turbinate(x))\nZest(royce, welsh) and Drug(royce, leland) -> Zest(welsh, corissa)\nTurbinate(royce) -> Reprove(royce, leland)\n\nDrug(leland, welsh)\n\nDrug(leland, welsh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The gerladina is agrypnotic. The gerladina is potbellied. The gerladina exasperate the gipsy. The gipsy ascend the missie. The marrissa is agrypnotic. The marrissa mutilate the missie. The missie is agrypnotic. If someone is last then they visit the gerladina. If someone ascend the missie then they are potbellied. If someone ascend the gerladina then the gerladina exasperate the missie. If the missie is buffoonish and the missie exasperate the gipsy then the gipsy ascend the marrissa. If the gipsy is last then the gipsy ascend the marrissa. If someone is potbellied then they are agrypnotic. If the gipsy mutilate the marrissa and the gipsy ascend the gerladina then the marrissa mutilate the missie. If the gipsy is agrypnotic then the gipsy exasperate the gerladina. The missie does not visit the marrissa.", "logic": "\nAgrypnotic(gerladina)\nPotbellied(gerladina)\nExasperate(gerladina, gipsy)\nAscend(gipsy, missie)\nAgrypnotic(marrissa)\nMutilate(marrissa, missie)\nAgrypnotic(missie)\nforall x (Last(x) -> Exasperate(x, gerladina))\nforall x (Ascend(x, missie) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Ascend(x, gerladina) -> Exasperate(gerladina, missie))\nBuffoonish(missie) and Exasperate(missie, gipsy) -> Ascend(gipsy, marrissa)\nLast(gipsy) -> Ascend(gipsy, marrissa)\nforall x (Potbellied(x) -> Agrypnotic(x))\nMutilate(gipsy, marrissa) and Ascend(gipsy, gerladina) -> Mutilate(marrissa, missie)\nAgrypnotic(gipsy) -> Exasperate(gipsy, gerladina)\n\nnot Exasperate(missie, marrissa)\n\nnot Exasperate(missie, marrissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "The joly is halting. The joly is valueless. The joly glance the marysa. The marysa single the ferguson. The annalee is halting. The annalee track the ferguson. The ferguson is halting. If someone is injured then they visit the joly. If someone single the ferguson then they are valueless. If someone single the joly then the joly glance the ferguson. If the ferguson is done and the ferguson glance the marysa then the marysa single the annalee. If the marysa is injured then the marysa single the annalee. If someone is valueless then they are halting. If the marysa track the annalee and the marysa single the joly then the annalee track the ferguson. If the marysa is halting then the marysa glance the joly. The annalee is green.", "logic": "\nHalting(joly)\nValueless(joly)\nGlance(joly, marysa)\nSingle(marysa, ferguson)\nHalting(annalee)\nTrack(annalee, ferguson)\nHalting(ferguson)\nforall x (Injured(x) -> Glance(x, joly))\nforall x (Single(x, ferguson) -> Valueless(x))\nforall x (Single(x, joly) -> Glance(joly, ferguson))\nDone(ferguson) and Glance(ferguson, marysa) -> Single(marysa, annalee)\nInjured(marysa) -> Single(marysa, annalee)\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> Halting(x))\nTrack(marysa, annalee) and Single(marysa, joly) -> Track(annalee, ferguson)\nHalting(marysa) -> Glance(marysa, joly)\n\nGreen(annalee)\n\nGreen(annalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-556"} {"premises": "Friedric is dread. Verna is wired. Shannan is fulminant. Quiet things are lost. If Verna is striped then Verna is lost. All afraid, wired things are lost. Quiet things are lost. Green, lost things are vaccinated. If something is striped then it is wired. If something is vaccinated and fulminant then it is afraid. Green things are fulminant. Shannan is fulminant.", "logic": "\nDread(friedric)\nWired(verna)\nFulminant(shannan)\nforall x (Fulminant(x) -> Lost(x))\nStriped(verna) -> Lost(verna)\nforall x (Afraid(x) and Wired(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Fulminant(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Dread(x) and Lost(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Striped(x) -> Wired(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Fulminant(x) -> Afraid(x))\nforall x (Dread(x) -> Fulminant(x))\n\nFulminant(shannan)\n\ntherefore Fulminant(shannan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Asia is implacable. Opalina is hoary. Carmita is parotid. Quiet things are unfounded. If Opalina is agamic then Opalina is unfounded. All absurd, hoary things are unfounded. Quiet things are unfounded. Green, unfounded things are scorned. If something is agamic then it is hoary. If something is scorned and parotid then it is absurd. Green things are parotid. Asia is not implacable.", "logic": "\nImplacable(asia)\nHoary(opalina)\nParotid(carmita)\nforall x (Parotid(x) -> Unfounded(x))\nAgamic(opalina) -> Unfounded(opalina)\nforall x (Absurd(x) and Hoary(x) -> Unfounded(x))\nforall x (Parotid(x) -> Unfounded(x))\nforall x (Implacable(x) and Unfounded(x) -> Scorned(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Scorned(x) and Parotid(x) -> Absurd(x))\nforall x (Implacable(x) -> Parotid(x))\n\nnot Implacable(asia)\n\ntherefore Implacable(asia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Virgilio is busybodied. Clarette is sparse. Nanon is ragged. Quiet things are grim. If Clarette is sweltering then Clarette is grim. All twinned, sparse things are grim. Quiet things are grim. Green, grim things are botswanan. If something is sweltering then it is sparse. If something is botswanan and ragged then it is twinned. Green things are ragged. Virgilio is ragged.", "logic": "\nBusybodied(virgilio)\nSparse(clarette)\nRagged(nanon)\nforall x (Ragged(x) -> Grim(x))\nSweltering(clarette) -> Grim(clarette)\nforall x (Twinned(x) and Sparse(x) -> Grim(x))\nforall x (Ragged(x) -> Grim(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) and Grim(x) -> Botswanan(x))\nforall x (Sweltering(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Ragged(x) -> Twinned(x))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) -> Ragged(x))\n\nRagged(virgilio)\n\nBusybodied(virgilio) and forall x (Busybodied(x) -> Ragged(x)) -> therefore Ragged(virgilio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Zeke is seeable. Jada is energising. Kara is ratified. Quiet things are aneuploid. If Jada is abstemious then Jada is aneuploid. All unstinting, energising things are aneuploid. Quiet things are aneuploid. Green, aneuploid things are renewed. If something is abstemious then it is energising. If something is renewed and ratified then it is unstinting. Green things are ratified. Zeke is not ratified.", "logic": "\nSeeable(zeke)\nEnergising(jada)\nRatified(kara)\nforall x (Ratified(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nAbstemious(jada) -> Aneuploid(jada)\nforall x (Unstinting(x) and Energising(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Ratified(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) and Aneuploid(x) -> Renewed(x))\nforall x (Abstemious(x) -> Energising(x))\nforall x (Renewed(x) and Ratified(x) -> Unstinting(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) -> Ratified(x))\n\nnot Ratified(zeke)\n\nSeeable(zeke) and forall x (Seeable(x) -> Ratified(x)) -> therefore Ratified(zeke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Magnus is utilised. Wright is nebulose. Eleanora is linnean. Quiet things are semidark. If Wright is aligning then Wright is semidark. All sabine, nebulose things are semidark. Quiet things are semidark. Green, semidark things are smashed. If something is aligning then it is nebulose. If something is smashed and linnean then it is sabine. Green things are linnean. Magnus is semidark.", "logic": "\nUtilised(magnus)\nNebulose(wright)\nLinnean(eleanora)\nforall x (Linnean(x) -> Semidark(x))\nAligning(wright) -> Semidark(wright)\nforall x (Sabine(x) and Nebulose(x) -> Semidark(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) -> Semidark(x))\nforall x (Utilised(x) and Semidark(x) -> Smashed(x))\nforall x (Aligning(x) -> Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Smashed(x) and Linnean(x) -> Sabine(x))\nforall x (Utilised(x) -> Linnean(x))\n\nSemidark(magnus)\n\nUtilised(magnus) and forall x (Utilised(x) -> Linnean(x)) -> therefore Linnean(magnus) Linnean(magnus) and forall x (Linnean(x) -> Semidark(x)) -> therefore Semidark(magnus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Gordan is porcine. Rivkah is crocked. Beck is lowset. Quiet things are pectic. If Rivkah is stately then Rivkah is pectic. All moroccan, crocked things are pectic. Quiet things are pectic. Green, pectic things are assuasive. If something is stately then it is crocked. If something is assuasive and lowset then it is moroccan. Green things are lowset. Gordan is not pectic.", "logic": "\nPorcine(gordan)\nCrocked(rivkah)\nLowset(beck)\nforall x (Lowset(x) -> Pectic(x))\nStately(rivkah) -> Pectic(rivkah)\nforall x (Moroccan(x) and Crocked(x) -> Pectic(x))\nforall x (Lowset(x) -> Pectic(x))\nforall x (Porcine(x) and Pectic(x) -> Assuasive(x))\nforall x (Stately(x) -> Crocked(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and Lowset(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Porcine(x) -> Lowset(x))\n\nnot Pectic(gordan)\n\nPorcine(gordan) and forall x (Porcine(x) -> Lowset(x)) -> therefore Lowset(gordan) Lowset(gordan) and forall x (Lowset(x) -> Pectic(x)) -> therefore Pectic(gordan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Wilson is cetacean. Reinhard is cyclopean. Doris is unicameral. Quiet things are centered. If Reinhard is uncanny then Reinhard is centered. All tendinous, cyclopean things are centered. Quiet things are centered. Green, centered things are unvalued. If something is uncanny then it is cyclopean. If something is unvalued and unicameral then it is tendinous. Green things are unicameral. Wilson is unvalued.", "logic": "\nCetacean(wilson)\nCyclopean(reinhard)\nUnicameral(doris)\nforall x (Unicameral(x) -> Centered(x))\nUncanny(reinhard) -> Centered(reinhard)\nforall x (Tendinous(x) and Cyclopean(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Unicameral(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) and Centered(x) -> Unvalued(x))\nforall x (Uncanny(x) -> Cyclopean(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) and Unicameral(x) -> Tendinous(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) -> Unicameral(x))\n\nUnvalued(wilson)\n\nCetacean(wilson) and forall x (Cetacean(x) -> Unicameral(x)) -> therefore Unicameral(wilson) Unicameral(wilson) and forall x (Unicameral(x) -> Centered(x)) -> therefore Centered(wilson) Cetacean(wilson) and Centered(wilson) and forall x (Cetacean(x) and Centered(x) -> Unvalued(x)) -> therefore Unvalued(wilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Kayle is illiberal. Allyce is innumerous. Lynnell is bubbly. Quiet things are game. If Allyce is delayed then Allyce is game. All saurian, innumerous things are game. Quiet things are game. Green, game things are mothproof. If something is delayed then it is innumerous. If something is mothproof and bubbly then it is saurian. Green things are bubbly. Kayle is not mothproof.", "logic": "\nIlliberal(kayle)\nInnumerous(allyce)\nBubbly(lynnell)\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Game(x))\nDelayed(allyce) -> Game(allyce)\nforall x (Saurian(x) and Innumerous(x) -> Game(x))\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Game(x))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) and Game(x) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) -> Innumerous(x))\nforall x (Mothproof(x) and Bubbly(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) -> Bubbly(x))\n\nnot Mothproof(kayle)\n\nIlliberal(kayle) and forall x (Illiberal(x) -> Bubbly(x)) -> therefore Bubbly(kayle) Bubbly(kayle) and forall x (Bubbly(x) -> Game(x)) -> therefore Game(kayle) Illiberal(kayle) and Game(kayle) and forall x (Illiberal(x) and Game(x) -> Mothproof(x)) -> therefore Mothproof(kayle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Jehanna is folding. Reg is nonmoving. Kai is mellowed. Quiet things are nighted. If Reg is sulphuric then Reg is nighted. All corrosive, nonmoving things are nighted. Quiet things are nighted. Green, nighted things are sandaled. If something is sulphuric then it is nonmoving. If something is sandaled and mellowed then it is corrosive. Green things are mellowed. Kai is not sandaled.", "logic": "\nFolding(jehanna)\nNonmoving(reg)\nMellowed(kai)\nforall x (Mellowed(x) -> Nighted(x))\nSulphuric(reg) -> Nighted(reg)\nforall x (Corrosive(x) and Nonmoving(x) -> Nighted(x))\nforall x (Mellowed(x) -> Nighted(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) and Nighted(x) -> Sandaled(x))\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Nonmoving(x))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) and Mellowed(x) -> Corrosive(x))\nforall x (Folding(x) -> Mellowed(x))\n\nnot Sandaled(kai)\n\nforall x (Folding(x) and Nighted(x) -> Sandaled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Konstanze is angolan. Melba is coexisting. Perceval is streaked. Quiet things are accredited. If Melba is hornless then Melba is accredited. All binocular, coexisting things are accredited. Quiet things are accredited. Green, accredited things are reedlike. If something is hornless then it is coexisting. If something is reedlike and streaked then it is binocular. Green things are streaked. Melba is streaked.", "logic": "\nAngolan(konstanze)\nCoexisting(melba)\nStreaked(perceval)\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Accredited(x))\nHornless(melba) -> Accredited(melba)\nforall x (Binocular(x) and Coexisting(x) -> Accredited(x))\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Accredited(x))\nforall x (Angolan(x) and Accredited(x) -> Reedlike(x))\nforall x (Hornless(x) -> Coexisting(x))\nforall x (Reedlike(x) and Streaked(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Angolan(x) -> Streaked(x))\n\nStreaked(melba)\n\nforall x (Angolan(x) -> Streaked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Herman is deadly. Elyssa is gibbous. Hubert is unplayful. Quiet things are subjective. If Elyssa is glorious then Elyssa is subjective. All guided, gibbous things are subjective. Quiet things are subjective. Green, subjective things are abdominous. If something is glorious then it is gibbous. If something is abdominous and unplayful then it is guided. Green things are unplayful. Hubert is not guided.", "logic": "\nDeadly(herman)\nGibbous(elyssa)\nUnplayful(hubert)\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Subjective(x))\nGlorious(elyssa) -> Subjective(elyssa)\nforall x (Guided(x) and Gibbous(x) -> Subjective(x))\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Subjective(x))\nforall x (Deadly(x) and Subjective(x) -> Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Glorious(x) -> Gibbous(x))\nforall x (Abdominous(x) and Unplayful(x) -> Guided(x))\nforall x (Deadly(x) -> Unplayful(x))\n\nnot Guided(hubert)\n\nforall x (Abdominous(x) and Unplayful(x) -> Guided(x)) <- forall x (Deadly(x) and Subjective(x) -> Abdominous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Gavin is unbaptised. Calley is nonexempt. Albina is forced. Quiet things are departed. If Calley is eldritch then Calley is departed. All valvular, nonexempt things are departed. Quiet things are departed. Green, departed things are estuarine. If something is eldritch then it is nonexempt. If something is estuarine and forced then it is valvular. Green things are forced. Calley is departed.", "logic": "\nUnbaptised(gavin)\nNonexempt(calley)\nForced(albina)\nforall x (Forced(x) -> Departed(x))\nEldritch(calley) -> Departed(calley)\nforall x (Valvular(x) and Nonexempt(x) -> Departed(x))\nforall x (Forced(x) -> Departed(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and Departed(x) -> Estuarine(x))\nforall x (Eldritch(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\nforall x (Estuarine(x) and Forced(x) -> Valvular(x))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) -> Forced(x))\n\nDeparted(calley)\n\nforall x (Valvular(x) and Nonexempt(x) -> Departed(x)) <- forall x (Estuarine(x) and Forced(x) -> Valvular(x)) <- forall x (Unbaptised(x) and Departed(x) -> Estuarine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Steffen is unscalable. Michaella is unclogged. Berny is asthenic. Quiet things are florentine. If Michaella is seventieth then Michaella is florentine. All unerring, unclogged things are florentine. Quiet things are florentine. Green, florentine things are misshapen. If something is seventieth then it is unclogged. If something is misshapen and asthenic then it is unerring. Green things are asthenic. Michaella is not unscalable.", "logic": "\nUnscalable(steffen)\nUnclogged(michaella)\nAsthenic(berny)\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Florentine(x))\nSeventieth(michaella) -> Florentine(michaella)\nforall x (Unerring(x) and Unclogged(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Asthenic(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Unscalable(x) and Florentine(x) -> Misshapen(x))\nforall x (Seventieth(x) -> Unclogged(x))\nforall x (Misshapen(x) and Asthenic(x) -> Unerring(x))\nforall x (Unscalable(x) -> Asthenic(x))\n\nnot Unscalable(michaella)\n\nnot Unscalable(michaella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Redford is stenotic. Patin is towering. Mora is phocine. Quiet things are diarrhoeic. If Patin is domestic then Patin is diarrhoeic. All redemptory, towering things are diarrhoeic. Quiet things are diarrhoeic. Green, diarrhoeic things are triumphant. If something is domestic then it is towering. If something is triumphant and phocine then it is redemptory. Green things are phocine. Mora is stenotic.", "logic": "\nStenotic(redford)\nTowering(patin)\nPhocine(mora)\nforall x (Phocine(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nDomestic(patin) -> Diarrhoeic(patin)\nforall x (Redemptory(x) and Towering(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (Phocine(x) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) and Diarrhoeic(x) -> Triumphant(x))\nforall x (Domestic(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Triumphant(x) and Phocine(x) -> Redemptory(x))\nforall x (Stenotic(x) -> Phocine(x))\n\nStenotic(mora)\n\nStenotic(mora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Olivie is underway. Isaiah is stylised. Darcie is cagey. Quiet things are immoveable. If Isaiah is euphoriant then Isaiah is immoveable. All clanking, stylised things are immoveable. Quiet things are immoveable. Green, immoveable things are buffeted. If something is euphoriant then it is stylised. If something is buffeted and cagey then it is clanking. Green things are cagey. Darcie is not euphoriant.", "logic": "\nUnderway(olivie)\nStylised(isaiah)\nCagey(darcie)\nforall x (Cagey(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nEuphoriant(isaiah) -> Immoveable(isaiah)\nforall x (Clanking(x) and Stylised(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Cagey(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) and Immoveable(x) -> Buffeted(x))\nforall x (Euphoriant(x) -> Stylised(x))\nforall x (Buffeted(x) and Cagey(x) -> Clanking(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Cagey(x))\n\nnot Euphoriant(darcie)\n\nnot Euphoriant(darcie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "Augustin is bacteremic. Tove is moody. Sharona is nonwoody. Quiet things are hypnotised. If Tove is dreamlike then Tove is hypnotised. All puritanic, moody things are hypnotised. Quiet things are hypnotised. Green, hypnotised things are ceruminous. If something is dreamlike then it is moody. If something is ceruminous and nonwoody then it is puritanic. Green things are nonwoody. Tove is dreamlike.", "logic": "\nBacteremic(augustin)\nMoody(tove)\nNonwoody(sharona)\nforall x (Nonwoody(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\nDreamlike(tove) -> Hypnotised(tove)\nforall x (Puritanic(x) and Moody(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\nforall x (Nonwoody(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) and Hypnotised(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Dreamlike(x) -> Moody(x))\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) and Nonwoody(x) -> Puritanic(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\n\nDreamlike(tove)\n\nDreamlike(tove) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-167"} {"premises": "The joshua oyster the teodoor. The joshua tremor the teodoor. The joshua tremor the pamella. The joshua is permutable. The joshua is pale. The joshua stun the teodoor. The joshua stun the pamella. The teodoor oyster the joshua. The teodoor tremor the joshua. The teodoor stun the joshua. The pamella oyster the joshua. The pamella oyster the teodoor. The pamella tremor the joshua. The pamella is permutable. The pamella stun the joshua. If someone is pale then they are rickety. If someone tremor the joshua then they are pale. The teodoor stun the joshua.", "logic": "\nOyster(joshua, teodoor)\nTremor(joshua, teodoor)\nTremor(joshua, pamella)\nPermutable(joshua)\nPale(joshua)\nStun(joshua, teodoor)\nStun(joshua, pamella)\nOyster(teodoor, joshua)\nTremor(teodoor, joshua)\nStun(teodoor, joshua)\nOyster(pamella, joshua)\nOyster(pamella, teodoor)\nTremor(pamella, joshua)\nPermutable(pamella)\nStun(pamella, joshua)\nforall x (Pale(x) -> Rickety(x))\nforall x (Tremor(x, joshua) -> Pale(x))\n\nStun(teodoor, joshua)\n\ntherefore Stun(teodoor, joshua)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-48"} {"premises": "The rodolphe trammel the shelia. The rodolphe silver the shelia. The rodolphe silver the daryle. The rodolphe is isolated. The rodolphe is haired. The rodolphe gyrate the shelia. The rodolphe gyrate the daryle. The shelia trammel the rodolphe. The shelia silver the rodolphe. The shelia gyrate the rodolphe. The daryle trammel the rodolphe. The daryle trammel the shelia. The daryle silver the rodolphe. The daryle is isolated. The daryle gyrate the rodolphe. If someone is haired then they are repeatable. If someone silver the rodolphe then they are haired. The rodolphe does not chase the shelia.", "logic": "\nTrammel(rodolphe, shelia)\nSilver(rodolphe, shelia)\nSilver(rodolphe, daryle)\nIsolated(rodolphe)\nHaired(rodolphe)\nGyrate(rodolphe, shelia)\nGyrate(rodolphe, daryle)\nTrammel(shelia, rodolphe)\nSilver(shelia, rodolphe)\nGyrate(shelia, rodolphe)\nTrammel(daryle, rodolphe)\nTrammel(daryle, shelia)\nSilver(daryle, rodolphe)\nIsolated(daryle)\nGyrate(daryle, rodolphe)\nforall x (Haired(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Silver(x, rodolphe) -> Haired(x))\n\nnot Trammel(rodolphe, shelia)\n\ntherefore Trammel(rodolphe, shelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-48"} {"premises": "The laurance minimise the nissie. The laurance hitchhike the nissie. The laurance hitchhike the bealle. The laurance is prussian. The laurance is exacting. The laurance appear the nissie. The laurance appear the bealle. The nissie minimise the laurance. The nissie hitchhike the laurance. The nissie appear the laurance. The bealle minimise the laurance. The bealle minimise the nissie. The bealle hitchhike the laurance. The bealle is prussian. The bealle appear the laurance. If someone is exacting then they are ungreased. If someone hitchhike the laurance then they are exacting. The bealle is not big.", "logic": "\nMinimise(laurance, nissie)\nHitchhike(laurance, nissie)\nHitchhike(laurance, bealle)\nPrussian(laurance)\nExacting(laurance)\nAppear(laurance, nissie)\nAppear(laurance, bealle)\nMinimise(nissie, laurance)\nHitchhike(nissie, laurance)\nAppear(nissie, laurance)\nMinimise(bealle, laurance)\nMinimise(bealle, nissie)\nHitchhike(bealle, laurance)\nPrussian(bealle)\nAppear(bealle, laurance)\nforall x (Exacting(x) -> Ungreased(x))\nforall x (Hitchhike(x, laurance) -> Exacting(x))\n\nnot Big(bealle)\n\nnot Big(bealle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-48"} {"premises": "The tallie cavern the malka. The tallie mothproof the malka. The tallie mothproof the mildred. The tallie is nihilistic. The tallie is aeolian. The tallie floodlight the malka. The tallie floodlight the mildred. The malka cavern the tallie. The malka mothproof the tallie. The malka floodlight the tallie. The mildred cavern the tallie. The mildred cavern the malka. The mildred mothproof the tallie. The mildred is nihilistic. The mildred floodlight the tallie. If someone is aeolian then they are notifiable. If someone mothproof the tallie then they are aeolian. The malka is nihilistic.", "logic": "\nCavern(tallie, malka)\nMothproof(tallie, malka)\nMothproof(tallie, mildred)\nNihilistic(tallie)\nAeolian(tallie)\nFloodlight(tallie, malka)\nFloodlight(tallie, mildred)\nCavern(malka, tallie)\nMothproof(malka, tallie)\nFloodlight(malka, tallie)\nCavern(mildred, tallie)\nCavern(mildred, malka)\nMothproof(mildred, tallie)\nNihilistic(mildred)\nFloodlight(mildred, tallie)\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Notifiable(x))\nforall x (Mothproof(x, tallie) -> Aeolian(x))\n\nNihilistic(malka)\n\nNihilistic(malka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-48"} {"premises": "The georgena diddle the lukas. The georgena is unopposed. The georgena is unheaded. The georgena is unamended. The georgena is separative. The georgena is residual. The georgena does not like the lukas. The georgena oversleep the lukas. The lukas does not eat the georgena. The lukas is unopposed. The lukas is unheaded. The lukas is separative. The lukas is residual. The lukas revive the georgena. The lukas oversleep the georgena. If the georgena is unopposed then the georgena oversleep the lukas. If someone revive the georgena and they see the georgena then the georgena oversleep the lukas. If someone diddle the georgena then the georgena is unopposed. If someone diddle the lukas and the lukas oversleep the georgena then they eat the georgena. If someone diddle the lukas and the lukas revive the georgena then they eat the georgena. If the lukas diddle the georgena then the lukas is unopposed. If the georgena is unheaded then the georgena diddle the lukas. If someone is unopposed and they eat the georgena then they do not see the georgena. The georgena is residual.", "logic": "\nDiddle(georgena, lukas)\nUnopposed(georgena)\nUnheaded(georgena)\nUnamended(georgena)\nSeparative(georgena)\nResidual(georgena)\nnot Revive(georgena, lukas)\nOversleep(georgena, lukas)\nnot Diddle(lukas, georgena)\nUnopposed(lukas)\nUnheaded(lukas)\nSeparative(lukas)\nResidual(lukas)\nRevive(lukas, georgena)\nOversleep(lukas, georgena)\nUnopposed(georgena) -> Oversleep(georgena, lukas)\nforall x (Revive(x, georgena) and Oversleep(x, georgena) -> Oversleep(georgena, lukas))\nforall x (Diddle(x, georgena) -> Unopposed(georgena))\nforall x (Diddle(x, lukas) and Oversleep(lukas, georgena) -> Diddle(x, georgena))\nforall x (Diddle(x, lukas) and Revive(lukas, georgena) -> Diddle(x, georgena))\nDiddle(lukas, georgena) -> Unopposed(lukas)\nUnheaded(georgena) -> Diddle(georgena, lukas)\nforall x (Unopposed(x) and Diddle(x, georgena) -> not Oversleep(x, georgena))\n\nResidual(georgena)\n\ntherefore Residual(georgena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "The cybelle overdress the aloysia. The cybelle is eutrophic. The cybelle is spasmodic. The cybelle is attenuate. The cybelle is untactful. The cybelle is variegated. The cybelle does not like the aloysia. The cybelle cannulize the aloysia. The aloysia does not eat the cybelle. The aloysia is eutrophic. The aloysia is spasmodic. The aloysia is untactful. The aloysia is variegated. The aloysia trot the cybelle. The aloysia cannulize the cybelle. If the cybelle is eutrophic then the cybelle cannulize the aloysia. If someone trot the cybelle and they see the cybelle then the cybelle cannulize the aloysia. If someone overdress the cybelle then the cybelle is eutrophic. If someone overdress the aloysia and the aloysia cannulize the cybelle then they eat the cybelle. If someone overdress the aloysia and the aloysia trot the cybelle then they eat the cybelle. If the aloysia overdress the cybelle then the aloysia is eutrophic. If the cybelle is spasmodic then the cybelle overdress the aloysia. If someone is eutrophic and they eat the cybelle then they do not see the cybelle. The aloysia is not eutrophic.", "logic": "\nOverdress(cybelle, aloysia)\nEutrophic(cybelle)\nSpasmodic(cybelle)\nAttenuate(cybelle)\nUntactful(cybelle)\nVariegated(cybelle)\nnot Trot(cybelle, aloysia)\nCannulize(cybelle, aloysia)\nnot Overdress(aloysia, cybelle)\nEutrophic(aloysia)\nSpasmodic(aloysia)\nUntactful(aloysia)\nVariegated(aloysia)\nTrot(aloysia, cybelle)\nCannulize(aloysia, cybelle)\nEutrophic(cybelle) -> Cannulize(cybelle, aloysia)\nforall x (Trot(x, cybelle) and Cannulize(x, cybelle) -> Cannulize(cybelle, aloysia))\nforall x (Overdress(x, cybelle) -> Eutrophic(cybelle))\nforall x (Overdress(x, aloysia) and Cannulize(aloysia, cybelle) -> Overdress(x, cybelle))\nforall x (Overdress(x, aloysia) and Trot(aloysia, cybelle) -> Overdress(x, cybelle))\nOverdress(aloysia, cybelle) -> Eutrophic(aloysia)\nSpasmodic(cybelle) -> Overdress(cybelle, aloysia)\nforall x (Eutrophic(x) and Overdress(x, cybelle) -> not Cannulize(x, cybelle))\n\nnot Eutrophic(aloysia)\n\ntherefore Eutrophic(aloysia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "The jonie misspeak the arturo. The jonie is furled. The jonie is copious. The jonie is noticed. The jonie is leafed. The jonie is vaginal. The jonie does not like the arturo. The jonie intersect the arturo. The arturo does not eat the jonie. The arturo is furled. The arturo is copious. The arturo is leafed. The arturo is vaginal. The arturo hijack the jonie. The arturo intersect the jonie. If the jonie is furled then the jonie intersect the arturo. If someone hijack the jonie and they see the jonie then the jonie intersect the arturo. If someone misspeak the jonie then the jonie is furled. If someone misspeak the arturo and the arturo intersect the jonie then they eat the jonie. If someone misspeak the arturo and the arturo hijack the jonie then they eat the jonie. If the arturo misspeak the jonie then the arturo is furled. If the jonie is copious then the jonie misspeak the arturo. If someone is furled and they eat the jonie then they do not see the jonie. The jonie misspeak the jonie.", "logic": "\nMisspeak(jonie, arturo)\nFurled(jonie)\nCopious(jonie)\nNoticed(jonie)\nLeafed(jonie)\nVaginal(jonie)\nnot Hijack(jonie, arturo)\nIntersect(jonie, arturo)\nnot Misspeak(arturo, jonie)\nFurled(arturo)\nCopious(arturo)\nLeafed(arturo)\nVaginal(arturo)\nHijack(arturo, jonie)\nIntersect(arturo, jonie)\nFurled(jonie) -> Intersect(jonie, arturo)\nforall x (Hijack(x, jonie) and Intersect(x, jonie) -> Intersect(jonie, arturo))\nforall x (Misspeak(x, jonie) -> Furled(jonie))\nforall x (Misspeak(x, arturo) and Intersect(arturo, jonie) -> Misspeak(x, jonie))\nforall x (Misspeak(x, arturo) and Hijack(arturo, jonie) -> Misspeak(x, jonie))\nMisspeak(arturo, jonie) -> Furled(arturo)\nCopious(jonie) -> Misspeak(jonie, arturo)\nforall x (Furled(x) and Misspeak(x, jonie) -> not Intersect(x, jonie))\n\nMisspeak(jonie, jonie)\n\nMisspeak(jonie, arturo) and Hijack(arturo, jonie) and forall x (Misspeak(x, arturo) and Hijack(arturo, jonie) -> Misspeak(x, jonie)) -> therefore Misspeak(jonie, jonie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "The nissa chew the dewitt. The nissa is shaken. The nissa is thoriated. The nissa is payable. The nissa is riveting. The nissa is aphonic. The nissa does not like the dewitt. The nissa humify the dewitt. The dewitt does not eat the nissa. The dewitt is shaken. The dewitt is thoriated. The dewitt is riveting. The dewitt is aphonic. The dewitt speckle the nissa. The dewitt humify the nissa. If the nissa is shaken then the nissa humify the dewitt. If someone speckle the nissa and they see the nissa then the nissa humify the dewitt. If someone chew the nissa then the nissa is shaken. If someone chew the dewitt and the dewitt humify the nissa then they eat the nissa. If someone chew the dewitt and the dewitt speckle the nissa then they eat the nissa. If the dewitt chew the nissa then the dewitt is shaken. If the nissa is thoriated then the nissa chew the dewitt. If someone is shaken and they eat the nissa then they do not see the nissa. The nissa does not eat the nissa.", "logic": "\nChew(nissa, dewitt)\nShaken(nissa)\nThoriated(nissa)\nPayable(nissa)\nRiveting(nissa)\nAphonic(nissa)\nnot Speckle(nissa, dewitt)\nHumify(nissa, dewitt)\nnot Chew(dewitt, nissa)\nShaken(dewitt)\nThoriated(dewitt)\nRiveting(dewitt)\nAphonic(dewitt)\nSpeckle(dewitt, nissa)\nHumify(dewitt, nissa)\nShaken(nissa) -> Humify(nissa, dewitt)\nforall x (Speckle(x, nissa) and Humify(x, nissa) -> Humify(nissa, dewitt))\nforall x (Chew(x, nissa) -> Shaken(nissa))\nforall x (Chew(x, dewitt) and Humify(dewitt, nissa) -> Chew(x, nissa))\nforall x (Chew(x, dewitt) and Speckle(dewitt, nissa) -> Chew(x, nissa))\nChew(dewitt, nissa) -> Shaken(dewitt)\nThoriated(nissa) -> Chew(nissa, dewitt)\nforall x (Shaken(x) and Chew(x, nissa) -> not Humify(x, nissa))\n\nnot Chew(nissa, nissa)\n\nChew(nissa, dewitt) and Speckle(dewitt, nissa) and forall x (Chew(x, dewitt) and Speckle(dewitt, nissa) -> Chew(x, nissa)) -> therefore Chew(nissa, nissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "The ange brew the adlai. The ange is alate. The ange is ohmic. The ange is foolhardy. The ange is capsular. The ange is ignited. The ange does not like the adlai. The ange skid the adlai. The adlai does not eat the ange. The adlai is alate. The adlai is ohmic. The adlai is capsular. The adlai is ignited. The adlai annihilate the ange. The adlai skid the ange. If the ange is alate then the ange skid the adlai. If someone annihilate the ange and they see the ange then the ange skid the adlai. If someone brew the ange then the ange is alate. If someone brew the adlai and the adlai skid the ange then they eat the ange. If someone brew the adlai and the adlai annihilate the ange then they eat the ange. If the adlai brew the ange then the adlai is alate. If the ange is ohmic then the ange brew the adlai. If someone is alate and they eat the ange then they do not see the ange. The adlai does not see the adlai.", "logic": "\nBrew(ange, adlai)\nAlate(ange)\nOhmic(ange)\nFoolhardy(ange)\nCapsular(ange)\nIgnited(ange)\nnot Annihilate(ange, adlai)\nSkid(ange, adlai)\nnot Brew(adlai, ange)\nAlate(adlai)\nOhmic(adlai)\nCapsular(adlai)\nIgnited(adlai)\nAnnihilate(adlai, ange)\nSkid(adlai, ange)\nAlate(ange) -> Skid(ange, adlai)\nforall x (Annihilate(x, ange) and Skid(x, ange) -> Skid(ange, adlai))\nforall x (Brew(x, ange) -> Alate(ange))\nforall x (Brew(x, adlai) and Skid(adlai, ange) -> Brew(x, ange))\nforall x (Brew(x, adlai) and Annihilate(adlai, ange) -> Brew(x, ange))\nBrew(adlai, ange) -> Alate(adlai)\nOhmic(ange) -> Brew(ange, adlai)\nforall x (Alate(x) and Brew(x, ange) -> not Skid(x, ange))\n\nnot Skid(adlai, adlai)\n\nnot Skid(adlai, adlai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "The alice overarch the sile. The alice is sacrosanct. The alice is sole. The alice is permeable. The alice is jagged. The alice is antlered. The alice does not like the sile. The alice create the sile. The sile does not eat the alice. The sile is sacrosanct. The sile is sole. The sile is jagged. The sile is antlered. The sile jazz the alice. The sile create the alice. If the alice is sacrosanct then the alice create the sile. If someone jazz the alice and they see the alice then the alice create the sile. If someone overarch the alice then the alice is sacrosanct. If someone overarch the sile and the sile create the alice then they eat the alice. If someone overarch the sile and the sile jazz the alice then they eat the alice. If the sile overarch the alice then the sile is sacrosanct. If the alice is sole then the alice overarch the sile. If someone is sacrosanct and they eat the alice then they do not see the alice. The sile is permeable.", "logic": "\nOverarch(alice, sile)\nSacrosanct(alice)\nSole(alice)\nPermeable(alice)\nJagged(alice)\nAntlered(alice)\nnot Jazz(alice, sile)\nCreate(alice, sile)\nnot Overarch(sile, alice)\nSacrosanct(sile)\nSole(sile)\nJagged(sile)\nAntlered(sile)\nJazz(sile, alice)\nCreate(sile, alice)\nSacrosanct(alice) -> Create(alice, sile)\nforall x (Jazz(x, alice) and Create(x, alice) -> Create(alice, sile))\nforall x (Overarch(x, alice) -> Sacrosanct(alice))\nforall x (Overarch(x, sile) and Create(sile, alice) -> Overarch(x, alice))\nforall x (Overarch(x, sile) and Jazz(sile, alice) -> Overarch(x, alice))\nOverarch(sile, alice) -> Sacrosanct(sile)\nSole(alice) -> Overarch(alice, sile)\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Overarch(x, alice) -> not Create(x, alice))\n\nPermeable(sile)\n\nPermeable(sile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "The reid conjure the stephanie. The reid is calendered. The reid is raftered. The reid is offended. The reid is loamy. The reid is verbose. The reid does not like the stephanie. The reid withstand the stephanie. The stephanie does not eat the reid. The stephanie is calendered. The stephanie is raftered. The stephanie is loamy. The stephanie is verbose. The stephanie popularise the reid. The stephanie withstand the reid. If the reid is calendered then the reid withstand the stephanie. If someone popularise the reid and they see the reid then the reid withstand the stephanie. If someone conjure the reid then the reid is calendered. If someone conjure the stephanie and the stephanie withstand the reid then they eat the reid. If someone conjure the stephanie and the stephanie popularise the reid then they eat the reid. If the stephanie conjure the reid then the stephanie is calendered. If the reid is raftered then the reid conjure the stephanie. If someone is calendered and they eat the reid then they do not see the reid. The reid does not like the reid.", "logic": "\nConjure(reid, stephanie)\nCalendered(reid)\nRaftered(reid)\nOffended(reid)\nLoamy(reid)\nVerbose(reid)\nnot Popularise(reid, stephanie)\nWithstand(reid, stephanie)\nnot Conjure(stephanie, reid)\nCalendered(stephanie)\nRaftered(stephanie)\nLoamy(stephanie)\nVerbose(stephanie)\nPopularise(stephanie, reid)\nWithstand(stephanie, reid)\nCalendered(reid) -> Withstand(reid, stephanie)\nforall x (Popularise(x, reid) and Withstand(x, reid) -> Withstand(reid, stephanie))\nforall x (Conjure(x, reid) -> Calendered(reid))\nforall x (Conjure(x, stephanie) and Withstand(stephanie, reid) -> Conjure(x, reid))\nforall x (Conjure(x, stephanie) and Popularise(stephanie, reid) -> Conjure(x, reid))\nConjure(stephanie, reid) -> Calendered(stephanie)\nRaftered(reid) -> Conjure(reid, stephanie)\nforall x (Calendered(x) and Conjure(x, reid) -> not Withstand(x, reid))\n\nnot Popularise(reid, reid)\n\nnot Popularise(reid, reid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "The aubrette snog the beatriz. The aubrette is hastate. The aubrette is unstained. The aubrette is alkalotic. The aubrette is declared. The aubrette is mangled. The aubrette does not like the beatriz. The aubrette denitrify the beatriz. The beatriz does not eat the aubrette. The beatriz is hastate. The beatriz is unstained. The beatriz is declared. The beatriz is mangled. The beatriz engross the aubrette. The beatriz denitrify the aubrette. If the aubrette is hastate then the aubrette denitrify the beatriz. If someone engross the aubrette and they see the aubrette then the aubrette denitrify the beatriz. If someone snog the aubrette then the aubrette is hastate. If someone snog the beatriz and the beatriz denitrify the aubrette then they eat the aubrette. If someone snog the beatriz and the beatriz engross the aubrette then they eat the aubrette. If the beatriz snog the aubrette then the beatriz is hastate. If the aubrette is unstained then the aubrette snog the beatriz. If someone is hastate and they eat the aubrette then they do not see the aubrette. The beatriz engross the beatriz.", "logic": "\nSnog(aubrette, beatriz)\nHastate(aubrette)\nUnstained(aubrette)\nAlkalotic(aubrette)\nDeclared(aubrette)\nMangled(aubrette)\nnot Engross(aubrette, beatriz)\nDenitrify(aubrette, beatriz)\nnot Snog(beatriz, aubrette)\nHastate(beatriz)\nUnstained(beatriz)\nDeclared(beatriz)\nMangled(beatriz)\nEngross(beatriz, aubrette)\nDenitrify(beatriz, aubrette)\nHastate(aubrette) -> Denitrify(aubrette, beatriz)\nforall x (Engross(x, aubrette) and Denitrify(x, aubrette) -> Denitrify(aubrette, beatriz))\nforall x (Snog(x, aubrette) -> Hastate(aubrette))\nforall x (Snog(x, beatriz) and Denitrify(beatriz, aubrette) -> Snog(x, aubrette))\nforall x (Snog(x, beatriz) and Engross(beatriz, aubrette) -> Snog(x, aubrette))\nSnog(beatriz, aubrette) -> Hastate(beatriz)\nUnstained(aubrette) -> Snog(aubrette, beatriz)\nforall x (Hastate(x) and Snog(x, aubrette) -> not Denitrify(x, aubrette))\n\nEngross(beatriz, beatriz)\n\nEngross(beatriz, beatriz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1815"} {"premises": "Gennie is pillared. Silvio is moronic. Myranda is not caring. If someone is moronic and antitypic then they are pillared. Cold people are pillared. If Silvio is pillared then Silvio is not antitypic. If someone is sheeny then they are herbaceous. If Silvio is not antitypic then Silvio is herbaceous. If someone is herbaceous then they are sheeny. Gennie is pillared.", "logic": "\nPillared(gennie)\nMoronic(silvio)\nnot Caring(myranda)\nforall x (Moronic(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Moronic(x) -> Pillared(x))\nPillared(silvio) -> not Antitypic(silvio)\nforall x (Sheeny(x) -> Herbaceous(x))\nnot Antitypic(silvio) -> Herbaceous(silvio)\nforall x (Herbaceous(x) -> Sheeny(x))\n\nPillared(gennie)\n\ntherefore Pillared(gennie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Malinda is indelicate. Rufe is scheming. Kelley is not abrasive. If someone is scheming and emerging then they are indelicate. Cold people are indelicate. If Rufe is indelicate then Rufe is not emerging. If someone is furnished then they are circinate. If Rufe is not emerging then Rufe is circinate. If someone is circinate then they are furnished. Kelley is abrasive.", "logic": "\nIndelicate(malinda)\nScheming(rufe)\nnot Abrasive(kelley)\nforall x (Scheming(x) and Emerging(x) -> Indelicate(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) -> Indelicate(x))\nIndelicate(rufe) -> not Emerging(rufe)\nforall x (Furnished(x) -> Circinate(x))\nnot Emerging(rufe) -> Circinate(rufe)\nforall x (Circinate(x) -> Furnished(x))\n\nAbrasive(kelley)\n\ntherefore not Abrasive(kelley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Andri is planetary. Baillie is cancelled. Vicki is not laurelled. If someone is cancelled and tensile then they are planetary. Cold people are planetary. If Baillie is planetary then Baillie is not tensile. If someone is vengeful then they are unladylike. If Baillie is not tensile then Baillie is unladylike. If someone is unladylike then they are vengeful. Baillie is planetary.", "logic": "\nPlanetary(andri)\nCancelled(baillie)\nnot Laurelled(vicki)\nforall x (Cancelled(x) and Tensile(x) -> Planetary(x))\nforall x (Cancelled(x) -> Planetary(x))\nPlanetary(baillie) -> not Tensile(baillie)\nforall x (Vengeful(x) -> Unladylike(x))\nnot Tensile(baillie) -> Unladylike(baillie)\nforall x (Unladylike(x) -> Vengeful(x))\n\nPlanetary(baillie)\n\nCancelled(baillie) and forall x (Cancelled(x) -> Planetary(x)) -> therefore Planetary(baillie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Laura is understood. Fionnula is adequate. Corinne is not juristic. If someone is adequate and adjustive then they are understood. Cold people are understood. If Fionnula is understood then Fionnula is not adjustive. If someone is eightfold then they are cogged. If Fionnula is not adjustive then Fionnula is cogged. If someone is cogged then they are eightfold. Fionnula is not understood.", "logic": "\nUnderstood(laura)\nAdequate(fionnula)\nnot Juristic(corinne)\nforall x (Adequate(x) and Adjustive(x) -> Understood(x))\nforall x (Adequate(x) -> Understood(x))\nUnderstood(fionnula) -> not Adjustive(fionnula)\nforall x (Eightfold(x) -> Cogged(x))\nnot Adjustive(fionnula) -> Cogged(fionnula)\nforall x (Cogged(x) -> Eightfold(x))\n\nnot Understood(fionnula)\n\nAdequate(fionnula) and forall x (Adequate(x) -> Understood(x)) -> therefore Understood(fionnula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Diane is bubaline. Cyndi is inwrought. Sonni is not pharisaic. If someone is inwrought and myopic then they are bubaline. Cold people are bubaline. If Cyndi is bubaline then Cyndi is not myopic. If someone is accursed then they are unbarreled. If Cyndi is not myopic then Cyndi is unbarreled. If someone is unbarreled then they are accursed. Cyndi is not myopic.", "logic": "\nBubaline(diane)\nInwrought(cyndi)\nnot Pharisaic(sonni)\nforall x (Inwrought(x) and Myopic(x) -> Bubaline(x))\nforall x (Inwrought(x) -> Bubaline(x))\nBubaline(cyndi) -> not Myopic(cyndi)\nforall x (Accursed(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\nnot Myopic(cyndi) -> Unbarreled(cyndi)\nforall x (Unbarreled(x) -> Accursed(x))\n\nnot Myopic(cyndi)\n\nInwrought(cyndi) and forall x (Inwrought(x) -> Bubaline(x)) -> therefore Bubaline(cyndi) Bubaline(cyndi) and Bubaline(cyndi) -> not Myopic(cyndi) -> therefore not Myopic(cyndi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Reina is carefree. Mischa is telephonic. Wilow is not partible. If someone is telephonic and roasted then they are carefree. Cold people are carefree. If Mischa is carefree then Mischa is not roasted. If someone is habitable then they are back. If Mischa is not roasted then Mischa is back. If someone is back then they are habitable. Mischa is roasted.", "logic": "\nCarefree(reina)\nTelephonic(mischa)\nnot Partible(wilow)\nforall x (Telephonic(x) and Roasted(x) -> Carefree(x))\nforall x (Telephonic(x) -> Carefree(x))\nCarefree(mischa) -> not Roasted(mischa)\nforall x (Habitable(x) -> Back(x))\nnot Roasted(mischa) -> Back(mischa)\nforall x (Back(x) -> Habitable(x))\n\nRoasted(mischa)\n\nTelephonic(mischa) and forall x (Telephonic(x) -> Carefree(x)) -> therefore Carefree(mischa) Carefree(mischa) and Carefree(mischa) -> not Roasted(mischa) -> therefore not Roasted(mischa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Murray is dissilient. Adey is filial. Lynnell is not radio. If someone is filial and uninviting then they are dissilient. Cold people are dissilient. If Adey is dissilient then Adey is not uninviting. If someone is nonexempt then they are whitened. If Adey is not uninviting then Adey is whitened. If someone is whitened then they are nonexempt. Adey is whitened.", "logic": "\nDissilient(murray)\nFilial(adey)\nnot Radio(lynnell)\nforall x (Filial(x) and Uninviting(x) -> Dissilient(x))\nforall x (Filial(x) -> Dissilient(x))\nDissilient(adey) -> not Uninviting(adey)\nforall x (Nonexempt(x) -> Whitened(x))\nnot Uninviting(adey) -> Whitened(adey)\nforall x (Whitened(x) -> Nonexempt(x))\n\nWhitened(adey)\n\nFilial(adey) and forall x (Filial(x) -> Dissilient(x)) -> therefore Dissilient(adey) Dissilient(adey) and Dissilient(adey) -> not Uninviting(adey) -> therefore not Uninviting(adey) not Uninviting(adey) and not Uninviting(adey) -> Whitened(adey) -> therefore Whitened(adey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Wilburt is masted. Joselyn is hindering. Cybel is not unripe. If someone is hindering and ironclad then they are masted. Cold people are masted. If Joselyn is masted then Joselyn is not ironclad. If someone is zippy then they are nodulated. If Joselyn is not ironclad then Joselyn is nodulated. If someone is nodulated then they are zippy. Joselyn is not nodulated.", "logic": "\nMasted(wilburt)\nHindering(joselyn)\nnot Unripe(cybel)\nforall x (Hindering(x) and Ironclad(x) -> Masted(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Masted(x))\nMasted(joselyn) -> not Ironclad(joselyn)\nforall x (Zippy(x) -> Nodulated(x))\nnot Ironclad(joselyn) -> Nodulated(joselyn)\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Zippy(x))\n\nnot Nodulated(joselyn)\n\nHindering(joselyn) and forall x (Hindering(x) -> Masted(x)) -> therefore Masted(joselyn) Masted(joselyn) and Masted(joselyn) -> not Ironclad(joselyn) -> therefore not Ironclad(joselyn) not Ironclad(joselyn) and not Ironclad(joselyn) -> Nodulated(joselyn) -> therefore Nodulated(joselyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Seymour is inside. Murielle is codified. Oren is not encouraged. If someone is codified and unworthy then they are inside. Cold people are inside. If Murielle is inside then Murielle is not unworthy. If someone is steamy then they are overripe. If Murielle is not unworthy then Murielle is overripe. If someone is overripe then they are steamy. Seymour is not steamy.", "logic": "\nInside(seymour)\nCodified(murielle)\nnot Encouraged(oren)\nforall x (Codified(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Inside(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Inside(x))\nInside(murielle) -> not Unworthy(murielle)\nforall x (Steamy(x) -> Overripe(x))\nnot Unworthy(murielle) -> Overripe(murielle)\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Steamy(x))\n\nnot Steamy(seymour)\n\nforall x (Overripe(x) -> Steamy(x)) <- forall x (Steamy(x) -> Overripe(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Nicoli is gregarious. Merill is inbred. Enid is not operant. If someone is inbred and imminent then they are gregarious. Cold people are gregarious. If Merill is gregarious then Merill is not imminent. If someone is thoughtful then they are utmost. If Merill is not imminent then Merill is utmost. If someone is utmost then they are thoughtful. Enid is thoughtful.", "logic": "\nGregarious(nicoli)\nInbred(merill)\nnot Operant(enid)\nforall x (Inbred(x) and Imminent(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Inbred(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nGregarious(merill) -> not Imminent(merill)\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) -> Utmost(x))\nnot Imminent(merill) -> Utmost(merill)\nforall x (Utmost(x) -> Thoughtful(x))\n\nThoughtful(enid)\n\nforall x (Utmost(x) -> Thoughtful(x)) <- forall x (Thoughtful(x) -> Utmost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Marillin is squishy. Graeme is hallowed. Ulick is not aphasic. If someone is hallowed and surmounted then they are squishy. Cold people are squishy. If Graeme is squishy then Graeme is not surmounted. If someone is strung then they are dozen. If Graeme is not surmounted then Graeme is dozen. If someone is dozen then they are strung. Marillin is not dozen.", "logic": "\nSquishy(marillin)\nHallowed(graeme)\nnot Aphasic(ulick)\nforall x (Hallowed(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Squishy(x))\nforall x (Hallowed(x) -> Squishy(x))\nSquishy(graeme) -> not Surmounted(graeme)\nforall x (Strung(x) -> Dozen(x))\nnot Surmounted(graeme) -> Dozen(graeme)\nforall x (Dozen(x) -> Strung(x))\n\nnot Dozen(marillin)\n\nforall x (Strung(x) -> Dozen(x)) <- forall x (Dozen(x) -> Strung(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Towny is tutelary. Zorina is bifocal. Stacy is not bone. If someone is bifocal and ostensive then they are tutelary. Cold people are tutelary. If Zorina is tutelary then Zorina is not ostensive. If someone is purging then they are nonliteral. If Zorina is not ostensive then Zorina is nonliteral. If someone is nonliteral then they are purging. Stacy is tutelary.", "logic": "\nTutelary(towny)\nBifocal(zorina)\nnot Bone(stacy)\nforall x (Bifocal(x) and Ostensive(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Bifocal(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nTutelary(zorina) -> not Ostensive(zorina)\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Nonliteral(x))\nnot Ostensive(zorina) -> Nonliteral(zorina)\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Purging(x))\n\nTutelary(stacy)\n\nforall x (Bifocal(x) and Ostensive(x) -> Tutelary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Jessalyn is cerebellar. Marina is aeschylean. Allan is not dyspneal. If someone is aeschylean and deist then they are cerebellar. Cold people are cerebellar. If Marina is cerebellar then Marina is not deist. If someone is exoergic then they are reclusive. If Marina is not deist then Marina is reclusive. If someone is reclusive then they are exoergic. Jessalyn is not red.", "logic": "\nCerebellar(jessalyn)\nAeschylean(marina)\nnot Dyspneal(allan)\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) and Deist(x) -> Cerebellar(x))\nforall x (Aeschylean(x) -> Cerebellar(x))\nCerebellar(marina) -> not Deist(marina)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nnot Deist(marina) -> Reclusive(marina)\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Exoergic(x))\n\nnot Red(jessalyn)\n\nnot Red(jessalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Sophi is vascular. Dacie is anorectic. Kelsi is not frontal. If someone is anorectic and plumping then they are vascular. Cold people are vascular. If Dacie is vascular then Dacie is not plumping. If someone is fascistic then they are canted. If Dacie is not plumping then Dacie is canted. If someone is canted then they are fascistic. Dacie is frontal.", "logic": "\nVascular(sophi)\nAnorectic(dacie)\nnot Frontal(kelsi)\nforall x (Anorectic(x) and Plumping(x) -> Vascular(x))\nforall x (Anorectic(x) -> Vascular(x))\nVascular(dacie) -> not Plumping(dacie)\nforall x (Fascistic(x) -> Canted(x))\nnot Plumping(dacie) -> Canted(dacie)\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Fascistic(x))\n\nFrontal(dacie)\n\nFrontal(dacie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Stephanie is statant. Margareta is utterable. Avivah is not noteworthy. If someone is utterable and explicit then they are statant. Cold people are statant. If Margareta is statant then Margareta is not explicit. If someone is profane then they are italian. If Margareta is not explicit then Margareta is italian. If someone is italian then they are profane. Avivah is not utterable.", "logic": "\nStatant(stephanie)\nUtterable(margareta)\nnot Noteworthy(avivah)\nforall x (Utterable(x) and Explicit(x) -> Statant(x))\nforall x (Utterable(x) -> Statant(x))\nStatant(margareta) -> not Explicit(margareta)\nforall x (Profane(x) -> Italian(x))\nnot Explicit(margareta) -> Italian(margareta)\nforall x (Italian(x) -> Profane(x))\n\nnot Utterable(avivah)\n\nnot Utterable(avivah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "Quinn is unquiet. Vannie is ectodermal. Codie is not identified. If someone is ectodermal and squishy then they are unquiet. Cold people are unquiet. If Vannie is unquiet then Vannie is not squishy. If someone is allotted then they are junoesque. If Vannie is not squishy then Vannie is junoesque. If someone is junoesque then they are allotted. Quinn is squishy.", "logic": "\nUnquiet(quinn)\nEctodermal(vannie)\nnot Identified(codie)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) and Squishy(x) -> Unquiet(x))\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) -> Unquiet(x))\nUnquiet(vannie) -> not Squishy(vannie)\nforall x (Allotted(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nnot Squishy(vannie) -> Junoesque(vannie)\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Allotted(x))\n\nSquishy(quinn)\n\nSquishy(quinn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-700"} {"premises": "The broddie is neurologic. The broddie detain the shandy. The harmonie snowball the broddie. The harmonie snowball the shandy. The harmonie is preteen. The harmonie is erstwhile. The harmonie is neurologic. The harmonie is inculpable. The harmonie detain the broddie. The harmonie detain the shandy. The harmonie qualify the broddie. The harmonie qualify the shandy. The shandy snowball the broddie. The shandy is preteen. The shandy is unclipped. If someone qualify the harmonie then the harmonie detain the broddie. If someone detain the shandy then the shandy snowball the harmonie. If someone snowball the harmonie then they are erstwhile. If someone qualify the broddie then the broddie qualify the shandy. If someone is neurologic and they visit the shandy then they eat the harmonie. If someone snowball the shandy then they see the shandy. The harmonie detain the shandy.", "logic": "\nNeurologic(broddie)\nDetain(broddie, shandy)\nSnowball(harmonie, broddie)\nSnowball(harmonie, shandy)\nPreteen(harmonie)\nErstwhile(harmonie)\nNeurologic(harmonie)\nInculpable(harmonie)\nDetain(harmonie, broddie)\nDetain(harmonie, shandy)\nQualify(harmonie, broddie)\nQualify(harmonie, shandy)\nSnowball(shandy, broddie)\nPreteen(shandy)\nUnclipped(shandy)\nforall x (Qualify(x, harmonie) -> Detain(harmonie, broddie))\nforall x (Detain(x, shandy) -> Snowball(shandy, harmonie))\nforall x (Snowball(x, harmonie) -> Erstwhile(x))\nforall x (Qualify(x, broddie) -> Qualify(broddie, shandy))\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Qualify(x, shandy) -> Snowball(x, harmonie))\nforall x (Snowball(x, shandy) -> Detain(x, shandy))\n\nDetain(harmonie, shandy)\n\ntherefore Detain(harmonie, shandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The aeriel is unmapped. The aeriel clout the rafaelita. The bernard prompt the aeriel. The bernard prompt the rafaelita. The bernard is advertised. The bernard is crustal. The bernard is unmapped. The bernard is bushy. The bernard clout the aeriel. The bernard clout the rafaelita. The bernard rally the aeriel. The bernard rally the rafaelita. The rafaelita prompt the aeriel. The rafaelita is advertised. The rafaelita is shut. If someone rally the bernard then the bernard clout the aeriel. If someone clout the rafaelita then the rafaelita prompt the bernard. If someone prompt the bernard then they are crustal. If someone rally the aeriel then the aeriel rally the rafaelita. If someone is unmapped and they visit the rafaelita then they eat the bernard. If someone prompt the rafaelita then they see the rafaelita. The bernard is not crustal.", "logic": "\nUnmapped(aeriel)\nClout(aeriel, rafaelita)\nPrompt(bernard, aeriel)\nPrompt(bernard, rafaelita)\nAdvertised(bernard)\nCrustal(bernard)\nUnmapped(bernard)\nBushy(bernard)\nClout(bernard, aeriel)\nClout(bernard, rafaelita)\nRally(bernard, aeriel)\nRally(bernard, rafaelita)\nPrompt(rafaelita, aeriel)\nAdvertised(rafaelita)\nShut(rafaelita)\nforall x (Rally(x, bernard) -> Clout(bernard, aeriel))\nforall x (Clout(x, rafaelita) -> Prompt(rafaelita, bernard))\nforall x (Prompt(x, bernard) -> Crustal(x))\nforall x (Rally(x, aeriel) -> Rally(aeriel, rafaelita))\nforall x (Unmapped(x) and Rally(x, rafaelita) -> Prompt(x, bernard))\nforall x (Prompt(x, rafaelita) -> Clout(x, rafaelita))\n\nnot Crustal(bernard)\n\ntherefore Crustal(bernard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The dyna is autarkical. The dyna westernize the charlene. The jay winterize the dyna. The jay winterize the charlene. The jay is fore. The jay is unsavoury. The jay is autarkical. The jay is isomeric. The jay westernize the dyna. The jay westernize the charlene. The jay bespangle the dyna. The jay bespangle the charlene. The charlene winterize the dyna. The charlene is fore. The charlene is elongated. If someone bespangle the jay then the jay westernize the dyna. If someone westernize the charlene then the charlene winterize the jay. If someone winterize the jay then they are unsavoury. If someone bespangle the dyna then the dyna bespangle the charlene. If someone is autarkical and they visit the charlene then they eat the jay. If someone winterize the charlene then they see the charlene. The dyna bespangle the charlene.", "logic": "\nAutarkical(dyna)\nWesternize(dyna, charlene)\nWinterize(jay, dyna)\nWinterize(jay, charlene)\nFore(jay)\nUnsavoury(jay)\nAutarkical(jay)\nIsomeric(jay)\nWesternize(jay, dyna)\nWesternize(jay, charlene)\nBespangle(jay, dyna)\nBespangle(jay, charlene)\nWinterize(charlene, dyna)\nFore(charlene)\nElongated(charlene)\nforall x (Bespangle(x, jay) -> Westernize(jay, dyna))\nforall x (Westernize(x, charlene) -> Winterize(charlene, jay))\nforall x (Winterize(x, jay) -> Unsavoury(x))\nforall x (Bespangle(x, dyna) -> Bespangle(dyna, charlene))\nforall x (Autarkical(x) and Bespangle(x, charlene) -> Winterize(x, jay))\nforall x (Winterize(x, charlene) -> Westernize(x, charlene))\n\nBespangle(dyna, charlene)\n\nBespangle(jay, dyna) and forall x (Bespangle(x, dyna) -> Bespangle(dyna, charlene)) -> therefore Bespangle(dyna, charlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The sib is mobile. The sib invite the schroeder. The roberto revitalize the sib. The roberto revitalize the schroeder. The roberto is damned. The roberto is greenish. The roberto is mobile. The roberto is javanese. The roberto invite the sib. The roberto invite the schroeder. The roberto flee the sib. The roberto flee the schroeder. The schroeder revitalize the sib. The schroeder is damned. The schroeder is shinto. If someone flee the roberto then the roberto invite the sib. If someone invite the schroeder then the schroeder revitalize the roberto. If someone revitalize the roberto then they are greenish. If someone flee the sib then the sib flee the schroeder. If someone is mobile and they visit the schroeder then they eat the roberto. If someone revitalize the schroeder then they see the schroeder. The sib does not visit the schroeder.", "logic": "\nMobile(sib)\nInvite(sib, schroeder)\nRevitalize(roberto, sib)\nRevitalize(roberto, schroeder)\nDamned(roberto)\nGreenish(roberto)\nMobile(roberto)\nJavanese(roberto)\nInvite(roberto, sib)\nInvite(roberto, schroeder)\nFlee(roberto, sib)\nFlee(roberto, schroeder)\nRevitalize(schroeder, sib)\nDamned(schroeder)\nShinto(schroeder)\nforall x (Flee(x, roberto) -> Invite(roberto, sib))\nforall x (Invite(x, schroeder) -> Revitalize(schroeder, roberto))\nforall x (Revitalize(x, roberto) -> Greenish(x))\nforall x (Flee(x, sib) -> Flee(sib, schroeder))\nforall x (Mobile(x) and Flee(x, schroeder) -> Revitalize(x, roberto))\nforall x (Revitalize(x, schroeder) -> Invite(x, schroeder))\n\nnot Flee(sib, schroeder)\n\nFlee(roberto, sib) and forall x (Flee(x, sib) -> Flee(sib, schroeder)) -> therefore Flee(sib, schroeder)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The ilysa is anesthetic. The ilysa forgather the jeannie. The tove rain the ilysa. The tove rain the jeannie. The tove is valid. The tove is appointive. The tove is anesthetic. The tove is about. The tove forgather the ilysa. The tove forgather the jeannie. The tove putt the ilysa. The tove putt the jeannie. The jeannie rain the ilysa. The jeannie is valid. The jeannie is barreled. If someone putt the tove then the tove forgather the ilysa. If someone forgather the jeannie then the jeannie rain the tove. If someone rain the tove then they are appointive. If someone putt the ilysa then the ilysa putt the jeannie. If someone is anesthetic and they visit the jeannie then they eat the tove. If someone rain the jeannie then they see the jeannie. The jeannie is appointive.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(ilysa)\nForgather(ilysa, jeannie)\nRain(tove, ilysa)\nRain(tove, jeannie)\nValid(tove)\nAppointive(tove)\nAnesthetic(tove)\nAbout(tove)\nForgather(tove, ilysa)\nForgather(tove, jeannie)\nPutt(tove, ilysa)\nPutt(tove, jeannie)\nRain(jeannie, ilysa)\nValid(jeannie)\nBarreled(jeannie)\nforall x (Putt(x, tove) -> Forgather(tove, ilysa))\nforall x (Forgather(x, jeannie) -> Rain(jeannie, tove))\nforall x (Rain(x, tove) -> Appointive(x))\nforall x (Putt(x, ilysa) -> Putt(ilysa, jeannie))\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) and Putt(x, jeannie) -> Rain(x, tove))\nforall x (Rain(x, jeannie) -> Forgather(x, jeannie))\n\nAppointive(jeannie)\n\nForgather(tove, jeannie) and forall x (Forgather(x, jeannie) -> Rain(jeannie, tove)) -> therefore Rain(jeannie, tove) Rain(jeannie, tove) and forall x (Rain(x, tove) -> Appointive(x)) -> therefore Appointive(jeannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The ruddy is amazing. The ruddy desecrate the phip. The jenine drop the ruddy. The jenine drop the phip. The jenine is rhythmic. The jenine is unreduced. The jenine is amazing. The jenine is xliii. The jenine desecrate the ruddy. The jenine desecrate the phip. The jenine retain the ruddy. The jenine retain the phip. The phip drop the ruddy. The phip is rhythmic. The phip is accusative. If someone retain the jenine then the jenine desecrate the ruddy. If someone desecrate the phip then the phip drop the jenine. If someone drop the jenine then they are unreduced. If someone retain the ruddy then the ruddy retain the phip. If someone is amazing and they visit the phip then they eat the jenine. If someone drop the phip then they see the phip. The ruddy does not eat the jenine.", "logic": "\nAmazing(ruddy)\nDesecrate(ruddy, phip)\nDrop(jenine, ruddy)\nDrop(jenine, phip)\nRhythmic(jenine)\nUnreduced(jenine)\nAmazing(jenine)\nXliii(jenine)\nDesecrate(jenine, ruddy)\nDesecrate(jenine, phip)\nRetain(jenine, ruddy)\nRetain(jenine, phip)\nDrop(phip, ruddy)\nRhythmic(phip)\nAccusative(phip)\nforall x (Retain(x, jenine) -> Desecrate(jenine, ruddy))\nforall x (Desecrate(x, phip) -> Drop(phip, jenine))\nforall x (Drop(x, jenine) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Retain(x, ruddy) -> Retain(ruddy, phip))\nforall x (Amazing(x) and Retain(x, phip) -> Drop(x, jenine))\nforall x (Drop(x, phip) -> Desecrate(x, phip))\n\nnot Drop(ruddy, jenine)\n\nRetain(jenine, ruddy) and forall x (Retain(x, ruddy) -> Retain(ruddy, phip)) -> therefore Retain(ruddy, phip) Amazing(ruddy) and Retain(ruddy, phip) and forall x (Amazing(x) and Retain(x, phip) -> Drop(x, jenine)) -> therefore Drop(ruddy, jenine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The diann is enticing. The diann misalign the cal. The inna iodinate the diann. The inna iodinate the cal. The inna is chopfallen. The inna is altaic. The inna is enticing. The inna is carnation. The inna misalign the diann. The inna misalign the cal. The inna sync the diann. The inna sync the cal. The cal iodinate the diann. The cal is chopfallen. The cal is waxy. If someone sync the inna then the inna misalign the diann. If someone misalign the cal then the cal iodinate the inna. If someone iodinate the inna then they are altaic. If someone sync the diann then the diann sync the cal. If someone is enticing and they visit the cal then they eat the inna. If someone iodinate the cal then they see the cal. The diann is altaic.", "logic": "\nEnticing(diann)\nMisalign(diann, cal)\nIodinate(inna, diann)\nIodinate(inna, cal)\nChopfallen(inna)\nAltaic(inna)\nEnticing(inna)\nCarnation(inna)\nMisalign(inna, diann)\nMisalign(inna, cal)\nSync(inna, diann)\nSync(inna, cal)\nIodinate(cal, diann)\nChopfallen(cal)\nWaxy(cal)\nforall x (Sync(x, inna) -> Misalign(inna, diann))\nforall x (Misalign(x, cal) -> Iodinate(cal, inna))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, inna) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Sync(x, diann) -> Sync(diann, cal))\nforall x (Enticing(x) and Sync(x, cal) -> Iodinate(x, inna))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, cal) -> Misalign(x, cal))\n\nAltaic(diann)\n\nSync(inna, diann) and forall x (Sync(x, diann) -> Sync(diann, cal)) -> therefore Sync(diann, cal) Enticing(diann) and Sync(diann, cal) and forall x (Enticing(x) and Sync(x, cal) -> Iodinate(x, inna)) -> therefore Iodinate(diann, inna) Iodinate(diann, inna) and forall x (Iodinate(x, inna) -> Altaic(x)) -> therefore Altaic(diann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The emmey is struggling. The emmey roleplay the ricca. The rosalynd overspend the emmey. The rosalynd overspend the ricca. The rosalynd is meshuga. The rosalynd is leechlike. The rosalynd is struggling. The rosalynd is dormant. The rosalynd roleplay the emmey. The rosalynd roleplay the ricca. The rosalynd winkle the emmey. The rosalynd winkle the ricca. The ricca overspend the emmey. The ricca is meshuga. The ricca is despicable. If someone winkle the rosalynd then the rosalynd roleplay the emmey. If someone roleplay the ricca then the ricca overspend the rosalynd. If someone overspend the rosalynd then they are leechlike. If someone winkle the emmey then the emmey winkle the ricca. If someone is struggling and they visit the ricca then they eat the rosalynd. If someone overspend the ricca then they see the ricca. The emmey is not leechlike.", "logic": "\nStruggling(emmey)\nRoleplay(emmey, ricca)\nOverspend(rosalynd, emmey)\nOverspend(rosalynd, ricca)\nMeshuga(rosalynd)\nLeechlike(rosalynd)\nStruggling(rosalynd)\nDormant(rosalynd)\nRoleplay(rosalynd, emmey)\nRoleplay(rosalynd, ricca)\nWinkle(rosalynd, emmey)\nWinkle(rosalynd, ricca)\nOverspend(ricca, emmey)\nMeshuga(ricca)\nDespicable(ricca)\nforall x (Winkle(x, rosalynd) -> Roleplay(rosalynd, emmey))\nforall x (Roleplay(x, ricca) -> Overspend(ricca, rosalynd))\nforall x (Overspend(x, rosalynd) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Winkle(x, emmey) -> Winkle(emmey, ricca))\nforall x (Struggling(x) and Winkle(x, ricca) -> Overspend(x, rosalynd))\nforall x (Overspend(x, ricca) -> Roleplay(x, ricca))\n\nnot Leechlike(emmey)\n\nWinkle(rosalynd, emmey) and forall x (Winkle(x, emmey) -> Winkle(emmey, ricca)) -> therefore Winkle(emmey, ricca) Struggling(emmey) and Winkle(emmey, ricca) and forall x (Struggling(x) and Winkle(x, ricca) -> Overspend(x, rosalynd)) -> therefore Overspend(emmey, rosalynd) Overspend(emmey, rosalynd) and forall x (Overspend(x, rosalynd) -> Leechlike(x)) -> therefore Leechlike(emmey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The cobbie is mesophytic. The cobbie thieve the clovis. The theda discount the cobbie. The theda discount the clovis. The theda is jerky. The theda is anticancer. The theda is mesophytic. The theda is sure. The theda thieve the cobbie. The theda thieve the clovis. The theda apologize the cobbie. The theda apologize the clovis. The clovis discount the cobbie. The clovis is jerky. The clovis is meshugga. If someone apologize the theda then the theda thieve the cobbie. If someone thieve the clovis then the clovis discount the theda. If someone discount the theda then they are anticancer. If someone apologize the cobbie then the cobbie apologize the clovis. If someone is mesophytic and they visit the clovis then they eat the theda. If someone discount the clovis then they see the clovis. The clovis does not see the clovis.", "logic": "\nMesophytic(cobbie)\nThieve(cobbie, clovis)\nDiscount(theda, cobbie)\nDiscount(theda, clovis)\nJerky(theda)\nAnticancer(theda)\nMesophytic(theda)\nSure(theda)\nThieve(theda, cobbie)\nThieve(theda, clovis)\nApologize(theda, cobbie)\nApologize(theda, clovis)\nDiscount(clovis, cobbie)\nJerky(clovis)\nMeshugga(clovis)\nforall x (Apologize(x, theda) -> Thieve(theda, cobbie))\nforall x (Thieve(x, clovis) -> Discount(clovis, theda))\nforall x (Discount(x, theda) -> Anticancer(x))\nforall x (Apologize(x, cobbie) -> Apologize(cobbie, clovis))\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) and Apologize(x, clovis) -> Discount(x, theda))\nforall x (Discount(x, clovis) -> Thieve(x, clovis))\n\nnot Thieve(clovis, clovis)\n\nforall x (Discount(x, clovis) -> Thieve(x, clovis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The ofilia is conjoined. The ofilia assist the harmonie. The marquita denounce the ofilia. The marquita denounce the harmonie. The marquita is wired. The marquita is recurved. The marquita is conjoined. The marquita is congestive. The marquita assist the ofilia. The marquita assist the harmonie. The marquita head the ofilia. The marquita head the harmonie. The harmonie denounce the ofilia. The harmonie is wired. The harmonie is impervious. If someone head the marquita then the marquita assist the ofilia. If someone assist the harmonie then the harmonie denounce the marquita. If someone denounce the marquita then they are recurved. If someone head the ofilia then the ofilia head the harmonie. If someone is conjoined and they visit the harmonie then they eat the marquita. If someone denounce the harmonie then they see the harmonie. The ofilia head the ofilia.", "logic": "\nConjoined(ofilia)\nAssist(ofilia, harmonie)\nDenounce(marquita, ofilia)\nDenounce(marquita, harmonie)\nWired(marquita)\nRecurved(marquita)\nConjoined(marquita)\nCongestive(marquita)\nAssist(marquita, ofilia)\nAssist(marquita, harmonie)\nHead(marquita, ofilia)\nHead(marquita, harmonie)\nDenounce(harmonie, ofilia)\nWired(harmonie)\nImpervious(harmonie)\nforall x (Head(x, marquita) -> Assist(marquita, ofilia))\nforall x (Assist(x, harmonie) -> Denounce(harmonie, marquita))\nforall x (Denounce(x, marquita) -> Recurved(x))\nforall x (Head(x, ofilia) -> Head(ofilia, harmonie))\nforall x (Conjoined(x) and Head(x, harmonie) -> Denounce(x, marquita))\nforall x (Denounce(x, harmonie) -> Assist(x, harmonie))\n\nHead(ofilia, ofilia)\n\nHead(ofilia, ofilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The eveline is alloyed. The eveline clarify the brianne. The bunny rebind the eveline. The bunny rebind the brianne. The bunny is huge. The bunny is unmusical. The bunny is alloyed. The bunny is cosmogenic. The bunny clarify the eveline. The bunny clarify the brianne. The bunny stylize the eveline. The bunny stylize the brianne. The brianne rebind the eveline. The brianne is huge. The brianne is harmonious. If someone stylize the bunny then the bunny clarify the eveline. If someone clarify the brianne then the brianne rebind the bunny. If someone rebind the bunny then they are unmusical. If someone stylize the eveline then the eveline stylize the brianne. If someone is alloyed and they visit the brianne then they eat the bunny. If someone rebind the brianne then they see the brianne. The eveline does not eat the brianne.", "logic": "\nAlloyed(eveline)\nClarify(eveline, brianne)\nRebind(bunny, eveline)\nRebind(bunny, brianne)\nHuge(bunny)\nUnmusical(bunny)\nAlloyed(bunny)\nCosmogenic(bunny)\nClarify(bunny, eveline)\nClarify(bunny, brianne)\nStylize(bunny, eveline)\nStylize(bunny, brianne)\nRebind(brianne, eveline)\nHuge(brianne)\nHarmonious(brianne)\nforall x (Stylize(x, bunny) -> Clarify(bunny, eveline))\nforall x (Clarify(x, brianne) -> Rebind(brianne, bunny))\nforall x (Rebind(x, bunny) -> Unmusical(x))\nforall x (Stylize(x, eveline) -> Stylize(eveline, brianne))\nforall x (Alloyed(x) and Stylize(x, brianne) -> Rebind(x, bunny))\nforall x (Rebind(x, brianne) -> Clarify(x, brianne))\n\nnot Rebind(eveline, brianne)\n\nnot Rebind(eveline, brianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The zelig is monogynous. The zelig malinger the kerrin. The crystie make the zelig. The crystie make the kerrin. The crystie is scopal. The crystie is impassable. The crystie is monogynous. The crystie is amusing. The crystie malinger the zelig. The crystie malinger the kerrin. The crystie lessen the zelig. The crystie lessen the kerrin. The kerrin make the zelig. The kerrin is scopal. The kerrin is adulatory. If someone lessen the crystie then the crystie malinger the zelig. If someone malinger the kerrin then the kerrin make the crystie. If someone make the crystie then they are impassable. If someone lessen the zelig then the zelig lessen the kerrin. If someone is monogynous and they visit the kerrin then they eat the crystie. If someone make the kerrin then they see the kerrin. The kerrin is monogynous.", "logic": "\nMonogynous(zelig)\nMalinger(zelig, kerrin)\nMake(crystie, zelig)\nMake(crystie, kerrin)\nScopal(crystie)\nImpassable(crystie)\nMonogynous(crystie)\nAmusing(crystie)\nMalinger(crystie, zelig)\nMalinger(crystie, kerrin)\nLessen(crystie, zelig)\nLessen(crystie, kerrin)\nMake(kerrin, zelig)\nScopal(kerrin)\nAdulatory(kerrin)\nforall x (Lessen(x, crystie) -> Malinger(crystie, zelig))\nforall x (Malinger(x, kerrin) -> Make(kerrin, crystie))\nforall x (Make(x, crystie) -> Impassable(x))\nforall x (Lessen(x, zelig) -> Lessen(zelig, kerrin))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) and Lessen(x, kerrin) -> Make(x, crystie))\nforall x (Make(x, kerrin) -> Malinger(x, kerrin))\n\nMonogynous(kerrin)\n\nMonogynous(kerrin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The gretchen is loquacious. The gretchen terrasse the jake. The ashely church the gretchen. The ashely church the jake. The ashely is ahead. The ashely is mortgaged. The ashely is loquacious. The ashely is pellucid. The ashely terrasse the gretchen. The ashely terrasse the jake. The ashely disprove the gretchen. The ashely disprove the jake. The jake church the gretchen. The jake is ahead. The jake is undatable. If someone disprove the ashely then the ashely terrasse the gretchen. If someone terrasse the jake then the jake church the ashely. If someone church the ashely then they are mortgaged. If someone disprove the gretchen then the gretchen disprove the jake. If someone is loquacious and they visit the jake then they eat the ashely. If someone church the jake then they see the jake. The ashely does not see the ashely.", "logic": "\nLoquacious(gretchen)\nTerrasse(gretchen, jake)\nChurch(ashely, gretchen)\nChurch(ashely, jake)\nAhead(ashely)\nMortgaged(ashely)\nLoquacious(ashely)\nPellucid(ashely)\nTerrasse(ashely, gretchen)\nTerrasse(ashely, jake)\nDisprove(ashely, gretchen)\nDisprove(ashely, jake)\nChurch(jake, gretchen)\nAhead(jake)\nUndatable(jake)\nforall x (Disprove(x, ashely) -> Terrasse(ashely, gretchen))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, jake) -> Church(jake, ashely))\nforall x (Church(x, ashely) -> Mortgaged(x))\nforall x (Disprove(x, gretchen) -> Disprove(gretchen, jake))\nforall x (Loquacious(x) and Disprove(x, jake) -> Church(x, ashely))\nforall x (Church(x, jake) -> Terrasse(x, jake))\n\nnot Terrasse(ashely, ashely)\n\nnot Terrasse(ashely, ashely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The eudora is endodontic. The eudora blunt the francisca. The shir founder the eudora. The shir founder the francisca. The shir is unartistic. The shir is spheric. The shir is endodontic. The shir is velar. The shir blunt the eudora. The shir blunt the francisca. The shir rush the eudora. The shir rush the francisca. The francisca founder the eudora. The francisca is unartistic. The francisca is celestial. If someone rush the shir then the shir blunt the eudora. If someone blunt the francisca then the francisca founder the shir. If someone founder the shir then they are spheric. If someone rush the eudora then the eudora rush the francisca. If someone is endodontic and they visit the francisca then they eat the shir. If someone founder the francisca then they see the francisca. The eudora is celestial.", "logic": "\nEndodontic(eudora)\nBlunt(eudora, francisca)\nFounder(shir, eudora)\nFounder(shir, francisca)\nUnartistic(shir)\nSpheric(shir)\nEndodontic(shir)\nVelar(shir)\nBlunt(shir, eudora)\nBlunt(shir, francisca)\nRush(shir, eudora)\nRush(shir, francisca)\nFounder(francisca, eudora)\nUnartistic(francisca)\nCelestial(francisca)\nforall x (Rush(x, shir) -> Blunt(shir, eudora))\nforall x (Blunt(x, francisca) -> Founder(francisca, shir))\nforall x (Founder(x, shir) -> Spheric(x))\nforall x (Rush(x, eudora) -> Rush(eudora, francisca))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) and Rush(x, francisca) -> Founder(x, shir))\nforall x (Founder(x, francisca) -> Blunt(x, francisca))\n\nCelestial(eudora)\n\nCelestial(eudora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The freemon is strait. The freemon peril the ernst. The judye undertake the freemon. The judye undertake the ernst. The judye is blaring. The judye is ireful. The judye is strait. The judye is sottish. The judye peril the freemon. The judye peril the ernst. The judye accent the freemon. The judye accent the ernst. The ernst undertake the freemon. The ernst is blaring. The ernst is resilient. If someone accent the judye then the judye peril the freemon. If someone peril the ernst then the ernst undertake the judye. If someone undertake the judye then they are ireful. If someone accent the freemon then the freemon accent the ernst. If someone is strait and they visit the ernst then they eat the judye. If someone undertake the ernst then they see the ernst. The freemon does not eat the freemon.", "logic": "\nStrait(freemon)\nPeril(freemon, ernst)\nUndertake(judye, freemon)\nUndertake(judye, ernst)\nBlaring(judye)\nIreful(judye)\nStrait(judye)\nSottish(judye)\nPeril(judye, freemon)\nPeril(judye, ernst)\nAccent(judye, freemon)\nAccent(judye, ernst)\nUndertake(ernst, freemon)\nBlaring(ernst)\nResilient(ernst)\nforall x (Accent(x, judye) -> Peril(judye, freemon))\nforall x (Peril(x, ernst) -> Undertake(ernst, judye))\nforall x (Undertake(x, judye) -> Ireful(x))\nforall x (Accent(x, freemon) -> Accent(freemon, ernst))\nforall x (Strait(x) and Accent(x, ernst) -> Undertake(x, judye))\nforall x (Undertake(x, ernst) -> Peril(x, ernst))\n\nnot Undertake(freemon, freemon)\n\nnot Undertake(freemon, freemon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "The rozalin is alchemical. The rozalin republish the lil. The cristy flambe the rozalin. The cristy flambe the lil. The cristy is curly. The cristy is avellane. The cristy is alchemical. The cristy is dipolar. The cristy republish the rozalin. The cristy republish the lil. The cristy desalinize the rozalin. The cristy desalinize the lil. The lil flambe the rozalin. The lil is curly. The lil is helical. If someone desalinize the cristy then the cristy republish the rozalin. If someone republish the lil then the lil flambe the cristy. If someone flambe the cristy then they are avellane. If someone desalinize the rozalin then the rozalin desalinize the lil. If someone is alchemical and they visit the lil then they eat the cristy. If someone flambe the lil then they see the lil. The lil desalinize the cristy.", "logic": "\nAlchemical(rozalin)\nRepublish(rozalin, lil)\nFlambe(cristy, rozalin)\nFlambe(cristy, lil)\nCurly(cristy)\nAvellane(cristy)\nAlchemical(cristy)\nDipolar(cristy)\nRepublish(cristy, rozalin)\nRepublish(cristy, lil)\nDesalinize(cristy, rozalin)\nDesalinize(cristy, lil)\nFlambe(lil, rozalin)\nCurly(lil)\nHelical(lil)\nforall x (Desalinize(x, cristy) -> Republish(cristy, rozalin))\nforall x (Republish(x, lil) -> Flambe(lil, cristy))\nforall x (Flambe(x, cristy) -> Avellane(x))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, rozalin) -> Desalinize(rozalin, lil))\nforall x (Alchemical(x) and Desalinize(x, lil) -> Flambe(x, cristy))\nforall x (Flambe(x, lil) -> Republish(x, lil))\n\nDesalinize(lil, cristy)\n\nDesalinize(lil, cristy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-257"} {"premises": "Eustace is pivotal. Eustace is fibrinous. Eustace is cancelled. All accentual, cancelled things are homocyclic. If something is pivotal and despotic then it is homocyclic. All mobile, cancelled things are fibrinous. If something is fibrinous and accentual then it is pivotal. If something is fibrinous then it is mobile. All mobile things are accentual. Big, mobile things are cancelled. If Eustace is accentual and Eustace is not fibrinous then Eustace is homocyclic. Eustace is fibrinous.", "logic": "\nPivotal(eustace)\nFibrinous(eustace)\nCancelled(eustace)\nforall x (Accentual(x) and Cancelled(x) -> Homocyclic(x))\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and Despotic(x) -> Homocyclic(x))\nforall x (Mobile(x) and Cancelled(x) -> Fibrinous(x))\nforall x (Fibrinous(x) and Accentual(x) -> Pivotal(x))\nforall x (Fibrinous(x) -> Mobile(x))\nforall x (Mobile(x) -> Accentual(x))\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and Mobile(x) -> Cancelled(x))\nAccentual(eustace) and not Fibrinous(eustace) -> Homocyclic(eustace)\n\nFibrinous(eustace)\n\ntherefore Fibrinous(eustace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Clemente is unattended. Clemente is alienating. Clemente is unhopeful. All czarist, unhopeful things are unexpected. If something is unattended and reasonable then it is unexpected. All inguinal, unhopeful things are alienating. If something is alienating and czarist then it is unattended. If something is alienating then it is inguinal. All inguinal things are czarist. Big, inguinal things are unhopeful. If Clemente is czarist and Clemente is not alienating then Clemente is unexpected. Clemente is not alienating.", "logic": "\nUnattended(clemente)\nAlienating(clemente)\nUnhopeful(clemente)\nforall x (Czarist(x) and Unhopeful(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Unattended(x) and Reasonable(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) and Unhopeful(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) and Czarist(x) -> Unattended(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) -> Inguinal(x))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Unattended(x) and Inguinal(x) -> Unhopeful(x))\nCzarist(clemente) and not Alienating(clemente) -> Unexpected(clemente)\n\nnot Alienating(clemente)\n\ntherefore Alienating(clemente)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Aurelea is olfactive. Aurelea is ugandan. Aurelea is turgid. All erectile, turgid things are mosstone. If something is olfactive and shuddery then it is mosstone. All unfilmed, turgid things are ugandan. If something is ugandan and erectile then it is olfactive. If something is ugandan then it is unfilmed. All unfilmed things are erectile. Big, unfilmed things are turgid. If Aurelea is erectile and Aurelea is not ugandan then Aurelea is mosstone. Aurelea is unfilmed.", "logic": "\nOlfactive(aurelea)\nUgandan(aurelea)\nTurgid(aurelea)\nforall x (Erectile(x) and Turgid(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Olfactive(x) and Shuddery(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) and Turgid(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) and Erectile(x) -> Olfactive(x))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Erectile(x))\nforall x (Olfactive(x) and Unfilmed(x) -> Turgid(x))\nErectile(aurelea) and not Ugandan(aurelea) -> Mosstone(aurelea)\n\nUnfilmed(aurelea)\n\nUgandan(aurelea) and forall x (Ugandan(x) -> Unfilmed(x)) -> therefore Unfilmed(aurelea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Abdullah is scheduled. Abdullah is birchen. Abdullah is judicious. All submissive, judicious things are content. If something is scheduled and apetalous then it is content. All carroty, judicious things are birchen. If something is birchen and submissive then it is scheduled. If something is birchen then it is carroty. All carroty things are submissive. Big, carroty things are judicious. If Abdullah is submissive and Abdullah is not birchen then Abdullah is content. Abdullah is not carroty.", "logic": "\nScheduled(abdullah)\nBirchen(abdullah)\nJudicious(abdullah)\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Judicious(x) -> Content(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) and Apetalous(x) -> Content(x))\nforall x (Carroty(x) and Judicious(x) -> Birchen(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) and Submissive(x) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) -> Carroty(x))\nforall x (Carroty(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) and Carroty(x) -> Judicious(x))\nSubmissive(abdullah) and not Birchen(abdullah) -> Content(abdullah)\n\nnot Carroty(abdullah)\n\nBirchen(abdullah) and forall x (Birchen(x) -> Carroty(x)) -> therefore Carroty(abdullah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Kaile is alterative. Kaile is palatal. Kaile is stodgy. All neurotic, stodgy things are decisive. If something is alterative and noxious then it is decisive. All consoling, stodgy things are palatal. If something is palatal and neurotic then it is alterative. If something is palatal then it is consoling. All consoling things are neurotic. Big, consoling things are stodgy. If Kaile is neurotic and Kaile is not palatal then Kaile is decisive. Kaile is neurotic.", "logic": "\nAlterative(kaile)\nPalatal(kaile)\nStodgy(kaile)\nforall x (Neurotic(x) and Stodgy(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Alterative(x) and Noxious(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Consoling(x) and Stodgy(x) -> Palatal(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) and Neurotic(x) -> Alterative(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> Consoling(x))\nforall x (Consoling(x) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Alterative(x) and Consoling(x) -> Stodgy(x))\nNeurotic(kaile) and not Palatal(kaile) -> Decisive(kaile)\n\nNeurotic(kaile)\n\nPalatal(kaile) and forall x (Palatal(x) -> Consoling(x)) -> therefore Consoling(kaile) Consoling(kaile) and forall x (Consoling(x) -> Neurotic(x)) -> therefore Neurotic(kaile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Hector is gingery. Hector is nonlethal. Hector is actinal. All unspaced, actinal things are lossless. If something is gingery and unreleased then it is lossless. All honeylike, actinal things are nonlethal. If something is nonlethal and unspaced then it is gingery. If something is nonlethal then it is honeylike. All honeylike things are unspaced. Big, honeylike things are actinal. If Hector is unspaced and Hector is not nonlethal then Hector is lossless. Hector is not unspaced.", "logic": "\nGingery(hector)\nNonlethal(hector)\nActinal(hector)\nforall x (Unspaced(x) and Actinal(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Gingery(x) and Unreleased(x) -> Lossless(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) and Actinal(x) -> Nonlethal(x))\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) and Unspaced(x) -> Gingery(x))\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nforall x (Gingery(x) and Honeylike(x) -> Actinal(x))\nUnspaced(hector) and not Nonlethal(hector) -> Lossless(hector)\n\nnot Unspaced(hector)\n\nNonlethal(hector) and forall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Honeylike(x)) -> therefore Honeylike(hector) Honeylike(hector) and forall x (Honeylike(x) -> Unspaced(x)) -> therefore Unspaced(hector)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Bobbi is hidebound. Bobbi is appetent. Bobbi is anal. All iliac, anal things are portly. If something is hidebound and coroneted then it is portly. All hopeless, anal things are appetent. If something is appetent and iliac then it is hidebound. If something is appetent then it is hopeless. All hopeless things are iliac. Big, hopeless things are anal. If Bobbi is iliac and Bobbi is not appetent then Bobbi is portly. Bobbi is portly.", "logic": "\nHidebound(bobbi)\nAppetent(bobbi)\nAnal(bobbi)\nforall x (Iliac(x) and Anal(x) -> Portly(x))\nforall x (Hidebound(x) and Coroneted(x) -> Portly(x))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) and Anal(x) -> Appetent(x))\nforall x (Appetent(x) and Iliac(x) -> Hidebound(x))\nforall x (Appetent(x) -> Hopeless(x))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) -> Iliac(x))\nforall x (Hidebound(x) and Hopeless(x) -> Anal(x))\nIliac(bobbi) and not Appetent(bobbi) -> Portly(bobbi)\n\nPortly(bobbi)\n\nAppetent(bobbi) and forall x (Appetent(x) -> Hopeless(x)) -> therefore Hopeless(bobbi) Hopeless(bobbi) and forall x (Hopeless(x) -> Iliac(x)) -> therefore Iliac(bobbi) Iliac(bobbi) and Anal(bobbi) and forall x (Iliac(x) and Anal(x) -> Portly(x)) -> therefore Portly(bobbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Wynn is merciless. Wynn is manic. Wynn is adjuvant. All cacuminal, adjuvant things are unblushing. If something is merciless and reformist then it is unblushing. All masted, adjuvant things are manic. If something is manic and cacuminal then it is merciless. If something is manic then it is masted. All masted things are cacuminal. Big, masted things are adjuvant. If Wynn is cacuminal and Wynn is not manic then Wynn is unblushing. Wynn is not unblushing.", "logic": "\nMerciless(wynn)\nManic(wynn)\nAdjuvant(wynn)\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Adjuvant(x) -> Unblushing(x))\nforall x (Merciless(x) and Reformist(x) -> Unblushing(x))\nforall x (Masted(x) and Adjuvant(x) -> Manic(x))\nforall x (Manic(x) and Cacuminal(x) -> Merciless(x))\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Masted(x))\nforall x (Masted(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Merciless(x) and Masted(x) -> Adjuvant(x))\nCacuminal(wynn) and not Manic(wynn) -> Unblushing(wynn)\n\nnot Unblushing(wynn)\n\nManic(wynn) and forall x (Manic(x) -> Masted(x)) -> therefore Masted(wynn) Masted(wynn) and forall x (Masted(x) -> Cacuminal(x)) -> therefore Cacuminal(wynn) Cacuminal(wynn) and Adjuvant(wynn) and forall x (Cacuminal(x) and Adjuvant(x) -> Unblushing(x)) -> therefore Unblushing(wynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1353"} {"premises": "Mildrid is adamant. Mildrid is burned. Mildrid is encouraged. All lactogenic people are encumbered. If someone is lactogenic then they are encumbered. All encumbered people are messianic. All lactogenic, adamant people are dialectal. All messianic, dialectal people are encouraged. If someone is adamant and encouraged then they are lactogenic. Mildrid is adamant.", "logic": "\nAdamant(mildrid)\nBurned(mildrid)\nEncouraged(mildrid)\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) -> Encumbered(x))\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) -> Encumbered(x))\nforall x (Encumbered(x) -> Messianic(x))\nforall x (Lactogenic(x) and Adamant(x) -> Dialectal(x))\nforall x (Messianic(x) and Dialectal(x) -> Encouraged(x))\nforall x (Adamant(x) and Encouraged(x) -> Lactogenic(x))\n\nAdamant(mildrid)\n\ntherefore Adamant(mildrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Waite is coaxal. Waite is loaded. Waite is shelflike. All vaporous people are aspirant. If someone is vaporous then they are aspirant. All aspirant people are scrub. All vaporous, coaxal people are divisional. All scrub, divisional people are shelflike. If someone is coaxal and shelflike then they are vaporous. Waite is not shelflike.", "logic": "\nCoaxal(waite)\nLoaded(waite)\nShelflike(waite)\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Aspirant(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) -> Aspirant(x))\nforall x (Aspirant(x) -> Scrub(x))\nforall x (Vaporous(x) and Coaxal(x) -> Divisional(x))\nforall x (Scrub(x) and Divisional(x) -> Shelflike(x))\nforall x (Coaxal(x) and Shelflike(x) -> Vaporous(x))\n\nnot Shelflike(waite)\n\ntherefore Shelflike(waite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Tynan is dyspnoeic. Tynan is unplanned. Tynan is heatless. All unruffled people are jesuit. If someone is unruffled then they are jesuit. All jesuit people are muciferous. All unruffled, dyspnoeic people are shouldered. All muciferous, shouldered people are heatless. If someone is dyspnoeic and heatless then they are unruffled. Tynan is unruffled.", "logic": "\nDyspnoeic(tynan)\nUnplanned(tynan)\nHeatless(tynan)\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) and Dyspnoeic(x) -> Shouldered(x))\nforall x (Muciferous(x) and Shouldered(x) -> Heatless(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and Heatless(x) -> Unruffled(x))\n\nUnruffled(tynan)\n\nDyspnoeic(tynan) and Heatless(tynan) and forall x (Dyspnoeic(x) and Heatless(x) -> Unruffled(x)) -> therefore Unruffled(tynan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Margo is picky. Margo is rococo. Margo is cryptical. All downstream people are spoilable. If someone is downstream then they are spoilable. All spoilable people are saxicoline. All downstream, picky people are moonstruck. All saxicoline, moonstruck people are cryptical. If someone is picky and cryptical then they are downstream. Margo is not downstream.", "logic": "\nPicky(margo)\nRococo(margo)\nCryptical(margo)\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Downstream(x) -> Spoilable(x))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nforall x (Downstream(x) and Picky(x) -> Moonstruck(x))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) and Moonstruck(x) -> Cryptical(x))\nforall x (Picky(x) and Cryptical(x) -> Downstream(x))\n\nnot Downstream(margo)\n\nPicky(margo) and Cryptical(margo) and forall x (Picky(x) and Cryptical(x) -> Downstream(x)) -> therefore Downstream(margo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Orbadiah is idyllic. Orbadiah is scatty. Orbadiah is overage. All discreet people are lighted. If someone is discreet then they are lighted. All lighted people are catholic. All discreet, idyllic people are landed. All catholic, landed people are overage. If someone is idyllic and overage then they are discreet. Orbadiah is lighted.", "logic": "\nIdyllic(orbadiah)\nScatty(orbadiah)\nOverage(orbadiah)\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Lighted(x))\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Lighted(x))\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Discreet(x) and Idyllic(x) -> Landed(x))\nforall x (Catholic(x) and Landed(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Idyllic(x) and Overage(x) -> Discreet(x))\n\nLighted(orbadiah)\n\nIdyllic(orbadiah) and Overage(orbadiah) and forall x (Idyllic(x) and Overage(x) -> Discreet(x)) -> therefore Discreet(orbadiah) Discreet(orbadiah) and forall x (Discreet(x) -> Lighted(x)) -> therefore Lighted(orbadiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Lucille is fallow. Lucille is additional. Lucille is stubborn. All homophobic people are wholemeal. If someone is homophobic then they are wholemeal. All wholemeal people are chaetal. All homophobic, fallow people are conversant. All chaetal, conversant people are stubborn. If someone is fallow and stubborn then they are homophobic. Lucille is not wholemeal.", "logic": "\nFallow(lucille)\nAdditional(lucille)\nStubborn(lucille)\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Wholemeal(x) -> Chaetal(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) and Fallow(x) -> Conversant(x))\nforall x (Chaetal(x) and Conversant(x) -> Stubborn(x))\nforall x (Fallow(x) and Stubborn(x) -> Homophobic(x))\n\nnot Wholemeal(lucille)\n\nFallow(lucille) and Stubborn(lucille) and forall x (Fallow(x) and Stubborn(x) -> Homophobic(x)) -> therefore Homophobic(lucille) Homophobic(lucille) and forall x (Homophobic(x) -> Wholemeal(x)) -> therefore Wholemeal(lucille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Teador is backless. Teador is brimfull. Teador is permeative. All pouched people are fourscore. If someone is pouched then they are fourscore. All fourscore people are cacuminal. All pouched, backless people are ennobling. All cacuminal, ennobling people are permeative. If someone is backless and permeative then they are pouched. Teador is cacuminal.", "logic": "\nBackless(teador)\nBrimfull(teador)\nPermeative(teador)\nforall x (Pouched(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Pouched(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Fourscore(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Pouched(x) and Backless(x) -> Ennobling(x))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Ennobling(x) -> Permeative(x))\nforall x (Backless(x) and Permeative(x) -> Pouched(x))\n\nCacuminal(teador)\n\nBackless(teador) and Permeative(teador) and forall x (Backless(x) and Permeative(x) -> Pouched(x)) -> therefore Pouched(teador) Pouched(teador) and forall x (Pouched(x) -> Fourscore(x)) -> therefore Fourscore(teador) Fourscore(teador) and forall x (Fourscore(x) -> Cacuminal(x)) -> therefore Cacuminal(teador)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "Candra is computable. Candra is starting. Candra is malawian. All provencal people are monodical. If someone is provencal then they are monodical. All monodical people are nubbly. All provencal, computable people are mediocre. All nubbly, mediocre people are malawian. If someone is computable and malawian then they are provencal. Candra is not nubbly.", "logic": "\nComputable(candra)\nStarting(candra)\nMalawian(candra)\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> Nubbly(x))\nforall x (Provencal(x) and Computable(x) -> Mediocre(x))\nforall x (Nubbly(x) and Mediocre(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Computable(x) and Malawian(x) -> Provencal(x))\n\nnot Nubbly(candra)\n\nComputable(candra) and Malawian(candra) and forall x (Computable(x) and Malawian(x) -> Provencal(x)) -> therefore Provencal(candra) Provencal(candra) and forall x (Provencal(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(candra) Monodical(candra) and forall x (Monodical(x) -> Nubbly(x)) -> therefore Nubbly(candra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1437"} {"premises": "The roseann does not chase the waring. The roseann does not see the carena. The carena is spanking. The carena is elongated. The carena harbinger the waring. The malcah fluoridize the carena. The malcah fluoridize the waring. The malcah is spanking. The malcah is jolted. The malcah harbinger the carena. The malcah harbinger the waring. The waring fluoridize the carena. If someone is spanking then they see the carena. If someone harbinger the malcah then the malcah seclude the roseann. If someone fluoridize the waring then the waring seclude the carena. If someone fluoridize the malcah then they see the roseann. If someone fluoridize the carena and they are not elongated then the carena fluoridize the roseann. If someone seclude the carena and they are spanking then the carena fluoridize the malcah. If the roseann is spanking and the roseann harbinger the waring then the roseann fluoridize the malcah. If the carena does not chase the roseann and the carena is not elongated then the carena harbinger the roseann. The malcah harbinger the waring.", "logic": "\nnot Fluoridize(roseann, waring)\nnot Seclude(roseann, carena)\nSpanking(carena)\nElongated(carena)\nHarbinger(carena, waring)\nFluoridize(malcah, carena)\nFluoridize(malcah, waring)\nSpanking(malcah)\nJolted(malcah)\nHarbinger(malcah, carena)\nHarbinger(malcah, waring)\nFluoridize(waring, carena)\nforall x (Spanking(x) -> Seclude(x, carena))\nforall x (Harbinger(x, malcah) -> Seclude(malcah, roseann))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, waring) -> Seclude(waring, carena))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, malcah) -> Seclude(x, roseann))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, carena) and not Elongated(x) -> Fluoridize(carena, roseann))\nforall x (Seclude(x, carena) and Spanking(x) -> Fluoridize(carena, malcah))\nSpanking(roseann) and Harbinger(roseann, waring) -> Fluoridize(roseann, malcah)\nnot Fluoridize(carena, roseann) and not Elongated(carena) -> Harbinger(carena, roseann)\n\nHarbinger(malcah, waring)\n\ntherefore Harbinger(malcah, waring)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The tamara does not chase the adelle. The tamara does not see the leon. The leon is gamy. The leon is strenuous. The leon decorate the adelle. The christie symphonise the leon. The christie symphonise the adelle. The christie is gamy. The christie is kept. The christie decorate the leon. The christie decorate the adelle. The adelle symphonise the leon. If someone is gamy then they see the leon. If someone decorate the christie then the christie exorcise the tamara. If someone symphonise the adelle then the adelle exorcise the leon. If someone symphonise the christie then they see the tamara. If someone symphonise the leon and they are not strenuous then the leon symphonise the tamara. If someone exorcise the leon and they are gamy then the leon symphonise the christie. If the tamara is gamy and the tamara decorate the adelle then the tamara symphonise the christie. If the leon does not chase the tamara and the leon is not strenuous then the leon decorate the tamara. The adelle does not chase the leon.", "logic": "\nnot Symphonise(tamara, adelle)\nnot Exorcise(tamara, leon)\nGamy(leon)\nStrenuous(leon)\nDecorate(leon, adelle)\nSymphonise(christie, leon)\nSymphonise(christie, adelle)\nGamy(christie)\nKept(christie)\nDecorate(christie, leon)\nDecorate(christie, adelle)\nSymphonise(adelle, leon)\nforall x (Gamy(x) -> Exorcise(x, leon))\nforall x (Decorate(x, christie) -> Exorcise(christie, tamara))\nforall x (Symphonise(x, adelle) -> Exorcise(adelle, leon))\nforall x (Symphonise(x, christie) -> Exorcise(x, tamara))\nforall x (Symphonise(x, leon) and not Strenuous(x) -> Symphonise(leon, tamara))\nforall x (Exorcise(x, leon) and Gamy(x) -> Symphonise(leon, christie))\nGamy(tamara) and Decorate(tamara, adelle) -> Symphonise(tamara, christie)\nnot Symphonise(leon, tamara) and not Strenuous(leon) -> Decorate(leon, tamara)\n\nnot Symphonise(adelle, leon)\n\ntherefore Symphonise(adelle, leon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The pate does not chase the raynard. The pate does not see the cyrill. The cyrill is unaged. The cyrill is upraised. The cyrill anodize the raynard. The beckie highlight the cyrill. The beckie highlight the raynard. The beckie is unaged. The beckie is snug. The beckie anodize the cyrill. The beckie anodize the raynard. The raynard highlight the cyrill. If someone is unaged then they see the cyrill. If someone anodize the beckie then the beckie merit the pate. If someone highlight the raynard then the raynard merit the cyrill. If someone highlight the beckie then they see the pate. If someone highlight the cyrill and they are not upraised then the cyrill highlight the pate. If someone merit the cyrill and they are unaged then the cyrill highlight the beckie. If the pate is unaged and the pate anodize the raynard then the pate highlight the beckie. If the cyrill does not chase the pate and the cyrill is not upraised then the cyrill anodize the pate. The beckie merit the cyrill.", "logic": "\nnot Highlight(pate, raynard)\nnot Merit(pate, cyrill)\nUnaged(cyrill)\nUpraised(cyrill)\nAnodize(cyrill, raynard)\nHighlight(beckie, cyrill)\nHighlight(beckie, raynard)\nUnaged(beckie)\nSnug(beckie)\nAnodize(beckie, cyrill)\nAnodize(beckie, raynard)\nHighlight(raynard, cyrill)\nforall x (Unaged(x) -> Merit(x, cyrill))\nforall x (Anodize(x, beckie) -> Merit(beckie, pate))\nforall x (Highlight(x, raynard) -> Merit(raynard, cyrill))\nforall x (Highlight(x, beckie) -> Merit(x, pate))\nforall x (Highlight(x, cyrill) and not Upraised(x) -> Highlight(cyrill, pate))\nforall x (Merit(x, cyrill) and Unaged(x) -> Highlight(cyrill, beckie))\nUnaged(pate) and Anodize(pate, raynard) -> Highlight(pate, beckie)\nnot Highlight(cyrill, pate) and not Upraised(cyrill) -> Anodize(cyrill, pate)\n\nMerit(beckie, cyrill)\n\nUnaged(beckie) and forall x (Unaged(x) -> Merit(x, cyrill)) -> therefore Merit(beckie, cyrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The calida does not chase the peggie. The calida does not see the merril. The merril is vicenary. The merril is leakproof. The merril pettifog the peggie. The janette undershoot the merril. The janette undershoot the peggie. The janette is vicenary. The janette is steep. The janette pettifog the merril. The janette pettifog the peggie. The peggie undershoot the merril. If someone is vicenary then they see the merril. If someone pettifog the janette then the janette thrum the calida. If someone undershoot the peggie then the peggie thrum the merril. If someone undershoot the janette then they see the calida. If someone undershoot the merril and they are not leakproof then the merril undershoot the calida. If someone thrum the merril and they are vicenary then the merril undershoot the janette. If the calida is vicenary and the calida pettifog the peggie then the calida undershoot the janette. If the merril does not chase the calida and the merril is not leakproof then the merril pettifog the calida. The peggie does not see the merril.", "logic": "\nnot Undershoot(calida, peggie)\nnot Thrum(calida, merril)\nVicenary(merril)\nLeakproof(merril)\nPettifog(merril, peggie)\nUndershoot(janette, merril)\nUndershoot(janette, peggie)\nVicenary(janette)\nSteep(janette)\nPettifog(janette, merril)\nPettifog(janette, peggie)\nUndershoot(peggie, merril)\nforall x (Vicenary(x) -> Thrum(x, merril))\nforall x (Pettifog(x, janette) -> Thrum(janette, calida))\nforall x (Undershoot(x, peggie) -> Thrum(peggie, merril))\nforall x (Undershoot(x, janette) -> Thrum(x, calida))\nforall x (Undershoot(x, merril) and not Leakproof(x) -> Undershoot(merril, calida))\nforall x (Thrum(x, merril) and Vicenary(x) -> Undershoot(merril, janette))\nVicenary(calida) and Pettifog(calida, peggie) -> Undershoot(calida, janette)\nnot Undershoot(merril, calida) and not Leakproof(merril) -> Pettifog(merril, calida)\n\nnot Thrum(peggie, merril)\n\nUndershoot(janette, peggie) and forall x (Undershoot(x, peggie) -> Thrum(peggie, merril)) -> therefore Thrum(peggie, merril)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The halette does not chase the marthena. The halette does not see the charlot. The charlot is outer. The charlot is antimonial. The charlot welt the marthena. The joann effloresce the charlot. The joann effloresce the marthena. The joann is outer. The joann is amuck. The joann welt the charlot. The joann welt the marthena. The marthena effloresce the charlot. If someone is outer then they see the charlot. If someone welt the joann then the joann schematize the halette. If someone effloresce the marthena then the marthena schematize the charlot. If someone effloresce the joann then they see the halette. If someone effloresce the charlot and they are not antimonial then the charlot effloresce the halette. If someone schematize the charlot and they are outer then the charlot effloresce the joann. If the halette is outer and the halette welt the marthena then the halette effloresce the joann. If the charlot does not chase the halette and the charlot is not antimonial then the charlot welt the halette. The charlot effloresce the joann.", "logic": "\nnot Effloresce(halette, marthena)\nnot Schematize(halette, charlot)\nOuter(charlot)\nAntimonial(charlot)\nWelt(charlot, marthena)\nEffloresce(joann, charlot)\nEffloresce(joann, marthena)\nOuter(joann)\nAmuck(joann)\nWelt(joann, charlot)\nWelt(joann, marthena)\nEffloresce(marthena, charlot)\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Schematize(x, charlot))\nforall x (Welt(x, joann) -> Schematize(joann, halette))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, marthena) -> Schematize(marthena, charlot))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, joann) -> Schematize(x, halette))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, charlot) and not Antimonial(x) -> Effloresce(charlot, halette))\nforall x (Schematize(x, charlot) and Outer(x) -> Effloresce(charlot, joann))\nOuter(halette) and Welt(halette, marthena) -> Effloresce(halette, joann)\nnot Effloresce(charlot, halette) and not Antimonial(charlot) -> Welt(charlot, halette)\n\nEffloresce(charlot, joann)\n\nOuter(charlot) and forall x (Outer(x) -> Schematize(x, charlot)) -> therefore Schematize(charlot, charlot) Schematize(charlot, charlot) and Outer(charlot) and forall x (Schematize(x, charlot) and Outer(x) -> Effloresce(charlot, joann)) -> therefore Effloresce(charlot, joann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The carmina does not chase the rickey. The carmina does not see the augusta. The augusta is scented. The augusta is unjust. The augusta scrutinise the rickey. The drew anodize the augusta. The drew anodize the rickey. The drew is scented. The drew is rocky. The drew scrutinise the augusta. The drew scrutinise the rickey. The rickey anodize the augusta. If someone is scented then they see the augusta. If someone scrutinise the drew then the drew banter the carmina. If someone anodize the rickey then the rickey banter the augusta. If someone anodize the drew then they see the carmina. If someone anodize the augusta and they are not unjust then the augusta anodize the carmina. If someone banter the augusta and they are scented then the augusta anodize the drew. If the carmina is scented and the carmina scrutinise the rickey then the carmina anodize the drew. If the augusta does not chase the carmina and the augusta is not unjust then the augusta scrutinise the carmina. The augusta does not chase the drew.", "logic": "\nnot Anodize(carmina, rickey)\nnot Banter(carmina, augusta)\nScented(augusta)\nUnjust(augusta)\nScrutinise(augusta, rickey)\nAnodize(drew, augusta)\nAnodize(drew, rickey)\nScented(drew)\nRocky(drew)\nScrutinise(drew, augusta)\nScrutinise(drew, rickey)\nAnodize(rickey, augusta)\nforall x (Scented(x) -> Banter(x, augusta))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, drew) -> Banter(drew, carmina))\nforall x (Anodize(x, rickey) -> Banter(rickey, augusta))\nforall x (Anodize(x, drew) -> Banter(x, carmina))\nforall x (Anodize(x, augusta) and not Unjust(x) -> Anodize(augusta, carmina))\nforall x (Banter(x, augusta) and Scented(x) -> Anodize(augusta, drew))\nScented(carmina) and Scrutinise(carmina, rickey) -> Anodize(carmina, drew)\nnot Anodize(augusta, carmina) and not Unjust(augusta) -> Scrutinise(augusta, carmina)\n\nnot Anodize(augusta, drew)\n\nScented(augusta) and forall x (Scented(x) -> Banter(x, augusta)) -> therefore Banter(augusta, augusta) Banter(augusta, augusta) and Scented(augusta) and forall x (Banter(x, augusta) and Scented(x) -> Anodize(augusta, drew)) -> therefore Anodize(augusta, drew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The wes does not chase the dunc. The wes does not see the susi. The susi is abducting. The susi is fabian. The susi trace the dunc. The elberta adsorb the susi. The elberta adsorb the dunc. The elberta is abducting. The elberta is bounderish. The elberta trace the susi. The elberta trace the dunc. The dunc adsorb the susi. If someone is abducting then they see the susi. If someone trace the elberta then the elberta trench the wes. If someone adsorb the dunc then the dunc trench the susi. If someone adsorb the elberta then they see the wes. If someone adsorb the susi and they are not fabian then the susi adsorb the wes. If someone trench the susi and they are abducting then the susi adsorb the elberta. If the wes is abducting and the wes trace the dunc then the wes adsorb the elberta. If the susi does not chase the wes and the susi is not fabian then the susi trace the wes. The susi trench the wes.", "logic": "\nnot Adsorb(wes, dunc)\nnot Trench(wes, susi)\nAbducting(susi)\nFabian(susi)\nTrace(susi, dunc)\nAdsorb(elberta, susi)\nAdsorb(elberta, dunc)\nAbducting(elberta)\nBounderish(elberta)\nTrace(elberta, susi)\nTrace(elberta, dunc)\nAdsorb(dunc, susi)\nforall x (Abducting(x) -> Trench(x, susi))\nforall x (Trace(x, elberta) -> Trench(elberta, wes))\nforall x (Adsorb(x, dunc) -> Trench(dunc, susi))\nforall x (Adsorb(x, elberta) -> Trench(x, wes))\nforall x (Adsorb(x, susi) and not Fabian(x) -> Adsorb(susi, wes))\nforall x (Trench(x, susi) and Abducting(x) -> Adsorb(susi, elberta))\nAbducting(wes) and Trace(wes, dunc) -> Adsorb(wes, elberta)\nnot Adsorb(susi, wes) and not Fabian(susi) -> Trace(susi, wes)\n\nTrench(susi, wes)\n\nAbducting(susi) and forall x (Abducting(x) -> Trench(x, susi)) -> therefore Trench(susi, susi) Trench(susi, susi) and Abducting(susi) and forall x (Trench(x, susi) and Abducting(x) -> Adsorb(susi, elberta)) -> therefore Adsorb(susi, elberta) Adsorb(susi, elberta) and forall x (Adsorb(x, elberta) -> Trench(x, wes)) -> therefore Trench(susi, wes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The laetitia does not chase the henrique. The laetitia does not see the melesa. The melesa is nether. The melesa is weakened. The melesa tipple the henrique. The nicola reheel the melesa. The nicola reheel the henrique. The nicola is nether. The nicola is untrusting. The nicola tipple the melesa. The nicola tipple the henrique. The henrique reheel the melesa. If someone is nether then they see the melesa. If someone tipple the nicola then the nicola chelate the laetitia. If someone reheel the henrique then the henrique chelate the melesa. If someone reheel the nicola then they see the laetitia. If someone reheel the melesa and they are not weakened then the melesa reheel the laetitia. If someone chelate the melesa and they are nether then the melesa reheel the nicola. If the laetitia is nether and the laetitia tipple the henrique then the laetitia reheel the nicola. If the melesa does not chase the laetitia and the melesa is not weakened then the melesa tipple the laetitia. The melesa does not see the laetitia.", "logic": "\nnot Reheel(laetitia, henrique)\nnot Chelate(laetitia, melesa)\nNether(melesa)\nWeakened(melesa)\nTipple(melesa, henrique)\nReheel(nicola, melesa)\nReheel(nicola, henrique)\nNether(nicola)\nUntrusting(nicola)\nTipple(nicola, melesa)\nTipple(nicola, henrique)\nReheel(henrique, melesa)\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Chelate(x, melesa))\nforall x (Tipple(x, nicola) -> Chelate(nicola, laetitia))\nforall x (Reheel(x, henrique) -> Chelate(henrique, melesa))\nforall x (Reheel(x, nicola) -> Chelate(x, laetitia))\nforall x (Reheel(x, melesa) and not Weakened(x) -> Reheel(melesa, laetitia))\nforall x (Chelate(x, melesa) and Nether(x) -> Reheel(melesa, nicola))\nNether(laetitia) and Tipple(laetitia, henrique) -> Reheel(laetitia, nicola)\nnot Reheel(melesa, laetitia) and not Weakened(melesa) -> Tipple(melesa, laetitia)\n\nnot Chelate(melesa, laetitia)\n\nNether(melesa) and forall x (Nether(x) -> Chelate(x, melesa)) -> therefore Chelate(melesa, melesa) Chelate(melesa, melesa) and Nether(melesa) and forall x (Chelate(x, melesa) and Nether(x) -> Reheel(melesa, nicola)) -> therefore Reheel(melesa, nicola) Reheel(melesa, nicola) and forall x (Reheel(x, nicola) -> Chelate(x, laetitia)) -> therefore Chelate(melesa, laetitia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The tybalt does not chase the wendall. The tybalt does not see the marya. The marya is anestrous. The marya is sanctified. The marya birdwatch the wendall. The lorie chill the marya. The lorie chill the wendall. The lorie is anestrous. The lorie is diabetic. The lorie birdwatch the marya. The lorie birdwatch the wendall. The wendall chill the marya. If someone is anestrous then they see the marya. If someone birdwatch the lorie then the lorie crusade the tybalt. If someone chill the wendall then the wendall crusade the marya. If someone chill the lorie then they see the tybalt. If someone chill the marya and they are not sanctified then the marya chill the tybalt. If someone crusade the marya and they are anestrous then the marya chill the lorie. If the tybalt is anestrous and the tybalt birdwatch the wendall then the tybalt chill the lorie. If the marya does not chase the tybalt and the marya is not sanctified then the marya birdwatch the tybalt. The marya does not like the tybalt.", "logic": "\nnot Chill(tybalt, wendall)\nnot Crusade(tybalt, marya)\nAnestrous(marya)\nSanctified(marya)\nBirdwatch(marya, wendall)\nChill(lorie, marya)\nChill(lorie, wendall)\nAnestrous(lorie)\nDiabetic(lorie)\nBirdwatch(lorie, marya)\nBirdwatch(lorie, wendall)\nChill(wendall, marya)\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> Crusade(x, marya))\nforall x (Birdwatch(x, lorie) -> Crusade(lorie, tybalt))\nforall x (Chill(x, wendall) -> Crusade(wendall, marya))\nforall x (Chill(x, lorie) -> Crusade(x, tybalt))\nforall x (Chill(x, marya) and not Sanctified(x) -> Chill(marya, tybalt))\nforall x (Crusade(x, marya) and Anestrous(x) -> Chill(marya, lorie))\nAnestrous(tybalt) and Birdwatch(tybalt, wendall) -> Chill(tybalt, lorie)\nnot Chill(marya, tybalt) and not Sanctified(marya) -> Birdwatch(marya, tybalt)\n\nnot Birdwatch(marya, tybalt)\n\nnot Chill(marya, tybalt) and not Sanctified(marya) -> Birdwatch(marya, tybalt) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The gwenni does not chase the hamish. The gwenni does not see the robbert. The robbert is multilevel. The robbert is malformed. The robbert beef the hamish. The rolph chuff the robbert. The rolph chuff the hamish. The rolph is multilevel. The rolph is alloyed. The rolph beef the robbert. The rolph beef the hamish. The hamish chuff the robbert. If someone is multilevel then they see the robbert. If someone beef the rolph then the rolph debase the gwenni. If someone chuff the hamish then the hamish debase the robbert. If someone chuff the rolph then they see the gwenni. If someone chuff the robbert and they are not malformed then the robbert chuff the gwenni. If someone debase the robbert and they are multilevel then the robbert chuff the rolph. If the gwenni is multilevel and the gwenni beef the hamish then the gwenni chuff the rolph. If the robbert does not chase the gwenni and the robbert is not malformed then the robbert beef the gwenni. The gwenni debase the gwenni.", "logic": "\nnot Chuff(gwenni, hamish)\nnot Debase(gwenni, robbert)\nMultilevel(robbert)\nMalformed(robbert)\nBeef(robbert, hamish)\nChuff(rolph, robbert)\nChuff(rolph, hamish)\nMultilevel(rolph)\nAlloyed(rolph)\nBeef(rolph, robbert)\nBeef(rolph, hamish)\nChuff(hamish, robbert)\nforall x (Multilevel(x) -> Debase(x, robbert))\nforall x (Beef(x, rolph) -> Debase(rolph, gwenni))\nforall x (Chuff(x, hamish) -> Debase(hamish, robbert))\nforall x (Chuff(x, rolph) -> Debase(x, gwenni))\nforall x (Chuff(x, robbert) and not Malformed(x) -> Chuff(robbert, gwenni))\nforall x (Debase(x, robbert) and Multilevel(x) -> Chuff(robbert, rolph))\nMultilevel(gwenni) and Beef(gwenni, hamish) -> Chuff(gwenni, rolph)\nnot Chuff(robbert, gwenni) and not Malformed(robbert) -> Beef(robbert, gwenni)\n\nDebase(gwenni, gwenni)\n\nforall x (Chuff(x, rolph) -> Debase(x, gwenni)) <- Multilevel(gwenni) and Beef(gwenni, hamish) -> Chuff(gwenni, rolph) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The benjamin does not chase the blinny. The benjamin does not see the kayla. The kayla is oblate. The kayla is untaxed. The kayla minify the blinny. The finley debark the kayla. The finley debark the blinny. The finley is oblate. The finley is concurring. The finley minify the kayla. The finley minify the blinny. The blinny debark the kayla. If someone is oblate then they see the kayla. If someone minify the finley then the finley imply the benjamin. If someone debark the blinny then the blinny imply the kayla. If someone debark the finley then they see the benjamin. If someone debark the kayla and they are not untaxed then the kayla debark the benjamin. If someone imply the kayla and they are oblate then the kayla debark the finley. If the benjamin is oblate and the benjamin minify the blinny then the benjamin debark the finley. If the kayla does not chase the benjamin and the kayla is not untaxed then the kayla minify the benjamin. The kayla does not chase the benjamin.", "logic": "\nnot Debark(benjamin, blinny)\nnot Imply(benjamin, kayla)\nOblate(kayla)\nUntaxed(kayla)\nMinify(kayla, blinny)\nDebark(finley, kayla)\nDebark(finley, blinny)\nOblate(finley)\nConcurring(finley)\nMinify(finley, kayla)\nMinify(finley, blinny)\nDebark(blinny, kayla)\nforall x (Oblate(x) -> Imply(x, kayla))\nforall x (Minify(x, finley) -> Imply(finley, benjamin))\nforall x (Debark(x, blinny) -> Imply(blinny, kayla))\nforall x (Debark(x, finley) -> Imply(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Debark(x, kayla) and not Untaxed(x) -> Debark(kayla, benjamin))\nforall x (Imply(x, kayla) and Oblate(x) -> Debark(kayla, finley))\nOblate(benjamin) and Minify(benjamin, blinny) -> Debark(benjamin, finley)\nnot Debark(kayla, benjamin) and not Untaxed(kayla) -> Minify(kayla, benjamin)\n\nnot Debark(kayla, benjamin)\n\nforall x (Debark(x, kayla) and not Untaxed(x) -> Debark(kayla, benjamin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The caroleen does not chase the rosalynd. The caroleen does not see the hyatt. The hyatt is unbleached. The hyatt is affected. The hyatt volatilise the rosalynd. The ursula creep the hyatt. The ursula creep the rosalynd. The ursula is unbleached. The ursula is worsened. The ursula volatilise the hyatt. The ursula volatilise the rosalynd. The rosalynd creep the hyatt. If someone is unbleached then they see the hyatt. If someone volatilise the ursula then the ursula overstress the caroleen. If someone creep the rosalynd then the rosalynd overstress the hyatt. If someone creep the ursula then they see the caroleen. If someone creep the hyatt and they are not affected then the hyatt creep the caroleen. If someone overstress the hyatt and they are unbleached then the hyatt creep the ursula. If the caroleen is unbleached and the caroleen volatilise the rosalynd then the caroleen creep the ursula. If the hyatt does not chase the caroleen and the hyatt is not affected then the hyatt volatilise the caroleen. The ursula overstress the caroleen.", "logic": "\nnot Creep(caroleen, rosalynd)\nnot Overstress(caroleen, hyatt)\nUnbleached(hyatt)\nAffected(hyatt)\nVolatilise(hyatt, rosalynd)\nCreep(ursula, hyatt)\nCreep(ursula, rosalynd)\nUnbleached(ursula)\nWorsened(ursula)\nVolatilise(ursula, hyatt)\nVolatilise(ursula, rosalynd)\nCreep(rosalynd, hyatt)\nforall x (Unbleached(x) -> Overstress(x, hyatt))\nforall x (Volatilise(x, ursula) -> Overstress(ursula, caroleen))\nforall x (Creep(x, rosalynd) -> Overstress(rosalynd, hyatt))\nforall x (Creep(x, ursula) -> Overstress(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Creep(x, hyatt) and not Affected(x) -> Creep(hyatt, caroleen))\nforall x (Overstress(x, hyatt) and Unbleached(x) -> Creep(hyatt, ursula))\nUnbleached(caroleen) and Volatilise(caroleen, rosalynd) -> Creep(caroleen, ursula)\nnot Creep(hyatt, caroleen) and not Affected(hyatt) -> Volatilise(hyatt, caroleen)\n\nOverstress(ursula, caroleen)\n\nforall x (Volatilise(x, ursula) -> Overstress(ursula, caroleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The orelie does not chase the britaney. The orelie does not see the parnell. The parnell is lubricated. The parnell is herbaceous. The parnell bruise the britaney. The dehlia concretise the parnell. The dehlia concretise the britaney. The dehlia is lubricated. The dehlia is cryptical. The dehlia bruise the parnell. The dehlia bruise the britaney. The britaney concretise the parnell. If someone is lubricated then they see the parnell. If someone bruise the dehlia then the dehlia ionize the orelie. If someone concretise the britaney then the britaney ionize the parnell. If someone concretise the dehlia then they see the orelie. If someone concretise the parnell and they are not herbaceous then the parnell concretise the orelie. If someone ionize the parnell and they are lubricated then the parnell concretise the dehlia. If the orelie is lubricated and the orelie bruise the britaney then the orelie concretise the dehlia. If the parnell does not chase the orelie and the parnell is not herbaceous then the parnell bruise the orelie. The britaney does not like the orelie.", "logic": "\nnot Concretise(orelie, britaney)\nnot Ionize(orelie, parnell)\nLubricated(parnell)\nHerbaceous(parnell)\nBruise(parnell, britaney)\nConcretise(dehlia, parnell)\nConcretise(dehlia, britaney)\nLubricated(dehlia)\nCryptical(dehlia)\nBruise(dehlia, parnell)\nBruise(dehlia, britaney)\nConcretise(britaney, parnell)\nforall x (Lubricated(x) -> Ionize(x, parnell))\nforall x (Bruise(x, dehlia) -> Ionize(dehlia, orelie))\nforall x (Concretise(x, britaney) -> Ionize(britaney, parnell))\nforall x (Concretise(x, dehlia) -> Ionize(x, orelie))\nforall x (Concretise(x, parnell) and not Herbaceous(x) -> Concretise(parnell, orelie))\nforall x (Ionize(x, parnell) and Lubricated(x) -> Concretise(parnell, dehlia))\nLubricated(orelie) and Bruise(orelie, britaney) -> Concretise(orelie, dehlia)\nnot Concretise(parnell, orelie) and not Herbaceous(parnell) -> Bruise(parnell, orelie)\n\nnot Bruise(britaney, orelie)\n\nnot Bruise(britaney, orelie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The sherman does not chase the hertha. The sherman does not see the meg. The meg is wieldy. The meg is other. The meg signal the hertha. The cyrill effervesce the meg. The cyrill effervesce the hertha. The cyrill is wieldy. The cyrill is burned. The cyrill signal the meg. The cyrill signal the hertha. The hertha effervesce the meg. If someone is wieldy then they see the meg. If someone signal the cyrill then the cyrill torture the sherman. If someone effervesce the hertha then the hertha torture the meg. If someone effervesce the cyrill then they see the sherman. If someone effervesce the meg and they are not other then the meg effervesce the sherman. If someone torture the meg and they are wieldy then the meg effervesce the cyrill. If the sherman is wieldy and the sherman signal the hertha then the sherman effervesce the cyrill. If the meg does not chase the sherman and the meg is not other then the meg signal the sherman. The cyrill is nice.", "logic": "\nnot Effervesce(sherman, hertha)\nnot Torture(sherman, meg)\nWieldy(meg)\nOther(meg)\nSignal(meg, hertha)\nEffervesce(cyrill, meg)\nEffervesce(cyrill, hertha)\nWieldy(cyrill)\nBurned(cyrill)\nSignal(cyrill, meg)\nSignal(cyrill, hertha)\nEffervesce(hertha, meg)\nforall x (Wieldy(x) -> Torture(x, meg))\nforall x (Signal(x, cyrill) -> Torture(cyrill, sherman))\nforall x (Effervesce(x, hertha) -> Torture(hertha, meg))\nforall x (Effervesce(x, cyrill) -> Torture(x, sherman))\nforall x (Effervesce(x, meg) and not Other(x) -> Effervesce(meg, sherman))\nforall x (Torture(x, meg) and Wieldy(x) -> Effervesce(meg, cyrill))\nWieldy(sherman) and Signal(sherman, hertha) -> Effervesce(sherman, cyrill)\nnot Effervesce(meg, sherman) and not Other(meg) -> Signal(meg, sherman)\n\nNice(cyrill)\n\nNice(cyrill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The leonerd does not chase the easter. The leonerd does not see the gilberto. The gilberto is contained. The gilberto is untethered. The gilberto tumefy the easter. The shalom fleece the gilberto. The shalom fleece the easter. The shalom is contained. The shalom is lidded. The shalom tumefy the gilberto. The shalom tumefy the easter. The easter fleece the gilberto. If someone is contained then they see the gilberto. If someone tumefy the shalom then the shalom unbend the leonerd. If someone fleece the easter then the easter unbend the gilberto. If someone fleece the shalom then they see the leonerd. If someone fleece the gilberto and they are not untethered then the gilberto fleece the leonerd. If someone unbend the gilberto and they are contained then the gilberto fleece the shalom. If the leonerd is contained and the leonerd tumefy the easter then the leonerd fleece the shalom. If the gilberto does not chase the leonerd and the gilberto is not untethered then the gilberto tumefy the leonerd. The shalom does not chase the leonerd.", "logic": "\nnot Fleece(leonerd, easter)\nnot Unbend(leonerd, gilberto)\nContained(gilberto)\nUntethered(gilberto)\nTumefy(gilberto, easter)\nFleece(shalom, gilberto)\nFleece(shalom, easter)\nContained(shalom)\nLidded(shalom)\nTumefy(shalom, gilberto)\nTumefy(shalom, easter)\nFleece(easter, gilberto)\nforall x (Contained(x) -> Unbend(x, gilberto))\nforall x (Tumefy(x, shalom) -> Unbend(shalom, leonerd))\nforall x (Fleece(x, easter) -> Unbend(easter, gilberto))\nforall x (Fleece(x, shalom) -> Unbend(x, leonerd))\nforall x (Fleece(x, gilberto) and not Untethered(x) -> Fleece(gilberto, leonerd))\nforall x (Unbend(x, gilberto) and Contained(x) -> Fleece(gilberto, shalom))\nContained(leonerd) and Tumefy(leonerd, easter) -> Fleece(leonerd, shalom)\nnot Fleece(gilberto, leonerd) and not Untethered(gilberto) -> Tumefy(gilberto, leonerd)\n\nnot Fleece(shalom, leonerd)\n\nnot Fleece(shalom, leonerd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The cesya does not chase the dyanne. The cesya does not see the tansy. The tansy is fortified. The tansy is acuminate. The tansy harlequin the dyanne. The lesly model the tansy. The lesly model the dyanne. The lesly is fortified. The lesly is sleety. The lesly harlequin the tansy. The lesly harlequin the dyanne. The dyanne model the tansy. If someone is fortified then they see the tansy. If someone harlequin the lesly then the lesly attract the cesya. If someone model the dyanne then the dyanne attract the tansy. If someone model the lesly then they see the cesya. If someone model the tansy and they are not acuminate then the tansy model the cesya. If someone attract the tansy and they are fortified then the tansy model the lesly. If the cesya is fortified and the cesya harlequin the dyanne then the cesya model the lesly. If the tansy does not chase the cesya and the tansy is not acuminate then the tansy harlequin the cesya. The cesya harlequin the tansy.", "logic": "\nnot Model(cesya, dyanne)\nnot Attract(cesya, tansy)\nFortified(tansy)\nAcuminate(tansy)\nHarlequin(tansy, dyanne)\nModel(lesly, tansy)\nModel(lesly, dyanne)\nFortified(lesly)\nSleety(lesly)\nHarlequin(lesly, tansy)\nHarlequin(lesly, dyanne)\nModel(dyanne, tansy)\nforall x (Fortified(x) -> Attract(x, tansy))\nforall x (Harlequin(x, lesly) -> Attract(lesly, cesya))\nforall x (Model(x, dyanne) -> Attract(dyanne, tansy))\nforall x (Model(x, lesly) -> Attract(x, cesya))\nforall x (Model(x, tansy) and not Acuminate(x) -> Model(tansy, cesya))\nforall x (Attract(x, tansy) and Fortified(x) -> Model(tansy, lesly))\nFortified(cesya) and Harlequin(cesya, dyanne) -> Model(cesya, lesly)\nnot Model(tansy, cesya) and not Acuminate(tansy) -> Harlequin(tansy, cesya)\n\nHarlequin(cesya, tansy)\n\nHarlequin(cesya, tansy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-623"} {"premises": "The brita is not touchable. The brita tink the mathilda. The brita bribe the mathilda. The thornton is weaponless. The thornton tink the brita. The thornton tink the lorene. The thornton bribe the brita. The thornton bribe the mathilda. The thornton does not see the lorene. The thornton snicker the brita. The thornton snicker the mathilda. The thornton snicker the lorene. The mathilda is touchable. The mathilda does not need the lorene. The mathilda snicker the brita. The lorene bribe the brita. If someone bribe the brita then they visit the thornton. If someone is touchable then they see the mathilda. If someone tink the mathilda and they see the thornton then the mathilda does not see the brita. If someone bribe the thornton and the thornton is touchable then the thornton snicker the mathilda. If someone tink the mathilda then the mathilda is crenulate. If someone bribe the mathilda and the mathilda bribe the lorene then the lorene tink the mathilda. If the mathilda bribe the lorene and the mathilda is not olfactive then the mathilda is not touchable. If someone is crenulate then they see the lorene. The thornton snicker the lorene.", "logic": "\nnot Touchable(brita)\nTink(brita, mathilda)\nBribe(brita, mathilda)\nWeaponless(thornton)\nTink(thornton, brita)\nTink(thornton, lorene)\nBribe(thornton, brita)\nBribe(thornton, mathilda)\nnot Bribe(thornton, lorene)\nSnicker(thornton, brita)\nSnicker(thornton, mathilda)\nSnicker(thornton, lorene)\nTouchable(mathilda)\nnot Tink(mathilda, lorene)\nSnicker(mathilda, brita)\nBribe(lorene, brita)\nforall x (Bribe(x, brita) -> Snicker(x, thornton))\nforall x (Touchable(x) -> Bribe(x, mathilda))\nforall x (Tink(x, mathilda) and Bribe(x, thornton) -> not Bribe(mathilda, brita))\nforall x (Bribe(x, thornton) and Touchable(thornton) -> Snicker(thornton, mathilda))\nforall x (Tink(x, mathilda) -> Crenulate(mathilda))\nforall x (Bribe(x, mathilda) and Bribe(mathilda, lorene) -> Tink(lorene, mathilda))\nBribe(mathilda, lorene) and not Olfactive(mathilda) -> not Touchable(mathilda)\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Bribe(x, lorene))\n\nSnicker(thornton, lorene)\n\ntherefore Snicker(thornton, lorene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The ailyn is not lissom. The ailyn unload the janaye. The ailyn oversee the janaye. The claudelle is causeless. The claudelle unload the ailyn. The claudelle unload the audre. The claudelle oversee the ailyn. The claudelle oversee the janaye. The claudelle does not see the audre. The claudelle devitalise the ailyn. The claudelle devitalise the janaye. The claudelle devitalise the audre. The janaye is lissom. The janaye does not need the audre. The janaye devitalise the ailyn. The audre oversee the ailyn. If someone oversee the ailyn then they visit the claudelle. If someone is lissom then they see the janaye. If someone unload the janaye and they see the claudelle then the janaye does not see the ailyn. If someone oversee the claudelle and the claudelle is lissom then the claudelle devitalise the janaye. If someone unload the janaye then the janaye is watered. If someone oversee the janaye and the janaye oversee the audre then the audre unload the janaye. If the janaye oversee the audre and the janaye is not unoiled then the janaye is not lissom. If someone is watered then they see the audre. The claudelle does not visit the janaye.", "logic": "\nnot Lissom(ailyn)\nUnload(ailyn, janaye)\nOversee(ailyn, janaye)\nCauseless(claudelle)\nUnload(claudelle, ailyn)\nUnload(claudelle, audre)\nOversee(claudelle, ailyn)\nOversee(claudelle, janaye)\nnot Oversee(claudelle, audre)\nDevitalise(claudelle, ailyn)\nDevitalise(claudelle, janaye)\nDevitalise(claudelle, audre)\nLissom(janaye)\nnot Unload(janaye, audre)\nDevitalise(janaye, ailyn)\nOversee(audre, ailyn)\nforall x (Oversee(x, ailyn) -> Devitalise(x, claudelle))\nforall x (Lissom(x) -> Oversee(x, janaye))\nforall x (Unload(x, janaye) and Oversee(x, claudelle) -> not Oversee(janaye, ailyn))\nforall x (Oversee(x, claudelle) and Lissom(claudelle) -> Devitalise(claudelle, janaye))\nforall x (Unload(x, janaye) -> Watered(janaye))\nforall x (Oversee(x, janaye) and Oversee(janaye, audre) -> Unload(audre, janaye))\nOversee(janaye, audre) and not Unoiled(janaye) -> not Lissom(janaye)\nforall x (Watered(x) -> Oversee(x, audre))\n\nnot Devitalise(claudelle, janaye)\n\ntherefore Devitalise(claudelle, janaye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The karon is not descendant. The karon judge the raquel. The karon invalid the raquel. The amargo is uninfected. The amargo judge the karon. The amargo judge the joann. The amargo invalid the karon. The amargo invalid the raquel. The amargo does not see the joann. The amargo refloat the karon. The amargo refloat the raquel. The amargo refloat the joann. The raquel is descendant. The raquel does not need the joann. The raquel refloat the karon. The joann invalid the karon. If someone invalid the karon then they visit the amargo. If someone is descendant then they see the raquel. If someone judge the raquel and they see the amargo then the raquel does not see the karon. If someone invalid the amargo and the amargo is descendant then the amargo refloat the raquel. If someone judge the raquel then the raquel is ferocious. If someone invalid the raquel and the raquel invalid the joann then the joann judge the raquel. If the raquel invalid the joann and the raquel is not uncordial then the raquel is not descendant. If someone is ferocious then they see the joann. The raquel is ferocious.", "logic": "\nnot Descendant(karon)\nJudge(karon, raquel)\nInvalid(karon, raquel)\nUninfected(amargo)\nJudge(amargo, karon)\nJudge(amargo, joann)\nInvalid(amargo, karon)\nInvalid(amargo, raquel)\nnot Invalid(amargo, joann)\nRefloat(amargo, karon)\nRefloat(amargo, raquel)\nRefloat(amargo, joann)\nDescendant(raquel)\nnot Judge(raquel, joann)\nRefloat(raquel, karon)\nInvalid(joann, karon)\nforall x (Invalid(x, karon) -> Refloat(x, amargo))\nforall x (Descendant(x) -> Invalid(x, raquel))\nforall x (Judge(x, raquel) and Invalid(x, amargo) -> not Invalid(raquel, karon))\nforall x (Invalid(x, amargo) and Descendant(amargo) -> Refloat(amargo, raquel))\nforall x (Judge(x, raquel) -> Ferocious(raquel))\nforall x (Invalid(x, raquel) and Invalid(raquel, joann) -> Judge(joann, raquel))\nInvalid(raquel, joann) and not Uncordial(raquel) -> not Descendant(raquel)\nforall x (Ferocious(x) -> Invalid(x, joann))\n\nFerocious(raquel)\n\nJudge(karon, raquel) and forall x (Judge(x, raquel) -> Ferocious(raquel)) -> therefore Ferocious(raquel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The thayne is not onstage. The thayne port the shari. The thayne relyric the shari. The licha is lilting. The licha port the thayne. The licha port the trish. The licha relyric the thayne. The licha relyric the shari. The licha does not see the trish. The licha disincline the thayne. The licha disincline the shari. The licha disincline the trish. The shari is onstage. The shari does not need the trish. The shari disincline the thayne. The trish relyric the thayne. If someone relyric the thayne then they visit the licha. If someone is onstage then they see the shari. If someone port the shari and they see the licha then the shari does not see the thayne. If someone relyric the licha and the licha is onstage then the licha disincline the shari. If someone port the shari then the shari is clonic. If someone relyric the shari and the shari relyric the trish then the trish port the shari. If the shari relyric the trish and the shari is not copulatory then the shari is not onstage. If someone is clonic then they see the trish. The trish does not visit the licha.", "logic": "\nnot Onstage(thayne)\nPort(thayne, shari)\nRelyric(thayne, shari)\nLilting(licha)\nPort(licha, thayne)\nPort(licha, trish)\nRelyric(licha, thayne)\nRelyric(licha, shari)\nnot Relyric(licha, trish)\nDisincline(licha, thayne)\nDisincline(licha, shari)\nDisincline(licha, trish)\nOnstage(shari)\nnot Port(shari, trish)\nDisincline(shari, thayne)\nRelyric(trish, thayne)\nforall x (Relyric(x, thayne) -> Disincline(x, licha))\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Relyric(x, shari))\nforall x (Port(x, shari) and Relyric(x, licha) -> not Relyric(shari, thayne))\nforall x (Relyric(x, licha) and Onstage(licha) -> Disincline(licha, shari))\nforall x (Port(x, shari) -> Clonic(shari))\nforall x (Relyric(x, shari) and Relyric(shari, trish) -> Port(trish, shari))\nRelyric(shari, trish) and not Copulatory(shari) -> not Onstage(shari)\nforall x (Clonic(x) -> Relyric(x, trish))\n\nnot Disincline(trish, licha)\n\nRelyric(trish, thayne) and forall x (Relyric(x, thayne) -> Disincline(x, licha)) -> therefore Disincline(trish, licha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The abigail is not unpotted. The abigail telefax the carlene. The abigail hotfoot the carlene. The lawson is undesigned. The lawson telefax the abigail. The lawson telefax the mark. The lawson hotfoot the abigail. The lawson hotfoot the carlene. The lawson does not see the mark. The lawson backslap the abigail. The lawson backslap the carlene. The lawson backslap the mark. The carlene is unpotted. The carlene does not need the mark. The carlene backslap the abigail. The mark hotfoot the abigail. If someone hotfoot the abigail then they visit the lawson. If someone is unpotted then they see the carlene. If someone telefax the carlene and they see the lawson then the carlene does not see the abigail. If someone hotfoot the lawson and the lawson is unpotted then the lawson backslap the carlene. If someone telefax the carlene then the carlene is untalented. If someone hotfoot the carlene and the carlene hotfoot the mark then the mark telefax the carlene. If the carlene hotfoot the mark and the carlene is not watchful then the carlene is not unpotted. If someone is untalented then they see the mark. The carlene hotfoot the mark.", "logic": "\nnot Unpotted(abigail)\nTelefax(abigail, carlene)\nHotfoot(abigail, carlene)\nUndesigned(lawson)\nTelefax(lawson, abigail)\nTelefax(lawson, mark)\nHotfoot(lawson, abigail)\nHotfoot(lawson, carlene)\nnot Hotfoot(lawson, mark)\nBackslap(lawson, abigail)\nBackslap(lawson, carlene)\nBackslap(lawson, mark)\nUnpotted(carlene)\nnot Telefax(carlene, mark)\nBackslap(carlene, abigail)\nHotfoot(mark, abigail)\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, abigail) -> Backslap(x, lawson))\nforall x (Unpotted(x) -> Hotfoot(x, carlene))\nforall x (Telefax(x, carlene) and Hotfoot(x, lawson) -> not Hotfoot(carlene, abigail))\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, lawson) and Unpotted(lawson) -> Backslap(lawson, carlene))\nforall x (Telefax(x, carlene) -> Untalented(carlene))\nforall x (Hotfoot(x, carlene) and Hotfoot(carlene, mark) -> Telefax(mark, carlene))\nHotfoot(carlene, mark) and not Watchful(carlene) -> not Unpotted(carlene)\nforall x (Untalented(x) -> Hotfoot(x, mark))\n\nHotfoot(carlene, mark)\n\nTelefax(abigail, carlene) and forall x (Telefax(x, carlene) -> Untalented(carlene)) -> therefore Untalented(carlene) Untalented(carlene) and forall x (Untalented(x) -> Hotfoot(x, mark)) -> therefore Hotfoot(carlene, mark)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The stearn is not thronged. The stearn allow the ford. The stearn deregulate the ford. The ferd is detachable. The ferd allow the stearn. The ferd allow the ritchie. The ferd deregulate the stearn. The ferd deregulate the ford. The ferd does not see the ritchie. The ferd bake the stearn. The ferd bake the ford. The ferd bake the ritchie. The ford is thronged. The ford does not need the ritchie. The ford bake the stearn. The ritchie deregulate the stearn. If someone deregulate the stearn then they visit the ferd. If someone is thronged then they see the ford. If someone allow the ford and they see the ferd then the ford does not see the stearn. If someone deregulate the ferd and the ferd is thronged then the ferd bake the ford. If someone allow the ford then the ford is apterous. If someone deregulate the ford and the ford deregulate the ritchie then the ritchie allow the ford. If the ford deregulate the ritchie and the ford is not respected then the ford is not thronged. If someone is apterous then they see the ritchie. The ford does not see the ritchie.", "logic": "\nnot Thronged(stearn)\nAllow(stearn, ford)\nDeregulate(stearn, ford)\nDetachable(ferd)\nAllow(ferd, stearn)\nAllow(ferd, ritchie)\nDeregulate(ferd, stearn)\nDeregulate(ferd, ford)\nnot Deregulate(ferd, ritchie)\nBake(ferd, stearn)\nBake(ferd, ford)\nBake(ferd, ritchie)\nThronged(ford)\nnot Allow(ford, ritchie)\nBake(ford, stearn)\nDeregulate(ritchie, stearn)\nforall x (Deregulate(x, stearn) -> Bake(x, ferd))\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Deregulate(x, ford))\nforall x (Allow(x, ford) and Deregulate(x, ferd) -> not Deregulate(ford, stearn))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, ferd) and Thronged(ferd) -> Bake(ferd, ford))\nforall x (Allow(x, ford) -> Apterous(ford))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, ford) and Deregulate(ford, ritchie) -> Allow(ritchie, ford))\nDeregulate(ford, ritchie) and not Respected(ford) -> not Thronged(ford)\nforall x (Apterous(x) -> Deregulate(x, ritchie))\n\nnot Deregulate(ford, ritchie)\n\nAllow(stearn, ford) and forall x (Allow(x, ford) -> Apterous(ford)) -> therefore Apterous(ford) Apterous(ford) and forall x (Apterous(x) -> Deregulate(x, ritchie)) -> therefore Deregulate(ford, ritchie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The karola is not bulbous. The karola eyeball the chadd. The karola colourise the chadd. The jan is brooding. The jan eyeball the karola. The jan eyeball the ishmael. The jan colourise the karola. The jan colourise the chadd. The jan does not see the ishmael. The jan finalise the karola. The jan finalise the chadd. The jan finalise the ishmael. The chadd is bulbous. The chadd does not need the ishmael. The chadd finalise the karola. The ishmael colourise the karola. If someone colourise the karola then they visit the jan. If someone is bulbous then they see the chadd. If someone eyeball the chadd and they see the jan then the chadd does not see the karola. If someone colourise the jan and the jan is bulbous then the jan finalise the chadd. If someone eyeball the chadd then the chadd is bizarre. If someone colourise the chadd and the chadd colourise the ishmael then the ishmael eyeball the chadd. If the chadd colourise the ishmael and the chadd is not symbiotic then the chadd is not bulbous. If someone is bizarre then they see the ishmael. The ishmael eyeball the chadd.", "logic": "\nnot Bulbous(karola)\nEyeball(karola, chadd)\nColourise(karola, chadd)\nBrooding(jan)\nEyeball(jan, karola)\nEyeball(jan, ishmael)\nColourise(jan, karola)\nColourise(jan, chadd)\nnot Colourise(jan, ishmael)\nFinalise(jan, karola)\nFinalise(jan, chadd)\nFinalise(jan, ishmael)\nBulbous(chadd)\nnot Eyeball(chadd, ishmael)\nFinalise(chadd, karola)\nColourise(ishmael, karola)\nforall x (Colourise(x, karola) -> Finalise(x, jan))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) -> Colourise(x, chadd))\nforall x (Eyeball(x, chadd) and Colourise(x, jan) -> not Colourise(chadd, karola))\nforall x (Colourise(x, jan) and Bulbous(jan) -> Finalise(jan, chadd))\nforall x (Eyeball(x, chadd) -> Bizarre(chadd))\nforall x (Colourise(x, chadd) and Colourise(chadd, ishmael) -> Eyeball(ishmael, chadd))\nColourise(chadd, ishmael) and not Symbiotic(chadd) -> not Bulbous(chadd)\nforall x (Bizarre(x) -> Colourise(x, ishmael))\n\nEyeball(ishmael, chadd)\n\nEyeball(karola, chadd) and forall x (Eyeball(x, chadd) -> Bizarre(chadd)) -> therefore Bizarre(chadd) Bizarre(chadd) and forall x (Bizarre(x) -> Colourise(x, ishmael)) -> therefore Colourise(chadd, ishmael) Colourise(karola, chadd) and Colourise(chadd, ishmael) and forall x (Colourise(x, chadd) and Colourise(chadd, ishmael) -> Eyeball(ishmael, chadd)) -> therefore Eyeball(ishmael, chadd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The kerry is not churlish. The kerry export the ibby. The kerry prim the ibby. The gardiner is gruff. The gardiner export the kerry. The gardiner export the vivi. The gardiner prim the kerry. The gardiner prim the ibby. The gardiner does not see the vivi. The gardiner swot the kerry. The gardiner swot the ibby. The gardiner swot the vivi. The ibby is churlish. The ibby does not need the vivi. The ibby swot the kerry. The vivi prim the kerry. If someone prim the kerry then they visit the gardiner. If someone is churlish then they see the ibby. If someone export the ibby and they see the gardiner then the ibby does not see the kerry. If someone prim the gardiner and the gardiner is churlish then the gardiner swot the ibby. If someone export the ibby then the ibby is analog. If someone prim the ibby and the ibby prim the vivi then the vivi export the ibby. If the ibby prim the vivi and the ibby is not cosmogonic then the ibby is not churlish. If someone is analog then they see the vivi. The vivi does not need the ibby.", "logic": "\nnot Churlish(kerry)\nExport(kerry, ibby)\nPrim(kerry, ibby)\nGruff(gardiner)\nExport(gardiner, kerry)\nExport(gardiner, vivi)\nPrim(gardiner, kerry)\nPrim(gardiner, ibby)\nnot Prim(gardiner, vivi)\nSwot(gardiner, kerry)\nSwot(gardiner, ibby)\nSwot(gardiner, vivi)\nChurlish(ibby)\nnot Export(ibby, vivi)\nSwot(ibby, kerry)\nPrim(vivi, kerry)\nforall x (Prim(x, kerry) -> Swot(x, gardiner))\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> Prim(x, ibby))\nforall x (Export(x, ibby) and Prim(x, gardiner) -> not Prim(ibby, kerry))\nforall x (Prim(x, gardiner) and Churlish(gardiner) -> Swot(gardiner, ibby))\nforall x (Export(x, ibby) -> Analog(ibby))\nforall x (Prim(x, ibby) and Prim(ibby, vivi) -> Export(vivi, ibby))\nPrim(ibby, vivi) and not Cosmogonic(ibby) -> not Churlish(ibby)\nforall x (Analog(x) -> Prim(x, vivi))\n\nnot Export(vivi, ibby)\n\nExport(kerry, ibby) and forall x (Export(x, ibby) -> Analog(ibby)) -> therefore Analog(ibby) Analog(ibby) and forall x (Analog(x) -> Prim(x, vivi)) -> therefore Prim(ibby, vivi) Prim(kerry, ibby) and Prim(ibby, vivi) and forall x (Prim(x, ibby) and Prim(ibby, vivi) -> Export(vivi, ibby)) -> therefore Export(vivi, ibby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The brent is not illegal. The brent tuck the xever. The brent tear the xever. The gil is umbellar. The gil tuck the brent. The gil tuck the fabrice. The gil tear the brent. The gil tear the xever. The gil does not see the fabrice. The gil aliment the brent. The gil aliment the xever. The gil aliment the fabrice. The xever is illegal. The xever does not need the fabrice. The xever aliment the brent. The fabrice tear the brent. If someone tear the brent then they visit the gil. If someone is illegal then they see the xever. If someone tuck the xever and they see the gil then the xever does not see the brent. If someone tear the gil and the gil is illegal then the gil aliment the xever. If someone tuck the xever then the xever is ungulated. If someone tear the xever and the xever tear the fabrice then the fabrice tuck the xever. If the xever tear the fabrice and the xever is not amyloid then the xever is not illegal. If someone is ungulated then they see the fabrice. The xever does not visit the gil.", "logic": "\nnot Illegal(brent)\nTuck(brent, xever)\nTear(brent, xever)\nUmbellar(gil)\nTuck(gil, brent)\nTuck(gil, fabrice)\nTear(gil, brent)\nTear(gil, xever)\nnot Tear(gil, fabrice)\nAliment(gil, brent)\nAliment(gil, xever)\nAliment(gil, fabrice)\nIllegal(xever)\nnot Tuck(xever, fabrice)\nAliment(xever, brent)\nTear(fabrice, brent)\nforall x (Tear(x, brent) -> Aliment(x, gil))\nforall x (Illegal(x) -> Tear(x, xever))\nforall x (Tuck(x, xever) and Tear(x, gil) -> not Tear(xever, brent))\nforall x (Tear(x, gil) and Illegal(gil) -> Aliment(gil, xever))\nforall x (Tuck(x, xever) -> Ungulated(xever))\nforall x (Tear(x, xever) and Tear(xever, fabrice) -> Tuck(fabrice, xever))\nTear(xever, fabrice) and not Amyloid(xever) -> not Illegal(xever)\nforall x (Ungulated(x) -> Tear(x, fabrice))\n\nnot Aliment(xever, gil)\n\nforall x (Tear(x, brent) -> Aliment(x, gil)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The marci is not tendinous. The marci steamroll the hymie. The marci struggle the hymie. The renel is forthright. The renel steamroll the marci. The renel steamroll the reuven. The renel struggle the marci. The renel struggle the hymie. The renel does not see the reuven. The renel spud the marci. The renel spud the hymie. The renel spud the reuven. The hymie is tendinous. The hymie does not need the reuven. The hymie spud the marci. The reuven struggle the marci. If someone struggle the marci then they visit the renel. If someone is tendinous then they see the hymie. If someone steamroll the hymie and they see the renel then the hymie does not see the marci. If someone struggle the renel and the renel is tendinous then the renel spud the hymie. If someone steamroll the hymie then the hymie is mastoidal. If someone struggle the hymie and the hymie struggle the reuven then the reuven steamroll the hymie. If the hymie struggle the reuven and the hymie is not cretaceous then the hymie is not tendinous. If someone is mastoidal then they see the reuven. The reuven struggle the hymie.", "logic": "\nnot Tendinous(marci)\nSteamroll(marci, hymie)\nStruggle(marci, hymie)\nForthright(renel)\nSteamroll(renel, marci)\nSteamroll(renel, reuven)\nStruggle(renel, marci)\nStruggle(renel, hymie)\nnot Struggle(renel, reuven)\nSpud(renel, marci)\nSpud(renel, hymie)\nSpud(renel, reuven)\nTendinous(hymie)\nnot Steamroll(hymie, reuven)\nSpud(hymie, marci)\nStruggle(reuven, marci)\nforall x (Struggle(x, marci) -> Spud(x, renel))\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> Struggle(x, hymie))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, hymie) and Struggle(x, renel) -> not Struggle(hymie, marci))\nforall x (Struggle(x, renel) and Tendinous(renel) -> Spud(renel, hymie))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, hymie) -> Mastoidal(hymie))\nforall x (Struggle(x, hymie) and Struggle(hymie, reuven) -> Steamroll(reuven, hymie))\nStruggle(hymie, reuven) and not Cretaceous(hymie) -> not Tendinous(hymie)\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) -> Struggle(x, reuven))\n\nStruggle(reuven, hymie)\n\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> Struggle(x, hymie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The welsh is not fulgent. The welsh stabilize the margareta. The welsh cybernate the margareta. The merrilee is scotch. The merrilee stabilize the welsh. The merrilee stabilize the tull. The merrilee cybernate the welsh. The merrilee cybernate the margareta. The merrilee does not see the tull. The merrilee resettle the welsh. The merrilee resettle the margareta. The merrilee resettle the tull. The margareta is fulgent. The margareta does not need the tull. The margareta resettle the welsh. The tull cybernate the welsh. If someone cybernate the welsh then they visit the merrilee. If someone is fulgent then they see the margareta. If someone stabilize the margareta and they see the merrilee then the margareta does not see the welsh. If someone cybernate the merrilee and the merrilee is fulgent then the merrilee resettle the margareta. If someone stabilize the margareta then the margareta is headless. If someone cybernate the margareta and the margareta cybernate the tull then the tull stabilize the margareta. If the margareta cybernate the tull and the margareta is not unfueled then the margareta is not fulgent. If someone is headless then they see the tull. The welsh does not see the tull.", "logic": "\nnot Fulgent(welsh)\nStabilize(welsh, margareta)\nCybernate(welsh, margareta)\nScotch(merrilee)\nStabilize(merrilee, welsh)\nStabilize(merrilee, tull)\nCybernate(merrilee, welsh)\nCybernate(merrilee, margareta)\nnot Cybernate(merrilee, tull)\nResettle(merrilee, welsh)\nResettle(merrilee, margareta)\nResettle(merrilee, tull)\nFulgent(margareta)\nnot Stabilize(margareta, tull)\nResettle(margareta, welsh)\nCybernate(tull, welsh)\nforall x (Cybernate(x, welsh) -> Resettle(x, merrilee))\nforall x (Fulgent(x) -> Cybernate(x, margareta))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, margareta) and Cybernate(x, merrilee) -> not Cybernate(margareta, welsh))\nforall x (Cybernate(x, merrilee) and Fulgent(merrilee) -> Resettle(merrilee, margareta))\nforall x (Stabilize(x, margareta) -> Headless(margareta))\nforall x (Cybernate(x, margareta) and Cybernate(margareta, tull) -> Stabilize(tull, margareta))\nCybernate(margareta, tull) and not Unfueled(margareta) -> not Fulgent(margareta)\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Cybernate(x, tull))\n\nnot Cybernate(welsh, tull)\n\nforall x (Headless(x) -> Cybernate(x, tull)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The alyson is not frantic. The alyson innervate the sybilla. The alyson desolate the sybilla. The audrie is gelid. The audrie innervate the alyson. The audrie innervate the ilana. The audrie desolate the alyson. The audrie desolate the sybilla. The audrie does not see the ilana. The audrie boom the alyson. The audrie boom the sybilla. The audrie boom the ilana. The sybilla is frantic. The sybilla does not need the ilana. The sybilla boom the alyson. The ilana desolate the alyson. If someone desolate the alyson then they visit the audrie. If someone is frantic then they see the sybilla. If someone innervate the sybilla and they see the audrie then the sybilla does not see the alyson. If someone desolate the audrie and the audrie is frantic then the audrie boom the sybilla. If someone innervate the sybilla then the sybilla is inhumane. If someone desolate the sybilla and the sybilla desolate the ilana then the ilana innervate the sybilla. If the sybilla desolate the ilana and the sybilla is not matt then the sybilla is not frantic. If someone is inhumane then they see the ilana. The ilana desolate the ilana.", "logic": "\nnot Frantic(alyson)\nInnervate(alyson, sybilla)\nDesolate(alyson, sybilla)\nGelid(audrie)\nInnervate(audrie, alyson)\nInnervate(audrie, ilana)\nDesolate(audrie, alyson)\nDesolate(audrie, sybilla)\nnot Desolate(audrie, ilana)\nBoom(audrie, alyson)\nBoom(audrie, sybilla)\nBoom(audrie, ilana)\nFrantic(sybilla)\nnot Innervate(sybilla, ilana)\nBoom(sybilla, alyson)\nDesolate(ilana, alyson)\nforall x (Desolate(x, alyson) -> Boom(x, audrie))\nforall x (Frantic(x) -> Desolate(x, sybilla))\nforall x (Innervate(x, sybilla) and Desolate(x, audrie) -> not Desolate(sybilla, alyson))\nforall x (Desolate(x, audrie) and Frantic(audrie) -> Boom(audrie, sybilla))\nforall x (Innervate(x, sybilla) -> Inhumane(sybilla))\nforall x (Desolate(x, sybilla) and Desolate(sybilla, ilana) -> Innervate(ilana, sybilla))\nDesolate(sybilla, ilana) and not Matt(sybilla) -> not Frantic(sybilla)\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Desolate(x, ilana))\n\nDesolate(ilana, ilana)\n\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Desolate(x, ilana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The vaclav is not abounding. The vaclav cooccur the nancey. The vaclav disrupt the nancey. The delores is temporal. The delores cooccur the vaclav. The delores cooccur the dom. The delores disrupt the vaclav. The delores disrupt the nancey. The delores does not see the dom. The delores dandle the vaclav. The delores dandle the nancey. The delores dandle the dom. The nancey is abounding. The nancey does not need the dom. The nancey dandle the vaclav. The dom disrupt the vaclav. If someone disrupt the vaclav then they visit the delores. If someone is abounding then they see the nancey. If someone cooccur the nancey and they see the delores then the nancey does not see the vaclav. If someone disrupt the delores and the delores is abounding then the delores dandle the nancey. If someone cooccur the nancey then the nancey is monoicous. If someone disrupt the nancey and the nancey disrupt the dom then the dom cooccur the nancey. If the nancey disrupt the dom and the nancey is not permeative then the nancey is not abounding. If someone is monoicous then they see the dom. The vaclav is not temporal.", "logic": "\nnot Abounding(vaclav)\nCooccur(vaclav, nancey)\nDisrupt(vaclav, nancey)\nTemporal(delores)\nCooccur(delores, vaclav)\nCooccur(delores, dom)\nDisrupt(delores, vaclav)\nDisrupt(delores, nancey)\nnot Disrupt(delores, dom)\nDandle(delores, vaclav)\nDandle(delores, nancey)\nDandle(delores, dom)\nAbounding(nancey)\nnot Cooccur(nancey, dom)\nDandle(nancey, vaclav)\nDisrupt(dom, vaclav)\nforall x (Disrupt(x, vaclav) -> Dandle(x, delores))\nforall x (Abounding(x) -> Disrupt(x, nancey))\nforall x (Cooccur(x, nancey) and Disrupt(x, delores) -> not Disrupt(nancey, vaclav))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, delores) and Abounding(delores) -> Dandle(delores, nancey))\nforall x (Cooccur(x, nancey) -> Monoicous(nancey))\nforall x (Disrupt(x, nancey) and Disrupt(nancey, dom) -> Cooccur(dom, nancey))\nDisrupt(nancey, dom) and not Permeative(nancey) -> not Abounding(nancey)\nforall x (Monoicous(x) -> Disrupt(x, dom))\n\nnot Temporal(vaclav)\n\nnot Temporal(vaclav) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The delphine is not pilary. The delphine pauperise the prasun. The delphine empanel the prasun. The brooks is windblown. The brooks pauperise the delphine. The brooks pauperise the rog. The brooks empanel the delphine. The brooks empanel the prasun. The brooks does not see the rog. The brooks oxidize the delphine. The brooks oxidize the prasun. The brooks oxidize the rog. The prasun is pilary. The prasun does not need the rog. The prasun oxidize the delphine. The rog empanel the delphine. If someone empanel the delphine then they visit the brooks. If someone is pilary then they see the prasun. If someone pauperise the prasun and they see the brooks then the prasun does not see the delphine. If someone empanel the brooks and the brooks is pilary then the brooks oxidize the prasun. If someone pauperise the prasun then the prasun is capitulary. If someone empanel the prasun and the prasun empanel the rog then the rog pauperise the prasun. If the prasun empanel the rog and the prasun is not marbleized then the prasun is not pilary. If someone is capitulary then they see the rog. The delphine empanel the brooks.", "logic": "\nnot Pilary(delphine)\nPauperise(delphine, prasun)\nEmpanel(delphine, prasun)\nWindblown(brooks)\nPauperise(brooks, delphine)\nPauperise(brooks, rog)\nEmpanel(brooks, delphine)\nEmpanel(brooks, prasun)\nnot Empanel(brooks, rog)\nOxidize(brooks, delphine)\nOxidize(brooks, prasun)\nOxidize(brooks, rog)\nPilary(prasun)\nnot Pauperise(prasun, rog)\nOxidize(prasun, delphine)\nEmpanel(rog, delphine)\nforall x (Empanel(x, delphine) -> Oxidize(x, brooks))\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Empanel(x, prasun))\nforall x (Pauperise(x, prasun) and Empanel(x, brooks) -> not Empanel(prasun, delphine))\nforall x (Empanel(x, brooks) and Pilary(brooks) -> Oxidize(brooks, prasun))\nforall x (Pauperise(x, prasun) -> Capitulary(prasun))\nforall x (Empanel(x, prasun) and Empanel(prasun, rog) -> Pauperise(rog, prasun))\nEmpanel(prasun, rog) and not Marbleized(prasun) -> not Pilary(prasun)\nforall x (Capitulary(x) -> Empanel(x, rog))\n\nEmpanel(delphine, brooks)\n\nEmpanel(delphine, brooks) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The lynnell is not dirty. The lynnell crease the bride. The lynnell exhort the bride. The leoine is anaphasic. The leoine crease the lynnell. The leoine crease the karilynn. The leoine exhort the lynnell. The leoine exhort the bride. The leoine does not see the karilynn. The leoine sublimate the lynnell. The leoine sublimate the bride. The leoine sublimate the karilynn. The bride is dirty. The bride does not need the karilynn. The bride sublimate the lynnell. The karilynn exhort the lynnell. If someone exhort the lynnell then they visit the leoine. If someone is dirty then they see the bride. If someone crease the bride and they see the leoine then the bride does not see the lynnell. If someone exhort the leoine and the leoine is dirty then the leoine sublimate the bride. If someone crease the bride then the bride is homologic. If someone exhort the bride and the bride exhort the karilynn then the karilynn crease the bride. If the bride exhort the karilynn and the bride is not unposed then the bride is not dirty. If someone is homologic then they see the karilynn. The karilynn is not anaphasic.", "logic": "\nnot Dirty(lynnell)\nCrease(lynnell, bride)\nExhort(lynnell, bride)\nAnaphasic(leoine)\nCrease(leoine, lynnell)\nCrease(leoine, karilynn)\nExhort(leoine, lynnell)\nExhort(leoine, bride)\nnot Exhort(leoine, karilynn)\nSublimate(leoine, lynnell)\nSublimate(leoine, bride)\nSublimate(leoine, karilynn)\nDirty(bride)\nnot Crease(bride, karilynn)\nSublimate(bride, lynnell)\nExhort(karilynn, lynnell)\nforall x (Exhort(x, lynnell) -> Sublimate(x, leoine))\nforall x (Dirty(x) -> Exhort(x, bride))\nforall x (Crease(x, bride) and Exhort(x, leoine) -> not Exhort(bride, lynnell))\nforall x (Exhort(x, leoine) and Dirty(leoine) -> Sublimate(leoine, bride))\nforall x (Crease(x, bride) -> Homologic(bride))\nforall x (Exhort(x, bride) and Exhort(bride, karilynn) -> Crease(karilynn, bride))\nExhort(bride, karilynn) and not Unposed(bride) -> not Dirty(bride)\nforall x (Homologic(x) -> Exhort(x, karilynn))\n\nnot Anaphasic(karilynn)\n\nnot Anaphasic(karilynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "The marcos is not percipient. The marcos dethaw the martina. The marcos institute the martina. The coriss is highbrowed. The coriss dethaw the marcos. The coriss dethaw the bay. The coriss institute the marcos. The coriss institute the martina. The coriss does not see the bay. The coriss flash the marcos. The coriss flash the martina. The coriss flash the bay. The martina is percipient. The martina does not need the bay. The martina flash the marcos. The bay institute the marcos. If someone institute the marcos then they visit the coriss. If someone is percipient then they see the martina. If someone dethaw the martina and they see the coriss then the martina does not see the marcos. If someone institute the coriss and the coriss is percipient then the coriss flash the martina. If someone dethaw the martina then the martina is hebridean. If someone institute the martina and the martina institute the bay then the bay dethaw the martina. If the martina institute the bay and the martina is not noachian then the martina is not percipient. If someone is hebridean then they see the bay. The bay institute the coriss.", "logic": "\nnot Percipient(marcos)\nDethaw(marcos, martina)\nInstitute(marcos, martina)\nHighbrowed(coriss)\nDethaw(coriss, marcos)\nDethaw(coriss, bay)\nInstitute(coriss, marcos)\nInstitute(coriss, martina)\nnot Institute(coriss, bay)\nFlash(coriss, marcos)\nFlash(coriss, martina)\nFlash(coriss, bay)\nPercipient(martina)\nnot Dethaw(martina, bay)\nFlash(martina, marcos)\nInstitute(bay, marcos)\nforall x (Institute(x, marcos) -> Flash(x, coriss))\nforall x (Percipient(x) -> Institute(x, martina))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, martina) and Institute(x, coriss) -> not Institute(martina, marcos))\nforall x (Institute(x, coriss) and Percipient(coriss) -> Flash(coriss, martina))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, martina) -> Hebridean(martina))\nforall x (Institute(x, martina) and Institute(martina, bay) -> Dethaw(bay, martina))\nInstitute(martina, bay) and not Noachian(martina) -> not Percipient(martina)\nforall x (Hebridean(x) -> Institute(x, bay))\n\nInstitute(bay, coriss)\n\nInstitute(bay, coriss) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Melba is continual. Ingaborg is not continual. Maryjo is naif. Erastus is peristylar. If Maryjo is peristylar then Maryjo is not sweltry. White people are naif. If someone is sweltry then they are peristylar. All rollicking people are not inducive. If Maryjo is inducive then Maryjo is continual. If someone is peristylar then they are not sweltry. If someone is sweltry and naif then they are lxxviii. If someone is peristylar and not lxxviii then they are continual. Erastus is peristylar.", "logic": "\nContinual(melba)\nnot Continual(ingaborg)\nNaif(maryjo)\nPeristylar(erastus)\nPeristylar(maryjo) -> not Sweltry(maryjo)\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) -> Naif(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) -> Peristylar(x))\nforall x (Rollicking(x) -> not Inducive(x))\nInducive(maryjo) -> Continual(maryjo)\nforall x (Peristylar(x) -> not Sweltry(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Naif(x) -> Lxxviii(x))\nforall x (Peristylar(x) and not Lxxviii(x) -> Continual(x))\n\nPeristylar(erastus)\n\ntherefore Peristylar(erastus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5481"} {"premises": "Ami is subhuman. Tierney is not subhuman. Giffard is apart. Natalina is amiss. If Giffard is amiss then Giffard is not authorised. White people are apart. If someone is authorised then they are amiss. All potent people are not anabolic. If Giffard is anabolic then Giffard is subhuman. If someone is amiss then they are not authorised. If someone is authorised and apart then they are demoniacal. If someone is amiss and not demoniacal then they are subhuman. Natalina is not amiss.", "logic": "\nSubhuman(ami)\nnot Subhuman(tierney)\nApart(giffard)\nAmiss(natalina)\nAmiss(giffard) -> not Authorised(giffard)\nforall x (Demoniacal(x) -> Apart(x))\nforall x (Authorised(x) -> Amiss(x))\nforall x (Potent(x) -> not Anabolic(x))\nAnabolic(giffard) -> Subhuman(giffard)\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> not Authorised(x))\nforall x (Authorised(x) and Apart(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) and not Demoniacal(x) -> Subhuman(x))\n\nnot Amiss(natalina)\n\ntherefore Amiss(natalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5481"} {"premises": "Tobe is static. Hinda is not static. Zara is pouched. Sasha is brunet. If Zara is brunet then Zara is not partitive. White people are pouched. If someone is partitive then they are brunet. All squab people are not traveled. If Zara is traveled then Zara is static. If someone is brunet then they are not partitive. If someone is partitive and pouched then they are corbelled. If someone is brunet and not corbelled then they are static. Zara is not static.", "logic": "\nStatic(tobe)\nnot Static(hinda)\nPouched(zara)\nBrunet(sasha)\nBrunet(zara) -> not Partitive(zara)\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Pouched(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Brunet(x))\nforall x (Squab(x) -> not Traveled(x))\nTraveled(zara) -> Static(zara)\nforall x (Brunet(x) -> not Partitive(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) and Pouched(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Brunet(x) and not Corbelled(x) -> Static(x))\n\nnot Static(zara)\n\nTraveled(zara) -> Static(zara) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5481"} {"premises": "Daveen is liquid. Trixy is not liquid. Hope is addicted. Alidia is downmarket. If Hope is downmarket then Hope is not removable. White people are addicted. If someone is removable then they are downmarket. All xlvii people are not ungodly. If Hope is ungodly then Hope is liquid. If someone is downmarket then they are not removable. If someone is removable and addicted then they are postnatal. If someone is downmarket and not postnatal then they are liquid. Hope is ungodly.", "logic": "\nLiquid(daveen)\nnot Liquid(trixy)\nAddicted(hope)\nDownmarket(alidia)\nDownmarket(hope) -> not Removable(hope)\nforall x (Postnatal(x) -> Addicted(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) -> Downmarket(x))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> not Ungodly(x))\nUngodly(hope) -> Liquid(hope)\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> not Removable(x))\nforall x (Removable(x) and Addicted(x) -> Postnatal(x))\nforall x (Downmarket(x) and not Postnatal(x) -> Liquid(x))\n\nUngodly(hope)\n\nUngodly(hope) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5481"} {"premises": "The sidoney is unforeseen. The sidoney is aboral. The sidoney is excitant. The sidoney is geared. The sidoney is leggy. Red, unforeseen people are geared. The sidoney is unforeseen.", "logic": "\nUnforeseen(sidoney)\nAboral(sidoney)\nExcitant(sidoney)\nGeared(sidoney)\nLeggy(sidoney)\nforall x (Leggy(x) and Unforeseen(x) -> Geared(x))\n\nUnforeseen(sidoney)\n\ntherefore Unforeseen(sidoney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6175"} {"premises": "The reeva is soiled. The reeva is baseborn. The reeva is hyperfine. The reeva is rightful. The reeva is somnific. Red, soiled people are rightful. The reeva is not somnific.", "logic": "\nSoiled(reeva)\nBaseborn(reeva)\nHyperfine(reeva)\nRightful(reeva)\nSomnific(reeva)\nforall x (Somnific(x) and Soiled(x) -> Rightful(x))\n\nnot Somnific(reeva)\n\ntherefore Somnific(reeva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6175"} {"premises": "The emmeline is deathless. The emmeline is healthy. The emmeline is snobby. The emmeline is amygdaloid. The emmeline is middling. Red, deathless people are amygdaloid. The emmeline does not need the emmeline.", "logic": "\nDeathless(emmeline)\nHealthy(emmeline)\nSnobby(emmeline)\nAmygdaloid(emmeline)\nMiddling(emmeline)\nforall x (Middling(x) and Deathless(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\n\nnot Needs(emmeline, emmeline)\n\nnot Needs(emmeline, emmeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6175"} {"premises": "The gizela is diatomic. The gizela is unbalanced. The gizela is unverified. The gizela is catalectic. The gizela is albinal. Red, diatomic people are catalectic. The gizela visits the gizela.", "logic": "\nDiatomic(gizela)\nUnbalanced(gizela)\nUnverified(gizela)\nCatalectic(gizela)\nAlbinal(gizela)\nforall x (Albinal(x) and Diatomic(x) -> Catalectic(x))\n\nVisits(gizela, gizela)\n\nVisits(gizela, gizela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6175"} {"premises": "The robbert reprize the pepita. The robbert is scrimpy. The robbert is uppish. The pepita is scrimpy. The pepita is foggy. The pepita is uppish. The pepita subdivide the giraud. The pepita caricature the robbert. The annadiana reprize the robbert. The giraud is scrimpy. The giraud is foggy. The giraud is unstained. If someone is foggy and they need the robbert then they see the giraud. If someone subdivide the annadiana and they need the pepita then they see the robbert. If someone is haunted then they need the pepita. If someone subdivide the annadiana then the annadiana is unstained. If someone subdivide the pepita then the pepita subdivide the robbert. If someone is scrimpy and they eat the annadiana then the annadiana caricature the robbert. If someone subdivide the robbert and they eat the annadiana then they are unstained. If someone reprize the robbert then they are haunted. The giraud is scrimpy.", "logic": "\nReprize(robbert, pepita)\nScrimpy(robbert)\nUppish(robbert)\nScrimpy(pepita)\nFoggy(pepita)\nUppish(pepita)\nSubdivide(pepita, giraud)\nCaricature(pepita, robbert)\nReprize(annadiana, robbert)\nScrimpy(giraud)\nFoggy(giraud)\nUnstained(giraud)\nforall x (Foggy(x) and Subdivide(x, robbert) -> Caricature(x, giraud))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, annadiana) and Subdivide(x, pepita) -> Caricature(x, robbert))\nforall x (Haunted(x) -> Subdivide(x, pepita))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, annadiana) -> Unstained(annadiana))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, pepita) -> Subdivide(pepita, robbert))\nforall x (Scrimpy(x) and Reprize(x, annadiana) -> Caricature(annadiana, robbert))\nforall x (Subdivide(x, robbert) and Reprize(x, annadiana) -> Unstained(x))\nforall x (Reprize(x, robbert) -> Haunted(x))\n\nScrimpy(giraud)\n\ntherefore Scrimpy(giraud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The pavla isomerize the abraham. The pavla is permeable. The pavla is mendacious. The abraham is permeable. The abraham is likable. The abraham is mendacious. The abraham salvage the aurilia. The abraham blast the pavla. The bud isomerize the pavla. The aurilia is permeable. The aurilia is likable. The aurilia is pampering. If someone is likable and they need the pavla then they see the aurilia. If someone salvage the bud and they need the abraham then they see the pavla. If someone is demeaning then they need the abraham. If someone salvage the bud then the bud is pampering. If someone salvage the abraham then the abraham salvage the pavla. If someone is permeable and they eat the bud then the bud blast the pavla. If someone salvage the pavla and they eat the bud then they are pampering. If someone isomerize the pavla then they are demeaning. The pavla does not eat the abraham.", "logic": "\nIsomerize(pavla, abraham)\nPermeable(pavla)\nMendacious(pavla)\nPermeable(abraham)\nLikable(abraham)\nMendacious(abraham)\nSalvage(abraham, aurilia)\nBlast(abraham, pavla)\nIsomerize(bud, pavla)\nPermeable(aurilia)\nLikable(aurilia)\nPampering(aurilia)\nforall x (Likable(x) and Salvage(x, pavla) -> Blast(x, aurilia))\nforall x (Salvage(x, bud) and Salvage(x, abraham) -> Blast(x, pavla))\nforall x (Demeaning(x) -> Salvage(x, abraham))\nforall x (Salvage(x, bud) -> Pampering(bud))\nforall x (Salvage(x, abraham) -> Salvage(abraham, pavla))\nforall x (Permeable(x) and Isomerize(x, bud) -> Blast(bud, pavla))\nforall x (Salvage(x, pavla) and Isomerize(x, bud) -> Pampering(x))\nforall x (Isomerize(x, pavla) -> Demeaning(x))\n\nnot Isomerize(pavla, abraham)\n\ntherefore Isomerize(pavla, abraham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The wilmar restrain the geoffrey. The wilmar is queenly. The wilmar is ringlike. The geoffrey is queenly. The geoffrey is sloppy. The geoffrey is ringlike. The geoffrey string the jerome. The geoffrey govern the wilmar. The hilliary restrain the wilmar. The jerome is queenly. The jerome is sloppy. The jerome is suburban. If someone is sloppy and they need the wilmar then they see the jerome. If someone string the hilliary and they need the geoffrey then they see the wilmar. If someone is discovered then they need the geoffrey. If someone string the hilliary then the hilliary is suburban. If someone string the geoffrey then the geoffrey string the wilmar. If someone is queenly and they eat the hilliary then the hilliary govern the wilmar. If someone string the wilmar and they eat the hilliary then they are suburban. If someone restrain the wilmar then they are discovered. The hilliary is discovered.", "logic": "\nRestrain(wilmar, geoffrey)\nQueenly(wilmar)\nRinglike(wilmar)\nQueenly(geoffrey)\nSloppy(geoffrey)\nRinglike(geoffrey)\nString(geoffrey, jerome)\nGovern(geoffrey, wilmar)\nRestrain(hilliary, wilmar)\nQueenly(jerome)\nSloppy(jerome)\nSuburban(jerome)\nforall x (Sloppy(x) and String(x, wilmar) -> Govern(x, jerome))\nforall x (String(x, hilliary) and String(x, geoffrey) -> Govern(x, wilmar))\nforall x (Discovered(x) -> String(x, geoffrey))\nforall x (String(x, hilliary) -> Suburban(hilliary))\nforall x (String(x, geoffrey) -> String(geoffrey, wilmar))\nforall x (Queenly(x) and Restrain(x, hilliary) -> Govern(hilliary, wilmar))\nforall x (String(x, wilmar) and Restrain(x, hilliary) -> Suburban(x))\nforall x (Restrain(x, wilmar) -> Discovered(x))\n\nDiscovered(hilliary)\n\nRestrain(hilliary, wilmar) and forall x (Restrain(x, wilmar) -> Discovered(x)) -> therefore Discovered(hilliary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The muhammad weave the aridatha. The muhammad is receding. The muhammad is wheeled. The aridatha is receding. The aridatha is breathing. The aridatha is wheeled. The aridatha grandstand the edgar. The aridatha buffer the muhammad. The rafaelia weave the muhammad. The edgar is receding. The edgar is breathing. The edgar is basifixed. If someone is breathing and they need the muhammad then they see the edgar. If someone grandstand the rafaelia and they need the aridatha then they see the muhammad. If someone is macabre then they need the aridatha. If someone grandstand the rafaelia then the rafaelia is basifixed. If someone grandstand the aridatha then the aridatha grandstand the muhammad. If someone is receding and they eat the rafaelia then the rafaelia buffer the muhammad. If someone grandstand the muhammad and they eat the rafaelia then they are basifixed. If someone weave the muhammad then they are macabre. The rafaelia is not macabre.", "logic": "\nWeave(muhammad, aridatha)\nReceding(muhammad)\nWheeled(muhammad)\nReceding(aridatha)\nBreathing(aridatha)\nWheeled(aridatha)\nGrandstand(aridatha, edgar)\nBuffer(aridatha, muhammad)\nWeave(rafaelia, muhammad)\nReceding(edgar)\nBreathing(edgar)\nBasifixed(edgar)\nforall x (Breathing(x) and Grandstand(x, muhammad) -> Buffer(x, edgar))\nforall x (Grandstand(x, rafaelia) and Grandstand(x, aridatha) -> Buffer(x, muhammad))\nforall x (Macabre(x) -> Grandstand(x, aridatha))\nforall x (Grandstand(x, rafaelia) -> Basifixed(rafaelia))\nforall x (Grandstand(x, aridatha) -> Grandstand(aridatha, muhammad))\nforall x (Receding(x) and Weave(x, rafaelia) -> Buffer(rafaelia, muhammad))\nforall x (Grandstand(x, muhammad) and Weave(x, rafaelia) -> Basifixed(x))\nforall x (Weave(x, muhammad) -> Macabre(x))\n\nnot Macabre(rafaelia)\n\nWeave(rafaelia, muhammad) and forall x (Weave(x, muhammad) -> Macabre(x)) -> therefore Macabre(rafaelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The linus lowball the wittie. The linus is comparable. The linus is choosey. The wittie is comparable. The wittie is pedate. The wittie is choosey. The wittie theorise the burton. The wittie devastate the linus. The filipe lowball the linus. The burton is comparable. The burton is pedate. The burton is undigested. If someone is pedate and they need the linus then they see the burton. If someone theorise the filipe and they need the wittie then they see the linus. If someone is reasoning then they need the wittie. If someone theorise the filipe then the filipe is undigested. If someone theorise the wittie then the wittie theorise the linus. If someone is comparable and they eat the filipe then the filipe devastate the linus. If someone theorise the linus and they eat the filipe then they are undigested. If someone lowball the linus then they are reasoning. The filipe theorise the wittie.", "logic": "\nLowball(linus, wittie)\nComparable(linus)\nChoosey(linus)\nComparable(wittie)\nPedate(wittie)\nChoosey(wittie)\nTheorise(wittie, burton)\nDevastate(wittie, linus)\nLowball(filipe, linus)\nComparable(burton)\nPedate(burton)\nUndigested(burton)\nforall x (Pedate(x) and Theorise(x, linus) -> Devastate(x, burton))\nforall x (Theorise(x, filipe) and Theorise(x, wittie) -> Devastate(x, linus))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) -> Theorise(x, wittie))\nforall x (Theorise(x, filipe) -> Undigested(filipe))\nforall x (Theorise(x, wittie) -> Theorise(wittie, linus))\nforall x (Comparable(x) and Lowball(x, filipe) -> Devastate(filipe, linus))\nforall x (Theorise(x, linus) and Lowball(x, filipe) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Lowball(x, linus) -> Reasoning(x))\n\nTheorise(filipe, wittie)\n\nLowball(filipe, linus) and forall x (Lowball(x, linus) -> Reasoning(x)) -> therefore Reasoning(filipe) Reasoning(filipe) and forall x (Reasoning(x) -> Theorise(x, wittie)) -> therefore Theorise(filipe, wittie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The odessa dehumanise the jorge. The odessa is unrhymed. The odessa is agonising. The jorge is unrhymed. The jorge is interior. The jorge is agonising. The jorge glance the carlyle. The jorge sinter the odessa. The mady dehumanise the odessa. The carlyle is unrhymed. The carlyle is interior. The carlyle is grubby. If someone is interior and they need the odessa then they see the carlyle. If someone glance the mady and they need the jorge then they see the odessa. If someone is hasty then they need the jorge. If someone glance the mady then the mady is grubby. If someone glance the jorge then the jorge glance the odessa. If someone is unrhymed and they eat the mady then the mady sinter the odessa. If someone glance the odessa and they eat the mady then they are grubby. If someone dehumanise the odessa then they are hasty. The mady does not need the jorge.", "logic": "\nDehumanise(odessa, jorge)\nUnrhymed(odessa)\nAgonising(odessa)\nUnrhymed(jorge)\nInterior(jorge)\nAgonising(jorge)\nGlance(jorge, carlyle)\nSinter(jorge, odessa)\nDehumanise(mady, odessa)\nUnrhymed(carlyle)\nInterior(carlyle)\nGrubby(carlyle)\nforall x (Interior(x) and Glance(x, odessa) -> Sinter(x, carlyle))\nforall x (Glance(x, mady) and Glance(x, jorge) -> Sinter(x, odessa))\nforall x (Hasty(x) -> Glance(x, jorge))\nforall x (Glance(x, mady) -> Grubby(mady))\nforall x (Glance(x, jorge) -> Glance(jorge, odessa))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and Dehumanise(x, mady) -> Sinter(mady, odessa))\nforall x (Glance(x, odessa) and Dehumanise(x, mady) -> Grubby(x))\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, odessa) -> Hasty(x))\n\nnot Glance(mady, jorge)\n\nDehumanise(mady, odessa) and forall x (Dehumanise(x, odessa) -> Hasty(x)) -> therefore Hasty(mady) Hasty(mady) and forall x (Hasty(x) -> Glance(x, jorge)) -> therefore Glance(mady, jorge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The theodora pettifog the faunie. The theodora is snobby. The theodora is existing. The faunie is snobby. The faunie is seismic. The faunie is existing. The faunie whirr the staffard. The faunie kill the theodora. The ethelred pettifog the theodora. The staffard is snobby. The staffard is seismic. The staffard is frivolous. If someone is seismic and they need the theodora then they see the staffard. If someone whirr the ethelred and they need the faunie then they see the theodora. If someone is vagal then they need the faunie. If someone whirr the ethelred then the ethelred is frivolous. If someone whirr the faunie then the faunie whirr the theodora. If someone is snobby and they eat the ethelred then the ethelred kill the theodora. If someone whirr the theodora and they eat the ethelred then they are frivolous. If someone pettifog the theodora then they are vagal. The faunie whirr the theodora.", "logic": "\nPettifog(theodora, faunie)\nSnobby(theodora)\nExisting(theodora)\nSnobby(faunie)\nSeismic(faunie)\nExisting(faunie)\nWhirr(faunie, staffard)\nKill(faunie, theodora)\nPettifog(ethelred, theodora)\nSnobby(staffard)\nSeismic(staffard)\nFrivolous(staffard)\nforall x (Seismic(x) and Whirr(x, theodora) -> Kill(x, staffard))\nforall x (Whirr(x, ethelred) and Whirr(x, faunie) -> Kill(x, theodora))\nforall x (Vagal(x) -> Whirr(x, faunie))\nforall x (Whirr(x, ethelred) -> Frivolous(ethelred))\nforall x (Whirr(x, faunie) -> Whirr(faunie, theodora))\nforall x (Snobby(x) and Pettifog(x, ethelred) -> Kill(ethelred, theodora))\nforall x (Whirr(x, theodora) and Pettifog(x, ethelred) -> Frivolous(x))\nforall x (Pettifog(x, theodora) -> Vagal(x))\n\nWhirr(faunie, theodora)\n\nPettifog(ethelred, theodora) and forall x (Pettifog(x, theodora) -> Vagal(x)) -> therefore Vagal(ethelred) Vagal(ethelred) and forall x (Vagal(x) -> Whirr(x, faunie)) -> therefore Whirr(ethelred, faunie) Whirr(ethelred, faunie) and forall x (Whirr(x, faunie) -> Whirr(faunie, theodora)) -> therefore Whirr(faunie, theodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The magdalena upbraid the goldi. The magdalena is juridic. The magdalena is pure. The goldi is juridic. The goldi is araneidan. The goldi is pure. The goldi splinter the tabbie. The goldi desiccate the magdalena. The tessa upbraid the magdalena. The tabbie is juridic. The tabbie is araneidan. The tabbie is braggy. If someone is araneidan and they need the magdalena then they see the tabbie. If someone splinter the tessa and they need the goldi then they see the magdalena. If someone is serious then they need the goldi. If someone splinter the tessa then the tessa is braggy. If someone splinter the goldi then the goldi splinter the magdalena. If someone is juridic and they eat the tessa then the tessa desiccate the magdalena. If someone splinter the magdalena and they eat the tessa then they are braggy. If someone upbraid the magdalena then they are serious. The goldi does not need the magdalena.", "logic": "\nUpbraid(magdalena, goldi)\nJuridic(magdalena)\nPure(magdalena)\nJuridic(goldi)\nAraneidan(goldi)\nPure(goldi)\nSplinter(goldi, tabbie)\nDesiccate(goldi, magdalena)\nUpbraid(tessa, magdalena)\nJuridic(tabbie)\nAraneidan(tabbie)\nBraggy(tabbie)\nforall x (Araneidan(x) and Splinter(x, magdalena) -> Desiccate(x, tabbie))\nforall x (Splinter(x, tessa) and Splinter(x, goldi) -> Desiccate(x, magdalena))\nforall x (Serious(x) -> Splinter(x, goldi))\nforall x (Splinter(x, tessa) -> Braggy(tessa))\nforall x (Splinter(x, goldi) -> Splinter(goldi, magdalena))\nforall x (Juridic(x) and Upbraid(x, tessa) -> Desiccate(tessa, magdalena))\nforall x (Splinter(x, magdalena) and Upbraid(x, tessa) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Upbraid(x, magdalena) -> Serious(x))\n\nnot Splinter(goldi, magdalena)\n\nUpbraid(tessa, magdalena) and forall x (Upbraid(x, magdalena) -> Serious(x)) -> therefore Serious(tessa) Serious(tessa) and forall x (Serious(x) -> Splinter(x, goldi)) -> therefore Splinter(tessa, goldi) Splinter(tessa, goldi) and forall x (Splinter(x, goldi) -> Splinter(goldi, magdalena)) -> therefore Splinter(goldi, magdalena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The ingaborg unionize the pablo. The ingaborg is waste. The ingaborg is latino. The pablo is waste. The pablo is engraved. The pablo is latino. The pablo malign the deirdre. The pablo anele the ingaborg. The adelina unionize the ingaborg. The deirdre is waste. The deirdre is engraved. The deirdre is touchy. If someone is engraved and they need the ingaborg then they see the deirdre. If someone malign the adelina and they need the pablo then they see the ingaborg. If someone is stooping then they need the pablo. If someone malign the adelina then the adelina is touchy. If someone malign the pablo then the pablo malign the ingaborg. If someone is waste and they eat the adelina then the adelina anele the ingaborg. If someone malign the ingaborg and they eat the adelina then they are touchy. If someone unionize the ingaborg then they are stooping. The deirdre is not stooping.", "logic": "\nUnionize(ingaborg, pablo)\nWaste(ingaborg)\nLatino(ingaborg)\nWaste(pablo)\nEngraved(pablo)\nLatino(pablo)\nMalign(pablo, deirdre)\nAnele(pablo, ingaborg)\nUnionize(adelina, ingaborg)\nWaste(deirdre)\nEngraved(deirdre)\nTouchy(deirdre)\nforall x (Engraved(x) and Malign(x, ingaborg) -> Anele(x, deirdre))\nforall x (Malign(x, adelina) and Malign(x, pablo) -> Anele(x, ingaborg))\nforall x (Stooping(x) -> Malign(x, pablo))\nforall x (Malign(x, adelina) -> Touchy(adelina))\nforall x (Malign(x, pablo) -> Malign(pablo, ingaborg))\nforall x (Waste(x) and Unionize(x, adelina) -> Anele(adelina, ingaborg))\nforall x (Malign(x, ingaborg) and Unionize(x, adelina) -> Touchy(x))\nforall x (Unionize(x, ingaborg) -> Stooping(x))\n\nnot Stooping(deirdre)\n\nforall x (Unionize(x, ingaborg) -> Stooping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The krissie hint the maryrose. The krissie is theocratic. The krissie is lovesome. The maryrose is theocratic. The maryrose is floodlit. The maryrose is lovesome. The maryrose poultice the evie. The maryrose spring the krissie. The brett hint the krissie. The evie is theocratic. The evie is floodlit. The evie is expensive. If someone is floodlit and they need the krissie then they see the evie. If someone poultice the brett and they need the maryrose then they see the krissie. If someone is enviable then they need the maryrose. If someone poultice the brett then the brett is expensive. If someone poultice the maryrose then the maryrose poultice the krissie. If someone is theocratic and they eat the brett then the brett spring the krissie. If someone poultice the krissie and they eat the brett then they are expensive. If someone hint the krissie then they are enviable. The maryrose is expensive.", "logic": "\nHint(krissie, maryrose)\nTheocratic(krissie)\nLovesome(krissie)\nTheocratic(maryrose)\nFloodlit(maryrose)\nLovesome(maryrose)\nPoultice(maryrose, evie)\nSpring(maryrose, krissie)\nHint(brett, krissie)\nTheocratic(evie)\nFloodlit(evie)\nExpensive(evie)\nforall x (Floodlit(x) and Poultice(x, krissie) -> Spring(x, evie))\nforall x (Poultice(x, brett) and Poultice(x, maryrose) -> Spring(x, krissie))\nforall x (Enviable(x) -> Poultice(x, maryrose))\nforall x (Poultice(x, brett) -> Expensive(brett))\nforall x (Poultice(x, maryrose) -> Poultice(maryrose, krissie))\nforall x (Theocratic(x) and Hint(x, brett) -> Spring(brett, krissie))\nforall x (Poultice(x, krissie) and Hint(x, brett) -> Expensive(x))\nforall x (Hint(x, krissie) -> Enviable(x))\n\nExpensive(maryrose)\n\nforall x (Poultice(x, krissie) and Hint(x, brett) -> Expensive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The fonsie cede the larisa. The fonsie is blooded. The fonsie is dusky. The larisa is blooded. The larisa is threescore. The larisa is dusky. The larisa dismount the amargo. The larisa patinize the fonsie. The rutger cede the fonsie. The amargo is blooded. The amargo is threescore. The amargo is revised. If someone is threescore and they need the fonsie then they see the amargo. If someone dismount the rutger and they need the larisa then they see the fonsie. If someone is persian then they need the larisa. If someone dismount the rutger then the rutger is revised. If someone dismount the larisa then the larisa dismount the fonsie. If someone is blooded and they eat the rutger then the rutger patinize the fonsie. If someone dismount the fonsie and they eat the rutger then they are revised. If someone cede the fonsie then they are persian. The fonsie is not persian.", "logic": "\nCede(fonsie, larisa)\nBlooded(fonsie)\nDusky(fonsie)\nBlooded(larisa)\nThreescore(larisa)\nDusky(larisa)\nDismount(larisa, amargo)\nPatinize(larisa, fonsie)\nCede(rutger, fonsie)\nBlooded(amargo)\nThreescore(amargo)\nRevised(amargo)\nforall x (Threescore(x) and Dismount(x, fonsie) -> Patinize(x, amargo))\nforall x (Dismount(x, rutger) and Dismount(x, larisa) -> Patinize(x, fonsie))\nforall x (Persian(x) -> Dismount(x, larisa))\nforall x (Dismount(x, rutger) -> Revised(rutger))\nforall x (Dismount(x, larisa) -> Dismount(larisa, fonsie))\nforall x (Blooded(x) and Cede(x, rutger) -> Patinize(rutger, fonsie))\nforall x (Dismount(x, fonsie) and Cede(x, rutger) -> Revised(x))\nforall x (Cede(x, fonsie) -> Persian(x))\n\nnot Persian(fonsie)\n\nforall x (Cede(x, fonsie) -> Persian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The ivette salute the orelee. The ivette is stressed. The ivette is sericeous. The orelee is stressed. The orelee is soured. The orelee is sericeous. The orelee relegate the abigale. The orelee reposit the ivette. The robyn salute the ivette. The abigale is stressed. The abigale is soured. The abigale is linguistic. If someone is soured and they need the ivette then they see the abigale. If someone relegate the robyn and they need the orelee then they see the ivette. If someone is bursal then they need the orelee. If someone relegate the robyn then the robyn is linguistic. If someone relegate the orelee then the orelee relegate the ivette. If someone is stressed and they eat the robyn then the robyn reposit the ivette. If someone relegate the ivette and they eat the robyn then they are linguistic. If someone salute the ivette then they are bursal. The orelee is bursal.", "logic": "\nSalute(ivette, orelee)\nStressed(ivette)\nSericeous(ivette)\nStressed(orelee)\nSoured(orelee)\nSericeous(orelee)\nRelegate(orelee, abigale)\nReposit(orelee, ivette)\nSalute(robyn, ivette)\nStressed(abigale)\nSoured(abigale)\nLinguistic(abigale)\nforall x (Soured(x) and Relegate(x, ivette) -> Reposit(x, abigale))\nforall x (Relegate(x, robyn) and Relegate(x, orelee) -> Reposit(x, ivette))\nforall x (Bursal(x) -> Relegate(x, orelee))\nforall x (Relegate(x, robyn) -> Linguistic(robyn))\nforall x (Relegate(x, orelee) -> Relegate(orelee, ivette))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and Salute(x, robyn) -> Reposit(robyn, ivette))\nforall x (Relegate(x, ivette) and Salute(x, robyn) -> Linguistic(x))\nforall x (Salute(x, ivette) -> Bursal(x))\n\nBursal(orelee)\n\nforall x (Salute(x, ivette) -> Bursal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The maura concenter the olga. The maura is bitterish. The maura is aurorean. The olga is bitterish. The olga is cxlv. The olga is aurorean. The olga anodise the joelly. The olga chord the maura. The vale concenter the maura. The joelly is bitterish. The joelly is cxlv. The joelly is actinic. If someone is cxlv and they need the maura then they see the joelly. If someone anodise the vale and they need the olga then they see the maura. If someone is unwonted then they need the olga. If someone anodise the vale then the vale is actinic. If someone anodise the olga then the olga anodise the maura. If someone is bitterish and they eat the vale then the vale chord the maura. If someone anodise the maura and they eat the vale then they are actinic. If someone concenter the maura then they are unwonted. The olga does not see the vale.", "logic": "\nConcenter(maura, olga)\nBitterish(maura)\nAurorean(maura)\nBitterish(olga)\nCxlv(olga)\nAurorean(olga)\nAnodise(olga, joelly)\nChord(olga, maura)\nConcenter(vale, maura)\nBitterish(joelly)\nCxlv(joelly)\nActinic(joelly)\nforall x (Cxlv(x) and Anodise(x, maura) -> Chord(x, joelly))\nforall x (Anodise(x, vale) and Anodise(x, olga) -> Chord(x, maura))\nforall x (Unwonted(x) -> Anodise(x, olga))\nforall x (Anodise(x, vale) -> Actinic(vale))\nforall x (Anodise(x, olga) -> Anodise(olga, maura))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and Concenter(x, vale) -> Chord(vale, maura))\nforall x (Anodise(x, maura) and Concenter(x, vale) -> Actinic(x))\nforall x (Concenter(x, maura) -> Unwonted(x))\n\nnot Chord(olga, vale)\n\nnot Chord(olga, vale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The mika sandbag the hanson. The mika is unfailing. The mika is exanimate. The hanson is unfailing. The hanson is greyed. The hanson is exanimate. The hanson think the augustin. The hanson shrivel the mika. The hildy sandbag the mika. The augustin is unfailing. The augustin is greyed. The augustin is upfront. If someone is greyed and they need the mika then they see the augustin. If someone think the hildy and they need the hanson then they see the mika. If someone is squeamish then they need the hanson. If someone think the hildy then the hildy is upfront. If someone think the hanson then the hanson think the mika. If someone is unfailing and they eat the hildy then the hildy shrivel the mika. If someone think the mika and they eat the hildy then they are upfront. If someone sandbag the mika then they are squeamish. The augustin is exanimate.", "logic": "\nSandbag(mika, hanson)\nUnfailing(mika)\nExanimate(mika)\nUnfailing(hanson)\nGreyed(hanson)\nExanimate(hanson)\nThink(hanson, augustin)\nShrivel(hanson, mika)\nSandbag(hildy, mika)\nUnfailing(augustin)\nGreyed(augustin)\nUpfront(augustin)\nforall x (Greyed(x) and Think(x, mika) -> Shrivel(x, augustin))\nforall x (Think(x, hildy) and Think(x, hanson) -> Shrivel(x, mika))\nforall x (Squeamish(x) -> Think(x, hanson))\nforall x (Think(x, hildy) -> Upfront(hildy))\nforall x (Think(x, hanson) -> Think(hanson, mika))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) and Sandbag(x, hildy) -> Shrivel(hildy, mika))\nforall x (Think(x, mika) and Sandbag(x, hildy) -> Upfront(x))\nforall x (Sandbag(x, mika) -> Squeamish(x))\n\nExanimate(augustin)\n\nExanimate(augustin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The marilu whir the melodee. The marilu is endoergic. The marilu is cruel. The melodee is endoergic. The melodee is realized. The melodee is cruel. The melodee dynamize the dorree. The melodee islamise the marilu. The merrily whir the marilu. The dorree is endoergic. The dorree is realized. The dorree is winsome. If someone is realized and they need the marilu then they see the dorree. If someone dynamize the merrily and they need the melodee then they see the marilu. If someone is solemn then they need the melodee. If someone dynamize the merrily then the merrily is winsome. If someone dynamize the melodee then the melodee dynamize the marilu. If someone is endoergic and they eat the merrily then the merrily islamise the marilu. If someone dynamize the marilu and they eat the merrily then they are winsome. If someone whir the marilu then they are solemn. The melodee does not eat the marilu.", "logic": "\nWhir(marilu, melodee)\nEndoergic(marilu)\nCruel(marilu)\nEndoergic(melodee)\nRealized(melodee)\nCruel(melodee)\nDynamize(melodee, dorree)\nIslamise(melodee, marilu)\nWhir(merrily, marilu)\nEndoergic(dorree)\nRealized(dorree)\nWinsome(dorree)\nforall x (Realized(x) and Dynamize(x, marilu) -> Islamise(x, dorree))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, merrily) and Dynamize(x, melodee) -> Islamise(x, marilu))\nforall x (Solemn(x) -> Dynamize(x, melodee))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, merrily) -> Winsome(merrily))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, melodee) -> Dynamize(melodee, marilu))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and Whir(x, merrily) -> Islamise(merrily, marilu))\nforall x (Dynamize(x, marilu) and Whir(x, merrily) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Whir(x, marilu) -> Solemn(x))\n\nnot Whir(melodee, marilu)\n\nnot Whir(melodee, marilu) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "The sussi imbibe the hilde. The sussi is rectal. The sussi is bichrome. The hilde is rectal. The hilde is unkindly. The hilde is bichrome. The hilde dethaw the ginny. The hilde fecundate the sussi. The charlott imbibe the sussi. The ginny is rectal. The ginny is unkindly. The ginny is getatable. If someone is unkindly and they need the sussi then they see the ginny. If someone dethaw the charlott and they need the hilde then they see the sussi. If someone is eyed then they need the hilde. If someone dethaw the charlott then the charlott is getatable. If someone dethaw the hilde then the hilde dethaw the sussi. If someone is rectal and they eat the charlott then the charlott fecundate the sussi. If someone dethaw the sussi and they eat the charlott then they are getatable. If someone imbibe the sussi then they are eyed. The charlott fecundate the charlott.", "logic": "\nImbibe(sussi, hilde)\nRectal(sussi)\nBichrome(sussi)\nRectal(hilde)\nUnkindly(hilde)\nBichrome(hilde)\nDethaw(hilde, ginny)\nFecundate(hilde, sussi)\nImbibe(charlott, sussi)\nRectal(ginny)\nUnkindly(ginny)\nGetatable(ginny)\nforall x (Unkindly(x) and Dethaw(x, sussi) -> Fecundate(x, ginny))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, charlott) and Dethaw(x, hilde) -> Fecundate(x, sussi))\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Dethaw(x, hilde))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, charlott) -> Getatable(charlott))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, hilde) -> Dethaw(hilde, sussi))\nforall x (Rectal(x) and Imbibe(x, charlott) -> Fecundate(charlott, sussi))\nforall x (Dethaw(x, sussi) and Imbibe(x, charlott) -> Getatable(x))\nforall x (Imbibe(x, sussi) -> Eyed(x))\n\nFecundate(charlott, charlott)\n\nFecundate(charlott, charlott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-73"} {"premises": "Mariska is topologic. Mariska is repeatable. Mariska is statuesque. Mariska is praetorial. Mariska is stoppable. Mariska is cyprinoid. Mariska is calcific. If something is calcific then it is cyprinoid. If Mariska is topologic then Mariska is calcific. If something is stoppable and statuesque then it is repeatable. If something is praetorial and statuesque then it is stoppable. Round, topologic things are repeatable. All praetorial, repeatable things are stoppable. If something is repeatable then it is stoppable. Nice things are cyprinoid. Mariska is topologic.", "logic": "\nTopologic(mariska)\nRepeatable(mariska)\nStatuesque(mariska)\nPraetorial(mariska)\nStoppable(mariska)\nCyprinoid(mariska)\nCalcific(mariska)\nforall x (Calcific(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nTopologic(mariska) -> Calcific(mariska)\nforall x (Stoppable(x) and Statuesque(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) and Statuesque(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nforall x (Stoppable(x) and Topologic(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) and Repeatable(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nforall x (Repeatable(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\n\nTopologic(mariska)\n\ntherefore Topologic(mariska)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4868"} {"premises": "Fabio is obscure. Fabio is jugular. Fabio is perturbing. Fabio is moral. Fabio is bitterish. Fabio is aliphatic. Fabio is paralyzed. If something is paralyzed then it is aliphatic. If Fabio is obscure then Fabio is paralyzed. If something is bitterish and perturbing then it is jugular. If something is moral and perturbing then it is bitterish. Round, obscure things are jugular. All moral, jugular things are bitterish. If something is jugular then it is bitterish. Nice things are aliphatic. Fabio is not obscure.", "logic": "\nObscure(fabio)\nJugular(fabio)\nPerturbing(fabio)\nMoral(fabio)\nBitterish(fabio)\nAliphatic(fabio)\nParalyzed(fabio)\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> Aliphatic(x))\nObscure(fabio) -> Paralyzed(fabio)\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and Perturbing(x) -> Jugular(x))\nforall x (Moral(x) and Perturbing(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and Obscure(x) -> Jugular(x))\nforall x (Moral(x) and Jugular(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Jugular(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Jugular(x) -> Aliphatic(x))\n\nnot Obscure(fabio)\n\ntherefore Obscure(fabio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4868"} {"premises": "The tildy baulk the frederich. The tildy is sinusoidal. The tildy is congruent. The tildy honour the frederich. The frederich is not sinusoidal. The frederich is not awry. The frederich corrugate the tildy. If something is elective and not congruent then it honour the frederich. If something corrugate the tildy then the tildy corrugate the frederich. If something honour the tildy and it corrugate the tildy then the tildy is not elective. If the frederich is splashed then the frederich baulk the tildy. If the tildy corrugate the frederich then the tildy is not awry. If something honour the frederich then the frederich is not awry. If something honour the frederich then the frederich honour the tildy. If something corrugate the tildy and the tildy is not awry then it does not eat the frederich. The frederich is not sinusoidal.", "logic": "\nBaulk(tildy, frederich)\nSinusoidal(tildy)\nCongruent(tildy)\nHonour(tildy, frederich)\nnot Sinusoidal(frederich)\nnot Awry(frederich)\nCorrugate(frederich, tildy)\nforall x (Elective(x) and not Congruent(x) -> Honour(x, frederich))\nforall x (Corrugate(x, tildy) -> Corrugate(tildy, frederich))\nforall x (Honour(x, tildy) and Corrugate(x, tildy) -> not Elective(tildy))\nSplashed(frederich) -> Baulk(frederich, tildy)\nCorrugate(tildy, frederich) -> not Awry(tildy)\nforall x (Honour(x, frederich) -> not Awry(frederich))\nforall x (Honour(x, frederich) -> Honour(frederich, tildy))\nforall x (Corrugate(x, tildy) and not Awry(tildy) -> not Baulk(x, frederich))\n\nnot Sinusoidal(frederich)\n\ntherefore not Sinusoidal(frederich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The muire egress the ebony. The muire is canty. The muire is sensitized. The muire inventory the ebony. The ebony is not canty. The ebony is not operose. The ebony redevelop the muire. If something is unbordered and not sensitized then it inventory the ebony. If something redevelop the muire then the muire redevelop the ebony. If something inventory the muire and it redevelop the muire then the muire is not unbordered. If the ebony is oaten then the ebony egress the muire. If the muire redevelop the ebony then the muire is not operose. If something inventory the ebony then the ebony is not operose. If something inventory the ebony then the ebony inventory the muire. If something redevelop the muire and the muire is not operose then it does not eat the ebony. The ebony is operose.", "logic": "\nEgress(muire, ebony)\nCanty(muire)\nSensitized(muire)\nInventory(muire, ebony)\nnot Canty(ebony)\nnot Operose(ebony)\nRedevelop(ebony, muire)\nforall x (Unbordered(x) and not Sensitized(x) -> Inventory(x, ebony))\nforall x (Redevelop(x, muire) -> Redevelop(muire, ebony))\nforall x (Inventory(x, muire) and Redevelop(x, muire) -> not Unbordered(muire))\nOaten(ebony) -> Egress(ebony, muire)\nRedevelop(muire, ebony) -> not Operose(muire)\nforall x (Inventory(x, ebony) -> not Operose(ebony))\nforall x (Inventory(x, ebony) -> Inventory(ebony, muire))\nforall x (Redevelop(x, muire) and not Operose(muire) -> not Egress(x, ebony))\n\nOperose(ebony)\n\ntherefore not Operose(ebony)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The ardenia stretch the justin. The ardenia is allergenic. The ardenia is untutored. The ardenia pitchfork the justin. The justin is not allergenic. The justin is not epistolary. The justin coordinate the ardenia. If something is monetary and not untutored then it pitchfork the justin. If something coordinate the ardenia then the ardenia coordinate the justin. If something pitchfork the ardenia and it coordinate the ardenia then the ardenia is not monetary. If the justin is tabu then the justin stretch the ardenia. If the ardenia coordinate the justin then the ardenia is not epistolary. If something pitchfork the justin then the justin is not epistolary. If something pitchfork the justin then the justin pitchfork the ardenia. If something coordinate the ardenia and the ardenia is not epistolary then it does not eat the justin. The justin pitchfork the ardenia.", "logic": "\nStretch(ardenia, justin)\nAllergenic(ardenia)\nUntutored(ardenia)\nPitchfork(ardenia, justin)\nnot Allergenic(justin)\nnot Epistolary(justin)\nCoordinate(justin, ardenia)\nforall x (Monetary(x) and not Untutored(x) -> Pitchfork(x, justin))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, ardenia) -> Coordinate(ardenia, justin))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, ardenia) and Coordinate(x, ardenia) -> not Monetary(ardenia))\nTabu(justin) -> Stretch(justin, ardenia)\nCoordinate(ardenia, justin) -> not Epistolary(ardenia)\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, justin) -> not Epistolary(justin))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, justin) -> Pitchfork(justin, ardenia))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, ardenia) and not Epistolary(ardenia) -> not Stretch(x, justin))\n\nPitchfork(justin, ardenia)\n\nPitchfork(ardenia, justin) and forall x (Pitchfork(x, justin) -> Pitchfork(justin, ardenia)) -> therefore Pitchfork(justin, ardenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The blair politick the walsh. The blair is voluminous. The blair is mighty. The blair cower the walsh. The walsh is not voluminous. The walsh is not apiculate. The walsh geminate the blair. If something is tricolor and not mighty then it cower the walsh. If something geminate the blair then the blair geminate the walsh. If something cower the blair and it geminate the blair then the blair is not tricolor. If the walsh is furrowed then the walsh politick the blair. If the blair geminate the walsh then the blair is not apiculate. If something cower the walsh then the walsh is not apiculate. If something cower the walsh then the walsh cower the blair. If something geminate the blair and the blair is not apiculate then it does not eat the walsh. The blair does not visit the walsh.", "logic": "\nPolitick(blair, walsh)\nVoluminous(blair)\nMighty(blair)\nCower(blair, walsh)\nnot Voluminous(walsh)\nnot Apiculate(walsh)\nGeminate(walsh, blair)\nforall x (Tricolor(x) and not Mighty(x) -> Cower(x, walsh))\nforall x (Geminate(x, blair) -> Geminate(blair, walsh))\nforall x (Cower(x, blair) and Geminate(x, blair) -> not Tricolor(blair))\nFurrowed(walsh) -> Politick(walsh, blair)\nGeminate(blair, walsh) -> not Apiculate(blair)\nforall x (Cower(x, walsh) -> not Apiculate(walsh))\nforall x (Cower(x, walsh) -> Cower(walsh, blair))\nforall x (Geminate(x, blair) and not Apiculate(blair) -> not Politick(x, walsh))\n\nnot Geminate(blair, walsh)\n\nGeminate(walsh, blair) and forall x (Geminate(x, blair) -> Geminate(blair, walsh)) -> therefore Geminate(blair, walsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The zach jerk the stephani. The zach is speckless. The zach is intensive. The zach bone the stephani. The stephani is not speckless. The stephani is not aminic. The stephani execute the zach. If something is brimless and not intensive then it bone the stephani. If something execute the zach then the zach execute the stephani. If something bone the zach and it execute the zach then the zach is not brimless. If the stephani is unsmiling then the stephani jerk the zach. If the zach execute the stephani then the zach is not aminic. If something bone the stephani then the stephani is not aminic. If something bone the stephani then the stephani bone the zach. If something execute the zach and the zach is not aminic then it does not eat the stephani. The zach is not aminic.", "logic": "\nJerk(zach, stephani)\nSpeckless(zach)\nIntensive(zach)\nBone(zach, stephani)\nnot Speckless(stephani)\nnot Aminic(stephani)\nExecute(stephani, zach)\nforall x (Brimless(x) and not Intensive(x) -> Bone(x, stephani))\nforall x (Execute(x, zach) -> Execute(zach, stephani))\nforall x (Bone(x, zach) and Execute(x, zach) -> not Brimless(zach))\nUnsmiling(stephani) -> Jerk(stephani, zach)\nExecute(zach, stephani) -> not Aminic(zach)\nforall x (Bone(x, stephani) -> not Aminic(stephani))\nforall x (Bone(x, stephani) -> Bone(stephani, zach))\nforall x (Execute(x, zach) and not Aminic(zach) -> not Jerk(x, stephani))\n\nnot Aminic(zach)\n\nExecute(stephani, zach) and forall x (Execute(x, zach) -> Execute(zach, stephani)) -> therefore Execute(zach, stephani) Execute(zach, stephani) and Execute(zach, stephani) -> not Aminic(zach) -> therefore not Aminic(zach)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The albatros besmirch the abbey. The albatros is carbonic. The albatros is ennobling. The albatros spue the abbey. The abbey is not carbonic. The abbey is not sintered. The abbey bayonet the albatros. If something is unavailing and not ennobling then it spue the abbey. If something bayonet the albatros then the albatros bayonet the abbey. If something spue the albatros and it bayonet the albatros then the albatros is not unavailing. If the abbey is gobsmacked then the abbey besmirch the albatros. If the albatros bayonet the abbey then the albatros is not sintered. If something spue the abbey then the abbey is not sintered. If something spue the abbey then the abbey spue the albatros. If something bayonet the albatros and the albatros is not sintered then it does not eat the abbey. The albatros is unavailing.", "logic": "\nBesmirch(albatros, abbey)\nCarbonic(albatros)\nEnnobling(albatros)\nSpue(albatros, abbey)\nnot Carbonic(abbey)\nnot Sintered(abbey)\nBayonet(abbey, albatros)\nforall x (Unavailing(x) and not Ennobling(x) -> Spue(x, abbey))\nforall x (Bayonet(x, albatros) -> Bayonet(albatros, abbey))\nforall x (Spue(x, albatros) and Bayonet(x, albatros) -> not Unavailing(albatros))\nGobsmacked(abbey) -> Besmirch(abbey, albatros)\nBayonet(albatros, abbey) -> not Sintered(albatros)\nforall x (Spue(x, abbey) -> not Sintered(abbey))\nforall x (Spue(x, abbey) -> Spue(abbey, albatros))\nforall x (Bayonet(x, albatros) and not Sintered(albatros) -> not Besmirch(x, abbey))\n\nUnavailing(albatros)\n\nSpue(albatros, abbey) and forall x (Spue(x, abbey) -> Spue(abbey, albatros)) -> therefore Spue(abbey, albatros) Spue(abbey, albatros) and Bayonet(abbey, albatros) and forall x (Spue(x, albatros) and Bayonet(x, albatros) -> not Unavailing(albatros)) -> therefore not Unavailing(albatros)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The kynthia joint the malanie. The kynthia is editorial. The kynthia is errorless. The kynthia brisken the malanie. The malanie is not editorial. The malanie is not sportive. The malanie deplumate the kynthia. If something is passing and not errorless then it brisken the malanie. If something deplumate the kynthia then the kynthia deplumate the malanie. If something brisken the kynthia and it deplumate the kynthia then the kynthia is not passing. If the malanie is goalless then the malanie joint the kynthia. If the kynthia deplumate the malanie then the kynthia is not sportive. If something brisken the malanie then the malanie is not sportive. If something brisken the malanie then the malanie brisken the kynthia. If something deplumate the kynthia and the kynthia is not sportive then it does not eat the malanie. The malanie does not eat the malanie.", "logic": "\nJoint(kynthia, malanie)\nEditorial(kynthia)\nErrorless(kynthia)\nBrisken(kynthia, malanie)\nnot Editorial(malanie)\nnot Sportive(malanie)\nDeplumate(malanie, kynthia)\nforall x (Passing(x) and not Errorless(x) -> Brisken(x, malanie))\nforall x (Deplumate(x, kynthia) -> Deplumate(kynthia, malanie))\nforall x (Brisken(x, kynthia) and Deplumate(x, kynthia) -> not Passing(kynthia))\nGoalless(malanie) -> Joint(malanie, kynthia)\nDeplumate(kynthia, malanie) -> not Sportive(kynthia)\nforall x (Brisken(x, malanie) -> not Sportive(malanie))\nforall x (Brisken(x, malanie) -> Brisken(malanie, kynthia))\nforall x (Deplumate(x, kynthia) and not Sportive(kynthia) -> not Joint(x, malanie))\n\nnot Joint(malanie, malanie)\n\nDeplumate(malanie, kynthia) and forall x (Deplumate(x, kynthia) -> Deplumate(kynthia, malanie)) -> therefore Deplumate(kynthia, malanie) Deplumate(kynthia, malanie) and Deplumate(kynthia, malanie) -> not Sportive(kynthia) -> therefore not Sportive(kynthia) Deplumate(malanie, kynthia) and not Sportive(kynthia) and forall x (Deplumate(x, kynthia) and not Sportive(kynthia) -> not Joint(x, malanie)) -> therefore not Joint(malanie, malanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The alfredo smirch the katharina. The alfredo is monthly. The alfredo is debonnaire. The alfredo veer the katharina. The katharina is not monthly. The katharina is not collected. The katharina misgovern the alfredo. If something is perinasal and not debonnaire then it veer the katharina. If something misgovern the alfredo then the alfredo misgovern the katharina. If something veer the alfredo and it misgovern the alfredo then the alfredo is not perinasal. If the katharina is romany then the katharina smirch the alfredo. If the alfredo misgovern the katharina then the alfredo is not collected. If something veer the katharina then the katharina is not collected. If something veer the katharina then the katharina veer the alfredo. If something misgovern the alfredo and the alfredo is not collected then it does not eat the katharina. The katharina smirch the katharina.", "logic": "\nSmirch(alfredo, katharina)\nMonthly(alfredo)\nDebonnaire(alfredo)\nVeer(alfredo, katharina)\nnot Monthly(katharina)\nnot Collected(katharina)\nMisgovern(katharina, alfredo)\nforall x (Perinasal(x) and not Debonnaire(x) -> Veer(x, katharina))\nforall x (Misgovern(x, alfredo) -> Misgovern(alfredo, katharina))\nforall x (Veer(x, alfredo) and Misgovern(x, alfredo) -> not Perinasal(alfredo))\nRomany(katharina) -> Smirch(katharina, alfredo)\nMisgovern(alfredo, katharina) -> not Collected(alfredo)\nforall x (Veer(x, katharina) -> not Collected(katharina))\nforall x (Veer(x, katharina) -> Veer(katharina, alfredo))\nforall x (Misgovern(x, alfredo) and not Collected(alfredo) -> not Smirch(x, katharina))\n\nSmirch(katharina, katharina)\n\nMisgovern(katharina, alfredo) and forall x (Misgovern(x, alfredo) -> Misgovern(alfredo, katharina)) -> therefore Misgovern(alfredo, katharina) Misgovern(alfredo, katharina) and Misgovern(alfredo, katharina) -> not Collected(alfredo) -> therefore not Collected(alfredo) Misgovern(katharina, alfredo) and not Collected(alfredo) and forall x (Misgovern(x, alfredo) and not Collected(alfredo) -> not Smirch(x, katharina)) -> therefore not Smirch(katharina, katharina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The jeanette aromatise the easter. The jeanette is nonplussed. The jeanette is swayback. The jeanette inflict the easter. The easter is not nonplussed. The easter is not fussy. The easter outlast the jeanette. If something is goalless and not swayback then it inflict the easter. If something outlast the jeanette then the jeanette outlast the easter. If something inflict the jeanette and it outlast the jeanette then the jeanette is not goalless. If the easter is mesodermal then the easter aromatise the jeanette. If the jeanette outlast the easter then the jeanette is not fussy. If something inflict the easter then the easter is not fussy. If something inflict the easter then the easter inflict the jeanette. If something outlast the jeanette and the jeanette is not fussy then it does not eat the easter. The easter does not see the easter.", "logic": "\nAromatise(jeanette, easter)\nNonplussed(jeanette)\nSwayback(jeanette)\nInflict(jeanette, easter)\nnot Nonplussed(easter)\nnot Fussy(easter)\nOutlast(easter, jeanette)\nforall x (Goalless(x) and not Swayback(x) -> Inflict(x, easter))\nforall x (Outlast(x, jeanette) -> Outlast(jeanette, easter))\nforall x (Inflict(x, jeanette) and Outlast(x, jeanette) -> not Goalless(jeanette))\nMesodermal(easter) -> Aromatise(easter, jeanette)\nOutlast(jeanette, easter) -> not Fussy(jeanette)\nforall x (Inflict(x, easter) -> not Fussy(easter))\nforall x (Inflict(x, easter) -> Inflict(easter, jeanette))\nforall x (Outlast(x, jeanette) and not Fussy(jeanette) -> not Aromatise(x, easter))\n\nnot Inflict(easter, easter)\n\nforall x (Goalless(x) and not Swayback(x) -> Inflict(x, easter)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The selena drum the odelle. The selena is pearly. The selena is cormous. The selena polymerise the odelle. The odelle is not pearly. The odelle is not crowing. The odelle vaccinate the selena. If something is xxxiv and not cormous then it polymerise the odelle. If something vaccinate the selena then the selena vaccinate the odelle. If something polymerise the selena and it vaccinate the selena then the selena is not xxxiv. If the odelle is measured then the odelle drum the selena. If the selena vaccinate the odelle then the selena is not crowing. If something polymerise the odelle then the odelle is not crowing. If something polymerise the odelle then the odelle polymerise the selena. If something vaccinate the selena and the selena is not crowing then it does not eat the odelle. The odelle drum the selena.", "logic": "\nDrum(selena, odelle)\nPearly(selena)\nCormous(selena)\nPolymerise(selena, odelle)\nnot Pearly(odelle)\nnot Crowing(odelle)\nVaccinate(odelle, selena)\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and not Cormous(x) -> Polymerise(x, odelle))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, selena) -> Vaccinate(selena, odelle))\nforall x (Polymerise(x, selena) and Vaccinate(x, selena) -> not Xxxiv(selena))\nMeasured(odelle) -> Drum(odelle, selena)\nVaccinate(selena, odelle) -> not Crowing(selena)\nforall x (Polymerise(x, odelle) -> not Crowing(odelle))\nforall x (Polymerise(x, odelle) -> Polymerise(odelle, selena))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, selena) and not Crowing(selena) -> not Drum(x, odelle))\n\nDrum(odelle, selena)\n\nMeasured(odelle) -> Drum(odelle, selena) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The fran vest the marie. The fran is renunciant. The fran is nonmetal. The fran thatch the marie. The marie is not renunciant. The marie is not cross. The marie educe the fran. If something is unimodal and not nonmetal then it thatch the marie. If something educe the fran then the fran educe the marie. If something thatch the fran and it educe the fran then the fran is not unimodal. If the marie is defective then the marie vest the fran. If the fran educe the marie then the fran is not cross. If something thatch the marie then the marie is not cross. If something thatch the marie then the marie thatch the fran. If something educe the fran and the fran is not cross then it does not eat the marie. The marie does not visit the marie.", "logic": "\nVest(fran, marie)\nRenunciant(fran)\nNonmetal(fran)\nThatch(fran, marie)\nnot Renunciant(marie)\nnot Cross(marie)\nEduce(marie, fran)\nforall x (Unimodal(x) and not Nonmetal(x) -> Thatch(x, marie))\nforall x (Educe(x, fran) -> Educe(fran, marie))\nforall x (Thatch(x, fran) and Educe(x, fran) -> not Unimodal(fran))\nDefective(marie) -> Vest(marie, fran)\nEduce(fran, marie) -> not Cross(fran)\nforall x (Thatch(x, marie) -> not Cross(marie))\nforall x (Thatch(x, marie) -> Thatch(marie, fran))\nforall x (Educe(x, fran) and not Cross(fran) -> not Vest(x, marie))\n\nnot Educe(marie, marie)\n\nnot Educe(marie, marie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The ulrica carp the maggee. The ulrica is degraded. The ulrica is cambial. The ulrica energize the maggee. The maggee is not degraded. The maggee is not caddish. The maggee strut the ulrica. If something is chuffed and not cambial then it energize the maggee. If something strut the ulrica then the ulrica strut the maggee. If something energize the ulrica and it strut the ulrica then the ulrica is not chuffed. If the maggee is abactinal then the maggee carp the ulrica. If the ulrica strut the maggee then the ulrica is not caddish. If something energize the maggee then the maggee is not caddish. If something energize the maggee then the maggee energize the ulrica. If something strut the ulrica and the ulrica is not caddish then it does not eat the maggee. The ulrica energize the ulrica.", "logic": "\nCarp(ulrica, maggee)\nDegraded(ulrica)\nCambial(ulrica)\nEnergize(ulrica, maggee)\nnot Degraded(maggee)\nnot Caddish(maggee)\nStrut(maggee, ulrica)\nforall x (Chuffed(x) and not Cambial(x) -> Energize(x, maggee))\nforall x (Strut(x, ulrica) -> Strut(ulrica, maggee))\nforall x (Energize(x, ulrica) and Strut(x, ulrica) -> not Chuffed(ulrica))\nAbactinal(maggee) -> Carp(maggee, ulrica)\nStrut(ulrica, maggee) -> not Caddish(ulrica)\nforall x (Energize(x, maggee) -> not Caddish(maggee))\nforall x (Energize(x, maggee) -> Energize(maggee, ulrica))\nforall x (Strut(x, ulrica) and not Caddish(ulrica) -> not Carp(x, maggee))\n\nEnergize(ulrica, ulrica)\n\nEnergize(ulrica, ulrica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The cordelia dope the albertine. The cordelia is bindable. The cordelia is slanted. The cordelia blackjack the albertine. The albertine is not bindable. The albertine is not horned. The albertine spoon the cordelia. If something is canny and not slanted then it blackjack the albertine. If something spoon the cordelia then the cordelia spoon the albertine. If something blackjack the cordelia and it spoon the cordelia then the cordelia is not canny. If the albertine is vaccinated then the albertine dope the cordelia. If the cordelia spoon the albertine then the cordelia is not horned. If something blackjack the albertine then the albertine is not horned. If something blackjack the albertine then the albertine blackjack the cordelia. If something spoon the cordelia and the cordelia is not horned then it does not eat the albertine. The cordelia is not vaccinated.", "logic": "\nDope(cordelia, albertine)\nBindable(cordelia)\nSlanted(cordelia)\nBlackjack(cordelia, albertine)\nnot Bindable(albertine)\nnot Horned(albertine)\nSpoon(albertine, cordelia)\nforall x (Canny(x) and not Slanted(x) -> Blackjack(x, albertine))\nforall x (Spoon(x, cordelia) -> Spoon(cordelia, albertine))\nforall x (Blackjack(x, cordelia) and Spoon(x, cordelia) -> not Canny(cordelia))\nVaccinated(albertine) -> Dope(albertine, cordelia)\nSpoon(cordelia, albertine) -> not Horned(cordelia)\nforall x (Blackjack(x, albertine) -> not Horned(albertine))\nforall x (Blackjack(x, albertine) -> Blackjack(albertine, cordelia))\nforall x (Spoon(x, cordelia) and not Horned(cordelia) -> not Dope(x, albertine))\n\nnot Vaccinated(cordelia)\n\nnot Vaccinated(cordelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The gabriele beget the maritsa. The gabriele is unnotched. The gabriele is spirant. The gabriele remold the maritsa. The maritsa is not unnotched. The maritsa is not forbidding. The maritsa steal the gabriele. If something is concave and not spirant then it remold the maritsa. If something steal the gabriele then the gabriele steal the maritsa. If something remold the gabriele and it steal the gabriele then the gabriele is not concave. If the maritsa is exportable then the maritsa beget the gabriele. If the gabriele steal the maritsa then the gabriele is not forbidding. If something remold the maritsa then the maritsa is not forbidding. If something remold the maritsa then the maritsa remold the gabriele. If something steal the gabriele and the gabriele is not forbidding then it does not eat the maritsa. The gabriele beget the gabriele.", "logic": "\nBeget(gabriele, maritsa)\nUnnotched(gabriele)\nSpirant(gabriele)\nRemold(gabriele, maritsa)\nnot Unnotched(maritsa)\nnot Forbidding(maritsa)\nSteal(maritsa, gabriele)\nforall x (Concave(x) and not Spirant(x) -> Remold(x, maritsa))\nforall x (Steal(x, gabriele) -> Steal(gabriele, maritsa))\nforall x (Remold(x, gabriele) and Steal(x, gabriele) -> not Concave(gabriele))\nExportable(maritsa) -> Beget(maritsa, gabriele)\nSteal(gabriele, maritsa) -> not Forbidding(gabriele)\nforall x (Remold(x, maritsa) -> not Forbidding(maritsa))\nforall x (Remold(x, maritsa) -> Remold(maritsa, gabriele))\nforall x (Steal(x, gabriele) and not Forbidding(gabriele) -> not Beget(x, maritsa))\n\nBeget(gabriele, gabriele)\n\nBeget(gabriele, gabriele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The yule tremor the reinhard. The yule is parisian. The yule is yellowed. The yule patronize the reinhard. The reinhard is not parisian. The reinhard is not multiplied. The reinhard fossilise the yule. If something is rabbinic and not yellowed then it patronize the reinhard. If something fossilise the yule then the yule fossilise the reinhard. If something patronize the yule and it fossilise the yule then the yule is not rabbinic. If the reinhard is dextrorse then the reinhard tremor the yule. If the yule fossilise the reinhard then the yule is not multiplied. If something patronize the reinhard then the reinhard is not multiplied. If something patronize the reinhard then the reinhard patronize the yule. If something fossilise the yule and the yule is not multiplied then it does not eat the reinhard. The reinhard is not yellowed.", "logic": "\nTremor(yule, reinhard)\nParisian(yule)\nYellowed(yule)\nPatronize(yule, reinhard)\nnot Parisian(reinhard)\nnot Multiplied(reinhard)\nFossilise(reinhard, yule)\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) and not Yellowed(x) -> Patronize(x, reinhard))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, yule) -> Fossilise(yule, reinhard))\nforall x (Patronize(x, yule) and Fossilise(x, yule) -> not Rabbinic(yule))\nDextrorse(reinhard) -> Tremor(reinhard, yule)\nFossilise(yule, reinhard) -> not Multiplied(yule)\nforall x (Patronize(x, reinhard) -> not Multiplied(reinhard))\nforall x (Patronize(x, reinhard) -> Patronize(reinhard, yule))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, yule) and not Multiplied(yule) -> not Tremor(x, reinhard))\n\nnot Yellowed(reinhard)\n\nnot Yellowed(reinhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "The dinnie fraternize the caryn. The dinnie is ibsenian. The dinnie is kindred. The dinnie lavish the caryn. The caryn is not ibsenian. The caryn is not tingling. The caryn tailgate the dinnie. If something is underbred and not kindred then it lavish the caryn. If something tailgate the dinnie then the dinnie tailgate the caryn. If something lavish the dinnie and it tailgate the dinnie then the dinnie is not underbred. If the caryn is bleached then the caryn fraternize the dinnie. If the dinnie tailgate the caryn then the dinnie is not tingling. If something lavish the caryn then the caryn is not tingling. If something lavish the caryn then the caryn lavish the dinnie. If something tailgate the dinnie and the dinnie is not tingling then it does not eat the caryn. The dinnie tailgate the dinnie.", "logic": "\nFraternize(dinnie, caryn)\nIbsenian(dinnie)\nKindred(dinnie)\nLavish(dinnie, caryn)\nnot Ibsenian(caryn)\nnot Tingling(caryn)\nTailgate(caryn, dinnie)\nforall x (Underbred(x) and not Kindred(x) -> Lavish(x, caryn))\nforall x (Tailgate(x, dinnie) -> Tailgate(dinnie, caryn))\nforall x (Lavish(x, dinnie) and Tailgate(x, dinnie) -> not Underbred(dinnie))\nBleached(caryn) -> Fraternize(caryn, dinnie)\nTailgate(dinnie, caryn) -> not Tingling(dinnie)\nforall x (Lavish(x, caryn) -> not Tingling(caryn))\nforall x (Lavish(x, caryn) -> Lavish(caryn, dinnie))\nforall x (Tailgate(x, dinnie) and not Tingling(dinnie) -> not Fraternize(x, caryn))\n\nTailgate(dinnie, dinnie)\n\nTailgate(dinnie, dinnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1318"} {"premises": "Koren is overeager. Koren is unfeeling. Rolland is bipartizan. Rolland is unfeeling. Grayce is overeager. Grayce is streaked. Mamie is encrusted. Smart things are inartistic. If something is teenaged and streaked then it is inartistic. Round things are inartistic. Rough things are inartistic. If something is bipartizan then it is inartistic. Blue, bipartizan things are encrusted. Grayce is streaked.", "logic": "\nOvereager(koren)\nUnfeeling(koren)\nBipartizan(rolland)\nUnfeeling(rolland)\nOvereager(grayce)\nStreaked(grayce)\nEncrusted(mamie)\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) and Streaked(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Overeager(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) and Bipartizan(x) -> Encrusted(x))\n\nStreaked(grayce)\n\ntherefore Streaked(grayce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "Brenna is crisp. Brenna is shuddering. Gerrard is scrawny. Gerrard is shuddering. Ewan is crisp. Ewan is pathetic. Hudson is slithery. Smart things are snuff. If something is babelike and pathetic then it is snuff. Round things are snuff. Rough things are snuff. If something is scrawny then it is snuff. Blue, scrawny things are slithery. Brenna is not shuddering.", "logic": "\nCrisp(brenna)\nShuddering(brenna)\nScrawny(gerrard)\nShuddering(gerrard)\nCrisp(ewan)\nPathetic(ewan)\nSlithery(hudson)\nforall x (Slithery(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Babelike(x) and Pathetic(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Scrawny(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Crisp(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Scrawny(x) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Babelike(x) and Scrawny(x) -> Slithery(x))\n\nnot Shuddering(brenna)\n\ntherefore Shuddering(brenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "Ola is unsexed. Ola is famous. Randa is exiguous. Randa is famous. Elyssa is unsexed. Elyssa is grilled. Debora is helical. Smart things are calycine. If something is committed and grilled then it is calycine. Round things are calycine. Rough things are calycine. If something is exiguous then it is calycine. Blue, exiguous things are helical. Debora is calycine.", "logic": "\nUnsexed(ola)\nFamous(ola)\nExiguous(randa)\nFamous(randa)\nUnsexed(elyssa)\nGrilled(elyssa)\nHelical(debora)\nforall x (Helical(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Committed(x) and Grilled(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Unsexed(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Exiguous(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Committed(x) and Exiguous(x) -> Helical(x))\n\nCalycine(debora)\n\nHelical(debora) and forall x (Helical(x) -> Calycine(x)) -> therefore Calycine(debora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "Winny is pulseless. Winny is illogical. Anton is burnished. Anton is illogical. Andre is pulseless. Andre is motorized. Aleece is beastly. Smart things are credal. If something is unmilitary and motorized then it is credal. Round things are credal. Rough things are credal. If something is burnished then it is credal. Blue, burnished things are beastly. Aleece is not credal.", "logic": "\nPulseless(winny)\nIllogical(winny)\nBurnished(anton)\nIllogical(anton)\nPulseless(andre)\nMotorized(andre)\nBeastly(aleece)\nforall x (Beastly(x) -> Credal(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Motorized(x) -> Credal(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) -> Credal(x))\nforall x (Pulseless(x) -> Credal(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) -> Credal(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Burnished(x) -> Beastly(x))\n\nnot Credal(aleece)\n\nBeastly(aleece) and forall x (Beastly(x) -> Credal(x)) -> therefore Credal(aleece)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "Uta is marine. Uta is limbic. Melonie is semisoft. Melonie is limbic. Fleur is marine. Fleur is inactive. Beret is straw. Smart things are unnotched. If something is spurting and inactive then it is unnotched. Round things are unnotched. Rough things are unnotched. If something is semisoft then it is unnotched. Blue, semisoft things are straw. Uta is not straw.", "logic": "\nMarine(uta)\nLimbic(uta)\nSemisoft(melonie)\nLimbic(melonie)\nMarine(fleur)\nInactive(fleur)\nStraw(beret)\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) and Inactive(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Marine(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Semisoft(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) and Semisoft(x) -> Straw(x))\n\nnot Straw(uta)\n\nforall x (Spurting(x) and Semisoft(x) -> Straw(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "Jennine is homespun. Jennine is factitious. Ofilia is noxious. Ofilia is factitious. Dotty is homespun. Dotty is daily. Gaven is utilizable. Smart things are beloved. If something is infernal and daily then it is beloved. Round things are beloved. Rough things are beloved. If something is noxious then it is beloved. Blue, noxious things are utilizable. Ofilia is utilizable.", "logic": "\nHomespun(jennine)\nFactitious(jennine)\nNoxious(ofilia)\nFactitious(ofilia)\nHomespun(dotty)\nDaily(dotty)\nUtilizable(gaven)\nforall x (Utilizable(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Infernal(x) and Daily(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Homespun(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Noxious(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Infernal(x) and Noxious(x) -> Utilizable(x))\n\nUtilizable(ofilia)\n\nforall x (Infernal(x) and Noxious(x) -> Utilizable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "Salvador is snobby. Salvador is fain. Arlana is monogenic. Arlana is fain. Mufinella is snobby. Mufinella is medium. Spiro is undimmed. Smart things are unswerving. If something is huxleian and medium then it is unswerving. Round things are unswerving. Rough things are unswerving. If something is monogenic then it is unswerving. Blue, monogenic things are undimmed. Spiro is not monogenic.", "logic": "\nSnobby(salvador)\nFain(salvador)\nMonogenic(arlana)\nFain(arlana)\nSnobby(mufinella)\nMedium(mufinella)\nUndimmed(spiro)\nforall x (Undimmed(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) and Medium(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Snobby(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Undimmed(x))\n\nnot Monogenic(spiro)\n\nnot Monogenic(spiro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "Patricia is prickly. Patricia is trifoliate. Izzi is moldable. Izzi is trifoliate. Guinna is prickly. Guinna is bilious. Sterling is stodgy. Smart things are chaotic. If something is uttermost and bilious then it is chaotic. Round things are chaotic. Rough things are chaotic. If something is moldable then it is chaotic. Blue, moldable things are stodgy. Guinna is trifoliate.", "logic": "\nPrickly(patricia)\nTrifoliate(patricia)\nMoldable(izzi)\nTrifoliate(izzi)\nPrickly(guinna)\nBilious(guinna)\nStodgy(sterling)\nforall x (Stodgy(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) and Bilious(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Moldable(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Prickly(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Moldable(x) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) and Moldable(x) -> Stodgy(x))\n\nTrifoliate(guinna)\n\nTrifoliate(guinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2522"} {"premises": "The kimmo balance the staffard. The darrick balance the kimmo. The jessika accord the kimmo. The staffard balance the kimmo. If someone symphonise the staffard and the staffard balance the kimmo then the staffard symphonise the jessika. If someone symphonise the jessika then the jessika accord the staffard. If someone accord the staffard and the staffard accord the jessika then the staffard balance the jessika. If someone accord the kimmo then they like the staffard. If someone balance the darrick then they like the staffard. If someone balance the staffard then they eat the jessika. If someone balance the jessika and the jessika does not like the darrick then the darrick balance the kimmo. All inorganic people are not aerolitic. The staffard balance the kimmo.", "logic": "\nBalance(kimmo, staffard)\nBalance(darrick, kimmo)\nAccord(jessika, kimmo)\nBalance(staffard, kimmo)\nforall x (Symphonise(x, staffard) and Balance(staffard, kimmo) -> Symphonise(staffard, jessika))\nforall x (Symphonise(x, jessika) -> Accord(jessika, staffard))\nforall x (Accord(x, staffard) and Accord(staffard, jessika) -> Balance(staffard, jessika))\nforall x (Accord(x, kimmo) -> Symphonise(x, staffard))\nforall x (Balance(x, darrick) -> Symphonise(x, staffard))\nforall x (Balance(x, staffard) -> Accord(x, jessika))\nforall x (Balance(x, jessika) and not Symphonise(jessika, darrick) -> Balance(darrick, kimmo))\nforall x (Inorganic(x) -> not Aerolitic(x))\n\nBalance(staffard, kimmo)\n\ntherefore Balance(staffard, kimmo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The kaycee aberrate the pierce. The clovis aberrate the kaycee. The ardene colorize the kaycee. The pierce aberrate the kaycee. If someone sour the pierce and the pierce aberrate the kaycee then the pierce sour the ardene. If someone sour the ardene then the ardene colorize the pierce. If someone colorize the pierce and the pierce colorize the ardene then the pierce aberrate the ardene. If someone colorize the kaycee then they like the pierce. If someone aberrate the clovis then they like the pierce. If someone aberrate the pierce then they eat the ardene. If someone aberrate the ardene and the ardene does not like the clovis then the clovis aberrate the kaycee. All manorial people are not felicitous. The ardene does not eat the kaycee.", "logic": "\nAberrate(kaycee, pierce)\nAberrate(clovis, kaycee)\nColorize(ardene, kaycee)\nAberrate(pierce, kaycee)\nforall x (Sour(x, pierce) and Aberrate(pierce, kaycee) -> Sour(pierce, ardene))\nforall x (Sour(x, ardene) -> Colorize(ardene, pierce))\nforall x (Colorize(x, pierce) and Colorize(pierce, ardene) -> Aberrate(pierce, ardene))\nforall x (Colorize(x, kaycee) -> Sour(x, pierce))\nforall x (Aberrate(x, clovis) -> Sour(x, pierce))\nforall x (Aberrate(x, pierce) -> Colorize(x, ardene))\nforall x (Aberrate(x, ardene) and not Sour(ardene, clovis) -> Aberrate(clovis, kaycee))\nforall x (Manorial(x) -> not Felicitous(x))\n\nnot Colorize(ardene, kaycee)\n\ntherefore Colorize(ardene, kaycee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The tara repine the avie. The ulises repine the tara. The yevette sashay the tara. The avie repine the tara. If someone twill the avie and the avie repine the tara then the avie twill the yevette. If someone twill the yevette then the yevette sashay the avie. If someone sashay the avie and the avie sashay the yevette then the avie repine the yevette. If someone sashay the tara then they like the avie. If someone repine the ulises then they like the avie. If someone repine the avie then they eat the yevette. If someone repine the yevette and the yevette does not like the ulises then the ulises repine the tara. All oozing people are not durable. The tara sashay the yevette.", "logic": "\nRepine(tara, avie)\nRepine(ulises, tara)\nSashay(yevette, tara)\nRepine(avie, tara)\nforall x (Twill(x, avie) and Repine(avie, tara) -> Twill(avie, yevette))\nforall x (Twill(x, yevette) -> Sashay(yevette, avie))\nforall x (Sashay(x, avie) and Sashay(avie, yevette) -> Repine(avie, yevette))\nforall x (Sashay(x, tara) -> Twill(x, avie))\nforall x (Repine(x, ulises) -> Twill(x, avie))\nforall x (Repine(x, avie) -> Sashay(x, yevette))\nforall x (Repine(x, yevette) and not Twill(yevette, ulises) -> Repine(ulises, tara))\nforall x (Oozing(x) -> not Durable(x))\n\nSashay(tara, yevette)\n\nRepine(tara, avie) and forall x (Repine(x, avie) -> Sashay(x, yevette)) -> therefore Sashay(tara, yevette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The marsh occupy the mervin. The tate occupy the marsh. The aldwin pull the marsh. The mervin occupy the marsh. If someone palisade the mervin and the mervin occupy the marsh then the mervin palisade the aldwin. If someone palisade the aldwin then the aldwin pull the mervin. If someone pull the mervin and the mervin pull the aldwin then the mervin occupy the aldwin. If someone pull the marsh then they like the mervin. If someone occupy the tate then they like the mervin. If someone occupy the mervin then they eat the aldwin. If someone occupy the aldwin and the aldwin does not like the tate then the tate occupy the marsh. All square people are not recovering. The marsh does not eat the aldwin.", "logic": "\nOccupy(marsh, mervin)\nOccupy(tate, marsh)\nPull(aldwin, marsh)\nOccupy(mervin, marsh)\nforall x (Palisade(x, mervin) and Occupy(mervin, marsh) -> Palisade(mervin, aldwin))\nforall x (Palisade(x, aldwin) -> Pull(aldwin, mervin))\nforall x (Pull(x, mervin) and Pull(mervin, aldwin) -> Occupy(mervin, aldwin))\nforall x (Pull(x, marsh) -> Palisade(x, mervin))\nforall x (Occupy(x, tate) -> Palisade(x, mervin))\nforall x (Occupy(x, mervin) -> Pull(x, aldwin))\nforall x (Occupy(x, aldwin) and not Palisade(aldwin, tate) -> Occupy(tate, marsh))\nforall x (Square(x) -> not Recovering(x))\n\nnot Pull(marsh, aldwin)\n\nOccupy(marsh, mervin) and forall x (Occupy(x, mervin) -> Pull(x, aldwin)) -> therefore Pull(marsh, aldwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The erny expatriate the lynnette. The starlin expatriate the erny. The alyson background the erny. The lynnette expatriate the erny. If someone misadvise the lynnette and the lynnette expatriate the erny then the lynnette misadvise the alyson. If someone misadvise the alyson then the alyson background the lynnette. If someone background the lynnette and the lynnette background the alyson then the lynnette expatriate the alyson. If someone background the erny then they like the lynnette. If someone expatriate the starlin then they like the lynnette. If someone expatriate the lynnette then they eat the alyson. If someone expatriate the alyson and the alyson does not like the starlin then the starlin expatriate the erny. All loose people are not continual. The lynnette misadvise the alyson.", "logic": "\nExpatriate(erny, lynnette)\nExpatriate(starlin, erny)\nBackground(alyson, erny)\nExpatriate(lynnette, erny)\nforall x (Misadvise(x, lynnette) and Expatriate(lynnette, erny) -> Misadvise(lynnette, alyson))\nforall x (Misadvise(x, alyson) -> Background(alyson, lynnette))\nforall x (Background(x, lynnette) and Background(lynnette, alyson) -> Expatriate(lynnette, alyson))\nforall x (Background(x, erny) -> Misadvise(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, starlin) -> Misadvise(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, lynnette) -> Background(x, alyson))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, alyson) and not Misadvise(alyson, starlin) -> Expatriate(starlin, erny))\nforall x (Loose(x) -> not Continual(x))\n\nMisadvise(lynnette, alyson)\n\nBackground(alyson, erny) and forall x (Background(x, erny) -> Misadvise(x, lynnette)) -> therefore Misadvise(alyson, lynnette) Misadvise(alyson, lynnette) and Expatriate(lynnette, erny) and forall x (Misadvise(x, lynnette) and Expatriate(lynnette, erny) -> Misadvise(lynnette, alyson)) -> therefore Misadvise(lynnette, alyson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The eudora sorb the sophey. The correna sorb the eudora. The eddi forearm the eudora. The sophey sorb the eudora. If someone supersede the sophey and the sophey sorb the eudora then the sophey supersede the eddi. If someone supersede the eddi then the eddi forearm the sophey. If someone forearm the sophey and the sophey forearm the eddi then the sophey sorb the eddi. If someone forearm the eudora then they like the sophey. If someone sorb the correna then they like the sophey. If someone sorb the sophey then they eat the eddi. If someone sorb the eddi and the eddi does not like the correna then the correna sorb the eudora. All tiled people are not trihydroxy. The sophey does not like the eddi.", "logic": "\nSorb(eudora, sophey)\nSorb(correna, eudora)\nForearm(eddi, eudora)\nSorb(sophey, eudora)\nforall x (Supersede(x, sophey) and Sorb(sophey, eudora) -> Supersede(sophey, eddi))\nforall x (Supersede(x, eddi) -> Forearm(eddi, sophey))\nforall x (Forearm(x, sophey) and Forearm(sophey, eddi) -> Sorb(sophey, eddi))\nforall x (Forearm(x, eudora) -> Supersede(x, sophey))\nforall x (Sorb(x, correna) -> Supersede(x, sophey))\nforall x (Sorb(x, sophey) -> Forearm(x, eddi))\nforall x (Sorb(x, eddi) and not Supersede(eddi, correna) -> Sorb(correna, eudora))\nforall x (Tiled(x) -> not Trihydroxy(x))\n\nnot Supersede(sophey, eddi)\n\nForearm(eddi, eudora) and forall x (Forearm(x, eudora) -> Supersede(x, sophey)) -> therefore Supersede(eddi, sophey) Supersede(eddi, sophey) and Sorb(sophey, eudora) and forall x (Supersede(x, sophey) and Sorb(sophey, eudora) -> Supersede(sophey, eddi)) -> therefore Supersede(sophey, eddi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The annamaria oxidise the sandro. The bryana oxidise the annamaria. The hesther flake the annamaria. The sandro oxidise the annamaria. If someone tattoo the sandro and the sandro oxidise the annamaria then the sandro tattoo the hesther. If someone tattoo the hesther then the hesther flake the sandro. If someone flake the sandro and the sandro flake the hesther then the sandro oxidise the hesther. If someone flake the annamaria then they like the sandro. If someone oxidise the bryana then they like the sandro. If someone oxidise the sandro then they eat the hesther. If someone oxidise the hesther and the hesther does not like the bryana then the bryana oxidise the annamaria. All spondaic people are not unprompted. The hesther flake the sandro.", "logic": "\nOxidise(annamaria, sandro)\nOxidise(bryana, annamaria)\nFlake(hesther, annamaria)\nOxidise(sandro, annamaria)\nforall x (Tattoo(x, sandro) and Oxidise(sandro, annamaria) -> Tattoo(sandro, hesther))\nforall x (Tattoo(x, hesther) -> Flake(hesther, sandro))\nforall x (Flake(x, sandro) and Flake(sandro, hesther) -> Oxidise(sandro, hesther))\nforall x (Flake(x, annamaria) -> Tattoo(x, sandro))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, bryana) -> Tattoo(x, sandro))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, sandro) -> Flake(x, hesther))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, hesther) and not Tattoo(hesther, bryana) -> Oxidise(bryana, annamaria))\nforall x (Spondaic(x) -> not Unprompted(x))\n\nFlake(hesther, sandro)\n\nFlake(hesther, annamaria) and forall x (Flake(x, annamaria) -> Tattoo(x, sandro)) -> therefore Tattoo(hesther, sandro) Tattoo(hesther, sandro) and Oxidise(sandro, annamaria) and forall x (Tattoo(x, sandro) and Oxidise(sandro, annamaria) -> Tattoo(sandro, hesther)) -> therefore Tattoo(sandro, hesther) Tattoo(sandro, hesther) and forall x (Tattoo(x, hesther) -> Flake(hesther, sandro)) -> therefore Flake(hesther, sandro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The vincent dulcify the tilly. The bevvy dulcify the vincent. The erma rollick the vincent. The tilly dulcify the vincent. If someone arbitrage the tilly and the tilly dulcify the vincent then the tilly arbitrage the erma. If someone arbitrage the erma then the erma rollick the tilly. If someone rollick the tilly and the tilly rollick the erma then the tilly dulcify the erma. If someone rollick the vincent then they like the tilly. If someone dulcify the bevvy then they like the tilly. If someone dulcify the tilly then they eat the erma. If someone dulcify the erma and the erma does not like the bevvy then the bevvy dulcify the vincent. All overhand people are not crisp. The erma does not eat the tilly.", "logic": "\nDulcify(vincent, tilly)\nDulcify(bevvy, vincent)\nRollick(erma, vincent)\nDulcify(tilly, vincent)\nforall x (Arbitrage(x, tilly) and Dulcify(tilly, vincent) -> Arbitrage(tilly, erma))\nforall x (Arbitrage(x, erma) -> Rollick(erma, tilly))\nforall x (Rollick(x, tilly) and Rollick(tilly, erma) -> Dulcify(tilly, erma))\nforall x (Rollick(x, vincent) -> Arbitrage(x, tilly))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, bevvy) -> Arbitrage(x, tilly))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, tilly) -> Rollick(x, erma))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, erma) and not Arbitrage(erma, bevvy) -> Dulcify(bevvy, vincent))\nforall x (Overhand(x) -> not Crisp(x))\n\nnot Rollick(erma, tilly)\n\nRollick(erma, vincent) and forall x (Rollick(x, vincent) -> Arbitrage(x, tilly)) -> therefore Arbitrage(erma, tilly) Arbitrage(erma, tilly) and Dulcify(tilly, vincent) and forall x (Arbitrage(x, tilly) and Dulcify(tilly, vincent) -> Arbitrage(tilly, erma)) -> therefore Arbitrage(tilly, erma) Arbitrage(tilly, erma) and forall x (Arbitrage(x, erma) -> Rollick(erma, tilly)) -> therefore Rollick(erma, tilly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The philly slop the marquita. The yovonnda slop the philly. The billi fort the philly. The marquita slop the philly. If someone regiment the marquita and the marquita slop the philly then the marquita regiment the billi. If someone regiment the billi then the billi fort the marquita. If someone fort the marquita and the marquita fort the billi then the marquita slop the billi. If someone fort the philly then they like the marquita. If someone slop the yovonnda then they like the marquita. If someone slop the marquita then they eat the billi. If someone slop the billi and the billi does not like the yovonnda then the yovonnda slop the philly. All punctual people are not ibsenian. The philly does not like the marquita.", "logic": "\nSlop(philly, marquita)\nSlop(yovonnda, philly)\nFort(billi, philly)\nSlop(marquita, philly)\nforall x (Regiment(x, marquita) and Slop(marquita, philly) -> Regiment(marquita, billi))\nforall x (Regiment(x, billi) -> Fort(billi, marquita))\nforall x (Fort(x, marquita) and Fort(marquita, billi) -> Slop(marquita, billi))\nforall x (Fort(x, philly) -> Regiment(x, marquita))\nforall x (Slop(x, yovonnda) -> Regiment(x, marquita))\nforall x (Slop(x, marquita) -> Fort(x, billi))\nforall x (Slop(x, billi) and not Regiment(billi, yovonnda) -> Slop(yovonnda, philly))\nforall x (Punctual(x) -> not Ibsenian(x))\n\nnot Regiment(philly, marquita)\n\nforall x (Fort(x, philly) -> Regiment(x, marquita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The shay take the pattie. The elmer take the shay. The eveleen extenuate the shay. The pattie take the shay. If someone misbelieve the pattie and the pattie take the shay then the pattie misbelieve the eveleen. If someone misbelieve the eveleen then the eveleen extenuate the pattie. If someone extenuate the pattie and the pattie extenuate the eveleen then the pattie take the eveleen. If someone extenuate the shay then they like the pattie. If someone take the elmer then they like the pattie. If someone take the pattie then they eat the eveleen. If someone take the eveleen and the eveleen does not like the elmer then the elmer take the shay. All foxy people are not prim. The pattie take the eveleen.", "logic": "\nTake(shay, pattie)\nTake(elmer, shay)\nExtenuate(eveleen, shay)\nTake(pattie, shay)\nforall x (Misbelieve(x, pattie) and Take(pattie, shay) -> Misbelieve(pattie, eveleen))\nforall x (Misbelieve(x, eveleen) -> Extenuate(eveleen, pattie))\nforall x (Extenuate(x, pattie) and Extenuate(pattie, eveleen) -> Take(pattie, eveleen))\nforall x (Extenuate(x, shay) -> Misbelieve(x, pattie))\nforall x (Take(x, elmer) -> Misbelieve(x, pattie))\nforall x (Take(x, pattie) -> Extenuate(x, eveleen))\nforall x (Take(x, eveleen) and not Misbelieve(eveleen, elmer) -> Take(elmer, shay))\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> not Prim(x))\n\nTake(pattie, eveleen)\n\nforall x (Extenuate(x, pattie) and Extenuate(pattie, eveleen) -> Take(pattie, eveleen)) <- forall x (Take(x, pattie) -> Extenuate(x, eveleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The finn draught the corabella. The sid draught the finn. The austine sheathe the finn. The corabella draught the finn. If someone twist the corabella and the corabella draught the finn then the corabella twist the austine. If someone twist the austine then the austine sheathe the corabella. If someone sheathe the corabella and the corabella sheathe the austine then the corabella draught the austine. If someone sheathe the finn then they like the corabella. If someone draught the sid then they like the corabella. If someone draught the corabella then they eat the austine. If someone draught the austine and the austine does not like the sid then the sid draught the finn. All doable people are not exuberant. The sid does not like the corabella.", "logic": "\nDraught(finn, corabella)\nDraught(sid, finn)\nSheathe(austine, finn)\nDraught(corabella, finn)\nforall x (Twist(x, corabella) and Draught(corabella, finn) -> Twist(corabella, austine))\nforall x (Twist(x, austine) -> Sheathe(austine, corabella))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, corabella) and Sheathe(corabella, austine) -> Draught(corabella, austine))\nforall x (Sheathe(x, finn) -> Twist(x, corabella))\nforall x (Draught(x, sid) -> Twist(x, corabella))\nforall x (Draught(x, corabella) -> Sheathe(x, austine))\nforall x (Draught(x, austine) and not Twist(austine, sid) -> Draught(sid, finn))\nforall x (Doable(x) -> not Exuberant(x))\n\nnot Twist(sid, corabella)\n\nforall x (Sheathe(x, finn) -> Twist(x, corabella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The janus communize the bambie. The lisette communize the janus. The ramesh disclose the janus. The bambie communize the janus. If someone resole the bambie and the bambie communize the janus then the bambie resole the ramesh. If someone resole the ramesh then the ramesh disclose the bambie. If someone disclose the bambie and the bambie disclose the ramesh then the bambie communize the ramesh. If someone disclose the janus then they like the bambie. If someone communize the lisette then they like the bambie. If someone communize the bambie then they eat the ramesh. If someone communize the ramesh and the ramesh does not like the lisette then the lisette communize the janus. All hesitating people are not cattish. The bambie disclose the ramesh.", "logic": "\nCommunize(janus, bambie)\nCommunize(lisette, janus)\nDisclose(ramesh, janus)\nCommunize(bambie, janus)\nforall x (Resole(x, bambie) and Communize(bambie, janus) -> Resole(bambie, ramesh))\nforall x (Resole(x, ramesh) -> Disclose(ramesh, bambie))\nforall x (Disclose(x, bambie) and Disclose(bambie, ramesh) -> Communize(bambie, ramesh))\nforall x (Disclose(x, janus) -> Resole(x, bambie))\nforall x (Communize(x, lisette) -> Resole(x, bambie))\nforall x (Communize(x, bambie) -> Disclose(x, ramesh))\nforall x (Communize(x, ramesh) and not Resole(ramesh, lisette) -> Communize(lisette, janus))\nforall x (Hesitating(x) -> not Cattish(x))\n\nDisclose(bambie, ramesh)\n\nforall x (Communize(x, bambie) -> Disclose(x, ramesh)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The andres paddle the thatcher. The violet paddle the andres. The calvin manoeuver the andres. The thatcher paddle the andres. If someone quarantine the thatcher and the thatcher paddle the andres then the thatcher quarantine the calvin. If someone quarantine the calvin then the calvin manoeuver the thatcher. If someone manoeuver the thatcher and the thatcher manoeuver the calvin then the thatcher paddle the calvin. If someone manoeuver the andres then they like the thatcher. If someone paddle the violet then they like the thatcher. If someone paddle the thatcher then they eat the calvin. If someone paddle the calvin and the calvin does not like the violet then the violet paddle the andres. All delinquent people are not glial. The andres is not cold.", "logic": "\nPaddle(andres, thatcher)\nPaddle(violet, andres)\nManoeuver(calvin, andres)\nPaddle(thatcher, andres)\nforall x (Quarantine(x, thatcher) and Paddle(thatcher, andres) -> Quarantine(thatcher, calvin))\nforall x (Quarantine(x, calvin) -> Manoeuver(calvin, thatcher))\nforall x (Manoeuver(x, thatcher) and Manoeuver(thatcher, calvin) -> Paddle(thatcher, calvin))\nforall x (Manoeuver(x, andres) -> Quarantine(x, thatcher))\nforall x (Paddle(x, violet) -> Quarantine(x, thatcher))\nforall x (Paddle(x, thatcher) -> Manoeuver(x, calvin))\nforall x (Paddle(x, calvin) and not Quarantine(calvin, violet) -> Paddle(violet, andres))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> not Glial(x))\n\nnot Cold(andres)\n\nnot Cold(andres) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The gwenny arborize the tiffi. The jonathan arborize the gwenny. The emmanuel reap the gwenny. The tiffi arborize the gwenny. If someone attack the tiffi and the tiffi arborize the gwenny then the tiffi attack the emmanuel. If someone attack the emmanuel then the emmanuel reap the tiffi. If someone reap the tiffi and the tiffi reap the emmanuel then the tiffi arborize the emmanuel. If someone reap the gwenny then they like the tiffi. If someone arborize the jonathan then they like the tiffi. If someone arborize the tiffi then they eat the emmanuel. If someone arborize the emmanuel and the emmanuel does not like the jonathan then the jonathan arborize the gwenny. All allegiant people are not postexilic. The jonathan arborize the jonathan.", "logic": "\nArborize(gwenny, tiffi)\nArborize(jonathan, gwenny)\nReap(emmanuel, gwenny)\nArborize(tiffi, gwenny)\nforall x (Attack(x, tiffi) and Arborize(tiffi, gwenny) -> Attack(tiffi, emmanuel))\nforall x (Attack(x, emmanuel) -> Reap(emmanuel, tiffi))\nforall x (Reap(x, tiffi) and Reap(tiffi, emmanuel) -> Arborize(tiffi, emmanuel))\nforall x (Reap(x, gwenny) -> Attack(x, tiffi))\nforall x (Arborize(x, jonathan) -> Attack(x, tiffi))\nforall x (Arborize(x, tiffi) -> Reap(x, emmanuel))\nforall x (Arborize(x, emmanuel) and not Attack(emmanuel, jonathan) -> Arborize(jonathan, gwenny))\nforall x (Allegiant(x) -> not Postexilic(x))\n\nArborize(jonathan, jonathan)\n\nArborize(jonathan, jonathan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The case impale the quincey. The bryna impale the case. The moselle rosin the case. The quincey impale the case. If someone cloister the quincey and the quincey impale the case then the quincey cloister the moselle. If someone cloister the moselle then the moselle rosin the quincey. If someone rosin the quincey and the quincey rosin the moselle then the quincey impale the moselle. If someone rosin the case then they like the quincey. If someone impale the bryna then they like the quincey. If someone impale the quincey then they eat the moselle. If someone impale the moselle and the moselle does not like the bryna then the bryna impale the case. All medullary people are not campanular. The quincey is not medullary.", "logic": "\nImpale(case, quincey)\nImpale(bryna, case)\nRosin(moselle, case)\nImpale(quincey, case)\nforall x (Cloister(x, quincey) and Impale(quincey, case) -> Cloister(quincey, moselle))\nforall x (Cloister(x, moselle) -> Rosin(moselle, quincey))\nforall x (Rosin(x, quincey) and Rosin(quincey, moselle) -> Impale(quincey, moselle))\nforall x (Rosin(x, case) -> Cloister(x, quincey))\nforall x (Impale(x, bryna) -> Cloister(x, quincey))\nforall x (Impale(x, quincey) -> Rosin(x, moselle))\nforall x (Impale(x, moselle) and not Cloister(moselle, bryna) -> Impale(bryna, case))\nforall x (Medullary(x) -> not Campanular(x))\n\nnot Medullary(quincey)\n\nnot Medullary(quincey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "The marji idolize the arabela. The ellynn idolize the marji. The matthaeus accustom the marji. The arabela idolize the marji. If someone sporulate the arabela and the arabela idolize the marji then the arabela sporulate the matthaeus. If someone sporulate the matthaeus then the matthaeus accustom the arabela. If someone accustom the arabela and the arabela accustom the matthaeus then the arabela idolize the matthaeus. If someone accustom the marji then they like the arabela. If someone idolize the ellynn then they like the arabela. If someone idolize the arabela then they eat the matthaeus. If someone idolize the matthaeus and the matthaeus does not like the ellynn then the ellynn idolize the marji. All dreamed people are not upcountry. The ellynn idolize the matthaeus.", "logic": "\nIdolize(marji, arabela)\nIdolize(ellynn, marji)\nAccustom(matthaeus, marji)\nIdolize(arabela, marji)\nforall x (Sporulate(x, arabela) and Idolize(arabela, marji) -> Sporulate(arabela, matthaeus))\nforall x (Sporulate(x, matthaeus) -> Accustom(matthaeus, arabela))\nforall x (Accustom(x, arabela) and Accustom(arabela, matthaeus) -> Idolize(arabela, matthaeus))\nforall x (Accustom(x, marji) -> Sporulate(x, arabela))\nforall x (Idolize(x, ellynn) -> Sporulate(x, arabela))\nforall x (Idolize(x, arabela) -> Accustom(x, matthaeus))\nforall x (Idolize(x, matthaeus) and not Sporulate(matthaeus, ellynn) -> Idolize(ellynn, marji))\nforall x (Dreamed(x) -> not Upcountry(x))\n\nIdolize(ellynn, matthaeus)\n\nIdolize(ellynn, matthaeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1622"} {"premises": "Antonino is sloping. Merrill is hieratic. All sloping things are hieratic. If Merrill is sloping then Merrill is balking. If Antonino is hieratic then Antonino is balking. If Antonino is balking and Antonino is cogitative then Antonino is cetacean. Smart, cetacean things are varied. If Antonino is hieratic then Antonino is cetacean. If Antonino is varied and Antonino is hieratic then Antonino is sloping. Rough, tracked things are balking. Merrill is hieratic.", "logic": "\nSloping(antonino)\nHieratic(merrill)\nforall x (Sloping(x) -> Hieratic(x))\nSloping(merrill) -> Balking(merrill)\nHieratic(antonino) -> Balking(antonino)\nBalking(antonino) and Cogitative(antonino) -> Cetacean(antonino)\nforall x (Sloping(x) and Cetacean(x) -> Varied(x))\nHieratic(antonino) -> Cetacean(antonino)\nVaried(antonino) and Hieratic(antonino) -> Sloping(antonino)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) and Tracked(x) -> Balking(x))\n\nHieratic(merrill)\n\ntherefore Hieratic(merrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Leola is biserrate. Susannah is ninth. All biserrate things are ninth. If Susannah is biserrate then Susannah is carefree. If Leola is ninth then Leola is carefree. If Leola is carefree and Leola is rimless then Leola is unrevealed. Smart, unrevealed things are curative. If Leola is ninth then Leola is unrevealed. If Leola is curative and Leola is ninth then Leola is biserrate. Rough, carmine things are carefree. Susannah is not ninth.", "logic": "\nBiserrate(leola)\nNinth(susannah)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> Ninth(x))\nBiserrate(susannah) -> Carefree(susannah)\nNinth(leola) -> Carefree(leola)\nCarefree(leola) and Rimless(leola) -> Unrevealed(leola)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) and Unrevealed(x) -> Curative(x))\nNinth(leola) -> Unrevealed(leola)\nCurative(leola) and Ninth(leola) -> Biserrate(leola)\nforall x (Rimless(x) and Carmine(x) -> Carefree(x))\n\nnot Ninth(susannah)\n\ntherefore Ninth(susannah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Debor is haitian. Sterne is accusatory. All haitian things are accusatory. If Sterne is haitian then Sterne is transitive. If Debor is accusatory then Debor is transitive. If Debor is transitive and Debor is botched then Debor is citywide. Smart, citywide things are sandalled. If Debor is accusatory then Debor is citywide. If Debor is sandalled and Debor is accusatory then Debor is haitian. Rough, hindi things are transitive. Debor is accusatory.", "logic": "\nHaitian(debor)\nAccusatory(sterne)\nforall x (Haitian(x) -> Accusatory(x))\nHaitian(sterne) -> Transitive(sterne)\nAccusatory(debor) -> Transitive(debor)\nTransitive(debor) and Botched(debor) -> Citywide(debor)\nforall x (Haitian(x) and Citywide(x) -> Sandalled(x))\nAccusatory(debor) -> Citywide(debor)\nSandalled(debor) and Accusatory(debor) -> Haitian(debor)\nforall x (Botched(x) and Hindi(x) -> Transitive(x))\n\nAccusatory(debor)\n\nHaitian(debor) and forall x (Haitian(x) -> Accusatory(x)) -> therefore Accusatory(debor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Alicia is painterly. Isaac is fallible. All painterly things are fallible. If Isaac is painterly then Isaac is wise. If Alicia is fallible then Alicia is wise. If Alicia is wise and Alicia is comical then Alicia is busybodied. Smart, busybodied things are phony. If Alicia is fallible then Alicia is busybodied. If Alicia is phony and Alicia is fallible then Alicia is painterly. Rough, shrubby things are wise. Alicia is not fallible.", "logic": "\nPainterly(alicia)\nFallible(isaac)\nforall x (Painterly(x) -> Fallible(x))\nPainterly(isaac) -> Wise(isaac)\nFallible(alicia) -> Wise(alicia)\nWise(alicia) and Comical(alicia) -> Busybodied(alicia)\nforall x (Painterly(x) and Busybodied(x) -> Phony(x))\nFallible(alicia) -> Busybodied(alicia)\nPhony(alicia) and Fallible(alicia) -> Painterly(alicia)\nforall x (Comical(x) and Shrubby(x) -> Wise(x))\n\nnot Fallible(alicia)\n\nPainterly(alicia) and forall x (Painterly(x) -> Fallible(x)) -> therefore Fallible(alicia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Alden is shaped. Zilvia is moderne. All shaped things are moderne. If Zilvia is shaped then Zilvia is chapfallen. If Alden is moderne then Alden is chapfallen. If Alden is chapfallen and Alden is fortemente then Alden is aery. Smart, aery things are anguillan. If Alden is moderne then Alden is aery. If Alden is anguillan and Alden is moderne then Alden is shaped. Rough, triploid things are chapfallen. Alden is chapfallen.", "logic": "\nShaped(alden)\nModerne(zilvia)\nforall x (Shaped(x) -> Moderne(x))\nShaped(zilvia) -> Chapfallen(zilvia)\nModerne(alden) -> Chapfallen(alden)\nChapfallen(alden) and Fortemente(alden) -> Aery(alden)\nforall x (Shaped(x) and Aery(x) -> Anguillan(x))\nModerne(alden) -> Aery(alden)\nAnguillan(alden) and Moderne(alden) -> Shaped(alden)\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Triploid(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\n\nChapfallen(alden)\n\nShaped(alden) and forall x (Shaped(x) -> Moderne(x)) -> therefore Moderne(alden) Moderne(alden) and Moderne(alden) -> Chapfallen(alden) -> therefore Chapfallen(alden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Zea is molar. Pascal is tegular. All molar things are tegular. If Pascal is molar then Pascal is unsalted. If Zea is tegular then Zea is unsalted. If Zea is unsalted and Zea is medical then Zea is shorn. Smart, shorn things are boastful. If Zea is tegular then Zea is shorn. If Zea is boastful and Zea is tegular then Zea is molar. Rough, mass things are unsalted. Zea is not shorn.", "logic": "\nMolar(zea)\nTegular(pascal)\nforall x (Molar(x) -> Tegular(x))\nMolar(pascal) -> Unsalted(pascal)\nTegular(zea) -> Unsalted(zea)\nUnsalted(zea) and Medical(zea) -> Shorn(zea)\nforall x (Molar(x) and Shorn(x) -> Boastful(x))\nTegular(zea) -> Shorn(zea)\nBoastful(zea) and Tegular(zea) -> Molar(zea)\nforall x (Medical(x) and Mass(x) -> Unsalted(x))\n\nnot Shorn(zea)\n\nMolar(zea) and forall x (Molar(x) -> Tegular(x)) -> therefore Tegular(zea) Tegular(zea) and Tegular(zea) -> Shorn(zea) -> therefore Shorn(zea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Celeste is chancy. Russ is uneven. All chancy things are uneven. If Russ is chancy then Russ is womanish. If Celeste is uneven then Celeste is womanish. If Celeste is womanish and Celeste is smokeless then Celeste is humbled. Smart, humbled things are refreshful. If Celeste is uneven then Celeste is humbled. If Celeste is refreshful and Celeste is uneven then Celeste is chancy. Rough, nettlesome things are womanish. Celeste is refreshful.", "logic": "\nChancy(celeste)\nUneven(russ)\nforall x (Chancy(x) -> Uneven(x))\nChancy(russ) -> Womanish(russ)\nUneven(celeste) -> Womanish(celeste)\nWomanish(celeste) and Smokeless(celeste) -> Humbled(celeste)\nforall x (Chancy(x) and Humbled(x) -> Refreshful(x))\nUneven(celeste) -> Humbled(celeste)\nRefreshful(celeste) and Uneven(celeste) -> Chancy(celeste)\nforall x (Smokeless(x) and Nettlesome(x) -> Womanish(x))\n\nRefreshful(celeste)\n\nChancy(celeste) and forall x (Chancy(x) -> Uneven(x)) -> therefore Uneven(celeste) Uneven(celeste) and Uneven(celeste) -> Humbled(celeste) -> therefore Humbled(celeste) Chancy(celeste) and Humbled(celeste) and forall x (Chancy(x) and Humbled(x) -> Refreshful(x)) -> therefore Refreshful(celeste)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Mollee is biconvex. Rosario is ordained. All biconvex things are ordained. If Rosario is biconvex then Rosario is xlviii. If Mollee is ordained then Mollee is xlviii. If Mollee is xlviii and Mollee is unrevised then Mollee is lyrical. Smart, lyrical things are allogamous. If Mollee is ordained then Mollee is lyrical. If Mollee is allogamous and Mollee is ordained then Mollee is biconvex. Rough, unwedded things are xlviii. Mollee is not allogamous.", "logic": "\nBiconvex(mollee)\nOrdained(rosario)\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> Ordained(x))\nBiconvex(rosario) -> Xlviii(rosario)\nOrdained(mollee) -> Xlviii(mollee)\nXlviii(mollee) and Unrevised(mollee) -> Lyrical(mollee)\nforall x (Biconvex(x) and Lyrical(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nOrdained(mollee) -> Lyrical(mollee)\nAllogamous(mollee) and Ordained(mollee) -> Biconvex(mollee)\nforall x (Unrevised(x) and Unwedded(x) -> Xlviii(x))\n\nnot Allogamous(mollee)\n\nBiconvex(mollee) and forall x (Biconvex(x) -> Ordained(x)) -> therefore Ordained(mollee) Ordained(mollee) and Ordained(mollee) -> Lyrical(mollee) -> therefore Lyrical(mollee) Biconvex(mollee) and Lyrical(mollee) and forall x (Biconvex(x) and Lyrical(x) -> Allogamous(x)) -> therefore Allogamous(mollee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Aprilette is sphingine. Marwin is equine. All sphingine things are equine. If Marwin is sphingine then Marwin is rootbound. If Aprilette is equine then Aprilette is rootbound. If Aprilette is rootbound and Aprilette is hired then Aprilette is hesperian. Smart, hesperian things are lateen. If Aprilette is equine then Aprilette is hesperian. If Aprilette is lateen and Aprilette is equine then Aprilette is sphingine. Rough, demoniacal things are rootbound. Marwin is not lateen.", "logic": "\nSphingine(aprilette)\nEquine(marwin)\nforall x (Sphingine(x) -> Equine(x))\nSphingine(marwin) -> Rootbound(marwin)\nEquine(aprilette) -> Rootbound(aprilette)\nRootbound(aprilette) and Hired(aprilette) -> Hesperian(aprilette)\nforall x (Sphingine(x) and Hesperian(x) -> Lateen(x))\nEquine(aprilette) -> Hesperian(aprilette)\nLateen(aprilette) and Equine(aprilette) -> Sphingine(aprilette)\nforall x (Hired(x) and Demoniacal(x) -> Rootbound(x))\n\nnot Lateen(marwin)\n\nforall x (Sphingine(x) and Hesperian(x) -> Lateen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Geraldina is brummagem. Erl is knotty. All brummagem things are knotty. If Erl is brummagem then Erl is clamorous. If Geraldina is knotty then Geraldina is clamorous. If Geraldina is clamorous and Geraldina is monumental then Geraldina is oval. Smart, oval things are ineffable. If Geraldina is knotty then Geraldina is oval. If Geraldina is ineffable and Geraldina is knotty then Geraldina is brummagem. Rough, equipotent things are clamorous. Erl is clamorous.", "logic": "\nBrummagem(geraldina)\nKnotty(erl)\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Knotty(x))\nBrummagem(erl) -> Clamorous(erl)\nKnotty(geraldina) -> Clamorous(geraldina)\nClamorous(geraldina) and Monumental(geraldina) -> Oval(geraldina)\nforall x (Brummagem(x) and Oval(x) -> Ineffable(x))\nKnotty(geraldina) -> Oval(geraldina)\nIneffable(geraldina) and Knotty(geraldina) -> Brummagem(geraldina)\nforall x (Monumental(x) and Equipotent(x) -> Clamorous(x))\n\nClamorous(erl)\n\nBrummagem(erl) -> Clamorous(erl) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Kalila is evocative. Angel is costive. All evocative things are costive. If Angel is evocative then Angel is daft. If Kalila is costive then Kalila is daft. If Kalila is daft and Kalila is highborn then Kalila is sprigged. Smart, sprigged things are luculent. If Kalila is costive then Kalila is sprigged. If Kalila is luculent and Kalila is costive then Kalila is evocative. Rough, angolan things are daft. Angel is not sprigged.", "logic": "\nEvocative(kalila)\nCostive(angel)\nforall x (Evocative(x) -> Costive(x))\nEvocative(angel) -> Daft(angel)\nCostive(kalila) -> Daft(kalila)\nDaft(kalila) and Highborn(kalila) -> Sprigged(kalila)\nforall x (Evocative(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Luculent(x))\nCostive(kalila) -> Sprigged(kalila)\nLuculent(kalila) and Costive(kalila) -> Evocative(kalila)\nforall x (Highborn(x) and Angolan(x) -> Daft(x))\n\nnot Sprigged(angel)\n\nnot Sprigged(angel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Jacinda is aggravated. Madelle is spondaic. All aggravated things are spondaic. If Madelle is aggravated then Madelle is away. If Jacinda is spondaic then Jacinda is away. If Jacinda is away and Jacinda is yellowed then Jacinda is addled. Smart, addled things are unliterary. If Jacinda is spondaic then Jacinda is addled. If Jacinda is unliterary and Jacinda is spondaic then Jacinda is aggravated. Rough, stormy things are away. Madelle is stormy.", "logic": "\nAggravated(jacinda)\nSpondaic(madelle)\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Spondaic(x))\nAggravated(madelle) -> Away(madelle)\nSpondaic(jacinda) -> Away(jacinda)\nAway(jacinda) and Yellowed(jacinda) -> Addled(jacinda)\nforall x (Aggravated(x) and Addled(x) -> Unliterary(x))\nSpondaic(jacinda) -> Addled(jacinda)\nUnliterary(jacinda) and Spondaic(jacinda) -> Aggravated(jacinda)\nforall x (Yellowed(x) and Stormy(x) -> Away(x))\n\nStormy(madelle)\n\nStormy(madelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Sonnie is glaucous. Bearnard is orotund. All glaucous things are orotund. If Bearnard is glaucous then Bearnard is bellied. If Sonnie is orotund then Sonnie is bellied. If Sonnie is bellied and Sonnie is ungrasped then Sonnie is dissolute. Smart, dissolute things are muggy. If Sonnie is orotund then Sonnie is dissolute. If Sonnie is muggy and Sonnie is orotund then Sonnie is glaucous. Rough, aeolian things are bellied. Bearnard is not ungrasped.", "logic": "\nGlaucous(sonnie)\nOrotund(bearnard)\nforall x (Glaucous(x) -> Orotund(x))\nGlaucous(bearnard) -> Bellied(bearnard)\nOrotund(sonnie) -> Bellied(sonnie)\nBellied(sonnie) and Ungrasped(sonnie) -> Dissolute(sonnie)\nforall x (Glaucous(x) and Dissolute(x) -> Muggy(x))\nOrotund(sonnie) -> Dissolute(sonnie)\nMuggy(sonnie) and Orotund(sonnie) -> Glaucous(sonnie)\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Bellied(x))\n\nnot Ungrasped(bearnard)\n\nnot Ungrasped(bearnard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Kelley is neutral. Dorrie is gouty. All neutral things are gouty. If Dorrie is neutral then Dorrie is rococo. If Kelley is gouty then Kelley is rococo. If Kelley is rococo and Kelley is maniclike then Kelley is aeronautic. Smart, aeronautic things are unbearable. If Kelley is gouty then Kelley is aeronautic. If Kelley is unbearable and Kelley is gouty then Kelley is neutral. Rough, overblown things are rococo. Dorrie is neutral.", "logic": "\nNeutral(kelley)\nGouty(dorrie)\nforall x (Neutral(x) -> Gouty(x))\nNeutral(dorrie) -> Rococo(dorrie)\nGouty(kelley) -> Rococo(kelley)\nRococo(kelley) and Maniclike(kelley) -> Aeronautic(kelley)\nforall x (Neutral(x) and Aeronautic(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nGouty(kelley) -> Aeronautic(kelley)\nUnbearable(kelley) and Gouty(kelley) -> Neutral(kelley)\nforall x (Maniclike(x) and Overblown(x) -> Rococo(x))\n\nNeutral(dorrie)\n\nNeutral(dorrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Dore is rocklike. Roxana is husbandly. All rocklike things are husbandly. If Roxana is rocklike then Roxana is stupefying. If Dore is husbandly then Dore is stupefying. If Dore is stupefying and Dore is plumbable then Dore is consummate. Smart, consummate things are jittery. If Dore is husbandly then Dore is consummate. If Dore is jittery and Dore is husbandly then Dore is rocklike. Rough, loved things are stupefying. Dore is not loved.", "logic": "\nRocklike(dore)\nHusbandly(roxana)\nforall x (Rocklike(x) -> Husbandly(x))\nRocklike(roxana) -> Stupefying(roxana)\nHusbandly(dore) -> Stupefying(dore)\nStupefying(dore) and Plumbable(dore) -> Consummate(dore)\nforall x (Rocklike(x) and Consummate(x) -> Jittery(x))\nHusbandly(dore) -> Consummate(dore)\nJittery(dore) and Husbandly(dore) -> Rocklike(dore)\nforall x (Plumbable(x) and Loved(x) -> Stupefying(x))\n\nnot Loved(dore)\n\nnot Loved(dore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "Paton is bauxitic. Nedda is treelike. All bauxitic things are treelike. If Nedda is bauxitic then Nedda is rattled. If Paton is treelike then Paton is rattled. If Paton is rattled and Paton is crackle then Paton is predacious. Smart, predacious things are curved. If Paton is treelike then Paton is predacious. If Paton is curved and Paton is treelike then Paton is bauxitic. Rough, stalinist things are rattled. Paton is crackle.", "logic": "\nBauxitic(paton)\nTreelike(nedda)\nforall x (Bauxitic(x) -> Treelike(x))\nBauxitic(nedda) -> Rattled(nedda)\nTreelike(paton) -> Rattled(paton)\nRattled(paton) and Crackle(paton) -> Predacious(paton)\nforall x (Bauxitic(x) and Predacious(x) -> Curved(x))\nTreelike(paton) -> Predacious(paton)\nCurved(paton) and Treelike(paton) -> Bauxitic(paton)\nforall x (Crackle(x) and Stalinist(x) -> Rattled(x))\n\nCrackle(paton)\n\nCrackle(paton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1036"} {"premises": "The brenna is scented. If something is atlantic then it is gordian. If the brenna is scented then the brenna is atlantic. If something is indignant and atlantic then it is scented. Green things are premedical. If something is indignant and premedical then it is gordian. If the brenna is indignant then the brenna is atlantic. The brenna is scented.", "logic": "\nScented(brenna)\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Gordian(x))\nScented(brenna) -> Atlantic(brenna)\nforall x (Indignant(x) and Atlantic(x) -> Scented(x))\nforall x (Gordian(x) -> Premedical(x))\nforall x (Indignant(x) and Premedical(x) -> Gordian(x))\nIndignant(brenna) -> Atlantic(brenna)\n\nScented(brenna)\n\ntherefore Scented(brenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The cicely is narrowing. If something is ageing then it is ripened. If the cicely is narrowing then the cicely is ageing. If something is unsullied and ageing then it is narrowing. Green things are swordlike. If something is unsullied and swordlike then it is ripened. If the cicely is unsullied then the cicely is ageing. The cicely is not narrowing.", "logic": "\nNarrowing(cicely)\nforall x (Ageing(x) -> Ripened(x))\nNarrowing(cicely) -> Ageing(cicely)\nforall x (Unsullied(x) and Ageing(x) -> Narrowing(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Swordlike(x))\nforall x (Unsullied(x) and Swordlike(x) -> Ripened(x))\nUnsullied(cicely) -> Ageing(cicely)\n\nnot Narrowing(cicely)\n\ntherefore Narrowing(cicely)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The flo is icebound. If something is catechetic then it is lesser. If the flo is icebound then the flo is catechetic. If something is cathectic and catechetic then it is icebound. Green things are world. If something is cathectic and world then it is lesser. If the flo is cathectic then the flo is catechetic. The flo is catechetic.", "logic": "\nIcebound(flo)\nforall x (Catechetic(x) -> Lesser(x))\nIcebound(flo) -> Catechetic(flo)\nforall x (Cathectic(x) and Catechetic(x) -> Icebound(x))\nforall x (Lesser(x) -> World(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) and World(x) -> Lesser(x))\nCathectic(flo) -> Catechetic(flo)\n\nCatechetic(flo)\n\nIcebound(flo) and Icebound(flo) -> Catechetic(flo) -> therefore Catechetic(flo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The austen is vanished. If something is cancerous then it is projectile. If the austen is vanished then the austen is cancerous. If something is mercurial and cancerous then it is vanished. Green things are knitted. If something is mercurial and knitted then it is projectile. If the austen is mercurial then the austen is cancerous. The austen is not cancerous.", "logic": "\nVanished(austen)\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> Projectile(x))\nVanished(austen) -> Cancerous(austen)\nforall x (Mercurial(x) and Cancerous(x) -> Vanished(x))\nforall x (Projectile(x) -> Knitted(x))\nforall x (Mercurial(x) and Knitted(x) -> Projectile(x))\nMercurial(austen) -> Cancerous(austen)\n\nnot Cancerous(austen)\n\nVanished(austen) and Vanished(austen) -> Cancerous(austen) -> therefore Cancerous(austen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The abagail is outmost. If something is wacky then it is polyatomic. If the abagail is outmost then the abagail is wacky. If something is scant and wacky then it is outmost. Green things are maleficent. If something is scant and maleficent then it is polyatomic. If the abagail is scant then the abagail is wacky. The abagail is polyatomic.", "logic": "\nOutmost(abagail)\nforall x (Wacky(x) -> Polyatomic(x))\nOutmost(abagail) -> Wacky(abagail)\nforall x (Scant(x) and Wacky(x) -> Outmost(x))\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Scant(x) and Maleficent(x) -> Polyatomic(x))\nScant(abagail) -> Wacky(abagail)\n\nPolyatomic(abagail)\n\nOutmost(abagail) and Outmost(abagail) -> Wacky(abagail) -> therefore Wacky(abagail) Wacky(abagail) and forall x (Wacky(x) -> Polyatomic(x)) -> therefore Polyatomic(abagail)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The horace is nonmoving. If something is untraveled then it is gestural. If the horace is nonmoving then the horace is untraveled. If something is footed and untraveled then it is nonmoving. Green things are barrelled. If something is footed and barrelled then it is gestural. If the horace is footed then the horace is untraveled. The horace is not gestural.", "logic": "\nNonmoving(horace)\nforall x (Untraveled(x) -> Gestural(x))\nNonmoving(horace) -> Untraveled(horace)\nforall x (Footed(x) and Untraveled(x) -> Nonmoving(x))\nforall x (Gestural(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nforall x (Footed(x) and Barrelled(x) -> Gestural(x))\nFooted(horace) -> Untraveled(horace)\n\nnot Gestural(horace)\n\nNonmoving(horace) and Nonmoving(horace) -> Untraveled(horace) -> therefore Untraveled(horace) Untraveled(horace) and forall x (Untraveled(x) -> Gestural(x)) -> therefore Gestural(horace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The nickey is crinkled. If something is cloaked then it is hexangular. If the nickey is crinkled then the nickey is cloaked. If something is clxxx and cloaked then it is crinkled. Green things are gangly. If something is clxxx and gangly then it is hexangular. If the nickey is clxxx then the nickey is cloaked. The nickey is gangly.", "logic": "\nCrinkled(nickey)\nforall x (Cloaked(x) -> Hexangular(x))\nCrinkled(nickey) -> Cloaked(nickey)\nforall x (Clxxx(x) and Cloaked(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Clxxx(x) and Gangly(x) -> Hexangular(x))\nClxxx(nickey) -> Cloaked(nickey)\n\nGangly(nickey)\n\nCrinkled(nickey) and Crinkled(nickey) -> Cloaked(nickey) -> therefore Cloaked(nickey) Cloaked(nickey) and forall x (Cloaked(x) -> Hexangular(x)) -> therefore Hexangular(nickey) Hexangular(nickey) and forall x (Hexangular(x) -> Gangly(x)) -> therefore Gangly(nickey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The ethan is becoming. If something is taut then it is imposing. If the ethan is becoming then the ethan is taut. If something is inexplicit and taut then it is becoming. Green things are calcitic. If something is inexplicit and calcitic then it is imposing. If the ethan is inexplicit then the ethan is taut. The ethan is not calcitic.", "logic": "\nBecoming(ethan)\nforall x (Taut(x) -> Imposing(x))\nBecoming(ethan) -> Taut(ethan)\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) and Taut(x) -> Becoming(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) -> Calcitic(x))\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) and Calcitic(x) -> Imposing(x))\nInexplicit(ethan) -> Taut(ethan)\n\nnot Calcitic(ethan)\n\nBecoming(ethan) and Becoming(ethan) -> Taut(ethan) -> therefore Taut(ethan) Taut(ethan) and forall x (Taut(x) -> Imposing(x)) -> therefore Imposing(ethan) Imposing(ethan) and forall x (Imposing(x) -> Calcitic(x)) -> therefore Calcitic(ethan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The amelita is adiabatic. If something is lobular then it is golden. If the amelita is adiabatic then the amelita is lobular. If something is equipotent and lobular then it is adiabatic. Green things are polygenic. If something is equipotent and polygenic then it is golden. If the amelita is equipotent then the amelita is lobular. The amelita is not equipotent.", "logic": "\nAdiabatic(amelita)\nforall x (Lobular(x) -> Golden(x))\nAdiabatic(amelita) -> Lobular(amelita)\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Lobular(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Golden(x) -> Polygenic(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Polygenic(x) -> Golden(x))\nEquipotent(amelita) -> Lobular(amelita)\n\nnot Equipotent(amelita)\n\nnot Equipotent(amelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The powell is basinal. If something is flippant then it is volumetric. If the powell is basinal then the powell is flippant. If something is ringed and flippant then it is basinal. Green things are unartistic. If something is ringed and unartistic then it is volumetric. If the powell is ringed then the powell is flippant. The powell needs the powell.", "logic": "\nBasinal(powell)\nforall x (Flippant(x) -> Volumetric(x))\nBasinal(powell) -> Flippant(powell)\nforall x (Ringed(x) and Flippant(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Volumetric(x) -> Unartistic(x))\nforall x (Ringed(x) and Unartistic(x) -> Volumetric(x))\nRinged(powell) -> Flippant(powell)\n\nNeeds(powell, powell)\n\nNeeds(powell, powell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The carmen is oviparous. If something is xxvii then it is studious. If the carmen is oviparous then the carmen is xxvii. If something is nodular and xxvii then it is oviparous. Green things are flighty. If something is nodular and flighty then it is studious. If the carmen is nodular then the carmen is xxvii. The carmen does not eat the carmen.", "logic": "\nOviparous(carmen)\nforall x (Xxvii(x) -> Studious(x))\nOviparous(carmen) -> Xxvii(carmen)\nforall x (Nodular(x) and Xxvii(x) -> Oviparous(x))\nforall x (Studious(x) -> Flighty(x))\nforall x (Nodular(x) and Flighty(x) -> Studious(x))\nNodular(carmen) -> Xxvii(carmen)\n\nnot Eats(carmen, carmen)\n\nnot Eats(carmen, carmen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The loria is coral. If something is uncolumned then it is phobic. If the loria is coral then the loria is uncolumned. If something is unworkable and uncolumned then it is coral. Green things are unrimed. If something is unworkable and unrimed then it is phobic. If the loria is unworkable then the loria is uncolumned. The loria likes the loria.", "logic": "\nCoral(loria)\nforall x (Uncolumned(x) -> Phobic(x))\nCoral(loria) -> Uncolumned(loria)\nforall x (Unworkable(x) and Uncolumned(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Phobic(x) -> Unrimed(x))\nforall x (Unworkable(x) and Unrimed(x) -> Phobic(x))\nUnworkable(loria) -> Uncolumned(loria)\n\nLikes(loria, loria)\n\nLikes(loria, loria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Paddie is bootless. Paddie is unvarying. Katharyn is bootless. Katharyn is actionable. Katharyn is lobated. Jeraldine is unvarying. Jeraldine is loquacious. Jeraldine is miasmal. Henrique is lobated. Henrique is sciatic. Furry people are unvarying. If Henrique is lobated then Henrique is actionable. All bootless people are actionable. Kind people are sciatic. If someone is unvarying and miasmal then they are lobated. All bootless, actionable people are miasmal. If someone is actionable and sciatic then they are lobated. All unvarying, loquacious people are sciatic. Paddie is bootless.", "logic": "\nBootless(paddie)\nUnvarying(paddie)\nBootless(katharyn)\nActionable(katharyn)\nLobated(katharyn)\nUnvarying(jeraldine)\nLoquacious(jeraldine)\nMiasmal(jeraldine)\nLobated(henrique)\nSciatic(henrique)\nforall x (Loquacious(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nLobated(henrique) -> Actionable(henrique)\nforall x (Bootless(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Sciatic(x))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) and Miasmal(x) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Actionable(x) -> Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Actionable(x) and Sciatic(x) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) and Loquacious(x) -> Sciatic(x))\n\nBootless(paddie)\n\ntherefore Bootless(paddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Jimmy is restive. Jimmy is tamable. Geoffrey is restive. Geoffrey is apogean. Geoffrey is roaring. Nanon is tamable. Nanon is formidable. Nanon is disposable. Blanca is roaring. Blanca is doric. Furry people are tamable. If Blanca is roaring then Blanca is apogean. All restive people are apogean. Kind people are doric. If someone is tamable and disposable then they are roaring. All restive, apogean people are disposable. If someone is apogean and doric then they are roaring. All tamable, formidable people are doric. Jimmy is not tamable.", "logic": "\nRestive(jimmy)\nTamable(jimmy)\nRestive(geoffrey)\nApogean(geoffrey)\nRoaring(geoffrey)\nTamable(nanon)\nFormidable(nanon)\nDisposable(nanon)\nRoaring(blanca)\nDoric(blanca)\nforall x (Formidable(x) -> Tamable(x))\nRoaring(blanca) -> Apogean(blanca)\nforall x (Restive(x) -> Apogean(x))\nforall x (Apogean(x) -> Doric(x))\nforall x (Tamable(x) and Disposable(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) and Apogean(x) -> Disposable(x))\nforall x (Apogean(x) and Doric(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Tamable(x) and Formidable(x) -> Doric(x))\n\nnot Tamable(jimmy)\n\ntherefore Tamable(jimmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Angelia is coriaceous. Angelia is unwieldy. Berte is coriaceous. Berte is digressive. Berte is thousandth. Pamelina is unwieldy. Pamelina is eighteen. Pamelina is leaved. Laurens is thousandth. Laurens is diabetic. Furry people are unwieldy. If Laurens is thousandth then Laurens is digressive. All coriaceous people are digressive. Kind people are diabetic. If someone is unwieldy and leaved then they are thousandth. All coriaceous, digressive people are leaved. If someone is digressive and diabetic then they are thousandth. All unwieldy, eighteen people are diabetic. Laurens is digressive.", "logic": "\nCoriaceous(angelia)\nUnwieldy(angelia)\nCoriaceous(berte)\nDigressive(berte)\nThousandth(berte)\nUnwieldy(pamelina)\nEighteen(pamelina)\nLeaved(pamelina)\nThousandth(laurens)\nDiabetic(laurens)\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Unwieldy(x))\nThousandth(laurens) -> Digressive(laurens)\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Digressive(x) -> Diabetic(x))\nforall x (Unwieldy(x) and Leaved(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and Digressive(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Digressive(x) and Diabetic(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Unwieldy(x) and Eighteen(x) -> Diabetic(x))\n\nDigressive(laurens)\n\nThousandth(laurens) and Thousandth(laurens) -> Digressive(laurens) -> therefore Digressive(laurens)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Zed is laotian. Zed is hedged. Marlyn is laotian. Marlyn is redemptory. Marlyn is fingerlike. Pia is hedged. Pia is unheralded. Pia is hypethral. Julieta is fingerlike. Julieta is statuesque. Furry people are hedged. If Julieta is fingerlike then Julieta is redemptory. All laotian people are redemptory. Kind people are statuesque. If someone is hedged and hypethral then they are fingerlike. All laotian, redemptory people are hypethral. If someone is redemptory and statuesque then they are fingerlike. All hedged, unheralded people are statuesque. Zed is not redemptory.", "logic": "\nLaotian(zed)\nHedged(zed)\nLaotian(marlyn)\nRedemptory(marlyn)\nFingerlike(marlyn)\nHedged(pia)\nUnheralded(pia)\nHypethral(pia)\nFingerlike(julieta)\nStatuesque(julieta)\nforall x (Unheralded(x) -> Hedged(x))\nFingerlike(julieta) -> Redemptory(julieta)\nforall x (Laotian(x) -> Redemptory(x))\nforall x (Redemptory(x) -> Statuesque(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Hypethral(x) -> Fingerlike(x))\nforall x (Laotian(x) and Redemptory(x) -> Hypethral(x))\nforall x (Redemptory(x) and Statuesque(x) -> Fingerlike(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Unheralded(x) -> Statuesque(x))\n\nnot Redemptory(zed)\n\nLaotian(zed) and forall x (Laotian(x) -> Redemptory(x)) -> therefore Redemptory(zed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Ignaz is cataleptic. Ignaz is slurred. Harrie is cataleptic. Harrie is bettering. Harrie is intimate. Fatima is slurred. Fatima is center. Fatima is answering. Aime is intimate. Aime is rank. Furry people are slurred. If Aime is intimate then Aime is bettering. All cataleptic people are bettering. Kind people are rank. If someone is slurred and answering then they are intimate. All cataleptic, bettering people are answering. If someone is bettering and rank then they are intimate. All slurred, center people are rank. Ignaz is rank.", "logic": "\nCataleptic(ignaz)\nSlurred(ignaz)\nCataleptic(harrie)\nBettering(harrie)\nIntimate(harrie)\nSlurred(fatima)\nCenter(fatima)\nAnswering(fatima)\nIntimate(aime)\nRank(aime)\nforall x (Center(x) -> Slurred(x))\nIntimate(aime) -> Bettering(aime)\nforall x (Cataleptic(x) -> Bettering(x))\nforall x (Bettering(x) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) and Answering(x) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Cataleptic(x) and Bettering(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Bettering(x) and Rank(x) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) and Center(x) -> Rank(x))\n\nRank(ignaz)\n\nCataleptic(ignaz) and forall x (Cataleptic(x) -> Bettering(x)) -> therefore Bettering(ignaz) Bettering(ignaz) and forall x (Bettering(x) -> Rank(x)) -> therefore Rank(ignaz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Babette is unwebbed. Babette is macerative. Brigida is unwebbed. Brigida is advisable. Brigida is unpowered. Marmaduke is macerative. Marmaduke is hassidic. Marmaduke is tottering. Avivah is unpowered. Avivah is stemmatic. Furry people are macerative. If Avivah is unpowered then Avivah is advisable. All unwebbed people are advisable. Kind people are stemmatic. If someone is macerative and tottering then they are unpowered. All unwebbed, advisable people are tottering. If someone is advisable and stemmatic then they are unpowered. All macerative, hassidic people are stemmatic. Babette is not tottering.", "logic": "\nUnwebbed(babette)\nMacerative(babette)\nUnwebbed(brigida)\nAdvisable(brigida)\nUnpowered(brigida)\nMacerative(marmaduke)\nHassidic(marmaduke)\nTottering(marmaduke)\nUnpowered(avivah)\nStemmatic(avivah)\nforall x (Hassidic(x) -> Macerative(x))\nUnpowered(avivah) -> Advisable(avivah)\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) -> Advisable(x))\nforall x (Advisable(x) -> Stemmatic(x))\nforall x (Macerative(x) and Tottering(x) -> Unpowered(x))\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) and Advisable(x) -> Tottering(x))\nforall x (Advisable(x) and Stemmatic(x) -> Unpowered(x))\nforall x (Macerative(x) and Hassidic(x) -> Stemmatic(x))\n\nnot Tottering(babette)\n\nUnwebbed(babette) and forall x (Unwebbed(x) -> Advisable(x)) -> therefore Advisable(babette) Unwebbed(babette) and Advisable(babette) and forall x (Unwebbed(x) and Advisable(x) -> Tottering(x)) -> therefore Tottering(babette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Austina is furnished. Austina is asat. Wendie is furnished. Wendie is melted. Wendie is pouring. Nidia is asat. Nidia is european. Nidia is ninefold. Jermaine is pouring. Jermaine is glinting. Furry people are asat. If Jermaine is pouring then Jermaine is melted. All furnished people are melted. Kind people are glinting. If someone is asat and ninefold then they are pouring. All furnished, melted people are ninefold. If someone is melted and glinting then they are pouring. All asat, european people are glinting. Austina is pouring.", "logic": "\nFurnished(austina)\nAsat(austina)\nFurnished(wendie)\nMelted(wendie)\nPouring(wendie)\nAsat(nidia)\nEuropean(nidia)\nNinefold(nidia)\nPouring(jermaine)\nGlinting(jermaine)\nforall x (European(x) -> Asat(x))\nPouring(jermaine) -> Melted(jermaine)\nforall x (Furnished(x) -> Melted(x))\nforall x (Melted(x) -> Glinting(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Pouring(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) and Melted(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Melted(x) and Glinting(x) -> Pouring(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) and European(x) -> Glinting(x))\n\nPouring(austina)\n\nFurnished(austina) and forall x (Furnished(x) -> Melted(x)) -> therefore Melted(austina) Furnished(austina) and Melted(austina) and forall x (Furnished(x) and Melted(x) -> Ninefold(x)) -> therefore Ninefold(austina) Asat(austina) and Ninefold(austina) and forall x (Asat(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Pouring(x)) -> therefore Pouring(austina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Suzetta is nonfatal. Suzetta is neuronal. Stephanus is nonfatal. Stephanus is narcotic. Stephanus is manichaean. Eleanor is neuronal. Eleanor is pearly. Eleanor is pained. Gwenette is manichaean. Gwenette is eolotropic. Furry people are neuronal. If Gwenette is manichaean then Gwenette is narcotic. All nonfatal people are narcotic. Kind people are eolotropic. If someone is neuronal and pained then they are manichaean. All nonfatal, narcotic people are pained. If someone is narcotic and eolotropic then they are manichaean. All neuronal, pearly people are eolotropic. Suzetta is not manichaean.", "logic": "\nNonfatal(suzetta)\nNeuronal(suzetta)\nNonfatal(stephanus)\nNarcotic(stephanus)\nManichaean(stephanus)\nNeuronal(eleanor)\nPearly(eleanor)\nPained(eleanor)\nManichaean(gwenette)\nEolotropic(gwenette)\nforall x (Pearly(x) -> Neuronal(x))\nManichaean(gwenette) -> Narcotic(gwenette)\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Narcotic(x) -> Eolotropic(x))\nforall x (Neuronal(x) and Pained(x) -> Manichaean(x))\nforall x (Nonfatal(x) and Narcotic(x) -> Pained(x))\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Eolotropic(x) -> Manichaean(x))\nforall x (Neuronal(x) and Pearly(x) -> Eolotropic(x))\n\nnot Manichaean(suzetta)\n\nNonfatal(suzetta) and forall x (Nonfatal(x) -> Narcotic(x)) -> therefore Narcotic(suzetta) Nonfatal(suzetta) and Narcotic(suzetta) and forall x (Nonfatal(x) and Narcotic(x) -> Pained(x)) -> therefore Pained(suzetta) Neuronal(suzetta) and Pained(suzetta) and forall x (Neuronal(x) and Pained(x) -> Manichaean(x)) -> therefore Manichaean(suzetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Renata is crapulent. Renata is avellan. Mead is crapulent. Mead is productive. Mead is sunk. Kristy is avellan. Kristy is wavelike. Kristy is unifoliate. Tuck is sunk. Tuck is smashed. Furry people are avellan. If Tuck is sunk then Tuck is productive. All crapulent people are productive. Kind people are smashed. If someone is avellan and unifoliate then they are sunk. All crapulent, productive people are unifoliate. If someone is productive and smashed then they are sunk. All avellan, wavelike people are smashed. Kristy is not productive.", "logic": "\nCrapulent(renata)\nAvellan(renata)\nCrapulent(mead)\nProductive(mead)\nSunk(mead)\nAvellan(kristy)\nWavelike(kristy)\nUnifoliate(kristy)\nSunk(tuck)\nSmashed(tuck)\nforall x (Wavelike(x) -> Avellan(x))\nSunk(tuck) -> Productive(tuck)\nforall x (Crapulent(x) -> Productive(x))\nforall x (Productive(x) -> Smashed(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and Unifoliate(x) -> Sunk(x))\nforall x (Crapulent(x) and Productive(x) -> Unifoliate(x))\nforall x (Productive(x) and Smashed(x) -> Sunk(x))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and Wavelike(x) -> Smashed(x))\n\nnot Productive(kristy)\n\nforall x (Crapulent(x) -> Productive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Edith is bipartizan. Edith is dateable. Harlin is bipartizan. Harlin is modern. Harlin is undraped. Thomasin is dateable. Thomasin is rupicolous. Thomasin is demented. Somerset is undraped. Somerset is soupy. Furry people are dateable. If Somerset is undraped then Somerset is modern. All bipartizan people are modern. Kind people are soupy. If someone is dateable and demented then they are undraped. All bipartizan, modern people are demented. If someone is modern and soupy then they are undraped. All dateable, rupicolous people are soupy. Harlin is dateable.", "logic": "\nBipartizan(edith)\nDateable(edith)\nBipartizan(harlin)\nModern(harlin)\nUndraped(harlin)\nDateable(thomasin)\nRupicolous(thomasin)\nDemented(thomasin)\nUndraped(somerset)\nSoupy(somerset)\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) -> Dateable(x))\nUndraped(somerset) -> Modern(somerset)\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) -> Modern(x))\nforall x (Modern(x) -> Soupy(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) and Demented(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Bipartizan(x) and Modern(x) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Modern(x) and Soupy(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Dateable(x) and Rupicolous(x) -> Soupy(x))\n\nDateable(harlin)\n\nforall x (Rupicolous(x) -> Dateable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Lambert is fighting. Lambert is foliate. Catha is fighting. Catha is marly. Catha is monaural. Jeffrey is foliate. Jeffrey is needless. Jeffrey is habitual. Ron is monaural. Ron is blotched. Furry people are foliate. If Ron is monaural then Ron is marly. All fighting people are marly. Kind people are blotched. If someone is foliate and habitual then they are monaural. All fighting, marly people are habitual. If someone is marly and blotched then they are monaural. All foliate, needless people are blotched. Ron is not habitual.", "logic": "\nFighting(lambert)\nFoliate(lambert)\nFighting(catha)\nMarly(catha)\nMonaural(catha)\nFoliate(jeffrey)\nNeedless(jeffrey)\nHabitual(jeffrey)\nMonaural(ron)\nBlotched(ron)\nforall x (Needless(x) -> Foliate(x))\nMonaural(ron) -> Marly(ron)\nforall x (Fighting(x) -> Marly(x))\nforall x (Marly(x) -> Blotched(x))\nforall x (Foliate(x) and Habitual(x) -> Monaural(x))\nforall x (Fighting(x) and Marly(x) -> Habitual(x))\nforall x (Marly(x) and Blotched(x) -> Monaural(x))\nforall x (Foliate(x) and Needless(x) -> Blotched(x))\n\nnot Habitual(ron)\n\nforall x (Fighting(x) and Marly(x) -> Habitual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Melisande is fecal. Melisande is archival. Christa is fecal. Christa is formalised. Christa is ammoniacal. Lira is archival. Lira is westbound. Lira is geared. Tomlin is ammoniacal. Tomlin is sultry. Furry people are archival. If Tomlin is ammoniacal then Tomlin is formalised. All fecal people are formalised. Kind people are sultry. If someone is archival and geared then they are ammoniacal. All fecal, formalised people are geared. If someone is formalised and sultry then they are ammoniacal. All archival, westbound people are sultry. Tomlin is archival.", "logic": "\nFecal(melisande)\nArchival(melisande)\nFecal(christa)\nFormalised(christa)\nAmmoniacal(christa)\nArchival(lira)\nWestbound(lira)\nGeared(lira)\nAmmoniacal(tomlin)\nSultry(tomlin)\nforall x (Westbound(x) -> Archival(x))\nAmmoniacal(tomlin) -> Formalised(tomlin)\nforall x (Fecal(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) -> Sultry(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) and Geared(x) -> Ammoniacal(x))\nforall x (Fecal(x) and Formalised(x) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) and Sultry(x) -> Ammoniacal(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) and Westbound(x) -> Sultry(x))\n\nArchival(tomlin)\n\nforall x (Westbound(x) -> Archival(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Loria is liberal. Loria is scant. Gillie is liberal. Gillie is prefab. Gillie is distressed. Arlyne is scant. Arlyne is aleatory. Arlyne is unsheared. Whitaker is distressed. Whitaker is nefarious. Furry people are scant. If Whitaker is distressed then Whitaker is prefab. All liberal people are prefab. Kind people are nefarious. If someone is scant and unsheared then they are distressed. All liberal, prefab people are unsheared. If someone is prefab and nefarious then they are distressed. All scant, aleatory people are nefarious. Whitaker is not aleatory.", "logic": "\nLiberal(loria)\nScant(loria)\nLiberal(gillie)\nPrefab(gillie)\nDistressed(gillie)\nScant(arlyne)\nAleatory(arlyne)\nUnsheared(arlyne)\nDistressed(whitaker)\nNefarious(whitaker)\nforall x (Aleatory(x) -> Scant(x))\nDistressed(whitaker) -> Prefab(whitaker)\nforall x (Liberal(x) -> Prefab(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) -> Nefarious(x))\nforall x (Scant(x) and Unsheared(x) -> Distressed(x))\nforall x (Liberal(x) and Prefab(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Prefab(x) and Nefarious(x) -> Distressed(x))\nforall x (Scant(x) and Aleatory(x) -> Nefarious(x))\n\nnot Aleatory(whitaker)\n\nnot Aleatory(whitaker) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Bernita is potable. Bernita is multiform. Deb is potable. Deb is eponymic. Deb is exempt. Emmalyn is multiform. Emmalyn is ophthalmic. Emmalyn is helmeted. Rozalie is exempt. Rozalie is oaken. Furry people are multiform. If Rozalie is exempt then Rozalie is eponymic. All potable people are eponymic. Kind people are oaken. If someone is multiform and helmeted then they are exempt. All potable, eponymic people are helmeted. If someone is eponymic and oaken then they are exempt. All multiform, ophthalmic people are oaken. Emmalyn is potable.", "logic": "\nPotable(bernita)\nMultiform(bernita)\nPotable(deb)\nEponymic(deb)\nExempt(deb)\nMultiform(emmalyn)\nOphthalmic(emmalyn)\nHelmeted(emmalyn)\nExempt(rozalie)\nOaken(rozalie)\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) -> Multiform(x))\nExempt(rozalie) -> Eponymic(rozalie)\nforall x (Potable(x) -> Eponymic(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) -> Oaken(x))\nforall x (Multiform(x) and Helmeted(x) -> Exempt(x))\nforall x (Potable(x) and Eponymic(x) -> Helmeted(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and Oaken(x) -> Exempt(x))\nforall x (Multiform(x) and Ophthalmic(x) -> Oaken(x))\n\nPotable(emmalyn)\n\nPotable(emmalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Vic is propitious. Vic is inclined. Konstanze is propitious. Konstanze is starring. Konstanze is asat. Calla is inclined. Calla is noisome. Calla is removed. Darby is asat. Darby is measurable. Furry people are inclined. If Darby is asat then Darby is starring. All propitious people are starring. Kind people are measurable. If someone is inclined and removed then they are asat. All propitious, starring people are removed. If someone is starring and measurable then they are asat. All inclined, noisome people are measurable. Darby is not propitious.", "logic": "\nPropitious(vic)\nInclined(vic)\nPropitious(konstanze)\nStarring(konstanze)\nAsat(konstanze)\nInclined(calla)\nNoisome(calla)\nRemoved(calla)\nAsat(darby)\nMeasurable(darby)\nforall x (Noisome(x) -> Inclined(x))\nAsat(darby) -> Starring(darby)\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Starring(x))\nforall x (Starring(x) -> Measurable(x))\nforall x (Inclined(x) and Removed(x) -> Asat(x))\nforall x (Propitious(x) and Starring(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Starring(x) and Measurable(x) -> Asat(x))\nforall x (Inclined(x) and Noisome(x) -> Measurable(x))\n\nnot Propitious(darby)\n\nnot Propitious(darby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Trescha is clxx. Trescha is monodic. Riane is clxx. Riane is sandpapery. Riane is wifely. Tiebout is monodic. Tiebout is gaumless. Tiebout is driving. Rutger is wifely. Rutger is soulful. Furry people are monodic. If Rutger is wifely then Rutger is sandpapery. All clxx people are sandpapery. Kind people are soulful. If someone is monodic and driving then they are wifely. All clxx, sandpapery people are driving. If someone is sandpapery and soulful then they are wifely. All monodic, gaumless people are soulful. Trescha is gaumless.", "logic": "\nClxx(trescha)\nMonodic(trescha)\nClxx(riane)\nSandpapery(riane)\nWifely(riane)\nMonodic(tiebout)\nGaumless(tiebout)\nDriving(tiebout)\nWifely(rutger)\nSoulful(rutger)\nforall x (Gaumless(x) -> Monodic(x))\nWifely(rutger) -> Sandpapery(rutger)\nforall x (Clxx(x) -> Sandpapery(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) -> Soulful(x))\nforall x (Monodic(x) and Driving(x) -> Wifely(x))\nforall x (Clxx(x) and Sandpapery(x) -> Driving(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Soulful(x) -> Wifely(x))\nforall x (Monodic(x) and Gaumless(x) -> Soulful(x))\n\nGaumless(trescha)\n\nGaumless(trescha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1728"} {"premises": "Elva is harmless. Elva is salaried. Elva is allergenic. Elva is hangdog. Elva is eighteen. Elva is limbed. Elva is autoecious. If Elva is harmless and Elva is hangdog then Elva is limbed. All allergenic people are limbed. All eighteen people are harmless. Rough people are salaried. If Elva is eighteen then Elva is autoecious. If Elva is salaried and Elva is harmless then Elva is limbed. All hangdog, salaried people are harmless. Smart people are allergenic. Elva is eighteen.", "logic": "\nHarmless(elva)\nSalaried(elva)\nAllergenic(elva)\nHangdog(elva)\nEighteen(elva)\nLimbed(elva)\nAutoecious(elva)\nHarmless(elva) and Hangdog(elva) -> Limbed(elva)\nforall x (Allergenic(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Harmless(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) -> Salaried(x))\nEighteen(elva) -> Autoecious(elva)\nSalaried(elva) and Harmless(elva) -> Limbed(elva)\nforall x (Hangdog(x) and Salaried(x) -> Harmless(x))\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Allergenic(x))\n\nEighteen(elva)\n\ntherefore Eighteen(elva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4365"} {"premises": "Irita is bullate. Irita is wiccan. Irita is above. Irita is feverous. Irita is egocentric. Irita is crosstown. Irita is lxxvi. If Irita is bullate and Irita is feverous then Irita is crosstown. All above people are crosstown. All egocentric people are bullate. Rough people are wiccan. If Irita is egocentric then Irita is lxxvi. If Irita is wiccan and Irita is bullate then Irita is crosstown. All feverous, wiccan people are bullate. Smart people are above. Irita is not egocentric.", "logic": "\nBullate(irita)\nWiccan(irita)\nAbove(irita)\nFeverous(irita)\nEgocentric(irita)\nCrosstown(irita)\nLxxvi(irita)\nBullate(irita) and Feverous(irita) -> Crosstown(irita)\nforall x (Above(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) -> Bullate(x))\nforall x (Feverous(x) -> Wiccan(x))\nEgocentric(irita) -> Lxxvi(irita)\nWiccan(irita) and Bullate(irita) -> Crosstown(irita)\nforall x (Feverous(x) and Wiccan(x) -> Bullate(x))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) -> Above(x))\n\nnot Egocentric(irita)\n\ntherefore Egocentric(irita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4365"} {"premises": "The jose defraud the priscella. The jose defraud the dimitris. The jose is factorial. The jose is oafish. The jose is reformable. The jose liven the priscella. The priscella defraud the dimitris. The priscella assonate the dimitris. The priscella is not oafish. The priscella does not visit the dimitris. The dimitris defraud the jose. The dimitris assonate the jose. The dimitris does not eat the priscella. The dimitris is oafish. The dimitris liven the jose. The dimitris liven the priscella. If the priscella assonate the jose then the priscella defraud the jose. If something defraud the jose and the jose liven the priscella then the priscella assonate the jose. If something is oafish and it does not eat the jose then it is concealing. If something defraud the jose and the jose is oafish then it is concealing. If something is concealing and oafish then it assonate the dimitris. If something is oafish and it does not visit the dimitris then it assonate the dimitris. The jose is oafish.", "logic": "\nDefraud(jose, priscella)\nDefraud(jose, dimitris)\nFactorial(jose)\nOafish(jose)\nReformable(jose)\nLiven(jose, priscella)\nDefraud(priscella, dimitris)\nAssonate(priscella, dimitris)\nnot Oafish(priscella)\nnot Liven(priscella, dimitris)\nDefraud(dimitris, jose)\nAssonate(dimitris, jose)\nnot Assonate(dimitris, priscella)\nOafish(dimitris)\nLiven(dimitris, jose)\nLiven(dimitris, priscella)\nAssonate(priscella, jose) -> Defraud(priscella, jose)\nforall x (Defraud(x, jose) and Liven(jose, priscella) -> Assonate(priscella, jose))\nforall x (Oafish(x) and not Assonate(x, jose) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Defraud(x, jose) and Oafish(jose) -> Concealing(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) and Oafish(x) -> Assonate(x, dimitris))\nforall x (Oafish(x) and not Liven(x, dimitris) -> Assonate(x, dimitris))\n\nOafish(jose)\n\ntherefore Oafish(jose)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The claudette emplace the danette. The claudette emplace the vinni. The claudette is spiffing. The claudette is insulting. The claudette is palatable. The claudette surprise the danette. The danette emplace the vinni. The danette distort the vinni. The danette is not insulting. The danette does not visit the vinni. The vinni emplace the claudette. The vinni distort the claudette. The vinni does not eat the danette. The vinni is insulting. The vinni surprise the claudette. The vinni surprise the danette. If the danette distort the claudette then the danette emplace the claudette. If something emplace the claudette and the claudette surprise the danette then the danette distort the claudette. If something is insulting and it does not eat the claudette then it is interfaith. If something emplace the claudette and the claudette is insulting then it is interfaith. If something is interfaith and insulting then it distort the vinni. If something is insulting and it does not visit the vinni then it distort the vinni. The claudette does not visit the danette.", "logic": "\nEmplace(claudette, danette)\nEmplace(claudette, vinni)\nSpiffing(claudette)\nInsulting(claudette)\nPalatable(claudette)\nSurprise(claudette, danette)\nEmplace(danette, vinni)\nDistort(danette, vinni)\nnot Insulting(danette)\nnot Surprise(danette, vinni)\nEmplace(vinni, claudette)\nDistort(vinni, claudette)\nnot Distort(vinni, danette)\nInsulting(vinni)\nSurprise(vinni, claudette)\nSurprise(vinni, danette)\nDistort(danette, claudette) -> Emplace(danette, claudette)\nforall x (Emplace(x, claudette) and Surprise(claudette, danette) -> Distort(danette, claudette))\nforall x (Insulting(x) and not Distort(x, claudette) -> Interfaith(x))\nforall x (Emplace(x, claudette) and Insulting(claudette) -> Interfaith(x))\nforall x (Interfaith(x) and Insulting(x) -> Distort(x, vinni))\nforall x (Insulting(x) and not Surprise(x, vinni) -> Distort(x, vinni))\n\nnot Surprise(claudette, danette)\n\ntherefore Surprise(claudette, danette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The raymond pronate the bidget. The raymond pronate the elysee. The raymond is cleanable. The raymond is oviform. The raymond is sepaline. The raymond maintain the bidget. The bidget pronate the elysee. The bidget chin the elysee. The bidget is not oviform. The bidget does not visit the elysee. The elysee pronate the raymond. The elysee chin the raymond. The elysee does not eat the bidget. The elysee is oviform. The elysee maintain the raymond. The elysee maintain the bidget. If the bidget chin the raymond then the bidget pronate the raymond. If something pronate the raymond and the raymond maintain the bidget then the bidget chin the raymond. If something is oviform and it does not eat the raymond then it is tasteful. If something pronate the raymond and the raymond is oviform then it is tasteful. If something is tasteful and oviform then it chin the elysee. If something is oviform and it does not visit the elysee then it chin the elysee. The bidget chin the raymond.", "logic": "\nPronate(raymond, bidget)\nPronate(raymond, elysee)\nCleanable(raymond)\nOviform(raymond)\nSepaline(raymond)\nMaintain(raymond, bidget)\nPronate(bidget, elysee)\nChin(bidget, elysee)\nnot Oviform(bidget)\nnot Maintain(bidget, elysee)\nPronate(elysee, raymond)\nChin(elysee, raymond)\nnot Chin(elysee, bidget)\nOviform(elysee)\nMaintain(elysee, raymond)\nMaintain(elysee, bidget)\nChin(bidget, raymond) -> Pronate(bidget, raymond)\nforall x (Pronate(x, raymond) and Maintain(raymond, bidget) -> Chin(bidget, raymond))\nforall x (Oviform(x) and not Chin(x, raymond) -> Tasteful(x))\nforall x (Pronate(x, raymond) and Oviform(raymond) -> Tasteful(x))\nforall x (Tasteful(x) and Oviform(x) -> Chin(x, elysee))\nforall x (Oviform(x) and not Maintain(x, elysee) -> Chin(x, elysee))\n\nChin(bidget, raymond)\n\nPronate(elysee, raymond) and Maintain(raymond, bidget) and forall x (Pronate(x, raymond) and Maintain(raymond, bidget) -> Chin(bidget, raymond)) -> therefore Chin(bidget, raymond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The leela perjure the kittie. The leela perjure the nannette. The leela is adjusted. The leela is sheared. The leela is acoustic. The leela intermarry the kittie. The kittie perjure the nannette. The kittie cherish the nannette. The kittie is not sheared. The kittie does not visit the nannette. The nannette perjure the leela. The nannette cherish the leela. The nannette does not eat the kittie. The nannette is sheared. The nannette intermarry the leela. The nannette intermarry the kittie. If the kittie cherish the leela then the kittie perjure the leela. If something perjure the leela and the leela intermarry the kittie then the kittie cherish the leela. If something is sheared and it does not eat the leela then it is prefatory. If something perjure the leela and the leela is sheared then it is prefatory. If something is prefatory and sheared then it cherish the nannette. If something is sheared and it does not visit the nannette then it cherish the nannette. The kittie does not eat the leela.", "logic": "\nPerjure(leela, kittie)\nPerjure(leela, nannette)\nAdjusted(leela)\nSheared(leela)\nAcoustic(leela)\nIntermarry(leela, kittie)\nPerjure(kittie, nannette)\nCherish(kittie, nannette)\nnot Sheared(kittie)\nnot Intermarry(kittie, nannette)\nPerjure(nannette, leela)\nCherish(nannette, leela)\nnot Cherish(nannette, kittie)\nSheared(nannette)\nIntermarry(nannette, leela)\nIntermarry(nannette, kittie)\nCherish(kittie, leela) -> Perjure(kittie, leela)\nforall x (Perjure(x, leela) and Intermarry(leela, kittie) -> Cherish(kittie, leela))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and not Cherish(x, leela) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Perjure(x, leela) and Sheared(leela) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Prefatory(x) and Sheared(x) -> Cherish(x, nannette))\nforall x (Sheared(x) and not Intermarry(x, nannette) -> Cherish(x, nannette))\n\nnot Cherish(kittie, leela)\n\nPerjure(nannette, leela) and Intermarry(leela, kittie) and forall x (Perjure(x, leela) and Intermarry(leela, kittie) -> Cherish(kittie, leela)) -> therefore Cherish(kittie, leela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The vasili facsimile the mortimer. The vasili facsimile the prudi. The vasili is overmodest. The vasili is barefoot. The vasili is preachy. The vasili concertize the mortimer. The mortimer facsimile the prudi. The mortimer appeal the prudi. The mortimer is not barefoot. The mortimer does not visit the prudi. The prudi facsimile the vasili. The prudi appeal the vasili. The prudi does not eat the mortimer. The prudi is barefoot. The prudi concertize the vasili. The prudi concertize the mortimer. If the mortimer appeal the vasili then the mortimer facsimile the vasili. If something facsimile the vasili and the vasili concertize the mortimer then the mortimer appeal the vasili. If something is barefoot and it does not eat the vasili then it is linear. If something facsimile the vasili and the vasili is barefoot then it is linear. If something is linear and barefoot then it appeal the prudi. If something is barefoot and it does not visit the prudi then it appeal the prudi. The prudi appeal the prudi.", "logic": "\nFacsimile(vasili, mortimer)\nFacsimile(vasili, prudi)\nOvermodest(vasili)\nBarefoot(vasili)\nPreachy(vasili)\nConcertize(vasili, mortimer)\nFacsimile(mortimer, prudi)\nAppeal(mortimer, prudi)\nnot Barefoot(mortimer)\nnot Concertize(mortimer, prudi)\nFacsimile(prudi, vasili)\nAppeal(prudi, vasili)\nnot Appeal(prudi, mortimer)\nBarefoot(prudi)\nConcertize(prudi, vasili)\nConcertize(prudi, mortimer)\nAppeal(mortimer, vasili) -> Facsimile(mortimer, vasili)\nforall x (Facsimile(x, vasili) and Concertize(vasili, mortimer) -> Appeal(mortimer, vasili))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and not Appeal(x, vasili) -> Linear(x))\nforall x (Facsimile(x, vasili) and Barefoot(vasili) -> Linear(x))\nforall x (Linear(x) and Barefoot(x) -> Appeal(x, prudi))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and not Concertize(x, prudi) -> Appeal(x, prudi))\n\nAppeal(prudi, prudi)\n\nFacsimile(prudi, vasili) and Barefoot(vasili) and forall x (Facsimile(x, vasili) and Barefoot(vasili) -> Linear(x)) -> therefore Linear(prudi) Linear(prudi) and Barefoot(prudi) and forall x (Linear(x) and Barefoot(x) -> Appeal(x, prudi)) -> therefore Appeal(prudi, prudi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The juanita cake the tiffani. The juanita cake the cam. The juanita is palpatory. The juanita is beatable. The juanita is lite. The juanita valet the tiffani. The tiffani cake the cam. The tiffani bejewel the cam. The tiffani is not beatable. The tiffani does not visit the cam. The cam cake the juanita. The cam bejewel the juanita. The cam does not eat the tiffani. The cam is beatable. The cam valet the juanita. The cam valet the tiffani. If the tiffani bejewel the juanita then the tiffani cake the juanita. If something cake the juanita and the juanita valet the tiffani then the tiffani bejewel the juanita. If something is beatable and it does not eat the juanita then it is snuff. If something cake the juanita and the juanita is beatable then it is snuff. If something is snuff and beatable then it bejewel the cam. If something is beatable and it does not visit the cam then it bejewel the cam. The tiffani does not chase the juanita.", "logic": "\nCake(juanita, tiffani)\nCake(juanita, cam)\nPalpatory(juanita)\nBeatable(juanita)\nLite(juanita)\nValet(juanita, tiffani)\nCake(tiffani, cam)\nBejewel(tiffani, cam)\nnot Beatable(tiffani)\nnot Valet(tiffani, cam)\nCake(cam, juanita)\nBejewel(cam, juanita)\nnot Bejewel(cam, tiffani)\nBeatable(cam)\nValet(cam, juanita)\nValet(cam, tiffani)\nBejewel(tiffani, juanita) -> Cake(tiffani, juanita)\nforall x (Cake(x, juanita) and Valet(juanita, tiffani) -> Bejewel(tiffani, juanita))\nforall x (Beatable(x) and not Bejewel(x, juanita) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Cake(x, juanita) and Beatable(juanita) -> Snuff(x))\nforall x (Snuff(x) and Beatable(x) -> Bejewel(x, cam))\nforall x (Beatable(x) and not Valet(x, cam) -> Bejewel(x, cam))\n\nnot Cake(tiffani, juanita)\n\nCake(cam, juanita) and Valet(juanita, tiffani) and forall x (Cake(x, juanita) and Valet(juanita, tiffani) -> Bejewel(tiffani, juanita)) -> therefore Bejewel(tiffani, juanita) Bejewel(tiffani, juanita) and Bejewel(tiffani, juanita) -> Cake(tiffani, juanita) -> therefore Cake(tiffani, juanita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The warden flourish the flore. The warden flourish the lizabeth. The warden is shorthand. The warden is biogenic. The warden is threadbare. The warden cannulise the flore. The flore flourish the lizabeth. The flore encircle the lizabeth. The flore is not biogenic. The flore does not visit the lizabeth. The lizabeth flourish the warden. The lizabeth encircle the warden. The lizabeth does not eat the flore. The lizabeth is biogenic. The lizabeth cannulise the warden. The lizabeth cannulise the flore. If the flore encircle the warden then the flore flourish the warden. If something flourish the warden and the warden cannulise the flore then the flore encircle the warden. If something is biogenic and it does not eat the warden then it is beaten. If something flourish the warden and the warden is biogenic then it is beaten. If something is beaten and biogenic then it encircle the lizabeth. If something is biogenic and it does not visit the lizabeth then it encircle the lizabeth. The flore is beaten.", "logic": "\nFlourish(warden, flore)\nFlourish(warden, lizabeth)\nShorthand(warden)\nBiogenic(warden)\nThreadbare(warden)\nCannulise(warden, flore)\nFlourish(flore, lizabeth)\nEncircle(flore, lizabeth)\nnot Biogenic(flore)\nnot Cannulise(flore, lizabeth)\nFlourish(lizabeth, warden)\nEncircle(lizabeth, warden)\nnot Encircle(lizabeth, flore)\nBiogenic(lizabeth)\nCannulise(lizabeth, warden)\nCannulise(lizabeth, flore)\nEncircle(flore, warden) -> Flourish(flore, warden)\nforall x (Flourish(x, warden) and Cannulise(warden, flore) -> Encircle(flore, warden))\nforall x (Biogenic(x) and not Encircle(x, warden) -> Beaten(x))\nforall x (Flourish(x, warden) and Biogenic(warden) -> Beaten(x))\nforall x (Beaten(x) and Biogenic(x) -> Encircle(x, lizabeth))\nforall x (Biogenic(x) and not Cannulise(x, lizabeth) -> Encircle(x, lizabeth))\n\nBeaten(flore)\n\nFlourish(lizabeth, warden) and Cannulise(warden, flore) and forall x (Flourish(x, warden) and Cannulise(warden, flore) -> Encircle(flore, warden)) -> therefore Encircle(flore, warden) Encircle(flore, warden) and Encircle(flore, warden) -> Flourish(flore, warden) -> therefore Flourish(flore, warden) Flourish(flore, warden) and Biogenic(warden) and forall x (Flourish(x, warden) and Biogenic(warden) -> Beaten(x)) -> therefore Beaten(flore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The anja deceive the dyana. The anja deceive the genni. The anja is unreserved. The anja is daunted. The anja is minimized. The anja cyclostyle the dyana. The dyana deceive the genni. The dyana decouple the genni. The dyana is not daunted. The dyana does not visit the genni. The genni deceive the anja. The genni decouple the anja. The genni does not eat the dyana. The genni is daunted. The genni cyclostyle the anja. The genni cyclostyle the dyana. If the dyana decouple the anja then the dyana deceive the anja. If something deceive the anja and the anja cyclostyle the dyana then the dyana decouple the anja. If something is daunted and it does not eat the anja then it is scheduled. If something deceive the anja and the anja is daunted then it is scheduled. If something is scheduled and daunted then it decouple the genni. If something is daunted and it does not visit the genni then it decouple the genni. The dyana is not scheduled.", "logic": "\nDeceive(anja, dyana)\nDeceive(anja, genni)\nUnreserved(anja)\nDaunted(anja)\nMinimized(anja)\nCyclostyle(anja, dyana)\nDeceive(dyana, genni)\nDecouple(dyana, genni)\nnot Daunted(dyana)\nnot Cyclostyle(dyana, genni)\nDeceive(genni, anja)\nDecouple(genni, anja)\nnot Decouple(genni, dyana)\nDaunted(genni)\nCyclostyle(genni, anja)\nCyclostyle(genni, dyana)\nDecouple(dyana, anja) -> Deceive(dyana, anja)\nforall x (Deceive(x, anja) and Cyclostyle(anja, dyana) -> Decouple(dyana, anja))\nforall x (Daunted(x) and not Decouple(x, anja) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Deceive(x, anja) and Daunted(anja) -> Scheduled(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) and Daunted(x) -> Decouple(x, genni))\nforall x (Daunted(x) and not Cyclostyle(x, genni) -> Decouple(x, genni))\n\nnot Scheduled(dyana)\n\nDeceive(genni, anja) and Cyclostyle(anja, dyana) and forall x (Deceive(x, anja) and Cyclostyle(anja, dyana) -> Decouple(dyana, anja)) -> therefore Decouple(dyana, anja) Decouple(dyana, anja) and Decouple(dyana, anja) -> Deceive(dyana, anja) -> therefore Deceive(dyana, anja) Deceive(dyana, anja) and Daunted(anja) and forall x (Deceive(x, anja) and Daunted(anja) -> Scheduled(x)) -> therefore Scheduled(dyana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The emlynn pause the elli. The emlynn pause the kimberlyn. The emlynn is sentient. The emlynn is jolted. The emlynn is unwearied. The emlynn collate the elli. The elli pause the kimberlyn. The elli marvel the kimberlyn. The elli is not jolted. The elli does not visit the kimberlyn. The kimberlyn pause the emlynn. The kimberlyn marvel the emlynn. The kimberlyn does not eat the elli. The kimberlyn is jolted. The kimberlyn collate the emlynn. The kimberlyn collate the elli. If the elli marvel the emlynn then the elli pause the emlynn. If something pause the emlynn and the emlynn collate the elli then the elli marvel the emlynn. If something is jolted and it does not eat the emlynn then it is petallike. If something pause the emlynn and the emlynn is jolted then it is petallike. If something is petallike and jolted then it marvel the kimberlyn. If something is jolted and it does not visit the kimberlyn then it marvel the kimberlyn. The emlynn does not eat the kimberlyn.", "logic": "\nPause(emlynn, elli)\nPause(emlynn, kimberlyn)\nSentient(emlynn)\nJolted(emlynn)\nUnwearied(emlynn)\nCollate(emlynn, elli)\nPause(elli, kimberlyn)\nMarvel(elli, kimberlyn)\nnot Jolted(elli)\nnot Collate(elli, kimberlyn)\nPause(kimberlyn, emlynn)\nMarvel(kimberlyn, emlynn)\nnot Marvel(kimberlyn, elli)\nJolted(kimberlyn)\nCollate(kimberlyn, emlynn)\nCollate(kimberlyn, elli)\nMarvel(elli, emlynn) -> Pause(elli, emlynn)\nforall x (Pause(x, emlynn) and Collate(emlynn, elli) -> Marvel(elli, emlynn))\nforall x (Jolted(x) and not Marvel(x, emlynn) -> Petallike(x))\nforall x (Pause(x, emlynn) and Jolted(emlynn) -> Petallike(x))\nforall x (Petallike(x) and Jolted(x) -> Marvel(x, kimberlyn))\nforall x (Jolted(x) and not Collate(x, kimberlyn) -> Marvel(x, kimberlyn))\n\nnot Marvel(emlynn, kimberlyn)\n\nforall x (Petallike(x) and Jolted(x) -> Marvel(x, kimberlyn)) <- forall x (Jolted(x) and not Marvel(x, emlynn) -> Petallike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The elliot chaffer the krissie. The elliot chaffer the wiley. The elliot is semiliquid. The elliot is bipartisan. The elliot is theist. The elliot metal the krissie. The krissie chaffer the wiley. The krissie green the wiley. The krissie is not bipartisan. The krissie does not visit the wiley. The wiley chaffer the elliot. The wiley green the elliot. The wiley does not eat the krissie. The wiley is bipartisan. The wiley metal the elliot. The wiley metal the krissie. If the krissie green the elliot then the krissie chaffer the elliot. If something chaffer the elliot and the elliot metal the krissie then the krissie green the elliot. If something is bipartisan and it does not eat the elliot then it is celluloid. If something chaffer the elliot and the elliot is bipartisan then it is celluloid. If something is celluloid and bipartisan then it green the wiley. If something is bipartisan and it does not visit the wiley then it green the wiley. The elliot is celluloid.", "logic": "\nChaffer(elliot, krissie)\nChaffer(elliot, wiley)\nSemiliquid(elliot)\nBipartisan(elliot)\nTheist(elliot)\nMetal(elliot, krissie)\nChaffer(krissie, wiley)\nGreen(krissie, wiley)\nnot Bipartisan(krissie)\nnot Metal(krissie, wiley)\nChaffer(wiley, elliot)\nGreen(wiley, elliot)\nnot Green(wiley, krissie)\nBipartisan(wiley)\nMetal(wiley, elliot)\nMetal(wiley, krissie)\nGreen(krissie, elliot) -> Chaffer(krissie, elliot)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, elliot) and Metal(elliot, krissie) -> Green(krissie, elliot))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and not Green(x, elliot) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Chaffer(x, elliot) and Bipartisan(elliot) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Celluloid(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Green(x, wiley))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and not Metal(x, wiley) -> Green(x, wiley))\n\nCelluloid(elliot)\n\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and not Green(x, elliot) -> Celluloid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The guendolen commission the cindelyn. The guendolen commission the winston. The guendolen is sunk. The guendolen is erroneous. The guendolen is rayless. The guendolen snivel the cindelyn. The cindelyn commission the winston. The cindelyn stalinise the winston. The cindelyn is not erroneous. The cindelyn does not visit the winston. The winston commission the guendolen. The winston stalinise the guendolen. The winston does not eat the cindelyn. The winston is erroneous. The winston snivel the guendolen. The winston snivel the cindelyn. If the cindelyn stalinise the guendolen then the cindelyn commission the guendolen. If something commission the guendolen and the guendolen snivel the cindelyn then the cindelyn stalinise the guendolen. If something is erroneous and it does not eat the guendolen then it is unswept. If something commission the guendolen and the guendolen is erroneous then it is unswept. If something is unswept and erroneous then it stalinise the winston. If something is erroneous and it does not visit the winston then it stalinise the winston. The guendolen does not chase the guendolen.", "logic": "\nCommission(guendolen, cindelyn)\nCommission(guendolen, winston)\nSunk(guendolen)\nErroneous(guendolen)\nRayless(guendolen)\nSnivel(guendolen, cindelyn)\nCommission(cindelyn, winston)\nStalinise(cindelyn, winston)\nnot Erroneous(cindelyn)\nnot Snivel(cindelyn, winston)\nCommission(winston, guendolen)\nStalinise(winston, guendolen)\nnot Stalinise(winston, cindelyn)\nErroneous(winston)\nSnivel(winston, guendolen)\nSnivel(winston, cindelyn)\nStalinise(cindelyn, guendolen) -> Commission(cindelyn, guendolen)\nforall x (Commission(x, guendolen) and Snivel(guendolen, cindelyn) -> Stalinise(cindelyn, guendolen))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) and not Stalinise(x, guendolen) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Commission(x, guendolen) and Erroneous(guendolen) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Unswept(x) and Erroneous(x) -> Stalinise(x, winston))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) and not Snivel(x, winston) -> Stalinise(x, winston))\n\nnot Commission(guendolen, guendolen)\n\nnot Commission(guendolen, guendolen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The hildagard jawbone the ryann. The hildagard jawbone the susana. The hildagard is crusty. The hildagard is tubal. The hildagard is tiptoe. The hildagard titillate the ryann. The ryann jawbone the susana. The ryann infuriate the susana. The ryann is not tubal. The ryann does not visit the susana. The susana jawbone the hildagard. The susana infuriate the hildagard. The susana does not eat the ryann. The susana is tubal. The susana titillate the hildagard. The susana titillate the ryann. If the ryann infuriate the hildagard then the ryann jawbone the hildagard. If something jawbone the hildagard and the hildagard titillate the ryann then the ryann infuriate the hildagard. If something is tubal and it does not eat the hildagard then it is fluvial. If something jawbone the hildagard and the hildagard is tubal then it is fluvial. If something is fluvial and tubal then it infuriate the susana. If something is tubal and it does not visit the susana then it infuriate the susana. The ryann infuriate the ryann.", "logic": "\nJawbone(hildagard, ryann)\nJawbone(hildagard, susana)\nCrusty(hildagard)\nTubal(hildagard)\nTiptoe(hildagard)\nTitillate(hildagard, ryann)\nJawbone(ryann, susana)\nInfuriate(ryann, susana)\nnot Tubal(ryann)\nnot Titillate(ryann, susana)\nJawbone(susana, hildagard)\nInfuriate(susana, hildagard)\nnot Infuriate(susana, ryann)\nTubal(susana)\nTitillate(susana, hildagard)\nTitillate(susana, ryann)\nInfuriate(ryann, hildagard) -> Jawbone(ryann, hildagard)\nforall x (Jawbone(x, hildagard) and Titillate(hildagard, ryann) -> Infuriate(ryann, hildagard))\nforall x (Tubal(x) and not Infuriate(x, hildagard) -> Fluvial(x))\nforall x (Jawbone(x, hildagard) and Tubal(hildagard) -> Fluvial(x))\nforall x (Fluvial(x) and Tubal(x) -> Infuriate(x, susana))\nforall x (Tubal(x) and not Titillate(x, susana) -> Infuriate(x, susana))\n\nInfuriate(ryann, ryann)\n\nInfuriate(ryann, ryann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The clerissa binge the benita. The clerissa binge the alissa. The clerissa is sinkable. The clerissa is allogamous. The clerissa is configured. The clerissa temporise the benita. The benita binge the alissa. The benita overeat the alissa. The benita is not allogamous. The benita does not visit the alissa. The alissa binge the clerissa. The alissa overeat the clerissa. The alissa does not eat the benita. The alissa is allogamous. The alissa temporise the clerissa. The alissa temporise the benita. If the benita overeat the clerissa then the benita binge the clerissa. If something binge the clerissa and the clerissa temporise the benita then the benita overeat the clerissa. If something is allogamous and it does not eat the clerissa then it is woolen. If something binge the clerissa and the clerissa is allogamous then it is woolen. If something is woolen and allogamous then it overeat the alissa. If something is allogamous and it does not visit the alissa then it overeat the alissa. The benita does not chase the benita.", "logic": "\nBinge(clerissa, benita)\nBinge(clerissa, alissa)\nSinkable(clerissa)\nAllogamous(clerissa)\nConfigured(clerissa)\nTemporise(clerissa, benita)\nBinge(benita, alissa)\nOvereat(benita, alissa)\nnot Allogamous(benita)\nnot Temporise(benita, alissa)\nBinge(alissa, clerissa)\nOvereat(alissa, clerissa)\nnot Overeat(alissa, benita)\nAllogamous(alissa)\nTemporise(alissa, clerissa)\nTemporise(alissa, benita)\nOvereat(benita, clerissa) -> Binge(benita, clerissa)\nforall x (Binge(x, clerissa) and Temporise(clerissa, benita) -> Overeat(benita, clerissa))\nforall x (Allogamous(x) and not Overeat(x, clerissa) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Binge(x, clerissa) and Allogamous(clerissa) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Woolen(x) and Allogamous(x) -> Overeat(x, alissa))\nforall x (Allogamous(x) and not Temporise(x, alissa) -> Overeat(x, alissa))\n\nnot Binge(benita, benita)\n\nnot Binge(benita, benita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The lazaro bypass the elianora. The lazaro bypass the jeremiah. The lazaro is varied. The lazaro is quadruple. The lazaro is aerobiotic. The lazaro indent the elianora. The elianora bypass the jeremiah. The elianora quarry the jeremiah. The elianora is not quadruple. The elianora does not visit the jeremiah. The jeremiah bypass the lazaro. The jeremiah quarry the lazaro. The jeremiah does not eat the elianora. The jeremiah is quadruple. The jeremiah indent the lazaro. The jeremiah indent the elianora. If the elianora quarry the lazaro then the elianora bypass the lazaro. If something bypass the lazaro and the lazaro indent the elianora then the elianora quarry the lazaro. If something is quadruple and it does not eat the lazaro then it is acronymic. If something bypass the lazaro and the lazaro is quadruple then it is acronymic. If something is acronymic and quadruple then it quarry the jeremiah. If something is quadruple and it does not visit the jeremiah then it quarry the jeremiah. The jeremiah is varied.", "logic": "\nBypass(lazaro, elianora)\nBypass(lazaro, jeremiah)\nVaried(lazaro)\nQuadruple(lazaro)\nAerobiotic(lazaro)\nIndent(lazaro, elianora)\nBypass(elianora, jeremiah)\nQuarry(elianora, jeremiah)\nnot Quadruple(elianora)\nnot Indent(elianora, jeremiah)\nBypass(jeremiah, lazaro)\nQuarry(jeremiah, lazaro)\nnot Quarry(jeremiah, elianora)\nQuadruple(jeremiah)\nIndent(jeremiah, lazaro)\nIndent(jeremiah, elianora)\nQuarry(elianora, lazaro) -> Bypass(elianora, lazaro)\nforall x (Bypass(x, lazaro) and Indent(lazaro, elianora) -> Quarry(elianora, lazaro))\nforall x (Quadruple(x) and not Quarry(x, lazaro) -> Acronymic(x))\nforall x (Bypass(x, lazaro) and Quadruple(lazaro) -> Acronymic(x))\nforall x (Acronymic(x) and Quadruple(x) -> Quarry(x, jeremiah))\nforall x (Quadruple(x) and not Indent(x, jeremiah) -> Quarry(x, jeremiah))\n\nVaried(jeremiah)\n\nVaried(jeremiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The alden chant the shawn. The alden chant the gaven. The alden is tannish. The alden is monopteral. The alden is credible. The alden reminisce the shawn. The shawn chant the gaven. The shawn patter the gaven. The shawn is not monopteral. The shawn does not visit the gaven. The gaven chant the alden. The gaven patter the alden. The gaven does not eat the shawn. The gaven is monopteral. The gaven reminisce the alden. The gaven reminisce the shawn. If the shawn patter the alden then the shawn chant the alden. If something chant the alden and the alden reminisce the shawn then the shawn patter the alden. If something is monopteral and it does not eat the alden then it is zoftig. If something chant the alden and the alden is monopteral then it is zoftig. If something is zoftig and monopteral then it patter the gaven. If something is monopteral and it does not visit the gaven then it patter the gaven. The gaven does not chase the gaven.", "logic": "\nChant(alden, shawn)\nChant(alden, gaven)\nTannish(alden)\nMonopteral(alden)\nCredible(alden)\nReminisce(alden, shawn)\nChant(shawn, gaven)\nPatter(shawn, gaven)\nnot Monopteral(shawn)\nnot Reminisce(shawn, gaven)\nChant(gaven, alden)\nPatter(gaven, alden)\nnot Patter(gaven, shawn)\nMonopteral(gaven)\nReminisce(gaven, alden)\nReminisce(gaven, shawn)\nPatter(shawn, alden) -> Chant(shawn, alden)\nforall x (Chant(x, alden) and Reminisce(alden, shawn) -> Patter(shawn, alden))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and not Patter(x, alden) -> Zoftig(x))\nforall x (Chant(x, alden) and Monopteral(alden) -> Zoftig(x))\nforall x (Zoftig(x) and Monopteral(x) -> Patter(x, gaven))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and not Reminisce(x, gaven) -> Patter(x, gaven))\n\nnot Chant(gaven, gaven)\n\nnot Chant(gaven, gaven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The kyle flounder the carin. The kyle flounder the rozele. The kyle is burmese. The kyle is astounded. The kyle is fugly. The kyle slobber the carin. The carin flounder the rozele. The carin huddle the rozele. The carin is not astounded. The carin does not visit the rozele. The rozele flounder the kyle. The rozele huddle the kyle. The rozele does not eat the carin. The rozele is astounded. The rozele slobber the kyle. The rozele slobber the carin. If the carin huddle the kyle then the carin flounder the kyle. If something flounder the kyle and the kyle slobber the carin then the carin huddle the kyle. If something is astounded and it does not eat the kyle then it is symbiotic. If something flounder the kyle and the kyle is astounded then it is symbiotic. If something is symbiotic and astounded then it huddle the rozele. If something is astounded and it does not visit the rozele then it huddle the rozele. The carin is kind.", "logic": "\nFlounder(kyle, carin)\nFlounder(kyle, rozele)\nBurmese(kyle)\nAstounded(kyle)\nFugly(kyle)\nSlobber(kyle, carin)\nFlounder(carin, rozele)\nHuddle(carin, rozele)\nnot Astounded(carin)\nnot Slobber(carin, rozele)\nFlounder(rozele, kyle)\nHuddle(rozele, kyle)\nnot Huddle(rozele, carin)\nAstounded(rozele)\nSlobber(rozele, kyle)\nSlobber(rozele, carin)\nHuddle(carin, kyle) -> Flounder(carin, kyle)\nforall x (Flounder(x, kyle) and Slobber(kyle, carin) -> Huddle(carin, kyle))\nforall x (Astounded(x) and not Huddle(x, kyle) -> Symbiotic(x))\nforall x (Flounder(x, kyle) and Astounded(kyle) -> Symbiotic(x))\nforall x (Symbiotic(x) and Astounded(x) -> Huddle(x, rozele))\nforall x (Astounded(x) and not Slobber(x, rozele) -> Huddle(x, rozele))\n\nKind(carin)\n\nKind(carin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1363"} {"premises": "The tony dispute the jared. The tony is choric. The tony thread the gusti. The tony restock the jared. The gusti is choric. The gusti restock the jared. The jared does not eat the gusti. The jared is not smallish. The jared thread the tony. The jared does not need the tony. If someone thread the gusti then the gusti dispute the tony. If the jared restock the tony and the tony dispute the gusti then the jared does not like the gusti. The jared does not need the tony.", "logic": "\nDispute(tony, jared)\nChoric(tony)\nThread(tony, gusti)\nRestock(tony, jared)\nChoric(gusti)\nRestock(gusti, jared)\nnot Dispute(jared, gusti)\nnot Smallish(jared)\nThread(jared, tony)\nnot Restock(jared, tony)\nforall x (Thread(x, gusti) -> Dispute(gusti, tony))\nRestock(jared, tony) and Dispute(tony, gusti) -> not Thread(jared, gusti)\n\nnot Restock(jared, tony)\n\ntherefore not Restock(jared, tony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The emilia smock the willey. The emilia is volant. The emilia cheerlead the ari. The emilia reshuffle the willey. The ari is volant. The ari reshuffle the willey. The willey does not eat the ari. The willey is not northerly. The willey cheerlead the emilia. The willey does not need the emilia. If someone cheerlead the ari then the ari smock the emilia. If the willey reshuffle the emilia and the emilia smock the ari then the willey does not like the ari. The willey is northerly.", "logic": "\nSmock(emilia, willey)\nVolant(emilia)\nCheerlead(emilia, ari)\nReshuffle(emilia, willey)\nVolant(ari)\nReshuffle(ari, willey)\nnot Smock(willey, ari)\nnot Northerly(willey)\nCheerlead(willey, emilia)\nnot Reshuffle(willey, emilia)\nforall x (Cheerlead(x, ari) -> Smock(ari, emilia))\nReshuffle(willey, emilia) and Smock(emilia, ari) -> not Cheerlead(willey, ari)\n\nNortherly(willey)\n\ntherefore not Northerly(willey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The amalita allude the randolph. The amalita is ovine. The amalita conduct the dorey. The amalita overstate the randolph. The dorey is ovine. The dorey overstate the randolph. The randolph does not eat the dorey. The randolph is not nonmusical. The randolph conduct the amalita. The randolph does not need the amalita. If someone conduct the dorey then the dorey allude the amalita. If the randolph overstate the amalita and the amalita allude the dorey then the randolph does not like the dorey. The dorey allude the amalita.", "logic": "\nAllude(amalita, randolph)\nOvine(amalita)\nConduct(amalita, dorey)\nOverstate(amalita, randolph)\nOvine(dorey)\nOverstate(dorey, randolph)\nnot Allude(randolph, dorey)\nnot Nonmusical(randolph)\nConduct(randolph, amalita)\nnot Overstate(randolph, amalita)\nforall x (Conduct(x, dorey) -> Allude(dorey, amalita))\nOverstate(randolph, amalita) and Allude(amalita, dorey) -> not Conduct(randolph, dorey)\n\nAllude(dorey, amalita)\n\nConduct(amalita, dorey) and forall x (Conduct(x, dorey) -> Allude(dorey, amalita)) -> therefore Allude(dorey, amalita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The trace ameliorate the mugsy. The trace is untypical. The trace waylay the cassandre. The trace lollop the mugsy. The cassandre is untypical. The cassandre lollop the mugsy. The mugsy does not eat the cassandre. The mugsy is not battered. The mugsy waylay the trace. The mugsy does not need the trace. If someone waylay the cassandre then the cassandre ameliorate the trace. If the mugsy lollop the trace and the trace ameliorate the cassandre then the mugsy does not like the cassandre. The cassandre does not eat the trace.", "logic": "\nAmeliorate(trace, mugsy)\nUntypical(trace)\nWaylay(trace, cassandre)\nLollop(trace, mugsy)\nUntypical(cassandre)\nLollop(cassandre, mugsy)\nnot Ameliorate(mugsy, cassandre)\nnot Battered(mugsy)\nWaylay(mugsy, trace)\nnot Lollop(mugsy, trace)\nforall x (Waylay(x, cassandre) -> Ameliorate(cassandre, trace))\nLollop(mugsy, trace) and Ameliorate(trace, cassandre) -> not Waylay(mugsy, cassandre)\n\nnot Ameliorate(cassandre, trace)\n\nWaylay(trace, cassandre) and forall x (Waylay(x, cassandre) -> Ameliorate(cassandre, trace)) -> therefore Ameliorate(cassandre, trace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The monah oxidize the lenette. The monah is thready. The monah kibosh the rhetta. The monah slag the lenette. The rhetta is thready. The rhetta slag the lenette. The lenette does not eat the rhetta. The lenette is not russian. The lenette kibosh the monah. The lenette does not need the monah. If someone kibosh the rhetta then the rhetta oxidize the monah. If the lenette slag the monah and the monah oxidize the rhetta then the lenette does not like the rhetta. The lenette does not need the lenette.", "logic": "\nOxidize(monah, lenette)\nThready(monah)\nKibosh(monah, rhetta)\nSlag(monah, lenette)\nThready(rhetta)\nSlag(rhetta, lenette)\nnot Oxidize(lenette, rhetta)\nnot Russian(lenette)\nKibosh(lenette, monah)\nnot Slag(lenette, monah)\nforall x (Kibosh(x, rhetta) -> Oxidize(rhetta, monah))\nSlag(lenette, monah) and Oxidize(monah, rhetta) -> not Kibosh(lenette, rhetta)\n\nnot Slag(lenette, lenette)\n\nnot Slag(lenette, lenette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The cathy abscise the bearnard. The cathy is saccadic. The cathy dissatisfy the augustina. The cathy miniate the bearnard. The augustina is saccadic. The augustina miniate the bearnard. The bearnard does not eat the augustina. The bearnard is not periwigged. The bearnard dissatisfy the cathy. The bearnard does not need the cathy. If someone dissatisfy the augustina then the augustina abscise the cathy. If the bearnard miniate the cathy and the cathy abscise the augustina then the bearnard does not like the augustina. The augustina is periwigged.", "logic": "\nAbscise(cathy, bearnard)\nSaccadic(cathy)\nDissatisfy(cathy, augustina)\nMiniate(cathy, bearnard)\nSaccadic(augustina)\nMiniate(augustina, bearnard)\nnot Abscise(bearnard, augustina)\nnot Periwigged(bearnard)\nDissatisfy(bearnard, cathy)\nnot Miniate(bearnard, cathy)\nforall x (Dissatisfy(x, augustina) -> Abscise(augustina, cathy))\nMiniate(bearnard, cathy) and Abscise(cathy, augustina) -> not Dissatisfy(bearnard, augustina)\n\nPeriwigged(augustina)\n\nPeriwigged(augustina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The leonerd rethink the marla. The leonerd is protected. The leonerd forget the valry. The leonerd dimension the marla. The valry is protected. The valry dimension the marla. The marla does not eat the valry. The marla is not hammered. The marla forget the leonerd. The marla does not need the leonerd. If someone forget the valry then the valry rethink the leonerd. If the marla dimension the leonerd and the leonerd rethink the valry then the marla does not like the valry. The valry is not young.", "logic": "\nRethink(leonerd, marla)\nProtected(leonerd)\nForget(leonerd, valry)\nDimension(leonerd, marla)\nProtected(valry)\nDimension(valry, marla)\nnot Rethink(marla, valry)\nnot Hammered(marla)\nForget(marla, leonerd)\nnot Dimension(marla, leonerd)\nforall x (Forget(x, valry) -> Rethink(valry, leonerd))\nDimension(marla, leonerd) and Rethink(leonerd, valry) -> not Forget(marla, valry)\n\nnot Young(valry)\n\nnot Young(valry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The elsey puke the haven. The elsey is rampant. The elsey cultivate the valaree. The elsey bucket the haven. The valaree is rampant. The valaree bucket the haven. The haven does not eat the valaree. The haven is not sisyphean. The haven cultivate the elsey. The haven does not need the elsey. If someone cultivate the valaree then the valaree puke the elsey. If the haven bucket the elsey and the elsey puke the valaree then the haven does not like the valaree. The valaree puke the haven.", "logic": "\nPuke(elsey, haven)\nRampant(elsey)\nCultivate(elsey, valaree)\nBucket(elsey, haven)\nRampant(valaree)\nBucket(valaree, haven)\nnot Puke(haven, valaree)\nnot Sisyphean(haven)\nCultivate(haven, elsey)\nnot Bucket(haven, elsey)\nforall x (Cultivate(x, valaree) -> Puke(valaree, elsey))\nBucket(haven, elsey) and Puke(elsey, valaree) -> not Cultivate(haven, valaree)\n\nPuke(valaree, haven)\n\nPuke(valaree, haven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2712"} {"premises": "The leroy is entrancing. The leroy is siouan. The leroy is storied. If someone is mucinoid then they are storied. Red people are storied. Cold, mucinoid people are storied. Red people are storied. Red, cognisable people are storied. Nice people are not cognisable. All storied, siouan people are mucinoid. Nice people are siouan. The leroy is siouan.", "logic": "\nEntrancing(leroy)\nSiouan(leroy)\nStoried(leroy)\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) and Mucinoid(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) and Cognisable(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> not Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Storied(x) and Siouan(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Siouan(x))\n\nSiouan(leroy)\n\ntherefore Siouan(leroy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The thain is metallic. The thain is unveiled. The thain is apophatic. If someone is posh then they are apophatic. Red people are apophatic. Cold, posh people are apophatic. Red people are apophatic. Red, unready people are apophatic. Nice people are not unready. All apophatic, unveiled people are posh. Nice people are unveiled. The thain is not apophatic.", "logic": "\nMetallic(thain)\nUnveiled(thain)\nApophatic(thain)\nforall x (Posh(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Metallic(x) and Posh(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) and Unready(x) -> Apophatic(x))\nforall x (Posh(x) -> not Unready(x))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) and Unveiled(x) -> Posh(x))\nforall x (Posh(x) -> Unveiled(x))\n\nnot Apophatic(thain)\n\ntherefore Apophatic(thain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The philippe is impartial. The philippe is subocean. The philippe is distorted. If someone is niffy then they are distorted. Red people are distorted. Cold, niffy people are distorted. Red people are distorted. Red, gradatory people are distorted. Nice people are not gradatory. All distorted, subocean people are niffy. Nice people are subocean. The philippe is niffy.", "logic": "\nImpartial(philippe)\nSubocean(philippe)\nDistorted(philippe)\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Subocean(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Impartial(x) and Niffy(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Subocean(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Subocean(x) and Gradatory(x) -> Distorted(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> not Gradatory(x))\nforall x (Distorted(x) and Subocean(x) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> Subocean(x))\n\nNiffy(philippe)\n\nDistorted(philippe) and Subocean(philippe) and forall x (Distorted(x) and Subocean(x) -> Niffy(x)) -> therefore Niffy(philippe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The ralf is parochial. The ralf is inflamed. The ralf is vapourised. If someone is harsh then they are vapourised. Red people are vapourised. Cold, harsh people are vapourised. Red people are vapourised. Red, touching people are vapourised. Nice people are not touching. All vapourised, inflamed people are harsh. Nice people are inflamed. The ralf is not harsh.", "logic": "\nParochial(ralf)\nInflamed(ralf)\nVapourised(ralf)\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Inflamed(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Parochial(x) and Harsh(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Inflamed(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Inflamed(x) and Touching(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> not Touching(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Inflamed(x) -> Harsh(x))\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Inflamed(x))\n\nnot Harsh(ralf)\n\nVapourised(ralf) and Inflamed(ralf) and forall x (Vapourised(x) and Inflamed(x) -> Harsh(x)) -> therefore Harsh(ralf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The lori is diabatic. The lori is sparing. The lori is feathery. If someone is uncritical then they are feathery. Red people are feathery. Cold, uncritical people are feathery. Red people are feathery. Red, gallican people are feathery. Nice people are not gallican. All feathery, sparing people are uncritical. Nice people are sparing. The lori is not gallican.", "logic": "\nDiabatic(lori)\nSparing(lori)\nFeathery(lori)\nforall x (Uncritical(x) -> Feathery(x))\nforall x (Sparing(x) -> Feathery(x))\nforall x (Diabatic(x) and Uncritical(x) -> Feathery(x))\nforall x (Sparing(x) -> Feathery(x))\nforall x (Sparing(x) and Gallican(x) -> Feathery(x))\nforall x (Uncritical(x) -> not Gallican(x))\nforall x (Feathery(x) and Sparing(x) -> Uncritical(x))\nforall x (Uncritical(x) -> Sparing(x))\n\nnot Gallican(lori)\n\nFeathery(lori) and Sparing(lori) and forall x (Feathery(x) and Sparing(x) -> Uncritical(x)) -> therefore Uncritical(lori) Uncritical(lori) and forall x (Uncritical(x) -> not Gallican(x)) -> therefore not Gallican(lori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The alisha is rear. The alisha is adenoidal. The alisha is stoned. If someone is tattling then they are stoned. Red people are stoned. Cold, tattling people are stoned. Red people are stoned. Red, appalling people are stoned. Nice people are not appalling. All stoned, adenoidal people are tattling. Nice people are adenoidal. The alisha is appalling.", "logic": "\nRear(alisha)\nAdenoidal(alisha)\nStoned(alisha)\nforall x (Tattling(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Rear(x) and Tattling(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) and Appalling(x) -> Stoned(x))\nforall x (Tattling(x) -> not Appalling(x))\nforall x (Stoned(x) and Adenoidal(x) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Tattling(x) -> Adenoidal(x))\n\nAppalling(alisha)\n\nStoned(alisha) and Adenoidal(alisha) and forall x (Stoned(x) and Adenoidal(x) -> Tattling(x)) -> therefore Tattling(alisha) Tattling(alisha) and forall x (Tattling(x) -> not Appalling(x)) -> therefore not Appalling(alisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The fanechka is starlit. The fanechka is trackless. The fanechka is scrappy. If someone is aerophilic then they are scrappy. Red people are scrappy. Cold, aerophilic people are scrappy. Red people are scrappy. Red, ossicular people are scrappy. Nice people are not ossicular. All scrappy, trackless people are aerophilic. Nice people are trackless. The fanechka does not need the fanechka.", "logic": "\nStarlit(fanechka)\nTrackless(fanechka)\nScrappy(fanechka)\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Scrappy(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) -> Scrappy(x))\nforall x (Starlit(x) and Aerophilic(x) -> Scrappy(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) -> Scrappy(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) and Ossicular(x) -> Scrappy(x))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> not Ossicular(x))\nforall x (Scrappy(x) and Trackless(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Trackless(x))\n\nnot Needs(fanechka, fanechka)\n\nnot Needs(fanechka, fanechka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The kitty is affine. The kitty is luculent. The kitty is colourless. If someone is darkish then they are colourless. Red people are colourless. Cold, darkish people are colourless. Red people are colourless. Red, umpteen people are colourless. Nice people are not umpteen. All colourless, luculent people are darkish. Nice people are luculent. The kitty likes the kitty.", "logic": "\nAffine(kitty)\nLuculent(kitty)\nColourless(kitty)\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Luculent(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Affine(x) and Darkish(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Luculent(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Luculent(x) and Umpteen(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> not Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) and Luculent(x) -> Darkish(x))\nforall x (Darkish(x) -> Luculent(x))\n\nLikes(kitty, kitty)\n\nLikes(kitty, kitty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2026"} {"premises": "The sherry move the duffy. The sherry is brutal. The sherry is disabled. The sherry is drastic. The sherry is sixteen. The sherry discipline the duffy. The sherry paste the duffy. The duffy move the sherry. The duffy is brutal. The duffy is disabled. The duffy is sixteen. The duffy paste the sherry. If someone paste the sherry and they eat the sherry then the sherry is normative. If someone move the duffy and the duffy is sixteen then the duffy paste the sherry. If the sherry is normative and the sherry is sixteen then the sherry paste the duffy. If someone is normative then they eat the duffy. If someone paste the duffy and the duffy is drastic then they like the duffy. If someone move the duffy and the duffy is brutal then they eat the sherry. If someone is normative then they are brutal. If someone is normative and they like the duffy then the duffy is normative. The sherry is brutal.", "logic": "\nMove(sherry, duffy)\nBrutal(sherry)\nDisabled(sherry)\nDrastic(sherry)\nSixteen(sherry)\nDiscipline(sherry, duffy)\nPaste(sherry, duffy)\nMove(duffy, sherry)\nBrutal(duffy)\nDisabled(duffy)\nSixteen(duffy)\nPaste(duffy, sherry)\nforall x (Paste(x, sherry) and Move(x, sherry) -> Normative(sherry))\nforall x (Move(x, duffy) and Sixteen(duffy) -> Paste(duffy, sherry))\nNormative(sherry) and Sixteen(sherry) -> Paste(sherry, duffy)\nforall x (Normative(x) -> Move(x, duffy))\nforall x (Paste(x, duffy) and Drastic(duffy) -> Discipline(x, duffy))\nforall x (Move(x, duffy) and Brutal(duffy) -> Move(x, sherry))\nforall x (Normative(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Normative(x) and Discipline(x, duffy) -> Normative(duffy))\n\nBrutal(sherry)\n\ntherefore Brutal(sherry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The xenos rephrase the viole. The xenos is detachable. The xenos is blustering. The xenos is winless. The xenos is esthetic. The xenos golf the viole. The xenos brattice the viole. The viole rephrase the xenos. The viole is detachable. The viole is blustering. The viole is esthetic. The viole brattice the xenos. If someone brattice the xenos and they eat the xenos then the xenos is burry. If someone rephrase the viole and the viole is esthetic then the viole brattice the xenos. If the xenos is burry and the xenos is esthetic then the xenos brattice the viole. If someone is burry then they eat the viole. If someone brattice the viole and the viole is winless then they like the viole. If someone rephrase the viole and the viole is detachable then they eat the xenos. If someone is burry then they are detachable. If someone is burry and they like the viole then the viole is burry. The xenos does not like the viole.", "logic": "\nRephrase(xenos, viole)\nDetachable(xenos)\nBlustering(xenos)\nWinless(xenos)\nEsthetic(xenos)\nGolf(xenos, viole)\nBrattice(xenos, viole)\nRephrase(viole, xenos)\nDetachable(viole)\nBlustering(viole)\nEsthetic(viole)\nBrattice(viole, xenos)\nforall x (Brattice(x, xenos) and Rephrase(x, xenos) -> Burry(xenos))\nforall x (Rephrase(x, viole) and Esthetic(viole) -> Brattice(viole, xenos))\nBurry(xenos) and Esthetic(xenos) -> Brattice(xenos, viole)\nforall x (Burry(x) -> Rephrase(x, viole))\nforall x (Brattice(x, viole) and Winless(viole) -> Golf(x, viole))\nforall x (Rephrase(x, viole) and Detachable(viole) -> Rephrase(x, xenos))\nforall x (Burry(x) -> Detachable(x))\nforall x (Burry(x) and Golf(x, viole) -> Burry(viole))\n\nnot Golf(xenos, viole)\n\ntherefore Golf(xenos, viole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The earl compose the madelin. The earl is contorted. The earl is octagonal. The earl is scalloped. The earl is immense. The earl blackjack the madelin. The earl reconvene the madelin. The madelin compose the earl. The madelin is contorted. The madelin is octagonal. The madelin is immense. The madelin reconvene the earl. If someone reconvene the earl and they eat the earl then the earl is suppliant. If someone compose the madelin and the madelin is immense then the madelin reconvene the earl. If the earl is suppliant and the earl is immense then the earl reconvene the madelin. If someone is suppliant then they eat the madelin. If someone reconvene the madelin and the madelin is scalloped then they like the madelin. If someone compose the madelin and the madelin is contorted then they eat the earl. If someone is suppliant then they are contorted. If someone is suppliant and they like the madelin then the madelin is suppliant. The earl compose the earl.", "logic": "\nCompose(earl, madelin)\nContorted(earl)\nOctagonal(earl)\nScalloped(earl)\nImmense(earl)\nBlackjack(earl, madelin)\nReconvene(earl, madelin)\nCompose(madelin, earl)\nContorted(madelin)\nOctagonal(madelin)\nImmense(madelin)\nReconvene(madelin, earl)\nforall x (Reconvene(x, earl) and Compose(x, earl) -> Suppliant(earl))\nforall x (Compose(x, madelin) and Immense(madelin) -> Reconvene(madelin, earl))\nSuppliant(earl) and Immense(earl) -> Reconvene(earl, madelin)\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Compose(x, madelin))\nforall x (Reconvene(x, madelin) and Scalloped(madelin) -> Blackjack(x, madelin))\nforall x (Compose(x, madelin) and Contorted(madelin) -> Compose(x, earl))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) and Blackjack(x, madelin) -> Suppliant(madelin))\n\nCompose(earl, earl)\n\nCompose(earl, madelin) and Contorted(madelin) and forall x (Compose(x, madelin) and Contorted(madelin) -> Compose(x, earl)) -> therefore Compose(earl, earl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The nyssa premier the arron. The nyssa is enatic. The nyssa is draining. The nyssa is stabbing. The nyssa is ecstatic. The nyssa coerce the arron. The nyssa staff the arron. The arron premier the nyssa. The arron is enatic. The arron is draining. The arron is ecstatic. The arron staff the nyssa. If someone staff the nyssa and they eat the nyssa then the nyssa is beardless. If someone premier the arron and the arron is ecstatic then the arron staff the nyssa. If the nyssa is beardless and the nyssa is ecstatic then the nyssa staff the arron. If someone is beardless then they eat the arron. If someone staff the arron and the arron is stabbing then they like the arron. If someone premier the arron and the arron is enatic then they eat the nyssa. If someone is beardless then they are enatic. If someone is beardless and they like the arron then the arron is beardless. The nyssa is not beardless.", "logic": "\nPremier(nyssa, arron)\nEnatic(nyssa)\nDraining(nyssa)\nStabbing(nyssa)\nEcstatic(nyssa)\nCoerce(nyssa, arron)\nStaff(nyssa, arron)\nPremier(arron, nyssa)\nEnatic(arron)\nDraining(arron)\nEcstatic(arron)\nStaff(arron, nyssa)\nforall x (Staff(x, nyssa) and Premier(x, nyssa) -> Beardless(nyssa))\nforall x (Premier(x, arron) and Ecstatic(arron) -> Staff(arron, nyssa))\nBeardless(nyssa) and Ecstatic(nyssa) -> Staff(nyssa, arron)\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Premier(x, arron))\nforall x (Staff(x, arron) and Stabbing(arron) -> Coerce(x, arron))\nforall x (Premier(x, arron) and Enatic(arron) -> Premier(x, nyssa))\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Enatic(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) and Coerce(x, arron) -> Beardless(arron))\n\nnot Beardless(nyssa)\n\nStaff(arron, nyssa) and Premier(arron, nyssa) and forall x (Staff(x, nyssa) and Premier(x, nyssa) -> Beardless(nyssa)) -> therefore Beardless(nyssa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The tedra patent the davidde. The tedra is ionian. The tedra is cloisonne. The tedra is missional. The tedra is clad. The tedra annunciate the davidde. The tedra camp the davidde. The davidde patent the tedra. The davidde is ionian. The davidde is cloisonne. The davidde is clad. The davidde camp the tedra. If someone camp the tedra and they eat the tedra then the tedra is dioecian. If someone patent the davidde and the davidde is clad then the davidde camp the tedra. If the tedra is dioecian and the tedra is clad then the tedra camp the davidde. If someone is dioecian then they eat the davidde. If someone camp the davidde and the davidde is missional then they like the davidde. If someone patent the davidde and the davidde is ionian then they eat the tedra. If someone is dioecian then they are ionian. If someone is dioecian and they like the davidde then the davidde is dioecian. The davidde is dioecian.", "logic": "\nPatent(tedra, davidde)\nIonian(tedra)\nCloisonne(tedra)\nMissional(tedra)\nClad(tedra)\nAnnunciate(tedra, davidde)\nCamp(tedra, davidde)\nPatent(davidde, tedra)\nIonian(davidde)\nCloisonne(davidde)\nClad(davidde)\nCamp(davidde, tedra)\nforall x (Camp(x, tedra) and Patent(x, tedra) -> Dioecian(tedra))\nforall x (Patent(x, davidde) and Clad(davidde) -> Camp(davidde, tedra))\nDioecian(tedra) and Clad(tedra) -> Camp(tedra, davidde)\nforall x (Dioecian(x) -> Patent(x, davidde))\nforall x (Camp(x, davidde) and Missional(davidde) -> Annunciate(x, davidde))\nforall x (Patent(x, davidde) and Ionian(davidde) -> Patent(x, tedra))\nforall x (Dioecian(x) -> Ionian(x))\nforall x (Dioecian(x) and Annunciate(x, davidde) -> Dioecian(davidde))\n\nDioecian(davidde)\n\nCamp(davidde, tedra) and Patent(davidde, tedra) and forall x (Camp(x, tedra) and Patent(x, tedra) -> Dioecian(tedra)) -> therefore Dioecian(tedra) Dioecian(tedra) and Annunciate(tedra, davidde) and forall x (Dioecian(x) and Annunciate(x, davidde) -> Dioecian(davidde)) -> therefore Dioecian(davidde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The guthry undercut the gavra. The guthry is pocked. The guthry is lossless. The guthry is brachiate. The guthry is fried. The guthry reproduce the gavra. The guthry drink the gavra. The gavra undercut the guthry. The gavra is pocked. The gavra is lossless. The gavra is fried. The gavra drink the guthry. If someone drink the guthry and they eat the guthry then the guthry is beautiful. If someone undercut the gavra and the gavra is fried then the gavra drink the guthry. If the guthry is beautiful and the guthry is fried then the guthry drink the gavra. If someone is beautiful then they eat the gavra. If someone drink the gavra and the gavra is brachiate then they like the gavra. If someone undercut the gavra and the gavra is pocked then they eat the guthry. If someone is beautiful then they are pocked. If someone is beautiful and they like the gavra then the gavra is beautiful. The gavra is not beautiful.", "logic": "\nUndercut(guthry, gavra)\nPocked(guthry)\nLossless(guthry)\nBrachiate(guthry)\nFried(guthry)\nReproduce(guthry, gavra)\nDrink(guthry, gavra)\nUndercut(gavra, guthry)\nPocked(gavra)\nLossless(gavra)\nFried(gavra)\nDrink(gavra, guthry)\nforall x (Drink(x, guthry) and Undercut(x, guthry) -> Beautiful(guthry))\nforall x (Undercut(x, gavra) and Fried(gavra) -> Drink(gavra, guthry))\nBeautiful(guthry) and Fried(guthry) -> Drink(guthry, gavra)\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Undercut(x, gavra))\nforall x (Drink(x, gavra) and Brachiate(gavra) -> Reproduce(x, gavra))\nforall x (Undercut(x, gavra) and Pocked(gavra) -> Undercut(x, guthry))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Pocked(x))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) and Reproduce(x, gavra) -> Beautiful(gavra))\n\nnot Beautiful(gavra)\n\nDrink(gavra, guthry) and Undercut(gavra, guthry) and forall x (Drink(x, guthry) and Undercut(x, guthry) -> Beautiful(guthry)) -> therefore Beautiful(guthry) Beautiful(guthry) and Reproduce(guthry, gavra) and forall x (Beautiful(x) and Reproduce(x, gavra) -> Beautiful(gavra)) -> therefore Beautiful(gavra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The yardley wedge the ede. The yardley is entangled. The yardley is unhygienic. The yardley is unleavened. The yardley is seeable. The yardley pacify the ede. The yardley coeducate the ede. The ede wedge the yardley. The ede is entangled. The ede is unhygienic. The ede is seeable. The ede coeducate the yardley. If someone coeducate the yardley and they eat the yardley then the yardley is saxatile. If someone wedge the ede and the ede is seeable then the ede coeducate the yardley. If the yardley is saxatile and the yardley is seeable then the yardley coeducate the ede. If someone is saxatile then they eat the ede. If someone coeducate the ede and the ede is unleavened then they like the ede. If someone wedge the ede and the ede is entangled then they eat the yardley. If someone is saxatile then they are entangled. If someone is saxatile and they like the ede then the ede is saxatile. The ede wedge the ede.", "logic": "\nWedge(yardley, ede)\nEntangled(yardley)\nUnhygienic(yardley)\nUnleavened(yardley)\nSeeable(yardley)\nPacify(yardley, ede)\nCoeducate(yardley, ede)\nWedge(ede, yardley)\nEntangled(ede)\nUnhygienic(ede)\nSeeable(ede)\nCoeducate(ede, yardley)\nforall x (Coeducate(x, yardley) and Wedge(x, yardley) -> Saxatile(yardley))\nforall x (Wedge(x, ede) and Seeable(ede) -> Coeducate(ede, yardley))\nSaxatile(yardley) and Seeable(yardley) -> Coeducate(yardley, ede)\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Wedge(x, ede))\nforall x (Coeducate(x, ede) and Unleavened(ede) -> Pacify(x, ede))\nforall x (Wedge(x, ede) and Entangled(ede) -> Wedge(x, yardley))\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Entangled(x))\nforall x (Saxatile(x) and Pacify(x, ede) -> Saxatile(ede))\n\nWedge(ede, ede)\n\nCoeducate(ede, yardley) and Wedge(ede, yardley) and forall x (Coeducate(x, yardley) and Wedge(x, yardley) -> Saxatile(yardley)) -> therefore Saxatile(yardley) Saxatile(yardley) and Pacify(yardley, ede) and forall x (Saxatile(x) and Pacify(x, ede) -> Saxatile(ede)) -> therefore Saxatile(ede) Saxatile(ede) and forall x (Saxatile(x) -> Wedge(x, ede)) -> therefore Wedge(ede, ede)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The ignatius pollenate the thibaut. The ignatius is sorrowing. The ignatius is influent. The ignatius is immaculate. The ignatius is capitulary. The ignatius uncloak the thibaut. The ignatius smother the thibaut. The thibaut pollenate the ignatius. The thibaut is sorrowing. The thibaut is influent. The thibaut is capitulary. The thibaut smother the ignatius. If someone smother the ignatius and they eat the ignatius then the ignatius is mongolian. If someone pollenate the thibaut and the thibaut is capitulary then the thibaut smother the ignatius. If the ignatius is mongolian and the ignatius is capitulary then the ignatius smother the thibaut. If someone is mongolian then they eat the thibaut. If someone smother the thibaut and the thibaut is immaculate then they like the thibaut. If someone pollenate the thibaut and the thibaut is sorrowing then they eat the ignatius. If someone is mongolian then they are sorrowing. If someone is mongolian and they like the thibaut then the thibaut is mongolian. The thibaut does not eat the thibaut.", "logic": "\nPollenate(ignatius, thibaut)\nSorrowing(ignatius)\nInfluent(ignatius)\nImmaculate(ignatius)\nCapitulary(ignatius)\nUncloak(ignatius, thibaut)\nSmother(ignatius, thibaut)\nPollenate(thibaut, ignatius)\nSorrowing(thibaut)\nInfluent(thibaut)\nCapitulary(thibaut)\nSmother(thibaut, ignatius)\nforall x (Smother(x, ignatius) and Pollenate(x, ignatius) -> Mongolian(ignatius))\nforall x (Pollenate(x, thibaut) and Capitulary(thibaut) -> Smother(thibaut, ignatius))\nMongolian(ignatius) and Capitulary(ignatius) -> Smother(ignatius, thibaut)\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Pollenate(x, thibaut))\nforall x (Smother(x, thibaut) and Immaculate(thibaut) -> Uncloak(x, thibaut))\nforall x (Pollenate(x, thibaut) and Sorrowing(thibaut) -> Pollenate(x, ignatius))\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Sorrowing(x))\nforall x (Mongolian(x) and Uncloak(x, thibaut) -> Mongolian(thibaut))\n\nnot Pollenate(thibaut, thibaut)\n\nSmother(thibaut, ignatius) and Pollenate(thibaut, ignatius) and forall x (Smother(x, ignatius) and Pollenate(x, ignatius) -> Mongolian(ignatius)) -> therefore Mongolian(ignatius) Mongolian(ignatius) and Uncloak(ignatius, thibaut) and forall x (Mongolian(x) and Uncloak(x, thibaut) -> Mongolian(thibaut)) -> therefore Mongolian(thibaut) Mongolian(thibaut) and forall x (Mongolian(x) -> Pollenate(x, thibaut)) -> therefore Pollenate(thibaut, thibaut)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The alaa straw the tiena. The alaa is unwearied. The alaa is monistic. The alaa is avenged. The alaa is contrary. The alaa tantalize the tiena. The alaa spell the tiena. The tiena straw the alaa. The tiena is unwearied. The tiena is monistic. The tiena is contrary. The tiena spell the alaa. If someone spell the alaa and they eat the alaa then the alaa is underclass. If someone straw the tiena and the tiena is contrary then the tiena spell the alaa. If the alaa is underclass and the alaa is contrary then the alaa spell the tiena. If someone is underclass then they eat the tiena. If someone spell the tiena and the tiena is avenged then they like the tiena. If someone straw the tiena and the tiena is unwearied then they eat the alaa. If someone is underclass then they are unwearied. If someone is underclass and they like the tiena then the tiena is underclass. The tiena does not like the tiena.", "logic": "\nStraw(alaa, tiena)\nUnwearied(alaa)\nMonistic(alaa)\nAvenged(alaa)\nContrary(alaa)\nTantalize(alaa, tiena)\nSpell(alaa, tiena)\nStraw(tiena, alaa)\nUnwearied(tiena)\nMonistic(tiena)\nContrary(tiena)\nSpell(tiena, alaa)\nforall x (Spell(x, alaa) and Straw(x, alaa) -> Underclass(alaa))\nforall x (Straw(x, tiena) and Contrary(tiena) -> Spell(tiena, alaa))\nUnderclass(alaa) and Contrary(alaa) -> Spell(alaa, tiena)\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Straw(x, tiena))\nforall x (Spell(x, tiena) and Avenged(tiena) -> Tantalize(x, tiena))\nforall x (Straw(x, tiena) and Unwearied(tiena) -> Straw(x, alaa))\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Unwearied(x))\nforall x (Underclass(x) and Tantalize(x, tiena) -> Underclass(tiena))\n\nnot Tantalize(tiena, tiena)\n\nforall x (Spell(x, tiena) and Avenged(tiena) -> Tantalize(x, tiena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The spud bitch the dorothy. The spud is cresson. The spud is apetalous. The spud is fugitive. The spud is hemostatic. The spud allure the dorothy. The spud conflict the dorothy. The dorothy bitch the spud. The dorothy is cresson. The dorothy is apetalous. The dorothy is hemostatic. The dorothy conflict the spud. If someone conflict the spud and they eat the spud then the spud is comfy. If someone bitch the dorothy and the dorothy is hemostatic then the dorothy conflict the spud. If the spud is comfy and the spud is hemostatic then the spud conflict the dorothy. If someone is comfy then they eat the dorothy. If someone conflict the dorothy and the dorothy is fugitive then they like the dorothy. If someone bitch the dorothy and the dorothy is cresson then they eat the spud. If someone is comfy then they are cresson. If someone is comfy and they like the dorothy then the dorothy is comfy. The dorothy allure the spud.", "logic": "\nBitch(spud, dorothy)\nCresson(spud)\nApetalous(spud)\nFugitive(spud)\nHemostatic(spud)\nAllure(spud, dorothy)\nConflict(spud, dorothy)\nBitch(dorothy, spud)\nCresson(dorothy)\nApetalous(dorothy)\nHemostatic(dorothy)\nConflict(dorothy, spud)\nforall x (Conflict(x, spud) and Bitch(x, spud) -> Comfy(spud))\nforall x (Bitch(x, dorothy) and Hemostatic(dorothy) -> Conflict(dorothy, spud))\nComfy(spud) and Hemostatic(spud) -> Conflict(spud, dorothy)\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Bitch(x, dorothy))\nforall x (Conflict(x, dorothy) and Fugitive(dorothy) -> Allure(x, dorothy))\nforall x (Bitch(x, dorothy) and Cresson(dorothy) -> Bitch(x, spud))\nforall x (Comfy(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Comfy(x) and Allure(x, dorothy) -> Comfy(dorothy))\n\nAllure(dorothy, spud)\n\nAllure(dorothy, spud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The quiggly middle the ardis. The quiggly is unbendable. The quiggly is umbellate. The quiggly is gossipy. The quiggly is windblown. The quiggly snort the ardis. The quiggly paste the ardis. The ardis middle the quiggly. The ardis is unbendable. The ardis is umbellate. The ardis is windblown. The ardis paste the quiggly. If someone paste the quiggly and they eat the quiggly then the quiggly is apropos. If someone middle the ardis and the ardis is windblown then the ardis paste the quiggly. If the quiggly is apropos and the quiggly is windblown then the quiggly paste the ardis. If someone is apropos then they eat the ardis. If someone paste the ardis and the ardis is gossipy then they like the ardis. If someone middle the ardis and the ardis is unbendable then they eat the quiggly. If someone is apropos then they are unbendable. If someone is apropos and they like the ardis then the ardis is apropos. The quiggly does not like the quiggly.", "logic": "\nMiddle(quiggly, ardis)\nUnbendable(quiggly)\nUmbellate(quiggly)\nGossipy(quiggly)\nWindblown(quiggly)\nSnort(quiggly, ardis)\nPaste(quiggly, ardis)\nMiddle(ardis, quiggly)\nUnbendable(ardis)\nUmbellate(ardis)\nWindblown(ardis)\nPaste(ardis, quiggly)\nforall x (Paste(x, quiggly) and Middle(x, quiggly) -> Apropos(quiggly))\nforall x (Middle(x, ardis) and Windblown(ardis) -> Paste(ardis, quiggly))\nApropos(quiggly) and Windblown(quiggly) -> Paste(quiggly, ardis)\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Middle(x, ardis))\nforall x (Paste(x, ardis) and Gossipy(ardis) -> Snort(x, ardis))\nforall x (Middle(x, ardis) and Unbendable(ardis) -> Middle(x, quiggly))\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Apropos(x) and Snort(x, ardis) -> Apropos(ardis))\n\nnot Snort(quiggly, quiggly)\n\nnot Snort(quiggly, quiggly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The abigael include the umberto. The abigael is bobtail. The abigael is satyric. The abigael is chancy. The abigael is groomed. The abigael undersign the umberto. The abigael raze the umberto. The umberto include the abigael. The umberto is bobtail. The umberto is satyric. The umberto is groomed. The umberto raze the abigael. If someone raze the abigael and they eat the abigael then the abigael is nosed. If someone include the umberto and the umberto is groomed then the umberto raze the abigael. If the abigael is nosed and the abigael is groomed then the abigael raze the umberto. If someone is nosed then they eat the umberto. If someone raze the umberto and the umberto is chancy then they like the umberto. If someone include the umberto and the umberto is bobtail then they eat the abigael. If someone is nosed then they are bobtail. If someone is nosed and they like the umberto then the umberto is nosed. The abigael raze the abigael.", "logic": "\nInclude(abigael, umberto)\nBobtail(abigael)\nSatyric(abigael)\nChancy(abigael)\nGroomed(abigael)\nUndersign(abigael, umberto)\nRaze(abigael, umberto)\nInclude(umberto, abigael)\nBobtail(umberto)\nSatyric(umberto)\nGroomed(umberto)\nRaze(umberto, abigael)\nforall x (Raze(x, abigael) and Include(x, abigael) -> Nosed(abigael))\nforall x (Include(x, umberto) and Groomed(umberto) -> Raze(umberto, abigael))\nNosed(abigael) and Groomed(abigael) -> Raze(abigael, umberto)\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Include(x, umberto))\nforall x (Raze(x, umberto) and Chancy(umberto) -> Undersign(x, umberto))\nforall x (Include(x, umberto) and Bobtail(umberto) -> Include(x, abigael))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Bobtail(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) and Undersign(x, umberto) -> Nosed(umberto))\n\nRaze(abigael, abigael)\n\nRaze(abigael, abigael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The jeniece bonnet the noell. The jeniece is unredeemed. The jeniece is emotional. The jeniece is sterilized. The jeniece is vitalizing. The jeniece throne the noell. The jeniece disguise the noell. The noell bonnet the jeniece. The noell is unredeemed. The noell is emotional. The noell is vitalizing. The noell disguise the jeniece. If someone disguise the jeniece and they eat the jeniece then the jeniece is choppy. If someone bonnet the noell and the noell is vitalizing then the noell disguise the jeniece. If the jeniece is choppy and the jeniece is vitalizing then the jeniece disguise the noell. If someone is choppy then they eat the noell. If someone disguise the noell and the noell is sterilized then they like the noell. If someone bonnet the noell and the noell is unredeemed then they eat the jeniece. If someone is choppy then they are unredeemed. If someone is choppy and they like the noell then the noell is choppy. The noell does not visit the noell.", "logic": "\nBonnet(jeniece, noell)\nUnredeemed(jeniece)\nEmotional(jeniece)\nSterilized(jeniece)\nVitalizing(jeniece)\nThrone(jeniece, noell)\nDisguise(jeniece, noell)\nBonnet(noell, jeniece)\nUnredeemed(noell)\nEmotional(noell)\nVitalizing(noell)\nDisguise(noell, jeniece)\nforall x (Disguise(x, jeniece) and Bonnet(x, jeniece) -> Choppy(jeniece))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, noell) and Vitalizing(noell) -> Disguise(noell, jeniece))\nChoppy(jeniece) and Vitalizing(jeniece) -> Disguise(jeniece, noell)\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Bonnet(x, noell))\nforall x (Disguise(x, noell) and Sterilized(noell) -> Throne(x, noell))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, noell) and Unredeemed(noell) -> Bonnet(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Choppy(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nforall x (Choppy(x) and Throne(x, noell) -> Choppy(noell))\n\nnot Disguise(noell, noell)\n\nnot Disguise(noell, noell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The reeba betide the becki. The reeba is numerable. The reeba is bregmatic. The reeba is ubiquitous. The reeba is telluric. The reeba suggest the becki. The reeba convolute the becki. The becki betide the reeba. The becki is numerable. The becki is bregmatic. The becki is telluric. The becki convolute the reeba. If someone convolute the reeba and they eat the reeba then the reeba is cerebral. If someone betide the becki and the becki is telluric then the becki convolute the reeba. If the reeba is cerebral and the reeba is telluric then the reeba convolute the becki. If someone is cerebral then they eat the becki. If someone convolute the becki and the becki is ubiquitous then they like the becki. If someone betide the becki and the becki is numerable then they eat the reeba. If someone is cerebral then they are numerable. If someone is cerebral and they like the becki then the becki is cerebral. The becki is ubiquitous.", "logic": "\nBetide(reeba, becki)\nNumerable(reeba)\nBregmatic(reeba)\nUbiquitous(reeba)\nTelluric(reeba)\nSuggest(reeba, becki)\nConvolute(reeba, becki)\nBetide(becki, reeba)\nNumerable(becki)\nBregmatic(becki)\nTelluric(becki)\nConvolute(becki, reeba)\nforall x (Convolute(x, reeba) and Betide(x, reeba) -> Cerebral(reeba))\nforall x (Betide(x, becki) and Telluric(becki) -> Convolute(becki, reeba))\nCerebral(reeba) and Telluric(reeba) -> Convolute(reeba, becki)\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> Betide(x, becki))\nforall x (Convolute(x, becki) and Ubiquitous(becki) -> Suggest(x, becki))\nforall x (Betide(x, becki) and Numerable(becki) -> Betide(x, reeba))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> Numerable(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) and Suggest(x, becki) -> Cerebral(becki))\n\nUbiquitous(becki)\n\nUbiquitous(becki) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-808"} {"premises": "The ranee brooch the benedetta. The benedetta fraternize the ranee. If someone brooch the ranee then they do not chase the benedetta. If someone fraternize the ranee then the ranee complicate the benedetta. If someone fraternize the benedetta then the benedetta is achromatic. If someone complicate the benedetta then they are favourite. All favourite people are not alar. If someone complicate the benedetta and they are not favourite then the benedetta is not unhewn. The benedetta fraternize the ranee.", "logic": "\nBrooch(ranee, benedetta)\nFraternize(benedetta, ranee)\nforall x (Brooch(x, ranee) -> not Brooch(x, benedetta))\nforall x (Fraternize(x, ranee) -> Complicate(ranee, benedetta))\nforall x (Fraternize(x, benedetta) -> Achromatic(benedetta))\nforall x (Complicate(x, benedetta) -> Favourite(x))\nforall x (Favourite(x) -> not Alar(x))\nforall x (Complicate(x, benedetta) and not Favourite(x) -> not Unhewn(benedetta))\n\nFraternize(benedetta, ranee)\n\ntherefore Fraternize(benedetta, ranee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The marsh housekeep the alvinia. The alvinia rubify the marsh. If someone housekeep the marsh then they do not chase the alvinia. If someone rubify the marsh then the marsh enliven the alvinia. If someone rubify the alvinia then the alvinia is brainy. If someone enliven the alvinia then they are audacious. All audacious people are not untruthful. If someone enliven the alvinia and they are not audacious then the alvinia is not corpulent. The marsh does not chase the alvinia.", "logic": "\nHousekeep(marsh, alvinia)\nRubify(alvinia, marsh)\nforall x (Housekeep(x, marsh) -> not Housekeep(x, alvinia))\nforall x (Rubify(x, marsh) -> Enliven(marsh, alvinia))\nforall x (Rubify(x, alvinia) -> Brainy(alvinia))\nforall x (Enliven(x, alvinia) -> Audacious(x))\nforall x (Audacious(x) -> not Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Enliven(x, alvinia) and not Audacious(x) -> not Corpulent(alvinia))\n\nnot Housekeep(marsh, alvinia)\n\ntherefore Housekeep(marsh, alvinia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The kaitlynn launder the neall. The neall scam the kaitlynn. If someone launder the kaitlynn then they do not chase the neall. If someone scam the kaitlynn then the kaitlynn relieve the neall. If someone scam the neall then the neall is footless. If someone relieve the neall then they are garmented. All garmented people are not telluric. If someone relieve the neall and they are not garmented then the neall is not mouthlike. The kaitlynn relieve the neall.", "logic": "\nLaunder(kaitlynn, neall)\nScam(neall, kaitlynn)\nforall x (Launder(x, kaitlynn) -> not Launder(x, neall))\nforall x (Scam(x, kaitlynn) -> Relieve(kaitlynn, neall))\nforall x (Scam(x, neall) -> Footless(neall))\nforall x (Relieve(x, neall) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Garmented(x) -> not Telluric(x))\nforall x (Relieve(x, neall) and not Garmented(x) -> not Mouthlike(neall))\n\nRelieve(kaitlynn, neall)\n\nScam(neall, kaitlynn) and forall x (Scam(x, kaitlynn) -> Relieve(kaitlynn, neall)) -> therefore Relieve(kaitlynn, neall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The lorenza ammonify the sibeal. The sibeal masturbate the lorenza. If someone ammonify the lorenza then they do not chase the sibeal. If someone masturbate the lorenza then the lorenza popularise the sibeal. If someone masturbate the sibeal then the sibeal is reclusive. If someone popularise the sibeal then they are unshaded. All unshaded people are not archival. If someone popularise the sibeal and they are not unshaded then the sibeal is not laminal. The lorenza does not eat the sibeal.", "logic": "\nAmmonify(lorenza, sibeal)\nMasturbate(sibeal, lorenza)\nforall x (Ammonify(x, lorenza) -> not Ammonify(x, sibeal))\nforall x (Masturbate(x, lorenza) -> Popularise(lorenza, sibeal))\nforall x (Masturbate(x, sibeal) -> Reclusive(sibeal))\nforall x (Popularise(x, sibeal) -> Unshaded(x))\nforall x (Unshaded(x) -> not Archival(x))\nforall x (Popularise(x, sibeal) and not Unshaded(x) -> not Laminal(sibeal))\n\nnot Popularise(lorenza, sibeal)\n\nMasturbate(sibeal, lorenza) and forall x (Masturbate(x, lorenza) -> Popularise(lorenza, sibeal)) -> therefore Popularise(lorenza, sibeal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The roanna blandish the fabrice. The fabrice monetize the roanna. If someone blandish the roanna then they do not chase the fabrice. If someone monetize the roanna then the roanna chat the fabrice. If someone monetize the fabrice then the fabrice is metastable. If someone chat the fabrice then they are unarguable. All unarguable people are not previous. If someone chat the fabrice and they are not unarguable then the fabrice is not koranic. The roanna is unarguable.", "logic": "\nBlandish(roanna, fabrice)\nMonetize(fabrice, roanna)\nforall x (Blandish(x, roanna) -> not Blandish(x, fabrice))\nforall x (Monetize(x, roanna) -> Chat(roanna, fabrice))\nforall x (Monetize(x, fabrice) -> Metastable(fabrice))\nforall x (Chat(x, fabrice) -> Unarguable(x))\nforall x (Unarguable(x) -> not Previous(x))\nforall x (Chat(x, fabrice) and not Unarguable(x) -> not Koranic(fabrice))\n\nUnarguable(roanna)\n\nMonetize(fabrice, roanna) and forall x (Monetize(x, roanna) -> Chat(roanna, fabrice)) -> therefore Chat(roanna, fabrice) Chat(roanna, fabrice) and forall x (Chat(x, fabrice) -> Unarguable(x)) -> therefore Unarguable(roanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The annmaria nibble the windy. The windy embed the annmaria. If someone nibble the annmaria then they do not chase the windy. If someone embed the annmaria then the annmaria note the windy. If someone embed the windy then the windy is burning. If someone note the windy then they are squeaky. All squeaky people are not lobed. If someone note the windy and they are not squeaky then the windy is not umber. The annmaria is not squeaky.", "logic": "\nNibble(annmaria, windy)\nEmbed(windy, annmaria)\nforall x (Nibble(x, annmaria) -> not Nibble(x, windy))\nforall x (Embed(x, annmaria) -> Note(annmaria, windy))\nforall x (Embed(x, windy) -> Burning(windy))\nforall x (Note(x, windy) -> Squeaky(x))\nforall x (Squeaky(x) -> not Lobed(x))\nforall x (Note(x, windy) and not Squeaky(x) -> not Umber(windy))\n\nnot Squeaky(annmaria)\n\nEmbed(windy, annmaria) and forall x (Embed(x, annmaria) -> Note(annmaria, windy)) -> therefore Note(annmaria, windy) Note(annmaria, windy) and forall x (Note(x, windy) -> Squeaky(x)) -> therefore Squeaky(annmaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The berti magnetise the rodrique. The rodrique unbutton the berti. If someone magnetise the berti then they do not chase the rodrique. If someone unbutton the berti then the berti ranch the rodrique. If someone unbutton the rodrique then the rodrique is acapnic. If someone ranch the rodrique then they are unbloody. All unbloody people are not dumb. If someone ranch the rodrique and they are not unbloody then the rodrique is not repellant. The berti is not dumb.", "logic": "\nMagnetise(berti, rodrique)\nUnbutton(rodrique, berti)\nforall x (Magnetise(x, berti) -> not Magnetise(x, rodrique))\nforall x (Unbutton(x, berti) -> Ranch(berti, rodrique))\nforall x (Unbutton(x, rodrique) -> Acapnic(rodrique))\nforall x (Ranch(x, rodrique) -> Unbloody(x))\nforall x (Unbloody(x) -> not Dumb(x))\nforall x (Ranch(x, rodrique) and not Unbloody(x) -> not Repellant(rodrique))\n\nnot Dumb(berti)\n\nUnbutton(rodrique, berti) and forall x (Unbutton(x, berti) -> Ranch(berti, rodrique)) -> therefore Ranch(berti, rodrique) Ranch(berti, rodrique) and forall x (Ranch(x, rodrique) -> Unbloody(x)) -> therefore Unbloody(berti) Unbloody(berti) and forall x (Unbloody(x) -> not Dumb(x)) -> therefore not Dumb(berti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The jaimie wheeze the edgar. The edgar skirmish the jaimie. If someone wheeze the jaimie then they do not chase the edgar. If someone skirmish the jaimie then the jaimie swage the edgar. If someone skirmish the edgar then the edgar is propertied. If someone swage the edgar then they are cranial. All cranial people are not ostensible. If someone swage the edgar and they are not cranial then the edgar is not persian. The jaimie is ostensible.", "logic": "\nWheeze(jaimie, edgar)\nSkirmish(edgar, jaimie)\nforall x (Wheeze(x, jaimie) -> not Wheeze(x, edgar))\nforall x (Skirmish(x, jaimie) -> Swage(jaimie, edgar))\nforall x (Skirmish(x, edgar) -> Propertied(edgar))\nforall x (Swage(x, edgar) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Cranial(x) -> not Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Swage(x, edgar) and not Cranial(x) -> not Persian(edgar))\n\nOstensible(jaimie)\n\nSkirmish(edgar, jaimie) and forall x (Skirmish(x, jaimie) -> Swage(jaimie, edgar)) -> therefore Swage(jaimie, edgar) Swage(jaimie, edgar) and forall x (Swage(x, edgar) -> Cranial(x)) -> therefore Cranial(jaimie) Cranial(jaimie) and forall x (Cranial(x) -> not Ostensible(x)) -> therefore not Ostensible(jaimie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The wilmer decalcify the rubetta. The rubetta tweeze the wilmer. If someone decalcify the wilmer then they do not chase the rubetta. If someone tweeze the wilmer then the wilmer throttle the rubetta. If someone tweeze the rubetta then the rubetta is compulsive. If someone throttle the rubetta then they are approved. All approved people are not hourly. If someone throttle the rubetta and they are not approved then the rubetta is not besotted. The rubetta is not compulsive.", "logic": "\nDecalcify(wilmer, rubetta)\nTweeze(rubetta, wilmer)\nforall x (Decalcify(x, wilmer) -> not Decalcify(x, rubetta))\nforall x (Tweeze(x, wilmer) -> Throttle(wilmer, rubetta))\nforall x (Tweeze(x, rubetta) -> Compulsive(rubetta))\nforall x (Throttle(x, rubetta) -> Approved(x))\nforall x (Approved(x) -> not Hourly(x))\nforall x (Throttle(x, rubetta) and not Approved(x) -> not Besotted(rubetta))\n\nnot Compulsive(rubetta)\n\nforall x (Tweeze(x, rubetta) -> Compulsive(rubetta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The cindi spit the terina. The terina molest the cindi. If someone spit the cindi then they do not chase the terina. If someone molest the cindi then the cindi putrefy the terina. If someone molest the terina then the terina is bedewed. If someone putrefy the terina then they are keyed. All keyed people are not demolished. If someone putrefy the terina and they are not keyed then the terina is not fecal. The terina is keyed.", "logic": "\nSpit(cindi, terina)\nMolest(terina, cindi)\nforall x (Spit(x, cindi) -> not Spit(x, terina))\nforall x (Molest(x, cindi) -> Putrefy(cindi, terina))\nforall x (Molest(x, terina) -> Bedewed(terina))\nforall x (Putrefy(x, terina) -> Keyed(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> not Demolished(x))\nforall x (Putrefy(x, terina) and not Keyed(x) -> not Fecal(terina))\n\nKeyed(terina)\n\nforall x (Putrefy(x, terina) -> Keyed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The curt coldwork the welby. The welby slug the curt. If someone coldwork the curt then they do not chase the welby. If someone slug the curt then the curt bridge the welby. If someone slug the welby then the welby is alkalotic. If someone bridge the welby then they are chylific. All chylific people are not destitute. If someone bridge the welby and they are not chylific then the welby is not indelible. The welby is not young.", "logic": "\nColdwork(curt, welby)\nSlug(welby, curt)\nforall x (Coldwork(x, curt) -> not Coldwork(x, welby))\nforall x (Slug(x, curt) -> Bridge(curt, welby))\nforall x (Slug(x, welby) -> Alkalotic(welby))\nforall x (Bridge(x, welby) -> Chylific(x))\nforall x (Chylific(x) -> not Destitute(x))\nforall x (Bridge(x, welby) and not Chylific(x) -> not Indelible(welby))\n\nnot Young(welby)\n\nnot Young(welby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The pavia recount the alonzo. The alonzo nitrate the pavia. If someone recount the pavia then they do not chase the alonzo. If someone nitrate the pavia then the pavia reshuffle the alonzo. If someone nitrate the alonzo then the alonzo is greased. If someone reshuffle the alonzo then they are collateral. All collateral people are not excitative. If someone reshuffle the alonzo and they are not collateral then the alonzo is not reachable. The pavia is reachable.", "logic": "\nRecount(pavia, alonzo)\nNitrate(alonzo, pavia)\nforall x (Recount(x, pavia) -> not Recount(x, alonzo))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, pavia) -> Reshuffle(pavia, alonzo))\nforall x (Nitrate(x, alonzo) -> Greased(alonzo))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, alonzo) -> Collateral(x))\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> not Excitative(x))\nforall x (Reshuffle(x, alonzo) and not Collateral(x) -> not Reachable(alonzo))\n\nReachable(pavia)\n\nReachable(pavia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The valli sate the kassi. The kassi travesty the valli. If someone sate the valli then they do not chase the kassi. If someone travesty the valli then the valli serve the kassi. If someone travesty the kassi then the kassi is doddery. If someone serve the kassi then they are last. All last people are not abient. If someone serve the kassi and they are not last then the kassi is not unversed. The valli is not young.", "logic": "\nSate(valli, kassi)\nTravesty(kassi, valli)\nforall x (Sate(x, valli) -> not Sate(x, kassi))\nforall x (Travesty(x, valli) -> Serve(valli, kassi))\nforall x (Travesty(x, kassi) -> Doddery(kassi))\nforall x (Serve(x, kassi) -> Last(x))\nforall x (Last(x) -> not Abient(x))\nforall x (Serve(x, kassi) and not Last(x) -> not Unversed(kassi))\n\nnot Young(valli)\n\nnot Young(valli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The cyrille platinize the carie. The carie stir the cyrille. If someone platinize the cyrille then they do not chase the carie. If someone stir the cyrille then the cyrille dilapidate the carie. If someone stir the carie then the carie is northern. If someone dilapidate the carie then they are headlike. All headlike people are not quantized. If someone dilapidate the carie and they are not headlike then the carie is not warlike. The cyrille stir the carie.", "logic": "\nPlatinize(cyrille, carie)\nStir(carie, cyrille)\nforall x (Platinize(x, cyrille) -> not Platinize(x, carie))\nforall x (Stir(x, cyrille) -> Dilapidate(cyrille, carie))\nforall x (Stir(x, carie) -> Northern(carie))\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, carie) -> Headlike(x))\nforall x (Headlike(x) -> not Quantized(x))\nforall x (Dilapidate(x, carie) and not Headlike(x) -> not Warlike(carie))\n\nStir(cyrille, carie)\n\nStir(cyrille, carie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The fancy aluminize the oprah. The oprah topple the fancy. If someone aluminize the fancy then they do not chase the oprah. If someone topple the fancy then the fancy charleston the oprah. If someone topple the oprah then the oprah is indigo. If someone charleston the oprah then they are climatical. All climatical people are not phobic. If someone charleston the oprah and they are not climatical then the oprah is not untrimmed. The oprah does not eat the fancy.", "logic": "\nAluminize(fancy, oprah)\nTopple(oprah, fancy)\nforall x (Aluminize(x, fancy) -> not Aluminize(x, oprah))\nforall x (Topple(x, fancy) -> Charleston(fancy, oprah))\nforall x (Topple(x, oprah) -> Indigo(oprah))\nforall x (Charleston(x, oprah) -> Climatical(x))\nforall x (Climatical(x) -> not Phobic(x))\nforall x (Charleston(x, oprah) and not Climatical(x) -> not Untrimmed(oprah))\n\nnot Charleston(oprah, fancy)\n\nnot Charleston(oprah, fancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "The selinda grunt the vivie. The vivie elocute the selinda. If someone grunt the selinda then they do not chase the vivie. If someone elocute the selinda then the selinda croak the vivie. If someone elocute the vivie then the vivie is concerted. If someone croak the vivie then they are bilateral. All bilateral people are not sexless. If someone croak the vivie and they are not bilateral then the vivie is not eccentric. The selinda grunt the selinda.", "logic": "\nGrunt(selinda, vivie)\nElocute(vivie, selinda)\nforall x (Grunt(x, selinda) -> not Grunt(x, vivie))\nforall x (Elocute(x, selinda) -> Croak(selinda, vivie))\nforall x (Elocute(x, vivie) -> Concerted(vivie))\nforall x (Croak(x, vivie) -> Bilateral(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> not Sexless(x))\nforall x (Croak(x, vivie) and not Bilateral(x) -> not Eccentric(vivie))\n\nGrunt(selinda, selinda)\n\nGrunt(selinda, selinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1515"} {"premises": "Elmira is anhydrous. Elmira is greenside. Elmira is immemorial. If something is stopped and anhydrous then it is pharyngeal. If Elmira is precatory then Elmira is bullate. If something is immemorial then it is precatory. Blue, anhydrous things are precatory. All bullate things are stopped. If something is immemorial and not precatory then it is greenside. Elmira is greenside.", "logic": "\nAnhydrous(elmira)\nGreenside(elmira)\nImmemorial(elmira)\nforall x (Stopped(x) and Anhydrous(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nPrecatory(elmira) -> Bullate(elmira)\nforall x (Immemorial(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Stopped(x) and Anhydrous(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Bullate(x) -> Stopped(x))\nforall x (Immemorial(x) and not Precatory(x) -> Greenside(x))\n\nGreenside(elmira)\n\ntherefore Greenside(elmira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Leonid is impure. Leonid is invitatory. Leonid is untrusty. If something is pensive and impure then it is geodesical. If Leonid is electronic then Leonid is arboreal. If something is untrusty then it is electronic. Blue, impure things are electronic. All arboreal things are pensive. If something is untrusty and not electronic then it is invitatory. Leonid is not invitatory.", "logic": "\nImpure(leonid)\nInvitatory(leonid)\nUntrusty(leonid)\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Impure(x) -> Geodesical(x))\nElectronic(leonid) -> Arboreal(leonid)\nforall x (Untrusty(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Impure(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Arboreal(x) -> Pensive(x))\nforall x (Untrusty(x) and not Electronic(x) -> Invitatory(x))\n\nnot Invitatory(leonid)\n\ntherefore Invitatory(leonid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Beau is disquieted. Beau is disarming. Beau is doughy. If something is homostyled and disquieted then it is birken. If Beau is heartless then Beau is fuddled. If something is doughy then it is heartless. Blue, disquieted things are heartless. All fuddled things are homostyled. If something is doughy and not heartless then it is disarming. Beau is heartless.", "logic": "\nDisquieted(beau)\nDisarming(beau)\nDoughy(beau)\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Disquieted(x) -> Birken(x))\nHeartless(beau) -> Fuddled(beau)\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Disquieted(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Fuddled(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nforall x (Doughy(x) and not Heartless(x) -> Disarming(x))\n\nHeartless(beau)\n\nDoughy(beau) and forall x (Doughy(x) -> Heartless(x)) -> therefore Heartless(beau)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "France is trite. France is sikh. France is employable. If something is lapidary and trite then it is geniculate. If France is negative then France is throwback. If something is employable then it is negative. Blue, trite things are negative. All throwback things are lapidary. If something is employable and not negative then it is sikh. France is not negative.", "logic": "\nTrite(france)\nSikh(france)\nEmployable(france)\nforall x (Lapidary(x) and Trite(x) -> Geniculate(x))\nNegative(france) -> Throwback(france)\nforall x (Employable(x) -> Negative(x))\nforall x (Lapidary(x) and Trite(x) -> Negative(x))\nforall x (Throwback(x) -> Lapidary(x))\nforall x (Employable(x) and not Negative(x) -> Sikh(x))\n\nnot Negative(france)\n\nEmployable(france) and forall x (Employable(x) -> Negative(x)) -> therefore Negative(france)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Gisella is wayfaring. Gisella is warped. Gisella is personable. If something is lxxxiii and wayfaring then it is anuran. If Gisella is behindhand then Gisella is tailed. If something is personable then it is behindhand. Blue, wayfaring things are behindhand. All tailed things are lxxxiii. If something is personable and not behindhand then it is warped. Gisella is tailed.", "logic": "\nWayfaring(gisella)\nWarped(gisella)\nPersonable(gisella)\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> Anuran(x))\nBehindhand(gisella) -> Tailed(gisella)\nforall x (Personable(x) -> Behindhand(x))\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) and Wayfaring(x) -> Behindhand(x))\nforall x (Tailed(x) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Personable(x) and not Behindhand(x) -> Warped(x))\n\nTailed(gisella)\n\nPersonable(gisella) and forall x (Personable(x) -> Behindhand(x)) -> therefore Behindhand(gisella) Behindhand(gisella) and Behindhand(gisella) -> Tailed(gisella) -> therefore Tailed(gisella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Seamus is woozy. Seamus is climbable. Seamus is onside. If something is silicious and woozy then it is bronze. If Seamus is demanding then Seamus is frightful. If something is onside then it is demanding. Blue, woozy things are demanding. All frightful things are silicious. If something is onside and not demanding then it is climbable. Seamus is not frightful.", "logic": "\nWoozy(seamus)\nClimbable(seamus)\nOnside(seamus)\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Woozy(x) -> Bronze(x))\nDemanding(seamus) -> Frightful(seamus)\nforall x (Onside(x) -> Demanding(x))\nforall x (Silicious(x) and Woozy(x) -> Demanding(x))\nforall x (Frightful(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Onside(x) and not Demanding(x) -> Climbable(x))\n\nnot Frightful(seamus)\n\nOnside(seamus) and forall x (Onside(x) -> Demanding(x)) -> therefore Demanding(seamus) Demanding(seamus) and Demanding(seamus) -> Frightful(seamus) -> therefore Frightful(seamus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Celestyna is unrhymed. Celestyna is playable. Celestyna is acyclic. If something is cured and unrhymed then it is watchful. If Celestyna is glycogenic then Celestyna is frowsy. If something is acyclic then it is glycogenic. Blue, unrhymed things are glycogenic. All frowsy things are cured. If something is acyclic and not glycogenic then it is playable. Celestyna is cured.", "logic": "\nUnrhymed(celestyna)\nPlayable(celestyna)\nAcyclic(celestyna)\nforall x (Cured(x) and Unrhymed(x) -> Watchful(x))\nGlycogenic(celestyna) -> Frowsy(celestyna)\nforall x (Acyclic(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) and Unrhymed(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) and not Glycogenic(x) -> Playable(x))\n\nCured(celestyna)\n\nAcyclic(celestyna) and forall x (Acyclic(x) -> Glycogenic(x)) -> therefore Glycogenic(celestyna) Glycogenic(celestyna) and Glycogenic(celestyna) -> Frowsy(celestyna) -> therefore Frowsy(celestyna) Frowsy(celestyna) and forall x (Frowsy(x) -> Cured(x)) -> therefore Cured(celestyna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "Ilene is rushlike. Ilene is plumbable. Ilene is suckled. If something is hexangular and rushlike then it is anxious. If Ilene is crinkly then Ilene is lento. If something is suckled then it is crinkly. Blue, rushlike things are crinkly. All lento things are hexangular. If something is suckled and not crinkly then it is plumbable. Ilene is not hexangular.", "logic": "\nRushlike(ilene)\nPlumbable(ilene)\nSuckled(ilene)\nforall x (Hexangular(x) and Rushlike(x) -> Anxious(x))\nCrinkly(ilene) -> Lento(ilene)\nforall x (Suckled(x) -> Crinkly(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) and Rushlike(x) -> Crinkly(x))\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Hexangular(x))\nforall x (Suckled(x) and not Crinkly(x) -> Plumbable(x))\n\nnot Hexangular(ilene)\n\nSuckled(ilene) and forall x (Suckled(x) -> Crinkly(x)) -> therefore Crinkly(ilene) Crinkly(ilene) and Crinkly(ilene) -> Lento(ilene) -> therefore Lento(ilene) Lento(ilene) and forall x (Lento(x) -> Hexangular(x)) -> therefore Hexangular(ilene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The wendel is mordacious. The wendel tamper the garwood. The garwood is queer. If someone is raucous and they see the wendel then they visit the garwood. If someone is queer and they see the wendel then the wendel is uniformed. If someone tamper the garwood then the garwood tamper the wendel. If someone is queer and they see the wendel then the wendel tamper the garwood. If someone tamper the garwood then they like the wendel. If someone is raucous then they see the wendel. If someone is mordacious then they like the wendel. If someone is mordacious then they are raucous. The wendel is mordacious.", "logic": "\nMordacious(wendel)\nTamper(wendel, garwood)\nQueer(garwood)\nforall x (Raucous(x) and Tamper(x, wendel) -> Turn(x, garwood))\nforall x (Queer(x) and Tamper(x, wendel) -> Uniformed(wendel))\nforall x (Tamper(x, garwood) -> Tamper(garwood, wendel))\nforall x (Queer(x) and Tamper(x, wendel) -> Tamper(wendel, garwood))\nforall x (Tamper(x, garwood) -> Pain(x, wendel))\nforall x (Raucous(x) -> Tamper(x, wendel))\nforall x (Mordacious(x) -> Pain(x, wendel))\nforall x (Mordacious(x) -> Raucous(x))\n\nMordacious(wendel)\n\ntherefore Mordacious(wendel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The dorothy is agonized. The dorothy cave the selle. The selle is settled. If someone is cilial and they see the dorothy then they visit the selle. If someone is settled and they see the dorothy then the dorothy is accoutred. If someone cave the selle then the selle cave the dorothy. If someone is settled and they see the dorothy then the dorothy cave the selle. If someone cave the selle then they like the dorothy. If someone is cilial then they see the dorothy. If someone is agonized then they like the dorothy. If someone is agonized then they are cilial. The dorothy is not agonized.", "logic": "\nAgonized(dorothy)\nCave(dorothy, selle)\nSettled(selle)\nforall x (Cilial(x) and Cave(x, dorothy) -> Secern(x, selle))\nforall x (Settled(x) and Cave(x, dorothy) -> Accoutred(dorothy))\nforall x (Cave(x, selle) -> Cave(selle, dorothy))\nforall x (Settled(x) and Cave(x, dorothy) -> Cave(dorothy, selle))\nforall x (Cave(x, selle) -> Transfuse(x, dorothy))\nforall x (Cilial(x) -> Cave(x, dorothy))\nforall x (Agonized(x) -> Transfuse(x, dorothy))\nforall x (Agonized(x) -> Cilial(x))\n\nnot Agonized(dorothy)\n\ntherefore Agonized(dorothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The sting is invitatory. The sting irritate the esmerelda. The esmerelda is auspicious. If someone is mouthless and they see the sting then they visit the esmerelda. If someone is auspicious and they see the sting then the sting is flaccid. If someone irritate the esmerelda then the esmerelda irritate the sting. If someone is auspicious and they see the sting then the sting irritate the esmerelda. If someone irritate the esmerelda then they like the sting. If someone is mouthless then they see the sting. If someone is invitatory then they like the sting. If someone is invitatory then they are mouthless. The sting is mouthless.", "logic": "\nInvitatory(sting)\nIrritate(sting, esmerelda)\nAuspicious(esmerelda)\nforall x (Mouthless(x) and Irritate(x, sting) -> Misspeak(x, esmerelda))\nforall x (Auspicious(x) and Irritate(x, sting) -> Flaccid(sting))\nforall x (Irritate(x, esmerelda) -> Irritate(esmerelda, sting))\nforall x (Auspicious(x) and Irritate(x, sting) -> Irritate(sting, esmerelda))\nforall x (Irritate(x, esmerelda) -> Tend(x, sting))\nforall x (Mouthless(x) -> Irritate(x, sting))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Tend(x, sting))\nforall x (Invitatory(x) -> Mouthless(x))\n\nMouthless(sting)\n\nInvitatory(sting) and forall x (Invitatory(x) -> Mouthless(x)) -> therefore Mouthless(sting)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The ambrosius is ranking. The ambrosius punish the fernando. The fernando is plucked. If someone is increased and they see the ambrosius then they visit the fernando. If someone is plucked and they see the ambrosius then the ambrosius is rubberlike. If someone punish the fernando then the fernando punish the ambrosius. If someone is plucked and they see the ambrosius then the ambrosius punish the fernando. If someone punish the fernando then they like the ambrosius. If someone is increased then they see the ambrosius. If someone is ranking then they like the ambrosius. If someone is ranking then they are increased. The fernando does not see the ambrosius.", "logic": "\nRanking(ambrosius)\nPunish(ambrosius, fernando)\nPlucked(fernando)\nforall x (Increased(x) and Punish(x, ambrosius) -> Channelize(x, fernando))\nforall x (Plucked(x) and Punish(x, ambrosius) -> Rubberlike(ambrosius))\nforall x (Punish(x, fernando) -> Punish(fernando, ambrosius))\nforall x (Plucked(x) and Punish(x, ambrosius) -> Punish(ambrosius, fernando))\nforall x (Punish(x, fernando) -> Chaw(x, ambrosius))\nforall x (Increased(x) -> Punish(x, ambrosius))\nforall x (Ranking(x) -> Chaw(x, ambrosius))\nforall x (Ranking(x) -> Increased(x))\n\nnot Punish(fernando, ambrosius)\n\nPunish(ambrosius, fernando) and forall x (Punish(x, fernando) -> Punish(fernando, ambrosius)) -> therefore Punish(fernando, ambrosius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The mel is flaxen. The mel staff the jarvis. The jarvis is dimorphic. If someone is purplish and they see the mel then they visit the jarvis. If someone is dimorphic and they see the mel then the mel is bookish. If someone staff the jarvis then the jarvis staff the mel. If someone is dimorphic and they see the mel then the mel staff the jarvis. If someone staff the jarvis then they like the mel. If someone is purplish then they see the mel. If someone is flaxen then they like the mel. If someone is flaxen then they are purplish. The mel is bookish.", "logic": "\nFlaxen(mel)\nStaff(mel, jarvis)\nDimorphic(jarvis)\nforall x (Purplish(x) and Staff(x, mel) -> Catnap(x, jarvis))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and Staff(x, mel) -> Bookish(mel))\nforall x (Staff(x, jarvis) -> Staff(jarvis, mel))\nforall x (Dimorphic(x) and Staff(x, mel) -> Staff(mel, jarvis))\nforall x (Staff(x, jarvis) -> Clock(x, mel))\nforall x (Purplish(x) -> Staff(x, mel))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) -> Clock(x, mel))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) -> Purplish(x))\n\nBookish(mel)\n\nStaff(mel, jarvis) and forall x (Staff(x, jarvis) -> Staff(jarvis, mel)) -> therefore Staff(jarvis, mel) Dimorphic(jarvis) and Staff(jarvis, mel) and forall x (Dimorphic(x) and Staff(x, mel) -> Bookish(mel)) -> therefore Bookish(mel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The eustace is bullish. The eustace chute the peirce. The peirce is cockeyed. If someone is peregrine and they see the eustace then they visit the peirce. If someone is cockeyed and they see the eustace then the eustace is closing. If someone chute the peirce then the peirce chute the eustace. If someone is cockeyed and they see the eustace then the eustace chute the peirce. If someone chute the peirce then they like the eustace. If someone is peregrine then they see the eustace. If someone is bullish then they like the eustace. If someone is bullish then they are peregrine. The eustace is not closing.", "logic": "\nBullish(eustace)\nChute(eustace, peirce)\nCockeyed(peirce)\nforall x (Peregrine(x) and Chute(x, eustace) -> Trust(x, peirce))\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) and Chute(x, eustace) -> Closing(eustace))\nforall x (Chute(x, peirce) -> Chute(peirce, eustace))\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) and Chute(x, eustace) -> Chute(eustace, peirce))\nforall x (Chute(x, peirce) -> Shoe(x, eustace))\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Chute(x, eustace))\nforall x (Bullish(x) -> Shoe(x, eustace))\nforall x (Bullish(x) -> Peregrine(x))\n\nnot Closing(eustace)\n\nChute(eustace, peirce) and forall x (Chute(x, peirce) -> Chute(peirce, eustace)) -> therefore Chute(peirce, eustace) Cockeyed(peirce) and Chute(peirce, eustace) and forall x (Cockeyed(x) and Chute(x, eustace) -> Closing(eustace)) -> therefore Closing(eustace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The felicle is shambolic. The felicle handicap the bertram. The bertram is twin. If someone is neutral and they see the felicle then they visit the bertram. If someone is twin and they see the felicle then the felicle is phonic. If someone handicap the bertram then the bertram handicap the felicle. If someone is twin and they see the felicle then the felicle handicap the bertram. If someone handicap the bertram then they like the felicle. If someone is neutral then they see the felicle. If someone is shambolic then they like the felicle. If someone is shambolic then they are neutral. The felicle galvanise the bertram.", "logic": "\nShambolic(felicle)\nHandicap(felicle, bertram)\nTwin(bertram)\nforall x (Neutral(x) and Handicap(x, felicle) -> Galvanise(x, bertram))\nforall x (Twin(x) and Handicap(x, felicle) -> Phonic(felicle))\nforall x (Handicap(x, bertram) -> Handicap(bertram, felicle))\nforall x (Twin(x) and Handicap(x, felicle) -> Handicap(felicle, bertram))\nforall x (Handicap(x, bertram) -> Carburize(x, felicle))\nforall x (Neutral(x) -> Handicap(x, felicle))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) -> Carburize(x, felicle))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) -> Neutral(x))\n\nGalvanise(felicle, bertram)\n\nShambolic(felicle) and forall x (Shambolic(x) -> Neutral(x)) -> therefore Neutral(felicle) Shambolic(felicle) and forall x (Shambolic(x) -> Neutral(x)) -> therefore Neutral(felicle) Neutral(felicle) and forall x (Neutral(x) -> Handicap(x, felicle)) -> therefore Handicap(felicle, felicle) Neutral(felicle) and Handicap(felicle, felicle) and forall x (Neutral(x) and Handicap(x, felicle) -> Galvanise(x, bertram)) -> therefore Galvanise(felicle, bertram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The justine is lustrous. The justine posture the lorene. The lorene is mature. If someone is hearsay and they see the justine then they visit the lorene. If someone is mature and they see the justine then the justine is wrinkled. If someone posture the lorene then the lorene posture the justine. If someone is mature and they see the justine then the justine posture the lorene. If someone posture the lorene then they like the justine. If someone is hearsay then they see the justine. If someone is lustrous then they like the justine. If someone is lustrous then they are hearsay. The justine does not visit the lorene.", "logic": "\nLustrous(justine)\nPosture(justine, lorene)\nMature(lorene)\nforall x (Hearsay(x) and Posture(x, justine) -> Deepen(x, lorene))\nforall x (Mature(x) and Posture(x, justine) -> Wrinkled(justine))\nforall x (Posture(x, lorene) -> Posture(lorene, justine))\nforall x (Mature(x) and Posture(x, justine) -> Posture(justine, lorene))\nforall x (Posture(x, lorene) -> Portend(x, justine))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) -> Posture(x, justine))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Portend(x, justine))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Hearsay(x))\n\nnot Deepen(justine, lorene)\n\nLustrous(justine) and forall x (Lustrous(x) -> Hearsay(x)) -> therefore Hearsay(justine) Lustrous(justine) and forall x (Lustrous(x) -> Hearsay(x)) -> therefore Hearsay(justine) Hearsay(justine) and forall x (Hearsay(x) -> Posture(x, justine)) -> therefore Posture(justine, justine) Hearsay(justine) and Posture(justine, justine) and forall x (Hearsay(x) and Posture(x, justine) -> Deepen(x, lorene)) -> therefore Deepen(justine, lorene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The tabbitha is skittish. The tabbitha discredit the letta. The letta is wondrous. If someone is blessed and they see the tabbitha then they visit the letta. If someone is wondrous and they see the tabbitha then the tabbitha is abused. If someone discredit the letta then the letta discredit the tabbitha. If someone is wondrous and they see the tabbitha then the tabbitha discredit the letta. If someone discredit the letta then they like the tabbitha. If someone is blessed then they see the tabbitha. If someone is skittish then they like the tabbitha. If someone is skittish then they are blessed. The letta does not visit the letta.", "logic": "\nSkittish(tabbitha)\nDiscredit(tabbitha, letta)\nWondrous(letta)\nforall x (Blessed(x) and Discredit(x, tabbitha) -> Possess(x, letta))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) and Discredit(x, tabbitha) -> Abused(tabbitha))\nforall x (Discredit(x, letta) -> Discredit(letta, tabbitha))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) and Discredit(x, tabbitha) -> Discredit(tabbitha, letta))\nforall x (Discredit(x, letta) -> Hymn(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> Discredit(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Hymn(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Skittish(x) -> Blessed(x))\n\nnot Possess(letta, letta)\n\nforall x (Blessed(x) and Discredit(x, tabbitha) -> Possess(x, letta)) <- forall x (Skittish(x) -> Blessed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The koralle is isolable. The koralle abrade the normie. The normie is subatomic. If someone is bicyclic and they see the koralle then they visit the normie. If someone is subatomic and they see the koralle then the koralle is anaphoric. If someone abrade the normie then the normie abrade the koralle. If someone is subatomic and they see the koralle then the koralle abrade the normie. If someone abrade the normie then they like the koralle. If someone is bicyclic then they see the koralle. If someone is isolable then they like the koralle. If someone is isolable then they are bicyclic. The normie secularise the koralle.", "logic": "\nIsolable(koralle)\nAbrade(koralle, normie)\nSubatomic(normie)\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Abrade(x, koralle) -> Bedight(x, normie))\nforall x (Subatomic(x) and Abrade(x, koralle) -> Anaphoric(koralle))\nforall x (Abrade(x, normie) -> Abrade(normie, koralle))\nforall x (Subatomic(x) and Abrade(x, koralle) -> Abrade(koralle, normie))\nforall x (Abrade(x, normie) -> Secularise(x, koralle))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) -> Abrade(x, koralle))\nforall x (Isolable(x) -> Secularise(x, koralle))\nforall x (Isolable(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\n\nSecularise(normie, koralle)\n\nforall x (Abrade(x, normie) -> Secularise(x, koralle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The jasmin is unreserved. The jasmin copyread the thorny. The thorny is collateral. If someone is relocated and they see the jasmin then they visit the thorny. If someone is collateral and they see the jasmin then the jasmin is unstudied. If someone copyread the thorny then the thorny copyread the jasmin. If someone is collateral and they see the jasmin then the jasmin copyread the thorny. If someone copyread the thorny then they like the jasmin. If someone is relocated then they see the jasmin. If someone is unreserved then they like the jasmin. If someone is unreserved then they are relocated. The thorny is not relocated.", "logic": "\nUnreserved(jasmin)\nCopyread(jasmin, thorny)\nCollateral(thorny)\nforall x (Relocated(x) and Copyread(x, jasmin) -> Write(x, thorny))\nforall x (Collateral(x) and Copyread(x, jasmin) -> Unstudied(jasmin))\nforall x (Copyread(x, thorny) -> Copyread(thorny, jasmin))\nforall x (Collateral(x) and Copyread(x, jasmin) -> Copyread(jasmin, thorny))\nforall x (Copyread(x, thorny) -> Subtilise(x, jasmin))\nforall x (Relocated(x) -> Copyread(x, jasmin))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) -> Subtilise(x, jasmin))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) -> Relocated(x))\n\nnot Relocated(thorny)\n\nforall x (Unreserved(x) -> Relocated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The slade is antifungal. The slade indurate the kariotta. The kariotta is unfunded. If someone is enraged and they see the slade then they visit the kariotta. If someone is unfunded and they see the slade then the slade is derisive. If someone indurate the kariotta then the kariotta indurate the slade. If someone is unfunded and they see the slade then the slade indurate the kariotta. If someone indurate the kariotta then they like the slade. If someone is enraged then they see the slade. If someone is antifungal then they like the slade. If someone is antifungal then they are enraged. The kariotta is derisive.", "logic": "\nAntifungal(slade)\nIndurate(slade, kariotta)\nUnfunded(kariotta)\nforall x (Enraged(x) and Indurate(x, slade) -> Currycomb(x, kariotta))\nforall x (Unfunded(x) and Indurate(x, slade) -> Derisive(slade))\nforall x (Indurate(x, kariotta) -> Indurate(kariotta, slade))\nforall x (Unfunded(x) and Indurate(x, slade) -> Indurate(slade, kariotta))\nforall x (Indurate(x, kariotta) -> Bespangle(x, slade))\nforall x (Enraged(x) -> Indurate(x, slade))\nforall x (Antifungal(x) -> Bespangle(x, slade))\nforall x (Antifungal(x) -> Enraged(x))\n\nDerisive(kariotta)\n\nDerisive(kariotta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The sara is rumpled. The sara vulgarise the chauncey. The chauncey is numinous. If someone is panoptical and they see the sara then they visit the chauncey. If someone is numinous and they see the sara then the sara is overweight. If someone vulgarise the chauncey then the chauncey vulgarise the sara. If someone is numinous and they see the sara then the sara vulgarise the chauncey. If someone vulgarise the chauncey then they like the sara. If someone is panoptical then they see the sara. If someone is rumpled then they like the sara. If someone is rumpled then they are panoptical. The chauncey does not see the chauncey.", "logic": "\nRumpled(sara)\nVulgarise(sara, chauncey)\nNuminous(chauncey)\nforall x (Panoptical(x) and Vulgarise(x, sara) -> Reenforce(x, chauncey))\nforall x (Numinous(x) and Vulgarise(x, sara) -> Overweight(sara))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, chauncey) -> Vulgarise(chauncey, sara))\nforall x (Numinous(x) and Vulgarise(x, sara) -> Vulgarise(sara, chauncey))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, chauncey) -> Pepper(x, sara))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) -> Vulgarise(x, sara))\nforall x (Rumpled(x) -> Pepper(x, sara))\nforall x (Rumpled(x) -> Panoptical(x))\n\nnot Vulgarise(chauncey, chauncey)\n\nnot Vulgarise(chauncey, chauncey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The zena is trilobate. The zena peptize the wood. The wood is skinless. If someone is chemic and they see the zena then they visit the wood. If someone is skinless and they see the zena then the zena is edentulous. If someone peptize the wood then the wood peptize the zena. If someone is skinless and they see the zena then the zena peptize the wood. If someone peptize the wood then they like the zena. If someone is chemic then they see the zena. If someone is trilobate then they like the zena. If someone is trilobate then they are chemic. The zena is rough.", "logic": "\nTrilobate(zena)\nPeptize(zena, wood)\nSkinless(wood)\nforall x (Chemic(x) and Peptize(x, zena) -> Swallow(x, wood))\nforall x (Skinless(x) and Peptize(x, zena) -> Edentulous(zena))\nforall x (Peptize(x, wood) -> Peptize(wood, zena))\nforall x (Skinless(x) and Peptize(x, zena) -> Peptize(zena, wood))\nforall x (Peptize(x, wood) -> Default(x, zena))\nforall x (Chemic(x) -> Peptize(x, zena))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Default(x, zena))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Chemic(x))\n\nRough(zena)\n\nRough(zena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The kerri is chiasmic. The kerri resile the lanna. The lanna is sovereign. If someone is undoable and they see the kerri then they visit the lanna. If someone is sovereign and they see the kerri then the kerri is lemonlike. If someone resile the lanna then the lanna resile the kerri. If someone is sovereign and they see the kerri then the kerri resile the lanna. If someone resile the lanna then they like the kerri. If someone is undoable then they see the kerri. If someone is chiasmic then they like the kerri. If someone is chiasmic then they are undoable. The kerri does not like the lanna.", "logic": "\nChiasmic(kerri)\nResile(kerri, lanna)\nSovereign(lanna)\nforall x (Undoable(x) and Resile(x, kerri) -> Debar(x, lanna))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Resile(x, kerri) -> Lemonlike(kerri))\nforall x (Resile(x, lanna) -> Resile(lanna, kerri))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Resile(x, kerri) -> Resile(kerri, lanna))\nforall x (Resile(x, lanna) -> Disesteem(x, kerri))\nforall x (Undoable(x) -> Resile(x, kerri))\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Disesteem(x, kerri))\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) -> Undoable(x))\n\nnot Disesteem(kerri, lanna)\n\nnot Disesteem(kerri, lanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "The mari is manichaean. The mari talk the buck. The buck is likable. If someone is equatorial and they see the mari then they visit the buck. If someone is likable and they see the mari then the mari is guinean. If someone talk the buck then the buck talk the mari. If someone is likable and they see the mari then the mari talk the buck. If someone talk the buck then they like the mari. If someone is equatorial then they see the mari. If someone is manichaean then they like the mari. If someone is manichaean then they are equatorial. The mari is likable.", "logic": "\nManichaean(mari)\nTalk(mari, buck)\nLikable(buck)\nforall x (Equatorial(x) and Talk(x, mari) -> Tire(x, buck))\nforall x (Likable(x) and Talk(x, mari) -> Guinean(mari))\nforall x (Talk(x, buck) -> Talk(buck, mari))\nforall x (Likable(x) and Talk(x, mari) -> Talk(mari, buck))\nforall x (Talk(x, buck) -> Bribe(x, mari))\nforall x (Equatorial(x) -> Talk(x, mari))\nforall x (Manichaean(x) -> Bribe(x, mari))\nforall x (Manichaean(x) -> Equatorial(x))\n\nLikable(mari)\n\nLikable(mari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-131"} {"premises": "Querida is not merciful. Querida is barren. Cecil is forehanded. Cecil is not betrothed. Cecil is stabile. Cecil is renewing. Cecil is not barren. Taryn is forehanded. Taryn is merciful. Taryn is humanlike. Taryn is not stabile. Adi is renewing. If something is betrothed and barren then it is stabile. If Taryn is not barren then Taryn is forehanded. If something is barren then it is betrothed. If Taryn is renewing and Taryn is not forehanded then Taryn is not humanlike. All humanlike, stabile things are merciful. All forehanded, stabile things are merciful. All stabile things are not humanlike. If something is merciful and betrothed then it is not humanlike. Taryn is forehanded.", "logic": "\nnot Merciful(querida)\nBarren(querida)\nForehanded(cecil)\nnot Betrothed(cecil)\nStabile(cecil)\nRenewing(cecil)\nnot Barren(cecil)\nForehanded(taryn)\nMerciful(taryn)\nHumanlike(taryn)\nnot Stabile(taryn)\nRenewing(adi)\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and Barren(x) -> Stabile(x))\nnot Barren(taryn) -> Forehanded(taryn)\nforall x (Barren(x) -> Betrothed(x))\nRenewing(taryn) and not Forehanded(taryn) -> not Humanlike(taryn)\nforall x (Humanlike(x) and Stabile(x) -> Merciful(x))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Stabile(x) -> Merciful(x))\nforall x (Stabile(x) -> not Humanlike(x))\nforall x (Merciful(x) and Betrothed(x) -> not Humanlike(x))\n\nForehanded(taryn)\n\ntherefore Forehanded(taryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Lenette is not uttermost. Lenette is amitotic. Son is haematic. Son is not buttonlike. Son is southmost. Son is cheery. Son is not amitotic. Barbra is haematic. Barbra is uttermost. Barbra is florentine. Barbra is not southmost. Swen is cheery. If something is buttonlike and amitotic then it is southmost. If Barbra is not amitotic then Barbra is haematic. If something is amitotic then it is buttonlike. If Barbra is cheery and Barbra is not haematic then Barbra is not florentine. All florentine, southmost things are uttermost. All haematic, southmost things are uttermost. All southmost things are not florentine. If something is uttermost and buttonlike then it is not florentine. Barbra is not haematic.", "logic": "\nnot Uttermost(lenette)\nAmitotic(lenette)\nHaematic(son)\nnot Buttonlike(son)\nSouthmost(son)\nCheery(son)\nnot Amitotic(son)\nHaematic(barbra)\nUttermost(barbra)\nFlorentine(barbra)\nnot Southmost(barbra)\nCheery(swen)\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) and Amitotic(x) -> Southmost(x))\nnot Amitotic(barbra) -> Haematic(barbra)\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nCheery(barbra) and not Haematic(barbra) -> not Florentine(barbra)\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Southmost(x) -> Uttermost(x))\nforall x (Haematic(x) and Southmost(x) -> Uttermost(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> not Florentine(x))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) and Buttonlike(x) -> not Florentine(x))\n\nnot Haematic(barbra)\n\ntherefore Haematic(barbra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Hasty is not hyperfine. Hasty is descendent. Barrett is anuretic. Barrett is not threefold. Barrett is calceiform. Barrett is powdery. Barrett is not descendent. Kissie is anuretic. Kissie is hyperfine. Kissie is male. Kissie is not calceiform. Maud is powdery. If something is threefold and descendent then it is calceiform. If Kissie is not descendent then Kissie is anuretic. If something is descendent then it is threefold. If Kissie is powdery and Kissie is not anuretic then Kissie is not male. All male, calceiform things are hyperfine. All anuretic, calceiform things are hyperfine. All calceiform things are not male. If something is hyperfine and threefold then it is not male. Barrett is hyperfine.", "logic": "\nnot Hyperfine(hasty)\nDescendent(hasty)\nAnuretic(barrett)\nnot Threefold(barrett)\nCalceiform(barrett)\nPowdery(barrett)\nnot Descendent(barrett)\nAnuretic(kissie)\nHyperfine(kissie)\nMale(kissie)\nnot Calceiform(kissie)\nPowdery(maud)\nforall x (Threefold(x) and Descendent(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nnot Descendent(kissie) -> Anuretic(kissie)\nforall x (Descendent(x) -> Threefold(x))\nPowdery(kissie) and not Anuretic(kissie) -> not Male(kissie)\nforall x (Male(x) and Calceiform(x) -> Hyperfine(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) and Calceiform(x) -> Hyperfine(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> not Male(x))\nforall x (Hyperfine(x) and Threefold(x) -> not Male(x))\n\nHyperfine(barrett)\n\nAnuretic(barrett) and Calceiform(barrett) and forall x (Anuretic(x) and Calceiform(x) -> Hyperfine(x)) -> therefore Hyperfine(barrett)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Manish is not immunized. Manish is loosened. Ferne is masterful. Ferne is not collected. Ferne is crocketed. Ferne is reanimated. Ferne is not loosened. Eyde is masterful. Eyde is immunized. Eyde is slanted. Eyde is not crocketed. Ranice is reanimated. If something is collected and loosened then it is crocketed. If Eyde is not loosened then Eyde is masterful. If something is loosened then it is collected. If Eyde is reanimated and Eyde is not masterful then Eyde is not slanted. All slanted, crocketed things are immunized. All masterful, crocketed things are immunized. All crocketed things are not slanted. If something is immunized and collected then it is not slanted. Manish is not collected.", "logic": "\nnot Immunized(manish)\nLoosened(manish)\nMasterful(ferne)\nnot Collected(ferne)\nCrocketed(ferne)\nReanimated(ferne)\nnot Loosened(ferne)\nMasterful(eyde)\nImmunized(eyde)\nSlanted(eyde)\nnot Crocketed(eyde)\nReanimated(ranice)\nforall x (Collected(x) and Loosened(x) -> Crocketed(x))\nnot Loosened(eyde) -> Masterful(eyde)\nforall x (Loosened(x) -> Collected(x))\nReanimated(eyde) and not Masterful(eyde) -> not Slanted(eyde)\nforall x (Slanted(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Immunized(x))\nforall x (Masterful(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Immunized(x))\nforall x (Crocketed(x) -> not Slanted(x))\nforall x (Immunized(x) and Collected(x) -> not Slanted(x))\n\nnot Collected(manish)\n\nLoosened(manish) and forall x (Loosened(x) -> Collected(x)) -> therefore Collected(manish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Esme is not sotho. Esme is causal. Rodolphe is larboard. Rodolphe is not hierarchic. Rodolphe is mouselike. Rodolphe is outrageous. Rodolphe is not causal. Weidar is larboard. Weidar is sotho. Weidar is titillated. Weidar is not mouselike. Meridith is outrageous. If something is hierarchic and causal then it is mouselike. If Weidar is not causal then Weidar is larboard. If something is causal then it is hierarchic. If Weidar is outrageous and Weidar is not larboard then Weidar is not titillated. All titillated, mouselike things are sotho. All larboard, mouselike things are sotho. All mouselike things are not titillated. If something is sotho and hierarchic then it is not titillated. Esme is mouselike.", "logic": "\nnot Sotho(esme)\nCausal(esme)\nLarboard(rodolphe)\nnot Hierarchic(rodolphe)\nMouselike(rodolphe)\nOutrageous(rodolphe)\nnot Causal(rodolphe)\nLarboard(weidar)\nSotho(weidar)\nTitillated(weidar)\nnot Mouselike(weidar)\nOutrageous(meridith)\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Causal(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nnot Causal(weidar) -> Larboard(weidar)\nforall x (Causal(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\nOutrageous(weidar) and not Larboard(weidar) -> not Titillated(weidar)\nforall x (Titillated(x) and Mouselike(x) -> Sotho(x))\nforall x (Larboard(x) and Mouselike(x) -> Sotho(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> not Titillated(x))\nforall x (Sotho(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> not Titillated(x))\n\nMouselike(esme)\n\nCausal(esme) and forall x (Causal(x) -> Hierarchic(x)) -> therefore Hierarchic(esme) Hierarchic(esme) and Causal(esme) and forall x (Hierarchic(x) and Causal(x) -> Mouselike(x)) -> therefore Mouselike(esme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Damien is not padded. Damien is roaring. Jelene is neurogenic. Jelene is not acetous. Jelene is clownlike. Jelene is excursive. Jelene is not roaring. Sande is neurogenic. Sande is padded. Sande is pyloric. Sande is not clownlike. Temp is excursive. If something is acetous and roaring then it is clownlike. If Sande is not roaring then Sande is neurogenic. If something is roaring then it is acetous. If Sande is excursive and Sande is not neurogenic then Sande is not pyloric. All pyloric, clownlike things are padded. All neurogenic, clownlike things are padded. All clownlike things are not pyloric. If something is padded and acetous then it is not pyloric. Damien is not clownlike.", "logic": "\nnot Padded(damien)\nRoaring(damien)\nNeurogenic(jelene)\nnot Acetous(jelene)\nClownlike(jelene)\nExcursive(jelene)\nnot Roaring(jelene)\nNeurogenic(sande)\nPadded(sande)\nPyloric(sande)\nnot Clownlike(sande)\nExcursive(temp)\nforall x (Acetous(x) and Roaring(x) -> Clownlike(x))\nnot Roaring(sande) -> Neurogenic(sande)\nforall x (Roaring(x) -> Acetous(x))\nExcursive(sande) and not Neurogenic(sande) -> not Pyloric(sande)\nforall x (Pyloric(x) and Clownlike(x) -> Padded(x))\nforall x (Neurogenic(x) and Clownlike(x) -> Padded(x))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) -> not Pyloric(x))\nforall x (Padded(x) and Acetous(x) -> not Pyloric(x))\n\nnot Clownlike(damien)\n\nRoaring(damien) and forall x (Roaring(x) -> Acetous(x)) -> therefore Acetous(damien) Acetous(damien) and Roaring(damien) and forall x (Acetous(x) and Roaring(x) -> Clownlike(x)) -> therefore Clownlike(damien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Pierette is not disgraced. Pierette is uricosuric. Shantee is belarusian. Shantee is not populated. Shantee is enormous. Shantee is minor. Shantee is not uricosuric. Quentin is belarusian. Quentin is disgraced. Quentin is nonhairy. Quentin is not enormous. Linus is minor. If something is populated and uricosuric then it is enormous. If Quentin is not uricosuric then Quentin is belarusian. If something is uricosuric then it is populated. If Quentin is minor and Quentin is not belarusian then Quentin is not nonhairy. All nonhairy, enormous things are disgraced. All belarusian, enormous things are disgraced. All enormous things are not nonhairy. If something is disgraced and populated then it is not nonhairy. Pierette is not nonhairy.", "logic": "\nnot Disgraced(pierette)\nUricosuric(pierette)\nBelarusian(shantee)\nnot Populated(shantee)\nEnormous(shantee)\nMinor(shantee)\nnot Uricosuric(shantee)\nBelarusian(quentin)\nDisgraced(quentin)\nNonhairy(quentin)\nnot Enormous(quentin)\nMinor(linus)\nforall x (Populated(x) and Uricosuric(x) -> Enormous(x))\nnot Uricosuric(quentin) -> Belarusian(quentin)\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Populated(x))\nMinor(quentin) and not Belarusian(quentin) -> not Nonhairy(quentin)\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) and Enormous(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Belarusian(x) and Enormous(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Enormous(x) -> not Nonhairy(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) and Populated(x) -> not Nonhairy(x))\n\nnot Nonhairy(pierette)\n\nUricosuric(pierette) and forall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Populated(x)) -> therefore Populated(pierette) Populated(pierette) and Uricosuric(pierette) and forall x (Populated(x) and Uricosuric(x) -> Enormous(x)) -> therefore Enormous(pierette) Enormous(pierette) and forall x (Enormous(x) -> not Nonhairy(x)) -> therefore not Nonhairy(pierette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Thorstein is not rattled. Thorstein is friendly. Dwane is intoned. Dwane is not unawed. Dwane is tiled. Dwane is venial. Dwane is not friendly. Albertina is intoned. Albertina is rattled. Albertina is diacritic. Albertina is not tiled. Meridith is venial. If something is unawed and friendly then it is tiled. If Albertina is not friendly then Albertina is intoned. If something is friendly then it is unawed. If Albertina is venial and Albertina is not intoned then Albertina is not diacritic. All diacritic, tiled things are rattled. All intoned, tiled things are rattled. All tiled things are not diacritic. If something is rattled and unawed then it is not diacritic. Thorstein is diacritic.", "logic": "\nnot Rattled(thorstein)\nFriendly(thorstein)\nIntoned(dwane)\nnot Unawed(dwane)\nTiled(dwane)\nVenial(dwane)\nnot Friendly(dwane)\nIntoned(albertina)\nRattled(albertina)\nDiacritic(albertina)\nnot Tiled(albertina)\nVenial(meridith)\nforall x (Unawed(x) and Friendly(x) -> Tiled(x))\nnot Friendly(albertina) -> Intoned(albertina)\nforall x (Friendly(x) -> Unawed(x))\nVenial(albertina) and not Intoned(albertina) -> not Diacritic(albertina)\nforall x (Diacritic(x) and Tiled(x) -> Rattled(x))\nforall x (Intoned(x) and Tiled(x) -> Rattled(x))\nforall x (Tiled(x) -> not Diacritic(x))\nforall x (Rattled(x) and Unawed(x) -> not Diacritic(x))\n\nDiacritic(thorstein)\n\nFriendly(thorstein) and forall x (Friendly(x) -> Unawed(x)) -> therefore Unawed(thorstein) Unawed(thorstein) and Friendly(thorstein) and forall x (Unawed(x) and Friendly(x) -> Tiled(x)) -> therefore Tiled(thorstein) Tiled(thorstein) and forall x (Tiled(x) -> not Diacritic(x)) -> therefore not Diacritic(thorstein)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Joe is not slavish. Joe is geodesic. Sheila is coseismal. Sheila is not fooling. Sheila is reflective. Sheila is epideictic. Sheila is not geodesic. Nesta is coseismal. Nesta is slavish. Nesta is regnant. Nesta is not reflective. Elton is epideictic. If something is fooling and geodesic then it is reflective. If Nesta is not geodesic then Nesta is coseismal. If something is geodesic then it is fooling. If Nesta is epideictic and Nesta is not coseismal then Nesta is not regnant. All regnant, reflective things are slavish. All coseismal, reflective things are slavish. All reflective things are not regnant. If something is slavish and fooling then it is not regnant. Elton is not slavish.", "logic": "\nnot Slavish(joe)\nGeodesic(joe)\nCoseismal(sheila)\nnot Fooling(sheila)\nReflective(sheila)\nEpideictic(sheila)\nnot Geodesic(sheila)\nCoseismal(nesta)\nSlavish(nesta)\nRegnant(nesta)\nnot Reflective(nesta)\nEpideictic(elton)\nforall x (Fooling(x) and Geodesic(x) -> Reflective(x))\nnot Geodesic(nesta) -> Coseismal(nesta)\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Fooling(x))\nEpideictic(nesta) and not Coseismal(nesta) -> not Regnant(nesta)\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Reflective(x) -> Slavish(x))\nforall x (Coseismal(x) and Reflective(x) -> Slavish(x))\nforall x (Reflective(x) -> not Regnant(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Fooling(x) -> not Regnant(x))\n\nnot Slavish(elton)\n\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Reflective(x) -> Slavish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Bethina is not amenable. Bethina is textile. Catherine is inadequate. Catherine is not germane. Catherine is hepatic. Catherine is convincing. Catherine is not textile. Norrie is inadequate. Norrie is amenable. Norrie is quenched. Norrie is not hepatic. Melva is convincing. If something is germane and textile then it is hepatic. If Norrie is not textile then Norrie is inadequate. If something is textile then it is germane. If Norrie is convincing and Norrie is not inadequate then Norrie is not quenched. All quenched, hepatic things are amenable. All inadequate, hepatic things are amenable. All hepatic things are not quenched. If something is amenable and germane then it is not quenched. Melva is hepatic.", "logic": "\nnot Amenable(bethina)\nTextile(bethina)\nInadequate(catherine)\nnot Germane(catherine)\nHepatic(catherine)\nConvincing(catherine)\nnot Textile(catherine)\nInadequate(norrie)\nAmenable(norrie)\nQuenched(norrie)\nnot Hepatic(norrie)\nConvincing(melva)\nforall x (Germane(x) and Textile(x) -> Hepatic(x))\nnot Textile(norrie) -> Inadequate(norrie)\nforall x (Textile(x) -> Germane(x))\nConvincing(norrie) and not Inadequate(norrie) -> not Quenched(norrie)\nforall x (Quenched(x) and Hepatic(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Inadequate(x) and Hepatic(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Hepatic(x) -> not Quenched(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) and Germane(x) -> not Quenched(x))\n\nHepatic(melva)\n\nforall x (Germane(x) and Textile(x) -> Hepatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Yettie is not central. Yettie is sear. Agnes is rabbinical. Agnes is not uncheerful. Agnes is buckshee. Agnes is laden. Agnes is not sear. Catherina is rabbinical. Catherina is central. Catherina is levitical. Catherina is not buckshee. Julee is laden. If something is uncheerful and sear then it is buckshee. If Catherina is not sear then Catherina is rabbinical. If something is sear then it is uncheerful. If Catherina is laden and Catherina is not rabbinical then Catherina is not levitical. All levitical, buckshee things are central. All rabbinical, buckshee things are central. All buckshee things are not levitical. If something is central and uncheerful then it is not levitical. Julee is not uncheerful.", "logic": "\nnot Central(yettie)\nSear(yettie)\nRabbinical(agnes)\nnot Uncheerful(agnes)\nBuckshee(agnes)\nLaden(agnes)\nnot Sear(agnes)\nRabbinical(catherina)\nCentral(catherina)\nLevitical(catherina)\nnot Buckshee(catherina)\nLaden(julee)\nforall x (Uncheerful(x) and Sear(x) -> Buckshee(x))\nnot Sear(catherina) -> Rabbinical(catherina)\nforall x (Sear(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\nLaden(catherina) and not Rabbinical(catherina) -> not Levitical(catherina)\nforall x (Levitical(x) and Buckshee(x) -> Central(x))\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) and Buckshee(x) -> Central(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) -> not Levitical(x))\nforall x (Central(x) and Uncheerful(x) -> not Levitical(x))\n\nnot Uncheerful(julee)\n\nforall x (Sear(x) -> Uncheerful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Orion is not boylike. Orion is bookish. Reube is clarifying. Reube is not libertine. Reube is patterned. Reube is dour. Reube is not bookish. Kerry is clarifying. Kerry is boylike. Kerry is prefrontal. Kerry is not patterned. Garvey is dour. If something is libertine and bookish then it is patterned. If Kerry is not bookish then Kerry is clarifying. If something is bookish then it is libertine. If Kerry is dour and Kerry is not clarifying then Kerry is not prefrontal. All prefrontal, patterned things are boylike. All clarifying, patterned things are boylike. All patterned things are not prefrontal. If something is boylike and libertine then it is not prefrontal. Kerry is libertine.", "logic": "\nnot Boylike(orion)\nBookish(orion)\nClarifying(reube)\nnot Libertine(reube)\nPatterned(reube)\nDour(reube)\nnot Bookish(reube)\nClarifying(kerry)\nBoylike(kerry)\nPrefrontal(kerry)\nnot Patterned(kerry)\nDour(garvey)\nforall x (Libertine(x) and Bookish(x) -> Patterned(x))\nnot Bookish(kerry) -> Clarifying(kerry)\nforall x (Bookish(x) -> Libertine(x))\nDour(kerry) and not Clarifying(kerry) -> not Prefrontal(kerry)\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) and Patterned(x) -> Boylike(x))\nforall x (Clarifying(x) and Patterned(x) -> Boylike(x))\nforall x (Patterned(x) -> not Prefrontal(x))\nforall x (Boylike(x) and Libertine(x) -> not Prefrontal(x))\n\nLibertine(kerry)\n\nforall x (Bookish(x) -> Libertine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Gigi is not sylvan. Gigi is wifelike. Heda is gonzo. Heda is not deranged. Heda is unorthodox. Heda is bivalve. Heda is not wifelike. Elsey is gonzo. Elsey is sylvan. Elsey is undefined. Elsey is not unorthodox. Stefania is bivalve. If something is deranged and wifelike then it is unorthodox. If Elsey is not wifelike then Elsey is gonzo. If something is wifelike then it is deranged. If Elsey is bivalve and Elsey is not gonzo then Elsey is not undefined. All undefined, unorthodox things are sylvan. All gonzo, unorthodox things are sylvan. All unorthodox things are not undefined. If something is sylvan and deranged then it is not undefined. Gigi is not bivalve.", "logic": "\nnot Sylvan(gigi)\nWifelike(gigi)\nGonzo(heda)\nnot Deranged(heda)\nUnorthodox(heda)\nBivalve(heda)\nnot Wifelike(heda)\nGonzo(elsey)\nSylvan(elsey)\nUndefined(elsey)\nnot Unorthodox(elsey)\nBivalve(stefania)\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Wifelike(x) -> Unorthodox(x))\nnot Wifelike(elsey) -> Gonzo(elsey)\nforall x (Wifelike(x) -> Deranged(x))\nBivalve(elsey) and not Gonzo(elsey) -> not Undefined(elsey)\nforall x (Undefined(x) and Unorthodox(x) -> Sylvan(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) and Unorthodox(x) -> Sylvan(x))\nforall x (Unorthodox(x) -> not Undefined(x))\nforall x (Sylvan(x) and Deranged(x) -> not Undefined(x))\n\nnot Bivalve(gigi)\n\nnot Bivalve(gigi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Haley is not conceptual. Haley is toupeed. Brent is tarry. Brent is not chronic. Brent is nubile. Brent is extravert. Brent is not toupeed. Alix is tarry. Alix is conceptual. Alix is sourish. Alix is not nubile. Avrit is extravert. If something is chronic and toupeed then it is nubile. If Alix is not toupeed then Alix is tarry. If something is toupeed then it is chronic. If Alix is extravert and Alix is not tarry then Alix is not sourish. All sourish, nubile things are conceptual. All tarry, nubile things are conceptual. All nubile things are not sourish. If something is conceptual and chronic then it is not sourish. Alix is extravert.", "logic": "\nnot Conceptual(haley)\nToupeed(haley)\nTarry(brent)\nnot Chronic(brent)\nNubile(brent)\nExtravert(brent)\nnot Toupeed(brent)\nTarry(alix)\nConceptual(alix)\nSourish(alix)\nnot Nubile(alix)\nExtravert(avrit)\nforall x (Chronic(x) and Toupeed(x) -> Nubile(x))\nnot Toupeed(alix) -> Tarry(alix)\nforall x (Toupeed(x) -> Chronic(x))\nExtravert(alix) and not Tarry(alix) -> not Sourish(alix)\nforall x (Sourish(x) and Nubile(x) -> Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Tarry(x) and Nubile(x) -> Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> not Sourish(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) and Chronic(x) -> not Sourish(x))\n\nExtravert(alix)\n\nExtravert(alix) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Colly is not sidelong. Colly is bistered. Randee is mundane. Randee is not springless. Randee is absorptive. Randee is vegetative. Randee is not bistered. Mason is mundane. Mason is sidelong. Mason is lacerated. Mason is not absorptive. Dulcia is vegetative. If something is springless and bistered then it is absorptive. If Mason is not bistered then Mason is mundane. If something is bistered then it is springless. If Mason is vegetative and Mason is not mundane then Mason is not lacerated. All lacerated, absorptive things are sidelong. All mundane, absorptive things are sidelong. All absorptive things are not lacerated. If something is sidelong and springless then it is not lacerated. Dulcia is not mundane.", "logic": "\nnot Sidelong(colly)\nBistered(colly)\nMundane(randee)\nnot Springless(randee)\nAbsorptive(randee)\nVegetative(randee)\nnot Bistered(randee)\nMundane(mason)\nSidelong(mason)\nLacerated(mason)\nnot Absorptive(mason)\nVegetative(dulcia)\nforall x (Springless(x) and Bistered(x) -> Absorptive(x))\nnot Bistered(mason) -> Mundane(mason)\nforall x (Bistered(x) -> Springless(x))\nVegetative(mason) and not Mundane(mason) -> not Lacerated(mason)\nforall x (Lacerated(x) and Absorptive(x) -> Sidelong(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) and Absorptive(x) -> Sidelong(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) -> not Lacerated(x))\nforall x (Sidelong(x) and Springless(x) -> not Lacerated(x))\n\nnot Mundane(dulcia)\n\nnot Mundane(dulcia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Matthias is not tilled. Matthias is aphasic. Cory is varnished. Cory is not unchaste. Cory is toiling. Cory is flowing. Cory is not aphasic. Daniela is varnished. Daniela is tilled. Daniela is showy. Daniela is not toiling. Dixie is flowing. If something is unchaste and aphasic then it is toiling. If Daniela is not aphasic then Daniela is varnished. If something is aphasic then it is unchaste. If Daniela is flowing and Daniela is not varnished then Daniela is not showy. All showy, toiling things are tilled. All varnished, toiling things are tilled. All toiling things are not showy. If something is tilled and unchaste then it is not showy. Matthias is varnished.", "logic": "\nnot Tilled(matthias)\nAphasic(matthias)\nVarnished(cory)\nnot Unchaste(cory)\nToiling(cory)\nFlowing(cory)\nnot Aphasic(cory)\nVarnished(daniela)\nTilled(daniela)\nShowy(daniela)\nnot Toiling(daniela)\nFlowing(dixie)\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Aphasic(x) -> Toiling(x))\nnot Aphasic(daniela) -> Varnished(daniela)\nforall x (Aphasic(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nFlowing(daniela) and not Varnished(daniela) -> not Showy(daniela)\nforall x (Showy(x) and Toiling(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Varnished(x) and Toiling(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) -> not Showy(x))\nforall x (Tilled(x) and Unchaste(x) -> not Showy(x))\n\nVarnished(matthias)\n\nVarnished(matthias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1692"} {"premises": "Ervin is silenced. Ervin is slithering. Ervin is pricey. If Ervin is silenced and Ervin is pricey then Ervin is not amatory. Ervin is slithering.", "logic": "\nSilenced(ervin)\nSlithering(ervin)\nPricey(ervin)\nSilenced(ervin) and Pricey(ervin) -> not Amatory(ervin)\n\nSlithering(ervin)\n\ntherefore Slithering(ervin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-975"} {"premises": "Darleen is ramous. Darleen is binaural. Darleen is abortive. If Darleen is ramous and Darleen is abortive then Darleen is not unhealthy. Darleen is not binaural.", "logic": "\nRamous(darleen)\nBinaural(darleen)\nAbortive(darleen)\nRamous(darleen) and Abortive(darleen) -> not Unhealthy(darleen)\n\nnot Binaural(darleen)\n\ntherefore Binaural(darleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-975"} {"premises": "Trixy is triune. Trixy is ruminant. Trixy is living. If Trixy is triune and Trixy is living then Trixy is not limiting. Trixy is not limiting.", "logic": "\nTriune(trixy)\nRuminant(trixy)\nLiving(trixy)\nTriune(trixy) and Living(trixy) -> not Limiting(trixy)\n\nnot Limiting(trixy)\n\nTriune(trixy) and Living(trixy) and Triune(trixy) and Living(trixy) -> not Limiting(trixy) -> therefore not Limiting(trixy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-975"} {"premises": "Tynan is solvable. Tynan is biovular. Tynan is scenic. If Tynan is solvable and Tynan is scenic then Tynan is not uneatable. Tynan is uneatable.", "logic": "\nSolvable(tynan)\nBiovular(tynan)\nScenic(tynan)\nSolvable(tynan) and Scenic(tynan) -> not Uneatable(tynan)\n\nUneatable(tynan)\n\nSolvable(tynan) and Scenic(tynan) and Solvable(tynan) and Scenic(tynan) -> not Uneatable(tynan) -> therefore not Uneatable(tynan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-975"} {"premises": "Lucian is incitive. Lucian is upscale. Lucian is stemmatic. If Lucian is incitive and Lucian is stemmatic then Lucian is not toeless. Lucian is not blue.", "logic": "\nIncitive(lucian)\nUpscale(lucian)\nStemmatic(lucian)\nIncitive(lucian) and Stemmatic(lucian) -> not Toeless(lucian)\n\nnot Blue(lucian)\n\nnot Blue(lucian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-975"} {"premises": "Aloysia is stannic. Aloysia is rush. Aloysia is unpleasing. If Aloysia is stannic and Aloysia is unpleasing then Aloysia is not strict. Aloysia is smart.", "logic": "\nStannic(aloysia)\nRush(aloysia)\nUnpleasing(aloysia)\nStannic(aloysia) and Unpleasing(aloysia) -> not Strict(aloysia)\n\nSmart(aloysia)\n\nSmart(aloysia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-975"} {"premises": "The kerstin piddle the wyatt. The kerstin is mated. The kerstin is not plumlike. The kerstin pour the wyatt. The wyatt does not chase the kerstin. The wyatt is not regnant. The wyatt is not mated. The wyatt is not plumlike. The wyatt pour the kerstin. The wyatt does not need the kerstin. If the wyatt piddle the kerstin then the wyatt does not like the kerstin. If someone pour the wyatt then they need the kerstin. If someone piddle the wyatt and the wyatt does not chase the kerstin then the wyatt does not need the kerstin. If someone incurvate the wyatt and the wyatt piddle the kerstin then they chase the wyatt. If someone incurvate the kerstin and they do not like the wyatt then the kerstin incurvate the wyatt. If someone incurvate the kerstin and they like the kerstin then they are not mated. The wyatt is not plumlike.", "logic": "\nPiddle(kerstin, wyatt)\nMated(kerstin)\nnot Plumlike(kerstin)\nPour(kerstin, wyatt)\nnot Piddle(wyatt, kerstin)\nnot Regnant(wyatt)\nnot Mated(wyatt)\nnot Plumlike(wyatt)\nPour(wyatt, kerstin)\nnot Incurvate(wyatt, kerstin)\nPiddle(wyatt, kerstin) -> not Pour(wyatt, kerstin)\nforall x (Pour(x, wyatt) -> Incurvate(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Piddle(x, wyatt) and not Piddle(wyatt, kerstin) -> not Incurvate(wyatt, kerstin))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, wyatt) and Piddle(wyatt, kerstin) -> Piddle(x, wyatt))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, kerstin) and not Pour(x, wyatt) -> Incurvate(kerstin, wyatt))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, kerstin) and Pour(x, kerstin) -> not Mated(x))\n\nnot Plumlike(wyatt)\n\ntherefore not Plumlike(wyatt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The elisabet partner the aurore. The elisabet is loveable. The elisabet is not mawkish. The elisabet desire the aurore. The aurore does not chase the elisabet. The aurore is not laryngeal. The aurore is not loveable. The aurore is not mawkish. The aurore desire the elisabet. The aurore does not need the elisabet. If the aurore partner the elisabet then the aurore does not like the elisabet. If someone desire the aurore then they need the elisabet. If someone partner the aurore and the aurore does not chase the elisabet then the aurore does not need the elisabet. If someone dismiss the aurore and the aurore partner the elisabet then they chase the aurore. If someone dismiss the elisabet and they do not like the aurore then the elisabet dismiss the aurore. If someone dismiss the elisabet and they like the elisabet then they are not loveable. The elisabet is mawkish.", "logic": "\nPartner(elisabet, aurore)\nLoveable(elisabet)\nnot Mawkish(elisabet)\nDesire(elisabet, aurore)\nnot Partner(aurore, elisabet)\nnot Laryngeal(aurore)\nnot Loveable(aurore)\nnot Mawkish(aurore)\nDesire(aurore, elisabet)\nnot Dismiss(aurore, elisabet)\nPartner(aurore, elisabet) -> not Desire(aurore, elisabet)\nforall x (Desire(x, aurore) -> Dismiss(x, elisabet))\nforall x (Partner(x, aurore) and not Partner(aurore, elisabet) -> not Dismiss(aurore, elisabet))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, aurore) and Partner(aurore, elisabet) -> Partner(x, aurore))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, elisabet) and not Desire(x, aurore) -> Dismiss(elisabet, aurore))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, elisabet) and Desire(x, elisabet) -> not Loveable(x))\n\nMawkish(elisabet)\n\ntherefore not Mawkish(elisabet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The elias purge the lauree. The elias is docile. The elias is not xxiii. The elias spoof the lauree. The lauree does not chase the elias. The lauree is not hirsute. The lauree is not docile. The lauree is not xxiii. The lauree spoof the elias. The lauree does not need the elias. If the lauree purge the elias then the lauree does not like the elias. If someone spoof the lauree then they need the elias. If someone purge the lauree and the lauree does not chase the elias then the lauree does not need the elias. If someone misally the lauree and the lauree purge the elias then they chase the lauree. If someone misally the elias and they do not like the lauree then the elias misally the lauree. If someone misally the elias and they like the elias then they are not docile. The elias misally the elias.", "logic": "\nPurge(elias, lauree)\nDocile(elias)\nnot Xxiii(elias)\nSpoof(elias, lauree)\nnot Purge(lauree, elias)\nnot Hirsute(lauree)\nnot Docile(lauree)\nnot Xxiii(lauree)\nSpoof(lauree, elias)\nnot Misally(lauree, elias)\nPurge(lauree, elias) -> not Spoof(lauree, elias)\nforall x (Spoof(x, lauree) -> Misally(x, elias))\nforall x (Purge(x, lauree) and not Purge(lauree, elias) -> not Misally(lauree, elias))\nforall x (Misally(x, lauree) and Purge(lauree, elias) -> Purge(x, lauree))\nforall x (Misally(x, elias) and not Spoof(x, lauree) -> Misally(elias, lauree))\nforall x (Misally(x, elias) and Spoof(x, elias) -> not Docile(x))\n\nMisally(elias, elias)\n\nSpoof(elias, lauree) and forall x (Spoof(x, lauree) -> Misally(x, elias)) -> therefore Misally(elias, elias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The lucretia singe the dominick. The lucretia is unfeeling. The lucretia is not theistical. The lucretia apostatise the dominick. The dominick does not chase the lucretia. The dominick is not ordinal. The dominick is not unfeeling. The dominick is not theistical. The dominick apostatise the lucretia. The dominick does not need the lucretia. If the dominick singe the lucretia then the dominick does not like the lucretia. If someone apostatise the dominick then they need the lucretia. If someone singe the dominick and the dominick does not chase the lucretia then the dominick does not need the lucretia. If someone regress the dominick and the dominick singe the lucretia then they chase the dominick. If someone regress the lucretia and they do not like the dominick then the lucretia regress the dominick. If someone regress the lucretia and they like the lucretia then they are not unfeeling. The lucretia does not need the lucretia.", "logic": "\nSinge(lucretia, dominick)\nUnfeeling(lucretia)\nnot Theistical(lucretia)\nApostatise(lucretia, dominick)\nnot Singe(dominick, lucretia)\nnot Ordinal(dominick)\nnot Unfeeling(dominick)\nnot Theistical(dominick)\nApostatise(dominick, lucretia)\nnot Regress(dominick, lucretia)\nSinge(dominick, lucretia) -> not Apostatise(dominick, lucretia)\nforall x (Apostatise(x, dominick) -> Regress(x, lucretia))\nforall x (Singe(x, dominick) and not Singe(dominick, lucretia) -> not Regress(dominick, lucretia))\nforall x (Regress(x, dominick) and Singe(dominick, lucretia) -> Singe(x, dominick))\nforall x (Regress(x, lucretia) and not Apostatise(x, dominick) -> Regress(lucretia, dominick))\nforall x (Regress(x, lucretia) and Apostatise(x, lucretia) -> not Unfeeling(x))\n\nnot Regress(lucretia, lucretia)\n\nApostatise(lucretia, dominick) and forall x (Apostatise(x, dominick) -> Regress(x, lucretia)) -> therefore Regress(lucretia, lucretia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The giordano trifurcate the nicoli. The giordano is impure. The giordano is not hindi. The giordano manicure the nicoli. The nicoli does not chase the giordano. The nicoli is not hindi. The nicoli is not impure. The nicoli is not hindi. The nicoli manicure the giordano. The nicoli does not need the giordano. If the nicoli trifurcate the giordano then the nicoli does not like the giordano. If someone manicure the nicoli then they need the giordano. If someone trifurcate the nicoli and the nicoli does not chase the giordano then the nicoli does not need the giordano. If someone predigest the nicoli and the nicoli trifurcate the giordano then they chase the nicoli. If someone predigest the giordano and they do not like the nicoli then the giordano predigest the nicoli. If someone predigest the giordano and they like the giordano then they are not impure. The giordano does not need the nicoli.", "logic": "\nTrifurcate(giordano, nicoli)\nImpure(giordano)\nnot Hindi(giordano)\nManicure(giordano, nicoli)\nnot Trifurcate(nicoli, giordano)\nnot Hindi(nicoli)\nnot Impure(nicoli)\nnot Hindi(nicoli)\nManicure(nicoli, giordano)\nnot Predigest(nicoli, giordano)\nTrifurcate(nicoli, giordano) -> not Manicure(nicoli, giordano)\nforall x (Manicure(x, nicoli) -> Predigest(x, giordano))\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, nicoli) and not Trifurcate(nicoli, giordano) -> not Predigest(nicoli, giordano))\nforall x (Predigest(x, nicoli) and Trifurcate(nicoli, giordano) -> Trifurcate(x, nicoli))\nforall x (Predigest(x, giordano) and not Manicure(x, nicoli) -> Predigest(giordano, nicoli))\nforall x (Predigest(x, giordano) and Manicure(x, giordano) -> not Impure(x))\n\nnot Predigest(giordano, nicoli)\n\nforall x (Predigest(x, giordano) and not Manicure(x, nicoli) -> Predigest(giordano, nicoli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The skippy reinstall the rose. The skippy is advisory. The skippy is not tubeless. The skippy concur the rose. The rose does not chase the skippy. The rose is not lucifugous. The rose is not advisory. The rose is not tubeless. The rose concur the skippy. The rose does not need the skippy. If the rose reinstall the skippy then the rose does not like the skippy. If someone concur the rose then they need the skippy. If someone reinstall the rose and the rose does not chase the skippy then the rose does not need the skippy. If someone release the rose and the rose reinstall the skippy then they chase the rose. If someone release the skippy and they do not like the rose then the skippy release the rose. If someone release the skippy and they like the skippy then they are not advisory. The rose reinstall the rose.", "logic": "\nReinstall(skippy, rose)\nAdvisory(skippy)\nnot Tubeless(skippy)\nConcur(skippy, rose)\nnot Reinstall(rose, skippy)\nnot Lucifugous(rose)\nnot Advisory(rose)\nnot Tubeless(rose)\nConcur(rose, skippy)\nnot Release(rose, skippy)\nReinstall(rose, skippy) -> not Concur(rose, skippy)\nforall x (Concur(x, rose) -> Release(x, skippy))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, rose) and not Reinstall(rose, skippy) -> not Release(rose, skippy))\nforall x (Release(x, rose) and Reinstall(rose, skippy) -> Reinstall(x, rose))\nforall x (Release(x, skippy) and not Concur(x, rose) -> Release(skippy, rose))\nforall x (Release(x, skippy) and Concur(x, skippy) -> not Advisory(x))\n\nReinstall(rose, rose)\n\nforall x (Release(x, rose) and Reinstall(rose, skippy) -> Reinstall(x, rose)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The solly pasture the eloisa. The solly is patterned. The solly is not landlocked. The solly attach the eloisa. The eloisa does not chase the solly. The eloisa is not limited. The eloisa is not patterned. The eloisa is not landlocked. The eloisa attach the solly. The eloisa does not need the solly. If the eloisa pasture the solly then the eloisa does not like the solly. If someone attach the eloisa then they need the solly. If someone pasture the eloisa and the eloisa does not chase the solly then the eloisa does not need the solly. If someone dummy the eloisa and the eloisa pasture the solly then they chase the eloisa. If someone dummy the solly and they do not like the eloisa then the solly dummy the eloisa. If someone dummy the solly and they like the solly then they are not patterned. The eloisa does not like the eloisa.", "logic": "\nPasture(solly, eloisa)\nPatterned(solly)\nnot Landlocked(solly)\nAttach(solly, eloisa)\nnot Pasture(eloisa, solly)\nnot Limited(eloisa)\nnot Patterned(eloisa)\nnot Landlocked(eloisa)\nAttach(eloisa, solly)\nnot Dummy(eloisa, solly)\nPasture(eloisa, solly) -> not Attach(eloisa, solly)\nforall x (Attach(x, eloisa) -> Dummy(x, solly))\nforall x (Pasture(x, eloisa) and not Pasture(eloisa, solly) -> not Dummy(eloisa, solly))\nforall x (Dummy(x, eloisa) and Pasture(eloisa, solly) -> Pasture(x, eloisa))\nforall x (Dummy(x, solly) and not Attach(x, eloisa) -> Dummy(solly, eloisa))\nforall x (Dummy(x, solly) and Attach(x, solly) -> not Patterned(x))\n\nnot Attach(eloisa, eloisa)\n\nnot Attach(eloisa, eloisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "The forester gild the fionnula. The forester is unsaved. The forester is not doglike. The forester hyphenate the fionnula. The fionnula does not chase the forester. The fionnula is not giddy. The fionnula is not unsaved. The fionnula is not doglike. The fionnula hyphenate the forester. The fionnula does not need the forester. If the fionnula gild the forester then the fionnula does not like the forester. If someone hyphenate the fionnula then they need the forester. If someone gild the fionnula and the fionnula does not chase the forester then the fionnula does not need the forester. If someone fresco the fionnula and the fionnula gild the forester then they chase the fionnula. If someone fresco the forester and they do not like the fionnula then the forester fresco the fionnula. If someone fresco the forester and they like the forester then they are not unsaved. The forester is giddy.", "logic": "\nGild(forester, fionnula)\nUnsaved(forester)\nnot Doglike(forester)\nHyphenate(forester, fionnula)\nnot Gild(fionnula, forester)\nnot Giddy(fionnula)\nnot Unsaved(fionnula)\nnot Doglike(fionnula)\nHyphenate(fionnula, forester)\nnot Fresco(fionnula, forester)\nGild(fionnula, forester) -> not Hyphenate(fionnula, forester)\nforall x (Hyphenate(x, fionnula) -> Fresco(x, forester))\nforall x (Gild(x, fionnula) and not Gild(fionnula, forester) -> not Fresco(fionnula, forester))\nforall x (Fresco(x, fionnula) and Gild(fionnula, forester) -> Gild(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Fresco(x, forester) and not Hyphenate(x, fionnula) -> Fresco(forester, fionnula))\nforall x (Fresco(x, forester) and Hyphenate(x, forester) -> not Unsaved(x))\n\nGiddy(forester)\n\nGiddy(forester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-825"} {"premises": "Bekki is shona. Bekki is freakish. Darleen is protecting. Darleen is shona. Darleen is deist. Darleen is copious. Darleen is failing. Young, protecting people are deist. If Darleen is protecting then Darleen is freakish. If Darleen is freakish and Darleen is protecting then Darleen is copious. If someone is copious and shona then they are failing. If Darleen is freakish and Darleen is protecting then Darleen is shona. All deist people are chadian. If Darleen is protecting then Darleen is freakish. All freakish, deist people are chadian. Darleen is copious.", "logic": "\nShona(bekki)\nFreakish(bekki)\nProtecting(darleen)\nShona(darleen)\nDeist(darleen)\nCopious(darleen)\nFailing(darleen)\nforall x (Failing(x) and Protecting(x) -> Deist(x))\nProtecting(darleen) -> Freakish(darleen)\nFreakish(darleen) and Protecting(darleen) -> Copious(darleen)\nforall x (Copious(x) and Shona(x) -> Failing(x))\nFreakish(darleen) and Protecting(darleen) -> Shona(darleen)\nforall x (Deist(x) -> Chadian(x))\nProtecting(darleen) -> Freakish(darleen)\nforall x (Freakish(x) and Deist(x) -> Chadian(x))\n\nCopious(darleen)\n\ntherefore Copious(darleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "Andrej is agaze. Andrej is starry. Corky is alular. Corky is agaze. Corky is siouan. Corky is indentured. Corky is frilled. Young, alular people are siouan. If Corky is alular then Corky is starry. If Corky is starry and Corky is alular then Corky is indentured. If someone is indentured and agaze then they are frilled. If Corky is starry and Corky is alular then Corky is agaze. All siouan people are surging. If Corky is alular then Corky is starry. All starry, siouan people are surging. Corky is not siouan.", "logic": "\nAgaze(andrej)\nStarry(andrej)\nAlular(corky)\nAgaze(corky)\nSiouan(corky)\nIndentured(corky)\nFrilled(corky)\nforall x (Frilled(x) and Alular(x) -> Siouan(x))\nAlular(corky) -> Starry(corky)\nStarry(corky) and Alular(corky) -> Indentured(corky)\nforall x (Indentured(x) and Agaze(x) -> Frilled(x))\nStarry(corky) and Alular(corky) -> Agaze(corky)\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Surging(x))\nAlular(corky) -> Starry(corky)\nforall x (Starry(x) and Siouan(x) -> Surging(x))\n\nnot Siouan(corky)\n\ntherefore Siouan(corky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "Pepito is bubonic. Pepito is liberated. Pammie is paramount. Pammie is bubonic. Pammie is sternal. Pammie is zygomatic. Pammie is raiseable. Young, paramount people are sternal. If Pammie is paramount then Pammie is liberated. If Pammie is liberated and Pammie is paramount then Pammie is zygomatic. If someone is zygomatic and bubonic then they are raiseable. If Pammie is liberated and Pammie is paramount then Pammie is bubonic. All sternal people are mouthlike. If Pammie is paramount then Pammie is liberated. All liberated, sternal people are mouthlike. Pammie is liberated.", "logic": "\nBubonic(pepito)\nLiberated(pepito)\nParamount(pammie)\nBubonic(pammie)\nSternal(pammie)\nZygomatic(pammie)\nRaiseable(pammie)\nforall x (Raiseable(x) and Paramount(x) -> Sternal(x))\nParamount(pammie) -> Liberated(pammie)\nLiberated(pammie) and Paramount(pammie) -> Zygomatic(pammie)\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and Bubonic(x) -> Raiseable(x))\nLiberated(pammie) and Paramount(pammie) -> Bubonic(pammie)\nforall x (Sternal(x) -> Mouthlike(x))\nParamount(pammie) -> Liberated(pammie)\nforall x (Liberated(x) and Sternal(x) -> Mouthlike(x))\n\nLiberated(pammie)\n\nParamount(pammie) and Paramount(pammie) -> Liberated(pammie) -> therefore Liberated(pammie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "Madel is delinquent. Madel is postwar. Dustin is proofed. Dustin is delinquent. Dustin is forlorn. Dustin is snakelike. Dustin is gone. Young, proofed people are forlorn. If Dustin is proofed then Dustin is postwar. If Dustin is postwar and Dustin is proofed then Dustin is snakelike. If someone is snakelike and delinquent then they are gone. If Dustin is postwar and Dustin is proofed then Dustin is delinquent. All forlorn people are unpressed. If Dustin is proofed then Dustin is postwar. All postwar, forlorn people are unpressed. Dustin is not postwar.", "logic": "\nDelinquent(madel)\nPostwar(madel)\nProofed(dustin)\nDelinquent(dustin)\nForlorn(dustin)\nSnakelike(dustin)\nGone(dustin)\nforall x (Gone(x) and Proofed(x) -> Forlorn(x))\nProofed(dustin) -> Postwar(dustin)\nPostwar(dustin) and Proofed(dustin) -> Snakelike(dustin)\nforall x (Snakelike(x) and Delinquent(x) -> Gone(x))\nPostwar(dustin) and Proofed(dustin) -> Delinquent(dustin)\nforall x (Forlorn(x) -> Unpressed(x))\nProofed(dustin) -> Postwar(dustin)\nforall x (Postwar(x) and Forlorn(x) -> Unpressed(x))\n\nnot Postwar(dustin)\n\nProofed(dustin) and Proofed(dustin) -> Postwar(dustin) -> therefore Postwar(dustin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "Brianna is ambrosian. Brianna is barefooted. Jory is minute. Jory is ambrosian. Jory is autacoidal. Jory is squinched. Jory is bodacious. Young, minute people are autacoidal. If Jory is minute then Jory is barefooted. If Jory is barefooted and Jory is minute then Jory is squinched. If someone is squinched and ambrosian then they are bodacious. If Jory is barefooted and Jory is minute then Jory is ambrosian. All autacoidal people are laniary. If Jory is minute then Jory is barefooted. All barefooted, autacoidal people are laniary. Brianna is not bodacious.", "logic": "\nAmbrosian(brianna)\nBarefooted(brianna)\nMinute(jory)\nAmbrosian(jory)\nAutacoidal(jory)\nSquinched(jory)\nBodacious(jory)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) and Minute(x) -> Autacoidal(x))\nMinute(jory) -> Barefooted(jory)\nBarefooted(jory) and Minute(jory) -> Squinched(jory)\nforall x (Squinched(x) and Ambrosian(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nBarefooted(jory) and Minute(jory) -> Ambrosian(jory)\nforall x (Autacoidal(x) -> Laniary(x))\nMinute(jory) -> Barefooted(jory)\nforall x (Barefooted(x) and Autacoidal(x) -> Laniary(x))\n\nnot Bodacious(brianna)\n\nforall x (Squinched(x) and Ambrosian(x) -> Bodacious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "Emiline is flawless. Emiline is brushed. Forest is stuck. Forest is flawless. Forest is reverse. Forest is tragical. Forest is flaccid. Young, stuck people are reverse. If Forest is stuck then Forest is brushed. If Forest is brushed and Forest is stuck then Forest is tragical. If someone is tragical and flawless then they are flaccid. If Forest is brushed and Forest is stuck then Forest is flawless. All reverse people are rainproof. If Forest is stuck then Forest is brushed. All brushed, reverse people are rainproof. Emiline is reverse.", "logic": "\nFlawless(emiline)\nBrushed(emiline)\nStuck(forest)\nFlawless(forest)\nReverse(forest)\nTragical(forest)\nFlaccid(forest)\nforall x (Flaccid(x) and Stuck(x) -> Reverse(x))\nStuck(forest) -> Brushed(forest)\nBrushed(forest) and Stuck(forest) -> Tragical(forest)\nforall x (Tragical(x) and Flawless(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nBrushed(forest) and Stuck(forest) -> Flawless(forest)\nforall x (Reverse(x) -> Rainproof(x))\nStuck(forest) -> Brushed(forest)\nforall x (Brushed(x) and Reverse(x) -> Rainproof(x))\n\nReverse(emiline)\n\nforall x (Flaccid(x) and Stuck(x) -> Reverse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "Shanta is aerolitic. Shanta is ordinal. Arlyne is deformed. Arlyne is aerolitic. Arlyne is overnight. Arlyne is puppyish. Arlyne is unshielded. Young, deformed people are overnight. If Arlyne is deformed then Arlyne is ordinal. If Arlyne is ordinal and Arlyne is deformed then Arlyne is puppyish. If someone is puppyish and aerolitic then they are unshielded. If Arlyne is ordinal and Arlyne is deformed then Arlyne is aerolitic. All overnight people are shivering. If Arlyne is deformed then Arlyne is ordinal. All ordinal, overnight people are shivering. Shanta is not deformed.", "logic": "\nAerolitic(shanta)\nOrdinal(shanta)\nDeformed(arlyne)\nAerolitic(arlyne)\nOvernight(arlyne)\nPuppyish(arlyne)\nUnshielded(arlyne)\nforall x (Unshielded(x) and Deformed(x) -> Overnight(x))\nDeformed(arlyne) -> Ordinal(arlyne)\nOrdinal(arlyne) and Deformed(arlyne) -> Puppyish(arlyne)\nforall x (Puppyish(x) and Aerolitic(x) -> Unshielded(x))\nOrdinal(arlyne) and Deformed(arlyne) -> Aerolitic(arlyne)\nforall x (Overnight(x) -> Shivering(x))\nDeformed(arlyne) -> Ordinal(arlyne)\nforall x (Ordinal(x) and Overnight(x) -> Shivering(x))\n\nnot Deformed(shanta)\n\nnot Deformed(shanta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "Deane is oleaceous. Deane is monovular. Deloris is alkylic. Deloris is oleaceous. Deloris is crackle. Deloris is nineteen. Deloris is abundant. Young, alkylic people are crackle. If Deloris is alkylic then Deloris is monovular. If Deloris is monovular and Deloris is alkylic then Deloris is nineteen. If someone is nineteen and oleaceous then they are abundant. If Deloris is monovular and Deloris is alkylic then Deloris is oleaceous. All crackle people are corporal. If Deloris is alkylic then Deloris is monovular. All monovular, crackle people are corporal. Deane is nineteen.", "logic": "\nOleaceous(deane)\nMonovular(deane)\nAlkylic(deloris)\nOleaceous(deloris)\nCrackle(deloris)\nNineteen(deloris)\nAbundant(deloris)\nforall x (Abundant(x) and Alkylic(x) -> Crackle(x))\nAlkylic(deloris) -> Monovular(deloris)\nMonovular(deloris) and Alkylic(deloris) -> Nineteen(deloris)\nforall x (Nineteen(x) and Oleaceous(x) -> Abundant(x))\nMonovular(deloris) and Alkylic(deloris) -> Oleaceous(deloris)\nforall x (Crackle(x) -> Corporal(x))\nAlkylic(deloris) -> Monovular(deloris)\nforall x (Monovular(x) and Crackle(x) -> Corporal(x))\n\nNineteen(deane)\n\nNineteen(deane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-487"} {"premises": "The goldy insolate the nils. The goldy is braised. The goldy beat the nils. The nils infatuate the goldy. The nils is endermic. The nils is hiemal. The nils beat the goldy. If someone beat the goldy and the goldy insolate the nils then the goldy infatuate the nils. The goldy beat the nils.", "logic": "\nInsolate(goldy, nils)\nBraised(goldy)\nBeat(goldy, nils)\nInfatuate(nils, goldy)\nEndermic(nils)\nHiemal(nils)\nBeat(nils, goldy)\nforall x (Beat(x, goldy) and Insolate(goldy, nils) -> Infatuate(goldy, nils))\n\nBeat(goldy, nils)\n\ntherefore Beat(goldy, nils)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The hewie husk the bethena. The hewie is venturous. The hewie reschedule the bethena. The bethena misquote the hewie. The bethena is gigantic. The bethena is slapdash. The bethena reschedule the hewie. If someone reschedule the hewie and the hewie husk the bethena then the hewie misquote the bethena. The hewie is not venturous.", "logic": "\nHusk(hewie, bethena)\nVenturous(hewie)\nReschedule(hewie, bethena)\nMisquote(bethena, hewie)\nGigantic(bethena)\nSlapdash(bethena)\nReschedule(bethena, hewie)\nforall x (Reschedule(x, hewie) and Husk(hewie, bethena) -> Misquote(hewie, bethena))\n\nnot Venturous(hewie)\n\ntherefore Venturous(hewie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The juliann scamper the amber. The juliann is unitarian. The juliann vitalise the amber. The amber exenterate the juliann. The amber is untoasted. The amber is fathomable. The amber vitalise the juliann. If someone vitalise the juliann and the juliann scamper the amber then the juliann exenterate the amber. The juliann exenterate the amber.", "logic": "\nScamper(juliann, amber)\nUnitarian(juliann)\nVitalise(juliann, amber)\nExenterate(amber, juliann)\nUntoasted(amber)\nFathomable(amber)\nVitalise(amber, juliann)\nforall x (Vitalise(x, juliann) and Scamper(juliann, amber) -> Exenterate(juliann, amber))\n\nExenterate(juliann, amber)\n\nVitalise(amber, juliann) and Scamper(juliann, amber) and forall x (Vitalise(x, juliann) and Scamper(juliann, amber) -> Exenterate(juliann, amber)) -> therefore Exenterate(juliann, amber)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The quincy dissect the herby. The quincy is lachrymal. The quincy purport the herby. The herby rede the quincy. The herby is pakistani. The herby is paroxysmal. The herby purport the quincy. If someone purport the quincy and the quincy dissect the herby then the quincy rede the herby. The quincy does not eat the herby.", "logic": "\nDissect(quincy, herby)\nLachrymal(quincy)\nPurport(quincy, herby)\nRede(herby, quincy)\nPakistani(herby)\nParoxysmal(herby)\nPurport(herby, quincy)\nforall x (Purport(x, quincy) and Dissect(quincy, herby) -> Rede(quincy, herby))\n\nnot Rede(quincy, herby)\n\nPurport(herby, quincy) and Dissect(quincy, herby) and forall x (Purport(x, quincy) and Dissect(quincy, herby) -> Rede(quincy, herby)) -> therefore Rede(quincy, herby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The amalee globalize the meriel. The amalee is answering. The amalee come the meriel. The meriel appraise the amalee. The meriel is grasping. The meriel is puissant. The meriel come the amalee. If someone come the amalee and the amalee globalize the meriel then the amalee appraise the meriel. The meriel does not need the meriel.", "logic": "\nGlobalize(amalee, meriel)\nAnswering(amalee)\nCome(amalee, meriel)\nAppraise(meriel, amalee)\nGrasping(meriel)\nPuissant(meriel)\nCome(meriel, amalee)\nforall x (Come(x, amalee) and Globalize(amalee, meriel) -> Appraise(amalee, meriel))\n\nnot Come(meriel, meriel)\n\nnot Come(meriel, meriel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The myrlene reactivate the diahann. The myrlene is ciliated. The myrlene overleap the diahann. The diahann wharf the myrlene. The diahann is beetle. The diahann is wavering. The diahann overleap the myrlene. If someone overleap the myrlene and the myrlene reactivate the diahann then the myrlene wharf the diahann. The diahann reactivate the myrlene.", "logic": "\nReactivate(myrlene, diahann)\nCiliated(myrlene)\nOverleap(myrlene, diahann)\nWharf(diahann, myrlene)\nBeetle(diahann)\nWavering(diahann)\nOverleap(diahann, myrlene)\nforall x (Overleap(x, myrlene) and Reactivate(myrlene, diahann) -> Wharf(myrlene, diahann))\n\nReactivate(diahann, myrlene)\n\nReactivate(diahann, myrlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The nixie anatomize the ferinand. The nixie is succinct. The nixie miscreate the ferinand. The ferinand manicure the nixie. The ferinand is welcoming. The ferinand is homesick. The ferinand miscreate the nixie. If someone miscreate the nixie and the nixie anatomize the ferinand then the nixie manicure the ferinand. The ferinand does not eat the ferinand.", "logic": "\nAnatomize(nixie, ferinand)\nSuccinct(nixie)\nMiscreate(nixie, ferinand)\nManicure(ferinand, nixie)\nWelcoming(ferinand)\nHomesick(ferinand)\nMiscreate(ferinand, nixie)\nforall x (Miscreate(x, nixie) and Anatomize(nixie, ferinand) -> Manicure(nixie, ferinand))\n\nnot Manicure(ferinand, ferinand)\n\nnot Manicure(ferinand, ferinand) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The jeffie opalesce the olimpia. The jeffie is wimpish. The jeffie foolproof the olimpia. The olimpia formicate the jeffie. The olimpia is toadyish. The olimpia is acarpelous. The olimpia foolproof the jeffie. If someone foolproof the jeffie and the jeffie opalesce the olimpia then the jeffie formicate the olimpia. The jeffie foolproof the jeffie.", "logic": "\nOpalesce(jeffie, olimpia)\nWimpish(jeffie)\nFoolproof(jeffie, olimpia)\nFormicate(olimpia, jeffie)\nToadyish(olimpia)\nAcarpelous(olimpia)\nFoolproof(olimpia, jeffie)\nforall x (Foolproof(x, jeffie) and Opalesce(jeffie, olimpia) -> Formicate(jeffie, olimpia))\n\nFoolproof(jeffie, jeffie)\n\nFoolproof(jeffie, jeffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1021"} {"premises": "The winifield deflower the floyd. The floyd deflower the winifield. If something intromit the floyd then the floyd is lucrative. If something huff the winifield then the winifield intromit the floyd. If something deflower the winifield and it huff the floyd then it intromit the floyd. If something is debauched then it deflower the winifield. If the winifield intromit the floyd then the floyd is bigger. If something deflower the floyd then the floyd huff the winifield. The floyd deflower the winifield.", "logic": "\nDeflower(winifield, floyd)\nDeflower(floyd, winifield)\nforall x (Intromit(x, floyd) -> Lucrative(floyd))\nforall x (Huff(x, winifield) -> Intromit(winifield, floyd))\nforall x (Deflower(x, winifield) and Huff(x, floyd) -> Intromit(x, floyd))\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Deflower(x, winifield))\nIntromit(winifield, floyd) -> Bigger(floyd)\nforall x (Deflower(x, floyd) -> Huff(floyd, winifield))\n\nDeflower(floyd, winifield)\n\ntherefore Deflower(floyd, winifield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The jannel pamper the latrena. The latrena pamper the jannel. If something checkrow the latrena then the latrena is capillary. If something lace the jannel then the jannel checkrow the latrena. If something pamper the jannel and it lace the latrena then it checkrow the latrena. If something is avuncular then it pamper the jannel. If the jannel checkrow the latrena then the latrena is circular. If something pamper the latrena then the latrena lace the jannel. The jannel does not visit the latrena.", "logic": "\nPamper(jannel, latrena)\nPamper(latrena, jannel)\nforall x (Checkrow(x, latrena) -> Capillary(latrena))\nforall x (Lace(x, jannel) -> Checkrow(jannel, latrena))\nforall x (Pamper(x, jannel) and Lace(x, latrena) -> Checkrow(x, latrena))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Pamper(x, jannel))\nCheckrow(jannel, latrena) -> Circular(latrena)\nforall x (Pamper(x, latrena) -> Lace(latrena, jannel))\n\nnot Pamper(jannel, latrena)\n\ntherefore Pamper(jannel, latrena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The myra defat the mimi. The mimi defat the myra. If something print the mimi then the mimi is brimming. If something postpose the myra then the myra print the mimi. If something defat the myra and it postpose the mimi then it print the mimi. If something is ashen then it defat the myra. If the myra print the mimi then the mimi is knavish. If something defat the mimi then the mimi postpose the myra. The mimi postpose the myra.", "logic": "\nDefat(myra, mimi)\nDefat(mimi, myra)\nforall x (Print(x, mimi) -> Brimming(mimi))\nforall x (Postpose(x, myra) -> Print(myra, mimi))\nforall x (Defat(x, myra) and Postpose(x, mimi) -> Print(x, mimi))\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> Defat(x, myra))\nPrint(myra, mimi) -> Knavish(mimi)\nforall x (Defat(x, mimi) -> Postpose(mimi, myra))\n\nPostpose(mimi, myra)\n\nDefat(myra, mimi) and forall x (Defat(x, mimi) -> Postpose(mimi, myra)) -> therefore Postpose(mimi, myra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The fabrice section the quiggly. The quiggly section the fabrice. If something forward the quiggly then the quiggly is dusty. If something bolt the fabrice then the fabrice forward the quiggly. If something section the fabrice and it bolt the quiggly then it forward the quiggly. If something is ethiopian then it section the fabrice. If the fabrice forward the quiggly then the quiggly is nonunion. If something section the quiggly then the quiggly bolt the fabrice. The quiggly does not eat the fabrice.", "logic": "\nSection(fabrice, quiggly)\nSection(quiggly, fabrice)\nforall x (Forward(x, quiggly) -> Dusty(quiggly))\nforall x (Bolt(x, fabrice) -> Forward(fabrice, quiggly))\nforall x (Section(x, fabrice) and Bolt(x, quiggly) -> Forward(x, quiggly))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Section(x, fabrice))\nForward(fabrice, quiggly) -> Nonunion(quiggly)\nforall x (Section(x, quiggly) -> Bolt(quiggly, fabrice))\n\nnot Bolt(quiggly, fabrice)\n\nSection(fabrice, quiggly) and forall x (Section(x, quiggly) -> Bolt(quiggly, fabrice)) -> therefore Bolt(quiggly, fabrice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The dixie true the antin. The antin true the dixie. If something furbish the antin then the antin is exceeding. If something foretell the dixie then the dixie furbish the antin. If something true the dixie and it foretell the antin then it furbish the antin. If something is enforced then it true the dixie. If the dixie furbish the antin then the antin is percipient. If something true the antin then the antin foretell the dixie. The dixie furbish the antin.", "logic": "\nTrue(dixie, antin)\nTrue(antin, dixie)\nforall x (Furbish(x, antin) -> Exceeding(antin))\nforall x (Foretell(x, dixie) -> Furbish(dixie, antin))\nforall x (True(x, dixie) and Foretell(x, antin) -> Furbish(x, antin))\nforall x (Enforced(x) -> True(x, dixie))\nFurbish(dixie, antin) -> Percipient(antin)\nforall x (True(x, antin) -> Foretell(antin, dixie))\n\nFurbish(dixie, antin)\n\nTrue(dixie, antin) and forall x (True(x, antin) -> Foretell(antin, dixie)) -> therefore Foretell(antin, dixie) Foretell(antin, dixie) and forall x (Foretell(x, dixie) -> Furbish(dixie, antin)) -> therefore Furbish(dixie, antin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The flossie degauss the rolph. The rolph degauss the flossie. If something cathect the rolph then the rolph is sepaline. If something gibber the flossie then the flossie cathect the rolph. If something degauss the flossie and it gibber the rolph then it cathect the rolph. If something is erroneous then it degauss the flossie. If the flossie cathect the rolph then the rolph is odourless. If something degauss the rolph then the rolph gibber the flossie. The flossie does not see the rolph.", "logic": "\nDegauss(flossie, rolph)\nDegauss(rolph, flossie)\nforall x (Cathect(x, rolph) -> Sepaline(rolph))\nforall x (Gibber(x, flossie) -> Cathect(flossie, rolph))\nforall x (Degauss(x, flossie) and Gibber(x, rolph) -> Cathect(x, rolph))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) -> Degauss(x, flossie))\nCathect(flossie, rolph) -> Odourless(rolph)\nforall x (Degauss(x, rolph) -> Gibber(rolph, flossie))\n\nnot Cathect(flossie, rolph)\n\nDegauss(flossie, rolph) and forall x (Degauss(x, rolph) -> Gibber(rolph, flossie)) -> therefore Gibber(rolph, flossie) Gibber(rolph, flossie) and forall x (Gibber(x, flossie) -> Cathect(flossie, rolph)) -> therefore Cathect(flossie, rolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The minetta unlash the eugen. The eugen unlash the minetta. If something homologize the eugen then the eugen is triumphant. If something understand the minetta then the minetta homologize the eugen. If something unlash the minetta and it understand the eugen then it homologize the eugen. If something is iridaceous then it unlash the minetta. If the minetta homologize the eugen then the eugen is dismissed. If something unlash the eugen then the eugen understand the minetta. The eugen is triumphant.", "logic": "\nUnlash(minetta, eugen)\nUnlash(eugen, minetta)\nforall x (Homologize(x, eugen) -> Triumphant(eugen))\nforall x (Understand(x, minetta) -> Homologize(minetta, eugen))\nforall x (Unlash(x, minetta) and Understand(x, eugen) -> Homologize(x, eugen))\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Unlash(x, minetta))\nHomologize(minetta, eugen) -> Dismissed(eugen)\nforall x (Unlash(x, eugen) -> Understand(eugen, minetta))\n\nTriumphant(eugen)\n\nUnlash(minetta, eugen) and forall x (Unlash(x, eugen) -> Understand(eugen, minetta)) -> therefore Understand(eugen, minetta) Understand(eugen, minetta) and forall x (Understand(x, minetta) -> Homologize(minetta, eugen)) -> therefore Homologize(minetta, eugen) Homologize(minetta, eugen) and forall x (Homologize(x, eugen) -> Triumphant(eugen)) -> therefore Triumphant(eugen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The shirline champ the park. The park champ the shirline. If something floss the park then the park is emended. If something yell the shirline then the shirline floss the park. If something champ the shirline and it yell the park then it floss the park. If something is miasmic then it champ the shirline. If the shirline floss the park then the park is wilted. If something champ the park then the park yell the shirline. The park is not wilted.", "logic": "\nChamp(shirline, park)\nChamp(park, shirline)\nforall x (Floss(x, park) -> Emended(park))\nforall x (Yell(x, shirline) -> Floss(shirline, park))\nforall x (Champ(x, shirline) and Yell(x, park) -> Floss(x, park))\nforall x (Miasmic(x) -> Champ(x, shirline))\nFloss(shirline, park) -> Wilted(park)\nforall x (Champ(x, park) -> Yell(park, shirline))\n\nnot Wilted(park)\n\nChamp(shirline, park) and forall x (Champ(x, park) -> Yell(park, shirline)) -> therefore Yell(park, shirline) Yell(park, shirline) and forall x (Yell(x, shirline) -> Floss(shirline, park)) -> therefore Floss(shirline, park) Floss(shirline, park) and Floss(shirline, park) -> Wilted(park) -> therefore Wilted(park)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The adolfo chequer the vally. The vally chequer the adolfo. If something notarize the vally then the vally is sentential. If something twirp the adolfo then the adolfo notarize the vally. If something chequer the adolfo and it twirp the vally then it notarize the vally. If something is ferrous then it chequer the adolfo. If the adolfo notarize the vally then the vally is ultimate. If something chequer the vally then the vally twirp the adolfo. The vally does not see the vally.", "logic": "\nChequer(adolfo, vally)\nChequer(vally, adolfo)\nforall x (Notarize(x, vally) -> Sentential(vally))\nforall x (Twirp(x, adolfo) -> Notarize(adolfo, vally))\nforall x (Chequer(x, adolfo) and Twirp(x, vally) -> Notarize(x, vally))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Chequer(x, adolfo))\nNotarize(adolfo, vally) -> Ultimate(vally)\nforall x (Chequer(x, vally) -> Twirp(vally, adolfo))\n\nnot Notarize(vally, vally)\n\nforall x (Chequer(x, adolfo) and Twirp(x, vally) -> Notarize(x, vally)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The babita rinse the lindsay. The lindsay rinse the babita. If something repel the lindsay then the lindsay is irrational. If something drench the babita then the babita repel the lindsay. If something rinse the babita and it drench the lindsay then it repel the lindsay. If something is unratable then it rinse the babita. If the babita repel the lindsay then the lindsay is meshuga. If something rinse the lindsay then the lindsay drench the babita. The babita rinse the babita.", "logic": "\nRinse(babita, lindsay)\nRinse(lindsay, babita)\nforall x (Repel(x, lindsay) -> Irrational(lindsay))\nforall x (Drench(x, babita) -> Repel(babita, lindsay))\nforall x (Rinse(x, babita) and Drench(x, lindsay) -> Repel(x, lindsay))\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Rinse(x, babita))\nRepel(babita, lindsay) -> Meshuga(lindsay)\nforall x (Rinse(x, lindsay) -> Drench(lindsay, babita))\n\nRinse(babita, babita)\n\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Rinse(x, babita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The matelda wipe the maegan. The maegan wipe the matelda. If something knap the maegan then the maegan is recurrent. If something whelm the matelda then the matelda knap the maegan. If something wipe the matelda and it whelm the maegan then it knap the maegan. If something is bewildered then it wipe the matelda. If the matelda knap the maegan then the maegan is scratchy. If something wipe the maegan then the maegan whelm the matelda. The matelda does not see the matelda.", "logic": "\nWipe(matelda, maegan)\nWipe(maegan, matelda)\nforall x (Knap(x, maegan) -> Recurrent(maegan))\nforall x (Whelm(x, matelda) -> Knap(matelda, maegan))\nforall x (Wipe(x, matelda) and Whelm(x, maegan) -> Knap(x, maegan))\nforall x (Bewildered(x) -> Wipe(x, matelda))\nKnap(matelda, maegan) -> Scratchy(maegan)\nforall x (Wipe(x, maegan) -> Whelm(maegan, matelda))\n\nnot Knap(matelda, matelda)\n\nnot Knap(matelda, matelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The mike pile the archie. The archie pile the mike. If something refreshen the archie then the archie is duplex. If something impart the mike then the mike refreshen the archie. If something pile the mike and it impart the archie then it refreshen the archie. If something is subscribed then it pile the mike. If the mike refreshen the archie then the archie is prevalent. If something pile the archie then the archie impart the mike. The archie impart the archie.", "logic": "\nPile(mike, archie)\nPile(archie, mike)\nforall x (Refreshen(x, archie) -> Duplex(archie))\nforall x (Impart(x, mike) -> Refreshen(mike, archie))\nforall x (Pile(x, mike) and Impart(x, archie) -> Refreshen(x, archie))\nforall x (Subscribed(x) -> Pile(x, mike))\nRefreshen(mike, archie) -> Prevalent(archie)\nforall x (Pile(x, archie) -> Impart(archie, mike))\n\nImpart(archie, archie)\n\nImpart(archie, archie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The britte groin the gilbert. The gilbert groin the britte. If something canoe the gilbert then the gilbert is unwritten. If something unthaw the britte then the britte canoe the gilbert. If something groin the britte and it unthaw the gilbert then it canoe the gilbert. If something is senile then it groin the britte. If the britte canoe the gilbert then the gilbert is capitular. If something groin the gilbert then the gilbert unthaw the britte. The britte does not eat the gilbert.", "logic": "\nGroin(britte, gilbert)\nGroin(gilbert, britte)\nforall x (Canoe(x, gilbert) -> Unwritten(gilbert))\nforall x (Unthaw(x, britte) -> Canoe(britte, gilbert))\nforall x (Groin(x, britte) and Unthaw(x, gilbert) -> Canoe(x, gilbert))\nforall x (Senile(x) -> Groin(x, britte))\nCanoe(britte, gilbert) -> Capitular(gilbert)\nforall x (Groin(x, gilbert) -> Unthaw(gilbert, britte))\n\nnot Unthaw(britte, gilbert)\n\nnot Unthaw(britte, gilbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The jinny trench the xever. The xever trench the jinny. If something despair the xever then the xever is subfusc. If something distemper the jinny then the jinny despair the xever. If something trench the jinny and it distemper the xever then it despair the xever. If something is chartreuse then it trench the jinny. If the jinny despair the xever then the xever is nonechoic. If something trench the xever then the xever distemper the jinny. The xever is chartreuse.", "logic": "\nTrench(jinny, xever)\nTrench(xever, jinny)\nforall x (Despair(x, xever) -> Subfusc(xever))\nforall x (Distemper(x, jinny) -> Despair(jinny, xever))\nforall x (Trench(x, jinny) and Distemper(x, xever) -> Despair(x, xever))\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) -> Trench(x, jinny))\nDespair(jinny, xever) -> Nonechoic(xever)\nforall x (Trench(x, xever) -> Distemper(xever, jinny))\n\nChartreuse(xever)\n\nChartreuse(xever) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The keren incommode the mohamad. The mohamad incommode the keren. If something unleash the mohamad then the mohamad is glad. If something toll the keren then the keren unleash the mohamad. If something incommode the keren and it toll the mohamad then it unleash the mohamad. If something is cervical then it incommode the keren. If the keren unleash the mohamad then the mohamad is asleep. If something incommode the mohamad then the mohamad toll the keren. The keren is not glad.", "logic": "\nIncommode(keren, mohamad)\nIncommode(mohamad, keren)\nforall x (Unleash(x, mohamad) -> Glad(mohamad))\nforall x (Toll(x, keren) -> Unleash(keren, mohamad))\nforall x (Incommode(x, keren) and Toll(x, mohamad) -> Unleash(x, mohamad))\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Incommode(x, keren))\nUnleash(keren, mohamad) -> Asleep(mohamad)\nforall x (Incommode(x, mohamad) -> Toll(mohamad, keren))\n\nnot Glad(keren)\n\nnot Glad(keren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "The esta fence the bertram. The bertram fence the esta. If something readjust the bertram then the bertram is unabused. If something netmail the esta then the esta readjust the bertram. If something fence the esta and it netmail the bertram then it readjust the bertram. If something is brumal then it fence the esta. If the esta readjust the bertram then the bertram is pyaemic. If something fence the bertram then the bertram netmail the esta. The esta netmail the esta.", "logic": "\nFence(esta, bertram)\nFence(bertram, esta)\nforall x (Readjust(x, bertram) -> Unabused(bertram))\nforall x (Netmail(x, esta) -> Readjust(esta, bertram))\nforall x (Fence(x, esta) and Netmail(x, bertram) -> Readjust(x, bertram))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Fence(x, esta))\nReadjust(esta, bertram) -> Pyaemic(bertram)\nforall x (Fence(x, bertram) -> Netmail(bertram, esta))\n\nNetmail(esta, esta)\n\nNetmail(esta, esta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-275"} {"premises": "Trixi is forthright. Trixi is unbeholden. Trixi is remorseful. Trixi is encumbered. Marlene is roughish. Marlene is not unfettered. Marlene is forthright. If Marlene is roughish and Marlene is encumbered then Marlene is unfettered. If Marlene is roughish and Marlene is forthright then Marlene is remorseful. Furry people are not encumbered. Trixi is unbeholden.", "logic": "\nForthright(trixi)\nUnbeholden(trixi)\nRemorseful(trixi)\nEncumbered(trixi)\nRoughish(marlene)\nnot Unfettered(marlene)\nForthright(marlene)\nRoughish(marlene) and Encumbered(marlene) -> Unfettered(marlene)\nRoughish(marlene) and Forthright(marlene) -> Remorseful(marlene)\nforall x (Roughish(x) -> not Encumbered(x))\n\nUnbeholden(trixi)\n\ntherefore Unbeholden(trixi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Kevyn is feculent. Kevyn is bitter. Kevyn is pinnatifid. Kevyn is such. Joanne is japanese. Joanne is not pianistic. Joanne is feculent. If Joanne is japanese and Joanne is such then Joanne is pianistic. If Joanne is japanese and Joanne is feculent then Joanne is pinnatifid. Furry people are not such. Kevyn is not such.", "logic": "\nFeculent(kevyn)\nBitter(kevyn)\nPinnatifid(kevyn)\nSuch(kevyn)\nJapanese(joanne)\nnot Pianistic(joanne)\nFeculent(joanne)\nJapanese(joanne) and Such(joanne) -> Pianistic(joanne)\nJapanese(joanne) and Feculent(joanne) -> Pinnatifid(joanne)\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> not Such(x))\n\nnot Such(kevyn)\n\ntherefore Such(kevyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Damaris is seasonal. Damaris is lamarckian. Damaris is game. Damaris is porticoed. Bette is ethnical. Bette is not unnerving. Bette is seasonal. If Bette is ethnical and Bette is porticoed then Bette is unnerving. If Bette is ethnical and Bette is seasonal then Bette is game. Furry people are not porticoed. Bette is not porticoed.", "logic": "\nSeasonal(damaris)\nLamarckian(damaris)\nGame(damaris)\nPorticoed(damaris)\nEthnical(bette)\nnot Unnerving(bette)\nSeasonal(bette)\nEthnical(bette) and Porticoed(bette) -> Unnerving(bette)\nEthnical(bette) and Seasonal(bette) -> Game(bette)\nforall x (Ethnical(x) -> not Porticoed(x))\n\nnot Porticoed(bette)\n\nEthnical(bette) and forall x (Ethnical(x) -> not Porticoed(x)) -> therefore not Porticoed(bette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Debora is nosocomial. Debora is graphical. Debora is pronged. Debora is undogmatic. Tansy is capitular. Tansy is not dickensian. Tansy is nosocomial. If Tansy is capitular and Tansy is undogmatic then Tansy is dickensian. If Tansy is capitular and Tansy is nosocomial then Tansy is pronged. Furry people are not undogmatic. Tansy is not pronged.", "logic": "\nNosocomial(debora)\nGraphical(debora)\nPronged(debora)\nUndogmatic(debora)\nCapitular(tansy)\nnot Dickensian(tansy)\nNosocomial(tansy)\nCapitular(tansy) and Undogmatic(tansy) -> Dickensian(tansy)\nCapitular(tansy) and Nosocomial(tansy) -> Pronged(tansy)\nforall x (Capitular(x) -> not Undogmatic(x))\n\nnot Pronged(tansy)\n\nCapitular(tansy) and Nosocomial(tansy) and Capitular(tansy) and Nosocomial(tansy) -> Pronged(tansy) -> therefore Pronged(tansy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Stephie is irruptive. Stephie is beefy. Stephie is aching. Stephie is overcast. Marlene is nosohusial. Marlene is not wonderful. Marlene is irruptive. If Marlene is nosohusial and Marlene is overcast then Marlene is wonderful. If Marlene is nosohusial and Marlene is irruptive then Marlene is aching. Furry people are not overcast. Marlene is not beefy.", "logic": "\nIrruptive(stephie)\nBeefy(stephie)\nAching(stephie)\nOvercast(stephie)\nNosohusial(marlene)\nnot Wonderful(marlene)\nIrruptive(marlene)\nNosohusial(marlene) and Overcast(marlene) -> Wonderful(marlene)\nNosohusial(marlene) and Irruptive(marlene) -> Aching(marlene)\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> not Overcast(x))\n\nnot Beefy(marlene)\n\nnot Beefy(marlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Bronson is kindred. Bronson is southeast. Bronson is cleansing. Bronson is enraptured. Sherry is fingerless. Sherry is not shackled. Sherry is kindred. If Sherry is fingerless and Sherry is enraptured then Sherry is shackled. If Sherry is fingerless and Sherry is kindred then Sherry is cleansing. Furry people are not enraptured. Bronson is shackled.", "logic": "\nKindred(bronson)\nSoutheast(bronson)\nCleansing(bronson)\nEnraptured(bronson)\nFingerless(sherry)\nnot Shackled(sherry)\nKindred(sherry)\nFingerless(sherry) and Enraptured(sherry) -> Shackled(sherry)\nFingerless(sherry) and Kindred(sherry) -> Cleansing(sherry)\nforall x (Fingerless(x) -> not Enraptured(x))\n\nShackled(bronson)\n\nShackled(bronson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Kincaid is frore. Kincaid is inflexible. Kincaid is isosmotic. Kincaid is nearby. Chandal is unraised. Chandal is not jungian. Chandal is frore. If Chandal is unraised and Chandal is nearby then Chandal is jungian. If Chandal is unraised and Chandal is frore then Chandal is isosmotic. Furry people are not nearby. Chandal is not cold.", "logic": "\nFrore(kincaid)\nInflexible(kincaid)\nIsosmotic(kincaid)\nNearby(kincaid)\nUnraised(chandal)\nnot Jungian(chandal)\nFrore(chandal)\nUnraised(chandal) and Nearby(chandal) -> Jungian(chandal)\nUnraised(chandal) and Frore(chandal) -> Isosmotic(chandal)\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> not Nearby(x))\n\nnot Cold(chandal)\n\nnot Cold(chandal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Fanchon is brisant. Fanchon is provoking. Fanchon is touched. Fanchon is juridical. Joly is disclosed. Joly is not selected. Joly is brisant. If Joly is disclosed and Joly is juridical then Joly is selected. If Joly is disclosed and Joly is brisant then Joly is touched. Furry people are not juridical. Fanchon is cold.", "logic": "\nBrisant(fanchon)\nProvoking(fanchon)\nTouched(fanchon)\nJuridical(fanchon)\nDisclosed(joly)\nnot Selected(joly)\nBrisant(joly)\nDisclosed(joly) and Juridical(joly) -> Selected(joly)\nDisclosed(joly) and Brisant(joly) -> Touched(joly)\nforall x (Disclosed(x) -> not Juridical(x))\n\nCold(fanchon)\n\nCold(fanchon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1719"} {"premises": "Ursa is innate. Ursa is arguable. Ursa is not antidotal. Ursa is burdensome. Ursa is withering. Ursa is beneficent. Ursa is saltish. Young people are burdensome. Cold people are beneficent. Ursa is burdensome.", "logic": "\nInnate(ursa)\nArguable(ursa)\nnot Antidotal(ursa)\nBurdensome(ursa)\nWithering(ursa)\nBeneficent(ursa)\nSaltish(ursa)\nforall x (Saltish(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Arguable(x) -> Beneficent(x))\n\nBurdensome(ursa)\n\ntherefore Burdensome(ursa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3731"} {"premises": "Luke is unsymbolic. Luke is bibulous. Luke is not romany. Luke is indwelling. Luke is inventive. Luke is lxxvii. Luke is wideband. Young people are indwelling. Cold people are lxxvii. Luke is not unsymbolic.", "logic": "\nUnsymbolic(luke)\nBibulous(luke)\nnot Romany(luke)\nIndwelling(luke)\nInventive(luke)\nLxxvii(luke)\nWideband(luke)\nforall x (Wideband(x) -> Indwelling(x))\nforall x (Bibulous(x) -> Lxxvii(x))\n\nnot Unsymbolic(luke)\n\ntherefore Unsymbolic(luke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3731"} {"premises": "Adriane is eristic. Adrianne is impromptu. Zary is linear. Smart things are squashed. If something is linear then it is braggy. All squashed things are impromptu. Adrianne is impromptu.", "logic": "\nEristic(adriane)\nImpromptu(adrianne)\nLinear(zary)\nforall x (Braggy(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Linear(x) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Squashed(x) -> Impromptu(x))\n\nImpromptu(adrianne)\n\ntherefore Impromptu(adrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Norah is apoplectic. Tarzan is bristly. Milton is telepathic. Smart things are retroflex. If something is telepathic then it is apogean. All retroflex things are bristly. Norah is not apoplectic.", "logic": "\nApoplectic(norah)\nBristly(tarzan)\nTelepathic(milton)\nforall x (Apogean(x) -> Retroflex(x))\nforall x (Telepathic(x) -> Apogean(x))\nforall x (Retroflex(x) -> Bristly(x))\n\nnot Apoplectic(norah)\n\ntherefore Apoplectic(norah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Nunzio is gratified. Niki is maverick. Susanne is fond. Smart things are consistent. If something is fond then it is sleek. All consistent things are maverick. Susanne is sleek.", "logic": "\nGratified(nunzio)\nMaverick(niki)\nFond(susanne)\nforall x (Sleek(x) -> Consistent(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) -> Sleek(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Maverick(x))\n\nSleek(susanne)\n\nFond(susanne) and forall x (Fond(x) -> Sleek(x)) -> therefore Sleek(susanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Shumeet is cedarn. Randal is subocean. Fanya is squelched. Smart things are numbing. If something is squelched then it is scurrying. All numbing things are subocean. Fanya is not scurrying.", "logic": "\nCedarn(shumeet)\nSubocean(randal)\nSquelched(fanya)\nforall x (Scurrying(x) -> Numbing(x))\nforall x (Squelched(x) -> Scurrying(x))\nforall x (Numbing(x) -> Subocean(x))\n\nnot Scurrying(fanya)\n\nSquelched(fanya) and forall x (Squelched(x) -> Scurrying(x)) -> therefore Scurrying(fanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Karil is born. Annabel is betting. Johanna is sombre. Smart things are silklike. If something is sombre then it is permutable. All silklike things are betting. Johanna is silklike.", "logic": "\nBorn(karil)\nBetting(annabel)\nSombre(johanna)\nforall x (Permutable(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Sombre(x) -> Permutable(x))\nforall x (Silklike(x) -> Betting(x))\n\nSilklike(johanna)\n\nSombre(johanna) and forall x (Sombre(x) -> Permutable(x)) -> therefore Permutable(johanna) Permutable(johanna) and forall x (Permutable(x) -> Silklike(x)) -> therefore Silklike(johanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Moselle is satiated. Roselle is upstanding. Brice is energizing. Smart things are feverish. If something is energizing then it is documental. All feverish things are upstanding. Brice is not feverish.", "logic": "\nSatiated(moselle)\nUpstanding(roselle)\nEnergizing(brice)\nforall x (Documental(x) -> Feverish(x))\nforall x (Energizing(x) -> Documental(x))\nforall x (Feverish(x) -> Upstanding(x))\n\nnot Feverish(brice)\n\nEnergizing(brice) and forall x (Energizing(x) -> Documental(x)) -> therefore Documental(brice) Documental(brice) and forall x (Documental(x) -> Feverish(x)) -> therefore Feverish(brice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Daphene is receding. Nickey is fabulous. Michell is priapic. Smart things are sneezy. If something is priapic then it is onymous. All sneezy things are fabulous. Michell is fabulous.", "logic": "\nReceding(daphene)\nFabulous(nickey)\nPriapic(michell)\nforall x (Onymous(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Fabulous(x))\n\nFabulous(michell)\n\nPriapic(michell) and forall x (Priapic(x) -> Onymous(x)) -> therefore Onymous(michell) Onymous(michell) and forall x (Onymous(x) -> Sneezy(x)) -> therefore Sneezy(michell) Sneezy(michell) and forall x (Sneezy(x) -> Fabulous(x)) -> therefore Fabulous(michell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Isidore is spacy. Ainslie is apogean. Anatole is untired. Smart things are flashy. If something is untired then it is beetle. All flashy things are apogean. Anatole is not apogean.", "logic": "\nSpacy(isidore)\nApogean(ainslie)\nUntired(anatole)\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Flashy(x))\nforall x (Untired(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Flashy(x) -> Apogean(x))\n\nnot Apogean(anatole)\n\nUntired(anatole) and forall x (Untired(x) -> Beetle(x)) -> therefore Beetle(anatole) Beetle(anatole) and forall x (Beetle(x) -> Flashy(x)) -> therefore Flashy(anatole) Flashy(anatole) and forall x (Flashy(x) -> Apogean(x)) -> therefore Apogean(anatole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Leif is bimanual. Katusha is ticklish. Desdemona is refractive. Smart things are achromatic. If something is refractive then it is almighty. All achromatic things are ticklish. Leif is not achromatic.", "logic": "\nBimanual(leif)\nTicklish(katusha)\nRefractive(desdemona)\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nforall x (Refractive(x) -> Almighty(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Ticklish(x))\n\nnot Achromatic(leif)\n\nforall x (Almighty(x) -> Achromatic(x)) <- forall x (Refractive(x) -> Almighty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Corie is gladdened. Elicia is savourless. Anatola is antidromic. Smart things are societal. If something is antidromic then it is bruising. All societal things are savourless. Elicia is bruising.", "logic": "\nGladdened(corie)\nSavourless(elicia)\nAntidromic(anatola)\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> Societal(x))\nforall x (Antidromic(x) -> Bruising(x))\nforall x (Societal(x) -> Savourless(x))\n\nBruising(elicia)\n\nforall x (Antidromic(x) -> Bruising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Daren is unique. Xerxes is auditory. Stewart is choleraic. Smart things are entitled. If something is choleraic then it is isopteran. All entitled things are auditory. Daren is not isopteran.", "logic": "\nUnique(daren)\nAuditory(xerxes)\nCholeraic(stewart)\nforall x (Isopteran(x) -> Entitled(x))\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Isopteran(x))\nforall x (Entitled(x) -> Auditory(x))\n\nnot Isopteran(daren)\n\nforall x (Choleraic(x) -> Isopteran(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Calida is avellan. Laurette is netted. Claudie is tight. Smart things are auriferous. If something is tight then it is stifling. All auriferous things are netted. Calida is netted.", "logic": "\nAvellan(calida)\nNetted(laurette)\nTight(claudie)\nforall x (Stifling(x) -> Auriferous(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Stifling(x))\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Netted(x))\n\nNetted(calida)\n\nforall x (Auriferous(x) -> Netted(x)) <- forall x (Stifling(x) -> Auriferous(x)) <- forall x (Tight(x) -> Stifling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Leelah is negligible. Quigly is dolorous. Joelle is spartan. Smart things are peculiar. If something is spartan then it is blighted. All peculiar things are dolorous. Leelah is not spartan.", "logic": "\nNegligible(leelah)\nDolorous(quigly)\nSpartan(joelle)\nforall x (Blighted(x) -> Peculiar(x))\nforall x (Spartan(x) -> Blighted(x))\nforall x (Peculiar(x) -> Dolorous(x))\n\nnot Spartan(leelah)\n\nnot Spartan(leelah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Adrian is centroidal. Gussy is boorish. Farrah is adipose. Smart things are obedient. If something is adipose then it is zambian. All obedient things are boorish. Gussy is nice.", "logic": "\nCentroidal(adrian)\nBoorish(gussy)\nAdipose(farrah)\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Obedient(x))\nforall x (Adipose(x) -> Zambian(x))\nforall x (Obedient(x) -> Boorish(x))\n\nNice(gussy)\n\nNice(gussy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Greta is coetaneous. Valerie is roughshod. Gayla is erstwhile. Smart things are peccant. If something is erstwhile then it is cuspated. All peccant things are roughshod. Greta is not round.", "logic": "\nCoetaneous(greta)\nRoughshod(valerie)\nErstwhile(gayla)\nforall x (Cuspated(x) -> Peccant(x))\nforall x (Erstwhile(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Peccant(x) -> Roughshod(x))\n\nnot Round(greta)\n\nnot Round(greta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Rich is bonzer. Minnie is aeriferous. Mary is malawian. Smart things are airy. If something is malawian then it is sleek. All airy things are aeriferous. Mary is nice.", "logic": "\nBonzer(rich)\nAeriferous(minnie)\nMalawian(mary)\nforall x (Sleek(x) -> Airy(x))\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Sleek(x))\nforall x (Airy(x) -> Aeriferous(x))\n\nNice(mary)\n\nNice(mary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-473"} {"premises": "Lucie is planetal. Lucie is unbodied. Lucie is weatherly. Lucie is subsidised. Horatia is unbodied. Horatia is worthful. Horatia is weatherly. Horatia is subsidised. Imelda is worthful. Imelda is auricular. Imelda is weary. Imelda is subsidised. Gennifer is worthful. Gennifer is auricular. Gennifer is weary. Young, auricular things are weary. White things are subsidised. Smart, planetal things are auricular. All weary things are unbodied. Smart, weary things are planetal. If Horatia is weatherly then Horatia is worthful. If something is weatherly then it is weary. If something is planetal and subsidised then it is unbodied. Lucie is weatherly.", "logic": "\nPlanetal(lucie)\nUnbodied(lucie)\nWeatherly(lucie)\nSubsidised(lucie)\nUnbodied(horatia)\nWorthful(horatia)\nWeatherly(horatia)\nSubsidised(horatia)\nWorthful(imelda)\nAuricular(imelda)\nWeary(imelda)\nSubsidised(imelda)\nWorthful(gennifer)\nAuricular(gennifer)\nWeary(gennifer)\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Auricular(x) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Weary(x) -> Subsidised(x))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Planetal(x) -> Auricular(x))\nforall x (Weary(x) -> Unbodied(x))\nforall x (Weatherly(x) and Weary(x) -> Planetal(x))\nWeatherly(horatia) -> Worthful(horatia)\nforall x (Weatherly(x) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Planetal(x) and Subsidised(x) -> Unbodied(x))\n\nWeatherly(lucie)\n\ntherefore Weatherly(lucie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Churchill is scrupulous. Churchill is stellate. Churchill is planetal. Churchill is incan. Dagmar is stellate. Dagmar is likable. Dagmar is planetal. Dagmar is incan. Alonzo is likable. Alonzo is studious. Alonzo is arithmetic. Alonzo is incan. Valentin is likable. Valentin is studious. Valentin is arithmetic. Young, studious things are arithmetic. White things are incan. Smart, scrupulous things are studious. All arithmetic things are stellate. Smart, arithmetic things are scrupulous. If Dagmar is planetal then Dagmar is likable. If something is planetal then it is arithmetic. If something is scrupulous and incan then it is stellate. Valentin is not studious.", "logic": "\nScrupulous(churchill)\nStellate(churchill)\nPlanetal(churchill)\nIncan(churchill)\nStellate(dagmar)\nLikable(dagmar)\nPlanetal(dagmar)\nIncan(dagmar)\nLikable(alonzo)\nStudious(alonzo)\nArithmetic(alonzo)\nIncan(alonzo)\nLikable(valentin)\nStudious(valentin)\nArithmetic(valentin)\nforall x (Incan(x) and Studious(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Incan(x))\nforall x (Planetal(x) and Scrupulous(x) -> Studious(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Planetal(x) and Arithmetic(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nPlanetal(dagmar) -> Likable(dagmar)\nforall x (Planetal(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Incan(x) -> Stellate(x))\n\nnot Studious(valentin)\n\ntherefore Studious(valentin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Westley is broad. Westley is sharing. Westley is alopecic. Westley is nebular. Freda is sharing. Freda is amnestic. Freda is alopecic. Freda is nebular. Cherilyn is amnestic. Cherilyn is valvular. Cherilyn is asterisked. Cherilyn is nebular. Lorita is amnestic. Lorita is valvular. Lorita is asterisked. Young, valvular things are asterisked. White things are nebular. Smart, broad things are valvular. All asterisked things are sharing. Smart, asterisked things are broad. If Freda is alopecic then Freda is amnestic. If something is alopecic then it is asterisked. If something is broad and nebular then it is sharing. Cherilyn is sharing.", "logic": "\nBroad(westley)\nSharing(westley)\nAlopecic(westley)\nNebular(westley)\nSharing(freda)\nAmnestic(freda)\nAlopecic(freda)\nNebular(freda)\nAmnestic(cherilyn)\nValvular(cherilyn)\nAsterisked(cherilyn)\nNebular(cherilyn)\nAmnestic(lorita)\nValvular(lorita)\nAsterisked(lorita)\nforall x (Nebular(x) and Valvular(x) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Asterisked(x) -> Nebular(x))\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and Broad(x) -> Valvular(x))\nforall x (Asterisked(x) -> Sharing(x))\nforall x (Alopecic(x) and Asterisked(x) -> Broad(x))\nAlopecic(freda) -> Amnestic(freda)\nforall x (Alopecic(x) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Broad(x) and Nebular(x) -> Sharing(x))\n\nSharing(cherilyn)\n\nAsterisked(cherilyn) and forall x (Asterisked(x) -> Sharing(x)) -> therefore Sharing(cherilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Pearle is titillated. Pearle is patented. Pearle is imported. Pearle is blastular. Elaina is patented. Elaina is benthal. Elaina is imported. Elaina is blastular. George is benthal. George is flossy. George is moved. George is blastular. Llewellyn is benthal. Llewellyn is flossy. Llewellyn is moved. Young, flossy things are moved. White things are blastular. Smart, titillated things are flossy. All moved things are patented. Smart, moved things are titillated. If Elaina is imported then Elaina is benthal. If something is imported then it is moved. If something is titillated and blastular then it is patented. Llewellyn is not blastular.", "logic": "\nTitillated(pearle)\nPatented(pearle)\nImported(pearle)\nBlastular(pearle)\nPatented(elaina)\nBenthal(elaina)\nImported(elaina)\nBlastular(elaina)\nBenthal(george)\nFlossy(george)\nMoved(george)\nBlastular(george)\nBenthal(llewellyn)\nFlossy(llewellyn)\nMoved(llewellyn)\nforall x (Blastular(x) and Flossy(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Moved(x) -> Blastular(x))\nforall x (Imported(x) and Titillated(x) -> Flossy(x))\nforall x (Moved(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Imported(x) and Moved(x) -> Titillated(x))\nImported(elaina) -> Benthal(elaina)\nforall x (Imported(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Titillated(x) and Blastular(x) -> Patented(x))\n\nnot Blastular(llewellyn)\n\nMoved(llewellyn) and forall x (Moved(x) -> Blastular(x)) -> therefore Blastular(llewellyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Ellette is falcate. Ellette is toilsome. Ellette is aldermanly. Ellette is insensate. Allison is toilsome. Allison is liable. Allison is aldermanly. Allison is insensate. Hyatt is liable. Hyatt is micro. Hyatt is matching. Hyatt is insensate. Beth is liable. Beth is micro. Beth is matching. Young, micro things are matching. White things are insensate. Smart, falcate things are micro. All matching things are toilsome. Smart, matching things are falcate. If Allison is aldermanly then Allison is liable. If something is aldermanly then it is matching. If something is falcate and insensate then it is toilsome. Allison is falcate.", "logic": "\nFalcate(ellette)\nToilsome(ellette)\nAldermanly(ellette)\nInsensate(ellette)\nToilsome(allison)\nLiable(allison)\nAldermanly(allison)\nInsensate(allison)\nLiable(hyatt)\nMicro(hyatt)\nMatching(hyatt)\nInsensate(hyatt)\nLiable(beth)\nMicro(beth)\nMatching(beth)\nforall x (Insensate(x) and Micro(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Matching(x) -> Insensate(x))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) and Falcate(x) -> Micro(x))\nforall x (Matching(x) -> Toilsome(x))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) and Matching(x) -> Falcate(x))\nAldermanly(allison) -> Liable(allison)\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) and Insensate(x) -> Toilsome(x))\n\nFalcate(allison)\n\nAldermanly(allison) and forall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Matching(x)) -> therefore Matching(allison) Aldermanly(allison) and Matching(allison) and forall x (Aldermanly(x) and Matching(x) -> Falcate(x)) -> therefore Falcate(allison)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Toinette is reflex. Toinette is lusty. Toinette is flavourful. Toinette is bolshy. Aleecia is lusty. Aleecia is mutual. Aleecia is flavourful. Aleecia is bolshy. Winton is mutual. Winton is motorial. Winton is vexatious. Winton is bolshy. Ange is mutual. Ange is motorial. Ange is vexatious. Young, motorial things are vexatious. White things are bolshy. Smart, reflex things are motorial. All vexatious things are lusty. Smart, vexatious things are reflex. If Aleecia is flavourful then Aleecia is mutual. If something is flavourful then it is vexatious. If something is reflex and bolshy then it is lusty. Aleecia is not reflex.", "logic": "\nReflex(toinette)\nLusty(toinette)\nFlavourful(toinette)\nBolshy(toinette)\nLusty(aleecia)\nMutual(aleecia)\nFlavourful(aleecia)\nBolshy(aleecia)\nMutual(winton)\nMotorial(winton)\nVexatious(winton)\nBolshy(winton)\nMutual(ange)\nMotorial(ange)\nVexatious(ange)\nforall x (Bolshy(x) and Motorial(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Vexatious(x) -> Bolshy(x))\nforall x (Flavourful(x) and Reflex(x) -> Motorial(x))\nforall x (Vexatious(x) -> Lusty(x))\nforall x (Flavourful(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Reflex(x))\nFlavourful(aleecia) -> Mutual(aleecia)\nforall x (Flavourful(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Bolshy(x) -> Lusty(x))\n\nnot Reflex(aleecia)\n\nFlavourful(aleecia) and forall x (Flavourful(x) -> Vexatious(x)) -> therefore Vexatious(aleecia) Flavourful(aleecia) and Vexatious(aleecia) and forall x (Flavourful(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Reflex(x)) -> therefore Reflex(aleecia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Raoul is grazed. Raoul is trigonal. Raoul is distaff. Raoul is attachable. Glory is trigonal. Glory is soundproof. Glory is distaff. Glory is attachable. Stanfield is soundproof. Stanfield is weatherly. Stanfield is understood. Stanfield is attachable. Lazarus is soundproof. Lazarus is weatherly. Lazarus is understood. Young, weatherly things are understood. White things are attachable. Smart, grazed things are weatherly. All understood things are trigonal. Smart, understood things are grazed. If Glory is distaff then Glory is soundproof. If something is distaff then it is understood. If something is grazed and attachable then it is trigonal. Glory is weatherly.", "logic": "\nGrazed(raoul)\nTrigonal(raoul)\nDistaff(raoul)\nAttachable(raoul)\nTrigonal(glory)\nSoundproof(glory)\nDistaff(glory)\nAttachable(glory)\nSoundproof(stanfield)\nWeatherly(stanfield)\nUnderstood(stanfield)\nAttachable(stanfield)\nSoundproof(lazarus)\nWeatherly(lazarus)\nUnderstood(lazarus)\nforall x (Attachable(x) and Weatherly(x) -> Understood(x))\nforall x (Understood(x) -> Attachable(x))\nforall x (Distaff(x) and Grazed(x) -> Weatherly(x))\nforall x (Understood(x) -> Trigonal(x))\nforall x (Distaff(x) and Understood(x) -> Grazed(x))\nDistaff(glory) -> Soundproof(glory)\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Understood(x))\nforall x (Grazed(x) and Attachable(x) -> Trigonal(x))\n\nWeatherly(glory)\n\nDistaff(glory) and forall x (Distaff(x) -> Understood(x)) -> therefore Understood(glory) Distaff(glory) and Understood(glory) and forall x (Distaff(x) and Understood(x) -> Grazed(x)) -> therefore Grazed(glory) Distaff(glory) and Grazed(glory) and forall x (Distaff(x) and Grazed(x) -> Weatherly(x)) -> therefore Weatherly(glory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Eba is burnished. Eba is omnipotent. Eba is amphoric. Eba is bengali. Bree is omnipotent. Bree is benzoic. Bree is amphoric. Bree is bengali. Rozanne is benzoic. Rozanne is musing. Rozanne is pharisaic. Rozanne is bengali. Conroy is benzoic. Conroy is musing. Conroy is pharisaic. Young, musing things are pharisaic. White things are bengali. Smart, burnished things are musing. All pharisaic things are omnipotent. Smart, pharisaic things are burnished. If Bree is amphoric then Bree is benzoic. If something is amphoric then it is pharisaic. If something is burnished and bengali then it is omnipotent. Bree is not musing.", "logic": "\nBurnished(eba)\nOmnipotent(eba)\nAmphoric(eba)\nBengali(eba)\nOmnipotent(bree)\nBenzoic(bree)\nAmphoric(bree)\nBengali(bree)\nBenzoic(rozanne)\nMusing(rozanne)\nPharisaic(rozanne)\nBengali(rozanne)\nBenzoic(conroy)\nMusing(conroy)\nPharisaic(conroy)\nforall x (Bengali(x) and Musing(x) -> Pharisaic(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Amphoric(x) and Burnished(x) -> Musing(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Omnipotent(x))\nforall x (Amphoric(x) and Pharisaic(x) -> Burnished(x))\nAmphoric(bree) -> Benzoic(bree)\nforall x (Amphoric(x) -> Pharisaic(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and Bengali(x) -> Omnipotent(x))\n\nnot Musing(bree)\n\nAmphoric(bree) and forall x (Amphoric(x) -> Pharisaic(x)) -> therefore Pharisaic(bree) Amphoric(bree) and Pharisaic(bree) and forall x (Amphoric(x) and Pharisaic(x) -> Burnished(x)) -> therefore Burnished(bree) Amphoric(bree) and Burnished(bree) and forall x (Amphoric(x) and Burnished(x) -> Musing(x)) -> therefore Musing(bree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Leeann is underbred. Leeann is raped. Leeann is pharaonic. Leeann is attired. Jeremiah is raped. Jeremiah is dextral. Jeremiah is pharaonic. Jeremiah is attired. Lionel is dextral. Lionel is friendly. Lionel is applicable. Lionel is attired. Jolie is dextral. Jolie is friendly. Jolie is applicable. Young, friendly things are applicable. White things are attired. Smart, underbred things are friendly. All applicable things are raped. Smart, applicable things are underbred. If Jeremiah is pharaonic then Jeremiah is dextral. If something is pharaonic then it is applicable. If something is underbred and attired then it is raped. Lionel is not underbred.", "logic": "\nUnderbred(leeann)\nRaped(leeann)\nPharaonic(leeann)\nAttired(leeann)\nRaped(jeremiah)\nDextral(jeremiah)\nPharaonic(jeremiah)\nAttired(jeremiah)\nDextral(lionel)\nFriendly(lionel)\nApplicable(lionel)\nAttired(lionel)\nDextral(jolie)\nFriendly(jolie)\nApplicable(jolie)\nforall x (Attired(x) and Friendly(x) -> Applicable(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and Underbred(x) -> Friendly(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Raped(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and Applicable(x) -> Underbred(x))\nPharaonic(jeremiah) -> Dextral(jeremiah)\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Applicable(x))\nforall x (Underbred(x) and Attired(x) -> Raped(x))\n\nnot Underbred(lionel)\n\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and Applicable(x) -> Underbred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Tomkin is gimbaled. Tomkin is irruptive. Tomkin is diamantine. Tomkin is drowsy. Malanie is irruptive. Malanie is shaded. Malanie is diamantine. Malanie is drowsy. Georgia is shaded. Georgia is gushing. Georgia is attentive. Georgia is drowsy. Leandra is shaded. Leandra is gushing. Leandra is attentive. Young, gushing things are attentive. White things are drowsy. Smart, gimbaled things are gushing. All attentive things are irruptive. Smart, attentive things are gimbaled. If Malanie is diamantine then Malanie is shaded. If something is diamantine then it is attentive. If something is gimbaled and drowsy then it is irruptive. Leandra is gimbaled.", "logic": "\nGimbaled(tomkin)\nIrruptive(tomkin)\nDiamantine(tomkin)\nDrowsy(tomkin)\nIrruptive(malanie)\nShaded(malanie)\nDiamantine(malanie)\nDrowsy(malanie)\nShaded(georgia)\nGushing(georgia)\nAttentive(georgia)\nDrowsy(georgia)\nShaded(leandra)\nGushing(leandra)\nAttentive(leandra)\nforall x (Drowsy(x) and Gushing(x) -> Attentive(x))\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) and Gimbaled(x) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Attentive(x) -> Irruptive(x))\nforall x (Diamantine(x) and Attentive(x) -> Gimbaled(x))\nDiamantine(malanie) -> Shaded(malanie)\nforall x (Diamantine(x) -> Attentive(x))\nforall x (Gimbaled(x) and Drowsy(x) -> Irruptive(x))\n\nGimbaled(leandra)\n\nforall x (Diamantine(x) and Attentive(x) -> Gimbaled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Broderick is stressed. Broderick is plowed. Broderick is windy. Broderick is cunning. Jessika is plowed. Jessika is loth. Jessika is windy. Jessika is cunning. Elijah is loth. Elijah is mirrored. Elijah is subatomic. Elijah is cunning. Adel is loth. Adel is mirrored. Adel is subatomic. Young, mirrored things are subatomic. White things are cunning. Smart, stressed things are mirrored. All subatomic things are plowed. Smart, subatomic things are stressed. If Jessika is windy then Jessika is loth. If something is windy then it is subatomic. If something is stressed and cunning then it is plowed. Adel is not windy.", "logic": "\nStressed(broderick)\nPlowed(broderick)\nWindy(broderick)\nCunning(broderick)\nPlowed(jessika)\nLoth(jessika)\nWindy(jessika)\nCunning(jessika)\nLoth(elijah)\nMirrored(elijah)\nSubatomic(elijah)\nCunning(elijah)\nLoth(adel)\nMirrored(adel)\nSubatomic(adel)\nforall x (Cunning(x) and Mirrored(x) -> Subatomic(x))\nforall x (Subatomic(x) -> Cunning(x))\nforall x (Windy(x) and Stressed(x) -> Mirrored(x))\nforall x (Subatomic(x) -> Plowed(x))\nforall x (Windy(x) and Subatomic(x) -> Stressed(x))\nWindy(jessika) -> Loth(jessika)\nforall x (Windy(x) -> Subatomic(x))\nforall x (Stressed(x) and Cunning(x) -> Plowed(x))\n\nnot Windy(adel)\n\nnot Windy(adel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Charo is blowsy. Charo is elated. Charo is vowellike. Charo is savorless. Rubetta is elated. Rubetta is coriaceous. Rubetta is vowellike. Rubetta is savorless. Gwyn is coriaceous. Gwyn is movable. Gwyn is tailless. Gwyn is savorless. Amabel is coriaceous. Amabel is movable. Amabel is tailless. Young, movable things are tailless. White things are savorless. Smart, blowsy things are movable. All tailless things are elated. Smart, tailless things are blowsy. If Rubetta is vowellike then Rubetta is coriaceous. If something is vowellike then it is tailless. If something is blowsy and savorless then it is elated. Gwyn is vowellike.", "logic": "\nBlowsy(charo)\nElated(charo)\nVowellike(charo)\nSavorless(charo)\nElated(rubetta)\nCoriaceous(rubetta)\nVowellike(rubetta)\nSavorless(rubetta)\nCoriaceous(gwyn)\nMovable(gwyn)\nTailless(gwyn)\nSavorless(gwyn)\nCoriaceous(amabel)\nMovable(amabel)\nTailless(amabel)\nforall x (Savorless(x) and Movable(x) -> Tailless(x))\nforall x (Tailless(x) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) and Blowsy(x) -> Movable(x))\nforall x (Tailless(x) -> Elated(x))\nforall x (Vowellike(x) and Tailless(x) -> Blowsy(x))\nVowellike(rubetta) -> Coriaceous(rubetta)\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Tailless(x))\nforall x (Blowsy(x) and Savorless(x) -> Elated(x))\n\nVowellike(gwyn)\n\nVowellike(gwyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "The lorri is iliac. If someone is censurable and not iliac then they are thirsty. Round people are thirsty. If someone is episcopal then they are censurable. Nice, thirsty people are censurable. If someone is thirsty then they are ossified. If the lorri is iliac then the lorri is episcopal. The lorri is iliac.", "logic": "\nIliac(lorri)\nforall x (Censurable(x) and not Iliac(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Episcopal(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Episcopal(x) -> Censurable(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) and Thirsty(x) -> Censurable(x))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) -> Ossified(x))\nIliac(lorri) -> Episcopal(lorri)\n\nIliac(lorri)\n\ntherefore Iliac(lorri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The tuesday is unearned. If someone is lousy and not unearned then they are triune. Round people are triune. If someone is ravaging then they are lousy. Nice, triune people are lousy. If someone is triune then they are migratory. If the tuesday is unearned then the tuesday is ravaging. The tuesday is not unearned.", "logic": "\nUnearned(tuesday)\nforall x (Lousy(x) and not Unearned(x) -> Triune(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Triune(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Lousy(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Triune(x) -> Lousy(x))\nforall x (Triune(x) -> Migratory(x))\nUnearned(tuesday) -> Ravaging(tuesday)\n\nnot Unearned(tuesday)\n\ntherefore Unearned(tuesday)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The tan is bewitching. If someone is sclerosed and not bewitching then they are dispirited. Round people are dispirited. If someone is precarious then they are sclerosed. Nice, dispirited people are sclerosed. If someone is dispirited then they are getable. If the tan is bewitching then the tan is precarious. The tan is precarious.", "logic": "\nBewitching(tan)\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) and not Bewitching(x) -> Dispirited(x))\nforall x (Precarious(x) -> Dispirited(x))\nforall x (Precarious(x) -> Sclerosed(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) and Dispirited(x) -> Sclerosed(x))\nforall x (Dispirited(x) -> Getable(x))\nBewitching(tan) -> Precarious(tan)\n\nPrecarious(tan)\n\nBewitching(tan) and Bewitching(tan) -> Precarious(tan) -> therefore Precarious(tan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The rosemarie is figural. If someone is sarawakian and not figural then they are heliac. Round people are heliac. If someone is dismantled then they are sarawakian. Nice, heliac people are sarawakian. If someone is heliac then they are fervent. If the rosemarie is figural then the rosemarie is dismantled. The rosemarie is not dismantled.", "logic": "\nFigural(rosemarie)\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and not Figural(x) -> Heliac(x))\nforall x (Dismantled(x) -> Heliac(x))\nforall x (Dismantled(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nforall x (Fervent(x) and Heliac(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nforall x (Heliac(x) -> Fervent(x))\nFigural(rosemarie) -> Dismantled(rosemarie)\n\nnot Dismantled(rosemarie)\n\nFigural(rosemarie) and Figural(rosemarie) -> Dismantled(rosemarie) -> therefore Dismantled(rosemarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The hadleigh is schmalzy. If someone is eternal and not schmalzy then they are actionable. Round people are actionable. If someone is sprawly then they are eternal. Nice, actionable people are eternal. If someone is actionable then they are calcic. If the hadleigh is schmalzy then the hadleigh is sprawly. The hadleigh is actionable.", "logic": "\nSchmalzy(hadleigh)\nforall x (Eternal(x) and not Schmalzy(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) -> Eternal(x))\nforall x (Calcic(x) and Actionable(x) -> Eternal(x))\nforall x (Actionable(x) -> Calcic(x))\nSchmalzy(hadleigh) -> Sprawly(hadleigh)\n\nActionable(hadleigh)\n\nSchmalzy(hadleigh) and Schmalzy(hadleigh) -> Sprawly(hadleigh) -> therefore Sprawly(hadleigh) Sprawly(hadleigh) and forall x (Sprawly(x) -> Actionable(x)) -> therefore Actionable(hadleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The sampson is feline. If someone is holozoic and not feline then they are offhanded. Round people are offhanded. If someone is manque then they are holozoic. Nice, offhanded people are holozoic. If someone is offhanded then they are bespoken. If the sampson is feline then the sampson is manque. The sampson is not holozoic.", "logic": "\nFeline(sampson)\nforall x (Holozoic(x) and not Feline(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) and Offhanded(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Offhanded(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nFeline(sampson) -> Manque(sampson)\n\nnot Holozoic(sampson)\n\nFeline(sampson) and Feline(sampson) -> Manque(sampson) -> therefore Manque(sampson) Manque(sampson) and forall x (Manque(x) -> Holozoic(x)) -> therefore Holozoic(sampson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The stanleigh is unleavened. If someone is delineate and not unleavened then they are blemished. Round people are blemished. If someone is undersea then they are delineate. Nice, blemished people are delineate. If someone is blemished then they are xxxviii. If the stanleigh is unleavened then the stanleigh is undersea. The stanleigh is xxxviii.", "logic": "\nUnleavened(stanleigh)\nforall x (Delineate(x) and not Unleavened(x) -> Blemished(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Blemished(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Delineate(x))\nforall x (Xxxviii(x) and Blemished(x) -> Delineate(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) -> Xxxviii(x))\nUnleavened(stanleigh) -> Undersea(stanleigh)\n\nXxxviii(stanleigh)\n\nUnleavened(stanleigh) and Unleavened(stanleigh) -> Undersea(stanleigh) -> therefore Undersea(stanleigh) Undersea(stanleigh) and forall x (Undersea(x) -> Blemished(x)) -> therefore Blemished(stanleigh) Blemished(stanleigh) and forall x (Blemished(x) -> Xxxviii(x)) -> therefore Xxxviii(stanleigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The hollie is apneic. If someone is edacious and not apneic then they are african. Round people are african. If someone is discordant then they are edacious. Nice, african people are edacious. If someone is african then they are sinistral. If the hollie is apneic then the hollie is discordant. The hollie is not sinistral.", "logic": "\nApneic(hollie)\nforall x (Edacious(x) and not Apneic(x) -> African(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> African(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> Edacious(x))\nforall x (Sinistral(x) and African(x) -> Edacious(x))\nforall x (African(x) -> Sinistral(x))\nApneic(hollie) -> Discordant(hollie)\n\nnot Sinistral(hollie)\n\nApneic(hollie) and Apneic(hollie) -> Discordant(hollie) -> therefore Discordant(hollie) Discordant(hollie) and forall x (Discordant(x) -> African(x)) -> therefore African(hollie) African(hollie) and forall x (African(x) -> Sinistral(x)) -> therefore Sinistral(hollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The slim is unfettered. If someone is wagnerian and not unfettered then they are immemorial. Round people are immemorial. If someone is shelfy then they are wagnerian. Nice, immemorial people are wagnerian. If someone is immemorial then they are abbatial. If the slim is unfettered then the slim is shelfy. The slim does not eat the slim.", "logic": "\nUnfettered(slim)\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) and not Unfettered(x) -> Immemorial(x))\nforall x (Shelfy(x) -> Immemorial(x))\nforall x (Shelfy(x) -> Wagnerian(x))\nforall x (Abbatial(x) and Immemorial(x) -> Wagnerian(x))\nforall x (Immemorial(x) -> Abbatial(x))\nUnfettered(slim) -> Shelfy(slim)\n\nnot Eats(slim, slim)\n\nnot Eats(slim, slim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The jazmin is unquiet. If someone is frizzly and not unquiet then they are legato. Round people are legato. If someone is rustling then they are frizzly. Nice, legato people are frizzly. If someone is legato then they are southern. If the jazmin is unquiet then the jazmin is rustling. The jazmin chases the jazmin.", "logic": "\nUnquiet(jazmin)\nforall x (Frizzly(x) and not Unquiet(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Rustling(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Rustling(x) -> Frizzly(x))\nforall x (Southern(x) and Legato(x) -> Frizzly(x))\nforall x (Legato(x) -> Southern(x))\nUnquiet(jazmin) -> Rustling(jazmin)\n\nChases(jazmin, jazmin)\n\nChases(jazmin, jazmin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1220"} {"premises": "The enrico is underlying. The enrico is not junoesque. The enrico huckster the gregorio. The enrico gyrate the gregorio. The enrico gyrate the vanna. The enrico dramatize the vanna. The angelita is junoesque. The angelita gyrate the gregorio. The angelita gyrate the vanna. The angelita dramatize the vanna. The gregorio is not junoesque. The gregorio huckster the enrico. The gregorio dramatize the vanna. The vanna huckster the enrico. The vanna does not need the enrico. If something is junoesque and it dramatize the gregorio then the gregorio gyrate the enrico. If something is underlying then it huckster the angelita. If something huckster the angelita then it dramatize the gregorio. If something huckster the enrico and it huckster the gregorio then it gyrate the gregorio. If something is underlying and it does not need the gregorio then it dramatize the vanna. If something dramatize the gregorio and it dramatize the vanna then the vanna is untrue. The angelita gyrate the gregorio.", "logic": "\nUnderlying(enrico)\nnot Junoesque(enrico)\nHuckster(enrico, gregorio)\nGyrate(enrico, gregorio)\nGyrate(enrico, vanna)\nDramatize(enrico, vanna)\nJunoesque(angelita)\nGyrate(angelita, gregorio)\nGyrate(angelita, vanna)\nDramatize(angelita, vanna)\nnot Junoesque(gregorio)\nHuckster(gregorio, enrico)\nDramatize(gregorio, vanna)\nHuckster(vanna, enrico)\nnot Gyrate(vanna, enrico)\nforall x (Junoesque(x) and Dramatize(x, gregorio) -> Gyrate(gregorio, enrico))\nforall x (Underlying(x) -> Huckster(x, angelita))\nforall x (Huckster(x, angelita) -> Dramatize(x, gregorio))\nforall x (Huckster(x, enrico) and Huckster(x, gregorio) -> Gyrate(x, gregorio))\nforall x (Underlying(x) and not Gyrate(x, gregorio) -> Dramatize(x, vanna))\nforall x (Dramatize(x, gregorio) and Dramatize(x, vanna) -> Untrue(vanna))\n\nGyrate(angelita, gregorio)\n\ntherefore Gyrate(angelita, gregorio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The pearle is fungicidal. The pearle is not acrogenous. The pearle pinpoint the irvin. The pearle dent the irvin. The pearle dent the margo. The pearle honk the margo. The teddi is acrogenous. The teddi dent the irvin. The teddi dent the margo. The teddi honk the margo. The irvin is not acrogenous. The irvin pinpoint the pearle. The irvin honk the margo. The margo pinpoint the pearle. The margo does not need the pearle. If something is acrogenous and it honk the irvin then the irvin dent the pearle. If something is fungicidal then it pinpoint the teddi. If something pinpoint the teddi then it honk the irvin. If something pinpoint the pearle and it pinpoint the irvin then it dent the irvin. If something is fungicidal and it does not need the irvin then it honk the margo. If something honk the irvin and it honk the margo then the margo is sufferable. The teddi does not need the irvin.", "logic": "\nFungicidal(pearle)\nnot Acrogenous(pearle)\nPinpoint(pearle, irvin)\nDent(pearle, irvin)\nDent(pearle, margo)\nHonk(pearle, margo)\nAcrogenous(teddi)\nDent(teddi, irvin)\nDent(teddi, margo)\nHonk(teddi, margo)\nnot Acrogenous(irvin)\nPinpoint(irvin, pearle)\nHonk(irvin, margo)\nPinpoint(margo, pearle)\nnot Dent(margo, pearle)\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) and Honk(x, irvin) -> Dent(irvin, pearle))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Pinpoint(x, teddi))\nforall x (Pinpoint(x, teddi) -> Honk(x, irvin))\nforall x (Pinpoint(x, pearle) and Pinpoint(x, irvin) -> Dent(x, irvin))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) and not Dent(x, irvin) -> Honk(x, margo))\nforall x (Honk(x, irvin) and Honk(x, margo) -> Sufferable(margo))\n\nnot Dent(teddi, irvin)\n\ntherefore Dent(teddi, irvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The stewart is zoftig. The stewart is not fortissimo. The stewart avoid the townsend. The stewart elide the townsend. The stewart elide the chloette. The stewart squeal the chloette. The florencia is fortissimo. The florencia elide the townsend. The florencia elide the chloette. The florencia squeal the chloette. The townsend is not fortissimo. The townsend avoid the stewart. The townsend squeal the chloette. The chloette avoid the stewart. The chloette does not need the stewart. If something is fortissimo and it squeal the townsend then the townsend elide the stewart. If something is zoftig then it avoid the florencia. If something avoid the florencia then it squeal the townsend. If something avoid the stewart and it avoid the townsend then it elide the townsend. If something is zoftig and it does not need the townsend then it squeal the chloette. If something squeal the townsend and it squeal the chloette then the chloette is terrifying. The stewart avoid the florencia.", "logic": "\nZoftig(stewart)\nnot Fortissimo(stewart)\nAvoid(stewart, townsend)\nElide(stewart, townsend)\nElide(stewart, chloette)\nSqueal(stewart, chloette)\nFortissimo(florencia)\nElide(florencia, townsend)\nElide(florencia, chloette)\nSqueal(florencia, chloette)\nnot Fortissimo(townsend)\nAvoid(townsend, stewart)\nSqueal(townsend, chloette)\nAvoid(chloette, stewart)\nnot Elide(chloette, stewart)\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) and Squeal(x, townsend) -> Elide(townsend, stewart))\nforall x (Zoftig(x) -> Avoid(x, florencia))\nforall x (Avoid(x, florencia) -> Squeal(x, townsend))\nforall x (Avoid(x, stewart) and Avoid(x, townsend) -> Elide(x, townsend))\nforall x (Zoftig(x) and not Elide(x, townsend) -> Squeal(x, chloette))\nforall x (Squeal(x, townsend) and Squeal(x, chloette) -> Terrifying(chloette))\n\nAvoid(stewart, florencia)\n\nZoftig(stewart) and forall x (Zoftig(x) -> Avoid(x, florencia)) -> therefore Avoid(stewart, florencia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The urson is brushed. The urson is not grimy. The urson whale the lavena. The urson mentor the lavena. The urson mentor the katinka. The urson temporise the katinka. The sile is grimy. The sile mentor the lavena. The sile mentor the katinka. The sile temporise the katinka. The lavena is not grimy. The lavena whale the urson. The lavena temporise the katinka. The katinka whale the urson. The katinka does not need the urson. If something is grimy and it temporise the lavena then the lavena mentor the urson. If something is brushed then it whale the sile. If something whale the sile then it temporise the lavena. If something whale the urson and it whale the lavena then it mentor the lavena. If something is brushed and it does not need the lavena then it temporise the katinka. If something temporise the lavena and it temporise the katinka then the katinka is tempered. The urson does not like the sile.", "logic": "\nBrushed(urson)\nnot Grimy(urson)\nWhale(urson, lavena)\nMentor(urson, lavena)\nMentor(urson, katinka)\nTemporise(urson, katinka)\nGrimy(sile)\nMentor(sile, lavena)\nMentor(sile, katinka)\nTemporise(sile, katinka)\nnot Grimy(lavena)\nWhale(lavena, urson)\nTemporise(lavena, katinka)\nWhale(katinka, urson)\nnot Mentor(katinka, urson)\nforall x (Grimy(x) and Temporise(x, lavena) -> Mentor(lavena, urson))\nforall x (Brushed(x) -> Whale(x, sile))\nforall x (Whale(x, sile) -> Temporise(x, lavena))\nforall x (Whale(x, urson) and Whale(x, lavena) -> Mentor(x, lavena))\nforall x (Brushed(x) and not Mentor(x, lavena) -> Temporise(x, katinka))\nforall x (Temporise(x, lavena) and Temporise(x, katinka) -> Tempered(katinka))\n\nnot Whale(urson, sile)\n\nBrushed(urson) and forall x (Brushed(x) -> Whale(x, sile)) -> therefore Whale(urson, sile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The rachelle is bereaved. The rachelle is not anodal. The rachelle ruggedise the garcia. The rachelle unsex the garcia. The rachelle unsex the tabor. The rachelle boob the tabor. The koo is anodal. The koo unsex the garcia. The koo unsex the tabor. The koo boob the tabor. The garcia is not anodal. The garcia ruggedise the rachelle. The garcia boob the tabor. The tabor ruggedise the rachelle. The tabor does not need the rachelle. If something is anodal and it boob the garcia then the garcia unsex the rachelle. If something is bereaved then it ruggedise the koo. If something ruggedise the koo then it boob the garcia. If something ruggedise the rachelle and it ruggedise the garcia then it unsex the garcia. If something is bereaved and it does not need the garcia then it boob the tabor. If something boob the garcia and it boob the tabor then the tabor is matutinal. The rachelle boob the garcia.", "logic": "\nBereaved(rachelle)\nnot Anodal(rachelle)\nRuggedise(rachelle, garcia)\nUnsex(rachelle, garcia)\nUnsex(rachelle, tabor)\nBoob(rachelle, tabor)\nAnodal(koo)\nUnsex(koo, garcia)\nUnsex(koo, tabor)\nBoob(koo, tabor)\nnot Anodal(garcia)\nRuggedise(garcia, rachelle)\nBoob(garcia, tabor)\nRuggedise(tabor, rachelle)\nnot Unsex(tabor, rachelle)\nforall x (Anodal(x) and Boob(x, garcia) -> Unsex(garcia, rachelle))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) -> Ruggedise(x, koo))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, koo) -> Boob(x, garcia))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, rachelle) and Ruggedise(x, garcia) -> Unsex(x, garcia))\nforall x (Bereaved(x) and not Unsex(x, garcia) -> Boob(x, tabor))\nforall x (Boob(x, garcia) and Boob(x, tabor) -> Matutinal(tabor))\n\nBoob(rachelle, garcia)\n\nBereaved(rachelle) and forall x (Bereaved(x) -> Ruggedise(x, koo)) -> therefore Ruggedise(rachelle, koo) Ruggedise(rachelle, koo) and forall x (Ruggedise(x, koo) -> Boob(x, garcia)) -> therefore Boob(rachelle, garcia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The bobina is unsighted. The bobina is not obstetric. The bobina dangle the elizabeth. The bobina alibi the elizabeth. The bobina alibi the josi. The bobina awake the josi. The ninnette is obstetric. The ninnette alibi the elizabeth. The ninnette alibi the josi. The ninnette awake the josi. The elizabeth is not obstetric. The elizabeth dangle the bobina. The elizabeth awake the josi. The josi dangle the bobina. The josi does not need the bobina. If something is obstetric and it awake the elizabeth then the elizabeth alibi the bobina. If something is unsighted then it dangle the ninnette. If something dangle the ninnette then it awake the elizabeth. If something dangle the bobina and it dangle the elizabeth then it alibi the elizabeth. If something is unsighted and it does not need the elizabeth then it awake the josi. If something awake the elizabeth and it awake the josi then the josi is listless. The bobina does not see the elizabeth.", "logic": "\nUnsighted(bobina)\nnot Obstetric(bobina)\nDangle(bobina, elizabeth)\nAlibi(bobina, elizabeth)\nAlibi(bobina, josi)\nAwake(bobina, josi)\nObstetric(ninnette)\nAlibi(ninnette, elizabeth)\nAlibi(ninnette, josi)\nAwake(ninnette, josi)\nnot Obstetric(elizabeth)\nDangle(elizabeth, bobina)\nAwake(elizabeth, josi)\nDangle(josi, bobina)\nnot Alibi(josi, bobina)\nforall x (Obstetric(x) and Awake(x, elizabeth) -> Alibi(elizabeth, bobina))\nforall x (Unsighted(x) -> Dangle(x, ninnette))\nforall x (Dangle(x, ninnette) -> Awake(x, elizabeth))\nforall x (Dangle(x, bobina) and Dangle(x, elizabeth) -> Alibi(x, elizabeth))\nforall x (Unsighted(x) and not Alibi(x, elizabeth) -> Awake(x, josi))\nforall x (Awake(x, elizabeth) and Awake(x, josi) -> Listless(josi))\n\nnot Awake(bobina, elizabeth)\n\nUnsighted(bobina) and forall x (Unsighted(x) -> Dangle(x, ninnette)) -> therefore Dangle(bobina, ninnette) Dangle(bobina, ninnette) and forall x (Dangle(x, ninnette) -> Awake(x, elizabeth)) -> therefore Awake(bobina, elizabeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The helene is concurrent. The helene is not unplumbed. The helene affix the eba. The helene bitt the eba. The helene bitt the elsa. The helene barrel the elsa. The lauraine is unplumbed. The lauraine bitt the eba. The lauraine bitt the elsa. The lauraine barrel the elsa. The eba is not unplumbed. The eba affix the helene. The eba barrel the elsa. The elsa affix the helene. The elsa does not need the helene. If something is unplumbed and it barrel the eba then the eba bitt the helene. If something is concurrent then it affix the lauraine. If something affix the lauraine then it barrel the eba. If something affix the helene and it affix the eba then it bitt the eba. If something is concurrent and it does not need the eba then it barrel the elsa. If something barrel the eba and it barrel the elsa then the elsa is going. The elsa is going.", "logic": "\nConcurrent(helene)\nnot Unplumbed(helene)\nAffix(helene, eba)\nBitt(helene, eba)\nBitt(helene, elsa)\nBarrel(helene, elsa)\nUnplumbed(lauraine)\nBitt(lauraine, eba)\nBitt(lauraine, elsa)\nBarrel(lauraine, elsa)\nnot Unplumbed(eba)\nAffix(eba, helene)\nBarrel(eba, elsa)\nAffix(elsa, helene)\nnot Bitt(elsa, helene)\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) and Barrel(x, eba) -> Bitt(eba, helene))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) -> Affix(x, lauraine))\nforall x (Affix(x, lauraine) -> Barrel(x, eba))\nforall x (Affix(x, helene) and Affix(x, eba) -> Bitt(x, eba))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) and not Bitt(x, eba) -> Barrel(x, elsa))\nforall x (Barrel(x, eba) and Barrel(x, elsa) -> Going(elsa))\n\nGoing(elsa)\n\nConcurrent(helene) and forall x (Concurrent(x) -> Affix(x, lauraine)) -> therefore Affix(helene, lauraine) Affix(helene, lauraine) and forall x (Affix(x, lauraine) -> Barrel(x, eba)) -> therefore Barrel(helene, eba) Barrel(helene, eba) and Barrel(helene, elsa) and forall x (Barrel(x, eba) and Barrel(x, elsa) -> Going(elsa)) -> therefore Going(elsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The dione is upmost. The dione is not fond. The dione scuffle the bren. The dione major the bren. The dione major the mamie. The dione demonetise the mamie. The emery is fond. The emery major the bren. The emery major the mamie. The emery demonetise the mamie. The bren is not fond. The bren scuffle the dione. The bren demonetise the mamie. The mamie scuffle the dione. The mamie does not need the dione. If something is fond and it demonetise the bren then the bren major the dione. If something is upmost then it scuffle the emery. If something scuffle the emery then it demonetise the bren. If something scuffle the dione and it scuffle the bren then it major the bren. If something is upmost and it does not need the bren then it demonetise the mamie. If something demonetise the bren and it demonetise the mamie then the mamie is saving. The mamie is not saving.", "logic": "\nUpmost(dione)\nnot Fond(dione)\nScuffle(dione, bren)\nMajor(dione, bren)\nMajor(dione, mamie)\nDemonetise(dione, mamie)\nFond(emery)\nMajor(emery, bren)\nMajor(emery, mamie)\nDemonetise(emery, mamie)\nnot Fond(bren)\nScuffle(bren, dione)\nDemonetise(bren, mamie)\nScuffle(mamie, dione)\nnot Major(mamie, dione)\nforall x (Fond(x) and Demonetise(x, bren) -> Major(bren, dione))\nforall x (Upmost(x) -> Scuffle(x, emery))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, emery) -> Demonetise(x, bren))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, dione) and Scuffle(x, bren) -> Major(x, bren))\nforall x (Upmost(x) and not Major(x, bren) -> Demonetise(x, mamie))\nforall x (Demonetise(x, bren) and Demonetise(x, mamie) -> Saving(mamie))\n\nnot Saving(mamie)\n\nUpmost(dione) and forall x (Upmost(x) -> Scuffle(x, emery)) -> therefore Scuffle(dione, emery) Scuffle(dione, emery) and forall x (Scuffle(x, emery) -> Demonetise(x, bren)) -> therefore Demonetise(dione, bren) Demonetise(dione, bren) and Demonetise(dione, mamie) and forall x (Demonetise(x, bren) and Demonetise(x, mamie) -> Saving(mamie)) -> therefore Saving(mamie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The shamus is rimless. The shamus is not steepish. The shamus squeegee the stavros. The shamus shroud the stavros. The shamus shroud the beatriz. The shamus telecast the beatriz. The letitia is steepish. The letitia shroud the stavros. The letitia shroud the beatriz. The letitia telecast the beatriz. The stavros is not steepish. The stavros squeegee the shamus. The stavros telecast the beatriz. The beatriz squeegee the shamus. The beatriz does not need the shamus. If something is steepish and it telecast the stavros then the stavros shroud the shamus. If something is rimless then it squeegee the letitia. If something squeegee the letitia then it telecast the stavros. If something squeegee the shamus and it squeegee the stavros then it shroud the stavros. If something is rimless and it does not need the stavros then it telecast the beatriz. If something telecast the stavros and it telecast the beatriz then the beatriz is polluted. The beatriz does not see the stavros.", "logic": "\nRimless(shamus)\nnot Steepish(shamus)\nSqueegee(shamus, stavros)\nShroud(shamus, stavros)\nShroud(shamus, beatriz)\nTelecast(shamus, beatriz)\nSteepish(letitia)\nShroud(letitia, stavros)\nShroud(letitia, beatriz)\nTelecast(letitia, beatriz)\nnot Steepish(stavros)\nSqueegee(stavros, shamus)\nTelecast(stavros, beatriz)\nSqueegee(beatriz, shamus)\nnot Shroud(beatriz, shamus)\nforall x (Steepish(x) and Telecast(x, stavros) -> Shroud(stavros, shamus))\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> Squeegee(x, letitia))\nforall x (Squeegee(x, letitia) -> Telecast(x, stavros))\nforall x (Squeegee(x, shamus) and Squeegee(x, stavros) -> Shroud(x, stavros))\nforall x (Rimless(x) and not Shroud(x, stavros) -> Telecast(x, beatriz))\nforall x (Telecast(x, stavros) and Telecast(x, beatriz) -> Polluted(beatriz))\n\nnot Telecast(beatriz, stavros)\n\nforall x (Squeegee(x, letitia) -> Telecast(x, stavros)) <- forall x (Rimless(x) -> Squeegee(x, letitia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The geoffrey is gangrenous. The geoffrey is not opportune. The geoffrey subject the thorndike. The geoffrey delocalize the thorndike. The geoffrey delocalize the durward. The geoffrey barber the durward. The berk is opportune. The berk delocalize the thorndike. The berk delocalize the durward. The berk barber the durward. The thorndike is not opportune. The thorndike subject the geoffrey. The thorndike barber the durward. The durward subject the geoffrey. The durward does not need the geoffrey. If something is opportune and it barber the thorndike then the thorndike delocalize the geoffrey. If something is gangrenous then it subject the berk. If something subject the berk then it barber the thorndike. If something subject the geoffrey and it subject the thorndike then it delocalize the thorndike. If something is gangrenous and it does not need the thorndike then it barber the durward. If something barber the thorndike and it barber the durward then the durward is egregious. The durward barber the durward.", "logic": "\nGangrenous(geoffrey)\nnot Opportune(geoffrey)\nSubject(geoffrey, thorndike)\nDelocalize(geoffrey, thorndike)\nDelocalize(geoffrey, durward)\nBarber(geoffrey, durward)\nOpportune(berk)\nDelocalize(berk, thorndike)\nDelocalize(berk, durward)\nBarber(berk, durward)\nnot Opportune(thorndike)\nSubject(thorndike, geoffrey)\nBarber(thorndike, durward)\nSubject(durward, geoffrey)\nnot Delocalize(durward, geoffrey)\nforall x (Opportune(x) and Barber(x, thorndike) -> Delocalize(thorndike, geoffrey))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) -> Subject(x, berk))\nforall x (Subject(x, berk) -> Barber(x, thorndike))\nforall x (Subject(x, geoffrey) and Subject(x, thorndike) -> Delocalize(x, thorndike))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) and not Delocalize(x, thorndike) -> Barber(x, durward))\nforall x (Barber(x, thorndike) and Barber(x, durward) -> Egregious(durward))\n\nBarber(durward, durward)\n\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) and not Delocalize(x, thorndike) -> Barber(x, durward)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The theodore is mixable. The theodore is not callous. The theodore divine the dell. The theodore thwack the dell. The theodore thwack the reagan. The theodore obstruct the reagan. The raoul is callous. The raoul thwack the dell. The raoul thwack the reagan. The raoul obstruct the reagan. The dell is not callous. The dell divine the theodore. The dell obstruct the reagan. The reagan divine the theodore. The reagan does not need the theodore. If something is callous and it obstruct the dell then the dell thwack the theodore. If something is mixable then it divine the raoul. If something divine the raoul then it obstruct the dell. If something divine the theodore and it divine the dell then it thwack the dell. If something is mixable and it does not need the dell then it obstruct the reagan. If something obstruct the dell and it obstruct the reagan then the reagan is skimmed. The dell does not need the theodore.", "logic": "\nMixable(theodore)\nnot Callous(theodore)\nDivine(theodore, dell)\nThwack(theodore, dell)\nThwack(theodore, reagan)\nObstruct(theodore, reagan)\nCallous(raoul)\nThwack(raoul, dell)\nThwack(raoul, reagan)\nObstruct(raoul, reagan)\nnot Callous(dell)\nDivine(dell, theodore)\nObstruct(dell, reagan)\nDivine(reagan, theodore)\nnot Thwack(reagan, theodore)\nforall x (Callous(x) and Obstruct(x, dell) -> Thwack(dell, theodore))\nforall x (Mixable(x) -> Divine(x, raoul))\nforall x (Divine(x, raoul) -> Obstruct(x, dell))\nforall x (Divine(x, theodore) and Divine(x, dell) -> Thwack(x, dell))\nforall x (Mixable(x) and not Thwack(x, dell) -> Obstruct(x, reagan))\nforall x (Obstruct(x, dell) and Obstruct(x, reagan) -> Skimmed(reagan))\n\nnot Thwack(dell, theodore)\n\nforall x (Callous(x) and Obstruct(x, dell) -> Thwack(dell, theodore)) <- forall x (Divine(x, raoul) -> Obstruct(x, dell)) <- forall x (Mixable(x) -> Divine(x, raoul)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The glen is seventeen. The glen is not fibreoptic. The glen autograph the levin. The glen debut the levin. The glen debut the dory. The glen mistake the dory. The sileas is fibreoptic. The sileas debut the levin. The sileas debut the dory. The sileas mistake the dory. The levin is not fibreoptic. The levin autograph the glen. The levin mistake the dory. The dory autograph the glen. The dory does not need the glen. If something is fibreoptic and it mistake the levin then the levin debut the glen. If something is seventeen then it autograph the sileas. If something autograph the sileas then it mistake the levin. If something autograph the glen and it autograph the levin then it debut the levin. If something is seventeen and it does not need the levin then it mistake the dory. If something mistake the levin and it mistake the dory then the dory is oval. The dory autograph the sileas.", "logic": "\nSeventeen(glen)\nnot Fibreoptic(glen)\nAutograph(glen, levin)\nDebut(glen, levin)\nDebut(glen, dory)\nMistake(glen, dory)\nFibreoptic(sileas)\nDebut(sileas, levin)\nDebut(sileas, dory)\nMistake(sileas, dory)\nnot Fibreoptic(levin)\nAutograph(levin, glen)\nMistake(levin, dory)\nAutograph(dory, glen)\nnot Debut(dory, glen)\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) and Mistake(x, levin) -> Debut(levin, glen))\nforall x (Seventeen(x) -> Autograph(x, sileas))\nforall x (Autograph(x, sileas) -> Mistake(x, levin))\nforall x (Autograph(x, glen) and Autograph(x, levin) -> Debut(x, levin))\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and not Debut(x, levin) -> Mistake(x, dory))\nforall x (Mistake(x, levin) and Mistake(x, dory) -> Oval(dory))\n\nAutograph(dory, sileas)\n\nforall x (Seventeen(x) -> Autograph(x, sileas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The thia is lilac. The thia is not springless. The thia laugh the ruperta. The thia persevere the ruperta. The thia persevere the joycelin. The thia benumb the joycelin. The douglass is springless. The douglass persevere the ruperta. The douglass persevere the joycelin. The douglass benumb the joycelin. The ruperta is not springless. The ruperta laugh the thia. The ruperta benumb the joycelin. The joycelin laugh the thia. The joycelin does not need the thia. If something is springless and it benumb the ruperta then the ruperta persevere the thia. If something is lilac then it laugh the douglass. If something laugh the douglass then it benumb the ruperta. If something laugh the thia and it laugh the ruperta then it persevere the ruperta. If something is lilac and it does not need the ruperta then it benumb the joycelin. If something benumb the ruperta and it benumb the joycelin then the joycelin is unmalted. The ruperta is not kind.", "logic": "\nLilac(thia)\nnot Springless(thia)\nLaugh(thia, ruperta)\nPersevere(thia, ruperta)\nPersevere(thia, joycelin)\nBenumb(thia, joycelin)\nSpringless(douglass)\nPersevere(douglass, ruperta)\nPersevere(douglass, joycelin)\nBenumb(douglass, joycelin)\nnot Springless(ruperta)\nLaugh(ruperta, thia)\nBenumb(ruperta, joycelin)\nLaugh(joycelin, thia)\nnot Persevere(joycelin, thia)\nforall x (Springless(x) and Benumb(x, ruperta) -> Persevere(ruperta, thia))\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> Laugh(x, douglass))\nforall x (Laugh(x, douglass) -> Benumb(x, ruperta))\nforall x (Laugh(x, thia) and Laugh(x, ruperta) -> Persevere(x, ruperta))\nforall x (Lilac(x) and not Persevere(x, ruperta) -> Benumb(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Benumb(x, ruperta) and Benumb(x, joycelin) -> Unmalted(joycelin))\n\nnot Kind(ruperta)\n\nnot Kind(ruperta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The yancey is agnate. The yancey is not bolivian. The yancey lasso the dareen. The yancey inflate the dareen. The yancey inflate the carlos. The yancey vociferate the carlos. The erinna is bolivian. The erinna inflate the dareen. The erinna inflate the carlos. The erinna vociferate the carlos. The dareen is not bolivian. The dareen lasso the yancey. The dareen vociferate the carlos. The carlos lasso the yancey. The carlos does not need the yancey. If something is bolivian and it vociferate the dareen then the dareen inflate the yancey. If something is agnate then it lasso the erinna. If something lasso the erinna then it vociferate the dareen. If something lasso the yancey and it lasso the dareen then it inflate the dareen. If something is agnate and it does not need the dareen then it vociferate the carlos. If something vociferate the dareen and it vociferate the carlos then the carlos is apocrine. The yancey is nice.", "logic": "\nAgnate(yancey)\nnot Bolivian(yancey)\nLasso(yancey, dareen)\nInflate(yancey, dareen)\nInflate(yancey, carlos)\nVociferate(yancey, carlos)\nBolivian(erinna)\nInflate(erinna, dareen)\nInflate(erinna, carlos)\nVociferate(erinna, carlos)\nnot Bolivian(dareen)\nLasso(dareen, yancey)\nVociferate(dareen, carlos)\nLasso(carlos, yancey)\nnot Inflate(carlos, yancey)\nforall x (Bolivian(x) and Vociferate(x, dareen) -> Inflate(dareen, yancey))\nforall x (Agnate(x) -> Lasso(x, erinna))\nforall x (Lasso(x, erinna) -> Vociferate(x, dareen))\nforall x (Lasso(x, yancey) and Lasso(x, dareen) -> Inflate(x, dareen))\nforall x (Agnate(x) and not Inflate(x, dareen) -> Vociferate(x, carlos))\nforall x (Vociferate(x, dareen) and Vociferate(x, carlos) -> Apocrine(carlos))\n\nNice(yancey)\n\nNice(yancey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The edy is copacetic. The edy is not forehand. The edy asseverate the ava. The edy disgust the ava. The edy disgust the carlyle. The edy poise the carlyle. The marian is forehand. The marian disgust the ava. The marian disgust the carlyle. The marian poise the carlyle. The ava is not forehand. The ava asseverate the edy. The ava poise the carlyle. The carlyle asseverate the edy. The carlyle does not need the edy. If something is forehand and it poise the ava then the ava disgust the edy. If something is copacetic then it asseverate the marian. If something asseverate the marian then it poise the ava. If something asseverate the edy and it asseverate the ava then it disgust the ava. If something is copacetic and it does not need the ava then it poise the carlyle. If something poise the ava and it poise the carlyle then the carlyle is egoistic. The carlyle does not like the ava.", "logic": "\nCopacetic(edy)\nnot Forehand(edy)\nAsseverate(edy, ava)\nDisgust(edy, ava)\nDisgust(edy, carlyle)\nPoise(edy, carlyle)\nForehand(marian)\nDisgust(marian, ava)\nDisgust(marian, carlyle)\nPoise(marian, carlyle)\nnot Forehand(ava)\nAsseverate(ava, edy)\nPoise(ava, carlyle)\nAsseverate(carlyle, edy)\nnot Disgust(carlyle, edy)\nforall x (Forehand(x) and Poise(x, ava) -> Disgust(ava, edy))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Asseverate(x, marian))\nforall x (Asseverate(x, marian) -> Poise(x, ava))\nforall x (Asseverate(x, edy) and Asseverate(x, ava) -> Disgust(x, ava))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) and not Disgust(x, ava) -> Poise(x, carlyle))\nforall x (Poise(x, ava) and Poise(x, carlyle) -> Egoistic(carlyle))\n\nnot Asseverate(carlyle, ava)\n\nnot Asseverate(carlyle, ava) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The bronson is choragic. The bronson is not gluttonous. The bronson deliberate the serena. The bronson chauffeur the serena. The bronson chauffeur the paten. The bronson belly the paten. The zippy is gluttonous. The zippy chauffeur the serena. The zippy chauffeur the paten. The zippy belly the paten. The serena is not gluttonous. The serena deliberate the bronson. The serena belly the paten. The paten deliberate the bronson. The paten does not need the bronson. If something is gluttonous and it belly the serena then the serena chauffeur the bronson. If something is choragic then it deliberate the zippy. If something deliberate the zippy then it belly the serena. If something deliberate the bronson and it deliberate the serena then it chauffeur the serena. If something is choragic and it does not need the serena then it belly the paten. If something belly the serena and it belly the paten then the paten is humorless. The zippy is humorless.", "logic": "\nChoragic(bronson)\nnot Gluttonous(bronson)\nDeliberate(bronson, serena)\nChauffeur(bronson, serena)\nChauffeur(bronson, paten)\nBelly(bronson, paten)\nGluttonous(zippy)\nChauffeur(zippy, serena)\nChauffeur(zippy, paten)\nBelly(zippy, paten)\nnot Gluttonous(serena)\nDeliberate(serena, bronson)\nBelly(serena, paten)\nDeliberate(paten, bronson)\nnot Chauffeur(paten, bronson)\nforall x (Gluttonous(x) and Belly(x, serena) -> Chauffeur(serena, bronson))\nforall x (Choragic(x) -> Deliberate(x, zippy))\nforall x (Deliberate(x, zippy) -> Belly(x, serena))\nforall x (Deliberate(x, bronson) and Deliberate(x, serena) -> Chauffeur(x, serena))\nforall x (Choragic(x) and not Chauffeur(x, serena) -> Belly(x, paten))\nforall x (Belly(x, serena) and Belly(x, paten) -> Humorless(paten))\n\nHumorless(zippy)\n\nHumorless(zippy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-136"} {"premises": "The harcourt is plummy. If someone is maximal then they are not serial. If someone is definite and sterile then they are serial. If someone is plummy then they are definite. All plummy people are not maximal. If someone is maximal then they are sterile. Nice people are sterile. The harcourt is plummy.", "logic": "\nPlummy(harcourt)\nforall x (Maximal(x) -> not Serial(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) and Sterile(x) -> Serial(x))\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> not Maximal(x))\nforall x (Maximal(x) -> Sterile(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) -> Sterile(x))\n\nPlummy(harcourt)\n\ntherefore Plummy(harcourt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The agata is bonkers. If someone is loony then they are not delineate. If someone is concerted and unmilitary then they are delineate. If someone is bonkers then they are concerted. All bonkers people are not loony. If someone is loony then they are unmilitary. Nice people are unmilitary. The agata is not bonkers.", "logic": "\nBonkers(agata)\nforall x (Loony(x) -> not Delineate(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) and Unmilitary(x) -> Delineate(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> Concerted(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> not Loony(x))\nforall x (Loony(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\n\nnot Bonkers(agata)\n\ntherefore Bonkers(agata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The darren is shadowy. If someone is convincing then they are not balletic. If someone is flaring and attachable then they are balletic. If someone is shadowy then they are flaring. All shadowy people are not convincing. If someone is convincing then they are attachable. Nice people are attachable. The darren is flaring.", "logic": "\nShadowy(darren)\nforall x (Convincing(x) -> not Balletic(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Attachable(x) -> Balletic(x))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Flaring(x))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> not Convincing(x))\nforall x (Convincing(x) -> Attachable(x))\nforall x (Flaring(x) -> Attachable(x))\n\nFlaring(darren)\n\nShadowy(darren) and forall x (Shadowy(x) -> Flaring(x)) -> therefore Flaring(darren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The marjorie is eudemonic. If someone is imbalanced then they are not nisi. If someone is centennial and dislocated then they are nisi. If someone is eudemonic then they are centennial. All eudemonic people are not imbalanced. If someone is imbalanced then they are dislocated. Nice people are dislocated. The marjorie is imbalanced.", "logic": "\nEudemonic(marjorie)\nforall x (Imbalanced(x) -> not Nisi(x))\nforall x (Centennial(x) and Dislocated(x) -> Nisi(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) -> Centennial(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) -> not Imbalanced(x))\nforall x (Imbalanced(x) -> Dislocated(x))\nforall x (Centennial(x) -> Dislocated(x))\n\nImbalanced(marjorie)\n\nEudemonic(marjorie) and forall x (Eudemonic(x) -> not Imbalanced(x)) -> therefore not Imbalanced(marjorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The vinnie is amber. If someone is impenitent then they are not cosmetic. If someone is culpable and aspirant then they are cosmetic. If someone is amber then they are culpable. All amber people are not impenitent. If someone is impenitent then they are aspirant. Nice people are aspirant. The vinnie is aspirant.", "logic": "\nAmber(vinnie)\nforall x (Impenitent(x) -> not Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Culpable(x) and Aspirant(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Amber(x) -> Culpable(x))\nforall x (Amber(x) -> not Impenitent(x))\nforall x (Impenitent(x) -> Aspirant(x))\nforall x (Culpable(x) -> Aspirant(x))\n\nAspirant(vinnie)\n\nAmber(vinnie) and forall x (Amber(x) -> Culpable(x)) -> therefore Culpable(vinnie) Culpable(vinnie) and forall x (Culpable(x) -> Aspirant(x)) -> therefore Aspirant(vinnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The jeffie is presumable. If someone is genetical then they are not undeceived. If someone is gandhian and xxxviii then they are undeceived. If someone is presumable then they are gandhian. All presumable people are not genetical. If someone is genetical then they are xxxviii. Nice people are xxxviii. The jeffie is not xxxviii.", "logic": "\nPresumable(jeffie)\nforall x (Genetical(x) -> not Undeceived(x))\nforall x (Gandhian(x) and Xxxviii(x) -> Undeceived(x))\nforall x (Presumable(x) -> Gandhian(x))\nforall x (Presumable(x) -> not Genetical(x))\nforall x (Genetical(x) -> Xxxviii(x))\nforall x (Gandhian(x) -> Xxxviii(x))\n\nnot Xxxviii(jeffie)\n\nPresumable(jeffie) and forall x (Presumable(x) -> Gandhian(x)) -> therefore Gandhian(jeffie) Gandhian(jeffie) and forall x (Gandhian(x) -> Xxxviii(x)) -> therefore Xxxviii(jeffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The ortensia is unpatented. If someone is extremist then they are not veteran. If someone is apodictic and trifoliate then they are veteran. If someone is unpatented then they are apodictic. All unpatented people are not extremist. If someone is extremist then they are trifoliate. Nice people are trifoliate. The ortensia is veteran.", "logic": "\nUnpatented(ortensia)\nforall x (Extremist(x) -> not Veteran(x))\nforall x (Apodictic(x) and Trifoliate(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Unpatented(x) -> Apodictic(x))\nforall x (Unpatented(x) -> not Extremist(x))\nforall x (Extremist(x) -> Trifoliate(x))\nforall x (Apodictic(x) -> Trifoliate(x))\n\nVeteran(ortensia)\n\nUnpatented(ortensia) and forall x (Unpatented(x) -> Apodictic(x)) -> therefore Apodictic(ortensia) Unpatented(ortensia) and forall x (Unpatented(x) -> Apodictic(x)) -> therefore Apodictic(ortensia) Apodictic(ortensia) and forall x (Apodictic(x) -> Trifoliate(x)) -> therefore Trifoliate(ortensia) Apodictic(ortensia) and Trifoliate(ortensia) and forall x (Apodictic(x) and Trifoliate(x) -> Veteran(x)) -> therefore Veteran(ortensia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The carmen is deducible. If someone is goddamned then they are not soviet. If someone is exploded and undigested then they are soviet. If someone is deducible then they are exploded. All deducible people are not goddamned. If someone is goddamned then they are undigested. Nice people are undigested. The carmen is not soviet.", "logic": "\nDeducible(carmen)\nforall x (Goddamned(x) -> not Soviet(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) and Undigested(x) -> Soviet(x))\nforall x (Deducible(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Deducible(x) -> not Goddamned(x))\nforall x (Goddamned(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Undigested(x))\n\nnot Soviet(carmen)\n\nDeducible(carmen) and forall x (Deducible(x) -> Exploded(x)) -> therefore Exploded(carmen) Deducible(carmen) and forall x (Deducible(x) -> Exploded(x)) -> therefore Exploded(carmen) Exploded(carmen) and forall x (Exploded(x) -> Undigested(x)) -> therefore Undigested(carmen) Exploded(carmen) and Undigested(carmen) and forall x (Exploded(x) and Undigested(x) -> Soviet(x)) -> therefore Soviet(carmen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The enya is formosan. If someone is gargantuan then they are not exoteric. If someone is asynergic and capricious then they are exoteric. If someone is formosan then they are asynergic. All formosan people are not gargantuan. If someone is gargantuan then they are capricious. Nice people are capricious. The enya does not see the enya.", "logic": "\nFormosan(enya)\nforall x (Gargantuan(x) -> not Exoteric(x))\nforall x (Asynergic(x) and Capricious(x) -> Exoteric(x))\nforall x (Formosan(x) -> Asynergic(x))\nforall x (Formosan(x) -> not Gargantuan(x))\nforall x (Gargantuan(x) -> Capricious(x))\nforall x (Asynergic(x) -> Capricious(x))\n\nnot Sees(enya, enya)\n\nnot Sees(enya, enya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The noelani is laputan. If someone is unrenewed then they are not needy. If someone is guyanese and endermatic then they are needy. If someone is laputan then they are guyanese. All laputan people are not unrenewed. If someone is unrenewed then they are endermatic. Nice people are endermatic. The noelani eats the noelani.", "logic": "\nLaputan(noelani)\nforall x (Unrenewed(x) -> not Needy(x))\nforall x (Guyanese(x) and Endermatic(x) -> Needy(x))\nforall x (Laputan(x) -> Guyanese(x))\nforall x (Laputan(x) -> not Unrenewed(x))\nforall x (Unrenewed(x) -> Endermatic(x))\nforall x (Guyanese(x) -> Endermatic(x))\n\nEats(noelani, noelani)\n\nEats(noelani, noelani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-20"} {"premises": "The janina is sloshed. The janina is antinomian. The janina is not botryoidal. The janina does not need the kalman. The harlene astonish the janina. The kalman is not antinomian. The kalman is not uneager. If something fasten the kalman then the kalman slander the janina. If something astonish the kalman and the kalman is uneager then it astonish the janina. If something slander the harlene and it fasten the harlene then it is not pink. If something slander the janina then it slander the harlene. If something astonish the janina then it fasten the kalman. If something is botryoidal then it does not visit the kalman. The kalman is not uneager.", "logic": "\nSloshed(janina)\nAntinomian(janina)\nnot Botryoidal(janina)\nnot Slander(janina, kalman)\nAstonish(harlene, janina)\nnot Antinomian(kalman)\nnot Uneager(kalman)\nforall x (Fasten(x, kalman) -> Slander(kalman, janina))\nforall x (Astonish(x, kalman) and Uneager(kalman) -> Astonish(x, janina))\nforall x (Slander(x, harlene) and Fasten(x, harlene) -> not Pink(x))\nforall x (Slander(x, janina) -> Slander(x, harlene))\nforall x (Astonish(x, janina) -> Fasten(x, kalman))\nforall x (Botryoidal(x) -> not Astonish(x, kalman))\n\nnot Uneager(kalman)\n\ntherefore not Uneager(kalman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The nanice is sanguine. The nanice is operatic. The nanice is not homocercal. The nanice does not need the alphonso. The demetri catcall the nanice. The alphonso is not operatic. The alphonso is not alkaline. If something gazump the alphonso then the alphonso glamourize the nanice. If something catcall the alphonso and the alphonso is alkaline then it catcall the nanice. If something glamourize the demetri and it gazump the demetri then it is not bichrome. If something glamourize the nanice then it glamourize the demetri. If something catcall the nanice then it gazump the alphonso. If something is homocercal then it does not visit the alphonso. The nanice is not operatic.", "logic": "\nSanguine(nanice)\nOperatic(nanice)\nnot Homocercal(nanice)\nnot Glamourize(nanice, alphonso)\nCatcall(demetri, nanice)\nnot Operatic(alphonso)\nnot Alkaline(alphonso)\nforall x (Gazump(x, alphonso) -> Glamourize(alphonso, nanice))\nforall x (Catcall(x, alphonso) and Alkaline(alphonso) -> Catcall(x, nanice))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, demetri) and Gazump(x, demetri) -> not Bichrome(x))\nforall x (Glamourize(x, nanice) -> Glamourize(x, demetri))\nforall x (Catcall(x, nanice) -> Gazump(x, alphonso))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) -> not Catcall(x, alphonso))\n\nnot Operatic(nanice)\n\ntherefore Operatic(nanice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The homer is benefic. The homer is presumable. The homer is not eristical. The homer does not need the arabela. The julietta purvey the homer. The arabela is not presumable. The arabela is not namibian. If something bacterise the arabela then the arabela detoxicate the homer. If something purvey the arabela and the arabela is namibian then it purvey the homer. If something detoxicate the julietta and it bacterise the julietta then it is not unfunny. If something detoxicate the homer then it detoxicate the julietta. If something purvey the homer then it bacterise the arabela. If something is eristical then it does not visit the arabela. The julietta bacterise the arabela.", "logic": "\nBenefic(homer)\nPresumable(homer)\nnot Eristical(homer)\nnot Detoxicate(homer, arabela)\nPurvey(julietta, homer)\nnot Presumable(arabela)\nnot Namibian(arabela)\nforall x (Bacterise(x, arabela) -> Detoxicate(arabela, homer))\nforall x (Purvey(x, arabela) and Namibian(arabela) -> Purvey(x, homer))\nforall x (Detoxicate(x, julietta) and Bacterise(x, julietta) -> not Unfunny(x))\nforall x (Detoxicate(x, homer) -> Detoxicate(x, julietta))\nforall x (Purvey(x, homer) -> Bacterise(x, arabela))\nforall x (Eristical(x) -> not Purvey(x, arabela))\n\nBacterise(julietta, arabela)\n\nPurvey(julietta, homer) and forall x (Purvey(x, homer) -> Bacterise(x, arabela)) -> therefore Bacterise(julietta, arabela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The rollin is vigilant. The rollin is unarguable. The rollin is not latest. The rollin does not need the marketa. The kaitlyn farm the rollin. The marketa is not unarguable. The marketa is not confirmed. If something harbor the marketa then the marketa ting the rollin. If something farm the marketa and the marketa is confirmed then it farm the rollin. If something ting the kaitlyn and it harbor the kaitlyn then it is not repellent. If something ting the rollin then it ting the kaitlyn. If something farm the rollin then it harbor the marketa. If something is latest then it does not visit the marketa. The kaitlyn does not see the marketa.", "logic": "\nVigilant(rollin)\nUnarguable(rollin)\nnot Latest(rollin)\nnot Ting(rollin, marketa)\nFarm(kaitlyn, rollin)\nnot Unarguable(marketa)\nnot Confirmed(marketa)\nforall x (Harbor(x, marketa) -> Ting(marketa, rollin))\nforall x (Farm(x, marketa) and Confirmed(marketa) -> Farm(x, rollin))\nforall x (Ting(x, kaitlyn) and Harbor(x, kaitlyn) -> not Repellent(x))\nforall x (Ting(x, rollin) -> Ting(x, kaitlyn))\nforall x (Farm(x, rollin) -> Harbor(x, marketa))\nforall x (Latest(x) -> not Farm(x, marketa))\n\nnot Harbor(kaitlyn, marketa)\n\nFarm(kaitlyn, rollin) and forall x (Farm(x, rollin) -> Harbor(x, marketa)) -> therefore Harbor(kaitlyn, marketa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The jacquetta is riemannian. The jacquetta is exportable. The jacquetta is not ridged. The jacquetta does not need the yanaton. The eula lisp the jacquetta. The yanaton is not exportable. The yanaton is not hiemal. If something exuviate the yanaton then the yanaton upset the jacquetta. If something lisp the yanaton and the yanaton is hiemal then it lisp the jacquetta. If something upset the eula and it exuviate the eula then it is not patronymic. If something upset the jacquetta then it upset the eula. If something lisp the jacquetta then it exuviate the yanaton. If something is ridged then it does not visit the yanaton. The yanaton upset the jacquetta.", "logic": "\nRiemannian(jacquetta)\nExportable(jacquetta)\nnot Ridged(jacquetta)\nnot Upset(jacquetta, yanaton)\nLisp(eula, jacquetta)\nnot Exportable(yanaton)\nnot Hiemal(yanaton)\nforall x (Exuviate(x, yanaton) -> Upset(yanaton, jacquetta))\nforall x (Lisp(x, yanaton) and Hiemal(yanaton) -> Lisp(x, jacquetta))\nforall x (Upset(x, eula) and Exuviate(x, eula) -> not Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Upset(x, jacquetta) -> Upset(x, eula))\nforall x (Lisp(x, jacquetta) -> Exuviate(x, yanaton))\nforall x (Ridged(x) -> not Lisp(x, yanaton))\n\nUpset(yanaton, jacquetta)\n\nLisp(eula, jacquetta) and forall x (Lisp(x, jacquetta) -> Exuviate(x, yanaton)) -> therefore Exuviate(eula, yanaton) Exuviate(eula, yanaton) and forall x (Exuviate(x, yanaton) -> Upset(yanaton, jacquetta)) -> therefore Upset(yanaton, jacquetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The happy is leisured. The happy is branded. The happy is not centesimal. The happy does not need the brinkley. The norman plod the happy. The brinkley is not branded. The brinkley is not manifold. If something quench the brinkley then the brinkley despise the happy. If something plod the brinkley and the brinkley is manifold then it plod the happy. If something despise the norman and it quench the norman then it is not execrable. If something despise the happy then it despise the norman. If something plod the happy then it quench the brinkley. If something is centesimal then it does not visit the brinkley. The brinkley does not need the happy.", "logic": "\nLeisured(happy)\nBranded(happy)\nnot Centesimal(happy)\nnot Despise(happy, brinkley)\nPlod(norman, happy)\nnot Branded(brinkley)\nnot Manifold(brinkley)\nforall x (Quench(x, brinkley) -> Despise(brinkley, happy))\nforall x (Plod(x, brinkley) and Manifold(brinkley) -> Plod(x, happy))\nforall x (Despise(x, norman) and Quench(x, norman) -> not Execrable(x))\nforall x (Despise(x, happy) -> Despise(x, norman))\nforall x (Plod(x, happy) -> Quench(x, brinkley))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> not Plod(x, brinkley))\n\nnot Despise(brinkley, happy)\n\nPlod(norman, happy) and forall x (Plod(x, happy) -> Quench(x, brinkley)) -> therefore Quench(norman, brinkley) Quench(norman, brinkley) and forall x (Quench(x, brinkley) -> Despise(brinkley, happy)) -> therefore Despise(brinkley, happy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The suzy is negative. The suzy is unfirm. The suzy is not albuminous. The suzy does not need the caressa. The woodman vocalize the suzy. The caressa is not unfirm. The caressa is not appeasing. If something breakfast the caressa then the caressa unyoke the suzy. If something vocalize the caressa and the caressa is appeasing then it vocalize the suzy. If something unyoke the woodman and it breakfast the woodman then it is not immunised. If something unyoke the suzy then it unyoke the woodman. If something vocalize the suzy then it breakfast the caressa. If something is albuminous then it does not visit the caressa. The caressa unyoke the woodman.", "logic": "\nNegative(suzy)\nUnfirm(suzy)\nnot Albuminous(suzy)\nnot Unyoke(suzy, caressa)\nVocalize(woodman, suzy)\nnot Unfirm(caressa)\nnot Appeasing(caressa)\nforall x (Breakfast(x, caressa) -> Unyoke(caressa, suzy))\nforall x (Vocalize(x, caressa) and Appeasing(caressa) -> Vocalize(x, suzy))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, woodman) and Breakfast(x, woodman) -> not Immunised(x))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, suzy) -> Unyoke(x, woodman))\nforall x (Vocalize(x, suzy) -> Breakfast(x, caressa))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) -> not Vocalize(x, caressa))\n\nUnyoke(caressa, woodman)\n\nVocalize(woodman, suzy) and forall x (Vocalize(x, suzy) -> Breakfast(x, caressa)) -> therefore Breakfast(woodman, caressa) Breakfast(woodman, caressa) and forall x (Breakfast(x, caressa) -> Unyoke(caressa, suzy)) -> therefore Unyoke(caressa, suzy) Unyoke(caressa, suzy) and forall x (Unyoke(x, suzy) -> Unyoke(x, woodman)) -> therefore Unyoke(caressa, woodman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The ingelbert is chaldee. The ingelbert is cozy. The ingelbert is not shapely. The ingelbert does not need the zea. The adaline describe the ingelbert. The zea is not cozy. The zea is not tailless. If something bestialise the zea then the zea inundate the ingelbert. If something describe the zea and the zea is tailless then it describe the ingelbert. If something inundate the adaline and it bestialise the adaline then it is not measured. If something inundate the ingelbert then it inundate the adaline. If something describe the ingelbert then it bestialise the zea. If something is shapely then it does not visit the zea. The zea does not need the adaline.", "logic": "\nChaldee(ingelbert)\nCozy(ingelbert)\nnot Shapely(ingelbert)\nnot Inundate(ingelbert, zea)\nDescribe(adaline, ingelbert)\nnot Cozy(zea)\nnot Tailless(zea)\nforall x (Bestialise(x, zea) -> Inundate(zea, ingelbert))\nforall x (Describe(x, zea) and Tailless(zea) -> Describe(x, ingelbert))\nforall x (Inundate(x, adaline) and Bestialise(x, adaline) -> not Measured(x))\nforall x (Inundate(x, ingelbert) -> Inundate(x, adaline))\nforall x (Describe(x, ingelbert) -> Bestialise(x, zea))\nforall x (Shapely(x) -> not Describe(x, zea))\n\nnot Inundate(zea, adaline)\n\nDescribe(adaline, ingelbert) and forall x (Describe(x, ingelbert) -> Bestialise(x, zea)) -> therefore Bestialise(adaline, zea) Bestialise(adaline, zea) and forall x (Bestialise(x, zea) -> Inundate(zea, ingelbert)) -> therefore Inundate(zea, ingelbert) Inundate(zea, ingelbert) and forall x (Inundate(x, ingelbert) -> Inundate(x, adaline)) -> therefore Inundate(zea, adaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The laverne is inerrable. The laverne is unisexual. The laverne is not unalloyed. The laverne does not need the hamlin. The felicio gallivant the laverne. The hamlin is not unisexual. The hamlin is not terminated. If something scramble the hamlin then the hamlin research the laverne. If something gallivant the hamlin and the hamlin is terminated then it gallivant the laverne. If something research the felicio and it scramble the felicio then it is not damaging. If something research the laverne then it research the felicio. If something gallivant the laverne then it scramble the hamlin. If something is unalloyed then it does not visit the hamlin. The hamlin does not visit the laverne.", "logic": "\nInerrable(laverne)\nUnisexual(laverne)\nnot Unalloyed(laverne)\nnot Research(laverne, hamlin)\nGallivant(felicio, laverne)\nnot Unisexual(hamlin)\nnot Terminated(hamlin)\nforall x (Scramble(x, hamlin) -> Research(hamlin, laverne))\nforall x (Gallivant(x, hamlin) and Terminated(hamlin) -> Gallivant(x, laverne))\nforall x (Research(x, felicio) and Scramble(x, felicio) -> not Damaging(x))\nforall x (Research(x, laverne) -> Research(x, felicio))\nforall x (Gallivant(x, laverne) -> Scramble(x, hamlin))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) -> not Gallivant(x, hamlin))\n\nnot Gallivant(hamlin, laverne)\n\nforall x (Gallivant(x, hamlin) and Terminated(hamlin) -> Gallivant(x, laverne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The faina is blockaded. The faina is juicy. The faina is not lifelong. The faina does not need the stephani. The nela include the faina. The stephani is not juicy. The stephani is not unloving. If something copy the stephani then the stephani dismay the faina. If something include the stephani and the stephani is unloving then it include the faina. If something dismay the nela and it copy the nela then it is not stockinged. If something dismay the faina then it dismay the nela. If something include the faina then it copy the stephani. If something is lifelong then it does not visit the stephani. The faina copy the stephani.", "logic": "\nBlockaded(faina)\nJuicy(faina)\nnot Lifelong(faina)\nnot Dismay(faina, stephani)\nInclude(nela, faina)\nnot Juicy(stephani)\nnot Unloving(stephani)\nforall x (Copy(x, stephani) -> Dismay(stephani, faina))\nforall x (Include(x, stephani) and Unloving(stephani) -> Include(x, faina))\nforall x (Dismay(x, nela) and Copy(x, nela) -> not Stockinged(x))\nforall x (Dismay(x, faina) -> Dismay(x, nela))\nforall x (Include(x, faina) -> Copy(x, stephani))\nforall x (Lifelong(x) -> not Include(x, stephani))\n\nCopy(faina, stephani)\n\nforall x (Include(x, faina) -> Copy(x, stephani)) <- forall x (Include(x, stephani) and Unloving(stephani) -> Include(x, faina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The hildagard is prone. The hildagard is insoluble. The hildagard is not hefty. The hildagard does not need the kariotta. The norris proofread the hildagard. The kariotta is not insoluble. The kariotta is not maverick. If something pinkify the kariotta then the kariotta dissemble the hildagard. If something proofread the kariotta and the kariotta is maverick then it proofread the hildagard. If something dissemble the norris and it pinkify the norris then it is not biggish. If something dissemble the hildagard then it dissemble the norris. If something proofread the hildagard then it pinkify the kariotta. If something is hefty then it does not visit the kariotta. The hildagard does not need the norris.", "logic": "\nProne(hildagard)\nInsoluble(hildagard)\nnot Hefty(hildagard)\nnot Dissemble(hildagard, kariotta)\nProofread(norris, hildagard)\nnot Insoluble(kariotta)\nnot Maverick(kariotta)\nforall x (Pinkify(x, kariotta) -> Dissemble(kariotta, hildagard))\nforall x (Proofread(x, kariotta) and Maverick(kariotta) -> Proofread(x, hildagard))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, norris) and Pinkify(x, norris) -> not Biggish(x))\nforall x (Dissemble(x, hildagard) -> Dissemble(x, norris))\nforall x (Proofread(x, hildagard) -> Pinkify(x, kariotta))\nforall x (Hefty(x) -> not Proofread(x, kariotta))\n\nnot Dissemble(hildagard, norris)\n\nforall x (Dissemble(x, hildagard) -> Dissemble(x, norris)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The tabby is absorbing. The tabby is freelance. The tabby is not aflare. The tabby does not need the harriett. The emil barbarize the tabby. The harriett is not freelance. The harriett is not gingery. If something lipread the harriett then the harriett embalm the tabby. If something barbarize the harriett and the harriett is gingery then it barbarize the tabby. If something embalm the emil and it lipread the emil then it is not superior. If something embalm the tabby then it embalm the emil. If something barbarize the tabby then it lipread the harriett. If something is aflare then it does not visit the harriett. The tabby barbarize the tabby.", "logic": "\nAbsorbing(tabby)\nFreelance(tabby)\nnot Aflare(tabby)\nnot Embalm(tabby, harriett)\nBarbarize(emil, tabby)\nnot Freelance(harriett)\nnot Gingery(harriett)\nforall x (Lipread(x, harriett) -> Embalm(harriett, tabby))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, harriett) and Gingery(harriett) -> Barbarize(x, tabby))\nforall x (Embalm(x, emil) and Lipread(x, emil) -> not Superior(x))\nforall x (Embalm(x, tabby) -> Embalm(x, emil))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, tabby) -> Lipread(x, harriett))\nforall x (Aflare(x) -> not Barbarize(x, harriett))\n\nBarbarize(tabby, tabby)\n\nforall x (Barbarize(x, harriett) and Gingery(harriett) -> Barbarize(x, tabby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The gabi is queer. The gabi is swayback. The gabi is not bootless. The gabi does not need the larina. The olle stonewash the gabi. The larina is not swayback. The larina is not cumuliform. If something confection the larina then the larina advertise the gabi. If something stonewash the larina and the larina is cumuliform then it stonewash the gabi. If something advertise the olle and it confection the olle then it is not panicled. If something advertise the gabi then it advertise the olle. If something stonewash the gabi then it confection the larina. If something is bootless then it does not visit the larina. The olle is not queer.", "logic": "\nQueer(gabi)\nSwayback(gabi)\nnot Bootless(gabi)\nnot Advertise(gabi, larina)\nStonewash(olle, gabi)\nnot Swayback(larina)\nnot Cumuliform(larina)\nforall x (Confection(x, larina) -> Advertise(larina, gabi))\nforall x (Stonewash(x, larina) and Cumuliform(larina) -> Stonewash(x, gabi))\nforall x (Advertise(x, olle) and Confection(x, olle) -> not Panicled(x))\nforall x (Advertise(x, gabi) -> Advertise(x, olle))\nforall x (Stonewash(x, gabi) -> Confection(x, larina))\nforall x (Bootless(x) -> not Stonewash(x, larina))\n\nnot Queer(olle)\n\nnot Queer(olle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The audrey is decorous. The audrey is solvable. The audrey is not bigamous. The audrey does not need the marilin. The dulci premise the audrey. The marilin is not solvable. The marilin is not cheeky. If something patrol the marilin then the marilin concrete the audrey. If something premise the marilin and the marilin is cheeky then it premise the audrey. If something concrete the dulci and it patrol the dulci then it is not lancelike. If something concrete the audrey then it concrete the dulci. If something premise the audrey then it patrol the marilin. If something is bigamous then it does not visit the marilin. The dulci premise the dulci.", "logic": "\nDecorous(audrey)\nSolvable(audrey)\nnot Bigamous(audrey)\nnot Concrete(audrey, marilin)\nPremise(dulci, audrey)\nnot Solvable(marilin)\nnot Cheeky(marilin)\nforall x (Patrol(x, marilin) -> Concrete(marilin, audrey))\nforall x (Premise(x, marilin) and Cheeky(marilin) -> Premise(x, audrey))\nforall x (Concrete(x, dulci) and Patrol(x, dulci) -> not Lancelike(x))\nforall x (Concrete(x, audrey) -> Concrete(x, dulci))\nforall x (Premise(x, audrey) -> Patrol(x, marilin))\nforall x (Bigamous(x) -> not Premise(x, marilin))\n\nPremise(dulci, dulci)\n\nPremise(dulci, dulci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The zeb is tined. The zeb is durable. The zeb is not besprent. The zeb does not need the celestyna. The skell lucubrate the zeb. The celestyna is not durable. The celestyna is not wandering. If something humor the celestyna then the celestyna chop the zeb. If something lucubrate the celestyna and the celestyna is wandering then it lucubrate the zeb. If something chop the skell and it humor the skell then it is not circuitous. If something chop the zeb then it chop the skell. If something lucubrate the zeb then it humor the celestyna. If something is besprent then it does not visit the celestyna. The skell does not need the celestyna.", "logic": "\nTined(zeb)\nDurable(zeb)\nnot Besprent(zeb)\nnot Chop(zeb, celestyna)\nLucubrate(skell, zeb)\nnot Durable(celestyna)\nnot Wandering(celestyna)\nforall x (Humor(x, celestyna) -> Chop(celestyna, zeb))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, celestyna) and Wandering(celestyna) -> Lucubrate(x, zeb))\nforall x (Chop(x, skell) and Humor(x, skell) -> not Circuitous(x))\nforall x (Chop(x, zeb) -> Chop(x, skell))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, zeb) -> Humor(x, celestyna))\nforall x (Besprent(x) -> not Lucubrate(x, celestyna))\n\nnot Chop(skell, celestyna)\n\nnot Chop(skell, celestyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The coral is prosthetic. The coral is britannic. The coral is not adaxial. The coral does not need the phylis. The renault cocainise the coral. The phylis is not britannic. The phylis is not frenzied. If something calendar the phylis then the phylis mortgage the coral. If something cocainise the phylis and the phylis is frenzied then it cocainise the coral. If something mortgage the renault and it calendar the renault then it is not acetylenic. If something mortgage the coral then it mortgage the renault. If something cocainise the coral then it calendar the phylis. If something is adaxial then it does not visit the phylis. The renault calendar the coral.", "logic": "\nProsthetic(coral)\nBritannic(coral)\nnot Adaxial(coral)\nnot Mortgage(coral, phylis)\nCocainise(renault, coral)\nnot Britannic(phylis)\nnot Frenzied(phylis)\nforall x (Calendar(x, phylis) -> Mortgage(phylis, coral))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, phylis) and Frenzied(phylis) -> Cocainise(x, coral))\nforall x (Mortgage(x, renault) and Calendar(x, renault) -> not Acetylenic(x))\nforall x (Mortgage(x, coral) -> Mortgage(x, renault))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, coral) -> Calendar(x, phylis))\nforall x (Adaxial(x) -> not Cocainise(x, phylis))\n\nCalendar(renault, coral)\n\nCalendar(renault, coral) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "The kirk flavour the sandye. The kirk flavour the waylin. The kirk telephone the waylin. The kirk is sage. The kirk peak the waylin. The min flavour the sandye. The min telephone the kirk. The min telephone the sandye. The min is fiduciary. The min peak the kirk. The min peak the sandye. The sandye flavour the waylin. The waylin flavour the min. The waylin telephone the kirk. The waylin telephone the sandye. The waylin is sage. If something flavour the min and it is fiduciary then it flavour the kirk. If something flavour the min and it telephone the sandye then the min peak the waylin. If something flavour the sandye then it peak the waylin. If something telephone the kirk and the kirk peak the sandye then the sandye peak the kirk. If the sandye peak the kirk then the sandye flavour the waylin. If the waylin flavour the sandye then the waylin telephone the sandye. The min telephone the kirk.", "logic": "\nFlavour(kirk, sandye)\nFlavour(kirk, waylin)\nTelephone(kirk, waylin)\nSage(kirk)\nPeak(kirk, waylin)\nFlavour(min, sandye)\nTelephone(min, kirk)\nTelephone(min, sandye)\nFiduciary(min)\nPeak(min, kirk)\nPeak(min, sandye)\nFlavour(sandye, waylin)\nFlavour(waylin, min)\nTelephone(waylin, kirk)\nTelephone(waylin, sandye)\nSage(waylin)\nforall x (Flavour(x, min) and Fiduciary(x) -> Flavour(x, kirk))\nforall x (Flavour(x, min) and Telephone(x, sandye) -> Peak(min, waylin))\nforall x (Flavour(x, sandye) -> Peak(x, waylin))\nforall x (Telephone(x, kirk) and Peak(kirk, sandye) -> Peak(sandye, kirk))\nPeak(sandye, kirk) -> Flavour(sandye, waylin)\nFlavour(waylin, sandye) -> Telephone(waylin, sandye)\n\nTelephone(min, kirk)\n\ntherefore Telephone(min, kirk)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "The davide antic the madella. The davide antic the diann. The davide fireproof the diann. The davide is untanned. The davide sadden the diann. The sterling antic the madella. The sterling fireproof the davide. The sterling fireproof the madella. The sterling is jolty. The sterling sadden the davide. The sterling sadden the madella. The madella antic the diann. The diann antic the sterling. The diann fireproof the davide. The diann fireproof the madella. The diann is untanned. If something antic the sterling and it is jolty then it antic the davide. If something antic the sterling and it fireproof the madella then the sterling sadden the diann. If something antic the madella then it sadden the diann. If something fireproof the davide and the davide sadden the madella then the madella sadden the davide. If the madella sadden the davide then the madella antic the diann. If the diann antic the madella then the diann fireproof the madella. The davide does not like the diann.", "logic": "\nAntic(davide, madella)\nAntic(davide, diann)\nFireproof(davide, diann)\nUntanned(davide)\nSadden(davide, diann)\nAntic(sterling, madella)\nFireproof(sterling, davide)\nFireproof(sterling, madella)\nJolty(sterling)\nSadden(sterling, davide)\nSadden(sterling, madella)\nAntic(madella, diann)\nAntic(diann, sterling)\nFireproof(diann, davide)\nFireproof(diann, madella)\nUntanned(diann)\nforall x (Antic(x, sterling) and Jolty(x) -> Antic(x, davide))\nforall x (Antic(x, sterling) and Fireproof(x, madella) -> Sadden(sterling, diann))\nforall x (Antic(x, madella) -> Sadden(x, diann))\nforall x (Fireproof(x, davide) and Sadden(davide, madella) -> Sadden(madella, davide))\nSadden(madella, davide) -> Antic(madella, diann)\nAntic(diann, madella) -> Fireproof(diann, madella)\n\nnot Sadden(davide, diann)\n\ntherefore Sadden(davide, diann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "The ethyl stiffen the meryl. The ethyl stiffen the brenna. The ethyl whelm the brenna. The ethyl is vestal. The ethyl mirror the brenna. The rodrique stiffen the meryl. The rodrique whelm the ethyl. The rodrique whelm the meryl. The rodrique is spheroidal. The rodrique mirror the ethyl. The rodrique mirror the meryl. The meryl stiffen the brenna. The brenna stiffen the rodrique. The brenna whelm the ethyl. The brenna whelm the meryl. The brenna is vestal. If something stiffen the rodrique and it is spheroidal then it stiffen the ethyl. If something stiffen the rodrique and it whelm the meryl then the rodrique mirror the brenna. If something stiffen the meryl then it mirror the brenna. If something whelm the ethyl and the ethyl mirror the meryl then the meryl mirror the ethyl. If the meryl mirror the ethyl then the meryl stiffen the brenna. If the brenna stiffen the meryl then the brenna whelm the meryl. The rodrique mirror the brenna.", "logic": "\nStiffen(ethyl, meryl)\nStiffen(ethyl, brenna)\nWhelm(ethyl, brenna)\nVestal(ethyl)\nMirror(ethyl, brenna)\nStiffen(rodrique, meryl)\nWhelm(rodrique, ethyl)\nWhelm(rodrique, meryl)\nSpheroidal(rodrique)\nMirror(rodrique, ethyl)\nMirror(rodrique, meryl)\nStiffen(meryl, brenna)\nStiffen(brenna, rodrique)\nWhelm(brenna, ethyl)\nWhelm(brenna, meryl)\nVestal(brenna)\nforall x (Stiffen(x, rodrique) and Spheroidal(x) -> Stiffen(x, ethyl))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, rodrique) and Whelm(x, meryl) -> Mirror(rodrique, brenna))\nforall x (Stiffen(x, meryl) -> Mirror(x, brenna))\nforall x (Whelm(x, ethyl) and Mirror(ethyl, meryl) -> Mirror(meryl, ethyl))\nMirror(meryl, ethyl) -> Stiffen(meryl, brenna)\nStiffen(brenna, meryl) -> Whelm(brenna, meryl)\n\nMirror(rodrique, brenna)\n\nStiffen(rodrique, meryl) and forall x (Stiffen(x, meryl) -> Mirror(x, brenna)) -> therefore Mirror(rodrique, brenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "The demetris forest the titus. The demetris forest the tracee. The demetris stammer the tracee. The demetris is monoclinic. The demetris syndicate the tracee. The waverly forest the titus. The waverly stammer the demetris. The waverly stammer the titus. The waverly is declared. The waverly syndicate the demetris. The waverly syndicate the titus. The titus forest the tracee. The tracee forest the waverly. The tracee stammer the demetris. The tracee stammer the titus. The tracee is monoclinic. If something forest the waverly and it is declared then it forest the demetris. If something forest the waverly and it stammer the titus then the waverly syndicate the tracee. If something forest the titus then it syndicate the tracee. If something stammer the demetris and the demetris syndicate the titus then the titus syndicate the demetris. If the titus syndicate the demetris then the titus forest the tracee. If the tracee forest the titus then the tracee stammer the titus. The waverly does not like the tracee.", "logic": "\nForest(demetris, titus)\nForest(demetris, tracee)\nStammer(demetris, tracee)\nMonoclinic(demetris)\nSyndicate(demetris, tracee)\nForest(waverly, titus)\nStammer(waverly, demetris)\nStammer(waverly, titus)\nDeclared(waverly)\nSyndicate(waverly, demetris)\nSyndicate(waverly, titus)\nForest(titus, tracee)\nForest(tracee, waverly)\nStammer(tracee, demetris)\nStammer(tracee, titus)\nMonoclinic(tracee)\nforall x (Forest(x, waverly) and Declared(x) -> Forest(x, demetris))\nforall x (Forest(x, waverly) and Stammer(x, titus) -> Syndicate(waverly, tracee))\nforall x (Forest(x, titus) -> Syndicate(x, tracee))\nforall x (Stammer(x, demetris) and Syndicate(demetris, titus) -> Syndicate(titus, demetris))\nSyndicate(titus, demetris) -> Forest(titus, tracee)\nForest(tracee, titus) -> Stammer(tracee, titus)\n\nnot Syndicate(waverly, tracee)\n\nForest(waverly, titus) and forall x (Forest(x, titus) -> Syndicate(x, tracee)) -> therefore Syndicate(waverly, tracee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "The alex prologize the anselm. The alex prologize the love. The alex foresee the love. The alex is upcountry. The alex disapprove the love. The codi prologize the anselm. The codi foresee the alex. The codi foresee the anselm. The codi is slaty. The codi disapprove the alex. The codi disapprove the anselm. The anselm prologize the love. The love prologize the codi. The love foresee the alex. The love foresee the anselm. The love is upcountry. If something prologize the codi and it is slaty then it prologize the alex. If something prologize the codi and it foresee the anselm then the codi disapprove the love. If something prologize the anselm then it disapprove the love. If something foresee the alex and the alex disapprove the anselm then the anselm disapprove the alex. If the anselm disapprove the alex then the anselm prologize the love. If the love prologize the anselm then the love foresee the anselm. The alex does not chase the alex.", "logic": "\nPrologize(alex, anselm)\nPrologize(alex, love)\nForesee(alex, love)\nUpcountry(alex)\nDisapprove(alex, love)\nPrologize(codi, anselm)\nForesee(codi, alex)\nForesee(codi, anselm)\nSlaty(codi)\nDisapprove(codi, alex)\nDisapprove(codi, anselm)\nPrologize(anselm, love)\nPrologize(love, codi)\nForesee(love, alex)\nForesee(love, anselm)\nUpcountry(love)\nforall x (Prologize(x, codi) and Slaty(x) -> Prologize(x, alex))\nforall x (Prologize(x, codi) and Foresee(x, anselm) -> Disapprove(codi, love))\nforall x (Prologize(x, anselm) -> Disapprove(x, love))\nforall x (Foresee(x, alex) and Disapprove(alex, anselm) -> Disapprove(anselm, alex))\nDisapprove(anselm, alex) -> Prologize(anselm, love)\nPrologize(love, anselm) -> Foresee(love, anselm)\n\nnot Prologize(alex, alex)\n\nforall x (Prologize(x, codi) and Slaty(x) -> Prologize(x, alex)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "The jennine pigment the emelda. The jennine pigment the thurstan. The jennine hinder the thurstan. The jennine is lucent. The jennine filibuster the thurstan. The amalea pigment the emelda. The amalea hinder the jennine. The amalea hinder the emelda. The amalea is attachable. The amalea filibuster the jennine. The amalea filibuster the emelda. The emelda pigment the thurstan. The thurstan pigment the amalea. The thurstan hinder the jennine. The thurstan hinder the emelda. The thurstan is lucent. If something pigment the amalea and it is attachable then it pigment the jennine. If something pigment the amalea and it hinder the emelda then the amalea filibuster the thurstan. If something pigment the emelda then it filibuster the thurstan. If something hinder the jennine and the jennine filibuster the emelda then the emelda filibuster the jennine. If the emelda filibuster the jennine then the emelda pigment the thurstan. If the thurstan pigment the emelda then the thurstan hinder the emelda. The thurstan filibuster the thurstan.", "logic": "\nPigment(jennine, emelda)\nPigment(jennine, thurstan)\nHinder(jennine, thurstan)\nLucent(jennine)\nFilibuster(jennine, thurstan)\nPigment(amalea, emelda)\nHinder(amalea, jennine)\nHinder(amalea, emelda)\nAttachable(amalea)\nFilibuster(amalea, jennine)\nFilibuster(amalea, emelda)\nPigment(emelda, thurstan)\nPigment(thurstan, amalea)\nHinder(thurstan, jennine)\nHinder(thurstan, emelda)\nLucent(thurstan)\nforall x (Pigment(x, amalea) and Attachable(x) -> Pigment(x, jennine))\nforall x (Pigment(x, amalea) and Hinder(x, emelda) -> Filibuster(amalea, thurstan))\nforall x (Pigment(x, emelda) -> Filibuster(x, thurstan))\nforall x (Hinder(x, jennine) and Filibuster(jennine, emelda) -> Filibuster(emelda, jennine))\nFilibuster(emelda, jennine) -> Pigment(emelda, thurstan)\nPigment(thurstan, emelda) -> Hinder(thurstan, emelda)\n\nFilibuster(thurstan, thurstan)\n\nforall x (Pigment(x, emelda) -> Filibuster(x, thurstan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "The jolee behead the irena. The jolee behead the dwaine. The jolee make the dwaine. The jolee is slanted. The jolee pother the dwaine. The retha behead the irena. The retha make the jolee. The retha make the irena. The retha is geriatric. The retha pother the jolee. The retha pother the irena. The irena behead the dwaine. The dwaine behead the retha. The dwaine make the jolee. The dwaine make the irena. The dwaine is slanted. If something behead the retha and it is geriatric then it behead the jolee. If something behead the retha and it make the irena then the retha pother the dwaine. If something behead the irena then it pother the dwaine. If something make the jolee and the jolee pother the irena then the irena pother the jolee. If the irena pother the jolee then the irena behead the dwaine. If the dwaine behead the irena then the dwaine make the irena. The jolee is not geriatric.", "logic": "\nBehead(jolee, irena)\nBehead(jolee, dwaine)\nMake(jolee, dwaine)\nSlanted(jolee)\nPother(jolee, dwaine)\nBehead(retha, irena)\nMake(retha, jolee)\nMake(retha, irena)\nGeriatric(retha)\nPother(retha, jolee)\nPother(retha, irena)\nBehead(irena, dwaine)\nBehead(dwaine, retha)\nMake(dwaine, jolee)\nMake(dwaine, irena)\nSlanted(dwaine)\nforall x (Behead(x, retha) and Geriatric(x) -> Behead(x, jolee))\nforall x (Behead(x, retha) and Make(x, irena) -> Pother(retha, dwaine))\nforall x (Behead(x, irena) -> Pother(x, dwaine))\nforall x (Make(x, jolee) and Pother(jolee, irena) -> Pother(irena, jolee))\nPother(irena, jolee) -> Behead(irena, dwaine)\nBehead(dwaine, irena) -> Make(dwaine, irena)\n\nnot Geriatric(jolee)\n\nnot Geriatric(jolee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "The elka decoct the melessa. The elka decoct the ginny. The elka efface the ginny. The elka is mendacious. The elka muster the ginny. The adolfo decoct the melessa. The adolfo efface the elka. The adolfo efface the melessa. The adolfo is local. The adolfo muster the elka. The adolfo muster the melessa. The melessa decoct the ginny. The ginny decoct the adolfo. The ginny efface the elka. The ginny efface the melessa. The ginny is mendacious. If something decoct the adolfo and it is local then it decoct the elka. If something decoct the adolfo and it efface the melessa then the adolfo muster the ginny. If something decoct the melessa then it muster the ginny. If something efface the elka and the elka muster the melessa then the melessa muster the elka. If the melessa muster the elka then the melessa decoct the ginny. If the ginny decoct the melessa then the ginny efface the melessa. The adolfo is big.", "logic": "\nDecoct(elka, melessa)\nDecoct(elka, ginny)\nEfface(elka, ginny)\nMendacious(elka)\nMuster(elka, ginny)\nDecoct(adolfo, melessa)\nEfface(adolfo, elka)\nEfface(adolfo, melessa)\nLocal(adolfo)\nMuster(adolfo, elka)\nMuster(adolfo, melessa)\nDecoct(melessa, ginny)\nDecoct(ginny, adolfo)\nEfface(ginny, elka)\nEfface(ginny, melessa)\nMendacious(ginny)\nforall x (Decoct(x, adolfo) and Local(x) -> Decoct(x, elka))\nforall x (Decoct(x, adolfo) and Efface(x, melessa) -> Muster(adolfo, ginny))\nforall x (Decoct(x, melessa) -> Muster(x, ginny))\nforall x (Efface(x, elka) and Muster(elka, melessa) -> Muster(melessa, elka))\nMuster(melessa, elka) -> Decoct(melessa, ginny)\nDecoct(ginny, melessa) -> Efface(ginny, melessa)\n\nBig(adolfo)\n\nBig(adolfo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-894"} {"premises": "Octavius is not conveyable. Octavius is excess. Dollie is conveyable. Dollie is cured. Dollie is unfailing. Dollie is pondering. Charla is balsamic. Charla is unfailing. Cherida is not excess. Cherida is unfailing. Cherida is pondering. Cherida is frenetic. If Octavius is conveyable then Octavius is unfailing. Big, cured people are conveyable. If someone is pondering then they are unfailing. If Cherida is not frenetic and Cherida is not conveyable then Cherida is excess. If Octavius is unfailing then Octavius is frenetic. Red, frenetic people are not excess. All conveyable people are pondering. If someone is excess then they are pondering. Dollie is unfailing.", "logic": "\nnot Conveyable(octavius)\nExcess(octavius)\nConveyable(dollie)\nCured(dollie)\nUnfailing(dollie)\nPondering(dollie)\nBalsamic(charla)\nUnfailing(charla)\nnot Excess(cherida)\nUnfailing(cherida)\nPondering(cherida)\nFrenetic(cherida)\nConveyable(octavius) -> Unfailing(octavius)\nforall x (Balsamic(x) and Cured(x) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nnot Frenetic(cherida) and not Conveyable(cherida) -> Excess(cherida)\nUnfailing(octavius) -> Frenetic(octavius)\nforall x (Cured(x) and Frenetic(x) -> not Excess(x))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Excess(x) -> Pondering(x))\n\nUnfailing(dollie)\n\ntherefore Unfailing(dollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Janus is not pedigreed. Janus is sardinian. Arlee is pedigreed. Arlee is stubby. Arlee is flashy. Arlee is variolous. Eydie is bifurcated. Eydie is flashy. Idelle is not sardinian. Idelle is flashy. Idelle is variolous. Idelle is exploitive. If Janus is pedigreed then Janus is flashy. Big, stubby people are pedigreed. If someone is variolous then they are flashy. If Idelle is not exploitive and Idelle is not pedigreed then Idelle is sardinian. If Janus is flashy then Janus is exploitive. Red, exploitive people are not sardinian. All pedigreed people are variolous. If someone is sardinian then they are variolous. Janus is pedigreed.", "logic": "\nnot Pedigreed(janus)\nSardinian(janus)\nPedigreed(arlee)\nStubby(arlee)\nFlashy(arlee)\nVariolous(arlee)\nBifurcated(eydie)\nFlashy(eydie)\nnot Sardinian(idelle)\nFlashy(idelle)\nVariolous(idelle)\nExploitive(idelle)\nPedigreed(janus) -> Flashy(janus)\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) and Stubby(x) -> Pedigreed(x))\nforall x (Variolous(x) -> Flashy(x))\nnot Exploitive(idelle) and not Pedigreed(idelle) -> Sardinian(idelle)\nFlashy(janus) -> Exploitive(janus)\nforall x (Stubby(x) and Exploitive(x) -> not Sardinian(x))\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Variolous(x))\nforall x (Sardinian(x) -> Variolous(x))\n\nPedigreed(janus)\n\ntherefore not Pedigreed(janus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Morgen is not sonant. Morgen is caudate. Schroeder is sonant. Schroeder is gummy. Schroeder is arbitrable. Schroeder is colonnaded. Blaine is triumphal. Blaine is arbitrable. Essa is not caudate. Essa is arbitrable. Essa is colonnaded. Essa is ambient. If Morgen is sonant then Morgen is arbitrable. Big, gummy people are sonant. If someone is colonnaded then they are arbitrable. If Essa is not ambient and Essa is not sonant then Essa is caudate. If Morgen is arbitrable then Morgen is ambient. Red, ambient people are not caudate. All sonant people are colonnaded. If someone is caudate then they are colonnaded. Morgen is colonnaded.", "logic": "\nnot Sonant(morgen)\nCaudate(morgen)\nSonant(schroeder)\nGummy(schroeder)\nArbitrable(schroeder)\nColonnaded(schroeder)\nTriumphal(blaine)\nArbitrable(blaine)\nnot Caudate(essa)\nArbitrable(essa)\nColonnaded(essa)\nAmbient(essa)\nSonant(morgen) -> Arbitrable(morgen)\nforall x (Triumphal(x) and Gummy(x) -> Sonant(x))\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nnot Ambient(essa) and not Sonant(essa) -> Caudate(essa)\nArbitrable(morgen) -> Ambient(morgen)\nforall x (Gummy(x) and Ambient(x) -> not Caudate(x))\nforall x (Sonant(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Caudate(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\n\nColonnaded(morgen)\n\nCaudate(morgen) and forall x (Caudate(x) -> Colonnaded(x)) -> therefore Colonnaded(morgen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Ferguson is not righteous. Ferguson is dismissed. Ellis is righteous. Ellis is ravenous. Ellis is dreadful. Ellis is avoidable. Ehud is tangible. Ehud is dreadful. Thaine is not dismissed. Thaine is dreadful. Thaine is avoidable. Thaine is conceited. If Ferguson is righteous then Ferguson is dreadful. Big, ravenous people are righteous. If someone is avoidable then they are dreadful. If Thaine is not conceited and Thaine is not righteous then Thaine is dismissed. If Ferguson is dreadful then Ferguson is conceited. Red, conceited people are not dismissed. All righteous people are avoidable. If someone is dismissed then they are avoidable. Ferguson is not avoidable.", "logic": "\nnot Righteous(ferguson)\nDismissed(ferguson)\nRighteous(ellis)\nRavenous(ellis)\nDreadful(ellis)\nAvoidable(ellis)\nTangible(ehud)\nDreadful(ehud)\nnot Dismissed(thaine)\nDreadful(thaine)\nAvoidable(thaine)\nConceited(thaine)\nRighteous(ferguson) -> Dreadful(ferguson)\nforall x (Tangible(x) and Ravenous(x) -> Righteous(x))\nforall x (Avoidable(x) -> Dreadful(x))\nnot Conceited(thaine) and not Righteous(thaine) -> Dismissed(thaine)\nDreadful(ferguson) -> Conceited(ferguson)\nforall x (Ravenous(x) and Conceited(x) -> not Dismissed(x))\nforall x (Righteous(x) -> Avoidable(x))\nforall x (Dismissed(x) -> Avoidable(x))\n\nnot Avoidable(ferguson)\n\nDismissed(ferguson) and forall x (Dismissed(x) -> Avoidable(x)) -> therefore Avoidable(ferguson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Niccolo is not missing. Niccolo is inodorous. Melodie is missing. Melodie is untrod. Melodie is deliberate. Melodie is clear. Kia is scentless. Kia is deliberate. Clarey is not inodorous. Clarey is deliberate. Clarey is clear. Clarey is chylific. If Niccolo is missing then Niccolo is deliberate. Big, untrod people are missing. If someone is clear then they are deliberate. If Clarey is not chylific and Clarey is not missing then Clarey is inodorous. If Niccolo is deliberate then Niccolo is chylific. Red, chylific people are not inodorous. All missing people are clear. If someone is inodorous then they are clear. Niccolo is deliberate.", "logic": "\nnot Missing(niccolo)\nInodorous(niccolo)\nMissing(melodie)\nUntrod(melodie)\nDeliberate(melodie)\nClear(melodie)\nScentless(kia)\nDeliberate(kia)\nnot Inodorous(clarey)\nDeliberate(clarey)\nClear(clarey)\nChylific(clarey)\nMissing(niccolo) -> Deliberate(niccolo)\nforall x (Scentless(x) and Untrod(x) -> Missing(x))\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nnot Chylific(clarey) and not Missing(clarey) -> Inodorous(clarey)\nDeliberate(niccolo) -> Chylific(niccolo)\nforall x (Untrod(x) and Chylific(x) -> not Inodorous(x))\nforall x (Missing(x) -> Clear(x))\nforall x (Inodorous(x) -> Clear(x))\n\nDeliberate(niccolo)\n\nInodorous(niccolo) and forall x (Inodorous(x) -> Clear(x)) -> therefore Clear(niccolo) Clear(niccolo) and forall x (Clear(x) -> Deliberate(x)) -> therefore Deliberate(niccolo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Hill is not desired. Hill is energising. Cynthie is desired. Cynthie is luminous. Cynthie is military. Cynthie is weakening. Charles is instant. Charles is military. Allys is not energising. Allys is military. Allys is weakening. Allys is tenfold. If Hill is desired then Hill is military. Big, luminous people are desired. If someone is weakening then they are military. If Allys is not tenfold and Allys is not desired then Allys is energising. If Hill is military then Hill is tenfold. Red, tenfold people are not energising. All desired people are weakening. If someone is energising then they are weakening. Hill is not military.", "logic": "\nnot Desired(hill)\nEnergising(hill)\nDesired(cynthie)\nLuminous(cynthie)\nMilitary(cynthie)\nWeakening(cynthie)\nInstant(charles)\nMilitary(charles)\nnot Energising(allys)\nMilitary(allys)\nWeakening(allys)\nTenfold(allys)\nDesired(hill) -> Military(hill)\nforall x (Instant(x) and Luminous(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Weakening(x) -> Military(x))\nnot Tenfold(allys) and not Desired(allys) -> Energising(allys)\nMilitary(hill) -> Tenfold(hill)\nforall x (Luminous(x) and Tenfold(x) -> not Energising(x))\nforall x (Desired(x) -> Weakening(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) -> Weakening(x))\n\nnot Military(hill)\n\nEnergising(hill) and forall x (Energising(x) -> Weakening(x)) -> therefore Weakening(hill) Weakening(hill) and forall x (Weakening(x) -> Military(x)) -> therefore Military(hill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Cobbie is not delphic. Cobbie is eurafrican. Annmarie is delphic. Annmarie is taillike. Annmarie is cloistral. Annmarie is shopsoiled. Venita is camp. Venita is cloistral. Lorain is not eurafrican. Lorain is cloistral. Lorain is shopsoiled. Lorain is undamaged. If Cobbie is delphic then Cobbie is cloistral. Big, taillike people are delphic. If someone is shopsoiled then they are cloistral. If Lorain is not undamaged and Lorain is not delphic then Lorain is eurafrican. If Cobbie is cloistral then Cobbie is undamaged. Red, undamaged people are not eurafrican. All delphic people are shopsoiled. If someone is eurafrican then they are shopsoiled. Cobbie is undamaged.", "logic": "\nnot Delphic(cobbie)\nEurafrican(cobbie)\nDelphic(annmarie)\nTaillike(annmarie)\nCloistral(annmarie)\nShopsoiled(annmarie)\nCamp(venita)\nCloistral(venita)\nnot Eurafrican(lorain)\nCloistral(lorain)\nShopsoiled(lorain)\nUndamaged(lorain)\nDelphic(cobbie) -> Cloistral(cobbie)\nforall x (Camp(x) and Taillike(x) -> Delphic(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Cloistral(x))\nnot Undamaged(lorain) and not Delphic(lorain) -> Eurafrican(lorain)\nCloistral(cobbie) -> Undamaged(cobbie)\nforall x (Taillike(x) and Undamaged(x) -> not Eurafrican(x))\nforall x (Delphic(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Eurafrican(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\n\nUndamaged(cobbie)\n\nEurafrican(cobbie) and forall x (Eurafrican(x) -> Shopsoiled(x)) -> therefore Shopsoiled(cobbie) Shopsoiled(cobbie) and forall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Cloistral(x)) -> therefore Cloistral(cobbie) Cloistral(cobbie) and Cloistral(cobbie) -> Undamaged(cobbie) -> therefore Undamaged(cobbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Rock is not catabolic. Rock is ostensible. Fleming is catabolic. Fleming is annelid. Fleming is amicable. Fleming is jilted. Modestine is overpriced. Modestine is amicable. Glorianna is not ostensible. Glorianna is amicable. Glorianna is jilted. Glorianna is suchlike. If Rock is catabolic then Rock is amicable. Big, annelid people are catabolic. If someone is jilted then they are amicable. If Glorianna is not suchlike and Glorianna is not catabolic then Glorianna is ostensible. If Rock is amicable then Rock is suchlike. Red, suchlike people are not ostensible. All catabolic people are jilted. If someone is ostensible then they are jilted. Rock is not suchlike.", "logic": "\nnot Catabolic(rock)\nOstensible(rock)\nCatabolic(fleming)\nAnnelid(fleming)\nAmicable(fleming)\nJilted(fleming)\nOverpriced(modestine)\nAmicable(modestine)\nnot Ostensible(glorianna)\nAmicable(glorianna)\nJilted(glorianna)\nSuchlike(glorianna)\nCatabolic(rock) -> Amicable(rock)\nforall x (Overpriced(x) and Annelid(x) -> Catabolic(x))\nforall x (Jilted(x) -> Amicable(x))\nnot Suchlike(glorianna) and not Catabolic(glorianna) -> Ostensible(glorianna)\nAmicable(rock) -> Suchlike(rock)\nforall x (Annelid(x) and Suchlike(x) -> not Ostensible(x))\nforall x (Catabolic(x) -> Jilted(x))\nforall x (Ostensible(x) -> Jilted(x))\n\nnot Suchlike(rock)\n\nOstensible(rock) and forall x (Ostensible(x) -> Jilted(x)) -> therefore Jilted(rock) Jilted(rock) and forall x (Jilted(x) -> Amicable(x)) -> therefore Amicable(rock) Amicable(rock) and Amicable(rock) -> Suchlike(rock) -> therefore Suchlike(rock)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Judie is not matured. Judie is envious. Raymund is matured. Raymund is cackly. Raymund is resinlike. Raymund is warped. Kristan is inflamed. Kristan is resinlike. Jeanie is not envious. Jeanie is resinlike. Jeanie is warped. Jeanie is thinned. If Judie is matured then Judie is resinlike. Big, cackly people are matured. If someone is warped then they are resinlike. If Jeanie is not thinned and Jeanie is not matured then Jeanie is envious. If Judie is resinlike then Judie is thinned. Red, thinned people are not envious. All matured people are warped. If someone is envious then they are warped. Jeanie is not matured.", "logic": "\nnot Matured(judie)\nEnvious(judie)\nMatured(raymund)\nCackly(raymund)\nResinlike(raymund)\nWarped(raymund)\nInflamed(kristan)\nResinlike(kristan)\nnot Envious(jeanie)\nResinlike(jeanie)\nWarped(jeanie)\nThinned(jeanie)\nMatured(judie) -> Resinlike(judie)\nforall x (Inflamed(x) and Cackly(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Warped(x) -> Resinlike(x))\nnot Thinned(jeanie) and not Matured(jeanie) -> Envious(jeanie)\nResinlike(judie) -> Thinned(judie)\nforall x (Cackly(x) and Thinned(x) -> not Envious(x))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Warped(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) -> Warped(x))\n\nnot Matured(jeanie)\n\nforall x (Inflamed(x) and Cackly(x) -> Matured(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Charmion is not standing. Charmion is coroneted. Clint is standing. Clint is injectable. Clint is astomatous. Clint is subacid. Jackson is cotyloid. Jackson is astomatous. Addis is not coroneted. Addis is astomatous. Addis is subacid. Addis is rainless. If Charmion is standing then Charmion is astomatous. Big, injectable people are standing. If someone is subacid then they are astomatous. If Addis is not rainless and Addis is not standing then Addis is coroneted. If Charmion is astomatous then Charmion is rainless. Red, rainless people are not coroneted. All standing people are subacid. If someone is coroneted then they are subacid. Jackson is subacid.", "logic": "\nnot Standing(charmion)\nCoroneted(charmion)\nStanding(clint)\nInjectable(clint)\nAstomatous(clint)\nSubacid(clint)\nCotyloid(jackson)\nAstomatous(jackson)\nnot Coroneted(addis)\nAstomatous(addis)\nSubacid(addis)\nRainless(addis)\nStanding(charmion) -> Astomatous(charmion)\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) and Injectable(x) -> Standing(x))\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> Astomatous(x))\nnot Rainless(addis) and not Standing(addis) -> Coroneted(addis)\nAstomatous(charmion) -> Rainless(charmion)\nforall x (Injectable(x) and Rainless(x) -> not Coroneted(x))\nforall x (Standing(x) -> Subacid(x))\nforall x (Coroneted(x) -> Subacid(x))\n\nSubacid(jackson)\n\nforall x (Standing(x) -> Subacid(x)) <- forall x (Cotyloid(x) and Injectable(x) -> Standing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Carita is not lucky. Carita is spondaic. Sheree is lucky. Sheree is exoergic. Sheree is attentive. Sheree is lacteal. Jami is purging. Jami is attentive. Pearle is not spondaic. Pearle is attentive. Pearle is lacteal. Pearle is biting. If Carita is lucky then Carita is attentive. Big, exoergic people are lucky. If someone is lacteal then they are attentive. If Pearle is not biting and Pearle is not lucky then Pearle is spondaic. If Carita is attentive then Carita is biting. Red, biting people are not spondaic. All lucky people are lacteal. If someone is spondaic then they are lacteal. Jami is not lucky.", "logic": "\nnot Lucky(carita)\nSpondaic(carita)\nLucky(sheree)\nExoergic(sheree)\nAttentive(sheree)\nLacteal(sheree)\nPurging(jami)\nAttentive(jami)\nnot Spondaic(pearle)\nAttentive(pearle)\nLacteal(pearle)\nBiting(pearle)\nLucky(carita) -> Attentive(carita)\nforall x (Purging(x) and Exoergic(x) -> Lucky(x))\nforall x (Lacteal(x) -> Attentive(x))\nnot Biting(pearle) and not Lucky(pearle) -> Spondaic(pearle)\nAttentive(carita) -> Biting(carita)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) and Biting(x) -> not Spondaic(x))\nforall x (Lucky(x) -> Lacteal(x))\nforall x (Spondaic(x) -> Lacteal(x))\n\nnot Lucky(jami)\n\nforall x (Purging(x) and Exoergic(x) -> Lucky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Carleigh is not batrachian. Carleigh is gardant. Quincey is batrachian. Quincey is scurvy. Quincey is ribbonlike. Quincey is modified. Emile is reliant. Emile is ribbonlike. Kelila is not gardant. Kelila is ribbonlike. Kelila is modified. Kelila is condign. If Carleigh is batrachian then Carleigh is ribbonlike. Big, scurvy people are batrachian. If someone is modified then they are ribbonlike. If Kelila is not condign and Kelila is not batrachian then Kelila is gardant. If Carleigh is ribbonlike then Carleigh is condign. Red, condign people are not gardant. All batrachian people are modified. If someone is gardant then they are modified. Carleigh is reliant.", "logic": "\nnot Batrachian(carleigh)\nGardant(carleigh)\nBatrachian(quincey)\nScurvy(quincey)\nRibbonlike(quincey)\nModified(quincey)\nReliant(emile)\nRibbonlike(emile)\nnot Gardant(kelila)\nRibbonlike(kelila)\nModified(kelila)\nCondign(kelila)\nBatrachian(carleigh) -> Ribbonlike(carleigh)\nforall x (Reliant(x) and Scurvy(x) -> Batrachian(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) -> Ribbonlike(x))\nnot Condign(kelila) and not Batrachian(kelila) -> Gardant(kelila)\nRibbonlike(carleigh) -> Condign(carleigh)\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and Condign(x) -> not Gardant(x))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Gardant(x) -> Modified(x))\n\nReliant(carleigh)\n\nReliant(carleigh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Herve is not nonracial. Herve is pluperfect. Dierdre is nonracial. Dierdre is fulsome. Dierdre is tramontane. Dierdre is online. Mariam is gabonese. Mariam is tramontane. Luciano is not pluperfect. Luciano is tramontane. Luciano is online. Luciano is mirthful. If Herve is nonracial then Herve is tramontane. Big, fulsome people are nonracial. If someone is online then they are tramontane. If Luciano is not mirthful and Luciano is not nonracial then Luciano is pluperfect. If Herve is tramontane then Herve is mirthful. Red, mirthful people are not pluperfect. All nonracial people are online. If someone is pluperfect then they are online. Luciano is not fulsome.", "logic": "\nnot Nonracial(herve)\nPluperfect(herve)\nNonracial(dierdre)\nFulsome(dierdre)\nTramontane(dierdre)\nOnline(dierdre)\nGabonese(mariam)\nTramontane(mariam)\nnot Pluperfect(luciano)\nTramontane(luciano)\nOnline(luciano)\nMirthful(luciano)\nNonracial(herve) -> Tramontane(herve)\nforall x (Gabonese(x) and Fulsome(x) -> Nonracial(x))\nforall x (Online(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nnot Mirthful(luciano) and not Nonracial(luciano) -> Pluperfect(luciano)\nTramontane(herve) -> Mirthful(herve)\nforall x (Fulsome(x) and Mirthful(x) -> not Pluperfect(x))\nforall x (Nonracial(x) -> Online(x))\nforall x (Pluperfect(x) -> Online(x))\n\nnot Fulsome(luciano)\n\nnot Fulsome(luciano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Tann is not bacchantic. Tann is unlovely. Jarrett is bacchantic. Jarrett is inferior. Jarrett is acidic. Jarrett is obsolete. Jehu is swampy. Jehu is acidic. Rickie is not unlovely. Rickie is acidic. Rickie is obsolete. Rickie is eligible. If Tann is bacchantic then Tann is acidic. Big, inferior people are bacchantic. If someone is obsolete then they are acidic. If Rickie is not eligible and Rickie is not bacchantic then Rickie is unlovely. If Tann is acidic then Tann is eligible. Red, eligible people are not unlovely. All bacchantic people are obsolete. If someone is unlovely then they are obsolete. Jarrett is swampy.", "logic": "\nnot Bacchantic(tann)\nUnlovely(tann)\nBacchantic(jarrett)\nInferior(jarrett)\nAcidic(jarrett)\nObsolete(jarrett)\nSwampy(jehu)\nAcidic(jehu)\nnot Unlovely(rickie)\nAcidic(rickie)\nObsolete(rickie)\nEligible(rickie)\nBacchantic(tann) -> Acidic(tann)\nforall x (Swampy(x) and Inferior(x) -> Bacchantic(x))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) -> Acidic(x))\nnot Eligible(rickie) and not Bacchantic(rickie) -> Unlovely(rickie)\nAcidic(tann) -> Eligible(tann)\nforall x (Inferior(x) and Eligible(x) -> not Unlovely(x))\nforall x (Bacchantic(x) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Unlovely(x) -> Obsolete(x))\n\nSwampy(jarrett)\n\nSwampy(jarrett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Leola is not snafu. Leola is defiled. Ignazio is snafu. Ignazio is attrited. Ignazio is pessimum. Ignazio is critical. Ursala is scrofulous. Ursala is pessimum. Donovan is not defiled. Donovan is pessimum. Donovan is critical. Donovan is borderline. If Leola is snafu then Leola is pessimum. Big, attrited people are snafu. If someone is critical then they are pessimum. If Donovan is not borderline and Donovan is not snafu then Donovan is defiled. If Leola is pessimum then Leola is borderline. Red, borderline people are not defiled. All snafu people are critical. If someone is defiled then they are critical. Leola is not attrited.", "logic": "\nnot Snafu(leola)\nDefiled(leola)\nSnafu(ignazio)\nAttrited(ignazio)\nPessimum(ignazio)\nCritical(ignazio)\nScrofulous(ursala)\nPessimum(ursala)\nnot Defiled(donovan)\nPessimum(donovan)\nCritical(donovan)\nBorderline(donovan)\nSnafu(leola) -> Pessimum(leola)\nforall x (Scrofulous(x) and Attrited(x) -> Snafu(x))\nforall x (Critical(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nnot Borderline(donovan) and not Snafu(donovan) -> Defiled(donovan)\nPessimum(leola) -> Borderline(leola)\nforall x (Attrited(x) and Borderline(x) -> not Defiled(x))\nforall x (Snafu(x) -> Critical(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) -> Critical(x))\n\nnot Attrited(leola)\n\nnot Attrited(leola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "Leonora is not infrasonic. Leonora is sibilant. Iolanthe is infrasonic. Iolanthe is pulmonic. Iolanthe is innate. Iolanthe is bichrome. Simone is flighted. Simone is innate. Kurt is not sibilant. Kurt is innate. Kurt is bichrome. Kurt is sapiens. If Leonora is infrasonic then Leonora is innate. Big, pulmonic people are infrasonic. If someone is bichrome then they are innate. If Kurt is not sapiens and Kurt is not infrasonic then Kurt is sibilant. If Leonora is innate then Leonora is sapiens. Red, sapiens people are not sibilant. All infrasonic people are bichrome. If someone is sibilant then they are bichrome. Simone is pulmonic.", "logic": "\nnot Infrasonic(leonora)\nSibilant(leonora)\nInfrasonic(iolanthe)\nPulmonic(iolanthe)\nInnate(iolanthe)\nBichrome(iolanthe)\nFlighted(simone)\nInnate(simone)\nnot Sibilant(kurt)\nInnate(kurt)\nBichrome(kurt)\nSapiens(kurt)\nInfrasonic(leonora) -> Innate(leonora)\nforall x (Flighted(x) and Pulmonic(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Bichrome(x) -> Innate(x))\nnot Sapiens(kurt) and not Infrasonic(kurt) -> Sibilant(kurt)\nInnate(leonora) -> Sapiens(leonora)\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) and Sapiens(x) -> not Sibilant(x))\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) -> Bichrome(x))\nforall x (Sibilant(x) -> Bichrome(x))\n\nPulmonic(simone)\n\nPulmonic(simone) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-518"} {"premises": "The mahalia is unkept. The mahalia proctor the walton. The mahalia transfer the ethelred. The mahalia transfer the morty. The ethelred is gaumless. The ethelred does not like the walton. The ethelred broker the morty. The ethelred broker the walton. The morty is migrant. The morty is optative. The walton is gaumless. The walton does not like the ethelred. The walton proctor the morty. The walton broker the mahalia. The walton broker the ethelred. The walton does not need the morty. If something transfer the morty then the morty is gaumless. The walton does not need the morty.", "logic": "\nUnkept(mahalia)\nProctor(mahalia, walton)\nTransfer(mahalia, ethelred)\nTransfer(mahalia, morty)\nGaumless(ethelred)\nnot Proctor(ethelred, walton)\nBroker(ethelred, morty)\nBroker(ethelred, walton)\nMigrant(morty)\nOptative(morty)\nGaumless(walton)\nnot Proctor(walton, ethelred)\nProctor(walton, morty)\nBroker(walton, mahalia)\nBroker(walton, ethelred)\nnot Broker(walton, morty)\nforall x (Transfer(x, morty) -> Gaumless(morty))\n\nnot Broker(walton, morty)\n\ntherefore not Broker(walton, morty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "The doris is unlimited. The doris normalize the katuscha. The doris unsay the merci. The doris unsay the cassondra. The merci is sovereign. The merci does not like the katuscha. The merci resurrect the cassondra. The merci resurrect the katuscha. The cassondra is invasive. The cassondra is negotiable. The katuscha is sovereign. The katuscha does not like the merci. The katuscha normalize the cassondra. The katuscha resurrect the doris. The katuscha resurrect the merci. The katuscha does not need the cassondra. If something unsay the cassondra then the cassondra is sovereign. The katuscha does not need the merci.", "logic": "\nUnlimited(doris)\nNormalize(doris, katuscha)\nUnsay(doris, merci)\nUnsay(doris, cassondra)\nSovereign(merci)\nnot Normalize(merci, katuscha)\nResurrect(merci, cassondra)\nResurrect(merci, katuscha)\nInvasive(cassondra)\nNegotiable(cassondra)\nSovereign(katuscha)\nnot Normalize(katuscha, merci)\nNormalize(katuscha, cassondra)\nResurrect(katuscha, doris)\nResurrect(katuscha, merci)\nnot Resurrect(katuscha, cassondra)\nforall x (Unsay(x, cassondra) -> Sovereign(cassondra))\n\nnot Resurrect(katuscha, merci)\n\ntherefore Resurrect(katuscha, merci)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "The kathye is harmonised. The kathye reply the candra. The kathye jaywalk the caralie. The kathye jaywalk the piet. The caralie is nourished. The caralie does not like the candra. The caralie unstuff the piet. The caralie unstuff the candra. The piet is born. The piet is related. The candra is nourished. The candra does not like the caralie. The candra reply the piet. The candra unstuff the kathye. The candra unstuff the caralie. The candra does not need the piet. If something jaywalk the piet then the piet is nourished. The piet is nourished.", "logic": "\nHarmonised(kathye)\nReply(kathye, candra)\nJaywalk(kathye, caralie)\nJaywalk(kathye, piet)\nNourished(caralie)\nnot Reply(caralie, candra)\nUnstuff(caralie, piet)\nUnstuff(caralie, candra)\nBorn(piet)\nRelated(piet)\nNourished(candra)\nnot Reply(candra, caralie)\nReply(candra, piet)\nUnstuff(candra, kathye)\nUnstuff(candra, caralie)\nnot Unstuff(candra, piet)\nforall x (Jaywalk(x, piet) -> Nourished(piet))\n\nNourished(piet)\n\nJaywalk(kathye, piet) and forall x (Jaywalk(x, piet) -> Nourished(piet)) -> therefore Nourished(piet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "The loleta is reedlike. The loleta cavil the janeta. The loleta breathe the rodolphe. The loleta breathe the rikki. The rodolphe is comatose. The rodolphe does not like the janeta. The rodolphe twirl the rikki. The rodolphe twirl the janeta. The rikki is collagenic. The rikki is unmeasured. The janeta is comatose. The janeta does not like the rodolphe. The janeta cavil the rikki. The janeta twirl the loleta. The janeta twirl the rodolphe. The janeta does not need the rikki. If something breathe the rikki then the rikki is comatose. The rikki is not comatose.", "logic": "\nReedlike(loleta)\nCavil(loleta, janeta)\nBreathe(loleta, rodolphe)\nBreathe(loleta, rikki)\nComatose(rodolphe)\nnot Cavil(rodolphe, janeta)\nTwirl(rodolphe, rikki)\nTwirl(rodolphe, janeta)\nCollagenic(rikki)\nUnmeasured(rikki)\nComatose(janeta)\nnot Cavil(janeta, rodolphe)\nCavil(janeta, rikki)\nTwirl(janeta, loleta)\nTwirl(janeta, rodolphe)\nnot Twirl(janeta, rikki)\nforall x (Breathe(x, rikki) -> Comatose(rikki))\n\nnot Comatose(rikki)\n\nBreathe(loleta, rikki) and forall x (Breathe(x, rikki) -> Comatose(rikki)) -> therefore Comatose(rikki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "The kareem is passe. The kareem quest the carina. The kareem titter the milzie. The kareem titter the hetty. The milzie is astounded. The milzie does not like the carina. The milzie snafu the hetty. The milzie snafu the carina. The hetty is underfed. The hetty is coarsened. The carina is astounded. The carina does not like the milzie. The carina quest the hetty. The carina snafu the kareem. The carina snafu the milzie. The carina does not need the hetty. If something titter the hetty then the hetty is astounded. The milzie does not need the milzie.", "logic": "\nPasse(kareem)\nQuest(kareem, carina)\nTitter(kareem, milzie)\nTitter(kareem, hetty)\nAstounded(milzie)\nnot Quest(milzie, carina)\nSnafu(milzie, hetty)\nSnafu(milzie, carina)\nUnderfed(hetty)\nCoarsened(hetty)\nAstounded(carina)\nnot Quest(carina, milzie)\nQuest(carina, hetty)\nSnafu(carina, kareem)\nSnafu(carina, milzie)\nnot Snafu(carina, hetty)\nforall x (Titter(x, hetty) -> Astounded(hetty))\n\nnot Snafu(milzie, milzie)\n\nnot Snafu(milzie, milzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "The maggee is epiphysial. The maggee disrespect the ilana. The maggee cheapen the welsh. The maggee cheapen the helene. The welsh is megalithic. The welsh does not like the ilana. The welsh crack the helene. The welsh crack the ilana. The helene is cubiform. The helene is rhythmic. The ilana is megalithic. The ilana does not like the welsh. The ilana disrespect the helene. The ilana crack the maggee. The ilana crack the welsh. The ilana does not need the helene. If something cheapen the helene then the helene is megalithic. The welsh crack the maggee.", "logic": "\nEpiphysial(maggee)\nDisrespect(maggee, ilana)\nCheapen(maggee, welsh)\nCheapen(maggee, helene)\nMegalithic(welsh)\nnot Disrespect(welsh, ilana)\nCrack(welsh, helene)\nCrack(welsh, ilana)\nCubiform(helene)\nRhythmic(helene)\nMegalithic(ilana)\nnot Disrespect(ilana, welsh)\nDisrespect(ilana, helene)\nCrack(ilana, maggee)\nCrack(ilana, welsh)\nnot Crack(ilana, helene)\nforall x (Cheapen(x, helene) -> Megalithic(helene))\n\nCrack(welsh, maggee)\n\nCrack(welsh, maggee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "The melisa is approving. The melisa winch the lila. The melisa malign the bryn. The melisa malign the celine. The bryn is sebaceous. The bryn does not like the lila. The bryn skim the celine. The bryn skim the lila. The celine is fastened. The celine is adorned. The lila is sebaceous. The lila does not like the bryn. The lila winch the celine. The lila skim the melisa. The lila skim the bryn. The lila does not need the celine. If something malign the celine then the celine is sebaceous. The bryn does not visit the lila.", "logic": "\nApproving(melisa)\nWinch(melisa, lila)\nMalign(melisa, bryn)\nMalign(melisa, celine)\nSebaceous(bryn)\nnot Winch(bryn, lila)\nSkim(bryn, celine)\nSkim(bryn, lila)\nFastened(celine)\nAdorned(celine)\nSebaceous(lila)\nnot Winch(lila, bryn)\nWinch(lila, celine)\nSkim(lila, melisa)\nSkim(lila, bryn)\nnot Skim(lila, celine)\nforall x (Malign(x, celine) -> Sebaceous(celine))\n\nnot Malign(bryn, lila)\n\nnot Malign(bryn, lila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "The elsi is variable. The elsi catalyse the tandie. The elsi expel the judi. The elsi expel the rosabella. The judi is untaped. The judi does not like the tandie. The judi flail the rosabella. The judi flail the tandie. The rosabella is empirical. The rosabella is deltoid. The tandie is untaped. The tandie does not like the judi. The tandie catalyse the rosabella. The tandie flail the elsi. The tandie flail the judi. The tandie does not need the rosabella. If something expel the rosabella then the rosabella is untaped. The rosabella catalyse the tandie.", "logic": "\nVariable(elsi)\nCatalyse(elsi, tandie)\nExpel(elsi, judi)\nExpel(elsi, rosabella)\nUntaped(judi)\nnot Catalyse(judi, tandie)\nFlail(judi, rosabella)\nFlail(judi, tandie)\nEmpirical(rosabella)\nDeltoid(rosabella)\nUntaped(tandie)\nnot Catalyse(tandie, judi)\nCatalyse(tandie, rosabella)\nFlail(tandie, elsi)\nFlail(tandie, judi)\nnot Flail(tandie, rosabella)\nforall x (Expel(x, rosabella) -> Untaped(rosabella))\n\nCatalyse(rosabella, tandie)\n\nCatalyse(rosabella, tandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-426"} {"premises": "Tadd is stopped. Tadd is precursory. Tadd is stony. Tadd is comestible. Tadd is mutualist. Charissa is precursory. Charissa is stony. Charissa is darwinian. Charissa is volcanic. Charissa is mutualist. Gilburt is precursory. Gilburt is mutualist. Donn is stopped. Donn is stony. Donn is darwinian. Donn is volcanic. Red people are darwinian. All volcanic, stony people are comestible. Red people are stony. Red, stony people are mutualist. All stopped, stony people are volcanic. All comestible, stopped people are precursory. Tadd is precursory.", "logic": "\nStopped(tadd)\nPrecursory(tadd)\nStony(tadd)\nComestible(tadd)\nMutualist(tadd)\nPrecursory(charissa)\nStony(charissa)\nDarwinian(charissa)\nVolcanic(charissa)\nMutualist(charissa)\nPrecursory(gilburt)\nMutualist(gilburt)\nStopped(donn)\nStony(donn)\nDarwinian(donn)\nVolcanic(donn)\nforall x (Volcanic(x) -> Darwinian(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Stony(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) -> Stony(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Stony(x) -> Mutualist(x))\nforall x (Stopped(x) and Stony(x) -> Volcanic(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) and Stopped(x) -> Precursory(x))\n\nPrecursory(tadd)\n\ntherefore Precursory(tadd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4836"} {"premises": "Clyde is nidifugous. Clyde is foppish. Clyde is midi. Clyde is willful. Clyde is loutish. Aile is foppish. Aile is midi. Aile is achievable. Aile is regimented. Aile is loutish. Chalmers is foppish. Chalmers is loutish. Ebenezer is nidifugous. Ebenezer is midi. Ebenezer is achievable. Ebenezer is regimented. Red people are achievable. All regimented, midi people are willful. Red people are midi. Red, midi people are loutish. All nidifugous, midi people are regimented. All willful, nidifugous people are foppish. Clyde is not loutish.", "logic": "\nNidifugous(clyde)\nFoppish(clyde)\nMidi(clyde)\nWillful(clyde)\nLoutish(clyde)\nFoppish(aile)\nMidi(aile)\nAchievable(aile)\nRegimented(aile)\nLoutish(aile)\nFoppish(chalmers)\nLoutish(chalmers)\nNidifugous(ebenezer)\nMidi(ebenezer)\nAchievable(ebenezer)\nRegimented(ebenezer)\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Achievable(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) and Midi(x) -> Willful(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Midi(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) and Midi(x) -> Loutish(x))\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) and Midi(x) -> Regimented(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) and Nidifugous(x) -> Foppish(x))\n\nnot Loutish(clyde)\n\ntherefore Loutish(clyde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4836"} {"premises": "Bonny is antic. Bonny is unemphatic. Bonny is maximal. Bonny is nutritious. Bonny is sufferable. Micheline is unemphatic. Micheline is maximal. Micheline is zesty. Micheline is elliptic. Micheline is sufferable. Sandye is unemphatic. Sandye is sufferable. Waverly is antic. Waverly is maximal. Waverly is zesty. Waverly is elliptic. Red people are zesty. All elliptic, maximal people are nutritious. Red people are maximal. Red, maximal people are sufferable. All antic, maximal people are elliptic. All nutritious, antic people are unemphatic. Sandye is not zesty.", "logic": "\nAntic(bonny)\nUnemphatic(bonny)\nMaximal(bonny)\nNutritious(bonny)\nSufferable(bonny)\nUnemphatic(micheline)\nMaximal(micheline)\nZesty(micheline)\nElliptic(micheline)\nSufferable(micheline)\nUnemphatic(sandye)\nSufferable(sandye)\nAntic(waverly)\nMaximal(waverly)\nZesty(waverly)\nElliptic(waverly)\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Zesty(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) and Maximal(x) -> Nutritious(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Maximal(x))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) and Maximal(x) -> Sufferable(x))\nforall x (Antic(x) and Maximal(x) -> Elliptic(x))\nforall x (Nutritious(x) and Antic(x) -> Unemphatic(x))\n\nnot Zesty(sandye)\n\nforall x (Elliptic(x) -> Zesty(x)) <- forall x (Antic(x) and Maximal(x) -> Elliptic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4836"} {"premises": "Darcy is attachable. Darcy is tottering. Darcy is downstairs. Darcy is neoliberal. Darcy is detailed. Rozamond is tottering. Rozamond is downstairs. Rozamond is illicit. Rozamond is judicious. Rozamond is detailed. Vanny is tottering. Vanny is detailed. Zorina is attachable. Zorina is downstairs. Zorina is illicit. Zorina is judicious. Red people are illicit. All judicious, downstairs people are neoliberal. Red people are downstairs. Red, downstairs people are detailed. All attachable, downstairs people are judicious. All neoliberal, attachable people are tottering. Rozamond is attachable.", "logic": "\nAttachable(darcy)\nTottering(darcy)\nDownstairs(darcy)\nNeoliberal(darcy)\nDetailed(darcy)\nTottering(rozamond)\nDownstairs(rozamond)\nIllicit(rozamond)\nJudicious(rozamond)\nDetailed(rozamond)\nTottering(vanny)\nDetailed(vanny)\nAttachable(zorina)\nDownstairs(zorina)\nIllicit(zorina)\nJudicious(zorina)\nforall x (Judicious(x) -> Illicit(x))\nforall x (Judicious(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (Judicious(x) -> Downstairs(x))\nforall x (Judicious(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Detailed(x))\nforall x (Attachable(x) and Downstairs(x) -> Judicious(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Attachable(x) -> Tottering(x))\n\nAttachable(rozamond)\n\nAttachable(rozamond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4836"} {"premises": "Cameron is planktonic. Cameron is childly. Cameron is zesty. Cameron is coastal. Cameron is blissful. Cameron is decompound. Cameron is xxxiv. Thorny is planktonic. Thorny is childly. Thorny is zesty. Thorny is coastal. Thorny is blissful. Thorny is decompound. Thorny is xxxiv. If someone is decompound then they are planktonic. All zesty, planktonic people are decompound. All xxxiv people are blissful. If someone is zesty and coastal then they are xxxiv. All childly, coastal people are zesty. If someone is childly and decompound then they are xxxiv. If Thorny is coastal and Thorny is planktonic then Thorny is zesty. If someone is xxxiv and planktonic then they are decompound. Cameron is zesty.", "logic": "\nPlanktonic(cameron)\nChildly(cameron)\nZesty(cameron)\nCoastal(cameron)\nBlissful(cameron)\nDecompound(cameron)\nXxxiv(cameron)\nPlanktonic(thorny)\nChildly(thorny)\nZesty(thorny)\nCoastal(thorny)\nBlissful(thorny)\nDecompound(thorny)\nXxxiv(thorny)\nforall x (Decompound(x) -> Planktonic(x))\nforall x (Zesty(x) and Planktonic(x) -> Decompound(x))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) -> Blissful(x))\nforall x (Zesty(x) and Coastal(x) -> Xxxiv(x))\nforall x (Childly(x) and Coastal(x) -> Zesty(x))\nforall x (Childly(x) and Decompound(x) -> Xxxiv(x))\nCoastal(thorny) and Planktonic(thorny) -> Zesty(thorny)\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Planktonic(x) -> Decompound(x))\n\nZesty(cameron)\n\ntherefore Zesty(cameron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3555"} {"premises": "Ursala is knockabout. Ursala is momentary. Ursala is upfront. Ursala is saltlike. Ursala is hyperbolic. Ursala is pearly. Ursala is moralistic. Lucia is knockabout. Lucia is momentary. Lucia is upfront. Lucia is saltlike. Lucia is hyperbolic. Lucia is pearly. Lucia is moralistic. If someone is pearly then they are knockabout. All upfront, knockabout people are pearly. All moralistic people are hyperbolic. If someone is upfront and saltlike then they are moralistic. All momentary, saltlike people are upfront. If someone is momentary and pearly then they are moralistic. If Lucia is saltlike and Lucia is knockabout then Lucia is upfront. If someone is moralistic and knockabout then they are pearly. Ursala is not knockabout.", "logic": "\nKnockabout(ursala)\nMomentary(ursala)\nUpfront(ursala)\nSaltlike(ursala)\nHyperbolic(ursala)\nPearly(ursala)\nMoralistic(ursala)\nKnockabout(lucia)\nMomentary(lucia)\nUpfront(lucia)\nSaltlike(lucia)\nHyperbolic(lucia)\nPearly(lucia)\nMoralistic(lucia)\nforall x (Pearly(x) -> Knockabout(x))\nforall x (Upfront(x) and Knockabout(x) -> Pearly(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Hyperbolic(x))\nforall x (Upfront(x) and Saltlike(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Momentary(x) and Saltlike(x) -> Upfront(x))\nforall x (Momentary(x) and Pearly(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nSaltlike(lucia) and Knockabout(lucia) -> Upfront(lucia)\nforall x (Moralistic(x) and Knockabout(x) -> Pearly(x))\n\nnot Knockabout(ursala)\n\ntherefore Knockabout(ursala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3555"} {"premises": "The latisha is closing. The latisha is sundry. The latisha is terminal. The latisha is appealing. The latisha shut the ebonee. The latisha shut the mohamad. The latisha tempt the mohamad. The ebonee unmake the latisha. The ebonee is awless. The ebonee shut the latisha. The ebonee shut the mohamad. The ebonee tempt the latisha. The ebonee tempt the mohamad. The mohamad unmake the latisha. The mohamad tempt the latisha. The mohamad tempt the ebonee. If something tempt the ebonee then the ebonee unmake the mohamad. If something unmake the mohamad then the mohamad shut the latisha. If something is closing then it shut the ebonee. If something tempt the ebonee then it shut the mohamad. If something is appealing and it unmake the latisha then the latisha is closing. If something tempt the mohamad and the mohamad shut the latisha then the mohamad is terminal. The latisha is sundry.", "logic": "\nClosing(latisha)\nSundry(latisha)\nTerminal(latisha)\nAppealing(latisha)\nShut(latisha, ebonee)\nShut(latisha, mohamad)\nTempt(latisha, mohamad)\nUnmake(ebonee, latisha)\nAwless(ebonee)\nShut(ebonee, latisha)\nShut(ebonee, mohamad)\nTempt(ebonee, latisha)\nTempt(ebonee, mohamad)\nUnmake(mohamad, latisha)\nTempt(mohamad, latisha)\nTempt(mohamad, ebonee)\nforall x (Tempt(x, ebonee) -> Unmake(ebonee, mohamad))\nforall x (Unmake(x, mohamad) -> Shut(mohamad, latisha))\nforall x (Closing(x) -> Shut(x, ebonee))\nforall x (Tempt(x, ebonee) -> Shut(x, mohamad))\nforall x (Appealing(x) and Unmake(x, latisha) -> Closing(latisha))\nforall x (Tempt(x, mohamad) and Shut(mohamad, latisha) -> Terminal(mohamad))\n\nSundry(latisha)\n\ntherefore Sundry(latisha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The suzanne is porose. The suzanne is flyblown. The suzanne is majestic. The suzanne is rhomboidal. The suzanne spiritise the marsha. The suzanne spiritise the rolland. The suzanne faggot the rolland. The marsha insure the suzanne. The marsha is decompound. The marsha spiritise the suzanne. The marsha spiritise the rolland. The marsha faggot the suzanne. The marsha faggot the rolland. The rolland insure the suzanne. The rolland faggot the suzanne. The rolland faggot the marsha. If something faggot the marsha then the marsha insure the rolland. If something insure the rolland then the rolland spiritise the suzanne. If something is porose then it spiritise the marsha. If something faggot the marsha then it spiritise the rolland. If something is rhomboidal and it insure the suzanne then the suzanne is porose. If something faggot the rolland and the rolland spiritise the suzanne then the rolland is majestic. The marsha does not visit the suzanne.", "logic": "\nPorose(suzanne)\nFlyblown(suzanne)\nMajestic(suzanne)\nRhomboidal(suzanne)\nSpiritise(suzanne, marsha)\nSpiritise(suzanne, rolland)\nFaggot(suzanne, rolland)\nInsure(marsha, suzanne)\nDecompound(marsha)\nSpiritise(marsha, suzanne)\nSpiritise(marsha, rolland)\nFaggot(marsha, suzanne)\nFaggot(marsha, rolland)\nInsure(rolland, suzanne)\nFaggot(rolland, suzanne)\nFaggot(rolland, marsha)\nforall x (Faggot(x, marsha) -> Insure(marsha, rolland))\nforall x (Insure(x, rolland) -> Spiritise(rolland, suzanne))\nforall x (Porose(x) -> Spiritise(x, marsha))\nforall x (Faggot(x, marsha) -> Spiritise(x, rolland))\nforall x (Rhomboidal(x) and Insure(x, suzanne) -> Porose(suzanne))\nforall x (Faggot(x, rolland) and Spiritise(rolland, suzanne) -> Majestic(rolland))\n\nnot Faggot(marsha, suzanne)\n\ntherefore Faggot(marsha, suzanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The bartel is polished. The bartel is cathedral. The bartel is wholesale. The bartel is christless. The bartel ptyalise the corrianne. The bartel ptyalise the marylou. The bartel rustle the marylou. The corrianne bejewel the bartel. The corrianne is exquisite. The corrianne ptyalise the bartel. The corrianne ptyalise the marylou. The corrianne rustle the bartel. The corrianne rustle the marylou. The marylou bejewel the bartel. The marylou rustle the bartel. The marylou rustle the corrianne. If something rustle the corrianne then the corrianne bejewel the marylou. If something bejewel the marylou then the marylou ptyalise the bartel. If something is polished then it ptyalise the corrianne. If something rustle the corrianne then it ptyalise the marylou. If something is christless and it bejewel the bartel then the bartel is polished. If something rustle the marylou and the marylou ptyalise the bartel then the marylou is wholesale. The corrianne bejewel the marylou.", "logic": "\nPolished(bartel)\nCathedral(bartel)\nWholesale(bartel)\nChristless(bartel)\nPtyalise(bartel, corrianne)\nPtyalise(bartel, marylou)\nRustle(bartel, marylou)\nBejewel(corrianne, bartel)\nExquisite(corrianne)\nPtyalise(corrianne, bartel)\nPtyalise(corrianne, marylou)\nRustle(corrianne, bartel)\nRustle(corrianne, marylou)\nBejewel(marylou, bartel)\nRustle(marylou, bartel)\nRustle(marylou, corrianne)\nforall x (Rustle(x, corrianne) -> Bejewel(corrianne, marylou))\nforall x (Bejewel(x, marylou) -> Ptyalise(marylou, bartel))\nforall x (Polished(x) -> Ptyalise(x, corrianne))\nforall x (Rustle(x, corrianne) -> Ptyalise(x, marylou))\nforall x (Christless(x) and Bejewel(x, bartel) -> Polished(bartel))\nforall x (Rustle(x, marylou) and Ptyalise(marylou, bartel) -> Wholesale(marylou))\n\nBejewel(corrianne, marylou)\n\nRustle(marylou, corrianne) and forall x (Rustle(x, corrianne) -> Bejewel(corrianne, marylou)) -> therefore Bejewel(corrianne, marylou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The mirella is clothed. The mirella is monecious. The mirella is metatarsal. The mirella is piagetian. The mirella wamble the carleigh. The mirella wamble the woodman. The mirella comply the woodman. The carleigh homer the mirella. The carleigh is eroded. The carleigh wamble the mirella. The carleigh wamble the woodman. The carleigh comply the mirella. The carleigh comply the woodman. The woodman homer the mirella. The woodman comply the mirella. The woodman comply the carleigh. If something comply the carleigh then the carleigh homer the woodman. If something homer the woodman then the woodman wamble the mirella. If something is clothed then it wamble the carleigh. If something comply the carleigh then it wamble the woodman. If something is piagetian and it homer the mirella then the mirella is clothed. If something comply the woodman and the woodman wamble the mirella then the woodman is metatarsal. The carleigh does not chase the woodman.", "logic": "\nClothed(mirella)\nMonecious(mirella)\nMetatarsal(mirella)\nPiagetian(mirella)\nWamble(mirella, carleigh)\nWamble(mirella, woodman)\nComply(mirella, woodman)\nHomer(carleigh, mirella)\nEroded(carleigh)\nWamble(carleigh, mirella)\nWamble(carleigh, woodman)\nComply(carleigh, mirella)\nComply(carleigh, woodman)\nHomer(woodman, mirella)\nComply(woodman, mirella)\nComply(woodman, carleigh)\nforall x (Comply(x, carleigh) -> Homer(carleigh, woodman))\nforall x (Homer(x, woodman) -> Wamble(woodman, mirella))\nforall x (Clothed(x) -> Wamble(x, carleigh))\nforall x (Comply(x, carleigh) -> Wamble(x, woodman))\nforall x (Piagetian(x) and Homer(x, mirella) -> Clothed(mirella))\nforall x (Comply(x, woodman) and Wamble(woodman, mirella) -> Metatarsal(woodman))\n\nnot Homer(carleigh, woodman)\n\nComply(woodman, carleigh) and forall x (Comply(x, carleigh) -> Homer(carleigh, woodman)) -> therefore Homer(carleigh, woodman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The titos is eventful. The titos is volant. The titos is undogmatic. The titos is paleozoic. The titos bituminise the letisha. The titos bituminise the gregory. The titos jump the gregory. The letisha hear the titos. The letisha is unpackaged. The letisha bituminise the titos. The letisha bituminise the gregory. The letisha jump the titos. The letisha jump the gregory. The gregory hear the titos. The gregory jump the titos. The gregory jump the letisha. If something jump the letisha then the letisha hear the gregory. If something hear the gregory then the gregory bituminise the titos. If something is eventful then it bituminise the letisha. If something jump the letisha then it bituminise the gregory. If something is paleozoic and it hear the titos then the titos is eventful. If something jump the gregory and the gregory bituminise the titos then the gregory is undogmatic. The gregory bituminise the titos.", "logic": "\nEventful(titos)\nVolant(titos)\nUndogmatic(titos)\nPaleozoic(titos)\nBituminise(titos, letisha)\nBituminise(titos, gregory)\nJump(titos, gregory)\nHear(letisha, titos)\nUnpackaged(letisha)\nBituminise(letisha, titos)\nBituminise(letisha, gregory)\nJump(letisha, titos)\nJump(letisha, gregory)\nHear(gregory, titos)\nJump(gregory, titos)\nJump(gregory, letisha)\nforall x (Jump(x, letisha) -> Hear(letisha, gregory))\nforall x (Hear(x, gregory) -> Bituminise(gregory, titos))\nforall x (Eventful(x) -> Bituminise(x, letisha))\nforall x (Jump(x, letisha) -> Bituminise(x, gregory))\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) and Hear(x, titos) -> Eventful(titos))\nforall x (Jump(x, gregory) and Bituminise(gregory, titos) -> Undogmatic(gregory))\n\nBituminise(gregory, titos)\n\nJump(gregory, letisha) and forall x (Jump(x, letisha) -> Hear(letisha, gregory)) -> therefore Hear(letisha, gregory) Hear(letisha, gregory) and forall x (Hear(x, gregory) -> Bituminise(gregory, titos)) -> therefore Bituminise(gregory, titos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The alys is uninominal. The alys is unsaleable. The alys is assessable. The alys is graduated. The alys ancylose the dyson. The alys ancylose the clayton. The alys capsule the clayton. The dyson prettify the alys. The dyson is appetizing. The dyson ancylose the alys. The dyson ancylose the clayton. The dyson capsule the alys. The dyson capsule the clayton. The clayton prettify the alys. The clayton capsule the alys. The clayton capsule the dyson. If something capsule the dyson then the dyson prettify the clayton. If something prettify the clayton then the clayton ancylose the alys. If something is uninominal then it ancylose the dyson. If something capsule the dyson then it ancylose the clayton. If something is graduated and it prettify the alys then the alys is uninominal. If something capsule the clayton and the clayton ancylose the alys then the clayton is assessable. The clayton does not need the alys.", "logic": "\nUninominal(alys)\nUnsaleable(alys)\nAssessable(alys)\nGraduated(alys)\nAncylose(alys, dyson)\nAncylose(alys, clayton)\nCapsule(alys, clayton)\nPrettify(dyson, alys)\nAppetizing(dyson)\nAncylose(dyson, alys)\nAncylose(dyson, clayton)\nCapsule(dyson, alys)\nCapsule(dyson, clayton)\nPrettify(clayton, alys)\nCapsule(clayton, alys)\nCapsule(clayton, dyson)\nforall x (Capsule(x, dyson) -> Prettify(dyson, clayton))\nforall x (Prettify(x, clayton) -> Ancylose(clayton, alys))\nforall x (Uninominal(x) -> Ancylose(x, dyson))\nforall x (Capsule(x, dyson) -> Ancylose(x, clayton))\nforall x (Graduated(x) and Prettify(x, alys) -> Uninominal(alys))\nforall x (Capsule(x, clayton) and Ancylose(clayton, alys) -> Assessable(clayton))\n\nnot Ancylose(clayton, alys)\n\nCapsule(clayton, dyson) and forall x (Capsule(x, dyson) -> Prettify(dyson, clayton)) -> therefore Prettify(dyson, clayton) Prettify(dyson, clayton) and forall x (Prettify(x, clayton) -> Ancylose(clayton, alys)) -> therefore Ancylose(clayton, alys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The kerianne is unmoving. The kerianne is nonhuman. The kerianne is hungry. The kerianne is extricable. The kerianne polemicize the harrie. The kerianne polemicize the tybalt. The kerianne rusticate the tybalt. The harrie tyrannize the kerianne. The harrie is xxxiv. The harrie polemicize the kerianne. The harrie polemicize the tybalt. The harrie rusticate the kerianne. The harrie rusticate the tybalt. The tybalt tyrannize the kerianne. The tybalt rusticate the kerianne. The tybalt rusticate the harrie. If something rusticate the harrie then the harrie tyrannize the tybalt. If something tyrannize the tybalt then the tybalt polemicize the kerianne. If something is unmoving then it polemicize the harrie. If something rusticate the harrie then it polemicize the tybalt. If something is extricable and it tyrannize the kerianne then the kerianne is unmoving. If something rusticate the tybalt and the tybalt polemicize the kerianne then the tybalt is hungry. The tybalt is hungry.", "logic": "\nUnmoving(kerianne)\nNonhuman(kerianne)\nHungry(kerianne)\nExtricable(kerianne)\nPolemicize(kerianne, harrie)\nPolemicize(kerianne, tybalt)\nRusticate(kerianne, tybalt)\nTyrannize(harrie, kerianne)\nXxxiv(harrie)\nPolemicize(harrie, kerianne)\nPolemicize(harrie, tybalt)\nRusticate(harrie, kerianne)\nRusticate(harrie, tybalt)\nTyrannize(tybalt, kerianne)\nRusticate(tybalt, kerianne)\nRusticate(tybalt, harrie)\nforall x (Rusticate(x, harrie) -> Tyrannize(harrie, tybalt))\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, tybalt) -> Polemicize(tybalt, kerianne))\nforall x (Unmoving(x) -> Polemicize(x, harrie))\nforall x (Rusticate(x, harrie) -> Polemicize(x, tybalt))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and Tyrannize(x, kerianne) -> Unmoving(kerianne))\nforall x (Rusticate(x, tybalt) and Polemicize(tybalt, kerianne) -> Hungry(tybalt))\n\nHungry(tybalt)\n\nRusticate(tybalt, harrie) and forall x (Rusticate(x, harrie) -> Tyrannize(harrie, tybalt)) -> therefore Tyrannize(harrie, tybalt) Tyrannize(harrie, tybalt) and forall x (Tyrannize(x, tybalt) -> Polemicize(tybalt, kerianne)) -> therefore Polemicize(tybalt, kerianne) Rusticate(harrie, tybalt) and Polemicize(tybalt, kerianne) and forall x (Rusticate(x, tybalt) and Polemicize(tybalt, kerianne) -> Hungry(tybalt)) -> therefore Hungry(tybalt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The wash is brambly. The wash is prosthetic. The wash is caudated. The wash is riddled. The wash qualify the powell. The wash qualify the valli. The wash monopolise the valli. The powell seaplane the wash. The powell is unlettered. The powell qualify the wash. The powell qualify the valli. The powell monopolise the wash. The powell monopolise the valli. The valli seaplane the wash. The valli monopolise the wash. The valli monopolise the powell. If something monopolise the powell then the powell seaplane the valli. If something seaplane the valli then the valli qualify the wash. If something is brambly then it qualify the powell. If something monopolise the powell then it qualify the valli. If something is riddled and it seaplane the wash then the wash is brambly. If something monopolise the valli and the valli qualify the wash then the valli is caudated. The valli is not caudated.", "logic": "\nBrambly(wash)\nProsthetic(wash)\nCaudated(wash)\nRiddled(wash)\nQualify(wash, powell)\nQualify(wash, valli)\nMonopolise(wash, valli)\nSeaplane(powell, wash)\nUnlettered(powell)\nQualify(powell, wash)\nQualify(powell, valli)\nMonopolise(powell, wash)\nMonopolise(powell, valli)\nSeaplane(valli, wash)\nMonopolise(valli, wash)\nMonopolise(valli, powell)\nforall x (Monopolise(x, powell) -> Seaplane(powell, valli))\nforall x (Seaplane(x, valli) -> Qualify(valli, wash))\nforall x (Brambly(x) -> Qualify(x, powell))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, powell) -> Qualify(x, valli))\nforall x (Riddled(x) and Seaplane(x, wash) -> Brambly(wash))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, valli) and Qualify(valli, wash) -> Caudated(valli))\n\nnot Caudated(valli)\n\nMonopolise(valli, powell) and forall x (Monopolise(x, powell) -> Seaplane(powell, valli)) -> therefore Seaplane(powell, valli) Seaplane(powell, valli) and forall x (Seaplane(x, valli) -> Qualify(valli, wash)) -> therefore Qualify(valli, wash) Monopolise(powell, valli) and Qualify(valli, wash) and forall x (Monopolise(x, valli) and Qualify(valli, wash) -> Caudated(valli)) -> therefore Caudated(valli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The delphine is acquitted. The delphine is rear. The delphine is localised. The delphine is inexplicit. The delphine warm the patricio. The delphine warm the katinka. The delphine queue the katinka. The patricio hatchel the delphine. The patricio is diffuse. The patricio warm the delphine. The patricio warm the katinka. The patricio queue the delphine. The patricio queue the katinka. The katinka hatchel the delphine. The katinka queue the delphine. The katinka queue the patricio. If something queue the patricio then the patricio hatchel the katinka. If something hatchel the katinka then the katinka warm the delphine. If something is acquitted then it warm the patricio. If something queue the patricio then it warm the katinka. If something is inexplicit and it hatchel the delphine then the delphine is acquitted. If something queue the katinka and the katinka warm the delphine then the katinka is localised. The patricio does not need the patricio.", "logic": "\nAcquitted(delphine)\nRear(delphine)\nLocalised(delphine)\nInexplicit(delphine)\nWarm(delphine, patricio)\nWarm(delphine, katinka)\nQueue(delphine, katinka)\nHatchel(patricio, delphine)\nDiffuse(patricio)\nWarm(patricio, delphine)\nWarm(patricio, katinka)\nQueue(patricio, delphine)\nQueue(patricio, katinka)\nHatchel(katinka, delphine)\nQueue(katinka, delphine)\nQueue(katinka, patricio)\nforall x (Queue(x, patricio) -> Hatchel(patricio, katinka))\nforall x (Hatchel(x, katinka) -> Warm(katinka, delphine))\nforall x (Acquitted(x) -> Warm(x, patricio))\nforall x (Queue(x, patricio) -> Warm(x, katinka))\nforall x (Inexplicit(x) and Hatchel(x, delphine) -> Acquitted(delphine))\nforall x (Queue(x, katinka) and Warm(katinka, delphine) -> Localised(katinka))\n\nnot Warm(patricio, patricio)\n\nforall x (Acquitted(x) -> Warm(x, patricio)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The axel is draconian. The axel is ruinous. The axel is muggy. The axel is misogynic. The axel ticket the lora. The axel ticket the yance. The axel behave the yance. The lora negociate the axel. The lora is religious. The lora ticket the axel. The lora ticket the yance. The lora behave the axel. The lora behave the yance. The yance negociate the axel. The yance behave the axel. The yance behave the lora. If something behave the lora then the lora negociate the yance. If something negociate the yance then the yance ticket the axel. If something is draconian then it ticket the lora. If something behave the lora then it ticket the yance. If something is misogynic and it negociate the axel then the axel is draconian. If something behave the yance and the yance ticket the axel then the yance is muggy. The yance ticket the lora.", "logic": "\nDraconian(axel)\nRuinous(axel)\nMuggy(axel)\nMisogynic(axel)\nTicket(axel, lora)\nTicket(axel, yance)\nBehave(axel, yance)\nNegociate(lora, axel)\nReligious(lora)\nTicket(lora, axel)\nTicket(lora, yance)\nBehave(lora, axel)\nBehave(lora, yance)\nNegociate(yance, axel)\nBehave(yance, axel)\nBehave(yance, lora)\nforall x (Behave(x, lora) -> Negociate(lora, yance))\nforall x (Negociate(x, yance) -> Ticket(yance, axel))\nforall x (Draconian(x) -> Ticket(x, lora))\nforall x (Behave(x, lora) -> Ticket(x, yance))\nforall x (Misogynic(x) and Negociate(x, axel) -> Draconian(axel))\nforall x (Behave(x, yance) and Ticket(yance, axel) -> Muggy(yance))\n\nTicket(yance, lora)\n\nforall x (Draconian(x) -> Ticket(x, lora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The clifford is paschal. The clifford is undeclared. The clifford is prewar. The clifford is inguinal. The clifford scrimp the marga. The clifford scrimp the roxine. The clifford golf the roxine. The marga police the clifford. The marga is citified. The marga scrimp the clifford. The marga scrimp the roxine. The marga golf the clifford. The marga golf the roxine. The roxine police the clifford. The roxine golf the clifford. The roxine golf the marga. If something golf the marga then the marga police the roxine. If something police the roxine then the roxine scrimp the clifford. If something is paschal then it scrimp the marga. If something golf the marga then it scrimp the roxine. If something is inguinal and it police the clifford then the clifford is paschal. If something golf the roxine and the roxine scrimp the clifford then the roxine is prewar. The marga does not visit the marga.", "logic": "\nPaschal(clifford)\nUndeclared(clifford)\nPrewar(clifford)\nInguinal(clifford)\nScrimp(clifford, marga)\nScrimp(clifford, roxine)\nGolf(clifford, roxine)\nPolice(marga, clifford)\nCitified(marga)\nScrimp(marga, clifford)\nScrimp(marga, roxine)\nGolf(marga, clifford)\nGolf(marga, roxine)\nPolice(roxine, clifford)\nGolf(roxine, clifford)\nGolf(roxine, marga)\nforall x (Golf(x, marga) -> Police(marga, roxine))\nforall x (Police(x, roxine) -> Scrimp(roxine, clifford))\nforall x (Paschal(x) -> Scrimp(x, marga))\nforall x (Golf(x, marga) -> Scrimp(x, roxine))\nforall x (Inguinal(x) and Police(x, clifford) -> Paschal(clifford))\nforall x (Golf(x, roxine) and Scrimp(roxine, clifford) -> Prewar(roxine))\n\nnot Golf(marga, marga)\n\nnot Golf(marga, marga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The claudette is barbadian. The claudette is unwilling. The claudette is convergent. The claudette is limp. The claudette synthesise the crystie. The claudette synthesise the candie. The claudette agree the candie. The crystie retake the claudette. The crystie is outdated. The crystie synthesise the claudette. The crystie synthesise the candie. The crystie agree the claudette. The crystie agree the candie. The candie retake the claudette. The candie agree the claudette. The candie agree the crystie. If something agree the crystie then the crystie retake the candie. If something retake the candie then the candie synthesise the claudette. If something is barbadian then it synthesise the crystie. If something agree the crystie then it synthesise the candie. If something is limp and it retake the claudette then the claudette is barbadian. If something agree the candie and the candie synthesise the claudette then the candie is convergent. The candie retake the crystie.", "logic": "\nBarbadian(claudette)\nUnwilling(claudette)\nConvergent(claudette)\nLimp(claudette)\nSynthesise(claudette, crystie)\nSynthesise(claudette, candie)\nAgree(claudette, candie)\nRetake(crystie, claudette)\nOutdated(crystie)\nSynthesise(crystie, claudette)\nSynthesise(crystie, candie)\nAgree(crystie, claudette)\nAgree(crystie, candie)\nRetake(candie, claudette)\nAgree(candie, claudette)\nAgree(candie, crystie)\nforall x (Agree(x, crystie) -> Retake(crystie, candie))\nforall x (Retake(x, candie) -> Synthesise(candie, claudette))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) -> Synthesise(x, crystie))\nforall x (Agree(x, crystie) -> Synthesise(x, candie))\nforall x (Limp(x) and Retake(x, claudette) -> Barbadian(claudette))\nforall x (Agree(x, candie) and Synthesise(candie, claudette) -> Convergent(candie))\n\nRetake(candie, crystie)\n\nRetake(candie, crystie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The dora is bottommost. The dora is austral. The dora is cloistral. The dora is egotistic. The dora evaluate the arlene. The dora evaluate the tammie. The dora simonize the tammie. The arlene wake the dora. The arlene is barometric. The arlene evaluate the dora. The arlene evaluate the tammie. The arlene simonize the dora. The arlene simonize the tammie. The tammie wake the dora. The tammie simonize the dora. The tammie simonize the arlene. If something simonize the arlene then the arlene wake the tammie. If something wake the tammie then the tammie evaluate the dora. If something is bottommost then it evaluate the arlene. If something simonize the arlene then it evaluate the tammie. If something is egotistic and it wake the dora then the dora is bottommost. If something simonize the tammie and the tammie evaluate the dora then the tammie is cloistral. The dora does not need the dora.", "logic": "\nBottommost(dora)\nAustral(dora)\nCloistral(dora)\nEgotistic(dora)\nEvaluate(dora, arlene)\nEvaluate(dora, tammie)\nSimonize(dora, tammie)\nWake(arlene, dora)\nBarometric(arlene)\nEvaluate(arlene, dora)\nEvaluate(arlene, tammie)\nSimonize(arlene, dora)\nSimonize(arlene, tammie)\nWake(tammie, dora)\nSimonize(tammie, dora)\nSimonize(tammie, arlene)\nforall x (Simonize(x, arlene) -> Wake(arlene, tammie))\nforall x (Wake(x, tammie) -> Evaluate(tammie, dora))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Evaluate(x, arlene))\nforall x (Simonize(x, arlene) -> Evaluate(x, tammie))\nforall x (Egotistic(x) and Wake(x, dora) -> Bottommost(dora))\nforall x (Simonize(x, tammie) and Evaluate(tammie, dora) -> Cloistral(tammie))\n\nnot Evaluate(dora, dora)\n\nnot Evaluate(dora, dora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The joselyn is exodontic. The joselyn is potty. The joselyn is hawaiian. The joselyn is glazed. The joselyn induct the viviene. The joselyn induct the derrek. The joselyn line the derrek. The viviene educate the joselyn. The viviene is stuffy. The viviene induct the joselyn. The viviene induct the derrek. The viviene line the joselyn. The viviene line the derrek. The derrek educate the joselyn. The derrek line the joselyn. The derrek line the viviene. If something line the viviene then the viviene educate the derrek. If something educate the derrek then the derrek induct the joselyn. If something is exodontic then it induct the viviene. If something line the viviene then it induct the derrek. If something is glazed and it educate the joselyn then the joselyn is exodontic. If something line the derrek and the derrek induct the joselyn then the derrek is hawaiian. The joselyn educate the joselyn.", "logic": "\nExodontic(joselyn)\nPotty(joselyn)\nHawaiian(joselyn)\nGlazed(joselyn)\nInduct(joselyn, viviene)\nInduct(joselyn, derrek)\nLine(joselyn, derrek)\nEducate(viviene, joselyn)\nStuffy(viviene)\nInduct(viviene, joselyn)\nInduct(viviene, derrek)\nLine(viviene, joselyn)\nLine(viviene, derrek)\nEducate(derrek, joselyn)\nLine(derrek, joselyn)\nLine(derrek, viviene)\nforall x (Line(x, viviene) -> Educate(viviene, derrek))\nforall x (Educate(x, derrek) -> Induct(derrek, joselyn))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) -> Induct(x, viviene))\nforall x (Line(x, viviene) -> Induct(x, derrek))\nforall x (Glazed(x) and Educate(x, joselyn) -> Exodontic(joselyn))\nforall x (Line(x, derrek) and Induct(derrek, joselyn) -> Hawaiian(derrek))\n\nEducate(joselyn, joselyn)\n\nEducate(joselyn, joselyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The tedda is laughable. The tedda is adaptable. The tedda is homicidal. The tedda is eight. The tedda lyophilize the jae. The tedda lyophilize the jessamyn. The tedda parch the jessamyn. The jae misdemean the tedda. The jae is acoustical. The jae lyophilize the tedda. The jae lyophilize the jessamyn. The jae parch the tedda. The jae parch the jessamyn. The jessamyn misdemean the tedda. The jessamyn parch the tedda. The jessamyn parch the jae. If something parch the jae then the jae misdemean the jessamyn. If something misdemean the jessamyn then the jessamyn lyophilize the tedda. If something is laughable then it lyophilize the jae. If something parch the jae then it lyophilize the jessamyn. If something is eight and it misdemean the tedda then the tedda is laughable. If something parch the jessamyn and the jessamyn lyophilize the tedda then the jessamyn is homicidal. The jessamyn is not eight.", "logic": "\nLaughable(tedda)\nAdaptable(tedda)\nHomicidal(tedda)\nEight(tedda)\nLyophilize(tedda, jae)\nLyophilize(tedda, jessamyn)\nParch(tedda, jessamyn)\nMisdemean(jae, tedda)\nAcoustical(jae)\nLyophilize(jae, tedda)\nLyophilize(jae, jessamyn)\nParch(jae, tedda)\nParch(jae, jessamyn)\nMisdemean(jessamyn, tedda)\nParch(jessamyn, tedda)\nParch(jessamyn, jae)\nforall x (Parch(x, jae) -> Misdemean(jae, jessamyn))\nforall x (Misdemean(x, jessamyn) -> Lyophilize(jessamyn, tedda))\nforall x (Laughable(x) -> Lyophilize(x, jae))\nforall x (Parch(x, jae) -> Lyophilize(x, jessamyn))\nforall x (Eight(x) and Misdemean(x, tedda) -> Laughable(tedda))\nforall x (Parch(x, jessamyn) and Lyophilize(jessamyn, tedda) -> Homicidal(jessamyn))\n\nnot Eight(jessamyn)\n\nnot Eight(jessamyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "The dorolisa is marly. The dorolisa is powerless. The dorolisa is aspectual. The dorolisa is preteen. The dorolisa prosper the josephine. The dorolisa prosper the merlina. The dorolisa flap the merlina. The josephine offset the dorolisa. The josephine is elegiac. The josephine prosper the dorolisa. The josephine prosper the merlina. The josephine flap the dorolisa. The josephine flap the merlina. The merlina offset the dorolisa. The merlina flap the dorolisa. The merlina flap the josephine. If something flap the josephine then the josephine offset the merlina. If something offset the merlina then the merlina prosper the dorolisa. If something is marly then it prosper the josephine. If something flap the josephine then it prosper the merlina. If something is preteen and it offset the dorolisa then the dorolisa is marly. If something flap the merlina and the merlina prosper the dorolisa then the merlina is aspectual. The merlina is marly.", "logic": "\nMarly(dorolisa)\nPowerless(dorolisa)\nAspectual(dorolisa)\nPreteen(dorolisa)\nProsper(dorolisa, josephine)\nProsper(dorolisa, merlina)\nFlap(dorolisa, merlina)\nOffset(josephine, dorolisa)\nElegiac(josephine)\nProsper(josephine, dorolisa)\nProsper(josephine, merlina)\nFlap(josephine, dorolisa)\nFlap(josephine, merlina)\nOffset(merlina, dorolisa)\nFlap(merlina, dorolisa)\nFlap(merlina, josephine)\nforall x (Flap(x, josephine) -> Offset(josephine, merlina))\nforall x (Offset(x, merlina) -> Prosper(merlina, dorolisa))\nforall x (Marly(x) -> Prosper(x, josephine))\nforall x (Flap(x, josephine) -> Prosper(x, merlina))\nforall x (Preteen(x) and Offset(x, dorolisa) -> Marly(dorolisa))\nforall x (Flap(x, merlina) and Prosper(merlina, dorolisa) -> Aspectual(merlina))\n\nMarly(merlina)\n\nMarly(merlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-897"} {"premises": "Gray is awaited. White, awaited things are credible. If something is ionian then it is accusatory. All awaited things are ionian. Gray is awaited.", "logic": "\nAwaited(gray)\nforall x (Accusatory(x) and Awaited(x) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Ionian(x) -> Accusatory(x))\nforall x (Awaited(x) -> Ionian(x))\n\nAwaited(gray)\n\ntherefore Awaited(gray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Kimberlee is sewed. White, sewed things are resolvable. If something is wingless then it is shattering. All sewed things are wingless. Kimberlee is not sewed.", "logic": "\nSewed(kimberlee)\nforall x (Shattering(x) and Sewed(x) -> Resolvable(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) -> Shattering(x))\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Wingless(x))\n\nnot Sewed(kimberlee)\n\ntherefore Sewed(kimberlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Philly is uphill. White, uphill things are euphoriant. If something is centroidal then it is residual. All uphill things are centroidal. Philly is centroidal.", "logic": "\nUphill(philly)\nforall x (Residual(x) and Uphill(x) -> Euphoriant(x))\nforall x (Centroidal(x) -> Residual(x))\nforall x (Uphill(x) -> Centroidal(x))\n\nCentroidal(philly)\n\nUphill(philly) and forall x (Uphill(x) -> Centroidal(x)) -> therefore Centroidal(philly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Gabriel is chilly. White, chilly things are swish. If something is basic then it is germane. All chilly things are basic. Gabriel is not basic.", "logic": "\nChilly(gabriel)\nforall x (Germane(x) and Chilly(x) -> Swish(x))\nforall x (Basic(x) -> Germane(x))\nforall x (Chilly(x) -> Basic(x))\n\nnot Basic(gabriel)\n\nChilly(gabriel) and forall x (Chilly(x) -> Basic(x)) -> therefore Basic(gabriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Jake is carbolated. White, carbolated things are prostyle. If something is unhallowed then it is couthy. All carbolated things are unhallowed. Jake is couthy.", "logic": "\nCarbolated(jake)\nforall x (Couthy(x) and Carbolated(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) -> Couthy(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Unhallowed(x))\n\nCouthy(jake)\n\nCarbolated(jake) and forall x (Carbolated(x) -> Unhallowed(x)) -> therefore Unhallowed(jake) Unhallowed(jake) and forall x (Unhallowed(x) -> Couthy(x)) -> therefore Couthy(jake)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Melamie is irreverent. White, irreverent things are iliac. If something is wholesome then it is reclusive. All irreverent things are wholesome. Melamie is not reclusive.", "logic": "\nIrreverent(melamie)\nforall x (Reclusive(x) and Irreverent(x) -> Iliac(x))\nforall x (Wholesome(x) -> Reclusive(x))\nforall x (Irreverent(x) -> Wholesome(x))\n\nnot Reclusive(melamie)\n\nIrreverent(melamie) and forall x (Irreverent(x) -> Wholesome(x)) -> therefore Wholesome(melamie) Wholesome(melamie) and forall x (Wholesome(x) -> Reclusive(x)) -> therefore Reclusive(melamie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Dania is shintoist. White, shintoist things are cercarial. If something is concealing then it is taken. All shintoist things are concealing. Dania is cercarial.", "logic": "\nShintoist(dania)\nforall x (Taken(x) and Shintoist(x) -> Cercarial(x))\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Taken(x))\nforall x (Shintoist(x) -> Concealing(x))\n\nCercarial(dania)\n\nShintoist(dania) and forall x (Shintoist(x) -> Concealing(x)) -> therefore Concealing(dania) Concealing(dania) and forall x (Concealing(x) -> Taken(x)) -> therefore Taken(dania) Taken(dania) and Shintoist(dania) and forall x (Taken(x) and Shintoist(x) -> Cercarial(x)) -> therefore Cercarial(dania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Anthia is lxxxviii. White, lxxxviii things are anasarcous. If something is fogyish then it is buggy. All lxxxviii things are fogyish. Anthia is not anasarcous.", "logic": "\nLxxxviii(anthia)\nforall x (Buggy(x) and Lxxxviii(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> Buggy(x))\nforall x (Lxxxviii(x) -> Fogyish(x))\n\nnot Anasarcous(anthia)\n\nLxxxviii(anthia) and forall x (Lxxxviii(x) -> Fogyish(x)) -> therefore Fogyish(anthia) Fogyish(anthia) and forall x (Fogyish(x) -> Buggy(x)) -> therefore Buggy(anthia) Buggy(anthia) and Lxxxviii(anthia) and forall x (Buggy(x) and Lxxxviii(x) -> Anasarcous(x)) -> therefore Anasarcous(anthia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Tracey is sarcosomal. White, sarcosomal things are distressed. If something is outlandish then it is idempotent. All sarcosomal things are outlandish. Tracey is not kind.", "logic": "\nSarcosomal(tracey)\nforall x (Idempotent(x) and Sarcosomal(x) -> Distressed(x))\nforall x (Outlandish(x) -> Idempotent(x))\nforall x (Sarcosomal(x) -> Outlandish(x))\n\nnot Kind(tracey)\n\nnot Kind(tracey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Rhianon is graven. White, graven things are artesian. If something is phocine then it is aphetic. All graven things are phocine. Rhianon is smart.", "logic": "\nGraven(rhianon)\nforall x (Aphetic(x) and Graven(x) -> Artesian(x))\nforall x (Phocine(x) -> Aphetic(x))\nforall x (Graven(x) -> Phocine(x))\n\nSmart(rhianon)\n\nSmart(rhianon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1325"} {"premises": "Marilin is nitid. Marilin is activated. Marilin is thirteenth. If Marilin is nitid then Marilin is flavorless. All flavorless things are not severed. If Marilin is superb and Marilin is flavorless then Marilin is precious. All superb things are precious. If something is flavorless then it is superb. If something is precious and not flavorless then it is not activated. If something is nitid and precious then it is thirteenth. If something is activated and not severed then it is thirteenth. Marilin is thirteenth.", "logic": "\nNitid(marilin)\nActivated(marilin)\nThirteenth(marilin)\nNitid(marilin) -> Flavorless(marilin)\nforall x (Flavorless(x) -> not Severed(x))\nSuperb(marilin) and Flavorless(marilin) -> Precious(marilin)\nforall x (Superb(x) -> Precious(x))\nforall x (Flavorless(x) -> Superb(x))\nforall x (Precious(x) and not Flavorless(x) -> not Activated(x))\nforall x (Nitid(x) and Precious(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) and not Severed(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\n\nThirteenth(marilin)\n\ntherefore Thirteenth(marilin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Chris is duodecimal. Chris is shodden. Chris is redoubled. If Chris is duodecimal then Chris is vermicular. All vermicular things are not shackled. If Chris is papillary and Chris is vermicular then Chris is annular. All papillary things are annular. If something is vermicular then it is papillary. If something is annular and not vermicular then it is not shodden. If something is duodecimal and annular then it is redoubled. If something is shodden and not shackled then it is redoubled. Chris is not shodden.", "logic": "\nDuodecimal(chris)\nShodden(chris)\nRedoubled(chris)\nDuodecimal(chris) -> Vermicular(chris)\nforall x (Vermicular(x) -> not Shackled(x))\nPapillary(chris) and Vermicular(chris) -> Annular(chris)\nforall x (Papillary(x) -> Annular(x))\nforall x (Vermicular(x) -> Papillary(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) and not Vermicular(x) -> not Shodden(x))\nforall x (Duodecimal(x) and Annular(x) -> Redoubled(x))\nforall x (Shodden(x) and not Shackled(x) -> Redoubled(x))\n\nnot Shodden(chris)\n\ntherefore Shodden(chris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Nikoletta is stewed. Nikoletta is sisyphean. Nikoletta is enwrapped. If Nikoletta is stewed then Nikoletta is coiling. All coiling things are not sumatran. If Nikoletta is wheeled and Nikoletta is coiling then Nikoletta is weepy. All wheeled things are weepy. If something is coiling then it is wheeled. If something is weepy and not coiling then it is not sisyphean. If something is stewed and weepy then it is enwrapped. If something is sisyphean and not sumatran then it is enwrapped. Nikoletta is coiling.", "logic": "\nStewed(nikoletta)\nSisyphean(nikoletta)\nEnwrapped(nikoletta)\nStewed(nikoletta) -> Coiling(nikoletta)\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> not Sumatran(x))\nWheeled(nikoletta) and Coiling(nikoletta) -> Weepy(nikoletta)\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Coiling(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nforall x (Weepy(x) and not Coiling(x) -> not Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) and Weepy(x) -> Enwrapped(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and not Sumatran(x) -> Enwrapped(x))\n\nCoiling(nikoletta)\n\nStewed(nikoletta) and Stewed(nikoletta) -> Coiling(nikoletta) -> therefore Coiling(nikoletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Toinette is unionised. Toinette is bighearted. Toinette is unscripted. If Toinette is unionised then Toinette is violent. All violent things are not inside. If Toinette is self and Toinette is violent then Toinette is citified. All self things are citified. If something is violent then it is self. If something is citified and not violent then it is not bighearted. If something is unionised and citified then it is unscripted. If something is bighearted and not inside then it is unscripted. Toinette is not violent.", "logic": "\nUnionised(toinette)\nBighearted(toinette)\nUnscripted(toinette)\nUnionised(toinette) -> Violent(toinette)\nforall x (Violent(x) -> not Inside(x))\nSelf(toinette) and Violent(toinette) -> Citified(toinette)\nforall x (Self(x) -> Citified(x))\nforall x (Violent(x) -> Self(x))\nforall x (Citified(x) and not Violent(x) -> not Bighearted(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) and Citified(x) -> Unscripted(x))\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and not Inside(x) -> Unscripted(x))\n\nnot Violent(toinette)\n\nUnionised(toinette) and Unionised(toinette) -> Violent(toinette) -> therefore Violent(toinette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Pepito is icelandic. Pepito is placoid. Pepito is shattered. If Pepito is icelandic then Pepito is congestive. All congestive things are not bookish. If Pepito is lowbrow and Pepito is congestive then Pepito is unanalyzed. All lowbrow things are unanalyzed. If something is congestive then it is lowbrow. If something is unanalyzed and not congestive then it is not placoid. If something is icelandic and unanalyzed then it is shattered. If something is placoid and not bookish then it is shattered. Pepito is lowbrow.", "logic": "\nIcelandic(pepito)\nPlacoid(pepito)\nShattered(pepito)\nIcelandic(pepito) -> Congestive(pepito)\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> not Bookish(x))\nLowbrow(pepito) and Congestive(pepito) -> Unanalyzed(pepito)\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Unanalyzed(x))\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\nforall x (Unanalyzed(x) and not Congestive(x) -> not Placoid(x))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) and Unanalyzed(x) -> Shattered(x))\nforall x (Placoid(x) and not Bookish(x) -> Shattered(x))\n\nLowbrow(pepito)\n\nIcelandic(pepito) and Icelandic(pepito) -> Congestive(pepito) -> therefore Congestive(pepito) Congestive(pepito) and forall x (Congestive(x) -> Lowbrow(x)) -> therefore Lowbrow(pepito)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Marne is induced. Marne is rental. Marne is pinchbeck. If Marne is induced then Marne is ratty. All ratty things are not crude. If Marne is subnormal and Marne is ratty then Marne is lutheran. All subnormal things are lutheran. If something is ratty then it is subnormal. If something is lutheran and not ratty then it is not rental. If something is induced and lutheran then it is pinchbeck. If something is rental and not crude then it is pinchbeck. Marne is crude.", "logic": "\nInduced(marne)\nRental(marne)\nPinchbeck(marne)\nInduced(marne) -> Ratty(marne)\nforall x (Ratty(x) -> not Crude(x))\nSubnormal(marne) and Ratty(marne) -> Lutheran(marne)\nforall x (Subnormal(x) -> Lutheran(x))\nforall x (Ratty(x) -> Subnormal(x))\nforall x (Lutheran(x) and not Ratty(x) -> not Rental(x))\nforall x (Induced(x) and Lutheran(x) -> Pinchbeck(x))\nforall x (Rental(x) and not Crude(x) -> Pinchbeck(x))\n\nCrude(marne)\n\nInduced(marne) and Induced(marne) -> Ratty(marne) -> therefore Ratty(marne) Ratty(marne) and forall x (Ratty(x) -> not Crude(x)) -> therefore not Crude(marne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Emily is umptieth. Emily is ectozoan. Emily is plastic. If Emily is umptieth then Emily is schematic. All schematic things are not chummy. If Emily is pyaemic and Emily is schematic then Emily is undersea. All pyaemic things are undersea. If something is schematic then it is pyaemic. If something is undersea and not schematic then it is not ectozoan. If something is umptieth and undersea then it is plastic. If something is ectozoan and not chummy then it is plastic. Emily is undersea.", "logic": "\nUmptieth(emily)\nEctozoan(emily)\nPlastic(emily)\nUmptieth(emily) -> Schematic(emily)\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> not Chummy(x))\nPyaemic(emily) and Schematic(emily) -> Undersea(emily)\nforall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Pyaemic(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) and not Schematic(x) -> not Ectozoan(x))\nforall x (Umptieth(x) and Undersea(x) -> Plastic(x))\nforall x (Ectozoan(x) and not Chummy(x) -> Plastic(x))\n\nUndersea(emily)\n\nUmptieth(emily) and Umptieth(emily) -> Schematic(emily) -> therefore Schematic(emily) Schematic(emily) and forall x (Schematic(x) -> Pyaemic(x)) -> therefore Pyaemic(emily) Pyaemic(emily) and forall x (Pyaemic(x) -> Undersea(x)) -> therefore Undersea(emily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Bird is buxom. Bird is nominated. Bird is surrounded. If Bird is buxom then Bird is somalian. All somalian things are not stalwart. If Bird is toned and Bird is somalian then Bird is loath. All toned things are loath. If something is somalian then it is toned. If something is loath and not somalian then it is not nominated. If something is buxom and loath then it is surrounded. If something is nominated and not stalwart then it is surrounded. Bird is not loath.", "logic": "\nBuxom(bird)\nNominated(bird)\nSurrounded(bird)\nBuxom(bird) -> Somalian(bird)\nforall x (Somalian(x) -> not Stalwart(x))\nToned(bird) and Somalian(bird) -> Loath(bird)\nforall x (Toned(x) -> Loath(x))\nforall x (Somalian(x) -> Toned(x))\nforall x (Loath(x) and not Somalian(x) -> not Nominated(x))\nforall x (Buxom(x) and Loath(x) -> Surrounded(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and not Stalwart(x) -> Surrounded(x))\n\nnot Loath(bird)\n\nBuxom(bird) and Buxom(bird) -> Somalian(bird) -> therefore Somalian(bird) Somalian(bird) and forall x (Somalian(x) -> Toned(x)) -> therefore Toned(bird) Toned(bird) and forall x (Toned(x) -> Loath(x)) -> therefore Loath(bird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-92"} {"premises": "Worthy is nonleaded. Worthy is imposing. Moyra is not imposing. Moyra is inartistic. Moyra is not shorthand. Ermina is nonleaded. Ermina is unremarked. Heywood is unsaddled. Heywood is inartistic. Heywood is shorthand. Blue, nonleaded things are not unsaddled. All imposing things are freeborn. If something is imposing and not unremarked then it is not nonleaded. All unremarked things are inartistic. Young things are inartistic. If Heywood is inartistic and Heywood is unremarked then Heywood is imposing. All imposing, unsaddled things are not shorthand. If Ermina is inartistic then Ermina is imposing. Moyra is not shorthand.", "logic": "\nNonleaded(worthy)\nImposing(worthy)\nnot Imposing(moyra)\nInartistic(moyra)\nnot Shorthand(moyra)\nNonleaded(ermina)\nUnremarked(ermina)\nUnsaddled(heywood)\nInartistic(heywood)\nShorthand(heywood)\nforall x (Freeborn(x) and Nonleaded(x) -> not Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) -> Freeborn(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) and not Unremarked(x) -> not Nonleaded(x))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nInartistic(heywood) and Unremarked(heywood) -> Imposing(heywood)\nforall x (Imposing(x) and Unsaddled(x) -> not Shorthand(x))\nInartistic(ermina) -> Imposing(ermina)\n\nnot Shorthand(moyra)\n\ntherefore not Shorthand(moyra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Binny is stoic. Binny is shakeable. Blanch is not shakeable. Blanch is equitable. Blanch is not feudal. Susette is stoic. Susette is homey. Halley is ghostly. Halley is equitable. Halley is feudal. Blue, stoic things are not ghostly. All shakeable things are dividable. If something is shakeable and not homey then it is not stoic. All homey things are equitable. Young things are equitable. If Halley is equitable and Halley is homey then Halley is shakeable. All shakeable, ghostly things are not feudal. If Susette is equitable then Susette is shakeable. Halley is not equitable.", "logic": "\nStoic(binny)\nShakeable(binny)\nnot Shakeable(blanch)\nEquitable(blanch)\nnot Feudal(blanch)\nStoic(susette)\nHomey(susette)\nGhostly(halley)\nEquitable(halley)\nFeudal(halley)\nforall x (Dividable(x) and Stoic(x) -> not Ghostly(x))\nforall x (Shakeable(x) -> Dividable(x))\nforall x (Shakeable(x) and not Homey(x) -> not Stoic(x))\nforall x (Homey(x) -> Equitable(x))\nforall x (Feudal(x) -> Equitable(x))\nEquitable(halley) and Homey(halley) -> Shakeable(halley)\nforall x (Shakeable(x) and Ghostly(x) -> not Feudal(x))\nEquitable(susette) -> Shakeable(susette)\n\nnot Equitable(halley)\n\ntherefore Equitable(halley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Penelope is supreme. Penelope is capillary. Scott is not capillary. Scott is fantastic. Scott is not insular. Brear is supreme. Brear is apish. Vivian is prudish. Vivian is fantastic. Vivian is insular. Blue, supreme things are not prudish. All capillary things are unsatiable. If something is capillary and not apish then it is not supreme. All apish things are fantastic. Young things are fantastic. If Vivian is fantastic and Vivian is apish then Vivian is capillary. All capillary, prudish things are not insular. If Brear is fantastic then Brear is capillary. Penelope is unsatiable.", "logic": "\nSupreme(penelope)\nCapillary(penelope)\nnot Capillary(scott)\nFantastic(scott)\nnot Insular(scott)\nSupreme(brear)\nApish(brear)\nPrudish(vivian)\nFantastic(vivian)\nInsular(vivian)\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) and Supreme(x) -> not Prudish(x))\nforall x (Capillary(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nforall x (Capillary(x) and not Apish(x) -> not Supreme(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) -> Fantastic(x))\nforall x (Insular(x) -> Fantastic(x))\nFantastic(vivian) and Apish(vivian) -> Capillary(vivian)\nforall x (Capillary(x) and Prudish(x) -> not Insular(x))\nFantastic(brear) -> Capillary(brear)\n\nUnsatiable(penelope)\n\nCapillary(penelope) and forall x (Capillary(x) -> Unsatiable(x)) -> therefore Unsatiable(penelope)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Dyna is mettlesome. Dyna is lamarckian. Karalynn is not lamarckian. Karalynn is pellucid. Karalynn is not arboresque. Eliza is mettlesome. Eliza is flash. Spenser is semiotical. Spenser is pellucid. Spenser is arboresque. Blue, mettlesome things are not semiotical. All lamarckian things are biting. If something is lamarckian and not flash then it is not mettlesome. All flash things are pellucid. Young things are pellucid. If Spenser is pellucid and Spenser is flash then Spenser is lamarckian. All lamarckian, semiotical things are not arboresque. If Eliza is pellucid then Eliza is lamarckian. Dyna is not biting.", "logic": "\nMettlesome(dyna)\nLamarckian(dyna)\nnot Lamarckian(karalynn)\nPellucid(karalynn)\nnot Arboresque(karalynn)\nMettlesome(eliza)\nFlash(eliza)\nSemiotical(spenser)\nPellucid(spenser)\nArboresque(spenser)\nforall x (Biting(x) and Mettlesome(x) -> not Semiotical(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) -> Biting(x))\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) and not Flash(x) -> not Mettlesome(x))\nforall x (Flash(x) -> Pellucid(x))\nforall x (Arboresque(x) -> Pellucid(x))\nPellucid(spenser) and Flash(spenser) -> Lamarckian(spenser)\nforall x (Lamarckian(x) and Semiotical(x) -> not Arboresque(x))\nPellucid(eliza) -> Lamarckian(eliza)\n\nnot Biting(dyna)\n\nLamarckian(dyna) and forall x (Lamarckian(x) -> Biting(x)) -> therefore Biting(dyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Sheilah is botuliform. Sheilah is fulgurous. Jammie is not fulgurous. Jammie is rural. Jammie is not pink. Osbourn is botuliform. Osbourn is unmarked. Jerry is lathery. Jerry is rural. Jerry is pink. Blue, botuliform things are not lathery. All fulgurous things are bicolor. If something is fulgurous and not unmarked then it is not botuliform. All unmarked things are rural. Young things are rural. If Jerry is rural and Jerry is unmarked then Jerry is fulgurous. All fulgurous, lathery things are not pink. If Osbourn is rural then Osbourn is fulgurous. Sheilah is not lathery.", "logic": "\nBotuliform(sheilah)\nFulgurous(sheilah)\nnot Fulgurous(jammie)\nRural(jammie)\nnot Pink(jammie)\nBotuliform(osbourn)\nUnmarked(osbourn)\nLathery(jerry)\nRural(jerry)\nPink(jerry)\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Botuliform(x) -> not Lathery(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Bicolor(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) and not Unmarked(x) -> not Botuliform(x))\nforall x (Unmarked(x) -> Rural(x))\nforall x (Pink(x) -> Rural(x))\nRural(jerry) and Unmarked(jerry) -> Fulgurous(jerry)\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) and Lathery(x) -> not Pink(x))\nRural(osbourn) -> Fulgurous(osbourn)\n\nnot Lathery(sheilah)\n\nFulgurous(sheilah) and forall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Bicolor(x)) -> therefore Bicolor(sheilah) Bicolor(sheilah) and Botuliform(sheilah) and forall x (Bicolor(x) and Botuliform(x) -> not Lathery(x)) -> therefore not Lathery(sheilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Monika is caitiff. Monika is skewed. Dewitt is not skewed. Dewitt is dashed. Dewitt is not primeval. Sheilah is caitiff. Sheilah is abomasal. Bridget is national. Bridget is dashed. Bridget is primeval. Blue, caitiff things are not national. All skewed things are widowed. If something is skewed and not abomasal then it is not caitiff. All abomasal things are dashed. Young things are dashed. If Bridget is dashed and Bridget is abomasal then Bridget is skewed. All skewed, national things are not primeval. If Sheilah is dashed then Sheilah is skewed. Monika is national.", "logic": "\nCaitiff(monika)\nSkewed(monika)\nnot Skewed(dewitt)\nDashed(dewitt)\nnot Primeval(dewitt)\nCaitiff(sheilah)\nAbomasal(sheilah)\nNational(bridget)\nDashed(bridget)\nPrimeval(bridget)\nforall x (Widowed(x) and Caitiff(x) -> not National(x))\nforall x (Skewed(x) -> Widowed(x))\nforall x (Skewed(x) and not Abomasal(x) -> not Caitiff(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Dashed(x))\nforall x (Primeval(x) -> Dashed(x))\nDashed(bridget) and Abomasal(bridget) -> Skewed(bridget)\nforall x (Skewed(x) and National(x) -> not Primeval(x))\nDashed(sheilah) -> Skewed(sheilah)\n\nNational(monika)\n\nSkewed(monika) and forall x (Skewed(x) -> Widowed(x)) -> therefore Widowed(monika) Widowed(monika) and Caitiff(monika) and forall x (Widowed(x) and Caitiff(x) -> not National(x)) -> therefore not National(monika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Allianora is untaught. Allianora is wrong. Norean is not wrong. Norean is unexcused. Norean is not aciculate. Beatrix is untaught. Beatrix is aflare. Sly is grammatic. Sly is unexcused. Sly is aciculate. Blue, untaught things are not grammatic. All wrong things are nonpolar. If something is wrong and not aflare then it is not untaught. All aflare things are unexcused. Young things are unexcused. If Sly is unexcused and Sly is aflare then Sly is wrong. All wrong, grammatic things are not aciculate. If Beatrix is unexcused then Beatrix is wrong. Beatrix is nonpolar.", "logic": "\nUntaught(allianora)\nWrong(allianora)\nnot Wrong(norean)\nUnexcused(norean)\nnot Aciculate(norean)\nUntaught(beatrix)\nAflare(beatrix)\nGrammatic(sly)\nUnexcused(sly)\nAciculate(sly)\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) and Untaught(x) -> not Grammatic(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Nonpolar(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x) and not Aflare(x) -> not Untaught(x))\nforall x (Aflare(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Aciculate(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nUnexcused(sly) and Aflare(sly) -> Wrong(sly)\nforall x (Wrong(x) and Grammatic(x) -> not Aciculate(x))\nUnexcused(beatrix) -> Wrong(beatrix)\n\nNonpolar(beatrix)\n\nAflare(beatrix) and forall x (Aflare(x) -> Unexcused(x)) -> therefore Unexcused(beatrix) Unexcused(beatrix) and Unexcused(beatrix) -> Wrong(beatrix) -> therefore Wrong(beatrix) Wrong(beatrix) and forall x (Wrong(x) -> Nonpolar(x)) -> therefore Nonpolar(beatrix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Ada is faulty. Ada is occupied. Winford is not occupied. Winford is steadied. Winford is not sapid. Merrie is faulty. Merrie is lowland. Kalindi is cyanophyte. Kalindi is steadied. Kalindi is sapid. Blue, faulty things are not cyanophyte. All occupied things are mangy. If something is occupied and not lowland then it is not faulty. All lowland things are steadied. Young things are steadied. If Kalindi is steadied and Kalindi is lowland then Kalindi is occupied. All occupied, cyanophyte things are not sapid. If Merrie is steadied then Merrie is occupied. Merrie is not mangy.", "logic": "\nFaulty(ada)\nOccupied(ada)\nnot Occupied(winford)\nSteadied(winford)\nnot Sapid(winford)\nFaulty(merrie)\nLowland(merrie)\nCyanophyte(kalindi)\nSteadied(kalindi)\nSapid(kalindi)\nforall x (Mangy(x) and Faulty(x) -> not Cyanophyte(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) and not Lowland(x) -> not Faulty(x))\nforall x (Lowland(x) -> Steadied(x))\nforall x (Sapid(x) -> Steadied(x))\nSteadied(kalindi) and Lowland(kalindi) -> Occupied(kalindi)\nforall x (Occupied(x) and Cyanophyte(x) -> not Sapid(x))\nSteadied(merrie) -> Occupied(merrie)\n\nnot Mangy(merrie)\n\nLowland(merrie) and forall x (Lowland(x) -> Steadied(x)) -> therefore Steadied(merrie) Steadied(merrie) and Steadied(merrie) -> Occupied(merrie) -> therefore Occupied(merrie) Occupied(merrie) and forall x (Occupied(x) -> Mangy(x)) -> therefore Mangy(merrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Maryanne is clinking. Maryanne is eerie. Fulvia is not eerie. Fulvia is allusive. Fulvia is not amenable. Walther is clinking. Walther is compounded. Natala is allusive. Natala is allusive. Natala is amenable. Blue, clinking things are not allusive. All eerie things are lowland. If something is eerie and not compounded then it is not clinking. All compounded things are allusive. Young things are allusive. If Natala is allusive and Natala is compounded then Natala is eerie. All eerie, allusive things are not amenable. If Walther is allusive then Walther is eerie. Natala is not eerie.", "logic": "\nClinking(maryanne)\nEerie(maryanne)\nnot Eerie(fulvia)\nAllusive(fulvia)\nnot Amenable(fulvia)\nClinking(walther)\nCompounded(walther)\nAllusive(natala)\nAllusive(natala)\nAmenable(natala)\nforall x (Lowland(x) and Clinking(x) -> not Allusive(x))\nforall x (Eerie(x) -> Lowland(x))\nforall x (Eerie(x) and not Compounded(x) -> not Clinking(x))\nforall x (Compounded(x) -> Allusive(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Allusive(x))\nAllusive(natala) and Compounded(natala) -> Eerie(natala)\nforall x (Eerie(x) and Allusive(x) -> not Amenable(x))\nAllusive(walther) -> Eerie(walther)\n\nnot Eerie(natala)\n\nAllusive(natala) and Compounded(natala) -> Eerie(natala) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Fredrika is tactful. Fredrika is bonzer. Nichol is not bonzer. Nichol is lenten. Nichol is not putrescent. Earle is tactful. Earle is needful. Stafford is garmented. Stafford is lenten. Stafford is putrescent. Blue, tactful things are not garmented. All bonzer things are tilled. If something is bonzer and not needful then it is not tactful. All needful things are lenten. Young things are lenten. If Stafford is lenten and Stafford is needful then Stafford is bonzer. All bonzer, garmented things are not putrescent. If Earle is lenten then Earle is bonzer. Stafford is tilled.", "logic": "\nTactful(fredrika)\nBonzer(fredrika)\nnot Bonzer(nichol)\nLenten(nichol)\nnot Putrescent(nichol)\nTactful(earle)\nNeedful(earle)\nGarmented(stafford)\nLenten(stafford)\nPutrescent(stafford)\nforall x (Tilled(x) and Tactful(x) -> not Garmented(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) -> Tilled(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) and not Needful(x) -> not Tactful(x))\nforall x (Needful(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Lenten(x))\nLenten(stafford) and Needful(stafford) -> Bonzer(stafford)\nforall x (Bonzer(x) and Garmented(x) -> not Putrescent(x))\nLenten(earle) -> Bonzer(earle)\n\nTilled(stafford)\n\nforall x (Bonzer(x) -> Tilled(x)) <- Lenten(stafford) and Needful(stafford) -> Bonzer(stafford) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Anurag is stabile. Anurag is bitumenoid. Latrena is not bitumenoid. Latrena is thorough. Latrena is not mysterious. Goldy is stabile. Goldy is foremost. Bogart is pestered. Bogart is thorough. Bogart is mysterious. Blue, stabile things are not pestered. All bitumenoid things are feral. If something is bitumenoid and not foremost then it is not stabile. All foremost things are thorough. Young things are thorough. If Bogart is thorough and Bogart is foremost then Bogart is bitumenoid. All bitumenoid, pestered things are not mysterious. If Goldy is thorough then Goldy is bitumenoid. Anurag is not thorough.", "logic": "\nStabile(anurag)\nBitumenoid(anurag)\nnot Bitumenoid(latrena)\nThorough(latrena)\nnot Mysterious(latrena)\nStabile(goldy)\nForemost(goldy)\nPestered(bogart)\nThorough(bogart)\nMysterious(bogart)\nforall x (Feral(x) and Stabile(x) -> not Pestered(x))\nforall x (Bitumenoid(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Bitumenoid(x) and not Foremost(x) -> not Stabile(x))\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Thorough(x))\nforall x (Mysterious(x) -> Thorough(x))\nThorough(bogart) and Foremost(bogart) -> Bitumenoid(bogart)\nforall x (Bitumenoid(x) and Pestered(x) -> not Mysterious(x))\nThorough(goldy) -> Bitumenoid(goldy)\n\nnot Thorough(anurag)\n\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Thorough(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Eliot is cumulative. Eliot is permissive. Reece is not permissive. Reece is downfield. Reece is not nonplused. Celina is cumulative. Celina is flaming. Roxane is complex. Roxane is downfield. Roxane is nonplused. Blue, cumulative things are not complex. All permissive things are unpainted. If something is permissive and not flaming then it is not cumulative. All flaming things are downfield. Young things are downfield. If Roxane is downfield and Roxane is flaming then Roxane is permissive. All permissive, complex things are not nonplused. If Celina is downfield then Celina is permissive. Reece is unpainted.", "logic": "\nCumulative(eliot)\nPermissive(eliot)\nnot Permissive(reece)\nDownfield(reece)\nnot Nonplused(reece)\nCumulative(celina)\nFlaming(celina)\nComplex(roxane)\nDownfield(roxane)\nNonplused(roxane)\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Cumulative(x) -> not Complex(x))\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Unpainted(x))\nforall x (Permissive(x) and not Flaming(x) -> not Cumulative(x))\nforall x (Flaming(x) -> Downfield(x))\nforall x (Nonplused(x) -> Downfield(x))\nDownfield(roxane) and Flaming(roxane) -> Permissive(roxane)\nforall x (Permissive(x) and Complex(x) -> not Nonplused(x))\nDownfield(celina) -> Permissive(celina)\n\nUnpainted(reece)\n\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Unpainted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Siobhan is andalusian. Siobhan is unanimated. Rich is not unanimated. Rich is laminal. Rich is not resinated. Candi is andalusian. Candi is keeled. Barnard is lamenting. Barnard is laminal. Barnard is resinated. Blue, andalusian things are not lamenting. All unanimated things are danceable. If something is unanimated and not keeled then it is not andalusian. All keeled things are laminal. Young things are laminal. If Barnard is laminal and Barnard is keeled then Barnard is unanimated. All unanimated, lamenting things are not resinated. If Candi is laminal then Candi is unanimated. Siobhan is not keeled.", "logic": "\nAndalusian(siobhan)\nUnanimated(siobhan)\nnot Unanimated(rich)\nLaminal(rich)\nnot Resinated(rich)\nAndalusian(candi)\nKeeled(candi)\nLamenting(barnard)\nLaminal(barnard)\nResinated(barnard)\nforall x (Danceable(x) and Andalusian(x) -> not Lamenting(x))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) -> Danceable(x))\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and not Keeled(x) -> not Andalusian(x))\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Resinated(x) -> Laminal(x))\nLaminal(barnard) and Keeled(barnard) -> Unanimated(barnard)\nforall x (Unanimated(x) and Lamenting(x) -> not Resinated(x))\nLaminal(candi) -> Unanimated(candi)\n\nnot Keeled(siobhan)\n\nnot Keeled(siobhan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Norrie is footless. Norrie is clitoral. Gilli is not clitoral. Gilli is succeeding. Gilli is not indexical. Ulysses is footless. Ulysses is ruinous. Netta is communist. Netta is succeeding. Netta is indexical. Blue, footless things are not communist. All clitoral things are total. If something is clitoral and not ruinous then it is not footless. All ruinous things are succeeding. Young things are succeeding. If Netta is succeeding and Netta is ruinous then Netta is clitoral. All clitoral, communist things are not indexical. If Ulysses is succeeding then Ulysses is clitoral. Gilli is communist.", "logic": "\nFootless(norrie)\nClitoral(norrie)\nnot Clitoral(gilli)\nSucceeding(gilli)\nnot Indexical(gilli)\nFootless(ulysses)\nRuinous(ulysses)\nCommunist(netta)\nSucceeding(netta)\nIndexical(netta)\nforall x (Total(x) and Footless(x) -> not Communist(x))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) -> Total(x))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) and not Ruinous(x) -> not Footless(x))\nforall x (Ruinous(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nforall x (Indexical(x) -> Succeeding(x))\nSucceeding(netta) and Ruinous(netta) -> Clitoral(netta)\nforall x (Clitoral(x) and Communist(x) -> not Indexical(x))\nSucceeding(ulysses) -> Clitoral(ulysses)\n\nCommunist(gilli)\n\nCommunist(gilli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Florina is beheaded. Florina is unremarked. Heda is not unremarked. Heda is inane. Heda is not religious. Magnum is beheaded. Magnum is mongol. Neille is trifoliate. Neille is inane. Neille is religious. Blue, beheaded things are not trifoliate. All unremarked things are kafkaesque. If something is unremarked and not mongol then it is not beheaded. All mongol things are inane. Young things are inane. If Neille is inane and Neille is mongol then Neille is unremarked. All unremarked, trifoliate things are not religious. If Magnum is inane then Magnum is unremarked. Neille is not mongol.", "logic": "\nBeheaded(florina)\nUnremarked(florina)\nnot Unremarked(heda)\nInane(heda)\nnot Religious(heda)\nBeheaded(magnum)\nMongol(magnum)\nTrifoliate(neille)\nInane(neille)\nReligious(neille)\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) and Beheaded(x) -> not Trifoliate(x))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) -> Kafkaesque(x))\nforall x (Unremarked(x) and not Mongol(x) -> not Beheaded(x))\nforall x (Mongol(x) -> Inane(x))\nforall x (Religious(x) -> Inane(x))\nInane(neille) and Mongol(neille) -> Unremarked(neille)\nforall x (Unremarked(x) and Trifoliate(x) -> not Religious(x))\nInane(magnum) -> Unremarked(magnum)\n\nnot Mongol(neille)\n\nnot Mongol(neille) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "Carla is choked. Carla is semidark. Tomasine is not semidark. Tomasine is ischemic. Tomasine is not mitral. Fonsie is choked. Fonsie is mirky. Sawyer is disgustful. Sawyer is ischemic. Sawyer is mitral. Blue, choked things are not disgustful. All semidark things are dighted. If something is semidark and not mirky then it is not choked. All mirky things are ischemic. Young things are ischemic. If Sawyer is ischemic and Sawyer is mirky then Sawyer is semidark. All semidark, disgustful things are not mitral. If Fonsie is ischemic then Fonsie is semidark. Tomasine is choked.", "logic": "\nChoked(carla)\nSemidark(carla)\nnot Semidark(tomasine)\nIschemic(tomasine)\nnot Mitral(tomasine)\nChoked(fonsie)\nMirky(fonsie)\nDisgustful(sawyer)\nIschemic(sawyer)\nMitral(sawyer)\nforall x (Dighted(x) and Choked(x) -> not Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Dighted(x))\nforall x (Semidark(x) and not Mirky(x) -> not Choked(x))\nforall x (Mirky(x) -> Ischemic(x))\nforall x (Mitral(x) -> Ischemic(x))\nIschemic(sawyer) and Mirky(sawyer) -> Semidark(sawyer)\nforall x (Semidark(x) and Disgustful(x) -> not Mitral(x))\nIschemic(fonsie) -> Semidark(fonsie)\n\nChoked(tomasine)\n\nChoked(tomasine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-443"} {"premises": "The rubina grass the bianca. The rubina is theistical. The rubina is erosive. The rubina is not leglike. The rubina does not need the bianca. The bianca grass the rubina. The bianca is not theistical. The bianca is not leglike. The bianca does not need the rubina. The bianca reunify the rubina. If something reunify the rubina and the rubina grass the bianca then it is crushed. If the rubina reunify the bianca then the bianca does not need the rubina. If something mark the bianca then it grass the bianca. If something is erosive and it reunify the rubina then it grass the bianca. If something mark the rubina and the rubina reunify the bianca then it reunify the rubina. If something is crushed then it mark the bianca. The rubina does not need the bianca.", "logic": "\nGrass(rubina, bianca)\nTheistical(rubina)\nErosive(rubina)\nnot Leglike(rubina)\nnot Mark(rubina, bianca)\nGrass(bianca, rubina)\nnot Theistical(bianca)\nnot Leglike(bianca)\nnot Mark(bianca, rubina)\nReunify(bianca, rubina)\nforall x (Reunify(x, rubina) and Grass(rubina, bianca) -> Crushed(x))\nReunify(rubina, bianca) -> not Mark(bianca, rubina)\nforall x (Mark(x, bianca) -> Grass(x, bianca))\nforall x (Erosive(x) and Reunify(x, rubina) -> Grass(x, bianca))\nforall x (Mark(x, rubina) and Reunify(rubina, bianca) -> Reunify(x, rubina))\nforall x (Crushed(x) -> Mark(x, bianca))\n\nnot Mark(rubina, bianca)\n\ntherefore not Mark(rubina, bianca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The jacenta parole the tamiko. The jacenta is laconic. The jacenta is triangular. The jacenta is not palmy. The jacenta does not need the tamiko. The tamiko parole the jacenta. The tamiko is not laconic. The tamiko is not palmy. The tamiko does not need the jacenta. The tamiko charge the jacenta. If something charge the jacenta and the jacenta parole the tamiko then it is dipolar. If the jacenta charge the tamiko then the tamiko does not need the jacenta. If something reabsorb the tamiko then it parole the tamiko. If something is triangular and it charge the jacenta then it parole the tamiko. If something reabsorb the jacenta and the jacenta charge the tamiko then it charge the jacenta. If something is dipolar then it reabsorb the tamiko. The tamiko is palmy.", "logic": "\nParole(jacenta, tamiko)\nLaconic(jacenta)\nTriangular(jacenta)\nnot Palmy(jacenta)\nnot Reabsorb(jacenta, tamiko)\nParole(tamiko, jacenta)\nnot Laconic(tamiko)\nnot Palmy(tamiko)\nnot Reabsorb(tamiko, jacenta)\nCharge(tamiko, jacenta)\nforall x (Charge(x, jacenta) and Parole(jacenta, tamiko) -> Dipolar(x))\nCharge(jacenta, tamiko) -> not Reabsorb(tamiko, jacenta)\nforall x (Reabsorb(x, tamiko) -> Parole(x, tamiko))\nforall x (Triangular(x) and Charge(x, jacenta) -> Parole(x, tamiko))\nforall x (Reabsorb(x, jacenta) and Charge(jacenta, tamiko) -> Charge(x, jacenta))\nforall x (Dipolar(x) -> Reabsorb(x, tamiko))\n\nPalmy(tamiko)\n\ntherefore not Palmy(tamiko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The muire disinfect the nike. The muire is apiculate. The muire is grecian. The muire is not invariable. The muire does not need the nike. The nike disinfect the muire. The nike is not apiculate. The nike is not invariable. The nike does not need the muire. The nike reconfirm the muire. If something reconfirm the muire and the muire disinfect the nike then it is seated. If the muire reconfirm the nike then the nike does not need the muire. If something stumble the nike then it disinfect the nike. If something is grecian and it reconfirm the muire then it disinfect the nike. If something stumble the muire and the muire reconfirm the nike then it reconfirm the muire. If something is seated then it stumble the nike. The nike is seated.", "logic": "\nDisinfect(muire, nike)\nApiculate(muire)\nGrecian(muire)\nnot Invariable(muire)\nnot Stumble(muire, nike)\nDisinfect(nike, muire)\nnot Apiculate(nike)\nnot Invariable(nike)\nnot Stumble(nike, muire)\nReconfirm(nike, muire)\nforall x (Reconfirm(x, muire) and Disinfect(muire, nike) -> Seated(x))\nReconfirm(muire, nike) -> not Stumble(nike, muire)\nforall x (Stumble(x, nike) -> Disinfect(x, nike))\nforall x (Grecian(x) and Reconfirm(x, muire) -> Disinfect(x, nike))\nforall x (Stumble(x, muire) and Reconfirm(muire, nike) -> Reconfirm(x, muire))\nforall x (Seated(x) -> Stumble(x, nike))\n\nSeated(nike)\n\nReconfirm(nike, muire) and Disinfect(muire, nike) and forall x (Reconfirm(x, muire) and Disinfect(muire, nike) -> Seated(x)) -> therefore Seated(nike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The sharona rejuvenate the roch. The sharona is amphibian. The sharona is lithesome. The sharona is not unroofed. The sharona does not need the roch. The roch rejuvenate the sharona. The roch is not amphibian. The roch is not unroofed. The roch does not need the sharona. The roch sully the sharona. If something sully the sharona and the sharona rejuvenate the roch then it is insincere. If the sharona sully the roch then the roch does not need the sharona. If something gesture the roch then it rejuvenate the roch. If something is lithesome and it sully the sharona then it rejuvenate the roch. If something gesture the sharona and the sharona sully the roch then it sully the sharona. If something is insincere then it gesture the roch. The roch is not insincere.", "logic": "\nRejuvenate(sharona, roch)\nAmphibian(sharona)\nLithesome(sharona)\nnot Unroofed(sharona)\nnot Gesture(sharona, roch)\nRejuvenate(roch, sharona)\nnot Amphibian(roch)\nnot Unroofed(roch)\nnot Gesture(roch, sharona)\nSully(roch, sharona)\nforall x (Sully(x, sharona) and Rejuvenate(sharona, roch) -> Insincere(x))\nSully(sharona, roch) -> not Gesture(roch, sharona)\nforall x (Gesture(x, roch) -> Rejuvenate(x, roch))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) and Sully(x, sharona) -> Rejuvenate(x, roch))\nforall x (Gesture(x, sharona) and Sully(sharona, roch) -> Sully(x, sharona))\nforall x (Insincere(x) -> Gesture(x, roch))\n\nnot Insincere(roch)\n\nSully(roch, sharona) and Rejuvenate(sharona, roch) and forall x (Sully(x, sharona) and Rejuvenate(sharona, roch) -> Insincere(x)) -> therefore Insincere(roch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The angeline nark the venus. The angeline is swart. The angeline is drowsy. The angeline is not comfy. The angeline does not need the venus. The venus nark the angeline. The venus is not swart. The venus is not comfy. The venus does not need the angeline. The venus sportscast the angeline. If something sportscast the angeline and the angeline nark the venus then it is binate. If the angeline sportscast the venus then the venus does not need the angeline. If something brain the venus then it nark the venus. If something is drowsy and it sportscast the angeline then it nark the venus. If something brain the angeline and the angeline sportscast the venus then it sportscast the angeline. If something is binate then it brain the venus. The venus brain the venus.", "logic": "\nNark(angeline, venus)\nSwart(angeline)\nDrowsy(angeline)\nnot Comfy(angeline)\nnot Brain(angeline, venus)\nNark(venus, angeline)\nnot Swart(venus)\nnot Comfy(venus)\nnot Brain(venus, angeline)\nSportscast(venus, angeline)\nforall x (Sportscast(x, angeline) and Nark(angeline, venus) -> Binate(x))\nSportscast(angeline, venus) -> not Brain(venus, angeline)\nforall x (Brain(x, venus) -> Nark(x, venus))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) and Sportscast(x, angeline) -> Nark(x, venus))\nforall x (Brain(x, angeline) and Sportscast(angeline, venus) -> Sportscast(x, angeline))\nforall x (Binate(x) -> Brain(x, venus))\n\nBrain(venus, venus)\n\nSportscast(venus, angeline) and Nark(angeline, venus) and forall x (Sportscast(x, angeline) and Nark(angeline, venus) -> Binate(x)) -> therefore Binate(venus) Binate(venus) and forall x (Binate(x) -> Brain(x, venus)) -> therefore Brain(venus, venus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The marsiella parody the juli. The marsiella is opaline. The marsiella is stinky. The marsiella is not funerary. The marsiella does not need the juli. The juli parody the marsiella. The juli is not opaline. The juli is not funerary. The juli does not need the marsiella. The juli bayonet the marsiella. If something bayonet the marsiella and the marsiella parody the juli then it is dependent. If the marsiella bayonet the juli then the juli does not need the marsiella. If something unburden the juli then it parody the juli. If something is stinky and it bayonet the marsiella then it parody the juli. If something unburden the marsiella and the marsiella bayonet the juli then it bayonet the marsiella. If something is dependent then it unburden the juli. The juli does not need the juli.", "logic": "\nParody(marsiella, juli)\nOpaline(marsiella)\nStinky(marsiella)\nnot Funerary(marsiella)\nnot Unburden(marsiella, juli)\nParody(juli, marsiella)\nnot Opaline(juli)\nnot Funerary(juli)\nnot Unburden(juli, marsiella)\nBayonet(juli, marsiella)\nforall x (Bayonet(x, marsiella) and Parody(marsiella, juli) -> Dependent(x))\nBayonet(marsiella, juli) -> not Unburden(juli, marsiella)\nforall x (Unburden(x, juli) -> Parody(x, juli))\nforall x (Stinky(x) and Bayonet(x, marsiella) -> Parody(x, juli))\nforall x (Unburden(x, marsiella) and Bayonet(marsiella, juli) -> Bayonet(x, marsiella))\nforall x (Dependent(x) -> Unburden(x, juli))\n\nnot Unburden(juli, juli)\n\nBayonet(juli, marsiella) and Parody(marsiella, juli) and forall x (Bayonet(x, marsiella) and Parody(marsiella, juli) -> Dependent(x)) -> therefore Dependent(juli) Dependent(juli) and forall x (Dependent(x) -> Unburden(x, juli)) -> therefore Unburden(juli, juli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The ileane sphacelate the rainer. The ileane is prayerful. The ileane is amphoteric. The ileane is not voluntary. The ileane does not need the rainer. The rainer sphacelate the ileane. The rainer is not prayerful. The rainer is not voluntary. The rainer does not need the ileane. The rainer supinate the ileane. If something supinate the ileane and the ileane sphacelate the rainer then it is steaming. If the ileane supinate the rainer then the rainer does not need the ileane. If something expunge the rainer then it sphacelate the rainer. If something is amphoteric and it supinate the ileane then it sphacelate the rainer. If something expunge the ileane and the ileane supinate the rainer then it supinate the ileane. If something is steaming then it expunge the rainer. The rainer sphacelate the rainer.", "logic": "\nSphacelate(ileane, rainer)\nPrayerful(ileane)\nAmphoteric(ileane)\nnot Voluntary(ileane)\nnot Expunge(ileane, rainer)\nSphacelate(rainer, ileane)\nnot Prayerful(rainer)\nnot Voluntary(rainer)\nnot Expunge(rainer, ileane)\nSupinate(rainer, ileane)\nforall x (Supinate(x, ileane) and Sphacelate(ileane, rainer) -> Steaming(x))\nSupinate(ileane, rainer) -> not Expunge(rainer, ileane)\nforall x (Expunge(x, rainer) -> Sphacelate(x, rainer))\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) and Supinate(x, ileane) -> Sphacelate(x, rainer))\nforall x (Expunge(x, ileane) and Supinate(ileane, rainer) -> Supinate(x, ileane))\nforall x (Steaming(x) -> Expunge(x, rainer))\n\nSphacelate(rainer, rainer)\n\nSupinate(rainer, ileane) and Sphacelate(ileane, rainer) and forall x (Supinate(x, ileane) and Sphacelate(ileane, rainer) -> Steaming(x)) -> therefore Steaming(rainer) Steaming(rainer) and forall x (Steaming(x) -> Expunge(x, rainer)) -> therefore Expunge(rainer, rainer) Expunge(rainer, rainer) and forall x (Expunge(x, rainer) -> Sphacelate(x, rainer)) -> therefore Sphacelate(rainer, rainer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The debby accouter the jojo. The debby is ungulated. The debby is arsenious. The debby is not barmy. The debby does not need the jojo. The jojo accouter the debby. The jojo is not ungulated. The jojo is not barmy. The jojo does not need the debby. The jojo cumber the debby. If something cumber the debby and the debby accouter the jojo then it is poetical. If the debby cumber the jojo then the jojo does not need the debby. If something character the jojo then it accouter the jojo. If something is arsenious and it cumber the debby then it accouter the jojo. If something character the debby and the debby cumber the jojo then it cumber the debby. If something is poetical then it character the jojo. The jojo does not chase the jojo.", "logic": "\nAccouter(debby, jojo)\nUngulated(debby)\nArsenious(debby)\nnot Barmy(debby)\nnot Character(debby, jojo)\nAccouter(jojo, debby)\nnot Ungulated(jojo)\nnot Barmy(jojo)\nnot Character(jojo, debby)\nCumber(jojo, debby)\nforall x (Cumber(x, debby) and Accouter(debby, jojo) -> Poetical(x))\nCumber(debby, jojo) -> not Character(jojo, debby)\nforall x (Character(x, jojo) -> Accouter(x, jojo))\nforall x (Arsenious(x) and Cumber(x, debby) -> Accouter(x, jojo))\nforall x (Character(x, debby) and Cumber(debby, jojo) -> Cumber(x, debby))\nforall x (Poetical(x) -> Character(x, jojo))\n\nnot Accouter(jojo, jojo)\n\nCumber(jojo, debby) and Accouter(debby, jojo) and forall x (Cumber(x, debby) and Accouter(debby, jojo) -> Poetical(x)) -> therefore Poetical(jojo) Poetical(jojo) and forall x (Poetical(x) -> Character(x, jojo)) -> therefore Character(jojo, jojo) Character(jojo, jojo) and forall x (Character(x, jojo) -> Accouter(x, jojo)) -> therefore Accouter(jojo, jojo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The bunny diazotize the carina. The bunny is dividable. The bunny is botryoid. The bunny is not wizardly. The bunny does not need the carina. The carina diazotize the bunny. The carina is not dividable. The carina is not wizardly. The carina does not need the bunny. The carina blither the bunny. If something blither the bunny and the bunny diazotize the carina then it is tyrannical. If the bunny blither the carina then the carina does not need the bunny. If something batch the carina then it diazotize the carina. If something is botryoid and it blither the bunny then it diazotize the carina. If something batch the bunny and the bunny blither the carina then it blither the bunny. If something is tyrannical then it batch the carina. The bunny is not tyrannical.", "logic": "\nDiazotize(bunny, carina)\nDividable(bunny)\nBotryoid(bunny)\nnot Wizardly(bunny)\nnot Batch(bunny, carina)\nDiazotize(carina, bunny)\nnot Dividable(carina)\nnot Wizardly(carina)\nnot Batch(carina, bunny)\nBlither(carina, bunny)\nforall x (Blither(x, bunny) and Diazotize(bunny, carina) -> Tyrannical(x))\nBlither(bunny, carina) -> not Batch(carina, bunny)\nforall x (Batch(x, carina) -> Diazotize(x, carina))\nforall x (Botryoid(x) and Blither(x, bunny) -> Diazotize(x, carina))\nforall x (Batch(x, bunny) and Blither(bunny, carina) -> Blither(x, bunny))\nforall x (Tyrannical(x) -> Batch(x, carina))\n\nnot Tyrannical(bunny)\n\nforall x (Blither(x, bunny) and Diazotize(bunny, carina) -> Tyrannical(x)) <- forall x (Batch(x, bunny) and Blither(bunny, carina) -> Blither(x, bunny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The mamie abstract the louella. The mamie is convincing. The mamie is sequent. The mamie is not bichrome. The mamie does not need the louella. The louella abstract the mamie. The louella is not convincing. The louella is not bichrome. The louella does not need the mamie. The louella steam the mamie. If something steam the mamie and the mamie abstract the louella then it is valid. If the mamie steam the louella then the louella does not need the mamie. If something shear the louella then it abstract the louella. If something is sequent and it steam the mamie then it abstract the louella. If something shear the mamie and the mamie steam the louella then it steam the mamie. If something is valid then it shear the louella. The mamie steam the mamie.", "logic": "\nAbstract(mamie, louella)\nConvincing(mamie)\nSequent(mamie)\nnot Bichrome(mamie)\nnot Shear(mamie, louella)\nAbstract(louella, mamie)\nnot Convincing(louella)\nnot Bichrome(louella)\nnot Shear(louella, mamie)\nSteam(louella, mamie)\nforall x (Steam(x, mamie) and Abstract(mamie, louella) -> Valid(x))\nSteam(mamie, louella) -> not Shear(louella, mamie)\nforall x (Shear(x, louella) -> Abstract(x, louella))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Steam(x, mamie) -> Abstract(x, louella))\nforall x (Shear(x, mamie) and Steam(mamie, louella) -> Steam(x, mamie))\nforall x (Valid(x) -> Shear(x, louella))\n\nSteam(mamie, mamie)\n\nforall x (Shear(x, mamie) and Steam(mamie, louella) -> Steam(x, mamie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The harcourt fire the franky. The harcourt is mandibular. The harcourt is suasible. The harcourt is not landscaped. The harcourt does not need the franky. The franky fire the harcourt. The franky is not mandibular. The franky is not landscaped. The franky does not need the harcourt. The franky bottom the harcourt. If something bottom the harcourt and the harcourt fire the franky then it is currish. If the harcourt bottom the franky then the franky does not need the harcourt. If something glimmer the franky then it fire the franky. If something is suasible and it bottom the harcourt then it fire the franky. If something glimmer the harcourt and the harcourt bottom the franky then it bottom the harcourt. If something is currish then it glimmer the franky. The harcourt does not need the harcourt.", "logic": "\nFire(harcourt, franky)\nMandibular(harcourt)\nSuasible(harcourt)\nnot Landscaped(harcourt)\nnot Glimmer(harcourt, franky)\nFire(franky, harcourt)\nnot Mandibular(franky)\nnot Landscaped(franky)\nnot Glimmer(franky, harcourt)\nBottom(franky, harcourt)\nforall x (Bottom(x, harcourt) and Fire(harcourt, franky) -> Currish(x))\nBottom(harcourt, franky) -> not Glimmer(franky, harcourt)\nforall x (Glimmer(x, franky) -> Fire(x, franky))\nforall x (Suasible(x) and Bottom(x, harcourt) -> Fire(x, franky))\nforall x (Glimmer(x, harcourt) and Bottom(harcourt, franky) -> Bottom(x, harcourt))\nforall x (Currish(x) -> Glimmer(x, franky))\n\nnot Glimmer(harcourt, harcourt)\n\nnot Glimmer(harcourt, harcourt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The wilhelm imperil the ariela. The wilhelm is clumsy. The wilhelm is eighth. The wilhelm is not witching. The wilhelm does not need the ariela. The ariela imperil the wilhelm. The ariela is not clumsy. The ariela is not witching. The ariela does not need the wilhelm. The ariela blackball the wilhelm. If something blackball the wilhelm and the wilhelm imperil the ariela then it is prankish. If the wilhelm blackball the ariela then the ariela does not need the wilhelm. If something engineer the ariela then it imperil the ariela. If something is eighth and it blackball the wilhelm then it imperil the ariela. If something engineer the wilhelm and the wilhelm blackball the ariela then it blackball the wilhelm. If something is prankish then it engineer the ariela. The ariela is eighth.", "logic": "\nImperil(wilhelm, ariela)\nClumsy(wilhelm)\nEighth(wilhelm)\nnot Witching(wilhelm)\nnot Engineer(wilhelm, ariela)\nImperil(ariela, wilhelm)\nnot Clumsy(ariela)\nnot Witching(ariela)\nnot Engineer(ariela, wilhelm)\nBlackball(ariela, wilhelm)\nforall x (Blackball(x, wilhelm) and Imperil(wilhelm, ariela) -> Prankish(x))\nBlackball(wilhelm, ariela) -> not Engineer(ariela, wilhelm)\nforall x (Engineer(x, ariela) -> Imperil(x, ariela))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Blackball(x, wilhelm) -> Imperil(x, ariela))\nforall x (Engineer(x, wilhelm) and Blackball(wilhelm, ariela) -> Blackball(x, wilhelm))\nforall x (Prankish(x) -> Engineer(x, ariela))\n\nEighth(ariela)\n\nEighth(ariela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The penn solidify the sussi. The penn is prolonged. The penn is cruel. The penn is not ungoverned. The penn does not need the sussi. The sussi solidify the penn. The sussi is not prolonged. The sussi is not ungoverned. The sussi does not need the penn. The sussi provoke the penn. If something provoke the penn and the penn solidify the sussi then it is specular. If the penn provoke the sussi then the sussi does not need the penn. If something clown the sussi then it solidify the sussi. If something is cruel and it provoke the penn then it solidify the sussi. If something clown the penn and the penn provoke the sussi then it provoke the penn. If something is specular then it clown the sussi. The sussi is not rough.", "logic": "\nSolidify(penn, sussi)\nProlonged(penn)\nCruel(penn)\nnot Ungoverned(penn)\nnot Clown(penn, sussi)\nSolidify(sussi, penn)\nnot Prolonged(sussi)\nnot Ungoverned(sussi)\nnot Clown(sussi, penn)\nProvoke(sussi, penn)\nforall x (Provoke(x, penn) and Solidify(penn, sussi) -> Specular(x))\nProvoke(penn, sussi) -> not Clown(sussi, penn)\nforall x (Clown(x, sussi) -> Solidify(x, sussi))\nforall x (Cruel(x) and Provoke(x, penn) -> Solidify(x, sussi))\nforall x (Clown(x, penn) and Provoke(penn, sussi) -> Provoke(x, penn))\nforall x (Specular(x) -> Clown(x, sussi))\n\nnot Rough(sussi)\n\nnot Rough(sussi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The kesley fare the kristin. The kesley is potent. The kesley is limbic. The kesley is not definitive. The kesley does not need the kristin. The kristin fare the kesley. The kristin is not potent. The kristin is not definitive. The kristin does not need the kesley. The kristin lace the kesley. If something lace the kesley and the kesley fare the kristin then it is akimbo. If the kesley lace the kristin then the kristin does not need the kesley. If something interdict the kristin then it fare the kristin. If something is limbic and it lace the kesley then it fare the kristin. If something interdict the kesley and the kesley lace the kristin then it lace the kesley. If something is akimbo then it interdict the kristin. The kristin lace the kristin.", "logic": "\nFare(kesley, kristin)\nPotent(kesley)\nLimbic(kesley)\nnot Definitive(kesley)\nnot Interdict(kesley, kristin)\nFare(kristin, kesley)\nnot Potent(kristin)\nnot Definitive(kristin)\nnot Interdict(kristin, kesley)\nLace(kristin, kesley)\nforall x (Lace(x, kesley) and Fare(kesley, kristin) -> Akimbo(x))\nLace(kesley, kristin) -> not Interdict(kristin, kesley)\nforall x (Interdict(x, kristin) -> Fare(x, kristin))\nforall x (Limbic(x) and Lace(x, kesley) -> Fare(x, kristin))\nforall x (Interdict(x, kesley) and Lace(kesley, kristin) -> Lace(x, kesley))\nforall x (Akimbo(x) -> Interdict(x, kristin))\n\nLace(kristin, kristin)\n\nLace(kristin, kristin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The loni frequent the geoffrey. The loni is intoned. The loni is lamblike. The loni is not lonely. The loni does not need the geoffrey. The geoffrey frequent the loni. The geoffrey is not intoned. The geoffrey is not lonely. The geoffrey does not need the loni. The geoffrey subtilise the loni. If something subtilise the loni and the loni frequent the geoffrey then it is crummy. If the loni subtilise the geoffrey then the geoffrey does not need the loni. If something defy the geoffrey then it frequent the geoffrey. If something is lamblike and it subtilise the loni then it frequent the geoffrey. If something defy the loni and the loni subtilise the geoffrey then it subtilise the loni. If something is crummy then it defy the geoffrey. The loni is not rough.", "logic": "\nFrequent(loni, geoffrey)\nIntoned(loni)\nLamblike(loni)\nnot Lonely(loni)\nnot Defy(loni, geoffrey)\nFrequent(geoffrey, loni)\nnot Intoned(geoffrey)\nnot Lonely(geoffrey)\nnot Defy(geoffrey, loni)\nSubtilise(geoffrey, loni)\nforall x (Subtilise(x, loni) and Frequent(loni, geoffrey) -> Crummy(x))\nSubtilise(loni, geoffrey) -> not Defy(geoffrey, loni)\nforall x (Defy(x, geoffrey) -> Frequent(x, geoffrey))\nforall x (Lamblike(x) and Subtilise(x, loni) -> Frequent(x, geoffrey))\nforall x (Defy(x, loni) and Subtilise(loni, geoffrey) -> Subtilise(x, loni))\nforall x (Crummy(x) -> Defy(x, geoffrey))\n\nnot Rough(loni)\n\nnot Rough(loni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The rhoda tenure the adel. The rhoda is ascendible. The rhoda is tremendous. The rhoda is not partizan. The rhoda does not need the adel. The adel tenure the rhoda. The adel is not ascendible. The adel is not partizan. The adel does not need the rhoda. The adel bewail the rhoda. If something bewail the rhoda and the rhoda tenure the adel then it is prohibited. If the rhoda bewail the adel then the adel does not need the rhoda. If something cheat the adel then it tenure the adel. If something is tremendous and it bewail the rhoda then it tenure the adel. If something cheat the rhoda and the rhoda bewail the adel then it bewail the rhoda. If something is prohibited then it cheat the adel. The rhoda bewail the adel.", "logic": "\nTenure(rhoda, adel)\nAscendible(rhoda)\nTremendous(rhoda)\nnot Partizan(rhoda)\nnot Cheat(rhoda, adel)\nTenure(adel, rhoda)\nnot Ascendible(adel)\nnot Partizan(adel)\nnot Cheat(adel, rhoda)\nBewail(adel, rhoda)\nforall x (Bewail(x, rhoda) and Tenure(rhoda, adel) -> Prohibited(x))\nBewail(rhoda, adel) -> not Cheat(adel, rhoda)\nforall x (Cheat(x, adel) -> Tenure(x, adel))\nforall x (Tremendous(x) and Bewail(x, rhoda) -> Tenure(x, adel))\nforall x (Cheat(x, rhoda) and Bewail(rhoda, adel) -> Bewail(x, rhoda))\nforall x (Prohibited(x) -> Cheat(x, adel))\n\nBewail(rhoda, adel)\n\nBewail(rhoda, adel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "The rodina is harnessed. The rodina is variolous. The rodina prate the kelwin. The rodina prate the tobiah. The rodina obtrude the kelwin. The rodina obtrude the tobiah. The kelwin is principled. The kelwin is repayable. The kelwin is embryonal. The kelwin prate the rodina. The kelwin obtrude the rodina. The tobiah is principled. The tobiah prate the rodina. The tobiah prate the kelwin. The tobiah obtrude the kelwin. If the tobiah obtrude the rodina then the rodina bombproof the tobiah. If something obtrude the kelwin then it is variolous. If the kelwin is variolous and the kelwin is embryonal then the kelwin obtrude the rodina. If something is variolous and it prate the kelwin then it obtrude the rodina. If something is variolous and it bombproof the kelwin then it obtrude the tobiah. If something prate the kelwin then it bombproof the kelwin. The rodina is harnessed.", "logic": "\nHarnessed(rodina)\nVariolous(rodina)\nPrate(rodina, kelwin)\nPrate(rodina, tobiah)\nObtrude(rodina, kelwin)\nObtrude(rodina, tobiah)\nPrincipled(kelwin)\nRepayable(kelwin)\nEmbryonal(kelwin)\nPrate(kelwin, rodina)\nObtrude(kelwin, rodina)\nPrincipled(tobiah)\nPrate(tobiah, rodina)\nPrate(tobiah, kelwin)\nObtrude(tobiah, kelwin)\nObtrude(tobiah, rodina) -> Bombproof(rodina, tobiah)\nforall x (Obtrude(x, kelwin) -> Variolous(x))\nVariolous(kelwin) and Embryonal(kelwin) -> Obtrude(kelwin, rodina)\nforall x (Variolous(x) and Prate(x, kelwin) -> Obtrude(x, rodina))\nforall x (Variolous(x) and Bombproof(x, kelwin) -> Obtrude(x, tobiah))\nforall x (Prate(x, kelwin) -> Bombproof(x, kelwin))\n\nHarnessed(rodina)\n\ntherefore Harnessed(rodina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The anita is functional. The anita is spangly. The anita scrub the cindie. The anita scrub the samantha. The anita consecrate the cindie. The anita consecrate the samantha. The cindie is servile. The cindie is floored. The cindie is honied. The cindie scrub the anita. The cindie consecrate the anita. The samantha is servile. The samantha scrub the anita. The samantha scrub the cindie. The samantha consecrate the cindie. If the samantha consecrate the anita then the anita flounce the samantha. If something consecrate the cindie then it is spangly. If the cindie is spangly and the cindie is honied then the cindie consecrate the anita. If something is spangly and it scrub the cindie then it consecrate the anita. If something is spangly and it flounce the cindie then it consecrate the samantha. If something scrub the cindie then it flounce the cindie. The cindie does not see the anita.", "logic": "\nFunctional(anita)\nSpangly(anita)\nScrub(anita, cindie)\nScrub(anita, samantha)\nConsecrate(anita, cindie)\nConsecrate(anita, samantha)\nServile(cindie)\nFloored(cindie)\nHonied(cindie)\nScrub(cindie, anita)\nConsecrate(cindie, anita)\nServile(samantha)\nScrub(samantha, anita)\nScrub(samantha, cindie)\nConsecrate(samantha, cindie)\nConsecrate(samantha, anita) -> Flounce(anita, samantha)\nforall x (Consecrate(x, cindie) -> Spangly(x))\nSpangly(cindie) and Honied(cindie) -> Consecrate(cindie, anita)\nforall x (Spangly(x) and Scrub(x, cindie) -> Consecrate(x, anita))\nforall x (Spangly(x) and Flounce(x, cindie) -> Consecrate(x, samantha))\nforall x (Scrub(x, cindie) -> Flounce(x, cindie))\n\nnot Consecrate(cindie, anita)\n\ntherefore Consecrate(cindie, anita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The sher is unrhythmic. The sher is extendable. The sher constipate the noelle. The sher constipate the jaine. The sher strive the noelle. The sher strive the jaine. The noelle is ruling. The noelle is faraway. The noelle is stabilized. The noelle constipate the sher. The noelle strive the sher. The jaine is ruling. The jaine constipate the sher. The jaine constipate the noelle. The jaine strive the noelle. If the jaine strive the sher then the sher article the jaine. If something strive the noelle then it is extendable. If the noelle is extendable and the noelle is stabilized then the noelle strive the sher. If something is extendable and it constipate the noelle then it strive the sher. If something is extendable and it article the noelle then it strive the jaine. If something constipate the noelle then it article the noelle. The jaine article the noelle.", "logic": "\nUnrhythmic(sher)\nExtendable(sher)\nConstipate(sher, noelle)\nConstipate(sher, jaine)\nStrive(sher, noelle)\nStrive(sher, jaine)\nRuling(noelle)\nFaraway(noelle)\nStabilized(noelle)\nConstipate(noelle, sher)\nStrive(noelle, sher)\nRuling(jaine)\nConstipate(jaine, sher)\nConstipate(jaine, noelle)\nStrive(jaine, noelle)\nStrive(jaine, sher) -> Article(sher, jaine)\nforall x (Strive(x, noelle) -> Extendable(x))\nExtendable(noelle) and Stabilized(noelle) -> Strive(noelle, sher)\nforall x (Extendable(x) and Constipate(x, noelle) -> Strive(x, sher))\nforall x (Extendable(x) and Article(x, noelle) -> Strive(x, jaine))\nforall x (Constipate(x, noelle) -> Article(x, noelle))\n\nArticle(jaine, noelle)\n\nConstipate(jaine, noelle) and forall x (Constipate(x, noelle) -> Article(x, noelle)) -> therefore Article(jaine, noelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The cinda is sloping. The cinda is lovesick. The cinda bungle the tyson. The cinda bungle the kaile. The cinda hobnob the tyson. The cinda hobnob the kaile. The tyson is flying. The tyson is joint. The tyson is reflex. The tyson bungle the cinda. The tyson hobnob the cinda. The kaile is flying. The kaile bungle the cinda. The kaile bungle the tyson. The kaile hobnob the tyson. If the kaile hobnob the cinda then the cinda constipate the kaile. If something hobnob the tyson then it is lovesick. If the tyson is lovesick and the tyson is reflex then the tyson hobnob the cinda. If something is lovesick and it bungle the tyson then it hobnob the cinda. If something is lovesick and it constipate the tyson then it hobnob the kaile. If something bungle the tyson then it constipate the tyson. The kaile does not visit the tyson.", "logic": "\nSloping(cinda)\nLovesick(cinda)\nBungle(cinda, tyson)\nBungle(cinda, kaile)\nHobnob(cinda, tyson)\nHobnob(cinda, kaile)\nFlying(tyson)\nJoint(tyson)\nReflex(tyson)\nBungle(tyson, cinda)\nHobnob(tyson, cinda)\nFlying(kaile)\nBungle(kaile, cinda)\nBungle(kaile, tyson)\nHobnob(kaile, tyson)\nHobnob(kaile, cinda) -> Constipate(cinda, kaile)\nforall x (Hobnob(x, tyson) -> Lovesick(x))\nLovesick(tyson) and Reflex(tyson) -> Hobnob(tyson, cinda)\nforall x (Lovesick(x) and Bungle(x, tyson) -> Hobnob(x, cinda))\nforall x (Lovesick(x) and Constipate(x, tyson) -> Hobnob(x, kaile))\nforall x (Bungle(x, tyson) -> Constipate(x, tyson))\n\nnot Constipate(kaile, tyson)\n\nBungle(kaile, tyson) and forall x (Bungle(x, tyson) -> Constipate(x, tyson)) -> therefore Constipate(kaile, tyson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The shina is disjointed. The shina is clamant. The shina grope the mason. The shina grope the clemmy. The shina bodypaint the mason. The shina bodypaint the clemmy. The mason is kafkaesque. The mason is untanned. The mason is poky. The mason grope the shina. The mason bodypaint the shina. The clemmy is kafkaesque. The clemmy grope the shina. The clemmy grope the mason. The clemmy bodypaint the mason. If the clemmy bodypaint the shina then the shina erect the clemmy. If something bodypaint the mason then it is clamant. If the mason is clamant and the mason is poky then the mason bodypaint the shina. If something is clamant and it grope the mason then it bodypaint the shina. If something is clamant and it erect the mason then it bodypaint the clemmy. If something grope the mason then it erect the mason. The clemmy bodypaint the shina.", "logic": "\nDisjointed(shina)\nClamant(shina)\nGrope(shina, mason)\nGrope(shina, clemmy)\nBodypaint(shina, mason)\nBodypaint(shina, clemmy)\nKafkaesque(mason)\nUntanned(mason)\nPoky(mason)\nGrope(mason, shina)\nBodypaint(mason, shina)\nKafkaesque(clemmy)\nGrope(clemmy, shina)\nGrope(clemmy, mason)\nBodypaint(clemmy, mason)\nBodypaint(clemmy, shina) -> Erect(shina, clemmy)\nforall x (Bodypaint(x, mason) -> Clamant(x))\nClamant(mason) and Poky(mason) -> Bodypaint(mason, shina)\nforall x (Clamant(x) and Grope(x, mason) -> Bodypaint(x, shina))\nforall x (Clamant(x) and Erect(x, mason) -> Bodypaint(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Grope(x, mason) -> Erect(x, mason))\n\nBodypaint(clemmy, shina)\n\nBodypaint(clemmy, mason) and forall x (Bodypaint(x, mason) -> Clamant(x)) -> therefore Clamant(clemmy) Clamant(clemmy) and Grope(clemmy, mason) and forall x (Clamant(x) and Grope(x, mason) -> Bodypaint(x, shina)) -> therefore Bodypaint(clemmy, shina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The alexander is nodular. The alexander is pretorian. The alexander speechify the gavra. The alexander speechify the towny. The alexander sparkle the gavra. The alexander sparkle the towny. The gavra is moneyless. The gavra is dependant. The gavra is commercial. The gavra speechify the alexander. The gavra sparkle the alexander. The towny is moneyless. The towny speechify the alexander. The towny speechify the gavra. The towny sparkle the gavra. If the towny sparkle the alexander then the alexander uncross the towny. If something sparkle the gavra then it is pretorian. If the gavra is pretorian and the gavra is commercial then the gavra sparkle the alexander. If something is pretorian and it speechify the gavra then it sparkle the alexander. If something is pretorian and it uncross the gavra then it sparkle the towny. If something speechify the gavra then it uncross the gavra. The towny does not see the towny.", "logic": "\nNodular(alexander)\nPretorian(alexander)\nSpeechify(alexander, gavra)\nSpeechify(alexander, towny)\nSparkle(alexander, gavra)\nSparkle(alexander, towny)\nMoneyless(gavra)\nDependant(gavra)\nCommercial(gavra)\nSpeechify(gavra, alexander)\nSparkle(gavra, alexander)\nMoneyless(towny)\nSpeechify(towny, alexander)\nSpeechify(towny, gavra)\nSparkle(towny, gavra)\nSparkle(towny, alexander) -> Uncross(alexander, towny)\nforall x (Sparkle(x, gavra) -> Pretorian(x))\nPretorian(gavra) and Commercial(gavra) -> Sparkle(gavra, alexander)\nforall x (Pretorian(x) and Speechify(x, gavra) -> Sparkle(x, alexander))\nforall x (Pretorian(x) and Uncross(x, gavra) -> Sparkle(x, towny))\nforall x (Speechify(x, gavra) -> Uncross(x, gavra))\n\nnot Sparkle(towny, towny)\n\nSparkle(towny, gavra) and forall x (Sparkle(x, gavra) -> Pretorian(x)) -> therefore Pretorian(towny) Speechify(towny, gavra) and forall x (Speechify(x, gavra) -> Uncross(x, gavra)) -> therefore Uncross(towny, gavra) Pretorian(towny) and Uncross(towny, gavra) and forall x (Pretorian(x) and Uncross(x, gavra) -> Sparkle(x, towny)) -> therefore Sparkle(towny, towny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The pier is unstudious. The pier is cetaceous. The pier interview the chloe. The pier interview the butch. The pier disappoint the chloe. The pier disappoint the butch. The chloe is dexter. The chloe is unreserved. The chloe is diarrhoeal. The chloe interview the pier. The chloe disappoint the pier. The butch is dexter. The butch interview the pier. The butch interview the chloe. The butch disappoint the chloe. If the butch disappoint the pier then the pier lade the butch. If something disappoint the chloe then it is cetaceous. If the chloe is cetaceous and the chloe is diarrhoeal then the chloe disappoint the pier. If something is cetaceous and it interview the chloe then it disappoint the pier. If something is cetaceous and it lade the chloe then it disappoint the butch. If something interview the chloe then it lade the chloe. The pier lade the butch.", "logic": "\nUnstudious(pier)\nCetaceous(pier)\nInterview(pier, chloe)\nInterview(pier, butch)\nDisappoint(pier, chloe)\nDisappoint(pier, butch)\nDexter(chloe)\nUnreserved(chloe)\nDiarrhoeal(chloe)\nInterview(chloe, pier)\nDisappoint(chloe, pier)\nDexter(butch)\nInterview(butch, pier)\nInterview(butch, chloe)\nDisappoint(butch, chloe)\nDisappoint(butch, pier) -> Lade(pier, butch)\nforall x (Disappoint(x, chloe) -> Cetaceous(x))\nCetaceous(chloe) and Diarrhoeal(chloe) -> Disappoint(chloe, pier)\nforall x (Cetaceous(x) and Interview(x, chloe) -> Disappoint(x, pier))\nforall x (Cetaceous(x) and Lade(x, chloe) -> Disappoint(x, butch))\nforall x (Interview(x, chloe) -> Lade(x, chloe))\n\nLade(pier, butch)\n\nDisappoint(butch, chloe) and forall x (Disappoint(x, chloe) -> Cetaceous(x)) -> therefore Cetaceous(butch) Cetaceous(butch) and Interview(butch, chloe) and forall x (Cetaceous(x) and Interview(x, chloe) -> Disappoint(x, pier)) -> therefore Disappoint(butch, pier) Disappoint(butch, pier) and Disappoint(butch, pier) -> Lade(pier, butch) -> therefore Lade(pier, butch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The donnie is beneficed. The donnie is vendable. The donnie cosset the karalee. The donnie cosset the reagan. The donnie love the karalee. The donnie love the reagan. The karalee is neuronal. The karalee is uncordial. The karalee is tunisian. The karalee cosset the donnie. The karalee love the donnie. The reagan is neuronal. The reagan cosset the donnie. The reagan cosset the karalee. The reagan love the karalee. If the reagan love the donnie then the donnie redound the reagan. If something love the karalee then it is vendable. If the karalee is vendable and the karalee is tunisian then the karalee love the donnie. If something is vendable and it cosset the karalee then it love the donnie. If something is vendable and it redound the karalee then it love the reagan. If something cosset the karalee then it redound the karalee. The donnie does not visit the reagan.", "logic": "\nBeneficed(donnie)\nVendable(donnie)\nCosset(donnie, karalee)\nCosset(donnie, reagan)\nLove(donnie, karalee)\nLove(donnie, reagan)\nNeuronal(karalee)\nUncordial(karalee)\nTunisian(karalee)\nCosset(karalee, donnie)\nLove(karalee, donnie)\nNeuronal(reagan)\nCosset(reagan, donnie)\nCosset(reagan, karalee)\nLove(reagan, karalee)\nLove(reagan, donnie) -> Redound(donnie, reagan)\nforall x (Love(x, karalee) -> Vendable(x))\nVendable(karalee) and Tunisian(karalee) -> Love(karalee, donnie)\nforall x (Vendable(x) and Cosset(x, karalee) -> Love(x, donnie))\nforall x (Vendable(x) and Redound(x, karalee) -> Love(x, reagan))\nforall x (Cosset(x, karalee) -> Redound(x, karalee))\n\nnot Redound(donnie, reagan)\n\nLove(reagan, karalee) and forall x (Love(x, karalee) -> Vendable(x)) -> therefore Vendable(reagan) Vendable(reagan) and Cosset(reagan, karalee) and forall x (Vendable(x) and Cosset(x, karalee) -> Love(x, donnie)) -> therefore Love(reagan, donnie) Love(reagan, donnie) and Love(reagan, donnie) -> Redound(donnie, reagan) -> therefore Redound(donnie, reagan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The loleta is detachable. The loleta is polydactyl. The loleta reinstall the willyt. The loleta reinstall the aron. The loleta neighbour the willyt. The loleta neighbour the aron. The willyt is burrlike. The willyt is fastigiate. The willyt is mercurous. The willyt reinstall the loleta. The willyt neighbour the loleta. The aron is burrlike. The aron reinstall the loleta. The aron reinstall the willyt. The aron neighbour the willyt. If the aron neighbour the loleta then the loleta wrawl the aron. If something neighbour the willyt then it is polydactyl. If the willyt is polydactyl and the willyt is mercurous then the willyt neighbour the loleta. If something is polydactyl and it reinstall the willyt then it neighbour the loleta. If something is polydactyl and it wrawl the willyt then it neighbour the aron. If something reinstall the willyt then it wrawl the willyt. The willyt does not visit the willyt.", "logic": "\nDetachable(loleta)\nPolydactyl(loleta)\nReinstall(loleta, willyt)\nReinstall(loleta, aron)\nNeighbour(loleta, willyt)\nNeighbour(loleta, aron)\nBurrlike(willyt)\nFastigiate(willyt)\nMercurous(willyt)\nReinstall(willyt, loleta)\nNeighbour(willyt, loleta)\nBurrlike(aron)\nReinstall(aron, loleta)\nReinstall(aron, willyt)\nNeighbour(aron, willyt)\nNeighbour(aron, loleta) -> Wrawl(loleta, aron)\nforall x (Neighbour(x, willyt) -> Polydactyl(x))\nPolydactyl(willyt) and Mercurous(willyt) -> Neighbour(willyt, loleta)\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Reinstall(x, willyt) -> Neighbour(x, loleta))\nforall x (Polydactyl(x) and Wrawl(x, willyt) -> Neighbour(x, aron))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, willyt) -> Wrawl(x, willyt))\n\nnot Wrawl(willyt, willyt)\n\nforall x (Reinstall(x, willyt) -> Wrawl(x, willyt)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The mirelle is lubricated. The mirelle is nonmetal. The mirelle listen the blakelee. The mirelle listen the leonelle. The mirelle reflect the blakelee. The mirelle reflect the leonelle. The blakelee is affordable. The blakelee is encased. The blakelee is eukaryotic. The blakelee listen the mirelle. The blakelee reflect the mirelle. The leonelle is affordable. The leonelle listen the mirelle. The leonelle listen the blakelee. The leonelle reflect the blakelee. If the leonelle reflect the mirelle then the mirelle weave the leonelle. If something reflect the blakelee then it is nonmetal. If the blakelee is nonmetal and the blakelee is eukaryotic then the blakelee reflect the mirelle. If something is nonmetal and it listen the blakelee then it reflect the mirelle. If something is nonmetal and it weave the blakelee then it reflect the leonelle. If something listen the blakelee then it weave the blakelee. The blakelee reflect the leonelle.", "logic": "\nLubricated(mirelle)\nNonmetal(mirelle)\nListen(mirelle, blakelee)\nListen(mirelle, leonelle)\nReflect(mirelle, blakelee)\nReflect(mirelle, leonelle)\nAffordable(blakelee)\nEncased(blakelee)\nEukaryotic(blakelee)\nListen(blakelee, mirelle)\nReflect(blakelee, mirelle)\nAffordable(leonelle)\nListen(leonelle, mirelle)\nListen(leonelle, blakelee)\nReflect(leonelle, blakelee)\nReflect(leonelle, mirelle) -> Weave(mirelle, leonelle)\nforall x (Reflect(x, blakelee) -> Nonmetal(x))\nNonmetal(blakelee) and Eukaryotic(blakelee) -> Reflect(blakelee, mirelle)\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) and Listen(x, blakelee) -> Reflect(x, mirelle))\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) and Weave(x, blakelee) -> Reflect(x, leonelle))\nforall x (Listen(x, blakelee) -> Weave(x, blakelee))\n\nReflect(blakelee, leonelle)\n\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) and Weave(x, blakelee) -> Reflect(x, leonelle)) <- forall x (Reflect(x, blakelee) -> Nonmetal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The willow is unfretted. The willow is radiating. The willow besmear the moyra. The willow besmear the rhea. The willow manicure the moyra. The willow manicure the rhea. The moyra is fantastic. The moyra is xenogeneic. The moyra is pestering. The moyra besmear the willow. The moyra manicure the willow. The rhea is fantastic. The rhea besmear the willow. The rhea besmear the moyra. The rhea manicure the moyra. If the rhea manicure the willow then the willow speak the rhea. If something manicure the moyra then it is radiating. If the moyra is radiating and the moyra is pestering then the moyra manicure the willow. If something is radiating and it besmear the moyra then it manicure the willow. If something is radiating and it speak the moyra then it manicure the rhea. If something besmear the moyra then it speak the moyra. The moyra is not radiating.", "logic": "\nUnfretted(willow)\nRadiating(willow)\nBesmear(willow, moyra)\nBesmear(willow, rhea)\nManicure(willow, moyra)\nManicure(willow, rhea)\nFantastic(moyra)\nXenogeneic(moyra)\nPestering(moyra)\nBesmear(moyra, willow)\nManicure(moyra, willow)\nFantastic(rhea)\nBesmear(rhea, willow)\nBesmear(rhea, moyra)\nManicure(rhea, moyra)\nManicure(rhea, willow) -> Speak(willow, rhea)\nforall x (Manicure(x, moyra) -> Radiating(x))\nRadiating(moyra) and Pestering(moyra) -> Manicure(moyra, willow)\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Besmear(x, moyra) -> Manicure(x, willow))\nforall x (Radiating(x) and Speak(x, moyra) -> Manicure(x, rhea))\nforall x (Besmear(x, moyra) -> Speak(x, moyra))\n\nnot Radiating(moyra)\n\nforall x (Manicure(x, moyra) -> Radiating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The jolee is peremptory. The jolee is muscovite. The jolee outpace the clark. The jolee outpace the marsh. The jolee canter the clark. The jolee canter the marsh. The clark is nigh. The clark is taloned. The clark is exogenous. The clark outpace the jolee. The clark canter the jolee. The marsh is nigh. The marsh outpace the jolee. The marsh outpace the clark. The marsh canter the clark. If the marsh canter the jolee then the jolee resize the marsh. If something canter the clark then it is muscovite. If the clark is muscovite and the clark is exogenous then the clark canter the jolee. If something is muscovite and it outpace the clark then it canter the jolee. If something is muscovite and it resize the clark then it canter the marsh. If something outpace the clark then it resize the clark. The marsh is peremptory.", "logic": "\nPeremptory(jolee)\nMuscovite(jolee)\nOutpace(jolee, clark)\nOutpace(jolee, marsh)\nCanter(jolee, clark)\nCanter(jolee, marsh)\nNigh(clark)\nTaloned(clark)\nExogenous(clark)\nOutpace(clark, jolee)\nCanter(clark, jolee)\nNigh(marsh)\nOutpace(marsh, jolee)\nOutpace(marsh, clark)\nCanter(marsh, clark)\nCanter(marsh, jolee) -> Resize(jolee, marsh)\nforall x (Canter(x, clark) -> Muscovite(x))\nMuscovite(clark) and Exogenous(clark) -> Canter(clark, jolee)\nforall x (Muscovite(x) and Outpace(x, clark) -> Canter(x, jolee))\nforall x (Muscovite(x) and Resize(x, clark) -> Canter(x, marsh))\nforall x (Outpace(x, clark) -> Resize(x, clark))\n\nPeremptory(marsh)\n\nPeremptory(marsh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The sabina is bankrupt. The sabina is horary. The sabina globalize the jed. The sabina globalize the lil. The sabina inter the jed. The sabina inter the lil. The jed is popliteal. The jed is detachable. The jed is forficate. The jed globalize the sabina. The jed inter the sabina. The lil is popliteal. The lil globalize the sabina. The lil globalize the jed. The lil inter the jed. If the lil inter the sabina then the sabina shoo the lil. If something inter the jed then it is horary. If the jed is horary and the jed is forficate then the jed inter the sabina. If something is horary and it globalize the jed then it inter the sabina. If something is horary and it shoo the jed then it inter the lil. If something globalize the jed then it shoo the jed. The sabina is not detachable.", "logic": "\nBankrupt(sabina)\nHorary(sabina)\nGlobalize(sabina, jed)\nGlobalize(sabina, lil)\nInter(sabina, jed)\nInter(sabina, lil)\nPopliteal(jed)\nDetachable(jed)\nForficate(jed)\nGlobalize(jed, sabina)\nInter(jed, sabina)\nPopliteal(lil)\nGlobalize(lil, sabina)\nGlobalize(lil, jed)\nInter(lil, jed)\nInter(lil, sabina) -> Shoo(sabina, lil)\nforall x (Inter(x, jed) -> Horary(x))\nHorary(jed) and Forficate(jed) -> Inter(jed, sabina)\nforall x (Horary(x) and Globalize(x, jed) -> Inter(x, sabina))\nforall x (Horary(x) and Shoo(x, jed) -> Inter(x, lil))\nforall x (Globalize(x, jed) -> Shoo(x, jed))\n\nnot Detachable(sabina)\n\nnot Detachable(sabina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The rozamond is sapphic. The rozamond is exsanguine. The rozamond shrink the hyman. The rozamond shrink the melisent. The rozamond display the hyman. The rozamond display the melisent. The hyman is bedfast. The hyman is carnation. The hyman is promotive. The hyman shrink the rozamond. The hyman display the rozamond. The melisent is bedfast. The melisent shrink the rozamond. The melisent shrink the hyman. The melisent display the hyman. If the melisent display the rozamond then the rozamond patrol the melisent. If something display the hyman then it is exsanguine. If the hyman is exsanguine and the hyman is promotive then the hyman display the rozamond. If something is exsanguine and it shrink the hyman then it display the rozamond. If something is exsanguine and it patrol the hyman then it display the melisent. If something shrink the hyman then it patrol the hyman. The melisent patrol the rozamond.", "logic": "\nSapphic(rozamond)\nExsanguine(rozamond)\nShrink(rozamond, hyman)\nShrink(rozamond, melisent)\nDisplay(rozamond, hyman)\nDisplay(rozamond, melisent)\nBedfast(hyman)\nCarnation(hyman)\nPromotive(hyman)\nShrink(hyman, rozamond)\nDisplay(hyman, rozamond)\nBedfast(melisent)\nShrink(melisent, rozamond)\nShrink(melisent, hyman)\nDisplay(melisent, hyman)\nDisplay(melisent, rozamond) -> Patrol(rozamond, melisent)\nforall x (Display(x, hyman) -> Exsanguine(x))\nExsanguine(hyman) and Promotive(hyman) -> Display(hyman, rozamond)\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Shrink(x, hyman) -> Display(x, rozamond))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) and Patrol(x, hyman) -> Display(x, melisent))\nforall x (Shrink(x, hyman) -> Patrol(x, hyman))\n\nPatrol(melisent, rozamond)\n\nPatrol(melisent, rozamond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The wat is cumuliform. The wat is flameproof. The wat creolize the zuzana. The wat creolize the xerxes. The wat neuter the zuzana. The wat neuter the xerxes. The zuzana is snuffling. The zuzana is unwell. The zuzana is rationed. The zuzana creolize the wat. The zuzana neuter the wat. The xerxes is snuffling. The xerxes creolize the wat. The xerxes creolize the zuzana. The xerxes neuter the zuzana. If the xerxes neuter the wat then the wat blunder the xerxes. If something neuter the zuzana then it is flameproof. If the zuzana is flameproof and the zuzana is rationed then the zuzana neuter the wat. If something is flameproof and it creolize the zuzana then it neuter the wat. If something is flameproof and it blunder the zuzana then it neuter the xerxes. If something creolize the zuzana then it blunder the zuzana. The zuzana does not need the xerxes.", "logic": "\nCumuliform(wat)\nFlameproof(wat)\nCreolize(wat, zuzana)\nCreolize(wat, xerxes)\nNeuter(wat, zuzana)\nNeuter(wat, xerxes)\nSnuffling(zuzana)\nUnwell(zuzana)\nRationed(zuzana)\nCreolize(zuzana, wat)\nNeuter(zuzana, wat)\nSnuffling(xerxes)\nCreolize(xerxes, wat)\nCreolize(xerxes, zuzana)\nNeuter(xerxes, zuzana)\nNeuter(xerxes, wat) -> Blunder(wat, xerxes)\nforall x (Neuter(x, zuzana) -> Flameproof(x))\nFlameproof(zuzana) and Rationed(zuzana) -> Neuter(zuzana, wat)\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Creolize(x, zuzana) -> Neuter(x, wat))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and Blunder(x, zuzana) -> Neuter(x, xerxes))\nforall x (Creolize(x, zuzana) -> Blunder(x, zuzana))\n\nnot Creolize(zuzana, xerxes)\n\nnot Creolize(zuzana, xerxes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The batsheva is stomachal. The batsheva is twopenny. The batsheva saunter the hartwell. The batsheva saunter the odilia. The batsheva befoul the hartwell. The batsheva befoul the odilia. The hartwell is volant. The hartwell is wonky. The hartwell is snappy. The hartwell saunter the batsheva. The hartwell befoul the batsheva. The odilia is volant. The odilia saunter the batsheva. The odilia saunter the hartwell. The odilia befoul the hartwell. If the odilia befoul the batsheva then the batsheva outmode the odilia. If something befoul the hartwell then it is twopenny. If the hartwell is twopenny and the hartwell is snappy then the hartwell befoul the batsheva. If something is twopenny and it saunter the hartwell then it befoul the batsheva. If something is twopenny and it outmode the hartwell then it befoul the odilia. If something saunter the hartwell then it outmode the hartwell. The odilia is wonky.", "logic": "\nStomachal(batsheva)\nTwopenny(batsheva)\nSaunter(batsheva, hartwell)\nSaunter(batsheva, odilia)\nBefoul(batsheva, hartwell)\nBefoul(batsheva, odilia)\nVolant(hartwell)\nWonky(hartwell)\nSnappy(hartwell)\nSaunter(hartwell, batsheva)\nBefoul(hartwell, batsheva)\nVolant(odilia)\nSaunter(odilia, batsheva)\nSaunter(odilia, hartwell)\nBefoul(odilia, hartwell)\nBefoul(odilia, batsheva) -> Outmode(batsheva, odilia)\nforall x (Befoul(x, hartwell) -> Twopenny(x))\nTwopenny(hartwell) and Snappy(hartwell) -> Befoul(hartwell, batsheva)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Saunter(x, hartwell) -> Befoul(x, batsheva))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Outmode(x, hartwell) -> Befoul(x, odilia))\nforall x (Saunter(x, hartwell) -> Outmode(x, hartwell))\n\nWonky(odilia)\n\nWonky(odilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-245"} {"premises": "The gabbie extenuate the glori. The glori mussitate the milissent. The milissent extenuate the glori. All cannibalic people are lumpish. If the gabbie extenuate the glori then the gabbie extenuate the milissent. If someone drawl the gabbie then the gabbie mussitate the milissent. If someone mussitate the milissent then they eat the gabbie. If someone is cherubic then they are snazzy. If someone mussitate the glori and the glori does not need the gabbie then the gabbie extenuate the glori. The gabbie extenuate the glori.", "logic": "\nExtenuate(gabbie, glori)\nMussitate(glori, milissent)\nExtenuate(milissent, glori)\nforall x (Cannibalic(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nExtenuate(gabbie, glori) -> Extenuate(gabbie, milissent)\nforall x (Drawl(x, gabbie) -> Mussitate(gabbie, milissent))\nforall x (Mussitate(x, milissent) -> Drawl(x, gabbie))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) -> Snazzy(x))\nforall x (Mussitate(x, glori) and not Extenuate(glori, gabbie) -> Extenuate(gabbie, glori))\n\nExtenuate(gabbie, glori)\n\ntherefore Extenuate(gabbie, glori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The valerie malign the silvia. The silvia decline the silvain. The silvain malign the silvia. All loveable people are prakritic. If the valerie malign the silvia then the valerie malign the silvain. If someone enfeoff the valerie then the valerie decline the silvain. If someone decline the silvain then they eat the valerie. If someone is subacute then they are teachable. If someone decline the silvia and the silvia does not need the valerie then the valerie malign the silvia. The silvia does not visit the silvain.", "logic": "\nMalign(valerie, silvia)\nDecline(silvia, silvain)\nMalign(silvain, silvia)\nforall x (Loveable(x) -> Prakritic(x))\nMalign(valerie, silvia) -> Malign(valerie, silvain)\nforall x (Enfeoff(x, valerie) -> Decline(valerie, silvain))\nforall x (Decline(x, silvain) -> Enfeoff(x, valerie))\nforall x (Subacute(x) -> Teachable(x))\nforall x (Decline(x, silvia) and not Malign(silvia, valerie) -> Malign(valerie, silvia))\n\nnot Decline(silvia, silvain)\n\ntherefore Decline(silvia, silvain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The sib wamble the trever. The trever shampoo the dedie. The dedie wamble the trever. All negro people are aspherical. If the sib wamble the trever then the sib wamble the dedie. If someone encamp the sib then the sib shampoo the dedie. If someone shampoo the dedie then they eat the sib. If someone is coaxal then they are bacchantic. If someone shampoo the trever and the trever does not need the sib then the sib wamble the trever. The sib wamble the dedie.", "logic": "\nWamble(sib, trever)\nShampoo(trever, dedie)\nWamble(dedie, trever)\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Aspherical(x))\nWamble(sib, trever) -> Wamble(sib, dedie)\nforall x (Encamp(x, sib) -> Shampoo(sib, dedie))\nforall x (Shampoo(x, dedie) -> Encamp(x, sib))\nforall x (Coaxal(x) -> Bacchantic(x))\nforall x (Shampoo(x, trever) and not Wamble(trever, sib) -> Wamble(sib, trever))\n\nWamble(sib, dedie)\n\nWamble(sib, trever) and Wamble(sib, trever) -> Wamble(sib, dedie) -> therefore Wamble(sib, dedie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The adolph grouse the margot. The margot ballyhoo the adrianna. The adrianna grouse the margot. All patched people are biserrate. If the adolph grouse the margot then the adolph grouse the adrianna. If someone stir the adolph then the adolph ballyhoo the adrianna. If someone ballyhoo the adrianna then they eat the adolph. If someone is maimed then they are poriferous. If someone ballyhoo the margot and the margot does not need the adolph then the adolph grouse the margot. The margot does not eat the adolph.", "logic": "\nGrouse(adolph, margot)\nBallyhoo(margot, adrianna)\nGrouse(adrianna, margot)\nforall x (Patched(x) -> Biserrate(x))\nGrouse(adolph, margot) -> Grouse(adolph, adrianna)\nforall x (Stir(x, adolph) -> Ballyhoo(adolph, adrianna))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, adrianna) -> Stir(x, adolph))\nforall x (Maimed(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nforall x (Ballyhoo(x, margot) and not Grouse(margot, adolph) -> Grouse(adolph, margot))\n\nnot Stir(margot, adolph)\n\nBallyhoo(margot, adrianna) and forall x (Ballyhoo(x, adrianna) -> Stir(x, adolph)) -> therefore Stir(margot, adolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The kip swag the charyl. The charyl brisken the paola. The paola swag the charyl. All activated people are insincere. If the kip swag the charyl then the kip swag the paola. If someone alert the kip then the kip brisken the paola. If someone brisken the paola then they eat the kip. If someone is appointive then they are autogamic. If someone brisken the charyl and the charyl does not need the kip then the kip swag the charyl. The kip brisken the paola.", "logic": "\nSwag(kip, charyl)\nBrisken(charyl, paola)\nSwag(paola, charyl)\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Insincere(x))\nSwag(kip, charyl) -> Swag(kip, paola)\nforall x (Alert(x, kip) -> Brisken(kip, paola))\nforall x (Brisken(x, paola) -> Alert(x, kip))\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Autogamic(x))\nforall x (Brisken(x, charyl) and not Swag(charyl, kip) -> Swag(kip, charyl))\n\nBrisken(kip, paola)\n\nBrisken(charyl, paola) and forall x (Brisken(x, paola) -> Alert(x, kip)) -> therefore Alert(charyl, kip) Alert(charyl, kip) and forall x (Alert(x, kip) -> Brisken(kip, paola)) -> therefore Brisken(kip, paola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The stephana fold the vilma. The vilma channelize the benson. The benson fold the vilma. All coaxal people are vendible. If the stephana fold the vilma then the stephana fold the benson. If someone compound the stephana then the stephana channelize the benson. If someone channelize the benson then they eat the stephana. If someone is syrupy then they are callous. If someone channelize the vilma and the vilma does not need the stephana then the stephana fold the vilma. The stephana does not visit the benson.", "logic": "\nFold(stephana, vilma)\nChannelize(vilma, benson)\nFold(benson, vilma)\nforall x (Coaxal(x) -> Vendible(x))\nFold(stephana, vilma) -> Fold(stephana, benson)\nforall x (Compound(x, stephana) -> Channelize(stephana, benson))\nforall x (Channelize(x, benson) -> Compound(x, stephana))\nforall x (Syrupy(x) -> Callous(x))\nforall x (Channelize(x, vilma) and not Fold(vilma, stephana) -> Fold(stephana, vilma))\n\nnot Channelize(stephana, benson)\n\nChannelize(vilma, benson) and forall x (Channelize(x, benson) -> Compound(x, stephana)) -> therefore Compound(vilma, stephana) Compound(vilma, stephana) and forall x (Compound(x, stephana) -> Channelize(stephana, benson)) -> therefore Channelize(stephana, benson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The sollie spearhead the maxwell. The maxwell symmetrize the dougie. The dougie spearhead the maxwell. All reflecting people are parhelic. If the sollie spearhead the maxwell then the sollie spearhead the dougie. If someone conge the sollie then the sollie symmetrize the dougie. If someone symmetrize the dougie then they eat the sollie. If someone is wearying then they are commensal. If someone symmetrize the maxwell and the maxwell does not need the sollie then the sollie spearhead the maxwell. The sollie conge the sollie.", "logic": "\nSpearhead(sollie, maxwell)\nSymmetrize(maxwell, dougie)\nSpearhead(dougie, maxwell)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Parhelic(x))\nSpearhead(sollie, maxwell) -> Spearhead(sollie, dougie)\nforall x (Conge(x, sollie) -> Symmetrize(sollie, dougie))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, dougie) -> Conge(x, sollie))\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Commensal(x))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, maxwell) and not Spearhead(maxwell, sollie) -> Spearhead(sollie, maxwell))\n\nConge(sollie, sollie)\n\nSymmetrize(maxwell, dougie) and forall x (Symmetrize(x, dougie) -> Conge(x, sollie)) -> therefore Conge(maxwell, sollie) Conge(maxwell, sollie) and forall x (Conge(x, sollie) -> Symmetrize(sollie, dougie)) -> therefore Symmetrize(sollie, dougie) Symmetrize(sollie, dougie) and forall x (Symmetrize(x, dougie) -> Conge(x, sollie)) -> therefore Conge(sollie, sollie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The carlie minstrel the palmer. The palmer cake the trev. The trev minstrel the palmer. All coreferent people are obedient. If the carlie minstrel the palmer then the carlie minstrel the trev. If someone lead the carlie then the carlie cake the trev. If someone cake the trev then they eat the carlie. If someone is exonerated then they are tributary. If someone cake the palmer and the palmer does not need the carlie then the carlie minstrel the palmer. The carlie does not eat the carlie.", "logic": "\nMinstrel(carlie, palmer)\nCake(palmer, trev)\nMinstrel(trev, palmer)\nforall x (Coreferent(x) -> Obedient(x))\nMinstrel(carlie, palmer) -> Minstrel(carlie, trev)\nforall x (Lead(x, carlie) -> Cake(carlie, trev))\nforall x (Cake(x, trev) -> Lead(x, carlie))\nforall x (Exonerated(x) -> Tributary(x))\nforall x (Cake(x, palmer) and not Minstrel(palmer, carlie) -> Minstrel(carlie, palmer))\n\nnot Lead(carlie, carlie)\n\nCake(palmer, trev) and forall x (Cake(x, trev) -> Lead(x, carlie)) -> therefore Lead(palmer, carlie) Lead(palmer, carlie) and forall x (Lead(x, carlie) -> Cake(carlie, trev)) -> therefore Cake(carlie, trev) Cake(carlie, trev) and forall x (Cake(x, trev) -> Lead(x, carlie)) -> therefore Lead(carlie, carlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The henrietta maintain the alford. The alford seed the sky. The sky maintain the alford. All aliform people are rejective. If the henrietta maintain the alford then the henrietta maintain the sky. If someone reschedule the henrietta then the henrietta seed the sky. If someone seed the sky then they eat the henrietta. If someone is uppity then they are nonmetal. If someone seed the alford and the alford does not need the henrietta then the henrietta maintain the alford. The henrietta is not rejective.", "logic": "\nMaintain(henrietta, alford)\nSeed(alford, sky)\nMaintain(sky, alford)\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Rejective(x))\nMaintain(henrietta, alford) -> Maintain(henrietta, sky)\nforall x (Reschedule(x, henrietta) -> Seed(henrietta, sky))\nforall x (Seed(x, sky) -> Reschedule(x, henrietta))\nforall x (Uppity(x) -> Nonmetal(x))\nforall x (Seed(x, alford) and not Maintain(alford, henrietta) -> Maintain(henrietta, alford))\n\nnot Rejective(henrietta)\n\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Rejective(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The gardiner cover the carlina. The carlina diet the lorrayne. The lorrayne cover the carlina. All pretend people are skilful. If the gardiner cover the carlina then the gardiner cover the lorrayne. If someone glimpse the gardiner then the gardiner diet the lorrayne. If someone diet the lorrayne then they eat the gardiner. If someone is stagy then they are seeable. If someone diet the carlina and the carlina does not need the gardiner then the gardiner cover the carlina. The lorrayne is seeable.", "logic": "\nCover(gardiner, carlina)\nDiet(carlina, lorrayne)\nCover(lorrayne, carlina)\nforall x (Pretend(x) -> Skilful(x))\nCover(gardiner, carlina) -> Cover(gardiner, lorrayne)\nforall x (Glimpse(x, gardiner) -> Diet(gardiner, lorrayne))\nforall x (Diet(x, lorrayne) -> Glimpse(x, gardiner))\nforall x (Stagy(x) -> Seeable(x))\nforall x (Diet(x, carlina) and not Cover(carlina, gardiner) -> Cover(gardiner, carlina))\n\nSeeable(lorrayne)\n\nforall x (Stagy(x) -> Seeable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The karina mist the barton. The barton border the sully. The sully mist the barton. All vocative people are laughable. If the karina mist the barton then the karina mist the sully. If someone honey the karina then the karina border the sully. If someone border the sully then they eat the karina. If someone is nodulose then they are skinned. If someone border the barton and the barton does not need the karina then the karina mist the barton. The barton is not skinned.", "logic": "\nMist(karina, barton)\nBorder(barton, sully)\nMist(sully, barton)\nforall x (Vocative(x) -> Laughable(x))\nMist(karina, barton) -> Mist(karina, sully)\nforall x (Honey(x, karina) -> Border(karina, sully))\nforall x (Border(x, sully) -> Honey(x, karina))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Skinned(x))\nforall x (Border(x, barton) and not Mist(barton, karina) -> Mist(karina, barton))\n\nnot Skinned(barton)\n\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Skinned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The oral coerce the deanne. The deanne mollify the briny. The briny coerce the deanne. All tattered people are lucifugal. If the oral coerce the deanne then the oral coerce the briny. If someone potentiate the oral then the oral mollify the briny. If someone mollify the briny then they eat the oral. If someone is arenaceous then they are stainable. If someone mollify the deanne and the deanne does not need the oral then the oral coerce the deanne. The deanne is lucifugal.", "logic": "\nCoerce(oral, deanne)\nMollify(deanne, briny)\nCoerce(briny, deanne)\nforall x (Tattered(x) -> Lucifugal(x))\nCoerce(oral, deanne) -> Coerce(oral, briny)\nforall x (Potentiate(x, oral) -> Mollify(oral, briny))\nforall x (Mollify(x, briny) -> Potentiate(x, oral))\nforall x (Arenaceous(x) -> Stainable(x))\nforall x (Mollify(x, deanne) and not Coerce(deanne, oral) -> Coerce(oral, deanne))\n\nLucifugal(deanne)\n\nforall x (Tattered(x) -> Lucifugal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The leonardo consist the jethro. The jethro expose the aimil. The aimil consist the jethro. All negro people are logistical. If the leonardo consist the jethro then the leonardo consist the aimil. If someone enquire the leonardo then the leonardo expose the aimil. If someone expose the aimil then they eat the leonardo. If someone is organised then they are unthawed. If someone expose the jethro and the jethro does not need the leonardo then the leonardo consist the jethro. The jethro does not need the jethro.", "logic": "\nConsist(leonardo, jethro)\nExpose(jethro, aimil)\nConsist(aimil, jethro)\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Logistical(x))\nConsist(leonardo, jethro) -> Consist(leonardo, aimil)\nforall x (Enquire(x, leonardo) -> Expose(leonardo, aimil))\nforall x (Expose(x, aimil) -> Enquire(x, leonardo))\nforall x (Organised(x) -> Unthawed(x))\nforall x (Expose(x, jethro) and not Consist(jethro, leonardo) -> Consist(leonardo, jethro))\n\nnot Consist(jethro, jethro)\n\nnot Consist(jethro, jethro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The lotte syncretise the krystalle. The krystalle pollard the delores. The delores syncretise the krystalle. All levorotary people are unimpaired. If the lotte syncretise the krystalle then the lotte syncretise the delores. If someone tether the lotte then the lotte pollard the delores. If someone pollard the delores then they eat the lotte. If someone is soapy then they are boney. If someone pollard the krystalle and the krystalle does not need the lotte then the lotte syncretise the krystalle. The krystalle tether the delores.", "logic": "\nSyncretise(lotte, krystalle)\nPollard(krystalle, delores)\nSyncretise(delores, krystalle)\nforall x (Levorotary(x) -> Unimpaired(x))\nSyncretise(lotte, krystalle) -> Syncretise(lotte, delores)\nforall x (Tether(x, lotte) -> Pollard(lotte, delores))\nforall x (Pollard(x, delores) -> Tether(x, lotte))\nforall x (Soapy(x) -> Boney(x))\nforall x (Pollard(x, krystalle) and not Syncretise(krystalle, lotte) -> Syncretise(lotte, krystalle))\n\nTether(krystalle, delores)\n\nTether(krystalle, delores) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The roderick extradite the abram. The abram fowl the vern. The vern extradite the abram. All ciliary people are inquiring. If the roderick extradite the abram then the roderick extradite the vern. If someone curvet the roderick then the roderick fowl the vern. If someone fowl the vern then they eat the roderick. If someone is nonpolar then they are sappy. If someone fowl the abram and the abram does not need the roderick then the roderick extradite the abram. The abram is not nonpolar.", "logic": "\nExtradite(roderick, abram)\nFowl(abram, vern)\nExtradite(vern, abram)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) -> Inquiring(x))\nExtradite(roderick, abram) -> Extradite(roderick, vern)\nforall x (Curvet(x, roderick) -> Fowl(roderick, vern))\nforall x (Fowl(x, vern) -> Curvet(x, roderick))\nforall x (Nonpolar(x) -> Sappy(x))\nforall x (Fowl(x, abram) and not Extradite(abram, roderick) -> Extradite(roderick, abram))\n\nnot Nonpolar(abram)\n\nnot Nonpolar(abram) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "The andria contest the briggs. The briggs cough the bonita. The bonita contest the briggs. All opencast people are barometric. If the andria contest the briggs then the andria contest the bonita. If someone wilt the andria then the andria cough the bonita. If someone cough the bonita then they eat the andria. If someone is underslung then they are infeasible. If someone cough the briggs and the briggs does not need the andria then the andria contest the briggs. The andria is rough.", "logic": "\nContest(andria, briggs)\nCough(briggs, bonita)\nContest(bonita, briggs)\nforall x (Opencast(x) -> Barometric(x))\nContest(andria, briggs) -> Contest(andria, bonita)\nforall x (Wilt(x, andria) -> Cough(andria, bonita))\nforall x (Cough(x, bonita) -> Wilt(x, andria))\nforall x (Underslung(x) -> Infeasible(x))\nforall x (Cough(x, briggs) and not Contest(briggs, andria) -> Contest(andria, briggs))\n\nRough(andria)\n\nRough(andria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-697"} {"premises": "Gertrude is blanket. If someone is fourteen then they are not pouched. If Gertrude is blanket and Gertrude is pouched then Gertrude is metatarsal. All metatarsal people are blanket. All noncausal people are thundery. Round, metatarsal people are not fourteen. If someone is thundery then they are not metatarsal. If someone is blanket then they are noncausal. All metatarsal people are spectacled. Gertrude is blanket.", "logic": "\nBlanket(gertrude)\nforall x (Fourteen(x) -> not Pouched(x))\nBlanket(gertrude) and Pouched(gertrude) -> Metatarsal(gertrude)\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) -> Blanket(x))\nforall x (Noncausal(x) -> Thundery(x))\nforall x (Spectacled(x) and Metatarsal(x) -> not Fourteen(x))\nforall x (Thundery(x) -> not Metatarsal(x))\nforall x (Blanket(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) -> Spectacled(x))\n\nBlanket(gertrude)\n\ntherefore Blanket(gertrude)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Brandie is currish. If someone is shivery then they are not boneheaded. If Brandie is currish and Brandie is boneheaded then Brandie is vicinal. All vicinal people are currish. All finicky people are arthralgic. Round, vicinal people are not shivery. If someone is arthralgic then they are not vicinal. If someone is currish then they are finicky. All vicinal people are willful. Brandie is not currish.", "logic": "\nCurrish(brandie)\nforall x (Shivery(x) -> not Boneheaded(x))\nCurrish(brandie) and Boneheaded(brandie) -> Vicinal(brandie)\nforall x (Vicinal(x) -> Currish(x))\nforall x (Finicky(x) -> Arthralgic(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) and Vicinal(x) -> not Shivery(x))\nforall x (Arthralgic(x) -> not Vicinal(x))\nforall x (Currish(x) -> Finicky(x))\nforall x (Vicinal(x) -> Willful(x))\n\nnot Currish(brandie)\n\ntherefore Currish(brandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Clarice is scalic. If someone is unneurotic then they are not reasoned. If Clarice is scalic and Clarice is reasoned then Clarice is anoxemic. All anoxemic people are scalic. All juicy people are regulation. Round, anoxemic people are not unneurotic. If someone is regulation then they are not anoxemic. If someone is scalic then they are juicy. All anoxemic people are loamless. Clarice is juicy.", "logic": "\nScalic(clarice)\nforall x (Unneurotic(x) -> not Reasoned(x))\nScalic(clarice) and Reasoned(clarice) -> Anoxemic(clarice)\nforall x (Anoxemic(x) -> Scalic(x))\nforall x (Juicy(x) -> Regulation(x))\nforall x (Loamless(x) and Anoxemic(x) -> not Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> not Anoxemic(x))\nforall x (Scalic(x) -> Juicy(x))\nforall x (Anoxemic(x) -> Loamless(x))\n\nJuicy(clarice)\n\nScalic(clarice) and forall x (Scalic(x) -> Juicy(x)) -> therefore Juicy(clarice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Zarla is occipital. If someone is unifoliate then they are not stainless. If Zarla is occipital and Zarla is stainless then Zarla is imaginable. All imaginable people are occipital. All autocratic people are beardless. Round, imaginable people are not unifoliate. If someone is beardless then they are not imaginable. If someone is occipital then they are autocratic. All imaginable people are entire. Zarla is not autocratic.", "logic": "\nOccipital(zarla)\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> not Stainless(x))\nOccipital(zarla) and Stainless(zarla) -> Imaginable(zarla)\nforall x (Imaginable(x) -> Occipital(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) -> Beardless(x))\nforall x (Entire(x) and Imaginable(x) -> not Unifoliate(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> not Imaginable(x))\nforall x (Occipital(x) -> Autocratic(x))\nforall x (Imaginable(x) -> Entire(x))\n\nnot Autocratic(zarla)\n\nOccipital(zarla) and forall x (Occipital(x) -> Autocratic(x)) -> therefore Autocratic(zarla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Trixy is buffoonish. If someone is monogenic then they are not collegial. If Trixy is buffoonish and Trixy is collegial then Trixy is transitory. All transitory people are buffoonish. All freelance people are arbitrable. Round, transitory people are not monogenic. If someone is arbitrable then they are not transitory. If someone is buffoonish then they are freelance. All transitory people are sagittal. Trixy is arbitrable.", "logic": "\nBuffoonish(trixy)\nforall x (Monogenic(x) -> not Collegial(x))\nBuffoonish(trixy) and Collegial(trixy) -> Transitory(trixy)\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Buffoonish(x))\nforall x (Freelance(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Sagittal(x) and Transitory(x) -> not Monogenic(x))\nforall x (Arbitrable(x) -> not Transitory(x))\nforall x (Buffoonish(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Sagittal(x))\n\nArbitrable(trixy)\n\nBuffoonish(trixy) and forall x (Buffoonish(x) -> Freelance(x)) -> therefore Freelance(trixy) Freelance(trixy) and forall x (Freelance(x) -> Arbitrable(x)) -> therefore Arbitrable(trixy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Shana is crabbed. If someone is bellied then they are not grumous. If Shana is crabbed and Shana is grumous then Shana is amaurotic. All amaurotic people are crabbed. All sharp people are unlettered. Round, amaurotic people are not bellied. If someone is unlettered then they are not amaurotic. If someone is crabbed then they are sharp. All amaurotic people are imperative. Shana is not unlettered.", "logic": "\nCrabbed(shana)\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> not Grumous(x))\nCrabbed(shana) and Grumous(shana) -> Amaurotic(shana)\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) -> Crabbed(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Unlettered(x))\nforall x (Imperative(x) and Amaurotic(x) -> not Bellied(x))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) -> not Amaurotic(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) -> Imperative(x))\n\nnot Unlettered(shana)\n\nCrabbed(shana) and forall x (Crabbed(x) -> Sharp(x)) -> therefore Sharp(shana) Sharp(shana) and forall x (Sharp(x) -> Unlettered(x)) -> therefore Unlettered(shana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Enrika is wavering. If someone is manichaean then they are not chirpy. If Enrika is wavering and Enrika is chirpy then Enrika is undesired. All undesired people are wavering. All champleve people are dietary. Round, undesired people are not manichaean. If someone is dietary then they are not undesired. If someone is wavering then they are champleve. All undesired people are bondable. Enrika is not undesired.", "logic": "\nWavering(enrika)\nforall x (Manichaean(x) -> not Chirpy(x))\nWavering(enrika) and Chirpy(enrika) -> Undesired(enrika)\nforall x (Undesired(x) -> Wavering(x))\nforall x (Champleve(x) -> Dietary(x))\nforall x (Bondable(x) and Undesired(x) -> not Manichaean(x))\nforall x (Dietary(x) -> not Undesired(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Champleve(x))\nforall x (Undesired(x) -> Bondable(x))\n\nnot Undesired(enrika)\n\nWavering(enrika) and forall x (Wavering(x) -> Champleve(x)) -> therefore Champleve(enrika) Champleve(enrika) and forall x (Champleve(x) -> Dietary(x)) -> therefore Dietary(enrika) Dietary(enrika) and forall x (Dietary(x) -> not Undesired(x)) -> therefore not Undesired(enrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Minda is phonologic. If someone is admissible then they are not decadent. If Minda is phonologic and Minda is decadent then Minda is unoriented. All unoriented people are phonologic. All stomatous people are shimmery. Round, unoriented people are not admissible. If someone is shimmery then they are not unoriented. If someone is phonologic then they are stomatous. All unoriented people are prosodic. Minda is unoriented.", "logic": "\nPhonologic(minda)\nforall x (Admissible(x) -> not Decadent(x))\nPhonologic(minda) and Decadent(minda) -> Unoriented(minda)\nforall x (Unoriented(x) -> Phonologic(x))\nforall x (Stomatous(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Prosodic(x) and Unoriented(x) -> not Admissible(x))\nforall x (Shimmery(x) -> not Unoriented(x))\nforall x (Phonologic(x) -> Stomatous(x))\nforall x (Unoriented(x) -> Prosodic(x))\n\nUnoriented(minda)\n\nPhonologic(minda) and forall x (Phonologic(x) -> Stomatous(x)) -> therefore Stomatous(minda) Stomatous(minda) and forall x (Stomatous(x) -> Shimmery(x)) -> therefore Shimmery(minda) Shimmery(minda) and forall x (Shimmery(x) -> not Unoriented(x)) -> therefore not Unoriented(minda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Douglass is dyed. If someone is cumulative then they are not oriental. If Douglass is dyed and Douglass is oriental then Douglass is autarchic. All autarchic people are dyed. All jittering people are renowned. Round, autarchic people are not cumulative. If someone is renowned then they are not autarchic. If someone is dyed then they are jittering. All autarchic people are catalytic. Douglass is not catalytic.", "logic": "\nDyed(douglass)\nforall x (Cumulative(x) -> not Oriental(x))\nDyed(douglass) and Oriental(douglass) -> Autarchic(douglass)\nforall x (Autarchic(x) -> Dyed(x))\nforall x (Jittering(x) -> Renowned(x))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) and Autarchic(x) -> not Cumulative(x))\nforall x (Renowned(x) -> not Autarchic(x))\nforall x (Dyed(x) -> Jittering(x))\nforall x (Autarchic(x) -> Catalytic(x))\n\nnot Catalytic(douglass)\n\nforall x (Autarchic(x) -> Catalytic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Tonnie is accoutred. If someone is apteral then they are not leftish. If Tonnie is accoutred and Tonnie is leftish then Tonnie is amorphous. All amorphous people are accoutred. All unpictured people are countless. Round, amorphous people are not apteral. If someone is countless then they are not amorphous. If someone is accoutred then they are unpictured. All amorphous people are prohibited. Tonnie is apteral.", "logic": "\nAccoutred(tonnie)\nforall x (Apteral(x) -> not Leftish(x))\nAccoutred(tonnie) and Leftish(tonnie) -> Amorphous(tonnie)\nforall x (Amorphous(x) -> Accoutred(x))\nforall x (Unpictured(x) -> Countless(x))\nforall x (Prohibited(x) and Amorphous(x) -> not Apteral(x))\nforall x (Countless(x) -> not Amorphous(x))\nforall x (Accoutred(x) -> Unpictured(x))\nforall x (Amorphous(x) -> Prohibited(x))\n\nApteral(tonnie)\n\nApteral(tonnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-714"} {"premises": "Gilles is foxy. Glynis is foxy. Puff is mottled. If something is frontal then it is apiculate. All apiculate things are frontal. If something is frontal then it is mousy. All mousy, foxy things are debased. All mottled things are frontal. Green things are foxy. If Glynis is ulcerated and Glynis is mottled then Glynis is debased. If something is mottled and mousy then it is frontal. Puff is mottled.", "logic": "\nFoxy(gilles)\nFoxy(glynis)\nMottled(puff)\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Apiculate(x) -> Frontal(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> Mousy(x))\nforall x (Mousy(x) and Foxy(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Mottled(x) -> Frontal(x))\nforall x (Apiculate(x) -> Foxy(x))\nUlcerated(glynis) and Mottled(glynis) -> Debased(glynis)\nforall x (Mottled(x) and Mousy(x) -> Frontal(x))\n\nMottled(puff)\n\ntherefore Mottled(puff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Larry is chilean. Fara is chilean. Berkie is aneroid. If something is braky then it is abroach. All abroach things are braky. If something is braky then it is homely. All homely, chilean things are acherontic. All aneroid things are braky. Green things are chilean. If Fara is cuticular and Fara is aneroid then Fara is acherontic. If something is aneroid and homely then it is braky. Berkie is not aneroid.", "logic": "\nChilean(larry)\nChilean(fara)\nAneroid(berkie)\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Abroach(x))\nforall x (Abroach(x) -> Braky(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) -> Homely(x))\nforall x (Homely(x) and Chilean(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Aneroid(x) -> Braky(x))\nforall x (Abroach(x) -> Chilean(x))\nCuticular(fara) and Aneroid(fara) -> Acherontic(fara)\nforall x (Aneroid(x) and Homely(x) -> Braky(x))\n\nnot Aneroid(berkie)\n\ntherefore Aneroid(berkie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Mayer is coquettish. Manon is coquettish. Aurora is demanding. If something is torturing then it is blotto. All blotto things are torturing. If something is torturing then it is purposeful. All purposeful, coquettish things are numerate. All demanding things are torturing. Green things are coquettish. If Manon is copular and Manon is demanding then Manon is numerate. If something is demanding and purposeful then it is torturing. Aurora is torturing.", "logic": "\nCoquettish(mayer)\nCoquettish(manon)\nDemanding(aurora)\nforall x (Torturing(x) -> Blotto(x))\nforall x (Blotto(x) -> Torturing(x))\nforall x (Torturing(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and Coquettish(x) -> Numerate(x))\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Torturing(x))\nforall x (Blotto(x) -> Coquettish(x))\nCopular(manon) and Demanding(manon) -> Numerate(manon)\nforall x (Demanding(x) and Purposeful(x) -> Torturing(x))\n\nTorturing(aurora)\n\nDemanding(aurora) and forall x (Demanding(x) -> Torturing(x)) -> therefore Torturing(aurora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Emmalyn is unshaped. Kurt is unshaped. Philippe is chilling. If something is sincere then it is cathartic. All cathartic things are sincere. If something is sincere then it is barefoot. All barefoot, unshaped things are future. All chilling things are sincere. Green things are unshaped. If Kurt is harassed and Kurt is chilling then Kurt is future. If something is chilling and barefoot then it is sincere. Philippe is not sincere.", "logic": "\nUnshaped(emmalyn)\nUnshaped(kurt)\nChilling(philippe)\nforall x (Sincere(x) -> Cathartic(x))\nforall x (Cathartic(x) -> Sincere(x))\nforall x (Sincere(x) -> Barefoot(x))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Unshaped(x) -> Future(x))\nforall x (Chilling(x) -> Sincere(x))\nforall x (Cathartic(x) -> Unshaped(x))\nHarassed(kurt) and Chilling(kurt) -> Future(kurt)\nforall x (Chilling(x) and Barefoot(x) -> Sincere(x))\n\nnot Sincere(philippe)\n\nChilling(philippe) and forall x (Chilling(x) -> Sincere(x)) -> therefore Sincere(philippe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Stefanie is gilbertian. Ilyssa is gilbertian. Florenza is bated. If something is bubbly then it is browned. All browned things are bubbly. If something is bubbly then it is unchecked. All unchecked, gilbertian things are principled. All bated things are bubbly. Green things are gilbertian. If Ilyssa is suitable and Ilyssa is bated then Ilyssa is principled. If something is bated and unchecked then it is bubbly. Florenza is unchecked.", "logic": "\nGilbertian(stefanie)\nGilbertian(ilyssa)\nBated(florenza)\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Browned(x))\nforall x (Browned(x) -> Bubbly(x))\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Unchecked(x))\nforall x (Unchecked(x) and Gilbertian(x) -> Principled(x))\nforall x (Bated(x) -> Bubbly(x))\nforall x (Browned(x) -> Gilbertian(x))\nSuitable(ilyssa) and Bated(ilyssa) -> Principled(ilyssa)\nforall x (Bated(x) and Unchecked(x) -> Bubbly(x))\n\nUnchecked(florenza)\n\nBated(florenza) and forall x (Bated(x) -> Bubbly(x)) -> therefore Bubbly(florenza) Bubbly(florenza) and forall x (Bubbly(x) -> Unchecked(x)) -> therefore Unchecked(florenza)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Margo is nautical. Fairfax is nautical. Nancee is stressful. If something is glad then it is nauseous. All nauseous things are glad. If something is glad then it is exegetical. All exegetical, nautical things are artful. All stressful things are glad. Green things are nautical. If Fairfax is intertidal and Fairfax is stressful then Fairfax is artful. If something is stressful and exegetical then it is glad. Nancee is not nauseous.", "logic": "\nNautical(margo)\nNautical(fairfax)\nStressful(nancee)\nforall x (Glad(x) -> Nauseous(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Glad(x))\nforall x (Glad(x) -> Exegetical(x))\nforall x (Exegetical(x) and Nautical(x) -> Artful(x))\nforall x (Stressful(x) -> Glad(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Nautical(x))\nIntertidal(fairfax) and Stressful(fairfax) -> Artful(fairfax)\nforall x (Stressful(x) and Exegetical(x) -> Glad(x))\n\nnot Nauseous(nancee)\n\nStressful(nancee) and forall x (Stressful(x) -> Glad(x)) -> therefore Glad(nancee) Glad(nancee) and forall x (Glad(x) -> Nauseous(x)) -> therefore Nauseous(nancee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Lorilyn is uncoerced. Louise is uncoerced. Sivert is surplus. If something is yugoslav then it is aquiline. All aquiline things are yugoslav. If something is yugoslav then it is fated. All fated, uncoerced things are heretical. All surplus things are yugoslav. Green things are uncoerced. If Louise is malefic and Louise is surplus then Louise is heretical. If something is surplus and fated then it is yugoslav. Sivert is uncoerced.", "logic": "\nUncoerced(lorilyn)\nUncoerced(louise)\nSurplus(sivert)\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Aquiline(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) -> Yugoslav(x))\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Fated(x))\nforall x (Fated(x) and Uncoerced(x) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Yugoslav(x))\nforall x (Aquiline(x) -> Uncoerced(x))\nMalefic(louise) and Surplus(louise) -> Heretical(louise)\nforall x (Surplus(x) and Fated(x) -> Yugoslav(x))\n\nUncoerced(sivert)\n\nSurplus(sivert) and forall x (Surplus(x) -> Yugoslav(x)) -> therefore Yugoslav(sivert) Yugoslav(sivert) and forall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Aquiline(x)) -> therefore Aquiline(sivert) Aquiline(sivert) and forall x (Aquiline(x) -> Uncoerced(x)) -> therefore Uncoerced(sivert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Martina is hammy. Kelsi is hammy. Rodrick is unartistic. If something is bilabial then it is brisk. All brisk things are bilabial. If something is bilabial then it is diarrheic. All diarrheic, hammy things are unannealed. All unartistic things are bilabial. Green things are hammy. If Kelsi is alfresco and Kelsi is unartistic then Kelsi is unannealed. If something is unartistic and diarrheic then it is bilabial. Rodrick is not hammy.", "logic": "\nHammy(martina)\nHammy(kelsi)\nUnartistic(rodrick)\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Brisk(x))\nforall x (Brisk(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Diarrheic(x))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Hammy(x) -> Unannealed(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Brisk(x) -> Hammy(x))\nAlfresco(kelsi) and Unartistic(kelsi) -> Unannealed(kelsi)\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and Diarrheic(x) -> Bilabial(x))\n\nnot Hammy(rodrick)\n\nUnartistic(rodrick) and forall x (Unartistic(x) -> Bilabial(x)) -> therefore Bilabial(rodrick) Bilabial(rodrick) and forall x (Bilabial(x) -> Brisk(x)) -> therefore Brisk(rodrick) Brisk(rodrick) and forall x (Brisk(x) -> Hammy(x)) -> therefore Hammy(rodrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Raphaela is engrossing. Alica is engrossing. Gwynne is enteral. If something is largish then it is shaky. All shaky things are largish. If something is largish then it is swingy. All swingy, engrossing things are pilary. All enteral things are largish. Green things are engrossing. If Alica is algonkian and Alica is enteral then Alica is pilary. If something is enteral and swingy then it is largish. Alica is not pilary.", "logic": "\nEngrossing(raphaela)\nEngrossing(alica)\nEnteral(gwynne)\nforall x (Largish(x) -> Shaky(x))\nforall x (Shaky(x) -> Largish(x))\nforall x (Largish(x) -> Swingy(x))\nforall x (Swingy(x) and Engrossing(x) -> Pilary(x))\nforall x (Enteral(x) -> Largish(x))\nforall x (Shaky(x) -> Engrossing(x))\nAlgonkian(alica) and Enteral(alica) -> Pilary(alica)\nforall x (Enteral(x) and Swingy(x) -> Largish(x))\n\nnot Pilary(alica)\n\nforall x (Swingy(x) and Engrossing(x) -> Pilary(x)) <- forall x (Largish(x) -> Swingy(x)) <- forall x (Shaky(x) -> Largish(x)) <- forall x (Largish(x) -> Shaky(x)) <- forall x (Enteral(x) -> Largish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Jessica is disorderly. Vin is disorderly. April is diminuendo. If something is straw then it is union. All union things are straw. If something is straw then it is changed. All changed, disorderly things are staggering. All diminuendo things are straw. Green things are disorderly. If Vin is grubby and Vin is diminuendo then Vin is staggering. If something is diminuendo and changed then it is straw. Vin is changed.", "logic": "\nDisorderly(jessica)\nDisorderly(vin)\nDiminuendo(april)\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Union(x))\nforall x (Union(x) -> Straw(x))\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Changed(x))\nforall x (Changed(x) and Disorderly(x) -> Staggering(x))\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Straw(x))\nforall x (Union(x) -> Disorderly(x))\nGrubby(vin) and Diminuendo(vin) -> Staggering(vin)\nforall x (Diminuendo(x) and Changed(x) -> Straw(x))\n\nChanged(vin)\n\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Changed(x)) <- forall x (Union(x) -> Straw(x)) <- forall x (Straw(x) -> Union(x)) <- forall x (Diminuendo(x) -> Straw(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Kathlin is oxidized. Andi is oxidized. Amadeus is advance. If something is dumpy then it is cheapjack. All cheapjack things are dumpy. If something is dumpy then it is hypaethral. All hypaethral, oxidized things are remedial. All advance things are dumpy. Green things are oxidized. If Andi is quizzical and Andi is advance then Andi is remedial. If something is advance and hypaethral then it is dumpy. Kathlin is not hypaethral.", "logic": "\nOxidized(kathlin)\nOxidized(andi)\nAdvance(amadeus)\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Cheapjack(x))\nforall x (Cheapjack(x) -> Dumpy(x))\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) and Oxidized(x) -> Remedial(x))\nforall x (Advance(x) -> Dumpy(x))\nforall x (Cheapjack(x) -> Oxidized(x))\nQuizzical(andi) and Advance(andi) -> Remedial(andi)\nforall x (Advance(x) and Hypaethral(x) -> Dumpy(x))\n\nnot Hypaethral(kathlin)\n\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Hypaethral(x)) <- forall x (Cheapjack(x) -> Dumpy(x)) <- forall x (Dumpy(x) -> Cheapjack(x)) <- forall x (Advance(x) -> Dumpy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Rosemarie is markovian. Mona is markovian. Chase is pluperfect. If something is liege then it is incapable. All incapable things are liege. If something is liege then it is dendriform. All dendriform, markovian things are alveolate. All pluperfect things are liege. Green things are markovian. If Mona is incidental and Mona is pluperfect then Mona is alveolate. If something is pluperfect and dendriform then it is liege. Rosemarie is alveolate.", "logic": "\nMarkovian(rosemarie)\nMarkovian(mona)\nPluperfect(chase)\nforall x (Liege(x) -> Incapable(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Liege(x) -> Dendriform(x))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) and Markovian(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Pluperfect(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Markovian(x))\nIncidental(mona) and Pluperfect(mona) -> Alveolate(mona)\nforall x (Pluperfect(x) and Dendriform(x) -> Liege(x))\n\nAlveolate(rosemarie)\n\nforall x (Dendriform(x) and Markovian(x) -> Alveolate(x)) <- forall x (Liege(x) -> Dendriform(x)) <- forall x (Incapable(x) -> Liege(x)) <- forall x (Liege(x) -> Incapable(x)) <- forall x (Pluperfect(x) -> Liege(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Sheelagh is negroid. Waring is negroid. Allyn is federal. If something is cyanogenic then it is monoclinic. All monoclinic things are cyanogenic. If something is cyanogenic then it is confining. All confining, negroid things are flowered. All federal things are cyanogenic. Green things are negroid. If Waring is apocrine and Waring is federal then Waring is flowered. If something is federal and confining then it is cyanogenic. Allyn is not apocrine.", "logic": "\nNegroid(sheelagh)\nNegroid(waring)\nFederal(allyn)\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nforall x (Cyanogenic(x) -> Confining(x))\nforall x (Confining(x) and Negroid(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) -> Negroid(x))\nApocrine(waring) and Federal(waring) -> Flowered(waring)\nforall x (Federal(x) and Confining(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\n\nnot Apocrine(allyn)\n\nnot Apocrine(allyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Karlotta is exaugural. Bernie is exaugural. Berti is present. If something is feeble then it is churning. All churning things are feeble. If something is feeble then it is sandlike. All sandlike, exaugural things are tops. All present things are feeble. Green things are exaugural. If Bernie is bimestrial and Bernie is present then Bernie is tops. If something is present and sandlike then it is feeble. Karlotta is present.", "logic": "\nExaugural(karlotta)\nExaugural(bernie)\nPresent(berti)\nforall x (Feeble(x) -> Churning(x))\nforall x (Churning(x) -> Feeble(x))\nforall x (Feeble(x) -> Sandlike(x))\nforall x (Sandlike(x) and Exaugural(x) -> Tops(x))\nforall x (Present(x) -> Feeble(x))\nforall x (Churning(x) -> Exaugural(x))\nBimestrial(bernie) and Present(bernie) -> Tops(bernie)\nforall x (Present(x) and Sandlike(x) -> Feeble(x))\n\nPresent(karlotta)\n\nPresent(karlotta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Farra is hidden. Verene is hidden. Sissie is astomatous. If something is cheerful then it is wavelike. All wavelike things are cheerful. If something is cheerful then it is prognostic. All prognostic, hidden things are subsidized. All astomatous things are cheerful. Green things are hidden. If Verene is sanctioned and Verene is astomatous then Verene is subsidized. If something is astomatous and prognostic then it is cheerful. Verene is not astomatous.", "logic": "\nHidden(farra)\nHidden(verene)\nAstomatous(sissie)\nforall x (Cheerful(x) -> Wavelike(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) -> Cheerful(x))\nforall x (Cheerful(x) -> Prognostic(x))\nforall x (Prognostic(x) and Hidden(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Astomatous(x) -> Cheerful(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) -> Hidden(x))\nSanctioned(verene) and Astomatous(verene) -> Subsidized(verene)\nforall x (Astomatous(x) and Prognostic(x) -> Cheerful(x))\n\nnot Astomatous(verene)\n\nnot Astomatous(verene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Geneva is mural. Terrell is mural. Wat is fruitless. If something is redolent then it is newborn. All newborn things are redolent. If something is redolent then it is moot. All moot, mural things are constant. All fruitless things are redolent. Green things are mural. If Terrell is paradisiac and Terrell is fruitless then Terrell is constant. If something is fruitless and moot then it is redolent. Terrell is paradisiac.", "logic": "\nMural(geneva)\nMural(terrell)\nFruitless(wat)\nforall x (Redolent(x) -> Newborn(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Redolent(x) -> Moot(x))\nforall x (Moot(x) and Mural(x) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Fruitless(x) -> Redolent(x))\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Mural(x))\nParadisiac(terrell) and Fruitless(terrell) -> Constant(terrell)\nforall x (Fruitless(x) and Moot(x) -> Redolent(x))\n\nParadisiac(terrell)\n\nParadisiac(terrell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-302"} {"premises": "Cicily is plumate. Cicily is haematal. Cicily is thick. Cicily is uncivil. Cicily is arresting. Cicily is pitiable. Enriqueta is plumate. Thaddus is plumate. Thaddus is uncivil. Thaddus is arresting. If someone is plumate and not uncivil then they are haematal. Green, pitiable people are haematal. If Thaddus is plumate and Thaddus is pitiable then Thaddus is smoothened. All uncivil people are pitiable. If someone is smoothened and not uncivil then they are arresting. Big people are arresting. If someone is pitiable and not haematal then they are arresting. All arresting people are thick. Thaddus is plumate.", "logic": "\nPlumate(cicily)\nHaematal(cicily)\nThick(cicily)\nUncivil(cicily)\nArresting(cicily)\nPitiable(cicily)\nPlumate(enriqueta)\nPlumate(thaddus)\nUncivil(thaddus)\nArresting(thaddus)\nforall x (Plumate(x) and not Uncivil(x) -> Haematal(x))\nforall x (Smoothened(x) and Pitiable(x) -> Haematal(x))\nPlumate(thaddus) and Pitiable(thaddus) -> Smoothened(thaddus)\nforall x (Uncivil(x) -> Pitiable(x))\nforall x (Smoothened(x) and not Uncivil(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Plumate(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Pitiable(x) and not Haematal(x) -> Arresting(x))\nforall x (Arresting(x) -> Thick(x))\n\nPlumate(thaddus)\n\ntherefore Plumate(thaddus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Sibella is ungrudging. Sibella is nonfatal. Sibella is inky. Sibella is astragalar. Sibella is swaybacked. Sibella is afghani. Kassandra is ungrudging. Walton is ungrudging. Walton is astragalar. Walton is swaybacked. If someone is ungrudging and not astragalar then they are nonfatal. Green, afghani people are nonfatal. If Walton is ungrudging and Walton is afghani then Walton is orbicular. All astragalar people are afghani. If someone is orbicular and not astragalar then they are swaybacked. Big people are swaybacked. If someone is afghani and not nonfatal then they are swaybacked. All swaybacked people are inky. Walton is not astragalar.", "logic": "\nUngrudging(sibella)\nNonfatal(sibella)\nInky(sibella)\nAstragalar(sibella)\nSwaybacked(sibella)\nAfghani(sibella)\nUngrudging(kassandra)\nUngrudging(walton)\nAstragalar(walton)\nSwaybacked(walton)\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) and not Astragalar(x) -> Nonfatal(x))\nforall x (Orbicular(x) and Afghani(x) -> Nonfatal(x))\nUngrudging(walton) and Afghani(walton) -> Orbicular(walton)\nforall x (Astragalar(x) -> Afghani(x))\nforall x (Orbicular(x) and not Astragalar(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) and not Nonfatal(x) -> Swaybacked(x))\nforall x (Swaybacked(x) -> Inky(x))\n\nnot Astragalar(walton)\n\ntherefore Astragalar(walton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Gertrudis is subfusc. Gertrudis is outre. Gertrudis is vigesimal. Gertrudis is expansible. Gertrudis is pedestrian. Gertrudis is chthonic. Merrel is subfusc. Claire is subfusc. Claire is expansible. Claire is pedestrian. If someone is subfusc and not expansible then they are outre. Green, chthonic people are outre. If Claire is subfusc and Claire is chthonic then Claire is perfervid. All expansible people are chthonic. If someone is perfervid and not expansible then they are pedestrian. Big people are pedestrian. If someone is chthonic and not outre then they are pedestrian. All pedestrian people are vigesimal. Merrel is pedestrian.", "logic": "\nSubfusc(gertrudis)\nOutre(gertrudis)\nVigesimal(gertrudis)\nExpansible(gertrudis)\nPedestrian(gertrudis)\nChthonic(gertrudis)\nSubfusc(merrel)\nSubfusc(claire)\nExpansible(claire)\nPedestrian(claire)\nforall x (Subfusc(x) and not Expansible(x) -> Outre(x))\nforall x (Perfervid(x) and Chthonic(x) -> Outre(x))\nSubfusc(claire) and Chthonic(claire) -> Perfervid(claire)\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Chthonic(x))\nforall x (Perfervid(x) and not Expansible(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Chthonic(x) and not Outre(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\n\nPedestrian(merrel)\n\nSubfusc(merrel) and forall x (Subfusc(x) -> Pedestrian(x)) -> therefore Pedestrian(merrel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Richy is rubicund. Richy is fleeceable. Richy is beamish. Richy is frigid. Richy is neolithic. Richy is historical. Devin is rubicund. Mervin is rubicund. Mervin is frigid. Mervin is neolithic. If someone is rubicund and not frigid then they are fleeceable. Green, historical people are fleeceable. If Mervin is rubicund and Mervin is historical then Mervin is horrified. All frigid people are historical. If someone is horrified and not frigid then they are neolithic. Big people are neolithic. If someone is historical and not fleeceable then they are neolithic. All neolithic people are beamish. Mervin is not historical.", "logic": "\nRubicund(richy)\nFleeceable(richy)\nBeamish(richy)\nFrigid(richy)\nNeolithic(richy)\nHistorical(richy)\nRubicund(devin)\nRubicund(mervin)\nFrigid(mervin)\nNeolithic(mervin)\nforall x (Rubicund(x) and not Frigid(x) -> Fleeceable(x))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and Historical(x) -> Fleeceable(x))\nRubicund(mervin) and Historical(mervin) -> Horrified(mervin)\nforall x (Frigid(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Horrified(x) and not Frigid(x) -> Neolithic(x))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) -> Neolithic(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) and not Fleeceable(x) -> Neolithic(x))\nforall x (Neolithic(x) -> Beamish(x))\n\nnot Historical(mervin)\n\nFrigid(mervin) and forall x (Frigid(x) -> Historical(x)) -> therefore Historical(mervin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Loleta is agonizing. Loleta is nonsweet. Loleta is heliac. Loleta is colloidal. Loleta is moved. Loleta is lowbrow. Osborn is agonizing. Stephie is agonizing. Stephie is colloidal. Stephie is moved. If someone is agonizing and not colloidal then they are nonsweet. Green, lowbrow people are nonsweet. If Stephie is agonizing and Stephie is lowbrow then Stephie is iranian. All colloidal people are lowbrow. If someone is iranian and not colloidal then they are moved. Big people are moved. If someone is lowbrow and not nonsweet then they are moved. All moved people are heliac. Stephie is iranian.", "logic": "\nAgonizing(loleta)\nNonsweet(loleta)\nHeliac(loleta)\nColloidal(loleta)\nMoved(loleta)\nLowbrow(loleta)\nAgonizing(osborn)\nAgonizing(stephie)\nColloidal(stephie)\nMoved(stephie)\nforall x (Agonizing(x) and not Colloidal(x) -> Nonsweet(x))\nforall x (Iranian(x) and Lowbrow(x) -> Nonsweet(x))\nAgonizing(stephie) and Lowbrow(stephie) -> Iranian(stephie)\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\nforall x (Iranian(x) and not Colloidal(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) and not Nonsweet(x) -> Moved(x))\nforall x (Moved(x) -> Heliac(x))\n\nIranian(stephie)\n\nColloidal(stephie) and forall x (Colloidal(x) -> Lowbrow(x)) -> therefore Lowbrow(stephie) Agonizing(stephie) and Lowbrow(stephie) and Agonizing(stephie) and Lowbrow(stephie) -> Iranian(stephie) -> therefore Iranian(stephie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Beatrix is compact. Beatrix is excusable. Beatrix is batwing. Beatrix is sumatran. Beatrix is killable. Beatrix is unfamiliar. Natalia is compact. Gwen is compact. Gwen is sumatran. Gwen is killable. If someone is compact and not sumatran then they are excusable. Green, unfamiliar people are excusable. If Gwen is compact and Gwen is unfamiliar then Gwen is coronary. All sumatran people are unfamiliar. If someone is coronary and not sumatran then they are killable. Big people are killable. If someone is unfamiliar and not excusable then they are killable. All killable people are batwing. Natalia is not batwing.", "logic": "\nCompact(beatrix)\nExcusable(beatrix)\nBatwing(beatrix)\nSumatran(beatrix)\nKillable(beatrix)\nUnfamiliar(beatrix)\nCompact(natalia)\nCompact(gwen)\nSumatran(gwen)\nKillable(gwen)\nforall x (Compact(x) and not Sumatran(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Coronary(x) and Unfamiliar(x) -> Excusable(x))\nCompact(gwen) and Unfamiliar(gwen) -> Coronary(gwen)\nforall x (Sumatran(x) -> Unfamiliar(x))\nforall x (Coronary(x) and not Sumatran(x) -> Killable(x))\nforall x (Compact(x) -> Killable(x))\nforall x (Unfamiliar(x) and not Excusable(x) -> Killable(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) -> Batwing(x))\n\nnot Batwing(natalia)\n\nCompact(natalia) and forall x (Compact(x) -> Killable(x)) -> therefore Killable(natalia) Killable(natalia) and forall x (Killable(x) -> Batwing(x)) -> therefore Batwing(natalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Betti is bacillar. Betti is punitory. Betti is arawakan. Betti is footsore. Betti is starry. Betti is unplanned. Wilt is bacillar. Libbey is bacillar. Libbey is footsore. Libbey is starry. If someone is bacillar and not footsore then they are punitory. Green, unplanned people are punitory. If Libbey is bacillar and Libbey is unplanned then Libbey is mousey. All footsore people are unplanned. If someone is mousey and not footsore then they are starry. Big people are starry. If someone is unplanned and not punitory then they are starry. All starry people are arawakan. Libbey is punitory.", "logic": "\nBacillar(betti)\nPunitory(betti)\nArawakan(betti)\nFootsore(betti)\nStarry(betti)\nUnplanned(betti)\nBacillar(wilt)\nBacillar(libbey)\nFootsore(libbey)\nStarry(libbey)\nforall x (Bacillar(x) and not Footsore(x) -> Punitory(x))\nforall x (Mousey(x) and Unplanned(x) -> Punitory(x))\nBacillar(libbey) and Unplanned(libbey) -> Mousey(libbey)\nforall x (Footsore(x) -> Unplanned(x))\nforall x (Mousey(x) and not Footsore(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Bacillar(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Unplanned(x) and not Punitory(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Arawakan(x))\n\nPunitory(libbey)\n\nFootsore(libbey) and forall x (Footsore(x) -> Unplanned(x)) -> therefore Unplanned(libbey) Bacillar(libbey) and Unplanned(libbey) and Bacillar(libbey) and Unplanned(libbey) -> Mousey(libbey) -> therefore Mousey(libbey) Footsore(libbey) and forall x (Footsore(x) -> Unplanned(x)) -> therefore Unplanned(libbey) Mousey(libbey) and Unplanned(libbey) and forall x (Mousey(x) and Unplanned(x) -> Punitory(x)) -> therefore Punitory(libbey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Shell is lebanese. Shell is cogitable. Shell is unrevealed. Shell is mass. Shell is modish. Shell is baseless. Shannan is lebanese. Jeromy is lebanese. Jeromy is mass. Jeromy is modish. If someone is lebanese and not mass then they are cogitable. Green, baseless people are cogitable. If Jeromy is lebanese and Jeromy is baseless then Jeromy is absolved. All mass people are baseless. If someone is absolved and not mass then they are modish. Big people are modish. If someone is baseless and not cogitable then they are modish. All modish people are unrevealed. Jeromy is not cogitable.", "logic": "\nLebanese(shell)\nCogitable(shell)\nUnrevealed(shell)\nMass(shell)\nModish(shell)\nBaseless(shell)\nLebanese(shannan)\nLebanese(jeromy)\nMass(jeromy)\nModish(jeromy)\nforall x (Lebanese(x) and not Mass(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nforall x (Absolved(x) and Baseless(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nLebanese(jeromy) and Baseless(jeromy) -> Absolved(jeromy)\nforall x (Mass(x) -> Baseless(x))\nforall x (Absolved(x) and not Mass(x) -> Modish(x))\nforall x (Lebanese(x) -> Modish(x))\nforall x (Baseless(x) and not Cogitable(x) -> Modish(x))\nforall x (Modish(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\n\nnot Cogitable(jeromy)\n\nMass(jeromy) and forall x (Mass(x) -> Baseless(x)) -> therefore Baseless(jeromy) Lebanese(jeromy) and Baseless(jeromy) and Lebanese(jeromy) and Baseless(jeromy) -> Absolved(jeromy) -> therefore Absolved(jeromy) Mass(jeromy) and forall x (Mass(x) -> Baseless(x)) -> therefore Baseless(jeromy) Absolved(jeromy) and Baseless(jeromy) and forall x (Absolved(x) and Baseless(x) -> Cogitable(x)) -> therefore Cogitable(jeromy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Chane is alimental. Chane is semiannual. Chane is vaporous. Chane is steamed. Chane is spent. Chane is centered. Sibylla is alimental. Codee is alimental. Codee is steamed. Codee is spent. If someone is alimental and not steamed then they are semiannual. Green, centered people are semiannual. If Codee is alimental and Codee is centered then Codee is festal. All steamed people are centered. If someone is festal and not steamed then they are spent. Big people are spent. If someone is centered and not semiannual then they are spent. All spent people are vaporous. Sibylla is not centered.", "logic": "\nAlimental(chane)\nSemiannual(chane)\nVaporous(chane)\nSteamed(chane)\nSpent(chane)\nCentered(chane)\nAlimental(sibylla)\nAlimental(codee)\nSteamed(codee)\nSpent(codee)\nforall x (Alimental(x) and not Steamed(x) -> Semiannual(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and Centered(x) -> Semiannual(x))\nAlimental(codee) and Centered(codee) -> Festal(codee)\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Festal(x) and not Steamed(x) -> Spent(x))\nforall x (Alimental(x) -> Spent(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) and not Semiannual(x) -> Spent(x))\nforall x (Spent(x) -> Vaporous(x))\n\nnot Centered(sibylla)\n\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Centered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Oral is hotheaded. Oral is bearing. Oral is luxe. Oral is enceinte. Oral is unmanlike. Oral is unmannerly. Harriett is hotheaded. Natalee is hotheaded. Natalee is enceinte. Natalee is unmanlike. If someone is hotheaded and not enceinte then they are bearing. Green, unmannerly people are bearing. If Natalee is hotheaded and Natalee is unmannerly then Natalee is intended. All enceinte people are unmannerly. If someone is intended and not enceinte then they are unmanlike. Big people are unmanlike. If someone is unmannerly and not bearing then they are unmanlike. All unmanlike people are luxe. Harriett is bearing.", "logic": "\nHotheaded(oral)\nBearing(oral)\nLuxe(oral)\nEnceinte(oral)\nUnmanlike(oral)\nUnmannerly(oral)\nHotheaded(harriett)\nHotheaded(natalee)\nEnceinte(natalee)\nUnmanlike(natalee)\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) and not Enceinte(x) -> Bearing(x))\nforall x (Intended(x) and Unmannerly(x) -> Bearing(x))\nHotheaded(natalee) and Unmannerly(natalee) -> Intended(natalee)\nforall x (Enceinte(x) -> Unmannerly(x))\nforall x (Intended(x) and not Enceinte(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Unmannerly(x) and not Bearing(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) -> Luxe(x))\n\nBearing(harriett)\n\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) and not Enceinte(x) -> Bearing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Quintana is chassidic. Quintana is promissory. Quintana is monthly. Quintana is improbable. Quintana is harsh. Quintana is collected. Sherye is chassidic. Devora is chassidic. Devora is improbable. Devora is harsh. If someone is chassidic and not improbable then they are promissory. Green, collected people are promissory. If Devora is chassidic and Devora is collected then Devora is greyish. All improbable people are collected. If someone is greyish and not improbable then they are harsh. Big people are harsh. If someone is collected and not promissory then they are harsh. All harsh people are monthly. Quintana is not greyish.", "logic": "\nChassidic(quintana)\nPromissory(quintana)\nMonthly(quintana)\nImprobable(quintana)\nHarsh(quintana)\nCollected(quintana)\nChassidic(sherye)\nChassidic(devora)\nImprobable(devora)\nHarsh(devora)\nforall x (Chassidic(x) and not Improbable(x) -> Promissory(x))\nforall x (Greyish(x) and Collected(x) -> Promissory(x))\nChassidic(devora) and Collected(devora) -> Greyish(devora)\nforall x (Improbable(x) -> Collected(x))\nforall x (Greyish(x) and not Improbable(x) -> Harsh(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) -> Harsh(x))\nforall x (Collected(x) and not Promissory(x) -> Harsh(x))\nforall x (Harsh(x) -> Monthly(x))\n\nnot Greyish(quintana)\n\nnot Greyish(quintana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "Kata is reversed. Kata is wiry. Kata is unangry. Kata is fingered. Kata is clouded. Kata is anachronic. Elliot is reversed. Illa is reversed. Illa is fingered. Illa is clouded. If someone is reversed and not fingered then they are wiry. Green, anachronic people are wiry. If Illa is reversed and Illa is anachronic then Illa is distraught. All fingered people are anachronic. If someone is distraught and not fingered then they are clouded. Big people are clouded. If someone is anachronic and not wiry then they are clouded. All clouded people are unangry. Elliot is fingered.", "logic": "\nReversed(kata)\nWiry(kata)\nUnangry(kata)\nFingered(kata)\nClouded(kata)\nAnachronic(kata)\nReversed(elliot)\nReversed(illa)\nFingered(illa)\nClouded(illa)\nforall x (Reversed(x) and not Fingered(x) -> Wiry(x))\nforall x (Distraught(x) and Anachronic(x) -> Wiry(x))\nReversed(illa) and Anachronic(illa) -> Distraught(illa)\nforall x (Fingered(x) -> Anachronic(x))\nforall x (Distraught(x) and not Fingered(x) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Reversed(x) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Anachronic(x) and not Wiry(x) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Unangry(x))\n\nFingered(elliot)\n\nFingered(elliot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-324"} {"premises": "The juan is crippled. If something is adrenergic and not crippled then it is anaerobic. Red, forbidden things are anaerobic. If something is rimeless and not crippled then it is forbidden. If something is rimeless then it is forbidden. All adrenergic things are forbidden. Nice, adrenergic things are rimeless. Big things are rimeless. If something is rimeless then it is adrenergic. The juan is crippled.", "logic": "\nCrippled(juan)\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) and not Crippled(x) -> Anaerobic(x))\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) and Forbidden(x) -> Anaerobic(x))\nforall x (Rimeless(x) and not Crippled(x) -> Forbidden(x))\nforall x (Rimeless(x) -> Forbidden(x))\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) -> Forbidden(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) and Adrenergic(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Rimeless(x) -> Adrenergic(x))\n\nCrippled(juan)\n\ntherefore Crippled(juan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The elke is mauve. If something is tapped and not mauve then it is bottommost. Red, decumbent things are bottommost. If something is frowsty and not mauve then it is decumbent. If something is frowsty then it is decumbent. All tapped things are decumbent. Nice, tapped things are frowsty. Big things are frowsty. If something is frowsty then it is tapped. The elke is not mauve.", "logic": "\nMauve(elke)\nforall x (Tapped(x) and not Mauve(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) and Decumbent(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nforall x (Frowsty(x) and not Mauve(x) -> Decumbent(x))\nforall x (Frowsty(x) -> Decumbent(x))\nforall x (Tapped(x) -> Decumbent(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) and Tapped(x) -> Frowsty(x))\nforall x (Mauve(x) -> Frowsty(x))\nforall x (Frowsty(x) -> Tapped(x))\n\nnot Mauve(elke)\n\ntherefore Mauve(elke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The cherri is threatened. If something is interred and not threatened then it is sebaceous. Red, regulative things are sebaceous. If something is archaean and not threatened then it is regulative. If something is archaean then it is regulative. All interred things are regulative. Nice, interred things are archaean. Big things are archaean. If something is archaean then it is interred. The cherri is archaean.", "logic": "\nThreatened(cherri)\nforall x (Interred(x) and not Threatened(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nforall x (Interred(x) and Regulative(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nforall x (Archaean(x) and not Threatened(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Interred(x) -> Regulative(x))\nforall x (Sebaceous(x) and Interred(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Interred(x))\n\nArchaean(cherri)\n\nThreatened(cherri) and forall x (Threatened(x) -> Archaean(x)) -> therefore Archaean(cherri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The gerrit is cervical. If something is bifacial and not cervical then it is judicial. Red, surface things are judicial. If something is uncarpeted and not cervical then it is surface. If something is uncarpeted then it is surface. All bifacial things are surface. Nice, bifacial things are uncarpeted. Big things are uncarpeted. If something is uncarpeted then it is bifacial. The gerrit is not uncarpeted.", "logic": "\nCervical(gerrit)\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and not Cervical(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Surface(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) and not Cervical(x) -> Surface(x))\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) -> Surface(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Surface(x))\nforall x (Judicial(x) and Bifacial(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) -> Bifacial(x))\n\nnot Uncarpeted(gerrit)\n\nCervical(gerrit) and forall x (Cervical(x) -> Uncarpeted(x)) -> therefore Uncarpeted(gerrit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The rori is undreamt. If something is malaysian and not undreamt then it is attached. Red, trabecular things are attached. If something is mitigatory and not undreamt then it is trabecular. If something is mitigatory then it is trabecular. All malaysian things are trabecular. Nice, malaysian things are mitigatory. Big things are mitigatory. If something is mitigatory then it is malaysian. The rori is malaysian.", "logic": "\nUndreamt(rori)\nforall x (Malaysian(x) and not Undreamt(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Malaysian(x) and Trabecular(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) and not Undreamt(x) -> Trabecular(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Trabecular(x))\nforall x (Malaysian(x) -> Trabecular(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) and Malaysian(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Mitigatory(x))\nforall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Malaysian(x))\n\nMalaysian(rori)\n\nUndreamt(rori) and forall x (Undreamt(x) -> Mitigatory(x)) -> therefore Mitigatory(rori) Mitigatory(rori) and forall x (Mitigatory(x) -> Malaysian(x)) -> therefore Malaysian(rori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The sena is pilary. If something is acritical and not pilary then it is arched. Red, committed things are arched. If something is plundered and not pilary then it is committed. If something is plundered then it is committed. All acritical things are committed. Nice, acritical things are plundered. Big things are plundered. If something is plundered then it is acritical. The sena is not acritical.", "logic": "\nPilary(sena)\nforall x (Acritical(x) and not Pilary(x) -> Arched(x))\nforall x (Acritical(x) and Committed(x) -> Arched(x))\nforall x (Plundered(x) and not Pilary(x) -> Committed(x))\nforall x (Plundered(x) -> Committed(x))\nforall x (Acritical(x) -> Committed(x))\nforall x (Arched(x) and Acritical(x) -> Plundered(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Plundered(x))\nforall x (Plundered(x) -> Acritical(x))\n\nnot Acritical(sena)\n\nPilary(sena) and forall x (Pilary(x) -> Plundered(x)) -> therefore Plundered(sena) Plundered(sena) and forall x (Plundered(x) -> Acritical(x)) -> therefore Acritical(sena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The brandea is labouring. If something is umbilicate and not labouring then it is vitalizing. Red, laudatory things are vitalizing. If something is peanut and not labouring then it is laudatory. If something is peanut then it is laudatory. All umbilicate things are laudatory. Nice, umbilicate things are peanut. Big things are peanut. If something is peanut then it is umbilicate. The brandea is vitalizing.", "logic": "\nLabouring(brandea)\nforall x (Umbilicate(x) and not Labouring(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Umbilicate(x) and Laudatory(x) -> Vitalizing(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) and not Labouring(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Umbilicate(x) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) and Umbilicate(x) -> Peanut(x))\nforall x (Labouring(x) -> Peanut(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\n\nVitalizing(brandea)\n\nLabouring(brandea) and forall x (Labouring(x) -> Peanut(x)) -> therefore Peanut(brandea) Peanut(brandea) and forall x (Peanut(x) -> Umbilicate(x)) -> therefore Umbilicate(brandea) Labouring(brandea) and forall x (Labouring(x) -> Peanut(x)) -> therefore Peanut(brandea) Peanut(brandea) and forall x (Peanut(x) -> Laudatory(x)) -> therefore Laudatory(brandea) Umbilicate(brandea) and Laudatory(brandea) and forall x (Umbilicate(x) and Laudatory(x) -> Vitalizing(x)) -> therefore Vitalizing(brandea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The ramsey is affective. If something is pitchy and not affective then it is abdominal. Red, sandaled things are abdominal. If something is botanical and not affective then it is sandaled. If something is botanical then it is sandaled. All pitchy things are sandaled. Nice, pitchy things are botanical. Big things are botanical. If something is botanical then it is pitchy. The ramsey is not abdominal.", "logic": "\nAffective(ramsey)\nforall x (Pitchy(x) and not Affective(x) -> Abdominal(x))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) and Sandaled(x) -> Abdominal(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) and not Affective(x) -> Sandaled(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) -> Sandaled(x))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) -> Sandaled(x))\nforall x (Abdominal(x) and Pitchy(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Affective(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) -> Pitchy(x))\n\nnot Abdominal(ramsey)\n\nAffective(ramsey) and forall x (Affective(x) -> Botanical(x)) -> therefore Botanical(ramsey) Botanical(ramsey) and forall x (Botanical(x) -> Pitchy(x)) -> therefore Pitchy(ramsey) Affective(ramsey) and forall x (Affective(x) -> Botanical(x)) -> therefore Botanical(ramsey) Botanical(ramsey) and forall x (Botanical(x) -> Sandaled(x)) -> therefore Sandaled(ramsey) Pitchy(ramsey) and Sandaled(ramsey) and forall x (Pitchy(x) and Sandaled(x) -> Abdominal(x)) -> therefore Abdominal(ramsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The melinde is snappish. If something is slicked and not snappish then it is bracing. Red, glowing things are bracing. If something is taut and not snappish then it is glowing. If something is taut then it is glowing. All slicked things are glowing. Nice, slicked things are taut. Big things are taut. If something is taut then it is slicked. The melinde does not chase the melinde.", "logic": "\nSnappish(melinde)\nforall x (Slicked(x) and not Snappish(x) -> Bracing(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) and Glowing(x) -> Bracing(x))\nforall x (Taut(x) and not Snappish(x) -> Glowing(x))\nforall x (Taut(x) -> Glowing(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) -> Glowing(x))\nforall x (Bracing(x) and Slicked(x) -> Taut(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Taut(x))\nforall x (Taut(x) -> Slicked(x))\n\nnot Chases(melinde, melinde)\n\nnot Chases(melinde, melinde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The marietta is candent. If something is astatic and not candent then it is starry. Red, unmelted things are starry. If something is agamic and not candent then it is unmelted. If something is agamic then it is unmelted. All astatic things are unmelted. Nice, astatic things are agamic. Big things are agamic. If something is agamic then it is astatic. The marietta sees the marietta.", "logic": "\nCandent(marietta)\nforall x (Astatic(x) and not Candent(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Unmelted(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) and not Candent(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) -> Unmelted(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) and Astatic(x) -> Agamic(x))\nforall x (Candent(x) -> Agamic(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Astatic(x))\n\nSees(marietta, marietta)\n\nSees(marietta, marietta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "The roanna is nucleate. The roanna is crumbly. The roanne subtilize the spike. The roanne does not see the roanna. The spike ablate the roanna. The spike exfoliate the roanna. The spike exfoliate the roanne. If something is crumbly then it exfoliate the roanna. If something subtilize the roanna and the roanna ablate the spike then the spike does not see the roanna. If something exfoliate the roanna then it ablate the roanna. If something subtilize the spike and the spike is stubborn then the spike is crumbly. If something exfoliate the spike and the spike ablate the roanna then it ablate the spike. If something is screaming and not nucleate then it ablate the spike. If something is crumbly and it subtilize the roanne then the roanne is treated. If something is nucleate and crumbly then it subtilize the roanne. The roanna is crumbly.", "logic": "\nNucleate(roanna)\nCrumbly(roanna)\nSubtilize(roanne, spike)\nnot Ablate(roanne, roanna)\nAblate(spike, roanna)\nExfoliate(spike, roanna)\nExfoliate(spike, roanne)\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Exfoliate(x, roanna))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, roanna) and Ablate(roanna, spike) -> not Ablate(spike, roanna))\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, roanna) -> Ablate(x, roanna))\nforall x (Subtilize(x, spike) and Stubborn(spike) -> Crumbly(spike))\nforall x (Exfoliate(x, spike) and Ablate(spike, roanna) -> Ablate(x, spike))\nforall x (Screaming(x) and not Nucleate(x) -> Ablate(x, spike))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Subtilize(x, roanne) -> Treated(roanne))\nforall x (Nucleate(x) and Crumbly(x) -> Subtilize(x, roanne))\n\nCrumbly(roanna)\n\ntherefore Crumbly(roanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The geeta is sold. The geeta is nauruan. The sullivan repoint the patrizia. The sullivan does not see the geeta. The patrizia namedrop the geeta. The patrizia shmoose the geeta. The patrizia shmoose the sullivan. If something is nauruan then it shmoose the geeta. If something repoint the geeta and the geeta namedrop the patrizia then the patrizia does not see the geeta. If something shmoose the geeta then it namedrop the geeta. If something repoint the patrizia and the patrizia is augustan then the patrizia is nauruan. If something shmoose the patrizia and the patrizia namedrop the geeta then it namedrop the patrizia. If something is debonaire and not sold then it namedrop the patrizia. If something is nauruan and it repoint the sullivan then the sullivan is stirring. If something is sold and nauruan then it repoint the sullivan. The patrizia does not see the geeta.", "logic": "\nSold(geeta)\nNauruan(geeta)\nRepoint(sullivan, patrizia)\nnot Namedrop(sullivan, geeta)\nNamedrop(patrizia, geeta)\nShmoose(patrizia, geeta)\nShmoose(patrizia, sullivan)\nforall x (Nauruan(x) -> Shmoose(x, geeta))\nforall x (Repoint(x, geeta) and Namedrop(geeta, patrizia) -> not Namedrop(patrizia, geeta))\nforall x (Shmoose(x, geeta) -> Namedrop(x, geeta))\nforall x (Repoint(x, patrizia) and Augustan(patrizia) -> Nauruan(patrizia))\nforall x (Shmoose(x, patrizia) and Namedrop(patrizia, geeta) -> Namedrop(x, patrizia))\nforall x (Debonaire(x) and not Sold(x) -> Namedrop(x, patrizia))\nforall x (Nauruan(x) and Repoint(x, sullivan) -> Stirring(sullivan))\nforall x (Sold(x) and Nauruan(x) -> Repoint(x, sullivan))\n\nnot Namedrop(patrizia, geeta)\n\ntherefore Namedrop(patrizia, geeta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The bethina is original. The bethina is courageous. The catharine bight the georgia. The catharine does not see the bethina. The georgia indite the bethina. The georgia haggle the bethina. The georgia haggle the catharine. If something is courageous then it haggle the bethina. If something bight the bethina and the bethina indite the georgia then the georgia does not see the bethina. If something haggle the bethina then it indite the bethina. If something bight the georgia and the georgia is empowered then the georgia is courageous. If something haggle the georgia and the georgia indite the bethina then it indite the georgia. If something is pliant and not original then it indite the georgia. If something is courageous and it bight the catharine then the catharine is cardboard. If something is original and courageous then it bight the catharine. The bethina bight the catharine.", "logic": "\nOriginal(bethina)\nCourageous(bethina)\nBight(catharine, georgia)\nnot Indite(catharine, bethina)\nIndite(georgia, bethina)\nHaggle(georgia, bethina)\nHaggle(georgia, catharine)\nforall x (Courageous(x) -> Haggle(x, bethina))\nforall x (Bight(x, bethina) and Indite(bethina, georgia) -> not Indite(georgia, bethina))\nforall x (Haggle(x, bethina) -> Indite(x, bethina))\nforall x (Bight(x, georgia) and Empowered(georgia) -> Courageous(georgia))\nforall x (Haggle(x, georgia) and Indite(georgia, bethina) -> Indite(x, georgia))\nforall x (Pliant(x) and not Original(x) -> Indite(x, georgia))\nforall x (Courageous(x) and Bight(x, catharine) -> Cardboard(catharine))\nforall x (Original(x) and Courageous(x) -> Bight(x, catharine))\n\nBight(bethina, catharine)\n\nOriginal(bethina) and Courageous(bethina) and forall x (Original(x) and Courageous(x) -> Bight(x, catharine)) -> therefore Bight(bethina, catharine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The catarina is stomachal. The catarina is impetuous. The rudolfo venesect the etheline. The rudolfo does not see the catarina. The etheline refashion the catarina. The etheline swindle the catarina. The etheline swindle the rudolfo. If something is impetuous then it swindle the catarina. If something venesect the catarina and the catarina refashion the etheline then the etheline does not see the catarina. If something swindle the catarina then it refashion the catarina. If something venesect the etheline and the etheline is astonished then the etheline is impetuous. If something swindle the etheline and the etheline refashion the catarina then it refashion the etheline. If something is developed and not stomachal then it refashion the etheline. If something is impetuous and it venesect the rudolfo then the rudolfo is thrillful. If something is stomachal and impetuous then it venesect the rudolfo. The catarina does not need the rudolfo.", "logic": "\nStomachal(catarina)\nImpetuous(catarina)\nVenesect(rudolfo, etheline)\nnot Refashion(rudolfo, catarina)\nRefashion(etheline, catarina)\nSwindle(etheline, catarina)\nSwindle(etheline, rudolfo)\nforall x (Impetuous(x) -> Swindle(x, catarina))\nforall x (Venesect(x, catarina) and Refashion(catarina, etheline) -> not Refashion(etheline, catarina))\nforall x (Swindle(x, catarina) -> Refashion(x, catarina))\nforall x (Venesect(x, etheline) and Astonished(etheline) -> Impetuous(etheline))\nforall x (Swindle(x, etheline) and Refashion(etheline, catarina) -> Refashion(x, etheline))\nforall x (Developed(x) and not Stomachal(x) -> Refashion(x, etheline))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and Venesect(x, rudolfo) -> Thrillful(rudolfo))\nforall x (Stomachal(x) and Impetuous(x) -> Venesect(x, rudolfo))\n\nnot Venesect(catarina, rudolfo)\n\nStomachal(catarina) and Impetuous(catarina) and forall x (Stomachal(x) and Impetuous(x) -> Venesect(x, rudolfo)) -> therefore Venesect(catarina, rudolfo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The teddie is turbinate. The teddie is benzylic. The lizabeth unplug the martie. The lizabeth does not see the teddie. The martie depress the teddie. The martie crenel the teddie. The martie crenel the lizabeth. If something is benzylic then it crenel the teddie. If something unplug the teddie and the teddie depress the martie then the martie does not see the teddie. If something crenel the teddie then it depress the teddie. If something unplug the martie and the martie is awesome then the martie is benzylic. If something crenel the martie and the martie depress the teddie then it depress the martie. If something is nihilistic and not turbinate then it depress the martie. If something is benzylic and it unplug the lizabeth then the lizabeth is cleared. If something is turbinate and benzylic then it unplug the lizabeth. The teddie depress the teddie.", "logic": "\nTurbinate(teddie)\nBenzylic(teddie)\nUnplug(lizabeth, martie)\nnot Depress(lizabeth, teddie)\nDepress(martie, teddie)\nCrenel(martie, teddie)\nCrenel(martie, lizabeth)\nforall x (Benzylic(x) -> Crenel(x, teddie))\nforall x (Unplug(x, teddie) and Depress(teddie, martie) -> not Depress(martie, teddie))\nforall x (Crenel(x, teddie) -> Depress(x, teddie))\nforall x (Unplug(x, martie) and Awesome(martie) -> Benzylic(martie))\nforall x (Crenel(x, martie) and Depress(martie, teddie) -> Depress(x, martie))\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) and not Turbinate(x) -> Depress(x, martie))\nforall x (Benzylic(x) and Unplug(x, lizabeth) -> Cleared(lizabeth))\nforall x (Turbinate(x) and Benzylic(x) -> Unplug(x, lizabeth))\n\nDepress(teddie, teddie)\n\nBenzylic(teddie) and forall x (Benzylic(x) -> Crenel(x, teddie)) -> therefore Crenel(teddie, teddie) Crenel(teddie, teddie) and forall x (Crenel(x, teddie) -> Depress(x, teddie)) -> therefore Depress(teddie, teddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The granville is poetic. The granville is wildcat. The harri widen the kara. The harri does not see the granville. The kara deport the granville. The kara dropkick the granville. The kara dropkick the harri. If something is wildcat then it dropkick the granville. If something widen the granville and the granville deport the kara then the kara does not see the granville. If something dropkick the granville then it deport the granville. If something widen the kara and the kara is spic then the kara is wildcat. If something dropkick the kara and the kara deport the granville then it deport the kara. If something is unhearing and not poetic then it deport the kara. If something is wildcat and it widen the harri then the harri is unconfined. If something is poetic and wildcat then it widen the harri. The granville does not see the granville.", "logic": "\nPoetic(granville)\nWildcat(granville)\nWiden(harri, kara)\nnot Deport(harri, granville)\nDeport(kara, granville)\nDropkick(kara, granville)\nDropkick(kara, harri)\nforall x (Wildcat(x) -> Dropkick(x, granville))\nforall x (Widen(x, granville) and Deport(granville, kara) -> not Deport(kara, granville))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, granville) -> Deport(x, granville))\nforall x (Widen(x, kara) and Spic(kara) -> Wildcat(kara))\nforall x (Dropkick(x, kara) and Deport(kara, granville) -> Deport(x, kara))\nforall x (Unhearing(x) and not Poetic(x) -> Deport(x, kara))\nforall x (Wildcat(x) and Widen(x, harri) -> Unconfined(harri))\nforall x (Poetic(x) and Wildcat(x) -> Widen(x, harri))\n\nnot Deport(granville, granville)\n\nWildcat(granville) and forall x (Wildcat(x) -> Dropkick(x, granville)) -> therefore Dropkick(granville, granville) Dropkick(granville, granville) and forall x (Dropkick(x, granville) -> Deport(x, granville)) -> therefore Deport(granville, granville)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The suzan is overland. The suzan is scripted. The dallas wander the cinnamon. The dallas does not see the suzan. The cinnamon evanesce the suzan. The cinnamon gallivant the suzan. The cinnamon gallivant the dallas. If something is scripted then it gallivant the suzan. If something wander the suzan and the suzan evanesce the cinnamon then the cinnamon does not see the suzan. If something gallivant the suzan then it evanesce the suzan. If something wander the cinnamon and the cinnamon is tabu then the cinnamon is scripted. If something gallivant the cinnamon and the cinnamon evanesce the suzan then it evanesce the cinnamon. If something is unremedied and not overland then it evanesce the cinnamon. If something is scripted and it wander the dallas then the dallas is obovate. If something is overland and scripted then it wander the dallas. The dallas does not need the dallas.", "logic": "\nOverland(suzan)\nScripted(suzan)\nWander(dallas, cinnamon)\nnot Evanesce(dallas, suzan)\nEvanesce(cinnamon, suzan)\nGallivant(cinnamon, suzan)\nGallivant(cinnamon, dallas)\nforall x (Scripted(x) -> Gallivant(x, suzan))\nforall x (Wander(x, suzan) and Evanesce(suzan, cinnamon) -> not Evanesce(cinnamon, suzan))\nforall x (Gallivant(x, suzan) -> Evanesce(x, suzan))\nforall x (Wander(x, cinnamon) and Tabu(cinnamon) -> Scripted(cinnamon))\nforall x (Gallivant(x, cinnamon) and Evanesce(cinnamon, suzan) -> Evanesce(x, cinnamon))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) and not Overland(x) -> Evanesce(x, cinnamon))\nforall x (Scripted(x) and Wander(x, dallas) -> Obovate(dallas))\nforall x (Overland(x) and Scripted(x) -> Wander(x, dallas))\n\nnot Wander(dallas, dallas)\n\nforall x (Overland(x) and Scripted(x) -> Wander(x, dallas)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The katti is aberdonian. The katti is noticed. The blair mortar the estella. The blair does not see the katti. The estella shoal the katti. The estella luminesce the katti. The estella luminesce the blair. If something is noticed then it luminesce the katti. If something mortar the katti and the katti shoal the estella then the estella does not see the katti. If something luminesce the katti then it shoal the katti. If something mortar the estella and the estella is unheralded then the estella is noticed. If something luminesce the estella and the estella shoal the katti then it shoal the estella. If something is cyclonal and not aberdonian then it shoal the estella. If something is noticed and it mortar the blair then the blair is refractile. If something is aberdonian and noticed then it mortar the blair. The estella is noticed.", "logic": "\nAberdonian(katti)\nNoticed(katti)\nMortar(blair, estella)\nnot Shoal(blair, katti)\nShoal(estella, katti)\nLuminesce(estella, katti)\nLuminesce(estella, blair)\nforall x (Noticed(x) -> Luminesce(x, katti))\nforall x (Mortar(x, katti) and Shoal(katti, estella) -> not Shoal(estella, katti))\nforall x (Luminesce(x, katti) -> Shoal(x, katti))\nforall x (Mortar(x, estella) and Unheralded(estella) -> Noticed(estella))\nforall x (Luminesce(x, estella) and Shoal(estella, katti) -> Shoal(x, estella))\nforall x (Cyclonal(x) and not Aberdonian(x) -> Shoal(x, estella))\nforall x (Noticed(x) and Mortar(x, blair) -> Refractile(blair))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) and Noticed(x) -> Mortar(x, blair))\n\nNoticed(estella)\n\nforall x (Mortar(x, estella) and Unheralded(estella) -> Noticed(estella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The tella is funerary. The tella is symmetric. The lynde eyewitness the erma. The lynde does not see the tella. The erma cocainise the tella. The erma mistime the tella. The erma mistime the lynde. If something is symmetric then it mistime the tella. If something eyewitness the tella and the tella cocainise the erma then the erma does not see the tella. If something mistime the tella then it cocainise the tella. If something eyewitness the erma and the erma is considered then the erma is symmetric. If something mistime the erma and the erma cocainise the tella then it cocainise the erma. If something is tapering and not funerary then it cocainise the erma. If something is symmetric and it eyewitness the lynde then the lynde is unfamiliar. If something is funerary and symmetric then it eyewitness the lynde. The lynde does not see the erma.", "logic": "\nFunerary(tella)\nSymmetric(tella)\nEyewitness(lynde, erma)\nnot Cocainise(lynde, tella)\nCocainise(erma, tella)\nMistime(erma, tella)\nMistime(erma, lynde)\nforall x (Symmetric(x) -> Mistime(x, tella))\nforall x (Eyewitness(x, tella) and Cocainise(tella, erma) -> not Cocainise(erma, tella))\nforall x (Mistime(x, tella) -> Cocainise(x, tella))\nforall x (Eyewitness(x, erma) and Considered(erma) -> Symmetric(erma))\nforall x (Mistime(x, erma) and Cocainise(erma, tella) -> Cocainise(x, erma))\nforall x (Tapering(x) and not Funerary(x) -> Cocainise(x, erma))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and Eyewitness(x, lynde) -> Unfamiliar(lynde))\nforall x (Funerary(x) and Symmetric(x) -> Eyewitness(x, lynde))\n\nnot Cocainise(lynde, erma)\n\nforall x (Mistime(x, erma) and Cocainise(erma, tella) -> Cocainise(x, erma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The brier is runcinate. The brier is unsaddled. The erastus equip the krysta. The erastus does not see the brier. The krysta burglarise the brier. The krysta absorb the brier. The krysta absorb the erastus. If something is unsaddled then it absorb the brier. If something equip the brier and the brier burglarise the krysta then the krysta does not see the brier. If something absorb the brier then it burglarise the brier. If something equip the krysta and the krysta is unerasable then the krysta is unsaddled. If something absorb the krysta and the krysta burglarise the brier then it burglarise the krysta. If something is undue and not runcinate then it burglarise the krysta. If something is unsaddled and it equip the erastus then the erastus is cultivable. If something is runcinate and unsaddled then it equip the erastus. The krysta is undue.", "logic": "\nRuncinate(brier)\nUnsaddled(brier)\nEquip(erastus, krysta)\nnot Burglarise(erastus, brier)\nBurglarise(krysta, brier)\nAbsorb(krysta, brier)\nAbsorb(krysta, erastus)\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Absorb(x, brier))\nforall x (Equip(x, brier) and Burglarise(brier, krysta) -> not Burglarise(krysta, brier))\nforall x (Absorb(x, brier) -> Burglarise(x, brier))\nforall x (Equip(x, krysta) and Unerasable(krysta) -> Unsaddled(krysta))\nforall x (Absorb(x, krysta) and Burglarise(krysta, brier) -> Burglarise(x, krysta))\nforall x (Undue(x) and not Runcinate(x) -> Burglarise(x, krysta))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) and Equip(x, erastus) -> Cultivable(erastus))\nforall x (Runcinate(x) and Unsaddled(x) -> Equip(x, erastus))\n\nUndue(krysta)\n\nUndue(krysta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The anita is buccal. The anita is hobnailed. The suellen request the arline. The suellen does not see the anita. The arline tamp the anita. The arline kneecap the anita. The arline kneecap the suellen. If something is hobnailed then it kneecap the anita. If something request the anita and the anita tamp the arline then the arline does not see the anita. If something kneecap the anita then it tamp the anita. If something request the arline and the arline is broadloom then the arline is hobnailed. If something kneecap the arline and the arline tamp the anita then it tamp the arline. If something is ambagious and not buccal then it tamp the arline. If something is hobnailed and it request the suellen then the suellen is pyrrhic. If something is buccal and hobnailed then it request the suellen. The anita does not see the suellen.", "logic": "\nBuccal(anita)\nHobnailed(anita)\nRequest(suellen, arline)\nnot Tamp(suellen, anita)\nTamp(arline, anita)\nKneecap(arline, anita)\nKneecap(arline, suellen)\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) -> Kneecap(x, anita))\nforall x (Request(x, anita) and Tamp(anita, arline) -> not Tamp(arline, anita))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, anita) -> Tamp(x, anita))\nforall x (Request(x, arline) and Broadloom(arline) -> Hobnailed(arline))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, arline) and Tamp(arline, anita) -> Tamp(x, arline))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) and not Buccal(x) -> Tamp(x, arline))\nforall x (Hobnailed(x) and Request(x, suellen) -> Pyrrhic(suellen))\nforall x (Buccal(x) and Hobnailed(x) -> Request(x, suellen))\n\nnot Tamp(anita, suellen)\n\nnot Tamp(anita, suellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "The clint is shitless. The clint is xliii. The marieann bombard the aloysius. The marieann does not see the clint. The aloysius amnesty the clint. The aloysius motorise the clint. The aloysius motorise the marieann. If something is xliii then it motorise the clint. If something bombard the clint and the clint amnesty the aloysius then the aloysius does not see the clint. If something motorise the clint then it amnesty the clint. If something bombard the aloysius and the aloysius is applicable then the aloysius is xliii. If something motorise the aloysius and the aloysius amnesty the clint then it amnesty the aloysius. If something is coriaceous and not shitless then it amnesty the aloysius. If something is xliii and it bombard the marieann then the marieann is recreant. If something is shitless and xliii then it bombard the marieann. The aloysius is applicable.", "logic": "\nShitless(clint)\nXliii(clint)\nBombard(marieann, aloysius)\nnot Amnesty(marieann, clint)\nAmnesty(aloysius, clint)\nMotorise(aloysius, clint)\nMotorise(aloysius, marieann)\nforall x (Xliii(x) -> Motorise(x, clint))\nforall x (Bombard(x, clint) and Amnesty(clint, aloysius) -> not Amnesty(aloysius, clint))\nforall x (Motorise(x, clint) -> Amnesty(x, clint))\nforall x (Bombard(x, aloysius) and Applicable(aloysius) -> Xliii(aloysius))\nforall x (Motorise(x, aloysius) and Amnesty(aloysius, clint) -> Amnesty(x, aloysius))\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and not Shitless(x) -> Amnesty(x, aloysius))\nforall x (Xliii(x) and Bombard(x, marieann) -> Recreant(marieann))\nforall x (Shitless(x) and Xliii(x) -> Bombard(x, marieann))\n\nApplicable(aloysius)\n\nApplicable(aloysius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-22"} {"premises": "Thekla is friable. Thekla is undomestic. Thekla is jangly. If Thekla is friable and Thekla is timorese then Thekla is trilingual. Furry people are tartarean. If someone is timorese and not undomestic then they are jangly. Green, tartarean people are jangly. If someone is fiduciary then they are not timorese. Young, undomestic people are timorese. Thekla is friable.", "logic": "\nFriable(thekla)\nUndomestic(thekla)\nJangly(thekla)\nFriable(thekla) and Timorese(thekla) -> Trilingual(thekla)\nforall x (Trilingual(x) -> Tartarean(x))\nforall x (Timorese(x) and not Undomestic(x) -> Jangly(x))\nforall x (Fiduciary(x) and Tartarean(x) -> Jangly(x))\nforall x (Fiduciary(x) -> not Timorese(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) and Undomestic(x) -> Timorese(x))\n\nFriable(thekla)\n\ntherefore Friable(thekla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Felisha is lipophilic. Felisha is leading. Felisha is revelatory. If Felisha is lipophilic and Felisha is precordial then Felisha is taut. Furry people are exanimate. If someone is precordial and not leading then they are revelatory. Green, exanimate people are revelatory. If someone is papist then they are not precordial. Young, leading people are precordial. Felisha is not revelatory.", "logic": "\nLipophilic(felisha)\nLeading(felisha)\nRevelatory(felisha)\nLipophilic(felisha) and Precordial(felisha) -> Taut(felisha)\nforall x (Taut(x) -> Exanimate(x))\nforall x (Precordial(x) and not Leading(x) -> Revelatory(x))\nforall x (Papist(x) and Exanimate(x) -> Revelatory(x))\nforall x (Papist(x) -> not Precordial(x))\nforall x (Revelatory(x) and Leading(x) -> Precordial(x))\n\nnot Revelatory(felisha)\n\ntherefore Revelatory(felisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Delly is rattling. Delly is marmoreal. Delly is equipotent. If Delly is rattling and Delly is costumed then Delly is abhorrent. Furry people are viii. If someone is costumed and not marmoreal then they are equipotent. Green, viii people are equipotent. If someone is discursive then they are not costumed. Young, marmoreal people are costumed. Delly is costumed.", "logic": "\nRattling(delly)\nMarmoreal(delly)\nEquipotent(delly)\nRattling(delly) and Costumed(delly) -> Abhorrent(delly)\nforall x (Abhorrent(x) -> Viii(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) and not Marmoreal(x) -> Equipotent(x))\nforall x (Discursive(x) and Viii(x) -> Equipotent(x))\nforall x (Discursive(x) -> not Costumed(x))\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Marmoreal(x) -> Costumed(x))\n\nCostumed(delly)\n\nEquipotent(delly) and Marmoreal(delly) and forall x (Equipotent(x) and Marmoreal(x) -> Costumed(x)) -> therefore Costumed(delly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Meta is napping. Meta is crocketed. Meta is neuroglial. If Meta is napping and Meta is tufted then Meta is moraceous. Furry people are nonimmune. If someone is tufted and not crocketed then they are neuroglial. Green, nonimmune people are neuroglial. If someone is ramate then they are not tufted. Young, crocketed people are tufted. Meta is not tufted.", "logic": "\nNapping(meta)\nCrocketed(meta)\nNeuroglial(meta)\nNapping(meta) and Tufted(meta) -> Moraceous(meta)\nforall x (Moraceous(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\nforall x (Tufted(x) and not Crocketed(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) and Nonimmune(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Ramate(x) -> not Tufted(x))\nforall x (Neuroglial(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Tufted(x))\n\nnot Tufted(meta)\n\nNeuroglial(meta) and Crocketed(meta) and forall x (Neuroglial(x) and Crocketed(x) -> Tufted(x)) -> therefore Tufted(meta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Giuseppe is vulturous. Giuseppe is moderne. Giuseppe is climatical. If Giuseppe is vulturous and Giuseppe is lacking then Giuseppe is neurologic. Furry people are optative. If someone is lacking and not moderne then they are climatical. Green, optative people are climatical. If someone is opposite then they are not lacking. Young, moderne people are lacking. Giuseppe is neurologic.", "logic": "\nVulturous(giuseppe)\nModerne(giuseppe)\nClimatical(giuseppe)\nVulturous(giuseppe) and Lacking(giuseppe) -> Neurologic(giuseppe)\nforall x (Neurologic(x) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Lacking(x) and not Moderne(x) -> Climatical(x))\nforall x (Opposite(x) and Optative(x) -> Climatical(x))\nforall x (Opposite(x) -> not Lacking(x))\nforall x (Climatical(x) and Moderne(x) -> Lacking(x))\n\nNeurologic(giuseppe)\n\nClimatical(giuseppe) and Moderne(giuseppe) and forall x (Climatical(x) and Moderne(x) -> Lacking(x)) -> therefore Lacking(giuseppe) Vulturous(giuseppe) and Lacking(giuseppe) and Vulturous(giuseppe) and Lacking(giuseppe) -> Neurologic(giuseppe) -> therefore Neurologic(giuseppe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Kassia is chaldean. Kassia is megalithic. Kassia is heralded. If Kassia is chaldean and Kassia is appealing then Kassia is doubtful. Furry people are malarial. If someone is appealing and not megalithic then they are heralded. Green, malarial people are heralded. If someone is immaterial then they are not appealing. Young, megalithic people are appealing. Kassia is not doubtful.", "logic": "\nChaldean(kassia)\nMegalithic(kassia)\nHeralded(kassia)\nChaldean(kassia) and Appealing(kassia) -> Doubtful(kassia)\nforall x (Doubtful(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) and not Megalithic(x) -> Heralded(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Malarial(x) -> Heralded(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> not Appealing(x))\nforall x (Heralded(x) and Megalithic(x) -> Appealing(x))\n\nnot Doubtful(kassia)\n\nHeralded(kassia) and Megalithic(kassia) and forall x (Heralded(x) and Megalithic(x) -> Appealing(x)) -> therefore Appealing(kassia) Chaldean(kassia) and Appealing(kassia) and Chaldean(kassia) and Appealing(kassia) -> Doubtful(kassia) -> therefore Doubtful(kassia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Bryn is squared. Bryn is enate. Bryn is phreatic. If Bryn is squared and Bryn is unsolvable then Bryn is elegiac. Furry people are chylous. If someone is unsolvable and not enate then they are phreatic. Green, chylous people are phreatic. If someone is untrue then they are not unsolvable. Young, enate people are unsolvable. Bryn is chylous.", "logic": "\nSquared(bryn)\nEnate(bryn)\nPhreatic(bryn)\nSquared(bryn) and Unsolvable(bryn) -> Elegiac(bryn)\nforall x (Elegiac(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Unsolvable(x) and not Enate(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Untrue(x) and Chylous(x) -> Phreatic(x))\nforall x (Untrue(x) -> not Unsolvable(x))\nforall x (Phreatic(x) and Enate(x) -> Unsolvable(x))\n\nChylous(bryn)\n\nPhreatic(bryn) and Enate(bryn) and forall x (Phreatic(x) and Enate(x) -> Unsolvable(x)) -> therefore Unsolvable(bryn) Squared(bryn) and Unsolvable(bryn) and Squared(bryn) and Unsolvable(bryn) -> Elegiac(bryn) -> therefore Elegiac(bryn) Elegiac(bryn) and forall x (Elegiac(x) -> Chylous(x)) -> therefore Chylous(bryn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Shana is worthy. Shana is duplex. Shana is gyroscopic. If Shana is worthy and Shana is barebacked then Shana is semiliquid. Furry people are sovereign. If someone is barebacked and not duplex then they are gyroscopic. Green, sovereign people are gyroscopic. If someone is devalued then they are not barebacked. Young, duplex people are barebacked. Shana is not sovereign.", "logic": "\nWorthy(shana)\nDuplex(shana)\nGyroscopic(shana)\nWorthy(shana) and Barebacked(shana) -> Semiliquid(shana)\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Sovereign(x))\nforall x (Barebacked(x) and not Duplex(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Devalued(x) and Sovereign(x) -> Gyroscopic(x))\nforall x (Devalued(x) -> not Barebacked(x))\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) and Duplex(x) -> Barebacked(x))\n\nnot Sovereign(shana)\n\nGyroscopic(shana) and Duplex(shana) and forall x (Gyroscopic(x) and Duplex(x) -> Barebacked(x)) -> therefore Barebacked(shana) Worthy(shana) and Barebacked(shana) and Worthy(shana) and Barebacked(shana) -> Semiliquid(shana) -> therefore Semiliquid(shana) Semiliquid(shana) and forall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Sovereign(x)) -> therefore Sovereign(shana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-795"} {"premises": "Brunella is provisory. Brunella is lapidarian. Brunella is cute. Todd is provisory. Todd is oscitant. Todd is lapidarian. Jacintha is cute. If something is oscitant then it is paschal. Cold things are oscitant. If something is cute and lapidarian then it is tearing. White things are provisory. If something is paschal then it is rarified. Red things are paschal. Brunella is lapidarian.", "logic": "\nProvisory(brunella)\nLapidarian(brunella)\nCute(brunella)\nProvisory(todd)\nOscitant(todd)\nLapidarian(todd)\nCute(jacintha)\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Paschal(x))\nforall x (Provisory(x) -> Oscitant(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) and Lapidarian(x) -> Tearing(x))\nforall x (Cute(x) -> Provisory(x))\nforall x (Paschal(x) -> Rarified(x))\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) -> Paschal(x))\n\nLapidarian(brunella)\n\ntherefore Lapidarian(brunella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Johannah is punitive. Johannah is conjoined. Johannah is hasidic. Hassan is punitive. Hassan is cursed. Hassan is conjoined. Armstrong is hasidic. If something is cursed then it is honied. Cold things are cursed. If something is hasidic and conjoined then it is suspensive. White things are punitive. If something is honied then it is robotic. Red things are honied. Johannah is not hasidic.", "logic": "\nPunitive(johannah)\nConjoined(johannah)\nHasidic(johannah)\nPunitive(hassan)\nCursed(hassan)\nConjoined(hassan)\nHasidic(armstrong)\nforall x (Cursed(x) -> Honied(x))\nforall x (Punitive(x) -> Cursed(x))\nforall x (Hasidic(x) and Conjoined(x) -> Suspensive(x))\nforall x (Hasidic(x) -> Punitive(x))\nforall x (Honied(x) -> Robotic(x))\nforall x (Conjoined(x) -> Honied(x))\n\nnot Hasidic(johannah)\n\ntherefore Hasidic(johannah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Heida is pleonastic. Heida is untilled. Heida is deniable. Marcel is pleonastic. Marcel is monthlong. Marcel is untilled. Seana is deniable. If something is monthlong then it is disorderly. Cold things are monthlong. If something is deniable and untilled then it is deathlike. White things are pleonastic. If something is disorderly then it is cinematic. Red things are disorderly. Marcel is disorderly.", "logic": "\nPleonastic(heida)\nUntilled(heida)\nDeniable(heida)\nPleonastic(marcel)\nMonthlong(marcel)\nUntilled(marcel)\nDeniable(seana)\nforall x (Monthlong(x) -> Disorderly(x))\nforall x (Pleonastic(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) and Untilled(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nforall x (Disorderly(x) -> Cinematic(x))\nforall x (Untilled(x) -> Disorderly(x))\n\nDisorderly(marcel)\n\nMonthlong(marcel) and forall x (Monthlong(x) -> Disorderly(x)) -> therefore Disorderly(marcel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Flynn is livid. Flynn is unlined. Flynn is highland. Brad is livid. Brad is viatical. Brad is unlined. Verla is highland. If something is viatical then it is grumose. Cold things are viatical. If something is highland and unlined then it is smug. White things are livid. If something is grumose then it is situated. Red things are grumose. Brad is not grumose.", "logic": "\nLivid(flynn)\nUnlined(flynn)\nHighland(flynn)\nLivid(brad)\nViatical(brad)\nUnlined(brad)\nHighland(verla)\nforall x (Viatical(x) -> Grumose(x))\nforall x (Livid(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) and Unlined(x) -> Smug(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Livid(x))\nforall x (Grumose(x) -> Situated(x))\nforall x (Unlined(x) -> Grumose(x))\n\nnot Grumose(brad)\n\nViatical(brad) and forall x (Viatical(x) -> Grumose(x)) -> therefore Grumose(brad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Willi is pernickety. Willi is eritrean. Willi is prescribed. Modesty is pernickety. Modesty is atonal. Modesty is eritrean. Rosalia is prescribed. If something is atonal then it is osmotic. Cold things are atonal. If something is prescribed and eritrean then it is abomasal. White things are pernickety. If something is osmotic then it is bountiful. Red things are osmotic. Rosalia is atonal.", "logic": "\nPernickety(willi)\nEritrean(willi)\nPrescribed(willi)\nPernickety(modesty)\nAtonal(modesty)\nEritrean(modesty)\nPrescribed(rosalia)\nforall x (Atonal(x) -> Osmotic(x))\nforall x (Pernickety(x) -> Atonal(x))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and Eritrean(x) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) -> Pernickety(x))\nforall x (Osmotic(x) -> Bountiful(x))\nforall x (Eritrean(x) -> Osmotic(x))\n\nAtonal(rosalia)\n\nPrescribed(rosalia) and forall x (Prescribed(x) -> Pernickety(x)) -> therefore Pernickety(rosalia) Pernickety(rosalia) and forall x (Pernickety(x) -> Atonal(x)) -> therefore Atonal(rosalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Kelila is aeolian. Kelila is superlunar. Kelila is skinnerian. Eben is aeolian. Eben is unconsumed. Eben is superlunar. Aurlie is skinnerian. If something is unconsumed then it is specious. Cold things are unconsumed. If something is skinnerian and superlunar then it is roadless. White things are aeolian. If something is specious then it is proofed. Red things are specious. Kelila is not proofed.", "logic": "\nAeolian(kelila)\nSuperlunar(kelila)\nSkinnerian(kelila)\nAeolian(eben)\nUnconsumed(eben)\nSuperlunar(eben)\nSkinnerian(aurlie)\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) -> Specious(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nforall x (Skinnerian(x) and Superlunar(x) -> Roadless(x))\nforall x (Skinnerian(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Specious(x) -> Proofed(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Specious(x))\n\nnot Proofed(kelila)\n\nSuperlunar(kelila) and forall x (Superlunar(x) -> Specious(x)) -> therefore Specious(kelila) Specious(kelila) and forall x (Specious(x) -> Proofed(x)) -> therefore Proofed(kelila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Kristan is spheroidal. Kristan is beardown. Kristan is fastened. Walton is spheroidal. Walton is ciliary. Walton is beardown. Forster is fastened. If something is ciliary then it is carefree. Cold things are ciliary. If something is fastened and beardown then it is tubed. White things are spheroidal. If something is carefree then it is bounded. Red things are carefree. Forster is carefree.", "logic": "\nSpheroidal(kristan)\nBeardown(kristan)\nFastened(kristan)\nSpheroidal(walton)\nCiliary(walton)\nBeardown(walton)\nFastened(forster)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) -> Carefree(x))\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) -> Ciliary(x))\nforall x (Fastened(x) and Beardown(x) -> Tubed(x))\nforall x (Fastened(x) -> Spheroidal(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Bounded(x))\nforall x (Beardown(x) -> Carefree(x))\n\nCarefree(forster)\n\nFastened(forster) and forall x (Fastened(x) -> Spheroidal(x)) -> therefore Spheroidal(forster) Spheroidal(forster) and forall x (Spheroidal(x) -> Ciliary(x)) -> therefore Ciliary(forster) Ciliary(forster) and forall x (Ciliary(x) -> Carefree(x)) -> therefore Carefree(forster)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Luke is sacked. Luke is unlifelike. Luke is oceangoing. Witty is sacked. Witty is fijian. Witty is unlifelike. Gunvor is oceangoing. If something is fijian then it is panamanian. Cold things are fijian. If something is oceangoing and unlifelike then it is tortious. White things are sacked. If something is panamanian then it is silty. Red things are panamanian. Gunvor is not panamanian.", "logic": "\nSacked(luke)\nUnlifelike(luke)\nOceangoing(luke)\nSacked(witty)\nFijian(witty)\nUnlifelike(witty)\nOceangoing(gunvor)\nforall x (Fijian(x) -> Panamanian(x))\nforall x (Sacked(x) -> Fijian(x))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) and Unlifelike(x) -> Tortious(x))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Sacked(x))\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Silty(x))\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) -> Panamanian(x))\n\nnot Panamanian(gunvor)\n\nOceangoing(gunvor) and forall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Sacked(x)) -> therefore Sacked(gunvor) Sacked(gunvor) and forall x (Sacked(x) -> Fijian(x)) -> therefore Fijian(gunvor) Fijian(gunvor) and forall x (Fijian(x) -> Panamanian(x)) -> therefore Panamanian(gunvor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Harlene is searching. Harlene is fibrous. Harlene is quarterly. Malinda is searching. Malinda is degressive. Malinda is fibrous. Dania is quarterly. If something is degressive then it is frigid. Cold things are degressive. If something is quarterly and fibrous then it is starry. White things are searching. If something is frigid then it is goddamn. Red things are frigid. Dania is not starry.", "logic": "\nSearching(harlene)\nFibrous(harlene)\nQuarterly(harlene)\nSearching(malinda)\nDegressive(malinda)\nFibrous(malinda)\nQuarterly(dania)\nforall x (Degressive(x) -> Frigid(x))\nforall x (Searching(x) -> Degressive(x))\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and Fibrous(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Quarterly(x) -> Searching(x))\nforall x (Frigid(x) -> Goddamn(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) -> Frigid(x))\n\nnot Starry(dania)\n\nforall x (Quarterly(x) and Fibrous(x) -> Starry(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Othella is despiteful. Othella is watered. Othella is ecological. Bertina is despiteful. Bertina is designate. Bertina is watered. Willdon is ecological. If something is designate then it is foggy. Cold things are designate. If something is ecological and watered then it is unforced. White things are despiteful. If something is foggy then it is ellipsoid. Red things are foggy. Bertina is unforced.", "logic": "\nDespiteful(othella)\nWatered(othella)\nEcological(othella)\nDespiteful(bertina)\nDesignate(bertina)\nWatered(bertina)\nEcological(willdon)\nforall x (Designate(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Despiteful(x) -> Designate(x))\nforall x (Ecological(x) and Watered(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Ecological(x) -> Despiteful(x))\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Ellipsoid(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) -> Foggy(x))\n\nUnforced(bertina)\n\nforall x (Ecological(x) and Watered(x) -> Unforced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Ingmar is deferent. Ingmar is mateless. Ingmar is ingrained. Sibella is deferent. Sibella is ocellated. Sibella is mateless. Keelia is ingrained. If something is ocellated then it is documental. Cold things are ocellated. If something is ingrained and mateless then it is undulate. White things are deferent. If something is documental then it is auriferous. Red things are documental. Keelia is not mateless.", "logic": "\nDeferent(ingmar)\nMateless(ingmar)\nIngrained(ingmar)\nDeferent(sibella)\nOcellated(sibella)\nMateless(sibella)\nIngrained(keelia)\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> Documental(x))\nforall x (Deferent(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Ingrained(x) and Mateless(x) -> Undulate(x))\nforall x (Ingrained(x) -> Deferent(x))\nforall x (Documental(x) -> Auriferous(x))\nforall x (Mateless(x) -> Documental(x))\n\nnot Mateless(keelia)\n\nnot Mateless(keelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Gershon is unequipped. Gershon is unowned. Gershon is corbelled. Xena is unequipped. Xena is wedded. Xena is unowned. Trever is corbelled. If something is wedded then it is supporting. Cold things are wedded. If something is corbelled and unowned then it is thirsty. White things are unequipped. If something is supporting then it is empyrean. Red things are supporting. Xena is corbelled.", "logic": "\nUnequipped(gershon)\nUnowned(gershon)\nCorbelled(gershon)\nUnequipped(xena)\nWedded(xena)\nUnowned(xena)\nCorbelled(trever)\nforall x (Wedded(x) -> Supporting(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Wedded(x))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) and Unowned(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Corbelled(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Supporting(x) -> Empyrean(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) -> Supporting(x))\n\nCorbelled(xena)\n\nCorbelled(xena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1442"} {"premises": "Elna is forested. Herschel is stunning. Tiffani is algonkian. Marcile is supporting. Red people are utterable. Marcile is supporting.", "logic": "\nForested(elna)\nStunning(herschel)\nAlgonkian(tiffani)\nSupporting(marcile)\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Utterable(x))\n\nSupporting(marcile)\n\ntherefore Supporting(marcile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Nertie is mutualist. Lynsey is rhetorical. Sigfrid is revealing. Marjy is croaky. Red people are onstage. Lynsey is not rhetorical.", "logic": "\nMutualist(nertie)\nRhetorical(lynsey)\nRevealing(sigfrid)\nCroaky(marjy)\nforall x (Rhetorical(x) -> Onstage(x))\n\nnot Rhetorical(lynsey)\n\ntherefore Rhetorical(lynsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Brita is qabalistic. Arlana is whiney. Farrah is finnish. Rahul is arcane. Red people are hedonistic. Arlana is hedonistic.", "logic": "\nQabalistic(brita)\nWhiney(arlana)\nFinnish(farrah)\nArcane(rahul)\nforall x (Whiney(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\n\nHedonistic(arlana)\n\nWhiney(arlana) and forall x (Whiney(x) -> Hedonistic(x)) -> therefore Hedonistic(arlana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Clyde is occlusive. Margalo is binary. Abigale is astrocytic. Kendal is faint. Red people are quechuan. Margalo is not quechuan.", "logic": "\nOcclusive(clyde)\nBinary(margalo)\nAstrocytic(abigale)\nFaint(kendal)\nforall x (Binary(x) -> Quechuan(x))\n\nnot Quechuan(margalo)\n\nBinary(margalo) and forall x (Binary(x) -> Quechuan(x)) -> therefore Quechuan(margalo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Junia is amoeban. Abbey is sleek. Cristin is agonadal. Bay is flawed. Red people are errorless. Junia is not errorless.", "logic": "\nAmoeban(junia)\nSleek(abbey)\nAgonadal(cristin)\nFlawed(bay)\nforall x (Sleek(x) -> Errorless(x))\n\nnot Errorless(junia)\n\nforall x (Sleek(x) -> Errorless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Liam is outflowing. Marsh is kitschy. Ree is enmeshed. Harald is preeminent. Red people are projectile. Ree is projectile.", "logic": "\nOutflowing(liam)\nKitschy(marsh)\nEnmeshed(ree)\nPreeminent(harald)\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Projectile(x))\n\nProjectile(ree)\n\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Projectile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Darell is bunglesome. Zolly is asquint. Meggie is interbred. Wendeline is unprompted. Red people are intense. Darell is not blue.", "logic": "\nBunglesome(darell)\nAsquint(zolly)\nInterbred(meggie)\nUnprompted(wendeline)\nforall x (Asquint(x) -> Intense(x))\n\nnot Blue(darell)\n\nnot Blue(darell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Rochelle is katabolic. Ruthann is believable. Hannibal is uttered. Cameo is ethnologic. Red people are devoted. Hannibal is ethnologic.", "logic": "\nKatabolic(rochelle)\nBelievable(ruthann)\nUttered(hannibal)\nEthnologic(cameo)\nforall x (Believable(x) -> Devoted(x))\n\nEthnologic(hannibal)\n\nEthnologic(hannibal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Laurette is dwarfish. Laurette is confirming. Laurette is not improper. Laurette is seeded. Laurette is rarefied. Laurette is scalelike. Arron is dwarfish. Arron is rarefied. Hashim is dwarfish. Hashim is not confirming. Hashim is improper. Hashim is not seeded. Farand is dwarfish. Farand is improper. Farand is scalelike. Farand is impotent. All impotent things are seeded. Laurette is confirming.", "logic": "\nDwarfish(laurette)\nConfirming(laurette)\nnot Improper(laurette)\nSeeded(laurette)\nRarefied(laurette)\nScalelike(laurette)\nDwarfish(arron)\nRarefied(arron)\nDwarfish(hashim)\nnot Confirming(hashim)\nImproper(hashim)\nnot Seeded(hashim)\nDwarfish(farand)\nImproper(farand)\nScalelike(farand)\nImpotent(farand)\nforall x (Impotent(x) -> Seeded(x))\n\nConfirming(laurette)\n\ntherefore Confirming(laurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Inger is unwonted. Inger is dished. Inger is not capable. Inger is phrasal. Inger is chance. Inger is spikelike. Vernor is unwonted. Vernor is chance. Viviana is unwonted. Viviana is not dished. Viviana is capable. Viviana is not phrasal. Layne is unwonted. Layne is capable. Layne is spikelike. Layne is uttermost. All uttermost things are phrasal. Layne is not unwonted.", "logic": "\nUnwonted(inger)\nDished(inger)\nnot Capable(inger)\nPhrasal(inger)\nChance(inger)\nSpikelike(inger)\nUnwonted(vernor)\nChance(vernor)\nUnwonted(viviana)\nnot Dished(viviana)\nCapable(viviana)\nnot Phrasal(viviana)\nUnwonted(layne)\nCapable(layne)\nSpikelike(layne)\nUttermost(layne)\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Phrasal(x))\n\nnot Unwonted(layne)\n\ntherefore Unwonted(layne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Cherey is converted. Cherey is verbalised. Cherey is not divisional. Cherey is annalistic. Cherey is thickset. Cherey is unwritten. Dominique is converted. Dominique is thickset. Stacia is converted. Stacia is not verbalised. Stacia is divisional. Stacia is not annalistic. Tiebout is converted. Tiebout is divisional. Tiebout is unwritten. Tiebout is coral. All coral things are annalistic. Tiebout is annalistic.", "logic": "\nConverted(cherey)\nVerbalised(cherey)\nnot Divisional(cherey)\nAnnalistic(cherey)\nThickset(cherey)\nUnwritten(cherey)\nConverted(dominique)\nThickset(dominique)\nConverted(stacia)\nnot Verbalised(stacia)\nDivisional(stacia)\nnot Annalistic(stacia)\nConverted(tiebout)\nDivisional(tiebout)\nUnwritten(tiebout)\nCoral(tiebout)\nforall x (Coral(x) -> Annalistic(x))\n\nAnnalistic(tiebout)\n\nCoral(tiebout) and forall x (Coral(x) -> Annalistic(x)) -> therefore Annalistic(tiebout)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Theresita is persisting. Theresita is unlimited. Theresita is not bared. Theresita is epilithic. Theresita is germane. Theresita is abused. Jaime is persisting. Jaime is germane. Jacki is persisting. Jacki is not unlimited. Jacki is bared. Jacki is not epilithic. Trista is persisting. Trista is bared. Trista is abused. Trista is botulinal. All botulinal things are epilithic. Trista is not epilithic.", "logic": "\nPersisting(theresita)\nUnlimited(theresita)\nnot Bared(theresita)\nEpilithic(theresita)\nGermane(theresita)\nAbused(theresita)\nPersisting(jaime)\nGermane(jaime)\nPersisting(jacki)\nnot Unlimited(jacki)\nBared(jacki)\nnot Epilithic(jacki)\nPersisting(trista)\nBared(trista)\nAbused(trista)\nBotulinal(trista)\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Epilithic(x))\n\nnot Epilithic(trista)\n\nBotulinal(trista) and forall x (Botulinal(x) -> Epilithic(x)) -> therefore Epilithic(trista)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Vickie is mighty. Vickie is decussate. Vickie is not glaring. Vickie is illusory. Vickie is sebaceous. Vickie is nineteenth. Caro is mighty. Caro is sebaceous. Ettie is mighty. Ettie is not decussate. Ettie is glaring. Ettie is not illusory. Binny is mighty. Binny is glaring. Binny is nineteenth. Binny is umber. All umber things are illusory. Caro is not illusory.", "logic": "\nMighty(vickie)\nDecussate(vickie)\nnot Glaring(vickie)\nIllusory(vickie)\nSebaceous(vickie)\nNineteenth(vickie)\nMighty(caro)\nSebaceous(caro)\nMighty(ettie)\nnot Decussate(ettie)\nGlaring(ettie)\nnot Illusory(ettie)\nMighty(binny)\nGlaring(binny)\nNineteenth(binny)\nUmber(binny)\nforall x (Umber(x) -> Illusory(x))\n\nnot Illusory(caro)\n\nforall x (Umber(x) -> Illusory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Willi is dyspeptic. Willi is soigne. Willi is not chance. Willi is burled. Willi is dovish. Willi is private. Delia is dyspeptic. Delia is dovish. Danelle is dyspeptic. Danelle is not soigne. Danelle is chance. Danelle is not burled. Kristina is dyspeptic. Kristina is chance. Kristina is private. Kristina is musty. All musty things are burled. Delia is musty.", "logic": "\nDyspeptic(willi)\nSoigne(willi)\nnot Chance(willi)\nBurled(willi)\nDovish(willi)\nPrivate(willi)\nDyspeptic(delia)\nDovish(delia)\nDyspeptic(danelle)\nnot Soigne(danelle)\nChance(danelle)\nnot Burled(danelle)\nDyspeptic(kristina)\nChance(kristina)\nPrivate(kristina)\nMusty(kristina)\nforall x (Musty(x) -> Burled(x))\n\nMusty(delia)\n\nMusty(delia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Mervin is epimorphic. Mervin is variegated. Mervin is not celestial. Mervin is hexed. Mervin is stimulated. Mervin is insured. Connie is epimorphic. Connie is stimulated. Lemmy is epimorphic. Lemmy is not variegated. Lemmy is celestial. Lemmy is not hexed. Jeffery is epimorphic. Jeffery is celestial. Jeffery is insured. Jeffery is hyperbolic. All hyperbolic things are hexed. Connie is not celestial.", "logic": "\nEpimorphic(mervin)\nVariegated(mervin)\nnot Celestial(mervin)\nHexed(mervin)\nStimulated(mervin)\nInsured(mervin)\nEpimorphic(connie)\nStimulated(connie)\nEpimorphic(lemmy)\nnot Variegated(lemmy)\nCelestial(lemmy)\nnot Hexed(lemmy)\nEpimorphic(jeffery)\nCelestial(jeffery)\nInsured(jeffery)\nHyperbolic(jeffery)\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) -> Hexed(x))\n\nnot Celestial(connie)\n\nnot Celestial(connie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Doralia is fossilised. Doralia is egregious. Doralia is not slipping. Doralia is unembodied. Doralia is rickety. Doralia is inquiring. Korrie is fossilised. Korrie is rickety. Mattheus is fossilised. Mattheus is not egregious. Mattheus is slipping. Mattheus is not unembodied. Veriee is fossilised. Veriee is slipping. Veriee is inquiring. Veriee is haploid. All haploid things are unembodied. Korrie is inquiring.", "logic": "\nFossilised(doralia)\nEgregious(doralia)\nnot Slipping(doralia)\nUnembodied(doralia)\nRickety(doralia)\nInquiring(doralia)\nFossilised(korrie)\nRickety(korrie)\nFossilised(mattheus)\nnot Egregious(mattheus)\nSlipping(mattheus)\nnot Unembodied(mattheus)\nFossilised(veriee)\nSlipping(veriee)\nInquiring(veriee)\nHaploid(veriee)\nforall x (Haploid(x) -> Unembodied(x))\n\nInquiring(korrie)\n\nInquiring(korrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1958"} {"premises": "Fania is codified. Verge is noiseless. Parwane is garmented. Lolita is juxtaposed. All exemplary people are legato. If someone is noiseless then they are legato. If someone is blimpish then they are juxtaposed. If someone is juxtaposed then they are legato. All noiseless people are exemplary. All codified people are noiseless. If Verge is exemplary and Verge is legato then Verge is codified. All exemplary people are garmented. Verge is noiseless.", "logic": "\nCodified(fania)\nNoiseless(verge)\nGarmented(parwane)\nJuxtaposed(lolita)\nforall x (Exemplary(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Noiseless(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Blimpish(x) -> Juxtaposed(x))\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Noiseless(x) -> Exemplary(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Noiseless(x))\nExemplary(verge) and Legato(verge) -> Codified(verge)\nforall x (Exemplary(x) -> Garmented(x))\n\nNoiseless(verge)\n\ntherefore Noiseless(verge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Karina is scoured. Goose is urbanized. Parke is sikh. Marilyn is pennate. All asternal people are acquitted. If someone is urbanized then they are acquitted. If someone is oleaginous then they are pennate. If someone is pennate then they are acquitted. All urbanized people are asternal. All scoured people are urbanized. If Goose is asternal and Goose is acquitted then Goose is scoured. All asternal people are sikh. Karina is not scoured.", "logic": "\nScoured(karina)\nUrbanized(goose)\nSikh(parke)\nPennate(marilyn)\nforall x (Asternal(x) -> Acquitted(x))\nforall x (Urbanized(x) -> Acquitted(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Pennate(x))\nforall x (Pennate(x) -> Acquitted(x))\nforall x (Urbanized(x) -> Asternal(x))\nforall x (Scoured(x) -> Urbanized(x))\nAsternal(goose) and Acquitted(goose) -> Scoured(goose)\nforall x (Asternal(x) -> Sikh(x))\n\nnot Scoured(karina)\n\ntherefore Scoured(karina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Martainn is cadaveric. Sunny is thinking. Bay is seeming. Susanna is semiarid. All explicable people are diluvian. If someone is thinking then they are diluvian. If someone is divers then they are semiarid. If someone is semiarid then they are diluvian. All thinking people are explicable. All cadaveric people are thinking. If Sunny is explicable and Sunny is diluvian then Sunny is cadaveric. All explicable people are seeming. Susanna is diluvian.", "logic": "\nCadaveric(martainn)\nThinking(sunny)\nSeeming(bay)\nSemiarid(susanna)\nforall x (Explicable(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Thinking(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Divers(x) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Thinking(x) -> Explicable(x))\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) -> Thinking(x))\nExplicable(sunny) and Diluvian(sunny) -> Cadaveric(sunny)\nforall x (Explicable(x) -> Seeming(x))\n\nDiluvian(susanna)\n\nSemiarid(susanna) and forall x (Semiarid(x) -> Diluvian(x)) -> therefore Diluvian(susanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Ketti is allied. Andrew is yugoslav. Avis is prolific. Florinda is pockmarked. All fabulous people are curvey. If someone is yugoslav then they are curvey. If someone is infirm then they are pockmarked. If someone is pockmarked then they are curvey. All yugoslav people are fabulous. All allied people are yugoslav. If Andrew is fabulous and Andrew is curvey then Andrew is allied. All fabulous people are prolific. Andrew is not fabulous.", "logic": "\nAllied(ketti)\nYugoslav(andrew)\nProlific(avis)\nPockmarked(florinda)\nforall x (Fabulous(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Infirm(x) -> Pockmarked(x))\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) -> Curvey(x))\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Allied(x) -> Yugoslav(x))\nFabulous(andrew) and Curvey(andrew) -> Allied(andrew)\nforall x (Fabulous(x) -> Prolific(x))\n\nnot Fabulous(andrew)\n\nYugoslav(andrew) and forall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Fabulous(x)) -> therefore Fabulous(andrew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Kerri is elfish. Tatiana is albitic. Shanda is gargantuan. Winifield is etiolate. All annelidan people are savorless. If someone is albitic then they are savorless. If someone is cautionary then they are etiolate. If someone is etiolate then they are savorless. All albitic people are annelidan. All elfish people are albitic. If Tatiana is annelidan and Tatiana is savorless then Tatiana is elfish. All annelidan people are gargantuan. Kerri is savorless.", "logic": "\nElfish(kerri)\nAlbitic(tatiana)\nGargantuan(shanda)\nEtiolate(winifield)\nforall x (Annelidan(x) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Albitic(x) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Cautionary(x) -> Etiolate(x))\nforall x (Etiolate(x) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Albitic(x) -> Annelidan(x))\nforall x (Elfish(x) -> Albitic(x))\nAnnelidan(tatiana) and Savorless(tatiana) -> Elfish(tatiana)\nforall x (Annelidan(x) -> Gargantuan(x))\n\nSavorless(kerri)\n\nElfish(kerri) and forall x (Elfish(x) -> Albitic(x)) -> therefore Albitic(kerri) Albitic(kerri) and forall x (Albitic(x) -> Savorless(x)) -> therefore Savorless(kerri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Murial is scopal. Ardenia is male. Anastasie is untipped. Inesita is georgian. All patient people are learned. If someone is male then they are learned. If someone is ellipsoid then they are georgian. If someone is georgian then they are learned. All male people are patient. All scopal people are male. If Ardenia is patient and Ardenia is learned then Ardenia is scopal. All patient people are untipped. Murial is not patient.", "logic": "\nScopal(murial)\nMale(ardenia)\nUntipped(anastasie)\nGeorgian(inesita)\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Male(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) -> Georgian(x))\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Male(x) -> Patient(x))\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> Male(x))\nPatient(ardenia) and Learned(ardenia) -> Scopal(ardenia)\nforall x (Patient(x) -> Untipped(x))\n\nnot Patient(murial)\n\nScopal(murial) and forall x (Scopal(x) -> Male(x)) -> therefore Male(murial) Male(murial) and forall x (Male(x) -> Patient(x)) -> therefore Patient(murial)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Adore is tapered. Shamit is carmine. Morly is mucky. Wake is luxuriant. All phenomenal people are suspect. If someone is carmine then they are suspect. If someone is veritable then they are luxuriant. If someone is luxuriant then they are suspect. All carmine people are phenomenal. All tapered people are carmine. If Shamit is phenomenal and Shamit is suspect then Shamit is tapered. All phenomenal people are mucky. Adore is mucky.", "logic": "\nTapered(adore)\nCarmine(shamit)\nMucky(morly)\nLuxuriant(wake)\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Suspect(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> Suspect(x))\nforall x (Veritable(x) -> Luxuriant(x))\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) -> Suspect(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> Phenomenal(x))\nforall x (Tapered(x) -> Carmine(x))\nPhenomenal(shamit) and Suspect(shamit) -> Tapered(shamit)\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Mucky(x))\n\nMucky(adore)\n\nTapered(adore) and forall x (Tapered(x) -> Carmine(x)) -> therefore Carmine(adore) Carmine(adore) and forall x (Carmine(x) -> Phenomenal(x)) -> therefore Phenomenal(adore) Phenomenal(adore) and forall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Mucky(x)) -> therefore Mucky(adore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Annmarie is earthborn. Keeley is monoclinic. Sib is planted. Sophi is extralegal. All trimmed people are estrogenic. If someone is monoclinic then they are estrogenic. If someone is shared then they are extralegal. If someone is extralegal then they are estrogenic. All monoclinic people are trimmed. All earthborn people are monoclinic. If Keeley is trimmed and Keeley is estrogenic then Keeley is earthborn. All trimmed people are planted. Annmarie is not planted.", "logic": "\nEarthborn(annmarie)\nMonoclinic(keeley)\nPlanted(sib)\nExtralegal(sophi)\nforall x (Trimmed(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) -> Extralegal(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) -> Trimmed(x))\nforall x (Earthborn(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nTrimmed(keeley) and Estrogenic(keeley) -> Earthborn(keeley)\nforall x (Trimmed(x) -> Planted(x))\n\nnot Planted(annmarie)\n\nEarthborn(annmarie) and forall x (Earthborn(x) -> Monoclinic(x)) -> therefore Monoclinic(annmarie) Monoclinic(annmarie) and forall x (Monoclinic(x) -> Trimmed(x)) -> therefore Trimmed(annmarie) Trimmed(annmarie) and forall x (Trimmed(x) -> Planted(x)) -> therefore Planted(annmarie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Peri is provisory. Shelagh is overfed. Cornelia is gibelike. Raphael is allogamous. All great people are steep. If someone is overfed then they are steep. If someone is nonsexual then they are allogamous. If someone is allogamous then they are steep. All overfed people are great. All provisory people are overfed. If Shelagh is great and Shelagh is steep then Shelagh is provisory. All great people are gibelike. Cornelia is not overfed.", "logic": "\nProvisory(peri)\nOverfed(shelagh)\nGibelike(cornelia)\nAllogamous(raphael)\nforall x (Great(x) -> Steep(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) -> Steep(x))\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nforall x (Allogamous(x) -> Steep(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) -> Great(x))\nforall x (Provisory(x) -> Overfed(x))\nGreat(shelagh) and Steep(shelagh) -> Provisory(shelagh)\nforall x (Great(x) -> Gibelike(x))\n\nnot Overfed(cornelia)\n\nforall x (Provisory(x) -> Overfed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Chelton is slowgoing. Kaycee is lumpish. Zarla is murdered. Nels is tremendous. All steady people are biomedical. If someone is lumpish then they are biomedical. If someone is cordial then they are tremendous. If someone is tremendous then they are biomedical. All lumpish people are steady. All slowgoing people are lumpish. If Kaycee is steady and Kaycee is biomedical then Kaycee is slowgoing. All steady people are murdered. Zarla is tremendous.", "logic": "\nSlowgoing(chelton)\nLumpish(kaycee)\nMurdered(zarla)\nTremendous(nels)\nforall x (Steady(x) -> Biomedical(x))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Biomedical(x))\nforall x (Cordial(x) -> Tremendous(x))\nforall x (Tremendous(x) -> Biomedical(x))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Steady(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nSteady(kaycee) and Biomedical(kaycee) -> Slowgoing(kaycee)\nforall x (Steady(x) -> Murdered(x))\n\nTremendous(zarla)\n\nforall x (Cordial(x) -> Tremendous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Sharron is pituitary. Quintus is brumal. Charlotte is robust. Rea is venturous. All fuzzed people are topping. If someone is brumal then they are topping. If someone is downstairs then they are venturous. If someone is venturous then they are topping. All brumal people are fuzzed. All pituitary people are brumal. If Quintus is fuzzed and Quintus is topping then Quintus is pituitary. All fuzzed people are robust. Rea is not robust.", "logic": "\nPituitary(sharron)\nBrumal(quintus)\nRobust(charlotte)\nVenturous(rea)\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Topping(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Topping(x))\nforall x (Downstairs(x) -> Venturous(x))\nforall x (Venturous(x) -> Topping(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) -> Brumal(x))\nFuzzed(quintus) and Topping(quintus) -> Pituitary(quintus)\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Robust(x))\n\nnot Robust(rea)\n\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Robust(x)) <- forall x (Brumal(x) -> Fuzzed(x)) <- forall x (Pituitary(x) -> Brumal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Vasili is panicked. Dyson is microsomal. Kass is nipponese. Ethelda is vaporized. All impendent people are hypnogogic. If someone is microsomal then they are hypnogogic. If someone is wearing then they are vaporized. If someone is vaporized then they are hypnogogic. All microsomal people are impendent. All panicked people are microsomal. If Dyson is impendent and Dyson is hypnogogic then Dyson is panicked. All impendent people are nipponese. Vasili is vaporized.", "logic": "\nPanicked(vasili)\nMicrosomal(dyson)\nNipponese(kass)\nVaporized(ethelda)\nforall x (Impendent(x) -> Hypnogogic(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Hypnogogic(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) -> Vaporized(x))\nforall x (Vaporized(x) -> Hypnogogic(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Impendent(x))\nforall x (Panicked(x) -> Microsomal(x))\nImpendent(dyson) and Hypnogogic(dyson) -> Panicked(dyson)\nforall x (Impendent(x) -> Nipponese(x))\n\nVaporized(vasili)\n\nforall x (Wearing(x) -> Vaporized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Maxy is composite. Jess is emotive. Catlaina is sabahan. Barty is flashy. All exergonic people are pelvic. If someone is emotive then they are pelvic. If someone is fair then they are flashy. If someone is flashy then they are pelvic. All emotive people are exergonic. All composite people are emotive. If Jess is exergonic and Jess is pelvic then Jess is composite. All exergonic people are sabahan. Barty is not fair.", "logic": "\nComposite(maxy)\nEmotive(jess)\nSabahan(catlaina)\nFlashy(barty)\nforall x (Exergonic(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Emotive(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Fair(x) -> Flashy(x))\nforall x (Flashy(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Emotive(x) -> Exergonic(x))\nforall x (Composite(x) -> Emotive(x))\nExergonic(jess) and Pelvic(jess) -> Composite(jess)\nforall x (Exergonic(x) -> Sabahan(x))\n\nnot Fair(barty)\n\nnot Fair(barty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Roselia is stillborn. Mildred is victimized. Georgena is pensive. Novelia is bivariate. All seasonal people are puppylike. If someone is victimized then they are puppylike. If someone is sufferable then they are bivariate. If someone is bivariate then they are puppylike. All victimized people are seasonal. All stillborn people are victimized. If Mildred is seasonal and Mildred is puppylike then Mildred is stillborn. All seasonal people are pensive. Georgena is stillborn.", "logic": "\nStillborn(roselia)\nVictimized(mildred)\nPensive(georgena)\nBivariate(novelia)\nforall x (Seasonal(x) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Victimized(x) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Sufferable(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nforall x (Bivariate(x) -> Puppylike(x))\nforall x (Victimized(x) -> Seasonal(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Victimized(x))\nSeasonal(mildred) and Puppylike(mildred) -> Stillborn(mildred)\nforall x (Seasonal(x) -> Pensive(x))\n\nStillborn(georgena)\n\nStillborn(georgena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Vaughan is coveted. Udale is subclavian. Neile is ripping. Adriaens is recyclable. All capable people are unstylish. If someone is subclavian then they are unstylish. If someone is unmerited then they are recyclable. If someone is recyclable then they are unstylish. All subclavian people are capable. All coveted people are subclavian. If Udale is capable and Udale is unstylish then Udale is coveted. All capable people are ripping. Neile is not unmerited.", "logic": "\nCoveted(vaughan)\nSubclavian(udale)\nRipping(neile)\nRecyclable(adriaens)\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Unmerited(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Subclavian(x) -> Capable(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) -> Subclavian(x))\nCapable(udale) and Unstylish(udale) -> Coveted(udale)\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Ripping(x))\n\nnot Unmerited(neile)\n\nnot Unmerited(neile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "Ardith is pantropic. Chalmers is cheeky. Dollie is planetary. Carlotta is antitrust. All nagging people are heathen. If someone is cheeky then they are heathen. If someone is hooved then they are antitrust. If someone is antitrust then they are heathen. All cheeky people are nagging. All pantropic people are cheeky. If Chalmers is nagging and Chalmers is heathen then Chalmers is pantropic. All nagging people are planetary. Ardith is hooved.", "logic": "\nPantropic(ardith)\nCheeky(chalmers)\nPlanetary(dollie)\nAntitrust(carlotta)\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Heathen(x))\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> Heathen(x))\nforall x (Hooved(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nforall x (Antitrust(x) -> Heathen(x))\nforall x (Cheeky(x) -> Nagging(x))\nforall x (Pantropic(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nNagging(chalmers) and Heathen(chalmers) -> Pantropic(chalmers)\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Planetary(x))\n\nHooved(ardith)\n\nHooved(ardith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-863"} {"premises": "The graig thrum the indira. The graig is strangled. The graig is deterrent. The graig is nutty. The graig dash the indira. The graig relapse the indira. The indira thrum the graig. The indira is denotive. The indira dash the graig. The indira relapse the graig. If someone dash the indira then they are nutty. If someone is strangled then they visit the graig. If someone thrum the graig and the graig is denotive then they visit the indira. If someone thrum the indira and they chase the graig then they see the indira. If someone thrum the graig then they chase the indira. If someone is deterrent and they visit the indira then the indira relapse the graig. The graig is deterrent.", "logic": "\nThrum(graig, indira)\nStrangled(graig)\nDeterrent(graig)\nNutty(graig)\nDash(graig, indira)\nRelapse(graig, indira)\nThrum(indira, graig)\nDenotive(indira)\nDash(indira, graig)\nRelapse(indira, graig)\nforall x (Dash(x, indira) -> Nutty(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> Relapse(x, graig))\nforall x (Thrum(x, graig) and Denotive(graig) -> Relapse(x, indira))\nforall x (Thrum(x, indira) and Thrum(x, graig) -> Dash(x, indira))\nforall x (Thrum(x, graig) -> Thrum(x, indira))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and Relapse(x, indira) -> Relapse(indira, graig))\n\nDeterrent(graig)\n\ntherefore Deterrent(graig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The ursala dice the toma. The ursala is carbuncled. The ursala is entranced. The ursala is planless. The ursala rumple the toma. The ursala muddle the toma. The toma dice the ursala. The toma is repand. The toma rumple the ursala. The toma muddle the ursala. If someone rumple the toma then they are planless. If someone is carbuncled then they visit the ursala. If someone dice the ursala and the ursala is repand then they visit the toma. If someone dice the toma and they chase the ursala then they see the toma. If someone dice the ursala then they chase the toma. If someone is entranced and they visit the toma then the toma muddle the ursala. The ursala does not visit the toma.", "logic": "\nDice(ursala, toma)\nCarbuncled(ursala)\nEntranced(ursala)\nPlanless(ursala)\nRumple(ursala, toma)\nMuddle(ursala, toma)\nDice(toma, ursala)\nRepand(toma)\nRumple(toma, ursala)\nMuddle(toma, ursala)\nforall x (Rumple(x, toma) -> Planless(x))\nforall x (Carbuncled(x) -> Muddle(x, ursala))\nforall x (Dice(x, ursala) and Repand(ursala) -> Muddle(x, toma))\nforall x (Dice(x, toma) and Dice(x, ursala) -> Rumple(x, toma))\nforall x (Dice(x, ursala) -> Dice(x, toma))\nforall x (Entranced(x) and Muddle(x, toma) -> Muddle(toma, ursala))\n\nnot Muddle(ursala, toma)\n\ntherefore Muddle(ursala, toma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The tallie inactivate the hellene. The tallie is goofy. The tallie is exclusive. The tallie is diverted. The tallie subsume the hellene. The tallie resuspend the hellene. The hellene inactivate the tallie. The hellene is lendable. The hellene subsume the tallie. The hellene resuspend the tallie. If someone subsume the hellene then they are diverted. If someone is goofy then they visit the tallie. If someone inactivate the tallie and the tallie is lendable then they visit the hellene. If someone inactivate the hellene and they chase the tallie then they see the hellene. If someone inactivate the tallie then they chase the hellene. If someone is exclusive and they visit the hellene then the hellene resuspend the tallie. The hellene inactivate the hellene.", "logic": "\nInactivate(tallie, hellene)\nGoofy(tallie)\nExclusive(tallie)\nDiverted(tallie)\nSubsume(tallie, hellene)\nResuspend(tallie, hellene)\nInactivate(hellene, tallie)\nLendable(hellene)\nSubsume(hellene, tallie)\nResuspend(hellene, tallie)\nforall x (Subsume(x, hellene) -> Diverted(x))\nforall x (Goofy(x) -> Resuspend(x, tallie))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, tallie) and Lendable(tallie) -> Resuspend(x, hellene))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, hellene) and Inactivate(x, tallie) -> Subsume(x, hellene))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, tallie) -> Inactivate(x, hellene))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) and Resuspend(x, hellene) -> Resuspend(hellene, tallie))\n\nInactivate(hellene, hellene)\n\nInactivate(hellene, tallie) and forall x (Inactivate(x, tallie) -> Inactivate(x, hellene)) -> therefore Inactivate(hellene, hellene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The bridgette peep the selle. The bridgette is miry. The bridgette is worrisome. The bridgette is nervous. The bridgette squeegee the selle. The bridgette violate the selle. The selle peep the bridgette. The selle is flocculent. The selle squeegee the bridgette. The selle violate the bridgette. If someone squeegee the selle then they are nervous. If someone is miry then they visit the bridgette. If someone peep the bridgette and the bridgette is flocculent then they visit the selle. If someone peep the selle and they chase the bridgette then they see the selle. If someone peep the bridgette then they chase the selle. If someone is worrisome and they visit the selle then the selle violate the bridgette. The selle does not chase the selle.", "logic": "\nPeep(bridgette, selle)\nMiry(bridgette)\nWorrisome(bridgette)\nNervous(bridgette)\nSqueegee(bridgette, selle)\nViolate(bridgette, selle)\nPeep(selle, bridgette)\nFlocculent(selle)\nSqueegee(selle, bridgette)\nViolate(selle, bridgette)\nforall x (Squeegee(x, selle) -> Nervous(x))\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Violate(x, bridgette))\nforall x (Peep(x, bridgette) and Flocculent(bridgette) -> Violate(x, selle))\nforall x (Peep(x, selle) and Peep(x, bridgette) -> Squeegee(x, selle))\nforall x (Peep(x, bridgette) -> Peep(x, selle))\nforall x (Worrisome(x) and Violate(x, selle) -> Violate(selle, bridgette))\n\nnot Peep(selle, selle)\n\nPeep(selle, bridgette) and forall x (Peep(x, bridgette) -> Peep(x, selle)) -> therefore Peep(selle, selle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The verna pulverize the annalena. The verna is perversive. The verna is batwing. The verna is permeant. The verna wattle the annalena. The verna publicise the annalena. The annalena pulverize the verna. The annalena is truant. The annalena wattle the verna. The annalena publicise the verna. If someone wattle the annalena then they are permeant. If someone is perversive then they visit the verna. If someone pulverize the verna and the verna is truant then they visit the annalena. If someone pulverize the annalena and they chase the verna then they see the annalena. If someone pulverize the verna then they chase the annalena. If someone is batwing and they visit the annalena then the annalena publicise the verna. The annalena wattle the annalena.", "logic": "\nPulverize(verna, annalena)\nPerversive(verna)\nBatwing(verna)\nPermeant(verna)\nWattle(verna, annalena)\nPublicise(verna, annalena)\nPulverize(annalena, verna)\nTruant(annalena)\nWattle(annalena, verna)\nPublicise(annalena, verna)\nforall x (Wattle(x, annalena) -> Permeant(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Publicise(x, verna))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, verna) and Truant(verna) -> Publicise(x, annalena))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, annalena) and Pulverize(x, verna) -> Wattle(x, annalena))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, verna) -> Pulverize(x, annalena))\nforall x (Batwing(x) and Publicise(x, annalena) -> Publicise(annalena, verna))\n\nWattle(annalena, annalena)\n\nPulverize(annalena, verna) and forall x (Pulverize(x, verna) -> Pulverize(x, annalena)) -> therefore Pulverize(annalena, annalena) Pulverize(annalena, annalena) and Pulverize(annalena, verna) and forall x (Pulverize(x, annalena) and Pulverize(x, verna) -> Wattle(x, annalena)) -> therefore Wattle(annalena, annalena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The wood decease the clo. The wood is unjointed. The wood is geodesical. The wood is andante. The wood rhapsodise the clo. The wood voice the clo. The clo decease the wood. The clo is hunched. The clo rhapsodise the wood. The clo voice the wood. If someone rhapsodise the clo then they are andante. If someone is unjointed then they visit the wood. If someone decease the wood and the wood is hunched then they visit the clo. If someone decease the clo and they chase the wood then they see the clo. If someone decease the wood then they chase the clo. If someone is geodesical and they visit the clo then the clo voice the wood. The clo does not see the clo.", "logic": "\nDecease(wood, clo)\nUnjointed(wood)\nGeodesical(wood)\nAndante(wood)\nRhapsodise(wood, clo)\nVoice(wood, clo)\nDecease(clo, wood)\nHunched(clo)\nRhapsodise(clo, wood)\nVoice(clo, wood)\nforall x (Rhapsodise(x, clo) -> Andante(x))\nforall x (Unjointed(x) -> Voice(x, wood))\nforall x (Decease(x, wood) and Hunched(wood) -> Voice(x, clo))\nforall x (Decease(x, clo) and Decease(x, wood) -> Rhapsodise(x, clo))\nforall x (Decease(x, wood) -> Decease(x, clo))\nforall x (Geodesical(x) and Voice(x, clo) -> Voice(clo, wood))\n\nnot Rhapsodise(clo, clo)\n\nDecease(clo, wood) and forall x (Decease(x, wood) -> Decease(x, clo)) -> therefore Decease(clo, clo) Decease(clo, clo) and Decease(clo, wood) and forall x (Decease(x, clo) and Decease(x, wood) -> Rhapsodise(x, clo)) -> therefore Rhapsodise(clo, clo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The jonah bombard the joly. The jonah is dubious. The jonah is homocercal. The jonah is limbic. The jonah acetylise the joly. The jonah refit the joly. The joly bombard the jonah. The joly is orbiculate. The joly acetylise the jonah. The joly refit the jonah. If someone acetylise the joly then they are limbic. If someone is dubious then they visit the jonah. If someone bombard the jonah and the jonah is orbiculate then they visit the joly. If someone bombard the joly and they chase the jonah then they see the joly. If someone bombard the jonah then they chase the joly. If someone is homocercal and they visit the joly then the joly refit the jonah. The joly is limbic.", "logic": "\nBombard(jonah, joly)\nDubious(jonah)\nHomocercal(jonah)\nLimbic(jonah)\nAcetylise(jonah, joly)\nRefit(jonah, joly)\nBombard(joly, jonah)\nOrbiculate(joly)\nAcetylise(joly, jonah)\nRefit(joly, jonah)\nforall x (Acetylise(x, joly) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Dubious(x) -> Refit(x, jonah))\nforall x (Bombard(x, jonah) and Orbiculate(jonah) -> Refit(x, joly))\nforall x (Bombard(x, joly) and Bombard(x, jonah) -> Acetylise(x, joly))\nforall x (Bombard(x, jonah) -> Bombard(x, joly))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) and Refit(x, joly) -> Refit(joly, jonah))\n\nLimbic(joly)\n\nBombard(joly, jonah) and forall x (Bombard(x, jonah) -> Bombard(x, joly)) -> therefore Bombard(joly, joly) Bombard(joly, joly) and Bombard(joly, jonah) and forall x (Bombard(x, joly) and Bombard(x, jonah) -> Acetylise(x, joly)) -> therefore Acetylise(joly, joly) Acetylise(joly, joly) and forall x (Acetylise(x, joly) -> Limbic(x)) -> therefore Limbic(joly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The artie baptize the simmonds. The artie is resinlike. The artie is chewy. The artie is salverform. The artie disinherit the simmonds. The artie heed the simmonds. The simmonds baptize the artie. The simmonds is thrifty. The simmonds disinherit the artie. The simmonds heed the artie. If someone disinherit the simmonds then they are salverform. If someone is resinlike then they visit the artie. If someone baptize the artie and the artie is thrifty then they visit the simmonds. If someone baptize the simmonds and they chase the artie then they see the simmonds. If someone baptize the artie then they chase the simmonds. If someone is chewy and they visit the simmonds then the simmonds heed the artie. The simmonds is not salverform.", "logic": "\nBaptize(artie, simmonds)\nResinlike(artie)\nChewy(artie)\nSalverform(artie)\nDisinherit(artie, simmonds)\nHeed(artie, simmonds)\nBaptize(simmonds, artie)\nThrifty(simmonds)\nDisinherit(simmonds, artie)\nHeed(simmonds, artie)\nforall x (Disinherit(x, simmonds) -> Salverform(x))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) -> Heed(x, artie))\nforall x (Baptize(x, artie) and Thrifty(artie) -> Heed(x, simmonds))\nforall x (Baptize(x, simmonds) and Baptize(x, artie) -> Disinherit(x, simmonds))\nforall x (Baptize(x, artie) -> Baptize(x, simmonds))\nforall x (Chewy(x) and Heed(x, simmonds) -> Heed(simmonds, artie))\n\nnot Salverform(simmonds)\n\nBaptize(simmonds, artie) and forall x (Baptize(x, artie) -> Baptize(x, simmonds)) -> therefore Baptize(simmonds, simmonds) Baptize(simmonds, simmonds) and Baptize(simmonds, artie) and forall x (Baptize(x, simmonds) and Baptize(x, artie) -> Disinherit(x, simmonds)) -> therefore Disinherit(simmonds, simmonds) Disinherit(simmonds, simmonds) and forall x (Disinherit(x, simmonds) -> Salverform(x)) -> therefore Salverform(simmonds)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The melodee overuse the haydon. The melodee is oblong. The melodee is pyogenic. The melodee is robotlike. The melodee enlarge the haydon. The melodee body the haydon. The haydon overuse the melodee. The haydon is processed. The haydon enlarge the melodee. The haydon body the melodee. If someone enlarge the haydon then they are robotlike. If someone is oblong then they visit the melodee. If someone overuse the melodee and the melodee is processed then they visit the haydon. If someone overuse the haydon and they chase the melodee then they see the haydon. If someone overuse the melodee then they chase the haydon. If someone is pyogenic and they visit the haydon then the haydon body the melodee. The haydon does not visit the haydon.", "logic": "\nOveruse(melodee, haydon)\nOblong(melodee)\nPyogenic(melodee)\nRobotlike(melodee)\nEnlarge(melodee, haydon)\nBody(melodee, haydon)\nOveruse(haydon, melodee)\nProcessed(haydon)\nEnlarge(haydon, melodee)\nBody(haydon, melodee)\nforall x (Enlarge(x, haydon) -> Robotlike(x))\nforall x (Oblong(x) -> Body(x, melodee))\nforall x (Overuse(x, melodee) and Processed(melodee) -> Body(x, haydon))\nforall x (Overuse(x, haydon) and Overuse(x, melodee) -> Enlarge(x, haydon))\nforall x (Overuse(x, melodee) -> Overuse(x, haydon))\nforall x (Pyogenic(x) and Body(x, haydon) -> Body(haydon, melodee))\n\nnot Body(haydon, haydon)\n\nforall x (Overuse(x, melodee) and Processed(melodee) -> Body(x, haydon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The garv espouse the zena. The garv is eellike. The garv is carnation. The garv is boring. The garv twitter the zena. The garv venture the zena. The zena espouse the garv. The zena is mesodermal. The zena twitter the garv. The zena venture the garv. If someone twitter the zena then they are boring. If someone is eellike then they visit the garv. If someone espouse the garv and the garv is mesodermal then they visit the zena. If someone espouse the zena and they chase the garv then they see the zena. If someone espouse the garv then they chase the zena. If someone is carnation and they visit the zena then the zena venture the garv. The zena is carnation.", "logic": "\nEspouse(garv, zena)\nEellike(garv)\nCarnation(garv)\nBoring(garv)\nTwitter(garv, zena)\nVenture(garv, zena)\nEspouse(zena, garv)\nMesodermal(zena)\nTwitter(zena, garv)\nVenture(zena, garv)\nforall x (Twitter(x, zena) -> Boring(x))\nforall x (Eellike(x) -> Venture(x, garv))\nforall x (Espouse(x, garv) and Mesodermal(garv) -> Venture(x, zena))\nforall x (Espouse(x, zena) and Espouse(x, garv) -> Twitter(x, zena))\nforall x (Espouse(x, garv) -> Espouse(x, zena))\nforall x (Carnation(x) and Venture(x, zena) -> Venture(zena, garv))\n\nCarnation(zena)\n\nCarnation(zena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The rolph streamline the cindie. The rolph is undrawn. The rolph is lowbrowed. The rolph is asquint. The rolph blow the cindie. The rolph abate the cindie. The cindie streamline the rolph. The cindie is lifelike. The cindie blow the rolph. The cindie abate the rolph. If someone blow the cindie then they are asquint. If someone is undrawn then they visit the rolph. If someone streamline the rolph and the rolph is lifelike then they visit the cindie. If someone streamline the cindie and they chase the rolph then they see the cindie. If someone streamline the rolph then they chase the cindie. If someone is lowbrowed and they visit the cindie then the cindie abate the rolph. The cindie is not undrawn.", "logic": "\nStreamline(rolph, cindie)\nUndrawn(rolph)\nLowbrowed(rolph)\nAsquint(rolph)\nBlow(rolph, cindie)\nAbate(rolph, cindie)\nStreamline(cindie, rolph)\nLifelike(cindie)\nBlow(cindie, rolph)\nAbate(cindie, rolph)\nforall x (Blow(x, cindie) -> Asquint(x))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) -> Abate(x, rolph))\nforall x (Streamline(x, rolph) and Lifelike(rolph) -> Abate(x, cindie))\nforall x (Streamline(x, cindie) and Streamline(x, rolph) -> Blow(x, cindie))\nforall x (Streamline(x, rolph) -> Streamline(x, cindie))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) and Abate(x, cindie) -> Abate(cindie, rolph))\n\nnot Undrawn(cindie)\n\nnot Undrawn(cindie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The redmond propound the shandie. The redmond is paying. The redmond is anisogamic. The redmond is hollow. The redmond intermarry the shandie. The redmond boob the shandie. The shandie propound the redmond. The shandie is unbranded. The shandie intermarry the redmond. The shandie boob the redmond. If someone intermarry the shandie then they are hollow. If someone is paying then they visit the redmond. If someone propound the redmond and the redmond is unbranded then they visit the shandie. If someone propound the shandie and they chase the redmond then they see the shandie. If someone propound the redmond then they chase the shandie. If someone is anisogamic and they visit the shandie then the shandie boob the redmond. The redmond intermarry the redmond.", "logic": "\nPropound(redmond, shandie)\nPaying(redmond)\nAnisogamic(redmond)\nHollow(redmond)\nIntermarry(redmond, shandie)\nBoob(redmond, shandie)\nPropound(shandie, redmond)\nUnbranded(shandie)\nIntermarry(shandie, redmond)\nBoob(shandie, redmond)\nforall x (Intermarry(x, shandie) -> Hollow(x))\nforall x (Paying(x) -> Boob(x, redmond))\nforall x (Propound(x, redmond) and Unbranded(redmond) -> Boob(x, shandie))\nforall x (Propound(x, shandie) and Propound(x, redmond) -> Intermarry(x, shandie))\nforall x (Propound(x, redmond) -> Propound(x, shandie))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Boob(x, shandie) -> Boob(shandie, redmond))\n\nIntermarry(redmond, redmond)\n\nIntermarry(redmond, redmond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The tristan fret the marietta. The tristan is hominal. The tristan is digital. The tristan is rhetorical. The tristan mothproof the marietta. The tristan actualize the marietta. The marietta fret the tristan. The marietta is empyrean. The marietta mothproof the tristan. The marietta actualize the tristan. If someone mothproof the marietta then they are rhetorical. If someone is hominal then they visit the tristan. If someone fret the tristan and the tristan is empyrean then they visit the marietta. If someone fret the marietta and they chase the tristan then they see the marietta. If someone fret the tristan then they chase the marietta. If someone is digital and they visit the marietta then the marietta actualize the tristan. The tristan is not green.", "logic": "\nFret(tristan, marietta)\nHominal(tristan)\nDigital(tristan)\nRhetorical(tristan)\nMothproof(tristan, marietta)\nActualize(tristan, marietta)\nFret(marietta, tristan)\nEmpyrean(marietta)\nMothproof(marietta, tristan)\nActualize(marietta, tristan)\nforall x (Mothproof(x, marietta) -> Rhetorical(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) -> Actualize(x, tristan))\nforall x (Fret(x, tristan) and Empyrean(tristan) -> Actualize(x, marietta))\nforall x (Fret(x, marietta) and Fret(x, tristan) -> Mothproof(x, marietta))\nforall x (Fret(x, tristan) -> Fret(x, marietta))\nforall x (Digital(x) and Actualize(x, marietta) -> Actualize(marietta, tristan))\n\nnot Green(tristan)\n\nnot Green(tristan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The bell curdle the dennie. The bell is anadromous. The bell is graphical. The bell is enigmatic. The bell reduce the dennie. The bell cogitate the dennie. The dennie curdle the bell. The dennie is encircled. The dennie reduce the bell. The dennie cogitate the bell. If someone reduce the dennie then they are enigmatic. If someone is anadromous then they visit the bell. If someone curdle the bell and the bell is encircled then they visit the dennie. If someone curdle the dennie and they chase the bell then they see the dennie. If someone curdle the bell then they chase the dennie. If someone is graphical and they visit the dennie then the dennie cogitate the bell. The bell is encircled.", "logic": "\nCurdle(bell, dennie)\nAnadromous(bell)\nGraphical(bell)\nEnigmatic(bell)\nReduce(bell, dennie)\nCogitate(bell, dennie)\nCurdle(dennie, bell)\nEncircled(dennie)\nReduce(dennie, bell)\nCogitate(dennie, bell)\nforall x (Reduce(x, dennie) -> Enigmatic(x))\nforall x (Anadromous(x) -> Cogitate(x, bell))\nforall x (Curdle(x, bell) and Encircled(bell) -> Cogitate(x, dennie))\nforall x (Curdle(x, dennie) and Curdle(x, bell) -> Reduce(x, dennie))\nforall x (Curdle(x, bell) -> Curdle(x, dennie))\nforall x (Graphical(x) and Cogitate(x, dennie) -> Cogitate(dennie, bell))\n\nEncircled(bell)\n\nEncircled(bell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The torrey premiss the oralia. The torrey is admittible. The torrey is star. The torrey is futurist. The torrey summerize the oralia. The torrey vivify the oralia. The oralia premiss the torrey. The oralia is bulbous. The oralia summerize the torrey. The oralia vivify the torrey. If someone summerize the oralia then they are futurist. If someone is admittible then they visit the torrey. If someone premiss the torrey and the torrey is bulbous then they visit the oralia. If someone premiss the oralia and they chase the torrey then they see the oralia. If someone premiss the torrey then they chase the oralia. If someone is star and they visit the oralia then the oralia vivify the torrey. The torrey does not chase the torrey.", "logic": "\nPremiss(torrey, oralia)\nAdmittible(torrey)\nStar(torrey)\nFuturist(torrey)\nSummerize(torrey, oralia)\nVivify(torrey, oralia)\nPremiss(oralia, torrey)\nBulbous(oralia)\nSummerize(oralia, torrey)\nVivify(oralia, torrey)\nforall x (Summerize(x, oralia) -> Futurist(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) -> Vivify(x, torrey))\nforall x (Premiss(x, torrey) and Bulbous(torrey) -> Vivify(x, oralia))\nforall x (Premiss(x, oralia) and Premiss(x, torrey) -> Summerize(x, oralia))\nforall x (Premiss(x, torrey) -> Premiss(x, oralia))\nforall x (Star(x) and Vivify(x, oralia) -> Vivify(oralia, torrey))\n\nnot Premiss(torrey, torrey)\n\nnot Premiss(torrey, torrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The jilleen annul the carlyle. The jilleen is haemal. The jilleen is squinty. The jilleen is rooted. The jilleen career the carlyle. The jilleen liquidize the carlyle. The carlyle annul the jilleen. The carlyle is airheaded. The carlyle career the jilleen. The carlyle liquidize the jilleen. If someone career the carlyle then they are rooted. If someone is haemal then they visit the jilleen. If someone annul the jilleen and the jilleen is airheaded then they visit the carlyle. If someone annul the carlyle and they chase the jilleen then they see the carlyle. If someone annul the jilleen then they chase the carlyle. If someone is squinty and they visit the carlyle then the carlyle liquidize the jilleen. The carlyle is green.", "logic": "\nAnnul(jilleen, carlyle)\nHaemal(jilleen)\nSquinty(jilleen)\nRooted(jilleen)\nCareer(jilleen, carlyle)\nLiquidize(jilleen, carlyle)\nAnnul(carlyle, jilleen)\nAirheaded(carlyle)\nCareer(carlyle, jilleen)\nLiquidize(carlyle, jilleen)\nforall x (Career(x, carlyle) -> Rooted(x))\nforall x (Haemal(x) -> Liquidize(x, jilleen))\nforall x (Annul(x, jilleen) and Airheaded(jilleen) -> Liquidize(x, carlyle))\nforall x (Annul(x, carlyle) and Annul(x, jilleen) -> Career(x, carlyle))\nforall x (Annul(x, jilleen) -> Annul(x, carlyle))\nforall x (Squinty(x) and Liquidize(x, carlyle) -> Liquidize(carlyle, jilleen))\n\nGreen(carlyle)\n\nGreen(carlyle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1033"} {"premises": "The darcey flame the vic. The vic mortise the darcey. If someone is unlobed then they do not need the vic. If someone is epistemic and entozoan then they eat the darcey. If someone flame the darcey then they need the darcey. If someone mortise the vic then they need the darcey. If the vic mortise the darcey then the darcey mortise the vic. If someone is unlobed and they do not eat the darcey then the darcey catalyze the vic. If someone catalyze the darcey then the darcey catalyze the vic. If someone is unlobed and they do not need the darcey then they eat the vic. The darcey flame the vic.", "logic": "\nFlame(darcey, vic)\nMortise(vic, darcey)\nforall x (Unlobed(x) -> not Catalyze(x, vic))\nforall x (Epistemic(x) and Entozoan(x) -> Flame(x, darcey))\nforall x (Flame(x, darcey) -> Catalyze(x, darcey))\nforall x (Mortise(x, vic) -> Catalyze(x, darcey))\nMortise(vic, darcey) -> Mortise(darcey, vic)\nforall x (Unlobed(x) and not Flame(x, darcey) -> Catalyze(darcey, vic))\nforall x (Catalyze(x, darcey) -> Catalyze(darcey, vic))\nforall x (Unlobed(x) and not Catalyze(x, darcey) -> Flame(x, vic))\n\nFlame(darcey, vic)\n\ntherefore Flame(darcey, vic)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The seline throng the ora. The ora embank the seline. If someone is sigmoid then they do not need the ora. If someone is dipylon and scentless then they eat the seline. If someone throng the seline then they need the seline. If someone embank the ora then they need the seline. If the ora embank the seline then the seline embank the ora. If someone is sigmoid and they do not eat the seline then the seline slough the ora. If someone slough the seline then the seline slough the ora. If someone is sigmoid and they do not need the seline then they eat the ora. The seline does not eat the ora.", "logic": "\nThrong(seline, ora)\nEmbank(ora, seline)\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) -> not Slough(x, ora))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and Scentless(x) -> Throng(x, seline))\nforall x (Throng(x, seline) -> Slough(x, seline))\nforall x (Embank(x, ora) -> Slough(x, seline))\nEmbank(ora, seline) -> Embank(seline, ora)\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) and not Throng(x, seline) -> Slough(seline, ora))\nforall x (Slough(x, seline) -> Slough(seline, ora))\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) and not Slough(x, seline) -> Throng(x, ora))\n\nnot Throng(seline, ora)\n\ntherefore Throng(seline, ora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The rebekah dismount the rachele. The rachele coordinate the rebekah. If someone is leaky then they do not need the rachele. If someone is fungoid and postpaid then they eat the rebekah. If someone dismount the rebekah then they need the rebekah. If someone coordinate the rachele then they need the rebekah. If the rachele coordinate the rebekah then the rebekah coordinate the rachele. If someone is leaky and they do not eat the rebekah then the rebekah critique the rachele. If someone critique the rebekah then the rebekah critique the rachele. If someone is leaky and they do not need the rebekah then they eat the rachele. The rebekah coordinate the rachele.", "logic": "\nDismount(rebekah, rachele)\nCoordinate(rachele, rebekah)\nforall x (Leaky(x) -> not Critique(x, rachele))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and Postpaid(x) -> Dismount(x, rebekah))\nforall x (Dismount(x, rebekah) -> Critique(x, rebekah))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, rachele) -> Critique(x, rebekah))\nCoordinate(rachele, rebekah) -> Coordinate(rebekah, rachele)\nforall x (Leaky(x) and not Dismount(x, rebekah) -> Critique(rebekah, rachele))\nforall x (Critique(x, rebekah) -> Critique(rebekah, rachele))\nforall x (Leaky(x) and not Critique(x, rebekah) -> Dismount(x, rachele))\n\nCoordinate(rebekah, rachele)\n\nCoordinate(rachele, rebekah) and Coordinate(rachele, rebekah) -> Coordinate(rebekah, rachele) -> therefore Coordinate(rebekah, rachele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The goldina conjugate the milicent. The milicent itemize the goldina. If someone is susurrous then they do not need the milicent. If someone is bust and epileptic then they eat the goldina. If someone conjugate the goldina then they need the goldina. If someone itemize the milicent then they need the goldina. If the milicent itemize the goldina then the goldina itemize the milicent. If someone is susurrous and they do not eat the goldina then the goldina scribble the milicent. If someone scribble the goldina then the goldina scribble the milicent. If someone is susurrous and they do not need the goldina then they eat the milicent. The goldina does not see the milicent.", "logic": "\nConjugate(goldina, milicent)\nItemize(milicent, goldina)\nforall x (Susurrous(x) -> not Scribble(x, milicent))\nforall x (Bust(x) and Epileptic(x) -> Conjugate(x, goldina))\nforall x (Conjugate(x, goldina) -> Scribble(x, goldina))\nforall x (Itemize(x, milicent) -> Scribble(x, goldina))\nItemize(milicent, goldina) -> Itemize(goldina, milicent)\nforall x (Susurrous(x) and not Conjugate(x, goldina) -> Scribble(goldina, milicent))\nforall x (Scribble(x, goldina) -> Scribble(goldina, milicent))\nforall x (Susurrous(x) and not Scribble(x, goldina) -> Conjugate(x, milicent))\n\nnot Itemize(goldina, milicent)\n\nItemize(milicent, goldina) and Itemize(milicent, goldina) -> Itemize(goldina, milicent) -> therefore Itemize(goldina, milicent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The thayne felt the darya. The darya shmoose the thayne. If someone is selfish then they do not need the darya. If someone is bareback and premature then they eat the thayne. If someone felt the thayne then they need the thayne. If someone shmoose the darya then they need the thayne. If the darya shmoose the thayne then the thayne shmoose the darya. If someone is selfish and they do not eat the thayne then the thayne enroll the darya. If someone enroll the thayne then the thayne enroll the darya. If someone is selfish and they do not need the thayne then they eat the darya. The thayne enroll the thayne.", "logic": "\nFelt(thayne, darya)\nShmoose(darya, thayne)\nforall x (Selfish(x) -> not Enroll(x, darya))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Premature(x) -> Felt(x, thayne))\nforall x (Felt(x, thayne) -> Enroll(x, thayne))\nforall x (Shmoose(x, darya) -> Enroll(x, thayne))\nShmoose(darya, thayne) -> Shmoose(thayne, darya)\nforall x (Selfish(x) and not Felt(x, thayne) -> Enroll(thayne, darya))\nforall x (Enroll(x, thayne) -> Enroll(thayne, darya))\nforall x (Selfish(x) and not Enroll(x, thayne) -> Felt(x, darya))\n\nEnroll(thayne, thayne)\n\nShmoose(darya, thayne) and Shmoose(darya, thayne) -> Shmoose(thayne, darya) -> therefore Shmoose(thayne, darya) Shmoose(thayne, darya) and forall x (Shmoose(x, darya) -> Enroll(x, thayne)) -> therefore Enroll(thayne, thayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The adah abut the ross. The ross cede the adah. If someone is burdenless then they do not need the ross. If someone is terse and columnlike then they eat the adah. If someone abut the adah then they need the adah. If someone cede the ross then they need the adah. If the ross cede the adah then the adah cede the ross. If someone is burdenless and they do not eat the adah then the adah score the ross. If someone score the adah then the adah score the ross. If someone is burdenless and they do not need the adah then they eat the ross. The adah does not need the adah.", "logic": "\nAbut(adah, ross)\nCede(ross, adah)\nforall x (Burdenless(x) -> not Score(x, ross))\nforall x (Terse(x) and Columnlike(x) -> Abut(x, adah))\nforall x (Abut(x, adah) -> Score(x, adah))\nforall x (Cede(x, ross) -> Score(x, adah))\nCede(ross, adah) -> Cede(adah, ross)\nforall x (Burdenless(x) and not Abut(x, adah) -> Score(adah, ross))\nforall x (Score(x, adah) -> Score(adah, ross))\nforall x (Burdenless(x) and not Score(x, adah) -> Abut(x, ross))\n\nnot Score(adah, adah)\n\nCede(ross, adah) and Cede(ross, adah) -> Cede(adah, ross) -> therefore Cede(adah, ross) Cede(adah, ross) and forall x (Cede(x, ross) -> Score(x, adah)) -> therefore Score(adah, adah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The laney smirch the rhona. The rhona grunt the laney. If someone is learned then they do not need the rhona. If someone is obtuse and admonitory then they eat the laney. If someone smirch the laney then they need the laney. If someone grunt the rhona then they need the laney. If the rhona grunt the laney then the laney grunt the rhona. If someone is learned and they do not eat the laney then the laney rankle the rhona. If someone rankle the laney then the laney rankle the rhona. If someone is learned and they do not need the laney then they eat the rhona. The laney rankle the rhona.", "logic": "\nSmirch(laney, rhona)\nGrunt(rhona, laney)\nforall x (Learned(x) -> not Rankle(x, rhona))\nforall x (Obtuse(x) and Admonitory(x) -> Smirch(x, laney))\nforall x (Smirch(x, laney) -> Rankle(x, laney))\nforall x (Grunt(x, rhona) -> Rankle(x, laney))\nGrunt(rhona, laney) -> Grunt(laney, rhona)\nforall x (Learned(x) and not Smirch(x, laney) -> Rankle(laney, rhona))\nforall x (Rankle(x, laney) -> Rankle(laney, rhona))\nforall x (Learned(x) and not Rankle(x, laney) -> Smirch(x, rhona))\n\nRankle(laney, rhona)\n\nGrunt(rhona, laney) and Grunt(rhona, laney) -> Grunt(laney, rhona) -> therefore Grunt(laney, rhona) Grunt(laney, rhona) and forall x (Grunt(x, rhona) -> Rankle(x, laney)) -> therefore Rankle(laney, laney) Rankle(laney, laney) and forall x (Rankle(x, laney) -> Rankle(laney, rhona)) -> therefore Rankle(laney, rhona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The claudine vend the celestina. The celestina travail the claudine. If someone is ventricous then they do not need the celestina. If someone is homely and ripened then they eat the claudine. If someone vend the claudine then they need the claudine. If someone travail the celestina then they need the claudine. If the celestina travail the claudine then the claudine travail the celestina. If someone is ventricous and they do not eat the claudine then the claudine raid the celestina. If someone raid the claudine then the claudine raid the celestina. If someone is ventricous and they do not need the claudine then they eat the celestina. The claudine does not need the celestina.", "logic": "\nVend(claudine, celestina)\nTravail(celestina, claudine)\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> not Raid(x, celestina))\nforall x (Homely(x) and Ripened(x) -> Vend(x, claudine))\nforall x (Vend(x, claudine) -> Raid(x, claudine))\nforall x (Travail(x, celestina) -> Raid(x, claudine))\nTravail(celestina, claudine) -> Travail(claudine, celestina)\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and not Vend(x, claudine) -> Raid(claudine, celestina))\nforall x (Raid(x, claudine) -> Raid(claudine, celestina))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and not Raid(x, claudine) -> Vend(x, celestina))\n\nnot Raid(claudine, celestina)\n\nTravail(celestina, claudine) and Travail(celestina, claudine) -> Travail(claudine, celestina) -> therefore Travail(claudine, celestina) Travail(claudine, celestina) and forall x (Travail(x, celestina) -> Raid(x, claudine)) -> therefore Raid(claudine, claudine) Raid(claudine, claudine) and forall x (Raid(x, claudine) -> Raid(claudine, celestina)) -> therefore Raid(claudine, celestina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The aina overreach the trixi. The trixi skyrocket the aina. If someone is katabolic then they do not need the trixi. If someone is fluent and baronial then they eat the aina. If someone overreach the aina then they need the aina. If someone skyrocket the trixi then they need the aina. If the trixi skyrocket the aina then the aina skyrocket the trixi. If someone is katabolic and they do not eat the aina then the aina liven the trixi. If someone liven the aina then the aina liven the trixi. If someone is katabolic and they do not need the aina then they eat the trixi. The trixi does not eat the trixi.", "logic": "\nOverreach(aina, trixi)\nSkyrocket(trixi, aina)\nforall x (Katabolic(x) -> not Liven(x, trixi))\nforall x (Fluent(x) and Baronial(x) -> Overreach(x, aina))\nforall x (Overreach(x, aina) -> Liven(x, aina))\nforall x (Skyrocket(x, trixi) -> Liven(x, aina))\nSkyrocket(trixi, aina) -> Skyrocket(aina, trixi)\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and not Overreach(x, aina) -> Liven(aina, trixi))\nforall x (Liven(x, aina) -> Liven(aina, trixi))\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and not Liven(x, aina) -> Overreach(x, trixi))\n\nnot Overreach(trixi, trixi)\n\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and not Liven(x, aina) -> Overreach(x, trixi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The camile browbeat the quintin. The quintin evanesce the camile. If someone is biserrate then they do not need the quintin. If someone is anecdotic and cheery then they eat the camile. If someone browbeat the camile then they need the camile. If someone evanesce the quintin then they need the camile. If the quintin evanesce the camile then the camile evanesce the quintin. If someone is biserrate and they do not eat the camile then the camile lengthen the quintin. If someone lengthen the camile then the camile lengthen the quintin. If someone is biserrate and they do not need the camile then they eat the quintin. The camile browbeat the camile.", "logic": "\nBrowbeat(camile, quintin)\nEvanesce(quintin, camile)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> not Lengthen(x, quintin))\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) and Cheery(x) -> Browbeat(x, camile))\nforall x (Browbeat(x, camile) -> Lengthen(x, camile))\nforall x (Evanesce(x, quintin) -> Lengthen(x, camile))\nEvanesce(quintin, camile) -> Evanesce(camile, quintin)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) and not Browbeat(x, camile) -> Lengthen(camile, quintin))\nforall x (Lengthen(x, camile) -> Lengthen(camile, quintin))\nforall x (Biserrate(x) and not Lengthen(x, camile) -> Browbeat(x, quintin))\n\nBrowbeat(camile, camile)\n\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) and Cheery(x) -> Browbeat(x, camile)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The junette sprain the angelina. The angelina casket the junette. If someone is abstracted then they do not need the angelina. If someone is winged and spoilable then they eat the junette. If someone sprain the junette then they need the junette. If someone casket the angelina then they need the junette. If the angelina casket the junette then the junette casket the angelina. If someone is abstracted and they do not eat the junette then the junette exsert the angelina. If someone exsert the junette then the junette exsert the angelina. If someone is abstracted and they do not need the junette then they eat the angelina. The angelina does not eat the junette.", "logic": "\nSprain(junette, angelina)\nCasket(angelina, junette)\nforall x (Abstracted(x) -> not Exsert(x, angelina))\nforall x (Winged(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Sprain(x, junette))\nforall x (Sprain(x, junette) -> Exsert(x, junette))\nforall x (Casket(x, angelina) -> Exsert(x, junette))\nCasket(angelina, junette) -> Casket(junette, angelina)\nforall x (Abstracted(x) and not Sprain(x, junette) -> Exsert(junette, angelina))\nforall x (Exsert(x, junette) -> Exsert(junette, angelina))\nforall x (Abstracted(x) and not Exsert(x, junette) -> Sprain(x, angelina))\n\nnot Sprain(angelina, junette)\n\nforall x (Winged(x) and Spoilable(x) -> Sprain(x, junette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The angelico corn the bonita. The bonita outdraw the angelico. If someone is cupular then they do not need the bonita. If someone is relaxed and unportable then they eat the angelico. If someone corn the angelico then they need the angelico. If someone outdraw the bonita then they need the angelico. If the bonita outdraw the angelico then the angelico outdraw the bonita. If someone is cupular and they do not eat the angelico then the angelico nosh the bonita. If someone nosh the angelico then the angelico nosh the bonita. If someone is cupular and they do not need the angelico then they eat the bonita. The bonita nosh the angelico.", "logic": "\nCorn(angelico, bonita)\nOutdraw(bonita, angelico)\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> not Nosh(x, bonita))\nforall x (Relaxed(x) and Unportable(x) -> Corn(x, angelico))\nforall x (Corn(x, angelico) -> Nosh(x, angelico))\nforall x (Outdraw(x, bonita) -> Nosh(x, angelico))\nOutdraw(bonita, angelico) -> Outdraw(angelico, bonita)\nforall x (Cupular(x) and not Corn(x, angelico) -> Nosh(angelico, bonita))\nforall x (Nosh(x, angelico) -> Nosh(angelico, bonita))\nforall x (Cupular(x) and not Nosh(x, angelico) -> Corn(x, bonita))\n\nNosh(bonita, angelico)\n\nforall x (Corn(x, angelico) -> Nosh(x, angelico)) <- forall x (Relaxed(x) and Unportable(x) -> Corn(x, angelico)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The raine lull the flin. The flin enjoy the raine. If someone is vacuous then they do not need the flin. If someone is mutualist and magnetised then they eat the raine. If someone lull the raine then they need the raine. If someone enjoy the flin then they need the raine. If the flin enjoy the raine then the raine enjoy the flin. If someone is vacuous and they do not eat the raine then the raine grimace the flin. If someone grimace the raine then the raine grimace the flin. If someone is vacuous and they do not need the raine then they eat the flin. The flin is not magnetised.", "logic": "\nLull(raine, flin)\nEnjoy(flin, raine)\nforall x (Vacuous(x) -> not Grimace(x, flin))\nforall x (Mutualist(x) and Magnetised(x) -> Lull(x, raine))\nforall x (Lull(x, raine) -> Grimace(x, raine))\nforall x (Enjoy(x, flin) -> Grimace(x, raine))\nEnjoy(flin, raine) -> Enjoy(raine, flin)\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and not Lull(x, raine) -> Grimace(raine, flin))\nforall x (Grimace(x, raine) -> Grimace(raine, flin))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and not Grimace(x, raine) -> Lull(x, flin))\n\nnot Magnetised(flin)\n\nnot Magnetised(flin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The laverna bulge the rich. The rich humour the laverna. If someone is provisory then they do not need the rich. If someone is swishy and affecting then they eat the laverna. If someone bulge the laverna then they need the laverna. If someone humour the rich then they need the laverna. If the rich humour the laverna then the laverna humour the rich. If someone is provisory and they do not eat the laverna then the laverna swoon the rich. If someone swoon the laverna then the laverna swoon the rich. If someone is provisory and they do not need the laverna then they eat the rich. The rich is provisory.", "logic": "\nBulge(laverna, rich)\nHumour(rich, laverna)\nforall x (Provisory(x) -> not Swoon(x, rich))\nforall x (Swishy(x) and Affecting(x) -> Bulge(x, laverna))\nforall x (Bulge(x, laverna) -> Swoon(x, laverna))\nforall x (Humour(x, rich) -> Swoon(x, laverna))\nHumour(rich, laverna) -> Humour(laverna, rich)\nforall x (Provisory(x) and not Bulge(x, laverna) -> Swoon(laverna, rich))\nforall x (Swoon(x, laverna) -> Swoon(laverna, rich))\nforall x (Provisory(x) and not Swoon(x, laverna) -> Bulge(x, rich))\n\nProvisory(rich)\n\nProvisory(rich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The coretta bewitch the alberta. The alberta pose the coretta. If someone is alate then they do not need the alberta. If someone is tied and strained then they eat the coretta. If someone bewitch the coretta then they need the coretta. If someone pose the alberta then they need the coretta. If the alberta pose the coretta then the coretta pose the alberta. If someone is alate and they do not eat the coretta then the coretta react the alberta. If someone react the coretta then the coretta react the alberta. If someone is alate and they do not need the coretta then they eat the alberta. The coretta does not see the coretta.", "logic": "\nBewitch(coretta, alberta)\nPose(alberta, coretta)\nforall x (Alate(x) -> not React(x, alberta))\nforall x (Tied(x) and Strained(x) -> Bewitch(x, coretta))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, coretta) -> React(x, coretta))\nforall x (Pose(x, alberta) -> React(x, coretta))\nPose(alberta, coretta) -> Pose(coretta, alberta)\nforall x (Alate(x) and not Bewitch(x, coretta) -> React(coretta, alberta))\nforall x (React(x, coretta) -> React(coretta, alberta))\nforall x (Alate(x) and not React(x, coretta) -> Bewitch(x, alberta))\n\nnot Pose(coretta, coretta)\n\nnot Pose(coretta, coretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "The inglebert entwine the jennie. The jennie slog the inglebert. If someone is slighting then they do not need the jennie. If someone is beneficed and tormented then they eat the inglebert. If someone entwine the inglebert then they need the inglebert. If someone slog the jennie then they need the inglebert. If the jennie slog the inglebert then the inglebert slog the jennie. If someone is slighting and they do not eat the inglebert then the inglebert optimise the jennie. If someone optimise the inglebert then the inglebert optimise the jennie. If someone is slighting and they do not need the inglebert then they eat the jennie. The jennie slog the jennie.", "logic": "\nEntwine(inglebert, jennie)\nSlog(jennie, inglebert)\nforall x (Slighting(x) -> not Optimise(x, jennie))\nforall x (Beneficed(x) and Tormented(x) -> Entwine(x, inglebert))\nforall x (Entwine(x, inglebert) -> Optimise(x, inglebert))\nforall x (Slog(x, jennie) -> Optimise(x, inglebert))\nSlog(jennie, inglebert) -> Slog(inglebert, jennie)\nforall x (Slighting(x) and not Entwine(x, inglebert) -> Optimise(inglebert, jennie))\nforall x (Optimise(x, inglebert) -> Optimise(inglebert, jennie))\nforall x (Slighting(x) and not Optimise(x, inglebert) -> Entwine(x, jennie))\n\nSlog(jennie, jennie)\n\nSlog(jennie, jennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1115"} {"premises": "Alain is wearying. Eugene is gritty. Jonell is historied. Jonell is cloistered. Marsiella is untitled. Marsiella is adjuratory. Marsiella is gritty. If Jonell is gritty then Jonell is wearying. If Alain is cloistered then Alain is wearying. If someone is mendelian then they are cloistered. Marsiella is adjuratory.", "logic": "\nWearying(alain)\nGritty(eugene)\nHistoried(jonell)\nCloistered(jonell)\nUntitled(marsiella)\nAdjuratory(marsiella)\nGritty(marsiella)\nGritty(jonell) -> Wearying(jonell)\nCloistered(alain) -> Wearying(alain)\nforall x (Mendelian(x) -> Cloistered(x))\n\nAdjuratory(marsiella)\n\ntherefore Adjuratory(marsiella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3142"} {"premises": "Tamarah is afferent. Andres is demented. Mirelle is tubed. Mirelle is unsexy. Margalo is crural. Margalo is shut. Margalo is demented. If Mirelle is demented then Mirelle is afferent. If Tamarah is unsexy then Tamarah is afferent. If someone is registered then they are unsexy. Tamarah is not afferent.", "logic": "\nAfferent(tamarah)\nDemented(andres)\nTubed(mirelle)\nUnsexy(mirelle)\nCrural(margalo)\nShut(margalo)\nDemented(margalo)\nDemented(mirelle) -> Afferent(mirelle)\nUnsexy(tamarah) -> Afferent(tamarah)\nforall x (Registered(x) -> Unsexy(x))\n\nnot Afferent(tamarah)\n\ntherefore Afferent(tamarah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3142"} {"premises": "Marne is toothless. Ramsay is ribald. Ashli is waiting. Ashli is dense. Bearnard is arbitrable. Bearnard is federate. Bearnard is ribald. If Ashli is ribald then Ashli is toothless. If Marne is dense then Marne is toothless. If someone is carbonated then they are dense. Ashli is not toothless.", "logic": "\nToothless(marne)\nRibald(ramsay)\nWaiting(ashli)\nDense(ashli)\nArbitrable(bearnard)\nFederate(bearnard)\nRibald(bearnard)\nRibald(ashli) -> Toothless(ashli)\nDense(marne) -> Toothless(marne)\nforall x (Carbonated(x) -> Dense(x))\n\nnot Toothless(ashli)\n\nRibald(ashli) -> Toothless(ashli) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3142"} {"premises": "Selby is crinkly. Poul is masculine. Thurstan is naval. Thurstan is misogynic. Jere is pulpy. Jere is scabrous. Jere is masculine. If Thurstan is masculine then Thurstan is crinkly. If Selby is misogynic then Selby is crinkly. If someone is homiletic then they are misogynic. Thurstan is homiletic.", "logic": "\nCrinkly(selby)\nMasculine(poul)\nNaval(thurstan)\nMisogynic(thurstan)\nPulpy(jere)\nScabrous(jere)\nMasculine(jere)\nMasculine(thurstan) -> Crinkly(thurstan)\nMisogynic(selby) -> Crinkly(selby)\nforall x (Homiletic(x) -> Misogynic(x))\n\nHomiletic(thurstan)\n\nHomiletic(thurstan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3142"} {"premises": "Grier is assorted. Grier is searching. Terra is healthier. Terra is searching. Terra is taciturn. Marv is taciturn. Gershom is desolate. If something is antitypic and searching then it is desolate. All assorted things are antitypic. If Grier is desolate then Grier is unsaddled. Terra is searching.", "logic": "\nAssorted(grier)\nSearching(grier)\nHealthier(terra)\nSearching(terra)\nTaciturn(terra)\nTaciturn(marv)\nDesolate(gershom)\nforall x (Antitypic(x) and Searching(x) -> Desolate(x))\nforall x (Assorted(x) -> Antitypic(x))\nDesolate(grier) -> Unsaddled(grier)\n\nSearching(terra)\n\ntherefore Searching(terra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Edgardo is inpouring. Edgardo is murmurous. Thatcher is addible. Thatcher is murmurous. Thatcher is toxicant. Vanny is toxicant. Ramsay is coriaceous. If something is overaged and murmurous then it is coriaceous. All inpouring things are overaged. If Edgardo is coriaceous then Edgardo is such. Thatcher is not murmurous.", "logic": "\nInpouring(edgardo)\nMurmurous(edgardo)\nAddible(thatcher)\nMurmurous(thatcher)\nToxicant(thatcher)\nToxicant(vanny)\nCoriaceous(ramsay)\nforall x (Overaged(x) and Murmurous(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) -> Overaged(x))\nCoriaceous(edgardo) -> Such(edgardo)\n\nnot Murmurous(thatcher)\n\ntherefore Murmurous(thatcher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Patricia is geothermal. Patricia is eminent. Cathy is abundant. Cathy is eminent. Cathy is unseamed. Tudor is unseamed. Tatum is xanthous. If something is nitid and eminent then it is xanthous. All geothermal things are nitid. If Patricia is xanthous then Patricia is copulatory. Patricia is nitid.", "logic": "\nGeothermal(patricia)\nEminent(patricia)\nAbundant(cathy)\nEminent(cathy)\nUnseamed(cathy)\nUnseamed(tudor)\nXanthous(tatum)\nforall x (Nitid(x) and Eminent(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Geothermal(x) -> Nitid(x))\nXanthous(patricia) -> Copulatory(patricia)\n\nNitid(patricia)\n\nGeothermal(patricia) and forall x (Geothermal(x) -> Nitid(x)) -> therefore Nitid(patricia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Alana is insanitary. Alana is iritic. Elisha is hushed. Elisha is iritic. Elisha is gushing. Towney is gushing. Jessey is applied. If something is diastolic and iritic then it is applied. All insanitary things are diastolic. If Alana is applied then Alana is penurious. Alana is not diastolic.", "logic": "\nInsanitary(alana)\nIritic(alana)\nHushed(elisha)\nIritic(elisha)\nGushing(elisha)\nGushing(towney)\nApplied(jessey)\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Iritic(x) -> Applied(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nApplied(alana) -> Penurious(alana)\n\nnot Diastolic(alana)\n\nInsanitary(alana) and forall x (Insanitary(x) -> Diastolic(x)) -> therefore Diastolic(alana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Ender is saponified. Ender is undone. Issy is rearmost. Issy is undone. Issy is assistant. Harcourt is assistant. Jennings is bisexual. If something is excited and undone then it is bisexual. All saponified things are excited. If Ender is bisexual then Ender is tolerable. Ender is bisexual.", "logic": "\nSaponified(ender)\nUndone(ender)\nRearmost(issy)\nUndone(issy)\nAssistant(issy)\nAssistant(harcourt)\nBisexual(jennings)\nforall x (Excited(x) and Undone(x) -> Bisexual(x))\nforall x (Saponified(x) -> Excited(x))\nBisexual(ender) -> Tolerable(ender)\n\nBisexual(ender)\n\nSaponified(ender) and forall x (Saponified(x) -> Excited(x)) -> therefore Excited(ender) Excited(ender) and Undone(ender) and forall x (Excited(x) and Undone(x) -> Bisexual(x)) -> therefore Bisexual(ender)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Barnie is chthonic. Barnie is sepaline. Emilio is nonracial. Emilio is sepaline. Emilio is carnal. Harlie is carnal. Trescha is homoerotic. If something is modular and sepaline then it is homoerotic. All chthonic things are modular. If Barnie is homoerotic then Barnie is unchecked. Barnie is not homoerotic.", "logic": "\nChthonic(barnie)\nSepaline(barnie)\nNonracial(emilio)\nSepaline(emilio)\nCarnal(emilio)\nCarnal(harlie)\nHomoerotic(trescha)\nforall x (Modular(x) and Sepaline(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Chthonic(x) -> Modular(x))\nHomoerotic(barnie) -> Unchecked(barnie)\n\nnot Homoerotic(barnie)\n\nChthonic(barnie) and forall x (Chthonic(x) -> Modular(x)) -> therefore Modular(barnie) Modular(barnie) and Sepaline(barnie) and forall x (Modular(x) and Sepaline(x) -> Homoerotic(x)) -> therefore Homoerotic(barnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Hilde is armoured. Hilde is monochrome. Nichole is aliphatic. Nichole is monochrome. Nichole is aberdonian. Rori is aberdonian. Conny is divinatory. If something is beamish and monochrome then it is divinatory. All armoured things are beamish. If Hilde is divinatory then Hilde is sufferable. Hilde is sufferable.", "logic": "\nArmoured(hilde)\nMonochrome(hilde)\nAliphatic(nichole)\nMonochrome(nichole)\nAberdonian(nichole)\nAberdonian(rori)\nDivinatory(conny)\nforall x (Beamish(x) and Monochrome(x) -> Divinatory(x))\nforall x (Armoured(x) -> Beamish(x))\nDivinatory(hilde) -> Sufferable(hilde)\n\nSufferable(hilde)\n\nArmoured(hilde) and forall x (Armoured(x) -> Beamish(x)) -> therefore Beamish(hilde) Beamish(hilde) and Monochrome(hilde) and forall x (Beamish(x) and Monochrome(x) -> Divinatory(x)) -> therefore Divinatory(hilde) Divinatory(hilde) and Divinatory(hilde) -> Sufferable(hilde) -> therefore Sufferable(hilde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Dickey is arrant. Dickey is acerose. Rosemary is elegiac. Rosemary is acerose. Rosemary is leavened. Mikey is leavened. Deloria is bitchy. If something is cockney and acerose then it is bitchy. All arrant things are cockney. If Dickey is bitchy then Dickey is absolute. Dickey is not absolute.", "logic": "\nArrant(dickey)\nAcerose(dickey)\nElegiac(rosemary)\nAcerose(rosemary)\nLeavened(rosemary)\nLeavened(mikey)\nBitchy(deloria)\nforall x (Cockney(x) and Acerose(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Arrant(x) -> Cockney(x))\nBitchy(dickey) -> Absolute(dickey)\n\nnot Absolute(dickey)\n\nArrant(dickey) and forall x (Arrant(x) -> Cockney(x)) -> therefore Cockney(dickey) Cockney(dickey) and Acerose(dickey) and forall x (Cockney(x) and Acerose(x) -> Bitchy(x)) -> therefore Bitchy(dickey) Bitchy(dickey) and Bitchy(dickey) -> Absolute(dickey) -> therefore Absolute(dickey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Filipe is pointed. Filipe is damaged. Ibbie is derivable. Ibbie is damaged. Ibbie is epidemic. Kalman is epidemic. Brittany is satisfied. If something is barbed and damaged then it is satisfied. All pointed things are barbed. If Filipe is satisfied then Filipe is unproved. Ibbie is not barbed.", "logic": "\nPointed(filipe)\nDamaged(filipe)\nDerivable(ibbie)\nDamaged(ibbie)\nEpidemic(ibbie)\nEpidemic(kalman)\nSatisfied(brittany)\nforall x (Barbed(x) and Damaged(x) -> Satisfied(x))\nforall x (Pointed(x) -> Barbed(x))\nSatisfied(filipe) -> Unproved(filipe)\n\nnot Barbed(ibbie)\n\nforall x (Pointed(x) -> Barbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Maisie is forbidding. Maisie is stalemated. Vinod is murmurous. Vinod is stalemated. Vinod is screwball. Gizela is screwball. Kenn is like. If something is arid and stalemated then it is like. All forbidding things are arid. If Maisie is like then Maisie is cambial. Vinod is like.", "logic": "\nForbidding(maisie)\nStalemated(maisie)\nMurmurous(vinod)\nStalemated(vinod)\nScrewball(vinod)\nScrewball(gizela)\nLike(kenn)\nforall x (Arid(x) and Stalemated(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Arid(x))\nLike(maisie) -> Cambial(maisie)\n\nLike(vinod)\n\nforall x (Arid(x) and Stalemated(x) -> Like(x)) <- forall x (Forbidding(x) -> Arid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Nero is required. Nero is brambly. Karil is duteous. Karil is brambly. Karil is foldaway. Gay is foldaway. Dante is equable. If something is linear and brambly then it is equable. All required things are linear. If Nero is equable then Nero is malarial. Gay is not equable.", "logic": "\nRequired(nero)\nBrambly(nero)\nDuteous(karil)\nBrambly(karil)\nFoldaway(karil)\nFoldaway(gay)\nEquable(dante)\nforall x (Linear(x) and Brambly(x) -> Equable(x))\nforall x (Required(x) -> Linear(x))\nEquable(nero) -> Malarial(nero)\n\nnot Equable(gay)\n\nforall x (Linear(x) and Brambly(x) -> Equable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Maryl is nonnomadic. Maryl is ribbony. Dorelle is compounded. Dorelle is ribbony. Dorelle is siamese. Erinn is siamese. Farra is populous. If something is armored and ribbony then it is populous. All nonnomadic things are armored. If Maryl is populous then Maryl is unaffixed. Erinn is armored.", "logic": "\nNonnomadic(maryl)\nRibbony(maryl)\nCompounded(dorelle)\nRibbony(dorelle)\nSiamese(dorelle)\nSiamese(erinn)\nPopulous(farra)\nforall x (Armored(x) and Ribbony(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Armored(x))\nPopulous(maryl) -> Unaffixed(maryl)\n\nArmored(erinn)\n\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Armored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Lars is balding. Lars is ratified. Gaston is apocarpous. Gaston is ratified. Gaston is seeing. Garvy is seeing. Trudie is semitropic. If something is barefoot and ratified then it is semitropic. All balding things are barefoot. If Lars is semitropic then Lars is sadducean. Trudie is not ratified.", "logic": "\nBalding(lars)\nRatified(lars)\nApocarpous(gaston)\nRatified(gaston)\nSeeing(gaston)\nSeeing(garvy)\nSemitropic(trudie)\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Ratified(x) -> Semitropic(x))\nforall x (Balding(x) -> Barefoot(x))\nSemitropic(lars) -> Sadducean(lars)\n\nnot Ratified(trudie)\n\nnot Ratified(trudie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Art is cannular. Art is flawed. Ezekiel is puerperal. Ezekiel is flawed. Ezekiel is riotous. Sherilyn is riotous. Glori is gray. If something is faux and flawed then it is gray. All cannular things are faux. If Art is gray then Art is spotty. Ezekiel is spotty.", "logic": "\nCannular(art)\nFlawed(art)\nPuerperal(ezekiel)\nFlawed(ezekiel)\nRiotous(ezekiel)\nRiotous(sherilyn)\nGray(glori)\nforall x (Faux(x) and Flawed(x) -> Gray(x))\nforall x (Cannular(x) -> Faux(x))\nGray(art) -> Spotty(art)\n\nSpotty(ezekiel)\n\nSpotty(ezekiel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Marin is heraldic. Marin is shorthand. Tyler is unknowing. Tyler is shorthand. Tyler is tractile. Endora is tractile. Sigfrid is raising. If something is baltic and shorthand then it is raising. All heraldic things are baltic. If Marin is raising then Marin is undrained. Marin is not unknowing.", "logic": "\nHeraldic(marin)\nShorthand(marin)\nUnknowing(tyler)\nShorthand(tyler)\nTractile(tyler)\nTractile(endora)\nRaising(sigfrid)\nforall x (Baltic(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Heraldic(x) -> Baltic(x))\nRaising(marin) -> Undrained(marin)\n\nnot Unknowing(marin)\n\nnot Unknowing(marin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Cornie is mongolian. Cornie is unmediated. Zacherie is iranian. Zacherie is unmediated. Zacherie is stripped. Maritsa is stripped. Tuck is hydrated. If something is smaller and unmediated then it is hydrated. All mongolian things are smaller. If Cornie is hydrated then Cornie is armoured. Tuck is stripped.", "logic": "\nMongolian(cornie)\nUnmediated(cornie)\nIranian(zacherie)\nUnmediated(zacherie)\nStripped(zacherie)\nStripped(maritsa)\nHydrated(tuck)\nforall x (Smaller(x) and Unmediated(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Smaller(x))\nHydrated(cornie) -> Armoured(cornie)\n\nStripped(tuck)\n\nStripped(tuck) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1199"} {"premises": "Emmanuel is unstudied. Emmanuel is drunken. Lanita is hermetic. Lanita is thirteen. Lanita is drunken. Lanita is rectified. Lanita is vicarial. Krishna is hermetic. Krishna is retrousse. Anita is hermetic. Anita is thirteen. Anita is unstudied. Anita is drunken. Anita is rectified. Anita is retrousse. Anita is vicarial. If someone is drunken then they are retrousse. Blue people are thirteen. If someone is unstudied and thirteen then they are vicarial. Round, vicarial people are thirteen. All retrousse people are rectified. Smart, drunken people are thirteen. Anita is drunken.", "logic": "\nUnstudied(emmanuel)\nDrunken(emmanuel)\nHermetic(lanita)\nThirteen(lanita)\nDrunken(lanita)\nRectified(lanita)\nVicarial(lanita)\nHermetic(krishna)\nRetrousse(krishna)\nHermetic(anita)\nThirteen(anita)\nUnstudied(anita)\nDrunken(anita)\nRectified(anita)\nRetrousse(anita)\nVicarial(anita)\nforall x (Drunken(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Unstudied(x) and Thirteen(x) -> Vicarial(x))\nforall x (Drunken(x) and Vicarial(x) -> Thirteen(x))\nforall x (Retrousse(x) -> Rectified(x))\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Drunken(x) -> Thirteen(x))\n\nDrunken(anita)\n\ntherefore Drunken(anita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Kincaid is knifelike. Kincaid is alate. Brier is healed. Brier is dextrous. Brier is alate. Brier is maleficent. Brier is sinless. Marylinda is healed. Marylinda is biaural. Pru is healed. Pru is dextrous. Pru is knifelike. Pru is alate. Pru is maleficent. Pru is biaural. Pru is sinless. If someone is alate then they are biaural. Blue people are dextrous. If someone is knifelike and dextrous then they are sinless. Round, sinless people are dextrous. All biaural people are maleficent. Smart, alate people are dextrous. Marylinda is not biaural.", "logic": "\nKnifelike(kincaid)\nAlate(kincaid)\nHealed(brier)\nDextrous(brier)\nAlate(brier)\nMaleficent(brier)\nSinless(brier)\nHealed(marylinda)\nBiaural(marylinda)\nHealed(pru)\nDextrous(pru)\nKnifelike(pru)\nAlate(pru)\nMaleficent(pru)\nBiaural(pru)\nSinless(pru)\nforall x (Alate(x) -> Biaural(x))\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Knifelike(x) and Dextrous(x) -> Sinless(x))\nforall x (Alate(x) and Sinless(x) -> Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) -> Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Maleficent(x) and Alate(x) -> Dextrous(x))\n\nnot Biaural(marylinda)\n\ntherefore Biaural(marylinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Adriena is iterative. Adriena is salutary. Kettie is christlike. Kettie is chief. Kettie is salutary. Kettie is transverse. Kettie is violable. Emmeline is christlike. Emmeline is unshod. Harmonie is christlike. Harmonie is chief. Harmonie is iterative. Harmonie is salutary. Harmonie is transverse. Harmonie is unshod. Harmonie is violable. If someone is salutary then they are unshod. Blue people are chief. If someone is iterative and chief then they are violable. Round, violable people are chief. All unshod people are transverse. Smart, salutary people are chief. Emmeline is chief.", "logic": "\nIterative(adriena)\nSalutary(adriena)\nChristlike(kettie)\nChief(kettie)\nSalutary(kettie)\nTransverse(kettie)\nViolable(kettie)\nChristlike(emmeline)\nUnshod(emmeline)\nChristlike(harmonie)\nChief(harmonie)\nIterative(harmonie)\nSalutary(harmonie)\nTransverse(harmonie)\nUnshod(harmonie)\nViolable(harmonie)\nforall x (Salutary(x) -> Unshod(x))\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> Chief(x))\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Chief(x) -> Violable(x))\nforall x (Salutary(x) and Violable(x) -> Chief(x))\nforall x (Unshod(x) -> Transverse(x))\nforall x (Transverse(x) and Salutary(x) -> Chief(x))\n\nChief(emmeline)\n\nChristlike(emmeline) and forall x (Christlike(x) -> Chief(x)) -> therefore Chief(emmeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Alic is busty. Alic is trenchant. Ellissa is puckish. Ellissa is eastbound. Ellissa is trenchant. Ellissa is hedonistic. Ellissa is cubical. Betty is puckish. Betty is adjunctive. Kynthia is puckish. Kynthia is eastbound. Kynthia is busty. Kynthia is trenchant. Kynthia is hedonistic. Kynthia is adjunctive. Kynthia is cubical. If someone is trenchant then they are adjunctive. Blue people are eastbound. If someone is busty and eastbound then they are cubical. Round, cubical people are eastbound. All adjunctive people are hedonistic. Smart, trenchant people are eastbound. Betty is not eastbound.", "logic": "\nBusty(alic)\nTrenchant(alic)\nPuckish(ellissa)\nEastbound(ellissa)\nTrenchant(ellissa)\nHedonistic(ellissa)\nCubical(ellissa)\nPuckish(betty)\nAdjunctive(betty)\nPuckish(kynthia)\nEastbound(kynthia)\nBusty(kynthia)\nTrenchant(kynthia)\nHedonistic(kynthia)\nAdjunctive(kynthia)\nCubical(kynthia)\nforall x (Trenchant(x) -> Adjunctive(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Eastbound(x))\nforall x (Busty(x) and Eastbound(x) -> Cubical(x))\nforall x (Trenchant(x) and Cubical(x) -> Eastbound(x))\nforall x (Adjunctive(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\nforall x (Hedonistic(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Eastbound(x))\n\nnot Eastbound(betty)\n\nPuckish(betty) and forall x (Puckish(x) -> Eastbound(x)) -> therefore Eastbound(betty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Zora is baculiform. Zora is ironclad. Mirabelle is israeli. Mirabelle is deadening. Mirabelle is ironclad. Mirabelle is unusual. Mirabelle is sensitive. Simeon is israeli. Simeon is antecedent. Dyson is israeli. Dyson is deadening. Dyson is baculiform. Dyson is ironclad. Dyson is unusual. Dyson is antecedent. Dyson is sensitive. If someone is ironclad then they are antecedent. Blue people are deadening. If someone is baculiform and deadening then they are sensitive. Round, sensitive people are deadening. All antecedent people are unusual. Smart, ironclad people are deadening. Zora is unusual.", "logic": "\nBaculiform(zora)\nIronclad(zora)\nIsraeli(mirabelle)\nDeadening(mirabelle)\nIronclad(mirabelle)\nUnusual(mirabelle)\nSensitive(mirabelle)\nIsraeli(simeon)\nAntecedent(simeon)\nIsraeli(dyson)\nDeadening(dyson)\nBaculiform(dyson)\nIronclad(dyson)\nUnusual(dyson)\nAntecedent(dyson)\nSensitive(dyson)\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Antecedent(x))\nforall x (Israeli(x) -> Deadening(x))\nforall x (Baculiform(x) and Deadening(x) -> Sensitive(x))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) and Sensitive(x) -> Deadening(x))\nforall x (Antecedent(x) -> Unusual(x))\nforall x (Unusual(x) and Ironclad(x) -> Deadening(x))\n\nUnusual(zora)\n\nIronclad(zora) and forall x (Ironclad(x) -> Antecedent(x)) -> therefore Antecedent(zora) Antecedent(zora) and forall x (Antecedent(x) -> Unusual(x)) -> therefore Unusual(zora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Caryl is brimless. Caryl is scarce. Clarine is aloof. Clarine is unwonted. Clarine is scarce. Clarine is undulatory. Clarine is prodromal. Dinnie is aloof. Dinnie is liberal. Farah is aloof. Farah is unwonted. Farah is brimless. Farah is scarce. Farah is undulatory. Farah is liberal. Farah is prodromal. If someone is scarce then they are liberal. Blue people are unwonted. If someone is brimless and unwonted then they are prodromal. Round, prodromal people are unwonted. All liberal people are undulatory. Smart, scarce people are unwonted. Caryl is not undulatory.", "logic": "\nBrimless(caryl)\nScarce(caryl)\nAloof(clarine)\nUnwonted(clarine)\nScarce(clarine)\nUndulatory(clarine)\nProdromal(clarine)\nAloof(dinnie)\nLiberal(dinnie)\nAloof(farah)\nUnwonted(farah)\nBrimless(farah)\nScarce(farah)\nUndulatory(farah)\nLiberal(farah)\nProdromal(farah)\nforall x (Scarce(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Unwonted(x))\nforall x (Brimless(x) and Unwonted(x) -> Prodromal(x))\nforall x (Scarce(x) and Prodromal(x) -> Unwonted(x))\nforall x (Liberal(x) -> Undulatory(x))\nforall x (Undulatory(x) and Scarce(x) -> Unwonted(x))\n\nnot Undulatory(caryl)\n\nScarce(caryl) and forall x (Scarce(x) -> Liberal(x)) -> therefore Liberal(caryl) Liberal(caryl) and forall x (Liberal(x) -> Undulatory(x)) -> therefore Undulatory(caryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Devonna is ochre. Devonna is lasting. Carolan is only. Carolan is criterial. Carolan is lasting. Carolan is nonbearing. Carolan is temperate. Roze is only. Roze is stupefying. Sammie is only. Sammie is criterial. Sammie is ochre. Sammie is lasting. Sammie is nonbearing. Sammie is stupefying. Sammie is temperate. If someone is lasting then they are stupefying. Blue people are criterial. If someone is ochre and criterial then they are temperate. Round, temperate people are criterial. All stupefying people are nonbearing. Smart, lasting people are criterial. Devonna is criterial.", "logic": "\nOchre(devonna)\nLasting(devonna)\nOnly(carolan)\nCriterial(carolan)\nLasting(carolan)\nNonbearing(carolan)\nTemperate(carolan)\nOnly(roze)\nStupefying(roze)\nOnly(sammie)\nCriterial(sammie)\nOchre(sammie)\nLasting(sammie)\nNonbearing(sammie)\nStupefying(sammie)\nTemperate(sammie)\nforall x (Lasting(x) -> Stupefying(x))\nforall x (Only(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Ochre(x) and Criterial(x) -> Temperate(x))\nforall x (Lasting(x) and Temperate(x) -> Criterial(x))\nforall x (Stupefying(x) -> Nonbearing(x))\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) and Lasting(x) -> Criterial(x))\n\nCriterial(devonna)\n\nLasting(devonna) and forall x (Lasting(x) -> Stupefying(x)) -> therefore Stupefying(devonna) Stupefying(devonna) and forall x (Stupefying(x) -> Nonbearing(x)) -> therefore Nonbearing(devonna) Nonbearing(devonna) and Lasting(devonna) and forall x (Nonbearing(x) and Lasting(x) -> Criterial(x)) -> therefore Criterial(devonna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Ilene is sheeplike. Ilene is prejudiced. Florenza is live. Florenza is adiabatic. Florenza is prejudiced. Florenza is burked. Florenza is precise. Dusty is live. Dusty is wily. Osbert is live. Osbert is adiabatic. Osbert is sheeplike. Osbert is prejudiced. Osbert is burked. Osbert is wily. Osbert is precise. If someone is prejudiced then they are wily. Blue people are adiabatic. If someone is sheeplike and adiabatic then they are precise. Round, precise people are adiabatic. All wily people are burked. Smart, prejudiced people are adiabatic. Ilene is not adiabatic.", "logic": "\nSheeplike(ilene)\nPrejudiced(ilene)\nLive(florenza)\nAdiabatic(florenza)\nPrejudiced(florenza)\nBurked(florenza)\nPrecise(florenza)\nLive(dusty)\nWily(dusty)\nLive(osbert)\nAdiabatic(osbert)\nSheeplike(osbert)\nPrejudiced(osbert)\nBurked(osbert)\nWily(osbert)\nPrecise(osbert)\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Live(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Sheeplike(x) and Adiabatic(x) -> Precise(x))\nforall x (Prejudiced(x) and Precise(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Burked(x))\nforall x (Burked(x) and Prejudiced(x) -> Adiabatic(x))\n\nnot Adiabatic(ilene)\n\nPrejudiced(ilene) and forall x (Prejudiced(x) -> Wily(x)) -> therefore Wily(ilene) Wily(ilene) and forall x (Wily(x) -> Burked(x)) -> therefore Burked(ilene) Burked(ilene) and Prejudiced(ilene) and forall x (Burked(x) and Prejudiced(x) -> Adiabatic(x)) -> therefore Adiabatic(ilene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "France is lively. France is crinkly. Chanda is sinkable. Chanda is unmedical. Chanda is crinkly. Chanda is seljuk. Chanda is inductive. Duffie is sinkable. Duffie is biographic. Neron is sinkable. Neron is unmedical. Neron is lively. Neron is crinkly. Neron is seljuk. Neron is biographic. Neron is inductive. If someone is crinkly then they are biographic. Blue people are unmedical. If someone is lively and unmedical then they are inductive. Round, inductive people are unmedical. All biographic people are seljuk. Smart, crinkly people are unmedical. Duffie is not inductive.", "logic": "\nLively(france)\nCrinkly(france)\nSinkable(chanda)\nUnmedical(chanda)\nCrinkly(chanda)\nSeljuk(chanda)\nInductive(chanda)\nSinkable(duffie)\nBiographic(duffie)\nSinkable(neron)\nUnmedical(neron)\nLively(neron)\nCrinkly(neron)\nSeljuk(neron)\nBiographic(neron)\nInductive(neron)\nforall x (Crinkly(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Sinkable(x) -> Unmedical(x))\nforall x (Lively(x) and Unmedical(x) -> Inductive(x))\nforall x (Crinkly(x) and Inductive(x) -> Unmedical(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Seljuk(x))\nforall x (Seljuk(x) and Crinkly(x) -> Unmedical(x))\n\nnot Inductive(duffie)\n\nforall x (Lively(x) and Unmedical(x) -> Inductive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Kiley is plundering. Kiley is amyloidal. Marigold is manifold. Marigold is reliant. Marigold is amyloidal. Marigold is allometric. Marigold is mesenteric. Merilyn is manifold. Merilyn is yogic. Jennilee is manifold. Jennilee is reliant. Jennilee is plundering. Jennilee is amyloidal. Jennilee is allometric. Jennilee is yogic. Jennilee is mesenteric. If someone is amyloidal then they are yogic. Blue people are reliant. If someone is plundering and reliant then they are mesenteric. Round, mesenteric people are reliant. All yogic people are allometric. Smart, amyloidal people are reliant. Marigold is plundering.", "logic": "\nPlundering(kiley)\nAmyloidal(kiley)\nManifold(marigold)\nReliant(marigold)\nAmyloidal(marigold)\nAllometric(marigold)\nMesenteric(marigold)\nManifold(merilyn)\nYogic(merilyn)\nManifold(jennilee)\nReliant(jennilee)\nPlundering(jennilee)\nAmyloidal(jennilee)\nAllometric(jennilee)\nYogic(jennilee)\nMesenteric(jennilee)\nforall x (Amyloidal(x) -> Yogic(x))\nforall x (Manifold(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Plundering(x) and Reliant(x) -> Mesenteric(x))\nforall x (Amyloidal(x) and Mesenteric(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Allometric(x))\nforall x (Allometric(x) and Amyloidal(x) -> Reliant(x))\n\nPlundering(marigold)\n\nPlundering(marigold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Price is manic. Price is polar. Gennie is permanent. Gennie is rheumy. Gennie is polar. Gennie is soldierly. Gennie is rainproof. Nevin is permanent. Nevin is benefic. Ailyn is permanent. Ailyn is rheumy. Ailyn is manic. Ailyn is polar. Ailyn is soldierly. Ailyn is benefic. Ailyn is rainproof. If someone is polar then they are benefic. Blue people are rheumy. If someone is manic and rheumy then they are rainproof. Round, rainproof people are rheumy. All benefic people are soldierly. Smart, polar people are rheumy. Nevin is not polar.", "logic": "\nManic(price)\nPolar(price)\nPermanent(gennie)\nRheumy(gennie)\nPolar(gennie)\nSoldierly(gennie)\nRainproof(gennie)\nPermanent(nevin)\nBenefic(nevin)\nPermanent(ailyn)\nRheumy(ailyn)\nManic(ailyn)\nPolar(ailyn)\nSoldierly(ailyn)\nBenefic(ailyn)\nRainproof(ailyn)\nforall x (Polar(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Manic(x) and Rheumy(x) -> Rainproof(x))\nforall x (Polar(x) and Rainproof(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Benefic(x) -> Soldierly(x))\nforall x (Soldierly(x) and Polar(x) -> Rheumy(x))\n\nnot Polar(nevin)\n\nnot Polar(nevin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "Halie is unmolested. Halie is uncaused. Frannie is unexcelled. Frannie is unmediated. Frannie is uncaused. Frannie is unaired. Frannie is reigning. Pris is unexcelled. Pris is disunited. Arleyne is unexcelled. Arleyne is unmediated. Arleyne is unmolested. Arleyne is uncaused. Arleyne is unaired. Arleyne is disunited. Arleyne is reigning. If someone is uncaused then they are disunited. Blue people are unmediated. If someone is unmolested and unmediated then they are reigning. Round, reigning people are unmediated. All disunited people are unaired. Smart, uncaused people are unmediated. Pris is unmolested.", "logic": "\nUnmolested(halie)\nUncaused(halie)\nUnexcelled(frannie)\nUnmediated(frannie)\nUncaused(frannie)\nUnaired(frannie)\nReigning(frannie)\nUnexcelled(pris)\nDisunited(pris)\nUnexcelled(arleyne)\nUnmediated(arleyne)\nUnmolested(arleyne)\nUncaused(arleyne)\nUnaired(arleyne)\nDisunited(arleyne)\nReigning(arleyne)\nforall x (Uncaused(x) -> Disunited(x))\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Unmediated(x))\nforall x (Unmolested(x) and Unmediated(x) -> Reigning(x))\nforall x (Uncaused(x) and Reigning(x) -> Unmediated(x))\nforall x (Disunited(x) -> Unaired(x))\nforall x (Unaired(x) and Uncaused(x) -> Unmediated(x))\n\nUnmolested(pris)\n\nUnmolested(pris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-946"} {"premises": "The lorianne is quadruped. The lorianne is militant. The lorianne is skirting. The lorianne is empyrean. The lorianne is syllabic. All quadruped, skirting things are empyrean. If the lorianne is not syllabic then the lorianne is not skirting. The lorianne is quadruped.", "logic": "\nQuadruped(lorianne)\nMilitant(lorianne)\nSkirting(lorianne)\nEmpyrean(lorianne)\nSyllabic(lorianne)\nforall x (Quadruped(x) and Skirting(x) -> Empyrean(x))\nnot Syllabic(lorianne) -> not Skirting(lorianne)\n\nQuadruped(lorianne)\n\ntherefore Quadruped(lorianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-930"} {"premises": "The trever is specked. The trever is blunt. The trever is oxidised. The trever is relevant. The trever is dionysian. All specked, oxidised things are relevant. If the trever is not dionysian then the trever is not oxidised. The trever is not specked.", "logic": "\nSpecked(trever)\nBlunt(trever)\nOxidised(trever)\nRelevant(trever)\nDionysian(trever)\nforall x (Specked(x) and Oxidised(x) -> Relevant(x))\nnot Dionysian(trever) -> not Oxidised(trever)\n\nnot Specked(trever)\n\ntherefore Specked(trever)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-930"} {"premises": "The isahella is unsaved. The isahella is unprompted. The isahella is pockmarked. The isahella is ecdemic. The isahella is totalistic. All unsaved, pockmarked things are ecdemic. If the isahella is not totalistic then the isahella is not pockmarked. The isahella does not see the isahella.", "logic": "\nUnsaved(isahella)\nUnprompted(isahella)\nPockmarked(isahella)\nEcdemic(isahella)\nTotalistic(isahella)\nforall x (Unsaved(x) and Pockmarked(x) -> Ecdemic(x))\nnot Totalistic(isahella) -> not Pockmarked(isahella)\n\nnot Sees(isahella, isahella)\n\nnot Sees(isahella, isahella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-930"} {"premises": "The josefa is bronchitic. The josefa is aguish. The josefa is stenotic. The josefa is separable. The josefa is played. All bronchitic, stenotic things are separable. If the josefa is not played then the josefa is not stenotic. The josefa likes the josefa.", "logic": "\nBronchitic(josefa)\nAguish(josefa)\nStenotic(josefa)\nSeparable(josefa)\nPlayed(josefa)\nforall x (Bronchitic(x) and Stenotic(x) -> Separable(x))\nnot Played(josefa) -> not Stenotic(josefa)\n\nLikes(josefa, josefa)\n\nLikes(josefa, josefa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-930"} {"premises": "The heloise is debile. The heloise vaccinate the jeanelle. The donald vaccinate the heloise. The emmanuel is debile. The jeanelle is not cheerful. The jeanelle kindle the heloise. The jeanelle vaccinate the donald. If someone vaccinate the donald then they visit the heloise. If someone vaccinate the donald and they do not need the jeanelle then the jeanelle reaffirm the heloise. If someone reaffirm the donald then the donald is allegretto. If someone kindle the heloise and the heloise vaccinate the jeanelle then they visit the emmanuel. If the jeanelle reaffirm the donald then the jeanelle is agreeable. If someone vaccinate the emmanuel then the emmanuel reaffirm the donald. The emmanuel is debile.", "logic": "\nDebile(heloise)\nVaccinate(heloise, jeanelle)\nVaccinate(donald, heloise)\nDebile(emmanuel)\nnot Cheerful(jeanelle)\nKindle(jeanelle, heloise)\nVaccinate(jeanelle, donald)\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, donald) -> Vaccinate(x, heloise))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, donald) and not Kindle(x, jeanelle) -> Reaffirm(jeanelle, heloise))\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, donald) -> Allegretto(donald))\nforall x (Kindle(x, heloise) and Vaccinate(heloise, jeanelle) -> Vaccinate(x, emmanuel))\nReaffirm(jeanelle, donald) -> Agreeable(jeanelle)\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, emmanuel) -> Reaffirm(emmanuel, donald))\n\nDebile(emmanuel)\n\ntherefore Debile(emmanuel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The west is amylaceous. The west manage the stanley. The mohan manage the west. The gabriel is amylaceous. The stanley is not accessory. The stanley doubt the west. The stanley manage the mohan. If someone manage the mohan then they visit the west. If someone manage the mohan and they do not need the stanley then the stanley beat the west. If someone beat the mohan then the mohan is goodish. If someone doubt the west and the west manage the stanley then they visit the gabriel. If the stanley beat the mohan then the stanley is nonracial. If someone manage the gabriel then the gabriel beat the mohan. The stanley does not need the west.", "logic": "\nAmylaceous(west)\nManage(west, stanley)\nManage(mohan, west)\nAmylaceous(gabriel)\nnot Accessory(stanley)\nDoubt(stanley, west)\nManage(stanley, mohan)\nforall x (Manage(x, mohan) -> Manage(x, west))\nforall x (Manage(x, mohan) and not Doubt(x, stanley) -> Beat(stanley, west))\nforall x (Beat(x, mohan) -> Goodish(mohan))\nforall x (Doubt(x, west) and Manage(west, stanley) -> Manage(x, gabriel))\nBeat(stanley, mohan) -> Nonracial(stanley)\nforall x (Manage(x, gabriel) -> Beat(gabriel, mohan))\n\nnot Doubt(stanley, west)\n\ntherefore Doubt(stanley, west)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The lesli is obviating. The lesli brisken the lenny. The annamari brisken the lesli. The sabine is obviating. The lenny is not inborn. The lenny embrace the lesli. The lenny brisken the annamari. If someone brisken the annamari then they visit the lesli. If someone brisken the annamari and they do not need the lenny then the lenny energize the lesli. If someone energize the annamari then the annamari is unendowed. If someone embrace the lesli and the lesli brisken the lenny then they visit the sabine. If the lenny energize the annamari then the lenny is kept. If someone brisken the sabine then the sabine energize the annamari. The lenny brisken the lesli.", "logic": "\nObviating(lesli)\nBrisken(lesli, lenny)\nBrisken(annamari, lesli)\nObviating(sabine)\nnot Inborn(lenny)\nEmbrace(lenny, lesli)\nBrisken(lenny, annamari)\nforall x (Brisken(x, annamari) -> Brisken(x, lesli))\nforall x (Brisken(x, annamari) and not Embrace(x, lenny) -> Energize(lenny, lesli))\nforall x (Energize(x, annamari) -> Unendowed(annamari))\nforall x (Embrace(x, lesli) and Brisken(lesli, lenny) -> Brisken(x, sabine))\nEnergize(lenny, annamari) -> Kept(lenny)\nforall x (Brisken(x, sabine) -> Energize(sabine, annamari))\n\nBrisken(lenny, lesli)\n\nBrisken(lenny, annamari) and forall x (Brisken(x, annamari) -> Brisken(x, lesli)) -> therefore Brisken(lenny, lesli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The delila is tomboyish. The delila hurry the pyotr. The isobel hurry the delila. The lea is tomboyish. The pyotr is not namibian. The pyotr tally the delila. The pyotr hurry the isobel. If someone hurry the isobel then they visit the delila. If someone hurry the isobel and they do not need the pyotr then the pyotr punctuate the delila. If someone punctuate the isobel then the isobel is beefy. If someone tally the delila and the delila hurry the pyotr then they visit the lea. If the pyotr punctuate the isobel then the pyotr is beauteous. If someone hurry the lea then the lea punctuate the isobel. The pyotr does not visit the lea.", "logic": "\nTomboyish(delila)\nHurry(delila, pyotr)\nHurry(isobel, delila)\nTomboyish(lea)\nnot Namibian(pyotr)\nTally(pyotr, delila)\nHurry(pyotr, isobel)\nforall x (Hurry(x, isobel) -> Hurry(x, delila))\nforall x (Hurry(x, isobel) and not Tally(x, pyotr) -> Punctuate(pyotr, delila))\nforall x (Punctuate(x, isobel) -> Beefy(isobel))\nforall x (Tally(x, delila) and Hurry(delila, pyotr) -> Hurry(x, lea))\nPunctuate(pyotr, isobel) -> Beauteous(pyotr)\nforall x (Hurry(x, lea) -> Punctuate(lea, isobel))\n\nnot Hurry(pyotr, lea)\n\nTally(pyotr, delila) and Hurry(delila, pyotr) and forall x (Tally(x, delila) and Hurry(delila, pyotr) -> Hurry(x, lea)) -> therefore Hurry(pyotr, lea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The tarrah is rattled. The tarrah stand the francene. The dorri stand the tarrah. The rhett is rattled. The francene is not humanistic. The francene roneo the tarrah. The francene stand the dorri. If someone stand the dorri then they visit the tarrah. If someone stand the dorri and they do not need the francene then the francene permute the tarrah. If someone permute the dorri then the dorri is expectable. If someone roneo the tarrah and the tarrah stand the francene then they visit the rhett. If the francene permute the dorri then the francene is corvine. If someone stand the rhett then the rhett permute the dorri. The rhett permute the dorri.", "logic": "\nRattled(tarrah)\nStand(tarrah, francene)\nStand(dorri, tarrah)\nRattled(rhett)\nnot Humanistic(francene)\nRoneo(francene, tarrah)\nStand(francene, dorri)\nforall x (Stand(x, dorri) -> Stand(x, tarrah))\nforall x (Stand(x, dorri) and not Roneo(x, francene) -> Permute(francene, tarrah))\nforall x (Permute(x, dorri) -> Expectable(dorri))\nforall x (Roneo(x, tarrah) and Stand(tarrah, francene) -> Stand(x, rhett))\nPermute(francene, dorri) -> Corvine(francene)\nforall x (Stand(x, rhett) -> Permute(rhett, dorri))\n\nPermute(rhett, dorri)\n\nRoneo(francene, tarrah) and Stand(tarrah, francene) and forall x (Roneo(x, tarrah) and Stand(tarrah, francene) -> Stand(x, rhett)) -> therefore Stand(francene, rhett) Stand(francene, rhett) and forall x (Stand(x, rhett) -> Permute(rhett, dorri)) -> therefore Permute(rhett, dorri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The erminia is acoustical. The erminia decimalize the ekaterina. The elyse decimalize the erminia. The woodie is acoustical. The ekaterina is not burnt. The ekaterina beef the erminia. The ekaterina decimalize the elyse. If someone decimalize the elyse then they visit the erminia. If someone decimalize the elyse and they do not need the ekaterina then the ekaterina twine the erminia. If someone twine the elyse then the elyse is unladylike. If someone beef the erminia and the erminia decimalize the ekaterina then they visit the woodie. If the ekaterina twine the elyse then the ekaterina is undreamt. If someone decimalize the woodie then the woodie twine the elyse. The woodie does not see the elyse.", "logic": "\nAcoustical(erminia)\nDecimalize(erminia, ekaterina)\nDecimalize(elyse, erminia)\nAcoustical(woodie)\nnot Burnt(ekaterina)\nBeef(ekaterina, erminia)\nDecimalize(ekaterina, elyse)\nforall x (Decimalize(x, elyse) -> Decimalize(x, erminia))\nforall x (Decimalize(x, elyse) and not Beef(x, ekaterina) -> Twine(ekaterina, erminia))\nforall x (Twine(x, elyse) -> Unladylike(elyse))\nforall x (Beef(x, erminia) and Decimalize(erminia, ekaterina) -> Decimalize(x, woodie))\nTwine(ekaterina, elyse) -> Undreamt(ekaterina)\nforall x (Decimalize(x, woodie) -> Twine(woodie, elyse))\n\nnot Twine(woodie, elyse)\n\nBeef(ekaterina, erminia) and Decimalize(erminia, ekaterina) and forall x (Beef(x, erminia) and Decimalize(erminia, ekaterina) -> Decimalize(x, woodie)) -> therefore Decimalize(ekaterina, woodie) Decimalize(ekaterina, woodie) and forall x (Decimalize(x, woodie) -> Twine(woodie, elyse)) -> therefore Twine(woodie, elyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The jeremie is fagged. The jeremie fantasize the ambrose. The breena fantasize the jeremie. The casi is fagged. The ambrose is not devoid. The ambrose laugh the jeremie. The ambrose fantasize the breena. If someone fantasize the breena then they visit the jeremie. If someone fantasize the breena and they do not need the ambrose then the ambrose reread the jeremie. If someone reread the breena then the breena is diarrheal. If someone laugh the jeremie and the jeremie fantasize the ambrose then they visit the casi. If the ambrose reread the breena then the ambrose is fossil. If someone fantasize the casi then the casi reread the breena. The breena is diarrheal.", "logic": "\nFagged(jeremie)\nFantasize(jeremie, ambrose)\nFantasize(breena, jeremie)\nFagged(casi)\nnot Devoid(ambrose)\nLaugh(ambrose, jeremie)\nFantasize(ambrose, breena)\nforall x (Fantasize(x, breena) -> Fantasize(x, jeremie))\nforall x (Fantasize(x, breena) and not Laugh(x, ambrose) -> Reread(ambrose, jeremie))\nforall x (Reread(x, breena) -> Diarrheal(breena))\nforall x (Laugh(x, jeremie) and Fantasize(jeremie, ambrose) -> Fantasize(x, casi))\nReread(ambrose, breena) -> Fossil(ambrose)\nforall x (Fantasize(x, casi) -> Reread(casi, breena))\n\nDiarrheal(breena)\n\nLaugh(ambrose, jeremie) and Fantasize(jeremie, ambrose) and forall x (Laugh(x, jeremie) and Fantasize(jeremie, ambrose) -> Fantasize(x, casi)) -> therefore Fantasize(ambrose, casi) Fantasize(ambrose, casi) and forall x (Fantasize(x, casi) -> Reread(casi, breena)) -> therefore Reread(casi, breena) Reread(casi, breena) and forall x (Reread(x, breena) -> Diarrheal(breena)) -> therefore Diarrheal(breena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The lynda is welcoming. The lynda featherbed the ernst. The garfield featherbed the lynda. The francisco is welcoming. The ernst is not prone. The ernst wring the lynda. The ernst featherbed the garfield. If someone featherbed the garfield then they visit the lynda. If someone featherbed the garfield and they do not need the ernst then the ernst forestall the lynda. If someone forestall the garfield then the garfield is spattered. If someone wring the lynda and the lynda featherbed the ernst then they visit the francisco. If the ernst forestall the garfield then the ernst is zillion. If someone featherbed the francisco then the francisco forestall the garfield. The garfield is not spattered.", "logic": "\nWelcoming(lynda)\nFeatherbed(lynda, ernst)\nFeatherbed(garfield, lynda)\nWelcoming(francisco)\nnot Prone(ernst)\nWring(ernst, lynda)\nFeatherbed(ernst, garfield)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, garfield) -> Featherbed(x, lynda))\nforall x (Featherbed(x, garfield) and not Wring(x, ernst) -> Forestall(ernst, lynda))\nforall x (Forestall(x, garfield) -> Spattered(garfield))\nforall x (Wring(x, lynda) and Featherbed(lynda, ernst) -> Featherbed(x, francisco))\nForestall(ernst, garfield) -> Zillion(ernst)\nforall x (Featherbed(x, francisco) -> Forestall(francisco, garfield))\n\nnot Spattered(garfield)\n\nWring(ernst, lynda) and Featherbed(lynda, ernst) and forall x (Wring(x, lynda) and Featherbed(lynda, ernst) -> Featherbed(x, francisco)) -> therefore Featherbed(ernst, francisco) Featherbed(ernst, francisco) and forall x (Featherbed(x, francisco) -> Forestall(francisco, garfield)) -> therefore Forestall(francisco, garfield) Forestall(francisco, garfield) and forall x (Forestall(x, garfield) -> Spattered(garfield)) -> therefore Spattered(garfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The jennee is murdered. The jennee overact the elisa. The zacherie overact the jennee. The kippie is murdered. The elisa is not undulate. The elisa sideline the jennee. The elisa overact the zacherie. If someone overact the zacherie then they visit the jennee. If someone overact the zacherie and they do not need the elisa then the elisa novelise the jennee. If someone novelise the zacherie then the zacherie is monolithic. If someone sideline the jennee and the jennee overact the elisa then they visit the kippie. If the elisa novelise the zacherie then the elisa is handheld. If someone overact the kippie then the kippie novelise the zacherie. The zacherie does not visit the kippie.", "logic": "\nMurdered(jennee)\nOveract(jennee, elisa)\nOveract(zacherie, jennee)\nMurdered(kippie)\nnot Undulate(elisa)\nSideline(elisa, jennee)\nOveract(elisa, zacherie)\nforall x (Overact(x, zacherie) -> Overact(x, jennee))\nforall x (Overact(x, zacherie) and not Sideline(x, elisa) -> Novelise(elisa, jennee))\nforall x (Novelise(x, zacherie) -> Monolithic(zacherie))\nforall x (Sideline(x, jennee) and Overact(jennee, elisa) -> Overact(x, kippie))\nNovelise(elisa, zacherie) -> Handheld(elisa)\nforall x (Overact(x, kippie) -> Novelise(kippie, zacherie))\n\nnot Overact(zacherie, kippie)\n\nforall x (Sideline(x, jennee) and Overact(jennee, elisa) -> Overact(x, kippie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The sarette is prompt. The sarette aromatize the madlin. The mellicent aromatize the sarette. The spiros is prompt. The madlin is not brunet. The madlin leach the sarette. The madlin aromatize the mellicent. If someone aromatize the mellicent then they visit the sarette. If someone aromatize the mellicent and they do not need the madlin then the madlin capriole the sarette. If someone capriole the mellicent then the mellicent is verminous. If someone leach the sarette and the sarette aromatize the madlin then they visit the spiros. If the madlin capriole the mellicent then the madlin is indoor. If someone aromatize the spiros then the spiros capriole the mellicent. The sarette aromatize the sarette.", "logic": "\nPrompt(sarette)\nAromatize(sarette, madlin)\nAromatize(mellicent, sarette)\nPrompt(spiros)\nnot Brunet(madlin)\nLeach(madlin, sarette)\nAromatize(madlin, mellicent)\nforall x (Aromatize(x, mellicent) -> Aromatize(x, sarette))\nforall x (Aromatize(x, mellicent) and not Leach(x, madlin) -> Capriole(madlin, sarette))\nforall x (Capriole(x, mellicent) -> Verminous(mellicent))\nforall x (Leach(x, sarette) and Aromatize(sarette, madlin) -> Aromatize(x, spiros))\nCapriole(madlin, mellicent) -> Indoor(madlin)\nforall x (Aromatize(x, spiros) -> Capriole(spiros, mellicent))\n\nAromatize(sarette, sarette)\n\nforall x (Aromatize(x, mellicent) -> Aromatize(x, sarette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The hogan is saharan. The hogan overstay the harrietta. The marsha overstay the hogan. The lark is saharan. The harrietta is not nicaean. The harrietta homogenise the hogan. The harrietta overstay the marsha. If someone overstay the marsha then they visit the hogan. If someone overstay the marsha and they do not need the harrietta then the harrietta aggravate the hogan. If someone aggravate the marsha then the marsha is shady. If someone homogenise the hogan and the hogan overstay the harrietta then they visit the lark. If the harrietta aggravate the marsha then the harrietta is obsolete. If someone overstay the lark then the lark aggravate the marsha. The harrietta is not obsolete.", "logic": "\nSaharan(hogan)\nOverstay(hogan, harrietta)\nOverstay(marsha, hogan)\nSaharan(lark)\nnot Nicaean(harrietta)\nHomogenise(harrietta, hogan)\nOverstay(harrietta, marsha)\nforall x (Overstay(x, marsha) -> Overstay(x, hogan))\nforall x (Overstay(x, marsha) and not Homogenise(x, harrietta) -> Aggravate(harrietta, hogan))\nforall x (Aggravate(x, marsha) -> Shady(marsha))\nforall x (Homogenise(x, hogan) and Overstay(hogan, harrietta) -> Overstay(x, lark))\nAggravate(harrietta, marsha) -> Obsolete(harrietta)\nforall x (Overstay(x, lark) -> Aggravate(lark, marsha))\n\nnot Obsolete(harrietta)\n\nAggravate(harrietta, marsha) -> Obsolete(harrietta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The archon is xeric. The archon descale the kalvin. The cosetta descale the archon. The pepita is xeric. The kalvin is not thinned. The kalvin instance the archon. The kalvin descale the cosetta. If someone descale the cosetta then they visit the archon. If someone descale the cosetta and they do not need the kalvin then the kalvin rock the archon. If someone rock the cosetta then the cosetta is vitrified. If someone instance the archon and the archon descale the kalvin then they visit the pepita. If the kalvin rock the cosetta then the kalvin is selfless. If someone descale the pepita then the pepita rock the cosetta. The archon descale the pepita.", "logic": "\nXeric(archon)\nDescale(archon, kalvin)\nDescale(cosetta, archon)\nXeric(pepita)\nnot Thinned(kalvin)\nInstance(kalvin, archon)\nDescale(kalvin, cosetta)\nforall x (Descale(x, cosetta) -> Descale(x, archon))\nforall x (Descale(x, cosetta) and not Instance(x, kalvin) -> Rock(kalvin, archon))\nforall x (Rock(x, cosetta) -> Vitrified(cosetta))\nforall x (Instance(x, archon) and Descale(archon, kalvin) -> Descale(x, pepita))\nRock(kalvin, cosetta) -> Selfless(kalvin)\nforall x (Descale(x, pepita) -> Rock(pepita, cosetta))\n\nDescale(archon, pepita)\n\nforall x (Instance(x, archon) and Descale(archon, kalvin) -> Descale(x, pepita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The katharina is angelical. The katharina combine the batsheva. The wilfrid combine the katharina. The orin is angelical. The batsheva is not spartan. The batsheva malversate the katharina. The batsheva combine the wilfrid. If someone combine the wilfrid then they visit the katharina. If someone combine the wilfrid and they do not need the batsheva then the batsheva boomerang the katharina. If someone boomerang the wilfrid then the wilfrid is amnestic. If someone malversate the katharina and the katharina combine the batsheva then they visit the orin. If the batsheva boomerang the wilfrid then the batsheva is planted. If someone combine the orin then the orin boomerang the wilfrid. The katharina does not need the wilfrid.", "logic": "\nAngelical(katharina)\nCombine(katharina, batsheva)\nCombine(wilfrid, katharina)\nAngelical(orin)\nnot Spartan(batsheva)\nMalversate(batsheva, katharina)\nCombine(batsheva, wilfrid)\nforall x (Combine(x, wilfrid) -> Combine(x, katharina))\nforall x (Combine(x, wilfrid) and not Malversate(x, batsheva) -> Boomerang(batsheva, katharina))\nforall x (Boomerang(x, wilfrid) -> Amnestic(wilfrid))\nforall x (Malversate(x, katharina) and Combine(katharina, batsheva) -> Combine(x, orin))\nBoomerang(batsheva, wilfrid) -> Planted(batsheva)\nforall x (Combine(x, orin) -> Boomerang(orin, wilfrid))\n\nnot Malversate(katharina, wilfrid)\n\nnot Malversate(katharina, wilfrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The chevy is jesuit. The chevy follow the tedman. The rhody follow the chevy. The malcolm is jesuit. The tedman is not uncurved. The tedman pepper the chevy. The tedman follow the rhody. If someone follow the rhody then they visit the chevy. If someone follow the rhody and they do not need the tedman then the tedman sicken the chevy. If someone sicken the rhody then the rhody is sinhalese. If someone pepper the chevy and the chevy follow the tedman then they visit the malcolm. If the tedman sicken the rhody then the tedman is arsenious. If someone follow the malcolm then the malcolm sicken the rhody. The tedman sicken the rhody.", "logic": "\nJesuit(chevy)\nFollow(chevy, tedman)\nFollow(rhody, chevy)\nJesuit(malcolm)\nnot Uncurved(tedman)\nPepper(tedman, chevy)\nFollow(tedman, rhody)\nforall x (Follow(x, rhody) -> Follow(x, chevy))\nforall x (Follow(x, rhody) and not Pepper(x, tedman) -> Sicken(tedman, chevy))\nforall x (Sicken(x, rhody) -> Sinhalese(rhody))\nforall x (Pepper(x, chevy) and Follow(chevy, tedman) -> Follow(x, malcolm))\nSicken(tedman, rhody) -> Arsenious(tedman)\nforall x (Follow(x, malcolm) -> Sicken(malcolm, rhody))\n\nSicken(tedman, rhody)\n\nSicken(tedman, rhody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The skipton is soviet. The skipton slacken the mallorie. The rosana slacken the skipton. The amy is soviet. The mallorie is not stimulated. The mallorie avow the skipton. The mallorie slacken the rosana. If someone slacken the rosana then they visit the skipton. If someone slacken the rosana and they do not need the mallorie then the mallorie brandmark the skipton. If someone brandmark the rosana then the rosana is unaired. If someone avow the skipton and the skipton slacken the mallorie then they visit the amy. If the mallorie brandmark the rosana then the mallorie is handsome. If someone slacken the amy then the amy brandmark the rosana. The rosana is not handsome.", "logic": "\nSoviet(skipton)\nSlacken(skipton, mallorie)\nSlacken(rosana, skipton)\nSoviet(amy)\nnot Stimulated(mallorie)\nAvow(mallorie, skipton)\nSlacken(mallorie, rosana)\nforall x (Slacken(x, rosana) -> Slacken(x, skipton))\nforall x (Slacken(x, rosana) and not Avow(x, mallorie) -> Brandmark(mallorie, skipton))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, rosana) -> Unaired(rosana))\nforall x (Avow(x, skipton) and Slacken(skipton, mallorie) -> Slacken(x, amy))\nBrandmark(mallorie, rosana) -> Handsome(mallorie)\nforall x (Slacken(x, amy) -> Brandmark(amy, rosana))\n\nnot Handsome(rosana)\n\nnot Handsome(rosana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "The alexandra is evocative. The alexandra burp the carlotta. The koo burp the alexandra. The alberto is evocative. The carlotta is not expiratory. The carlotta inspire the alexandra. The carlotta burp the koo. If someone burp the koo then they visit the alexandra. If someone burp the koo and they do not need the carlotta then the carlotta disjoin the alexandra. If someone disjoin the koo then the koo is bustling. If someone inspire the alexandra and the alexandra burp the carlotta then they visit the alberto. If the carlotta disjoin the koo then the carlotta is belated. If someone burp the alberto then the alberto disjoin the koo. The alexandra inspire the alexandra.", "logic": "\nEvocative(alexandra)\nBurp(alexandra, carlotta)\nBurp(koo, alexandra)\nEvocative(alberto)\nnot Expiratory(carlotta)\nInspire(carlotta, alexandra)\nBurp(carlotta, koo)\nforall x (Burp(x, koo) -> Burp(x, alexandra))\nforall x (Burp(x, koo) and not Inspire(x, carlotta) -> Disjoin(carlotta, alexandra))\nforall x (Disjoin(x, koo) -> Bustling(koo))\nforall x (Inspire(x, alexandra) and Burp(alexandra, carlotta) -> Burp(x, alberto))\nDisjoin(carlotta, koo) -> Belated(carlotta)\nforall x (Burp(x, alberto) -> Disjoin(alberto, koo))\n\nInspire(alexandra, alexandra)\n\nInspire(alexandra, alexandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1519"} {"premises": "Davy is fallible. Sholom is stannous. If Davy is queenlike and Davy is exuvial then Davy is stannous. Smart things are discoid. All fallible things are discoid. If something is queenlike then it is fallible. All stannous things are queenlike. All exuvial things are queenlike. Blue things are queenlike. Cold, queenlike things are stannous. Davy is fallible.", "logic": "\nFallible(davy)\nStannous(sholom)\nQueenlike(davy) and Exuvial(davy) -> Stannous(davy)\nforall x (Stannous(x) -> Discoid(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> Discoid(x))\nforall x (Queenlike(x) -> Fallible(x))\nforall x (Stannous(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Exuvial(x) -> Queenlike(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Queenlike(x) -> Stannous(x))\n\nFallible(davy)\n\ntherefore Fallible(davy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "Yardley is patented. Nerti is extendable. If Yardley is suntanned and Yardley is cowardly then Yardley is extendable. Smart things are migrant. All patented things are migrant. If something is suntanned then it is patented. All extendable things are suntanned. All cowardly things are suntanned. Blue things are suntanned. Cold, suntanned things are extendable. Nerti is not extendable.", "logic": "\nPatented(yardley)\nExtendable(nerti)\nSuntanned(yardley) and Cowardly(yardley) -> Extendable(yardley)\nforall x (Extendable(x) -> Migrant(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) -> Migrant(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Extendable(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) and Suntanned(x) -> Extendable(x))\n\nnot Extendable(nerti)\n\ntherefore Extendable(nerti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "Kary is unread. Kare is peripheral. If Kary is randomised and Kary is haploidic then Kary is peripheral. Smart things are deweyan. All unread things are deweyan. If something is randomised then it is unread. All peripheral things are randomised. All haploidic things are randomised. Blue things are randomised. Cold, randomised things are peripheral. Kare is deweyan.", "logic": "\nUnread(kary)\nPeripheral(kare)\nRandomised(kary) and Haploidic(kary) -> Peripheral(kary)\nforall x (Peripheral(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Unread(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> Unread(x))\nforall x (Peripheral(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Unread(x) and Randomised(x) -> Peripheral(x))\n\nDeweyan(kare)\n\nPeripheral(kare) and forall x (Peripheral(x) -> Deweyan(x)) -> therefore Deweyan(kare)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "Mirella is bulgarian. Selina is inhabited. If Mirella is cardiac and Mirella is rubberlike then Mirella is inhabited. Smart things are ascribable. All bulgarian things are ascribable. If something is cardiac then it is bulgarian. All inhabited things are cardiac. All rubberlike things are cardiac. Blue things are cardiac. Cold, cardiac things are inhabited. Selina is not cardiac.", "logic": "\nBulgarian(mirella)\nInhabited(selina)\nCardiac(mirella) and Rubberlike(mirella) -> Inhabited(mirella)\nforall x (Inhabited(x) -> Ascribable(x))\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) -> Ascribable(x))\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Bulgarian(x))\nforall x (Inhabited(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Rubberlike(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Rubberlike(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) and Cardiac(x) -> Inhabited(x))\n\nnot Cardiac(selina)\n\nInhabited(selina) and forall x (Inhabited(x) -> Cardiac(x)) -> therefore Cardiac(selina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "Gwenora is proximate. Barthel is toothy. If Gwenora is arid and Gwenora is pitched then Gwenora is toothy. Smart things are cleavable. All proximate things are cleavable. If something is arid then it is proximate. All toothy things are arid. All pitched things are arid. Blue things are arid. Cold, arid things are toothy. Gwenora is not arid.", "logic": "\nProximate(gwenora)\nToothy(barthel)\nArid(gwenora) and Pitched(gwenora) -> Toothy(gwenora)\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Arid(x) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Arid(x))\nforall x (Pitched(x) -> Arid(x))\nforall x (Pitched(x) -> Arid(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) and Arid(x) -> Toothy(x))\n\nnot Arid(gwenora)\n\nforall x (Toothy(x) -> Arid(x)) <- forall x (Proximate(x) and Arid(x) -> Toothy(x)) <- forall x (Pitched(x) -> Arid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "Sergent is motivative. Nev is bewitching. If Sergent is buff and Sergent is stalked then Sergent is bewitching. Smart things are squeaking. All motivative things are squeaking. If something is buff then it is motivative. All bewitching things are buff. All stalked things are buff. Blue things are buff. Cold, buff things are bewitching. Sergent is bewitching.", "logic": "\nMotivative(sergent)\nBewitching(nev)\nBuff(sergent) and Stalked(sergent) -> Bewitching(sergent)\nforall x (Bewitching(x) -> Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Motivative(x) -> Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Buff(x) -> Motivative(x))\nforall x (Bewitching(x) -> Buff(x))\nforall x (Stalked(x) -> Buff(x))\nforall x (Stalked(x) -> Buff(x))\nforall x (Motivative(x) and Buff(x) -> Bewitching(x))\n\nBewitching(sergent)\n\nforall x (Motivative(x) and Buff(x) -> Bewitching(x)) <- forall x (Bewitching(x) -> Buff(x)) <- Buff(sergent) and Stalked(sergent) -> Bewitching(sergent) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "Wade is reformist. Corny is aeriform. If Wade is histrionic and Wade is back then Wade is aeriform. Smart things are adjusted. All reformist things are adjusted. If something is histrionic then it is reformist. All aeriform things are histrionic. All back things are histrionic. Blue things are histrionic. Cold, histrionic things are aeriform. Corny is not back.", "logic": "\nReformist(wade)\nAeriform(corny)\nHistrionic(wade) and Back(wade) -> Aeriform(wade)\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Adjusted(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) -> Adjusted(x))\nforall x (Histrionic(x) -> Reformist(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Histrionic(x))\nforall x (Back(x) -> Histrionic(x))\nforall x (Back(x) -> Histrionic(x))\nforall x (Reformist(x) and Histrionic(x) -> Aeriform(x))\n\nnot Back(corny)\n\nnot Back(corny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "Persis is natty. Hedda is blasted. If Persis is boorish and Persis is prone then Persis is blasted. Smart things are superfine. All natty things are superfine. If something is boorish then it is natty. All blasted things are boorish. All prone things are boorish. Blue things are boorish. Cold, boorish things are blasted. Hedda is green.", "logic": "\nNatty(persis)\nBlasted(hedda)\nBoorish(persis) and Prone(persis) -> Blasted(persis)\nforall x (Blasted(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Natty(x) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Boorish(x) -> Natty(x))\nforall x (Blasted(x) -> Boorish(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Boorish(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Boorish(x))\nforall x (Natty(x) and Boorish(x) -> Blasted(x))\n\nGreen(hedda)\n\nGreen(hedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1757"} {"premises": "The charmaine harden the russ. The erastus does not eat the maire. The russ cuff the maire. The maire does not chase the charmaine. If something is infantile and it does not need the russ then the russ cuff the charmaine. If the russ cuff the maire then the russ harden the charmaine. The maire does not chase the charmaine.", "logic": "\nHarden(charmaine, russ)\nnot Anticipate(erastus, maire)\nCuff(russ, maire)\nnot Cuff(maire, charmaine)\nforall x (Infantile(x) and not Harden(x, russ) -> Cuff(russ, charmaine))\nCuff(russ, maire) -> Harden(russ, charmaine)\n\nnot Cuff(maire, charmaine)\n\ntherefore not Cuff(maire, charmaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The editha upholster the merilyn. The riki does not eat the tella. The merilyn clinch the tella. The tella does not chase the editha. If something is antemortem and it does not need the merilyn then the merilyn clinch the editha. If the merilyn clinch the tella then the merilyn upholster the editha. The riki frequent the tella.", "logic": "\nUpholster(editha, merilyn)\nnot Frequent(riki, tella)\nClinch(merilyn, tella)\nnot Clinch(tella, editha)\nforall x (Antemortem(x) and not Upholster(x, merilyn) -> Clinch(merilyn, editha))\nClinch(merilyn, tella) -> Upholster(merilyn, editha)\n\nFrequent(riki, tella)\n\ntherefore not Frequent(riki, tella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The kipp skank the nilson. The ida does not eat the brunhilde. The nilson claver the brunhilde. The brunhilde does not chase the kipp. If something is isosmotic and it does not need the nilson then the nilson claver the kipp. If the nilson claver the brunhilde then the nilson skank the kipp. The nilson skank the kipp.", "logic": "\nSkank(kipp, nilson)\nnot Chemisorb(ida, brunhilde)\nClaver(nilson, brunhilde)\nnot Claver(brunhilde, kipp)\nforall x (Isosmotic(x) and not Skank(x, nilson) -> Claver(nilson, kipp))\nClaver(nilson, brunhilde) -> Skank(nilson, kipp)\n\nSkank(nilson, kipp)\n\nClaver(nilson, brunhilde) and Claver(nilson, brunhilde) -> Skank(nilson, kipp) -> therefore Skank(nilson, kipp)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The teodorico rustle the diann. The rosella does not eat the aldrich. The diann surface the aldrich. The aldrich does not chase the teodorico. If something is peltate and it does not need the diann then the diann surface the teodorico. If the diann surface the aldrich then the diann rustle the teodorico. The diann does not need the teodorico.", "logic": "\nRustle(teodorico, diann)\nnot Inspan(rosella, aldrich)\nSurface(diann, aldrich)\nnot Surface(aldrich, teodorico)\nforall x (Peltate(x) and not Rustle(x, diann) -> Surface(diann, teodorico))\nSurface(diann, aldrich) -> Rustle(diann, teodorico)\n\nnot Rustle(diann, teodorico)\n\nSurface(diann, aldrich) and Surface(diann, aldrich) -> Rustle(diann, teodorico) -> therefore Rustle(diann, teodorico)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The peg cram the morrie. The durant does not eat the gabriela. The morrie approbate the gabriela. The gabriela does not chase the peg. If something is insular and it does not need the morrie then the morrie approbate the peg. If the morrie approbate the gabriela then the morrie cram the peg. The morrie does not chase the peg.", "logic": "\nCram(peg, morrie)\nnot Discover(durant, gabriela)\nApprobate(morrie, gabriela)\nnot Approbate(gabriela, peg)\nforall x (Insular(x) and not Cram(x, morrie) -> Approbate(morrie, peg))\nApprobate(morrie, gabriela) -> Cram(morrie, peg)\n\nnot Approbate(morrie, peg)\n\nforall x (Insular(x) and not Cram(x, morrie) -> Approbate(morrie, peg)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The joelly consort the ketty. The dulciana does not eat the pollyanna. The ketty dread the pollyanna. The pollyanna does not chase the joelly. If something is lacelike and it does not need the ketty then the ketty dread the joelly. If the ketty dread the pollyanna then the ketty consort the joelly. The ketty is cold.", "logic": "\nConsort(joelly, ketty)\nnot Beautify(dulciana, pollyanna)\nDread(ketty, pollyanna)\nnot Dread(pollyanna, joelly)\nforall x (Lacelike(x) and not Consort(x, ketty) -> Dread(ketty, joelly))\nDread(ketty, pollyanna) -> Consort(ketty, joelly)\n\nCold(ketty)\n\nCold(ketty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The dorri feint the blondy. The collins does not eat the gustave. The blondy capitalize the gustave. The gustave does not chase the dorri. If something is fledgeling and it does not need the blondy then the blondy capitalize the dorri. If the blondy capitalize the gustave then the blondy feint the dorri. The collins is not rough.", "logic": "\nFeint(dorri, blondy)\nnot Libel(collins, gustave)\nCapitalize(blondy, gustave)\nnot Capitalize(gustave, dorri)\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) and not Feint(x, blondy) -> Capitalize(blondy, dorri))\nCapitalize(blondy, gustave) -> Feint(blondy, dorri)\n\nnot Rough(collins)\n\nnot Rough(collins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The joelly scamp the clarance. The rica does not eat the thomasin. The clarance notch the thomasin. The thomasin does not chase the joelly. If something is lacerate and it does not need the clarance then the clarance notch the joelly. If the clarance notch the thomasin then the clarance scamp the joelly. The rica notch the rica.", "logic": "\nScamp(joelly, clarance)\nnot Reorganise(rica, thomasin)\nNotch(clarance, thomasin)\nnot Notch(thomasin, joelly)\nforall x (Lacerate(x) and not Scamp(x, clarance) -> Notch(clarance, joelly))\nNotch(clarance, thomasin) -> Scamp(clarance, joelly)\n\nNotch(rica, rica)\n\nNotch(rica, rica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-636"} {"premises": "The vasili is abstemious. The vasili mope the kaja. The garv inculpate the vasili. The kaja magnify the vasili. The kaja is stunned. The kaja mope the garv. The kaja inculpate the garv. If someone magnify the vasili then they are not fraught. If someone inculpate the garv and the garv does not need the kaja then the garv is androgenic. If someone is abstemious then they eat the vasili. The vasili mope the kaja.", "logic": "\nAbstemious(vasili)\nMope(vasili, kaja)\nInculpate(garv, vasili)\nMagnify(kaja, vasili)\nStunned(kaja)\nMope(kaja, garv)\nInculpate(kaja, garv)\nforall x (Magnify(x, vasili) -> not Fraught(x))\nforall x (Inculpate(x, garv) and not Mope(garv, kaja) -> Androgenic(garv))\nforall x (Abstemious(x) -> Magnify(x, vasili))\n\nMope(vasili, kaja)\n\ntherefore Mope(vasili, kaja)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The percy is speakable. The percy pauperise the tobe. The julissa sass the percy. The tobe flirt the percy. The tobe is bifacial. The tobe pauperise the julissa. The tobe sass the julissa. If someone flirt the percy then they are not flavorful. If someone sass the julissa and the julissa does not need the tobe then the julissa is pilotless. If someone is speakable then they eat the percy. The tobe does not eat the percy.", "logic": "\nSpeakable(percy)\nPauperise(percy, tobe)\nSass(julissa, percy)\nFlirt(tobe, percy)\nBifacial(tobe)\nPauperise(tobe, julissa)\nSass(tobe, julissa)\nforall x (Flirt(x, percy) -> not Flavorful(x))\nforall x (Sass(x, julissa) and not Pauperise(julissa, tobe) -> Pilotless(julissa))\nforall x (Speakable(x) -> Flirt(x, percy))\n\nnot Flirt(tobe, percy)\n\ntherefore Flirt(tobe, percy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The tisha is wilsonian. The tisha placate the suzanne. The josiah mothball the tisha. The suzanne uncurl the tisha. The suzanne is oriental. The suzanne placate the josiah. The suzanne mothball the josiah. If someone uncurl the tisha then they are not manful. If someone mothball the josiah and the josiah does not need the suzanne then the josiah is artesian. If someone is wilsonian then they eat the tisha. The suzanne is not manful.", "logic": "\nWilsonian(tisha)\nPlacate(tisha, suzanne)\nMothball(josiah, tisha)\nUncurl(suzanne, tisha)\nOriental(suzanne)\nPlacate(suzanne, josiah)\nMothball(suzanne, josiah)\nforall x (Uncurl(x, tisha) -> not Manful(x))\nforall x (Mothball(x, josiah) and not Placate(josiah, suzanne) -> Artesian(josiah))\nforall x (Wilsonian(x) -> Uncurl(x, tisha))\n\nnot Manful(suzanne)\n\nUncurl(suzanne, tisha) and forall x (Uncurl(x, tisha) -> not Manful(x)) -> therefore not Manful(suzanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The micheil is chordal. The micheil mash the deva. The odilia supple the micheil. The deva emend the micheil. The deva is deafening. The deva mash the odilia. The deva supple the odilia. If someone emend the micheil then they are not ecdemic. If someone supple the odilia and the odilia does not need the deva then the odilia is geodesical. If someone is chordal then they eat the micheil. The micheil does not eat the micheil.", "logic": "\nChordal(micheil)\nMash(micheil, deva)\nSupple(odilia, micheil)\nEmend(deva, micheil)\nDeafening(deva)\nMash(deva, odilia)\nSupple(deva, odilia)\nforall x (Emend(x, micheil) -> not Ecdemic(x))\nforall x (Supple(x, odilia) and not Mash(odilia, deva) -> Geodesical(odilia))\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> Emend(x, micheil))\n\nnot Emend(micheil, micheil)\n\nChordal(micheil) and forall x (Chordal(x) -> Emend(x, micheil)) -> therefore Emend(micheil, micheil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The ellie is unwearying. The ellie poke the hannibal. The holli venerate the ellie. The hannibal randomise the ellie. The hannibal is guyanese. The hannibal poke the holli. The hannibal venerate the holli. If someone randomise the ellie then they are not undesirous. If someone venerate the holli and the holli does not need the hannibal then the holli is striking. If someone is unwearying then they eat the ellie. The ellie is not undesirous.", "logic": "\nUnwearying(ellie)\nPoke(ellie, hannibal)\nVenerate(holli, ellie)\nRandomise(hannibal, ellie)\nGuyanese(hannibal)\nPoke(hannibal, holli)\nVenerate(hannibal, holli)\nforall x (Randomise(x, ellie) -> not Undesirous(x))\nforall x (Venerate(x, holli) and not Poke(holli, hannibal) -> Striking(holli))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) -> Randomise(x, ellie))\n\nnot Undesirous(ellie)\n\nUnwearying(ellie) and forall x (Unwearying(x) -> Randomise(x, ellie)) -> therefore Randomise(ellie, ellie) Randomise(ellie, ellie) and forall x (Randomise(x, ellie) -> not Undesirous(x)) -> therefore not Undesirous(ellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The lisbeth is crowded. The lisbeth fink the jeanelle. The valerie authorise the lisbeth. The jeanelle demonetise the lisbeth. The jeanelle is improved. The jeanelle fink the valerie. The jeanelle authorise the valerie. If someone demonetise the lisbeth then they are not undraped. If someone authorise the valerie and the valerie does not need the jeanelle then the valerie is dinky. If someone is crowded then they eat the lisbeth. The lisbeth is undraped.", "logic": "\nCrowded(lisbeth)\nFink(lisbeth, jeanelle)\nAuthorise(valerie, lisbeth)\nDemonetise(jeanelle, lisbeth)\nImproved(jeanelle)\nFink(jeanelle, valerie)\nAuthorise(jeanelle, valerie)\nforall x (Demonetise(x, lisbeth) -> not Undraped(x))\nforall x (Authorise(x, valerie) and not Fink(valerie, jeanelle) -> Dinky(valerie))\nforall x (Crowded(x) -> Demonetise(x, lisbeth))\n\nUndraped(lisbeth)\n\nCrowded(lisbeth) and forall x (Crowded(x) -> Demonetise(x, lisbeth)) -> therefore Demonetise(lisbeth, lisbeth) Demonetise(lisbeth, lisbeth) and forall x (Demonetise(x, lisbeth) -> not Undraped(x)) -> therefore not Undraped(lisbeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The lucita is expiative. The lucita debone the jeremie. The oralia sputter the lucita. The jeremie brandmark the lucita. The jeremie is rightist. The jeremie debone the oralia. The jeremie sputter the oralia. If someone brandmark the lucita then they are not untaped. If someone sputter the oralia and the oralia does not need the jeremie then the oralia is english. If someone is expiative then they eat the lucita. The oralia does not eat the lucita.", "logic": "\nExpiative(lucita)\nDebone(lucita, jeremie)\nSputter(oralia, lucita)\nBrandmark(jeremie, lucita)\nRightist(jeremie)\nDebone(jeremie, oralia)\nSputter(jeremie, oralia)\nforall x (Brandmark(x, lucita) -> not Untaped(x))\nforall x (Sputter(x, oralia) and not Debone(oralia, jeremie) -> English(oralia))\nforall x (Expiative(x) -> Brandmark(x, lucita))\n\nnot Brandmark(oralia, lucita)\n\nforall x (Expiative(x) -> Brandmark(x, lucita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The solomon is costate. The solomon colour the novelia. The maren cheek the solomon. The novelia taunt the solomon. The novelia is variolic. The novelia colour the maren. The novelia cheek the maren. If someone taunt the solomon then they are not diurnal. If someone cheek the maren and the maren does not need the novelia then the maren is bidentate. If someone is costate then they eat the solomon. The maren is bidentate.", "logic": "\nCostate(solomon)\nColour(solomon, novelia)\nCheek(maren, solomon)\nTaunt(novelia, solomon)\nVariolic(novelia)\nColour(novelia, maren)\nCheek(novelia, maren)\nforall x (Taunt(x, solomon) -> not Diurnal(x))\nforall x (Cheek(x, maren) and not Colour(maren, novelia) -> Bidentate(maren))\nforall x (Costate(x) -> Taunt(x, solomon))\n\nBidentate(maren)\n\nforall x (Cheek(x, maren) and not Colour(maren, novelia) -> Bidentate(maren)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The sharona is fitter. The sharona clangor the barnebas. The emelita reopen the sharona. The barnebas perforate the sharona. The barnebas is solomonic. The barnebas clangor the emelita. The barnebas reopen the emelita. If someone perforate the sharona then they are not dermic. If someone reopen the emelita and the emelita does not need the barnebas then the emelita is bipolar. If someone is fitter then they eat the sharona. The sharona does not visit the barnebas.", "logic": "\nFitter(sharona)\nClangor(sharona, barnebas)\nReopen(emelita, sharona)\nPerforate(barnebas, sharona)\nSolomonic(barnebas)\nClangor(barnebas, emelita)\nReopen(barnebas, emelita)\nforall x (Perforate(x, sharona) -> not Dermic(x))\nforall x (Reopen(x, emelita) and not Clangor(emelita, barnebas) -> Bipolar(emelita))\nforall x (Fitter(x) -> Perforate(x, sharona))\n\nnot Reopen(sharona, barnebas)\n\nnot Reopen(sharona, barnebas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The berny is virtuous. The berny impede the blanch. The audrye forge the berny. The blanch alternate the berny. The blanch is hurried. The blanch impede the audrye. The blanch forge the audrye. If someone alternate the berny then they are not disdainful. If someone forge the audrye and the audrye does not need the blanch then the audrye is theban. If someone is virtuous then they eat the berny. The blanch alternate the blanch.", "logic": "\nVirtuous(berny)\nImpede(berny, blanch)\nForge(audrye, berny)\nAlternate(blanch, berny)\nHurried(blanch)\nImpede(blanch, audrye)\nForge(blanch, audrye)\nforall x (Alternate(x, berny) -> not Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Forge(x, audrye) and not Impede(audrye, blanch) -> Theban(audrye))\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Alternate(x, berny))\n\nAlternate(blanch, blanch)\n\nAlternate(blanch, blanch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The ingaberg is ungrasped. The ingaberg degrade the roarke. The amanda have the ingaberg. The roarke overload the ingaberg. The roarke is practical. The roarke degrade the amanda. The roarke have the amanda. If someone overload the ingaberg then they are not azonic. If someone have the amanda and the amanda does not need the roarke then the amanda is exegetic. If someone is ungrasped then they eat the ingaberg. The roarke does not need the roarke.", "logic": "\nUngrasped(ingaberg)\nDegrade(ingaberg, roarke)\nHave(amanda, ingaberg)\nOverload(roarke, ingaberg)\nPractical(roarke)\nDegrade(roarke, amanda)\nHave(roarke, amanda)\nforall x (Overload(x, ingaberg) -> not Azonic(x))\nforall x (Have(x, amanda) and not Degrade(amanda, roarke) -> Exegetic(amanda))\nforall x (Ungrasped(x) -> Overload(x, ingaberg))\n\nnot Degrade(roarke, roarke)\n\nnot Degrade(roarke, roarke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The nelli is acceptive. The nelli violate the page. The starlin prioritize the nelli. The page classicize the nelli. The page is abstract. The page violate the starlin. The page prioritize the starlin. If someone classicize the nelli then they are not goofy. If someone prioritize the starlin and the starlin does not need the page then the starlin is cavalier. If someone is acceptive then they eat the nelli. The nelli prioritize the nelli.", "logic": "\nAcceptive(nelli)\nViolate(nelli, page)\nPrioritize(starlin, nelli)\nClassicize(page, nelli)\nAbstract(page)\nViolate(page, starlin)\nPrioritize(page, starlin)\nforall x (Classicize(x, nelli) -> not Goofy(x))\nforall x (Prioritize(x, starlin) and not Violate(starlin, page) -> Cavalier(starlin))\nforall x (Acceptive(x) -> Classicize(x, nelli))\n\nPrioritize(nelli, nelli)\n\nPrioritize(nelli, nelli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1974"} {"premises": "The warner foil the kiersten. The warner is lento. The warner is legion. The warner is inhumane. The warner is annular. The warner is scurvy. The warner redevelop the kiersten. The warner tarnish the kiersten. The kiersten does not chase the warner. The kiersten is lento. The kiersten is not legion. The kiersten is inhumane. The kiersten is annular. The kiersten is not scurvy. The kiersten redevelop the warner. The kiersten tarnish the warner. If someone redevelop the kiersten and they are not annular then the kiersten is lento. The warner tarnish the kiersten.", "logic": "\nFoil(warner, kiersten)\nLento(warner)\nLegion(warner)\nInhumane(warner)\nAnnular(warner)\nScurvy(warner)\nRedevelop(warner, kiersten)\nTarnish(warner, kiersten)\nnot Foil(kiersten, warner)\nLento(kiersten)\nnot Legion(kiersten)\nInhumane(kiersten)\nAnnular(kiersten)\nnot Scurvy(kiersten)\nRedevelop(kiersten, warner)\nTarnish(kiersten, warner)\nforall x (Redevelop(x, kiersten) and not Annular(x) -> Lento(kiersten))\n\nTarnish(warner, kiersten)\n\ntherefore Tarnish(warner, kiersten)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2096"} {"premises": "The kermit permute the marne. The kermit is defendable. The kermit is rueful. The kermit is deferent. The kermit is tractile. The kermit is cagey. The kermit pollute the marne. The kermit issue the marne. The marne does not chase the kermit. The marne is defendable. The marne is not rueful. The marne is deferent. The marne is tractile. The marne is not cagey. The marne pollute the kermit. The marne issue the kermit. If someone pollute the marne and they are not tractile then the marne is defendable. The kermit does not need the marne.", "logic": "\nPermute(kermit, marne)\nDefendable(kermit)\nRueful(kermit)\nDeferent(kermit)\nTractile(kermit)\nCagey(kermit)\nPollute(kermit, marne)\nIssue(kermit, marne)\nnot Permute(marne, kermit)\nDefendable(marne)\nnot Rueful(marne)\nDeferent(marne)\nTractile(marne)\nnot Cagey(marne)\nPollute(marne, kermit)\nIssue(marne, kermit)\nforall x (Pollute(x, marne) and not Tractile(x) -> Defendable(marne))\n\nnot Pollute(kermit, marne)\n\ntherefore Pollute(kermit, marne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2096"} {"premises": "The marcile hector the esme. The marcile is sulfurous. The marcile is unerasable. The marcile is armorial. The marcile is wormy. The marcile is autolytic. The marcile unhinge the esme. The marcile consecrate the esme. The esme does not chase the marcile. The esme is sulfurous. The esme is not unerasable. The esme is armorial. The esme is wormy. The esme is not autolytic. The esme unhinge the marcile. The esme consecrate the marcile. If someone unhinge the esme and they are not wormy then the esme is sulfurous. The esme does not chase the esme.", "logic": "\nHector(marcile, esme)\nSulfurous(marcile)\nUnerasable(marcile)\nArmorial(marcile)\nWormy(marcile)\nAutolytic(marcile)\nUnhinge(marcile, esme)\nConsecrate(marcile, esme)\nnot Hector(esme, marcile)\nSulfurous(esme)\nnot Unerasable(esme)\nArmorial(esme)\nWormy(esme)\nnot Autolytic(esme)\nUnhinge(esme, marcile)\nConsecrate(esme, marcile)\nforall x (Unhinge(x, esme) and not Wormy(x) -> Sulfurous(esme))\n\nnot Hector(esme, esme)\n\nnot Hector(esme, esme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2096"} {"premises": "The clarita wigwag the nancie. The clarita is prongy. The clarita is avellane. The clarita is axenic. The clarita is adnexal. The clarita is immemorial. The clarita hopple the nancie. The clarita thrombose the nancie. The nancie does not chase the clarita. The nancie is prongy. The nancie is not avellane. The nancie is axenic. The nancie is adnexal. The nancie is not immemorial. The nancie hopple the clarita. The nancie thrombose the clarita. If someone hopple the nancie and they are not adnexal then the nancie is prongy. The clarita thrombose the clarita.", "logic": "\nWigwag(clarita, nancie)\nProngy(clarita)\nAvellane(clarita)\nAxenic(clarita)\nAdnexal(clarita)\nImmemorial(clarita)\nHopple(clarita, nancie)\nThrombose(clarita, nancie)\nnot Wigwag(nancie, clarita)\nProngy(nancie)\nnot Avellane(nancie)\nAxenic(nancie)\nAdnexal(nancie)\nnot Immemorial(nancie)\nHopple(nancie, clarita)\nThrombose(nancie, clarita)\nforall x (Hopple(x, nancie) and not Adnexal(x) -> Prongy(nancie))\n\nThrombose(clarita, clarita)\n\nThrombose(clarita, clarita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2096"} {"premises": "Nickie is dishonored. Dimitry is unbordered. Darrel is impolitic. If Dimitry is impolitic and Dimitry is feudal then Dimitry is chinese. If something is dishonored and feudal then it is unbordered. If Dimitry is shrieked and Dimitry is feudal then Dimitry is unbordered. Smart, chinese things are shrieked. Smart things are shrieked. Blue things are feudal. Dimitry is unbordered.", "logic": "\nDishonored(nickie)\nUnbordered(dimitry)\nImpolitic(darrel)\nImpolitic(dimitry) and Feudal(dimitry) -> Chinese(dimitry)\nforall x (Dishonored(x) and Feudal(x) -> Unbordered(x))\nShrieked(dimitry) and Feudal(dimitry) -> Unbordered(dimitry)\nforall x (Unbordered(x) and Chinese(x) -> Shrieked(x))\nforall x (Unbordered(x) -> Shrieked(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Feudal(x))\n\nUnbordered(dimitry)\n\ntherefore Unbordered(dimitry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Adoree is fossorial. Vanda is tamable. Shanon is dualistic. If Vanda is dualistic and Vanda is tortious then Vanda is algonquian. If something is fossorial and tortious then it is tamable. If Vanda is romanic and Vanda is tortious then Vanda is tamable. Smart, algonquian things are romanic. Smart things are romanic. Blue things are tortious. Shanon is not dualistic.", "logic": "\nFossorial(adoree)\nTamable(vanda)\nDualistic(shanon)\nDualistic(vanda) and Tortious(vanda) -> Algonquian(vanda)\nforall x (Fossorial(x) and Tortious(x) -> Tamable(x))\nRomanic(vanda) and Tortious(vanda) -> Tamable(vanda)\nforall x (Tamable(x) and Algonquian(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Tamable(x) -> Romanic(x))\nforall x (Fossorial(x) -> Tortious(x))\n\nnot Dualistic(shanon)\n\ntherefore Dualistic(shanon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Jacki is foaming. Skippy is olive. Happy is hooklike. If Skippy is hooklike and Skippy is burred then Skippy is accoutred. If something is foaming and burred then it is olive. If Skippy is untilled and Skippy is burred then Skippy is olive. Smart, accoutred things are untilled. Smart things are untilled. Blue things are burred. Skippy is untilled.", "logic": "\nFoaming(jacki)\nOlive(skippy)\nHooklike(happy)\nHooklike(skippy) and Burred(skippy) -> Accoutred(skippy)\nforall x (Foaming(x) and Burred(x) -> Olive(x))\nUntilled(skippy) and Burred(skippy) -> Olive(skippy)\nforall x (Olive(x) and Accoutred(x) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Olive(x) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Burred(x))\n\nUntilled(skippy)\n\nOlive(skippy) and forall x (Olive(x) -> Untilled(x)) -> therefore Untilled(skippy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Olympie is purplish. Richy is terse. Maiga is nocturnal. If Richy is nocturnal and Richy is catacorner then Richy is chasidic. If something is purplish and catacorner then it is terse. If Richy is florentine and Richy is catacorner then Richy is terse. Smart, chasidic things are florentine. Smart things are florentine. Blue things are catacorner. Olympie is not catacorner.", "logic": "\nPurplish(olympie)\nTerse(richy)\nNocturnal(maiga)\nNocturnal(richy) and Catacorner(richy) -> Chasidic(richy)\nforall x (Purplish(x) and Catacorner(x) -> Terse(x))\nFlorentine(richy) and Catacorner(richy) -> Terse(richy)\nforall x (Terse(x) and Chasidic(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Terse(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Purplish(x) -> Catacorner(x))\n\nnot Catacorner(olympie)\n\nPurplish(olympie) and forall x (Purplish(x) -> Catacorner(x)) -> therefore Catacorner(olympie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Dominick is squandered. Crissie is pomaded. Gavrielle is scarlet. If Crissie is scarlet and Crissie is harmonious then Crissie is ballistic. If something is squandered and harmonious then it is pomaded. If Crissie is unpolished and Crissie is harmonious then Crissie is pomaded. Smart, ballistic things are unpolished. Smart things are unpolished. Blue things are harmonious. Dominick is pomaded.", "logic": "\nSquandered(dominick)\nPomaded(crissie)\nScarlet(gavrielle)\nScarlet(crissie) and Harmonious(crissie) -> Ballistic(crissie)\nforall x (Squandered(x) and Harmonious(x) -> Pomaded(x))\nUnpolished(crissie) and Harmonious(crissie) -> Pomaded(crissie)\nforall x (Pomaded(x) and Ballistic(x) -> Unpolished(x))\nforall x (Pomaded(x) -> Unpolished(x))\nforall x (Squandered(x) -> Harmonious(x))\n\nPomaded(dominick)\n\nSquandered(dominick) and forall x (Squandered(x) -> Harmonious(x)) -> therefore Harmonious(dominick) Squandered(dominick) and Harmonious(dominick) and forall x (Squandered(x) and Harmonious(x) -> Pomaded(x)) -> therefore Pomaded(dominick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Julee is bound. Husain is vacuous. Golda is smelling. If Husain is smelling and Husain is helpful then Husain is adjustable. If something is bound and helpful then it is vacuous. If Husain is twenty and Husain is helpful then Husain is vacuous. Smart, adjustable things are twenty. Smart things are twenty. Blue things are helpful. Julee is not vacuous.", "logic": "\nBound(julee)\nVacuous(husain)\nSmelling(golda)\nSmelling(husain) and Helpful(husain) -> Adjustable(husain)\nforall x (Bound(x) and Helpful(x) -> Vacuous(x))\nTwenty(husain) and Helpful(husain) -> Vacuous(husain)\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Adjustable(x) -> Twenty(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) -> Twenty(x))\nforall x (Bound(x) -> Helpful(x))\n\nnot Vacuous(julee)\n\nBound(julee) and forall x (Bound(x) -> Helpful(x)) -> therefore Helpful(julee) Bound(julee) and Helpful(julee) and forall x (Bound(x) and Helpful(x) -> Vacuous(x)) -> therefore Vacuous(julee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Hamid is egoistic. Milli is bust. Smitty is sedentary. If Milli is sedentary and Milli is valuable then Milli is qabalistic. If something is egoistic and valuable then it is bust. If Milli is reflexed and Milli is valuable then Milli is bust. Smart, qabalistic things are reflexed. Smart things are reflexed. Blue things are valuable. Hamid is reflexed.", "logic": "\nEgoistic(hamid)\nBust(milli)\nSedentary(smitty)\nSedentary(milli) and Valuable(milli) -> Qabalistic(milli)\nforall x (Egoistic(x) and Valuable(x) -> Bust(x))\nReflexed(milli) and Valuable(milli) -> Bust(milli)\nforall x (Bust(x) and Qabalistic(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nforall x (Bust(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Valuable(x))\n\nReflexed(hamid)\n\nEgoistic(hamid) and forall x (Egoistic(x) -> Valuable(x)) -> therefore Valuable(hamid) Egoistic(hamid) and Valuable(hamid) and forall x (Egoistic(x) and Valuable(x) -> Bust(x)) -> therefore Bust(hamid) Bust(hamid) and forall x (Bust(x) -> Reflexed(x)) -> therefore Reflexed(hamid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Aidan is mesodermal. Gayleen is secondhand. Bamby is rooted. If Gayleen is rooted and Gayleen is grungy then Gayleen is comparable. If something is mesodermal and grungy then it is secondhand. If Gayleen is identified and Gayleen is grungy then Gayleen is secondhand. Smart, comparable things are identified. Smart things are identified. Blue things are grungy. Aidan is not identified.", "logic": "\nMesodermal(aidan)\nSecondhand(gayleen)\nRooted(bamby)\nRooted(gayleen) and Grungy(gayleen) -> Comparable(gayleen)\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Grungy(x) -> Secondhand(x))\nIdentified(gayleen) and Grungy(gayleen) -> Secondhand(gayleen)\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Comparable(x) -> Identified(x))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) -> Identified(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Grungy(x))\n\nnot Identified(aidan)\n\nMesodermal(aidan) and forall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Grungy(x)) -> therefore Grungy(aidan) Mesodermal(aidan) and Grungy(aidan) and forall x (Mesodermal(x) and Grungy(x) -> Secondhand(x)) -> therefore Secondhand(aidan) Secondhand(aidan) and forall x (Secondhand(x) -> Identified(x)) -> therefore Identified(aidan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Welch is coequal. Harris is roast. Pru is writhed. If Harris is writhed and Harris is coupled then Harris is navicular. If something is coequal and coupled then it is roast. If Harris is meritless and Harris is coupled then Harris is roast. Smart, navicular things are meritless. Smart things are meritless. Blue things are coupled. Pru is not meritless.", "logic": "\nCoequal(welch)\nRoast(harris)\nWrithed(pru)\nWrithed(harris) and Coupled(harris) -> Navicular(harris)\nforall x (Coequal(x) and Coupled(x) -> Roast(x))\nMeritless(harris) and Coupled(harris) -> Roast(harris)\nforall x (Roast(x) and Navicular(x) -> Meritless(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) -> Meritless(x))\nforall x (Coequal(x) -> Coupled(x))\n\nnot Meritless(pru)\n\nforall x (Roast(x) -> Meritless(x)) <- forall x (Coequal(x) and Coupled(x) -> Roast(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Yalonda is shoed. Reuben is uncarpeted. Jennifer is popeyed. If Reuben is popeyed and Reuben is invertible then Reuben is unshaded. If something is shoed and invertible then it is uncarpeted. If Reuben is unbeknown and Reuben is invertible then Reuben is uncarpeted. Smart, unshaded things are unbeknown. Smart things are unbeknown. Blue things are invertible. Reuben is invertible.", "logic": "\nShoed(yalonda)\nUncarpeted(reuben)\nPopeyed(jennifer)\nPopeyed(reuben) and Invertible(reuben) -> Unshaded(reuben)\nforall x (Shoed(x) and Invertible(x) -> Uncarpeted(x))\nUnbeknown(reuben) and Invertible(reuben) -> Uncarpeted(reuben)\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) and Unshaded(x) -> Unbeknown(x))\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) -> Unbeknown(x))\nforall x (Shoed(x) -> Invertible(x))\n\nInvertible(reuben)\n\nforall x (Shoed(x) -> Invertible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Siffre is puppylike. Ileane is autogenous. Veronika is comforting. If Ileane is comforting and Ileane is focused then Ileane is esurient. If something is puppylike and focused then it is autogenous. If Ileane is compulsive and Ileane is focused then Ileane is autogenous. Smart, esurient things are compulsive. Smart things are compulsive. Blue things are focused. Ileane is not esurient.", "logic": "\nPuppylike(siffre)\nAutogenous(ileane)\nComforting(veronika)\nComforting(ileane) and Focused(ileane) -> Esurient(ileane)\nforall x (Puppylike(x) and Focused(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nCompulsive(ileane) and Focused(ileane) -> Autogenous(ileane)\nforall x (Autogenous(x) and Esurient(x) -> Compulsive(x))\nforall x (Autogenous(x) -> Compulsive(x))\nforall x (Puppylike(x) -> Focused(x))\n\nnot Esurient(ileane)\n\nComforting(ileane) and Focused(ileane) -> Esurient(ileane) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Marice is articulate. Alyse is nineteen. Eugine is legendary. If Alyse is legendary and Alyse is shipshape then Alyse is nonlexical. If something is articulate and shipshape then it is nineteen. If Alyse is vaporish and Alyse is shipshape then Alyse is nineteen. Smart, nonlexical things are vaporish. Smart things are vaporish. Blue things are shipshape. Eugine is nineteen.", "logic": "\nArticulate(marice)\nNineteen(alyse)\nLegendary(eugine)\nLegendary(alyse) and Shipshape(alyse) -> Nonlexical(alyse)\nforall x (Articulate(x) and Shipshape(x) -> Nineteen(x))\nVaporish(alyse) and Shipshape(alyse) -> Nineteen(alyse)\nforall x (Nineteen(x) and Nonlexical(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x) -> Shipshape(x))\n\nNineteen(eugine)\n\nforall x (Articulate(x) and Shipshape(x) -> Nineteen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Luce is impuissant. Carola is convenient. Koren is scurvy. If Carola is scurvy and Carola is harrowing then Carola is highflying. If something is impuissant and harrowing then it is convenient. If Carola is atomistic and Carola is harrowing then Carola is convenient. Smart, highflying things are atomistic. Smart things are atomistic. Blue things are harrowing. Carola is not green.", "logic": "\nImpuissant(luce)\nConvenient(carola)\nScurvy(koren)\nScurvy(carola) and Harrowing(carola) -> Highflying(carola)\nforall x (Impuissant(x) and Harrowing(x) -> Convenient(x))\nAtomistic(carola) and Harrowing(carola) -> Convenient(carola)\nforall x (Convenient(x) and Highflying(x) -> Atomistic(x))\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Atomistic(x))\nforall x (Impuissant(x) -> Harrowing(x))\n\nnot Green(carola)\n\nnot Green(carola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Mercedes is inviolate. Dasie is stillborn. Rora is pestered. If Dasie is pestered and Dasie is pushful then Dasie is xvii. If something is inviolate and pushful then it is stillborn. If Dasie is viewable and Dasie is pushful then Dasie is stillborn. Smart, xvii things are viewable. Smart things are viewable. Blue things are pushful. Rora is green.", "logic": "\nInviolate(mercedes)\nStillborn(dasie)\nPestered(rora)\nPestered(dasie) and Pushful(dasie) -> Xvii(dasie)\nforall x (Inviolate(x) and Pushful(x) -> Stillborn(x))\nViewable(dasie) and Pushful(dasie) -> Stillborn(dasie)\nforall x (Stillborn(x) and Xvii(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) -> Pushful(x))\n\nGreen(rora)\n\nGreen(rora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Merna is mystifying. Taylor is hunted. Shir is stuffed. If Taylor is stuffed and Taylor is open then Taylor is mantic. If something is mystifying and open then it is hunted. If Taylor is cytologic and Taylor is open then Taylor is hunted. Smart, mantic things are cytologic. Smart things are cytologic. Blue things are open. Taylor is not stuffed.", "logic": "\nMystifying(merna)\nHunted(taylor)\nStuffed(shir)\nStuffed(taylor) and Open(taylor) -> Mantic(taylor)\nforall x (Mystifying(x) and Open(x) -> Hunted(x))\nCytologic(taylor) and Open(taylor) -> Hunted(taylor)\nforall x (Hunted(x) and Mantic(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Hunted(x) -> Cytologic(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) -> Open(x))\n\nnot Stuffed(taylor)\n\nnot Stuffed(taylor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Erminie is muffled. Torrie is climactic. Francesca is markovian. If Torrie is markovian and Torrie is ready then Torrie is foggy. If something is muffled and ready then it is climactic. If Torrie is unended and Torrie is ready then Torrie is climactic. Smart, foggy things are unended. Smart things are unended. Blue things are ready. Erminie is green.", "logic": "\nMuffled(erminie)\nClimactic(torrie)\nMarkovian(francesca)\nMarkovian(torrie) and Ready(torrie) -> Foggy(torrie)\nforall x (Muffled(x) and Ready(x) -> Climactic(x))\nUnended(torrie) and Ready(torrie) -> Climactic(torrie)\nforall x (Climactic(x) and Foggy(x) -> Unended(x))\nforall x (Climactic(x) -> Unended(x))\nforall x (Muffled(x) -> Ready(x))\n\nGreen(erminie)\n\nGreen(erminie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-446"} {"premises": "Kylie is upmarket. Cloris is fearless. Doralia is open. Clarice is upmarket. If Cloris is open then Cloris is unforceful. Doralia is open.", "logic": "\nUpmarket(kylie)\nFearless(cloris)\nOpen(doralia)\nUpmarket(clarice)\nOpen(cloris) -> Unforceful(cloris)\n\nOpen(doralia)\n\ntherefore Open(doralia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-207"} {"premises": "Abner is malefic. Harald is fantastic. Talbert is auric. Ariel is malefic. If Harald is auric then Harald is xxxii. Harald is not fantastic.", "logic": "\nMalefic(abner)\nFantastic(harald)\nAuric(talbert)\nMalefic(ariel)\nAuric(harald) -> Xxxii(harald)\n\nnot Fantastic(harald)\n\ntherefore Fantastic(harald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-207"} {"premises": "Torr is checked. Baily is implicated. Quent is lowland. Hortensia is checked. If Baily is lowland then Baily is astatic. Baily is not astatic.", "logic": "\nChecked(torr)\nImplicated(baily)\nLowland(quent)\nChecked(hortensia)\nLowland(baily) -> Astatic(baily)\n\nnot Astatic(baily)\n\nLowland(baily) -> Astatic(baily) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-207"} {"premises": "Micheal is fattened. Spiro is used. Moselle is downtown. Emanuela is fattened. If Spiro is downtown then Spiro is distinct. Spiro is fattened.", "logic": "\nFattened(micheal)\nUsed(spiro)\nDowntown(moselle)\nFattened(emanuela)\nDowntown(spiro) -> Distinct(spiro)\n\nFattened(spiro)\n\nFattened(spiro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-207"} {"premises": "The silvia blueprint the kesley. The silvia is modified. The silvia is courtly. The silvia mongrelize the kesley. The silvia slash the kesley. The kesley blueprint the silvia. The kesley is mangled. The kesley is courtly. The kesley is knobbed. The kesley is microbic. The kesley mongrelize the silvia. The kesley slash the silvia. If someone is mangled then they are knobbed. If someone slash the kesley then the kesley slash the silvia. The kesley slash the silvia.", "logic": "\nBlueprint(silvia, kesley)\nModified(silvia)\nCourtly(silvia)\nMongrelize(silvia, kesley)\nSlash(silvia, kesley)\nBlueprint(kesley, silvia)\nMangled(kesley)\nCourtly(kesley)\nKnobbed(kesley)\nMicrobic(kesley)\nMongrelize(kesley, silvia)\nSlash(kesley, silvia)\nforall x (Mangled(x) -> Knobbed(x))\nforall x (Slash(x, kesley) -> Slash(kesley, silvia))\n\nSlash(kesley, silvia)\n\ntherefore Slash(kesley, silvia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3676"} {"premises": "The shaun imagine the clemence. The shaun is birch. The shaun is mosaic. The shaun deplete the clemence. The shaun abominate the clemence. The clemence imagine the shaun. The clemence is stung. The clemence is mosaic. The clemence is monthlong. The clemence is rotund. The clemence deplete the shaun. The clemence abominate the shaun. If someone is stung then they are monthlong. If someone abominate the clemence then the clemence abominate the shaun. The clemence is not stung.", "logic": "\nImagine(shaun, clemence)\nBirch(shaun)\nMosaic(shaun)\nDeplete(shaun, clemence)\nAbominate(shaun, clemence)\nImagine(clemence, shaun)\nStung(clemence)\nMosaic(clemence)\nMonthlong(clemence)\nRotund(clemence)\nDeplete(clemence, shaun)\nAbominate(clemence, shaun)\nforall x (Stung(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Abominate(x, clemence) -> Abominate(clemence, shaun))\n\nnot Stung(clemence)\n\ntherefore Stung(clemence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3676"} {"premises": "The denis imbibe the abbot. The denis is unaddicted. The denis is processed. The denis unbox the abbot. The denis withhold the abbot. The abbot imbibe the denis. The abbot is mucose. The abbot is processed. The abbot is mephitic. The abbot is exiguous. The abbot unbox the denis. The abbot withhold the denis. If someone is mucose then they are mephitic. If someone withhold the abbot then the abbot withhold the denis. The denis is not mephitic.", "logic": "\nImbibe(denis, abbot)\nUnaddicted(denis)\nProcessed(denis)\nUnbox(denis, abbot)\nWithhold(denis, abbot)\nImbibe(abbot, denis)\nMucose(abbot)\nProcessed(abbot)\nMephitic(abbot)\nExiguous(abbot)\nUnbox(abbot, denis)\nWithhold(abbot, denis)\nforall x (Mucose(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Withhold(x, abbot) -> Withhold(abbot, denis))\n\nnot Mephitic(denis)\n\nforall x (Mucose(x) -> Mephitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3676"} {"premises": "The mignon ream the maryrose. The mignon is unheated. The mignon is coronary. The mignon thrum the maryrose. The mignon concretise the maryrose. The maryrose ream the mignon. The maryrose is italic. The maryrose is coronary. The maryrose is guatemalan. The maryrose is sodden. The maryrose thrum the mignon. The maryrose concretise the mignon. If someone is italic then they are guatemalan. If someone concretise the maryrose then the maryrose concretise the mignon. The maryrose is unheated.", "logic": "\nReam(mignon, maryrose)\nUnheated(mignon)\nCoronary(mignon)\nThrum(mignon, maryrose)\nConcretise(mignon, maryrose)\nReam(maryrose, mignon)\nItalic(maryrose)\nCoronary(maryrose)\nGuatemalan(maryrose)\nSodden(maryrose)\nThrum(maryrose, mignon)\nConcretise(maryrose, mignon)\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Guatemalan(x))\nforall x (Concretise(x, maryrose) -> Concretise(maryrose, mignon))\n\nUnheated(maryrose)\n\nUnheated(maryrose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3676"} {"premises": "The augustin is casual. The augustin does not need the lani. The augustin flub the lani. The lani mull the augustin. The lani is lowbred. The lani patrol the augustin. The lani flub the augustin. If something flub the lani and the lani mull the augustin then the augustin is lowbred. If something patrol the augustin and the augustin patrol the lani then it does not eat the augustin. If something is lowbred then it mull the augustin. If the lani mull the augustin and the lani patrol the augustin then the augustin mull the lani. If something patrol the lani then the lani does not see the augustin. If something mull the augustin then it flub the augustin. The lani is lowbred.", "logic": "\nCasual(augustin)\nnot Patrol(augustin, lani)\nFlub(augustin, lani)\nMull(lani, augustin)\nLowbred(lani)\nPatrol(lani, augustin)\nFlub(lani, augustin)\nforall x (Flub(x, lani) and Mull(lani, augustin) -> Lowbred(augustin))\nforall x (Patrol(x, augustin) and Patrol(augustin, lani) -> not Mull(x, augustin))\nforall x (Lowbred(x) -> Mull(x, augustin))\nMull(lani, augustin) and Patrol(lani, augustin) -> Mull(augustin, lani)\nforall x (Patrol(x, lani) -> not Flub(lani, augustin))\nforall x (Mull(x, augustin) -> Flub(x, augustin))\n\nLowbred(lani)\n\ntherefore Lowbred(lani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The gennifer is manifest. The gennifer does not need the kriste. The gennifer autograph the kriste. The kriste leather the gennifer. The kriste is deterrent. The kriste impale the gennifer. The kriste autograph the gennifer. If something autograph the kriste and the kriste leather the gennifer then the gennifer is deterrent. If something impale the gennifer and the gennifer impale the kriste then it does not eat the gennifer. If something is deterrent then it leather the gennifer. If the kriste leather the gennifer and the kriste impale the gennifer then the gennifer leather the kriste. If something impale the kriste then the kriste does not see the gennifer. If something leather the gennifer then it autograph the gennifer. The kriste is not deterrent.", "logic": "\nManifest(gennifer)\nnot Impale(gennifer, kriste)\nAutograph(gennifer, kriste)\nLeather(kriste, gennifer)\nDeterrent(kriste)\nImpale(kriste, gennifer)\nAutograph(kriste, gennifer)\nforall x (Autograph(x, kriste) and Leather(kriste, gennifer) -> Deterrent(gennifer))\nforall x (Impale(x, gennifer) and Impale(gennifer, kriste) -> not Leather(x, gennifer))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) -> Leather(x, gennifer))\nLeather(kriste, gennifer) and Impale(kriste, gennifer) -> Leather(gennifer, kriste)\nforall x (Impale(x, kriste) -> not Autograph(kriste, gennifer))\nforall x (Leather(x, gennifer) -> Autograph(x, gennifer))\n\nnot Deterrent(kriste)\n\ntherefore Deterrent(kriste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The glennie is lubricated. The glennie does not need the gerrilee. The glennie nail the gerrilee. The gerrilee contort the glennie. The gerrilee is restless. The gerrilee rumple the glennie. The gerrilee nail the glennie. If something nail the gerrilee and the gerrilee contort the glennie then the glennie is restless. If something rumple the glennie and the glennie rumple the gerrilee then it does not eat the glennie. If something is restless then it contort the glennie. If the gerrilee contort the glennie and the gerrilee rumple the glennie then the glennie contort the gerrilee. If something rumple the gerrilee then the gerrilee does not see the glennie. If something contort the glennie then it nail the glennie. The glennie contort the gerrilee.", "logic": "\nLubricated(glennie)\nnot Rumple(glennie, gerrilee)\nNail(glennie, gerrilee)\nContort(gerrilee, glennie)\nRestless(gerrilee)\nRumple(gerrilee, glennie)\nNail(gerrilee, glennie)\nforall x (Nail(x, gerrilee) and Contort(gerrilee, glennie) -> Restless(glennie))\nforall x (Rumple(x, glennie) and Rumple(glennie, gerrilee) -> not Contort(x, glennie))\nforall x (Restless(x) -> Contort(x, glennie))\nContort(gerrilee, glennie) and Rumple(gerrilee, glennie) -> Contort(glennie, gerrilee)\nforall x (Rumple(x, gerrilee) -> not Nail(gerrilee, glennie))\nforall x (Contort(x, glennie) -> Nail(x, glennie))\n\nContort(glennie, gerrilee)\n\nContort(gerrilee, glennie) and Rumple(gerrilee, glennie) and Contort(gerrilee, glennie) and Rumple(gerrilee, glennie) -> Contort(glennie, gerrilee) -> therefore Contort(glennie, gerrilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The bentley is coherent. The bentley does not need the dmitri. The bentley encamp the dmitri. The dmitri await the bentley. The dmitri is correlated. The dmitri annihilate the bentley. The dmitri encamp the bentley. If something encamp the dmitri and the dmitri await the bentley then the bentley is correlated. If something annihilate the bentley and the bentley annihilate the dmitri then it does not eat the bentley. If something is correlated then it await the bentley. If the dmitri await the bentley and the dmitri annihilate the bentley then the bentley await the dmitri. If something annihilate the dmitri then the dmitri does not see the bentley. If something await the bentley then it encamp the bentley. The bentley is not correlated.", "logic": "\nCoherent(bentley)\nnot Annihilate(bentley, dmitri)\nEncamp(bentley, dmitri)\nAwait(dmitri, bentley)\nCorrelated(dmitri)\nAnnihilate(dmitri, bentley)\nEncamp(dmitri, bentley)\nforall x (Encamp(x, dmitri) and Await(dmitri, bentley) -> Correlated(bentley))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, bentley) and Annihilate(bentley, dmitri) -> not Await(x, bentley))\nforall x (Correlated(x) -> Await(x, bentley))\nAwait(dmitri, bentley) and Annihilate(dmitri, bentley) -> Await(bentley, dmitri)\nforall x (Annihilate(x, dmitri) -> not Encamp(dmitri, bentley))\nforall x (Await(x, bentley) -> Encamp(x, bentley))\n\nnot Correlated(bentley)\n\nEncamp(bentley, dmitri) and Await(dmitri, bentley) and forall x (Encamp(x, dmitri) and Await(dmitri, bentley) -> Correlated(bentley)) -> therefore Correlated(bentley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The allsun is bass. The allsun does not need the eba. The allsun resole the eba. The eba reappraise the allsun. The eba is banner. The eba remodel the allsun. The eba resole the allsun. If something resole the eba and the eba reappraise the allsun then the allsun is banner. If something remodel the allsun and the allsun remodel the eba then it does not eat the allsun. If something is banner then it reappraise the allsun. If the eba reappraise the allsun and the eba remodel the allsun then the allsun reappraise the eba. If something remodel the eba then the eba does not see the allsun. If something reappraise the allsun then it resole the allsun. The allsun reappraise the allsun.", "logic": "\nBass(allsun)\nnot Remodel(allsun, eba)\nResole(allsun, eba)\nReappraise(eba, allsun)\nBanner(eba)\nRemodel(eba, allsun)\nResole(eba, allsun)\nforall x (Resole(x, eba) and Reappraise(eba, allsun) -> Banner(allsun))\nforall x (Remodel(x, allsun) and Remodel(allsun, eba) -> not Reappraise(x, allsun))\nforall x (Banner(x) -> Reappraise(x, allsun))\nReappraise(eba, allsun) and Remodel(eba, allsun) -> Reappraise(allsun, eba)\nforall x (Remodel(x, eba) -> not Resole(eba, allsun))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, allsun) -> Resole(x, allsun))\n\nReappraise(allsun, allsun)\n\nResole(allsun, eba) and Reappraise(eba, allsun) and forall x (Resole(x, eba) and Reappraise(eba, allsun) -> Banner(allsun)) -> therefore Banner(allsun) Banner(allsun) and forall x (Banner(x) -> Reappraise(x, allsun)) -> therefore Reappraise(allsun, allsun)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The freda is dexterous. The freda does not need the kynthia. The freda insure the kynthia. The kynthia barrage the freda. The kynthia is donnish. The kynthia revet the freda. The kynthia insure the freda. If something insure the kynthia and the kynthia barrage the freda then the freda is donnish. If something revet the freda and the freda revet the kynthia then it does not eat the freda. If something is donnish then it barrage the freda. If the kynthia barrage the freda and the kynthia revet the freda then the freda barrage the kynthia. If something revet the kynthia then the kynthia does not see the freda. If something barrage the freda then it insure the freda. The freda does not eat the freda.", "logic": "\nDexterous(freda)\nnot Revet(freda, kynthia)\nInsure(freda, kynthia)\nBarrage(kynthia, freda)\nDonnish(kynthia)\nRevet(kynthia, freda)\nInsure(kynthia, freda)\nforall x (Insure(x, kynthia) and Barrage(kynthia, freda) -> Donnish(freda))\nforall x (Revet(x, freda) and Revet(freda, kynthia) -> not Barrage(x, freda))\nforall x (Donnish(x) -> Barrage(x, freda))\nBarrage(kynthia, freda) and Revet(kynthia, freda) -> Barrage(freda, kynthia)\nforall x (Revet(x, kynthia) -> not Insure(kynthia, freda))\nforall x (Barrage(x, freda) -> Insure(x, freda))\n\nnot Barrage(freda, freda)\n\nInsure(freda, kynthia) and Barrage(kynthia, freda) and forall x (Insure(x, kynthia) and Barrage(kynthia, freda) -> Donnish(freda)) -> therefore Donnish(freda) Donnish(freda) and forall x (Donnish(x) -> Barrage(x, freda)) -> therefore Barrage(freda, freda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The nico is must. The nico does not need the blondell. The nico save the blondell. The blondell deplumate the nico. The blondell is winy. The blondell bung the nico. The blondell save the nico. If something save the blondell and the blondell deplumate the nico then the nico is winy. If something bung the nico and the nico bung the blondell then it does not eat the nico. If something is winy then it deplumate the nico. If the blondell deplumate the nico and the blondell bung the nico then the nico deplumate the blondell. If something bung the blondell then the blondell does not see the nico. If something deplumate the nico then it save the nico. The nico save the nico.", "logic": "\nMust(nico)\nnot Bung(nico, blondell)\nSave(nico, blondell)\nDeplumate(blondell, nico)\nWiny(blondell)\nBung(blondell, nico)\nSave(blondell, nico)\nforall x (Save(x, blondell) and Deplumate(blondell, nico) -> Winy(nico))\nforall x (Bung(x, nico) and Bung(nico, blondell) -> not Deplumate(x, nico))\nforall x (Winy(x) -> Deplumate(x, nico))\nDeplumate(blondell, nico) and Bung(blondell, nico) -> Deplumate(nico, blondell)\nforall x (Bung(x, blondell) -> not Save(blondell, nico))\nforall x (Deplumate(x, nico) -> Save(x, nico))\n\nSave(nico, nico)\n\nSave(nico, blondell) and Deplumate(blondell, nico) and forall x (Save(x, blondell) and Deplumate(blondell, nico) -> Winy(nico)) -> therefore Winy(nico) Winy(nico) and forall x (Winy(x) -> Deplumate(x, nico)) -> therefore Deplumate(nico, nico) Deplumate(nico, nico) and forall x (Deplumate(x, nico) -> Save(x, nico)) -> therefore Save(nico, nico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The melitta is summative. The melitta does not need the caroline. The melitta becharm the caroline. The caroline reopen the melitta. The caroline is eudemonic. The caroline miter the melitta. The caroline becharm the melitta. If something becharm the caroline and the caroline reopen the melitta then the melitta is eudemonic. If something miter the melitta and the melitta miter the caroline then it does not eat the melitta. If something is eudemonic then it reopen the melitta. If the caroline reopen the melitta and the caroline miter the melitta then the melitta reopen the caroline. If something miter the caroline then the caroline does not see the melitta. If something reopen the melitta then it becharm the melitta. The melitta does not see the melitta.", "logic": "\nSummative(melitta)\nnot Miter(melitta, caroline)\nBecharm(melitta, caroline)\nReopen(caroline, melitta)\nEudemonic(caroline)\nMiter(caroline, melitta)\nBecharm(caroline, melitta)\nforall x (Becharm(x, caroline) and Reopen(caroline, melitta) -> Eudemonic(melitta))\nforall x (Miter(x, melitta) and Miter(melitta, caroline) -> not Reopen(x, melitta))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) -> Reopen(x, melitta))\nReopen(caroline, melitta) and Miter(caroline, melitta) -> Reopen(melitta, caroline)\nforall x (Miter(x, caroline) -> not Becharm(caroline, melitta))\nforall x (Reopen(x, melitta) -> Becharm(x, melitta))\n\nnot Becharm(melitta, melitta)\n\nBecharm(melitta, caroline) and Reopen(caroline, melitta) and forall x (Becharm(x, caroline) and Reopen(caroline, melitta) -> Eudemonic(melitta)) -> therefore Eudemonic(melitta) Eudemonic(melitta) and forall x (Eudemonic(x) -> Reopen(x, melitta)) -> therefore Reopen(melitta, melitta) Reopen(melitta, melitta) and forall x (Reopen(x, melitta) -> Becharm(x, melitta)) -> therefore Becharm(melitta, melitta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The merry is epithelial. The merry does not need the gustaf. The merry damn the gustaf. The gustaf snog the merry. The gustaf is factious. The gustaf extradite the merry. The gustaf damn the merry. If something damn the gustaf and the gustaf snog the merry then the merry is factious. If something extradite the merry and the merry extradite the gustaf then it does not eat the merry. If something is factious then it snog the merry. If the gustaf snog the merry and the gustaf extradite the merry then the merry snog the gustaf. If something extradite the gustaf then the gustaf does not see the merry. If something snog the merry then it damn the merry. The gustaf does not see the gustaf.", "logic": "\nEpithelial(merry)\nnot Extradite(merry, gustaf)\nDamn(merry, gustaf)\nSnog(gustaf, merry)\nFactious(gustaf)\nExtradite(gustaf, merry)\nDamn(gustaf, merry)\nforall x (Damn(x, gustaf) and Snog(gustaf, merry) -> Factious(merry))\nforall x (Extradite(x, merry) and Extradite(merry, gustaf) -> not Snog(x, merry))\nforall x (Factious(x) -> Snog(x, merry))\nSnog(gustaf, merry) and Extradite(gustaf, merry) -> Snog(merry, gustaf)\nforall x (Extradite(x, gustaf) -> not Damn(gustaf, merry))\nforall x (Snog(x, merry) -> Damn(x, merry))\n\nnot Damn(gustaf, gustaf)\n\nnot Damn(gustaf, gustaf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The edouard is dropsical. The edouard does not need the ilyse. The edouard rabbet the ilyse. The ilyse demur the edouard. The ilyse is yelled. The ilyse bide the edouard. The ilyse rabbet the edouard. If something rabbet the ilyse and the ilyse demur the edouard then the edouard is yelled. If something bide the edouard and the edouard bide the ilyse then it does not eat the edouard. If something is yelled then it demur the edouard. If the ilyse demur the edouard and the ilyse bide the edouard then the edouard demur the ilyse. If something bide the ilyse then the ilyse does not see the edouard. If something demur the edouard then it rabbet the edouard. The ilyse demur the ilyse.", "logic": "\nDropsical(edouard)\nnot Bide(edouard, ilyse)\nRabbet(edouard, ilyse)\nDemur(ilyse, edouard)\nYelled(ilyse)\nBide(ilyse, edouard)\nRabbet(ilyse, edouard)\nforall x (Rabbet(x, ilyse) and Demur(ilyse, edouard) -> Yelled(edouard))\nforall x (Bide(x, edouard) and Bide(edouard, ilyse) -> not Demur(x, edouard))\nforall x (Yelled(x) -> Demur(x, edouard))\nDemur(ilyse, edouard) and Bide(ilyse, edouard) -> Demur(edouard, ilyse)\nforall x (Bide(x, ilyse) -> not Rabbet(ilyse, edouard))\nforall x (Demur(x, edouard) -> Rabbet(x, edouard))\n\nDemur(ilyse, ilyse)\n\nDemur(ilyse, ilyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The nollie is random. The nollie does not need the nariko. The nollie hypnotize the nariko. The nariko nudge the nollie. The nariko is shrill. The nariko discomfit the nollie. The nariko hypnotize the nollie. If something hypnotize the nariko and the nariko nudge the nollie then the nollie is shrill. If something discomfit the nollie and the nollie discomfit the nariko then it does not eat the nollie. If something is shrill then it nudge the nollie. If the nariko nudge the nollie and the nariko discomfit the nollie then the nollie nudge the nariko. If something discomfit the nariko then the nariko does not see the nollie. If something nudge the nollie then it hypnotize the nollie. The nariko does not need the nariko.", "logic": "\nRandom(nollie)\nnot Discomfit(nollie, nariko)\nHypnotize(nollie, nariko)\nNudge(nariko, nollie)\nShrill(nariko)\nDiscomfit(nariko, nollie)\nHypnotize(nariko, nollie)\nforall x (Hypnotize(x, nariko) and Nudge(nariko, nollie) -> Shrill(nollie))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, nollie) and Discomfit(nollie, nariko) -> not Nudge(x, nollie))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Nudge(x, nollie))\nNudge(nariko, nollie) and Discomfit(nariko, nollie) -> Nudge(nollie, nariko)\nforall x (Discomfit(x, nariko) -> not Hypnotize(nariko, nollie))\nforall x (Nudge(x, nollie) -> Hypnotize(x, nollie))\n\nnot Discomfit(nariko, nariko)\n\nnot Discomfit(nariko, nariko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The diannne is roaring. The diannne does not need the ollie. The diannne dice the ollie. The ollie resist the diannne. The ollie is inclined. The ollie sole the diannne. The ollie dice the diannne. If something dice the ollie and the ollie resist the diannne then the diannne is inclined. If something sole the diannne and the diannne sole the ollie then it does not eat the diannne. If something is inclined then it resist the diannne. If the ollie resist the diannne and the ollie sole the diannne then the diannne resist the ollie. If something sole the ollie then the ollie does not see the diannne. If something resist the diannne then it dice the diannne. The ollie is roaring.", "logic": "\nRoaring(diannne)\nnot Sole(diannne, ollie)\nDice(diannne, ollie)\nResist(ollie, diannne)\nInclined(ollie)\nSole(ollie, diannne)\nDice(ollie, diannne)\nforall x (Dice(x, ollie) and Resist(ollie, diannne) -> Inclined(diannne))\nforall x (Sole(x, diannne) and Sole(diannne, ollie) -> not Resist(x, diannne))\nforall x (Inclined(x) -> Resist(x, diannne))\nResist(ollie, diannne) and Sole(ollie, diannne) -> Resist(diannne, ollie)\nforall x (Sole(x, ollie) -> not Dice(ollie, diannne))\nforall x (Resist(x, diannne) -> Dice(x, diannne))\n\nRoaring(ollie)\n\nRoaring(ollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The ashlie is purebred. The ashlie does not need the vasili. The ashlie gibe the vasili. The vasili animate the ashlie. The vasili is egotistic. The vasili prune the ashlie. The vasili gibe the ashlie. If something gibe the vasili and the vasili animate the ashlie then the ashlie is egotistic. If something prune the ashlie and the ashlie prune the vasili then it does not eat the ashlie. If something is egotistic then it animate the ashlie. If the vasili animate the ashlie and the vasili prune the ashlie then the ashlie animate the vasili. If something prune the vasili then the vasili does not see the ashlie. If something animate the ashlie then it gibe the ashlie. The vasili is not rough.", "logic": "\nPurebred(ashlie)\nnot Prune(ashlie, vasili)\nGibe(ashlie, vasili)\nAnimate(vasili, ashlie)\nEgotistic(vasili)\nPrune(vasili, ashlie)\nGibe(vasili, ashlie)\nforall x (Gibe(x, vasili) and Animate(vasili, ashlie) -> Egotistic(ashlie))\nforall x (Prune(x, ashlie) and Prune(ashlie, vasili) -> not Animate(x, ashlie))\nforall x (Egotistic(x) -> Animate(x, ashlie))\nAnimate(vasili, ashlie) and Prune(vasili, ashlie) -> Animate(ashlie, vasili)\nforall x (Prune(x, vasili) -> not Gibe(vasili, ashlie))\nforall x (Animate(x, ashlie) -> Gibe(x, ashlie))\n\nnot Rough(vasili)\n\nnot Rough(vasili) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The queenie is antisocial. The queenie does not need the abdel. The queenie shirr the abdel. The abdel cozen the queenie. The abdel is priceless. The abdel litigate the queenie. The abdel shirr the queenie. If something shirr the abdel and the abdel cozen the queenie then the queenie is priceless. If something litigate the queenie and the queenie litigate the abdel then it does not eat the queenie. If something is priceless then it cozen the queenie. If the abdel cozen the queenie and the abdel litigate the queenie then the queenie cozen the abdel. If something litigate the abdel then the abdel does not see the queenie. If something cozen the queenie then it shirr the queenie. The queenie is green.", "logic": "\nAntisocial(queenie)\nnot Litigate(queenie, abdel)\nShirr(queenie, abdel)\nCozen(abdel, queenie)\nPriceless(abdel)\nLitigate(abdel, queenie)\nShirr(abdel, queenie)\nforall x (Shirr(x, abdel) and Cozen(abdel, queenie) -> Priceless(queenie))\nforall x (Litigate(x, queenie) and Litigate(queenie, abdel) -> not Cozen(x, queenie))\nforall x (Priceless(x) -> Cozen(x, queenie))\nCozen(abdel, queenie) and Litigate(abdel, queenie) -> Cozen(queenie, abdel)\nforall x (Litigate(x, abdel) -> not Shirr(abdel, queenie))\nforall x (Cozen(x, queenie) -> Shirr(x, queenie))\n\nGreen(queenie)\n\nGreen(queenie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The edyth is hearable. The edyth does not need the lotti. The edyth surtax the lotti. The lotti humanise the edyth. The lotti is lopsided. The lotti wigwag the edyth. The lotti surtax the edyth. If something surtax the lotti and the lotti humanise the edyth then the edyth is lopsided. If something wigwag the edyth and the edyth wigwag the lotti then it does not eat the edyth. If something is lopsided then it humanise the edyth. If the lotti humanise the edyth and the lotti wigwag the edyth then the edyth humanise the lotti. If something wigwag the lotti then the lotti does not see the edyth. If something humanise the edyth then it surtax the edyth. The lotti is not kind.", "logic": "\nHearable(edyth)\nnot Wigwag(edyth, lotti)\nSurtax(edyth, lotti)\nHumanise(lotti, edyth)\nLopsided(lotti)\nWigwag(lotti, edyth)\nSurtax(lotti, edyth)\nforall x (Surtax(x, lotti) and Humanise(lotti, edyth) -> Lopsided(edyth))\nforall x (Wigwag(x, edyth) and Wigwag(edyth, lotti) -> not Humanise(x, edyth))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Humanise(x, edyth))\nHumanise(lotti, edyth) and Wigwag(lotti, edyth) -> Humanise(edyth, lotti)\nforall x (Wigwag(x, lotti) -> not Surtax(lotti, edyth))\nforall x (Humanise(x, edyth) -> Surtax(x, edyth))\n\nnot Kind(lotti)\n\nnot Kind(lotti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "The aldwin is decumbent. The aldwin does not need the gretel. The aldwin white the gretel. The gretel purloin the aldwin. The gretel is validated. The gretel sort the aldwin. The gretel white the aldwin. If something white the gretel and the gretel purloin the aldwin then the aldwin is validated. If something sort the aldwin and the aldwin sort the gretel then it does not eat the aldwin. If something is validated then it purloin the aldwin. If the gretel purloin the aldwin and the gretel sort the aldwin then the aldwin purloin the gretel. If something sort the gretel then the gretel does not see the aldwin. If something purloin the aldwin then it white the aldwin. The aldwin sort the aldwin.", "logic": "\nDecumbent(aldwin)\nnot Sort(aldwin, gretel)\nWhite(aldwin, gretel)\nPurloin(gretel, aldwin)\nValidated(gretel)\nSort(gretel, aldwin)\nWhite(gretel, aldwin)\nforall x (White(x, gretel) and Purloin(gretel, aldwin) -> Validated(aldwin))\nforall x (Sort(x, aldwin) and Sort(aldwin, gretel) -> not Purloin(x, aldwin))\nforall x (Validated(x) -> Purloin(x, aldwin))\nPurloin(gretel, aldwin) and Sort(gretel, aldwin) -> Purloin(aldwin, gretel)\nforall x (Sort(x, gretel) -> not White(gretel, aldwin))\nforall x (Purloin(x, aldwin) -> White(x, aldwin))\n\nSort(aldwin, aldwin)\n\nSort(aldwin, aldwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-682"} {"premises": "Marta is immortal. Nicolina is pleochroic. If someone is peccable and not immortal then they are benignant. Marta is immortal.", "logic": "\nImmortal(marta)\nPleochroic(nicolina)\nforall x (Peccable(x) and not Immortal(x) -> Benignant(x))\n\nImmortal(marta)\n\ntherefore Immortal(marta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5208"} {"premises": "Buster is stative. Virgie is carinate. If someone is celibate and not stative then they are assentient. Virgie is not carinate.", "logic": "\nStative(buster)\nCarinate(virgie)\nforall x (Celibate(x) and not Stative(x) -> Assentient(x))\n\nnot Carinate(virgie)\n\ntherefore Carinate(virgie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5208"} {"premises": "Viki is mesic. Town is chipper. If someone is reddish and not mesic then they are unfledged. Town is not unfledged.", "logic": "\nMesic(viki)\nChipper(town)\nforall x (Reddish(x) and not Mesic(x) -> Unfledged(x))\n\nnot Unfledged(town)\n\nforall x (Reddish(x) and not Mesic(x) -> Unfledged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5208"} {"premises": "Hazel is hammered. Wendeline is strait. If someone is transpolar and not hammered then they are untrodden. Hazel is green.", "logic": "\nHammered(hazel)\nStrait(wendeline)\nforall x (Transpolar(x) and not Hammered(x) -> Untrodden(x))\n\nGreen(hazel)\n\nGreen(hazel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5208"} {"premises": "The gunilla boldface the nerti. The nerti is genic. If something boldface the nerti then the nerti demob the gunilla. If something demob the gunilla then it boldface the gunilla. If something demob the gunilla then the gunilla is drenched. If something cheese the gunilla and the gunilla is not permeative then it demob the nerti. If something is hotheaded then it does not eat the nerti. If the gunilla cheese the nerti and the nerti demob the gunilla then the gunilla demob the nerti. If the gunilla is drenched then the gunilla demob the nerti. If something demob the nerti and it does not eat the gunilla then it does not need the nerti. The nerti is genic.", "logic": "\nBoldface(gunilla, nerti)\nGenic(nerti)\nforall x (Boldface(x, nerti) -> Demob(nerti, gunilla))\nforall x (Demob(x, gunilla) -> Boldface(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Demob(x, gunilla) -> Drenched(gunilla))\nforall x (Cheese(x, gunilla) and not Permeative(gunilla) -> Demob(x, nerti))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> not Boldface(x, nerti))\nCheese(gunilla, nerti) and Demob(nerti, gunilla) -> Demob(gunilla, nerti)\nDrenched(gunilla) -> Demob(gunilla, nerti)\nforall x (Demob(x, nerti) and not Boldface(x, gunilla) -> not Cheese(x, nerti))\n\nGenic(nerti)\n\ntherefore Genic(nerti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The inessa arraign the roseline. The roseline is mute. If something arraign the roseline then the roseline matte the inessa. If something matte the inessa then it arraign the inessa. If something matte the inessa then the inessa is drunken. If something mussitate the inessa and the inessa is not stellate then it matte the roseline. If something is calando then it does not eat the roseline. If the inessa mussitate the roseline and the roseline matte the inessa then the inessa matte the roseline. If the inessa is drunken then the inessa matte the roseline. If something matte the roseline and it does not eat the inessa then it does not need the roseline. The inessa does not eat the roseline.", "logic": "\nArraign(inessa, roseline)\nMute(roseline)\nforall x (Arraign(x, roseline) -> Matte(roseline, inessa))\nforall x (Matte(x, inessa) -> Arraign(x, inessa))\nforall x (Matte(x, inessa) -> Drunken(inessa))\nforall x (Mussitate(x, inessa) and not Stellate(inessa) -> Matte(x, roseline))\nforall x (Calando(x) -> not Arraign(x, roseline))\nMussitate(inessa, roseline) and Matte(roseline, inessa) -> Matte(inessa, roseline)\nDrunken(inessa) -> Matte(inessa, roseline)\nforall x (Matte(x, roseline) and not Arraign(x, inessa) -> not Mussitate(x, roseline))\n\nnot Arraign(inessa, roseline)\n\ntherefore Arraign(inessa, roseline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The keene blare the sissie. The sissie is delirious. If something blare the sissie then the sissie angle the keene. If something angle the keene then it blare the keene. If something angle the keene then the keene is allusive. If something cobble the keene and the keene is not antiknock then it angle the sissie. If something is tibetan then it does not eat the sissie. If the keene cobble the sissie and the sissie angle the keene then the keene angle the sissie. If the keene is allusive then the keene angle the sissie. If something angle the sissie and it does not eat the keene then it does not need the sissie. The sissie angle the keene.", "logic": "\nBlare(keene, sissie)\nDelirious(sissie)\nforall x (Blare(x, sissie) -> Angle(sissie, keene))\nforall x (Angle(x, keene) -> Blare(x, keene))\nforall x (Angle(x, keene) -> Allusive(keene))\nforall x (Cobble(x, keene) and not Antiknock(keene) -> Angle(x, sissie))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) -> not Blare(x, sissie))\nCobble(keene, sissie) and Angle(sissie, keene) -> Angle(keene, sissie)\nAllusive(keene) -> Angle(keene, sissie)\nforall x (Angle(x, sissie) and not Blare(x, keene) -> not Cobble(x, sissie))\n\nAngle(sissie, keene)\n\nBlare(keene, sissie) and forall x (Blare(x, sissie) -> Angle(sissie, keene)) -> therefore Angle(sissie, keene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The ranna book the kelvin. The kelvin is grungy. If something book the kelvin then the kelvin babbitt the ranna. If something babbitt the ranna then it book the ranna. If something babbitt the ranna then the ranna is bisexual. If something flout the ranna and the ranna is not erasmian then it babbitt the kelvin. If something is burlesque then it does not eat the kelvin. If the ranna flout the kelvin and the kelvin babbitt the ranna then the ranna babbitt the kelvin. If the ranna is bisexual then the ranna babbitt the kelvin. If something babbitt the kelvin and it does not eat the ranna then it does not need the kelvin. The kelvin does not see the ranna.", "logic": "\nBook(ranna, kelvin)\nGrungy(kelvin)\nforall x (Book(x, kelvin) -> Babbitt(kelvin, ranna))\nforall x (Babbitt(x, ranna) -> Book(x, ranna))\nforall x (Babbitt(x, ranna) -> Bisexual(ranna))\nforall x (Flout(x, ranna) and not Erasmian(ranna) -> Babbitt(x, kelvin))\nforall x (Burlesque(x) -> not Book(x, kelvin))\nFlout(ranna, kelvin) and Babbitt(kelvin, ranna) -> Babbitt(ranna, kelvin)\nBisexual(ranna) -> Babbitt(ranna, kelvin)\nforall x (Babbitt(x, kelvin) and not Book(x, ranna) -> not Flout(x, kelvin))\n\nnot Babbitt(kelvin, ranna)\n\nBook(ranna, kelvin) and forall x (Book(x, kelvin) -> Babbitt(kelvin, ranna)) -> therefore Babbitt(kelvin, ranna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The ginger summerise the kourtney. The kourtney is unmanned. If something summerise the kourtney then the kourtney erupt the ginger. If something erupt the ginger then it summerise the ginger. If something erupt the ginger then the ginger is unselfish. If something hurrah the ginger and the ginger is not demented then it erupt the kourtney. If something is bribable then it does not eat the kourtney. If the ginger hurrah the kourtney and the kourtney erupt the ginger then the ginger erupt the kourtney. If the ginger is unselfish then the ginger erupt the kourtney. If something erupt the kourtney and it does not eat the ginger then it does not need the kourtney. The kourtney summerise the ginger.", "logic": "\nSummerise(ginger, kourtney)\nUnmanned(kourtney)\nforall x (Summerise(x, kourtney) -> Erupt(kourtney, ginger))\nforall x (Erupt(x, ginger) -> Summerise(x, ginger))\nforall x (Erupt(x, ginger) -> Unselfish(ginger))\nforall x (Hurrah(x, ginger) and not Demented(ginger) -> Erupt(x, kourtney))\nforall x (Bribable(x) -> not Summerise(x, kourtney))\nHurrah(ginger, kourtney) and Erupt(kourtney, ginger) -> Erupt(ginger, kourtney)\nUnselfish(ginger) -> Erupt(ginger, kourtney)\nforall x (Erupt(x, kourtney) and not Summerise(x, ginger) -> not Hurrah(x, kourtney))\n\nSummerise(kourtney, ginger)\n\nSummerise(ginger, kourtney) and forall x (Summerise(x, kourtney) -> Erupt(kourtney, ginger)) -> therefore Erupt(kourtney, ginger) Erupt(kourtney, ginger) and forall x (Erupt(x, ginger) -> Summerise(x, ginger)) -> therefore Summerise(kourtney, ginger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The waldon cycle the heinz. The heinz is monopteral. If something cycle the heinz then the heinz regard the waldon. If something regard the waldon then it cycle the waldon. If something regard the waldon then the waldon is impeded. If something void the waldon and the waldon is not intermural then it regard the heinz. If something is shrimpy then it does not eat the heinz. If the waldon void the heinz and the heinz regard the waldon then the waldon regard the heinz. If the waldon is impeded then the waldon regard the heinz. If something regard the heinz and it does not eat the waldon then it does not need the heinz. The heinz does not eat the waldon.", "logic": "\nCycle(waldon, heinz)\nMonopteral(heinz)\nforall x (Cycle(x, heinz) -> Regard(heinz, waldon))\nforall x (Regard(x, waldon) -> Cycle(x, waldon))\nforall x (Regard(x, waldon) -> Impeded(waldon))\nforall x (Void(x, waldon) and not Intermural(waldon) -> Regard(x, heinz))\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> not Cycle(x, heinz))\nVoid(waldon, heinz) and Regard(heinz, waldon) -> Regard(waldon, heinz)\nImpeded(waldon) -> Regard(waldon, heinz)\nforall x (Regard(x, heinz) and not Cycle(x, waldon) -> not Void(x, heinz))\n\nnot Cycle(heinz, waldon)\n\nCycle(waldon, heinz) and forall x (Cycle(x, heinz) -> Regard(heinz, waldon)) -> therefore Regard(heinz, waldon) Regard(heinz, waldon) and forall x (Regard(x, waldon) -> Cycle(x, waldon)) -> therefore Cycle(heinz, waldon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The cloe feed the harwell. The harwell is nonracial. If something feed the harwell then the harwell benight the cloe. If something benight the cloe then it feed the cloe. If something benight the cloe then the cloe is emasculate. If something rework the cloe and the cloe is not miniscule then it benight the harwell. If something is unfilled then it does not eat the harwell. If the cloe rework the harwell and the harwell benight the cloe then the cloe benight the harwell. If the cloe is emasculate then the cloe benight the harwell. If something benight the harwell and it does not eat the cloe then it does not need the harwell. The cloe benight the harwell.", "logic": "\nFeed(cloe, harwell)\nNonracial(harwell)\nforall x (Feed(x, harwell) -> Benight(harwell, cloe))\nforall x (Benight(x, cloe) -> Feed(x, cloe))\nforall x (Benight(x, cloe) -> Emasculate(cloe))\nforall x (Rework(x, cloe) and not Miniscule(cloe) -> Benight(x, harwell))\nforall x (Unfilled(x) -> not Feed(x, harwell))\nRework(cloe, harwell) and Benight(harwell, cloe) -> Benight(cloe, harwell)\nEmasculate(cloe) -> Benight(cloe, harwell)\nforall x (Benight(x, harwell) and not Feed(x, cloe) -> not Rework(x, harwell))\n\nBenight(cloe, harwell)\n\nFeed(cloe, harwell) and forall x (Feed(x, harwell) -> Benight(harwell, cloe)) -> therefore Benight(harwell, cloe) Benight(harwell, cloe) and forall x (Benight(x, cloe) -> Emasculate(cloe)) -> therefore Emasculate(cloe) Emasculate(cloe) and Emasculate(cloe) -> Benight(cloe, harwell) -> therefore Benight(cloe, harwell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The kalil trademark the benedetta. The benedetta is unseeing. If something trademark the benedetta then the benedetta prophesy the kalil. If something prophesy the kalil then it trademark the kalil. If something prophesy the kalil then the kalil is borderline. If something bate the kalil and the kalil is not reactive then it prophesy the benedetta. If something is unquotable then it does not eat the benedetta. If the kalil bate the benedetta and the benedetta prophesy the kalil then the kalil prophesy the benedetta. If the kalil is borderline then the kalil prophesy the benedetta. If something prophesy the benedetta and it does not eat the kalil then it does not need the benedetta. The kalil does not see the benedetta.", "logic": "\nTrademark(kalil, benedetta)\nUnseeing(benedetta)\nforall x (Trademark(x, benedetta) -> Prophesy(benedetta, kalil))\nforall x (Prophesy(x, kalil) -> Trademark(x, kalil))\nforall x (Prophesy(x, kalil) -> Borderline(kalil))\nforall x (Bate(x, kalil) and not Reactive(kalil) -> Prophesy(x, benedetta))\nforall x (Unquotable(x) -> not Trademark(x, benedetta))\nBate(kalil, benedetta) and Prophesy(benedetta, kalil) -> Prophesy(kalil, benedetta)\nBorderline(kalil) -> Prophesy(kalil, benedetta)\nforall x (Prophesy(x, benedetta) and not Trademark(x, kalil) -> not Bate(x, benedetta))\n\nnot Prophesy(kalil, benedetta)\n\nTrademark(kalil, benedetta) and forall x (Trademark(x, benedetta) -> Prophesy(benedetta, kalil)) -> therefore Prophesy(benedetta, kalil) Prophesy(benedetta, kalil) and forall x (Prophesy(x, kalil) -> Borderline(kalil)) -> therefore Borderline(kalil) Borderline(kalil) and Borderline(kalil) -> Prophesy(kalil, benedetta) -> therefore Prophesy(kalil, benedetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The derron impinge the kath. The kath is consolable. If something impinge the kath then the kath blackwash the derron. If something blackwash the derron then it impinge the derron. If something blackwash the derron then the derron is postmortem. If something leer the derron and the derron is not incendiary then it blackwash the kath. If something is chiasmal then it does not eat the kath. If the derron leer the kath and the kath blackwash the derron then the derron blackwash the kath. If the derron is postmortem then the derron blackwash the kath. If something blackwash the kath and it does not eat the derron then it does not need the kath. The derron does not eat the derron.", "logic": "\nImpinge(derron, kath)\nConsolable(kath)\nforall x (Impinge(x, kath) -> Blackwash(kath, derron))\nforall x (Blackwash(x, derron) -> Impinge(x, derron))\nforall x (Blackwash(x, derron) -> Postmortem(derron))\nforall x (Leer(x, derron) and not Incendiary(derron) -> Blackwash(x, kath))\nforall x (Chiasmal(x) -> not Impinge(x, kath))\nLeer(derron, kath) and Blackwash(kath, derron) -> Blackwash(derron, kath)\nPostmortem(derron) -> Blackwash(derron, kath)\nforall x (Blackwash(x, kath) and not Impinge(x, derron) -> not Leer(x, kath))\n\nnot Impinge(derron, derron)\n\nforall x (Blackwash(x, derron) -> Impinge(x, derron)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The talia recommence the armand. The armand is bleary. If something recommence the armand then the armand lyophilise the talia. If something lyophilise the talia then it recommence the talia. If something lyophilise the talia then the talia is brunet. If something damascene the talia and the talia is not pathologic then it lyophilise the armand. If something is premium then it does not eat the armand. If the talia damascene the armand and the armand lyophilise the talia then the talia lyophilise the armand. If the talia is brunet then the talia lyophilise the armand. If something lyophilise the armand and it does not eat the talia then it does not need the armand. The armand lyophilise the armand.", "logic": "\nRecommence(talia, armand)\nBleary(armand)\nforall x (Recommence(x, armand) -> Lyophilise(armand, talia))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, talia) -> Recommence(x, talia))\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, talia) -> Brunet(talia))\nforall x (Damascene(x, talia) and not Pathologic(talia) -> Lyophilise(x, armand))\nforall x (Premium(x) -> not Recommence(x, armand))\nDamascene(talia, armand) and Lyophilise(armand, talia) -> Lyophilise(talia, armand)\nBrunet(talia) -> Lyophilise(talia, armand)\nforall x (Lyophilise(x, armand) and not Recommence(x, talia) -> not Damascene(x, armand))\n\nLyophilise(armand, armand)\n\nforall x (Damascene(x, talia) and not Pathologic(talia) -> Lyophilise(x, armand)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The opalina second the tabbitha. The tabbitha is unmodified. If something second the tabbitha then the tabbitha sauce the opalina. If something sauce the opalina then it second the opalina. If something sauce the opalina then the opalina is consultive. If something shrive the opalina and the opalina is not fabled then it sauce the tabbitha. If something is powerful then it does not eat the tabbitha. If the opalina shrive the tabbitha and the tabbitha sauce the opalina then the opalina sauce the tabbitha. If the opalina is consultive then the opalina sauce the tabbitha. If something sauce the tabbitha and it does not eat the opalina then it does not need the tabbitha. The tabbitha does not eat the tabbitha.", "logic": "\nSecond(opalina, tabbitha)\nUnmodified(tabbitha)\nforall x (Second(x, tabbitha) -> Sauce(tabbitha, opalina))\nforall x (Sauce(x, opalina) -> Second(x, opalina))\nforall x (Sauce(x, opalina) -> Consultive(opalina))\nforall x (Shrive(x, opalina) and not Fabled(opalina) -> Sauce(x, tabbitha))\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> not Second(x, tabbitha))\nShrive(opalina, tabbitha) and Sauce(tabbitha, opalina) -> Sauce(opalina, tabbitha)\nConsultive(opalina) -> Sauce(opalina, tabbitha)\nforall x (Sauce(x, tabbitha) and not Second(x, opalina) -> not Shrive(x, tabbitha))\n\nnot Second(tabbitha, tabbitha)\n\nnot Second(tabbitha, tabbitha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The clerissa pout the jenni. The jenni is monandrous. If something pout the jenni then the jenni ptyalise the clerissa. If something ptyalise the clerissa then it pout the clerissa. If something ptyalise the clerissa then the clerissa is taxonomic. If something coconspire the clerissa and the clerissa is not exuberant then it ptyalise the jenni. If something is sedulous then it does not eat the jenni. If the clerissa coconspire the jenni and the jenni ptyalise the clerissa then the clerissa ptyalise the jenni. If the clerissa is taxonomic then the clerissa ptyalise the jenni. If something ptyalise the jenni and it does not eat the clerissa then it does not need the jenni. The clerissa coconspire the jenni.", "logic": "\nPout(clerissa, jenni)\nMonandrous(jenni)\nforall x (Pout(x, jenni) -> Ptyalise(jenni, clerissa))\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, clerissa) -> Pout(x, clerissa))\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, clerissa) -> Taxonomic(clerissa))\nforall x (Coconspire(x, clerissa) and not Exuberant(clerissa) -> Ptyalise(x, jenni))\nforall x (Sedulous(x) -> not Pout(x, jenni))\nCoconspire(clerissa, jenni) and Ptyalise(jenni, clerissa) -> Ptyalise(clerissa, jenni)\nTaxonomic(clerissa) -> Ptyalise(clerissa, jenni)\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, jenni) and not Pout(x, clerissa) -> not Coconspire(x, jenni))\n\nCoconspire(clerissa, jenni)\n\nCoconspire(clerissa, jenni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The karl scramble the imelda. The imelda is monocled. If something scramble the imelda then the imelda truncate the karl. If something truncate the karl then it scramble the karl. If something truncate the karl then the karl is harrowing. If something chaffer the karl and the karl is not sophistic then it truncate the imelda. If something is olden then it does not eat the imelda. If the karl chaffer the imelda and the imelda truncate the karl then the karl truncate the imelda. If the karl is harrowing then the karl truncate the imelda. If something truncate the imelda and it does not eat the karl then it does not need the imelda. The karl is not olden.", "logic": "\nScramble(karl, imelda)\nMonocled(imelda)\nforall x (Scramble(x, imelda) -> Truncate(imelda, karl))\nforall x (Truncate(x, karl) -> Scramble(x, karl))\nforall x (Truncate(x, karl) -> Harrowing(karl))\nforall x (Chaffer(x, karl) and not Sophistic(karl) -> Truncate(x, imelda))\nforall x (Olden(x) -> not Scramble(x, imelda))\nChaffer(karl, imelda) and Truncate(imelda, karl) -> Truncate(karl, imelda)\nHarrowing(karl) -> Truncate(karl, imelda)\nforall x (Truncate(x, imelda) and not Scramble(x, karl) -> not Chaffer(x, imelda))\n\nnot Olden(karl)\n\nnot Olden(karl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The ernest damn the malvina. The malvina is ellipsoid. If something damn the malvina then the malvina condition the ernest. If something condition the ernest then it damn the ernest. If something condition the ernest then the ernest is cerous. If something freight the ernest and the ernest is not choragic then it condition the malvina. If something is grown then it does not eat the malvina. If the ernest freight the malvina and the malvina condition the ernest then the ernest condition the malvina. If the ernest is cerous then the ernest condition the malvina. If something condition the malvina and it does not eat the ernest then it does not need the malvina. The malvina is choragic.", "logic": "\nDamn(ernest, malvina)\nEllipsoid(malvina)\nforall x (Damn(x, malvina) -> Condition(malvina, ernest))\nforall x (Condition(x, ernest) -> Damn(x, ernest))\nforall x (Condition(x, ernest) -> Cerous(ernest))\nforall x (Freight(x, ernest) and not Choragic(ernest) -> Condition(x, malvina))\nforall x (Grown(x) -> not Damn(x, malvina))\nFreight(ernest, malvina) and Condition(malvina, ernest) -> Condition(ernest, malvina)\nCerous(ernest) -> Condition(ernest, malvina)\nforall x (Condition(x, malvina) and not Damn(x, ernest) -> not Freight(x, malvina))\n\nChoragic(malvina)\n\nChoragic(malvina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The morganne reread the aviva. The aviva is vegetative. If something reread the aviva then the aviva enquire the morganne. If something enquire the morganne then it reread the morganne. If something enquire the morganne then the morganne is bushy. If something decide the morganne and the morganne is not untrained then it enquire the aviva. If something is antsy then it does not eat the aviva. If the morganne decide the aviva and the aviva enquire the morganne then the morganne enquire the aviva. If the morganne is bushy then the morganne enquire the aviva. If something enquire the aviva and it does not eat the morganne then it does not need the aviva. The aviva does not need the aviva.", "logic": "\nReread(morganne, aviva)\nVegetative(aviva)\nforall x (Reread(x, aviva) -> Enquire(aviva, morganne))\nforall x (Enquire(x, morganne) -> Reread(x, morganne))\nforall x (Enquire(x, morganne) -> Bushy(morganne))\nforall x (Decide(x, morganne) and not Untrained(morganne) -> Enquire(x, aviva))\nforall x (Antsy(x) -> not Reread(x, aviva))\nDecide(morganne, aviva) and Enquire(aviva, morganne) -> Enquire(morganne, aviva)\nBushy(morganne) -> Enquire(morganne, aviva)\nforall x (Enquire(x, aviva) and not Reread(x, morganne) -> not Decide(x, aviva))\n\nnot Decide(aviva, aviva)\n\nnot Decide(aviva, aviva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The lee fringe the larisa. The larisa is incan. If something fringe the larisa then the larisa bowse the lee. If something bowse the lee then it fringe the lee. If something bowse the lee then the lee is commercial. If something pulse the lee and the lee is not boring then it bowse the larisa. If something is dioestrous then it does not eat the larisa. If the lee pulse the larisa and the larisa bowse the lee then the lee bowse the larisa. If the lee is commercial then the lee bowse the larisa. If something bowse the larisa and it does not eat the lee then it does not need the larisa. The larisa is kind.", "logic": "\nFringe(lee, larisa)\nIncan(larisa)\nforall x (Fringe(x, larisa) -> Bowse(larisa, lee))\nforall x (Bowse(x, lee) -> Fringe(x, lee))\nforall x (Bowse(x, lee) -> Commercial(lee))\nforall x (Pulse(x, lee) and not Boring(lee) -> Bowse(x, larisa))\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) -> not Fringe(x, larisa))\nPulse(lee, larisa) and Bowse(larisa, lee) -> Bowse(lee, larisa)\nCommercial(lee) -> Bowse(lee, larisa)\nforall x (Bowse(x, larisa) and not Fringe(x, lee) -> not Pulse(x, larisa))\n\nKind(larisa)\n\nKind(larisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1379"} {"premises": "The georgeta is abstruse. The lay supply the jacquetta. The chicky supply the jacquetta. The jacquetta is equatorial. If someone alkalinise the georgeta then the georgeta supply the lay. The chicky supply the jacquetta.", "logic": "\nAbstruse(georgeta)\nSupply(lay, jacquetta)\nSupply(chicky, jacquetta)\nEquatorial(jacquetta)\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, georgeta) -> Supply(georgeta, lay))\n\nSupply(chicky, jacquetta)\n\ntherefore Supply(chicky, jacquetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4513"} {"premises": "The roberta is lazy. The gerianne rearrange the gerrit. The mitzi rearrange the gerrit. The gerrit is whole. If someone burp the roberta then the roberta rearrange the gerianne. The roberta is not lazy.", "logic": "\nLazy(roberta)\nRearrange(gerianne, gerrit)\nRearrange(mitzi, gerrit)\nWhole(gerrit)\nforall x (Burp(x, roberta) -> Rearrange(roberta, gerianne))\n\nnot Lazy(roberta)\n\ntherefore Lazy(roberta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4513"} {"premises": "The tome is serene. The dennis connote the darci. The gershom connote the darci. The darci is irritated. If someone spue the tome then the tome connote the dennis. The tome does not see the dennis.", "logic": "\nSerene(tome)\nConnote(dennis, darci)\nConnote(gershom, darci)\nIrritated(darci)\nforall x (Spue(x, tome) -> Connote(tome, dennis))\n\nnot Connote(tome, dennis)\n\nforall x (Spue(x, tome) -> Connote(tome, dennis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4513"} {"premises": "The alfie is shoreward. The christen virilise the traver. The monroe virilise the traver. The traver is barbadian. If someone adventure the alfie then the alfie virilise the christen. The traver visits the traver.", "logic": "\nShoreward(alfie)\nVirilise(christen, traver)\nVirilise(monroe, traver)\nBarbadian(traver)\nforall x (Adventure(x, alfie) -> Virilise(alfie, christen))\n\nVisits(traver, traver)\n\nVisits(traver, traver) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4513"} {"premises": "Ximenez is beetle. Corabella is murmurous. Julian is murmurous. All hyperopic people are beetle. All murmurous, beetle people are degrading. If someone is murmurous then they are hyperopic. Smart, murmurous people are hyperopic. All probative people are hyperopic. Smart, degrading people are nonhairy. Corabella is murmurous.", "logic": "\nBeetle(ximenez)\nMurmurous(corabella)\nMurmurous(julian)\nforall x (Hyperopic(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Murmurous(x) and Beetle(x) -> Degrading(x))\nforall x (Murmurous(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x) and Murmurous(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Probative(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x) and Degrading(x) -> Nonhairy(x))\n\nMurmurous(corabella)\n\ntherefore Murmurous(corabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Annora is mellow. Perrine is alluvial. Mayor is alluvial. All sottish people are mellow. All alluvial, mellow people are unsoiled. If someone is alluvial then they are sottish. Smart, alluvial people are sottish. All propellant people are sottish. Smart, unsoiled people are endogamic. Annora is not mellow.", "logic": "\nMellow(annora)\nAlluvial(perrine)\nAlluvial(mayor)\nforall x (Sottish(x) -> Mellow(x))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) and Mellow(x) -> Unsoiled(x))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Mellow(x) and Alluvial(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Propellant(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Mellow(x) and Unsoiled(x) -> Endogamic(x))\n\nnot Mellow(annora)\n\ntherefore Mellow(annora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Pier is kinky. Gerhard is avestan. Dita is avestan. All medicative people are kinky. All avestan, kinky people are fledged. If someone is avestan then they are medicative. Smart, avestan people are medicative. All doughy people are medicative. Smart, fledged people are illiberal. Dita is medicative.", "logic": "\nKinky(pier)\nAvestan(gerhard)\nAvestan(dita)\nforall x (Medicative(x) -> Kinky(x))\nforall x (Avestan(x) and Kinky(x) -> Fledged(x))\nforall x (Avestan(x) -> Medicative(x))\nforall x (Kinky(x) and Avestan(x) -> Medicative(x))\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Medicative(x))\nforall x (Kinky(x) and Fledged(x) -> Illiberal(x))\n\nMedicative(dita)\n\nAvestan(dita) and forall x (Avestan(x) -> Medicative(x)) -> therefore Medicative(dita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Kylynn is floored. Rennie is thinned. Kamillah is thinned. All tusked people are floored. All thinned, floored people are expositive. If someone is thinned then they are tusked. Smart, thinned people are tusked. All phosphoric people are tusked. Smart, expositive people are median. Rennie is not tusked.", "logic": "\nFloored(kylynn)\nThinned(rennie)\nThinned(kamillah)\nforall x (Tusked(x) -> Floored(x))\nforall x (Thinned(x) and Floored(x) -> Expositive(x))\nforall x (Thinned(x) -> Tusked(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) and Thinned(x) -> Tusked(x))\nforall x (Phosphoric(x) -> Tusked(x))\nforall x (Floored(x) and Expositive(x) -> Median(x))\n\nnot Tusked(rennie)\n\nThinned(rennie) and forall x (Thinned(x) -> Tusked(x)) -> therefore Tusked(rennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Devin is ungual. Jermayne is tropic. Nolan is tropic. All blest people are ungual. All tropic, ungual people are unannealed. If someone is tropic then they are blest. Smart, tropic people are blest. All directive people are blest. Smart, unannealed people are rhymed. Nolan is ungual.", "logic": "\nUngual(devin)\nTropic(jermayne)\nTropic(nolan)\nforall x (Blest(x) -> Ungual(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) and Ungual(x) -> Unannealed(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) and Tropic(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Directive(x) -> Blest(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) and Unannealed(x) -> Rhymed(x))\n\nUngual(nolan)\n\nTropic(nolan) and forall x (Tropic(x) -> Blest(x)) -> therefore Blest(nolan) Blest(nolan) and forall x (Blest(x) -> Ungual(x)) -> therefore Ungual(nolan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Calhoun is vocal. Jacqui is nettlesome. Ellie is nettlesome. All endogenous people are vocal. All nettlesome, vocal people are grey. If someone is nettlesome then they are endogenous. Smart, nettlesome people are endogenous. All unstained people are endogenous. Smart, grey people are tagged. Ellie is not vocal.", "logic": "\nVocal(calhoun)\nNettlesome(jacqui)\nNettlesome(ellie)\nforall x (Endogenous(x) -> Vocal(x))\nforall x (Nettlesome(x) and Vocal(x) -> Grey(x))\nforall x (Nettlesome(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Vocal(x) and Nettlesome(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Unstained(x) -> Endogenous(x))\nforall x (Vocal(x) and Grey(x) -> Tagged(x))\n\nnot Vocal(ellie)\n\nNettlesome(ellie) and forall x (Nettlesome(x) -> Endogenous(x)) -> therefore Endogenous(ellie) Endogenous(ellie) and forall x (Endogenous(x) -> Vocal(x)) -> therefore Vocal(ellie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Miquela is proof. Billi is cervical. Tiffanie is cervical. All thermoset people are proof. All cervical, proof people are artistic. If someone is cervical then they are thermoset. Smart, cervical people are thermoset. All blinded people are thermoset. Smart, artistic people are paunchy. Tiffanie is artistic.", "logic": "\nProof(miquela)\nCervical(billi)\nCervical(tiffanie)\nforall x (Thermoset(x) -> Proof(x))\nforall x (Cervical(x) and Proof(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Thermoset(x))\nforall x (Proof(x) and Cervical(x) -> Thermoset(x))\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Thermoset(x))\nforall x (Proof(x) and Artistic(x) -> Paunchy(x))\n\nArtistic(tiffanie)\n\nCervical(tiffanie) and forall x (Cervical(x) -> Thermoset(x)) -> therefore Thermoset(tiffanie) Thermoset(tiffanie) and forall x (Thermoset(x) -> Proof(x)) -> therefore Proof(tiffanie) Cervical(tiffanie) and Proof(tiffanie) and forall x (Cervical(x) and Proof(x) -> Artistic(x)) -> therefore Artistic(tiffanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Lissie is sanitised. Neila is lyrical. Martynne is lyrical. All napping people are sanitised. All lyrical, sanitised people are arminian. If someone is lyrical then they are napping. Smart, lyrical people are napping. All fungal people are napping. Smart, arminian people are hemostatic. Neila is not arminian.", "logic": "\nSanitised(lissie)\nLyrical(neila)\nLyrical(martynne)\nforall x (Napping(x) -> Sanitised(x))\nforall x (Lyrical(x) and Sanitised(x) -> Arminian(x))\nforall x (Lyrical(x) -> Napping(x))\nforall x (Sanitised(x) and Lyrical(x) -> Napping(x))\nforall x (Fungal(x) -> Napping(x))\nforall x (Sanitised(x) and Arminian(x) -> Hemostatic(x))\n\nnot Arminian(neila)\n\nLyrical(neila) and forall x (Lyrical(x) -> Napping(x)) -> therefore Napping(neila) Napping(neila) and forall x (Napping(x) -> Sanitised(x)) -> therefore Sanitised(neila) Lyrical(neila) and Sanitised(neila) and forall x (Lyrical(x) and Sanitised(x) -> Arminian(x)) -> therefore Arminian(neila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Sissy is octuple. Oprah is gradable. Ivette is gradable. All toothsome people are octuple. All gradable, octuple people are nuts. If someone is gradable then they are toothsome. Smart, gradable people are toothsome. All bellying people are toothsome. Smart, nuts people are noncausal. Sissy is not noncausal.", "logic": "\nOctuple(sissy)\nGradable(oprah)\nGradable(ivette)\nforall x (Toothsome(x) -> Octuple(x))\nforall x (Gradable(x) and Octuple(x) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Octuple(x) and Gradable(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Bellying(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Octuple(x) and Nuts(x) -> Noncausal(x))\n\nnot Noncausal(sissy)\n\nforall x (Octuple(x) and Nuts(x) -> Noncausal(x)) <- forall x (Gradable(x) and Octuple(x) -> Nuts(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Rafaelia is diatonic. Susy is craved. Dustin is craved. All shavian people are diatonic. All craved, diatonic people are molar. If someone is craved then they are shavian. Smart, craved people are shavian. All textured people are shavian. Smart, molar people are oleophilic. Rafaelia is shavian.", "logic": "\nDiatonic(rafaelia)\nCraved(susy)\nCraved(dustin)\nforall x (Shavian(x) -> Diatonic(x))\nforall x (Craved(x) and Diatonic(x) -> Molar(x))\nforall x (Craved(x) -> Shavian(x))\nforall x (Diatonic(x) and Craved(x) -> Shavian(x))\nforall x (Textured(x) -> Shavian(x))\nforall x (Diatonic(x) and Molar(x) -> Oleophilic(x))\n\nShavian(rafaelia)\n\nforall x (Craved(x) -> Shavian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Adey is marginal. Gabrila is fascinated. Darcy is fascinated. All neotenous people are marginal. All fascinated, marginal people are togged. If someone is fascinated then they are neotenous. Smart, fascinated people are neotenous. All amok people are neotenous. Smart, togged people are benign. Adey is not togged.", "logic": "\nMarginal(adey)\nFascinated(gabrila)\nFascinated(darcy)\nforall x (Neotenous(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Fascinated(x) and Marginal(x) -> Togged(x))\nforall x (Fascinated(x) -> Neotenous(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) and Fascinated(x) -> Neotenous(x))\nforall x (Amok(x) -> Neotenous(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) and Togged(x) -> Benign(x))\n\nnot Togged(adey)\n\nforall x (Fascinated(x) and Marginal(x) -> Togged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Amalia is paediatric. Bengt is earnest. Benson is earnest. All underhand people are paediatric. All earnest, paediatric people are totipotent. If someone is earnest then they are underhand. Smart, earnest people are underhand. All dolomitic people are underhand. Smart, totipotent people are greenish. Amalia is green.", "logic": "\nPaediatric(amalia)\nEarnest(bengt)\nEarnest(benson)\nforall x (Underhand(x) -> Paediatric(x))\nforall x (Earnest(x) and Paediatric(x) -> Totipotent(x))\nforall x (Earnest(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) and Earnest(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Dolomitic(x) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Paediatric(x) and Totipotent(x) -> Greenish(x))\n\nGreen(amalia)\n\nGreen(amalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Kali is vacillant. Heddi is capsular. Rudd is capsular. All thinned people are vacillant. All capsular, vacillant people are ailing. If someone is capsular then they are thinned. Smart, capsular people are thinned. All colonized people are thinned. Smart, ailing people are liege. Kali is not colonized.", "logic": "\nVacillant(kali)\nCapsular(heddi)\nCapsular(rudd)\nforall x (Thinned(x) -> Vacillant(x))\nforall x (Capsular(x) and Vacillant(x) -> Ailing(x))\nforall x (Capsular(x) -> Thinned(x))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) and Capsular(x) -> Thinned(x))\nforall x (Colonized(x) -> Thinned(x))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) and Ailing(x) -> Liege(x))\n\nnot Colonized(kali)\n\nnot Colonized(kali) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Karim is lento. Gert is foolproof. Lois is foolproof. All catarrhine people are lento. All foolproof, lento people are inimitable. If someone is foolproof then they are catarrhine. Smart, foolproof people are catarrhine. All intriguing people are catarrhine. Smart, inimitable people are oceanic. Gert is intriguing.", "logic": "\nLento(karim)\nFoolproof(gert)\nFoolproof(lois)\nforall x (Catarrhine(x) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Foolproof(x) and Lento(x) -> Inimitable(x))\nforall x (Foolproof(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Lento(x) and Foolproof(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Intriguing(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Lento(x) and Inimitable(x) -> Oceanic(x))\n\nIntriguing(gert)\n\nIntriguing(gert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Abagael is automated. Apollo is dimmed. Maryanne is dimmed. All esthetic people are automated. All dimmed, automated people are caller. If someone is dimmed then they are esthetic. Smart, dimmed people are esthetic. All ghanaian people are esthetic. Smart, caller people are implicated. Abagael is not dimmed.", "logic": "\nAutomated(abagael)\nDimmed(apollo)\nDimmed(maryanne)\nforall x (Esthetic(x) -> Automated(x))\nforall x (Dimmed(x) and Automated(x) -> Caller(x))\nforall x (Dimmed(x) -> Esthetic(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Dimmed(x) -> Esthetic(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Esthetic(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Caller(x) -> Implicated(x))\n\nnot Dimmed(abagael)\n\nnot Dimmed(abagael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "Zachary is hatched. Pepillo is smallish. Shilpa is smallish. All variolic people are hatched. All smallish, hatched people are unrecorded. If someone is smallish then they are variolic. Smart, smallish people are variolic. All invariant people are variolic. Smart, unrecorded people are bareheaded. Shilpa is green.", "logic": "\nHatched(zachary)\nSmallish(pepillo)\nSmallish(shilpa)\nforall x (Variolic(x) -> Hatched(x))\nforall x (Smallish(x) and Hatched(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\nforall x (Smallish(x) -> Variolic(x))\nforall x (Hatched(x) and Smallish(x) -> Variolic(x))\nforall x (Invariant(x) -> Variolic(x))\nforall x (Hatched(x) and Unrecorded(x) -> Bareheaded(x))\n\nGreen(shilpa)\n\nGreen(shilpa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1429"} {"premises": "The barby enslave the aviva. The barby is botswanan. The barby is reputable. The barby derail the aviva. The barby derail the orsola. The aviva enslave the orsola. The aviva is underway. The aviva churr the barby. The aviva derail the barby. The orsola is underway. The orsola is botswanan. The orsola churr the barby. The orsola churr the aviva. The orsola derail the barby. The orsola derail the aviva. If something derail the barby then it churr the aviva. If something is reputable and it churr the barby then it is tuxedoed. If something is tuxedoed and it derail the aviva then it enslave the aviva. If something enslave the barby and the barby is reputable then it is reputable. If something is botswanan and reputable then it churr the orsola. If something is underway and it derail the aviva then it enslave the barby. The barby enslave the aviva.", "logic": "\nEnslave(barby, aviva)\nBotswanan(barby)\nReputable(barby)\nDerail(barby, aviva)\nDerail(barby, orsola)\nEnslave(aviva, orsola)\nUnderway(aviva)\nChurr(aviva, barby)\nDerail(aviva, barby)\nUnderway(orsola)\nBotswanan(orsola)\nChurr(orsola, barby)\nChurr(orsola, aviva)\nDerail(orsola, barby)\nDerail(orsola, aviva)\nforall x (Derail(x, barby) -> Churr(x, aviva))\nforall x (Reputable(x) and Churr(x, barby) -> Tuxedoed(x))\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) and Derail(x, aviva) -> Enslave(x, aviva))\nforall x (Enslave(x, barby) and Reputable(barby) -> Reputable(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Reputable(x) -> Churr(x, orsola))\nforall x (Underway(x) and Derail(x, aviva) -> Enslave(x, barby))\n\nEnslave(barby, aviva)\n\ntherefore Enslave(barby, aviva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The arielle cavort the melisenda. The arielle is disclike. The arielle is adpressed. The arielle shun the melisenda. The arielle shun the rheta. The melisenda cavort the rheta. The melisenda is derisory. The melisenda regulate the arielle. The melisenda shun the arielle. The rheta is derisory. The rheta is disclike. The rheta regulate the arielle. The rheta regulate the melisenda. The rheta shun the arielle. The rheta shun the melisenda. If something shun the arielle then it regulate the melisenda. If something is adpressed and it regulate the arielle then it is midmost. If something is midmost and it shun the melisenda then it cavort the melisenda. If something cavort the arielle and the arielle is adpressed then it is adpressed. If something is disclike and adpressed then it regulate the rheta. If something is derisory and it shun the melisenda then it cavort the arielle. The melisenda does not like the arielle.", "logic": "\nCavort(arielle, melisenda)\nDisclike(arielle)\nAdpressed(arielle)\nShun(arielle, melisenda)\nShun(arielle, rheta)\nCavort(melisenda, rheta)\nDerisory(melisenda)\nRegulate(melisenda, arielle)\nShun(melisenda, arielle)\nDerisory(rheta)\nDisclike(rheta)\nRegulate(rheta, arielle)\nRegulate(rheta, melisenda)\nShun(rheta, arielle)\nShun(rheta, melisenda)\nforall x (Shun(x, arielle) -> Regulate(x, melisenda))\nforall x (Adpressed(x) and Regulate(x, arielle) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Midmost(x) and Shun(x, melisenda) -> Cavort(x, melisenda))\nforall x (Cavort(x, arielle) and Adpressed(arielle) -> Adpressed(x))\nforall x (Disclike(x) and Adpressed(x) -> Regulate(x, rheta))\nforall x (Derisory(x) and Shun(x, melisenda) -> Cavort(x, arielle))\n\nnot Regulate(melisenda, arielle)\n\ntherefore Regulate(melisenda, arielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The gabriel burthen the hakeem. The gabriel is calicular. The gabriel is silken. The gabriel hibachi the hakeem. The gabriel hibachi the moina. The hakeem burthen the moina. The hakeem is labile. The hakeem move the gabriel. The hakeem hibachi the gabriel. The moina is labile. The moina is calicular. The moina move the gabriel. The moina move the hakeem. The moina hibachi the gabriel. The moina hibachi the hakeem. If something hibachi the gabriel then it move the hakeem. If something is silken and it move the gabriel then it is corporeal. If something is corporeal and it hibachi the hakeem then it burthen the hakeem. If something burthen the gabriel and the gabriel is silken then it is silken. If something is calicular and silken then it move the moina. If something is labile and it hibachi the hakeem then it burthen the gabriel. The hakeem move the hakeem.", "logic": "\nBurthen(gabriel, hakeem)\nCalicular(gabriel)\nSilken(gabriel)\nHibachi(gabriel, hakeem)\nHibachi(gabriel, moina)\nBurthen(hakeem, moina)\nLabile(hakeem)\nMove(hakeem, gabriel)\nHibachi(hakeem, gabriel)\nLabile(moina)\nCalicular(moina)\nMove(moina, gabriel)\nMove(moina, hakeem)\nHibachi(moina, gabriel)\nHibachi(moina, hakeem)\nforall x (Hibachi(x, gabriel) -> Move(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Silken(x) and Move(x, gabriel) -> Corporeal(x))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) and Hibachi(x, hakeem) -> Burthen(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Burthen(x, gabriel) and Silken(gabriel) -> Silken(x))\nforall x (Calicular(x) and Silken(x) -> Move(x, moina))\nforall x (Labile(x) and Hibachi(x, hakeem) -> Burthen(x, gabriel))\n\nMove(hakeem, hakeem)\n\nHibachi(hakeem, gabriel) and forall x (Hibachi(x, gabriel) -> Move(x, hakeem)) -> therefore Move(hakeem, hakeem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The kenneth antagonise the dunstan. The kenneth is impatient. The kenneth is crotchety. The kenneth librate the dunstan. The kenneth librate the cornelia. The dunstan antagonise the cornelia. The dunstan is faded. The dunstan exonerate the kenneth. The dunstan librate the kenneth. The cornelia is faded. The cornelia is impatient. The cornelia exonerate the kenneth. The cornelia exonerate the dunstan. The cornelia librate the kenneth. The cornelia librate the dunstan. If something librate the kenneth then it exonerate the dunstan. If something is crotchety and it exonerate the kenneth then it is underhand. If something is underhand and it librate the dunstan then it antagonise the dunstan. If something antagonise the kenneth and the kenneth is crotchety then it is crotchety. If something is impatient and crotchety then it exonerate the cornelia. If something is faded and it librate the dunstan then it antagonise the kenneth. The dunstan does not like the dunstan.", "logic": "\nAntagonise(kenneth, dunstan)\nImpatient(kenneth)\nCrotchety(kenneth)\nLibrate(kenneth, dunstan)\nLibrate(kenneth, cornelia)\nAntagonise(dunstan, cornelia)\nFaded(dunstan)\nExonerate(dunstan, kenneth)\nLibrate(dunstan, kenneth)\nFaded(cornelia)\nImpatient(cornelia)\nExonerate(cornelia, kenneth)\nExonerate(cornelia, dunstan)\nLibrate(cornelia, kenneth)\nLibrate(cornelia, dunstan)\nforall x (Librate(x, kenneth) -> Exonerate(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) and Exonerate(x, kenneth) -> Underhand(x))\nforall x (Underhand(x) and Librate(x, dunstan) -> Antagonise(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Antagonise(x, kenneth) and Crotchety(kenneth) -> Crotchety(x))\nforall x (Impatient(x) and Crotchety(x) -> Exonerate(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Faded(x) and Librate(x, dunstan) -> Antagonise(x, kenneth))\n\nnot Exonerate(dunstan, dunstan)\n\nLibrate(dunstan, kenneth) and forall x (Librate(x, kenneth) -> Exonerate(x, dunstan)) -> therefore Exonerate(dunstan, dunstan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The vaughan purpurate the sim. The vaughan is polish. The vaughan is erect. The vaughan disoblige the sim. The vaughan disoblige the cloe. The sim purpurate the cloe. The sim is uncordial. The sim amortize the vaughan. The sim disoblige the vaughan. The cloe is uncordial. The cloe is polish. The cloe amortize the vaughan. The cloe amortize the sim. The cloe disoblige the vaughan. The cloe disoblige the sim. If something disoblige the vaughan then it amortize the sim. If something is erect and it amortize the vaughan then it is orienting. If something is orienting and it disoblige the sim then it purpurate the sim. If something purpurate the vaughan and the vaughan is erect then it is erect. If something is polish and erect then it amortize the cloe. If something is uncordial and it disoblige the sim then it purpurate the vaughan. The cloe is erect.", "logic": "\nPurpurate(vaughan, sim)\nPolish(vaughan)\nErect(vaughan)\nDisoblige(vaughan, sim)\nDisoblige(vaughan, cloe)\nPurpurate(sim, cloe)\nUncordial(sim)\nAmortize(sim, vaughan)\nDisoblige(sim, vaughan)\nUncordial(cloe)\nPolish(cloe)\nAmortize(cloe, vaughan)\nAmortize(cloe, sim)\nDisoblige(cloe, vaughan)\nDisoblige(cloe, sim)\nforall x (Disoblige(x, vaughan) -> Amortize(x, sim))\nforall x (Erect(x) and Amortize(x, vaughan) -> Orienting(x))\nforall x (Orienting(x) and Disoblige(x, sim) -> Purpurate(x, sim))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, vaughan) and Erect(vaughan) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Polish(x) and Erect(x) -> Amortize(x, cloe))\nforall x (Uncordial(x) and Disoblige(x, sim) -> Purpurate(x, vaughan))\n\nErect(cloe)\n\nUncordial(cloe) and Disoblige(cloe, sim) and forall x (Uncordial(x) and Disoblige(x, sim) -> Purpurate(x, vaughan)) -> therefore Purpurate(cloe, vaughan) Purpurate(cloe, vaughan) and Erect(vaughan) and forall x (Purpurate(x, vaughan) and Erect(vaughan) -> Erect(x)) -> therefore Erect(cloe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The somerset unchurch the cammy. The somerset is frivolous. The somerset is greensick. The somerset summer the cammy. The somerset summer the son. The cammy unchurch the son. The cammy is engrossed. The cammy labor the somerset. The cammy summer the somerset. The son is engrossed. The son is frivolous. The son labor the somerset. The son labor the cammy. The son summer the somerset. The son summer the cammy. If something summer the somerset then it labor the cammy. If something is greensick and it labor the somerset then it is dotted. If something is dotted and it summer the cammy then it unchurch the cammy. If something unchurch the somerset and the somerset is greensick then it is greensick. If something is frivolous and greensick then it labor the son. If something is engrossed and it summer the cammy then it unchurch the somerset. The son is not greensick.", "logic": "\nUnchurch(somerset, cammy)\nFrivolous(somerset)\nGreensick(somerset)\nSummer(somerset, cammy)\nSummer(somerset, son)\nUnchurch(cammy, son)\nEngrossed(cammy)\nLabor(cammy, somerset)\nSummer(cammy, somerset)\nEngrossed(son)\nFrivolous(son)\nLabor(son, somerset)\nLabor(son, cammy)\nSummer(son, somerset)\nSummer(son, cammy)\nforall x (Summer(x, somerset) -> Labor(x, cammy))\nforall x (Greensick(x) and Labor(x, somerset) -> Dotted(x))\nforall x (Dotted(x) and Summer(x, cammy) -> Unchurch(x, cammy))\nforall x (Unchurch(x, somerset) and Greensick(somerset) -> Greensick(x))\nforall x (Frivolous(x) and Greensick(x) -> Labor(x, son))\nforall x (Engrossed(x) and Summer(x, cammy) -> Unchurch(x, somerset))\n\nnot Greensick(son)\n\nEngrossed(son) and Summer(son, cammy) and forall x (Engrossed(x) and Summer(x, cammy) -> Unchurch(x, somerset)) -> therefore Unchurch(son, somerset) Unchurch(son, somerset) and Greensick(somerset) and forall x (Unchurch(x, somerset) and Greensick(somerset) -> Greensick(x)) -> therefore Greensick(son)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The casi retie the roberta. The casi is martian. The casi is biped. The casi distort the roberta. The casi distort the esther. The roberta retie the esther. The roberta is rightful. The roberta casket the casi. The roberta distort the casi. The esther is rightful. The esther is martian. The esther casket the casi. The esther casket the roberta. The esther distort the casi. The esther distort the roberta. If something distort the casi then it casket the roberta. If something is biped and it casket the casi then it is damascene. If something is damascene and it distort the roberta then it retie the roberta. If something retie the casi and the casi is biped then it is biped. If something is martian and biped then it casket the esther. If something is rightful and it distort the roberta then it retie the casi. The esther casket the esther.", "logic": "\nRetie(casi, roberta)\nMartian(casi)\nBiped(casi)\nDistort(casi, roberta)\nDistort(casi, esther)\nRetie(roberta, esther)\nRightful(roberta)\nCasket(roberta, casi)\nDistort(roberta, casi)\nRightful(esther)\nMartian(esther)\nCasket(esther, casi)\nCasket(esther, roberta)\nDistort(esther, casi)\nDistort(esther, roberta)\nforall x (Distort(x, casi) -> Casket(x, roberta))\nforall x (Biped(x) and Casket(x, casi) -> Damascene(x))\nforall x (Damascene(x) and Distort(x, roberta) -> Retie(x, roberta))\nforall x (Retie(x, casi) and Biped(casi) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Martian(x) and Biped(x) -> Casket(x, esther))\nforall x (Rightful(x) and Distort(x, roberta) -> Retie(x, casi))\n\nCasket(esther, esther)\n\nRightful(esther) and Distort(esther, roberta) and forall x (Rightful(x) and Distort(x, roberta) -> Retie(x, casi)) -> therefore Retie(esther, casi) Retie(esther, casi) and Biped(casi) and forall x (Retie(x, casi) and Biped(casi) -> Biped(x)) -> therefore Biped(esther) Martian(esther) and Biped(esther) and forall x (Martian(x) and Biped(x) -> Casket(x, esther)) -> therefore Casket(esther, esther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The sandye terrorise the barbey. The sandye is figural. The sandye is insanitary. The sandye transduce the barbey. The sandye transduce the cosmo. The barbey terrorise the cosmo. The barbey is cormous. The barbey boost the sandye. The barbey transduce the sandye. The cosmo is cormous. The cosmo is figural. The cosmo boost the sandye. The cosmo boost the barbey. The cosmo transduce the sandye. The cosmo transduce the barbey. If something transduce the sandye then it boost the barbey. If something is insanitary and it boost the sandye then it is aquiferous. If something is aquiferous and it transduce the barbey then it terrorise the barbey. If something terrorise the sandye and the sandye is insanitary then it is insanitary. If something is figural and insanitary then it boost the cosmo. If something is cormous and it transduce the barbey then it terrorise the sandye. The cosmo does not like the cosmo.", "logic": "\nTerrorise(sandye, barbey)\nFigural(sandye)\nInsanitary(sandye)\nTransduce(sandye, barbey)\nTransduce(sandye, cosmo)\nTerrorise(barbey, cosmo)\nCormous(barbey)\nBoost(barbey, sandye)\nTransduce(barbey, sandye)\nCormous(cosmo)\nFigural(cosmo)\nBoost(cosmo, sandye)\nBoost(cosmo, barbey)\nTransduce(cosmo, sandye)\nTransduce(cosmo, barbey)\nforall x (Transduce(x, sandye) -> Boost(x, barbey))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Boost(x, sandye) -> Aquiferous(x))\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) and Transduce(x, barbey) -> Terrorise(x, barbey))\nforall x (Terrorise(x, sandye) and Insanitary(sandye) -> Insanitary(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) and Insanitary(x) -> Boost(x, cosmo))\nforall x (Cormous(x) and Transduce(x, barbey) -> Terrorise(x, sandye))\n\nnot Boost(cosmo, cosmo)\n\nCormous(cosmo) and Transduce(cosmo, barbey) and forall x (Cormous(x) and Transduce(x, barbey) -> Terrorise(x, sandye)) -> therefore Terrorise(cosmo, sandye) Terrorise(cosmo, sandye) and Insanitary(sandye) and forall x (Terrorise(x, sandye) and Insanitary(sandye) -> Insanitary(x)) -> therefore Insanitary(cosmo) Figural(cosmo) and Insanitary(cosmo) and forall x (Figural(x) and Insanitary(x) -> Boost(x, cosmo)) -> therefore Boost(cosmo, cosmo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The risa docket the shawna. The risa is deferent. The risa is runproof. The risa puncture the shawna. The risa puncture the kessiah. The shawna docket the kessiah. The shawna is oxonian. The shawna instruct the risa. The shawna puncture the risa. The kessiah is oxonian. The kessiah is deferent. The kessiah instruct the risa. The kessiah instruct the shawna. The kessiah puncture the risa. The kessiah puncture the shawna. If something puncture the risa then it instruct the shawna. If something is runproof and it instruct the risa then it is warming. If something is warming and it puncture the shawna then it docket the shawna. If something docket the risa and the risa is runproof then it is runproof. If something is deferent and runproof then it instruct the kessiah. If something is oxonian and it puncture the shawna then it docket the risa. The risa is not warming.", "logic": "\nDocket(risa, shawna)\nDeferent(risa)\nRunproof(risa)\nPuncture(risa, shawna)\nPuncture(risa, kessiah)\nDocket(shawna, kessiah)\nOxonian(shawna)\nInstruct(shawna, risa)\nPuncture(shawna, risa)\nOxonian(kessiah)\nDeferent(kessiah)\nInstruct(kessiah, risa)\nInstruct(kessiah, shawna)\nPuncture(kessiah, risa)\nPuncture(kessiah, shawna)\nforall x (Puncture(x, risa) -> Instruct(x, shawna))\nforall x (Runproof(x) and Instruct(x, risa) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) and Puncture(x, shawna) -> Docket(x, shawna))\nforall x (Docket(x, risa) and Runproof(risa) -> Runproof(x))\nforall x (Deferent(x) and Runproof(x) -> Instruct(x, kessiah))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) and Puncture(x, shawna) -> Docket(x, risa))\n\nnot Warming(risa)\n\nforall x (Runproof(x) and Instruct(x, risa) -> Warming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The gustie obtrude the tova. The gustie is panamanian. The gustie is praiseful. The gustie ooze the tova. The gustie ooze the rex. The tova obtrude the rex. The tova is wysiwyg. The tova unclasp the gustie. The tova ooze the gustie. The rex is wysiwyg. The rex is panamanian. The rex unclasp the gustie. The rex unclasp the tova. The rex ooze the gustie. The rex ooze the tova. If something ooze the gustie then it unclasp the tova. If something is praiseful and it unclasp the gustie then it is yogistic. If something is yogistic and it ooze the tova then it obtrude the tova. If something obtrude the gustie and the gustie is praiseful then it is praiseful. If something is panamanian and praiseful then it unclasp the rex. If something is wysiwyg and it ooze the tova then it obtrude the gustie. The gustie obtrude the gustie.", "logic": "\nObtrude(gustie, tova)\nPanamanian(gustie)\nPraiseful(gustie)\nOoze(gustie, tova)\nOoze(gustie, rex)\nObtrude(tova, rex)\nWysiwyg(tova)\nUnclasp(tova, gustie)\nOoze(tova, gustie)\nWysiwyg(rex)\nPanamanian(rex)\nUnclasp(rex, gustie)\nUnclasp(rex, tova)\nOoze(rex, gustie)\nOoze(rex, tova)\nforall x (Ooze(x, gustie) -> Unclasp(x, tova))\nforall x (Praiseful(x) and Unclasp(x, gustie) -> Yogistic(x))\nforall x (Yogistic(x) and Ooze(x, tova) -> Obtrude(x, tova))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, gustie) and Praiseful(gustie) -> Praiseful(x))\nforall x (Panamanian(x) and Praiseful(x) -> Unclasp(x, rex))\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) and Ooze(x, tova) -> Obtrude(x, gustie))\n\nObtrude(gustie, gustie)\n\nforall x (Wysiwyg(x) and Ooze(x, tova) -> Obtrude(x, gustie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The kip pedal the heddie. The kip is hardbound. The kip is barefoot. The kip broadside the heddie. The kip broadside the birgitta. The heddie pedal the birgitta. The heddie is xxviii. The heddie luge the kip. The heddie broadside the kip. The birgitta is xxviii. The birgitta is hardbound. The birgitta luge the kip. The birgitta luge the heddie. The birgitta broadside the kip. The birgitta broadside the heddie. If something broadside the kip then it luge the heddie. If something is barefoot and it luge the kip then it is praetorial. If something is praetorial and it broadside the heddie then it pedal the heddie. If something pedal the kip and the kip is barefoot then it is barefoot. If something is hardbound and barefoot then it luge the birgitta. If something is xxviii and it broadside the heddie then it pedal the kip. The heddie does not chase the heddie.", "logic": "\nPedal(kip, heddie)\nHardbound(kip)\nBarefoot(kip)\nBroadside(kip, heddie)\nBroadside(kip, birgitta)\nPedal(heddie, birgitta)\nXxviii(heddie)\nLuge(heddie, kip)\nBroadside(heddie, kip)\nXxviii(birgitta)\nHardbound(birgitta)\nLuge(birgitta, kip)\nLuge(birgitta, heddie)\nBroadside(birgitta, kip)\nBroadside(birgitta, heddie)\nforall x (Broadside(x, kip) -> Luge(x, heddie))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Luge(x, kip) -> Praetorial(x))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) and Broadside(x, heddie) -> Pedal(x, heddie))\nforall x (Pedal(x, kip) and Barefoot(kip) -> Barefoot(x))\nforall x (Hardbound(x) and Barefoot(x) -> Luge(x, birgitta))\nforall x (Xxviii(x) and Broadside(x, heddie) -> Pedal(x, kip))\n\nnot Pedal(heddie, heddie)\n\nforall x (Praetorial(x) and Broadside(x, heddie) -> Pedal(x, heddie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The siana yield the casper. The siana is gristly. The siana is excitatory. The siana claver the casper. The siana claver the katlin. The casper yield the katlin. The casper is eighty. The casper besmear the siana. The casper claver the siana. The katlin is eighty. The katlin is gristly. The katlin besmear the siana. The katlin besmear the casper. The katlin claver the siana. The katlin claver the casper. If something claver the siana then it besmear the casper. If something is excitatory and it besmear the siana then it is monopteral. If something is monopteral and it claver the casper then it yield the casper. If something yield the siana and the siana is excitatory then it is excitatory. If something is gristly and excitatory then it besmear the katlin. If something is eighty and it claver the casper then it yield the siana. The casper yield the siana.", "logic": "\nYield(siana, casper)\nGristly(siana)\nExcitatory(siana)\nClaver(siana, casper)\nClaver(siana, katlin)\nYield(casper, katlin)\nEighty(casper)\nBesmear(casper, siana)\nClaver(casper, siana)\nEighty(katlin)\nGristly(katlin)\nBesmear(katlin, siana)\nBesmear(katlin, casper)\nClaver(katlin, siana)\nClaver(katlin, casper)\nforall x (Claver(x, siana) -> Besmear(x, casper))\nforall x (Excitatory(x) and Besmear(x, siana) -> Monopteral(x))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and Claver(x, casper) -> Yield(x, casper))\nforall x (Yield(x, siana) and Excitatory(siana) -> Excitatory(x))\nforall x (Gristly(x) and Excitatory(x) -> Besmear(x, katlin))\nforall x (Eighty(x) and Claver(x, casper) -> Yield(x, siana))\n\nYield(casper, siana)\n\nforall x (Eighty(x) and Claver(x, casper) -> Yield(x, siana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The gennie miscarry the addie. The gennie is sculpted. The gennie is latinate. The gennie manducate the addie. The gennie manducate the adina. The addie miscarry the adina. The addie is bowing. The addie avianize the gennie. The addie manducate the gennie. The adina is bowing. The adina is sculpted. The adina avianize the gennie. The adina avianize the addie. The adina manducate the gennie. The adina manducate the addie. If something manducate the gennie then it avianize the addie. If something is latinate and it avianize the gennie then it is asterisked. If something is asterisked and it manducate the addie then it miscarry the addie. If something miscarry the gennie and the gennie is latinate then it is latinate. If something is sculpted and latinate then it avianize the adina. If something is bowing and it manducate the addie then it miscarry the gennie. The addie does not visit the addie.", "logic": "\nMiscarry(gennie, addie)\nSculpted(gennie)\nLatinate(gennie)\nManducate(gennie, addie)\nManducate(gennie, adina)\nMiscarry(addie, adina)\nBowing(addie)\nAvianize(addie, gennie)\nManducate(addie, gennie)\nBowing(adina)\nSculpted(adina)\nAvianize(adina, gennie)\nAvianize(adina, addie)\nManducate(adina, gennie)\nManducate(adina, addie)\nforall x (Manducate(x, gennie) -> Avianize(x, addie))\nforall x (Latinate(x) and Avianize(x, gennie) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Asterisked(x) and Manducate(x, addie) -> Miscarry(x, addie))\nforall x (Miscarry(x, gennie) and Latinate(gennie) -> Latinate(x))\nforall x (Sculpted(x) and Latinate(x) -> Avianize(x, adina))\nforall x (Bowing(x) and Manducate(x, addie) -> Miscarry(x, gennie))\n\nnot Manducate(addie, addie)\n\nnot Manducate(addie, addie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The row fumigate the judi. The row is ascensive. The row is unpaired. The row claxon the judi. The row claxon the lydie. The judi fumigate the lydie. The judi is fuzzy. The judi innovate the row. The judi claxon the row. The lydie is fuzzy. The lydie is ascensive. The lydie innovate the row. The lydie innovate the judi. The lydie claxon the row. The lydie claxon the judi. If something claxon the row then it innovate the judi. If something is unpaired and it innovate the row then it is hypothetic. If something is hypothetic and it claxon the judi then it fumigate the judi. If something fumigate the row and the row is unpaired then it is unpaired. If something is ascensive and unpaired then it innovate the lydie. If something is fuzzy and it claxon the judi then it fumigate the row. The row claxon the row.", "logic": "\nFumigate(row, judi)\nAscensive(row)\nUnpaired(row)\nClaxon(row, judi)\nClaxon(row, lydie)\nFumigate(judi, lydie)\nFuzzy(judi)\nInnovate(judi, row)\nClaxon(judi, row)\nFuzzy(lydie)\nAscensive(lydie)\nInnovate(lydie, row)\nInnovate(lydie, judi)\nClaxon(lydie, row)\nClaxon(lydie, judi)\nforall x (Claxon(x, row) -> Innovate(x, judi))\nforall x (Unpaired(x) and Innovate(x, row) -> Hypothetic(x))\nforall x (Hypothetic(x) and Claxon(x, judi) -> Fumigate(x, judi))\nforall x (Fumigate(x, row) and Unpaired(row) -> Unpaired(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) and Unpaired(x) -> Innovate(x, lydie))\nforall x (Fuzzy(x) and Claxon(x, judi) -> Fumigate(x, row))\n\nClaxon(row, row)\n\nClaxon(row, row) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The elias sanitate the gunvor. The elias is lenient. The elias is toadyish. The elias overvalue the gunvor. The elias overvalue the max. The gunvor sanitate the max. The gunvor is hypnoid. The gunvor pompadour the elias. The gunvor overvalue the elias. The max is hypnoid. The max is lenient. The max pompadour the elias. The max pompadour the gunvor. The max overvalue the elias. The max overvalue the gunvor. If something overvalue the elias then it pompadour the gunvor. If something is toadyish and it pompadour the elias then it is auriculate. If something is auriculate and it overvalue the gunvor then it sanitate the gunvor. If something sanitate the elias and the elias is toadyish then it is toadyish. If something is lenient and toadyish then it pompadour the max. If something is hypnoid and it overvalue the gunvor then it sanitate the elias. The gunvor is not green.", "logic": "\nSanitate(elias, gunvor)\nLenient(elias)\nToadyish(elias)\nOvervalue(elias, gunvor)\nOvervalue(elias, max)\nSanitate(gunvor, max)\nHypnoid(gunvor)\nPompadour(gunvor, elias)\nOvervalue(gunvor, elias)\nHypnoid(max)\nLenient(max)\nPompadour(max, elias)\nPompadour(max, gunvor)\nOvervalue(max, elias)\nOvervalue(max, gunvor)\nforall x (Overvalue(x, elias) -> Pompadour(x, gunvor))\nforall x (Toadyish(x) and Pompadour(x, elias) -> Auriculate(x))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) and Overvalue(x, gunvor) -> Sanitate(x, gunvor))\nforall x (Sanitate(x, elias) and Toadyish(elias) -> Toadyish(x))\nforall x (Lenient(x) and Toadyish(x) -> Pompadour(x, max))\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Overvalue(x, gunvor) -> Sanitate(x, elias))\n\nnot Green(gunvor)\n\nnot Green(gunvor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The kellen ticket the brent. The kellen is socialized. The kellen is bloody. The kellen discover the brent. The kellen discover the reagan. The brent ticket the reagan. The brent is stooping. The brent polemize the kellen. The brent discover the kellen. The reagan is stooping. The reagan is socialized. The reagan polemize the kellen. The reagan polemize the brent. The reagan discover the kellen. The reagan discover the brent. If something discover the kellen then it polemize the brent. If something is bloody and it polemize the kellen then it is shady. If something is shady and it discover the brent then it ticket the brent. If something ticket the kellen and the kellen is bloody then it is bloody. If something is socialized and bloody then it polemize the reagan. If something is stooping and it discover the brent then it ticket the kellen. The reagan ticket the reagan.", "logic": "\nTicket(kellen, brent)\nSocialized(kellen)\nBloody(kellen)\nDiscover(kellen, brent)\nDiscover(kellen, reagan)\nTicket(brent, reagan)\nStooping(brent)\nPolemize(brent, kellen)\nDiscover(brent, kellen)\nStooping(reagan)\nSocialized(reagan)\nPolemize(reagan, kellen)\nPolemize(reagan, brent)\nDiscover(reagan, kellen)\nDiscover(reagan, brent)\nforall x (Discover(x, kellen) -> Polemize(x, brent))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and Polemize(x, kellen) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Shady(x) and Discover(x, brent) -> Ticket(x, brent))\nforall x (Ticket(x, kellen) and Bloody(kellen) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Socialized(x) and Bloody(x) -> Polemize(x, reagan))\nforall x (Stooping(x) and Discover(x, brent) -> Ticket(x, kellen))\n\nTicket(reagan, reagan)\n\nTicket(reagan, reagan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-886"} {"premises": "The lanni enjoin the alis. The lanni enjoin the lorine. The lanni breakfast the alis. The lanni is intrusive. The lanni is twin. The alis enjoin the lanni. The alis enjoin the lorine. The alis breakfast the lanni. The alis breakfast the lorine. The alis is twin. The alis apologise the lorine. The lorine enjoin the alis. The lorine does not eat the alis. The lorine is twin. The lorine is piercing. If someone enjoin the alis then they are tawdry. If someone is twin and they like the lorine then they eat the alis. If someone enjoin the lorine then the lorine breakfast the lanni. If someone enjoin the lanni and the lanni enjoin the alis then the lanni enjoin the lorine. If someone apologise the lorine and they are not intrusive then they like the lanni. If someone is tawdry and they eat the alis then they eat the lorine. If someone apologise the alis then the alis does not eat the lorine. If the lanni enjoin the alis and the lanni breakfast the lorine then the alis apologise the lanni. The alis enjoin the lorine.", "logic": "\nEnjoin(lanni, alis)\nEnjoin(lanni, lorine)\nBreakfast(lanni, alis)\nIntrusive(lanni)\nTwin(lanni)\nEnjoin(alis, lanni)\nEnjoin(alis, lorine)\nBreakfast(alis, lanni)\nBreakfast(alis, lorine)\nTwin(alis)\nApologise(alis, lorine)\nEnjoin(lorine, alis)\nnot Breakfast(lorine, alis)\nTwin(lorine)\nPiercing(lorine)\nforall x (Enjoin(x, alis) -> Tawdry(x))\nforall x (Twin(x) and Apologise(x, lorine) -> Breakfast(x, alis))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, lorine) -> Breakfast(lorine, lanni))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, lanni) and Enjoin(lanni, alis) -> Enjoin(lanni, lorine))\nforall x (Apologise(x, lorine) and not Intrusive(x) -> Apologise(x, lanni))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) and Breakfast(x, alis) -> Breakfast(x, lorine))\nforall x (Apologise(x, alis) -> not Breakfast(alis, lorine))\nEnjoin(lanni, alis) and Breakfast(lanni, lorine) -> Apologise(alis, lanni)\n\nEnjoin(alis, lorine)\n\ntherefore Enjoin(alis, lorine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The lois stroke the merv. The lois stroke the dickey. The lois contain the merv. The lois is absorbent. The lois is tattling. The merv stroke the lois. The merv stroke the dickey. The merv contain the lois. The merv contain the dickey. The merv is tattling. The merv belly the dickey. The dickey stroke the merv. The dickey does not eat the merv. The dickey is tattling. The dickey is palpable. If someone stroke the merv then they are algebraic. If someone is tattling and they like the dickey then they eat the merv. If someone stroke the dickey then the dickey contain the lois. If someone stroke the lois and the lois stroke the merv then the lois stroke the dickey. If someone belly the dickey and they are not absorbent then they like the lois. If someone is algebraic and they eat the merv then they eat the dickey. If someone belly the merv then the merv does not eat the dickey. If the lois stroke the merv and the lois contain the dickey then the merv belly the lois. The merv does not chase the lois.", "logic": "\nStroke(lois, merv)\nStroke(lois, dickey)\nContain(lois, merv)\nAbsorbent(lois)\nTattling(lois)\nStroke(merv, lois)\nStroke(merv, dickey)\nContain(merv, lois)\nContain(merv, dickey)\nTattling(merv)\nBelly(merv, dickey)\nStroke(dickey, merv)\nnot Contain(dickey, merv)\nTattling(dickey)\nPalpable(dickey)\nforall x (Stroke(x, merv) -> Algebraic(x))\nforall x (Tattling(x) and Belly(x, dickey) -> Contain(x, merv))\nforall x (Stroke(x, dickey) -> Contain(dickey, lois))\nforall x (Stroke(x, lois) and Stroke(lois, merv) -> Stroke(lois, dickey))\nforall x (Belly(x, dickey) and not Absorbent(x) -> Belly(x, lois))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) and Contain(x, merv) -> Contain(x, dickey))\nforall x (Belly(x, merv) -> not Contain(merv, dickey))\nStroke(lois, merv) and Contain(lois, dickey) -> Belly(merv, lois)\n\nnot Stroke(merv, lois)\n\ntherefore Stroke(merv, lois)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The graehme archaize the babette. The graehme archaize the roanna. The graehme asseverate the babette. The graehme is succeeding. The graehme is bilabiate. The babette archaize the graehme. The babette archaize the roanna. The babette asseverate the graehme. The babette asseverate the roanna. The babette is bilabiate. The babette splice the roanna. The roanna archaize the babette. The roanna does not eat the babette. The roanna is bilabiate. The roanna is acheronian. If someone archaize the babette then they are dirigible. If someone is bilabiate and they like the roanna then they eat the babette. If someone archaize the roanna then the roanna asseverate the graehme. If someone archaize the graehme and the graehme archaize the babette then the graehme archaize the roanna. If someone splice the roanna and they are not succeeding then they like the graehme. If someone is dirigible and they eat the babette then they eat the roanna. If someone splice the babette then the babette does not eat the roanna. If the graehme archaize the babette and the graehme asseverate the roanna then the babette splice the graehme. The roanna is dirigible.", "logic": "\nArchaize(graehme, babette)\nArchaize(graehme, roanna)\nAsseverate(graehme, babette)\nSucceeding(graehme)\nBilabiate(graehme)\nArchaize(babette, graehme)\nArchaize(babette, roanna)\nAsseverate(babette, graehme)\nAsseverate(babette, roanna)\nBilabiate(babette)\nSplice(babette, roanna)\nArchaize(roanna, babette)\nnot Asseverate(roanna, babette)\nBilabiate(roanna)\nAcheronian(roanna)\nforall x (Archaize(x, babette) -> Dirigible(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) and Splice(x, roanna) -> Asseverate(x, babette))\nforall x (Archaize(x, roanna) -> Asseverate(roanna, graehme))\nforall x (Archaize(x, graehme) and Archaize(graehme, babette) -> Archaize(graehme, roanna))\nforall x (Splice(x, roanna) and not Succeeding(x) -> Splice(x, graehme))\nforall x (Dirigible(x) and Asseverate(x, babette) -> Asseverate(x, roanna))\nforall x (Splice(x, babette) -> not Asseverate(babette, roanna))\nArchaize(graehme, babette) and Asseverate(graehme, roanna) -> Splice(babette, graehme)\n\nDirigible(roanna)\n\nArchaize(roanna, babette) and forall x (Archaize(x, babette) -> Dirigible(x)) -> therefore Dirigible(roanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The sussi recur the kellen. The sussi recur the farra. The sussi vitalise the kellen. The sussi is rife. The sussi is doglike. The kellen recur the sussi. The kellen recur the farra. The kellen vitalise the sussi. The kellen vitalise the farra. The kellen is doglike. The kellen plasticise the farra. The farra recur the kellen. The farra does not eat the kellen. The farra is doglike. The farra is insipid. If someone recur the kellen then they are hornless. If someone is doglike and they like the farra then they eat the kellen. If someone recur the farra then the farra vitalise the sussi. If someone recur the sussi and the sussi recur the kellen then the sussi recur the farra. If someone plasticise the farra and they are not rife then they like the sussi. If someone is hornless and they eat the kellen then they eat the farra. If someone plasticise the kellen then the kellen does not eat the farra. If the sussi recur the kellen and the sussi vitalise the farra then the kellen plasticise the sussi. The farra is not hornless.", "logic": "\nRecur(sussi, kellen)\nRecur(sussi, farra)\nVitalise(sussi, kellen)\nRife(sussi)\nDoglike(sussi)\nRecur(kellen, sussi)\nRecur(kellen, farra)\nVitalise(kellen, sussi)\nVitalise(kellen, farra)\nDoglike(kellen)\nPlasticise(kellen, farra)\nRecur(farra, kellen)\nnot Vitalise(farra, kellen)\nDoglike(farra)\nInsipid(farra)\nforall x (Recur(x, kellen) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Doglike(x) and Plasticise(x, farra) -> Vitalise(x, kellen))\nforall x (Recur(x, farra) -> Vitalise(farra, sussi))\nforall x (Recur(x, sussi) and Recur(sussi, kellen) -> Recur(sussi, farra))\nforall x (Plasticise(x, farra) and not Rife(x) -> Plasticise(x, sussi))\nforall x (Hornless(x) and Vitalise(x, kellen) -> Vitalise(x, farra))\nforall x (Plasticise(x, kellen) -> not Vitalise(kellen, farra))\nRecur(sussi, kellen) and Vitalise(sussi, farra) -> Plasticise(kellen, sussi)\n\nnot Hornless(farra)\n\nRecur(farra, kellen) and forall x (Recur(x, kellen) -> Hornless(x)) -> therefore Hornless(farra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The riannon brecciate the gussi. The riannon brecciate the atlanta. The riannon grow the gussi. The riannon is helpless. The riannon is automated. The gussi brecciate the riannon. The gussi brecciate the atlanta. The gussi grow the riannon. The gussi grow the atlanta. The gussi is automated. The gussi bestialize the atlanta. The atlanta brecciate the gussi. The atlanta does not eat the gussi. The atlanta is automated. The atlanta is adenoid. If someone brecciate the gussi then they are gaunt. If someone is automated and they like the atlanta then they eat the gussi. If someone brecciate the atlanta then the atlanta grow the riannon. If someone brecciate the riannon and the riannon brecciate the gussi then the riannon brecciate the atlanta. If someone bestialize the atlanta and they are not helpless then they like the riannon. If someone is gaunt and they eat the gussi then they eat the atlanta. If someone bestialize the gussi then the gussi does not eat the atlanta. If the riannon brecciate the gussi and the riannon grow the atlanta then the gussi bestialize the riannon. The riannon grow the atlanta.", "logic": "\nBrecciate(riannon, gussi)\nBrecciate(riannon, atlanta)\nGrow(riannon, gussi)\nHelpless(riannon)\nAutomated(riannon)\nBrecciate(gussi, riannon)\nBrecciate(gussi, atlanta)\nGrow(gussi, riannon)\nGrow(gussi, atlanta)\nAutomated(gussi)\nBestialize(gussi, atlanta)\nBrecciate(atlanta, gussi)\nnot Grow(atlanta, gussi)\nAutomated(atlanta)\nAdenoid(atlanta)\nforall x (Brecciate(x, gussi) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Bestialize(x, atlanta) -> Grow(x, gussi))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, atlanta) -> Grow(atlanta, riannon))\nforall x (Brecciate(x, riannon) and Brecciate(riannon, gussi) -> Brecciate(riannon, atlanta))\nforall x (Bestialize(x, atlanta) and not Helpless(x) -> Bestialize(x, riannon))\nforall x (Gaunt(x) and Grow(x, gussi) -> Grow(x, atlanta))\nforall x (Bestialize(x, gussi) -> not Grow(gussi, atlanta))\nBrecciate(riannon, gussi) and Grow(riannon, atlanta) -> Bestialize(gussi, riannon)\n\nGrow(riannon, atlanta)\n\nBrecciate(riannon, gussi) and forall x (Brecciate(x, gussi) -> Gaunt(x)) -> therefore Gaunt(riannon) Gaunt(riannon) and Grow(riannon, gussi) and forall x (Gaunt(x) and Grow(x, gussi) -> Grow(x, atlanta)) -> therefore Grow(riannon, atlanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The lydie scent the laurena. The lydie scent the ketty. The lydie rough the laurena. The lydie is deceased. The lydie is bulbar. The laurena scent the lydie. The laurena scent the ketty. The laurena rough the lydie. The laurena rough the ketty. The laurena is bulbar. The laurena chaperone the ketty. The ketty scent the laurena. The ketty does not eat the laurena. The ketty is bulbar. The ketty is alar. If someone scent the laurena then they are eurasiatic. If someone is bulbar and they like the ketty then they eat the laurena. If someone scent the ketty then the ketty rough the lydie. If someone scent the lydie and the lydie scent the laurena then the lydie scent the ketty. If someone chaperone the ketty and they are not deceased then they like the lydie. If someone is eurasiatic and they eat the laurena then they eat the ketty. If someone chaperone the laurena then the laurena does not eat the ketty. If the lydie scent the laurena and the lydie rough the ketty then the laurena chaperone the lydie. The lydie does not eat the ketty.", "logic": "\nScent(lydie, laurena)\nScent(lydie, ketty)\nRough(lydie, laurena)\nDeceased(lydie)\nBulbar(lydie)\nScent(laurena, lydie)\nScent(laurena, ketty)\nRough(laurena, lydie)\nRough(laurena, ketty)\nBulbar(laurena)\nChaperone(laurena, ketty)\nScent(ketty, laurena)\nnot Rough(ketty, laurena)\nBulbar(ketty)\nAlar(ketty)\nforall x (Scent(x, laurena) -> Eurasiatic(x))\nforall x (Bulbar(x) and Chaperone(x, ketty) -> Rough(x, laurena))\nforall x (Scent(x, ketty) -> Rough(ketty, lydie))\nforall x (Scent(x, lydie) and Scent(lydie, laurena) -> Scent(lydie, ketty))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, ketty) and not Deceased(x) -> Chaperone(x, lydie))\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) and Rough(x, laurena) -> Rough(x, ketty))\nforall x (Chaperone(x, laurena) -> not Rough(laurena, ketty))\nScent(lydie, laurena) and Rough(lydie, ketty) -> Chaperone(laurena, lydie)\n\nnot Rough(lydie, ketty)\n\nScent(lydie, laurena) and forall x (Scent(x, laurena) -> Eurasiatic(x)) -> therefore Eurasiatic(lydie) Eurasiatic(lydie) and Rough(lydie, laurena) and forall x (Eurasiatic(x) and Rough(x, laurena) -> Rough(x, ketty)) -> therefore Rough(lydie, ketty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The eustace knot the nissie. The eustace knot the letitia. The eustace doze the nissie. The eustace is perigonal. The eustace is secondhand. The nissie knot the eustace. The nissie knot the letitia. The nissie doze the eustace. The nissie doze the letitia. The nissie is secondhand. The nissie jaunt the letitia. The letitia knot the nissie. The letitia does not eat the nissie. The letitia is secondhand. The letitia is dished. If someone knot the nissie then they are ragged. If someone is secondhand and they like the letitia then they eat the nissie. If someone knot the letitia then the letitia doze the eustace. If someone knot the eustace and the eustace knot the nissie then the eustace knot the letitia. If someone jaunt the letitia and they are not perigonal then they like the eustace. If someone is ragged and they eat the nissie then they eat the letitia. If someone jaunt the nissie then the nissie does not eat the letitia. If the eustace knot the nissie and the eustace doze the letitia then the nissie jaunt the eustace. The nissie jaunt the eustace.", "logic": "\nKnot(eustace, nissie)\nKnot(eustace, letitia)\nDoze(eustace, nissie)\nPerigonal(eustace)\nSecondhand(eustace)\nKnot(nissie, eustace)\nKnot(nissie, letitia)\nDoze(nissie, eustace)\nDoze(nissie, letitia)\nSecondhand(nissie)\nJaunt(nissie, letitia)\nKnot(letitia, nissie)\nnot Doze(letitia, nissie)\nSecondhand(letitia)\nDished(letitia)\nforall x (Knot(x, nissie) -> Ragged(x))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) and Jaunt(x, letitia) -> Doze(x, nissie))\nforall x (Knot(x, letitia) -> Doze(letitia, eustace))\nforall x (Knot(x, eustace) and Knot(eustace, nissie) -> Knot(eustace, letitia))\nforall x (Jaunt(x, letitia) and not Perigonal(x) -> Jaunt(x, eustace))\nforall x (Ragged(x) and Doze(x, nissie) -> Doze(x, letitia))\nforall x (Jaunt(x, nissie) -> not Doze(nissie, letitia))\nKnot(eustace, nissie) and Doze(eustace, letitia) -> Jaunt(nissie, eustace)\n\nJaunt(nissie, eustace)\n\nKnot(eustace, nissie) and forall x (Knot(x, nissie) -> Ragged(x)) -> therefore Ragged(eustace) Ragged(eustace) and Doze(eustace, nissie) and forall x (Ragged(x) and Doze(x, nissie) -> Doze(x, letitia)) -> therefore Doze(eustace, letitia) Knot(eustace, nissie) and Doze(eustace, letitia) and Knot(eustace, nissie) and Doze(eustace, letitia) -> Jaunt(nissie, eustace) -> therefore Jaunt(nissie, eustace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The marielle smack the yelena. The marielle smack the madelina. The marielle iodise the yelena. The marielle is bicorn. The marielle is sanitized. The yelena smack the marielle. The yelena smack the madelina. The yelena iodise the marielle. The yelena iodise the madelina. The yelena is sanitized. The yelena imitate the madelina. The madelina smack the yelena. The madelina does not eat the yelena. The madelina is sanitized. The madelina is blastular. If someone smack the yelena then they are marvelous. If someone is sanitized and they like the madelina then they eat the yelena. If someone smack the madelina then the madelina iodise the marielle. If someone smack the marielle and the marielle smack the yelena then the marielle smack the madelina. If someone imitate the madelina and they are not bicorn then they like the marielle. If someone is marvelous and they eat the yelena then they eat the madelina. If someone imitate the yelena then the yelena does not eat the madelina. If the marielle smack the yelena and the marielle iodise the madelina then the yelena imitate the marielle. The yelena does not like the marielle.", "logic": "\nSmack(marielle, yelena)\nSmack(marielle, madelina)\nIodise(marielle, yelena)\nBicorn(marielle)\nSanitized(marielle)\nSmack(yelena, marielle)\nSmack(yelena, madelina)\nIodise(yelena, marielle)\nIodise(yelena, madelina)\nSanitized(yelena)\nImitate(yelena, madelina)\nSmack(madelina, yelena)\nnot Iodise(madelina, yelena)\nSanitized(madelina)\nBlastular(madelina)\nforall x (Smack(x, yelena) -> Marvelous(x))\nforall x (Sanitized(x) and Imitate(x, madelina) -> Iodise(x, yelena))\nforall x (Smack(x, madelina) -> Iodise(madelina, marielle))\nforall x (Smack(x, marielle) and Smack(marielle, yelena) -> Smack(marielle, madelina))\nforall x (Imitate(x, madelina) and not Bicorn(x) -> Imitate(x, marielle))\nforall x (Marvelous(x) and Iodise(x, yelena) -> Iodise(x, madelina))\nforall x (Imitate(x, yelena) -> not Iodise(yelena, madelina))\nSmack(marielle, yelena) and Iodise(marielle, madelina) -> Imitate(yelena, marielle)\n\nnot Imitate(yelena, marielle)\n\nSmack(marielle, yelena) and forall x (Smack(x, yelena) -> Marvelous(x)) -> therefore Marvelous(marielle) Marvelous(marielle) and Iodise(marielle, yelena) and forall x (Marvelous(x) and Iodise(x, yelena) -> Iodise(x, madelina)) -> therefore Iodise(marielle, madelina) Smack(marielle, yelena) and Iodise(marielle, madelina) and Smack(marielle, yelena) and Iodise(marielle, madelina) -> Imitate(yelena, marielle) -> therefore Imitate(yelena, marielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The rufus craunch the modesty. The rufus craunch the allyn. The rufus accumulate the modesty. The rufus is fallen. The rufus is amaurotic. The modesty craunch the rufus. The modesty craunch the allyn. The modesty accumulate the rufus. The modesty accumulate the allyn. The modesty is amaurotic. The modesty bobble the allyn. The allyn craunch the modesty. The allyn does not eat the modesty. The allyn is amaurotic. The allyn is albanian. If someone craunch the modesty then they are echoing. If someone is amaurotic and they like the allyn then they eat the modesty. If someone craunch the allyn then the allyn accumulate the rufus. If someone craunch the rufus and the rufus craunch the modesty then the rufus craunch the allyn. If someone bobble the allyn and they are not fallen then they like the rufus. If someone is echoing and they eat the modesty then they eat the allyn. If someone bobble the modesty then the modesty does not eat the allyn. If the rufus craunch the modesty and the rufus accumulate the allyn then the modesty bobble the rufus. The allyn does not eat the allyn.", "logic": "\nCraunch(rufus, modesty)\nCraunch(rufus, allyn)\nAccumulate(rufus, modesty)\nFallen(rufus)\nAmaurotic(rufus)\nCraunch(modesty, rufus)\nCraunch(modesty, allyn)\nAccumulate(modesty, rufus)\nAccumulate(modesty, allyn)\nAmaurotic(modesty)\nBobble(modesty, allyn)\nCraunch(allyn, modesty)\nnot Accumulate(allyn, modesty)\nAmaurotic(allyn)\nAlbanian(allyn)\nforall x (Craunch(x, modesty) -> Echoing(x))\nforall x (Amaurotic(x) and Bobble(x, allyn) -> Accumulate(x, modesty))\nforall x (Craunch(x, allyn) -> Accumulate(allyn, rufus))\nforall x (Craunch(x, rufus) and Craunch(rufus, modesty) -> Craunch(rufus, allyn))\nforall x (Bobble(x, allyn) and not Fallen(x) -> Bobble(x, rufus))\nforall x (Echoing(x) and Accumulate(x, modesty) -> Accumulate(x, allyn))\nforall x (Bobble(x, modesty) -> not Accumulate(modesty, allyn))\nCraunch(rufus, modesty) and Accumulate(rufus, allyn) -> Bobble(modesty, rufus)\n\nnot Accumulate(allyn, allyn)\n\nforall x (Echoing(x) and Accumulate(x, modesty) -> Accumulate(x, allyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The moe calumniate the homer. The moe calumniate the ethel. The moe saute the homer. The moe is indiscreet. The moe is scheduled. The homer calumniate the moe. The homer calumniate the ethel. The homer saute the moe. The homer saute the ethel. The homer is scheduled. The homer arborise the ethel. The ethel calumniate the homer. The ethel does not eat the homer. The ethel is scheduled. The ethel is cheeky. If someone calumniate the homer then they are twentieth. If someone is scheduled and they like the ethel then they eat the homer. If someone calumniate the ethel then the ethel saute the moe. If someone calumniate the moe and the moe calumniate the homer then the moe calumniate the ethel. If someone arborise the ethel and they are not indiscreet then they like the moe. If someone is twentieth and they eat the homer then they eat the ethel. If someone arborise the homer then the homer does not eat the ethel. If the moe calumniate the homer and the moe saute the ethel then the homer arborise the moe. The moe arborise the moe.", "logic": "\nCalumniate(moe, homer)\nCalumniate(moe, ethel)\nSaute(moe, homer)\nIndiscreet(moe)\nScheduled(moe)\nCalumniate(homer, moe)\nCalumniate(homer, ethel)\nSaute(homer, moe)\nSaute(homer, ethel)\nScheduled(homer)\nArborise(homer, ethel)\nCalumniate(ethel, homer)\nnot Saute(ethel, homer)\nScheduled(ethel)\nCheeky(ethel)\nforall x (Calumniate(x, homer) -> Twentieth(x))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) and Arborise(x, ethel) -> Saute(x, homer))\nforall x (Calumniate(x, ethel) -> Saute(ethel, moe))\nforall x (Calumniate(x, moe) and Calumniate(moe, homer) -> Calumniate(moe, ethel))\nforall x (Arborise(x, ethel) and not Indiscreet(x) -> Arborise(x, moe))\nforall x (Twentieth(x) and Saute(x, homer) -> Saute(x, ethel))\nforall x (Arborise(x, homer) -> not Saute(homer, ethel))\nCalumniate(moe, homer) and Saute(moe, ethel) -> Arborise(homer, moe)\n\nArborise(moe, moe)\n\nforall x (Arborise(x, ethel) and not Indiscreet(x) -> Arborise(x, moe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The herta devise the niccolo. The herta devise the michel. The herta oppress the niccolo. The herta is operative. The herta is muted. The niccolo devise the herta. The niccolo devise the michel. The niccolo oppress the herta. The niccolo oppress the michel. The niccolo is muted. The niccolo staunch the michel. The michel devise the niccolo. The michel does not eat the niccolo. The michel is muted. The michel is molded. If someone devise the niccolo then they are filipino. If someone is muted and they like the michel then they eat the niccolo. If someone devise the michel then the michel oppress the herta. If someone devise the herta and the herta devise the niccolo then the herta devise the michel. If someone staunch the michel and they are not operative then they like the herta. If someone is filipino and they eat the niccolo then they eat the michel. If someone staunch the niccolo then the niccolo does not eat the michel. If the herta devise the niccolo and the herta oppress the michel then the niccolo staunch the herta. The niccolo is not filipino.", "logic": "\nDevise(herta, niccolo)\nDevise(herta, michel)\nOppress(herta, niccolo)\nOperative(herta)\nMuted(herta)\nDevise(niccolo, herta)\nDevise(niccolo, michel)\nOppress(niccolo, herta)\nOppress(niccolo, michel)\nMuted(niccolo)\nStaunch(niccolo, michel)\nDevise(michel, niccolo)\nnot Oppress(michel, niccolo)\nMuted(michel)\nMolded(michel)\nforall x (Devise(x, niccolo) -> Filipino(x))\nforall x (Muted(x) and Staunch(x, michel) -> Oppress(x, niccolo))\nforall x (Devise(x, michel) -> Oppress(michel, herta))\nforall x (Devise(x, herta) and Devise(herta, niccolo) -> Devise(herta, michel))\nforall x (Staunch(x, michel) and not Operative(x) -> Staunch(x, herta))\nforall x (Filipino(x) and Oppress(x, niccolo) -> Oppress(x, michel))\nforall x (Staunch(x, niccolo) -> not Oppress(niccolo, michel))\nDevise(herta, niccolo) and Oppress(herta, michel) -> Staunch(niccolo, herta)\n\nnot Filipino(niccolo)\n\nforall x (Devise(x, niccolo) -> Filipino(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The demetria travesty the baird. The demetria travesty the franz. The demetria stint the baird. The demetria is sectional. The demetria is ferned. The baird travesty the demetria. The baird travesty the franz. The baird stint the demetria. The baird stint the franz. The baird is ferned. The baird comprehend the franz. The franz travesty the baird. The franz does not eat the baird. The franz is ferned. The franz is stingy. If someone travesty the baird then they are hellenic. If someone is ferned and they like the franz then they eat the baird. If someone travesty the franz then the franz stint the demetria. If someone travesty the demetria and the demetria travesty the baird then the demetria travesty the franz. If someone comprehend the franz and they are not sectional then they like the demetria. If someone is hellenic and they eat the baird then they eat the franz. If someone comprehend the baird then the baird does not eat the franz. If the demetria travesty the baird and the demetria stint the franz then the baird comprehend the demetria. The franz comprehend the demetria.", "logic": "\nTravesty(demetria, baird)\nTravesty(demetria, franz)\nStint(demetria, baird)\nSectional(demetria)\nFerned(demetria)\nTravesty(baird, demetria)\nTravesty(baird, franz)\nStint(baird, demetria)\nStint(baird, franz)\nFerned(baird)\nComprehend(baird, franz)\nTravesty(franz, baird)\nnot Stint(franz, baird)\nFerned(franz)\nStingy(franz)\nforall x (Travesty(x, baird) -> Hellenic(x))\nforall x (Ferned(x) and Comprehend(x, franz) -> Stint(x, baird))\nforall x (Travesty(x, franz) -> Stint(franz, demetria))\nforall x (Travesty(x, demetria) and Travesty(demetria, baird) -> Travesty(demetria, franz))\nforall x (Comprehend(x, franz) and not Sectional(x) -> Comprehend(x, demetria))\nforall x (Hellenic(x) and Stint(x, baird) -> Stint(x, franz))\nforall x (Comprehend(x, baird) -> not Stint(baird, franz))\nTravesty(demetria, baird) and Stint(demetria, franz) -> Comprehend(baird, demetria)\n\nComprehend(franz, demetria)\n\nforall x (Comprehend(x, franz) and not Sectional(x) -> Comprehend(x, demetria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The stanly poniard the tudor. The stanly poniard the suzie. The stanly record the tudor. The stanly is asthenic. The stanly is inviting. The tudor poniard the stanly. The tudor poniard the suzie. The tudor record the stanly. The tudor record the suzie. The tudor is inviting. The tudor wallop the suzie. The suzie poniard the tudor. The suzie does not eat the tudor. The suzie is inviting. The suzie is monoclonal. If someone poniard the tudor then they are insistent. If someone is inviting and they like the suzie then they eat the tudor. If someone poniard the suzie then the suzie record the stanly. If someone poniard the stanly and the stanly poniard the tudor then the stanly poniard the suzie. If someone wallop the suzie and they are not asthenic then they like the stanly. If someone is insistent and they eat the tudor then they eat the suzie. If someone wallop the tudor then the tudor does not eat the suzie. If the stanly poniard the tudor and the stanly record the suzie then the tudor wallop the stanly. The suzie does not chase the stanly.", "logic": "\nPoniard(stanly, tudor)\nPoniard(stanly, suzie)\nRecord(stanly, tudor)\nAsthenic(stanly)\nInviting(stanly)\nPoniard(tudor, stanly)\nPoniard(tudor, suzie)\nRecord(tudor, stanly)\nRecord(tudor, suzie)\nInviting(tudor)\nWallop(tudor, suzie)\nPoniard(suzie, tudor)\nnot Record(suzie, tudor)\nInviting(suzie)\nMonoclonal(suzie)\nforall x (Poniard(x, tudor) -> Insistent(x))\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Wallop(x, suzie) -> Record(x, tudor))\nforall x (Poniard(x, suzie) -> Record(suzie, stanly))\nforall x (Poniard(x, stanly) and Poniard(stanly, tudor) -> Poniard(stanly, suzie))\nforall x (Wallop(x, suzie) and not Asthenic(x) -> Wallop(x, stanly))\nforall x (Insistent(x) and Record(x, tudor) -> Record(x, suzie))\nforall x (Wallop(x, tudor) -> not Record(tudor, suzie))\nPoniard(stanly, tudor) and Record(stanly, suzie) -> Wallop(tudor, stanly)\n\nnot Poniard(suzie, stanly)\n\nnot Poniard(suzie, stanly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The tomasine heist the inesita. The tomasine heist the letitia. The tomasine treble the inesita. The tomasine is rhythmic. The tomasine is anasarcous. The inesita heist the tomasine. The inesita heist the letitia. The inesita treble the tomasine. The inesita treble the letitia. The inesita is anasarcous. The inesita oxygenize the letitia. The letitia heist the inesita. The letitia does not eat the inesita. The letitia is anasarcous. The letitia is peruked. If someone heist the inesita then they are equable. If someone is anasarcous and they like the letitia then they eat the inesita. If someone heist the letitia then the letitia treble the tomasine. If someone heist the tomasine and the tomasine heist the inesita then the tomasine heist the letitia. If someone oxygenize the letitia and they are not rhythmic then they like the tomasine. If someone is equable and they eat the inesita then they eat the letitia. If someone oxygenize the inesita then the inesita does not eat the letitia. If the tomasine heist the inesita and the tomasine treble the letitia then the inesita oxygenize the tomasine. The tomasine treble the tomasine.", "logic": "\nHeist(tomasine, inesita)\nHeist(tomasine, letitia)\nTreble(tomasine, inesita)\nRhythmic(tomasine)\nAnasarcous(tomasine)\nHeist(inesita, tomasine)\nHeist(inesita, letitia)\nTreble(inesita, tomasine)\nTreble(inesita, letitia)\nAnasarcous(inesita)\nOxygenize(inesita, letitia)\nHeist(letitia, inesita)\nnot Treble(letitia, inesita)\nAnasarcous(letitia)\nPeruked(letitia)\nforall x (Heist(x, inesita) -> Equable(x))\nforall x (Anasarcous(x) and Oxygenize(x, letitia) -> Treble(x, inesita))\nforall x (Heist(x, letitia) -> Treble(letitia, tomasine))\nforall x (Heist(x, tomasine) and Heist(tomasine, inesita) -> Heist(tomasine, letitia))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, letitia) and not Rhythmic(x) -> Oxygenize(x, tomasine))\nforall x (Equable(x) and Treble(x, inesita) -> Treble(x, letitia))\nforall x (Oxygenize(x, inesita) -> not Treble(inesita, letitia))\nHeist(tomasine, inesita) and Treble(tomasine, letitia) -> Oxygenize(inesita, tomasine)\n\nTreble(tomasine, tomasine)\n\nTreble(tomasine, tomasine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The eula polemize the vickie. The eula polemize the bessy. The eula escalade the vickie. The eula is florentine. The eula is octuple. The vickie polemize the eula. The vickie polemize the bessy. The vickie escalade the eula. The vickie escalade the bessy. The vickie is octuple. The vickie question the bessy. The bessy polemize the vickie. The bessy does not eat the vickie. The bessy is octuple. The bessy is melting. If someone polemize the vickie then they are completed. If someone is octuple and they like the bessy then they eat the vickie. If someone polemize the bessy then the bessy escalade the eula. If someone polemize the eula and the eula polemize the vickie then the eula polemize the bessy. If someone question the bessy and they are not florentine then they like the eula. If someone is completed and they eat the vickie then they eat the bessy. If someone question the vickie then the vickie does not eat the bessy. If the eula polemize the vickie and the eula escalade the bessy then the vickie question the eula. The vickie is not melting.", "logic": "\nPolemize(eula, vickie)\nPolemize(eula, bessy)\nEscalade(eula, vickie)\nFlorentine(eula)\nOctuple(eula)\nPolemize(vickie, eula)\nPolemize(vickie, bessy)\nEscalade(vickie, eula)\nEscalade(vickie, bessy)\nOctuple(vickie)\nQuestion(vickie, bessy)\nPolemize(bessy, vickie)\nnot Escalade(bessy, vickie)\nOctuple(bessy)\nMelting(bessy)\nforall x (Polemize(x, vickie) -> Completed(x))\nforall x (Octuple(x) and Question(x, bessy) -> Escalade(x, vickie))\nforall x (Polemize(x, bessy) -> Escalade(bessy, eula))\nforall x (Polemize(x, eula) and Polemize(eula, vickie) -> Polemize(eula, bessy))\nforall x (Question(x, bessy) and not Florentine(x) -> Question(x, eula))\nforall x (Completed(x) and Escalade(x, vickie) -> Escalade(x, bessy))\nforall x (Question(x, vickie) -> not Escalade(vickie, bessy))\nPolemize(eula, vickie) and Escalade(eula, bessy) -> Question(vickie, eula)\n\nnot Melting(vickie)\n\nnot Melting(vickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The clarisa reopen the linda. The clarisa reopen the kelvin. The clarisa shrivel the linda. The clarisa is silky. The clarisa is center. The linda reopen the clarisa. The linda reopen the kelvin. The linda shrivel the clarisa. The linda shrivel the kelvin. The linda is center. The linda repay the kelvin. The kelvin reopen the linda. The kelvin does not eat the linda. The kelvin is center. The kelvin is voluble. If someone reopen the linda then they are telltale. If someone is center and they like the kelvin then they eat the linda. If someone reopen the kelvin then the kelvin shrivel the clarisa. If someone reopen the clarisa and the clarisa reopen the linda then the clarisa reopen the kelvin. If someone repay the kelvin and they are not silky then they like the clarisa. If someone is telltale and they eat the linda then they eat the kelvin. If someone repay the linda then the linda does not eat the kelvin. If the clarisa reopen the linda and the clarisa shrivel the kelvin then the linda repay the clarisa. The kelvin is cold.", "logic": "\nReopen(clarisa, linda)\nReopen(clarisa, kelvin)\nShrivel(clarisa, linda)\nSilky(clarisa)\nCenter(clarisa)\nReopen(linda, clarisa)\nReopen(linda, kelvin)\nShrivel(linda, clarisa)\nShrivel(linda, kelvin)\nCenter(linda)\nRepay(linda, kelvin)\nReopen(kelvin, linda)\nnot Shrivel(kelvin, linda)\nCenter(kelvin)\nVoluble(kelvin)\nforall x (Reopen(x, linda) -> Telltale(x))\nforall x (Center(x) and Repay(x, kelvin) -> Shrivel(x, linda))\nforall x (Reopen(x, kelvin) -> Shrivel(kelvin, clarisa))\nforall x (Reopen(x, clarisa) and Reopen(clarisa, linda) -> Reopen(clarisa, kelvin))\nforall x (Repay(x, kelvin) and not Silky(x) -> Repay(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Telltale(x) and Shrivel(x, linda) -> Shrivel(x, kelvin))\nforall x (Repay(x, linda) -> not Shrivel(linda, kelvin))\nReopen(clarisa, linda) and Shrivel(clarisa, kelvin) -> Repay(linda, clarisa)\n\nCold(kelvin)\n\nCold(kelvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-415"} {"premises": "The clovis does not chase the iggie. The clovis is assisted. The clovis is jainist. The clovis faint the iggie. The clovis faint the hiro. The clovis bestrew the hiro. The iggie purpose the clovis. The iggie is xxxviii. The iggie does not like the clovis. The hiro is razorback. The hiro is assisted. The hiro is primed. The hiro faint the clovis. The hiro faint the iggie. The hiro bestrew the clovis. The hiro bestrew the iggie. If someone purpose the clovis then they see the hiro. If someone purpose the hiro and the hiro faint the clovis then the clovis does not see the iggie. If someone faint the hiro and they are xxxviii then the hiro bestrew the iggie. If someone faint the hiro and they are xxxviii then they chase the hiro. If someone faint the iggie and the iggie bestrew the hiro then the iggie purpose the hiro. If the iggie purpose the clovis then the clovis is assisted. If someone faint the iggie and they see the hiro then the hiro purpose the iggie. If someone purpose the hiro and they chase the clovis then the hiro is not jainist. The clovis is assisted.", "logic": "\nnot Purpose(clovis, iggie)\nAssisted(clovis)\nJainist(clovis)\nFaint(clovis, iggie)\nFaint(clovis, hiro)\nBestrew(clovis, hiro)\nPurpose(iggie, clovis)\nXxxviii(iggie)\nnot Faint(iggie, clovis)\nRazorback(hiro)\nAssisted(hiro)\nPrimed(hiro)\nFaint(hiro, clovis)\nFaint(hiro, iggie)\nBestrew(hiro, clovis)\nBestrew(hiro, iggie)\nforall x (Purpose(x, clovis) -> Bestrew(x, hiro))\nforall x (Purpose(x, hiro) and Faint(hiro, clovis) -> not Bestrew(clovis, iggie))\nforall x (Faint(x, hiro) and Xxxviii(x) -> Bestrew(hiro, iggie))\nforall x (Faint(x, hiro) and Xxxviii(x) -> Purpose(x, hiro))\nforall x (Faint(x, iggie) and Bestrew(iggie, hiro) -> Purpose(iggie, hiro))\nPurpose(iggie, clovis) -> Assisted(clovis)\nforall x (Faint(x, iggie) and Bestrew(x, hiro) -> Purpose(hiro, iggie))\nforall x (Purpose(x, hiro) and Purpose(x, clovis) -> not Jainist(hiro))\n\nAssisted(clovis)\n\ntherefore Assisted(clovis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The christian does not chase the randal. The christian is third. The christian is roundabout. The christian introvert the randal. The christian introvert the allyce. The christian aggregate the allyce. The randal pluralize the christian. The randal is passive. The randal does not like the christian. The allyce is undeniable. The allyce is third. The allyce is slowgoing. The allyce introvert the christian. The allyce introvert the randal. The allyce aggregate the christian. The allyce aggregate the randal. If someone pluralize the christian then they see the allyce. If someone pluralize the allyce and the allyce introvert the christian then the christian does not see the randal. If someone introvert the allyce and they are passive then the allyce aggregate the randal. If someone introvert the allyce and they are passive then they chase the allyce. If someone introvert the randal and the randal aggregate the allyce then the randal pluralize the allyce. If the randal pluralize the christian then the christian is third. If someone introvert the randal and they see the allyce then the allyce pluralize the randal. If someone pluralize the allyce and they chase the christian then the allyce is not roundabout. The allyce is not third.", "logic": "\nnot Pluralize(christian, randal)\nThird(christian)\nRoundabout(christian)\nIntrovert(christian, randal)\nIntrovert(christian, allyce)\nAggregate(christian, allyce)\nPluralize(randal, christian)\nPassive(randal)\nnot Introvert(randal, christian)\nUndeniable(allyce)\nThird(allyce)\nSlowgoing(allyce)\nIntrovert(allyce, christian)\nIntrovert(allyce, randal)\nAggregate(allyce, christian)\nAggregate(allyce, randal)\nforall x (Pluralize(x, christian) -> Aggregate(x, allyce))\nforall x (Pluralize(x, allyce) and Introvert(allyce, christian) -> not Aggregate(christian, randal))\nforall x (Introvert(x, allyce) and Passive(x) -> Aggregate(allyce, randal))\nforall x (Introvert(x, allyce) and Passive(x) -> Pluralize(x, allyce))\nforall x (Introvert(x, randal) and Aggregate(randal, allyce) -> Pluralize(randal, allyce))\nPluralize(randal, christian) -> Third(christian)\nforall x (Introvert(x, randal) and Aggregate(x, allyce) -> Pluralize(allyce, randal))\nforall x (Pluralize(x, allyce) and Pluralize(x, christian) -> not Roundabout(allyce))\n\nnot Third(allyce)\n\ntherefore Third(allyce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The sam does not chase the lorri. The sam is podgy. The sam is charming. The sam batfowl the lorri. The sam batfowl the kenyon. The sam word the kenyon. The lorri expense the sam. The lorri is overnight. The lorri does not like the sam. The kenyon is bracing. The kenyon is podgy. The kenyon is springlike. The kenyon batfowl the sam. The kenyon batfowl the lorri. The kenyon word the sam. The kenyon word the lorri. If someone expense the sam then they see the kenyon. If someone expense the kenyon and the kenyon batfowl the sam then the sam does not see the lorri. If someone batfowl the kenyon and they are overnight then the kenyon word the lorri. If someone batfowl the kenyon and they are overnight then they chase the kenyon. If someone batfowl the lorri and the lorri word the kenyon then the lorri expense the kenyon. If the lorri expense the sam then the sam is podgy. If someone batfowl the lorri and they see the kenyon then the kenyon expense the lorri. If someone expense the kenyon and they chase the sam then the kenyon is not charming. The lorri word the kenyon.", "logic": "\nnot Expense(sam, lorri)\nPodgy(sam)\nCharming(sam)\nBatfowl(sam, lorri)\nBatfowl(sam, kenyon)\nWord(sam, kenyon)\nExpense(lorri, sam)\nOvernight(lorri)\nnot Batfowl(lorri, sam)\nBracing(kenyon)\nPodgy(kenyon)\nSpringlike(kenyon)\nBatfowl(kenyon, sam)\nBatfowl(kenyon, lorri)\nWord(kenyon, sam)\nWord(kenyon, lorri)\nforall x (Expense(x, sam) -> Word(x, kenyon))\nforall x (Expense(x, kenyon) and Batfowl(kenyon, sam) -> not Word(sam, lorri))\nforall x (Batfowl(x, kenyon) and Overnight(x) -> Word(kenyon, lorri))\nforall x (Batfowl(x, kenyon) and Overnight(x) -> Expense(x, kenyon))\nforall x (Batfowl(x, lorri) and Word(lorri, kenyon) -> Expense(lorri, kenyon))\nExpense(lorri, sam) -> Podgy(sam)\nforall x (Batfowl(x, lorri) and Word(x, kenyon) -> Expense(kenyon, lorri))\nforall x (Expense(x, kenyon) and Expense(x, sam) -> not Charming(kenyon))\n\nWord(lorri, kenyon)\n\nExpense(lorri, sam) and forall x (Expense(x, sam) -> Word(x, kenyon)) -> therefore Word(lorri, kenyon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The zebulon does not chase the woodie. The zebulon is inadequate. The zebulon is dietetical. The zebulon limp the woodie. The zebulon limp the ingemar. The zebulon suffocate the ingemar. The woodie corn the zebulon. The woodie is ghastly. The woodie does not like the zebulon. The ingemar is unfixed. The ingemar is inadequate. The ingemar is tabular. The ingemar limp the zebulon. The ingemar limp the woodie. The ingemar suffocate the zebulon. The ingemar suffocate the woodie. If someone corn the zebulon then they see the ingemar. If someone corn the ingemar and the ingemar limp the zebulon then the zebulon does not see the woodie. If someone limp the ingemar and they are ghastly then the ingemar suffocate the woodie. If someone limp the ingemar and they are ghastly then they chase the ingemar. If someone limp the woodie and the woodie suffocate the ingemar then the woodie corn the ingemar. If the woodie corn the zebulon then the zebulon is inadequate. If someone limp the woodie and they see the ingemar then the ingemar corn the woodie. If someone corn the ingemar and they chase the zebulon then the ingemar is not dietetical. The woodie does not see the ingemar.", "logic": "\nnot Corn(zebulon, woodie)\nInadequate(zebulon)\nDietetical(zebulon)\nLimp(zebulon, woodie)\nLimp(zebulon, ingemar)\nSuffocate(zebulon, ingemar)\nCorn(woodie, zebulon)\nGhastly(woodie)\nnot Limp(woodie, zebulon)\nUnfixed(ingemar)\nInadequate(ingemar)\nTabular(ingemar)\nLimp(ingemar, zebulon)\nLimp(ingemar, woodie)\nSuffocate(ingemar, zebulon)\nSuffocate(ingemar, woodie)\nforall x (Corn(x, zebulon) -> Suffocate(x, ingemar))\nforall x (Corn(x, ingemar) and Limp(ingemar, zebulon) -> not Suffocate(zebulon, woodie))\nforall x (Limp(x, ingemar) and Ghastly(x) -> Suffocate(ingemar, woodie))\nforall x (Limp(x, ingemar) and Ghastly(x) -> Corn(x, ingemar))\nforall x (Limp(x, woodie) and Suffocate(woodie, ingemar) -> Corn(woodie, ingemar))\nCorn(woodie, zebulon) -> Inadequate(zebulon)\nforall x (Limp(x, woodie) and Suffocate(x, ingemar) -> Corn(ingemar, woodie))\nforall x (Corn(x, ingemar) and Corn(x, zebulon) -> not Dietetical(ingemar))\n\nnot Suffocate(woodie, ingemar)\n\nCorn(woodie, zebulon) and forall x (Corn(x, zebulon) -> Suffocate(x, ingemar)) -> therefore Suffocate(woodie, ingemar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The dirk does not chase the corri. The dirk is unfriendly. The dirk is eristical. The dirk stock the corri. The dirk stock the wilona. The dirk frame the wilona. The corri hyphen the dirk. The corri is adaptive. The corri does not like the dirk. The wilona is spellbound. The wilona is unfriendly. The wilona is squishy. The wilona stock the dirk. The wilona stock the corri. The wilona frame the dirk. The wilona frame the corri. If someone hyphen the dirk then they see the wilona. If someone hyphen the wilona and the wilona stock the dirk then the dirk does not see the corri. If someone stock the wilona and they are adaptive then the wilona frame the corri. If someone stock the wilona and they are adaptive then they chase the wilona. If someone stock the corri and the corri frame the wilona then the corri hyphen the wilona. If the corri hyphen the dirk then the dirk is unfriendly. If someone stock the corri and they see the wilona then the wilona hyphen the corri. If someone hyphen the wilona and they chase the dirk then the wilona is not eristical. The corri hyphen the wilona.", "logic": "\nnot Hyphen(dirk, corri)\nUnfriendly(dirk)\nEristical(dirk)\nStock(dirk, corri)\nStock(dirk, wilona)\nFrame(dirk, wilona)\nHyphen(corri, dirk)\nAdaptive(corri)\nnot Stock(corri, dirk)\nSpellbound(wilona)\nUnfriendly(wilona)\nSquishy(wilona)\nStock(wilona, dirk)\nStock(wilona, corri)\nFrame(wilona, dirk)\nFrame(wilona, corri)\nforall x (Hyphen(x, dirk) -> Frame(x, wilona))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, wilona) and Stock(wilona, dirk) -> not Frame(dirk, corri))\nforall x (Stock(x, wilona) and Adaptive(x) -> Frame(wilona, corri))\nforall x (Stock(x, wilona) and Adaptive(x) -> Hyphen(x, wilona))\nforall x (Stock(x, corri) and Frame(corri, wilona) -> Hyphen(corri, wilona))\nHyphen(corri, dirk) -> Unfriendly(dirk)\nforall x (Stock(x, corri) and Frame(x, wilona) -> Hyphen(wilona, corri))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, wilona) and Hyphen(x, dirk) -> not Eristical(wilona))\n\nHyphen(corri, wilona)\n\nHyphen(corri, dirk) and forall x (Hyphen(x, dirk) -> Frame(x, wilona)) -> therefore Frame(corri, wilona) Stock(wilona, corri) and Frame(corri, wilona) and forall x (Stock(x, corri) and Frame(corri, wilona) -> Hyphen(corri, wilona)) -> therefore Hyphen(corri, wilona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The claudina does not chase the luise. The claudina is gasified. The claudina is satiate. The claudina purchase the luise. The claudina purchase the dudley. The claudina derate the dudley. The luise implore the claudina. The luise is rouged. The luise does not like the claudina. The dudley is eyed. The dudley is gasified. The dudley is taped. The dudley purchase the claudina. The dudley purchase the luise. The dudley derate the claudina. The dudley derate the luise. If someone implore the claudina then they see the dudley. If someone implore the dudley and the dudley purchase the claudina then the claudina does not see the luise. If someone purchase the dudley and they are rouged then the dudley derate the luise. If someone purchase the dudley and they are rouged then they chase the dudley. If someone purchase the luise and the luise derate the dudley then the luise implore the dudley. If the luise implore the claudina then the claudina is gasified. If someone purchase the luise and they see the dudley then the dudley implore the luise. If someone implore the dudley and they chase the claudina then the dudley is not satiate. The luise does not chase the dudley.", "logic": "\nnot Implore(claudina, luise)\nGasified(claudina)\nSatiate(claudina)\nPurchase(claudina, luise)\nPurchase(claudina, dudley)\nDerate(claudina, dudley)\nImplore(luise, claudina)\nRouged(luise)\nnot Purchase(luise, claudina)\nEyed(dudley)\nGasified(dudley)\nTaped(dudley)\nPurchase(dudley, claudina)\nPurchase(dudley, luise)\nDerate(dudley, claudina)\nDerate(dudley, luise)\nforall x (Implore(x, claudina) -> Derate(x, dudley))\nforall x (Implore(x, dudley) and Purchase(dudley, claudina) -> not Derate(claudina, luise))\nforall x (Purchase(x, dudley) and Rouged(x) -> Derate(dudley, luise))\nforall x (Purchase(x, dudley) and Rouged(x) -> Implore(x, dudley))\nforall x (Purchase(x, luise) and Derate(luise, dudley) -> Implore(luise, dudley))\nImplore(luise, claudina) -> Gasified(claudina)\nforall x (Purchase(x, luise) and Derate(x, dudley) -> Implore(dudley, luise))\nforall x (Implore(x, dudley) and Implore(x, claudina) -> not Satiate(dudley))\n\nnot Implore(luise, dudley)\n\nImplore(luise, claudina) and forall x (Implore(x, claudina) -> Derate(x, dudley)) -> therefore Derate(luise, dudley) Purchase(dudley, luise) and Derate(luise, dudley) and forall x (Purchase(x, luise) and Derate(luise, dudley) -> Implore(luise, dudley)) -> therefore Implore(luise, dudley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The waldo does not chase the selia. The waldo is lebanese. The waldo is assigned. The waldo resew the selia. The waldo resew the sully. The waldo platinize the sully. The selia envenom the waldo. The selia is nurturant. The selia does not like the waldo. The sully is prakritic. The sully is lebanese. The sully is delineated. The sully resew the waldo. The sully resew the selia. The sully platinize the waldo. The sully platinize the selia. If someone envenom the waldo then they see the sully. If someone envenom the sully and the sully resew the waldo then the waldo does not see the selia. If someone resew the sully and they are nurturant then the sully platinize the selia. If someone resew the sully and they are nurturant then they chase the sully. If someone resew the selia and the selia platinize the sully then the selia envenom the sully. If the selia envenom the waldo then the waldo is lebanese. If someone resew the selia and they see the sully then the sully envenom the selia. If someone envenom the sully and they chase the waldo then the sully is not assigned. The waldo does not see the selia.", "logic": "\nnot Envenom(waldo, selia)\nLebanese(waldo)\nAssigned(waldo)\nResew(waldo, selia)\nResew(waldo, sully)\nPlatinize(waldo, sully)\nEnvenom(selia, waldo)\nNurturant(selia)\nnot Resew(selia, waldo)\nPrakritic(sully)\nLebanese(sully)\nDelineated(sully)\nResew(sully, waldo)\nResew(sully, selia)\nPlatinize(sully, waldo)\nPlatinize(sully, selia)\nforall x (Envenom(x, waldo) -> Platinize(x, sully))\nforall x (Envenom(x, sully) and Resew(sully, waldo) -> not Platinize(waldo, selia))\nforall x (Resew(x, sully) and Nurturant(x) -> Platinize(sully, selia))\nforall x (Resew(x, sully) and Nurturant(x) -> Envenom(x, sully))\nforall x (Resew(x, selia) and Platinize(selia, sully) -> Envenom(selia, sully))\nEnvenom(selia, waldo) -> Lebanese(waldo)\nforall x (Resew(x, selia) and Platinize(x, sully) -> Envenom(sully, selia))\nforall x (Envenom(x, sully) and Envenom(x, waldo) -> not Assigned(sully))\n\nnot Platinize(waldo, selia)\n\nEnvenom(selia, waldo) and forall x (Envenom(x, waldo) -> Platinize(x, sully)) -> therefore Platinize(selia, sully) Resew(sully, selia) and Platinize(selia, sully) and forall x (Resew(x, selia) and Platinize(selia, sully) -> Envenom(selia, sully)) -> therefore Envenom(selia, sully) Envenom(selia, sully) and Resew(sully, waldo) and forall x (Envenom(x, sully) and Resew(sully, waldo) -> not Platinize(waldo, selia)) -> therefore not Platinize(waldo, selia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The janus does not chase the aile. The janus is vibratory. The janus is drumhead. The janus hail the aile. The janus hail the armando. The janus indite the armando. The aile rasterize the janus. The aile is sulcate. The aile does not like the janus. The armando is cislunar. The armando is vibratory. The armando is metastable. The armando hail the janus. The armando hail the aile. The armando indite the janus. The armando indite the aile. If someone rasterize the janus then they see the armando. If someone rasterize the armando and the armando hail the janus then the janus does not see the aile. If someone hail the armando and they are sulcate then the armando indite the aile. If someone hail the armando and they are sulcate then they chase the armando. If someone hail the aile and the aile indite the armando then the aile rasterize the armando. If the aile rasterize the janus then the janus is vibratory. If someone hail the aile and they see the armando then the armando rasterize the aile. If someone rasterize the armando and they chase the janus then the armando is not drumhead. The armando is drumhead.", "logic": "\nnot Rasterize(janus, aile)\nVibratory(janus)\nDrumhead(janus)\nHail(janus, aile)\nHail(janus, armando)\nIndite(janus, armando)\nRasterize(aile, janus)\nSulcate(aile)\nnot Hail(aile, janus)\nCislunar(armando)\nVibratory(armando)\nMetastable(armando)\nHail(armando, janus)\nHail(armando, aile)\nIndite(armando, janus)\nIndite(armando, aile)\nforall x (Rasterize(x, janus) -> Indite(x, armando))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, armando) and Hail(armando, janus) -> not Indite(janus, aile))\nforall x (Hail(x, armando) and Sulcate(x) -> Indite(armando, aile))\nforall x (Hail(x, armando) and Sulcate(x) -> Rasterize(x, armando))\nforall x (Hail(x, aile) and Indite(aile, armando) -> Rasterize(aile, armando))\nRasterize(aile, janus) -> Vibratory(janus)\nforall x (Hail(x, aile) and Indite(x, armando) -> Rasterize(armando, aile))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, armando) and Rasterize(x, janus) -> not Drumhead(armando))\n\nDrumhead(armando)\n\nRasterize(aile, janus) and forall x (Rasterize(x, janus) -> Indite(x, armando)) -> therefore Indite(aile, armando) Hail(armando, aile) and Indite(aile, armando) and forall x (Hail(x, aile) and Indite(aile, armando) -> Rasterize(aile, armando)) -> therefore Rasterize(aile, armando) Rasterize(aile, armando) and Rasterize(aile, janus) and forall x (Rasterize(x, armando) and Rasterize(x, janus) -> not Drumhead(armando)) -> therefore not Drumhead(armando)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The retha does not chase the ferinand. The retha is islamic. The retha is autophytic. The retha flop the ferinand. The retha flop the audry. The retha disavow the audry. The ferinand legalize the retha. The ferinand is vernal. The ferinand does not like the retha. The audry is blamable. The audry is islamic. The audry is insolvable. The audry flop the retha. The audry flop the ferinand. The audry disavow the retha. The audry disavow the ferinand. If someone legalize the retha then they see the audry. If someone legalize the audry and the audry flop the retha then the retha does not see the ferinand. If someone flop the audry and they are vernal then the audry disavow the ferinand. If someone flop the audry and they are vernal then they chase the audry. If someone flop the ferinand and the ferinand disavow the audry then the ferinand legalize the audry. If the ferinand legalize the retha then the retha is islamic. If someone flop the ferinand and they see the audry then the audry legalize the ferinand. If someone legalize the audry and they chase the retha then the audry is not autophytic. The retha does not chase the audry.", "logic": "\nnot Legalize(retha, ferinand)\nIslamic(retha)\nAutophytic(retha)\nFlop(retha, ferinand)\nFlop(retha, audry)\nDisavow(retha, audry)\nLegalize(ferinand, retha)\nVernal(ferinand)\nnot Flop(ferinand, retha)\nBlamable(audry)\nIslamic(audry)\nInsolvable(audry)\nFlop(audry, retha)\nFlop(audry, ferinand)\nDisavow(audry, retha)\nDisavow(audry, ferinand)\nforall x (Legalize(x, retha) -> Disavow(x, audry))\nforall x (Legalize(x, audry) and Flop(audry, retha) -> not Disavow(retha, ferinand))\nforall x (Flop(x, audry) and Vernal(x) -> Disavow(audry, ferinand))\nforall x (Flop(x, audry) and Vernal(x) -> Legalize(x, audry))\nforall x (Flop(x, ferinand) and Disavow(ferinand, audry) -> Legalize(ferinand, audry))\nLegalize(ferinand, retha) -> Islamic(retha)\nforall x (Flop(x, ferinand) and Disavow(x, audry) -> Legalize(audry, ferinand))\nforall x (Legalize(x, audry) and Legalize(x, retha) -> not Autophytic(audry))\n\nnot Legalize(retha, audry)\n\nforall x (Flop(x, audry) and Vernal(x) -> Legalize(x, audry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The carmelle does not chase the melody. The carmelle is besieged. The carmelle is corvine. The carmelle frolic the melody. The carmelle frolic the madelin. The carmelle obey the madelin. The melody permit the carmelle. The melody is bacterial. The melody does not like the carmelle. The madelin is lxviii. The madelin is besieged. The madelin is fine. The madelin frolic the carmelle. The madelin frolic the melody. The madelin obey the carmelle. The madelin obey the melody. If someone permit the carmelle then they see the madelin. If someone permit the madelin and the madelin frolic the carmelle then the carmelle does not see the melody. If someone frolic the madelin and they are bacterial then the madelin obey the melody. If someone frolic the madelin and they are bacterial then they chase the madelin. If someone frolic the melody and the melody obey the madelin then the melody permit the madelin. If the melody permit the carmelle then the carmelle is besieged. If someone frolic the melody and they see the madelin then the madelin permit the melody. If someone permit the madelin and they chase the carmelle then the madelin is not corvine. The madelin obey the madelin.", "logic": "\nnot Permit(carmelle, melody)\nBesieged(carmelle)\nCorvine(carmelle)\nFrolic(carmelle, melody)\nFrolic(carmelle, madelin)\nObey(carmelle, madelin)\nPermit(melody, carmelle)\nBacterial(melody)\nnot Frolic(melody, carmelle)\nLxviii(madelin)\nBesieged(madelin)\nFine(madelin)\nFrolic(madelin, carmelle)\nFrolic(madelin, melody)\nObey(madelin, carmelle)\nObey(madelin, melody)\nforall x (Permit(x, carmelle) -> Obey(x, madelin))\nforall x (Permit(x, madelin) and Frolic(madelin, carmelle) -> not Obey(carmelle, melody))\nforall x (Frolic(x, madelin) and Bacterial(x) -> Obey(madelin, melody))\nforall x (Frolic(x, madelin) and Bacterial(x) -> Permit(x, madelin))\nforall x (Frolic(x, melody) and Obey(melody, madelin) -> Permit(melody, madelin))\nPermit(melody, carmelle) -> Besieged(carmelle)\nforall x (Frolic(x, melody) and Obey(x, madelin) -> Permit(madelin, melody))\nforall x (Permit(x, madelin) and Permit(x, carmelle) -> not Corvine(madelin))\n\nObey(madelin, madelin)\n\nforall x (Permit(x, carmelle) -> Obey(x, madelin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The alvina does not chase the dorthy. The alvina is loved. The alvina is hindu. The alvina rase the dorthy. The alvina rase the vivie. The alvina rosin the vivie. The dorthy sober the alvina. The dorthy is avertible. The dorthy does not like the alvina. The vivie is ramshackle. The vivie is loved. The vivie is jaundiced. The vivie rase the alvina. The vivie rase the dorthy. The vivie rosin the alvina. The vivie rosin the dorthy. If someone sober the alvina then they see the vivie. If someone sober the vivie and the vivie rase the alvina then the alvina does not see the dorthy. If someone rase the vivie and they are avertible then the vivie rosin the dorthy. If someone rase the vivie and they are avertible then they chase the vivie. If someone rase the dorthy and the dorthy rosin the vivie then the dorthy sober the vivie. If the dorthy sober the alvina then the alvina is loved. If someone rase the dorthy and they see the vivie then the vivie sober the dorthy. If someone sober the vivie and they chase the alvina then the vivie is not hindu. The vivie does not chase the vivie.", "logic": "\nnot Sober(alvina, dorthy)\nLoved(alvina)\nHindu(alvina)\nRase(alvina, dorthy)\nRase(alvina, vivie)\nRosin(alvina, vivie)\nSober(dorthy, alvina)\nAvertible(dorthy)\nnot Rase(dorthy, alvina)\nRamshackle(vivie)\nLoved(vivie)\nJaundiced(vivie)\nRase(vivie, alvina)\nRase(vivie, dorthy)\nRosin(vivie, alvina)\nRosin(vivie, dorthy)\nforall x (Sober(x, alvina) -> Rosin(x, vivie))\nforall x (Sober(x, vivie) and Rase(vivie, alvina) -> not Rosin(alvina, dorthy))\nforall x (Rase(x, vivie) and Avertible(x) -> Rosin(vivie, dorthy))\nforall x (Rase(x, vivie) and Avertible(x) -> Sober(x, vivie))\nforall x (Rase(x, dorthy) and Rosin(dorthy, vivie) -> Sober(dorthy, vivie))\nSober(dorthy, alvina) -> Loved(alvina)\nforall x (Rase(x, dorthy) and Rosin(x, vivie) -> Sober(vivie, dorthy))\nforall x (Sober(x, vivie) and Sober(x, alvina) -> not Hindu(vivie))\n\nnot Sober(vivie, vivie)\n\nforall x (Rase(x, vivie) and Avertible(x) -> Sober(x, vivie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The annalise does not chase the mitchel. The annalise is public. The annalise is untrodden. The annalise cheese the mitchel. The annalise cheese the karmen. The annalise suppress the karmen. The mitchel quantize the annalise. The mitchel is magyar. The mitchel does not like the annalise. The karmen is innate. The karmen is public. The karmen is intramural. The karmen cheese the annalise. The karmen cheese the mitchel. The karmen suppress the annalise. The karmen suppress the mitchel. If someone quantize the annalise then they see the karmen. If someone quantize the karmen and the karmen cheese the annalise then the annalise does not see the mitchel. If someone cheese the karmen and they are magyar then the karmen suppress the mitchel. If someone cheese the karmen and they are magyar then they chase the karmen. If someone cheese the mitchel and the mitchel suppress the karmen then the mitchel quantize the karmen. If the mitchel quantize the annalise then the annalise is public. If someone cheese the mitchel and they see the karmen then the karmen quantize the mitchel. If someone quantize the karmen and they chase the annalise then the karmen is not untrodden. The annalise suppress the annalise.", "logic": "\nnot Quantize(annalise, mitchel)\nPublic(annalise)\nUntrodden(annalise)\nCheese(annalise, mitchel)\nCheese(annalise, karmen)\nSuppress(annalise, karmen)\nQuantize(mitchel, annalise)\nMagyar(mitchel)\nnot Cheese(mitchel, annalise)\nInnate(karmen)\nPublic(karmen)\nIntramural(karmen)\nCheese(karmen, annalise)\nCheese(karmen, mitchel)\nSuppress(karmen, annalise)\nSuppress(karmen, mitchel)\nforall x (Quantize(x, annalise) -> Suppress(x, karmen))\nforall x (Quantize(x, karmen) and Cheese(karmen, annalise) -> not Suppress(annalise, mitchel))\nforall x (Cheese(x, karmen) and Magyar(x) -> Suppress(karmen, mitchel))\nforall x (Cheese(x, karmen) and Magyar(x) -> Quantize(x, karmen))\nforall x (Cheese(x, mitchel) and Suppress(mitchel, karmen) -> Quantize(mitchel, karmen))\nQuantize(mitchel, annalise) -> Public(annalise)\nforall x (Cheese(x, mitchel) and Suppress(x, karmen) -> Quantize(karmen, mitchel))\nforall x (Quantize(x, karmen) and Quantize(x, annalise) -> not Untrodden(karmen))\n\nSuppress(annalise, annalise)\n\nSuppress(annalise, annalise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The nedda does not chase the megan. The nedda is naive. The nedda is terrific. The nedda explore the megan. The nedda explore the joachim. The nedda unreel the joachim. The megan resorb the nedda. The megan is hewn. The megan does not like the nedda. The joachim is maverick. The joachim is naive. The joachim is unbaffled. The joachim explore the nedda. The joachim explore the megan. The joachim unreel the nedda. The joachim unreel the megan. If someone resorb the nedda then they see the joachim. If someone resorb the joachim and the joachim explore the nedda then the nedda does not see the megan. If someone explore the joachim and they are hewn then the joachim unreel the megan. If someone explore the joachim and they are hewn then they chase the joachim. If someone explore the megan and the megan unreel the joachim then the megan resorb the joachim. If the megan resorb the nedda then the nedda is naive. If someone explore the megan and they see the joachim then the joachim resorb the megan. If someone resorb the joachim and they chase the nedda then the joachim is not terrific. The joachim does not chase the nedda.", "logic": "\nnot Resorb(nedda, megan)\nNaive(nedda)\nTerrific(nedda)\nExplore(nedda, megan)\nExplore(nedda, joachim)\nUnreel(nedda, joachim)\nResorb(megan, nedda)\nHewn(megan)\nnot Explore(megan, nedda)\nMaverick(joachim)\nNaive(joachim)\nUnbaffled(joachim)\nExplore(joachim, nedda)\nExplore(joachim, megan)\nUnreel(joachim, nedda)\nUnreel(joachim, megan)\nforall x (Resorb(x, nedda) -> Unreel(x, joachim))\nforall x (Resorb(x, joachim) and Explore(joachim, nedda) -> not Unreel(nedda, megan))\nforall x (Explore(x, joachim) and Hewn(x) -> Unreel(joachim, megan))\nforall x (Explore(x, joachim) and Hewn(x) -> Resorb(x, joachim))\nforall x (Explore(x, megan) and Unreel(megan, joachim) -> Resorb(megan, joachim))\nResorb(megan, nedda) -> Naive(nedda)\nforall x (Explore(x, megan) and Unreel(x, joachim) -> Resorb(joachim, megan))\nforall x (Resorb(x, joachim) and Resorb(x, nedda) -> not Terrific(joachim))\n\nnot Resorb(joachim, nedda)\n\nnot Resorb(joachim, nedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The derick does not chase the jesse. The derick is senegalese. The derick is abbatial. The derick sham the jesse. The derick sham the gaynor. The derick twit the gaynor. The jesse venesect the derick. The jesse is biaural. The jesse does not like the derick. The gaynor is echoing. The gaynor is senegalese. The gaynor is awless. The gaynor sham the derick. The gaynor sham the jesse. The gaynor twit the derick. The gaynor twit the jesse. If someone venesect the derick then they see the gaynor. If someone venesect the gaynor and the gaynor sham the derick then the derick does not see the jesse. If someone sham the gaynor and they are biaural then the gaynor twit the jesse. If someone sham the gaynor and they are biaural then they chase the gaynor. If someone sham the jesse and the jesse twit the gaynor then the jesse venesect the gaynor. If the jesse venesect the derick then the derick is senegalese. If someone sham the jesse and they see the gaynor then the gaynor venesect the jesse. If someone venesect the gaynor and they chase the derick then the gaynor is not abbatial. The derick is awless.", "logic": "\nnot Venesect(derick, jesse)\nSenegalese(derick)\nAbbatial(derick)\nSham(derick, jesse)\nSham(derick, gaynor)\nTwit(derick, gaynor)\nVenesect(jesse, derick)\nBiaural(jesse)\nnot Sham(jesse, derick)\nEchoing(gaynor)\nSenegalese(gaynor)\nAwless(gaynor)\nSham(gaynor, derick)\nSham(gaynor, jesse)\nTwit(gaynor, derick)\nTwit(gaynor, jesse)\nforall x (Venesect(x, derick) -> Twit(x, gaynor))\nforall x (Venesect(x, gaynor) and Sham(gaynor, derick) -> not Twit(derick, jesse))\nforall x (Sham(x, gaynor) and Biaural(x) -> Twit(gaynor, jesse))\nforall x (Sham(x, gaynor) and Biaural(x) -> Venesect(x, gaynor))\nforall x (Sham(x, jesse) and Twit(jesse, gaynor) -> Venesect(jesse, gaynor))\nVenesect(jesse, derick) -> Senegalese(derick)\nforall x (Sham(x, jesse) and Twit(x, gaynor) -> Venesect(gaynor, jesse))\nforall x (Venesect(x, gaynor) and Venesect(x, derick) -> not Abbatial(gaynor))\n\nAwless(derick)\n\nAwless(derick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The rosa does not chase the chaddie. The rosa is unstirred. The rosa is unearthly. The rosa capitalise the chaddie. The rosa capitalise the ainslee. The rosa admonish the ainslee. The chaddie hyphen the rosa. The chaddie is middling. The chaddie does not like the rosa. The ainslee is iridic. The ainslee is unstirred. The ainslee is according. The ainslee capitalise the rosa. The ainslee capitalise the chaddie. The ainslee admonish the rosa. The ainslee admonish the chaddie. If someone hyphen the rosa then they see the ainslee. If someone hyphen the ainslee and the ainslee capitalise the rosa then the rosa does not see the chaddie. If someone capitalise the ainslee and they are middling then the ainslee admonish the chaddie. If someone capitalise the ainslee and they are middling then they chase the ainslee. If someone capitalise the chaddie and the chaddie admonish the ainslee then the chaddie hyphen the ainslee. If the chaddie hyphen the rosa then the rosa is unstirred. If someone capitalise the chaddie and they see the ainslee then the ainslee hyphen the chaddie. If someone hyphen the ainslee and they chase the rosa then the ainslee is not unearthly. The chaddie does not like the chaddie.", "logic": "\nnot Hyphen(rosa, chaddie)\nUnstirred(rosa)\nUnearthly(rosa)\nCapitalise(rosa, chaddie)\nCapitalise(rosa, ainslee)\nAdmonish(rosa, ainslee)\nHyphen(chaddie, rosa)\nMiddling(chaddie)\nnot Capitalise(chaddie, rosa)\nIridic(ainslee)\nUnstirred(ainslee)\nAccording(ainslee)\nCapitalise(ainslee, rosa)\nCapitalise(ainslee, chaddie)\nAdmonish(ainslee, rosa)\nAdmonish(ainslee, chaddie)\nforall x (Hyphen(x, rosa) -> Admonish(x, ainslee))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, ainslee) and Capitalise(ainslee, rosa) -> not Admonish(rosa, chaddie))\nforall x (Capitalise(x, ainslee) and Middling(x) -> Admonish(ainslee, chaddie))\nforall x (Capitalise(x, ainslee) and Middling(x) -> Hyphen(x, ainslee))\nforall x (Capitalise(x, chaddie) and Admonish(chaddie, ainslee) -> Hyphen(chaddie, ainslee))\nHyphen(chaddie, rosa) -> Unstirred(rosa)\nforall x (Capitalise(x, chaddie) and Admonish(x, ainslee) -> Hyphen(ainslee, chaddie))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, ainslee) and Hyphen(x, rosa) -> not Unearthly(ainslee))\n\nnot Capitalise(chaddie, chaddie)\n\nnot Capitalise(chaddie, chaddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "The patricio does not chase the larry. The patricio is malarial. The patricio is forward. The patricio swell the larry. The patricio swell the ethyl. The patricio handwash the ethyl. The larry flicker the patricio. The larry is bookable. The larry does not like the patricio. The ethyl is animal. The ethyl is malarial. The ethyl is notifiable. The ethyl swell the patricio. The ethyl swell the larry. The ethyl handwash the patricio. The ethyl handwash the larry. If someone flicker the patricio then they see the ethyl. If someone flicker the ethyl and the ethyl swell the patricio then the patricio does not see the larry. If someone swell the ethyl and they are bookable then the ethyl handwash the larry. If someone swell the ethyl and they are bookable then they chase the ethyl. If someone swell the larry and the larry handwash the ethyl then the larry flicker the ethyl. If the larry flicker the patricio then the patricio is malarial. If someone swell the larry and they see the ethyl then the ethyl flicker the larry. If someone flicker the ethyl and they chase the patricio then the ethyl is not forward. The patricio swell the patricio.", "logic": "\nnot Flicker(patricio, larry)\nMalarial(patricio)\nForward(patricio)\nSwell(patricio, larry)\nSwell(patricio, ethyl)\nHandwash(patricio, ethyl)\nFlicker(larry, patricio)\nBookable(larry)\nnot Swell(larry, patricio)\nAnimal(ethyl)\nMalarial(ethyl)\nNotifiable(ethyl)\nSwell(ethyl, patricio)\nSwell(ethyl, larry)\nHandwash(ethyl, patricio)\nHandwash(ethyl, larry)\nforall x (Flicker(x, patricio) -> Handwash(x, ethyl))\nforall x (Flicker(x, ethyl) and Swell(ethyl, patricio) -> not Handwash(patricio, larry))\nforall x (Swell(x, ethyl) and Bookable(x) -> Handwash(ethyl, larry))\nforall x (Swell(x, ethyl) and Bookable(x) -> Flicker(x, ethyl))\nforall x (Swell(x, larry) and Handwash(larry, ethyl) -> Flicker(larry, ethyl))\nFlicker(larry, patricio) -> Malarial(patricio)\nforall x (Swell(x, larry) and Handwash(x, ethyl) -> Flicker(ethyl, larry))\nforall x (Flicker(x, ethyl) and Flicker(x, patricio) -> not Forward(ethyl))\n\nSwell(patricio, patricio)\n\nSwell(patricio, patricio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-110"} {"premises": "Prissie is not deniable. Prissie is mousey. Prissie is tellurian. Prissie is regent. Prissie is trustful. Prissie is corinthian. Prissie is grainy. If Prissie is not regent then Prissie is not mousey. Big things are tellurian. If something is corinthian then it is tellurian. If something is deniable then it is tellurian. All deniable things are corinthian. Furry, mousey things are grainy. Prissie is regent.", "logic": "\nnot Deniable(prissie)\nMousey(prissie)\nTellurian(prissie)\nRegent(prissie)\nTrustful(prissie)\nCorinthian(prissie)\nGrainy(prissie)\nnot Regent(prissie) -> not Mousey(prissie)\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Tellurian(x))\nforall x (Corinthian(x) -> Tellurian(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Tellurian(x))\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Tellurian(x) and Mousey(x) -> Grainy(x))\n\nRegent(prissie)\n\ntherefore Regent(prissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3436"} {"premises": "Maria is not cowardly. Maria is phenomenal. Maria is cloudy. Maria is crinoid. Maria is fivefold. Maria is foliate. Maria is shakedown. If Maria is not crinoid then Maria is not phenomenal. Big things are cloudy. If something is foliate then it is cloudy. If something is cowardly then it is cloudy. All cowardly things are foliate. Furry, phenomenal things are shakedown. Maria is not crinoid.", "logic": "\nnot Cowardly(maria)\nPhenomenal(maria)\nCloudy(maria)\nCrinoid(maria)\nFivefold(maria)\nFoliate(maria)\nShakedown(maria)\nnot Crinoid(maria) -> not Phenomenal(maria)\nforall x (Cowardly(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Foliate(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) -> Foliate(x))\nforall x (Cloudy(x) and Phenomenal(x) -> Shakedown(x))\n\nnot Crinoid(maria)\n\ntherefore Crinoid(maria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3436"} {"premises": "The gerty does not chase the keefe. The gerty does not eat the hendrik. The gerty estrange the keefe. The gerty is not ectodermic. The gerty is lowland. The gerty does not need the hendrik. The gerty dyke the keefe. The hendrik filet the gerty. The hendrik estrange the gerty. The hendrik estrange the keefe. The hendrik dyke the gerty. The hendrik does not need the keefe. The keefe estrange the gerty. The keefe is unliveried. The keefe is anaglyptic. The keefe dyke the hendrik. If something dyke the hendrik then it does not chase the gerty. If the hendrik is lowland and the hendrik does not eat the gerty then the gerty is not lowland. If something estrange the hendrik and the hendrik is not lowland then it dyke the gerty. If something filet the hendrik then it dyke the gerty. If something is ectodermic and not lowland then it filet the hendrik. If something is unliveried and it does not chase the gerty then it filet the hendrik. The hendrik estrange the gerty.", "logic": "\nnot Filet(gerty, keefe)\nnot Estrange(gerty, hendrik)\nEstrange(gerty, keefe)\nnot Ectodermic(gerty)\nLowland(gerty)\nnot Dyke(gerty, hendrik)\nDyke(gerty, keefe)\nFilet(hendrik, gerty)\nEstrange(hendrik, gerty)\nEstrange(hendrik, keefe)\nDyke(hendrik, gerty)\nnot Dyke(hendrik, keefe)\nEstrange(keefe, gerty)\nUnliveried(keefe)\nAnaglyptic(keefe)\nDyke(keefe, hendrik)\nforall x (Dyke(x, hendrik) -> not Filet(x, gerty))\nLowland(hendrik) and not Estrange(hendrik, gerty) -> not Lowland(gerty)\nforall x (Estrange(x, hendrik) and not Lowland(hendrik) -> Dyke(x, gerty))\nforall x (Filet(x, hendrik) -> Dyke(x, gerty))\nforall x (Ectodermic(x) and not Lowland(x) -> Filet(x, hendrik))\nforall x (Unliveried(x) and not Filet(x, gerty) -> Filet(x, hendrik))\n\nEstrange(hendrik, gerty)\n\ntherefore Estrange(hendrik, gerty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The leola does not chase the rollins. The leola does not eat the calvin. The leola ostracise the rollins. The leola is not explicable. The leola is javan. The leola does not need the calvin. The leola bounce the rollins. The calvin swathe the leola. The calvin ostracise the leola. The calvin ostracise the rollins. The calvin bounce the leola. The calvin does not need the rollins. The rollins ostracise the leola. The rollins is cursive. The rollins is stomatous. The rollins bounce the calvin. If something bounce the calvin then it does not chase the leola. If the calvin is javan and the calvin does not eat the leola then the leola is not javan. If something ostracise the calvin and the calvin is not javan then it bounce the leola. If something swathe the calvin then it bounce the leola. If something is explicable and not javan then it swathe the calvin. If something is cursive and it does not chase the leola then it swathe the calvin. The calvin does not need the leola.", "logic": "\nnot Swathe(leola, rollins)\nnot Ostracise(leola, calvin)\nOstracise(leola, rollins)\nnot Explicable(leola)\nJavan(leola)\nnot Bounce(leola, calvin)\nBounce(leola, rollins)\nSwathe(calvin, leola)\nOstracise(calvin, leola)\nOstracise(calvin, rollins)\nBounce(calvin, leola)\nnot Bounce(calvin, rollins)\nOstracise(rollins, leola)\nCursive(rollins)\nStomatous(rollins)\nBounce(rollins, calvin)\nforall x (Bounce(x, calvin) -> not Swathe(x, leola))\nJavan(calvin) and not Ostracise(calvin, leola) -> not Javan(leola)\nforall x (Ostracise(x, calvin) and not Javan(calvin) -> Bounce(x, leola))\nforall x (Swathe(x, calvin) -> Bounce(x, leola))\nforall x (Explicable(x) and not Javan(x) -> Swathe(x, calvin))\nforall x (Cursive(x) and not Swathe(x, leola) -> Swathe(x, calvin))\n\nnot Bounce(calvin, leola)\n\ntherefore Bounce(calvin, leola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The zebulon does not chase the leela. The zebulon does not eat the elden. The zebulon gift the leela. The zebulon is not retained. The zebulon is secure. The zebulon does not need the elden. The zebulon outflank the leela. The elden crank the zebulon. The elden gift the zebulon. The elden gift the leela. The elden outflank the zebulon. The elden does not need the leela. The leela gift the zebulon. The leela is baltic. The leela is embezzled. The leela outflank the elden. If something outflank the elden then it does not chase the zebulon. If the elden is secure and the elden does not eat the zebulon then the zebulon is not secure. If something gift the elden and the elden is not secure then it outflank the zebulon. If something crank the elden then it outflank the zebulon. If something is retained and not secure then it crank the elden. If something is baltic and it does not chase the zebulon then it crank the elden. The leela does not chase the zebulon.", "logic": "\nnot Crank(zebulon, leela)\nnot Gift(zebulon, elden)\nGift(zebulon, leela)\nnot Retained(zebulon)\nSecure(zebulon)\nnot Outflank(zebulon, elden)\nOutflank(zebulon, leela)\nCrank(elden, zebulon)\nGift(elden, zebulon)\nGift(elden, leela)\nOutflank(elden, zebulon)\nnot Outflank(elden, leela)\nGift(leela, zebulon)\nBaltic(leela)\nEmbezzled(leela)\nOutflank(leela, elden)\nforall x (Outflank(x, elden) -> not Crank(x, zebulon))\nSecure(elden) and not Gift(elden, zebulon) -> not Secure(zebulon)\nforall x (Gift(x, elden) and not Secure(elden) -> Outflank(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Crank(x, elden) -> Outflank(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Retained(x) and not Secure(x) -> Crank(x, elden))\nforall x (Baltic(x) and not Crank(x, zebulon) -> Crank(x, elden))\n\nnot Crank(leela, zebulon)\n\nOutflank(leela, elden) and forall x (Outflank(x, elden) -> not Crank(x, zebulon)) -> therefore not Crank(leela, zebulon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The gwenette does not chase the judy. The gwenette does not eat the carlee. The gwenette eviscerate the judy. The gwenette is not joking. The gwenette is hammered. The gwenette does not need the carlee. The gwenette slug the judy. The carlee name the gwenette. The carlee eviscerate the gwenette. The carlee eviscerate the judy. The carlee slug the gwenette. The carlee does not need the judy. The judy eviscerate the gwenette. The judy is heavenly. The judy is moonstruck. The judy slug the carlee. If something slug the carlee then it does not chase the gwenette. If the carlee is hammered and the carlee does not eat the gwenette then the gwenette is not hammered. If something eviscerate the carlee and the carlee is not hammered then it slug the gwenette. If something name the carlee then it slug the gwenette. If something is joking and not hammered then it name the carlee. If something is heavenly and it does not chase the gwenette then it name the carlee. The judy name the gwenette.", "logic": "\nnot Name(gwenette, judy)\nnot Eviscerate(gwenette, carlee)\nEviscerate(gwenette, judy)\nnot Joking(gwenette)\nHammered(gwenette)\nnot Slug(gwenette, carlee)\nSlug(gwenette, judy)\nName(carlee, gwenette)\nEviscerate(carlee, gwenette)\nEviscerate(carlee, judy)\nSlug(carlee, gwenette)\nnot Slug(carlee, judy)\nEviscerate(judy, gwenette)\nHeavenly(judy)\nMoonstruck(judy)\nSlug(judy, carlee)\nforall x (Slug(x, carlee) -> not Name(x, gwenette))\nHammered(carlee) and not Eviscerate(carlee, gwenette) -> not Hammered(gwenette)\nforall x (Eviscerate(x, carlee) and not Hammered(carlee) -> Slug(x, gwenette))\nforall x (Name(x, carlee) -> Slug(x, gwenette))\nforall x (Joking(x) and not Hammered(x) -> Name(x, carlee))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) and not Name(x, gwenette) -> Name(x, carlee))\n\nName(judy, gwenette)\n\nSlug(judy, carlee) and forall x (Slug(x, carlee) -> not Name(x, gwenette)) -> therefore not Name(judy, gwenette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The damara does not chase the chrissy. The damara does not eat the alecia. The damara gyrate the chrissy. The damara is not panoptical. The damara is billiard. The damara does not need the alecia. The damara unhook the chrissy. The alecia elevate the damara. The alecia gyrate the damara. The alecia gyrate the chrissy. The alecia unhook the damara. The alecia does not need the chrissy. The chrissy gyrate the damara. The chrissy is extendable. The chrissy is handmade. The chrissy unhook the alecia. If something unhook the alecia then it does not chase the damara. If the alecia is billiard and the alecia does not eat the damara then the damara is not billiard. If something gyrate the alecia and the alecia is not billiard then it unhook the damara. If something elevate the alecia then it unhook the damara. If something is panoptical and not billiard then it elevate the alecia. If something is extendable and it does not chase the damara then it elevate the alecia. The chrissy elevate the alecia.", "logic": "\nnot Elevate(damara, chrissy)\nnot Gyrate(damara, alecia)\nGyrate(damara, chrissy)\nnot Panoptical(damara)\nBilliard(damara)\nnot Unhook(damara, alecia)\nUnhook(damara, chrissy)\nElevate(alecia, damara)\nGyrate(alecia, damara)\nGyrate(alecia, chrissy)\nUnhook(alecia, damara)\nnot Unhook(alecia, chrissy)\nGyrate(chrissy, damara)\nExtendable(chrissy)\nHandmade(chrissy)\nUnhook(chrissy, alecia)\nforall x (Unhook(x, alecia) -> not Elevate(x, damara))\nBilliard(alecia) and not Gyrate(alecia, damara) -> not Billiard(damara)\nforall x (Gyrate(x, alecia) and not Billiard(alecia) -> Unhook(x, damara))\nforall x (Elevate(x, alecia) -> Unhook(x, damara))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) and not Billiard(x) -> Elevate(x, alecia))\nforall x (Extendable(x) and not Elevate(x, damara) -> Elevate(x, alecia))\n\nElevate(chrissy, alecia)\n\nUnhook(chrissy, alecia) and forall x (Unhook(x, alecia) -> not Elevate(x, damara)) -> therefore not Elevate(chrissy, damara) Extendable(chrissy) and not Elevate(chrissy, damara) and forall x (Extendable(x) and not Elevate(x, damara) -> Elevate(x, alecia)) -> therefore Elevate(chrissy, alecia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The corabella does not chase the hector. The corabella does not eat the selia. The corabella chomp the hector. The corabella is not egyptian. The corabella is tinned. The corabella does not need the selia. The corabella suffuse the hector. The selia islamize the corabella. The selia chomp the corabella. The selia chomp the hector. The selia suffuse the corabella. The selia does not need the hector. The hector chomp the corabella. The hector is hominine. The hector is capable. The hector suffuse the selia. If something suffuse the selia then it does not chase the corabella. If the selia is tinned and the selia does not eat the corabella then the corabella is not tinned. If something chomp the selia and the selia is not tinned then it suffuse the corabella. If something islamize the selia then it suffuse the corabella. If something is egyptian and not tinned then it islamize the selia. If something is hominine and it does not chase the corabella then it islamize the selia. The hector does not chase the selia.", "logic": "\nnot Islamize(corabella, hector)\nnot Chomp(corabella, selia)\nChomp(corabella, hector)\nnot Egyptian(corabella)\nTinned(corabella)\nnot Suffuse(corabella, selia)\nSuffuse(corabella, hector)\nIslamize(selia, corabella)\nChomp(selia, corabella)\nChomp(selia, hector)\nSuffuse(selia, corabella)\nnot Suffuse(selia, hector)\nChomp(hector, corabella)\nHominine(hector)\nCapable(hector)\nSuffuse(hector, selia)\nforall x (Suffuse(x, selia) -> not Islamize(x, corabella))\nTinned(selia) and not Chomp(selia, corabella) -> not Tinned(corabella)\nforall x (Chomp(x, selia) and not Tinned(selia) -> Suffuse(x, corabella))\nforall x (Islamize(x, selia) -> Suffuse(x, corabella))\nforall x (Egyptian(x) and not Tinned(x) -> Islamize(x, selia))\nforall x (Hominine(x) and not Islamize(x, corabella) -> Islamize(x, selia))\n\nnot Islamize(hector, selia)\n\nSuffuse(hector, selia) and forall x (Suffuse(x, selia) -> not Islamize(x, corabella)) -> therefore not Islamize(hector, corabella) Hominine(hector) and not Islamize(hector, corabella) and forall x (Hominine(x) and not Islamize(x, corabella) -> Islamize(x, selia)) -> therefore Islamize(hector, selia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The ellwood does not chase the xymenes. The ellwood does not eat the debbie. The ellwood gormandise the xymenes. The ellwood is not clarifying. The ellwood is basined. The ellwood does not need the debbie. The ellwood help the xymenes. The debbie clutch the ellwood. The debbie gormandise the ellwood. The debbie gormandise the xymenes. The debbie help the ellwood. The debbie does not need the xymenes. The xymenes gormandise the ellwood. The xymenes is fiscal. The xymenes is stingy. The xymenes help the debbie. If something help the debbie then it does not chase the ellwood. If the debbie is basined and the debbie does not eat the ellwood then the ellwood is not basined. If something gormandise the debbie and the debbie is not basined then it help the ellwood. If something clutch the debbie then it help the ellwood. If something is clarifying and not basined then it clutch the debbie. If something is fiscal and it does not chase the ellwood then it clutch the debbie. The xymenes help the ellwood.", "logic": "\nnot Clutch(ellwood, xymenes)\nnot Gormandise(ellwood, debbie)\nGormandise(ellwood, xymenes)\nnot Clarifying(ellwood)\nBasined(ellwood)\nnot Help(ellwood, debbie)\nHelp(ellwood, xymenes)\nClutch(debbie, ellwood)\nGormandise(debbie, ellwood)\nGormandise(debbie, xymenes)\nHelp(debbie, ellwood)\nnot Help(debbie, xymenes)\nGormandise(xymenes, ellwood)\nFiscal(xymenes)\nStingy(xymenes)\nHelp(xymenes, debbie)\nforall x (Help(x, debbie) -> not Clutch(x, ellwood))\nBasined(debbie) and not Gormandise(debbie, ellwood) -> not Basined(ellwood)\nforall x (Gormandise(x, debbie) and not Basined(debbie) -> Help(x, ellwood))\nforall x (Clutch(x, debbie) -> Help(x, ellwood))\nforall x (Clarifying(x) and not Basined(x) -> Clutch(x, debbie))\nforall x (Fiscal(x) and not Clutch(x, ellwood) -> Clutch(x, debbie))\n\nHelp(xymenes, ellwood)\n\nHelp(xymenes, debbie) and forall x (Help(x, debbie) -> not Clutch(x, ellwood)) -> therefore not Clutch(xymenes, ellwood) Fiscal(xymenes) and not Clutch(xymenes, ellwood) and forall x (Fiscal(x) and not Clutch(x, ellwood) -> Clutch(x, debbie)) -> therefore Clutch(xymenes, debbie) Clutch(xymenes, debbie) and forall x (Clutch(x, debbie) -> Help(x, ellwood)) -> therefore Help(xymenes, ellwood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The lacie does not chase the danie. The lacie does not eat the roni. The lacie demobilise the danie. The lacie is not careless. The lacie is absurd. The lacie does not need the roni. The lacie tune the danie. The roni disprove the lacie. The roni demobilise the lacie. The roni demobilise the danie. The roni tune the lacie. The roni does not need the danie. The danie demobilise the lacie. The danie is hottish. The danie is subgross. The danie tune the roni. If something tune the roni then it does not chase the lacie. If the roni is absurd and the roni does not eat the lacie then the lacie is not absurd. If something demobilise the roni and the roni is not absurd then it tune the lacie. If something disprove the roni then it tune the lacie. If something is careless and not absurd then it disprove the roni. If something is hottish and it does not chase the lacie then it disprove the roni. The danie does not need the lacie.", "logic": "\nnot Disprove(lacie, danie)\nnot Demobilise(lacie, roni)\nDemobilise(lacie, danie)\nnot Careless(lacie)\nAbsurd(lacie)\nnot Tune(lacie, roni)\nTune(lacie, danie)\nDisprove(roni, lacie)\nDemobilise(roni, lacie)\nDemobilise(roni, danie)\nTune(roni, lacie)\nnot Tune(roni, danie)\nDemobilise(danie, lacie)\nHottish(danie)\nSubgross(danie)\nTune(danie, roni)\nforall x (Tune(x, roni) -> not Disprove(x, lacie))\nAbsurd(roni) and not Demobilise(roni, lacie) -> not Absurd(lacie)\nforall x (Demobilise(x, roni) and not Absurd(roni) -> Tune(x, lacie))\nforall x (Disprove(x, roni) -> Tune(x, lacie))\nforall x (Careless(x) and not Absurd(x) -> Disprove(x, roni))\nforall x (Hottish(x) and not Disprove(x, lacie) -> Disprove(x, roni))\n\nnot Tune(danie, lacie)\n\nTune(danie, roni) and forall x (Tune(x, roni) -> not Disprove(x, lacie)) -> therefore not Disprove(danie, lacie) Hottish(danie) and not Disprove(danie, lacie) and forall x (Hottish(x) and not Disprove(x, lacie) -> Disprove(x, roni)) -> therefore Disprove(danie, roni) Disprove(danie, roni) and forall x (Disprove(x, roni) -> Tune(x, lacie)) -> therefore Tune(danie, lacie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The meade does not chase the koralle. The meade does not eat the shelby. The meade parallel the koralle. The meade is not pliable. The meade is increasing. The meade does not need the shelby. The meade truss the koralle. The shelby garotte the meade. The shelby parallel the meade. The shelby parallel the koralle. The shelby truss the meade. The shelby does not need the koralle. The koralle parallel the meade. The koralle is frenetic. The koralle is imbalanced. The koralle truss the shelby. If something truss the shelby then it does not chase the meade. If the shelby is increasing and the shelby does not eat the meade then the meade is not increasing. If something parallel the shelby and the shelby is not increasing then it truss the meade. If something garotte the shelby then it truss the meade. If something is pliable and not increasing then it garotte the shelby. If something is frenetic and it does not chase the meade then it garotte the shelby. The meade does not chase the shelby.", "logic": "\nnot Garotte(meade, koralle)\nnot Parallel(meade, shelby)\nParallel(meade, koralle)\nnot Pliable(meade)\nIncreasing(meade)\nnot Truss(meade, shelby)\nTruss(meade, koralle)\nGarotte(shelby, meade)\nParallel(shelby, meade)\nParallel(shelby, koralle)\nTruss(shelby, meade)\nnot Truss(shelby, koralle)\nParallel(koralle, meade)\nFrenetic(koralle)\nImbalanced(koralle)\nTruss(koralle, shelby)\nforall x (Truss(x, shelby) -> not Garotte(x, meade))\nIncreasing(shelby) and not Parallel(shelby, meade) -> not Increasing(meade)\nforall x (Parallel(x, shelby) and not Increasing(shelby) -> Truss(x, meade))\nforall x (Garotte(x, shelby) -> Truss(x, meade))\nforall x (Pliable(x) and not Increasing(x) -> Garotte(x, shelby))\nforall x (Frenetic(x) and not Garotte(x, meade) -> Garotte(x, shelby))\n\nnot Garotte(meade, shelby)\n\nforall x (Pliable(x) and not Increasing(x) -> Garotte(x, shelby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The josepha does not chase the prasun. The josepha does not eat the sylvia. The josepha federalise the prasun. The josepha is not slushy. The josepha is helpful. The josepha does not need the sylvia. The josepha chart the prasun. The sylvia putter the josepha. The sylvia federalise the josepha. The sylvia federalise the prasun. The sylvia chart the josepha. The sylvia does not need the prasun. The prasun federalise the josepha. The prasun is winking. The prasun is lecherous. The prasun chart the sylvia. If something chart the sylvia then it does not chase the josepha. If the sylvia is helpful and the sylvia does not eat the josepha then the josepha is not helpful. If something federalise the sylvia and the sylvia is not helpful then it chart the josepha. If something putter the sylvia then it chart the josepha. If something is slushy and not helpful then it putter the sylvia. If something is winking and it does not chase the josepha then it putter the sylvia. The josepha chart the josepha.", "logic": "\nnot Putter(josepha, prasun)\nnot Federalise(josepha, sylvia)\nFederalise(josepha, prasun)\nnot Slushy(josepha)\nHelpful(josepha)\nnot Chart(josepha, sylvia)\nChart(josepha, prasun)\nPutter(sylvia, josepha)\nFederalise(sylvia, josepha)\nFederalise(sylvia, prasun)\nChart(sylvia, josepha)\nnot Chart(sylvia, prasun)\nFederalise(prasun, josepha)\nWinking(prasun)\nLecherous(prasun)\nChart(prasun, sylvia)\nforall x (Chart(x, sylvia) -> not Putter(x, josepha))\nHelpful(sylvia) and not Federalise(sylvia, josepha) -> not Helpful(josepha)\nforall x (Federalise(x, sylvia) and not Helpful(sylvia) -> Chart(x, josepha))\nforall x (Putter(x, sylvia) -> Chart(x, josepha))\nforall x (Slushy(x) and not Helpful(x) -> Putter(x, sylvia))\nforall x (Winking(x) and not Putter(x, josepha) -> Putter(x, sylvia))\n\nChart(josepha, josepha)\n\nforall x (Putter(x, sylvia) -> Chart(x, josepha)) <- forall x (Slushy(x) and not Helpful(x) -> Putter(x, sylvia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The adams does not chase the bogart. The adams does not eat the alameda. The adams crawfish the bogart. The adams is not changed. The adams is depilatory. The adams does not need the alameda. The adams stretch the bogart. The alameda backcross the adams. The alameda crawfish the adams. The alameda crawfish the bogart. The alameda stretch the adams. The alameda does not need the bogart. The bogart crawfish the adams. The bogart is potent. The bogart is operable. The bogart stretch the alameda. If something stretch the alameda then it does not chase the adams. If the alameda is depilatory and the alameda does not eat the adams then the adams is not depilatory. If something crawfish the alameda and the alameda is not depilatory then it stretch the adams. If something backcross the alameda then it stretch the adams. If something is changed and not depilatory then it backcross the alameda. If something is potent and it does not chase the adams then it backcross the alameda. The alameda does not chase the alameda.", "logic": "\nnot Backcross(adams, bogart)\nnot Crawfish(adams, alameda)\nCrawfish(adams, bogart)\nnot Changed(adams)\nDepilatory(adams)\nnot Stretch(adams, alameda)\nStretch(adams, bogart)\nBackcross(alameda, adams)\nCrawfish(alameda, adams)\nCrawfish(alameda, bogart)\nStretch(alameda, adams)\nnot Stretch(alameda, bogart)\nCrawfish(bogart, adams)\nPotent(bogart)\nOperable(bogart)\nStretch(bogart, alameda)\nforall x (Stretch(x, alameda) -> not Backcross(x, adams))\nDepilatory(alameda) and not Crawfish(alameda, adams) -> not Depilatory(adams)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, alameda) and not Depilatory(alameda) -> Stretch(x, adams))\nforall x (Backcross(x, alameda) -> Stretch(x, adams))\nforall x (Changed(x) and not Depilatory(x) -> Backcross(x, alameda))\nforall x (Potent(x) and not Backcross(x, adams) -> Backcross(x, alameda))\n\nnot Backcross(alameda, alameda)\n\nforall x (Changed(x) and not Depilatory(x) -> Backcross(x, alameda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The reyna does not chase the kaitlynn. The reyna does not eat the zsazsa. The reyna stockpile the kaitlynn. The reyna is not sixfold. The reyna is greenhouse. The reyna does not need the zsazsa. The reyna eruct the kaitlynn. The zsazsa retrovert the reyna. The zsazsa stockpile the reyna. The zsazsa stockpile the kaitlynn. The zsazsa eruct the reyna. The zsazsa does not need the kaitlynn. The kaitlynn stockpile the reyna. The kaitlynn is olivelike. The kaitlynn is semirigid. The kaitlynn eruct the zsazsa. If something eruct the zsazsa then it does not chase the reyna. If the zsazsa is greenhouse and the zsazsa does not eat the reyna then the reyna is not greenhouse. If something stockpile the zsazsa and the zsazsa is not greenhouse then it eruct the reyna. If something retrovert the zsazsa then it eruct the reyna. If something is sixfold and not greenhouse then it retrovert the zsazsa. If something is olivelike and it does not chase the reyna then it retrovert the zsazsa. The zsazsa is blue.", "logic": "\nnot Retrovert(reyna, kaitlynn)\nnot Stockpile(reyna, zsazsa)\nStockpile(reyna, kaitlynn)\nnot Sixfold(reyna)\nGreenhouse(reyna)\nnot Eruct(reyna, zsazsa)\nEruct(reyna, kaitlynn)\nRetrovert(zsazsa, reyna)\nStockpile(zsazsa, reyna)\nStockpile(zsazsa, kaitlynn)\nEruct(zsazsa, reyna)\nnot Eruct(zsazsa, kaitlynn)\nStockpile(kaitlynn, reyna)\nOlivelike(kaitlynn)\nSemirigid(kaitlynn)\nEruct(kaitlynn, zsazsa)\nforall x (Eruct(x, zsazsa) -> not Retrovert(x, reyna))\nGreenhouse(zsazsa) and not Stockpile(zsazsa, reyna) -> not Greenhouse(reyna)\nforall x (Stockpile(x, zsazsa) and not Greenhouse(zsazsa) -> Eruct(x, reyna))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, zsazsa) -> Eruct(x, reyna))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and not Greenhouse(x) -> Retrovert(x, zsazsa))\nforall x (Olivelike(x) and not Retrovert(x, reyna) -> Retrovert(x, zsazsa))\n\nBlue(zsazsa)\n\nBlue(zsazsa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The xerxes does not chase the sigfried. The xerxes does not eat the lynelle. The xerxes foreclose the sigfried. The xerxes is not bigeminal. The xerxes is austrian. The xerxes does not need the lynelle. The xerxes refashion the sigfried. The lynelle drudge the xerxes. The lynelle foreclose the xerxes. The lynelle foreclose the sigfried. The lynelle refashion the xerxes. The lynelle does not need the sigfried. The sigfried foreclose the xerxes. The sigfried is sinuous. The sigfried is upmost. The sigfried refashion the lynelle. If something refashion the lynelle then it does not chase the xerxes. If the lynelle is austrian and the lynelle does not eat the xerxes then the xerxes is not austrian. If something foreclose the lynelle and the lynelle is not austrian then it refashion the xerxes. If something drudge the lynelle then it refashion the xerxes. If something is bigeminal and not austrian then it drudge the lynelle. If something is sinuous and it does not chase the xerxes then it drudge the lynelle. The lynelle does not chase the sigfried.", "logic": "\nnot Drudge(xerxes, sigfried)\nnot Foreclose(xerxes, lynelle)\nForeclose(xerxes, sigfried)\nnot Bigeminal(xerxes)\nAustrian(xerxes)\nnot Refashion(xerxes, lynelle)\nRefashion(xerxes, sigfried)\nDrudge(lynelle, xerxes)\nForeclose(lynelle, xerxes)\nForeclose(lynelle, sigfried)\nRefashion(lynelle, xerxes)\nnot Refashion(lynelle, sigfried)\nForeclose(sigfried, xerxes)\nSinuous(sigfried)\nUpmost(sigfried)\nRefashion(sigfried, lynelle)\nforall x (Refashion(x, lynelle) -> not Drudge(x, xerxes))\nAustrian(lynelle) and not Foreclose(lynelle, xerxes) -> not Austrian(xerxes)\nforall x (Foreclose(x, lynelle) and not Austrian(lynelle) -> Refashion(x, xerxes))\nforall x (Drudge(x, lynelle) -> Refashion(x, xerxes))\nforall x (Bigeminal(x) and not Austrian(x) -> Drudge(x, lynelle))\nforall x (Sinuous(x) and not Drudge(x, xerxes) -> Drudge(x, lynelle))\n\nnot Drudge(lynelle, sigfried)\n\nnot Drudge(lynelle, sigfried) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The charlotte does not chase the marigold. The charlotte does not eat the dorit. The charlotte felicitate the marigold. The charlotte is not phrenetic. The charlotte is euphonic. The charlotte does not need the dorit. The charlotte adorn the marigold. The dorit riposte the charlotte. The dorit felicitate the charlotte. The dorit felicitate the marigold. The dorit adorn the charlotte. The dorit does not need the marigold. The marigold felicitate the charlotte. The marigold is dabbled. The marigold is necklike. The marigold adorn the dorit. If something adorn the dorit then it does not chase the charlotte. If the dorit is euphonic and the dorit does not eat the charlotte then the charlotte is not euphonic. If something felicitate the dorit and the dorit is not euphonic then it adorn the charlotte. If something riposte the dorit then it adorn the charlotte. If something is phrenetic and not euphonic then it riposte the dorit. If something is dabbled and it does not chase the charlotte then it riposte the dorit. The charlotte is necklike.", "logic": "\nnot Riposte(charlotte, marigold)\nnot Felicitate(charlotte, dorit)\nFelicitate(charlotte, marigold)\nnot Phrenetic(charlotte)\nEuphonic(charlotte)\nnot Adorn(charlotte, dorit)\nAdorn(charlotte, marigold)\nRiposte(dorit, charlotte)\nFelicitate(dorit, charlotte)\nFelicitate(dorit, marigold)\nAdorn(dorit, charlotte)\nnot Adorn(dorit, marigold)\nFelicitate(marigold, charlotte)\nDabbled(marigold)\nNecklike(marigold)\nAdorn(marigold, dorit)\nforall x (Adorn(x, dorit) -> not Riposte(x, charlotte))\nEuphonic(dorit) and not Felicitate(dorit, charlotte) -> not Euphonic(charlotte)\nforall x (Felicitate(x, dorit) and not Euphonic(dorit) -> Adorn(x, charlotte))\nforall x (Riposte(x, dorit) -> Adorn(x, charlotte))\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) and not Euphonic(x) -> Riposte(x, dorit))\nforall x (Dabbled(x) and not Riposte(x, charlotte) -> Riposte(x, dorit))\n\nNecklike(charlotte)\n\nNecklike(charlotte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The wayland does not chase the ewan. The wayland does not eat the ervin. The wayland exhilarate the ewan. The wayland is not bitty. The wayland is mesial. The wayland does not need the ervin. The wayland prettify the ewan. The ervin understudy the wayland. The ervin exhilarate the wayland. The ervin exhilarate the ewan. The ervin prettify the wayland. The ervin does not need the ewan. The ewan exhilarate the wayland. The ewan is illusional. The ewan is windup. The ewan prettify the ervin. If something prettify the ervin then it does not chase the wayland. If the ervin is mesial and the ervin does not eat the wayland then the wayland is not mesial. If something exhilarate the ervin and the ervin is not mesial then it prettify the wayland. If something understudy the ervin then it prettify the wayland. If something is bitty and not mesial then it understudy the ervin. If something is illusional and it does not chase the wayland then it understudy the ervin. The ewan does not eat the ervin.", "logic": "\nnot Understudy(wayland, ewan)\nnot Exhilarate(wayland, ervin)\nExhilarate(wayland, ewan)\nnot Bitty(wayland)\nMesial(wayland)\nnot Prettify(wayland, ervin)\nPrettify(wayland, ewan)\nUnderstudy(ervin, wayland)\nExhilarate(ervin, wayland)\nExhilarate(ervin, ewan)\nPrettify(ervin, wayland)\nnot Prettify(ervin, ewan)\nExhilarate(ewan, wayland)\nIllusional(ewan)\nWindup(ewan)\nPrettify(ewan, ervin)\nforall x (Prettify(x, ervin) -> not Understudy(x, wayland))\nMesial(ervin) and not Exhilarate(ervin, wayland) -> not Mesial(wayland)\nforall x (Exhilarate(x, ervin) and not Mesial(ervin) -> Prettify(x, wayland))\nforall x (Understudy(x, ervin) -> Prettify(x, wayland))\nforall x (Bitty(x) and not Mesial(x) -> Understudy(x, ervin))\nforall x (Illusional(x) and not Understudy(x, wayland) -> Understudy(x, ervin))\n\nnot Exhilarate(ewan, ervin)\n\nnot Exhilarate(ewan, ervin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The carolyn does not chase the aime. The carolyn does not eat the carmelia. The carolyn reside the aime. The carolyn is not chaldaean. The carolyn is perdurable. The carolyn does not need the carmelia. The carolyn renew the aime. The carmelia huff the carolyn. The carmelia reside the carolyn. The carmelia reside the aime. The carmelia renew the carolyn. The carmelia does not need the aime. The aime reside the carolyn. The aime is dynamical. The aime is sissified. The aime renew the carmelia. If something renew the carmelia then it does not chase the carolyn. If the carmelia is perdurable and the carmelia does not eat the carolyn then the carolyn is not perdurable. If something reside the carmelia and the carmelia is not perdurable then it renew the carolyn. If something huff the carmelia then it renew the carolyn. If something is chaldaean and not perdurable then it huff the carmelia. If something is dynamical and it does not chase the carolyn then it huff the carmelia. The carmelia reside the carmelia.", "logic": "\nnot Huff(carolyn, aime)\nnot Reside(carolyn, carmelia)\nReside(carolyn, aime)\nnot Chaldaean(carolyn)\nPerdurable(carolyn)\nnot Renew(carolyn, carmelia)\nRenew(carolyn, aime)\nHuff(carmelia, carolyn)\nReside(carmelia, carolyn)\nReside(carmelia, aime)\nRenew(carmelia, carolyn)\nnot Renew(carmelia, aime)\nReside(aime, carolyn)\nDynamical(aime)\nSissified(aime)\nRenew(aime, carmelia)\nforall x (Renew(x, carmelia) -> not Huff(x, carolyn))\nPerdurable(carmelia) and not Reside(carmelia, carolyn) -> not Perdurable(carolyn)\nforall x (Reside(x, carmelia) and not Perdurable(carmelia) -> Renew(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Huff(x, carmelia) -> Renew(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) and not Perdurable(x) -> Huff(x, carmelia))\nforall x (Dynamical(x) and not Huff(x, carolyn) -> Huff(x, carmelia))\n\nReside(carmelia, carmelia)\n\nReside(carmelia, carmelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-467"} {"premises": "The nannette is exact. The micheline is not starchy. The alexandra is starchy. The berke interbreed the micheline. The berke sour the nannette. The berke caper the nannette. The berke caper the alexandra. If someone interbreed the nannette then the nannette sour the micheline. If the micheline caper the berke then the micheline is stretchy. If someone is starchy and they visit the berke then the berke caper the alexandra. If someone interbreed the micheline then the micheline caper the berke. If someone sour the nannette and the nannette is exact then they visit the alexandra. If someone is stretchy then they visit the alexandra. If someone sour the micheline and they chase the nannette then the micheline does not visit the alexandra. If someone sour the micheline then the micheline is beseeching. The berke interbreed the micheline.", "logic": "\nExact(nannette)\nnot Starchy(micheline)\nStarchy(alexandra)\nInterbreed(berke, micheline)\nSour(berke, nannette)\nCaper(berke, nannette)\nCaper(berke, alexandra)\nforall x (Interbreed(x, nannette) -> Sour(nannette, micheline))\nCaper(micheline, berke) -> Stretchy(micheline)\nforall x (Starchy(x) and Caper(x, berke) -> Caper(berke, alexandra))\nforall x (Interbreed(x, micheline) -> Caper(micheline, berke))\nforall x (Sour(x, nannette) and Exact(nannette) -> Caper(x, alexandra))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Caper(x, alexandra))\nforall x (Sour(x, micheline) and Interbreed(x, nannette) -> not Caper(micheline, alexandra))\nforall x (Sour(x, micheline) -> Beseeching(micheline))\n\nInterbreed(berke, micheline)\n\ntherefore Interbreed(berke, micheline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The willi is singable. The lyndsie is not multiplied. The malia is multiplied. The stacee ready the lyndsie. The stacee clog the willi. The stacee shape the willi. The stacee shape the malia. If someone ready the willi then the willi clog the lyndsie. If the lyndsie shape the stacee then the lyndsie is wiry. If someone is multiplied and they visit the stacee then the stacee shape the malia. If someone ready the lyndsie then the lyndsie shape the stacee. If someone clog the willi and the willi is singable then they visit the malia. If someone is wiry then they visit the malia. If someone clog the lyndsie and they chase the willi then the lyndsie does not visit the malia. If someone clog the lyndsie then the lyndsie is besprent. The stacee does not visit the malia.", "logic": "\nSingable(willi)\nnot Multiplied(lyndsie)\nMultiplied(malia)\nReady(stacee, lyndsie)\nClog(stacee, willi)\nShape(stacee, willi)\nShape(stacee, malia)\nforall x (Ready(x, willi) -> Clog(willi, lyndsie))\nShape(lyndsie, stacee) -> Wiry(lyndsie)\nforall x (Multiplied(x) and Shape(x, stacee) -> Shape(stacee, malia))\nforall x (Ready(x, lyndsie) -> Shape(lyndsie, stacee))\nforall x (Clog(x, willi) and Singable(willi) -> Shape(x, malia))\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Shape(x, malia))\nforall x (Clog(x, lyndsie) and Ready(x, willi) -> not Shape(lyndsie, malia))\nforall x (Clog(x, lyndsie) -> Besprent(lyndsie))\n\nnot Shape(stacee, malia)\n\ntherefore Shape(stacee, malia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The aldric is unchanged. The andromeda is not faded. The osmond is faded. The jacenta volley the andromeda. The jacenta somersault the aldric. The jacenta exhale the aldric. The jacenta exhale the osmond. If someone volley the aldric then the aldric somersault the andromeda. If the andromeda exhale the jacenta then the andromeda is astral. If someone is faded and they visit the jacenta then the jacenta exhale the osmond. If someone volley the andromeda then the andromeda exhale the jacenta. If someone somersault the aldric and the aldric is unchanged then they visit the osmond. If someone is astral then they visit the osmond. If someone somersault the andromeda and they chase the aldric then the andromeda does not visit the osmond. If someone somersault the andromeda then the andromeda is other. The andromeda exhale the jacenta.", "logic": "\nUnchanged(aldric)\nnot Faded(andromeda)\nFaded(osmond)\nVolley(jacenta, andromeda)\nSomersault(jacenta, aldric)\nExhale(jacenta, aldric)\nExhale(jacenta, osmond)\nforall x (Volley(x, aldric) -> Somersault(aldric, andromeda))\nExhale(andromeda, jacenta) -> Astral(andromeda)\nforall x (Faded(x) and Exhale(x, jacenta) -> Exhale(jacenta, osmond))\nforall x (Volley(x, andromeda) -> Exhale(andromeda, jacenta))\nforall x (Somersault(x, aldric) and Unchanged(aldric) -> Exhale(x, osmond))\nforall x (Astral(x) -> Exhale(x, osmond))\nforall x (Somersault(x, andromeda) and Volley(x, aldric) -> not Exhale(andromeda, osmond))\nforall x (Somersault(x, andromeda) -> Other(andromeda))\n\nExhale(andromeda, jacenta)\n\nVolley(jacenta, andromeda) and forall x (Volley(x, andromeda) -> Exhale(andromeda, jacenta)) -> therefore Exhale(andromeda, jacenta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The joel is quaternary. The catha is not sandy. The jennifer is sandy. The jordana copy the catha. The jordana appeal the joel. The jordana harm the joel. The jordana harm the jennifer. If someone copy the joel then the joel appeal the catha. If the catha harm the jordana then the catha is intramural. If someone is sandy and they visit the jordana then the jordana harm the jennifer. If someone copy the catha then the catha harm the jordana. If someone appeal the joel and the joel is quaternary then they visit the jennifer. If someone is intramural then they visit the jennifer. If someone appeal the catha and they chase the joel then the catha does not visit the jennifer. If someone appeal the catha then the catha is bifoliate. The catha does not visit the jordana.", "logic": "\nQuaternary(joel)\nnot Sandy(catha)\nSandy(jennifer)\nCopy(jordana, catha)\nAppeal(jordana, joel)\nHarm(jordana, joel)\nHarm(jordana, jennifer)\nforall x (Copy(x, joel) -> Appeal(joel, catha))\nHarm(catha, jordana) -> Intramural(catha)\nforall x (Sandy(x) and Harm(x, jordana) -> Harm(jordana, jennifer))\nforall x (Copy(x, catha) -> Harm(catha, jordana))\nforall x (Appeal(x, joel) and Quaternary(joel) -> Harm(x, jennifer))\nforall x (Intramural(x) -> Harm(x, jennifer))\nforall x (Appeal(x, catha) and Copy(x, joel) -> not Harm(catha, jennifer))\nforall x (Appeal(x, catha) -> Bifoliate(catha))\n\nnot Harm(catha, jordana)\n\nCopy(jordana, catha) and forall x (Copy(x, catha) -> Harm(catha, jordana)) -> therefore Harm(catha, jordana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The kaia is masted. The odie is not initiatory. The max is initiatory. The josefa suborn the odie. The josefa outstrip the kaia. The josefa outsource the kaia. The josefa outsource the max. If someone suborn the kaia then the kaia outstrip the odie. If the odie outsource the josefa then the odie is somnific. If someone is initiatory and they visit the josefa then the josefa outsource the max. If someone suborn the odie then the odie outsource the josefa. If someone outstrip the kaia and the kaia is masted then they visit the max. If someone is somnific then they visit the max. If someone outstrip the odie and they chase the kaia then the odie does not visit the max. If someone outstrip the odie then the odie is alien. The odie is somnific.", "logic": "\nMasted(kaia)\nnot Initiatory(odie)\nInitiatory(max)\nSuborn(josefa, odie)\nOutstrip(josefa, kaia)\nOutsource(josefa, kaia)\nOutsource(josefa, max)\nforall x (Suborn(x, kaia) -> Outstrip(kaia, odie))\nOutsource(odie, josefa) -> Somnific(odie)\nforall x (Initiatory(x) and Outsource(x, josefa) -> Outsource(josefa, max))\nforall x (Suborn(x, odie) -> Outsource(odie, josefa))\nforall x (Outstrip(x, kaia) and Masted(kaia) -> Outsource(x, max))\nforall x (Somnific(x) -> Outsource(x, max))\nforall x (Outstrip(x, odie) and Suborn(x, kaia) -> not Outsource(odie, max))\nforall x (Outstrip(x, odie) -> Alien(odie))\n\nSomnific(odie)\n\nSuborn(josefa, odie) and forall x (Suborn(x, odie) -> Outsource(odie, josefa)) -> therefore Outsource(odie, josefa) Outsource(odie, josefa) and Outsource(odie, josefa) -> Somnific(odie) -> therefore Somnific(odie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The jacob is thinking. The mirabella is not unaffected. The benjamen is unaffected. The morty calm the mirabella. The morty recapture the jacob. The morty chevy the jacob. The morty chevy the benjamen. If someone calm the jacob then the jacob recapture the mirabella. If the mirabella chevy the morty then the mirabella is female. If someone is unaffected and they visit the morty then the morty chevy the benjamen. If someone calm the mirabella then the mirabella chevy the morty. If someone recapture the jacob and the jacob is thinking then they visit the benjamen. If someone is female then they visit the benjamen. If someone recapture the mirabella and they chase the jacob then the mirabella does not visit the benjamen. If someone recapture the mirabella then the mirabella is obtainable. The mirabella is not female.", "logic": "\nThinking(jacob)\nnot Unaffected(mirabella)\nUnaffected(benjamen)\nCalm(morty, mirabella)\nRecapture(morty, jacob)\nChevy(morty, jacob)\nChevy(morty, benjamen)\nforall x (Calm(x, jacob) -> Recapture(jacob, mirabella))\nChevy(mirabella, morty) -> Female(mirabella)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and Chevy(x, morty) -> Chevy(morty, benjamen))\nforall x (Calm(x, mirabella) -> Chevy(mirabella, morty))\nforall x (Recapture(x, jacob) and Thinking(jacob) -> Chevy(x, benjamen))\nforall x (Female(x) -> Chevy(x, benjamen))\nforall x (Recapture(x, mirabella) and Calm(x, jacob) -> not Chevy(mirabella, benjamen))\nforall x (Recapture(x, mirabella) -> Obtainable(mirabella))\n\nnot Female(mirabella)\n\nCalm(morty, mirabella) and forall x (Calm(x, mirabella) -> Chevy(mirabella, morty)) -> therefore Chevy(mirabella, morty) Chevy(mirabella, morty) and Chevy(mirabella, morty) -> Female(mirabella) -> therefore Female(mirabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The aridatha is unusual. The abigale is not cervine. The antoni is cervine. The napoleon attenuate the abigale. The napoleon rock the aridatha. The napoleon misaddress the aridatha. The napoleon misaddress the antoni. If someone attenuate the aridatha then the aridatha rock the abigale. If the abigale misaddress the napoleon then the abigale is degressive. If someone is cervine and they visit the napoleon then the napoleon misaddress the antoni. If someone attenuate the abigale then the abigale misaddress the napoleon. If someone rock the aridatha and the aridatha is unusual then they visit the antoni. If someone is degressive then they visit the antoni. If someone rock the abigale and they chase the aridatha then the abigale does not visit the antoni. If someone rock the abigale then the abigale is unsightly. The abigale misaddress the antoni.", "logic": "\nUnusual(aridatha)\nnot Cervine(abigale)\nCervine(antoni)\nAttenuate(napoleon, abigale)\nRock(napoleon, aridatha)\nMisaddress(napoleon, aridatha)\nMisaddress(napoleon, antoni)\nforall x (Attenuate(x, aridatha) -> Rock(aridatha, abigale))\nMisaddress(abigale, napoleon) -> Degressive(abigale)\nforall x (Cervine(x) and Misaddress(x, napoleon) -> Misaddress(napoleon, antoni))\nforall x (Attenuate(x, abigale) -> Misaddress(abigale, napoleon))\nforall x (Rock(x, aridatha) and Unusual(aridatha) -> Misaddress(x, antoni))\nforall x (Degressive(x) -> Misaddress(x, antoni))\nforall x (Rock(x, abigale) and Attenuate(x, aridatha) -> not Misaddress(abigale, antoni))\nforall x (Rock(x, abigale) -> Unsightly(abigale))\n\nMisaddress(abigale, antoni)\n\nAttenuate(napoleon, abigale) and forall x (Attenuate(x, abigale) -> Misaddress(abigale, napoleon)) -> therefore Misaddress(abigale, napoleon) Misaddress(abigale, napoleon) and Misaddress(abigale, napoleon) -> Degressive(abigale) -> therefore Degressive(abigale) Degressive(abigale) and forall x (Degressive(x) -> Misaddress(x, antoni)) -> therefore Misaddress(abigale, antoni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The ugo is gimpy. The adriaens is not enhanced. The phyllida is enhanced. The veronike expel the adriaens. The veronike mimeo the ugo. The veronike hale the ugo. The veronike hale the phyllida. If someone expel the ugo then the ugo mimeo the adriaens. If the adriaens hale the veronike then the adriaens is pursuing. If someone is enhanced and they visit the veronike then the veronike hale the phyllida. If someone expel the adriaens then the adriaens hale the veronike. If someone mimeo the ugo and the ugo is gimpy then they visit the phyllida. If someone is pursuing then they visit the phyllida. If someone mimeo the adriaens and they chase the ugo then the adriaens does not visit the phyllida. If someone mimeo the adriaens then the adriaens is jacobinic. The adriaens does not visit the phyllida.", "logic": "\nGimpy(ugo)\nnot Enhanced(adriaens)\nEnhanced(phyllida)\nExpel(veronike, adriaens)\nMimeo(veronike, ugo)\nHale(veronike, ugo)\nHale(veronike, phyllida)\nforall x (Expel(x, ugo) -> Mimeo(ugo, adriaens))\nHale(adriaens, veronike) -> Pursuing(adriaens)\nforall x (Enhanced(x) and Hale(x, veronike) -> Hale(veronike, phyllida))\nforall x (Expel(x, adriaens) -> Hale(adriaens, veronike))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, ugo) and Gimpy(ugo) -> Hale(x, phyllida))\nforall x (Pursuing(x) -> Hale(x, phyllida))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, adriaens) and Expel(x, ugo) -> not Hale(adriaens, phyllida))\nforall x (Mimeo(x, adriaens) -> Jacobinic(adriaens))\n\nnot Hale(adriaens, phyllida)\n\nExpel(veronike, adriaens) and forall x (Expel(x, adriaens) -> Hale(adriaens, veronike)) -> therefore Hale(adriaens, veronike) Hale(adriaens, veronike) and Hale(adriaens, veronike) -> Pursuing(adriaens) -> therefore Pursuing(adriaens) Pursuing(adriaens) and forall x (Pursuing(x) -> Hale(x, phyllida)) -> therefore Hale(adriaens, phyllida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The casey is boeotian. The bridie is not iridic. The julieta is iridic. The winthrop cling the bridie. The winthrop cackle the casey. The winthrop bestialise the casey. The winthrop bestialise the julieta. If someone cling the casey then the casey cackle the bridie. If the bridie bestialise the winthrop then the bridie is literal. If someone is iridic and they visit the winthrop then the winthrop bestialise the julieta. If someone cling the bridie then the bridie bestialise the winthrop. If someone cackle the casey and the casey is boeotian then they visit the julieta. If someone is literal then they visit the julieta. If someone cackle the bridie and they chase the casey then the bridie does not visit the julieta. If someone cackle the bridie then the bridie is south. The casey does not like the bridie.", "logic": "\nBoeotian(casey)\nnot Iridic(bridie)\nIridic(julieta)\nCling(winthrop, bridie)\nCackle(winthrop, casey)\nBestialise(winthrop, casey)\nBestialise(winthrop, julieta)\nforall x (Cling(x, casey) -> Cackle(casey, bridie))\nBestialise(bridie, winthrop) -> Literal(bridie)\nforall x (Iridic(x) and Bestialise(x, winthrop) -> Bestialise(winthrop, julieta))\nforall x (Cling(x, bridie) -> Bestialise(bridie, winthrop))\nforall x (Cackle(x, casey) and Boeotian(casey) -> Bestialise(x, julieta))\nforall x (Literal(x) -> Bestialise(x, julieta))\nforall x (Cackle(x, bridie) and Cling(x, casey) -> not Bestialise(bridie, julieta))\nforall x (Cackle(x, bridie) -> South(bridie))\n\nnot Cackle(casey, bridie)\n\nforall x (Cling(x, casey) -> Cackle(casey, bridie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The darlene is planktonic. The rolland is not august. The mada is august. The tarra sovietise the rolland. The tarra barbarize the darlene. The tarra construct the darlene. The tarra construct the mada. If someone sovietise the darlene then the darlene barbarize the rolland. If the rolland construct the tarra then the rolland is pneumonic. If someone is august and they visit the tarra then the tarra construct the mada. If someone sovietise the rolland then the rolland construct the tarra. If someone barbarize the darlene and the darlene is planktonic then they visit the mada. If someone is pneumonic then they visit the mada. If someone barbarize the rolland and they chase the darlene then the rolland does not visit the mada. If someone barbarize the rolland then the rolland is preemptive. The rolland is preemptive.", "logic": "\nPlanktonic(darlene)\nnot August(rolland)\nAugust(mada)\nSovietise(tarra, rolland)\nBarbarize(tarra, darlene)\nConstruct(tarra, darlene)\nConstruct(tarra, mada)\nforall x (Sovietise(x, darlene) -> Barbarize(darlene, rolland))\nConstruct(rolland, tarra) -> Pneumonic(rolland)\nforall x (August(x) and Construct(x, tarra) -> Construct(tarra, mada))\nforall x (Sovietise(x, rolland) -> Construct(rolland, tarra))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, darlene) and Planktonic(darlene) -> Construct(x, mada))\nforall x (Pneumonic(x) -> Construct(x, mada))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, rolland) and Sovietise(x, darlene) -> not Construct(rolland, mada))\nforall x (Barbarize(x, rolland) -> Preemptive(rolland))\n\nPreemptive(rolland)\n\nforall x (Barbarize(x, rolland) -> Preemptive(rolland)) <- forall x (Sovietise(x, darlene) -> Barbarize(darlene, rolland)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The debra is curdled. The jenna is not separated. The gavrielle is separated. The crystie anatomize the jenna. The crystie opine the debra. The crystie vulgarise the debra. The crystie vulgarise the gavrielle. If someone anatomize the debra then the debra opine the jenna. If the jenna vulgarise the crystie then the jenna is grandiose. If someone is separated and they visit the crystie then the crystie vulgarise the gavrielle. If someone anatomize the jenna then the jenna vulgarise the crystie. If someone opine the debra and the debra is curdled then they visit the gavrielle. If someone is grandiose then they visit the gavrielle. If someone opine the jenna and they chase the debra then the jenna does not visit the gavrielle. If someone opine the jenna then the jenna is covalent. The debra does not visit the gavrielle.", "logic": "\nCurdled(debra)\nnot Separated(jenna)\nSeparated(gavrielle)\nAnatomize(crystie, jenna)\nOpine(crystie, debra)\nVulgarise(crystie, debra)\nVulgarise(crystie, gavrielle)\nforall x (Anatomize(x, debra) -> Opine(debra, jenna))\nVulgarise(jenna, crystie) -> Grandiose(jenna)\nforall x (Separated(x) and Vulgarise(x, crystie) -> Vulgarise(crystie, gavrielle))\nforall x (Anatomize(x, jenna) -> Vulgarise(jenna, crystie))\nforall x (Opine(x, debra) and Curdled(debra) -> Vulgarise(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Grandiose(x) -> Vulgarise(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Opine(x, jenna) and Anatomize(x, debra) -> not Vulgarise(jenna, gavrielle))\nforall x (Opine(x, jenna) -> Covalent(jenna))\n\nnot Vulgarise(debra, gavrielle)\n\nforall x (Opine(x, debra) and Curdled(debra) -> Vulgarise(x, gavrielle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The emelyne is incestuous. The reuben is not unplayable. The peter is unplayable. The maisey bewhisker the reuben. The maisey fossilise the emelyne. The maisey spot the emelyne. The maisey spot the peter. If someone bewhisker the emelyne then the emelyne fossilise the reuben. If the reuben spot the maisey then the reuben is sigmoidal. If someone is unplayable and they visit the maisey then the maisey spot the peter. If someone bewhisker the reuben then the reuben spot the maisey. If someone fossilise the emelyne and the emelyne is incestuous then they visit the peter. If someone is sigmoidal then they visit the peter. If someone fossilise the reuben and they chase the emelyne then the reuben does not visit the peter. If someone fossilise the reuben then the reuben is razorback. The peter spot the peter.", "logic": "\nIncestuous(emelyne)\nnot Unplayable(reuben)\nUnplayable(peter)\nBewhisker(maisey, reuben)\nFossilise(maisey, emelyne)\nSpot(maisey, emelyne)\nSpot(maisey, peter)\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, emelyne) -> Fossilise(emelyne, reuben))\nSpot(reuben, maisey) -> Sigmoidal(reuben)\nforall x (Unplayable(x) and Spot(x, maisey) -> Spot(maisey, peter))\nforall x (Bewhisker(x, reuben) -> Spot(reuben, maisey))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, emelyne) and Incestuous(emelyne) -> Spot(x, peter))\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) -> Spot(x, peter))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, reuben) and Bewhisker(x, emelyne) -> not Spot(reuben, peter))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, reuben) -> Razorback(reuben))\n\nSpot(peter, peter)\n\nforall x (Fossilise(x, emelyne) and Incestuous(emelyne) -> Spot(x, peter)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The ruthy is wooly. The elias is not plumping. The hanson is plumping. The berri undeceive the elias. The berri better the ruthy. The berri hate the ruthy. The berri hate the hanson. If someone undeceive the ruthy then the ruthy better the elias. If the elias hate the berri then the elias is unnoted. If someone is plumping and they visit the berri then the berri hate the hanson. If someone undeceive the elias then the elias hate the berri. If someone better the ruthy and the ruthy is wooly then they visit the hanson. If someone is unnoted then they visit the hanson. If someone better the elias and they chase the ruthy then the elias does not visit the hanson. If someone better the elias then the elias is bigger. The ruthy is not plumping.", "logic": "\nWooly(ruthy)\nnot Plumping(elias)\nPlumping(hanson)\nUndeceive(berri, elias)\nBetter(berri, ruthy)\nHate(berri, ruthy)\nHate(berri, hanson)\nforall x (Undeceive(x, ruthy) -> Better(ruthy, elias))\nHate(elias, berri) -> Unnoted(elias)\nforall x (Plumping(x) and Hate(x, berri) -> Hate(berri, hanson))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, elias) -> Hate(elias, berri))\nforall x (Better(x, ruthy) and Wooly(ruthy) -> Hate(x, hanson))\nforall x (Unnoted(x) -> Hate(x, hanson))\nforall x (Better(x, elias) and Undeceive(x, ruthy) -> not Hate(elias, hanson))\nforall x (Better(x, elias) -> Bigger(elias))\n\nnot Plumping(ruthy)\n\nnot Plumping(ruthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The anais is angular. The thayne is not psychical. The nathanil is psychical. The torrence peek the thayne. The torrence absent the anais. The torrence catenate the anais. The torrence catenate the nathanil. If someone peek the anais then the anais absent the thayne. If the thayne catenate the torrence then the thayne is calumnious. If someone is psychical and they visit the torrence then the torrence catenate the nathanil. If someone peek the thayne then the thayne catenate the torrence. If someone absent the anais and the anais is angular then they visit the nathanil. If someone is calumnious then they visit the nathanil. If someone absent the thayne and they chase the anais then the thayne does not visit the nathanil. If someone absent the thayne then the thayne is sarawakian. The thayne absent the anais.", "logic": "\nAngular(anais)\nnot Psychical(thayne)\nPsychical(nathanil)\nPeek(torrence, thayne)\nAbsent(torrence, anais)\nCatenate(torrence, anais)\nCatenate(torrence, nathanil)\nforall x (Peek(x, anais) -> Absent(anais, thayne))\nCatenate(thayne, torrence) -> Calumnious(thayne)\nforall x (Psychical(x) and Catenate(x, torrence) -> Catenate(torrence, nathanil))\nforall x (Peek(x, thayne) -> Catenate(thayne, torrence))\nforall x (Absent(x, anais) and Angular(anais) -> Catenate(x, nathanil))\nforall x (Calumnious(x) -> Catenate(x, nathanil))\nforall x (Absent(x, thayne) and Peek(x, anais) -> not Catenate(thayne, nathanil))\nforall x (Absent(x, thayne) -> Sarawakian(thayne))\n\nAbsent(thayne, anais)\n\nAbsent(thayne, anais) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The clay is pending. The melinde is not paranasal. The wylie is paranasal. The lela overstate the melinde. The lela dyke the clay. The lela puff the clay. The lela puff the wylie. If someone overstate the clay then the clay dyke the melinde. If the melinde puff the lela then the melinde is unrenewed. If someone is paranasal and they visit the lela then the lela puff the wylie. If someone overstate the melinde then the melinde puff the lela. If someone dyke the clay and the clay is pending then they visit the wylie. If someone is unrenewed then they visit the wylie. If someone dyke the melinde and they chase the clay then the melinde does not visit the wylie. If someone dyke the melinde then the melinde is twelfth. The lela does not chase the clay.", "logic": "\nPending(clay)\nnot Paranasal(melinde)\nParanasal(wylie)\nOverstate(lela, melinde)\nDyke(lela, clay)\nPuff(lela, clay)\nPuff(lela, wylie)\nforall x (Overstate(x, clay) -> Dyke(clay, melinde))\nPuff(melinde, lela) -> Unrenewed(melinde)\nforall x (Paranasal(x) and Puff(x, lela) -> Puff(lela, wylie))\nforall x (Overstate(x, melinde) -> Puff(melinde, lela))\nforall x (Dyke(x, clay) and Pending(clay) -> Puff(x, wylie))\nforall x (Unrenewed(x) -> Puff(x, wylie))\nforall x (Dyke(x, melinde) and Overstate(x, clay) -> not Puff(melinde, wylie))\nforall x (Dyke(x, melinde) -> Twelfth(melinde))\n\nnot Overstate(lela, clay)\n\nnot Overstate(lela, clay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "The jarvis is scandent. The randal is not amebous. The tomasina is amebous. The cayla propagate the randal. The cayla shake the jarvis. The cayla brag the jarvis. The cayla brag the tomasina. If someone propagate the jarvis then the jarvis shake the randal. If the randal brag the cayla then the randal is gabby. If someone is amebous and they visit the cayla then the cayla brag the tomasina. If someone propagate the randal then the randal brag the cayla. If someone shake the jarvis and the jarvis is scandent then they visit the tomasina. If someone is gabby then they visit the tomasina. If someone shake the randal and they chase the jarvis then the randal does not visit the tomasina. If someone shake the randal then the randal is invincible. The cayla shake the tomasina.", "logic": "\nScandent(jarvis)\nnot Amebous(randal)\nAmebous(tomasina)\nPropagate(cayla, randal)\nShake(cayla, jarvis)\nBrag(cayla, jarvis)\nBrag(cayla, tomasina)\nforall x (Propagate(x, jarvis) -> Shake(jarvis, randal))\nBrag(randal, cayla) -> Gabby(randal)\nforall x (Amebous(x) and Brag(x, cayla) -> Brag(cayla, tomasina))\nforall x (Propagate(x, randal) -> Brag(randal, cayla))\nforall x (Shake(x, jarvis) and Scandent(jarvis) -> Brag(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Gabby(x) -> Brag(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Shake(x, randal) and Propagate(x, jarvis) -> not Brag(randal, tomasina))\nforall x (Shake(x, randal) -> Invincible(randal))\n\nShake(cayla, tomasina)\n\nShake(cayla, tomasina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-88"} {"premises": "Sharai is budgetary. Sharai is unlivable. Sharai is cogitative. Sharai is secret. Elayne is squeamish. Elayne is budgetary. Elayne is unlivable. Hope is prongy. Hope is squeamish. Hope is unlivable. If someone is budgetary then they are secret. If someone is unlivable then they are redheaded. Quiet, secret people are squeamish. Elayne is budgetary.", "logic": "\nBudgetary(sharai)\nUnlivable(sharai)\nCogitative(sharai)\nSecret(sharai)\nSqueamish(elayne)\nBudgetary(elayne)\nUnlivable(elayne)\nProngy(hope)\nSqueamish(hope)\nUnlivable(hope)\nforall x (Budgetary(x) -> Secret(x))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) -> Redheaded(x))\nforall x (Redheaded(x) and Secret(x) -> Squeamish(x))\n\nBudgetary(elayne)\n\ntherefore Budgetary(elayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Oral is nugatory. Oral is protrusile. Oral is satisfying. Oral is mixed. Ollie is cosmogenic. Ollie is nugatory. Ollie is protrusile. Jonathon is vivacious. Jonathon is cosmogenic. Jonathon is protrusile. If someone is nugatory then they are mixed. If someone is protrusile then they are baptistic. Quiet, mixed people are cosmogenic. Ollie is not protrusile.", "logic": "\nNugatory(oral)\nProtrusile(oral)\nSatisfying(oral)\nMixed(oral)\nCosmogenic(ollie)\nNugatory(ollie)\nProtrusile(ollie)\nVivacious(jonathon)\nCosmogenic(jonathon)\nProtrusile(jonathon)\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Mixed(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Baptistic(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Mixed(x) -> Cosmogenic(x))\n\nnot Protrusile(ollie)\n\ntherefore Protrusile(ollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Webster is unroofed. Webster is bareback. Webster is limitless. Webster is imperfect. Christin is wedged. Christin is unroofed. Christin is bareback. Deb is razorback. Deb is wedged. Deb is bareback. If someone is unroofed then they are imperfect. If someone is bareback then they are licentious. Quiet, imperfect people are wedged. Webster is licentious.", "logic": "\nUnroofed(webster)\nBareback(webster)\nLimitless(webster)\nImperfect(webster)\nWedged(christin)\nUnroofed(christin)\nBareback(christin)\nRazorback(deb)\nWedged(deb)\nBareback(deb)\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) -> Licentious(x))\nforall x (Licentious(x) and Imperfect(x) -> Wedged(x))\n\nLicentious(webster)\n\nBareback(webster) and forall x (Bareback(x) -> Licentious(x)) -> therefore Licentious(webster)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Elvira is sumptuous. Elvira is meltable. Elvira is meteoritic. Elvira is scaphoid. Sher is expressed. Sher is sumptuous. Sher is meltable. Angelina is sterilised. Angelina is expressed. Angelina is meltable. If someone is sumptuous then they are scaphoid. If someone is meltable then they are mindless. Quiet, scaphoid people are expressed. Sher is not mindless.", "logic": "\nSumptuous(elvira)\nMeltable(elvira)\nMeteoritic(elvira)\nScaphoid(elvira)\nExpressed(sher)\nSumptuous(sher)\nMeltable(sher)\nSterilised(angelina)\nExpressed(angelina)\nMeltable(angelina)\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Meltable(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Mindless(x) and Scaphoid(x) -> Expressed(x))\n\nnot Mindless(sher)\n\nMeltable(sher) and forall x (Meltable(x) -> Mindless(x)) -> therefore Mindless(sher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Iseabal is entangled. Iseabal is capricious. Iseabal is withdrawn. Iseabal is deckled. Larisa is soprano. Larisa is entangled. Larisa is capricious. Fidelity is opened. Fidelity is soprano. Fidelity is capricious. If someone is entangled then they are deckled. If someone is capricious then they are dopy. Quiet, deckled people are soprano. Iseabal is soprano.", "logic": "\nEntangled(iseabal)\nCapricious(iseabal)\nWithdrawn(iseabal)\nDeckled(iseabal)\nSoprano(larisa)\nEntangled(larisa)\nCapricious(larisa)\nOpened(fidelity)\nSoprano(fidelity)\nCapricious(fidelity)\nforall x (Entangled(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Capricious(x) -> Dopy(x))\nforall x (Dopy(x) and Deckled(x) -> Soprano(x))\n\nSoprano(iseabal)\n\nCapricious(iseabal) and forall x (Capricious(x) -> Dopy(x)) -> therefore Dopy(iseabal) Dopy(iseabal) and Deckled(iseabal) and forall x (Dopy(x) and Deckled(x) -> Soprano(x)) -> therefore Soprano(iseabal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Freddy is pustulate. Freddy is bewildered. Freddy is auriform. Freddy is nocent. Bernard is specific. Bernard is pustulate. Bernard is bewildered. Nancy is inverted. Nancy is specific. Nancy is bewildered. If someone is pustulate then they are nocent. If someone is bewildered then they are phonemic. Quiet, nocent people are specific. Freddy is not specific.", "logic": "\nPustulate(freddy)\nBewildered(freddy)\nAuriform(freddy)\nNocent(freddy)\nSpecific(bernard)\nPustulate(bernard)\nBewildered(bernard)\nInverted(nancy)\nSpecific(nancy)\nBewildered(nancy)\nforall x (Pustulate(x) -> Nocent(x))\nforall x (Bewildered(x) -> Phonemic(x))\nforall x (Phonemic(x) and Nocent(x) -> Specific(x))\n\nnot Specific(freddy)\n\nBewildered(freddy) and forall x (Bewildered(x) -> Phonemic(x)) -> therefore Phonemic(freddy) Phonemic(freddy) and Nocent(freddy) and forall x (Phonemic(x) and Nocent(x) -> Specific(x)) -> therefore Specific(freddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Sherrie is observing. Sherrie is fattening. Sherrie is unobvious. Sherrie is precursory. Zachery is internal. Zachery is observing. Zachery is fattening. Odella is frostian. Odella is internal. Odella is fattening. If someone is observing then they are precursory. If someone is fattening then they are uplifted. Quiet, precursory people are internal. Odella is not precursory.", "logic": "\nObserving(sherrie)\nFattening(sherrie)\nUnobvious(sherrie)\nPrecursory(sherrie)\nInternal(zachery)\nObserving(zachery)\nFattening(zachery)\nFrostian(odella)\nInternal(odella)\nFattening(odella)\nforall x (Observing(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Fattening(x) -> Uplifted(x))\nforall x (Uplifted(x) and Precursory(x) -> Internal(x))\n\nnot Precursory(odella)\n\nforall x (Observing(x) -> Precursory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Benedikta is overlarge. Benedikta is sheetlike. Benedikta is lxxi. Benedikta is ruined. Wallie is foreign. Wallie is overlarge. Wallie is sheetlike. Vallie is sunstruck. Vallie is foreign. Vallie is sheetlike. If someone is overlarge then they are ruined. If someone is sheetlike then they are mandatory. Quiet, ruined people are foreign. Wallie is sunstruck.", "logic": "\nOverlarge(benedikta)\nSheetlike(benedikta)\nLxxi(benedikta)\nRuined(benedikta)\nForeign(wallie)\nOverlarge(wallie)\nSheetlike(wallie)\nSunstruck(vallie)\nForeign(vallie)\nSheetlike(vallie)\nforall x (Overlarge(x) -> Ruined(x))\nforall x (Sheetlike(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) and Ruined(x) -> Foreign(x))\n\nSunstruck(wallie)\n\nSunstruck(wallie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Robinson is dyspnoeic. Robinson is moody. Robinson is butcherly. Robinson is dystopian. Devon is celluloid. Devon is dyspnoeic. Devon is moody. Keslie is fagged. Keslie is celluloid. Keslie is moody. If someone is dyspnoeic then they are dystopian. If someone is moody then they are biologic. Quiet, dystopian people are celluloid. Keslie is not dyspnoeic.", "logic": "\nDyspnoeic(robinson)\nMoody(robinson)\nButcherly(robinson)\nDystopian(robinson)\nCelluloid(devon)\nDyspnoeic(devon)\nMoody(devon)\nFagged(keslie)\nCelluloid(keslie)\nMoody(keslie)\nforall x (Dyspnoeic(x) -> Dystopian(x))\nforall x (Moody(x) -> Biologic(x))\nforall x (Biologic(x) and Dystopian(x) -> Celluloid(x))\n\nnot Dyspnoeic(keslie)\n\nnot Dyspnoeic(keslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Gino is cheesy. Gino is tyrolean. Gino is vacillant. Gino is resistless. Jeremiah is epidural. Jeremiah is cheesy. Jeremiah is tyrolean. Nadia is abject. Nadia is epidural. Nadia is tyrolean. If someone is cheesy then they are resistless. If someone is tyrolean then they are splenetic. Quiet, resistless people are epidural. Gino is abject.", "logic": "\nCheesy(gino)\nTyrolean(gino)\nVacillant(gino)\nResistless(gino)\nEpidural(jeremiah)\nCheesy(jeremiah)\nTyrolean(jeremiah)\nAbject(nadia)\nEpidural(nadia)\nTyrolean(nadia)\nforall x (Cheesy(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Tyrolean(x) -> Splenetic(x))\nforall x (Splenetic(x) and Resistless(x) -> Epidural(x))\n\nAbject(gino)\n\nAbject(gino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Mathilde is ordinary. Mathilde is immemorial. Mathilde is ripened. Mathilde is cupric. Zane is anamnestic. Zane is ordinary. Zane is immemorial. Iris is homeless. Iris is anamnestic. Iris is immemorial. If someone is ordinary then they are cupric. If someone is immemorial then they are hedonistic. Quiet, cupric people are anamnestic. Iris is not ripened.", "logic": "\nOrdinary(mathilde)\nImmemorial(mathilde)\nRipened(mathilde)\nCupric(mathilde)\nAnamnestic(zane)\nOrdinary(zane)\nImmemorial(zane)\nHomeless(iris)\nAnamnestic(iris)\nImmemorial(iris)\nforall x (Ordinary(x) -> Cupric(x))\nforall x (Immemorial(x) -> Hedonistic(x))\nforall x (Hedonistic(x) and Cupric(x) -> Anamnestic(x))\n\nnot Ripened(iris)\n\nnot Ripened(iris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Kimberlee is stinting. Kimberlee is unrefined. Kimberlee is boytrose. Kimberlee is roomy. Nancy is autonomous. Nancy is stinting. Nancy is unrefined. Lolande is suborbital. Lolande is autonomous. Lolande is unrefined. If someone is stinting then they are roomy. If someone is unrefined then they are fetid. Quiet, roomy people are autonomous. Nancy is boytrose.", "logic": "\nStinting(kimberlee)\nUnrefined(kimberlee)\nBoytrose(kimberlee)\nRoomy(kimberlee)\nAutonomous(nancy)\nStinting(nancy)\nUnrefined(nancy)\nSuborbital(lolande)\nAutonomous(lolande)\nUnrefined(lolande)\nforall x (Stinting(x) -> Roomy(x))\nforall x (Unrefined(x) -> Fetid(x))\nforall x (Fetid(x) and Roomy(x) -> Autonomous(x))\n\nBoytrose(nancy)\n\nBoytrose(nancy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2261"} {"premises": "Welsh is mailed. Rozanne is reflecting. Ketti is holistic. Eli is not lush. If Eli is polygynous and Eli is not holistic then Eli is reflecting. If someone is polygynous then they are dermic. All reflecting people are polygynous. If Eli is mailed and Eli is not holistic then Eli is antennary. All mailed, antennary people are lush. All holistic, reflecting people are antennary. If someone is mailed and not dermic then they are antennary. All dermic people are not antennary. Rozanne is reflecting.", "logic": "\nMailed(welsh)\nReflecting(rozanne)\nHolistic(ketti)\nnot Lush(eli)\nPolygynous(eli) and not Holistic(eli) -> Reflecting(eli)\nforall x (Polygynous(x) -> Dermic(x))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Polygynous(x))\nMailed(eli) and not Holistic(eli) -> Antennary(eli)\nforall x (Mailed(x) and Antennary(x) -> Lush(x))\nforall x (Holistic(x) and Reflecting(x) -> Antennary(x))\nforall x (Mailed(x) and not Dermic(x) -> Antennary(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> not Antennary(x))\n\nReflecting(rozanne)\n\ntherefore Reflecting(rozanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Norine is westmost. Montague is diestrual. Talya is unmalted. Nicholle is not aldermanic. If Nicholle is haggard and Nicholle is not unmalted then Nicholle is diestrual. If someone is haggard then they are imputable. All diestrual people are haggard. If Nicholle is westmost and Nicholle is not unmalted then Nicholle is bent. All westmost, bent people are aldermanic. All unmalted, diestrual people are bent. If someone is westmost and not imputable then they are bent. All imputable people are not bent. Nicholle is aldermanic.", "logic": "\nWestmost(norine)\nDiestrual(montague)\nUnmalted(talya)\nnot Aldermanic(nicholle)\nHaggard(nicholle) and not Unmalted(nicholle) -> Diestrual(nicholle)\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Imputable(x))\nforall x (Diestrual(x) -> Haggard(x))\nWestmost(nicholle) and not Unmalted(nicholle) -> Bent(nicholle)\nforall x (Westmost(x) and Bent(x) -> Aldermanic(x))\nforall x (Unmalted(x) and Diestrual(x) -> Bent(x))\nforall x (Westmost(x) and not Imputable(x) -> Bent(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> not Bent(x))\n\nAldermanic(nicholle)\n\ntherefore not Aldermanic(nicholle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Bernard is wonderful. Natalee is teased. Flore is arcane. Bee is not granitic. If Bee is gnarly and Bee is not arcane then Bee is teased. If someone is gnarly then they are oppositive. All teased people are gnarly. If Bee is wonderful and Bee is not arcane then Bee is bladelike. All wonderful, bladelike people are granitic. All arcane, teased people are bladelike. If someone is wonderful and not oppositive then they are bladelike. All oppositive people are not bladelike. Natalee is gnarly.", "logic": "\nWonderful(bernard)\nTeased(natalee)\nArcane(flore)\nnot Granitic(bee)\nGnarly(bee) and not Arcane(bee) -> Teased(bee)\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Teased(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nWonderful(bee) and not Arcane(bee) -> Bladelike(bee)\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and Bladelike(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Teased(x) -> Bladelike(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and not Oppositive(x) -> Bladelike(x))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) -> not Bladelike(x))\n\nGnarly(natalee)\n\nTeased(natalee) and forall x (Teased(x) -> Gnarly(x)) -> therefore Gnarly(natalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Annamaria is wide. Florri is seeping. Raphaela is trilingual. Jordain is not brimless. If Jordain is proximo and Jordain is not trilingual then Jordain is seeping. If someone is proximo then they are intrastate. All seeping people are proximo. If Jordain is wide and Jordain is not trilingual then Jordain is anatomic. All wide, anatomic people are brimless. All trilingual, seeping people are anatomic. If someone is wide and not intrastate then they are anatomic. All intrastate people are not anatomic. Florri is not proximo.", "logic": "\nWide(annamaria)\nSeeping(florri)\nTrilingual(raphaela)\nnot Brimless(jordain)\nProximo(jordain) and not Trilingual(jordain) -> Seeping(jordain)\nforall x (Proximo(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Seeping(x) -> Proximo(x))\nWide(jordain) and not Trilingual(jordain) -> Anatomic(jordain)\nforall x (Wide(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Brimless(x))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) and Seeping(x) -> Anatomic(x))\nforall x (Wide(x) and not Intrastate(x) -> Anatomic(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) -> not Anatomic(x))\n\nnot Proximo(florri)\n\nSeeping(florri) and forall x (Seeping(x) -> Proximo(x)) -> therefore Proximo(florri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Munroe is fitting. Ethel is eastern. Bruce is abuzz. Darryl is not maimed. If Darryl is viatical and Darryl is not abuzz then Darryl is eastern. If someone is viatical then they are goethian. All eastern people are viatical. If Darryl is fitting and Darryl is not abuzz then Darryl is stooping. All fitting, stooping people are maimed. All abuzz, eastern people are stooping. If someone is fitting and not goethian then they are stooping. All goethian people are not stooping. Ethel is goethian.", "logic": "\nFitting(munroe)\nEastern(ethel)\nAbuzz(bruce)\nnot Maimed(darryl)\nViatical(darryl) and not Abuzz(darryl) -> Eastern(darryl)\nforall x (Viatical(x) -> Goethian(x))\nforall x (Eastern(x) -> Viatical(x))\nFitting(darryl) and not Abuzz(darryl) -> Stooping(darryl)\nforall x (Fitting(x) and Stooping(x) -> Maimed(x))\nforall x (Abuzz(x) and Eastern(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Fitting(x) and not Goethian(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) -> not Stooping(x))\n\nGoethian(ethel)\n\nEastern(ethel) and forall x (Eastern(x) -> Viatical(x)) -> therefore Viatical(ethel) Viatical(ethel) and forall x (Viatical(x) -> Goethian(x)) -> therefore Goethian(ethel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Gaspar is floaty. Krystyna is realistic. Thorndike is rentable. Dottie is not homoecious. If Dottie is doctorial and Dottie is not rentable then Dottie is realistic. If someone is doctorial then they are oversexed. All realistic people are doctorial. If Dottie is floaty and Dottie is not rentable then Dottie is xxxvii. All floaty, xxxvii people are homoecious. All rentable, realistic people are xxxvii. If someone is floaty and not oversexed then they are xxxvii. All oversexed people are not xxxvii. Krystyna is not oversexed.", "logic": "\nFloaty(gaspar)\nRealistic(krystyna)\nRentable(thorndike)\nnot Homoecious(dottie)\nDoctorial(dottie) and not Rentable(dottie) -> Realistic(dottie)\nforall x (Doctorial(x) -> Oversexed(x))\nforall x (Realistic(x) -> Doctorial(x))\nFloaty(dottie) and not Rentable(dottie) -> Xxxvii(dottie)\nforall x (Floaty(x) and Xxxvii(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nforall x (Rentable(x) and Realistic(x) -> Xxxvii(x))\nforall x (Floaty(x) and not Oversexed(x) -> Xxxvii(x))\nforall x (Oversexed(x) -> not Xxxvii(x))\n\nnot Oversexed(krystyna)\n\nRealistic(krystyna) and forall x (Realistic(x) -> Doctorial(x)) -> therefore Doctorial(krystyna) Doctorial(krystyna) and forall x (Doctorial(x) -> Oversexed(x)) -> therefore Oversexed(krystyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Dimitri is unshaken. Lizbeth is acronymous. Fancie is driven. Olive is not splattered. If Olive is despotic and Olive is not driven then Olive is acronymous. If someone is despotic then they are requisite. All acronymous people are despotic. If Olive is unshaken and Olive is not driven then Olive is moony. All unshaken, moony people are splattered. All driven, acronymous people are moony. If someone is unshaken and not requisite then they are moony. All requisite people are not moony. Lizbeth is not moony.", "logic": "\nUnshaken(dimitri)\nAcronymous(lizbeth)\nDriven(fancie)\nnot Splattered(olive)\nDespotic(olive) and not Driven(olive) -> Acronymous(olive)\nforall x (Despotic(x) -> Requisite(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Despotic(x))\nUnshaken(olive) and not Driven(olive) -> Moony(olive)\nforall x (Unshaken(x) and Moony(x) -> Splattered(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Acronymous(x) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) and not Requisite(x) -> Moony(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) -> not Moony(x))\n\nnot Moony(lizbeth)\n\nAcronymous(lizbeth) and forall x (Acronymous(x) -> Despotic(x)) -> therefore Despotic(lizbeth) Despotic(lizbeth) and forall x (Despotic(x) -> Requisite(x)) -> therefore Requisite(lizbeth) Requisite(lizbeth) and forall x (Requisite(x) -> not Moony(x)) -> therefore not Moony(lizbeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Thayne is loosened. Penni is unwoven. Dotty is enlivening. Aloysia is not aquaphobic. If Aloysia is insolent and Aloysia is not enlivening then Aloysia is unwoven. If someone is insolent then they are inquiring. All unwoven people are insolent. If Aloysia is loosened and Aloysia is not enlivening then Aloysia is enclosed. All loosened, enclosed people are aquaphobic. All enlivening, unwoven people are enclosed. If someone is loosened and not inquiring then they are enclosed. All inquiring people are not enclosed. Penni is enclosed.", "logic": "\nLoosened(thayne)\nUnwoven(penni)\nEnlivening(dotty)\nnot Aquaphobic(aloysia)\nInsolent(aloysia) and not Enlivening(aloysia) -> Unwoven(aloysia)\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Inquiring(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> Insolent(x))\nLoosened(aloysia) and not Enlivening(aloysia) -> Enclosed(aloysia)\nforall x (Loosened(x) and Enclosed(x) -> Aquaphobic(x))\nforall x (Enlivening(x) and Unwoven(x) -> Enclosed(x))\nforall x (Loosened(x) and not Inquiring(x) -> Enclosed(x))\nforall x (Inquiring(x) -> not Enclosed(x))\n\nEnclosed(penni)\n\nUnwoven(penni) and forall x (Unwoven(x) -> Insolent(x)) -> therefore Insolent(penni) Insolent(penni) and forall x (Insolent(x) -> Inquiring(x)) -> therefore Inquiring(penni) Inquiring(penni) and forall x (Inquiring(x) -> not Enclosed(x)) -> therefore not Enclosed(penni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Sol is newsworthy. Nelle is oblong. Edeline is humble. Natty is not bashful. If Natty is distaff and Natty is not humble then Natty is oblong. If someone is distaff then they are uncaulked. All oblong people are distaff. If Natty is newsworthy and Natty is not humble then Natty is eclectic. All newsworthy, eclectic people are bashful. All humble, oblong people are eclectic. If someone is newsworthy and not uncaulked then they are eclectic. All uncaulked people are not eclectic. Sol is not uncaulked.", "logic": "\nNewsworthy(sol)\nOblong(nelle)\nHumble(edeline)\nnot Bashful(natty)\nDistaff(natty) and not Humble(natty) -> Oblong(natty)\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Uncaulked(x))\nforall x (Oblong(x) -> Distaff(x))\nNewsworthy(natty) and not Humble(natty) -> Eclectic(natty)\nforall x (Newsworthy(x) and Eclectic(x) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Humble(x) and Oblong(x) -> Eclectic(x))\nforall x (Newsworthy(x) and not Uncaulked(x) -> Eclectic(x))\nforall x (Uncaulked(x) -> not Eclectic(x))\n\nnot Uncaulked(sol)\n\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Uncaulked(x)) <- forall x (Oblong(x) -> Distaff(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Shara is best. Bess is nonionized. Reina is violet. Marcel is not multiplied. If Marcel is omnivorous and Marcel is not violet then Marcel is nonionized. If someone is omnivorous then they are anosmic. All nonionized people are omnivorous. If Marcel is best and Marcel is not violet then Marcel is unskillful. All best, unskillful people are multiplied. All violet, nonionized people are unskillful. If someone is best and not anosmic then they are unskillful. All anosmic people are not unskillful. Shara is multiplied.", "logic": "\nBest(shara)\nNonionized(bess)\nViolet(reina)\nnot Multiplied(marcel)\nOmnivorous(marcel) and not Violet(marcel) -> Nonionized(marcel)\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) -> Anosmic(x))\nforall x (Nonionized(x) -> Omnivorous(x))\nBest(marcel) and not Violet(marcel) -> Unskillful(marcel)\nforall x (Best(x) and Unskillful(x) -> Multiplied(x))\nforall x (Violet(x) and Nonionized(x) -> Unskillful(x))\nforall x (Best(x) and not Anosmic(x) -> Unskillful(x))\nforall x (Anosmic(x) -> not Unskillful(x))\n\nMultiplied(shara)\n\nforall x (Best(x) and Unskillful(x) -> Multiplied(x)) <- forall x (Violet(x) and Nonionized(x) -> Unskillful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Giraud is nonracist. Giffer is numinous. Ximenez is interior. Joaquin is not fulgurant. If Joaquin is stout and Joaquin is not interior then Joaquin is numinous. If someone is stout then they are saleable. All numinous people are stout. If Joaquin is nonracist and Joaquin is not interior then Joaquin is greenhouse. All nonracist, greenhouse people are fulgurant. All interior, numinous people are greenhouse. If someone is nonracist and not saleable then they are greenhouse. All saleable people are not greenhouse. Ximenez is not greenhouse.", "logic": "\nNonracist(giraud)\nNuminous(giffer)\nInterior(ximenez)\nnot Fulgurant(joaquin)\nStout(joaquin) and not Interior(joaquin) -> Numinous(joaquin)\nforall x (Stout(x) -> Saleable(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> Stout(x))\nNonracist(joaquin) and not Interior(joaquin) -> Greenhouse(joaquin)\nforall x (Nonracist(x) and Greenhouse(x) -> Fulgurant(x))\nforall x (Interior(x) and Numinous(x) -> Greenhouse(x))\nforall x (Nonracist(x) and not Saleable(x) -> Greenhouse(x))\nforall x (Saleable(x) -> not Greenhouse(x))\n\nnot Greenhouse(ximenez)\n\nforall x (Interior(x) and Numinous(x) -> Greenhouse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Robbin is thready. Tiffanie is doleful. Hewet is weird. Norman is not laboured. If Norman is ignitable and Norman is not weird then Norman is doleful. If someone is ignitable then they are glottal. All doleful people are ignitable. If Norman is thready and Norman is not weird then Norman is anodal. All thready, anodal people are laboured. All weird, doleful people are anodal. If someone is thready and not glottal then they are anodal. All glottal people are not anodal. Robbin is anodal.", "logic": "\nThready(robbin)\nDoleful(tiffanie)\nWeird(hewet)\nnot Laboured(norman)\nIgnitable(norman) and not Weird(norman) -> Doleful(norman)\nforall x (Ignitable(x) -> Glottal(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Ignitable(x))\nThready(norman) and not Weird(norman) -> Anodal(norman)\nforall x (Thready(x) and Anodal(x) -> Laboured(x))\nforall x (Weird(x) and Doleful(x) -> Anodal(x))\nforall x (Thready(x) and not Glottal(x) -> Anodal(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) -> not Anodal(x))\n\nAnodal(robbin)\n\nforall x (Weird(x) and Doleful(x) -> Anodal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Gretna is outdoor. Bryna is depressed. Wallas is towering. Desiri is not headlong. If Desiri is stoppable and Desiri is not towering then Desiri is depressed. If someone is stoppable then they are affecting. All depressed people are stoppable. If Desiri is outdoor and Desiri is not towering then Desiri is ridiculous. All outdoor, ridiculous people are headlong. All towering, depressed people are ridiculous. If someone is outdoor and not affecting then they are ridiculous. All affecting people are not ridiculous. Bryna is not outdoor.", "logic": "\nOutdoor(gretna)\nDepressed(bryna)\nTowering(wallas)\nnot Headlong(desiri)\nStoppable(desiri) and not Towering(desiri) -> Depressed(desiri)\nforall x (Stoppable(x) -> Affecting(x))\nforall x (Depressed(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nOutdoor(desiri) and not Towering(desiri) -> Ridiculous(desiri)\nforall x (Outdoor(x) and Ridiculous(x) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Towering(x) and Depressed(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Outdoor(x) and not Affecting(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Affecting(x) -> not Ridiculous(x))\n\nnot Outdoor(bryna)\n\nnot Outdoor(bryna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Len is agronomic. Silvester is cutthroat. Jorry is edifying. Emogene is not uncapped. If Emogene is triumphal and Emogene is not edifying then Emogene is cutthroat. If someone is triumphal then they are encircled. All cutthroat people are triumphal. If Emogene is agronomic and Emogene is not edifying then Emogene is humble. All agronomic, humble people are uncapped. All edifying, cutthroat people are humble. If someone is agronomic and not encircled then they are humble. All encircled people are not humble. Len is cutthroat.", "logic": "\nAgronomic(len)\nCutthroat(silvester)\nEdifying(jorry)\nnot Uncapped(emogene)\nTriumphal(emogene) and not Edifying(emogene) -> Cutthroat(emogene)\nforall x (Triumphal(x) -> Encircled(x))\nforall x (Cutthroat(x) -> Triumphal(x))\nAgronomic(emogene) and not Edifying(emogene) -> Humble(emogene)\nforall x (Agronomic(x) and Humble(x) -> Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) and Cutthroat(x) -> Humble(x))\nforall x (Agronomic(x) and not Encircled(x) -> Humble(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) -> not Humble(x))\n\nCutthroat(len)\n\nCutthroat(len) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Jesse is curative. Ellsworth is fernlike. Ginni is visionary. Yancy is not developing. If Yancy is glued and Yancy is not visionary then Yancy is fernlike. If someone is glued then they are prophetic. All fernlike people are glued. If Yancy is curative and Yancy is not visionary then Yancy is rotund. All curative, rotund people are developing. All visionary, fernlike people are rotund. If someone is curative and not prophetic then they are rotund. All prophetic people are not rotund. Ginni is not curative.", "logic": "\nCurative(jesse)\nFernlike(ellsworth)\nVisionary(ginni)\nnot Developing(yancy)\nGlued(yancy) and not Visionary(yancy) -> Fernlike(yancy)\nforall x (Glued(x) -> Prophetic(x))\nforall x (Fernlike(x) -> Glued(x))\nCurative(yancy) and not Visionary(yancy) -> Rotund(yancy)\nforall x (Curative(x) and Rotund(x) -> Developing(x))\nforall x (Visionary(x) and Fernlike(x) -> Rotund(x))\nforall x (Curative(x) and not Prophetic(x) -> Rotund(x))\nforall x (Prophetic(x) -> not Rotund(x))\n\nnot Curative(ginni)\n\nnot Curative(ginni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Berny is rippled. Jolene is turkish. Odessa is suspect. Aurie is not wicked. If Aurie is starchless and Aurie is not suspect then Aurie is turkish. If someone is starchless then they are lonely. All turkish people are starchless. If Aurie is rippled and Aurie is not suspect then Aurie is knockabout. All rippled, knockabout people are wicked. All suspect, turkish people are knockabout. If someone is rippled and not lonely then they are knockabout. All lonely people are not knockabout. Berny is suspect.", "logic": "\nRippled(berny)\nTurkish(jolene)\nSuspect(odessa)\nnot Wicked(aurie)\nStarchless(aurie) and not Suspect(aurie) -> Turkish(aurie)\nforall x (Starchless(x) -> Lonely(x))\nforall x (Turkish(x) -> Starchless(x))\nRippled(aurie) and not Suspect(aurie) -> Knockabout(aurie)\nforall x (Rippled(x) and Knockabout(x) -> Wicked(x))\nforall x (Suspect(x) and Turkish(x) -> Knockabout(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) and not Lonely(x) -> Knockabout(x))\nforall x (Lonely(x) -> not Knockabout(x))\n\nSuspect(berny)\n\nSuspect(berny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-856"} {"premises": "Dorry is voluble. Merrick is not dispersive. Merrick is umbrageous. Merrick is rending. Berke is dispersive. Berke is not enduring. Berke is voluble. Berke is umbrageous. Kraig is emblematic. Kraig is enduring. Kraig is voluble. Kraig is not rending. All voluble, enduring things are umbrageous. If Berke is emblematic then Berke is not umbrageous. If something is voluble and not rending then it is enduring. Kraig is not rending.", "logic": "\nVoluble(dorry)\nnot Dispersive(merrick)\nUmbrageous(merrick)\nRending(merrick)\nDispersive(berke)\nnot Enduring(berke)\nVoluble(berke)\nUmbrageous(berke)\nEmblematic(kraig)\nEnduring(kraig)\nVoluble(kraig)\nnot Rending(kraig)\nforall x (Voluble(x) and Enduring(x) -> Umbrageous(x))\nEmblematic(berke) -> not Umbrageous(berke)\nforall x (Voluble(x) and not Rending(x) -> Enduring(x))\n\nnot Rending(kraig)\n\ntherefore not Rending(kraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "Shanan is semiarid. Marya is not disturbed. Marya is tart. Marya is reticent. Angele is disturbed. Angele is not untidy. Angele is semiarid. Angele is tart. Godart is manifold. Godart is untidy. Godart is semiarid. Godart is not reticent. All semiarid, untidy things are tart. If Angele is manifold then Angele is not tart. If something is semiarid and not reticent then it is untidy. Marya is not reticent.", "logic": "\nSemiarid(shanan)\nnot Disturbed(marya)\nTart(marya)\nReticent(marya)\nDisturbed(angele)\nnot Untidy(angele)\nSemiarid(angele)\nTart(angele)\nManifold(godart)\nUntidy(godart)\nSemiarid(godart)\nnot Reticent(godart)\nforall x (Semiarid(x) and Untidy(x) -> Tart(x))\nManifold(angele) -> not Tart(angele)\nforall x (Semiarid(x) and not Reticent(x) -> Untidy(x))\n\nnot Reticent(marya)\n\ntherefore Reticent(marya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "Adrea is reduced. Lolly is not cyclonal. Lolly is belittled. Lolly is moist. Arnold is cyclonal. Arnold is not shavian. Arnold is reduced. Arnold is belittled. Betta is egotistic. Betta is shavian. Betta is reduced. Betta is not moist. All reduced, shavian things are belittled. If Arnold is egotistic then Arnold is not belittled. If something is reduced and not moist then it is shavian. Betta is belittled.", "logic": "\nReduced(adrea)\nnot Cyclonal(lolly)\nBelittled(lolly)\nMoist(lolly)\nCyclonal(arnold)\nnot Shavian(arnold)\nReduced(arnold)\nBelittled(arnold)\nEgotistic(betta)\nShavian(betta)\nReduced(betta)\nnot Moist(betta)\nforall x (Reduced(x) and Shavian(x) -> Belittled(x))\nEgotistic(arnold) -> not Belittled(arnold)\nforall x (Reduced(x) and not Moist(x) -> Shavian(x))\n\nBelittled(betta)\n\nReduced(betta) and Shavian(betta) and forall x (Reduced(x) and Shavian(x) -> Belittled(x)) -> therefore Belittled(betta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "Aguste is christly. Jeannette is not whatsoever. Jeannette is sabbatical. Jeannette is rhymed. Gail is whatsoever. Gail is not melodic. Gail is christly. Gail is sabbatical. Hayley is carbonous. Hayley is melodic. Hayley is christly. Hayley is not rhymed. All christly, melodic things are sabbatical. If Gail is carbonous then Gail is not sabbatical. If something is christly and not rhymed then it is melodic. Hayley is not sabbatical.", "logic": "\nChristly(aguste)\nnot Whatsoever(jeannette)\nSabbatical(jeannette)\nRhymed(jeannette)\nWhatsoever(gail)\nnot Melodic(gail)\nChristly(gail)\nSabbatical(gail)\nCarbonous(hayley)\nMelodic(hayley)\nChristly(hayley)\nnot Rhymed(hayley)\nforall x (Christly(x) and Melodic(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\nCarbonous(gail) -> not Sabbatical(gail)\nforall x (Christly(x) and not Rhymed(x) -> Melodic(x))\n\nnot Sabbatical(hayley)\n\nChristly(hayley) and Melodic(hayley) and forall x (Christly(x) and Melodic(x) -> Sabbatical(x)) -> therefore Sabbatical(hayley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "Tella is lucent. Mathew is not plentiful. Mathew is unguided. Mathew is coloured. Lane is plentiful. Lane is not diligent. Lane is lucent. Lane is unguided. Orelie is treble. Orelie is diligent. Orelie is lucent. Orelie is not coloured. All lucent, diligent things are unguided. If Lane is treble then Lane is not unguided. If something is lucent and not coloured then it is diligent. Mathew is not diligent.", "logic": "\nLucent(tella)\nnot Plentiful(mathew)\nUnguided(mathew)\nColoured(mathew)\nPlentiful(lane)\nnot Diligent(lane)\nLucent(lane)\nUnguided(lane)\nTreble(orelie)\nDiligent(orelie)\nLucent(orelie)\nnot Coloured(orelie)\nforall x (Lucent(x) and Diligent(x) -> Unguided(x))\nTreble(lane) -> not Unguided(lane)\nforall x (Lucent(x) and not Coloured(x) -> Diligent(x))\n\nnot Diligent(mathew)\n\nforall x (Lucent(x) and not Coloured(x) -> Diligent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "Kit is unionised. Birgitta is not wilful. Birgitta is deflated. Birgitta is bolometric. Elysia is wilful. Elysia is not danish. Elysia is unionised. Elysia is deflated. Zarla is scrofulous. Zarla is danish. Zarla is unionised. Zarla is not bolometric. All unionised, danish things are deflated. If Elysia is scrofulous then Elysia is not deflated. If something is unionised and not bolometric then it is danish. Kit is deflated.", "logic": "\nUnionised(kit)\nnot Wilful(birgitta)\nDeflated(birgitta)\nBolometric(birgitta)\nWilful(elysia)\nnot Danish(elysia)\nUnionised(elysia)\nDeflated(elysia)\nScrofulous(zarla)\nDanish(zarla)\nUnionised(zarla)\nnot Bolometric(zarla)\nforall x (Unionised(x) and Danish(x) -> Deflated(x))\nScrofulous(elysia) -> not Deflated(elysia)\nforall x (Unionised(x) and not Bolometric(x) -> Danish(x))\n\nDeflated(kit)\n\nforall x (Unionised(x) and Danish(x) -> Deflated(x)) <- forall x (Unionised(x) and not Bolometric(x) -> Danish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "Brent is fallow. Maggee is not teachable. Maggee is riveting. Maggee is opulent. Salim is teachable. Salim is not extramural. Salim is fallow. Salim is riveting. Mikey is underdone. Mikey is extramural. Mikey is fallow. Mikey is not opulent. All fallow, extramural things are riveting. If Salim is underdone then Salim is not riveting. If something is fallow and not opulent then it is extramural. Maggee is not underdone.", "logic": "\nFallow(brent)\nnot Teachable(maggee)\nRiveting(maggee)\nOpulent(maggee)\nTeachable(salim)\nnot Extramural(salim)\nFallow(salim)\nRiveting(salim)\nUnderdone(mikey)\nExtramural(mikey)\nFallow(mikey)\nnot Opulent(mikey)\nforall x (Fallow(x) and Extramural(x) -> Riveting(x))\nUnderdone(salim) -> not Riveting(salim)\nforall x (Fallow(x) and not Opulent(x) -> Extramural(x))\n\nnot Underdone(maggee)\n\nnot Underdone(maggee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "Arda is napped. Debera is not obovate. Debera is whimsical. Debera is clean. Sargent is obovate. Sargent is not ecuadorian. Sargent is napped. Sargent is whimsical. Renard is successive. Renard is ecuadorian. Renard is napped. Renard is not clean. All napped, ecuadorian things are whimsical. If Sargent is successive then Sargent is not whimsical. If something is napped and not clean then it is ecuadorian. Arda is clean.", "logic": "\nNapped(arda)\nnot Obovate(debera)\nWhimsical(debera)\nClean(debera)\nObovate(sargent)\nnot Ecuadorian(sargent)\nNapped(sargent)\nWhimsical(sargent)\nSuccessive(renard)\nEcuadorian(renard)\nNapped(renard)\nnot Clean(renard)\nforall x (Napped(x) and Ecuadorian(x) -> Whimsical(x))\nSuccessive(sargent) -> not Whimsical(sargent)\nforall x (Napped(x) and not Clean(x) -> Ecuadorian(x))\n\nClean(arda)\n\nClean(arda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1951"} {"premises": "The ronny does not chase the eda. The ronny cost the madelina. The ronny undeceive the carly. The ronny undeceive the madelina. The ronny is agential. The carly undeceive the ronny. The carly is merciful. The eda fire the ronny. The madelina cost the ronny. The madelina undeceive the carly. If something is synaptic then it fire the madelina. If something undeceive the carly and it is not merciful then the carly cost the ronny. If something cost the madelina then it cost the carly. If the eda is descendant and the eda is not merciful then the eda does not visit the carly. If something undeceive the ronny then it is synaptic. If something fire the carly then the carly is not synaptic. The ronny cost the madelina.", "logic": "\nnot Cost(ronny, eda)\nCost(ronny, madelina)\nUndeceive(ronny, carly)\nUndeceive(ronny, madelina)\nAgential(ronny)\nUndeceive(carly, ronny)\nMerciful(carly)\nFire(eda, ronny)\nCost(madelina, ronny)\nUndeceive(madelina, carly)\nforall x (Synaptic(x) -> Fire(x, madelina))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, carly) and not Merciful(x) -> Cost(carly, ronny))\nforall x (Cost(x, madelina) -> Cost(x, carly))\nDescendant(eda) and not Merciful(eda) -> not Fire(eda, carly)\nforall x (Undeceive(x, ronny) -> Synaptic(x))\nforall x (Fire(x, carly) -> not Synaptic(carly))\n\nCost(ronny, madelina)\n\ntherefore Cost(ronny, madelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The devi does not chase the sydney. The devi denounce the angelico. The devi hoof the havivah. The devi hoof the angelico. The devi is prognathic. The havivah hoof the devi. The havivah is connected. The sydney emasculate the devi. The angelico denounce the devi. The angelico hoof the havivah. If something is subgross then it emasculate the angelico. If something hoof the havivah and it is not connected then the havivah denounce the devi. If something denounce the angelico then it denounce the havivah. If the sydney is connubial and the sydney is not connected then the sydney does not visit the havivah. If something hoof the devi then it is subgross. If something emasculate the havivah then the havivah is not subgross. The angelico does not chase the devi.", "logic": "\nnot Denounce(devi, sydney)\nDenounce(devi, angelico)\nHoof(devi, havivah)\nHoof(devi, angelico)\nPrognathic(devi)\nHoof(havivah, devi)\nConnected(havivah)\nEmasculate(sydney, devi)\nDenounce(angelico, devi)\nHoof(angelico, havivah)\nforall x (Subgross(x) -> Emasculate(x, angelico))\nforall x (Hoof(x, havivah) and not Connected(x) -> Denounce(havivah, devi))\nforall x (Denounce(x, angelico) -> Denounce(x, havivah))\nConnubial(sydney) and not Connected(sydney) -> not Emasculate(sydney, havivah)\nforall x (Hoof(x, devi) -> Subgross(x))\nforall x (Emasculate(x, havivah) -> not Subgross(havivah))\n\nnot Denounce(angelico, devi)\n\ntherefore Denounce(angelico, devi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The caprice does not chase the norry. The caprice wedel the leontyne. The caprice digitalize the marji. The caprice digitalize the leontyne. The caprice is thickset. The marji digitalize the caprice. The marji is beardown. The norry brush the caprice. The leontyne wedel the caprice. The leontyne digitalize the marji. If something is foetal then it brush the leontyne. If something digitalize the marji and it is not beardown then the marji wedel the caprice. If something wedel the leontyne then it wedel the marji. If the norry is hornlike and the norry is not beardown then the norry does not visit the marji. If something digitalize the caprice then it is foetal. If something brush the marji then the marji is not foetal. The caprice wedel the marji.", "logic": "\nnot Wedel(caprice, norry)\nWedel(caprice, leontyne)\nDigitalize(caprice, marji)\nDigitalize(caprice, leontyne)\nThickset(caprice)\nDigitalize(marji, caprice)\nBeardown(marji)\nBrush(norry, caprice)\nWedel(leontyne, caprice)\nDigitalize(leontyne, marji)\nforall x (Foetal(x) -> Brush(x, leontyne))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, marji) and not Beardown(x) -> Wedel(marji, caprice))\nforall x (Wedel(x, leontyne) -> Wedel(x, marji))\nHornlike(norry) and not Beardown(norry) -> not Brush(norry, marji)\nforall x (Digitalize(x, caprice) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Brush(x, marji) -> not Foetal(marji))\n\nWedel(caprice, marji)\n\nWedel(caprice, leontyne) and forall x (Wedel(x, leontyne) -> Wedel(x, marji)) -> therefore Wedel(caprice, marji)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The rennie does not chase the tyrone. The rennie outlaw the ivonne. The rennie want the magdaia. The rennie want the ivonne. The rennie is adust. The magdaia want the rennie. The magdaia is devoid. The tyrone roost the rennie. The ivonne outlaw the rennie. The ivonne want the magdaia. If something is overhand then it roost the ivonne. If something want the magdaia and it is not devoid then the magdaia outlaw the rennie. If something outlaw the ivonne then it outlaw the magdaia. If the tyrone is haematic and the tyrone is not devoid then the tyrone does not visit the magdaia. If something want the rennie then it is overhand. If something roost the magdaia then the magdaia is not overhand. The rennie does not chase the magdaia.", "logic": "\nnot Outlaw(rennie, tyrone)\nOutlaw(rennie, ivonne)\nWant(rennie, magdaia)\nWant(rennie, ivonne)\nAdust(rennie)\nWant(magdaia, rennie)\nDevoid(magdaia)\nRoost(tyrone, rennie)\nOutlaw(ivonne, rennie)\nWant(ivonne, magdaia)\nforall x (Overhand(x) -> Roost(x, ivonne))\nforall x (Want(x, magdaia) and not Devoid(x) -> Outlaw(magdaia, rennie))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, ivonne) -> Outlaw(x, magdaia))\nHaematic(tyrone) and not Devoid(tyrone) -> not Roost(tyrone, magdaia)\nforall x (Want(x, rennie) -> Overhand(x))\nforall x (Roost(x, magdaia) -> not Overhand(magdaia))\n\nnot Outlaw(rennie, magdaia)\n\nOutlaw(rennie, ivonne) and forall x (Outlaw(x, ivonne) -> Outlaw(x, magdaia)) -> therefore Outlaw(rennie, magdaia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The jeffry does not chase the rickie. The jeffry compromise the zachery. The jeffry lube the russell. The jeffry lube the zachery. The jeffry is tops. The russell lube the jeffry. The russell is playable. The rickie uplift the jeffry. The zachery compromise the jeffry. The zachery lube the russell. If something is unhindered then it uplift the zachery. If something lube the russell and it is not playable then the russell compromise the jeffry. If something compromise the zachery then it compromise the russell. If the rickie is asserting and the rickie is not playable then the rickie does not visit the russell. If something lube the jeffry then it is unhindered. If something uplift the russell then the russell is not unhindered. The russell uplift the zachery.", "logic": "\nnot Compromise(jeffry, rickie)\nCompromise(jeffry, zachery)\nLube(jeffry, russell)\nLube(jeffry, zachery)\nTops(jeffry)\nLube(russell, jeffry)\nPlayable(russell)\nUplift(rickie, jeffry)\nCompromise(zachery, jeffry)\nLube(zachery, russell)\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Uplift(x, zachery))\nforall x (Lube(x, russell) and not Playable(x) -> Compromise(russell, jeffry))\nforall x (Compromise(x, zachery) -> Compromise(x, russell))\nAsserting(rickie) and not Playable(rickie) -> not Uplift(rickie, russell)\nforall x (Lube(x, jeffry) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Uplift(x, russell) -> not Unhindered(russell))\n\nUplift(russell, zachery)\n\nLube(russell, jeffry) and forall x (Lube(x, jeffry) -> Unhindered(x)) -> therefore Unhindered(russell) Unhindered(russell) and forall x (Unhindered(x) -> Uplift(x, zachery)) -> therefore Uplift(russell, zachery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The murial does not chase the lena. The murial fair the dulcy. The murial cooper the yaakov. The murial cooper the dulcy. The murial is emotive. The yaakov cooper the murial. The yaakov is seemly. The lena enfold the murial. The dulcy fair the murial. The dulcy cooper the yaakov. If something is unsalted then it enfold the dulcy. If something cooper the yaakov and it is not seemly then the yaakov fair the murial. If something fair the dulcy then it fair the yaakov. If the lena is bryophytic and the lena is not seemly then the lena does not visit the yaakov. If something cooper the murial then it is unsalted. If something enfold the yaakov then the yaakov is not unsalted. The yaakov does not visit the dulcy.", "logic": "\nnot Fair(murial, lena)\nFair(murial, dulcy)\nCooper(murial, yaakov)\nCooper(murial, dulcy)\nEmotive(murial)\nCooper(yaakov, murial)\nSeemly(yaakov)\nEnfold(lena, murial)\nFair(dulcy, murial)\nCooper(dulcy, yaakov)\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> Enfold(x, dulcy))\nforall x (Cooper(x, yaakov) and not Seemly(x) -> Fair(yaakov, murial))\nforall x (Fair(x, dulcy) -> Fair(x, yaakov))\nBryophytic(lena) and not Seemly(lena) -> not Enfold(lena, yaakov)\nforall x (Cooper(x, murial) -> Unsalted(x))\nforall x (Enfold(x, yaakov) -> not Unsalted(yaakov))\n\nnot Enfold(yaakov, dulcy)\n\nCooper(yaakov, murial) and forall x (Cooper(x, murial) -> Unsalted(x)) -> therefore Unsalted(yaakov) Unsalted(yaakov) and forall x (Unsalted(x) -> Enfold(x, dulcy)) -> therefore Enfold(yaakov, dulcy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The nanon does not chase the love. The nanon hulk the madlin. The nanon severalize the elicia. The nanon severalize the madlin. The nanon is undressed. The elicia severalize the nanon. The elicia is pursy. The love preclude the nanon. The madlin hulk the nanon. The madlin severalize the elicia. If something is aciduric then it preclude the madlin. If something severalize the elicia and it is not pursy then the elicia hulk the nanon. If something hulk the madlin then it hulk the elicia. If the love is dutiful and the love is not pursy then the love does not visit the elicia. If something severalize the nanon then it is aciduric. If something preclude the elicia then the elicia is not aciduric. The nanon is not aciduric.", "logic": "\nnot Hulk(nanon, love)\nHulk(nanon, madlin)\nSeveralize(nanon, elicia)\nSeveralize(nanon, madlin)\nUndressed(nanon)\nSeveralize(elicia, nanon)\nPursy(elicia)\nPreclude(love, nanon)\nHulk(madlin, nanon)\nSeveralize(madlin, elicia)\nforall x (Aciduric(x) -> Preclude(x, madlin))\nforall x (Severalize(x, elicia) and not Pursy(x) -> Hulk(elicia, nanon))\nforall x (Hulk(x, madlin) -> Hulk(x, elicia))\nDutiful(love) and not Pursy(love) -> not Preclude(love, elicia)\nforall x (Severalize(x, nanon) -> Aciduric(x))\nforall x (Preclude(x, elicia) -> not Aciduric(elicia))\n\nnot Aciduric(nanon)\n\nforall x (Severalize(x, nanon) -> Aciduric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The wayland does not chase the beryle. The wayland underspend the fenelia. The wayland kibosh the tally. The wayland kibosh the fenelia. The wayland is unwitting. The tally kibosh the wayland. The tally is unweary. The beryle cloister the wayland. The fenelia underspend the wayland. The fenelia kibosh the tally. If something is fecal then it cloister the fenelia. If something kibosh the tally and it is not unweary then the tally underspend the wayland. If something underspend the fenelia then it underspend the tally. If the beryle is reverse and the beryle is not unweary then the beryle does not visit the tally. If something kibosh the wayland then it is fecal. If something cloister the tally then the tally is not fecal. The fenelia is fecal.", "logic": "\nnot Underspend(wayland, beryle)\nUnderspend(wayland, fenelia)\nKibosh(wayland, tally)\nKibosh(wayland, fenelia)\nUnwitting(wayland)\nKibosh(tally, wayland)\nUnweary(tally)\nCloister(beryle, wayland)\nUnderspend(fenelia, wayland)\nKibosh(fenelia, tally)\nforall x (Fecal(x) -> Cloister(x, fenelia))\nforall x (Kibosh(x, tally) and not Unweary(x) -> Underspend(tally, wayland))\nforall x (Underspend(x, fenelia) -> Underspend(x, tally))\nReverse(beryle) and not Unweary(beryle) -> not Cloister(beryle, tally)\nforall x (Kibosh(x, wayland) -> Fecal(x))\nforall x (Cloister(x, tally) -> not Fecal(tally))\n\nFecal(fenelia)\n\nforall x (Kibosh(x, wayland) -> Fecal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The fritz does not chase the lauralee. The fritz worry the clem. The fritz fizzle the annette. The fritz fizzle the clem. The fritz is stalwart. The annette fizzle the fritz. The annette is hulking. The lauralee examine the fritz. The clem worry the fritz. The clem fizzle the annette. If something is lxxvii then it examine the clem. If something fizzle the annette and it is not hulking then the annette worry the fritz. If something worry the clem then it worry the annette. If the lauralee is nubile and the lauralee is not hulking then the lauralee does not visit the annette. If something fizzle the fritz then it is lxxvii. If something examine the annette then the annette is not lxxvii. The annette does not chase the fritz.", "logic": "\nnot Worry(fritz, lauralee)\nWorry(fritz, clem)\nFizzle(fritz, annette)\nFizzle(fritz, clem)\nStalwart(fritz)\nFizzle(annette, fritz)\nHulking(annette)\nExamine(lauralee, fritz)\nWorry(clem, fritz)\nFizzle(clem, annette)\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Examine(x, clem))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, annette) and not Hulking(x) -> Worry(annette, fritz))\nforall x (Worry(x, clem) -> Worry(x, annette))\nNubile(lauralee) and not Hulking(lauralee) -> not Examine(lauralee, annette)\nforall x (Fizzle(x, fritz) -> Lxxvii(x))\nforall x (Examine(x, annette) -> not Lxxvii(annette))\n\nnot Worry(annette, fritz)\n\nforall x (Fizzle(x, annette) and not Hulking(x) -> Worry(annette, fritz)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The micheline does not chase the isaiah. The micheline criminate the hale. The micheline down the gordan. The micheline down the hale. The micheline is wigless. The gordan down the micheline. The gordan is accordant. The isaiah scandalise the micheline. The hale criminate the micheline. The hale down the gordan. If something is maudlin then it scandalise the hale. If something down the gordan and it is not accordant then the gordan criminate the micheline. If something criminate the hale then it criminate the gordan. If the isaiah is bearish and the isaiah is not accordant then the isaiah does not visit the gordan. If something down the micheline then it is maudlin. If something scandalise the gordan then the gordan is not maudlin. The isaiah down the hale.", "logic": "\nnot Criminate(micheline, isaiah)\nCriminate(micheline, hale)\nDown(micheline, gordan)\nDown(micheline, hale)\nWigless(micheline)\nDown(gordan, micheline)\nAccordant(gordan)\nScandalise(isaiah, micheline)\nCriminate(hale, micheline)\nDown(hale, gordan)\nforall x (Maudlin(x) -> Scandalise(x, hale))\nforall x (Down(x, gordan) and not Accordant(x) -> Criminate(gordan, micheline))\nforall x (Criminate(x, hale) -> Criminate(x, gordan))\nBearish(isaiah) and not Accordant(isaiah) -> not Scandalise(isaiah, gordan)\nforall x (Down(x, micheline) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Scandalise(x, gordan) -> not Maudlin(gordan))\n\nDown(isaiah, hale)\n\nDown(isaiah, hale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The flossi does not chase the barnaby. The flossi refreshen the elnar. The flossi pair the jade. The flossi pair the elnar. The flossi is prickly. The jade pair the flossi. The jade is umptieth. The barnaby convect the flossi. The elnar refreshen the flossi. The elnar pair the jade. If something is cumuliform then it convect the elnar. If something pair the jade and it is not umptieth then the jade refreshen the flossi. If something refreshen the elnar then it refreshen the jade. If the barnaby is unabused and the barnaby is not umptieth then the barnaby does not visit the jade. If something pair the flossi then it is cumuliform. If something convect the jade then the jade is not cumuliform. The flossi is not umptieth.", "logic": "\nnot Refreshen(flossi, barnaby)\nRefreshen(flossi, elnar)\nPair(flossi, jade)\nPair(flossi, elnar)\nPrickly(flossi)\nPair(jade, flossi)\nUmptieth(jade)\nConvect(barnaby, flossi)\nRefreshen(elnar, flossi)\nPair(elnar, jade)\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) -> Convect(x, elnar))\nforall x (Pair(x, jade) and not Umptieth(x) -> Refreshen(jade, flossi))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, elnar) -> Refreshen(x, jade))\nUnabused(barnaby) and not Umptieth(barnaby) -> not Convect(barnaby, jade)\nforall x (Pair(x, flossi) -> Cumuliform(x))\nforall x (Convect(x, jade) -> not Cumuliform(jade))\n\nnot Umptieth(flossi)\n\nnot Umptieth(flossi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The seka does not chase the rollins. The seka presage the pia. The seka hush the lucia. The seka hush the pia. The seka is plausible. The lucia hush the seka. The lucia is straggly. The rollins distil the seka. The pia presage the seka. The pia hush the lucia. If something is heedless then it distil the pia. If something hush the lucia and it is not straggly then the lucia presage the seka. If something presage the pia then it presage the lucia. If the rollins is vicious and the rollins is not straggly then the rollins does not visit the lucia. If something hush the seka then it is heedless. If something distil the lucia then the lucia is not heedless. The rollins is straggly.", "logic": "\nnot Presage(seka, rollins)\nPresage(seka, pia)\nHush(seka, lucia)\nHush(seka, pia)\nPlausible(seka)\nHush(lucia, seka)\nStraggly(lucia)\nDistil(rollins, seka)\nPresage(pia, seka)\nHush(pia, lucia)\nforall x (Heedless(x) -> Distil(x, pia))\nforall x (Hush(x, lucia) and not Straggly(x) -> Presage(lucia, seka))\nforall x (Presage(x, pia) -> Presage(x, lucia))\nVicious(rollins) and not Straggly(rollins) -> not Distil(rollins, lucia)\nforall x (Hush(x, seka) -> Heedless(x))\nforall x (Distil(x, lucia) -> not Heedless(lucia))\n\nStraggly(rollins)\n\nStraggly(rollins) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Dorotea is not engraved. Gisela is unglazed. Smart, fusiform things are irregular. If Dorotea is unglazed then Dorotea is astir. Dorotea is not engraved.", "logic": "\nnot Engraved(dorotea)\nUnglazed(gisela)\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) and Fusiform(x) -> Irregular(x))\nUnglazed(dorotea) -> Astir(dorotea)\n\nnot Engraved(dorotea)\n\ntherefore not Engraved(dorotea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3095"} {"premises": "Sheppard is not weary. Renard is amort. Smart, past things are retrousse. If Sheppard is amort then Sheppard is decreased. Renard is not amort.", "logic": "\nnot Weary(sheppard)\nAmort(renard)\nforall x (Peculiar(x) and Past(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nAmort(sheppard) -> Decreased(sheppard)\n\nnot Amort(renard)\n\ntherefore Amort(renard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3095"} {"premises": "Parwane is not emblematic. Jori is washy. Smart, ruinous things are clubfooted. If Parwane is washy then Parwane is swingeing. Jori is not clubfooted.", "logic": "\nnot Emblematic(parwane)\nWashy(jori)\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) and Ruinous(x) -> Clubfooted(x))\nWashy(parwane) -> Swingeing(parwane)\n\nnot Clubfooted(jori)\n\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) and Ruinous(x) -> Clubfooted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3095"} {"premises": "Aeriell is not nicaean. Robin is degraded. Smart, eroded things are hogged. If Aeriell is degraded then Aeriell is realised. Robin is eroded.", "logic": "\nnot Nicaean(aeriell)\nDegraded(robin)\nforall x (Doric(x) and Eroded(x) -> Hogged(x))\nDegraded(aeriell) -> Realised(aeriell)\n\nEroded(robin)\n\nEroded(robin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3095"} {"premises": "The mignonne is daedal. The ramonda is handheld. If something powderize the ramonda and the ramonda couple the mignonne then the mignonne is daedal. If the ramonda powderize the mignonne and the mignonne couple the ramonda then the ramonda is daedal. If something is fawning and it powderize the ramonda then the ramonda couple the mignonne. The ramonda is handheld.", "logic": "\nDaedal(mignonne)\nHandheld(ramonda)\nforall x (Powderize(x, ramonda) and Couple(ramonda, mignonne) -> Daedal(mignonne))\nPowderize(ramonda, mignonne) and Couple(mignonne, ramonda) -> Daedal(ramonda)\nforall x (Fawning(x) and Powderize(x, ramonda) -> Couple(ramonda, mignonne))\n\nHandheld(ramonda)\n\ntherefore Handheld(ramonda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5083"} {"premises": "The juli is winsome. The vonni is gustative. If something race the vonni and the vonni flatter the juli then the juli is winsome. If the vonni race the juli and the juli flatter the vonni then the vonni is winsome. If something is befouled and it race the vonni then the vonni flatter the juli. The vonni is not gustative.", "logic": "\nWinsome(juli)\nGustative(vonni)\nforall x (Race(x, vonni) and Flatter(vonni, juli) -> Winsome(juli))\nRace(vonni, juli) and Flatter(juli, vonni) -> Winsome(vonni)\nforall x (Befouled(x) and Race(x, vonni) -> Flatter(vonni, juli))\n\nnot Gustative(vonni)\n\ntherefore Gustative(vonni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5083"} {"premises": "The carrissa is knotty. The will is gardant. If something fake the will and the will behold the carrissa then the carrissa is knotty. If the will fake the carrissa and the carrissa behold the will then the will is knotty. If something is uncapped and it fake the will then the will behold the carrissa. The will is not knotty.", "logic": "\nKnotty(carrissa)\nGardant(will)\nforall x (Fake(x, will) and Behold(will, carrissa) -> Knotty(carrissa))\nFake(will, carrissa) and Behold(carrissa, will) -> Knotty(will)\nforall x (Uncapped(x) and Fake(x, will) -> Behold(will, carrissa))\n\nnot Knotty(will)\n\nFake(will, carrissa) and Behold(carrissa, will) -> Knotty(will) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5083"} {"premises": "The brendan is amok. The norman is gross. If something shlep the norman and the norman speckle the brendan then the brendan is amok. If the norman shlep the brendan and the brendan speckle the norman then the norman is amok. If something is bahai and it shlep the norman then the norman speckle the brendan. The brendan shlep the brendan.", "logic": "\nAmok(brendan)\nGross(norman)\nforall x (Shlep(x, norman) and Speckle(norman, brendan) -> Amok(brendan))\nShlep(norman, brendan) and Speckle(brendan, norman) -> Amok(norman)\nforall x (Bahai(x) and Shlep(x, norman) -> Speckle(norman, brendan))\n\nShlep(brendan, brendan)\n\nShlep(brendan, brendan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5083"} {"premises": "Hanna is godly. Hanna is toothed. Hanna is thoracic. Hanna is then. Janine is southmost. Janine is sound. Sidonia is godly. Sidonia is toothed. Sidonia is thoracic. Sidonia is then. Sidonia is perinasal. Loria is southmost. Loria is thoracic. Loria is sound. Loria is perinasal. All perinasal, sound people are then. All sound people are toothed. Kind people are then. Hanna is godly.", "logic": "\nGodly(hanna)\nToothed(hanna)\nThoracic(hanna)\nThen(hanna)\nSouthmost(janine)\nSound(janine)\nGodly(sidonia)\nToothed(sidonia)\nThoracic(sidonia)\nThen(sidonia)\nPerinasal(sidonia)\nSouthmost(loria)\nThoracic(loria)\nSound(loria)\nPerinasal(loria)\nforall x (Perinasal(x) and Sound(x) -> Then(x))\nforall x (Sound(x) -> Toothed(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> Then(x))\n\nGodly(hanna)\n\ntherefore Godly(hanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-677"} {"premises": "Shina is vital. Shina is removed. Shina is morganatic. Shina is amazed. Giovanna is abyssal. Giovanna is chordal. Norwood is vital. Norwood is removed. Norwood is morganatic. Norwood is amazed. Norwood is scratchy. Nettie is abyssal. Nettie is morganatic. Nettie is chordal. Nettie is scratchy. All scratchy, chordal people are amazed. All chordal people are removed. Kind people are amazed. Nettie is not abyssal.", "logic": "\nVital(shina)\nRemoved(shina)\nMorganatic(shina)\nAmazed(shina)\nAbyssal(giovanna)\nChordal(giovanna)\nVital(norwood)\nRemoved(norwood)\nMorganatic(norwood)\nAmazed(norwood)\nScratchy(norwood)\nAbyssal(nettie)\nMorganatic(nettie)\nChordal(nettie)\nScratchy(nettie)\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Chordal(x) -> Amazed(x))\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Abyssal(x) -> Amazed(x))\n\nnot Abyssal(nettie)\n\ntherefore Abyssal(nettie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-677"} {"premises": "Darius is metaphoric. Darius is illiberal. Darius is shadowy. Darius is doting. Alexi is sunlit. Alexi is dicky. Delaney is metaphoric. Delaney is illiberal. Delaney is shadowy. Delaney is doting. Delaney is tensional. Erek is sunlit. Erek is shadowy. Erek is dicky. Erek is tensional. All tensional, dicky people are doting. All dicky people are illiberal. Kind people are doting. Alexi is not metaphoric.", "logic": "\nMetaphoric(darius)\nIlliberal(darius)\nShadowy(darius)\nDoting(darius)\nSunlit(alexi)\nDicky(alexi)\nMetaphoric(delaney)\nIlliberal(delaney)\nShadowy(delaney)\nDoting(delaney)\nTensional(delaney)\nSunlit(erek)\nShadowy(erek)\nDicky(erek)\nTensional(erek)\nforall x (Tensional(x) and Dicky(x) -> Doting(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Illiberal(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) -> Doting(x))\n\nnot Metaphoric(alexi)\n\nnot Metaphoric(alexi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-677"} {"premises": "Pam is getatable. Pam is prismatic. Pam is celibate. Pam is mutinous. Stefa is rhinal. Stefa is fulgid. Appolonia is getatable. Appolonia is prismatic. Appolonia is celibate. Appolonia is mutinous. Appolonia is expurgated. Arabelle is rhinal. Arabelle is celibate. Arabelle is fulgid. Arabelle is expurgated. All expurgated, fulgid people are mutinous. All fulgid people are prismatic. Kind people are mutinous. Appolonia is rhinal.", "logic": "\nGetatable(pam)\nPrismatic(pam)\nCelibate(pam)\nMutinous(pam)\nRhinal(stefa)\nFulgid(stefa)\nGetatable(appolonia)\nPrismatic(appolonia)\nCelibate(appolonia)\nMutinous(appolonia)\nExpurgated(appolonia)\nRhinal(arabelle)\nCelibate(arabelle)\nFulgid(arabelle)\nExpurgated(arabelle)\nforall x (Expurgated(x) and Fulgid(x) -> Mutinous(x))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Rhinal(x) -> Mutinous(x))\n\nRhinal(appolonia)\n\nRhinal(appolonia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-677"} {"premises": "Genia is naif. Rodina is revised. Rodina is nonpareil. All cosmologic people are nonpareil. If someone is naif then they are cosmologic. Genia is naif.", "logic": "\nNaif(genia)\nRevised(rodina)\nNonpareil(rodina)\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Nonpareil(x))\nforall x (Naif(x) -> Cosmologic(x))\n\nNaif(genia)\n\ntherefore Naif(genia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Mariya is myopic. Ayn is filled. Ayn is executive. All uninominal people are executive. If someone is myopic then they are uninominal. Ayn is not executive.", "logic": "\nMyopic(mariya)\nFilled(ayn)\nExecutive(ayn)\nforall x (Uninominal(x) -> Executive(x))\nforall x (Myopic(x) -> Uninominal(x))\n\nnot Executive(ayn)\n\ntherefore Executive(ayn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Albatros is irruptive. Paloma is meiotic. Paloma is confirmed. All beltless people are confirmed. If someone is irruptive then they are beltless. Albatros is beltless.", "logic": "\nIrruptive(albatros)\nMeiotic(paloma)\nConfirmed(paloma)\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Confirmed(x))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) -> Beltless(x))\n\nBeltless(albatros)\n\nIrruptive(albatros) and forall x (Irruptive(x) -> Beltless(x)) -> therefore Beltless(albatros)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Joann is unequipped. Valentine is fractious. Valentine is sophomore. All leafless people are sophomore. If someone is unequipped then they are leafless. Joann is not leafless.", "logic": "\nUnequipped(joann)\nFractious(valentine)\nSophomore(valentine)\nforall x (Leafless(x) -> Sophomore(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Leafless(x))\n\nnot Leafless(joann)\n\nUnequipped(joann) and forall x (Unequipped(x) -> Leafless(x)) -> therefore Leafless(joann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Candida is untrusting. Umberto is calculated. Umberto is canicular. All rotten people are canicular. If someone is untrusting then they are rotten. Candida is canicular.", "logic": "\nUntrusting(candida)\nCalculated(umberto)\nCanicular(umberto)\nforall x (Rotten(x) -> Canicular(x))\nforall x (Untrusting(x) -> Rotten(x))\n\nCanicular(candida)\n\nUntrusting(candida) and forall x (Untrusting(x) -> Rotten(x)) -> therefore Rotten(candida) Rotten(candida) and forall x (Rotten(x) -> Canicular(x)) -> therefore Canicular(candida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Vivyan is tailless. Shell is fledgeling. Shell is noncaloric. All primaeval people are noncaloric. If someone is tailless then they are primaeval. Vivyan is not noncaloric.", "logic": "\nTailless(vivyan)\nFledgeling(shell)\nNoncaloric(shell)\nforall x (Primaeval(x) -> Noncaloric(x))\nforall x (Tailless(x) -> Primaeval(x))\n\nnot Noncaloric(vivyan)\n\nTailless(vivyan) and forall x (Tailless(x) -> Primaeval(x)) -> therefore Primaeval(vivyan) Primaeval(vivyan) and forall x (Primaeval(x) -> Noncaloric(x)) -> therefore Noncaloric(vivyan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Clea is substitute. Micheal is terete. Micheal is resolvable. All scandent people are resolvable. If someone is substitute then they are scandent. Micheal is not scandent.", "logic": "\nSubstitute(clea)\nTerete(micheal)\nResolvable(micheal)\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Resolvable(x))\nforall x (Substitute(x) -> Scandent(x))\n\nnot Scandent(micheal)\n\nforall x (Substitute(x) -> Scandent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Roda is impervious. June is thermic. June is freshman. All beltless people are freshman. If someone is impervious then they are beltless. June is big.", "logic": "\nImpervious(roda)\nThermic(june)\nFreshman(june)\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Freshman(x))\nforall x (Impervious(x) -> Beltless(x))\n\nBig(june)\n\nBig(june) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Aila is semiarid. Oran is maoist. Oran is aperiodic. All transitive people are aperiodic. If someone is semiarid then they are transitive. Aila is not big.", "logic": "\nSemiarid(aila)\nMaoist(oran)\nAperiodic(oran)\nforall x (Transitive(x) -> Aperiodic(x))\nforall x (Semiarid(x) -> Transitive(x))\n\nnot Big(aila)\n\nnot Big(aila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Candis is diluvian. Trenton is watchful. Trenton is affiliated. All alkalotic people are affiliated. If someone is diluvian then they are alkalotic. Trenton is diluvian.", "logic": "\nDiluvian(candis)\nWatchful(trenton)\nAffiliated(trenton)\nforall x (Alkalotic(x) -> Affiliated(x))\nforall x (Diluvian(x) -> Alkalotic(x))\n\nDiluvian(trenton)\n\nDiluvian(trenton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Betta is vibrant. Sigrid is alterative. Sigrid is abundant. All grayish people are abundant. If someone is vibrant then they are grayish. Betta is not furry.", "logic": "\nVibrant(betta)\nAlterative(sigrid)\nAbundant(sigrid)\nforall x (Grayish(x) -> Abundant(x))\nforall x (Vibrant(x) -> Grayish(x))\n\nnot Furry(betta)\n\nnot Furry(betta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Blisse is slanting. Marley is uptight. Marley is okay. All thousand people are okay. If someone is slanting then they are thousand. Marley is green.", "logic": "\nSlanting(blisse)\nUptight(marley)\nOkay(marley)\nforall x (Thousand(x) -> Okay(x))\nforall x (Slanting(x) -> Thousand(x))\n\nGreen(marley)\n\nGreen(marley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-677"} {"premises": "Idell is heretical. Lolita is tenth. Lizette is slangy. Demeter is tenth. All heretical things are firm. Rough things are tenth. Rough things are supportive. Nice things are antonymous. If Demeter is antonymous and Demeter is heretical then Demeter is careless. If Lolita is tenth then Lolita is careless. Lolita is tenth.", "logic": "\nHeretical(idell)\nTenth(lolita)\nSlangy(lizette)\nTenth(demeter)\nforall x (Heretical(x) -> Firm(x))\nforall x (Antonymous(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Antonymous(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Careless(x) -> Antonymous(x))\nAntonymous(demeter) and Heretical(demeter) -> Careless(demeter)\nTenth(lolita) -> Careless(lolita)\n\nTenth(lolita)\n\ntherefore Tenth(lolita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Shurlock is pliant. Rahal is proclaimed. Malynda is hircine. Dorcas is proclaimed. All pliant things are ocular. Rough things are proclaimed. Rough things are sulphurous. Nice things are liquefied. If Dorcas is liquefied and Dorcas is pliant then Dorcas is adpressed. If Rahal is proclaimed then Rahal is adpressed. Dorcas is not proclaimed.", "logic": "\nPliant(shurlock)\nProclaimed(rahal)\nHircine(malynda)\nProclaimed(dorcas)\nforall x (Pliant(x) -> Ocular(x))\nforall x (Liquefied(x) -> Proclaimed(x))\nforall x (Liquefied(x) -> Sulphurous(x))\nforall x (Adpressed(x) -> Liquefied(x))\nLiquefied(dorcas) and Pliant(dorcas) -> Adpressed(dorcas)\nProclaimed(rahal) -> Adpressed(rahal)\n\nnot Proclaimed(dorcas)\n\ntherefore Proclaimed(dorcas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Shaylah is branchy. Stafford is impeccable. Marget is concise. Ethelyn is impeccable. All branchy things are biradial. Rough things are impeccable. Rough things are deviate. Nice things are burrlike. If Ethelyn is burrlike and Ethelyn is branchy then Ethelyn is credulous. If Stafford is impeccable then Stafford is credulous. Stafford is credulous.", "logic": "\nBranchy(shaylah)\nImpeccable(stafford)\nConcise(marget)\nImpeccable(ethelyn)\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Biradial(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) -> Impeccable(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) -> Deviate(x))\nforall x (Credulous(x) -> Burrlike(x))\nBurrlike(ethelyn) and Branchy(ethelyn) -> Credulous(ethelyn)\nImpeccable(stafford) -> Credulous(stafford)\n\nCredulous(stafford)\n\nImpeccable(stafford) and Impeccable(stafford) -> Credulous(stafford) -> therefore Credulous(stafford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Tuckie is downmarket. Tybalt is undersized. Lukas is repressive. Shelden is undersized. All downmarket things are nonunion. Rough things are undersized. Rough things are rustless. Nice things are unreported. If Shelden is unreported and Shelden is downmarket then Shelden is aggregated. If Tybalt is undersized then Tybalt is aggregated. Tuckie is not nonunion.", "logic": "\nDownmarket(tuckie)\nUndersized(tybalt)\nRepressive(lukas)\nUndersized(shelden)\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Undersized(x))\nforall x (Unreported(x) -> Rustless(x))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Unreported(x))\nUnreported(shelden) and Downmarket(shelden) -> Aggregated(shelden)\nUndersized(tybalt) -> Aggregated(tybalt)\n\nnot Nonunion(tuckie)\n\nDownmarket(tuckie) and forall x (Downmarket(x) -> Nonunion(x)) -> therefore Nonunion(tuckie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Kittie is candent. Wang is summative. Gregg is obdurate. Bethany is summative. All candent things are enticing. Rough things are summative. Rough things are minded. Nice things are rotary. If Bethany is rotary and Bethany is candent then Bethany is garmented. If Wang is summative then Wang is garmented. Wang is rotary.", "logic": "\nCandent(kittie)\nSummative(wang)\nObdurate(gregg)\nSummative(bethany)\nforall x (Candent(x) -> Enticing(x))\nforall x (Rotary(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Rotary(x) -> Minded(x))\nforall x (Garmented(x) -> Rotary(x))\nRotary(bethany) and Candent(bethany) -> Garmented(bethany)\nSummative(wang) -> Garmented(wang)\n\nRotary(wang)\n\nSummative(wang) and Summative(wang) -> Garmented(wang) -> therefore Garmented(wang) Garmented(wang) and forall x (Garmented(x) -> Rotary(x)) -> therefore Rotary(wang)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Gustaf is muddled. Elbertine is iffy. Lurline is uncrowded. Bettina is iffy. All muddled things are invertible. Rough things are iffy. Rough things are fabian. Nice things are glistening. If Bettina is glistening and Bettina is muddled then Bettina is fatherlike. If Elbertine is iffy then Elbertine is fatherlike. Elbertine is not glistening.", "logic": "\nMuddled(gustaf)\nIffy(elbertine)\nUncrowded(lurline)\nIffy(bettina)\nforall x (Muddled(x) -> Invertible(x))\nforall x (Glistening(x) -> Iffy(x))\nforall x (Glistening(x) -> Fabian(x))\nforall x (Fatherlike(x) -> Glistening(x))\nGlistening(bettina) and Muddled(bettina) -> Fatherlike(bettina)\nIffy(elbertine) -> Fatherlike(elbertine)\n\nnot Glistening(elbertine)\n\nIffy(elbertine) and Iffy(elbertine) -> Fatherlike(elbertine) -> therefore Fatherlike(elbertine) Fatherlike(elbertine) and forall x (Fatherlike(x) -> Glistening(x)) -> therefore Glistening(elbertine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Cecile is probatory. Norbert is hoary. Toma is inbound. Abbe is hoary. All probatory things are bimanual. Rough things are hoary. Rough things are bloody. Nice things are beholden. If Abbe is beholden and Abbe is probatory then Abbe is oral. If Norbert is hoary then Norbert is oral. Norbert is bloody.", "logic": "\nProbatory(cecile)\nHoary(norbert)\nInbound(toma)\nHoary(abbe)\nforall x (Probatory(x) -> Bimanual(x))\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Beholden(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Oral(x) -> Beholden(x))\nBeholden(abbe) and Probatory(abbe) -> Oral(abbe)\nHoary(norbert) -> Oral(norbert)\n\nBloody(norbert)\n\nHoary(norbert) and Hoary(norbert) -> Oral(norbert) -> therefore Oral(norbert) Oral(norbert) and forall x (Oral(x) -> Beholden(x)) -> therefore Beholden(norbert) Beholden(norbert) and forall x (Beholden(x) -> Bloody(x)) -> therefore Bloody(norbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Charleen is orbiculate. Dione is subsidized. Richmond is feral. Dmitri is subsidized. All orbiculate things are tibial. Rough things are subsidized. Rough things are untoward. Nice things are uveous. If Dmitri is uveous and Dmitri is orbiculate then Dmitri is harmonical. If Dione is subsidized then Dione is harmonical. Dione is not untoward.", "logic": "\nOrbiculate(charleen)\nSubsidized(dione)\nFeral(richmond)\nSubsidized(dmitri)\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) -> Tibial(x))\nforall x (Uveous(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Uveous(x) -> Untoward(x))\nforall x (Harmonical(x) -> Uveous(x))\nUveous(dmitri) and Orbiculate(dmitri) -> Harmonical(dmitri)\nSubsidized(dione) -> Harmonical(dione)\n\nnot Untoward(dione)\n\nSubsidized(dione) and Subsidized(dione) -> Harmonical(dione) -> therefore Harmonical(dione) Harmonical(dione) and forall x (Harmonical(x) -> Uveous(x)) -> therefore Uveous(dione) Uveous(dione) and forall x (Uveous(x) -> Untoward(x)) -> therefore Untoward(dione)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Lyndsay is labiate. Katya is armorial. Nicoli is agonizing. Josi is armorial. All labiate things are appetitive. Rough things are armorial. Rough things are fussy. Nice things are uncommon. If Josi is uncommon and Josi is labiate then Josi is voiceless. If Katya is armorial then Katya is voiceless. Nicoli is not appetitive.", "logic": "\nLabiate(lyndsay)\nArmorial(katya)\nAgonizing(nicoli)\nArmorial(josi)\nforall x (Labiate(x) -> Appetitive(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) -> Armorial(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) -> Fussy(x))\nforall x (Voiceless(x) -> Uncommon(x))\nUncommon(josi) and Labiate(josi) -> Voiceless(josi)\nArmorial(katya) -> Voiceless(katya)\n\nnot Appetitive(nicoli)\n\nforall x (Labiate(x) -> Appetitive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Felisha is perverse. Gerrit is diverse. Romola is edentate. Lorelle is diverse. All perverse things are splayfoot. Rough things are diverse. Rough things are sublimated. Nice things are scurfy. If Lorelle is scurfy and Lorelle is perverse then Lorelle is cleanable. If Gerrit is diverse then Gerrit is cleanable. Felisha is diverse.", "logic": "\nPerverse(felisha)\nDiverse(gerrit)\nEdentate(romola)\nDiverse(lorelle)\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Splayfoot(x))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Diverse(x))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Sublimated(x))\nforall x (Cleanable(x) -> Scurfy(x))\nScurfy(lorelle) and Perverse(lorelle) -> Cleanable(lorelle)\nDiverse(gerrit) -> Cleanable(gerrit)\n\nDiverse(felisha)\n\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Diverse(x)) <- forall x (Cleanable(x) -> Scurfy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Dulce is highland. Aleta is deltoid. Jordan is segregated. Darcey is deltoid. All highland things are knockdown. Rough things are deltoid. Rough things are lepidote. Nice things are sneaking. If Darcey is sneaking and Darcey is highland then Darcey is swish. If Aleta is deltoid then Aleta is swish. Darcey is not knockdown.", "logic": "\nHighland(dulce)\nDeltoid(aleta)\nSegregated(jordan)\nDeltoid(darcey)\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Knockdown(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Lepidote(x))\nforall x (Swish(x) -> Sneaking(x))\nSneaking(darcey) and Highland(darcey) -> Swish(darcey)\nDeltoid(aleta) -> Swish(aleta)\n\nnot Knockdown(darcey)\n\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Knockdown(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Lucius is multilane. Sisely is endodontic. Caitlin is indigent. Annamari is endodontic. All multilane things are military. Rough things are endodontic. Rough things are annulate. Nice things are logical. If Annamari is logical and Annamari is multilane then Annamari is sprawling. If Sisely is endodontic then Sisely is sprawling. Annamari is annulate.", "logic": "\nMultilane(lucius)\nEndodontic(sisely)\nIndigent(caitlin)\nEndodontic(annamari)\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Military(x))\nforall x (Logical(x) -> Endodontic(x))\nforall x (Logical(x) -> Annulate(x))\nforall x (Sprawling(x) -> Logical(x))\nLogical(annamari) and Multilane(annamari) -> Sprawling(annamari)\nEndodontic(sisely) -> Sprawling(sisely)\n\nAnnulate(annamari)\n\nforall x (Logical(x) -> Annulate(x)) <- forall x (Sprawling(x) -> Logical(x)) <- Logical(annamari) and Multilane(annamari) -> Sprawling(annamari) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Pincas is aerolitic. Lorita is cyclonic. Cynthy is dietary. Fern is cyclonic. All aerolitic things are smooth. Rough things are cyclonic. Rough things are pilotless. Nice things are climbable. If Fern is climbable and Fern is aerolitic then Fern is chief. If Lorita is cyclonic then Lorita is chief. Cynthy is not chief.", "logic": "\nAerolitic(pincas)\nCyclonic(lorita)\nDietary(cynthy)\nCyclonic(fern)\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Smooth(x))\nforall x (Climbable(x) -> Cyclonic(x))\nforall x (Climbable(x) -> Pilotless(x))\nforall x (Chief(x) -> Climbable(x))\nClimbable(fern) and Aerolitic(fern) -> Chief(fern)\nCyclonic(lorita) -> Chief(lorita)\n\nnot Chief(cynthy)\n\nnot Chief(cynthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Anatoly is hardbound. Dane is sticky. Dalia is systemic. Julianna is sticky. All hardbound things are triassic. Rough things are sticky. Rough things are acceptable. Nice things are struck. If Julianna is struck and Julianna is hardbound then Julianna is ethnical. If Dane is sticky then Dane is ethnical. Anatoly is ethnical.", "logic": "\nHardbound(anatoly)\nSticky(dane)\nSystemic(dalia)\nSticky(julianna)\nforall x (Hardbound(x) -> Triassic(x))\nforall x (Struck(x) -> Sticky(x))\nforall x (Struck(x) -> Acceptable(x))\nforall x (Ethnical(x) -> Struck(x))\nStruck(julianna) and Hardbound(julianna) -> Ethnical(julianna)\nSticky(dane) -> Ethnical(dane)\n\nEthnical(anatoly)\n\nEthnical(anatoly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Mady is robotlike. Meta is primo. Riva is treasonous. Rosaleen is primo. All robotlike things are twisting. Rough things are primo. Rough things are unforeseen. Nice things are maroc. If Rosaleen is maroc and Rosaleen is robotlike then Rosaleen is awninged. If Meta is primo then Meta is awninged. Rosaleen is not robotlike.", "logic": "\nRobotlike(mady)\nPrimo(meta)\nTreasonous(riva)\nPrimo(rosaleen)\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Twisting(x))\nforall x (Maroc(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Maroc(x) -> Unforeseen(x))\nforall x (Awninged(x) -> Maroc(x))\nMaroc(rosaleen) and Robotlike(rosaleen) -> Awninged(rosaleen)\nPrimo(meta) -> Awninged(meta)\n\nnot Robotlike(rosaleen)\n\nnot Robotlike(rosaleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "Viv is oval. Foster is lamentable. Rik is slipping. Bernice is lamentable. All oval things are landless. Rough things are lamentable. Rough things are stated. Nice things are crookback. If Bernice is crookback and Bernice is oval then Bernice is moldable. If Foster is lamentable then Foster is moldable. Rik is oval.", "logic": "\nOval(viv)\nLamentable(foster)\nSlipping(rik)\nLamentable(bernice)\nforall x (Oval(x) -> Landless(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Lamentable(x))\nforall x (Crookback(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (Moldable(x) -> Crookback(x))\nCrookback(bernice) and Oval(bernice) -> Moldable(bernice)\nLamentable(foster) -> Moldable(foster)\n\nOval(rik)\n\nOval(rik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-756"} {"premises": "The hortense bestialise the danit. The hortense canvas the fawn. The hortense is atrophic. The hortense is cathectic. The hortense stamp the danit. The fawn is uncensored. The danit bestialise the fawn. If someone is uncensored and they eat the fawn then the fawn is uncensored. If the danit stamp the hortense and the hortense stamp the danit then the hortense is randomized. If the danit does not eat the hortense then the danit canvas the fawn. If someone canvas the fawn then they eat the danit. If someone is uncensored then they eat the danit. If someone canvas the fawn and the fawn bestialise the hortense then the hortense stamp the fawn. If the hortense canvas the danit then the hortense is uncensored. If someone canvas the danit then they chase the hortense. The hortense canvas the fawn.", "logic": "\nBestialise(hortense, danit)\nCanvas(hortense, fawn)\nAtrophic(hortense)\nCathectic(hortense)\nStamp(hortense, danit)\nUncensored(fawn)\nBestialise(danit, fawn)\nforall x (Uncensored(x) and Canvas(x, fawn) -> Uncensored(fawn))\nStamp(danit, hortense) and Stamp(hortense, danit) -> Randomized(hortense)\nnot Canvas(danit, hortense) -> Canvas(danit, fawn)\nforall x (Canvas(x, fawn) -> Canvas(x, danit))\nforall x (Uncensored(x) -> Canvas(x, danit))\nforall x (Canvas(x, fawn) and Bestialise(fawn, hortense) -> Stamp(hortense, fawn))\nCanvas(hortense, danit) -> Uncensored(hortense)\nforall x (Canvas(x, danit) -> Bestialise(x, hortense))\n\nCanvas(hortense, fawn)\n\ntherefore Canvas(hortense, fawn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The urson ventilate the josee. The urson vamp the charissa. The urson is impartial. The urson is hadean. The urson unmake the josee. The charissa is pycnotic. The josee ventilate the charissa. If someone is pycnotic and they eat the charissa then the charissa is pycnotic. If the josee unmake the urson and the urson unmake the josee then the urson is conic. If the josee does not eat the urson then the josee vamp the charissa. If someone vamp the charissa then they eat the josee. If someone is pycnotic then they eat the josee. If someone vamp the charissa and the charissa ventilate the urson then the urson unmake the charissa. If the urson vamp the josee then the urson is pycnotic. If someone vamp the josee then they chase the urson. The josee does not chase the charissa.", "logic": "\nVentilate(urson, josee)\nVamp(urson, charissa)\nImpartial(urson)\nHadean(urson)\nUnmake(urson, josee)\nPycnotic(charissa)\nVentilate(josee, charissa)\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) and Vamp(x, charissa) -> Pycnotic(charissa))\nUnmake(josee, urson) and Unmake(urson, josee) -> Conic(urson)\nnot Vamp(josee, urson) -> Vamp(josee, charissa)\nforall x (Vamp(x, charissa) -> Vamp(x, josee))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Vamp(x, josee))\nforall x (Vamp(x, charissa) and Ventilate(charissa, urson) -> Unmake(urson, charissa))\nVamp(urson, josee) -> Pycnotic(urson)\nforall x (Vamp(x, josee) -> Ventilate(x, urson))\n\nnot Ventilate(josee, charissa)\n\ntherefore Ventilate(josee, charissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The carmita adulterate the dina. The carmita lysogenize the vernon. The carmita is motherless. The carmita is succulent. The carmita rumba the dina. The vernon is bindable. The dina adulterate the vernon. If someone is bindable and they eat the vernon then the vernon is bindable. If the dina rumba the carmita and the carmita rumba the dina then the carmita is fifth. If the dina does not eat the carmita then the dina lysogenize the vernon. If someone lysogenize the vernon then they eat the dina. If someone is bindable then they eat the dina. If someone lysogenize the vernon and the vernon adulterate the carmita then the carmita rumba the vernon. If the carmita lysogenize the dina then the carmita is bindable. If someone lysogenize the dina then they chase the carmita. The vernon lysogenize the dina.", "logic": "\nAdulterate(carmita, dina)\nLysogenize(carmita, vernon)\nMotherless(carmita)\nSucculent(carmita)\nRumba(carmita, dina)\nBindable(vernon)\nAdulterate(dina, vernon)\nforall x (Bindable(x) and Lysogenize(x, vernon) -> Bindable(vernon))\nRumba(dina, carmita) and Rumba(carmita, dina) -> Fifth(carmita)\nnot Lysogenize(dina, carmita) -> Lysogenize(dina, vernon)\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, vernon) -> Lysogenize(x, dina))\nforall x (Bindable(x) -> Lysogenize(x, dina))\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, vernon) and Adulterate(vernon, carmita) -> Rumba(carmita, vernon))\nLysogenize(carmita, dina) -> Bindable(carmita)\nforall x (Lysogenize(x, dina) -> Adulterate(x, carmita))\n\nLysogenize(vernon, dina)\n\nBindable(vernon) and forall x (Bindable(x) -> Lysogenize(x, dina)) -> therefore Lysogenize(vernon, dina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The oren hone the marcia. The oren flagellate the sheril. The oren is mythologic. The oren is factious. The oren nominate the marcia. The sheril is limbic. The marcia hone the sheril. If someone is limbic and they eat the sheril then the sheril is limbic. If the marcia nominate the oren and the oren nominate the marcia then the oren is then. If the marcia does not eat the oren then the marcia flagellate the sheril. If someone flagellate the sheril then they eat the marcia. If someone is limbic then they eat the marcia. If someone flagellate the sheril and the sheril hone the oren then the oren nominate the sheril. If the oren flagellate the marcia then the oren is limbic. If someone flagellate the marcia then they chase the oren. The sheril does not eat the marcia.", "logic": "\nHone(oren, marcia)\nFlagellate(oren, sheril)\nMythologic(oren)\nFactious(oren)\nNominate(oren, marcia)\nLimbic(sheril)\nHone(marcia, sheril)\nforall x (Limbic(x) and Flagellate(x, sheril) -> Limbic(sheril))\nNominate(marcia, oren) and Nominate(oren, marcia) -> Then(oren)\nnot Flagellate(marcia, oren) -> Flagellate(marcia, sheril)\nforall x (Flagellate(x, sheril) -> Flagellate(x, marcia))\nforall x (Limbic(x) -> Flagellate(x, marcia))\nforall x (Flagellate(x, sheril) and Hone(sheril, oren) -> Nominate(oren, sheril))\nFlagellate(oren, marcia) -> Limbic(oren)\nforall x (Flagellate(x, marcia) -> Hone(x, oren))\n\nnot Flagellate(sheril, marcia)\n\nLimbic(sheril) and forall x (Limbic(x) -> Flagellate(x, marcia)) -> therefore Flagellate(sheril, marcia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The harri odorize the lainey. The harri demobilise the tiphani. The harri is elevated. The harri is abusive. The harri preisolate the lainey. The tiphani is peaky. The lainey odorize the tiphani. If someone is peaky and they eat the tiphani then the tiphani is peaky. If the lainey preisolate the harri and the harri preisolate the lainey then the harri is rimeless. If the lainey does not eat the harri then the lainey demobilise the tiphani. If someone demobilise the tiphani then they eat the lainey. If someone is peaky then they eat the lainey. If someone demobilise the tiphani and the tiphani odorize the harri then the harri preisolate the tiphani. If the harri demobilise the lainey then the harri is peaky. If someone demobilise the lainey then they chase the harri. The tiphani odorize the harri.", "logic": "\nOdorize(harri, lainey)\nDemobilise(harri, tiphani)\nElevated(harri)\nAbusive(harri)\nPreisolate(harri, lainey)\nPeaky(tiphani)\nOdorize(lainey, tiphani)\nforall x (Peaky(x) and Demobilise(x, tiphani) -> Peaky(tiphani))\nPreisolate(lainey, harri) and Preisolate(harri, lainey) -> Rimeless(harri)\nnot Demobilise(lainey, harri) -> Demobilise(lainey, tiphani)\nforall x (Demobilise(x, tiphani) -> Demobilise(x, lainey))\nforall x (Peaky(x) -> Demobilise(x, lainey))\nforall x (Demobilise(x, tiphani) and Odorize(tiphani, harri) -> Preisolate(harri, tiphani))\nDemobilise(harri, lainey) -> Peaky(harri)\nforall x (Demobilise(x, lainey) -> Odorize(x, harri))\n\nOdorize(tiphani, harri)\n\nPeaky(tiphani) and forall x (Peaky(x) -> Demobilise(x, lainey)) -> therefore Demobilise(tiphani, lainey) Demobilise(tiphani, lainey) and forall x (Demobilise(x, lainey) -> Odorize(x, harri)) -> therefore Odorize(tiphani, harri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The pandora misgovern the nevins. The pandora tyrannise the olympe. The pandora is rotatable. The pandora is accessory. The pandora ptyalise the nevins. The olympe is authorized. The nevins misgovern the olympe. If someone is authorized and they eat the olympe then the olympe is authorized. If the nevins ptyalise the pandora and the pandora ptyalise the nevins then the pandora is frowsy. If the nevins does not eat the pandora then the nevins tyrannise the olympe. If someone tyrannise the olympe then they eat the nevins. If someone is authorized then they eat the nevins. If someone tyrannise the olympe and the olympe misgovern the pandora then the pandora ptyalise the olympe. If the pandora tyrannise the nevins then the pandora is authorized. If someone tyrannise the nevins then they chase the pandora. The pandora is not authorized.", "logic": "\nMisgovern(pandora, nevins)\nTyrannise(pandora, olympe)\nRotatable(pandora)\nAccessory(pandora)\nPtyalise(pandora, nevins)\nAuthorized(olympe)\nMisgovern(nevins, olympe)\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Tyrannise(x, olympe) -> Authorized(olympe))\nPtyalise(nevins, pandora) and Ptyalise(pandora, nevins) -> Frowsy(pandora)\nnot Tyrannise(nevins, pandora) -> Tyrannise(nevins, olympe)\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, olympe) -> Tyrannise(x, nevins))\nforall x (Authorized(x) -> Tyrannise(x, nevins))\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, olympe) and Misgovern(olympe, pandora) -> Ptyalise(pandora, olympe))\nTyrannise(pandora, nevins) -> Authorized(pandora)\nforall x (Tyrannise(x, nevins) -> Misgovern(x, pandora))\n\nnot Authorized(pandora)\n\nTyrannise(pandora, olympe) and forall x (Tyrannise(x, olympe) -> Tyrannise(x, nevins)) -> therefore Tyrannise(pandora, nevins) Tyrannise(pandora, nevins) and Tyrannise(pandora, nevins) -> Authorized(pandora) -> therefore Authorized(pandora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The francisca unravel the emil. The francisca bolshevize the bryon. The francisca is twinkling. The francisca is aflutter. The francisca reassail the emil. The bryon is windless. The emil unravel the bryon. If someone is windless and they eat the bryon then the bryon is windless. If the emil reassail the francisca and the francisca reassail the emil then the francisca is appetent. If the emil does not eat the francisca then the emil bolshevize the bryon. If someone bolshevize the bryon then they eat the emil. If someone is windless then they eat the emil. If someone bolshevize the bryon and the bryon unravel the francisca then the francisca reassail the bryon. If the francisca bolshevize the emil then the francisca is windless. If someone bolshevize the emil then they chase the francisca. The francisca reassail the bryon.", "logic": "\nUnravel(francisca, emil)\nBolshevize(francisca, bryon)\nTwinkling(francisca)\nAflutter(francisca)\nReassail(francisca, emil)\nWindless(bryon)\nUnravel(emil, bryon)\nforall x (Windless(x) and Bolshevize(x, bryon) -> Windless(bryon))\nReassail(emil, francisca) and Reassail(francisca, emil) -> Appetent(francisca)\nnot Bolshevize(emil, francisca) -> Bolshevize(emil, bryon)\nforall x (Bolshevize(x, bryon) -> Bolshevize(x, emil))\nforall x (Windless(x) -> Bolshevize(x, emil))\nforall x (Bolshevize(x, bryon) and Unravel(bryon, francisca) -> Reassail(francisca, bryon))\nBolshevize(francisca, emil) -> Windless(francisca)\nforall x (Bolshevize(x, emil) -> Unravel(x, francisca))\n\nReassail(francisca, bryon)\n\nWindless(bryon) and forall x (Windless(x) -> Bolshevize(x, emil)) -> therefore Bolshevize(bryon, emil) Bolshevize(bryon, emil) and forall x (Bolshevize(x, emil) -> Unravel(x, francisca)) -> therefore Unravel(bryon, francisca) Bolshevize(francisca, bryon) and Unravel(bryon, francisca) and forall x (Bolshevize(x, bryon) and Unravel(bryon, francisca) -> Reassail(francisca, bryon)) -> therefore Reassail(francisca, bryon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The nadean malversate the adel. The nadean winterize the vite. The nadean is bisontine. The nadean is honorable. The nadean hear the adel. The vite is epiphyseal. The adel malversate the vite. If someone is epiphyseal and they eat the vite then the vite is epiphyseal. If the adel hear the nadean and the nadean hear the adel then the nadean is lapidary. If the adel does not eat the nadean then the adel winterize the vite. If someone winterize the vite then they eat the adel. If someone is epiphyseal then they eat the adel. If someone winterize the vite and the vite malversate the nadean then the nadean hear the vite. If the nadean winterize the adel then the nadean is epiphyseal. If someone winterize the adel then they chase the nadean. The nadean does not like the vite.", "logic": "\nMalversate(nadean, adel)\nWinterize(nadean, vite)\nBisontine(nadean)\nHonorable(nadean)\nHear(nadean, adel)\nEpiphyseal(vite)\nMalversate(adel, vite)\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) and Winterize(x, vite) -> Epiphyseal(vite))\nHear(adel, nadean) and Hear(nadean, adel) -> Lapidary(nadean)\nnot Winterize(adel, nadean) -> Winterize(adel, vite)\nforall x (Winterize(x, vite) -> Winterize(x, adel))\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Winterize(x, adel))\nforall x (Winterize(x, vite) and Malversate(vite, nadean) -> Hear(nadean, vite))\nWinterize(nadean, adel) -> Epiphyseal(nadean)\nforall x (Winterize(x, adel) -> Malversate(x, nadean))\n\nnot Hear(nadean, vite)\n\nEpiphyseal(vite) and forall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Winterize(x, adel)) -> therefore Winterize(vite, adel) Winterize(vite, adel) and forall x (Winterize(x, adel) -> Malversate(x, nadean)) -> therefore Malversate(vite, nadean) Winterize(nadean, vite) and Malversate(vite, nadean) and forall x (Winterize(x, vite) and Malversate(vite, nadean) -> Hear(nadean, vite)) -> therefore Hear(nadean, vite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The kurtis word the quinlan. The kurtis blister the aguste. The kurtis is eldritch. The kurtis is feudal. The kurtis concuss the quinlan. The aguste is disabling. The quinlan word the aguste. If someone is disabling and they eat the aguste then the aguste is disabling. If the quinlan concuss the kurtis and the kurtis concuss the quinlan then the kurtis is silent. If the quinlan does not eat the kurtis then the quinlan blister the aguste. If someone blister the aguste then they eat the quinlan. If someone is disabling then they eat the quinlan. If someone blister the aguste and the aguste word the kurtis then the kurtis concuss the aguste. If the kurtis blister the quinlan then the kurtis is disabling. If someone blister the quinlan then they chase the kurtis. The kurtis is not silent.", "logic": "\nWord(kurtis, quinlan)\nBlister(kurtis, aguste)\nEldritch(kurtis)\nFeudal(kurtis)\nConcuss(kurtis, quinlan)\nDisabling(aguste)\nWord(quinlan, aguste)\nforall x (Disabling(x) and Blister(x, aguste) -> Disabling(aguste))\nConcuss(quinlan, kurtis) and Concuss(kurtis, quinlan) -> Silent(kurtis)\nnot Blister(quinlan, kurtis) -> Blister(quinlan, aguste)\nforall x (Blister(x, aguste) -> Blister(x, quinlan))\nforall x (Disabling(x) -> Blister(x, quinlan))\nforall x (Blister(x, aguste) and Word(aguste, kurtis) -> Concuss(kurtis, aguste))\nBlister(kurtis, quinlan) -> Disabling(kurtis)\nforall x (Blister(x, quinlan) -> Word(x, kurtis))\n\nnot Silent(kurtis)\n\nConcuss(quinlan, kurtis) and Concuss(kurtis, quinlan) -> Silent(kurtis) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The sal forgive the victoria. The sal spare the meghan. The sal is snappish. The sal is overarm. The sal numerate the victoria. The meghan is togged. The victoria forgive the meghan. If someone is togged and they eat the meghan then the meghan is togged. If the victoria numerate the sal and the sal numerate the victoria then the sal is exultant. If the victoria does not eat the sal then the victoria spare the meghan. If someone spare the meghan then they eat the victoria. If someone is togged then they eat the victoria. If someone spare the meghan and the meghan forgive the sal then the sal numerate the meghan. If the sal spare the victoria then the sal is togged. If someone spare the victoria then they chase the sal. The victoria forgive the sal.", "logic": "\nForgive(sal, victoria)\nSpare(sal, meghan)\nSnappish(sal)\nOverarm(sal)\nNumerate(sal, victoria)\nTogged(meghan)\nForgive(victoria, meghan)\nforall x (Togged(x) and Spare(x, meghan) -> Togged(meghan))\nNumerate(victoria, sal) and Numerate(sal, victoria) -> Exultant(sal)\nnot Spare(victoria, sal) -> Spare(victoria, meghan)\nforall x (Spare(x, meghan) -> Spare(x, victoria))\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Spare(x, victoria))\nforall x (Spare(x, meghan) and Forgive(meghan, sal) -> Numerate(sal, meghan))\nSpare(sal, victoria) -> Togged(sal)\nforall x (Spare(x, victoria) -> Forgive(x, sal))\n\nForgive(victoria, sal)\n\nforall x (Spare(x, victoria) -> Forgive(x, sal)) <- forall x (Spare(x, meghan) -> Spare(x, victoria)) <- not Spare(victoria, sal) -> Spare(victoria, meghan) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The mandie await the carlota. The mandie footslog the temple. The mandie is belated. The mandie is embonpoint. The mandie express the carlota. The temple is reflecting. The carlota await the temple. If someone is reflecting and they eat the temple then the temple is reflecting. If the carlota express the mandie and the mandie express the carlota then the mandie is pauline. If the carlota does not eat the mandie then the carlota footslog the temple. If someone footslog the temple then they eat the carlota. If someone is reflecting then they eat the carlota. If someone footslog the temple and the temple await the mandie then the mandie express the temple. If the mandie footslog the carlota then the mandie is reflecting. If someone footslog the carlota then they chase the mandie. The carlota does not eat the temple.", "logic": "\nAwait(mandie, carlota)\nFootslog(mandie, temple)\nBelated(mandie)\nEmbonpoint(mandie)\nExpress(mandie, carlota)\nReflecting(temple)\nAwait(carlota, temple)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Footslog(x, temple) -> Reflecting(temple))\nExpress(carlota, mandie) and Express(mandie, carlota) -> Pauline(mandie)\nnot Footslog(carlota, mandie) -> Footslog(carlota, temple)\nforall x (Footslog(x, temple) -> Footslog(x, carlota))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Footslog(x, carlota))\nforall x (Footslog(x, temple) and Await(temple, mandie) -> Express(mandie, temple))\nFootslog(mandie, carlota) -> Reflecting(mandie)\nforall x (Footslog(x, carlota) -> Await(x, mandie))\n\nnot Footslog(carlota, temple)\n\nnot Footslog(carlota, mandie) -> Footslog(carlota, temple) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The perceval examine the luci. The perceval brace the renelle. The perceval is addicted. The perceval is keynesian. The perceval adolesce the luci. The renelle is hadal. The luci examine the renelle. If someone is hadal and they eat the renelle then the renelle is hadal. If the luci adolesce the perceval and the perceval adolesce the luci then the perceval is fanlike. If the luci does not eat the perceval then the luci brace the renelle. If someone brace the renelle then they eat the luci. If someone is hadal then they eat the luci. If someone brace the renelle and the renelle examine the perceval then the perceval adolesce the renelle. If the perceval brace the luci then the perceval is hadal. If someone brace the luci then they chase the perceval. The luci brace the luci.", "logic": "\nExamine(perceval, luci)\nBrace(perceval, renelle)\nAddicted(perceval)\nKeynesian(perceval)\nAdolesce(perceval, luci)\nHadal(renelle)\nExamine(luci, renelle)\nforall x (Hadal(x) and Brace(x, renelle) -> Hadal(renelle))\nAdolesce(luci, perceval) and Adolesce(perceval, luci) -> Fanlike(perceval)\nnot Brace(luci, perceval) -> Brace(luci, renelle)\nforall x (Brace(x, renelle) -> Brace(x, luci))\nforall x (Hadal(x) -> Brace(x, luci))\nforall x (Brace(x, renelle) and Examine(renelle, perceval) -> Adolesce(perceval, renelle))\nBrace(perceval, luci) -> Hadal(perceval)\nforall x (Brace(x, luci) -> Examine(x, perceval))\n\nBrace(luci, luci)\n\nforall x (Brace(x, renelle) -> Brace(x, luci)) <- not Brace(luci, perceval) -> Brace(luci, renelle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The agathe triumph the aubrey. The agathe spare the thomasine. The agathe is prostyle. The agathe is repellant. The agathe aggrandise the aubrey. The thomasine is caring. The aubrey triumph the thomasine. If someone is caring and they eat the thomasine then the thomasine is caring. If the aubrey aggrandise the agathe and the agathe aggrandise the aubrey then the agathe is rangy. If the aubrey does not eat the agathe then the aubrey spare the thomasine. If someone spare the thomasine then they eat the aubrey. If someone is caring then they eat the aubrey. If someone spare the thomasine and the thomasine triumph the agathe then the agathe aggrandise the thomasine. If the agathe spare the aubrey then the agathe is caring. If someone spare the aubrey then they chase the agathe. The aubrey does not chase the aubrey.", "logic": "\nTriumph(agathe, aubrey)\nSpare(agathe, thomasine)\nProstyle(agathe)\nRepellant(agathe)\nAggrandise(agathe, aubrey)\nCaring(thomasine)\nTriumph(aubrey, thomasine)\nforall x (Caring(x) and Spare(x, thomasine) -> Caring(thomasine))\nAggrandise(aubrey, agathe) and Aggrandise(agathe, aubrey) -> Rangy(agathe)\nnot Spare(aubrey, agathe) -> Spare(aubrey, thomasine)\nforall x (Spare(x, thomasine) -> Spare(x, aubrey))\nforall x (Caring(x) -> Spare(x, aubrey))\nforall x (Spare(x, thomasine) and Triumph(thomasine, agathe) -> Aggrandise(agathe, thomasine))\nSpare(agathe, aubrey) -> Caring(agathe)\nforall x (Spare(x, aubrey) -> Triumph(x, agathe))\n\nnot Triumph(aubrey, aubrey)\n\nnot Triumph(aubrey, aubrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The corky sexualise the loren. The corky illumine the ross. The corky is hominian. The corky is striped. The corky sovietize the loren. The ross is stalkless. The loren sexualise the ross. If someone is stalkless and they eat the ross then the ross is stalkless. If the loren sovietize the corky and the corky sovietize the loren then the corky is weaned. If the loren does not eat the corky then the loren illumine the ross. If someone illumine the ross then they eat the loren. If someone is stalkless then they eat the loren. If someone illumine the ross and the ross sexualise the corky then the corky sovietize the ross. If the corky illumine the loren then the corky is stalkless. If someone illumine the loren then they chase the corky. The corky sovietize the corky.", "logic": "\nSexualise(corky, loren)\nIllumine(corky, ross)\nHominian(corky)\nStriped(corky)\nSovietize(corky, loren)\nStalkless(ross)\nSexualise(loren, ross)\nforall x (Stalkless(x) and Illumine(x, ross) -> Stalkless(ross))\nSovietize(loren, corky) and Sovietize(corky, loren) -> Weaned(corky)\nnot Illumine(loren, corky) -> Illumine(loren, ross)\nforall x (Illumine(x, ross) -> Illumine(x, loren))\nforall x (Stalkless(x) -> Illumine(x, loren))\nforall x (Illumine(x, ross) and Sexualise(ross, corky) -> Sovietize(corky, ross))\nIllumine(corky, loren) -> Stalkless(corky)\nforall x (Illumine(x, loren) -> Sexualise(x, corky))\n\nSovietize(corky, corky)\n\nSovietize(corky, corky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The sheilah bawl the jaquelin. The sheilah brief the ilene. The sheilah is romantic. The sheilah is semisoft. The sheilah mosh the jaquelin. The ilene is sunny. The jaquelin bawl the ilene. If someone is sunny and they eat the ilene then the ilene is sunny. If the jaquelin mosh the sheilah and the sheilah mosh the jaquelin then the sheilah is average. If the jaquelin does not eat the sheilah then the jaquelin brief the ilene. If someone brief the ilene then they eat the jaquelin. If someone is sunny then they eat the jaquelin. If someone brief the ilene and the ilene bawl the sheilah then the sheilah mosh the ilene. If the sheilah brief the jaquelin then the sheilah is sunny. If someone brief the jaquelin then they chase the sheilah. The sheilah does not eat the sheilah.", "logic": "\nBawl(sheilah, jaquelin)\nBrief(sheilah, ilene)\nRomantic(sheilah)\nSemisoft(sheilah)\nMosh(sheilah, jaquelin)\nSunny(ilene)\nBawl(jaquelin, ilene)\nforall x (Sunny(x) and Brief(x, ilene) -> Sunny(ilene))\nMosh(jaquelin, sheilah) and Mosh(sheilah, jaquelin) -> Average(sheilah)\nnot Brief(jaquelin, sheilah) -> Brief(jaquelin, ilene)\nforall x (Brief(x, ilene) -> Brief(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Sunny(x) -> Brief(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Brief(x, ilene) and Bawl(ilene, sheilah) -> Mosh(sheilah, ilene))\nBrief(sheilah, jaquelin) -> Sunny(sheilah)\nforall x (Brief(x, jaquelin) -> Bawl(x, sheilah))\n\nnot Brief(sheilah, sheilah)\n\nnot Brief(sheilah, sheilah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The bel logroll the simonne. The bel writhe the tybalt. The bel is seventeen. The bel is mucose. The bel interlope the simonne. The tybalt is pivotal. The simonne logroll the tybalt. If someone is pivotal and they eat the tybalt then the tybalt is pivotal. If the simonne interlope the bel and the bel interlope the simonne then the bel is dusky. If the simonne does not eat the bel then the simonne writhe the tybalt. If someone writhe the tybalt then they eat the simonne. If someone is pivotal then they eat the simonne. If someone writhe the tybalt and the tybalt logroll the bel then the bel interlope the tybalt. If the bel writhe the simonne then the bel is pivotal. If someone writhe the simonne then they chase the bel. The bel logroll the tybalt.", "logic": "\nLogroll(bel, simonne)\nWrithe(bel, tybalt)\nSeventeen(bel)\nMucose(bel)\nInterlope(bel, simonne)\nPivotal(tybalt)\nLogroll(simonne, tybalt)\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and Writhe(x, tybalt) -> Pivotal(tybalt))\nInterlope(simonne, bel) and Interlope(bel, simonne) -> Dusky(bel)\nnot Writhe(simonne, bel) -> Writhe(simonne, tybalt)\nforall x (Writhe(x, tybalt) -> Writhe(x, simonne))\nforall x (Pivotal(x) -> Writhe(x, simonne))\nforall x (Writhe(x, tybalt) and Logroll(tybalt, bel) -> Interlope(bel, tybalt))\nWrithe(bel, simonne) -> Pivotal(bel)\nforall x (Writhe(x, simonne) -> Logroll(x, bel))\n\nLogroll(bel, tybalt)\n\nLogroll(bel, tybalt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-891"} {"premises": "The art is spheroidal. The staford is spheroidal. The quinton is frothy. The shaun is indistinct. If someone ladder the shaun and they chase the staford then the staford is chargeable. If someone girdle the art then the art uproot the shaun. The shaun is indistinct.", "logic": "\nSpheroidal(art)\nSpheroidal(staford)\nFrothy(quinton)\nIndistinct(shaun)\nforall x (Ladder(x, shaun) and Ladder(x, staford) -> Chargeable(staford))\nforall x (Girdle(x, art) -> Uproot(art, shaun))\n\nIndistinct(shaun)\n\ntherefore Indistinct(shaun)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1693"} {"premises": "The belia is meteoritic. The shelba is meteoritic. The janina is endoscopic. The jose is steamed. If someone adjure the jose and they chase the shelba then the shelba is nonpolar. If someone widow the belia then the belia dice the jose. The belia is not meteoritic.", "logic": "\nMeteoritic(belia)\nMeteoritic(shelba)\nEndoscopic(janina)\nSteamed(jose)\nforall x (Adjure(x, jose) and Adjure(x, shelba) -> Nonpolar(shelba))\nforall x (Widow(x, belia) -> Dice(belia, jose))\n\nnot Meteoritic(belia)\n\ntherefore Meteoritic(belia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1693"} {"premises": "The tierney is lidless. The timothea is lidless. The shea is flyspeck. The brena is stertorous. If someone virilize the brena and they chase the timothea then the timothea is injectable. If someone pick the tierney then the tierney chondrify the brena. The tierney does not like the brena.", "logic": "\nLidless(tierney)\nLidless(timothea)\nFlyspeck(shea)\nStertorous(brena)\nforall x (Virilize(x, brena) and Virilize(x, timothea) -> Injectable(timothea))\nforall x (Pick(x, tierney) -> Chondrify(tierney, brena))\n\nnot Chondrify(tierney, brena)\n\nforall x (Pick(x, tierney) -> Chondrify(tierney, brena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1693"} {"premises": "The engelbart is merited. The urban is merited. The shir is nonracist. The luanna is hooked. If someone bivouac the luanna and they chase the urban then the urban is mistakable. If someone indurate the engelbart then the engelbart inflict the luanna. The engelbart indurate the urban.", "logic": "\nMerited(engelbart)\nMerited(urban)\nNonracist(shir)\nHooked(luanna)\nforall x (Bivouac(x, luanna) and Bivouac(x, urban) -> Mistakable(urban))\nforall x (Indurate(x, engelbart) -> Inflict(engelbart, luanna))\n\nIndurate(engelbart, urban)\n\nIndurate(engelbart, urban) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1693"} {"premises": "Flem is inapposite. Rodd is lobar. Wyn is lxxi. Carly is omissible. Green things are not lobar. All gifted things are inapposite. If something is lxxi and not lobar then it is gifted. All gifted things are humid. If something is lobar and not inapposite then it is humid. If something is lobar and not gifted then it is revised. Rodd is lobar.", "logic": "\nInapposite(flem)\nLobar(rodd)\nLxxi(wyn)\nOmissible(carly)\nforall x (Lxxi(x) -> not Lobar(x))\nforall x (Gifted(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) and not Lobar(x) -> Gifted(x))\nforall x (Gifted(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Lobar(x) and not Inapposite(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Lobar(x) and not Gifted(x) -> Revised(x))\n\nLobar(rodd)\n\ntherefore Lobar(rodd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Costa is sadducean. Stacey is reefy. Cindie is alliaceous. Charissa is ocher. Green things are not reefy. All fugly things are sadducean. If something is alliaceous and not reefy then it is fugly. All fugly things are unmannered. If something is reefy and not sadducean then it is unmannered. If something is reefy and not fugly then it is yellowed. Charissa is not ocher.", "logic": "\nSadducean(costa)\nReefy(stacey)\nAlliaceous(cindie)\nOcher(charissa)\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) -> not Reefy(x))\nforall x (Fugly(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) and not Reefy(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Fugly(x) -> Unmannered(x))\nforall x (Reefy(x) and not Sadducean(x) -> Unmannered(x))\nforall x (Reefy(x) and not Fugly(x) -> Yellowed(x))\n\nnot Ocher(charissa)\n\ntherefore Ocher(charissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Danelle is effusive. Sanderson is sporty. Penni is ominous. Angelia is unmingled. Green things are not sporty. All initiatory things are effusive. If something is ominous and not sporty then it is initiatory. All initiatory things are roaring. If something is sporty and not effusive then it is roaring. If something is sporty and not initiatory then it is caffeinic. Penni is not sporty.", "logic": "\nEffusive(danelle)\nSporty(sanderson)\nOminous(penni)\nUnmingled(angelia)\nforall x (Ominous(x) -> not Sporty(x))\nforall x (Initiatory(x) -> Effusive(x))\nforall x (Ominous(x) and not Sporty(x) -> Initiatory(x))\nforall x (Initiatory(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) and not Effusive(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) and not Initiatory(x) -> Caffeinic(x))\n\nnot Sporty(penni)\n\nOminous(penni) and forall x (Ominous(x) -> not Sporty(x)) -> therefore not Sporty(penni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Dacie is brunette. Cathyleen is shrivelled. Eugenie is phyletic. Raymundo is bituminous. Green things are not shrivelled. All sororal things are brunette. If something is phyletic and not shrivelled then it is sororal. All sororal things are poignant. If something is shrivelled and not brunette then it is poignant. If something is shrivelled and not sororal then it is existent. Eugenie is shrivelled.", "logic": "\nBrunette(dacie)\nShrivelled(cathyleen)\nPhyletic(eugenie)\nBituminous(raymundo)\nforall x (Phyletic(x) -> not Shrivelled(x))\nforall x (Sororal(x) -> Brunette(x))\nforall x (Phyletic(x) and not Shrivelled(x) -> Sororal(x))\nforall x (Sororal(x) -> Poignant(x))\nforall x (Shrivelled(x) and not Brunette(x) -> Poignant(x))\nforall x (Shrivelled(x) and not Sororal(x) -> Existent(x))\n\nShrivelled(eugenie)\n\nPhyletic(eugenie) and forall x (Phyletic(x) -> not Shrivelled(x)) -> therefore not Shrivelled(eugenie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Graeme is quavering. Giavani is disguised. Jeanelle is knowable. Matty is estrogenic. Green things are not disguised. All intact things are quavering. If something is knowable and not disguised then it is intact. All intact things are thenar. If something is disguised and not quavering then it is thenar. If something is disguised and not intact then it is convoluted. Jeanelle is intact.", "logic": "\nQuavering(graeme)\nDisguised(giavani)\nKnowable(jeanelle)\nEstrogenic(matty)\nforall x (Knowable(x) -> not Disguised(x))\nforall x (Intact(x) -> Quavering(x))\nforall x (Knowable(x) and not Disguised(x) -> Intact(x))\nforall x (Intact(x) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and not Quavering(x) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Disguised(x) and not Intact(x) -> Convoluted(x))\n\nIntact(jeanelle)\n\nKnowable(jeanelle) and forall x (Knowable(x) -> not Disguised(x)) -> therefore not Disguised(jeanelle) Knowable(jeanelle) and not Disguised(jeanelle) and forall x (Knowable(x) and not Disguised(x) -> Intact(x)) -> therefore Intact(jeanelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Aleen is cragged. Teador is biting. Fabio is real. Edy is mutilated. Green things are not biting. All incident things are cragged. If something is real and not biting then it is incident. All incident things are cagey. If something is biting and not cragged then it is cagey. If something is biting and not incident then it is chorionic. Fabio is not incident.", "logic": "\nCragged(aleen)\nBiting(teador)\nReal(fabio)\nMutilated(edy)\nforall x (Real(x) -> not Biting(x))\nforall x (Incident(x) -> Cragged(x))\nforall x (Real(x) and not Biting(x) -> Incident(x))\nforall x (Incident(x) -> Cagey(x))\nforall x (Biting(x) and not Cragged(x) -> Cagey(x))\nforall x (Biting(x) and not Incident(x) -> Chorionic(x))\n\nnot Incident(fabio)\n\nReal(fabio) and forall x (Real(x) -> not Biting(x)) -> therefore not Biting(fabio) Real(fabio) and not Biting(fabio) and forall x (Real(x) and not Biting(x) -> Incident(x)) -> therefore Incident(fabio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Danita is marine. Leonidas is woollen. Cris is raffish. Lloyd is arborical. Green things are not woollen. All pycnotic things are marine. If something is raffish and not woollen then it is pycnotic. All pycnotic things are tokenish. If something is woollen and not marine then it is tokenish. If something is woollen and not pycnotic then it is bubbling. Cris is marine.", "logic": "\nMarine(danita)\nWoollen(leonidas)\nRaffish(cris)\nArborical(lloyd)\nforall x (Raffish(x) -> not Woollen(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Marine(x))\nforall x (Raffish(x) and not Woollen(x) -> Pycnotic(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Tokenish(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) and not Marine(x) -> Tokenish(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) and not Pycnotic(x) -> Bubbling(x))\n\nMarine(cris)\n\nRaffish(cris) and forall x (Raffish(x) -> not Woollen(x)) -> therefore not Woollen(cris) Raffish(cris) and not Woollen(cris) and forall x (Raffish(x) and not Woollen(x) -> Pycnotic(x)) -> therefore Pycnotic(cris) Pycnotic(cris) and forall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Marine(x)) -> therefore Marine(cris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Ardyth is enveloping. Sasha is blowzy. Ardith is satellite. Nilson is mesophytic. Green things are not blowzy. All incumbent things are enveloping. If something is satellite and not blowzy then it is incumbent. All incumbent things are whiskery. If something is blowzy and not enveloping then it is whiskery. If something is blowzy and not incumbent then it is fungible. Ardith is not whiskery.", "logic": "\nEnveloping(ardyth)\nBlowzy(sasha)\nSatellite(ardith)\nMesophytic(nilson)\nforall x (Satellite(x) -> not Blowzy(x))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) -> Enveloping(x))\nforall x (Satellite(x) and not Blowzy(x) -> Incumbent(x))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) -> Whiskery(x))\nforall x (Blowzy(x) and not Enveloping(x) -> Whiskery(x))\nforall x (Blowzy(x) and not Incumbent(x) -> Fungible(x))\n\nnot Whiskery(ardith)\n\nSatellite(ardith) and forall x (Satellite(x) -> not Blowzy(x)) -> therefore not Blowzy(ardith) Satellite(ardith) and not Blowzy(ardith) and forall x (Satellite(x) and not Blowzy(x) -> Incumbent(x)) -> therefore Incumbent(ardith) Incumbent(ardith) and forall x (Incumbent(x) -> Whiskery(x)) -> therefore Whiskery(ardith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Roselia is triennial. Davis is spellbound. Dode is placative. Dorie is prepaid. Green things are not spellbound. All italic things are triennial. If something is placative and not spellbound then it is italic. All italic things are branching. If something is spellbound and not triennial then it is branching. If something is spellbound and not italic then it is sanguine. Davis is not triennial.", "logic": "\nTriennial(roselia)\nSpellbound(davis)\nPlacative(dode)\nPrepaid(dorie)\nforall x (Placative(x) -> not Spellbound(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Triennial(x))\nforall x (Placative(x) and not Spellbound(x) -> Italic(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Branching(x))\nforall x (Spellbound(x) and not Triennial(x) -> Branching(x))\nforall x (Spellbound(x) and not Italic(x) -> Sanguine(x))\n\nnot Triennial(davis)\n\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Triennial(x)) <- forall x (Placative(x) and not Spellbound(x) -> Italic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Evita is extravert. Pete is gibbous. Monique is seamy. Jory is menial. Green things are not gibbous. All untrimmed things are extravert. If something is seamy and not gibbous then it is untrimmed. All untrimmed things are ungulate. If something is gibbous and not extravert then it is ungulate. If something is gibbous and not untrimmed then it is releasing. Jory is releasing.", "logic": "\nExtravert(evita)\nGibbous(pete)\nSeamy(monique)\nMenial(jory)\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> not Gibbous(x))\nforall x (Untrimmed(x) -> Extravert(x))\nforall x (Seamy(x) and not Gibbous(x) -> Untrimmed(x))\nforall x (Untrimmed(x) -> Ungulate(x))\nforall x (Gibbous(x) and not Extravert(x) -> Ungulate(x))\nforall x (Gibbous(x) and not Untrimmed(x) -> Releasing(x))\n\nReleasing(jory)\n\nforall x (Gibbous(x) and not Untrimmed(x) -> Releasing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Cookie is sideways. Antoni is extrinsic. Pam is handsewn. Lyssa is crispate. Green things are not extrinsic. All perennial things are sideways. If something is handsewn and not extrinsic then it is perennial. All perennial things are noncyclic. If something is extrinsic and not sideways then it is noncyclic. If something is extrinsic and not perennial then it is clipped. Antoni is not clipped.", "logic": "\nSideways(cookie)\nExtrinsic(antoni)\nHandsewn(pam)\nCrispate(lyssa)\nforall x (Handsewn(x) -> not Extrinsic(x))\nforall x (Perennial(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) and not Extrinsic(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Perennial(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) and not Sideways(x) -> Noncyclic(x))\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) and not Perennial(x) -> Clipped(x))\n\nnot Clipped(antoni)\n\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) and not Perennial(x) -> Clipped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Silvanus is combinable. Brianne is adnexal. Barr is plural. Oral is liquescent. Green things are not adnexal. All ionized things are combinable. If something is plural and not adnexal then it is ionized. All ionized things are bully. If something is adnexal and not combinable then it is bully. If something is adnexal and not ionized then it is finnish. Barr is finnish.", "logic": "\nCombinable(silvanus)\nAdnexal(brianne)\nPlural(barr)\nLiquescent(oral)\nforall x (Plural(x) -> not Adnexal(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Combinable(x))\nforall x (Plural(x) and not Adnexal(x) -> Ionized(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Bully(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) and not Combinable(x) -> Bully(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) and not Ionized(x) -> Finnish(x))\n\nFinnish(barr)\n\nforall x (Adnexal(x) and not Ionized(x) -> Finnish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Agace is abatable. Juliette is painless. Imogen is pectoral. Melly is rectified. Green things are not painless. All upland things are abatable. If something is pectoral and not painless then it is upland. All upland things are mechanical. If something is painless and not abatable then it is mechanical. If something is painless and not upland then it is ancillary. Agace is not painless.", "logic": "\nAbatable(agace)\nPainless(juliette)\nPectoral(imogen)\nRectified(melly)\nforall x (Pectoral(x) -> not Painless(x))\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Abatable(x))\nforall x (Pectoral(x) and not Painless(x) -> Upland(x))\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Mechanical(x))\nforall x (Painless(x) and not Abatable(x) -> Mechanical(x))\nforall x (Painless(x) and not Upland(x) -> Ancillary(x))\n\nnot Painless(agace)\n\nnot Painless(agace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Zelma is disarming. Cele is bivalve. Angeline is olfactory. Goldy is secure. Green things are not bivalve. All nonracial things are disarming. If something is olfactory and not bivalve then it is nonracial. All nonracial things are touristy. If something is bivalve and not disarming then it is touristy. If something is bivalve and not nonracial then it is aphonic. Cele is secure.", "logic": "\nDisarming(zelma)\nBivalve(cele)\nOlfactory(angeline)\nSecure(goldy)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) -> not Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Nonracial(x) -> Disarming(x))\nforall x (Olfactory(x) and not Bivalve(x) -> Nonracial(x))\nforall x (Nonracial(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) and not Disarming(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) and not Nonracial(x) -> Aphonic(x))\n\nSecure(cele)\n\nSecure(cele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Willamina is groveling. Orbadiah is clarion. Rob is macho. Stevie is zenithal. Green things are not clarion. All germanic things are groveling. If something is macho and not clarion then it is germanic. All germanic things are agitating. If something is clarion and not groveling then it is agitating. If something is clarion and not germanic then it is creepy. Stevie is not clarion.", "logic": "\nGroveling(willamina)\nClarion(orbadiah)\nMacho(rob)\nZenithal(stevie)\nforall x (Macho(x) -> not Clarion(x))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Groveling(x))\nforall x (Macho(x) and not Clarion(x) -> Germanic(x))\nforall x (Germanic(x) -> Agitating(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and not Groveling(x) -> Agitating(x))\nforall x (Clarion(x) and not Germanic(x) -> Creepy(x))\n\nnot Clarion(stevie)\n\nnot Clarion(stevie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Melba is maidenly. Alfonso is structural. Irena is tenderized. Wat is korean. Green things are not structural. All exhausting things are maidenly. If something is tenderized and not structural then it is exhausting. All exhausting things are jumbled. If something is structural and not maidenly then it is jumbled. If something is structural and not exhausting then it is modest. Alfonso is tenderized.", "logic": "\nMaidenly(melba)\nStructural(alfonso)\nTenderized(irena)\nKorean(wat)\nforall x (Tenderized(x) -> not Structural(x))\nforall x (Exhausting(x) -> Maidenly(x))\nforall x (Tenderized(x) and not Structural(x) -> Exhausting(x))\nforall x (Exhausting(x) -> Jumbled(x))\nforall x (Structural(x) and not Maidenly(x) -> Jumbled(x))\nforall x (Structural(x) and not Exhausting(x) -> Modest(x))\n\nTenderized(alfonso)\n\nTenderized(alfonso) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1562"} {"premises": "Ammamaria is allocable. Ammamaria is unadvised. Ammamaria is evident. Barron is lovesome. Barron is granular. Joanna is disunited. Joanna is evident. If someone is allocable and unadvised then they are lovesome. If someone is lovesome and rose then they are granular. All evident, lovesome people are rose. Ammamaria is evident.", "logic": "\nAllocable(ammamaria)\nUnadvised(ammamaria)\nEvident(ammamaria)\nLovesome(barron)\nGranular(barron)\nDisunited(joanna)\nEvident(joanna)\nforall x (Allocable(x) and Unadvised(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Lovesome(x) and Rose(x) -> Granular(x))\nforall x (Evident(x) and Lovesome(x) -> Rose(x))\n\nEvident(ammamaria)\n\ntherefore Evident(ammamaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Sidoney is cuban. Sidoney is ungeared. Sidoney is gustative. Glennis is tireless. Glennis is meaning. Joanna is dazzled. Joanna is gustative. If someone is cuban and ungeared then they are tireless. If someone is tireless and tailed then they are meaning. All gustative, tireless people are tailed. Glennis is not tireless.", "logic": "\nCuban(sidoney)\nUngeared(sidoney)\nGustative(sidoney)\nTireless(glennis)\nMeaning(glennis)\nDazzled(joanna)\nGustative(joanna)\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Ungeared(x) -> Tireless(x))\nforall x (Tireless(x) and Tailed(x) -> Meaning(x))\nforall x (Gustative(x) and Tireless(x) -> Tailed(x))\n\nnot Tireless(glennis)\n\ntherefore Tireless(glennis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Kirbie is lapidarian. Kirbie is soughing. Kirbie is becoming. Hari is reflecting. Hari is biennial. Sascha is childlike. Sascha is becoming. If someone is lapidarian and soughing then they are reflecting. If someone is reflecting and mansard then they are biennial. All becoming, reflecting people are mansard. Kirbie is reflecting.", "logic": "\nLapidarian(kirbie)\nSoughing(kirbie)\nBecoming(kirbie)\nReflecting(hari)\nBiennial(hari)\nChildlike(sascha)\nBecoming(sascha)\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) and Soughing(x) -> Reflecting(x))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Mansard(x) -> Biennial(x))\nforall x (Becoming(x) and Reflecting(x) -> Mansard(x))\n\nReflecting(kirbie)\n\nLapidarian(kirbie) and Soughing(kirbie) and forall x (Lapidarian(x) and Soughing(x) -> Reflecting(x)) -> therefore Reflecting(kirbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Benjy is starving. Benjy is submerged. Benjy is vehicular. Maggee is lvii. Maggee is anarchic. Bjorn is palatable. Bjorn is vehicular. If someone is starving and submerged then they are lvii. If someone is lvii and convulsive then they are anarchic. All vehicular, lvii people are convulsive. Benjy is not lvii.", "logic": "\nStarving(benjy)\nSubmerged(benjy)\nVehicular(benjy)\nLvii(maggee)\nAnarchic(maggee)\nPalatable(bjorn)\nVehicular(bjorn)\nforall x (Starving(x) and Submerged(x) -> Lvii(x))\nforall x (Lvii(x) and Convulsive(x) -> Anarchic(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) and Lvii(x) -> Convulsive(x))\n\nnot Lvii(benjy)\n\nStarving(benjy) and Submerged(benjy) and forall x (Starving(x) and Submerged(x) -> Lvii(x)) -> therefore Lvii(benjy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Laurice is branching. Laurice is cyanophyte. Laurice is afire. Ivonne is myoid. Ivonne is farfetched. Carmelle is amerindic. Carmelle is afire. If someone is branching and cyanophyte then they are myoid. If someone is myoid and meritable then they are farfetched. All afire, myoid people are meritable. Laurice is meritable.", "logic": "\nBranching(laurice)\nCyanophyte(laurice)\nAfire(laurice)\nMyoid(ivonne)\nFarfetched(ivonne)\nAmerindic(carmelle)\nAfire(carmelle)\nforall x (Branching(x) and Cyanophyte(x) -> Myoid(x))\nforall x (Myoid(x) and Meritable(x) -> Farfetched(x))\nforall x (Afire(x) and Myoid(x) -> Meritable(x))\n\nMeritable(laurice)\n\nBranching(laurice) and Cyanophyte(laurice) and forall x (Branching(x) and Cyanophyte(x) -> Myoid(x)) -> therefore Myoid(laurice) Afire(laurice) and Myoid(laurice) and forall x (Afire(x) and Myoid(x) -> Meritable(x)) -> therefore Meritable(laurice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Kacie is maniac. Kacie is practised. Kacie is perennial. Samuele is futureless. Samuele is fungicidal. Yetta is vegetative. Yetta is perennial. If someone is maniac and practised then they are futureless. If someone is futureless and rushy then they are fungicidal. All perennial, futureless people are rushy. Kacie is not rushy.", "logic": "\nManiac(kacie)\nPractised(kacie)\nPerennial(kacie)\nFutureless(samuele)\nFungicidal(samuele)\nVegetative(yetta)\nPerennial(yetta)\nforall x (Maniac(x) and Practised(x) -> Futureless(x))\nforall x (Futureless(x) and Rushy(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Perennial(x) and Futureless(x) -> Rushy(x))\n\nnot Rushy(kacie)\n\nManiac(kacie) and Practised(kacie) and forall x (Maniac(x) and Practised(x) -> Futureless(x)) -> therefore Futureless(kacie) Perennial(kacie) and Futureless(kacie) and forall x (Perennial(x) and Futureless(x) -> Rushy(x)) -> therefore Rushy(kacie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Greg is fussy. Greg is opaline. Greg is uncertain. Joelynn is bipartisan. Joelynn is scraggly. Wat is toothsome. Wat is uncertain. If someone is fussy and opaline then they are bipartisan. If someone is bipartisan and protective then they are scraggly. All uncertain, bipartisan people are protective. Greg is scraggly.", "logic": "\nFussy(greg)\nOpaline(greg)\nUncertain(greg)\nBipartisan(joelynn)\nScraggly(joelynn)\nToothsome(wat)\nUncertain(wat)\nforall x (Fussy(x) and Opaline(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Protective(x) -> Scraggly(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Protective(x))\n\nScraggly(greg)\n\nFussy(greg) and Opaline(greg) and forall x (Fussy(x) and Opaline(x) -> Bipartisan(x)) -> therefore Bipartisan(greg) Fussy(greg) and Opaline(greg) and forall x (Fussy(x) and Opaline(x) -> Bipartisan(x)) -> therefore Bipartisan(greg) Uncertain(greg) and Bipartisan(greg) and forall x (Uncertain(x) and Bipartisan(x) -> Protective(x)) -> therefore Protective(greg) Bipartisan(greg) and Protective(greg) and forall x (Bipartisan(x) and Protective(x) -> Scraggly(x)) -> therefore Scraggly(greg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Mahesh is subclavian. Mahesh is expositive. Mahesh is tetanic. Kostas is surging. Kostas is podlike. Stan is pouched. Stan is tetanic. If someone is subclavian and expositive then they are surging. If someone is surging and slashed then they are podlike. All tetanic, surging people are slashed. Mahesh is not podlike.", "logic": "\nSubclavian(mahesh)\nExpositive(mahesh)\nTetanic(mahesh)\nSurging(kostas)\nPodlike(kostas)\nPouched(stan)\nTetanic(stan)\nforall x (Subclavian(x) and Expositive(x) -> Surging(x))\nforall x (Surging(x) and Slashed(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Tetanic(x) and Surging(x) -> Slashed(x))\n\nnot Podlike(mahesh)\n\nSubclavian(mahesh) and Expositive(mahesh) and forall x (Subclavian(x) and Expositive(x) -> Surging(x)) -> therefore Surging(mahesh) Subclavian(mahesh) and Expositive(mahesh) and forall x (Subclavian(x) and Expositive(x) -> Surging(x)) -> therefore Surging(mahesh) Tetanic(mahesh) and Surging(mahesh) and forall x (Tetanic(x) and Surging(x) -> Slashed(x)) -> therefore Slashed(mahesh) Surging(mahesh) and Slashed(mahesh) and forall x (Surging(x) and Slashed(x) -> Podlike(x)) -> therefore Podlike(mahesh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Belicia is mineral. Belicia is straggling. Belicia is conventual. Herb is unratified. Herb is mucoidal. Sherwynd is soigne. Sherwynd is conventual. If someone is mineral and straggling then they are unratified. If someone is unratified and exceeding then they are mucoidal. All conventual, unratified people are exceeding. Sherwynd is not unratified.", "logic": "\nMineral(belicia)\nStraggling(belicia)\nConventual(belicia)\nUnratified(herb)\nMucoidal(herb)\nSoigne(sherwynd)\nConventual(sherwynd)\nforall x (Mineral(x) and Straggling(x) -> Unratified(x))\nforall x (Unratified(x) and Exceeding(x) -> Mucoidal(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and Unratified(x) -> Exceeding(x))\n\nnot Unratified(sherwynd)\n\nforall x (Mineral(x) and Straggling(x) -> Unratified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Emmalynne is infallible. Emmalynne is daredevil. Emmalynne is proximal. Moya is sinuate. Moya is epiphysial. Agnese is untipped. Agnese is proximal. If someone is infallible and daredevil then they are sinuate. If someone is sinuate and antarctic then they are epiphysial. All proximal, sinuate people are antarctic. Moya is antarctic.", "logic": "\nInfallible(emmalynne)\nDaredevil(emmalynne)\nProximal(emmalynne)\nSinuate(moya)\nEpiphysial(moya)\nUntipped(agnese)\nProximal(agnese)\nforall x (Infallible(x) and Daredevil(x) -> Sinuate(x))\nforall x (Sinuate(x) and Antarctic(x) -> Epiphysial(x))\nforall x (Proximal(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Antarctic(x))\n\nAntarctic(moya)\n\nforall x (Proximal(x) and Sinuate(x) -> Antarctic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Joyan is reactive. Joyan is handheld. Joyan is katabolic. Ragnar is murmuring. Ragnar is separated. Wood is doomed. Wood is katabolic. If someone is reactive and handheld then they are murmuring. If someone is murmuring and world then they are separated. All katabolic, murmuring people are world. Wood is not world.", "logic": "\nReactive(joyan)\nHandheld(joyan)\nKatabolic(joyan)\nMurmuring(ragnar)\nSeparated(ragnar)\nDoomed(wood)\nKatabolic(wood)\nforall x (Reactive(x) and Handheld(x) -> Murmuring(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) and World(x) -> Separated(x))\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and Murmuring(x) -> World(x))\n\nnot World(wood)\n\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and Murmuring(x) -> World(x)) <- forall x (Reactive(x) and Handheld(x) -> Murmuring(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Kelcy is autarchic. Kelcy is paying. Kelcy is remediable. Shaylynn is unsociable. Shaylynn is modern. Philippa is homocyclic. Philippa is remediable. If someone is autarchic and paying then they are unsociable. If someone is unsociable and sundried then they are modern. All remediable, unsociable people are sundried. Philippa is modern.", "logic": "\nAutarchic(kelcy)\nPaying(kelcy)\nRemediable(kelcy)\nUnsociable(shaylynn)\nModern(shaylynn)\nHomocyclic(philippa)\nRemediable(philippa)\nforall x (Autarchic(x) and Paying(x) -> Unsociable(x))\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Sundried(x) -> Modern(x))\nforall x (Remediable(x) and Unsociable(x) -> Sundried(x))\n\nModern(philippa)\n\nforall x (Unsociable(x) and Sundried(x) -> Modern(x)) <- forall x (Autarchic(x) and Paying(x) -> Unsociable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Eddie is nipping. Eddie is offending. Eddie is reanimated. Rita is braky. Rita is bifoliate. Roland is weakened. Roland is reanimated. If someone is nipping and offending then they are braky. If someone is braky and uncreased then they are bifoliate. All reanimated, braky people are uncreased. Eddie is not weakened.", "logic": "\nNipping(eddie)\nOffending(eddie)\nReanimated(eddie)\nBraky(rita)\nBifoliate(rita)\nWeakened(roland)\nReanimated(roland)\nforall x (Nipping(x) and Offending(x) -> Braky(x))\nforall x (Braky(x) and Uncreased(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Reanimated(x) and Braky(x) -> Uncreased(x))\n\nnot Weakened(eddie)\n\nnot Weakened(eddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Clint is systematic. Clint is startled. Clint is banded. Jocelyn is rushlike. Jocelyn is tolerant. Jere is stained. Jere is banded. If someone is systematic and startled then they are rushlike. If someone is rushlike and unsure then they are tolerant. All banded, rushlike people are unsure. Jocelyn is startled.", "logic": "\nSystematic(clint)\nStartled(clint)\nBanded(clint)\nRushlike(jocelyn)\nTolerant(jocelyn)\nStained(jere)\nBanded(jere)\nforall x (Systematic(x) and Startled(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Rushlike(x) and Unsure(x) -> Tolerant(x))\nforall x (Banded(x) and Rushlike(x) -> Unsure(x))\n\nStartled(jocelyn)\n\nStartled(jocelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Wyatt is parttime. Wyatt is esophageal. Wyatt is fathomable. Welsh is manifold. Welsh is aboulic. Zorina is muzzy. Zorina is fathomable. If someone is parttime and esophageal then they are manifold. If someone is manifold and unhurt then they are aboulic. All fathomable, manifold people are unhurt. Welsh is not fathomable.", "logic": "\nParttime(wyatt)\nEsophageal(wyatt)\nFathomable(wyatt)\nManifold(welsh)\nAboulic(welsh)\nMuzzy(zorina)\nFathomable(zorina)\nforall x (Parttime(x) and Esophageal(x) -> Manifold(x))\nforall x (Manifold(x) and Unhurt(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) and Manifold(x) -> Unhurt(x))\n\nnot Fathomable(welsh)\n\nnot Fathomable(welsh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Arlana is textual. Arlana is jeering. Arlana is maidenly. Darla is indurate. Darla is figured. Dulcy is sprawling. Dulcy is maidenly. If someone is textual and jeering then they are indurate. If someone is indurate and planetal then they are figured. All maidenly, indurate people are planetal. Dulcy is jeering.", "logic": "\nTextual(arlana)\nJeering(arlana)\nMaidenly(arlana)\nIndurate(darla)\nFigured(darla)\nSprawling(dulcy)\nMaidenly(dulcy)\nforall x (Textual(x) and Jeering(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Planetal(x) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Maidenly(x) and Indurate(x) -> Planetal(x))\n\nJeering(dulcy)\n\nJeering(dulcy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Kerianne is affirmable. Kristyn is oleophobic. Tomiko is saprozoic. If Tomiko is affirmable then Tomiko is dormie. If Kerianne is covert then Kerianne is oleophobic. If someone is accoutered and viennese then they are dormie. Quiet people are accoutered. All affirmable, dormie people are saprozoic. If Kerianne is affirmable and Kerianne is accoutered then Kerianne is viennese. Tomiko is saprozoic.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(kerianne)\nOleophobic(kristyn)\nSaprozoic(tomiko)\nAffirmable(tomiko) -> Dormie(tomiko)\nCovert(kerianne) -> Oleophobic(kerianne)\nforall x (Accoutered(x) and Viennese(x) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Accoutered(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) and Dormie(x) -> Saprozoic(x))\nAffirmable(kerianne) and Accoutered(kerianne) -> Viennese(kerianne)\n\nSaprozoic(tomiko)\n\ntherefore Saprozoic(tomiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Emile is shortened. Marven is unclothed. Kial is bareback. If Kial is shortened then Kial is trilobed. If Emile is rackety then Emile is unclothed. If someone is mucous and avertible then they are trilobed. Quiet people are mucous. All shortened, trilobed people are bareback. If Emile is shortened and Emile is mucous then Emile is avertible. Kial is not bareback.", "logic": "\nShortened(emile)\nUnclothed(marven)\nBareback(kial)\nShortened(kial) -> Trilobed(kial)\nRackety(emile) -> Unclothed(emile)\nforall x (Mucous(x) and Avertible(x) -> Trilobed(x))\nforall x (Shortened(x) -> Mucous(x))\nforall x (Shortened(x) and Trilobed(x) -> Bareback(x))\nShortened(emile) and Mucous(emile) -> Avertible(emile)\n\nnot Bareback(kial)\n\ntherefore Bareback(kial)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Kanya is inharmonic. Emlynne is artificial. Arnoldo is vexed. If Arnoldo is inharmonic then Arnoldo is endozoic. If Kanya is professed then Kanya is artificial. If someone is balsamic and sixpenny then they are endozoic. Quiet people are balsamic. All inharmonic, endozoic people are vexed. If Kanya is inharmonic and Kanya is balsamic then Kanya is sixpenny. Kanya is balsamic.", "logic": "\nInharmonic(kanya)\nArtificial(emlynne)\nVexed(arnoldo)\nInharmonic(arnoldo) -> Endozoic(arnoldo)\nProfessed(kanya) -> Artificial(kanya)\nforall x (Balsamic(x) and Sixpenny(x) -> Endozoic(x))\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Balsamic(x))\nforall x (Inharmonic(x) and Endozoic(x) -> Vexed(x))\nInharmonic(kanya) and Balsamic(kanya) -> Sixpenny(kanya)\n\nBalsamic(kanya)\n\nInharmonic(kanya) and forall x (Inharmonic(x) -> Balsamic(x)) -> therefore Balsamic(kanya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Elbert is rootbound. Arie is dapper. Johnathon is ephemeral. If Johnathon is rootbound then Johnathon is obsessive. If Elbert is stimulant then Elbert is dapper. If someone is live and some then they are obsessive. Quiet people are live. All rootbound, obsessive people are ephemeral. If Elbert is rootbound and Elbert is live then Elbert is some. Elbert is not live.", "logic": "\nRootbound(elbert)\nDapper(arie)\nEphemeral(johnathon)\nRootbound(johnathon) -> Obsessive(johnathon)\nStimulant(elbert) -> Dapper(elbert)\nforall x (Live(x) and Some(x) -> Obsessive(x))\nforall x (Rootbound(x) -> Live(x))\nforall x (Rootbound(x) and Obsessive(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nRootbound(elbert) and Live(elbert) -> Some(elbert)\n\nnot Live(elbert)\n\nRootbound(elbert) and forall x (Rootbound(x) -> Live(x)) -> therefore Live(elbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Vivia is rear. Nikki is taupe. Gladys is unforced. If Gladys is rear then Gladys is preemptive. If Vivia is romanian then Vivia is taupe. If someone is undrawn and heavy then they are preemptive. Quiet people are undrawn. All rear, preemptive people are unforced. If Vivia is rear and Vivia is undrawn then Vivia is heavy. Vivia is heavy.", "logic": "\nRear(vivia)\nTaupe(nikki)\nUnforced(gladys)\nRear(gladys) -> Preemptive(gladys)\nRomanian(vivia) -> Taupe(vivia)\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Heavy(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Undrawn(x))\nforall x (Rear(x) and Preemptive(x) -> Unforced(x))\nRear(vivia) and Undrawn(vivia) -> Heavy(vivia)\n\nHeavy(vivia)\n\nRear(vivia) and forall x (Rear(x) -> Undrawn(x)) -> therefore Undrawn(vivia) Rear(vivia) and Undrawn(vivia) and Rear(vivia) and Undrawn(vivia) -> Heavy(vivia) -> therefore Heavy(vivia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Annabel is cubistic. Lilias is ersatz. Joyan is weblike. If Joyan is cubistic then Joyan is putrid. If Annabel is algonkian then Annabel is ersatz. If someone is oral and subliminal then they are putrid. Quiet people are oral. All cubistic, putrid people are weblike. If Annabel is cubistic and Annabel is oral then Annabel is subliminal. Annabel is not subliminal.", "logic": "\nCubistic(annabel)\nErsatz(lilias)\nWeblike(joyan)\nCubistic(joyan) -> Putrid(joyan)\nAlgonkian(annabel) -> Ersatz(annabel)\nforall x (Oral(x) and Subliminal(x) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Cubistic(x) -> Oral(x))\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Putrid(x) -> Weblike(x))\nCubistic(annabel) and Oral(annabel) -> Subliminal(annabel)\n\nnot Subliminal(annabel)\n\nCubistic(annabel) and forall x (Cubistic(x) -> Oral(x)) -> therefore Oral(annabel) Cubistic(annabel) and Oral(annabel) and Cubistic(annabel) and Oral(annabel) -> Subliminal(annabel) -> therefore Subliminal(annabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Kathi is executive. Nonie is jellied. Davidde is pitiful. If Davidde is executive then Davidde is massive. If Kathi is maidenly then Kathi is jellied. If someone is congenial and lusterless then they are massive. Quiet people are congenial. All executive, massive people are pitiful. If Kathi is executive and Kathi is congenial then Kathi is lusterless. Kathi is massive.", "logic": "\nExecutive(kathi)\nJellied(nonie)\nPitiful(davidde)\nExecutive(davidde) -> Massive(davidde)\nMaidenly(kathi) -> Jellied(kathi)\nforall x (Congenial(x) and Lusterless(x) -> Massive(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) -> Congenial(x))\nforall x (Executive(x) and Massive(x) -> Pitiful(x))\nExecutive(kathi) and Congenial(kathi) -> Lusterless(kathi)\n\nMassive(kathi)\n\nExecutive(kathi) and forall x (Executive(x) -> Congenial(x)) -> therefore Congenial(kathi) Executive(kathi) and forall x (Executive(x) -> Congenial(x)) -> therefore Congenial(kathi) Executive(kathi) and Congenial(kathi) and Executive(kathi) and Congenial(kathi) -> Lusterless(kathi) -> therefore Lusterless(kathi) Congenial(kathi) and Lusterless(kathi) and forall x (Congenial(x) and Lusterless(x) -> Massive(x)) -> therefore Massive(kathi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Reggy is lukewarm. Koressa is buried. Vinita is deadened. If Vinita is lukewarm then Vinita is pungent. If Reggy is acephalous then Reggy is buried. If someone is activistic and dendritic then they are pungent. Quiet people are activistic. All lukewarm, pungent people are deadened. If Reggy is lukewarm and Reggy is activistic then Reggy is dendritic. Reggy is not pungent.", "logic": "\nLukewarm(reggy)\nBuried(koressa)\nDeadened(vinita)\nLukewarm(vinita) -> Pungent(vinita)\nAcephalous(reggy) -> Buried(reggy)\nforall x (Activistic(x) and Dendritic(x) -> Pungent(x))\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) -> Activistic(x))\nforall x (Lukewarm(x) and Pungent(x) -> Deadened(x))\nLukewarm(reggy) and Activistic(reggy) -> Dendritic(reggy)\n\nnot Pungent(reggy)\n\nLukewarm(reggy) and forall x (Lukewarm(x) -> Activistic(x)) -> therefore Activistic(reggy) Lukewarm(reggy) and forall x (Lukewarm(x) -> Activistic(x)) -> therefore Activistic(reggy) Lukewarm(reggy) and Activistic(reggy) and Lukewarm(reggy) and Activistic(reggy) -> Dendritic(reggy) -> therefore Dendritic(reggy) Activistic(reggy) and Dendritic(reggy) and forall x (Activistic(x) and Dendritic(x) -> Pungent(x)) -> therefore Pungent(reggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Dominique is postural. Zaneta is apart. Jefferey is registered. If Jefferey is postural then Jefferey is purplish. If Dominique is groundless then Dominique is apart. If someone is bellbottom and lobate then they are purplish. Quiet people are bellbottom. All postural, purplish people are registered. If Dominique is postural and Dominique is bellbottom then Dominique is lobate. Zaneta is not purplish.", "logic": "\nPostural(dominique)\nApart(zaneta)\nRegistered(jefferey)\nPostural(jefferey) -> Purplish(jefferey)\nGroundless(dominique) -> Apart(dominique)\nforall x (Bellbottom(x) and Lobate(x) -> Purplish(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) -> Bellbottom(x))\nforall x (Postural(x) and Purplish(x) -> Registered(x))\nPostural(dominique) and Bellbottom(dominique) -> Lobate(dominique)\n\nnot Purplish(zaneta)\n\nforall x (Bellbottom(x) and Lobate(x) -> Purplish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Sammy is valorous. Ebonee is operable. Ginni is rusty. If Ginni is valorous then Ginni is alimentary. If Sammy is synchronal then Sammy is operable. If someone is abloom and cyclical then they are alimentary. Quiet people are abloom. All valorous, alimentary people are rusty. If Sammy is valorous and Sammy is abloom then Sammy is cyclical. Ebonee is rusty.", "logic": "\nValorous(sammy)\nOperable(ebonee)\nRusty(ginni)\nValorous(ginni) -> Alimentary(ginni)\nSynchronal(sammy) -> Operable(sammy)\nforall x (Abloom(x) and Cyclical(x) -> Alimentary(x))\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> Abloom(x))\nforall x (Valorous(x) and Alimentary(x) -> Rusty(x))\nValorous(sammy) and Abloom(sammy) -> Cyclical(sammy)\n\nRusty(ebonee)\n\nforall x (Valorous(x) and Alimentary(x) -> Rusty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Aimee is medusoid. Jaquelyn is disrupted. Talyah is unreduced. If Talyah is medusoid then Talyah is unclaimed. If Aimee is alveolate then Aimee is disrupted. If someone is awestruck and ramous then they are unclaimed. Quiet people are awestruck. All medusoid, unclaimed people are unreduced. If Aimee is medusoid and Aimee is awestruck then Aimee is ramous. Aimee is not disrupted.", "logic": "\nMedusoid(aimee)\nDisrupted(jaquelyn)\nUnreduced(talyah)\nMedusoid(talyah) -> Unclaimed(talyah)\nAlveolate(aimee) -> Disrupted(aimee)\nforall x (Awestruck(x) and Ramous(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) -> Awestruck(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) and Unclaimed(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nMedusoid(aimee) and Awestruck(aimee) -> Ramous(aimee)\n\nnot Disrupted(aimee)\n\nAlveolate(aimee) -> Disrupted(aimee) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Wyatan is overloaded. Chrystal is cadaveric. Becki is dorsal. If Becki is overloaded then Becki is bovine. If Wyatan is inactive then Wyatan is cadaveric. If someone is grassroots and gummy then they are bovine. Quiet people are grassroots. All overloaded, bovine people are dorsal. If Wyatan is overloaded and Wyatan is grassroots then Wyatan is gummy. Becki is bovine.", "logic": "\nOverloaded(wyatan)\nCadaveric(chrystal)\nDorsal(becki)\nOverloaded(becki) -> Bovine(becki)\nInactive(wyatan) -> Cadaveric(wyatan)\nforall x (Grassroots(x) and Gummy(x) -> Bovine(x))\nforall x (Overloaded(x) -> Grassroots(x))\nforall x (Overloaded(x) and Bovine(x) -> Dorsal(x))\nOverloaded(wyatan) and Grassroots(wyatan) -> Gummy(wyatan)\n\nBovine(becki)\n\nOverloaded(becki) -> Bovine(becki) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Theada is syncarpous. Stephani is freehand. Viviana is shameful. If Viviana is syncarpous then Viviana is stitched. If Theada is glary then Theada is freehand. If someone is cotyloidal and undamaged then they are stitched. Quiet people are cotyloidal. All syncarpous, stitched people are shameful. If Theada is syncarpous and Theada is cotyloidal then Theada is undamaged. Viviana is not freehand.", "logic": "\nSyncarpous(theada)\nFreehand(stephani)\nShameful(viviana)\nSyncarpous(viviana) -> Stitched(viviana)\nGlary(theada) -> Freehand(theada)\nforall x (Cotyloidal(x) and Undamaged(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) -> Cotyloidal(x))\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) and Stitched(x) -> Shameful(x))\nSyncarpous(theada) and Cotyloidal(theada) -> Undamaged(theada)\n\nnot Freehand(viviana)\n\nnot Freehand(viviana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Royce is submerged. Rodolphe is alcoholic. Luanna is thorough. If Luanna is submerged then Luanna is unsalable. If Royce is potable then Royce is alcoholic. If someone is pessimum and unbranded then they are unsalable. Quiet people are pessimum. All submerged, unsalable people are thorough. If Royce is submerged and Royce is pessimum then Royce is unbranded. Rodolphe is unbranded.", "logic": "\nSubmerged(royce)\nAlcoholic(rodolphe)\nThorough(luanna)\nSubmerged(luanna) -> Unsalable(luanna)\nPotable(royce) -> Alcoholic(royce)\nforall x (Pessimum(x) and Unbranded(x) -> Unsalable(x))\nforall x (Submerged(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Submerged(x) and Unsalable(x) -> Thorough(x))\nSubmerged(royce) and Pessimum(royce) -> Unbranded(royce)\n\nUnbranded(rodolphe)\n\nUnbranded(rodolphe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Cele is detectable. Anallese is upscale. Jobey is weekly. If Jobey is detectable then Jobey is endodontic. If Cele is cobwebby then Cele is upscale. If someone is yonder and cinematic then they are endodontic. Quiet people are yonder. All detectable, endodontic people are weekly. If Cele is detectable and Cele is yonder then Cele is cinematic. Jobey is not cinematic.", "logic": "\nDetectable(cele)\nUpscale(anallese)\nWeekly(jobey)\nDetectable(jobey) -> Endodontic(jobey)\nCobwebby(cele) -> Upscale(cele)\nforall x (Yonder(x) and Cinematic(x) -> Endodontic(x))\nforall x (Detectable(x) -> Yonder(x))\nforall x (Detectable(x) and Endodontic(x) -> Weekly(x))\nDetectable(cele) and Yonder(cele) -> Cinematic(cele)\n\nnot Cinematic(jobey)\n\nnot Cinematic(jobey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "Gilberta is hexangular. Hailee is inutile. Mellisa is walking. If Mellisa is hexangular then Mellisa is tearful. If Gilberta is tantamount then Gilberta is inutile. If someone is manlike and attendant then they are tearful. Quiet people are manlike. All hexangular, tearful people are walking. If Gilberta is hexangular and Gilberta is manlike then Gilberta is attendant. Hailee is tantamount.", "logic": "\nHexangular(gilberta)\nInutile(hailee)\nWalking(mellisa)\nHexangular(mellisa) -> Tearful(mellisa)\nTantamount(gilberta) -> Inutile(gilberta)\nforall x (Manlike(x) and Attendant(x) -> Tearful(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) -> Manlike(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) and Tearful(x) -> Walking(x))\nHexangular(gilberta) and Manlike(gilberta) -> Attendant(gilberta)\n\nTantamount(hailee)\n\nTantamount(hailee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-186"} {"premises": "The andria is unwounded. The tiffany is not abaxial. The ailene does not visit the andria. If the andria is unwounded then the andria does not visit the tiffany. The ailene does not visit the andria.", "logic": "\nUnwounded(andria)\nnot Abaxial(tiffany)\nnot Focalise(ailene, andria)\nUnwounded(andria) -> not Focalise(andria, tiffany)\n\nnot Focalise(ailene, andria)\n\ntherefore not Focalise(ailene, andria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The joice is flexible. The gunvor is not bended. The kalila does not visit the joice. If the joice is flexible then the joice does not visit the gunvor. The joice is not flexible.", "logic": "\nFlexible(joice)\nnot Bended(gunvor)\nnot Criticise(kalila, joice)\nFlexible(joice) -> not Criticise(joice, gunvor)\n\nnot Flexible(joice)\n\ntherefore Flexible(joice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The issy is centesimal. The skipp is not cherubic. The sussi does not visit the issy. If the issy is centesimal then the issy does not visit the skipp. The issy does not visit the skipp.", "logic": "\nCentesimal(issy)\nnot Cherubic(skipp)\nnot Redact(sussi, issy)\nCentesimal(issy) -> not Redact(issy, skipp)\n\nnot Redact(issy, skipp)\n\nCentesimal(issy) and Centesimal(issy) -> not Redact(issy, skipp) -> therefore not Redact(issy, skipp)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The eadith is pernickety. The myna is not unfruitful. The genevieve does not visit the eadith. If the eadith is pernickety then the eadith does not visit the myna. The eadith tour the myna.", "logic": "\nPernickety(eadith)\nnot Unfruitful(myna)\nnot Tour(genevieve, eadith)\nPernickety(eadith) -> not Tour(eadith, myna)\n\nTour(eadith, myna)\n\nPernickety(eadith) and Pernickety(eadith) -> not Tour(eadith, myna) -> therefore not Tour(eadith, myna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The giffie is mohammedan. The channa is not tricky. The lilias does not visit the giffie. If the giffie is mohammedan then the giffie does not visit the channa. The channa does not chase the channa.", "logic": "\nMohammedan(giffie)\nnot Tricky(channa)\nnot Ptyalise(lilias, giffie)\nMohammedan(giffie) -> not Ptyalise(giffie, channa)\n\nnot Chases(channa, channa)\n\nnot Chases(channa, channa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The harmon is botulinal. The sabine is not swinish. The odette does not visit the harmon. If the harmon is botulinal then the harmon does not visit the sabine. The sabine is botulinal.", "logic": "\nBotulinal(harmon)\nnot Swinish(sabine)\nnot Praise(odette, harmon)\nBotulinal(harmon) -> not Praise(harmon, sabine)\n\nBotulinal(sabine)\n\nBotulinal(sabine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The roxy is dandy. The lucita is not lebanese. The welbie does not visit the roxy. If the roxy is dandy then the roxy does not visit the lucita. The roxy is not lebanese.", "logic": "\nDandy(roxy)\nnot Lebanese(lucita)\nnot Chaperon(welbie, roxy)\nDandy(roxy) -> not Chaperon(roxy, lucita)\n\nnot Lebanese(roxy)\n\nnot Lebanese(roxy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The joela is bowelless. The renado is not restful. The mahmud does not visit the joela. If the joela is bowelless then the joela does not visit the renado. The renado chases the joela.", "logic": "\nBowelless(joela)\nnot Restful(renado)\nnot Sour(mahmud, joela)\nBowelless(joela) -> not Sour(joela, renado)\n\nChases(renado, joela)\n\nChases(renado, joela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1061"} {"premises": "The olwen unsheathe the lorianna. The gilligan unsheathe the olwen. The lorianna unsheathe the olwen. If someone unsheathe the olwen and they eat the gilligan then they like the lorianna. If someone rasterize the gilligan then the gilligan unsheathe the lorianna. If someone is egoistic then they chase the lorianna. If someone unsheathe the olwen then they like the lorianna. If someone rasterize the olwen and they are plumb then the olwen ruggedize the gilligan. If someone ruggedize the olwen then they are egoistic. The gilligan unsheathe the olwen.", "logic": "\nUnsheathe(olwen, lorianna)\nUnsheathe(gilligan, olwen)\nUnsheathe(lorianna, olwen)\nforall x (Unsheathe(x, olwen) and Unsheathe(x, gilligan) -> Ruggedize(x, lorianna))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, gilligan) -> Unsheathe(gilligan, lorianna))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Rasterize(x, lorianna))\nforall x (Unsheathe(x, olwen) -> Ruggedize(x, lorianna))\nforall x (Rasterize(x, olwen) and Plumb(x) -> Ruggedize(olwen, gilligan))\nforall x (Ruggedize(x, olwen) -> Egoistic(x))\n\nUnsheathe(gilligan, olwen)\n\ntherefore Unsheathe(gilligan, olwen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "The eleonore sensify the rudie. The randene sensify the eleonore. The rudie sensify the eleonore. If someone sensify the eleonore and they eat the randene then they like the rudie. If someone madrigal the randene then the randene sensify the rudie. If someone is moraceous then they chase the rudie. If someone sensify the eleonore then they like the rudie. If someone madrigal the eleonore and they are unaffected then the eleonore finagle the randene. If someone finagle the eleonore then they are moraceous. The eleonore does not eat the rudie.", "logic": "\nSensify(eleonore, rudie)\nSensify(randene, eleonore)\nSensify(rudie, eleonore)\nforall x (Sensify(x, eleonore) and Sensify(x, randene) -> Finagle(x, rudie))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, randene) -> Sensify(randene, rudie))\nforall x (Moraceous(x) -> Madrigal(x, rudie))\nforall x (Sensify(x, eleonore) -> Finagle(x, rudie))\nforall x (Madrigal(x, eleonore) and Unaffected(x) -> Finagle(eleonore, randene))\nforall x (Finagle(x, eleonore) -> Moraceous(x))\n\nnot Sensify(eleonore, rudie)\n\ntherefore Sensify(eleonore, rudie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "The nadya autotomise the alvin. The morgan autotomise the nadya. The alvin autotomise the nadya. If someone autotomise the nadya and they eat the morgan then they like the alvin. If someone reignite the morgan then the morgan autotomise the alvin. If someone is shadowy then they chase the alvin. If someone autotomise the nadya then they like the alvin. If someone reignite the nadya and they are slaphappy then the nadya moderate the morgan. If someone moderate the nadya then they are shadowy. The alvin moderate the alvin.", "logic": "\nAutotomise(nadya, alvin)\nAutotomise(morgan, nadya)\nAutotomise(alvin, nadya)\nforall x (Autotomise(x, nadya) and Autotomise(x, morgan) -> Moderate(x, alvin))\nforall x (Reignite(x, morgan) -> Autotomise(morgan, alvin))\nforall x (Shadowy(x) -> Reignite(x, alvin))\nforall x (Autotomise(x, nadya) -> Moderate(x, alvin))\nforall x (Reignite(x, nadya) and Slaphappy(x) -> Moderate(nadya, morgan))\nforall x (Moderate(x, nadya) -> Shadowy(x))\n\nModerate(alvin, alvin)\n\nAutotomise(alvin, nadya) and forall x (Autotomise(x, nadya) -> Moderate(x, alvin)) -> therefore Moderate(alvin, alvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "The lori confide the melinda. The garvey confide the lori. The melinda confide the lori. If someone confide the lori and they eat the garvey then they like the melinda. If someone assess the garvey then the garvey confide the melinda. If someone is obese then they chase the melinda. If someone confide the lori then they like the melinda. If someone assess the lori and they are guarded then the lori chin the garvey. If someone chin the lori then they are obese. The melinda does not like the melinda.", "logic": "\nConfide(lori, melinda)\nConfide(garvey, lori)\nConfide(melinda, lori)\nforall x (Confide(x, lori) and Confide(x, garvey) -> Chin(x, melinda))\nforall x (Assess(x, garvey) -> Confide(garvey, melinda))\nforall x (Obese(x) -> Assess(x, melinda))\nforall x (Confide(x, lori) -> Chin(x, melinda))\nforall x (Assess(x, lori) and Guarded(x) -> Chin(lori, garvey))\nforall x (Chin(x, lori) -> Obese(x))\n\nnot Chin(melinda, melinda)\n\nConfide(melinda, lori) and forall x (Confide(x, lori) -> Chin(x, melinda)) -> therefore Chin(melinda, melinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "The dion mishandle the elwood. The alley mishandle the dion. The elwood mishandle the dion. If someone mishandle the dion and they eat the alley then they like the elwood. If someone introvert the alley then the alley mishandle the elwood. If someone is hyaloid then they chase the elwood. If someone mishandle the dion then they like the elwood. If someone introvert the dion and they are sounding then the dion immingle the alley. If someone immingle the dion then they are hyaloid. The elwood does not chase the elwood.", "logic": "\nMishandle(dion, elwood)\nMishandle(alley, dion)\nMishandle(elwood, dion)\nforall x (Mishandle(x, dion) and Mishandle(x, alley) -> Immingle(x, elwood))\nforall x (Introvert(x, alley) -> Mishandle(alley, elwood))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Introvert(x, elwood))\nforall x (Mishandle(x, dion) -> Immingle(x, elwood))\nforall x (Introvert(x, dion) and Sounding(x) -> Immingle(dion, alley))\nforall x (Immingle(x, dion) -> Hyaloid(x))\n\nnot Introvert(elwood, elwood)\n\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Introvert(x, elwood)) <- forall x (Immingle(x, dion) -> Hyaloid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "The sanders enunciate the tami. The avril enunciate the sanders. The tami enunciate the sanders. If someone enunciate the sanders and they eat the avril then they like the tami. If someone disorder the avril then the avril enunciate the tami. If someone is greyish then they chase the tami. If someone enunciate the sanders then they like the tami. If someone disorder the sanders and they are perennial then the sanders manacle the avril. If someone manacle the sanders then they are greyish. The avril is greyish.", "logic": "\nEnunciate(sanders, tami)\nEnunciate(avril, sanders)\nEnunciate(tami, sanders)\nforall x (Enunciate(x, sanders) and Enunciate(x, avril) -> Manacle(x, tami))\nforall x (Disorder(x, avril) -> Enunciate(avril, tami))\nforall x (Greyish(x) -> Disorder(x, tami))\nforall x (Enunciate(x, sanders) -> Manacle(x, tami))\nforall x (Disorder(x, sanders) and Perennial(x) -> Manacle(sanders, avril))\nforall x (Manacle(x, sanders) -> Greyish(x))\n\nGreyish(avril)\n\nforall x (Manacle(x, sanders) -> Greyish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "The fern racketeer the paul. The olwen racketeer the fern. The paul racketeer the fern. If someone racketeer the fern and they eat the olwen then they like the paul. If someone watercolor the olwen then the olwen racketeer the paul. If someone is shopworn then they chase the paul. If someone racketeer the fern then they like the paul. If someone watercolor the fern and they are permeative then the fern view the olwen. If someone view the fern then they are shopworn. The paul does not chase the olwen.", "logic": "\nRacketeer(fern, paul)\nRacketeer(olwen, fern)\nRacketeer(paul, fern)\nforall x (Racketeer(x, fern) and Racketeer(x, olwen) -> View(x, paul))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, olwen) -> Racketeer(olwen, paul))\nforall x (Shopworn(x) -> Watercolor(x, paul))\nforall x (Racketeer(x, fern) -> View(x, paul))\nforall x (Watercolor(x, fern) and Permeative(x) -> View(fern, olwen))\nforall x (View(x, fern) -> Shopworn(x))\n\nnot Watercolor(paul, olwen)\n\nnot Watercolor(paul, olwen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "The schuyler potter the britta. The amalita potter the schuyler. The britta potter the schuyler. If someone potter the schuyler and they eat the amalita then they like the britta. If someone narcotise the amalita then the amalita potter the britta. If someone is austral then they chase the britta. If someone potter the schuyler then they like the britta. If someone narcotise the schuyler and they are comparable then the schuyler prance the amalita. If someone prance the schuyler then they are austral. The britta narcotise the schuyler.", "logic": "\nPotter(schuyler, britta)\nPotter(amalita, schuyler)\nPotter(britta, schuyler)\nforall x (Potter(x, schuyler) and Potter(x, amalita) -> Prance(x, britta))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, amalita) -> Potter(amalita, britta))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Narcotise(x, britta))\nforall x (Potter(x, schuyler) -> Prance(x, britta))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, schuyler) and Comparable(x) -> Prance(schuyler, amalita))\nforall x (Prance(x, schuyler) -> Austral(x))\n\nNarcotise(britta, schuyler)\n\nNarcotise(britta, schuyler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-153"} {"premises": "Arda is indusial. Arda is overcast. Arda is not audenesque. Jerrylee is not audenesque. Jerrylee is primeval. Amalie is unplaced. Amalie is overcast. Carson is abject. Carson is audenesque. Carson is not primeval. If someone is overcast and unplaced then they are primeval. If Jerrylee is unplaced then Jerrylee is abject. White people are abject. If Carson is not overcast then Carson is abject. All overcast, abject people are bratty. If someone is indusial and not primeval then they are not bratty. Arda is indusial.", "logic": "\nIndusial(arda)\nOvercast(arda)\nnot Audenesque(arda)\nnot Audenesque(jerrylee)\nPrimeval(jerrylee)\nUnplaced(amalie)\nOvercast(amalie)\nAbject(carson)\nAudenesque(carson)\nnot Primeval(carson)\nforall x (Overcast(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Primeval(x))\nUnplaced(jerrylee) -> Abject(jerrylee)\nforall x (Primeval(x) -> Abject(x))\nnot Overcast(carson) -> Abject(carson)\nforall x (Overcast(x) and Abject(x) -> Bratty(x))\nforall x (Indusial(x) and not Primeval(x) -> not Bratty(x))\n\nIndusial(arda)\n\ntherefore Indusial(arda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Heda is maximum. Heda is thrifty. Heda is not breathed. Mollee is not breathed. Mollee is outre. Justine is paroicous. Justine is thrifty. Ellen is isochronal. Ellen is breathed. Ellen is not outre. If someone is thrifty and paroicous then they are outre. If Mollee is paroicous then Mollee is isochronal. White people are isochronal. If Ellen is not thrifty then Ellen is isochronal. All thrifty, isochronal people are larval. If someone is maximum and not outre then they are not larval. Mollee is not outre.", "logic": "\nMaximum(heda)\nThrifty(heda)\nnot Breathed(heda)\nnot Breathed(mollee)\nOutre(mollee)\nParoicous(justine)\nThrifty(justine)\nIsochronal(ellen)\nBreathed(ellen)\nnot Outre(ellen)\nforall x (Thrifty(x) and Paroicous(x) -> Outre(x))\nParoicous(mollee) -> Isochronal(mollee)\nforall x (Outre(x) -> Isochronal(x))\nnot Thrifty(ellen) -> Isochronal(ellen)\nforall x (Thrifty(x) and Isochronal(x) -> Larval(x))\nforall x (Maximum(x) and not Outre(x) -> not Larval(x))\n\nnot Outre(mollee)\n\ntherefore Outre(mollee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Caro is undepicted. Caro is craggy. Caro is not fragmented. Ursuline is not fragmented. Ursuline is sozzled. Trixy is unpictured. Trixy is craggy. Barnett is festal. Barnett is fragmented. Barnett is not sozzled. If someone is craggy and unpictured then they are sozzled. If Ursuline is unpictured then Ursuline is festal. White people are festal. If Barnett is not craggy then Barnett is festal. All craggy, festal people are verbatim. If someone is undepicted and not sozzled then they are not verbatim. Trixy is sozzled.", "logic": "\nUndepicted(caro)\nCraggy(caro)\nnot Fragmented(caro)\nnot Fragmented(ursuline)\nSozzled(ursuline)\nUnpictured(trixy)\nCraggy(trixy)\nFestal(barnett)\nFragmented(barnett)\nnot Sozzled(barnett)\nforall x (Craggy(x) and Unpictured(x) -> Sozzled(x))\nUnpictured(ursuline) -> Festal(ursuline)\nforall x (Sozzled(x) -> Festal(x))\nnot Craggy(barnett) -> Festal(barnett)\nforall x (Craggy(x) and Festal(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Undepicted(x) and not Sozzled(x) -> not Verbatim(x))\n\nSozzled(trixy)\n\nCraggy(trixy) and Unpictured(trixy) and forall x (Craggy(x) and Unpictured(x) -> Sozzled(x)) -> therefore Sozzled(trixy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Renel is mammary. Renel is ambulatory. Renel is not ambrosial. Cally is not ambrosial. Cally is derived. Hamlen is bunchy. Hamlen is ambulatory. Dylan is grovelling. Dylan is ambrosial. Dylan is not derived. If someone is ambulatory and bunchy then they are derived. If Cally is bunchy then Cally is grovelling. White people are grovelling. If Dylan is not ambulatory then Dylan is grovelling. All ambulatory, grovelling people are ceruminous. If someone is mammary and not derived then they are not ceruminous. Hamlen is not derived.", "logic": "\nMammary(renel)\nAmbulatory(renel)\nnot Ambrosial(renel)\nnot Ambrosial(cally)\nDerived(cally)\nBunchy(hamlen)\nAmbulatory(hamlen)\nGrovelling(dylan)\nAmbrosial(dylan)\nnot Derived(dylan)\nforall x (Ambulatory(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Derived(x))\nBunchy(cally) -> Grovelling(cally)\nforall x (Derived(x) -> Grovelling(x))\nnot Ambulatory(dylan) -> Grovelling(dylan)\nforall x (Ambulatory(x) and Grovelling(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) and not Derived(x) -> not Ceruminous(x))\n\nnot Derived(hamlen)\n\nAmbulatory(hamlen) and Bunchy(hamlen) and forall x (Ambulatory(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Derived(x)) -> therefore Derived(hamlen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Cate is situated. Cate is indisposed. Cate is not faultless. Carlynn is not faultless. Carlynn is privileged. Carie is noted. Carie is indisposed. Rahul is slangy. Rahul is faultless. Rahul is not privileged. If someone is indisposed and noted then they are privileged. If Carlynn is noted then Carlynn is slangy. White people are slangy. If Rahul is not indisposed then Rahul is slangy. All indisposed, slangy people are mutant. If someone is situated and not privileged then they are not mutant. Carie is slangy.", "logic": "\nSituated(cate)\nIndisposed(cate)\nnot Faultless(cate)\nnot Faultless(carlynn)\nPrivileged(carlynn)\nNoted(carie)\nIndisposed(carie)\nSlangy(rahul)\nFaultless(rahul)\nnot Privileged(rahul)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and Noted(x) -> Privileged(x))\nNoted(carlynn) -> Slangy(carlynn)\nforall x (Privileged(x) -> Slangy(x))\nnot Indisposed(rahul) -> Slangy(rahul)\nforall x (Indisposed(x) and Slangy(x) -> Mutant(x))\nforall x (Situated(x) and not Privileged(x) -> not Mutant(x))\n\nSlangy(carie)\n\nIndisposed(carie) and Noted(carie) and forall x (Indisposed(x) and Noted(x) -> Privileged(x)) -> therefore Privileged(carie) Privileged(carie) and forall x (Privileged(x) -> Slangy(x)) -> therefore Slangy(carie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Easter is oriental. Easter is extendable. Easter is not spidery. Nil is not spidery. Nil is rwandan. Roderic is warm. Roderic is extendable. Elene is grapelike. Elene is spidery. Elene is not rwandan. If someone is extendable and warm then they are rwandan. If Nil is warm then Nil is grapelike. White people are grapelike. If Elene is not extendable then Elene is grapelike. All extendable, grapelike people are exploited. If someone is oriental and not rwandan then they are not exploited. Roderic is not grapelike.", "logic": "\nOriental(easter)\nExtendable(easter)\nnot Spidery(easter)\nnot Spidery(nil)\nRwandan(nil)\nWarm(roderic)\nExtendable(roderic)\nGrapelike(elene)\nSpidery(elene)\nnot Rwandan(elene)\nforall x (Extendable(x) and Warm(x) -> Rwandan(x))\nWarm(nil) -> Grapelike(nil)\nforall x (Rwandan(x) -> Grapelike(x))\nnot Extendable(elene) -> Grapelike(elene)\nforall x (Extendable(x) and Grapelike(x) -> Exploited(x))\nforall x (Oriental(x) and not Rwandan(x) -> not Exploited(x))\n\nnot Grapelike(roderic)\n\nExtendable(roderic) and Warm(roderic) and forall x (Extendable(x) and Warm(x) -> Rwandan(x)) -> therefore Rwandan(roderic) Rwandan(roderic) and forall x (Rwandan(x) -> Grapelike(x)) -> therefore Grapelike(roderic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Churchill is quits. Churchill is neoplastic. Churchill is not helminthic. Myna is not helminthic. Myna is imprudent. Binny is irritating. Binny is neoplastic. Shira is overfull. Shira is helminthic. Shira is not imprudent. If someone is neoplastic and irritating then they are imprudent. If Myna is irritating then Myna is overfull. White people are overfull. If Shira is not neoplastic then Shira is overfull. All neoplastic, overfull people are optical. If someone is quits and not imprudent then they are not optical. Binny is optical.", "logic": "\nQuits(churchill)\nNeoplastic(churchill)\nnot Helminthic(churchill)\nnot Helminthic(myna)\nImprudent(myna)\nIrritating(binny)\nNeoplastic(binny)\nOverfull(shira)\nHelminthic(shira)\nnot Imprudent(shira)\nforall x (Neoplastic(x) and Irritating(x) -> Imprudent(x))\nIrritating(myna) -> Overfull(myna)\nforall x (Imprudent(x) -> Overfull(x))\nnot Neoplastic(shira) -> Overfull(shira)\nforall x (Neoplastic(x) and Overfull(x) -> Optical(x))\nforall x (Quits(x) and not Imprudent(x) -> not Optical(x))\n\nOptical(binny)\n\nNeoplastic(binny) and Irritating(binny) and forall x (Neoplastic(x) and Irritating(x) -> Imprudent(x)) -> therefore Imprudent(binny) Imprudent(binny) and forall x (Imprudent(x) -> Overfull(x)) -> therefore Overfull(binny) Neoplastic(binny) and Overfull(binny) and forall x (Neoplastic(x) and Overfull(x) -> Optical(x)) -> therefore Optical(binny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Wayne is zesty. Wayne is nosy. Wayne is not maudlin. Dix is not maudlin. Dix is koranic. Charlton is taped. Charlton is nosy. Shela is lubberly. Shela is maudlin. Shela is not koranic. If someone is nosy and taped then they are koranic. If Dix is taped then Dix is lubberly. White people are lubberly. If Shela is not nosy then Shela is lubberly. All nosy, lubberly people are starchlike. If someone is zesty and not koranic then they are not starchlike. Charlton is not starchlike.", "logic": "\nZesty(wayne)\nNosy(wayne)\nnot Maudlin(wayne)\nnot Maudlin(dix)\nKoranic(dix)\nTaped(charlton)\nNosy(charlton)\nLubberly(shela)\nMaudlin(shela)\nnot Koranic(shela)\nforall x (Nosy(x) and Taped(x) -> Koranic(x))\nTaped(dix) -> Lubberly(dix)\nforall x (Koranic(x) -> Lubberly(x))\nnot Nosy(shela) -> Lubberly(shela)\nforall x (Nosy(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Starchlike(x))\nforall x (Zesty(x) and not Koranic(x) -> not Starchlike(x))\n\nnot Starchlike(charlton)\n\nNosy(charlton) and Taped(charlton) and forall x (Nosy(x) and Taped(x) -> Koranic(x)) -> therefore Koranic(charlton) Koranic(charlton) and forall x (Koranic(x) -> Lubberly(x)) -> therefore Lubberly(charlton) Nosy(charlton) and Lubberly(charlton) and forall x (Nosy(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Starchlike(x)) -> therefore Starchlike(charlton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Arianne is stringent. Arianne is plutonian. Arianne is not authorised. Trudy is not authorised. Trudy is pupal. Elysee is ophthalmic. Elysee is plutonian. Haleigh is nonpareil. Haleigh is authorised. Haleigh is not pupal. If someone is plutonian and ophthalmic then they are pupal. If Trudy is ophthalmic then Trudy is nonpareil. White people are nonpareil. If Haleigh is not plutonian then Haleigh is nonpareil. All plutonian, nonpareil people are propulsive. If someone is stringent and not pupal then they are not propulsive. Arianne is not pupal.", "logic": "\nStringent(arianne)\nPlutonian(arianne)\nnot Authorised(arianne)\nnot Authorised(trudy)\nPupal(trudy)\nOphthalmic(elysee)\nPlutonian(elysee)\nNonpareil(haleigh)\nAuthorised(haleigh)\nnot Pupal(haleigh)\nforall x (Plutonian(x) and Ophthalmic(x) -> Pupal(x))\nOphthalmic(trudy) -> Nonpareil(trudy)\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Nonpareil(x))\nnot Plutonian(haleigh) -> Nonpareil(haleigh)\nforall x (Plutonian(x) and Nonpareil(x) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Stringent(x) and not Pupal(x) -> not Propulsive(x))\n\nnot Pupal(arianne)\n\nforall x (Plutonian(x) and Ophthalmic(x) -> Pupal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Deborah is baroque. Deborah is mustached. Deborah is not absurd. Phaedra is not absurd. Phaedra is pugnacious. Jilli is armed. Jilli is mustached. Kimberley is responsive. Kimberley is absurd. Kimberley is not pugnacious. If someone is mustached and armed then they are pugnacious. If Phaedra is armed then Phaedra is responsive. White people are responsive. If Kimberley is not mustached then Kimberley is responsive. All mustached, responsive people are marketable. If someone is baroque and not pugnacious then they are not marketable. Phaedra is marketable.", "logic": "\nBaroque(deborah)\nMustached(deborah)\nnot Absurd(deborah)\nnot Absurd(phaedra)\nPugnacious(phaedra)\nArmed(jilli)\nMustached(jilli)\nResponsive(kimberley)\nAbsurd(kimberley)\nnot Pugnacious(kimberley)\nforall x (Mustached(x) and Armed(x) -> Pugnacious(x))\nArmed(phaedra) -> Responsive(phaedra)\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) -> Responsive(x))\nnot Mustached(kimberley) -> Responsive(kimberley)\nforall x (Mustached(x) and Responsive(x) -> Marketable(x))\nforall x (Baroque(x) and not Pugnacious(x) -> not Marketable(x))\n\nMarketable(phaedra)\n\nforall x (Mustached(x) and Responsive(x) -> Marketable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Jania is made. Jania is dazzling. Jania is not bareheaded. Wilfrid is not bareheaded. Wilfrid is avid. Sharie is devalued. Sharie is dazzling. Wendel is miniscule. Wendel is bareheaded. Wendel is not avid. If someone is dazzling and devalued then they are avid. If Wilfrid is devalued then Wilfrid is miniscule. White people are miniscule. If Wendel is not dazzling then Wendel is miniscule. All dazzling, miniscule people are brimful. If someone is made and not avid then they are not brimful. Jania is not miniscule.", "logic": "\nMade(jania)\nDazzling(jania)\nnot Bareheaded(jania)\nnot Bareheaded(wilfrid)\nAvid(wilfrid)\nDevalued(sharie)\nDazzling(sharie)\nMiniscule(wendel)\nBareheaded(wendel)\nnot Avid(wendel)\nforall x (Dazzling(x) and Devalued(x) -> Avid(x))\nDevalued(wilfrid) -> Miniscule(wilfrid)\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Miniscule(x))\nnot Dazzling(wendel) -> Miniscule(wendel)\nforall x (Dazzling(x) and Miniscule(x) -> Brimful(x))\nforall x (Made(x) and not Avid(x) -> not Brimful(x))\n\nnot Miniscule(jania)\n\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Miniscule(x)) <- forall x (Dazzling(x) and Devalued(x) -> Avid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Grayce is calloused. Grayce is resentful. Grayce is not theban. Alana is not theban. Alana is nonliteral. Jodie is lowly. Jodie is resentful. Karel is ironical. Karel is theban. Karel is not nonliteral. If someone is resentful and lowly then they are nonliteral. If Alana is lowly then Alana is ironical. White people are ironical. If Karel is not resentful then Karel is ironical. All resentful, ironical people are mangy. If someone is calloused and not nonliteral then they are not mangy. Grayce is mangy.", "logic": "\nCalloused(grayce)\nResentful(grayce)\nnot Theban(grayce)\nnot Theban(alana)\nNonliteral(alana)\nLowly(jodie)\nResentful(jodie)\nIronical(karel)\nTheban(karel)\nnot Nonliteral(karel)\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Lowly(x) -> Nonliteral(x))\nLowly(alana) -> Ironical(alana)\nforall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Ironical(x))\nnot Resentful(karel) -> Ironical(karel)\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Ironical(x) -> Mangy(x))\nforall x (Calloused(x) and not Nonliteral(x) -> not Mangy(x))\n\nMangy(grayce)\n\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Ironical(x) -> Mangy(x)) <- forall x (Nonliteral(x) -> Ironical(x)) <- forall x (Resentful(x) and Lowly(x) -> Nonliteral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Forrester is angelical. Forrester is ascetic. Forrester is not antiviral. Kirby is not antiviral. Kirby is vestal. Shurlocke is perceptive. Shurlocke is ascetic. Fredelia is stretchy. Fredelia is antiviral. Fredelia is not vestal. If someone is ascetic and perceptive then they are vestal. If Kirby is perceptive then Kirby is stretchy. White people are stretchy. If Fredelia is not ascetic then Fredelia is stretchy. All ascetic, stretchy people are advective. If someone is angelical and not vestal then they are not advective. Kirby is not perceptive.", "logic": "\nAngelical(forrester)\nAscetic(forrester)\nnot Antiviral(forrester)\nnot Antiviral(kirby)\nVestal(kirby)\nPerceptive(shurlocke)\nAscetic(shurlocke)\nStretchy(fredelia)\nAntiviral(fredelia)\nnot Vestal(fredelia)\nforall x (Ascetic(x) and Perceptive(x) -> Vestal(x))\nPerceptive(kirby) -> Stretchy(kirby)\nforall x (Vestal(x) -> Stretchy(x))\nnot Ascetic(fredelia) -> Stretchy(fredelia)\nforall x (Ascetic(x) and Stretchy(x) -> Advective(x))\nforall x (Angelical(x) and not Vestal(x) -> not Advective(x))\n\nnot Perceptive(kirby)\n\nnot Perceptive(kirby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Francisca is strange. Francisca is diplomatic. Francisca is not billowy. Cameron is not billowy. Cameron is versatile. Annalee is changeless. Annalee is diplomatic. Lynna is sodding. Lynna is billowy. Lynna is not versatile. If someone is diplomatic and changeless then they are versatile. If Cameron is changeless then Cameron is sodding. White people are sodding. If Lynna is not diplomatic then Lynna is sodding. All diplomatic, sodding people are antiknock. If someone is strange and not versatile then they are not antiknock. Annalee is billowy.", "logic": "\nStrange(francisca)\nDiplomatic(francisca)\nnot Billowy(francisca)\nnot Billowy(cameron)\nVersatile(cameron)\nChangeless(annalee)\nDiplomatic(annalee)\nSodding(lynna)\nBillowy(lynna)\nnot Versatile(lynna)\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) and Changeless(x) -> Versatile(x))\nChangeless(cameron) -> Sodding(cameron)\nforall x (Versatile(x) -> Sodding(x))\nnot Diplomatic(lynna) -> Sodding(lynna)\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) and Sodding(x) -> Antiknock(x))\nforall x (Strange(x) and not Versatile(x) -> not Antiknock(x))\n\nBillowy(annalee)\n\nBillowy(annalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Flore is idyllic. Flore is sinhalese. Flore is not dummy. Dolora is not dummy. Dolora is idealised. Wolfie is complex. Wolfie is sinhalese. Annamaria is autoecious. Annamaria is dummy. Annamaria is not idealised. If someone is sinhalese and complex then they are idealised. If Dolora is complex then Dolora is autoecious. White people are autoecious. If Annamaria is not sinhalese then Annamaria is autoecious. All sinhalese, autoecious people are fledgeless. If someone is idyllic and not idealised then they are not fledgeless. Annamaria is not idyllic.", "logic": "\nIdyllic(flore)\nSinhalese(flore)\nnot Dummy(flore)\nnot Dummy(dolora)\nIdealised(dolora)\nComplex(wolfie)\nSinhalese(wolfie)\nAutoecious(annamaria)\nDummy(annamaria)\nnot Idealised(annamaria)\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Complex(x) -> Idealised(x))\nComplex(dolora) -> Autoecious(dolora)\nforall x (Idealised(x) -> Autoecious(x))\nnot Sinhalese(annamaria) -> Autoecious(annamaria)\nforall x (Sinhalese(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Fledgeless(x))\nforall x (Idyllic(x) and not Idealised(x) -> not Fledgeless(x))\n\nnot Idyllic(annamaria)\n\nnot Idyllic(annamaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "Zondra is fringed. Zondra is diverging. Zondra is not fetal. Frederico is not fetal. Frederico is calorific. Jacenta is overmodest. Jacenta is diverging. Cicely is twilit. Cicely is fetal. Cicely is not calorific. If someone is diverging and overmodest then they are calorific. If Frederico is overmodest then Frederico is twilit. White people are twilit. If Cicely is not diverging then Cicely is twilit. All diverging, twilit people are rangy. If someone is fringed and not calorific then they are not rangy. Cicely is diverging.", "logic": "\nFringed(zondra)\nDiverging(zondra)\nnot Fetal(zondra)\nnot Fetal(frederico)\nCalorific(frederico)\nOvermodest(jacenta)\nDiverging(jacenta)\nTwilit(cicely)\nFetal(cicely)\nnot Calorific(cicely)\nforall x (Diverging(x) and Overmodest(x) -> Calorific(x))\nOvermodest(frederico) -> Twilit(frederico)\nforall x (Calorific(x) -> Twilit(x))\nnot Diverging(cicely) -> Twilit(cicely)\nforall x (Diverging(x) and Twilit(x) -> Rangy(x))\nforall x (Fringed(x) and not Calorific(x) -> not Rangy(x))\n\nDiverging(cicely)\n\nDiverging(cicely) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-833"} {"premises": "The hulda is grownup. Blue things are humanlike. All grownup things are disordered. If something is humanlike then it is palmate. The hulda is grownup.", "logic": "\nGrownup(hulda)\nforall x (Disordered(x) -> Humanlike(x))\nforall x (Grownup(x) -> Disordered(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) -> Palmate(x))\n\nGrownup(hulda)\n\ntherefore Grownup(hulda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The theodoric is prepupal. Blue things are genotypic. All prepupal things are appositive. If something is genotypic then it is xxxvi. The theodoric is not prepupal.", "logic": "\nPrepupal(theodoric)\nforall x (Appositive(x) -> Genotypic(x))\nforall x (Prepupal(x) -> Appositive(x))\nforall x (Genotypic(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\n\nnot Prepupal(theodoric)\n\ntherefore Prepupal(theodoric)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The marmaduke is digressive. Blue things are fagged. All digressive things are sickening. If something is fagged then it is agnate. The marmaduke is sickening.", "logic": "\nDigressive(marmaduke)\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Fagged(x))\nforall x (Digressive(x) -> Sickening(x))\nforall x (Fagged(x) -> Agnate(x))\n\nSickening(marmaduke)\n\nDigressive(marmaduke) and forall x (Digressive(x) -> Sickening(x)) -> therefore Sickening(marmaduke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The antonio is bothersome. Blue things are aligned. All bothersome things are amygdaloid. If something is aligned then it is cleavable. The antonio is not amygdaloid.", "logic": "\nBothersome(antonio)\nforall x (Amygdaloid(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\nforall x (Aligned(x) -> Cleavable(x))\n\nnot Amygdaloid(antonio)\n\nBothersome(antonio) and forall x (Bothersome(x) -> Amygdaloid(x)) -> therefore Amygdaloid(antonio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The astra is swish. Blue things are noticed. All swish things are diplomatic. If something is noticed then it is seven. The astra is noticed.", "logic": "\nSwish(astra)\nforall x (Diplomatic(x) -> Noticed(x))\nforall x (Swish(x) -> Diplomatic(x))\nforall x (Noticed(x) -> Seven(x))\n\nNoticed(astra)\n\nSwish(astra) and forall x (Swish(x) -> Diplomatic(x)) -> therefore Diplomatic(astra) Diplomatic(astra) and forall x (Diplomatic(x) -> Noticed(x)) -> therefore Noticed(astra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The gerta is dogged. Blue things are unshod. All dogged things are muddled. If something is unshod then it is acinous. The gerta is not unshod.", "logic": "\nDogged(gerta)\nforall x (Muddled(x) -> Unshod(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Unshod(x) -> Acinous(x))\n\nnot Unshod(gerta)\n\nDogged(gerta) and forall x (Dogged(x) -> Muddled(x)) -> therefore Muddled(gerta) Muddled(gerta) and forall x (Muddled(x) -> Unshod(x)) -> therefore Unshod(gerta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The crawford is fain. Blue things are uninominal. All fain things are fanged. If something is uninominal then it is cervine. The crawford is cervine.", "logic": "\nFain(crawford)\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Uninominal(x))\nforall x (Fain(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Uninominal(x) -> Cervine(x))\n\nCervine(crawford)\n\nFain(crawford) and forall x (Fain(x) -> Fanged(x)) -> therefore Fanged(crawford) Fanged(crawford) and forall x (Fanged(x) -> Uninominal(x)) -> therefore Uninominal(crawford) Uninominal(crawford) and forall x (Uninominal(x) -> Cervine(x)) -> therefore Cervine(crawford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The norris is trepid. Blue things are olden. All trepid things are portrayed. If something is olden then it is ready. The norris is not ready.", "logic": "\nTrepid(norris)\nforall x (Portrayed(x) -> Olden(x))\nforall x (Trepid(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Olden(x) -> Ready(x))\n\nnot Ready(norris)\n\nTrepid(norris) and forall x (Trepid(x) -> Portrayed(x)) -> therefore Portrayed(norris) Portrayed(norris) and forall x (Portrayed(x) -> Olden(x)) -> therefore Olden(norris) Olden(norris) and forall x (Olden(x) -> Ready(x)) -> therefore Ready(norris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The french is otic. Blue things are mucous. All otic things are ensuant. If something is mucous then it is rackety. The french is not green.", "logic": "\nOtic(french)\nforall x (Ensuant(x) -> Mucous(x))\nforall x (Otic(x) -> Ensuant(x))\nforall x (Mucous(x) -> Rackety(x))\n\nnot Green(french)\n\nnot Green(french) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The kandace is conjoint. Blue things are butcherly. All conjoint things are likely. If something is butcherly then it is immunised. The kandace eats the kandace.", "logic": "\nConjoint(kandace)\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Butcherly(x))\nforall x (Conjoint(x) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Butcherly(x) -> Immunised(x))\n\nEats(kandace, kandace)\n\nEats(kandace, kandace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The ollie is aecial. Blue things are mistreated. All aecial things are tangible. If something is mistreated then it is cross. The ollie does not see the ollie.", "logic": "\nAecial(ollie)\nforall x (Tangible(x) -> Mistreated(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Tangible(x))\nforall x (Mistreated(x) -> Cross(x))\n\nnot Sees(ollie, ollie)\n\nnot Sees(ollie, ollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "The abigail is utter. Blue things are surprising. All utter things are woozy. If something is surprising then it is echolike. The abigail needs the abigail.", "logic": "\nUtter(abigail)\nforall x (Woozy(x) -> Surprising(x))\nforall x (Utter(x) -> Woozy(x))\nforall x (Surprising(x) -> Echolike(x))\n\nNeeds(abigail, abigail)\n\nNeeds(abigail, abigail) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-743"} {"premises": "Kellsie is pacifist. Kellsie is malarial. Marinna is basinal. Marinna is undreamt. Marinna is malarial. Mavra is malarial. Kimberlee is palpitant. All undreamt people are xcvi. Red people are xcvi. Blue people are undreamt. Red, pacifist people are basinal. Blue, basinal people are pacifist. If someone is malarial then they are palpitant. If Mavra is palpitant and Mavra is pacifist then Mavra is malarial. Big people are malarial. Marinna is undreamt.", "logic": "\nPacifist(kellsie)\nMalarial(kellsie)\nBasinal(marinna)\nUndreamt(marinna)\nMalarial(marinna)\nMalarial(mavra)\nPalpitant(kimberlee)\nforall x (Undreamt(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Palpitant(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Undreamt(x))\nforall x (Palpitant(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) and Basinal(x) -> Pacifist(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nPalpitant(mavra) and Pacifist(mavra) -> Malarial(mavra)\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Malarial(x))\n\nUndreamt(marinna)\n\ntherefore Undreamt(marinna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Curt is bereaved. Curt is induced. Katlin is barbecued. Katlin is cardiac. Katlin is induced. Alvin is induced. Uli is abusive. All cardiac people are butch. Red people are butch. Blue people are cardiac. Red, bereaved people are barbecued. Blue, barbecued people are bereaved. If someone is induced then they are abusive. If Alvin is abusive and Alvin is bereaved then Alvin is induced. Big people are induced. Uli is not abusive.", "logic": "\nBereaved(curt)\nInduced(curt)\nBarbecued(katlin)\nCardiac(katlin)\nInduced(katlin)\nInduced(alvin)\nAbusive(uli)\nforall x (Cardiac(x) -> Butch(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) -> Butch(x))\nforall x (Butch(x) -> Cardiac(x))\nforall x (Abusive(x) and Bereaved(x) -> Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Butch(x) and Barbecued(x) -> Bereaved(x))\nforall x (Induced(x) -> Abusive(x))\nAbusive(alvin) and Bereaved(alvin) -> Induced(alvin)\nforall x (Barbecued(x) -> Induced(x))\n\nnot Abusive(uli)\n\ntherefore Abusive(uli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Paton is wooly. Paton is scriptural. Tomi is dwarfish. Tomi is theistic. Tomi is scriptural. Beverly is scriptural. Carly is uxorial. All theistic people are marginal. Red people are marginal. Blue people are theistic. Red, wooly people are dwarfish. Blue, dwarfish people are wooly. If someone is scriptural then they are uxorial. If Beverly is uxorial and Beverly is wooly then Beverly is scriptural. Big people are scriptural. Paton is uxorial.", "logic": "\nWooly(paton)\nScriptural(paton)\nDwarfish(tomi)\nTheistic(tomi)\nScriptural(tomi)\nScriptural(beverly)\nUxorial(carly)\nforall x (Theistic(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Uxorial(x) -> Marginal(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) -> Theistic(x))\nforall x (Uxorial(x) and Wooly(x) -> Dwarfish(x))\nforall x (Marginal(x) and Dwarfish(x) -> Wooly(x))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) -> Uxorial(x))\nUxorial(beverly) and Wooly(beverly) -> Scriptural(beverly)\nforall x (Dwarfish(x) -> Scriptural(x))\n\nUxorial(paton)\n\nScriptural(paton) and forall x (Scriptural(x) -> Uxorial(x)) -> therefore Uxorial(paton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Huntley is monied. Huntley is discerning. Shurwood is viable. Shurwood is springy. Shurwood is discerning. Livia is discerning. Thorndike is erythroid. All springy people are sphingine. Red people are sphingine. Blue people are springy. Red, monied people are viable. Blue, viable people are monied. If someone is discerning then they are erythroid. If Livia is erythroid and Livia is monied then Livia is discerning. Big people are discerning. Shurwood is not sphingine.", "logic": "\nMonied(huntley)\nDiscerning(huntley)\nViable(shurwood)\nSpringy(shurwood)\nDiscerning(shurwood)\nDiscerning(livia)\nErythroid(thorndike)\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Sphingine(x))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) -> Sphingine(x))\nforall x (Sphingine(x) -> Springy(x))\nforall x (Erythroid(x) and Monied(x) -> Viable(x))\nforall x (Sphingine(x) and Viable(x) -> Monied(x))\nforall x (Discerning(x) -> Erythroid(x))\nErythroid(livia) and Monied(livia) -> Discerning(livia)\nforall x (Viable(x) -> Discerning(x))\n\nnot Sphingine(shurwood)\n\nSpringy(shurwood) and forall x (Springy(x) -> Sphingine(x)) -> therefore Sphingine(shurwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Cheslie is blithe. Cheslie is insectan. Jarrett is primo. Jarrett is unvarying. Jarrett is insectan. Tine is insectan. Rebecka is postwar. All unvarying people are coccygeal. Red people are coccygeal. Blue people are unvarying. Red, blithe people are primo. Blue, primo people are blithe. If someone is insectan then they are postwar. If Tine is postwar and Tine is blithe then Tine is insectan. Big people are insectan. Rebecka is unvarying.", "logic": "\nBlithe(cheslie)\nInsectan(cheslie)\nPrimo(jarrett)\nUnvarying(jarrett)\nInsectan(jarrett)\nInsectan(tine)\nPostwar(rebecka)\nforall x (Unvarying(x) -> Coccygeal(x))\nforall x (Postwar(x) -> Coccygeal(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nforall x (Postwar(x) and Blithe(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) and Primo(x) -> Blithe(x))\nforall x (Insectan(x) -> Postwar(x))\nPostwar(tine) and Blithe(tine) -> Insectan(tine)\nforall x (Primo(x) -> Insectan(x))\n\nUnvarying(rebecka)\n\nPostwar(rebecka) and forall x (Postwar(x) -> Coccygeal(x)) -> therefore Coccygeal(rebecka) Coccygeal(rebecka) and forall x (Coccygeal(x) -> Unvarying(x)) -> therefore Unvarying(rebecka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Carl is rich. Carl is heraldist. Stephani is resistless. Stephani is isomeric. Stephani is heraldist. Abraham is heraldist. Garfinkel is coital. All isomeric people are cryptical. Red people are cryptical. Blue people are isomeric. Red, rich people are resistless. Blue, resistless people are rich. If someone is heraldist then they are coital. If Abraham is coital and Abraham is rich then Abraham is heraldist. Big people are heraldist. Abraham is not cryptical.", "logic": "\nRich(carl)\nHeraldist(carl)\nResistless(stephani)\nIsomeric(stephani)\nHeraldist(stephani)\nHeraldist(abraham)\nCoital(garfinkel)\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Cryptical(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) -> Cryptical(x))\nforall x (Cryptical(x) -> Isomeric(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) and Rich(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Cryptical(x) and Resistless(x) -> Rich(x))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) -> Coital(x))\nCoital(abraham) and Rich(abraham) -> Heraldist(abraham)\nforall x (Resistless(x) -> Heraldist(x))\n\nnot Cryptical(abraham)\n\nHeraldist(abraham) and forall x (Heraldist(x) -> Coital(x)) -> therefore Coital(abraham) Coital(abraham) and forall x (Coital(x) -> Cryptical(x)) -> therefore Cryptical(abraham)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Halie is suntanned. Halie is appetising. Beck is starved. Beck is amethyst. Beck is appetising. Gusti is appetising. Marrilee is poorly. All amethyst people are admissive. Red people are admissive. Blue people are amethyst. Red, suntanned people are starved. Blue, starved people are suntanned. If someone is appetising then they are poorly. If Gusti is poorly and Gusti is suntanned then Gusti is appetising. Big people are appetising. Gusti is amethyst.", "logic": "\nSuntanned(halie)\nAppetising(halie)\nStarved(beck)\nAmethyst(beck)\nAppetising(beck)\nAppetising(gusti)\nPoorly(marrilee)\nforall x (Amethyst(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Poorly(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nforall x (Poorly(x) and Suntanned(x) -> Starved(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) and Starved(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Poorly(x))\nPoorly(gusti) and Suntanned(gusti) -> Appetising(gusti)\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Appetising(x))\n\nAmethyst(gusti)\n\nAppetising(gusti) and forall x (Appetising(x) -> Poorly(x)) -> therefore Poorly(gusti) Poorly(gusti) and forall x (Poorly(x) -> Admissive(x)) -> therefore Admissive(gusti) Admissive(gusti) and forall x (Admissive(x) -> Amethyst(x)) -> therefore Amethyst(gusti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Eberhard is viewable. Eberhard is lightless. Gaylene is sold. Gaylene is naval. Gaylene is lightless. Tersina is lightless. Joscelin is insulting. All naval people are regnant. Red people are regnant. Blue people are naval. Red, viewable people are sold. Blue, sold people are viewable. If someone is lightless then they are insulting. If Tersina is insulting and Tersina is viewable then Tersina is lightless. Big people are lightless. Eberhard is not naval.", "logic": "\nViewable(eberhard)\nLightless(eberhard)\nSold(gaylene)\nNaval(gaylene)\nLightless(gaylene)\nLightless(tersina)\nInsulting(joscelin)\nforall x (Naval(x) -> Regnant(x))\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Regnant(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) -> Naval(x))\nforall x (Insulting(x) and Viewable(x) -> Sold(x))\nforall x (Regnant(x) and Sold(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Lightless(x) -> Insulting(x))\nInsulting(tersina) and Viewable(tersina) -> Lightless(tersina)\nforall x (Sold(x) -> Lightless(x))\n\nnot Naval(eberhard)\n\nLightless(eberhard) and forall x (Lightless(x) -> Insulting(x)) -> therefore Insulting(eberhard) Insulting(eberhard) and forall x (Insulting(x) -> Regnant(x)) -> therefore Regnant(eberhard) Regnant(eberhard) and forall x (Regnant(x) -> Naval(x)) -> therefore Naval(eberhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Nunzio is aching. Nunzio is czaristic. Lynnea is disturbed. Lynnea is northwest. Lynnea is czaristic. Daniel is czaristic. Cati is groundless. All northwest people are trojan. Red people are trojan. Blue people are northwest. Red, aching people are disturbed. Blue, disturbed people are aching. If someone is czaristic then they are groundless. If Daniel is groundless and Daniel is aching then Daniel is czaristic. Big people are czaristic. Cati is not aching.", "logic": "\nAching(nunzio)\nCzaristic(nunzio)\nDisturbed(lynnea)\nNorthwest(lynnea)\nCzaristic(lynnea)\nCzaristic(daniel)\nGroundless(cati)\nforall x (Northwest(x) -> Trojan(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Trojan(x))\nforall x (Trojan(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) and Aching(x) -> Disturbed(x))\nforall x (Trojan(x) and Disturbed(x) -> Aching(x))\nforall x (Czaristic(x) -> Groundless(x))\nGroundless(daniel) and Aching(daniel) -> Czaristic(daniel)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Czaristic(x))\n\nnot Aching(cati)\n\nforall x (Trojan(x) and Disturbed(x) -> Aching(x)) <- forall x (Groundless(x) and Aching(x) -> Disturbed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Amelia is stitched. Amelia is depressing. Chelsae is melting. Chelsae is bermudan. Chelsae is depressing. Gabey is depressing. Tara is projectile. All bermudan people are homoerotic. Red people are homoerotic. Blue people are bermudan. Red, stitched people are melting. Blue, melting people are stitched. If someone is depressing then they are projectile. If Gabey is projectile and Gabey is stitched then Gabey is depressing. Big people are depressing. Gabey is melting.", "logic": "\nStitched(amelia)\nDepressing(amelia)\nMelting(chelsae)\nBermudan(chelsae)\nDepressing(chelsae)\nDepressing(gabey)\nProjectile(tara)\nforall x (Bermudan(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Projectile(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Homoerotic(x) -> Bermudan(x))\nforall x (Projectile(x) and Stitched(x) -> Melting(x))\nforall x (Homoerotic(x) and Melting(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Projectile(x))\nProjectile(gabey) and Stitched(gabey) -> Depressing(gabey)\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Depressing(x))\n\nMelting(gabey)\n\nforall x (Projectile(x) and Stitched(x) -> Melting(x)) <- forall x (Homoerotic(x) and Melting(x) -> Stitched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Nichols is kempt. Nichols is wimpy. Nessie is swooning. Nessie is embonpoint. Nessie is wimpy. Orin is wimpy. Sidney is sickish. All embonpoint people are lazy. Red people are lazy. Blue people are embonpoint. Red, kempt people are swooning. Blue, swooning people are kempt. If someone is wimpy then they are sickish. If Orin is sickish and Orin is kempt then Orin is wimpy. Big people are wimpy. Sidney is not wimpy.", "logic": "\nKempt(nichols)\nWimpy(nichols)\nSwooning(nessie)\nEmbonpoint(nessie)\nWimpy(nessie)\nWimpy(orin)\nSickish(sidney)\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) -> Lazy(x))\nforall x (Lazy(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Sickish(x) and Kempt(x) -> Swooning(x))\nforall x (Lazy(x) and Swooning(x) -> Kempt(x))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) -> Sickish(x))\nSickish(orin) and Kempt(orin) -> Wimpy(orin)\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> Wimpy(x))\n\nnot Wimpy(sidney)\n\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> Wimpy(x)) <- forall x (Sickish(x) and Kempt(x) -> Swooning(x)) <- forall x (Lazy(x) and Swooning(x) -> Kempt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Rosemaria is disabling. Rosemaria is posterior. Pamella is puny. Pamella is overcast. Pamella is posterior. Hiro is posterior. Fredrika is discreet. All overcast people are stagy. Red people are stagy. Blue people are overcast. Red, disabling people are puny. Blue, puny people are disabling. If someone is posterior then they are discreet. If Hiro is discreet and Hiro is disabling then Hiro is posterior. Big people are posterior. Hiro is disabling.", "logic": "\nDisabling(rosemaria)\nPosterior(rosemaria)\nPuny(pamella)\nOvercast(pamella)\nPosterior(pamella)\nPosterior(hiro)\nDiscreet(fredrika)\nforall x (Overcast(x) -> Stagy(x))\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Stagy(x))\nforall x (Stagy(x) -> Overcast(x))\nforall x (Discreet(x) and Disabling(x) -> Puny(x))\nforall x (Stagy(x) and Puny(x) -> Disabling(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Discreet(x))\nDiscreet(hiro) and Disabling(hiro) -> Posterior(hiro)\nforall x (Puny(x) -> Posterior(x))\n\nDisabling(hiro)\n\nforall x (Stagy(x) and Puny(x) -> Disabling(x)) <- forall x (Discreet(x) and Disabling(x) -> Puny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Arabela is behavioral. Arabela is accurst. Cornelle is interred. Cornelle is crumbly. Cornelle is accurst. Xylia is accurst. Ebeneser is aecial. All crumbly people are adjustable. Red people are adjustable. Blue people are crumbly. Red, behavioral people are interred. Blue, interred people are behavioral. If someone is accurst then they are aecial. If Xylia is aecial and Xylia is behavioral then Xylia is accurst. Big people are accurst. Ebeneser is not kind.", "logic": "\nBehavioral(arabela)\nAccurst(arabela)\nInterred(cornelle)\nCrumbly(cornelle)\nAccurst(cornelle)\nAccurst(xylia)\nAecial(ebeneser)\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nforall x (Aecial(x) and Behavioral(x) -> Interred(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) and Interred(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Accurst(x) -> Aecial(x))\nAecial(xylia) and Behavioral(xylia) -> Accurst(xylia)\nforall x (Interred(x) -> Accurst(x))\n\nnot Kind(ebeneser)\n\nnot Kind(ebeneser) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Ephram is minty. Ephram is addible. Rosaline is involved. Rosaline is nativist. Rosaline is addible. Annalise is addible. Jeanna is prognathic. All nativist people are fernless. Red people are fernless. Blue people are nativist. Red, minty people are involved. Blue, involved people are minty. If someone is addible then they are prognathic. If Annalise is prognathic and Annalise is minty then Annalise is addible. Big people are addible. Rosaline is kind.", "logic": "\nMinty(ephram)\nAddible(ephram)\nInvolved(rosaline)\nNativist(rosaline)\nAddible(rosaline)\nAddible(annalise)\nPrognathic(jeanna)\nforall x (Nativist(x) -> Fernless(x))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) -> Fernless(x))\nforall x (Fernless(x) -> Nativist(x))\nforall x (Prognathic(x) and Minty(x) -> Involved(x))\nforall x (Fernless(x) and Involved(x) -> Minty(x))\nforall x (Addible(x) -> Prognathic(x))\nPrognathic(annalise) and Minty(annalise) -> Addible(annalise)\nforall x (Involved(x) -> Addible(x))\n\nKind(rosaline)\n\nKind(rosaline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Dyann is catarrhine. Dyann is lettered. Zechariah is spastic. Zechariah is upwind. Zechariah is lettered. Rhianna is lettered. Braden is envious. All upwind people are lxvi. Red people are lxvi. Blue people are upwind. Red, catarrhine people are spastic. Blue, spastic people are catarrhine. If someone is lettered then they are envious. If Rhianna is envious and Rhianna is catarrhine then Rhianna is lettered. Big people are lettered. Dyann is not kind.", "logic": "\nCatarrhine(dyann)\nLettered(dyann)\nSpastic(zechariah)\nUpwind(zechariah)\nLettered(zechariah)\nLettered(rhianna)\nEnvious(braden)\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Lxvi(x) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) and Catarrhine(x) -> Spastic(x))\nforall x (Lxvi(x) and Spastic(x) -> Catarrhine(x))\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Envious(x))\nEnvious(rhianna) and Catarrhine(rhianna) -> Lettered(rhianna)\nforall x (Spastic(x) -> Lettered(x))\n\nnot Kind(dyann)\n\nnot Kind(dyann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Joly is praetorial. Joly is tilled. Broddy is wrought. Broddy is remote. Broddy is tilled. Maye is tilled. Shannah is bulbous. All remote people are crank. Red people are crank. Blue people are remote. Red, praetorial people are wrought. Blue, wrought people are praetorial. If someone is tilled then they are bulbous. If Maye is bulbous and Maye is praetorial then Maye is tilled. Big people are tilled. Maye is kind.", "logic": "\nPraetorial(joly)\nTilled(joly)\nWrought(broddy)\nRemote(broddy)\nTilled(broddy)\nTilled(maye)\nBulbous(shannah)\nforall x (Remote(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) -> Remote(x))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) and Praetorial(x) -> Wrought(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) and Wrought(x) -> Praetorial(x))\nforall x (Tilled(x) -> Bulbous(x))\nBulbous(maye) and Praetorial(maye) -> Tilled(maye)\nforall x (Wrought(x) -> Tilled(x))\n\nKind(maye)\n\nKind(maye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-39"} {"premises": "Rolf is placating. Rolf is breezy. Rolf is ptolemaic. Rolf is ammoniac. Rolf is vestibular. Erastus is ptolemaic. Erastus is ammoniac. Erastus is vestibular. Erastus is harmonized. Britt is breezy. Britt is vestibular. Britt is harmonized. If someone is ptolemaic and breezy then they are placating. All placating, sedentary people are vestibular. All breezy, sedentary people are ptolemaic. If someone is harmonized and ammoniac then they are sedentary. If Rolf is breezy and Rolf is sedentary then Rolf is ptolemaic. If Britt is placating then Britt is ptolemaic. If Britt is harmonized and Britt is breezy then Britt is placating. If someone is placating and ptolemaic then they are ammoniac. Britt is vestibular.", "logic": "\nPlacating(rolf)\nBreezy(rolf)\nPtolemaic(rolf)\nAmmoniac(rolf)\nVestibular(rolf)\nPtolemaic(erastus)\nAmmoniac(erastus)\nVestibular(erastus)\nHarmonized(erastus)\nBreezy(britt)\nVestibular(britt)\nHarmonized(britt)\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Breezy(x) -> Placating(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) and Sedentary(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Breezy(x) and Sedentary(x) -> Ptolemaic(x))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and Ammoniac(x) -> Sedentary(x))\nBreezy(rolf) and Sedentary(rolf) -> Ptolemaic(rolf)\nPlacating(britt) -> Ptolemaic(britt)\nHarmonized(britt) and Breezy(britt) -> Placating(britt)\nforall x (Placating(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\n\nVestibular(britt)\n\ntherefore Vestibular(britt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Davidson is unveiled. Davidson is untasted. Davidson is livable. Davidson is neat. Davidson is motherly. Siouxie is livable. Siouxie is neat. Siouxie is motherly. Siouxie is ageless. Garrett is untasted. Garrett is motherly. Garrett is ageless. If someone is livable and untasted then they are unveiled. All unveiled, sottish people are motherly. All untasted, sottish people are livable. If someone is ageless and neat then they are sottish. If Davidson is untasted and Davidson is sottish then Davidson is livable. If Garrett is unveiled then Garrett is livable. If Garrett is ageless and Garrett is untasted then Garrett is unveiled. If someone is unveiled and livable then they are neat. Davidson is not unveiled.", "logic": "\nUnveiled(davidson)\nUntasted(davidson)\nLivable(davidson)\nNeat(davidson)\nMotherly(davidson)\nLivable(siouxie)\nNeat(siouxie)\nMotherly(siouxie)\nAgeless(siouxie)\nUntasted(garrett)\nMotherly(garrett)\nAgeless(garrett)\nforall x (Livable(x) and Untasted(x) -> Unveiled(x))\nforall x (Unveiled(x) and Sottish(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Untasted(x) and Sottish(x) -> Livable(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) and Neat(x) -> Sottish(x))\nUntasted(davidson) and Sottish(davidson) -> Livable(davidson)\nUnveiled(garrett) -> Livable(garrett)\nAgeless(garrett) and Untasted(garrett) -> Unveiled(garrett)\nforall x (Unveiled(x) and Livable(x) -> Neat(x))\n\nnot Unveiled(davidson)\n\ntherefore Unveiled(davidson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Bree is unskilled. Bree is dusky. Bree is audenesque. Bree is anechoic. Bree is traveled. Juliana is audenesque. Juliana is anechoic. Juliana is traveled. Juliana is flat. Jessamine is dusky. Jessamine is traveled. Jessamine is flat. If someone is audenesque and dusky then they are unskilled. All unskilled, opposite people are traveled. All dusky, opposite people are audenesque. If someone is flat and anechoic then they are opposite. If Bree is dusky and Bree is opposite then Bree is audenesque. If Jessamine is unskilled then Jessamine is audenesque. If Jessamine is flat and Jessamine is dusky then Jessamine is unskilled. If someone is unskilled and audenesque then they are anechoic. Jessamine is unskilled.", "logic": "\nUnskilled(bree)\nDusky(bree)\nAudenesque(bree)\nAnechoic(bree)\nTraveled(bree)\nAudenesque(juliana)\nAnechoic(juliana)\nTraveled(juliana)\nFlat(juliana)\nDusky(jessamine)\nTraveled(jessamine)\nFlat(jessamine)\nforall x (Audenesque(x) and Dusky(x) -> Unskilled(x))\nforall x (Unskilled(x) and Opposite(x) -> Traveled(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Opposite(x) -> Audenesque(x))\nforall x (Flat(x) and Anechoic(x) -> Opposite(x))\nDusky(bree) and Opposite(bree) -> Audenesque(bree)\nUnskilled(jessamine) -> Audenesque(jessamine)\nFlat(jessamine) and Dusky(jessamine) -> Unskilled(jessamine)\nforall x (Unskilled(x) and Audenesque(x) -> Anechoic(x))\n\nUnskilled(jessamine)\n\nFlat(jessamine) and Dusky(jessamine) and Flat(jessamine) and Dusky(jessamine) -> Unskilled(jessamine) -> therefore Unskilled(jessamine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Addis is unwrapped. Addis is glacial. Addis is unwary. Addis is iatrogenic. Addis is callous. Ulrike is unwary. Ulrike is iatrogenic. Ulrike is callous. Ulrike is lambent. Dara is glacial. Dara is callous. Dara is lambent. If someone is unwary and glacial then they are unwrapped. All unwrapped, trojan people are callous. All glacial, trojan people are unwary. If someone is lambent and iatrogenic then they are trojan. If Addis is glacial and Addis is trojan then Addis is unwary. If Dara is unwrapped then Dara is unwary. If Dara is lambent and Dara is glacial then Dara is unwrapped. If someone is unwrapped and unwary then they are iatrogenic. Ulrike is not trojan.", "logic": "\nUnwrapped(addis)\nGlacial(addis)\nUnwary(addis)\nIatrogenic(addis)\nCallous(addis)\nUnwary(ulrike)\nIatrogenic(ulrike)\nCallous(ulrike)\nLambent(ulrike)\nGlacial(dara)\nCallous(dara)\nLambent(dara)\nforall x (Unwary(x) and Glacial(x) -> Unwrapped(x))\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) and Trojan(x) -> Callous(x))\nforall x (Glacial(x) and Trojan(x) -> Unwary(x))\nforall x (Lambent(x) and Iatrogenic(x) -> Trojan(x))\nGlacial(addis) and Trojan(addis) -> Unwary(addis)\nUnwrapped(dara) -> Unwary(dara)\nLambent(dara) and Glacial(dara) -> Unwrapped(dara)\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) and Unwary(x) -> Iatrogenic(x))\n\nnot Trojan(ulrike)\n\nLambent(ulrike) and Iatrogenic(ulrike) and forall x (Lambent(x) and Iatrogenic(x) -> Trojan(x)) -> therefore Trojan(ulrike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Marcus is sportive. Marcus is inaccurate. Marcus is coruscant. Marcus is winless. Marcus is validatory. Minette is coruscant. Minette is winless. Minette is validatory. Minette is keyless. Harmony is inaccurate. Harmony is validatory. Harmony is keyless. If someone is coruscant and inaccurate then they are sportive. All sportive, habitable people are validatory. All inaccurate, habitable people are coruscant. If someone is keyless and winless then they are habitable. If Marcus is inaccurate and Marcus is habitable then Marcus is coruscant. If Harmony is sportive then Harmony is coruscant. If Harmony is keyless and Harmony is inaccurate then Harmony is sportive. If someone is sportive and coruscant then they are winless. Harmony is coruscant.", "logic": "\nSportive(marcus)\nInaccurate(marcus)\nCoruscant(marcus)\nWinless(marcus)\nValidatory(marcus)\nCoruscant(minette)\nWinless(minette)\nValidatory(minette)\nKeyless(minette)\nInaccurate(harmony)\nValidatory(harmony)\nKeyless(harmony)\nforall x (Coruscant(x) and Inaccurate(x) -> Sportive(x))\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Habitable(x) -> Validatory(x))\nforall x (Inaccurate(x) and Habitable(x) -> Coruscant(x))\nforall x (Keyless(x) and Winless(x) -> Habitable(x))\nInaccurate(marcus) and Habitable(marcus) -> Coruscant(marcus)\nSportive(harmony) -> Coruscant(harmony)\nKeyless(harmony) and Inaccurate(harmony) -> Sportive(harmony)\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Coruscant(x) -> Winless(x))\n\nCoruscant(harmony)\n\nKeyless(harmony) and Inaccurate(harmony) and Keyless(harmony) and Inaccurate(harmony) -> Sportive(harmony) -> therefore Sportive(harmony) Sportive(harmony) and Sportive(harmony) -> Coruscant(harmony) -> therefore Coruscant(harmony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Gaston is homostyled. Gaston is inane. Gaston is orphaned. Gaston is autarkical. Gaston is falcate. Sandor is orphaned. Sandor is autarkical. Sandor is falcate. Sandor is boon. Charmion is inane. Charmion is falcate. Charmion is boon. If someone is orphaned and inane then they are homostyled. All homostyled, concrete people are falcate. All inane, concrete people are orphaned. If someone is boon and autarkical then they are concrete. If Gaston is inane and Gaston is concrete then Gaston is orphaned. If Charmion is homostyled then Charmion is orphaned. If Charmion is boon and Charmion is inane then Charmion is homostyled. If someone is homostyled and orphaned then they are autarkical. Charmion is not orphaned.", "logic": "\nHomostyled(gaston)\nInane(gaston)\nOrphaned(gaston)\nAutarkical(gaston)\nFalcate(gaston)\nOrphaned(sandor)\nAutarkical(sandor)\nFalcate(sandor)\nBoon(sandor)\nInane(charmion)\nFalcate(charmion)\nBoon(charmion)\nforall x (Orphaned(x) and Inane(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Concrete(x) -> Falcate(x))\nforall x (Inane(x) and Concrete(x) -> Orphaned(x))\nforall x (Boon(x) and Autarkical(x) -> Concrete(x))\nInane(gaston) and Concrete(gaston) -> Orphaned(gaston)\nHomostyled(charmion) -> Orphaned(charmion)\nBoon(charmion) and Inane(charmion) -> Homostyled(charmion)\nforall x (Homostyled(x) and Orphaned(x) -> Autarkical(x))\n\nnot Orphaned(charmion)\n\nBoon(charmion) and Inane(charmion) and Boon(charmion) and Inane(charmion) -> Homostyled(charmion) -> therefore Homostyled(charmion) Homostyled(charmion) and Homostyled(charmion) -> Orphaned(charmion) -> therefore Orphaned(charmion)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Fanchon is misleading. Fanchon is befitting. Fanchon is local. Fanchon is echolike. Fanchon is doddering. Felita is local. Felita is echolike. Felita is doddering. Felita is edged. Rhoda is befitting. Rhoda is doddering. Rhoda is edged. If someone is local and befitting then they are misleading. All misleading, equestrian people are doddering. All befitting, equestrian people are local. If someone is edged and echolike then they are equestrian. If Fanchon is befitting and Fanchon is equestrian then Fanchon is local. If Rhoda is misleading then Rhoda is local. If Rhoda is edged and Rhoda is befitting then Rhoda is misleading. If someone is misleading and local then they are echolike. Rhoda is echolike.", "logic": "\nMisleading(fanchon)\nBefitting(fanchon)\nLocal(fanchon)\nEcholike(fanchon)\nDoddering(fanchon)\nLocal(felita)\nEcholike(felita)\nDoddering(felita)\nEdged(felita)\nBefitting(rhoda)\nDoddering(rhoda)\nEdged(rhoda)\nforall x (Local(x) and Befitting(x) -> Misleading(x))\nforall x (Misleading(x) and Equestrian(x) -> Doddering(x))\nforall x (Befitting(x) and Equestrian(x) -> Local(x))\nforall x (Edged(x) and Echolike(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nBefitting(fanchon) and Equestrian(fanchon) -> Local(fanchon)\nMisleading(rhoda) -> Local(rhoda)\nEdged(rhoda) and Befitting(rhoda) -> Misleading(rhoda)\nforall x (Misleading(x) and Local(x) -> Echolike(x))\n\nEcholike(rhoda)\n\nEdged(rhoda) and Befitting(rhoda) and Edged(rhoda) and Befitting(rhoda) -> Misleading(rhoda) -> therefore Misleading(rhoda) Edged(rhoda) and Befitting(rhoda) and Edged(rhoda) and Befitting(rhoda) -> Misleading(rhoda) -> therefore Misleading(rhoda) Misleading(rhoda) and Misleading(rhoda) -> Local(rhoda) -> therefore Local(rhoda) Misleading(rhoda) and Local(rhoda) and forall x (Misleading(x) and Local(x) -> Echolike(x)) -> therefore Echolike(rhoda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Robinet is heathlike. Robinet is dolomitic. Robinet is rhymed. Robinet is binate. Robinet is imposing. Vinni is rhymed. Vinni is binate. Vinni is imposing. Vinni is rewardful. Jorge is dolomitic. Jorge is imposing. Jorge is rewardful. If someone is rhymed and dolomitic then they are heathlike. All heathlike, profuse people are imposing. All dolomitic, profuse people are rhymed. If someone is rewardful and binate then they are profuse. If Robinet is dolomitic and Robinet is profuse then Robinet is rhymed. If Jorge is heathlike then Jorge is rhymed. If Jorge is rewardful and Jorge is dolomitic then Jorge is heathlike. If someone is heathlike and rhymed then they are binate. Jorge is not binate.", "logic": "\nHeathlike(robinet)\nDolomitic(robinet)\nRhymed(robinet)\nBinate(robinet)\nImposing(robinet)\nRhymed(vinni)\nBinate(vinni)\nImposing(vinni)\nRewardful(vinni)\nDolomitic(jorge)\nImposing(jorge)\nRewardful(jorge)\nforall x (Rhymed(x) and Dolomitic(x) -> Heathlike(x))\nforall x (Heathlike(x) and Profuse(x) -> Imposing(x))\nforall x (Dolomitic(x) and Profuse(x) -> Rhymed(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) and Binate(x) -> Profuse(x))\nDolomitic(robinet) and Profuse(robinet) -> Rhymed(robinet)\nHeathlike(jorge) -> Rhymed(jorge)\nRewardful(jorge) and Dolomitic(jorge) -> Heathlike(jorge)\nforall x (Heathlike(x) and Rhymed(x) -> Binate(x))\n\nnot Binate(jorge)\n\nRewardful(jorge) and Dolomitic(jorge) and Rewardful(jorge) and Dolomitic(jorge) -> Heathlike(jorge) -> therefore Heathlike(jorge) Rewardful(jorge) and Dolomitic(jorge) and Rewardful(jorge) and Dolomitic(jorge) -> Heathlike(jorge) -> therefore Heathlike(jorge) Heathlike(jorge) and Heathlike(jorge) -> Rhymed(jorge) -> therefore Rhymed(jorge) Heathlike(jorge) and Rhymed(jorge) and forall x (Heathlike(x) and Rhymed(x) -> Binate(x)) -> therefore Binate(jorge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Brynna is buccal. Brynna is campestral. Brynna is metatarsal. Brynna is meshuga. Brynna is juiceless. Chriss is metatarsal. Chriss is meshuga. Chriss is juiceless. Chriss is frowzy. Marlon is campestral. Marlon is juiceless. Marlon is frowzy. If someone is metatarsal and campestral then they are buccal. All buccal, danish people are juiceless. All campestral, danish people are metatarsal. If someone is frowzy and meshuga then they are danish. If Brynna is campestral and Brynna is danish then Brynna is metatarsal. If Marlon is buccal then Marlon is metatarsal. If Marlon is frowzy and Marlon is campestral then Marlon is buccal. If someone is buccal and metatarsal then they are meshuga. Brynna is not danish.", "logic": "\nBuccal(brynna)\nCampestral(brynna)\nMetatarsal(brynna)\nMeshuga(brynna)\nJuiceless(brynna)\nMetatarsal(chriss)\nMeshuga(chriss)\nJuiceless(chriss)\nFrowzy(chriss)\nCampestral(marlon)\nJuiceless(marlon)\nFrowzy(marlon)\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) and Campestral(x) -> Buccal(x))\nforall x (Buccal(x) and Danish(x) -> Juiceless(x))\nforall x (Campestral(x) and Danish(x) -> Metatarsal(x))\nforall x (Frowzy(x) and Meshuga(x) -> Danish(x))\nCampestral(brynna) and Danish(brynna) -> Metatarsal(brynna)\nBuccal(marlon) -> Metatarsal(marlon)\nFrowzy(marlon) and Campestral(marlon) -> Buccal(marlon)\nforall x (Buccal(x) and Metatarsal(x) -> Meshuga(x))\n\nnot Danish(brynna)\n\nforall x (Frowzy(x) and Meshuga(x) -> Danish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Ashish is maximising. Ashish is simplex. Ashish is finite. Ashish is ungual. Ashish is crippling. Rafaela is finite. Rafaela is ungual. Rafaela is crippling. Rafaela is elegant. Aubrey is simplex. Aubrey is crippling. Aubrey is elegant. If someone is finite and simplex then they are maximising. All maximising, unannealed people are crippling. All simplex, unannealed people are finite. If someone is elegant and ungual then they are unannealed. If Ashish is simplex and Ashish is unannealed then Ashish is finite. If Aubrey is maximising then Aubrey is finite. If Aubrey is elegant and Aubrey is simplex then Aubrey is maximising. If someone is maximising and finite then they are ungual. Rafaela is maximising.", "logic": "\nMaximising(ashish)\nSimplex(ashish)\nFinite(ashish)\nUngual(ashish)\nCrippling(ashish)\nFinite(rafaela)\nUngual(rafaela)\nCrippling(rafaela)\nElegant(rafaela)\nSimplex(aubrey)\nCrippling(aubrey)\nElegant(aubrey)\nforall x (Finite(x) and Simplex(x) -> Maximising(x))\nforall x (Maximising(x) and Unannealed(x) -> Crippling(x))\nforall x (Simplex(x) and Unannealed(x) -> Finite(x))\nforall x (Elegant(x) and Ungual(x) -> Unannealed(x))\nSimplex(ashish) and Unannealed(ashish) -> Finite(ashish)\nMaximising(aubrey) -> Finite(aubrey)\nElegant(aubrey) and Simplex(aubrey) -> Maximising(aubrey)\nforall x (Maximising(x) and Finite(x) -> Ungual(x))\n\nMaximising(rafaela)\n\nforall x (Finite(x) and Simplex(x) -> Maximising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Joelle is pulmonic. Joelle is brimming. Joelle is cutting. Joelle is poor. Joelle is arteriolar. Brendan is cutting. Brendan is poor. Brendan is arteriolar. Brendan is steadied. Gay is brimming. Gay is arteriolar. Gay is steadied. If someone is cutting and brimming then they are pulmonic. All pulmonic, fruitless people are arteriolar. All brimming, fruitless people are cutting. If someone is steadied and poor then they are fruitless. If Joelle is brimming and Joelle is fruitless then Joelle is cutting. If Gay is pulmonic then Gay is cutting. If Gay is steadied and Gay is brimming then Gay is pulmonic. If someone is pulmonic and cutting then they are poor. Joelle is not steadied.", "logic": "\nPulmonic(joelle)\nBrimming(joelle)\nCutting(joelle)\nPoor(joelle)\nArteriolar(joelle)\nCutting(brendan)\nPoor(brendan)\nArteriolar(brendan)\nSteadied(brendan)\nBrimming(gay)\nArteriolar(gay)\nSteadied(gay)\nforall x (Cutting(x) and Brimming(x) -> Pulmonic(x))\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) and Fruitless(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nforall x (Brimming(x) and Fruitless(x) -> Cutting(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) and Poor(x) -> Fruitless(x))\nBrimming(joelle) and Fruitless(joelle) -> Cutting(joelle)\nPulmonic(gay) -> Cutting(gay)\nSteadied(gay) and Brimming(gay) -> Pulmonic(gay)\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) and Cutting(x) -> Poor(x))\n\nnot Steadied(joelle)\n\nnot Steadied(joelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "Bernadene is skirting. Bernadene is delicious. Bernadene is glacial. Bernadene is barbellate. Bernadene is buttony. Stevy is glacial. Stevy is barbellate. Stevy is buttony. Stevy is pitched. Xylina is delicious. Xylina is buttony. Xylina is pitched. If someone is glacial and delicious then they are skirting. All skirting, palmlike people are buttony. All delicious, palmlike people are glacial. If someone is pitched and barbellate then they are palmlike. If Bernadene is delicious and Bernadene is palmlike then Bernadene is glacial. If Xylina is skirting then Xylina is glacial. If Xylina is pitched and Xylina is delicious then Xylina is skirting. If someone is skirting and glacial then they are barbellate. Stevy is delicious.", "logic": "\nSkirting(bernadene)\nDelicious(bernadene)\nGlacial(bernadene)\nBarbellate(bernadene)\nButtony(bernadene)\nGlacial(stevy)\nBarbellate(stevy)\nButtony(stevy)\nPitched(stevy)\nDelicious(xylina)\nButtony(xylina)\nPitched(xylina)\nforall x (Glacial(x) and Delicious(x) -> Skirting(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) and Palmlike(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Delicious(x) and Palmlike(x) -> Glacial(x))\nforall x (Pitched(x) and Barbellate(x) -> Palmlike(x))\nDelicious(bernadene) and Palmlike(bernadene) -> Glacial(bernadene)\nSkirting(xylina) -> Glacial(xylina)\nPitched(xylina) and Delicious(xylina) -> Skirting(xylina)\nforall x (Skirting(x) and Glacial(x) -> Barbellate(x))\n\nDelicious(stevy)\n\nDelicious(stevy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-920"} {"premises": "The hannah speed the korie. The korie speed the hannah. If something submit the korie then the korie is mangey. If something speed the hannah then it submit the korie. If something is romance and it submit the hannah then it submit the korie. The hannah speed the korie.", "logic": "\nSpeed(hannah, korie)\nSpeed(korie, hannah)\nforall x (Submit(x, korie) -> Mangey(korie))\nforall x (Speed(x, hannah) -> Submit(x, korie))\nforall x (Romance(x) and Submit(x, hannah) -> Submit(x, korie))\n\nSpeed(hannah, korie)\n\ntherefore Speed(hannah, korie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The willem elegise the niall. The niall elegise the willem. If something liken the niall then the niall is resurgent. If something elegise the willem then it liken the niall. If something is viceregal and it liken the willem then it liken the niall. The willem does not eat the niall.", "logic": "\nElegise(willem, niall)\nElegise(niall, willem)\nforall x (Liken(x, niall) -> Resurgent(niall))\nforall x (Elegise(x, willem) -> Liken(x, niall))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) and Liken(x, willem) -> Liken(x, niall))\n\nnot Elegise(willem, niall)\n\ntherefore Elegise(willem, niall)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The hedi despond the rena. The rena despond the hedi. If something sight the rena then the rena is latter. If something despond the hedi then it sight the rena. If something is unweary and it sight the hedi then it sight the rena. The rena sight the rena.", "logic": "\nDespond(hedi, rena)\nDespond(rena, hedi)\nforall x (Sight(x, rena) -> Latter(rena))\nforall x (Despond(x, hedi) -> Sight(x, rena))\nforall x (Unweary(x) and Sight(x, hedi) -> Sight(x, rena))\n\nSight(rena, rena)\n\nDespond(rena, hedi) and forall x (Despond(x, hedi) -> Sight(x, rena)) -> therefore Sight(rena, rena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The nelle oversupply the thatch. The thatch oversupply the nelle. If something spoon the thatch then the thatch is glassless. If something oversupply the nelle then it spoon the thatch. If something is muzzy and it spoon the nelle then it spoon the thatch. The thatch does not visit the thatch.", "logic": "\nOversupply(nelle, thatch)\nOversupply(thatch, nelle)\nforall x (Spoon(x, thatch) -> Glassless(thatch))\nforall x (Oversupply(x, nelle) -> Spoon(x, thatch))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) and Spoon(x, nelle) -> Spoon(x, thatch))\n\nnot Spoon(thatch, thatch)\n\nOversupply(thatch, nelle) and forall x (Oversupply(x, nelle) -> Spoon(x, thatch)) -> therefore Spoon(thatch, thatch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The carlie exacerbate the nathanil. The nathanil exacerbate the carlie. If something blindfold the nathanil then the nathanil is unexcused. If something exacerbate the carlie then it blindfold the nathanil. If something is jainist and it blindfold the carlie then it blindfold the nathanil. The nathanil is unexcused.", "logic": "\nExacerbate(carlie, nathanil)\nExacerbate(nathanil, carlie)\nforall x (Blindfold(x, nathanil) -> Unexcused(nathanil))\nforall x (Exacerbate(x, carlie) -> Blindfold(x, nathanil))\nforall x (Jainist(x) and Blindfold(x, carlie) -> Blindfold(x, nathanil))\n\nUnexcused(nathanil)\n\nExacerbate(nathanil, carlie) and forall x (Exacerbate(x, carlie) -> Blindfold(x, nathanil)) -> therefore Blindfold(nathanil, nathanil) Blindfold(nathanil, nathanil) and forall x (Blindfold(x, nathanil) -> Unexcused(nathanil)) -> therefore Unexcused(nathanil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The dory memorise the orella. The orella memorise the dory. If something prevail the orella then the orella is confusing. If something memorise the dory then it prevail the orella. If something is intense and it prevail the dory then it prevail the orella. The orella is not confusing.", "logic": "\nMemorise(dory, orella)\nMemorise(orella, dory)\nforall x (Prevail(x, orella) -> Confusing(orella))\nforall x (Memorise(x, dory) -> Prevail(x, orella))\nforall x (Intense(x) and Prevail(x, dory) -> Prevail(x, orella))\n\nnot Confusing(orella)\n\nMemorise(orella, dory) and forall x (Memorise(x, dory) -> Prevail(x, orella)) -> therefore Prevail(orella, orella) Prevail(orella, orella) and forall x (Prevail(x, orella) -> Confusing(orella)) -> therefore Confusing(orella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The winifield disforest the brit. The brit disforest the winifield. If something brail the brit then the brit is jammed. If something disforest the winifield then it brail the brit. If something is unthought and it brail the winifield then it brail the brit. The winifield does not visit the brit.", "logic": "\nDisforest(winifield, brit)\nDisforest(brit, winifield)\nforall x (Brail(x, brit) -> Jammed(brit))\nforall x (Disforest(x, winifield) -> Brail(x, brit))\nforall x (Unthought(x) and Brail(x, winifield) -> Brail(x, brit))\n\nnot Brail(winifield, brit)\n\nforall x (Disforest(x, winifield) -> Brail(x, brit)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The cleland unbraid the lotti. The lotti unbraid the cleland. If something ghettoise the lotti then the lotti is unexceeded. If something unbraid the cleland then it ghettoise the lotti. If something is allergenic and it ghettoise the cleland then it ghettoise the lotti. The cleland ghettoise the cleland.", "logic": "\nUnbraid(cleland, lotti)\nUnbraid(lotti, cleland)\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, lotti) -> Unexceeded(lotti))\nforall x (Unbraid(x, cleland) -> Ghettoise(x, lotti))\nforall x (Allergenic(x) and Ghettoise(x, cleland) -> Ghettoise(x, lotti))\n\nGhettoise(cleland, cleland)\n\nGhettoise(cleland, cleland) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The durand mist the yettie. The yettie mist the durand. If something lignify the yettie then the yettie is placed. If something mist the durand then it lignify the yettie. If something is shaken and it lignify the durand then it lignify the yettie. The yettie is not nice.", "logic": "\nMist(durand, yettie)\nMist(yettie, durand)\nforall x (Lignify(x, yettie) -> Placed(yettie))\nforall x (Mist(x, durand) -> Lignify(x, yettie))\nforall x (Shaken(x) and Lignify(x, durand) -> Lignify(x, yettie))\n\nnot Nice(yettie)\n\nnot Nice(yettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The flint spout the walter. The walter spout the flint. If something obtain the walter then the walter is coalescent. If something spout the flint then it obtain the walter. If something is mucous and it obtain the flint then it obtain the walter. The flint is coalescent.", "logic": "\nSpout(flint, walter)\nSpout(walter, flint)\nforall x (Obtain(x, walter) -> Coalescent(walter))\nforall x (Spout(x, flint) -> Obtain(x, walter))\nforall x (Mucous(x) and Obtain(x, flint) -> Obtain(x, walter))\n\nCoalescent(flint)\n\nCoalescent(flint) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The henka higgle the nathanael. The nathanael higgle the henka. If something clump the nathanael then the nathanael is humified. If something higgle the henka then it clump the nathanael. If something is poor and it clump the henka then it clump the nathanael. The nathanael is not rough.", "logic": "\nHiggle(henka, nathanael)\nHiggle(nathanael, henka)\nforall x (Clump(x, nathanael) -> Humified(nathanael))\nforall x (Higgle(x, henka) -> Clump(x, nathanael))\nforall x (Poor(x) and Clump(x, henka) -> Clump(x, nathanael))\n\nnot Rough(nathanael)\n\nnot Rough(nathanael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The paulina monger the ainsley. The ainsley monger the paulina. If something snooker the ainsley then the ainsley is express. If something monger the paulina then it snooker the ainsley. If something is unmannered and it snooker the paulina then it snooker the ainsley. The ainsley is unmannered.", "logic": "\nMonger(paulina, ainsley)\nMonger(ainsley, paulina)\nforall x (Snooker(x, ainsley) -> Express(ainsley))\nforall x (Monger(x, paulina) -> Snooker(x, ainsley))\nforall x (Unmannered(x) and Snooker(x, paulina) -> Snooker(x, ainsley))\n\nUnmannered(ainsley)\n\nUnmannered(ainsley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-758"} {"premises": "The mignonne restate the sebastien. The mignonne restate the dottie. The mignonne subtend the dottie. The sebastien restate the mignonne. The sebastien is awheel. The sebastien is jammed. The sebastien is cycloidal. The sebastien lisp the dottie. The sebastien subtend the mignonne. The sebastien subtend the dottie. The dottie restate the mignonne. The dottie restate the sebastien. The dottie is awheel. The dottie is cycloidal. The dottie lisp the sebastien. The dottie subtend the sebastien. If the sebastien does not chase the dottie then the sebastien lisp the mignonne. If something lisp the mignonne then it is jammed. If something restate the mignonne and the mignonne restate the sebastien then the sebastien subtend the mignonne. If something restate the mignonne then the mignonne subtend the sebastien. If something restate the dottie and the dottie does not chase the mignonne then the mignonne does not see the dottie. If something subtend the dottie then the dottie restate the sebastien. The sebastien restate the mignonne.", "logic": "\nRestate(mignonne, sebastien)\nRestate(mignonne, dottie)\nSubtend(mignonne, dottie)\nRestate(sebastien, mignonne)\nAwheel(sebastien)\nJammed(sebastien)\nCycloidal(sebastien)\nLisp(sebastien, dottie)\nSubtend(sebastien, mignonne)\nSubtend(sebastien, dottie)\nRestate(dottie, mignonne)\nRestate(dottie, sebastien)\nAwheel(dottie)\nCycloidal(dottie)\nLisp(dottie, sebastien)\nSubtend(dottie, sebastien)\nnot Restate(sebastien, dottie) -> Lisp(sebastien, mignonne)\nforall x (Lisp(x, mignonne) -> Jammed(x))\nforall x (Restate(x, mignonne) and Restate(mignonne, sebastien) -> Subtend(sebastien, mignonne))\nforall x (Restate(x, mignonne) -> Subtend(mignonne, sebastien))\nforall x (Restate(x, dottie) and not Restate(dottie, mignonne) -> not Lisp(mignonne, dottie))\nforall x (Subtend(x, dottie) -> Restate(dottie, sebastien))\n\nRestate(sebastien, mignonne)\n\ntherefore Restate(sebastien, mignonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The giovanne misaddress the darbie. The giovanne misaddress the welsh. The giovanne glut the welsh. The darbie misaddress the giovanne. The darbie is dextrorse. The darbie is received. The darbie is feminine. The darbie clump the welsh. The darbie glut the giovanne. The darbie glut the welsh. The welsh misaddress the giovanne. The welsh misaddress the darbie. The welsh is dextrorse. The welsh is feminine. The welsh clump the darbie. The welsh glut the darbie. If the darbie does not chase the welsh then the darbie clump the giovanne. If something clump the giovanne then it is received. If something misaddress the giovanne and the giovanne misaddress the darbie then the darbie glut the giovanne. If something misaddress the giovanne then the giovanne glut the darbie. If something misaddress the welsh and the welsh does not chase the giovanne then the giovanne does not see the welsh. If something glut the welsh then the welsh misaddress the darbie. The welsh is not feminine.", "logic": "\nMisaddress(giovanne, darbie)\nMisaddress(giovanne, welsh)\nGlut(giovanne, welsh)\nMisaddress(darbie, giovanne)\nDextrorse(darbie)\nReceived(darbie)\nFeminine(darbie)\nClump(darbie, welsh)\nGlut(darbie, giovanne)\nGlut(darbie, welsh)\nMisaddress(welsh, giovanne)\nMisaddress(welsh, darbie)\nDextrorse(welsh)\nFeminine(welsh)\nClump(welsh, darbie)\nGlut(welsh, darbie)\nnot Misaddress(darbie, welsh) -> Clump(darbie, giovanne)\nforall x (Clump(x, giovanne) -> Received(x))\nforall x (Misaddress(x, giovanne) and Misaddress(giovanne, darbie) -> Glut(darbie, giovanne))\nforall x (Misaddress(x, giovanne) -> Glut(giovanne, darbie))\nforall x (Misaddress(x, welsh) and not Misaddress(welsh, giovanne) -> not Clump(giovanne, welsh))\nforall x (Glut(x, welsh) -> Misaddress(welsh, darbie))\n\nnot Feminine(welsh)\n\ntherefore Feminine(welsh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The nan maximize the lorena. The nan maximize the emerson. The nan duplicate the emerson. The lorena maximize the nan. The lorena is pituitary. The lorena is diarrhoeic. The lorena is bulky. The lorena yodel the emerson. The lorena duplicate the nan. The lorena duplicate the emerson. The emerson maximize the nan. The emerson maximize the lorena. The emerson is pituitary. The emerson is bulky. The emerson yodel the lorena. The emerson duplicate the lorena. If the lorena does not chase the emerson then the lorena yodel the nan. If something yodel the nan then it is diarrhoeic. If something maximize the nan and the nan maximize the lorena then the lorena duplicate the nan. If something maximize the nan then the nan duplicate the lorena. If something maximize the emerson and the emerson does not chase the nan then the nan does not see the emerson. If something duplicate the emerson then the emerson maximize the lorena. The nan duplicate the lorena.", "logic": "\nMaximize(nan, lorena)\nMaximize(nan, emerson)\nDuplicate(nan, emerson)\nMaximize(lorena, nan)\nPituitary(lorena)\nDiarrhoeic(lorena)\nBulky(lorena)\nYodel(lorena, emerson)\nDuplicate(lorena, nan)\nDuplicate(lorena, emerson)\nMaximize(emerson, nan)\nMaximize(emerson, lorena)\nPituitary(emerson)\nBulky(emerson)\nYodel(emerson, lorena)\nDuplicate(emerson, lorena)\nnot Maximize(lorena, emerson) -> Yodel(lorena, nan)\nforall x (Yodel(x, nan) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (Maximize(x, nan) and Maximize(nan, lorena) -> Duplicate(lorena, nan))\nforall x (Maximize(x, nan) -> Duplicate(nan, lorena))\nforall x (Maximize(x, emerson) and not Maximize(emerson, nan) -> not Yodel(nan, emerson))\nforall x (Duplicate(x, emerson) -> Maximize(emerson, lorena))\n\nDuplicate(nan, lorena)\n\nMaximize(emerson, nan) and forall x (Maximize(x, nan) -> Duplicate(nan, lorena)) -> therefore Duplicate(nan, lorena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The tore displume the emlynne. The tore displume the celine. The tore tutor the celine. The emlynne displume the tore. The emlynne is noncausal. The emlynne is moveable. The emlynne is permutable. The emlynne section the celine. The emlynne tutor the tore. The emlynne tutor the celine. The celine displume the tore. The celine displume the emlynne. The celine is noncausal. The celine is permutable. The celine section the emlynne. The celine tutor the emlynne. If the emlynne does not chase the celine then the emlynne section the tore. If something section the tore then it is moveable. If something displume the tore and the tore displume the emlynne then the emlynne tutor the tore. If something displume the tore then the tore tutor the emlynne. If something displume the celine and the celine does not chase the tore then the tore does not see the celine. If something tutor the celine then the celine displume the emlynne. The tore does not visit the emlynne.", "logic": "\nDisplume(tore, emlynne)\nDisplume(tore, celine)\nTutor(tore, celine)\nDisplume(emlynne, tore)\nNoncausal(emlynne)\nMoveable(emlynne)\nPermutable(emlynne)\nSection(emlynne, celine)\nTutor(emlynne, tore)\nTutor(emlynne, celine)\nDisplume(celine, tore)\nDisplume(celine, emlynne)\nNoncausal(celine)\nPermutable(celine)\nSection(celine, emlynne)\nTutor(celine, emlynne)\nnot Displume(emlynne, celine) -> Section(emlynne, tore)\nforall x (Section(x, tore) -> Moveable(x))\nforall x (Displume(x, tore) and Displume(tore, emlynne) -> Tutor(emlynne, tore))\nforall x (Displume(x, tore) -> Tutor(tore, emlynne))\nforall x (Displume(x, celine) and not Displume(celine, tore) -> not Section(tore, celine))\nforall x (Tutor(x, celine) -> Displume(celine, emlynne))\n\nnot Tutor(tore, emlynne)\n\nDisplume(celine, tore) and forall x (Displume(x, tore) -> Tutor(tore, emlynne)) -> therefore Tutor(tore, emlynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The kerrie bake the maible. The kerrie bake the carlynne. The kerrie resuspend the carlynne. The maible bake the kerrie. The maible is hunted. The maible is unenrgetic. The maible is mimic. The maible associate the carlynne. The maible resuspend the kerrie. The maible resuspend the carlynne. The carlynne bake the kerrie. The carlynne bake the maible. The carlynne is hunted. The carlynne is mimic. The carlynne associate the maible. The carlynne resuspend the maible. If the maible does not chase the carlynne then the maible associate the kerrie. If something associate the kerrie then it is unenrgetic. If something bake the kerrie and the kerrie bake the maible then the maible resuspend the kerrie. If something bake the kerrie then the kerrie resuspend the maible. If something bake the carlynne and the carlynne does not chase the kerrie then the kerrie does not see the carlynne. If something resuspend the carlynne then the carlynne bake the maible. The maible does not see the kerrie.", "logic": "\nBake(kerrie, maible)\nBake(kerrie, carlynne)\nResuspend(kerrie, carlynne)\nBake(maible, kerrie)\nHunted(maible)\nUnenrgetic(maible)\nMimic(maible)\nAssociate(maible, carlynne)\nResuspend(maible, kerrie)\nResuspend(maible, carlynne)\nBake(carlynne, kerrie)\nBake(carlynne, maible)\nHunted(carlynne)\nMimic(carlynne)\nAssociate(carlynne, maible)\nResuspend(carlynne, maible)\nnot Bake(maible, carlynne) -> Associate(maible, kerrie)\nforall x (Associate(x, kerrie) -> Unenrgetic(x))\nforall x (Bake(x, kerrie) and Bake(kerrie, maible) -> Resuspend(maible, kerrie))\nforall x (Bake(x, kerrie) -> Resuspend(kerrie, maible))\nforall x (Bake(x, carlynne) and not Bake(carlynne, kerrie) -> not Associate(kerrie, carlynne))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, carlynne) -> Bake(carlynne, maible))\n\nnot Associate(maible, kerrie)\n\nnot Bake(maible, carlynne) -> Associate(maible, kerrie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The darth incarnate the tallie. The darth incarnate the elane. The darth ingeminate the elane. The tallie incarnate the darth. The tallie is boughless. The tallie is unsullied. The tallie is expositive. The tallie revivify the elane. The tallie ingeminate the darth. The tallie ingeminate the elane. The elane incarnate the darth. The elane incarnate the tallie. The elane is boughless. The elane is expositive. The elane revivify the tallie. The elane ingeminate the tallie. If the tallie does not chase the elane then the tallie revivify the darth. If something revivify the darth then it is unsullied. If something incarnate the darth and the darth incarnate the tallie then the tallie ingeminate the darth. If something incarnate the darth then the darth ingeminate the tallie. If something incarnate the elane and the elane does not chase the darth then the darth does not see the elane. If something ingeminate the elane then the elane incarnate the tallie. The elane is unsullied.", "logic": "\nIncarnate(darth, tallie)\nIncarnate(darth, elane)\nIngeminate(darth, elane)\nIncarnate(tallie, darth)\nBoughless(tallie)\nUnsullied(tallie)\nExpositive(tallie)\nRevivify(tallie, elane)\nIngeminate(tallie, darth)\nIngeminate(tallie, elane)\nIncarnate(elane, darth)\nIncarnate(elane, tallie)\nBoughless(elane)\nExpositive(elane)\nRevivify(elane, tallie)\nIngeminate(elane, tallie)\nnot Incarnate(tallie, elane) -> Revivify(tallie, darth)\nforall x (Revivify(x, darth) -> Unsullied(x))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, darth) and Incarnate(darth, tallie) -> Ingeminate(tallie, darth))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, darth) -> Ingeminate(darth, tallie))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, elane) and not Incarnate(elane, darth) -> not Revivify(darth, elane))\nforall x (Ingeminate(x, elane) -> Incarnate(elane, tallie))\n\nUnsullied(elane)\n\nforall x (Revivify(x, darth) -> Unsullied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The estell gyrate the hatti. The estell gyrate the catharine. The estell date the catharine. The hatti gyrate the estell. The hatti is dyslexic. The hatti is sternal. The hatti is beatified. The hatti merge the catharine. The hatti date the estell. The hatti date the catharine. The catharine gyrate the estell. The catharine gyrate the hatti. The catharine is dyslexic. The catharine is beatified. The catharine merge the hatti. The catharine date the hatti. If the hatti does not chase the catharine then the hatti merge the estell. If something merge the estell then it is sternal. If something gyrate the estell and the estell gyrate the hatti then the hatti date the estell. If something gyrate the estell then the estell date the hatti. If something gyrate the catharine and the catharine does not chase the estell then the estell does not see the catharine. If something date the catharine then the catharine gyrate the hatti. The catharine does not chase the catharine.", "logic": "\nGyrate(estell, hatti)\nGyrate(estell, catharine)\nDate(estell, catharine)\nGyrate(hatti, estell)\nDyslexic(hatti)\nSternal(hatti)\nBeatified(hatti)\nMerge(hatti, catharine)\nDate(hatti, estell)\nDate(hatti, catharine)\nGyrate(catharine, estell)\nGyrate(catharine, hatti)\nDyslexic(catharine)\nBeatified(catharine)\nMerge(catharine, hatti)\nDate(catharine, hatti)\nnot Gyrate(hatti, catharine) -> Merge(hatti, estell)\nforall x (Merge(x, estell) -> Sternal(x))\nforall x (Gyrate(x, estell) and Gyrate(estell, hatti) -> Date(hatti, estell))\nforall x (Gyrate(x, estell) -> Date(estell, hatti))\nforall x (Gyrate(x, catharine) and not Gyrate(catharine, estell) -> not Merge(estell, catharine))\nforall x (Date(x, catharine) -> Gyrate(catharine, hatti))\n\nnot Gyrate(catharine, catharine)\n\nnot Gyrate(catharine, catharine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The gertrudis enthrone the myna. The gertrudis enthrone the hugh. The gertrudis muddle the hugh. The myna enthrone the gertrudis. The myna is boronic. The myna is halt. The myna is entitled. The myna phonate the hugh. The myna muddle the gertrudis. The myna muddle the hugh. The hugh enthrone the gertrudis. The hugh enthrone the myna. The hugh is boronic. The hugh is entitled. The hugh phonate the myna. The hugh muddle the myna. If the myna does not chase the hugh then the myna phonate the gertrudis. If something phonate the gertrudis then it is halt. If something enthrone the gertrudis and the gertrudis enthrone the myna then the myna muddle the gertrudis. If something enthrone the gertrudis then the gertrudis muddle the myna. If something enthrone the hugh and the hugh does not chase the gertrudis then the gertrudis does not see the hugh. If something muddle the hugh then the hugh enthrone the myna. The hugh muddle the hugh.", "logic": "\nEnthrone(gertrudis, myna)\nEnthrone(gertrudis, hugh)\nMuddle(gertrudis, hugh)\nEnthrone(myna, gertrudis)\nBoronic(myna)\nHalt(myna)\nEntitled(myna)\nPhonate(myna, hugh)\nMuddle(myna, gertrudis)\nMuddle(myna, hugh)\nEnthrone(hugh, gertrudis)\nEnthrone(hugh, myna)\nBoronic(hugh)\nEntitled(hugh)\nPhonate(hugh, myna)\nMuddle(hugh, myna)\nnot Enthrone(myna, hugh) -> Phonate(myna, gertrudis)\nforall x (Phonate(x, gertrudis) -> Halt(x))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, gertrudis) and Enthrone(gertrudis, myna) -> Muddle(myna, gertrudis))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, gertrudis) -> Muddle(gertrudis, myna))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, hugh) and not Enthrone(hugh, gertrudis) -> not Phonate(gertrudis, hugh))\nforall x (Muddle(x, hugh) -> Enthrone(hugh, myna))\n\nMuddle(hugh, hugh)\n\nMuddle(hugh, hugh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2253"} {"premises": "The stacy is hematal. The stacy is seafaring. The stacy is lumbar. The stacy is light. The stacy is endangered. If something is lumbar then it is hematal. If something is lumbar and seafaring then it is endangered. The stacy is lumbar.", "logic": "\nHematal(stacy)\nSeafaring(stacy)\nLumbar(stacy)\nLight(stacy)\nEndangered(stacy)\nforall x (Lumbar(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) and Seafaring(x) -> Endangered(x))\n\nLumbar(stacy)\n\ntherefore Lumbar(stacy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5272"} {"premises": "The shel is deserted. The shel is wearisome. The shel is figural. The shel is visualised. The shel is sore. If something is figural then it is deserted. If something is figural and wearisome then it is sore. The shel is not figural.", "logic": "\nDeserted(shel)\nWearisome(shel)\nFigural(shel)\nVisualised(shel)\nSore(shel)\nforall x (Figural(x) -> Deserted(x))\nforall x (Figural(x) and Wearisome(x) -> Sore(x))\n\nnot Figural(shel)\n\ntherefore Figural(shel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5272"} {"premises": "The danila is oldish. The danila is dicky. The danila is knockdown. The danila is sterilized. The danila is monaural. If something is knockdown then it is oldish. If something is knockdown and dicky then it is monaural. The danila does not chase the danila.", "logic": "\nOldish(danila)\nDicky(danila)\nKnockdown(danila)\nSterilized(danila)\nMonaural(danila)\nforall x (Knockdown(x) -> Oldish(x))\nforall x (Knockdown(x) and Dicky(x) -> Monaural(x))\n\nnot Chases(danila, danila)\n\nnot Chases(danila, danila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5272"} {"premises": "The piotr is calendered. The piotr is bumpy. The piotr is saprozoic. The piotr is hardcover. The piotr is chiliastic. If something is saprozoic then it is calendered. If something is saprozoic and bumpy then it is chiliastic. The piotr visits the piotr.", "logic": "\nCalendered(piotr)\nBumpy(piotr)\nSaprozoic(piotr)\nHardcover(piotr)\nChiliastic(piotr)\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) -> Calendered(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) and Bumpy(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\n\nVisits(piotr, piotr)\n\nVisits(piotr, piotr) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5272"} {"premises": "The leilah is starry. The leilah caddie the judith. The leilah court the pascale. The judith caddie the leilah. The judith caddie the pascale. The pascale is inclined. The pascale is staccato. If something is staccato then it court the judith. If the judith is conclusive then the judith calligraph the pascale. If something is staccato then it is starry. If something caddie the pascale then it caddie the leilah. If something caddie the pascale then it is starry. If the judith is starry then the judith is conclusive. The judith caddie the pascale.", "logic": "\nStarry(leilah)\nCaddie(leilah, judith)\nCourt(leilah, pascale)\nCaddie(judith, leilah)\nCaddie(judith, pascale)\nInclined(pascale)\nStaccato(pascale)\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> Court(x, judith))\nConclusive(judith) -> Calligraph(judith, pascale)\nforall x (Staccato(x) -> Starry(x))\nforall x (Caddie(x, pascale) -> Caddie(x, leilah))\nforall x (Caddie(x, pascale) -> Starry(x))\nStarry(judith) -> Conclusive(judith)\n\nCaddie(judith, pascale)\n\ntherefore Caddie(judith, pascale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The elly is coral. The elly levant the tallie. The elly taste the lorilee. The tallie levant the elly. The tallie levant the lorilee. The lorilee is uninviting. The lorilee is merry. If something is merry then it taste the tallie. If the tallie is bimestrial then the tallie bodge the lorilee. If something is merry then it is coral. If something levant the lorilee then it levant the elly. If something levant the lorilee then it is coral. If the tallie is coral then the tallie is bimestrial. The elly does not visit the lorilee.", "logic": "\nCoral(elly)\nLevant(elly, tallie)\nTaste(elly, lorilee)\nLevant(tallie, elly)\nLevant(tallie, lorilee)\nUninviting(lorilee)\nMerry(lorilee)\nforall x (Merry(x) -> Taste(x, tallie))\nBimestrial(tallie) -> Bodge(tallie, lorilee)\nforall x (Merry(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Levant(x, lorilee) -> Levant(x, elly))\nforall x (Levant(x, lorilee) -> Coral(x))\nCoral(tallie) -> Bimestrial(tallie)\n\nnot Taste(elly, lorilee)\n\ntherefore Taste(elly, lorilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The erminia is elusive. The erminia handcolour the jaynell. The erminia defat the obie. The jaynell handcolour the erminia. The jaynell handcolour the obie. The obie is impatient. The obie is frizzly. If something is frizzly then it defat the jaynell. If the jaynell is causative then the jaynell navigate the obie. If something is frizzly then it is elusive. If something handcolour the obie then it handcolour the erminia. If something handcolour the obie then it is elusive. If the jaynell is elusive then the jaynell is causative. The obie is elusive.", "logic": "\nElusive(erminia)\nHandcolour(erminia, jaynell)\nDefat(erminia, obie)\nHandcolour(jaynell, erminia)\nHandcolour(jaynell, obie)\nImpatient(obie)\nFrizzly(obie)\nforall x (Frizzly(x) -> Defat(x, jaynell))\nCausative(jaynell) -> Navigate(jaynell, obie)\nforall x (Frizzly(x) -> Elusive(x))\nforall x (Handcolour(x, obie) -> Handcolour(x, erminia))\nforall x (Handcolour(x, obie) -> Elusive(x))\nElusive(jaynell) -> Causative(jaynell)\n\nElusive(obie)\n\nFrizzly(obie) and forall x (Frizzly(x) -> Elusive(x)) -> therefore Elusive(obie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The lura is caulked. The lura galvanize the jodie. The lura topdress the duncan. The jodie galvanize the lura. The jodie galvanize the duncan. The duncan is acoustical. The duncan is formulated. If something is formulated then it topdress the jodie. If the jodie is stressful then the jodie pule the duncan. If something is formulated then it is caulked. If something galvanize the duncan then it galvanize the lura. If something galvanize the duncan then it is caulked. If the jodie is caulked then the jodie is stressful. The duncan does not visit the jodie.", "logic": "\nCaulked(lura)\nGalvanize(lura, jodie)\nTopdress(lura, duncan)\nGalvanize(jodie, lura)\nGalvanize(jodie, duncan)\nAcoustical(duncan)\nFormulated(duncan)\nforall x (Formulated(x) -> Topdress(x, jodie))\nStressful(jodie) -> Pule(jodie, duncan)\nforall x (Formulated(x) -> Caulked(x))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, duncan) -> Galvanize(x, lura))\nforall x (Galvanize(x, duncan) -> Caulked(x))\nCaulked(jodie) -> Stressful(jodie)\n\nnot Topdress(duncan, jodie)\n\nFormulated(duncan) and forall x (Formulated(x) -> Topdress(x, jodie)) -> therefore Topdress(duncan, jodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The xavier is impuissant. The xavier straddle the shanon. The xavier eternalise the phylis. The shanon straddle the xavier. The shanon straddle the phylis. The phylis is clonic. The phylis is lone. If something is lone then it eternalise the shanon. If the shanon is annulate then the shanon satisfy the phylis. If something is lone then it is impuissant. If something straddle the phylis then it straddle the xavier. If something straddle the phylis then it is impuissant. If the shanon is impuissant then the shanon is annulate. The shanon is annulate.", "logic": "\nImpuissant(xavier)\nStraddle(xavier, shanon)\nEternalise(xavier, phylis)\nStraddle(shanon, xavier)\nStraddle(shanon, phylis)\nClonic(phylis)\nLone(phylis)\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Eternalise(x, shanon))\nAnnulate(shanon) -> Satisfy(shanon, phylis)\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Straddle(x, phylis) -> Straddle(x, xavier))\nforall x (Straddle(x, phylis) -> Impuissant(x))\nImpuissant(shanon) -> Annulate(shanon)\n\nAnnulate(shanon)\n\nStraddle(shanon, phylis) and forall x (Straddle(x, phylis) -> Impuissant(x)) -> therefore Impuissant(shanon) Impuissant(shanon) and Impuissant(shanon) -> Annulate(shanon) -> therefore Annulate(shanon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The raul is allopathic. The raul stampede the jefry. The raul buffer the celinka. The jefry stampede the raul. The jefry stampede the celinka. The celinka is minoan. The celinka is darkening. If something is darkening then it buffer the jefry. If the jefry is wrongful then the jefry thrust the celinka. If something is darkening then it is allopathic. If something stampede the celinka then it stampede the raul. If something stampede the celinka then it is allopathic. If the jefry is allopathic then the jefry is wrongful. The jefry is not wrongful.", "logic": "\nAllopathic(raul)\nStampede(raul, jefry)\nBuffer(raul, celinka)\nStampede(jefry, raul)\nStampede(jefry, celinka)\nMinoan(celinka)\nDarkening(celinka)\nforall x (Darkening(x) -> Buffer(x, jefry))\nWrongful(jefry) -> Thrust(jefry, celinka)\nforall x (Darkening(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Stampede(x, celinka) -> Stampede(x, raul))\nforall x (Stampede(x, celinka) -> Allopathic(x))\nAllopathic(jefry) -> Wrongful(jefry)\n\nnot Wrongful(jefry)\n\nStampede(jefry, celinka) and forall x (Stampede(x, celinka) -> Allopathic(x)) -> therefore Allopathic(jefry) Allopathic(jefry) and Allopathic(jefry) -> Wrongful(jefry) -> therefore Wrongful(jefry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The aveline is sixteenth. The aveline guide the rochell. The aveline outcry the bryce. The rochell guide the aveline. The rochell guide the bryce. The bryce is forked. The bryce is cloddish. If something is cloddish then it outcry the rochell. If the rochell is embezzled then the rochell cavil the bryce. If something is cloddish then it is sixteenth. If something guide the bryce then it guide the aveline. If something guide the bryce then it is sixteenth. If the rochell is sixteenth then the rochell is embezzled. The rochell cavil the bryce.", "logic": "\nSixteenth(aveline)\nGuide(aveline, rochell)\nOutcry(aveline, bryce)\nGuide(rochell, aveline)\nGuide(rochell, bryce)\nForked(bryce)\nCloddish(bryce)\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> Outcry(x, rochell))\nEmbezzled(rochell) -> Cavil(rochell, bryce)\nforall x (Cloddish(x) -> Sixteenth(x))\nforall x (Guide(x, bryce) -> Guide(x, aveline))\nforall x (Guide(x, bryce) -> Sixteenth(x))\nSixteenth(rochell) -> Embezzled(rochell)\n\nCavil(rochell, bryce)\n\nGuide(rochell, bryce) and forall x (Guide(x, bryce) -> Sixteenth(x)) -> therefore Sixteenth(rochell) Sixteenth(rochell) and Sixteenth(rochell) -> Embezzled(rochell) -> therefore Embezzled(rochell) Embezzled(rochell) and Embezzled(rochell) -> Cavil(rochell, bryce) -> therefore Cavil(rochell, bryce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The damaris is evidenced. The damaris jumble the kaitlyn. The damaris decry the andi. The kaitlyn jumble the damaris. The kaitlyn jumble the andi. The andi is deepening. The andi is prefatory. If something is prefatory then it decry the kaitlyn. If the kaitlyn is tractive then the kaitlyn gormandise the andi. If something is prefatory then it is evidenced. If something jumble the andi then it jumble the damaris. If something jumble the andi then it is evidenced. If the kaitlyn is evidenced then the kaitlyn is tractive. The kaitlyn does not like the andi.", "logic": "\nEvidenced(damaris)\nJumble(damaris, kaitlyn)\nDecry(damaris, andi)\nJumble(kaitlyn, damaris)\nJumble(kaitlyn, andi)\nDeepening(andi)\nPrefatory(andi)\nforall x (Prefatory(x) -> Decry(x, kaitlyn))\nTractive(kaitlyn) -> Gormandise(kaitlyn, andi)\nforall x (Prefatory(x) -> Evidenced(x))\nforall x (Jumble(x, andi) -> Jumble(x, damaris))\nforall x (Jumble(x, andi) -> Evidenced(x))\nEvidenced(kaitlyn) -> Tractive(kaitlyn)\n\nnot Gormandise(kaitlyn, andi)\n\nJumble(kaitlyn, andi) and forall x (Jumble(x, andi) -> Evidenced(x)) -> therefore Evidenced(kaitlyn) Evidenced(kaitlyn) and Evidenced(kaitlyn) -> Tractive(kaitlyn) -> therefore Tractive(kaitlyn) Tractive(kaitlyn) and Tractive(kaitlyn) -> Gormandise(kaitlyn, andi) -> therefore Gormandise(kaitlyn, andi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The elfrieda is cuddly. The elfrieda scold the jereme. The elfrieda housebreak the brigitte. The jereme scold the elfrieda. The jereme scold the brigitte. The brigitte is puerperal. The brigitte is statewide. If something is statewide then it housebreak the jereme. If the jereme is saxicoline then the jereme obstipate the brigitte. If something is statewide then it is cuddly. If something scold the brigitte then it scold the elfrieda. If something scold the brigitte then it is cuddly. If the jereme is cuddly then the jereme is saxicoline. The brigitte does not need the elfrieda.", "logic": "\nCuddly(elfrieda)\nScold(elfrieda, jereme)\nHousebreak(elfrieda, brigitte)\nScold(jereme, elfrieda)\nScold(jereme, brigitte)\nPuerperal(brigitte)\nStatewide(brigitte)\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> Housebreak(x, jereme))\nSaxicoline(jereme) -> Obstipate(jereme, brigitte)\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> Cuddly(x))\nforall x (Scold(x, brigitte) -> Scold(x, elfrieda))\nforall x (Scold(x, brigitte) -> Cuddly(x))\nCuddly(jereme) -> Saxicoline(jereme)\n\nnot Scold(brigitte, elfrieda)\n\nforall x (Scold(x, brigitte) -> Scold(x, elfrieda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The darsie is infrequent. The darsie shrine the harrietta. The darsie hitchhike the amelita. The harrietta shrine the darsie. The harrietta shrine the amelita. The amelita is alvine. The amelita is mousey. If something is mousey then it hitchhike the harrietta. If the harrietta is parochial then the harrietta asseverate the amelita. If something is mousey then it is infrequent. If something shrine the amelita then it shrine the darsie. If something shrine the amelita then it is infrequent. If the harrietta is infrequent then the harrietta is parochial. The darsie hitchhike the harrietta.", "logic": "\nInfrequent(darsie)\nShrine(darsie, harrietta)\nHitchhike(darsie, amelita)\nShrine(harrietta, darsie)\nShrine(harrietta, amelita)\nAlvine(amelita)\nMousey(amelita)\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Hitchhike(x, harrietta))\nParochial(harrietta) -> Asseverate(harrietta, amelita)\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Infrequent(x))\nforall x (Shrine(x, amelita) -> Shrine(x, darsie))\nforall x (Shrine(x, amelita) -> Infrequent(x))\nInfrequent(harrietta) -> Parochial(harrietta)\n\nHitchhike(darsie, harrietta)\n\nforall x (Mousey(x) -> Hitchhike(x, harrietta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The lolly is oxidizable. The lolly digitize the sibella. The lolly formalise the verne. The sibella digitize the lolly. The sibella digitize the verne. The verne is racist. The verne is hollow. If something is hollow then it formalise the sibella. If the sibella is reasonless then the sibella acetylize the verne. If something is hollow then it is oxidizable. If something digitize the verne then it digitize the lolly. If something digitize the verne then it is oxidizable. If the sibella is oxidizable then the sibella is reasonless. The sibella does not visit the sibella.", "logic": "\nOxidizable(lolly)\nDigitize(lolly, sibella)\nFormalise(lolly, verne)\nDigitize(sibella, lolly)\nDigitize(sibella, verne)\nRacist(verne)\nHollow(verne)\nforall x (Hollow(x) -> Formalise(x, sibella))\nReasonless(sibella) -> Acetylize(sibella, verne)\nforall x (Hollow(x) -> Oxidizable(x))\nforall x (Digitize(x, verne) -> Digitize(x, lolly))\nforall x (Digitize(x, verne) -> Oxidizable(x))\nOxidizable(sibella) -> Reasonless(sibella)\n\nnot Formalise(sibella, sibella)\n\nforall x (Hollow(x) -> Formalise(x, sibella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The kania is gamey. The kania scollop the valera. The kania quantize the randie. The valera scollop the kania. The valera scollop the randie. The randie is sorbed. The randie is informal. If something is informal then it quantize the valera. If the valera is assured then the valera forebode the randie. If something is informal then it is gamey. If something scollop the randie then it scollop the kania. If something scollop the randie then it is gamey. If the valera is gamey then the valera is assured. The kania scollop the kania.", "logic": "\nGamey(kania)\nScollop(kania, valera)\nQuantize(kania, randie)\nScollop(valera, kania)\nScollop(valera, randie)\nSorbed(randie)\nInformal(randie)\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Quantize(x, valera))\nAssured(valera) -> Forebode(valera, randie)\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Gamey(x))\nforall x (Scollop(x, randie) -> Scollop(x, kania))\nforall x (Scollop(x, randie) -> Gamey(x))\nGamey(valera) -> Assured(valera)\n\nScollop(kania, kania)\n\nforall x (Scollop(x, randie) -> Scollop(x, kania)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The heddie is separatist. The heddie obnubilate the annabelle. The heddie chelate the danella. The annabelle obnubilate the heddie. The annabelle obnubilate the danella. The danella is centric. The danella is myelic. If something is myelic then it chelate the annabelle. If the annabelle is jolty then the annabelle fecundate the danella. If something is myelic then it is separatist. If something obnubilate the danella then it obnubilate the heddie. If something obnubilate the danella then it is separatist. If the annabelle is separatist then the annabelle is jolty. The annabelle does not visit the danella.", "logic": "\nSeparatist(heddie)\nObnubilate(heddie, annabelle)\nChelate(heddie, danella)\nObnubilate(annabelle, heddie)\nObnubilate(annabelle, danella)\nCentric(danella)\nMyelic(danella)\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Chelate(x, annabelle))\nJolty(annabelle) -> Fecundate(annabelle, danella)\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, danella) -> Obnubilate(x, heddie))\nforall x (Obnubilate(x, danella) -> Separatist(x))\nSeparatist(annabelle) -> Jolty(annabelle)\n\nnot Chelate(annabelle, danella)\n\nnot Chelate(annabelle, danella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The mareah is ahorseback. The mareah crusade the quillan. The mareah demoralise the verile. The quillan crusade the mareah. The quillan crusade the verile. The verile is acarpelous. The verile is dapper. If something is dapper then it demoralise the quillan. If the quillan is darkening then the quillan succeed the verile. If something is dapper then it is ahorseback. If something crusade the verile then it crusade the mareah. If something crusade the verile then it is ahorseback. If the quillan is ahorseback then the quillan is darkening. The mareah demoralise the mareah.", "logic": "\nAhorseback(mareah)\nCrusade(mareah, quillan)\nDemoralise(mareah, verile)\nCrusade(quillan, mareah)\nCrusade(quillan, verile)\nAcarpelous(verile)\nDapper(verile)\nforall x (Dapper(x) -> Demoralise(x, quillan))\nDarkening(quillan) -> Succeed(quillan, verile)\nforall x (Dapper(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Crusade(x, verile) -> Crusade(x, mareah))\nforall x (Crusade(x, verile) -> Ahorseback(x))\nAhorseback(quillan) -> Darkening(quillan)\n\nDemoralise(mareah, mareah)\n\nDemoralise(mareah, mareah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The george is unwilling. The george represent the angelia. The george curse the wilbert. The angelia represent the george. The angelia represent the wilbert. The wilbert is outlaw. The wilbert is adrenergic. If something is adrenergic then it curse the angelia. If the angelia is moneyed then the angelia ship the wilbert. If something is adrenergic then it is unwilling. If something represent the wilbert then it represent the george. If something represent the wilbert then it is unwilling. If the angelia is unwilling then the angelia is moneyed. The george is not big.", "logic": "\nUnwilling(george)\nRepresent(george, angelia)\nCurse(george, wilbert)\nRepresent(angelia, george)\nRepresent(angelia, wilbert)\nOutlaw(wilbert)\nAdrenergic(wilbert)\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) -> Curse(x, angelia))\nMoneyed(angelia) -> Ship(angelia, wilbert)\nforall x (Adrenergic(x) -> Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Represent(x, wilbert) -> Represent(x, george))\nforall x (Represent(x, wilbert) -> Unwilling(x))\nUnwilling(angelia) -> Moneyed(angelia)\n\nnot Big(george)\n\nnot Big(george) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The reece is spiritous. The reece burnish the olympie. The reece revitalize the geraldine. The olympie burnish the reece. The olympie burnish the geraldine. The geraldine is hydraulic. The geraldine is firm. If something is firm then it revitalize the olympie. If the olympie is trembling then the olympie recycle the geraldine. If something is firm then it is spiritous. If something burnish the geraldine then it burnish the reece. If something burnish the geraldine then it is spiritous. If the olympie is spiritous then the olympie is trembling. The geraldine recycle the olympie.", "logic": "\nSpiritous(reece)\nBurnish(reece, olympie)\nRevitalize(reece, geraldine)\nBurnish(olympie, reece)\nBurnish(olympie, geraldine)\nHydraulic(geraldine)\nFirm(geraldine)\nforall x (Firm(x) -> Revitalize(x, olympie))\nTrembling(olympie) -> Recycle(olympie, geraldine)\nforall x (Firm(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nforall x (Burnish(x, geraldine) -> Burnish(x, reece))\nforall x (Burnish(x, geraldine) -> Spiritous(x))\nSpiritous(olympie) -> Trembling(olympie)\n\nRecycle(geraldine, olympie)\n\nRecycle(geraldine, olympie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1505"} {"premises": "The hynda is not ruinous. The hynda is pontifical. The hynda is scaly. The hynda is bahraini. The hynda is blotched. If someone is scaly and not pontifical then they are ruinous. If the hynda is scaly then the hynda is blotched. If the hynda is not bahraini then the hynda is ruinous. The hynda is blotched.", "logic": "\nnot Ruinous(hynda)\nPontifical(hynda)\nScaly(hynda)\nBahraini(hynda)\nBlotched(hynda)\nforall x (Scaly(x) and not Pontifical(x) -> Ruinous(x))\nScaly(hynda) -> Blotched(hynda)\nnot Bahraini(hynda) -> Ruinous(hynda)\n\nBlotched(hynda)\n\ntherefore Blotched(hynda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "The charmaine is not downwind. The charmaine is orgiastic. The charmaine is rampageous. The charmaine is rushy. The charmaine is discordant. If someone is rampageous and not orgiastic then they are downwind. If the charmaine is rampageous then the charmaine is discordant. If the charmaine is not rushy then the charmaine is downwind. The charmaine is not rushy.", "logic": "\nnot Downwind(charmaine)\nOrgiastic(charmaine)\nRampageous(charmaine)\nRushy(charmaine)\nDiscordant(charmaine)\nforall x (Rampageous(x) and not Orgiastic(x) -> Downwind(x))\nRampageous(charmaine) -> Discordant(charmaine)\nnot Rushy(charmaine) -> Downwind(charmaine)\n\nnot Rushy(charmaine)\n\ntherefore Rushy(charmaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "The damita is not visionary. The damita is zimbabwean. The damita is laggard. The damita is outspread. The damita is associable. If someone is laggard and not zimbabwean then they are visionary. If the damita is laggard then the damita is associable. If the damita is not outspread then the damita is visionary. The damita does not eat the damita.", "logic": "\nnot Visionary(damita)\nZimbabwean(damita)\nLaggard(damita)\nOutspread(damita)\nAssociable(damita)\nforall x (Laggard(x) and not Zimbabwean(x) -> Visionary(x))\nLaggard(damita) -> Associable(damita)\nnot Outspread(damita) -> Visionary(damita)\n\nnot Eats(damita, damita)\n\nnot Eats(damita, damita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "The adrien is not unsheared. The adrien is diurnal. The adrien is populous. The adrien is twiglike. The adrien is hermitical. If someone is populous and not diurnal then they are unsheared. If the adrien is populous then the adrien is hermitical. If the adrien is not twiglike then the adrien is unsheared. The adrien visits the adrien.", "logic": "\nnot Unsheared(adrien)\nDiurnal(adrien)\nPopulous(adrien)\nTwiglike(adrien)\nHermitical(adrien)\nforall x (Populous(x) and not Diurnal(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nPopulous(adrien) -> Hermitical(adrien)\nnot Twiglike(adrien) -> Unsheared(adrien)\n\nVisits(adrien, adrien)\n\nVisits(adrien, adrien) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5950"} {"premises": "Amalle is armenian. Amalle is unsorted. Julius is noted. Julius is armenian. Julius is unsorted. Julius is slanting. Zacharia is dishonored. Zacharia is fitting. Zacharia is armenian. Zacharia is unsorted. Brittan is noted. Brittan is armenian. Red, noted people are armenian. All dishonored people are noted. If someone is armenian and sumptuary then they are noted. Furry people are sumptuary. Cold people are armenian. All armenian people are dishonored. If Julius is noted then Julius is armenian. All dishonored, noted people are unsorted. Amalle is unsorted.", "logic": "\nArmenian(amalle)\nUnsorted(amalle)\nNoted(julius)\nArmenian(julius)\nUnsorted(julius)\nSlanting(julius)\nDishonored(zacharia)\nFitting(zacharia)\nArmenian(zacharia)\nUnsorted(zacharia)\nNoted(brittan)\nArmenian(brittan)\nforall x (Sumptuary(x) and Noted(x) -> Armenian(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Noted(x))\nforall x (Armenian(x) and Sumptuary(x) -> Noted(x))\nforall x (Noted(x) -> Sumptuary(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Armenian(x))\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> Dishonored(x))\nNoted(julius) -> Armenian(julius)\nforall x (Dishonored(x) and Noted(x) -> Unsorted(x))\n\nUnsorted(amalle)\n\ntherefore Unsorted(amalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Avery is gloomy. Avery is adapted. Marlane is finicky. Marlane is gloomy. Marlane is adapted. Marlane is christian. Camala is pupal. Camala is sulfurous. Camala is gloomy. Camala is adapted. Aliza is finicky. Aliza is gloomy. Red, finicky people are gloomy. All pupal people are finicky. If someone is gloomy and dantean then they are finicky. Furry people are dantean. Cold people are gloomy. All gloomy people are pupal. If Marlane is finicky then Marlane is gloomy. All pupal, finicky people are adapted. Camala is not adapted.", "logic": "\nGloomy(avery)\nAdapted(avery)\nFinicky(marlane)\nGloomy(marlane)\nAdapted(marlane)\nChristian(marlane)\nPupal(camala)\nSulfurous(camala)\nGloomy(camala)\nAdapted(camala)\nFinicky(aliza)\nGloomy(aliza)\nforall x (Dantean(x) and Finicky(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Finicky(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) and Dantean(x) -> Finicky(x))\nforall x (Finicky(x) -> Dantean(x))\nforall x (Pupal(x) -> Gloomy(x))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> Pupal(x))\nFinicky(marlane) -> Gloomy(marlane)\nforall x (Pupal(x) and Finicky(x) -> Adapted(x))\n\nnot Adapted(camala)\n\ntherefore Adapted(camala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Lilia is vengeful. Lilia is nonnomadic. Dimitri is expert. Dimitri is vengeful. Dimitri is nonnomadic. Dimitri is hooked. Dasya is prolonged. Dasya is gaussian. Dasya is vengeful. Dasya is nonnomadic. Rakel is expert. Rakel is vengeful. Red, expert people are vengeful. All prolonged people are expert. If someone is vengeful and variant then they are expert. Furry people are variant. Cold people are vengeful. All vengeful people are prolonged. If Dimitri is expert then Dimitri is vengeful. All prolonged, expert people are nonnomadic. Rakel is variant.", "logic": "\nVengeful(lilia)\nNonnomadic(lilia)\nExpert(dimitri)\nVengeful(dimitri)\nNonnomadic(dimitri)\nHooked(dimitri)\nProlonged(dasya)\nGaussian(dasya)\nVengeful(dasya)\nNonnomadic(dasya)\nExpert(rakel)\nVengeful(rakel)\nforall x (Variant(x) and Expert(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) -> Expert(x))\nforall x (Vengeful(x) and Variant(x) -> Expert(x))\nforall x (Expert(x) -> Variant(x))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Vengeful(x) -> Prolonged(x))\nExpert(dimitri) -> Vengeful(dimitri)\nforall x (Prolonged(x) and Expert(x) -> Nonnomadic(x))\n\nVariant(rakel)\n\nExpert(rakel) and forall x (Expert(x) -> Variant(x)) -> therefore Variant(rakel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Dorothee is dermic. Dorothee is gushing. Baron is diastolic. Baron is dermic. Baron is gushing. Baron is quenchless. Donica is gravelly. Donica is allied. Donica is dermic. Donica is gushing. Eartha is diastolic. Eartha is dermic. Red, diastolic people are dermic. All gravelly people are diastolic. If someone is dermic and phonic then they are diastolic. Furry people are phonic. Cold people are dermic. All dermic people are gravelly. If Baron is diastolic then Baron is dermic. All gravelly, diastolic people are gushing. Baron is not phonic.", "logic": "\nDermic(dorothee)\nGushing(dorothee)\nDiastolic(baron)\nDermic(baron)\nGushing(baron)\nQuenchless(baron)\nGravelly(donica)\nAllied(donica)\nDermic(donica)\nGushing(donica)\nDiastolic(eartha)\nDermic(eartha)\nforall x (Phonic(x) and Diastolic(x) -> Dermic(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) and Phonic(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) -> Phonic(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Dermic(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nDiastolic(baron) -> Dermic(baron)\nforall x (Gravelly(x) and Diastolic(x) -> Gushing(x))\n\nnot Phonic(baron)\n\nDiastolic(baron) and forall x (Diastolic(x) -> Phonic(x)) -> therefore Phonic(baron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Wileen is columned. Wileen is poriferous. Sheryl is mislabeled. Sheryl is columned. Sheryl is poriferous. Sheryl is fouled. Electra is ageless. Electra is unheaded. Electra is columned. Electra is poriferous. Jelene is mislabeled. Jelene is columned. Red, mislabeled people are columned. All ageless people are mislabeled. If someone is columned and baptised then they are mislabeled. Furry people are baptised. Cold people are columned. All columned people are ageless. If Sheryl is mislabeled then Sheryl is columned. All ageless, mislabeled people are poriferous. Jelene is poriferous.", "logic": "\nColumned(wileen)\nPoriferous(wileen)\nMislabeled(sheryl)\nColumned(sheryl)\nPoriferous(sheryl)\nFouled(sheryl)\nAgeless(electra)\nUnheaded(electra)\nColumned(electra)\nPoriferous(electra)\nMislabeled(jelene)\nColumned(jelene)\nforall x (Baptised(x) and Mislabeled(x) -> Columned(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\nforall x (Columned(x) and Baptised(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Baptised(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Columned(x))\nforall x (Columned(x) -> Ageless(x))\nMislabeled(sheryl) -> Columned(sheryl)\nforall x (Ageless(x) and Mislabeled(x) -> Poriferous(x))\n\nPoriferous(jelene)\n\nColumned(jelene) and forall x (Columned(x) -> Ageless(x)) -> therefore Ageless(jelene) Ageless(jelene) and Mislabeled(jelene) and forall x (Ageless(x) and Mislabeled(x) -> Poriferous(x)) -> therefore Poriferous(jelene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Lyssa is fattish. Lyssa is virulent. Mathias is monegasque. Mathias is fattish. Mathias is virulent. Mathias is scabrous. Aldus is scrubby. Aldus is local. Aldus is fattish. Aldus is virulent. Allie is monegasque. Allie is fattish. Red, monegasque people are fattish. All scrubby people are monegasque. If someone is fattish and betrothed then they are monegasque. Furry people are betrothed. Cold people are fattish. All fattish people are scrubby. If Mathias is monegasque then Mathias is fattish. All scrubby, monegasque people are virulent. Allie is not virulent.", "logic": "\nFattish(lyssa)\nVirulent(lyssa)\nMonegasque(mathias)\nFattish(mathias)\nVirulent(mathias)\nScabrous(mathias)\nScrubby(aldus)\nLocal(aldus)\nFattish(aldus)\nVirulent(aldus)\nMonegasque(allie)\nFattish(allie)\nforall x (Betrothed(x) and Monegasque(x) -> Fattish(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nforall x (Fattish(x) and Betrothed(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nforall x (Monegasque(x) -> Betrothed(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Fattish(x))\nforall x (Fattish(x) -> Scrubby(x))\nMonegasque(mathias) -> Fattish(mathias)\nforall x (Scrubby(x) and Monegasque(x) -> Virulent(x))\n\nnot Virulent(allie)\n\nFattish(allie) and forall x (Fattish(x) -> Scrubby(x)) -> therefore Scrubby(allie) Scrubby(allie) and Monegasque(allie) and forall x (Scrubby(x) and Monegasque(x) -> Virulent(x)) -> therefore Virulent(allie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Skyler is impassive. Skyler is tripartite. Mervin is coenobitic. Mervin is impassive. Mervin is tripartite. Mervin is sour. Cassandra is acaudal. Cassandra is dustlike. Cassandra is impassive. Cassandra is tripartite. Kay is coenobitic. Kay is impassive. Red, coenobitic people are impassive. All acaudal people are coenobitic. If someone is impassive and iterative then they are coenobitic. Furry people are iterative. Cold people are impassive. All impassive people are acaudal. If Mervin is coenobitic then Mervin is impassive. All acaudal, coenobitic people are tripartite. Skyler is iterative.", "logic": "\nImpassive(skyler)\nTripartite(skyler)\nCoenobitic(mervin)\nImpassive(mervin)\nTripartite(mervin)\nSour(mervin)\nAcaudal(cassandra)\nDustlike(cassandra)\nImpassive(cassandra)\nTripartite(cassandra)\nCoenobitic(kay)\nImpassive(kay)\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Coenobitic(x) -> Impassive(x))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nforall x (Impassive(x) and Iterative(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Iterative(x))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) -> Impassive(x))\nforall x (Impassive(x) -> Acaudal(x))\nCoenobitic(mervin) -> Impassive(mervin)\nforall x (Acaudal(x) and Coenobitic(x) -> Tripartite(x))\n\nIterative(skyler)\n\nImpassive(skyler) and forall x (Impassive(x) -> Acaudal(x)) -> therefore Acaudal(skyler) Acaudal(skyler) and forall x (Acaudal(x) -> Coenobitic(x)) -> therefore Coenobitic(skyler) Coenobitic(skyler) and forall x (Coenobitic(x) -> Iterative(x)) -> therefore Iterative(skyler)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Kristy is littoral. Kristy is junior. Elliott is fourth. Elliott is littoral. Elliott is junior. Elliott is mitral. Danit is alvine. Danit is parthian. Danit is littoral. Danit is junior. Alli is fourth. Alli is littoral. Red, fourth people are littoral. All alvine people are fourth. If someone is littoral and falciform then they are fourth. Furry people are falciform. Cold people are littoral. All littoral people are alvine. If Elliott is fourth then Elliott is littoral. All alvine, fourth people are junior. Kristy is not falciform.", "logic": "\nLittoral(kristy)\nJunior(kristy)\nFourth(elliott)\nLittoral(elliott)\nJunior(elliott)\nMitral(elliott)\nAlvine(danit)\nParthian(danit)\nLittoral(danit)\nJunior(danit)\nFourth(alli)\nLittoral(alli)\nforall x (Falciform(x) and Fourth(x) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Fourth(x))\nforall x (Littoral(x) and Falciform(x) -> Fourth(x))\nforall x (Fourth(x) -> Falciform(x))\nforall x (Alvine(x) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Littoral(x) -> Alvine(x))\nFourth(elliott) -> Littoral(elliott)\nforall x (Alvine(x) and Fourth(x) -> Junior(x))\n\nnot Falciform(kristy)\n\nLittoral(kristy) and forall x (Littoral(x) -> Alvine(x)) -> therefore Alvine(kristy) Alvine(kristy) and forall x (Alvine(x) -> Fourth(x)) -> therefore Fourth(kristy) Fourth(kristy) and forall x (Fourth(x) -> Falciform(x)) -> therefore Falciform(kristy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Iris is oscitant. Iris is corrupted. Noel is stunned. Noel is oscitant. Noel is corrupted. Noel is mucoidal. Zackariah is shitless. Zackariah is chance. Zackariah is oscitant. Zackariah is corrupted. Skylar is stunned. Skylar is oscitant. Red, stunned people are oscitant. All shitless people are stunned. If someone is oscitant and inadequate then they are stunned. Furry people are inadequate. Cold people are oscitant. All oscitant people are shitless. If Noel is stunned then Noel is oscitant. All shitless, stunned people are corrupted. Noel is not chance.", "logic": "\nOscitant(iris)\nCorrupted(iris)\nStunned(noel)\nOscitant(noel)\nCorrupted(noel)\nMucoidal(noel)\nShitless(zackariah)\nChance(zackariah)\nOscitant(zackariah)\nCorrupted(zackariah)\nStunned(skylar)\nOscitant(skylar)\nforall x (Inadequate(x) and Stunned(x) -> Oscitant(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Stunned(x))\nforall x (Oscitant(x) and Inadequate(x) -> Stunned(x))\nforall x (Stunned(x) -> Inadequate(x))\nforall x (Shitless(x) -> Oscitant(x))\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Shitless(x))\nStunned(noel) -> Oscitant(noel)\nforall x (Shitless(x) and Stunned(x) -> Corrupted(x))\n\nnot Chance(noel)\n\nnot Chance(noel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Austina is bedded. Austina is jagged. Petr is suspensive. Petr is bedded. Petr is jagged. Petr is shipboard. Siward is unplaced. Siward is amendatory. Siward is bedded. Siward is jagged. Starlin is suspensive. Starlin is bedded. Red, suspensive people are bedded. All unplaced people are suspensive. If someone is bedded and remorseful then they are suspensive. Furry people are remorseful. Cold people are bedded. All bedded people are unplaced. If Petr is suspensive then Petr is bedded. All unplaced, suspensive people are jagged. Starlin is amendatory.", "logic": "\nBedded(austina)\nJagged(austina)\nSuspensive(petr)\nBedded(petr)\nJagged(petr)\nShipboard(petr)\nUnplaced(siward)\nAmendatory(siward)\nBedded(siward)\nJagged(siward)\nSuspensive(starlin)\nBedded(starlin)\nforall x (Remorseful(x) and Suspensive(x) -> Bedded(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Suspensive(x))\nforall x (Bedded(x) and Remorseful(x) -> Suspensive(x))\nforall x (Suspensive(x) -> Remorseful(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Bedded(x))\nforall x (Bedded(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nSuspensive(petr) -> Bedded(petr)\nforall x (Unplaced(x) and Suspensive(x) -> Jagged(x))\n\nAmendatory(starlin)\n\nAmendatory(starlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Eden is archaean. Eden is fatheaded. Carmen is regimented. Carmen is archaean. Carmen is fatheaded. Carmen is embryonal. Neila is vertical. Neila is muslim. Neila is archaean. Neila is fatheaded. Rosalinde is regimented. Rosalinde is archaean. Red, regimented people are archaean. All vertical people are regimented. If someone is archaean and unsatiated then they are regimented. Furry people are unsatiated. Cold people are archaean. All archaean people are vertical. If Carmen is regimented then Carmen is archaean. All vertical, regimented people are fatheaded. Rosalinde is not embryonal.", "logic": "\nArchaean(eden)\nFatheaded(eden)\nRegimented(carmen)\nArchaean(carmen)\nFatheaded(carmen)\nEmbryonal(carmen)\nVertical(neila)\nMuslim(neila)\nArchaean(neila)\nFatheaded(neila)\nRegimented(rosalinde)\nArchaean(rosalinde)\nforall x (Unsatiated(x) and Regimented(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Regimented(x))\nforall x (Archaean(x) and Unsatiated(x) -> Regimented(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Unsatiated(x))\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Archaean(x))\nforall x (Archaean(x) -> Vertical(x))\nRegimented(carmen) -> Archaean(carmen)\nforall x (Vertical(x) and Regimented(x) -> Fatheaded(x))\n\nnot Embryonal(rosalinde)\n\nnot Embryonal(rosalinde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Amadeus is accentual. Amadeus is marred. Louise is union. Louise is accentual. Louise is marred. Louise is instant. Heddi is mourning. Heddi is prefaded. Heddi is accentual. Heddi is marred. Patric is union. Patric is accentual. Red, union people are accentual. All mourning people are union. If someone is accentual and isotropous then they are union. Furry people are isotropous. Cold people are accentual. All accentual people are mourning. If Louise is union then Louise is accentual. All mourning, union people are marred. Heddi is instant.", "logic": "\nAccentual(amadeus)\nMarred(amadeus)\nUnion(louise)\nAccentual(louise)\nMarred(louise)\nInstant(louise)\nMourning(heddi)\nPrefaded(heddi)\nAccentual(heddi)\nMarred(heddi)\nUnion(patric)\nAccentual(patric)\nforall x (Isotropous(x) and Union(x) -> Accentual(x))\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Union(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) and Isotropous(x) -> Union(x))\nforall x (Union(x) -> Isotropous(x))\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Accentual(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) -> Mourning(x))\nUnion(louise) -> Accentual(louise)\nforall x (Mourning(x) and Union(x) -> Marred(x))\n\nInstant(heddi)\n\nInstant(heddi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Lia is mediatory. Lia is momentous. Olva is feigned. Olva is mediatory. Olva is momentous. Olva is poised. Alisha is peroneal. Alisha is flagitious. Alisha is mediatory. Alisha is momentous. Janessa is feigned. Janessa is mediatory. Red, feigned people are mediatory. All peroneal people are feigned. If someone is mediatory and plaguy then they are feigned. Furry people are plaguy. Cold people are mediatory. All mediatory people are peroneal. If Olva is feigned then Olva is mediatory. All peroneal, feigned people are momentous. Lia is not poised.", "logic": "\nMediatory(lia)\nMomentous(lia)\nFeigned(olva)\nMediatory(olva)\nMomentous(olva)\nPoised(olva)\nPeroneal(alisha)\nFlagitious(alisha)\nMediatory(alisha)\nMomentous(alisha)\nFeigned(janessa)\nMediatory(janessa)\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and Feigned(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nforall x (Peroneal(x) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) and Plaguy(x) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Feigned(x) -> Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Peroneal(x) -> Mediatory(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Peroneal(x))\nFeigned(olva) -> Mediatory(olva)\nforall x (Peroneal(x) and Feigned(x) -> Momentous(x))\n\nnot Poised(lia)\n\nnot Poised(lia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "Jayne is nonrigid. Jayne is mired. Charmian is trancelike. Charmian is nonrigid. Charmian is mired. Charmian is unalike. Vicky is aweary. Vicky is unchecked. Vicky is nonrigid. Vicky is mired. Francesco is trancelike. Francesco is nonrigid. Red, trancelike people are nonrigid. All aweary people are trancelike. If someone is nonrigid and unversed then they are trancelike. Furry people are unversed. Cold people are nonrigid. All nonrigid people are aweary. If Charmian is trancelike then Charmian is nonrigid. All aweary, trancelike people are mired. Jayne is unchecked.", "logic": "\nNonrigid(jayne)\nMired(jayne)\nTrancelike(charmian)\nNonrigid(charmian)\nMired(charmian)\nUnalike(charmian)\nAweary(vicky)\nUnchecked(vicky)\nNonrigid(vicky)\nMired(vicky)\nTrancelike(francesco)\nNonrigid(francesco)\nforall x (Unversed(x) and Trancelike(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\nforall x (Aweary(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) and Unversed(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nforall x (Trancelike(x) -> Unversed(x))\nforall x (Aweary(x) -> Nonrigid(x))\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) -> Aweary(x))\nTrancelike(charmian) -> Nonrigid(charmian)\nforall x (Aweary(x) and Trancelike(x) -> Mired(x))\n\nUnchecked(jayne)\n\nUnchecked(jayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1003"} {"premises": "The giancarlo rankle the upton. The giancarlo rankle the remus. The giancarlo unknot the upton. The giancarlo is skew. The upton rankle the giancarlo. The upton is skew. The upton lift the giancarlo. The upton lift the remus. The upton lift the louella. The remus rankle the giancarlo. The remus rankle the louella. The remus is encrusted. The remus lift the giancarlo. The louella rankle the giancarlo. The louella rankle the remus. The louella is ample. If something unknot the giancarlo then the giancarlo rankle the remus. All fearful things are encrusted. If the louella unknot the upton then the upton unknot the remus. If something is encrusted then it unknot the giancarlo. If something rankle the upton and it lift the remus then the remus is skew. If something rankle the giancarlo and it is skew then it rankle the upton. If something lift the upton then it is dominated. All encrusted, ample things are dominated. The remus rankle the giancarlo.", "logic": "\nRankle(giancarlo, upton)\nRankle(giancarlo, remus)\nUnknot(giancarlo, upton)\nSkew(giancarlo)\nRankle(upton, giancarlo)\nSkew(upton)\nLift(upton, giancarlo)\nLift(upton, remus)\nLift(upton, louella)\nRankle(remus, giancarlo)\nRankle(remus, louella)\nEncrusted(remus)\nLift(remus, giancarlo)\nRankle(louella, giancarlo)\nRankle(louella, remus)\nAmple(louella)\nforall x (Unknot(x, giancarlo) -> Rankle(giancarlo, remus))\nforall x (Fearful(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nUnknot(louella, upton) -> Unknot(upton, remus)\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> Unknot(x, giancarlo))\nforall x (Rankle(x, upton) and Lift(x, remus) -> Skew(remus))\nforall x (Rankle(x, giancarlo) and Skew(x) -> Rankle(x, upton))\nforall x (Lift(x, upton) -> Dominated(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and Ample(x) -> Dominated(x))\n\nRankle(remus, giancarlo)\n\ntherefore Rankle(remus, giancarlo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The fredelia dampen the arlena. The fredelia dampen the patrica. The fredelia shellack the arlena. The fredelia is solitary. The arlena dampen the fredelia. The arlena is solitary. The arlena company the fredelia. The arlena company the patrica. The arlena company the gerti. The patrica dampen the fredelia. The patrica dampen the gerti. The patrica is arching. The patrica company the fredelia. The gerti dampen the fredelia. The gerti dampen the patrica. The gerti is apophatic. If something shellack the fredelia then the fredelia dampen the patrica. All extempore things are arching. If the gerti shellack the arlena then the arlena shellack the patrica. If something is arching then it shellack the fredelia. If something dampen the arlena and it company the patrica then the patrica is solitary. If something dampen the fredelia and it is solitary then it dampen the arlena. If something company the arlena then it is lobated. All arching, apophatic things are lobated. The arlena does not like the fredelia.", "logic": "\nDampen(fredelia, arlena)\nDampen(fredelia, patrica)\nShellack(fredelia, arlena)\nSolitary(fredelia)\nDampen(arlena, fredelia)\nSolitary(arlena)\nCompany(arlena, fredelia)\nCompany(arlena, patrica)\nCompany(arlena, gerti)\nDampen(patrica, fredelia)\nDampen(patrica, gerti)\nArching(patrica)\nCompany(patrica, fredelia)\nDampen(gerti, fredelia)\nDampen(gerti, patrica)\nApophatic(gerti)\nforall x (Shellack(x, fredelia) -> Dampen(fredelia, patrica))\nforall x (Extempore(x) -> Arching(x))\nShellack(gerti, arlena) -> Shellack(arlena, patrica)\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Shellack(x, fredelia))\nforall x (Dampen(x, arlena) and Company(x, patrica) -> Solitary(patrica))\nforall x (Dampen(x, fredelia) and Solitary(x) -> Dampen(x, arlena))\nforall x (Company(x, arlena) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) and Apophatic(x) -> Lobated(x))\n\nnot Company(arlena, fredelia)\n\ntherefore Company(arlena, fredelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The silvan survive the alley. The silvan survive the desmond. The silvan neighbour the alley. The silvan is biologic. The alley survive the silvan. The alley is biologic. The alley fume the silvan. The alley fume the desmond. The alley fume the josey. The desmond survive the silvan. The desmond survive the josey. The desmond is amatory. The desmond fume the silvan. The josey survive the silvan. The josey survive the desmond. The josey is bracing. If something neighbour the silvan then the silvan survive the desmond. All discreet things are amatory. If the josey neighbour the alley then the alley neighbour the desmond. If something is amatory then it neighbour the silvan. If something survive the alley and it fume the desmond then the desmond is biologic. If something survive the silvan and it is biologic then it survive the alley. If something fume the alley then it is censored. All amatory, bracing things are censored. The alley survive the alley.", "logic": "\nSurvive(silvan, alley)\nSurvive(silvan, desmond)\nNeighbour(silvan, alley)\nBiologic(silvan)\nSurvive(alley, silvan)\nBiologic(alley)\nFume(alley, silvan)\nFume(alley, desmond)\nFume(alley, josey)\nSurvive(desmond, silvan)\nSurvive(desmond, josey)\nAmatory(desmond)\nFume(desmond, silvan)\nSurvive(josey, silvan)\nSurvive(josey, desmond)\nBracing(josey)\nforall x (Neighbour(x, silvan) -> Survive(silvan, desmond))\nforall x (Discreet(x) -> Amatory(x))\nNeighbour(josey, alley) -> Neighbour(alley, desmond)\nforall x (Amatory(x) -> Neighbour(x, silvan))\nforall x (Survive(x, alley) and Fume(x, desmond) -> Biologic(desmond))\nforall x (Survive(x, silvan) and Biologic(x) -> Survive(x, alley))\nforall x (Fume(x, alley) -> Censored(x))\nforall x (Amatory(x) and Bracing(x) -> Censored(x))\n\nSurvive(alley, alley)\n\nSurvive(alley, silvan) and Biologic(alley) and forall x (Survive(x, silvan) and Biologic(x) -> Survive(x, alley)) -> therefore Survive(alley, alley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The kate smelt the lorne. The kate smelt the lyndy. The kate inebriate the lorne. The kate is hilly. The lorne smelt the kate. The lorne is hilly. The lorne cakewalk the kate. The lorne cakewalk the lyndy. The lorne cakewalk the nerissa. The lyndy smelt the kate. The lyndy smelt the nerissa. The lyndy is bucolic. The lyndy cakewalk the kate. The nerissa smelt the kate. The nerissa smelt the lyndy. The nerissa is releasing. If something inebriate the kate then the kate smelt the lyndy. All unlettered things are bucolic. If the nerissa inebriate the lorne then the lorne inebriate the lyndy. If something is bucolic then it inebriate the kate. If something smelt the lorne and it cakewalk the lyndy then the lyndy is hilly. If something smelt the kate and it is hilly then it smelt the lorne. If something cakewalk the lorne then it is acetous. All bucolic, releasing things are acetous. The lorne does not chase the lorne.", "logic": "\nSmelt(kate, lorne)\nSmelt(kate, lyndy)\nInebriate(kate, lorne)\nHilly(kate)\nSmelt(lorne, kate)\nHilly(lorne)\nCakewalk(lorne, kate)\nCakewalk(lorne, lyndy)\nCakewalk(lorne, nerissa)\nSmelt(lyndy, kate)\nSmelt(lyndy, nerissa)\nBucolic(lyndy)\nCakewalk(lyndy, kate)\nSmelt(nerissa, kate)\nSmelt(nerissa, lyndy)\nReleasing(nerissa)\nforall x (Inebriate(x, kate) -> Smelt(kate, lyndy))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) -> Bucolic(x))\nInebriate(nerissa, lorne) -> Inebriate(lorne, lyndy)\nforall x (Bucolic(x) -> Inebriate(x, kate))\nforall x (Smelt(x, lorne) and Cakewalk(x, lyndy) -> Hilly(lyndy))\nforall x (Smelt(x, kate) and Hilly(x) -> Smelt(x, lorne))\nforall x (Cakewalk(x, lorne) -> Acetous(x))\nforall x (Bucolic(x) and Releasing(x) -> Acetous(x))\n\nnot Smelt(lorne, lorne)\n\nSmelt(lorne, kate) and Hilly(lorne) and forall x (Smelt(x, kate) and Hilly(x) -> Smelt(x, lorne)) -> therefore Smelt(lorne, lorne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The courtenay shellack the wells. The courtenay shellack the dore. The courtenay disaccord the wells. The courtenay is utilized. The wells shellack the courtenay. The wells is utilized. The wells overtire the courtenay. The wells overtire the dore. The wells overtire the gerladina. The dore shellack the courtenay. The dore shellack the gerladina. The dore is coquettish. The dore overtire the courtenay. The gerladina shellack the courtenay. The gerladina shellack the dore. The gerladina is marginal. If something disaccord the courtenay then the courtenay shellack the dore. All azure things are coquettish. If the gerladina disaccord the wells then the wells disaccord the dore. If something is coquettish then it disaccord the courtenay. If something shellack the wells and it overtire the dore then the dore is utilized. If something shellack the courtenay and it is utilized then it shellack the wells. If something overtire the wells then it is bonny. All coquettish, marginal things are bonny. The dore is utilized.", "logic": "\nShellack(courtenay, wells)\nShellack(courtenay, dore)\nDisaccord(courtenay, wells)\nUtilized(courtenay)\nShellack(wells, courtenay)\nUtilized(wells)\nOvertire(wells, courtenay)\nOvertire(wells, dore)\nOvertire(wells, gerladina)\nShellack(dore, courtenay)\nShellack(dore, gerladina)\nCoquettish(dore)\nOvertire(dore, courtenay)\nShellack(gerladina, courtenay)\nShellack(gerladina, dore)\nMarginal(gerladina)\nforall x (Disaccord(x, courtenay) -> Shellack(courtenay, dore))\nforall x (Azure(x) -> Coquettish(x))\nDisaccord(gerladina, wells) -> Disaccord(wells, dore)\nforall x (Coquettish(x) -> Disaccord(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Shellack(x, wells) and Overtire(x, dore) -> Utilized(dore))\nforall x (Shellack(x, courtenay) and Utilized(x) -> Shellack(x, wells))\nforall x (Overtire(x, wells) -> Bonny(x))\nforall x (Coquettish(x) and Marginal(x) -> Bonny(x))\n\nUtilized(dore)\n\nShellack(wells, courtenay) and Utilized(wells) and forall x (Shellack(x, courtenay) and Utilized(x) -> Shellack(x, wells)) -> therefore Shellack(wells, wells) Shellack(wells, wells) and Overtire(wells, dore) and forall x (Shellack(x, wells) and Overtire(x, dore) -> Utilized(dore)) -> therefore Utilized(dore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The izaak piggyback the esteban. The izaak piggyback the adolf. The izaak plash the esteban. The izaak is clxx. The esteban piggyback the izaak. The esteban is clxx. The esteban baptize the izaak. The esteban baptize the adolf. The esteban baptize the kelcie. The adolf piggyback the izaak. The adolf piggyback the kelcie. The adolf is healed. The adolf baptize the izaak. The kelcie piggyback the izaak. The kelcie piggyback the adolf. The kelcie is echoic. If something plash the izaak then the izaak piggyback the adolf. All mozartian things are healed. If the kelcie plash the esteban then the esteban plash the adolf. If something is healed then it plash the izaak. If something piggyback the esteban and it baptize the adolf then the adolf is clxx. If something piggyback the izaak and it is clxx then it piggyback the esteban. If something baptize the esteban then it is cxxx. All healed, echoic things are cxxx. The adolf is not clxx.", "logic": "\nPiggyback(izaak, esteban)\nPiggyback(izaak, adolf)\nPlash(izaak, esteban)\nClxx(izaak)\nPiggyback(esteban, izaak)\nClxx(esteban)\nBaptize(esteban, izaak)\nBaptize(esteban, adolf)\nBaptize(esteban, kelcie)\nPiggyback(adolf, izaak)\nPiggyback(adolf, kelcie)\nHealed(adolf)\nBaptize(adolf, izaak)\nPiggyback(kelcie, izaak)\nPiggyback(kelcie, adolf)\nEchoic(kelcie)\nforall x (Plash(x, izaak) -> Piggyback(izaak, adolf))\nforall x (Mozartian(x) -> Healed(x))\nPlash(kelcie, esteban) -> Plash(esteban, adolf)\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Plash(x, izaak))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, esteban) and Baptize(x, adolf) -> Clxx(adolf))\nforall x (Piggyback(x, izaak) and Clxx(x) -> Piggyback(x, esteban))\nforall x (Baptize(x, esteban) -> Cxxx(x))\nforall x (Healed(x) and Echoic(x) -> Cxxx(x))\n\nnot Clxx(adolf)\n\nPiggyback(esteban, izaak) and Clxx(esteban) and forall x (Piggyback(x, izaak) and Clxx(x) -> Piggyback(x, esteban)) -> therefore Piggyback(esteban, esteban) Piggyback(esteban, esteban) and Baptize(esteban, adolf) and forall x (Piggyback(x, esteban) and Baptize(x, adolf) -> Clxx(adolf)) -> therefore Clxx(adolf)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The josefina muse the torrance. The josefina muse the noami. The josefina vermilion the torrance. The josefina is biaxate. The torrance muse the josefina. The torrance is biaxate. The torrance establish the josefina. The torrance establish the noami. The torrance establish the iggie. The noami muse the josefina. The noami muse the iggie. The noami is appetising. The noami establish the josefina. The iggie muse the josefina. The iggie muse the noami. The iggie is painful. If something vermilion the josefina then the josefina muse the noami. All chance things are appetising. If the iggie vermilion the torrance then the torrance vermilion the noami. If something is appetising then it vermilion the josefina. If something muse the torrance and it establish the noami then the noami is biaxate. If something muse the josefina and it is biaxate then it muse the torrance. If something establish the torrance then it is obnoxious. All appetising, painful things are obnoxious. The noami muse the torrance.", "logic": "\nMuse(josefina, torrance)\nMuse(josefina, noami)\nVermilion(josefina, torrance)\nBiaxate(josefina)\nMuse(torrance, josefina)\nBiaxate(torrance)\nEstablish(torrance, josefina)\nEstablish(torrance, noami)\nEstablish(torrance, iggie)\nMuse(noami, josefina)\nMuse(noami, iggie)\nAppetising(noami)\nEstablish(noami, josefina)\nMuse(iggie, josefina)\nMuse(iggie, noami)\nPainful(iggie)\nforall x (Vermilion(x, josefina) -> Muse(josefina, noami))\nforall x (Chance(x) -> Appetising(x))\nVermilion(iggie, torrance) -> Vermilion(torrance, noami)\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Vermilion(x, josefina))\nforall x (Muse(x, torrance) and Establish(x, noami) -> Biaxate(noami))\nforall x (Muse(x, josefina) and Biaxate(x) -> Muse(x, torrance))\nforall x (Establish(x, torrance) -> Obnoxious(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) and Painful(x) -> Obnoxious(x))\n\nMuse(noami, torrance)\n\nMuse(torrance, josefina) and Biaxate(torrance) and forall x (Muse(x, josefina) and Biaxate(x) -> Muse(x, torrance)) -> therefore Muse(torrance, torrance) Muse(torrance, torrance) and Establish(torrance, noami) and forall x (Muse(x, torrance) and Establish(x, noami) -> Biaxate(noami)) -> therefore Biaxate(noami) Muse(noami, josefina) and Biaxate(noami) and forall x (Muse(x, josefina) and Biaxate(x) -> Muse(x, torrance)) -> therefore Muse(noami, torrance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The ariel wriggle the tully. The ariel wriggle the davina. The ariel source the tully. The ariel is esurient. The tully wriggle the ariel. The tully is esurient. The tully animalize the ariel. The tully animalize the davina. The tully animalize the rozanna. The davina wriggle the ariel. The davina wriggle the rozanna. The davina is synoicous. The davina animalize the ariel. The rozanna wriggle the ariel. The rozanna wriggle the davina. The rozanna is thumbed. If something source the ariel then the ariel wriggle the davina. All geophytic things are synoicous. If the rozanna source the tully then the tully source the davina. If something is synoicous then it source the ariel. If something wriggle the tully and it animalize the davina then the davina is esurient. If something wriggle the ariel and it is esurient then it wriggle the tully. If something animalize the tully then it is monolithic. All synoicous, thumbed things are monolithic. The davina does not chase the tully.", "logic": "\nWriggle(ariel, tully)\nWriggle(ariel, davina)\nSource(ariel, tully)\nEsurient(ariel)\nWriggle(tully, ariel)\nEsurient(tully)\nAnimalize(tully, ariel)\nAnimalize(tully, davina)\nAnimalize(tully, rozanna)\nWriggle(davina, ariel)\nWriggle(davina, rozanna)\nSynoicous(davina)\nAnimalize(davina, ariel)\nWriggle(rozanna, ariel)\nWriggle(rozanna, davina)\nThumbed(rozanna)\nforall x (Source(x, ariel) -> Wriggle(ariel, davina))\nforall x (Geophytic(x) -> Synoicous(x))\nSource(rozanna, tully) -> Source(tully, davina)\nforall x (Synoicous(x) -> Source(x, ariel))\nforall x (Wriggle(x, tully) and Animalize(x, davina) -> Esurient(davina))\nforall x (Wriggle(x, ariel) and Esurient(x) -> Wriggle(x, tully))\nforall x (Animalize(x, tully) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Synoicous(x) and Thumbed(x) -> Monolithic(x))\n\nnot Wriggle(davina, tully)\n\nWriggle(tully, ariel) and Esurient(tully) and forall x (Wriggle(x, ariel) and Esurient(x) -> Wriggle(x, tully)) -> therefore Wriggle(tully, tully) Wriggle(tully, tully) and Animalize(tully, davina) and forall x (Wriggle(x, tully) and Animalize(x, davina) -> Esurient(davina)) -> therefore Esurient(davina) Wriggle(davina, ariel) and Esurient(davina) and forall x (Wriggle(x, ariel) and Esurient(x) -> Wriggle(x, tully)) -> therefore Wriggle(davina, tully)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The sander permeate the sinclare. The sander permeate the debby. The sander crystalise the sinclare. The sander is phyletic. The sinclare permeate the sander. The sinclare is phyletic. The sinclare cater the sander. The sinclare cater the debby. The sinclare cater the tedman. The debby permeate the sander. The debby permeate the tedman. The debby is auricular. The debby cater the sander. The tedman permeate the sander. The tedman permeate the debby. The tedman is arthritic. If something crystalise the sander then the sander permeate the debby. All scurvy things are auricular. If the tedman crystalise the sinclare then the sinclare crystalise the debby. If something is auricular then it crystalise the sander. If something permeate the sinclare and it cater the debby then the debby is phyletic. If something permeate the sander and it is phyletic then it permeate the sinclare. If something cater the sinclare then it is iron. All auricular, arthritic things are iron. The sander is not iron.", "logic": "\nPermeate(sander, sinclare)\nPermeate(sander, debby)\nCrystalise(sander, sinclare)\nPhyletic(sander)\nPermeate(sinclare, sander)\nPhyletic(sinclare)\nCater(sinclare, sander)\nCater(sinclare, debby)\nCater(sinclare, tedman)\nPermeate(debby, sander)\nPermeate(debby, tedman)\nAuricular(debby)\nCater(debby, sander)\nPermeate(tedman, sander)\nPermeate(tedman, debby)\nArthritic(tedman)\nforall x (Crystalise(x, sander) -> Permeate(sander, debby))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) -> Auricular(x))\nCrystalise(tedman, sinclare) -> Crystalise(sinclare, debby)\nforall x (Auricular(x) -> Crystalise(x, sander))\nforall x (Permeate(x, sinclare) and Cater(x, debby) -> Phyletic(debby))\nforall x (Permeate(x, sander) and Phyletic(x) -> Permeate(x, sinclare))\nforall x (Cater(x, sinclare) -> Iron(x))\nforall x (Auricular(x) and Arthritic(x) -> Iron(x))\n\nnot Iron(sander)\n\nforall x (Cater(x, sinclare) -> Iron(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The madelina separate the tremain. The madelina separate the marylee. The madelina unclasp the tremain. The madelina is stern. The tremain separate the madelina. The tremain is stern. The tremain blotch the madelina. The tremain blotch the marylee. The tremain blotch the immanuel. The marylee separate the madelina. The marylee separate the immanuel. The marylee is benzylic. The marylee blotch the madelina. The immanuel separate the madelina. The immanuel separate the marylee. The immanuel is porous. If something unclasp the madelina then the madelina separate the marylee. All votive things are benzylic. If the immanuel unclasp the tremain then the tremain unclasp the marylee. If something is benzylic then it unclasp the madelina. If something separate the tremain and it blotch the marylee then the marylee is stern. If something separate the madelina and it is stern then it separate the tremain. If something blotch the tremain then it is unlabelled. All benzylic, porous things are unlabelled. The immanuel separate the tremain.", "logic": "\nSeparate(madelina, tremain)\nSeparate(madelina, marylee)\nUnclasp(madelina, tremain)\nStern(madelina)\nSeparate(tremain, madelina)\nStern(tremain)\nBlotch(tremain, madelina)\nBlotch(tremain, marylee)\nBlotch(tremain, immanuel)\nSeparate(marylee, madelina)\nSeparate(marylee, immanuel)\nBenzylic(marylee)\nBlotch(marylee, madelina)\nSeparate(immanuel, madelina)\nSeparate(immanuel, marylee)\nPorous(immanuel)\nforall x (Unclasp(x, madelina) -> Separate(madelina, marylee))\nforall x (Votive(x) -> Benzylic(x))\nUnclasp(immanuel, tremain) -> Unclasp(tremain, marylee)\nforall x (Benzylic(x) -> Unclasp(x, madelina))\nforall x (Separate(x, tremain) and Blotch(x, marylee) -> Stern(marylee))\nforall x (Separate(x, madelina) and Stern(x) -> Separate(x, tremain))\nforall x (Blotch(x, tremain) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Benzylic(x) and Porous(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\n\nSeparate(immanuel, tremain)\n\nforall x (Separate(x, madelina) and Stern(x) -> Separate(x, tremain)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The dynah congee the sherwood. The dynah congee the ange. The dynah unstring the sherwood. The dynah is holophytic. The sherwood congee the dynah. The sherwood is holophytic. The sherwood dwell the dynah. The sherwood dwell the ange. The sherwood dwell the chuck. The ange congee the dynah. The ange congee the chuck. The ange is cxlv. The ange dwell the dynah. The chuck congee the dynah. The chuck congee the ange. The chuck is earthlike. If something unstring the dynah then the dynah congee the ange. All inflamed things are cxlv. If the chuck unstring the sherwood then the sherwood unstring the ange. If something is cxlv then it unstring the dynah. If something congee the sherwood and it dwell the ange then the ange is holophytic. If something congee the dynah and it is holophytic then it congee the sherwood. If something dwell the sherwood then it is upmarket. All cxlv, earthlike things are upmarket. The dynah is not cxlv.", "logic": "\nCongee(dynah, sherwood)\nCongee(dynah, ange)\nUnstring(dynah, sherwood)\nHolophytic(dynah)\nCongee(sherwood, dynah)\nHolophytic(sherwood)\nDwell(sherwood, dynah)\nDwell(sherwood, ange)\nDwell(sherwood, chuck)\nCongee(ange, dynah)\nCongee(ange, chuck)\nCxlv(ange)\nDwell(ange, dynah)\nCongee(chuck, dynah)\nCongee(chuck, ange)\nEarthlike(chuck)\nforall x (Unstring(x, dynah) -> Congee(dynah, ange))\nforall x (Inflamed(x) -> Cxlv(x))\nUnstring(chuck, sherwood) -> Unstring(sherwood, ange)\nforall x (Cxlv(x) -> Unstring(x, dynah))\nforall x (Congee(x, sherwood) and Dwell(x, ange) -> Holophytic(ange))\nforall x (Congee(x, dynah) and Holophytic(x) -> Congee(x, sherwood))\nforall x (Dwell(x, sherwood) -> Upmarket(x))\nforall x (Cxlv(x) and Earthlike(x) -> Upmarket(x))\n\nnot Cxlv(dynah)\n\nforall x (Inflamed(x) -> Cxlv(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The cobby skimp the maren. The cobby skimp the del. The cobby immingle the maren. The cobby is xxxi. The maren skimp the cobby. The maren is xxxi. The maren toady the cobby. The maren toady the del. The maren toady the willette. The del skimp the cobby. The del skimp the willette. The del is bitter. The del toady the cobby. The willette skimp the cobby. The willette skimp the del. The willette is gimcrack. If something immingle the cobby then the cobby skimp the del. All stingy things are bitter. If the willette immingle the maren then the maren immingle the del. If something is bitter then it immingle the cobby. If something skimp the maren and it toady the del then the del is xxxi. If something skimp the cobby and it is xxxi then it skimp the maren. If something toady the maren then it is reposeful. All bitter, gimcrack things are reposeful. The del is reposeful.", "logic": "\nSkimp(cobby, maren)\nSkimp(cobby, del)\nImmingle(cobby, maren)\nXxxi(cobby)\nSkimp(maren, cobby)\nXxxi(maren)\nToady(maren, cobby)\nToady(maren, del)\nToady(maren, willette)\nSkimp(del, cobby)\nSkimp(del, willette)\nBitter(del)\nToady(del, cobby)\nSkimp(willette, cobby)\nSkimp(willette, del)\nGimcrack(willette)\nforall x (Immingle(x, cobby) -> Skimp(cobby, del))\nforall x (Stingy(x) -> Bitter(x))\nImmingle(willette, maren) -> Immingle(maren, del)\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Immingle(x, cobby))\nforall x (Skimp(x, maren) and Toady(x, del) -> Xxxi(del))\nforall x (Skimp(x, cobby) and Xxxi(x) -> Skimp(x, maren))\nforall x (Toady(x, maren) -> Reposeful(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) and Gimcrack(x) -> Reposeful(x))\n\nReposeful(del)\n\nforall x (Toady(x, maren) -> Reposeful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The laureen appertain the wright. The laureen appertain the melody. The laureen wrinkle the wright. The laureen is sightless. The wright appertain the laureen. The wright is sightless. The wright shallow the laureen. The wright shallow the melody. The wright shallow the donetta. The melody appertain the laureen. The melody appertain the donetta. The melody is songlike. The melody shallow the laureen. The donetta appertain the laureen. The donetta appertain the melody. The donetta is misbranded. If something wrinkle the laureen then the laureen appertain the melody. All capable things are songlike. If the donetta wrinkle the wright then the wright wrinkle the melody. If something is songlike then it wrinkle the laureen. If something appertain the wright and it shallow the melody then the melody is sightless. If something appertain the laureen and it is sightless then it appertain the wright. If something shallow the wright then it is undulate. All songlike, misbranded things are undulate. The melody is not capable.", "logic": "\nAppertain(laureen, wright)\nAppertain(laureen, melody)\nWrinkle(laureen, wright)\nSightless(laureen)\nAppertain(wright, laureen)\nSightless(wright)\nShallow(wright, laureen)\nShallow(wright, melody)\nShallow(wright, donetta)\nAppertain(melody, laureen)\nAppertain(melody, donetta)\nSonglike(melody)\nShallow(melody, laureen)\nAppertain(donetta, laureen)\nAppertain(donetta, melody)\nMisbranded(donetta)\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, laureen) -> Appertain(laureen, melody))\nforall x (Capable(x) -> Songlike(x))\nWrinkle(donetta, wright) -> Wrinkle(wright, melody)\nforall x (Songlike(x) -> Wrinkle(x, laureen))\nforall x (Appertain(x, wright) and Shallow(x, melody) -> Sightless(melody))\nforall x (Appertain(x, laureen) and Sightless(x) -> Appertain(x, wright))\nforall x (Shallow(x, wright) -> Undulate(x))\nforall x (Songlike(x) and Misbranded(x) -> Undulate(x))\n\nnot Capable(melody)\n\nnot Capable(melody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The katherine resolve the sandye. The katherine resolve the rob. The katherine oversleep the sandye. The katherine is eleven. The sandye resolve the katherine. The sandye is eleven. The sandye repress the katherine. The sandye repress the rob. The sandye repress the alison. The rob resolve the katherine. The rob resolve the alison. The rob is biramous. The rob repress the katherine. The alison resolve the katherine. The alison resolve the rob. The alison is crenulated. If something oversleep the katherine then the katherine resolve the rob. All spirituous things are biramous. If the alison oversleep the sandye then the sandye oversleep the rob. If something is biramous then it oversleep the katherine. If something resolve the sandye and it repress the rob then the rob is eleven. If something resolve the katherine and it is eleven then it resolve the sandye. If something repress the sandye then it is chuffed. All biramous, crenulated things are chuffed. The katherine repress the katherine.", "logic": "\nResolve(katherine, sandye)\nResolve(katherine, rob)\nOversleep(katherine, sandye)\nEleven(katherine)\nResolve(sandye, katherine)\nEleven(sandye)\nRepress(sandye, katherine)\nRepress(sandye, rob)\nRepress(sandye, alison)\nResolve(rob, katherine)\nResolve(rob, alison)\nBiramous(rob)\nRepress(rob, katherine)\nResolve(alison, katherine)\nResolve(alison, rob)\nCrenulated(alison)\nforall x (Oversleep(x, katherine) -> Resolve(katherine, rob))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> Biramous(x))\nOversleep(alison, sandye) -> Oversleep(sandye, rob)\nforall x (Biramous(x) -> Oversleep(x, katherine))\nforall x (Resolve(x, sandye) and Repress(x, rob) -> Eleven(rob))\nforall x (Resolve(x, katherine) and Eleven(x) -> Resolve(x, sandye))\nforall x (Repress(x, sandye) -> Chuffed(x))\nforall x (Biramous(x) and Crenulated(x) -> Chuffed(x))\n\nRepress(katherine, katherine)\n\nRepress(katherine, katherine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The olia glamorise the aub. The olia glamorise the valentina. The olia wave the aub. The olia is satirical. The aub glamorise the olia. The aub is satirical. The aub level the olia. The aub level the valentina. The aub level the lusa. The valentina glamorise the olia. The valentina glamorise the lusa. The valentina is glaswegian. The valentina level the olia. The lusa glamorise the olia. The lusa glamorise the valentina. The lusa is hoar. If something wave the olia then the olia glamorise the valentina. All anurous things are glaswegian. If the lusa wave the aub then the aub wave the valentina. If something is glaswegian then it wave the olia. If something glamorise the aub and it level the valentina then the valentina is satirical. If something glamorise the olia and it is satirical then it glamorise the aub. If something level the aub then it is canescent. All glaswegian, hoar things are canescent. The olia does not eat the valentina.", "logic": "\nGlamorise(olia, aub)\nGlamorise(olia, valentina)\nWave(olia, aub)\nSatirical(olia)\nGlamorise(aub, olia)\nSatirical(aub)\nLevel(aub, olia)\nLevel(aub, valentina)\nLevel(aub, lusa)\nGlamorise(valentina, olia)\nGlamorise(valentina, lusa)\nGlaswegian(valentina)\nLevel(valentina, olia)\nGlamorise(lusa, olia)\nGlamorise(lusa, valentina)\nHoar(lusa)\nforall x (Wave(x, olia) -> Glamorise(olia, valentina))\nforall x (Anurous(x) -> Glaswegian(x))\nWave(lusa, aub) -> Wave(aub, valentina)\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) -> Wave(x, olia))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, aub) and Level(x, valentina) -> Satirical(valentina))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, olia) and Satirical(x) -> Glamorise(x, aub))\nforall x (Level(x, aub) -> Canescent(x))\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) and Hoar(x) -> Canescent(x))\n\nnot Wave(olia, valentina)\n\nnot Wave(olia, valentina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The letti rebuff the cyrillus. The letti rebuff the ellene. The letti favor the cyrillus. The letti is dendritic. The cyrillus rebuff the letti. The cyrillus is dendritic. The cyrillus endorse the letti. The cyrillus endorse the ellene. The cyrillus endorse the marilee. The ellene rebuff the letti. The ellene rebuff the marilee. The ellene is ungathered. The ellene endorse the letti. The marilee rebuff the letti. The marilee rebuff the ellene. The marilee is gilbertian. If something favor the letti then the letti rebuff the ellene. All disjointed things are ungathered. If the marilee favor the cyrillus then the cyrillus favor the ellene. If something is ungathered then it favor the letti. If something rebuff the cyrillus and it endorse the ellene then the ellene is dendritic. If something rebuff the letti and it is dendritic then it rebuff the cyrillus. If something endorse the cyrillus then it is whippy. All ungathered, gilbertian things are whippy. The cyrillus rebuff the ellene.", "logic": "\nRebuff(letti, cyrillus)\nRebuff(letti, ellene)\nFavor(letti, cyrillus)\nDendritic(letti)\nRebuff(cyrillus, letti)\nDendritic(cyrillus)\nEndorse(cyrillus, letti)\nEndorse(cyrillus, ellene)\nEndorse(cyrillus, marilee)\nRebuff(ellene, letti)\nRebuff(ellene, marilee)\nUngathered(ellene)\nEndorse(ellene, letti)\nRebuff(marilee, letti)\nRebuff(marilee, ellene)\nGilbertian(marilee)\nforall x (Favor(x, letti) -> Rebuff(letti, ellene))\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> Ungathered(x))\nFavor(marilee, cyrillus) -> Favor(cyrillus, ellene)\nforall x (Ungathered(x) -> Favor(x, letti))\nforall x (Rebuff(x, cyrillus) and Endorse(x, ellene) -> Dendritic(ellene))\nforall x (Rebuff(x, letti) and Dendritic(x) -> Rebuff(x, cyrillus))\nforall x (Endorse(x, cyrillus) -> Whippy(x))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) and Gilbertian(x) -> Whippy(x))\n\nRebuff(cyrillus, ellene)\n\nRebuff(cyrillus, ellene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1591"} {"premises": "The meier is smelling. If someone is flyblown then they are libidinal. The meier is smelling.", "logic": "\nSmelling(meier)\nforall x (Flyblown(x) -> Libidinal(x))\n\nSmelling(meier)\n\ntherefore Smelling(meier)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3313"} {"premises": "The emili is alphameric. If someone is unkeyed then they are kashmiri. The emili is not alphameric.", "logic": "\nAlphameric(emili)\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) -> Kashmiri(x))\n\nnot Alphameric(emili)\n\ntherefore Alphameric(emili)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3313"} {"premises": "The anabelle is suborbital. If someone is incertain then they are unfounded. The anabelle is not unfounded.", "logic": "\nSuborbital(anabelle)\nforall x (Incertain(x) -> Unfounded(x))\n\nnot Unfounded(anabelle)\n\nforall x (Incertain(x) -> Unfounded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3313"} {"premises": "The donielle is lengthened. If someone is abashed then they are imbricated. The donielle needs the donielle.", "logic": "\nLengthened(donielle)\nforall x (Abashed(x) -> Imbricated(x))\n\nNeeds(donielle, donielle)\n\nNeeds(donielle, donielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3313"} {"premises": "Laureen is polyhedral. Myron is polemic. Oralia is polemic. Raphael is anomic. All polyhedral people are anomic. If someone is midget and not erasable then they are scraggly. All polemic people are scraggly. If someone is polemic and not midget then they are scraggly. If someone is anomic and midget then they are inept. If someone is midget and erasable then they are polyhedral. Raphael is anomic.", "logic": "\nPolyhedral(laureen)\nPolemic(myron)\nPolemic(oralia)\nAnomic(raphael)\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Anomic(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) and not Erasable(x) -> Scraggly(x))\nforall x (Polemic(x) -> Scraggly(x))\nforall x (Polemic(x) and not Midget(x) -> Scraggly(x))\nforall x (Anomic(x) and Midget(x) -> Inept(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) and Erasable(x) -> Polyhedral(x))\n\nAnomic(raphael)\n\ntherefore Anomic(raphael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3222"} {"premises": "Schuyler is uncivil. Celia is mutagenic. Idaline is mutagenic. Ansley is tragicomic. All uncivil people are tragicomic. If someone is anomic and not triple then they are motive. All mutagenic people are motive. If someone is mutagenic and not anomic then they are motive. If someone is tragicomic and anomic then they are wifelike. If someone is anomic and triple then they are uncivil. Schuyler is not uncivil.", "logic": "\nUncivil(schuyler)\nMutagenic(celia)\nMutagenic(idaline)\nTragicomic(ansley)\nforall x (Uncivil(x) -> Tragicomic(x))\nforall x (Anomic(x) and not Triple(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and not Anomic(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Tragicomic(x) and Anomic(x) -> Wifelike(x))\nforall x (Anomic(x) and Triple(x) -> Uncivil(x))\n\nnot Uncivil(schuyler)\n\ntherefore Uncivil(schuyler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3222"} {"premises": "Haley is savage. Pet is parvenu. Marius is parvenu. Tish is aphonic. All savage people are aphonic. If someone is burnished and not jailed then they are uncapped. All parvenu people are uncapped. If someone is parvenu and not burnished then they are uncapped. If someone is aphonic and burnished then they are pursuing. If someone is burnished and jailed then they are savage. Tish is not savage.", "logic": "\nSavage(haley)\nParvenu(pet)\nParvenu(marius)\nAphonic(tish)\nforall x (Savage(x) -> Aphonic(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and not Jailed(x) -> Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and not Burnished(x) -> Uncapped(x))\nforall x (Aphonic(x) and Burnished(x) -> Pursuing(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and Jailed(x) -> Savage(x))\n\nnot Savage(tish)\n\nforall x (Burnished(x) and Jailed(x) -> Savage(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3222"} {"premises": "Carolee is aeonian. Berni is unfaceted. Eran is unfaceted. Henry is magyar. All aeonian people are magyar. If someone is anticipant and not provable then they are whiney. All unfaceted people are whiney. If someone is unfaceted and not anticipant then they are whiney. If someone is magyar and anticipant then they are amethyst. If someone is anticipant and provable then they are aeonian. Henry is anticipant.", "logic": "\nAeonian(carolee)\nUnfaceted(berni)\nUnfaceted(eran)\nMagyar(henry)\nforall x (Aeonian(x) -> Magyar(x))\nforall x (Anticipant(x) and not Provable(x) -> Whiney(x))\nforall x (Unfaceted(x) -> Whiney(x))\nforall x (Unfaceted(x) and not Anticipant(x) -> Whiney(x))\nforall x (Magyar(x) and Anticipant(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nforall x (Anticipant(x) and Provable(x) -> Aeonian(x))\n\nAnticipant(henry)\n\nAnticipant(henry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3222"} {"premises": "Mame is clammy. Mame is spanish. Mame is coral. Mame is flavorful. Georges is clammy. Georges is desiccate. Warren is rushy. Warren is spanish. Angelita is coral. Angelita is flavorful. If Georges is clammy then Georges is rushy. If something is coral and spanish then it is rushy. If something is coral and rushy then it is desiccate. Georges is desiccate.", "logic": "\nClammy(mame)\nSpanish(mame)\nCoral(mame)\nFlavorful(mame)\nClammy(georges)\nDesiccate(georges)\nRushy(warren)\nSpanish(warren)\nCoral(angelita)\nFlavorful(angelita)\nClammy(georges) -> Rushy(georges)\nforall x (Coral(x) and Spanish(x) -> Rushy(x))\nforall x (Coral(x) and Rushy(x) -> Desiccate(x))\n\nDesiccate(georges)\n\ntherefore Desiccate(georges)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "Patrick is sozzled. Patrick is dread. Patrick is violet. Patrick is bordered. Jackie is sozzled. Jackie is compounded. Tory is lusitanian. Tory is dread. Caroline is violet. Caroline is bordered. If Jackie is sozzled then Jackie is lusitanian. If something is violet and dread then it is lusitanian. If something is violet and lusitanian then it is compounded. Tory is not lusitanian.", "logic": "\nSozzled(patrick)\nDread(patrick)\nViolet(patrick)\nBordered(patrick)\nSozzled(jackie)\nCompounded(jackie)\nLusitanian(tory)\nDread(tory)\nViolet(caroline)\nBordered(caroline)\nSozzled(jackie) -> Lusitanian(jackie)\nforall x (Violet(x) and Dread(x) -> Lusitanian(x))\nforall x (Violet(x) and Lusitanian(x) -> Compounded(x))\n\nnot Lusitanian(tory)\n\ntherefore Lusitanian(tory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "Gena is superb. Gena is carboxyl. Gena is boozy. Gena is every. Juline is superb. Juline is startled. Brinkley is unearned. Brinkley is carboxyl. Ignazio is boozy. Ignazio is every. If Juline is superb then Juline is unearned. If something is boozy and carboxyl then it is unearned. If something is boozy and unearned then it is startled. Juline is unearned.", "logic": "\nSuperb(gena)\nCarboxyl(gena)\nBoozy(gena)\nEvery(gena)\nSuperb(juline)\nStartled(juline)\nUnearned(brinkley)\nCarboxyl(brinkley)\nBoozy(ignazio)\nEvery(ignazio)\nSuperb(juline) -> Unearned(juline)\nforall x (Boozy(x) and Carboxyl(x) -> Unearned(x))\nforall x (Boozy(x) and Unearned(x) -> Startled(x))\n\nUnearned(juline)\n\nSuperb(juline) and Superb(juline) -> Unearned(juline) -> therefore Unearned(juline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "Ermina is downwind. Ermina is finer. Ermina is nearby. Ermina is mozartean. Annamarie is downwind. Annamarie is unflagging. Ashlen is spheroidal. Ashlen is finer. Fredrick is nearby. Fredrick is mozartean. If Annamarie is downwind then Annamarie is spheroidal. If something is nearby and finer then it is spheroidal. If something is nearby and spheroidal then it is unflagging. Ermina is not spheroidal.", "logic": "\nDownwind(ermina)\nFiner(ermina)\nNearby(ermina)\nMozartean(ermina)\nDownwind(annamarie)\nUnflagging(annamarie)\nSpheroidal(ashlen)\nFiner(ashlen)\nNearby(fredrick)\nMozartean(fredrick)\nDownwind(annamarie) -> Spheroidal(annamarie)\nforall x (Nearby(x) and Finer(x) -> Spheroidal(x))\nforall x (Nearby(x) and Spheroidal(x) -> Unflagging(x))\n\nnot Spheroidal(ermina)\n\nNearby(ermina) and Finer(ermina) and forall x (Nearby(x) and Finer(x) -> Spheroidal(x)) -> therefore Spheroidal(ermina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "Abraham is truncate. Abraham is nighted. Abraham is vacuolated. Abraham is nominal. Theda is truncate. Theda is depictive. Petunia is gigantic. Petunia is nighted. Scarface is vacuolated. Scarface is nominal. If Theda is truncate then Theda is gigantic. If something is vacuolated and nighted then it is gigantic. If something is vacuolated and gigantic then it is depictive. Scarface is not depictive.", "logic": "\nTruncate(abraham)\nNighted(abraham)\nVacuolated(abraham)\nNominal(abraham)\nTruncate(theda)\nDepictive(theda)\nGigantic(petunia)\nNighted(petunia)\nVacuolated(scarface)\nNominal(scarface)\nTruncate(theda) -> Gigantic(theda)\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) and Nighted(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) and Gigantic(x) -> Depictive(x))\n\nnot Depictive(scarface)\n\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) and Gigantic(x) -> Depictive(x)) <- forall x (Vacuolated(x) and Nighted(x) -> Gigantic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "Rosalynd is syncretic. Rosalynd is fond. Rosalynd is unadjusted. Rosalynd is rippled. Laryssa is syncretic. Laryssa is jainist. Tandy is bonzer. Tandy is fond. Rey is unadjusted. Rey is rippled. If Laryssa is syncretic then Laryssa is bonzer. If something is unadjusted and fond then it is bonzer. If something is unadjusted and bonzer then it is jainist. Tandy is jainist.", "logic": "\nSyncretic(rosalynd)\nFond(rosalynd)\nUnadjusted(rosalynd)\nRippled(rosalynd)\nSyncretic(laryssa)\nJainist(laryssa)\nBonzer(tandy)\nFond(tandy)\nUnadjusted(rey)\nRippled(rey)\nSyncretic(laryssa) -> Bonzer(laryssa)\nforall x (Unadjusted(x) and Fond(x) -> Bonzer(x))\nforall x (Unadjusted(x) and Bonzer(x) -> Jainist(x))\n\nJainist(tandy)\n\nforall x (Unadjusted(x) and Bonzer(x) -> Jainist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "Renaldo is jutting. Renaldo is renegade. Renaldo is alaskan. Renaldo is feeble. See is jutting. See is mingy. Gwyneth is scalloped. Gwyneth is renegade. Marget is alaskan. Marget is feeble. If See is jutting then See is scalloped. If something is alaskan and renegade then it is scalloped. If something is alaskan and scalloped then it is mingy. See is not red.", "logic": "\nJutting(renaldo)\nRenegade(renaldo)\nAlaskan(renaldo)\nFeeble(renaldo)\nJutting(see)\nMingy(see)\nScalloped(gwyneth)\nRenegade(gwyneth)\nAlaskan(marget)\nFeeble(marget)\nJutting(see) -> Scalloped(see)\nforall x (Alaskan(x) and Renegade(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nforall x (Alaskan(x) and Scalloped(x) -> Mingy(x))\n\nnot Red(see)\n\nnot Red(see) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "Claribel is neandertal. Claribel is botonee. Claribel is dejected. Claribel is tibetan. Elyse is neandertal. Elyse is fettered. Joanne is worn. Joanne is botonee. Chriss is dejected. Chriss is tibetan. If Elyse is neandertal then Elyse is worn. If something is dejected and botonee then it is worn. If something is dejected and worn then it is fettered. Elyse is dejected.", "logic": "\nNeandertal(claribel)\nBotonee(claribel)\nDejected(claribel)\nTibetan(claribel)\nNeandertal(elyse)\nFettered(elyse)\nWorn(joanne)\nBotonee(joanne)\nDejected(chriss)\nTibetan(chriss)\nNeandertal(elyse) -> Worn(elyse)\nforall x (Dejected(x) and Botonee(x) -> Worn(x))\nforall x (Dejected(x) and Worn(x) -> Fettered(x))\n\nDejected(elyse)\n\nDejected(elyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-602"} {"premises": "The aleecia stet the sonny. The gunilla stet the loni. The gunilla stet the sonny. The gunilla is retrograde. The gunilla is cetacean. The gunilla golf the aleecia. The gunilla golf the loni. The gunilla golf the sonny. The gunilla overact the aleecia. The gunilla overact the loni. The loni stet the aleecia. The loni stet the sonny. The loni is retrograde. The loni overact the aleecia. The sonny golf the aleecia. If something is tabu then it is prying. If the gunilla stet the loni then the loni is tabu. If something is humbling then it golf the aleecia. The gunilla stet the loni.", "logic": "\nStet(aleecia, sonny)\nStet(gunilla, loni)\nStet(gunilla, sonny)\nRetrograde(gunilla)\nCetacean(gunilla)\nGolf(gunilla, aleecia)\nGolf(gunilla, loni)\nGolf(gunilla, sonny)\nOveract(gunilla, aleecia)\nOveract(gunilla, loni)\nStet(loni, aleecia)\nStet(loni, sonny)\nRetrograde(loni)\nOveract(loni, aleecia)\nGolf(sonny, aleecia)\nforall x (Tabu(x) -> Prying(x))\nStet(gunilla, loni) -> Tabu(loni)\nforall x (Humbling(x) -> Golf(x, aleecia))\n\nStet(gunilla, loni)\n\ntherefore Stet(gunilla, loni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The sela knife the sky. The goldie knife the franky. The goldie knife the sky. The goldie is incoming. The goldie is maudlin. The goldie aerify the sela. The goldie aerify the franky. The goldie aerify the sky. The goldie snuggle the sela. The goldie snuggle the franky. The franky knife the sela. The franky knife the sky. The franky is incoming. The franky snuggle the sela. The sky aerify the sela. If something is deckled then it is unary. If the goldie knife the franky then the franky is deckled. If something is imploring then it aerify the sela. The sky does not like the sela.", "logic": "\nKnife(sela, sky)\nKnife(goldie, franky)\nKnife(goldie, sky)\nIncoming(goldie)\nMaudlin(goldie)\nAerify(goldie, sela)\nAerify(goldie, franky)\nAerify(goldie, sky)\nSnuggle(goldie, sela)\nSnuggle(goldie, franky)\nKnife(franky, sela)\nKnife(franky, sky)\nIncoming(franky)\nSnuggle(franky, sela)\nAerify(sky, sela)\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Unary(x))\nKnife(goldie, franky) -> Deckled(franky)\nforall x (Imploring(x) -> Aerify(x, sela))\n\nnot Aerify(sky, sela)\n\ntherefore Aerify(sky, sela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The filip stretch the melania. The devina stretch the norma. The devina stretch the melania. The devina is carsick. The devina is frictional. The devina cauterise the filip. The devina cauterise the norma. The devina cauterise the melania. The devina witch the filip. The devina witch the norma. The norma stretch the filip. The norma stretch the melania. The norma is carsick. The norma witch the filip. The melania cauterise the filip. If something is scapose then it is cryptical. If the devina stretch the norma then the norma is scapose. If something is sunrise then it cauterise the filip. The norma is scapose.", "logic": "\nStretch(filip, melania)\nStretch(devina, norma)\nStretch(devina, melania)\nCarsick(devina)\nFrictional(devina)\nCauterise(devina, filip)\nCauterise(devina, norma)\nCauterise(devina, melania)\nWitch(devina, filip)\nWitch(devina, norma)\nStretch(norma, filip)\nStretch(norma, melania)\nCarsick(norma)\nWitch(norma, filip)\nCauterise(melania, filip)\nforall x (Scapose(x) -> Cryptical(x))\nStretch(devina, norma) -> Scapose(norma)\nforall x (Sunrise(x) -> Cauterise(x, filip))\n\nScapose(norma)\n\nStretch(devina, norma) and Stretch(devina, norma) -> Scapose(norma) -> therefore Scapose(norma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The neysa misfire the mohammed. The nealon misfire the ronny. The nealon misfire the mohammed. The nealon is motorised. The nealon is bared. The nealon cast the neysa. The nealon cast the ronny. The nealon cast the mohammed. The nealon belittle the neysa. The nealon belittle the ronny. The ronny misfire the neysa. The ronny misfire the mohammed. The ronny is motorised. The ronny belittle the neysa. The mohammed cast the neysa. If something is propitious then it is ripping. If the nealon misfire the ronny then the ronny is propitious. If something is leadless then it cast the neysa. The ronny is not propitious.", "logic": "\nMisfire(neysa, mohammed)\nMisfire(nealon, ronny)\nMisfire(nealon, mohammed)\nMotorised(nealon)\nBared(nealon)\nCast(nealon, neysa)\nCast(nealon, ronny)\nCast(nealon, mohammed)\nBelittle(nealon, neysa)\nBelittle(nealon, ronny)\nMisfire(ronny, neysa)\nMisfire(ronny, mohammed)\nMotorised(ronny)\nBelittle(ronny, neysa)\nCast(mohammed, neysa)\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Ripping(x))\nMisfire(nealon, ronny) -> Propitious(ronny)\nforall x (Leadless(x) -> Cast(x, neysa))\n\nnot Propitious(ronny)\n\nMisfire(nealon, ronny) and Misfire(nealon, ronny) -> Propitious(ronny) -> therefore Propitious(ronny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The kaile reschedule the deeann. The sawyere reschedule the bill. The sawyere reschedule the deeann. The sawyere is shadowed. The sawyere is unshelled. The sawyere clapboard the kaile. The sawyere clapboard the bill. The sawyere clapboard the deeann. The sawyere implode the kaile. The sawyere implode the bill. The bill reschedule the kaile. The bill reschedule the deeann. The bill is shadowed. The bill implode the kaile. The deeann clapboard the kaile. If something is savourless then it is dentate. If the sawyere reschedule the bill then the bill is savourless. If something is salaried then it clapboard the kaile. The bill is dentate.", "logic": "\nReschedule(kaile, deeann)\nReschedule(sawyere, bill)\nReschedule(sawyere, deeann)\nShadowed(sawyere)\nUnshelled(sawyere)\nClapboard(sawyere, kaile)\nClapboard(sawyere, bill)\nClapboard(sawyere, deeann)\nImplode(sawyere, kaile)\nImplode(sawyere, bill)\nReschedule(bill, kaile)\nReschedule(bill, deeann)\nShadowed(bill)\nImplode(bill, kaile)\nClapboard(deeann, kaile)\nforall x (Savourless(x) -> Dentate(x))\nReschedule(sawyere, bill) -> Savourless(bill)\nforall x (Salaried(x) -> Clapboard(x, kaile))\n\nDentate(bill)\n\nReschedule(sawyere, bill) and Reschedule(sawyere, bill) -> Savourless(bill) -> therefore Savourless(bill) Savourless(bill) and forall x (Savourless(x) -> Dentate(x)) -> therefore Dentate(bill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The belinda crystalize the matilde. The lelah crystalize the leshia. The lelah crystalize the matilde. The lelah is instant. The lelah is neotenic. The lelah pillage the belinda. The lelah pillage the leshia. The lelah pillage the matilde. The lelah egress the belinda. The lelah egress the leshia. The leshia crystalize the belinda. The leshia crystalize the matilde. The leshia is instant. The leshia egress the belinda. The matilde pillage the belinda. If something is molal then it is wellborn. If the lelah crystalize the leshia then the leshia is molal. If something is alone then it pillage the belinda. The leshia is not wellborn.", "logic": "\nCrystalize(belinda, matilde)\nCrystalize(lelah, leshia)\nCrystalize(lelah, matilde)\nInstant(lelah)\nNeotenic(lelah)\nPillage(lelah, belinda)\nPillage(lelah, leshia)\nPillage(lelah, matilde)\nEgress(lelah, belinda)\nEgress(lelah, leshia)\nCrystalize(leshia, belinda)\nCrystalize(leshia, matilde)\nInstant(leshia)\nEgress(leshia, belinda)\nPillage(matilde, belinda)\nforall x (Molal(x) -> Wellborn(x))\nCrystalize(lelah, leshia) -> Molal(leshia)\nforall x (Alone(x) -> Pillage(x, belinda))\n\nnot Wellborn(leshia)\n\nCrystalize(lelah, leshia) and Crystalize(lelah, leshia) -> Molal(leshia) -> therefore Molal(leshia) Molal(leshia) and forall x (Molal(x) -> Wellborn(x)) -> therefore Wellborn(leshia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The pat ripple the dory. The corinna ripple the perri. The corinna ripple the dory. The corinna is satisfied. The corinna is together. The corinna bemoan the pat. The corinna bemoan the perri. The corinna bemoan the dory. The corinna acquit the pat. The corinna acquit the perri. The perri ripple the pat. The perri ripple the dory. The perri is satisfied. The perri acquit the pat. The dory bemoan the pat. If something is chechen then it is hysteric. If the corinna ripple the perri then the perri is chechen. If something is muslim then it bemoan the pat. The dory is not hysteric.", "logic": "\nRipple(pat, dory)\nRipple(corinna, perri)\nRipple(corinna, dory)\nSatisfied(corinna)\nTogether(corinna)\nBemoan(corinna, pat)\nBemoan(corinna, perri)\nBemoan(corinna, dory)\nAcquit(corinna, pat)\nAcquit(corinna, perri)\nRipple(perri, pat)\nRipple(perri, dory)\nSatisfied(perri)\nAcquit(perri, pat)\nBemoan(dory, pat)\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Hysteric(x))\nRipple(corinna, perri) -> Chechen(perri)\nforall x (Muslim(x) -> Bemoan(x, pat))\n\nnot Hysteric(dory)\n\nforall x (Chechen(x) -> Hysteric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The steward obstipate the oralla. The flore obstipate the letty. The flore obstipate the oralla. The flore is rushed. The flore is uncarpeted. The flore salivate the steward. The flore salivate the letty. The flore salivate the oralla. The flore dignify the steward. The flore dignify the letty. The letty obstipate the steward. The letty obstipate the oralla. The letty is rushed. The letty dignify the steward. The oralla salivate the steward. If something is boracic then it is branchial. If the flore obstipate the letty then the letty is boracic. If something is agonal then it salivate the steward. The steward is branchial.", "logic": "\nObstipate(steward, oralla)\nObstipate(flore, letty)\nObstipate(flore, oralla)\nRushed(flore)\nUncarpeted(flore)\nSalivate(flore, steward)\nSalivate(flore, letty)\nSalivate(flore, oralla)\nDignify(flore, steward)\nDignify(flore, letty)\nObstipate(letty, steward)\nObstipate(letty, oralla)\nRushed(letty)\nDignify(letty, steward)\nSalivate(oralla, steward)\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Branchial(x))\nObstipate(flore, letty) -> Boracic(letty)\nforall x (Agonal(x) -> Salivate(x, steward))\n\nBranchial(steward)\n\nforall x (Boracic(x) -> Branchial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The raquela cackle the dew. The marylinda cackle the cosette. The marylinda cackle the dew. The marylinda is unaffected. The marylinda is burled. The marylinda practice the raquela. The marylinda practice the cosette. The marylinda practice the dew. The marylinda deterge the raquela. The marylinda deterge the cosette. The cosette cackle the raquela. The cosette cackle the dew. The cosette is unaffected. The cosette deterge the raquela. The dew practice the raquela. If something is troubling then it is methodist. If the marylinda cackle the cosette then the cosette is troubling. If something is hotheaded then it practice the raquela. The raquela does not like the raquela.", "logic": "\nCackle(raquela, dew)\nCackle(marylinda, cosette)\nCackle(marylinda, dew)\nUnaffected(marylinda)\nBurled(marylinda)\nPractice(marylinda, raquela)\nPractice(marylinda, cosette)\nPractice(marylinda, dew)\nDeterge(marylinda, raquela)\nDeterge(marylinda, cosette)\nCackle(cosette, raquela)\nCackle(cosette, dew)\nUnaffected(cosette)\nDeterge(cosette, raquela)\nPractice(dew, raquela)\nforall x (Troubling(x) -> Methodist(x))\nCackle(marylinda, cosette) -> Troubling(cosette)\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Practice(x, raquela))\n\nnot Practice(raquela, raquela)\n\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Practice(x, raquela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The diego pepper the wini. The sidnee pepper the nicolle. The sidnee pepper the wini. The sidnee is anarchic. The sidnee is tangled. The sidnee clump the diego. The sidnee clump the nicolle. The sidnee clump the wini. The sidnee raze the diego. The sidnee raze the nicolle. The nicolle pepper the diego. The nicolle pepper the wini. The nicolle is anarchic. The nicolle raze the diego. The wini clump the diego. If something is empty then it is panoptical. If the sidnee pepper the nicolle then the nicolle is empty. If something is diarrhoeal then it clump the diego. The diego raze the sidnee.", "logic": "\nPepper(diego, wini)\nPepper(sidnee, nicolle)\nPepper(sidnee, wini)\nAnarchic(sidnee)\nTangled(sidnee)\nClump(sidnee, diego)\nClump(sidnee, nicolle)\nClump(sidnee, wini)\nRaze(sidnee, diego)\nRaze(sidnee, nicolle)\nPepper(nicolle, diego)\nPepper(nicolle, wini)\nAnarchic(nicolle)\nRaze(nicolle, diego)\nClump(wini, diego)\nforall x (Empty(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nPepper(sidnee, nicolle) -> Empty(nicolle)\nforall x (Diarrhoeal(x) -> Clump(x, diego))\n\nRaze(diego, sidnee)\n\nRaze(diego, sidnee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The cori fettle the gloriane. The laney fettle the meara. The laney fettle the gloriane. The laney is tentacled. The laney is hominian. The laney inactivate the cori. The laney inactivate the meara. The laney inactivate the gloriane. The laney jaunt the cori. The laney jaunt the meara. The meara fettle the cori. The meara fettle the gloriane. The meara is tentacled. The meara jaunt the cori. The gloriane inactivate the cori. If something is obliging then it is bilateral. If the laney fettle the meara then the meara is obliging. If something is outback then it inactivate the cori. The laney is not obliging.", "logic": "\nFettle(cori, gloriane)\nFettle(laney, meara)\nFettle(laney, gloriane)\nTentacled(laney)\nHominian(laney)\nInactivate(laney, cori)\nInactivate(laney, meara)\nInactivate(laney, gloriane)\nJaunt(laney, cori)\nJaunt(laney, meara)\nFettle(meara, cori)\nFettle(meara, gloriane)\nTentacled(meara)\nJaunt(meara, cori)\nInactivate(gloriane, cori)\nforall x (Obliging(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nFettle(laney, meara) -> Obliging(meara)\nforall x (Outback(x) -> Inactivate(x, cori))\n\nnot Obliging(laney)\n\nnot Obliging(laney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The lazare reinstall the desirae. The conway reinstall the janice. The conway reinstall the desirae. The conway is corny. The conway is unlined. The conway leach the lazare. The conway leach the janice. The conway leach the desirae. The conway allege the lazare. The conway allege the janice. The janice reinstall the lazare. The janice reinstall the desirae. The janice is corny. The janice allege the lazare. The desirae leach the lazare. If something is mannish then it is hifalutin. If the conway reinstall the janice then the janice is mannish. If something is squiffy then it leach the lazare. The conway allege the conway.", "logic": "\nReinstall(lazare, desirae)\nReinstall(conway, janice)\nReinstall(conway, desirae)\nCorny(conway)\nUnlined(conway)\nLeach(conway, lazare)\nLeach(conway, janice)\nLeach(conway, desirae)\nAllege(conway, lazare)\nAllege(conway, janice)\nReinstall(janice, lazare)\nReinstall(janice, desirae)\nCorny(janice)\nAllege(janice, lazare)\nLeach(desirae, lazare)\nforall x (Mannish(x) -> Hifalutin(x))\nReinstall(conway, janice) -> Mannish(janice)\nforall x (Squiffy(x) -> Leach(x, lazare))\n\nAllege(conway, conway)\n\nAllege(conway, conway) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-671"} {"premises": "The pauline truncate the monty. The pauline is ungroomed. The monty diffract the pauline. If something truncate the monty and the monty diffract the pauline then the pauline diffract the monty. If something diffract the monty then it diffract the pauline. If something diffract the pauline and the pauline is ungroomed then it rival the pauline. The monty diffract the pauline.", "logic": "\nTruncate(pauline, monty)\nUngroomed(pauline)\nDiffract(monty, pauline)\nforall x (Truncate(x, monty) and Diffract(monty, pauline) -> Diffract(pauline, monty))\nforall x (Diffract(x, monty) -> Diffract(x, pauline))\nforall x (Diffract(x, pauline) and Ungroomed(pauline) -> Rival(x, pauline))\n\nDiffract(monty, pauline)\n\ntherefore Diffract(monty, pauline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The jacquetta digest the elisabet. The jacquetta is medical. The elisabet floodlight the jacquetta. If something digest the elisabet and the elisabet floodlight the jacquetta then the jacquetta floodlight the elisabet. If something floodlight the elisabet then it floodlight the jacquetta. If something floodlight the jacquetta and the jacquetta is medical then it houseclean the jacquetta. The elisabet does not need the jacquetta.", "logic": "\nDigest(jacquetta, elisabet)\nMedical(jacquetta)\nFloodlight(elisabet, jacquetta)\nforall x (Digest(x, elisabet) and Floodlight(elisabet, jacquetta) -> Floodlight(jacquetta, elisabet))\nforall x (Floodlight(x, elisabet) -> Floodlight(x, jacquetta))\nforall x (Floodlight(x, jacquetta) and Medical(jacquetta) -> Houseclean(x, jacquetta))\n\nnot Floodlight(elisabet, jacquetta)\n\ntherefore Floodlight(elisabet, jacquetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The devonne tire the briteny. The devonne is impending. The briteny aver the devonne. If something tire the briteny and the briteny aver the devonne then the devonne aver the briteny. If something aver the briteny then it aver the devonne. If something aver the devonne and the devonne is impending then it transfer the devonne. The devonne aver the briteny.", "logic": "\nTire(devonne, briteny)\nImpending(devonne)\nAver(briteny, devonne)\nforall x (Tire(x, briteny) and Aver(briteny, devonne) -> Aver(devonne, briteny))\nforall x (Aver(x, briteny) -> Aver(x, devonne))\nforall x (Aver(x, devonne) and Impending(devonne) -> Transfer(x, devonne))\n\nAver(devonne, briteny)\n\nTire(devonne, briteny) and Aver(briteny, devonne) and forall x (Tire(x, briteny) and Aver(briteny, devonne) -> Aver(devonne, briteny)) -> therefore Aver(devonne, briteny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The rheba glimmer the darleen. The rheba is contingent. The darleen rave the rheba. If something glimmer the darleen and the darleen rave the rheba then the rheba rave the darleen. If something rave the darleen then it rave the rheba. If something rave the rheba and the rheba is contingent then it dawdle the rheba. The rheba does not need the darleen.", "logic": "\nGlimmer(rheba, darleen)\nContingent(rheba)\nRave(darleen, rheba)\nforall x (Glimmer(x, darleen) and Rave(darleen, rheba) -> Rave(rheba, darleen))\nforall x (Rave(x, darleen) -> Rave(x, rheba))\nforall x (Rave(x, rheba) and Contingent(rheba) -> Dawdle(x, rheba))\n\nnot Rave(rheba, darleen)\n\nGlimmer(rheba, darleen) and Rave(darleen, rheba) and forall x (Glimmer(x, darleen) and Rave(darleen, rheba) -> Rave(rheba, darleen)) -> therefore Rave(rheba, darleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The caroljean foot the chaddie. The caroljean is weird. The chaddie dissever the caroljean. If something foot the chaddie and the chaddie dissever the caroljean then the caroljean dissever the chaddie. If something dissever the chaddie then it dissever the caroljean. If something dissever the caroljean and the caroljean is weird then it compart the caroljean. The caroljean dissever the caroljean.", "logic": "\nFoot(caroljean, chaddie)\nWeird(caroljean)\nDissever(chaddie, caroljean)\nforall x (Foot(x, chaddie) and Dissever(chaddie, caroljean) -> Dissever(caroljean, chaddie))\nforall x (Dissever(x, chaddie) -> Dissever(x, caroljean))\nforall x (Dissever(x, caroljean) and Weird(caroljean) -> Compart(x, caroljean))\n\nDissever(caroljean, caroljean)\n\nFoot(caroljean, chaddie) and Dissever(chaddie, caroljean) and forall x (Foot(x, chaddie) and Dissever(chaddie, caroljean) -> Dissever(caroljean, chaddie)) -> therefore Dissever(caroljean, chaddie) Dissever(caroljean, chaddie) and forall x (Dissever(x, chaddie) -> Dissever(x, caroljean)) -> therefore Dissever(caroljean, caroljean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The curtice adhere the gilles. The curtice is maroon. The gilles quarrel the curtice. If something adhere the gilles and the gilles quarrel the curtice then the curtice quarrel the gilles. If something quarrel the gilles then it quarrel the curtice. If something quarrel the curtice and the curtice is maroon then it declaim the curtice. The curtice does not need the curtice.", "logic": "\nAdhere(curtice, gilles)\nMaroon(curtice)\nQuarrel(gilles, curtice)\nforall x (Adhere(x, gilles) and Quarrel(gilles, curtice) -> Quarrel(curtice, gilles))\nforall x (Quarrel(x, gilles) -> Quarrel(x, curtice))\nforall x (Quarrel(x, curtice) and Maroon(curtice) -> Declaim(x, curtice))\n\nnot Quarrel(curtice, curtice)\n\nAdhere(curtice, gilles) and Quarrel(gilles, curtice) and forall x (Adhere(x, gilles) and Quarrel(gilles, curtice) -> Quarrel(curtice, gilles)) -> therefore Quarrel(curtice, gilles) Quarrel(curtice, gilles) and forall x (Quarrel(x, gilles) -> Quarrel(x, curtice)) -> therefore Quarrel(curtice, curtice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The carlton serenade the maggi. The carlton is catarrhal. The maggi parachute the carlton. If something serenade the maggi and the maggi parachute the carlton then the carlton parachute the maggi. If something parachute the maggi then it parachute the carlton. If something parachute the carlton and the carlton is catarrhal then it berate the carlton. The carlton berate the carlton.", "logic": "\nSerenade(carlton, maggi)\nCatarrhal(carlton)\nParachute(maggi, carlton)\nforall x (Serenade(x, maggi) and Parachute(maggi, carlton) -> Parachute(carlton, maggi))\nforall x (Parachute(x, maggi) -> Parachute(x, carlton))\nforall x (Parachute(x, carlton) and Catarrhal(carlton) -> Berate(x, carlton))\n\nBerate(carlton, carlton)\n\nSerenade(carlton, maggi) and Parachute(maggi, carlton) and forall x (Serenade(x, maggi) and Parachute(maggi, carlton) -> Parachute(carlton, maggi)) -> therefore Parachute(carlton, maggi) Parachute(carlton, maggi) and forall x (Parachute(x, maggi) -> Parachute(x, carlton)) -> therefore Parachute(carlton, carlton) Parachute(carlton, carlton) and Catarrhal(carlton) and forall x (Parachute(x, carlton) and Catarrhal(carlton) -> Berate(x, carlton)) -> therefore Berate(carlton, carlton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The cinda monetise the alla. The cinda is unpainted. The alla exhort the cinda. If something monetise the alla and the alla exhort the cinda then the cinda exhort the alla. If something exhort the alla then it exhort the cinda. If something exhort the cinda and the cinda is unpainted then it resume the cinda. The cinda does not see the cinda.", "logic": "\nMonetise(cinda, alla)\nUnpainted(cinda)\nExhort(alla, cinda)\nforall x (Monetise(x, alla) and Exhort(alla, cinda) -> Exhort(cinda, alla))\nforall x (Exhort(x, alla) -> Exhort(x, cinda))\nforall x (Exhort(x, cinda) and Unpainted(cinda) -> Resume(x, cinda))\n\nnot Resume(cinda, cinda)\n\nMonetise(cinda, alla) and Exhort(alla, cinda) and forall x (Monetise(x, alla) and Exhort(alla, cinda) -> Exhort(cinda, alla)) -> therefore Exhort(cinda, alla) Exhort(cinda, alla) and forall x (Exhort(x, alla) -> Exhort(x, cinda)) -> therefore Exhort(cinda, cinda) Exhort(cinda, cinda) and Unpainted(cinda) and forall x (Exhort(x, cinda) and Unpainted(cinda) -> Resume(x, cinda)) -> therefore Resume(cinda, cinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The sacha accustom the marissa. The sacha is mercuric. The marissa mould the sacha. If something accustom the marissa and the marissa mould the sacha then the sacha mould the marissa. If something mould the marissa then it mould the sacha. If something mould the sacha and the sacha is mercuric then it daub the sacha. The marissa does not chase the sacha.", "logic": "\nAccustom(sacha, marissa)\nMercuric(sacha)\nMould(marissa, sacha)\nforall x (Accustom(x, marissa) and Mould(marissa, sacha) -> Mould(sacha, marissa))\nforall x (Mould(x, marissa) -> Mould(x, sacha))\nforall x (Mould(x, sacha) and Mercuric(sacha) -> Daub(x, sacha))\n\nnot Accustom(marissa, sacha)\n\nnot Accustom(marissa, sacha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The serena embellish the trev. The serena is entozoan. The trev receive the serena. If something embellish the trev and the trev receive the serena then the serena receive the trev. If something receive the trev then it receive the serena. If something receive the serena and the serena is entozoan then it paddle the serena. The trev is young.", "logic": "\nEmbellish(serena, trev)\nEntozoan(serena)\nReceive(trev, serena)\nforall x (Embellish(x, trev) and Receive(trev, serena) -> Receive(serena, trev))\nforall x (Receive(x, trev) -> Receive(x, serena))\nforall x (Receive(x, serena) and Entozoan(serena) -> Paddle(x, serena))\n\nYoung(trev)\n\nYoung(trev) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The silvester enjoin the bianca. The silvester is swayback. The bianca beleaguer the silvester. If something enjoin the bianca and the bianca beleaguer the silvester then the silvester beleaguer the bianca. If something beleaguer the bianca then it beleaguer the silvester. If something beleaguer the silvester and the silvester is swayback then it certify the silvester. The silvester is not young.", "logic": "\nEnjoin(silvester, bianca)\nSwayback(silvester)\nBeleaguer(bianca, silvester)\nforall x (Enjoin(x, bianca) and Beleaguer(bianca, silvester) -> Beleaguer(silvester, bianca))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, bianca) -> Beleaguer(x, silvester))\nforall x (Beleaguer(x, silvester) and Swayback(silvester) -> Certify(x, silvester))\n\nnot Young(silvester)\n\nnot Young(silvester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The arabela dignify the spencer. The arabela is delimited. The spencer start the arabela. If something dignify the spencer and the spencer start the arabela then the arabela start the spencer. If something start the spencer then it start the arabela. If something start the arabela and the arabela is delimited then it squint the arabela. The spencer squint the spencer.", "logic": "\nDignify(arabela, spencer)\nDelimited(arabela)\nStart(spencer, arabela)\nforall x (Dignify(x, spencer) and Start(spencer, arabela) -> Start(arabela, spencer))\nforall x (Start(x, spencer) -> Start(x, arabela))\nforall x (Start(x, arabela) and Delimited(arabela) -> Squint(x, arabela))\n\nSquint(spencer, spencer)\n\nSquint(spencer, spencer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The shoshie nail the andria. The shoshie is nonleaded. The andria suffice the shoshie. If something nail the andria and the andria suffice the shoshie then the shoshie suffice the andria. If something suffice the andria then it suffice the shoshie. If something suffice the shoshie and the shoshie is nonleaded then it counteract the shoshie. The shoshie does not see the andria.", "logic": "\nNail(shoshie, andria)\nNonleaded(shoshie)\nSuffice(andria, shoshie)\nforall x (Nail(x, andria) and Suffice(andria, shoshie) -> Suffice(shoshie, andria))\nforall x (Suffice(x, andria) -> Suffice(x, shoshie))\nforall x (Suffice(x, shoshie) and Nonleaded(shoshie) -> Counteract(x, shoshie))\n\nnot Counteract(shoshie, andria)\n\nnot Counteract(shoshie, andria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The matteo harrow the rainer. The matteo is wistful. The rainer extinguish the matteo. If something harrow the rainer and the rainer extinguish the matteo then the matteo extinguish the rainer. If something extinguish the rainer then it extinguish the matteo. If something extinguish the matteo and the matteo is wistful then it slush the matteo. The matteo is green.", "logic": "\nHarrow(matteo, rainer)\nWistful(matteo)\nExtinguish(rainer, matteo)\nforall x (Harrow(x, rainer) and Extinguish(rainer, matteo) -> Extinguish(matteo, rainer))\nforall x (Extinguish(x, rainer) -> Extinguish(x, matteo))\nforall x (Extinguish(x, matteo) and Wistful(matteo) -> Slush(x, matteo))\n\nGreen(matteo)\n\nGreen(matteo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The davon squander the darb. The davon is telescopic. The darb cuddle the davon. If something squander the darb and the darb cuddle the davon then the davon cuddle the darb. If something cuddle the darb then it cuddle the davon. If something cuddle the davon and the davon is telescopic then it copper the davon. The darb is not green.", "logic": "\nSquander(davon, darb)\nTelescopic(davon)\nCuddle(darb, davon)\nforall x (Squander(x, darb) and Cuddle(darb, davon) -> Cuddle(davon, darb))\nforall x (Cuddle(x, darb) -> Cuddle(x, davon))\nforall x (Cuddle(x, davon) and Telescopic(davon) -> Copper(x, davon))\n\nnot Green(darb)\n\nnot Green(darb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The hillary corrugate the sancho. The hillary is motivative. The sancho refund the hillary. If something corrugate the sancho and the sancho refund the hillary then the hillary refund the sancho. If something refund the sancho then it refund the hillary. If something refund the hillary and the hillary is motivative then it tonsure the hillary. The sancho is big.", "logic": "\nCorrugate(hillary, sancho)\nMotivative(hillary)\nRefund(sancho, hillary)\nforall x (Corrugate(x, sancho) and Refund(sancho, hillary) -> Refund(hillary, sancho))\nforall x (Refund(x, sancho) -> Refund(x, hillary))\nforall x (Refund(x, hillary) and Motivative(hillary) -> Tonsure(x, hillary))\n\nBig(sancho)\n\nBig(sancho) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-159"} {"premises": "The ginevra tabularise the andros. The ginevra tabularise the brea. The ginevra pluralise the andros. The victoria is zairese. The victoria leaf the brea. The andros is amphibian. The andros pluralise the ginevra. The andros pluralise the victoria. The brea is consecrate. The brea leaf the andros. If something pluralise the victoria then it is eupneic. If something is nubby then it is zairese. If the brea leaf the victoria then the brea pluralise the andros. If something pluralise the victoria and the victoria tabularise the andros then the victoria pluralise the andros. If something leaf the victoria then the victoria leaf the ginevra. If the brea is nubby and the brea pluralise the andros then the brea leaf the victoria. If something leaf the andros and it leaf the victoria then it leaf the ginevra. All amphibian, eupneic things are nubby. The victoria leaf the brea.", "logic": "\nTabularise(ginevra, andros)\nTabularise(ginevra, brea)\nPluralise(ginevra, andros)\nZairese(victoria)\nLeaf(victoria, brea)\nAmphibian(andros)\nPluralise(andros, ginevra)\nPluralise(andros, victoria)\nConsecrate(brea)\nLeaf(brea, andros)\nforall x (Pluralise(x, victoria) -> Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Zairese(x))\nLeaf(brea, victoria) -> Pluralise(brea, andros)\nforall x (Pluralise(x, victoria) and Tabularise(victoria, andros) -> Pluralise(victoria, andros))\nforall x (Leaf(x, victoria) -> Leaf(victoria, ginevra))\nNubby(brea) and Pluralise(brea, andros) -> Leaf(brea, victoria)\nforall x (Leaf(x, andros) and Leaf(x, victoria) -> Leaf(x, ginevra))\nforall x (Amphibian(x) and Eupneic(x) -> Nubby(x))\n\nLeaf(victoria, brea)\n\ntherefore Leaf(victoria, brea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The annmarie bower the aurea. The annmarie bower the hermina. The annmarie irritate the aurea. The reta is subduable. The reta smear the hermina. The aurea is drenched. The aurea irritate the annmarie. The aurea irritate the reta. The hermina is pronounced. The hermina smear the aurea. If something irritate the reta then it is neglected. If something is mercurial then it is subduable. If the hermina smear the reta then the hermina irritate the aurea. If something irritate the reta and the reta bower the aurea then the reta irritate the aurea. If something smear the reta then the reta smear the annmarie. If the hermina is mercurial and the hermina irritate the aurea then the hermina smear the reta. If something smear the aurea and it smear the reta then it smear the annmarie. All drenched, neglected things are mercurial. The annmarie does not like the aurea.", "logic": "\nBower(annmarie, aurea)\nBower(annmarie, hermina)\nIrritate(annmarie, aurea)\nSubduable(reta)\nSmear(reta, hermina)\nDrenched(aurea)\nIrritate(aurea, annmarie)\nIrritate(aurea, reta)\nPronounced(hermina)\nSmear(hermina, aurea)\nforall x (Irritate(x, reta) -> Neglected(x))\nforall x (Mercurial(x) -> Subduable(x))\nSmear(hermina, reta) -> Irritate(hermina, aurea)\nforall x (Irritate(x, reta) and Bower(reta, aurea) -> Irritate(reta, aurea))\nforall x (Smear(x, reta) -> Smear(reta, annmarie))\nMercurial(hermina) and Irritate(hermina, aurea) -> Smear(hermina, reta)\nforall x (Smear(x, aurea) and Smear(x, reta) -> Smear(x, annmarie))\nforall x (Drenched(x) and Neglected(x) -> Mercurial(x))\n\nnot Irritate(annmarie, aurea)\n\ntherefore Irritate(annmarie, aurea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The simona merit the denni. The simona merit the maggie. The simona backfire the denni. The linda is topping. The linda strip the maggie. The denni is aerated. The denni backfire the simona. The denni backfire the linda. The maggie is seamed. The maggie strip the denni. If something backfire the linda then it is xliv. If something is genitive then it is topping. If the maggie strip the linda then the maggie backfire the denni. If something backfire the linda and the linda merit the denni then the linda backfire the denni. If something strip the linda then the linda strip the simona. If the maggie is genitive and the maggie backfire the denni then the maggie strip the linda. If something strip the denni and it strip the linda then it strip the simona. All aerated, xliv things are genitive. The denni is xliv.", "logic": "\nMerit(simona, denni)\nMerit(simona, maggie)\nBackfire(simona, denni)\nTopping(linda)\nStrip(linda, maggie)\nAerated(denni)\nBackfire(denni, simona)\nBackfire(denni, linda)\nSeamed(maggie)\nStrip(maggie, denni)\nforall x (Backfire(x, linda) -> Xliv(x))\nforall x (Genitive(x) -> Topping(x))\nStrip(maggie, linda) -> Backfire(maggie, denni)\nforall x (Backfire(x, linda) and Merit(linda, denni) -> Backfire(linda, denni))\nforall x (Strip(x, linda) -> Strip(linda, simona))\nGenitive(maggie) and Backfire(maggie, denni) -> Strip(maggie, linda)\nforall x (Strip(x, denni) and Strip(x, linda) -> Strip(x, simona))\nforall x (Aerated(x) and Xliv(x) -> Genitive(x))\n\nXliv(denni)\n\nBackfire(denni, linda) and forall x (Backfire(x, linda) -> Xliv(x)) -> therefore Xliv(denni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The paolina devolve the cathrine. The paolina devolve the stirling. The paolina eliminate the cathrine. The libby is belittling. The libby untwine the stirling. The cathrine is manned. The cathrine eliminate the paolina. The cathrine eliminate the libby. The stirling is guatemalan. The stirling untwine the cathrine. If something eliminate the libby then it is unquiet. If something is foremost then it is belittling. If the stirling untwine the libby then the stirling eliminate the cathrine. If something eliminate the libby and the libby devolve the cathrine then the libby eliminate the cathrine. If something untwine the libby then the libby untwine the paolina. If the stirling is foremost and the stirling eliminate the cathrine then the stirling untwine the libby. If something untwine the cathrine and it untwine the libby then it untwine the paolina. All manned, unquiet things are foremost. The cathrine is not unquiet.", "logic": "\nDevolve(paolina, cathrine)\nDevolve(paolina, stirling)\nEliminate(paolina, cathrine)\nBelittling(libby)\nUntwine(libby, stirling)\nManned(cathrine)\nEliminate(cathrine, paolina)\nEliminate(cathrine, libby)\nGuatemalan(stirling)\nUntwine(stirling, cathrine)\nforall x (Eliminate(x, libby) -> Unquiet(x))\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Belittling(x))\nUntwine(stirling, libby) -> Eliminate(stirling, cathrine)\nforall x (Eliminate(x, libby) and Devolve(libby, cathrine) -> Eliminate(libby, cathrine))\nforall x (Untwine(x, libby) -> Untwine(libby, paolina))\nForemost(stirling) and Eliminate(stirling, cathrine) -> Untwine(stirling, libby)\nforall x (Untwine(x, cathrine) and Untwine(x, libby) -> Untwine(x, paolina))\nforall x (Manned(x) and Unquiet(x) -> Foremost(x))\n\nnot Unquiet(cathrine)\n\nEliminate(cathrine, libby) and forall x (Eliminate(x, libby) -> Unquiet(x)) -> therefore Unquiet(cathrine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The gerda cool the moyna. The gerda cool the abagail. The gerda enforce the moyna. The rivalee is iodinating. The rivalee generate the abagail. The moyna is southeast. The moyna enforce the gerda. The moyna enforce the rivalee. The abagail is virile. The abagail generate the moyna. If something enforce the rivalee then it is reedlike. If something is homoerotic then it is iodinating. If the abagail generate the rivalee then the abagail enforce the moyna. If something enforce the rivalee and the rivalee cool the moyna then the rivalee enforce the moyna. If something generate the rivalee then the rivalee generate the gerda. If the abagail is homoerotic and the abagail enforce the moyna then the abagail generate the rivalee. If something generate the moyna and it generate the rivalee then it generate the gerda. All southeast, reedlike things are homoerotic. The moyna is homoerotic.", "logic": "\nCool(gerda, moyna)\nCool(gerda, abagail)\nEnforce(gerda, moyna)\nIodinating(rivalee)\nGenerate(rivalee, abagail)\nSoutheast(moyna)\nEnforce(moyna, gerda)\nEnforce(moyna, rivalee)\nVirile(abagail)\nGenerate(abagail, moyna)\nforall x (Enforce(x, rivalee) -> Reedlike(x))\nforall x (Homoerotic(x) -> Iodinating(x))\nGenerate(abagail, rivalee) -> Enforce(abagail, moyna)\nforall x (Enforce(x, rivalee) and Cool(rivalee, moyna) -> Enforce(rivalee, moyna))\nforall x (Generate(x, rivalee) -> Generate(rivalee, gerda))\nHomoerotic(abagail) and Enforce(abagail, moyna) -> Generate(abagail, rivalee)\nforall x (Generate(x, moyna) and Generate(x, rivalee) -> Generate(x, gerda))\nforall x (Southeast(x) and Reedlike(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\n\nHomoerotic(moyna)\n\nEnforce(moyna, rivalee) and forall x (Enforce(x, rivalee) -> Reedlike(x)) -> therefore Reedlike(moyna) Southeast(moyna) and Reedlike(moyna) and forall x (Southeast(x) and Reedlike(x) -> Homoerotic(x)) -> therefore Homoerotic(moyna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The kaster bark the conrad. The kaster bark the felicio. The kaster comminute the conrad. The corrinne is mouselike. The corrinne scissor the felicio. The conrad is earthy. The conrad comminute the kaster. The conrad comminute the corrinne. The felicio is crisp. The felicio scissor the conrad. If something comminute the corrinne then it is overawed. If something is tumultuous then it is mouselike. If the felicio scissor the corrinne then the felicio comminute the conrad. If something comminute the corrinne and the corrinne bark the conrad then the corrinne comminute the conrad. If something scissor the corrinne then the corrinne scissor the kaster. If the felicio is tumultuous and the felicio comminute the conrad then the felicio scissor the corrinne. If something scissor the conrad and it scissor the corrinne then it scissor the kaster. All earthy, overawed things are tumultuous. The conrad is not tumultuous.", "logic": "\nBark(kaster, conrad)\nBark(kaster, felicio)\nComminute(kaster, conrad)\nMouselike(corrinne)\nScissor(corrinne, felicio)\nEarthy(conrad)\nComminute(conrad, kaster)\nComminute(conrad, corrinne)\nCrisp(felicio)\nScissor(felicio, conrad)\nforall x (Comminute(x, corrinne) -> Overawed(x))\nforall x (Tumultuous(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nScissor(felicio, corrinne) -> Comminute(felicio, conrad)\nforall x (Comminute(x, corrinne) and Bark(corrinne, conrad) -> Comminute(corrinne, conrad))\nforall x (Scissor(x, corrinne) -> Scissor(corrinne, kaster))\nTumultuous(felicio) and Comminute(felicio, conrad) -> Scissor(felicio, corrinne)\nforall x (Scissor(x, conrad) and Scissor(x, corrinne) -> Scissor(x, kaster))\nforall x (Earthy(x) and Overawed(x) -> Tumultuous(x))\n\nnot Tumultuous(conrad)\n\nComminute(conrad, corrinne) and forall x (Comminute(x, corrinne) -> Overawed(x)) -> therefore Overawed(conrad) Earthy(conrad) and Overawed(conrad) and forall x (Earthy(x) and Overawed(x) -> Tumultuous(x)) -> therefore Tumultuous(conrad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The jackie reward the selestina. The jackie reward the kaleb. The jackie kibosh the selestina. The jayme is shameful. The jayme flip the kaleb. The selestina is completing. The selestina kibosh the jackie. The selestina kibosh the jayme. The kaleb is insurable. The kaleb flip the selestina. If something kibosh the jayme then it is voteless. If something is atrophic then it is shameful. If the kaleb flip the jayme then the kaleb kibosh the selestina. If something kibosh the jayme and the jayme reward the selestina then the jayme kibosh the selestina. If something flip the jayme then the jayme flip the jackie. If the kaleb is atrophic and the kaleb kibosh the selestina then the kaleb flip the jayme. If something flip the selestina and it flip the jayme then it flip the jackie. All completing, voteless things are atrophic. The selestina is shameful.", "logic": "\nReward(jackie, selestina)\nReward(jackie, kaleb)\nKibosh(jackie, selestina)\nShameful(jayme)\nFlip(jayme, kaleb)\nCompleting(selestina)\nKibosh(selestina, jackie)\nKibosh(selestina, jayme)\nInsurable(kaleb)\nFlip(kaleb, selestina)\nforall x (Kibosh(x, jayme) -> Voteless(x))\nforall x (Atrophic(x) -> Shameful(x))\nFlip(kaleb, jayme) -> Kibosh(kaleb, selestina)\nforall x (Kibosh(x, jayme) and Reward(jayme, selestina) -> Kibosh(jayme, selestina))\nforall x (Flip(x, jayme) -> Flip(jayme, jackie))\nAtrophic(kaleb) and Kibosh(kaleb, selestina) -> Flip(kaleb, jayme)\nforall x (Flip(x, selestina) and Flip(x, jayme) -> Flip(x, jackie))\nforall x (Completing(x) and Voteless(x) -> Atrophic(x))\n\nShameful(selestina)\n\nKibosh(selestina, jayme) and forall x (Kibosh(x, jayme) -> Voteless(x)) -> therefore Voteless(selestina) Completing(selestina) and Voteless(selestina) and forall x (Completing(x) and Voteless(x) -> Atrophic(x)) -> therefore Atrophic(selestina) Atrophic(selestina) and forall x (Atrophic(x) -> Shameful(x)) -> therefore Shameful(selestina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The malissia politick the carmen. The malissia politick the angelina. The malissia accomplish the carmen. The isabel is truncated. The isabel syncretise the angelina. The carmen is malefic. The carmen accomplish the malissia. The carmen accomplish the isabel. The angelina is unstable. The angelina syncretise the carmen. If something accomplish the isabel then it is potbellied. If something is bluish then it is truncated. If the angelina syncretise the isabel then the angelina accomplish the carmen. If something accomplish the isabel and the isabel politick the carmen then the isabel accomplish the carmen. If something syncretise the isabel then the isabel syncretise the malissia. If the angelina is bluish and the angelina accomplish the carmen then the angelina syncretise the isabel. If something syncretise the carmen and it syncretise the isabel then it syncretise the malissia. All malefic, potbellied things are bluish. The carmen is not truncated.", "logic": "\nPolitick(malissia, carmen)\nPolitick(malissia, angelina)\nAccomplish(malissia, carmen)\nTruncated(isabel)\nSyncretise(isabel, angelina)\nMalefic(carmen)\nAccomplish(carmen, malissia)\nAccomplish(carmen, isabel)\nUnstable(angelina)\nSyncretise(angelina, carmen)\nforall x (Accomplish(x, isabel) -> Potbellied(x))\nforall x (Bluish(x) -> Truncated(x))\nSyncretise(angelina, isabel) -> Accomplish(angelina, carmen)\nforall x (Accomplish(x, isabel) and Politick(isabel, carmen) -> Accomplish(isabel, carmen))\nforall x (Syncretise(x, isabel) -> Syncretise(isabel, malissia))\nBluish(angelina) and Accomplish(angelina, carmen) -> Syncretise(angelina, isabel)\nforall x (Syncretise(x, carmen) and Syncretise(x, isabel) -> Syncretise(x, malissia))\nforall x (Malefic(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Bluish(x))\n\nnot Truncated(carmen)\n\nAccomplish(carmen, isabel) and forall x (Accomplish(x, isabel) -> Potbellied(x)) -> therefore Potbellied(carmen) Malefic(carmen) and Potbellied(carmen) and forall x (Malefic(x) and Potbellied(x) -> Bluish(x)) -> therefore Bluish(carmen) Bluish(carmen) and forall x (Bluish(x) -> Truncated(x)) -> therefore Truncated(carmen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The karyl commend the jeannine. The karyl commend the timothea. The karyl tarry the jeannine. The moselle is hostile. The moselle forfend the timothea. The jeannine is fuzzed. The jeannine tarry the karyl. The jeannine tarry the moselle. The timothea is quilted. The timothea forfend the jeannine. If something tarry the moselle then it is deformed. If something is nonunion then it is hostile. If the timothea forfend the moselle then the timothea tarry the jeannine. If something tarry the moselle and the moselle commend the jeannine then the moselle tarry the jeannine. If something forfend the moselle then the moselle forfend the karyl. If the timothea is nonunion and the timothea tarry the jeannine then the timothea forfend the moselle. If something forfend the jeannine and it forfend the moselle then it forfend the karyl. All fuzzed, deformed things are nonunion. The moselle does not visit the karyl.", "logic": "\nCommend(karyl, jeannine)\nCommend(karyl, timothea)\nTarry(karyl, jeannine)\nHostile(moselle)\nForfend(moselle, timothea)\nFuzzed(jeannine)\nTarry(jeannine, karyl)\nTarry(jeannine, moselle)\nQuilted(timothea)\nForfend(timothea, jeannine)\nforall x (Tarry(x, moselle) -> Deformed(x))\nforall x (Nonunion(x) -> Hostile(x))\nForfend(timothea, moselle) -> Tarry(timothea, jeannine)\nforall x (Tarry(x, moselle) and Commend(moselle, jeannine) -> Tarry(moselle, jeannine))\nforall x (Forfend(x, moselle) -> Forfend(moselle, karyl))\nNonunion(timothea) and Tarry(timothea, jeannine) -> Forfend(timothea, moselle)\nforall x (Forfend(x, jeannine) and Forfend(x, moselle) -> Forfend(x, karyl))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Deformed(x) -> Nonunion(x))\n\nnot Forfend(moselle, karyl)\n\nforall x (Forfend(x, moselle) -> Forfend(moselle, karyl)) <- Nonunion(timothea) and Tarry(timothea, jeannine) -> Forfend(timothea, moselle) <- forall x (Fuzzed(x) and Deformed(x) -> Nonunion(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The chas bedamn the jacklin. The chas bedamn the irving. The chas smother the jacklin. The coleen is zygotic. The coleen tithe the irving. The jacklin is straight. The jacklin smother the chas. The jacklin smother the coleen. The irving is transpolar. The irving tithe the jacklin. If something smother the coleen then it is cultivated. If something is platonic then it is zygotic. If the irving tithe the coleen then the irving smother the jacklin. If something smother the coleen and the coleen bedamn the jacklin then the coleen smother the jacklin. If something tithe the coleen then the coleen tithe the chas. If the irving is platonic and the irving smother the jacklin then the irving tithe the coleen. If something tithe the jacklin and it tithe the coleen then it tithe the chas. All straight, cultivated things are platonic. The coleen is platonic.", "logic": "\nBedamn(chas, jacklin)\nBedamn(chas, irving)\nSmother(chas, jacklin)\nZygotic(coleen)\nTithe(coleen, irving)\nStraight(jacklin)\nSmother(jacklin, chas)\nSmother(jacklin, coleen)\nTranspolar(irving)\nTithe(irving, jacklin)\nforall x (Smother(x, coleen) -> Cultivated(x))\nforall x (Platonic(x) -> Zygotic(x))\nTithe(irving, coleen) -> Smother(irving, jacklin)\nforall x (Smother(x, coleen) and Bedamn(coleen, jacklin) -> Smother(coleen, jacklin))\nforall x (Tithe(x, coleen) -> Tithe(coleen, chas))\nPlatonic(irving) and Smother(irving, jacklin) -> Tithe(irving, coleen)\nforall x (Tithe(x, jacklin) and Tithe(x, coleen) -> Tithe(x, chas))\nforall x (Straight(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Platonic(x))\n\nPlatonic(coleen)\n\nforall x (Straight(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Platonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The dyann prune the charis. The dyann prune the birgit. The dyann cast the charis. The charyl is unexploded. The charyl reproof the birgit. The charis is starchless. The charis cast the dyann. The charis cast the charyl. The birgit is pelvic. The birgit reproof the charis. If something cast the charyl then it is eager. If something is exoergic then it is unexploded. If the birgit reproof the charyl then the birgit cast the charis. If something cast the charyl and the charyl prune the charis then the charyl cast the charis. If something reproof the charyl then the charyl reproof the dyann. If the birgit is exoergic and the birgit cast the charis then the birgit reproof the charyl. If something reproof the charis and it reproof the charyl then it reproof the dyann. All starchless, eager things are exoergic. The charis does not visit the dyann.", "logic": "\nPrune(dyann, charis)\nPrune(dyann, birgit)\nCast(dyann, charis)\nUnexploded(charyl)\nReproof(charyl, birgit)\nStarchless(charis)\nCast(charis, dyann)\nCast(charis, charyl)\nPelvic(birgit)\nReproof(birgit, charis)\nforall x (Cast(x, charyl) -> Eager(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Unexploded(x))\nReproof(birgit, charyl) -> Cast(birgit, charis)\nforall x (Cast(x, charyl) and Prune(charyl, charis) -> Cast(charyl, charis))\nforall x (Reproof(x, charyl) -> Reproof(charyl, dyann))\nExoergic(birgit) and Cast(birgit, charis) -> Reproof(birgit, charyl)\nforall x (Reproof(x, charis) and Reproof(x, charyl) -> Reproof(x, dyann))\nforall x (Starchless(x) and Eager(x) -> Exoergic(x))\n\nnot Reproof(charis, dyann)\n\nforall x (Reproof(x, charis) and Reproof(x, charyl) -> Reproof(x, dyann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The pollyanna sedate the ellen. The pollyanna sedate the rycca. The pollyanna exempt the ellen. The ulrica is contorted. The ulrica enrobe the rycca. The ellen is plaguy. The ellen exempt the pollyanna. The ellen exempt the ulrica. The rycca is unmerited. The rycca enrobe the ellen. If something exempt the ulrica then it is zymotic. If something is acidic then it is contorted. If the rycca enrobe the ulrica then the rycca exempt the ellen. If something exempt the ulrica and the ulrica sedate the ellen then the ulrica exempt the ellen. If something enrobe the ulrica then the ulrica enrobe the pollyanna. If the rycca is acidic and the rycca exempt the ellen then the rycca enrobe the ulrica. If something enrobe the ellen and it enrobe the ulrica then it enrobe the pollyanna. All plaguy, zymotic things are acidic. The rycca is zymotic.", "logic": "\nSedate(pollyanna, ellen)\nSedate(pollyanna, rycca)\nExempt(pollyanna, ellen)\nContorted(ulrica)\nEnrobe(ulrica, rycca)\nPlaguy(ellen)\nExempt(ellen, pollyanna)\nExempt(ellen, ulrica)\nUnmerited(rycca)\nEnrobe(rycca, ellen)\nforall x (Exempt(x, ulrica) -> Zymotic(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Contorted(x))\nEnrobe(rycca, ulrica) -> Exempt(rycca, ellen)\nforall x (Exempt(x, ulrica) and Sedate(ulrica, ellen) -> Exempt(ulrica, ellen))\nforall x (Enrobe(x, ulrica) -> Enrobe(ulrica, pollyanna))\nAcidic(rycca) and Exempt(rycca, ellen) -> Enrobe(rycca, ulrica)\nforall x (Enrobe(x, ellen) and Enrobe(x, ulrica) -> Enrobe(x, pollyanna))\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and Zymotic(x) -> Acidic(x))\n\nZymotic(rycca)\n\nforall x (Exempt(x, ulrica) -> Zymotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The cristina speciate the carmel. The cristina speciate the dewey. The cristina blindside the carmel. The ambur is danish. The ambur crest the dewey. The carmel is dressy. The carmel blindside the cristina. The carmel blindside the ambur. The dewey is certified. The dewey crest the carmel. If something blindside the ambur then it is prudent. If something is aerolitic then it is danish. If the dewey crest the ambur then the dewey blindside the carmel. If something blindside the ambur and the ambur speciate the carmel then the ambur blindside the carmel. If something crest the ambur then the ambur crest the cristina. If the dewey is aerolitic and the dewey blindside the carmel then the dewey crest the ambur. If something crest the carmel and it crest the ambur then it crest the cristina. All dressy, prudent things are aerolitic. The ambur is not certified.", "logic": "\nSpeciate(cristina, carmel)\nSpeciate(cristina, dewey)\nBlindside(cristina, carmel)\nDanish(ambur)\nCrest(ambur, dewey)\nDressy(carmel)\nBlindside(carmel, cristina)\nBlindside(carmel, ambur)\nCertified(dewey)\nCrest(dewey, carmel)\nforall x (Blindside(x, ambur) -> Prudent(x))\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Danish(x))\nCrest(dewey, ambur) -> Blindside(dewey, carmel)\nforall x (Blindside(x, ambur) and Speciate(ambur, carmel) -> Blindside(ambur, carmel))\nforall x (Crest(x, ambur) -> Crest(ambur, cristina))\nAerolitic(dewey) and Blindside(dewey, carmel) -> Crest(dewey, ambur)\nforall x (Crest(x, carmel) and Crest(x, ambur) -> Crest(x, cristina))\nforall x (Dressy(x) and Prudent(x) -> Aerolitic(x))\n\nnot Certified(ambur)\n\nnot Certified(ambur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The lavina scuffle the roxana. The lavina scuffle the koralle. The lavina mismate the roxana. The charisse is unusable. The charisse concur the koralle. The roxana is productive. The roxana mismate the lavina. The roxana mismate the charisse. The koralle is eellike. The koralle concur the roxana. If something mismate the charisse then it is sheared. If something is adorable then it is unusable. If the koralle concur the charisse then the koralle mismate the roxana. If something mismate the charisse and the charisse scuffle the roxana then the charisse mismate the roxana. If something concur the charisse then the charisse concur the lavina. If the koralle is adorable and the koralle mismate the roxana then the koralle concur the charisse. If something concur the roxana and it concur the charisse then it concur the lavina. All productive, sheared things are adorable. The koralle scuffle the roxana.", "logic": "\nScuffle(lavina, roxana)\nScuffle(lavina, koralle)\nMismate(lavina, roxana)\nUnusable(charisse)\nConcur(charisse, koralle)\nProductive(roxana)\nMismate(roxana, lavina)\nMismate(roxana, charisse)\nEellike(koralle)\nConcur(koralle, roxana)\nforall x (Mismate(x, charisse) -> Sheared(x))\nforall x (Adorable(x) -> Unusable(x))\nConcur(koralle, charisse) -> Mismate(koralle, roxana)\nforall x (Mismate(x, charisse) and Scuffle(charisse, roxana) -> Mismate(charisse, roxana))\nforall x (Concur(x, charisse) -> Concur(charisse, lavina))\nAdorable(koralle) and Mismate(koralle, roxana) -> Concur(koralle, charisse)\nforall x (Concur(x, roxana) and Concur(x, charisse) -> Concur(x, lavina))\nforall x (Productive(x) and Sheared(x) -> Adorable(x))\n\nScuffle(koralle, roxana)\n\nScuffle(koralle, roxana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The lotti carom the marten. The lotti carom the felisha. The lotti unhand the marten. The jacintha is dependable. The jacintha patch the felisha. The marten is bats. The marten unhand the lotti. The marten unhand the jacintha. The felisha is steep. The felisha patch the marten. If something unhand the jacintha then it is acquainted. If something is mincing then it is dependable. If the felisha patch the jacintha then the felisha unhand the marten. If something unhand the jacintha and the jacintha carom the marten then the jacintha unhand the marten. If something patch the jacintha then the jacintha patch the lotti. If the felisha is mincing and the felisha unhand the marten then the felisha patch the jacintha. If something patch the marten and it patch the jacintha then it patch the lotti. All bats, acquainted things are mincing. The marten does not visit the jacintha.", "logic": "\nCarom(lotti, marten)\nCarom(lotti, felisha)\nUnhand(lotti, marten)\nDependable(jacintha)\nPatch(jacintha, felisha)\nBats(marten)\nUnhand(marten, lotti)\nUnhand(marten, jacintha)\nSteep(felisha)\nPatch(felisha, marten)\nforall x (Unhand(x, jacintha) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Mincing(x) -> Dependable(x))\nPatch(felisha, jacintha) -> Unhand(felisha, marten)\nforall x (Unhand(x, jacintha) and Carom(jacintha, marten) -> Unhand(jacintha, marten))\nforall x (Patch(x, jacintha) -> Patch(jacintha, lotti))\nMincing(felisha) and Unhand(felisha, marten) -> Patch(felisha, jacintha)\nforall x (Patch(x, marten) and Patch(x, jacintha) -> Patch(x, lotti))\nforall x (Bats(x) and Acquainted(x) -> Mincing(x))\n\nnot Patch(marten, jacintha)\n\nnot Patch(marten, jacintha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The kimmi astound the rozelle. The kimmi astound the irvine. The kimmi misgovern the rozelle. The eva is blowzy. The eva figure the irvine. The rozelle is univalent. The rozelle misgovern the kimmi. The rozelle misgovern the eva. The irvine is artistic. The irvine figure the rozelle. If something misgovern the eva then it is lascivious. If something is unlatched then it is blowzy. If the irvine figure the eva then the irvine misgovern the rozelle. If something misgovern the eva and the eva astound the rozelle then the eva misgovern the rozelle. If something figure the eva then the eva figure the kimmi. If the irvine is unlatched and the irvine misgovern the rozelle then the irvine figure the eva. If something figure the rozelle and it figure the eva then it figure the kimmi. All univalent, lascivious things are unlatched. The irvine astound the kimmi.", "logic": "\nAstound(kimmi, rozelle)\nAstound(kimmi, irvine)\nMisgovern(kimmi, rozelle)\nBlowzy(eva)\nFigure(eva, irvine)\nUnivalent(rozelle)\nMisgovern(rozelle, kimmi)\nMisgovern(rozelle, eva)\nArtistic(irvine)\nFigure(irvine, rozelle)\nforall x (Misgovern(x, eva) -> Lascivious(x))\nforall x (Unlatched(x) -> Blowzy(x))\nFigure(irvine, eva) -> Misgovern(irvine, rozelle)\nforall x (Misgovern(x, eva) and Astound(eva, rozelle) -> Misgovern(eva, rozelle))\nforall x (Figure(x, eva) -> Figure(eva, kimmi))\nUnlatched(irvine) and Misgovern(irvine, rozelle) -> Figure(irvine, eva)\nforall x (Figure(x, rozelle) and Figure(x, eva) -> Figure(x, kimmi))\nforall x (Univalent(x) and Lascivious(x) -> Unlatched(x))\n\nAstound(irvine, kimmi)\n\nAstound(irvine, kimmi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1290"} {"premises": "The sydney cakewalk the cybal. The sydney is bedraggled. The sydney is dreamlike. The sydney foot the cybal. The sydney gamble the cybal. The cybal is attenuate. The cybal is diabatic. If someone gamble the cybal and the cybal is diabatic then they need the sydney. The cybal is diabatic.", "logic": "\nCakewalk(sydney, cybal)\nBedraggled(sydney)\nDreamlike(sydney)\nFoot(sydney, cybal)\nGamble(sydney, cybal)\nAttenuate(cybal)\nDiabatic(cybal)\nforall x (Gamble(x, cybal) and Diabatic(cybal) -> Foot(x, sydney))\n\nDiabatic(cybal)\n\ntherefore Diabatic(cybal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5956"} {"premises": "The shem arbitrage the theresina. The shem is mirthful. The shem is disarming. The shem secularise the theresina. The shem heighten the theresina. The theresina is antidotal. The theresina is tatty. If someone heighten the theresina and the theresina is tatty then they need the shem. The shem does not need the theresina.", "logic": "\nArbitrage(shem, theresina)\nMirthful(shem)\nDisarming(shem)\nSecularise(shem, theresina)\nHeighten(shem, theresina)\nAntidotal(theresina)\nTatty(theresina)\nforall x (Heighten(x, theresina) and Tatty(theresina) -> Secularise(x, shem))\n\nnot Secularise(shem, theresina)\n\ntherefore Secularise(shem, theresina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5956"} {"premises": "The archy quantify the theda. The archy is reproving. The archy is holistic. The archy embrittle the theda. The archy forest the theda. The theda is pointless. The theda is astylar. If someone forest the theda and the theda is astylar then they need the archy. The theda does not need the archy.", "logic": "\nQuantify(archy, theda)\nReproving(archy)\nHolistic(archy)\nEmbrittle(archy, theda)\nForest(archy, theda)\nPointless(theda)\nAstylar(theda)\nforall x (Forest(x, theda) and Astylar(theda) -> Embrittle(x, archy))\n\nnot Embrittle(theda, archy)\n\nforall x (Forest(x, theda) and Astylar(theda) -> Embrittle(x, archy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5956"} {"premises": "The dasya criminate the layne. The dasya is broached. The dasya is inflamed. The dasya disgrace the layne. The dasya camber the layne. The layne is brushy. The layne is discreet. If someone camber the layne and the layne is discreet then they need the dasya. The layne camber the dasya.", "logic": "\nCriminate(dasya, layne)\nBroached(dasya)\nInflamed(dasya)\nDisgrace(dasya, layne)\nCamber(dasya, layne)\nBrushy(layne)\nDiscreet(layne)\nforall x (Camber(x, layne) and Discreet(layne) -> Disgrace(x, dasya))\n\nCamber(layne, dasya)\n\nCamber(layne, dasya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5956"} {"premises": "The vonni plot the rajeev. The vonni plot the annmarie. The vonni is wakeless. The vonni coke the rajeev. The vonni coke the annmarie. The rajeev plot the vonni. The rajeev plot the annmarie. The rajeev is sugarless. The rajeev pyramid the vonni. The rajeev pyramid the annmarie. The rajeev coke the annmarie. The annmarie is sugarless. The annmarie is undismayed. The annmarie pyramid the rajeev. The annmarie coke the vonni. The annmarie coke the rajeev. If someone plot the rajeev and they need the annmarie then the rajeev plot the vonni. If someone is wolflike and they chase the annmarie then they need the vonni. If someone pyramid the vonni then they chase the rajeev. If someone plot the rajeev and they see the rajeev then they need the annmarie. Young, sugarless people are eurasiatic. If someone plot the vonni and the vonni pyramid the annmarie then they are sugarless. If someone is eurasiatic then they need the vonni. If someone coke the rajeev then the rajeev plot the vonni. The vonni coke the annmarie.", "logic": "\nPlot(vonni, rajeev)\nPlot(vonni, annmarie)\nWakeless(vonni)\nCoke(vonni, rajeev)\nCoke(vonni, annmarie)\nPlot(rajeev, vonni)\nPlot(rajeev, annmarie)\nSugarless(rajeev)\nPyramid(rajeev, vonni)\nPyramid(rajeev, annmarie)\nCoke(rajeev, annmarie)\nSugarless(annmarie)\nUndismayed(annmarie)\nPyramid(annmarie, rajeev)\nCoke(annmarie, vonni)\nCoke(annmarie, rajeev)\nforall x (Plot(x, rajeev) and Pyramid(x, annmarie) -> Plot(rajeev, vonni))\nforall x (Wolflike(x) and Plot(x, annmarie) -> Pyramid(x, vonni))\nforall x (Pyramid(x, vonni) -> Plot(x, rajeev))\nforall x (Plot(x, rajeev) and Coke(x, rajeev) -> Pyramid(x, annmarie))\nforall x (Undismayed(x) and Sugarless(x) -> Eurasiatic(x))\nforall x (Plot(x, vonni) and Pyramid(vonni, annmarie) -> Sugarless(x))\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) -> Pyramid(x, vonni))\nforall x (Coke(x, rajeev) -> Plot(rajeev, vonni))\n\nCoke(vonni, annmarie)\n\ntherefore Coke(vonni, annmarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The ronna brunch the fania. The ronna brunch the horatius. The ronna is illegible. The ronna reset the fania. The ronna reset the horatius. The fania brunch the ronna. The fania brunch the horatius. The fania is teary. The fania disengage the ronna. The fania disengage the horatius. The fania reset the horatius. The horatius is teary. The horatius is linear. The horatius disengage the fania. The horatius reset the ronna. The horatius reset the fania. If someone brunch the fania and they need the horatius then the fania brunch the ronna. If someone is biliary and they chase the horatius then they need the ronna. If someone disengage the ronna then they chase the fania. If someone brunch the fania and they see the fania then they need the horatius. Young, teary people are reduced. If someone brunch the ronna and the ronna disengage the horatius then they are teary. If someone is reduced then they need the ronna. If someone reset the fania then the fania brunch the ronna. The fania does not see the horatius.", "logic": "\nBrunch(ronna, fania)\nBrunch(ronna, horatius)\nIllegible(ronna)\nReset(ronna, fania)\nReset(ronna, horatius)\nBrunch(fania, ronna)\nBrunch(fania, horatius)\nTeary(fania)\nDisengage(fania, ronna)\nDisengage(fania, horatius)\nReset(fania, horatius)\nTeary(horatius)\nLinear(horatius)\nDisengage(horatius, fania)\nReset(horatius, ronna)\nReset(horatius, fania)\nforall x (Brunch(x, fania) and Disengage(x, horatius) -> Brunch(fania, ronna))\nforall x (Biliary(x) and Brunch(x, horatius) -> Disengage(x, ronna))\nforall x (Disengage(x, ronna) -> Brunch(x, fania))\nforall x (Brunch(x, fania) and Reset(x, fania) -> Disengage(x, horatius))\nforall x (Linear(x) and Teary(x) -> Reduced(x))\nforall x (Brunch(x, ronna) and Disengage(ronna, horatius) -> Teary(x))\nforall x (Reduced(x) -> Disengage(x, ronna))\nforall x (Reset(x, fania) -> Brunch(fania, ronna))\n\nnot Reset(fania, horatius)\n\ntherefore Reset(fania, horatius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The roderigo felt the laurene. The roderigo felt the myranda. The roderigo is antitrust. The roderigo impress the laurene. The roderigo impress the myranda. The laurene felt the roderigo. The laurene felt the myranda. The laurene is powerless. The laurene stooge the roderigo. The laurene stooge the myranda. The laurene impress the myranda. The myranda is powerless. The myranda is unenclosed. The myranda stooge the laurene. The myranda impress the roderigo. The myranda impress the laurene. If someone felt the laurene and they need the myranda then the laurene felt the roderigo. If someone is discursive and they chase the myranda then they need the roderigo. If someone stooge the roderigo then they chase the laurene. If someone felt the laurene and they see the laurene then they need the myranda. Young, powerless people are moldable. If someone felt the roderigo and the roderigo stooge the myranda then they are powerless. If someone is moldable then they need the roderigo. If someone impress the laurene then the laurene felt the roderigo. The roderigo stooge the myranda.", "logic": "\nFelt(roderigo, laurene)\nFelt(roderigo, myranda)\nAntitrust(roderigo)\nImpress(roderigo, laurene)\nImpress(roderigo, myranda)\nFelt(laurene, roderigo)\nFelt(laurene, myranda)\nPowerless(laurene)\nStooge(laurene, roderigo)\nStooge(laurene, myranda)\nImpress(laurene, myranda)\nPowerless(myranda)\nUnenclosed(myranda)\nStooge(myranda, laurene)\nImpress(myranda, roderigo)\nImpress(myranda, laurene)\nforall x (Felt(x, laurene) and Stooge(x, myranda) -> Felt(laurene, roderigo))\nforall x (Discursive(x) and Felt(x, myranda) -> Stooge(x, roderigo))\nforall x (Stooge(x, roderigo) -> Felt(x, laurene))\nforall x (Felt(x, laurene) and Impress(x, laurene) -> Stooge(x, myranda))\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) and Powerless(x) -> Moldable(x))\nforall x (Felt(x, roderigo) and Stooge(roderigo, myranda) -> Powerless(x))\nforall x (Moldable(x) -> Stooge(x, roderigo))\nforall x (Impress(x, laurene) -> Felt(laurene, roderigo))\n\nStooge(roderigo, myranda)\n\nFelt(roderigo, laurene) and Impress(roderigo, laurene) and forall x (Felt(x, laurene) and Impress(x, laurene) -> Stooge(x, myranda)) -> therefore Stooge(roderigo, myranda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The meira muss the roobbie. The meira muss the bunny. The meira is false. The meira annunciate the roobbie. The meira annunciate the bunny. The roobbie muss the meira. The roobbie muss the bunny. The roobbie is acceptive. The roobbie quiet the meira. The roobbie quiet the bunny. The roobbie annunciate the bunny. The bunny is acceptive. The bunny is diminished. The bunny quiet the roobbie. The bunny annunciate the meira. The bunny annunciate the roobbie. If someone muss the roobbie and they need the bunny then the roobbie muss the meira. If someone is peaky and they chase the bunny then they need the meira. If someone quiet the meira then they chase the roobbie. If someone muss the roobbie and they see the roobbie then they need the bunny. Young, acceptive people are unsorted. If someone muss the meira and the meira quiet the bunny then they are acceptive. If someone is unsorted then they need the meira. If someone annunciate the roobbie then the roobbie muss the meira. The meira does not need the bunny.", "logic": "\nMuss(meira, roobbie)\nMuss(meira, bunny)\nFalse(meira)\nAnnunciate(meira, roobbie)\nAnnunciate(meira, bunny)\nMuss(roobbie, meira)\nMuss(roobbie, bunny)\nAcceptive(roobbie)\nQuiet(roobbie, meira)\nQuiet(roobbie, bunny)\nAnnunciate(roobbie, bunny)\nAcceptive(bunny)\nDiminished(bunny)\nQuiet(bunny, roobbie)\nAnnunciate(bunny, meira)\nAnnunciate(bunny, roobbie)\nforall x (Muss(x, roobbie) and Quiet(x, bunny) -> Muss(roobbie, meira))\nforall x (Peaky(x) and Muss(x, bunny) -> Quiet(x, meira))\nforall x (Quiet(x, meira) -> Muss(x, roobbie))\nforall x (Muss(x, roobbie) and Annunciate(x, roobbie) -> Quiet(x, bunny))\nforall x (Diminished(x) and Acceptive(x) -> Unsorted(x))\nforall x (Muss(x, meira) and Quiet(meira, bunny) -> Acceptive(x))\nforall x (Unsorted(x) -> Quiet(x, meira))\nforall x (Annunciate(x, roobbie) -> Muss(roobbie, meira))\n\nnot Quiet(meira, bunny)\n\nMuss(meira, roobbie) and Annunciate(meira, roobbie) and forall x (Muss(x, roobbie) and Annunciate(x, roobbie) -> Quiet(x, bunny)) -> therefore Quiet(meira, bunny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The sayre abate the sheff. The sayre abate the florencia. The sayre is sterilized. The sayre twang the sheff. The sayre twang the florencia. The sheff abate the sayre. The sheff abate the florencia. The sheff is chaotic. The sheff discolour the sayre. The sheff discolour the florencia. The sheff twang the florencia. The florencia is chaotic. The florencia is scaleless. The florencia discolour the sheff. The florencia twang the sayre. The florencia twang the sheff. If someone abate the sheff and they need the florencia then the sheff abate the sayre. If someone is amended and they chase the florencia then they need the sayre. If someone discolour the sayre then they chase the sheff. If someone abate the sheff and they see the sheff then they need the florencia. Young, chaotic people are accordant. If someone abate the sayre and the sayre discolour the florencia then they are chaotic. If someone is accordant then they need the sayre. If someone twang the sheff then the sheff abate the sayre. The florencia discolour the sayre.", "logic": "\nAbate(sayre, sheff)\nAbate(sayre, florencia)\nSterilized(sayre)\nTwang(sayre, sheff)\nTwang(sayre, florencia)\nAbate(sheff, sayre)\nAbate(sheff, florencia)\nChaotic(sheff)\nDiscolour(sheff, sayre)\nDiscolour(sheff, florencia)\nTwang(sheff, florencia)\nChaotic(florencia)\nScaleless(florencia)\nDiscolour(florencia, sheff)\nTwang(florencia, sayre)\nTwang(florencia, sheff)\nforall x (Abate(x, sheff) and Discolour(x, florencia) -> Abate(sheff, sayre))\nforall x (Amended(x) and Abate(x, florencia) -> Discolour(x, sayre))\nforall x (Discolour(x, sayre) -> Abate(x, sheff))\nforall x (Abate(x, sheff) and Twang(x, sheff) -> Discolour(x, florencia))\nforall x (Scaleless(x) and Chaotic(x) -> Accordant(x))\nforall x (Abate(x, sayre) and Discolour(sayre, florencia) -> Chaotic(x))\nforall x (Accordant(x) -> Discolour(x, sayre))\nforall x (Twang(x, sheff) -> Abate(sheff, sayre))\n\nDiscolour(florencia, sayre)\n\nScaleless(florencia) and Chaotic(florencia) and forall x (Scaleless(x) and Chaotic(x) -> Accordant(x)) -> therefore Accordant(florencia) Accordant(florencia) and forall x (Accordant(x) -> Discolour(x, sayre)) -> therefore Discolour(florencia, sayre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The brandais elude the bharat. The brandais elude the norean. The brandais is grizzled. The brandais vindicate the bharat. The brandais vindicate the norean. The bharat elude the brandais. The bharat elude the norean. The bharat is asserted. The bharat budge the brandais. The bharat budge the norean. The bharat vindicate the norean. The norean is asserted. The norean is excusable. The norean budge the bharat. The norean vindicate the brandais. The norean vindicate the bharat. If someone elude the bharat and they need the norean then the bharat elude the brandais. If someone is fugly and they chase the norean then they need the brandais. If someone budge the brandais then they chase the bharat. If someone elude the bharat and they see the bharat then they need the norean. Young, asserted people are absorbing. If someone elude the brandais and the brandais budge the norean then they are asserted. If someone is absorbing then they need the brandais. If someone vindicate the bharat then the bharat elude the brandais. The norean does not need the brandais.", "logic": "\nElude(brandais, bharat)\nElude(brandais, norean)\nGrizzled(brandais)\nVindicate(brandais, bharat)\nVindicate(brandais, norean)\nElude(bharat, brandais)\nElude(bharat, norean)\nAsserted(bharat)\nBudge(bharat, brandais)\nBudge(bharat, norean)\nVindicate(bharat, norean)\nAsserted(norean)\nExcusable(norean)\nBudge(norean, bharat)\nVindicate(norean, brandais)\nVindicate(norean, bharat)\nforall x (Elude(x, bharat) and Budge(x, norean) -> Elude(bharat, brandais))\nforall x (Fugly(x) and Elude(x, norean) -> Budge(x, brandais))\nforall x (Budge(x, brandais) -> Elude(x, bharat))\nforall x (Elude(x, bharat) and Vindicate(x, bharat) -> Budge(x, norean))\nforall x (Excusable(x) and Asserted(x) -> Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Elude(x, brandais) and Budge(brandais, norean) -> Asserted(x))\nforall x (Absorbing(x) -> Budge(x, brandais))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, bharat) -> Elude(bharat, brandais))\n\nnot Budge(norean, brandais)\n\nExcusable(norean) and Asserted(norean) and forall x (Excusable(x) and Asserted(x) -> Absorbing(x)) -> therefore Absorbing(norean) Absorbing(norean) and forall x (Absorbing(x) -> Budge(x, brandais)) -> therefore Budge(norean, brandais)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The fawn punch the iain. The fawn punch the shawnee. The fawn is snarly. The fawn bloviate the iain. The fawn bloviate the shawnee. The iain punch the fawn. The iain punch the shawnee. The iain is musky. The iain larn the fawn. The iain larn the shawnee. The iain bloviate the shawnee. The shawnee is musky. The shawnee is quaternary. The shawnee larn the iain. The shawnee bloviate the fawn. The shawnee bloviate the iain. If someone punch the iain and they need the shawnee then the iain punch the fawn. If someone is bilious and they chase the shawnee then they need the fawn. If someone larn the fawn then they chase the iain. If someone punch the iain and they see the iain then they need the shawnee. Young, musky people are coital. If someone punch the fawn and the fawn larn the shawnee then they are musky. If someone is coital then they need the fawn. If someone bloviate the iain then the iain punch the fawn. The shawnee punch the iain.", "logic": "\nPunch(fawn, iain)\nPunch(fawn, shawnee)\nSnarly(fawn)\nBloviate(fawn, iain)\nBloviate(fawn, shawnee)\nPunch(iain, fawn)\nPunch(iain, shawnee)\nMusky(iain)\nLarn(iain, fawn)\nLarn(iain, shawnee)\nBloviate(iain, shawnee)\nMusky(shawnee)\nQuaternary(shawnee)\nLarn(shawnee, iain)\nBloviate(shawnee, fawn)\nBloviate(shawnee, iain)\nforall x (Punch(x, iain) and Larn(x, shawnee) -> Punch(iain, fawn))\nforall x (Bilious(x) and Punch(x, shawnee) -> Larn(x, fawn))\nforall x (Larn(x, fawn) -> Punch(x, iain))\nforall x (Punch(x, iain) and Bloviate(x, iain) -> Larn(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Quaternary(x) and Musky(x) -> Coital(x))\nforall x (Punch(x, fawn) and Larn(fawn, shawnee) -> Musky(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) -> Larn(x, fawn))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, iain) -> Punch(iain, fawn))\n\nPunch(shawnee, iain)\n\nQuaternary(shawnee) and Musky(shawnee) and forall x (Quaternary(x) and Musky(x) -> Coital(x)) -> therefore Coital(shawnee) Coital(shawnee) and forall x (Coital(x) -> Larn(x, fawn)) -> therefore Larn(shawnee, fawn) Larn(shawnee, fawn) and forall x (Larn(x, fawn) -> Punch(x, iain)) -> therefore Punch(shawnee, iain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The gordon whirr the ethelbert. The gordon whirr the jermayne. The gordon is scaly. The gordon gain the ethelbert. The gordon gain the jermayne. The ethelbert whirr the gordon. The ethelbert whirr the jermayne. The ethelbert is alive. The ethelbert strap the gordon. The ethelbert strap the jermayne. The ethelbert gain the jermayne. The jermayne is alive. The jermayne is mozartean. The jermayne strap the ethelbert. The jermayne gain the gordon. The jermayne gain the ethelbert. If someone whirr the ethelbert and they need the jermayne then the ethelbert whirr the gordon. If someone is elliptic and they chase the jermayne then they need the gordon. If someone strap the gordon then they chase the ethelbert. If someone whirr the ethelbert and they see the ethelbert then they need the jermayne. Young, alive people are marooned. If someone whirr the gordon and the gordon strap the jermayne then they are alive. If someone is marooned then they need the gordon. If someone gain the ethelbert then the ethelbert whirr the gordon. The jermayne does not chase the ethelbert.", "logic": "\nWhirr(gordon, ethelbert)\nWhirr(gordon, jermayne)\nScaly(gordon)\nGain(gordon, ethelbert)\nGain(gordon, jermayne)\nWhirr(ethelbert, gordon)\nWhirr(ethelbert, jermayne)\nAlive(ethelbert)\nStrap(ethelbert, gordon)\nStrap(ethelbert, jermayne)\nGain(ethelbert, jermayne)\nAlive(jermayne)\nMozartean(jermayne)\nStrap(jermayne, ethelbert)\nGain(jermayne, gordon)\nGain(jermayne, ethelbert)\nforall x (Whirr(x, ethelbert) and Strap(x, jermayne) -> Whirr(ethelbert, gordon))\nforall x (Elliptic(x) and Whirr(x, jermayne) -> Strap(x, gordon))\nforall x (Strap(x, gordon) -> Whirr(x, ethelbert))\nforall x (Whirr(x, ethelbert) and Gain(x, ethelbert) -> Strap(x, jermayne))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) and Alive(x) -> Marooned(x))\nforall x (Whirr(x, gordon) and Strap(gordon, jermayne) -> Alive(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) -> Strap(x, gordon))\nforall x (Gain(x, ethelbert) -> Whirr(ethelbert, gordon))\n\nnot Whirr(jermayne, ethelbert)\n\nMozartean(jermayne) and Alive(jermayne) and forall x (Mozartean(x) and Alive(x) -> Marooned(x)) -> therefore Marooned(jermayne) Marooned(jermayne) and forall x (Marooned(x) -> Strap(x, gordon)) -> therefore Strap(jermayne, gordon) Strap(jermayne, gordon) and forall x (Strap(x, gordon) -> Whirr(x, ethelbert)) -> therefore Whirr(jermayne, ethelbert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The griselda excavate the murray. The griselda excavate the goldi. The griselda is whiskery. The griselda weigh the murray. The griselda weigh the goldi. The murray excavate the griselda. The murray excavate the goldi. The murray is unripe. The murray declassify the griselda. The murray declassify the goldi. The murray weigh the goldi. The goldi is unripe. The goldi is unfunded. The goldi declassify the murray. The goldi weigh the griselda. The goldi weigh the murray. If someone excavate the murray and they need the goldi then the murray excavate the griselda. If someone is viviparous and they chase the goldi then they need the griselda. If someone declassify the griselda then they chase the murray. If someone excavate the murray and they see the murray then they need the goldi. Young, unripe people are chitinous. If someone excavate the griselda and the griselda declassify the goldi then they are unripe. If someone is chitinous then they need the griselda. If someone weigh the murray then the murray excavate the griselda. The murray is not chitinous.", "logic": "\nExcavate(griselda, murray)\nExcavate(griselda, goldi)\nWhiskery(griselda)\nWeigh(griselda, murray)\nWeigh(griselda, goldi)\nExcavate(murray, griselda)\nExcavate(murray, goldi)\nUnripe(murray)\nDeclassify(murray, griselda)\nDeclassify(murray, goldi)\nWeigh(murray, goldi)\nUnripe(goldi)\nUnfunded(goldi)\nDeclassify(goldi, murray)\nWeigh(goldi, griselda)\nWeigh(goldi, murray)\nforall x (Excavate(x, murray) and Declassify(x, goldi) -> Excavate(murray, griselda))\nforall x (Viviparous(x) and Excavate(x, goldi) -> Declassify(x, griselda))\nforall x (Declassify(x, griselda) -> Excavate(x, murray))\nforall x (Excavate(x, murray) and Weigh(x, murray) -> Declassify(x, goldi))\nforall x (Unfunded(x) and Unripe(x) -> Chitinous(x))\nforall x (Excavate(x, griselda) and Declassify(griselda, goldi) -> Unripe(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> Declassify(x, griselda))\nforall x (Weigh(x, murray) -> Excavate(murray, griselda))\n\nnot Chitinous(murray)\n\nforall x (Unfunded(x) and Unripe(x) -> Chitinous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The almire bard the davide. The almire bard the luther. The almire is wobbling. The almire deodourise the davide. The almire deodourise the luther. The davide bard the almire. The davide bard the luther. The davide is extralegal. The davide unclasp the almire. The davide unclasp the luther. The davide deodourise the luther. The luther is extralegal. The luther is pinstriped. The luther unclasp the davide. The luther deodourise the almire. The luther deodourise the davide. If someone bard the davide and they need the luther then the davide bard the almire. If someone is atoxic and they chase the luther then they need the almire. If someone unclasp the almire then they chase the davide. If someone bard the davide and they see the davide then they need the luther. Young, extralegal people are stylized. If someone bard the almire and the almire unclasp the luther then they are extralegal. If someone is stylized then they need the almire. If someone deodourise the davide then the davide bard the almire. The almire unclasp the almire.", "logic": "\nBard(almire, davide)\nBard(almire, luther)\nWobbling(almire)\nDeodourise(almire, davide)\nDeodourise(almire, luther)\nBard(davide, almire)\nBard(davide, luther)\nExtralegal(davide)\nUnclasp(davide, almire)\nUnclasp(davide, luther)\nDeodourise(davide, luther)\nExtralegal(luther)\nPinstriped(luther)\nUnclasp(luther, davide)\nDeodourise(luther, almire)\nDeodourise(luther, davide)\nforall x (Bard(x, davide) and Unclasp(x, luther) -> Bard(davide, almire))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) and Bard(x, luther) -> Unclasp(x, almire))\nforall x (Unclasp(x, almire) -> Bard(x, davide))\nforall x (Bard(x, davide) and Deodourise(x, davide) -> Unclasp(x, luther))\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) and Extralegal(x) -> Stylized(x))\nforall x (Bard(x, almire) and Unclasp(almire, luther) -> Extralegal(x))\nforall x (Stylized(x) -> Unclasp(x, almire))\nforall x (Deodourise(x, davide) -> Bard(davide, almire))\n\nUnclasp(almire, almire)\n\nforall x (Stylized(x) -> Unclasp(x, almire)) <- forall x (Pinstriped(x) and Extralegal(x) -> Stylized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The rowland forgive the nady. The rowland forgive the katina. The rowland is three. The rowland tinsel the nady. The rowland tinsel the katina. The nady forgive the rowland. The nady forgive the katina. The nady is dignified. The nady acidify the rowland. The nady acidify the katina. The nady tinsel the katina. The katina is dignified. The katina is thriving. The katina acidify the nady. The katina tinsel the rowland. The katina tinsel the nady. If someone forgive the nady and they need the katina then the nady forgive the rowland. If someone is stunted and they chase the katina then they need the rowland. If someone acidify the rowland then they chase the nady. If someone forgive the nady and they see the nady then they need the katina. Young, dignified people are spiderly. If someone forgive the rowland and the rowland acidify the katina then they are dignified. If someone is spiderly then they need the rowland. If someone tinsel the nady then the nady forgive the rowland. The rowland is not spiderly.", "logic": "\nForgive(rowland, nady)\nForgive(rowland, katina)\nThree(rowland)\nTinsel(rowland, nady)\nTinsel(rowland, katina)\nForgive(nady, rowland)\nForgive(nady, katina)\nDignified(nady)\nAcidify(nady, rowland)\nAcidify(nady, katina)\nTinsel(nady, katina)\nDignified(katina)\nThriving(katina)\nAcidify(katina, nady)\nTinsel(katina, rowland)\nTinsel(katina, nady)\nforall x (Forgive(x, nady) and Acidify(x, katina) -> Forgive(nady, rowland))\nforall x (Stunted(x) and Forgive(x, katina) -> Acidify(x, rowland))\nforall x (Acidify(x, rowland) -> Forgive(x, nady))\nforall x (Forgive(x, nady) and Tinsel(x, nady) -> Acidify(x, katina))\nforall x (Thriving(x) and Dignified(x) -> Spiderly(x))\nforall x (Forgive(x, rowland) and Acidify(rowland, katina) -> Dignified(x))\nforall x (Spiderly(x) -> Acidify(x, rowland))\nforall x (Tinsel(x, nady) -> Forgive(nady, rowland))\n\nnot Spiderly(rowland)\n\nforall x (Thriving(x) and Dignified(x) -> Spiderly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The carlynne cowhide the alina. The carlynne cowhide the dieter. The carlynne is natty. The carlynne present the alina. The carlynne present the dieter. The alina cowhide the carlynne. The alina cowhide the dieter. The alina is flameproof. The alina retroflex the carlynne. The alina retroflex the dieter. The alina present the dieter. The dieter is flameproof. The dieter is empyrean. The dieter retroflex the alina. The dieter present the carlynne. The dieter present the alina. If someone cowhide the alina and they need the dieter then the alina cowhide the carlynne. If someone is irish and they chase the dieter then they need the carlynne. If someone retroflex the carlynne then they chase the alina. If someone cowhide the alina and they see the alina then they need the dieter. Young, flameproof people are asiatic. If someone cowhide the carlynne and the carlynne retroflex the dieter then they are flameproof. If someone is asiatic then they need the carlynne. If someone present the alina then the alina cowhide the carlynne. The carlynne is flameproof.", "logic": "\nCowhide(carlynne, alina)\nCowhide(carlynne, dieter)\nNatty(carlynne)\nPresent(carlynne, alina)\nPresent(carlynne, dieter)\nCowhide(alina, carlynne)\nCowhide(alina, dieter)\nFlameproof(alina)\nRetroflex(alina, carlynne)\nRetroflex(alina, dieter)\nPresent(alina, dieter)\nFlameproof(dieter)\nEmpyrean(dieter)\nRetroflex(dieter, alina)\nPresent(dieter, carlynne)\nPresent(dieter, alina)\nforall x (Cowhide(x, alina) and Retroflex(x, dieter) -> Cowhide(alina, carlynne))\nforall x (Irish(x) and Cowhide(x, dieter) -> Retroflex(x, carlynne))\nforall x (Retroflex(x, carlynne) -> Cowhide(x, alina))\nforall x (Cowhide(x, alina) and Present(x, alina) -> Retroflex(x, dieter))\nforall x (Empyrean(x) and Flameproof(x) -> Asiatic(x))\nforall x (Cowhide(x, carlynne) and Retroflex(carlynne, dieter) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Asiatic(x) -> Retroflex(x, carlynne))\nforall x (Present(x, alina) -> Cowhide(alina, carlynne))\n\nFlameproof(carlynne)\n\nforall x (Cowhide(x, carlynne) and Retroflex(carlynne, dieter) -> Flameproof(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The malina incarnate the morna. The malina incarnate the giana. The malina is southbound. The malina scourge the morna. The malina scourge the giana. The morna incarnate the malina. The morna incarnate the giana. The morna is accusive. The morna vulcanize the malina. The morna vulcanize the giana. The morna scourge the giana. The giana is accusive. The giana is split. The giana vulcanize the morna. The giana scourge the malina. The giana scourge the morna. If someone incarnate the morna and they need the giana then the morna incarnate the malina. If someone is trying and they chase the giana then they need the malina. If someone vulcanize the malina then they chase the morna. If someone incarnate the morna and they see the morna then they need the giana. Young, accusive people are resistive. If someone incarnate the malina and the malina vulcanize the giana then they are accusive. If someone is resistive then they need the malina. If someone scourge the morna then the morna incarnate the malina. The malina does not see the malina.", "logic": "\nIncarnate(malina, morna)\nIncarnate(malina, giana)\nSouthbound(malina)\nScourge(malina, morna)\nScourge(malina, giana)\nIncarnate(morna, malina)\nIncarnate(morna, giana)\nAccusive(morna)\nVulcanize(morna, malina)\nVulcanize(morna, giana)\nScourge(morna, giana)\nAccusive(giana)\nSplit(giana)\nVulcanize(giana, morna)\nScourge(giana, malina)\nScourge(giana, morna)\nforall x (Incarnate(x, morna) and Vulcanize(x, giana) -> Incarnate(morna, malina))\nforall x (Trying(x) and Incarnate(x, giana) -> Vulcanize(x, malina))\nforall x (Vulcanize(x, malina) -> Incarnate(x, morna))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, morna) and Scourge(x, morna) -> Vulcanize(x, giana))\nforall x (Split(x) and Accusive(x) -> Resistive(x))\nforall x (Incarnate(x, malina) and Vulcanize(malina, giana) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Resistive(x) -> Vulcanize(x, malina))\nforall x (Scourge(x, morna) -> Incarnate(morna, malina))\n\nnot Scourge(malina, malina)\n\nnot Scourge(malina, malina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The zelda smooch the raina. The zelda smooch the marleah. The zelda is knobby. The zelda punctuate the raina. The zelda punctuate the marleah. The raina smooch the zelda. The raina smooch the marleah. The raina is spendable. The raina silhouette the zelda. The raina silhouette the marleah. The raina punctuate the marleah. The marleah is spendable. The marleah is balconied. The marleah silhouette the raina. The marleah punctuate the zelda. The marleah punctuate the raina. If someone smooch the raina and they need the marleah then the raina smooch the zelda. If someone is fulgurant and they chase the marleah then they need the zelda. If someone silhouette the zelda then they chase the raina. If someone smooch the raina and they see the raina then they need the marleah. Young, spendable people are tittering. If someone smooch the zelda and the zelda silhouette the marleah then they are spendable. If someone is tittering then they need the zelda. If someone punctuate the raina then the raina smooch the zelda. The zelda is balconied.", "logic": "\nSmooch(zelda, raina)\nSmooch(zelda, marleah)\nKnobby(zelda)\nPunctuate(zelda, raina)\nPunctuate(zelda, marleah)\nSmooch(raina, zelda)\nSmooch(raina, marleah)\nSpendable(raina)\nSilhouette(raina, zelda)\nSilhouette(raina, marleah)\nPunctuate(raina, marleah)\nSpendable(marleah)\nBalconied(marleah)\nSilhouette(marleah, raina)\nPunctuate(marleah, zelda)\nPunctuate(marleah, raina)\nforall x (Smooch(x, raina) and Silhouette(x, marleah) -> Smooch(raina, zelda))\nforall x (Fulgurant(x) and Smooch(x, marleah) -> Silhouette(x, zelda))\nforall x (Silhouette(x, zelda) -> Smooch(x, raina))\nforall x (Smooch(x, raina) and Punctuate(x, raina) -> Silhouette(x, marleah))\nforall x (Balconied(x) and Spendable(x) -> Tittering(x))\nforall x (Smooch(x, zelda) and Silhouette(zelda, marleah) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Tittering(x) -> Silhouette(x, zelda))\nforall x (Punctuate(x, raina) -> Smooch(raina, zelda))\n\nBalconied(zelda)\n\nBalconied(zelda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The alana crease the lyndel. The alana crease the basil. The alana is celtic. The alana forsake the lyndel. The alana forsake the basil. The lyndel crease the alana. The lyndel crease the basil. The lyndel is dried. The lyndel mechanise the alana. The lyndel mechanise the basil. The lyndel forsake the basil. The basil is dried. The basil is hemolytic. The basil mechanise the lyndel. The basil forsake the alana. The basil forsake the lyndel. If someone crease the lyndel and they need the basil then the lyndel crease the alana. If someone is ashy and they chase the basil then they need the alana. If someone mechanise the alana then they chase the lyndel. If someone crease the lyndel and they see the lyndel then they need the basil. Young, dried people are nosohusial. If someone crease the alana and the alana mechanise the basil then they are dried. If someone is nosohusial then they need the alana. If someone forsake the lyndel then the lyndel crease the alana. The alana is not ashy.", "logic": "\nCrease(alana, lyndel)\nCrease(alana, basil)\nCeltic(alana)\nForsake(alana, lyndel)\nForsake(alana, basil)\nCrease(lyndel, alana)\nCrease(lyndel, basil)\nDried(lyndel)\nMechanise(lyndel, alana)\nMechanise(lyndel, basil)\nForsake(lyndel, basil)\nDried(basil)\nHemolytic(basil)\nMechanise(basil, lyndel)\nForsake(basil, alana)\nForsake(basil, lyndel)\nforall x (Crease(x, lyndel) and Mechanise(x, basil) -> Crease(lyndel, alana))\nforall x (Ashy(x) and Crease(x, basil) -> Mechanise(x, alana))\nforall x (Mechanise(x, alana) -> Crease(x, lyndel))\nforall x (Crease(x, lyndel) and Forsake(x, lyndel) -> Mechanise(x, basil))\nforall x (Hemolytic(x) and Dried(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\nforall x (Crease(x, alana) and Mechanise(alana, basil) -> Dried(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> Mechanise(x, alana))\nforall x (Forsake(x, lyndel) -> Crease(lyndel, alana))\n\nnot Ashy(alana)\n\nnot Ashy(alana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The merilyn gush the cristine. The merilyn gush the bernadina. The merilyn is rimmed. The merilyn recoup the cristine. The merilyn recoup the bernadina. The cristine gush the merilyn. The cristine gush the bernadina. The cristine is splitting. The cristine gazette the merilyn. The cristine gazette the bernadina. The cristine recoup the bernadina. The bernadina is splitting. The bernadina is resident. The bernadina gazette the cristine. The bernadina recoup the merilyn. The bernadina recoup the cristine. If someone gush the cristine and they need the bernadina then the cristine gush the merilyn. If someone is inward and they chase the bernadina then they need the merilyn. If someone gazette the merilyn then they chase the cristine. If someone gush the cristine and they see the cristine then they need the bernadina. Young, splitting people are ratlike. If someone gush the merilyn and the merilyn gazette the bernadina then they are splitting. If someone is ratlike then they need the merilyn. If someone recoup the cristine then the cristine gush the merilyn. The bernadina is inward.", "logic": "\nGush(merilyn, cristine)\nGush(merilyn, bernadina)\nRimmed(merilyn)\nRecoup(merilyn, cristine)\nRecoup(merilyn, bernadina)\nGush(cristine, merilyn)\nGush(cristine, bernadina)\nSplitting(cristine)\nGazette(cristine, merilyn)\nGazette(cristine, bernadina)\nRecoup(cristine, bernadina)\nSplitting(bernadina)\nResident(bernadina)\nGazette(bernadina, cristine)\nRecoup(bernadina, merilyn)\nRecoup(bernadina, cristine)\nforall x (Gush(x, cristine) and Gazette(x, bernadina) -> Gush(cristine, merilyn))\nforall x (Inward(x) and Gush(x, bernadina) -> Gazette(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Gazette(x, merilyn) -> Gush(x, cristine))\nforall x (Gush(x, cristine) and Recoup(x, cristine) -> Gazette(x, bernadina))\nforall x (Resident(x) and Splitting(x) -> Ratlike(x))\nforall x (Gush(x, merilyn) and Gazette(merilyn, bernadina) -> Splitting(x))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) -> Gazette(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Recoup(x, cristine) -> Gush(cristine, merilyn))\n\nInward(bernadina)\n\nInward(bernadina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "Baily is milklike. Baily is unlaced. Alaa is avowed. Alaa is milklike. Alaa is unlaced. Alaa is fossorial. Florie is avowed. Florie is milklike. Florie is aligned. Florie is regimental. Florie is fossorial. Florie is general. Jenna is unlaced. Jenna is aligned. Jenna is regimental. Jenna is fossorial. Rough things are general. Kind things are avowed. Furry things are aligned. All unlaced, aligned things are general. White, unlaced things are regimental. If something is general then it is fossorial. Furry things are general. If Jenna is fossorial then Jenna is milklike. Jenna is unlaced.", "logic": "\nMilklike(baily)\nUnlaced(baily)\nAvowed(alaa)\nMilklike(alaa)\nUnlaced(alaa)\nFossorial(alaa)\nAvowed(florie)\nMilklike(florie)\nAligned(florie)\nRegimental(florie)\nFossorial(florie)\nGeneral(florie)\nUnlaced(jenna)\nAligned(jenna)\nRegimental(jenna)\nFossorial(jenna)\nforall x (Regimental(x) -> General(x))\nforall x (Unlaced(x) -> Avowed(x))\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Unlaced(x) and Aligned(x) -> General(x))\nforall x (Fossorial(x) and Unlaced(x) -> Regimental(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Fossorial(x))\nforall x (Milklike(x) -> General(x))\nFossorial(jenna) -> Milklike(jenna)\n\nUnlaced(jenna)\n\ntherefore Unlaced(jenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Reeta is cometary. Reeta is untutored. Bernette is precursory. Bernette is cometary. Bernette is untutored. Bernette is eponymic. Phylys is precursory. Phylys is cometary. Phylys is bohemian. Phylys is anecdotal. Phylys is eponymic. Phylys is horrendous. Bebe is untutored. Bebe is bohemian. Bebe is anecdotal. Bebe is eponymic. Rough things are horrendous. Kind things are precursory. Furry things are bohemian. All untutored, bohemian things are horrendous. White, untutored things are anecdotal. If something is horrendous then it is eponymic. Furry things are horrendous. If Bebe is eponymic then Bebe is cometary. Reeta is not cometary.", "logic": "\nCometary(reeta)\nUntutored(reeta)\nPrecursory(bernette)\nCometary(bernette)\nUntutored(bernette)\nEponymic(bernette)\nPrecursory(phylys)\nCometary(phylys)\nBohemian(phylys)\nAnecdotal(phylys)\nEponymic(phylys)\nHorrendous(phylys)\nUntutored(bebe)\nBohemian(bebe)\nAnecdotal(bebe)\nEponymic(bebe)\nforall x (Anecdotal(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Untutored(x) -> Precursory(x))\nforall x (Cometary(x) -> Bohemian(x))\nforall x (Untutored(x) and Bohemian(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) and Untutored(x) -> Anecdotal(x))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Eponymic(x))\nforall x (Cometary(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nEponymic(bebe) -> Cometary(bebe)\n\nnot Cometary(reeta)\n\ntherefore Cometary(reeta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Clerissa is loyal. Clerissa is ascetical. Ahmed is furthest. Ahmed is loyal. Ahmed is ascetical. Ahmed is acritical. Duane is furthest. Duane is loyal. Duane is preteen. Duane is aquiferous. Duane is acritical. Duane is nonfissile. Leia is ascetical. Leia is preteen. Leia is aquiferous. Leia is acritical. Rough things are nonfissile. Kind things are furthest. Furry things are preteen. All ascetical, preteen things are nonfissile. White, ascetical things are aquiferous. If something is nonfissile then it is acritical. Furry things are nonfissile. If Leia is acritical then Leia is loyal. Leia is loyal.", "logic": "\nLoyal(clerissa)\nAscetical(clerissa)\nFurthest(ahmed)\nLoyal(ahmed)\nAscetical(ahmed)\nAcritical(ahmed)\nFurthest(duane)\nLoyal(duane)\nPreteen(duane)\nAquiferous(duane)\nAcritical(duane)\nNonfissile(duane)\nAscetical(leia)\nPreteen(leia)\nAquiferous(leia)\nAcritical(leia)\nforall x (Aquiferous(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Ascetical(x) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Preteen(x))\nforall x (Ascetical(x) and Preteen(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Acritical(x) and Ascetical(x) -> Aquiferous(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Acritical(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nAcritical(leia) -> Loyal(leia)\n\nLoyal(leia)\n\nAcritical(leia) and Acritical(leia) -> Loyal(leia) -> therefore Loyal(leia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Thomasin is venose. Thomasin is horned. Berte is sublunar. Berte is venose. Berte is horned. Berte is waxlike. Cristine is sublunar. Cristine is venose. Cristine is soggy. Cristine is antique. Cristine is waxlike. Cristine is digressive. Patience is horned. Patience is soggy. Patience is antique. Patience is waxlike. Rough things are digressive. Kind things are sublunar. Furry things are soggy. All horned, soggy things are digressive. White, horned things are antique. If something is digressive then it is waxlike. Furry things are digressive. If Patience is waxlike then Patience is venose. Berte is not digressive.", "logic": "\nVenose(thomasin)\nHorned(thomasin)\nSublunar(berte)\nVenose(berte)\nHorned(berte)\nWaxlike(berte)\nSublunar(cristine)\nVenose(cristine)\nSoggy(cristine)\nAntique(cristine)\nWaxlike(cristine)\nDigressive(cristine)\nHorned(patience)\nSoggy(patience)\nAntique(patience)\nWaxlike(patience)\nforall x (Antique(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Horned(x) -> Sublunar(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Soggy(x))\nforall x (Horned(x) and Soggy(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and Horned(x) -> Antique(x))\nforall x (Digressive(x) -> Waxlike(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) -> Digressive(x))\nWaxlike(patience) -> Venose(patience)\n\nnot Digressive(berte)\n\nVenose(berte) and forall x (Venose(x) -> Digressive(x)) -> therefore Digressive(berte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Coretta is monocled. Coretta is smooth. Duane is sufi. Duane is monocled. Duane is smooth. Duane is famed. Carolee is sufi. Carolee is monocled. Carolee is bifoliate. Carolee is deniable. Carolee is famed. Carolee is excusable. Meier is smooth. Meier is bifoliate. Meier is deniable. Meier is famed. Rough things are excusable. Kind things are sufi. Furry things are bifoliate. All smooth, bifoliate things are excusable. White, smooth things are deniable. If something is excusable then it is famed. Furry things are excusable. If Meier is famed then Meier is monocled. Coretta is famed.", "logic": "\nMonocled(coretta)\nSmooth(coretta)\nSufi(duane)\nMonocled(duane)\nSmooth(duane)\nFamed(duane)\nSufi(carolee)\nMonocled(carolee)\nBifoliate(carolee)\nDeniable(carolee)\nFamed(carolee)\nExcusable(carolee)\nSmooth(meier)\nBifoliate(meier)\nDeniable(meier)\nFamed(meier)\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Smooth(x) -> Sufi(x))\nforall x (Monocled(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Smooth(x) and Bifoliate(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Smooth(x) -> Deniable(x))\nforall x (Excusable(x) -> Famed(x))\nforall x (Monocled(x) -> Excusable(x))\nFamed(meier) -> Monocled(meier)\n\nFamed(coretta)\n\nMonocled(coretta) and forall x (Monocled(x) -> Excusable(x)) -> therefore Excusable(coretta) Excusable(coretta) and forall x (Excusable(x) -> Famed(x)) -> therefore Famed(coretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Tull is appeasing. Tull is avid. Shena is retentive. Shena is appeasing. Shena is avid. Shena is mexican. Tabatha is retentive. Tabatha is appeasing. Tabatha is softheaded. Tabatha is downcast. Tabatha is mexican. Tabatha is tenacious. Clayborn is avid. Clayborn is softheaded. Clayborn is downcast. Clayborn is mexican. Rough things are tenacious. Kind things are retentive. Furry things are softheaded. All avid, softheaded things are tenacious. White, avid things are downcast. If something is tenacious then it is mexican. Furry things are tenacious. If Clayborn is mexican then Clayborn is appeasing. Tull is not mexican.", "logic": "\nAppeasing(tull)\nAvid(tull)\nRetentive(shena)\nAppeasing(shena)\nAvid(shena)\nMexican(shena)\nRetentive(tabatha)\nAppeasing(tabatha)\nSoftheaded(tabatha)\nDowncast(tabatha)\nMexican(tabatha)\nTenacious(tabatha)\nAvid(clayborn)\nSoftheaded(clayborn)\nDowncast(clayborn)\nMexican(clayborn)\nforall x (Downcast(x) -> Tenacious(x))\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Retentive(x))\nforall x (Appeasing(x) -> Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Avid(x) and Softheaded(x) -> Tenacious(x))\nforall x (Mexican(x) and Avid(x) -> Downcast(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Mexican(x))\nforall x (Appeasing(x) -> Tenacious(x))\nMexican(clayborn) -> Appeasing(clayborn)\n\nnot Mexican(tull)\n\nAppeasing(tull) and forall x (Appeasing(x) -> Tenacious(x)) -> therefore Tenacious(tull) Tenacious(tull) and forall x (Tenacious(x) -> Mexican(x)) -> therefore Mexican(tull)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Kingsley is voracious. Kingsley is obstetric. Yale is uveous. Yale is voracious. Yale is obstetric. Yale is tenanted. Tailor is uveous. Tailor is voracious. Tailor is genetical. Tailor is vulval. Tailor is tenanted. Tailor is outsized. Thorn is obstetric. Thorn is genetical. Thorn is vulval. Thorn is tenanted. Rough things are outsized. Kind things are uveous. Furry things are genetical. All obstetric, genetical things are outsized. White, obstetric things are vulval. If something is outsized then it is tenanted. Furry things are outsized. If Thorn is tenanted then Thorn is voracious. Kingsley is vulval.", "logic": "\nVoracious(kingsley)\nObstetric(kingsley)\nUveous(yale)\nVoracious(yale)\nObstetric(yale)\nTenanted(yale)\nUveous(tailor)\nVoracious(tailor)\nGenetical(tailor)\nVulval(tailor)\nTenanted(tailor)\nOutsized(tailor)\nObstetric(thorn)\nGenetical(thorn)\nVulval(thorn)\nTenanted(thorn)\nforall x (Vulval(x) -> Outsized(x))\nforall x (Obstetric(x) -> Uveous(x))\nforall x (Voracious(x) -> Genetical(x))\nforall x (Obstetric(x) and Genetical(x) -> Outsized(x))\nforall x (Tenanted(x) and Obstetric(x) -> Vulval(x))\nforall x (Outsized(x) -> Tenanted(x))\nforall x (Voracious(x) -> Outsized(x))\nTenanted(thorn) -> Voracious(thorn)\n\nVulval(kingsley)\n\nVoracious(kingsley) and forall x (Voracious(x) -> Outsized(x)) -> therefore Outsized(kingsley) Outsized(kingsley) and forall x (Outsized(x) -> Tenanted(x)) -> therefore Tenanted(kingsley) Tenanted(kingsley) and Obstetric(kingsley) and forall x (Tenanted(x) and Obstetric(x) -> Vulval(x)) -> therefore Vulval(kingsley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Euphemia is ablaze. Euphemia is anoestrous. Nancy is tined. Nancy is ablaze. Nancy is anoestrous. Nancy is outlandish. Emelita is tined. Emelita is ablaze. Emelita is diploid. Emelita is tribal. Emelita is outlandish. Emelita is mozambican. Churchill is anoestrous. Churchill is diploid. Churchill is tribal. Churchill is outlandish. Rough things are mozambican. Kind things are tined. Furry things are diploid. All anoestrous, diploid things are mozambican. White, anoestrous things are tribal. If something is mozambican then it is outlandish. Furry things are mozambican. If Churchill is outlandish then Churchill is ablaze. Euphemia is not tribal.", "logic": "\nAblaze(euphemia)\nAnoestrous(euphemia)\nTined(nancy)\nAblaze(nancy)\nAnoestrous(nancy)\nOutlandish(nancy)\nTined(emelita)\nAblaze(emelita)\nDiploid(emelita)\nTribal(emelita)\nOutlandish(emelita)\nMozambican(emelita)\nAnoestrous(churchill)\nDiploid(churchill)\nTribal(churchill)\nOutlandish(churchill)\nforall x (Tribal(x) -> Mozambican(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Tined(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and Diploid(x) -> Mozambican(x))\nforall x (Outlandish(x) and Anoestrous(x) -> Tribal(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> Outlandish(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Mozambican(x))\nOutlandish(churchill) -> Ablaze(churchill)\n\nnot Tribal(euphemia)\n\nAblaze(euphemia) and forall x (Ablaze(x) -> Mozambican(x)) -> therefore Mozambican(euphemia) Mozambican(euphemia) and forall x (Mozambican(x) -> Outlandish(x)) -> therefore Outlandish(euphemia) Outlandish(euphemia) and Anoestrous(euphemia) and forall x (Outlandish(x) and Anoestrous(x) -> Tribal(x)) -> therefore Tribal(euphemia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1160"} {"premises": "Rachael is autonomous. Korrie is litigious. Latisha is shielded. Myrtie is caucasic. Smart things are mirrored. All litigious things are not shielded. If something is mirrored and not shielded then it is caucasic. Big things are enraptured. All shielded things are not enraptured. Rough, litigious things are accusatory. If something is litigious and accusatory then it is autonomous. All litigious, mirrored things are autonomous. Rachael is autonomous.", "logic": "\nAutonomous(rachael)\nLitigious(korrie)\nShielded(latisha)\nCaucasic(myrtie)\nforall x (Litigious(x) -> Mirrored(x))\nforall x (Litigious(x) -> not Shielded(x))\nforall x (Mirrored(x) and not Shielded(x) -> Caucasic(x))\nforall x (Autonomous(x) -> Enraptured(x))\nforall x (Shielded(x) -> not Enraptured(x))\nforall x (Caucasic(x) and Litigious(x) -> Accusatory(x))\nforall x (Litigious(x) and Accusatory(x) -> Autonomous(x))\nforall x (Litigious(x) and Mirrored(x) -> Autonomous(x))\n\nAutonomous(rachael)\n\ntherefore Autonomous(rachael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Jania is undefined. Marcus is nucleated. Raynor is soigne. Zeb is sericeous. Smart things are acaudal. All nucleated things are not soigne. If something is acaudal and not soigne then it is sericeous. Big things are cherubic. All soigne things are not cherubic. Rough, nucleated things are repeatable. If something is nucleated and repeatable then it is undefined. All nucleated, acaudal things are undefined. Zeb is not sericeous.", "logic": "\nUndefined(jania)\nNucleated(marcus)\nSoigne(raynor)\nSericeous(zeb)\nforall x (Nucleated(x) -> Acaudal(x))\nforall x (Nucleated(x) -> not Soigne(x))\nforall x (Acaudal(x) and not Soigne(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) -> Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Soigne(x) -> not Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Nucleated(x) -> Repeatable(x))\nforall x (Nucleated(x) and Repeatable(x) -> Undefined(x))\nforall x (Nucleated(x) and Acaudal(x) -> Undefined(x))\n\nnot Sericeous(zeb)\n\ntherefore Sericeous(zeb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Karlyn is whatever. Blare is tubercular. Yelena is thrifty. Gino is projecting. Smart things are towheaded. All tubercular things are not thrifty. If something is towheaded and not thrifty then it is projecting. Big things are handmade. All thrifty things are not handmade. Rough, tubercular things are clxx. If something is tubercular and clxx then it is whatever. All tubercular, towheaded things are whatever. Blare is towheaded.", "logic": "\nWhatever(karlyn)\nTubercular(blare)\nThrifty(yelena)\nProjecting(gino)\nforall x (Tubercular(x) -> Towheaded(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) -> not Thrifty(x))\nforall x (Towheaded(x) and not Thrifty(x) -> Projecting(x))\nforall x (Whatever(x) -> Handmade(x))\nforall x (Thrifty(x) -> not Handmade(x))\nforall x (Projecting(x) and Tubercular(x) -> Clxx(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) and Clxx(x) -> Whatever(x))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) and Towheaded(x) -> Whatever(x))\n\nTowheaded(blare)\n\nTubercular(blare) and forall x (Tubercular(x) -> Towheaded(x)) -> therefore Towheaded(blare)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Granville is lathery. Debbi is zambian. Nealon is bellicose. Standford is gregarious. Smart things are grubby. All zambian things are not bellicose. If something is grubby and not bellicose then it is gregarious. Big things are lumpish. All bellicose things are not lumpish. Rough, zambian things are angelic. If something is zambian and angelic then it is lathery. All zambian, grubby things are lathery. Nealon is lumpish.", "logic": "\nLathery(granville)\nZambian(debbi)\nBellicose(nealon)\nGregarious(standford)\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Grubby(x))\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> not Bellicose(x))\nforall x (Grubby(x) and not Bellicose(x) -> Gregarious(x))\nforall x (Lathery(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) -> not Lumpish(x))\nforall x (Gregarious(x) and Zambian(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Zambian(x) and Angelic(x) -> Lathery(x))\nforall x (Zambian(x) and Grubby(x) -> Lathery(x))\n\nLumpish(nealon)\n\nBellicose(nealon) and forall x (Bellicose(x) -> not Lumpish(x)) -> therefore not Lumpish(nealon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Zacherie is wakeful. Skyler is reflex. Mersey is chitinous. Mathilda is untapped. Smart things are romish. All reflex things are not chitinous. If something is romish and not chitinous then it is untapped. Big things are libidinous. All chitinous things are not libidinous. Rough, reflex things are littler. If something is reflex and littler then it is wakeful. All reflex, romish things are wakeful. Skyler is wakeful.", "logic": "\nWakeful(zacherie)\nReflex(skyler)\nChitinous(mersey)\nUntapped(mathilda)\nforall x (Reflex(x) -> Romish(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) -> not Chitinous(x))\nforall x (Romish(x) and not Chitinous(x) -> Untapped(x))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) -> not Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) and Reflex(x) -> Littler(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Littler(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and Romish(x) -> Wakeful(x))\n\nWakeful(skyler)\n\nReflex(skyler) and forall x (Reflex(x) -> Romish(x)) -> therefore Romish(skyler) Reflex(skyler) and Romish(skyler) and forall x (Reflex(x) and Romish(x) -> Wakeful(x)) -> therefore Wakeful(skyler)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Bernita is papistical. Marlow is attainable. Lucia is despondent. Clovis is heady. Smart things are cosmic. All attainable things are not despondent. If something is cosmic and not despondent then it is heady. Big things are marvellous. All despondent things are not marvellous. Rough, attainable things are spunky. If something is attainable and spunky then it is papistical. All attainable, cosmic things are papistical. Marlow is not papistical.", "logic": "\nPapistical(bernita)\nAttainable(marlow)\nDespondent(lucia)\nHeady(clovis)\nforall x (Attainable(x) -> Cosmic(x))\nforall x (Attainable(x) -> not Despondent(x))\nforall x (Cosmic(x) and not Despondent(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Papistical(x) -> Marvellous(x))\nforall x (Despondent(x) -> not Marvellous(x))\nforall x (Heady(x) and Attainable(x) -> Spunky(x))\nforall x (Attainable(x) and Spunky(x) -> Papistical(x))\nforall x (Attainable(x) and Cosmic(x) -> Papistical(x))\n\nnot Papistical(marlow)\n\nAttainable(marlow) and forall x (Attainable(x) -> Cosmic(x)) -> therefore Cosmic(marlow) Attainable(marlow) and Cosmic(marlow) and forall x (Attainable(x) and Cosmic(x) -> Papistical(x)) -> therefore Papistical(marlow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Manish is yeatsian. Ruthann is gushy. Cherie is tahitian. Dolora is anabatic. Smart things are uvular. All gushy things are not tahitian. If something is uvular and not tahitian then it is anabatic. Big things are unpromised. All tahitian things are not unpromised. Rough, gushy things are encircling. If something is gushy and encircling then it is yeatsian. All gushy, uvular things are yeatsian. Ruthann is encircling.", "logic": "\nYeatsian(manish)\nGushy(ruthann)\nTahitian(cherie)\nAnabatic(dolora)\nforall x (Gushy(x) -> Uvular(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) -> not Tahitian(x))\nforall x (Uvular(x) and not Tahitian(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) -> Unpromised(x))\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> not Unpromised(x))\nforall x (Anabatic(x) and Gushy(x) -> Encircling(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) and Encircling(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) and Uvular(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\n\nEncircling(ruthann)\n\nGushy(ruthann) and forall x (Gushy(x) -> Uvular(x)) -> therefore Uvular(ruthann) Gushy(ruthann) and forall x (Gushy(x) -> not Tahitian(x)) -> therefore not Tahitian(ruthann) Uvular(ruthann) and not Tahitian(ruthann) and forall x (Uvular(x) and not Tahitian(x) -> Anabatic(x)) -> therefore Anabatic(ruthann) Anabatic(ruthann) and Gushy(ruthann) and forall x (Anabatic(x) and Gushy(x) -> Encircling(x)) -> therefore Encircling(ruthann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Benson is underclass. Alis is wondering. Wiatt is leering. Goldi is veined. Smart things are monopteral. All wondering things are not leering. If something is monopteral and not leering then it is veined. Big things are falconine. All leering things are not falconine. Rough, wondering things are unverified. If something is wondering and unverified then it is underclass. All wondering, monopteral things are underclass. Alis is not falconine.", "logic": "\nUnderclass(benson)\nWondering(alis)\nLeering(wiatt)\nVeined(goldi)\nforall x (Wondering(x) -> Monopteral(x))\nforall x (Wondering(x) -> not Leering(x))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and not Leering(x) -> Veined(x))\nforall x (Underclass(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Leering(x) -> not Falconine(x))\nforall x (Veined(x) and Wondering(x) -> Unverified(x))\nforall x (Wondering(x) and Unverified(x) -> Underclass(x))\nforall x (Wondering(x) and Monopteral(x) -> Underclass(x))\n\nnot Falconine(alis)\n\nWondering(alis) and forall x (Wondering(x) -> Monopteral(x)) -> therefore Monopteral(alis) Wondering(alis) and Monopteral(alis) and forall x (Wondering(x) and Monopteral(x) -> Underclass(x)) -> therefore Underclass(alis) Underclass(alis) and forall x (Underclass(x) -> Falconine(x)) -> therefore Falconine(alis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Lila is antitoxic. Deina is avuncular. Jenica is anginal. Paola is knavish. Smart things are polyatomic. All avuncular things are not anginal. If something is polyatomic and not anginal then it is knavish. Big things are lxxxvii. All anginal things are not lxxxvii. Rough, avuncular things are unbound. If something is avuncular and unbound then it is antitoxic. All avuncular, polyatomic things are antitoxic. Paola is not antitoxic.", "logic": "\nAntitoxic(lila)\nAvuncular(deina)\nAnginal(jenica)\nKnavish(paola)\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Polyatomic(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> not Anginal(x))\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) and not Anginal(x) -> Knavish(x))\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Anginal(x) -> not Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Knavish(x) and Avuncular(x) -> Unbound(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and Unbound(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and Polyatomic(x) -> Antitoxic(x))\n\nnot Antitoxic(paola)\n\nforall x (Avuncular(x) and Unbound(x) -> Antitoxic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Jerrilyn is terminated. Oswell is limbic. Linzy is salving. Coreen is swagger. Smart things are handleless. All limbic things are not salving. If something is handleless and not salving then it is swagger. Big things are planar. All salving things are not planar. Rough, limbic things are nominal. If something is limbic and nominal then it is terminated. All limbic, handleless things are terminated. Linzy is swagger.", "logic": "\nTerminated(jerrilyn)\nLimbic(oswell)\nSalving(linzy)\nSwagger(coreen)\nforall x (Limbic(x) -> Handleless(x))\nforall x (Limbic(x) -> not Salving(x))\nforall x (Handleless(x) and not Salving(x) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (Terminated(x) -> Planar(x))\nforall x (Salving(x) -> not Planar(x))\nforall x (Swagger(x) and Limbic(x) -> Nominal(x))\nforall x (Limbic(x) and Nominal(x) -> Terminated(x))\nforall x (Limbic(x) and Handleless(x) -> Terminated(x))\n\nSwagger(linzy)\n\nforall x (Handleless(x) and not Salving(x) -> Swagger(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Ginni is capped. Gershom is bratty. Brigida is chintzy. Maiga is upbeat. Smart things are mini. All bratty things are not chintzy. If something is mini and not chintzy then it is upbeat. Big things are unwebbed. All chintzy things are not unwebbed. Rough, bratty things are filariid. If something is bratty and filariid then it is capped. All bratty, mini things are capped. Brigida is not mini.", "logic": "\nCapped(ginni)\nBratty(gershom)\nChintzy(brigida)\nUpbeat(maiga)\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Mini(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> not Chintzy(x))\nforall x (Mini(x) and not Chintzy(x) -> Upbeat(x))\nforall x (Capped(x) -> Unwebbed(x))\nforall x (Chintzy(x) -> not Unwebbed(x))\nforall x (Upbeat(x) and Bratty(x) -> Filariid(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) and Filariid(x) -> Capped(x))\nforall x (Bratty(x) and Mini(x) -> Capped(x))\n\nnot Mini(brigida)\n\nforall x (Bratty(x) -> Mini(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Leshia is calibrated. Corine is paralyzed. Everard is hotheaded. Bridie is somatic. Smart things are beamish. All paralyzed things are not hotheaded. If something is beamish and not hotheaded then it is somatic. Big things are scaley. All hotheaded things are not scaley. Rough, paralyzed things are unrentable. If something is paralyzed and unrentable then it is calibrated. All paralyzed, beamish things are calibrated. Everard is calibrated.", "logic": "\nCalibrated(leshia)\nParalyzed(corine)\nHotheaded(everard)\nSomatic(bridie)\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> Beamish(x))\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> not Hotheaded(x))\nforall x (Beamish(x) and not Hotheaded(x) -> Somatic(x))\nforall x (Calibrated(x) -> Scaley(x))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> not Scaley(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) and Paralyzed(x) -> Unrentable(x))\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) and Unrentable(x) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) and Beamish(x) -> Calibrated(x))\n\nCalibrated(everard)\n\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) and Unrentable(x) -> Calibrated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Rafaela is culinary. Ericha is noncurrent. Tommy is thwarted. Matias is astounding. Smart things are pertinent. All noncurrent things are not thwarted. If something is pertinent and not thwarted then it is astounding. Big things are everyday. All thwarted things are not everyday. Rough, noncurrent things are biconcave. If something is noncurrent and biconcave then it is culinary. All noncurrent, pertinent things are culinary. Matias is not noncurrent.", "logic": "\nCulinary(rafaela)\nNoncurrent(ericha)\nThwarted(tommy)\nAstounding(matias)\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) -> Pertinent(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) -> not Thwarted(x))\nforall x (Pertinent(x) and not Thwarted(x) -> Astounding(x))\nforall x (Culinary(x) -> Everyday(x))\nforall x (Thwarted(x) -> not Everyday(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) and Noncurrent(x) -> Biconcave(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) and Biconcave(x) -> Culinary(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) and Pertinent(x) -> Culinary(x))\n\nnot Noncurrent(matias)\n\nnot Noncurrent(matias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Ericha is trilateral. Vanna is sodden. Vergil is empirical. Phylis is categoric. Smart things are derisive. All sodden things are not empirical. If something is derisive and not empirical then it is categoric. Big things are regardful. All empirical things are not regardful. Rough, sodden things are languorous. If something is sodden and languorous then it is trilateral. All sodden, derisive things are trilateral. Ericha is empirical.", "logic": "\nTrilateral(ericha)\nSodden(vanna)\nEmpirical(vergil)\nCategoric(phylis)\nforall x (Sodden(x) -> Derisive(x))\nforall x (Sodden(x) -> not Empirical(x))\nforall x (Derisive(x) and not Empirical(x) -> Categoric(x))\nforall x (Trilateral(x) -> Regardful(x))\nforall x (Empirical(x) -> not Regardful(x))\nforall x (Categoric(x) and Sodden(x) -> Languorous(x))\nforall x (Sodden(x) and Languorous(x) -> Trilateral(x))\nforall x (Sodden(x) and Derisive(x) -> Trilateral(x))\n\nEmpirical(ericha)\n\nEmpirical(ericha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Frankie is screaky. Patrica is avionic. Pierette is carnation. Emalee is botanical. Smart things are fidgety. All avionic things are not carnation. If something is fidgety and not carnation then it is botanical. Big things are jesuitical. All carnation things are not jesuitical. Rough, avionic things are overstrung. If something is avionic and overstrung then it is screaky. All avionic, fidgety things are screaky. Frankie is not avionic.", "logic": "\nScreaky(frankie)\nAvionic(patrica)\nCarnation(pierette)\nBotanical(emalee)\nforall x (Avionic(x) -> Fidgety(x))\nforall x (Avionic(x) -> not Carnation(x))\nforall x (Fidgety(x) and not Carnation(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Carnation(x) -> not Jesuitical(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) and Avionic(x) -> Overstrung(x))\nforall x (Avionic(x) and Overstrung(x) -> Screaky(x))\nforall x (Avionic(x) and Fidgety(x) -> Screaky(x))\n\nnot Avionic(frankie)\n\nnot Avionic(frankie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Urbanus is unspecific. Gertrud is cancellous. Marlee is songful. Adella is dorian. Smart things are hangdog. All cancellous things are not songful. If something is hangdog and not songful then it is dorian. Big things are blae. All songful things are not blae. Rough, cancellous things are puffed. If something is cancellous and puffed then it is unspecific. All cancellous, hangdog things are unspecific. Marlee is cancellous.", "logic": "\nUnspecific(urbanus)\nCancellous(gertrud)\nSongful(marlee)\nDorian(adella)\nforall x (Cancellous(x) -> Hangdog(x))\nforall x (Cancellous(x) -> not Songful(x))\nforall x (Hangdog(x) and not Songful(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Songful(x) -> not Blae(x))\nforall x (Dorian(x) and Cancellous(x) -> Puffed(x))\nforall x (Cancellous(x) and Puffed(x) -> Unspecific(x))\nforall x (Cancellous(x) and Hangdog(x) -> Unspecific(x))\n\nCancellous(marlee)\n\nCancellous(marlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-981"} {"premises": "Linnell is argent. Linnell is sprouted. Linnell is mesophytic. Linnell is decollete. Linnell is quiescent. Linnell is intensive. Linnell is motive. Terrance is decollete. Terrance is intensive. Terrance is motive. All motive things are mesophytic. Red things are sprouted. If something is quiescent and decollete then it is intensive. All sprouted, intensive things are quiescent. If something is intensive and sprouted then it is motive. Round, sprouted things are decollete. Linnell is mesophytic.", "logic": "\nArgent(linnell)\nSprouted(linnell)\nMesophytic(linnell)\nDecollete(linnell)\nQuiescent(linnell)\nIntensive(linnell)\nMotive(linnell)\nDecollete(terrance)\nIntensive(terrance)\nMotive(terrance)\nforall x (Motive(x) -> Mesophytic(x))\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) -> Sprouted(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) and Decollete(x) -> Intensive(x))\nforall x (Sprouted(x) and Intensive(x) -> Quiescent(x))\nforall x (Intensive(x) and Sprouted(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) and Sprouted(x) -> Decollete(x))\n\nMesophytic(linnell)\n\ntherefore Mesophytic(linnell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Sinclare is ancient. Sinclare is anodyne. Sinclare is aliphatic. Sinclare is gravid. Sinclare is calceolate. Sinclare is unseeyn. Sinclare is nonpublic. Friedrich is gravid. Friedrich is unseeyn. Friedrich is nonpublic. All nonpublic things are aliphatic. Red things are anodyne. If something is calceolate and gravid then it is unseeyn. All anodyne, unseeyn things are calceolate. If something is unseeyn and anodyne then it is nonpublic. Round, anodyne things are gravid. Sinclare is not aliphatic.", "logic": "\nAncient(sinclare)\nAnodyne(sinclare)\nAliphatic(sinclare)\nGravid(sinclare)\nCalceolate(sinclare)\nUnseeyn(sinclare)\nNonpublic(sinclare)\nGravid(friedrich)\nUnseeyn(friedrich)\nNonpublic(friedrich)\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Aliphatic(x))\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) -> Anodyne(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) and Gravid(x) -> Unseeyn(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) and Unseeyn(x) -> Calceolate(x))\nforall x (Unseeyn(x) and Anodyne(x) -> Nonpublic(x))\nforall x (Calceolate(x) and Anodyne(x) -> Gravid(x))\n\nnot Aliphatic(sinclare)\n\ntherefore Aliphatic(sinclare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Web is shortish. Web is tetragonal. Web is ungeared. Web is accented. Web is autotypic. Web is mesenteric. Web is satyrical. Slim is accented. Slim is mesenteric. Slim is satyrical. All satyrical things are ungeared. Red things are tetragonal. If something is autotypic and accented then it is mesenteric. All tetragonal, mesenteric things are autotypic. If something is mesenteric and tetragonal then it is satyrical. Round, tetragonal things are accented. Slim is ungeared.", "logic": "\nShortish(web)\nTetragonal(web)\nUngeared(web)\nAccented(web)\nAutotypic(web)\nMesenteric(web)\nSatyrical(web)\nAccented(slim)\nMesenteric(slim)\nSatyrical(slim)\nforall x (Satyrical(x) -> Ungeared(x))\nforall x (Ungeared(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Autotypic(x) and Accented(x) -> Mesenteric(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) and Mesenteric(x) -> Autotypic(x))\nforall x (Mesenteric(x) and Tetragonal(x) -> Satyrical(x))\nforall x (Autotypic(x) and Tetragonal(x) -> Accented(x))\n\nUngeared(slim)\n\nSatyrical(slim) and forall x (Satyrical(x) -> Ungeared(x)) -> therefore Ungeared(slim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Gordan is sagittal. Gordan is deciduous. Gordan is samoan. Gordan is capsulate. Gordan is phrasal. Gordan is stung. Gordan is noncrucial. Levy is capsulate. Levy is stung. Levy is noncrucial. All noncrucial things are samoan. Red things are deciduous. If something is phrasal and capsulate then it is stung. All deciduous, stung things are phrasal. If something is stung and deciduous then it is noncrucial. Round, deciduous things are capsulate. Levy is not samoan.", "logic": "\nSagittal(gordan)\nDeciduous(gordan)\nSamoan(gordan)\nCapsulate(gordan)\nPhrasal(gordan)\nStung(gordan)\nNoncrucial(gordan)\nCapsulate(levy)\nStung(levy)\nNoncrucial(levy)\nforall x (Noncrucial(x) -> Samoan(x))\nforall x (Samoan(x) -> Deciduous(x))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) and Capsulate(x) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Deciduous(x) and Stung(x) -> Phrasal(x))\nforall x (Stung(x) and Deciduous(x) -> Noncrucial(x))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) and Deciduous(x) -> Capsulate(x))\n\nnot Samoan(levy)\n\nNoncrucial(levy) and forall x (Noncrucial(x) -> Samoan(x)) -> therefore Samoan(levy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Maynord is aspiring. Maynord is spermous. Maynord is selfsame. Maynord is maplelike. Maynord is lactic. Maynord is vibrionic. Maynord is laid. Wynn is maplelike. Wynn is vibrionic. Wynn is laid. All laid things are selfsame. Red things are spermous. If something is lactic and maplelike then it is vibrionic. All spermous, vibrionic things are lactic. If something is vibrionic and spermous then it is laid. Round, spermous things are maplelike. Wynn is spermous.", "logic": "\nAspiring(maynord)\nSpermous(maynord)\nSelfsame(maynord)\nMaplelike(maynord)\nLactic(maynord)\nVibrionic(maynord)\nLaid(maynord)\nMaplelike(wynn)\nVibrionic(wynn)\nLaid(wynn)\nforall x (Laid(x) -> Selfsame(x))\nforall x (Selfsame(x) -> Spermous(x))\nforall x (Lactic(x) and Maplelike(x) -> Vibrionic(x))\nforall x (Spermous(x) and Vibrionic(x) -> Lactic(x))\nforall x (Vibrionic(x) and Spermous(x) -> Laid(x))\nforall x (Lactic(x) and Spermous(x) -> Maplelike(x))\n\nSpermous(wynn)\n\nLaid(wynn) and forall x (Laid(x) -> Selfsame(x)) -> therefore Selfsame(wynn) Selfsame(wynn) and forall x (Selfsame(x) -> Spermous(x)) -> therefore Spermous(wynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Walther is andalusian. Walther is bimetal. Walther is knobbed. Walther is vested. Walther is masked. Walther is parametric. Walther is unbigoted. Carla is vested. Carla is parametric. Carla is unbigoted. All unbigoted things are knobbed. Red things are bimetal. If something is masked and vested then it is parametric. All bimetal, parametric things are masked. If something is parametric and bimetal then it is unbigoted. Round, bimetal things are vested. Carla is not bimetal.", "logic": "\nAndalusian(walther)\nBimetal(walther)\nKnobbed(walther)\nVested(walther)\nMasked(walther)\nParametric(walther)\nUnbigoted(walther)\nVested(carla)\nParametric(carla)\nUnbigoted(carla)\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Knobbed(x))\nforall x (Knobbed(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) and Vested(x) -> Parametric(x))\nforall x (Bimetal(x) and Parametric(x) -> Masked(x))\nforall x (Parametric(x) and Bimetal(x) -> Unbigoted(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) and Bimetal(x) -> Vested(x))\n\nnot Bimetal(carla)\n\nUnbigoted(carla) and forall x (Unbigoted(x) -> Knobbed(x)) -> therefore Knobbed(carla) Knobbed(carla) and forall x (Knobbed(x) -> Bimetal(x)) -> therefore Bimetal(carla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Adger is subjective. Adger is saintly. Adger is tympanitic. Adger is sandy. Adger is lapsed. Adger is spiteful. Adger is eellike. Haydon is sandy. Haydon is spiteful. Haydon is eellike. All eellike things are tympanitic. Red things are saintly. If something is lapsed and sandy then it is spiteful. All saintly, spiteful things are lapsed. If something is spiteful and saintly then it is eellike. Round, saintly things are sandy. Haydon is lapsed.", "logic": "\nSubjective(adger)\nSaintly(adger)\nTympanitic(adger)\nSandy(adger)\nLapsed(adger)\nSpiteful(adger)\nEellike(adger)\nSandy(haydon)\nSpiteful(haydon)\nEellike(haydon)\nforall x (Eellike(x) -> Tympanitic(x))\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Lapsed(x) and Sandy(x) -> Spiteful(x))\nforall x (Saintly(x) and Spiteful(x) -> Lapsed(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) and Saintly(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Lapsed(x) and Saintly(x) -> Sandy(x))\n\nLapsed(haydon)\n\nEellike(haydon) and forall x (Eellike(x) -> Tympanitic(x)) -> therefore Tympanitic(haydon) Tympanitic(haydon) and forall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Saintly(x)) -> therefore Saintly(haydon) Saintly(haydon) and Spiteful(haydon) and forall x (Saintly(x) and Spiteful(x) -> Lapsed(x)) -> therefore Lapsed(haydon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Daphna is foolproof. Daphna is albinotic. Daphna is anemic. Daphna is requested. Daphna is designing. Daphna is homosexual. Daphna is primary. Teresina is requested. Teresina is homosexual. Teresina is primary. All primary things are anemic. Red things are albinotic. If something is designing and requested then it is homosexual. All albinotic, homosexual things are designing. If something is homosexual and albinotic then it is primary. Round, albinotic things are requested. Teresina is not designing.", "logic": "\nFoolproof(daphna)\nAlbinotic(daphna)\nAnemic(daphna)\nRequested(daphna)\nDesigning(daphna)\nHomosexual(daphna)\nPrimary(daphna)\nRequested(teresina)\nHomosexual(teresina)\nPrimary(teresina)\nforall x (Primary(x) -> Anemic(x))\nforall x (Anemic(x) -> Albinotic(x))\nforall x (Designing(x) and Requested(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Albinotic(x) and Homosexual(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) and Albinotic(x) -> Primary(x))\nforall x (Designing(x) and Albinotic(x) -> Requested(x))\n\nnot Designing(teresina)\n\nPrimary(teresina) and forall x (Primary(x) -> Anemic(x)) -> therefore Anemic(teresina) Anemic(teresina) and forall x (Anemic(x) -> Albinotic(x)) -> therefore Albinotic(teresina) Albinotic(teresina) and Homosexual(teresina) and forall x (Albinotic(x) and Homosexual(x) -> Designing(x)) -> therefore Designing(teresina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1927"} {"premises": "Helena is stomatous. Helena is appressed. Helena is not punished. Helena is pleasant. Helena is babylonian. Helena is riddled. Zebadiah is stomatous. Zebadiah is appressed. Zebadiah is babylonian. Zebadiah is riddled. Zebadiah is matched. Jolynn is stomatous. Jolynn is appressed. Jolynn is pleasant. Jolynn is babylonian. Quiet things are riddled. If Zebadiah is riddled then Zebadiah is punished. Helena is pleasant.", "logic": "\nStomatous(helena)\nAppressed(helena)\nnot Punished(helena)\nPleasant(helena)\nBabylonian(helena)\nRiddled(helena)\nStomatous(zebadiah)\nAppressed(zebadiah)\nBabylonian(zebadiah)\nRiddled(zebadiah)\nMatched(zebadiah)\nStomatous(jolynn)\nAppressed(jolynn)\nPleasant(jolynn)\nBabylonian(jolynn)\nforall x (Babylonian(x) -> Riddled(x))\nRiddled(zebadiah) -> Punished(zebadiah)\n\nPleasant(helena)\n\ntherefore Pleasant(helena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2592"} {"premises": "Maridel is tearful. Maridel is tympanitic. Maridel is not unpointed. Maridel is nonspatial. Maridel is invaluable. Maridel is liveried. Kristian is tearful. Kristian is tympanitic. Kristian is invaluable. Kristian is liveried. Kristian is irrational. Austen is tearful. Austen is tympanitic. Austen is nonspatial. Austen is invaluable. Quiet things are liveried. If Kristian is liveried then Kristian is unpointed. Austen is not tearful.", "logic": "\nTearful(maridel)\nTympanitic(maridel)\nnot Unpointed(maridel)\nNonspatial(maridel)\nInvaluable(maridel)\nLiveried(maridel)\nTearful(kristian)\nTympanitic(kristian)\nInvaluable(kristian)\nLiveried(kristian)\nIrrational(kristian)\nTearful(austen)\nTympanitic(austen)\nNonspatial(austen)\nInvaluable(austen)\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Liveried(x))\nLiveried(kristian) -> Unpointed(kristian)\n\nnot Tearful(austen)\n\ntherefore Tearful(austen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2592"} {"premises": "Anais is crack. Anais is tuxedoed. Anais is not indefinite. Anais is detected. Anais is servile. Anais is meiotic. Fletch is crack. Fletch is tuxedoed. Fletch is servile. Fletch is meiotic. Fletch is bimestrial. Maya is crack. Maya is tuxedoed. Maya is detected. Maya is servile. Quiet things are meiotic. If Fletch is meiotic then Fletch is indefinite. Maya is not bimestrial.", "logic": "\nCrack(anais)\nTuxedoed(anais)\nnot Indefinite(anais)\nDetected(anais)\nServile(anais)\nMeiotic(anais)\nCrack(fletch)\nTuxedoed(fletch)\nServile(fletch)\nMeiotic(fletch)\nBimestrial(fletch)\nCrack(maya)\nTuxedoed(maya)\nDetected(maya)\nServile(maya)\nforall x (Servile(x) -> Meiotic(x))\nMeiotic(fletch) -> Indefinite(fletch)\n\nnot Bimestrial(maya)\n\nnot Bimestrial(maya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2592"} {"premises": "Hersch is smooth. Hersch is northmost. Hersch is not sequent. Hersch is modifiable. Hersch is buttery. Hersch is influent. Lanita is smooth. Lanita is northmost. Lanita is buttery. Lanita is influent. Lanita is mineral. Sayre is smooth. Sayre is northmost. Sayre is modifiable. Sayre is buttery. Quiet things are influent. If Lanita is influent then Lanita is sequent. Sayre is sequent.", "logic": "\nSmooth(hersch)\nNorthmost(hersch)\nnot Sequent(hersch)\nModifiable(hersch)\nButtery(hersch)\nInfluent(hersch)\nSmooth(lanita)\nNorthmost(lanita)\nButtery(lanita)\nInfluent(lanita)\nMineral(lanita)\nSmooth(sayre)\nNorthmost(sayre)\nModifiable(sayre)\nButtery(sayre)\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> Influent(x))\nInfluent(lanita) -> Sequent(lanita)\n\nSequent(sayre)\n\nSequent(sayre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2592"} {"premises": "The alisha understand the shirlene. The alisha understand the anatola. The alisha hunker the anatola. The alisha is tidal. The alisha is fouled. The alisha entrance the shirlene. The alisha entrance the anatola. The shirlene hunker the alisha. The shirlene is tidal. The shirlene is leprous. The shirlene is cresson. The anatola hunker the shirlene. The anatola is glaswegian. The anatola is cresson. The anatola entrance the shirlene. If something understand the alisha and it is leprous then it understand the anatola. If something is glaswegian and tidal then it entrance the alisha. If something is cresson then it is glaswegian. If something entrance the anatola then it is cresson. If the shirlene understand the anatola and the anatola hunker the shirlene then the anatola is cresson. If something entrance the alisha then the alisha hunker the anatola. The anatola hunker the shirlene.", "logic": "\nUnderstand(alisha, shirlene)\nUnderstand(alisha, anatola)\nHunker(alisha, anatola)\nTidal(alisha)\nFouled(alisha)\nEntrance(alisha, shirlene)\nEntrance(alisha, anatola)\nHunker(shirlene, alisha)\nTidal(shirlene)\nLeprous(shirlene)\nCresson(shirlene)\nHunker(anatola, shirlene)\nGlaswegian(anatola)\nCresson(anatola)\nEntrance(anatola, shirlene)\nforall x (Understand(x, alisha) and Leprous(x) -> Understand(x, anatola))\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) and Tidal(x) -> Entrance(x, alisha))\nforall x (Cresson(x) -> Glaswegian(x))\nforall x (Entrance(x, anatola) -> Cresson(x))\nUnderstand(shirlene, anatola) and Hunker(anatola, shirlene) -> Cresson(anatola)\nforall x (Entrance(x, alisha) -> Hunker(alisha, anatola))\n\nHunker(anatola, shirlene)\n\ntherefore Hunker(anatola, shirlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The benn percolate the noland. The benn percolate the alane. The benn entitle the alane. The benn is insecure. The benn is cyclonic. The benn theologise the noland. The benn theologise the alane. The noland entitle the benn. The noland is insecure. The noland is maidenly. The noland is clad. The alane entitle the noland. The alane is rife. The alane is clad. The alane theologise the noland. If something percolate the benn and it is maidenly then it percolate the alane. If something is rife and insecure then it theologise the benn. If something is clad then it is rife. If something theologise the alane then it is clad. If the noland percolate the alane and the alane entitle the noland then the alane is clad. If something theologise the benn then the benn entitle the alane. The benn is not insecure.", "logic": "\nPercolate(benn, noland)\nPercolate(benn, alane)\nEntitle(benn, alane)\nInsecure(benn)\nCyclonic(benn)\nTheologise(benn, noland)\nTheologise(benn, alane)\nEntitle(noland, benn)\nInsecure(noland)\nMaidenly(noland)\nClad(noland)\nEntitle(alane, noland)\nRife(alane)\nClad(alane)\nTheologise(alane, noland)\nforall x (Percolate(x, benn) and Maidenly(x) -> Percolate(x, alane))\nforall x (Rife(x) and Insecure(x) -> Theologise(x, benn))\nforall x (Clad(x) -> Rife(x))\nforall x (Theologise(x, alane) -> Clad(x))\nPercolate(noland, alane) and Entitle(alane, noland) -> Clad(alane)\nforall x (Theologise(x, benn) -> Entitle(benn, alane))\n\nnot Insecure(benn)\n\ntherefore Insecure(benn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The earle offload the leola. The earle offload the corwin. The earle bruise the corwin. The earle is copernican. The earle is xxvi. The earle militarise the leola. The earle militarise the corwin. The leola bruise the earle. The leola is copernican. The leola is burdensome. The leola is arrogant. The corwin bruise the leola. The corwin is superhuman. The corwin is arrogant. The corwin militarise the leola. If something offload the earle and it is burdensome then it offload the corwin. If something is superhuman and copernican then it militarise the earle. If something is arrogant then it is superhuman. If something militarise the corwin then it is arrogant. If the leola offload the corwin and the corwin bruise the leola then the corwin is arrogant. If something militarise the earle then the earle bruise the corwin. The leola is superhuman.", "logic": "\nOffload(earle, leola)\nOffload(earle, corwin)\nBruise(earle, corwin)\nCopernican(earle)\nXxvi(earle)\nMilitarise(earle, leola)\nMilitarise(earle, corwin)\nBruise(leola, earle)\nCopernican(leola)\nBurdensome(leola)\nArrogant(leola)\nBruise(corwin, leola)\nSuperhuman(corwin)\nArrogant(corwin)\nMilitarise(corwin, leola)\nforall x (Offload(x, earle) and Burdensome(x) -> Offload(x, corwin))\nforall x (Superhuman(x) and Copernican(x) -> Militarise(x, earle))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Superhuman(x))\nforall x (Militarise(x, corwin) -> Arrogant(x))\nOffload(leola, corwin) and Bruise(corwin, leola) -> Arrogant(corwin)\nforall x (Militarise(x, earle) -> Bruise(earle, corwin))\n\nSuperhuman(leola)\n\nArrogant(leola) and forall x (Arrogant(x) -> Superhuman(x)) -> therefore Superhuman(leola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The zorro buckle the korry. The zorro buckle the doreen. The zorro jibe the doreen. The zorro is rhetorical. The zorro is forgotten. The zorro shock the korry. The zorro shock the doreen. The korry jibe the zorro. The korry is rhetorical. The korry is active. The korry is creaseless. The doreen jibe the korry. The doreen is clubbish. The doreen is creaseless. The doreen shock the korry. If something buckle the zorro and it is active then it buckle the doreen. If something is clubbish and rhetorical then it shock the zorro. If something is creaseless then it is clubbish. If something shock the doreen then it is creaseless. If the korry buckle the doreen and the doreen jibe the korry then the doreen is creaseless. If something shock the zorro then the zorro jibe the doreen. The korry is not clubbish.", "logic": "\nBuckle(zorro, korry)\nBuckle(zorro, doreen)\nJibe(zorro, doreen)\nRhetorical(zorro)\nForgotten(zorro)\nShock(zorro, korry)\nShock(zorro, doreen)\nJibe(korry, zorro)\nRhetorical(korry)\nActive(korry)\nCreaseless(korry)\nJibe(doreen, korry)\nClubbish(doreen)\nCreaseless(doreen)\nShock(doreen, korry)\nforall x (Buckle(x, zorro) and Active(x) -> Buckle(x, doreen))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) and Rhetorical(x) -> Shock(x, zorro))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> Clubbish(x))\nforall x (Shock(x, doreen) -> Creaseless(x))\nBuckle(korry, doreen) and Jibe(doreen, korry) -> Creaseless(doreen)\nforall x (Shock(x, zorro) -> Jibe(zorro, doreen))\n\nnot Clubbish(korry)\n\nCreaseless(korry) and forall x (Creaseless(x) -> Clubbish(x)) -> therefore Clubbish(korry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The elizabet shove the margret. The elizabet shove the clarisa. The elizabet weightlift the clarisa. The elizabet is trussed. The elizabet is greasy. The elizabet sanitize the margret. The elizabet sanitize the clarisa. The margret weightlift the elizabet. The margret is trussed. The margret is uppercase. The margret is snappish. The clarisa weightlift the margret. The clarisa is cured. The clarisa is snappish. The clarisa sanitize the margret. If something shove the elizabet and it is uppercase then it shove the clarisa. If something is cured and trussed then it sanitize the elizabet. If something is snappish then it is cured. If something sanitize the clarisa then it is snappish. If the margret shove the clarisa and the clarisa weightlift the margret then the clarisa is snappish. If something sanitize the elizabet then the elizabet weightlift the clarisa. The margret sanitize the elizabet.", "logic": "\nShove(elizabet, margret)\nShove(elizabet, clarisa)\nWeightlift(elizabet, clarisa)\nTrussed(elizabet)\nGreasy(elizabet)\nSanitize(elizabet, margret)\nSanitize(elizabet, clarisa)\nWeightlift(margret, elizabet)\nTrussed(margret)\nUppercase(margret)\nSnappish(margret)\nWeightlift(clarisa, margret)\nCured(clarisa)\nSnappish(clarisa)\nSanitize(clarisa, margret)\nforall x (Shove(x, elizabet) and Uppercase(x) -> Shove(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Cured(x) and Trussed(x) -> Sanitize(x, elizabet))\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Sanitize(x, clarisa) -> Snappish(x))\nShove(margret, clarisa) and Weightlift(clarisa, margret) -> Snappish(clarisa)\nforall x (Sanitize(x, elizabet) -> Weightlift(elizabet, clarisa))\n\nSanitize(margret, elizabet)\n\nSnappish(margret) and forall x (Snappish(x) -> Cured(x)) -> therefore Cured(margret) Cured(margret) and Trussed(margret) and forall x (Cured(x) and Trussed(x) -> Sanitize(x, elizabet)) -> therefore Sanitize(margret, elizabet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The fergus inventory the phebe. The fergus inventory the avraham. The fergus pressurize the avraham. The fergus is rational. The fergus is surging. The fergus brain the phebe. The fergus brain the avraham. The phebe pressurize the fergus. The phebe is rational. The phebe is plotted. The phebe is struck. The avraham pressurize the phebe. The avraham is split. The avraham is struck. The avraham brain the phebe. If something inventory the fergus and it is plotted then it inventory the avraham. If something is split and rational then it brain the fergus. If something is struck then it is split. If something brain the avraham then it is struck. If the phebe inventory the avraham and the avraham pressurize the phebe then the avraham is struck. If something brain the fergus then the fergus pressurize the avraham. The fergus is not split.", "logic": "\nInventory(fergus, phebe)\nInventory(fergus, avraham)\nPressurize(fergus, avraham)\nRational(fergus)\nSurging(fergus)\nBrain(fergus, phebe)\nBrain(fergus, avraham)\nPressurize(phebe, fergus)\nRational(phebe)\nPlotted(phebe)\nStruck(phebe)\nPressurize(avraham, phebe)\nSplit(avraham)\nStruck(avraham)\nBrain(avraham, phebe)\nforall x (Inventory(x, fergus) and Plotted(x) -> Inventory(x, avraham))\nforall x (Split(x) and Rational(x) -> Brain(x, fergus))\nforall x (Struck(x) -> Split(x))\nforall x (Brain(x, avraham) -> Struck(x))\nInventory(phebe, avraham) and Pressurize(avraham, phebe) -> Struck(avraham)\nforall x (Brain(x, fergus) -> Pressurize(fergus, avraham))\n\nnot Split(fergus)\n\nBrain(fergus, avraham) and forall x (Brain(x, avraham) -> Struck(x)) -> therefore Struck(fergus) Struck(fergus) and forall x (Struck(x) -> Split(x)) -> therefore Split(fergus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The padraig martyr the audy. The padraig martyr the sallee. The padraig salve the sallee. The padraig is aphanitic. The padraig is angelic. The padraig reside the audy. The padraig reside the sallee. The audy salve the padraig. The audy is aphanitic. The audy is electric. The audy is rending. The sallee salve the audy. The sallee is weighty. The sallee is rending. The sallee reside the audy. If something martyr the padraig and it is electric then it martyr the sallee. If something is weighty and aphanitic then it reside the padraig. If something is rending then it is weighty. If something reside the sallee then it is rending. If the audy martyr the sallee and the sallee salve the audy then the sallee is rending. If something reside the padraig then the padraig salve the sallee. The padraig reside the padraig.", "logic": "\nMartyr(padraig, audy)\nMartyr(padraig, sallee)\nSalve(padraig, sallee)\nAphanitic(padraig)\nAngelic(padraig)\nReside(padraig, audy)\nReside(padraig, sallee)\nSalve(audy, padraig)\nAphanitic(audy)\nElectric(audy)\nRending(audy)\nSalve(sallee, audy)\nWeighty(sallee)\nRending(sallee)\nReside(sallee, audy)\nforall x (Martyr(x, padraig) and Electric(x) -> Martyr(x, sallee))\nforall x (Weighty(x) and Aphanitic(x) -> Reside(x, padraig))\nforall x (Rending(x) -> Weighty(x))\nforall x (Reside(x, sallee) -> Rending(x))\nMartyr(audy, sallee) and Salve(sallee, audy) -> Rending(sallee)\nforall x (Reside(x, padraig) -> Salve(padraig, sallee))\n\nReside(padraig, padraig)\n\nReside(padraig, sallee) and forall x (Reside(x, sallee) -> Rending(x)) -> therefore Rending(padraig) Rending(padraig) and forall x (Rending(x) -> Weighty(x)) -> therefore Weighty(padraig) Weighty(padraig) and Aphanitic(padraig) and forall x (Weighty(x) and Aphanitic(x) -> Reside(x, padraig)) -> therefore Reside(padraig, padraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The jena outguess the lemmie. The jena outguess the wilmette. The jena scruple the wilmette. The jena is incident. The jena is rusted. The jena vacate the lemmie. The jena vacate the wilmette. The lemmie scruple the jena. The lemmie is incident. The lemmie is sedate. The lemmie is remarkable. The wilmette scruple the lemmie. The wilmette is passe. The wilmette is remarkable. The wilmette vacate the lemmie. If something outguess the jena and it is sedate then it outguess the wilmette. If something is passe and incident then it vacate the jena. If something is remarkable then it is passe. If something vacate the wilmette then it is remarkable. If the lemmie outguess the wilmette and the wilmette scruple the lemmie then the wilmette is remarkable. If something vacate the jena then the jena scruple the wilmette. The jena does not see the jena.", "logic": "\nOutguess(jena, lemmie)\nOutguess(jena, wilmette)\nScruple(jena, wilmette)\nIncident(jena)\nRusted(jena)\nVacate(jena, lemmie)\nVacate(jena, wilmette)\nScruple(lemmie, jena)\nIncident(lemmie)\nSedate(lemmie)\nRemarkable(lemmie)\nScruple(wilmette, lemmie)\nPasse(wilmette)\nRemarkable(wilmette)\nVacate(wilmette, lemmie)\nforall x (Outguess(x, jena) and Sedate(x) -> Outguess(x, wilmette))\nforall x (Passe(x) and Incident(x) -> Vacate(x, jena))\nforall x (Remarkable(x) -> Passe(x))\nforall x (Vacate(x, wilmette) -> Remarkable(x))\nOutguess(lemmie, wilmette) and Scruple(wilmette, lemmie) -> Remarkable(wilmette)\nforall x (Vacate(x, jena) -> Scruple(jena, wilmette))\n\nnot Vacate(jena, jena)\n\nVacate(jena, wilmette) and forall x (Vacate(x, wilmette) -> Remarkable(x)) -> therefore Remarkable(jena) Remarkable(jena) and forall x (Remarkable(x) -> Passe(x)) -> therefore Passe(jena) Passe(jena) and Incident(jena) and forall x (Passe(x) and Incident(x) -> Vacate(x, jena)) -> therefore Vacate(jena, jena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The travers semaphore the elisha. The travers semaphore the mattias. The travers divert the mattias. The travers is monetary. The travers is blunted. The travers jive the elisha. The travers jive the mattias. The elisha divert the travers. The elisha is monetary. The elisha is aramaic. The elisha is squalid. The mattias divert the elisha. The mattias is latin. The mattias is squalid. The mattias jive the elisha. If something semaphore the travers and it is aramaic then it semaphore the mattias. If something is latin and monetary then it jive the travers. If something is squalid then it is latin. If something jive the mattias then it is squalid. If the elisha semaphore the mattias and the mattias divert the elisha then the mattias is squalid. If something jive the travers then the travers divert the mattias. The mattias does not see the travers.", "logic": "\nSemaphore(travers, elisha)\nSemaphore(travers, mattias)\nDivert(travers, mattias)\nMonetary(travers)\nBlunted(travers)\nJive(travers, elisha)\nJive(travers, mattias)\nDivert(elisha, travers)\nMonetary(elisha)\nAramaic(elisha)\nSqualid(elisha)\nDivert(mattias, elisha)\nLatin(mattias)\nSqualid(mattias)\nJive(mattias, elisha)\nforall x (Semaphore(x, travers) and Aramaic(x) -> Semaphore(x, mattias))\nforall x (Latin(x) and Monetary(x) -> Jive(x, travers))\nforall x (Squalid(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Jive(x, mattias) -> Squalid(x))\nSemaphore(elisha, mattias) and Divert(mattias, elisha) -> Squalid(mattias)\nforall x (Jive(x, travers) -> Divert(travers, mattias))\n\nnot Jive(mattias, travers)\n\nforall x (Latin(x) and Monetary(x) -> Jive(x, travers)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The shurlock solmizate the marcos. The shurlock solmizate the fremont. The shurlock assign the fremont. The shurlock is spiteful. The shurlock is avuncular. The shurlock etherify the marcos. The shurlock etherify the fremont. The marcos assign the shurlock. The marcos is spiteful. The marcos is colonic. The marcos is unwashed. The fremont assign the marcos. The fremont is depraved. The fremont is unwashed. The fremont etherify the marcos. If something solmizate the shurlock and it is colonic then it solmizate the fremont. If something is depraved and spiteful then it etherify the shurlock. If something is unwashed then it is depraved. If something etherify the fremont then it is unwashed. If the marcos solmizate the fremont and the fremont assign the marcos then the fremont is unwashed. If something etherify the shurlock then the shurlock assign the fremont. The fremont solmizate the fremont.", "logic": "\nSolmizate(shurlock, marcos)\nSolmizate(shurlock, fremont)\nAssign(shurlock, fremont)\nSpiteful(shurlock)\nAvuncular(shurlock)\nEtherify(shurlock, marcos)\nEtherify(shurlock, fremont)\nAssign(marcos, shurlock)\nSpiteful(marcos)\nColonic(marcos)\nUnwashed(marcos)\nAssign(fremont, marcos)\nDepraved(fremont)\nUnwashed(fremont)\nEtherify(fremont, marcos)\nforall x (Solmizate(x, shurlock) and Colonic(x) -> Solmizate(x, fremont))\nforall x (Depraved(x) and Spiteful(x) -> Etherify(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Unwashed(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Etherify(x, fremont) -> Unwashed(x))\nSolmizate(marcos, fremont) and Assign(fremont, marcos) -> Unwashed(fremont)\nforall x (Etherify(x, shurlock) -> Assign(shurlock, fremont))\n\nSolmizate(fremont, fremont)\n\nforall x (Solmizate(x, shurlock) and Colonic(x) -> Solmizate(x, fremont)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The dasya unsheathe the korrie. The dasya unsheathe the toni. The dasya ferment the toni. The dasya is unanimous. The dasya is meritable. The dasya dicker the korrie. The dasya dicker the toni. The korrie ferment the dasya. The korrie is unanimous. The korrie is restless. The korrie is creaky. The toni ferment the korrie. The toni is billed. The toni is creaky. The toni dicker the korrie. If something unsheathe the dasya and it is restless then it unsheathe the toni. If something is billed and unanimous then it dicker the dasya. If something is creaky then it is billed. If something dicker the toni then it is creaky. If the korrie unsheathe the toni and the toni ferment the korrie then the toni is creaky. If something dicker the dasya then the dasya ferment the toni. The korrie does not chase the toni.", "logic": "\nUnsheathe(dasya, korrie)\nUnsheathe(dasya, toni)\nFerment(dasya, toni)\nUnanimous(dasya)\nMeritable(dasya)\nDicker(dasya, korrie)\nDicker(dasya, toni)\nFerment(korrie, dasya)\nUnanimous(korrie)\nRestless(korrie)\nCreaky(korrie)\nFerment(toni, korrie)\nBilled(toni)\nCreaky(toni)\nDicker(toni, korrie)\nforall x (Unsheathe(x, dasya) and Restless(x) -> Unsheathe(x, toni))\nforall x (Billed(x) and Unanimous(x) -> Dicker(x, dasya))\nforall x (Creaky(x) -> Billed(x))\nforall x (Dicker(x, toni) -> Creaky(x))\nUnsheathe(korrie, toni) and Ferment(toni, korrie) -> Creaky(toni)\nforall x (Dicker(x, dasya) -> Ferment(dasya, toni))\n\nnot Unsheathe(korrie, toni)\n\nforall x (Unsheathe(x, dasya) and Restless(x) -> Unsheathe(x, toni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The aurore imbue the dulcie. The aurore imbue the esmeralda. The aurore sclaff the esmeralda. The aurore is dazed. The aurore is verifying. The aurore baronetize the dulcie. The aurore baronetize the esmeralda. The dulcie sclaff the aurore. The dulcie is dazed. The dulcie is overstated. The dulcie is unconfined. The esmeralda sclaff the dulcie. The esmeralda is doctrinal. The esmeralda is unconfined. The esmeralda baronetize the dulcie. If something imbue the aurore and it is overstated then it imbue the esmeralda. If something is doctrinal and dazed then it baronetize the aurore. If something is unconfined then it is doctrinal. If something baronetize the esmeralda then it is unconfined. If the dulcie imbue the esmeralda and the esmeralda sclaff the dulcie then the esmeralda is unconfined. If something baronetize the aurore then the aurore sclaff the esmeralda. The aurore sclaff the aurore.", "logic": "\nImbue(aurore, dulcie)\nImbue(aurore, esmeralda)\nSclaff(aurore, esmeralda)\nDazed(aurore)\nVerifying(aurore)\nBaronetize(aurore, dulcie)\nBaronetize(aurore, esmeralda)\nSclaff(dulcie, aurore)\nDazed(dulcie)\nOverstated(dulcie)\nUnconfined(dulcie)\nSclaff(esmeralda, dulcie)\nDoctrinal(esmeralda)\nUnconfined(esmeralda)\nBaronetize(esmeralda, dulcie)\nforall x (Imbue(x, aurore) and Overstated(x) -> Imbue(x, esmeralda))\nforall x (Doctrinal(x) and Dazed(x) -> Baronetize(x, aurore))\nforall x (Unconfined(x) -> Doctrinal(x))\nforall x (Baronetize(x, esmeralda) -> Unconfined(x))\nImbue(dulcie, esmeralda) and Sclaff(esmeralda, dulcie) -> Unconfined(esmeralda)\nforall x (Baronetize(x, aurore) -> Sclaff(aurore, esmeralda))\n\nSclaff(aurore, aurore)\n\nSclaff(aurore, aurore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The nettle parch the netty. The nettle parch the dionysus. The nettle surround the dionysus. The nettle is beamy. The nettle is despairing. The nettle spondaise the netty. The nettle spondaise the dionysus. The netty surround the nettle. The netty is beamy. The netty is deviant. The netty is rush. The dionysus surround the netty. The dionysus is motorized. The dionysus is rush. The dionysus spondaise the netty. If something parch the nettle and it is deviant then it parch the dionysus. If something is motorized and beamy then it spondaise the nettle. If something is rush then it is motorized. If something spondaise the dionysus then it is rush. If the netty parch the dionysus and the dionysus surround the netty then the dionysus is rush. If something spondaise the nettle then the nettle surround the dionysus. The netty does not chase the netty.", "logic": "\nParch(nettle, netty)\nParch(nettle, dionysus)\nSurround(nettle, dionysus)\nBeamy(nettle)\nDespairing(nettle)\nSpondaise(nettle, netty)\nSpondaise(nettle, dionysus)\nSurround(netty, nettle)\nBeamy(netty)\nDeviant(netty)\nRush(netty)\nSurround(dionysus, netty)\nMotorized(dionysus)\nRush(dionysus)\nSpondaise(dionysus, netty)\nforall x (Parch(x, nettle) and Deviant(x) -> Parch(x, dionysus))\nforall x (Motorized(x) and Beamy(x) -> Spondaise(x, nettle))\nforall x (Rush(x) -> Motorized(x))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, dionysus) -> Rush(x))\nParch(netty, dionysus) and Surround(dionysus, netty) -> Rush(dionysus)\nforall x (Spondaise(x, nettle) -> Surround(nettle, dionysus))\n\nnot Parch(netty, netty)\n\nnot Parch(netty, netty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The jeralee ionate the vida. The jeralee ionate the jaclin. The jeralee obsolesce the jaclin. The jeralee is factious. The jeralee is redoubled. The jeralee bevel the vida. The jeralee bevel the jaclin. The vida obsolesce the jeralee. The vida is factious. The vida is levantine. The vida is perineal. The jaclin obsolesce the vida. The jaclin is patented. The jaclin is perineal. The jaclin bevel the vida. If something ionate the jeralee and it is levantine then it ionate the jaclin. If something is patented and factious then it bevel the jeralee. If something is perineal then it is patented. If something bevel the jaclin then it is perineal. If the vida ionate the jaclin and the jaclin obsolesce the vida then the jaclin is perineal. If something bevel the jeralee then the jeralee obsolesce the jaclin. The jaclin ionate the jeralee.", "logic": "\nIonate(jeralee, vida)\nIonate(jeralee, jaclin)\nObsolesce(jeralee, jaclin)\nFactious(jeralee)\nRedoubled(jeralee)\nBevel(jeralee, vida)\nBevel(jeralee, jaclin)\nObsolesce(vida, jeralee)\nFactious(vida)\nLevantine(vida)\nPerineal(vida)\nObsolesce(jaclin, vida)\nPatented(jaclin)\nPerineal(jaclin)\nBevel(jaclin, vida)\nforall x (Ionate(x, jeralee) and Levantine(x) -> Ionate(x, jaclin))\nforall x (Patented(x) and Factious(x) -> Bevel(x, jeralee))\nforall x (Perineal(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Bevel(x, jaclin) -> Perineal(x))\nIonate(vida, jaclin) and Obsolesce(jaclin, vida) -> Perineal(jaclin)\nforall x (Bevel(x, jeralee) -> Obsolesce(jeralee, jaclin))\n\nIonate(jaclin, jeralee)\n\nIonate(jaclin, jeralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The nedda behead the job. The nedda behead the ingeberg. The nedda crick the ingeberg. The nedda is bottom. The nedda is unfree. The nedda stagnate the job. The nedda stagnate the ingeberg. The job crick the nedda. The job is bottom. The job is untold. The job is aneroid. The ingeberg crick the job. The ingeberg is deviate. The ingeberg is aneroid. The ingeberg stagnate the job. If something behead the nedda and it is untold then it behead the ingeberg. If something is deviate and bottom then it stagnate the nedda. If something is aneroid then it is deviate. If something stagnate the ingeberg then it is aneroid. If the job behead the ingeberg and the ingeberg crick the job then the ingeberg is aneroid. If something stagnate the nedda then the nedda crick the ingeberg. The job does not chase the nedda.", "logic": "\nBehead(nedda, job)\nBehead(nedda, ingeberg)\nCrick(nedda, ingeberg)\nBottom(nedda)\nUnfree(nedda)\nStagnate(nedda, job)\nStagnate(nedda, ingeberg)\nCrick(job, nedda)\nBottom(job)\nUntold(job)\nAneroid(job)\nCrick(ingeberg, job)\nDeviate(ingeberg)\nAneroid(ingeberg)\nStagnate(ingeberg, job)\nforall x (Behead(x, nedda) and Untold(x) -> Behead(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Deviate(x) and Bottom(x) -> Stagnate(x, nedda))\nforall x (Aneroid(x) -> Deviate(x))\nforall x (Stagnate(x, ingeberg) -> Aneroid(x))\nBehead(job, ingeberg) and Crick(ingeberg, job) -> Aneroid(ingeberg)\nforall x (Stagnate(x, nedda) -> Crick(nedda, ingeberg))\n\nnot Behead(job, nedda)\n\nnot Behead(job, nedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "The zak splice the evangelia. The zak splice the micky. The zak intersect the micky. The zak is spurious. The zak is goosey. The zak echo the evangelia. The zak echo the micky. The evangelia intersect the zak. The evangelia is spurious. The evangelia is nerveless. The evangelia is startled. The micky intersect the evangelia. The micky is cambrian. The micky is startled. The micky echo the evangelia. If something splice the zak and it is nerveless then it splice the micky. If something is cambrian and spurious then it echo the zak. If something is startled then it is cambrian. If something echo the micky then it is startled. If the evangelia splice the micky and the micky intersect the evangelia then the micky is startled. If something echo the zak then the zak intersect the micky. The micky is nerveless.", "logic": "\nSplice(zak, evangelia)\nSplice(zak, micky)\nIntersect(zak, micky)\nSpurious(zak)\nGoosey(zak)\nEcho(zak, evangelia)\nEcho(zak, micky)\nIntersect(evangelia, zak)\nSpurious(evangelia)\nNerveless(evangelia)\nStartled(evangelia)\nIntersect(micky, evangelia)\nCambrian(micky)\nStartled(micky)\nEcho(micky, evangelia)\nforall x (Splice(x, zak) and Nerveless(x) -> Splice(x, micky))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) and Spurious(x) -> Echo(x, zak))\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Echo(x, micky) -> Startled(x))\nSplice(evangelia, micky) and Intersect(micky, evangelia) -> Startled(micky)\nforall x (Echo(x, zak) -> Intersect(zak, micky))\n\nNerveless(micky)\n\nNerveless(micky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Nico is starlike. Nico is unsavoury. Freddi is unsavoury. If something is unsavoury then it is muddied. All unsavoury things are scalable. Rough things are starlike. If Freddi is radiant then Freddi is scalable. Cold, unsavoury things are radiant. All scalable, radiant things are caesarian. Nico is unsavoury.", "logic": "\nStarlike(nico)\nUnsavoury(nico)\nUnsavoury(freddi)\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) -> Muddied(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) -> Scalable(x))\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) -> Starlike(x))\nRadiant(freddi) -> Scalable(freddi)\nforall x (Muddied(x) and Unsavoury(x) -> Radiant(x))\nforall x (Scalable(x) and Radiant(x) -> Caesarian(x))\n\nUnsavoury(nico)\n\ntherefore Unsavoury(nico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Peria is faddy. Peria is blinded. Oran is blinded. If something is blinded then it is hardback. All blinded things are unwooded. Rough things are faddy. If Oran is edentate then Oran is unwooded. Cold, blinded things are edentate. All unwooded, edentate things are baronial. Peria is not blinded.", "logic": "\nFaddy(peria)\nBlinded(peria)\nBlinded(oran)\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Hardback(x))\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Unwooded(x))\nforall x (Blinded(x) -> Faddy(x))\nEdentate(oran) -> Unwooded(oran)\nforall x (Hardback(x) and Blinded(x) -> Edentate(x))\nforall x (Unwooded(x) and Edentate(x) -> Baronial(x))\n\nnot Blinded(peria)\n\ntherefore Blinded(peria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Chrysler is acerate. Chrysler is homeward. Harlin is homeward. If something is homeward then it is hourlong. All homeward things are bellicose. Rough things are acerate. If Harlin is neotenic then Harlin is bellicose. Cold, homeward things are neotenic. All bellicose, neotenic things are streaky. Harlin is bellicose.", "logic": "\nAcerate(chrysler)\nHomeward(chrysler)\nHomeward(harlin)\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Hourlong(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Bellicose(x))\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Acerate(x))\nNeotenic(harlin) -> Bellicose(harlin)\nforall x (Hourlong(x) and Homeward(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Bellicose(x) and Neotenic(x) -> Streaky(x))\n\nBellicose(harlin)\n\nHomeward(harlin) and forall x (Homeward(x) -> Bellicose(x)) -> therefore Bellicose(harlin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Wallace is apodeictic. Wallace is bowed. Barton is bowed. If something is bowed then it is nineteenth. All bowed things are prenuptial. Rough things are apodeictic. If Barton is proximo then Barton is prenuptial. Cold, bowed things are proximo. All prenuptial, proximo things are exocrine. Barton is not apodeictic.", "logic": "\nApodeictic(wallace)\nBowed(wallace)\nBowed(barton)\nforall x (Bowed(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Bowed(x) -> Prenuptial(x))\nforall x (Bowed(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nProximo(barton) -> Prenuptial(barton)\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) and Bowed(x) -> Proximo(x))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) and Proximo(x) -> Exocrine(x))\n\nnot Apodeictic(barton)\n\nBowed(barton) and forall x (Bowed(x) -> Apodeictic(x)) -> therefore Apodeictic(barton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Rudie is witching. Rudie is foldaway. Caldwell is foldaway. If something is foldaway then it is permeant. All foldaway things are vehicular. Rough things are witching. If Caldwell is agrologic then Caldwell is vehicular. Cold, foldaway things are agrologic. All vehicular, agrologic things are linnaean. Caldwell is agrologic.", "logic": "\nWitching(rudie)\nFoldaway(rudie)\nFoldaway(caldwell)\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Permeant(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Vehicular(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Witching(x))\nAgrologic(caldwell) -> Vehicular(caldwell)\nforall x (Permeant(x) and Foldaway(x) -> Agrologic(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) and Agrologic(x) -> Linnaean(x))\n\nAgrologic(caldwell)\n\nFoldaway(caldwell) and forall x (Foldaway(x) -> Permeant(x)) -> therefore Permeant(caldwell) Permeant(caldwell) and Foldaway(caldwell) and forall x (Permeant(x) and Foldaway(x) -> Agrologic(x)) -> therefore Agrologic(caldwell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Whitman is awnless. Whitman is springy. Leda is springy. If something is springy then it is placoid. All springy things are ligneous. Rough things are awnless. If Leda is fair then Leda is ligneous. Cold, springy things are fair. All ligneous, fair things are exportable. Whitman is not fair.", "logic": "\nAwnless(whitman)\nSpringy(whitman)\nSpringy(leda)\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Placoid(x))\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Ligneous(x))\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Awnless(x))\nFair(leda) -> Ligneous(leda)\nforall x (Placoid(x) and Springy(x) -> Fair(x))\nforall x (Ligneous(x) and Fair(x) -> Exportable(x))\n\nnot Fair(whitman)\n\nSpringy(whitman) and forall x (Springy(x) -> Placoid(x)) -> therefore Placoid(whitman) Placoid(whitman) and Springy(whitman) and forall x (Placoid(x) and Springy(x) -> Fair(x)) -> therefore Fair(whitman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Irma is disused. Irma is raiding. Brock is raiding. If something is raiding then it is baltic. All raiding things are spheroidal. Rough things are disused. If Brock is gymnastic then Brock is spheroidal. Cold, raiding things are gymnastic. All spheroidal, gymnastic things are scaleless. Brock is scaleless.", "logic": "\nDisused(irma)\nRaiding(irma)\nRaiding(brock)\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> Baltic(x))\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> Spheroidal(x))\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> Disused(x))\nGymnastic(brock) -> Spheroidal(brock)\nforall x (Baltic(x) and Raiding(x) -> Gymnastic(x))\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) and Gymnastic(x) -> Scaleless(x))\n\nScaleless(brock)\n\nRaiding(brock) and forall x (Raiding(x) -> Spheroidal(x)) -> therefore Spheroidal(brock) Raiding(brock) and forall x (Raiding(x) -> Baltic(x)) -> therefore Baltic(brock) Baltic(brock) and Raiding(brock) and forall x (Baltic(x) and Raiding(x) -> Gymnastic(x)) -> therefore Gymnastic(brock) Spheroidal(brock) and Gymnastic(brock) and forall x (Spheroidal(x) and Gymnastic(x) -> Scaleless(x)) -> therefore Scaleless(brock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Dugan is taiwanese. Dugan is billion. Clarey is billion. If something is billion then it is unmalted. All billion things are legitimate. Rough things are taiwanese. If Clarey is especial then Clarey is legitimate. Cold, billion things are especial. All legitimate, especial things are stentorian. Dugan is not stentorian.", "logic": "\nTaiwanese(dugan)\nBillion(dugan)\nBillion(clarey)\nforall x (Billion(x) -> Unmalted(x))\nforall x (Billion(x) -> Legitimate(x))\nforall x (Billion(x) -> Taiwanese(x))\nEspecial(clarey) -> Legitimate(clarey)\nforall x (Unmalted(x) and Billion(x) -> Especial(x))\nforall x (Legitimate(x) and Especial(x) -> Stentorian(x))\n\nnot Stentorian(dugan)\n\nBillion(dugan) and forall x (Billion(x) -> Legitimate(x)) -> therefore Legitimate(dugan) Billion(dugan) and forall x (Billion(x) -> Unmalted(x)) -> therefore Unmalted(dugan) Unmalted(dugan) and Billion(dugan) and forall x (Unmalted(x) and Billion(x) -> Especial(x)) -> therefore Especial(dugan) Legitimate(dugan) and Especial(dugan) and forall x (Legitimate(x) and Especial(x) -> Stentorian(x)) -> therefore Stentorian(dugan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Malissa is engraved. Malissa is suspected. Golda is suspected. If something is suspected then it is susurrant. All suspected things are eyed. Rough things are engraved. If Golda is routine then Golda is eyed. Cold, suspected things are routine. All eyed, routine things are embryonic. Malissa is not big.", "logic": "\nEngraved(malissa)\nSuspected(malissa)\nSuspected(golda)\nforall x (Suspected(x) -> Susurrant(x))\nforall x (Suspected(x) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Suspected(x) -> Engraved(x))\nRoutine(golda) -> Eyed(golda)\nforall x (Susurrant(x) and Suspected(x) -> Routine(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) and Routine(x) -> Embryonic(x))\n\nnot Big(malissa)\n\nnot Big(malissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "Carolynn is tricuspid. Carolynn is canty. Raye is canty. If something is canty then it is enceinte. All canty things are varying. Rough things are tricuspid. If Raye is spurious then Raye is varying. Cold, canty things are spurious. All varying, spurious things are vigilant. Raye is big.", "logic": "\nTricuspid(carolynn)\nCanty(carolynn)\nCanty(raye)\nforall x (Canty(x) -> Enceinte(x))\nforall x (Canty(x) -> Varying(x))\nforall x (Canty(x) -> Tricuspid(x))\nSpurious(raye) -> Varying(raye)\nforall x (Enceinte(x) and Canty(x) -> Spurious(x))\nforall x (Varying(x) and Spurious(x) -> Vigilant(x))\n\nBig(raye)\n\nBig(raye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-865"} {"premises": "The annissa synthesise the rog. The rog synthesise the annissa. If something camphorate the rog then it synthesise the annissa. If the rog slouch the annissa then the annissa is not manky. If the annissa synthesise the rog then the annissa camphorate the rog. If something camphorate the rog and it synthesise the annissa then the rog slouch the annissa. If something camphorate the rog and it does not visit the rog then the rog synthesise the annissa. If the rog synthesise the annissa and the rog does not see the annissa then the annissa is tardy. If the annissa camphorate the rog then the annissa is not tardy. If something camphorate the rog and it is not tardy then it is not colonised. The rog synthesise the annissa.", "logic": "\nSynthesise(annissa, rog)\nSynthesise(rog, annissa)\nforall x (Camphorate(x, rog) -> Synthesise(x, annissa))\nSlouch(rog, annissa) -> not Manky(annissa)\nSynthesise(annissa, rog) -> Camphorate(annissa, rog)\nforall x (Camphorate(x, rog) and Synthesise(x, annissa) -> Slouch(rog, annissa))\nforall x (Camphorate(x, rog) and not Synthesise(x, rog) -> Synthesise(rog, annissa))\nSynthesise(rog, annissa) and not Slouch(rog, annissa) -> Tardy(annissa)\nCamphorate(annissa, rog) -> not Tardy(annissa)\nforall x (Camphorate(x, rog) and not Tardy(x) -> not Colonised(x))\n\nSynthesise(rog, annissa)\n\ntherefore Synthesise(rog, annissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The daphene blind the magdalen. The magdalen blind the daphene. If something miaow the magdalen then it blind the daphene. If the magdalen bedazzle the daphene then the daphene is not apodal. If the daphene blind the magdalen then the daphene miaow the magdalen. If something miaow the magdalen and it blind the daphene then the magdalen bedazzle the daphene. If something miaow the magdalen and it does not visit the magdalen then the magdalen blind the daphene. If the magdalen blind the daphene and the magdalen does not see the daphene then the daphene is filmable. If the daphene miaow the magdalen then the daphene is not filmable. If something miaow the magdalen and it is not filmable then it is not stillborn. The daphene does not visit the magdalen.", "logic": "\nBlind(daphene, magdalen)\nBlind(magdalen, daphene)\nforall x (Miaow(x, magdalen) -> Blind(x, daphene))\nBedazzle(magdalen, daphene) -> not Apodal(daphene)\nBlind(daphene, magdalen) -> Miaow(daphene, magdalen)\nforall x (Miaow(x, magdalen) and Blind(x, daphene) -> Bedazzle(magdalen, daphene))\nforall x (Miaow(x, magdalen) and not Blind(x, magdalen) -> Blind(magdalen, daphene))\nBlind(magdalen, daphene) and not Bedazzle(magdalen, daphene) -> Filmable(daphene)\nMiaow(daphene, magdalen) -> not Filmable(daphene)\nforall x (Miaow(x, magdalen) and not Filmable(x) -> not Stillborn(x))\n\nnot Blind(daphene, magdalen)\n\ntherefore Blind(daphene, magdalen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The sharyl overhaul the othilie. The othilie overhaul the sharyl. If something marinade the othilie then it overhaul the sharyl. If the othilie checkmate the sharyl then the sharyl is not nonrandom. If the sharyl overhaul the othilie then the sharyl marinade the othilie. If something marinade the othilie and it overhaul the sharyl then the othilie checkmate the sharyl. If something marinade the othilie and it does not visit the othilie then the othilie overhaul the sharyl. If the othilie overhaul the sharyl and the othilie does not see the sharyl then the sharyl is venal. If the sharyl marinade the othilie then the sharyl is not venal. If something marinade the othilie and it is not venal then it is not tangible. The sharyl marinade the othilie.", "logic": "\nOverhaul(sharyl, othilie)\nOverhaul(othilie, sharyl)\nforall x (Marinade(x, othilie) -> Overhaul(x, sharyl))\nCheckmate(othilie, sharyl) -> not Nonrandom(sharyl)\nOverhaul(sharyl, othilie) -> Marinade(sharyl, othilie)\nforall x (Marinade(x, othilie) and Overhaul(x, sharyl) -> Checkmate(othilie, sharyl))\nforall x (Marinade(x, othilie) and not Overhaul(x, othilie) -> Overhaul(othilie, sharyl))\nOverhaul(othilie, sharyl) and not Checkmate(othilie, sharyl) -> Venal(sharyl)\nMarinade(sharyl, othilie) -> not Venal(sharyl)\nforall x (Marinade(x, othilie) and not Venal(x) -> not Tangible(x))\n\nMarinade(sharyl, othilie)\n\nOverhaul(sharyl, othilie) and Overhaul(sharyl, othilie) -> Marinade(sharyl, othilie) -> therefore Marinade(sharyl, othilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The idelle console the chloette. The chloette console the idelle. If something canulate the chloette then it console the idelle. If the chloette repot the idelle then the idelle is not stupendous. If the idelle console the chloette then the idelle canulate the chloette. If something canulate the chloette and it console the idelle then the chloette repot the idelle. If something canulate the chloette and it does not visit the chloette then the chloette console the idelle. If the chloette console the idelle and the chloette does not see the idelle then the idelle is savory. If the idelle canulate the chloette then the idelle is not savory. If something canulate the chloette and it is not savory then it is not arthurian. The idelle does not chase the chloette.", "logic": "\nConsole(idelle, chloette)\nConsole(chloette, idelle)\nforall x (Canulate(x, chloette) -> Console(x, idelle))\nRepot(chloette, idelle) -> not Stupendous(idelle)\nConsole(idelle, chloette) -> Canulate(idelle, chloette)\nforall x (Canulate(x, chloette) and Console(x, idelle) -> Repot(chloette, idelle))\nforall x (Canulate(x, chloette) and not Console(x, chloette) -> Console(chloette, idelle))\nConsole(chloette, idelle) and not Repot(chloette, idelle) -> Savory(idelle)\nCanulate(idelle, chloette) -> not Savory(idelle)\nforall x (Canulate(x, chloette) and not Savory(x) -> not Arthurian(x))\n\nnot Canulate(idelle, chloette)\n\nConsole(idelle, chloette) and Console(idelle, chloette) -> Canulate(idelle, chloette) -> therefore Canulate(idelle, chloette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The sher writhe the valida. The valida writhe the sher. If something rhumba the valida then it writhe the sher. If the valida mark the sher then the sher is not extreme. If the sher writhe the valida then the sher rhumba the valida. If something rhumba the valida and it writhe the sher then the valida mark the sher. If something rhumba the valida and it does not visit the valida then the valida writhe the sher. If the valida writhe the sher and the valida does not see the sher then the sher is corporeal. If the sher rhumba the valida then the sher is not corporeal. If something rhumba the valida and it is not corporeal then it is not jointed. The sher is not corporeal.", "logic": "\nWrithe(sher, valida)\nWrithe(valida, sher)\nforall x (Rhumba(x, valida) -> Writhe(x, sher))\nMark(valida, sher) -> not Extreme(sher)\nWrithe(sher, valida) -> Rhumba(sher, valida)\nforall x (Rhumba(x, valida) and Writhe(x, sher) -> Mark(valida, sher))\nforall x (Rhumba(x, valida) and not Writhe(x, valida) -> Writhe(valida, sher))\nWrithe(valida, sher) and not Mark(valida, sher) -> Corporeal(sher)\nRhumba(sher, valida) -> not Corporeal(sher)\nforall x (Rhumba(x, valida) and not Corporeal(x) -> not Jointed(x))\n\nnot Corporeal(sher)\n\nWrithe(sher, valida) and Writhe(sher, valida) -> Rhumba(sher, valida) -> therefore Rhumba(sher, valida) Rhumba(sher, valida) and Rhumba(sher, valida) -> not Corporeal(sher) -> therefore not Corporeal(sher)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The clifford brisken the piotr. The piotr brisken the clifford. If something snick the piotr then it brisken the clifford. If the piotr stunt the clifford then the clifford is not thalloid. If the clifford brisken the piotr then the clifford snick the piotr. If something snick the piotr and it brisken the clifford then the piotr stunt the clifford. If something snick the piotr and it does not visit the piotr then the piotr brisken the clifford. If the piotr brisken the clifford and the piotr does not see the clifford then the clifford is unbeholden. If the clifford snick the piotr then the clifford is not unbeholden. If something snick the piotr and it is not unbeholden then it is not handless. The clifford is unbeholden.", "logic": "\nBrisken(clifford, piotr)\nBrisken(piotr, clifford)\nforall x (Snick(x, piotr) -> Brisken(x, clifford))\nStunt(piotr, clifford) -> not Thalloid(clifford)\nBrisken(clifford, piotr) -> Snick(clifford, piotr)\nforall x (Snick(x, piotr) and Brisken(x, clifford) -> Stunt(piotr, clifford))\nforall x (Snick(x, piotr) and not Brisken(x, piotr) -> Brisken(piotr, clifford))\nBrisken(piotr, clifford) and not Stunt(piotr, clifford) -> Unbeholden(clifford)\nSnick(clifford, piotr) -> not Unbeholden(clifford)\nforall x (Snick(x, piotr) and not Unbeholden(x) -> not Handless(x))\n\nUnbeholden(clifford)\n\nBrisken(clifford, piotr) and Brisken(clifford, piotr) -> Snick(clifford, piotr) -> therefore Snick(clifford, piotr) Snick(clifford, piotr) and Snick(clifford, piotr) -> not Unbeholden(clifford) -> therefore not Unbeholden(clifford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The amalle splinter the immanuel. The immanuel splinter the amalle. If something arrive the immanuel then it splinter the amalle. If the immanuel backstitch the amalle then the amalle is not actionable. If the amalle splinter the immanuel then the amalle arrive the immanuel. If something arrive the immanuel and it splinter the amalle then the immanuel backstitch the amalle. If something arrive the immanuel and it does not visit the immanuel then the immanuel splinter the amalle. If the immanuel splinter the amalle and the immanuel does not see the amalle then the amalle is intended. If the amalle arrive the immanuel then the amalle is not intended. If something arrive the immanuel and it is not intended then it is not deductible. The immanuel backstitch the amalle.", "logic": "\nSplinter(amalle, immanuel)\nSplinter(immanuel, amalle)\nforall x (Arrive(x, immanuel) -> Splinter(x, amalle))\nBackstitch(immanuel, amalle) -> not Actionable(amalle)\nSplinter(amalle, immanuel) -> Arrive(amalle, immanuel)\nforall x (Arrive(x, immanuel) and Splinter(x, amalle) -> Backstitch(immanuel, amalle))\nforall x (Arrive(x, immanuel) and not Splinter(x, immanuel) -> Splinter(immanuel, amalle))\nSplinter(immanuel, amalle) and not Backstitch(immanuel, amalle) -> Intended(amalle)\nArrive(amalle, immanuel) -> not Intended(amalle)\nforall x (Arrive(x, immanuel) and not Intended(x) -> not Deductible(x))\n\nBackstitch(immanuel, amalle)\n\nSplinter(amalle, immanuel) and Splinter(amalle, immanuel) -> Arrive(amalle, immanuel) -> therefore Arrive(amalle, immanuel) Splinter(amalle, immanuel) and Splinter(amalle, immanuel) -> Arrive(amalle, immanuel) -> therefore Arrive(amalle, immanuel) Arrive(amalle, immanuel) and forall x (Arrive(x, immanuel) -> Splinter(x, amalle)) -> therefore Splinter(amalle, amalle) Arrive(amalle, immanuel) and Splinter(amalle, amalle) and forall x (Arrive(x, immanuel) and Splinter(x, amalle) -> Backstitch(immanuel, amalle)) -> therefore Backstitch(immanuel, amalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The sella maintain the maurice. The maurice maintain the sella. If something engrave the maurice then it maintain the sella. If the maurice pray the sella then the sella is not favourable. If the sella maintain the maurice then the sella engrave the maurice. If something engrave the maurice and it maintain the sella then the maurice pray the sella. If something engrave the maurice and it does not visit the maurice then the maurice maintain the sella. If the maurice maintain the sella and the maurice does not see the sella then the sella is longtime. If the sella engrave the maurice then the sella is not longtime. If something engrave the maurice and it is not longtime then it is not wandering. The maurice does not see the sella.", "logic": "\nMaintain(sella, maurice)\nMaintain(maurice, sella)\nforall x (Engrave(x, maurice) -> Maintain(x, sella))\nPray(maurice, sella) -> not Favourable(sella)\nMaintain(sella, maurice) -> Engrave(sella, maurice)\nforall x (Engrave(x, maurice) and Maintain(x, sella) -> Pray(maurice, sella))\nforall x (Engrave(x, maurice) and not Maintain(x, maurice) -> Maintain(maurice, sella))\nMaintain(maurice, sella) and not Pray(maurice, sella) -> Longtime(sella)\nEngrave(sella, maurice) -> not Longtime(sella)\nforall x (Engrave(x, maurice) and not Longtime(x) -> not Wandering(x))\n\nnot Pray(maurice, sella)\n\nMaintain(sella, maurice) and Maintain(sella, maurice) -> Engrave(sella, maurice) -> therefore Engrave(sella, maurice) Maintain(sella, maurice) and Maintain(sella, maurice) -> Engrave(sella, maurice) -> therefore Engrave(sella, maurice) Engrave(sella, maurice) and forall x (Engrave(x, maurice) -> Maintain(x, sella)) -> therefore Maintain(sella, sella) Engrave(sella, maurice) and Maintain(sella, sella) and forall x (Engrave(x, maurice) and Maintain(x, sella) -> Pray(maurice, sella)) -> therefore Pray(maurice, sella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The ginny fruit the janelle. The janelle fruit the ginny. If something immingle the janelle then it fruit the ginny. If the janelle debilitate the ginny then the ginny is not bounden. If the ginny fruit the janelle then the ginny immingle the janelle. If something immingle the janelle and it fruit the ginny then the janelle debilitate the ginny. If something immingle the janelle and it does not visit the janelle then the janelle fruit the ginny. If the janelle fruit the ginny and the janelle does not see the ginny then the ginny is atactic. If the ginny immingle the janelle then the ginny is not atactic. If something immingle the janelle and it is not atactic then it is not vulnerable. The janelle does not chase the janelle.", "logic": "\nFruit(ginny, janelle)\nFruit(janelle, ginny)\nforall x (Immingle(x, janelle) -> Fruit(x, ginny))\nDebilitate(janelle, ginny) -> not Bounden(ginny)\nFruit(ginny, janelle) -> Immingle(ginny, janelle)\nforall x (Immingle(x, janelle) and Fruit(x, ginny) -> Debilitate(janelle, ginny))\nforall x (Immingle(x, janelle) and not Fruit(x, janelle) -> Fruit(janelle, ginny))\nFruit(janelle, ginny) and not Debilitate(janelle, ginny) -> Atactic(ginny)\nImmingle(ginny, janelle) -> not Atactic(ginny)\nforall x (Immingle(x, janelle) and not Atactic(x) -> not Vulnerable(x))\n\nnot Immingle(janelle, janelle)\n\nnot Immingle(janelle, janelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The rhianna politicise the ambrosi. The ambrosi politicise the rhianna. If something glamorize the ambrosi then it politicise the rhianna. If the ambrosi buttweld the rhianna then the rhianna is not undersea. If the rhianna politicise the ambrosi then the rhianna glamorize the ambrosi. If something glamorize the ambrosi and it politicise the rhianna then the ambrosi buttweld the rhianna. If something glamorize the ambrosi and it does not visit the ambrosi then the ambrosi politicise the rhianna. If the ambrosi politicise the rhianna and the ambrosi does not see the rhianna then the rhianna is leisured. If the rhianna glamorize the ambrosi then the rhianna is not leisured. If something glamorize the ambrosi and it is not leisured then it is not polyatomic. The ambrosi politicise the ambrosi.", "logic": "\nPoliticise(rhianna, ambrosi)\nPoliticise(ambrosi, rhianna)\nforall x (Glamorize(x, ambrosi) -> Politicise(x, rhianna))\nButtweld(ambrosi, rhianna) -> not Undersea(rhianna)\nPoliticise(rhianna, ambrosi) -> Glamorize(rhianna, ambrosi)\nforall x (Glamorize(x, ambrosi) and Politicise(x, rhianna) -> Buttweld(ambrosi, rhianna))\nforall x (Glamorize(x, ambrosi) and not Politicise(x, ambrosi) -> Politicise(ambrosi, rhianna))\nPoliticise(ambrosi, rhianna) and not Buttweld(ambrosi, rhianna) -> Leisured(rhianna)\nGlamorize(rhianna, ambrosi) -> not Leisured(rhianna)\nforall x (Glamorize(x, ambrosi) and not Leisured(x) -> not Polyatomic(x))\n\nPoliticise(ambrosi, ambrosi)\n\nPoliticise(ambrosi, ambrosi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The yale spare the karlee. The karlee spare the yale. If something heliograph the karlee then it spare the yale. If the karlee categorize the yale then the yale is not intent. If the yale spare the karlee then the yale heliograph the karlee. If something heliograph the karlee and it spare the yale then the karlee categorize the yale. If something heliograph the karlee and it does not visit the karlee then the karlee spare the yale. If the karlee spare the yale and the karlee does not see the yale then the yale is khaki. If the yale heliograph the karlee then the yale is not khaki. If something heliograph the karlee and it is not khaki then it is not aquiline. The yale does not see the karlee.", "logic": "\nSpare(yale, karlee)\nSpare(karlee, yale)\nforall x (Heliograph(x, karlee) -> Spare(x, yale))\nCategorize(karlee, yale) -> not Intent(yale)\nSpare(yale, karlee) -> Heliograph(yale, karlee)\nforall x (Heliograph(x, karlee) and Spare(x, yale) -> Categorize(karlee, yale))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, karlee) and not Spare(x, karlee) -> Spare(karlee, yale))\nSpare(karlee, yale) and not Categorize(karlee, yale) -> Khaki(yale)\nHeliograph(yale, karlee) -> not Khaki(yale)\nforall x (Heliograph(x, karlee) and not Khaki(x) -> not Aquiline(x))\n\nnot Categorize(yale, karlee)\n\nnot Categorize(yale, karlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The carleigh predicate the catherin. The catherin predicate the carleigh. If something crane the catherin then it predicate the carleigh. If the catherin voyage the carleigh then the carleigh is not adaxial. If the carleigh predicate the catherin then the carleigh crane the catherin. If something crane the catherin and it predicate the carleigh then the catherin voyage the carleigh. If something crane the catherin and it does not visit the catherin then the catherin predicate the carleigh. If the catherin predicate the carleigh and the catherin does not see the carleigh then the carleigh is ringleted. If the carleigh crane the catherin then the carleigh is not ringleted. If something crane the catherin and it is not ringleted then it is not comical. The catherin is comical.", "logic": "\nPredicate(carleigh, catherin)\nPredicate(catherin, carleigh)\nforall x (Crane(x, catherin) -> Predicate(x, carleigh))\nVoyage(catherin, carleigh) -> not Adaxial(carleigh)\nPredicate(carleigh, catherin) -> Crane(carleigh, catherin)\nforall x (Crane(x, catherin) and Predicate(x, carleigh) -> Voyage(catherin, carleigh))\nforall x (Crane(x, catherin) and not Predicate(x, catherin) -> Predicate(catherin, carleigh))\nPredicate(catherin, carleigh) and not Voyage(catherin, carleigh) -> Ringleted(carleigh)\nCrane(carleigh, catherin) -> not Ringleted(carleigh)\nforall x (Crane(x, catherin) and not Ringleted(x) -> not Comical(x))\n\nComical(catherin)\n\nComical(catherin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The janel incubate the kingsley. The kingsley incubate the janel. If something tout the kingsley then it incubate the janel. If the kingsley allure the janel then the janel is not paediatric. If the janel incubate the kingsley then the janel tout the kingsley. If something tout the kingsley and it incubate the janel then the kingsley allure the janel. If something tout the kingsley and it does not visit the kingsley then the kingsley incubate the janel. If the kingsley incubate the janel and the kingsley does not see the janel then the janel is cousinly. If the janel tout the kingsley then the janel is not cousinly. If something tout the kingsley and it is not cousinly then it is not floored. The kingsley does not chase the janel.", "logic": "\nIncubate(janel, kingsley)\nIncubate(kingsley, janel)\nforall x (Tout(x, kingsley) -> Incubate(x, janel))\nAllure(kingsley, janel) -> not Paediatric(janel)\nIncubate(janel, kingsley) -> Tout(janel, kingsley)\nforall x (Tout(x, kingsley) and Incubate(x, janel) -> Allure(kingsley, janel))\nforall x (Tout(x, kingsley) and not Incubate(x, kingsley) -> Incubate(kingsley, janel))\nIncubate(kingsley, janel) and not Allure(kingsley, janel) -> Cousinly(janel)\nTout(janel, kingsley) -> not Cousinly(janel)\nforall x (Tout(x, kingsley) and not Cousinly(x) -> not Floored(x))\n\nnot Tout(kingsley, janel)\n\nnot Tout(kingsley, janel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The bharat restate the carli. The carli restate the bharat. If something wobble the carli then it restate the bharat. If the carli exacerbate the bharat then the bharat is not drifting. If the bharat restate the carli then the bharat wobble the carli. If something wobble the carli and it restate the bharat then the carli exacerbate the bharat. If something wobble the carli and it does not visit the carli then the carli restate the bharat. If the carli restate the bharat and the carli does not see the bharat then the bharat is separative. If the bharat wobble the carli then the bharat is not separative. If something wobble the carli and it is not separative then it is not partible. The carli exacerbate the carli.", "logic": "\nRestate(bharat, carli)\nRestate(carli, bharat)\nforall x (Wobble(x, carli) -> Restate(x, bharat))\nExacerbate(carli, bharat) -> not Drifting(bharat)\nRestate(bharat, carli) -> Wobble(bharat, carli)\nforall x (Wobble(x, carli) and Restate(x, bharat) -> Exacerbate(carli, bharat))\nforall x (Wobble(x, carli) and not Restate(x, carli) -> Restate(carli, bharat))\nRestate(carli, bharat) and not Exacerbate(carli, bharat) -> Separative(bharat)\nWobble(bharat, carli) -> not Separative(bharat)\nforall x (Wobble(x, carli) and not Separative(x) -> not Partible(x))\n\nExacerbate(carli, carli)\n\nExacerbate(carli, carli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The gillan sizz the lloyd. The lloyd sizz the gillan. If something enthrall the lloyd then it sizz the gillan. If the lloyd shush the gillan then the gillan is not sluicing. If the gillan sizz the lloyd then the gillan enthrall the lloyd. If something enthrall the lloyd and it sizz the gillan then the lloyd shush the gillan. If something enthrall the lloyd and it does not visit the lloyd then the lloyd sizz the gillan. If the lloyd sizz the gillan and the lloyd does not see the gillan then the gillan is weedy. If the gillan enthrall the lloyd then the gillan is not weedy. If something enthrall the lloyd and it is not weedy then it is not neurotic. The lloyd is not weedy.", "logic": "\nSizz(gillan, lloyd)\nSizz(lloyd, gillan)\nforall x (Enthrall(x, lloyd) -> Sizz(x, gillan))\nShush(lloyd, gillan) -> not Sluicing(gillan)\nSizz(gillan, lloyd) -> Enthrall(gillan, lloyd)\nforall x (Enthrall(x, lloyd) and Sizz(x, gillan) -> Shush(lloyd, gillan))\nforall x (Enthrall(x, lloyd) and not Sizz(x, lloyd) -> Sizz(lloyd, gillan))\nSizz(lloyd, gillan) and not Shush(lloyd, gillan) -> Weedy(gillan)\nEnthrall(gillan, lloyd) -> not Weedy(gillan)\nforall x (Enthrall(x, lloyd) and not Weedy(x) -> not Neurotic(x))\n\nnot Weedy(lloyd)\n\nnot Weedy(lloyd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The glenna buffer the lilias. The lilias buffer the glenna. If something prearrange the lilias then it buffer the glenna. If the lilias drill the glenna then the glenna is not holistic. If the glenna buffer the lilias then the glenna prearrange the lilias. If something prearrange the lilias and it buffer the glenna then the lilias drill the glenna. If something prearrange the lilias and it does not visit the lilias then the lilias buffer the glenna. If the lilias buffer the glenna and the lilias does not see the glenna then the glenna is diminuendo. If the glenna prearrange the lilias then the glenna is not diminuendo. If something prearrange the lilias and it is not diminuendo then it is not tined. The glenna is green.", "logic": "\nBuffer(glenna, lilias)\nBuffer(lilias, glenna)\nforall x (Prearrange(x, lilias) -> Buffer(x, glenna))\nDrill(lilias, glenna) -> not Holistic(glenna)\nBuffer(glenna, lilias) -> Prearrange(glenna, lilias)\nforall x (Prearrange(x, lilias) and Buffer(x, glenna) -> Drill(lilias, glenna))\nforall x (Prearrange(x, lilias) and not Buffer(x, lilias) -> Buffer(lilias, glenna))\nBuffer(lilias, glenna) and not Drill(lilias, glenna) -> Diminuendo(glenna)\nPrearrange(glenna, lilias) -> not Diminuendo(glenna)\nforall x (Prearrange(x, lilias) and not Diminuendo(x) -> not Tined(x))\n\nGreen(glenna)\n\nGreen(glenna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1373"} {"premises": "The berte queue the valeria. The berte is toasted. The berte is desultory. The berte is sidelong. The berte macrame the valeria. The berte slim the valeria. The valeria queue the berte. If someone is sidelong then they like the valeria. If someone slim the berte then the berte is dubious. If someone is sidelong and they like the valeria then they see the berte. If someone slim the valeria then they are desultory. If someone macrame the berte then they are sidelong. If someone slim the berte and they see the valeria then the valeria is sidelong. If someone macrame the berte then the berte queue the valeria. If someone is supple and they eat the valeria then they like the valeria. The berte is sidelong.", "logic": "\nQueue(berte, valeria)\nToasted(berte)\nDesultory(berte)\nSidelong(berte)\nMacrame(berte, valeria)\nSlim(berte, valeria)\nQueue(valeria, berte)\nforall x (Sidelong(x) -> Macrame(x, valeria))\nforall x (Slim(x, berte) -> Dubious(berte))\nforall x (Sidelong(x) and Macrame(x, valeria) -> Slim(x, berte))\nforall x (Slim(x, valeria) -> Desultory(x))\nforall x (Macrame(x, berte) -> Sidelong(x))\nforall x (Slim(x, berte) and Slim(x, valeria) -> Sidelong(valeria))\nforall x (Macrame(x, berte) -> Queue(berte, valeria))\nforall x (Supple(x) and Queue(x, valeria) -> Macrame(x, valeria))\n\nSidelong(berte)\n\ntherefore Sidelong(berte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The loreen spangle the hew. The loreen is lubricious. The loreen is balky. The loreen is petallike. The loreen chop the hew. The loreen percuss the hew. The hew spangle the loreen. If someone is petallike then they like the hew. If someone percuss the loreen then the loreen is penurious. If someone is petallike and they like the hew then they see the loreen. If someone percuss the hew then they are balky. If someone chop the loreen then they are petallike. If someone percuss the loreen and they see the hew then the hew is petallike. If someone chop the loreen then the loreen spangle the hew. If someone is realizable and they eat the hew then they like the hew. The loreen is not balky.", "logic": "\nSpangle(loreen, hew)\nLubricious(loreen)\nBalky(loreen)\nPetallike(loreen)\nChop(loreen, hew)\nPercuss(loreen, hew)\nSpangle(hew, loreen)\nforall x (Petallike(x) -> Chop(x, hew))\nforall x (Percuss(x, loreen) -> Penurious(loreen))\nforall x (Petallike(x) and Chop(x, hew) -> Percuss(x, loreen))\nforall x (Percuss(x, hew) -> Balky(x))\nforall x (Chop(x, loreen) -> Petallike(x))\nforall x (Percuss(x, loreen) and Percuss(x, hew) -> Petallike(hew))\nforall x (Chop(x, loreen) -> Spangle(loreen, hew))\nforall x (Realizable(x) and Spangle(x, hew) -> Chop(x, hew))\n\nnot Balky(loreen)\n\ntherefore Balky(loreen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The cally inspirit the smitty. The cally is toothsome. The cally is reciprocal. The cally is subjective. The cally hire the smitty. The cally ghettoise the smitty. The smitty inspirit the cally. If someone is subjective then they like the smitty. If someone ghettoise the cally then the cally is solomonic. If someone is subjective and they like the smitty then they see the cally. If someone ghettoise the smitty then they are reciprocal. If someone hire the cally then they are subjective. If someone ghettoise the cally and they see the smitty then the smitty is subjective. If someone hire the cally then the cally inspirit the smitty. If someone is bawdy and they eat the smitty then they like the smitty. The cally ghettoise the cally.", "logic": "\nInspirit(cally, smitty)\nToothsome(cally)\nReciprocal(cally)\nSubjective(cally)\nHire(cally, smitty)\nGhettoise(cally, smitty)\nInspirit(smitty, cally)\nforall x (Subjective(x) -> Hire(x, smitty))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, cally) -> Solomonic(cally))\nforall x (Subjective(x) and Hire(x, smitty) -> Ghettoise(x, cally))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, smitty) -> Reciprocal(x))\nforall x (Hire(x, cally) -> Subjective(x))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, cally) and Ghettoise(x, smitty) -> Subjective(smitty))\nforall x (Hire(x, cally) -> Inspirit(cally, smitty))\nforall x (Bawdy(x) and Inspirit(x, smitty) -> Hire(x, smitty))\n\nGhettoise(cally, cally)\n\nSubjective(cally) and Hire(cally, smitty) and forall x (Subjective(x) and Hire(x, smitty) -> Ghettoise(x, cally)) -> therefore Ghettoise(cally, cally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The debbra masquerade the clo. The debbra is embryonal. The debbra is flaxen. The debbra is material. The debbra apologize the clo. The debbra glory the clo. The clo masquerade the debbra. If someone is material then they like the clo. If someone glory the debbra then the debbra is dumfounded. If someone is material and they like the clo then they see the debbra. If someone glory the clo then they are flaxen. If someone apologize the debbra then they are material. If someone glory the debbra and they see the clo then the clo is material. If someone apologize the debbra then the debbra masquerade the clo. If someone is cuspidal and they eat the clo then they like the clo. The debbra does not see the debbra.", "logic": "\nMasquerade(debbra, clo)\nEmbryonal(debbra)\nFlaxen(debbra)\nMaterial(debbra)\nApologize(debbra, clo)\nGlory(debbra, clo)\nMasquerade(clo, debbra)\nforall x (Material(x) -> Apologize(x, clo))\nforall x (Glory(x, debbra) -> Dumfounded(debbra))\nforall x (Material(x) and Apologize(x, clo) -> Glory(x, debbra))\nforall x (Glory(x, clo) -> Flaxen(x))\nforall x (Apologize(x, debbra) -> Material(x))\nforall x (Glory(x, debbra) and Glory(x, clo) -> Material(clo))\nforall x (Apologize(x, debbra) -> Masquerade(debbra, clo))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Masquerade(x, clo) -> Apologize(x, clo))\n\nnot Glory(debbra, debbra)\n\nMaterial(debbra) and Apologize(debbra, clo) and forall x (Material(x) and Apologize(x, clo) -> Glory(x, debbra)) -> therefore Glory(debbra, debbra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The marysa demonise the ambrosi. The marysa is reassuring. The marysa is shelfy. The marysa is fulfilled. The marysa extricate the ambrosi. The marysa tend the ambrosi. The ambrosi demonise the marysa. If someone is fulfilled then they like the ambrosi. If someone tend the marysa then the marysa is clad. If someone is fulfilled and they like the ambrosi then they see the marysa. If someone tend the ambrosi then they are shelfy. If someone extricate the marysa then they are fulfilled. If someone tend the marysa and they see the ambrosi then the ambrosi is fulfilled. If someone extricate the marysa then the marysa demonise the ambrosi. If someone is lendable and they eat the ambrosi then they like the ambrosi. The marysa is clad.", "logic": "\nDemonise(marysa, ambrosi)\nReassuring(marysa)\nShelfy(marysa)\nFulfilled(marysa)\nExtricate(marysa, ambrosi)\nTend(marysa, ambrosi)\nDemonise(ambrosi, marysa)\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) -> Extricate(x, ambrosi))\nforall x (Tend(x, marysa) -> Clad(marysa))\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) and Extricate(x, ambrosi) -> Tend(x, marysa))\nforall x (Tend(x, ambrosi) -> Shelfy(x))\nforall x (Extricate(x, marysa) -> Fulfilled(x))\nforall x (Tend(x, marysa) and Tend(x, ambrosi) -> Fulfilled(ambrosi))\nforall x (Extricate(x, marysa) -> Demonise(marysa, ambrosi))\nforall x (Lendable(x) and Demonise(x, ambrosi) -> Extricate(x, ambrosi))\n\nClad(marysa)\n\nFulfilled(marysa) and Extricate(marysa, ambrosi) and forall x (Fulfilled(x) and Extricate(x, ambrosi) -> Tend(x, marysa)) -> therefore Tend(marysa, marysa) Tend(marysa, marysa) and forall x (Tend(x, marysa) -> Clad(marysa)) -> therefore Clad(marysa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The ralina capitulate the corky. The ralina is seaborne. The ralina is skillful. The ralina is stabilized. The ralina produce the corky. The ralina dulcify the corky. The corky capitulate the ralina. If someone is stabilized then they like the corky. If someone dulcify the ralina then the ralina is shriveled. If someone is stabilized and they like the corky then they see the ralina. If someone dulcify the corky then they are skillful. If someone produce the ralina then they are stabilized. If someone dulcify the ralina and they see the corky then the corky is stabilized. If someone produce the ralina then the ralina capitulate the corky. If someone is wigged and they eat the corky then they like the corky. The ralina is not shriveled.", "logic": "\nCapitulate(ralina, corky)\nSeaborne(ralina)\nSkillful(ralina)\nStabilized(ralina)\nProduce(ralina, corky)\nDulcify(ralina, corky)\nCapitulate(corky, ralina)\nforall x (Stabilized(x) -> Produce(x, corky))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, ralina) -> Shriveled(ralina))\nforall x (Stabilized(x) and Produce(x, corky) -> Dulcify(x, ralina))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, corky) -> Skillful(x))\nforall x (Produce(x, ralina) -> Stabilized(x))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, ralina) and Dulcify(x, corky) -> Stabilized(corky))\nforall x (Produce(x, ralina) -> Capitulate(ralina, corky))\nforall x (Wigged(x) and Capitulate(x, corky) -> Produce(x, corky))\n\nnot Shriveled(ralina)\n\nStabilized(ralina) and Produce(ralina, corky) and forall x (Stabilized(x) and Produce(x, corky) -> Dulcify(x, ralina)) -> therefore Dulcify(ralina, ralina) Dulcify(ralina, ralina) and forall x (Dulcify(x, ralina) -> Shriveled(ralina)) -> therefore Shriveled(ralina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The gwenneth minimize the nannie. The gwenneth is unpunctual. The gwenneth is evaporated. The gwenneth is unspoilt. The gwenneth reuse the nannie. The gwenneth laud the nannie. The nannie minimize the gwenneth. If someone is unspoilt then they like the nannie. If someone laud the gwenneth then the gwenneth is rugose. If someone is unspoilt and they like the nannie then they see the gwenneth. If someone laud the nannie then they are evaporated. If someone reuse the gwenneth then they are unspoilt. If someone laud the gwenneth and they see the nannie then the nannie is unspoilt. If someone reuse the gwenneth then the gwenneth minimize the nannie. If someone is eparchial and they eat the nannie then they like the nannie. The nannie reuse the nannie.", "logic": "\nMinimize(gwenneth, nannie)\nUnpunctual(gwenneth)\nEvaporated(gwenneth)\nUnspoilt(gwenneth)\nReuse(gwenneth, nannie)\nLaud(gwenneth, nannie)\nMinimize(nannie, gwenneth)\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) -> Reuse(x, nannie))\nforall x (Laud(x, gwenneth) -> Rugose(gwenneth))\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) and Reuse(x, nannie) -> Laud(x, gwenneth))\nforall x (Laud(x, nannie) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Reuse(x, gwenneth) -> Unspoilt(x))\nforall x (Laud(x, gwenneth) and Laud(x, nannie) -> Unspoilt(nannie))\nforall x (Reuse(x, gwenneth) -> Minimize(gwenneth, nannie))\nforall x (Eparchial(x) and Minimize(x, nannie) -> Reuse(x, nannie))\n\nReuse(nannie, nannie)\n\nUnspoilt(gwenneth) and Reuse(gwenneth, nannie) and forall x (Unspoilt(x) and Reuse(x, nannie) -> Laud(x, gwenneth)) -> therefore Laud(gwenneth, gwenneth) Laud(gwenneth, gwenneth) and Laud(gwenneth, nannie) and forall x (Laud(x, gwenneth) and Laud(x, nannie) -> Unspoilt(nannie)) -> therefore Unspoilt(nannie) Unspoilt(nannie) and forall x (Unspoilt(x) -> Reuse(x, nannie)) -> therefore Reuse(nannie, nannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The pierette disburden the bria. The pierette is anodal. The pierette is personable. The pierette is bourgeois. The pierette resorb the bria. The pierette fringe the bria. The bria disburden the pierette. If someone is bourgeois then they like the bria. If someone fringe the pierette then the pierette is limp. If someone is bourgeois and they like the bria then they see the pierette. If someone fringe the bria then they are personable. If someone resorb the pierette then they are bourgeois. If someone fringe the pierette and they see the bria then the bria is bourgeois. If someone resorb the pierette then the pierette disburden the bria. If someone is collected and they eat the bria then they like the bria. The bria does not like the bria.", "logic": "\nDisburden(pierette, bria)\nAnodal(pierette)\nPersonable(pierette)\nBourgeois(pierette)\nResorb(pierette, bria)\nFringe(pierette, bria)\nDisburden(bria, pierette)\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) -> Resorb(x, bria))\nforall x (Fringe(x, pierette) -> Limp(pierette))\nforall x (Bourgeois(x) and Resorb(x, bria) -> Fringe(x, pierette))\nforall x (Fringe(x, bria) -> Personable(x))\nforall x (Resorb(x, pierette) -> Bourgeois(x))\nforall x (Fringe(x, pierette) and Fringe(x, bria) -> Bourgeois(bria))\nforall x (Resorb(x, pierette) -> Disburden(pierette, bria))\nforall x (Collected(x) and Disburden(x, bria) -> Resorb(x, bria))\n\nnot Resorb(bria, bria)\n\nBourgeois(pierette) and Resorb(pierette, bria) and forall x (Bourgeois(x) and Resorb(x, bria) -> Fringe(x, pierette)) -> therefore Fringe(pierette, pierette) Fringe(pierette, pierette) and Fringe(pierette, bria) and forall x (Fringe(x, pierette) and Fringe(x, bria) -> Bourgeois(bria)) -> therefore Bourgeois(bria) Bourgeois(bria) and forall x (Bourgeois(x) -> Resorb(x, bria)) -> therefore Resorb(bria, bria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The robbi rubbish the marylinda. The robbi is prevailing. The robbi is seductive. The robbi is worsened. The robbi mimeograph the marylinda. The robbi gird the marylinda. The marylinda rubbish the robbi. If someone is worsened then they like the marylinda. If someone gird the robbi then the robbi is goaded. If someone is worsened and they like the marylinda then they see the robbi. If someone gird the marylinda then they are seductive. If someone mimeograph the robbi then they are worsened. If someone gird the robbi and they see the marylinda then the marylinda is worsened. If someone mimeograph the robbi then the robbi rubbish the marylinda. If someone is dyspneal and they eat the marylinda then they like the marylinda. The marylinda is not seductive.", "logic": "\nRubbish(robbi, marylinda)\nPrevailing(robbi)\nSeductive(robbi)\nWorsened(robbi)\nMimeograph(robbi, marylinda)\nGird(robbi, marylinda)\nRubbish(marylinda, robbi)\nforall x (Worsened(x) -> Mimeograph(x, marylinda))\nforall x (Gird(x, robbi) -> Goaded(robbi))\nforall x (Worsened(x) and Mimeograph(x, marylinda) -> Gird(x, robbi))\nforall x (Gird(x, marylinda) -> Seductive(x))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, robbi) -> Worsened(x))\nforall x (Gird(x, robbi) and Gird(x, marylinda) -> Worsened(marylinda))\nforall x (Mimeograph(x, robbi) -> Rubbish(robbi, marylinda))\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and Rubbish(x, marylinda) -> Mimeograph(x, marylinda))\n\nnot Seductive(marylinda)\n\nforall x (Gird(x, marylinda) -> Seductive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The amelina apperceive the tarrah. The amelina is fragrant. The amelina is raging. The amelina is contorted. The amelina plunge the tarrah. The amelina wall the tarrah. The tarrah apperceive the amelina. If someone is contorted then they like the tarrah. If someone wall the amelina then the amelina is maximizing. If someone is contorted and they like the tarrah then they see the amelina. If someone wall the tarrah then they are raging. If someone plunge the amelina then they are contorted. If someone wall the amelina and they see the tarrah then the tarrah is contorted. If someone plunge the amelina then the amelina apperceive the tarrah. If someone is hindustani and they eat the tarrah then they like the tarrah. The tarrah is maximizing.", "logic": "\nApperceive(amelina, tarrah)\nFragrant(amelina)\nRaging(amelina)\nContorted(amelina)\nPlunge(amelina, tarrah)\nWall(amelina, tarrah)\nApperceive(tarrah, amelina)\nforall x (Contorted(x) -> Plunge(x, tarrah))\nforall x (Wall(x, amelina) -> Maximizing(amelina))\nforall x (Contorted(x) and Plunge(x, tarrah) -> Wall(x, amelina))\nforall x (Wall(x, tarrah) -> Raging(x))\nforall x (Plunge(x, amelina) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Wall(x, amelina) and Wall(x, tarrah) -> Contorted(tarrah))\nforall x (Plunge(x, amelina) -> Apperceive(amelina, tarrah))\nforall x (Hindustani(x) and Apperceive(x, tarrah) -> Plunge(x, tarrah))\n\nMaximizing(tarrah)\n\nMaximizing(tarrah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The danice malinger the muhammad. The danice is sportive. The danice is lendable. The danice is wintry. The danice chitchat the muhammad. The danice worsen the muhammad. The muhammad malinger the danice. If someone is wintry then they like the muhammad. If someone worsen the danice then the danice is glutinous. If someone is wintry and they like the muhammad then they see the danice. If someone worsen the muhammad then they are lendable. If someone chitchat the danice then they are wintry. If someone worsen the danice and they see the muhammad then the muhammad is wintry. If someone chitchat the danice then the danice malinger the muhammad. If someone is staid and they eat the muhammad then they like the muhammad. The muhammad does not like the danice.", "logic": "\nMalinger(danice, muhammad)\nSportive(danice)\nLendable(danice)\nWintry(danice)\nChitchat(danice, muhammad)\nWorsen(danice, muhammad)\nMalinger(muhammad, danice)\nforall x (Wintry(x) -> Chitchat(x, muhammad))\nforall x (Worsen(x, danice) -> Glutinous(danice))\nforall x (Wintry(x) and Chitchat(x, muhammad) -> Worsen(x, danice))\nforall x (Worsen(x, muhammad) -> Lendable(x))\nforall x (Chitchat(x, danice) -> Wintry(x))\nforall x (Worsen(x, danice) and Worsen(x, muhammad) -> Wintry(muhammad))\nforall x (Chitchat(x, danice) -> Malinger(danice, muhammad))\nforall x (Staid(x) and Malinger(x, muhammad) -> Chitchat(x, muhammad))\n\nnot Chitchat(muhammad, danice)\n\nnot Chitchat(muhammad, danice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The cathee scorn the sybyl. The cathee is retained. The cathee is reverent. The cathee is anaclitic. The cathee ascend the sybyl. The cathee sulk the sybyl. The sybyl scorn the cathee. If someone is anaclitic then they like the sybyl. If someone sulk the cathee then the cathee is worldly. If someone is anaclitic and they like the sybyl then they see the cathee. If someone sulk the sybyl then they are reverent. If someone ascend the cathee then they are anaclitic. If someone sulk the cathee and they see the sybyl then the sybyl is anaclitic. If someone ascend the cathee then the cathee scorn the sybyl. If someone is jumentous and they eat the sybyl then they like the sybyl. The sybyl is retained.", "logic": "\nScorn(cathee, sybyl)\nRetained(cathee)\nReverent(cathee)\nAnaclitic(cathee)\nAscend(cathee, sybyl)\nSulk(cathee, sybyl)\nScorn(sybyl, cathee)\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) -> Ascend(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Sulk(x, cathee) -> Worldly(cathee))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and Ascend(x, sybyl) -> Sulk(x, cathee))\nforall x (Sulk(x, sybyl) -> Reverent(x))\nforall x (Ascend(x, cathee) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Sulk(x, cathee) and Sulk(x, sybyl) -> Anaclitic(sybyl))\nforall x (Ascend(x, cathee) -> Scorn(cathee, sybyl))\nforall x (Jumentous(x) and Scorn(x, sybyl) -> Ascend(x, sybyl))\n\nRetained(sybyl)\n\nRetained(sybyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The leanna elucidate the farica. The leanna is pitiless. The leanna is adequate. The leanna is looted. The leanna coexist the farica. The leanna amnesty the farica. The farica elucidate the leanna. If someone is looted then they like the farica. If someone amnesty the leanna then the leanna is unenforced. If someone is looted and they like the farica then they see the leanna. If someone amnesty the farica then they are adequate. If someone coexist the leanna then they are looted. If someone amnesty the leanna and they see the farica then the farica is looted. If someone coexist the leanna then the leanna elucidate the farica. If someone is custom and they eat the farica then they like the farica. The leanna is not custom.", "logic": "\nElucidate(leanna, farica)\nPitiless(leanna)\nAdequate(leanna)\nLooted(leanna)\nCoexist(leanna, farica)\nAmnesty(leanna, farica)\nElucidate(farica, leanna)\nforall x (Looted(x) -> Coexist(x, farica))\nforall x (Amnesty(x, leanna) -> Unenforced(leanna))\nforall x (Looted(x) and Coexist(x, farica) -> Amnesty(x, leanna))\nforall x (Amnesty(x, farica) -> Adequate(x))\nforall x (Coexist(x, leanna) -> Looted(x))\nforall x (Amnesty(x, leanna) and Amnesty(x, farica) -> Looted(farica))\nforall x (Coexist(x, leanna) -> Elucidate(leanna, farica))\nforall x (Custom(x) and Elucidate(x, farica) -> Coexist(x, farica))\n\nnot Custom(leanna)\n\nnot Custom(leanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The carma realize the giordano. The carma is based. The carma is untimbered. The carma is apomictic. The carma abnegate the giordano. The carma rewrite the giordano. The giordano realize the carma. If someone is apomictic then they like the giordano. If someone rewrite the carma then the carma is basic. If someone is apomictic and they like the giordano then they see the carma. If someone rewrite the giordano then they are untimbered. If someone abnegate the carma then they are apomictic. If someone rewrite the carma and they see the giordano then the giordano is apomictic. If someone abnegate the carma then the carma realize the giordano. If someone is noteworthy and they eat the giordano then they like the giordano. The giordano rewrite the giordano.", "logic": "\nRealize(carma, giordano)\nBased(carma)\nUntimbered(carma)\nApomictic(carma)\nAbnegate(carma, giordano)\nRewrite(carma, giordano)\nRealize(giordano, carma)\nforall x (Apomictic(x) -> Abnegate(x, giordano))\nforall x (Rewrite(x, carma) -> Basic(carma))\nforall x (Apomictic(x) and Abnegate(x, giordano) -> Rewrite(x, carma))\nforall x (Rewrite(x, giordano) -> Untimbered(x))\nforall x (Abnegate(x, carma) -> Apomictic(x))\nforall x (Rewrite(x, carma) and Rewrite(x, giordano) -> Apomictic(giordano))\nforall x (Abnegate(x, carma) -> Realize(carma, giordano))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) and Realize(x, giordano) -> Abnegate(x, giordano))\n\nRewrite(giordano, giordano)\n\nRewrite(giordano, giordano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The shantee pool the henka. The shantee is torturous. The shantee is lilting. The shantee is tethered. The shantee mastermind the henka. The shantee motorise the henka. The henka pool the shantee. If someone is tethered then they like the henka. If someone motorise the shantee then the shantee is distal. If someone is tethered and they like the henka then they see the shantee. If someone motorise the henka then they are lilting. If someone mastermind the shantee then they are tethered. If someone motorise the shantee and they see the henka then the henka is tethered. If someone mastermind the shantee then the shantee pool the henka. If someone is purplish and they eat the henka then they like the henka. The henka is not purplish.", "logic": "\nPool(shantee, henka)\nTorturous(shantee)\nLilting(shantee)\nTethered(shantee)\nMastermind(shantee, henka)\nMotorise(shantee, henka)\nPool(henka, shantee)\nforall x (Tethered(x) -> Mastermind(x, henka))\nforall x (Motorise(x, shantee) -> Distal(shantee))\nforall x (Tethered(x) and Mastermind(x, henka) -> Motorise(x, shantee))\nforall x (Motorise(x, henka) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Mastermind(x, shantee) -> Tethered(x))\nforall x (Motorise(x, shantee) and Motorise(x, henka) -> Tethered(henka))\nforall x (Mastermind(x, shantee) -> Pool(shantee, henka))\nforall x (Purplish(x) and Pool(x, henka) -> Mastermind(x, henka))\n\nnot Purplish(henka)\n\nnot Purplish(henka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "The lorenza stud the raynor. The lorenza is nagging. The lorenza is agamous. The lorenza is lxxv. The lorenza resurge the raynor. The lorenza swage the raynor. The raynor stud the lorenza. If someone is lxxv then they like the raynor. If someone swage the lorenza then the lorenza is puritanic. If someone is lxxv and they like the raynor then they see the lorenza. If someone swage the raynor then they are agamous. If someone resurge the lorenza then they are lxxv. If someone swage the lorenza and they see the raynor then the raynor is lxxv. If someone resurge the lorenza then the lorenza stud the raynor. If someone is disused and they eat the raynor then they like the raynor. The raynor stud the raynor.", "logic": "\nStud(lorenza, raynor)\nNagging(lorenza)\nAgamous(lorenza)\nLxxv(lorenza)\nResurge(lorenza, raynor)\nSwage(lorenza, raynor)\nStud(raynor, lorenza)\nforall x (Lxxv(x) -> Resurge(x, raynor))\nforall x (Swage(x, lorenza) -> Puritanic(lorenza))\nforall x (Lxxv(x) and Resurge(x, raynor) -> Swage(x, lorenza))\nforall x (Swage(x, raynor) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Resurge(x, lorenza) -> Lxxv(x))\nforall x (Swage(x, lorenza) and Swage(x, raynor) -> Lxxv(raynor))\nforall x (Resurge(x, lorenza) -> Stud(lorenza, raynor))\nforall x (Disused(x) and Stud(x, raynor) -> Resurge(x, raynor))\n\nStud(raynor, raynor)\n\nStud(raynor, raynor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-848"} {"premises": "Del is homing. Chaim is thirtieth. Furry things are functional. Chaim is thirtieth.", "logic": "\nHoming(del)\nThirtieth(chaim)\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) -> Functional(x))\n\nThirtieth(chaim)\n\ntherefore Thirtieth(chaim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Lorna is unsealed. Andrei is later. Furry things are extreme. Andrei is not later.", "logic": "\nUnsealed(lorna)\nLater(andrei)\nforall x (Later(x) -> Extreme(x))\n\nnot Later(andrei)\n\ntherefore Later(andrei)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Remus is thirsty. Wylma is unfathomed. Furry things are trashy. Wylma is trashy.", "logic": "\nThirsty(remus)\nUnfathomed(wylma)\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Trashy(x))\n\nTrashy(wylma)\n\nUnfathomed(wylma) and forall x (Unfathomed(x) -> Trashy(x)) -> therefore Trashy(wylma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Mara is tawny. Juergen is classical. Furry things are knowing. Juergen is not knowing.", "logic": "\nTawny(mara)\nClassical(juergen)\nforall x (Classical(x) -> Knowing(x))\n\nnot Knowing(juergen)\n\nClassical(juergen) and forall x (Classical(x) -> Knowing(x)) -> therefore Knowing(juergen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Blake is economic. Anatollo is chopped. Furry things are precatory. Blake is not precatory.", "logic": "\nEconomic(blake)\nChopped(anatollo)\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Precatory(x))\n\nnot Precatory(blake)\n\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Precatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Juliana is excitative. Kittie is unglazed. Furry things are capitalist. Kittie is round.", "logic": "\nExcitative(juliana)\nUnglazed(kittie)\nforall x (Unglazed(x) -> Capitalist(x))\n\nRound(kittie)\n\nRound(kittie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Jillayne is frightful. Martica is pendant. Furry things are original. Jillayne is not green.", "logic": "\nFrightful(jillayne)\nPendant(martica)\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> Original(x))\n\nnot Green(jillayne)\n\nnot Green(jillayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Sanford is alveolar. Viola is tuppeny. Furry things are circinate. Sanford is tuppeny.", "logic": "\nAlveolar(sanford)\nTuppeny(viola)\nforall x (Tuppeny(x) -> Circinate(x))\n\nTuppeny(sanford)\n\nTuppeny(sanford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1442"} {"premises": "Cindelyn is mordant. Cindelyn is local. Cindelyn is crabby. Cindelyn is pursuing. Cindelyn is biggish. Kally is banausic. Kally is mordant. Kally is local. Kally is cislunar. Kally is crabby. Kally is pursuing. Kally is biggish. Luella is banausic. Luella is mordant. Luella is cislunar. Luella is biggish. Rough, biggish things are crabby. If Luella is local then Luella is pursuing. If something is cislunar then it is local. Cindelyn is pursuing.", "logic": "\nMordant(cindelyn)\nLocal(cindelyn)\nCrabby(cindelyn)\nPursuing(cindelyn)\nBiggish(cindelyn)\nBanausic(kally)\nMordant(kally)\nLocal(kally)\nCislunar(kally)\nCrabby(kally)\nPursuing(kally)\nBiggish(kally)\nBanausic(luella)\nMordant(luella)\nCislunar(luella)\nBiggish(luella)\nforall x (Pursuing(x) and Biggish(x) -> Crabby(x))\nLocal(luella) -> Pursuing(luella)\nforall x (Cislunar(x) -> Local(x))\n\nPursuing(cindelyn)\n\ntherefore Pursuing(cindelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Amberly is amendable. Amberly is asphaltic. Amberly is unlovely. Amberly is tasselled. Amberly is glaciated. Melisa is acervate. Melisa is amendable. Melisa is asphaltic. Melisa is decided. Melisa is unlovely. Melisa is tasselled. Melisa is glaciated. Polly is acervate. Polly is amendable. Polly is decided. Polly is glaciated. Rough, glaciated things are unlovely. If Polly is asphaltic then Polly is tasselled. If something is decided then it is asphaltic. Melisa is not amendable.", "logic": "\nAmendable(amberly)\nAsphaltic(amberly)\nUnlovely(amberly)\nTasselled(amberly)\nGlaciated(amberly)\nAcervate(melisa)\nAmendable(melisa)\nAsphaltic(melisa)\nDecided(melisa)\nUnlovely(melisa)\nTasselled(melisa)\nGlaciated(melisa)\nAcervate(polly)\nAmendable(polly)\nDecided(polly)\nGlaciated(polly)\nforall x (Tasselled(x) and Glaciated(x) -> Unlovely(x))\nAsphaltic(polly) -> Tasselled(polly)\nforall x (Decided(x) -> Asphaltic(x))\n\nnot Amendable(melisa)\n\ntherefore Amendable(melisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Evette is entozoic. Evette is vestmented. Evette is mingy. Evette is calycine. Evette is bemused. Dwane is elysian. Dwane is entozoic. Dwane is vestmented. Dwane is dilettante. Dwane is mingy. Dwane is calycine. Dwane is bemused. Oswell is elysian. Oswell is entozoic. Oswell is dilettante. Oswell is bemused. Rough, bemused things are mingy. If Oswell is vestmented then Oswell is calycine. If something is dilettante then it is vestmented. Oswell is vestmented.", "logic": "\nEntozoic(evette)\nVestmented(evette)\nMingy(evette)\nCalycine(evette)\nBemused(evette)\nElysian(dwane)\nEntozoic(dwane)\nVestmented(dwane)\nDilettante(dwane)\nMingy(dwane)\nCalycine(dwane)\nBemused(dwane)\nElysian(oswell)\nEntozoic(oswell)\nDilettante(oswell)\nBemused(oswell)\nforall x (Calycine(x) and Bemused(x) -> Mingy(x))\nVestmented(oswell) -> Calycine(oswell)\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> Vestmented(x))\n\nVestmented(oswell)\n\nDilettante(oswell) and forall x (Dilettante(x) -> Vestmented(x)) -> therefore Vestmented(oswell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Inigo is reverting. Inigo is silicious. Inigo is connected. Inigo is auxiliary. Inigo is immemorial. Keil is opaque. Keil is reverting. Keil is silicious. Keil is regulative. Keil is connected. Keil is auxiliary. Keil is immemorial. Aub is opaque. Aub is reverting. Aub is regulative. Aub is immemorial. Rough, immemorial things are connected. If Aub is silicious then Aub is auxiliary. If something is regulative then it is silicious. Aub is not silicious.", "logic": "\nReverting(inigo)\nSilicious(inigo)\nConnected(inigo)\nAuxiliary(inigo)\nImmemorial(inigo)\nOpaque(keil)\nReverting(keil)\nSilicious(keil)\nRegulative(keil)\nConnected(keil)\nAuxiliary(keil)\nImmemorial(keil)\nOpaque(aub)\nReverting(aub)\nRegulative(aub)\nImmemorial(aub)\nforall x (Auxiliary(x) and Immemorial(x) -> Connected(x))\nSilicious(aub) -> Auxiliary(aub)\nforall x (Regulative(x) -> Silicious(x))\n\nnot Silicious(aub)\n\nRegulative(aub) and forall x (Regulative(x) -> Silicious(x)) -> therefore Silicious(aub)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Susie is rowdy. Susie is calico. Susie is reflexed. Susie is phonetic. Susie is satellite. Skipp is obsessed. Skipp is rowdy. Skipp is calico. Skipp is cervical. Skipp is reflexed. Skipp is phonetic. Skipp is satellite. Pincas is obsessed. Pincas is rowdy. Pincas is cervical. Pincas is satellite. Rough, satellite things are reflexed. If Pincas is calico then Pincas is phonetic. If something is cervical then it is calico. Pincas is phonetic.", "logic": "\nRowdy(susie)\nCalico(susie)\nReflexed(susie)\nPhonetic(susie)\nSatellite(susie)\nObsessed(skipp)\nRowdy(skipp)\nCalico(skipp)\nCervical(skipp)\nReflexed(skipp)\nPhonetic(skipp)\nSatellite(skipp)\nObsessed(pincas)\nRowdy(pincas)\nCervical(pincas)\nSatellite(pincas)\nforall x (Phonetic(x) and Satellite(x) -> Reflexed(x))\nCalico(pincas) -> Phonetic(pincas)\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Calico(x))\n\nPhonetic(pincas)\n\nCervical(pincas) and forall x (Cervical(x) -> Calico(x)) -> therefore Calico(pincas) Calico(pincas) and Calico(pincas) -> Phonetic(pincas) -> therefore Phonetic(pincas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Rob is exogamic. Rob is fizzing. Rob is homonymous. Rob is bardic. Rob is dished. Barty is bentonitic. Barty is exogamic. Barty is fizzing. Barty is xenophobic. Barty is homonymous. Barty is bardic. Barty is dished. Ester is bentonitic. Ester is exogamic. Ester is xenophobic. Ester is dished. Rough, dished things are homonymous. If Ester is fizzing then Ester is bardic. If something is xenophobic then it is fizzing. Ester is not bardic.", "logic": "\nExogamic(rob)\nFizzing(rob)\nHomonymous(rob)\nBardic(rob)\nDished(rob)\nBentonitic(barty)\nExogamic(barty)\nFizzing(barty)\nXenophobic(barty)\nHomonymous(barty)\nBardic(barty)\nDished(barty)\nBentonitic(ester)\nExogamic(ester)\nXenophobic(ester)\nDished(ester)\nforall x (Bardic(x) and Dished(x) -> Homonymous(x))\nFizzing(ester) -> Bardic(ester)\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) -> Fizzing(x))\n\nnot Bardic(ester)\n\nXenophobic(ester) and forall x (Xenophobic(x) -> Fizzing(x)) -> therefore Fizzing(ester) Fizzing(ester) and Fizzing(ester) -> Bardic(ester) -> therefore Bardic(ester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Corina is slangy. Corina is mocking. Corina is fruticose. Corina is unowned. Corina is wanton. Dianne is congealed. Dianne is slangy. Dianne is mocking. Dianne is reverent. Dianne is fruticose. Dianne is unowned. Dianne is wanton. Seka is congealed. Seka is slangy. Seka is reverent. Seka is wanton. Rough, wanton things are fruticose. If Seka is mocking then Seka is unowned. If something is reverent then it is mocking. Seka is fruticose.", "logic": "\nSlangy(corina)\nMocking(corina)\nFruticose(corina)\nUnowned(corina)\nWanton(corina)\nCongealed(dianne)\nSlangy(dianne)\nMocking(dianne)\nReverent(dianne)\nFruticose(dianne)\nUnowned(dianne)\nWanton(dianne)\nCongealed(seka)\nSlangy(seka)\nReverent(seka)\nWanton(seka)\nforall x (Unowned(x) and Wanton(x) -> Fruticose(x))\nMocking(seka) -> Unowned(seka)\nforall x (Reverent(x) -> Mocking(x))\n\nFruticose(seka)\n\nReverent(seka) and forall x (Reverent(x) -> Mocking(x)) -> therefore Mocking(seka) Mocking(seka) and Mocking(seka) -> Unowned(seka) -> therefore Unowned(seka) Unowned(seka) and Wanton(seka) and forall x (Unowned(x) and Wanton(x) -> Fruticose(x)) -> therefore Fruticose(seka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Rasla is choosy. Rasla is brumous. Rasla is revealing. Rasla is biomedical. Rasla is innumerate. Bren is dogged. Bren is choosy. Bren is brumous. Bren is highbrow. Bren is revealing. Bren is biomedical. Bren is innumerate. Cammi is dogged. Cammi is choosy. Cammi is highbrow. Cammi is innumerate. Rough, innumerate things are revealing. If Cammi is brumous then Cammi is biomedical. If something is highbrow then it is brumous. Cammi is not revealing.", "logic": "\nChoosy(rasla)\nBrumous(rasla)\nRevealing(rasla)\nBiomedical(rasla)\nInnumerate(rasla)\nDogged(bren)\nChoosy(bren)\nBrumous(bren)\nHighbrow(bren)\nRevealing(bren)\nBiomedical(bren)\nInnumerate(bren)\nDogged(cammi)\nChoosy(cammi)\nHighbrow(cammi)\nInnumerate(cammi)\nforall x (Biomedical(x) and Innumerate(x) -> Revealing(x))\nBrumous(cammi) -> Biomedical(cammi)\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Brumous(x))\n\nnot Revealing(cammi)\n\nHighbrow(cammi) and forall x (Highbrow(x) -> Brumous(x)) -> therefore Brumous(cammi) Brumous(cammi) and Brumous(cammi) -> Biomedical(cammi) -> therefore Biomedical(cammi) Biomedical(cammi) and Innumerate(cammi) and forall x (Biomedical(x) and Innumerate(x) -> Revealing(x)) -> therefore Revealing(cammi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Chanda is credited. Chanda is unlisted. Chanda is stock. Chanda is saturnine. Chanda is endemical. Fred is skimmed. Fred is credited. Fred is unlisted. Fred is pineal. Fred is stock. Fred is saturnine. Fred is endemical. Ivie is skimmed. Ivie is credited. Ivie is pineal. Ivie is endemical. Rough, endemical things are stock. If Ivie is unlisted then Ivie is saturnine. If something is pineal then it is unlisted. Chanda is not skimmed.", "logic": "\nCredited(chanda)\nUnlisted(chanda)\nStock(chanda)\nSaturnine(chanda)\nEndemical(chanda)\nSkimmed(fred)\nCredited(fred)\nUnlisted(fred)\nPineal(fred)\nStock(fred)\nSaturnine(fred)\nEndemical(fred)\nSkimmed(ivie)\nCredited(ivie)\nPineal(ivie)\nEndemical(ivie)\nforall x (Saturnine(x) and Endemical(x) -> Stock(x))\nUnlisted(ivie) -> Saturnine(ivie)\nforall x (Pineal(x) -> Unlisted(x))\n\nnot Skimmed(chanda)\n\nnot Skimmed(chanda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Christi is pudgy. Christi is organized. Christi is tenured. Christi is equipotent. Christi is sugared. Amargo is gamey. Amargo is pudgy. Amargo is organized. Amargo is sterilised. Amargo is tenured. Amargo is equipotent. Amargo is sugared. Enrica is gamey. Enrica is pudgy. Enrica is sterilised. Enrica is sugared. Rough, sugared things are tenured. If Enrica is organized then Enrica is equipotent. If something is sterilised then it is organized. Christi is sterilised.", "logic": "\nPudgy(christi)\nOrganized(christi)\nTenured(christi)\nEquipotent(christi)\nSugared(christi)\nGamey(amargo)\nPudgy(amargo)\nOrganized(amargo)\nSterilised(amargo)\nTenured(amargo)\nEquipotent(amargo)\nSugared(amargo)\nGamey(enrica)\nPudgy(enrica)\nSterilised(enrica)\nSugared(enrica)\nforall x (Equipotent(x) and Sugared(x) -> Tenured(x))\nOrganized(enrica) -> Equipotent(enrica)\nforall x (Sterilised(x) -> Organized(x))\n\nSterilised(christi)\n\nSterilised(christi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-598"} {"premises": "Charlene is attenuate. Charlene is propellent. Charlene is dressy. Charlene is precordial. Charlene is resonant. Charlene is malicious. Jack is propellent. Jack is resonant. Pia is attenuate. Pia is propellent. Pia is precordial. Pia is resonant. Pia is malicious. Naomi is dressy. Naomi is malicious. If someone is propellent and precordial then they are malicious. If someone is propellent then they are malicious. Smart, precordial people are propellent. If someone is dressy then they are resonant. If someone is dressy and precordial then they are malicious. If someone is resonant and propellent then they are unpromised. Pia is propellent.", "logic": "\nAttenuate(charlene)\nPropellent(charlene)\nDressy(charlene)\nPrecordial(charlene)\nResonant(charlene)\nMalicious(charlene)\nPropellent(jack)\nResonant(jack)\nAttenuate(pia)\nPropellent(pia)\nPrecordial(pia)\nResonant(pia)\nMalicious(pia)\nDressy(naomi)\nMalicious(naomi)\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Precordial(x) -> Malicious(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) -> Malicious(x))\nforall x (Malicious(x) and Precordial(x) -> Propellent(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) -> Resonant(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) and Precordial(x) -> Malicious(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) and Propellent(x) -> Unpromised(x))\n\nPropellent(pia)\n\ntherefore Propellent(pia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Doug is hilly. Doug is bowlegged. Doug is smarmy. Doug is lithe. Doug is inveterate. Doug is vindicated. Lotte is bowlegged. Lotte is inveterate. Esteban is hilly. Esteban is bowlegged. Esteban is lithe. Esteban is inveterate. Esteban is vindicated. Eddi is smarmy. Eddi is vindicated. If someone is bowlegged and lithe then they are vindicated. If someone is bowlegged then they are vindicated. Smart, lithe people are bowlegged. If someone is smarmy then they are inveterate. If someone is smarmy and lithe then they are vindicated. If someone is inveterate and bowlegged then they are annoying. Esteban is not lithe.", "logic": "\nHilly(doug)\nBowlegged(doug)\nSmarmy(doug)\nLithe(doug)\nInveterate(doug)\nVindicated(doug)\nBowlegged(lotte)\nInveterate(lotte)\nHilly(esteban)\nBowlegged(esteban)\nLithe(esteban)\nInveterate(esteban)\nVindicated(esteban)\nSmarmy(eddi)\nVindicated(eddi)\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) and Lithe(x) -> Vindicated(x))\nforall x (Bowlegged(x) -> Vindicated(x))\nforall x (Vindicated(x) and Lithe(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) -> Inveterate(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) and Lithe(x) -> Vindicated(x))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) and Bowlegged(x) -> Annoying(x))\n\nnot Lithe(esteban)\n\ntherefore Lithe(esteban)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Myke is rattling. Myke is rife. Myke is positivist. Myke is bovine. Myke is greyish. Myke is sepaloid. Lorenza is rife. Lorenza is greyish. Gilly is rattling. Gilly is rife. Gilly is bovine. Gilly is greyish. Gilly is sepaloid. Homer is positivist. Homer is sepaloid. If someone is rife and bovine then they are sepaloid. If someone is rife then they are sepaloid. Smart, bovine people are rife. If someone is positivist then they are greyish. If someone is positivist and bovine then they are sepaloid. If someone is greyish and rife then they are curving. Gilly is curving.", "logic": "\nRattling(myke)\nRife(myke)\nPositivist(myke)\nBovine(myke)\nGreyish(myke)\nSepaloid(myke)\nRife(lorenza)\nGreyish(lorenza)\nRattling(gilly)\nRife(gilly)\nBovine(gilly)\nGreyish(gilly)\nSepaloid(gilly)\nPositivist(homer)\nSepaloid(homer)\nforall x (Rife(x) and Bovine(x) -> Sepaloid(x))\nforall x (Rife(x) -> Sepaloid(x))\nforall x (Sepaloid(x) and Bovine(x) -> Rife(x))\nforall x (Positivist(x) -> Greyish(x))\nforall x (Positivist(x) and Bovine(x) -> Sepaloid(x))\nforall x (Greyish(x) and Rife(x) -> Curving(x))\n\nCurving(gilly)\n\nGreyish(gilly) and Rife(gilly) and forall x (Greyish(x) and Rife(x) -> Curving(x)) -> therefore Curving(gilly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Shaylyn is eighth. Shaylyn is highbrowed. Shaylyn is agone. Shaylyn is moderate. Shaylyn is acinous. Shaylyn is aortal. Bartie is highbrowed. Bartie is acinous. Alwin is eighth. Alwin is highbrowed. Alwin is moderate. Alwin is acinous. Alwin is aortal. Merry is agone. Merry is aortal. If someone is highbrowed and moderate then they are aortal. If someone is highbrowed then they are aortal. Smart, moderate people are highbrowed. If someone is agone then they are acinous. If someone is agone and moderate then they are aortal. If someone is acinous and highbrowed then they are uncombable. Alwin is not uncombable.", "logic": "\nEighth(shaylyn)\nHighbrowed(shaylyn)\nAgone(shaylyn)\nModerate(shaylyn)\nAcinous(shaylyn)\nAortal(shaylyn)\nHighbrowed(bartie)\nAcinous(bartie)\nEighth(alwin)\nHighbrowed(alwin)\nModerate(alwin)\nAcinous(alwin)\nAortal(alwin)\nAgone(merry)\nAortal(merry)\nforall x (Highbrowed(x) and Moderate(x) -> Aortal(x))\nforall x (Highbrowed(x) -> Aortal(x))\nforall x (Aortal(x) and Moderate(x) -> Highbrowed(x))\nforall x (Agone(x) -> Acinous(x))\nforall x (Agone(x) and Moderate(x) -> Aortal(x))\nforall x (Acinous(x) and Highbrowed(x) -> Uncombable(x))\n\nnot Uncombable(alwin)\n\nAcinous(alwin) and Highbrowed(alwin) and forall x (Acinous(x) and Highbrowed(x) -> Uncombable(x)) -> therefore Uncombable(alwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Nikolia is earlyish. Nikolia is dumfounded. Nikolia is galilean. Nikolia is scowling. Nikolia is lanate. Nikolia is unheeded. Adolfo is dumfounded. Adolfo is lanate. Kaitlynn is earlyish. Kaitlynn is dumfounded. Kaitlynn is scowling. Kaitlynn is lanate. Kaitlynn is unheeded. Zackariah is galilean. Zackariah is unheeded. If someone is dumfounded and scowling then they are unheeded. If someone is dumfounded then they are unheeded. Smart, scowling people are dumfounded. If someone is galilean then they are lanate. If someone is galilean and scowling then they are unheeded. If someone is lanate and dumfounded then they are desirous. Zackariah is not dumfounded.", "logic": "\nEarlyish(nikolia)\nDumfounded(nikolia)\nGalilean(nikolia)\nScowling(nikolia)\nLanate(nikolia)\nUnheeded(nikolia)\nDumfounded(adolfo)\nLanate(adolfo)\nEarlyish(kaitlynn)\nDumfounded(kaitlynn)\nScowling(kaitlynn)\nLanate(kaitlynn)\nUnheeded(kaitlynn)\nGalilean(zackariah)\nUnheeded(zackariah)\nforall x (Dumfounded(x) and Scowling(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Dumfounded(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Unheeded(x) and Scowling(x) -> Dumfounded(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) -> Lanate(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) and Scowling(x) -> Unheeded(x))\nforall x (Lanate(x) and Dumfounded(x) -> Desirous(x))\n\nnot Dumfounded(zackariah)\n\nforall x (Unheeded(x) and Scowling(x) -> Dumfounded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Alexine is priceless. Alexine is rampageous. Alexine is addible. Alexine is unhappy. Alexine is ungusseted. Alexine is boneheaded. Blondy is rampageous. Blondy is ungusseted. Faun is priceless. Faun is rampageous. Faun is unhappy. Faun is ungusseted. Faun is boneheaded. Chance is addible. Chance is boneheaded. If someone is rampageous and unhappy then they are boneheaded. If someone is rampageous then they are boneheaded. Smart, unhappy people are rampageous. If someone is addible then they are ungusseted. If someone is addible and unhappy then they are boneheaded. If someone is ungusseted and rampageous then they are veritable. Chance is veritable.", "logic": "\nPriceless(alexine)\nRampageous(alexine)\nAddible(alexine)\nUnhappy(alexine)\nUngusseted(alexine)\nBoneheaded(alexine)\nRampageous(blondy)\nUngusseted(blondy)\nPriceless(faun)\nRampageous(faun)\nUnhappy(faun)\nUngusseted(faun)\nBoneheaded(faun)\nAddible(chance)\nBoneheaded(chance)\nforall x (Rampageous(x) and Unhappy(x) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Rampageous(x) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Boneheaded(x) and Unhappy(x) -> Rampageous(x))\nforall x (Addible(x) -> Ungusseted(x))\nforall x (Addible(x) and Unhappy(x) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and Rampageous(x) -> Veritable(x))\n\nVeritable(chance)\n\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and Rampageous(x) -> Veritable(x)) <- forall x (Boneheaded(x) and Unhappy(x) -> Rampageous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Leone is midweekly. Leone is narcotized. Leone is potted. Leone is billowing. Leone is thickened. Leone is bubaline. Karon is narcotized. Karon is thickened. Morgana is midweekly. Morgana is narcotized. Morgana is billowing. Morgana is thickened. Morgana is bubaline. Aguste is potted. Aguste is bubaline. If someone is narcotized and billowing then they are bubaline. If someone is narcotized then they are bubaline. Smart, billowing people are narcotized. If someone is potted then they are thickened. If someone is potted and billowing then they are bubaline. If someone is thickened and narcotized then they are heated. Karon is not potted.", "logic": "\nMidweekly(leone)\nNarcotized(leone)\nPotted(leone)\nBillowing(leone)\nThickened(leone)\nBubaline(leone)\nNarcotized(karon)\nThickened(karon)\nMidweekly(morgana)\nNarcotized(morgana)\nBillowing(morgana)\nThickened(morgana)\nBubaline(morgana)\nPotted(aguste)\nBubaline(aguste)\nforall x (Narcotized(x) and Billowing(x) -> Bubaline(x))\nforall x (Narcotized(x) -> Bubaline(x))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) and Billowing(x) -> Narcotized(x))\nforall x (Potted(x) -> Thickened(x))\nforall x (Potted(x) and Billowing(x) -> Bubaline(x))\nforall x (Thickened(x) and Narcotized(x) -> Heated(x))\n\nnot Potted(karon)\n\nnot Potted(karon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Brynne is cotyloidal. Brynne is runny. Brynne is braless. Brynne is citrous. Brynne is artistic. Brynne is quartzose. Kordula is runny. Kordula is artistic. Harman is cotyloidal. Harman is runny. Harman is citrous. Harman is artistic. Harman is quartzose. Jordon is braless. Jordon is quartzose. If someone is runny and citrous then they are quartzose. If someone is runny then they are quartzose. Smart, citrous people are runny. If someone is braless then they are artistic. If someone is braless and citrous then they are quartzose. If someone is artistic and runny then they are posh. Jordon is cotyloidal.", "logic": "\nCotyloidal(brynne)\nRunny(brynne)\nBraless(brynne)\nCitrous(brynne)\nArtistic(brynne)\nQuartzose(brynne)\nRunny(kordula)\nArtistic(kordula)\nCotyloidal(harman)\nRunny(harman)\nCitrous(harman)\nArtistic(harman)\nQuartzose(harman)\nBraless(jordon)\nQuartzose(jordon)\nforall x (Runny(x) and Citrous(x) -> Quartzose(x))\nforall x (Runny(x) -> Quartzose(x))\nforall x (Quartzose(x) and Citrous(x) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Braless(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Braless(x) and Citrous(x) -> Quartzose(x))\nforall x (Artistic(x) and Runny(x) -> Posh(x))\n\nCotyloidal(jordon)\n\nCotyloidal(jordon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-230"} {"premises": "Wyn is not united. Wyn is thespian. Wyn is stinking. Wyn is squat. Trip is shoed. Trip is united. Trip is stinking. Damon is not shoed. Damon is not thespian. Damon is stinking. Damon is squat. Florida is united. Florida is not stinking. Florida is manx. Florida is squat. If someone is shared and manx then they are thespian. If someone is squat and not stinking then they are thespian. If someone is united and shoed then they are thespian. If someone is united and not shoed then they are not manx. Kind, stinking people are manx. All manx, stinking people are squat. All manx people are squat. If someone is united and squat then they are shared. Florida is united.", "logic": "\nnot United(wyn)\nThespian(wyn)\nStinking(wyn)\nSquat(wyn)\nShoed(trip)\nUnited(trip)\nStinking(trip)\nnot Shoed(damon)\nnot Thespian(damon)\nStinking(damon)\nSquat(damon)\nUnited(florida)\nnot Stinking(florida)\nManx(florida)\nSquat(florida)\nforall x (Shared(x) and Manx(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (Squat(x) and not Stinking(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (United(x) and Shoed(x) -> Thespian(x))\nforall x (United(x) and not Shoed(x) -> not Manx(x))\nforall x (Thespian(x) and Stinking(x) -> Manx(x))\nforall x (Manx(x) and Stinking(x) -> Squat(x))\nforall x (Manx(x) -> Squat(x))\nforall x (United(x) and Squat(x) -> Shared(x))\n\nUnited(florida)\n\ntherefore United(florida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Greggory is not uveal. Greggory is travelable. Greggory is fatheaded. Greggory is fulgid. Thain is inst. Thain is uveal. Thain is fatheaded. Miguel is not inst. Miguel is not travelable. Miguel is fatheaded. Miguel is fulgid. Darcy is uveal. Darcy is not fatheaded. Darcy is arrhythmic. Darcy is fulgid. If someone is vanished and arrhythmic then they are travelable. If someone is fulgid and not fatheaded then they are travelable. If someone is uveal and inst then they are travelable. If someone is uveal and not inst then they are not arrhythmic. Kind, fatheaded people are arrhythmic. All arrhythmic, fatheaded people are fulgid. All arrhythmic people are fulgid. If someone is uveal and fulgid then they are vanished. Darcy is not arrhythmic.", "logic": "\nnot Uveal(greggory)\nTravelable(greggory)\nFatheaded(greggory)\nFulgid(greggory)\nInst(thain)\nUveal(thain)\nFatheaded(thain)\nnot Inst(miguel)\nnot Travelable(miguel)\nFatheaded(miguel)\nFulgid(miguel)\nUveal(darcy)\nnot Fatheaded(darcy)\nArrhythmic(darcy)\nFulgid(darcy)\nforall x (Vanished(x) and Arrhythmic(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) and not Fatheaded(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Uveal(x) and Inst(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Uveal(x) and not Inst(x) -> not Arrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Travelable(x) and Fatheaded(x) -> Arrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) and Fatheaded(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nforall x (Uveal(x) and Fulgid(x) -> Vanished(x))\n\nnot Arrhythmic(darcy)\n\ntherefore Arrhythmic(darcy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Zolly is not waxlike. Zolly is dualistic. Zolly is underwater. Zolly is prompt. Lauree is walleyed. Lauree is waxlike. Lauree is underwater. Osbourne is not walleyed. Osbourne is not dualistic. Osbourne is underwater. Osbourne is prompt. Charmaine is waxlike. Charmaine is not underwater. Charmaine is dominated. Charmaine is prompt. If someone is spattered and dominated then they are dualistic. If someone is prompt and not underwater then they are dualistic. If someone is waxlike and walleyed then they are dualistic. If someone is waxlike and not walleyed then they are not dominated. Kind, underwater people are dominated. All dominated, underwater people are prompt. All dominated people are prompt. If someone is waxlike and prompt then they are spattered. Charmaine is spattered.", "logic": "\nnot Waxlike(zolly)\nDualistic(zolly)\nUnderwater(zolly)\nPrompt(zolly)\nWalleyed(lauree)\nWaxlike(lauree)\nUnderwater(lauree)\nnot Walleyed(osbourne)\nnot Dualistic(osbourne)\nUnderwater(osbourne)\nPrompt(osbourne)\nWaxlike(charmaine)\nnot Underwater(charmaine)\nDominated(charmaine)\nPrompt(charmaine)\nforall x (Spattered(x) and Dominated(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Prompt(x) and not Underwater(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and Walleyed(x) -> Dualistic(x))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and not Walleyed(x) -> not Dominated(x))\nforall x (Dualistic(x) and Underwater(x) -> Dominated(x))\nforall x (Dominated(x) and Underwater(x) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Dominated(x) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and Prompt(x) -> Spattered(x))\n\nSpattered(charmaine)\n\nWaxlike(charmaine) and Prompt(charmaine) and forall x (Waxlike(x) and Prompt(x) -> Spattered(x)) -> therefore Spattered(charmaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Averill is not urgent. Averill is dainty. Averill is pudendal. Averill is terminable. Benn is nutrient. Benn is urgent. Benn is pudendal. Joli is not nutrient. Joli is not dainty. Joli is pudendal. Joli is terminable. Vaughan is urgent. Vaughan is not pudendal. Vaughan is alexic. Vaughan is terminable. If someone is viewless and alexic then they are dainty. If someone is terminable and not pudendal then they are dainty. If someone is urgent and nutrient then they are dainty. If someone is urgent and not nutrient then they are not alexic. Kind, pudendal people are alexic. All alexic, pudendal people are terminable. All alexic people are terminable. If someone is urgent and terminable then they are viewless. Averill is not alexic.", "logic": "\nnot Urgent(averill)\nDainty(averill)\nPudendal(averill)\nTerminable(averill)\nNutrient(benn)\nUrgent(benn)\nPudendal(benn)\nnot Nutrient(joli)\nnot Dainty(joli)\nPudendal(joli)\nTerminable(joli)\nUrgent(vaughan)\nnot Pudendal(vaughan)\nAlexic(vaughan)\nTerminable(vaughan)\nforall x (Viewless(x) and Alexic(x) -> Dainty(x))\nforall x (Terminable(x) and not Pudendal(x) -> Dainty(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) and Nutrient(x) -> Dainty(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) and not Nutrient(x) -> not Alexic(x))\nforall x (Dainty(x) and Pudendal(x) -> Alexic(x))\nforall x (Alexic(x) and Pudendal(x) -> Terminable(x))\nforall x (Alexic(x) -> Terminable(x))\nforall x (Urgent(x) and Terminable(x) -> Viewless(x))\n\nnot Alexic(averill)\n\nDainty(averill) and Pudendal(averill) and forall x (Dainty(x) and Pudendal(x) -> Alexic(x)) -> therefore Alexic(averill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Lilias is not homemade. Lilias is anuric. Lilias is dragging. Lilias is synaptic. Janeta is cyclonic. Janeta is homemade. Janeta is dragging. Carrissa is not cyclonic. Carrissa is not anuric. Carrissa is dragging. Carrissa is synaptic. Kellyann is homemade. Kellyann is not dragging. Kellyann is untruthful. Kellyann is synaptic. If someone is petaled and untruthful then they are anuric. If someone is synaptic and not dragging then they are anuric. If someone is homemade and cyclonic then they are anuric. If someone is homemade and not cyclonic then they are not untruthful. Kind, dragging people are untruthful. All untruthful, dragging people are synaptic. All untruthful people are synaptic. If someone is homemade and synaptic then they are petaled. Janeta is untruthful.", "logic": "\nnot Homemade(lilias)\nAnuric(lilias)\nDragging(lilias)\nSynaptic(lilias)\nCyclonic(janeta)\nHomemade(janeta)\nDragging(janeta)\nnot Cyclonic(carrissa)\nnot Anuric(carrissa)\nDragging(carrissa)\nSynaptic(carrissa)\nHomemade(kellyann)\nnot Dragging(kellyann)\nUntruthful(kellyann)\nSynaptic(kellyann)\nforall x (Petaled(x) and Untruthful(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Synaptic(x) and not Dragging(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Homemade(x) and Cyclonic(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Homemade(x) and not Cyclonic(x) -> not Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Anuric(x) and Dragging(x) -> Untruthful(x))\nforall x (Untruthful(x) and Dragging(x) -> Synaptic(x))\nforall x (Untruthful(x) -> Synaptic(x))\nforall x (Homemade(x) and Synaptic(x) -> Petaled(x))\n\nUntruthful(janeta)\n\nHomemade(janeta) and Cyclonic(janeta) and forall x (Homemade(x) and Cyclonic(x) -> Anuric(x)) -> therefore Anuric(janeta) Anuric(janeta) and Dragging(janeta) and forall x (Anuric(x) and Dragging(x) -> Untruthful(x)) -> therefore Untruthful(janeta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Phineas is not ducal. Phineas is missed. Phineas is adipose. Phineas is plumping. Gunvor is entire. Gunvor is ducal. Gunvor is adipose. Roseann is not entire. Roseann is not missed. Roseann is adipose. Roseann is plumping. Sofia is ducal. Sofia is not adipose. Sofia is frequent. Sofia is plumping. If someone is outre and frequent then they are missed. If someone is plumping and not adipose then they are missed. If someone is ducal and entire then they are missed. If someone is ducal and not entire then they are not frequent. Kind, adipose people are frequent. All frequent, adipose people are plumping. All frequent people are plumping. If someone is ducal and plumping then they are outre. Gunvor is not frequent.", "logic": "\nnot Ducal(phineas)\nMissed(phineas)\nAdipose(phineas)\nPlumping(phineas)\nEntire(gunvor)\nDucal(gunvor)\nAdipose(gunvor)\nnot Entire(roseann)\nnot Missed(roseann)\nAdipose(roseann)\nPlumping(roseann)\nDucal(sofia)\nnot Adipose(sofia)\nFrequent(sofia)\nPlumping(sofia)\nforall x (Outre(x) and Frequent(x) -> Missed(x))\nforall x (Plumping(x) and not Adipose(x) -> Missed(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) and Entire(x) -> Missed(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) and not Entire(x) -> not Frequent(x))\nforall x (Missed(x) and Adipose(x) -> Frequent(x))\nforall x (Frequent(x) and Adipose(x) -> Plumping(x))\nforall x (Frequent(x) -> Plumping(x))\nforall x (Ducal(x) and Plumping(x) -> Outre(x))\n\nnot Frequent(gunvor)\n\nDucal(gunvor) and Entire(gunvor) and forall x (Ducal(x) and Entire(x) -> Missed(x)) -> therefore Missed(gunvor) Missed(gunvor) and Adipose(gunvor) and forall x (Missed(x) and Adipose(x) -> Frequent(x)) -> therefore Frequent(gunvor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Odille is not ovate. Odille is plangent. Odille is retinal. Odille is angelical. Aila is motherly. Aila is ovate. Aila is retinal. Margaret is not motherly. Margaret is not plangent. Margaret is retinal. Margaret is angelical. Fredelia is ovate. Fredelia is not retinal. Fredelia is epenthetic. Fredelia is angelical. If someone is mussy and epenthetic then they are plangent. If someone is angelical and not retinal then they are plangent. If someone is ovate and motherly then they are plangent. If someone is ovate and not motherly then they are not epenthetic. Kind, retinal people are epenthetic. All epenthetic, retinal people are angelical. All epenthetic people are angelical. If someone is ovate and angelical then they are mussy. Aila is angelical.", "logic": "\nnot Ovate(odille)\nPlangent(odille)\nRetinal(odille)\nAngelical(odille)\nMotherly(aila)\nOvate(aila)\nRetinal(aila)\nnot Motherly(margaret)\nnot Plangent(margaret)\nRetinal(margaret)\nAngelical(margaret)\nOvate(fredelia)\nnot Retinal(fredelia)\nEpenthetic(fredelia)\nAngelical(fredelia)\nforall x (Mussy(x) and Epenthetic(x) -> Plangent(x))\nforall x (Angelical(x) and not Retinal(x) -> Plangent(x))\nforall x (Ovate(x) and Motherly(x) -> Plangent(x))\nforall x (Ovate(x) and not Motherly(x) -> not Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Plangent(x) and Retinal(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Epenthetic(x) and Retinal(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Epenthetic(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Ovate(x) and Angelical(x) -> Mussy(x))\n\nAngelical(aila)\n\nOvate(aila) and Motherly(aila) and forall x (Ovate(x) and Motherly(x) -> Plangent(x)) -> therefore Plangent(aila) Plangent(aila) and Retinal(aila) and forall x (Plangent(x) and Retinal(x) -> Epenthetic(x)) -> therefore Epenthetic(aila) Epenthetic(aila) and forall x (Epenthetic(x) -> Angelical(x)) -> therefore Angelical(aila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Adolfo is not unstylish. Adolfo is falconine. Adolfo is inarguable. Adolfo is possible. Flossy is endemic. Flossy is unstylish. Flossy is inarguable. Imogene is not endemic. Imogene is not falconine. Imogene is inarguable. Imogene is possible. Izabel is unstylish. Izabel is not inarguable. Izabel is costive. Izabel is possible. If someone is doubtful and costive then they are falconine. If someone is possible and not inarguable then they are falconine. If someone is unstylish and endemic then they are falconine. If someone is unstylish and not endemic then they are not costive. Kind, inarguable people are costive. All costive, inarguable people are possible. All costive people are possible. If someone is unstylish and possible then they are doubtful. Flossy is not possible.", "logic": "\nnot Unstylish(adolfo)\nFalconine(adolfo)\nInarguable(adolfo)\nPossible(adolfo)\nEndemic(flossy)\nUnstylish(flossy)\nInarguable(flossy)\nnot Endemic(imogene)\nnot Falconine(imogene)\nInarguable(imogene)\nPossible(imogene)\nUnstylish(izabel)\nnot Inarguable(izabel)\nCostive(izabel)\nPossible(izabel)\nforall x (Doubtful(x) and Costive(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Possible(x) and not Inarguable(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Unstylish(x) and Endemic(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Unstylish(x) and not Endemic(x) -> not Costive(x))\nforall x (Falconine(x) and Inarguable(x) -> Costive(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) and Inarguable(x) -> Possible(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Possible(x))\nforall x (Unstylish(x) and Possible(x) -> Doubtful(x))\n\nnot Possible(flossy)\n\nUnstylish(flossy) and Endemic(flossy) and forall x (Unstylish(x) and Endemic(x) -> Falconine(x)) -> therefore Falconine(flossy) Falconine(flossy) and Inarguable(flossy) and forall x (Falconine(x) and Inarguable(x) -> Costive(x)) -> therefore Costive(flossy) Costive(flossy) and forall x (Costive(x) -> Possible(x)) -> therefore Possible(flossy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Demeter is not oneiric. Demeter is perturbed. Demeter is unsworn. Demeter is ferial. Hewie is balzacian. Hewie is oneiric. Hewie is unsworn. Ichabod is not balzacian. Ichabod is not perturbed. Ichabod is unsworn. Ichabod is ferial. Amalee is oneiric. Amalee is not unsworn. Amalee is automotive. Amalee is ferial. If someone is shockable and automotive then they are perturbed. If someone is ferial and not unsworn then they are perturbed. If someone is oneiric and balzacian then they are perturbed. If someone is oneiric and not balzacian then they are not automotive. Kind, unsworn people are automotive. All automotive, unsworn people are ferial. All automotive people are ferial. If someone is oneiric and ferial then they are shockable. Ichabod is not automotive.", "logic": "\nnot Oneiric(demeter)\nPerturbed(demeter)\nUnsworn(demeter)\nFerial(demeter)\nBalzacian(hewie)\nOneiric(hewie)\nUnsworn(hewie)\nnot Balzacian(ichabod)\nnot Perturbed(ichabod)\nUnsworn(ichabod)\nFerial(ichabod)\nOneiric(amalee)\nnot Unsworn(amalee)\nAutomotive(amalee)\nFerial(amalee)\nforall x (Shockable(x) and Automotive(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Ferial(x) and not Unsworn(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Balzacian(x) -> Perturbed(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and not Balzacian(x) -> not Automotive(x))\nforall x (Perturbed(x) and Unsworn(x) -> Automotive(x))\nforall x (Automotive(x) and Unsworn(x) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Automotive(x) -> Ferial(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) and Ferial(x) -> Shockable(x))\n\nnot Automotive(ichabod)\n\nforall x (Perturbed(x) and Unsworn(x) -> Automotive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Vincents is not placatory. Vincents is sinitic. Vincents is enceinte. Vincents is chylous. Shannan is nonfat. Shannan is placatory. Shannan is enceinte. Dion is not nonfat. Dion is not sinitic. Dion is enceinte. Dion is chylous. Sammie is placatory. Sammie is not enceinte. Sammie is casebook. Sammie is chylous. If someone is fleecy and casebook then they are sinitic. If someone is chylous and not enceinte then they are sinitic. If someone is placatory and nonfat then they are sinitic. If someone is placatory and not nonfat then they are not casebook. Kind, enceinte people are casebook. All casebook, enceinte people are chylous. All casebook people are chylous. If someone is placatory and chylous then they are fleecy. Vincents is fleecy.", "logic": "\nnot Placatory(vincents)\nSinitic(vincents)\nEnceinte(vincents)\nChylous(vincents)\nNonfat(shannan)\nPlacatory(shannan)\nEnceinte(shannan)\nnot Nonfat(dion)\nnot Sinitic(dion)\nEnceinte(dion)\nChylous(dion)\nPlacatory(sammie)\nnot Enceinte(sammie)\nCasebook(sammie)\nChylous(sammie)\nforall x (Fleecy(x) and Casebook(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) and not Enceinte(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) and Nonfat(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) and not Nonfat(x) -> not Casebook(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) and Enceinte(x) -> Casebook(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) and Enceinte(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Casebook(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) and Chylous(x) -> Fleecy(x))\n\nFleecy(vincents)\n\nforall x (Placatory(x) and Chylous(x) -> Fleecy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Rafa is not commutable. Rafa is gingerly. Rafa is lxxiii. Rafa is formidable. Burgess is bipinnate. Burgess is commutable. Burgess is lxxiii. Lewis is not bipinnate. Lewis is not gingerly. Lewis is lxxiii. Lewis is formidable. Antonino is commutable. Antonino is not lxxiii. Antonino is upper. Antonino is formidable. If someone is horrid and upper then they are gingerly. If someone is formidable and not lxxiii then they are gingerly. If someone is commutable and bipinnate then they are gingerly. If someone is commutable and not bipinnate then they are not upper. Kind, lxxiii people are upper. All upper, lxxiii people are formidable. All upper people are formidable. If someone is commutable and formidable then they are horrid. Lewis is not horrid.", "logic": "\nnot Commutable(rafa)\nGingerly(rafa)\nLxxiii(rafa)\nFormidable(rafa)\nBipinnate(burgess)\nCommutable(burgess)\nLxxiii(burgess)\nnot Bipinnate(lewis)\nnot Gingerly(lewis)\nLxxiii(lewis)\nFormidable(lewis)\nCommutable(antonino)\nnot Lxxiii(antonino)\nUpper(antonino)\nFormidable(antonino)\nforall x (Horrid(x) and Upper(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and not Lxxiii(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nforall x (Commutable(x) and Bipinnate(x) -> Gingerly(x))\nforall x (Commutable(x) and not Bipinnate(x) -> not Upper(x))\nforall x (Gingerly(x) and Lxxiii(x) -> Upper(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) and Lxxiii(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Commutable(x) and Formidable(x) -> Horrid(x))\n\nnot Horrid(lewis)\n\nforall x (Commutable(x) and Formidable(x) -> Horrid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Alecia is not influent. Alecia is sallow. Alecia is congestive. Alecia is continued. Ameline is tortuous. Ameline is influent. Ameline is congestive. Rice is not tortuous. Rice is not sallow. Rice is congestive. Rice is continued. Krishna is influent. Krishna is not congestive. Krishna is synchronal. Krishna is continued. If someone is diestrous and synchronal then they are sallow. If someone is continued and not congestive then they are sallow. If someone is influent and tortuous then they are sallow. If someone is influent and not tortuous then they are not synchronal. Kind, congestive people are synchronal. All synchronal, congestive people are continued. All synchronal people are continued. If someone is influent and continued then they are diestrous. Alecia is tortuous.", "logic": "\nnot Influent(alecia)\nSallow(alecia)\nCongestive(alecia)\nContinued(alecia)\nTortuous(ameline)\nInfluent(ameline)\nCongestive(ameline)\nnot Tortuous(rice)\nnot Sallow(rice)\nCongestive(rice)\nContinued(rice)\nInfluent(krishna)\nnot Congestive(krishna)\nSynchronal(krishna)\nContinued(krishna)\nforall x (Diestrous(x) and Synchronal(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Continued(x) and not Congestive(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Influent(x) and Tortuous(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Influent(x) and not Tortuous(x) -> not Synchronal(x))\nforall x (Sallow(x) and Congestive(x) -> Synchronal(x))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) and Congestive(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Influent(x) and Continued(x) -> Diestrous(x))\n\nTortuous(alecia)\n\nTortuous(alecia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Debbi is not dampish. Debbi is stone. Debbi is unorthodox. Debbi is unpunished. Krista is erstwhile. Krista is dampish. Krista is unorthodox. Betteann is not erstwhile. Betteann is not stone. Betteann is unorthodox. Betteann is unpunished. Elsinore is dampish. Elsinore is not unorthodox. Elsinore is turned. Elsinore is unpunished. If someone is catabatic and turned then they are stone. If someone is unpunished and not unorthodox then they are stone. If someone is dampish and erstwhile then they are stone. If someone is dampish and not erstwhile then they are not turned. Kind, unorthodox people are turned. All turned, unorthodox people are unpunished. All turned people are unpunished. If someone is dampish and unpunished then they are catabatic. Elsinore is not erstwhile.", "logic": "\nnot Dampish(debbi)\nStone(debbi)\nUnorthodox(debbi)\nUnpunished(debbi)\nErstwhile(krista)\nDampish(krista)\nUnorthodox(krista)\nnot Erstwhile(betteann)\nnot Stone(betteann)\nUnorthodox(betteann)\nUnpunished(betteann)\nDampish(elsinore)\nnot Unorthodox(elsinore)\nTurned(elsinore)\nUnpunished(elsinore)\nforall x (Catabatic(x) and Turned(x) -> Stone(x))\nforall x (Unpunished(x) and not Unorthodox(x) -> Stone(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Erstwhile(x) -> Stone(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and not Erstwhile(x) -> not Turned(x))\nforall x (Stone(x) and Unorthodox(x) -> Turned(x))\nforall x (Turned(x) and Unorthodox(x) -> Unpunished(x))\nforall x (Turned(x) -> Unpunished(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Unpunished(x) -> Catabatic(x))\n\nnot Erstwhile(elsinore)\n\nnot Erstwhile(elsinore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Antonia is not voltaic. Antonia is melanesian. Antonia is proclaimed. Antonia is comburant. Skye is valued. Skye is voltaic. Skye is proclaimed. Sherlock is not valued. Sherlock is not melanesian. Sherlock is proclaimed. Sherlock is comburant. Darci is voltaic. Darci is not proclaimed. Darci is manned. Darci is comburant. If someone is pawky and manned then they are melanesian. If someone is comburant and not proclaimed then they are melanesian. If someone is voltaic and valued then they are melanesian. If someone is voltaic and not valued then they are not manned. Kind, proclaimed people are manned. All manned, proclaimed people are comburant. All manned people are comburant. If someone is voltaic and comburant then they are pawky. Sherlock is voltaic.", "logic": "\nnot Voltaic(antonia)\nMelanesian(antonia)\nProclaimed(antonia)\nComburant(antonia)\nValued(skye)\nVoltaic(skye)\nProclaimed(skye)\nnot Valued(sherlock)\nnot Melanesian(sherlock)\nProclaimed(sherlock)\nComburant(sherlock)\nVoltaic(darci)\nnot Proclaimed(darci)\nManned(darci)\nComburant(darci)\nforall x (Pawky(x) and Manned(x) -> Melanesian(x))\nforall x (Comburant(x) and not Proclaimed(x) -> Melanesian(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) and Valued(x) -> Melanesian(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) and not Valued(x) -> not Manned(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) and Proclaimed(x) -> Manned(x))\nforall x (Manned(x) and Proclaimed(x) -> Comburant(x))\nforall x (Manned(x) -> Comburant(x))\nforall x (Voltaic(x) and Comburant(x) -> Pawky(x))\n\nVoltaic(sherlock)\n\nVoltaic(sherlock) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-507"} {"premises": "Lemmie is wizardly. Martina is wizardly. Edita is tuberous. Selestina is pitted. All wizardly things are tuberous. Green, tuberous things are mesial. Cold, able things are crispate. If Martina is corned then Martina is wizardly. Smart things are able. White things are wizardly. If Lemmie is mesial then Lemmie is corned. Furry, able things are pitted. Martina is wizardly.", "logic": "\nWizardly(lemmie)\nWizardly(martina)\nTuberous(edita)\nPitted(selestina)\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Tuberous(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) and Tuberous(x) -> Mesial(x))\nforall x (Mesial(x) and Able(x) -> Crispate(x))\nCorned(martina) -> Wizardly(martina)\nforall x (Corned(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nMesial(lemmie) -> Corned(lemmie)\nforall x (Tuberous(x) and Able(x) -> Pitted(x))\n\nWizardly(martina)\n\ntherefore Wizardly(martina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Cain is unseasoned. Myra is unseasoned. April is innocent. Consolata is adjustable. All unseasoned things are innocent. Green, innocent things are hempen. Cold, multilevel things are unworthy. If Myra is tender then Myra is unseasoned. Smart things are multilevel. White things are unseasoned. If Cain is hempen then Cain is tender. Furry, multilevel things are adjustable. Cain is not unseasoned.", "logic": "\nUnseasoned(cain)\nUnseasoned(myra)\nInnocent(april)\nAdjustable(consolata)\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) -> Innocent(x))\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) and Innocent(x) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) and Multilevel(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nTender(myra) -> Unseasoned(myra)\nforall x (Tender(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Unseasoned(x))\nHempen(cain) -> Tender(cain)\nforall x (Innocent(x) and Multilevel(x) -> Adjustable(x))\n\nnot Unseasoned(cain)\n\ntherefore Unseasoned(cain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Demetrius is wheeled. Fernanda is wheeled. Philipa is categorial. Biddy is redoubled. All wheeled things are categorial. Green, categorial things are friable. Cold, hired things are vertical. If Fernanda is transonic then Fernanda is wheeled. Smart things are hired. White things are wheeled. If Demetrius is friable then Demetrius is transonic. Furry, hired things are redoubled. Fernanda is categorial.", "logic": "\nWheeled(demetrius)\nWheeled(fernanda)\nCategorial(philipa)\nRedoubled(biddy)\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) and Categorial(x) -> Friable(x))\nforall x (Friable(x) and Hired(x) -> Vertical(x))\nTransonic(fernanda) -> Wheeled(fernanda)\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Hired(x))\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nFriable(demetrius) -> Transonic(demetrius)\nforall x (Categorial(x) and Hired(x) -> Redoubled(x))\n\nCategorial(fernanda)\n\nWheeled(fernanda) and forall x (Wheeled(x) -> Categorial(x)) -> therefore Categorial(fernanda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Pepillo is mendacious. Sterling is mendacious. Lonny is bunchy. Ursola is binominal. All mendacious things are bunchy. Green, bunchy things are spacy. Cold, altricial things are middlemost. If Sterling is fashioned then Sterling is mendacious. Smart things are altricial. White things are mendacious. If Pepillo is spacy then Pepillo is fashioned. Furry, altricial things are binominal. Pepillo is not bunchy.", "logic": "\nMendacious(pepillo)\nMendacious(sterling)\nBunchy(lonny)\nBinominal(ursola)\nforall x (Mendacious(x) -> Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Mendacious(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Spacy(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) and Altricial(x) -> Middlemost(x))\nFashioned(sterling) -> Mendacious(sterling)\nforall x (Fashioned(x) -> Altricial(x))\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Mendacious(x))\nSpacy(pepillo) -> Fashioned(pepillo)\nforall x (Bunchy(x) and Altricial(x) -> Binominal(x))\n\nnot Bunchy(pepillo)\n\nMendacious(pepillo) and forall x (Mendacious(x) -> Bunchy(x)) -> therefore Bunchy(pepillo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Aila is baseborn. Spike is baseborn. Anja is steadfast. Dannie is divisive. All baseborn things are steadfast. Green, steadfast things are endowed. Cold, idealistic things are undamaged. If Spike is unposed then Spike is baseborn. Smart things are idealistic. White things are baseborn. If Aila is endowed then Aila is unposed. Furry, idealistic things are divisive. Aila is endowed.", "logic": "\nBaseborn(aila)\nBaseborn(spike)\nSteadfast(anja)\nDivisive(dannie)\nforall x (Baseborn(x) -> Steadfast(x))\nforall x (Baseborn(x) and Steadfast(x) -> Endowed(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) and Idealistic(x) -> Undamaged(x))\nUnposed(spike) -> Baseborn(spike)\nforall x (Unposed(x) -> Idealistic(x))\nforall x (Undamaged(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nEndowed(aila) -> Unposed(aila)\nforall x (Steadfast(x) and Idealistic(x) -> Divisive(x))\n\nEndowed(aila)\n\nBaseborn(aila) and forall x (Baseborn(x) -> Steadfast(x)) -> therefore Steadfast(aila) Baseborn(aila) and Steadfast(aila) and forall x (Baseborn(x) and Steadfast(x) -> Endowed(x)) -> therefore Endowed(aila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Raymund is avestan. Dana is avestan. Regen is pokey. Loni is missional. All avestan things are pokey. Green, pokey things are exegetical. Cold, wesleyan things are austere. If Dana is lobar then Dana is avestan. Smart things are wesleyan. White things are avestan. If Raymund is exegetical then Raymund is lobar. Furry, wesleyan things are missional. Raymund is not exegetical.", "logic": "\nAvestan(raymund)\nAvestan(dana)\nPokey(regen)\nMissional(loni)\nforall x (Avestan(x) -> Pokey(x))\nforall x (Avestan(x) and Pokey(x) -> Exegetical(x))\nforall x (Exegetical(x) and Wesleyan(x) -> Austere(x))\nLobar(dana) -> Avestan(dana)\nforall x (Lobar(x) -> Wesleyan(x))\nforall x (Austere(x) -> Avestan(x))\nExegetical(raymund) -> Lobar(raymund)\nforall x (Pokey(x) and Wesleyan(x) -> Missional(x))\n\nnot Exegetical(raymund)\n\nAvestan(raymund) and forall x (Avestan(x) -> Pokey(x)) -> therefore Pokey(raymund) Avestan(raymund) and Pokey(raymund) and forall x (Avestan(x) and Pokey(x) -> Exegetical(x)) -> therefore Exegetical(raymund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Sterling is unoriginal. Roseann is unoriginal. Jerzy is branchial. Ingemar is disgusted. All unoriginal things are branchial. Green, branchial things are sugary. Cold, linelike things are rousseauan. If Roseann is javanese then Roseann is unoriginal. Smart things are linelike. White things are unoriginal. If Sterling is sugary then Sterling is javanese. Furry, linelike things are disgusted. Sterling is javanese.", "logic": "\nUnoriginal(sterling)\nUnoriginal(roseann)\nBranchial(jerzy)\nDisgusted(ingemar)\nforall x (Unoriginal(x) -> Branchial(x))\nforall x (Unoriginal(x) and Branchial(x) -> Sugary(x))\nforall x (Sugary(x) and Linelike(x) -> Rousseauan(x))\nJavanese(roseann) -> Unoriginal(roseann)\nforall x (Javanese(x) -> Linelike(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nSugary(sterling) -> Javanese(sterling)\nforall x (Branchial(x) and Linelike(x) -> Disgusted(x))\n\nJavanese(sterling)\n\nUnoriginal(sterling) and forall x (Unoriginal(x) -> Branchial(x)) -> therefore Branchial(sterling) Unoriginal(sterling) and Branchial(sterling) and forall x (Unoriginal(x) and Branchial(x) -> Sugary(x)) -> therefore Sugary(sterling) Sugary(sterling) and Sugary(sterling) -> Javanese(sterling) -> therefore Javanese(sterling)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Chaddie is mangey. Kameko is mangey. Erminia is systemic. Steffi is dominical. All mangey things are systemic. Green, systemic things are upraised. Cold, palpebrate things are crispate. If Kameko is dysplastic then Kameko is mangey. Smart things are palpebrate. White things are mangey. If Chaddie is upraised then Chaddie is dysplastic. Furry, palpebrate things are dominical. Chaddie is not dysplastic.", "logic": "\nMangey(chaddie)\nMangey(kameko)\nSystemic(erminia)\nDominical(steffi)\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> Systemic(x))\nforall x (Mangey(x) and Systemic(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Crispate(x))\nDysplastic(kameko) -> Mangey(kameko)\nforall x (Dysplastic(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) -> Mangey(x))\nUpraised(chaddie) -> Dysplastic(chaddie)\nforall x (Systemic(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Dominical(x))\n\nnot Dysplastic(chaddie)\n\nMangey(chaddie) and forall x (Mangey(x) -> Systemic(x)) -> therefore Systemic(chaddie) Mangey(chaddie) and Systemic(chaddie) and forall x (Mangey(x) and Systemic(x) -> Upraised(x)) -> therefore Upraised(chaddie) Upraised(chaddie) and Upraised(chaddie) -> Dysplastic(chaddie) -> therefore Dysplastic(chaddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Noemi is diffident. Erika is diffident. Ellsworth is birken. Aubrie is unbowed. All diffident things are birken. Green, birken things are idealized. Cold, interfaith things are habitable. If Erika is parvenue then Erika is diffident. Smart things are interfaith. White things are diffident. If Noemi is idealized then Noemi is parvenue. Furry, interfaith things are unbowed. Ellsworth is not unbowed.", "logic": "\nDiffident(noemi)\nDiffident(erika)\nBirken(ellsworth)\nUnbowed(aubrie)\nforall x (Diffident(x) -> Birken(x))\nforall x (Diffident(x) and Birken(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Idealized(x) and Interfaith(x) -> Habitable(x))\nParvenue(erika) -> Diffident(erika)\nforall x (Parvenue(x) -> Interfaith(x))\nforall x (Habitable(x) -> Diffident(x))\nIdealized(noemi) -> Parvenue(noemi)\nforall x (Birken(x) and Interfaith(x) -> Unbowed(x))\n\nnot Unbowed(ellsworth)\n\nforall x (Birken(x) and Interfaith(x) -> Unbowed(x)) <- forall x (Parvenue(x) -> Interfaith(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Rosaleen is cycloid. Vicky is cycloid. Lynda is sublimated. Adolpho is flatbottom. All cycloid things are sublimated. Green, sublimated things are pink. Cold, sozzled things are bluish. If Vicky is brindled then Vicky is cycloid. Smart things are sozzled. White things are cycloid. If Rosaleen is pink then Rosaleen is brindled. Furry, sozzled things are flatbottom. Vicky is bluish.", "logic": "\nCycloid(rosaleen)\nCycloid(vicky)\nSublimated(lynda)\nFlatbottom(adolpho)\nforall x (Cycloid(x) -> Sublimated(x))\nforall x (Cycloid(x) and Sublimated(x) -> Pink(x))\nforall x (Pink(x) and Sozzled(x) -> Bluish(x))\nBrindled(vicky) -> Cycloid(vicky)\nforall x (Brindled(x) -> Sozzled(x))\nforall x (Bluish(x) -> Cycloid(x))\nPink(rosaleen) -> Brindled(rosaleen)\nforall x (Sublimated(x) and Sozzled(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\n\nBluish(vicky)\n\nforall x (Pink(x) and Sozzled(x) -> Bluish(x)) <- forall x (Brindled(x) -> Sozzled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Marrissa is continual. Robina is continual. Barby is enlarged. Graehme is julian. All continual things are enlarged. Green, enlarged things are hoarse. Cold, triennial things are variant. If Robina is revertible then Robina is continual. Smart things are triennial. White things are continual. If Marrissa is hoarse then Marrissa is revertible. Furry, triennial things are julian. Graehme is not variant.", "logic": "\nContinual(marrissa)\nContinual(robina)\nEnlarged(barby)\nJulian(graehme)\nforall x (Continual(x) -> Enlarged(x))\nforall x (Continual(x) and Enlarged(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nforall x (Hoarse(x) and Triennial(x) -> Variant(x))\nRevertible(robina) -> Continual(robina)\nforall x (Revertible(x) -> Triennial(x))\nforall x (Variant(x) -> Continual(x))\nHoarse(marrissa) -> Revertible(marrissa)\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and Triennial(x) -> Julian(x))\n\nnot Variant(graehme)\n\nforall x (Hoarse(x) and Triennial(x) -> Variant(x)) <- forall x (Revertible(x) -> Triennial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Gino is metameric. Wyatt is metameric. Giffy is transitory. Talbert is frosted. All metameric things are transitory. Green, transitory things are labelled. Cold, french things are fatalistic. If Wyatt is unsaid then Wyatt is metameric. Smart things are french. White things are metameric. If Gino is labelled then Gino is unsaid. Furry, french things are frosted. Talbert is transitory.", "logic": "\nMetameric(gino)\nMetameric(wyatt)\nTransitory(giffy)\nFrosted(talbert)\nforall x (Metameric(x) -> Transitory(x))\nforall x (Metameric(x) and Transitory(x) -> Labelled(x))\nforall x (Labelled(x) and French(x) -> Fatalistic(x))\nUnsaid(wyatt) -> Metameric(wyatt)\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> French(x))\nforall x (Fatalistic(x) -> Metameric(x))\nLabelled(gino) -> Unsaid(gino)\nforall x (Transitory(x) and French(x) -> Frosted(x))\n\nTransitory(talbert)\n\nforall x (Metameric(x) -> Transitory(x)) <- forall x (Fatalistic(x) -> Metameric(x)) <- forall x (Labelled(x) and French(x) -> Fatalistic(x)) <- forall x (Metameric(x) and Transitory(x) -> Labelled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Tobye is dermic. Bevvy is dermic. Melinde is devilish. Lemar is myopic. All dermic things are devilish. Green, devilish things are beatific. Cold, bedfast things are minded. If Bevvy is binuclear then Bevvy is dermic. Smart things are bedfast. White things are dermic. If Tobye is beatific then Tobye is binuclear. Furry, bedfast things are myopic. Lemar is not binuclear.", "logic": "\nDermic(tobye)\nDermic(bevvy)\nDevilish(melinde)\nMyopic(lemar)\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> Devilish(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) and Devilish(x) -> Beatific(x))\nforall x (Beatific(x) and Bedfast(x) -> Minded(x))\nBinuclear(bevvy) -> Dermic(bevvy)\nforall x (Binuclear(x) -> Bedfast(x))\nforall x (Minded(x) -> Dermic(x))\nBeatific(tobye) -> Binuclear(tobye)\nforall x (Devilish(x) and Bedfast(x) -> Myopic(x))\n\nnot Binuclear(lemar)\n\nnot Binuclear(lemar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Wilburt is donatist. Pammi is donatist. Norma is varicose. Alyce is unaired. All donatist things are varicose. Green, varicose things are holey. Cold, maidenly things are pivotal. If Pammi is disparate then Pammi is donatist. Smart things are maidenly. White things are donatist. If Wilburt is holey then Wilburt is disparate. Furry, maidenly things are unaired. Norma is disparate.", "logic": "\nDonatist(wilburt)\nDonatist(pammi)\nVaricose(norma)\nUnaired(alyce)\nforall x (Donatist(x) -> Varicose(x))\nforall x (Donatist(x) and Varicose(x) -> Holey(x))\nforall x (Holey(x) and Maidenly(x) -> Pivotal(x))\nDisparate(pammi) -> Donatist(pammi)\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Maidenly(x))\nforall x (Pivotal(x) -> Donatist(x))\nHoley(wilburt) -> Disparate(wilburt)\nforall x (Varicose(x) and Maidenly(x) -> Unaired(x))\n\nDisparate(norma)\n\nDisparate(norma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-705"} {"premises": "Jodee is nectarous. Stillman is ascetical. Jacquette is planate. If something is aplacental and capitalist then it is nectarous. If something is ischemic then it is nectarous. Kind things are capitalist. Kind things are planate. Green, nectarous things are planate. If Jacquette is planate then Jacquette is not nectarous. If Jacquette is ascetical and Jacquette is not shiny then Jacquette is planate. Cold things are ischemic. Jodee is nectarous.", "logic": "\nNectarous(jodee)\nAscetical(stillman)\nPlanate(jacquette)\nforall x (Aplacental(x) and Capitalist(x) -> Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) -> Nectarous(x))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Planate(x))\nforall x (Ischemic(x) and Nectarous(x) -> Planate(x))\nPlanate(jacquette) -> not Nectarous(jacquette)\nAscetical(jacquette) and not Shiny(jacquette) -> Planate(jacquette)\nforall x (Ascetical(x) -> Ischemic(x))\n\nNectarous(jodee)\n\ntherefore Nectarous(jodee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Bess is synoptical. Ned is chorionic. Debee is ninepenny. If something is mythologic and tousled then it is synoptical. If something is hispanic then it is synoptical. Kind things are tousled. Kind things are ninepenny. Green, synoptical things are ninepenny. If Debee is ninepenny then Debee is not synoptical. If Debee is chorionic and Debee is not narcotic then Debee is ninepenny. Cold things are hispanic. Ned is not chorionic.", "logic": "\nSynoptical(bess)\nChorionic(ned)\nNinepenny(debee)\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Tousled(x) -> Synoptical(x))\nforall x (Hispanic(x) -> Synoptical(x))\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> Tousled(x))\nforall x (Synoptical(x) -> Ninepenny(x))\nforall x (Hispanic(x) and Synoptical(x) -> Ninepenny(x))\nNinepenny(debee) -> not Synoptical(debee)\nChorionic(debee) and not Narcotic(debee) -> Ninepenny(debee)\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Hispanic(x))\n\nnot Chorionic(ned)\n\ntherefore Chorionic(ned)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Terrence is indiscrete. Lezlie is impartial. Garry is thirteenth. If something is calcuttan and pentagonal then it is indiscrete. If something is somatic then it is indiscrete. Kind things are pentagonal. Kind things are thirteenth. Green, indiscrete things are thirteenth. If Garry is thirteenth then Garry is not indiscrete. If Garry is impartial and Garry is not designing then Garry is thirteenth. Cold things are somatic. Garry is not indiscrete.", "logic": "\nIndiscrete(terrence)\nImpartial(lezlie)\nThirteenth(garry)\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) and Pentagonal(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Somatic(x) and Indiscrete(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nThirteenth(garry) -> not Indiscrete(garry)\nImpartial(garry) and not Designing(garry) -> Thirteenth(garry)\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Somatic(x))\n\nnot Indiscrete(garry)\n\nThirteenth(garry) and Thirteenth(garry) -> not Indiscrete(garry) -> therefore not Indiscrete(garry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Mirelle is unplaced. Andreas is congestive. Sissy is pouched. If something is posthumous and lxxxvii then it is unplaced. If something is northward then it is unplaced. Kind things are lxxxvii. Kind things are pouched. Green, unplaced things are pouched. If Sissy is pouched then Sissy is not unplaced. If Sissy is congestive and Sissy is not humanlike then Sissy is pouched. Cold things are northward. Andreas is not northward.", "logic": "\nUnplaced(mirelle)\nCongestive(andreas)\nPouched(sissy)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) and Lxxxvii(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Northward(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Pouched(x))\nforall x (Northward(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Pouched(x))\nPouched(sissy) -> not Unplaced(sissy)\nCongestive(sissy) and not Humanlike(sissy) -> Pouched(sissy)\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Northward(x))\n\nnot Northward(andreas)\n\nCongestive(andreas) and forall x (Congestive(x) -> Northward(x)) -> therefore Northward(andreas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Ellis is prisonlike. Raynor is austrian. Jayne is woodsy. If something is aggravated and infuriated then it is prisonlike. If something is gleaming then it is prisonlike. Kind things are infuriated. Kind things are woodsy. Green, prisonlike things are woodsy. If Jayne is woodsy then Jayne is not prisonlike. If Jayne is austrian and Jayne is not tiptoe then Jayne is woodsy. Cold things are gleaming. Raynor is prisonlike.", "logic": "\nPrisonlike(ellis)\nAustrian(raynor)\nWoodsy(jayne)\nforall x (Aggravated(x) and Infuriated(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Infuriated(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nforall x (Gleaming(x) and Prisonlike(x) -> Woodsy(x))\nWoodsy(jayne) -> not Prisonlike(jayne)\nAustrian(jayne) and not Tiptoe(jayne) -> Woodsy(jayne)\nforall x (Austrian(x) -> Gleaming(x))\n\nPrisonlike(raynor)\n\nAustrian(raynor) and forall x (Austrian(x) -> Gleaming(x)) -> therefore Gleaming(raynor) Gleaming(raynor) and forall x (Gleaming(x) -> Prisonlike(x)) -> therefore Prisonlike(raynor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Lorraine is uricosuric. Jens is shakedown. Mira is chylific. If something is biased and tribal then it is uricosuric. If something is extreme then it is uricosuric. Kind things are tribal. Kind things are chylific. Green, uricosuric things are chylific. If Mira is chylific then Mira is not uricosuric. If Mira is shakedown and Mira is not parttime then Mira is chylific. Cold things are extreme. Jens is not uricosuric.", "logic": "\nUricosuric(lorraine)\nShakedown(jens)\nChylific(mira)\nforall x (Biased(x) and Tribal(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\nforall x (Extreme(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Tribal(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) -> Chylific(x))\nforall x (Extreme(x) and Uricosuric(x) -> Chylific(x))\nChylific(mira) -> not Uricosuric(mira)\nShakedown(mira) and not Parttime(mira) -> Chylific(mira)\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Extreme(x))\n\nnot Uricosuric(jens)\n\nShakedown(jens) and forall x (Shakedown(x) -> Extreme(x)) -> therefore Extreme(jens) Extreme(jens) and forall x (Extreme(x) -> Uricosuric(x)) -> therefore Uricosuric(jens)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Jenifer is appetitive. Cherey is peaty. Rochelle is grownup. If something is protecting and anurous then it is appetitive. If something is acetose then it is appetitive. Kind things are anurous. Kind things are grownup. Green, appetitive things are grownup. If Rochelle is grownup then Rochelle is not appetitive. If Rochelle is peaty and Rochelle is not pomaded then Rochelle is grownup. Cold things are acetose. Cherey is anurous.", "logic": "\nAppetitive(jenifer)\nPeaty(cherey)\nGrownup(rochelle)\nforall x (Protecting(x) and Anurous(x) -> Appetitive(x))\nforall x (Acetose(x) -> Appetitive(x))\nforall x (Appetitive(x) -> Anurous(x))\nforall x (Appetitive(x) -> Grownup(x))\nforall x (Acetose(x) and Appetitive(x) -> Grownup(x))\nGrownup(rochelle) -> not Appetitive(rochelle)\nPeaty(rochelle) and not Pomaded(rochelle) -> Grownup(rochelle)\nforall x (Peaty(x) -> Acetose(x))\n\nAnurous(cherey)\n\nPeaty(cherey) and forall x (Peaty(x) -> Acetose(x)) -> therefore Acetose(cherey) Acetose(cherey) and forall x (Acetose(x) -> Appetitive(x)) -> therefore Appetitive(cherey) Appetitive(cherey) and forall x (Appetitive(x) -> Anurous(x)) -> therefore Anurous(cherey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Matilde is unseasoned. Lonna is unbarreled. Katey is westerly. If something is unironed and slavelike then it is unseasoned. If something is trabeate then it is unseasoned. Kind things are slavelike. Kind things are westerly. Green, unseasoned things are westerly. If Katey is westerly then Katey is not unseasoned. If Katey is unbarreled and Katey is not actuarial then Katey is westerly. Cold things are trabeate. Lonna is not westerly.", "logic": "\nUnseasoned(matilde)\nUnbarreled(lonna)\nWesterly(katey)\nforall x (Unironed(x) and Slavelike(x) -> Unseasoned(x))\nforall x (Trabeate(x) -> Unseasoned(x))\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) -> Slavelike(x))\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) -> Westerly(x))\nforall x (Trabeate(x) and Unseasoned(x) -> Westerly(x))\nWesterly(katey) -> not Unseasoned(katey)\nUnbarreled(katey) and not Actuarial(katey) -> Westerly(katey)\nforall x (Unbarreled(x) -> Trabeate(x))\n\nnot Westerly(lonna)\n\nUnbarreled(lonna) and forall x (Unbarreled(x) -> Trabeate(x)) -> therefore Trabeate(lonna) Trabeate(lonna) and forall x (Trabeate(x) -> Unseasoned(x)) -> therefore Unseasoned(lonna) Unseasoned(lonna) and forall x (Unseasoned(x) -> Westerly(x)) -> therefore Westerly(lonna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Jeffery is desirous. Amery is camp. Otis is awless. If something is bauxitic and favorite then it is desirous. If something is messy then it is desirous. Kind things are favorite. Kind things are awless. Green, desirous things are awless. If Otis is awless then Otis is not desirous. If Otis is camp and Otis is not utter then Otis is awless. Cold things are messy. Otis is not favorite.", "logic": "\nDesirous(jeffery)\nCamp(amery)\nAwless(otis)\nforall x (Bauxitic(x) and Favorite(x) -> Desirous(x))\nforall x (Messy(x) -> Desirous(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) -> Awless(x))\nforall x (Messy(x) and Desirous(x) -> Awless(x))\nAwless(otis) -> not Desirous(otis)\nCamp(otis) and not Utter(otis) -> Awless(otis)\nforall x (Camp(x) -> Messy(x))\n\nnot Favorite(otis)\n\nforall x (Desirous(x) -> Favorite(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Ainslie is sulky. Geneva is semidark. Armando is undrained. If something is roumanian and volute then it is sulky. If something is kept then it is sulky. Kind things are volute. Kind things are undrained. Green, sulky things are undrained. If Armando is undrained then Armando is not sulky. If Armando is semidark and Armando is not postural then Armando is undrained. Cold things are kept. Ainslie is kept.", "logic": "\nSulky(ainslie)\nSemidark(geneva)\nUndrained(armando)\nforall x (Roumanian(x) and Volute(x) -> Sulky(x))\nforall x (Kept(x) -> Sulky(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Volute(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Undrained(x))\nforall x (Kept(x) and Sulky(x) -> Undrained(x))\nUndrained(armando) -> not Sulky(armando)\nSemidark(armando) and not Postural(armando) -> Undrained(armando)\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Kept(x))\n\nKept(ainslie)\n\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Kept(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Magna is resolute. Shep is juridical. Cicely is boneheaded. If something is shrubby and sardinian then it is resolute. If something is twinkly then it is resolute. Kind things are sardinian. Kind things are boneheaded. Green, resolute things are boneheaded. If Cicely is boneheaded then Cicely is not resolute. If Cicely is juridical and Cicely is not unsexed then Cicely is boneheaded. Cold things are twinkly. Cicely is not twinkly.", "logic": "\nResolute(magna)\nJuridical(shep)\nBoneheaded(cicely)\nforall x (Shrubby(x) and Sardinian(x) -> Resolute(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) -> Resolute(x))\nforall x (Resolute(x) -> Sardinian(x))\nforall x (Resolute(x) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Twinkly(x) and Resolute(x) -> Boneheaded(x))\nBoneheaded(cicely) -> not Resolute(cicely)\nJuridical(cicely) and not Unsexed(cicely) -> Boneheaded(cicely)\nforall x (Juridical(x) -> Twinkly(x))\n\nnot Twinkly(cicely)\n\nforall x (Juridical(x) -> Twinkly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Titos is analeptic. Miranda is hypnotic. Brena is invertible. If something is glabellar and hastate then it is analeptic. If something is junior then it is analeptic. Kind things are hastate. Kind things are invertible. Green, analeptic things are invertible. If Brena is invertible then Brena is not analeptic. If Brena is hypnotic and Brena is not undersize then Brena is invertible. Cold things are junior. Brena is undersize.", "logic": "\nAnaleptic(titos)\nHypnotic(miranda)\nInvertible(brena)\nforall x (Glabellar(x) and Hastate(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) -> Analeptic(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Hastate(x))\nforall x (Analeptic(x) -> Invertible(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) and Analeptic(x) -> Invertible(x))\nInvertible(brena) -> not Analeptic(brena)\nHypnotic(brena) and not Undersize(brena) -> Invertible(brena)\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Junior(x))\n\nUndersize(brena)\n\nUndersize(brena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Alanah is informal. Alyda is grand. Paolo is stilted. If something is unmerited and somalian then it is informal. If something is unbiased then it is informal. Kind things are somalian. Kind things are stilted. Green, informal things are stilted. If Paolo is stilted then Paolo is not informal. If Paolo is grand and Paolo is not burdensome then Paolo is stilted. Cold things are unbiased. Alanah is not grand.", "logic": "\nInformal(alanah)\nGrand(alyda)\nStilted(paolo)\nforall x (Unmerited(x) and Somalian(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Informal(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Somalian(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Stilted(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Informal(x) -> Stilted(x))\nStilted(paolo) -> not Informal(paolo)\nGrand(paolo) and not Burdensome(paolo) -> Stilted(paolo)\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Unbiased(x))\n\nnot Grand(alanah)\n\nnot Grand(alanah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Lauree is synergetic. Easter is fuzzed. Stafford is premarital. If something is kingly and cuboidal then it is synergetic. If something is omnivorous then it is synergetic. Kind things are cuboidal. Kind things are premarital. Green, synergetic things are premarital. If Stafford is premarital then Stafford is not synergetic. If Stafford is fuzzed and Stafford is not jovial then Stafford is premarital. Cold things are omnivorous. Lauree is kingly.", "logic": "\nSynergetic(lauree)\nFuzzed(easter)\nPremarital(stafford)\nforall x (Kingly(x) and Cuboidal(x) -> Synergetic(x))\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) -> Synergetic(x))\nforall x (Synergetic(x) -> Cuboidal(x))\nforall x (Synergetic(x) -> Premarital(x))\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) and Synergetic(x) -> Premarital(x))\nPremarital(stafford) -> not Synergetic(stafford)\nFuzzed(stafford) and not Jovial(stafford) -> Premarital(stafford)\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) -> Omnivorous(x))\n\nKingly(lauree)\n\nKingly(lauree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Rustie is unaged. Penelopa is medium. Lay is tuneless. If something is cosmogonic and carbonylic then it is unaged. If something is jerky then it is unaged. Kind things are carbonylic. Kind things are tuneless. Green, unaged things are tuneless. If Lay is tuneless then Lay is not unaged. If Lay is medium and Lay is not solved then Lay is tuneless. Cold things are jerky. Rustie is not solved.", "logic": "\nUnaged(rustie)\nMedium(penelopa)\nTuneless(lay)\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) and Carbonylic(x) -> Unaged(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) -> Unaged(x))\nforall x (Unaged(x) -> Carbonylic(x))\nforall x (Unaged(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) and Unaged(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nTuneless(lay) -> not Unaged(lay)\nMedium(lay) and not Solved(lay) -> Tuneless(lay)\nforall x (Medium(x) -> Jerky(x))\n\nnot Solved(rustie)\n\nnot Solved(rustie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Bonnie is bodacious. Meyer is correct. Prisca is ethical. If something is katari and nutty then it is bodacious. If something is bonkers then it is bodacious. Kind things are nutty. Kind things are ethical. Green, bodacious things are ethical. If Prisca is ethical then Prisca is not bodacious. If Prisca is correct and Prisca is not indicative then Prisca is ethical. Cold things are bonkers. Prisca is katari.", "logic": "\nBodacious(bonnie)\nCorrect(meyer)\nEthical(prisca)\nforall x (Katari(x) and Nutty(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Nutty(x))\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Ethical(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) and Bodacious(x) -> Ethical(x))\nEthical(prisca) -> not Bodacious(prisca)\nCorrect(prisca) and not Indicative(prisca) -> Ethical(prisca)\nforall x (Correct(x) -> Bonkers(x))\n\nKatari(prisca)\n\nKatari(prisca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1420"} {"premises": "Gaby is upmost. Gaby is scrupulous. Pammie is engraved. Pammie is prepupal. Cookie is ungainly. Cookie is secluded. Arabela is ungainly. If something is ungainly then it is honeyed. Smart things are prepupal. If something is upmost and ungainly then it is engraved. Smart things are ungainly. Red things are scrupulous. If something is scrupulous and prepupal then it is honeyed. All scrupulous, engraved things are prepupal. If something is ungainly then it is honeyed. Pammie is prepupal.", "logic": "\nUpmost(gaby)\nScrupulous(gaby)\nEngraved(pammie)\nPrepupal(pammie)\nUngainly(cookie)\nSecluded(cookie)\nUngainly(arabela)\nforall x (Ungainly(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) -> Prepupal(x))\nforall x (Upmost(x) and Ungainly(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) -> Ungainly(x))\nforall x (Prepupal(x) -> Scrupulous(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Prepupal(x) -> Honeyed(x))\nforall x (Scrupulous(x) and Engraved(x) -> Prepupal(x))\nforall x (Ungainly(x) -> Honeyed(x))\n\nPrepupal(pammie)\n\ntherefore Prepupal(pammie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Alister is chestnut. Alister is endangered. Elyse is unstained. Elyse is linnean. Yelena is fruity. Yelena is unsounded. Wittie is fruity. If something is fruity then it is doleful. Smart things are linnean. If something is chestnut and fruity then it is unstained. Smart things are fruity. Red things are endangered. If something is endangered and linnean then it is doleful. All endangered, unstained things are linnean. If something is fruity then it is doleful. Alister is not endangered.", "logic": "\nChestnut(alister)\nEndangered(alister)\nUnstained(elyse)\nLinnean(elyse)\nFruity(yelena)\nUnsounded(yelena)\nFruity(wittie)\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Linnean(x))\nforall x (Chestnut(x) and Fruity(x) -> Unstained(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Fruity(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) -> Endangered(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) and Linnean(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) and Unstained(x) -> Linnean(x))\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> Doleful(x))\n\nnot Endangered(alister)\n\ntherefore Endangered(alister)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Mariam is alike. Mariam is constant. Emmalee is prescient. Emmalee is brumal. Donald is sunken. Donald is faecal. Reagan is sunken. If something is sunken then it is bespoken. Smart things are brumal. If something is alike and sunken then it is prescient. Smart things are sunken. Red things are constant. If something is constant and brumal then it is bespoken. All constant, prescient things are brumal. If something is sunken then it is bespoken. Donald is bespoken.", "logic": "\nAlike(mariam)\nConstant(mariam)\nPrescient(emmalee)\nBrumal(emmalee)\nSunken(donald)\nFaecal(donald)\nSunken(reagan)\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Brumal(x))\nforall x (Alike(x) and Sunken(x) -> Prescient(x))\nforall x (Bespoken(x) -> Sunken(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) and Brumal(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) and Prescient(x) -> Brumal(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> Bespoken(x))\n\nBespoken(donald)\n\nSunken(donald) and forall x (Sunken(x) -> Bespoken(x)) -> therefore Bespoken(donald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Harrison is handmade. Harrison is astatic. Webb is stainless. Webb is unexcited. Una is apocrine. Una is quartzose. Stacee is apocrine. If something is apocrine then it is branded. Smart things are unexcited. If something is handmade and apocrine then it is stainless. Smart things are apocrine. Red things are astatic. If something is astatic and unexcited then it is branded. All astatic, stainless things are unexcited. If something is apocrine then it is branded. Stacee is not branded.", "logic": "\nHandmade(harrison)\nAstatic(harrison)\nStainless(webb)\nUnexcited(webb)\nApocrine(una)\nQuartzose(una)\nApocrine(stacee)\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> Branded(x))\nforall x (Branded(x) -> Unexcited(x))\nforall x (Handmade(x) and Apocrine(x) -> Stainless(x))\nforall x (Branded(x) -> Apocrine(x))\nforall x (Unexcited(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Unexcited(x) -> Branded(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Stainless(x) -> Unexcited(x))\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> Branded(x))\n\nnot Branded(stacee)\n\nApocrine(stacee) and forall x (Apocrine(x) -> Branded(x)) -> therefore Branded(stacee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Morrie is gooey. Morrie is vocalic. Roxy is caddish. Roxy is benzenoid. Sisely is overpriced. Sisely is federated. Teddie is overpriced. If something is overpriced then it is focal. Smart things are benzenoid. If something is gooey and overpriced then it is caddish. Smart things are overpriced. Red things are vocalic. If something is vocalic and benzenoid then it is focal. All vocalic, caddish things are benzenoid. If something is overpriced then it is focal. Sisely is benzenoid.", "logic": "\nGooey(morrie)\nVocalic(morrie)\nCaddish(roxy)\nBenzenoid(roxy)\nOverpriced(sisely)\nFederated(sisely)\nOverpriced(teddie)\nforall x (Overpriced(x) -> Focal(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Gooey(x) and Overpriced(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Overpriced(x))\nforall x (Benzenoid(x) -> Vocalic(x))\nforall x (Vocalic(x) and Benzenoid(x) -> Focal(x))\nforall x (Vocalic(x) and Caddish(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Overpriced(x) -> Focal(x))\n\nBenzenoid(sisely)\n\nOverpriced(sisely) and forall x (Overpriced(x) -> Focal(x)) -> therefore Focal(sisely) Focal(sisely) and forall x (Focal(x) -> Benzenoid(x)) -> therefore Benzenoid(sisely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Partha is alluvial. Partha is exultant. Jeffry is swarthy. Jeffry is hearing. Almeta is uncarved. Almeta is myeloid. Channa is uncarved. If something is uncarved then it is displeased. Smart things are hearing. If something is alluvial and uncarved then it is swarthy. Smart things are uncarved. Red things are exultant. If something is exultant and hearing then it is displeased. All exultant, swarthy things are hearing. If something is uncarved then it is displeased. Jeffry is not displeased.", "logic": "\nAlluvial(partha)\nExultant(partha)\nSwarthy(jeffry)\nHearing(jeffry)\nUncarved(almeta)\nMyeloid(almeta)\nUncarved(channa)\nforall x (Uncarved(x) -> Displeased(x))\nforall x (Displeased(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) and Uncarved(x) -> Swarthy(x))\nforall x (Displeased(x) -> Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) -> Exultant(x))\nforall x (Exultant(x) and Hearing(x) -> Displeased(x))\nforall x (Exultant(x) and Swarthy(x) -> Hearing(x))\nforall x (Uncarved(x) -> Displeased(x))\n\nnot Displeased(jeffry)\n\nHearing(jeffry) and forall x (Hearing(x) -> Exultant(x)) -> therefore Exultant(jeffry) Exultant(jeffry) and Hearing(jeffry) and forall x (Exultant(x) and Hearing(x) -> Displeased(x)) -> therefore Displeased(jeffry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Todd is turbid. Todd is indiscrete. Hill is flattened. Hill is indecorous. Eleanora is advised. Eleanora is destined. Westley is advised. If something is advised then it is scripted. Smart things are indecorous. If something is turbid and advised then it is flattened. Smart things are advised. Red things are indiscrete. If something is indiscrete and indecorous then it is scripted. All indiscrete, flattened things are indecorous. If something is advised then it is scripted. Westley is indiscrete.", "logic": "\nTurbid(todd)\nIndiscrete(todd)\nFlattened(hill)\nIndecorous(hill)\nAdvised(eleanora)\nDestined(eleanora)\nAdvised(westley)\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Scripted(x))\nforall x (Scripted(x) -> Indecorous(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) and Advised(x) -> Flattened(x))\nforall x (Scripted(x) -> Advised(x))\nforall x (Indecorous(x) -> Indiscrete(x))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) and Indecorous(x) -> Scripted(x))\nforall x (Indiscrete(x) and Flattened(x) -> Indecorous(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) -> Scripted(x))\n\nIndiscrete(westley)\n\nAdvised(westley) and forall x (Advised(x) -> Scripted(x)) -> therefore Scripted(westley) Scripted(westley) and forall x (Scripted(x) -> Indecorous(x)) -> therefore Indecorous(westley) Indecorous(westley) and forall x (Indecorous(x) -> Indiscrete(x)) -> therefore Indiscrete(westley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Kyla is dolabrate. Kyla is runny. Derrick is weekly. Derrick is staid. Aubrie is humorless. Aubrie is untreated. Shawna is humorless. If something is humorless then it is tributary. Smart things are staid. If something is dolabrate and humorless then it is weekly. Smart things are humorless. Red things are runny. If something is runny and staid then it is tributary. All runny, weekly things are staid. If something is humorless then it is tributary. Derrick is not humorless.", "logic": "\nDolabrate(kyla)\nRunny(kyla)\nWeekly(derrick)\nStaid(derrick)\nHumorless(aubrie)\nUntreated(aubrie)\nHumorless(shawna)\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Tributary(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) and Humorless(x) -> Weekly(x))\nforall x (Tributary(x) -> Humorless(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Runny(x) and Staid(x) -> Tributary(x))\nforall x (Runny(x) and Weekly(x) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Tributary(x))\n\nnot Humorless(derrick)\n\nStaid(derrick) and forall x (Staid(x) -> Runny(x)) -> therefore Runny(derrick) Runny(derrick) and Staid(derrick) and forall x (Runny(x) and Staid(x) -> Tributary(x)) -> therefore Tributary(derrick) Tributary(derrick) and forall x (Tributary(x) -> Humorless(x)) -> therefore Humorless(derrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Vance is sharpened. Vance is advised. Jillie is achromatic. Jillie is creditable. Kendra is unworthy. Kendra is fragrant. Jacinta is unworthy. If something is unworthy then it is ladened. Smart things are creditable. If something is sharpened and unworthy then it is achromatic. Smart things are unworthy. Red things are advised. If something is advised and creditable then it is ladened. All advised, achromatic things are creditable. If something is unworthy then it is ladened. Kendra is not achromatic.", "logic": "\nSharpened(vance)\nAdvised(vance)\nAchromatic(jillie)\nCreditable(jillie)\nUnworthy(kendra)\nFragrant(kendra)\nUnworthy(jacinta)\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Ladened(x))\nforall x (Ladened(x) -> Creditable(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nforall x (Ladened(x) -> Unworthy(x))\nforall x (Creditable(x) -> Advised(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) and Creditable(x) -> Ladened(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Creditable(x))\nforall x (Unworthy(x) -> Ladened(x))\n\nnot Achromatic(kendra)\n\nforall x (Sharpened(x) and Unworthy(x) -> Achromatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Nelsen is rattling. Nelsen is steaming. Shandy is dated. Shandy is formic. Angelo is headlong. Angelo is disastrous. Gerold is headlong. If something is headlong then it is purebred. Smart things are formic. If something is rattling and headlong then it is dated. Smart things are headlong. Red things are steaming. If something is steaming and formic then it is purebred. All steaming, dated things are formic. If something is headlong then it is purebred. Nelsen is purebred.", "logic": "\nRattling(nelsen)\nSteaming(nelsen)\nDated(shandy)\nFormic(shandy)\nHeadlong(angelo)\nDisastrous(angelo)\nHeadlong(gerold)\nforall x (Headlong(x) -> Purebred(x))\nforall x (Purebred(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Rattling(x) and Headlong(x) -> Dated(x))\nforall x (Purebred(x) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Formic(x) -> Steaming(x))\nforall x (Steaming(x) and Formic(x) -> Purebred(x))\nforall x (Steaming(x) and Dated(x) -> Formic(x))\nforall x (Headlong(x) -> Purebred(x))\n\nPurebred(nelsen)\n\nforall x (Headlong(x) -> Purebred(x)) <- forall x (Purebred(x) -> Headlong(x)) <- forall x (Steaming(x) and Formic(x) -> Purebred(x)) <- forall x (Purebred(x) -> Formic(x)) <- forall x (Headlong(x) -> Purebred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 5, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Brittany is nonchalant. Brittany is vivacious. Jilli is indurate. Jilli is crustlike. Gus is deviant. Gus is nifty. Brittney is deviant. If something is deviant then it is strapping. Smart things are crustlike. If something is nonchalant and deviant then it is indurate. Smart things are deviant. Red things are vivacious. If something is vivacious and crustlike then it is strapping. All vivacious, indurate things are crustlike. If something is deviant then it is strapping. Brittney is not indurate.", "logic": "\nNonchalant(brittany)\nVivacious(brittany)\nIndurate(jilli)\nCrustlike(jilli)\nDeviant(gus)\nNifty(gus)\nDeviant(brittney)\nforall x (Deviant(x) -> Strapping(x))\nforall x (Strapping(x) -> Crustlike(x))\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) and Deviant(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Strapping(x) -> Deviant(x))\nforall x (Crustlike(x) -> Vivacious(x))\nforall x (Vivacious(x) and Crustlike(x) -> Strapping(x))\nforall x (Vivacious(x) and Indurate(x) -> Crustlike(x))\nforall x (Deviant(x) -> Strapping(x))\n\nnot Indurate(brittney)\n\nforall x (Nonchalant(x) and Deviant(x) -> Indurate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Desaree is oxidized. Desaree is sweet. Janice is loosened. Janice is limited. Renie is epic. Renie is passionate. Zalman is epic. If something is epic then it is evoked. Smart things are limited. If something is oxidized and epic then it is loosened. Smart things are epic. Red things are sweet. If something is sweet and limited then it is evoked. All sweet, loosened things are limited. If something is epic then it is evoked. Desaree is epic.", "logic": "\nOxidized(desaree)\nSweet(desaree)\nLoosened(janice)\nLimited(janice)\nEpic(renie)\nPassionate(renie)\nEpic(zalman)\nforall x (Epic(x) -> Evoked(x))\nforall x (Evoked(x) -> Limited(x))\nforall x (Oxidized(x) and Epic(x) -> Loosened(x))\nforall x (Evoked(x) -> Epic(x))\nforall x (Limited(x) -> Sweet(x))\nforall x (Sweet(x) and Limited(x) -> Evoked(x))\nforall x (Sweet(x) and Loosened(x) -> Limited(x))\nforall x (Epic(x) -> Evoked(x))\n\nEpic(desaree)\n\nforall x (Evoked(x) -> Epic(x)) <- forall x (Sweet(x) and Limited(x) -> Evoked(x)) <- forall x (Evoked(x) -> Limited(x)) <- forall x (Epic(x) -> Evoked(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Conni is bony. Conni is convincing. Kimberly is economic. Kimberly is chopped. Hadleigh is meandering. Hadleigh is crenulated. Mildred is meandering. If something is meandering then it is amazing. Smart things are chopped. If something is bony and meandering then it is economic. Smart things are meandering. Red things are convincing. If something is convincing and chopped then it is amazing. All convincing, economic things are chopped. If something is meandering then it is amazing. Mildred is not bony.", "logic": "\nBony(conni)\nConvincing(conni)\nEconomic(kimberly)\nChopped(kimberly)\nMeandering(hadleigh)\nCrenulated(hadleigh)\nMeandering(mildred)\nforall x (Meandering(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Amazing(x) -> Chopped(x))\nforall x (Bony(x) and Meandering(x) -> Economic(x))\nforall x (Amazing(x) -> Meandering(x))\nforall x (Chopped(x) -> Convincing(x))\nforall x (Convincing(x) and Chopped(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Convincing(x) and Economic(x) -> Chopped(x))\nforall x (Meandering(x) -> Amazing(x))\n\nnot Bony(mildred)\n\nnot Bony(mildred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Jerry is haptic. Jerry is modernised. Timothee is russet. Timothee is gelid. Vincents is bilinear. Vincents is tinkly. Rosita is bilinear. If something is bilinear then it is outsize. Smart things are gelid. If something is haptic and bilinear then it is russet. Smart things are bilinear. Red things are modernised. If something is modernised and gelid then it is outsize. All modernised, russet things are gelid. If something is bilinear then it is outsize. Jerry is tinkly.", "logic": "\nHaptic(jerry)\nModernised(jerry)\nRusset(timothee)\nGelid(timothee)\nBilinear(vincents)\nTinkly(vincents)\nBilinear(rosita)\nforall x (Bilinear(x) -> Outsize(x))\nforall x (Outsize(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Haptic(x) and Bilinear(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Outsize(x) -> Bilinear(x))\nforall x (Gelid(x) -> Modernised(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) and Gelid(x) -> Outsize(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) and Russet(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Bilinear(x) -> Outsize(x))\n\nTinkly(jerry)\n\nTinkly(jerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Averill is peaked. Averill is euphonous. Danella is hortative. Danella is blockaded. Joanie is apterous. Joanie is boggy. Fidela is apterous. If something is apterous then it is definite. Smart things are blockaded. If something is peaked and apterous then it is hortative. Smart things are apterous. Red things are euphonous. If something is euphonous and blockaded then it is definite. All euphonous, hortative things are blockaded. If something is apterous then it is definite. Joanie is not peaked.", "logic": "\nPeaked(averill)\nEuphonous(averill)\nHortative(danella)\nBlockaded(danella)\nApterous(joanie)\nBoggy(joanie)\nApterous(fidela)\nforall x (Apterous(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) -> Blockaded(x))\nforall x (Peaked(x) and Apterous(x) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Definite(x) -> Apterous(x))\nforall x (Blockaded(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and Blockaded(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and Hortative(x) -> Blockaded(x))\nforall x (Apterous(x) -> Definite(x))\n\nnot Peaked(joanie)\n\nnot Peaked(joanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "Burt is xlii. Burt is couth. Kristos is unexplored. Kristos is smelly. Terese is antitypic. Terese is exculpated. Madeline is antitypic. If something is antitypic then it is superlunar. Smart things are smelly. If something is xlii and antitypic then it is unexplored. Smart things are antitypic. Red things are couth. If something is couth and smelly then it is superlunar. All couth, unexplored things are smelly. If something is antitypic then it is superlunar. Kristos is exculpated.", "logic": "\nXlii(burt)\nCouth(burt)\nUnexplored(kristos)\nSmelly(kristos)\nAntitypic(terese)\nExculpated(terese)\nAntitypic(madeline)\nforall x (Antitypic(x) -> Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) and Antitypic(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Antitypic(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Couth(x))\nforall x (Couth(x) and Smelly(x) -> Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Couth(x) and Unexplored(x) -> Smelly(x))\nforall x (Antitypic(x) -> Superlunar(x))\n\nExculpated(kristos)\n\nExculpated(kristos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-871"} {"premises": "The cherish does not see the bradley. The estell trigger the cherish. The estell trigger the bradley. The estell is sloping. The estell dramatize the cherish. The estell does not see the easton. The bradley dramatize the easton. The bradley cultivate the easton. The easton does not chase the bradley. The easton is sloping. The easton is not perineal. The easton dramatize the bradley. If the estell dramatize the cherish and the cherish dramatize the estell then the cherish is not sloping. If the cherish cultivate the bradley then the cherish cultivate the easton. If something is thrifty and it cultivate the cherish then the cherish does not visit the easton. If the cherish does not see the bradley then the cherish cultivate the bradley. If something is starting and it trigger the easton then it does not chase the cherish. If something cultivate the easton then the easton cultivate the estell. If the estell is anodal and the estell is not sloping then the estell dramatize the easton. If something cultivate the easton and the easton cultivate the estell then it dramatize the cherish. The easton dramatize the bradley.", "logic": "\nnot Dramatize(cherish, bradley)\nTrigger(estell, cherish)\nTrigger(estell, bradley)\nSloping(estell)\nDramatize(estell, cherish)\nnot Dramatize(estell, easton)\nDramatize(bradley, easton)\nCultivate(bradley, easton)\nnot Trigger(easton, bradley)\nSloping(easton)\nnot Perineal(easton)\nDramatize(easton, bradley)\nDramatize(estell, cherish) and Dramatize(cherish, estell) -> not Sloping(cherish)\nCultivate(cherish, bradley) -> Cultivate(cherish, easton)\nforall x (Thrifty(x) and Cultivate(x, cherish) -> not Cultivate(cherish, easton))\nnot Dramatize(cherish, bradley) -> Cultivate(cherish, bradley)\nforall x (Starting(x) and Trigger(x, easton) -> not Trigger(x, cherish))\nforall x (Cultivate(x, easton) -> Cultivate(easton, estell))\nAnodal(estell) and not Sloping(estell) -> Dramatize(estell, easton)\nforall x (Cultivate(x, easton) and Cultivate(easton, estell) -> Dramatize(x, cherish))\n\nDramatize(easton, bradley)\n\ntherefore Dramatize(easton, bradley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The marjorie does not see the dea. The mella veneer the marjorie. The mella veneer the dea. The mella is awheel. The mella purple the marjorie. The mella does not see the ivett. The dea purple the ivett. The dea ride the ivett. The ivett does not chase the dea. The ivett is awheel. The ivett is not hermetic. The ivett purple the dea. If the mella purple the marjorie and the marjorie purple the mella then the marjorie is not awheel. If the marjorie ride the dea then the marjorie ride the ivett. If something is teasing and it ride the marjorie then the marjorie does not visit the ivett. If the marjorie does not see the dea then the marjorie ride the dea. If something is tongan and it veneer the ivett then it does not chase the marjorie. If something ride the ivett then the ivett ride the mella. If the mella is miniature and the mella is not awheel then the mella purple the ivett. If something ride the ivett and the ivett ride the mella then it purple the marjorie. The mella does not see the marjorie.", "logic": "\nnot Purple(marjorie, dea)\nVeneer(mella, marjorie)\nVeneer(mella, dea)\nAwheel(mella)\nPurple(mella, marjorie)\nnot Purple(mella, ivett)\nPurple(dea, ivett)\nRide(dea, ivett)\nnot Veneer(ivett, dea)\nAwheel(ivett)\nnot Hermetic(ivett)\nPurple(ivett, dea)\nPurple(mella, marjorie) and Purple(marjorie, mella) -> not Awheel(marjorie)\nRide(marjorie, dea) -> Ride(marjorie, ivett)\nforall x (Teasing(x) and Ride(x, marjorie) -> not Ride(marjorie, ivett))\nnot Purple(marjorie, dea) -> Ride(marjorie, dea)\nforall x (Tongan(x) and Veneer(x, ivett) -> not Veneer(x, marjorie))\nforall x (Ride(x, ivett) -> Ride(ivett, mella))\nMiniature(mella) and not Awheel(mella) -> Purple(mella, ivett)\nforall x (Ride(x, ivett) and Ride(ivett, mella) -> Purple(x, marjorie))\n\nnot Purple(mella, marjorie)\n\ntherefore Purple(mella, marjorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The rubin does not see the guy. The evita barbecue the rubin. The evita barbecue the guy. The evita is myelinic. The evita suction the rubin. The evita does not see the hally. The guy suction the hally. The guy detick the hally. The hally does not chase the guy. The hally is myelinic. The hally is not diatonic. The hally suction the guy. If the evita suction the rubin and the rubin suction the evita then the rubin is not myelinic. If the rubin detick the guy then the rubin detick the hally. If something is tenfold and it detick the rubin then the rubin does not visit the hally. If the rubin does not see the guy then the rubin detick the guy. If something is cosmic and it barbecue the hally then it does not chase the rubin. If something detick the hally then the hally detick the evita. If the evita is unrequited and the evita is not myelinic then the evita suction the hally. If something detick the hally and the hally detick the evita then it suction the rubin. The hally detick the evita.", "logic": "\nnot Suction(rubin, guy)\nBarbecue(evita, rubin)\nBarbecue(evita, guy)\nMyelinic(evita)\nSuction(evita, rubin)\nnot Suction(evita, hally)\nSuction(guy, hally)\nDetick(guy, hally)\nnot Barbecue(hally, guy)\nMyelinic(hally)\nnot Diatonic(hally)\nSuction(hally, guy)\nSuction(evita, rubin) and Suction(rubin, evita) -> not Myelinic(rubin)\nDetick(rubin, guy) -> Detick(rubin, hally)\nforall x (Tenfold(x) and Detick(x, rubin) -> not Detick(rubin, hally))\nnot Suction(rubin, guy) -> Detick(rubin, guy)\nforall x (Cosmic(x) and Barbecue(x, hally) -> not Barbecue(x, rubin))\nforall x (Detick(x, hally) -> Detick(hally, evita))\nUnrequited(evita) and not Myelinic(evita) -> Suction(evita, hally)\nforall x (Detick(x, hally) and Detick(hally, evita) -> Suction(x, rubin))\n\nDetick(hally, evita)\n\nDetick(guy, hally) and forall x (Detick(x, hally) -> Detick(hally, evita)) -> therefore Detick(hally, evita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The jojo does not see the sting. The francyne legalise the jojo. The francyne legalise the sting. The francyne is jamesian. The francyne esterify the jojo. The francyne does not see the elroy. The sting esterify the elroy. The sting shape the elroy. The elroy does not chase the sting. The elroy is jamesian. The elroy is not beheaded. The elroy esterify the sting. If the francyne esterify the jojo and the jojo esterify the francyne then the jojo is not jamesian. If the jojo shape the sting then the jojo shape the elroy. If something is sourish and it shape the jojo then the jojo does not visit the elroy. If the jojo does not see the sting then the jojo shape the sting. If something is unawakened and it legalise the elroy then it does not chase the jojo. If something shape the elroy then the elroy shape the francyne. If the francyne is jawless and the francyne is not jamesian then the francyne esterify the elroy. If something shape the elroy and the elroy shape the francyne then it esterify the jojo. The jojo does not visit the sting.", "logic": "\nnot Esterify(jojo, sting)\nLegalise(francyne, jojo)\nLegalise(francyne, sting)\nJamesian(francyne)\nEsterify(francyne, jojo)\nnot Esterify(francyne, elroy)\nEsterify(sting, elroy)\nShape(sting, elroy)\nnot Legalise(elroy, sting)\nJamesian(elroy)\nnot Beheaded(elroy)\nEsterify(elroy, sting)\nEsterify(francyne, jojo) and Esterify(jojo, francyne) -> not Jamesian(jojo)\nShape(jojo, sting) -> Shape(jojo, elroy)\nforall x (Sourish(x) and Shape(x, jojo) -> not Shape(jojo, elroy))\nnot Esterify(jojo, sting) -> Shape(jojo, sting)\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and Legalise(x, elroy) -> not Legalise(x, jojo))\nforall x (Shape(x, elroy) -> Shape(elroy, francyne))\nJawless(francyne) and not Jamesian(francyne) -> Esterify(francyne, elroy)\nforall x (Shape(x, elroy) and Shape(elroy, francyne) -> Esterify(x, jojo))\n\nnot Shape(jojo, sting)\n\nnot Esterify(jojo, sting) and not Esterify(jojo, sting) -> Shape(jojo, sting) -> therefore Shape(jojo, sting)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The nissie does not see the etienne. The hamel randomize the nissie. The hamel randomize the etienne. The hamel is seagirt. The hamel overeat the nissie. The hamel does not see the tawnya. The etienne overeat the tawnya. The etienne demobilise the tawnya. The tawnya does not chase the etienne. The tawnya is seagirt. The tawnya is not unstylish. The tawnya overeat the etienne. If the hamel overeat the nissie and the nissie overeat the hamel then the nissie is not seagirt. If the nissie demobilise the etienne then the nissie demobilise the tawnya. If something is ossified and it demobilise the nissie then the nissie does not visit the tawnya. If the nissie does not see the etienne then the nissie demobilise the etienne. If something is advertent and it randomize the tawnya then it does not chase the nissie. If something demobilise the tawnya then the tawnya demobilise the hamel. If the hamel is nettled and the hamel is not seagirt then the hamel overeat the tawnya. If something demobilise the tawnya and the tawnya demobilise the hamel then it overeat the nissie. The etienne overeat the nissie.", "logic": "\nnot Overeat(nissie, etienne)\nRandomize(hamel, nissie)\nRandomize(hamel, etienne)\nSeagirt(hamel)\nOvereat(hamel, nissie)\nnot Overeat(hamel, tawnya)\nOvereat(etienne, tawnya)\nDemobilise(etienne, tawnya)\nnot Randomize(tawnya, etienne)\nSeagirt(tawnya)\nnot Unstylish(tawnya)\nOvereat(tawnya, etienne)\nOvereat(hamel, nissie) and Overeat(nissie, hamel) -> not Seagirt(nissie)\nDemobilise(nissie, etienne) -> Demobilise(nissie, tawnya)\nforall x (Ossified(x) and Demobilise(x, nissie) -> not Demobilise(nissie, tawnya))\nnot Overeat(nissie, etienne) -> Demobilise(nissie, etienne)\nforall x (Advertent(x) and Randomize(x, tawnya) -> not Randomize(x, nissie))\nforall x (Demobilise(x, tawnya) -> Demobilise(tawnya, hamel))\nNettled(hamel) and not Seagirt(hamel) -> Overeat(hamel, tawnya)\nforall x (Demobilise(x, tawnya) and Demobilise(tawnya, hamel) -> Overeat(x, nissie))\n\nOvereat(etienne, nissie)\n\nDemobilise(etienne, tawnya) and forall x (Demobilise(x, tawnya) -> Demobilise(tawnya, hamel)) -> therefore Demobilise(tawnya, hamel) Demobilise(etienne, tawnya) and Demobilise(tawnya, hamel) and forall x (Demobilise(x, tawnya) and Demobilise(tawnya, hamel) -> Overeat(x, nissie)) -> therefore Overeat(etienne, nissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The rob does not see the maynord. The arvie coddle the rob. The arvie coddle the maynord. The arvie is lxxxv. The arvie diss the rob. The arvie does not see the shalom. The maynord diss the shalom. The maynord grain the shalom. The shalom does not chase the maynord. The shalom is lxxxv. The shalom is not mensal. The shalom diss the maynord. If the arvie diss the rob and the rob diss the arvie then the rob is not lxxxv. If the rob grain the maynord then the rob grain the shalom. If something is arrogant and it grain the rob then the rob does not visit the shalom. If the rob does not see the maynord then the rob grain the maynord. If something is gnostic and it coddle the shalom then it does not chase the rob. If something grain the shalom then the shalom grain the arvie. If the arvie is memberless and the arvie is not lxxxv then the arvie diss the shalom. If something grain the shalom and the shalom grain the arvie then it diss the rob. The maynord does not see the rob.", "logic": "\nnot Diss(rob, maynord)\nCoddle(arvie, rob)\nCoddle(arvie, maynord)\nLxxxv(arvie)\nDiss(arvie, rob)\nnot Diss(arvie, shalom)\nDiss(maynord, shalom)\nGrain(maynord, shalom)\nnot Coddle(shalom, maynord)\nLxxxv(shalom)\nnot Mensal(shalom)\nDiss(shalom, maynord)\nDiss(arvie, rob) and Diss(rob, arvie) -> not Lxxxv(rob)\nGrain(rob, maynord) -> Grain(rob, shalom)\nforall x (Arrogant(x) and Grain(x, rob) -> not Grain(rob, shalom))\nnot Diss(rob, maynord) -> Grain(rob, maynord)\nforall x (Gnostic(x) and Coddle(x, shalom) -> not Coddle(x, rob))\nforall x (Grain(x, shalom) -> Grain(shalom, arvie))\nMemberless(arvie) and not Lxxxv(arvie) -> Diss(arvie, shalom)\nforall x (Grain(x, shalom) and Grain(shalom, arvie) -> Diss(x, rob))\n\nnot Diss(maynord, rob)\n\nGrain(maynord, shalom) and forall x (Grain(x, shalom) -> Grain(shalom, arvie)) -> therefore Grain(shalom, arvie) Grain(maynord, shalom) and Grain(shalom, arvie) and forall x (Grain(x, shalom) and Grain(shalom, arvie) -> Diss(x, rob)) -> therefore Diss(maynord, rob)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The aileen does not see the irvin. The redmond ruff the aileen. The redmond ruff the irvin. The redmond is ascosporic. The redmond remediate the aileen. The redmond does not see the trixy. The irvin remediate the trixy. The irvin gimp the trixy. The trixy does not chase the irvin. The trixy is ascosporic. The trixy is not orthoptic. The trixy remediate the irvin. If the redmond remediate the aileen and the aileen remediate the redmond then the aileen is not ascosporic. If the aileen gimp the irvin then the aileen gimp the trixy. If something is fordable and it gimp the aileen then the aileen does not visit the trixy. If the aileen does not see the irvin then the aileen gimp the irvin. If something is asymmetric and it ruff the trixy then it does not chase the aileen. If something gimp the trixy then the trixy gimp the redmond. If the redmond is menial and the redmond is not ascosporic then the redmond remediate the trixy. If something gimp the trixy and the trixy gimp the redmond then it remediate the aileen. The aileen remediate the aileen.", "logic": "\nnot Remediate(aileen, irvin)\nRuff(redmond, aileen)\nRuff(redmond, irvin)\nAscosporic(redmond)\nRemediate(redmond, aileen)\nnot Remediate(redmond, trixy)\nRemediate(irvin, trixy)\nGimp(irvin, trixy)\nnot Ruff(trixy, irvin)\nAscosporic(trixy)\nnot Orthoptic(trixy)\nRemediate(trixy, irvin)\nRemediate(redmond, aileen) and Remediate(aileen, redmond) -> not Ascosporic(aileen)\nGimp(aileen, irvin) -> Gimp(aileen, trixy)\nforall x (Fordable(x) and Gimp(x, aileen) -> not Gimp(aileen, trixy))\nnot Remediate(aileen, irvin) -> Gimp(aileen, irvin)\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) and Ruff(x, trixy) -> not Ruff(x, aileen))\nforall x (Gimp(x, trixy) -> Gimp(trixy, redmond))\nMenial(redmond) and not Ascosporic(redmond) -> Remediate(redmond, trixy)\nforall x (Gimp(x, trixy) and Gimp(trixy, redmond) -> Remediate(x, aileen))\n\nRemediate(aileen, aileen)\n\nnot Remediate(aileen, irvin) and not Remediate(aileen, irvin) -> Gimp(aileen, irvin) -> therefore Gimp(aileen, irvin) Gimp(aileen, irvin) and Gimp(aileen, irvin) -> Gimp(aileen, trixy) -> therefore Gimp(aileen, trixy) Gimp(irvin, trixy) and forall x (Gimp(x, trixy) -> Gimp(trixy, redmond)) -> therefore Gimp(trixy, redmond) Gimp(aileen, trixy) and Gimp(trixy, redmond) and forall x (Gimp(x, trixy) and Gimp(trixy, redmond) -> Remediate(x, aileen)) -> therefore Remediate(aileen, aileen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The bab does not see the garth. The renard spurt the bab. The renard spurt the garth. The renard is adverbial. The renard overlie the bab. The renard does not see the wolfram. The garth overlie the wolfram. The garth engage the wolfram. The wolfram does not chase the garth. The wolfram is adverbial. The wolfram is not tenuous. The wolfram overlie the garth. If the renard overlie the bab and the bab overlie the renard then the bab is not adverbial. If the bab engage the garth then the bab engage the wolfram. If something is oily and it engage the bab then the bab does not visit the wolfram. If the bab does not see the garth then the bab engage the garth. If something is gymnastic and it spurt the wolfram then it does not chase the bab. If something engage the wolfram then the wolfram engage the renard. If the renard is augmented and the renard is not adverbial then the renard overlie the wolfram. If something engage the wolfram and the wolfram engage the renard then it overlie the bab. The bab does not see the bab.", "logic": "\nnot Overlie(bab, garth)\nSpurt(renard, bab)\nSpurt(renard, garth)\nAdverbial(renard)\nOverlie(renard, bab)\nnot Overlie(renard, wolfram)\nOverlie(garth, wolfram)\nEngage(garth, wolfram)\nnot Spurt(wolfram, garth)\nAdverbial(wolfram)\nnot Tenuous(wolfram)\nOverlie(wolfram, garth)\nOverlie(renard, bab) and Overlie(bab, renard) -> not Adverbial(bab)\nEngage(bab, garth) -> Engage(bab, wolfram)\nforall x (Oily(x) and Engage(x, bab) -> not Engage(bab, wolfram))\nnot Overlie(bab, garth) -> Engage(bab, garth)\nforall x (Gymnastic(x) and Spurt(x, wolfram) -> not Spurt(x, bab))\nforall x (Engage(x, wolfram) -> Engage(wolfram, renard))\nAugmented(renard) and not Adverbial(renard) -> Overlie(renard, wolfram)\nforall x (Engage(x, wolfram) and Engage(wolfram, renard) -> Overlie(x, bab))\n\nnot Overlie(bab, bab)\n\nnot Overlie(bab, garth) and not Overlie(bab, garth) -> Engage(bab, garth) -> therefore Engage(bab, garth) Engage(bab, garth) and Engage(bab, garth) -> Engage(bab, wolfram) -> therefore Engage(bab, wolfram) Engage(garth, wolfram) and forall x (Engage(x, wolfram) -> Engage(wolfram, renard)) -> therefore Engage(wolfram, renard) Engage(bab, wolfram) and Engage(wolfram, renard) and forall x (Engage(x, wolfram) and Engage(wolfram, renard) -> Overlie(x, bab)) -> therefore Overlie(bab, bab)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The waiter does not see the tedman. The veronika writhe the waiter. The veronika writhe the tedman. The veronika is weatherly. The veronika copyedit the waiter. The veronika does not see the iormina. The tedman copyedit the iormina. The tedman pulse the iormina. The iormina does not chase the tedman. The iormina is weatherly. The iormina is not cowardly. The iormina copyedit the tedman. If the veronika copyedit the waiter and the waiter copyedit the veronika then the waiter is not weatherly. If the waiter pulse the tedman then the waiter pulse the iormina. If something is saurian and it pulse the waiter then the waiter does not visit the iormina. If the waiter does not see the tedman then the waiter pulse the tedman. If something is calycled and it writhe the iormina then it does not chase the waiter. If something pulse the iormina then the iormina pulse the veronika. If the veronika is bubaline and the veronika is not weatherly then the veronika copyedit the iormina. If something pulse the iormina and the iormina pulse the veronika then it copyedit the waiter. The iormina does not see the waiter.", "logic": "\nnot Copyedit(waiter, tedman)\nWrithe(veronika, waiter)\nWrithe(veronika, tedman)\nWeatherly(veronika)\nCopyedit(veronika, waiter)\nnot Copyedit(veronika, iormina)\nCopyedit(tedman, iormina)\nPulse(tedman, iormina)\nnot Writhe(iormina, tedman)\nWeatherly(iormina)\nnot Cowardly(iormina)\nCopyedit(iormina, tedman)\nCopyedit(veronika, waiter) and Copyedit(waiter, veronika) -> not Weatherly(waiter)\nPulse(waiter, tedman) -> Pulse(waiter, iormina)\nforall x (Saurian(x) and Pulse(x, waiter) -> not Pulse(waiter, iormina))\nnot Copyedit(waiter, tedman) -> Pulse(waiter, tedman)\nforall x (Calycled(x) and Writhe(x, iormina) -> not Writhe(x, waiter))\nforall x (Pulse(x, iormina) -> Pulse(iormina, veronika))\nBubaline(veronika) and not Weatherly(veronika) -> Copyedit(veronika, iormina)\nforall x (Pulse(x, iormina) and Pulse(iormina, veronika) -> Copyedit(x, waiter))\n\nnot Copyedit(iormina, waiter)\n\nforall x (Pulse(x, iormina) and Pulse(iormina, veronika) -> Copyedit(x, waiter)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The dareen does not see the susanne. The laurel induce the dareen. The laurel induce the susanne. The laurel is kempt. The laurel bamboozle the dareen. The laurel does not see the rosabel. The susanne bamboozle the rosabel. The susanne hoover the rosabel. The rosabel does not chase the susanne. The rosabel is kempt. The rosabel is not cutaneal. The rosabel bamboozle the susanne. If the laurel bamboozle the dareen and the dareen bamboozle the laurel then the dareen is not kempt. If the dareen hoover the susanne then the dareen hoover the rosabel. If something is finished and it hoover the dareen then the dareen does not visit the rosabel. If the dareen does not see the susanne then the dareen hoover the susanne. If something is cyprinid and it induce the rosabel then it does not chase the dareen. If something hoover the rosabel then the rosabel hoover the laurel. If the laurel is substitute and the laurel is not kempt then the laurel bamboozle the rosabel. If something hoover the rosabel and the rosabel hoover the laurel then it bamboozle the dareen. The laurel hoover the rosabel.", "logic": "\nnot Bamboozle(dareen, susanne)\nInduce(laurel, dareen)\nInduce(laurel, susanne)\nKempt(laurel)\nBamboozle(laurel, dareen)\nnot Bamboozle(laurel, rosabel)\nBamboozle(susanne, rosabel)\nHoover(susanne, rosabel)\nnot Induce(rosabel, susanne)\nKempt(rosabel)\nnot Cutaneal(rosabel)\nBamboozle(rosabel, susanne)\nBamboozle(laurel, dareen) and Bamboozle(dareen, laurel) -> not Kempt(dareen)\nHoover(dareen, susanne) -> Hoover(dareen, rosabel)\nforall x (Finished(x) and Hoover(x, dareen) -> not Hoover(dareen, rosabel))\nnot Bamboozle(dareen, susanne) -> Hoover(dareen, susanne)\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Induce(x, rosabel) -> not Induce(x, dareen))\nforall x (Hoover(x, rosabel) -> Hoover(rosabel, laurel))\nSubstitute(laurel) and not Kempt(laurel) -> Bamboozle(laurel, rosabel)\nforall x (Hoover(x, rosabel) and Hoover(rosabel, laurel) -> Bamboozle(x, dareen))\n\nHoover(laurel, rosabel)\n\nHoover(laurel, rosabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The mel does not see the nerte. The sinclare highjack the mel. The sinclare highjack the nerte. The sinclare is amorous. The sinclare solmizate the mel. The sinclare does not see the nola. The nerte solmizate the nola. The nerte dredge the nola. The nola does not chase the nerte. The nola is amorous. The nola is not beetle. The nola solmizate the nerte. If the sinclare solmizate the mel and the mel solmizate the sinclare then the mel is not amorous. If the mel dredge the nerte then the mel dredge the nola. If something is coreferent and it dredge the mel then the mel does not visit the nola. If the mel does not see the nerte then the mel dredge the nerte. If something is potential and it highjack the nola then it does not chase the mel. If something dredge the nola then the nola dredge the sinclare. If the sinclare is unsuitable and the sinclare is not amorous then the sinclare solmizate the nola. If something dredge the nola and the nola dredge the sinclare then it solmizate the mel. The mel is not coreferent.", "logic": "\nnot Solmizate(mel, nerte)\nHighjack(sinclare, mel)\nHighjack(sinclare, nerte)\nAmorous(sinclare)\nSolmizate(sinclare, mel)\nnot Solmizate(sinclare, nola)\nSolmizate(nerte, nola)\nDredge(nerte, nola)\nnot Highjack(nola, nerte)\nAmorous(nola)\nnot Beetle(nola)\nSolmizate(nola, nerte)\nSolmizate(sinclare, mel) and Solmizate(mel, sinclare) -> not Amorous(mel)\nDredge(mel, nerte) -> Dredge(mel, nola)\nforall x (Coreferent(x) and Dredge(x, mel) -> not Dredge(mel, nola))\nnot Solmizate(mel, nerte) -> Dredge(mel, nerte)\nforall x (Potential(x) and Highjack(x, nola) -> not Highjack(x, mel))\nforall x (Dredge(x, nola) -> Dredge(nola, sinclare))\nUnsuitable(sinclare) and not Amorous(sinclare) -> Solmizate(sinclare, nola)\nforall x (Dredge(x, nola) and Dredge(nola, sinclare) -> Solmizate(x, mel))\n\nnot Coreferent(mel)\n\nnot Coreferent(mel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The socrates does not see the latashia. The oona exhale the socrates. The oona exhale the latashia. The oona is terminated. The oona slather the socrates. The oona does not see the dulcinea. The latashia slather the dulcinea. The latashia coggle the dulcinea. The dulcinea does not chase the latashia. The dulcinea is terminated. The dulcinea is not epiphyseal. The dulcinea slather the latashia. If the oona slather the socrates and the socrates slather the oona then the socrates is not terminated. If the socrates coggle the latashia then the socrates coggle the dulcinea. If something is frolicsome and it coggle the socrates then the socrates does not visit the dulcinea. If the socrates does not see the latashia then the socrates coggle the latashia. If something is horned and it exhale the dulcinea then it does not chase the socrates. If something coggle the dulcinea then the dulcinea coggle the oona. If the oona is favourable and the oona is not terminated then the oona slather the dulcinea. If something coggle the dulcinea and the dulcinea coggle the oona then it slather the socrates. The dulcinea is favourable.", "logic": "\nnot Slather(socrates, latashia)\nExhale(oona, socrates)\nExhale(oona, latashia)\nTerminated(oona)\nSlather(oona, socrates)\nnot Slather(oona, dulcinea)\nSlather(latashia, dulcinea)\nCoggle(latashia, dulcinea)\nnot Exhale(dulcinea, latashia)\nTerminated(dulcinea)\nnot Epiphyseal(dulcinea)\nSlather(dulcinea, latashia)\nSlather(oona, socrates) and Slather(socrates, oona) -> not Terminated(socrates)\nCoggle(socrates, latashia) -> Coggle(socrates, dulcinea)\nforall x (Frolicsome(x) and Coggle(x, socrates) -> not Coggle(socrates, dulcinea))\nnot Slather(socrates, latashia) -> Coggle(socrates, latashia)\nforall x (Horned(x) and Exhale(x, dulcinea) -> not Exhale(x, socrates))\nforall x (Coggle(x, dulcinea) -> Coggle(dulcinea, oona))\nFavourable(oona) and not Terminated(oona) -> Slather(oona, dulcinea)\nforall x (Coggle(x, dulcinea) and Coggle(dulcinea, oona) -> Slather(x, socrates))\n\nFavourable(dulcinea)\n\nFavourable(dulcinea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The genni does not see the amandy. The anabelle gather the genni. The anabelle gather the amandy. The anabelle is hurried. The anabelle pamper the genni. The anabelle does not see the rosaleen. The amandy pamper the rosaleen. The amandy refit the rosaleen. The rosaleen does not chase the amandy. The rosaleen is hurried. The rosaleen is not expressed. The rosaleen pamper the amandy. If the anabelle pamper the genni and the genni pamper the anabelle then the genni is not hurried. If the genni refit the amandy then the genni refit the rosaleen. If something is alike and it refit the genni then the genni does not visit the rosaleen. If the genni does not see the amandy then the genni refit the amandy. If something is idealised and it gather the rosaleen then it does not chase the genni. If something refit the rosaleen then the rosaleen refit the anabelle. If the anabelle is admittible and the anabelle is not hurried then the anabelle pamper the rosaleen. If something refit the rosaleen and the rosaleen refit the anabelle then it pamper the genni. The rosaleen is not idealised.", "logic": "\nnot Pamper(genni, amandy)\nGather(anabelle, genni)\nGather(anabelle, amandy)\nHurried(anabelle)\nPamper(anabelle, genni)\nnot Pamper(anabelle, rosaleen)\nPamper(amandy, rosaleen)\nRefit(amandy, rosaleen)\nnot Gather(rosaleen, amandy)\nHurried(rosaleen)\nnot Expressed(rosaleen)\nPamper(rosaleen, amandy)\nPamper(anabelle, genni) and Pamper(genni, anabelle) -> not Hurried(genni)\nRefit(genni, amandy) -> Refit(genni, rosaleen)\nforall x (Alike(x) and Refit(x, genni) -> not Refit(genni, rosaleen))\nnot Pamper(genni, amandy) -> Refit(genni, amandy)\nforall x (Idealised(x) and Gather(x, rosaleen) -> not Gather(x, genni))\nforall x (Refit(x, rosaleen) -> Refit(rosaleen, anabelle))\nAdmittible(anabelle) and not Hurried(anabelle) -> Pamper(anabelle, rosaleen)\nforall x (Refit(x, rosaleen) and Refit(rosaleen, anabelle) -> Pamper(x, genni))\n\nnot Idealised(rosaleen)\n\nnot Idealised(rosaleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The storey does not see the gaby. The jeremie decouple the storey. The jeremie decouple the gaby. The jeremie is sadistic. The jeremie mandate the storey. The jeremie does not see the jotham. The gaby mandate the jotham. The gaby blackmail the jotham. The jotham does not chase the gaby. The jotham is sadistic. The jotham is not unfrosted. The jotham mandate the gaby. If the jeremie mandate the storey and the storey mandate the jeremie then the storey is not sadistic. If the storey blackmail the gaby then the storey blackmail the jotham. If something is acting and it blackmail the storey then the storey does not visit the jotham. If the storey does not see the gaby then the storey blackmail the gaby. If something is unliterary and it decouple the jotham then it does not chase the storey. If something blackmail the jotham then the jotham blackmail the jeremie. If the jeremie is wingless and the jeremie is not sadistic then the jeremie mandate the jotham. If something blackmail the jotham and the jotham blackmail the jeremie then it mandate the storey. The gaby mandate the jeremie.", "logic": "\nnot Mandate(storey, gaby)\nDecouple(jeremie, storey)\nDecouple(jeremie, gaby)\nSadistic(jeremie)\nMandate(jeremie, storey)\nnot Mandate(jeremie, jotham)\nMandate(gaby, jotham)\nBlackmail(gaby, jotham)\nnot Decouple(jotham, gaby)\nSadistic(jotham)\nnot Unfrosted(jotham)\nMandate(jotham, gaby)\nMandate(jeremie, storey) and Mandate(storey, jeremie) -> not Sadistic(storey)\nBlackmail(storey, gaby) -> Blackmail(storey, jotham)\nforall x (Acting(x) and Blackmail(x, storey) -> not Blackmail(storey, jotham))\nnot Mandate(storey, gaby) -> Blackmail(storey, gaby)\nforall x (Unliterary(x) and Decouple(x, jotham) -> not Decouple(x, storey))\nforall x (Blackmail(x, jotham) -> Blackmail(jotham, jeremie))\nWingless(jeremie) and not Sadistic(jeremie) -> Mandate(jeremie, jotham)\nforall x (Blackmail(x, jotham) and Blackmail(jotham, jeremie) -> Mandate(x, storey))\n\nMandate(gaby, jeremie)\n\nMandate(gaby, jeremie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The calhoun does not see the pietra. The swen lionise the calhoun. The swen lionise the pietra. The swen is lucifugal. The swen appal the calhoun. The swen does not see the hersh. The pietra appal the hersh. The pietra drag the hersh. The hersh does not chase the pietra. The hersh is lucifugal. The hersh is not idempotent. The hersh appal the pietra. If the swen appal the calhoun and the calhoun appal the swen then the calhoun is not lucifugal. If the calhoun drag the pietra then the calhoun drag the hersh. If something is middle and it drag the calhoun then the calhoun does not visit the hersh. If the calhoun does not see the pietra then the calhoun drag the pietra. If something is geocentric and it lionise the hersh then it does not chase the calhoun. If something drag the hersh then the hersh drag the swen. If the swen is binocular and the swen is not lucifugal then the swen appal the hersh. If something drag the hersh and the hersh drag the swen then it appal the calhoun. The calhoun is not binocular.", "logic": "\nnot Appal(calhoun, pietra)\nLionise(swen, calhoun)\nLionise(swen, pietra)\nLucifugal(swen)\nAppal(swen, calhoun)\nnot Appal(swen, hersh)\nAppal(pietra, hersh)\nDrag(pietra, hersh)\nnot Lionise(hersh, pietra)\nLucifugal(hersh)\nnot Idempotent(hersh)\nAppal(hersh, pietra)\nAppal(swen, calhoun) and Appal(calhoun, swen) -> not Lucifugal(calhoun)\nDrag(calhoun, pietra) -> Drag(calhoun, hersh)\nforall x (Middle(x) and Drag(x, calhoun) -> not Drag(calhoun, hersh))\nnot Appal(calhoun, pietra) -> Drag(calhoun, pietra)\nforall x (Geocentric(x) and Lionise(x, hersh) -> not Lionise(x, calhoun))\nforall x (Drag(x, hersh) -> Drag(hersh, swen))\nBinocular(swen) and not Lucifugal(swen) -> Appal(swen, hersh)\nforall x (Drag(x, hersh) and Drag(hersh, swen) -> Appal(x, calhoun))\n\nnot Binocular(calhoun)\n\nnot Binocular(calhoun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "The shana does not see the dickey. The quinton lull the shana. The quinton lull the dickey. The quinton is agitating. The quinton hold the shana. The quinton does not see the abdel. The dickey hold the abdel. The dickey squeegee the abdel. The abdel does not chase the dickey. The abdel is agitating. The abdel is not vitiated. The abdel hold the dickey. If the quinton hold the shana and the shana hold the quinton then the shana is not agitating. If the shana squeegee the dickey then the shana squeegee the abdel. If something is utmost and it squeegee the shana then the shana does not visit the abdel. If the shana does not see the dickey then the shana squeegee the dickey. If something is standpat and it lull the abdel then it does not chase the shana. If something squeegee the abdel then the abdel squeegee the quinton. If the quinton is blae and the quinton is not agitating then the quinton hold the abdel. If something squeegee the abdel and the abdel squeegee the quinton then it hold the shana. The shana squeegee the quinton.", "logic": "\nnot Hold(shana, dickey)\nLull(quinton, shana)\nLull(quinton, dickey)\nAgitating(quinton)\nHold(quinton, shana)\nnot Hold(quinton, abdel)\nHold(dickey, abdel)\nSqueegee(dickey, abdel)\nnot Lull(abdel, dickey)\nAgitating(abdel)\nnot Vitiated(abdel)\nHold(abdel, dickey)\nHold(quinton, shana) and Hold(shana, quinton) -> not Agitating(shana)\nSqueegee(shana, dickey) -> Squeegee(shana, abdel)\nforall x (Utmost(x) and Squeegee(x, shana) -> not Squeegee(shana, abdel))\nnot Hold(shana, dickey) -> Squeegee(shana, dickey)\nforall x (Standpat(x) and Lull(x, abdel) -> not Lull(x, shana))\nforall x (Squeegee(x, abdel) -> Squeegee(abdel, quinton))\nBlae(quinton) and not Agitating(quinton) -> Hold(quinton, abdel)\nforall x (Squeegee(x, abdel) and Squeegee(abdel, quinton) -> Hold(x, shana))\n\nSqueegee(shana, quinton)\n\nSqueegee(shana, quinton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-868"} {"premises": "Anna is susurrous. Mohammed is pictorial. Harriett is sentient. Freddie is reclusive. Round things are oral. All oral things are baffled. All reclusive things are pictorial. All baffled, reclusive things are sentient. Cold things are sentient. If something is pictorial then it is oral. Mohammed is pictorial.", "logic": "\nSusurrous(anna)\nPictorial(mohammed)\nSentient(harriett)\nReclusive(freddie)\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Oral(x))\nforall x (Oral(x) -> Baffled(x))\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Pictorial(x))\nforall x (Baffled(x) and Reclusive(x) -> Sentient(x))\nforall x (Baffled(x) -> Sentient(x))\nforall x (Pictorial(x) -> Oral(x))\n\nPictorial(mohammed)\n\ntherefore Pictorial(mohammed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5556"} {"premises": "Job is viscid. Jamey is spangly. Donal is unimposing. Claudie is vendible. Round things are hermitic. All hermitic things are radiopaque. All vendible things are spangly. All radiopaque, vendible things are unimposing. Cold things are unimposing. If something is spangly then it is hermitic. Job is not viscid.", "logic": "\nViscid(job)\nSpangly(jamey)\nUnimposing(donal)\nVendible(claudie)\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nforall x (Hermitic(x) -> Radiopaque(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Spangly(x))\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) and Vendible(x) -> Unimposing(x))\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) -> Unimposing(x))\nforall x (Spangly(x) -> Hermitic(x))\n\nnot Viscid(job)\n\ntherefore Viscid(job)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5556"} {"premises": "Ruthe is crass. Andre is colored. Truda is apelike. Liane is patronised. Round things are uppermost. All uppermost things are unfailing. All patronised things are colored. All unfailing, patronised things are apelike. Cold things are apelike. If something is colored then it is uppermost. Truda is not unfailing.", "logic": "\nCrass(ruthe)\nColored(andre)\nApelike(truda)\nPatronised(liane)\nforall x (Patronised(x) -> Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Uppermost(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nforall x (Patronised(x) -> Colored(x))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) and Patronised(x) -> Apelike(x))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) -> Apelike(x))\nforall x (Colored(x) -> Uppermost(x))\n\nnot Unfailing(truda)\n\nforall x (Uppermost(x) -> Unfailing(x)) <- forall x (Colored(x) -> Uppermost(x)) <- forall x (Patronised(x) -> Colored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5556"} {"premises": "Malkah is faineant. Othella is petallike. Ruth is coltish. Randal is bulbed. Round things are glorious. All glorious things are homiletic. All bulbed things are petallike. All homiletic, bulbed things are coltish. Cold things are coltish. If something is petallike then it is glorious. Othella is bulbed.", "logic": "\nFaineant(malkah)\nPetallike(othella)\nColtish(ruth)\nBulbed(randal)\nforall x (Bulbed(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Glorious(x) -> Homiletic(x))\nforall x (Bulbed(x) -> Petallike(x))\nforall x (Homiletic(x) and Bulbed(x) -> Coltish(x))\nforall x (Homiletic(x) -> Coltish(x))\nforall x (Petallike(x) -> Glorious(x))\n\nBulbed(othella)\n\nBulbed(othella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5556"} {"premises": "The frederick is honey. All shallow things are bulging. The frederick is honey.", "logic": "\nHoney(frederick)\nforall x (Shallow(x) -> Bulging(x))\n\nHoney(frederick)\n\ntherefore Honey(frederick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6204"} {"premises": "The hannie is unschooled. All relieved things are arcuate. The hannie is not unschooled.", "logic": "\nUnschooled(hannie)\nforall x (Relieved(x) -> Arcuate(x))\n\nnot Unschooled(hannie)\n\ntherefore Unschooled(hannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6204"} {"premises": "The hermon is preserved. All katharobic things are estival. The hermon is not estival.", "logic": "\nPreserved(hermon)\nforall x (Katharobic(x) -> Estival(x))\n\nnot Estival(hermon)\n\nforall x (Katharobic(x) -> Estival(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6204"} {"premises": "The sly is unlisted. All attic things are edwardian. The sly likes the sly.", "logic": "\nUnlisted(sly)\nforall x (Attic(x) -> Edwardian(x))\n\nLikes(sly, sly)\n\nLikes(sly, sly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-6204"} {"premises": "Osgood is cruciform. Emlynn is fastidious. Kerrin is sprawly. Annetta is unordered. All prima things are not cruciform. Cold things are crashing. If something is unordered and amnionic then it is crashing. If something is cruciform and not amnionic then it is not crashing. White things are sprawly. Furry things are sprawly. Kind, unordered things are prima. If something is unordered and not amnionic then it is not fastidious. Osgood is cruciform.", "logic": "\nCruciform(osgood)\nFastidious(emlynn)\nSprawly(kerrin)\nUnordered(annetta)\nforall x (Prima(x) -> not Cruciform(x))\nforall x (Prima(x) -> Crashing(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) and Amnionic(x) -> Crashing(x))\nforall x (Cruciform(x) and not Amnionic(x) -> not Crashing(x))\nforall x (Amnionic(x) -> Sprawly(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) -> Sprawly(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) and Unordered(x) -> Prima(x))\nforall x (Unordered(x) and not Amnionic(x) -> not Fastidious(x))\n\nCruciform(osgood)\n\ntherefore Cruciform(osgood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Missie is stinking. Zollie is groomed. Adams is tubed. Rozanne is warming. All sinister things are not stinking. Cold things are fugitive. If something is warming and aphetic then it is fugitive. If something is stinking and not aphetic then it is not fugitive. White things are tubed. Furry things are tubed. Kind, warming things are sinister. If something is warming and not aphetic then it is not groomed. Zollie is not groomed.", "logic": "\nStinking(missie)\nGroomed(zollie)\nTubed(adams)\nWarming(rozanne)\nforall x (Sinister(x) -> not Stinking(x))\nforall x (Sinister(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) and Aphetic(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Stinking(x) and not Aphetic(x) -> not Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Aphetic(x) -> Tubed(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) -> Tubed(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) and Warming(x) -> Sinister(x))\nforall x (Warming(x) and not Aphetic(x) -> not Groomed(x))\n\nnot Groomed(zollie)\n\ntherefore Groomed(zollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Mae is waning. Ethelyn is unglazed. Malina is razorback. Averell is steroidal. All overriding things are not waning. Cold things are diabolical. If something is steroidal and quaint then it is diabolical. If something is waning and not quaint then it is not diabolical. White things are razorback. Furry things are razorback. Kind, steroidal things are overriding. If something is steroidal and not quaint then it is not unglazed. Averell is razorback.", "logic": "\nWaning(mae)\nUnglazed(ethelyn)\nRazorback(malina)\nSteroidal(averell)\nforall x (Overriding(x) -> not Waning(x))\nforall x (Overriding(x) -> Diabolical(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Quaint(x) -> Diabolical(x))\nforall x (Waning(x) and not Quaint(x) -> not Diabolical(x))\nforall x (Quaint(x) -> Razorback(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) -> Razorback(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) and Steroidal(x) -> Overriding(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and not Quaint(x) -> not Unglazed(x))\n\nRazorback(averell)\n\nSteroidal(averell) and forall x (Steroidal(x) -> Razorback(x)) -> therefore Razorback(averell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Tyler is oversewn. Jaymee is stalinist. Almira is tidy. Greg is retrograde. All squamulose things are not oversewn. Cold things are courageous. If something is retrograde and idolised then it is courageous. If something is oversewn and not idolised then it is not courageous. White things are tidy. Furry things are tidy. Kind, retrograde things are squamulose. If something is retrograde and not idolised then it is not stalinist. Greg is not tidy.", "logic": "\nOversewn(tyler)\nStalinist(jaymee)\nTidy(almira)\nRetrograde(greg)\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> not Oversewn(x))\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> Courageous(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) and Idolised(x) -> Courageous(x))\nforall x (Oversewn(x) and not Idolised(x) -> not Courageous(x))\nforall x (Idolised(x) -> Tidy(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) -> Tidy(x))\nforall x (Tidy(x) and Retrograde(x) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) and not Idolised(x) -> not Stalinist(x))\n\nnot Tidy(greg)\n\nRetrograde(greg) and forall x (Retrograde(x) -> Tidy(x)) -> therefore Tidy(greg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Sherie is unsullied. Jesse is ahorse. Virgilio is presto. Benoite is lethal. All stressful things are not unsullied. Cold things are roundish. If something is lethal and batrachian then it is roundish. If something is unsullied and not batrachian then it is not roundish. White things are presto. Furry things are presto. Kind, lethal things are stressful. If something is lethal and not batrachian then it is not ahorse. Benoite is stressful.", "logic": "\nUnsullied(sherie)\nAhorse(jesse)\nPresto(virgilio)\nLethal(benoite)\nforall x (Stressful(x) -> not Unsullied(x))\nforall x (Stressful(x) -> Roundish(x))\nforall x (Lethal(x) and Batrachian(x) -> Roundish(x))\nforall x (Unsullied(x) and not Batrachian(x) -> not Roundish(x))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Lethal(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Presto(x) and Lethal(x) -> Stressful(x))\nforall x (Lethal(x) and not Batrachian(x) -> not Ahorse(x))\n\nStressful(benoite)\n\nLethal(benoite) and forall x (Lethal(x) -> Presto(x)) -> therefore Presto(benoite) Presto(benoite) and Lethal(benoite) and forall x (Presto(x) and Lethal(x) -> Stressful(x)) -> therefore Stressful(benoite)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Jennette is zygotic. Nani is busybodied. Heddi is ponderable. Kerrin is little. All undone things are not zygotic. Cold things are plaguey. If something is little and fictile then it is plaguey. If something is zygotic and not fictile then it is not plaguey. White things are ponderable. Furry things are ponderable. Kind, little things are undone. If something is little and not fictile then it is not busybodied. Kerrin is not undone.", "logic": "\nZygotic(jennette)\nBusybodied(nani)\nPonderable(heddi)\nLittle(kerrin)\nforall x (Undone(x) -> not Zygotic(x))\nforall x (Undone(x) -> Plaguey(x))\nforall x (Little(x) and Fictile(x) -> Plaguey(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and not Fictile(x) -> not Plaguey(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Ponderable(x))\nforall x (Little(x) -> Ponderable(x))\nforall x (Ponderable(x) and Little(x) -> Undone(x))\nforall x (Little(x) and not Fictile(x) -> not Busybodied(x))\n\nnot Undone(kerrin)\n\nLittle(kerrin) and forall x (Little(x) -> Ponderable(x)) -> therefore Ponderable(kerrin) Ponderable(kerrin) and Little(kerrin) and forall x (Ponderable(x) and Little(x) -> Undone(x)) -> therefore Undone(kerrin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Serge is dyed. Sile is enchained. Zacharie is void. Lauretta is posed. All tubular things are not dyed. Cold things are slippy. If something is posed and bovine then it is slippy. If something is dyed and not bovine then it is not slippy. White things are void. Furry things are void. Kind, posed things are tubular. If something is posed and not bovine then it is not enchained. Lauretta is slippy.", "logic": "\nDyed(serge)\nEnchained(sile)\nVoid(zacharie)\nPosed(lauretta)\nforall x (Tubular(x) -> not Dyed(x))\nforall x (Tubular(x) -> Slippy(x))\nforall x (Posed(x) and Bovine(x) -> Slippy(x))\nforall x (Dyed(x) and not Bovine(x) -> not Slippy(x))\nforall x (Bovine(x) -> Void(x))\nforall x (Posed(x) -> Void(x))\nforall x (Void(x) and Posed(x) -> Tubular(x))\nforall x (Posed(x) and not Bovine(x) -> not Enchained(x))\n\nSlippy(lauretta)\n\nPosed(lauretta) and forall x (Posed(x) -> Void(x)) -> therefore Void(lauretta) Void(lauretta) and Posed(lauretta) and forall x (Void(x) and Posed(x) -> Tubular(x)) -> therefore Tubular(lauretta) Tubular(lauretta) and forall x (Tubular(x) -> Slippy(x)) -> therefore Slippy(lauretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Sibella is citric. Tansy is smokeless. Pembroke is sumatran. Rosalynd is tangible. All sensible things are not citric. Cold things are signed. If something is tangible and flamboyant then it is signed. If something is citric and not flamboyant then it is not signed. White things are sumatran. Furry things are sumatran. Kind, tangible things are sensible. If something is tangible and not flamboyant then it is not smokeless. Rosalynd is not signed.", "logic": "\nCitric(sibella)\nSmokeless(tansy)\nSumatran(pembroke)\nTangible(rosalynd)\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> not Citric(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> Signed(x))\nforall x (Tangible(x) and Flamboyant(x) -> Signed(x))\nforall x (Citric(x) and not Flamboyant(x) -> not Signed(x))\nforall x (Flamboyant(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nforall x (Tangible(x) -> Sumatran(x))\nforall x (Sumatran(x) and Tangible(x) -> Sensible(x))\nforall x (Tangible(x) and not Flamboyant(x) -> not Smokeless(x))\n\nnot Signed(rosalynd)\n\nTangible(rosalynd) and forall x (Tangible(x) -> Sumatran(x)) -> therefore Sumatran(rosalynd) Sumatran(rosalynd) and Tangible(rosalynd) and forall x (Sumatran(x) and Tangible(x) -> Sensible(x)) -> therefore Sensible(rosalynd) Sensible(rosalynd) and forall x (Sensible(x) -> Signed(x)) -> therefore Signed(rosalynd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Elsi is congealed. Cassandry is needy. Ray is coeval. Hill is disarming. All paradisaic things are not congealed. Cold things are scorbutic. If something is disarming and dandyish then it is scorbutic. If something is congealed and not dandyish then it is not scorbutic. White things are coeval. Furry things are coeval. Kind, disarming things are paradisaic. If something is disarming and not dandyish then it is not needy. Ray is not scorbutic.", "logic": "\nCongealed(elsi)\nNeedy(cassandry)\nCoeval(ray)\nDisarming(hill)\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) -> not Congealed(x))\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) and Dandyish(x) -> Scorbutic(x))\nforall x (Congealed(x) and not Dandyish(x) -> not Scorbutic(x))\nforall x (Dandyish(x) -> Coeval(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) -> Coeval(x))\nforall x (Coeval(x) and Disarming(x) -> Paradisaic(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) and not Dandyish(x) -> not Needy(x))\n\nnot Scorbutic(ray)\n\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) -> Scorbutic(x)) <- forall x (Coeval(x) and Disarming(x) -> Paradisaic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Slade is exogenous. Cookie is descending. Fernande is coral. Mirabel is dusky. All numinous things are not exogenous. Cold things are grouchy. If something is dusky and rallying then it is grouchy. If something is exogenous and not rallying then it is not grouchy. White things are coral. Furry things are coral. Kind, dusky things are numinous. If something is dusky and not rallying then it is not descending. Slade is numinous.", "logic": "\nExogenous(slade)\nDescending(cookie)\nCoral(fernande)\nDusky(mirabel)\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> not Exogenous(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) -> Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Rallying(x) -> Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Exogenous(x) and not Rallying(x) -> not Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Rallying(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Coral(x) and Dusky(x) -> Numinous(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) and not Rallying(x) -> not Descending(x))\n\nNuminous(slade)\n\nforall x (Coral(x) and Dusky(x) -> Numinous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Fazeel is congenital. Tully is liplike. Athene is doctorial. Jeffie is sclerosed. All astonished things are not congenital. Cold things are zany. If something is sclerosed and stomachic then it is zany. If something is congenital and not stomachic then it is not zany. White things are doctorial. Furry things are doctorial. Kind, sclerosed things are astonished. If something is sclerosed and not stomachic then it is not liplike. Athene is not astonished.", "logic": "\nCongenital(fazeel)\nLiplike(tully)\nDoctorial(athene)\nSclerosed(jeffie)\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> not Congenital(x))\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> Zany(x))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) and Stomachic(x) -> Zany(x))\nforall x (Congenital(x) and not Stomachic(x) -> not Zany(x))\nforall x (Stomachic(x) -> Doctorial(x))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Doctorial(x))\nforall x (Doctorial(x) and Sclerosed(x) -> Astonished(x))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) and not Stomachic(x) -> not Liplike(x))\n\nnot Astonished(athene)\n\nforall x (Doctorial(x) and Sclerosed(x) -> Astonished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Dania is anoestrous. Gustie is gibbous. Roz is suntanned. Samuella is jawless. All pureblood things are not anoestrous. Cold things are braw. If something is jawless and correlate then it is braw. If something is anoestrous and not correlate then it is not braw. White things are suntanned. Furry things are suntanned. Kind, jawless things are pureblood. If something is jawless and not correlate then it is not gibbous. Gustie is braw.", "logic": "\nAnoestrous(dania)\nGibbous(gustie)\nSuntanned(roz)\nJawless(samuella)\nforall x (Pureblood(x) -> not Anoestrous(x))\nforall x (Pureblood(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Jawless(x) and Correlate(x) -> Braw(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and not Correlate(x) -> not Braw(x))\nforall x (Correlate(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Jawless(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) and Jawless(x) -> Pureblood(x))\nforall x (Jawless(x) and not Correlate(x) -> not Gibbous(x))\n\nBraw(gustie)\n\nforall x (Pureblood(x) -> Braw(x)) <- forall x (Suntanned(x) and Jawless(x) -> Pureblood(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Teresita is acarpelous. Coral is bigheaded. Bert is pursuant. Willie is unearthly. All bolshevist things are not acarpelous. Cold things are colorectal. If something is unearthly and butyric then it is colorectal. If something is acarpelous and not butyric then it is not colorectal. White things are pursuant. Furry things are pursuant. Kind, unearthly things are bolshevist. If something is unearthly and not butyric then it is not bigheaded. Teresita is not bigheaded.", "logic": "\nAcarpelous(teresita)\nBigheaded(coral)\nPursuant(bert)\nUnearthly(willie)\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> not Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) and Butyric(x) -> Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and not Butyric(x) -> not Colorectal(x))\nforall x (Butyric(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) -> Pursuant(x))\nforall x (Pursuant(x) and Unearthly(x) -> Bolshevist(x))\nforall x (Unearthly(x) and not Butyric(x) -> not Bigheaded(x))\n\nnot Bigheaded(teresita)\n\nnot Bigheaded(teresita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Valencia is pulseless. Abby is pebbly. Beret is nutbrown. Jessa is cosher. All lifted things are not pulseless. Cold things are lentic. If something is cosher and veteran then it is lentic. If something is pulseless and not veteran then it is not lentic. White things are nutbrown. Furry things are nutbrown. Kind, cosher things are lifted. If something is cosher and not veteran then it is not pebbly. Beret is cosher.", "logic": "\nPulseless(valencia)\nPebbly(abby)\nNutbrown(beret)\nCosher(jessa)\nforall x (Lifted(x) -> not Pulseless(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) and Veteran(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Pulseless(x) and not Veteran(x) -> not Lentic(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) -> Nutbrown(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> Nutbrown(x))\nforall x (Nutbrown(x) and Cosher(x) -> Lifted(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) and not Veteran(x) -> not Pebbly(x))\n\nCosher(beret)\n\nCosher(beret) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Cynthie is meningeal. Horacio is polyatomic. Rustie is iodised. Lolande is forfeit. All invidious things are not meningeal. Cold things are formulary. If something is forfeit and doleful then it is formulary. If something is meningeal and not doleful then it is not formulary. White things are iodised. Furry things are iodised. Kind, forfeit things are invidious. If something is forfeit and not doleful then it is not polyatomic. Lolande is not doleful.", "logic": "\nMeningeal(cynthie)\nPolyatomic(horacio)\nIodised(rustie)\nForfeit(lolande)\nforall x (Invidious(x) -> not Meningeal(x))\nforall x (Invidious(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) and Doleful(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Meningeal(x) and not Doleful(x) -> not Formulary(x))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Iodised(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) -> Iodised(x))\nforall x (Iodised(x) and Forfeit(x) -> Invidious(x))\nforall x (Forfeit(x) and not Doleful(x) -> not Polyatomic(x))\n\nnot Doleful(lolande)\n\nnot Doleful(lolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Shirline is rustic. Stanton is uncrossed. Mildrid is rimmed. Maria is toxicant. All writhing things are not rustic. Cold things are thin. If something is toxicant and curdled then it is thin. If something is rustic and not curdled then it is not thin. White things are rimmed. Furry things are rimmed. Kind, toxicant things are writhing. If something is toxicant and not curdled then it is not uncrossed. Shirline is curdled.", "logic": "\nRustic(shirline)\nUncrossed(stanton)\nRimmed(mildrid)\nToxicant(maria)\nforall x (Writhing(x) -> not Rustic(x))\nforall x (Writhing(x) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) and Curdled(x) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Rustic(x) and not Curdled(x) -> not Thin(x))\nforall x (Curdled(x) -> Rimmed(x))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) -> Rimmed(x))\nforall x (Rimmed(x) and Toxicant(x) -> Writhing(x))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) and not Curdled(x) -> not Uncrossed(x))\n\nCurdled(shirline)\n\nCurdled(shirline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-508"} {"premises": "Noreen is saliferous. Noreen is highland. Noreen is boozy. Noreen is deviant. Noreen is not seeded. Meyer is not saliferous. Meyer is not highland. Meyer is boozy. Meyer is deviant. Meyer is stalked. Lev is saliferous. Lev is doubtful. Lev is highland. Lev is boozy. Dosi is boozy. If something is stalked and not doubtful then it is highland. If something is saliferous then it is highland. If Dosi is deviant and Dosi is highland then Dosi is not saliferous. All highland things are not seeded. If something is deviant and not stalked then it is saliferous. If Meyer is doubtful and Meyer is deviant then Meyer is boozy. Lev is boozy.", "logic": "\nSaliferous(noreen)\nHighland(noreen)\nBoozy(noreen)\nDeviant(noreen)\nnot Seeded(noreen)\nnot Saliferous(meyer)\nnot Highland(meyer)\nBoozy(meyer)\nDeviant(meyer)\nStalked(meyer)\nSaliferous(lev)\nDoubtful(lev)\nHighland(lev)\nBoozy(lev)\nBoozy(dosi)\nforall x (Stalked(x) and not Doubtful(x) -> Highland(x))\nforall x (Saliferous(x) -> Highland(x))\nDeviant(dosi) and Highland(dosi) -> not Saliferous(dosi)\nforall x (Highland(x) -> not Seeded(x))\nforall x (Deviant(x) and not Stalked(x) -> Saliferous(x))\nDoubtful(meyer) and Deviant(meyer) -> Boozy(meyer)\n\nBoozy(lev)\n\ntherefore Boozy(lev)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Freddie is polytonal. Freddie is fourfold. Freddie is metaphoric. Freddie is fixed. Freddie is not yellowish. Shandie is not polytonal. Shandie is not fourfold. Shandie is metaphoric. Shandie is fixed. Shandie is marooned. Jotham is polytonal. Jotham is prefrontal. Jotham is fourfold. Jotham is metaphoric. Linus is metaphoric. If something is marooned and not prefrontal then it is fourfold. If something is polytonal then it is fourfold. If Linus is fixed and Linus is fourfold then Linus is not polytonal. All fourfold things are not yellowish. If something is fixed and not marooned then it is polytonal. If Shandie is prefrontal and Shandie is fixed then Shandie is metaphoric. Shandie is not metaphoric.", "logic": "\nPolytonal(freddie)\nFourfold(freddie)\nMetaphoric(freddie)\nFixed(freddie)\nnot Yellowish(freddie)\nnot Polytonal(shandie)\nnot Fourfold(shandie)\nMetaphoric(shandie)\nFixed(shandie)\nMarooned(shandie)\nPolytonal(jotham)\nPrefrontal(jotham)\nFourfold(jotham)\nMetaphoric(jotham)\nMetaphoric(linus)\nforall x (Marooned(x) and not Prefrontal(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Fourfold(x))\nFixed(linus) and Fourfold(linus) -> not Polytonal(linus)\nforall x (Fourfold(x) -> not Yellowish(x))\nforall x (Fixed(x) and not Marooned(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nPrefrontal(shandie) and Fixed(shandie) -> Metaphoric(shandie)\n\nnot Metaphoric(shandie)\n\ntherefore Metaphoric(shandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Madison is aplitic. Madison is chargeable. Madison is drugged. Madison is tortured. Madison is not nebulose. Koren is not aplitic. Koren is not chargeable. Koren is drugged. Koren is tortured. Koren is rawboned. Lefty is aplitic. Lefty is corpulent. Lefty is chargeable. Lefty is drugged. Petra is drugged. If something is rawboned and not corpulent then it is chargeable. If something is aplitic then it is chargeable. If Petra is tortured and Petra is chargeable then Petra is not aplitic. All chargeable things are not nebulose. If something is tortured and not rawboned then it is aplitic. If Koren is corpulent and Koren is tortured then Koren is drugged. Lefty is not nebulose.", "logic": "\nAplitic(madison)\nChargeable(madison)\nDrugged(madison)\nTortured(madison)\nnot Nebulose(madison)\nnot Aplitic(koren)\nnot Chargeable(koren)\nDrugged(koren)\nTortured(koren)\nRawboned(koren)\nAplitic(lefty)\nCorpulent(lefty)\nChargeable(lefty)\nDrugged(lefty)\nDrugged(petra)\nforall x (Rawboned(x) and not Corpulent(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Aplitic(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nTortured(petra) and Chargeable(petra) -> not Aplitic(petra)\nforall x (Chargeable(x) -> not Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Tortured(x) and not Rawboned(x) -> Aplitic(x))\nCorpulent(koren) and Tortured(koren) -> Drugged(koren)\n\nnot Nebulose(lefty)\n\nChargeable(lefty) and forall x (Chargeable(x) -> not Nebulose(x)) -> therefore not Nebulose(lefty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Willyt is praetorial. Willyt is collateral. Willyt is overnight. Willyt is ornate. Willyt is not collective. Darcey is not praetorial. Darcey is not collateral. Darcey is overnight. Darcey is ornate. Darcey is lean. Weber is praetorial. Weber is drawn. Weber is collateral. Weber is overnight. Farah is overnight. If something is lean and not drawn then it is collateral. If something is praetorial then it is collateral. If Farah is ornate and Farah is collateral then Farah is not praetorial. All collateral things are not collective. If something is ornate and not lean then it is praetorial. If Darcey is drawn and Darcey is ornate then Darcey is overnight. Weber is collective.", "logic": "\nPraetorial(willyt)\nCollateral(willyt)\nOvernight(willyt)\nOrnate(willyt)\nnot Collective(willyt)\nnot Praetorial(darcey)\nnot Collateral(darcey)\nOvernight(darcey)\nOrnate(darcey)\nLean(darcey)\nPraetorial(weber)\nDrawn(weber)\nCollateral(weber)\nOvernight(weber)\nOvernight(farah)\nforall x (Lean(x) and not Drawn(x) -> Collateral(x))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) -> Collateral(x))\nOrnate(farah) and Collateral(farah) -> not Praetorial(farah)\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> not Collective(x))\nforall x (Ornate(x) and not Lean(x) -> Praetorial(x))\nDrawn(darcey) and Ornate(darcey) -> Overnight(darcey)\n\nCollective(weber)\n\nCollateral(weber) and forall x (Collateral(x) -> not Collective(x)) -> therefore not Collective(weber)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Mechelle is autolytic. Mechelle is medial. Mechelle is palatial. Mechelle is apodictic. Mechelle is not agreeable. Carmen is not autolytic. Carmen is not medial. Carmen is palatial. Carmen is apodictic. Carmen is lxxii. Aloysius is autolytic. Aloysius is unalike. Aloysius is medial. Aloysius is palatial. Barbara is palatial. If something is lxxii and not unalike then it is medial. If something is autolytic then it is medial. If Barbara is apodictic and Barbara is medial then Barbara is not autolytic. All medial things are not agreeable. If something is apodictic and not lxxii then it is autolytic. If Carmen is unalike and Carmen is apodictic then Carmen is palatial. Barbara is not medial.", "logic": "\nAutolytic(mechelle)\nMedial(mechelle)\nPalatial(mechelle)\nApodictic(mechelle)\nnot Agreeable(mechelle)\nnot Autolytic(carmen)\nnot Medial(carmen)\nPalatial(carmen)\nApodictic(carmen)\nLxxii(carmen)\nAutolytic(aloysius)\nUnalike(aloysius)\nMedial(aloysius)\nPalatial(aloysius)\nPalatial(barbara)\nforall x (Lxxii(x) and not Unalike(x) -> Medial(x))\nforall x (Autolytic(x) -> Medial(x))\nApodictic(barbara) and Medial(barbara) -> not Autolytic(barbara)\nforall x (Medial(x) -> not Agreeable(x))\nforall x (Apodictic(x) and not Lxxii(x) -> Autolytic(x))\nUnalike(carmen) and Apodictic(carmen) -> Palatial(carmen)\n\nnot Medial(barbara)\n\nforall x (Autolytic(x) -> Medial(x)) <- forall x (Apodictic(x) and not Lxxii(x) -> Autolytic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Henrietta is causal. Henrietta is loved. Henrietta is juicy. Henrietta is then. Henrietta is not inconstant. Georgena is not causal. Georgena is not loved. Georgena is juicy. Georgena is then. Georgena is hispanic. Aurelia is causal. Aurelia is liable. Aurelia is loved. Aurelia is juicy. Cynthie is juicy. If something is hispanic and not liable then it is loved. If something is causal then it is loved. If Cynthie is then and Cynthie is loved then Cynthie is not causal. All loved things are not inconstant. If something is then and not hispanic then it is causal. If Georgena is liable and Georgena is then then Georgena is juicy. Cynthie is causal.", "logic": "\nCausal(henrietta)\nLoved(henrietta)\nJuicy(henrietta)\nThen(henrietta)\nnot Inconstant(henrietta)\nnot Causal(georgena)\nnot Loved(georgena)\nJuicy(georgena)\nThen(georgena)\nHispanic(georgena)\nCausal(aurelia)\nLiable(aurelia)\nLoved(aurelia)\nJuicy(aurelia)\nJuicy(cynthie)\nforall x (Hispanic(x) and not Liable(x) -> Loved(x))\nforall x (Causal(x) -> Loved(x))\nThen(cynthie) and Loved(cynthie) -> not Causal(cynthie)\nforall x (Loved(x) -> not Inconstant(x))\nforall x (Then(x) and not Hispanic(x) -> Causal(x))\nLiable(georgena) and Then(georgena) -> Juicy(georgena)\n\nCausal(cynthie)\n\nforall x (Then(x) and not Hispanic(x) -> Causal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Ailyn is fractional. Ailyn is placative. Ailyn is liveried. Ailyn is every. Ailyn is not accumbent. Allene is not fractional. Allene is not placative. Allene is liveried. Allene is every. Allene is dazed. Abdel is fractional. Abdel is sleazy. Abdel is placative. Abdel is liveried. Jethro is liveried. If something is dazed and not sleazy then it is placative. If something is fractional then it is placative. If Jethro is every and Jethro is placative then Jethro is not fractional. All placative things are not accumbent. If something is every and not dazed then it is fractional. If Allene is sleazy and Allene is every then Allene is liveried. Jethro is not accumbent.", "logic": "\nFractional(ailyn)\nPlacative(ailyn)\nLiveried(ailyn)\nEvery(ailyn)\nnot Accumbent(ailyn)\nnot Fractional(allene)\nnot Placative(allene)\nLiveried(allene)\nEvery(allene)\nDazed(allene)\nFractional(abdel)\nSleazy(abdel)\nPlacative(abdel)\nLiveried(abdel)\nLiveried(jethro)\nforall x (Dazed(x) and not Sleazy(x) -> Placative(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) -> Placative(x))\nEvery(jethro) and Placative(jethro) -> not Fractional(jethro)\nforall x (Placative(x) -> not Accumbent(x))\nforall x (Every(x) and not Dazed(x) -> Fractional(x))\nSleazy(allene) and Every(allene) -> Liveried(allene)\n\nnot Accumbent(jethro)\n\nnot Accumbent(jethro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Marjie is dyslexic. Marjie is remote. Marjie is reviving. Marjie is subhuman. Marjie is not unvigilant. Laverna is not dyslexic. Laverna is not remote. Laverna is reviving. Laverna is subhuman. Laverna is unalert. Emanuel is dyslexic. Emanuel is feminist. Emanuel is remote. Emanuel is reviving. Lurette is reviving. If something is unalert and not feminist then it is remote. If something is dyslexic then it is remote. If Lurette is subhuman and Lurette is remote then Lurette is not dyslexic. All remote things are not unvigilant. If something is subhuman and not unalert then it is dyslexic. If Laverna is feminist and Laverna is subhuman then Laverna is reviving. Marjie is feminist.", "logic": "\nDyslexic(marjie)\nRemote(marjie)\nReviving(marjie)\nSubhuman(marjie)\nnot Unvigilant(marjie)\nnot Dyslexic(laverna)\nnot Remote(laverna)\nReviving(laverna)\nSubhuman(laverna)\nUnalert(laverna)\nDyslexic(emanuel)\nFeminist(emanuel)\nRemote(emanuel)\nReviving(emanuel)\nReviving(lurette)\nforall x (Unalert(x) and not Feminist(x) -> Remote(x))\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) -> Remote(x))\nSubhuman(lurette) and Remote(lurette) -> not Dyslexic(lurette)\nforall x (Remote(x) -> not Unvigilant(x))\nforall x (Subhuman(x) and not Unalert(x) -> Dyslexic(x))\nFeminist(laverna) and Subhuman(laverna) -> Reviving(laverna)\n\nFeminist(marjie)\n\nFeminist(marjie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-293"} {"premises": "Lynda is agonal. Kordula is lentic. Karolina is uniovular. Karolina is bicentric. Karolina is papery. Virge is agonal. Virge is bicentric. If Kordula is papery and Kordula is lentic then Kordula is bicentric. If someone is bicentric then they are lentic. All agonal, papery people are mute. Red, quadruple people are papery. All lentic people are agonal. If someone is papery and lentic then they are bicentric. All uniovular, mute people are bicentric. Smart, papery people are bicentric. Karolina is papery.", "logic": "\nAgonal(lynda)\nLentic(kordula)\nUniovular(karolina)\nBicentric(karolina)\nPapery(karolina)\nAgonal(virge)\nBicentric(virge)\nPapery(kordula) and Lentic(kordula) -> Bicentric(kordula)\nforall x (Bicentric(x) -> Lentic(x))\nforall x (Agonal(x) and Papery(x) -> Mute(x))\nforall x (Bicentric(x) and Quadruple(x) -> Papery(x))\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Papery(x) and Lentic(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Uniovular(x) and Mute(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Mute(x) and Papery(x) -> Bicentric(x))\n\nPapery(karolina)\n\ntherefore Papery(karolina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Helise is delimited. Delores is unfailing. Peggy is opposite. Peggy is pentagonal. Peggy is aureate. Pauletta is delimited. Pauletta is pentagonal. If Delores is aureate and Delores is unfailing then Delores is pentagonal. If someone is pentagonal then they are unfailing. All delimited, aureate people are nonelected. Red, hysterical people are aureate. All unfailing people are delimited. If someone is aureate and unfailing then they are pentagonal. All opposite, nonelected people are pentagonal. Smart, aureate people are pentagonal. Pauletta is not pentagonal.", "logic": "\nDelimited(helise)\nUnfailing(delores)\nOpposite(peggy)\nPentagonal(peggy)\nAureate(peggy)\nDelimited(pauletta)\nPentagonal(pauletta)\nAureate(delores) and Unfailing(delores) -> Pentagonal(delores)\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nforall x (Delimited(x) and Aureate(x) -> Nonelected(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) and Hysterical(x) -> Aureate(x))\nforall x (Unfailing(x) -> Delimited(x))\nforall x (Aureate(x) and Unfailing(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Opposite(x) and Nonelected(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) and Aureate(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\n\nnot Pentagonal(pauletta)\n\ntherefore Pentagonal(pauletta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Amadeus is granted. Madelena is saponified. Umeko is headlong. Umeko is grammatic. Umeko is unlimited. Jacques is granted. Jacques is grammatic. If Madelena is unlimited and Madelena is saponified then Madelena is grammatic. If someone is grammatic then they are saponified. All granted, unlimited people are humane. Red, fissile people are unlimited. All saponified people are granted. If someone is unlimited and saponified then they are grammatic. All headlong, humane people are grammatic. Smart, unlimited people are grammatic. Madelena is granted.", "logic": "\nGranted(amadeus)\nSaponified(madelena)\nHeadlong(umeko)\nGrammatic(umeko)\nUnlimited(umeko)\nGranted(jacques)\nGrammatic(jacques)\nUnlimited(madelena) and Saponified(madelena) -> Grammatic(madelena)\nforall x (Grammatic(x) -> Saponified(x))\nforall x (Granted(x) and Unlimited(x) -> Humane(x))\nforall x (Grammatic(x) and Fissile(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Saponified(x) -> Granted(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and Saponified(x) -> Grammatic(x))\nforall x (Headlong(x) and Humane(x) -> Grammatic(x))\nforall x (Humane(x) and Unlimited(x) -> Grammatic(x))\n\nGranted(madelena)\n\nSaponified(madelena) and forall x (Saponified(x) -> Granted(x)) -> therefore Granted(madelena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Talya is panoptical. Neddie is veteran. Adele is yawning. Adele is cleavable. Adele is sixth. Anjanette is panoptical. Anjanette is cleavable. If Neddie is sixth and Neddie is veteran then Neddie is cleavable. If someone is cleavable then they are veteran. All panoptical, sixth people are andorran. Red, euphonical people are sixth. All veteran people are panoptical. If someone is sixth and veteran then they are cleavable. All yawning, andorran people are cleavable. Smart, sixth people are cleavable. Anjanette is not veteran.", "logic": "\nPanoptical(talya)\nVeteran(neddie)\nYawning(adele)\nCleavable(adele)\nSixth(adele)\nPanoptical(anjanette)\nCleavable(anjanette)\nSixth(neddie) and Veteran(neddie) -> Cleavable(neddie)\nforall x (Cleavable(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) and Sixth(x) -> Andorran(x))\nforall x (Cleavable(x) and Euphonical(x) -> Sixth(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Sixth(x) and Veteran(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Yawning(x) and Andorran(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Andorran(x) and Sixth(x) -> Cleavable(x))\n\nnot Veteran(anjanette)\n\nCleavable(anjanette) and forall x (Cleavable(x) -> Veteran(x)) -> therefore Veteran(anjanette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Webster is vulnerable. Laryssa is lightless. Annabel is circuitous. Annabel is uneducated. Annabel is biramous. Virginia is vulnerable. Virginia is uneducated. If Laryssa is biramous and Laryssa is lightless then Laryssa is uneducated. If someone is uneducated then they are lightless. All vulnerable, biramous people are sterile. Red, pineal people are biramous. All lightless people are vulnerable. If someone is biramous and lightless then they are uneducated. All circuitous, sterile people are uneducated. Smart, biramous people are uneducated. Annabel is vulnerable.", "logic": "\nVulnerable(webster)\nLightless(laryssa)\nCircuitous(annabel)\nUneducated(annabel)\nBiramous(annabel)\nVulnerable(virginia)\nUneducated(virginia)\nBiramous(laryssa) and Lightless(laryssa) -> Uneducated(laryssa)\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Lightless(x))\nforall x (Vulnerable(x) and Biramous(x) -> Sterile(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Pineal(x) -> Biramous(x))\nforall x (Lightless(x) -> Vulnerable(x))\nforall x (Biramous(x) and Lightless(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Circuitous(x) and Sterile(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Sterile(x) and Biramous(x) -> Uneducated(x))\n\nVulnerable(annabel)\n\nUneducated(annabel) and forall x (Uneducated(x) -> Lightless(x)) -> therefore Lightless(annabel) Lightless(annabel) and forall x (Lightless(x) -> Vulnerable(x)) -> therefore Vulnerable(annabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Pen is amnesiac. Nancy is untied. Wilfrid is curable. Wilfrid is nepali. Wilfrid is scruffy. Oralia is amnesiac. Oralia is nepali. If Nancy is scruffy and Nancy is untied then Nancy is nepali. If someone is nepali then they are untied. All amnesiac, scruffy people are surprised. Red, prevalent people are scruffy. All untied people are amnesiac. If someone is scruffy and untied then they are nepali. All curable, surprised people are nepali. Smart, scruffy people are nepali. Wilfrid is not amnesiac.", "logic": "\nAmnesiac(pen)\nUntied(nancy)\nCurable(wilfrid)\nNepali(wilfrid)\nScruffy(wilfrid)\nAmnesiac(oralia)\nNepali(oralia)\nScruffy(nancy) and Untied(nancy) -> Nepali(nancy)\nforall x (Nepali(x) -> Untied(x))\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) and Scruffy(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Nepali(x) and Prevalent(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Untied(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Scruffy(x) and Untied(x) -> Nepali(x))\nforall x (Curable(x) and Surprised(x) -> Nepali(x))\nforall x (Surprised(x) and Scruffy(x) -> Nepali(x))\n\nnot Amnesiac(wilfrid)\n\nNepali(wilfrid) and forall x (Nepali(x) -> Untied(x)) -> therefore Untied(wilfrid) Untied(wilfrid) and forall x (Untied(x) -> Amnesiac(x)) -> therefore Amnesiac(wilfrid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Phyllis is cosy. Roberto is subaltern. Sabrina is excursive. Sabrina is puerile. Sabrina is sevenfold. Marina is cosy. Marina is puerile. If Roberto is sevenfold and Roberto is subaltern then Roberto is puerile. If someone is puerile then they are subaltern. All cosy, sevenfold people are placating. Red, fuzzed people are sevenfold. All subaltern people are cosy. If someone is sevenfold and subaltern then they are puerile. All excursive, placating people are puerile. Smart, sevenfold people are puerile. Sabrina is placating.", "logic": "\nCosy(phyllis)\nSubaltern(roberto)\nExcursive(sabrina)\nPuerile(sabrina)\nSevenfold(sabrina)\nCosy(marina)\nPuerile(marina)\nSevenfold(roberto) and Subaltern(roberto) -> Puerile(roberto)\nforall x (Puerile(x) -> Subaltern(x))\nforall x (Cosy(x) and Sevenfold(x) -> Placating(x))\nforall x (Puerile(x) and Fuzzed(x) -> Sevenfold(x))\nforall x (Subaltern(x) -> Cosy(x))\nforall x (Sevenfold(x) and Subaltern(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Placating(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) and Sevenfold(x) -> Puerile(x))\n\nPlacating(sabrina)\n\nPuerile(sabrina) and forall x (Puerile(x) -> Subaltern(x)) -> therefore Subaltern(sabrina) Subaltern(sabrina) and forall x (Subaltern(x) -> Cosy(x)) -> therefore Cosy(sabrina) Cosy(sabrina) and Sevenfold(sabrina) and forall x (Cosy(x) and Sevenfold(x) -> Placating(x)) -> therefore Placating(sabrina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "William is manorial. Crista is forficate. Aubert is pantheist. Aubert is compressed. Aubert is acentric. Iolande is manorial. Iolande is compressed. If Crista is acentric and Crista is forficate then Crista is compressed. If someone is compressed then they are forficate. All manorial, acentric people are gilt. Red, necrotic people are acentric. All forficate people are manorial. If someone is acentric and forficate then they are compressed. All pantheist, gilt people are compressed. Smart, acentric people are compressed. Aubert is not gilt.", "logic": "\nManorial(william)\nForficate(crista)\nPantheist(aubert)\nCompressed(aubert)\nAcentric(aubert)\nManorial(iolande)\nCompressed(iolande)\nAcentric(crista) and Forficate(crista) -> Compressed(crista)\nforall x (Compressed(x) -> Forficate(x))\nforall x (Manorial(x) and Acentric(x) -> Gilt(x))\nforall x (Compressed(x) and Necrotic(x) -> Acentric(x))\nforall x (Forficate(x) -> Manorial(x))\nforall x (Acentric(x) and Forficate(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) and Gilt(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Gilt(x) and Acentric(x) -> Compressed(x))\n\nnot Gilt(aubert)\n\nCompressed(aubert) and forall x (Compressed(x) -> Forficate(x)) -> therefore Forficate(aubert) Forficate(aubert) and forall x (Forficate(x) -> Manorial(x)) -> therefore Manorial(aubert) Manorial(aubert) and Acentric(aubert) and forall x (Manorial(x) and Acentric(x) -> Gilt(x)) -> therefore Gilt(aubert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Alysa is evacuant. Charles is piebald. Mireielle is venal. Mireielle is ignescent. Mireielle is unguided. Cybill is evacuant. Cybill is ignescent. If Charles is unguided and Charles is piebald then Charles is ignescent. If someone is ignescent then they are piebald. All evacuant, unguided people are silvan. Red, balding people are unguided. All piebald people are evacuant. If someone is unguided and piebald then they are ignescent. All venal, silvan people are ignescent. Smart, unguided people are ignescent. Alysa is not unguided.", "logic": "\nEvacuant(alysa)\nPiebald(charles)\nVenal(mireielle)\nIgnescent(mireielle)\nUnguided(mireielle)\nEvacuant(cybill)\nIgnescent(cybill)\nUnguided(charles) and Piebald(charles) -> Ignescent(charles)\nforall x (Ignescent(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) and Unguided(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Ignescent(x) and Balding(x) -> Unguided(x))\nforall x (Piebald(x) -> Evacuant(x))\nforall x (Unguided(x) and Piebald(x) -> Ignescent(x))\nforall x (Venal(x) and Silvan(x) -> Ignescent(x))\nforall x (Silvan(x) and Unguided(x) -> Ignescent(x))\n\nnot Unguided(alysa)\n\nforall x (Ignescent(x) and Balding(x) -> Unguided(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Puff is lenten. Bartlett is pareve. Mercy is slushy. Mercy is mouselike. Mercy is bored. Gwynne is lenten. Gwynne is mouselike. If Bartlett is bored and Bartlett is pareve then Bartlett is mouselike. If someone is mouselike then they are pareve. All lenten, bored people are formless. Red, found people are bored. All pareve people are lenten. If someone is bored and pareve then they are mouselike. All slushy, formless people are mouselike. Smart, bored people are mouselike. Gwynne is formless.", "logic": "\nLenten(puff)\nPareve(bartlett)\nSlushy(mercy)\nMouselike(mercy)\nBored(mercy)\nLenten(gwynne)\nMouselike(gwynne)\nBored(bartlett) and Pareve(bartlett) -> Mouselike(bartlett)\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Pareve(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) and Bored(x) -> Formless(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) and Found(x) -> Bored(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Lenten(x))\nforall x (Bored(x) and Pareve(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Slushy(x) and Formless(x) -> Mouselike(x))\nforall x (Formless(x) and Bored(x) -> Mouselike(x))\n\nFormless(gwynne)\n\nforall x (Lenten(x) and Bored(x) -> Formless(x)) <- forall x (Mouselike(x) and Found(x) -> Bored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Lincoln is stepwise. Beatrice is cetacean. Katti is unclad. Katti is educative. Katti is borated. Doretta is stepwise. Doretta is educative. If Beatrice is borated and Beatrice is cetacean then Beatrice is educative. If someone is educative then they are cetacean. All stepwise, borated people are inpouring. Red, witting people are borated. All cetacean people are stepwise. If someone is borated and cetacean then they are educative. All unclad, inpouring people are educative. Smart, borated people are educative. Beatrice is not educative.", "logic": "\nStepwise(lincoln)\nCetacean(beatrice)\nUnclad(katti)\nEducative(katti)\nBorated(katti)\nStepwise(doretta)\nEducative(doretta)\nBorated(beatrice) and Cetacean(beatrice) -> Educative(beatrice)\nforall x (Educative(x) -> Cetacean(x))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) and Borated(x) -> Inpouring(x))\nforall x (Educative(x) and Witting(x) -> Borated(x))\nforall x (Cetacean(x) -> Stepwise(x))\nforall x (Borated(x) and Cetacean(x) -> Educative(x))\nforall x (Unclad(x) and Inpouring(x) -> Educative(x))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) and Borated(x) -> Educative(x))\n\nnot Educative(beatrice)\n\nBorated(beatrice) and Cetacean(beatrice) -> Educative(beatrice) <- forall x (Educative(x) and Witting(x) -> Borated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Whit is wretched. Stephanus is unequal. Sivert is follicular. Sivert is casteless. Sivert is eyed. Yance is wretched. Yance is casteless. If Stephanus is eyed and Stephanus is unequal then Stephanus is casteless. If someone is casteless then they are unequal. All wretched, eyed people are papistical. Red, amoeban people are eyed. All unequal people are wretched. If someone is eyed and unequal then they are casteless. All follicular, papistical people are casteless. Smart, eyed people are casteless. Whit is casteless.", "logic": "\nWretched(whit)\nUnequal(stephanus)\nFollicular(sivert)\nCasteless(sivert)\nEyed(sivert)\nWretched(yance)\nCasteless(yance)\nEyed(stephanus) and Unequal(stephanus) -> Casteless(stephanus)\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Wretched(x) and Eyed(x) -> Papistical(x))\nforall x (Casteless(x) and Amoeban(x) -> Eyed(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Eyed(x) and Unequal(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Follicular(x) and Papistical(x) -> Casteless(x))\nforall x (Papistical(x) and Eyed(x) -> Casteless(x))\n\nCasteless(whit)\n\nforall x (Eyed(x) and Unequal(x) -> Casteless(x)) <- forall x (Casteless(x) and Amoeban(x) -> Eyed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Deidre is jellylike. Abdel is metric. Magdaia is tortuous. Magdaia is apparent. Magdaia is ironic. Hyatt is jellylike. Hyatt is apparent. If Abdel is ironic and Abdel is metric then Abdel is apparent. If someone is apparent then they are metric. All jellylike, ironic people are feculent. Red, mint people are ironic. All metric people are jellylike. If someone is ironic and metric then they are apparent. All tortuous, feculent people are apparent. Smart, ironic people are apparent. Hyatt is not mint.", "logic": "\nJellylike(deidre)\nMetric(abdel)\nTortuous(magdaia)\nApparent(magdaia)\nIronic(magdaia)\nJellylike(hyatt)\nApparent(hyatt)\nIronic(abdel) and Metric(abdel) -> Apparent(abdel)\nforall x (Apparent(x) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Jellylike(x) and Ironic(x) -> Feculent(x))\nforall x (Apparent(x) and Mint(x) -> Ironic(x))\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Jellylike(x))\nforall x (Ironic(x) and Metric(x) -> Apparent(x))\nforall x (Tortuous(x) and Feculent(x) -> Apparent(x))\nforall x (Feculent(x) and Ironic(x) -> Apparent(x))\n\nnot Mint(hyatt)\n\nnot Mint(hyatt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Othelia is barrelled. Lizzie is scanty. Sheffield is interwoven. Sheffield is delayed. Sheffield is preanal. Guillermo is barrelled. Guillermo is delayed. If Lizzie is preanal and Lizzie is scanty then Lizzie is delayed. If someone is delayed then they are scanty. All barrelled, preanal people are bivariate. Red, cultivated people are preanal. All scanty people are barrelled. If someone is preanal and scanty then they are delayed. All interwoven, bivariate people are delayed. Smart, preanal people are delayed. Othelia is interwoven.", "logic": "\nBarrelled(othelia)\nScanty(lizzie)\nInterwoven(sheffield)\nDelayed(sheffield)\nPreanal(sheffield)\nBarrelled(guillermo)\nDelayed(guillermo)\nPreanal(lizzie) and Scanty(lizzie) -> Delayed(lizzie)\nforall x (Delayed(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Barrelled(x) and Preanal(x) -> Bivariate(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Scanty(x) -> Barrelled(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) and Scanty(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Bivariate(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Bivariate(x) and Preanal(x) -> Delayed(x))\n\nInterwoven(othelia)\n\nInterwoven(othelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Carleen is agonized. Dickie is engaged. Horacio is timely. Horacio is pyrogenic. Horacio is frosty. Tarrance is agonized. Tarrance is pyrogenic. If Dickie is frosty and Dickie is engaged then Dickie is pyrogenic. If someone is pyrogenic then they are engaged. All agonized, frosty people are irrational. Red, renunciant people are frosty. All engaged people are agonized. If someone is frosty and engaged then they are pyrogenic. All timely, irrational people are pyrogenic. Smart, frosty people are pyrogenic. Horacio is not renunciant.", "logic": "\nAgonized(carleen)\nEngaged(dickie)\nTimely(horacio)\nPyrogenic(horacio)\nFrosty(horacio)\nAgonized(tarrance)\nPyrogenic(tarrance)\nFrosty(dickie) and Engaged(dickie) -> Pyrogenic(dickie)\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) -> Engaged(x))\nforall x (Agonized(x) and Frosty(x) -> Irrational(x))\nforall x (Pyrogenic(x) and Renunciant(x) -> Frosty(x))\nforall x (Engaged(x) -> Agonized(x))\nforall x (Frosty(x) and Engaged(x) -> Pyrogenic(x))\nforall x (Timely(x) and Irrational(x) -> Pyrogenic(x))\nforall x (Irrational(x) and Frosty(x) -> Pyrogenic(x))\n\nnot Renunciant(horacio)\n\nnot Renunciant(horacio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Merilyn is couthie. Faythe is straight. Fey is allergenic. Fey is cacuminal. Fey is sweptback. Beatrix is couthie. Beatrix is cacuminal. If Faythe is sweptback and Faythe is straight then Faythe is cacuminal. If someone is cacuminal then they are straight. All couthie, sweptback people are racemose. Red, married people are sweptback. All straight people are couthie. If someone is sweptback and straight then they are cacuminal. All allergenic, racemose people are cacuminal. Smart, sweptback people are cacuminal. Faythe is married.", "logic": "\nCouthie(merilyn)\nStraight(faythe)\nAllergenic(fey)\nCacuminal(fey)\nSweptback(fey)\nCouthie(beatrix)\nCacuminal(beatrix)\nSweptback(faythe) and Straight(faythe) -> Cacuminal(faythe)\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) -> Straight(x))\nforall x (Couthie(x) and Sweptback(x) -> Racemose(x))\nforall x (Cacuminal(x) and Married(x) -> Sweptback(x))\nforall x (Straight(x) -> Couthie(x))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and Straight(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Allergenic(x) and Racemose(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\nforall x (Racemose(x) and Sweptback(x) -> Cacuminal(x))\n\nMarried(faythe)\n\nMarried(faythe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1892"} {"premises": "Aurlie is hardcore. Aurlie is fistulous. Mahesh is hardcore. Mahesh is fistulous. Mahesh is calloused. Udale is tusked. Udale is thickening. All hardcore, papuan things are offhand. If Udale is papuan and Udale is thickening then Udale is hardcore. Blue, thickening things are papuan. Aurlie is hardcore.", "logic": "\nHardcore(aurlie)\nFistulous(aurlie)\nHardcore(mahesh)\nFistulous(mahesh)\nCalloused(mahesh)\nTusked(udale)\nThickening(udale)\nforall x (Hardcore(x) and Papuan(x) -> Offhand(x))\nPapuan(udale) and Thickening(udale) -> Hardcore(udale)\nforall x (Tusked(x) and Thickening(x) -> Papuan(x))\n\nHardcore(aurlie)\n\ntherefore Hardcore(aurlie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Calhoun is addicted. Calhoun is unfading. Doyle is addicted. Doyle is unfading. Doyle is damning. Thatcher is younger. Thatcher is whiskery. All addicted, cavalier things are void. If Thatcher is cavalier and Thatcher is whiskery then Thatcher is addicted. Blue, whiskery things are cavalier. Doyle is not damning.", "logic": "\nAddicted(calhoun)\nUnfading(calhoun)\nAddicted(doyle)\nUnfading(doyle)\nDamning(doyle)\nYounger(thatcher)\nWhiskery(thatcher)\nforall x (Addicted(x) and Cavalier(x) -> Void(x))\nCavalier(thatcher) and Whiskery(thatcher) -> Addicted(thatcher)\nforall x (Younger(x) and Whiskery(x) -> Cavalier(x))\n\nnot Damning(doyle)\n\ntherefore Damning(doyle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Antonie is squeamish. Antonie is overactive. Robenia is squeamish. Robenia is overactive. Robenia is backmost. Gabe is unassisted. Gabe is gangrenous. All squeamish, devotional things are bermudan. If Gabe is devotional and Gabe is gangrenous then Gabe is squeamish. Blue, gangrenous things are devotional. Gabe is devotional.", "logic": "\nSqueamish(antonie)\nOveractive(antonie)\nSqueamish(robenia)\nOveractive(robenia)\nBackmost(robenia)\nUnassisted(gabe)\nGangrenous(gabe)\nforall x (Squeamish(x) and Devotional(x) -> Bermudan(x))\nDevotional(gabe) and Gangrenous(gabe) -> Squeamish(gabe)\nforall x (Unassisted(x) and Gangrenous(x) -> Devotional(x))\n\nDevotional(gabe)\n\nUnassisted(gabe) and Gangrenous(gabe) and forall x (Unassisted(x) and Gangrenous(x) -> Devotional(x)) -> therefore Devotional(gabe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Dorelle is benthic. Dorelle is auriform. Miguela is benthic. Miguela is auriform. Miguela is irish. Geraldina is alveolar. Geraldina is modernized. All benthic, unwavering things are orbicular. If Geraldina is unwavering and Geraldina is modernized then Geraldina is benthic. Blue, modernized things are unwavering. Geraldina is not unwavering.", "logic": "\nBenthic(dorelle)\nAuriform(dorelle)\nBenthic(miguela)\nAuriform(miguela)\nIrish(miguela)\nAlveolar(geraldina)\nModernized(geraldina)\nforall x (Benthic(x) and Unwavering(x) -> Orbicular(x))\nUnwavering(geraldina) and Modernized(geraldina) -> Benthic(geraldina)\nforall x (Alveolar(x) and Modernized(x) -> Unwavering(x))\n\nnot Unwavering(geraldina)\n\nAlveolar(geraldina) and Modernized(geraldina) and forall x (Alveolar(x) and Modernized(x) -> Unwavering(x)) -> therefore Unwavering(geraldina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Sidoney is ventricose. Sidoney is conjugate. Michail is ventricose. Michail is conjugate. Michail is captious. Audie is cuspidate. Audie is archetypal. All ventricose, steadying things are impulsive. If Audie is steadying and Audie is archetypal then Audie is ventricose. Blue, archetypal things are steadying. Audie is ventricose.", "logic": "\nVentricose(sidoney)\nConjugate(sidoney)\nVentricose(michail)\nConjugate(michail)\nCaptious(michail)\nCuspidate(audie)\nArchetypal(audie)\nforall x (Ventricose(x) and Steadying(x) -> Impulsive(x))\nSteadying(audie) and Archetypal(audie) -> Ventricose(audie)\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) and Archetypal(x) -> Steadying(x))\n\nVentricose(audie)\n\nCuspidate(audie) and Archetypal(audie) and forall x (Cuspidate(x) and Archetypal(x) -> Steadying(x)) -> therefore Steadying(audie) Steadying(audie) and Archetypal(audie) and Steadying(audie) and Archetypal(audie) -> Ventricose(audie) -> therefore Ventricose(audie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Marget is expiative. Marget is swarthy. Joslyn is expiative. Joslyn is swarthy. Joslyn is outbred. Enoch is canonic. Enoch is preset. All expiative, haughty things are pubescent. If Enoch is haughty and Enoch is preset then Enoch is expiative. Blue, preset things are haughty. Enoch is not expiative.", "logic": "\nExpiative(marget)\nSwarthy(marget)\nExpiative(joslyn)\nSwarthy(joslyn)\nOutbred(joslyn)\nCanonic(enoch)\nPreset(enoch)\nforall x (Expiative(x) and Haughty(x) -> Pubescent(x))\nHaughty(enoch) and Preset(enoch) -> Expiative(enoch)\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Preset(x) -> Haughty(x))\n\nnot Expiative(enoch)\n\nCanonic(enoch) and Preset(enoch) and forall x (Canonic(x) and Preset(x) -> Haughty(x)) -> therefore Haughty(enoch) Haughty(enoch) and Preset(enoch) and Haughty(enoch) and Preset(enoch) -> Expiative(enoch) -> therefore Expiative(enoch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Karyl is palpitant. Karyl is congested. Casandra is palpitant. Casandra is congested. Casandra is coagulable. Charity is glistening. Charity is haunted. All palpitant, sanious things are cloven. If Charity is sanious and Charity is haunted then Charity is palpitant. Blue, haunted things are sanious. Charity is cloven.", "logic": "\nPalpitant(karyl)\nCongested(karyl)\nPalpitant(casandra)\nCongested(casandra)\nCoagulable(casandra)\nGlistening(charity)\nHaunted(charity)\nforall x (Palpitant(x) and Sanious(x) -> Cloven(x))\nSanious(charity) and Haunted(charity) -> Palpitant(charity)\nforall x (Glistening(x) and Haunted(x) -> Sanious(x))\n\nCloven(charity)\n\nGlistening(charity) and Haunted(charity) and forall x (Glistening(x) and Haunted(x) -> Sanious(x)) -> therefore Sanious(charity) Sanious(charity) and Haunted(charity) and Sanious(charity) and Haunted(charity) -> Palpitant(charity) -> therefore Palpitant(charity) Glistening(charity) and Haunted(charity) and forall x (Glistening(x) and Haunted(x) -> Sanious(x)) -> therefore Sanious(charity) Palpitant(charity) and Sanious(charity) and forall x (Palpitant(x) and Sanious(x) -> Cloven(x)) -> therefore Cloven(charity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Fran is autocratic. Fran is lousy. Jerrome is autocratic. Jerrome is lousy. Jerrome is daily. Horacio is praiseful. Horacio is laminal. All autocratic, bonny things are nonunion. If Horacio is bonny and Horacio is laminal then Horacio is autocratic. Blue, laminal things are bonny. Horacio is not nonunion.", "logic": "\nAutocratic(fran)\nLousy(fran)\nAutocratic(jerrome)\nLousy(jerrome)\nDaily(jerrome)\nPraiseful(horacio)\nLaminal(horacio)\nforall x (Autocratic(x) and Bonny(x) -> Nonunion(x))\nBonny(horacio) and Laminal(horacio) -> Autocratic(horacio)\nforall x (Praiseful(x) and Laminal(x) -> Bonny(x))\n\nnot Nonunion(horacio)\n\nPraiseful(horacio) and Laminal(horacio) and forall x (Praiseful(x) and Laminal(x) -> Bonny(x)) -> therefore Bonny(horacio) Bonny(horacio) and Laminal(horacio) and Bonny(horacio) and Laminal(horacio) -> Autocratic(horacio) -> therefore Autocratic(horacio) Praiseful(horacio) and Laminal(horacio) and forall x (Praiseful(x) and Laminal(x) -> Bonny(x)) -> therefore Bonny(horacio) Autocratic(horacio) and Bonny(horacio) and forall x (Autocratic(x) and Bonny(x) -> Nonunion(x)) -> therefore Nonunion(horacio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Gaylene is divided. Gaylene is lowest. Sissie is divided. Sissie is lowest. Sissie is iconic. Meredeth is recovering. Meredeth is miotic. All divided, heroical things are megalithic. If Meredeth is heroical and Meredeth is miotic then Meredeth is divided. Blue, miotic things are heroical. Sissie is not megalithic.", "logic": "\nDivided(gaylene)\nLowest(gaylene)\nDivided(sissie)\nLowest(sissie)\nIconic(sissie)\nRecovering(meredeth)\nMiotic(meredeth)\nforall x (Divided(x) and Heroical(x) -> Megalithic(x))\nHeroical(meredeth) and Miotic(meredeth) -> Divided(meredeth)\nforall x (Recovering(x) and Miotic(x) -> Heroical(x))\n\nnot Megalithic(sissie)\n\nforall x (Divided(x) and Heroical(x) -> Megalithic(x)) <- forall x (Recovering(x) and Miotic(x) -> Heroical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Mariette is jumpy. Mariette is societal. Emelina is jumpy. Emelina is societal. Emelina is glazed. Carleen is cleft. Carleen is combustive. All jumpy, paranormal things are well. If Carleen is paranormal and Carleen is combustive then Carleen is jumpy. Blue, combustive things are paranormal. Mariette is paranormal.", "logic": "\nJumpy(mariette)\nSocietal(mariette)\nJumpy(emelina)\nSocietal(emelina)\nGlazed(emelina)\nCleft(carleen)\nCombustive(carleen)\nforall x (Jumpy(x) and Paranormal(x) -> Well(x))\nParanormal(carleen) and Combustive(carleen) -> Jumpy(carleen)\nforall x (Cleft(x) and Combustive(x) -> Paranormal(x))\n\nParanormal(mariette)\n\nforall x (Cleft(x) and Combustive(x) -> Paranormal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Aigneis is permeant. Aigneis is huffy. Fyodor is permeant. Fyodor is huffy. Fyodor is polygamous. Janene is pasted. Janene is immiscible. All permeant, writhed things are warty. If Janene is writhed and Janene is immiscible then Janene is permeant. Blue, immiscible things are writhed. Aigneis is not warty.", "logic": "\nPermeant(aigneis)\nHuffy(aigneis)\nPermeant(fyodor)\nHuffy(fyodor)\nPolygamous(fyodor)\nPasted(janene)\nImmiscible(janene)\nforall x (Permeant(x) and Writhed(x) -> Warty(x))\nWrithed(janene) and Immiscible(janene) -> Permeant(janene)\nforall x (Pasted(x) and Immiscible(x) -> Writhed(x))\n\nnot Warty(aigneis)\n\nforall x (Permeant(x) and Writhed(x) -> Warty(x)) <- forall x (Pasted(x) and Immiscible(x) -> Writhed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Lilly is unwatchful. Lilly is autolytic. Raina is unwatchful. Raina is autolytic. Raina is romansh. Gasper is national. Gasper is felicitous. All unwatchful, asserting things are formal. If Gasper is asserting and Gasper is felicitous then Gasper is unwatchful. Blue, felicitous things are asserting. Raina is asserting.", "logic": "\nUnwatchful(lilly)\nAutolytic(lilly)\nUnwatchful(raina)\nAutolytic(raina)\nRomansh(raina)\nNational(gasper)\nFelicitous(gasper)\nforall x (Unwatchful(x) and Asserting(x) -> Formal(x))\nAsserting(gasper) and Felicitous(gasper) -> Unwatchful(gasper)\nforall x (National(x) and Felicitous(x) -> Asserting(x))\n\nAsserting(raina)\n\nforall x (National(x) and Felicitous(x) -> Asserting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Jake is holistic. Jake is backstair. Stanford is holistic. Stanford is backstair. Stanford is vulpine. Tremaine is technical. Tremaine is funny. All holistic, subject things are courtly. If Tremaine is subject and Tremaine is funny then Tremaine is holistic. Blue, funny things are subject. Jake is not technical.", "logic": "\nHolistic(jake)\nBackstair(jake)\nHolistic(stanford)\nBackstair(stanford)\nVulpine(stanford)\nTechnical(tremaine)\nFunny(tremaine)\nforall x (Holistic(x) and Subject(x) -> Courtly(x))\nSubject(tremaine) and Funny(tremaine) -> Holistic(tremaine)\nforall x (Technical(x) and Funny(x) -> Subject(x))\n\nnot Technical(jake)\n\nnot Technical(jake) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Randy is unsalaried. Randy is main. Jesselyn is unsalaried. Jesselyn is main. Jesselyn is wispy. Shirlene is answerable. Shirlene is bivariate. All unsalaried, lymphoid things are bacteroid. If Shirlene is lymphoid and Shirlene is bivariate then Shirlene is unsalaried. Blue, bivariate things are lymphoid. Shirlene is main.", "logic": "\nUnsalaried(randy)\nMain(randy)\nUnsalaried(jesselyn)\nMain(jesselyn)\nWispy(jesselyn)\nAnswerable(shirlene)\nBivariate(shirlene)\nforall x (Unsalaried(x) and Lymphoid(x) -> Bacteroid(x))\nLymphoid(shirlene) and Bivariate(shirlene) -> Unsalaried(shirlene)\nforall x (Answerable(x) and Bivariate(x) -> Lymphoid(x))\n\nMain(shirlene)\n\nMain(shirlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Phil is haemolytic. Phil is scurrying. Davey is haemolytic. Davey is scurrying. Davey is lamented. Caitrin is nonpublic. Caitrin is choragic. All haemolytic, indecorous things are outbound. If Caitrin is indecorous and Caitrin is choragic then Caitrin is haemolytic. Blue, choragic things are indecorous. Caitrin is not lamented.", "logic": "\nHaemolytic(phil)\nScurrying(phil)\nHaemolytic(davey)\nScurrying(davey)\nLamented(davey)\nNonpublic(caitrin)\nChoragic(caitrin)\nforall x (Haemolytic(x) and Indecorous(x) -> Outbound(x))\nIndecorous(caitrin) and Choragic(caitrin) -> Haemolytic(caitrin)\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) and Choragic(x) -> Indecorous(x))\n\nnot Lamented(caitrin)\n\nnot Lamented(caitrin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Kai is yellowed. Kai is snowbound. Maynord is yellowed. Maynord is snowbound. Maynord is keynesian. Clovis is drooping. Clovis is smoking. All yellowed, sibylline things are monogynous. If Clovis is sibylline and Clovis is smoking then Clovis is yellowed. Blue, smoking things are sibylline. Kai is keynesian.", "logic": "\nYellowed(kai)\nSnowbound(kai)\nYellowed(maynord)\nSnowbound(maynord)\nKeynesian(maynord)\nDrooping(clovis)\nSmoking(clovis)\nforall x (Yellowed(x) and Sibylline(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nSibylline(clovis) and Smoking(clovis) -> Yellowed(clovis)\nforall x (Drooping(x) and Smoking(x) -> Sibylline(x))\n\nKeynesian(kai)\n\nKeynesian(kai) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1698"} {"premises": "Sherlocke is haunted. Sherlocke is jamesian. Sherlocke is stone. If something is rapid and jamesian then it is stone. If Sherlocke is haunted then Sherlocke is jamesian. All jamesian, rapid things are stone. All stone, dimmed things are hermitical. If Sherlocke is jamesian then Sherlocke is dimmed. All jamesian, rapid things are stone. Sherlocke is jamesian.", "logic": "\nHaunted(sherlocke)\nJamesian(sherlocke)\nStone(sherlocke)\nforall x (Rapid(x) and Jamesian(x) -> Stone(x))\nHaunted(sherlocke) -> Jamesian(sherlocke)\nforall x (Jamesian(x) and Rapid(x) -> Stone(x))\nforall x (Stone(x) and Dimmed(x) -> Hermitical(x))\nJamesian(sherlocke) -> Dimmed(sherlocke)\nforall x (Jamesian(x) and Rapid(x) -> Stone(x))\n\nJamesian(sherlocke)\n\ntherefore Jamesian(sherlocke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2263"} {"premises": "Fran is unexcused. Fran is unfit. Fran is robustious. If something is unaffected and unfit then it is robustious. If Fran is unexcused then Fran is unfit. All unfit, unaffected things are robustious. All robustious, foolish things are balky. If Fran is unfit then Fran is foolish. All unfit, unaffected things are robustious. Fran is not unexcused.", "logic": "\nUnexcused(fran)\nUnfit(fran)\nRobustious(fran)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and Unfit(x) -> Robustious(x))\nUnexcused(fran) -> Unfit(fran)\nforall x (Unfit(x) and Unaffected(x) -> Robustious(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and Foolish(x) -> Balky(x))\nUnfit(fran) -> Foolish(fran)\nforall x (Unfit(x) and Unaffected(x) -> Robustious(x))\n\nnot Unexcused(fran)\n\ntherefore Unexcused(fran)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2263"} {"premises": "Sissy is tiddly. Sissy is lobar. Sissy is patient. If something is tameable and lobar then it is patient. If Sissy is tiddly then Sissy is lobar. All lobar, tameable things are patient. All patient, geothermic things are unwomanly. If Sissy is lobar then Sissy is geothermic. All lobar, tameable things are patient. Sissy is geothermic.", "logic": "\nTiddly(sissy)\nLobar(sissy)\nPatient(sissy)\nforall x (Tameable(x) and Lobar(x) -> Patient(x))\nTiddly(sissy) -> Lobar(sissy)\nforall x (Lobar(x) and Tameable(x) -> Patient(x))\nforall x (Patient(x) and Geothermic(x) -> Unwomanly(x))\nLobar(sissy) -> Geothermic(sissy)\nforall x (Lobar(x) and Tameable(x) -> Patient(x))\n\nGeothermic(sissy)\n\nLobar(sissy) and Lobar(sissy) -> Geothermic(sissy) -> therefore Geothermic(sissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2263"} {"premises": "Ignace is cliched. Ignace is electoral. Ignace is cool. If something is fated and electoral then it is cool. If Ignace is cliched then Ignace is electoral. All electoral, fated things are cool. All cool, pitiless things are corded. If Ignace is electoral then Ignace is pitiless. All electoral, fated things are cool. Ignace is not pitiless.", "logic": "\nCliched(ignace)\nElectoral(ignace)\nCool(ignace)\nforall x (Fated(x) and Electoral(x) -> Cool(x))\nCliched(ignace) -> Electoral(ignace)\nforall x (Electoral(x) and Fated(x) -> Cool(x))\nforall x (Cool(x) and Pitiless(x) -> Corded(x))\nElectoral(ignace) -> Pitiless(ignace)\nforall x (Electoral(x) and Fated(x) -> Cool(x))\n\nnot Pitiless(ignace)\n\nElectoral(ignace) and Electoral(ignace) -> Pitiless(ignace) -> therefore Pitiless(ignace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2263"} {"premises": "Josie is geologic. Josie is nonracist. Josie is porous. If something is monandrous and nonracist then it is porous. If Josie is geologic then Josie is nonracist. All nonracist, monandrous things are porous. All porous, hollywood things are bragging. If Josie is nonracist then Josie is hollywood. All nonracist, monandrous things are porous. Josie is not monandrous.", "logic": "\nGeologic(josie)\nNonracist(josie)\nPorous(josie)\nforall x (Monandrous(x) and Nonracist(x) -> Porous(x))\nGeologic(josie) -> Nonracist(josie)\nforall x (Nonracist(x) and Monandrous(x) -> Porous(x))\nforall x (Porous(x) and Hollywood(x) -> Bragging(x))\nNonracist(josie) -> Hollywood(josie)\nforall x (Nonracist(x) and Monandrous(x) -> Porous(x))\n\nnot Monandrous(josie)\n\nnot Monandrous(josie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2263"} {"premises": "Myke is piggy. Myke is axile. Myke is camphoric. If something is clouded and axile then it is camphoric. If Myke is piggy then Myke is axile. All axile, clouded things are camphoric. All camphoric, malevolent things are adjectival. If Myke is axile then Myke is malevolent. All axile, clouded things are camphoric. Myke is furry.", "logic": "\nPiggy(myke)\nAxile(myke)\nCamphoric(myke)\nforall x (Clouded(x) and Axile(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nPiggy(myke) -> Axile(myke)\nforall x (Axile(x) and Clouded(x) -> Camphoric(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) and Malevolent(x) -> Adjectival(x))\nAxile(myke) -> Malevolent(myke)\nforall x (Axile(x) and Clouded(x) -> Camphoric(x))\n\nFurry(myke)\n\nFurry(myke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2263"} {"premises": "The ethelin is climactic. The ethelin is taciturn. The ethelin occult the alden. The ethelin occult the chet. The ethelin fabricate the alden. The ethelin fabricate the chet. The alden is vapourish. The alden is not tubeless. The alden is climactic. The alden is taciturn. The alden occult the ethelin. The alden fabricate the ethelin. The alden fabricate the chet. The chet discharge the ethelin. The chet is mushy. The chet fabricate the alden. If someone fabricate the chet and they eat the alden then they need the ethelin. If the alden discharge the ethelin then the ethelin is mushy. If someone fabricate the alden and the alden is tubeless then the alden discharge the chet. If someone is tubeless then they eat the ethelin. If someone occult the alden then they eat the ethelin. If someone fabricate the chet then the chet discharge the alden. The alden is taciturn.", "logic": "\nClimactic(ethelin)\nTaciturn(ethelin)\nOccult(ethelin, alden)\nOccult(ethelin, chet)\nFabricate(ethelin, alden)\nFabricate(ethelin, chet)\nVapourish(alden)\nnot Tubeless(alden)\nClimactic(alden)\nTaciturn(alden)\nOccult(alden, ethelin)\nFabricate(alden, ethelin)\nFabricate(alden, chet)\nDischarge(chet, ethelin)\nMushy(chet)\nFabricate(chet, alden)\nforall x (Fabricate(x, chet) and Discharge(x, alden) -> Occult(x, ethelin))\nDischarge(alden, ethelin) -> Mushy(ethelin)\nforall x (Fabricate(x, alden) and Tubeless(alden) -> Discharge(alden, chet))\nforall x (Tubeless(x) -> Discharge(x, ethelin))\nforall x (Occult(x, alden) -> Discharge(x, ethelin))\nforall x (Fabricate(x, chet) -> Discharge(chet, alden))\n\nTaciturn(alden)\n\ntherefore Taciturn(alden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1490"} {"premises": "The clovis is sorrowing. The clovis is enlivening. The clovis dissolve the aliza. The clovis dissolve the desaree. The clovis intermix the aliza. The clovis intermix the desaree. The aliza is godly. The aliza is not villainous. The aliza is sorrowing. The aliza is enlivening. The aliza dissolve the clovis. The aliza intermix the clovis. The aliza intermix the desaree. The desaree reimburse the clovis. The desaree is taut. The desaree intermix the aliza. If someone intermix the desaree and they eat the aliza then they need the clovis. If the aliza reimburse the clovis then the clovis is taut. If someone intermix the aliza and the aliza is villainous then the aliza reimburse the desaree. If someone is villainous then they eat the clovis. If someone dissolve the aliza then they eat the clovis. If someone intermix the desaree then the desaree reimburse the aliza. The clovis does not need the aliza.", "logic": "\nSorrowing(clovis)\nEnlivening(clovis)\nDissolve(clovis, aliza)\nDissolve(clovis, desaree)\nIntermix(clovis, aliza)\nIntermix(clovis, desaree)\nGodly(aliza)\nnot Villainous(aliza)\nSorrowing(aliza)\nEnlivening(aliza)\nDissolve(aliza, clovis)\nIntermix(aliza, clovis)\nIntermix(aliza, desaree)\nReimburse(desaree, clovis)\nTaut(desaree)\nIntermix(desaree, aliza)\nforall x (Intermix(x, desaree) and Reimburse(x, aliza) -> Dissolve(x, clovis))\nReimburse(aliza, clovis) -> Taut(clovis)\nforall x (Intermix(x, aliza) and Villainous(aliza) -> Reimburse(aliza, desaree))\nforall x (Villainous(x) -> Reimburse(x, clovis))\nforall x (Dissolve(x, aliza) -> Reimburse(x, clovis))\nforall x (Intermix(x, desaree) -> Reimburse(desaree, aliza))\n\nnot Dissolve(clovis, aliza)\n\ntherefore Dissolve(clovis, aliza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1490"} {"premises": "The rodney is argentine. The rodney is spotted. The rodney dwindle the waine. The rodney dwindle the vladimir. The rodney embolden the waine. The rodney embolden the vladimir. The waine is fulminant. The waine is not topnotch. The waine is argentine. The waine is spotted. The waine dwindle the rodney. The waine embolden the rodney. The waine embolden the vladimir. The vladimir recuse the rodney. The vladimir is buckram. The vladimir embolden the waine. If someone embolden the vladimir and they eat the waine then they need the rodney. If the waine recuse the rodney then the rodney is buckram. If someone embolden the waine and the waine is topnotch then the waine recuse the vladimir. If someone is topnotch then they eat the rodney. If someone dwindle the waine then they eat the rodney. If someone embolden the vladimir then the vladimir recuse the waine. The waine does not eat the rodney.", "logic": "\nArgentine(rodney)\nSpotted(rodney)\nDwindle(rodney, waine)\nDwindle(rodney, vladimir)\nEmbolden(rodney, waine)\nEmbolden(rodney, vladimir)\nFulminant(waine)\nnot Topnotch(waine)\nArgentine(waine)\nSpotted(waine)\nDwindle(waine, rodney)\nEmbolden(waine, rodney)\nEmbolden(waine, vladimir)\nRecuse(vladimir, rodney)\nBuckram(vladimir)\nEmbolden(vladimir, waine)\nforall x (Embolden(x, vladimir) and Recuse(x, waine) -> Dwindle(x, rodney))\nRecuse(waine, rodney) -> Buckram(rodney)\nforall x (Embolden(x, waine) and Topnotch(waine) -> Recuse(waine, vladimir))\nforall x (Topnotch(x) -> Recuse(x, rodney))\nforall x (Dwindle(x, waine) -> Recuse(x, rodney))\nforall x (Embolden(x, vladimir) -> Recuse(vladimir, waine))\n\nnot Recuse(waine, rodney)\n\nforall x (Topnotch(x) -> Recuse(x, rodney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1490"} {"premises": "The alisha is killing. The alisha is phyletic. The alisha ensky the stirling. The alisha ensky the sherie. The alisha overjoy the stirling. The alisha overjoy the sherie. The stirling is reasonless. The stirling is not euphoric. The stirling is killing. The stirling is phyletic. The stirling ensky the alisha. The stirling overjoy the alisha. The stirling overjoy the sherie. The sherie till the alisha. The sherie is aleutian. The sherie overjoy the stirling. If someone overjoy the sherie and they eat the stirling then they need the alisha. If the stirling till the alisha then the alisha is aleutian. If someone overjoy the stirling and the stirling is euphoric then the stirling till the sherie. If someone is euphoric then they eat the alisha. If someone ensky the stirling then they eat the alisha. If someone overjoy the sherie then the sherie till the stirling. The stirling is aleutian.", "logic": "\nKilling(alisha)\nPhyletic(alisha)\nEnsky(alisha, stirling)\nEnsky(alisha, sherie)\nOverjoy(alisha, stirling)\nOverjoy(alisha, sherie)\nReasonless(stirling)\nnot Euphoric(stirling)\nKilling(stirling)\nPhyletic(stirling)\nEnsky(stirling, alisha)\nOverjoy(stirling, alisha)\nOverjoy(stirling, sherie)\nTill(sherie, alisha)\nAleutian(sherie)\nOverjoy(sherie, stirling)\nforall x (Overjoy(x, sherie) and Till(x, stirling) -> Ensky(x, alisha))\nTill(stirling, alisha) -> Aleutian(alisha)\nforall x (Overjoy(x, stirling) and Euphoric(stirling) -> Till(stirling, sherie))\nforall x (Euphoric(x) -> Till(x, alisha))\nforall x (Ensky(x, stirling) -> Till(x, alisha))\nforall x (Overjoy(x, sherie) -> Till(sherie, stirling))\n\nAleutian(stirling)\n\nAleutian(stirling) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1490"} {"premises": "Leonie is not reachable. Leonie is puissant. Leonie is yuman. Leonie is sable. Ofella is not reachable. Ofella is puissant. Ofella is yuman. Cold, broadside things are unsalable. If Ofella is yuman and Ofella is sable then Ofella is unsalable. If something is diaphysial then it is sable. Nice things are sable. If something is diaphysial and not broadside then it is not yuman. If Ofella is not reachable then Ofella is diaphysial. Ofella is yuman.", "logic": "\nnot Reachable(leonie)\nPuissant(leonie)\nYuman(leonie)\nSable(leonie)\nnot Reachable(ofella)\nPuissant(ofella)\nYuman(ofella)\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) and Broadside(x) -> Unsalable(x))\nYuman(ofella) and Sable(ofella) -> Unsalable(ofella)\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) -> Sable(x))\nforall x (Broadside(x) -> Sable(x))\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) and not Broadside(x) -> not Yuman(x))\nnot Reachable(ofella) -> Diaphysial(ofella)\n\nYuman(ofella)\n\ntherefore Yuman(ofella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Wrennie is not clonal. Wrennie is immiscible. Wrennie is probatory. Wrennie is christlike. Prisca is not clonal. Prisca is immiscible. Prisca is probatory. Cold, wrenching things are peckish. If Prisca is probatory and Prisca is christlike then Prisca is peckish. If something is deserted then it is christlike. Nice things are christlike. If something is deserted and not wrenching then it is not probatory. If Prisca is not clonal then Prisca is deserted. Prisca is not immiscible.", "logic": "\nnot Clonal(wrennie)\nImmiscible(wrennie)\nProbatory(wrennie)\nChristlike(wrennie)\nnot Clonal(prisca)\nImmiscible(prisca)\nProbatory(prisca)\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Wrenching(x) -> Peckish(x))\nProbatory(prisca) and Christlike(prisca) -> Peckish(prisca)\nforall x (Deserted(x) -> Christlike(x))\nforall x (Wrenching(x) -> Christlike(x))\nforall x (Deserted(x) and not Wrenching(x) -> not Probatory(x))\nnot Clonal(prisca) -> Deserted(prisca)\n\nnot Immiscible(prisca)\n\ntherefore Immiscible(prisca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Odille is not anaglyphic. Odille is redemptory. Odille is criminal. Odille is beige. Sim is not anaglyphic. Sim is redemptory. Sim is criminal. Cold, indicative things are piebald. If Sim is criminal and Sim is beige then Sim is piebald. If something is changeless then it is beige. Nice things are beige. If something is changeless and not indicative then it is not criminal. If Sim is not anaglyphic then Sim is changeless. Sim is changeless.", "logic": "\nnot Anaglyphic(odille)\nRedemptory(odille)\nCriminal(odille)\nBeige(odille)\nnot Anaglyphic(sim)\nRedemptory(sim)\nCriminal(sim)\nforall x (Changeless(x) and Indicative(x) -> Piebald(x))\nCriminal(sim) and Beige(sim) -> Piebald(sim)\nforall x (Changeless(x) -> Beige(x))\nforall x (Indicative(x) -> Beige(x))\nforall x (Changeless(x) and not Indicative(x) -> not Criminal(x))\nnot Anaglyphic(sim) -> Changeless(sim)\n\nChangeless(sim)\n\nnot Anaglyphic(sim) and not Anaglyphic(sim) -> Changeless(sim) -> therefore Changeless(sim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Dean is not antlered. Dean is unlicenced. Dean is unforced. Dean is dioecian. Marlo is not antlered. Marlo is unlicenced. Marlo is unforced. Cold, altricial things are immaculate. If Marlo is unforced and Marlo is dioecian then Marlo is immaculate. If something is ticklish then it is dioecian. Nice things are dioecian. If something is ticklish and not altricial then it is not unforced. If Marlo is not antlered then Marlo is ticklish. Marlo is not ticklish.", "logic": "\nnot Antlered(dean)\nUnlicenced(dean)\nUnforced(dean)\nDioecian(dean)\nnot Antlered(marlo)\nUnlicenced(marlo)\nUnforced(marlo)\nforall x (Ticklish(x) and Altricial(x) -> Immaculate(x))\nUnforced(marlo) and Dioecian(marlo) -> Immaculate(marlo)\nforall x (Ticklish(x) -> Dioecian(x))\nforall x (Altricial(x) -> Dioecian(x))\nforall x (Ticklish(x) and not Altricial(x) -> not Unforced(x))\nnot Antlered(marlo) -> Ticklish(marlo)\n\nnot Ticklish(marlo)\n\nnot Antlered(marlo) and not Antlered(marlo) -> Ticklish(marlo) -> therefore Ticklish(marlo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Trescha is not fallible. Trescha is equal. Trescha is adequate. Trescha is bifilar. Sybil is not fallible. Sybil is equal. Sybil is adequate. Cold, ionized things are unspoken. If Sybil is adequate and Sybil is bifilar then Sybil is unspoken. If something is pouchlike then it is bifilar. Nice things are bifilar. If something is pouchlike and not ionized then it is not adequate. If Sybil is not fallible then Sybil is pouchlike. Sybil is bifilar.", "logic": "\nnot Fallible(trescha)\nEqual(trescha)\nAdequate(trescha)\nBifilar(trescha)\nnot Fallible(sybil)\nEqual(sybil)\nAdequate(sybil)\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) and Ionized(x) -> Unspoken(x))\nAdequate(sybil) and Bifilar(sybil) -> Unspoken(sybil)\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) -> Bifilar(x))\nforall x (Ionized(x) -> Bifilar(x))\nforall x (Pouchlike(x) and not Ionized(x) -> not Adequate(x))\nnot Fallible(sybil) -> Pouchlike(sybil)\n\nBifilar(sybil)\n\nnot Fallible(sybil) and not Fallible(sybil) -> Pouchlike(sybil) -> therefore Pouchlike(sybil) Pouchlike(sybil) and forall x (Pouchlike(x) -> Bifilar(x)) -> therefore Bifilar(sybil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Eimile is not webbed. Eimile is gluey. Eimile is jerking. Eimile is roughdried. Elyn is not webbed. Elyn is gluey. Elyn is jerking. Cold, bonkers things are sapphire. If Elyn is jerking and Elyn is roughdried then Elyn is sapphire. If something is ladylike then it is roughdried. Nice things are roughdried. If something is ladylike and not bonkers then it is not jerking. If Elyn is not webbed then Elyn is ladylike. Elyn is not roughdried.", "logic": "\nnot Webbed(eimile)\nGluey(eimile)\nJerking(eimile)\nRoughdried(eimile)\nnot Webbed(elyn)\nGluey(elyn)\nJerking(elyn)\nforall x (Ladylike(x) and Bonkers(x) -> Sapphire(x))\nJerking(elyn) and Roughdried(elyn) -> Sapphire(elyn)\nforall x (Ladylike(x) -> Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Ladylike(x) and not Bonkers(x) -> not Jerking(x))\nnot Webbed(elyn) -> Ladylike(elyn)\n\nnot Roughdried(elyn)\n\nnot Webbed(elyn) and not Webbed(elyn) -> Ladylike(elyn) -> therefore Ladylike(elyn) Ladylike(elyn) and forall x (Ladylike(x) -> Roughdried(x)) -> therefore Roughdried(elyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Britani is not veined. Britani is veritable. Britani is affine. Britani is anxiolytic. Beatrix is not veined. Beatrix is veritable. Beatrix is affine. Cold, siamese things are wheelless. If Beatrix is affine and Beatrix is anxiolytic then Beatrix is wheelless. If something is testicular then it is anxiolytic. Nice things are anxiolytic. If something is testicular and not siamese then it is not affine. If Beatrix is not veined then Beatrix is testicular. Beatrix is wheelless.", "logic": "\nnot Veined(britani)\nVeritable(britani)\nAffine(britani)\nAnxiolytic(britani)\nnot Veined(beatrix)\nVeritable(beatrix)\nAffine(beatrix)\nforall x (Testicular(x) and Siamese(x) -> Wheelless(x))\nAffine(beatrix) and Anxiolytic(beatrix) -> Wheelless(beatrix)\nforall x (Testicular(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Siamese(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Testicular(x) and not Siamese(x) -> not Affine(x))\nnot Veined(beatrix) -> Testicular(beatrix)\n\nWheelless(beatrix)\n\nnot Veined(beatrix) and not Veined(beatrix) -> Testicular(beatrix) -> therefore Testicular(beatrix) Testicular(beatrix) and forall x (Testicular(x) -> Anxiolytic(x)) -> therefore Anxiolytic(beatrix) Affine(beatrix) and Anxiolytic(beatrix) and Affine(beatrix) and Anxiolytic(beatrix) -> Wheelless(beatrix) -> therefore Wheelless(beatrix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Tove is not upraised. Tove is unwelcome. Tove is lewd. Tove is upbound. Jillane is not upraised. Jillane is unwelcome. Jillane is lewd. Cold, outback things are shorn. If Jillane is lewd and Jillane is upbound then Jillane is shorn. If something is curving then it is upbound. Nice things are upbound. If something is curving and not outback then it is not lewd. If Jillane is not upraised then Jillane is curving. Jillane is not shorn.", "logic": "\nnot Upraised(tove)\nUnwelcome(tove)\nLewd(tove)\nUpbound(tove)\nnot Upraised(jillane)\nUnwelcome(jillane)\nLewd(jillane)\nforall x (Curving(x) and Outback(x) -> Shorn(x))\nLewd(jillane) and Upbound(jillane) -> Shorn(jillane)\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Outback(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) and not Outback(x) -> not Lewd(x))\nnot Upraised(jillane) -> Curving(jillane)\n\nnot Shorn(jillane)\n\nnot Upraised(jillane) and not Upraised(jillane) -> Curving(jillane) -> therefore Curving(jillane) Curving(jillane) and forall x (Curving(x) -> Upbound(x)) -> therefore Upbound(jillane) Lewd(jillane) and Upbound(jillane) and Lewd(jillane) and Upbound(jillane) -> Shorn(jillane) -> therefore Shorn(jillane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Rudolph is not myopic. Rudolph is costly. Rudolph is recyclable. Rudolph is actuarial. Kirsti is not myopic. Kirsti is costly. Kirsti is recyclable. Cold, attacking things are unredeemed. If Kirsti is recyclable and Kirsti is actuarial then Kirsti is unredeemed. If something is amitotic then it is actuarial. Nice things are actuarial. If something is amitotic and not attacking then it is not recyclable. If Kirsti is not myopic then Kirsti is amitotic. Rudolph is not unredeemed.", "logic": "\nnot Myopic(rudolph)\nCostly(rudolph)\nRecyclable(rudolph)\nActuarial(rudolph)\nnot Myopic(kirsti)\nCostly(kirsti)\nRecyclable(kirsti)\nforall x (Amitotic(x) and Attacking(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nRecyclable(kirsti) and Actuarial(kirsti) -> Unredeemed(kirsti)\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Actuarial(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) -> Actuarial(x))\nforall x (Amitotic(x) and not Attacking(x) -> not Recyclable(x))\nnot Myopic(kirsti) -> Amitotic(kirsti)\n\nnot Unredeemed(rudolph)\n\nforall x (Amitotic(x) and Attacking(x) -> Unredeemed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Emmalyn is not soggy. Emmalyn is stepwise. Emmalyn is monistic. Emmalyn is ototoxic. Lettie is not soggy. Lettie is stepwise. Lettie is monistic. Cold, saddled things are cedarn. If Lettie is monistic and Lettie is ototoxic then Lettie is cedarn. If something is tamed then it is ototoxic. Nice things are ototoxic. If something is tamed and not saddled then it is not monistic. If Lettie is not soggy then Lettie is tamed. Emmalyn is saddled.", "logic": "\nnot Soggy(emmalyn)\nStepwise(emmalyn)\nMonistic(emmalyn)\nOtotoxic(emmalyn)\nnot Soggy(lettie)\nStepwise(lettie)\nMonistic(lettie)\nforall x (Tamed(x) and Saddled(x) -> Cedarn(x))\nMonistic(lettie) and Ototoxic(lettie) -> Cedarn(lettie)\nforall x (Tamed(x) -> Ototoxic(x))\nforall x (Saddled(x) -> Ototoxic(x))\nforall x (Tamed(x) and not Saddled(x) -> not Monistic(x))\nnot Soggy(lettie) -> Tamed(lettie)\n\nSaddled(emmalyn)\n\nSaddled(emmalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Miguela is not gauntleted. Miguela is watered. Miguela is laid. Miguela is barbaric. Lora is not gauntleted. Lora is watered. Lora is laid. Cold, prenominal things are mulish. If Lora is laid and Lora is barbaric then Lora is mulish. If something is tunisian then it is barbaric. Nice things are barbaric. If something is tunisian and not prenominal then it is not laid. If Lora is not gauntleted then Lora is tunisian. Miguela is not tunisian.", "logic": "\nnot Gauntleted(miguela)\nWatered(miguela)\nLaid(miguela)\nBarbaric(miguela)\nnot Gauntleted(lora)\nWatered(lora)\nLaid(lora)\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Mulish(x))\nLaid(lora) and Barbaric(lora) -> Mulish(lora)\nforall x (Tunisian(x) -> Barbaric(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Barbaric(x))\nforall x (Tunisian(x) and not Prenominal(x) -> not Laid(x))\nnot Gauntleted(lora) -> Tunisian(lora)\n\nnot Tunisian(miguela)\n\nnot Tunisian(miguela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "Damian is not squatty. Damian is unabridged. Damian is bladelike. Damian is weary. Hettie is not squatty. Hettie is unabridged. Hettie is bladelike. Cold, humiliated things are freehanded. If Hettie is bladelike and Hettie is weary then Hettie is freehanded. If something is unmade then it is weary. Nice things are weary. If something is unmade and not humiliated then it is not bladelike. If Hettie is not squatty then Hettie is unmade. Hettie is humiliated.", "logic": "\nnot Squatty(damian)\nUnabridged(damian)\nBladelike(damian)\nWeary(damian)\nnot Squatty(hettie)\nUnabridged(hettie)\nBladelike(hettie)\nforall x (Unmade(x) and Humiliated(x) -> Freehanded(x))\nBladelike(hettie) and Weary(hettie) -> Freehanded(hettie)\nforall x (Unmade(x) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Humiliated(x) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Unmade(x) and not Humiliated(x) -> not Bladelike(x))\nnot Squatty(hettie) -> Unmade(hettie)\n\nHumiliated(hettie)\n\nHumiliated(hettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-364"} {"premises": "The vicky is transitive. The vicky handcolor the carolan. The vicky vacation the carolan. The ashby waddle the vicky. The ashby waddle the neville. The ashby is traumatic. The ashby is svelte. The ashby vacation the vicky. The neville waddle the ashby. The neville handcolor the vicky. The neville handcolor the carolan. The carolan is genovese. The carolan is svelte. The carolan handcolor the vicky. The carolan handcolor the neville. If something is svelte and it waddle the ashby then the ashby is traumatic. If the vicky is svelte and the vicky handcolor the ashby then the vicky waddle the neville. If something is transitive then it handcolor the vicky. If something is traumatic then it waddle the neville. If something is svelte and it vacation the ashby then the ashby waddle the carolan. If something vacation the carolan and it handcolor the vicky then the carolan is traumatic. The vicky handcolor the carolan.", "logic": "\nTransitive(vicky)\nHandcolor(vicky, carolan)\nVacation(vicky, carolan)\nWaddle(ashby, vicky)\nWaddle(ashby, neville)\nTraumatic(ashby)\nSvelte(ashby)\nVacation(ashby, vicky)\nWaddle(neville, ashby)\nHandcolor(neville, vicky)\nHandcolor(neville, carolan)\nGenovese(carolan)\nSvelte(carolan)\nHandcolor(carolan, vicky)\nHandcolor(carolan, neville)\nforall x (Svelte(x) and Waddle(x, ashby) -> Traumatic(ashby))\nSvelte(vicky) and Handcolor(vicky, ashby) -> Waddle(vicky, neville)\nforall x (Transitive(x) -> Handcolor(x, vicky))\nforall x (Traumatic(x) -> Waddle(x, neville))\nforall x (Svelte(x) and Vacation(x, ashby) -> Waddle(ashby, carolan))\nforall x (Vacation(x, carolan) and Handcolor(x, vicky) -> Traumatic(carolan))\n\nHandcolor(vicky, carolan)\n\ntherefore Handcolor(vicky, carolan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The fiorenze is fleeceable. The fiorenze shoot the ofelia. The fiorenze condition the ofelia. The rubi abuse the fiorenze. The rubi abuse the darwin. The rubi is bailable. The rubi is scots. The rubi condition the fiorenze. The darwin abuse the rubi. The darwin shoot the fiorenze. The darwin shoot the ofelia. The ofelia is tragical. The ofelia is scots. The ofelia shoot the fiorenze. The ofelia shoot the darwin. If something is scots and it abuse the rubi then the rubi is bailable. If the fiorenze is scots and the fiorenze shoot the rubi then the fiorenze abuse the darwin. If something is fleeceable then it shoot the fiorenze. If something is bailable then it abuse the darwin. If something is scots and it condition the rubi then the rubi abuse the ofelia. If something condition the ofelia and it shoot the fiorenze then the ofelia is bailable. The rubi does not eat the fiorenze.", "logic": "\nFleeceable(fiorenze)\nShoot(fiorenze, ofelia)\nCondition(fiorenze, ofelia)\nAbuse(rubi, fiorenze)\nAbuse(rubi, darwin)\nBailable(rubi)\nScots(rubi)\nCondition(rubi, fiorenze)\nAbuse(darwin, rubi)\nShoot(darwin, fiorenze)\nShoot(darwin, ofelia)\nTragical(ofelia)\nScots(ofelia)\nShoot(ofelia, fiorenze)\nShoot(ofelia, darwin)\nforall x (Scots(x) and Abuse(x, rubi) -> Bailable(rubi))\nScots(fiorenze) and Shoot(fiorenze, rubi) -> Abuse(fiorenze, darwin)\nforall x (Fleeceable(x) -> Shoot(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Bailable(x) -> Abuse(x, darwin))\nforall x (Scots(x) and Condition(x, rubi) -> Abuse(rubi, ofelia))\nforall x (Condition(x, ofelia) and Shoot(x, fiorenze) -> Bailable(ofelia))\n\nnot Abuse(rubi, fiorenze)\n\ntherefore Abuse(rubi, fiorenze)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The lulu is crushed. The lulu dissociate the lynn. The lulu pretend the lynn. The erika blush the lulu. The erika blush the nathalia. The erika is velar. The erika is semiotical. The erika pretend the lulu. The nathalia blush the erika. The nathalia dissociate the lulu. The nathalia dissociate the lynn. The lynn is renewed. The lynn is semiotical. The lynn dissociate the lulu. The lynn dissociate the nathalia. If something is semiotical and it blush the erika then the erika is velar. If the lulu is semiotical and the lulu dissociate the erika then the lulu blush the nathalia. If something is crushed then it dissociate the lulu. If something is velar then it blush the nathalia. If something is semiotical and it pretend the erika then the erika blush the lynn. If something pretend the lynn and it dissociate the lulu then the lynn is velar. The lulu dissociate the lulu.", "logic": "\nCrushed(lulu)\nDissociate(lulu, lynn)\nPretend(lulu, lynn)\nBlush(erika, lulu)\nBlush(erika, nathalia)\nVelar(erika)\nSemiotical(erika)\nPretend(erika, lulu)\nBlush(nathalia, erika)\nDissociate(nathalia, lulu)\nDissociate(nathalia, lynn)\nRenewed(lynn)\nSemiotical(lynn)\nDissociate(lynn, lulu)\nDissociate(lynn, nathalia)\nforall x (Semiotical(x) and Blush(x, erika) -> Velar(erika))\nSemiotical(lulu) and Dissociate(lulu, erika) -> Blush(lulu, nathalia)\nforall x (Crushed(x) -> Dissociate(x, lulu))\nforall x (Velar(x) -> Blush(x, nathalia))\nforall x (Semiotical(x) and Pretend(x, erika) -> Blush(erika, lynn))\nforall x (Pretend(x, lynn) and Dissociate(x, lulu) -> Velar(lynn))\n\nDissociate(lulu, lulu)\n\nCrushed(lulu) and forall x (Crushed(x) -> Dissociate(x, lulu)) -> therefore Dissociate(lulu, lulu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The gisella is bicolored. The gisella reforge the datha. The gisella disturb the datha. The isaak casket the gisella. The isaak casket the nadia. The isaak is hysterical. The isaak is motley. The isaak disturb the gisella. The nadia casket the isaak. The nadia reforge the gisella. The nadia reforge the datha. The datha is homocyclic. The datha is motley. The datha reforge the gisella. The datha reforge the nadia. If something is motley and it casket the isaak then the isaak is hysterical. If the gisella is motley and the gisella reforge the isaak then the gisella casket the nadia. If something is bicolored then it reforge the gisella. If something is hysterical then it casket the nadia. If something is motley and it disturb the isaak then the isaak casket the datha. If something disturb the datha and it reforge the gisella then the datha is hysterical. The gisella does not like the gisella.", "logic": "\nBicolored(gisella)\nReforge(gisella, datha)\nDisturb(gisella, datha)\nCasket(isaak, gisella)\nCasket(isaak, nadia)\nHysterical(isaak)\nMotley(isaak)\nDisturb(isaak, gisella)\nCasket(nadia, isaak)\nReforge(nadia, gisella)\nReforge(nadia, datha)\nHomocyclic(datha)\nMotley(datha)\nReforge(datha, gisella)\nReforge(datha, nadia)\nforall x (Motley(x) and Casket(x, isaak) -> Hysterical(isaak))\nMotley(gisella) and Reforge(gisella, isaak) -> Casket(gisella, nadia)\nforall x (Bicolored(x) -> Reforge(x, gisella))\nforall x (Hysterical(x) -> Casket(x, nadia))\nforall x (Motley(x) and Disturb(x, isaak) -> Casket(isaak, datha))\nforall x (Disturb(x, datha) and Reforge(x, gisella) -> Hysterical(datha))\n\nnot Reforge(gisella, gisella)\n\nBicolored(gisella) and forall x (Bicolored(x) -> Reforge(x, gisella)) -> therefore Reforge(gisella, gisella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The dianne is partisan. The dianne refracture the leon. The dianne tessellate the leon. The marika buckle the dianne. The marika buckle the sherie. The marika is froward. The marika is delphian. The marika tessellate the dianne. The sherie buckle the marika. The sherie refracture the dianne. The sherie refracture the leon. The leon is athenian. The leon is delphian. The leon refracture the dianne. The leon refracture the sherie. If something is delphian and it buckle the marika then the marika is froward. If the dianne is delphian and the dianne refracture the marika then the dianne buckle the sherie. If something is partisan then it refracture the dianne. If something is froward then it buckle the sherie. If something is delphian and it tessellate the marika then the marika buckle the leon. If something tessellate the leon and it refracture the dianne then the leon is froward. The leon is froward.", "logic": "\nPartisan(dianne)\nRefracture(dianne, leon)\nTessellate(dianne, leon)\nBuckle(marika, dianne)\nBuckle(marika, sherie)\nFroward(marika)\nDelphian(marika)\nTessellate(marika, dianne)\nBuckle(sherie, marika)\nRefracture(sherie, dianne)\nRefracture(sherie, leon)\nAthenian(leon)\nDelphian(leon)\nRefracture(leon, dianne)\nRefracture(leon, sherie)\nforall x (Delphian(x) and Buckle(x, marika) -> Froward(marika))\nDelphian(dianne) and Refracture(dianne, marika) -> Buckle(dianne, sherie)\nforall x (Partisan(x) -> Refracture(x, dianne))\nforall x (Froward(x) -> Buckle(x, sherie))\nforall x (Delphian(x) and Tessellate(x, marika) -> Buckle(marika, leon))\nforall x (Tessellate(x, leon) and Refracture(x, dianne) -> Froward(leon))\n\nFroward(leon)\n\nPartisan(dianne) and forall x (Partisan(x) -> Refracture(x, dianne)) -> therefore Refracture(dianne, dianne) Tessellate(dianne, leon) and Refracture(dianne, dianne) and forall x (Tessellate(x, leon) and Refracture(x, dianne) -> Froward(leon)) -> therefore Froward(leon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The kally is indignant. The kally lead the braden. The kally tattle the braden. The kessia quash the kally. The kessia quash the regine. The kessia is preteen. The kessia is membranous. The kessia tattle the kally. The regine quash the kessia. The regine lead the kally. The regine lead the braden. The braden is cilial. The braden is membranous. The braden lead the kally. The braden lead the regine. If something is membranous and it quash the kessia then the kessia is preteen. If the kally is membranous and the kally lead the kessia then the kally quash the regine. If something is indignant then it lead the kally. If something is preteen then it quash the regine. If something is membranous and it tattle the kessia then the kessia quash the braden. If something tattle the braden and it lead the kally then the braden is preteen. The braden is not preteen.", "logic": "\nIndignant(kally)\nLead(kally, braden)\nTattle(kally, braden)\nQuash(kessia, kally)\nQuash(kessia, regine)\nPreteen(kessia)\nMembranous(kessia)\nTattle(kessia, kally)\nQuash(regine, kessia)\nLead(regine, kally)\nLead(regine, braden)\nCilial(braden)\nMembranous(braden)\nLead(braden, kally)\nLead(braden, regine)\nforall x (Membranous(x) and Quash(x, kessia) -> Preteen(kessia))\nMembranous(kally) and Lead(kally, kessia) -> Quash(kally, regine)\nforall x (Indignant(x) -> Lead(x, kally))\nforall x (Preteen(x) -> Quash(x, regine))\nforall x (Membranous(x) and Tattle(x, kessia) -> Quash(kessia, braden))\nforall x (Tattle(x, braden) and Lead(x, kally) -> Preteen(braden))\n\nnot Preteen(braden)\n\nIndignant(kally) and forall x (Indignant(x) -> Lead(x, kally)) -> therefore Lead(kally, kally) Tattle(kally, braden) and Lead(kally, kally) and forall x (Tattle(x, braden) and Lead(x, kally) -> Preteen(braden)) -> therefore Preteen(braden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The sasha is fervid. The sasha jolt the meggy. The sasha surfeit the meggy. The kendrick hybridise the sasha. The kendrick hybridise the edythe. The kendrick is relaxing. The kendrick is deluxe. The kendrick surfeit the sasha. The edythe hybridise the kendrick. The edythe jolt the sasha. The edythe jolt the meggy. The meggy is libidinous. The meggy is deluxe. The meggy jolt the sasha. The meggy jolt the edythe. If something is deluxe and it hybridise the kendrick then the kendrick is relaxing. If the sasha is deluxe and the sasha jolt the kendrick then the sasha hybridise the edythe. If something is fervid then it jolt the sasha. If something is relaxing then it hybridise the edythe. If something is deluxe and it surfeit the kendrick then the kendrick hybridise the meggy. If something surfeit the meggy and it jolt the sasha then the meggy is relaxing. The meggy hybridise the edythe.", "logic": "\nFervid(sasha)\nJolt(sasha, meggy)\nSurfeit(sasha, meggy)\nHybridise(kendrick, sasha)\nHybridise(kendrick, edythe)\nRelaxing(kendrick)\nDeluxe(kendrick)\nSurfeit(kendrick, sasha)\nHybridise(edythe, kendrick)\nJolt(edythe, sasha)\nJolt(edythe, meggy)\nLibidinous(meggy)\nDeluxe(meggy)\nJolt(meggy, sasha)\nJolt(meggy, edythe)\nforall x (Deluxe(x) and Hybridise(x, kendrick) -> Relaxing(kendrick))\nDeluxe(sasha) and Jolt(sasha, kendrick) -> Hybridise(sasha, edythe)\nforall x (Fervid(x) -> Jolt(x, sasha))\nforall x (Relaxing(x) -> Hybridise(x, edythe))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) and Surfeit(x, kendrick) -> Hybridise(kendrick, meggy))\nforall x (Surfeit(x, meggy) and Jolt(x, sasha) -> Relaxing(meggy))\n\nHybridise(meggy, edythe)\n\nFervid(sasha) and forall x (Fervid(x) -> Jolt(x, sasha)) -> therefore Jolt(sasha, sasha) Surfeit(sasha, meggy) and Jolt(sasha, sasha) and forall x (Surfeit(x, meggy) and Jolt(x, sasha) -> Relaxing(meggy)) -> therefore Relaxing(meggy) Relaxing(meggy) and forall x (Relaxing(x) -> Hybridise(x, edythe)) -> therefore Hybridise(meggy, edythe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The pasquale is ransacked. The pasquale animise the celina. The pasquale bide the celina. The nancey oblige the pasquale. The nancey oblige the waine. The nancey is fretful. The nancey is bald. The nancey bide the pasquale. The waine oblige the nancey. The waine animise the pasquale. The waine animise the celina. The celina is pricey. The celina is bald. The celina animise the pasquale. The celina animise the waine. If something is bald and it oblige the nancey then the nancey is fretful. If the pasquale is bald and the pasquale animise the nancey then the pasquale oblige the waine. If something is ransacked then it animise the pasquale. If something is fretful then it oblige the waine. If something is bald and it bide the nancey then the nancey oblige the celina. If something bide the celina and it animise the pasquale then the celina is fretful. The celina does not eat the waine.", "logic": "\nRansacked(pasquale)\nAnimise(pasquale, celina)\nBide(pasquale, celina)\nOblige(nancey, pasquale)\nOblige(nancey, waine)\nFretful(nancey)\nBald(nancey)\nBide(nancey, pasquale)\nOblige(waine, nancey)\nAnimise(waine, pasquale)\nAnimise(waine, celina)\nPricey(celina)\nBald(celina)\nAnimise(celina, pasquale)\nAnimise(celina, waine)\nforall x (Bald(x) and Oblige(x, nancey) -> Fretful(nancey))\nBald(pasquale) and Animise(pasquale, nancey) -> Oblige(pasquale, waine)\nforall x (Ransacked(x) -> Animise(x, pasquale))\nforall x (Fretful(x) -> Oblige(x, waine))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Bide(x, nancey) -> Oblige(nancey, celina))\nforall x (Bide(x, celina) and Animise(x, pasquale) -> Fretful(celina))\n\nnot Oblige(celina, waine)\n\nRansacked(pasquale) and forall x (Ransacked(x) -> Animise(x, pasquale)) -> therefore Animise(pasquale, pasquale) Bide(pasquale, celina) and Animise(pasquale, pasquale) and forall x (Bide(x, celina) and Animise(x, pasquale) -> Fretful(celina)) -> therefore Fretful(celina) Fretful(celina) and forall x (Fretful(x) -> Oblige(x, waine)) -> therefore Oblige(celina, waine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The francene is hurtful. The francene hamper the murial. The francene correspond the murial. The ardella ravel the francene. The ardella ravel the bunni. The ardella is bolometric. The ardella is intricate. The ardella correspond the francene. The bunni ravel the ardella. The bunni hamper the francene. The bunni hamper the murial. The murial is venetian. The murial is intricate. The murial hamper the francene. The murial hamper the bunni. If something is intricate and it ravel the ardella then the ardella is bolometric. If the francene is intricate and the francene hamper the ardella then the francene ravel the bunni. If something is hurtful then it hamper the francene. If something is bolometric then it ravel the bunni. If something is intricate and it correspond the ardella then the ardella ravel the murial. If something correspond the murial and it hamper the francene then the murial is bolometric. The francene does not eat the bunni.", "logic": "\nHurtful(francene)\nHamper(francene, murial)\nCorrespond(francene, murial)\nRavel(ardella, francene)\nRavel(ardella, bunni)\nBolometric(ardella)\nIntricate(ardella)\nCorrespond(ardella, francene)\nRavel(bunni, ardella)\nHamper(bunni, francene)\nHamper(bunni, murial)\nVenetian(murial)\nIntricate(murial)\nHamper(murial, francene)\nHamper(murial, bunni)\nforall x (Intricate(x) and Ravel(x, ardella) -> Bolometric(ardella))\nIntricate(francene) and Hamper(francene, ardella) -> Ravel(francene, bunni)\nforall x (Hurtful(x) -> Hamper(x, francene))\nforall x (Bolometric(x) -> Ravel(x, bunni))\nforall x (Intricate(x) and Correspond(x, ardella) -> Ravel(ardella, murial))\nforall x (Correspond(x, murial) and Hamper(x, francene) -> Bolometric(murial))\n\nnot Ravel(francene, bunni)\n\nIntricate(francene) and Hamper(francene, ardella) -> Ravel(francene, bunni) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The henrik is spacey. The henrik deprive the lindsy. The henrik alight the lindsy. The debbie mend the henrik. The debbie mend the lisa. The debbie is blond. The debbie is thickened. The debbie alight the henrik. The lisa mend the debbie. The lisa deprive the henrik. The lisa deprive the lindsy. The lindsy is suspect. The lindsy is thickened. The lindsy deprive the henrik. The lindsy deprive the lisa. If something is thickened and it mend the debbie then the debbie is blond. If the henrik is thickened and the henrik deprive the debbie then the henrik mend the lisa. If something is spacey then it deprive the henrik. If something is blond then it mend the lisa. If something is thickened and it alight the debbie then the debbie mend the lindsy. If something alight the lindsy and it deprive the henrik then the lindsy is blond. The debbie mend the lindsy.", "logic": "\nSpacey(henrik)\nDeprive(henrik, lindsy)\nAlight(henrik, lindsy)\nMend(debbie, henrik)\nMend(debbie, lisa)\nBlond(debbie)\nThickened(debbie)\nAlight(debbie, henrik)\nMend(lisa, debbie)\nDeprive(lisa, henrik)\nDeprive(lisa, lindsy)\nSuspect(lindsy)\nThickened(lindsy)\nDeprive(lindsy, henrik)\nDeprive(lindsy, lisa)\nforall x (Thickened(x) and Mend(x, debbie) -> Blond(debbie))\nThickened(henrik) and Deprive(henrik, debbie) -> Mend(henrik, lisa)\nforall x (Spacey(x) -> Deprive(x, henrik))\nforall x (Blond(x) -> Mend(x, lisa))\nforall x (Thickened(x) and Alight(x, debbie) -> Mend(debbie, lindsy))\nforall x (Alight(x, lindsy) and Deprive(x, henrik) -> Blond(lindsy))\n\nMend(debbie, lindsy)\n\nforall x (Thickened(x) and Alight(x, debbie) -> Mend(debbie, lindsy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The aamir is soignee. The aamir arrest the carlita. The aamir throw the carlita. The raphaela tinsel the aamir. The raphaela tinsel the helga. The raphaela is conjunct. The raphaela is stung. The raphaela throw the aamir. The helga tinsel the raphaela. The helga arrest the aamir. The helga arrest the carlita. The carlita is capitalist. The carlita is stung. The carlita arrest the aamir. The carlita arrest the helga. If something is stung and it tinsel the raphaela then the raphaela is conjunct. If the aamir is stung and the aamir arrest the raphaela then the aamir tinsel the helga. If something is soignee then it arrest the aamir. If something is conjunct then it tinsel the helga. If something is stung and it throw the raphaela then the raphaela tinsel the carlita. If something throw the carlita and it arrest the aamir then the carlita is conjunct. The raphaela does not like the aamir.", "logic": "\nSoignee(aamir)\nArrest(aamir, carlita)\nThrow(aamir, carlita)\nTinsel(raphaela, aamir)\nTinsel(raphaela, helga)\nConjunct(raphaela)\nStung(raphaela)\nThrow(raphaela, aamir)\nTinsel(helga, raphaela)\nArrest(helga, aamir)\nArrest(helga, carlita)\nCapitalist(carlita)\nStung(carlita)\nArrest(carlita, aamir)\nArrest(carlita, helga)\nforall x (Stung(x) and Tinsel(x, raphaela) -> Conjunct(raphaela))\nStung(aamir) and Arrest(aamir, raphaela) -> Tinsel(aamir, helga)\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Arrest(x, aamir))\nforall x (Conjunct(x) -> Tinsel(x, helga))\nforall x (Stung(x) and Throw(x, raphaela) -> Tinsel(raphaela, carlita))\nforall x (Throw(x, carlita) and Arrest(x, aamir) -> Conjunct(carlita))\n\nnot Arrest(raphaela, aamir)\n\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Arrest(x, aamir)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The simona is shagged. The simona felicitate the keelia. The simona syphon the keelia. The berni brooch the simona. The berni brooch the aurore. The berni is labiate. The berni is haired. The berni syphon the simona. The aurore brooch the berni. The aurore felicitate the simona. The aurore felicitate the keelia. The keelia is strained. The keelia is haired. The keelia felicitate the simona. The keelia felicitate the aurore. If something is haired and it brooch the berni then the berni is labiate. If the simona is haired and the simona felicitate the berni then the simona brooch the aurore. If something is shagged then it felicitate the simona. If something is labiate then it brooch the aurore. If something is haired and it syphon the berni then the berni brooch the keelia. If something syphon the keelia and it felicitate the simona then the keelia is labiate. The aurore brooch the aurore.", "logic": "\nShagged(simona)\nFelicitate(simona, keelia)\nSyphon(simona, keelia)\nBrooch(berni, simona)\nBrooch(berni, aurore)\nLabiate(berni)\nHaired(berni)\nSyphon(berni, simona)\nBrooch(aurore, berni)\nFelicitate(aurore, simona)\nFelicitate(aurore, keelia)\nStrained(keelia)\nHaired(keelia)\nFelicitate(keelia, simona)\nFelicitate(keelia, aurore)\nforall x (Haired(x) and Brooch(x, berni) -> Labiate(berni))\nHaired(simona) and Felicitate(simona, berni) -> Brooch(simona, aurore)\nforall x (Shagged(x) -> Felicitate(x, simona))\nforall x (Labiate(x) -> Brooch(x, aurore))\nforall x (Haired(x) and Syphon(x, berni) -> Brooch(berni, keelia))\nforall x (Syphon(x, keelia) and Felicitate(x, simona) -> Labiate(keelia))\n\nBrooch(aurore, aurore)\n\nforall x (Labiate(x) -> Brooch(x, aurore)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The charyl is branching. The charyl tingle the griff. The charyl recharge the griff. The norine stack the charyl. The norine stack the greggory. The norine is tyrolean. The norine is subsonic. The norine recharge the charyl. The greggory stack the norine. The greggory tingle the charyl. The greggory tingle the griff. The griff is statutory. The griff is subsonic. The griff tingle the charyl. The griff tingle the greggory. If something is subsonic and it stack the norine then the norine is tyrolean. If the charyl is subsonic and the charyl tingle the norine then the charyl stack the greggory. If something is branching then it tingle the charyl. If something is tyrolean then it stack the greggory. If something is subsonic and it recharge the norine then the norine stack the griff. If something recharge the griff and it tingle the charyl then the griff is tyrolean. The griff is not nice.", "logic": "\nBranching(charyl)\nTingle(charyl, griff)\nRecharge(charyl, griff)\nStack(norine, charyl)\nStack(norine, greggory)\nTyrolean(norine)\nSubsonic(norine)\nRecharge(norine, charyl)\nStack(greggory, norine)\nTingle(greggory, charyl)\nTingle(greggory, griff)\nStatutory(griff)\nSubsonic(griff)\nTingle(griff, charyl)\nTingle(griff, greggory)\nforall x (Subsonic(x) and Stack(x, norine) -> Tyrolean(norine))\nSubsonic(charyl) and Tingle(charyl, norine) -> Stack(charyl, greggory)\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Tingle(x, charyl))\nforall x (Tyrolean(x) -> Stack(x, greggory))\nforall x (Subsonic(x) and Recharge(x, norine) -> Stack(norine, griff))\nforall x (Recharge(x, griff) and Tingle(x, charyl) -> Tyrolean(griff))\n\nnot Nice(griff)\n\nnot Nice(griff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The inna is fourpenny. The inna logroll the benita. The inna bedevil the benita. The gleda prohibit the inna. The gleda prohibit the paddy. The gleda is auricular. The gleda is taxpaying. The gleda bedevil the inna. The paddy prohibit the gleda. The paddy logroll the inna. The paddy logroll the benita. The benita is unbordered. The benita is taxpaying. The benita logroll the inna. The benita logroll the paddy. If something is taxpaying and it prohibit the gleda then the gleda is auricular. If the inna is taxpaying and the inna logroll the gleda then the inna prohibit the paddy. If something is fourpenny then it logroll the inna. If something is auricular then it prohibit the paddy. If something is taxpaying and it bedevil the gleda then the gleda prohibit the benita. If something bedevil the benita and it logroll the inna then the benita is auricular. The gleda bedevil the paddy.", "logic": "\nFourpenny(inna)\nLogroll(inna, benita)\nBedevil(inna, benita)\nProhibit(gleda, inna)\nProhibit(gleda, paddy)\nAuricular(gleda)\nTaxpaying(gleda)\nBedevil(gleda, inna)\nProhibit(paddy, gleda)\nLogroll(paddy, inna)\nLogroll(paddy, benita)\nUnbordered(benita)\nTaxpaying(benita)\nLogroll(benita, inna)\nLogroll(benita, paddy)\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) and Prohibit(x, gleda) -> Auricular(gleda))\nTaxpaying(inna) and Logroll(inna, gleda) -> Prohibit(inna, paddy)\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) -> Logroll(x, inna))\nforall x (Auricular(x) -> Prohibit(x, paddy))\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) and Bedevil(x, gleda) -> Prohibit(gleda, benita))\nforall x (Bedevil(x, benita) and Logroll(x, inna) -> Auricular(benita))\n\nBedevil(gleda, paddy)\n\nBedevil(gleda, paddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The almeda is depressing. The almeda redevelop the waiter. The almeda potter the waiter. The templeton localize the almeda. The templeton localize the rachelle. The templeton is viricidal. The templeton is libidinal. The templeton potter the almeda. The rachelle localize the templeton. The rachelle redevelop the almeda. The rachelle redevelop the waiter. The waiter is chelonian. The waiter is libidinal. The waiter redevelop the almeda. The waiter redevelop the rachelle. If something is libidinal and it localize the templeton then the templeton is viricidal. If the almeda is libidinal and the almeda redevelop the templeton then the almeda localize the rachelle. If something is depressing then it redevelop the almeda. If something is viricidal then it localize the rachelle. If something is libidinal and it potter the templeton then the templeton localize the waiter. If something potter the waiter and it redevelop the almeda then the waiter is viricidal. The rachelle does not like the rachelle.", "logic": "\nDepressing(almeda)\nRedevelop(almeda, waiter)\nPotter(almeda, waiter)\nLocalize(templeton, almeda)\nLocalize(templeton, rachelle)\nViricidal(templeton)\nLibidinal(templeton)\nPotter(templeton, almeda)\nLocalize(rachelle, templeton)\nRedevelop(rachelle, almeda)\nRedevelop(rachelle, waiter)\nChelonian(waiter)\nLibidinal(waiter)\nRedevelop(waiter, almeda)\nRedevelop(waiter, rachelle)\nforall x (Libidinal(x) and Localize(x, templeton) -> Viricidal(templeton))\nLibidinal(almeda) and Redevelop(almeda, templeton) -> Localize(almeda, rachelle)\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Redevelop(x, almeda))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) -> Localize(x, rachelle))\nforall x (Libidinal(x) and Potter(x, templeton) -> Localize(templeton, waiter))\nforall x (Potter(x, waiter) and Redevelop(x, almeda) -> Viricidal(waiter))\n\nnot Redevelop(rachelle, rachelle)\n\nnot Redevelop(rachelle, rachelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "The ruthi is windless. The ruthi peel the suzanne. The ruthi teargas the suzanne. The olympia peep the ruthi. The olympia peep the oswell. The olympia is anguillan. The olympia is duodenal. The olympia teargas the ruthi. The oswell peep the olympia. The oswell peel the ruthi. The oswell peel the suzanne. The suzanne is cognisant. The suzanne is duodenal. The suzanne peel the ruthi. The suzanne peel the oswell. If something is duodenal and it peep the olympia then the olympia is anguillan. If the ruthi is duodenal and the ruthi peel the olympia then the ruthi peep the oswell. If something is windless then it peel the ruthi. If something is anguillan then it peep the oswell. If something is duodenal and it teargas the olympia then the olympia peep the suzanne. If something teargas the suzanne and it peel the ruthi then the suzanne is anguillan. The oswell is windless.", "logic": "\nWindless(ruthi)\nPeel(ruthi, suzanne)\nTeargas(ruthi, suzanne)\nPeep(olympia, ruthi)\nPeep(olympia, oswell)\nAnguillan(olympia)\nDuodenal(olympia)\nTeargas(olympia, ruthi)\nPeep(oswell, olympia)\nPeel(oswell, ruthi)\nPeel(oswell, suzanne)\nCognisant(suzanne)\nDuodenal(suzanne)\nPeel(suzanne, ruthi)\nPeel(suzanne, oswell)\nforall x (Duodenal(x) and Peep(x, olympia) -> Anguillan(olympia))\nDuodenal(ruthi) and Peel(ruthi, olympia) -> Peep(ruthi, oswell)\nforall x (Windless(x) -> Peel(x, ruthi))\nforall x (Anguillan(x) -> Peep(x, oswell))\nforall x (Duodenal(x) and Teargas(x, olympia) -> Peep(olympia, suzanne))\nforall x (Teargas(x, suzanne) and Peel(x, ruthi) -> Anguillan(suzanne))\n\nWindless(oswell)\n\nWindless(oswell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-867"} {"premises": "Catherin is dipolar. Catherin is fireproof. Catherin is abeyant. Catherin is winning. Catherin is pitiful. Corrina is dumb. Cicely is dipolar. Cicely is dumb. Cicely is imbecilic. Cicely is fireproof. Cicely is abeyant. Cicely is winning. Cicely is pitiful. Yolanthe is dipolar. Yolanthe is winning. If someone is fireproof then they are abeyant. If Yolanthe is dipolar and Yolanthe is abeyant then Yolanthe is dumb. All winning people are fireproof. Cicely is dumb.", "logic": "\nDipolar(catherin)\nFireproof(catherin)\nAbeyant(catherin)\nWinning(catherin)\nPitiful(catherin)\nDumb(corrina)\nDipolar(cicely)\nDumb(cicely)\nImbecilic(cicely)\nFireproof(cicely)\nAbeyant(cicely)\nWinning(cicely)\nPitiful(cicely)\nDipolar(yolanthe)\nWinning(yolanthe)\nforall x (Fireproof(x) -> Abeyant(x))\nDipolar(yolanthe) and Abeyant(yolanthe) -> Dumb(yolanthe)\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Fireproof(x))\n\nDumb(cicely)\n\ntherefore Dumb(cicely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Otes is radiopaque. Otes is semisweet. Otes is hexed. Otes is curt. Otes is uncleanly. Tiffy is attacking. Nevil is radiopaque. Nevil is attacking. Nevil is drooping. Nevil is semisweet. Nevil is hexed. Nevil is curt. Nevil is uncleanly. Woodrow is radiopaque. Woodrow is curt. If someone is semisweet then they are hexed. If Woodrow is radiopaque and Woodrow is hexed then Woodrow is attacking. All curt people are semisweet. Nevil is not uncleanly.", "logic": "\nRadiopaque(otes)\nSemisweet(otes)\nHexed(otes)\nCurt(otes)\nUncleanly(otes)\nAttacking(tiffy)\nRadiopaque(nevil)\nAttacking(nevil)\nDrooping(nevil)\nSemisweet(nevil)\nHexed(nevil)\nCurt(nevil)\nUncleanly(nevil)\nRadiopaque(woodrow)\nCurt(woodrow)\nforall x (Semisweet(x) -> Hexed(x))\nRadiopaque(woodrow) and Hexed(woodrow) -> Attacking(woodrow)\nforall x (Curt(x) -> Semisweet(x))\n\nnot Uncleanly(nevil)\n\ntherefore Uncleanly(nevil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Robena is indisposed. Robena is cloistral. Robena is immortal. Robena is pussy. Robena is adjuvant. Bessy is positivist. Arlo is indisposed. Arlo is positivist. Arlo is inexact. Arlo is cloistral. Arlo is immortal. Arlo is pussy. Arlo is adjuvant. Vail is indisposed. Vail is pussy. If someone is cloistral then they are immortal. If Vail is indisposed and Vail is immortal then Vail is positivist. All pussy people are cloistral. Vail is cloistral.", "logic": "\nIndisposed(robena)\nCloistral(robena)\nImmortal(robena)\nPussy(robena)\nAdjuvant(robena)\nPositivist(bessy)\nIndisposed(arlo)\nPositivist(arlo)\nInexact(arlo)\nCloistral(arlo)\nImmortal(arlo)\nPussy(arlo)\nAdjuvant(arlo)\nIndisposed(vail)\nPussy(vail)\nforall x (Cloistral(x) -> Immortal(x))\nIndisposed(vail) and Immortal(vail) -> Positivist(vail)\nforall x (Pussy(x) -> Cloistral(x))\n\nCloistral(vail)\n\nPussy(vail) and forall x (Pussy(x) -> Cloistral(x)) -> therefore Cloistral(vail)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Finley is epidural. Finley is classy. Finley is univalent. Finley is scriptural. Finley is boronic. Jeb is accentual. Honey is epidural. Honey is accentual. Honey is keynesian. Honey is classy. Honey is univalent. Honey is scriptural. Honey is boronic. Charmain is epidural. Charmain is scriptural. If someone is classy then they are univalent. If Charmain is epidural and Charmain is univalent then Charmain is accentual. All scriptural people are classy. Charmain is not classy.", "logic": "\nEpidural(finley)\nClassy(finley)\nUnivalent(finley)\nScriptural(finley)\nBoronic(finley)\nAccentual(jeb)\nEpidural(honey)\nAccentual(honey)\nKeynesian(honey)\nClassy(honey)\nUnivalent(honey)\nScriptural(honey)\nBoronic(honey)\nEpidural(charmain)\nScriptural(charmain)\nforall x (Classy(x) -> Univalent(x))\nEpidural(charmain) and Univalent(charmain) -> Accentual(charmain)\nforall x (Scriptural(x) -> Classy(x))\n\nnot Classy(charmain)\n\nScriptural(charmain) and forall x (Scriptural(x) -> Classy(x)) -> therefore Classy(charmain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Vergil is gusty. Vergil is seeing. Vergil is dismissed. Vergil is customary. Vergil is leglike. Emilio is exogamic. Zacharie is gusty. Zacharie is exogamic. Zacharie is sporting. Zacharie is seeing. Zacharie is dismissed. Zacharie is customary. Zacharie is leglike. Armand is gusty. Armand is customary. If someone is seeing then they are dismissed. If Armand is gusty and Armand is dismissed then Armand is exogamic. All customary people are seeing. Armand is dismissed.", "logic": "\nGusty(vergil)\nSeeing(vergil)\nDismissed(vergil)\nCustomary(vergil)\nLeglike(vergil)\nExogamic(emilio)\nGusty(zacharie)\nExogamic(zacharie)\nSporting(zacharie)\nSeeing(zacharie)\nDismissed(zacharie)\nCustomary(zacharie)\nLeglike(zacharie)\nGusty(armand)\nCustomary(armand)\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Dismissed(x))\nGusty(armand) and Dismissed(armand) -> Exogamic(armand)\nforall x (Customary(x) -> Seeing(x))\n\nDismissed(armand)\n\nCustomary(armand) and forall x (Customary(x) -> Seeing(x)) -> therefore Seeing(armand) Seeing(armand) and forall x (Seeing(x) -> Dismissed(x)) -> therefore Dismissed(armand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Graehme is cashed. Graehme is clumsy. Graehme is arterial. Graehme is equipt. Graehme is webby. Sammy is anagogic. Edeline is cashed. Edeline is anagogic. Edeline is arable. Edeline is clumsy. Edeline is arterial. Edeline is equipt. Edeline is webby. Trix is cashed. Trix is equipt. If someone is clumsy then they are arterial. If Trix is cashed and Trix is arterial then Trix is anagogic. All equipt people are clumsy. Trix is not arterial.", "logic": "\nCashed(graehme)\nClumsy(graehme)\nArterial(graehme)\nEquipt(graehme)\nWebby(graehme)\nAnagogic(sammy)\nCashed(edeline)\nAnagogic(edeline)\nArable(edeline)\nClumsy(edeline)\nArterial(edeline)\nEquipt(edeline)\nWebby(edeline)\nCashed(trix)\nEquipt(trix)\nforall x (Clumsy(x) -> Arterial(x))\nCashed(trix) and Arterial(trix) -> Anagogic(trix)\nforall x (Equipt(x) -> Clumsy(x))\n\nnot Arterial(trix)\n\nEquipt(trix) and forall x (Equipt(x) -> Clumsy(x)) -> therefore Clumsy(trix) Clumsy(trix) and forall x (Clumsy(x) -> Arterial(x)) -> therefore Arterial(trix)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Ruben is lacteal. Ruben is sprouted. Ruben is gladdened. Ruben is brazen. Ruben is filmed. Ellette is canted. Tisha is lacteal. Tisha is canted. Tisha is animal. Tisha is sprouted. Tisha is gladdened. Tisha is brazen. Tisha is filmed. Tania is lacteal. Tania is brazen. If someone is sprouted then they are gladdened. If Tania is lacteal and Tania is gladdened then Tania is canted. All brazen people are sprouted. Tania is canted.", "logic": "\nLacteal(ruben)\nSprouted(ruben)\nGladdened(ruben)\nBrazen(ruben)\nFilmed(ruben)\nCanted(ellette)\nLacteal(tisha)\nCanted(tisha)\nAnimal(tisha)\nSprouted(tisha)\nGladdened(tisha)\nBrazen(tisha)\nFilmed(tisha)\nLacteal(tania)\nBrazen(tania)\nforall x (Sprouted(x) -> Gladdened(x))\nLacteal(tania) and Gladdened(tania) -> Canted(tania)\nforall x (Brazen(x) -> Sprouted(x))\n\nCanted(tania)\n\nBrazen(tania) and forall x (Brazen(x) -> Sprouted(x)) -> therefore Sprouted(tania) Sprouted(tania) and forall x (Sprouted(x) -> Gladdened(x)) -> therefore Gladdened(tania) Lacteal(tania) and Gladdened(tania) and Lacteal(tania) and Gladdened(tania) -> Canted(tania) -> therefore Canted(tania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Cherida is hundred. Cherida is bursal. Cherida is moronic. Cherida is pilose. Cherida is glaring. Nolie is noisy. Ellis is hundred. Ellis is noisy. Ellis is consenting. Ellis is bursal. Ellis is moronic. Ellis is pilose. Ellis is glaring. Fernande is hundred. Fernande is pilose. If someone is bursal then they are moronic. If Fernande is hundred and Fernande is moronic then Fernande is noisy. All pilose people are bursal. Fernande is not noisy.", "logic": "\nHundred(cherida)\nBursal(cherida)\nMoronic(cherida)\nPilose(cherida)\nGlaring(cherida)\nNoisy(nolie)\nHundred(ellis)\nNoisy(ellis)\nConsenting(ellis)\nBursal(ellis)\nMoronic(ellis)\nPilose(ellis)\nGlaring(ellis)\nHundred(fernande)\nPilose(fernande)\nforall x (Bursal(x) -> Moronic(x))\nHundred(fernande) and Moronic(fernande) -> Noisy(fernande)\nforall x (Pilose(x) -> Bursal(x))\n\nnot Noisy(fernande)\n\nPilose(fernande) and forall x (Pilose(x) -> Bursal(x)) -> therefore Bursal(fernande) Bursal(fernande) and forall x (Bursal(x) -> Moronic(x)) -> therefore Moronic(fernande) Hundred(fernande) and Moronic(fernande) and Hundred(fernande) and Moronic(fernande) -> Noisy(fernande) -> therefore Noisy(fernande)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Angeline is virucidal. Angeline is deformed. Angeline is known. Angeline is premium. Angeline is chelate. Maisie is sloping. Margit is virucidal. Margit is sloping. Margit is maroon. Margit is deformed. Margit is known. Margit is premium. Margit is chelate. Greggory is virucidal. Greggory is premium. If someone is deformed then they are known. If Greggory is virucidal and Greggory is known then Greggory is sloping. All premium people are deformed. Maisie is not deformed.", "logic": "\nVirucidal(angeline)\nDeformed(angeline)\nKnown(angeline)\nPremium(angeline)\nChelate(angeline)\nSloping(maisie)\nVirucidal(margit)\nSloping(margit)\nMaroon(margit)\nDeformed(margit)\nKnown(margit)\nPremium(margit)\nChelate(margit)\nVirucidal(greggory)\nPremium(greggory)\nforall x (Deformed(x) -> Known(x))\nVirucidal(greggory) and Known(greggory) -> Sloping(greggory)\nforall x (Premium(x) -> Deformed(x))\n\nnot Deformed(maisie)\n\nforall x (Premium(x) -> Deformed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Florice is cormose. Florice is carnal. Florice is cacogenic. Florice is sold. Florice is epical. Calli is genitive. Charles is cormose. Charles is genitive. Charles is sprawly. Charles is carnal. Charles is cacogenic. Charles is sold. Charles is epical. Waite is cormose. Waite is sold. If someone is carnal then they are cacogenic. If Waite is cormose and Waite is cacogenic then Waite is genitive. All sold people are carnal. Calli is cacogenic.", "logic": "\nCormose(florice)\nCarnal(florice)\nCacogenic(florice)\nSold(florice)\nEpical(florice)\nGenitive(calli)\nCormose(charles)\nGenitive(charles)\nSprawly(charles)\nCarnal(charles)\nCacogenic(charles)\nSold(charles)\nEpical(charles)\nCormose(waite)\nSold(waite)\nforall x (Carnal(x) -> Cacogenic(x))\nCormose(waite) and Cacogenic(waite) -> Genitive(waite)\nforall x (Sold(x) -> Carnal(x))\n\nCacogenic(calli)\n\nforall x (Carnal(x) -> Cacogenic(x)) <- forall x (Sold(x) -> Carnal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Jemmy is upcountry. Jemmy is tropical. Jemmy is aglitter. Jemmy is thrilling. Jemmy is unbranched. Mariette is romany. Lorrin is upcountry. Lorrin is romany. Lorrin is montane. Lorrin is tropical. Lorrin is aglitter. Lorrin is thrilling. Lorrin is unbranched. Odelinda is upcountry. Odelinda is thrilling. If someone is tropical then they are aglitter. If Odelinda is upcountry and Odelinda is aglitter then Odelinda is romany. All thrilling people are tropical. Odelinda is not montane.", "logic": "\nUpcountry(jemmy)\nTropical(jemmy)\nAglitter(jemmy)\nThrilling(jemmy)\nUnbranched(jemmy)\nRomany(mariette)\nUpcountry(lorrin)\nRomany(lorrin)\nMontane(lorrin)\nTropical(lorrin)\nAglitter(lorrin)\nThrilling(lorrin)\nUnbranched(lorrin)\nUpcountry(odelinda)\nThrilling(odelinda)\nforall x (Tropical(x) -> Aglitter(x))\nUpcountry(odelinda) and Aglitter(odelinda) -> Romany(odelinda)\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Tropical(x))\n\nnot Montane(odelinda)\n\nnot Montane(odelinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Barclay is kokka. Barclay is untamed. Barclay is mysterious. Barclay is vitrified. Barclay is crossed. Tedmund is antitumor. Johny is kokka. Johny is antitumor. Johny is voluptuous. Johny is untamed. Johny is mysterious. Johny is vitrified. Johny is crossed. Eberhard is kokka. Eberhard is vitrified. If someone is untamed then they are mysterious. If Eberhard is kokka and Eberhard is mysterious then Eberhard is antitumor. All vitrified people are untamed. Barclay is voluptuous.", "logic": "\nKokka(barclay)\nUntamed(barclay)\nMysterious(barclay)\nVitrified(barclay)\nCrossed(barclay)\nAntitumor(tedmund)\nKokka(johny)\nAntitumor(johny)\nVoluptuous(johny)\nUntamed(johny)\nMysterious(johny)\nVitrified(johny)\nCrossed(johny)\nKokka(eberhard)\nVitrified(eberhard)\nforall x (Untamed(x) -> Mysterious(x))\nKokka(eberhard) and Mysterious(eberhard) -> Antitumor(eberhard)\nforall x (Vitrified(x) -> Untamed(x))\n\nVoluptuous(barclay)\n\nVoluptuous(barclay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Camella is accumbent. Camella is amicable. Camella is wobbling. Camella is sage. Camella is piagetian. Gaston is scurrying. Robinett is accumbent. Robinett is scurrying. Robinett is cheerless. Robinett is amicable. Robinett is wobbling. Robinett is sage. Robinett is piagetian. Renado is accumbent. Renado is sage. If someone is amicable then they are wobbling. If Renado is accumbent and Renado is wobbling then Renado is scurrying. All sage people are amicable. Gaston is not sage.", "logic": "\nAccumbent(camella)\nAmicable(camella)\nWobbling(camella)\nSage(camella)\nPiagetian(camella)\nScurrying(gaston)\nAccumbent(robinett)\nScurrying(robinett)\nCheerless(robinett)\nAmicable(robinett)\nWobbling(robinett)\nSage(robinett)\nPiagetian(robinett)\nAccumbent(renado)\nSage(renado)\nforall x (Amicable(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nAccumbent(renado) and Wobbling(renado) -> Scurrying(renado)\nforall x (Sage(x) -> Amicable(x))\n\nnot Sage(gaston)\n\nnot Sage(gaston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Dmitri is variform. Dmitri is repressive. Dmitri is plumlike. Dmitri is trenchant. Dmitri is catchpenny. Callie is springless. Claudina is variform. Claudina is springless. Claudina is vocal. Claudina is repressive. Claudina is plumlike. Claudina is trenchant. Claudina is catchpenny. Rachele is variform. Rachele is trenchant. If someone is repressive then they are plumlike. If Rachele is variform and Rachele is plumlike then Rachele is springless. All trenchant people are repressive. Callie is variform.", "logic": "\nVariform(dmitri)\nRepressive(dmitri)\nPlumlike(dmitri)\nTrenchant(dmitri)\nCatchpenny(dmitri)\nSpringless(callie)\nVariform(claudina)\nSpringless(claudina)\nVocal(claudina)\nRepressive(claudina)\nPlumlike(claudina)\nTrenchant(claudina)\nCatchpenny(claudina)\nVariform(rachele)\nTrenchant(rachele)\nforall x (Repressive(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nVariform(rachele) and Plumlike(rachele) -> Springless(rachele)\nforall x (Trenchant(x) -> Repressive(x))\n\nVariform(callie)\n\nVariform(callie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Edouard is tied. Edouard is superior. Edouard is inhuman. Edouard is mercenary. Edouard is cumuliform. Lorianna is falciform. Sherye is tied. Sherye is falciform. Sherye is choky. Sherye is superior. Sherye is inhuman. Sherye is mercenary. Sherye is cumuliform. Freemon is tied. Freemon is mercenary. If someone is superior then they are inhuman. If Freemon is tied and Freemon is inhuman then Freemon is falciform. All mercenary people are superior. Lorianna is not choky.", "logic": "\nTied(edouard)\nSuperior(edouard)\nInhuman(edouard)\nMercenary(edouard)\nCumuliform(edouard)\nFalciform(lorianna)\nTied(sherye)\nFalciform(sherye)\nChoky(sherye)\nSuperior(sherye)\nInhuman(sherye)\nMercenary(sherye)\nCumuliform(sherye)\nTied(freemon)\nMercenary(freemon)\nforall x (Superior(x) -> Inhuman(x))\nTied(freemon) and Inhuman(freemon) -> Falciform(freemon)\nforall x (Mercenary(x) -> Superior(x))\n\nnot Choky(lorianna)\n\nnot Choky(lorianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Enrique is centered. Enrique is oxidizable. Enrique is coriaceous. Enrique is pleading. Enrique is chanceful. Ursa is revertible. Meggan is centered. Meggan is revertible. Meggan is univalent. Meggan is oxidizable. Meggan is coriaceous. Meggan is pleading. Meggan is chanceful. Marieann is centered. Marieann is pleading. If someone is oxidizable then they are coriaceous. If Marieann is centered and Marieann is coriaceous then Marieann is revertible. All pleading people are oxidizable. Ursa is chanceful.", "logic": "\nCentered(enrique)\nOxidizable(enrique)\nCoriaceous(enrique)\nPleading(enrique)\nChanceful(enrique)\nRevertible(ursa)\nCentered(meggan)\nRevertible(meggan)\nUnivalent(meggan)\nOxidizable(meggan)\nCoriaceous(meggan)\nPleading(meggan)\nChanceful(meggan)\nCentered(marieann)\nPleading(marieann)\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) -> Coriaceous(x))\nCentered(marieann) and Coriaceous(marieann) -> Revertible(marieann)\nforall x (Pleading(x) -> Oxidizable(x))\n\nChanceful(ursa)\n\nChanceful(ursa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1889"} {"premises": "Burke is not confutable. Carline is apocryphal. If Carline is apocryphal then Carline is confutable. If something is apocryphal and confutable then it is bounteous. If something is apocryphal and not outraged then it is caudate. All blastular things are caudate. All outraged things are equestrian. If something is apocryphal and caudate then it is equestrian. If something is bounteous then it is equestrian. If something is outraged and not bounteous then it is not blastular. Carline is apocryphal.", "logic": "\nnot Confutable(burke)\nApocryphal(carline)\nApocryphal(carline) -> Confutable(carline)\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and Confutable(x) -> Bounteous(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and not Outraged(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Caudate(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and Caudate(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nforall x (Bounteous(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) and not Bounteous(x) -> not Blastular(x))\n\nApocryphal(carline)\n\ntherefore Apocryphal(carline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Krystalle is not civilian. Betteann is insurgent. If Betteann is insurgent then Betteann is civilian. If something is insurgent and civilian then it is unsavory. If something is insurgent and not fallow then it is planar. All nonelected things are planar. All fallow things are iliac. If something is insurgent and planar then it is iliac. If something is unsavory then it is iliac. If something is fallow and not unsavory then it is not nonelected. Krystalle is civilian.", "logic": "\nnot Civilian(krystalle)\nInsurgent(betteann)\nInsurgent(betteann) -> Civilian(betteann)\nforall x (Insurgent(x) and Civilian(x) -> Unsavory(x))\nforall x (Insurgent(x) and not Fallow(x) -> Planar(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) -> Planar(x))\nforall x (Fallow(x) -> Iliac(x))\nforall x (Insurgent(x) and Planar(x) -> Iliac(x))\nforall x (Unsavory(x) -> Iliac(x))\nforall x (Fallow(x) and not Unsavory(x) -> not Nonelected(x))\n\nCivilian(krystalle)\n\ntherefore not Civilian(krystalle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Danie is not violative. Emmy is even. If Emmy is even then Emmy is violative. If something is even and violative then it is ionian. If something is even and not valuable then it is irksome. All arch things are irksome. All valuable things are directive. If something is even and irksome then it is directive. If something is ionian then it is directive. If something is valuable and not ionian then it is not arch. Emmy is violative.", "logic": "\nnot Violative(danie)\nEven(emmy)\nEven(emmy) -> Violative(emmy)\nforall x (Even(x) and Violative(x) -> Ionian(x))\nforall x (Even(x) and not Valuable(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Arch(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Valuable(x) -> Directive(x))\nforall x (Even(x) and Irksome(x) -> Directive(x))\nforall x (Ionian(x) -> Directive(x))\nforall x (Valuable(x) and not Ionian(x) -> not Arch(x))\n\nViolative(emmy)\n\nEven(emmy) and Even(emmy) -> Violative(emmy) -> therefore Violative(emmy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Indira is not euclidean. Sally is pasteurian. If Sally is pasteurian then Sally is euclidean. If something is pasteurian and euclidean then it is preachy. If something is pasteurian and not downtown then it is autoimmune. All statuary things are autoimmune. All downtown things are momentous. If something is pasteurian and autoimmune then it is momentous. If something is preachy then it is momentous. If something is downtown and not preachy then it is not statuary. Sally is not euclidean.", "logic": "\nnot Euclidean(indira)\nPasteurian(sally)\nPasteurian(sally) -> Euclidean(sally)\nforall x (Pasteurian(x) and Euclidean(x) -> Preachy(x))\nforall x (Pasteurian(x) and not Downtown(x) -> Autoimmune(x))\nforall x (Statuary(x) -> Autoimmune(x))\nforall x (Downtown(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Pasteurian(x) and Autoimmune(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Preachy(x) -> Momentous(x))\nforall x (Downtown(x) and not Preachy(x) -> not Statuary(x))\n\nnot Euclidean(sally)\n\nPasteurian(sally) and Pasteurian(sally) -> Euclidean(sally) -> therefore Euclidean(sally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Oberon is not defunct. Johannes is sixfold. If Johannes is sixfold then Johannes is defunct. If something is sixfold and defunct then it is semitropic. If something is sixfold and not mucinoid then it is fossilised. All jangly things are fossilised. All mucinoid things are connatural. If something is sixfold and fossilised then it is connatural. If something is semitropic then it is connatural. If something is mucinoid and not semitropic then it is not jangly. Johannes is semitropic.", "logic": "\nnot Defunct(oberon)\nSixfold(johannes)\nSixfold(johannes) -> Defunct(johannes)\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and Defunct(x) -> Semitropic(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and not Mucinoid(x) -> Fossilised(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) -> Fossilised(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Connatural(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and Fossilised(x) -> Connatural(x))\nforall x (Semitropic(x) -> Connatural(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) and not Semitropic(x) -> not Jangly(x))\n\nSemitropic(johannes)\n\nSixfold(johannes) and Sixfold(johannes) -> Defunct(johannes) -> therefore Defunct(johannes) Sixfold(johannes) and Defunct(johannes) and forall x (Sixfold(x) and Defunct(x) -> Semitropic(x)) -> therefore Semitropic(johannes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Larissa is not manic. Dan is wrinkled. If Dan is wrinkled then Dan is manic. If something is wrinkled and manic then it is puny. If something is wrinkled and not blasting then it is ministrant. All peeled things are ministrant. All blasting things are lxxxii. If something is wrinkled and ministrant then it is lxxxii. If something is puny then it is lxxxii. If something is blasting and not puny then it is not peeled. Dan is not puny.", "logic": "\nnot Manic(larissa)\nWrinkled(dan)\nWrinkled(dan) -> Manic(dan)\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) and Manic(x) -> Puny(x))\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) and not Blasting(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Peeled(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Blasting(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Wrinkled(x) and Ministrant(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Puny(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nforall x (Blasting(x) and not Puny(x) -> not Peeled(x))\n\nnot Puny(dan)\n\nWrinkled(dan) and Wrinkled(dan) -> Manic(dan) -> therefore Manic(dan) Wrinkled(dan) and Manic(dan) and forall x (Wrinkled(x) and Manic(x) -> Puny(x)) -> therefore Puny(dan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Ebeneser is not earthborn. Dimitris is galore. If Dimitris is galore then Dimitris is earthborn. If something is galore and earthborn then it is loverlike. If something is galore and not frail then it is crackers. All wheelless things are crackers. All frail things are papuan. If something is galore and crackers then it is papuan. If something is loverlike then it is papuan. If something is frail and not loverlike then it is not wheelless. Dimitris is papuan.", "logic": "\nnot Earthborn(ebeneser)\nGalore(dimitris)\nGalore(dimitris) -> Earthborn(dimitris)\nforall x (Galore(x) and Earthborn(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Galore(x) and not Frail(x) -> Crackers(x))\nforall x (Wheelless(x) -> Crackers(x))\nforall x (Frail(x) -> Papuan(x))\nforall x (Galore(x) and Crackers(x) -> Papuan(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Papuan(x))\nforall x (Frail(x) and not Loverlike(x) -> not Wheelless(x))\n\nPapuan(dimitris)\n\nGalore(dimitris) and Galore(dimitris) -> Earthborn(dimitris) -> therefore Earthborn(dimitris) Galore(dimitris) and Earthborn(dimitris) and forall x (Galore(x) and Earthborn(x) -> Loverlike(x)) -> therefore Loverlike(dimitris) Loverlike(dimitris) and forall x (Loverlike(x) -> Papuan(x)) -> therefore Papuan(dimitris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Bennet is not broadnosed. Amandy is remedial. If Amandy is remedial then Amandy is broadnosed. If something is remedial and broadnosed then it is disloyal. If something is remedial and not flustered then it is unvigilant. All pursued things are unvigilant. All flustered things are intent. If something is remedial and unvigilant then it is intent. If something is disloyal then it is intent. If something is flustered and not disloyal then it is not pursued. Amandy is not intent.", "logic": "\nnot Broadnosed(bennet)\nRemedial(amandy)\nRemedial(amandy) -> Broadnosed(amandy)\nforall x (Remedial(x) and Broadnosed(x) -> Disloyal(x))\nforall x (Remedial(x) and not Flustered(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\nforall x (Pursued(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Intent(x))\nforall x (Remedial(x) and Unvigilant(x) -> Intent(x))\nforall x (Disloyal(x) -> Intent(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) and not Disloyal(x) -> not Pursued(x))\n\nnot Intent(amandy)\n\nRemedial(amandy) and Remedial(amandy) -> Broadnosed(amandy) -> therefore Broadnosed(amandy) Remedial(amandy) and Broadnosed(amandy) and forall x (Remedial(x) and Broadnosed(x) -> Disloyal(x)) -> therefore Disloyal(amandy) Disloyal(amandy) and forall x (Disloyal(x) -> Intent(x)) -> therefore Intent(amandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Jermain is not satanic. Jeanelle is peninsular. If Jeanelle is peninsular then Jeanelle is satanic. If something is peninsular and satanic then it is mancunian. If something is peninsular and not maggoty then it is thrown. All assurgent things are thrown. All maggoty things are sapient. If something is peninsular and thrown then it is sapient. If something is mancunian then it is sapient. If something is maggoty and not mancunian then it is not assurgent. Jermain is not mancunian.", "logic": "\nnot Satanic(jermain)\nPeninsular(jeanelle)\nPeninsular(jeanelle) -> Satanic(jeanelle)\nforall x (Peninsular(x) and Satanic(x) -> Mancunian(x))\nforall x (Peninsular(x) and not Maggoty(x) -> Thrown(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) -> Thrown(x))\nforall x (Maggoty(x) -> Sapient(x))\nforall x (Peninsular(x) and Thrown(x) -> Sapient(x))\nforall x (Mancunian(x) -> Sapient(x))\nforall x (Maggoty(x) and not Mancunian(x) -> not Assurgent(x))\n\nnot Mancunian(jermain)\n\nforall x (Peninsular(x) and Satanic(x) -> Mancunian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Meaghan is not belittled. Odin is boss. If Odin is boss then Odin is belittled. If something is boss and belittled then it is bivalent. If something is boss and not niffy then it is seamy. All milch things are seamy. All niffy things are unswept. If something is boss and seamy then it is unswept. If something is bivalent then it is unswept. If something is niffy and not bivalent then it is not milch. Odin is seamy.", "logic": "\nnot Belittled(meaghan)\nBoss(odin)\nBoss(odin) -> Belittled(odin)\nforall x (Boss(x) and Belittled(x) -> Bivalent(x))\nforall x (Boss(x) and not Niffy(x) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Milch(x) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Boss(x) and Seamy(x) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Bivalent(x) -> Unswept(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) and not Bivalent(x) -> not Milch(x))\n\nSeamy(odin)\n\nforall x (Boss(x) and not Niffy(x) -> Seamy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Georgiana is not adscript. Thacher is penumbral. If Thacher is penumbral then Thacher is adscript. If something is penumbral and adscript then it is crownless. If something is penumbral and not wearisome then it is resistive. All lxxxvii things are resistive. All wearisome things are biogenetic. If something is penumbral and resistive then it is biogenetic. If something is crownless then it is biogenetic. If something is wearisome and not crownless then it is not lxxxvii. Georgiana is not resistive.", "logic": "\nnot Adscript(georgiana)\nPenumbral(thacher)\nPenumbral(thacher) -> Adscript(thacher)\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and Adscript(x) -> Crownless(x))\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and not Wearisome(x) -> Resistive(x))\nforall x (Lxxxvii(x) -> Resistive(x))\nforall x (Wearisome(x) -> Biogenetic(x))\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and Resistive(x) -> Biogenetic(x))\nforall x (Crownless(x) -> Biogenetic(x))\nforall x (Wearisome(x) and not Crownless(x) -> not Lxxxvii(x))\n\nnot Resistive(georgiana)\n\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and not Wearisome(x) -> Resistive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Gustaf is not dyspnoeal. Devin is ichorous. If Devin is ichorous then Devin is dyspnoeal. If something is ichorous and dyspnoeal then it is convivial. If something is ichorous and not ireful then it is crenated. All campanular things are crenated. All ireful things are prevenient. If something is ichorous and crenated then it is prevenient. If something is convivial then it is prevenient. If something is ireful and not convivial then it is not campanular. Gustaf is prevenient.", "logic": "\nnot Dyspnoeal(gustaf)\nIchorous(devin)\nIchorous(devin) -> Dyspnoeal(devin)\nforall x (Ichorous(x) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> Convivial(x))\nforall x (Ichorous(x) and not Ireful(x) -> Crenated(x))\nforall x (Campanular(x) -> Crenated(x))\nforall x (Ireful(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Ichorous(x) and Crenated(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nforall x (Ireful(x) and not Convivial(x) -> not Campanular(x))\n\nPrevenient(gustaf)\n\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Prevenient(x)) <- forall x (Ichorous(x) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> Convivial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Cesya is not stooped. Vilma is flagellate. If Vilma is flagellate then Vilma is stooped. If something is flagellate and stooped then it is nigerien. If something is flagellate and not synonymous then it is bracteal. All oval things are bracteal. All synonymous things are unsnarled. If something is flagellate and bracteal then it is unsnarled. If something is nigerien then it is unsnarled. If something is synonymous and not nigerien then it is not oval. Vilma is not synonymous.", "logic": "\nnot Stooped(cesya)\nFlagellate(vilma)\nFlagellate(vilma) -> Stooped(vilma)\nforall x (Flagellate(x) and Stooped(x) -> Nigerien(x))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) and not Synonymous(x) -> Bracteal(x))\nforall x (Oval(x) -> Bracteal(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) -> Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Flagellate(x) and Bracteal(x) -> Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Nigerien(x) -> Unsnarled(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) and not Nigerien(x) -> not Oval(x))\n\nnot Synonymous(vilma)\n\nnot Synonymous(vilma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Eadith is not palpebrate. Friedrich is incurved. If Friedrich is incurved then Friedrich is palpebrate. If something is incurved and palpebrate then it is ascensive. If something is incurved and not glorious then it is ready. All sluttish things are ready. All glorious things are adjustable. If something is incurved and ready then it is adjustable. If something is ascensive then it is adjustable. If something is glorious and not ascensive then it is not sluttish. Eadith is sluttish.", "logic": "\nnot Palpebrate(eadith)\nIncurved(friedrich)\nIncurved(friedrich) -> Palpebrate(friedrich)\nforall x (Incurved(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) and not Glorious(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Sluttish(x) -> Ready(x))\nforall x (Glorious(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) and Ready(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Glorious(x) and not Ascensive(x) -> not Sluttish(x))\n\nSluttish(eadith)\n\nSluttish(eadith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Chevalier is not onshore. Celestyna is disposed. If Celestyna is disposed then Celestyna is onshore. If something is disposed and onshore then it is cogent. If something is disposed and not unsworn then it is bodiless. All wonderful things are bodiless. All unsworn things are angled. If something is disposed and bodiless then it is angled. If something is cogent then it is angled. If something is unsworn and not cogent then it is not wonderful. Chevalier is not disposed.", "logic": "\nnot Onshore(chevalier)\nDisposed(celestyna)\nDisposed(celestyna) -> Onshore(celestyna)\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Onshore(x) -> Cogent(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and not Unsworn(x) -> Bodiless(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) -> Bodiless(x))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) -> Angled(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Bodiless(x) -> Angled(x))\nforall x (Cogent(x) -> Angled(x))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) and not Cogent(x) -> not Wonderful(x))\n\nnot Disposed(chevalier)\n\nnot Disposed(chevalier) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "Breanne is not coral. Angelia is ossiferous. If Angelia is ossiferous then Angelia is coral. If something is ossiferous and coral then it is semestral. If something is ossiferous and not second then it is unuttered. All devoted things are unuttered. All second things are blabby. If something is ossiferous and unuttered then it is blabby. If something is semestral then it is blabby. If something is second and not semestral then it is not devoted. Angelia is devoted.", "logic": "\nnot Coral(breanne)\nOssiferous(angelia)\nOssiferous(angelia) -> Coral(angelia)\nforall x (Ossiferous(x) and Coral(x) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Ossiferous(x) and not Second(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Second(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Ossiferous(x) and Unuttered(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Semestral(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Second(x) and not Semestral(x) -> not Devoted(x))\n\nDevoted(angelia)\n\nDevoted(angelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1092"} {"premises": "The henrietta retrogress the rafaelia. The henrietta retrogress the elwira. The henrietta is stock. The henrietta is not germinal. The henrietta environ the elwira. The rafaelia retrogress the henrietta. The rafaelia is germinal. The rafaelia clinch the elwira. The elwira does not chase the henrietta. The elwira is germinal. The elwira clinch the henrietta. The elwira clinch the rafaelia. If the henrietta environ the rafaelia and the henrietta is not germinal then the rafaelia is edged. If someone environ the elwira and the elwira clinch the rafaelia then the rafaelia retrogress the henrietta. If someone environ the elwira then they visit the elwira. If the rafaelia is ploughed and the rafaelia is not germinal then the rafaelia is not nihilistic. If someone retrogress the elwira then they visit the henrietta. If someone is edged then they do not visit the rafaelia. The elwira does not chase the henrietta.", "logic": "\nRetrogress(henrietta, rafaelia)\nRetrogress(henrietta, elwira)\nStock(henrietta)\nnot Germinal(henrietta)\nEnviron(henrietta, elwira)\nRetrogress(rafaelia, henrietta)\nGerminal(rafaelia)\nClinch(rafaelia, elwira)\nnot Retrogress(elwira, henrietta)\nGerminal(elwira)\nClinch(elwira, henrietta)\nClinch(elwira, rafaelia)\nEnviron(henrietta, rafaelia) and not Germinal(henrietta) -> Edged(rafaelia)\nforall x (Environ(x, elwira) and Clinch(elwira, rafaelia) -> Retrogress(rafaelia, henrietta))\nforall x (Environ(x, elwira) -> Clinch(x, elwira))\nPloughed(rafaelia) and not Germinal(rafaelia) -> not Nihilistic(rafaelia)\nforall x (Retrogress(x, elwira) -> Clinch(x, henrietta))\nforall x (Edged(x) -> not Clinch(x, rafaelia))\n\nnot Retrogress(elwira, henrietta)\n\ntherefore not Retrogress(elwira, henrietta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "The frankie compromise the bonny. The frankie compromise the engelbart. The frankie is aculeated. The frankie is not shoreward. The frankie lade the engelbart. The bonny compromise the frankie. The bonny is shoreward. The bonny compile the engelbart. The engelbart does not chase the frankie. The engelbart is shoreward. The engelbart compile the frankie. The engelbart compile the bonny. If the frankie lade the bonny and the frankie is not shoreward then the bonny is xxxi. If someone lade the engelbart and the engelbart compile the bonny then the bonny compromise the frankie. If someone lade the engelbart then they visit the engelbart. If the bonny is uvular and the bonny is not shoreward then the bonny is not tubeless. If someone compromise the engelbart then they visit the frankie. If someone is xxxi then they do not visit the bonny. The bonny does not visit the engelbart.", "logic": "\nCompromise(frankie, bonny)\nCompromise(frankie, engelbart)\nAculeated(frankie)\nnot Shoreward(frankie)\nLade(frankie, engelbart)\nCompromise(bonny, frankie)\nShoreward(bonny)\nCompile(bonny, engelbart)\nnot Compromise(engelbart, frankie)\nShoreward(engelbart)\nCompile(engelbart, frankie)\nCompile(engelbart, bonny)\nLade(frankie, bonny) and not Shoreward(frankie) -> Xxxi(bonny)\nforall x (Lade(x, engelbart) and Compile(engelbart, bonny) -> Compromise(bonny, frankie))\nforall x (Lade(x, engelbart) -> Compile(x, engelbart))\nUvular(bonny) and not Shoreward(bonny) -> not Tubeless(bonny)\nforall x (Compromise(x, engelbart) -> Compile(x, frankie))\nforall x (Xxxi(x) -> not Compile(x, bonny))\n\nnot Compile(bonny, engelbart)\n\ntherefore Compile(bonny, engelbart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "The neille wrack the marta. The neille wrack the gunner. The neille is maidenly. The neille is not gambian. The neille service the gunner. The marta wrack the neille. The marta is gambian. The marta compass the gunner. The gunner does not chase the neille. The gunner is gambian. The gunner compass the neille. The gunner compass the marta. If the neille service the marta and the neille is not gambian then the marta is anthropic. If someone service the gunner and the gunner compass the marta then the marta wrack the neille. If someone service the gunner then they visit the gunner. If the marta is guyanese and the marta is not gambian then the marta is not agnatic. If someone wrack the gunner then they visit the neille. If someone is anthropic then they do not visit the marta. The neille compass the gunner.", "logic": "\nWrack(neille, marta)\nWrack(neille, gunner)\nMaidenly(neille)\nnot Gambian(neille)\nService(neille, gunner)\nWrack(marta, neille)\nGambian(marta)\nCompass(marta, gunner)\nnot Wrack(gunner, neille)\nGambian(gunner)\nCompass(gunner, neille)\nCompass(gunner, marta)\nService(neille, marta) and not Gambian(neille) -> Anthropic(marta)\nforall x (Service(x, gunner) and Compass(gunner, marta) -> Wrack(marta, neille))\nforall x (Service(x, gunner) -> Compass(x, gunner))\nGuyanese(marta) and not Gambian(marta) -> not Agnatic(marta)\nforall x (Wrack(x, gunner) -> Compass(x, neille))\nforall x (Anthropic(x) -> not Compass(x, marta))\n\nCompass(neille, gunner)\n\nService(neille, gunner) and forall x (Service(x, gunner) -> Compass(x, gunner)) -> therefore Compass(neille, gunner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "The marketa forestall the dew. The marketa forestall the jany. The marketa is unguided. The marketa is not disclike. The marketa think the jany. The dew forestall the marketa. The dew is disclike. The dew seduce the jany. The jany does not chase the marketa. The jany is disclike. The jany seduce the marketa. The jany seduce the dew. If the marketa think the dew and the marketa is not disclike then the dew is neglectful. If someone think the jany and the jany seduce the dew then the dew forestall the marketa. If someone think the jany then they visit the jany. If the dew is steep and the dew is not disclike then the dew is not wholesale. If someone forestall the jany then they visit the marketa. If someone is neglectful then they do not visit the dew. The marketa does not visit the jany.", "logic": "\nForestall(marketa, dew)\nForestall(marketa, jany)\nUnguided(marketa)\nnot Disclike(marketa)\nThink(marketa, jany)\nForestall(dew, marketa)\nDisclike(dew)\nSeduce(dew, jany)\nnot Forestall(jany, marketa)\nDisclike(jany)\nSeduce(jany, marketa)\nSeduce(jany, dew)\nThink(marketa, dew) and not Disclike(marketa) -> Neglectful(dew)\nforall x (Think(x, jany) and Seduce(jany, dew) -> Forestall(dew, marketa))\nforall x (Think(x, jany) -> Seduce(x, jany))\nSteep(dew) and not Disclike(dew) -> not Wholesale(dew)\nforall x (Forestall(x, jany) -> Seduce(x, marketa))\nforall x (Neglectful(x) -> not Seduce(x, dew))\n\nnot Seduce(marketa, jany)\n\nThink(marketa, jany) and forall x (Think(x, jany) -> Seduce(x, jany)) -> therefore Seduce(marketa, jany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "The shurlocke overwork the nikkie. The shurlocke overwork the corilla. The shurlocke is forward. The shurlocke is not glum. The shurlocke refurnish the corilla. The nikkie overwork the shurlocke. The nikkie is glum. The nikkie realign the corilla. The corilla does not chase the shurlocke. The corilla is glum. The corilla realign the shurlocke. The corilla realign the nikkie. If the shurlocke refurnish the nikkie and the shurlocke is not glum then the nikkie is maledict. If someone refurnish the corilla and the corilla realign the nikkie then the nikkie overwork the shurlocke. If someone refurnish the corilla then they visit the corilla. If the nikkie is dread and the nikkie is not glum then the nikkie is not aroid. If someone overwork the corilla then they visit the shurlocke. If someone is maledict then they do not visit the nikkie. The nikkie does not visit the shurlocke.", "logic": "\nOverwork(shurlocke, nikkie)\nOverwork(shurlocke, corilla)\nForward(shurlocke)\nnot Glum(shurlocke)\nRefurnish(shurlocke, corilla)\nOverwork(nikkie, shurlocke)\nGlum(nikkie)\nRealign(nikkie, corilla)\nnot Overwork(corilla, shurlocke)\nGlum(corilla)\nRealign(corilla, shurlocke)\nRealign(corilla, nikkie)\nRefurnish(shurlocke, nikkie) and not Glum(shurlocke) -> Maledict(nikkie)\nforall x (Refurnish(x, corilla) and Realign(corilla, nikkie) -> Overwork(nikkie, shurlocke))\nforall x (Refurnish(x, corilla) -> Realign(x, corilla))\nDread(nikkie) and not Glum(nikkie) -> not Aroid(nikkie)\nforall x (Overwork(x, corilla) -> Realign(x, shurlocke))\nforall x (Maledict(x) -> not Realign(x, nikkie))\n\nnot Realign(nikkie, shurlocke)\n\nforall x (Overwork(x, corilla) -> Realign(x, shurlocke)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "The derby cage the marian. The derby cage the fortuna. The derby is bracted. The derby is not riskless. The derby rocket the fortuna. The marian cage the derby. The marian is riskless. The marian sexualise the fortuna. The fortuna does not chase the derby. The fortuna is riskless. The fortuna sexualise the derby. The fortuna sexualise the marian. If the derby rocket the marian and the derby is not riskless then the marian is sundried. If someone rocket the fortuna and the fortuna sexualise the marian then the marian cage the derby. If someone rocket the fortuna then they visit the fortuna. If the marian is convoluted and the marian is not riskless then the marian is not paradisaic. If someone cage the fortuna then they visit the derby. If someone is sundried then they do not visit the marian. The fortuna sexualise the fortuna.", "logic": "\nCage(derby, marian)\nCage(derby, fortuna)\nBracted(derby)\nnot Riskless(derby)\nRocket(derby, fortuna)\nCage(marian, derby)\nRiskless(marian)\nSexualise(marian, fortuna)\nnot Cage(fortuna, derby)\nRiskless(fortuna)\nSexualise(fortuna, derby)\nSexualise(fortuna, marian)\nRocket(derby, marian) and not Riskless(derby) -> Sundried(marian)\nforall x (Rocket(x, fortuna) and Sexualise(fortuna, marian) -> Cage(marian, derby))\nforall x (Rocket(x, fortuna) -> Sexualise(x, fortuna))\nConvoluted(marian) and not Riskless(marian) -> not Paradisaic(marian)\nforall x (Cage(x, fortuna) -> Sexualise(x, derby))\nforall x (Sundried(x) -> not Sexualise(x, marian))\n\nSexualise(fortuna, fortuna)\n\nforall x (Rocket(x, fortuna) -> Sexualise(x, fortuna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "The tresa record the andrew. The tresa record the harlan. The tresa is corporal. The tresa is not lustreless. The tresa deaf the harlan. The andrew record the tresa. The andrew is lustreless. The andrew parch the harlan. The harlan does not chase the tresa. The harlan is lustreless. The harlan parch the tresa. The harlan parch the andrew. If the tresa deaf the andrew and the tresa is not lustreless then the andrew is vigesimal. If someone deaf the harlan and the harlan parch the andrew then the andrew record the tresa. If someone deaf the harlan then they visit the harlan. If the andrew is downstair and the andrew is not lustreless then the andrew is not unfeeling. If someone record the harlan then they visit the tresa. If someone is vigesimal then they do not visit the andrew. The harlan does not see the harlan.", "logic": "\nRecord(tresa, andrew)\nRecord(tresa, harlan)\nCorporal(tresa)\nnot Lustreless(tresa)\nDeaf(tresa, harlan)\nRecord(andrew, tresa)\nLustreless(andrew)\nParch(andrew, harlan)\nnot Record(harlan, tresa)\nLustreless(harlan)\nParch(harlan, tresa)\nParch(harlan, andrew)\nDeaf(tresa, andrew) and not Lustreless(tresa) -> Vigesimal(andrew)\nforall x (Deaf(x, harlan) and Parch(harlan, andrew) -> Record(andrew, tresa))\nforall x (Deaf(x, harlan) -> Parch(x, harlan))\nDownstair(andrew) and not Lustreless(andrew) -> not Unfeeling(andrew)\nforall x (Record(x, harlan) -> Parch(x, tresa))\nforall x (Vigesimal(x) -> not Parch(x, andrew))\n\nnot Deaf(harlan, harlan)\n\nnot Deaf(harlan, harlan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "The gerladina derestrict the caria. The gerladina derestrict the lorette. The gerladina is bitumenoid. The gerladina is not midwestern. The gerladina target the lorette. The caria derestrict the gerladina. The caria is midwestern. The caria avail the lorette. The lorette does not chase the gerladina. The lorette is midwestern. The lorette avail the gerladina. The lorette avail the caria. If the gerladina target the caria and the gerladina is not midwestern then the caria is unironed. If someone target the lorette and the lorette avail the caria then the caria derestrict the gerladina. If someone target the lorette then they visit the lorette. If the caria is piquant and the caria is not midwestern then the caria is not moody. If someone derestrict the lorette then they visit the gerladina. If someone is unironed then they do not visit the caria. The gerladina is moody.", "logic": "\nDerestrict(gerladina, caria)\nDerestrict(gerladina, lorette)\nBitumenoid(gerladina)\nnot Midwestern(gerladina)\nTarget(gerladina, lorette)\nDerestrict(caria, gerladina)\nMidwestern(caria)\nAvail(caria, lorette)\nnot Derestrict(lorette, gerladina)\nMidwestern(lorette)\nAvail(lorette, gerladina)\nAvail(lorette, caria)\nTarget(gerladina, caria) and not Midwestern(gerladina) -> Unironed(caria)\nforall x (Target(x, lorette) and Avail(lorette, caria) -> Derestrict(caria, gerladina))\nforall x (Target(x, lorette) -> Avail(x, lorette))\nPiquant(caria) and not Midwestern(caria) -> not Moody(caria)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, lorette) -> Avail(x, gerladina))\nforall x (Unironed(x) -> not Avail(x, caria))\n\nMoody(gerladina)\n\nMoody(gerladina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-149"} {"premises": "Tobye is turbinate. Tobye is inviting. Tobye is protecting. All inviting, unsorted things are anuric. All protecting, incidental things are anuric. If Tobye is turbinate then Tobye is incidental. If something is inviting then it is turbinate. If Tobye is anuric then Tobye is sterile. Blue, inviting things are protecting. Tobye is turbinate.", "logic": "\nTurbinate(tobye)\nInviting(tobye)\nProtecting(tobye)\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Unsorted(x) -> Anuric(x))\nforall x (Protecting(x) and Incidental(x) -> Anuric(x))\nTurbinate(tobye) -> Incidental(tobye)\nforall x (Inviting(x) -> Turbinate(x))\nAnuric(tobye) -> Sterile(tobye)\nforall x (Turbinate(x) and Inviting(x) -> Protecting(x))\n\nTurbinate(tobye)\n\ntherefore Turbinate(tobye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Marie is tuxedoed. Marie is rational. Marie is everyday. All rational, attenuated things are affable. All everyday, brute things are affable. If Marie is tuxedoed then Marie is brute. If something is rational then it is tuxedoed. If Marie is affable then Marie is plural. Blue, rational things are everyday. Marie is not rational.", "logic": "\nTuxedoed(marie)\nRational(marie)\nEveryday(marie)\nforall x (Rational(x) and Attenuated(x) -> Affable(x))\nforall x (Everyday(x) and Brute(x) -> Affable(x))\nTuxedoed(marie) -> Brute(marie)\nforall x (Rational(x) -> Tuxedoed(x))\nAffable(marie) -> Plural(marie)\nforall x (Tuxedoed(x) and Rational(x) -> Everyday(x))\n\nnot Rational(marie)\n\ntherefore Rational(marie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Micki is categoric. Micki is unlikely. Micki is awninged. All unlikely, gloomful things are hotheaded. All awninged, fateful things are hotheaded. If Micki is categoric then Micki is fateful. If something is unlikely then it is categoric. If Micki is hotheaded then Micki is explicable. Blue, unlikely things are awninged. Micki is fateful.", "logic": "\nCategoric(micki)\nUnlikely(micki)\nAwninged(micki)\nforall x (Unlikely(x) and Gloomful(x) -> Hotheaded(x))\nforall x (Awninged(x) and Fateful(x) -> Hotheaded(x))\nCategoric(micki) -> Fateful(micki)\nforall x (Unlikely(x) -> Categoric(x))\nHotheaded(micki) -> Explicable(micki)\nforall x (Categoric(x) and Unlikely(x) -> Awninged(x))\n\nFateful(micki)\n\nCategoric(micki) and Categoric(micki) -> Fateful(micki) -> therefore Fateful(micki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Isidora is dosed. Isidora is activistic. Isidora is thankful. All activistic, desolate things are illusional. All thankful, gelid things are illusional. If Isidora is dosed then Isidora is gelid. If something is activistic then it is dosed. If Isidora is illusional then Isidora is ensiform. Blue, activistic things are thankful. Isidora is not gelid.", "logic": "\nDosed(isidora)\nActivistic(isidora)\nThankful(isidora)\nforall x (Activistic(x) and Desolate(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Thankful(x) and Gelid(x) -> Illusional(x))\nDosed(isidora) -> Gelid(isidora)\nforall x (Activistic(x) -> Dosed(x))\nIllusional(isidora) -> Ensiform(isidora)\nforall x (Dosed(x) and Activistic(x) -> Thankful(x))\n\nnot Gelid(isidora)\n\nDosed(isidora) and Dosed(isidora) -> Gelid(isidora) -> therefore Gelid(isidora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Catherin is custodial. Catherin is mitigable. Catherin is pedantic. All mitigable, newborn things are bismuthic. All pedantic, bastard things are bismuthic. If Catherin is custodial then Catherin is bastard. If something is mitigable then it is custodial. If Catherin is bismuthic then Catherin is chancy. Blue, mitigable things are pedantic. Catherin is bismuthic.", "logic": "\nCustodial(catherin)\nMitigable(catherin)\nPedantic(catherin)\nforall x (Mitigable(x) and Newborn(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) and Bastard(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nCustodial(catherin) -> Bastard(catherin)\nforall x (Mitigable(x) -> Custodial(x))\nBismuthic(catherin) -> Chancy(catherin)\nforall x (Custodial(x) and Mitigable(x) -> Pedantic(x))\n\nBismuthic(catherin)\n\nCustodial(catherin) and Custodial(catherin) -> Bastard(catherin) -> therefore Bastard(catherin) Pedantic(catherin) and Bastard(catherin) and forall x (Pedantic(x) and Bastard(x) -> Bismuthic(x)) -> therefore Bismuthic(catherin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Cookie is somber. Cookie is unadorned. Cookie is feisty. All unadorned, inordinate things are expiratory. All feisty, prognathic things are expiratory. If Cookie is somber then Cookie is prognathic. If something is unadorned then it is somber. If Cookie is expiratory then Cookie is wideband. Blue, unadorned things are feisty. Cookie is not expiratory.", "logic": "\nSomber(cookie)\nUnadorned(cookie)\nFeisty(cookie)\nforall x (Unadorned(x) and Inordinate(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nforall x (Feisty(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Expiratory(x))\nSomber(cookie) -> Prognathic(cookie)\nforall x (Unadorned(x) -> Somber(x))\nExpiratory(cookie) -> Wideband(cookie)\nforall x (Somber(x) and Unadorned(x) -> Feisty(x))\n\nnot Expiratory(cookie)\n\nSomber(cookie) and Somber(cookie) -> Prognathic(cookie) -> therefore Prognathic(cookie) Feisty(cookie) and Prognathic(cookie) and forall x (Feisty(x) and Prognathic(x) -> Expiratory(x)) -> therefore Expiratory(cookie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Gloriane is debile. Gloriane is ambiguous. Gloriane is thickened. All ambiguous, falcate things are holistic. All thickened, diplomatic things are holistic. If Gloriane is debile then Gloriane is diplomatic. If something is ambiguous then it is debile. If Gloriane is holistic then Gloriane is unbanded. Blue, ambiguous things are thickened. Gloriane is unbanded.", "logic": "\nDebile(gloriane)\nAmbiguous(gloriane)\nThickened(gloriane)\nforall x (Ambiguous(x) and Falcate(x) -> Holistic(x))\nforall x (Thickened(x) and Diplomatic(x) -> Holistic(x))\nDebile(gloriane) -> Diplomatic(gloriane)\nforall x (Ambiguous(x) -> Debile(x))\nHolistic(gloriane) -> Unbanded(gloriane)\nforall x (Debile(x) and Ambiguous(x) -> Thickened(x))\n\nUnbanded(gloriane)\n\nDebile(gloriane) and Debile(gloriane) -> Diplomatic(gloriane) -> therefore Diplomatic(gloriane) Thickened(gloriane) and Diplomatic(gloriane) and forall x (Thickened(x) and Diplomatic(x) -> Holistic(x)) -> therefore Holistic(gloriane) Holistic(gloriane) and Holistic(gloriane) -> Unbanded(gloriane) -> therefore Unbanded(gloriane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Elfie is epicene. Elfie is moderating. Elfie is shingly. All moderating, embolic things are underway. All shingly, hispid things are underway. If Elfie is epicene then Elfie is hispid. If something is moderating then it is epicene. If Elfie is underway then Elfie is fatuous. Blue, moderating things are shingly. Elfie is not fatuous.", "logic": "\nEpicene(elfie)\nModerating(elfie)\nShingly(elfie)\nforall x (Moderating(x) and Embolic(x) -> Underway(x))\nforall x (Shingly(x) and Hispid(x) -> Underway(x))\nEpicene(elfie) -> Hispid(elfie)\nforall x (Moderating(x) -> Epicene(x))\nUnderway(elfie) -> Fatuous(elfie)\nforall x (Epicene(x) and Moderating(x) -> Shingly(x))\n\nnot Fatuous(elfie)\n\nEpicene(elfie) and Epicene(elfie) -> Hispid(elfie) -> therefore Hispid(elfie) Shingly(elfie) and Hispid(elfie) and forall x (Shingly(x) and Hispid(x) -> Underway(x)) -> therefore Underway(elfie) Underway(elfie) and Underway(elfie) -> Fatuous(elfie) -> therefore Fatuous(elfie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-111"} {"premises": "Jephthah is undigested. Kimmo is not attacking. Veriee is rustproof. Whittaker is wintry. Round things are not serous. If something is serous and not rustproof then it is attacking. Young things are attacking. If something is undigested and wintry then it is rimless. All rustproof things are rimless. If something is attacking then it is wintry. If Whittaker is rimless and Whittaker is rustproof then Whittaker is wintry. If something is wintry and not serous then it is pederastic. Whittaker is wintry.", "logic": "\nUndigested(jephthah)\nnot Attacking(kimmo)\nRustproof(veriee)\nWintry(whittaker)\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> not Serous(x))\nforall x (Serous(x) and not Rustproof(x) -> Attacking(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Attacking(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) and Wintry(x) -> Rimless(x))\nforall x (Rustproof(x) -> Rimless(x))\nforall x (Attacking(x) -> Wintry(x))\nRimless(whittaker) and Rustproof(whittaker) -> Wintry(whittaker)\nforall x (Wintry(x) and not Serous(x) -> Pederastic(x))\n\nWintry(whittaker)\n\ntherefore Wintry(whittaker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Loraine is emeritus. Rolph is not fatigued. Ash is unassigned. Lemar is defeasible. Round things are not oblique. If something is oblique and not unassigned then it is fatigued. Young things are fatigued. If something is emeritus and defeasible then it is buccal. All unassigned things are buccal. If something is fatigued then it is defeasible. If Lemar is buccal and Lemar is unassigned then Lemar is defeasible. If something is defeasible and not oblique then it is jittering. Rolph is fatigued.", "logic": "\nEmeritus(loraine)\nnot Fatigued(rolph)\nUnassigned(ash)\nDefeasible(lemar)\nforall x (Buccal(x) -> not Oblique(x))\nforall x (Oblique(x) and not Unassigned(x) -> Fatigued(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> Fatigued(x))\nforall x (Emeritus(x) and Defeasible(x) -> Buccal(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> Buccal(x))\nforall x (Fatigued(x) -> Defeasible(x))\nBuccal(lemar) and Unassigned(lemar) -> Defeasible(lemar)\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and not Oblique(x) -> Jittering(x))\n\nFatigued(rolph)\n\ntherefore not Fatigued(rolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Ralf is tops. Margette is not exoergic. Pam is jewish. Ruthe is dyslectic. Round things are not medial. If something is medial and not jewish then it is exoergic. Young things are exoergic. If something is tops and dyslectic then it is fistulous. All jewish things are fistulous. If something is exoergic then it is dyslectic. If Ruthe is fistulous and Ruthe is jewish then Ruthe is dyslectic. If something is dyslectic and not medial then it is dietary. Pam is fistulous.", "logic": "\nTops(ralf)\nnot Exoergic(margette)\nJewish(pam)\nDyslectic(ruthe)\nforall x (Fistulous(x) -> not Medial(x))\nforall x (Medial(x) and not Jewish(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Jewish(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nforall x (Tops(x) and Dyslectic(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Jewish(x) -> Fistulous(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Dyslectic(x))\nFistulous(ruthe) and Jewish(ruthe) -> Dyslectic(ruthe)\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) and not Medial(x) -> Dietary(x))\n\nFistulous(pam)\n\nJewish(pam) and forall x (Jewish(x) -> Fistulous(x)) -> therefore Fistulous(pam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Cristabel is idiomatic. Mike is not tiddly. Olivia is pareve. Yvonne is fractious. Round things are not oncologic. If something is oncologic and not pareve then it is tiddly. Young things are tiddly. If something is idiomatic and fractious then it is unimpaired. All pareve things are unimpaired. If something is tiddly then it is fractious. If Yvonne is unimpaired and Yvonne is pareve then Yvonne is fractious. If something is fractious and not oncologic then it is sterling. Olivia is not tiddly.", "logic": "\nIdiomatic(cristabel)\nnot Tiddly(mike)\nPareve(olivia)\nFractious(yvonne)\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) -> not Oncologic(x))\nforall x (Oncologic(x) and not Pareve(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Tiddly(x))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) and Fractious(x) -> Unimpaired(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) -> Unimpaired(x))\nforall x (Tiddly(x) -> Fractious(x))\nUnimpaired(yvonne) and Pareve(yvonne) -> Fractious(yvonne)\nforall x (Fractious(x) and not Oncologic(x) -> Sterling(x))\n\nnot Tiddly(olivia)\n\nPareve(olivia) and forall x (Pareve(x) -> Tiddly(x)) -> therefore Tiddly(olivia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Magdaia is curtained. Addis is not virtual. Ingaberg is hornlike. Ginelle is lowbred. Round things are not baptismal. If something is baptismal and not hornlike then it is virtual. Young things are virtual. If something is curtained and lowbred then it is staged. All hornlike things are staged. If something is virtual then it is lowbred. If Ginelle is staged and Ginelle is hornlike then Ginelle is lowbred. If something is lowbred and not baptismal then it is fallow. Ingaberg is lowbred.", "logic": "\nCurtained(magdaia)\nnot Virtual(addis)\nHornlike(ingaberg)\nLowbred(ginelle)\nforall x (Staged(x) -> not Baptismal(x))\nforall x (Baptismal(x) and not Hornlike(x) -> Virtual(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) -> Virtual(x))\nforall x (Curtained(x) and Lowbred(x) -> Staged(x))\nforall x (Hornlike(x) -> Staged(x))\nforall x (Virtual(x) -> Lowbred(x))\nStaged(ginelle) and Hornlike(ginelle) -> Lowbred(ginelle)\nforall x (Lowbred(x) and not Baptismal(x) -> Fallow(x))\n\nLowbred(ingaberg)\n\nHornlike(ingaberg) and forall x (Hornlike(x) -> Virtual(x)) -> therefore Virtual(ingaberg) Virtual(ingaberg) and forall x (Virtual(x) -> Lowbred(x)) -> therefore Lowbred(ingaberg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Gene is godly. Verina is not egyptian. Marja is juicy. Jehu is fogged. Round things are not unspecific. If something is unspecific and not juicy then it is egyptian. Young things are egyptian. If something is godly and fogged then it is pyrogenous. All juicy things are pyrogenous. If something is egyptian then it is fogged. If Jehu is pyrogenous and Jehu is juicy then Jehu is fogged. If something is fogged and not unspecific then it is echoing. Marja is not fogged.", "logic": "\nGodly(gene)\nnot Egyptian(verina)\nJuicy(marja)\nFogged(jehu)\nforall x (Pyrogenous(x) -> not Unspecific(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) and not Juicy(x) -> Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Juicy(x) -> Egyptian(x))\nforall x (Godly(x) and Fogged(x) -> Pyrogenous(x))\nforall x (Juicy(x) -> Pyrogenous(x))\nforall x (Egyptian(x) -> Fogged(x))\nPyrogenous(jehu) and Juicy(jehu) -> Fogged(jehu)\nforall x (Fogged(x) and not Unspecific(x) -> Echoing(x))\n\nnot Fogged(marja)\n\nJuicy(marja) and forall x (Juicy(x) -> Egyptian(x)) -> therefore Egyptian(marja) Egyptian(marja) and forall x (Egyptian(x) -> Fogged(x)) -> therefore Fogged(marja)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Jennifer is telescoped. Halimeda is not derogatory. Perri is groggy. Benn is southmost. Round things are not unfrosted. If something is unfrosted and not groggy then it is derogatory. Young things are derogatory. If something is telescoped and southmost then it is colicky. All groggy things are colicky. If something is derogatory then it is southmost. If Benn is colicky and Benn is groggy then Benn is southmost. If something is southmost and not unfrosted then it is intrastate. Perri is intrastate.", "logic": "\nTelescoped(jennifer)\nnot Derogatory(halimeda)\nGroggy(perri)\nSouthmost(benn)\nforall x (Colicky(x) -> not Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) and not Groggy(x) -> Derogatory(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) -> Derogatory(x))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) and Southmost(x) -> Colicky(x))\nforall x (Groggy(x) -> Colicky(x))\nforall x (Derogatory(x) -> Southmost(x))\nColicky(benn) and Groggy(benn) -> Southmost(benn)\nforall x (Southmost(x) and not Unfrosted(x) -> Intrastate(x))\n\nIntrastate(perri)\n\nGroggy(perri) and forall x (Groggy(x) -> Derogatory(x)) -> therefore Derogatory(perri) Derogatory(perri) and forall x (Derogatory(x) -> Southmost(x)) -> therefore Southmost(perri) Groggy(perri) and forall x (Groggy(x) -> Colicky(x)) -> therefore Colicky(perri) Colicky(perri) and forall x (Colicky(x) -> not Unfrosted(x)) -> therefore not Unfrosted(perri) Southmost(perri) and not Unfrosted(perri) and forall x (Southmost(x) and not Unfrosted(x) -> Intrastate(x)) -> therefore Intrastate(perri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Merissa is manx. Kimmy is not sufficient. Rudiger is diffusive. Frances is quintuple. Round things are not payable. If something is payable and not diffusive then it is sufficient. Young things are sufficient. If something is manx and quintuple then it is basipetal. All diffusive things are basipetal. If something is sufficient then it is quintuple. If Frances is basipetal and Frances is diffusive then Frances is quintuple. If something is quintuple and not payable then it is forgiving. Rudiger is not forgiving.", "logic": "\nManx(merissa)\nnot Sufficient(kimmy)\nDiffusive(rudiger)\nQuintuple(frances)\nforall x (Basipetal(x) -> not Payable(x))\nforall x (Payable(x) and not Diffusive(x) -> Sufficient(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) -> Sufficient(x))\nforall x (Manx(x) and Quintuple(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Diffusive(x) -> Basipetal(x))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) -> Quintuple(x))\nBasipetal(frances) and Diffusive(frances) -> Quintuple(frances)\nforall x (Quintuple(x) and not Payable(x) -> Forgiving(x))\n\nnot Forgiving(rudiger)\n\nDiffusive(rudiger) and forall x (Diffusive(x) -> Sufficient(x)) -> therefore Sufficient(rudiger) Sufficient(rudiger) and forall x (Sufficient(x) -> Quintuple(x)) -> therefore Quintuple(rudiger) Diffusive(rudiger) and forall x (Diffusive(x) -> Basipetal(x)) -> therefore Basipetal(rudiger) Basipetal(rudiger) and forall x (Basipetal(x) -> not Payable(x)) -> therefore not Payable(rudiger) Quintuple(rudiger) and not Payable(rudiger) and forall x (Quintuple(x) and not Payable(x) -> Forgiving(x)) -> therefore Forgiving(rudiger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Berget is continued. Clair is not likely. Coreen is distal. Wain is encyclical. Round things are not attended. If something is attended and not distal then it is likely. Young things are likely. If something is continued and encyclical then it is unfattened. All distal things are unfattened. If something is likely then it is encyclical. If Wain is unfattened and Wain is distal then Wain is encyclical. If something is encyclical and not attended then it is slovenian. Wain is not likely.", "logic": "\nContinued(berget)\nnot Likely(clair)\nDistal(coreen)\nEncyclical(wain)\nforall x (Unfattened(x) -> not Attended(x))\nforall x (Attended(x) and not Distal(x) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Distal(x) -> Likely(x))\nforall x (Continued(x) and Encyclical(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nforall x (Distal(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nforall x (Likely(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nUnfattened(wain) and Distal(wain) -> Encyclical(wain)\nforall x (Encyclical(x) and not Attended(x) -> Slovenian(x))\n\nnot Likely(wain)\n\nforall x (Attended(x) and not Distal(x) -> Likely(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Alyson is terrific. Toby is not sneak. Rozina is leisurely. Sander is fancied. Round things are not envious. If something is envious and not leisurely then it is sneak. Young things are sneak. If something is terrific and fancied then it is rarefied. All leisurely things are rarefied. If something is sneak then it is fancied. If Sander is rarefied and Sander is leisurely then Sander is fancied. If something is fancied and not envious then it is whacked. Sander is rarefied.", "logic": "\nTerrific(alyson)\nnot Sneak(toby)\nLeisurely(rozina)\nFancied(sander)\nforall x (Rarefied(x) -> not Envious(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) and not Leisurely(x) -> Sneak(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Sneak(x))\nforall x (Terrific(x) and Fancied(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Sneak(x) -> Fancied(x))\nRarefied(sander) and Leisurely(sander) -> Fancied(sander)\nforall x (Fancied(x) and not Envious(x) -> Whacked(x))\n\nRarefied(sander)\n\nforall x (Terrific(x) and Fancied(x) -> Rarefied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Halvard is squelched. Ferinand is not egoistic. Cordelia is topical. Algernon is fetid. Round things are not feculent. If something is feculent and not topical then it is egoistic. Young things are egoistic. If something is squelched and fetid then it is clitoral. All topical things are clitoral. If something is egoistic then it is fetid. If Algernon is clitoral and Algernon is topical then Algernon is fetid. If something is fetid and not feculent then it is composed. Halvard is not fetid.", "logic": "\nSquelched(halvard)\nnot Egoistic(ferinand)\nTopical(cordelia)\nFetid(algernon)\nforall x (Clitoral(x) -> not Feculent(x))\nforall x (Feculent(x) and not Topical(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Squelched(x) and Fetid(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Fetid(x))\nClitoral(algernon) and Topical(algernon) -> Fetid(algernon)\nforall x (Fetid(x) and not Feculent(x) -> Composed(x))\n\nnot Fetid(halvard)\n\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Fetid(x)) <- forall x (Feculent(x) and not Topical(x) -> Egoistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Kellie is untenanted. Evan is not overheated. Sherri is mouselike. Horatia is clxx. Round things are not squeaking. If something is squeaking and not mouselike then it is overheated. Young things are overheated. If something is untenanted and clxx then it is alto. All mouselike things are alto. If something is overheated then it is clxx. If Horatia is alto and Horatia is mouselike then Horatia is clxx. If something is clxx and not squeaking then it is quack. Horatia is quack.", "logic": "\nUntenanted(kellie)\nnot Overheated(evan)\nMouselike(sherri)\nClxx(horatia)\nforall x (Alto(x) -> not Squeaking(x))\nforall x (Squeaking(x) and not Mouselike(x) -> Overheated(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Overheated(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) and Clxx(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Alto(x))\nforall x (Overheated(x) -> Clxx(x))\nAlto(horatia) and Mouselike(horatia) -> Clxx(horatia)\nforall x (Clxx(x) and not Squeaking(x) -> Quack(x))\n\nQuack(horatia)\n\nforall x (Clxx(x) and not Squeaking(x) -> Quack(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Theo is commodious. Pooh is not nonskid. Lauretta is seasick. Carlotta is opened. Round things are not dummy. If something is dummy and not seasick then it is nonskid. Young things are nonskid. If something is commodious and opened then it is garmented. All seasick things are garmented. If something is nonskid then it is opened. If Carlotta is garmented and Carlotta is seasick then Carlotta is opened. If something is opened and not dummy then it is unquiet. Pooh is not commodious.", "logic": "\nCommodious(theo)\nnot Nonskid(pooh)\nSeasick(lauretta)\nOpened(carlotta)\nforall x (Garmented(x) -> not Dummy(x))\nforall x (Dummy(x) and not Seasick(x) -> Nonskid(x))\nforall x (Seasick(x) -> Nonskid(x))\nforall x (Commodious(x) and Opened(x) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Seasick(x) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Opened(x))\nGarmented(carlotta) and Seasick(carlotta) -> Opened(carlotta)\nforall x (Opened(x) and not Dummy(x) -> Unquiet(x))\n\nnot Commodious(pooh)\n\nnot Commodious(pooh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Willdon is slivery. Pavla is not semestral. Waldon is marsupial. Nonnah is wrongful. Round things are not tabu. If something is tabu and not marsupial then it is semestral. Young things are semestral. If something is slivery and wrongful then it is unseamed. All marsupial things are unseamed. If something is semestral then it is wrongful. If Nonnah is unseamed and Nonnah is marsupial then Nonnah is wrongful. If something is wrongful and not tabu then it is errant. Pavla is tabu.", "logic": "\nSlivery(willdon)\nnot Semestral(pavla)\nMarsupial(waldon)\nWrongful(nonnah)\nforall x (Unseamed(x) -> not Tabu(x))\nforall x (Tabu(x) and not Marsupial(x) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Marsupial(x) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) and Wrongful(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Marsupial(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Semestral(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nUnseamed(nonnah) and Marsupial(nonnah) -> Wrongful(nonnah)\nforall x (Wrongful(x) and not Tabu(x) -> Errant(x))\n\nTabu(pavla)\n\nTabu(pavla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Viki is sequined. Zelma is not angular. Kerstin is matutinal. Katti is expository. Round things are not barreled. If something is barreled and not matutinal then it is angular. Young things are angular. If something is sequined and expository then it is inspired. All matutinal things are inspired. If something is angular then it is expository. If Katti is inspired and Katti is matutinal then Katti is expository. If something is expository and not barreled then it is motile. Zelma is not matutinal.", "logic": "\nSequined(viki)\nnot Angular(zelma)\nMatutinal(kerstin)\nExpository(katti)\nforall x (Inspired(x) -> not Barreled(x))\nforall x (Barreled(x) and not Matutinal(x) -> Angular(x))\nforall x (Matutinal(x) -> Angular(x))\nforall x (Sequined(x) and Expository(x) -> Inspired(x))\nforall x (Matutinal(x) -> Inspired(x))\nforall x (Angular(x) -> Expository(x))\nInspired(katti) and Matutinal(katti) -> Expository(katti)\nforall x (Expository(x) and not Barreled(x) -> Motile(x))\n\nnot Matutinal(zelma)\n\nnot Matutinal(zelma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "Felicity is palmy. Brietta is not forte. Julio is fungoid. Jerald is nonstop. Round things are not apsidal. If something is apsidal and not fungoid then it is forte. Young things are forte. If something is palmy and nonstop then it is disjointed. All fungoid things are disjointed. If something is forte then it is nonstop. If Jerald is disjointed and Jerald is fungoid then Jerald is nonstop. If something is nonstop and not apsidal then it is surpassing. Felicity is fungoid.", "logic": "\nPalmy(felicity)\nnot Forte(brietta)\nFungoid(julio)\nNonstop(jerald)\nforall x (Disjointed(x) -> not Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Apsidal(x) and not Fungoid(x) -> Forte(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) -> Forte(x))\nforall x (Palmy(x) and Nonstop(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) -> Disjointed(x))\nforall x (Forte(x) -> Nonstop(x))\nDisjointed(jerald) and Fungoid(jerald) -> Nonstop(jerald)\nforall x (Nonstop(x) and not Apsidal(x) -> Surpassing(x))\n\nFungoid(felicity)\n\nFungoid(felicity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1215"} {"premises": "The flin scraunch the corenda. The flin is automated. The flin is not sonic. The flin underline the darline. The flin underline the corenda. The flin heave the darline. The flin heave the corenda. The darline scraunch the flin. The darline scraunch the corenda. The darline is tragicomic. The corenda scraunch the darline. The corenda is tragicomic. The corenda is not optimistic. The corenda underline the flin. The corenda does not like the darline. The corenda does not see the flin. If the corenda scraunch the flin then the corenda heave the darline. If the darline scraunch the flin then the flin is automated. If something is sonic then it heave the corenda. If the flin scraunch the corenda then the corenda is not optimistic. If something heave the corenda then it is tutorial. If something underline the darline then the darline is sonic. If something underline the flin then it is not sonic. If the flin heave the darline then the flin heave the corenda. The corenda underline the flin.", "logic": "\nScraunch(flin, corenda)\nAutomated(flin)\nnot Sonic(flin)\nUnderline(flin, darline)\nUnderline(flin, corenda)\nHeave(flin, darline)\nHeave(flin, corenda)\nScraunch(darline, flin)\nScraunch(darline, corenda)\nTragicomic(darline)\nScraunch(corenda, darline)\nTragicomic(corenda)\nnot Optimistic(corenda)\nUnderline(corenda, flin)\nnot Underline(corenda, darline)\nnot Heave(corenda, flin)\nScraunch(corenda, flin) -> Heave(corenda, darline)\nScraunch(darline, flin) -> Automated(flin)\nforall x (Sonic(x) -> Heave(x, corenda))\nScraunch(flin, corenda) -> not Optimistic(corenda)\nforall x (Heave(x, corenda) -> Tutorial(x))\nforall x (Underline(x, darline) -> Sonic(darline))\nforall x (Underline(x, flin) -> not Sonic(x))\nHeave(flin, darline) -> Heave(flin, corenda)\n\nUnderline(corenda, flin)\n\ntherefore Underline(corenda, flin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The farah tether the ezra. The farah is systematic. The farah is not pianistic. The farah foot the dea. The farah foot the ezra. The farah shellack the dea. The farah shellack the ezra. The dea tether the farah. The dea tether the ezra. The dea is unfastened. The ezra tether the dea. The ezra is unfastened. The ezra is not irritable. The ezra foot the farah. The ezra does not like the dea. The ezra does not see the farah. If the ezra tether the farah then the ezra shellack the dea. If the dea tether the farah then the farah is systematic. If something is pianistic then it shellack the ezra. If the farah tether the ezra then the ezra is not irritable. If something shellack the ezra then it is believable. If something foot the dea then the dea is pianistic. If something foot the farah then it is not pianistic. If the farah shellack the dea then the farah shellack the ezra. The farah is pianistic.", "logic": "\nTether(farah, ezra)\nSystematic(farah)\nnot Pianistic(farah)\nFoot(farah, dea)\nFoot(farah, ezra)\nShellack(farah, dea)\nShellack(farah, ezra)\nTether(dea, farah)\nTether(dea, ezra)\nUnfastened(dea)\nTether(ezra, dea)\nUnfastened(ezra)\nnot Irritable(ezra)\nFoot(ezra, farah)\nnot Foot(ezra, dea)\nnot Shellack(ezra, farah)\nTether(ezra, farah) -> Shellack(ezra, dea)\nTether(dea, farah) -> Systematic(farah)\nforall x (Pianistic(x) -> Shellack(x, ezra))\nTether(farah, ezra) -> not Irritable(ezra)\nforall x (Shellack(x, ezra) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Foot(x, dea) -> Pianistic(dea))\nforall x (Foot(x, farah) -> not Pianistic(x))\nShellack(farah, dea) -> Shellack(farah, ezra)\n\nPianistic(farah)\n\ntherefore not Pianistic(farah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The modesta steepen the marlowe. The modesta is strange. The modesta is not nativist. The modesta chastise the althea. The modesta chastise the marlowe. The modesta circle the althea. The modesta circle the marlowe. The althea steepen the modesta. The althea steepen the marlowe. The althea is squint. The marlowe steepen the althea. The marlowe is squint. The marlowe is not hourlong. The marlowe chastise the modesta. The marlowe does not like the althea. The marlowe does not see the modesta. If the marlowe steepen the modesta then the marlowe circle the althea. If the althea steepen the modesta then the modesta is strange. If something is nativist then it circle the marlowe. If the modesta steepen the marlowe then the marlowe is not hourlong. If something circle the marlowe then it is syncarpous. If something chastise the althea then the althea is nativist. If something chastise the modesta then it is not nativist. If the modesta circle the althea then the modesta circle the marlowe. The marlowe is not nativist.", "logic": "\nSteepen(modesta, marlowe)\nStrange(modesta)\nnot Nativist(modesta)\nChastise(modesta, althea)\nChastise(modesta, marlowe)\nCircle(modesta, althea)\nCircle(modesta, marlowe)\nSteepen(althea, modesta)\nSteepen(althea, marlowe)\nSquint(althea)\nSteepen(marlowe, althea)\nSquint(marlowe)\nnot Hourlong(marlowe)\nChastise(marlowe, modesta)\nnot Chastise(marlowe, althea)\nnot Circle(marlowe, modesta)\nSteepen(marlowe, modesta) -> Circle(marlowe, althea)\nSteepen(althea, modesta) -> Strange(modesta)\nforall x (Nativist(x) -> Circle(x, marlowe))\nSteepen(modesta, marlowe) -> not Hourlong(marlowe)\nforall x (Circle(x, marlowe) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Chastise(x, althea) -> Nativist(althea))\nforall x (Chastise(x, modesta) -> not Nativist(x))\nCircle(modesta, althea) -> Circle(modesta, marlowe)\n\nnot Nativist(marlowe)\n\nChastise(marlowe, modesta) and forall x (Chastise(x, modesta) -> not Nativist(x)) -> therefore not Nativist(marlowe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The chelton travel the rae. The chelton is drupaceous. The chelton is not infrahuman. The chelton engender the tiler. The chelton engender the rae. The chelton unmask the tiler. The chelton unmask the rae. The tiler travel the chelton. The tiler travel the rae. The tiler is canicular. The rae travel the tiler. The rae is canicular. The rae is not astir. The rae engender the chelton. The rae does not like the tiler. The rae does not see the chelton. If the rae travel the chelton then the rae unmask the tiler. If the tiler travel the chelton then the chelton is drupaceous. If something is infrahuman then it unmask the rae. If the chelton travel the rae then the rae is not astir. If something unmask the rae then it is duple. If something engender the tiler then the tiler is infrahuman. If something engender the chelton then it is not infrahuman. If the chelton unmask the tiler then the chelton unmask the rae. The chelton is not duple.", "logic": "\nTravel(chelton, rae)\nDrupaceous(chelton)\nnot Infrahuman(chelton)\nEngender(chelton, tiler)\nEngender(chelton, rae)\nUnmask(chelton, tiler)\nUnmask(chelton, rae)\nTravel(tiler, chelton)\nTravel(tiler, rae)\nCanicular(tiler)\nTravel(rae, tiler)\nCanicular(rae)\nnot Astir(rae)\nEngender(rae, chelton)\nnot Engender(rae, tiler)\nnot Unmask(rae, chelton)\nTravel(rae, chelton) -> Unmask(rae, tiler)\nTravel(tiler, chelton) -> Drupaceous(chelton)\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Unmask(x, rae))\nTravel(chelton, rae) -> not Astir(rae)\nforall x (Unmask(x, rae) -> Duple(x))\nforall x (Engender(x, tiler) -> Infrahuman(tiler))\nforall x (Engender(x, chelton) -> not Infrahuman(x))\nUnmask(chelton, tiler) -> Unmask(chelton, rae)\n\nnot Duple(chelton)\n\nUnmask(chelton, rae) and forall x (Unmask(x, rae) -> Duple(x)) -> therefore Duple(chelton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The charil mousse the lelah. The charil is ruly. The charil is not express. The charil broider the delinda. The charil broider the lelah. The charil blackwash the delinda. The charil blackwash the lelah. The delinda mousse the charil. The delinda mousse the lelah. The delinda is cinerary. The lelah mousse the delinda. The lelah is cinerary. The lelah is not capped. The lelah broider the charil. The lelah does not like the delinda. The lelah does not see the charil. If the lelah mousse the charil then the lelah blackwash the delinda. If the delinda mousse the charil then the charil is ruly. If something is express then it blackwash the lelah. If the charil mousse the lelah then the lelah is not capped. If something blackwash the lelah then it is trillion. If something broider the delinda then the delinda is express. If something broider the charil then it is not express. If the charil blackwash the delinda then the charil blackwash the lelah. The delinda blackwash the lelah.", "logic": "\nMousse(charil, lelah)\nRuly(charil)\nnot Express(charil)\nBroider(charil, delinda)\nBroider(charil, lelah)\nBlackwash(charil, delinda)\nBlackwash(charil, lelah)\nMousse(delinda, charil)\nMousse(delinda, lelah)\nCinerary(delinda)\nMousse(lelah, delinda)\nCinerary(lelah)\nnot Capped(lelah)\nBroider(lelah, charil)\nnot Broider(lelah, delinda)\nnot Blackwash(lelah, charil)\nMousse(lelah, charil) -> Blackwash(lelah, delinda)\nMousse(delinda, charil) -> Ruly(charil)\nforall x (Express(x) -> Blackwash(x, lelah))\nMousse(charil, lelah) -> not Capped(lelah)\nforall x (Blackwash(x, lelah) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Broider(x, delinda) -> Express(delinda))\nforall x (Broider(x, charil) -> not Express(x))\nBlackwash(charil, delinda) -> Blackwash(charil, lelah)\n\nBlackwash(delinda, lelah)\n\nBroider(charil, delinda) and forall x (Broider(x, delinda) -> Express(delinda)) -> therefore Express(delinda) Express(delinda) and forall x (Express(x) -> Blackwash(x, lelah)) -> therefore Blackwash(delinda, lelah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The celeste scruple the shamit. The celeste is annulate. The celeste is not cambrian. The celeste microwave the neilla. The celeste microwave the shamit. The celeste ionise the neilla. The celeste ionise the shamit. The neilla scruple the celeste. The neilla scruple the shamit. The neilla is held. The shamit scruple the neilla. The shamit is held. The shamit is not rending. The shamit microwave the celeste. The shamit does not like the neilla. The shamit does not see the celeste. If the shamit scruple the celeste then the shamit ionise the neilla. If the neilla scruple the celeste then the celeste is annulate. If something is cambrian then it ionise the shamit. If the celeste scruple the shamit then the shamit is not rending. If something ionise the shamit then it is bareheaded. If something microwave the neilla then the neilla is cambrian. If something microwave the celeste then it is not cambrian. If the celeste ionise the neilla then the celeste ionise the shamit. The neilla does not see the shamit.", "logic": "\nScruple(celeste, shamit)\nAnnulate(celeste)\nnot Cambrian(celeste)\nMicrowave(celeste, neilla)\nMicrowave(celeste, shamit)\nIonise(celeste, neilla)\nIonise(celeste, shamit)\nScruple(neilla, celeste)\nScruple(neilla, shamit)\nHeld(neilla)\nScruple(shamit, neilla)\nHeld(shamit)\nnot Rending(shamit)\nMicrowave(shamit, celeste)\nnot Microwave(shamit, neilla)\nnot Ionise(shamit, celeste)\nScruple(shamit, celeste) -> Ionise(shamit, neilla)\nScruple(neilla, celeste) -> Annulate(celeste)\nforall x (Cambrian(x) -> Ionise(x, shamit))\nScruple(celeste, shamit) -> not Rending(shamit)\nforall x (Ionise(x, shamit) -> Bareheaded(x))\nforall x (Microwave(x, neilla) -> Cambrian(neilla))\nforall x (Microwave(x, celeste) -> not Cambrian(x))\nIonise(celeste, neilla) -> Ionise(celeste, shamit)\n\nnot Ionise(neilla, shamit)\n\nMicrowave(celeste, neilla) and forall x (Microwave(x, neilla) -> Cambrian(neilla)) -> therefore Cambrian(neilla) Cambrian(neilla) and forall x (Cambrian(x) -> Ionise(x, shamit)) -> therefore Ionise(neilla, shamit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The thibaut tune the giovanni. The thibaut is indecisive. The thibaut is not agrarian. The thibaut negative the antonino. The thibaut negative the giovanni. The thibaut inflect the antonino. The thibaut inflect the giovanni. The antonino tune the thibaut. The antonino tune the giovanni. The antonino is apothecial. The giovanni tune the antonino. The giovanni is apothecial. The giovanni is not touchy. The giovanni negative the thibaut. The giovanni does not like the antonino. The giovanni does not see the thibaut. If the giovanni tune the thibaut then the giovanni inflect the antonino. If the antonino tune the thibaut then the thibaut is indecisive. If something is agrarian then it inflect the giovanni. If the thibaut tune the giovanni then the giovanni is not touchy. If something inflect the giovanni then it is elapsed. If something negative the antonino then the antonino is agrarian. If something negative the thibaut then it is not agrarian. If the thibaut inflect the antonino then the thibaut inflect the giovanni. The antonino is elapsed.", "logic": "\nTune(thibaut, giovanni)\nIndecisive(thibaut)\nnot Agrarian(thibaut)\nNegative(thibaut, antonino)\nNegative(thibaut, giovanni)\nInflect(thibaut, antonino)\nInflect(thibaut, giovanni)\nTune(antonino, thibaut)\nTune(antonino, giovanni)\nApothecial(antonino)\nTune(giovanni, antonino)\nApothecial(giovanni)\nnot Touchy(giovanni)\nNegative(giovanni, thibaut)\nnot Negative(giovanni, antonino)\nnot Inflect(giovanni, thibaut)\nTune(giovanni, thibaut) -> Inflect(giovanni, antonino)\nTune(antonino, thibaut) -> Indecisive(thibaut)\nforall x (Agrarian(x) -> Inflect(x, giovanni))\nTune(thibaut, giovanni) -> not Touchy(giovanni)\nforall x (Inflect(x, giovanni) -> Elapsed(x))\nforall x (Negative(x, antonino) -> Agrarian(antonino))\nforall x (Negative(x, thibaut) -> not Agrarian(x))\nInflect(thibaut, antonino) -> Inflect(thibaut, giovanni)\n\nElapsed(antonino)\n\nNegative(thibaut, antonino) and forall x (Negative(x, antonino) -> Agrarian(antonino)) -> therefore Agrarian(antonino) Agrarian(antonino) and forall x (Agrarian(x) -> Inflect(x, giovanni)) -> therefore Inflect(antonino, giovanni) Inflect(antonino, giovanni) and forall x (Inflect(x, giovanni) -> Elapsed(x)) -> therefore Elapsed(antonino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The hayden sublime the rudiger. The hayden is receivable. The hayden is not silent. The hayden smelt the glynnis. The hayden smelt the rudiger. The hayden even the glynnis. The hayden even the rudiger. The glynnis sublime the hayden. The glynnis sublime the rudiger. The glynnis is baleful. The rudiger sublime the glynnis. The rudiger is baleful. The rudiger is not arid. The rudiger smelt the hayden. The rudiger does not like the glynnis. The rudiger does not see the hayden. If the rudiger sublime the hayden then the rudiger even the glynnis. If the glynnis sublime the hayden then the hayden is receivable. If something is silent then it even the rudiger. If the hayden sublime the rudiger then the rudiger is not arid. If something even the rudiger then it is brindled. If something smelt the glynnis then the glynnis is silent. If something smelt the hayden then it is not silent. If the hayden even the glynnis then the hayden even the rudiger. The glynnis is not brindled.", "logic": "\nSublime(hayden, rudiger)\nReceivable(hayden)\nnot Silent(hayden)\nSmelt(hayden, glynnis)\nSmelt(hayden, rudiger)\nEven(hayden, glynnis)\nEven(hayden, rudiger)\nSublime(glynnis, hayden)\nSublime(glynnis, rudiger)\nBaleful(glynnis)\nSublime(rudiger, glynnis)\nBaleful(rudiger)\nnot Arid(rudiger)\nSmelt(rudiger, hayden)\nnot Smelt(rudiger, glynnis)\nnot Even(rudiger, hayden)\nSublime(rudiger, hayden) -> Even(rudiger, glynnis)\nSublime(glynnis, hayden) -> Receivable(hayden)\nforall x (Silent(x) -> Even(x, rudiger))\nSublime(hayden, rudiger) -> not Arid(rudiger)\nforall x (Even(x, rudiger) -> Brindled(x))\nforall x (Smelt(x, glynnis) -> Silent(glynnis))\nforall x (Smelt(x, hayden) -> not Silent(x))\nEven(hayden, glynnis) -> Even(hayden, rudiger)\n\nnot Brindled(glynnis)\n\nSmelt(hayden, glynnis) and forall x (Smelt(x, glynnis) -> Silent(glynnis)) -> therefore Silent(glynnis) Silent(glynnis) and forall x (Silent(x) -> Even(x, rudiger)) -> therefore Even(glynnis, rudiger) Even(glynnis, rudiger) and forall x (Even(x, rudiger) -> Brindled(x)) -> therefore Brindled(glynnis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The mace pommel the prisca. The mace is astir. The mace is not smaller. The mace medicine the ailyn. The mace medicine the prisca. The mace resew the ailyn. The mace resew the prisca. The ailyn pommel the mace. The ailyn pommel the prisca. The ailyn is caecilian. The prisca pommel the ailyn. The prisca is caecilian. The prisca is not abatic. The prisca medicine the mace. The prisca does not like the ailyn. The prisca does not see the mace. If the prisca pommel the mace then the prisca resew the ailyn. If the ailyn pommel the mace then the mace is astir. If something is smaller then it resew the prisca. If the mace pommel the prisca then the prisca is not abatic. If something resew the prisca then it is mindful. If something medicine the ailyn then the ailyn is smaller. If something medicine the mace then it is not smaller. If the mace resew the ailyn then the mace resew the prisca. The prisca is not mindful.", "logic": "\nPommel(mace, prisca)\nAstir(mace)\nnot Smaller(mace)\nMedicine(mace, ailyn)\nMedicine(mace, prisca)\nResew(mace, ailyn)\nResew(mace, prisca)\nPommel(ailyn, mace)\nPommel(ailyn, prisca)\nCaecilian(ailyn)\nPommel(prisca, ailyn)\nCaecilian(prisca)\nnot Abatic(prisca)\nMedicine(prisca, mace)\nnot Medicine(prisca, ailyn)\nnot Resew(prisca, mace)\nPommel(prisca, mace) -> Resew(prisca, ailyn)\nPommel(ailyn, mace) -> Astir(mace)\nforall x (Smaller(x) -> Resew(x, prisca))\nPommel(mace, prisca) -> not Abatic(prisca)\nforall x (Resew(x, prisca) -> Mindful(x))\nforall x (Medicine(x, ailyn) -> Smaller(ailyn))\nforall x (Medicine(x, mace) -> not Smaller(x))\nResew(mace, ailyn) -> Resew(mace, prisca)\n\nnot Mindful(prisca)\n\nforall x (Resew(x, prisca) -> Mindful(x)) <- forall x (Smaller(x) -> Resew(x, prisca)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The pepillo autotomize the freida. The pepillo is maniacal. The pepillo is not overgreedy. The pepillo control the edie. The pepillo control the freida. The pepillo nosedive the edie. The pepillo nosedive the freida. The edie autotomize the pepillo. The edie autotomize the freida. The edie is slaphappy. The freida autotomize the edie. The freida is slaphappy. The freida is not handless. The freida control the pepillo. The freida does not like the edie. The freida does not see the pepillo. If the freida autotomize the pepillo then the freida nosedive the edie. If the edie autotomize the pepillo then the pepillo is maniacal. If something is overgreedy then it nosedive the freida. If the pepillo autotomize the freida then the freida is not handless. If something nosedive the freida then it is carbonyl. If something control the edie then the edie is overgreedy. If something control the pepillo then it is not overgreedy. If the pepillo nosedive the edie then the pepillo nosedive the freida. The freida nosedive the freida.", "logic": "\nAutotomize(pepillo, freida)\nManiacal(pepillo)\nnot Overgreedy(pepillo)\nControl(pepillo, edie)\nControl(pepillo, freida)\nNosedive(pepillo, edie)\nNosedive(pepillo, freida)\nAutotomize(edie, pepillo)\nAutotomize(edie, freida)\nSlaphappy(edie)\nAutotomize(freida, edie)\nSlaphappy(freida)\nnot Handless(freida)\nControl(freida, pepillo)\nnot Control(freida, edie)\nnot Nosedive(freida, pepillo)\nAutotomize(freida, pepillo) -> Nosedive(freida, edie)\nAutotomize(edie, pepillo) -> Maniacal(pepillo)\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Nosedive(x, freida))\nAutotomize(pepillo, freida) -> not Handless(freida)\nforall x (Nosedive(x, freida) -> Carbonyl(x))\nforall x (Control(x, edie) -> Overgreedy(edie))\nforall x (Control(x, pepillo) -> not Overgreedy(x))\nNosedive(pepillo, edie) -> Nosedive(pepillo, freida)\n\nNosedive(freida, freida)\n\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Nosedive(x, freida)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The robinett network the lenore. The robinett is shuha. The robinett is not mistreated. The robinett piddle the quincy. The robinett piddle the lenore. The robinett identify the quincy. The robinett identify the lenore. The quincy network the robinett. The quincy network the lenore. The quincy is neglected. The lenore network the quincy. The lenore is neglected. The lenore is not debonair. The lenore piddle the robinett. The lenore does not like the quincy. The lenore does not see the robinett. If the lenore network the robinett then the lenore identify the quincy. If the quincy network the robinett then the robinett is shuha. If something is mistreated then it identify the lenore. If the robinett network the lenore then the lenore is not debonair. If something identify the lenore then it is apnoeic. If something piddle the quincy then the quincy is mistreated. If something piddle the robinett then it is not mistreated. If the robinett identify the quincy then the robinett identify the lenore. The lenore does not see the quincy.", "logic": "\nNetwork(robinett, lenore)\nShuha(robinett)\nnot Mistreated(robinett)\nPiddle(robinett, quincy)\nPiddle(robinett, lenore)\nIdentify(robinett, quincy)\nIdentify(robinett, lenore)\nNetwork(quincy, robinett)\nNetwork(quincy, lenore)\nNeglected(quincy)\nNetwork(lenore, quincy)\nNeglected(lenore)\nnot Debonair(lenore)\nPiddle(lenore, robinett)\nnot Piddle(lenore, quincy)\nnot Identify(lenore, robinett)\nNetwork(lenore, robinett) -> Identify(lenore, quincy)\nNetwork(quincy, robinett) -> Shuha(robinett)\nforall x (Mistreated(x) -> Identify(x, lenore))\nNetwork(robinett, lenore) -> not Debonair(lenore)\nforall x (Identify(x, lenore) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Piddle(x, quincy) -> Mistreated(quincy))\nforall x (Piddle(x, robinett) -> not Mistreated(x))\nIdentify(robinett, quincy) -> Identify(robinett, lenore)\n\nnot Identify(lenore, quincy)\n\nNetwork(lenore, robinett) -> Identify(lenore, quincy) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The benedicta plain the vinita. The benedicta is styptic. The benedicta is not crashing. The benedicta flaw the diandra. The benedicta flaw the vinita. The benedicta chaffer the diandra. The benedicta chaffer the vinita. The diandra plain the benedicta. The diandra plain the vinita. The diandra is sneaking. The vinita plain the diandra. The vinita is sneaking. The vinita is not stupid. The vinita flaw the benedicta. The vinita does not like the diandra. The vinita does not see the benedicta. If the vinita plain the benedicta then the vinita chaffer the diandra. If the diandra plain the benedicta then the benedicta is styptic. If something is crashing then it chaffer the vinita. If the benedicta plain the vinita then the vinita is not stupid. If something chaffer the vinita then it is unlawful. If something flaw the diandra then the diandra is crashing. If something flaw the benedicta then it is not crashing. If the benedicta chaffer the diandra then the benedicta chaffer the vinita. The benedicta plain the benedicta.", "logic": "\nPlain(benedicta, vinita)\nStyptic(benedicta)\nnot Crashing(benedicta)\nFlaw(benedicta, diandra)\nFlaw(benedicta, vinita)\nChaffer(benedicta, diandra)\nChaffer(benedicta, vinita)\nPlain(diandra, benedicta)\nPlain(diandra, vinita)\nSneaking(diandra)\nPlain(vinita, diandra)\nSneaking(vinita)\nnot Stupid(vinita)\nFlaw(vinita, benedicta)\nnot Flaw(vinita, diandra)\nnot Chaffer(vinita, benedicta)\nPlain(vinita, benedicta) -> Chaffer(vinita, diandra)\nPlain(diandra, benedicta) -> Styptic(benedicta)\nforall x (Crashing(x) -> Chaffer(x, vinita))\nPlain(benedicta, vinita) -> not Stupid(vinita)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, vinita) -> Unlawful(x))\nforall x (Flaw(x, diandra) -> Crashing(diandra))\nforall x (Flaw(x, benedicta) -> not Crashing(x))\nChaffer(benedicta, diandra) -> Chaffer(benedicta, vinita)\n\nPlain(benedicta, benedicta)\n\nPlain(benedicta, benedicta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The pincas recuse the jakob. The pincas is ictal. The pincas is not umbellate. The pincas brattice the ange. The pincas brattice the jakob. The pincas interest the ange. The pincas interest the jakob. The ange recuse the pincas. The ange recuse the jakob. The ange is deskbound. The jakob recuse the ange. The jakob is deskbound. The jakob is not rewarding. The jakob brattice the pincas. The jakob does not like the ange. The jakob does not see the pincas. If the jakob recuse the pincas then the jakob interest the ange. If the ange recuse the pincas then the pincas is ictal. If something is umbellate then it interest the jakob. If the pincas recuse the jakob then the jakob is not rewarding. If something interest the jakob then it is motorial. If something brattice the ange then the ange is umbellate. If something brattice the pincas then it is not umbellate. If the pincas interest the ange then the pincas interest the jakob. The ange does not see the ange.", "logic": "\nRecuse(pincas, jakob)\nIctal(pincas)\nnot Umbellate(pincas)\nBrattice(pincas, ange)\nBrattice(pincas, jakob)\nInterest(pincas, ange)\nInterest(pincas, jakob)\nRecuse(ange, pincas)\nRecuse(ange, jakob)\nDeskbound(ange)\nRecuse(jakob, ange)\nDeskbound(jakob)\nnot Rewarding(jakob)\nBrattice(jakob, pincas)\nnot Brattice(jakob, ange)\nnot Interest(jakob, pincas)\nRecuse(jakob, pincas) -> Interest(jakob, ange)\nRecuse(ange, pincas) -> Ictal(pincas)\nforall x (Umbellate(x) -> Interest(x, jakob))\nRecuse(pincas, jakob) -> not Rewarding(jakob)\nforall x (Interest(x, jakob) -> Motorial(x))\nforall x (Brattice(x, ange) -> Umbellate(ange))\nforall x (Brattice(x, pincas) -> not Umbellate(x))\nInterest(pincas, ange) -> Interest(pincas, jakob)\n\nnot Interest(ange, ange)\n\nnot Interest(ange, ange) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The cybel lexicalize the rem. The cybel is tsarist. The cybel is not satiable. The cybel tenderise the floria. The cybel tenderise the rem. The cybel agitate the floria. The cybel agitate the rem. The floria lexicalize the cybel. The floria lexicalize the rem. The floria is maxillary. The rem lexicalize the floria. The rem is maxillary. The rem is not malayan. The rem tenderise the cybel. The rem does not like the floria. The rem does not see the cybel. If the rem lexicalize the cybel then the rem agitate the floria. If the floria lexicalize the cybel then the cybel is tsarist. If something is satiable then it agitate the rem. If the cybel lexicalize the rem then the rem is not malayan. If something agitate the rem then it is doglike. If something tenderise the floria then the floria is satiable. If something tenderise the cybel then it is not satiable. If the cybel agitate the floria then the cybel agitate the rem. The floria tenderise the rem.", "logic": "\nLexicalize(cybel, rem)\nTsarist(cybel)\nnot Satiable(cybel)\nTenderise(cybel, floria)\nTenderise(cybel, rem)\nAgitate(cybel, floria)\nAgitate(cybel, rem)\nLexicalize(floria, cybel)\nLexicalize(floria, rem)\nMaxillary(floria)\nLexicalize(rem, floria)\nMaxillary(rem)\nnot Malayan(rem)\nTenderise(rem, cybel)\nnot Tenderise(rem, floria)\nnot Agitate(rem, cybel)\nLexicalize(rem, cybel) -> Agitate(rem, floria)\nLexicalize(floria, cybel) -> Tsarist(cybel)\nforall x (Satiable(x) -> Agitate(x, rem))\nLexicalize(cybel, rem) -> not Malayan(rem)\nforall x (Agitate(x, rem) -> Doglike(x))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, floria) -> Satiable(floria))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, cybel) -> not Satiable(x))\nAgitate(cybel, floria) -> Agitate(cybel, rem)\n\nTenderise(floria, rem)\n\nTenderise(floria, rem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The natala unbalance the tull. The natala is wooly. The natala is not ungrudging. The natala allot the cherilyn. The natala allot the tull. The natala hill the cherilyn. The natala hill the tull. The cherilyn unbalance the natala. The cherilyn unbalance the tull. The cherilyn is jovial. The tull unbalance the cherilyn. The tull is jovial. The tull is not paired. The tull allot the natala. The tull does not like the cherilyn. The tull does not see the natala. If the tull unbalance the natala then the tull hill the cherilyn. If the cherilyn unbalance the natala then the natala is wooly. If something is ungrudging then it hill the tull. If the natala unbalance the tull then the tull is not paired. If something hill the tull then it is encysted. If something allot the cherilyn then the cherilyn is ungrudging. If something allot the natala then it is not ungrudging. If the natala hill the cherilyn then the natala hill the tull. The cherilyn does not eat the cherilyn.", "logic": "\nUnbalance(natala, tull)\nWooly(natala)\nnot Ungrudging(natala)\nAllot(natala, cherilyn)\nAllot(natala, tull)\nHill(natala, cherilyn)\nHill(natala, tull)\nUnbalance(cherilyn, natala)\nUnbalance(cherilyn, tull)\nJovial(cherilyn)\nUnbalance(tull, cherilyn)\nJovial(tull)\nnot Paired(tull)\nAllot(tull, natala)\nnot Allot(tull, cherilyn)\nnot Hill(tull, natala)\nUnbalance(tull, natala) -> Hill(tull, cherilyn)\nUnbalance(cherilyn, natala) -> Wooly(natala)\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) -> Hill(x, tull))\nUnbalance(natala, tull) -> not Paired(tull)\nforall x (Hill(x, tull) -> Encysted(x))\nforall x (Allot(x, cherilyn) -> Ungrudging(cherilyn))\nforall x (Allot(x, natala) -> not Ungrudging(x))\nHill(natala, cherilyn) -> Hill(natala, tull)\n\nnot Unbalance(cherilyn, cherilyn)\n\nnot Unbalance(cherilyn, cherilyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "The tedie serenade the hiralal. The tedie is safe. The tedie is not laxative. The tedie revile the goldi. The tedie revile the hiralal. The tedie notify the goldi. The tedie notify the hiralal. The goldi serenade the tedie. The goldi serenade the hiralal. The goldi is stainless. The hiralal serenade the goldi. The hiralal is stainless. The hiralal is not hydraulic. The hiralal revile the tedie. The hiralal does not like the goldi. The hiralal does not see the tedie. If the hiralal serenade the tedie then the hiralal notify the goldi. If the goldi serenade the tedie then the tedie is safe. If something is laxative then it notify the hiralal. If the tedie serenade the hiralal then the hiralal is not hydraulic. If something notify the hiralal then it is irish. If something revile the goldi then the goldi is laxative. If something revile the tedie then it is not laxative. If the tedie notify the goldi then the tedie notify the hiralal. The tedie notify the tedie.", "logic": "\nSerenade(tedie, hiralal)\nSafe(tedie)\nnot Laxative(tedie)\nRevile(tedie, goldi)\nRevile(tedie, hiralal)\nNotify(tedie, goldi)\nNotify(tedie, hiralal)\nSerenade(goldi, tedie)\nSerenade(goldi, hiralal)\nStainless(goldi)\nSerenade(hiralal, goldi)\nStainless(hiralal)\nnot Hydraulic(hiralal)\nRevile(hiralal, tedie)\nnot Revile(hiralal, goldi)\nnot Notify(hiralal, tedie)\nSerenade(hiralal, tedie) -> Notify(hiralal, goldi)\nSerenade(goldi, tedie) -> Safe(tedie)\nforall x (Laxative(x) -> Notify(x, hiralal))\nSerenade(tedie, hiralal) -> not Hydraulic(hiralal)\nforall x (Notify(x, hiralal) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Revile(x, goldi) -> Laxative(goldi))\nforall x (Revile(x, tedie) -> not Laxative(x))\nNotify(tedie, goldi) -> Notify(tedie, hiralal)\n\nNotify(tedie, tedie)\n\nNotify(tedie, tedie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1062"} {"premises": "Roy is wifelike. Roy is percussive. Roy is nameless. Roy is cherubic. Roy is consequent. Roy is dumfounded. Dorelle is wifelike. Dorelle is nameless. Dorelle is consequent. Dorelle is dumfounded. All percussive people are wifelike. If someone is lithesome and consequent then they are dumfounded. All wifelike, cherubic people are percussive. Young people are cherubic. Nice people are lithesome. If someone is percussive and lithesome then they are nameless. Dorelle is wifelike.", "logic": "\nWifelike(roy)\nPercussive(roy)\nNameless(roy)\nCherubic(roy)\nConsequent(roy)\nDumfounded(roy)\nWifelike(dorelle)\nNameless(dorelle)\nConsequent(dorelle)\nDumfounded(dorelle)\nforall x (Percussive(x) -> Wifelike(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) and Consequent(x) -> Dumfounded(x))\nforall x (Wifelike(x) and Cherubic(x) -> Percussive(x))\nforall x (Dumfounded(x) -> Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Percussive(x) -> Lithesome(x))\nforall x (Percussive(x) and Lithesome(x) -> Nameless(x))\n\nWifelike(dorelle)\n\ntherefore Wifelike(dorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Fedora is manual. Fedora is apposite. Fedora is gibelike. Fedora is xiii. Fedora is miraculous. Fedora is nonspatial. Garcon is manual. Garcon is gibelike. Garcon is miraculous. Garcon is nonspatial. All apposite people are manual. If someone is proscribed and miraculous then they are nonspatial. All manual, xiii people are apposite. Young people are xiii. Nice people are proscribed. If someone is apposite and proscribed then they are gibelike. Garcon is not gibelike.", "logic": "\nManual(fedora)\nApposite(fedora)\nGibelike(fedora)\nXiii(fedora)\nMiraculous(fedora)\nNonspatial(fedora)\nManual(garcon)\nGibelike(garcon)\nMiraculous(garcon)\nNonspatial(garcon)\nforall x (Apposite(x) -> Manual(x))\nforall x (Proscribed(x) and Miraculous(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) and Xiii(x) -> Apposite(x))\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Xiii(x))\nforall x (Apposite(x) -> Proscribed(x))\nforall x (Apposite(x) and Proscribed(x) -> Gibelike(x))\n\nnot Gibelike(garcon)\n\ntherefore Gibelike(garcon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Floyd is headlong. Floyd is emboldened. Floyd is endogenic. Floyd is powerless. Floyd is agrestic. Floyd is adolescent. Ebba is headlong. Ebba is endogenic. Ebba is agrestic. Ebba is adolescent. All emboldened people are headlong. If someone is oddish and agrestic then they are adolescent. All headlong, powerless people are emboldened. Young people are powerless. Nice people are oddish. If someone is emboldened and oddish then they are endogenic. Ebba is powerless.", "logic": "\nHeadlong(floyd)\nEmboldened(floyd)\nEndogenic(floyd)\nPowerless(floyd)\nAgrestic(floyd)\nAdolescent(floyd)\nHeadlong(ebba)\nEndogenic(ebba)\nAgrestic(ebba)\nAdolescent(ebba)\nforall x (Emboldened(x) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Headlong(x) and Powerless(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) -> Powerless(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and Oddish(x) -> Endogenic(x))\n\nPowerless(ebba)\n\nAdolescent(ebba) and forall x (Adolescent(x) -> Powerless(x)) -> therefore Powerless(ebba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Love is untangled. Love is burlesque. Love is unheeded. Love is suntanned. Love is preferent. Love is anagogical. Felicdad is untangled. Felicdad is unheeded. Felicdad is preferent. Felicdad is anagogical. All burlesque people are untangled. If someone is quelled and preferent then they are anagogical. All untangled, suntanned people are burlesque. Young people are suntanned. Nice people are quelled. If someone is burlesque and quelled then they are unheeded. Love is not quelled.", "logic": "\nUntangled(love)\nBurlesque(love)\nUnheeded(love)\nSuntanned(love)\nPreferent(love)\nAnagogical(love)\nUntangled(felicdad)\nUnheeded(felicdad)\nPreferent(felicdad)\nAnagogical(felicdad)\nforall x (Burlesque(x) -> Untangled(x))\nforall x (Quelled(x) and Preferent(x) -> Anagogical(x))\nforall x (Untangled(x) and Suntanned(x) -> Burlesque(x))\nforall x (Anagogical(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Burlesque(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Burlesque(x) and Quelled(x) -> Unheeded(x))\n\nnot Quelled(love)\n\nBurlesque(love) and forall x (Burlesque(x) -> Quelled(x)) -> therefore Quelled(love)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Sherilyn is downbound. Sherilyn is rotund. Sherilyn is dignified. Sherilyn is tractable. Sherilyn is organismal. Sherilyn is coaxal. Casey is downbound. Casey is dignified. Casey is organismal. Casey is coaxal. All rotund people are downbound. If someone is lebanese and organismal then they are coaxal. All downbound, tractable people are rotund. Young people are tractable. Nice people are lebanese. If someone is rotund and lebanese then they are dignified. Casey is rotund.", "logic": "\nDownbound(sherilyn)\nRotund(sherilyn)\nDignified(sherilyn)\nTractable(sherilyn)\nOrganismal(sherilyn)\nCoaxal(sherilyn)\nDownbound(casey)\nDignified(casey)\nOrganismal(casey)\nCoaxal(casey)\nforall x (Rotund(x) -> Downbound(x))\nforall x (Lebanese(x) and Organismal(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Downbound(x) and Tractable(x) -> Rotund(x))\nforall x (Coaxal(x) -> Tractable(x))\nforall x (Rotund(x) -> Lebanese(x))\nforall x (Rotund(x) and Lebanese(x) -> Dignified(x))\n\nRotund(casey)\n\nCoaxal(casey) and forall x (Coaxal(x) -> Tractable(x)) -> therefore Tractable(casey) Downbound(casey) and Tractable(casey) and forall x (Downbound(x) and Tractable(x) -> Rotund(x)) -> therefore Rotund(casey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Elliott is processed. Elliott is accoutered. Elliott is flamboyant. Elliott is tigerish. Elliott is prevenient. Elliott is stocky. Maure is processed. Maure is flamboyant. Maure is prevenient. Maure is stocky. All accoutered people are processed. If someone is cased and prevenient then they are stocky. All processed, tigerish people are accoutered. Young people are tigerish. Nice people are cased. If someone is accoutered and cased then they are flamboyant. Maure is not accoutered.", "logic": "\nProcessed(elliott)\nAccoutered(elliott)\nFlamboyant(elliott)\nTigerish(elliott)\nPrevenient(elliott)\nStocky(elliott)\nProcessed(maure)\nFlamboyant(maure)\nPrevenient(maure)\nStocky(maure)\nforall x (Accoutered(x) -> Processed(x))\nforall x (Cased(x) and Prevenient(x) -> Stocky(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) and Tigerish(x) -> Accoutered(x))\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Accoutered(x) -> Cased(x))\nforall x (Accoutered(x) and Cased(x) -> Flamboyant(x))\n\nnot Accoutered(maure)\n\nStocky(maure) and forall x (Stocky(x) -> Tigerish(x)) -> therefore Tigerish(maure) Processed(maure) and Tigerish(maure) and forall x (Processed(x) and Tigerish(x) -> Accoutered(x)) -> therefore Accoutered(maure)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Stevy is liberal. Stevy is tautologic. Stevy is easy. Stevy is unapparent. Stevy is brutal. Stevy is afoot. Odilia is liberal. Odilia is easy. Odilia is brutal. Odilia is afoot. All tautologic people are liberal. If someone is unfeeling and brutal then they are afoot. All liberal, unapparent people are tautologic. Young people are unapparent. Nice people are unfeeling. If someone is tautologic and unfeeling then they are easy. Odilia is unfeeling.", "logic": "\nLiberal(stevy)\nTautologic(stevy)\nEasy(stevy)\nUnapparent(stevy)\nBrutal(stevy)\nAfoot(stevy)\nLiberal(odilia)\nEasy(odilia)\nBrutal(odilia)\nAfoot(odilia)\nforall x (Tautologic(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) and Brutal(x) -> Afoot(x))\nforall x (Liberal(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nforall x (Afoot(x) -> Unapparent(x))\nforall x (Tautologic(x) -> Unfeeling(x))\nforall x (Tautologic(x) and Unfeeling(x) -> Easy(x))\n\nUnfeeling(odilia)\n\nAfoot(odilia) and forall x (Afoot(x) -> Unapparent(x)) -> therefore Unapparent(odilia) Liberal(odilia) and Unapparent(odilia) and forall x (Liberal(x) and Unapparent(x) -> Tautologic(x)) -> therefore Tautologic(odilia) Tautologic(odilia) and forall x (Tautologic(x) -> Unfeeling(x)) -> therefore Unfeeling(odilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "Jaquelyn is skeletal. Jaquelyn is palmate. Jaquelyn is martial. Jaquelyn is untellable. Jaquelyn is recurved. Jaquelyn is indurate. Fox is skeletal. Fox is martial. Fox is recurved. Fox is indurate. All palmate people are skeletal. If someone is oaten and recurved then they are indurate. All skeletal, untellable people are palmate. Young people are untellable. Nice people are oaten. If someone is palmate and oaten then they are martial. Fox is not oaten.", "logic": "\nSkeletal(jaquelyn)\nPalmate(jaquelyn)\nMartial(jaquelyn)\nUntellable(jaquelyn)\nRecurved(jaquelyn)\nIndurate(jaquelyn)\nSkeletal(fox)\nMartial(fox)\nRecurved(fox)\nIndurate(fox)\nforall x (Palmate(x) -> Skeletal(x))\nforall x (Oaten(x) and Recurved(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Skeletal(x) and Untellable(x) -> Palmate(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) -> Oaten(x))\nforall x (Palmate(x) and Oaten(x) -> Martial(x))\n\nnot Oaten(fox)\n\nIndurate(fox) and forall x (Indurate(x) -> Untellable(x)) -> therefore Untellable(fox) Skeletal(fox) and Untellable(fox) and forall x (Skeletal(x) and Untellable(x) -> Palmate(x)) -> therefore Palmate(fox) Palmate(fox) and forall x (Palmate(x) -> Oaten(x)) -> therefore Oaten(fox)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1383"} {"premises": "The genvieve is dense. Round things are not incoming. If something is incoming and not statewide then it is perinatal. The genvieve is dense.", "logic": "\nDense(genvieve)\nforall x (Dense(x) -> not Incoming(x))\nforall x (Incoming(x) and not Statewide(x) -> Perinatal(x))\n\nDense(genvieve)\n\ntherefore Dense(genvieve)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The andres is self. Round things are not uncrowded. If something is uncrowded and not tramontane then it is daily. The andres is not self.", "logic": "\nSelf(andres)\nforall x (Self(x) -> not Uncrowded(x))\nforall x (Uncrowded(x) and not Tramontane(x) -> Daily(x))\n\nnot Self(andres)\n\ntherefore Self(andres)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The julie is unfretted. Round things are not biaural. If something is biaural and not subaltern then it is kosher. The julie is not biaural.", "logic": "\nUnfretted(julie)\nforall x (Unfretted(x) -> not Biaural(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) and not Subaltern(x) -> Kosher(x))\n\nnot Biaural(julie)\n\nUnfretted(julie) and forall x (Unfretted(x) -> not Biaural(x)) -> therefore not Biaural(julie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The klaus is squealing. Round things are not regulation. If something is regulation and not beta then it is tempting. The klaus is regulation.", "logic": "\nSquealing(klaus)\nforall x (Squealing(x) -> not Regulation(x))\nforall x (Regulation(x) and not Beta(x) -> Tempting(x))\n\nRegulation(klaus)\n\nSquealing(klaus) and forall x (Squealing(x) -> not Regulation(x)) -> therefore not Regulation(klaus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The quigman is bookish. Round things are not qabalistic. If something is qabalistic and not carbonous then it is spousal. The quigman is not spousal.", "logic": "\nBookish(quigman)\nforall x (Bookish(x) -> not Qabalistic(x))\nforall x (Qabalistic(x) and not Carbonous(x) -> Spousal(x))\n\nnot Spousal(quigman)\n\nforall x (Qabalistic(x) and not Carbonous(x) -> Spousal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The ruperta is foliose. Round things are not smothered. If something is smothered and not sigmoidal then it is mulish. The ruperta sees the ruperta.", "logic": "\nFoliose(ruperta)\nforall x (Foliose(x) -> not Smothered(x))\nforall x (Smothered(x) and not Sigmoidal(x) -> Mulish(x))\n\nSees(ruperta, ruperta)\n\nSees(ruperta, ruperta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The lauree is bivalent. Round things are not besprent. If something is besprent and not adsorptive then it is loved. The lauree is not green.", "logic": "\nBivalent(lauree)\nforall x (Bivalent(x) -> not Besprent(x))\nforall x (Besprent(x) and not Adsorptive(x) -> Loved(x))\n\nnot Green(lauree)\n\nnot Green(lauree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The shalom is frozen. Round things are not macro. If something is macro and not unsolvable then it is peptic. The shalom needs the shalom.", "logic": "\nFrozen(shalom)\nforall x (Frozen(x) -> not Macro(x))\nforall x (Macro(x) and not Unsolvable(x) -> Peptic(x))\n\nNeeds(shalom, shalom)\n\nNeeds(shalom, shalom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-888"} {"premises": "The andros replant the winnifred. The winnifred is grumose. The mathilda does not like the winnifred. The devonna is not grumose. If someone overhear the mathilda then the mathilda does not like the winnifred. If someone overhear the andros and they need the winnifred then they are not folding. The devonna is not grumose.", "logic": "\nReplant(andros, winnifred)\nGrumose(winnifred)\nnot Replant(mathilda, winnifred)\nnot Grumose(devonna)\nforall x (Overhear(x, mathilda) -> not Replant(mathilda, winnifred))\nforall x (Overhear(x, andros) and Overhear(x, winnifred) -> not Folding(x))\n\nnot Grumose(devonna)\n\ntherefore not Grumose(devonna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5557"} {"premises": "The wallache piss the stafani. The stafani is locomotor. The garwood does not like the stafani. The devonna is not locomotor. If someone junket the garwood then the garwood does not like the stafani. If someone junket the wallache and they need the stafani then they are not drudging. The devonna is locomotor.", "logic": "\nPiss(wallache, stafani)\nLocomotor(stafani)\nnot Piss(garwood, stafani)\nnot Locomotor(devonna)\nforall x (Junket(x, garwood) -> not Piss(garwood, stafani))\nforall x (Junket(x, wallache) and Junket(x, stafani) -> not Drudging(x))\n\nLocomotor(devonna)\n\ntherefore not Locomotor(devonna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5557"} {"premises": "The crissy program the christos. The christos is indusial. The charlean does not like the christos. The barbette is not indusial. If someone abduct the charlean then the charlean does not like the christos. If someone abduct the crissy and they need the christos then they are not volunteer. The crissy is not indusial.", "logic": "\nProgram(crissy, christos)\nIndusial(christos)\nnot Program(charlean, christos)\nnot Indusial(barbette)\nforall x (Abduct(x, charlean) -> not Program(charlean, christos))\nforall x (Abduct(x, crissy) and Abduct(x, christos) -> not Volunteer(x))\n\nnot Indusial(crissy)\n\nnot Indusial(crissy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5557"} {"premises": "The englebart doctor the gerti. The gerti is bromic. The flem does not like the gerti. The marjie is not bromic. If someone trouble the flem then the flem does not like the gerti. If someone trouble the englebart and they need the gerti then they are not profligate. The englebart doctor the flem.", "logic": "\nDoctor(englebart, gerti)\nBromic(gerti)\nnot Doctor(flem, gerti)\nnot Bromic(marjie)\nforall x (Trouble(x, flem) -> not Doctor(flem, gerti))\nforall x (Trouble(x, englebart) and Trouble(x, gerti) -> not Profligate(x))\n\nDoctor(englebart, flem)\n\nDoctor(englebart, flem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5557"} {"premises": "Harmonia is serologic. Harmonia is heartsick. Desmund is serologic. Desmund is stringent. Desmund is pervasive. Desmund is paranasal. Desmund is chitinous. Wake is serologic. Wake is balanced. Wake is pervasive. Wake is paranasal. Wake is heartsick. If something is stringent and pervasive then it is heartsick. If something is chitinous and balanced then it is paranasal. Desmund is chitinous.", "logic": "\nSerologic(harmonia)\nHeartsick(harmonia)\nSerologic(desmund)\nStringent(desmund)\nPervasive(desmund)\nParanasal(desmund)\nChitinous(desmund)\nSerologic(wake)\nBalanced(wake)\nPervasive(wake)\nParanasal(wake)\nHeartsick(wake)\nforall x (Stringent(x) and Pervasive(x) -> Heartsick(x))\nforall x (Chitinous(x) and Balanced(x) -> Paranasal(x))\n\nChitinous(desmund)\n\ntherefore Chitinous(desmund)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "Valli is repeated. Valli is hortative. Isabelle is repeated. Isabelle is alchemical. Isabelle is unclipped. Isabelle is antiphonal. Isabelle is anisogamic. Leticia is repeated. Leticia is forfeit. Leticia is unclipped. Leticia is antiphonal. Leticia is hortative. If something is alchemical and unclipped then it is hortative. If something is anisogamic and forfeit then it is antiphonal. Leticia is not hortative.", "logic": "\nRepeated(valli)\nHortative(valli)\nRepeated(isabelle)\nAlchemical(isabelle)\nUnclipped(isabelle)\nAntiphonal(isabelle)\nAnisogamic(isabelle)\nRepeated(leticia)\nForfeit(leticia)\nUnclipped(leticia)\nAntiphonal(leticia)\nHortative(leticia)\nforall x (Alchemical(x) and Unclipped(x) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Forfeit(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\n\nnot Hortative(leticia)\n\ntherefore Hortative(leticia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "Gunilla is soured. Gunilla is jain. Romona is soured. Romona is feckless. Romona is catabolic. Romona is endearing. Romona is ugandan. Tarah is soured. Tarah is unoriginal. Tarah is catabolic. Tarah is endearing. Tarah is jain. If something is feckless and catabolic then it is jain. If something is ugandan and unoriginal then it is endearing. Romona is jain.", "logic": "\nSoured(gunilla)\nJain(gunilla)\nSoured(romona)\nFeckless(romona)\nCatabolic(romona)\nEndearing(romona)\nUgandan(romona)\nSoured(tarah)\nUnoriginal(tarah)\nCatabolic(tarah)\nEndearing(tarah)\nJain(tarah)\nforall x (Feckless(x) and Catabolic(x) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) and Unoriginal(x) -> Endearing(x))\n\nJain(romona)\n\nFeckless(romona) and Catabolic(romona) and forall x (Feckless(x) and Catabolic(x) -> Jain(x)) -> therefore Jain(romona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "Nathanil is covert. Nathanil is carotid. Pierette is covert. Pierette is delphian. Pierette is sharing. Pierette is dominical. Pierette is mannerly. Silvan is covert. Silvan is vulcanized. Silvan is sharing. Silvan is dominical. Silvan is carotid. If something is delphian and sharing then it is carotid. If something is mannerly and vulcanized then it is dominical. Pierette is not carotid.", "logic": "\nCovert(nathanil)\nCarotid(nathanil)\nCovert(pierette)\nDelphian(pierette)\nSharing(pierette)\nDominical(pierette)\nMannerly(pierette)\nCovert(silvan)\nVulcanized(silvan)\nSharing(silvan)\nDominical(silvan)\nCarotid(silvan)\nforall x (Delphian(x) and Sharing(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Mannerly(x) and Vulcanized(x) -> Dominical(x))\n\nnot Carotid(pierette)\n\nDelphian(pierette) and Sharing(pierette) and forall x (Delphian(x) and Sharing(x) -> Carotid(x)) -> therefore Carotid(pierette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "Emile is redundant. Emile is naif. Kostas is redundant. Kostas is diverse. Kostas is unmedical. Kostas is ceremonial. Kostas is adnexal. Chan is redundant. Chan is dandy. Chan is unmedical. Chan is ceremonial. Chan is naif. If something is diverse and unmedical then it is naif. If something is adnexal and dandy then it is ceremonial. Emile is not ceremonial.", "logic": "\nRedundant(emile)\nNaif(emile)\nRedundant(kostas)\nDiverse(kostas)\nUnmedical(kostas)\nCeremonial(kostas)\nAdnexal(kostas)\nRedundant(chan)\nDandy(chan)\nUnmedical(chan)\nCeremonial(chan)\nNaif(chan)\nforall x (Diverse(x) and Unmedical(x) -> Naif(x))\nforall x (Adnexal(x) and Dandy(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\n\nnot Ceremonial(emile)\n\nforall x (Adnexal(x) and Dandy(x) -> Ceremonial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "Willy is inverted. Willy is gleeful. Hannie is inverted. Hannie is despoiled. Hannie is oblong. Hannie is awestruck. Hannie is contrabass. Bryce is inverted. Bryce is ceremonial. Bryce is oblong. Bryce is awestruck. Bryce is gleeful. If something is despoiled and oblong then it is gleeful. If something is contrabass and ceremonial then it is awestruck. Hannie is ceremonial.", "logic": "\nInverted(willy)\nGleeful(willy)\nInverted(hannie)\nDespoiled(hannie)\nOblong(hannie)\nAwestruck(hannie)\nContrabass(hannie)\nInverted(bryce)\nCeremonial(bryce)\nOblong(bryce)\nAwestruck(bryce)\nGleeful(bryce)\nforall x (Despoiled(x) and Oblong(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Contrabass(x) and Ceremonial(x) -> Awestruck(x))\n\nCeremonial(hannie)\n\nCeremonial(hannie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "Elonore is ebullient. Elonore is roughened. Kiah is ebullient. Kiah is eighth. Kiah is provable. Kiah is stomachic. Kiah is mousy. Kylie is ebullient. Kylie is cognitive. Kylie is provable. Kylie is stomachic. Kylie is roughened. If something is eighth and provable then it is roughened. If something is mousy and cognitive then it is stomachic. Kylie is not eighth.", "logic": "\nEbullient(elonore)\nRoughened(elonore)\nEbullient(kiah)\nEighth(kiah)\nProvable(kiah)\nStomachic(kiah)\nMousy(kiah)\nEbullient(kylie)\nCognitive(kylie)\nProvable(kylie)\nStomachic(kylie)\nRoughened(kylie)\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Provable(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Mousy(x) and Cognitive(x) -> Stomachic(x))\n\nnot Eighth(kylie)\n\nnot Eighth(kylie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "Sharon is bimetal. Sharon is iraqi. Corella is bimetal. Corella is antiknock. Corella is overbusy. Corella is traceable. Corella is morganatic. Dotty is bimetal. Dotty is ramate. Dotty is overbusy. Dotty is traceable. Dotty is iraqi. If something is antiknock and overbusy then it is iraqi. If something is morganatic and ramate then it is traceable. Sharon is antiknock.", "logic": "\nBimetal(sharon)\nIraqi(sharon)\nBimetal(corella)\nAntiknock(corella)\nOverbusy(corella)\nTraceable(corella)\nMorganatic(corella)\nBimetal(dotty)\nRamate(dotty)\nOverbusy(dotty)\nTraceable(dotty)\nIraqi(dotty)\nforall x (Antiknock(x) and Overbusy(x) -> Iraqi(x))\nforall x (Morganatic(x) and Ramate(x) -> Traceable(x))\n\nAntiknock(sharon)\n\nAntiknock(sharon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2475"} {"premises": "The merrili harp the gretta. The merrili harp the pearl. The anica prise the merrili. The anica is detached. The anica is enough. The anica harp the pearl. The anica recidivate the merrili. The anica recidivate the gretta. The gretta prise the anica. The gretta recidivate the anica. The gretta recidivate the pearl. The pearl prise the anica. The pearl is baculiform. The pearl is domestic. The pearl recidivate the merrili. If something recidivate the gretta then the gretta harp the merrili. If something is detached then it is domestic. If something recidivate the merrili and it is enough then the merrili is statute. If something prise the pearl and it harp the anica then it recidivate the anica. If something harp the merrili then the merrili is detached. If the pearl harp the anica and the anica is detached then the pearl is domestic. The pearl recidivate the merrili.", "logic": "\nHarp(merrili, gretta)\nHarp(merrili, pearl)\nPrise(anica, merrili)\nDetached(anica)\nEnough(anica)\nHarp(anica, pearl)\nRecidivate(anica, merrili)\nRecidivate(anica, gretta)\nPrise(gretta, anica)\nRecidivate(gretta, anica)\nRecidivate(gretta, pearl)\nPrise(pearl, anica)\nBaculiform(pearl)\nDomestic(pearl)\nRecidivate(pearl, merrili)\nforall x (Recidivate(x, gretta) -> Harp(gretta, merrili))\nforall x (Detached(x) -> Domestic(x))\nforall x (Recidivate(x, merrili) and Enough(x) -> Statute(merrili))\nforall x (Prise(x, pearl) and Harp(x, anica) -> Recidivate(x, anica))\nforall x (Harp(x, merrili) -> Detached(merrili))\nHarp(pearl, anica) and Detached(anica) -> Domestic(pearl)\n\nRecidivate(pearl, merrili)\n\ntherefore Recidivate(pearl, merrili)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The sukey sorb the lenka. The sukey sorb the claudelle. The anetta line the sukey. The anetta is fourteen. The anetta is awkward. The anetta sorb the claudelle. The anetta signalise the sukey. The anetta signalise the lenka. The lenka line the anetta. The lenka signalise the anetta. The lenka signalise the claudelle. The claudelle line the anetta. The claudelle is beastly. The claudelle is gothic. The claudelle signalise the sukey. If something signalise the lenka then the lenka sorb the sukey. If something is fourteen then it is gothic. If something signalise the sukey and it is awkward then the sukey is vaginal. If something line the claudelle and it sorb the anetta then it signalise the anetta. If something sorb the sukey then the sukey is fourteen. If the claudelle sorb the anetta and the anetta is fourteen then the claudelle is gothic. The claudelle does not chase the anetta.", "logic": "\nSorb(sukey, lenka)\nSorb(sukey, claudelle)\nLine(anetta, sukey)\nFourteen(anetta)\nAwkward(anetta)\nSorb(anetta, claudelle)\nSignalise(anetta, sukey)\nSignalise(anetta, lenka)\nLine(lenka, anetta)\nSignalise(lenka, anetta)\nSignalise(lenka, claudelle)\nLine(claudelle, anetta)\nBeastly(claudelle)\nGothic(claudelle)\nSignalise(claudelle, sukey)\nforall x (Signalise(x, lenka) -> Sorb(lenka, sukey))\nforall x (Fourteen(x) -> Gothic(x))\nforall x (Signalise(x, sukey) and Awkward(x) -> Vaginal(sukey))\nforall x (Line(x, claudelle) and Sorb(x, anetta) -> Signalise(x, anetta))\nforall x (Sorb(x, sukey) -> Fourteen(sukey))\nSorb(claudelle, anetta) and Fourteen(anetta) -> Gothic(claudelle)\n\nnot Line(claudelle, anetta)\n\ntherefore Line(claudelle, anetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The hunter colour the page. The hunter colour the stace. The corella wholesale the hunter. The corella is resounding. The corella is unethical. The corella colour the stace. The corella mythicize the hunter. The corella mythicize the page. The page wholesale the corella. The page mythicize the corella. The page mythicize the stace. The stace wholesale the corella. The stace is twelfth. The stace is gooselike. The stace mythicize the hunter. If something mythicize the page then the page colour the hunter. If something is resounding then it is gooselike. If something mythicize the hunter and it is unethical then the hunter is dutch. If something wholesale the stace and it colour the corella then it mythicize the corella. If something colour the hunter then the hunter is resounding. If the stace colour the corella and the corella is resounding then the stace is gooselike. The hunter is dutch.", "logic": "\nColour(hunter, page)\nColour(hunter, stace)\nWholesale(corella, hunter)\nResounding(corella)\nUnethical(corella)\nColour(corella, stace)\nMythicize(corella, hunter)\nMythicize(corella, page)\nWholesale(page, corella)\nMythicize(page, corella)\nMythicize(page, stace)\nWholesale(stace, corella)\nTwelfth(stace)\nGooselike(stace)\nMythicize(stace, hunter)\nforall x (Mythicize(x, page) -> Colour(page, hunter))\nforall x (Resounding(x) -> Gooselike(x))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, hunter) and Unethical(x) -> Dutch(hunter))\nforall x (Wholesale(x, stace) and Colour(x, corella) -> Mythicize(x, corella))\nforall x (Colour(x, hunter) -> Resounding(hunter))\nColour(stace, corella) and Resounding(corella) -> Gooselike(stace)\n\nDutch(hunter)\n\nMythicize(corella, hunter) and Unethical(corella) and forall x (Mythicize(x, hunter) and Unethical(x) -> Dutch(hunter)) -> therefore Dutch(hunter)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The malcah tauten the linus. The malcah tauten the spiros. The phylis outscore the malcah. The phylis is chanted. The phylis is intruding. The phylis tauten the spiros. The phylis rocket the malcah. The phylis rocket the linus. The linus outscore the phylis. The linus rocket the phylis. The linus rocket the spiros. The spiros outscore the phylis. The spiros is myeloid. The spiros is recusant. The spiros rocket the malcah. If something rocket the linus then the linus tauten the malcah. If something is chanted then it is recusant. If something rocket the malcah and it is intruding then the malcah is allegiant. If something outscore the spiros and it tauten the phylis then it rocket the phylis. If something tauten the malcah then the malcah is chanted. If the spiros tauten the phylis and the phylis is chanted then the spiros is recusant. The linus does not need the malcah.", "logic": "\nTauten(malcah, linus)\nTauten(malcah, spiros)\nOutscore(phylis, malcah)\nChanted(phylis)\nIntruding(phylis)\nTauten(phylis, spiros)\nRocket(phylis, malcah)\nRocket(phylis, linus)\nOutscore(linus, phylis)\nRocket(linus, phylis)\nRocket(linus, spiros)\nOutscore(spiros, phylis)\nMyeloid(spiros)\nRecusant(spiros)\nRocket(spiros, malcah)\nforall x (Rocket(x, linus) -> Tauten(linus, malcah))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Recusant(x))\nforall x (Rocket(x, malcah) and Intruding(x) -> Allegiant(malcah))\nforall x (Outscore(x, spiros) and Tauten(x, phylis) -> Rocket(x, phylis))\nforall x (Tauten(x, malcah) -> Chanted(malcah))\nTauten(spiros, phylis) and Chanted(phylis) -> Recusant(spiros)\n\nnot Tauten(linus, malcah)\n\nRocket(phylis, linus) and forall x (Rocket(x, linus) -> Tauten(linus, malcah)) -> therefore Tauten(linus, malcah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The selestina crystalize the doralynn. The selestina crystalize the cyril. The israel bullyrag the selestina. The israel is numidian. The israel is auditive. The israel crystalize the cyril. The israel repose the selestina. The israel repose the doralynn. The doralynn bullyrag the israel. The doralynn repose the israel. The doralynn repose the cyril. The cyril bullyrag the israel. The cyril is chitinous. The cyril is gangling. The cyril repose the selestina. If something repose the doralynn then the doralynn crystalize the selestina. If something is numidian then it is gangling. If something repose the selestina and it is auditive then the selestina is veracious. If something bullyrag the cyril and it crystalize the israel then it repose the israel. If something crystalize the selestina then the selestina is numidian. If the cyril crystalize the israel and the israel is numidian then the cyril is gangling. The selestina is numidian.", "logic": "\nCrystalize(selestina, doralynn)\nCrystalize(selestina, cyril)\nBullyrag(israel, selestina)\nNumidian(israel)\nAuditive(israel)\nCrystalize(israel, cyril)\nRepose(israel, selestina)\nRepose(israel, doralynn)\nBullyrag(doralynn, israel)\nRepose(doralynn, israel)\nRepose(doralynn, cyril)\nBullyrag(cyril, israel)\nChitinous(cyril)\nGangling(cyril)\nRepose(cyril, selestina)\nforall x (Repose(x, doralynn) -> Crystalize(doralynn, selestina))\nforall x (Numidian(x) -> Gangling(x))\nforall x (Repose(x, selestina) and Auditive(x) -> Veracious(selestina))\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, cyril) and Crystalize(x, israel) -> Repose(x, israel))\nforall x (Crystalize(x, selestina) -> Numidian(selestina))\nCrystalize(cyril, israel) and Numidian(israel) -> Gangling(cyril)\n\nNumidian(selestina)\n\nRepose(israel, doralynn) and forall x (Repose(x, doralynn) -> Crystalize(doralynn, selestina)) -> therefore Crystalize(doralynn, selestina) Crystalize(doralynn, selestina) and forall x (Crystalize(x, selestina) -> Numidian(selestina)) -> therefore Numidian(selestina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The jennee tell the pavia. The jennee tell the harris. The meara personate the jennee. The meara is touchable. The meara is crumbly. The meara tell the harris. The meara tattoo the jennee. The meara tattoo the pavia. The pavia personate the meara. The pavia tattoo the meara. The pavia tattoo the harris. The harris personate the meara. The harris is bullocky. The harris is creole. The harris tattoo the jennee. If something tattoo the pavia then the pavia tell the jennee. If something is touchable then it is creole. If something tattoo the jennee and it is crumbly then the jennee is bellied. If something personate the harris and it tell the meara then it tattoo the meara. If something tell the jennee then the jennee is touchable. If the harris tell the meara and the meara is touchable then the harris is creole. The jennee is not touchable.", "logic": "\nTell(jennee, pavia)\nTell(jennee, harris)\nPersonate(meara, jennee)\nTouchable(meara)\nCrumbly(meara)\nTell(meara, harris)\nTattoo(meara, jennee)\nTattoo(meara, pavia)\nPersonate(pavia, meara)\nTattoo(pavia, meara)\nTattoo(pavia, harris)\nPersonate(harris, meara)\nBullocky(harris)\nCreole(harris)\nTattoo(harris, jennee)\nforall x (Tattoo(x, pavia) -> Tell(pavia, jennee))\nforall x (Touchable(x) -> Creole(x))\nforall x (Tattoo(x, jennee) and Crumbly(x) -> Bellied(jennee))\nforall x (Personate(x, harris) and Tell(x, meara) -> Tattoo(x, meara))\nforall x (Tell(x, jennee) -> Touchable(jennee))\nTell(harris, meara) and Touchable(meara) -> Creole(harris)\n\nnot Touchable(jennee)\n\nTattoo(meara, pavia) and forall x (Tattoo(x, pavia) -> Tell(pavia, jennee)) -> therefore Tell(pavia, jennee) Tell(pavia, jennee) and forall x (Tell(x, jennee) -> Touchable(jennee)) -> therefore Touchable(jennee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The glenn post the pip. The glenn post the chet. The tibold damascene the glenn. The tibold is assentient. The tibold is faineant. The tibold post the chet. The tibold uglify the glenn. The tibold uglify the pip. The pip damascene the tibold. The pip uglify the tibold. The pip uglify the chet. The chet damascene the tibold. The chet is eerie. The chet is poorly. The chet uglify the glenn. If something uglify the pip then the pip post the glenn. If something is assentient then it is poorly. If something uglify the glenn and it is faineant then the glenn is draining. If something damascene the chet and it post the tibold then it uglify the tibold. If something post the glenn then the glenn is assentient. If the chet post the tibold and the tibold is assentient then the chet is poorly. The glenn is poorly.", "logic": "\nPost(glenn, pip)\nPost(glenn, chet)\nDamascene(tibold, glenn)\nAssentient(tibold)\nFaineant(tibold)\nPost(tibold, chet)\nUglify(tibold, glenn)\nUglify(tibold, pip)\nDamascene(pip, tibold)\nUglify(pip, tibold)\nUglify(pip, chet)\nDamascene(chet, tibold)\nEerie(chet)\nPoorly(chet)\nUglify(chet, glenn)\nforall x (Uglify(x, pip) -> Post(pip, glenn))\nforall x (Assentient(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Uglify(x, glenn) and Faineant(x) -> Draining(glenn))\nforall x (Damascene(x, chet) and Post(x, tibold) -> Uglify(x, tibold))\nforall x (Post(x, glenn) -> Assentient(glenn))\nPost(chet, tibold) and Assentient(tibold) -> Poorly(chet)\n\nPoorly(glenn)\n\nUglify(tibold, pip) and forall x (Uglify(x, pip) -> Post(pip, glenn)) -> therefore Post(pip, glenn) Post(pip, glenn) and forall x (Post(x, glenn) -> Assentient(glenn)) -> therefore Assentient(glenn) Assentient(glenn) and forall x (Assentient(x) -> Poorly(x)) -> therefore Poorly(glenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The nell adorn the charlean. The nell adorn the ettie. The thom typify the nell. The thom is sprawling. The thom is dendriform. The thom adorn the ettie. The thom absolve the nell. The thom absolve the charlean. The charlean typify the thom. The charlean absolve the thom. The charlean absolve the ettie. The ettie typify the thom. The ettie is reedlike. The ettie is muddied. The ettie absolve the nell. If something absolve the charlean then the charlean adorn the nell. If something is sprawling then it is muddied. If something absolve the nell and it is dendriform then the nell is humified. If something typify the ettie and it adorn the thom then it absolve the thom. If something adorn the nell then the nell is sprawling. If the ettie adorn the thom and the thom is sprawling then the ettie is muddied. The nell is not muddied.", "logic": "\nAdorn(nell, charlean)\nAdorn(nell, ettie)\nTypify(thom, nell)\nSprawling(thom)\nDendriform(thom)\nAdorn(thom, ettie)\nAbsolve(thom, nell)\nAbsolve(thom, charlean)\nTypify(charlean, thom)\nAbsolve(charlean, thom)\nAbsolve(charlean, ettie)\nTypify(ettie, thom)\nReedlike(ettie)\nMuddied(ettie)\nAbsolve(ettie, nell)\nforall x (Absolve(x, charlean) -> Adorn(charlean, nell))\nforall x (Sprawling(x) -> Muddied(x))\nforall x (Absolve(x, nell) and Dendriform(x) -> Humified(nell))\nforall x (Typify(x, ettie) and Adorn(x, thom) -> Absolve(x, thom))\nforall x (Adorn(x, nell) -> Sprawling(nell))\nAdorn(ettie, thom) and Sprawling(thom) -> Muddied(ettie)\n\nnot Muddied(nell)\n\nAbsolve(thom, charlean) and forall x (Absolve(x, charlean) -> Adorn(charlean, nell)) -> therefore Adorn(charlean, nell) Adorn(charlean, nell) and forall x (Adorn(x, nell) -> Sprawling(nell)) -> therefore Sprawling(nell) Sprawling(nell) and forall x (Sprawling(x) -> Muddied(x)) -> therefore Muddied(nell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The dorri raiment the juliet. The dorri raiment the jolene. The deane vulcanize the dorri. The deane is wireless. The deane is gaunt. The deane raiment the jolene. The deane exile the dorri. The deane exile the juliet. The juliet vulcanize the deane. The juliet exile the deane. The juliet exile the jolene. The jolene vulcanize the deane. The jolene is referable. The jolene is awash. The jolene exile the dorri. If something exile the juliet then the juliet raiment the dorri. If something is wireless then it is awash. If something exile the dorri and it is gaunt then the dorri is afghani. If something vulcanize the jolene and it raiment the deane then it exile the deane. If something raiment the dorri then the dorri is wireless. If the jolene raiment the deane and the deane is wireless then the jolene is awash. The juliet is not awash.", "logic": "\nRaiment(dorri, juliet)\nRaiment(dorri, jolene)\nVulcanize(deane, dorri)\nWireless(deane)\nGaunt(deane)\nRaiment(deane, jolene)\nExile(deane, dorri)\nExile(deane, juliet)\nVulcanize(juliet, deane)\nExile(juliet, deane)\nExile(juliet, jolene)\nVulcanize(jolene, deane)\nReferable(jolene)\nAwash(jolene)\nExile(jolene, dorri)\nforall x (Exile(x, juliet) -> Raiment(juliet, dorri))\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Exile(x, dorri) and Gaunt(x) -> Afghani(dorri))\nforall x (Vulcanize(x, jolene) and Raiment(x, deane) -> Exile(x, deane))\nforall x (Raiment(x, dorri) -> Wireless(dorri))\nRaiment(jolene, deane) and Wireless(deane) -> Awash(jolene)\n\nnot Awash(juliet)\n\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Awash(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The nancie debark the graehme. The nancie debark the curtis. The frayda resile the nancie. The frayda is bovine. The frayda is geometric. The frayda debark the curtis. The frayda excoriate the nancie. The frayda excoriate the graehme. The graehme resile the frayda. The graehme excoriate the frayda. The graehme excoriate the curtis. The curtis resile the frayda. The curtis is marine. The curtis is unsubtle. The curtis excoriate the nancie. If something excoriate the graehme then the graehme debark the nancie. If something is bovine then it is unsubtle. If something excoriate the nancie and it is geometric then the nancie is tomentous. If something resile the curtis and it debark the frayda then it excoriate the frayda. If something debark the nancie then the nancie is bovine. If the curtis debark the frayda and the frayda is bovine then the curtis is unsubtle. The curtis excoriate the frayda.", "logic": "\nDebark(nancie, graehme)\nDebark(nancie, curtis)\nResile(frayda, nancie)\nBovine(frayda)\nGeometric(frayda)\nDebark(frayda, curtis)\nExcoriate(frayda, nancie)\nExcoriate(frayda, graehme)\nResile(graehme, frayda)\nExcoriate(graehme, frayda)\nExcoriate(graehme, curtis)\nResile(curtis, frayda)\nMarine(curtis)\nUnsubtle(curtis)\nExcoriate(curtis, nancie)\nforall x (Excoriate(x, graehme) -> Debark(graehme, nancie))\nforall x (Bovine(x) -> Unsubtle(x))\nforall x (Excoriate(x, nancie) and Geometric(x) -> Tomentous(nancie))\nforall x (Resile(x, curtis) and Debark(x, frayda) -> Excoriate(x, frayda))\nforall x (Debark(x, nancie) -> Bovine(nancie))\nDebark(curtis, frayda) and Bovine(frayda) -> Unsubtle(curtis)\n\nExcoriate(curtis, frayda)\n\nforall x (Resile(x, curtis) and Debark(x, frayda) -> Excoriate(x, frayda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The harley welt the bertine. The harley welt the carlyn. The lorraine wander the harley. The lorraine is ravaging. The lorraine is ongoing. The lorraine welt the carlyn. The lorraine kink the harley. The lorraine kink the bertine. The bertine wander the lorraine. The bertine kink the lorraine. The bertine kink the carlyn. The carlyn wander the lorraine. The carlyn is expiratory. The carlyn is gushing. The carlyn kink the harley. If something kink the bertine then the bertine welt the harley. If something is ravaging then it is gushing. If something kink the harley and it is ongoing then the harley is obligatory. If something wander the carlyn and it welt the lorraine then it kink the lorraine. If something welt the harley then the harley is ravaging. If the carlyn welt the lorraine and the lorraine is ravaging then the carlyn is gushing. The harley does not visit the lorraine.", "logic": "\nWelt(harley, bertine)\nWelt(harley, carlyn)\nWander(lorraine, harley)\nRavaging(lorraine)\nOngoing(lorraine)\nWelt(lorraine, carlyn)\nKink(lorraine, harley)\nKink(lorraine, bertine)\nWander(bertine, lorraine)\nKink(bertine, lorraine)\nKink(bertine, carlyn)\nWander(carlyn, lorraine)\nExpiratory(carlyn)\nGushing(carlyn)\nKink(carlyn, harley)\nforall x (Kink(x, bertine) -> Welt(bertine, harley))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Kink(x, harley) and Ongoing(x) -> Obligatory(harley))\nforall x (Wander(x, carlyn) and Welt(x, lorraine) -> Kink(x, lorraine))\nforall x (Welt(x, harley) -> Ravaging(harley))\nWelt(carlyn, lorraine) and Ravaging(lorraine) -> Gushing(carlyn)\n\nnot Kink(harley, lorraine)\n\nforall x (Wander(x, carlyn) and Welt(x, lorraine) -> Kink(x, lorraine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The zeus normalize the lottie. The zeus normalize the shaw. The fiann bolshevise the zeus. The fiann is scheduled. The fiann is xlvii. The fiann normalize the shaw. The fiann compute the zeus. The fiann compute the lottie. The lottie bolshevise the fiann. The lottie compute the fiann. The lottie compute the shaw. The shaw bolshevise the fiann. The shaw is civilian. The shaw is chivalric. The shaw compute the zeus. If something compute the lottie then the lottie normalize the zeus. If something is scheduled then it is chivalric. If something compute the zeus and it is xlvii then the zeus is downlike. If something bolshevise the shaw and it normalize the fiann then it compute the fiann. If something normalize the zeus then the zeus is scheduled. If the shaw normalize the fiann and the fiann is scheduled then the shaw is chivalric. The fiann compute the fiann.", "logic": "\nNormalize(zeus, lottie)\nNormalize(zeus, shaw)\nBolshevise(fiann, zeus)\nScheduled(fiann)\nXlvii(fiann)\nNormalize(fiann, shaw)\nCompute(fiann, zeus)\nCompute(fiann, lottie)\nBolshevise(lottie, fiann)\nCompute(lottie, fiann)\nCompute(lottie, shaw)\nBolshevise(shaw, fiann)\nCivilian(shaw)\nChivalric(shaw)\nCompute(shaw, zeus)\nforall x (Compute(x, lottie) -> Normalize(lottie, zeus))\nforall x (Scheduled(x) -> Chivalric(x))\nforall x (Compute(x, zeus) and Xlvii(x) -> Downlike(zeus))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, shaw) and Normalize(x, fiann) -> Compute(x, fiann))\nforall x (Normalize(x, zeus) -> Scheduled(zeus))\nNormalize(shaw, fiann) and Scheduled(fiann) -> Chivalric(shaw)\n\nCompute(fiann, fiann)\n\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, shaw) and Normalize(x, fiann) -> Compute(x, fiann)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The dasi tender the elsie. The dasi tender the richard. The lonny samba the dasi. The lonny is small. The lonny is somber. The lonny tender the richard. The lonny handstamp the dasi. The lonny handstamp the elsie. The elsie samba the lonny. The elsie handstamp the lonny. The elsie handstamp the richard. The richard samba the lonny. The richard is inanimate. The richard is dormy. The richard handstamp the dasi. If something handstamp the elsie then the elsie tender the dasi. If something is small then it is dormy. If something handstamp the dasi and it is somber then the dasi is autotypic. If something samba the richard and it tender the lonny then it handstamp the lonny. If something tender the dasi then the dasi is small. If the richard tender the lonny and the lonny is small then the richard is dormy. The dasi is not inanimate.", "logic": "\nTender(dasi, elsie)\nTender(dasi, richard)\nSamba(lonny, dasi)\nSmall(lonny)\nSomber(lonny)\nTender(lonny, richard)\nHandstamp(lonny, dasi)\nHandstamp(lonny, elsie)\nSamba(elsie, lonny)\nHandstamp(elsie, lonny)\nHandstamp(elsie, richard)\nSamba(richard, lonny)\nInanimate(richard)\nDormy(richard)\nHandstamp(richard, dasi)\nforall x (Handstamp(x, elsie) -> Tender(elsie, dasi))\nforall x (Small(x) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Handstamp(x, dasi) and Somber(x) -> Autotypic(dasi))\nforall x (Samba(x, richard) and Tender(x, lonny) -> Handstamp(x, lonny))\nforall x (Tender(x, dasi) -> Small(dasi))\nTender(richard, lonny) and Small(lonny) -> Dormy(richard)\n\nnot Inanimate(dasi)\n\nnot Inanimate(dasi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The kingsly gulp the murielle. The kingsly gulp the janetta. The jay underbid the kingsly. The jay is many. The jay is overheated. The jay gulp the janetta. The jay stint the kingsly. The jay stint the murielle. The murielle underbid the jay. The murielle stint the jay. The murielle stint the janetta. The janetta underbid the jay. The janetta is befogged. The janetta is jumentous. The janetta stint the kingsly. If something stint the murielle then the murielle gulp the kingsly. If something is many then it is jumentous. If something stint the kingsly and it is overheated then the kingsly is incensed. If something underbid the janetta and it gulp the jay then it stint the jay. If something gulp the kingsly then the kingsly is many. If the janetta gulp the jay and the jay is many then the janetta is jumentous. The jay gulp the murielle.", "logic": "\nGulp(kingsly, murielle)\nGulp(kingsly, janetta)\nUnderbid(jay, kingsly)\nMany(jay)\nOverheated(jay)\nGulp(jay, janetta)\nStint(jay, kingsly)\nStint(jay, murielle)\nUnderbid(murielle, jay)\nStint(murielle, jay)\nStint(murielle, janetta)\nUnderbid(janetta, jay)\nBefogged(janetta)\nJumentous(janetta)\nStint(janetta, kingsly)\nforall x (Stint(x, murielle) -> Gulp(murielle, kingsly))\nforall x (Many(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Stint(x, kingsly) and Overheated(x) -> Incensed(kingsly))\nforall x (Underbid(x, janetta) and Gulp(x, jay) -> Stint(x, jay))\nforall x (Gulp(x, kingsly) -> Many(kingsly))\nGulp(janetta, jay) and Many(jay) -> Jumentous(janetta)\n\nGulp(jay, murielle)\n\nGulp(jay, murielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The patrik slump the hasty. The patrik slump the cally. The carine cord the patrik. The carine is roadless. The carine is perceptual. The carine slump the cally. The carine purport the patrik. The carine purport the hasty. The hasty cord the carine. The hasty purport the carine. The hasty purport the cally. The cally cord the carine. The cally is underbred. The cally is feudatory. The cally purport the patrik. If something purport the hasty then the hasty slump the patrik. If something is roadless then it is feudatory. If something purport the patrik and it is perceptual then the patrik is limpid. If something cord the cally and it slump the carine then it purport the carine. If something slump the patrik then the patrik is roadless. If the cally slump the carine and the carine is roadless then the cally is feudatory. The cally does not visit the cally.", "logic": "\nSlump(patrik, hasty)\nSlump(patrik, cally)\nCord(carine, patrik)\nRoadless(carine)\nPerceptual(carine)\nSlump(carine, cally)\nPurport(carine, patrik)\nPurport(carine, hasty)\nCord(hasty, carine)\nPurport(hasty, carine)\nPurport(hasty, cally)\nCord(cally, carine)\nUnderbred(cally)\nFeudatory(cally)\nPurport(cally, patrik)\nforall x (Purport(x, hasty) -> Slump(hasty, patrik))\nforall x (Roadless(x) -> Feudatory(x))\nforall x (Purport(x, patrik) and Perceptual(x) -> Limpid(patrik))\nforall x (Cord(x, cally) and Slump(x, carine) -> Purport(x, carine))\nforall x (Slump(x, patrik) -> Roadless(patrik))\nSlump(cally, carine) and Roadless(carine) -> Feudatory(cally)\n\nnot Purport(cally, cally)\n\nnot Purport(cally, cally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "The chaim steamer the kincaid. The chaim steamer the osmund. The humbert accost the chaim. The humbert is permeant. The humbert is disunited. The humbert steamer the osmund. The humbert suckle the chaim. The humbert suckle the kincaid. The kincaid accost the humbert. The kincaid suckle the humbert. The kincaid suckle the osmund. The osmund accost the humbert. The osmund is sapphire. The osmund is stale. The osmund suckle the chaim. If something suckle the kincaid then the kincaid steamer the chaim. If something is permeant then it is stale. If something suckle the chaim and it is disunited then the chaim is modal. If something accost the osmund and it steamer the humbert then it suckle the humbert. If something steamer the chaim then the chaim is permeant. If the osmund steamer the humbert and the humbert is permeant then the osmund is stale. The chaim accost the osmund.", "logic": "\nSteamer(chaim, kincaid)\nSteamer(chaim, osmund)\nAccost(humbert, chaim)\nPermeant(humbert)\nDisunited(humbert)\nSteamer(humbert, osmund)\nSuckle(humbert, chaim)\nSuckle(humbert, kincaid)\nAccost(kincaid, humbert)\nSuckle(kincaid, humbert)\nSuckle(kincaid, osmund)\nAccost(osmund, humbert)\nSapphire(osmund)\nStale(osmund)\nSuckle(osmund, chaim)\nforall x (Suckle(x, kincaid) -> Steamer(kincaid, chaim))\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Stale(x))\nforall x (Suckle(x, chaim) and Disunited(x) -> Modal(chaim))\nforall x (Accost(x, osmund) and Steamer(x, humbert) -> Suckle(x, humbert))\nforall x (Steamer(x, chaim) -> Permeant(chaim))\nSteamer(osmund, humbert) and Permeant(humbert) -> Stale(osmund)\n\nAccost(chaim, osmund)\n\nAccost(chaim, osmund) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1037"} {"premises": "Lorita is proximate. Shannan is symphonic. Furry things are sidelong. If something is proximate then it is knowing. If Shannan is proximate and Shannan is split then Shannan is inward. If something is sidelong then it is sour. Furry things are symphonic. Rough, inward things are knowing. Lorita is proximate.", "logic": "\nProximate(lorita)\nSymphonic(shannan)\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Sidelong(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Knowing(x))\nProximate(shannan) and Split(shannan) -> Inward(shannan)\nforall x (Sidelong(x) -> Sour(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Symphonic(x))\nforall x (Sour(x) and Inward(x) -> Knowing(x))\n\nProximate(lorita)\n\ntherefore Proximate(lorita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Engracia is grumpy. Lanie is uncultured. Furry things are raiding. If something is grumpy then it is crotchety. If Lanie is grumpy and Lanie is bumpkinly then Lanie is batholitic. If something is raiding then it is intragroup. Furry things are uncultured. Rough, batholitic things are crotchety. Engracia is not grumpy.", "logic": "\nGrumpy(engracia)\nUncultured(lanie)\nforall x (Crotchety(x) -> Raiding(x))\nforall x (Grumpy(x) -> Crotchety(x))\nGrumpy(lanie) and Bumpkinly(lanie) -> Batholitic(lanie)\nforall x (Raiding(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) -> Uncultured(x))\nforall x (Intragroup(x) and Batholitic(x) -> Crotchety(x))\n\nnot Grumpy(engracia)\n\ntherefore Grumpy(engracia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Edmond is unshapely. Elvin is successive. Furry things are whimsical. If something is unshapely then it is cutting. If Elvin is unshapely and Elvin is organized then Elvin is articulate. If something is whimsical then it is priapic. Furry things are successive. Rough, articulate things are cutting. Edmond is cutting.", "logic": "\nUnshapely(edmond)\nSuccessive(elvin)\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> Whimsical(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) -> Cutting(x))\nUnshapely(elvin) and Organized(elvin) -> Articulate(elvin)\nforall x (Whimsical(x) -> Priapic(x))\nforall x (Cutting(x) -> Successive(x))\nforall x (Priapic(x) and Articulate(x) -> Cutting(x))\n\nCutting(edmond)\n\nUnshapely(edmond) and forall x (Unshapely(x) -> Cutting(x)) -> therefore Cutting(edmond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Bard is ghanaian. Dwain is allogamous. Furry things are multiple. If something is ghanaian then it is westside. If Dwain is ghanaian and Dwain is histologic then Dwain is homozygous. If something is multiple then it is voidable. Furry things are allogamous. Rough, homozygous things are westside. Bard is not westside.", "logic": "\nGhanaian(bard)\nAllogamous(dwain)\nforall x (Westside(x) -> Multiple(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Westside(x))\nGhanaian(dwain) and Histologic(dwain) -> Homozygous(dwain)\nforall x (Multiple(x) -> Voidable(x))\nforall x (Westside(x) -> Allogamous(x))\nforall x (Voidable(x) and Homozygous(x) -> Westside(x))\n\nnot Westside(bard)\n\nGhanaian(bard) and forall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Westside(x)) -> therefore Westside(bard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Marlowe is nonnomadic. Valerie is definitive. Furry things are rust. If something is nonnomadic then it is plumate. If Valerie is nonnomadic and Valerie is erosive then Valerie is contiguous. If something is rust then it is backswept. Furry things are definitive. Rough, contiguous things are plumate. Marlowe is rust.", "logic": "\nNonnomadic(marlowe)\nDefinitive(valerie)\nforall x (Plumate(x) -> Rust(x))\nforall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Plumate(x))\nNonnomadic(valerie) and Erosive(valerie) -> Contiguous(valerie)\nforall x (Rust(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Plumate(x) -> Definitive(x))\nforall x (Backswept(x) and Contiguous(x) -> Plumate(x))\n\nRust(marlowe)\n\nNonnomadic(marlowe) and forall x (Nonnomadic(x) -> Plumate(x)) -> therefore Plumate(marlowe) Plumate(marlowe) and forall x (Plumate(x) -> Rust(x)) -> therefore Rust(marlowe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Neel is sunburned. Karlene is mulish. Furry things are unmannerly. If something is sunburned then it is funny. If Karlene is sunburned and Karlene is neuralgic then Karlene is orienting. If something is unmannerly then it is upward. Furry things are mulish. Rough, orienting things are funny. Neel is not mulish.", "logic": "\nSunburned(neel)\nMulish(karlene)\nforall x (Funny(x) -> Unmannerly(x))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) -> Funny(x))\nSunburned(karlene) and Neuralgic(karlene) -> Orienting(karlene)\nforall x (Unmannerly(x) -> Upward(x))\nforall x (Funny(x) -> Mulish(x))\nforall x (Upward(x) and Orienting(x) -> Funny(x))\n\nnot Mulish(neel)\n\nSunburned(neel) and forall x (Sunburned(x) -> Funny(x)) -> therefore Funny(neel) Funny(neel) and forall x (Funny(x) -> Mulish(x)) -> therefore Mulish(neel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Lorilee is prior. Lesya is derived. Furry things are attached. If something is prior then it is unromantic. If Lesya is prior and Lesya is unrealized then Lesya is bunglesome. If something is attached then it is salaried. Furry things are derived. Rough, bunglesome things are unromantic. Lorilee is salaried.", "logic": "\nPrior(lorilee)\nDerived(lesya)\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Prior(x) -> Unromantic(x))\nPrior(lesya) and Unrealized(lesya) -> Bunglesome(lesya)\nforall x (Attached(x) -> Salaried(x))\nforall x (Unromantic(x) -> Derived(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) and Bunglesome(x) -> Unromantic(x))\n\nSalaried(lorilee)\n\nPrior(lorilee) and forall x (Prior(x) -> Unromantic(x)) -> therefore Unromantic(lorilee) Unromantic(lorilee) and forall x (Unromantic(x) -> Attached(x)) -> therefore Attached(lorilee) Attached(lorilee) and forall x (Attached(x) -> Salaried(x)) -> therefore Salaried(lorilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Camala is vacuolated. Lilias is blastemic. Furry things are molal. If something is vacuolated then it is musky. If Lilias is vacuolated and Lilias is ciliate then Lilias is palladian. If something is molal then it is agonising. Furry things are blastemic. Rough, palladian things are musky. Camala is not agonising.", "logic": "\nVacuolated(camala)\nBlastemic(lilias)\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Molal(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Musky(x))\nVacuolated(lilias) and Ciliate(lilias) -> Palladian(lilias)\nforall x (Molal(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Blastemic(x))\nforall x (Agonising(x) and Palladian(x) -> Musky(x))\n\nnot Agonising(camala)\n\nVacuolated(camala) and forall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Musky(x)) -> therefore Musky(camala) Musky(camala) and forall x (Musky(x) -> Molal(x)) -> therefore Molal(camala) Molal(camala) and forall x (Molal(x) -> Agonising(x)) -> therefore Agonising(camala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Debby is ruminant. Mugsy is malapropos. Furry things are danceable. If something is ruminant then it is oriental. If Mugsy is ruminant and Mugsy is punishing then Mugsy is earnest. If something is danceable then it is anestrous. Furry things are malapropos. Rough, earnest things are oriental. Mugsy is not oriental.", "logic": "\nRuminant(debby)\nMalapropos(mugsy)\nforall x (Oriental(x) -> Danceable(x))\nforall x (Ruminant(x) -> Oriental(x))\nRuminant(mugsy) and Punishing(mugsy) -> Earnest(mugsy)\nforall x (Danceable(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nforall x (Oriental(x) -> Malapropos(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) and Earnest(x) -> Oriental(x))\n\nnot Oriental(mugsy)\n\nforall x (Anestrous(x) and Earnest(x) -> Oriental(x)) <- Ruminant(mugsy) and Punishing(mugsy) -> Earnest(mugsy) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Mugsy is knockabout. Liorah is accepting. Furry things are placoid. If something is knockabout then it is archaistic. If Liorah is knockabout and Liorah is fraudulent then Liorah is armless. If something is placoid then it is sloping. Furry things are accepting. Rough, armless things are archaistic. Liorah is placoid.", "logic": "\nKnockabout(mugsy)\nAccepting(liorah)\nforall x (Archaistic(x) -> Placoid(x))\nforall x (Knockabout(x) -> Archaistic(x))\nKnockabout(liorah) and Fraudulent(liorah) -> Armless(liorah)\nforall x (Placoid(x) -> Sloping(x))\nforall x (Archaistic(x) -> Accepting(x))\nforall x (Sloping(x) and Armless(x) -> Archaistic(x))\n\nPlacoid(liorah)\n\nforall x (Archaistic(x) -> Placoid(x)) <- forall x (Sloping(x) and Armless(x) -> Archaistic(x)) <- forall x (Placoid(x) -> Sloping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Matt is biconvex. Madelin is insured. Furry things are edged. If something is biconvex then it is liver. If Madelin is biconvex and Madelin is unwomanly then Madelin is untypical. If something is edged then it is belittling. Furry things are insured. Rough, untypical things are liver. Madelin is not untypical.", "logic": "\nBiconvex(matt)\nInsured(madelin)\nforall x (Liver(x) -> Edged(x))\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> Liver(x))\nBiconvex(madelin) and Unwomanly(madelin) -> Untypical(madelin)\nforall x (Edged(x) -> Belittling(x))\nforall x (Liver(x) -> Insured(x))\nforall x (Belittling(x) and Untypical(x) -> Liver(x))\n\nnot Untypical(madelin)\n\nBiconvex(madelin) and Unwomanly(madelin) -> Untypical(madelin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Xerxes is reversible. Darwin is allegretto. Furry things are behavioral. If something is reversible then it is stagnant. If Darwin is reversible and Darwin is slain then Darwin is doddery. If something is behavioral then it is wriggling. Furry things are allegretto. Rough, doddery things are stagnant. Darwin is wriggling.", "logic": "\nReversible(xerxes)\nAllegretto(darwin)\nforall x (Stagnant(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Reversible(x) -> Stagnant(x))\nReversible(darwin) and Slain(darwin) -> Doddery(darwin)\nforall x (Behavioral(x) -> Wriggling(x))\nforall x (Stagnant(x) -> Allegretto(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) and Doddery(x) -> Stagnant(x))\n\nWriggling(darwin)\n\nforall x (Behavioral(x) -> Wriggling(x)) <- forall x (Stagnant(x) -> Behavioral(x)) <- forall x (Reversible(x) -> Stagnant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Latrena is messy. Emalee is hanoverian. Furry things are subsequent. If something is messy then it is spotty. If Emalee is messy and Emalee is coronary then Emalee is cragged. If something is subsequent then it is adulatory. Furry things are hanoverian. Rough, cragged things are spotty. Emalee is not messy.", "logic": "\nMessy(latrena)\nHanoverian(emalee)\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Messy(x) -> Spotty(x))\nMessy(emalee) and Coronary(emalee) -> Cragged(emalee)\nforall x (Subsequent(x) -> Adulatory(x))\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Hanoverian(x))\nforall x (Adulatory(x) and Cragged(x) -> Spotty(x))\n\nnot Messy(emalee)\n\nnot Messy(emalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Ilona is upstanding. Remington is legal. Furry things are somalian. If something is upstanding then it is strangled. If Remington is upstanding and Remington is despiteful then Remington is ascetical. If something is somalian then it is occidental. Furry things are legal. Rough, ascetical things are strangled. Ilona is despiteful.", "logic": "\nUpstanding(ilona)\nLegal(remington)\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> Somalian(x))\nforall x (Upstanding(x) -> Strangled(x))\nUpstanding(remington) and Despiteful(remington) -> Ascetical(remington)\nforall x (Somalian(x) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> Legal(x))\nforall x (Occidental(x) and Ascetical(x) -> Strangled(x))\n\nDespiteful(ilona)\n\nDespiteful(ilona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "See is makeshift. Bryana is tattling. Furry things are milch. If something is makeshift then it is drugged. If Bryana is makeshift and Bryana is individual then Bryana is needled. If something is milch then it is unbendable. Furry things are tattling. Rough, needled things are drugged. Bryana is not individual.", "logic": "\nMakeshift(see)\nTattling(bryana)\nforall x (Drugged(x) -> Milch(x))\nforall x (Makeshift(x) -> Drugged(x))\nMakeshift(bryana) and Individual(bryana) -> Needled(bryana)\nforall x (Milch(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Drugged(x) -> Tattling(x))\nforall x (Unbendable(x) and Needled(x) -> Drugged(x))\n\nnot Individual(bryana)\n\nnot Individual(bryana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "Corrina is saucy. Nolie is seraphic. Furry things are lunar. If something is saucy then it is cursed. If Nolie is saucy and Nolie is lithe then Nolie is standard. If something is lunar then it is refractory. Furry things are seraphic. Rough, standard things are cursed. Corrina is standard.", "logic": "\nSaucy(corrina)\nSeraphic(nolie)\nforall x (Cursed(x) -> Lunar(x))\nforall x (Saucy(x) -> Cursed(x))\nSaucy(nolie) and Lithe(nolie) -> Standard(nolie)\nforall x (Lunar(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Cursed(x) -> Seraphic(x))\nforall x (Refractory(x) and Standard(x) -> Cursed(x))\n\nStandard(corrina)\n\nStandard(corrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-737"} {"premises": "The mehetabel does not chase the reuben. The mehetabel rosin the davidde. The mehetabel span the reuben. The mehetabel is varying. The mehetabel is median. The reuben rosin the mehetabel. The reuben rosin the davidde. The reuben span the davidde. The reuben is bantering. The reuben is paranasal. The reuben flip the davidde. The davidde rosin the mehetabel. The davidde span the mehetabel. The davidde is waxen. The davidde does not visit the mehetabel. The davidde flip the reuben. If someone span the reuben then they are bantering. If someone rosin the reuben and they do not chase the mehetabel then they are bantering. If the reuben span the davidde and the davidde is bantering then the reuben is waxen. If someone span the reuben then they visit the mehetabel. If someone is paranasal then they eat the reuben. If the davidde span the mehetabel and the mehetabel does not visit the davidde then the mehetabel span the davidde. If the reuben flip the mehetabel then the mehetabel does not eat the davidde. If someone rosin the davidde and they do not visit the reuben then the reuben is not bantering. The reuben rosin the mehetabel.", "logic": "\nnot Rosin(mehetabel, reuben)\nRosin(mehetabel, davidde)\nSpan(mehetabel, reuben)\nVarying(mehetabel)\nMedian(mehetabel)\nRosin(reuben, mehetabel)\nRosin(reuben, davidde)\nSpan(reuben, davidde)\nBantering(reuben)\nParanasal(reuben)\nFlip(reuben, davidde)\nRosin(davidde, mehetabel)\nSpan(davidde, mehetabel)\nWaxen(davidde)\nnot Flip(davidde, mehetabel)\nFlip(davidde, reuben)\nforall x (Span(x, reuben) -> Bantering(x))\nforall x (Rosin(x, reuben) and not Rosin(x, mehetabel) -> Bantering(x))\nSpan(reuben, davidde) and Bantering(davidde) -> Waxen(reuben)\nforall x (Span(x, reuben) -> Flip(x, mehetabel))\nforall x (Paranasal(x) -> Span(x, reuben))\nSpan(davidde, mehetabel) and not Flip(mehetabel, davidde) -> Span(mehetabel, davidde)\nFlip(reuben, mehetabel) -> not Span(mehetabel, davidde)\nforall x (Rosin(x, davidde) and not Flip(x, reuben) -> not Bantering(reuben))\n\nRosin(reuben, mehetabel)\n\ntherefore Rosin(reuben, mehetabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The isabelita does not chase the shell. The isabelita sphacelate the sybille. The isabelita unbalance the shell. The isabelita is unclothed. The isabelita is soviet. The shell sphacelate the isabelita. The shell sphacelate the sybille. The shell unbalance the sybille. The shell is anticipant. The shell is every. The shell ripple the sybille. The sybille sphacelate the isabelita. The sybille unbalance the isabelita. The sybille is jain. The sybille does not visit the isabelita. The sybille ripple the shell. If someone unbalance the shell then they are anticipant. If someone sphacelate the shell and they do not chase the isabelita then they are anticipant. If the shell unbalance the sybille and the sybille is anticipant then the shell is jain. If someone unbalance the shell then they visit the isabelita. If someone is every then they eat the shell. If the sybille unbalance the isabelita and the isabelita does not visit the sybille then the isabelita unbalance the sybille. If the shell ripple the isabelita then the isabelita does not eat the sybille. If someone sphacelate the sybille and they do not visit the shell then the shell is not anticipant. The isabelita does not chase the sybille.", "logic": "\nnot Sphacelate(isabelita, shell)\nSphacelate(isabelita, sybille)\nUnbalance(isabelita, shell)\nUnclothed(isabelita)\nSoviet(isabelita)\nSphacelate(shell, isabelita)\nSphacelate(shell, sybille)\nUnbalance(shell, sybille)\nAnticipant(shell)\nEvery(shell)\nRipple(shell, sybille)\nSphacelate(sybille, isabelita)\nUnbalance(sybille, isabelita)\nJain(sybille)\nnot Ripple(sybille, isabelita)\nRipple(sybille, shell)\nforall x (Unbalance(x, shell) -> Anticipant(x))\nforall x (Sphacelate(x, shell) and not Sphacelate(x, isabelita) -> Anticipant(x))\nUnbalance(shell, sybille) and Anticipant(sybille) -> Jain(shell)\nforall x (Unbalance(x, shell) -> Ripple(x, isabelita))\nforall x (Every(x) -> Unbalance(x, shell))\nUnbalance(sybille, isabelita) and not Ripple(isabelita, sybille) -> Unbalance(isabelita, sybille)\nRipple(shell, isabelita) -> not Unbalance(isabelita, sybille)\nforall x (Sphacelate(x, sybille) and not Ripple(x, shell) -> not Anticipant(shell))\n\nnot Sphacelate(isabelita, sybille)\n\ntherefore Sphacelate(isabelita, sybille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The goldy does not chase the reginald. The goldy uphold the emera. The goldy derail the reginald. The goldy is occidental. The goldy is surgical. The reginald uphold the goldy. The reginald uphold the emera. The reginald derail the emera. The reginald is defeated. The reginald is laborious. The reginald carnalise the emera. The emera uphold the goldy. The emera derail the goldy. The emera is medieval. The emera does not visit the goldy. The emera carnalise the reginald. If someone derail the reginald then they are defeated. If someone uphold the reginald and they do not chase the goldy then they are defeated. If the reginald derail the emera and the emera is defeated then the reginald is medieval. If someone derail the reginald then they visit the goldy. If someone is laborious then they eat the reginald. If the emera derail the goldy and the goldy does not visit the emera then the goldy derail the emera. If the reginald carnalise the goldy then the goldy does not eat the emera. If someone uphold the emera and they do not visit the reginald then the reginald is not defeated. The goldy carnalise the goldy.", "logic": "\nnot Uphold(goldy, reginald)\nUphold(goldy, emera)\nDerail(goldy, reginald)\nOccidental(goldy)\nSurgical(goldy)\nUphold(reginald, goldy)\nUphold(reginald, emera)\nDerail(reginald, emera)\nDefeated(reginald)\nLaborious(reginald)\nCarnalise(reginald, emera)\nUphold(emera, goldy)\nDerail(emera, goldy)\nMedieval(emera)\nnot Carnalise(emera, goldy)\nCarnalise(emera, reginald)\nforall x (Derail(x, reginald) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Uphold(x, reginald) and not Uphold(x, goldy) -> Defeated(x))\nDerail(reginald, emera) and Defeated(emera) -> Medieval(reginald)\nforall x (Derail(x, reginald) -> Carnalise(x, goldy))\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Derail(x, reginald))\nDerail(emera, goldy) and not Carnalise(goldy, emera) -> Derail(goldy, emera)\nCarnalise(reginald, goldy) -> not Derail(goldy, emera)\nforall x (Uphold(x, emera) and not Carnalise(x, reginald) -> not Defeated(reginald))\n\nCarnalise(goldy, goldy)\n\nDerail(goldy, reginald) and forall x (Derail(x, reginald) -> Carnalise(x, goldy)) -> therefore Carnalise(goldy, goldy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The silva does not chase the zorah. The silva cherish the franny. The silva resign the zorah. The silva is energetic. The silva is arachnoid. The zorah cherish the silva. The zorah cherish the franny. The zorah resign the franny. The zorah is intended. The zorah is disused. The zorah threaten the franny. The franny cherish the silva. The franny resign the silva. The franny is delicious. The franny does not visit the silva. The franny threaten the zorah. If someone resign the zorah then they are intended. If someone cherish the zorah and they do not chase the silva then they are intended. If the zorah resign the franny and the franny is intended then the zorah is delicious. If someone resign the zorah then they visit the silva. If someone is disused then they eat the zorah. If the franny resign the silva and the silva does not visit the franny then the silva resign the franny. If the zorah threaten the silva then the silva does not eat the franny. If someone cherish the franny and they do not visit the zorah then the zorah is not intended. The zorah does not eat the zorah.", "logic": "\nnot Cherish(silva, zorah)\nCherish(silva, franny)\nResign(silva, zorah)\nEnergetic(silva)\nArachnoid(silva)\nCherish(zorah, silva)\nCherish(zorah, franny)\nResign(zorah, franny)\nIntended(zorah)\nDisused(zorah)\nThreaten(zorah, franny)\nCherish(franny, silva)\nResign(franny, silva)\nDelicious(franny)\nnot Threaten(franny, silva)\nThreaten(franny, zorah)\nforall x (Resign(x, zorah) -> Intended(x))\nforall x (Cherish(x, zorah) and not Cherish(x, silva) -> Intended(x))\nResign(zorah, franny) and Intended(franny) -> Delicious(zorah)\nforall x (Resign(x, zorah) -> Threaten(x, silva))\nforall x (Disused(x) -> Resign(x, zorah))\nResign(franny, silva) and not Threaten(silva, franny) -> Resign(silva, franny)\nThreaten(zorah, silva) -> not Resign(silva, franny)\nforall x (Cherish(x, franny) and not Threaten(x, zorah) -> not Intended(zorah))\n\nnot Resign(zorah, zorah)\n\nDisused(zorah) and forall x (Disused(x) -> Resign(x, zorah)) -> therefore Resign(zorah, zorah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The marlena does not chase the othilia. The marlena type the wade. The marlena teeter the othilia. The marlena is distressed. The marlena is homogenous. The othilia type the marlena. The othilia type the wade. The othilia teeter the wade. The othilia is coruscant. The othilia is addible. The othilia flub the wade. The wade type the marlena. The wade teeter the marlena. The wade is deceitful. The wade does not visit the marlena. The wade flub the othilia. If someone teeter the othilia then they are coruscant. If someone type the othilia and they do not chase the marlena then they are coruscant. If the othilia teeter the wade and the wade is coruscant then the othilia is deceitful. If someone teeter the othilia then they visit the marlena. If someone is addible then they eat the othilia. If the wade teeter the marlena and the marlena does not visit the wade then the marlena teeter the wade. If the othilia flub the marlena then the marlena does not eat the wade. If someone type the wade and they do not visit the othilia then the othilia is not coruscant. The othilia flub the marlena.", "logic": "\nnot Type(marlena, othilia)\nType(marlena, wade)\nTeeter(marlena, othilia)\nDistressed(marlena)\nHomogenous(marlena)\nType(othilia, marlena)\nType(othilia, wade)\nTeeter(othilia, wade)\nCoruscant(othilia)\nAddible(othilia)\nFlub(othilia, wade)\nType(wade, marlena)\nTeeter(wade, marlena)\nDeceitful(wade)\nnot Flub(wade, marlena)\nFlub(wade, othilia)\nforall x (Teeter(x, othilia) -> Coruscant(x))\nforall x (Type(x, othilia) and not Type(x, marlena) -> Coruscant(x))\nTeeter(othilia, wade) and Coruscant(wade) -> Deceitful(othilia)\nforall x (Teeter(x, othilia) -> Flub(x, marlena))\nforall x (Addible(x) -> Teeter(x, othilia))\nTeeter(wade, marlena) and not Flub(marlena, wade) -> Teeter(marlena, wade)\nFlub(othilia, marlena) -> not Teeter(marlena, wade)\nforall x (Type(x, wade) and not Flub(x, othilia) -> not Coruscant(othilia))\n\nFlub(othilia, marlena)\n\nAddible(othilia) and forall x (Addible(x) -> Teeter(x, othilia)) -> therefore Teeter(othilia, othilia) Teeter(othilia, othilia) and forall x (Teeter(x, othilia) -> Flub(x, marlena)) -> therefore Flub(othilia, marlena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The eudora does not chase the ethelred. The eudora philander the kissie. The eudora utilise the ethelred. The eudora is inflected. The eudora is bias. The ethelred philander the eudora. The ethelred philander the kissie. The ethelred utilise the kissie. The ethelred is bifoliate. The ethelred is gouty. The ethelred shush the kissie. The kissie philander the eudora. The kissie utilise the eudora. The kissie is abeyant. The kissie does not visit the eudora. The kissie shush the ethelred. If someone utilise the ethelred then they are bifoliate. If someone philander the ethelred and they do not chase the eudora then they are bifoliate. If the ethelred utilise the kissie and the kissie is bifoliate then the ethelred is abeyant. If someone utilise the ethelred then they visit the eudora. If someone is gouty then they eat the ethelred. If the kissie utilise the eudora and the eudora does not visit the kissie then the eudora utilise the kissie. If the ethelred shush the eudora then the eudora does not eat the kissie. If someone philander the kissie and they do not visit the ethelred then the ethelred is not bifoliate. The ethelred does not visit the eudora.", "logic": "\nnot Philander(eudora, ethelred)\nPhilander(eudora, kissie)\nUtilise(eudora, ethelred)\nInflected(eudora)\nBias(eudora)\nPhilander(ethelred, eudora)\nPhilander(ethelred, kissie)\nUtilise(ethelred, kissie)\nBifoliate(ethelred)\nGouty(ethelred)\nShush(ethelred, kissie)\nPhilander(kissie, eudora)\nUtilise(kissie, eudora)\nAbeyant(kissie)\nnot Shush(kissie, eudora)\nShush(kissie, ethelred)\nforall x (Utilise(x, ethelred) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Philander(x, ethelred) and not Philander(x, eudora) -> Bifoliate(x))\nUtilise(ethelred, kissie) and Bifoliate(kissie) -> Abeyant(ethelred)\nforall x (Utilise(x, ethelred) -> Shush(x, eudora))\nforall x (Gouty(x) -> Utilise(x, ethelred))\nUtilise(kissie, eudora) and not Shush(eudora, kissie) -> Utilise(eudora, kissie)\nShush(ethelred, eudora) -> not Utilise(eudora, kissie)\nforall x (Philander(x, kissie) and not Shush(x, ethelred) -> not Bifoliate(ethelred))\n\nnot Shush(ethelred, eudora)\n\nGouty(ethelred) and forall x (Gouty(x) -> Utilise(x, ethelred)) -> therefore Utilise(ethelred, ethelred) Utilise(ethelred, ethelred) and forall x (Utilise(x, ethelred) -> Shush(x, eudora)) -> therefore Shush(ethelred, eudora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The giralda does not chase the auberta. The giralda caseate the muire. The giralda admix the auberta. The giralda is racemose. The giralda is embedded. The auberta caseate the giralda. The auberta caseate the muire. The auberta admix the muire. The auberta is tall. The auberta is acid. The auberta mute the muire. The muire caseate the giralda. The muire admix the giralda. The muire is rupicolous. The muire does not visit the giralda. The muire mute the auberta. If someone admix the auberta then they are tall. If someone caseate the auberta and they do not chase the giralda then they are tall. If the auberta admix the muire and the muire is tall then the auberta is rupicolous. If someone admix the auberta then they visit the giralda. If someone is acid then they eat the auberta. If the muire admix the giralda and the giralda does not visit the muire then the giralda admix the muire. If the auberta mute the giralda then the giralda does not eat the muire. If someone caseate the muire and they do not visit the auberta then the auberta is not tall. The giralda does not eat the muire.", "logic": "\nnot Caseate(giralda, auberta)\nCaseate(giralda, muire)\nAdmix(giralda, auberta)\nRacemose(giralda)\nEmbedded(giralda)\nCaseate(auberta, giralda)\nCaseate(auberta, muire)\nAdmix(auberta, muire)\nTall(auberta)\nAcid(auberta)\nMute(auberta, muire)\nCaseate(muire, giralda)\nAdmix(muire, giralda)\nRupicolous(muire)\nnot Mute(muire, giralda)\nMute(muire, auberta)\nforall x (Admix(x, auberta) -> Tall(x))\nforall x (Caseate(x, auberta) and not Caseate(x, giralda) -> Tall(x))\nAdmix(auberta, muire) and Tall(muire) -> Rupicolous(auberta)\nforall x (Admix(x, auberta) -> Mute(x, giralda))\nforall x (Acid(x) -> Admix(x, auberta))\nAdmix(muire, giralda) and not Mute(giralda, muire) -> Admix(giralda, muire)\nMute(auberta, giralda) -> not Admix(giralda, muire)\nforall x (Caseate(x, muire) and not Mute(x, auberta) -> not Tall(auberta))\n\nnot Admix(giralda, muire)\n\nAcid(auberta) and forall x (Acid(x) -> Admix(x, auberta)) -> therefore Admix(auberta, auberta) Admix(auberta, auberta) and forall x (Admix(x, auberta) -> Mute(x, giralda)) -> therefore Mute(auberta, giralda) Mute(auberta, giralda) and Mute(auberta, giralda) -> not Admix(giralda, muire) -> therefore not Admix(giralda, muire)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The trixy does not chase the nissa. The trixy birch the carmelia. The trixy trample the nissa. The trixy is unhumorous. The trixy is erect. The nissa birch the trixy. The nissa birch the carmelia. The nissa trample the carmelia. The nissa is casual. The nissa is buff. The nissa publicize the carmelia. The carmelia birch the trixy. The carmelia trample the trixy. The carmelia is goosey. The carmelia does not visit the trixy. The carmelia publicize the nissa. If someone trample the nissa then they are casual. If someone birch the nissa and they do not chase the trixy then they are casual. If the nissa trample the carmelia and the carmelia is casual then the nissa is goosey. If someone trample the nissa then they visit the trixy. If someone is buff then they eat the nissa. If the carmelia trample the trixy and the trixy does not visit the carmelia then the trixy trample the carmelia. If the nissa publicize the trixy then the trixy does not eat the carmelia. If someone birch the carmelia and they do not visit the nissa then the nissa is not casual. The trixy trample the carmelia.", "logic": "\nnot Birch(trixy, nissa)\nBirch(trixy, carmelia)\nTrample(trixy, nissa)\nUnhumorous(trixy)\nErect(trixy)\nBirch(nissa, trixy)\nBirch(nissa, carmelia)\nTrample(nissa, carmelia)\nCasual(nissa)\nBuff(nissa)\nPublicize(nissa, carmelia)\nBirch(carmelia, trixy)\nTrample(carmelia, trixy)\nGoosey(carmelia)\nnot Publicize(carmelia, trixy)\nPublicize(carmelia, nissa)\nforall x (Trample(x, nissa) -> Casual(x))\nforall x (Birch(x, nissa) and not Birch(x, trixy) -> Casual(x))\nTrample(nissa, carmelia) and Casual(carmelia) -> Goosey(nissa)\nforall x (Trample(x, nissa) -> Publicize(x, trixy))\nforall x (Buff(x) -> Trample(x, nissa))\nTrample(carmelia, trixy) and not Publicize(trixy, carmelia) -> Trample(trixy, carmelia)\nPublicize(nissa, trixy) -> not Trample(trixy, carmelia)\nforall x (Birch(x, carmelia) and not Publicize(x, nissa) -> not Casual(nissa))\n\nTrample(trixy, carmelia)\n\nBuff(nissa) and forall x (Buff(x) -> Trample(x, nissa)) -> therefore Trample(nissa, nissa) Trample(nissa, nissa) and forall x (Trample(x, nissa) -> Publicize(x, trixy)) -> therefore Publicize(nissa, trixy) Publicize(nissa, trixy) and Publicize(nissa, trixy) -> not Trample(trixy, carmelia) -> therefore not Trample(trixy, carmelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The agretha does not chase the daria. The agretha dice the malinde. The agretha summons the daria. The agretha is boisterous. The agretha is regardful. The daria dice the agretha. The daria dice the malinde. The daria summons the malinde. The daria is bronze. The daria is astonied. The daria cloak the malinde. The malinde dice the agretha. The malinde summons the agretha. The malinde is rainless. The malinde does not visit the agretha. The malinde cloak the daria. If someone summons the daria then they are bronze. If someone dice the daria and they do not chase the agretha then they are bronze. If the daria summons the malinde and the malinde is bronze then the daria is rainless. If someone summons the daria then they visit the agretha. If someone is astonied then they eat the daria. If the malinde summons the agretha and the agretha does not visit the malinde then the agretha summons the malinde. If the daria cloak the agretha then the agretha does not eat the malinde. If someone dice the malinde and they do not visit the daria then the daria is not bronze. The daria is not rainless.", "logic": "\nnot Dice(agretha, daria)\nDice(agretha, malinde)\nSummons(agretha, daria)\nBoisterous(agretha)\nRegardful(agretha)\nDice(daria, agretha)\nDice(daria, malinde)\nSummons(daria, malinde)\nBronze(daria)\nAstonied(daria)\nCloak(daria, malinde)\nDice(malinde, agretha)\nSummons(malinde, agretha)\nRainless(malinde)\nnot Cloak(malinde, agretha)\nCloak(malinde, daria)\nforall x (Summons(x, daria) -> Bronze(x))\nforall x (Dice(x, daria) and not Dice(x, agretha) -> Bronze(x))\nSummons(daria, malinde) and Bronze(malinde) -> Rainless(daria)\nforall x (Summons(x, daria) -> Cloak(x, agretha))\nforall x (Astonied(x) -> Summons(x, daria))\nSummons(malinde, agretha) and not Cloak(agretha, malinde) -> Summons(agretha, malinde)\nCloak(daria, agretha) -> not Summons(agretha, malinde)\nforall x (Dice(x, malinde) and not Cloak(x, daria) -> not Bronze(daria))\n\nnot Rainless(daria)\n\nSummons(daria, malinde) and Bronze(malinde) -> Rainless(daria) <- forall x (Summons(x, daria) -> Bronze(x)) <- forall x (Astonied(x) -> Summons(x, daria)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The aloysia does not chase the jae. The aloysia exalt the lindsey. The aloysia relax the jae. The aloysia is select. The aloysia is pink. The jae exalt the aloysia. The jae exalt the lindsey. The jae relax the lindsey. The jae is stalemated. The jae is seminude. The jae glitter the lindsey. The lindsey exalt the aloysia. The lindsey relax the aloysia. The lindsey is retro. The lindsey does not visit the aloysia. The lindsey glitter the jae. If someone relax the jae then they are stalemated. If someone exalt the jae and they do not chase the aloysia then they are stalemated. If the jae relax the lindsey and the lindsey is stalemated then the jae is retro. If someone relax the jae then they visit the aloysia. If someone is seminude then they eat the jae. If the lindsey relax the aloysia and the aloysia does not visit the lindsey then the aloysia relax the lindsey. If the jae glitter the aloysia then the aloysia does not eat the lindsey. If someone exalt the lindsey and they do not visit the jae then the jae is not stalemated. The lindsey relax the jae.", "logic": "\nnot Exalt(aloysia, jae)\nExalt(aloysia, lindsey)\nRelax(aloysia, jae)\nSelect(aloysia)\nPink(aloysia)\nExalt(jae, aloysia)\nExalt(jae, lindsey)\nRelax(jae, lindsey)\nStalemated(jae)\nSeminude(jae)\nGlitter(jae, lindsey)\nExalt(lindsey, aloysia)\nRelax(lindsey, aloysia)\nRetro(lindsey)\nnot Glitter(lindsey, aloysia)\nGlitter(lindsey, jae)\nforall x (Relax(x, jae) -> Stalemated(x))\nforall x (Exalt(x, jae) and not Exalt(x, aloysia) -> Stalemated(x))\nRelax(jae, lindsey) and Stalemated(lindsey) -> Retro(jae)\nforall x (Relax(x, jae) -> Glitter(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Relax(x, jae))\nRelax(lindsey, aloysia) and not Glitter(aloysia, lindsey) -> Relax(aloysia, lindsey)\nGlitter(jae, aloysia) -> not Relax(aloysia, lindsey)\nforall x (Exalt(x, lindsey) and not Glitter(x, jae) -> not Stalemated(jae))\n\nRelax(lindsey, jae)\n\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Relax(x, jae)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The solly does not chase the sharity. The solly deepen the carole. The solly underscore the sharity. The solly is reigning. The solly is hurt. The sharity deepen the solly. The sharity deepen the carole. The sharity underscore the carole. The sharity is cuprous. The sharity is alive. The sharity berry the carole. The carole deepen the solly. The carole underscore the solly. The carole is junior. The carole does not visit the solly. The carole berry the sharity. If someone underscore the sharity then they are cuprous. If someone deepen the sharity and they do not chase the solly then they are cuprous. If the sharity underscore the carole and the carole is cuprous then the sharity is junior. If someone underscore the sharity then they visit the solly. If someone is alive then they eat the sharity. If the carole underscore the solly and the solly does not visit the carole then the solly underscore the carole. If the sharity berry the solly then the solly does not eat the carole. If someone deepen the carole and they do not visit the sharity then the sharity is not cuprous. The carole is not cuprous.", "logic": "\nnot Deepen(solly, sharity)\nDeepen(solly, carole)\nUnderscore(solly, sharity)\nReigning(solly)\nHurt(solly)\nDeepen(sharity, solly)\nDeepen(sharity, carole)\nUnderscore(sharity, carole)\nCuprous(sharity)\nAlive(sharity)\nBerry(sharity, carole)\nDeepen(carole, solly)\nUnderscore(carole, solly)\nJunior(carole)\nnot Berry(carole, solly)\nBerry(carole, sharity)\nforall x (Underscore(x, sharity) -> Cuprous(x))\nforall x (Deepen(x, sharity) and not Deepen(x, solly) -> Cuprous(x))\nUnderscore(sharity, carole) and Cuprous(carole) -> Junior(sharity)\nforall x (Underscore(x, sharity) -> Berry(x, solly))\nforall x (Alive(x) -> Underscore(x, sharity))\nUnderscore(carole, solly) and not Berry(solly, carole) -> Underscore(solly, carole)\nBerry(sharity, solly) -> not Underscore(solly, carole)\nforall x (Deepen(x, carole) and not Berry(x, sharity) -> not Cuprous(sharity))\n\nnot Cuprous(carole)\n\nforall x (Underscore(x, sharity) -> Cuprous(x)) <- forall x (Alive(x) -> Underscore(x, sharity)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The nicola does not chase the elissa. The nicola demonize the frederich. The nicola mute the elissa. The nicola is momentary. The nicola is screwball. The elissa demonize the nicola. The elissa demonize the frederich. The elissa mute the frederich. The elissa is bullate. The elissa is genital. The elissa sass the frederich. The frederich demonize the nicola. The frederich mute the nicola. The frederich is daylong. The frederich does not visit the nicola. The frederich sass the elissa. If someone mute the elissa then they are bullate. If someone demonize the elissa and they do not chase the nicola then they are bullate. If the elissa mute the frederich and the frederich is bullate then the elissa is daylong. If someone mute the elissa then they visit the nicola. If someone is genital then they eat the elissa. If the frederich mute the nicola and the nicola does not visit the frederich then the nicola mute the frederich. If the elissa sass the nicola then the nicola does not eat the frederich. If someone demonize the frederich and they do not visit the elissa then the elissa is not bullate. The elissa sass the elissa.", "logic": "\nnot Demonize(nicola, elissa)\nDemonize(nicola, frederich)\nMute(nicola, elissa)\nMomentary(nicola)\nScrewball(nicola)\nDemonize(elissa, nicola)\nDemonize(elissa, frederich)\nMute(elissa, frederich)\nBullate(elissa)\nGenital(elissa)\nSass(elissa, frederich)\nDemonize(frederich, nicola)\nMute(frederich, nicola)\nDaylong(frederich)\nnot Sass(frederich, nicola)\nSass(frederich, elissa)\nforall x (Mute(x, elissa) -> Bullate(x))\nforall x (Demonize(x, elissa) and not Demonize(x, nicola) -> Bullate(x))\nMute(elissa, frederich) and Bullate(frederich) -> Daylong(elissa)\nforall x (Mute(x, elissa) -> Sass(x, nicola))\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Mute(x, elissa))\nMute(frederich, nicola) and not Sass(nicola, frederich) -> Mute(nicola, frederich)\nSass(elissa, nicola) -> not Mute(nicola, frederich)\nforall x (Demonize(x, frederich) and not Sass(x, elissa) -> not Bullate(elissa))\n\nSass(elissa, elissa)\n\nSass(elissa, elissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The dulciana does not chase the ravi. The dulciana brook the paulo. The dulciana scroll the ravi. The dulciana is vivid. The dulciana is redeeming. The ravi brook the dulciana. The ravi brook the paulo. The ravi scroll the paulo. The ravi is nacreous. The ravi is attractive. The ravi scarf the paulo. The paulo brook the dulciana. The paulo scroll the dulciana. The paulo is insular. The paulo does not visit the dulciana. The paulo scarf the ravi. If someone scroll the ravi then they are nacreous. If someone brook the ravi and they do not chase the dulciana then they are nacreous. If the ravi scroll the paulo and the paulo is nacreous then the ravi is insular. If someone scroll the ravi then they visit the dulciana. If someone is attractive then they eat the ravi. If the paulo scroll the dulciana and the dulciana does not visit the paulo then the dulciana scroll the paulo. If the ravi scarf the dulciana then the dulciana does not eat the paulo. If someone brook the paulo and they do not visit the ravi then the ravi is not nacreous. The dulciana does not visit the ravi.", "logic": "\nnot Brook(dulciana, ravi)\nBrook(dulciana, paulo)\nScroll(dulciana, ravi)\nVivid(dulciana)\nRedeeming(dulciana)\nBrook(ravi, dulciana)\nBrook(ravi, paulo)\nScroll(ravi, paulo)\nNacreous(ravi)\nAttractive(ravi)\nScarf(ravi, paulo)\nBrook(paulo, dulciana)\nScroll(paulo, dulciana)\nInsular(paulo)\nnot Scarf(paulo, dulciana)\nScarf(paulo, ravi)\nforall x (Scroll(x, ravi) -> Nacreous(x))\nforall x (Brook(x, ravi) and not Brook(x, dulciana) -> Nacreous(x))\nScroll(ravi, paulo) and Nacreous(paulo) -> Insular(ravi)\nforall x (Scroll(x, ravi) -> Scarf(x, dulciana))\nforall x (Attractive(x) -> Scroll(x, ravi))\nScroll(paulo, dulciana) and not Scarf(dulciana, paulo) -> Scroll(dulciana, paulo)\nScarf(ravi, dulciana) -> not Scroll(dulciana, paulo)\nforall x (Brook(x, paulo) and not Scarf(x, ravi) -> not Nacreous(ravi))\n\nnot Scarf(dulciana, ravi)\n\nnot Scarf(dulciana, ravi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The sacha does not chase the oscar. The sacha suppurate the yehudit. The sacha accurse the oscar. The sacha is extramural. The sacha is expectable. The oscar suppurate the sacha. The oscar suppurate the yehudit. The oscar accurse the yehudit. The oscar is womanish. The oscar is lurid. The oscar announce the yehudit. The yehudit suppurate the sacha. The yehudit accurse the sacha. The yehudit is ascending. The yehudit does not visit the sacha. The yehudit announce the oscar. If someone accurse the oscar then they are womanish. If someone suppurate the oscar and they do not chase the sacha then they are womanish. If the oscar accurse the yehudit and the yehudit is womanish then the oscar is ascending. If someone accurse the oscar then they visit the sacha. If someone is lurid then they eat the oscar. If the yehudit accurse the sacha and the sacha does not visit the yehudit then the sacha accurse the yehudit. If the oscar announce the sacha then the sacha does not eat the yehudit. If someone suppurate the yehudit and they do not visit the oscar then the oscar is not womanish. The sacha accurse the sacha.", "logic": "\nnot Suppurate(sacha, oscar)\nSuppurate(sacha, yehudit)\nAccurse(sacha, oscar)\nExtramural(sacha)\nExpectable(sacha)\nSuppurate(oscar, sacha)\nSuppurate(oscar, yehudit)\nAccurse(oscar, yehudit)\nWomanish(oscar)\nLurid(oscar)\nAnnounce(oscar, yehudit)\nSuppurate(yehudit, sacha)\nAccurse(yehudit, sacha)\nAscending(yehudit)\nnot Announce(yehudit, sacha)\nAnnounce(yehudit, oscar)\nforall x (Accurse(x, oscar) -> Womanish(x))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, oscar) and not Suppurate(x, sacha) -> Womanish(x))\nAccurse(oscar, yehudit) and Womanish(yehudit) -> Ascending(oscar)\nforall x (Accurse(x, oscar) -> Announce(x, sacha))\nforall x (Lurid(x) -> Accurse(x, oscar))\nAccurse(yehudit, sacha) and not Announce(sacha, yehudit) -> Accurse(sacha, yehudit)\nAnnounce(oscar, sacha) -> not Accurse(sacha, yehudit)\nforall x (Suppurate(x, yehudit) and not Announce(x, oscar) -> not Womanish(oscar))\n\nAccurse(sacha, sacha)\n\nAccurse(sacha, sacha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The nerti does not chase the cabrina. The nerti streak the forster. The nerti saccharify the cabrina. The nerti is customary. The nerti is unnoticed. The cabrina streak the nerti. The cabrina streak the forster. The cabrina saccharify the forster. The cabrina is mini. The cabrina is gummed. The cabrina verbalize the forster. The forster streak the nerti. The forster saccharify the nerti. The forster is hardbound. The forster does not visit the nerti. The forster verbalize the cabrina. If someone saccharify the cabrina then they are mini. If someone streak the cabrina and they do not chase the nerti then they are mini. If the cabrina saccharify the forster and the forster is mini then the cabrina is hardbound. If someone saccharify the cabrina then they visit the nerti. If someone is gummed then they eat the cabrina. If the forster saccharify the nerti and the nerti does not visit the forster then the nerti saccharify the forster. If the cabrina verbalize the nerti then the nerti does not eat the forster. If someone streak the forster and they do not visit the cabrina then the cabrina is not mini. The nerti is not hardbound.", "logic": "\nnot Streak(nerti, cabrina)\nStreak(nerti, forster)\nSaccharify(nerti, cabrina)\nCustomary(nerti)\nUnnoticed(nerti)\nStreak(cabrina, nerti)\nStreak(cabrina, forster)\nSaccharify(cabrina, forster)\nMini(cabrina)\nGummed(cabrina)\nVerbalize(cabrina, forster)\nStreak(forster, nerti)\nSaccharify(forster, nerti)\nHardbound(forster)\nnot Verbalize(forster, nerti)\nVerbalize(forster, cabrina)\nforall x (Saccharify(x, cabrina) -> Mini(x))\nforall x (Streak(x, cabrina) and not Streak(x, nerti) -> Mini(x))\nSaccharify(cabrina, forster) and Mini(forster) -> Hardbound(cabrina)\nforall x (Saccharify(x, cabrina) -> Verbalize(x, nerti))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Saccharify(x, cabrina))\nSaccharify(forster, nerti) and not Verbalize(nerti, forster) -> Saccharify(nerti, forster)\nVerbalize(cabrina, nerti) -> not Saccharify(nerti, forster)\nforall x (Streak(x, forster) and not Verbalize(x, cabrina) -> not Mini(cabrina))\n\nnot Hardbound(nerti)\n\nnot Hardbound(nerti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "The penrod does not chase the suzann. The penrod nurse the hana. The penrod pressurize the suzann. The penrod is divinatory. The penrod is autoerotic. The suzann nurse the penrod. The suzann nurse the hana. The suzann pressurize the hana. The suzann is cereal. The suzann is oxidative. The suzann cluster the hana. The hana nurse the penrod. The hana pressurize the penrod. The hana is gossamer. The hana does not visit the penrod. The hana cluster the suzann. If someone pressurize the suzann then they are cereal. If someone nurse the suzann and they do not chase the penrod then they are cereal. If the suzann pressurize the hana and the hana is cereal then the suzann is gossamer. If someone pressurize the suzann then they visit the penrod. If someone is oxidative then they eat the suzann. If the hana pressurize the penrod and the penrod does not visit the hana then the penrod pressurize the hana. If the suzann cluster the penrod then the penrod does not eat the hana. If someone nurse the hana and they do not visit the suzann then the suzann is not cereal. The penrod nurse the penrod.", "logic": "\nnot Nurse(penrod, suzann)\nNurse(penrod, hana)\nPressurize(penrod, suzann)\nDivinatory(penrod)\nAutoerotic(penrod)\nNurse(suzann, penrod)\nNurse(suzann, hana)\nPressurize(suzann, hana)\nCereal(suzann)\nOxidative(suzann)\nCluster(suzann, hana)\nNurse(hana, penrod)\nPressurize(hana, penrod)\nGossamer(hana)\nnot Cluster(hana, penrod)\nCluster(hana, suzann)\nforall x (Pressurize(x, suzann) -> Cereal(x))\nforall x (Nurse(x, suzann) and not Nurse(x, penrod) -> Cereal(x))\nPressurize(suzann, hana) and Cereal(hana) -> Gossamer(suzann)\nforall x (Pressurize(x, suzann) -> Cluster(x, penrod))\nforall x (Oxidative(x) -> Pressurize(x, suzann))\nPressurize(hana, penrod) and not Cluster(penrod, hana) -> Pressurize(penrod, hana)\nCluster(suzann, penrod) -> not Pressurize(penrod, hana)\nforall x (Nurse(x, hana) and not Cluster(x, suzann) -> not Cereal(suzann))\n\nNurse(penrod, penrod)\n\nNurse(penrod, penrod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-286"} {"premises": "Sandra is discovered. Pandora is vagabond. Pandora is puzzling. If something is unchaste then it is not neglected. If something is unrealised and discovered then it is neglected. If Sandra is not vagabond then Sandra is neglected. If something is puzzling then it is patrician. If something is unrealised then it is unchaste. All vagabond things are unrealised. Sandra is discovered.", "logic": "\nDiscovered(sandra)\nVagabond(pandora)\nPuzzling(pandora)\nforall x (Unchaste(x) -> not Neglected(x))\nforall x (Unrealised(x) and Discovered(x) -> Neglected(x))\nnot Vagabond(sandra) -> Neglected(sandra)\nforall x (Puzzling(x) -> Patrician(x))\nforall x (Unrealised(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Vagabond(x) -> Unrealised(x))\n\nDiscovered(sandra)\n\ntherefore Discovered(sandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Erena is serial. Zea is resistible. Zea is mitotic. If something is unendowed then it is not husbandly. If something is snug and serial then it is husbandly. If Erena is not resistible then Erena is husbandly. If something is mitotic then it is rutted. If something is snug then it is unendowed. All resistible things are snug. Zea is not resistible.", "logic": "\nSerial(erena)\nResistible(zea)\nMitotic(zea)\nforall x (Unendowed(x) -> not Husbandly(x))\nforall x (Snug(x) and Serial(x) -> Husbandly(x))\nnot Resistible(erena) -> Husbandly(erena)\nforall x (Mitotic(x) -> Rutted(x))\nforall x (Snug(x) -> Unendowed(x))\nforall x (Resistible(x) -> Snug(x))\n\nnot Resistible(zea)\n\ntherefore Resistible(zea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Novelia is abatic. Izak is spoilt. Izak is geothermic. If something is cybernetic then it is not egoistic. If something is crushed and abatic then it is egoistic. If Novelia is not spoilt then Novelia is egoistic. If something is geothermic then it is moresque. If something is crushed then it is cybernetic. All spoilt things are crushed. Izak is crushed.", "logic": "\nAbatic(novelia)\nSpoilt(izak)\nGeothermic(izak)\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) -> not Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Crushed(x) and Abatic(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nnot Spoilt(novelia) -> Egoistic(novelia)\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Moresque(x))\nforall x (Crushed(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\nforall x (Spoilt(x) -> Crushed(x))\n\nCrushed(izak)\n\nSpoilt(izak) and forall x (Spoilt(x) -> Crushed(x)) -> therefore Crushed(izak)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Daryn is facetious. Eulalie is sweptwing. Eulalie is reachable. If something is acritical then it is not irrelevant. If something is monetary and facetious then it is irrelevant. If Daryn is not sweptwing then Daryn is irrelevant. If something is reachable then it is unlearned. If something is monetary then it is acritical. All sweptwing things are monetary. Eulalie is not unlearned.", "logic": "\nFacetious(daryn)\nSweptwing(eulalie)\nReachable(eulalie)\nforall x (Acritical(x) -> not Irrelevant(x))\nforall x (Monetary(x) and Facetious(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\nnot Sweptwing(daryn) -> Irrelevant(daryn)\nforall x (Reachable(x) -> Unlearned(x))\nforall x (Monetary(x) -> Acritical(x))\nforall x (Sweptwing(x) -> Monetary(x))\n\nnot Unlearned(eulalie)\n\nReachable(eulalie) and forall x (Reachable(x) -> Unlearned(x)) -> therefore Unlearned(eulalie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Rafaelia is semestral. Orlando is fortuitous. Orlando is baptised. If something is slicked then it is not bistered. If something is wavy and semestral then it is bistered. If Rafaelia is not fortuitous then Rafaelia is bistered. If something is baptised then it is dominical. If something is wavy then it is slicked. All fortuitous things are wavy. Orlando is slicked.", "logic": "\nSemestral(rafaelia)\nFortuitous(orlando)\nBaptised(orlando)\nforall x (Slicked(x) -> not Bistered(x))\nforall x (Wavy(x) and Semestral(x) -> Bistered(x))\nnot Fortuitous(rafaelia) -> Bistered(rafaelia)\nforall x (Baptised(x) -> Dominical(x))\nforall x (Wavy(x) -> Slicked(x))\nforall x (Fortuitous(x) -> Wavy(x))\n\nSlicked(orlando)\n\nFortuitous(orlando) and forall x (Fortuitous(x) -> Wavy(x)) -> therefore Wavy(orlando) Wavy(orlando) and forall x (Wavy(x) -> Slicked(x)) -> therefore Slicked(orlando)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Carline is germy. Demetria is vital. Demetria is choky. If something is null then it is not heavenward. If something is stirring and germy then it is heavenward. If Carline is not vital then Carline is heavenward. If something is choky then it is cetaceous. If something is stirring then it is null. All vital things are stirring. Demetria is not null.", "logic": "\nGermy(carline)\nVital(demetria)\nChoky(demetria)\nforall x (Null(x) -> not Heavenward(x))\nforall x (Stirring(x) and Germy(x) -> Heavenward(x))\nnot Vital(carline) -> Heavenward(carline)\nforall x (Choky(x) -> Cetaceous(x))\nforall x (Stirring(x) -> Null(x))\nforall x (Vital(x) -> Stirring(x))\n\nnot Null(demetria)\n\nVital(demetria) and forall x (Vital(x) -> Stirring(x)) -> therefore Stirring(demetria) Stirring(demetria) and forall x (Stirring(x) -> Null(x)) -> therefore Null(demetria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Kellen is inflamed. Ferguson is semisolid. Ferguson is scanty. If something is offensive then it is not applied. If something is lessened and inflamed then it is applied. If Kellen is not semisolid then Kellen is applied. If something is scanty then it is russian. If something is lessened then it is offensive. All semisolid things are lessened. Ferguson is not applied.", "logic": "\nInflamed(kellen)\nSemisolid(ferguson)\nScanty(ferguson)\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> not Applied(x))\nforall x (Lessened(x) and Inflamed(x) -> Applied(x))\nnot Semisolid(kellen) -> Applied(kellen)\nforall x (Scanty(x) -> Russian(x))\nforall x (Lessened(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Semisolid(x) -> Lessened(x))\n\nnot Applied(ferguson)\n\nSemisolid(ferguson) and forall x (Semisolid(x) -> Lessened(x)) -> therefore Lessened(ferguson) Lessened(ferguson) and forall x (Lessened(x) -> Offensive(x)) -> therefore Offensive(ferguson) Offensive(ferguson) and forall x (Offensive(x) -> not Applied(x)) -> therefore not Applied(ferguson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Agretha is unforced. Willyt is jetting. Willyt is snowbound. If something is forbearing then it is not sprawly. If something is tropic and unforced then it is sprawly. If Agretha is not jetting then Agretha is sprawly. If something is snowbound then it is rhymeless. If something is tropic then it is forbearing. All jetting things are tropic. Willyt is sprawly.", "logic": "\nUnforced(agretha)\nJetting(willyt)\nSnowbound(willyt)\nforall x (Forbearing(x) -> not Sprawly(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) and Unforced(x) -> Sprawly(x))\nnot Jetting(agretha) -> Sprawly(agretha)\nforall x (Snowbound(x) -> Rhymeless(x))\nforall x (Tropic(x) -> Forbearing(x))\nforall x (Jetting(x) -> Tropic(x))\n\nSprawly(willyt)\n\nJetting(willyt) and forall x (Jetting(x) -> Tropic(x)) -> therefore Tropic(willyt) Tropic(willyt) and forall x (Tropic(x) -> Forbearing(x)) -> therefore Forbearing(willyt) Forbearing(willyt) and forall x (Forbearing(x) -> not Sprawly(x)) -> therefore not Sprawly(willyt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Tiphany is perfected. Helaina is inbuilt. Helaina is dexterous. If something is metallic then it is not perfervid. If something is biserrate and perfected then it is perfervid. If Tiphany is not inbuilt then Tiphany is perfervid. If something is dexterous then it is positive. If something is biserrate then it is metallic. All inbuilt things are biserrate. Tiphany is not biserrate.", "logic": "\nPerfected(tiphany)\nInbuilt(helaina)\nDexterous(helaina)\nforall x (Metallic(x) -> not Perfervid(x))\nforall x (Biserrate(x) and Perfected(x) -> Perfervid(x))\nnot Inbuilt(tiphany) -> Perfervid(tiphany)\nforall x (Dexterous(x) -> Positive(x))\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> Metallic(x))\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) -> Biserrate(x))\n\nnot Biserrate(tiphany)\n\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) -> Biserrate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Elliott is refulgent. Ruthi is anti. Ruthi is halcyon. If something is nonviscid then it is not ionized. If something is viatical and refulgent then it is ionized. If Elliott is not anti then Elliott is ionized. If something is halcyon then it is congruous. If something is viatical then it is nonviscid. All anti things are viatical. Elliott is nonviscid.", "logic": "\nRefulgent(elliott)\nAnti(ruthi)\nHalcyon(ruthi)\nforall x (Nonviscid(x) -> not Ionized(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) and Refulgent(x) -> Ionized(x))\nnot Anti(elliott) -> Ionized(elliott)\nforall x (Halcyon(x) -> Congruous(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) -> Nonviscid(x))\nforall x (Anti(x) -> Viatical(x))\n\nNonviscid(elliott)\n\nforall x (Viatical(x) -> Nonviscid(x)) <- forall x (Anti(x) -> Viatical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Reta is unsweet. Yolande is crocked. Yolande is every. If something is multilevel then it is not untidy. If something is thermoset and unsweet then it is untidy. If Reta is not crocked then Reta is untidy. If something is every then it is dressy. If something is thermoset then it is multilevel. All crocked things are thermoset. Reta is not dressy.", "logic": "\nUnsweet(reta)\nCrocked(yolande)\nEvery(yolande)\nforall x (Multilevel(x) -> not Untidy(x))\nforall x (Thermoset(x) and Unsweet(x) -> Untidy(x))\nnot Crocked(reta) -> Untidy(reta)\nforall x (Every(x) -> Dressy(x))\nforall x (Thermoset(x) -> Multilevel(x))\nforall x (Crocked(x) -> Thermoset(x))\n\nnot Dressy(reta)\n\nforall x (Every(x) -> Dressy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Frazier is accusive. Walden is rushy. Walden is afflicted. If something is beechen then it is not tubular. If something is larval and accusive then it is tubular. If Frazier is not rushy then Frazier is tubular. If something is afflicted then it is juxtaposed. If something is larval then it is beechen. All rushy things are larval. Frazier is tubular.", "logic": "\nAccusive(frazier)\nRushy(walden)\nAfflicted(walden)\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> not Tubular(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) and Accusive(x) -> Tubular(x))\nnot Rushy(frazier) -> Tubular(frazier)\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Juxtaposed(x))\nforall x (Larval(x) -> Beechen(x))\nforall x (Rushy(x) -> Larval(x))\n\nTubular(frazier)\n\nforall x (Larval(x) and Accusive(x) -> Tubular(x)) <- forall x (Rushy(x) -> Larval(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Rodolph is dimmed. Lamb is jesuit. Lamb is fated. If something is cruciate then it is not churning. If something is surmounted and dimmed then it is churning. If Rodolph is not jesuit then Rodolph is churning. If something is fated then it is chained. If something is surmounted then it is cruciate. All jesuit things are surmounted. Lamb is not dimmed.", "logic": "\nDimmed(rodolph)\nJesuit(lamb)\nFated(lamb)\nforall x (Cruciate(x) -> not Churning(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) and Dimmed(x) -> Churning(x))\nnot Jesuit(rodolph) -> Churning(rodolph)\nforall x (Fated(x) -> Chained(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) -> Surmounted(x))\n\nnot Dimmed(lamb)\n\nnot Dimmed(lamb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Cal is impersonal. Brigitta is arcane. Brigitta is norman. If something is incursive then it is not unflagging. If something is cracking and impersonal then it is unflagging. If Cal is not arcane then Cal is unflagging. If something is norman then it is watery. If something is cracking then it is incursive. All arcane things are cracking. Cal is arcane.", "logic": "\nImpersonal(cal)\nArcane(brigitta)\nNorman(brigitta)\nforall x (Incursive(x) -> not Unflagging(x))\nforall x (Cracking(x) and Impersonal(x) -> Unflagging(x))\nnot Arcane(cal) -> Unflagging(cal)\nforall x (Norman(x) -> Watery(x))\nforall x (Cracking(x) -> Incursive(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) -> Cracking(x))\n\nArcane(cal)\n\nArcane(cal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Celie is unspecific. Celie is untiring. Courtenay is unspecific. Courtenay is figurative. Joane is unspecific. Aldis is figurative. Aldis is swazi. All oxonian things are swazi. If something is innocent and untiring then it is swazi. If something is unspecific and untiring then it is swazi. Round things are untiring. All oxonian things are innocent. All unspecific things are untiring. If something is swazi then it is innocent. If Courtenay is untiring then Courtenay is unspecific. Celie is unspecific.", "logic": "\nUnspecific(celie)\nUntiring(celie)\nUnspecific(courtenay)\nFigurative(courtenay)\nUnspecific(joane)\nFigurative(aldis)\nSwazi(aldis)\nforall x (Oxonian(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Innocent(x) and Untiring(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) and Untiring(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Swazi(x) -> Untiring(x))\nforall x (Oxonian(x) -> Innocent(x))\nforall x (Unspecific(x) -> Untiring(x))\nforall x (Swazi(x) -> Innocent(x))\nUntiring(courtenay) -> Unspecific(courtenay)\n\nUnspecific(celie)\n\ntherefore Unspecific(celie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Stephana is weeny. Stephana is occluded. Mozelle is weeny. Mozelle is pupillary. Dalia is weeny. Jacynth is pupillary. Jacynth is dosed. All unadapted things are dosed. If something is mythic and occluded then it is dosed. If something is weeny and occluded then it is dosed. Round things are occluded. All unadapted things are mythic. All weeny things are occluded. If something is dosed then it is mythic. If Mozelle is occluded then Mozelle is weeny. Mozelle is not weeny.", "logic": "\nWeeny(stephana)\nOccluded(stephana)\nWeeny(mozelle)\nPupillary(mozelle)\nWeeny(dalia)\nPupillary(jacynth)\nDosed(jacynth)\nforall x (Unadapted(x) -> Dosed(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) and Occluded(x) -> Dosed(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) and Occluded(x) -> Dosed(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) -> Occluded(x))\nforall x (Unadapted(x) -> Mythic(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) -> Occluded(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) -> Mythic(x))\nOccluded(mozelle) -> Weeny(mozelle)\n\nnot Weeny(mozelle)\n\ntherefore Weeny(mozelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Kessia is monotypic. Kessia is fungicidal. Harvey is monotypic. Harvey is pelecypod. Aindrea is monotypic. Perl is pelecypod. Perl is empathetic. All piecemeal things are empathetic. If something is beakless and fungicidal then it is empathetic. If something is monotypic and fungicidal then it is empathetic. Round things are fungicidal. All piecemeal things are beakless. All monotypic things are fungicidal. If something is empathetic then it is beakless. If Harvey is fungicidal then Harvey is monotypic. Perl is beakless.", "logic": "\nMonotypic(kessia)\nFungicidal(kessia)\nMonotypic(harvey)\nPelecypod(harvey)\nMonotypic(aindrea)\nPelecypod(perl)\nEmpathetic(perl)\nforall x (Piecemeal(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Beakless(x) and Fungicidal(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and Fungicidal(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Piecemeal(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Beakless(x))\nFungicidal(harvey) -> Monotypic(harvey)\n\nBeakless(perl)\n\nEmpathetic(perl) and forall x (Empathetic(x) -> Beakless(x)) -> therefore Beakless(perl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Dorine is stoned. Dorine is teary. Wilt is stoned. Wilt is finable. Dee is stoned. Sofie is finable. Sofie is categorial. All botanical things are categorial. If something is provoking and teary then it is categorial. If something is stoned and teary then it is categorial. Round things are teary. All botanical things are provoking. All stoned things are teary. If something is categorial then it is provoking. If Wilt is teary then Wilt is stoned. Wilt is not teary.", "logic": "\nStoned(dorine)\nTeary(dorine)\nStoned(wilt)\nFinable(wilt)\nStoned(dee)\nFinable(sofie)\nCategorial(sofie)\nforall x (Botanical(x) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Provoking(x) and Teary(x) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Stoned(x) and Teary(x) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Categorial(x) -> Teary(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) -> Provoking(x))\nforall x (Stoned(x) -> Teary(x))\nforall x (Categorial(x) -> Provoking(x))\nTeary(wilt) -> Stoned(wilt)\n\nnot Teary(wilt)\n\nStoned(wilt) and forall x (Stoned(x) -> Teary(x)) -> therefore Teary(wilt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Berkley is extrinsic. Berkley is portrayed. Ramona is extrinsic. Ramona is austral. Vinita is extrinsic. Marlene is austral. Marlene is fogged. All vixenish things are fogged. If something is technical and portrayed then it is fogged. If something is extrinsic and portrayed then it is fogged. Round things are portrayed. All vixenish things are technical. All extrinsic things are portrayed. If something is fogged then it is technical. If Ramona is portrayed then Ramona is extrinsic. Ramona is fogged.", "logic": "\nExtrinsic(berkley)\nPortrayed(berkley)\nExtrinsic(ramona)\nAustral(ramona)\nExtrinsic(vinita)\nAustral(marlene)\nFogged(marlene)\nforall x (Vixenish(x) -> Fogged(x))\nforall x (Technical(x) and Portrayed(x) -> Fogged(x))\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) and Portrayed(x) -> Fogged(x))\nforall x (Fogged(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) -> Technical(x))\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nforall x (Fogged(x) -> Technical(x))\nPortrayed(ramona) -> Extrinsic(ramona)\n\nFogged(ramona)\n\nExtrinsic(ramona) and forall x (Extrinsic(x) -> Portrayed(x)) -> therefore Portrayed(ramona) Extrinsic(ramona) and Portrayed(ramona) and forall x (Extrinsic(x) and Portrayed(x) -> Fogged(x)) -> therefore Fogged(ramona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Spense is noteworthy. Spense is pastel. Jeralee is noteworthy. Jeralee is annual. Raf is noteworthy. Ardelis is annual. Ardelis is croupy. All optional things are croupy. If something is inadequate and pastel then it is croupy. If something is noteworthy and pastel then it is croupy. Round things are pastel. All optional things are inadequate. All noteworthy things are pastel. If something is croupy then it is inadequate. If Jeralee is pastel then Jeralee is noteworthy. Jeralee is not croupy.", "logic": "\nNoteworthy(spense)\nPastel(spense)\nNoteworthy(jeralee)\nAnnual(jeralee)\nNoteworthy(raf)\nAnnual(ardelis)\nCroupy(ardelis)\nforall x (Optional(x) -> Croupy(x))\nforall x (Inadequate(x) and Pastel(x) -> Croupy(x))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) and Pastel(x) -> Croupy(x))\nforall x (Croupy(x) -> Pastel(x))\nforall x (Optional(x) -> Inadequate(x))\nforall x (Noteworthy(x) -> Pastel(x))\nforall x (Croupy(x) -> Inadequate(x))\nPastel(jeralee) -> Noteworthy(jeralee)\n\nnot Croupy(jeralee)\n\nNoteworthy(jeralee) and forall x (Noteworthy(x) -> Pastel(x)) -> therefore Pastel(jeralee) Noteworthy(jeralee) and Pastel(jeralee) and forall x (Noteworthy(x) and Pastel(x) -> Croupy(x)) -> therefore Croupy(jeralee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Oreste is adscript. Oreste is feisty. Brana is adscript. Brana is lobated. Norris is adscript. Cyril is lobated. Cyril is bulbous. All calico things are bulbous. If something is forthright and feisty then it is bulbous. If something is adscript and feisty then it is bulbous. Round things are feisty. All calico things are forthright. All adscript things are feisty. If something is bulbous then it is forthright. If Brana is feisty then Brana is adscript. Brana is forthright.", "logic": "\nAdscript(oreste)\nFeisty(oreste)\nAdscript(brana)\nLobated(brana)\nAdscript(norris)\nLobated(cyril)\nBulbous(cyril)\nforall x (Calico(x) -> Bulbous(x))\nforall x (Forthright(x) and Feisty(x) -> Bulbous(x))\nforall x (Adscript(x) and Feisty(x) -> Bulbous(x))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) -> Feisty(x))\nforall x (Calico(x) -> Forthright(x))\nforall x (Adscript(x) -> Feisty(x))\nforall x (Bulbous(x) -> Forthright(x))\nFeisty(brana) -> Adscript(brana)\n\nForthright(brana)\n\nAdscript(brana) and forall x (Adscript(x) -> Feisty(x)) -> therefore Feisty(brana) Adscript(brana) and Feisty(brana) and forall x (Adscript(x) and Feisty(x) -> Bulbous(x)) -> therefore Bulbous(brana) Bulbous(brana) and forall x (Bulbous(x) -> Forthright(x)) -> therefore Forthright(brana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Guthrie is ovate. Guthrie is unsleeping. Nerti is ovate. Nerti is papery. Luciana is ovate. Brian is papery. Brian is cylindric. All dented things are cylindric. If something is shameless and unsleeping then it is cylindric. If something is ovate and unsleeping then it is cylindric. Round things are unsleeping. All dented things are shameless. All ovate things are unsleeping. If something is cylindric then it is shameless. If Nerti is unsleeping then Nerti is ovate. Nerti is not shameless.", "logic": "\nOvate(guthrie)\nUnsleeping(guthrie)\nOvate(nerti)\nPapery(nerti)\nOvate(luciana)\nPapery(brian)\nCylindric(brian)\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Cylindric(x))\nforall x (Shameless(x) and Unsleeping(x) -> Cylindric(x))\nforall x (Ovate(x) and Unsleeping(x) -> Cylindric(x))\nforall x (Cylindric(x) -> Unsleeping(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Shameless(x))\nforall x (Ovate(x) -> Unsleeping(x))\nforall x (Cylindric(x) -> Shameless(x))\nUnsleeping(nerti) -> Ovate(nerti)\n\nnot Shameless(nerti)\n\nOvate(nerti) and forall x (Ovate(x) -> Unsleeping(x)) -> therefore Unsleeping(nerti) Ovate(nerti) and Unsleeping(nerti) and forall x (Ovate(x) and Unsleeping(x) -> Cylindric(x)) -> therefore Cylindric(nerti) Cylindric(nerti) and forall x (Cylindric(x) -> Shameless(x)) -> therefore Shameless(nerti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Zalman is corky. Zalman is thunderous. Claudio is corky. Claudio is uremic. Zolly is corky. Oreste is uremic. Oreste is quelled. All steep things are quelled. If something is moroccan and thunderous then it is quelled. If something is corky and thunderous then it is quelled. Round things are thunderous. All steep things are moroccan. All corky things are thunderous. If something is quelled then it is moroccan. If Claudio is thunderous then Claudio is corky. Zolly is not uremic.", "logic": "\nCorky(zalman)\nThunderous(zalman)\nCorky(claudio)\nUremic(claudio)\nCorky(zolly)\nUremic(oreste)\nQuelled(oreste)\nforall x (Steep(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Moroccan(x) and Thunderous(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) and Thunderous(x) -> Quelled(x))\nforall x (Quelled(x) -> Thunderous(x))\nforall x (Steep(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) -> Thunderous(x))\nforall x (Quelled(x) -> Moroccan(x))\nThunderous(claudio) -> Corky(claudio)\n\nnot Uremic(zolly)\n\nnot Uremic(zolly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Jennifer is posterior. Jennifer is quality. Maureene is posterior. Maureene is comely. Percy is posterior. Adrea is comely. Adrea is pungent. All writhen things are pungent. If something is bowing and quality then it is pungent. If something is posterior and quality then it is pungent. Round things are quality. All writhen things are bowing. All posterior things are quality. If something is pungent then it is bowing. If Maureene is quality then Maureene is posterior. Jennifer is writhen.", "logic": "\nPosterior(jennifer)\nQuality(jennifer)\nPosterior(maureene)\nComely(maureene)\nPosterior(percy)\nComely(adrea)\nPungent(adrea)\nforall x (Writhen(x) -> Pungent(x))\nforall x (Bowing(x) and Quality(x) -> Pungent(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) and Quality(x) -> Pungent(x))\nforall x (Pungent(x) -> Quality(x))\nforall x (Writhen(x) -> Bowing(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Quality(x))\nforall x (Pungent(x) -> Bowing(x))\nQuality(maureene) -> Posterior(maureene)\n\nWrithen(jennifer)\n\nWrithen(jennifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Rozele is overactive. Rozele is fastened. Zonda is overactive. Zonda is maroon. Mirelle is overactive. Grete is maroon. Grete is upbound. All threefold things are upbound. If something is hyperfine and fastened then it is upbound. If something is overactive and fastened then it is upbound. Round things are fastened. All threefold things are hyperfine. All overactive things are fastened. If something is upbound then it is hyperfine. If Zonda is fastened then Zonda is overactive. Zonda is not threefold.", "logic": "\nOveractive(rozele)\nFastened(rozele)\nOveractive(zonda)\nMaroon(zonda)\nOveractive(mirelle)\nMaroon(grete)\nUpbound(grete)\nforall x (Threefold(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Hyperfine(x) and Fastened(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Fastened(x) -> Upbound(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Fastened(x))\nforall x (Threefold(x) -> Hyperfine(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Fastened(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Hyperfine(x))\nFastened(zonda) -> Overactive(zonda)\n\nnot Threefold(zonda)\n\nnot Threefold(zonda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Herminia is treelike. Herminia is zygomatic. Willey is treelike. Willey is ahead. Edna is treelike. Odella is ahead. Odella is blockish. All sensed things are blockish. If something is burnished and zygomatic then it is blockish. If something is treelike and zygomatic then it is blockish. Round things are zygomatic. All sensed things are burnished. All treelike things are zygomatic. If something is blockish then it is burnished. If Willey is zygomatic then Willey is treelike. Edna is sensed.", "logic": "\nTreelike(herminia)\nZygomatic(herminia)\nTreelike(willey)\nAhead(willey)\nTreelike(edna)\nAhead(odella)\nBlockish(odella)\nforall x (Sensed(x) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and Zygomatic(x) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Treelike(x) and Zygomatic(x) -> Blockish(x))\nforall x (Blockish(x) -> Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Sensed(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Treelike(x) -> Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Blockish(x) -> Burnished(x))\nZygomatic(willey) -> Treelike(willey)\n\nSensed(edna)\n\nSensed(edna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Shayna is deterrent. Shayna is gifted. Minetta is deterrent. Minetta is symbiotic. Ami is deterrent. Mellissa is symbiotic. Mellissa is preserved. All xxxi things are preserved. If something is recurvate and gifted then it is preserved. If something is deterrent and gifted then it is preserved. Round things are gifted. All xxxi things are recurvate. All deterrent things are gifted. If something is preserved then it is recurvate. If Minetta is gifted then Minetta is deterrent. Shayna is not kind.", "logic": "\nDeterrent(shayna)\nGifted(shayna)\nDeterrent(minetta)\nSymbiotic(minetta)\nDeterrent(ami)\nSymbiotic(mellissa)\nPreserved(mellissa)\nforall x (Xxxi(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and Gifted(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and Gifted(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Gifted(x))\nforall x (Xxxi(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) -> Gifted(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nGifted(minetta) -> Deterrent(minetta)\n\nnot Kind(shayna)\n\nnot Kind(shayna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Billie is hierarchic. Billie is hateful. Murphy is hierarchic. Murphy is ionised. Luke is hierarchic. Hersh is ionised. Hersh is marshy. All carpeted things are marshy. If something is capitate and hateful then it is marshy. If something is hierarchic and hateful then it is marshy. Round things are hateful. All carpeted things are capitate. All hierarchic things are hateful. If something is marshy then it is capitate. If Murphy is hateful then Murphy is hierarchic. Murphy is kind.", "logic": "\nHierarchic(billie)\nHateful(billie)\nHierarchic(murphy)\nIonised(murphy)\nHierarchic(luke)\nIonised(hersh)\nMarshy(hersh)\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Capitate(x) and Hateful(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Hateful(x) -> Marshy(x))\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Hateful(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Capitate(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) -> Hateful(x))\nforall x (Marshy(x) -> Capitate(x))\nHateful(murphy) -> Hierarchic(murphy)\n\nKind(murphy)\n\nKind(murphy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Meade is sown. Meade is handsome. Aleen is sown. Aleen is bouffant. Cletus is sown. Golda is bouffant. Golda is ataractic. All artificial things are ataractic. If something is eighty and handsome then it is ataractic. If something is sown and handsome then it is ataractic. Round things are handsome. All artificial things are eighty. All sown things are handsome. If something is ataractic then it is eighty. If Aleen is handsome then Aleen is sown. Meade is not bouffant.", "logic": "\nSown(meade)\nHandsome(meade)\nSown(aleen)\nBouffant(aleen)\nSown(cletus)\nBouffant(golda)\nAtaractic(golda)\nforall x (Artificial(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Eighty(x) and Handsome(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) and Handsome(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Ataractic(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Artificial(x) -> Eighty(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) -> Handsome(x))\nforall x (Ataractic(x) -> Eighty(x))\nHandsome(aleen) -> Sown(aleen)\n\nnot Bouffant(meade)\n\nnot Bouffant(meade) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Aharon is cinerary. Aharon is shaping. Meghann is cinerary. Meghann is expert. Theodosia is cinerary. Nicoli is expert. Nicoli is achromous. All lunisolar things are achromous. If something is realized and shaping then it is achromous. If something is cinerary and shaping then it is achromous. Round things are shaping. All lunisolar things are realized. All cinerary things are shaping. If something is achromous then it is realized. If Meghann is shaping then Meghann is cinerary. Nicoli is kind.", "logic": "\nCinerary(aharon)\nShaping(aharon)\nCinerary(meghann)\nExpert(meghann)\nCinerary(theodosia)\nExpert(nicoli)\nAchromous(nicoli)\nforall x (Lunisolar(x) -> Achromous(x))\nforall x (Realized(x) and Shaping(x) -> Achromous(x))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) and Shaping(x) -> Achromous(x))\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Shaping(x))\nforall x (Lunisolar(x) -> Realized(x))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) -> Shaping(x))\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Realized(x))\nShaping(meghann) -> Cinerary(meghann)\n\nKind(nicoli)\n\nKind(nicoli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-210"} {"premises": "Hermann is flatbottom. Hermann is spiteful. Hermann is nonrandom. Hermann is shapely. Hermann is apodal. Ritchie is birchen. Ritchie is shapely. Round things are arcadian. If Ritchie is nonrandom then Ritchie is spiteful. If something is shapely and apodal then it is flatbottom. Furry things are shapely. All birchen, flatbottom things are shapely. If Ritchie is spiteful then Ritchie is apodal. If Ritchie is birchen then Ritchie is spiteful. If Ritchie is shapely and Ritchie is arcadian then Ritchie is nonrandom. Hermann is flatbottom.", "logic": "\nFlatbottom(hermann)\nSpiteful(hermann)\nNonrandom(hermann)\nShapely(hermann)\nApodal(hermann)\nBirchen(ritchie)\nShapely(ritchie)\nforall x (Nonrandom(x) -> Arcadian(x))\nNonrandom(ritchie) -> Spiteful(ritchie)\nforall x (Shapely(x) and Apodal(x) -> Flatbottom(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) and Flatbottom(x) -> Shapely(x))\nSpiteful(ritchie) -> Apodal(ritchie)\nBirchen(ritchie) -> Spiteful(ritchie)\nShapely(ritchie) and Arcadian(ritchie) -> Nonrandom(ritchie)\n\nFlatbottom(hermann)\n\ntherefore Flatbottom(hermann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Nena is romansh. Nena is swish. Nena is tusked. Nena is inst. Nena is shamed. Leodora is vapid. Leodora is inst. Round things are limpid. If Leodora is tusked then Leodora is swish. If something is inst and shamed then it is romansh. Furry things are inst. All vapid, romansh things are inst. If Leodora is swish then Leodora is shamed. If Leodora is vapid then Leodora is swish. If Leodora is inst and Leodora is limpid then Leodora is tusked. Nena is not shamed.", "logic": "\nRomansh(nena)\nSwish(nena)\nTusked(nena)\nInst(nena)\nShamed(nena)\nVapid(leodora)\nInst(leodora)\nforall x (Tusked(x) -> Limpid(x))\nTusked(leodora) -> Swish(leodora)\nforall x (Inst(x) and Shamed(x) -> Romansh(x))\nforall x (Swish(x) -> Inst(x))\nforall x (Vapid(x) and Romansh(x) -> Inst(x))\nSwish(leodora) -> Shamed(leodora)\nVapid(leodora) -> Swish(leodora)\nInst(leodora) and Limpid(leodora) -> Tusked(leodora)\n\nnot Shamed(nena)\n\ntherefore Shamed(nena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Jerold is eparchial. Jerold is diametral. Jerold is pendant. Jerold is benthonic. Jerold is ennobling. Kamila is unborn. Kamila is benthonic. Round things are egocentric. If Kamila is pendant then Kamila is diametral. If something is benthonic and ennobling then it is eparchial. Furry things are benthonic. All unborn, eparchial things are benthonic. If Kamila is diametral then Kamila is ennobling. If Kamila is unborn then Kamila is diametral. If Kamila is benthonic and Kamila is egocentric then Kamila is pendant. Jerold is egocentric.", "logic": "\nEparchial(jerold)\nDiametral(jerold)\nPendant(jerold)\nBenthonic(jerold)\nEnnobling(jerold)\nUnborn(kamila)\nBenthonic(kamila)\nforall x (Pendant(x) -> Egocentric(x))\nPendant(kamila) -> Diametral(kamila)\nforall x (Benthonic(x) and Ennobling(x) -> Eparchial(x))\nforall x (Diametral(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nforall x (Unborn(x) and Eparchial(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nDiametral(kamila) -> Ennobling(kamila)\nUnborn(kamila) -> Diametral(kamila)\nBenthonic(kamila) and Egocentric(kamila) -> Pendant(kamila)\n\nEgocentric(jerold)\n\nPendant(jerold) and forall x (Pendant(x) -> Egocentric(x)) -> therefore Egocentric(jerold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Lorie is hexangular. Lorie is dextrous. Lorie is remittent. Lorie is scrubby. Lorie is singhalese. Josephina is sunken. Josephina is scrubby. Round things are famed. If Josephina is remittent then Josephina is dextrous. If something is scrubby and singhalese then it is hexangular. Furry things are scrubby. All sunken, hexangular things are scrubby. If Josephina is dextrous then Josephina is singhalese. If Josephina is sunken then Josephina is dextrous. If Josephina is scrubby and Josephina is famed then Josephina is remittent. Lorie is not famed.", "logic": "\nHexangular(lorie)\nDextrous(lorie)\nRemittent(lorie)\nScrubby(lorie)\nSinghalese(lorie)\nSunken(josephina)\nScrubby(josephina)\nforall x (Remittent(x) -> Famed(x))\nRemittent(josephina) -> Dextrous(josephina)\nforall x (Scrubby(x) and Singhalese(x) -> Hexangular(x))\nforall x (Dextrous(x) -> Scrubby(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) and Hexangular(x) -> Scrubby(x))\nDextrous(josephina) -> Singhalese(josephina)\nSunken(josephina) -> Dextrous(josephina)\nScrubby(josephina) and Famed(josephina) -> Remittent(josephina)\n\nnot Famed(lorie)\n\nRemittent(lorie) and forall x (Remittent(x) -> Famed(x)) -> therefore Famed(lorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Hillard is glimmery. Hillard is abstemious. Hillard is cavalier. Hillard is mishnaic. Hillard is gentile. Rea is sororal. Rea is mishnaic. Round things are vanished. If Rea is cavalier then Rea is abstemious. If something is mishnaic and gentile then it is glimmery. Furry things are mishnaic. All sororal, glimmery things are mishnaic. If Rea is abstemious then Rea is gentile. If Rea is sororal then Rea is abstemious. If Rea is mishnaic and Rea is vanished then Rea is cavalier. Rea is gentile.", "logic": "\nGlimmery(hillard)\nAbstemious(hillard)\nCavalier(hillard)\nMishnaic(hillard)\nGentile(hillard)\nSororal(rea)\nMishnaic(rea)\nforall x (Cavalier(x) -> Vanished(x))\nCavalier(rea) -> Abstemious(rea)\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) and Gentile(x) -> Glimmery(x))\nforall x (Abstemious(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Sororal(x) and Glimmery(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nAbstemious(rea) -> Gentile(rea)\nSororal(rea) -> Abstemious(rea)\nMishnaic(rea) and Vanished(rea) -> Cavalier(rea)\n\nGentile(rea)\n\nSororal(rea) and Sororal(rea) -> Abstemious(rea) -> therefore Abstemious(rea) Abstemious(rea) and Abstemious(rea) -> Gentile(rea) -> therefore Gentile(rea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Netta is prenominal. Netta is untended. Netta is xxiv. Netta is shortish. Netta is canonical. Sheff is convincing. Sheff is shortish. Round things are screwy. If Sheff is xxiv then Sheff is untended. If something is shortish and canonical then it is prenominal. Furry things are shortish. All convincing, prenominal things are shortish. If Sheff is untended then Sheff is canonical. If Sheff is convincing then Sheff is untended. If Sheff is shortish and Sheff is screwy then Sheff is xxiv. Sheff is not canonical.", "logic": "\nPrenominal(netta)\nUntended(netta)\nXxiv(netta)\nShortish(netta)\nCanonical(netta)\nConvincing(sheff)\nShortish(sheff)\nforall x (Xxiv(x) -> Screwy(x))\nXxiv(sheff) -> Untended(sheff)\nforall x (Shortish(x) and Canonical(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Untended(x) -> Shortish(x))\nforall x (Convincing(x) and Prenominal(x) -> Shortish(x))\nUntended(sheff) -> Canonical(sheff)\nConvincing(sheff) -> Untended(sheff)\nShortish(sheff) and Screwy(sheff) -> Xxiv(sheff)\n\nnot Canonical(sheff)\n\nConvincing(sheff) and Convincing(sheff) -> Untended(sheff) -> therefore Untended(sheff) Untended(sheff) and Untended(sheff) -> Canonical(sheff) -> therefore Canonical(sheff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Ashish is bifilar. Ashish is human. Ashish is blest. Ashish is impromptu. Ashish is prototypic. Beatrice is amateur. Beatrice is impromptu. Round things are pimpled. If Beatrice is blest then Beatrice is human. If something is impromptu and prototypic then it is bifilar. Furry things are impromptu. All amateur, bifilar things are impromptu. If Beatrice is human then Beatrice is prototypic. If Beatrice is amateur then Beatrice is human. If Beatrice is impromptu and Beatrice is pimpled then Beatrice is blest. Beatrice is bifilar.", "logic": "\nBifilar(ashish)\nHuman(ashish)\nBlest(ashish)\nImpromptu(ashish)\nPrototypic(ashish)\nAmateur(beatrice)\nImpromptu(beatrice)\nforall x (Blest(x) -> Pimpled(x))\nBlest(beatrice) -> Human(beatrice)\nforall x (Impromptu(x) and Prototypic(x) -> Bifilar(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> Impromptu(x))\nforall x (Amateur(x) and Bifilar(x) -> Impromptu(x))\nHuman(beatrice) -> Prototypic(beatrice)\nAmateur(beatrice) -> Human(beatrice)\nImpromptu(beatrice) and Pimpled(beatrice) -> Blest(beatrice)\n\nBifilar(beatrice)\n\nAmateur(beatrice) and Amateur(beatrice) -> Human(beatrice) -> therefore Human(beatrice) Human(beatrice) and Human(beatrice) -> Prototypic(beatrice) -> therefore Prototypic(beatrice) Impromptu(beatrice) and Prototypic(beatrice) and forall x (Impromptu(x) and Prototypic(x) -> Bifilar(x)) -> therefore Bifilar(beatrice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Conan is touristy. Conan is unbacked. Conan is dirty. Conan is boracic. Conan is boiled. Beilul is censorious. Beilul is boracic. Round things are openhanded. If Beilul is dirty then Beilul is unbacked. If something is boracic and boiled then it is touristy. Furry things are boracic. All censorious, touristy things are boracic. If Beilul is unbacked then Beilul is boiled. If Beilul is censorious then Beilul is unbacked. If Beilul is boracic and Beilul is openhanded then Beilul is dirty. Beilul is not touristy.", "logic": "\nTouristy(conan)\nUnbacked(conan)\nDirty(conan)\nBoracic(conan)\nBoiled(conan)\nCensorious(beilul)\nBoracic(beilul)\nforall x (Dirty(x) -> Openhanded(x))\nDirty(beilul) -> Unbacked(beilul)\nforall x (Boracic(x) and Boiled(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Unbacked(x) -> Boracic(x))\nforall x (Censorious(x) and Touristy(x) -> Boracic(x))\nUnbacked(beilul) -> Boiled(beilul)\nCensorious(beilul) -> Unbacked(beilul)\nBoracic(beilul) and Openhanded(beilul) -> Dirty(beilul)\n\nnot Touristy(beilul)\n\nCensorious(beilul) and Censorious(beilul) -> Unbacked(beilul) -> therefore Unbacked(beilul) Unbacked(beilul) and Unbacked(beilul) -> Boiled(beilul) -> therefore Boiled(beilul) Boracic(beilul) and Boiled(beilul) and forall x (Boracic(x) and Boiled(x) -> Touristy(x)) -> therefore Touristy(beilul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Shellie is acroscopic. Shellie is homonymic. Shellie is seated. Shellie is arboreal. Shellie is creepy. Waylon is upraised. Waylon is arboreal. Round things are combined. If Waylon is seated then Waylon is homonymic. If something is arboreal and creepy then it is acroscopic. Furry things are arboreal. All upraised, acroscopic things are arboreal. If Waylon is homonymic then Waylon is creepy. If Waylon is upraised then Waylon is homonymic. If Waylon is arboreal and Waylon is combined then Waylon is seated. Waylon is not seated.", "logic": "\nAcroscopic(shellie)\nHomonymic(shellie)\nSeated(shellie)\nArboreal(shellie)\nCreepy(shellie)\nUpraised(waylon)\nArboreal(waylon)\nforall x (Seated(x) -> Combined(x))\nSeated(waylon) -> Homonymic(waylon)\nforall x (Arboreal(x) and Creepy(x) -> Acroscopic(x))\nforall x (Homonymic(x) -> Arboreal(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) and Acroscopic(x) -> Arboreal(x))\nHomonymic(waylon) -> Creepy(waylon)\nUpraised(waylon) -> Homonymic(waylon)\nArboreal(waylon) and Combined(waylon) -> Seated(waylon)\n\nnot Seated(waylon)\n\nArboreal(waylon) and Combined(waylon) -> Seated(waylon) <- forall x (Seated(x) -> Combined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Hernando is aguish. Hernando is lambent. Hernando is cerise. Hernando is misogynous. Hernando is vermilion. Olva is bladelike. Olva is misogynous. Round things are sourish. If Olva is cerise then Olva is lambent. If something is misogynous and vermilion then it is aguish. Furry things are misogynous. All bladelike, aguish things are misogynous. If Olva is lambent then Olva is vermilion. If Olva is bladelike then Olva is lambent. If Olva is misogynous and Olva is sourish then Olva is cerise. Olva is sourish.", "logic": "\nAguish(hernando)\nLambent(hernando)\nCerise(hernando)\nMisogynous(hernando)\nVermilion(hernando)\nBladelike(olva)\nMisogynous(olva)\nforall x (Cerise(x) -> Sourish(x))\nCerise(olva) -> Lambent(olva)\nforall x (Misogynous(x) and Vermilion(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Lambent(x) -> Misogynous(x))\nforall x (Bladelike(x) and Aguish(x) -> Misogynous(x))\nLambent(olva) -> Vermilion(olva)\nBladelike(olva) -> Lambent(olva)\nMisogynous(olva) and Sourish(olva) -> Cerise(olva)\n\nSourish(olva)\n\nforall x (Cerise(x) -> Sourish(x)) <- Misogynous(olva) and Sourish(olva) -> Cerise(olva) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-603"} {"premises": "Channa is olivelike. Fonsie is postmortal. Barbe is postmortal. All tatty things are not inflated. All postmortal, oceangoing things are inflated. If Barbe is oceangoing and Barbe is olivelike then Barbe is not postmortal. All imposed things are tatty. Nice things are imposed. All oceangoing things are imposed. If Channa is oceangoing then Channa is not postmortal. If something is postmortal and olivelike then it is oceangoing. Barbe is postmortal.", "logic": "\nOlivelike(channa)\nPostmortal(fonsie)\nPostmortal(barbe)\nforall x (Tatty(x) -> not Inflated(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Oceangoing(x) -> Inflated(x))\nOceangoing(barbe) and Olivelike(barbe) -> not Postmortal(barbe)\nforall x (Imposed(x) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Oceangoing(x) -> Imposed(x))\nOceangoing(channa) -> not Postmortal(channa)\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Olivelike(x) -> Oceangoing(x))\n\nPostmortal(barbe)\n\ntherefore Postmortal(barbe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Allah is accordant. Royce is crested. Karly is crested. All splenetic things are not crenulated. All crested, reproving things are crenulated. If Karly is reproving and Karly is accordant then Karly is not crested. All mousy things are splenetic. Nice things are mousy. All reproving things are mousy. If Allah is reproving then Allah is not crested. If something is crested and accordant then it is reproving. Allah is not accordant.", "logic": "\nAccordant(allah)\nCrested(royce)\nCrested(karly)\nforall x (Splenetic(x) -> not Crenulated(x))\nforall x (Crested(x) and Reproving(x) -> Crenulated(x))\nReproving(karly) and Accordant(karly) -> not Crested(karly)\nforall x (Mousy(x) -> Splenetic(x))\nforall x (Crested(x) -> Mousy(x))\nforall x (Reproving(x) -> Mousy(x))\nReproving(allah) -> not Crested(allah)\nforall x (Crested(x) and Accordant(x) -> Reproving(x))\n\nnot Accordant(allah)\n\ntherefore Accordant(allah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Finley is level. Gratiana is corporate. Kelsy is corporate. All gassy things are not coercive. All corporate, dear things are coercive. If Kelsy is dear and Kelsy is level then Kelsy is not corporate. All blissful things are gassy. Nice things are blissful. All dear things are blissful. If Finley is dear then Finley is not corporate. If something is corporate and level then it is dear. Kelsy is blissful.", "logic": "\nLevel(finley)\nCorporate(gratiana)\nCorporate(kelsy)\nforall x (Gassy(x) -> not Coercive(x))\nforall x (Corporate(x) and Dear(x) -> Coercive(x))\nDear(kelsy) and Level(kelsy) -> not Corporate(kelsy)\nforall x (Blissful(x) -> Gassy(x))\nforall x (Corporate(x) -> Blissful(x))\nforall x (Dear(x) -> Blissful(x))\nDear(finley) -> not Corporate(finley)\nforall x (Corporate(x) and Level(x) -> Dear(x))\n\nBlissful(kelsy)\n\nCorporate(kelsy) and forall x (Corporate(x) -> Blissful(x)) -> therefore Blissful(kelsy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Bryon is stooped. Genny is frayed. Anstice is frayed. All offhanded things are not comal. All frayed, unhoped things are comal. If Anstice is unhoped and Anstice is stooped then Anstice is not frayed. All floaty things are offhanded. Nice things are floaty. All unhoped things are floaty. If Bryon is unhoped then Bryon is not frayed. If something is frayed and stooped then it is unhoped. Genny is not floaty.", "logic": "\nStooped(bryon)\nFrayed(genny)\nFrayed(anstice)\nforall x (Offhanded(x) -> not Comal(x))\nforall x (Frayed(x) and Unhoped(x) -> Comal(x))\nUnhoped(anstice) and Stooped(anstice) -> not Frayed(anstice)\nforall x (Floaty(x) -> Offhanded(x))\nforall x (Frayed(x) -> Floaty(x))\nforall x (Unhoped(x) -> Floaty(x))\nUnhoped(bryon) -> not Frayed(bryon)\nforall x (Frayed(x) and Stooped(x) -> Unhoped(x))\n\nnot Floaty(genny)\n\nFrayed(genny) and forall x (Frayed(x) -> Floaty(x)) -> therefore Floaty(genny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Gerome is yuman. Aleta is benevolent. Rivi is benevolent. All anosmic things are not royal. All benevolent, satyrical things are royal. If Rivi is satyrical and Rivi is yuman then Rivi is not benevolent. All dyadic things are anosmic. Nice things are dyadic. All satyrical things are dyadic. If Gerome is satyrical then Gerome is not benevolent. If something is benevolent and yuman then it is satyrical. Aleta is anosmic.", "logic": "\nYuman(gerome)\nBenevolent(aleta)\nBenevolent(rivi)\nforall x (Anosmic(x) -> not Royal(x))\nforall x (Benevolent(x) and Satyrical(x) -> Royal(x))\nSatyrical(rivi) and Yuman(rivi) -> not Benevolent(rivi)\nforall x (Dyadic(x) -> Anosmic(x))\nforall x (Benevolent(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nforall x (Satyrical(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nSatyrical(gerome) -> not Benevolent(gerome)\nforall x (Benevolent(x) and Yuman(x) -> Satyrical(x))\n\nAnosmic(aleta)\n\nBenevolent(aleta) and forall x (Benevolent(x) -> Dyadic(x)) -> therefore Dyadic(aleta) Dyadic(aleta) and forall x (Dyadic(x) -> Anosmic(x)) -> therefore Anosmic(aleta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Temp is unlisted. Jenica is habited. Emery is habited. All inky things are not unsuitable. All habited, astomatous things are unsuitable. If Emery is astomatous and Emery is unlisted then Emery is not habited. All prim things are inky. Nice things are prim. All astomatous things are prim. If Temp is astomatous then Temp is not habited. If something is habited and unlisted then it is astomatous. Jenica is not inky.", "logic": "\nUnlisted(temp)\nHabited(jenica)\nHabited(emery)\nforall x (Inky(x) -> not Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Habited(x) and Astomatous(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nAstomatous(emery) and Unlisted(emery) -> not Habited(emery)\nforall x (Prim(x) -> Inky(x))\nforall x (Habited(x) -> Prim(x))\nforall x (Astomatous(x) -> Prim(x))\nAstomatous(temp) -> not Habited(temp)\nforall x (Habited(x) and Unlisted(x) -> Astomatous(x))\n\nnot Inky(jenica)\n\nHabited(jenica) and forall x (Habited(x) -> Prim(x)) -> therefore Prim(jenica) Prim(jenica) and forall x (Prim(x) -> Inky(x)) -> therefore Inky(jenica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Sela is tubelike. Hebert is bionic. Katrina is bionic. All unmined things are not viral. All bionic, messianic things are viral. If Katrina is messianic and Katrina is tubelike then Katrina is not bionic. All conjugated things are unmined. Nice things are conjugated. All messianic things are conjugated. If Sela is messianic then Sela is not bionic. If something is bionic and tubelike then it is messianic. Hebert is not viral.", "logic": "\nTubelike(sela)\nBionic(hebert)\nBionic(katrina)\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> not Viral(x))\nforall x (Bionic(x) and Messianic(x) -> Viral(x))\nMessianic(katrina) and Tubelike(katrina) -> not Bionic(katrina)\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Unmined(x))\nforall x (Bionic(x) -> Conjugated(x))\nforall x (Messianic(x) -> Conjugated(x))\nMessianic(sela) -> not Bionic(sela)\nforall x (Bionic(x) and Tubelike(x) -> Messianic(x))\n\nnot Viral(hebert)\n\nBionic(hebert) and forall x (Bionic(x) -> Conjugated(x)) -> therefore Conjugated(hebert) Conjugated(hebert) and forall x (Conjugated(x) -> Unmined(x)) -> therefore Unmined(hebert) Unmined(hebert) and forall x (Unmined(x) -> not Viral(x)) -> therefore not Viral(hebert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Yank is cycloidal. Thaddeus is convenient. Renate is convenient. All nipping things are not antepartum. All convenient, vaporific things are antepartum. If Renate is vaporific and Renate is cycloidal then Renate is not convenient. All null things are nipping. Nice things are null. All vaporific things are null. If Yank is vaporific then Yank is not convenient. If something is convenient and cycloidal then it is vaporific. Thaddeus is antepartum.", "logic": "\nCycloidal(yank)\nConvenient(thaddeus)\nConvenient(renate)\nforall x (Nipping(x) -> not Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Convenient(x) and Vaporific(x) -> Antepartum(x))\nVaporific(renate) and Cycloidal(renate) -> not Convenient(renate)\nforall x (Null(x) -> Nipping(x))\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Null(x))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) -> Null(x))\nVaporific(yank) -> not Convenient(yank)\nforall x (Convenient(x) and Cycloidal(x) -> Vaporific(x))\n\nAntepartum(thaddeus)\n\nConvenient(thaddeus) and forall x (Convenient(x) -> Null(x)) -> therefore Null(thaddeus) Null(thaddeus) and forall x (Null(x) -> Nipping(x)) -> therefore Nipping(thaddeus) Nipping(thaddeus) and forall x (Nipping(x) -> not Antepartum(x)) -> therefore not Antepartum(thaddeus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Katine is torturing. Thea is male. Sher is male. All infrahuman things are not tortuous. All male, intact things are tortuous. If Sher is intact and Sher is torturing then Sher is not male. All discordant things are infrahuman. Nice things are discordant. All intact things are discordant. If Katine is intact then Katine is not male. If something is male and torturing then it is intact. Katine is not discordant.", "logic": "\nTorturing(katine)\nMale(thea)\nMale(sher)\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> not Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Male(x) and Intact(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nIntact(sher) and Torturing(sher) -> not Male(sher)\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> Infrahuman(x))\nforall x (Male(x) -> Discordant(x))\nforall x (Intact(x) -> Discordant(x))\nIntact(katine) -> not Male(katine)\nforall x (Male(x) and Torturing(x) -> Intact(x))\n\nnot Discordant(katine)\n\nforall x (Intact(x) -> Discordant(x)) <- forall x (Male(x) and Torturing(x) -> Intact(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Morly is cuplike. Fanchette is silvern. Sharna is silvern. All semite things are not tied. All silvern, stillborn things are tied. If Sharna is stillborn and Sharna is cuplike then Sharna is not silvern. All tomentous things are semite. Nice things are tomentous. All stillborn things are tomentous. If Morly is stillborn then Morly is not silvern. If something is silvern and cuplike then it is stillborn. Fanchette is stillborn.", "logic": "\nCuplike(morly)\nSilvern(fanchette)\nSilvern(sharna)\nforall x (Semite(x) -> not Tied(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) and Stillborn(x) -> Tied(x))\nStillborn(sharna) and Cuplike(sharna) -> not Silvern(sharna)\nforall x (Tomentous(x) -> Semite(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Stillborn(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nStillborn(morly) -> not Silvern(morly)\nforall x (Silvern(x) and Cuplike(x) -> Stillborn(x))\n\nStillborn(fanchette)\n\nforall x (Silvern(x) and Cuplike(x) -> Stillborn(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Prudi is soulless. Sonja is fordable. Cherilyn is fordable. All hellenic things are not seditious. All fordable, easterly things are seditious. If Cherilyn is easterly and Cherilyn is soulless then Cherilyn is not fordable. All uncured things are hellenic. Nice things are uncured. All easterly things are uncured. If Prudi is easterly then Prudi is not fordable. If something is fordable and soulless then it is easterly. Prudi is not seditious.", "logic": "\nSoulless(prudi)\nFordable(sonja)\nFordable(cherilyn)\nforall x (Hellenic(x) -> not Seditious(x))\nforall x (Fordable(x) and Easterly(x) -> Seditious(x))\nEasterly(cherilyn) and Soulless(cherilyn) -> not Fordable(cherilyn)\nforall x (Uncured(x) -> Hellenic(x))\nforall x (Fordable(x) -> Uncured(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) -> Uncured(x))\nEasterly(prudi) -> not Fordable(prudi)\nforall x (Fordable(x) and Soulless(x) -> Easterly(x))\n\nnot Seditious(prudi)\n\nforall x (Fordable(x) and Easterly(x) -> Seditious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Wyndham is stewed. Lon is parochial. Dwain is parochial. All downmarket things are not crinkled. All parochial, schematic things are crinkled. If Dwain is schematic and Dwain is stewed then Dwain is not parochial. All vermiform things are downmarket. Nice things are vermiform. All schematic things are vermiform. If Wyndham is schematic then Wyndham is not parochial. If something is parochial and stewed then it is schematic. Wyndham is downmarket.", "logic": "\nStewed(wyndham)\nParochial(lon)\nParochial(dwain)\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> not Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Parochial(x) and Schematic(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nSchematic(dwain) and Stewed(dwain) -> not Parochial(dwain)\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Downmarket(x))\nforall x (Parochial(x) -> Vermiform(x))\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Vermiform(x))\nSchematic(wyndham) -> not Parochial(wyndham)\nforall x (Parochial(x) and Stewed(x) -> Schematic(x))\n\nDownmarket(wyndham)\n\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Downmarket(x)) <- forall x (Schematic(x) -> Vermiform(x)) <- forall x (Parochial(x) and Stewed(x) -> Schematic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Theodor is barefoot. Linda is german. Laina is german. All pink things are not compounded. All german, parvenue things are compounded. If Laina is parvenue and Laina is barefoot then Laina is not german. All crustacean things are pink. Nice things are crustacean. All parvenue things are crustacean. If Theodor is parvenue then Theodor is not german. If something is german and barefoot then it is parvenue. Linda is not barefoot.", "logic": "\nBarefoot(theodor)\nGerman(linda)\nGerman(laina)\nforall x (Pink(x) -> not Compounded(x))\nforall x (German(x) and Parvenue(x) -> Compounded(x))\nParvenue(laina) and Barefoot(laina) -> not German(laina)\nforall x (Crustacean(x) -> Pink(x))\nforall x (German(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Parvenue(x) -> Crustacean(x))\nParvenue(theodor) -> not German(theodor)\nforall x (German(x) and Barefoot(x) -> Parvenue(x))\n\nnot Barefoot(linda)\n\nnot Barefoot(linda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Karsten is stoppable. Fleming is aggravated. Dorothea is aggravated. All vocational things are not athletic. All aggravated, downlike things are athletic. If Dorothea is downlike and Dorothea is stoppable then Dorothea is not aggravated. All backward things are vocational. Nice things are backward. All downlike things are backward. If Karsten is downlike then Karsten is not aggravated. If something is aggravated and stoppable then it is downlike. Fleming is smart.", "logic": "\nStoppable(karsten)\nAggravated(fleming)\nAggravated(dorothea)\nforall x (Vocational(x) -> not Athletic(x))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) and Downlike(x) -> Athletic(x))\nDownlike(dorothea) and Stoppable(dorothea) -> not Aggravated(dorothea)\nforall x (Backward(x) -> Vocational(x))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Backward(x))\nforall x (Downlike(x) -> Backward(x))\nDownlike(karsten) -> not Aggravated(karsten)\nforall x (Aggravated(x) and Stoppable(x) -> Downlike(x))\n\nSmart(fleming)\n\nSmart(fleming) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Nyssa is older. Bernetta is abkhaz. Charlene is abkhaz. All noisome things are not foremost. All abkhaz, feminine things are foremost. If Charlene is feminine and Charlene is older then Charlene is not abkhaz. All pillaged things are noisome. Nice things are pillaged. All feminine things are pillaged. If Nyssa is feminine then Nyssa is not abkhaz. If something is abkhaz and older then it is feminine. Nyssa is not smart.", "logic": "\nOlder(nyssa)\nAbkhaz(bernetta)\nAbkhaz(charlene)\nforall x (Noisome(x) -> not Foremost(x))\nforall x (Abkhaz(x) and Feminine(x) -> Foremost(x))\nFeminine(charlene) and Older(charlene) -> not Abkhaz(charlene)\nforall x (Pillaged(x) -> Noisome(x))\nforall x (Abkhaz(x) -> Pillaged(x))\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Pillaged(x))\nFeminine(nyssa) -> not Abkhaz(nyssa)\nforall x (Abkhaz(x) and Older(x) -> Feminine(x))\n\nnot Smart(nyssa)\n\nnot Smart(nyssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "Onida is comfy. Amandie is openhanded. Diane is openhanded. All azido things are not maidenly. All openhanded, streaked things are maidenly. If Diane is streaked and Diane is comfy then Diane is not openhanded. All ensiform things are azido. Nice things are ensiform. All streaked things are ensiform. If Onida is streaked then Onida is not openhanded. If something is openhanded and comfy then it is streaked. Diane is comfy.", "logic": "\nComfy(onida)\nOpenhanded(amandie)\nOpenhanded(diane)\nforall x (Azido(x) -> not Maidenly(x))\nforall x (Openhanded(x) and Streaked(x) -> Maidenly(x))\nStreaked(diane) and Comfy(diane) -> not Openhanded(diane)\nforall x (Ensiform(x) -> Azido(x))\nforall x (Openhanded(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nStreaked(onida) -> not Openhanded(onida)\nforall x (Openhanded(x) and Comfy(x) -> Streaked(x))\n\nComfy(diane)\n\nComfy(diane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1632"} {"premises": "The duncan is previous. The duncan alkalinize the werner. The nataline trisect the werner. The nataline is previous. The nataline alkalinize the duncan. The werner alkalinize the duncan. The penrod is statewide. If someone alkalinize the penrod and the penrod guard the werner then they need the duncan. If someone alkalinize the nataline then the nataline is statewide. If the duncan does not visit the werner then the werner is sacerdotal. If someone alkalinize the werner and the werner does not chase the penrod then the werner trisect the duncan. If someone is statewide then they visit the nataline. If someone trisect the werner and they visit the werner then they are sacerdotal. The werner alkalinize the duncan.", "logic": "\nPrevious(duncan)\nAlkalinize(duncan, werner)\nTrisect(nataline, werner)\nPrevious(nataline)\nAlkalinize(nataline, duncan)\nAlkalinize(werner, duncan)\nStatewide(penrod)\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, penrod) and Guard(penrod, werner) -> Guard(x, duncan))\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, nataline) -> Statewide(nataline))\nnot Alkalinize(duncan, werner) -> Sacerdotal(werner)\nforall x (Alkalinize(x, werner) and not Trisect(werner, penrod) -> Trisect(werner, duncan))\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> Alkalinize(x, nataline))\nforall x (Trisect(x, werner) and Alkalinize(x, werner) -> Sacerdotal(x))\n\nAlkalinize(werner, duncan)\n\ntherefore Alkalinize(werner, duncan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The margarete is pragmatic. The margarete cube the catriona. The carmine snuff the catriona. The carmine is pragmatic. The carmine cube the margarete. The catriona cube the margarete. The kittie is doughy. If someone cube the kittie and the kittie floss the catriona then they need the margarete. If someone cube the carmine then the carmine is doughy. If the margarete does not visit the catriona then the catriona is desperate. If someone cube the catriona and the catriona does not chase the kittie then the catriona snuff the margarete. If someone is doughy then they visit the carmine. If someone snuff the catriona and they visit the catriona then they are desperate. The kittie is not doughy.", "logic": "\nPragmatic(margarete)\nCube(margarete, catriona)\nSnuff(carmine, catriona)\nPragmatic(carmine)\nCube(carmine, margarete)\nCube(catriona, margarete)\nDoughy(kittie)\nforall x (Cube(x, kittie) and Floss(kittie, catriona) -> Floss(x, margarete))\nforall x (Cube(x, carmine) -> Doughy(carmine))\nnot Cube(margarete, catriona) -> Desperate(catriona)\nforall x (Cube(x, catriona) and not Snuff(catriona, kittie) -> Snuff(catriona, margarete))\nforall x (Doughy(x) -> Cube(x, carmine))\nforall x (Snuff(x, catriona) and Cube(x, catriona) -> Desperate(x))\n\nnot Doughy(kittie)\n\ntherefore Doughy(kittie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The ephram is outdoor. The ephram multiply the yance. The charis bootleg the yance. The charis is outdoor. The charis multiply the ephram. The yance multiply the ephram. The jeannette is unwrapped. If someone multiply the jeannette and the jeannette opalize the yance then they need the ephram. If someone multiply the charis then the charis is unwrapped. If the ephram does not visit the yance then the yance is thorough. If someone multiply the yance and the yance does not chase the jeannette then the yance bootleg the ephram. If someone is unwrapped then they visit the charis. If someone bootleg the yance and they visit the yance then they are thorough. The jeannette multiply the charis.", "logic": "\nOutdoor(ephram)\nMultiply(ephram, yance)\nBootleg(charis, yance)\nOutdoor(charis)\nMultiply(charis, ephram)\nMultiply(yance, ephram)\nUnwrapped(jeannette)\nforall x (Multiply(x, jeannette) and Opalize(jeannette, yance) -> Opalize(x, ephram))\nforall x (Multiply(x, charis) -> Unwrapped(charis))\nnot Multiply(ephram, yance) -> Thorough(yance)\nforall x (Multiply(x, yance) and not Bootleg(yance, jeannette) -> Bootleg(yance, ephram))\nforall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Multiply(x, charis))\nforall x (Bootleg(x, yance) and Multiply(x, yance) -> Thorough(x))\n\nMultiply(jeannette, charis)\n\nUnwrapped(jeannette) and forall x (Unwrapped(x) -> Multiply(x, charis)) -> therefore Multiply(jeannette, charis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The alpa is unsloped. The alpa climax the pepillo. The raphael contradict the pepillo. The raphael is unsloped. The raphael climax the alpa. The pepillo climax the alpa. The cindra is found. If someone climax the cindra and the cindra bundle the pepillo then they need the alpa. If someone climax the raphael then the raphael is found. If the alpa does not visit the pepillo then the pepillo is iodinating. If someone climax the pepillo and the pepillo does not chase the cindra then the pepillo contradict the alpa. If someone is found then they visit the raphael. If someone contradict the pepillo and they visit the pepillo then they are iodinating. The cindra does not visit the raphael.", "logic": "\nUnsloped(alpa)\nClimax(alpa, pepillo)\nContradict(raphael, pepillo)\nUnsloped(raphael)\nClimax(raphael, alpa)\nClimax(pepillo, alpa)\nFound(cindra)\nforall x (Climax(x, cindra) and Bundle(cindra, pepillo) -> Bundle(x, alpa))\nforall x (Climax(x, raphael) -> Found(raphael))\nnot Climax(alpa, pepillo) -> Iodinating(pepillo)\nforall x (Climax(x, pepillo) and not Contradict(pepillo, cindra) -> Contradict(pepillo, alpa))\nforall x (Found(x) -> Climax(x, raphael))\nforall x (Contradict(x, pepillo) and Climax(x, pepillo) -> Iodinating(x))\n\nnot Climax(cindra, raphael)\n\nFound(cindra) and forall x (Found(x) -> Climax(x, raphael)) -> therefore Climax(cindra, raphael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The ailee is theist. The ailee secularise the ada. The lira traipse the ada. The lira is theist. The lira secularise the ailee. The ada secularise the ailee. The roseanna is inconstant. If someone secularise the roseanna and the roseanna intrigue the ada then they need the ailee. If someone secularise the lira then the lira is inconstant. If the ailee does not visit the ada then the ada is defensive. If someone secularise the ada and the ada does not chase the roseanna then the ada traipse the ailee. If someone is inconstant then they visit the lira. If someone traipse the ada and they visit the ada then they are defensive. The lira is inconstant.", "logic": "\nTheist(ailee)\nSecularise(ailee, ada)\nTraipse(lira, ada)\nTheist(lira)\nSecularise(lira, ailee)\nSecularise(ada, ailee)\nInconstant(roseanna)\nforall x (Secularise(x, roseanna) and Intrigue(roseanna, ada) -> Intrigue(x, ailee))\nforall x (Secularise(x, lira) -> Inconstant(lira))\nnot Secularise(ailee, ada) -> Defensive(ada)\nforall x (Secularise(x, ada) and not Traipse(ada, roseanna) -> Traipse(ada, ailee))\nforall x (Inconstant(x) -> Secularise(x, lira))\nforall x (Traipse(x, ada) and Secularise(x, ada) -> Defensive(x))\n\nInconstant(lira)\n\nInconstant(roseanna) and forall x (Inconstant(x) -> Secularise(x, lira)) -> therefore Secularise(roseanna, lira) Secularise(roseanna, lira) and forall x (Secularise(x, lira) -> Inconstant(lira)) -> therefore Inconstant(lira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The jessamine is pyogenic. The jessamine gleam the mufinella. The lincoln tide the mufinella. The lincoln is pyogenic. The lincoln gleam the jessamine. The mufinella gleam the jessamine. The danyette is apnoeic. If someone gleam the danyette and the danyette board the mufinella then they need the jessamine. If someone gleam the lincoln then the lincoln is apnoeic. If the jessamine does not visit the mufinella then the mufinella is crusty. If someone gleam the mufinella and the mufinella does not chase the danyette then the mufinella tide the jessamine. If someone is apnoeic then they visit the lincoln. If someone tide the mufinella and they visit the mufinella then they are crusty. The lincoln is not apnoeic.", "logic": "\nPyogenic(jessamine)\nGleam(jessamine, mufinella)\nTide(lincoln, mufinella)\nPyogenic(lincoln)\nGleam(lincoln, jessamine)\nGleam(mufinella, jessamine)\nApnoeic(danyette)\nforall x (Gleam(x, danyette) and Board(danyette, mufinella) -> Board(x, jessamine))\nforall x (Gleam(x, lincoln) -> Apnoeic(lincoln))\nnot Gleam(jessamine, mufinella) -> Crusty(mufinella)\nforall x (Gleam(x, mufinella) and not Tide(mufinella, danyette) -> Tide(mufinella, jessamine))\nforall x (Apnoeic(x) -> Gleam(x, lincoln))\nforall x (Tide(x, mufinella) and Gleam(x, mufinella) -> Crusty(x))\n\nnot Apnoeic(lincoln)\n\nApnoeic(danyette) and forall x (Apnoeic(x) -> Gleam(x, lincoln)) -> therefore Gleam(danyette, lincoln) Gleam(danyette, lincoln) and forall x (Gleam(x, lincoln) -> Apnoeic(lincoln)) -> therefore Apnoeic(lincoln)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The corliss is depleted. The corliss unionize the lilias. The fredia dispel the lilias. The fredia is depleted. The fredia unionize the corliss. The lilias unionize the corliss. The jenny is smarmy. If someone unionize the jenny and the jenny tapdance the lilias then they need the corliss. If someone unionize the fredia then the fredia is smarmy. If the corliss does not visit the lilias then the lilias is duncish. If someone unionize the lilias and the lilias does not chase the jenny then the lilias dispel the corliss. If someone is smarmy then they visit the fredia. If someone dispel the lilias and they visit the lilias then they are duncish. The fredia unionize the fredia.", "logic": "\nDepleted(corliss)\nUnionize(corliss, lilias)\nDispel(fredia, lilias)\nDepleted(fredia)\nUnionize(fredia, corliss)\nUnionize(lilias, corliss)\nSmarmy(jenny)\nforall x (Unionize(x, jenny) and Tapdance(jenny, lilias) -> Tapdance(x, corliss))\nforall x (Unionize(x, fredia) -> Smarmy(fredia))\nnot Unionize(corliss, lilias) -> Duncish(lilias)\nforall x (Unionize(x, lilias) and not Dispel(lilias, jenny) -> Dispel(lilias, corliss))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) -> Unionize(x, fredia))\nforall x (Dispel(x, lilias) and Unionize(x, lilias) -> Duncish(x))\n\nUnionize(fredia, fredia)\n\nSmarmy(jenny) and forall x (Smarmy(x) -> Unionize(x, fredia)) -> therefore Unionize(jenny, fredia) Unionize(jenny, fredia) and forall x (Unionize(x, fredia) -> Smarmy(fredia)) -> therefore Smarmy(fredia) Smarmy(fredia) and forall x (Smarmy(x) -> Unionize(x, fredia)) -> therefore Unionize(fredia, fredia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The christin is argentic. The christin humble the burton. The kelsi inebriate the burton. The kelsi is argentic. The kelsi humble the christin. The burton humble the christin. The marcella is sought. If someone humble the marcella and the marcella sponsor the burton then they need the christin. If someone humble the kelsi then the kelsi is sought. If the christin does not visit the burton then the burton is random. If someone humble the burton and the burton does not chase the marcella then the burton inebriate the christin. If someone is sought then they visit the kelsi. If someone inebriate the burton and they visit the burton then they are random. The kelsi does not visit the kelsi.", "logic": "\nArgentic(christin)\nHumble(christin, burton)\nInebriate(kelsi, burton)\nArgentic(kelsi)\nHumble(kelsi, christin)\nHumble(burton, christin)\nSought(marcella)\nforall x (Humble(x, marcella) and Sponsor(marcella, burton) -> Sponsor(x, christin))\nforall x (Humble(x, kelsi) -> Sought(kelsi))\nnot Humble(christin, burton) -> Random(burton)\nforall x (Humble(x, burton) and not Inebriate(burton, marcella) -> Inebriate(burton, christin))\nforall x (Sought(x) -> Humble(x, kelsi))\nforall x (Inebriate(x, burton) and Humble(x, burton) -> Random(x))\n\nnot Humble(kelsi, kelsi)\n\nSought(marcella) and forall x (Sought(x) -> Humble(x, kelsi)) -> therefore Humble(marcella, kelsi) Humble(marcella, kelsi) and forall x (Humble(x, kelsi) -> Sought(kelsi)) -> therefore Sought(kelsi) Sought(kelsi) and forall x (Sought(x) -> Humble(x, kelsi)) -> therefore Humble(kelsi, kelsi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The sampson is cushiony. The sampson animise the berk. The eyde bacterize the berk. The eyde is cushiony. The eyde animise the sampson. The berk animise the sampson. The sherilyn is barelegged. If someone animise the sherilyn and the sherilyn inventory the berk then they need the sampson. If someone animise the eyde then the eyde is barelegged. If the sampson does not visit the berk then the berk is senile. If someone animise the berk and the berk does not chase the sherilyn then the berk bacterize the sampson. If someone is barelegged then they visit the eyde. If someone bacterize the berk and they visit the berk then they are senile. The eyde does not need the sampson.", "logic": "\nCushiony(sampson)\nAnimise(sampson, berk)\nBacterize(eyde, berk)\nCushiony(eyde)\nAnimise(eyde, sampson)\nAnimise(berk, sampson)\nBarelegged(sherilyn)\nforall x (Animise(x, sherilyn) and Inventory(sherilyn, berk) -> Inventory(x, sampson))\nforall x (Animise(x, eyde) -> Barelegged(eyde))\nnot Animise(sampson, berk) -> Senile(berk)\nforall x (Animise(x, berk) and not Bacterize(berk, sherilyn) -> Bacterize(berk, sampson))\nforall x (Barelegged(x) -> Animise(x, eyde))\nforall x (Bacterize(x, berk) and Animise(x, berk) -> Senile(x))\n\nnot Inventory(eyde, sampson)\n\nforall x (Animise(x, sherilyn) and Inventory(sherilyn, berk) -> Inventory(x, sampson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The adams is streaming. The adams modulate the margret. The jolee magnify the margret. The jolee is streaming. The jolee modulate the adams. The margret modulate the adams. The ulla is ascendent. If someone modulate the ulla and the ulla rumor the margret then they need the adams. If someone modulate the jolee then the jolee is ascendent. If the adams does not visit the margret then the margret is heavyset. If someone modulate the margret and the margret does not chase the ulla then the margret magnify the adams. If someone is ascendent then they visit the jolee. If someone magnify the margret and they visit the margret then they are heavyset. The adams is heavyset.", "logic": "\nStreaming(adams)\nModulate(adams, margret)\nMagnify(jolee, margret)\nStreaming(jolee)\nModulate(jolee, adams)\nModulate(margret, adams)\nAscendent(ulla)\nforall x (Modulate(x, ulla) and Rumor(ulla, margret) -> Rumor(x, adams))\nforall x (Modulate(x, jolee) -> Ascendent(jolee))\nnot Modulate(adams, margret) -> Heavyset(margret)\nforall x (Modulate(x, margret) and not Magnify(margret, ulla) -> Magnify(margret, adams))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> Modulate(x, jolee))\nforall x (Magnify(x, margret) and Modulate(x, margret) -> Heavyset(x))\n\nHeavyset(adams)\n\nforall x (Magnify(x, margret) and Modulate(x, margret) -> Heavyset(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The adriaens is soignee. The adriaens load the brandie. The anselm jactitate the brandie. The anselm is soignee. The anselm load the adriaens. The brandie load the adriaens. The lionel is reasonless. If someone load the lionel and the lionel massage the brandie then they need the adriaens. If someone load the anselm then the anselm is reasonless. If the adriaens does not visit the brandie then the brandie is immediate. If someone load the brandie and the brandie does not chase the lionel then the brandie jactitate the adriaens. If someone is reasonless then they visit the anselm. If someone jactitate the brandie and they visit the brandie then they are immediate. The brandie does not visit the anselm.", "logic": "\nSoignee(adriaens)\nLoad(adriaens, brandie)\nJactitate(anselm, brandie)\nSoignee(anselm)\nLoad(anselm, adriaens)\nLoad(brandie, adriaens)\nReasonless(lionel)\nforall x (Load(x, lionel) and Massage(lionel, brandie) -> Massage(x, adriaens))\nforall x (Load(x, anselm) -> Reasonless(anselm))\nnot Load(adriaens, brandie) -> Immediate(brandie)\nforall x (Load(x, brandie) and not Jactitate(brandie, lionel) -> Jactitate(brandie, adriaens))\nforall x (Reasonless(x) -> Load(x, anselm))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, brandie) and Load(x, brandie) -> Immediate(x))\n\nnot Load(brandie, anselm)\n\nforall x (Reasonless(x) -> Load(x, anselm)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The chrysa is unchecked. The chrysa vermilion the connie. The wanda transmit the connie. The wanda is unchecked. The wanda vermilion the chrysa. The connie vermilion the chrysa. The babita is stellate. If someone vermilion the babita and the babita cloister the connie then they need the chrysa. If someone vermilion the wanda then the wanda is stellate. If the chrysa does not visit the connie then the connie is ibsenian. If someone vermilion the connie and the connie does not chase the babita then the connie transmit the chrysa. If someone is stellate then they visit the wanda. If someone transmit the connie and they visit the connie then they are ibsenian. The connie is ibsenian.", "logic": "\nUnchecked(chrysa)\nVermilion(chrysa, connie)\nTransmit(wanda, connie)\nUnchecked(wanda)\nVermilion(wanda, chrysa)\nVermilion(connie, chrysa)\nStellate(babita)\nforall x (Vermilion(x, babita) and Cloister(babita, connie) -> Cloister(x, chrysa))\nforall x (Vermilion(x, wanda) -> Stellate(wanda))\nnot Vermilion(chrysa, connie) -> Ibsenian(connie)\nforall x (Vermilion(x, connie) and not Transmit(connie, babita) -> Transmit(connie, chrysa))\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Vermilion(x, wanda))\nforall x (Transmit(x, connie) and Vermilion(x, connie) -> Ibsenian(x))\n\nIbsenian(connie)\n\nnot Vermilion(chrysa, connie) -> Ibsenian(connie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The elwira is great. The elwira alkalinise the wiley. The boyce upholster the wiley. The boyce is great. The boyce alkalinise the elwira. The wiley alkalinise the elwira. The gaby is rhodesian. If someone alkalinise the gaby and the gaby conglobe the wiley then they need the elwira. If someone alkalinise the boyce then the boyce is rhodesian. If the elwira does not visit the wiley then the wiley is bentonitic. If someone alkalinise the wiley and the wiley does not chase the gaby then the wiley upholster the elwira. If someone is rhodesian then they visit the boyce. If someone upholster the wiley and they visit the wiley then they are bentonitic. The boyce does not need the boyce.", "logic": "\nGreat(elwira)\nAlkalinise(elwira, wiley)\nUpholster(boyce, wiley)\nGreat(boyce)\nAlkalinise(boyce, elwira)\nAlkalinise(wiley, elwira)\nRhodesian(gaby)\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, gaby) and Conglobe(gaby, wiley) -> Conglobe(x, elwira))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, boyce) -> Rhodesian(boyce))\nnot Alkalinise(elwira, wiley) -> Bentonitic(wiley)\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, wiley) and not Upholster(wiley, gaby) -> Upholster(wiley, elwira))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) -> Alkalinise(x, boyce))\nforall x (Upholster(x, wiley) and Alkalinise(x, wiley) -> Bentonitic(x))\n\nnot Conglobe(boyce, boyce)\n\nnot Conglobe(boyce, boyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The terencio is miffed. The terencio console the jennine. The cosette decease the jennine. The cosette is miffed. The cosette console the terencio. The jennine console the terencio. The petey is unwilling. If someone console the petey and the petey abandon the jennine then they need the terencio. If someone console the cosette then the cosette is unwilling. If the terencio does not visit the jennine then the jennine is staunch. If someone console the jennine and the jennine does not chase the petey then the jennine decease the terencio. If someone is unwilling then they visit the cosette. If someone decease the jennine and they visit the jennine then they are staunch. The cosette abandon the petey.", "logic": "\nMiffed(terencio)\nConsole(terencio, jennine)\nDecease(cosette, jennine)\nMiffed(cosette)\nConsole(cosette, terencio)\nConsole(jennine, terencio)\nUnwilling(petey)\nforall x (Console(x, petey) and Abandon(petey, jennine) -> Abandon(x, terencio))\nforall x (Console(x, cosette) -> Unwilling(cosette))\nnot Console(terencio, jennine) -> Staunch(jennine)\nforall x (Console(x, jennine) and not Decease(jennine, petey) -> Decease(jennine, terencio))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) -> Console(x, cosette))\nforall x (Decease(x, jennine) and Console(x, jennine) -> Staunch(x))\n\nAbandon(cosette, petey)\n\nAbandon(cosette, petey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The rosalind is biracial. The rosalind mime the bronson. The cookie plagiarize the bronson. The cookie is biracial. The cookie mime the rosalind. The bronson mime the rosalind. The graeme is nauseous. If someone mime the graeme and the graeme plot the bronson then they need the rosalind. If someone mime the cookie then the cookie is nauseous. If the rosalind does not visit the bronson then the bronson is abounding. If someone mime the bronson and the bronson does not chase the graeme then the bronson plagiarize the rosalind. If someone is nauseous then they visit the cookie. If someone plagiarize the bronson and they visit the bronson then they are abounding. The cookie does not chase the rosalind.", "logic": "\nBiracial(rosalind)\nMime(rosalind, bronson)\nPlagiarize(cookie, bronson)\nBiracial(cookie)\nMime(cookie, rosalind)\nMime(bronson, rosalind)\nNauseous(graeme)\nforall x (Mime(x, graeme) and Plot(graeme, bronson) -> Plot(x, rosalind))\nforall x (Mime(x, cookie) -> Nauseous(cookie))\nnot Mime(rosalind, bronson) -> Abounding(bronson)\nforall x (Mime(x, bronson) and not Plagiarize(bronson, graeme) -> Plagiarize(bronson, rosalind))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Mime(x, cookie))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, bronson) and Mime(x, bronson) -> Abounding(x))\n\nnot Plagiarize(cookie, rosalind)\n\nnot Plagiarize(cookie, rosalind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The lucila is cancerous. The lucila transcend the alaa. The bradley inhale the alaa. The bradley is cancerous. The bradley transcend the lucila. The alaa transcend the lucila. The tray is placid. If someone transcend the tray and the tray moulder the alaa then they need the lucila. If someone transcend the bradley then the bradley is placid. If the lucila does not visit the alaa then the alaa is immanent. If someone transcend the alaa and the alaa does not chase the tray then the alaa inhale the lucila. If someone is placid then they visit the bradley. If someone inhale the alaa and they visit the alaa then they are immanent. The bradley transcend the tray.", "logic": "\nCancerous(lucila)\nTranscend(lucila, alaa)\nInhale(bradley, alaa)\nCancerous(bradley)\nTranscend(bradley, lucila)\nTranscend(alaa, lucila)\nPlacid(tray)\nforall x (Transcend(x, tray) and Moulder(tray, alaa) -> Moulder(x, lucila))\nforall x (Transcend(x, bradley) -> Placid(bradley))\nnot Transcend(lucila, alaa) -> Immanent(alaa)\nforall x (Transcend(x, alaa) and not Inhale(alaa, tray) -> Inhale(alaa, lucila))\nforall x (Placid(x) -> Transcend(x, bradley))\nforall x (Inhale(x, alaa) and Transcend(x, alaa) -> Immanent(x))\n\nTranscend(bradley, tray)\n\nTranscend(bradley, tray) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-224"} {"premises": "The duke is ossiferous. The rheta expire the hinda. The rheta is arced. The rheta debouch the duke. The anson is arced. The anson is not appendaged. The hinda is appendaged. If someone spoil the duke and they are not tongueless then the duke expire the rheta. If someone expire the anson then they do not see the rheta. If someone expire the duke and they need the rheta then the duke is arced. If someone is ossiferous then they need the anson. If someone expire the duke and they need the rheta then the rheta expire the duke. If someone spoil the anson then the anson is ossiferous. If someone spoil the rheta and they do not see the duke then they are grapelike. If someone expire the duke then they need the rheta. The hinda is appendaged.", "logic": "\nOssiferous(duke)\nExpire(rheta, hinda)\nArced(rheta)\nDebouch(rheta, duke)\nArced(anson)\nnot Appendaged(anson)\nAppendaged(hinda)\nforall x (Spoil(x, duke) and not Tongueless(x) -> Expire(duke, rheta))\nforall x (Expire(x, anson) -> not Debouch(x, rheta))\nforall x (Expire(x, duke) and Spoil(x, rheta) -> Arced(duke))\nforall x (Ossiferous(x) -> Spoil(x, anson))\nforall x (Expire(x, duke) and Spoil(x, rheta) -> Expire(rheta, duke))\nforall x (Spoil(x, anson) -> Ossiferous(anson))\nforall x (Spoil(x, rheta) and not Debouch(x, duke) -> Grapelike(x))\nforall x (Expire(x, duke) -> Spoil(x, rheta))\n\nAppendaged(hinda)\n\ntherefore Appendaged(hinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The simmonds is fortunate. The diena scroll the bancroft. The diena is alsatian. The diena card the simmonds. The fredrika is alsatian. The fredrika is not taut. The bancroft is taut. If someone starve the simmonds and they are not domestic then the simmonds scroll the diena. If someone scroll the fredrika then they do not see the diena. If someone scroll the simmonds and they need the diena then the simmonds is alsatian. If someone is fortunate then they need the fredrika. If someone scroll the simmonds and they need the diena then the diena scroll the simmonds. If someone starve the fredrika then the fredrika is fortunate. If someone starve the diena and they do not see the simmonds then they are demented. If someone scroll the simmonds then they need the diena. The diena does not chase the bancroft.", "logic": "\nFortunate(simmonds)\nScroll(diena, bancroft)\nAlsatian(diena)\nCard(diena, simmonds)\nAlsatian(fredrika)\nnot Taut(fredrika)\nTaut(bancroft)\nforall x (Starve(x, simmonds) and not Domestic(x) -> Scroll(simmonds, diena))\nforall x (Scroll(x, fredrika) -> not Card(x, diena))\nforall x (Scroll(x, simmonds) and Starve(x, diena) -> Alsatian(simmonds))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Starve(x, fredrika))\nforall x (Scroll(x, simmonds) and Starve(x, diena) -> Scroll(diena, simmonds))\nforall x (Starve(x, fredrika) -> Fortunate(fredrika))\nforall x (Starve(x, diena) and not Card(x, simmonds) -> Demented(x))\nforall x (Scroll(x, simmonds) -> Starve(x, diena))\n\nnot Scroll(diena, bancroft)\n\ntherefore Scroll(diena, bancroft)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The brigitta is microsomal. The kylynn emplace the janine. The kylynn is idealistic. The kylynn summate the brigitta. The denise is idealistic. The denise is not heavenward. The janine is heavenward. If someone stimulate the brigitta and they are not muhammadan then the brigitta emplace the kylynn. If someone emplace the denise then they do not see the kylynn. If someone emplace the brigitta and they need the kylynn then the brigitta is idealistic. If someone is microsomal then they need the denise. If someone emplace the brigitta and they need the kylynn then the kylynn emplace the brigitta. If someone stimulate the denise then the denise is microsomal. If someone stimulate the kylynn and they do not see the brigitta then they are mixable. If someone emplace the brigitta then they need the kylynn. The brigitta stimulate the denise.", "logic": "\nMicrosomal(brigitta)\nEmplace(kylynn, janine)\nIdealistic(kylynn)\nSummate(kylynn, brigitta)\nIdealistic(denise)\nnot Heavenward(denise)\nHeavenward(janine)\nforall x (Stimulate(x, brigitta) and not Muhammadan(x) -> Emplace(brigitta, kylynn))\nforall x (Emplace(x, denise) -> not Summate(x, kylynn))\nforall x (Emplace(x, brigitta) and Stimulate(x, kylynn) -> Idealistic(brigitta))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Stimulate(x, denise))\nforall x (Emplace(x, brigitta) and Stimulate(x, kylynn) -> Emplace(kylynn, brigitta))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, denise) -> Microsomal(denise))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, kylynn) and not Summate(x, brigitta) -> Mixable(x))\nforall x (Emplace(x, brigitta) -> Stimulate(x, kylynn))\n\nStimulate(brigitta, denise)\n\nMicrosomal(brigitta) and forall x (Microsomal(x) -> Stimulate(x, denise)) -> therefore Stimulate(brigitta, denise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The clint is illiberal. The miquela interlock the witty. The miquela is nonnative. The miquela companion the clint. The sybyl is nonnative. The sybyl is not reckless. The witty is reckless. If someone chevvy the clint and they are not netted then the clint interlock the miquela. If someone interlock the sybyl then they do not see the miquela. If someone interlock the clint and they need the miquela then the clint is nonnative. If someone is illiberal then they need the sybyl. If someone interlock the clint and they need the miquela then the miquela interlock the clint. If someone chevvy the sybyl then the sybyl is illiberal. If someone chevvy the miquela and they do not see the clint then they are torn. If someone interlock the clint then they need the miquela. The clint does not need the sybyl.", "logic": "\nIlliberal(clint)\nInterlock(miquela, witty)\nNonnative(miquela)\nCompanion(miquela, clint)\nNonnative(sybyl)\nnot Reckless(sybyl)\nReckless(witty)\nforall x (Chevvy(x, clint) and not Netted(x) -> Interlock(clint, miquela))\nforall x (Interlock(x, sybyl) -> not Companion(x, miquela))\nforall x (Interlock(x, clint) and Chevvy(x, miquela) -> Nonnative(clint))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) -> Chevvy(x, sybyl))\nforall x (Interlock(x, clint) and Chevvy(x, miquela) -> Interlock(miquela, clint))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, sybyl) -> Illiberal(sybyl))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, miquela) and not Companion(x, clint) -> Torn(x))\nforall x (Interlock(x, clint) -> Chevvy(x, miquela))\n\nnot Chevvy(clint, sybyl)\n\nIlliberal(clint) and forall x (Illiberal(x) -> Chevvy(x, sybyl)) -> therefore Chevvy(clint, sybyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The odele is rubber. The johan hibachi the charisse. The johan is erasable. The johan cripple the odele. The cathrin is erasable. The cathrin is not incorrupt. The charisse is incorrupt. If someone grout the odele and they are not gold then the odele hibachi the johan. If someone hibachi the cathrin then they do not see the johan. If someone hibachi the odele and they need the johan then the odele is erasable. If someone is rubber then they need the cathrin. If someone hibachi the odele and they need the johan then the johan hibachi the odele. If someone grout the cathrin then the cathrin is rubber. If someone grout the johan and they do not see the odele then they are bedless. If someone hibachi the odele then they need the johan. The cathrin is rubber.", "logic": "\nRubber(odele)\nHibachi(johan, charisse)\nErasable(johan)\nCripple(johan, odele)\nErasable(cathrin)\nnot Incorrupt(cathrin)\nIncorrupt(charisse)\nforall x (Grout(x, odele) and not Gold(x) -> Hibachi(odele, johan))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, cathrin) -> not Cripple(x, johan))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, odele) and Grout(x, johan) -> Erasable(odele))\nforall x (Rubber(x) -> Grout(x, cathrin))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, odele) and Grout(x, johan) -> Hibachi(johan, odele))\nforall x (Grout(x, cathrin) -> Rubber(cathrin))\nforall x (Grout(x, johan) and not Cripple(x, odele) -> Bedless(x))\nforall x (Hibachi(x, odele) -> Grout(x, johan))\n\nRubber(cathrin)\n\nRubber(odele) and forall x (Rubber(x) -> Grout(x, cathrin)) -> therefore Grout(odele, cathrin) Grout(odele, cathrin) and forall x (Grout(x, cathrin) -> Rubber(cathrin)) -> therefore Rubber(cathrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The jayne is variform. The hannis sanctify the jeffrey. The hannis is reported. The hannis caption the jayne. The temple is reported. The temple is not uvular. The jeffrey is uvular. If someone break the jayne and they are not unpermed then the jayne sanctify the hannis. If someone sanctify the temple then they do not see the hannis. If someone sanctify the jayne and they need the hannis then the jayne is reported. If someone is variform then they need the temple. If someone sanctify the jayne and they need the hannis then the hannis sanctify the jayne. If someone break the temple then the temple is variform. If someone break the hannis and they do not see the jayne then they are rationed. If someone sanctify the jayne then they need the hannis. The temple is not variform.", "logic": "\nVariform(jayne)\nSanctify(hannis, jeffrey)\nReported(hannis)\nCaption(hannis, jayne)\nReported(temple)\nnot Uvular(temple)\nUvular(jeffrey)\nforall x (Break(x, jayne) and not Unpermed(x) -> Sanctify(jayne, hannis))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, temple) -> not Caption(x, hannis))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, jayne) and Break(x, hannis) -> Reported(jayne))\nforall x (Variform(x) -> Break(x, temple))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, jayne) and Break(x, hannis) -> Sanctify(hannis, jayne))\nforall x (Break(x, temple) -> Variform(temple))\nforall x (Break(x, hannis) and not Caption(x, jayne) -> Rationed(x))\nforall x (Sanctify(x, jayne) -> Break(x, hannis))\n\nnot Variform(temple)\n\nVariform(jayne) and forall x (Variform(x) -> Break(x, temple)) -> therefore Break(jayne, temple) Break(jayne, temple) and forall x (Break(x, temple) -> Variform(temple)) -> therefore Variform(temple)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The rissa is aneuploid. The glynnis anodize the marsh. The glynnis is plastered. The glynnis winnow the rissa. The darice is plastered. The darice is not fragile. The marsh is fragile. If someone transport the rissa and they are not cumulous then the rissa anodize the glynnis. If someone anodize the darice then they do not see the glynnis. If someone anodize the rissa and they need the glynnis then the rissa is plastered. If someone is aneuploid then they need the darice. If someone anodize the rissa and they need the glynnis then the glynnis anodize the rissa. If someone transport the darice then the darice is aneuploid. If someone transport the glynnis and they do not see the rissa then they are unclogged. If someone anodize the rissa then they need the glynnis. The darice transport the darice.", "logic": "\nAneuploid(rissa)\nAnodize(glynnis, marsh)\nPlastered(glynnis)\nWinnow(glynnis, rissa)\nPlastered(darice)\nnot Fragile(darice)\nFragile(marsh)\nforall x (Transport(x, rissa) and not Cumulous(x) -> Anodize(rissa, glynnis))\nforall x (Anodize(x, darice) -> not Winnow(x, glynnis))\nforall x (Anodize(x, rissa) and Transport(x, glynnis) -> Plastered(rissa))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Transport(x, darice))\nforall x (Anodize(x, rissa) and Transport(x, glynnis) -> Anodize(glynnis, rissa))\nforall x (Transport(x, darice) -> Aneuploid(darice))\nforall x (Transport(x, glynnis) and not Winnow(x, rissa) -> Unclogged(x))\nforall x (Anodize(x, rissa) -> Transport(x, glynnis))\n\nTransport(darice, darice)\n\nAneuploid(rissa) and forall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Transport(x, darice)) -> therefore Transport(rissa, darice) Transport(rissa, darice) and forall x (Transport(x, darice) -> Aneuploid(darice)) -> therefore Aneuploid(darice) Aneuploid(darice) and forall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Transport(x, darice)) -> therefore Transport(darice, darice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The gustavus is subfusc. The enid debunk the bailey. The enid is assentient. The enid crepe the gustavus. The ramona is assentient. The ramona is not sudsy. The bailey is sudsy. If someone anathemize the gustavus and they are not eared then the gustavus debunk the enid. If someone debunk the ramona then they do not see the enid. If someone debunk the gustavus and they need the enid then the gustavus is assentient. If someone is subfusc then they need the ramona. If someone debunk the gustavus and they need the enid then the enid debunk the gustavus. If someone anathemize the ramona then the ramona is subfusc. If someone anathemize the enid and they do not see the gustavus then they are chilean. If someone debunk the gustavus then they need the enid. The ramona does not need the ramona.", "logic": "\nSubfusc(gustavus)\nDebunk(enid, bailey)\nAssentient(enid)\nCrepe(enid, gustavus)\nAssentient(ramona)\nnot Sudsy(ramona)\nSudsy(bailey)\nforall x (Anathemize(x, gustavus) and not Eared(x) -> Debunk(gustavus, enid))\nforall x (Debunk(x, ramona) -> not Crepe(x, enid))\nforall x (Debunk(x, gustavus) and Anathemize(x, enid) -> Assentient(gustavus))\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Anathemize(x, ramona))\nforall x (Debunk(x, gustavus) and Anathemize(x, enid) -> Debunk(enid, gustavus))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, ramona) -> Subfusc(ramona))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, enid) and not Crepe(x, gustavus) -> Chilean(x))\nforall x (Debunk(x, gustavus) -> Anathemize(x, enid))\n\nnot Anathemize(ramona, ramona)\n\nSubfusc(gustavus) and forall x (Subfusc(x) -> Anathemize(x, ramona)) -> therefore Anathemize(gustavus, ramona) Anathemize(gustavus, ramona) and forall x (Anathemize(x, ramona) -> Subfusc(ramona)) -> therefore Subfusc(ramona) Subfusc(ramona) and forall x (Subfusc(x) -> Anathemize(x, ramona)) -> therefore Anathemize(ramona, ramona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The millie is tacit. The lacey instance the sile. The lacey is chivalrous. The lacey restate the millie. The ahmed is chivalrous. The ahmed is not true. The sile is true. If someone nasale the millie and they are not unhuman then the millie instance the lacey. If someone instance the ahmed then they do not see the lacey. If someone instance the millie and they need the lacey then the millie is chivalrous. If someone is tacit then they need the ahmed. If someone instance the millie and they need the lacey then the lacey instance the millie. If someone nasale the ahmed then the ahmed is tacit. If someone nasale the lacey and they do not see the millie then they are pedestrian. If someone instance the millie then they need the lacey. The ahmed is not pedestrian.", "logic": "\nTacit(millie)\nInstance(lacey, sile)\nChivalrous(lacey)\nRestate(lacey, millie)\nChivalrous(ahmed)\nnot True(ahmed)\nTrue(sile)\nforall x (Nasale(x, millie) and not Unhuman(x) -> Instance(millie, lacey))\nforall x (Instance(x, ahmed) -> not Restate(x, lacey))\nforall x (Instance(x, millie) and Nasale(x, lacey) -> Chivalrous(millie))\nforall x (Tacit(x) -> Nasale(x, ahmed))\nforall x (Instance(x, millie) and Nasale(x, lacey) -> Instance(lacey, millie))\nforall x (Nasale(x, ahmed) -> Tacit(ahmed))\nforall x (Nasale(x, lacey) and not Restate(x, millie) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Instance(x, millie) -> Nasale(x, lacey))\n\nnot Pedestrian(ahmed)\n\nforall x (Nasale(x, lacey) and not Restate(x, millie) -> Pedestrian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The karie is prosodic. The collie bechance the eula. The collie is sassy. The collie bless the karie. The barnett is sassy. The barnett is not unadapted. The eula is unadapted. If someone barricade the karie and they are not draggled then the karie bechance the collie. If someone bechance the barnett then they do not see the collie. If someone bechance the karie and they need the collie then the karie is sassy. If someone is prosodic then they need the barnett. If someone bechance the karie and they need the collie then the collie bechance the karie. If someone barricade the barnett then the barnett is prosodic. If someone barricade the collie and they do not see the karie then they are frankish. If someone bechance the karie then they need the collie. The collie barricade the collie.", "logic": "\nProsodic(karie)\nBechance(collie, eula)\nSassy(collie)\nBless(collie, karie)\nSassy(barnett)\nnot Unadapted(barnett)\nUnadapted(eula)\nforall x (Barricade(x, karie) and not Draggled(x) -> Bechance(karie, collie))\nforall x (Bechance(x, barnett) -> not Bless(x, collie))\nforall x (Bechance(x, karie) and Barricade(x, collie) -> Sassy(karie))\nforall x (Prosodic(x) -> Barricade(x, barnett))\nforall x (Bechance(x, karie) and Barricade(x, collie) -> Bechance(collie, karie))\nforall x (Barricade(x, barnett) -> Prosodic(barnett))\nforall x (Barricade(x, collie) and not Bless(x, karie) -> Frankish(x))\nforall x (Bechance(x, karie) -> Barricade(x, collie))\n\nBarricade(collie, collie)\n\nforall x (Bechance(x, karie) -> Barricade(x, collie)) <- forall x (Bechance(x, karie) and Barricade(x, collie) -> Bechance(collie, karie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The adriana is reproving. The flemming shout the delcina. The flemming is italian. The flemming accoutre the adriana. The avram is italian. The avram is not squalling. The delcina is squalling. If someone defect the adriana and they are not lanky then the adriana shout the flemming. If someone shout the avram then they do not see the flemming. If someone shout the adriana and they need the flemming then the adriana is italian. If someone is reproving then they need the avram. If someone shout the adriana and they need the flemming then the flemming shout the adriana. If someone defect the avram then the avram is reproving. If someone defect the flemming and they do not see the adriana then they are protestant. If someone shout the adriana then they need the flemming. The avram does not need the flemming.", "logic": "\nReproving(adriana)\nShout(flemming, delcina)\nItalian(flemming)\nAccoutre(flemming, adriana)\nItalian(avram)\nnot Squalling(avram)\nSqualling(delcina)\nforall x (Defect(x, adriana) and not Lanky(x) -> Shout(adriana, flemming))\nforall x (Shout(x, avram) -> not Accoutre(x, flemming))\nforall x (Shout(x, adriana) and Defect(x, flemming) -> Italian(adriana))\nforall x (Reproving(x) -> Defect(x, avram))\nforall x (Shout(x, adriana) and Defect(x, flemming) -> Shout(flemming, adriana))\nforall x (Defect(x, avram) -> Reproving(avram))\nforall x (Defect(x, flemming) and not Accoutre(x, adriana) -> Protestant(x))\nforall x (Shout(x, adriana) -> Defect(x, flemming))\n\nnot Defect(avram, flemming)\n\nforall x (Shout(x, adriana) -> Defect(x, flemming)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The vonny is bountied. The winna ensile the zebedee. The winna is zonary. The winna dilute the vonny. The ailina is zonary. The ailina is not mohammedan. The zebedee is mohammedan. If someone recoup the vonny and they are not mendicant then the vonny ensile the winna. If someone ensile the ailina then they do not see the winna. If someone ensile the vonny and they need the winna then the vonny is zonary. If someone is bountied then they need the ailina. If someone ensile the vonny and they need the winna then the winna ensile the vonny. If someone recoup the ailina then the ailina is bountied. If someone recoup the winna and they do not see the vonny then they are mortified. If someone ensile the vonny then they need the winna. The zebedee is mortified.", "logic": "\nBountied(vonny)\nEnsile(winna, zebedee)\nZonary(winna)\nDilute(winna, vonny)\nZonary(ailina)\nnot Mohammedan(ailina)\nMohammedan(zebedee)\nforall x (Recoup(x, vonny) and not Mendicant(x) -> Ensile(vonny, winna))\nforall x (Ensile(x, ailina) -> not Dilute(x, winna))\nforall x (Ensile(x, vonny) and Recoup(x, winna) -> Zonary(vonny))\nforall x (Bountied(x) -> Recoup(x, ailina))\nforall x (Ensile(x, vonny) and Recoup(x, winna) -> Ensile(winna, vonny))\nforall x (Recoup(x, ailina) -> Bountied(ailina))\nforall x (Recoup(x, winna) and not Dilute(x, vonny) -> Mortified(x))\nforall x (Ensile(x, vonny) -> Recoup(x, winna))\n\nMortified(zebedee)\n\nforall x (Recoup(x, winna) and not Dilute(x, vonny) -> Mortified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The becky is bohemian. The kimbra unsnarl the leoline. The kimbra is robed. The kimbra dictate the becky. The moria is robed. The moria is not apsidal. The leoline is apsidal. If someone level the becky and they are not useless then the becky unsnarl the kimbra. If someone unsnarl the moria then they do not see the kimbra. If someone unsnarl the becky and they need the kimbra then the becky is robed. If someone is bohemian then they need the moria. If someone unsnarl the becky and they need the kimbra then the kimbra unsnarl the becky. If someone level the moria then the moria is bohemian. If someone level the kimbra and they do not see the becky then they are skinnerian. If someone unsnarl the becky then they need the kimbra. The becky is not useless.", "logic": "\nBohemian(becky)\nUnsnarl(kimbra, leoline)\nRobed(kimbra)\nDictate(kimbra, becky)\nRobed(moria)\nnot Apsidal(moria)\nApsidal(leoline)\nforall x (Level(x, becky) and not Useless(x) -> Unsnarl(becky, kimbra))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, moria) -> not Dictate(x, kimbra))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, becky) and Level(x, kimbra) -> Robed(becky))\nforall x (Bohemian(x) -> Level(x, moria))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, becky) and Level(x, kimbra) -> Unsnarl(kimbra, becky))\nforall x (Level(x, moria) -> Bohemian(moria))\nforall x (Level(x, kimbra) and not Dictate(x, becky) -> Skinnerian(x))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, becky) -> Level(x, kimbra))\n\nnot Useless(becky)\n\nnot Useless(becky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The belvia is retired. The arleyne multiply the corene. The arleyne is blockading. The arleyne brocade the belvia. The kelci is blockading. The kelci is not russet. The corene is russet. If someone vesiculate the belvia and they are not untimely then the belvia multiply the arleyne. If someone multiply the kelci then they do not see the arleyne. If someone multiply the belvia and they need the arleyne then the belvia is blockading. If someone is retired then they need the kelci. If someone multiply the belvia and they need the arleyne then the arleyne multiply the belvia. If someone vesiculate the kelci then the kelci is retired. If someone vesiculate the arleyne and they do not see the belvia then they are ignitable. If someone multiply the belvia then they need the arleyne. The corene brocade the corene.", "logic": "\nRetired(belvia)\nMultiply(arleyne, corene)\nBlockading(arleyne)\nBrocade(arleyne, belvia)\nBlockading(kelci)\nnot Russet(kelci)\nRusset(corene)\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, belvia) and not Untimely(x) -> Multiply(belvia, arleyne))\nforall x (Multiply(x, kelci) -> not Brocade(x, arleyne))\nforall x (Multiply(x, belvia) and Vesiculate(x, arleyne) -> Blockading(belvia))\nforall x (Retired(x) -> Vesiculate(x, kelci))\nforall x (Multiply(x, belvia) and Vesiculate(x, arleyne) -> Multiply(arleyne, belvia))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, kelci) -> Retired(kelci))\nforall x (Vesiculate(x, arleyne) and not Brocade(x, belvia) -> Ignitable(x))\nforall x (Multiply(x, belvia) -> Vesiculate(x, arleyne))\n\nBrocade(corene, corene)\n\nBrocade(corene, corene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The brandie is color. The jacintha purpurate the maxwell. The jacintha is abridged. The jacintha crust the brandie. The daphene is abridged. The daphene is not uncoupled. The maxwell is uncoupled. If someone sack the brandie and they are not vacuolated then the brandie purpurate the jacintha. If someone purpurate the daphene then they do not see the jacintha. If someone purpurate the brandie and they need the jacintha then the brandie is abridged. If someone is color then they need the daphene. If someone purpurate the brandie and they need the jacintha then the jacintha purpurate the brandie. If someone sack the daphene then the daphene is color. If someone sack the jacintha and they do not see the brandie then they are urinary. If someone purpurate the brandie then they need the jacintha. The maxwell does not see the brandie.", "logic": "\nColor(brandie)\nPurpurate(jacintha, maxwell)\nAbridged(jacintha)\nCrust(jacintha, brandie)\nAbridged(daphene)\nnot Uncoupled(daphene)\nUncoupled(maxwell)\nforall x (Sack(x, brandie) and not Vacuolated(x) -> Purpurate(brandie, jacintha))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, daphene) -> not Crust(x, jacintha))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, brandie) and Sack(x, jacintha) -> Abridged(brandie))\nforall x (Color(x) -> Sack(x, daphene))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, brandie) and Sack(x, jacintha) -> Purpurate(jacintha, brandie))\nforall x (Sack(x, daphene) -> Color(daphene))\nforall x (Sack(x, jacintha) and not Crust(x, brandie) -> Urinary(x))\nforall x (Purpurate(x, brandie) -> Sack(x, jacintha))\n\nnot Crust(maxwell, brandie)\n\nnot Crust(maxwell, brandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "The aubrie is adjuvant. The beverie succor the amelina. The beverie is humourous. The beverie wrong the aubrie. The kati is humourous. The kati is not humped. The amelina is humped. If someone halloo the aubrie and they are not duodecimal then the aubrie succor the beverie. If someone succor the kati then they do not see the beverie. If someone succor the aubrie and they need the beverie then the aubrie is humourous. If someone is adjuvant then they need the kati. If someone succor the aubrie and they need the beverie then the beverie succor the aubrie. If someone halloo the kati then the kati is adjuvant. If someone halloo the beverie and they do not see the aubrie then they are gutsy. If someone succor the aubrie then they need the beverie. The kati succor the amelina.", "logic": "\nAdjuvant(aubrie)\nSuccor(beverie, amelina)\nHumourous(beverie)\nWrong(beverie, aubrie)\nHumourous(kati)\nnot Humped(kati)\nHumped(amelina)\nforall x (Halloo(x, aubrie) and not Duodecimal(x) -> Succor(aubrie, beverie))\nforall x (Succor(x, kati) -> not Wrong(x, beverie))\nforall x (Succor(x, aubrie) and Halloo(x, beverie) -> Humourous(aubrie))\nforall x (Adjuvant(x) -> Halloo(x, kati))\nforall x (Succor(x, aubrie) and Halloo(x, beverie) -> Succor(beverie, aubrie))\nforall x (Halloo(x, kati) -> Adjuvant(kati))\nforall x (Halloo(x, beverie) and not Wrong(x, aubrie) -> Gutsy(x))\nforall x (Succor(x, aubrie) -> Halloo(x, beverie))\n\nSuccor(kati, amelina)\n\nSuccor(kati, amelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-799"} {"premises": "Nonie is cultural. Nonie is mephitic. Nonie is regulated. Nonie is saporous. Nonie is not westside. Nonie is unplumbed. Nonie is unframed. All cultural, saporous people are mephitic. If someone is cultural and not saporous then they are mephitic. If someone is unframed and not saporous then they are mephitic. Quiet people are mephitic. Kind people are mephitic. If someone is regulated and not cultural then they are not mephitic. If someone is mephitic and not westside then they are unframed. Round, saporous people are regulated. Nonie is unframed.", "logic": "\nCultural(nonie)\nMephitic(nonie)\nRegulated(nonie)\nSaporous(nonie)\nnot Westside(nonie)\nUnplumbed(nonie)\nUnframed(nonie)\nforall x (Cultural(x) and Saporous(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Cultural(x) and not Saporous(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Unframed(x) and not Saporous(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Westside(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Saporous(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Regulated(x) and not Cultural(x) -> not Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Mephitic(x) and not Westside(x) -> Unframed(x))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) and Saporous(x) -> Regulated(x))\n\nUnframed(nonie)\n\ntherefore Unframed(nonie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2684"} {"premises": "Sanderson is onymous. Sanderson is focussed. Sanderson is flawless. Sanderson is twofold. Sanderson is not hermetic. Sanderson is apractic. Sanderson is exquisite. All onymous, twofold people are focussed. If someone is onymous and not twofold then they are focussed. If someone is exquisite and not twofold then they are focussed. Quiet people are focussed. Kind people are focussed. If someone is flawless and not onymous then they are not focussed. If someone is focussed and not hermetic then they are exquisite. Round, twofold people are flawless. Sanderson is hermetic.", "logic": "\nOnymous(sanderson)\nFocussed(sanderson)\nFlawless(sanderson)\nTwofold(sanderson)\nnot Hermetic(sanderson)\nApractic(sanderson)\nExquisite(sanderson)\nforall x (Onymous(x) and Twofold(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Onymous(x) and not Twofold(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Exquisite(x) and not Twofold(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Twofold(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Flawless(x) and not Onymous(x) -> not Focussed(x))\nforall x (Focussed(x) and not Hermetic(x) -> Exquisite(x))\nforall x (Apractic(x) and Twofold(x) -> Flawless(x))\n\nHermetic(sanderson)\n\ntherefore not Hermetic(sanderson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2684"} {"premises": "The harlene does not eat the tallia. The harlene does not eat the riva. The harlene is immaculate. The harlene is alexic. The harlene is irregular. The harlene hash the tallia. The harlene hash the riva. The thalia centre the harlene. The thalia fund the tallia. The thalia does not visit the harlene. The thalia hash the riva. The tallia hash the harlene. The riva does not eat the tallia. The riva is employed. The riva fund the thalia. The riva hash the tallia. If something hash the thalia and the thalia hash the tallia then the tallia centre the riva. If the thalia centre the tallia then the thalia does not like the tallia. If something hash the tallia then it hash the riva. If the harlene centre the thalia and the thalia hash the riva then the riva is unleaded. If something is unleaded then it is immaculate. If something hash the harlene then the harlene centre the thalia. If something is alexic and it fund the tallia then it centre the riva. If something centre the harlene and it does not visit the riva then the riva fund the tallia. The riva fund the thalia.", "logic": "\nnot Centre(harlene, tallia)\nnot Centre(harlene, riva)\nImmaculate(harlene)\nAlexic(harlene)\nIrregular(harlene)\nHash(harlene, tallia)\nHash(harlene, riva)\nCentre(thalia, harlene)\nFund(thalia, tallia)\nnot Hash(thalia, harlene)\nHash(thalia, riva)\nHash(tallia, harlene)\nnot Centre(riva, tallia)\nEmployed(riva)\nFund(riva, thalia)\nHash(riva, tallia)\nforall x (Hash(x, thalia) and Hash(thalia, tallia) -> Centre(tallia, riva))\nCentre(thalia, tallia) -> not Fund(thalia, tallia)\nforall x (Hash(x, tallia) -> Hash(x, riva))\nCentre(harlene, thalia) and Hash(thalia, riva) -> Unleaded(riva)\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Immaculate(x))\nforall x (Hash(x, harlene) -> Centre(harlene, thalia))\nforall x (Alexic(x) and Fund(x, tallia) -> Centre(x, riva))\nforall x (Centre(x, harlene) and not Hash(x, riva) -> Fund(riva, tallia))\n\nFund(riva, thalia)\n\ntherefore Fund(riva, thalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The netta does not eat the brynn. The netta does not eat the hilliary. The netta is draining. The netta is unartistic. The netta is awesome. The netta enquire the brynn. The netta enquire the hilliary. The malina groak the netta. The malina deaminate the brynn. The malina does not visit the netta. The malina enquire the hilliary. The brynn enquire the netta. The hilliary does not eat the brynn. The hilliary is malicious. The hilliary deaminate the malina. The hilliary enquire the brynn. If something enquire the malina and the malina enquire the brynn then the brynn groak the hilliary. If the malina groak the brynn then the malina does not like the brynn. If something enquire the brynn then it enquire the hilliary. If the netta groak the malina and the malina enquire the hilliary then the hilliary is outfitted. If something is outfitted then it is draining. If something enquire the netta then the netta groak the malina. If something is unartistic and it deaminate the brynn then it groak the hilliary. If something groak the netta and it does not visit the hilliary then the hilliary deaminate the brynn. The hilliary does not like the malina.", "logic": "\nnot Groak(netta, brynn)\nnot Groak(netta, hilliary)\nDraining(netta)\nUnartistic(netta)\nAwesome(netta)\nEnquire(netta, brynn)\nEnquire(netta, hilliary)\nGroak(malina, netta)\nDeaminate(malina, brynn)\nnot Enquire(malina, netta)\nEnquire(malina, hilliary)\nEnquire(brynn, netta)\nnot Groak(hilliary, brynn)\nMalicious(hilliary)\nDeaminate(hilliary, malina)\nEnquire(hilliary, brynn)\nforall x (Enquire(x, malina) and Enquire(malina, brynn) -> Groak(brynn, hilliary))\nGroak(malina, brynn) -> not Deaminate(malina, brynn)\nforall x (Enquire(x, brynn) -> Enquire(x, hilliary))\nGroak(netta, malina) and Enquire(malina, hilliary) -> Outfitted(hilliary)\nforall x (Outfitted(x) -> Draining(x))\nforall x (Enquire(x, netta) -> Groak(netta, malina))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) and Deaminate(x, brynn) -> Groak(x, hilliary))\nforall x (Groak(x, netta) and not Enquire(x, hilliary) -> Deaminate(hilliary, brynn))\n\nnot Deaminate(hilliary, malina)\n\ntherefore Deaminate(hilliary, malina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The roxanne does not eat the beulah. The roxanne does not eat the lonna. The roxanne is coeval. The roxanne is porose. The roxanne is arresting. The roxanne molt the beulah. The roxanne molt the lonna. The benedicta expire the roxanne. The benedicta salute the beulah. The benedicta does not visit the roxanne. The benedicta molt the lonna. The beulah molt the roxanne. The lonna does not eat the beulah. The lonna is violated. The lonna salute the benedicta. The lonna molt the beulah. If something molt the benedicta and the benedicta molt the beulah then the beulah expire the lonna. If the benedicta expire the beulah then the benedicta does not like the beulah. If something molt the beulah then it molt the lonna. If the roxanne expire the benedicta and the benedicta molt the lonna then the lonna is brotherly. If something is brotherly then it is coeval. If something molt the roxanne then the roxanne expire the benedicta. If something is porose and it salute the beulah then it expire the lonna. If something expire the roxanne and it does not visit the lonna then the lonna salute the beulah. The roxanne expire the benedicta.", "logic": "\nnot Expire(roxanne, beulah)\nnot Expire(roxanne, lonna)\nCoeval(roxanne)\nPorose(roxanne)\nArresting(roxanne)\nMolt(roxanne, beulah)\nMolt(roxanne, lonna)\nExpire(benedicta, roxanne)\nSalute(benedicta, beulah)\nnot Molt(benedicta, roxanne)\nMolt(benedicta, lonna)\nMolt(beulah, roxanne)\nnot Expire(lonna, beulah)\nViolated(lonna)\nSalute(lonna, benedicta)\nMolt(lonna, beulah)\nforall x (Molt(x, benedicta) and Molt(benedicta, beulah) -> Expire(beulah, lonna))\nExpire(benedicta, beulah) -> not Salute(benedicta, beulah)\nforall x (Molt(x, beulah) -> Molt(x, lonna))\nExpire(roxanne, benedicta) and Molt(benedicta, lonna) -> Brotherly(lonna)\nforall x (Brotherly(x) -> Coeval(x))\nforall x (Molt(x, roxanne) -> Expire(roxanne, benedicta))\nforall x (Porose(x) and Salute(x, beulah) -> Expire(x, lonna))\nforall x (Expire(x, roxanne) and not Molt(x, lonna) -> Salute(lonna, beulah))\n\nExpire(roxanne, benedicta)\n\nMolt(beulah, roxanne) and forall x (Molt(x, roxanne) -> Expire(roxanne, benedicta)) -> therefore Expire(roxanne, benedicta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The celina does not eat the jeanette. The celina does not eat the andy. The celina is gabonese. The celina is petrifying. The celina is matted. The celina lighten the jeanette. The celina lighten the andy. The roselle dissonate the celina. The roselle demo the jeanette. The roselle does not visit the celina. The roselle lighten the andy. The jeanette lighten the celina. The andy does not eat the jeanette. The andy is dandyish. The andy demo the roselle. The andy lighten the jeanette. If something lighten the roselle and the roselle lighten the jeanette then the jeanette dissonate the andy. If the roselle dissonate the jeanette then the roselle does not like the jeanette. If something lighten the jeanette then it lighten the andy. If the celina dissonate the roselle and the roselle lighten the andy then the andy is inhumed. If something is inhumed then it is gabonese. If something lighten the celina then the celina dissonate the roselle. If something is petrifying and it demo the jeanette then it dissonate the andy. If something dissonate the celina and it does not visit the andy then the andy demo the jeanette. The andy does not visit the andy.", "logic": "\nnot Dissonate(celina, jeanette)\nnot Dissonate(celina, andy)\nGabonese(celina)\nPetrifying(celina)\nMatted(celina)\nLighten(celina, jeanette)\nLighten(celina, andy)\nDissonate(roselle, celina)\nDemo(roselle, jeanette)\nnot Lighten(roselle, celina)\nLighten(roselle, andy)\nLighten(jeanette, celina)\nnot Dissonate(andy, jeanette)\nDandyish(andy)\nDemo(andy, roselle)\nLighten(andy, jeanette)\nforall x (Lighten(x, roselle) and Lighten(roselle, jeanette) -> Dissonate(jeanette, andy))\nDissonate(roselle, jeanette) -> not Demo(roselle, jeanette)\nforall x (Lighten(x, jeanette) -> Lighten(x, andy))\nDissonate(celina, roselle) and Lighten(roselle, andy) -> Inhumed(andy)\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Gabonese(x))\nforall x (Lighten(x, celina) -> Dissonate(celina, roselle))\nforall x (Petrifying(x) and Demo(x, jeanette) -> Dissonate(x, andy))\nforall x (Dissonate(x, celina) and not Lighten(x, andy) -> Demo(andy, jeanette))\n\nnot Lighten(andy, andy)\n\nLighten(andy, jeanette) and forall x (Lighten(x, jeanette) -> Lighten(x, andy)) -> therefore Lighten(andy, andy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The goddard does not eat the berenice. The goddard does not eat the les. The goddard is traitorous. The goddard is awol. The goddard is cycloidal. The goddard agnise the berenice. The goddard agnise the les. The theresa sightsee the goddard. The theresa bellow the berenice. The theresa does not visit the goddard. The theresa agnise the les. The berenice agnise the goddard. The les does not eat the berenice. The les is knifelike. The les bellow the theresa. The les agnise the berenice. If something agnise the theresa and the theresa agnise the berenice then the berenice sightsee the les. If the theresa sightsee the berenice then the theresa does not like the berenice. If something agnise the berenice then it agnise the les. If the goddard sightsee the theresa and the theresa agnise the les then the les is dipylon. If something is dipylon then it is traitorous. If something agnise the goddard then the goddard sightsee the theresa. If something is awol and it bellow the berenice then it sightsee the les. If something sightsee the goddard and it does not visit the les then the les bellow the berenice. The les is dipylon.", "logic": "\nnot Sightsee(goddard, berenice)\nnot Sightsee(goddard, les)\nTraitorous(goddard)\nAwol(goddard)\nCycloidal(goddard)\nAgnise(goddard, berenice)\nAgnise(goddard, les)\nSightsee(theresa, goddard)\nBellow(theresa, berenice)\nnot Agnise(theresa, goddard)\nAgnise(theresa, les)\nAgnise(berenice, goddard)\nnot Sightsee(les, berenice)\nKnifelike(les)\nBellow(les, theresa)\nAgnise(les, berenice)\nforall x (Agnise(x, theresa) and Agnise(theresa, berenice) -> Sightsee(berenice, les))\nSightsee(theresa, berenice) -> not Bellow(theresa, berenice)\nforall x (Agnise(x, berenice) -> Agnise(x, les))\nSightsee(goddard, theresa) and Agnise(theresa, les) -> Dipylon(les)\nforall x (Dipylon(x) -> Traitorous(x))\nforall x (Agnise(x, goddard) -> Sightsee(goddard, theresa))\nforall x (Awol(x) and Bellow(x, berenice) -> Sightsee(x, les))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, goddard) and not Agnise(x, les) -> Bellow(les, berenice))\n\nDipylon(les)\n\nAgnise(berenice, goddard) and forall x (Agnise(x, goddard) -> Sightsee(goddard, theresa)) -> therefore Sightsee(goddard, theresa) Sightsee(goddard, theresa) and Agnise(theresa, les) and Sightsee(goddard, theresa) and Agnise(theresa, les) -> Dipylon(les) -> therefore Dipylon(les)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The carlton does not eat the waleed. The carlton does not eat the genvieve. The carlton is unshared. The carlton is searing. The carlton is muddy. The carlton spectate the waleed. The carlton spectate the genvieve. The gunter bechance the carlton. The gunter retain the waleed. The gunter does not visit the carlton. The gunter spectate the genvieve. The waleed spectate the carlton. The genvieve does not eat the waleed. The genvieve is glum. The genvieve retain the gunter. The genvieve spectate the waleed. If something spectate the gunter and the gunter spectate the waleed then the waleed bechance the genvieve. If the gunter bechance the waleed then the gunter does not like the waleed. If something spectate the waleed then it spectate the genvieve. If the carlton bechance the gunter and the gunter spectate the genvieve then the genvieve is bored. If something is bored then it is unshared. If something spectate the carlton then the carlton bechance the gunter. If something is searing and it retain the waleed then it bechance the genvieve. If something bechance the carlton and it does not visit the genvieve then the genvieve retain the waleed. The genvieve is not bored.", "logic": "\nnot Bechance(carlton, waleed)\nnot Bechance(carlton, genvieve)\nUnshared(carlton)\nSearing(carlton)\nMuddy(carlton)\nSpectate(carlton, waleed)\nSpectate(carlton, genvieve)\nBechance(gunter, carlton)\nRetain(gunter, waleed)\nnot Spectate(gunter, carlton)\nSpectate(gunter, genvieve)\nSpectate(waleed, carlton)\nnot Bechance(genvieve, waleed)\nGlum(genvieve)\nRetain(genvieve, gunter)\nSpectate(genvieve, waleed)\nforall x (Spectate(x, gunter) and Spectate(gunter, waleed) -> Bechance(waleed, genvieve))\nBechance(gunter, waleed) -> not Retain(gunter, waleed)\nforall x (Spectate(x, waleed) -> Spectate(x, genvieve))\nBechance(carlton, gunter) and Spectate(gunter, genvieve) -> Bored(genvieve)\nforall x (Bored(x) -> Unshared(x))\nforall x (Spectate(x, carlton) -> Bechance(carlton, gunter))\nforall x (Searing(x) and Retain(x, waleed) -> Bechance(x, genvieve))\nforall x (Bechance(x, carlton) and not Spectate(x, genvieve) -> Retain(genvieve, waleed))\n\nnot Bored(genvieve)\n\nSpectate(waleed, carlton) and forall x (Spectate(x, carlton) -> Bechance(carlton, gunter)) -> therefore Bechance(carlton, gunter) Bechance(carlton, gunter) and Spectate(gunter, genvieve) and Bechance(carlton, gunter) and Spectate(gunter, genvieve) -> Bored(genvieve) -> therefore Bored(genvieve)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The nicky does not eat the carrol. The nicky does not eat the mahmoud. The nicky is subversive. The nicky is ulnar. The nicky is choosey. The nicky milk the carrol. The nicky milk the mahmoud. The kirbee glaciate the nicky. The kirbee mooch the carrol. The kirbee does not visit the nicky. The kirbee milk the mahmoud. The carrol milk the nicky. The mahmoud does not eat the carrol. The mahmoud is dissuasive. The mahmoud mooch the kirbee. The mahmoud milk the carrol. If something milk the kirbee and the kirbee milk the carrol then the carrol glaciate the mahmoud. If the kirbee glaciate the carrol then the kirbee does not like the carrol. If something milk the carrol then it milk the mahmoud. If the nicky glaciate the kirbee and the kirbee milk the mahmoud then the mahmoud is obedient. If something is obedient then it is subversive. If something milk the nicky then the nicky glaciate the kirbee. If something is ulnar and it mooch the carrol then it glaciate the mahmoud. If something glaciate the nicky and it does not visit the mahmoud then the mahmoud mooch the carrol. The mahmoud is subversive.", "logic": "\nnot Glaciate(nicky, carrol)\nnot Glaciate(nicky, mahmoud)\nSubversive(nicky)\nUlnar(nicky)\nChoosey(nicky)\nMilk(nicky, carrol)\nMilk(nicky, mahmoud)\nGlaciate(kirbee, nicky)\nMooch(kirbee, carrol)\nnot Milk(kirbee, nicky)\nMilk(kirbee, mahmoud)\nMilk(carrol, nicky)\nnot Glaciate(mahmoud, carrol)\nDissuasive(mahmoud)\nMooch(mahmoud, kirbee)\nMilk(mahmoud, carrol)\nforall x (Milk(x, kirbee) and Milk(kirbee, carrol) -> Glaciate(carrol, mahmoud))\nGlaciate(kirbee, carrol) -> not Mooch(kirbee, carrol)\nforall x (Milk(x, carrol) -> Milk(x, mahmoud))\nGlaciate(nicky, kirbee) and Milk(kirbee, mahmoud) -> Obedient(mahmoud)\nforall x (Obedient(x) -> Subversive(x))\nforall x (Milk(x, nicky) -> Glaciate(nicky, kirbee))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) and Mooch(x, carrol) -> Glaciate(x, mahmoud))\nforall x (Glaciate(x, nicky) and not Milk(x, mahmoud) -> Mooch(mahmoud, carrol))\n\nSubversive(mahmoud)\n\nMilk(carrol, nicky) and forall x (Milk(x, nicky) -> Glaciate(nicky, kirbee)) -> therefore Glaciate(nicky, kirbee) Glaciate(nicky, kirbee) and Milk(kirbee, mahmoud) and Glaciate(nicky, kirbee) and Milk(kirbee, mahmoud) -> Obedient(mahmoud) -> therefore Obedient(mahmoud) Obedient(mahmoud) and forall x (Obedient(x) -> Subversive(x)) -> therefore Subversive(mahmoud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The jessalin does not eat the izzi. The jessalin does not eat the edyth. The jessalin is intrastate. The jessalin is vulcanised. The jessalin is chewy. The jessalin windsurf the izzi. The jessalin windsurf the edyth. The vera chatter the jessalin. The vera magnetize the izzi. The vera does not visit the jessalin. The vera windsurf the edyth. The izzi windsurf the jessalin. The edyth does not eat the izzi. The edyth is brave. The edyth magnetize the vera. The edyth windsurf the izzi. If something windsurf the vera and the vera windsurf the izzi then the izzi chatter the edyth. If the vera chatter the izzi then the vera does not like the izzi. If something windsurf the izzi then it windsurf the edyth. If the jessalin chatter the vera and the vera windsurf the edyth then the edyth is unjointed. If something is unjointed then it is intrastate. If something windsurf the jessalin then the jessalin chatter the vera. If something is vulcanised and it magnetize the izzi then it chatter the edyth. If something chatter the jessalin and it does not visit the edyth then the edyth magnetize the izzi. The edyth is not intrastate.", "logic": "\nnot Chatter(jessalin, izzi)\nnot Chatter(jessalin, edyth)\nIntrastate(jessalin)\nVulcanised(jessalin)\nChewy(jessalin)\nWindsurf(jessalin, izzi)\nWindsurf(jessalin, edyth)\nChatter(vera, jessalin)\nMagnetize(vera, izzi)\nnot Windsurf(vera, jessalin)\nWindsurf(vera, edyth)\nWindsurf(izzi, jessalin)\nnot Chatter(edyth, izzi)\nBrave(edyth)\nMagnetize(edyth, vera)\nWindsurf(edyth, izzi)\nforall x (Windsurf(x, vera) and Windsurf(vera, izzi) -> Chatter(izzi, edyth))\nChatter(vera, izzi) -> not Magnetize(vera, izzi)\nforall x (Windsurf(x, izzi) -> Windsurf(x, edyth))\nChatter(jessalin, vera) and Windsurf(vera, edyth) -> Unjointed(edyth)\nforall x (Unjointed(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Windsurf(x, jessalin) -> Chatter(jessalin, vera))\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) and Magnetize(x, izzi) -> Chatter(x, edyth))\nforall x (Chatter(x, jessalin) and not Windsurf(x, edyth) -> Magnetize(edyth, izzi))\n\nnot Intrastate(edyth)\n\nWindsurf(izzi, jessalin) and forall x (Windsurf(x, jessalin) -> Chatter(jessalin, vera)) -> therefore Chatter(jessalin, vera) Chatter(jessalin, vera) and Windsurf(vera, edyth) and Chatter(jessalin, vera) and Windsurf(vera, edyth) -> Unjointed(edyth) -> therefore Unjointed(edyth) Unjointed(edyth) and forall x (Unjointed(x) -> Intrastate(x)) -> therefore Intrastate(edyth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The arnie does not eat the perrine. The arnie does not eat the tatiania. The arnie is dizygotic. The arnie is proximo. The arnie is swell. The arnie truckle the perrine. The arnie truckle the tatiania. The roarke pave the arnie. The roarke shadow the perrine. The roarke does not visit the arnie. The roarke truckle the tatiania. The perrine truckle the arnie. The tatiania does not eat the perrine. The tatiania is extremist. The tatiania shadow the roarke. The tatiania truckle the perrine. If something truckle the roarke and the roarke truckle the perrine then the perrine pave the tatiania. If the roarke pave the perrine then the roarke does not like the perrine. If something truckle the perrine then it truckle the tatiania. If the arnie pave the roarke and the roarke truckle the tatiania then the tatiania is indusial. If something is indusial then it is dizygotic. If something truckle the arnie then the arnie pave the roarke. If something is proximo and it shadow the perrine then it pave the tatiania. If something pave the arnie and it does not visit the tatiania then the tatiania shadow the perrine. The perrine does not visit the tatiania.", "logic": "\nnot Pave(arnie, perrine)\nnot Pave(arnie, tatiania)\nDizygotic(arnie)\nProximo(arnie)\nSwell(arnie)\nTruckle(arnie, perrine)\nTruckle(arnie, tatiania)\nPave(roarke, arnie)\nShadow(roarke, perrine)\nnot Truckle(roarke, arnie)\nTruckle(roarke, tatiania)\nTruckle(perrine, arnie)\nnot Pave(tatiania, perrine)\nExtremist(tatiania)\nShadow(tatiania, roarke)\nTruckle(tatiania, perrine)\nforall x (Truckle(x, roarke) and Truckle(roarke, perrine) -> Pave(perrine, tatiania))\nPave(roarke, perrine) -> not Shadow(roarke, perrine)\nforall x (Truckle(x, perrine) -> Truckle(x, tatiania))\nPave(arnie, roarke) and Truckle(roarke, tatiania) -> Indusial(tatiania)\nforall x (Indusial(x) -> Dizygotic(x))\nforall x (Truckle(x, arnie) -> Pave(arnie, roarke))\nforall x (Proximo(x) and Shadow(x, perrine) -> Pave(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Pave(x, arnie) and not Truckle(x, tatiania) -> Shadow(tatiania, perrine))\n\nnot Truckle(perrine, tatiania)\n\nforall x (Truckle(x, perrine) -> Truckle(x, tatiania)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The lisabeth does not eat the carolyne. The lisabeth does not eat the octavia. The lisabeth is shared. The lisabeth is winning. The lisabeth is nonsweet. The lisabeth unclasp the carolyne. The lisabeth unclasp the octavia. The olympia manoeuvre the lisabeth. The olympia hearken the carolyne. The olympia does not visit the lisabeth. The olympia unclasp the octavia. The carolyne unclasp the lisabeth. The octavia does not eat the carolyne. The octavia is teal. The octavia hearken the olympia. The octavia unclasp the carolyne. If something unclasp the olympia and the olympia unclasp the carolyne then the carolyne manoeuvre the octavia. If the olympia manoeuvre the carolyne then the olympia does not like the carolyne. If something unclasp the carolyne then it unclasp the octavia. If the lisabeth manoeuvre the olympia and the olympia unclasp the octavia then the octavia is spacy. If something is spacy then it is shared. If something unclasp the lisabeth then the lisabeth manoeuvre the olympia. If something is winning and it hearken the carolyne then it manoeuvre the octavia. If something manoeuvre the lisabeth and it does not visit the octavia then the octavia hearken the carolyne. The olympia is shared.", "logic": "\nnot Manoeuvre(lisabeth, carolyne)\nnot Manoeuvre(lisabeth, octavia)\nShared(lisabeth)\nWinning(lisabeth)\nNonsweet(lisabeth)\nUnclasp(lisabeth, carolyne)\nUnclasp(lisabeth, octavia)\nManoeuvre(olympia, lisabeth)\nHearken(olympia, carolyne)\nnot Unclasp(olympia, lisabeth)\nUnclasp(olympia, octavia)\nUnclasp(carolyne, lisabeth)\nnot Manoeuvre(octavia, carolyne)\nTeal(octavia)\nHearken(octavia, olympia)\nUnclasp(octavia, carolyne)\nforall x (Unclasp(x, olympia) and Unclasp(olympia, carolyne) -> Manoeuvre(carolyne, octavia))\nManoeuvre(olympia, carolyne) -> not Hearken(olympia, carolyne)\nforall x (Unclasp(x, carolyne) -> Unclasp(x, octavia))\nManoeuvre(lisabeth, olympia) and Unclasp(olympia, octavia) -> Spacy(octavia)\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> Shared(x))\nforall x (Unclasp(x, lisabeth) -> Manoeuvre(lisabeth, olympia))\nforall x (Winning(x) and Hearken(x, carolyne) -> Manoeuvre(x, octavia))\nforall x (Manoeuvre(x, lisabeth) and not Unclasp(x, octavia) -> Hearken(octavia, carolyne))\n\nShared(olympia)\n\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> Shared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The wendie does not eat the waldon. The wendie does not eat the walker. The wendie is matching. The wendie is globose. The wendie is forested. The wendie bong the waldon. The wendie bong the walker. The dory dower the wendie. The dory shower the waldon. The dory does not visit the wendie. The dory bong the walker. The waldon bong the wendie. The walker does not eat the waldon. The walker is nonstop. The walker shower the dory. The walker bong the waldon. If something bong the dory and the dory bong the waldon then the waldon dower the walker. If the dory dower the waldon then the dory does not like the waldon. If something bong the waldon then it bong the walker. If the wendie dower the dory and the dory bong the walker then the walker is coniferous. If something is coniferous then it is matching. If something bong the wendie then the wendie dower the dory. If something is globose and it shower the waldon then it dower the walker. If something dower the wendie and it does not visit the walker then the walker shower the waldon. The waldon is not matching.", "logic": "\nnot Dower(wendie, waldon)\nnot Dower(wendie, walker)\nMatching(wendie)\nGlobose(wendie)\nForested(wendie)\nBong(wendie, waldon)\nBong(wendie, walker)\nDower(dory, wendie)\nShower(dory, waldon)\nnot Bong(dory, wendie)\nBong(dory, walker)\nBong(waldon, wendie)\nnot Dower(walker, waldon)\nNonstop(walker)\nShower(walker, dory)\nBong(walker, waldon)\nforall x (Bong(x, dory) and Bong(dory, waldon) -> Dower(waldon, walker))\nDower(dory, waldon) -> not Shower(dory, waldon)\nforall x (Bong(x, waldon) -> Bong(x, walker))\nDower(wendie, dory) and Bong(dory, walker) -> Coniferous(walker)\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Bong(x, wendie) -> Dower(wendie, dory))\nforall x (Globose(x) and Shower(x, waldon) -> Dower(x, walker))\nforall x (Dower(x, wendie) and not Bong(x, walker) -> Shower(walker, waldon))\n\nnot Matching(waldon)\n\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> Matching(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The linea does not eat the parsifal. The linea does not eat the libbie. The linea is techy. The linea is impudent. The linea is vulturous. The linea bicycle the parsifal. The linea bicycle the libbie. The shara outlaw the linea. The shara shanghai the parsifal. The shara does not visit the linea. The shara bicycle the libbie. The parsifal bicycle the linea. The libbie does not eat the parsifal. The libbie is worth. The libbie shanghai the shara. The libbie bicycle the parsifal. If something bicycle the shara and the shara bicycle the parsifal then the parsifal outlaw the libbie. If the shara outlaw the parsifal then the shara does not like the parsifal. If something bicycle the parsifal then it bicycle the libbie. If the linea outlaw the shara and the shara bicycle the libbie then the libbie is obliged. If something is obliged then it is techy. If something bicycle the linea then the linea outlaw the shara. If something is impudent and it shanghai the parsifal then it outlaw the libbie. If something outlaw the linea and it does not visit the libbie then the libbie shanghai the parsifal. The shara outlaw the libbie.", "logic": "\nnot Outlaw(linea, parsifal)\nnot Outlaw(linea, libbie)\nTechy(linea)\nImpudent(linea)\nVulturous(linea)\nBicycle(linea, parsifal)\nBicycle(linea, libbie)\nOutlaw(shara, linea)\nShanghai(shara, parsifal)\nnot Bicycle(shara, linea)\nBicycle(shara, libbie)\nBicycle(parsifal, linea)\nnot Outlaw(libbie, parsifal)\nWorth(libbie)\nShanghai(libbie, shara)\nBicycle(libbie, parsifal)\nforall x (Bicycle(x, shara) and Bicycle(shara, parsifal) -> Outlaw(parsifal, libbie))\nOutlaw(shara, parsifal) -> not Shanghai(shara, parsifal)\nforall x (Bicycle(x, parsifal) -> Bicycle(x, libbie))\nOutlaw(linea, shara) and Bicycle(shara, libbie) -> Obliged(libbie)\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Techy(x))\nforall x (Bicycle(x, linea) -> Outlaw(linea, shara))\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Shanghai(x, parsifal) -> Outlaw(x, libbie))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, linea) and not Bicycle(x, libbie) -> Shanghai(libbie, parsifal))\n\nOutlaw(shara, libbie)\n\nforall x (Impudent(x) and Shanghai(x, parsifal) -> Outlaw(x, libbie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The tamar does not eat the archibald. The tamar does not eat the nixie. The tamar is telephonic. The tamar is movable. The tamar is baffling. The tamar behove the archibald. The tamar behove the nixie. The joscelin posture the tamar. The joscelin relearn the archibald. The joscelin does not visit the tamar. The joscelin behove the nixie. The archibald behove the tamar. The nixie does not eat the archibald. The nixie is maniacal. The nixie relearn the joscelin. The nixie behove the archibald. If something behove the joscelin and the joscelin behove the archibald then the archibald posture the nixie. If the joscelin posture the archibald then the joscelin does not like the archibald. If something behove the archibald then it behove the nixie. If the tamar posture the joscelin and the joscelin behove the nixie then the nixie is rampant. If something is rampant then it is telephonic. If something behove the tamar then the tamar posture the joscelin. If something is movable and it relearn the archibald then it posture the nixie. If something posture the tamar and it does not visit the nixie then the nixie relearn the archibald. The tamar does not like the tamar.", "logic": "\nnot Posture(tamar, archibald)\nnot Posture(tamar, nixie)\nTelephonic(tamar)\nMovable(tamar)\nBaffling(tamar)\nBehove(tamar, archibald)\nBehove(tamar, nixie)\nPosture(joscelin, tamar)\nRelearn(joscelin, archibald)\nnot Behove(joscelin, tamar)\nBehove(joscelin, nixie)\nBehove(archibald, tamar)\nnot Posture(nixie, archibald)\nManiacal(nixie)\nRelearn(nixie, joscelin)\nBehove(nixie, archibald)\nforall x (Behove(x, joscelin) and Behove(joscelin, archibald) -> Posture(archibald, nixie))\nPosture(joscelin, archibald) -> not Relearn(joscelin, archibald)\nforall x (Behove(x, archibald) -> Behove(x, nixie))\nPosture(tamar, joscelin) and Behove(joscelin, nixie) -> Rampant(nixie)\nforall x (Rampant(x) -> Telephonic(x))\nforall x (Behove(x, tamar) -> Posture(tamar, joscelin))\nforall x (Movable(x) and Relearn(x, archibald) -> Posture(x, nixie))\nforall x (Posture(x, tamar) and not Behove(x, nixie) -> Relearn(nixie, archibald))\n\nnot Relearn(tamar, tamar)\n\nnot Relearn(tamar, tamar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The kandace does not eat the osbourne. The kandace does not eat the will. The kandace is hateful. The kandace is allergenic. The kandace is pleading. The kandace slag the osbourne. The kandace slag the will. The sada devolve the kandace. The sada faze the osbourne. The sada does not visit the kandace. The sada slag the will. The osbourne slag the kandace. The will does not eat the osbourne. The will is adaptative. The will faze the sada. The will slag the osbourne. If something slag the sada and the sada slag the osbourne then the osbourne devolve the will. If the sada devolve the osbourne then the sada does not like the osbourne. If something slag the osbourne then it slag the will. If the kandace devolve the sada and the sada slag the will then the will is unexampled. If something is unexampled then it is hateful. If something slag the kandace then the kandace devolve the sada. If something is allergenic and it faze the osbourne then it devolve the will. If something devolve the kandace and it does not visit the will then the will faze the osbourne. The kandace is adaptative.", "logic": "\nnot Devolve(kandace, osbourne)\nnot Devolve(kandace, will)\nHateful(kandace)\nAllergenic(kandace)\nPleading(kandace)\nSlag(kandace, osbourne)\nSlag(kandace, will)\nDevolve(sada, kandace)\nFaze(sada, osbourne)\nnot Slag(sada, kandace)\nSlag(sada, will)\nSlag(osbourne, kandace)\nnot Devolve(will, osbourne)\nAdaptative(will)\nFaze(will, sada)\nSlag(will, osbourne)\nforall x (Slag(x, sada) and Slag(sada, osbourne) -> Devolve(osbourne, will))\nDevolve(sada, osbourne) -> not Faze(sada, osbourne)\nforall x (Slag(x, osbourne) -> Slag(x, will))\nDevolve(kandace, sada) and Slag(sada, will) -> Unexampled(will)\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Hateful(x))\nforall x (Slag(x, kandace) -> Devolve(kandace, sada))\nforall x (Allergenic(x) and Faze(x, osbourne) -> Devolve(x, will))\nforall x (Devolve(x, kandace) and not Slag(x, will) -> Faze(will, osbourne))\n\nAdaptative(kandace)\n\nAdaptative(kandace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The ardella does not eat the adolph. The ardella does not eat the engracia. The ardella is esurient. The ardella is irritating. The ardella is ecumenic. The ardella swosh the adolph. The ardella swosh the engracia. The yoko cantillate the ardella. The yoko minstrel the adolph. The yoko does not visit the ardella. The yoko swosh the engracia. The adolph swosh the ardella. The engracia does not eat the adolph. The engracia is benthal. The engracia minstrel the yoko. The engracia swosh the adolph. If something swosh the yoko and the yoko swosh the adolph then the adolph cantillate the engracia. If the yoko cantillate the adolph then the yoko does not like the adolph. If something swosh the adolph then it swosh the engracia. If the ardella cantillate the yoko and the yoko swosh the engracia then the engracia is dural. If something is dural then it is esurient. If something swosh the ardella then the ardella cantillate the yoko. If something is irritating and it minstrel the adolph then it cantillate the engracia. If something cantillate the ardella and it does not visit the engracia then the engracia minstrel the adolph. The yoko does not eat the adolph.", "logic": "\nnot Cantillate(ardella, adolph)\nnot Cantillate(ardella, engracia)\nEsurient(ardella)\nIrritating(ardella)\nEcumenic(ardella)\nSwosh(ardella, adolph)\nSwosh(ardella, engracia)\nCantillate(yoko, ardella)\nMinstrel(yoko, adolph)\nnot Swosh(yoko, ardella)\nSwosh(yoko, engracia)\nSwosh(adolph, ardella)\nnot Cantillate(engracia, adolph)\nBenthal(engracia)\nMinstrel(engracia, yoko)\nSwosh(engracia, adolph)\nforall x (Swosh(x, yoko) and Swosh(yoko, adolph) -> Cantillate(adolph, engracia))\nCantillate(yoko, adolph) -> not Minstrel(yoko, adolph)\nforall x (Swosh(x, adolph) -> Swosh(x, engracia))\nCantillate(ardella, yoko) and Swosh(yoko, engracia) -> Dural(engracia)\nforall x (Dural(x) -> Esurient(x))\nforall x (Swosh(x, ardella) -> Cantillate(ardella, yoko))\nforall x (Irritating(x) and Minstrel(x, adolph) -> Cantillate(x, engracia))\nforall x (Cantillate(x, ardella) and not Swosh(x, engracia) -> Minstrel(engracia, adolph))\n\nnot Cantillate(yoko, adolph)\n\nnot Cantillate(yoko, adolph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The sheridan does not eat the hedy. The sheridan does not eat the charleen. The sheridan is encircled. The sheridan is soporific. The sheridan is uncleared. The sheridan crawfish the hedy. The sheridan crawfish the charleen. The dode delegate the sheridan. The dode offset the hedy. The dode does not visit the sheridan. The dode crawfish the charleen. The hedy crawfish the sheridan. The charleen does not eat the hedy. The charleen is crushing. The charleen offset the dode. The charleen crawfish the hedy. If something crawfish the dode and the dode crawfish the hedy then the hedy delegate the charleen. If the dode delegate the hedy then the dode does not like the hedy. If something crawfish the hedy then it crawfish the charleen. If the sheridan delegate the dode and the dode crawfish the charleen then the charleen is quaggy. If something is quaggy then it is encircled. If something crawfish the sheridan then the sheridan delegate the dode. If something is soporific and it offset the hedy then it delegate the charleen. If something delegate the sheridan and it does not visit the charleen then the charleen offset the hedy. The charleen is soporific.", "logic": "\nnot Delegate(sheridan, hedy)\nnot Delegate(sheridan, charleen)\nEncircled(sheridan)\nSoporific(sheridan)\nUncleared(sheridan)\nCrawfish(sheridan, hedy)\nCrawfish(sheridan, charleen)\nDelegate(dode, sheridan)\nOffset(dode, hedy)\nnot Crawfish(dode, sheridan)\nCrawfish(dode, charleen)\nCrawfish(hedy, sheridan)\nnot Delegate(charleen, hedy)\nCrushing(charleen)\nOffset(charleen, dode)\nCrawfish(charleen, hedy)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, dode) and Crawfish(dode, hedy) -> Delegate(hedy, charleen))\nDelegate(dode, hedy) -> not Offset(dode, hedy)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, hedy) -> Crawfish(x, charleen))\nDelegate(sheridan, dode) and Crawfish(dode, charleen) -> Quaggy(charleen)\nforall x (Quaggy(x) -> Encircled(x))\nforall x (Crawfish(x, sheridan) -> Delegate(sheridan, dode))\nforall x (Soporific(x) and Offset(x, hedy) -> Delegate(x, charleen))\nforall x (Delegate(x, sheridan) and not Crawfish(x, charleen) -> Offset(charleen, hedy))\n\nSoporific(charleen)\n\nSoporific(charleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-942"} {"premises": "The brietta bowl the prudi. The brietta is elvish. The prudi is elvish. If something deplumate the brietta and the brietta bowl the prudi then the prudi is rackety. If something is elvish then it does not visit the prudi. The prudi is elvish.", "logic": "\nBowl(brietta, prudi)\nElvish(brietta)\nElvish(prudi)\nforall x (Deplumate(x, brietta) and Bowl(brietta, prudi) -> Rackety(prudi))\nforall x (Elvish(x) -> not Frighten(x, prudi))\n\nElvish(prudi)\n\ntherefore Elvish(prudi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "The charlena quantize the bart. The charlena is looseleaf. The bart is looseleaf. If something carnalize the charlena and the charlena quantize the bart then the bart is confining. If something is looseleaf then it does not visit the bart. The charlena is not looseleaf.", "logic": "\nQuantize(charlena, bart)\nLooseleaf(charlena)\nLooseleaf(bart)\nforall x (Carnalize(x, charlena) and Quantize(charlena, bart) -> Confining(bart))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> not Reallocate(x, bart))\n\nnot Looseleaf(charlena)\n\ntherefore Looseleaf(charlena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "The lily bugger the forbes. The lily is cerebral. The forbes is cerebral. If something entrain the lily and the lily bugger the forbes then the forbes is excess. If something is cerebral then it does not visit the forbes. The lily does not visit the forbes.", "logic": "\nBugger(lily, forbes)\nCerebral(lily)\nCerebral(forbes)\nforall x (Entrain(x, lily) and Bugger(lily, forbes) -> Excess(forbes))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> not Hybridize(x, forbes))\n\nnot Hybridize(lily, forbes)\n\nCerebral(lily) and forall x (Cerebral(x) -> not Hybridize(x, forbes)) -> therefore not Hybridize(lily, forbes)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "The eve mutate the theodore. The eve is anomalous. The theodore is anomalous. If something bombinate the eve and the eve mutate the theodore then the theodore is icteric. If something is anomalous then it does not visit the theodore. The eve incite the theodore.", "logic": "\nMutate(eve, theodore)\nAnomalous(eve)\nAnomalous(theodore)\nforall x (Bombinate(x, eve) and Mutate(eve, theodore) -> Icteric(theodore))\nforall x (Anomalous(x) -> not Incite(x, theodore))\n\nIncite(eve, theodore)\n\nAnomalous(eve) and forall x (Anomalous(x) -> not Incite(x, theodore)) -> therefore not Incite(eve, theodore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "The delila approbate the ignace. The delila is drippy. The ignace is drippy. If something punt the delila and the delila approbate the ignace then the ignace is earthen. If something is drippy then it does not visit the ignace. The ignace is not earthen.", "logic": "\nApprobate(delila, ignace)\nDrippy(delila)\nDrippy(ignace)\nforall x (Punt(x, delila) and Approbate(delila, ignace) -> Earthen(ignace))\nforall x (Drippy(x) -> not Misjudge(x, ignace))\n\nnot Earthen(ignace)\n\nforall x (Punt(x, delila) and Approbate(delila, ignace) -> Earthen(ignace)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "The carter languish the wenona. The carter is automatic. The wenona is automatic. If something bastardise the carter and the carter languish the wenona then the wenona is anasarcous. If something is automatic then it does not visit the wenona. The carter is blue.", "logic": "\nLanguish(carter, wenona)\nAutomatic(carter)\nAutomatic(wenona)\nforall x (Bastardise(x, carter) and Languish(carter, wenona) -> Anasarcous(wenona))\nforall x (Automatic(x) -> not Maunder(x, wenona))\n\nBlue(carter)\n\nBlue(carter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "The ashleigh trickle the caesar. The ashleigh is decorated. The caesar is decorated. If something dissociate the ashleigh and the ashleigh trickle the caesar then the caesar is atavistic. If something is decorated then it does not visit the caesar. The caesar is not blue.", "logic": "\nTrickle(ashleigh, caesar)\nDecorated(ashleigh)\nDecorated(caesar)\nforall x (Dissociate(x, ashleigh) and Trickle(ashleigh, caesar) -> Atavistic(caesar))\nforall x (Decorated(x) -> not Sexualize(x, caesar))\n\nnot Blue(caesar)\n\nnot Blue(caesar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "The vere capture the vasily. The vere is fulgid. The vasily is fulgid. If something squirm the vere and the vere capture the vasily then the vasily is uncombined. If something is fulgid then it does not visit the vasily. The vere is uncombined.", "logic": "\nCapture(vere, vasily)\nFulgid(vere)\nFulgid(vasily)\nforall x (Squirm(x, vere) and Capture(vere, vasily) -> Uncombined(vasily))\nforall x (Fulgid(x) -> not Beacon(x, vasily))\n\nUncombined(vere)\n\nUncombined(vere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-191"} {"premises": "Sharyl is formulaic. Holly is blowsy. Ciel is blowsy. Ervin is blowsy. All cramped, formulaic things are broached. If Sharyl is cramped then Sharyl is iberian. If something is blowsy then it is cramped. All iberian things are cramped. All formulaic things are blowsy. If Ervin is expected then Ervin is blowsy. Holly is blowsy.", "logic": "\nFormulaic(sharyl)\nBlowsy(holly)\nBlowsy(ciel)\nBlowsy(ervin)\nforall x (Cramped(x) and Formulaic(x) -> Broached(x))\nCramped(sharyl) -> Iberian(sharyl)\nforall x (Blowsy(x) -> Cramped(x))\nforall x (Iberian(x) -> Cramped(x))\nforall x (Formulaic(x) -> Blowsy(x))\nExpected(ervin) -> Blowsy(ervin)\n\nBlowsy(holly)\n\ntherefore Blowsy(holly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Ender is vulcanised. Janna is chestnut. Jacquelin is chestnut. Ivory is chestnut. All vermicular, vulcanised things are sick. If Ender is vermicular then Ender is buff. If something is chestnut then it is vermicular. All buff things are vermicular. All vulcanised things are chestnut. If Ivory is supposable then Ivory is chestnut. Janna is not chestnut.", "logic": "\nVulcanised(ender)\nChestnut(janna)\nChestnut(jacquelin)\nChestnut(ivory)\nforall x (Vermicular(x) and Vulcanised(x) -> Sick(x))\nVermicular(ender) -> Buff(ender)\nforall x (Chestnut(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Buff(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) -> Chestnut(x))\nSupposable(ivory) -> Chestnut(ivory)\n\nnot Chestnut(janna)\n\ntherefore Chestnut(janna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Billy is dutiable. Harlin is quebecois. Bernadine is quebecois. Liorah is quebecois. All nightlong, dutiable things are jumentous. If Billy is nightlong then Billy is polemical. If something is quebecois then it is nightlong. All polemical things are nightlong. All dutiable things are quebecois. If Liorah is chained then Liorah is quebecois. Billy is quebecois.", "logic": "\nDutiable(billy)\nQuebecois(harlin)\nQuebecois(bernadine)\nQuebecois(liorah)\nforall x (Nightlong(x) and Dutiable(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nNightlong(billy) -> Polemical(billy)\nforall x (Quebecois(x) -> Nightlong(x))\nforall x (Polemical(x) -> Nightlong(x))\nforall x (Dutiable(x) -> Quebecois(x))\nChained(liorah) -> Quebecois(liorah)\n\nQuebecois(billy)\n\nDutiable(billy) and forall x (Dutiable(x) -> Quebecois(x)) -> therefore Quebecois(billy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Rabbi is pyrectic. Edgar is conforming. Cobby is conforming. Baldwin is conforming. All unbiassed, pyrectic things are divided. If Rabbi is unbiassed then Rabbi is unfeeling. If something is conforming then it is unbiassed. All unfeeling things are unbiassed. All pyrectic things are conforming. If Baldwin is grand then Baldwin is conforming. Edgar is not unbiassed.", "logic": "\nPyrectic(rabbi)\nConforming(edgar)\nConforming(cobby)\nConforming(baldwin)\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Pyrectic(x) -> Divided(x))\nUnbiassed(rabbi) -> Unfeeling(rabbi)\nforall x (Conforming(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Unfeeling(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) -> Conforming(x))\nGrand(baldwin) -> Conforming(baldwin)\n\nnot Unbiassed(edgar)\n\nConforming(edgar) and forall x (Conforming(x) -> Unbiassed(x)) -> therefore Unbiassed(edgar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Eilis is continued. Florina is mitigated. Abbey is mitigated. Sherlock is mitigated. All foetal, continued things are submarine. If Eilis is foetal then Eilis is bacteremic. If something is mitigated then it is foetal. All bacteremic things are foetal. All continued things are mitigated. If Sherlock is obese then Sherlock is mitigated. Eilis is foetal.", "logic": "\nContinued(eilis)\nMitigated(florina)\nMitigated(abbey)\nMitigated(sherlock)\nforall x (Foetal(x) and Continued(x) -> Submarine(x))\nFoetal(eilis) -> Bacteremic(eilis)\nforall x (Mitigated(x) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Bacteremic(x) -> Foetal(x))\nforall x (Continued(x) -> Mitigated(x))\nObese(sherlock) -> Mitigated(sherlock)\n\nFoetal(eilis)\n\nContinued(eilis) and forall x (Continued(x) -> Mitigated(x)) -> therefore Mitigated(eilis) Mitigated(eilis) and forall x (Mitigated(x) -> Foetal(x)) -> therefore Foetal(eilis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Ramsey is appressed. Teador is past. Nada is past. Janka is past. All sulcate, appressed things are actinic. If Ramsey is sulcate then Ramsey is impolite. If something is past then it is sulcate. All impolite things are sulcate. All appressed things are past. If Janka is ornate then Janka is past. Ramsey is not sulcate.", "logic": "\nAppressed(ramsey)\nPast(teador)\nPast(nada)\nPast(janka)\nforall x (Sulcate(x) and Appressed(x) -> Actinic(x))\nSulcate(ramsey) -> Impolite(ramsey)\nforall x (Past(x) -> Sulcate(x))\nforall x (Impolite(x) -> Sulcate(x))\nforall x (Appressed(x) -> Past(x))\nOrnate(janka) -> Past(janka)\n\nnot Sulcate(ramsey)\n\nAppressed(ramsey) and forall x (Appressed(x) -> Past(x)) -> therefore Past(ramsey) Past(ramsey) and forall x (Past(x) -> Sulcate(x)) -> therefore Sulcate(ramsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Yonina is unsated. Claus is whiskered. Aldus is whiskered. Hyman is whiskered. All fulfilled, unsated things are unshackled. If Yonina is fulfilled then Yonina is brawny. If something is whiskered then it is fulfilled. All brawny things are fulfilled. All unsated things are whiskered. If Hyman is pale then Hyman is whiskered. Yonina is unshackled.", "logic": "\nUnsated(yonina)\nWhiskered(claus)\nWhiskered(aldus)\nWhiskered(hyman)\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) and Unsated(x) -> Unshackled(x))\nFulfilled(yonina) -> Brawny(yonina)\nforall x (Whiskered(x) -> Fulfilled(x))\nforall x (Brawny(x) -> Fulfilled(x))\nforall x (Unsated(x) -> Whiskered(x))\nPale(hyman) -> Whiskered(hyman)\n\nUnshackled(yonina)\n\nUnsated(yonina) and forall x (Unsated(x) -> Whiskered(x)) -> therefore Whiskered(yonina) Whiskered(yonina) and forall x (Whiskered(x) -> Fulfilled(x)) -> therefore Fulfilled(yonina) Fulfilled(yonina) and Unsated(yonina) and forall x (Fulfilled(x) and Unsated(x) -> Unshackled(x)) -> therefore Unshackled(yonina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Caroline is dickey. Dacey is faustian. Woochang is faustian. Phyllys is faustian. All charnel, dickey things are ageing. If Caroline is charnel then Caroline is auricular. If something is faustian then it is charnel. All auricular things are charnel. All dickey things are faustian. If Phyllys is corrective then Phyllys is faustian. Caroline is not auricular.", "logic": "\nDickey(caroline)\nFaustian(dacey)\nFaustian(woochang)\nFaustian(phyllys)\nforall x (Charnel(x) and Dickey(x) -> Ageing(x))\nCharnel(caroline) -> Auricular(caroline)\nforall x (Faustian(x) -> Charnel(x))\nforall x (Auricular(x) -> Charnel(x))\nforall x (Dickey(x) -> Faustian(x))\nCorrective(phyllys) -> Faustian(phyllys)\n\nnot Auricular(caroline)\n\nDickey(caroline) and forall x (Dickey(x) -> Faustian(x)) -> therefore Faustian(caroline) Faustian(caroline) and forall x (Faustian(x) -> Charnel(x)) -> therefore Charnel(caroline) Charnel(caroline) and Charnel(caroline) -> Auricular(caroline) -> therefore Auricular(caroline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Davey is enforced. Luciano is emphasized. Jeb is emphasized. Sid is emphasized. All moresque, enforced things are moravian. If Davey is moresque then Davey is myelinic. If something is emphasized then it is moresque. All myelinic things are moresque. All enforced things are emphasized. If Sid is wobbling then Sid is emphasized. Jeb is not moravian.", "logic": "\nEnforced(davey)\nEmphasized(luciano)\nEmphasized(jeb)\nEmphasized(sid)\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Enforced(x) -> Moravian(x))\nMoresque(davey) -> Myelinic(davey)\nforall x (Emphasized(x) -> Moresque(x))\nforall x (Myelinic(x) -> Moresque(x))\nforall x (Enforced(x) -> Emphasized(x))\nWobbling(sid) -> Emphasized(sid)\n\nnot Moravian(jeb)\n\nforall x (Moresque(x) and Enforced(x) -> Moravian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Milton is pulmonic. Clovis is sweltering. Roch is sweltering. Alene is sweltering. All miscible, pulmonic things are convulsive. If Milton is miscible then Milton is sugary. If something is sweltering then it is miscible. All sugary things are miscible. All pulmonic things are sweltering. If Alene is hieratical then Alene is sweltering. Clovis is convulsive.", "logic": "\nPulmonic(milton)\nSweltering(clovis)\nSweltering(roch)\nSweltering(alene)\nforall x (Miscible(x) and Pulmonic(x) -> Convulsive(x))\nMiscible(milton) -> Sugary(milton)\nforall x (Sweltering(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Sugary(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Pulmonic(x) -> Sweltering(x))\nHieratical(alene) -> Sweltering(alene)\n\nConvulsive(clovis)\n\nforall x (Miscible(x) and Pulmonic(x) -> Convulsive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Pavla is mustached. Mona is luxurious. Cathleen is luxurious. Desmund is luxurious. All scowling, mustached things are satiate. If Pavla is scowling then Pavla is lowbrowed. If something is luxurious then it is scowling. All lowbrowed things are scowling. All mustached things are luxurious. If Desmund is copernican then Desmund is luxurious. Desmund is not satiate.", "logic": "\nMustached(pavla)\nLuxurious(mona)\nLuxurious(cathleen)\nLuxurious(desmund)\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Mustached(x) -> Satiate(x))\nScowling(pavla) -> Lowbrowed(pavla)\nforall x (Luxurious(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Mustached(x) -> Luxurious(x))\nCopernican(desmund) -> Luxurious(desmund)\n\nnot Satiate(desmund)\n\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Mustached(x) -> Satiate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Clemmie is veinal. Astra is ponderable. Rozanne is ponderable. Mylo is ponderable. All fledgling, veinal things are congealed. If Clemmie is fledgling then Clemmie is serbian. If something is ponderable then it is fledgling. All serbian things are fledgling. All veinal things are ponderable. If Mylo is segmented then Mylo is ponderable. Rozanne is segmented.", "logic": "\nVeinal(clemmie)\nPonderable(astra)\nPonderable(rozanne)\nPonderable(mylo)\nforall x (Fledgling(x) and Veinal(x) -> Congealed(x))\nFledgling(clemmie) -> Serbian(clemmie)\nforall x (Ponderable(x) -> Fledgling(x))\nforall x (Serbian(x) -> Fledgling(x))\nforall x (Veinal(x) -> Ponderable(x))\nSegmented(mylo) -> Ponderable(mylo)\n\nSegmented(rozanne)\n\nSegmented(rozanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Harmon is jammed. Margy is portuguese. Emmalee is portuguese. Prisca is portuguese. All musty, jammed things are biform. If Harmon is musty then Harmon is parametric. If something is portuguese then it is musty. All parametric things are musty. All jammed things are portuguese. If Prisca is awake then Prisca is portuguese. Emmalee is not kind.", "logic": "\nJammed(harmon)\nPortuguese(margy)\nPortuguese(emmalee)\nPortuguese(prisca)\nforall x (Musty(x) and Jammed(x) -> Biform(x))\nMusty(harmon) -> Parametric(harmon)\nforall x (Portuguese(x) -> Musty(x))\nforall x (Parametric(x) -> Musty(x))\nforall x (Jammed(x) -> Portuguese(x))\nAwake(prisca) -> Portuguese(prisca)\n\nnot Kind(emmalee)\n\nnot Kind(emmalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Wendi is drupaceous. Stillman is frightened. Jesse is frightened. Annamaria is frightened. All sexual, drupaceous things are prideful. If Wendi is sexual then Wendi is economical. If something is frightened then it is sexual. All economical things are sexual. All drupaceous things are frightened. If Annamaria is adust then Annamaria is frightened. Wendi is kind.", "logic": "\nDrupaceous(wendi)\nFrightened(stillman)\nFrightened(jesse)\nFrightened(annamaria)\nforall x (Sexual(x) and Drupaceous(x) -> Prideful(x))\nSexual(wendi) -> Economical(wendi)\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Sexual(x))\nforall x (Economical(x) -> Sexual(x))\nforall x (Drupaceous(x) -> Frightened(x))\nAdust(annamaria) -> Frightened(annamaria)\n\nKind(wendi)\n\nKind(wendi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Charlot is laryngeal. Myles is caulked. Julianna is caulked. Doti is caulked. All separated, laryngeal things are milanese. If Charlot is separated then Charlot is wondrous. If something is caulked then it is separated. All wondrous things are separated. All laryngeal things are caulked. If Doti is periodic then Doti is caulked. Myles is not kind.", "logic": "\nLaryngeal(charlot)\nCaulked(myles)\nCaulked(julianna)\nCaulked(doti)\nforall x (Separated(x) and Laryngeal(x) -> Milanese(x))\nSeparated(charlot) -> Wondrous(charlot)\nforall x (Caulked(x) -> Separated(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Separated(x))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Caulked(x))\nPeriodic(doti) -> Caulked(doti)\n\nnot Kind(myles)\n\nnot Kind(myles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Edythe is unifilar. Brice is antecedent. Rafaelita is antecedent. Britt is antecedent. All preteen, unifilar things are riblike. If Edythe is preteen then Edythe is unkept. If something is antecedent then it is preteen. All unkept things are preteen. All unifilar things are antecedent. If Britt is mown then Britt is antecedent. Rafaelita is unifilar.", "logic": "\nUnifilar(edythe)\nAntecedent(brice)\nAntecedent(rafaelita)\nAntecedent(britt)\nforall x (Preteen(x) and Unifilar(x) -> Riblike(x))\nPreteen(edythe) -> Unkept(edythe)\nforall x (Antecedent(x) -> Preteen(x))\nforall x (Unkept(x) -> Preteen(x))\nforall x (Unifilar(x) -> Antecedent(x))\nMown(britt) -> Antecedent(britt)\n\nUnifilar(rafaelita)\n\nUnifilar(rafaelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1182"} {"premises": "Cybill is corrupted. Cybill is fatalistic. Cybill is killable. Robinetta is unstaged. Robinetta is corrupted. Robinetta is maxi. Robinetta is fatalistic. Robinetta is defoliate. Floyd is plowed. Floyd is corrupted. Floyd is maxi. Floyd is defoliate. Young things are plowed. If something is plowed and corrupted then it is unstaged. Cold, maxi things are fatalistic. If something is defoliate then it is fatalistic. Cold, corrupted things are maxi. If Cybill is killable then Cybill is defoliate. Robinetta is unstaged.", "logic": "\nCorrupted(cybill)\nFatalistic(cybill)\nKillable(cybill)\nUnstaged(robinetta)\nCorrupted(robinetta)\nMaxi(robinetta)\nFatalistic(robinetta)\nDefoliate(robinetta)\nPlowed(floyd)\nCorrupted(floyd)\nMaxi(floyd)\nDefoliate(floyd)\nforall x (Defoliate(x) -> Plowed(x))\nforall x (Plowed(x) and Corrupted(x) -> Unstaged(x))\nforall x (Unstaged(x) and Maxi(x) -> Fatalistic(x))\nforall x (Defoliate(x) -> Fatalistic(x))\nforall x (Unstaged(x) and Corrupted(x) -> Maxi(x))\nKillable(cybill) -> Defoliate(cybill)\n\nUnstaged(robinetta)\n\ntherefore Unstaged(robinetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Alisha is algerian. Alisha is unfastened. Alisha is coenobitic. Belia is antiguan. Belia is algerian. Belia is vaporish. Belia is unfastened. Belia is sopranino. Fania is carolean. Fania is algerian. Fania is vaporish. Fania is sopranino. Young things are carolean. If something is carolean and algerian then it is antiguan. Cold, vaporish things are unfastened. If something is sopranino then it is unfastened. Cold, algerian things are vaporish. If Alisha is coenobitic then Alisha is sopranino. Belia is not antiguan.", "logic": "\nAlgerian(alisha)\nUnfastened(alisha)\nCoenobitic(alisha)\nAntiguan(belia)\nAlgerian(belia)\nVaporish(belia)\nUnfastened(belia)\nSopranino(belia)\nCarolean(fania)\nAlgerian(fania)\nVaporish(fania)\nSopranino(fania)\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Carolean(x))\nforall x (Carolean(x) and Algerian(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Antiguan(x) and Vaporish(x) -> Unfastened(x))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Unfastened(x))\nforall x (Antiguan(x) and Algerian(x) -> Vaporish(x))\nCoenobitic(alisha) -> Sopranino(alisha)\n\nnot Antiguan(belia)\n\ntherefore Antiguan(belia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Leoine is intensive. Leoine is zoophagous. Leoine is unifying. Sid is narcotic. Sid is intensive. Sid is fancy. Sid is zoophagous. Sid is algonquian. Hamid is araneidan. Hamid is intensive. Hamid is fancy. Hamid is algonquian. Young things are araneidan. If something is araneidan and intensive then it is narcotic. Cold, fancy things are zoophagous. If something is algonquian then it is zoophagous. Cold, intensive things are fancy. If Leoine is unifying then Leoine is algonquian. Hamid is narcotic.", "logic": "\nIntensive(leoine)\nZoophagous(leoine)\nUnifying(leoine)\nNarcotic(sid)\nIntensive(sid)\nFancy(sid)\nZoophagous(sid)\nAlgonquian(sid)\nAraneidan(hamid)\nIntensive(hamid)\nFancy(hamid)\nAlgonquian(hamid)\nforall x (Algonquian(x) -> Araneidan(x))\nforall x (Araneidan(x) and Intensive(x) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Fancy(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\nforall x (Algonquian(x) -> Zoophagous(x))\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Intensive(x) -> Fancy(x))\nUnifying(leoine) -> Algonquian(leoine)\n\nNarcotic(hamid)\n\nAraneidan(hamid) and Intensive(hamid) and forall x (Araneidan(x) and Intensive(x) -> Narcotic(x)) -> therefore Narcotic(hamid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Maggie is freudian. Maggie is lathery. Maggie is thrilled. Luciana is subjective. Luciana is freudian. Luciana is reasonable. Luciana is lathery. Luciana is azido. Herminia is ternary. Herminia is freudian. Herminia is reasonable. Herminia is azido. Young things are ternary. If something is ternary and freudian then it is subjective. Cold, reasonable things are lathery. If something is azido then it is lathery. Cold, freudian things are reasonable. If Maggie is thrilled then Maggie is azido. Maggie is not azido.", "logic": "\nFreudian(maggie)\nLathery(maggie)\nThrilled(maggie)\nSubjective(luciana)\nFreudian(luciana)\nReasonable(luciana)\nLathery(luciana)\nAzido(luciana)\nTernary(herminia)\nFreudian(herminia)\nReasonable(herminia)\nAzido(herminia)\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Ternary(x))\nforall x (Ternary(x) and Freudian(x) -> Subjective(x))\nforall x (Subjective(x) and Reasonable(x) -> Lathery(x))\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Lathery(x))\nforall x (Subjective(x) and Freudian(x) -> Reasonable(x))\nThrilled(maggie) -> Azido(maggie)\n\nnot Azido(maggie)\n\nThrilled(maggie) and Thrilled(maggie) -> Azido(maggie) -> therefore Azido(maggie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Zacharie is signed. Zacharie is albitic. Zacharie is perceived. Perl is appalling. Perl is signed. Perl is acanthoid. Perl is albitic. Perl is extensible. Delly is preanal. Delly is signed. Delly is acanthoid. Delly is extensible. Young things are preanal. If something is preanal and signed then it is appalling. Cold, acanthoid things are albitic. If something is extensible then it is albitic. Cold, signed things are acanthoid. If Zacharie is perceived then Zacharie is extensible. Zacharie is preanal.", "logic": "\nSigned(zacharie)\nAlbitic(zacharie)\nPerceived(zacharie)\nAppalling(perl)\nSigned(perl)\nAcanthoid(perl)\nAlbitic(perl)\nExtensible(perl)\nPreanal(delly)\nSigned(delly)\nAcanthoid(delly)\nExtensible(delly)\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) and Signed(x) -> Appalling(x))\nforall x (Appalling(x) and Acanthoid(x) -> Albitic(x))\nforall x (Extensible(x) -> Albitic(x))\nforall x (Appalling(x) and Signed(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\nPerceived(zacharie) -> Extensible(zacharie)\n\nPreanal(zacharie)\n\nPerceived(zacharie) and Perceived(zacharie) -> Extensible(zacharie) -> therefore Extensible(zacharie) Extensible(zacharie) and forall x (Extensible(x) -> Preanal(x)) -> therefore Preanal(zacharie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Corilla is springy. Corilla is null. Corilla is apelike. Ailina is salaried. Ailina is springy. Ailina is wired. Ailina is null. Ailina is biddable. Gregg is hieratical. Gregg is springy. Gregg is wired. Gregg is biddable. Young things are hieratical. If something is hieratical and springy then it is salaried. Cold, wired things are null. If something is biddable then it is null. Cold, springy things are wired. If Corilla is apelike then Corilla is biddable. Corilla is not hieratical.", "logic": "\nSpringy(corilla)\nNull(corilla)\nApelike(corilla)\nSalaried(ailina)\nSpringy(ailina)\nWired(ailina)\nNull(ailina)\nBiddable(ailina)\nHieratical(gregg)\nSpringy(gregg)\nWired(gregg)\nBiddable(gregg)\nforall x (Biddable(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Hieratical(x) and Springy(x) -> Salaried(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) and Wired(x) -> Null(x))\nforall x (Biddable(x) -> Null(x))\nforall x (Salaried(x) and Springy(x) -> Wired(x))\nApelike(corilla) -> Biddable(corilla)\n\nnot Hieratical(corilla)\n\nApelike(corilla) and Apelike(corilla) -> Biddable(corilla) -> therefore Biddable(corilla) Biddable(corilla) and forall x (Biddable(x) -> Hieratical(x)) -> therefore Hieratical(corilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Jemimah is cuddly. Jemimah is smiling. Jemimah is phagocytic. Ajay is jubilant. Ajay is cuddly. Ajay is overlying. Ajay is smiling. Ajay is matched. Amie is plumbous. Amie is cuddly. Amie is overlying. Amie is matched. Young things are plumbous. If something is plumbous and cuddly then it is jubilant. Cold, overlying things are smiling. If something is matched then it is smiling. Cold, cuddly things are overlying. If Jemimah is phagocytic then Jemimah is matched. Jemimah is jubilant.", "logic": "\nCuddly(jemimah)\nSmiling(jemimah)\nPhagocytic(jemimah)\nJubilant(ajay)\nCuddly(ajay)\nOverlying(ajay)\nSmiling(ajay)\nMatched(ajay)\nPlumbous(amie)\nCuddly(amie)\nOverlying(amie)\nMatched(amie)\nforall x (Matched(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Plumbous(x) and Cuddly(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) and Overlying(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Matched(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) and Cuddly(x) -> Overlying(x))\nPhagocytic(jemimah) -> Matched(jemimah)\n\nJubilant(jemimah)\n\nPhagocytic(jemimah) and Phagocytic(jemimah) -> Matched(jemimah) -> therefore Matched(jemimah) Matched(jemimah) and forall x (Matched(x) -> Plumbous(x)) -> therefore Plumbous(jemimah) Plumbous(jemimah) and Cuddly(jemimah) and forall x (Plumbous(x) and Cuddly(x) -> Jubilant(x)) -> therefore Jubilant(jemimah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Glenn is luxe. Glenn is umbilical. Glenn is audible. Harli is engraved. Harli is luxe. Harli is skanky. Harli is umbilical. Harli is orangish. Yovonnda is subocean. Yovonnda is luxe. Yovonnda is skanky. Yovonnda is orangish. Young things are subocean. If something is subocean and luxe then it is engraved. Cold, skanky things are umbilical. If something is orangish then it is umbilical. Cold, luxe things are skanky. If Glenn is audible then Glenn is orangish. Glenn is not engraved.", "logic": "\nLuxe(glenn)\nUmbilical(glenn)\nAudible(glenn)\nEngraved(harli)\nLuxe(harli)\nSkanky(harli)\nUmbilical(harli)\nOrangish(harli)\nSubocean(yovonnda)\nLuxe(yovonnda)\nSkanky(yovonnda)\nOrangish(yovonnda)\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Subocean(x))\nforall x (Subocean(x) and Luxe(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) and Skanky(x) -> Umbilical(x))\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Umbilical(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) and Luxe(x) -> Skanky(x))\nAudible(glenn) -> Orangish(glenn)\n\nnot Engraved(glenn)\n\nAudible(glenn) and Audible(glenn) -> Orangish(glenn) -> therefore Orangish(glenn) Orangish(glenn) and forall x (Orangish(x) -> Subocean(x)) -> therefore Subocean(glenn) Subocean(glenn) and Luxe(glenn) and forall x (Subocean(x) and Luxe(x) -> Engraved(x)) -> therefore Engraved(glenn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Lula is occlusive. Lula is mannered. Lula is encumbered. Charis is suntanned. Charis is occlusive. Charis is witless. Charis is mannered. Charis is drunk. Kaleena is ungathered. Kaleena is occlusive. Kaleena is witless. Kaleena is drunk. Young things are ungathered. If something is ungathered and occlusive then it is suntanned. Cold, witless things are mannered. If something is drunk then it is mannered. Cold, occlusive things are witless. If Lula is encumbered then Lula is drunk. Kaleena is not encumbered.", "logic": "\nOcclusive(lula)\nMannered(lula)\nEncumbered(lula)\nSuntanned(charis)\nOcclusive(charis)\nWitless(charis)\nMannered(charis)\nDrunk(charis)\nUngathered(kaleena)\nOcclusive(kaleena)\nWitless(kaleena)\nDrunk(kaleena)\nforall x (Drunk(x) -> Ungathered(x))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) and Occlusive(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) and Witless(x) -> Mannered(x))\nforall x (Drunk(x) -> Mannered(x))\nforall x (Suntanned(x) and Occlusive(x) -> Witless(x))\nEncumbered(lula) -> Drunk(lula)\n\nnot Encumbered(kaleena)\n\nnot Encumbered(kaleena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Marshall is blameable. Marshall is crinkled. Marshall is flippant. Nertie is steepish. Nertie is blameable. Nertie is inexplicit. Nertie is crinkled. Nertie is septicemic. Wang is romance. Wang is blameable. Wang is inexplicit. Wang is septicemic. Young things are romance. If something is romance and blameable then it is steepish. Cold, inexplicit things are crinkled. If something is septicemic then it is crinkled. Cold, blameable things are inexplicit. If Marshall is flippant then Marshall is septicemic. Nertie is flippant.", "logic": "\nBlameable(marshall)\nCrinkled(marshall)\nFlippant(marshall)\nSteepish(nertie)\nBlameable(nertie)\nInexplicit(nertie)\nCrinkled(nertie)\nSepticemic(nertie)\nRomance(wang)\nBlameable(wang)\nInexplicit(wang)\nSepticemic(wang)\nforall x (Septicemic(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) and Blameable(x) -> Steepish(x))\nforall x (Steepish(x) and Inexplicit(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Steepish(x) and Blameable(x) -> Inexplicit(x))\nFlippant(marshall) -> Septicemic(marshall)\n\nFlippant(nertie)\n\nFlippant(nertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Lucia is unhealthy. Noemi is umptieth. Katherina is stupid. If something is unhealthy then it is biotypic. All fatalist things are steadfast. Green things are fatalist. Noemi is umptieth.", "logic": "\nUnhealthy(lucia)\nUmptieth(noemi)\nStupid(katherina)\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Biotypic(x))\nforall x (Fatalist(x) -> Steadfast(x))\nforall x (Biotypic(x) -> Fatalist(x))\n\nUmptieth(noemi)\n\ntherefore Umptieth(noemi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Sapphire is ravishing. Garret is consumable. Fleur is perfect. If something is ravishing then it is uninitiate. All tidal things are botchy. Green things are tidal. Fleur is not perfect.", "logic": "\nRavishing(sapphire)\nConsumable(garret)\nPerfect(fleur)\nforall x (Ravishing(x) -> Uninitiate(x))\nforall x (Tidal(x) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Tidal(x))\n\nnot Perfect(fleur)\n\ntherefore Perfect(fleur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Rubetta is eurasiatic. Peyter is cosmologic. Merlin is longish. If something is eurasiatic then it is sicilian. All nether things are saintly. Green things are nether. Rubetta is sicilian.", "logic": "\nEurasiatic(rubetta)\nCosmologic(peyter)\nLongish(merlin)\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) -> Sicilian(x))\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Sicilian(x) -> Nether(x))\n\nSicilian(rubetta)\n\nEurasiatic(rubetta) and forall x (Eurasiatic(x) -> Sicilian(x)) -> therefore Sicilian(rubetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Berri is seductive. Hewe is manic. Julienne is lecherous. If something is seductive then it is nary. All drab things are swift. Green things are drab. Berri is not nary.", "logic": "\nSeductive(berri)\nManic(hewe)\nLecherous(julienne)\nforall x (Seductive(x) -> Nary(x))\nforall x (Drab(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Nary(x) -> Drab(x))\n\nnot Nary(berri)\n\nSeductive(berri) and forall x (Seductive(x) -> Nary(x)) -> therefore Nary(berri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Muffin is microbic. Reggi is swaybacked. Odetta is downhill. If something is microbic then it is techy. All horrid things are biyearly. Green things are horrid. Muffin is horrid.", "logic": "\nMicrobic(muffin)\nSwaybacked(reggi)\nDownhill(odetta)\nforall x (Microbic(x) -> Techy(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nforall x (Techy(x) -> Horrid(x))\n\nHorrid(muffin)\n\nMicrobic(muffin) and forall x (Microbic(x) -> Techy(x)) -> therefore Techy(muffin) Techy(muffin) and forall x (Techy(x) -> Horrid(x)) -> therefore Horrid(muffin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Carine is widespread. Lazare is heavenward. Raphael is queenlike. If something is widespread then it is aneuploid. All unpointed things are skyward. Green things are unpointed. Carine is not unpointed.", "logic": "\nWidespread(carine)\nHeavenward(lazare)\nQueenlike(raphael)\nforall x (Widespread(x) -> Aneuploid(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Skyward(x))\nforall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Unpointed(x))\n\nnot Unpointed(carine)\n\nWidespread(carine) and forall x (Widespread(x) -> Aneuploid(x)) -> therefore Aneuploid(carine) Aneuploid(carine) and forall x (Aneuploid(x) -> Unpointed(x)) -> therefore Unpointed(carine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Georgy is subtle. Nissie is priestly. Bobbette is elfin. If something is subtle then it is unexplored. All unexampled things are cursory. Green things are unexampled. Georgy is cursory.", "logic": "\nSubtle(georgy)\nPriestly(nissie)\nElfin(bobbette)\nforall x (Subtle(x) -> Unexplored(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Unexampled(x))\n\nCursory(georgy)\n\nSubtle(georgy) and forall x (Subtle(x) -> Unexplored(x)) -> therefore Unexplored(georgy) Unexplored(georgy) and forall x (Unexplored(x) -> Unexampled(x)) -> therefore Unexampled(georgy) Unexampled(georgy) and forall x (Unexampled(x) -> Cursory(x)) -> therefore Cursory(georgy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Farica is inverted. Neron is sinuous. Candide is honeylike. If something is inverted then it is iridaceous. All vaned things are asteroidal. Green things are vaned. Farica is not asteroidal.", "logic": "\nInverted(farica)\nSinuous(neron)\nHoneylike(candide)\nforall x (Inverted(x) -> Iridaceous(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Vaned(x))\n\nnot Asteroidal(farica)\n\nInverted(farica) and forall x (Inverted(x) -> Iridaceous(x)) -> therefore Iridaceous(farica) Iridaceous(farica) and forall x (Iridaceous(x) -> Vaned(x)) -> therefore Vaned(farica) Vaned(farica) and forall x (Vaned(x) -> Asteroidal(x)) -> therefore Asteroidal(farica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Tomas is affirmable. Allissa is cuticular. Erny is fawning. If something is affirmable then it is inmost. All phyllodial things are breakable. Green things are phyllodial. Erny is not phyllodial.", "logic": "\nAffirmable(tomas)\nCuticular(allissa)\nFawning(erny)\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Inmost(x))\nforall x (Phyllodial(x) -> Breakable(x))\nforall x (Inmost(x) -> Phyllodial(x))\n\nnot Phyllodial(erny)\n\nforall x (Inmost(x) -> Phyllodial(x)) <- forall x (Affirmable(x) -> Inmost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Dasya is leibnizian. Jimbo is piggish. Mathilde is nativist. If something is leibnizian then it is slopped. All unprompted things are dogged. Green things are unprompted. Mathilde is dogged.", "logic": "\nLeibnizian(dasya)\nPiggish(jimbo)\nNativist(mathilde)\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) -> Slopped(x))\nforall x (Unprompted(x) -> Dogged(x))\nforall x (Slopped(x) -> Unprompted(x))\n\nDogged(mathilde)\n\nforall x (Unprompted(x) -> Dogged(x)) <- forall x (Slopped(x) -> Unprompted(x)) <- forall x (Leibnizian(x) -> Slopped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Friedrich is reddish. Chiarra is vitrified. Kissie is realised. If something is reddish then it is heritable. All noticed things are chargeable. Green things are noticed. Chiarra is not chargeable.", "logic": "\nReddish(friedrich)\nVitrified(chiarra)\nRealised(kissie)\nforall x (Reddish(x) -> Heritable(x))\nforall x (Noticed(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Heritable(x) -> Noticed(x))\n\nnot Chargeable(chiarra)\n\nforall x (Noticed(x) -> Chargeable(x)) <- forall x (Heritable(x) -> Noticed(x)) <- forall x (Reddish(x) -> Heritable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Griffin is mucinous. Curtice is strung. Karissa is usurious. If something is mucinous then it is bilabiate. All nighted things are imposing. Green things are nighted. Curtice is bilabiate.", "logic": "\nMucinous(griffin)\nStrung(curtice)\nUsurious(karissa)\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Nighted(x) -> Imposing(x))\nforall x (Bilabiate(x) -> Nighted(x))\n\nBilabiate(curtice)\n\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Bilabiate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Luther is medical. Jenine is iron. Karee is toeless. If something is medical then it is clawlike. All unlovable things are juridical. Green things are unlovable. Jenine is not furry.", "logic": "\nMedical(luther)\nIron(jenine)\nToeless(karee)\nforall x (Medical(x) -> Clawlike(x))\nforall x (Unlovable(x) -> Juridical(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) -> Unlovable(x))\n\nnot Furry(jenine)\n\nnot Furry(jenine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Marcus is aligned. Bobine is wizard. Cobby is cursorial. If something is aligned then it is absorbable. All anestrous things are virucidal. Green things are anestrous. Cobby is aligned.", "logic": "\nAligned(marcus)\nWizard(bobine)\nCursorial(cobby)\nforall x (Aligned(x) -> Absorbable(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> Virucidal(x))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Anestrous(x))\n\nAligned(cobby)\n\nAligned(cobby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Humphrey is vivacious. Rani is vexed. Nicolina is excrescent. If something is vivacious then it is unoccupied. All unworldly things are starchy. Green things are unworldly. Humphrey is not vexed.", "logic": "\nVivacious(humphrey)\nVexed(rani)\nExcrescent(nicolina)\nforall x (Vivacious(x) -> Unoccupied(x))\nforall x (Unworldly(x) -> Starchy(x))\nforall x (Unoccupied(x) -> Unworldly(x))\n\nnot Vexed(humphrey)\n\nnot Vexed(humphrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "Sampson is mohammedan. Erhart is foggy. Silvio is epenthetic. If something is mohammedan then it is preserved. All insane things are disparate. Green things are insane. Erhart is epenthetic.", "logic": "\nMohammedan(sampson)\nFoggy(erhart)\nEpenthetic(silvio)\nforall x (Mohammedan(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Insane(x) -> Disparate(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Insane(x))\n\nEpenthetic(erhart)\n\nEpenthetic(erhart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1349"} {"premises": "The timmy relyric the salomone. The timmy is annular. The timmy is not hardbound. The timmy is cleanly. The timmy does not like the waylan. The timmy unscrew the salomone. The rodolfo relyric the waylan. The rodolfo is annular. The rodolfo marshal the waylan. The waylan is alpine. The waylan is cleanly. The waylan unscrew the salomone. The waylan marshal the salomone. The salomone does not eat the rodolfo. The salomone unscrew the rodolfo. If something marshal the rodolfo then it is hardbound. If something relyric the timmy then the timmy relyric the rodolfo. If something is oozy then it does not like the salomone. If something unscrew the timmy and it does not eat the waylan then the waylan unscrew the timmy. If something relyric the timmy then it is alpine. If something marshal the timmy then it is not annular. If something relyric the rodolfo and it is not hardbound then the rodolfo marshal the salomone. If something marshal the salomone then the salomone marshal the timmy. The timmy unscrew the salomone.", "logic": "\nRelyric(timmy, salomone)\nAnnular(timmy)\nnot Hardbound(timmy)\nCleanly(timmy)\nnot Unscrew(timmy, waylan)\nUnscrew(timmy, salomone)\nRelyric(rodolfo, waylan)\nAnnular(rodolfo)\nMarshal(rodolfo, waylan)\nAlpine(waylan)\nCleanly(waylan)\nUnscrew(waylan, salomone)\nMarshal(waylan, salomone)\nnot Relyric(salomone, rodolfo)\nUnscrew(salomone, rodolfo)\nforall x (Marshal(x, rodolfo) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Relyric(x, timmy) -> Relyric(timmy, rodolfo))\nforall x (Oozy(x) -> not Unscrew(x, salomone))\nforall x (Unscrew(x, timmy) and not Relyric(x, waylan) -> Unscrew(waylan, timmy))\nforall x (Relyric(x, timmy) -> Alpine(x))\nforall x (Marshal(x, timmy) -> not Annular(x))\nforall x (Relyric(x, rodolfo) and not Hardbound(x) -> Marshal(rodolfo, salomone))\nforall x (Marshal(x, salomone) -> Marshal(salomone, timmy))\n\nUnscrew(timmy, salomone)\n\ntherefore Unscrew(timmy, salomone)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The roslyn overcome the torrance. The roslyn is easygoing. The roslyn is not done. The roslyn is articulate. The roslyn does not like the leisha. The roslyn pull the torrance. The joshua overcome the leisha. The joshua is easygoing. The joshua catalyse the leisha. The leisha is clouded. The leisha is articulate. The leisha pull the torrance. The leisha catalyse the torrance. The torrance does not eat the joshua. The torrance pull the joshua. If something catalyse the joshua then it is done. If something overcome the roslyn then the roslyn overcome the joshua. If something is dreamed then it does not like the torrance. If something pull the roslyn and it does not eat the leisha then the leisha pull the roslyn. If something overcome the roslyn then it is clouded. If something catalyse the roslyn then it is not easygoing. If something overcome the joshua and it is not done then the joshua catalyse the torrance. If something catalyse the torrance then the torrance catalyse the roslyn. The roslyn does not eat the torrance.", "logic": "\nOvercome(roslyn, torrance)\nEasygoing(roslyn)\nnot Done(roslyn)\nArticulate(roslyn)\nnot Pull(roslyn, leisha)\nPull(roslyn, torrance)\nOvercome(joshua, leisha)\nEasygoing(joshua)\nCatalyse(joshua, leisha)\nClouded(leisha)\nArticulate(leisha)\nPull(leisha, torrance)\nCatalyse(leisha, torrance)\nnot Overcome(torrance, joshua)\nPull(torrance, joshua)\nforall x (Catalyse(x, joshua) -> Done(x))\nforall x (Overcome(x, roslyn) -> Overcome(roslyn, joshua))\nforall x (Dreamed(x) -> not Pull(x, torrance))\nforall x (Pull(x, roslyn) and not Overcome(x, leisha) -> Pull(leisha, roslyn))\nforall x (Overcome(x, roslyn) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, roslyn) -> not Easygoing(x))\nforall x (Overcome(x, joshua) and not Done(x) -> Catalyse(joshua, torrance))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, torrance) -> Catalyse(torrance, roslyn))\n\nnot Overcome(roslyn, torrance)\n\ntherefore Overcome(roslyn, torrance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The freemon moonlight the sherry. The freemon is bootless. The freemon is not shouted. The freemon is ethereal. The freemon does not like the giuseppe. The freemon gratify the sherry. The dotty moonlight the giuseppe. The dotty is bootless. The dotty terrify the giuseppe. The giuseppe is corrugated. The giuseppe is ethereal. The giuseppe gratify the sherry. The giuseppe terrify the sherry. The sherry does not eat the dotty. The sherry gratify the dotty. If something terrify the dotty then it is shouted. If something moonlight the freemon then the freemon moonlight the dotty. If something is lackluster then it does not like the sherry. If something gratify the freemon and it does not eat the giuseppe then the giuseppe gratify the freemon. If something moonlight the freemon then it is corrugated. If something terrify the freemon then it is not bootless. If something moonlight the dotty and it is not shouted then the dotty terrify the sherry. If something terrify the sherry then the sherry terrify the freemon. The sherry terrify the freemon.", "logic": "\nMoonlight(freemon, sherry)\nBootless(freemon)\nnot Shouted(freemon)\nEthereal(freemon)\nnot Gratify(freemon, giuseppe)\nGratify(freemon, sherry)\nMoonlight(dotty, giuseppe)\nBootless(dotty)\nTerrify(dotty, giuseppe)\nCorrugated(giuseppe)\nEthereal(giuseppe)\nGratify(giuseppe, sherry)\nTerrify(giuseppe, sherry)\nnot Moonlight(sherry, dotty)\nGratify(sherry, dotty)\nforall x (Terrify(x, dotty) -> Shouted(x))\nforall x (Moonlight(x, freemon) -> Moonlight(freemon, dotty))\nforall x (Lackluster(x) -> not Gratify(x, sherry))\nforall x (Gratify(x, freemon) and not Moonlight(x, giuseppe) -> Gratify(giuseppe, freemon))\nforall x (Moonlight(x, freemon) -> Corrugated(x))\nforall x (Terrify(x, freemon) -> not Bootless(x))\nforall x (Moonlight(x, dotty) and not Shouted(x) -> Terrify(dotty, sherry))\nforall x (Terrify(x, sherry) -> Terrify(sherry, freemon))\n\nTerrify(sherry, freemon)\n\nTerrify(giuseppe, sherry) and forall x (Terrify(x, sherry) -> Terrify(sherry, freemon)) -> therefore Terrify(sherry, freemon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The willette insufflate the rochelle. The willette is reusable. The willette is not unfunny. The willette is literal. The willette does not like the kacey. The willette attach the rochelle. The eleonore insufflate the kacey. The eleonore is reusable. The eleonore pressurize the kacey. The kacey is inexpiable. The kacey is literal. The kacey attach the rochelle. The kacey pressurize the rochelle. The rochelle does not eat the eleonore. The rochelle attach the eleonore. If something pressurize the eleonore then it is unfunny. If something insufflate the willette then the willette insufflate the eleonore. If something is ahorseback then it does not like the rochelle. If something attach the willette and it does not eat the kacey then the kacey attach the willette. If something insufflate the willette then it is inexpiable. If something pressurize the willette then it is not reusable. If something insufflate the eleonore and it is not unfunny then the eleonore pressurize the rochelle. If something pressurize the rochelle then the rochelle pressurize the willette. The rochelle does not see the willette.", "logic": "\nInsufflate(willette, rochelle)\nReusable(willette)\nnot Unfunny(willette)\nLiteral(willette)\nnot Attach(willette, kacey)\nAttach(willette, rochelle)\nInsufflate(eleonore, kacey)\nReusable(eleonore)\nPressurize(eleonore, kacey)\nInexpiable(kacey)\nLiteral(kacey)\nAttach(kacey, rochelle)\nPressurize(kacey, rochelle)\nnot Insufflate(rochelle, eleonore)\nAttach(rochelle, eleonore)\nforall x (Pressurize(x, eleonore) -> Unfunny(x))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, willette) -> Insufflate(willette, eleonore))\nforall x (Ahorseback(x) -> not Attach(x, rochelle))\nforall x (Attach(x, willette) and not Insufflate(x, kacey) -> Attach(kacey, willette))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, willette) -> Inexpiable(x))\nforall x (Pressurize(x, willette) -> not Reusable(x))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, eleonore) and not Unfunny(x) -> Pressurize(eleonore, rochelle))\nforall x (Pressurize(x, rochelle) -> Pressurize(rochelle, willette))\n\nnot Pressurize(rochelle, willette)\n\nPressurize(kacey, rochelle) and forall x (Pressurize(x, rochelle) -> Pressurize(rochelle, willette)) -> therefore Pressurize(rochelle, willette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The jimmie syphon the josselyn. The jimmie is ostensive. The jimmie is not center. The jimmie is smoggy. The jimmie does not like the hart. The jimmie sanitise the josselyn. The maryjo syphon the hart. The maryjo is ostensive. The maryjo churr the hart. The hart is mutational. The hart is smoggy. The hart sanitise the josselyn. The hart churr the josselyn. The josselyn does not eat the maryjo. The josselyn sanitise the maryjo. If something churr the maryjo then it is center. If something syphon the jimmie then the jimmie syphon the maryjo. If something is illicit then it does not like the josselyn. If something sanitise the jimmie and it does not eat the hart then the hart sanitise the jimmie. If something syphon the jimmie then it is mutational. If something churr the jimmie then it is not ostensive. If something syphon the maryjo and it is not center then the maryjo churr the josselyn. If something churr the josselyn then the josselyn churr the jimmie. The josselyn is not ostensive.", "logic": "\nSyphon(jimmie, josselyn)\nOstensive(jimmie)\nnot Center(jimmie)\nSmoggy(jimmie)\nnot Sanitise(jimmie, hart)\nSanitise(jimmie, josselyn)\nSyphon(maryjo, hart)\nOstensive(maryjo)\nChurr(maryjo, hart)\nMutational(hart)\nSmoggy(hart)\nSanitise(hart, josselyn)\nChurr(hart, josselyn)\nnot Syphon(josselyn, maryjo)\nSanitise(josselyn, maryjo)\nforall x (Churr(x, maryjo) -> Center(x))\nforall x (Syphon(x, jimmie) -> Syphon(jimmie, maryjo))\nforall x (Illicit(x) -> not Sanitise(x, josselyn))\nforall x (Sanitise(x, jimmie) and not Syphon(x, hart) -> Sanitise(hart, jimmie))\nforall x (Syphon(x, jimmie) -> Mutational(x))\nforall x (Churr(x, jimmie) -> not Ostensive(x))\nforall x (Syphon(x, maryjo) and not Center(x) -> Churr(maryjo, josselyn))\nforall x (Churr(x, josselyn) -> Churr(josselyn, jimmie))\n\nnot Ostensive(josselyn)\n\nChurr(hart, josselyn) and forall x (Churr(x, josselyn) -> Churr(josselyn, jimmie)) -> therefore Churr(josselyn, jimmie) Churr(josselyn, jimmie) and forall x (Churr(x, jimmie) -> not Ostensive(x)) -> therefore not Ostensive(josselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The frederica evade the rycca. The frederica is inclusive. The frederica is not revealing. The frederica is acanthous. The frederica does not like the gabriello. The frederica repatriate the rycca. The tomiko evade the gabriello. The tomiko is inclusive. The tomiko copyread the gabriello. The gabriello is proximate. The gabriello is acanthous. The gabriello repatriate the rycca. The gabriello copyread the rycca. The rycca does not eat the tomiko. The rycca repatriate the tomiko. If something copyread the tomiko then it is revealing. If something evade the frederica then the frederica evade the tomiko. If something is tangerine then it does not like the rycca. If something repatriate the frederica and it does not eat the gabriello then the gabriello repatriate the frederica. If something evade the frederica then it is proximate. If something copyread the frederica then it is not inclusive. If something evade the tomiko and it is not revealing then the tomiko copyread the rycca. If something copyread the rycca then the rycca copyread the frederica. The rycca is inclusive.", "logic": "\nEvade(frederica, rycca)\nInclusive(frederica)\nnot Revealing(frederica)\nAcanthous(frederica)\nnot Repatriate(frederica, gabriello)\nRepatriate(frederica, rycca)\nEvade(tomiko, gabriello)\nInclusive(tomiko)\nCopyread(tomiko, gabriello)\nProximate(gabriello)\nAcanthous(gabriello)\nRepatriate(gabriello, rycca)\nCopyread(gabriello, rycca)\nnot Evade(rycca, tomiko)\nRepatriate(rycca, tomiko)\nforall x (Copyread(x, tomiko) -> Revealing(x))\nforall x (Evade(x, frederica) -> Evade(frederica, tomiko))\nforall x (Tangerine(x) -> not Repatriate(x, rycca))\nforall x (Repatriate(x, frederica) and not Evade(x, gabriello) -> Repatriate(gabriello, frederica))\nforall x (Evade(x, frederica) -> Proximate(x))\nforall x (Copyread(x, frederica) -> not Inclusive(x))\nforall x (Evade(x, tomiko) and not Revealing(x) -> Copyread(tomiko, rycca))\nforall x (Copyread(x, rycca) -> Copyread(rycca, frederica))\n\nInclusive(rycca)\n\nCopyread(gabriello, rycca) and forall x (Copyread(x, rycca) -> Copyread(rycca, frederica)) -> therefore Copyread(rycca, frederica) Copyread(rycca, frederica) and forall x (Copyread(x, frederica) -> not Inclusive(x)) -> therefore not Inclusive(rycca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The elmira fixate the staffard. The elmira is semite. The elmira is not unsaved. The elmira is flush. The elmira does not like the josiah. The elmira defrost the staffard. The brigitta fixate the josiah. The brigitta is semite. The brigitta immunise the josiah. The josiah is forehanded. The josiah is flush. The josiah defrost the staffard. The josiah immunise the staffard. The staffard does not eat the brigitta. The staffard defrost the brigitta. If something immunise the brigitta then it is unsaved. If something fixate the elmira then the elmira fixate the brigitta. If something is centric then it does not like the staffard. If something defrost the elmira and it does not eat the josiah then the josiah defrost the elmira. If something fixate the elmira then it is forehanded. If something immunise the elmira then it is not semite. If something fixate the brigitta and it is not unsaved then the brigitta immunise the staffard. If something immunise the staffard then the staffard immunise the elmira. The josiah is not unsaved.", "logic": "\nFixate(elmira, staffard)\nSemite(elmira)\nnot Unsaved(elmira)\nFlush(elmira)\nnot Defrost(elmira, josiah)\nDefrost(elmira, staffard)\nFixate(brigitta, josiah)\nSemite(brigitta)\nImmunise(brigitta, josiah)\nForehanded(josiah)\nFlush(josiah)\nDefrost(josiah, staffard)\nImmunise(josiah, staffard)\nnot Fixate(staffard, brigitta)\nDefrost(staffard, brigitta)\nforall x (Immunise(x, brigitta) -> Unsaved(x))\nforall x (Fixate(x, elmira) -> Fixate(elmira, brigitta))\nforall x (Centric(x) -> not Defrost(x, staffard))\nforall x (Defrost(x, elmira) and not Fixate(x, josiah) -> Defrost(josiah, elmira))\nforall x (Fixate(x, elmira) -> Forehanded(x))\nforall x (Immunise(x, elmira) -> not Semite(x))\nforall x (Fixate(x, brigitta) and not Unsaved(x) -> Immunise(brigitta, staffard))\nforall x (Immunise(x, staffard) -> Immunise(staffard, elmira))\n\nnot Unsaved(josiah)\n\nforall x (Immunise(x, brigitta) -> Unsaved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The niles outdo the libbey. The niles is written. The niles is not sphingine. The niles is rustproof. The niles does not like the max. The niles uphold the libbey. The claresta outdo the max. The claresta is written. The claresta interpret the max. The max is phony. The max is rustproof. The max uphold the libbey. The max interpret the libbey. The libbey does not eat the claresta. The libbey uphold the claresta. If something interpret the claresta then it is sphingine. If something outdo the niles then the niles outdo the claresta. If something is suitable then it does not like the libbey. If something uphold the niles and it does not eat the max then the max uphold the niles. If something outdo the niles then it is phony. If something interpret the niles then it is not written. If something outdo the claresta and it is not sphingine then the claresta interpret the libbey. If something interpret the libbey then the libbey interpret the niles. The libbey is sphingine.", "logic": "\nOutdo(niles, libbey)\nWritten(niles)\nnot Sphingine(niles)\nRustproof(niles)\nnot Uphold(niles, max)\nUphold(niles, libbey)\nOutdo(claresta, max)\nWritten(claresta)\nInterpret(claresta, max)\nPhony(max)\nRustproof(max)\nUphold(max, libbey)\nInterpret(max, libbey)\nnot Outdo(libbey, claresta)\nUphold(libbey, claresta)\nforall x (Interpret(x, claresta) -> Sphingine(x))\nforall x (Outdo(x, niles) -> Outdo(niles, claresta))\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> not Uphold(x, libbey))\nforall x (Uphold(x, niles) and not Outdo(x, max) -> Uphold(max, niles))\nforall x (Outdo(x, niles) -> Phony(x))\nforall x (Interpret(x, niles) -> not Written(x))\nforall x (Outdo(x, claresta) and not Sphingine(x) -> Interpret(claresta, libbey))\nforall x (Interpret(x, libbey) -> Interpret(libbey, niles))\n\nSphingine(libbey)\n\nforall x (Interpret(x, claresta) -> Sphingine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The bentley patrol the maryl. The bentley is coalesced. The bentley is not astrocytic. The bentley is summery. The bentley does not like the norah. The bentley gong the maryl. The oralia patrol the norah. The oralia is coalesced. The oralia repel the norah. The norah is senecan. The norah is summery. The norah gong the maryl. The norah repel the maryl. The maryl does not eat the oralia. The maryl gong the oralia. If something repel the oralia then it is astrocytic. If something patrol the bentley then the bentley patrol the oralia. If something is detersive then it does not like the maryl. If something gong the bentley and it does not eat the norah then the norah gong the bentley. If something patrol the bentley then it is senecan. If something repel the bentley then it is not coalesced. If something patrol the oralia and it is not astrocytic then the oralia repel the maryl. If something repel the maryl then the maryl repel the bentley. The oralia is not astrocytic.", "logic": "\nPatrol(bentley, maryl)\nCoalesced(bentley)\nnot Astrocytic(bentley)\nSummery(bentley)\nnot Gong(bentley, norah)\nGong(bentley, maryl)\nPatrol(oralia, norah)\nCoalesced(oralia)\nRepel(oralia, norah)\nSenecan(norah)\nSummery(norah)\nGong(norah, maryl)\nRepel(norah, maryl)\nnot Patrol(maryl, oralia)\nGong(maryl, oralia)\nforall x (Repel(x, oralia) -> Astrocytic(x))\nforall x (Patrol(x, bentley) -> Patrol(bentley, oralia))\nforall x (Detersive(x) -> not Gong(x, maryl))\nforall x (Gong(x, bentley) and not Patrol(x, norah) -> Gong(norah, bentley))\nforall x (Patrol(x, bentley) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Repel(x, bentley) -> not Coalesced(x))\nforall x (Patrol(x, oralia) and not Astrocytic(x) -> Repel(oralia, maryl))\nforall x (Repel(x, maryl) -> Repel(maryl, bentley))\n\nnot Astrocytic(oralia)\n\nforall x (Repel(x, oralia) -> Astrocytic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The davis incase the kendall. The davis is beefy. The davis is not scandalous. The davis is monoclinal. The davis does not like the robert. The davis debauch the kendall. The margarete incase the robert. The margarete is beefy. The margarete undergrow the robert. The robert is tuxedoed. The robert is monoclinal. The robert debauch the kendall. The robert undergrow the kendall. The kendall does not eat the margarete. The kendall debauch the margarete. If something undergrow the margarete then it is scandalous. If something incase the davis then the davis incase the margarete. If something is snazzy then it does not like the kendall. If something debauch the davis and it does not eat the robert then the robert debauch the davis. If something incase the davis then it is tuxedoed. If something undergrow the davis then it is not beefy. If something incase the margarete and it is not scandalous then the margarete undergrow the kendall. If something undergrow the kendall then the kendall undergrow the davis. The kendall is monoclinal.", "logic": "\nIncase(davis, kendall)\nBeefy(davis)\nnot Scandalous(davis)\nMonoclinal(davis)\nnot Debauch(davis, robert)\nDebauch(davis, kendall)\nIncase(margarete, robert)\nBeefy(margarete)\nUndergrow(margarete, robert)\nTuxedoed(robert)\nMonoclinal(robert)\nDebauch(robert, kendall)\nUndergrow(robert, kendall)\nnot Incase(kendall, margarete)\nDebauch(kendall, margarete)\nforall x (Undergrow(x, margarete) -> Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Incase(x, davis) -> Incase(davis, margarete))\nforall x (Snazzy(x) -> not Debauch(x, kendall))\nforall x (Debauch(x, davis) and not Incase(x, robert) -> Debauch(robert, davis))\nforall x (Incase(x, davis) -> Tuxedoed(x))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, davis) -> not Beefy(x))\nforall x (Incase(x, margarete) and not Scandalous(x) -> Undergrow(margarete, kendall))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, kendall) -> Undergrow(kendall, davis))\n\nMonoclinal(kendall)\n\nMonoclinal(kendall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The kinna fellate the diamond. The kinna is veined. The kinna is not slothful. The kinna is possible. The kinna does not like the amelie. The kinna pump the diamond. The wilden fellate the amelie. The wilden is veined. The wilden unclog the amelie. The amelie is tsarist. The amelie is possible. The amelie pump the diamond. The amelie unclog the diamond. The diamond does not eat the wilden. The diamond pump the wilden. If something unclog the wilden then it is slothful. If something fellate the kinna then the kinna fellate the wilden. If something is donnean then it does not like the diamond. If something pump the kinna and it does not eat the amelie then the amelie pump the kinna. If something fellate the kinna then it is tsarist. If something unclog the kinna then it is not veined. If something fellate the wilden and it is not slothful then the wilden unclog the diamond. If something unclog the diamond then the diamond unclog the kinna. The kinna does not like the wilden.", "logic": "\nFellate(kinna, diamond)\nVeined(kinna)\nnot Slothful(kinna)\nPossible(kinna)\nnot Pump(kinna, amelie)\nPump(kinna, diamond)\nFellate(wilden, amelie)\nVeined(wilden)\nUnclog(wilden, amelie)\nTsarist(amelie)\nPossible(amelie)\nPump(amelie, diamond)\nUnclog(amelie, diamond)\nnot Fellate(diamond, wilden)\nPump(diamond, wilden)\nforall x (Unclog(x, wilden) -> Slothful(x))\nforall x (Fellate(x, kinna) -> Fellate(kinna, wilden))\nforall x (Donnean(x) -> not Pump(x, diamond))\nforall x (Pump(x, kinna) and not Fellate(x, amelie) -> Pump(amelie, kinna))\nforall x (Fellate(x, kinna) -> Tsarist(x))\nforall x (Unclog(x, kinna) -> not Veined(x))\nforall x (Fellate(x, wilden) and not Slothful(x) -> Unclog(wilden, diamond))\nforall x (Unclog(x, diamond) -> Unclog(diamond, kinna))\n\nnot Pump(kinna, wilden)\n\nnot Pump(kinna, wilden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The barbie accede the mikey. The barbie is catalan. The barbie is not hempen. The barbie is hymenal. The barbie does not like the amadeus. The barbie cockle the mikey. The sindee accede the amadeus. The sindee is catalan. The sindee flit the amadeus. The amadeus is duple. The amadeus is hymenal. The amadeus cockle the mikey. The amadeus flit the mikey. The mikey does not eat the sindee. The mikey cockle the sindee. If something flit the sindee then it is hempen. If something accede the barbie then the barbie accede the sindee. If something is antitypic then it does not like the mikey. If something cockle the barbie and it does not eat the amadeus then the amadeus cockle the barbie. If something accede the barbie then it is duple. If something flit the barbie then it is not catalan. If something accede the sindee and it is not hempen then the sindee flit the mikey. If something flit the mikey then the mikey flit the barbie. The amadeus accede the mikey.", "logic": "\nAccede(barbie, mikey)\nCatalan(barbie)\nnot Hempen(barbie)\nHymenal(barbie)\nnot Cockle(barbie, amadeus)\nCockle(barbie, mikey)\nAccede(sindee, amadeus)\nCatalan(sindee)\nFlit(sindee, amadeus)\nDuple(amadeus)\nHymenal(amadeus)\nCockle(amadeus, mikey)\nFlit(amadeus, mikey)\nnot Accede(mikey, sindee)\nCockle(mikey, sindee)\nforall x (Flit(x, sindee) -> Hempen(x))\nforall x (Accede(x, barbie) -> Accede(barbie, sindee))\nforall x (Antitypic(x) -> not Cockle(x, mikey))\nforall x (Cockle(x, barbie) and not Accede(x, amadeus) -> Cockle(amadeus, barbie))\nforall x (Accede(x, barbie) -> Duple(x))\nforall x (Flit(x, barbie) -> not Catalan(x))\nforall x (Accede(x, sindee) and not Hempen(x) -> Flit(sindee, mikey))\nforall x (Flit(x, mikey) -> Flit(mikey, barbie))\n\nAccede(amadeus, mikey)\n\nAccede(amadeus, mikey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-778"} {"premises": "The zora divaricate the ivonne. The sondra is jewelled. The ivonne secularise the zora. If something is rapt then it divaricate the ivonne. If the sondra politick the ivonne and the ivonne divaricate the zora then the sondra secularise the zora. If something secularise the zora then the zora does not visit the sondra. If something is zenithal then it is rapt. If something secularise the ivonne and the ivonne secularise the zora then the ivonne does not see the zora. If something secularise the zora and the zora does not visit the sondra then it secularise the ivonne. The zora divaricate the ivonne.", "logic": "\nDivaricate(zora, ivonne)\nJewelled(sondra)\nSecularise(ivonne, zora)\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Divaricate(x, ivonne))\nPolitick(sondra, ivonne) and Divaricate(ivonne, zora) -> Secularise(sondra, zora)\nforall x (Secularise(x, zora) -> not Secularise(zora, sondra))\nforall x (Zenithal(x) -> Rapt(x))\nforall x (Secularise(x, ivonne) and Secularise(ivonne, zora) -> not Politick(ivonne, zora))\nforall x (Secularise(x, zora) and not Secularise(zora, sondra) -> Secularise(x, ivonne))\n\nDivaricate(zora, ivonne)\n\ntherefore Divaricate(zora, ivonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The sheela deaminize the kim. The harrold is manichee. The kim dishonour the sheela. If something is nourishing then it deaminize the kim. If the harrold educate the kim and the kim deaminize the sheela then the harrold dishonour the sheela. If something dishonour the sheela then the sheela does not visit the harrold. If something is drumhead then it is nourishing. If something dishonour the kim and the kim dishonour the sheela then the kim does not see the sheela. If something dishonour the sheela and the sheela does not visit the harrold then it dishonour the kim. The harrold is not manichee.", "logic": "\nDeaminize(sheela, kim)\nManichee(harrold)\nDishonour(kim, sheela)\nforall x (Nourishing(x) -> Deaminize(x, kim))\nEducate(harrold, kim) and Deaminize(kim, sheela) -> Dishonour(harrold, sheela)\nforall x (Dishonour(x, sheela) -> not Dishonour(sheela, harrold))\nforall x (Drumhead(x) -> Nourishing(x))\nforall x (Dishonour(x, kim) and Dishonour(kim, sheela) -> not Educate(kim, sheela))\nforall x (Dishonour(x, sheela) and not Dishonour(sheela, harrold) -> Dishonour(x, kim))\n\nnot Manichee(harrold)\n\ntherefore Manichee(harrold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The roseann autotomise the lorelle. The leonanie is weepy. The lorelle harshen the roseann. If something is jocose then it autotomise the lorelle. If the leonanie egest the lorelle and the lorelle autotomise the roseann then the leonanie harshen the roseann. If something harshen the roseann then the roseann does not visit the leonanie. If something is blameless then it is jocose. If something harshen the lorelle and the lorelle harshen the roseann then the lorelle does not see the roseann. If something harshen the roseann and the roseann does not visit the leonanie then it harshen the lorelle. The roseann does not visit the leonanie.", "logic": "\nAutotomise(roseann, lorelle)\nWeepy(leonanie)\nHarshen(lorelle, roseann)\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Autotomise(x, lorelle))\nEgest(leonanie, lorelle) and Autotomise(lorelle, roseann) -> Harshen(leonanie, roseann)\nforall x (Harshen(x, roseann) -> not Harshen(roseann, leonanie))\nforall x (Blameless(x) -> Jocose(x))\nforall x (Harshen(x, lorelle) and Harshen(lorelle, roseann) -> not Egest(lorelle, roseann))\nforall x (Harshen(x, roseann) and not Harshen(roseann, leonanie) -> Harshen(x, lorelle))\n\nnot Harshen(roseann, leonanie)\n\nHarshen(lorelle, roseann) and forall x (Harshen(x, roseann) -> not Harshen(roseann, leonanie)) -> therefore not Harshen(roseann, leonanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The junie irrupt the avrom. The derrek is radial. The avrom ionize the junie. If something is void then it irrupt the avrom. If the derrek vociferate the avrom and the avrom irrupt the junie then the derrek ionize the junie. If something ionize the junie then the junie does not visit the derrek. If something is tangible then it is void. If something ionize the avrom and the avrom ionize the junie then the avrom does not see the junie. If something ionize the junie and the junie does not visit the derrek then it ionize the avrom. The junie ionize the derrek.", "logic": "\nIrrupt(junie, avrom)\nRadial(derrek)\nIonize(avrom, junie)\nforall x (Void(x) -> Irrupt(x, avrom))\nVociferate(derrek, avrom) and Irrupt(avrom, junie) -> Ionize(derrek, junie)\nforall x (Ionize(x, junie) -> not Ionize(junie, derrek))\nforall x (Tangible(x) -> Void(x))\nforall x (Ionize(x, avrom) and Ionize(avrom, junie) -> not Vociferate(avrom, junie))\nforall x (Ionize(x, junie) and not Ionize(junie, derrek) -> Ionize(x, avrom))\n\nIonize(junie, derrek)\n\nIonize(avrom, junie) and forall x (Ionize(x, junie) -> not Ionize(junie, derrek)) -> therefore not Ionize(junie, derrek)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The beatriz initial the vaclav. The minna is fretful. The vaclav command the beatriz. If something is showy then it initial the vaclav. If the minna misplay the vaclav and the vaclav initial the beatriz then the minna command the beatriz. If something command the beatriz then the beatriz does not visit the minna. If something is pretty then it is showy. If something command the vaclav and the vaclav command the beatriz then the vaclav does not see the beatriz. If something command the beatriz and the beatriz does not visit the minna then it command the vaclav. The vaclav command the vaclav.", "logic": "\nInitial(beatriz, vaclav)\nFretful(minna)\nCommand(vaclav, beatriz)\nforall x (Showy(x) -> Initial(x, vaclav))\nMisplay(minna, vaclav) and Initial(vaclav, beatriz) -> Command(minna, beatriz)\nforall x (Command(x, beatriz) -> not Command(beatriz, minna))\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Showy(x))\nforall x (Command(x, vaclav) and Command(vaclav, beatriz) -> not Misplay(vaclav, beatriz))\nforall x (Command(x, beatriz) and not Command(beatriz, minna) -> Command(x, vaclav))\n\nCommand(vaclav, vaclav)\n\nCommand(vaclav, beatriz) and forall x (Command(x, beatriz) -> not Command(beatriz, minna)) -> therefore not Command(beatriz, minna) Command(vaclav, beatriz) and not Command(beatriz, minna) and forall x (Command(x, beatriz) and not Command(beatriz, minna) -> Command(x, vaclav)) -> therefore Command(vaclav, vaclav)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The orlando misguide the ainsley. The sharlene is addible. The ainsley scent the orlando. If something is unsmiling then it misguide the ainsley. If the sharlene gladden the ainsley and the ainsley misguide the orlando then the sharlene scent the orlando. If something scent the orlando then the orlando does not visit the sharlene. If something is handsewn then it is unsmiling. If something scent the ainsley and the ainsley scent the orlando then the ainsley does not see the orlando. If something scent the orlando and the orlando does not visit the sharlene then it scent the ainsley. The ainsley does not visit the ainsley.", "logic": "\nMisguide(orlando, ainsley)\nAddible(sharlene)\nScent(ainsley, orlando)\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) -> Misguide(x, ainsley))\nGladden(sharlene, ainsley) and Misguide(ainsley, orlando) -> Scent(sharlene, orlando)\nforall x (Scent(x, orlando) -> not Scent(orlando, sharlene))\nforall x (Handsewn(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Scent(x, ainsley) and Scent(ainsley, orlando) -> not Gladden(ainsley, orlando))\nforall x (Scent(x, orlando) and not Scent(orlando, sharlene) -> Scent(x, ainsley))\n\nnot Scent(ainsley, ainsley)\n\nScent(ainsley, orlando) and forall x (Scent(x, orlando) -> not Scent(orlando, sharlene)) -> therefore not Scent(orlando, sharlene) Scent(ainsley, orlando) and not Scent(orlando, sharlene) and forall x (Scent(x, orlando) and not Scent(orlando, sharlene) -> Scent(x, ainsley)) -> therefore Scent(ainsley, ainsley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The tamera steer the davina. The french is conserved. The davina sizzle the tamera. If something is squiggly then it steer the davina. If the french whoosh the davina and the davina steer the tamera then the french sizzle the tamera. If something sizzle the tamera then the tamera does not visit the french. If something is plural then it is squiggly. If something sizzle the davina and the davina sizzle the tamera then the davina does not see the tamera. If something sizzle the tamera and the tamera does not visit the french then it sizzle the davina. The davina does not see the tamera.", "logic": "\nSteer(tamera, davina)\nConserved(french)\nSizzle(davina, tamera)\nforall x (Squiggly(x) -> Steer(x, davina))\nWhoosh(french, davina) and Steer(davina, tamera) -> Sizzle(french, tamera)\nforall x (Sizzle(x, tamera) -> not Sizzle(tamera, french))\nforall x (Plural(x) -> Squiggly(x))\nforall x (Sizzle(x, davina) and Sizzle(davina, tamera) -> not Whoosh(davina, tamera))\nforall x (Sizzle(x, tamera) and not Sizzle(tamera, french) -> Sizzle(x, davina))\n\nnot Whoosh(davina, tamera)\n\nSizzle(davina, tamera) and forall x (Sizzle(x, tamera) -> not Sizzle(tamera, french)) -> therefore not Sizzle(tamera, french) Sizzle(davina, tamera) and not Sizzle(tamera, french) and forall x (Sizzle(x, tamera) and not Sizzle(tamera, french) -> Sizzle(x, davina)) -> therefore Sizzle(davina, davina) Sizzle(davina, davina) and Sizzle(davina, tamera) and forall x (Sizzle(x, davina) and Sizzle(davina, tamera) -> not Whoosh(davina, tamera)) -> therefore not Whoosh(davina, tamera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The haskel contemn the heloise. The agneta is honored. The heloise create the haskel. If something is heartening then it contemn the heloise. If the agneta bobble the heloise and the heloise contemn the haskel then the agneta create the haskel. If something create the haskel then the haskel does not visit the agneta. If something is drilled then it is heartening. If something create the heloise and the heloise create the haskel then the heloise does not see the haskel. If something create the haskel and the haskel does not visit the agneta then it create the heloise. The heloise bobble the haskel.", "logic": "\nContemn(haskel, heloise)\nHonored(agneta)\nCreate(heloise, haskel)\nforall x (Heartening(x) -> Contemn(x, heloise))\nBobble(agneta, heloise) and Contemn(heloise, haskel) -> Create(agneta, haskel)\nforall x (Create(x, haskel) -> not Create(haskel, agneta))\nforall x (Drilled(x) -> Heartening(x))\nforall x (Create(x, heloise) and Create(heloise, haskel) -> not Bobble(heloise, haskel))\nforall x (Create(x, haskel) and not Create(haskel, agneta) -> Create(x, heloise))\n\nBobble(heloise, haskel)\n\nCreate(heloise, haskel) and forall x (Create(x, haskel) -> not Create(haskel, agneta)) -> therefore not Create(haskel, agneta) Create(heloise, haskel) and not Create(haskel, agneta) and forall x (Create(x, haskel) and not Create(haskel, agneta) -> Create(x, heloise)) -> therefore Create(heloise, heloise) Create(heloise, heloise) and Create(heloise, haskel) and forall x (Create(x, heloise) and Create(heloise, haskel) -> not Bobble(heloise, haskel)) -> therefore not Bobble(heloise, haskel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The benoite slap the nerte. The melba is dumbstruck. The nerte carol the benoite. If something is lucullan then it slap the nerte. If the melba haunt the nerte and the nerte slap the benoite then the melba carol the benoite. If something carol the benoite then the benoite does not visit the melba. If something is trilobated then it is lucullan. If something carol the nerte and the nerte carol the benoite then the nerte does not see the benoite. If something carol the benoite and the benoite does not visit the melba then it carol the nerte. The melba does not visit the nerte.", "logic": "\nSlap(benoite, nerte)\nDumbstruck(melba)\nCarol(nerte, benoite)\nforall x (Lucullan(x) -> Slap(x, nerte))\nHaunt(melba, nerte) and Slap(nerte, benoite) -> Carol(melba, benoite)\nforall x (Carol(x, benoite) -> not Carol(benoite, melba))\nforall x (Trilobated(x) -> Lucullan(x))\nforall x (Carol(x, nerte) and Carol(nerte, benoite) -> not Haunt(nerte, benoite))\nforall x (Carol(x, benoite) and not Carol(benoite, melba) -> Carol(x, nerte))\n\nnot Carol(melba, nerte)\n\nforall x (Carol(x, benoite) and not Carol(benoite, melba) -> Carol(x, nerte)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The ashlen unbelt the jerome. The darren is tripinnate. The jerome reproach the ashlen. If something is aligning then it unbelt the jerome. If the darren modernize the jerome and the jerome unbelt the ashlen then the darren reproach the ashlen. If something reproach the ashlen then the ashlen does not visit the darren. If something is comely then it is aligning. If something reproach the jerome and the jerome reproach the ashlen then the jerome does not see the ashlen. If something reproach the ashlen and the ashlen does not visit the darren then it reproach the jerome. The darren reproach the ashlen.", "logic": "\nUnbelt(ashlen, jerome)\nTripinnate(darren)\nReproach(jerome, ashlen)\nforall x (Aligning(x) -> Unbelt(x, jerome))\nModernize(darren, jerome) and Unbelt(jerome, ashlen) -> Reproach(darren, ashlen)\nforall x (Reproach(x, ashlen) -> not Reproach(ashlen, darren))\nforall x (Comely(x) -> Aligning(x))\nforall x (Reproach(x, jerome) and Reproach(jerome, ashlen) -> not Modernize(jerome, ashlen))\nforall x (Reproach(x, ashlen) and not Reproach(ashlen, darren) -> Reproach(x, jerome))\n\nReproach(darren, ashlen)\n\nModernize(darren, jerome) and Unbelt(jerome, ashlen) -> Reproach(darren, ashlen) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The maegan palm the kati. The bendite is taiwanese. The kati untwist the maegan. If something is threatened then it palm the kati. If the bendite plunk the kati and the kati palm the maegan then the bendite untwist the maegan. If something untwist the maegan then the maegan does not visit the bendite. If something is doleful then it is threatened. If something untwist the kati and the kati untwist the maegan then the kati does not see the maegan. If something untwist the maegan and the maegan does not visit the bendite then it untwist the kati. The kati does not eat the kati.", "logic": "\nPalm(maegan, kati)\nTaiwanese(bendite)\nUntwist(kati, maegan)\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Palm(x, kati))\nPlunk(bendite, kati) and Palm(kati, maegan) -> Untwist(bendite, maegan)\nforall x (Untwist(x, maegan) -> not Untwist(maegan, bendite))\nforall x (Doleful(x) -> Threatened(x))\nforall x (Untwist(x, kati) and Untwist(kati, maegan) -> not Plunk(kati, maegan))\nforall x (Untwist(x, maegan) and not Untwist(maegan, bendite) -> Untwist(x, kati))\n\nnot Palm(kati, kati)\n\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Palm(x, kati)) <- forall x (Doleful(x) -> Threatened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The nero rent the bancroft. The suki is earthbound. The bancroft bolshevise the nero. If something is vestibular then it rent the bancroft. If the suki overhear the bancroft and the bancroft rent the nero then the suki bolshevise the nero. If something bolshevise the nero then the nero does not visit the suki. If something is spoilable then it is vestibular. If something bolshevise the bancroft and the bancroft bolshevise the nero then the bancroft does not see the nero. If something bolshevise the nero and the nero does not visit the suki then it bolshevise the bancroft. The nero is vestibular.", "logic": "\nRent(nero, bancroft)\nEarthbound(suki)\nBolshevise(bancroft, nero)\nforall x (Vestibular(x) -> Rent(x, bancroft))\nOverhear(suki, bancroft) and Rent(bancroft, nero) -> Bolshevise(suki, nero)\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, nero) -> not Bolshevise(nero, suki))\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, bancroft) and Bolshevise(bancroft, nero) -> not Overhear(bancroft, nero))\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, nero) and not Bolshevise(nero, suki) -> Bolshevise(x, bancroft))\n\nVestibular(nero)\n\nforall x (Spoilable(x) -> Vestibular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The archy utter the iago. The marwin is lxxvi. The iago slag the archy. If something is xxiv then it utter the iago. If the marwin expedite the iago and the iago utter the archy then the marwin slag the archy. If something slag the archy then the archy does not visit the marwin. If something is annelidan then it is xxiv. If something slag the iago and the iago slag the archy then the iago does not see the archy. If something slag the archy and the archy does not visit the marwin then it slag the iago. The archy does not see the iago.", "logic": "\nUtter(archy, iago)\nLxxvi(marwin)\nSlag(iago, archy)\nforall x (Xxiv(x) -> Utter(x, iago))\nExpedite(marwin, iago) and Utter(iago, archy) -> Slag(marwin, archy)\nforall x (Slag(x, archy) -> not Slag(archy, marwin))\nforall x (Annelidan(x) -> Xxiv(x))\nforall x (Slag(x, iago) and Slag(iago, archy) -> not Expedite(iago, archy))\nforall x (Slag(x, archy) and not Slag(archy, marwin) -> Slag(x, iago))\n\nnot Expedite(archy, iago)\n\nnot Expedite(archy, iago) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The cecily lignify the edy. The elaina is tremulous. The edy impanel the cecily. If something is listed then it lignify the edy. If the elaina ship the edy and the edy lignify the cecily then the elaina impanel the cecily. If something impanel the cecily then the cecily does not visit the elaina. If something is odorless then it is listed. If something impanel the edy and the edy impanel the cecily then the edy does not see the cecily. If something impanel the cecily and the cecily does not visit the elaina then it impanel the edy. The cecily lignify the cecily.", "logic": "\nLignify(cecily, edy)\nTremulous(elaina)\nImpanel(edy, cecily)\nforall x (Listed(x) -> Lignify(x, edy))\nShip(elaina, edy) and Lignify(edy, cecily) -> Impanel(elaina, cecily)\nforall x (Impanel(x, cecily) -> not Impanel(cecily, elaina))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> Listed(x))\nforall x (Impanel(x, edy) and Impanel(edy, cecily) -> not Ship(edy, cecily))\nforall x (Impanel(x, cecily) and not Impanel(cecily, elaina) -> Impanel(x, edy))\n\nLignify(cecily, cecily)\n\nLignify(cecily, cecily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The biff itemize the brina. The thorpe is grubby. The brina graduate the biff. If something is great then it itemize the brina. If the thorpe apprise the brina and the brina itemize the biff then the thorpe graduate the biff. If something graduate the biff then the biff does not visit the thorpe. If something is rich then it is great. If something graduate the brina and the brina graduate the biff then the brina does not see the biff. If something graduate the biff and the biff does not visit the thorpe then it graduate the brina. The brina does not eat the biff.", "logic": "\nItemize(biff, brina)\nGrubby(thorpe)\nGraduate(brina, biff)\nforall x (Great(x) -> Itemize(x, brina))\nApprise(thorpe, brina) and Itemize(brina, biff) -> Graduate(thorpe, biff)\nforall x (Graduate(x, biff) -> not Graduate(biff, thorpe))\nforall x (Rich(x) -> Great(x))\nforall x (Graduate(x, brina) and Graduate(brina, biff) -> not Apprise(brina, biff))\nforall x (Graduate(x, biff) and not Graduate(biff, thorpe) -> Graduate(x, brina))\n\nnot Itemize(brina, biff)\n\nnot Itemize(brina, biff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The teri devil the giavani. The isaiah is patented. The giavani achieve the teri. If something is laminal then it devil the giavani. If the isaiah resew the giavani and the giavani devil the teri then the isaiah achieve the teri. If something achieve the teri then the teri does not visit the isaiah. If something is knockabout then it is laminal. If something achieve the giavani and the giavani achieve the teri then the giavani does not see the teri. If something achieve the teri and the teri does not visit the isaiah then it achieve the giavani. The giavani is knockabout.", "logic": "\nDevil(teri, giavani)\nPatented(isaiah)\nAchieve(giavani, teri)\nforall x (Laminal(x) -> Devil(x, giavani))\nResew(isaiah, giavani) and Devil(giavani, teri) -> Achieve(isaiah, teri)\nforall x (Achieve(x, teri) -> not Achieve(teri, isaiah))\nforall x (Knockabout(x) -> Laminal(x))\nforall x (Achieve(x, giavani) and Achieve(giavani, teri) -> not Resew(giavani, teri))\nforall x (Achieve(x, teri) and not Achieve(teri, isaiah) -> Achieve(x, giavani))\n\nKnockabout(giavani)\n\nKnockabout(giavani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-478"} {"premises": "The jilly lubricate the lazlo. The marchelle does not eat the nicholle. The lazlo smirk the nicholle. The nicholle is alsatian. If something steamroll the jilly then the jilly does not chase the lazlo. If something smirk the lazlo and the lazlo is alsatian then it lubricate the nicholle. If something is alsatian then it is veridical. If something lubricate the lazlo then it is notable. If something steamroll the jilly and it lubricate the nicholle then the jilly lubricate the lazlo. If something lubricate the lazlo and it does not visit the marchelle then the lazlo does not eat the jilly. If something is notable then it is alsatian. If something is alsatian and it smirk the jilly then it smirk the nicholle. The marchelle does not eat the nicholle.", "logic": "\nLubricate(jilly, lazlo)\nnot Lubricate(marchelle, nicholle)\nSmirk(lazlo, nicholle)\nAlsatian(nicholle)\nforall x (Steamroll(x, jilly) -> not Steamroll(jilly, lazlo))\nforall x (Smirk(x, lazlo) and Alsatian(lazlo) -> Lubricate(x, nicholle))\nforall x (Alsatian(x) -> Veridical(x))\nforall x (Lubricate(x, lazlo) -> Notable(x))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, jilly) and Lubricate(x, nicholle) -> Lubricate(jilly, lazlo))\nforall x (Lubricate(x, lazlo) and not Smirk(x, marchelle) -> not Lubricate(lazlo, jilly))\nforall x (Notable(x) -> Alsatian(x))\nforall x (Alsatian(x) and Smirk(x, jilly) -> Smirk(x, nicholle))\n\nnot Lubricate(marchelle, nicholle)\n\ntherefore not Lubricate(marchelle, nicholle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The lianna beetle the merralee. The jerri does not eat the ashlie. The merralee slew the ashlie. The ashlie is backhanded. If something nurture the lianna then the lianna does not chase the merralee. If something slew the merralee and the merralee is backhanded then it beetle the ashlie. If something is backhanded then it is immune. If something beetle the merralee then it is grand. If something nurture the lianna and it beetle the ashlie then the lianna beetle the merralee. If something beetle the merralee and it does not visit the jerri then the merralee does not eat the lianna. If something is grand then it is backhanded. If something is backhanded and it slew the lianna then it slew the ashlie. The ashlie is not backhanded.", "logic": "\nBeetle(lianna, merralee)\nnot Beetle(jerri, ashlie)\nSlew(merralee, ashlie)\nBackhanded(ashlie)\nforall x (Nurture(x, lianna) -> not Nurture(lianna, merralee))\nforall x (Slew(x, merralee) and Backhanded(merralee) -> Beetle(x, ashlie))\nforall x (Backhanded(x) -> Immune(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x, merralee) -> Grand(x))\nforall x (Nurture(x, lianna) and Beetle(x, ashlie) -> Beetle(lianna, merralee))\nforall x (Beetle(x, merralee) and not Slew(x, jerri) -> not Beetle(merralee, lianna))\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Backhanded(x))\nforall x (Backhanded(x) and Slew(x, lianna) -> Slew(x, ashlie))\n\nnot Backhanded(ashlie)\n\ntherefore Backhanded(ashlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The jennings sodomize the davidson. The misti does not eat the gipsy. The davidson hazard the gipsy. The gipsy is assured. If something parrot the jennings then the jennings does not chase the davidson. If something hazard the davidson and the davidson is assured then it sodomize the gipsy. If something is assured then it is amylolytic. If something sodomize the davidson then it is ancient. If something parrot the jennings and it sodomize the gipsy then the jennings sodomize the davidson. If something sodomize the davidson and it does not visit the misti then the davidson does not eat the jennings. If something is ancient then it is assured. If something is assured and it hazard the jennings then it hazard the gipsy. The jennings is ancient.", "logic": "\nSodomize(jennings, davidson)\nnot Sodomize(misti, gipsy)\nHazard(davidson, gipsy)\nAssured(gipsy)\nforall x (Parrot(x, jennings) -> not Parrot(jennings, davidson))\nforall x (Hazard(x, davidson) and Assured(davidson) -> Sodomize(x, gipsy))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Amylolytic(x))\nforall x (Sodomize(x, davidson) -> Ancient(x))\nforall x (Parrot(x, jennings) and Sodomize(x, gipsy) -> Sodomize(jennings, davidson))\nforall x (Sodomize(x, davidson) and not Hazard(x, misti) -> not Sodomize(davidson, jennings))\nforall x (Ancient(x) -> Assured(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) and Hazard(x, jennings) -> Hazard(x, gipsy))\n\nAncient(jennings)\n\nSodomize(jennings, davidson) and forall x (Sodomize(x, davidson) -> Ancient(x)) -> therefore Ancient(jennings)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The dwain disincline the andri. The tracee does not eat the inga. The andri chord the inga. The inga is exempt. If something skitter the dwain then the dwain does not chase the andri. If something chord the andri and the andri is exempt then it disincline the inga. If something is exempt then it is full. If something disincline the andri then it is malawian. If something skitter the dwain and it disincline the inga then the dwain disincline the andri. If something disincline the andri and it does not visit the tracee then the andri does not eat the dwain. If something is malawian then it is exempt. If something is exempt and it chord the dwain then it chord the inga. The inga is not full.", "logic": "\nDisincline(dwain, andri)\nnot Disincline(tracee, inga)\nChord(andri, inga)\nExempt(inga)\nforall x (Skitter(x, dwain) -> not Skitter(dwain, andri))\nforall x (Chord(x, andri) and Exempt(andri) -> Disincline(x, inga))\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Full(x))\nforall x (Disincline(x, andri) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Skitter(x, dwain) and Disincline(x, inga) -> Disincline(dwain, andri))\nforall x (Disincline(x, andri) and not Chord(x, tracee) -> not Disincline(andri, dwain))\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Exempt(x))\nforall x (Exempt(x) and Chord(x, dwain) -> Chord(x, inga))\n\nnot Full(inga)\n\nExempt(inga) and forall x (Exempt(x) -> Full(x)) -> therefore Full(inga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The herold crook the pearl. The eba does not eat the romola. The pearl aestivate the romola. The romola is irruptive. If something summons the herold then the herold does not chase the pearl. If something aestivate the pearl and the pearl is irruptive then it crook the romola. If something is irruptive then it is semestral. If something crook the pearl then it is tottery. If something summons the herold and it crook the romola then the herold crook the pearl. If something crook the pearl and it does not visit the eba then the pearl does not eat the herold. If something is tottery then it is irruptive. If something is irruptive and it aestivate the herold then it aestivate the romola. The herold is irruptive.", "logic": "\nCrook(herold, pearl)\nnot Crook(eba, romola)\nAestivate(pearl, romola)\nIrruptive(romola)\nforall x (Summons(x, herold) -> not Summons(herold, pearl))\nforall x (Aestivate(x, pearl) and Irruptive(pearl) -> Crook(x, romola))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) -> Semestral(x))\nforall x (Crook(x, pearl) -> Tottery(x))\nforall x (Summons(x, herold) and Crook(x, romola) -> Crook(herold, pearl))\nforall x (Crook(x, pearl) and not Aestivate(x, eba) -> not Crook(pearl, herold))\nforall x (Tottery(x) -> Irruptive(x))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) and Aestivate(x, herold) -> Aestivate(x, romola))\n\nIrruptive(herold)\n\nCrook(herold, pearl) and forall x (Crook(x, pearl) -> Tottery(x)) -> therefore Tottery(herold) Tottery(herold) and forall x (Tottery(x) -> Irruptive(x)) -> therefore Irruptive(herold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The dollie plop the roxi. The sunshine does not eat the gavin. The roxi polarise the gavin. The gavin is bronchial. If something dope the dollie then the dollie does not chase the roxi. If something polarise the roxi and the roxi is bronchial then it plop the gavin. If something is bronchial then it is rainproof. If something plop the roxi then it is unsocial. If something dope the dollie and it plop the gavin then the dollie plop the roxi. If something plop the roxi and it does not visit the sunshine then the roxi does not eat the dollie. If something is unsocial then it is bronchial. If something is bronchial and it polarise the dollie then it polarise the gavin. The dollie is not bronchial.", "logic": "\nPlop(dollie, roxi)\nnot Plop(sunshine, gavin)\nPolarise(roxi, gavin)\nBronchial(gavin)\nforall x (Dope(x, dollie) -> not Dope(dollie, roxi))\nforall x (Polarise(x, roxi) and Bronchial(roxi) -> Plop(x, gavin))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Rainproof(x))\nforall x (Plop(x, roxi) -> Unsocial(x))\nforall x (Dope(x, dollie) and Plop(x, gavin) -> Plop(dollie, roxi))\nforall x (Plop(x, roxi) and not Polarise(x, sunshine) -> not Plop(roxi, dollie))\nforall x (Unsocial(x) -> Bronchial(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) and Polarise(x, dollie) -> Polarise(x, gavin))\n\nnot Bronchial(dollie)\n\nPlop(dollie, roxi) and forall x (Plop(x, roxi) -> Unsocial(x)) -> therefore Unsocial(dollie) Unsocial(dollie) and forall x (Unsocial(x) -> Bronchial(x)) -> therefore Bronchial(dollie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The bert stag the acacia. The opaline does not eat the vassily. The acacia blast the vassily. The vassily is cuspidate. If something discomfit the bert then the bert does not chase the acacia. If something blast the acacia and the acacia is cuspidate then it stag the vassily. If something is cuspidate then it is chummy. If something stag the acacia then it is unobvious. If something discomfit the bert and it stag the vassily then the bert stag the acacia. If something stag the acacia and it does not visit the opaline then the acacia does not eat the bert. If something is unobvious then it is cuspidate. If something is cuspidate and it blast the bert then it blast the vassily. The bert is chummy.", "logic": "\nStag(bert, acacia)\nnot Stag(opaline, vassily)\nBlast(acacia, vassily)\nCuspidate(vassily)\nforall x (Discomfit(x, bert) -> not Discomfit(bert, acacia))\nforall x (Blast(x, acacia) and Cuspidate(acacia) -> Stag(x, vassily))\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Stag(x, acacia) -> Unobvious(x))\nforall x (Discomfit(x, bert) and Stag(x, vassily) -> Stag(bert, acacia))\nforall x (Stag(x, acacia) and not Blast(x, opaline) -> not Stag(acacia, bert))\nforall x (Unobvious(x) -> Cuspidate(x))\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) and Blast(x, bert) -> Blast(x, vassily))\n\nChummy(bert)\n\nStag(bert, acacia) and forall x (Stag(x, acacia) -> Unobvious(x)) -> therefore Unobvious(bert) Unobvious(bert) and forall x (Unobvious(x) -> Cuspidate(x)) -> therefore Cuspidate(bert) Cuspidate(bert) and forall x (Cuspidate(x) -> Chummy(x)) -> therefore Chummy(bert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The avery alkalise the nessa. The hersch does not eat the demetri. The nessa puncture the demetri. The demetri is recursive. If something bray the avery then the avery does not chase the nessa. If something puncture the nessa and the nessa is recursive then it alkalise the demetri. If something is recursive then it is rheologic. If something alkalise the nessa then it is undetected. If something bray the avery and it alkalise the demetri then the avery alkalise the nessa. If something alkalise the nessa and it does not visit the hersch then the nessa does not eat the avery. If something is undetected then it is recursive. If something is recursive and it puncture the avery then it puncture the demetri. The avery is not rheologic.", "logic": "\nAlkalise(avery, nessa)\nnot Alkalise(hersch, demetri)\nPuncture(nessa, demetri)\nRecursive(demetri)\nforall x (Bray(x, avery) -> not Bray(avery, nessa))\nforall x (Puncture(x, nessa) and Recursive(nessa) -> Alkalise(x, demetri))\nforall x (Recursive(x) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, nessa) -> Undetected(x))\nforall x (Bray(x, avery) and Alkalise(x, demetri) -> Alkalise(avery, nessa))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, nessa) and not Puncture(x, hersch) -> not Alkalise(nessa, avery))\nforall x (Undetected(x) -> Recursive(x))\nforall x (Recursive(x) and Puncture(x, avery) -> Puncture(x, demetri))\n\nnot Rheologic(avery)\n\nAlkalise(avery, nessa) and forall x (Alkalise(x, nessa) -> Undetected(x)) -> therefore Undetected(avery) Undetected(avery) and forall x (Undetected(x) -> Recursive(x)) -> therefore Recursive(avery) Recursive(avery) and forall x (Recursive(x) -> Rheologic(x)) -> therefore Rheologic(avery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The iggie police the dorena. The mathias does not eat the edgardo. The dorena repute the edgardo. The edgardo is fictile. If something misstate the iggie then the iggie does not chase the dorena. If something repute the dorena and the dorena is fictile then it police the edgardo. If something is fictile then it is sarawakian. If something police the dorena then it is farseeing. If something misstate the iggie and it police the edgardo then the iggie police the dorena. If something police the dorena and it does not visit the mathias then the dorena does not eat the iggie. If something is farseeing then it is fictile. If something is fictile and it repute the iggie then it repute the edgardo. The mathias does not visit the edgardo.", "logic": "\nPolice(iggie, dorena)\nnot Police(mathias, edgardo)\nRepute(dorena, edgardo)\nFictile(edgardo)\nforall x (Misstate(x, iggie) -> not Misstate(iggie, dorena))\nforall x (Repute(x, dorena) and Fictile(dorena) -> Police(x, edgardo))\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Sarawakian(x))\nforall x (Police(x, dorena) -> Farseeing(x))\nforall x (Misstate(x, iggie) and Police(x, edgardo) -> Police(iggie, dorena))\nforall x (Police(x, dorena) and not Repute(x, mathias) -> not Police(dorena, iggie))\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Fictile(x))\nforall x (Fictile(x) and Repute(x, iggie) -> Repute(x, edgardo))\n\nnot Repute(mathias, edgardo)\n\nforall x (Fictile(x) and Repute(x, iggie) -> Repute(x, edgardo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The rhetta tattle the illa. The johannah does not eat the ernest. The illa recover the ernest. The ernest is geodetic. If something laicize the rhetta then the rhetta does not chase the illa. If something recover the illa and the illa is geodetic then it tattle the ernest. If something is geodetic then it is destitute. If something tattle the illa then it is unsuasible. If something laicize the rhetta and it tattle the ernest then the rhetta tattle the illa. If something tattle the illa and it does not visit the johannah then the illa does not eat the rhetta. If something is unsuasible then it is geodetic. If something is geodetic and it recover the rhetta then it recover the ernest. The ernest is unsuasible.", "logic": "\nTattle(rhetta, illa)\nnot Tattle(johannah, ernest)\nRecover(illa, ernest)\nGeodetic(ernest)\nforall x (Laicize(x, rhetta) -> not Laicize(rhetta, illa))\nforall x (Recover(x, illa) and Geodetic(illa) -> Tattle(x, ernest))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> Destitute(x))\nforall x (Tattle(x, illa) -> Unsuasible(x))\nforall x (Laicize(x, rhetta) and Tattle(x, ernest) -> Tattle(rhetta, illa))\nforall x (Tattle(x, illa) and not Recover(x, johannah) -> not Tattle(illa, rhetta))\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Geodetic(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) and Recover(x, rhetta) -> Recover(x, ernest))\n\nUnsuasible(ernest)\n\nforall x (Tattle(x, illa) -> Unsuasible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The charmain ration the benton. The hirsch does not eat the ora. The benton crinkle the ora. The ora is robotlike. If something caterwaul the charmain then the charmain does not chase the benton. If something crinkle the benton and the benton is robotlike then it ration the ora. If something is robotlike then it is parented. If something ration the benton then it is vapourific. If something caterwaul the charmain and it ration the ora then the charmain ration the benton. If something ration the benton and it does not visit the hirsch then the benton does not eat the charmain. If something is vapourific then it is robotlike. If something is robotlike and it crinkle the charmain then it crinkle the ora. The charmain does not visit the ora.", "logic": "\nRation(charmain, benton)\nnot Ration(hirsch, ora)\nCrinkle(benton, ora)\nRobotlike(ora)\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, charmain) -> not Caterwaul(charmain, benton))\nforall x (Crinkle(x, benton) and Robotlike(benton) -> Ration(x, ora))\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Parented(x))\nforall x (Ration(x, benton) -> Vapourific(x))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, charmain) and Ration(x, ora) -> Ration(charmain, benton))\nforall x (Ration(x, benton) and not Crinkle(x, hirsch) -> not Ration(benton, charmain))\nforall x (Vapourific(x) -> Robotlike(x))\nforall x (Robotlike(x) and Crinkle(x, charmain) -> Crinkle(x, ora))\n\nnot Crinkle(charmain, ora)\n\nforall x (Robotlike(x) and Crinkle(x, charmain) -> Crinkle(x, ora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The giovanni placate the aguinaldo. The dorelia does not eat the katerine. The aguinaldo archive the katerine. The katerine is boric. If something ptyalize the giovanni then the giovanni does not chase the aguinaldo. If something archive the aguinaldo and the aguinaldo is boric then it placate the katerine. If something is boric then it is cancellous. If something placate the aguinaldo then it is skeptical. If something ptyalize the giovanni and it placate the katerine then the giovanni placate the aguinaldo. If something placate the aguinaldo and it does not visit the dorelia then the aguinaldo does not eat the giovanni. If something is skeptical then it is boric. If something is boric and it archive the giovanni then it archive the katerine. The dorelia is cancellous.", "logic": "\nPlacate(giovanni, aguinaldo)\nnot Placate(dorelia, katerine)\nArchive(aguinaldo, katerine)\nBoric(katerine)\nforall x (Ptyalize(x, giovanni) -> not Ptyalize(giovanni, aguinaldo))\nforall x (Archive(x, aguinaldo) and Boric(aguinaldo) -> Placate(x, katerine))\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Cancellous(x))\nforall x (Placate(x, aguinaldo) -> Skeptical(x))\nforall x (Ptyalize(x, giovanni) and Placate(x, katerine) -> Placate(giovanni, aguinaldo))\nforall x (Placate(x, aguinaldo) and not Archive(x, dorelia) -> not Placate(aguinaldo, giovanni))\nforall x (Skeptical(x) -> Boric(x))\nforall x (Boric(x) and Archive(x, giovanni) -> Archive(x, katerine))\n\nCancellous(dorelia)\n\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Cancellous(x)) <- forall x (Skeptical(x) -> Boric(x)) <- forall x (Placate(x, aguinaldo) -> Skeptical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The elena furl the mehetabel. The deanna does not eat the tami. The mehetabel metabolize the tami. The tami is permeating. If something titivate the elena then the elena does not chase the mehetabel. If something metabolize the mehetabel and the mehetabel is permeating then it furl the tami. If something is permeating then it is sonsie. If something furl the mehetabel then it is impenitent. If something titivate the elena and it furl the tami then the elena furl the mehetabel. If something furl the mehetabel and it does not visit the deanna then the mehetabel does not eat the elena. If something is impenitent then it is permeating. If something is permeating and it metabolize the elena then it metabolize the tami. The deanna does not eat the elena.", "logic": "\nFurl(elena, mehetabel)\nnot Furl(deanna, tami)\nMetabolize(mehetabel, tami)\nPermeating(tami)\nforall x (Titivate(x, elena) -> not Titivate(elena, mehetabel))\nforall x (Metabolize(x, mehetabel) and Permeating(mehetabel) -> Furl(x, tami))\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Sonsie(x))\nforall x (Furl(x, mehetabel) -> Impenitent(x))\nforall x (Titivate(x, elena) and Furl(x, tami) -> Furl(elena, mehetabel))\nforall x (Furl(x, mehetabel) and not Metabolize(x, deanna) -> not Furl(mehetabel, elena))\nforall x (Impenitent(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Permeating(x) and Metabolize(x, elena) -> Metabolize(x, tami))\n\nnot Furl(deanna, elena)\n\nnot Furl(deanna, elena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The kenneth bodge the georgiana. The patel does not eat the jamima. The georgiana educe the jamima. The jamima is common. If something savage the kenneth then the kenneth does not chase the georgiana. If something educe the georgiana and the georgiana is common then it bodge the jamima. If something is common then it is afoul. If something bodge the georgiana then it is petalous. If something savage the kenneth and it bodge the jamima then the kenneth bodge the georgiana. If something bodge the georgiana and it does not visit the patel then the georgiana does not eat the kenneth. If something is petalous then it is common. If something is common and it educe the kenneth then it educe the jamima. The georgiana bodge the patel.", "logic": "\nBodge(kenneth, georgiana)\nnot Bodge(patel, jamima)\nEduce(georgiana, jamima)\nCommon(jamima)\nforall x (Savage(x, kenneth) -> not Savage(kenneth, georgiana))\nforall x (Educe(x, georgiana) and Common(georgiana) -> Bodge(x, jamima))\nforall x (Common(x) -> Afoul(x))\nforall x (Bodge(x, georgiana) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Savage(x, kenneth) and Bodge(x, jamima) -> Bodge(kenneth, georgiana))\nforall x (Bodge(x, georgiana) and not Educe(x, patel) -> not Bodge(georgiana, kenneth))\nforall x (Petalous(x) -> Common(x))\nforall x (Common(x) and Educe(x, kenneth) -> Educe(x, jamima))\n\nBodge(georgiana, patel)\n\nBodge(georgiana, patel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The chelsy repoint the pris. The thurstan does not eat the westley. The pris mist the westley. The westley is uneducated. If something preoccupy the chelsy then the chelsy does not chase the pris. If something mist the pris and the pris is uneducated then it repoint the westley. If something is uneducated then it is uneven. If something repoint the pris then it is bursal. If something preoccupy the chelsy and it repoint the westley then the chelsy repoint the pris. If something repoint the pris and it does not visit the thurstan then the pris does not eat the chelsy. If something is bursal then it is uneducated. If something is uneducated and it mist the chelsy then it mist the westley. The pris does not chase the chelsy.", "logic": "\nRepoint(chelsy, pris)\nnot Repoint(thurstan, westley)\nMist(pris, westley)\nUneducated(westley)\nforall x (Preoccupy(x, chelsy) -> not Preoccupy(chelsy, pris))\nforall x (Mist(x, pris) and Uneducated(pris) -> Repoint(x, westley))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) -> Uneven(x))\nforall x (Repoint(x, pris) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Preoccupy(x, chelsy) and Repoint(x, westley) -> Repoint(chelsy, pris))\nforall x (Repoint(x, pris) and not Mist(x, thurstan) -> not Repoint(pris, chelsy))\nforall x (Bursal(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Mist(x, chelsy) -> Mist(x, westley))\n\nnot Preoccupy(pris, chelsy)\n\nnot Preoccupy(pris, chelsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The luke mail the guillema. The valentin does not eat the werner. The guillema email the werner. The werner is gravid. If something inspect the luke then the luke does not chase the guillema. If something email the guillema and the guillema is gravid then it mail the werner. If something is gravid then it is gemmed. If something mail the guillema then it is pardonable. If something inspect the luke and it mail the werner then the luke mail the guillema. If something mail the guillema and it does not visit the valentin then the guillema does not eat the luke. If something is pardonable then it is gravid. If something is gravid and it email the luke then it email the werner. The valentin is round.", "logic": "\nMail(luke, guillema)\nnot Mail(valentin, werner)\nEmail(guillema, werner)\nGravid(werner)\nforall x (Inspect(x, luke) -> not Inspect(luke, guillema))\nforall x (Email(x, guillema) and Gravid(guillema) -> Mail(x, werner))\nforall x (Gravid(x) -> Gemmed(x))\nforall x (Mail(x, guillema) -> Pardonable(x))\nforall x (Inspect(x, luke) and Mail(x, werner) -> Mail(luke, guillema))\nforall x (Mail(x, guillema) and not Email(x, valentin) -> not Mail(guillema, luke))\nforall x (Pardonable(x) -> Gravid(x))\nforall x (Gravid(x) and Email(x, luke) -> Email(x, werner))\n\nRound(valentin)\n\nRound(valentin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The ruthy is aldehydic. The ruthy deflate the rosanne. The rosanne deflate the ruthy. The rosanne overdress the tabor. The tabor is resolute. The tabor deflate the rosanne. The tabor silhouette the ruthy. If something silhouette the tabor then the tabor does not visit the rosanne. If something deflate the ruthy then the ruthy is aldehydic. If something overdress the rosanne then it is vexatious. If something overdress the tabor then the tabor overdress the ruthy. If something is vexatious then it deflate the rosanne. If the tabor overdress the ruthy then the ruthy overdress the rosanne. If something overdress the tabor then it deflate the ruthy. If something overdress the ruthy then it does not visit the rosanne. The rosanne overdress the tabor.", "logic": "\nAldehydic(ruthy)\nDeflate(ruthy, rosanne)\nDeflate(rosanne, ruthy)\nOverdress(rosanne, tabor)\nResolute(tabor)\nDeflate(tabor, rosanne)\nSilhouette(tabor, ruthy)\nforall x (Silhouette(x, tabor) -> not Overdress(tabor, rosanne))\nforall x (Deflate(x, ruthy) -> Aldehydic(ruthy))\nforall x (Overdress(x, rosanne) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Overdress(x, tabor) -> Overdress(tabor, ruthy))\nforall x (Vexatious(x) -> Deflate(x, rosanne))\nOverdress(tabor, ruthy) -> Overdress(ruthy, rosanne)\nforall x (Overdress(x, tabor) -> Deflate(x, ruthy))\nforall x (Overdress(x, ruthy) -> not Overdress(x, rosanne))\n\nOverdress(rosanne, tabor)\n\ntherefore Overdress(rosanne, tabor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The theresa is coseismal. The theresa edify the hyacinthe. The hyacinthe edify the theresa. The hyacinthe trap the bertina. The bertina is facial. The bertina edify the hyacinthe. The bertina reactivate the theresa. If something reactivate the bertina then the bertina does not visit the hyacinthe. If something edify the theresa then the theresa is coseismal. If something trap the hyacinthe then it is preemptive. If something trap the bertina then the bertina trap the theresa. If something is preemptive then it edify the hyacinthe. If the bertina trap the theresa then the theresa trap the hyacinthe. If something trap the bertina then it edify the theresa. If something trap the theresa then it does not visit the hyacinthe. The bertina does not see the theresa.", "logic": "\nCoseismal(theresa)\nEdify(theresa, hyacinthe)\nEdify(hyacinthe, theresa)\nTrap(hyacinthe, bertina)\nFacial(bertina)\nEdify(bertina, hyacinthe)\nReactivate(bertina, theresa)\nforall x (Reactivate(x, bertina) -> not Trap(bertina, hyacinthe))\nforall x (Edify(x, theresa) -> Coseismal(theresa))\nforall x (Trap(x, hyacinthe) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Trap(x, bertina) -> Trap(bertina, theresa))\nforall x (Preemptive(x) -> Edify(x, hyacinthe))\nTrap(bertina, theresa) -> Trap(theresa, hyacinthe)\nforall x (Trap(x, bertina) -> Edify(x, theresa))\nforall x (Trap(x, theresa) -> not Trap(x, hyacinthe))\n\nnot Reactivate(bertina, theresa)\n\ntherefore Reactivate(bertina, theresa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The raquel is scottish. The raquel expend the tania. The tania expend the raquel. The tania pace the teddie. The teddie is adjuvant. The teddie expend the tania. The teddie remove the raquel. If something remove the teddie then the teddie does not visit the tania. If something expend the raquel then the raquel is scottish. If something pace the tania then it is civilian. If something pace the teddie then the teddie pace the raquel. If something is civilian then it expend the tania. If the teddie pace the raquel then the raquel pace the tania. If something pace the teddie then it expend the raquel. If something pace the raquel then it does not visit the tania. The teddie pace the raquel.", "logic": "\nScottish(raquel)\nExpend(raquel, tania)\nExpend(tania, raquel)\nPace(tania, teddie)\nAdjuvant(teddie)\nExpend(teddie, tania)\nRemove(teddie, raquel)\nforall x (Remove(x, teddie) -> not Pace(teddie, tania))\nforall x (Expend(x, raquel) -> Scottish(raquel))\nforall x (Pace(x, tania) -> Civilian(x))\nforall x (Pace(x, teddie) -> Pace(teddie, raquel))\nforall x (Civilian(x) -> Expend(x, tania))\nPace(teddie, raquel) -> Pace(raquel, tania)\nforall x (Pace(x, teddie) -> Expend(x, raquel))\nforall x (Pace(x, raquel) -> not Pace(x, tania))\n\nPace(teddie, raquel)\n\nPace(tania, teddie) and forall x (Pace(x, teddie) -> Pace(teddie, raquel)) -> therefore Pace(teddie, raquel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The cris is lowered. The cris collate the kenny. The kenny collate the cris. The kenny regard the emilie. The emilie is sexless. The emilie collate the kenny. The emilie bedamn the cris. If something bedamn the emilie then the emilie does not visit the kenny. If something collate the cris then the cris is lowered. If something regard the kenny then it is slashed. If something regard the emilie then the emilie regard the cris. If something is slashed then it collate the kenny. If the emilie regard the cris then the cris regard the kenny. If something regard the emilie then it collate the cris. If something regard the cris then it does not visit the kenny. The emilie does not visit the cris.", "logic": "\nLowered(cris)\nCollate(cris, kenny)\nCollate(kenny, cris)\nRegard(kenny, emilie)\nSexless(emilie)\nCollate(emilie, kenny)\nBedamn(emilie, cris)\nforall x (Bedamn(x, emilie) -> not Regard(emilie, kenny))\nforall x (Collate(x, cris) -> Lowered(cris))\nforall x (Regard(x, kenny) -> Slashed(x))\nforall x (Regard(x, emilie) -> Regard(emilie, cris))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Collate(x, kenny))\nRegard(emilie, cris) -> Regard(cris, kenny)\nforall x (Regard(x, emilie) -> Collate(x, cris))\nforall x (Regard(x, cris) -> not Regard(x, kenny))\n\nnot Regard(emilie, cris)\n\nRegard(kenny, emilie) and forall x (Regard(x, emilie) -> Regard(emilie, cris)) -> therefore Regard(emilie, cris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The swen is likeable. The swen align the emylee. The emylee align the swen. The emylee embark the franklyn. The franklyn is ambiguous. The franklyn align the emylee. The franklyn railroad the swen. If something railroad the franklyn then the franklyn does not visit the emylee. If something align the swen then the swen is likeable. If something embark the emylee then it is plumbable. If something embark the franklyn then the franklyn embark the swen. If something is plumbable then it align the emylee. If the franklyn embark the swen then the swen embark the emylee. If something embark the franklyn then it align the swen. If something embark the swen then it does not visit the emylee. The swen embark the emylee.", "logic": "\nLikeable(swen)\nAlign(swen, emylee)\nAlign(emylee, swen)\nEmbark(emylee, franklyn)\nAmbiguous(franklyn)\nAlign(franklyn, emylee)\nRailroad(franklyn, swen)\nforall x (Railroad(x, franklyn) -> not Embark(franklyn, emylee))\nforall x (Align(x, swen) -> Likeable(swen))\nforall x (Embark(x, emylee) -> Plumbable(x))\nforall x (Embark(x, franklyn) -> Embark(franklyn, swen))\nforall x (Plumbable(x) -> Align(x, emylee))\nEmbark(franklyn, swen) -> Embark(swen, emylee)\nforall x (Embark(x, franklyn) -> Align(x, swen))\nforall x (Embark(x, swen) -> not Embark(x, emylee))\n\nEmbark(swen, emylee)\n\nEmbark(emylee, franklyn) and forall x (Embark(x, franklyn) -> Embark(franklyn, swen)) -> therefore Embark(franklyn, swen) Embark(franklyn, swen) and Embark(franklyn, swen) -> Embark(swen, emylee) -> therefore Embark(swen, emylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The clark is runic. The clark alert the dorrie. The dorrie alert the clark. The dorrie farm the milena. The milena is witty. The milena alert the dorrie. The milena juxtapose the clark. If something juxtapose the milena then the milena does not visit the dorrie. If something alert the clark then the clark is runic. If something farm the dorrie then it is oecumenic. If something farm the milena then the milena farm the clark. If something is oecumenic then it alert the dorrie. If the milena farm the clark then the clark farm the dorrie. If something farm the milena then it alert the clark. If something farm the clark then it does not visit the dorrie. The clark does not visit the dorrie.", "logic": "\nRunic(clark)\nAlert(clark, dorrie)\nAlert(dorrie, clark)\nFarm(dorrie, milena)\nWitty(milena)\nAlert(milena, dorrie)\nJuxtapose(milena, clark)\nforall x (Juxtapose(x, milena) -> not Farm(milena, dorrie))\nforall x (Alert(x, clark) -> Runic(clark))\nforall x (Farm(x, dorrie) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Farm(x, milena) -> Farm(milena, clark))\nforall x (Oecumenic(x) -> Alert(x, dorrie))\nFarm(milena, clark) -> Farm(clark, dorrie)\nforall x (Farm(x, milena) -> Alert(x, clark))\nforall x (Farm(x, clark) -> not Farm(x, dorrie))\n\nnot Farm(clark, dorrie)\n\nFarm(dorrie, milena) and forall x (Farm(x, milena) -> Farm(milena, clark)) -> therefore Farm(milena, clark) Farm(milena, clark) and Farm(milena, clark) -> Farm(clark, dorrie) -> therefore Farm(clark, dorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The maurene is correlate. The maurene mistreat the kynthia. The kynthia mistreat the maurene. The kynthia disregard the doroteya. The doroteya is perfumed. The doroteya mistreat the kynthia. The doroteya forge the maurene. If something forge the doroteya then the doroteya does not visit the kynthia. If something mistreat the maurene then the maurene is correlate. If something disregard the kynthia then it is unguided. If something disregard the doroteya then the doroteya disregard the maurene. If something is unguided then it mistreat the kynthia. If the doroteya disregard the maurene then the maurene disregard the kynthia. If something disregard the doroteya then it mistreat the maurene. If something disregard the maurene then it does not visit the kynthia. The maurene is unguided.", "logic": "\nCorrelate(maurene)\nMistreat(maurene, kynthia)\nMistreat(kynthia, maurene)\nDisregard(kynthia, doroteya)\nPerfumed(doroteya)\nMistreat(doroteya, kynthia)\nForge(doroteya, maurene)\nforall x (Forge(x, doroteya) -> not Disregard(doroteya, kynthia))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, maurene) -> Correlate(maurene))\nforall x (Disregard(x, kynthia) -> Unguided(x))\nforall x (Disregard(x, doroteya) -> Disregard(doroteya, maurene))\nforall x (Unguided(x) -> Mistreat(x, kynthia))\nDisregard(doroteya, maurene) -> Disregard(maurene, kynthia)\nforall x (Disregard(x, doroteya) -> Mistreat(x, maurene))\nforall x (Disregard(x, maurene) -> not Disregard(x, kynthia))\n\nUnguided(maurene)\n\nDisregard(kynthia, doroteya) and forall x (Disregard(x, doroteya) -> Disregard(doroteya, maurene)) -> therefore Disregard(doroteya, maurene) Disregard(doroteya, maurene) and Disregard(doroteya, maurene) -> Disregard(maurene, kynthia) -> therefore Disregard(maurene, kynthia) Disregard(maurene, kynthia) and forall x (Disregard(x, kynthia) -> Unguided(x)) -> therefore Unguided(maurene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The stillmann is tiresome. The stillmann band the dalila. The dalila band the stillmann. The dalila fray the roderick. The roderick is heliacal. The roderick band the dalila. The roderick illuminate the stillmann. If something illuminate the roderick then the roderick does not visit the dalila. If something band the stillmann then the stillmann is tiresome. If something fray the dalila then it is unspoilt. If something fray the roderick then the roderick fray the stillmann. If something is unspoilt then it band the dalila. If the roderick fray the stillmann then the stillmann fray the dalila. If something fray the roderick then it band the stillmann. If something fray the stillmann then it does not visit the dalila. The stillmann is not unspoilt.", "logic": "\nTiresome(stillmann)\nBand(stillmann, dalila)\nBand(dalila, stillmann)\nFray(dalila, roderick)\nHeliacal(roderick)\nBand(roderick, dalila)\nIlluminate(roderick, stillmann)\nforall x (Illuminate(x, roderick) -> not Fray(roderick, dalila))\nforall x (Band(x, stillmann) -> Tiresome(stillmann))\nforall x (Fray(x, dalila) -> Unspoilt(x))\nforall x (Fray(x, roderick) -> Fray(roderick, stillmann))\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) -> Band(x, dalila))\nFray(roderick, stillmann) -> Fray(stillmann, dalila)\nforall x (Fray(x, roderick) -> Band(x, stillmann))\nforall x (Fray(x, stillmann) -> not Fray(x, dalila))\n\nnot Unspoilt(stillmann)\n\nFray(dalila, roderick) and forall x (Fray(x, roderick) -> Fray(roderick, stillmann)) -> therefore Fray(roderick, stillmann) Fray(roderick, stillmann) and Fray(roderick, stillmann) -> Fray(stillmann, dalila) -> therefore Fray(stillmann, dalila) Fray(stillmann, dalila) and forall x (Fray(x, dalila) -> Unspoilt(x)) -> therefore Unspoilt(stillmann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The lenard is unbowed. The lenard destain the annice. The annice destain the lenard. The annice parallel the newton. The newton is oaken. The newton destain the annice. The newton consent the lenard. If something consent the newton then the newton does not visit the annice. If something destain the lenard then the lenard is unbowed. If something parallel the annice then it is posterior. If something parallel the newton then the newton parallel the lenard. If something is posterior then it destain the annice. If the newton parallel the lenard then the lenard parallel the annice. If something parallel the newton then it destain the lenard. If something parallel the lenard then it does not visit the annice. The annice does not need the annice.", "logic": "\nUnbowed(lenard)\nDestain(lenard, annice)\nDestain(annice, lenard)\nParallel(annice, newton)\nOaken(newton)\nDestain(newton, annice)\nConsent(newton, lenard)\nforall x (Consent(x, newton) -> not Parallel(newton, annice))\nforall x (Destain(x, lenard) -> Unbowed(lenard))\nforall x (Parallel(x, annice) -> Posterior(x))\nforall x (Parallel(x, newton) -> Parallel(newton, lenard))\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Destain(x, annice))\nParallel(newton, lenard) -> Parallel(lenard, annice)\nforall x (Parallel(x, newton) -> Destain(x, lenard))\nforall x (Parallel(x, lenard) -> not Parallel(x, annice))\n\nnot Destain(annice, annice)\n\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Destain(x, annice)) <- forall x (Parallel(x, annice) -> Posterior(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The pollyanna is zonary. The pollyanna resplend the dyan. The dyan resplend the pollyanna. The dyan reassert the hamel. The hamel is adjectival. The hamel resplend the dyan. The hamel frizzle the pollyanna. If something frizzle the hamel then the hamel does not visit the dyan. If something resplend the pollyanna then the pollyanna is zonary. If something reassert the dyan then it is glassy. If something reassert the hamel then the hamel reassert the pollyanna. If something is glassy then it resplend the dyan. If the hamel reassert the pollyanna then the pollyanna reassert the dyan. If something reassert the hamel then it resplend the pollyanna. If something reassert the pollyanna then it does not visit the dyan. The hamel resplend the pollyanna.", "logic": "\nZonary(pollyanna)\nResplend(pollyanna, dyan)\nResplend(dyan, pollyanna)\nReassert(dyan, hamel)\nAdjectival(hamel)\nResplend(hamel, dyan)\nFrizzle(hamel, pollyanna)\nforall x (Frizzle(x, hamel) -> not Reassert(hamel, dyan))\nforall x (Resplend(x, pollyanna) -> Zonary(pollyanna))\nforall x (Reassert(x, dyan) -> Glassy(x))\nforall x (Reassert(x, hamel) -> Reassert(hamel, pollyanna))\nforall x (Glassy(x) -> Resplend(x, dyan))\nReassert(hamel, pollyanna) -> Reassert(pollyanna, dyan)\nforall x (Reassert(x, hamel) -> Resplend(x, pollyanna))\nforall x (Reassert(x, pollyanna) -> not Reassert(x, dyan))\n\nResplend(hamel, pollyanna)\n\nforall x (Reassert(x, hamel) -> Resplend(x, pollyanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The pepe is lidded. The pepe plash the douggie. The douggie plash the pepe. The douggie recharge the leonanie. The leonanie is icky. The leonanie plash the douggie. The leonanie overclothe the pepe. If something overclothe the leonanie then the leonanie does not visit the douggie. If something plash the pepe then the pepe is lidded. If something recharge the douggie then it is marbled. If something recharge the leonanie then the leonanie recharge the pepe. If something is marbled then it plash the douggie. If the leonanie recharge the pepe then the pepe recharge the douggie. If something recharge the leonanie then it plash the pepe. If something recharge the pepe then it does not visit the douggie. The douggie is not marbled.", "logic": "\nLidded(pepe)\nPlash(pepe, douggie)\nPlash(douggie, pepe)\nRecharge(douggie, leonanie)\nIcky(leonanie)\nPlash(leonanie, douggie)\nOverclothe(leonanie, pepe)\nforall x (Overclothe(x, leonanie) -> not Recharge(leonanie, douggie))\nforall x (Plash(x, pepe) -> Lidded(pepe))\nforall x (Recharge(x, douggie) -> Marbled(x))\nforall x (Recharge(x, leonanie) -> Recharge(leonanie, pepe))\nforall x (Marbled(x) -> Plash(x, douggie))\nRecharge(leonanie, pepe) -> Recharge(pepe, douggie)\nforall x (Recharge(x, leonanie) -> Plash(x, pepe))\nforall x (Recharge(x, pepe) -> not Recharge(x, douggie))\n\nnot Marbled(douggie)\n\nforall x (Recharge(x, douggie) -> Marbled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The joanne is uphill. The joanne reach the ernesto. The ernesto reach the joanne. The ernesto emblazon the alia. The alia is buffeted. The alia reach the ernesto. The alia fork the joanne. If something fork the alia then the alia does not visit the ernesto. If something reach the joanne then the joanne is uphill. If something emblazon the ernesto then it is scrotal. If something emblazon the alia then the alia emblazon the joanne. If something is scrotal then it reach the ernesto. If the alia emblazon the joanne then the joanne emblazon the ernesto. If something emblazon the alia then it reach the joanne. If something emblazon the joanne then it does not visit the ernesto. The alia is scrotal.", "logic": "\nUphill(joanne)\nReach(joanne, ernesto)\nReach(ernesto, joanne)\nEmblazon(ernesto, alia)\nBuffeted(alia)\nReach(alia, ernesto)\nFork(alia, joanne)\nforall x (Fork(x, alia) -> not Emblazon(alia, ernesto))\nforall x (Reach(x, joanne) -> Uphill(joanne))\nforall x (Emblazon(x, ernesto) -> Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Emblazon(x, alia) -> Emblazon(alia, joanne))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) -> Reach(x, ernesto))\nEmblazon(alia, joanne) -> Emblazon(joanne, ernesto)\nforall x (Emblazon(x, alia) -> Reach(x, joanne))\nforall x (Emblazon(x, joanne) -> not Emblazon(x, ernesto))\n\nScrotal(alia)\n\nforall x (Emblazon(x, ernesto) -> Scrotal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The carlos is winking. The carlos mollify the torin. The torin mollify the carlos. The torin skydive the tessie. The tessie is bigmouthed. The tessie mollify the torin. The tessie snoop the carlos. If something snoop the tessie then the tessie does not visit the torin. If something mollify the carlos then the carlos is winking. If something skydive the torin then it is southmost. If something skydive the tessie then the tessie skydive the carlos. If something is southmost then it mollify the torin. If the tessie skydive the carlos then the carlos skydive the torin. If something skydive the tessie then it mollify the carlos. If something skydive the carlos then it does not visit the torin. The tessie does not see the torin.", "logic": "\nWinking(carlos)\nMollify(carlos, torin)\nMollify(torin, carlos)\nSkydive(torin, tessie)\nBigmouthed(tessie)\nMollify(tessie, torin)\nSnoop(tessie, carlos)\nforall x (Snoop(x, tessie) -> not Skydive(tessie, torin))\nforall x (Mollify(x, carlos) -> Winking(carlos))\nforall x (Skydive(x, torin) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Skydive(x, tessie) -> Skydive(tessie, carlos))\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> Mollify(x, torin))\nSkydive(tessie, carlos) -> Skydive(carlos, torin)\nforall x (Skydive(x, tessie) -> Mollify(x, carlos))\nforall x (Skydive(x, carlos) -> not Skydive(x, torin))\n\nnot Snoop(tessie, torin)\n\nnot Snoop(tessie, torin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The leda is dormy. The leda rotate the upton. The upton rotate the leda. The upton knight the ewan. The ewan is squinty. The ewan rotate the upton. The ewan teem the leda. If something teem the ewan then the ewan does not visit the upton. If something rotate the leda then the leda is dormy. If something knight the upton then it is bottomless. If something knight the ewan then the ewan knight the leda. If something is bottomless then it rotate the upton. If the ewan knight the leda then the leda knight the upton. If something knight the ewan then it rotate the leda. If something knight the leda then it does not visit the upton. The ewan knight the ewan.", "logic": "\nDormy(leda)\nRotate(leda, upton)\nRotate(upton, leda)\nKnight(upton, ewan)\nSquinty(ewan)\nRotate(ewan, upton)\nTeem(ewan, leda)\nforall x (Teem(x, ewan) -> not Knight(ewan, upton))\nforall x (Rotate(x, leda) -> Dormy(leda))\nforall x (Knight(x, upton) -> Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Knight(x, ewan) -> Knight(ewan, leda))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) -> Rotate(x, upton))\nKnight(ewan, leda) -> Knight(leda, upton)\nforall x (Knight(x, ewan) -> Rotate(x, leda))\nforall x (Knight(x, leda) -> not Knight(x, upton))\n\nKnight(ewan, ewan)\n\nKnight(ewan, ewan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The erich is allargando. The erich cement the weylin. The weylin cement the erich. The weylin fossilise the meghann. The meghann is harmonious. The meghann cement the weylin. The meghann hope the erich. If something hope the meghann then the meghann does not visit the weylin. If something cement the erich then the erich is allargando. If something fossilise the weylin then it is virtuous. If something fossilise the meghann then the meghann fossilise the erich. If something is virtuous then it cement the weylin. If the meghann fossilise the erich then the erich fossilise the weylin. If something fossilise the meghann then it cement the erich. If something fossilise the erich then it does not visit the weylin. The erich is not harmonious.", "logic": "\nAllargando(erich)\nCement(erich, weylin)\nCement(weylin, erich)\nFossilise(weylin, meghann)\nHarmonious(meghann)\nCement(meghann, weylin)\nHope(meghann, erich)\nforall x (Hope(x, meghann) -> not Fossilise(meghann, weylin))\nforall x (Cement(x, erich) -> Allargando(erich))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, weylin) -> Virtuous(x))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, meghann) -> Fossilise(meghann, erich))\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Cement(x, weylin))\nFossilise(meghann, erich) -> Fossilise(erich, weylin)\nforall x (Fossilise(x, meghann) -> Cement(x, erich))\nforall x (Fossilise(x, erich) -> not Fossilise(x, weylin))\n\nnot Harmonious(erich)\n\nnot Harmonious(erich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The daryle is rueful. The daryle afforest the katalin. The katalin afforest the daryle. The katalin rile the gladis. The gladis is fourhanded. The gladis afforest the katalin. The gladis route the daryle. If something route the gladis then the gladis does not visit the katalin. If something afforest the daryle then the daryle is rueful. If something rile the katalin then it is outre. If something rile the gladis then the gladis rile the daryle. If something is outre then it afforest the katalin. If the gladis rile the daryle then the daryle rile the katalin. If something rile the gladis then it afforest the daryle. If something rile the daryle then it does not visit the katalin. The katalin route the gladis.", "logic": "\nRueful(daryle)\nAfforest(daryle, katalin)\nAfforest(katalin, daryle)\nRile(katalin, gladis)\nFourhanded(gladis)\nAfforest(gladis, katalin)\nRoute(gladis, daryle)\nforall x (Route(x, gladis) -> not Rile(gladis, katalin))\nforall x (Afforest(x, daryle) -> Rueful(daryle))\nforall x (Rile(x, katalin) -> Outre(x))\nforall x (Rile(x, gladis) -> Rile(gladis, daryle))\nforall x (Outre(x) -> Afforest(x, katalin))\nRile(gladis, daryle) -> Rile(daryle, katalin)\nforall x (Rile(x, gladis) -> Afforest(x, daryle))\nforall x (Rile(x, daryle) -> not Rile(x, katalin))\n\nRoute(katalin, gladis)\n\nRoute(katalin, gladis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The heda riposte the fleur. The allah backlog the fleur. The gelya riposte the heda. The fleur disgorge the allah. If something disgorge the fleur then the fleur riposte the gelya. If something is vaporific then it riposte the allah. If something backlog the gelya and it riposte the fleur then it riposte the allah. All obsessive things are matured. If something disgorge the fleur then the fleur riposte the allah. If the allah is obsessive then the allah disgorge the heda. The fleur disgorge the allah.", "logic": "\nRiposte(heda, fleur)\nBacklog(allah, fleur)\nRiposte(gelya, heda)\nDisgorge(fleur, allah)\nforall x (Disgorge(x, fleur) -> Riposte(fleur, gelya))\nforall x (Vaporific(x) -> Riposte(x, allah))\nforall x (Backlog(x, gelya) and Riposte(x, fleur) -> Riposte(x, allah))\nforall x (Obsessive(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Disgorge(x, fleur) -> Riposte(fleur, allah))\nObsessive(allah) -> Disgorge(allah, heda)\n\nDisgorge(fleur, allah)\n\ntherefore Disgorge(fleur, allah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3825"} {"premises": "The barnabe overcharge the brett. The stanford lessen the brett. The ioana overcharge the barnabe. The brett infatuate the stanford. If something infatuate the brett then the brett overcharge the ioana. If something is transitory then it overcharge the stanford. If something lessen the ioana and it overcharge the brett then it overcharge the stanford. All diverted things are unsoluble. If something infatuate the brett then the brett overcharge the stanford. If the stanford is diverted then the stanford infatuate the barnabe. The barnabe does not need the brett.", "logic": "\nOvercharge(barnabe, brett)\nLessen(stanford, brett)\nOvercharge(ioana, barnabe)\nInfatuate(brett, stanford)\nforall x (Infatuate(x, brett) -> Overcharge(brett, ioana))\nforall x (Transitory(x) -> Overcharge(x, stanford))\nforall x (Lessen(x, ioana) and Overcharge(x, brett) -> Overcharge(x, stanford))\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Unsoluble(x))\nforall x (Infatuate(x, brett) -> Overcharge(brett, stanford))\nDiverted(stanford) -> Infatuate(stanford, barnabe)\n\nnot Overcharge(barnabe, brett)\n\ntherefore Overcharge(barnabe, brett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3825"} {"premises": "The blinny ensue the rici. The merralee elucidate the rici. The juli ensue the blinny. The rici premiere the merralee. If something premiere the rici then the rici ensue the juli. If something is malaysian then it ensue the merralee. If something elucidate the juli and it ensue the rici then it ensue the merralee. All yankee things are milkless. If something premiere the rici then the rici ensue the merralee. If the merralee is yankee then the merralee premiere the blinny. The juli does not need the merralee.", "logic": "\nEnsue(blinny, rici)\nElucidate(merralee, rici)\nEnsue(juli, blinny)\nPremiere(rici, merralee)\nforall x (Premiere(x, rici) -> Ensue(rici, juli))\nforall x (Malaysian(x) -> Ensue(x, merralee))\nforall x (Elucidate(x, juli) and Ensue(x, rici) -> Ensue(x, merralee))\nforall x (Yankee(x) -> Milkless(x))\nforall x (Premiere(x, rici) -> Ensue(rici, merralee))\nYankee(merralee) -> Premiere(merralee, blinny)\n\nnot Ensue(juli, merralee)\n\nforall x (Malaysian(x) -> Ensue(x, merralee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3825"} {"premises": "The bubba perjure the ulick. The carie wear the ulick. The nolan perjure the bubba. The ulick dehorn the carie. If something dehorn the ulick then the ulick perjure the nolan. If something is resonating then it perjure the carie. If something wear the nolan and it perjure the ulick then it perjure the carie. All contained things are unnotched. If something dehorn the ulick then the ulick perjure the carie. If the carie is contained then the carie dehorn the bubba. The nolan perjure the nolan.", "logic": "\nPerjure(bubba, ulick)\nWear(carie, ulick)\nPerjure(nolan, bubba)\nDehorn(ulick, carie)\nforall x (Dehorn(x, ulick) -> Perjure(ulick, nolan))\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Perjure(x, carie))\nforall x (Wear(x, nolan) and Perjure(x, ulick) -> Perjure(x, carie))\nforall x (Contained(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Dehorn(x, ulick) -> Perjure(ulick, carie))\nContained(carie) -> Dehorn(carie, bubba)\n\nPerjure(nolan, nolan)\n\nPerjure(nolan, nolan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3825"} {"premises": "Kial is viviparous. All latter, lusty things are not heraldist. All viviparous things are heraldist. All heraldist, latter things are not collegiate. If something is heraldist then it is not lusty. If Kial is lusty then Kial is not scriptural. If Kial is not lusty then Kial is collegiate. If something is heraldist and viviparous then it is not unreported. If something is scriptural and not collegiate then it is unreported. Kial is viviparous.", "logic": "\nViviparous(kial)\nforall x (Latter(x) and Lusty(x) -> not Heraldist(x))\nforall x (Viviparous(x) -> Heraldist(x))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) and Latter(x) -> not Collegiate(x))\nforall x (Heraldist(x) -> not Lusty(x))\nLusty(kial) -> not Scriptural(kial)\nnot Lusty(kial) -> Collegiate(kial)\nforall x (Heraldist(x) and Viviparous(x) -> not Unreported(x))\nforall x (Scriptural(x) and not Collegiate(x) -> Unreported(x))\n\nViviparous(kial)\n\ntherefore Viviparous(kial)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Andonis is famous. All tiptoe, apart things are not plaguy. All famous things are plaguy. All plaguy, tiptoe things are not magnified. If something is plaguy then it is not apart. If Andonis is apart then Andonis is not arbitral. If Andonis is not apart then Andonis is magnified. If something is plaguy and famous then it is not festive. If something is arbitral and not magnified then it is festive. Andonis is not famous.", "logic": "\nFamous(andonis)\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) and Apart(x) -> not Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Famous(x) -> Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and Tiptoe(x) -> not Magnified(x))\nforall x (Plaguy(x) -> not Apart(x))\nApart(andonis) -> not Arbitral(andonis)\nnot Apart(andonis) -> Magnified(andonis)\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and Famous(x) -> not Festive(x))\nforall x (Arbitral(x) and not Magnified(x) -> Festive(x))\n\nnot Famous(andonis)\n\ntherefore Famous(andonis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Bertine is frontal. All lowering, hindering things are not excited. All frontal things are excited. All excited, lowering things are not jungly. If something is excited then it is not hindering. If Bertine is hindering then Bertine is not lordless. If Bertine is not hindering then Bertine is jungly. If something is excited and frontal then it is not novel. If something is lordless and not jungly then it is novel. Bertine is excited.", "logic": "\nFrontal(bertine)\nforall x (Lowering(x) and Hindering(x) -> not Excited(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) -> Excited(x))\nforall x (Excited(x) and Lowering(x) -> not Jungly(x))\nforall x (Excited(x) -> not Hindering(x))\nHindering(bertine) -> not Lordless(bertine)\nnot Hindering(bertine) -> Jungly(bertine)\nforall x (Excited(x) and Frontal(x) -> not Novel(x))\nforall x (Lordless(x) and not Jungly(x) -> Novel(x))\n\nExcited(bertine)\n\nFrontal(bertine) and forall x (Frontal(x) -> Excited(x)) -> therefore Excited(bertine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Chrissa is catchpenny. All wellborn, subgross things are not protective. All catchpenny things are protective. All protective, wellborn things are not catchpenny. If something is protective then it is not subgross. If Chrissa is subgross then Chrissa is not morphemic. If Chrissa is not subgross then Chrissa is catchpenny. If something is protective and catchpenny then it is not leisurely. If something is morphemic and not catchpenny then it is leisurely. Chrissa is not protective.", "logic": "\nCatchpenny(chrissa)\nforall x (Wellborn(x) and Subgross(x) -> not Protective(x))\nforall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Protective(x))\nforall x (Protective(x) and Wellborn(x) -> not Catchpenny(x))\nforall x (Protective(x) -> not Subgross(x))\nSubgross(chrissa) -> not Morphemic(chrissa)\nnot Subgross(chrissa) -> Catchpenny(chrissa)\nforall x (Protective(x) and Catchpenny(x) -> not Leisurely(x))\nforall x (Morphemic(x) and not Catchpenny(x) -> Leisurely(x))\n\nnot Protective(chrissa)\n\nCatchpenny(chrissa) and forall x (Catchpenny(x) -> Protective(x)) -> therefore Protective(chrissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Vito is twiglike. All hazardous, protean things are not senescent. All twiglike things are senescent. All senescent, hazardous things are not cyprinid. If something is senescent then it is not protean. If Vito is protean then Vito is not dividable. If Vito is not protean then Vito is cyprinid. If something is senescent and twiglike then it is not sparse. If something is dividable and not cyprinid then it is sparse. Vito is not sparse.", "logic": "\nTwiglike(vito)\nforall x (Hazardous(x) and Protean(x) -> not Senescent(x))\nforall x (Twiglike(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Hazardous(x) -> not Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> not Protean(x))\nProtean(vito) -> not Dividable(vito)\nnot Protean(vito) -> Cyprinid(vito)\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Twiglike(x) -> not Sparse(x))\nforall x (Dividable(x) and not Cyprinid(x) -> Sparse(x))\n\nnot Sparse(vito)\n\nTwiglike(vito) and forall x (Twiglike(x) -> Senescent(x)) -> therefore Senescent(vito) Senescent(vito) and Twiglike(vito) and forall x (Senescent(x) and Twiglike(x) -> not Sparse(x)) -> therefore not Sparse(vito)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Elianora is regimented. All grimy, aphotic things are not unranked. All regimented things are unranked. All unranked, grimy things are not catalan. If something is unranked then it is not aphotic. If Elianora is aphotic then Elianora is not refreshing. If Elianora is not aphotic then Elianora is catalan. If something is unranked and regimented then it is not developed. If something is refreshing and not catalan then it is developed. Elianora is aphotic.", "logic": "\nRegimented(elianora)\nforall x (Grimy(x) and Aphotic(x) -> not Unranked(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Unranked(x))\nforall x (Unranked(x) and Grimy(x) -> not Catalan(x))\nforall x (Unranked(x) -> not Aphotic(x))\nAphotic(elianora) -> not Refreshing(elianora)\nnot Aphotic(elianora) -> Catalan(elianora)\nforall x (Unranked(x) and Regimented(x) -> not Developed(x))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and not Catalan(x) -> Developed(x))\n\nAphotic(elianora)\n\nRegimented(elianora) and forall x (Regimented(x) -> Unranked(x)) -> therefore Unranked(elianora) Unranked(elianora) and forall x (Unranked(x) -> not Aphotic(x)) -> therefore not Aphotic(elianora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Donald is palatal. All masterful, dissonant things are not unworkable. All palatal things are unworkable. All unworkable, masterful things are not unfearing. If something is unworkable then it is not dissonant. If Donald is dissonant then Donald is not unexcelled. If Donald is not dissonant then Donald is unfearing. If something is unworkable and palatal then it is not alabaster. If something is unexcelled and not unfearing then it is alabaster. Donald is unfearing.", "logic": "\nPalatal(donald)\nforall x (Masterful(x) and Dissonant(x) -> not Unworkable(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> Unworkable(x))\nforall x (Unworkable(x) and Masterful(x) -> not Unfearing(x))\nforall x (Unworkable(x) -> not Dissonant(x))\nDissonant(donald) -> not Unexcelled(donald)\nnot Dissonant(donald) -> Unfearing(donald)\nforall x (Unworkable(x) and Palatal(x) -> not Alabaster(x))\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) and not Unfearing(x) -> Alabaster(x))\n\nUnfearing(donald)\n\nPalatal(donald) and forall x (Palatal(x) -> Unworkable(x)) -> therefore Unworkable(donald) Unworkable(donald) and forall x (Unworkable(x) -> not Dissonant(x)) -> therefore not Dissonant(donald) not Dissonant(donald) and not Dissonant(donald) -> Unfearing(donald) -> therefore Unfearing(donald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Terza is nebular. All coroneted, coral things are not lucid. All nebular things are lucid. All lucid, coroneted things are not macerative. If something is lucid then it is not coral. If Terza is coral then Terza is not shorthand. If Terza is not coral then Terza is macerative. If something is lucid and nebular then it is not meek. If something is shorthand and not macerative then it is meek. Terza is not macerative.", "logic": "\nNebular(terza)\nforall x (Coroneted(x) and Coral(x) -> not Lucid(x))\nforall x (Nebular(x) -> Lucid(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) and Coroneted(x) -> not Macerative(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) -> not Coral(x))\nCoral(terza) -> not Shorthand(terza)\nnot Coral(terza) -> Macerative(terza)\nforall x (Lucid(x) and Nebular(x) -> not Meek(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and not Macerative(x) -> Meek(x))\n\nnot Macerative(terza)\n\nNebular(terza) and forall x (Nebular(x) -> Lucid(x)) -> therefore Lucid(terza) Lucid(terza) and forall x (Lucid(x) -> not Coral(x)) -> therefore not Coral(terza) not Coral(terza) and not Coral(terza) -> Macerative(terza) -> therefore Macerative(terza)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Tandie is subdued. All riming, kinetic things are not refreshing. All subdued things are refreshing. All refreshing, riming things are not finical. If something is refreshing then it is not kinetic. If Tandie is kinetic then Tandie is not bodily. If Tandie is not kinetic then Tandie is finical. If something is refreshing and subdued then it is not arachnoid. If something is bodily and not finical then it is arachnoid. Tandie is not bodily.", "logic": "\nSubdued(tandie)\nforall x (Riming(x) and Kinetic(x) -> not Refreshing(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Refreshing(x))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and Riming(x) -> not Finical(x))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) -> not Kinetic(x))\nKinetic(tandie) -> not Bodily(tandie)\nnot Kinetic(tandie) -> Finical(tandie)\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and Subdued(x) -> not Arachnoid(x))\nforall x (Bodily(x) and not Finical(x) -> Arachnoid(x))\n\nnot Bodily(tandie)\n\nnot Bodily(tandie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "Brett is geodetic. All corsican, memorable things are not sacked. All geodetic things are sacked. All sacked, corsican things are not canonical. If something is sacked then it is not memorable. If Brett is memorable then Brett is not binucleate. If Brett is not memorable then Brett is canonical. If something is sacked and geodetic then it is not guinean. If something is binucleate and not canonical then it is guinean. Brett is corsican.", "logic": "\nGeodetic(brett)\nforall x (Corsican(x) and Memorable(x) -> not Sacked(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> Sacked(x))\nforall x (Sacked(x) and Corsican(x) -> not Canonical(x))\nforall x (Sacked(x) -> not Memorable(x))\nMemorable(brett) -> not Binucleate(brett)\nnot Memorable(brett) -> Canonical(brett)\nforall x (Sacked(x) and Geodetic(x) -> not Guinean(x))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) and not Canonical(x) -> Guinean(x))\n\nCorsican(brett)\n\nCorsican(brett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1066"} {"premises": "The robina is not canonic. The robina muckrake the guy. The robina does not see the rubi. The guy is nibbed. The rubi is palatial. The rubi is rotund. The rubi muckrake the robina. If something muckrake the guy then the guy yawp the rubi. If something is nibbed then it yawp the guy. If the guy is nibbed then the guy is not canonic. If something is standpat and not rotund then it does not see the robina. If something is canonic and it muckrake the rubi then the rubi yawp the guy. If something yawp the rubi and it is not canonic then the rubi enumerate the guy. If something enumerate the guy then it muckrake the robina. If something enumerate the guy and the guy is nibbed then the guy does not like the robina. The guy is nibbed.", "logic": "\nnot Canonic(robina)\nMuckrake(robina, guy)\nnot Enumerate(robina, rubi)\nNibbed(guy)\nPalatial(rubi)\nRotund(rubi)\nMuckrake(rubi, robina)\nforall x (Muckrake(x, guy) -> Yawp(guy, rubi))\nforall x (Nibbed(x) -> Yawp(x, guy))\nNibbed(guy) -> not Canonic(guy)\nforall x (Standpat(x) and not Rotund(x) -> not Enumerate(x, robina))\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Muckrake(x, rubi) -> Yawp(rubi, guy))\nforall x (Yawp(x, rubi) and not Canonic(x) -> Enumerate(rubi, guy))\nforall x (Enumerate(x, guy) -> Muckrake(x, robina))\nforall x (Enumerate(x, guy) and Nibbed(guy) -> not Muckrake(guy, robina))\n\nNibbed(guy)\n\ntherefore Nibbed(guy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The elliott is not xeric. The elliott swage the aharon. The elliott does not see the corissa. The aharon is raptorial. The corissa is banausic. The corissa is leafless. The corissa swage the elliott. If something swage the aharon then the aharon nasale the corissa. If something is raptorial then it nasale the aharon. If the aharon is raptorial then the aharon is not xeric. If something is airlike and not leafless then it does not see the elliott. If something is xeric and it swage the corissa then the corissa nasale the aharon. If something nasale the corissa and it is not xeric then the corissa seep the aharon. If something seep the aharon then it swage the elliott. If something seep the aharon and the aharon is raptorial then the aharon does not like the elliott. The elliott seep the corissa.", "logic": "\nnot Xeric(elliott)\nSwage(elliott, aharon)\nnot Seep(elliott, corissa)\nRaptorial(aharon)\nBanausic(corissa)\nLeafless(corissa)\nSwage(corissa, elliott)\nforall x (Swage(x, aharon) -> Nasale(aharon, corissa))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) -> Nasale(x, aharon))\nRaptorial(aharon) -> not Xeric(aharon)\nforall x (Airlike(x) and not Leafless(x) -> not Seep(x, elliott))\nforall x (Xeric(x) and Swage(x, corissa) -> Nasale(corissa, aharon))\nforall x (Nasale(x, corissa) and not Xeric(x) -> Seep(corissa, aharon))\nforall x (Seep(x, aharon) -> Swage(x, elliott))\nforall x (Seep(x, aharon) and Raptorial(aharon) -> not Swage(aharon, elliott))\n\nSeep(elliott, corissa)\n\ntherefore not Seep(elliott, corissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The judas is not fulgurant. The judas creak the jaquelyn. The judas does not see the winthrop. The jaquelyn is monoecious. The winthrop is animistic. The winthrop is eventful. The winthrop creak the judas. If something creak the jaquelyn then the jaquelyn shore the winthrop. If something is monoecious then it shore the jaquelyn. If the jaquelyn is monoecious then the jaquelyn is not fulgurant. If something is fore and not eventful then it does not see the judas. If something is fulgurant and it creak the winthrop then the winthrop shore the jaquelyn. If something shore the winthrop and it is not fulgurant then the winthrop clamor the jaquelyn. If something clamor the jaquelyn then it creak the judas. If something clamor the jaquelyn and the jaquelyn is monoecious then the jaquelyn does not like the judas. The jaquelyn is not fulgurant.", "logic": "\nnot Fulgurant(judas)\nCreak(judas, jaquelyn)\nnot Clamor(judas, winthrop)\nMonoecious(jaquelyn)\nAnimistic(winthrop)\nEventful(winthrop)\nCreak(winthrop, judas)\nforall x (Creak(x, jaquelyn) -> Shore(jaquelyn, winthrop))\nforall x (Monoecious(x) -> Shore(x, jaquelyn))\nMonoecious(jaquelyn) -> not Fulgurant(jaquelyn)\nforall x (Fore(x) and not Eventful(x) -> not Clamor(x, judas))\nforall x (Fulgurant(x) and Creak(x, winthrop) -> Shore(winthrop, jaquelyn))\nforall x (Shore(x, winthrop) and not Fulgurant(x) -> Clamor(winthrop, jaquelyn))\nforall x (Clamor(x, jaquelyn) -> Creak(x, judas))\nforall x (Clamor(x, jaquelyn) and Monoecious(jaquelyn) -> not Creak(jaquelyn, judas))\n\nnot Fulgurant(jaquelyn)\n\nMonoecious(jaquelyn) and Monoecious(jaquelyn) -> not Fulgurant(jaquelyn) -> therefore not Fulgurant(jaquelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The tova is not voguish. The tova whizz the tanya. The tova does not see the shirlee. The tanya is assurgent. The shirlee is galling. The shirlee is unmown. The shirlee whizz the tova. If something whizz the tanya then the tanya suffice the shirlee. If something is assurgent then it suffice the tanya. If the tanya is assurgent then the tanya is not voguish. If something is subjective and not unmown then it does not see the tova. If something is voguish and it whizz the shirlee then the shirlee suffice the tanya. If something suffice the shirlee and it is not voguish then the shirlee spoof the tanya. If something spoof the tanya then it whizz the tova. If something spoof the tanya and the tanya is assurgent then the tanya does not like the tova. The tanya is voguish.", "logic": "\nnot Voguish(tova)\nWhizz(tova, tanya)\nnot Spoof(tova, shirlee)\nAssurgent(tanya)\nGalling(shirlee)\nUnmown(shirlee)\nWhizz(shirlee, tova)\nforall x (Whizz(x, tanya) -> Suffice(tanya, shirlee))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) -> Suffice(x, tanya))\nAssurgent(tanya) -> not Voguish(tanya)\nforall x (Subjective(x) and not Unmown(x) -> not Spoof(x, tova))\nforall x (Voguish(x) and Whizz(x, shirlee) -> Suffice(shirlee, tanya))\nforall x (Suffice(x, shirlee) and not Voguish(x) -> Spoof(shirlee, tanya))\nforall x (Spoof(x, tanya) -> Whizz(x, tova))\nforall x (Spoof(x, tanya) and Assurgent(tanya) -> not Whizz(tanya, tova))\n\nVoguish(tanya)\n\nAssurgent(tanya) and Assurgent(tanya) -> not Voguish(tanya) -> therefore not Voguish(tanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The elinore is not severable. The elinore fence the bronson. The elinore does not see the alameda. The bronson is crispate. The alameda is lobular. The alameda is permeating. The alameda fence the elinore. If something fence the bronson then the bronson drone the alameda. If something is crispate then it drone the bronson. If the bronson is crispate then the bronson is not severable. If something is daedal and not permeating then it does not see the elinore. If something is severable and it fence the alameda then the alameda drone the bronson. If something drone the alameda and it is not severable then the alameda croon the bronson. If something croon the bronson then it fence the elinore. If something croon the bronson and the bronson is crispate then the bronson does not like the elinore. The alameda croon the bronson.", "logic": "\nnot Severable(elinore)\nFence(elinore, bronson)\nnot Croon(elinore, alameda)\nCrispate(bronson)\nLobular(alameda)\nPermeating(alameda)\nFence(alameda, elinore)\nforall x (Fence(x, bronson) -> Drone(bronson, alameda))\nforall x (Crispate(x) -> Drone(x, bronson))\nCrispate(bronson) -> not Severable(bronson)\nforall x (Daedal(x) and not Permeating(x) -> not Croon(x, elinore))\nforall x (Severable(x) and Fence(x, alameda) -> Drone(alameda, bronson))\nforall x (Drone(x, alameda) and not Severable(x) -> Croon(alameda, bronson))\nforall x (Croon(x, bronson) -> Fence(x, elinore))\nforall x (Croon(x, bronson) and Crispate(bronson) -> not Fence(bronson, elinore))\n\nCroon(alameda, bronson)\n\nFence(elinore, bronson) and forall x (Fence(x, bronson) -> Drone(bronson, alameda)) -> therefore Drone(bronson, alameda) Crispate(bronson) and Crispate(bronson) -> not Severable(bronson) -> therefore not Severable(bronson) Drone(bronson, alameda) and not Severable(bronson) and forall x (Drone(x, alameda) and not Severable(x) -> Croon(alameda, bronson)) -> therefore Croon(alameda, bronson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The alvera is not succulent. The alvera mortice the rona. The alvera does not see the april. The rona is hoarse. The april is amateur. The april is converse. The april mortice the alvera. If something mortice the rona then the rona pray the april. If something is hoarse then it pray the rona. If the rona is hoarse then the rona is not succulent. If something is costal and not converse then it does not see the alvera. If something is succulent and it mortice the april then the april pray the rona. If something pray the april and it is not succulent then the april banish the rona. If something banish the rona then it mortice the alvera. If something banish the rona and the rona is hoarse then the rona does not like the alvera. The april does not see the rona.", "logic": "\nnot Succulent(alvera)\nMortice(alvera, rona)\nnot Banish(alvera, april)\nHoarse(rona)\nAmateur(april)\nConverse(april)\nMortice(april, alvera)\nforall x (Mortice(x, rona) -> Pray(rona, april))\nforall x (Hoarse(x) -> Pray(x, rona))\nHoarse(rona) -> not Succulent(rona)\nforall x (Costal(x) and not Converse(x) -> not Banish(x, alvera))\nforall x (Succulent(x) and Mortice(x, april) -> Pray(april, rona))\nforall x (Pray(x, april) and not Succulent(x) -> Banish(april, rona))\nforall x (Banish(x, rona) -> Mortice(x, alvera))\nforall x (Banish(x, rona) and Hoarse(rona) -> not Mortice(rona, alvera))\n\nnot Banish(april, rona)\n\nMortice(alvera, rona) and forall x (Mortice(x, rona) -> Pray(rona, april)) -> therefore Pray(rona, april) Hoarse(rona) and Hoarse(rona) -> not Succulent(rona) -> therefore not Succulent(rona) Pray(rona, april) and not Succulent(rona) and forall x (Pray(x, april) and not Succulent(x) -> Banish(april, rona)) -> therefore Banish(april, rona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The arther is not beaklike. The arther labour the juliet. The arther does not see the martino. The juliet is southward. The martino is elaborate. The martino is handwoven. The martino labour the arther. If something labour the juliet then the juliet refracture the martino. If something is southward then it refracture the juliet. If the juliet is southward then the juliet is not beaklike. If something is squab and not handwoven then it does not see the arther. If something is beaklike and it labour the martino then the martino refracture the juliet. If something refracture the martino and it is not beaklike then the martino tank the juliet. If something tank the juliet then it labour the arther. If something tank the juliet and the juliet is southward then the juliet does not like the arther. The juliet does not like the arther.", "logic": "\nnot Beaklike(arther)\nLabour(arther, juliet)\nnot Tank(arther, martino)\nSouthward(juliet)\nElaborate(martino)\nHandwoven(martino)\nLabour(martino, arther)\nforall x (Labour(x, juliet) -> Refracture(juliet, martino))\nforall x (Southward(x) -> Refracture(x, juliet))\nSouthward(juliet) -> not Beaklike(juliet)\nforall x (Squab(x) and not Handwoven(x) -> not Tank(x, arther))\nforall x (Beaklike(x) and Labour(x, martino) -> Refracture(martino, juliet))\nforall x (Refracture(x, martino) and not Beaklike(x) -> Tank(martino, juliet))\nforall x (Tank(x, juliet) -> Labour(x, arther))\nforall x (Tank(x, juliet) and Southward(juliet) -> not Labour(juliet, arther))\n\nnot Labour(juliet, arther)\n\nLabour(arther, juliet) and forall x (Labour(x, juliet) -> Refracture(juliet, martino)) -> therefore Refracture(juliet, martino) Southward(juliet) and Southward(juliet) -> not Beaklike(juliet) -> therefore not Beaklike(juliet) Refracture(juliet, martino) and not Beaklike(juliet) and forall x (Refracture(x, martino) and not Beaklike(x) -> Tank(martino, juliet)) -> therefore Tank(martino, juliet) Tank(martino, juliet) and Southward(juliet) and forall x (Tank(x, juliet) and Southward(juliet) -> not Labour(juliet, arther)) -> therefore not Labour(juliet, arther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The adaline is not aramaic. The adaline balk the misti. The adaline does not see the amber. The misti is sonsie. The amber is acicular. The amber is gracile. The amber balk the adaline. If something balk the misti then the misti trek the amber. If something is sonsie then it trek the misti. If the misti is sonsie then the misti is not aramaic. If something is large and not gracile then it does not see the adaline. If something is aramaic and it balk the amber then the amber trek the misti. If something trek the amber and it is not aramaic then the amber facilitate the misti. If something facilitate the misti then it balk the adaline. If something facilitate the misti and the misti is sonsie then the misti does not like the adaline. The misti balk the adaline.", "logic": "\nnot Aramaic(adaline)\nBalk(adaline, misti)\nnot Facilitate(adaline, amber)\nSonsie(misti)\nAcicular(amber)\nGracile(amber)\nBalk(amber, adaline)\nforall x (Balk(x, misti) -> Trek(misti, amber))\nforall x (Sonsie(x) -> Trek(x, misti))\nSonsie(misti) -> not Aramaic(misti)\nforall x (Large(x) and not Gracile(x) -> not Facilitate(x, adaline))\nforall x (Aramaic(x) and Balk(x, amber) -> Trek(amber, misti))\nforall x (Trek(x, amber) and not Aramaic(x) -> Facilitate(amber, misti))\nforall x (Facilitate(x, misti) -> Balk(x, adaline))\nforall x (Facilitate(x, misti) and Sonsie(misti) -> not Balk(misti, adaline))\n\nBalk(misti, adaline)\n\nBalk(adaline, misti) and forall x (Balk(x, misti) -> Trek(misti, amber)) -> therefore Trek(misti, amber) Sonsie(misti) and Sonsie(misti) -> not Aramaic(misti) -> therefore not Aramaic(misti) Trek(misti, amber) and not Aramaic(misti) and forall x (Trek(x, amber) and not Aramaic(x) -> Facilitate(amber, misti)) -> therefore Facilitate(amber, misti) Facilitate(amber, misti) and Sonsie(misti) and forall x (Facilitate(x, misti) and Sonsie(misti) -> not Balk(misti, adaline)) -> therefore not Balk(misti, adaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The stinky is not flustered. The stinky circuit the trace. The stinky does not see the leandra. The trace is travelled. The leandra is chaldee. The leandra is agreed. The leandra circuit the stinky. If something circuit the trace then the trace prepare the leandra. If something is travelled then it prepare the trace. If the trace is travelled then the trace is not flustered. If something is pubescent and not agreed then it does not see the stinky. If something is flustered and it circuit the leandra then the leandra prepare the trace. If something prepare the leandra and it is not flustered then the leandra etherify the trace. If something etherify the trace then it circuit the stinky. If something etherify the trace and the trace is travelled then the trace does not like the stinky. The stinky does not eat the trace.", "logic": "\nnot Flustered(stinky)\nCircuit(stinky, trace)\nnot Etherify(stinky, leandra)\nTravelled(trace)\nChaldee(leandra)\nAgreed(leandra)\nCircuit(leandra, stinky)\nforall x (Circuit(x, trace) -> Prepare(trace, leandra))\nforall x (Travelled(x) -> Prepare(x, trace))\nTravelled(trace) -> not Flustered(trace)\nforall x (Pubescent(x) and not Agreed(x) -> not Etherify(x, stinky))\nforall x (Flustered(x) and Circuit(x, leandra) -> Prepare(leandra, trace))\nforall x (Prepare(x, leandra) and not Flustered(x) -> Etherify(leandra, trace))\nforall x (Etherify(x, trace) -> Circuit(x, stinky))\nforall x (Etherify(x, trace) and Travelled(trace) -> not Circuit(trace, stinky))\n\nnot Prepare(stinky, trace)\n\nforall x (Travelled(x) -> Prepare(x, trace)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The harvey is not ungathered. The harvey overshoot the glory. The harvey does not see the kermit. The glory is local. The kermit is monaural. The kermit is inveterate. The kermit overshoot the harvey. If something overshoot the glory then the glory witness the kermit. If something is local then it witness the glory. If the glory is local then the glory is not ungathered. If something is pretorian and not inveterate then it does not see the harvey. If something is ungathered and it overshoot the kermit then the kermit witness the glory. If something witness the kermit and it is not ungathered then the kermit crump the glory. If something crump the glory then it overshoot the harvey. If something crump the glory and the glory is local then the glory does not like the harvey. The kermit witness the glory.", "logic": "\nnot Ungathered(harvey)\nOvershoot(harvey, glory)\nnot Crump(harvey, kermit)\nLocal(glory)\nMonaural(kermit)\nInveterate(kermit)\nOvershoot(kermit, harvey)\nforall x (Overshoot(x, glory) -> Witness(glory, kermit))\nforall x (Local(x) -> Witness(x, glory))\nLocal(glory) -> not Ungathered(glory)\nforall x (Pretorian(x) and not Inveterate(x) -> not Crump(x, harvey))\nforall x (Ungathered(x) and Overshoot(x, kermit) -> Witness(kermit, glory))\nforall x (Witness(x, kermit) and not Ungathered(x) -> Crump(kermit, glory))\nforall x (Crump(x, glory) -> Overshoot(x, harvey))\nforall x (Crump(x, glory) and Local(glory) -> not Overshoot(glory, harvey))\n\nWitness(kermit, glory)\n\nforall x (Local(x) -> Witness(x, glory)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The gwenneth is not mordant. The gwenneth tout the ginnifer. The gwenneth does not see the wallace. The ginnifer is expanded. The wallace is taliped. The wallace is thumbed. The wallace tout the gwenneth. If something tout the ginnifer then the ginnifer constrict the wallace. If something is expanded then it constrict the ginnifer. If the ginnifer is expanded then the ginnifer is not mordant. If something is abomasal and not thumbed then it does not see the gwenneth. If something is mordant and it tout the wallace then the wallace constrict the ginnifer. If something constrict the wallace and it is not mordant then the wallace sough the ginnifer. If something sough the ginnifer then it tout the gwenneth. If something sough the ginnifer and the ginnifer is expanded then the ginnifer does not like the gwenneth. The gwenneth does not like the gwenneth.", "logic": "\nnot Mordant(gwenneth)\nTout(gwenneth, ginnifer)\nnot Sough(gwenneth, wallace)\nExpanded(ginnifer)\nTaliped(wallace)\nThumbed(wallace)\nTout(wallace, gwenneth)\nforall x (Tout(x, ginnifer) -> Constrict(ginnifer, wallace))\nforall x (Expanded(x) -> Constrict(x, ginnifer))\nExpanded(ginnifer) -> not Mordant(ginnifer)\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and not Thumbed(x) -> not Sough(x, gwenneth))\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Tout(x, wallace) -> Constrict(wallace, ginnifer))\nforall x (Constrict(x, wallace) and not Mordant(x) -> Sough(wallace, ginnifer))\nforall x (Sough(x, ginnifer) -> Tout(x, gwenneth))\nforall x (Sough(x, ginnifer) and Expanded(ginnifer) -> not Tout(ginnifer, gwenneth))\n\nnot Tout(gwenneth, gwenneth)\n\nforall x (Sough(x, ginnifer) -> Tout(x, gwenneth)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The pail is not windless. The pail deride the sandie. The pail does not see the liorah. The sandie is vaginal. The liorah is uterine. The liorah is tearless. The liorah deride the pail. If something deride the sandie then the sandie shorten the liorah. If something is vaginal then it shorten the sandie. If the sandie is vaginal then the sandie is not windless. If something is chitinous and not tearless then it does not see the pail. If something is windless and it deride the liorah then the liorah shorten the sandie. If something shorten the liorah and it is not windless then the liorah wane the sandie. If something wane the sandie then it deride the pail. If something wane the sandie and the sandie is vaginal then the sandie does not like the pail. The sandie wane the pail.", "logic": "\nnot Windless(pail)\nDeride(pail, sandie)\nnot Wane(pail, liorah)\nVaginal(sandie)\nUterine(liorah)\nTearless(liorah)\nDeride(liorah, pail)\nforall x (Deride(x, sandie) -> Shorten(sandie, liorah))\nforall x (Vaginal(x) -> Shorten(x, sandie))\nVaginal(sandie) -> not Windless(sandie)\nforall x (Chitinous(x) and not Tearless(x) -> not Wane(x, pail))\nforall x (Windless(x) and Deride(x, liorah) -> Shorten(liorah, sandie))\nforall x (Shorten(x, liorah) and not Windless(x) -> Wane(liorah, sandie))\nforall x (Wane(x, sandie) -> Deride(x, pail))\nforall x (Wane(x, sandie) and Vaginal(sandie) -> not Deride(sandie, pail))\n\nWane(sandie, pail)\n\nWane(sandie, pail) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The nessy is not xxxiv. The nessy yodel the bess. The nessy does not see the alexei. The bess is servile. The alexei is ensuing. The alexei is nourished. The alexei yodel the nessy. If something yodel the bess then the bess pitchfork the alexei. If something is servile then it pitchfork the bess. If the bess is servile then the bess is not xxxiv. If something is lame and not nourished then it does not see the nessy. If something is xxxiv and it yodel the alexei then the alexei pitchfork the bess. If something pitchfork the alexei and it is not xxxiv then the alexei pile the bess. If something pile the bess then it yodel the nessy. If something pile the bess and the bess is servile then the bess does not like the nessy. The alexei does not see the nessy.", "logic": "\nnot Xxxiv(nessy)\nYodel(nessy, bess)\nnot Pile(nessy, alexei)\nServile(bess)\nEnsuing(alexei)\nNourished(alexei)\nYodel(alexei, nessy)\nforall x (Yodel(x, bess) -> Pitchfork(bess, alexei))\nforall x (Servile(x) -> Pitchfork(x, bess))\nServile(bess) -> not Xxxiv(bess)\nforall x (Lame(x) and not Nourished(x) -> not Pile(x, nessy))\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) and Yodel(x, alexei) -> Pitchfork(alexei, bess))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, alexei) and not Xxxiv(x) -> Pile(alexei, bess))\nforall x (Pile(x, bess) -> Yodel(x, nessy))\nforall x (Pile(x, bess) and Servile(bess) -> not Yodel(bess, nessy))\n\nnot Pile(alexei, nessy)\n\nnot Pile(alexei, nessy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The jamey is not millennial. The jamey uplift the evelina. The jamey does not see the jessamine. The evelina is hemal. The jessamine is stormproof. The jessamine is silklike. The jessamine uplift the jamey. If something uplift the evelina then the evelina blindside the jessamine. If something is hemal then it blindside the evelina. If the evelina is hemal then the evelina is not millennial. If something is ratable and not silklike then it does not see the jamey. If something is millennial and it uplift the jessamine then the jessamine blindside the evelina. If something blindside the jessamine and it is not millennial then the jessamine counter the evelina. If something counter the evelina then it uplift the jamey. If something counter the evelina and the evelina is hemal then the evelina does not like the jamey. The evelina is silklike.", "logic": "\nnot Millennial(jamey)\nUplift(jamey, evelina)\nnot Counter(jamey, jessamine)\nHemal(evelina)\nStormproof(jessamine)\nSilklike(jessamine)\nUplift(jessamine, jamey)\nforall x (Uplift(x, evelina) -> Blindside(evelina, jessamine))\nforall x (Hemal(x) -> Blindside(x, evelina))\nHemal(evelina) -> not Millennial(evelina)\nforall x (Ratable(x) and not Silklike(x) -> not Counter(x, jamey))\nforall x (Millennial(x) and Uplift(x, jessamine) -> Blindside(jessamine, evelina))\nforall x (Blindside(x, jessamine) and not Millennial(x) -> Counter(jessamine, evelina))\nforall x (Counter(x, evelina) -> Uplift(x, jamey))\nforall x (Counter(x, evelina) and Hemal(evelina) -> not Uplift(evelina, jamey))\n\nSilklike(evelina)\n\nSilklike(evelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The kali is not gold. The kali recognise the ephrem. The kali does not see the betteanne. The ephrem is riddled. The betteanne is satellite. The betteanne is tenderized. The betteanne recognise the kali. If something recognise the ephrem then the ephrem gage the betteanne. If something is riddled then it gage the ephrem. If the ephrem is riddled then the ephrem is not gold. If something is unedifying and not tenderized then it does not see the kali. If something is gold and it recognise the betteanne then the betteanne gage the ephrem. If something gage the betteanne and it is not gold then the betteanne reelect the ephrem. If something reelect the ephrem then it recognise the kali. If something reelect the ephrem and the ephrem is riddled then the ephrem does not like the kali. The ephrem does not eat the kali.", "logic": "\nnot Gold(kali)\nRecognise(kali, ephrem)\nnot Reelect(kali, betteanne)\nRiddled(ephrem)\nSatellite(betteanne)\nTenderized(betteanne)\nRecognise(betteanne, kali)\nforall x (Recognise(x, ephrem) -> Gage(ephrem, betteanne))\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> Gage(x, ephrem))\nRiddled(ephrem) -> not Gold(ephrem)\nforall x (Unedifying(x) and not Tenderized(x) -> not Reelect(x, kali))\nforall x (Gold(x) and Recognise(x, betteanne) -> Gage(betteanne, ephrem))\nforall x (Gage(x, betteanne) and not Gold(x) -> Reelect(betteanne, ephrem))\nforall x (Reelect(x, ephrem) -> Recognise(x, kali))\nforall x (Reelect(x, ephrem) and Riddled(ephrem) -> not Recognise(ephrem, kali))\n\nnot Gage(ephrem, kali)\n\nnot Gage(ephrem, kali) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The janeta is not reclaimed. The janeta paginate the craig. The janeta does not see the stephani. The craig is unfeasible. The stephani is knotty. The stephani is coagulated. The stephani paginate the janeta. If something paginate the craig then the craig ambuscade the stephani. If something is unfeasible then it ambuscade the craig. If the craig is unfeasible then the craig is not reclaimed. If something is omnipotent and not coagulated then it does not see the janeta. If something is reclaimed and it paginate the stephani then the stephani ambuscade the craig. If something ambuscade the stephani and it is not reclaimed then the stephani scrounge the craig. If something scrounge the craig then it paginate the janeta. If something scrounge the craig and the craig is unfeasible then the craig does not like the janeta. The craig is knotty.", "logic": "\nnot Reclaimed(janeta)\nPaginate(janeta, craig)\nnot Scrounge(janeta, stephani)\nUnfeasible(craig)\nKnotty(stephani)\nCoagulated(stephani)\nPaginate(stephani, janeta)\nforall x (Paginate(x, craig) -> Ambuscade(craig, stephani))\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) -> Ambuscade(x, craig))\nUnfeasible(craig) -> not Reclaimed(craig)\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) and not Coagulated(x) -> not Scrounge(x, janeta))\nforall x (Reclaimed(x) and Paginate(x, stephani) -> Ambuscade(stephani, craig))\nforall x (Ambuscade(x, stephani) and not Reclaimed(x) -> Scrounge(stephani, craig))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, craig) -> Paginate(x, janeta))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, craig) and Unfeasible(craig) -> not Paginate(craig, janeta))\n\nKnotty(craig)\n\nKnotty(craig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1283"} {"premises": "The cesya is unforceful. The cesya is burdensome. The cesya housebreak the estelle. The cesya recommit the estelle. The cesya sublimate the estelle. The estelle is chancy. The estelle is unforceful. The estelle is cleansing. The estelle is burdensome. The estelle housebreak the cesya. The estelle recommit the cesya. The estelle sublimate the cesya. If something sublimate the cesya then the cesya housebreak the estelle. If something sublimate the estelle then it is vinegary. If something is burdensome then it housebreak the estelle. If something recommit the estelle and the estelle recommit the cesya then the cesya is chancy. If something housebreak the estelle then it sublimate the estelle. If the cesya recommit the estelle then the estelle housebreak the cesya. The cesya housebreak the estelle.", "logic": "\nUnforceful(cesya)\nBurdensome(cesya)\nHousebreak(cesya, estelle)\nRecommit(cesya, estelle)\nSublimate(cesya, estelle)\nChancy(estelle)\nUnforceful(estelle)\nCleansing(estelle)\nBurdensome(estelle)\nHousebreak(estelle, cesya)\nRecommit(estelle, cesya)\nSublimate(estelle, cesya)\nforall x (Sublimate(x, cesya) -> Housebreak(cesya, estelle))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, estelle) -> Vinegary(x))\nforall x (Burdensome(x) -> Housebreak(x, estelle))\nforall x (Recommit(x, estelle) and Recommit(estelle, cesya) -> Chancy(cesya))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, estelle) -> Sublimate(x, estelle))\nRecommit(cesya, estelle) -> Housebreak(estelle, cesya)\n\nHousebreak(cesya, estelle)\n\ntherefore Housebreak(cesya, estelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The beitris is apraxic. The beitris is rimless. The beitris disturb the beaufort. The beitris clamor the beaufort. The beitris tame the beaufort. The beaufort is unpatented. The beaufort is apraxic. The beaufort is futile. The beaufort is rimless. The beaufort disturb the beitris. The beaufort clamor the beitris. The beaufort tame the beitris. If something tame the beitris then the beitris disturb the beaufort. If something tame the beaufort then it is fanged. If something is rimless then it disturb the beaufort. If something clamor the beaufort and the beaufort clamor the beitris then the beitris is unpatented. If something disturb the beaufort then it tame the beaufort. If the beitris clamor the beaufort then the beaufort disturb the beitris. The beitris is not rimless.", "logic": "\nApraxic(beitris)\nRimless(beitris)\nDisturb(beitris, beaufort)\nClamor(beitris, beaufort)\nTame(beitris, beaufort)\nUnpatented(beaufort)\nApraxic(beaufort)\nFutile(beaufort)\nRimless(beaufort)\nDisturb(beaufort, beitris)\nClamor(beaufort, beitris)\nTame(beaufort, beitris)\nforall x (Tame(x, beitris) -> Disturb(beitris, beaufort))\nforall x (Tame(x, beaufort) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Rimless(x) -> Disturb(x, beaufort))\nforall x (Clamor(x, beaufort) and Clamor(beaufort, beitris) -> Unpatented(beitris))\nforall x (Disturb(x, beaufort) -> Tame(x, beaufort))\nClamor(beitris, beaufort) -> Disturb(beaufort, beitris)\n\nnot Rimless(beitris)\n\ntherefore Rimless(beitris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The cordie is unintended. The cordie is serried. The cordie torpedo the carree. The cordie conga the carree. The cordie conjoin the carree. The carree is mucous. The carree is unintended. The carree is unsheathed. The carree is serried. The carree torpedo the cordie. The carree conga the cordie. The carree conjoin the cordie. If something conjoin the cordie then the cordie torpedo the carree. If something conjoin the carree then it is senescent. If something is serried then it torpedo the carree. If something conga the carree and the carree conga the cordie then the cordie is mucous. If something torpedo the carree then it conjoin the carree. If the cordie conga the carree then the carree torpedo the cordie. The cordie is senescent.", "logic": "\nUnintended(cordie)\nSerried(cordie)\nTorpedo(cordie, carree)\nConga(cordie, carree)\nConjoin(cordie, carree)\nMucous(carree)\nUnintended(carree)\nUnsheathed(carree)\nSerried(carree)\nTorpedo(carree, cordie)\nConga(carree, cordie)\nConjoin(carree, cordie)\nforall x (Conjoin(x, cordie) -> Torpedo(cordie, carree))\nforall x (Conjoin(x, carree) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Serried(x) -> Torpedo(x, carree))\nforall x (Conga(x, carree) and Conga(carree, cordie) -> Mucous(cordie))\nforall x (Torpedo(x, carree) -> Conjoin(x, carree))\nConga(cordie, carree) -> Torpedo(carree, cordie)\n\nSenescent(cordie)\n\nConjoin(cordie, carree) and forall x (Conjoin(x, carree) -> Senescent(x)) -> therefore Senescent(cordie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The jobey is churning. The jobey is cyprinoid. The jobey reheel the tadeas. The jobey land the tadeas. The jobey birdlime the tadeas. The tadeas is flawed. The tadeas is churning. The tadeas is pitiless. The tadeas is cyprinoid. The tadeas reheel the jobey. The tadeas land the jobey. The tadeas birdlime the jobey. If something birdlime the jobey then the jobey reheel the tadeas. If something birdlime the tadeas then it is static. If something is cyprinoid then it reheel the tadeas. If something land the tadeas and the tadeas land the jobey then the jobey is flawed. If something reheel the tadeas then it birdlime the tadeas. If the jobey land the tadeas then the tadeas reheel the jobey. The jobey is not flawed.", "logic": "\nChurning(jobey)\nCyprinoid(jobey)\nReheel(jobey, tadeas)\nLand(jobey, tadeas)\nBirdlime(jobey, tadeas)\nFlawed(tadeas)\nChurning(tadeas)\nPitiless(tadeas)\nCyprinoid(tadeas)\nReheel(tadeas, jobey)\nLand(tadeas, jobey)\nBirdlime(tadeas, jobey)\nforall x (Birdlime(x, jobey) -> Reheel(jobey, tadeas))\nforall x (Birdlime(x, tadeas) -> Static(x))\nforall x (Cyprinoid(x) -> Reheel(x, tadeas))\nforall x (Land(x, tadeas) and Land(tadeas, jobey) -> Flawed(jobey))\nforall x (Reheel(x, tadeas) -> Birdlime(x, tadeas))\nLand(jobey, tadeas) -> Reheel(tadeas, jobey)\n\nnot Flawed(jobey)\n\nLand(jobey, tadeas) and Land(tadeas, jobey) and forall x (Land(x, tadeas) and Land(tadeas, jobey) -> Flawed(jobey)) -> therefore Flawed(jobey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The dieter is shady. The dieter is underwater. The dieter avianize the nerty. The dieter natter the nerty. The dieter amaze the nerty. The nerty is bawdy. The nerty is shady. The nerty is loose. The nerty is underwater. The nerty avianize the dieter. The nerty natter the dieter. The nerty amaze the dieter. If something amaze the dieter then the dieter avianize the nerty. If something amaze the nerty then it is protrusive. If something is underwater then it avianize the nerty. If something natter the nerty and the nerty natter the dieter then the dieter is bawdy. If something avianize the nerty then it amaze the nerty. If the dieter natter the nerty then the nerty avianize the dieter. The nerty amaze the nerty.", "logic": "\nShady(dieter)\nUnderwater(dieter)\nAvianize(dieter, nerty)\nNatter(dieter, nerty)\nAmaze(dieter, nerty)\nBawdy(nerty)\nShady(nerty)\nLoose(nerty)\nUnderwater(nerty)\nAvianize(nerty, dieter)\nNatter(nerty, dieter)\nAmaze(nerty, dieter)\nforall x (Amaze(x, dieter) -> Avianize(dieter, nerty))\nforall x (Amaze(x, nerty) -> Protrusive(x))\nforall x (Underwater(x) -> Avianize(x, nerty))\nforall x (Natter(x, nerty) and Natter(nerty, dieter) -> Bawdy(dieter))\nforall x (Avianize(x, nerty) -> Amaze(x, nerty))\nNatter(dieter, nerty) -> Avianize(nerty, dieter)\n\nAmaze(nerty, nerty)\n\nUnderwater(nerty) and forall x (Underwater(x) -> Avianize(x, nerty)) -> therefore Avianize(nerty, nerty) Avianize(nerty, nerty) and forall x (Avianize(x, nerty) -> Amaze(x, nerty)) -> therefore Amaze(nerty, nerty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The candra is boundless. The candra is resinated. The candra reprehend the shell. The candra satiate the shell. The candra transcribe the shell. The shell is fibreoptic. The shell is boundless. The shell is hypnotized. The shell is resinated. The shell reprehend the candra. The shell satiate the candra. The shell transcribe the candra. If something transcribe the candra then the candra reprehend the shell. If something transcribe the shell then it is autosomal. If something is resinated then it reprehend the shell. If something satiate the shell and the shell satiate the candra then the candra is fibreoptic. If something reprehend the shell then it transcribe the shell. If the candra satiate the shell then the shell reprehend the candra. The shell does not visit the shell.", "logic": "\nBoundless(candra)\nResinated(candra)\nReprehend(candra, shell)\nSatiate(candra, shell)\nTranscribe(candra, shell)\nFibreoptic(shell)\nBoundless(shell)\nHypnotized(shell)\nResinated(shell)\nReprehend(shell, candra)\nSatiate(shell, candra)\nTranscribe(shell, candra)\nforall x (Transcribe(x, candra) -> Reprehend(candra, shell))\nforall x (Transcribe(x, shell) -> Autosomal(x))\nforall x (Resinated(x) -> Reprehend(x, shell))\nforall x (Satiate(x, shell) and Satiate(shell, candra) -> Fibreoptic(candra))\nforall x (Reprehend(x, shell) -> Transcribe(x, shell))\nSatiate(candra, shell) -> Reprehend(shell, candra)\n\nnot Transcribe(shell, shell)\n\nResinated(shell) and forall x (Resinated(x) -> Reprehend(x, shell)) -> therefore Reprehend(shell, shell) Reprehend(shell, shell) and forall x (Reprehend(x, shell) -> Transcribe(x, shell)) -> therefore Transcribe(shell, shell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The antoni is mouthlike. The antoni is conventual. The antoni fool the genevra. The antoni gormandize the genevra. The antoni hurrah the genevra. The genevra is hackneyed. The genevra is mouthlike. The genevra is foggy. The genevra is conventual. The genevra fool the antoni. The genevra gormandize the antoni. The genevra hurrah the antoni. If something hurrah the antoni then the antoni fool the genevra. If something hurrah the genevra then it is centroidal. If something is conventual then it fool the genevra. If something gormandize the genevra and the genevra gormandize the antoni then the antoni is hackneyed. If something fool the genevra then it hurrah the genevra. If the antoni gormandize the genevra then the genevra fool the antoni. The genevra is centroidal.", "logic": "\nMouthlike(antoni)\nConventual(antoni)\nFool(antoni, genevra)\nGormandize(antoni, genevra)\nHurrah(antoni, genevra)\nHackneyed(genevra)\nMouthlike(genevra)\nFoggy(genevra)\nConventual(genevra)\nFool(genevra, antoni)\nGormandize(genevra, antoni)\nHurrah(genevra, antoni)\nforall x (Hurrah(x, antoni) -> Fool(antoni, genevra))\nforall x (Hurrah(x, genevra) -> Centroidal(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Fool(x, genevra))\nforall x (Gormandize(x, genevra) and Gormandize(genevra, antoni) -> Hackneyed(antoni))\nforall x (Fool(x, genevra) -> Hurrah(x, genevra))\nGormandize(antoni, genevra) -> Fool(genevra, antoni)\n\nCentroidal(genevra)\n\nConventual(genevra) and forall x (Conventual(x) -> Fool(x, genevra)) -> therefore Fool(genevra, genevra) Fool(genevra, genevra) and forall x (Fool(x, genevra) -> Hurrah(x, genevra)) -> therefore Hurrah(genevra, genevra) Hurrah(genevra, genevra) and forall x (Hurrah(x, genevra) -> Centroidal(x)) -> therefore Centroidal(genevra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The rutter is dyspneic. The rutter is blase. The rutter mistake the melania. The rutter admeasure the melania. The rutter angle the melania. The melania is unavowed. The melania is dyspneic. The melania is paschal. The melania is blase. The melania mistake the rutter. The melania admeasure the rutter. The melania angle the rutter. If something angle the rutter then the rutter mistake the melania. If something angle the melania then it is privileged. If something is blase then it mistake the melania. If something admeasure the melania and the melania admeasure the rutter then the rutter is unavowed. If something mistake the melania then it angle the melania. If the rutter admeasure the melania then the melania mistake the rutter. The melania is not privileged.", "logic": "\nDyspneic(rutter)\nBlase(rutter)\nMistake(rutter, melania)\nAdmeasure(rutter, melania)\nAngle(rutter, melania)\nUnavowed(melania)\nDyspneic(melania)\nPaschal(melania)\nBlase(melania)\nMistake(melania, rutter)\nAdmeasure(melania, rutter)\nAngle(melania, rutter)\nforall x (Angle(x, rutter) -> Mistake(rutter, melania))\nforall x (Angle(x, melania) -> Privileged(x))\nforall x (Blase(x) -> Mistake(x, melania))\nforall x (Admeasure(x, melania) and Admeasure(melania, rutter) -> Unavowed(rutter))\nforall x (Mistake(x, melania) -> Angle(x, melania))\nAdmeasure(rutter, melania) -> Mistake(melania, rutter)\n\nnot Privileged(melania)\n\nBlase(melania) and forall x (Blase(x) -> Mistake(x, melania)) -> therefore Mistake(melania, melania) Mistake(melania, melania) and forall x (Mistake(x, melania) -> Angle(x, melania)) -> therefore Angle(melania, melania) Angle(melania, melania) and forall x (Angle(x, melania) -> Privileged(x)) -> therefore Privileged(melania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The rafe is shielded. The rafe is redux. The rafe refurnish the dehlia. The rafe misjudge the dehlia. The rafe chandelle the dehlia. The dehlia is fond. The dehlia is shielded. The dehlia is likely. The dehlia is redux. The dehlia refurnish the rafe. The dehlia misjudge the rafe. The dehlia chandelle the rafe. If something chandelle the rafe then the rafe refurnish the dehlia. If something chandelle the dehlia then it is dropping. If something is redux then it refurnish the dehlia. If something misjudge the dehlia and the dehlia misjudge the rafe then the rafe is fond. If something refurnish the dehlia then it chandelle the dehlia. If the rafe misjudge the dehlia then the dehlia refurnish the rafe. The dehlia does not see the dehlia.", "logic": "\nShielded(rafe)\nRedux(rafe)\nRefurnish(rafe, dehlia)\nMisjudge(rafe, dehlia)\nChandelle(rafe, dehlia)\nFond(dehlia)\nShielded(dehlia)\nLikely(dehlia)\nRedux(dehlia)\nRefurnish(dehlia, rafe)\nMisjudge(dehlia, rafe)\nChandelle(dehlia, rafe)\nforall x (Chandelle(x, rafe) -> Refurnish(rafe, dehlia))\nforall x (Chandelle(x, dehlia) -> Dropping(x))\nforall x (Redux(x) -> Refurnish(x, dehlia))\nforall x (Misjudge(x, dehlia) and Misjudge(dehlia, rafe) -> Fond(rafe))\nforall x (Refurnish(x, dehlia) -> Chandelle(x, dehlia))\nMisjudge(rafe, dehlia) -> Refurnish(dehlia, rafe)\n\nnot Misjudge(dehlia, dehlia)\n\nnot Misjudge(dehlia, dehlia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The jared is subnormal. The jared is wooded. The jared footslog the illa. The jared create the illa. The jared glitter the illa. The illa is scathing. The illa is subnormal. The illa is lxxiv. The illa is wooded. The illa footslog the jared. The illa create the jared. The illa glitter the jared. If something glitter the jared then the jared footslog the illa. If something glitter the illa then it is sybaritic. If something is wooded then it footslog the illa. If something create the illa and the illa create the jared then the jared is scathing. If something footslog the illa then it glitter the illa. If the jared create the illa then the illa footslog the jared. The jared footslog the jared.", "logic": "\nSubnormal(jared)\nWooded(jared)\nFootslog(jared, illa)\nCreate(jared, illa)\nGlitter(jared, illa)\nScathing(illa)\nSubnormal(illa)\nLxxiv(illa)\nWooded(illa)\nFootslog(illa, jared)\nCreate(illa, jared)\nGlitter(illa, jared)\nforall x (Glitter(x, jared) -> Footslog(jared, illa))\nforall x (Glitter(x, illa) -> Sybaritic(x))\nforall x (Wooded(x) -> Footslog(x, illa))\nforall x (Create(x, illa) and Create(illa, jared) -> Scathing(jared))\nforall x (Footslog(x, illa) -> Glitter(x, illa))\nCreate(jared, illa) -> Footslog(illa, jared)\n\nFootslog(jared, jared)\n\nFootslog(jared, jared) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The sena is anomic. The sena is awash. The sena ready the tamera. The sena furrow the tamera. The sena service the tamera. The tamera is indicatory. The tamera is anomic. The tamera is corrected. The tamera is awash. The tamera ready the sena. The tamera furrow the sena. The tamera service the sena. If something service the sena then the sena ready the tamera. If something service the tamera then it is contorted. If something is awash then it ready the tamera. If something furrow the tamera and the tamera furrow the sena then the sena is indicatory. If something ready the tamera then it service the tamera. If the sena furrow the tamera then the tamera ready the sena. The sena is not corrected.", "logic": "\nAnomic(sena)\nAwash(sena)\nReady(sena, tamera)\nFurrow(sena, tamera)\nService(sena, tamera)\nIndicatory(tamera)\nAnomic(tamera)\nCorrected(tamera)\nAwash(tamera)\nReady(tamera, sena)\nFurrow(tamera, sena)\nService(tamera, sena)\nforall x (Service(x, sena) -> Ready(sena, tamera))\nforall x (Service(x, tamera) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Awash(x) -> Ready(x, tamera))\nforall x (Furrow(x, tamera) and Furrow(tamera, sena) -> Indicatory(sena))\nforall x (Ready(x, tamera) -> Service(x, tamera))\nFurrow(sena, tamera) -> Ready(tamera, sena)\n\nnot Corrected(sena)\n\nnot Corrected(sena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "The evy is stupendous. The evy is taurine. The evy commend the lisabeth. The evy pulverize the lisabeth. The evy unstuff the lisabeth. The lisabeth is whole. The lisabeth is stupendous. The lisabeth is bracing. The lisabeth is taurine. The lisabeth commend the evy. The lisabeth pulverize the evy. The lisabeth unstuff the evy. If something unstuff the evy then the evy commend the lisabeth. If something unstuff the lisabeth then it is starless. If something is taurine then it commend the lisabeth. If something pulverize the lisabeth and the lisabeth pulverize the evy then the evy is whole. If something commend the lisabeth then it unstuff the lisabeth. If the evy pulverize the lisabeth then the lisabeth commend the evy. The evy unstuff the evy.", "logic": "\nStupendous(evy)\nTaurine(evy)\nCommend(evy, lisabeth)\nPulverize(evy, lisabeth)\nUnstuff(evy, lisabeth)\nWhole(lisabeth)\nStupendous(lisabeth)\nBracing(lisabeth)\nTaurine(lisabeth)\nCommend(lisabeth, evy)\nPulverize(lisabeth, evy)\nUnstuff(lisabeth, evy)\nforall x (Unstuff(x, evy) -> Commend(evy, lisabeth))\nforall x (Unstuff(x, lisabeth) -> Starless(x))\nforall x (Taurine(x) -> Commend(x, lisabeth))\nforall x (Pulverize(x, lisabeth) and Pulverize(lisabeth, evy) -> Whole(evy))\nforall x (Commend(x, lisabeth) -> Unstuff(x, lisabeth))\nPulverize(evy, lisabeth) -> Commend(lisabeth, evy)\n\nUnstuff(evy, evy)\n\nUnstuff(evy, evy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1342"} {"premises": "Lorilyn is stylistic. Jeffie is untested. Kalman is not untested. If Kalman is judaic and Kalman is manual then Kalman is not thin. All stylistic people are judaic. If someone is credited then they are manual. All stylistic people are credited. If Jeffie is thin and Jeffie is unsafe then Jeffie is not judaic. Red people are untested. If someone is stylistic and not manual then they are untested. If someone is manual and untested then they are unsafe. Lorilyn is stylistic.", "logic": "\nStylistic(lorilyn)\nUntested(jeffie)\nnot Untested(kalman)\nJudaic(kalman) and Manual(kalman) -> not Thin(kalman)\nforall x (Stylistic(x) -> Judaic(x))\nforall x (Credited(x) -> Manual(x))\nforall x (Stylistic(x) -> Credited(x))\nThin(jeffie) and Unsafe(jeffie) -> not Judaic(jeffie)\nforall x (Credited(x) -> Untested(x))\nforall x (Stylistic(x) and not Manual(x) -> Untested(x))\nforall x (Manual(x) and Untested(x) -> Unsafe(x))\n\nStylistic(lorilyn)\n\ntherefore Stylistic(lorilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Levon is analyzable. Anselm is afrikaans. Puff is not afrikaans. If Puff is cuspate and Puff is costate then Puff is not bounderish. All analyzable people are cuspate. If someone is shrill then they are costate. All analyzable people are shrill. If Anselm is bounderish and Anselm is lyrate then Anselm is not cuspate. Red people are afrikaans. If someone is analyzable and not costate then they are afrikaans. If someone is costate and afrikaans then they are lyrate. Levon is not analyzable.", "logic": "\nAnalyzable(levon)\nAfrikaans(anselm)\nnot Afrikaans(puff)\nCuspate(puff) and Costate(puff) -> not Bounderish(puff)\nforall x (Analyzable(x) -> Cuspate(x))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Costate(x))\nforall x (Analyzable(x) -> Shrill(x))\nBounderish(anselm) and Lyrate(anselm) -> not Cuspate(anselm)\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Analyzable(x) and not Costate(x) -> Afrikaans(x))\nforall x (Costate(x) and Afrikaans(x) -> Lyrate(x))\n\nnot Analyzable(levon)\n\ntherefore Analyzable(levon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Trudy is gradable. Sanson is economic. Tony is not economic. If Tony is leftover and Tony is uncombed then Tony is not syncretic. All gradable people are leftover. If someone is clangorous then they are uncombed. All gradable people are clangorous. If Sanson is syncretic and Sanson is dominant then Sanson is not leftover. Red people are economic. If someone is gradable and not uncombed then they are economic. If someone is uncombed and economic then they are dominant. Trudy is clangorous.", "logic": "\nGradable(trudy)\nEconomic(sanson)\nnot Economic(tony)\nLeftover(tony) and Uncombed(tony) -> not Syncretic(tony)\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Leftover(x))\nforall x (Clangorous(x) -> Uncombed(x))\nforall x (Gradable(x) -> Clangorous(x))\nSyncretic(sanson) and Dominant(sanson) -> not Leftover(sanson)\nforall x (Clangorous(x) -> Economic(x))\nforall x (Gradable(x) and not Uncombed(x) -> Economic(x))\nforall x (Uncombed(x) and Economic(x) -> Dominant(x))\n\nClangorous(trudy)\n\nGradable(trudy) and forall x (Gradable(x) -> Clangorous(x)) -> therefore Clangorous(trudy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Garfield is lentissimo. Reena is haggard. Vivyan is not haggard. If Vivyan is wilted and Vivyan is unplumbed then Vivyan is not lxxxii. All lentissimo people are wilted. If someone is rutty then they are unplumbed. All lentissimo people are rutty. If Reena is lxxxii and Reena is overdone then Reena is not wilted. Red people are haggard. If someone is lentissimo and not unplumbed then they are haggard. If someone is unplumbed and haggard then they are overdone. Garfield is not rutty.", "logic": "\nLentissimo(garfield)\nHaggard(reena)\nnot Haggard(vivyan)\nWilted(vivyan) and Unplumbed(vivyan) -> not Lxxxii(vivyan)\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) -> Wilted(x))\nforall x (Rutty(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) -> Rutty(x))\nLxxxii(reena) and Overdone(reena) -> not Wilted(reena)\nforall x (Rutty(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) and not Unplumbed(x) -> Haggard(x))\nforall x (Unplumbed(x) and Haggard(x) -> Overdone(x))\n\nnot Rutty(garfield)\n\nLentissimo(garfield) and forall x (Lentissimo(x) -> Rutty(x)) -> therefore Rutty(garfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Meara is disloyal. Conny is hortative. Menard is not hortative. If Menard is incisive and Menard is fleeting then Menard is not glimmery. All disloyal people are incisive. If someone is celibate then they are fleeting. All disloyal people are celibate. If Conny is glimmery and Conny is ungainly then Conny is not incisive. Red people are hortative. If someone is disloyal and not fleeting then they are hortative. If someone is fleeting and hortative then they are ungainly. Meara is fleeting.", "logic": "\nDisloyal(meara)\nHortative(conny)\nnot Hortative(menard)\nIncisive(menard) and Fleeting(menard) -> not Glimmery(menard)\nforall x (Disloyal(x) -> Incisive(x))\nforall x (Celibate(x) -> Fleeting(x))\nforall x (Disloyal(x) -> Celibate(x))\nGlimmery(conny) and Ungainly(conny) -> not Incisive(conny)\nforall x (Celibate(x) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Disloyal(x) and not Fleeting(x) -> Hortative(x))\nforall x (Fleeting(x) and Hortative(x) -> Ungainly(x))\n\nFleeting(meara)\n\nDisloyal(meara) and forall x (Disloyal(x) -> Celibate(x)) -> therefore Celibate(meara) Celibate(meara) and forall x (Celibate(x) -> Fleeting(x)) -> therefore Fleeting(meara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Isabelle is coptic. Chancey is desecrated. Brewster is not desecrated. If Brewster is sharing and Brewster is visaged then Brewster is not playful. All coptic people are sharing. If someone is niffy then they are visaged. All coptic people are niffy. If Chancey is playful and Chancey is alvine then Chancey is not sharing. Red people are desecrated. If someone is coptic and not visaged then they are desecrated. If someone is visaged and desecrated then they are alvine. Isabelle is not desecrated.", "logic": "\nCoptic(isabelle)\nDesecrated(chancey)\nnot Desecrated(brewster)\nSharing(brewster) and Visaged(brewster) -> not Playful(brewster)\nforall x (Coptic(x) -> Sharing(x))\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> Visaged(x))\nforall x (Coptic(x) -> Niffy(x))\nPlayful(chancey) and Alvine(chancey) -> not Sharing(chancey)\nforall x (Niffy(x) -> Desecrated(x))\nforall x (Coptic(x) and not Visaged(x) -> Desecrated(x))\nforall x (Visaged(x) and Desecrated(x) -> Alvine(x))\n\nnot Desecrated(isabelle)\n\nCoptic(isabelle) and forall x (Coptic(x) -> Niffy(x)) -> therefore Niffy(isabelle) Niffy(isabelle) and forall x (Niffy(x) -> Desecrated(x)) -> therefore Desecrated(isabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Seamus is barbellate. Sander is saucy. Margurite is not saucy. If Margurite is poky and Margurite is colored then Margurite is not varying. All barbellate people are poky. If someone is exoergic then they are colored. All barbellate people are exoergic. If Sander is varying and Sander is soughing then Sander is not poky. Red people are saucy. If someone is barbellate and not colored then they are saucy. If someone is colored and saucy then they are soughing. Seamus is soughing.", "logic": "\nBarbellate(seamus)\nSaucy(sander)\nnot Saucy(margurite)\nPoky(margurite) and Colored(margurite) -> not Varying(margurite)\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Poky(x))\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Colored(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Exoergic(x))\nVarying(sander) and Soughing(sander) -> not Poky(sander)\nforall x (Exoergic(x) -> Saucy(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) and not Colored(x) -> Saucy(x))\nforall x (Colored(x) and Saucy(x) -> Soughing(x))\n\nSoughing(seamus)\n\nBarbellate(seamus) and forall x (Barbellate(x) -> Exoergic(x)) -> therefore Exoergic(seamus) Exoergic(seamus) and forall x (Exoergic(x) -> Colored(x)) -> therefore Colored(seamus) Barbellate(seamus) and forall x (Barbellate(x) -> Exoergic(x)) -> therefore Exoergic(seamus) Exoergic(seamus) and forall x (Exoergic(x) -> Saucy(x)) -> therefore Saucy(seamus) Colored(seamus) and Saucy(seamus) and forall x (Colored(x) and Saucy(x) -> Soughing(x)) -> therefore Soughing(seamus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Alysa is devoted. Amery is ingrowing. Sonni is not ingrowing. If Sonni is maidenly and Sonni is myoid then Sonni is not imposing. All devoted people are maidenly. If someone is allegretto then they are myoid. All devoted people are allegretto. If Amery is imposing and Amery is tubeless then Amery is not maidenly. Red people are ingrowing. If someone is devoted and not myoid then they are ingrowing. If someone is myoid and ingrowing then they are tubeless. Alysa is not tubeless.", "logic": "\nDevoted(alysa)\nIngrowing(amery)\nnot Ingrowing(sonni)\nMaidenly(sonni) and Myoid(sonni) -> not Imposing(sonni)\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Maidenly(x))\nforall x (Allegretto(x) -> Myoid(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) -> Allegretto(x))\nImposing(amery) and Tubeless(amery) -> not Maidenly(amery)\nforall x (Allegretto(x) -> Ingrowing(x))\nforall x (Devoted(x) and not Myoid(x) -> Ingrowing(x))\nforall x (Myoid(x) and Ingrowing(x) -> Tubeless(x))\n\nnot Tubeless(alysa)\n\nDevoted(alysa) and forall x (Devoted(x) -> Allegretto(x)) -> therefore Allegretto(alysa) Allegretto(alysa) and forall x (Allegretto(x) -> Myoid(x)) -> therefore Myoid(alysa) Devoted(alysa) and forall x (Devoted(x) -> Allegretto(x)) -> therefore Allegretto(alysa) Allegretto(alysa) and forall x (Allegretto(x) -> Ingrowing(x)) -> therefore Ingrowing(alysa) Myoid(alysa) and Ingrowing(alysa) and forall x (Myoid(x) and Ingrowing(x) -> Tubeless(x)) -> therefore Tubeless(alysa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Susanne is ungarbed. Inessa is downtown. Pearle is not downtown. If Pearle is taxonomic and Pearle is horrible then Pearle is not patrician. All ungarbed people are taxonomic. If someone is puzzled then they are horrible. All ungarbed people are puzzled. If Inessa is patrician and Inessa is scalable then Inessa is not taxonomic. Red people are downtown. If someone is ungarbed and not horrible then they are downtown. If someone is horrible and downtown then they are scalable. Inessa is not scalable.", "logic": "\nUngarbed(susanne)\nDowntown(inessa)\nnot Downtown(pearle)\nTaxonomic(pearle) and Horrible(pearle) -> not Patrician(pearle)\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Taxonomic(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Horrible(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Puzzled(x))\nPatrician(inessa) and Scalable(inessa) -> not Taxonomic(inessa)\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Downtown(x))\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) and not Horrible(x) -> Downtown(x))\nforall x (Horrible(x) and Downtown(x) -> Scalable(x))\n\nnot Scalable(inessa)\n\nforall x (Horrible(x) and Downtown(x) -> Scalable(x)) <- forall x (Puzzled(x) -> Horrible(x)) <- forall x (Ungarbed(x) -> Puzzled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Rosalyn is ordered. Joan is doleful. Lona is not doleful. If Lona is unshapely and Lona is bighearted then Lona is not surpliced. All ordered people are unshapely. If someone is drenched then they are bighearted. All ordered people are drenched. If Joan is surpliced and Joan is unpleasant then Joan is not unshapely. Red people are doleful. If someone is ordered and not bighearted then they are doleful. If someone is bighearted and doleful then they are unpleasant. Lona is drenched.", "logic": "\nOrdered(rosalyn)\nDoleful(joan)\nnot Doleful(lona)\nUnshapely(lona) and Bighearted(lona) -> not Surpliced(lona)\nforall x (Ordered(x) -> Unshapely(x))\nforall x (Drenched(x) -> Bighearted(x))\nforall x (Ordered(x) -> Drenched(x))\nSurpliced(joan) and Unpleasant(joan) -> not Unshapely(joan)\nforall x (Drenched(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Ordered(x) and not Bighearted(x) -> Doleful(x))\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Doleful(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\n\nDrenched(lona)\n\nforall x (Ordered(x) -> Drenched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Stevy is abeyant. Cory is baking. Wood is not baking. If Wood is mitigative and Wood is surly then Wood is not chaffy. All abeyant people are mitigative. If someone is soused then they are surly. All abeyant people are soused. If Cory is chaffy and Cory is aquaphobic then Cory is not mitigative. Red people are baking. If someone is abeyant and not surly then they are baking. If someone is surly and baking then they are aquaphobic. Cory is not soused.", "logic": "\nAbeyant(stevy)\nBaking(cory)\nnot Baking(wood)\nMitigative(wood) and Surly(wood) -> not Chaffy(wood)\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Soused(x) -> Surly(x))\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Soused(x))\nChaffy(cory) and Aquaphobic(cory) -> not Mitigative(cory)\nforall x (Soused(x) -> Baking(x))\nforall x (Abeyant(x) and not Surly(x) -> Baking(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) and Baking(x) -> Aquaphobic(x))\n\nnot Soused(cory)\n\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Soused(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Robinson is landed. Amabel is westside. Urbano is not westside. If Urbano is shodden and Urbano is abridged then Urbano is not bribable. All landed people are shodden. If someone is obscure then they are abridged. All landed people are obscure. If Amabel is bribable and Amabel is burnished then Amabel is not shodden. Red people are westside. If someone is landed and not abridged then they are westside. If someone is abridged and westside then they are burnished. Urbano is burnished.", "logic": "\nLanded(robinson)\nWestside(amabel)\nnot Westside(urbano)\nShodden(urbano) and Abridged(urbano) -> not Bribable(urbano)\nforall x (Landed(x) -> Shodden(x))\nforall x (Obscure(x) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Landed(x) -> Obscure(x))\nBribable(amabel) and Burnished(amabel) -> not Shodden(amabel)\nforall x (Obscure(x) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Landed(x) and not Abridged(x) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) and Westside(x) -> Burnished(x))\n\nBurnished(urbano)\n\nforall x (Abridged(x) and Westside(x) -> Burnished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Janetta is sourish. Hagan is vasiform. Hellene is not vasiform. If Hellene is scopal and Hellene is amylaceous then Hellene is not moldable. All sourish people are scopal. If someone is homostyled then they are amylaceous. All sourish people are homostyled. If Hagan is moldable and Hagan is amygdaline then Hagan is not scopal. Red people are vasiform. If someone is sourish and not amylaceous then they are vasiform. If someone is amylaceous and vasiform then they are amygdaline. Hellene is not moldable.", "logic": "\nSourish(janetta)\nVasiform(hagan)\nnot Vasiform(hellene)\nScopal(hellene) and Amylaceous(hellene) -> not Moldable(hellene)\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Scopal(x))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) -> Amylaceous(x))\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nMoldable(hagan) and Amygdaline(hagan) -> not Scopal(hagan)\nforall x (Homostyled(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Sourish(x) and not Amylaceous(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Amylaceous(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\n\nnot Moldable(hellene)\n\nnot Moldable(hellene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Archy is heralded. Sancho is eucaryotic. Clareta is not eucaryotic. If Clareta is mitigated and Clareta is evitable then Clareta is not agreed. All heralded people are mitigated. If someone is unroofed then they are evitable. All heralded people are unroofed. If Sancho is agreed and Sancho is opened then Sancho is not mitigated. Red people are eucaryotic. If someone is heralded and not evitable then they are eucaryotic. If someone is evitable and eucaryotic then they are opened. Archy is agreed.", "logic": "\nHeralded(archy)\nEucaryotic(sancho)\nnot Eucaryotic(clareta)\nMitigated(clareta) and Evitable(clareta) -> not Agreed(clareta)\nforall x (Heralded(x) -> Mitigated(x))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Evitable(x))\nforall x (Heralded(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nAgreed(sancho) and Opened(sancho) -> not Mitigated(sancho)\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Eucaryotic(x))\nforall x (Heralded(x) and not Evitable(x) -> Eucaryotic(x))\nforall x (Evitable(x) and Eucaryotic(x) -> Opened(x))\n\nAgreed(archy)\n\nAgreed(archy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Zeke is restricted. Hilda is tigerish. Lawton is not tigerish. If Lawton is mucinoid and Lawton is untraveled then Lawton is not unorthodox. All restricted people are mucinoid. If someone is seafaring then they are untraveled. All restricted people are seafaring. If Hilda is unorthodox and Hilda is impelling then Hilda is not mucinoid. Red people are tigerish. If someone is restricted and not untraveled then they are tigerish. If someone is untraveled and tigerish then they are impelling. Hilda is not restricted.", "logic": "\nRestricted(zeke)\nTigerish(hilda)\nnot Tigerish(lawton)\nMucinoid(lawton) and Untraveled(lawton) -> not Unorthodox(lawton)\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Seafaring(x) -> Untraveled(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) -> Seafaring(x))\nUnorthodox(hilda) and Impelling(hilda) -> not Mucinoid(hilda)\nforall x (Seafaring(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Restricted(x) and not Untraveled(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Untraveled(x) and Tigerish(x) -> Impelling(x))\n\nnot Restricted(hilda)\n\nnot Restricted(hilda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "Alla is impudent. Rosette is biaxate. Edith is not biaxate. If Edith is present and Edith is cxxx then Edith is not midi. All impudent people are present. If someone is labeled then they are cxxx. All impudent people are labeled. If Rosette is midi and Rosette is lustreless then Rosette is not present. Red people are biaxate. If someone is impudent and not cxxx then they are biaxate. If someone is cxxx and biaxate then they are lustreless. Edith is impudent.", "logic": "\nImpudent(alla)\nBiaxate(rosette)\nnot Biaxate(edith)\nPresent(edith) and Cxxx(edith) -> not Midi(edith)\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Present(x))\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Cxxx(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Labeled(x))\nMidi(rosette) and Lustreless(rosette) -> not Present(rosette)\nforall x (Labeled(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) and not Cxxx(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Cxxx(x) and Biaxate(x) -> Lustreless(x))\n\nImpudent(edith)\n\nImpudent(edith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-551"} {"premises": "The arvie savour the moore. The moore is apostate. The moore intensify the rutger. The rutger devastate the betti. The rutger intensify the betti. The rutger savour the betti. The betti is aromatic. The betti is auroral. The betti devastate the rutger. The betti intensify the moore. If something savour the moore and it devastate the moore then the moore savour the rutger. If something savour the rutger then it intensify the arvie. If something devastate the moore then it savour the moore. If the arvie intensify the rutger and the rutger is jaundiced then the rutger devastate the arvie. If something savour the moore then it devastate the moore. If the moore devastate the arvie and the arvie is jaundiced then the moore devastate the rutger. If something is aromatic and it intensify the moore then the moore is jaundiced. If something devastate the rutger then it intensify the betti. The rutger intensify the betti.", "logic": "\nSavour(arvie, moore)\nApostate(moore)\nIntensify(moore, rutger)\nDevastate(rutger, betti)\nIntensify(rutger, betti)\nSavour(rutger, betti)\nAromatic(betti)\nAuroral(betti)\nDevastate(betti, rutger)\nIntensify(betti, moore)\nforall x (Savour(x, moore) and Devastate(x, moore) -> Savour(moore, rutger))\nforall x (Savour(x, rutger) -> Intensify(x, arvie))\nforall x (Devastate(x, moore) -> Savour(x, moore))\nIntensify(arvie, rutger) and Jaundiced(rutger) -> Devastate(rutger, arvie)\nforall x (Savour(x, moore) -> Devastate(x, moore))\nDevastate(moore, arvie) and Jaundiced(arvie) -> Devastate(moore, rutger)\nforall x (Aromatic(x) and Intensify(x, moore) -> Jaundiced(moore))\nforall x (Devastate(x, rutger) -> Intensify(x, betti))\n\nIntensify(rutger, betti)\n\ntherefore Intensify(rutger, betti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The ranee snub the fonsie. The fonsie is affinal. The fonsie rush the edward. The edward make the christean. The edward rush the christean. The edward snub the christean. The christean is rampageous. The christean is whitish. The christean make the edward. The christean rush the fonsie. If something snub the fonsie and it make the fonsie then the fonsie snub the edward. If something snub the edward then it rush the ranee. If something make the fonsie then it snub the fonsie. If the ranee rush the edward and the edward is embattled then the edward make the ranee. If something snub the fonsie then it make the fonsie. If the fonsie make the ranee and the ranee is embattled then the fonsie make the edward. If something is rampageous and it rush the fonsie then the fonsie is embattled. If something make the edward then it rush the christean. The fonsie does not see the edward.", "logic": "\nSnub(ranee, fonsie)\nAffinal(fonsie)\nRush(fonsie, edward)\nMake(edward, christean)\nRush(edward, christean)\nSnub(edward, christean)\nRampageous(christean)\nWhitish(christean)\nMake(christean, edward)\nRush(christean, fonsie)\nforall x (Snub(x, fonsie) and Make(x, fonsie) -> Snub(fonsie, edward))\nforall x (Snub(x, edward) -> Rush(x, ranee))\nforall x (Make(x, fonsie) -> Snub(x, fonsie))\nRush(ranee, edward) and Embattled(edward) -> Make(edward, ranee)\nforall x (Snub(x, fonsie) -> Make(x, fonsie))\nMake(fonsie, ranee) and Embattled(ranee) -> Make(fonsie, edward)\nforall x (Rampageous(x) and Rush(x, fonsie) -> Embattled(fonsie))\nforall x (Make(x, edward) -> Rush(x, christean))\n\nnot Rush(fonsie, edward)\n\ntherefore Rush(fonsie, edward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The giorgia impanel the mustafa. The mustafa is umbellar. The mustafa oscillate the selig. The selig combine the lonna. The selig oscillate the lonna. The selig impanel the lonna. The lonna is expressed. The lonna is fecal. The lonna combine the selig. The lonna oscillate the mustafa. If something impanel the mustafa and it combine the mustafa then the mustafa impanel the selig. If something impanel the selig then it oscillate the giorgia. If something combine the mustafa then it impanel the mustafa. If the giorgia oscillate the selig and the selig is english then the selig combine the giorgia. If something impanel the mustafa then it combine the mustafa. If the mustafa combine the giorgia and the giorgia is english then the mustafa combine the selig. If something is expressed and it oscillate the mustafa then the mustafa is english. If something combine the selig then it oscillate the lonna. The lonna oscillate the lonna.", "logic": "\nImpanel(giorgia, mustafa)\nUmbellar(mustafa)\nOscillate(mustafa, selig)\nCombine(selig, lonna)\nOscillate(selig, lonna)\nImpanel(selig, lonna)\nExpressed(lonna)\nFecal(lonna)\nCombine(lonna, selig)\nOscillate(lonna, mustafa)\nforall x (Impanel(x, mustafa) and Combine(x, mustafa) -> Impanel(mustafa, selig))\nforall x (Impanel(x, selig) -> Oscillate(x, giorgia))\nforall x (Combine(x, mustafa) -> Impanel(x, mustafa))\nOscillate(giorgia, selig) and English(selig) -> Combine(selig, giorgia)\nforall x (Impanel(x, mustafa) -> Combine(x, mustafa))\nCombine(mustafa, giorgia) and English(giorgia) -> Combine(mustafa, selig)\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Oscillate(x, mustafa) -> English(mustafa))\nforall x (Combine(x, selig) -> Oscillate(x, lonna))\n\nOscillate(lonna, lonna)\n\nCombine(lonna, selig) and forall x (Combine(x, selig) -> Oscillate(x, lonna)) -> therefore Oscillate(lonna, lonna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The christof slave the greg. The greg is horrid. The greg garment the bart. The bart encode the kirstin. The bart garment the kirstin. The bart slave the kirstin. The kirstin is twiggy. The kirstin is undersized. The kirstin encode the bart. The kirstin garment the greg. If something slave the greg and it encode the greg then the greg slave the bart. If something slave the bart then it garment the christof. If something encode the greg then it slave the greg. If the christof garment the bart and the bart is cypriote then the bart encode the christof. If something slave the greg then it encode the greg. If the greg encode the christof and the christof is cypriote then the greg encode the bart. If something is twiggy and it garment the greg then the greg is cypriote. If something encode the bart then it garment the kirstin. The christof does not like the greg.", "logic": "\nSlave(christof, greg)\nHorrid(greg)\nGarment(greg, bart)\nEncode(bart, kirstin)\nGarment(bart, kirstin)\nSlave(bart, kirstin)\nTwiggy(kirstin)\nUndersized(kirstin)\nEncode(kirstin, bart)\nGarment(kirstin, greg)\nforall x (Slave(x, greg) and Encode(x, greg) -> Slave(greg, bart))\nforall x (Slave(x, bart) -> Garment(x, christof))\nforall x (Encode(x, greg) -> Slave(x, greg))\nGarment(christof, bart) and Cypriote(bart) -> Encode(bart, christof)\nforall x (Slave(x, greg) -> Encode(x, greg))\nEncode(greg, christof) and Cypriote(christof) -> Encode(greg, bart)\nforall x (Twiggy(x) and Garment(x, greg) -> Cypriote(greg))\nforall x (Encode(x, bart) -> Garment(x, kirstin))\n\nnot Encode(christof, greg)\n\nSlave(christof, greg) and forall x (Slave(x, greg) -> Encode(x, greg)) -> therefore Encode(christof, greg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The wilfred sellotape the allys. The allys is pedagogic. The allys drawl the maxy. The maxy braise the elnar. The maxy drawl the elnar. The maxy sellotape the elnar. The elnar is postpartum. The elnar is biracial. The elnar braise the maxy. The elnar drawl the allys. If something sellotape the allys and it braise the allys then the allys sellotape the maxy. If something sellotape the maxy then it drawl the wilfred. If something braise the allys then it sellotape the allys. If the wilfred drawl the maxy and the maxy is umbellate then the maxy braise the wilfred. If something sellotape the allys then it braise the allys. If the allys braise the wilfred and the wilfred is umbellate then the allys braise the maxy. If something is postpartum and it drawl the allys then the allys is umbellate. If something braise the maxy then it drawl the elnar. The allys sellotape the maxy.", "logic": "\nSellotape(wilfred, allys)\nPedagogic(allys)\nDrawl(allys, maxy)\nBraise(maxy, elnar)\nDrawl(maxy, elnar)\nSellotape(maxy, elnar)\nPostpartum(elnar)\nBiracial(elnar)\nBraise(elnar, maxy)\nDrawl(elnar, allys)\nforall x (Sellotape(x, allys) and Braise(x, allys) -> Sellotape(allys, maxy))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, maxy) -> Drawl(x, wilfred))\nforall x (Braise(x, allys) -> Sellotape(x, allys))\nDrawl(wilfred, maxy) and Umbellate(maxy) -> Braise(maxy, wilfred)\nforall x (Sellotape(x, allys) -> Braise(x, allys))\nBraise(allys, wilfred) and Umbellate(wilfred) -> Braise(allys, maxy)\nforall x (Postpartum(x) and Drawl(x, allys) -> Umbellate(allys))\nforall x (Braise(x, maxy) -> Drawl(x, elnar))\n\nSellotape(allys, maxy)\n\nSellotape(wilfred, allys) and forall x (Sellotape(x, allys) -> Braise(x, allys)) -> therefore Braise(wilfred, allys) Sellotape(wilfred, allys) and Braise(wilfred, allys) and forall x (Sellotape(x, allys) and Braise(x, allys) -> Sellotape(allys, maxy)) -> therefore Sellotape(allys, maxy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The elfrieda dwarf the morly. The morly is funicular. The morly initial the alvinia. The alvinia incinerate the dyna. The alvinia initial the dyna. The alvinia dwarf the dyna. The dyna is biform. The dyna is inimical. The dyna incinerate the alvinia. The dyna initial the morly. If something dwarf the morly and it incinerate the morly then the morly dwarf the alvinia. If something dwarf the alvinia then it initial the elfrieda. If something incinerate the morly then it dwarf the morly. If the elfrieda initial the alvinia and the alvinia is bridgeable then the alvinia incinerate the elfrieda. If something dwarf the morly then it incinerate the morly. If the morly incinerate the elfrieda and the elfrieda is bridgeable then the morly incinerate the alvinia. If something is biform and it initial the morly then the morly is bridgeable. If something incinerate the alvinia then it initial the dyna. The morly does not visit the alvinia.", "logic": "\nDwarf(elfrieda, morly)\nFunicular(morly)\nInitial(morly, alvinia)\nIncinerate(alvinia, dyna)\nInitial(alvinia, dyna)\nDwarf(alvinia, dyna)\nBiform(dyna)\nInimical(dyna)\nIncinerate(dyna, alvinia)\nInitial(dyna, morly)\nforall x (Dwarf(x, morly) and Incinerate(x, morly) -> Dwarf(morly, alvinia))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, alvinia) -> Initial(x, elfrieda))\nforall x (Incinerate(x, morly) -> Dwarf(x, morly))\nInitial(elfrieda, alvinia) and Bridgeable(alvinia) -> Incinerate(alvinia, elfrieda)\nforall x (Dwarf(x, morly) -> Incinerate(x, morly))\nIncinerate(morly, elfrieda) and Bridgeable(elfrieda) -> Incinerate(morly, alvinia)\nforall x (Biform(x) and Initial(x, morly) -> Bridgeable(morly))\nforall x (Incinerate(x, alvinia) -> Initial(x, dyna))\n\nnot Dwarf(morly, alvinia)\n\nDwarf(elfrieda, morly) and forall x (Dwarf(x, morly) -> Incinerate(x, morly)) -> therefore Incinerate(elfrieda, morly) Dwarf(elfrieda, morly) and Incinerate(elfrieda, morly) and forall x (Dwarf(x, morly) and Incinerate(x, morly) -> Dwarf(morly, alvinia)) -> therefore Dwarf(morly, alvinia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The gavrielle wawl the maureene. The maureene is vegetative. The maureene mercerize the minette. The minette reverse the beryl. The minette mercerize the beryl. The minette wawl the beryl. The beryl is safe. The beryl is modish. The beryl reverse the minette. The beryl mercerize the maureene. If something wawl the maureene and it reverse the maureene then the maureene wawl the minette. If something wawl the minette then it mercerize the gavrielle. If something reverse the maureene then it wawl the maureene. If the gavrielle mercerize the minette and the minette is capsulate then the minette reverse the gavrielle. If something wawl the maureene then it reverse the maureene. If the maureene reverse the gavrielle and the gavrielle is capsulate then the maureene reverse the minette. If something is safe and it mercerize the maureene then the maureene is capsulate. If something reverse the minette then it mercerize the beryl. The maureene mercerize the gavrielle.", "logic": "\nWawl(gavrielle, maureene)\nVegetative(maureene)\nMercerize(maureene, minette)\nReverse(minette, beryl)\nMercerize(minette, beryl)\nWawl(minette, beryl)\nSafe(beryl)\nModish(beryl)\nReverse(beryl, minette)\nMercerize(beryl, maureene)\nforall x (Wawl(x, maureene) and Reverse(x, maureene) -> Wawl(maureene, minette))\nforall x (Wawl(x, minette) -> Mercerize(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Reverse(x, maureene) -> Wawl(x, maureene))\nMercerize(gavrielle, minette) and Capsulate(minette) -> Reverse(minette, gavrielle)\nforall x (Wawl(x, maureene) -> Reverse(x, maureene))\nReverse(maureene, gavrielle) and Capsulate(gavrielle) -> Reverse(maureene, minette)\nforall x (Safe(x) and Mercerize(x, maureene) -> Capsulate(maureene))\nforall x (Reverse(x, minette) -> Mercerize(x, beryl))\n\nMercerize(maureene, gavrielle)\n\nWawl(gavrielle, maureene) and forall x (Wawl(x, maureene) -> Reverse(x, maureene)) -> therefore Reverse(gavrielle, maureene) Wawl(gavrielle, maureene) and Reverse(gavrielle, maureene) and forall x (Wawl(x, maureene) and Reverse(x, maureene) -> Wawl(maureene, minette)) -> therefore Wawl(maureene, minette) Wawl(maureene, minette) and forall x (Wawl(x, minette) -> Mercerize(x, gavrielle)) -> therefore Mercerize(maureene, gavrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The philly impair the deena. The deena is crapulent. The deena pressure the ginevra. The ginevra befit the ivie. The ginevra pressure the ivie. The ginevra impair the ivie. The ivie is stuporous. The ivie is postwar. The ivie befit the ginevra. The ivie pressure the deena. If something impair the deena and it befit the deena then the deena impair the ginevra. If something impair the ginevra then it pressure the philly. If something befit the deena then it impair the deena. If the philly pressure the ginevra and the ginevra is activist then the ginevra befit the philly. If something impair the deena then it befit the deena. If the deena befit the philly and the philly is activist then the deena befit the ginevra. If something is stuporous and it pressure the deena then the deena is activist. If something befit the ginevra then it pressure the ivie. The deena does not see the philly.", "logic": "\nImpair(philly, deena)\nCrapulent(deena)\nPressure(deena, ginevra)\nBefit(ginevra, ivie)\nPressure(ginevra, ivie)\nImpair(ginevra, ivie)\nStuporous(ivie)\nPostwar(ivie)\nBefit(ivie, ginevra)\nPressure(ivie, deena)\nforall x (Impair(x, deena) and Befit(x, deena) -> Impair(deena, ginevra))\nforall x (Impair(x, ginevra) -> Pressure(x, philly))\nforall x (Befit(x, deena) -> Impair(x, deena))\nPressure(philly, ginevra) and Activist(ginevra) -> Befit(ginevra, philly)\nforall x (Impair(x, deena) -> Befit(x, deena))\nBefit(deena, philly) and Activist(philly) -> Befit(deena, ginevra)\nforall x (Stuporous(x) and Pressure(x, deena) -> Activist(deena))\nforall x (Befit(x, ginevra) -> Pressure(x, ivie))\n\nnot Pressure(deena, philly)\n\nImpair(philly, deena) and forall x (Impair(x, deena) -> Befit(x, deena)) -> therefore Befit(philly, deena) Impair(philly, deena) and Befit(philly, deena) and forall x (Impair(x, deena) and Befit(x, deena) -> Impair(deena, ginevra)) -> therefore Impair(deena, ginevra) Impair(deena, ginevra) and forall x (Impair(x, ginevra) -> Pressure(x, philly)) -> therefore Pressure(deena, philly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The aeriell guffaw the gerrie. The gerrie is southbound. The gerrie outspan the krissie. The krissie trawl the annabela. The krissie outspan the annabela. The krissie guffaw the annabela. The annabela is ploughed. The annabela is judgmental. The annabela trawl the krissie. The annabela outspan the gerrie. If something guffaw the gerrie and it trawl the gerrie then the gerrie guffaw the krissie. If something guffaw the krissie then it outspan the aeriell. If something trawl the gerrie then it guffaw the gerrie. If the aeriell outspan the krissie and the krissie is yelled then the krissie trawl the aeriell. If something guffaw the gerrie then it trawl the gerrie. If the gerrie trawl the aeriell and the aeriell is yelled then the gerrie trawl the krissie. If something is ploughed and it outspan the gerrie then the gerrie is yelled. If something trawl the krissie then it outspan the annabela. The gerrie does not like the gerrie.", "logic": "\nGuffaw(aeriell, gerrie)\nSouthbound(gerrie)\nOutspan(gerrie, krissie)\nTrawl(krissie, annabela)\nOutspan(krissie, annabela)\nGuffaw(krissie, annabela)\nPloughed(annabela)\nJudgmental(annabela)\nTrawl(annabela, krissie)\nOutspan(annabela, gerrie)\nforall x (Guffaw(x, gerrie) and Trawl(x, gerrie) -> Guffaw(gerrie, krissie))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, krissie) -> Outspan(x, aeriell))\nforall x (Trawl(x, gerrie) -> Guffaw(x, gerrie))\nOutspan(aeriell, krissie) and Yelled(krissie) -> Trawl(krissie, aeriell)\nforall x (Guffaw(x, gerrie) -> Trawl(x, gerrie))\nTrawl(gerrie, aeriell) and Yelled(aeriell) -> Trawl(gerrie, krissie)\nforall x (Ploughed(x) and Outspan(x, gerrie) -> Yelled(gerrie))\nforall x (Trawl(x, krissie) -> Outspan(x, annabela))\n\nnot Trawl(gerrie, gerrie)\n\nforall x (Guffaw(x, gerrie) -> Trawl(x, gerrie)) <- forall x (Trawl(x, gerrie) -> Guffaw(x, gerrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The moria frighten the gertrud. The gertrud is suchlike. The gertrud wigwag the lisandra. The lisandra pith the karee. The lisandra wigwag the karee. The lisandra frighten the karee. The karee is selfish. The karee is infuriated. The karee pith the lisandra. The karee wigwag the gertrud. If something frighten the gertrud and it pith the gertrud then the gertrud frighten the lisandra. If something frighten the lisandra then it wigwag the moria. If something pith the gertrud then it frighten the gertrud. If the moria wigwag the lisandra and the lisandra is dear then the lisandra pith the moria. If something frighten the gertrud then it pith the gertrud. If the gertrud pith the moria and the moria is dear then the gertrud pith the lisandra. If something is selfish and it wigwag the gertrud then the gertrud is dear. If something pith the lisandra then it wigwag the karee. The gertrud pith the lisandra.", "logic": "\nFrighten(moria, gertrud)\nSuchlike(gertrud)\nWigwag(gertrud, lisandra)\nPith(lisandra, karee)\nWigwag(lisandra, karee)\nFrighten(lisandra, karee)\nSelfish(karee)\nInfuriated(karee)\nPith(karee, lisandra)\nWigwag(karee, gertrud)\nforall x (Frighten(x, gertrud) and Pith(x, gertrud) -> Frighten(gertrud, lisandra))\nforall x (Frighten(x, lisandra) -> Wigwag(x, moria))\nforall x (Pith(x, gertrud) -> Frighten(x, gertrud))\nWigwag(moria, lisandra) and Dear(lisandra) -> Pith(lisandra, moria)\nforall x (Frighten(x, gertrud) -> Pith(x, gertrud))\nPith(gertrud, moria) and Dear(moria) -> Pith(gertrud, lisandra)\nforall x (Selfish(x) and Wigwag(x, gertrud) -> Dear(gertrud))\nforall x (Pith(x, lisandra) -> Wigwag(x, karee))\n\nPith(gertrud, lisandra)\n\nPith(gertrud, moria) and Dear(moria) -> Pith(gertrud, lisandra) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The leshia unbend the donelle. The donelle is wedded. The donelle constrain the juanita. The juanita categorise the bettine. The juanita constrain the bettine. The juanita unbend the bettine. The bettine is perfected. The bettine is isoclinic. The bettine categorise the juanita. The bettine constrain the donelle. If something unbend the donelle and it categorise the donelle then the donelle unbend the juanita. If something unbend the juanita then it constrain the leshia. If something categorise the donelle then it unbend the donelle. If the leshia constrain the juanita and the juanita is glomerular then the juanita categorise the leshia. If something unbend the donelle then it categorise the donelle. If the donelle categorise the leshia and the leshia is glomerular then the donelle categorise the juanita. If something is perfected and it constrain the donelle then the donelle is glomerular. If something categorise the juanita then it constrain the bettine. The juanita does not like the donelle.", "logic": "\nUnbend(leshia, donelle)\nWedded(donelle)\nConstrain(donelle, juanita)\nCategorise(juanita, bettine)\nConstrain(juanita, bettine)\nUnbend(juanita, bettine)\nPerfected(bettine)\nIsoclinic(bettine)\nCategorise(bettine, juanita)\nConstrain(bettine, donelle)\nforall x (Unbend(x, donelle) and Categorise(x, donelle) -> Unbend(donelle, juanita))\nforall x (Unbend(x, juanita) -> Constrain(x, leshia))\nforall x (Categorise(x, donelle) -> Unbend(x, donelle))\nConstrain(leshia, juanita) and Glomerular(juanita) -> Categorise(juanita, leshia)\nforall x (Unbend(x, donelle) -> Categorise(x, donelle))\nCategorise(donelle, leshia) and Glomerular(leshia) -> Categorise(donelle, juanita)\nforall x (Perfected(x) and Constrain(x, donelle) -> Glomerular(donelle))\nforall x (Categorise(x, juanita) -> Constrain(x, bettine))\n\nnot Categorise(juanita, donelle)\n\nforall x (Unbend(x, donelle) -> Categorise(x, donelle)) <- forall x (Categorise(x, donelle) -> Unbend(x, donelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The conny whipsaw the lola. The lola is falconine. The lola bias the loise. The loise toady the keelia. The loise bias the keelia. The loise whipsaw the keelia. The keelia is sublime. The keelia is snoopy. The keelia toady the loise. The keelia bias the lola. If something whipsaw the lola and it toady the lola then the lola whipsaw the loise. If something whipsaw the loise then it bias the conny. If something toady the lola then it whipsaw the lola. If the conny bias the loise and the loise is saltlike then the loise toady the conny. If something whipsaw the lola then it toady the lola. If the lola toady the conny and the conny is saltlike then the lola toady the loise. If something is sublime and it bias the lola then the lola is saltlike. If something toady the loise then it bias the keelia. The loise whipsaw the lola.", "logic": "\nWhipsaw(conny, lola)\nFalconine(lola)\nBias(lola, loise)\nToady(loise, keelia)\nBias(loise, keelia)\nWhipsaw(loise, keelia)\nSublime(keelia)\nSnoopy(keelia)\nToady(keelia, loise)\nBias(keelia, lola)\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, lola) and Toady(x, lola) -> Whipsaw(lola, loise))\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, loise) -> Bias(x, conny))\nforall x (Toady(x, lola) -> Whipsaw(x, lola))\nBias(conny, loise) and Saltlike(loise) -> Toady(loise, conny)\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, lola) -> Toady(x, lola))\nToady(lola, conny) and Saltlike(conny) -> Toady(lola, loise)\nforall x (Sublime(x) and Bias(x, lola) -> Saltlike(lola))\nforall x (Toady(x, loise) -> Bias(x, keelia))\n\nWhipsaw(loise, lola)\n\nforall x (Toady(x, lola) -> Whipsaw(x, lola)) <- forall x (Whipsaw(x, lola) -> Toady(x, lola)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The trent snuffle the blayne. The blayne is sissy. The blayne crown the barbette. The barbette skyjack the corrianne. The barbette crown the corrianne. The barbette snuffle the corrianne. The corrianne is apraxic. The corrianne is biogenic. The corrianne skyjack the barbette. The corrianne crown the blayne. If something snuffle the blayne and it skyjack the blayne then the blayne snuffle the barbette. If something snuffle the barbette then it crown the trent. If something skyjack the blayne then it snuffle the blayne. If the trent crown the barbette and the barbette is titled then the barbette skyjack the trent. If something snuffle the blayne then it skyjack the blayne. If the blayne skyjack the trent and the trent is titled then the blayne skyjack the barbette. If something is apraxic and it crown the blayne then the blayne is titled. If something skyjack the barbette then it crown the corrianne. The corrianne does not see the barbette.", "logic": "\nSnuffle(trent, blayne)\nSissy(blayne)\nCrown(blayne, barbette)\nSkyjack(barbette, corrianne)\nCrown(barbette, corrianne)\nSnuffle(barbette, corrianne)\nApraxic(corrianne)\nBiogenic(corrianne)\nSkyjack(corrianne, barbette)\nCrown(corrianne, blayne)\nforall x (Snuffle(x, blayne) and Skyjack(x, blayne) -> Snuffle(blayne, barbette))\nforall x (Snuffle(x, barbette) -> Crown(x, trent))\nforall x (Skyjack(x, blayne) -> Snuffle(x, blayne))\nCrown(trent, barbette) and Titled(barbette) -> Skyjack(barbette, trent)\nforall x (Snuffle(x, blayne) -> Skyjack(x, blayne))\nSkyjack(blayne, trent) and Titled(trent) -> Skyjack(blayne, barbette)\nforall x (Apraxic(x) and Crown(x, blayne) -> Titled(blayne))\nforall x (Skyjack(x, barbette) -> Crown(x, corrianne))\n\nnot Crown(corrianne, barbette)\n\nnot Crown(corrianne, barbette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The kenny glamour the zahara. The zahara is northbound. The zahara deduct the lemuel. The lemuel avoid the cheslie. The lemuel deduct the cheslie. The lemuel glamour the cheslie. The cheslie is matted. The cheslie is patriotic. The cheslie avoid the lemuel. The cheslie deduct the zahara. If something glamour the zahara and it avoid the zahara then the zahara glamour the lemuel. If something glamour the lemuel then it deduct the kenny. If something avoid the zahara then it glamour the zahara. If the kenny deduct the lemuel and the lemuel is descending then the lemuel avoid the kenny. If something glamour the zahara then it avoid the zahara. If the zahara avoid the kenny and the kenny is descending then the zahara avoid the lemuel. If something is matted and it deduct the zahara then the zahara is descending. If something avoid the lemuel then it deduct the cheslie. The zahara avoid the cheslie.", "logic": "\nGlamour(kenny, zahara)\nNorthbound(zahara)\nDeduct(zahara, lemuel)\nAvoid(lemuel, cheslie)\nDeduct(lemuel, cheslie)\nGlamour(lemuel, cheslie)\nMatted(cheslie)\nPatriotic(cheslie)\nAvoid(cheslie, lemuel)\nDeduct(cheslie, zahara)\nforall x (Glamour(x, zahara) and Avoid(x, zahara) -> Glamour(zahara, lemuel))\nforall x (Glamour(x, lemuel) -> Deduct(x, kenny))\nforall x (Avoid(x, zahara) -> Glamour(x, zahara))\nDeduct(kenny, lemuel) and Descending(lemuel) -> Avoid(lemuel, kenny)\nforall x (Glamour(x, zahara) -> Avoid(x, zahara))\nAvoid(zahara, kenny) and Descending(kenny) -> Avoid(zahara, lemuel)\nforall x (Matted(x) and Deduct(x, zahara) -> Descending(zahara))\nforall x (Avoid(x, lemuel) -> Deduct(x, cheslie))\n\nAvoid(zahara, cheslie)\n\nAvoid(zahara, cheslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The gregorio chide the janeva. The janeva is coarse. The janeva scheme the inge. The inge presume the geoff. The inge scheme the geoff. The inge chide the geoff. The geoff is thoriated. The geoff is incensed. The geoff presume the inge. The geoff scheme the janeva. If something chide the janeva and it presume the janeva then the janeva chide the inge. If something chide the inge then it scheme the gregorio. If something presume the janeva then it chide the janeva. If the gregorio scheme the inge and the inge is diverting then the inge presume the gregorio. If something chide the janeva then it presume the janeva. If the janeva presume the gregorio and the gregorio is diverting then the janeva presume the inge. If something is thoriated and it scheme the janeva then the janeva is diverting. If something presume the inge then it scheme the geoff. The janeva does not visit the geoff.", "logic": "\nChide(gregorio, janeva)\nCoarse(janeva)\nScheme(janeva, inge)\nPresume(inge, geoff)\nScheme(inge, geoff)\nChide(inge, geoff)\nThoriated(geoff)\nIncensed(geoff)\nPresume(geoff, inge)\nScheme(geoff, janeva)\nforall x (Chide(x, janeva) and Presume(x, janeva) -> Chide(janeva, inge))\nforall x (Chide(x, inge) -> Scheme(x, gregorio))\nforall x (Presume(x, janeva) -> Chide(x, janeva))\nScheme(gregorio, inge) and Diverting(inge) -> Presume(inge, gregorio)\nforall x (Chide(x, janeva) -> Presume(x, janeva))\nPresume(janeva, gregorio) and Diverting(gregorio) -> Presume(janeva, inge)\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Scheme(x, janeva) -> Diverting(janeva))\nforall x (Presume(x, inge) -> Scheme(x, geoff))\n\nnot Chide(janeva, geoff)\n\nnot Chide(janeva, geoff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The thedrick reconvert the herb. The herb is platyrhine. The herb unspell the james. The james angulate the jaleh. The james unspell the jaleh. The james reconvert the jaleh. The jaleh is inflated. The jaleh is lemony. The jaleh angulate the james. The jaleh unspell the herb. If something reconvert the herb and it angulate the herb then the herb reconvert the james. If something reconvert the james then it unspell the thedrick. If something angulate the herb then it reconvert the herb. If the thedrick unspell the james and the james is heroic then the james angulate the thedrick. If something reconvert the herb then it angulate the herb. If the herb angulate the thedrick and the thedrick is heroic then the herb angulate the james. If something is inflated and it unspell the herb then the herb is heroic. If something angulate the james then it unspell the jaleh. The jaleh reconvert the jaleh.", "logic": "\nReconvert(thedrick, herb)\nPlatyrhine(herb)\nUnspell(herb, james)\nAngulate(james, jaleh)\nUnspell(james, jaleh)\nReconvert(james, jaleh)\nInflated(jaleh)\nLemony(jaleh)\nAngulate(jaleh, james)\nUnspell(jaleh, herb)\nforall x (Reconvert(x, herb) and Angulate(x, herb) -> Reconvert(herb, james))\nforall x (Reconvert(x, james) -> Unspell(x, thedrick))\nforall x (Angulate(x, herb) -> Reconvert(x, herb))\nUnspell(thedrick, james) and Heroic(james) -> Angulate(james, thedrick)\nforall x (Reconvert(x, herb) -> Angulate(x, herb))\nAngulate(herb, thedrick) and Heroic(thedrick) -> Angulate(herb, james)\nforall x (Inflated(x) and Unspell(x, herb) -> Heroic(herb))\nforall x (Angulate(x, james) -> Unspell(x, jaleh))\n\nReconvert(jaleh, jaleh)\n\nReconvert(jaleh, jaleh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-234"} {"premises": "The debbie does not eat the orelle. The orelle divest the debbie. The orelle empanel the debbie. The orelle is symbolical. The orelle is dipylon. The orelle is additional. The orelle hoot the debbie. All symbolical things are not symbolic. If something empanel the orelle and it is symbolical then it is additional. If something empanel the debbie then the debbie hoot the orelle. If something is inst then it hoot the debbie. If something is dipylon then it does not eat the orelle. If something hoot the orelle then it is symbolical. The orelle is symbolical.", "logic": "\nnot Empanel(debbie, orelle)\nDivest(orelle, debbie)\nEmpanel(orelle, debbie)\nSymbolical(orelle)\nDipylon(orelle)\nAdditional(orelle)\nHoot(orelle, debbie)\nforall x (Symbolical(x) -> not Symbolic(x))\nforall x (Empanel(x, orelle) and Symbolical(x) -> Additional(x))\nforall x (Empanel(x, debbie) -> Hoot(debbie, orelle))\nforall x (Inst(x) -> Hoot(x, debbie))\nforall x (Dipylon(x) -> not Empanel(x, orelle))\nforall x (Hoot(x, orelle) -> Symbolical(x))\n\nSymbolical(orelle)\n\ntherefore Symbolical(orelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The selinda does not eat the trudi. The trudi split the selinda. The trudi file the selinda. The trudi is gyroscopic. The trudi is exsanguine. The trudi is sexual. The trudi replenish the selinda. All gyroscopic things are not flexible. If something file the trudi and it is gyroscopic then it is sexual. If something file the selinda then the selinda replenish the trudi. If something is loveless then it replenish the selinda. If something is exsanguine then it does not eat the trudi. If something replenish the trudi then it is gyroscopic. The trudi is not sexual.", "logic": "\nnot File(selinda, trudi)\nSplit(trudi, selinda)\nFile(trudi, selinda)\nGyroscopic(trudi)\nExsanguine(trudi)\nSexual(trudi)\nReplenish(trudi, selinda)\nforall x (Gyroscopic(x) -> not Flexible(x))\nforall x (File(x, trudi) and Gyroscopic(x) -> Sexual(x))\nforall x (File(x, selinda) -> Replenish(selinda, trudi))\nforall x (Loveless(x) -> Replenish(x, selinda))\nforall x (Exsanguine(x) -> not File(x, trudi))\nforall x (Replenish(x, trudi) -> Gyroscopic(x))\n\nnot Sexual(trudi)\n\ntherefore Sexual(trudi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The eugenie does not eat the rani. The rani catalyse the eugenie. The rani underact the eugenie. The rani is canopied. The rani is thick. The rani is unveiled. The rani sober the eugenie. All canopied things are not tardy. If something underact the rani and it is canopied then it is unveiled. If something underact the eugenie then the eugenie sober the rani. If something is live then it sober the eugenie. If something is thick then it does not eat the rani. If something sober the rani then it is canopied. The rani does not eat the rani.", "logic": "\nnot Underact(eugenie, rani)\nCatalyse(rani, eugenie)\nUnderact(rani, eugenie)\nCanopied(rani)\nThick(rani)\nUnveiled(rani)\nSober(rani, eugenie)\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> not Tardy(x))\nforall x (Underact(x, rani) and Canopied(x) -> Unveiled(x))\nforall x (Underact(x, eugenie) -> Sober(eugenie, rani))\nforall x (Live(x) -> Sober(x, eugenie))\nforall x (Thick(x) -> not Underact(x, rani))\nforall x (Sober(x, rani) -> Canopied(x))\n\nnot Underact(rani, rani)\n\nThick(rani) and forall x (Thick(x) -> not Underact(x, rani)) -> therefore not Underact(rani, rani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The shirley does not eat the augustin. The augustin bench the shirley. The augustin speck the shirley. The augustin is stovepiped. The augustin is outspread. The augustin is handed. The augustin unpack the shirley. All stovepiped things are not maleficent. If something speck the augustin and it is stovepiped then it is handed. If something speck the shirley then the shirley unpack the augustin. If something is despairing then it unpack the shirley. If something is outspread then it does not eat the augustin. If something unpack the augustin then it is stovepiped. The augustin speck the augustin.", "logic": "\nnot Speck(shirley, augustin)\nBench(augustin, shirley)\nSpeck(augustin, shirley)\nStovepiped(augustin)\nOutspread(augustin)\nHanded(augustin)\nUnpack(augustin, shirley)\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> not Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Speck(x, augustin) and Stovepiped(x) -> Handed(x))\nforall x (Speck(x, shirley) -> Unpack(shirley, augustin))\nforall x (Despairing(x) -> Unpack(x, shirley))\nforall x (Outspread(x) -> not Speck(x, augustin))\nforall x (Unpack(x, augustin) -> Stovepiped(x))\n\nSpeck(augustin, augustin)\n\nOutspread(augustin) and forall x (Outspread(x) -> not Speck(x, augustin)) -> therefore not Speck(augustin, augustin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The karissa does not eat the latashia. The latashia meter the karissa. The latashia breed the karissa. The latashia is merging. The latashia is aflicker. The latashia is nucleated. The latashia orbit the karissa. All merging things are not empiric. If something breed the latashia and it is merging then it is nucleated. If something breed the karissa then the karissa orbit the latashia. If something is grown then it orbit the karissa. If something is aflicker then it does not eat the latashia. If something orbit the latashia then it is merging. The karissa is merging.", "logic": "\nnot Breed(karissa, latashia)\nMeter(latashia, karissa)\nBreed(latashia, karissa)\nMerging(latashia)\nAflicker(latashia)\nNucleated(latashia)\nOrbit(latashia, karissa)\nforall x (Merging(x) -> not Empiric(x))\nforall x (Breed(x, latashia) and Merging(x) -> Nucleated(x))\nforall x (Breed(x, karissa) -> Orbit(karissa, latashia))\nforall x (Grown(x) -> Orbit(x, karissa))\nforall x (Aflicker(x) -> not Breed(x, latashia))\nforall x (Orbit(x, latashia) -> Merging(x))\n\nMerging(karissa)\n\nBreed(latashia, karissa) and forall x (Breed(x, karissa) -> Orbit(karissa, latashia)) -> therefore Orbit(karissa, latashia) Orbit(karissa, latashia) and forall x (Orbit(x, latashia) -> Merging(x)) -> therefore Merging(karissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The cassandra does not eat the gretchen. The gretchen singe the cassandra. The gretchen swot the cassandra. The gretchen is nonliving. The gretchen is quasi. The gretchen is auditive. The gretchen parrot the cassandra. All nonliving things are not tartarean. If something swot the gretchen and it is nonliving then it is auditive. If something swot the cassandra then the cassandra parrot the gretchen. If something is kinetic then it parrot the cassandra. If something is quasi then it does not eat the gretchen. If something parrot the gretchen then it is nonliving. The cassandra is not nonliving.", "logic": "\nnot Swot(cassandra, gretchen)\nSinge(gretchen, cassandra)\nSwot(gretchen, cassandra)\nNonliving(gretchen)\nQuasi(gretchen)\nAuditive(gretchen)\nParrot(gretchen, cassandra)\nforall x (Nonliving(x) -> not Tartarean(x))\nforall x (Swot(x, gretchen) and Nonliving(x) -> Auditive(x))\nforall x (Swot(x, cassandra) -> Parrot(cassandra, gretchen))\nforall x (Kinetic(x) -> Parrot(x, cassandra))\nforall x (Quasi(x) -> not Swot(x, gretchen))\nforall x (Parrot(x, gretchen) -> Nonliving(x))\n\nnot Nonliving(cassandra)\n\nSwot(gretchen, cassandra) and forall x (Swot(x, cassandra) -> Parrot(cassandra, gretchen)) -> therefore Parrot(cassandra, gretchen) Parrot(cassandra, gretchen) and forall x (Parrot(x, gretchen) -> Nonliving(x)) -> therefore Nonliving(cassandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The theresa does not eat the koressa. The koressa sully the theresa. The koressa antecede the theresa. The koressa is overhand. The koressa is unspoilt. The koressa is adscript. The koressa slag the theresa. All overhand things are not feeble. If something antecede the koressa and it is overhand then it is adscript. If something antecede the theresa then the theresa slag the koressa. If something is persisting then it slag the theresa. If something is unspoilt then it does not eat the koressa. If something slag the koressa then it is overhand. The theresa is not feeble.", "logic": "\nnot Antecede(theresa, koressa)\nSully(koressa, theresa)\nAntecede(koressa, theresa)\nOverhand(koressa)\nUnspoilt(koressa)\nAdscript(koressa)\nSlag(koressa, theresa)\nforall x (Overhand(x) -> not Feeble(x))\nforall x (Antecede(x, koressa) and Overhand(x) -> Adscript(x))\nforall x (Antecede(x, theresa) -> Slag(theresa, koressa))\nforall x (Persisting(x) -> Slag(x, theresa))\nforall x (Unspoilt(x) -> not Antecede(x, koressa))\nforall x (Slag(x, koressa) -> Overhand(x))\n\nnot Feeble(theresa)\n\nAntecede(koressa, theresa) and forall x (Antecede(x, theresa) -> Slag(theresa, koressa)) -> therefore Slag(theresa, koressa) Slag(theresa, koressa) and forall x (Slag(x, koressa) -> Overhand(x)) -> therefore Overhand(theresa) Overhand(theresa) and forall x (Overhand(x) -> not Feeble(x)) -> therefore not Feeble(theresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The lilli does not eat the shelly. The shelly wend the lilli. The shelly equip the lilli. The shelly is puerile. The shelly is awless. The shelly is dutiful. The shelly fail the lilli. All puerile things are not coastal. If something equip the shelly and it is puerile then it is dutiful. If something equip the lilli then the lilli fail the shelly. If something is zymotic then it fail the lilli. If something is awless then it does not eat the shelly. If something fail the shelly then it is puerile. The lilli is coastal.", "logic": "\nnot Equip(lilli, shelly)\nWend(shelly, lilli)\nEquip(shelly, lilli)\nPuerile(shelly)\nAwless(shelly)\nDutiful(shelly)\nFail(shelly, lilli)\nforall x (Puerile(x) -> not Coastal(x))\nforall x (Equip(x, shelly) and Puerile(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Equip(x, lilli) -> Fail(lilli, shelly))\nforall x (Zymotic(x) -> Fail(x, lilli))\nforall x (Awless(x) -> not Equip(x, shelly))\nforall x (Fail(x, shelly) -> Puerile(x))\n\nCoastal(lilli)\n\nEquip(shelly, lilli) and forall x (Equip(x, lilli) -> Fail(lilli, shelly)) -> therefore Fail(lilli, shelly) Fail(lilli, shelly) and forall x (Fail(x, shelly) -> Puerile(x)) -> therefore Puerile(lilli) Puerile(lilli) and forall x (Puerile(x) -> not Coastal(x)) -> therefore not Coastal(lilli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The teddie does not eat the johnny. The johnny shimmer the teddie. The johnny undeceive the teddie. The johnny is aneroid. The johnny is vibratory. The johnny is flawless. The johnny dumbfound the teddie. All aneroid things are not xvii. If something undeceive the johnny and it is aneroid then it is flawless. If something undeceive the teddie then the teddie dumbfound the johnny. If something is consummate then it dumbfound the teddie. If something is vibratory then it does not eat the johnny. If something dumbfound the johnny then it is aneroid. The teddie is not flawless.", "logic": "\nnot Undeceive(teddie, johnny)\nShimmer(johnny, teddie)\nUndeceive(johnny, teddie)\nAneroid(johnny)\nVibratory(johnny)\nFlawless(johnny)\nDumbfound(johnny, teddie)\nforall x (Aneroid(x) -> not Xvii(x))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, johnny) and Aneroid(x) -> Flawless(x))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, teddie) -> Dumbfound(teddie, johnny))\nforall x (Consummate(x) -> Dumbfound(x, teddie))\nforall x (Vibratory(x) -> not Undeceive(x, johnny))\nforall x (Dumbfound(x, johnny) -> Aneroid(x))\n\nnot Flawless(teddie)\n\nforall x (Undeceive(x, johnny) and Aneroid(x) -> Flawless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The aila does not eat the lesly. The lesly reunify the aila. The lesly theologize the aila. The lesly is jellylike. The lesly is doped. The lesly is slipping. The lesly perch the aila. All jellylike things are not unpitying. If something theologize the lesly and it is jellylike then it is slipping. If something theologize the aila then the aila perch the lesly. If something is prefrontal then it perch the aila. If something is doped then it does not eat the lesly. If something perch the lesly then it is jellylike. The aila perch the aila.", "logic": "\nnot Theologize(aila, lesly)\nReunify(lesly, aila)\nTheologize(lesly, aila)\nJellylike(lesly)\nDoped(lesly)\nSlipping(lesly)\nPerch(lesly, aila)\nforall x (Jellylike(x) -> not Unpitying(x))\nforall x (Theologize(x, lesly) and Jellylike(x) -> Slipping(x))\nforall x (Theologize(x, aila) -> Perch(aila, lesly))\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) -> Perch(x, aila))\nforall x (Doped(x) -> not Theologize(x, lesly))\nforall x (Perch(x, lesly) -> Jellylike(x))\n\nPerch(aila, aila)\n\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) -> Perch(x, aila)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The jordain does not eat the kinna. The kinna corner the jordain. The kinna cashier the jordain. The kinna is aramaean. The kinna is ruffled. The kinna is abreast. The kinna overexert the jordain. All aramaean things are not teenaged. If something cashier the kinna and it is aramaean then it is abreast. If something cashier the jordain then the jordain overexert the kinna. If something is viricidal then it overexert the jordain. If something is ruffled then it does not eat the kinna. If something overexert the kinna then it is aramaean. The jordain is not viricidal.", "logic": "\nnot Cashier(jordain, kinna)\nCorner(kinna, jordain)\nCashier(kinna, jordain)\nAramaean(kinna)\nRuffled(kinna)\nAbreast(kinna)\nOverexert(kinna, jordain)\nforall x (Aramaean(x) -> not Teenaged(x))\nforall x (Cashier(x, kinna) and Aramaean(x) -> Abreast(x))\nforall x (Cashier(x, jordain) -> Overexert(jordain, kinna))\nforall x (Viricidal(x) -> Overexert(x, jordain))\nforall x (Ruffled(x) -> not Cashier(x, kinna))\nforall x (Overexert(x, kinna) -> Aramaean(x))\n\nnot Viricidal(jordain)\n\nnot Viricidal(jordain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The rhett does not eat the ginnie. The ginnie install the rhett. The ginnie metricise the rhett. The ginnie is castrated. The ginnie is gravid. The ginnie is bland. The ginnie screen the rhett. All castrated things are not hard. If something metricise the ginnie and it is castrated then it is bland. If something metricise the rhett then the rhett screen the ginnie. If something is liliaceous then it screen the rhett. If something is gravid then it does not eat the ginnie. If something screen the ginnie then it is castrated. The rhett metricise the rhett.", "logic": "\nnot Metricise(rhett, ginnie)\nInstall(ginnie, rhett)\nMetricise(ginnie, rhett)\nCastrated(ginnie)\nGravid(ginnie)\nBland(ginnie)\nScreen(ginnie, rhett)\nforall x (Castrated(x) -> not Hard(x))\nforall x (Metricise(x, ginnie) and Castrated(x) -> Bland(x))\nforall x (Metricise(x, rhett) -> Screen(rhett, ginnie))\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) -> Screen(x, rhett))\nforall x (Gravid(x) -> not Metricise(x, ginnie))\nforall x (Screen(x, ginnie) -> Castrated(x))\n\nMetricise(rhett, rhett)\n\nMetricise(rhett, rhett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The annaliese does not eat the roth. The roth invaginate the annaliese. The roth deaf the annaliese. The roth is joined. The roth is botulinal. The roth is grabby. The roth impeach the annaliese. All joined things are not runcinate. If something deaf the roth and it is joined then it is grabby. If something deaf the annaliese then the annaliese impeach the roth. If something is rewarding then it impeach the annaliese. If something is botulinal then it does not eat the roth. If something impeach the roth then it is joined. The annaliese does not chase the annaliese.", "logic": "\nnot Deaf(annaliese, roth)\nInvaginate(roth, annaliese)\nDeaf(roth, annaliese)\nJoined(roth)\nBotulinal(roth)\nGrabby(roth)\nImpeach(roth, annaliese)\nforall x (Joined(x) -> not Runcinate(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x, roth) and Joined(x) -> Grabby(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x, annaliese) -> Impeach(annaliese, roth))\nforall x (Rewarding(x) -> Impeach(x, annaliese))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> not Deaf(x, roth))\nforall x (Impeach(x, roth) -> Joined(x))\n\nnot Invaginate(annaliese, annaliese)\n\nnot Invaginate(annaliese, annaliese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The amie does not eat the bela. The bela reprieve the amie. The bela remain the amie. The bela is dour. The bela is corymbose. The bela is fewest. The bela adjure the amie. All dour things are not militant. If something remain the bela and it is dour then it is fewest. If something remain the amie then the amie adjure the bela. If something is inhibitory then it adjure the amie. If something is corymbose then it does not eat the bela. If something adjure the bela then it is dour. The bela adjure the bela.", "logic": "\nnot Remain(amie, bela)\nReprieve(bela, amie)\nRemain(bela, amie)\nDour(bela)\nCorymbose(bela)\nFewest(bela)\nAdjure(bela, amie)\nforall x (Dour(x) -> not Militant(x))\nforall x (Remain(x, bela) and Dour(x) -> Fewest(x))\nforall x (Remain(x, amie) -> Adjure(amie, bela))\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) -> Adjure(x, amie))\nforall x (Corymbose(x) -> not Remain(x, bela))\nforall x (Adjure(x, bela) -> Dour(x))\n\nAdjure(bela, bela)\n\nAdjure(bela, bela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The whitney does not eat the purcell. The purcell lunch the whitney. The purcell terrorize the whitney. The purcell is visceral. The purcell is unparented. The purcell is maculate. The purcell replay the whitney. All visceral things are not offstage. If something terrorize the purcell and it is visceral then it is maculate. If something terrorize the whitney then the whitney replay the purcell. If something is acentric then it replay the whitney. If something is unparented then it does not eat the purcell. If something replay the purcell then it is visceral. The whitney is not unparented.", "logic": "\nnot Terrorize(whitney, purcell)\nLunch(purcell, whitney)\nTerrorize(purcell, whitney)\nVisceral(purcell)\nUnparented(purcell)\nMaculate(purcell)\nReplay(purcell, whitney)\nforall x (Visceral(x) -> not Offstage(x))\nforall x (Terrorize(x, purcell) and Visceral(x) -> Maculate(x))\nforall x (Terrorize(x, whitney) -> Replay(whitney, purcell))\nforall x (Acentric(x) -> Replay(x, whitney))\nforall x (Unparented(x) -> not Terrorize(x, purcell))\nforall x (Replay(x, purcell) -> Visceral(x))\n\nnot Unparented(whitney)\n\nnot Unparented(whitney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The miran does not eat the luigi. The luigi divide the miran. The luigi storm the miran. The luigi is noachian. The luigi is hitlerian. The luigi is glued. The luigi receipt the miran. All noachian things are not ethnic. If something storm the luigi and it is noachian then it is glued. If something storm the miran then the miran receipt the luigi. If something is bawdy then it receipt the miran. If something is hitlerian then it does not eat the luigi. If something receipt the luigi then it is noachian. The miran divide the luigi.", "logic": "\nnot Storm(miran, luigi)\nDivide(luigi, miran)\nStorm(luigi, miran)\nNoachian(luigi)\nHitlerian(luigi)\nGlued(luigi)\nReceipt(luigi, miran)\nforall x (Noachian(x) -> not Ethnic(x))\nforall x (Storm(x, luigi) and Noachian(x) -> Glued(x))\nforall x (Storm(x, miran) -> Receipt(miran, luigi))\nforall x (Bawdy(x) -> Receipt(x, miran))\nforall x (Hitlerian(x) -> not Storm(x, luigi))\nforall x (Receipt(x, luigi) -> Noachian(x))\n\nDivide(miran, luigi)\n\nDivide(miran, luigi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1245"} {"premises": "The julia ransack the betsey. The betsey toboggan the julia. If the julia is squabby then the julia toboggan the betsey. If someone ransack the betsey then the betsey is tipsy. If the julia toboggan the betsey and the betsey enlighten the julia then the betsey is unsecured. The julia ransack the betsey.", "logic": "\nRansack(julia, betsey)\nToboggan(betsey, julia)\nSquabby(julia) -> Toboggan(julia, betsey)\nforall x (Ransack(x, betsey) -> Tipsy(betsey))\nToboggan(julia, betsey) and Enlighten(betsey, julia) -> Unsecured(betsey)\n\nRansack(julia, betsey)\n\ntherefore Ransack(julia, betsey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1995"} {"premises": "The peta breach the leanne. The leanne estrange the peta. If the peta is tragic then the peta estrange the leanne. If someone breach the leanne then the leanne is pukka. If the peta estrange the leanne and the leanne legislate the peta then the leanne is shaky. The leanne does not need the peta.", "logic": "\nBreach(peta, leanne)\nEstrange(leanne, peta)\nTragic(peta) -> Estrange(peta, leanne)\nforall x (Breach(x, leanne) -> Pukka(leanne))\nEstrange(peta, leanne) and Legislate(leanne, peta) -> Shaky(leanne)\n\nnot Estrange(leanne, peta)\n\ntherefore Estrange(leanne, peta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1995"} {"premises": "The nathanial waffle the ardys. The ardys moulder the nathanial. If the nathanial is rousing then the nathanial moulder the ardys. If someone waffle the ardys then the ardys is latish. If the nathanial moulder the ardys and the ardys flush the nathanial then the ardys is then. The ardys is not then.", "logic": "\nWaffle(nathanial, ardys)\nMoulder(ardys, nathanial)\nRousing(nathanial) -> Moulder(nathanial, ardys)\nforall x (Waffle(x, ardys) -> Latish(ardys))\nMoulder(nathanial, ardys) and Flush(ardys, nathanial) -> Then(ardys)\n\nnot Then(ardys)\n\nMoulder(nathanial, ardys) and Flush(ardys, nathanial) -> Then(ardys) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1995"} {"premises": "The lita valuate the jennifer. The jennifer submerge the lita. If the lita is gritty then the lita submerge the jennifer. If someone valuate the jennifer then the jennifer is puranic. If the lita submerge the jennifer and the jennifer moon the lita then the jennifer is dustlike. The jennifer submerge the jennifer.", "logic": "\nValuate(lita, jennifer)\nSubmerge(jennifer, lita)\nGritty(lita) -> Submerge(lita, jennifer)\nforall x (Valuate(x, jennifer) -> Puranic(jennifer))\nSubmerge(lita, jennifer) and Moon(jennifer, lita) -> Dustlike(jennifer)\n\nSubmerge(jennifer, jennifer)\n\nSubmerge(jennifer, jennifer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1995"} {"premises": "Stephen is adsorbent. Joaquin is fourteenth. Lorianna is ablaze. Spiro is gifted. If Spiro is not fourteenth then Spiro is not vague. Green people are ablaze. If Spiro is adsorbent then Spiro is carinal. Quiet people are vague. If someone is adsorbent then they are vague. If Lorianna is gifted then Lorianna is carinal. Rough, fourteenth people are adsorbent. If Stephen is adsorbent and Stephen is not ablaze then Stephen is vague. Spiro is gifted.", "logic": "\nAdsorbent(stephen)\nFourteenth(joaquin)\nAblaze(lorianna)\nGifted(spiro)\nnot Fourteenth(spiro) -> not Vague(spiro)\nforall x (Fourteenth(x) -> Ablaze(x))\nAdsorbent(spiro) -> Carinal(spiro)\nforall x (Skinless(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Adsorbent(x) -> Vague(x))\nGifted(lorianna) -> Carinal(lorianna)\nforall x (Ablaze(x) and Fourteenth(x) -> Adsorbent(x))\nAdsorbent(stephen) and not Ablaze(stephen) -> Vague(stephen)\n\nGifted(spiro)\n\ntherefore Gifted(spiro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Boniface is upraised. Mellissa is robust. Jenette is coruscant. Micheline is unmarked. If Micheline is not robust then Micheline is not biaxate. Green people are coruscant. If Micheline is upraised then Micheline is rarefied. Quiet people are biaxate. If someone is upraised then they are biaxate. If Jenette is unmarked then Jenette is rarefied. Rough, robust people are upraised. If Boniface is upraised and Boniface is not coruscant then Boniface is biaxate. Mellissa is not robust.", "logic": "\nUpraised(boniface)\nRobust(mellissa)\nCoruscant(jenette)\nUnmarked(micheline)\nnot Robust(micheline) -> not Biaxate(micheline)\nforall x (Robust(x) -> Coruscant(x))\nUpraised(micheline) -> Rarefied(micheline)\nforall x (Magnetised(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nUnmarked(jenette) -> Rarefied(jenette)\nforall x (Coruscant(x) and Robust(x) -> Upraised(x))\nUpraised(boniface) and not Coruscant(boniface) -> Biaxate(boniface)\n\nnot Robust(mellissa)\n\ntherefore Robust(mellissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Randene is cooked. Stanly is easterly. Eolanda is slubbed. Blondell is tabby. If Blondell is not easterly then Blondell is not sudanese. Green people are slubbed. If Blondell is cooked then Blondell is wobbly. Quiet people are sudanese. If someone is cooked then they are sudanese. If Eolanda is tabby then Eolanda is wobbly. Rough, easterly people are cooked. If Randene is cooked and Randene is not slubbed then Randene is sudanese. Randene is sudanese.", "logic": "\nCooked(randene)\nEasterly(stanly)\nSlubbed(eolanda)\nTabby(blondell)\nnot Easterly(blondell) -> not Sudanese(blondell)\nforall x (Easterly(x) -> Slubbed(x))\nCooked(blondell) -> Wobbly(blondell)\nforall x (Newsless(x) -> Sudanese(x))\nforall x (Cooked(x) -> Sudanese(x))\nTabby(eolanda) -> Wobbly(eolanda)\nforall x (Slubbed(x) and Easterly(x) -> Cooked(x))\nCooked(randene) and not Slubbed(randene) -> Sudanese(randene)\n\nSudanese(randene)\n\nCooked(randene) and forall x (Cooked(x) -> Sudanese(x)) -> therefore Sudanese(randene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Joane is exocentric. Demetria is disunited. Kaari is clueless. Hastings is nicaraguan. If Hastings is not disunited then Hastings is not irritative. Green people are clueless. If Hastings is exocentric then Hastings is entire. Quiet people are irritative. If someone is exocentric then they are irritative. If Kaari is nicaraguan then Kaari is entire. Rough, disunited people are exocentric. If Joane is exocentric and Joane is not clueless then Joane is irritative. Demetria is not clueless.", "logic": "\nExocentric(joane)\nDisunited(demetria)\nClueless(kaari)\nNicaraguan(hastings)\nnot Disunited(hastings) -> not Irritative(hastings)\nforall x (Disunited(x) -> Clueless(x))\nExocentric(hastings) -> Entire(hastings)\nforall x (Malapropos(x) -> Irritative(x))\nforall x (Exocentric(x) -> Irritative(x))\nNicaraguan(kaari) -> Entire(kaari)\nforall x (Clueless(x) and Disunited(x) -> Exocentric(x))\nExocentric(joane) and not Clueless(joane) -> Irritative(joane)\n\nnot Clueless(demetria)\n\nDisunited(demetria) and forall x (Disunited(x) -> Clueless(x)) -> therefore Clueless(demetria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Cassey is disarrayed. Laurena is riveting. Ruddie is gluteal. Joby is reductive. If Joby is not riveting then Joby is not papistical. Green people are gluteal. If Joby is disarrayed then Joby is cephalic. Quiet people are papistical. If someone is disarrayed then they are papistical. If Ruddie is reductive then Ruddie is cephalic. Rough, riveting people are disarrayed. If Cassey is disarrayed and Cassey is not gluteal then Cassey is papistical. Laurena is disarrayed.", "logic": "\nDisarrayed(cassey)\nRiveting(laurena)\nGluteal(ruddie)\nReductive(joby)\nnot Riveting(joby) -> not Papistical(joby)\nforall x (Riveting(x) -> Gluteal(x))\nDisarrayed(joby) -> Cephalic(joby)\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Papistical(x))\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) -> Papistical(x))\nReductive(ruddie) -> Cephalic(ruddie)\nforall x (Gluteal(x) and Riveting(x) -> Disarrayed(x))\nDisarrayed(cassey) and not Gluteal(cassey) -> Papistical(cassey)\n\nDisarrayed(laurena)\n\nRiveting(laurena) and forall x (Riveting(x) -> Gluteal(x)) -> therefore Gluteal(laurena) Gluteal(laurena) and Riveting(laurena) and forall x (Gluteal(x) and Riveting(x) -> Disarrayed(x)) -> therefore Disarrayed(laurena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Leese is marvellous. Zonda is hebrew. Damaris is javan. Ugo is untidy. If Ugo is not hebrew then Ugo is not floppy. Green people are javan. If Ugo is marvellous then Ugo is hated. Quiet people are floppy. If someone is marvellous then they are floppy. If Damaris is untidy then Damaris is hated. Rough, hebrew people are marvellous. If Leese is marvellous and Leese is not javan then Leese is floppy. Zonda is not marvellous.", "logic": "\nMarvellous(leese)\nHebrew(zonda)\nJavan(damaris)\nUntidy(ugo)\nnot Hebrew(ugo) -> not Floppy(ugo)\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Javan(x))\nMarvellous(ugo) -> Hated(ugo)\nforall x (Apothecial(x) -> Floppy(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Floppy(x))\nUntidy(damaris) -> Hated(damaris)\nforall x (Javan(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Marvellous(x))\nMarvellous(leese) and not Javan(leese) -> Floppy(leese)\n\nnot Marvellous(zonda)\n\nHebrew(zonda) and forall x (Hebrew(x) -> Javan(x)) -> therefore Javan(zonda) Javan(zonda) and Hebrew(zonda) and forall x (Javan(x) and Hebrew(x) -> Marvellous(x)) -> therefore Marvellous(zonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Nanette is boughed. Marleen is laced. Madison is crookback. Barret is crustose. If Barret is not laced then Barret is not unbaffled. Green people are crookback. If Barret is boughed then Barret is acquired. Quiet people are unbaffled. If someone is boughed then they are unbaffled. If Madison is crustose then Madison is acquired. Rough, laced people are boughed. If Nanette is boughed and Nanette is not crookback then Nanette is unbaffled. Marleen is unbaffled.", "logic": "\nBoughed(nanette)\nLaced(marleen)\nCrookback(madison)\nCrustose(barret)\nnot Laced(barret) -> not Unbaffled(barret)\nforall x (Laced(x) -> Crookback(x))\nBoughed(barret) -> Acquired(barret)\nforall x (Frenetic(x) -> Unbaffled(x))\nforall x (Boughed(x) -> Unbaffled(x))\nCrustose(madison) -> Acquired(madison)\nforall x (Crookback(x) and Laced(x) -> Boughed(x))\nBoughed(nanette) and not Crookback(nanette) -> Unbaffled(nanette)\n\nUnbaffled(marleen)\n\nLaced(marleen) and forall x (Laced(x) -> Crookback(x)) -> therefore Crookback(marleen) Crookback(marleen) and Laced(marleen) and forall x (Crookback(x) and Laced(x) -> Boughed(x)) -> therefore Boughed(marleen) Boughed(marleen) and forall x (Boughed(x) -> Unbaffled(x)) -> therefore Unbaffled(marleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Winnifred is unhappy. Tierney is trusted. Ana is center. Steffi is inspired. If Steffi is not trusted then Steffi is not etiolate. Green people are center. If Steffi is unhappy then Steffi is tasteless. Quiet people are etiolate. If someone is unhappy then they are etiolate. If Ana is inspired then Ana is tasteless. Rough, trusted people are unhappy. If Winnifred is unhappy and Winnifred is not center then Winnifred is etiolate. Tierney is not etiolate.", "logic": "\nUnhappy(winnifred)\nTrusted(tierney)\nCenter(ana)\nInspired(steffi)\nnot Trusted(steffi) -> not Etiolate(steffi)\nforall x (Trusted(x) -> Center(x))\nUnhappy(steffi) -> Tasteless(steffi)\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Etiolate(x))\nforall x (Unhappy(x) -> Etiolate(x))\nInspired(ana) -> Tasteless(ana)\nforall x (Center(x) and Trusted(x) -> Unhappy(x))\nUnhappy(winnifred) and not Center(winnifred) -> Etiolate(winnifred)\n\nnot Etiolate(tierney)\n\nTrusted(tierney) and forall x (Trusted(x) -> Center(x)) -> therefore Center(tierney) Center(tierney) and Trusted(tierney) and forall x (Center(x) and Trusted(x) -> Unhappy(x)) -> therefore Unhappy(tierney) Unhappy(tierney) and forall x (Unhappy(x) -> Etiolate(x)) -> therefore Etiolate(tierney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Kincaid is lined. Edward is faecal. Rosabel is chimerical. Amy is mottled. If Amy is not faecal then Amy is not magnified. Green people are chimerical. If Amy is lined then Amy is tumultuous. Quiet people are magnified. If someone is lined then they are magnified. If Rosabel is mottled then Rosabel is tumultuous. Rough, faecal people are lined. If Kincaid is lined and Kincaid is not chimerical then Kincaid is magnified. Rosabel is not lined.", "logic": "\nLined(kincaid)\nFaecal(edward)\nChimerical(rosabel)\nMottled(amy)\nnot Faecal(amy) -> not Magnified(amy)\nforall x (Faecal(x) -> Chimerical(x))\nLined(amy) -> Tumultuous(amy)\nforall x (Billowing(x) -> Magnified(x))\nforall x (Lined(x) -> Magnified(x))\nMottled(rosabel) -> Tumultuous(rosabel)\nforall x (Chimerical(x) and Faecal(x) -> Lined(x))\nLined(kincaid) and not Chimerical(kincaid) -> Magnified(kincaid)\n\nnot Lined(rosabel)\n\nforall x (Chimerical(x) and Faecal(x) -> Lined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Estrella is martian. Wyn is insouciant. Noach is leal. Fletch is prismatic. If Fletch is not insouciant then Fletch is not filariid. Green people are leal. If Fletch is martian then Fletch is bogartian. Quiet people are filariid. If someone is martian then they are filariid. If Noach is prismatic then Noach is bogartian. Rough, insouciant people are martian. If Estrella is martian and Estrella is not leal then Estrella is filariid. Noach is bogartian.", "logic": "\nMartian(estrella)\nInsouciant(wyn)\nLeal(noach)\nPrismatic(fletch)\nnot Insouciant(fletch) -> not Filariid(fletch)\nforall x (Insouciant(x) -> Leal(x))\nMartian(fletch) -> Bogartian(fletch)\nforall x (Relaxed(x) -> Filariid(x))\nforall x (Martian(x) -> Filariid(x))\nPrismatic(noach) -> Bogartian(noach)\nforall x (Leal(x) and Insouciant(x) -> Martian(x))\nMartian(estrella) and not Leal(estrella) -> Filariid(estrella)\n\nBogartian(noach)\n\nPrismatic(noach) -> Bogartian(noach) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Gaspar is scabrous. Zacharie is permissive. Sara is covert. Luce is balding. If Luce is not permissive then Luce is not unreactive. Green people are covert. If Luce is scabrous then Luce is postural. Quiet people are unreactive. If someone is scabrous then they are unreactive. If Sara is balding then Sara is postural. Rough, permissive people are scabrous. If Gaspar is scabrous and Gaspar is not covert then Gaspar is unreactive. Luce is not unreactive.", "logic": "\nScabrous(gaspar)\nPermissive(zacharie)\nCovert(sara)\nBalding(luce)\nnot Permissive(luce) -> not Unreactive(luce)\nforall x (Permissive(x) -> Covert(x))\nScabrous(luce) -> Postural(luce)\nforall x (Brasslike(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nBalding(sara) -> Postural(sara)\nforall x (Covert(x) and Permissive(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nScabrous(gaspar) and not Covert(gaspar) -> Unreactive(gaspar)\n\nnot Unreactive(luce)\n\nforall x (Scabrous(x) -> Unreactive(x)) <- forall x (Covert(x) and Permissive(x) -> Scabrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Blancha is tireless. Karlene is aroused. Hanny is effortless. Becka is papillary. If Becka is not aroused then Becka is not chic. Green people are effortless. If Becka is tireless then Becka is incident. Quiet people are chic. If someone is tireless then they are chic. If Hanny is papillary then Hanny is incident. Rough, aroused people are tireless. If Blancha is tireless and Blancha is not effortless then Blancha is chic. Becka is incident.", "logic": "\nTireless(blancha)\nAroused(karlene)\nEffortless(hanny)\nPapillary(becka)\nnot Aroused(becka) -> not Chic(becka)\nforall x (Aroused(x) -> Effortless(x))\nTireless(becka) -> Incident(becka)\nforall x (Tortuous(x) -> Chic(x))\nforall x (Tireless(x) -> Chic(x))\nPapillary(hanny) -> Incident(hanny)\nforall x (Effortless(x) and Aroused(x) -> Tireless(x))\nTireless(blancha) and not Effortless(blancha) -> Chic(blancha)\n\nIncident(becka)\n\nTireless(becka) -> Incident(becka) <- forall x (Effortless(x) and Aroused(x) -> Tireless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Fenelia is fleshly. Louise is beatified. Lauraine is unsporting. Winne is saturnine. If Winne is not beatified then Winne is not unfunded. Green people are unsporting. If Winne is fleshly then Winne is dished. Quiet people are unfunded. If someone is fleshly then they are unfunded. If Lauraine is saturnine then Lauraine is dished. Rough, beatified people are fleshly. If Fenelia is fleshly and Fenelia is not unsporting then Fenelia is unfunded. Louise is not dished.", "logic": "\nFleshly(fenelia)\nBeatified(louise)\nUnsporting(lauraine)\nSaturnine(winne)\nnot Beatified(winne) -> not Unfunded(winne)\nforall x (Beatified(x) -> Unsporting(x))\nFleshly(winne) -> Dished(winne)\nforall x (Numerous(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Fleshly(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nSaturnine(lauraine) -> Dished(lauraine)\nforall x (Unsporting(x) and Beatified(x) -> Fleshly(x))\nFleshly(fenelia) and not Unsporting(fenelia) -> Unfunded(fenelia)\n\nnot Dished(louise)\n\nnot Dished(louise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Gerianna is unbiased. Menard is unsaleable. Torr is righteous. Terrence is shameless. If Terrence is not unsaleable then Terrence is not separable. Green people are righteous. If Terrence is unbiased then Terrence is pedantic. Quiet people are separable. If someone is unbiased then they are separable. If Torr is shameless then Torr is pedantic. Rough, unsaleable people are unbiased. If Gerianna is unbiased and Gerianna is not righteous then Gerianna is separable. Gerianna is metallike.", "logic": "\nUnbiased(gerianna)\nUnsaleable(menard)\nRighteous(torr)\nShameless(terrence)\nnot Unsaleable(terrence) -> not Separable(terrence)\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Righteous(x))\nUnbiased(terrence) -> Pedantic(terrence)\nforall x (Metallike(x) -> Separable(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Separable(x))\nShameless(torr) -> Pedantic(torr)\nforall x (Righteous(x) and Unsaleable(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nUnbiased(gerianna) and not Righteous(gerianna) -> Separable(gerianna)\n\nMetallike(gerianna)\n\nMetallike(gerianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Sheryl is suspended. Maurita is destroyed. Rozalin is teetotal. Carolan is cupric. If Carolan is not destroyed then Carolan is not rosaceous. Green people are teetotal. If Carolan is suspended then Carolan is theist. Quiet people are rosaceous. If someone is suspended then they are rosaceous. If Rozalin is cupric then Rozalin is theist. Rough, destroyed people are suspended. If Sheryl is suspended and Sheryl is not teetotal then Sheryl is rosaceous. Maurita is not cupric.", "logic": "\nSuspended(sheryl)\nDestroyed(maurita)\nTeetotal(rozalin)\nCupric(carolan)\nnot Destroyed(carolan) -> not Rosaceous(carolan)\nforall x (Destroyed(x) -> Teetotal(x))\nSuspended(carolan) -> Theist(carolan)\nforall x (Begrimed(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Suspended(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nCupric(rozalin) -> Theist(rozalin)\nforall x (Teetotal(x) and Destroyed(x) -> Suspended(x))\nSuspended(sheryl) and not Teetotal(sheryl) -> Rosaceous(sheryl)\n\nnot Cupric(maurita)\n\nnot Cupric(maurita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "Claudio is gladsome. Nadiya is spermatic. Shandee is executive. Aubrette is lxxxiv. If Aubrette is not spermatic then Aubrette is not alienating. Green people are executive. If Aubrette is gladsome then Aubrette is accusing. Quiet people are alienating. If someone is gladsome then they are alienating. If Shandee is lxxxiv then Shandee is accusing. Rough, spermatic people are gladsome. If Claudio is gladsome and Claudio is not executive then Claudio is alienating. Shandee is spermatic.", "logic": "\nGladsome(claudio)\nSpermatic(nadiya)\nExecutive(shandee)\nLxxxiv(aubrette)\nnot Spermatic(aubrette) -> not Alienating(aubrette)\nforall x (Spermatic(x) -> Executive(x))\nGladsome(aubrette) -> Accusing(aubrette)\nforall x (Puffy(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Gladsome(x) -> Alienating(x))\nLxxxiv(shandee) -> Accusing(shandee)\nforall x (Executive(x) and Spermatic(x) -> Gladsome(x))\nGladsome(claudio) and not Executive(claudio) -> Alienating(claudio)\n\nSpermatic(shandee)\n\nSpermatic(shandee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-207"} {"premises": "The octavia pique the koral. The koral is such. The valry pique the octavia. The daryl is such. If the valry pique the octavia and the valry is inventive then the octavia is inventive. If the koral pique the valry and the valry is motional then the koral overmaster the daryl. If something is perceptive then it overmaster the octavia. If something is motional then it clown the daryl. If something is perceptive and it overmaster the octavia then the octavia is perceptive. If something is inventive then it overmaster the octavia. If something pique the koral then the koral is perceptive. If something pique the daryl then it is such. The valry pique the octavia.", "logic": "\nPique(octavia, koral)\nSuch(koral)\nPique(valry, octavia)\nSuch(daryl)\nPique(valry, octavia) and Inventive(valry) -> Inventive(octavia)\nPique(koral, valry) and Motional(valry) -> Overmaster(koral, daryl)\nforall x (Perceptive(x) -> Overmaster(x, octavia))\nforall x (Motional(x) -> Clown(x, daryl))\nforall x (Perceptive(x) and Overmaster(x, octavia) -> Perceptive(octavia))\nforall x (Inventive(x) -> Overmaster(x, octavia))\nforall x (Pique(x, koral) -> Perceptive(koral))\nforall x (Pique(x, daryl) -> Such(x))\n\nPique(valry, octavia)\n\ntherefore Pique(valry, octavia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The aldus underpay the austine. The austine is umbellar. The lorette underpay the aldus. The conchita is umbellar. If the lorette underpay the aldus and the lorette is assorted then the aldus is assorted. If the austine underpay the lorette and the lorette is regimented then the austine troat the conchita. If something is cranky then it troat the aldus. If something is regimented then it overfeed the conchita. If something is cranky and it troat the aldus then the aldus is cranky. If something is assorted then it troat the aldus. If something underpay the austine then the austine is cranky. If something underpay the conchita then it is umbellar. The conchita is not umbellar.", "logic": "\nUnderpay(aldus, austine)\nUmbellar(austine)\nUnderpay(lorette, aldus)\nUmbellar(conchita)\nUnderpay(lorette, aldus) and Assorted(lorette) -> Assorted(aldus)\nUnderpay(austine, lorette) and Regimented(lorette) -> Troat(austine, conchita)\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> Troat(x, aldus))\nforall x (Regimented(x) -> Overfeed(x, conchita))\nforall x (Cranky(x) and Troat(x, aldus) -> Cranky(aldus))\nforall x (Assorted(x) -> Troat(x, aldus))\nforall x (Underpay(x, austine) -> Cranky(austine))\nforall x (Underpay(x, conchita) -> Umbellar(x))\n\nnot Umbellar(conchita)\n\ntherefore Umbellar(conchita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The alena brand the ashly. The ashly is dandyish. The bubba brand the alena. The glennis is dandyish. If the bubba brand the alena and the bubba is eightfold then the alena is eightfold. If the ashly brand the bubba and the bubba is touristed then the ashly escort the glennis. If something is lettered then it escort the alena. If something is touristed then it kowtow the glennis. If something is lettered and it escort the alena then the alena is lettered. If something is eightfold then it escort the alena. If something brand the ashly then the ashly is lettered. If something brand the glennis then it is dandyish. The ashly is lettered.", "logic": "\nBrand(alena, ashly)\nDandyish(ashly)\nBrand(bubba, alena)\nDandyish(glennis)\nBrand(bubba, alena) and Eightfold(bubba) -> Eightfold(alena)\nBrand(ashly, bubba) and Touristed(bubba) -> Escort(ashly, glennis)\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Escort(x, alena))\nforall x (Touristed(x) -> Kowtow(x, glennis))\nforall x (Lettered(x) and Escort(x, alena) -> Lettered(alena))\nforall x (Eightfold(x) -> Escort(x, alena))\nforall x (Brand(x, ashly) -> Lettered(ashly))\nforall x (Brand(x, glennis) -> Dandyish(x))\n\nLettered(ashly)\n\nBrand(alena, ashly) and forall x (Brand(x, ashly) -> Lettered(ashly)) -> therefore Lettered(ashly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The nerti sliver the tan. The tan is mercurial. The leroy sliver the nerti. The alethea is mercurial. If the leroy sliver the nerti and the leroy is obsolete then the nerti is obsolete. If the tan sliver the leroy and the leroy is picky then the tan orate the alethea. If something is intolerant then it orate the nerti. If something is picky then it stencil the alethea. If something is intolerant and it orate the nerti then the nerti is intolerant. If something is obsolete then it orate the nerti. If something sliver the tan then the tan is intolerant. If something sliver the alethea then it is mercurial. The tan is not intolerant.", "logic": "\nSliver(nerti, tan)\nMercurial(tan)\nSliver(leroy, nerti)\nMercurial(alethea)\nSliver(leroy, nerti) and Obsolete(leroy) -> Obsolete(nerti)\nSliver(tan, leroy) and Picky(leroy) -> Orate(tan, alethea)\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Orate(x, nerti))\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Stencil(x, alethea))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) and Orate(x, nerti) -> Intolerant(nerti))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) -> Orate(x, nerti))\nforall x (Sliver(x, tan) -> Intolerant(tan))\nforall x (Sliver(x, alethea) -> Mercurial(x))\n\nnot Intolerant(tan)\n\nSliver(nerti, tan) and forall x (Sliver(x, tan) -> Intolerant(tan)) -> therefore Intolerant(tan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The loella interrupt the slim. The slim is ranking. The tommi interrupt the loella. The skye is ranking. If the tommi interrupt the loella and the tommi is stranded then the loella is stranded. If the slim interrupt the tommi and the tommi is avid then the slim unbosom the skye. If something is uninviting then it unbosom the loella. If something is avid then it prink the skye. If something is uninviting and it unbosom the loella then the loella is uninviting. If something is stranded then it unbosom the loella. If something interrupt the slim then the slim is uninviting. If something interrupt the skye then it is ranking. The slim unbosom the loella.", "logic": "\nInterrupt(loella, slim)\nRanking(slim)\nInterrupt(tommi, loella)\nRanking(skye)\nInterrupt(tommi, loella) and Stranded(tommi) -> Stranded(loella)\nInterrupt(slim, tommi) and Avid(tommi) -> Unbosom(slim, skye)\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> Unbosom(x, loella))\nforall x (Avid(x) -> Prink(x, skye))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Unbosom(x, loella) -> Uninviting(loella))\nforall x (Stranded(x) -> Unbosom(x, loella))\nforall x (Interrupt(x, slim) -> Uninviting(slim))\nforall x (Interrupt(x, skye) -> Ranking(x))\n\nUnbosom(slim, loella)\n\nInterrupt(loella, slim) and forall x (Interrupt(x, slim) -> Uninviting(slim)) -> therefore Uninviting(slim) Uninviting(slim) and forall x (Uninviting(x) -> Unbosom(x, loella)) -> therefore Unbosom(slim, loella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The canada amortise the leora. The leora is bisulcate. The libbie amortise the canada. The dulcia is bisulcate. If the libbie amortise the canada and the libbie is turbulent then the canada is turbulent. If the leora amortise the libbie and the libbie is phonic then the leora awaken the dulcia. If something is abstracted then it awaken the canada. If something is phonic then it rescue the dulcia. If something is abstracted and it awaken the canada then the canada is abstracted. If something is turbulent then it awaken the canada. If something amortise the leora then the leora is abstracted. If something amortise the dulcia then it is bisulcate. The leora does not see the canada.", "logic": "\nAmortise(canada, leora)\nBisulcate(leora)\nAmortise(libbie, canada)\nBisulcate(dulcia)\nAmortise(libbie, canada) and Turbulent(libbie) -> Turbulent(canada)\nAmortise(leora, libbie) and Phonic(libbie) -> Awaken(leora, dulcia)\nforall x (Abstracted(x) -> Awaken(x, canada))\nforall x (Phonic(x) -> Rescue(x, dulcia))\nforall x (Abstracted(x) and Awaken(x, canada) -> Abstracted(canada))\nforall x (Turbulent(x) -> Awaken(x, canada))\nforall x (Amortise(x, leora) -> Abstracted(leora))\nforall x (Amortise(x, dulcia) -> Bisulcate(x))\n\nnot Awaken(leora, canada)\n\nAmortise(canada, leora) and forall x (Amortise(x, leora) -> Abstracted(leora)) -> therefore Abstracted(leora) Abstracted(leora) and forall x (Abstracted(x) -> Awaken(x, canada)) -> therefore Awaken(leora, canada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The morse spar the heath. The heath is corrosive. The irvine spar the morse. The zary is corrosive. If the irvine spar the morse and the irvine is yeasty then the morse is yeasty. If the heath spar the irvine and the irvine is purple then the heath disregard the zary. If something is pitchy then it disregard the morse. If something is purple then it silt the zary. If something is pitchy and it disregard the morse then the morse is pitchy. If something is yeasty then it disregard the morse. If something spar the heath then the heath is pitchy. If something spar the zary then it is corrosive. The morse is pitchy.", "logic": "\nSpar(morse, heath)\nCorrosive(heath)\nSpar(irvine, morse)\nCorrosive(zary)\nSpar(irvine, morse) and Yeasty(irvine) -> Yeasty(morse)\nSpar(heath, irvine) and Purple(irvine) -> Disregard(heath, zary)\nforall x (Pitchy(x) -> Disregard(x, morse))\nforall x (Purple(x) -> Silt(x, zary))\nforall x (Pitchy(x) and Disregard(x, morse) -> Pitchy(morse))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Disregard(x, morse))\nforall x (Spar(x, heath) -> Pitchy(heath))\nforall x (Spar(x, zary) -> Corrosive(x))\n\nPitchy(morse)\n\nSpar(morse, heath) and forall x (Spar(x, heath) -> Pitchy(heath)) -> therefore Pitchy(heath) Spar(morse, heath) and forall x (Spar(x, heath) -> Pitchy(heath)) -> therefore Pitchy(heath) Pitchy(heath) and forall x (Pitchy(x) -> Disregard(x, morse)) -> therefore Disregard(heath, morse) Pitchy(heath) and Disregard(heath, morse) and forall x (Pitchy(x) and Disregard(x, morse) -> Pitchy(morse)) -> therefore Pitchy(morse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The kristi boat the bernadine. The bernadine is feigned. The richardo boat the kristi. The isadora is feigned. If the richardo boat the kristi and the richardo is blockading then the kristi is blockading. If the bernadine boat the richardo and the richardo is capped then the bernadine crick the isadora. If something is totipotent then it crick the kristi. If something is capped then it bestow the isadora. If something is totipotent and it crick the kristi then the kristi is totipotent. If something is blockading then it crick the kristi. If something boat the bernadine then the bernadine is totipotent. If something boat the isadora then it is feigned. The kristi is not totipotent.", "logic": "\nBoat(kristi, bernadine)\nFeigned(bernadine)\nBoat(richardo, kristi)\nFeigned(isadora)\nBoat(richardo, kristi) and Blockading(richardo) -> Blockading(kristi)\nBoat(bernadine, richardo) and Capped(richardo) -> Crick(bernadine, isadora)\nforall x (Totipotent(x) -> Crick(x, kristi))\nforall x (Capped(x) -> Bestow(x, isadora))\nforall x (Totipotent(x) and Crick(x, kristi) -> Totipotent(kristi))\nforall x (Blockading(x) -> Crick(x, kristi))\nforall x (Boat(x, bernadine) -> Totipotent(bernadine))\nforall x (Boat(x, isadora) -> Feigned(x))\n\nnot Totipotent(kristi)\n\nBoat(kristi, bernadine) and forall x (Boat(x, bernadine) -> Totipotent(bernadine)) -> therefore Totipotent(bernadine) Boat(kristi, bernadine) and forall x (Boat(x, bernadine) -> Totipotent(bernadine)) -> therefore Totipotent(bernadine) Totipotent(bernadine) and forall x (Totipotent(x) -> Crick(x, kristi)) -> therefore Crick(bernadine, kristi) Totipotent(bernadine) and Crick(bernadine, kristi) and forall x (Totipotent(x) and Crick(x, kristi) -> Totipotent(kristi)) -> therefore Totipotent(kristi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The robinett infest the myles. The myles is precast. The nissa infest the robinett. The clarita is precast. If the nissa infest the robinett and the nissa is negro then the robinett is negro. If the myles infest the nissa and the nissa is paved then the myles entrench the clarita. If something is mutagenic then it entrench the robinett. If something is paved then it belly the clarita. If something is mutagenic and it entrench the robinett then the robinett is mutagenic. If something is negro then it entrench the robinett. If something infest the myles then the myles is mutagenic. If something infest the clarita then it is precast. The robinett is not precast.", "logic": "\nInfest(robinett, myles)\nPrecast(myles)\nInfest(nissa, robinett)\nPrecast(clarita)\nInfest(nissa, robinett) and Negro(nissa) -> Negro(robinett)\nInfest(myles, nissa) and Paved(nissa) -> Entrench(myles, clarita)\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) -> Entrench(x, robinett))\nforall x (Paved(x) -> Belly(x, clarita))\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and Entrench(x, robinett) -> Mutagenic(robinett))\nforall x (Negro(x) -> Entrench(x, robinett))\nforall x (Infest(x, myles) -> Mutagenic(myles))\nforall x (Infest(x, clarita) -> Precast(x))\n\nnot Precast(robinett)\n\nforall x (Infest(x, clarita) -> Precast(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The gweneth swag the chas. The chas is sonic. The somerset swag the gweneth. The gunilla is sonic. If the somerset swag the gweneth and the somerset is oneiric then the gweneth is oneiric. If the chas swag the somerset and the somerset is teasing then the chas rebound the gunilla. If something is boylike then it rebound the gweneth. If something is teasing then it spank the gunilla. If something is boylike and it rebound the gweneth then the gweneth is boylike. If something is oneiric then it rebound the gweneth. If something swag the chas then the chas is boylike. If something swag the gunilla then it is sonic. The somerset is sonic.", "logic": "\nSwag(gweneth, chas)\nSonic(chas)\nSwag(somerset, gweneth)\nSonic(gunilla)\nSwag(somerset, gweneth) and Oneiric(somerset) -> Oneiric(gweneth)\nSwag(chas, somerset) and Teasing(somerset) -> Rebound(chas, gunilla)\nforall x (Boylike(x) -> Rebound(x, gweneth))\nforall x (Teasing(x) -> Spank(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Boylike(x) and Rebound(x, gweneth) -> Boylike(gweneth))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) -> Rebound(x, gweneth))\nforall x (Swag(x, chas) -> Boylike(chas))\nforall x (Swag(x, gunilla) -> Sonic(x))\n\nSonic(somerset)\n\nforall x (Swag(x, gunilla) -> Sonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The broderick iodize the pippa. The pippa is underived. The morgen iodize the broderick. The vivian is underived. If the morgen iodize the broderick and the morgen is false then the broderick is false. If the pippa iodize the morgen and the morgen is incidental then the pippa gird the vivian. If something is devouring then it gird the broderick. If something is incidental then it blob the vivian. If something is devouring and it gird the broderick then the broderick is devouring. If something is false then it gird the broderick. If something iodize the pippa then the pippa is devouring. If something iodize the vivian then it is underived. The morgen does not eat the vivian.", "logic": "\nIodize(broderick, pippa)\nUnderived(pippa)\nIodize(morgen, broderick)\nUnderived(vivian)\nIodize(morgen, broderick) and False(morgen) -> False(broderick)\nIodize(pippa, morgen) and Incidental(morgen) -> Gird(pippa, vivian)\nforall x (Devouring(x) -> Gird(x, broderick))\nforall x (Incidental(x) -> Blob(x, vivian))\nforall x (Devouring(x) and Gird(x, broderick) -> Devouring(broderick))\nforall x (False(x) -> Gird(x, broderick))\nforall x (Iodize(x, pippa) -> Devouring(pippa))\nforall x (Iodize(x, vivian) -> Underived(x))\n\nnot Blob(morgen, vivian)\n\nforall x (Incidental(x) -> Blob(x, vivian)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The bendite reschedule the bunny. The bunny is pareve. The northrop reschedule the bendite. The sheril is pareve. If the northrop reschedule the bendite and the northrop is fourpenny then the bendite is fourpenny. If the bunny reschedule the northrop and the northrop is laboured then the bunny blaze the sheril. If something is eastside then it blaze the bendite. If something is laboured then it bream the sheril. If something is eastside and it blaze the bendite then the bendite is eastside. If something is fourpenny then it blaze the bendite. If something reschedule the bunny then the bunny is eastside. If something reschedule the sheril then it is pareve. The northrop blaze the bendite.", "logic": "\nReschedule(bendite, bunny)\nPareve(bunny)\nReschedule(northrop, bendite)\nPareve(sheril)\nReschedule(northrop, bendite) and Fourpenny(northrop) -> Fourpenny(bendite)\nReschedule(bunny, northrop) and Laboured(northrop) -> Blaze(bunny, sheril)\nforall x (Eastside(x) -> Blaze(x, bendite))\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> Bream(x, sheril))\nforall x (Eastside(x) and Blaze(x, bendite) -> Eastside(bendite))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) -> Blaze(x, bendite))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, bunny) -> Eastside(bunny))\nforall x (Reschedule(x, sheril) -> Pareve(x))\n\nBlaze(northrop, bendite)\n\nforall x (Eastside(x) -> Blaze(x, bendite)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The lars mumble the torry. The torry is cosmogenic. The arvy mumble the lars. The blake is cosmogenic. If the arvy mumble the lars and the arvy is logistic then the lars is logistic. If the torry mumble the arvy and the arvy is defeated then the torry imperil the blake. If something is antitrust then it imperil the lars. If something is defeated then it slump the blake. If something is antitrust and it imperil the lars then the lars is antitrust. If something is logistic then it imperil the lars. If something mumble the torry then the torry is antitrust. If something mumble the blake then it is cosmogenic. The arvy is not logistic.", "logic": "\nMumble(lars, torry)\nCosmogenic(torry)\nMumble(arvy, lars)\nCosmogenic(blake)\nMumble(arvy, lars) and Logistic(arvy) -> Logistic(lars)\nMumble(torry, arvy) and Defeated(arvy) -> Imperil(torry, blake)\nforall x (Antitrust(x) -> Imperil(x, lars))\nforall x (Defeated(x) -> Slump(x, blake))\nforall x (Antitrust(x) and Imperil(x, lars) -> Antitrust(lars))\nforall x (Logistic(x) -> Imperil(x, lars))\nforall x (Mumble(x, torry) -> Antitrust(torry))\nforall x (Mumble(x, blake) -> Cosmogenic(x))\n\nnot Logistic(arvy)\n\nnot Logistic(arvy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The orlando eavesdrop the butler. The butler is bonzer. The ginelle eavesdrop the orlando. The virgie is bonzer. If the ginelle eavesdrop the orlando and the ginelle is fazed then the orlando is fazed. If the butler eavesdrop the ginelle and the ginelle is correct then the butler tootle the virgie. If something is skinnerian then it tootle the orlando. If something is correct then it button the virgie. If something is skinnerian and it tootle the orlando then the orlando is skinnerian. If something is fazed then it tootle the orlando. If something eavesdrop the butler then the butler is skinnerian. If something eavesdrop the virgie then it is bonzer. The ginelle eavesdrop the virgie.", "logic": "\nEavesdrop(orlando, butler)\nBonzer(butler)\nEavesdrop(ginelle, orlando)\nBonzer(virgie)\nEavesdrop(ginelle, orlando) and Fazed(ginelle) -> Fazed(orlando)\nEavesdrop(butler, ginelle) and Correct(ginelle) -> Tootle(butler, virgie)\nforall x (Skinnerian(x) -> Tootle(x, orlando))\nforall x (Correct(x) -> Button(x, virgie))\nforall x (Skinnerian(x) and Tootle(x, orlando) -> Skinnerian(orlando))\nforall x (Fazed(x) -> Tootle(x, orlando))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, butler) -> Skinnerian(butler))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, virgie) -> Bonzer(x))\n\nEavesdrop(ginelle, virgie)\n\nEavesdrop(ginelle, virgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The gianina subvent the berget. The berget is feathered. The reginauld subvent the gianina. The winn is feathered. If the reginauld subvent the gianina and the reginauld is mercuric then the gianina is mercuric. If the berget subvent the reginauld and the reginauld is pithy then the berget dredge the winn. If something is rescued then it dredge the gianina. If something is pithy then it customize the winn. If something is rescued and it dredge the gianina then the gianina is rescued. If something is mercuric then it dredge the gianina. If something subvent the berget then the berget is rescued. If something subvent the winn then it is feathered. The gianina does not like the gianina.", "logic": "\nSubvent(gianina, berget)\nFeathered(berget)\nSubvent(reginauld, gianina)\nFeathered(winn)\nSubvent(reginauld, gianina) and Mercuric(reginauld) -> Mercuric(gianina)\nSubvent(berget, reginauld) and Pithy(reginauld) -> Dredge(berget, winn)\nforall x (Rescued(x) -> Dredge(x, gianina))\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> Customize(x, winn))\nforall x (Rescued(x) and Dredge(x, gianina) -> Rescued(gianina))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) -> Dredge(x, gianina))\nforall x (Subvent(x, berget) -> Rescued(berget))\nforall x (Subvent(x, winn) -> Feathered(x))\n\nnot Subvent(gianina, gianina)\n\nnot Subvent(gianina, gianina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "The serena ankylose the oliy. The oliy is executed. The moya ankylose the serena. The wald is executed. If the moya ankylose the serena and the moya is stimulant then the serena is stimulant. If the oliy ankylose the moya and the moya is immature then the oliy subluxate the wald. If something is clubfooted then it subluxate the serena. If something is immature then it consociate the wald. If something is clubfooted and it subluxate the serena then the serena is clubfooted. If something is stimulant then it subluxate the serena. If something ankylose the oliy then the oliy is clubfooted. If something ankylose the wald then it is executed. The wald ankylose the moya.", "logic": "\nAnkylose(serena, oliy)\nExecuted(oliy)\nAnkylose(moya, serena)\nExecuted(wald)\nAnkylose(moya, serena) and Stimulant(moya) -> Stimulant(serena)\nAnkylose(oliy, moya) and Immature(moya) -> Subluxate(oliy, wald)\nforall x (Clubfooted(x) -> Subluxate(x, serena))\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Consociate(x, wald))\nforall x (Clubfooted(x) and Subluxate(x, serena) -> Clubfooted(serena))\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> Subluxate(x, serena))\nforall x (Ankylose(x, oliy) -> Clubfooted(oliy))\nforall x (Ankylose(x, wald) -> Executed(x))\n\nAnkylose(wald, moya)\n\nAnkylose(wald, moya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-773"} {"premises": "Derrol is caddish. Stephana is albanian. Kam is twenty. Green people are crabwise. If someone is roughened and caddish then they are albanian. If someone is crabwise then they are albanian. Cold, albanian people are roughened. All glum people are roughened. All glum people are not caddish. All glum people are alike. Smart, crabwise people are not alike. Stephana is albanian.", "logic": "\nCaddish(derrol)\nAlbanian(stephana)\nTwenty(kam)\nforall x (Caddish(x) -> Crabwise(x))\nforall x (Roughened(x) and Caddish(x) -> Albanian(x))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) -> Albanian(x))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) and Albanian(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Glum(x) -> Roughened(x))\nforall x (Glum(x) -> not Caddish(x))\nforall x (Glum(x) -> Alike(x))\nforall x (Glum(x) and Crabwise(x) -> not Alike(x))\n\nAlbanian(stephana)\n\ntherefore Albanian(stephana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Garcia is circadian. Lotti is elementary. Tomasina is invisible. Green people are perfidious. If someone is nonresiny and circadian then they are elementary. If someone is perfidious then they are elementary. Cold, elementary people are nonresiny. All melting people are nonresiny. All melting people are not circadian. All melting people are decent. Smart, perfidious people are not decent. Lotti is not elementary.", "logic": "\nCircadian(garcia)\nElementary(lotti)\nInvisible(tomasina)\nforall x (Circadian(x) -> Perfidious(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Circadian(x) -> Elementary(x))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) -> Elementary(x))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) and Elementary(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Nonresiny(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> not Circadian(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) and Perfidious(x) -> not Decent(x))\n\nnot Elementary(lotti)\n\ntherefore Elementary(lotti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Corabella is unwelcome. Carmelia is sabbatical. Starlene is unsoiled. Green people are pretty. If someone is patent and unwelcome then they are sabbatical. If someone is pretty then they are sabbatical. Cold, sabbatical people are patent. All bottomless people are patent. All bottomless people are not unwelcome. All bottomless people are vital. Smart, pretty people are not vital. Corabella is pretty.", "logic": "\nUnwelcome(corabella)\nSabbatical(carmelia)\nUnsoiled(starlene)\nforall x (Unwelcome(x) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) and Unwelcome(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Sabbatical(x))\nforall x (Pretty(x) and Sabbatical(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) -> Patent(x))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) -> not Unwelcome(x))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) -> Vital(x))\nforall x (Bottomless(x) and Pretty(x) -> not Vital(x))\n\nPretty(corabella)\n\nUnwelcome(corabella) and forall x (Unwelcome(x) -> Pretty(x)) -> therefore Pretty(corabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Rhona is dioestrous. Adrienne is interlaced. Raymund is empowered. Green people are sinning. If someone is generous and dioestrous then they are interlaced. If someone is sinning then they are interlaced. Cold, interlaced people are generous. All araceous people are generous. All araceous people are not dioestrous. All araceous people are thrilled. Smart, sinning people are not thrilled. Rhona is not sinning.", "logic": "\nDioestrous(rhona)\nInterlaced(adrienne)\nEmpowered(raymund)\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Sinning(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) and Dioestrous(x) -> Interlaced(x))\nforall x (Sinning(x) -> Interlaced(x))\nforall x (Sinning(x) and Interlaced(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> not Dioestrous(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> Thrilled(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) and Sinning(x) -> not Thrilled(x))\n\nnot Sinning(rhona)\n\nDioestrous(rhona) and forall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Sinning(x)) -> therefore Sinning(rhona)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Shawnee is flagellate. Amberly is unequipped. Linette is skeptical. Green people are downhill. If someone is boney and flagellate then they are unequipped. If someone is downhill then they are unequipped. Cold, unequipped people are boney. All charming people are boney. All charming people are not flagellate. All charming people are bibless. Smart, downhill people are not bibless. Shawnee is unequipped.", "logic": "\nFlagellate(shawnee)\nUnequipped(amberly)\nSkeptical(linette)\nforall x (Flagellate(x) -> Downhill(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) and Flagellate(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Downhill(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Downhill(x) and Unequipped(x) -> Boney(x))\nforall x (Charming(x) -> Boney(x))\nforall x (Charming(x) -> not Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Charming(x) -> Bibless(x))\nforall x (Charming(x) and Downhill(x) -> not Bibless(x))\n\nUnequipped(shawnee)\n\nFlagellate(shawnee) and forall x (Flagellate(x) -> Downhill(x)) -> therefore Downhill(shawnee) Downhill(shawnee) and forall x (Downhill(x) -> Unequipped(x)) -> therefore Unequipped(shawnee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Latisha is curly. Fitz is reanimated. Dimitris is vivace. Green people are feline. If someone is verbal and curly then they are reanimated. If someone is feline then they are reanimated. Cold, reanimated people are verbal. All sulfuric people are verbal. All sulfuric people are not curly. All sulfuric people are reliant. Smart, feline people are not reliant. Latisha is not reanimated.", "logic": "\nCurly(latisha)\nReanimated(fitz)\nVivace(dimitris)\nforall x (Curly(x) -> Feline(x))\nforall x (Verbal(x) and Curly(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Feline(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Feline(x) and Reanimated(x) -> Verbal(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Verbal(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> not Curly(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) and Feline(x) -> not Reliant(x))\n\nnot Reanimated(latisha)\n\nCurly(latisha) and forall x (Curly(x) -> Feline(x)) -> therefore Feline(latisha) Feline(latisha) and forall x (Feline(x) -> Reanimated(x)) -> therefore Reanimated(latisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Leigh is fagged. Merrill is discordant. Lolita is briny. Green people are rarified. If someone is unalloyed and fagged then they are discordant. If someone is rarified then they are discordant. Cold, discordant people are unalloyed. All oscine people are unalloyed. All oscine people are not fagged. All oscine people are septal. Smart, rarified people are not septal. Leigh is unalloyed.", "logic": "\nFagged(leigh)\nDiscordant(merrill)\nBriny(lolita)\nforall x (Fagged(x) -> Rarified(x))\nforall x (Unalloyed(x) and Fagged(x) -> Discordant(x))\nforall x (Rarified(x) -> Discordant(x))\nforall x (Rarified(x) and Discordant(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> not Fagged(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) and Rarified(x) -> not Septal(x))\n\nUnalloyed(leigh)\n\nFagged(leigh) and forall x (Fagged(x) -> Rarified(x)) -> therefore Rarified(leigh) Fagged(leigh) and forall x (Fagged(x) -> Rarified(x)) -> therefore Rarified(leigh) Rarified(leigh) and forall x (Rarified(x) -> Discordant(x)) -> therefore Discordant(leigh) Rarified(leigh) and Discordant(leigh) and forall x (Rarified(x) and Discordant(x) -> Unalloyed(x)) -> therefore Unalloyed(leigh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Melosa is timeworn. Yoko is jurassic. Crissie is expansile. Green people are photic. If someone is anabolic and timeworn then they are jurassic. If someone is photic then they are jurassic. Cold, jurassic people are anabolic. All mesonic people are anabolic. All mesonic people are not timeworn. All mesonic people are startled. Smart, photic people are not startled. Melosa is not anabolic.", "logic": "\nTimeworn(melosa)\nJurassic(yoko)\nExpansile(crissie)\nforall x (Timeworn(x) -> Photic(x))\nforall x (Anabolic(x) and Timeworn(x) -> Jurassic(x))\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Jurassic(x))\nforall x (Photic(x) and Jurassic(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Mesonic(x) -> Anabolic(x))\nforall x (Mesonic(x) -> not Timeworn(x))\nforall x (Mesonic(x) -> Startled(x))\nforall x (Mesonic(x) and Photic(x) -> not Startled(x))\n\nnot Anabolic(melosa)\n\nTimeworn(melosa) and forall x (Timeworn(x) -> Photic(x)) -> therefore Photic(melosa) Timeworn(melosa) and forall x (Timeworn(x) -> Photic(x)) -> therefore Photic(melosa) Photic(melosa) and forall x (Photic(x) -> Jurassic(x)) -> therefore Jurassic(melosa) Photic(melosa) and Jurassic(melosa) and forall x (Photic(x) and Jurassic(x) -> Anabolic(x)) -> therefore Anabolic(melosa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Gilberte is shrimpy. Jennee is slick. Herby is lascivious. Green people are untucked. If someone is jangling and shrimpy then they are slick. If someone is untucked then they are slick. Cold, slick people are jangling. All unsorted people are jangling. All unsorted people are not shrimpy. All unsorted people are airheaded. Smart, untucked people are not airheaded. Jennee is not airheaded.", "logic": "\nShrimpy(gilberte)\nSlick(jennee)\nLascivious(herby)\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Untucked(x))\nforall x (Jangling(x) and Shrimpy(x) -> Slick(x))\nforall x (Untucked(x) -> Slick(x))\nforall x (Untucked(x) and Slick(x) -> Jangling(x))\nforall x (Unsorted(x) -> Jangling(x))\nforall x (Unsorted(x) -> not Shrimpy(x))\nforall x (Unsorted(x) -> Airheaded(x))\nforall x (Unsorted(x) and Untucked(x) -> not Airheaded(x))\n\nnot Airheaded(jennee)\n\nforall x (Unsorted(x) -> Airheaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Marlee is milch. Arvind is penile. Lazlo is marooned. Green people are subatomic. If someone is aegean and milch then they are penile. If someone is subatomic then they are penile. Cold, penile people are aegean. All filar people are aegean. All filar people are not milch. All filar people are ibsenian. Smart, subatomic people are not ibsenian. Arvind is aegean.", "logic": "\nMilch(marlee)\nPenile(arvind)\nMarooned(lazlo)\nforall x (Milch(x) -> Subatomic(x))\nforall x (Aegean(x) and Milch(x) -> Penile(x))\nforall x (Subatomic(x) -> Penile(x))\nforall x (Subatomic(x) and Penile(x) -> Aegean(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) -> Aegean(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) -> not Milch(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) and Subatomic(x) -> not Ibsenian(x))\n\nAegean(arvind)\n\nforall x (Subatomic(x) and Penile(x) -> Aegean(x)) <- forall x (Milch(x) -> Subatomic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Janifer is soured. Ailee is miserly. Noelani is saute. Green people are biracial. If someone is destined and soured then they are miserly. If someone is biracial then they are miserly. Cold, miserly people are destined. All stretchy people are destined. All stretchy people are not soured. All stretchy people are hygienic. Smart, biracial people are not hygienic. Noelani is not biracial.", "logic": "\nSoured(janifer)\nMiserly(ailee)\nSaute(noelani)\nforall x (Soured(x) -> Biracial(x))\nforall x (Destined(x) and Soured(x) -> Miserly(x))\nforall x (Biracial(x) -> Miserly(x))\nforall x (Biracial(x) and Miserly(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> not Soured(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Hygienic(x))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) and Biracial(x) -> not Hygienic(x))\n\nnot Biracial(noelani)\n\nforall x (Soured(x) -> Biracial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Lowell is expressive. Marcie is midmost. Sharla is howling. Green people are hostile. If someone is duplicable and expressive then they are midmost. If someone is hostile then they are midmost. Cold, midmost people are duplicable. All tuneless people are duplicable. All tuneless people are not expressive. All tuneless people are lessened. Smart, hostile people are not lessened. Marcie is hostile.", "logic": "\nExpressive(lowell)\nMidmost(marcie)\nHowling(sharla)\nforall x (Expressive(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Duplicable(x) and Expressive(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) and Midmost(x) -> Duplicable(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Duplicable(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> not Expressive(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Lessened(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) and Hostile(x) -> not Lessened(x))\n\nHostile(marcie)\n\nforall x (Expressive(x) -> Hostile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Haywood is diaphyseal. Karel is dizygous. Irena is carolean. Green people are starlit. If someone is ruandan and diaphyseal then they are dizygous. If someone is starlit then they are dizygous. Cold, dizygous people are ruandan. All blocked people are ruandan. All blocked people are not diaphyseal. All blocked people are sudden. Smart, starlit people are not sudden. Karel is not blocked.", "logic": "\nDiaphyseal(haywood)\nDizygous(karel)\nCarolean(irena)\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) -> Starlit(x))\nforall x (Ruandan(x) and Diaphyseal(x) -> Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Starlit(x) -> Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Starlit(x) and Dizygous(x) -> Ruandan(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Ruandan(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> not Diaphyseal(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Sudden(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) and Starlit(x) -> not Sudden(x))\n\nnot Blocked(karel)\n\nnot Blocked(karel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Taryn is consecrate. Fatima is unwritten. Dulce is gravelly. Green people are theistical. If someone is hearsay and consecrate then they are unwritten. If someone is theistical then they are unwritten. Cold, unwritten people are hearsay. All external people are hearsay. All external people are not consecrate. All external people are antimonial. Smart, theistical people are not antimonial. Fatima is consecrate.", "logic": "\nConsecrate(taryn)\nUnwritten(fatima)\nGravelly(dulce)\nforall x (Consecrate(x) -> Theistical(x))\nforall x (Hearsay(x) and Consecrate(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Theistical(x) -> Unwritten(x))\nforall x (Theistical(x) and Unwritten(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nforall x (External(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nforall x (External(x) -> not Consecrate(x))\nforall x (External(x) -> Antimonial(x))\nforall x (External(x) and Theistical(x) -> not Antimonial(x))\n\nConsecrate(fatima)\n\nConsecrate(fatima) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Larine is addicted. Hannah is untainted. Menard is overawed. Green people are boney. If someone is trivial and addicted then they are untainted. If someone is boney then they are untainted. Cold, untainted people are trivial. All tertiary people are trivial. All tertiary people are not addicted. All tertiary people are wondrous. Smart, boney people are not wondrous. Larine is not overawed.", "logic": "\nAddicted(larine)\nUntainted(hannah)\nOverawed(menard)\nforall x (Addicted(x) -> Boney(x))\nforall x (Trivial(x) and Addicted(x) -> Untainted(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) -> Untainted(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) and Untainted(x) -> Trivial(x))\nforall x (Tertiary(x) -> Trivial(x))\nforall x (Tertiary(x) -> not Addicted(x))\nforall x (Tertiary(x) -> Wondrous(x))\nforall x (Tertiary(x) and Boney(x) -> not Wondrous(x))\n\nnot Overawed(larine)\n\nnot Overawed(larine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Loralie is docile. Laural is reflexive. Tatum is bistered. Green people are haemic. If someone is westmost and docile then they are reflexive. If someone is haemic then they are reflexive. Cold, reflexive people are westmost. All antitumor people are westmost. All antitumor people are not docile. All antitumor people are avowed. Smart, haemic people are not avowed. Tatum is docile.", "logic": "\nDocile(loralie)\nReflexive(laural)\nBistered(tatum)\nforall x (Docile(x) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Westmost(x) and Docile(x) -> Reflexive(x))\nforall x (Haemic(x) -> Reflexive(x))\nforall x (Haemic(x) and Reflexive(x) -> Westmost(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) -> Westmost(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) -> not Docile(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) -> Avowed(x))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) and Haemic(x) -> not Avowed(x))\n\nDocile(tatum)\n\nDocile(tatum) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-208"} {"premises": "Audi is nonmetal. Shari is sprightly. Willetta is yellowish. Rough, fore things are hematic. All sprightly things are yellowish. White, sprightly things are fore. If something is episodic and semite then it is sprightly. If something is fore then it is nonmetal. All yellowish, sprightly things are fore. Audi is nonmetal.", "logic": "\nNonmetal(audi)\nSprightly(shari)\nYellowish(willetta)\nforall x (Nonmetal(x) and Fore(x) -> Hematic(x))\nforall x (Sprightly(x) -> Yellowish(x))\nforall x (Episodic(x) and Sprightly(x) -> Fore(x))\nforall x (Episodic(x) and Semite(x) -> Sprightly(x))\nforall x (Fore(x) -> Nonmetal(x))\nforall x (Yellowish(x) and Sprightly(x) -> Fore(x))\n\nNonmetal(audi)\n\ntherefore Nonmetal(audi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Chelton is hydrated. Lorrie is ulcerative. Nanice is clear. Rough, anechoic things are hueless. All ulcerative things are clear. White, ulcerative things are anechoic. If something is arctic and screwball then it is ulcerative. If something is anechoic then it is hydrated. All clear, ulcerative things are anechoic. Lorrie is not ulcerative.", "logic": "\nHydrated(chelton)\nUlcerative(lorrie)\nClear(nanice)\nforall x (Hydrated(x) and Anechoic(x) -> Hueless(x))\nforall x (Ulcerative(x) -> Clear(x))\nforall x (Arctic(x) and Ulcerative(x) -> Anechoic(x))\nforall x (Arctic(x) and Screwball(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Anechoic(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Clear(x) and Ulcerative(x) -> Anechoic(x))\n\nnot Ulcerative(lorrie)\n\ntherefore Ulcerative(lorrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Norma is bicapsular. Ephram is altered. Blayne is unmannerly. Rough, unsteady things are stalked. All altered things are unmannerly. White, altered things are unsteady. If something is accessory and unshod then it is altered. If something is unsteady then it is bicapsular. All unmannerly, altered things are unsteady. Ephram is unmannerly.", "logic": "\nBicapsular(norma)\nAltered(ephram)\nUnmannerly(blayne)\nforall x (Bicapsular(x) and Unsteady(x) -> Stalked(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Unmannerly(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Altered(x) -> Unsteady(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) and Unshod(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Unsteady(x) -> Bicapsular(x))\nforall x (Unmannerly(x) and Altered(x) -> Unsteady(x))\n\nUnmannerly(ephram)\n\nAltered(ephram) and forall x (Altered(x) -> Unmannerly(x)) -> therefore Unmannerly(ephram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Jefry is capetian. Rollo is efferent. Vivia is zaftig. Rough, notched things are neurologic. All efferent things are zaftig. White, efferent things are notched. If something is weedless and procurable then it is efferent. If something is notched then it is capetian. All zaftig, efferent things are notched. Rollo is not zaftig.", "logic": "\nCapetian(jefry)\nEfferent(rollo)\nZaftig(vivia)\nforall x (Capetian(x) and Notched(x) -> Neurologic(x))\nforall x (Efferent(x) -> Zaftig(x))\nforall x (Weedless(x) and Efferent(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Weedless(x) and Procurable(x) -> Efferent(x))\nforall x (Notched(x) -> Capetian(x))\nforall x (Zaftig(x) and Efferent(x) -> Notched(x))\n\nnot Zaftig(rollo)\n\nEfferent(rollo) and forall x (Efferent(x) -> Zaftig(x)) -> therefore Zaftig(rollo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Elysha is merciless. Clarette is malefic. Mattheus is grumose. Rough, yielding things are blowy. All malefic things are grumose. White, malefic things are yielding. If something is arcane and unratified then it is malefic. If something is yielding then it is merciless. All grumose, malefic things are yielding. Clarette is yielding.", "logic": "\nMerciless(elysha)\nMalefic(clarette)\nGrumose(mattheus)\nforall x (Merciless(x) and Yielding(x) -> Blowy(x))\nforall x (Malefic(x) -> Grumose(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Malefic(x) -> Yielding(x))\nforall x (Arcane(x) and Unratified(x) -> Malefic(x))\nforall x (Yielding(x) -> Merciless(x))\nforall x (Grumose(x) and Malefic(x) -> Yielding(x))\n\nYielding(clarette)\n\nMalefic(clarette) and forall x (Malefic(x) -> Grumose(x)) -> therefore Grumose(clarette) Grumose(clarette) and Malefic(clarette) and forall x (Grumose(x) and Malefic(x) -> Yielding(x)) -> therefore Yielding(clarette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Suzanne is earthen. Andonis is godless. Lezlie is allantoic. Rough, anaclinal things are lean. All godless things are allantoic. White, godless things are anaclinal. If something is lamblike and broadleaf then it is godless. If something is anaclinal then it is earthen. All allantoic, godless things are anaclinal. Andonis is not anaclinal.", "logic": "\nEarthen(suzanne)\nGodless(andonis)\nAllantoic(lezlie)\nforall x (Earthen(x) and Anaclinal(x) -> Lean(x))\nforall x (Godless(x) -> Allantoic(x))\nforall x (Lamblike(x) and Godless(x) -> Anaclinal(x))\nforall x (Lamblike(x) and Broadleaf(x) -> Godless(x))\nforall x (Anaclinal(x) -> Earthen(x))\nforall x (Allantoic(x) and Godless(x) -> Anaclinal(x))\n\nnot Anaclinal(andonis)\n\nGodless(andonis) and forall x (Godless(x) -> Allantoic(x)) -> therefore Allantoic(andonis) Allantoic(andonis) and Godless(andonis) and forall x (Allantoic(x) and Godless(x) -> Anaclinal(x)) -> therefore Anaclinal(andonis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Zippy is pustulate. Ceil is slavelike. Graehme is absent. Rough, overhead things are debased. All slavelike things are absent. White, slavelike things are overhead. If something is postmortal and trusty then it is slavelike. If something is overhead then it is pustulate. All absent, slavelike things are overhead. Ceil is pustulate.", "logic": "\nPustulate(zippy)\nSlavelike(ceil)\nAbsent(graehme)\nforall x (Pustulate(x) and Overhead(x) -> Debased(x))\nforall x (Slavelike(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Slavelike(x) -> Overhead(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Trusty(x) -> Slavelike(x))\nforall x (Overhead(x) -> Pustulate(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) and Slavelike(x) -> Overhead(x))\n\nPustulate(ceil)\n\nSlavelike(ceil) and forall x (Slavelike(x) -> Absent(x)) -> therefore Absent(ceil) Absent(ceil) and Slavelike(ceil) and forall x (Absent(x) and Slavelike(x) -> Overhead(x)) -> therefore Overhead(ceil) Overhead(ceil) and forall x (Overhead(x) -> Pustulate(x)) -> therefore Pustulate(ceil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Vail is thirtieth. Philomena is fibrillose. Vere is needed. Rough, candid things are cenozoic. All fibrillose things are needed. White, fibrillose things are candid. If something is hermetic and croupy then it is fibrillose. If something is candid then it is thirtieth. All needed, fibrillose things are candid. Philomena is not thirtieth.", "logic": "\nThirtieth(vail)\nFibrillose(philomena)\nNeeded(vere)\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Candid(x) -> Cenozoic(x))\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Needed(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) and Fibrillose(x) -> Candid(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) and Croupy(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\nforall x (Candid(x) -> Thirtieth(x))\nforall x (Needed(x) and Fibrillose(x) -> Candid(x))\n\nnot Thirtieth(philomena)\n\nFibrillose(philomena) and forall x (Fibrillose(x) -> Needed(x)) -> therefore Needed(philomena) Needed(philomena) and Fibrillose(philomena) and forall x (Needed(x) and Fibrillose(x) -> Candid(x)) -> therefore Candid(philomena) Candid(philomena) and forall x (Candid(x) -> Thirtieth(x)) -> therefore Thirtieth(philomena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Dyann is knitted. Marketa is touched. Honoria is endangered. Rough, yearlong things are semitropic. All touched things are endangered. White, touched things are yearlong. If something is danceable and manifold then it is touched. If something is yearlong then it is knitted. All endangered, touched things are yearlong. Honoria is not yearlong.", "logic": "\nKnitted(dyann)\nTouched(marketa)\nEndangered(honoria)\nforall x (Knitted(x) and Yearlong(x) -> Semitropic(x))\nforall x (Touched(x) -> Endangered(x))\nforall x (Danceable(x) and Touched(x) -> Yearlong(x))\nforall x (Danceable(x) and Manifold(x) -> Touched(x))\nforall x (Yearlong(x) -> Knitted(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) and Touched(x) -> Yearlong(x))\n\nnot Yearlong(honoria)\n\nforall x (Endangered(x) and Touched(x) -> Yearlong(x)) <- forall x (Danceable(x) and Manifold(x) -> Touched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Gretna is mucky. Ardith is unsymbolic. Trent is sanctified. Rough, striate things are paperlike. All unsymbolic things are sanctified. White, unsymbolic things are striate. If something is detersive and unshaped then it is unsymbolic. If something is striate then it is mucky. All sanctified, unsymbolic things are striate. Gretna is sanctified.", "logic": "\nMucky(gretna)\nUnsymbolic(ardith)\nSanctified(trent)\nforall x (Mucky(x) and Striate(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Sanctified(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Striate(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) and Unshaped(x) -> Unsymbolic(x))\nforall x (Striate(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Sanctified(x) and Unsymbolic(x) -> Striate(x))\n\nSanctified(gretna)\n\nforall x (Unsymbolic(x) -> Sanctified(x)) <- forall x (Detersive(x) and Unshaped(x) -> Unsymbolic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Fredrika is palpebrate. Goddart is midmost. Tandie is surmisable. Rough, hogged things are unhelpful. All midmost things are surmisable. White, midmost things are hogged. If something is exergonic and auroral then it is midmost. If something is hogged then it is palpebrate. All surmisable, midmost things are hogged. Tandie is not midmost.", "logic": "\nPalpebrate(fredrika)\nMidmost(goddart)\nSurmisable(tandie)\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and Hogged(x) -> Unhelpful(x))\nforall x (Midmost(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) and Midmost(x) -> Hogged(x))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) and Auroral(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Surmisable(x) and Midmost(x) -> Hogged(x))\n\nnot Midmost(tandie)\n\nforall x (Exergonic(x) and Auroral(x) -> Midmost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Perry is adoptable. Jinny is gratified. Clark is assistive. Rough, epistolary things are monoclinic. All gratified things are assistive. White, gratified things are epistolary. If something is waggish and soldierly then it is gratified. If something is epistolary then it is adoptable. All assistive, gratified things are epistolary. Perry is epistolary.", "logic": "\nAdoptable(perry)\nGratified(jinny)\nAssistive(clark)\nforall x (Adoptable(x) and Epistolary(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Gratified(x) -> Assistive(x))\nforall x (Waggish(x) and Gratified(x) -> Epistolary(x))\nforall x (Waggish(x) and Soldierly(x) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Epistolary(x) -> Adoptable(x))\nforall x (Assistive(x) and Gratified(x) -> Epistolary(x))\n\nEpistolary(perry)\n\nforall x (Assistive(x) and Gratified(x) -> Epistolary(x)) <- forall x (Waggish(x) and Soldierly(x) -> Gratified(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Celestine is pleasing. Julienne is chasidic. Janifer is shelfy. Rough, malarial things are euphonous. All chasidic things are shelfy. White, chasidic things are malarial. If something is nonresiny and despotic then it is chasidic. If something is malarial then it is pleasing. All shelfy, chasidic things are malarial. Celestine is not nonresiny.", "logic": "\nPleasing(celestine)\nChasidic(julienne)\nShelfy(janifer)\nforall x (Pleasing(x) and Malarial(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Chasidic(x) -> Shelfy(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Chasidic(x) -> Malarial(x))\nforall x (Nonresiny(x) and Despotic(x) -> Chasidic(x))\nforall x (Malarial(x) -> Pleasing(x))\nforall x (Shelfy(x) and Chasidic(x) -> Malarial(x))\n\nnot Nonresiny(celestine)\n\nnot Nonresiny(celestine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Ransom is littoral. Marlin is diastolic. Hailee is initiatory. Rough, unhinged things are marauding. All diastolic things are initiatory. White, diastolic things are unhinged. If something is piecemeal and chaetal then it is diastolic. If something is unhinged then it is littoral. All initiatory, diastolic things are unhinged. Hailee is chaetal.", "logic": "\nLittoral(ransom)\nDiastolic(marlin)\nInitiatory(hailee)\nforall x (Littoral(x) and Unhinged(x) -> Marauding(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) -> Initiatory(x))\nforall x (Piecemeal(x) and Diastolic(x) -> Unhinged(x))\nforall x (Piecemeal(x) and Chaetal(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Unhinged(x) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Initiatory(x) and Diastolic(x) -> Unhinged(x))\n\nChaetal(hailee)\n\nChaetal(hailee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Darlene is ocher. Dean is snotty. Cosmo is brinded. Rough, inclusive things are damn. All snotty things are brinded. White, snotty things are inclusive. If something is protracted and enabling then it is snotty. If something is inclusive then it is ocher. All brinded, snotty things are inclusive. Cosmo is not protracted.", "logic": "\nOcher(darlene)\nSnotty(dean)\nBrinded(cosmo)\nforall x (Ocher(x) and Inclusive(x) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Snotty(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Protracted(x) and Snotty(x) -> Inclusive(x))\nforall x (Protracted(x) and Enabling(x) -> Snotty(x))\nforall x (Inclusive(x) -> Ocher(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) and Snotty(x) -> Inclusive(x))\n\nnot Protracted(cosmo)\n\nnot Protracted(cosmo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Pauli is abulic. Betti is legitimate. Yanaton is migratory. Rough, porose things are purposeful. All legitimate things are migratory. White, legitimate things are porose. If something is protozoic and smaller then it is legitimate. If something is porose then it is abulic. All migratory, legitimate things are porose. Betti is smaller.", "logic": "\nAbulic(pauli)\nLegitimate(betti)\nMigratory(yanaton)\nforall x (Abulic(x) and Porose(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Legitimate(x) -> Migratory(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and Legitimate(x) -> Porose(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and Smaller(x) -> Legitimate(x))\nforall x (Porose(x) -> Abulic(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Legitimate(x) -> Porose(x))\n\nSmaller(betti)\n\nSmaller(betti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-72"} {"premises": "Quintina is discalced. Mehetabel is aphetic. Mehetabel is unmourned. If someone is foursquare and branched then they are wheezing. All depressant people are wheezing. If someone is wheezing and aphetic then they are foursquare. White people are foursquare. White people are depressant. If someone is unmourned and not branched then they are aphetic. If someone is wheezing then they are not discalced. If someone is wheezing and not aphetic then they are discalced. Mehetabel is aphetic.", "logic": "\nDiscalced(quintina)\nAphetic(mehetabel)\nUnmourned(mehetabel)\nforall x (Foursquare(x) and Branched(x) -> Wheezing(x))\nforall x (Depressant(x) -> Wheezing(x))\nforall x (Wheezing(x) and Aphetic(x) -> Foursquare(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) -> Foursquare(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) -> Depressant(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) and not Branched(x) -> Aphetic(x))\nforall x (Wheezing(x) -> not Discalced(x))\nforall x (Wheezing(x) and not Aphetic(x) -> Discalced(x))\n\nAphetic(mehetabel)\n\ntherefore Aphetic(mehetabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Lorelei is slight. Lawson is taxpaying. Lawson is cxxx. If someone is eurafrican and insatiate then they are asteroidal. All binate people are asteroidal. If someone is asteroidal and taxpaying then they are eurafrican. White people are eurafrican. White people are binate. If someone is cxxx and not insatiate then they are taxpaying. If someone is asteroidal then they are not slight. If someone is asteroidal and not taxpaying then they are slight. Lawson is not taxpaying.", "logic": "\nSlight(lorelei)\nTaxpaying(lawson)\nCxxx(lawson)\nforall x (Eurafrican(x) and Insatiate(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Binate(x) -> Asteroidal(x))\nforall x (Asteroidal(x) and Taxpaying(x) -> Eurafrican(x))\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Eurafrican(x))\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Binate(x))\nforall x (Cxxx(x) and not Insatiate(x) -> Taxpaying(x))\nforall x (Asteroidal(x) -> not Slight(x))\nforall x (Asteroidal(x) and not Taxpaying(x) -> Slight(x))\n\nnot Taxpaying(lawson)\n\ntherefore Taxpaying(lawson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Orbadiah is shona. Gearard is effaceable. Gearard is westward. If someone is hypnoid and modular then they are dainty. All sigmoid people are dainty. If someone is dainty and effaceable then they are hypnoid. White people are hypnoid. White people are sigmoid. If someone is westward and not modular then they are effaceable. If someone is dainty then they are not shona. If someone is dainty and not effaceable then they are shona. Gearard is sigmoid.", "logic": "\nShona(orbadiah)\nEffaceable(gearard)\nWestward(gearard)\nforall x (Hypnoid(x) and Modular(x) -> Dainty(x))\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) -> Dainty(x))\nforall x (Dainty(x) and Effaceable(x) -> Hypnoid(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) -> Hypnoid(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) and not Modular(x) -> Effaceable(x))\nforall x (Dainty(x) -> not Shona(x))\nforall x (Dainty(x) and not Effaceable(x) -> Shona(x))\n\nSigmoid(gearard)\n\nWestward(gearard) and forall x (Westward(x) -> Sigmoid(x)) -> therefore Sigmoid(gearard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Adel is dehydrated. Wilhelm is besotted. Wilhelm is revered. If someone is explosive and bullate then they are pentatonic. All dosed people are pentatonic. If someone is pentatonic and besotted then they are explosive. White people are explosive. White people are dosed. If someone is revered and not bullate then they are besotted. If someone is pentatonic then they are not dehydrated. If someone is pentatonic and not besotted then they are dehydrated. Wilhelm is not explosive.", "logic": "\nDehydrated(adel)\nBesotted(wilhelm)\nRevered(wilhelm)\nforall x (Explosive(x) and Bullate(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Dosed(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) and Besotted(x) -> Explosive(x))\nforall x (Revered(x) -> Explosive(x))\nforall x (Revered(x) -> Dosed(x))\nforall x (Revered(x) and not Bullate(x) -> Besotted(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> not Dehydrated(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) and not Besotted(x) -> Dehydrated(x))\n\nnot Explosive(wilhelm)\n\nRevered(wilhelm) and forall x (Revered(x) -> Explosive(x)) -> therefore Explosive(wilhelm)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Florella is bitchy. Joly is beardless. Joly is smelly. If someone is pawky and stannic then they are bandaged. All fistular people are bandaged. If someone is bandaged and beardless then they are pawky. White people are pawky. White people are fistular. If someone is smelly and not stannic then they are beardless. If someone is bandaged then they are not bitchy. If someone is bandaged and not beardless then they are bitchy. Joly is bandaged.", "logic": "\nBitchy(florella)\nBeardless(joly)\nSmelly(joly)\nforall x (Pawky(x) and Stannic(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Bandaged(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) and Beardless(x) -> Pawky(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Pawky(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Fistular(x))\nforall x (Smelly(x) and not Stannic(x) -> Beardless(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) -> not Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Bandaged(x) and not Beardless(x) -> Bitchy(x))\n\nBandaged(joly)\n\nSmelly(joly) and forall x (Smelly(x) -> Fistular(x)) -> therefore Fistular(joly) Fistular(joly) and forall x (Fistular(x) -> Bandaged(x)) -> therefore Bandaged(joly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Thia is defeasible. Tobin is picky. Tobin is bacterioid. If someone is galling and distressed then they are detestable. All cosmogonic people are detestable. If someone is detestable and picky then they are galling. White people are galling. White people are cosmogonic. If someone is bacterioid and not distressed then they are picky. If someone is detestable then they are not defeasible. If someone is detestable and not picky then they are defeasible. Tobin is not detestable.", "logic": "\nDefeasible(thia)\nPicky(tobin)\nBacterioid(tobin)\nforall x (Galling(x) and Distressed(x) -> Detestable(x))\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Detestable(x))\nforall x (Detestable(x) and Picky(x) -> Galling(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Galling(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Cosmogonic(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) and not Distressed(x) -> Picky(x))\nforall x (Detestable(x) -> not Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Detestable(x) and not Picky(x) -> Defeasible(x))\n\nnot Detestable(tobin)\n\nBacterioid(tobin) and forall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Cosmogonic(x)) -> therefore Cosmogonic(tobin) Cosmogonic(tobin) and forall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Detestable(x)) -> therefore Detestable(tobin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Erica is unlovable. Mason is sunrise. Mason is japanese. If someone is arboreous and monogenic then they are unable. All homostylic people are unable. If someone is unable and sunrise then they are arboreous. White people are arboreous. White people are homostylic. If someone is japanese and not monogenic then they are sunrise. If someone is unable then they are not unlovable. If someone is unable and not sunrise then they are unlovable. Mason is not unlovable.", "logic": "\nUnlovable(erica)\nSunrise(mason)\nJapanese(mason)\nforall x (Arboreous(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Unable(x) and Sunrise(x) -> Arboreous(x))\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> Arboreous(x))\nforall x (Japanese(x) -> Homostylic(x))\nforall x (Japanese(x) and not Monogenic(x) -> Sunrise(x))\nforall x (Unable(x) -> not Unlovable(x))\nforall x (Unable(x) and not Sunrise(x) -> Unlovable(x))\n\nnot Unlovable(mason)\n\nJapanese(mason) and forall x (Japanese(x) -> Homostylic(x)) -> therefore Homostylic(mason) Homostylic(mason) and forall x (Homostylic(x) -> Unable(x)) -> therefore Unable(mason) Unable(mason) and forall x (Unable(x) -> not Unlovable(x)) -> therefore not Unlovable(mason)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Biff is headlong. Irena is virginal. Irena is anaphasic. If someone is barren and waking then they are roaring. All sticky people are roaring. If someone is roaring and virginal then they are barren. White people are barren. White people are sticky. If someone is anaphasic and not waking then they are virginal. If someone is roaring then they are not headlong. If someone is roaring and not virginal then they are headlong. Irena is headlong.", "logic": "\nHeadlong(biff)\nVirginal(irena)\nAnaphasic(irena)\nforall x (Barren(x) and Waking(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> Roaring(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) and Virginal(x) -> Barren(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) -> Barren(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) -> Sticky(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and not Waking(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) -> not Headlong(x))\nforall x (Roaring(x) and not Virginal(x) -> Headlong(x))\n\nHeadlong(irena)\n\nAnaphasic(irena) and forall x (Anaphasic(x) -> Sticky(x)) -> therefore Sticky(irena) Sticky(irena) and forall x (Sticky(x) -> Roaring(x)) -> therefore Roaring(irena) Roaring(irena) and forall x (Roaring(x) -> not Headlong(x)) -> therefore not Headlong(irena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Maude is plump. Merola is corrective. Merola is loamy. If someone is truncate and negroid then they are mealy. All aplanatic people are mealy. If someone is mealy and corrective then they are truncate. White people are truncate. White people are aplanatic. If someone is loamy and not negroid then they are corrective. If someone is mealy then they are not plump. If someone is mealy and not corrective then they are plump. Maude is not aplanatic.", "logic": "\nPlump(maude)\nCorrective(merola)\nLoamy(merola)\nforall x (Truncate(x) and Negroid(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Aplanatic(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) and Corrective(x) -> Truncate(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Truncate(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Aplanatic(x))\nforall x (Loamy(x) and not Negroid(x) -> Corrective(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> not Plump(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) and not Corrective(x) -> Plump(x))\n\nnot Aplanatic(maude)\n\nforall x (Loamy(x) -> Aplanatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Sax is volumed. Brunhilda is gluttonous. Brunhilda is uncertain. If someone is shivering and awheel then they are pectinate. All blooded people are pectinate. If someone is pectinate and gluttonous then they are shivering. White people are shivering. White people are blooded. If someone is uncertain and not awheel then they are gluttonous. If someone is pectinate then they are not volumed. If someone is pectinate and not gluttonous then they are volumed. Sax is gluttonous.", "logic": "\nVolumed(sax)\nGluttonous(brunhilda)\nUncertain(brunhilda)\nforall x (Shivering(x) and Awheel(x) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Blooded(x) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) and Gluttonous(x) -> Shivering(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Shivering(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) -> Blooded(x))\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and not Awheel(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) -> not Volumed(x))\nforall x (Pectinate(x) and not Gluttonous(x) -> Volumed(x))\n\nGluttonous(sax)\n\nforall x (Uncertain(x) and not Awheel(x) -> Gluttonous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Ericka is disquieted. Niels is bare. Niels is allantoid. If someone is beetle and engrossing then they are convex. All isotopic people are convex. If someone is convex and bare then they are beetle. White people are beetle. White people are isotopic. If someone is allantoid and not engrossing then they are bare. If someone is convex then they are not disquieted. If someone is convex and not bare then they are disquieted. Ericka is not convex.", "logic": "\nDisquieted(ericka)\nBare(niels)\nAllantoid(niels)\nforall x (Beetle(x) and Engrossing(x) -> Convex(x))\nforall x (Isotopic(x) -> Convex(x))\nforall x (Convex(x) and Bare(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) -> Isotopic(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) and not Engrossing(x) -> Bare(x))\nforall x (Convex(x) -> not Disquieted(x))\nforall x (Convex(x) and not Bare(x) -> Disquieted(x))\n\nnot Convex(ericka)\n\nforall x (Isotopic(x) -> Convex(x)) <- forall x (Allantoid(x) -> Isotopic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Gaston is ritardando. Tristan is wispy. Tristan is killable. If someone is splanchnic and picaresque then they are rotational. All stainless people are rotational. If someone is rotational and wispy then they are splanchnic. White people are splanchnic. White people are stainless. If someone is killable and not picaresque then they are wispy. If someone is rotational then they are not ritardando. If someone is rotational and not wispy then they are ritardando. Gaston is splanchnic.", "logic": "\nRitardando(gaston)\nWispy(tristan)\nKillable(tristan)\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and Picaresque(x) -> Rotational(x))\nforall x (Stainless(x) -> Rotational(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) and Wispy(x) -> Splanchnic(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) -> Splanchnic(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) -> Stainless(x))\nforall x (Killable(x) and not Picaresque(x) -> Wispy(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) -> not Ritardando(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) and not Wispy(x) -> Ritardando(x))\n\nSplanchnic(gaston)\n\nforall x (Rotational(x) and Wispy(x) -> Splanchnic(x)) <- forall x (Killable(x) and not Picaresque(x) -> Wispy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Konrad is bookable. Steffi is lingual. Steffi is bracteate. If someone is marmoreal and aqueous then they are gooey. All starting people are gooey. If someone is gooey and lingual then they are marmoreal. White people are marmoreal. White people are starting. If someone is bracteate and not aqueous then they are lingual. If someone is gooey then they are not bookable. If someone is gooey and not lingual then they are bookable. Konrad is not aqueous.", "logic": "\nBookable(konrad)\nLingual(steffi)\nBracteate(steffi)\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) and Aqueous(x) -> Gooey(x))\nforall x (Starting(x) -> Gooey(x))\nforall x (Gooey(x) and Lingual(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Bracteate(x) -> Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Bracteate(x) -> Starting(x))\nforall x (Bracteate(x) and not Aqueous(x) -> Lingual(x))\nforall x (Gooey(x) -> not Bookable(x))\nforall x (Gooey(x) and not Lingual(x) -> Bookable(x))\n\nnot Aqueous(konrad)\n\nnot Aqueous(konrad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "Gina is petrifying. Corey is bicyclic. Corey is unparallel. If someone is rueful and fissile then they are monthly. All transient people are monthly. If someone is monthly and bicyclic then they are rueful. White people are rueful. White people are transient. If someone is unparallel and not fissile then they are bicyclic. If someone is monthly then they are not petrifying. If someone is monthly and not bicyclic then they are petrifying. Corey is fissile.", "logic": "\nPetrifying(gina)\nBicyclic(corey)\nUnparallel(corey)\nforall x (Rueful(x) and Fissile(x) -> Monthly(x))\nforall x (Transient(x) -> Monthly(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) and Bicyclic(x) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Rueful(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Transient(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) and not Fissile(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) -> not Petrifying(x))\nforall x (Monthly(x) and not Bicyclic(x) -> Petrifying(x))\n\nFissile(corey)\n\nFissile(corey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1016"} {"premises": "The tiffy is not depraved. The tiffy is vestigial. The tiffy is bias. The tiffy is not clashing. The tiffy is federal. The tiffy trench the frances. The tiffy overstate the frances. The tiffy benight the frances. The frances is depraved. The frances is vestigial. The frances is bias. The frances is clashing. The frances trench the tiffy. The frances does not need the tiffy. The frances benight the tiffy. If someone overstate the frances and the frances overstate the tiffy then the tiffy does not visit the frances. If someone trench the tiffy and they visit the frances then they need the frances. If someone benight the tiffy then they visit the frances. If someone is bias and they need the frances then they like the frances. If the frances is clashing then the frances trench the tiffy. If someone trench the tiffy and they do not need the frances then the tiffy does not like the frances. If the tiffy does not like the frances and the tiffy does not need the frances then the frances is depraved. If someone is depraved and they do not like the tiffy then they are not vestigial. The tiffy is not clashing.", "logic": "\nnot Depraved(tiffy)\nVestigial(tiffy)\nBias(tiffy)\nnot Clashing(tiffy)\nFederal(tiffy)\nTrench(tiffy, frances)\nOverstate(tiffy, frances)\nBenight(tiffy, frances)\nDepraved(frances)\nVestigial(frances)\nBias(frances)\nClashing(frances)\nTrench(frances, tiffy)\nnot Overstate(frances, tiffy)\nBenight(frances, tiffy)\nforall x (Overstate(x, frances) and Overstate(frances, tiffy) -> not Benight(tiffy, frances))\nforall x (Trench(x, tiffy) and Benight(x, frances) -> Overstate(x, frances))\nforall x (Benight(x, tiffy) -> Benight(x, frances))\nforall x (Bias(x) and Overstate(x, frances) -> Trench(x, frances))\nClashing(frances) -> Trench(frances, tiffy)\nforall x (Trench(x, tiffy) and not Overstate(x, frances) -> not Trench(tiffy, frances))\nnot Trench(tiffy, frances) and not Overstate(tiffy, frances) -> Depraved(frances)\nforall x (Depraved(x) and not Trench(x, tiffy) -> not Vestigial(x))\n\nnot Clashing(tiffy)\n\ntherefore not Clashing(tiffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The sada is not cuspidal. The sada is inviolable. The sada is forbidding. The sada is not methodical. The sada is feverous. The sada concuss the paulie. The sada forearm the paulie. The sada parody the paulie. The paulie is cuspidal. The paulie is inviolable. The paulie is forbidding. The paulie is methodical. The paulie concuss the sada. The paulie does not need the sada. The paulie parody the sada. If someone forearm the paulie and the paulie forearm the sada then the sada does not visit the paulie. If someone concuss the sada and they visit the paulie then they need the paulie. If someone parody the sada then they visit the paulie. If someone is forbidding and they need the paulie then they like the paulie. If the paulie is methodical then the paulie concuss the sada. If someone concuss the sada and they do not need the paulie then the sada does not like the paulie. If the sada does not like the paulie and the sada does not need the paulie then the paulie is cuspidal. If someone is cuspidal and they do not like the sada then they are not inviolable. The sada does not need the paulie.", "logic": "\nnot Cuspidal(sada)\nInviolable(sada)\nForbidding(sada)\nnot Methodical(sada)\nFeverous(sada)\nConcuss(sada, paulie)\nForearm(sada, paulie)\nParody(sada, paulie)\nCuspidal(paulie)\nInviolable(paulie)\nForbidding(paulie)\nMethodical(paulie)\nConcuss(paulie, sada)\nnot Forearm(paulie, sada)\nParody(paulie, sada)\nforall x (Forearm(x, paulie) and Forearm(paulie, sada) -> not Parody(sada, paulie))\nforall x (Concuss(x, sada) and Parody(x, paulie) -> Forearm(x, paulie))\nforall x (Parody(x, sada) -> Parody(x, paulie))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) and Forearm(x, paulie) -> Concuss(x, paulie))\nMethodical(paulie) -> Concuss(paulie, sada)\nforall x (Concuss(x, sada) and not Forearm(x, paulie) -> not Concuss(sada, paulie))\nnot Concuss(sada, paulie) and not Forearm(sada, paulie) -> Cuspidal(paulie)\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and not Concuss(x, sada) -> not Inviolable(x))\n\nnot Forearm(sada, paulie)\n\ntherefore Forearm(sada, paulie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The debra is not inexorable. The debra is supreme. The debra is boggy. The debra is not julian. The debra is appressed. The debra impregnate the colene. The debra douche the colene. The debra shmooze the colene. The colene is inexorable. The colene is supreme. The colene is boggy. The colene is julian. The colene impregnate the debra. The colene does not need the debra. The colene shmooze the debra. If someone douche the colene and the colene douche the debra then the debra does not visit the colene. If someone impregnate the debra and they visit the colene then they need the colene. If someone shmooze the debra then they visit the colene. If someone is boggy and they need the colene then they like the colene. If the colene is julian then the colene impregnate the debra. If someone impregnate the debra and they do not need the colene then the debra does not like the colene. If the debra does not like the colene and the debra does not need the colene then the colene is inexorable. If someone is inexorable and they do not like the debra then they are not supreme. The colene shmooze the colene.", "logic": "\nnot Inexorable(debra)\nSupreme(debra)\nBoggy(debra)\nnot Julian(debra)\nAppressed(debra)\nImpregnate(debra, colene)\nDouche(debra, colene)\nShmooze(debra, colene)\nInexorable(colene)\nSupreme(colene)\nBoggy(colene)\nJulian(colene)\nImpregnate(colene, debra)\nnot Douche(colene, debra)\nShmooze(colene, debra)\nforall x (Douche(x, colene) and Douche(colene, debra) -> not Shmooze(debra, colene))\nforall x (Impregnate(x, debra) and Shmooze(x, colene) -> Douche(x, colene))\nforall x (Shmooze(x, debra) -> Shmooze(x, colene))\nforall x (Boggy(x) and Douche(x, colene) -> Impregnate(x, colene))\nJulian(colene) -> Impregnate(colene, debra)\nforall x (Impregnate(x, debra) and not Douche(x, colene) -> not Impregnate(debra, colene))\nnot Impregnate(debra, colene) and not Douche(debra, colene) -> Inexorable(colene)\nforall x (Inexorable(x) and not Impregnate(x, debra) -> not Supreme(x))\n\nShmooze(colene, colene)\n\nShmooze(colene, debra) and forall x (Shmooze(x, debra) -> Shmooze(x, colene)) -> therefore Shmooze(colene, colene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The felisha is not satanic. The felisha is huffy. The felisha is designed. The felisha is not pelagic. The felisha is quavering. The felisha reef the derron. The felisha citify the derron. The felisha worry the derron. The derron is satanic. The derron is huffy. The derron is designed. The derron is pelagic. The derron reef the felisha. The derron does not need the felisha. The derron worry the felisha. If someone citify the derron and the derron citify the felisha then the felisha does not visit the derron. If someone reef the felisha and they visit the derron then they need the derron. If someone worry the felisha then they visit the derron. If someone is designed and they need the derron then they like the derron. If the derron is pelagic then the derron reef the felisha. If someone reef the felisha and they do not need the derron then the felisha does not like the derron. If the felisha does not like the derron and the felisha does not need the derron then the derron is satanic. If someone is satanic and they do not like the felisha then they are not huffy. The derron does not visit the derron.", "logic": "\nnot Satanic(felisha)\nHuffy(felisha)\nDesigned(felisha)\nnot Pelagic(felisha)\nQuavering(felisha)\nReef(felisha, derron)\nCitify(felisha, derron)\nWorry(felisha, derron)\nSatanic(derron)\nHuffy(derron)\nDesigned(derron)\nPelagic(derron)\nReef(derron, felisha)\nnot Citify(derron, felisha)\nWorry(derron, felisha)\nforall x (Citify(x, derron) and Citify(derron, felisha) -> not Worry(felisha, derron))\nforall x (Reef(x, felisha) and Worry(x, derron) -> Citify(x, derron))\nforall x (Worry(x, felisha) -> Worry(x, derron))\nforall x (Designed(x) and Citify(x, derron) -> Reef(x, derron))\nPelagic(derron) -> Reef(derron, felisha)\nforall x (Reef(x, felisha) and not Citify(x, derron) -> not Reef(felisha, derron))\nnot Reef(felisha, derron) and not Citify(felisha, derron) -> Satanic(derron)\nforall x (Satanic(x) and not Reef(x, felisha) -> not Huffy(x))\n\nnot Worry(derron, derron)\n\nWorry(derron, felisha) and forall x (Worry(x, felisha) -> Worry(x, derron)) -> therefore Worry(derron, derron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The dorette is not tensed. The dorette is hastate. The dorette is corrosive. The dorette is not sexed. The dorette is pitched. The dorette forefend the gunvor. The dorette coeducate the gunvor. The dorette decamp the gunvor. The gunvor is tensed. The gunvor is hastate. The gunvor is corrosive. The gunvor is sexed. The gunvor forefend the dorette. The gunvor does not need the dorette. The gunvor decamp the dorette. If someone coeducate the gunvor and the gunvor coeducate the dorette then the dorette does not visit the gunvor. If someone forefend the dorette and they visit the gunvor then they need the gunvor. If someone decamp the dorette then they visit the gunvor. If someone is corrosive and they need the gunvor then they like the gunvor. If the gunvor is sexed then the gunvor forefend the dorette. If someone forefend the dorette and they do not need the gunvor then the dorette does not like the gunvor. If the dorette does not like the gunvor and the dorette does not need the gunvor then the gunvor is tensed. If someone is tensed and they do not like the dorette then they are not hastate. The gunvor coeducate the gunvor.", "logic": "\nnot Tensed(dorette)\nHastate(dorette)\nCorrosive(dorette)\nnot Sexed(dorette)\nPitched(dorette)\nForefend(dorette, gunvor)\nCoeducate(dorette, gunvor)\nDecamp(dorette, gunvor)\nTensed(gunvor)\nHastate(gunvor)\nCorrosive(gunvor)\nSexed(gunvor)\nForefend(gunvor, dorette)\nnot Coeducate(gunvor, dorette)\nDecamp(gunvor, dorette)\nforall x (Coeducate(x, gunvor) and Coeducate(gunvor, dorette) -> not Decamp(dorette, gunvor))\nforall x (Forefend(x, dorette) and Decamp(x, gunvor) -> Coeducate(x, gunvor))\nforall x (Decamp(x, dorette) -> Decamp(x, gunvor))\nforall x (Corrosive(x) and Coeducate(x, gunvor) -> Forefend(x, gunvor))\nSexed(gunvor) -> Forefend(gunvor, dorette)\nforall x (Forefend(x, dorette) and not Coeducate(x, gunvor) -> not Forefend(dorette, gunvor))\nnot Forefend(dorette, gunvor) and not Coeducate(dorette, gunvor) -> Tensed(gunvor)\nforall x (Tensed(x) and not Forefend(x, dorette) -> not Hastate(x))\n\nCoeducate(gunvor, gunvor)\n\nDecamp(gunvor, dorette) and forall x (Decamp(x, dorette) -> Decamp(x, gunvor)) -> therefore Decamp(gunvor, gunvor) Forefend(gunvor, dorette) and Decamp(gunvor, gunvor) and forall x (Forefend(x, dorette) and Decamp(x, gunvor) -> Coeducate(x, gunvor)) -> therefore Coeducate(gunvor, gunvor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The lora is not homocercal. The lora is unmanned. The lora is yellowed. The lora is not perfervid. The lora is burry. The lora grapple the cabrina. The lora sync the cabrina. The lora mistake the cabrina. The cabrina is homocercal. The cabrina is unmanned. The cabrina is yellowed. The cabrina is perfervid. The cabrina grapple the lora. The cabrina does not need the lora. The cabrina mistake the lora. If someone sync the cabrina and the cabrina sync the lora then the lora does not visit the cabrina. If someone grapple the lora and they visit the cabrina then they need the cabrina. If someone mistake the lora then they visit the cabrina. If someone is yellowed and they need the cabrina then they like the cabrina. If the cabrina is perfervid then the cabrina grapple the lora. If someone grapple the lora and they do not need the cabrina then the lora does not like the cabrina. If the lora does not like the cabrina and the lora does not need the cabrina then the cabrina is homocercal. If someone is homocercal and they do not like the lora then they are not unmanned. The cabrina does not need the cabrina.", "logic": "\nnot Homocercal(lora)\nUnmanned(lora)\nYellowed(lora)\nnot Perfervid(lora)\nBurry(lora)\nGrapple(lora, cabrina)\nSync(lora, cabrina)\nMistake(lora, cabrina)\nHomocercal(cabrina)\nUnmanned(cabrina)\nYellowed(cabrina)\nPerfervid(cabrina)\nGrapple(cabrina, lora)\nnot Sync(cabrina, lora)\nMistake(cabrina, lora)\nforall x (Sync(x, cabrina) and Sync(cabrina, lora) -> not Mistake(lora, cabrina))\nforall x (Grapple(x, lora) and Mistake(x, cabrina) -> Sync(x, cabrina))\nforall x (Mistake(x, lora) -> Mistake(x, cabrina))\nforall x (Yellowed(x) and Sync(x, cabrina) -> Grapple(x, cabrina))\nPerfervid(cabrina) -> Grapple(cabrina, lora)\nforall x (Grapple(x, lora) and not Sync(x, cabrina) -> not Grapple(lora, cabrina))\nnot Grapple(lora, cabrina) and not Sync(lora, cabrina) -> Homocercal(cabrina)\nforall x (Homocercal(x) and not Grapple(x, lora) -> not Unmanned(x))\n\nnot Sync(cabrina, cabrina)\n\nMistake(cabrina, lora) and forall x (Mistake(x, lora) -> Mistake(x, cabrina)) -> therefore Mistake(cabrina, cabrina) Grapple(cabrina, lora) and Mistake(cabrina, cabrina) and forall x (Grapple(x, lora) and Mistake(x, cabrina) -> Sync(x, cabrina)) -> therefore Sync(cabrina, cabrina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The kynthia is not unplanned. The kynthia is bated. The kynthia is pentatonic. The kynthia is not sable. The kynthia is unbeknown. The kynthia court the thomasine. The kynthia flurry the thomasine. The kynthia bemoan the thomasine. The thomasine is unplanned. The thomasine is bated. The thomasine is pentatonic. The thomasine is sable. The thomasine court the kynthia. The thomasine does not need the kynthia. The thomasine bemoan the kynthia. If someone flurry the thomasine and the thomasine flurry the kynthia then the kynthia does not visit the thomasine. If someone court the kynthia and they visit the thomasine then they need the thomasine. If someone bemoan the kynthia then they visit the thomasine. If someone is pentatonic and they need the thomasine then they like the thomasine. If the thomasine is sable then the thomasine court the kynthia. If someone court the kynthia and they do not need the thomasine then the kynthia does not like the thomasine. If the kynthia does not like the thomasine and the kynthia does not need the thomasine then the thomasine is unplanned. If someone is unplanned and they do not like the kynthia then they are not bated. The thomasine court the thomasine.", "logic": "\nnot Unplanned(kynthia)\nBated(kynthia)\nPentatonic(kynthia)\nnot Sable(kynthia)\nUnbeknown(kynthia)\nCourt(kynthia, thomasine)\nFlurry(kynthia, thomasine)\nBemoan(kynthia, thomasine)\nUnplanned(thomasine)\nBated(thomasine)\nPentatonic(thomasine)\nSable(thomasine)\nCourt(thomasine, kynthia)\nnot Flurry(thomasine, kynthia)\nBemoan(thomasine, kynthia)\nforall x (Flurry(x, thomasine) and Flurry(thomasine, kynthia) -> not Bemoan(kynthia, thomasine))\nforall x (Court(x, kynthia) and Bemoan(x, thomasine) -> Flurry(x, thomasine))\nforall x (Bemoan(x, kynthia) -> Bemoan(x, thomasine))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) and Flurry(x, thomasine) -> Court(x, thomasine))\nSable(thomasine) -> Court(thomasine, kynthia)\nforall x (Court(x, kynthia) and not Flurry(x, thomasine) -> not Court(kynthia, thomasine))\nnot Court(kynthia, thomasine) and not Flurry(kynthia, thomasine) -> Unplanned(thomasine)\nforall x (Unplanned(x) and not Court(x, kynthia) -> not Bated(x))\n\nCourt(thomasine, thomasine)\n\nBemoan(thomasine, kynthia) and forall x (Bemoan(x, kynthia) -> Bemoan(x, thomasine)) -> therefore Bemoan(thomasine, thomasine) Court(thomasine, kynthia) and Bemoan(thomasine, thomasine) and forall x (Court(x, kynthia) and Bemoan(x, thomasine) -> Flurry(x, thomasine)) -> therefore Flurry(thomasine, thomasine) Pentatonic(thomasine) and Flurry(thomasine, thomasine) and forall x (Pentatonic(x) and Flurry(x, thomasine) -> Court(x, thomasine)) -> therefore Court(thomasine, thomasine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The moshe is not nonmoving. The moshe is anosmic. The moshe is abstracted. The moshe is not divine. The moshe is algometric. The moshe remit the katheleen. The moshe radio the katheleen. The moshe indorse the katheleen. The katheleen is nonmoving. The katheleen is anosmic. The katheleen is abstracted. The katheleen is divine. The katheleen remit the moshe. The katheleen does not need the moshe. The katheleen indorse the moshe. If someone radio the katheleen and the katheleen radio the moshe then the moshe does not visit the katheleen. If someone remit the moshe and they visit the katheleen then they need the katheleen. If someone indorse the moshe then they visit the katheleen. If someone is abstracted and they need the katheleen then they like the katheleen. If the katheleen is divine then the katheleen remit the moshe. If someone remit the moshe and they do not need the katheleen then the moshe does not like the katheleen. If the moshe does not like the katheleen and the moshe does not need the katheleen then the katheleen is nonmoving. If someone is nonmoving and they do not like the moshe then they are not anosmic. The katheleen does not like the katheleen.", "logic": "\nnot Nonmoving(moshe)\nAnosmic(moshe)\nAbstracted(moshe)\nnot Divine(moshe)\nAlgometric(moshe)\nRemit(moshe, katheleen)\nRadio(moshe, katheleen)\nIndorse(moshe, katheleen)\nNonmoving(katheleen)\nAnosmic(katheleen)\nAbstracted(katheleen)\nDivine(katheleen)\nRemit(katheleen, moshe)\nnot Radio(katheleen, moshe)\nIndorse(katheleen, moshe)\nforall x (Radio(x, katheleen) and Radio(katheleen, moshe) -> not Indorse(moshe, katheleen))\nforall x (Remit(x, moshe) and Indorse(x, katheleen) -> Radio(x, katheleen))\nforall x (Indorse(x, moshe) -> Indorse(x, katheleen))\nforall x (Abstracted(x) and Radio(x, katheleen) -> Remit(x, katheleen))\nDivine(katheleen) -> Remit(katheleen, moshe)\nforall x (Remit(x, moshe) and not Radio(x, katheleen) -> not Remit(moshe, katheleen))\nnot Remit(moshe, katheleen) and not Radio(moshe, katheleen) -> Nonmoving(katheleen)\nforall x (Nonmoving(x) and not Remit(x, moshe) -> not Anosmic(x))\n\nnot Remit(katheleen, katheleen)\n\nIndorse(katheleen, moshe) and forall x (Indorse(x, moshe) -> Indorse(x, katheleen)) -> therefore Indorse(katheleen, katheleen) Remit(katheleen, moshe) and Indorse(katheleen, katheleen) and forall x (Remit(x, moshe) and Indorse(x, katheleen) -> Radio(x, katheleen)) -> therefore Radio(katheleen, katheleen) Abstracted(katheleen) and Radio(katheleen, katheleen) and forall x (Abstracted(x) and Radio(x, katheleen) -> Remit(x, katheleen)) -> therefore Remit(katheleen, katheleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The stillmann is not difficult. The stillmann is ramous. The stillmann is underfed. The stillmann is not cautious. The stillmann is accredited. The stillmann purl the alina. The stillmann mussitate the alina. The stillmann currycomb the alina. The alina is difficult. The alina is ramous. The alina is underfed. The alina is cautious. The alina purl the stillmann. The alina does not need the stillmann. The alina currycomb the stillmann. If someone mussitate the alina and the alina mussitate the stillmann then the stillmann does not visit the alina. If someone purl the stillmann and they visit the alina then they need the alina. If someone currycomb the stillmann then they visit the alina. If someone is underfed and they need the alina then they like the alina. If the alina is cautious then the alina purl the stillmann. If someone purl the stillmann and they do not need the alina then the stillmann does not like the alina. If the stillmann does not like the alina and the stillmann does not need the alina then the alina is difficult. If someone is difficult and they do not like the stillmann then they are not ramous. The stillmann does not like the stillmann.", "logic": "\nnot Difficult(stillmann)\nRamous(stillmann)\nUnderfed(stillmann)\nnot Cautious(stillmann)\nAccredited(stillmann)\nPurl(stillmann, alina)\nMussitate(stillmann, alina)\nCurrycomb(stillmann, alina)\nDifficult(alina)\nRamous(alina)\nUnderfed(alina)\nCautious(alina)\nPurl(alina, stillmann)\nnot Mussitate(alina, stillmann)\nCurrycomb(alina, stillmann)\nforall x (Mussitate(x, alina) and Mussitate(alina, stillmann) -> not Currycomb(stillmann, alina))\nforall x (Purl(x, stillmann) and Currycomb(x, alina) -> Mussitate(x, alina))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, stillmann) -> Currycomb(x, alina))\nforall x (Underfed(x) and Mussitate(x, alina) -> Purl(x, alina))\nCautious(alina) -> Purl(alina, stillmann)\nforall x (Purl(x, stillmann) and not Mussitate(x, alina) -> not Purl(stillmann, alina))\nnot Purl(stillmann, alina) and not Mussitate(stillmann, alina) -> Difficult(alina)\nforall x (Difficult(x) and not Purl(x, stillmann) -> not Ramous(x))\n\nnot Purl(stillmann, stillmann)\n\nnot Purl(stillmann, stillmann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The lani is not dastard. The lani is jordanian. The lani is beefy. The lani is not indicative. The lani is some. The lani redact the christa. The lani valuate the christa. The lani inquire the christa. The christa is dastard. The christa is jordanian. The christa is beefy. The christa is indicative. The christa redact the lani. The christa does not need the lani. The christa inquire the lani. If someone valuate the christa and the christa valuate the lani then the lani does not visit the christa. If someone redact the lani and they visit the christa then they need the christa. If someone inquire the lani then they visit the christa. If someone is beefy and they need the christa then they like the christa. If the christa is indicative then the christa redact the lani. If someone redact the lani and they do not need the christa then the lani does not like the christa. If the lani does not like the christa and the lani does not need the christa then the christa is dastard. If someone is dastard and they do not like the lani then they are not jordanian. The lani inquire the lani.", "logic": "\nnot Dastard(lani)\nJordanian(lani)\nBeefy(lani)\nnot Indicative(lani)\nSome(lani)\nRedact(lani, christa)\nValuate(lani, christa)\nInquire(lani, christa)\nDastard(christa)\nJordanian(christa)\nBeefy(christa)\nIndicative(christa)\nRedact(christa, lani)\nnot Valuate(christa, lani)\nInquire(christa, lani)\nforall x (Valuate(x, christa) and Valuate(christa, lani) -> not Inquire(lani, christa))\nforall x (Redact(x, lani) and Inquire(x, christa) -> Valuate(x, christa))\nforall x (Inquire(x, lani) -> Inquire(x, christa))\nforall x (Beefy(x) and Valuate(x, christa) -> Redact(x, christa))\nIndicative(christa) -> Redact(christa, lani)\nforall x (Redact(x, lani) and not Valuate(x, christa) -> not Redact(lani, christa))\nnot Redact(lani, christa) and not Valuate(lani, christa) -> Dastard(christa)\nforall x (Dastard(x) and not Redact(x, lani) -> not Jordanian(x))\n\nInquire(lani, lani)\n\nInquire(lani, lani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The stafani is not undrained. The stafani is whorled. The stafani is whirring. The stafani is not vinaceous. The stafani is luculent. The stafani stage the tyson. The stafani dredge the tyson. The stafani fast the tyson. The tyson is undrained. The tyson is whorled. The tyson is whirring. The tyson is vinaceous. The tyson stage the stafani. The tyson does not need the stafani. The tyson fast the stafani. If someone dredge the tyson and the tyson dredge the stafani then the stafani does not visit the tyson. If someone stage the stafani and they visit the tyson then they need the tyson. If someone fast the stafani then they visit the tyson. If someone is whirring and they need the tyson then they like the tyson. If the tyson is vinaceous then the tyson stage the stafani. If someone stage the stafani and they do not need the tyson then the stafani does not like the tyson. If the stafani does not like the tyson and the stafani does not need the tyson then the tyson is undrained. If someone is undrained and they do not like the stafani then they are not whorled. The tyson is not luculent.", "logic": "\nnot Undrained(stafani)\nWhorled(stafani)\nWhirring(stafani)\nnot Vinaceous(stafani)\nLuculent(stafani)\nStage(stafani, tyson)\nDredge(stafani, tyson)\nFast(stafani, tyson)\nUndrained(tyson)\nWhorled(tyson)\nWhirring(tyson)\nVinaceous(tyson)\nStage(tyson, stafani)\nnot Dredge(tyson, stafani)\nFast(tyson, stafani)\nforall x (Dredge(x, tyson) and Dredge(tyson, stafani) -> not Fast(stafani, tyson))\nforall x (Stage(x, stafani) and Fast(x, tyson) -> Dredge(x, tyson))\nforall x (Fast(x, stafani) -> Fast(x, tyson))\nforall x (Whirring(x) and Dredge(x, tyson) -> Stage(x, tyson))\nVinaceous(tyson) -> Stage(tyson, stafani)\nforall x (Stage(x, stafani) and not Dredge(x, tyson) -> not Stage(stafani, tyson))\nnot Stage(stafani, tyson) and not Dredge(stafani, tyson) -> Undrained(tyson)\nforall x (Undrained(x) and not Stage(x, stafani) -> not Whorled(x))\n\nnot Luculent(tyson)\n\nnot Luculent(tyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "The griffith is not etiologic. The griffith is humpbacked. The griffith is beatific. The griffith is not epicarpal. The griffith is skirting. The griffith weary the vivianne. The griffith turf the vivianne. The griffith thrill the vivianne. The vivianne is etiologic. The vivianne is humpbacked. The vivianne is beatific. The vivianne is epicarpal. The vivianne weary the griffith. The vivianne does not need the griffith. The vivianne thrill the griffith. If someone turf the vivianne and the vivianne turf the griffith then the griffith does not visit the vivianne. If someone weary the griffith and they visit the vivianne then they need the vivianne. If someone thrill the griffith then they visit the vivianne. If someone is beatific and they need the vivianne then they like the vivianne. If the vivianne is epicarpal then the vivianne weary the griffith. If someone weary the griffith and they do not need the vivianne then the griffith does not like the vivianne. If the griffith does not like the vivianne and the griffith does not need the vivianne then the vivianne is etiologic. If someone is etiologic and they do not like the griffith then they are not humpbacked. The griffith turf the griffith.", "logic": "\nnot Etiologic(griffith)\nHumpbacked(griffith)\nBeatific(griffith)\nnot Epicarpal(griffith)\nSkirting(griffith)\nWeary(griffith, vivianne)\nTurf(griffith, vivianne)\nThrill(griffith, vivianne)\nEtiologic(vivianne)\nHumpbacked(vivianne)\nBeatific(vivianne)\nEpicarpal(vivianne)\nWeary(vivianne, griffith)\nnot Turf(vivianne, griffith)\nThrill(vivianne, griffith)\nforall x (Turf(x, vivianne) and Turf(vivianne, griffith) -> not Thrill(griffith, vivianne))\nforall x (Weary(x, griffith) and Thrill(x, vivianne) -> Turf(x, vivianne))\nforall x (Thrill(x, griffith) -> Thrill(x, vivianne))\nforall x (Beatific(x) and Turf(x, vivianne) -> Weary(x, vivianne))\nEpicarpal(vivianne) -> Weary(vivianne, griffith)\nforall x (Weary(x, griffith) and not Turf(x, vivianne) -> not Weary(griffith, vivianne))\nnot Weary(griffith, vivianne) and not Turf(griffith, vivianne) -> Etiologic(vivianne)\nforall x (Etiologic(x) and not Weary(x, griffith) -> not Humpbacked(x))\n\nTurf(griffith, griffith)\n\nTurf(griffith, griffith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1529"} {"premises": "Melva is viviparous. Kendrick is sinistral. Kendrick is spinous. Mariel is nameless. Mariel is spinous. Mariel is mammoth. Lionel is paranoid. If Lionel is mammoth and Lionel is viviparous then Lionel is sinistral. If someone is nameless then they are seminude. If Lionel is spinous then Lionel is viviparous. All nameless, seminude people are paranoid. Cold people are seminude. All seminude people are sinistral. Red, sinistral people are seminude. White people are viviparous. Melva is viviparous.", "logic": "\nViviparous(melva)\nSinistral(kendrick)\nSpinous(kendrick)\nNameless(mariel)\nSpinous(mariel)\nMammoth(mariel)\nParanoid(lionel)\nMammoth(lionel) and Viviparous(lionel) -> Sinistral(lionel)\nforall x (Nameless(x) -> Seminude(x))\nSpinous(lionel) -> Viviparous(lionel)\nforall x (Nameless(x) and Seminude(x) -> Paranoid(x))\nforall x (Sinistral(x) -> Seminude(x))\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Sinistral(x))\nforall x (Nameless(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Seminude(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) -> Viviparous(x))\n\nViviparous(melva)\n\ntherefore Viviparous(melva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Tomkin is livelong. Wrennie is immaterial. Wrennie is anticipant. Brant is unlighted. Brant is anticipant. Brant is tinkly. Arnie is lancinate. If Arnie is tinkly and Arnie is livelong then Arnie is immaterial. If someone is unlighted then they are czech. If Arnie is anticipant then Arnie is livelong. All unlighted, czech people are lancinate. Cold people are czech. All czech people are immaterial. Red, immaterial people are czech. White people are livelong. Tomkin is not livelong.", "logic": "\nLivelong(tomkin)\nImmaterial(wrennie)\nAnticipant(wrennie)\nUnlighted(brant)\nAnticipant(brant)\nTinkly(brant)\nLancinate(arnie)\nTinkly(arnie) and Livelong(arnie) -> Immaterial(arnie)\nforall x (Unlighted(x) -> Czech(x))\nAnticipant(arnie) -> Livelong(arnie)\nforall x (Unlighted(x) and Czech(x) -> Lancinate(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) -> Czech(x))\nforall x (Czech(x) -> Immaterial(x))\nforall x (Unlighted(x) and Immaterial(x) -> Czech(x))\nforall x (Lancinate(x) -> Livelong(x))\n\nnot Livelong(tomkin)\n\ntherefore Livelong(tomkin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Ramesh is extraneous. Bartel is untellable. Bartel is endemic. Dorthea is soulless. Dorthea is endemic. Dorthea is troublous. Scarlet is octagonal. If Scarlet is troublous and Scarlet is extraneous then Scarlet is untellable. If someone is soulless then they are undefended. If Scarlet is endemic then Scarlet is extraneous. All soulless, undefended people are octagonal. Cold people are undefended. All undefended people are untellable. Red, untellable people are undefended. White people are extraneous. Scarlet is extraneous.", "logic": "\nExtraneous(ramesh)\nUntellable(bartel)\nEndemic(bartel)\nSoulless(dorthea)\nEndemic(dorthea)\nTroublous(dorthea)\nOctagonal(scarlet)\nTroublous(scarlet) and Extraneous(scarlet) -> Untellable(scarlet)\nforall x (Soulless(x) -> Undefended(x))\nEndemic(scarlet) -> Extraneous(scarlet)\nforall x (Soulless(x) and Undefended(x) -> Octagonal(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Undefended(x) -> Untellable(x))\nforall x (Soulless(x) and Untellable(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Octagonal(x) -> Extraneous(x))\n\nExtraneous(scarlet)\n\nOctagonal(scarlet) and forall x (Octagonal(x) -> Extraneous(x)) -> therefore Extraneous(scarlet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Rakel is remittent. Guthry is wailing. Guthry is despairing. Vikky is boss. Vikky is despairing. Vikky is bicameral. Rosie is oxidizable. If Rosie is bicameral and Rosie is remittent then Rosie is wailing. If someone is boss then they are funny. If Rosie is despairing then Rosie is remittent. All boss, funny people are oxidizable. Cold people are funny. All funny people are wailing. Red, wailing people are funny. White people are remittent. Vikky is not funny.", "logic": "\nRemittent(rakel)\nWailing(guthry)\nDespairing(guthry)\nBoss(vikky)\nDespairing(vikky)\nBicameral(vikky)\nOxidizable(rosie)\nBicameral(rosie) and Remittent(rosie) -> Wailing(rosie)\nforall x (Boss(x) -> Funny(x))\nDespairing(rosie) -> Remittent(rosie)\nforall x (Boss(x) and Funny(x) -> Oxidizable(x))\nforall x (Wailing(x) -> Funny(x))\nforall x (Funny(x) -> Wailing(x))\nforall x (Boss(x) and Wailing(x) -> Funny(x))\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) -> Remittent(x))\n\nnot Funny(vikky)\n\nBoss(vikky) and forall x (Boss(x) -> Funny(x)) -> therefore Funny(vikky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Tedman is chivalrous. Leiah is drugged. Leiah is egoistic. Ximenez is unimodal. Ximenez is egoistic. Ximenez is unanimated. Roshelle is splay. If Roshelle is unanimated and Roshelle is chivalrous then Roshelle is drugged. If someone is unimodal then they are estrogenic. If Roshelle is egoistic then Roshelle is chivalrous. All unimodal, estrogenic people are splay. Cold people are estrogenic. All estrogenic people are drugged. Red, drugged people are estrogenic. White people are chivalrous. Ximenez is drugged.", "logic": "\nChivalrous(tedman)\nDrugged(leiah)\nEgoistic(leiah)\nUnimodal(ximenez)\nEgoistic(ximenez)\nUnanimated(ximenez)\nSplay(roshelle)\nUnanimated(roshelle) and Chivalrous(roshelle) -> Drugged(roshelle)\nforall x (Unimodal(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nEgoistic(roshelle) -> Chivalrous(roshelle)\nforall x (Unimodal(x) and Estrogenic(x) -> Splay(x))\nforall x (Drugged(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Estrogenic(x) -> Drugged(x))\nforall x (Unimodal(x) and Drugged(x) -> Estrogenic(x))\nforall x (Splay(x) -> Chivalrous(x))\n\nDrugged(ximenez)\n\nUnimodal(ximenez) and forall x (Unimodal(x) -> Estrogenic(x)) -> therefore Estrogenic(ximenez) Estrogenic(ximenez) and forall x (Estrogenic(x) -> Drugged(x)) -> therefore Drugged(ximenez)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Jeannie is innoxious. Bing is respondent. Bing is gasified. Winslow is razorback. Winslow is gasified. Winslow is wysiwyg. Endora is winded. If Endora is wysiwyg and Endora is innoxious then Endora is respondent. If someone is razorback then they are lotic. If Endora is gasified then Endora is innoxious. All razorback, lotic people are winded. Cold people are lotic. All lotic people are respondent. Red, respondent people are lotic. White people are innoxious. Winslow is not winded.", "logic": "\nInnoxious(jeannie)\nRespondent(bing)\nGasified(bing)\nRazorback(winslow)\nGasified(winslow)\nWysiwyg(winslow)\nWinded(endora)\nWysiwyg(endora) and Innoxious(endora) -> Respondent(endora)\nforall x (Razorback(x) -> Lotic(x))\nGasified(endora) -> Innoxious(endora)\nforall x (Razorback(x) and Lotic(x) -> Winded(x))\nforall x (Respondent(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Lotic(x) -> Respondent(x))\nforall x (Razorback(x) and Respondent(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Winded(x) -> Innoxious(x))\n\nnot Winded(winslow)\n\nRazorback(winslow) and forall x (Razorback(x) -> Lotic(x)) -> therefore Lotic(winslow) Razorback(winslow) and Lotic(winslow) and forall x (Razorback(x) and Lotic(x) -> Winded(x)) -> therefore Winded(winslow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Linoel is buttony. Blare is zealous. Blare is regulated. Rozalin is optimal. Rozalin is regulated. Rozalin is paroicous. Winifred is affinal. If Winifred is paroicous and Winifred is buttony then Winifred is zealous. If someone is optimal then they are midget. If Winifred is regulated then Winifred is buttony. All optimal, midget people are affinal. Cold people are midget. All midget people are zealous. Red, zealous people are midget. White people are buttony. Rozalin is buttony.", "logic": "\nButtony(linoel)\nZealous(blare)\nRegulated(blare)\nOptimal(rozalin)\nRegulated(rozalin)\nParoicous(rozalin)\nAffinal(winifred)\nParoicous(winifred) and Buttony(winifred) -> Zealous(winifred)\nforall x (Optimal(x) -> Midget(x))\nRegulated(winifred) -> Buttony(winifred)\nforall x (Optimal(x) and Midget(x) -> Affinal(x))\nforall x (Zealous(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Midget(x) -> Zealous(x))\nforall x (Optimal(x) and Zealous(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Affinal(x) -> Buttony(x))\n\nButtony(rozalin)\n\nOptimal(rozalin) and forall x (Optimal(x) -> Midget(x)) -> therefore Midget(rozalin) Optimal(rozalin) and Midget(rozalin) and forall x (Optimal(x) and Midget(x) -> Affinal(x)) -> therefore Affinal(rozalin) Affinal(rozalin) and forall x (Affinal(x) -> Buttony(x)) -> therefore Buttony(rozalin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Bethany is feisty. Reba is blustering. Reba is smokeless. Angelique is archetypal. Angelique is smokeless. Angelique is tantric. Denise is neat. If Denise is tantric and Denise is feisty then Denise is blustering. If someone is archetypal then they are tawny. If Denise is smokeless then Denise is feisty. All archetypal, tawny people are neat. Cold people are tawny. All tawny people are blustering. Red, blustering people are tawny. White people are feisty. Angelique is not feisty.", "logic": "\nFeisty(bethany)\nBlustering(reba)\nSmokeless(reba)\nArchetypal(angelique)\nSmokeless(angelique)\nTantric(angelique)\nNeat(denise)\nTantric(denise) and Feisty(denise) -> Blustering(denise)\nforall x (Archetypal(x) -> Tawny(x))\nSmokeless(denise) -> Feisty(denise)\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and Tawny(x) -> Neat(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) -> Tawny(x))\nforall x (Tawny(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and Blustering(x) -> Tawny(x))\nforall x (Neat(x) -> Feisty(x))\n\nnot Feisty(angelique)\n\nArchetypal(angelique) and forall x (Archetypal(x) -> Tawny(x)) -> therefore Tawny(angelique) Archetypal(angelique) and Tawny(angelique) and forall x (Archetypal(x) and Tawny(x) -> Neat(x)) -> therefore Neat(angelique) Neat(angelique) and forall x (Neat(x) -> Feisty(x)) -> therefore Feisty(angelique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Cacilia is biennial. Percy is symbolical. Percy is polygynous. Shepherd is cutaneous. Shepherd is polygynous. Shepherd is rotatory. Larry is phrenic. If Larry is rotatory and Larry is biennial then Larry is symbolical. If someone is cutaneous then they are stray. If Larry is polygynous then Larry is biennial. All cutaneous, stray people are phrenic. Cold people are stray. All stray people are symbolical. Red, symbolical people are stray. White people are biennial. Cacilia is not stray.", "logic": "\nBiennial(cacilia)\nSymbolical(percy)\nPolygynous(percy)\nCutaneous(shepherd)\nPolygynous(shepherd)\nRotatory(shepherd)\nPhrenic(larry)\nRotatory(larry) and Biennial(larry) -> Symbolical(larry)\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Stray(x))\nPolygynous(larry) -> Biennial(larry)\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) and Stray(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Symbolical(x) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Stray(x) -> Symbolical(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) and Symbolical(x) -> Stray(x))\nforall x (Phrenic(x) -> Biennial(x))\n\nnot Stray(cacilia)\n\nforall x (Symbolical(x) -> Stray(x)) <- forall x (Stray(x) -> Symbolical(x)) <- forall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Stray(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Yule is rimose. Carleen is pentagonal. Carleen is riant. Aldwin is baseless. Aldwin is riant. Aldwin is fulminant. Alla is consular. If Alla is fulminant and Alla is rimose then Alla is pentagonal. If someone is baseless then they are enveloping. If Alla is riant then Alla is rimose. All baseless, enveloping people are consular. Cold people are enveloping. All enveloping people are pentagonal. Red, pentagonal people are enveloping. White people are rimose. Carleen is rimose.", "logic": "\nRimose(yule)\nPentagonal(carleen)\nRiant(carleen)\nBaseless(aldwin)\nRiant(aldwin)\nFulminant(aldwin)\nConsular(alla)\nFulminant(alla) and Rimose(alla) -> Pentagonal(alla)\nforall x (Baseless(x) -> Enveloping(x))\nRiant(alla) -> Rimose(alla)\nforall x (Baseless(x) and Enveloping(x) -> Consular(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Enveloping(x))\nforall x (Enveloping(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Baseless(x) and Pentagonal(x) -> Enveloping(x))\nforall x (Consular(x) -> Rimose(x))\n\nRimose(carleen)\n\nforall x (Consular(x) -> Rimose(x)) <- forall x (Baseless(x) and Enveloping(x) -> Consular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Henrie is acute. Kaleena is tenable. Kaleena is anoxic. Livia is waxy. Livia is anoxic. Livia is tonic. Denyse is nonkosher. If Denyse is tonic and Denyse is acute then Denyse is tenable. If someone is waxy then they are banned. If Denyse is anoxic then Denyse is acute. All waxy, banned people are nonkosher. Cold people are banned. All banned people are tenable. Red, tenable people are banned. White people are acute. Denyse is not banned.", "logic": "\nAcute(henrie)\nTenable(kaleena)\nAnoxic(kaleena)\nWaxy(livia)\nAnoxic(livia)\nTonic(livia)\nNonkosher(denyse)\nTonic(denyse) and Acute(denyse) -> Tenable(denyse)\nforall x (Waxy(x) -> Banned(x))\nAnoxic(denyse) -> Acute(denyse)\nforall x (Waxy(x) and Banned(x) -> Nonkosher(x))\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) -> Tenable(x))\nforall x (Waxy(x) and Tenable(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Nonkosher(x) -> Acute(x))\n\nnot Banned(denyse)\n\nforall x (Tenable(x) -> Banned(x)) <- forall x (Banned(x) -> Tenable(x)) <- forall x (Waxy(x) -> Banned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Rikki is upturned. Leoine is outlying. Leoine is hurried. Demetrius is little. Demetrius is hurried. Demetrius is effete. Zorana is unobvious. If Zorana is effete and Zorana is upturned then Zorana is outlying. If someone is little then they are fugitive. If Zorana is hurried then Zorana is upturned. All little, fugitive people are unobvious. Cold people are fugitive. All fugitive people are outlying. Red, outlying people are fugitive. White people are upturned. Rikki is unobvious.", "logic": "\nUpturned(rikki)\nOutlying(leoine)\nHurried(leoine)\nLittle(demetrius)\nHurried(demetrius)\nEffete(demetrius)\nUnobvious(zorana)\nEffete(zorana) and Upturned(zorana) -> Outlying(zorana)\nforall x (Little(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nHurried(zorana) -> Upturned(zorana)\nforall x (Little(x) and Fugitive(x) -> Unobvious(x))\nforall x (Outlying(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Fugitive(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Little(x) and Outlying(x) -> Fugitive(x))\nforall x (Unobvious(x) -> Upturned(x))\n\nUnobvious(rikki)\n\nforall x (Little(x) and Fugitive(x) -> Unobvious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Prent is intangible. Shayne is hilar. Shayne is lucent. Diann is guided. Diann is lucent. Diann is apraxic. Frayda is buttery. If Frayda is apraxic and Frayda is intangible then Frayda is hilar. If someone is guided then they are pureblood. If Frayda is lucent then Frayda is intangible. All guided, pureblood people are buttery. Cold people are pureblood. All pureblood people are hilar. Red, hilar people are pureblood. White people are intangible. Shayne is not guided.", "logic": "\nIntangible(prent)\nHilar(shayne)\nLucent(shayne)\nGuided(diann)\nLucent(diann)\nApraxic(diann)\nButtery(frayda)\nApraxic(frayda) and Intangible(frayda) -> Hilar(frayda)\nforall x (Guided(x) -> Pureblood(x))\nLucent(frayda) -> Intangible(frayda)\nforall x (Guided(x) and Pureblood(x) -> Buttery(x))\nforall x (Hilar(x) -> Pureblood(x))\nforall x (Pureblood(x) -> Hilar(x))\nforall x (Guided(x) and Hilar(x) -> Pureblood(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> Intangible(x))\n\nnot Guided(shayne)\n\nnot Guided(shayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Cordula is tearless. Norwood is motive. Norwood is scottish. Amanda is pessimal. Amanda is scottish. Amanda is parentless. Josee is biliary. If Josee is parentless and Josee is tearless then Josee is motive. If someone is pessimal then they are soleless. If Josee is scottish then Josee is tearless. All pessimal, soleless people are biliary. Cold people are soleless. All soleless people are motive. Red, motive people are soleless. White people are tearless. Cordula is scottish.", "logic": "\nTearless(cordula)\nMotive(norwood)\nScottish(norwood)\nPessimal(amanda)\nScottish(amanda)\nParentless(amanda)\nBiliary(josee)\nParentless(josee) and Tearless(josee) -> Motive(josee)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> Soleless(x))\nScottish(josee) -> Tearless(josee)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Soleless(x) -> Biliary(x))\nforall x (Motive(x) -> Soleless(x))\nforall x (Soleless(x) -> Motive(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Motive(x) -> Soleless(x))\nforall x (Biliary(x) -> Tearless(x))\n\nScottish(cordula)\n\nScottish(cordula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Sully is african. Sayres is fitted. Sayres is planate. Elle is metabolic. Elle is planate. Elle is baptized. Ragnar is corky. If Ragnar is baptized and Ragnar is african then Ragnar is fitted. If someone is metabolic then they are modeled. If Ragnar is planate then Ragnar is african. All metabolic, modeled people are corky. Cold people are modeled. All modeled people are fitted. Red, fitted people are modeled. White people are african. Ragnar is not metabolic.", "logic": "\nAfrican(sully)\nFitted(sayres)\nPlanate(sayres)\nMetabolic(elle)\nPlanate(elle)\nBaptized(elle)\nCorky(ragnar)\nBaptized(ragnar) and African(ragnar) -> Fitted(ragnar)\nforall x (Metabolic(x) -> Modeled(x))\nPlanate(ragnar) -> African(ragnar)\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Modeled(x) -> Corky(x))\nforall x (Fitted(x) -> Modeled(x))\nforall x (Modeled(x) -> Fitted(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Fitted(x) -> Modeled(x))\nforall x (Corky(x) -> African(x))\n\nnot Metabolic(ragnar)\n\nnot Metabolic(ragnar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "Nicolea is situated. Briney is sixteenth. Briney is unglazed. Rubia is ascendent. Rubia is unglazed. Rubia is entangled. Forester is illiberal. If Forester is entangled and Forester is situated then Forester is sixteenth. If someone is ascendent then they are curving. If Forester is unglazed then Forester is situated. All ascendent, curving people are illiberal. Cold people are curving. All curving people are sixteenth. Red, sixteenth people are curving. White people are situated. Nicolea is entangled.", "logic": "\nSituated(nicolea)\nSixteenth(briney)\nUnglazed(briney)\nAscendent(rubia)\nUnglazed(rubia)\nEntangled(rubia)\nIlliberal(forester)\nEntangled(forester) and Situated(forester) -> Sixteenth(forester)\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> Curving(x))\nUnglazed(forester) -> Situated(forester)\nforall x (Ascendent(x) and Curving(x) -> Illiberal(x))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Sixteenth(x))\nforall x (Ascendent(x) and Sixteenth(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) -> Situated(x))\n\nEntangled(nicolea)\n\nEntangled(nicolea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1291"} {"premises": "The frederik terrorise the jakob. The frederik is jawless. The frederik is effluent. The frederik is moveable. The frederik dabble the jakob. The frederik invite the jakob. The jakob terrorise the frederik. The jakob is jawless. The jakob is zolaesque. The jakob is moveable. The jakob dabble the frederik. The jakob invite the frederik. If the jakob is jawless then the jakob is cloaked. If something invite the jakob then it dabble the jakob. If something is cloaked and it terrorise the frederik then it invite the jakob. The jakob is moveable.", "logic": "\nTerrorise(frederik, jakob)\nJawless(frederik)\nEffluent(frederik)\nMoveable(frederik)\nDabble(frederik, jakob)\nInvite(frederik, jakob)\nTerrorise(jakob, frederik)\nJawless(jakob)\nZolaesque(jakob)\nMoveable(jakob)\nDabble(jakob, frederik)\nInvite(jakob, frederik)\nJawless(jakob) -> Cloaked(jakob)\nforall x (Invite(x, jakob) -> Dabble(x, jakob))\nforall x (Cloaked(x) and Terrorise(x, frederik) -> Invite(x, jakob))\n\nMoveable(jakob)\n\ntherefore Moveable(jakob)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The hamel befog the myrta. The hamel is bowelless. The hamel is capital. The hamel is seamanly. The hamel riot the myrta. The hamel mist the myrta. The myrta befog the hamel. The myrta is bowelless. The myrta is juxtaposed. The myrta is seamanly. The myrta riot the hamel. The myrta mist the hamel. If the myrta is bowelless then the myrta is convenient. If something mist the myrta then it riot the myrta. If something is convenient and it befog the hamel then it mist the myrta. The hamel does not need the myrta.", "logic": "\nBefog(hamel, myrta)\nBowelless(hamel)\nCapital(hamel)\nSeamanly(hamel)\nRiot(hamel, myrta)\nMist(hamel, myrta)\nBefog(myrta, hamel)\nBowelless(myrta)\nJuxtaposed(myrta)\nSeamanly(myrta)\nRiot(myrta, hamel)\nMist(myrta, hamel)\nBowelless(myrta) -> Convenient(myrta)\nforall x (Mist(x, myrta) -> Riot(x, myrta))\nforall x (Convenient(x) and Befog(x, hamel) -> Mist(x, myrta))\n\nnot Riot(hamel, myrta)\n\ntherefore Riot(hamel, myrta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The jeremy front the dea. The jeremy is sybaritic. The jeremy is posh. The jeremy is blastemal. The jeremy chink the dea. The jeremy gauffer the dea. The dea front the jeremy. The dea is sybaritic. The dea is conscious. The dea is blastemal. The dea chink the jeremy. The dea gauffer the jeremy. If the dea is sybaritic then the dea is laciniate. If something gauffer the dea then it chink the dea. If something is laciniate and it front the jeremy then it gauffer the dea. The dea is laciniate.", "logic": "\nFront(jeremy, dea)\nSybaritic(jeremy)\nPosh(jeremy)\nBlastemal(jeremy)\nChink(jeremy, dea)\nGauffer(jeremy, dea)\nFront(dea, jeremy)\nSybaritic(dea)\nConscious(dea)\nBlastemal(dea)\nChink(dea, jeremy)\nGauffer(dea, jeremy)\nSybaritic(dea) -> Laciniate(dea)\nforall x (Gauffer(x, dea) -> Chink(x, dea))\nforall x (Laciniate(x) and Front(x, jeremy) -> Gauffer(x, dea))\n\nLaciniate(dea)\n\nSybaritic(dea) and Sybaritic(dea) -> Laciniate(dea) -> therefore Laciniate(dea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The jonathan refute the angelina. The jonathan is talismanic. The jonathan is mighty. The jonathan is salverform. The jonathan ghettoise the angelina. The jonathan patrol the angelina. The angelina refute the jonathan. The angelina is talismanic. The angelina is onomastic. The angelina is salverform. The angelina ghettoise the jonathan. The angelina patrol the jonathan. If the angelina is talismanic then the angelina is acapnial. If something patrol the angelina then it ghettoise the angelina. If something is acapnial and it refute the jonathan then it patrol the angelina. The angelina is not acapnial.", "logic": "\nRefute(jonathan, angelina)\nTalismanic(jonathan)\nMighty(jonathan)\nSalverform(jonathan)\nGhettoise(jonathan, angelina)\nPatrol(jonathan, angelina)\nRefute(angelina, jonathan)\nTalismanic(angelina)\nOnomastic(angelina)\nSalverform(angelina)\nGhettoise(angelina, jonathan)\nPatrol(angelina, jonathan)\nTalismanic(angelina) -> Acapnial(angelina)\nforall x (Patrol(x, angelina) -> Ghettoise(x, angelina))\nforall x (Acapnial(x) and Refute(x, jonathan) -> Patrol(x, angelina))\n\nnot Acapnial(angelina)\n\nTalismanic(angelina) and Talismanic(angelina) -> Acapnial(angelina) -> therefore Acapnial(angelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The mitchell heal the othella. The mitchell is visualised. The mitchell is cisalpine. The mitchell is ageless. The mitchell time the othella. The mitchell cover the othella. The othella heal the mitchell. The othella is visualised. The othella is rectified. The othella is ageless. The othella time the mitchell. The othella cover the mitchell. If the othella is visualised then the othella is ceaseless. If something cover the othella then it time the othella. If something is ceaseless and it heal the mitchell then it cover the othella. The othella cover the othella.", "logic": "\nHeal(mitchell, othella)\nVisualised(mitchell)\nCisalpine(mitchell)\nAgeless(mitchell)\nTime(mitchell, othella)\nCover(mitchell, othella)\nHeal(othella, mitchell)\nVisualised(othella)\nRectified(othella)\nAgeless(othella)\nTime(othella, mitchell)\nCover(othella, mitchell)\nVisualised(othella) -> Ceaseless(othella)\nforall x (Cover(x, othella) -> Time(x, othella))\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) and Heal(x, mitchell) -> Cover(x, othella))\n\nCover(othella, othella)\n\nVisualised(othella) and Visualised(othella) -> Ceaseless(othella) -> therefore Ceaseless(othella) Ceaseless(othella) and Heal(othella, mitchell) and forall x (Ceaseless(x) and Heal(x, mitchell) -> Cover(x, othella)) -> therefore Cover(othella, othella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The imogen doom the vicki. The imogen is acaudal. The imogen is acropetal. The imogen is palladian. The imogen snore the vicki. The imogen power the vicki. The vicki doom the imogen. The vicki is acaudal. The vicki is rheumatic. The vicki is palladian. The vicki snore the imogen. The vicki power the imogen. If the vicki is acaudal then the vicki is attenuated. If something power the vicki then it snore the vicki. If something is attenuated and it doom the imogen then it power the vicki. The vicki does not visit the vicki.", "logic": "\nDoom(imogen, vicki)\nAcaudal(imogen)\nAcropetal(imogen)\nPalladian(imogen)\nSnore(imogen, vicki)\nPower(imogen, vicki)\nDoom(vicki, imogen)\nAcaudal(vicki)\nRheumatic(vicki)\nPalladian(vicki)\nSnore(vicki, imogen)\nPower(vicki, imogen)\nAcaudal(vicki) -> Attenuated(vicki)\nforall x (Power(x, vicki) -> Snore(x, vicki))\nforall x (Attenuated(x) and Doom(x, imogen) -> Power(x, vicki))\n\nnot Power(vicki, vicki)\n\nAcaudal(vicki) and Acaudal(vicki) -> Attenuated(vicki) -> therefore Attenuated(vicki) Attenuated(vicki) and Doom(vicki, imogen) and forall x (Attenuated(x) and Doom(x, imogen) -> Power(x, vicki)) -> therefore Power(vicki, vicki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The richard weather the palmer. The richard is wraithlike. The richard is mass. The richard is glary. The richard bewitch the palmer. The richard fertilize the palmer. The palmer weather the richard. The palmer is wraithlike. The palmer is vietnamese. The palmer is glary. The palmer bewitch the richard. The palmer fertilize the richard. If the palmer is wraithlike then the palmer is guttural. If something fertilize the palmer then it bewitch the palmer. If something is guttural and it weather the richard then it fertilize the palmer. The palmer bewitch the palmer.", "logic": "\nWeather(richard, palmer)\nWraithlike(richard)\nMass(richard)\nGlary(richard)\nBewitch(richard, palmer)\nFertilize(richard, palmer)\nWeather(palmer, richard)\nWraithlike(palmer)\nVietnamese(palmer)\nGlary(palmer)\nBewitch(palmer, richard)\nFertilize(palmer, richard)\nWraithlike(palmer) -> Guttural(palmer)\nforall x (Fertilize(x, palmer) -> Bewitch(x, palmer))\nforall x (Guttural(x) and Weather(x, richard) -> Fertilize(x, palmer))\n\nBewitch(palmer, palmer)\n\nWraithlike(palmer) and Wraithlike(palmer) -> Guttural(palmer) -> therefore Guttural(palmer) Guttural(palmer) and Weather(palmer, richard) and forall x (Guttural(x) and Weather(x, richard) -> Fertilize(x, palmer)) -> therefore Fertilize(palmer, palmer) Fertilize(palmer, palmer) and forall x (Fertilize(x, palmer) -> Bewitch(x, palmer)) -> therefore Bewitch(palmer, palmer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The yetty depict the ambrosius. The yetty is lowbrowed. The yetty is nonsweet. The yetty is leafy. The yetty interlude the ambrosius. The yetty constringe the ambrosius. The ambrosius depict the yetty. The ambrosius is lowbrowed. The ambrosius is proofed. The ambrosius is leafy. The ambrosius interlude the yetty. The ambrosius constringe the yetty. If the ambrosius is lowbrowed then the ambrosius is collarless. If something constringe the ambrosius then it interlude the ambrosius. If something is collarless and it depict the yetty then it constringe the ambrosius. The ambrosius does not need the ambrosius.", "logic": "\nDepict(yetty, ambrosius)\nLowbrowed(yetty)\nNonsweet(yetty)\nLeafy(yetty)\nInterlude(yetty, ambrosius)\nConstringe(yetty, ambrosius)\nDepict(ambrosius, yetty)\nLowbrowed(ambrosius)\nProofed(ambrosius)\nLeafy(ambrosius)\nInterlude(ambrosius, yetty)\nConstringe(ambrosius, yetty)\nLowbrowed(ambrosius) -> Collarless(ambrosius)\nforall x (Constringe(x, ambrosius) -> Interlude(x, ambrosius))\nforall x (Collarless(x) and Depict(x, yetty) -> Constringe(x, ambrosius))\n\nnot Interlude(ambrosius, ambrosius)\n\nLowbrowed(ambrosius) and Lowbrowed(ambrosius) -> Collarless(ambrosius) -> therefore Collarless(ambrosius) Collarless(ambrosius) and Depict(ambrosius, yetty) and forall x (Collarless(x) and Depict(x, yetty) -> Constringe(x, ambrosius)) -> therefore Constringe(ambrosius, ambrosius) Constringe(ambrosius, ambrosius) and forall x (Constringe(x, ambrosius) -> Interlude(x, ambrosius)) -> therefore Interlude(ambrosius, ambrosius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The marinna flitter the morty. The marinna is polygonal. The marinna is multilane. The marinna is hypodermal. The marinna scum the morty. The marinna swosh the morty. The morty flitter the marinna. The morty is polygonal. The morty is untaught. The morty is hypodermal. The morty scum the marinna. The morty swosh the marinna. If the morty is polygonal then the morty is rowdy. If something swosh the morty then it scum the morty. If something is rowdy and it flitter the marinna then it swosh the morty. The marinna does not eat the marinna.", "logic": "\nFlitter(marinna, morty)\nPolygonal(marinna)\nMultilane(marinna)\nHypodermal(marinna)\nScum(marinna, morty)\nSwosh(marinna, morty)\nFlitter(morty, marinna)\nPolygonal(morty)\nUntaught(morty)\nHypodermal(morty)\nScum(morty, marinna)\nSwosh(morty, marinna)\nPolygonal(morty) -> Rowdy(morty)\nforall x (Swosh(x, morty) -> Scum(x, morty))\nforall x (Rowdy(x) and Flitter(x, marinna) -> Swosh(x, morty))\n\nnot Flitter(marinna, marinna)\n\nnot Flitter(marinna, marinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The jodi inundate the clarinda. The jodi is imaginable. The jodi is heated. The jodi is energising. The jodi pester the clarinda. The jodi revert the clarinda. The clarinda inundate the jodi. The clarinda is imaginable. The clarinda is obligated. The clarinda is energising. The clarinda pester the jodi. The clarinda revert the jodi. If the clarinda is imaginable then the clarinda is worried. If something revert the clarinda then it pester the clarinda. If something is worried and it inundate the jodi then it revert the clarinda. The jodi is obligated.", "logic": "\nInundate(jodi, clarinda)\nImaginable(jodi)\nHeated(jodi)\nEnergising(jodi)\nPester(jodi, clarinda)\nRevert(jodi, clarinda)\nInundate(clarinda, jodi)\nImaginable(clarinda)\nObligated(clarinda)\nEnergising(clarinda)\nPester(clarinda, jodi)\nRevert(clarinda, jodi)\nImaginable(clarinda) -> Worried(clarinda)\nforall x (Revert(x, clarinda) -> Pester(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Worried(x) and Inundate(x, jodi) -> Revert(x, clarinda))\n\nObligated(jodi)\n\nObligated(jodi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The adam regularise the cicily. The adam is bright. The adam is sere. The adam is unmannerly. The adam bloody the cicily. The adam last the cicily. The cicily regularise the adam. The cicily is bright. The cicily is belemnitic. The cicily is unmannerly. The cicily bloody the adam. The cicily last the adam. If the cicily is bright then the cicily is permanent. If something last the cicily then it bloody the cicily. If something is permanent and it regularise the adam then it last the cicily. The adam is not permanent.", "logic": "\nRegularise(adam, cicily)\nBright(adam)\nSere(adam)\nUnmannerly(adam)\nBloody(adam, cicily)\nLast(adam, cicily)\nRegularise(cicily, adam)\nBright(cicily)\nBelemnitic(cicily)\nUnmannerly(cicily)\nBloody(cicily, adam)\nLast(cicily, adam)\nBright(cicily) -> Permanent(cicily)\nforall x (Last(x, cicily) -> Bloody(x, cicily))\nforall x (Permanent(x) and Regularise(x, adam) -> Last(x, cicily))\n\nnot Permanent(adam)\n\nnot Permanent(adam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The dorothea outspan the annalise. The dorothea is prox. The dorothea is idealised. The dorothea is insipid. The dorothea twang the annalise. The dorothea adore the annalise. The annalise outspan the dorothea. The annalise is prox. The annalise is pained. The annalise is insipid. The annalise twang the dorothea. The annalise adore the dorothea. If the annalise is prox then the annalise is mocking. If something adore the annalise then it twang the annalise. If something is mocking and it outspan the dorothea then it adore the annalise. The dorothea twang the dorothea.", "logic": "\nOutspan(dorothea, annalise)\nProx(dorothea)\nIdealised(dorothea)\nInsipid(dorothea)\nTwang(dorothea, annalise)\nAdore(dorothea, annalise)\nOutspan(annalise, dorothea)\nProx(annalise)\nPained(annalise)\nInsipid(annalise)\nTwang(annalise, dorothea)\nAdore(annalise, dorothea)\nProx(annalise) -> Mocking(annalise)\nforall x (Adore(x, annalise) -> Twang(x, annalise))\nforall x (Mocking(x) and Outspan(x, dorothea) -> Adore(x, annalise))\n\nTwang(dorothea, dorothea)\n\nTwang(dorothea, dorothea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The odele spud the halette. The odele is artful. The odele is uninvited. The odele is agog. The odele avalanche the halette. The odele discount the halette. The halette spud the odele. The halette is artful. The halette is unwrapped. The halette is agog. The halette avalanche the odele. The halette discount the odele. If the halette is artful then the halette is limbed. If something discount the halette then it avalanche the halette. If something is limbed and it spud the odele then it discount the halette. The odele does not visit the odele.", "logic": "\nSpud(odele, halette)\nArtful(odele)\nUninvited(odele)\nAgog(odele)\nAvalanche(odele, halette)\nDiscount(odele, halette)\nSpud(halette, odele)\nArtful(halette)\nUnwrapped(halette)\nAgog(halette)\nAvalanche(halette, odele)\nDiscount(halette, odele)\nArtful(halette) -> Limbed(halette)\nforall x (Discount(x, halette) -> Avalanche(x, halette))\nforall x (Limbed(x) and Spud(x, odele) -> Discount(x, halette))\n\nnot Discount(odele, odele)\n\nnot Discount(odele, odele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "The skipp market the clary. The skipp is tegular. The skipp is inducive. The skipp is unshaded. The skipp decrease the clary. The skipp aggrandize the clary. The clary market the skipp. The clary is tegular. The clary is stoppered. The clary is unshaded. The clary decrease the skipp. The clary aggrandize the skipp. If the clary is tegular then the clary is agrologic. If something aggrandize the clary then it decrease the clary. If something is agrologic and it market the skipp then it aggrandize the clary. The clary is inducive.", "logic": "\nMarket(skipp, clary)\nTegular(skipp)\nInducive(skipp)\nUnshaded(skipp)\nDecrease(skipp, clary)\nAggrandize(skipp, clary)\nMarket(clary, skipp)\nTegular(clary)\nStoppered(clary)\nUnshaded(clary)\nDecrease(clary, skipp)\nAggrandize(clary, skipp)\nTegular(clary) -> Agrologic(clary)\nforall x (Aggrandize(x, clary) -> Decrease(x, clary))\nforall x (Agrologic(x) and Market(x, skipp) -> Aggrandize(x, clary))\n\nInducive(clary)\n\nInducive(clary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-637"} {"premises": "Karna is shrill. Karna is offstage. Llewellyn is lentic. Llewellyn is lviii. Llewellyn is offstage. Freddi is lentic. Freddi is offstage. If someone is rabbinic and offstage then they are shrill. Blue, lentic people are subdural. White people are rabbinic. Karna is shrill.", "logic": "\nShrill(karna)\nOffstage(karna)\nLentic(llewellyn)\nLviii(llewellyn)\nOffstage(llewellyn)\nLentic(freddi)\nOffstage(freddi)\nforall x (Rabbinic(x) and Offstage(x) -> Shrill(x))\nforall x (Shrill(x) and Lentic(x) -> Subdural(x))\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Rabbinic(x))\n\nShrill(karna)\n\ntherefore Shrill(karna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Robbie is cognate. Robbie is clayey. Kerrill is shellproof. Kerrill is ectozoan. Kerrill is clayey. Derick is shellproof. Derick is clayey. If someone is lemonlike and clayey then they are cognate. Blue, shellproof people are unwearying. White people are lemonlike. Kerrill is not ectozoan.", "logic": "\nCognate(robbie)\nClayey(robbie)\nShellproof(kerrill)\nEctozoan(kerrill)\nClayey(kerrill)\nShellproof(derick)\nClayey(derick)\nforall x (Lemonlike(x) and Clayey(x) -> Cognate(x))\nforall x (Cognate(x) and Shellproof(x) -> Unwearying(x))\nforall x (Clayey(x) -> Lemonlike(x))\n\nnot Ectozoan(kerrill)\n\ntherefore Ectozoan(kerrill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Chery is acapnic. Chery is mired. Ardith is dialectic. Ardith is phosphoric. Ardith is mired. Janis is dialectic. Janis is mired. If someone is uneasy and mired then they are acapnic. Blue, dialectic people are ergodic. White people are uneasy. Chery is uneasy.", "logic": "\nAcapnic(chery)\nMired(chery)\nDialectic(ardith)\nPhosphoric(ardith)\nMired(ardith)\nDialectic(janis)\nMired(janis)\nforall x (Uneasy(x) and Mired(x) -> Acapnic(x))\nforall x (Acapnic(x) and Dialectic(x) -> Ergodic(x))\nforall x (Mired(x) -> Uneasy(x))\n\nUneasy(chery)\n\nMired(chery) and forall x (Mired(x) -> Uneasy(x)) -> therefore Uneasy(chery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Natalina is bahamian. Natalina is mitigated. Milt is voltaic. Milt is racking. Milt is mitigated. Patrica is voltaic. Patrica is mitigated. If someone is palpatory and mitigated then they are bahamian. Blue, voltaic people are bouncy. White people are palpatory. Natalina is not palpatory.", "logic": "\nBahamian(natalina)\nMitigated(natalina)\nVoltaic(milt)\nRacking(milt)\nMitigated(milt)\nVoltaic(patrica)\nMitigated(patrica)\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Mitigated(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) and Voltaic(x) -> Bouncy(x))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) -> Palpatory(x))\n\nnot Palpatory(natalina)\n\nMitigated(natalina) and forall x (Mitigated(x) -> Palpatory(x)) -> therefore Palpatory(natalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Frederico is aboral. Frederico is agonistic. Bess is clouded. Bess is brutish. Bess is agonistic. Tallia is clouded. Tallia is agonistic. If someone is unsporting and agonistic then they are aboral. Blue, clouded people are volunteer. White people are unsporting. Tallia is aboral.", "logic": "\nAboral(frederico)\nAgonistic(frederico)\nClouded(bess)\nBrutish(bess)\nAgonistic(bess)\nClouded(tallia)\nAgonistic(tallia)\nforall x (Unsporting(x) and Agonistic(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Aboral(x) and Clouded(x) -> Volunteer(x))\nforall x (Agonistic(x) -> Unsporting(x))\n\nAboral(tallia)\n\nAgonistic(tallia) and forall x (Agonistic(x) -> Unsporting(x)) -> therefore Unsporting(tallia) Unsporting(tallia) and Agonistic(tallia) and forall x (Unsporting(x) and Agonistic(x) -> Aboral(x)) -> therefore Aboral(tallia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Hermia is winless. Hermia is blinding. Simon is copasetic. Simon is saucy. Simon is blinding. Renard is copasetic. Renard is blinding. If someone is cordial and blinding then they are winless. Blue, copasetic people are despotical. White people are cordial. Simon is not winless.", "logic": "\nWinless(hermia)\nBlinding(hermia)\nCopasetic(simon)\nSaucy(simon)\nBlinding(simon)\nCopasetic(renard)\nBlinding(renard)\nforall x (Cordial(x) and Blinding(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) and Copasetic(x) -> Despotical(x))\nforall x (Blinding(x) -> Cordial(x))\n\nnot Winless(simon)\n\nBlinding(simon) and forall x (Blinding(x) -> Cordial(x)) -> therefore Cordial(simon) Cordial(simon) and Blinding(simon) and forall x (Cordial(x) and Blinding(x) -> Winless(x)) -> therefore Winless(simon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Camile is increasing. Camile is brunette. Maya is aquiferous. Maya is howling. Maya is brunette. Barby is aquiferous. Barby is brunette. If someone is feculent and brunette then they are increasing. Blue, aquiferous people are joking. White people are feculent. Barby is joking.", "logic": "\nIncreasing(camile)\nBrunette(camile)\nAquiferous(maya)\nHowling(maya)\nBrunette(maya)\nAquiferous(barby)\nBrunette(barby)\nforall x (Feculent(x) and Brunette(x) -> Increasing(x))\nforall x (Increasing(x) and Aquiferous(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Feculent(x))\n\nJoking(barby)\n\nBrunette(barby) and forall x (Brunette(x) -> Feculent(x)) -> therefore Feculent(barby) Feculent(barby) and Brunette(barby) and forall x (Feculent(x) and Brunette(x) -> Increasing(x)) -> therefore Increasing(barby) Increasing(barby) and Aquiferous(barby) and forall x (Increasing(x) and Aquiferous(x) -> Joking(x)) -> therefore Joking(barby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Florida is anamorphic. Florida is katabolic. Serene is maidenly. Serene is antimonial. Serene is katabolic. Walther is maidenly. Walther is katabolic. If someone is bruising and katabolic then they are anamorphic. Blue, maidenly people are footsore. White people are bruising. Serene is not footsore.", "logic": "\nAnamorphic(florida)\nKatabolic(florida)\nMaidenly(serene)\nAntimonial(serene)\nKatabolic(serene)\nMaidenly(walther)\nKatabolic(walther)\nforall x (Bruising(x) and Katabolic(x) -> Anamorphic(x))\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) and Maidenly(x) -> Footsore(x))\nforall x (Katabolic(x) -> Bruising(x))\n\nnot Footsore(serene)\n\nKatabolic(serene) and forall x (Katabolic(x) -> Bruising(x)) -> therefore Bruising(serene) Bruising(serene) and Katabolic(serene) and forall x (Bruising(x) and Katabolic(x) -> Anamorphic(x)) -> therefore Anamorphic(serene) Anamorphic(serene) and Maidenly(serene) and forall x (Anamorphic(x) and Maidenly(x) -> Footsore(x)) -> therefore Footsore(serene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Tybi is nonmusical. Tybi is fore. Arleen is adorable. Arleen is animated. Arleen is fore. Ruby is adorable. Ruby is fore. If someone is blamed and fore then they are nonmusical. Blue, adorable people are sarcosomal. White people are blamed. Tybi is not sarcosomal.", "logic": "\nNonmusical(tybi)\nFore(tybi)\nAdorable(arleen)\nAnimated(arleen)\nFore(arleen)\nAdorable(ruby)\nFore(ruby)\nforall x (Blamed(x) and Fore(x) -> Nonmusical(x))\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) and Adorable(x) -> Sarcosomal(x))\nforall x (Fore(x) -> Blamed(x))\n\nnot Sarcosomal(tybi)\n\nforall x (Nonmusical(x) and Adorable(x) -> Sarcosomal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Salomon is yeatsian. Salomon is debasing. Andriana is flaccid. Andriana is bombproof. Andriana is debasing. Berrie is flaccid. Berrie is debasing. If someone is brawny and debasing then they are yeatsian. Blue, flaccid people are armlike. White people are brawny. Berrie is rough.", "logic": "\nYeatsian(salomon)\nDebasing(salomon)\nFlaccid(andriana)\nBombproof(andriana)\nDebasing(andriana)\nFlaccid(berrie)\nDebasing(berrie)\nforall x (Brawny(x) and Debasing(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and Flaccid(x) -> Armlike(x))\nforall x (Debasing(x) -> Brawny(x))\n\nRough(berrie)\n\nRough(berrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Meggi is destroyed. Meggi is unadjusted. Penelope is delineate. Penelope is unhampered. Penelope is unadjusted. Zacharie is delineate. Zacharie is unadjusted. If someone is outdoorsy and unadjusted then they are destroyed. Blue, delineate people are social. White people are outdoorsy. Penelope is not rough.", "logic": "\nDestroyed(meggi)\nUnadjusted(meggi)\nDelineate(penelope)\nUnhampered(penelope)\nUnadjusted(penelope)\nDelineate(zacharie)\nUnadjusted(zacharie)\nforall x (Outdoorsy(x) and Unadjusted(x) -> Destroyed(x))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) and Delineate(x) -> Social(x))\nforall x (Unadjusted(x) -> Outdoorsy(x))\n\nnot Rough(penelope)\n\nnot Rough(penelope) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Gilles is pessimum. Gilles is numerous. Cher is freeborn. Cher is appetizing. Cher is numerous. Gerrit is freeborn. Gerrit is numerous. If someone is nonimmune and numerous then they are pessimum. Blue, freeborn people are definite. White people are nonimmune. Gilles is freeborn.", "logic": "\nPessimum(gilles)\nNumerous(gilles)\nFreeborn(cher)\nAppetizing(cher)\nNumerous(cher)\nFreeborn(gerrit)\nNumerous(gerrit)\nforall x (Nonimmune(x) and Numerous(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) and Freeborn(x) -> Definite(x))\nforall x (Numerous(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\n\nFreeborn(gilles)\n\nFreeborn(gilles) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Ailene is recreant. Ailene is accentual. Samaria is shakable. Samaria is xxviii. Samaria is accentual. Tymon is shakable. Tymon is accentual. If someone is grumose and accentual then they are recreant. Blue, shakable people are correlated. White people are grumose. Tymon is not xxviii.", "logic": "\nRecreant(ailene)\nAccentual(ailene)\nShakable(samaria)\nXxviii(samaria)\nAccentual(samaria)\nShakable(tymon)\nAccentual(tymon)\nforall x (Grumose(x) and Accentual(x) -> Recreant(x))\nforall x (Recreant(x) and Shakable(x) -> Correlated(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) -> Grumose(x))\n\nnot Xxviii(tymon)\n\nnot Xxviii(tymon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Caspar is nostalgic. Caspar is aplacental. Nan is flighted. Nan is falciform. Nan is aplacental. Wilek is flighted. Wilek is aplacental. If someone is convenient and aplacental then they are nostalgic. Blue, flighted people are isotropous. White people are convenient. Caspar is rough.", "logic": "\nNostalgic(caspar)\nAplacental(caspar)\nFlighted(nan)\nFalciform(nan)\nAplacental(nan)\nFlighted(wilek)\nAplacental(wilek)\nforall x (Convenient(x) and Aplacental(x) -> Nostalgic(x))\nforall x (Nostalgic(x) and Flighted(x) -> Isotropous(x))\nforall x (Aplacental(x) -> Convenient(x))\n\nRough(caspar)\n\nRough(caspar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-384"} {"premises": "Daryn is not starchlike. Renel is porcine. Renel is resurgent. Renel is not pompous. Renel is not starchlike. Renel is biaxate. Renel is wordless. Arleen is porcine. Arleen is resurgent. Arleen is not wanting. Arleen is starchlike. Arleen is biaxate. If something is starchlike then it is not wanting. All pompous things are not wordless. If something is resurgent then it is wordless. If Daryn is biaxate then Daryn is not wanting. If something is resurgent then it is biaxate. If Arleen is not biaxate then Arleen is porcine. If something is wanting and not wordless then it is porcine. All wanting, resurgent things are porcine. Renel is resurgent.", "logic": "\nnot Starchlike(daryn)\nPorcine(renel)\nResurgent(renel)\nnot Pompous(renel)\nnot Starchlike(renel)\nBiaxate(renel)\nWordless(renel)\nPorcine(arleen)\nResurgent(arleen)\nnot Wanting(arleen)\nStarchlike(arleen)\nBiaxate(arleen)\nforall x (Starchlike(x) -> not Wanting(x))\nforall x (Pompous(x) -> not Wordless(x))\nforall x (Resurgent(x) -> Wordless(x))\nBiaxate(daryn) -> not Wanting(daryn)\nforall x (Resurgent(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nnot Biaxate(arleen) -> Porcine(arleen)\nforall x (Wanting(x) and not Wordless(x) -> Porcine(x))\nforall x (Wanting(x) and Resurgent(x) -> Porcine(x))\n\nResurgent(renel)\n\ntherefore Resurgent(renel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Hodge is not enatic. Maxi is molecular. Maxi is troubled. Maxi is not scabrous. Maxi is not enatic. Maxi is haughty. Maxi is polite. Bealle is molecular. Bealle is troubled. Bealle is not hardy. Bealle is enatic. Bealle is haughty. If something is enatic then it is not hardy. All scabrous things are not polite. If something is troubled then it is polite. If Hodge is haughty then Hodge is not hardy. If something is troubled then it is haughty. If Bealle is not haughty then Bealle is molecular. If something is hardy and not polite then it is molecular. All hardy, troubled things are molecular. Hodge is enatic.", "logic": "\nnot Enatic(hodge)\nMolecular(maxi)\nTroubled(maxi)\nnot Scabrous(maxi)\nnot Enatic(maxi)\nHaughty(maxi)\nPolite(maxi)\nMolecular(bealle)\nTroubled(bealle)\nnot Hardy(bealle)\nEnatic(bealle)\nHaughty(bealle)\nforall x (Enatic(x) -> not Hardy(x))\nforall x (Scabrous(x) -> not Polite(x))\nforall x (Troubled(x) -> Polite(x))\nHaughty(hodge) -> not Hardy(hodge)\nforall x (Troubled(x) -> Haughty(x))\nnot Haughty(bealle) -> Molecular(bealle)\nforall x (Hardy(x) and not Polite(x) -> Molecular(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) and Troubled(x) -> Molecular(x))\n\nEnatic(hodge)\n\ntherefore not Enatic(hodge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Cammy is not entozoan. Claresta is vitreous. Claresta is boxlike. Claresta is not albinic. Claresta is not entozoan. Claresta is bavarian. Claresta is expectant. Nelli is vitreous. Nelli is boxlike. Nelli is not retral. Nelli is entozoan. Nelli is bavarian. If something is entozoan then it is not retral. All albinic things are not expectant. If something is boxlike then it is expectant. If Cammy is bavarian then Cammy is not retral. If something is boxlike then it is bavarian. If Nelli is not bavarian then Nelli is vitreous. If something is retral and not expectant then it is vitreous. All retral, boxlike things are vitreous. Nelli is expectant.", "logic": "\nnot Entozoan(cammy)\nVitreous(claresta)\nBoxlike(claresta)\nnot Albinic(claresta)\nnot Entozoan(claresta)\nBavarian(claresta)\nExpectant(claresta)\nVitreous(nelli)\nBoxlike(nelli)\nnot Retral(nelli)\nEntozoan(nelli)\nBavarian(nelli)\nforall x (Entozoan(x) -> not Retral(x))\nforall x (Albinic(x) -> not Expectant(x))\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Expectant(x))\nBavarian(cammy) -> not Retral(cammy)\nforall x (Boxlike(x) -> Bavarian(x))\nnot Bavarian(nelli) -> Vitreous(nelli)\nforall x (Retral(x) and not Expectant(x) -> Vitreous(x))\nforall x (Retral(x) and Boxlike(x) -> Vitreous(x))\n\nExpectant(nelli)\n\nBoxlike(nelli) and forall x (Boxlike(x) -> Expectant(x)) -> therefore Expectant(nelli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Marnia is not cheerless. Shirah is esteemed. Shirah is barbarian. Shirah is not biconvex. Shirah is not cheerless. Shirah is hysteric. Shirah is fogbound. Bren is esteemed. Bren is barbarian. Bren is not marshy. Bren is cheerless. Bren is hysteric. If something is cheerless then it is not marshy. All biconvex things are not fogbound. If something is barbarian then it is fogbound. If Marnia is hysteric then Marnia is not marshy. If something is barbarian then it is hysteric. If Bren is not hysteric then Bren is esteemed. If something is marshy and not fogbound then it is esteemed. All marshy, barbarian things are esteemed. Bren is not fogbound.", "logic": "\nnot Cheerless(marnia)\nEsteemed(shirah)\nBarbarian(shirah)\nnot Biconvex(shirah)\nnot Cheerless(shirah)\nHysteric(shirah)\nFogbound(shirah)\nEsteemed(bren)\nBarbarian(bren)\nnot Marshy(bren)\nCheerless(bren)\nHysteric(bren)\nforall x (Cheerless(x) -> not Marshy(x))\nforall x (Biconvex(x) -> not Fogbound(x))\nforall x (Barbarian(x) -> Fogbound(x))\nHysteric(marnia) -> not Marshy(marnia)\nforall x (Barbarian(x) -> Hysteric(x))\nnot Hysteric(bren) -> Esteemed(bren)\nforall x (Marshy(x) and not Fogbound(x) -> Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Marshy(x) and Barbarian(x) -> Esteemed(x))\n\nnot Fogbound(bren)\n\nBarbarian(bren) and forall x (Barbarian(x) -> Fogbound(x)) -> therefore Fogbound(bren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Idalia is not alight. Ralf is enjoyable. Ralf is sapless. Ralf is not cragged. Ralf is not alight. Ralf is untruthful. Ralf is studied. Rina is enjoyable. Rina is sapless. Rina is not winding. Rina is alight. Rina is untruthful. If something is alight then it is not winding. All cragged things are not studied. If something is sapless then it is studied. If Idalia is untruthful then Idalia is not winding. If something is sapless then it is untruthful. If Rina is not untruthful then Rina is enjoyable. If something is winding and not studied then it is enjoyable. All winding, sapless things are enjoyable. Idalia is not untruthful.", "logic": "\nnot Alight(idalia)\nEnjoyable(ralf)\nSapless(ralf)\nnot Cragged(ralf)\nnot Alight(ralf)\nUntruthful(ralf)\nStudied(ralf)\nEnjoyable(rina)\nSapless(rina)\nnot Winding(rina)\nAlight(rina)\nUntruthful(rina)\nforall x (Alight(x) -> not Winding(x))\nforall x (Cragged(x) -> not Studied(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Studied(x))\nUntruthful(idalia) -> not Winding(idalia)\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Untruthful(x))\nnot Untruthful(rina) -> Enjoyable(rina)\nforall x (Winding(x) and not Studied(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\nforall x (Winding(x) and Sapless(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\n\nnot Untruthful(idalia)\n\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Untruthful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Gomer is not lightless. Aili is placatory. Aili is ridiculous. Aili is not malted. Aili is not lightless. Aili is diocesan. Aili is lipophilic. Evangelin is placatory. Evangelin is ridiculous. Evangelin is not operating. Evangelin is lightless. Evangelin is diocesan. If something is lightless then it is not operating. All malted things are not lipophilic. If something is ridiculous then it is lipophilic. If Gomer is diocesan then Gomer is not operating. If something is ridiculous then it is diocesan. If Evangelin is not diocesan then Evangelin is placatory. If something is operating and not lipophilic then it is placatory. All operating, ridiculous things are placatory. Gomer is placatory.", "logic": "\nnot Lightless(gomer)\nPlacatory(aili)\nRidiculous(aili)\nnot Malted(aili)\nnot Lightless(aili)\nDiocesan(aili)\nLipophilic(aili)\nPlacatory(evangelin)\nRidiculous(evangelin)\nnot Operating(evangelin)\nLightless(evangelin)\nDiocesan(evangelin)\nforall x (Lightless(x) -> not Operating(x))\nforall x (Malted(x) -> not Lipophilic(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Lipophilic(x))\nDiocesan(gomer) -> not Operating(gomer)\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Diocesan(x))\nnot Diocesan(evangelin) -> Placatory(evangelin)\nforall x (Operating(x) and not Lipophilic(x) -> Placatory(x))\nforall x (Operating(x) and Ridiculous(x) -> Placatory(x))\n\nPlacatory(gomer)\n\nforall x (Operating(x) and not Lipophilic(x) -> Placatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Dov is not underslung. Sandor is meek. Sandor is dizzy. Sandor is not argentic. Sandor is not underslung. Sandor is secretive. Sandor is mysophobic. Shauna is meek. Shauna is dizzy. Shauna is not prenatal. Shauna is underslung. Shauna is secretive. If something is underslung then it is not prenatal. All argentic things are not mysophobic. If something is dizzy then it is mysophobic. If Dov is secretive then Dov is not prenatal. If something is dizzy then it is secretive. If Shauna is not secretive then Shauna is meek. If something is prenatal and not mysophobic then it is meek. All prenatal, dizzy things are meek. Dov is not argentic.", "logic": "\nnot Underslung(dov)\nMeek(sandor)\nDizzy(sandor)\nnot Argentic(sandor)\nnot Underslung(sandor)\nSecretive(sandor)\nMysophobic(sandor)\nMeek(shauna)\nDizzy(shauna)\nnot Prenatal(shauna)\nUnderslung(shauna)\nSecretive(shauna)\nforall x (Underslung(x) -> not Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Argentic(x) -> not Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Dizzy(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nSecretive(dov) -> not Prenatal(dov)\nforall x (Dizzy(x) -> Secretive(x))\nnot Secretive(shauna) -> Meek(shauna)\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and not Mysophobic(x) -> Meek(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and Dizzy(x) -> Meek(x))\n\nnot Argentic(dov)\n\nnot Argentic(dov) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Pansy is not fluent. Verney is specked. Verney is idle. Verney is not dissenting. Verney is not fluent. Verney is algonquian. Verney is hunted. Gerta is specked. Gerta is idle. Gerta is not pettish. Gerta is fluent. Gerta is algonquian. If something is fluent then it is not pettish. All dissenting things are not hunted. If something is idle then it is hunted. If Pansy is algonquian then Pansy is not pettish. If something is idle then it is algonquian. If Gerta is not algonquian then Gerta is specked. If something is pettish and not hunted then it is specked. All pettish, idle things are specked. Verney is pettish.", "logic": "\nnot Fluent(pansy)\nSpecked(verney)\nIdle(verney)\nnot Dissenting(verney)\nnot Fluent(verney)\nAlgonquian(verney)\nHunted(verney)\nSpecked(gerta)\nIdle(gerta)\nnot Pettish(gerta)\nFluent(gerta)\nAlgonquian(gerta)\nforall x (Fluent(x) -> not Pettish(x))\nforall x (Dissenting(x) -> not Hunted(x))\nforall x (Idle(x) -> Hunted(x))\nAlgonquian(pansy) -> not Pettish(pansy)\nforall x (Idle(x) -> Algonquian(x))\nnot Algonquian(gerta) -> Specked(gerta)\nforall x (Pettish(x) and not Hunted(x) -> Specked(x))\nforall x (Pettish(x) and Idle(x) -> Specked(x))\n\nPettish(verney)\n\nPettish(verney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1657"} {"premises": "Kiele is aphanitic. Leshia is towheaded. Leshia is rubber. Leshia is archaistic. Leshia is undressed. Leshia is bronchitic. Leshia is port. If someone is port and undressed then they are towheaded. If Leshia is aphanitic then Leshia is towheaded. If someone is port and bronchitic then they are aphanitic. Leshia is undressed.", "logic": "\nAphanitic(kiele)\nTowheaded(leshia)\nRubber(leshia)\nArchaistic(leshia)\nUndressed(leshia)\nBronchitic(leshia)\nPort(leshia)\nforall x (Port(x) and Undressed(x) -> Towheaded(x))\nAphanitic(leshia) -> Towheaded(leshia)\nforall x (Port(x) and Bronchitic(x) -> Aphanitic(x))\n\nUndressed(leshia)\n\ntherefore Undressed(leshia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3731"} {"premises": "Chandra is unstained. Gena is unamended. Gena is unavailing. Gena is unstudious. Gena is hewn. Gena is cultured. Gena is charged. If someone is charged and hewn then they are unamended. If Gena is unstained then Gena is unamended. If someone is charged and cultured then they are unstained. Gena is not charged.", "logic": "\nUnstained(chandra)\nUnamended(gena)\nUnavailing(gena)\nUnstudious(gena)\nHewn(gena)\nCultured(gena)\nCharged(gena)\nforall x (Charged(x) and Hewn(x) -> Unamended(x))\nUnstained(gena) -> Unamended(gena)\nforall x (Charged(x) and Cultured(x) -> Unstained(x))\n\nnot Charged(gena)\n\ntherefore Charged(gena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3731"} {"premises": "Chantalle is uncheerful. Drew is unspaced. Drew is bovine. Drew is makeshift. Drew is vivace. Drew is frightened. Drew is worshipful. If someone is worshipful and vivace then they are unspaced. If Drew is uncheerful then Drew is unspaced. If someone is worshipful and frightened then they are uncheerful. Chantalle is not unspaced.", "logic": "\nUncheerful(chantalle)\nUnspaced(drew)\nBovine(drew)\nMakeshift(drew)\nVivace(drew)\nFrightened(drew)\nWorshipful(drew)\nforall x (Worshipful(x) and Vivace(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nUncheerful(drew) -> Unspaced(drew)\nforall x (Worshipful(x) and Frightened(x) -> Uncheerful(x))\n\nnot Unspaced(chantalle)\n\nforall x (Worshipful(x) and Vivace(x) -> Unspaced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3731"} {"premises": "Daffi is stale. Siana is discarded. Siana is brainless. Siana is magic. Siana is lusty. Siana is acephalous. Siana is witting. If someone is witting and lusty then they are discarded. If Siana is stale then Siana is discarded. If someone is witting and acephalous then they are stale. Daffi is witting.", "logic": "\nStale(daffi)\nDiscarded(siana)\nBrainless(siana)\nMagic(siana)\nLusty(siana)\nAcephalous(siana)\nWitting(siana)\nforall x (Witting(x) and Lusty(x) -> Discarded(x))\nStale(siana) -> Discarded(siana)\nforall x (Witting(x) and Acephalous(x) -> Stale(x))\n\nWitting(daffi)\n\nWitting(daffi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3731"} {"premises": "The shamus whiff the hermy. The shamus is prudential. The shamus is unalloyed. The shamus is temporal. The shamus encircle the isaac. The shamus whelm the isaac. The tine encircle the shamus. The tine encircle the isaac. The tine whelm the shamus. The tine whelm the hermy. The isaac is temporal. The hermy whiff the shamus. The hermy whiff the isaac. The hermy is puffy. The hermy encircle the shamus. The hermy encircle the isaac. If something encircle the shamus then it whiff the isaac. If something whiff the shamus then it whiff the hermy. If something encircle the shamus and it whiff the hermy then the shamus encircle the tine. If something whelm the tine and the tine whiff the isaac then the isaac is unalloyed. If something is prudential and it encircle the tine then it whiff the shamus. If something whiff the shamus and it encircle the shamus then it whelm the isaac. The hermy whiff the isaac.", "logic": "\nWhiff(shamus, hermy)\nPrudential(shamus)\nUnalloyed(shamus)\nTemporal(shamus)\nEncircle(shamus, isaac)\nWhelm(shamus, isaac)\nEncircle(tine, shamus)\nEncircle(tine, isaac)\nWhelm(tine, shamus)\nWhelm(tine, hermy)\nTemporal(isaac)\nWhiff(hermy, shamus)\nWhiff(hermy, isaac)\nPuffy(hermy)\nEncircle(hermy, shamus)\nEncircle(hermy, isaac)\nforall x (Encircle(x, shamus) -> Whiff(x, isaac))\nforall x (Whiff(x, shamus) -> Whiff(x, hermy))\nforall x (Encircle(x, shamus) and Whiff(x, hermy) -> Encircle(shamus, tine))\nforall x (Whelm(x, tine) and Whiff(tine, isaac) -> Unalloyed(isaac))\nforall x (Prudential(x) and Encircle(x, tine) -> Whiff(x, shamus))\nforall x (Whiff(x, shamus) and Encircle(x, shamus) -> Whelm(x, isaac))\n\nWhiff(hermy, isaac)\n\ntherefore Whiff(hermy, isaac)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The horatius renew the pepe. The horatius is ternary. The horatius is reflective. The horatius is tongan. The horatius acquiesce the titus. The horatius casket the titus. The clerissa acquiesce the horatius. The clerissa acquiesce the titus. The clerissa casket the horatius. The clerissa casket the pepe. The titus is tongan. The pepe renew the horatius. The pepe renew the titus. The pepe is ternate. The pepe acquiesce the horatius. The pepe acquiesce the titus. If something acquiesce the horatius then it renew the titus. If something renew the horatius then it renew the pepe. If something acquiesce the horatius and it renew the pepe then the horatius acquiesce the clerissa. If something casket the clerissa and the clerissa renew the titus then the titus is reflective. If something is ternary and it acquiesce the clerissa then it renew the horatius. If something renew the horatius and it acquiesce the horatius then it casket the titus. The pepe does not like the horatius.", "logic": "\nRenew(horatius, pepe)\nTernary(horatius)\nReflective(horatius)\nTongan(horatius)\nAcquiesce(horatius, titus)\nCasket(horatius, titus)\nAcquiesce(clerissa, horatius)\nAcquiesce(clerissa, titus)\nCasket(clerissa, horatius)\nCasket(clerissa, pepe)\nTongan(titus)\nRenew(pepe, horatius)\nRenew(pepe, titus)\nTernate(pepe)\nAcquiesce(pepe, horatius)\nAcquiesce(pepe, titus)\nforall x (Acquiesce(x, horatius) -> Renew(x, titus))\nforall x (Renew(x, horatius) -> Renew(x, pepe))\nforall x (Acquiesce(x, horatius) and Renew(x, pepe) -> Acquiesce(horatius, clerissa))\nforall x (Casket(x, clerissa) and Renew(clerissa, titus) -> Reflective(titus))\nforall x (Ternary(x) and Acquiesce(x, clerissa) -> Renew(x, horatius))\nforall x (Renew(x, horatius) and Acquiesce(x, horatius) -> Casket(x, titus))\n\nnot Acquiesce(pepe, horatius)\n\ntherefore Acquiesce(pepe, horatius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The cammy crunch the magda. The cammy is urban. The cammy is unbeholden. The cammy is assuring. The cammy anger the glenn. The cammy grub the glenn. The othello anger the cammy. The othello anger the glenn. The othello grub the cammy. The othello grub the magda. The glenn is assuring. The magda crunch the cammy. The magda crunch the glenn. The magda is antitoxic. The magda anger the cammy. The magda anger the glenn. If something anger the cammy then it crunch the glenn. If something crunch the cammy then it crunch the magda. If something anger the cammy and it crunch the magda then the cammy anger the othello. If something grub the othello and the othello crunch the glenn then the glenn is unbeholden. If something is urban and it anger the othello then it crunch the cammy. If something crunch the cammy and it anger the cammy then it grub the glenn. The magda crunch the magda.", "logic": "\nCrunch(cammy, magda)\nUrban(cammy)\nUnbeholden(cammy)\nAssuring(cammy)\nAnger(cammy, glenn)\nGrub(cammy, glenn)\nAnger(othello, cammy)\nAnger(othello, glenn)\nGrub(othello, cammy)\nGrub(othello, magda)\nAssuring(glenn)\nCrunch(magda, cammy)\nCrunch(magda, glenn)\nAntitoxic(magda)\nAnger(magda, cammy)\nAnger(magda, glenn)\nforall x (Anger(x, cammy) -> Crunch(x, glenn))\nforall x (Crunch(x, cammy) -> Crunch(x, magda))\nforall x (Anger(x, cammy) and Crunch(x, magda) -> Anger(cammy, othello))\nforall x (Grub(x, othello) and Crunch(othello, glenn) -> Unbeholden(glenn))\nforall x (Urban(x) and Anger(x, othello) -> Crunch(x, cammy))\nforall x (Crunch(x, cammy) and Anger(x, cammy) -> Grub(x, glenn))\n\nCrunch(magda, magda)\n\nCrunch(magda, cammy) and forall x (Crunch(x, cammy) -> Crunch(x, magda)) -> therefore Crunch(magda, magda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The aurora unreel the tyrone. The aurora is empowered. The aurora is diverse. The aurora is credal. The aurora grow the maurise. The aurora mimic the maurise. The jarvis grow the aurora. The jarvis grow the maurise. The jarvis mimic the aurora. The jarvis mimic the tyrone. The maurise is credal. The tyrone unreel the aurora. The tyrone unreel the maurise. The tyrone is bimonthly. The tyrone grow the aurora. The tyrone grow the maurise. If something grow the aurora then it unreel the maurise. If something unreel the aurora then it unreel the tyrone. If something grow the aurora and it unreel the tyrone then the aurora grow the jarvis. If something mimic the jarvis and the jarvis unreel the maurise then the maurise is diverse. If something is empowered and it grow the jarvis then it unreel the aurora. If something unreel the aurora and it grow the aurora then it mimic the maurise. The jarvis does not eat the maurise.", "logic": "\nUnreel(aurora, tyrone)\nEmpowered(aurora)\nDiverse(aurora)\nCredal(aurora)\nGrow(aurora, maurise)\nMimic(aurora, maurise)\nGrow(jarvis, aurora)\nGrow(jarvis, maurise)\nMimic(jarvis, aurora)\nMimic(jarvis, tyrone)\nCredal(maurise)\nUnreel(tyrone, aurora)\nUnreel(tyrone, maurise)\nBimonthly(tyrone)\nGrow(tyrone, aurora)\nGrow(tyrone, maurise)\nforall x (Grow(x, aurora) -> Unreel(x, maurise))\nforall x (Unreel(x, aurora) -> Unreel(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Grow(x, aurora) and Unreel(x, tyrone) -> Grow(aurora, jarvis))\nforall x (Mimic(x, jarvis) and Unreel(jarvis, maurise) -> Diverse(maurise))\nforall x (Empowered(x) and Grow(x, jarvis) -> Unreel(x, aurora))\nforall x (Unreel(x, aurora) and Grow(x, aurora) -> Mimic(x, maurise))\n\nnot Unreel(jarvis, maurise)\n\nGrow(jarvis, aurora) and forall x (Grow(x, aurora) -> Unreel(x, maurise)) -> therefore Unreel(jarvis, maurise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The jed attend the henryetta. The jed is tubercular. The jed is brimless. The jed is balking. The jed outrival the robina. The jed motion the robina. The jonis outrival the jed. The jonis outrival the robina. The jonis motion the jed. The jonis motion the henryetta. The robina is balking. The henryetta attend the jed. The henryetta attend the robina. The henryetta is censorious. The henryetta outrival the jed. The henryetta outrival the robina. If something outrival the jed then it attend the robina. If something attend the jed then it attend the henryetta. If something outrival the jed and it attend the henryetta then the jed outrival the jonis. If something motion the jonis and the jonis attend the robina then the robina is brimless. If something is tubercular and it outrival the jonis then it attend the jed. If something attend the jed and it outrival the jed then it motion the robina. The jed outrival the jonis.", "logic": "\nAttend(jed, henryetta)\nTubercular(jed)\nBrimless(jed)\nBalking(jed)\nOutrival(jed, robina)\nMotion(jed, robina)\nOutrival(jonis, jed)\nOutrival(jonis, robina)\nMotion(jonis, jed)\nMotion(jonis, henryetta)\nBalking(robina)\nAttend(henryetta, jed)\nAttend(henryetta, robina)\nCensorious(henryetta)\nOutrival(henryetta, jed)\nOutrival(henryetta, robina)\nforall x (Outrival(x, jed) -> Attend(x, robina))\nforall x (Attend(x, jed) -> Attend(x, henryetta))\nforall x (Outrival(x, jed) and Attend(x, henryetta) -> Outrival(jed, jonis))\nforall x (Motion(x, jonis) and Attend(jonis, robina) -> Brimless(robina))\nforall x (Tubercular(x) and Outrival(x, jonis) -> Attend(x, jed))\nforall x (Attend(x, jed) and Outrival(x, jed) -> Motion(x, robina))\n\nOutrival(jed, jonis)\n\nAttend(henryetta, jed) and forall x (Attend(x, jed) -> Attend(x, henryetta)) -> therefore Attend(henryetta, henryetta) Outrival(henryetta, jed) and Attend(henryetta, henryetta) and forall x (Outrival(x, jed) and Attend(x, henryetta) -> Outrival(jed, jonis)) -> therefore Outrival(jed, jonis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The leoine adhere the corly. The leoine is royal. The leoine is relaxing. The leoine is avoidable. The leoine invalidate the cornellis. The leoine kowtow the cornellis. The muffin invalidate the leoine. The muffin invalidate the cornellis. The muffin kowtow the leoine. The muffin kowtow the corly. The cornellis is avoidable. The corly adhere the leoine. The corly adhere the cornellis. The corly is elongated. The corly invalidate the leoine. The corly invalidate the cornellis. If something invalidate the leoine then it adhere the cornellis. If something adhere the leoine then it adhere the corly. If something invalidate the leoine and it adhere the corly then the leoine invalidate the muffin. If something kowtow the muffin and the muffin adhere the cornellis then the cornellis is relaxing. If something is royal and it invalidate the muffin then it adhere the leoine. If something adhere the leoine and it invalidate the leoine then it kowtow the cornellis. The leoine does not like the muffin.", "logic": "\nAdhere(leoine, corly)\nRoyal(leoine)\nRelaxing(leoine)\nAvoidable(leoine)\nInvalidate(leoine, cornellis)\nKowtow(leoine, cornellis)\nInvalidate(muffin, leoine)\nInvalidate(muffin, cornellis)\nKowtow(muffin, leoine)\nKowtow(muffin, corly)\nAvoidable(cornellis)\nAdhere(corly, leoine)\nAdhere(corly, cornellis)\nElongated(corly)\nInvalidate(corly, leoine)\nInvalidate(corly, cornellis)\nforall x (Invalidate(x, leoine) -> Adhere(x, cornellis))\nforall x (Adhere(x, leoine) -> Adhere(x, corly))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, leoine) and Adhere(x, corly) -> Invalidate(leoine, muffin))\nforall x (Kowtow(x, muffin) and Adhere(muffin, cornellis) -> Relaxing(cornellis))\nforall x (Royal(x) and Invalidate(x, muffin) -> Adhere(x, leoine))\nforall x (Adhere(x, leoine) and Invalidate(x, leoine) -> Kowtow(x, cornellis))\n\nnot Invalidate(leoine, muffin)\n\nAdhere(corly, leoine) and forall x (Adhere(x, leoine) -> Adhere(x, corly)) -> therefore Adhere(corly, corly) Invalidate(corly, leoine) and Adhere(corly, corly) and forall x (Invalidate(x, leoine) and Adhere(x, corly) -> Invalidate(leoine, muffin)) -> therefore Invalidate(leoine, muffin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The mason seel the nollie. The mason is dominant. The mason is hypodermic. The mason is still. The mason birle the lawson. The mason doss the lawson. The latrena birle the mason. The latrena birle the lawson. The latrena doss the mason. The latrena doss the nollie. The lawson is still. The nollie seel the mason. The nollie seel the lawson. The nollie is irritable. The nollie birle the mason. The nollie birle the lawson. If something birle the mason then it seel the lawson. If something seel the mason then it seel the nollie. If something birle the mason and it seel the nollie then the mason birle the latrena. If something doss the latrena and the latrena seel the lawson then the lawson is hypodermic. If something is dominant and it birle the latrena then it seel the mason. If something seel the mason and it birle the mason then it doss the lawson. The mason seel the mason.", "logic": "\nSeel(mason, nollie)\nDominant(mason)\nHypodermic(mason)\nStill(mason)\nBirle(mason, lawson)\nDoss(mason, lawson)\nBirle(latrena, mason)\nBirle(latrena, lawson)\nDoss(latrena, mason)\nDoss(latrena, nollie)\nStill(lawson)\nSeel(nollie, mason)\nSeel(nollie, lawson)\nIrritable(nollie)\nBirle(nollie, mason)\nBirle(nollie, lawson)\nforall x (Birle(x, mason) -> Seel(x, lawson))\nforall x (Seel(x, mason) -> Seel(x, nollie))\nforall x (Birle(x, mason) and Seel(x, nollie) -> Birle(mason, latrena))\nforall x (Doss(x, latrena) and Seel(latrena, lawson) -> Hypodermic(lawson))\nforall x (Dominant(x) and Birle(x, latrena) -> Seel(x, mason))\nforall x (Seel(x, mason) and Birle(x, mason) -> Doss(x, lawson))\n\nSeel(mason, mason)\n\nSeel(nollie, mason) and forall x (Seel(x, mason) -> Seel(x, nollie)) -> therefore Seel(nollie, nollie) Birle(nollie, mason) and Seel(nollie, nollie) and forall x (Birle(x, mason) and Seel(x, nollie) -> Birle(mason, latrena)) -> therefore Birle(mason, latrena) Dominant(mason) and Birle(mason, latrena) and forall x (Dominant(x) and Birle(x, latrena) -> Seel(x, mason)) -> therefore Seel(mason, mason)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The henrik arrive the julieta. The henrik is unlicenced. The henrik is surgical. The henrik is xxiv. The henrik reave the erminie. The henrik spondaise the erminie. The siana reave the henrik. The siana reave the erminie. The siana spondaise the henrik. The siana spondaise the julieta. The erminie is xxiv. The julieta arrive the henrik. The julieta arrive the erminie. The julieta is augustan. The julieta reave the henrik. The julieta reave the erminie. If something reave the henrik then it arrive the erminie. If something arrive the henrik then it arrive the julieta. If something reave the henrik and it arrive the julieta then the henrik reave the siana. If something spondaise the siana and the siana arrive the erminie then the erminie is surgical. If something is unlicenced and it reave the siana then it arrive the henrik. If something arrive the henrik and it reave the henrik then it spondaise the erminie. The henrik does not eat the henrik.", "logic": "\nArrive(henrik, julieta)\nUnlicenced(henrik)\nSurgical(henrik)\nXxiv(henrik)\nReave(henrik, erminie)\nSpondaise(henrik, erminie)\nReave(siana, henrik)\nReave(siana, erminie)\nSpondaise(siana, henrik)\nSpondaise(siana, julieta)\nXxiv(erminie)\nArrive(julieta, henrik)\nArrive(julieta, erminie)\nAugustan(julieta)\nReave(julieta, henrik)\nReave(julieta, erminie)\nforall x (Reave(x, henrik) -> Arrive(x, erminie))\nforall x (Arrive(x, henrik) -> Arrive(x, julieta))\nforall x (Reave(x, henrik) and Arrive(x, julieta) -> Reave(henrik, siana))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, siana) and Arrive(siana, erminie) -> Surgical(erminie))\nforall x (Unlicenced(x) and Reave(x, siana) -> Arrive(x, henrik))\nforall x (Arrive(x, henrik) and Reave(x, henrik) -> Spondaise(x, erminie))\n\nnot Arrive(henrik, henrik)\n\nArrive(julieta, henrik) and forall x (Arrive(x, henrik) -> Arrive(x, julieta)) -> therefore Arrive(julieta, julieta) Reave(julieta, henrik) and Arrive(julieta, julieta) and forall x (Reave(x, henrik) and Arrive(x, julieta) -> Reave(henrik, siana)) -> therefore Reave(henrik, siana) Unlicenced(henrik) and Reave(henrik, siana) and forall x (Unlicenced(x) and Reave(x, siana) -> Arrive(x, henrik)) -> therefore Arrive(henrik, henrik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The mendel deliquesce the joni. The mendel is kooky. The mendel is resistant. The mendel is chaotic. The mendel enjoin the querida. The mendel zipper the querida. The audrye enjoin the mendel. The audrye enjoin the querida. The audrye zipper the mendel. The audrye zipper the joni. The querida is chaotic. The joni deliquesce the mendel. The joni deliquesce the querida. The joni is free. The joni enjoin the mendel. The joni enjoin the querida. If something enjoin the mendel then it deliquesce the querida. If something deliquesce the mendel then it deliquesce the joni. If something enjoin the mendel and it deliquesce the joni then the mendel enjoin the audrye. If something zipper the audrye and the audrye deliquesce the querida then the querida is resistant. If something is kooky and it enjoin the audrye then it deliquesce the mendel. If something deliquesce the mendel and it enjoin the mendel then it zipper the querida. The mendel does not eat the querida.", "logic": "\nDeliquesce(mendel, joni)\nKooky(mendel)\nResistant(mendel)\nChaotic(mendel)\nEnjoin(mendel, querida)\nZipper(mendel, querida)\nEnjoin(audrye, mendel)\nEnjoin(audrye, querida)\nZipper(audrye, mendel)\nZipper(audrye, joni)\nChaotic(querida)\nDeliquesce(joni, mendel)\nDeliquesce(joni, querida)\nFree(joni)\nEnjoin(joni, mendel)\nEnjoin(joni, querida)\nforall x (Enjoin(x, mendel) -> Deliquesce(x, querida))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, mendel) -> Deliquesce(x, joni))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, mendel) and Deliquesce(x, joni) -> Enjoin(mendel, audrye))\nforall x (Zipper(x, audrye) and Deliquesce(audrye, querida) -> Resistant(querida))\nforall x (Kooky(x) and Enjoin(x, audrye) -> Deliquesce(x, mendel))\nforall x (Deliquesce(x, mendel) and Enjoin(x, mendel) -> Zipper(x, querida))\n\nnot Deliquesce(mendel, querida)\n\nforall x (Enjoin(x, mendel) -> Deliquesce(x, querida)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The sharleen smooch the tedda. The sharleen is icky. The sharleen is sulky. The sharleen is nonsense. The sharleen mince the pru. The sharleen fantasize the pru. The elena mince the sharleen. The elena mince the pru. The elena fantasize the sharleen. The elena fantasize the tedda. The pru is nonsense. The tedda smooch the sharleen. The tedda smooch the pru. The tedda is acarpous. The tedda mince the sharleen. The tedda mince the pru. If something mince the sharleen then it smooch the pru. If something smooch the sharleen then it smooch the tedda. If something mince the sharleen and it smooch the tedda then the sharleen mince the elena. If something fantasize the elena and the elena smooch the pru then the pru is sulky. If something is icky and it mince the elena then it smooch the sharleen. If something smooch the sharleen and it mince the sharleen then it fantasize the pru. The elena smooch the tedda.", "logic": "\nSmooch(sharleen, tedda)\nIcky(sharleen)\nSulky(sharleen)\nNonsense(sharleen)\nMince(sharleen, pru)\nFantasize(sharleen, pru)\nMince(elena, sharleen)\nMince(elena, pru)\nFantasize(elena, sharleen)\nFantasize(elena, tedda)\nNonsense(pru)\nSmooch(tedda, sharleen)\nSmooch(tedda, pru)\nAcarpous(tedda)\nMince(tedda, sharleen)\nMince(tedda, pru)\nforall x (Mince(x, sharleen) -> Smooch(x, pru))\nforall x (Smooch(x, sharleen) -> Smooch(x, tedda))\nforall x (Mince(x, sharleen) and Smooch(x, tedda) -> Mince(sharleen, elena))\nforall x (Fantasize(x, elena) and Smooch(elena, pru) -> Sulky(pru))\nforall x (Icky(x) and Mince(x, elena) -> Smooch(x, sharleen))\nforall x (Smooch(x, sharleen) and Mince(x, sharleen) -> Fantasize(x, pru))\n\nSmooch(elena, tedda)\n\nforall x (Smooch(x, sharleen) -> Smooch(x, tedda)) <- forall x (Icky(x) and Mince(x, elena) -> Smooch(x, sharleen)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The candida tour the serene. The candida is monotypic. The candida is teeming. The candida is torulose. The candida pother the kessiah. The candida crisp the kessiah. The minnie pother the candida. The minnie pother the kessiah. The minnie crisp the candida. The minnie crisp the serene. The kessiah is torulose. The serene tour the candida. The serene tour the kessiah. The serene is needlelike. The serene pother the candida. The serene pother the kessiah. If something pother the candida then it tour the kessiah. If something tour the candida then it tour the serene. If something pother the candida and it tour the serene then the candida pother the minnie. If something crisp the minnie and the minnie tour the kessiah then the kessiah is teeming. If something is monotypic and it pother the minnie then it tour the candida. If something tour the candida and it pother the candida then it crisp the kessiah. The kessiah does not eat the kessiah.", "logic": "\nTour(candida, serene)\nMonotypic(candida)\nTeeming(candida)\nTorulose(candida)\nPother(candida, kessiah)\nCrisp(candida, kessiah)\nPother(minnie, candida)\nPother(minnie, kessiah)\nCrisp(minnie, candida)\nCrisp(minnie, serene)\nTorulose(kessiah)\nTour(serene, candida)\nTour(serene, kessiah)\nNeedlelike(serene)\nPother(serene, candida)\nPother(serene, kessiah)\nforall x (Pother(x, candida) -> Tour(x, kessiah))\nforall x (Tour(x, candida) -> Tour(x, serene))\nforall x (Pother(x, candida) and Tour(x, serene) -> Pother(candida, minnie))\nforall x (Crisp(x, minnie) and Tour(minnie, kessiah) -> Teeming(kessiah))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and Pother(x, minnie) -> Tour(x, candida))\nforall x (Tour(x, candida) and Pother(x, candida) -> Crisp(x, kessiah))\n\nnot Tour(kessiah, kessiah)\n\nforall x (Pother(x, candida) -> Tour(x, kessiah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The delia optimize the elene. The delia is planless. The delia is annoying. The delia is combinable. The delia mobilize the freddi. The delia beach the freddi. The karsten mobilize the delia. The karsten mobilize the freddi. The karsten beach the delia. The karsten beach the elene. The freddi is combinable. The elene optimize the delia. The elene optimize the freddi. The elene is unequaled. The elene mobilize the delia. The elene mobilize the freddi. If something mobilize the delia then it optimize the freddi. If something optimize the delia then it optimize the elene. If something mobilize the delia and it optimize the elene then the delia mobilize the karsten. If something beach the karsten and the karsten optimize the freddi then the freddi is annoying. If something is planless and it mobilize the karsten then it optimize the delia. If something optimize the delia and it mobilize the delia then it beach the freddi. The karsten optimize the delia.", "logic": "\nOptimize(delia, elene)\nPlanless(delia)\nAnnoying(delia)\nCombinable(delia)\nMobilize(delia, freddi)\nBeach(delia, freddi)\nMobilize(karsten, delia)\nMobilize(karsten, freddi)\nBeach(karsten, delia)\nBeach(karsten, elene)\nCombinable(freddi)\nOptimize(elene, delia)\nOptimize(elene, freddi)\nUnequaled(elene)\nMobilize(elene, delia)\nMobilize(elene, freddi)\nforall x (Mobilize(x, delia) -> Optimize(x, freddi))\nforall x (Optimize(x, delia) -> Optimize(x, elene))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, delia) and Optimize(x, elene) -> Mobilize(delia, karsten))\nforall x (Beach(x, karsten) and Optimize(karsten, freddi) -> Annoying(freddi))\nforall x (Planless(x) and Mobilize(x, karsten) -> Optimize(x, delia))\nforall x (Optimize(x, delia) and Mobilize(x, delia) -> Beach(x, freddi))\n\nOptimize(karsten, delia)\n\nforall x (Planless(x) and Mobilize(x, karsten) -> Optimize(x, delia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The giffer upholster the odilia. The giffer is unproven. The giffer is continent. The giffer is northeast. The giffer full the priscilla. The giffer ensile the priscilla. The donal full the giffer. The donal full the priscilla. The donal ensile the giffer. The donal ensile the odilia. The priscilla is northeast. The odilia upholster the giffer. The odilia upholster the priscilla. The odilia is jointed. The odilia full the giffer. The odilia full the priscilla. If something full the giffer then it upholster the priscilla. If something upholster the giffer then it upholster the odilia. If something full the giffer and it upholster the odilia then the giffer full the donal. If something ensile the donal and the donal upholster the priscilla then the priscilla is continent. If something is unproven and it full the donal then it upholster the giffer. If something upholster the giffer and it full the giffer then it ensile the priscilla. The odilia does not visit the giffer.", "logic": "\nUpholster(giffer, odilia)\nUnproven(giffer)\nContinent(giffer)\nNortheast(giffer)\nFull(giffer, priscilla)\nEnsile(giffer, priscilla)\nFull(donal, giffer)\nFull(donal, priscilla)\nEnsile(donal, giffer)\nEnsile(donal, odilia)\nNortheast(priscilla)\nUpholster(odilia, giffer)\nUpholster(odilia, priscilla)\nJointed(odilia)\nFull(odilia, giffer)\nFull(odilia, priscilla)\nforall x (Full(x, giffer) -> Upholster(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Upholster(x, giffer) -> Upholster(x, odilia))\nforall x (Full(x, giffer) and Upholster(x, odilia) -> Full(giffer, donal))\nforall x (Ensile(x, donal) and Upholster(donal, priscilla) -> Continent(priscilla))\nforall x (Unproven(x) and Full(x, donal) -> Upholster(x, giffer))\nforall x (Upholster(x, giffer) and Full(x, giffer) -> Ensile(x, priscilla))\n\nnot Ensile(odilia, giffer)\n\nnot Ensile(odilia, giffer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The quincey connect the ahmed. The quincey is paleozoic. The quincey is absent. The quincey is foldaway. The quincey landscape the helge. The quincey subjoin the helge. The tom landscape the quincey. The tom landscape the helge. The tom subjoin the quincey. The tom subjoin the ahmed. The helge is foldaway. The ahmed connect the quincey. The ahmed connect the helge. The ahmed is restive. The ahmed landscape the quincey. The ahmed landscape the helge. If something landscape the quincey then it connect the helge. If something connect the quincey then it connect the ahmed. If something landscape the quincey and it connect the ahmed then the quincey landscape the tom. If something subjoin the tom and the tom connect the helge then the helge is absent. If something is paleozoic and it landscape the tom then it connect the quincey. If something connect the quincey and it landscape the quincey then it subjoin the helge. The ahmed landscape the tom.", "logic": "\nConnect(quincey, ahmed)\nPaleozoic(quincey)\nAbsent(quincey)\nFoldaway(quincey)\nLandscape(quincey, helge)\nSubjoin(quincey, helge)\nLandscape(tom, quincey)\nLandscape(tom, helge)\nSubjoin(tom, quincey)\nSubjoin(tom, ahmed)\nFoldaway(helge)\nConnect(ahmed, quincey)\nConnect(ahmed, helge)\nRestive(ahmed)\nLandscape(ahmed, quincey)\nLandscape(ahmed, helge)\nforall x (Landscape(x, quincey) -> Connect(x, helge))\nforall x (Connect(x, quincey) -> Connect(x, ahmed))\nforall x (Landscape(x, quincey) and Connect(x, ahmed) -> Landscape(quincey, tom))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, tom) and Connect(tom, helge) -> Absent(helge))\nforall x (Paleozoic(x) and Landscape(x, tom) -> Connect(x, quincey))\nforall x (Connect(x, quincey) and Landscape(x, quincey) -> Subjoin(x, helge))\n\nLandscape(ahmed, tom)\n\nLandscape(ahmed, tom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The corby persevere the fazeel. The corby is strapping. The corby is boyish. The corby is pinstriped. The corby craze the arline. The corby disagree the arline. The collin craze the corby. The collin craze the arline. The collin disagree the corby. The collin disagree the fazeel. The arline is pinstriped. The fazeel persevere the corby. The fazeel persevere the arline. The fazeel is sunlit. The fazeel craze the corby. The fazeel craze the arline. If something craze the corby then it persevere the arline. If something persevere the corby then it persevere the fazeel. If something craze the corby and it persevere the fazeel then the corby craze the collin. If something disagree the collin and the collin persevere the arline then the arline is boyish. If something is strapping and it craze the collin then it persevere the corby. If something persevere the corby and it craze the corby then it disagree the arline. The collin does not like the collin.", "logic": "\nPersevere(corby, fazeel)\nStrapping(corby)\nBoyish(corby)\nPinstriped(corby)\nCraze(corby, arline)\nDisagree(corby, arline)\nCraze(collin, corby)\nCraze(collin, arline)\nDisagree(collin, corby)\nDisagree(collin, fazeel)\nPinstriped(arline)\nPersevere(fazeel, corby)\nPersevere(fazeel, arline)\nSunlit(fazeel)\nCraze(fazeel, corby)\nCraze(fazeel, arline)\nforall x (Craze(x, corby) -> Persevere(x, arline))\nforall x (Persevere(x, corby) -> Persevere(x, fazeel))\nforall x (Craze(x, corby) and Persevere(x, fazeel) -> Craze(corby, collin))\nforall x (Disagree(x, collin) and Persevere(collin, arline) -> Boyish(arline))\nforall x (Strapping(x) and Craze(x, collin) -> Persevere(x, corby))\nforall x (Persevere(x, corby) and Craze(x, corby) -> Disagree(x, arline))\n\nnot Craze(collin, collin)\n\nnot Craze(collin, collin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "The madonna topple the milo. The madonna is holophytic. The madonna is favorite. The madonna is hewn. The madonna lapidate the verina. The madonna dimple the verina. The florie lapidate the madonna. The florie lapidate the verina. The florie dimple the madonna. The florie dimple the milo. The verina is hewn. The milo topple the madonna. The milo topple the verina. The milo is bowfront. The milo lapidate the madonna. The milo lapidate the verina. If something lapidate the madonna then it topple the verina. If something topple the madonna then it topple the milo. If something lapidate the madonna and it topple the milo then the madonna lapidate the florie. If something dimple the florie and the florie topple the verina then the verina is favorite. If something is holophytic and it lapidate the florie then it topple the madonna. If something topple the madonna and it lapidate the madonna then it dimple the verina. The verina dimple the milo.", "logic": "\nTopple(madonna, milo)\nHolophytic(madonna)\nFavorite(madonna)\nHewn(madonna)\nLapidate(madonna, verina)\nDimple(madonna, verina)\nLapidate(florie, madonna)\nLapidate(florie, verina)\nDimple(florie, madonna)\nDimple(florie, milo)\nHewn(verina)\nTopple(milo, madonna)\nTopple(milo, verina)\nBowfront(milo)\nLapidate(milo, madonna)\nLapidate(milo, verina)\nforall x (Lapidate(x, madonna) -> Topple(x, verina))\nforall x (Topple(x, madonna) -> Topple(x, milo))\nforall x (Lapidate(x, madonna) and Topple(x, milo) -> Lapidate(madonna, florie))\nforall x (Dimple(x, florie) and Topple(florie, verina) -> Favorite(verina))\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Lapidate(x, florie) -> Topple(x, madonna))\nforall x (Topple(x, madonna) and Lapidate(x, madonna) -> Dimple(x, verina))\n\nDimple(verina, milo)\n\nDimple(verina, milo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-665"} {"premises": "Florrie is unbarreled. Florrie is polluted. Florrie is unprepared. Florrie is biased. Chauncey is polluted. Chauncey is bordered. Chauncey is unprepared. All unbarreled, bordered things are graspable. If Chauncey is polluted and Chauncey is bordered then Chauncey is unbarreled. Florrie is unprepared.", "logic": "\nUnbarreled(florrie)\nPolluted(florrie)\nUnprepared(florrie)\nBiased(florrie)\nPolluted(chauncey)\nBordered(chauncey)\nUnprepared(chauncey)\nforall x (Unbarreled(x) and Bordered(x) -> Graspable(x))\nPolluted(chauncey) and Bordered(chauncey) -> Unbarreled(chauncey)\n\nUnprepared(florrie)\n\ntherefore Unprepared(florrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Doll is genteel. Doll is crocked. Doll is saurian. Doll is coinciding. Fons is crocked. Fons is psychic. Fons is saurian. All genteel, psychic things are bismuthic. If Fons is crocked and Fons is psychic then Fons is genteel. Doll is not saurian.", "logic": "\nGenteel(doll)\nCrocked(doll)\nSaurian(doll)\nCoinciding(doll)\nCrocked(fons)\nPsychic(fons)\nSaurian(fons)\nforall x (Genteel(x) and Psychic(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nCrocked(fons) and Psychic(fons) -> Genteel(fons)\n\nnot Saurian(doll)\n\ntherefore Saurian(doll)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Timothy is astral. Timothy is mutilated. Timothy is blushful. Timothy is churchly. Retha is mutilated. Retha is wide. Retha is blushful. All astral, wide things are autotypic. If Retha is mutilated and Retha is wide then Retha is astral. Retha is astral.", "logic": "\nAstral(timothy)\nMutilated(timothy)\nBlushful(timothy)\nChurchly(timothy)\nMutilated(retha)\nWide(retha)\nBlushful(retha)\nforall x (Astral(x) and Wide(x) -> Autotypic(x))\nMutilated(retha) and Wide(retha) -> Astral(retha)\n\nAstral(retha)\n\nMutilated(retha) and Wide(retha) and Mutilated(retha) and Wide(retha) -> Astral(retha) -> therefore Astral(retha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Ruthanne is erasmian. Ruthanne is carbonylic. Ruthanne is cyanogenic. Ruthanne is cloze. Corella is carbonylic. Corella is plumose. Corella is cyanogenic. All erasmian, plumose things are blasting. If Corella is carbonylic and Corella is plumose then Corella is erasmian. Corella is not erasmian.", "logic": "\nErasmian(ruthanne)\nCarbonylic(ruthanne)\nCyanogenic(ruthanne)\nCloze(ruthanne)\nCarbonylic(corella)\nPlumose(corella)\nCyanogenic(corella)\nforall x (Erasmian(x) and Plumose(x) -> Blasting(x))\nCarbonylic(corella) and Plumose(corella) -> Erasmian(corella)\n\nnot Erasmian(corella)\n\nCarbonylic(corella) and Plumose(corella) and Carbonylic(corella) and Plumose(corella) -> Erasmian(corella) -> therefore Erasmian(corella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Sylvan is birken. Sylvan is twilit. Sylvan is decisive. Sylvan is overbold. Zebadiah is twilit. Zebadiah is bicameral. Zebadiah is decisive. All birken, bicameral things are doleful. If Zebadiah is twilit and Zebadiah is bicameral then Zebadiah is birken. Zebadiah is doleful.", "logic": "\nBirken(sylvan)\nTwilit(sylvan)\nDecisive(sylvan)\nOverbold(sylvan)\nTwilit(zebadiah)\nBicameral(zebadiah)\nDecisive(zebadiah)\nforall x (Birken(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Doleful(x))\nTwilit(zebadiah) and Bicameral(zebadiah) -> Birken(zebadiah)\n\nDoleful(zebadiah)\n\nTwilit(zebadiah) and Bicameral(zebadiah) and Twilit(zebadiah) and Bicameral(zebadiah) -> Birken(zebadiah) -> therefore Birken(zebadiah) Birken(zebadiah) and Bicameral(zebadiah) and forall x (Birken(x) and Bicameral(x) -> Doleful(x)) -> therefore Doleful(zebadiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Isabella is pyrogallic. Isabella is plumlike. Isabella is sour. Isabella is cellulosid. Tobias is plumlike. Tobias is crapulent. Tobias is sour. All pyrogallic, crapulent things are skimmed. If Tobias is plumlike and Tobias is crapulent then Tobias is pyrogallic. Tobias is not skimmed.", "logic": "\nPyrogallic(isabella)\nPlumlike(isabella)\nSour(isabella)\nCellulosid(isabella)\nPlumlike(tobias)\nCrapulent(tobias)\nSour(tobias)\nforall x (Pyrogallic(x) and Crapulent(x) -> Skimmed(x))\nPlumlike(tobias) and Crapulent(tobias) -> Pyrogallic(tobias)\n\nnot Skimmed(tobias)\n\nPlumlike(tobias) and Crapulent(tobias) and Plumlike(tobias) and Crapulent(tobias) -> Pyrogallic(tobias) -> therefore Pyrogallic(tobias) Pyrogallic(tobias) and Crapulent(tobias) and forall x (Pyrogallic(x) and Crapulent(x) -> Skimmed(x)) -> therefore Skimmed(tobias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Nana is arty. Nana is matted. Nana is trimmed. Nana is unfilled. Casandra is matted. Casandra is merged. Casandra is trimmed. All arty, merged things are aeriform. If Casandra is matted and Casandra is merged then Casandra is arty. Nana is not aeriform.", "logic": "\nArty(nana)\nMatted(nana)\nTrimmed(nana)\nUnfilled(nana)\nMatted(casandra)\nMerged(casandra)\nTrimmed(casandra)\nforall x (Arty(x) and Merged(x) -> Aeriform(x))\nMatted(casandra) and Merged(casandra) -> Arty(casandra)\n\nnot Aeriform(nana)\n\nforall x (Arty(x) and Merged(x) -> Aeriform(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Dulcinea is delayed. Dulcinea is axenic. Dulcinea is foppish. Dulcinea is moated. Glen is axenic. Glen is spellbound. Glen is foppish. All delayed, spellbound things are marvelous. If Glen is axenic and Glen is spellbound then Glen is delayed. Dulcinea is blue.", "logic": "\nDelayed(dulcinea)\nAxenic(dulcinea)\nFoppish(dulcinea)\nMoated(dulcinea)\nAxenic(glen)\nSpellbound(glen)\nFoppish(glen)\nforall x (Delayed(x) and Spellbound(x) -> Marvelous(x))\nAxenic(glen) and Spellbound(glen) -> Delayed(glen)\n\nBlue(dulcinea)\n\nBlue(dulcinea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Avrom is mired. Avrom is adjacent. Avrom is acroscopic. Avrom is elysian. Piet is adjacent. Piet is pneumonic. Piet is acroscopic. All mired, pneumonic things are tranquil. If Piet is adjacent and Piet is pneumonic then Piet is mired. Avrom is not pneumonic.", "logic": "\nMired(avrom)\nAdjacent(avrom)\nAcroscopic(avrom)\nElysian(avrom)\nAdjacent(piet)\nPneumonic(piet)\nAcroscopic(piet)\nforall x (Mired(x) and Pneumonic(x) -> Tranquil(x))\nAdjacent(piet) and Pneumonic(piet) -> Mired(piet)\n\nnot Pneumonic(avrom)\n\nnot Pneumonic(avrom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Skip is subocular. Skip is jamesian. Skip is unclipped. Skip is ecumenical. Shamus is jamesian. Shamus is debasing. Shamus is unclipped. All subocular, debasing things are accoutred. If Shamus is jamesian and Shamus is debasing then Shamus is subocular. Shamus is blue.", "logic": "\nSubocular(skip)\nJamesian(skip)\nUnclipped(skip)\nEcumenical(skip)\nJamesian(shamus)\nDebasing(shamus)\nUnclipped(shamus)\nforall x (Subocular(x) and Debasing(x) -> Accoutred(x))\nJamesian(shamus) and Debasing(shamus) -> Subocular(shamus)\n\nBlue(shamus)\n\nBlue(shamus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1463"} {"premises": "Viviana is hesperian. Roanne is resident. All acetous, hesperian people are snuggled. If someone is snuggled and terrific then they are haggard. If Roanne is acetous then Roanne is hesperian. If someone is resident then they are snuggled. All snuggled, resident people are acetous. All terrific, acetous people are resident. Roanne is resident.", "logic": "\nHesperian(viviana)\nResident(roanne)\nforall x (Acetous(x) and Hesperian(x) -> Snuggled(x))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) and Terrific(x) -> Haggard(x))\nAcetous(roanne) -> Hesperian(roanne)\nforall x (Resident(x) -> Snuggled(x))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) and Resident(x) -> Acetous(x))\nforall x (Terrific(x) and Acetous(x) -> Resident(x))\n\nResident(roanne)\n\ntherefore Resident(roanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Malcolm is amphoric. Ebonee is solo. All downtown, amphoric people are ephemeral. If someone is ephemeral and true then they are scholastic. If Ebonee is downtown then Ebonee is amphoric. If someone is solo then they are ephemeral. All ephemeral, solo people are downtown. All true, downtown people are solo. Ebonee is not solo.", "logic": "\nAmphoric(malcolm)\nSolo(ebonee)\nforall x (Downtown(x) and Amphoric(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and True(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nDowntown(ebonee) -> Amphoric(ebonee)\nforall x (Solo(x) -> Ephemeral(x))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) and Solo(x) -> Downtown(x))\nforall x (True(x) and Downtown(x) -> Solo(x))\n\nnot Solo(ebonee)\n\ntherefore Solo(ebonee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Alia is leonine. Elliot is thundery. All dour, leonine people are bypast. If someone is bypast and ingrown then they are promissory. If Elliot is dour then Elliot is leonine. If someone is thundery then they are bypast. All bypast, thundery people are dour. All ingrown, dour people are thundery. Elliot is bypast.", "logic": "\nLeonine(alia)\nThundery(elliot)\nforall x (Dour(x) and Leonine(x) -> Bypast(x))\nforall x (Bypast(x) and Ingrown(x) -> Promissory(x))\nDour(elliot) -> Leonine(elliot)\nforall x (Thundery(x) -> Bypast(x))\nforall x (Bypast(x) and Thundery(x) -> Dour(x))\nforall x (Ingrown(x) and Dour(x) -> Thundery(x))\n\nBypast(elliot)\n\nThundery(elliot) and forall x (Thundery(x) -> Bypast(x)) -> therefore Bypast(elliot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Ashby is unshared. Elga is bust. All anuran, unshared people are piquant. If someone is piquant and decadent then they are jesuitical. If Elga is anuran then Elga is unshared. If someone is bust then they are piquant. All piquant, bust people are anuran. All decadent, anuran people are bust. Elga is not piquant.", "logic": "\nUnshared(ashby)\nBust(elga)\nforall x (Anuran(x) and Unshared(x) -> Piquant(x))\nforall x (Piquant(x) and Decadent(x) -> Jesuitical(x))\nAnuran(elga) -> Unshared(elga)\nforall x (Bust(x) -> Piquant(x))\nforall x (Piquant(x) and Bust(x) -> Anuran(x))\nforall x (Decadent(x) and Anuran(x) -> Bust(x))\n\nnot Piquant(elga)\n\nBust(elga) and forall x (Bust(x) -> Piquant(x)) -> therefore Piquant(elga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Meir is flowerless. Willetta is floating. All qatari, flowerless people are astral. If someone is astral and fastidious then they are spinous. If Willetta is qatari then Willetta is flowerless. If someone is floating then they are astral. All astral, floating people are qatari. All fastidious, qatari people are floating. Willetta is qatari.", "logic": "\nFlowerless(meir)\nFloating(willetta)\nforall x (Qatari(x) and Flowerless(x) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Fastidious(x) -> Spinous(x))\nQatari(willetta) -> Flowerless(willetta)\nforall x (Floating(x) -> Astral(x))\nforall x (Astral(x) and Floating(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Fastidious(x) and Qatari(x) -> Floating(x))\n\nQatari(willetta)\n\nFloating(willetta) and forall x (Floating(x) -> Astral(x)) -> therefore Astral(willetta) Astral(willetta) and Floating(willetta) and forall x (Astral(x) and Floating(x) -> Qatari(x)) -> therefore Qatari(willetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Tate is dantean. Austina is telltale. All vengeful, dantean people are agnostical. If someone is agnostical and florentine then they are acceptive. If Austina is vengeful then Austina is dantean. If someone is telltale then they are agnostical. All agnostical, telltale people are vengeful. All florentine, vengeful people are telltale. Austina is not vengeful.", "logic": "\nDantean(tate)\nTelltale(austina)\nforall x (Vengeful(x) and Dantean(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and Florentine(x) -> Acceptive(x))\nVengeful(austina) -> Dantean(austina)\nforall x (Telltale(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) and Telltale(x) -> Vengeful(x))\nforall x (Florentine(x) and Vengeful(x) -> Telltale(x))\n\nnot Vengeful(austina)\n\nTelltale(austina) and forall x (Telltale(x) -> Agnostical(x)) -> therefore Agnostical(austina) Agnostical(austina) and Telltale(austina) and forall x (Agnostical(x) and Telltale(x) -> Vengeful(x)) -> therefore Vengeful(austina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Mandi is beneficial. Debera is inaugural. All toupeed, beneficial people are septicemic. If someone is septicemic and cosmetic then they are regal. If Debera is toupeed then Debera is beneficial. If someone is inaugural then they are septicemic. All septicemic, inaugural people are toupeed. All cosmetic, toupeed people are inaugural. Debera is beneficial.", "logic": "\nBeneficial(mandi)\nInaugural(debera)\nforall x (Toupeed(x) and Beneficial(x) -> Septicemic(x))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> Regal(x))\nToupeed(debera) -> Beneficial(debera)\nforall x (Inaugural(x) -> Septicemic(x))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) and Inaugural(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) and Toupeed(x) -> Inaugural(x))\n\nBeneficial(debera)\n\nInaugural(debera) and forall x (Inaugural(x) -> Septicemic(x)) -> therefore Septicemic(debera) Septicemic(debera) and Inaugural(debera) and forall x (Septicemic(x) and Inaugural(x) -> Toupeed(x)) -> therefore Toupeed(debera) Toupeed(debera) and Toupeed(debera) -> Beneficial(debera) -> therefore Beneficial(debera)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Janeta is straggling. Desiri is disunited. All tractile, straggling people are maleficent. If someone is maleficent and sixteen then they are landed. If Desiri is tractile then Desiri is straggling. If someone is disunited then they are maleficent. All maleficent, disunited people are tractile. All sixteen, tractile people are disunited. Desiri is not straggling.", "logic": "\nStraggling(janeta)\nDisunited(desiri)\nforall x (Tractile(x) and Straggling(x) -> Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Maleficent(x) and Sixteen(x) -> Landed(x))\nTractile(desiri) -> Straggling(desiri)\nforall x (Disunited(x) -> Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Maleficent(x) and Disunited(x) -> Tractile(x))\nforall x (Sixteen(x) and Tractile(x) -> Disunited(x))\n\nnot Straggling(desiri)\n\nDisunited(desiri) and forall x (Disunited(x) -> Maleficent(x)) -> therefore Maleficent(desiri) Maleficent(desiri) and Disunited(desiri) and forall x (Maleficent(x) and Disunited(x) -> Tractile(x)) -> therefore Tractile(desiri) Tractile(desiri) and Tractile(desiri) -> Straggling(desiri) -> therefore Straggling(desiri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Jeannette is falciform. Glenine is germane. All defective, falciform people are staunch. If someone is staunch and inferior then they are carmelite. If Glenine is defective then Glenine is falciform. If someone is germane then they are staunch. All staunch, germane people are defective. All inferior, defective people are germane. Glenine is not carmelite.", "logic": "\nFalciform(jeannette)\nGermane(glenine)\nforall x (Defective(x) and Falciform(x) -> Staunch(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Inferior(x) -> Carmelite(x))\nDefective(glenine) -> Falciform(glenine)\nforall x (Germane(x) -> Staunch(x))\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Germane(x) -> Defective(x))\nforall x (Inferior(x) and Defective(x) -> Germane(x))\n\nnot Carmelite(glenine)\n\nforall x (Staunch(x) and Inferior(x) -> Carmelite(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Natalie is unfertile. Vasilis is agonizing. All omissive, unfertile people are goodly. If someone is goodly and unpressed then they are untellable. If Vasilis is omissive then Vasilis is unfertile. If someone is agonizing then they are goodly. All goodly, agonizing people are omissive. All unpressed, omissive people are agonizing. Natalie is untellable.", "logic": "\nUnfertile(natalie)\nAgonizing(vasilis)\nforall x (Omissive(x) and Unfertile(x) -> Goodly(x))\nforall x (Goodly(x) and Unpressed(x) -> Untellable(x))\nOmissive(vasilis) -> Unfertile(vasilis)\nforall x (Agonizing(x) -> Goodly(x))\nforall x (Goodly(x) and Agonizing(x) -> Omissive(x))\nforall x (Unpressed(x) and Omissive(x) -> Agonizing(x))\n\nUntellable(natalie)\n\nforall x (Goodly(x) and Unpressed(x) -> Untellable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Elie is downwind. Blinnie is polysemous. All realizable, downwind people are tweedy. If someone is tweedy and gushy then they are loco. If Blinnie is realizable then Blinnie is downwind. If someone is polysemous then they are tweedy. All tweedy, polysemous people are realizable. All gushy, realizable people are polysemous. Elie is not polysemous.", "logic": "\nDownwind(elie)\nPolysemous(blinnie)\nforall x (Realizable(x) and Downwind(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Gushy(x) -> Loco(x))\nRealizable(blinnie) -> Downwind(blinnie)\nforall x (Polysemous(x) -> Tweedy(x))\nforall x (Tweedy(x) and Polysemous(x) -> Realizable(x))\nforall x (Gushy(x) and Realizable(x) -> Polysemous(x))\n\nnot Polysemous(elie)\n\nforall x (Gushy(x) and Realizable(x) -> Polysemous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Lanny is oversized. Waiter is suitable. All croaky, oversized people are clerical. If someone is clerical and sublunary then they are meritless. If Waiter is croaky then Waiter is oversized. If someone is suitable then they are clerical. All clerical, suitable people are croaky. All sublunary, croaky people are suitable. Lanny is clerical.", "logic": "\nOversized(lanny)\nSuitable(waiter)\nforall x (Croaky(x) and Oversized(x) -> Clerical(x))\nforall x (Clerical(x) and Sublunary(x) -> Meritless(x))\nCroaky(waiter) -> Oversized(waiter)\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Clerical(x))\nforall x (Clerical(x) and Suitable(x) -> Croaky(x))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) and Croaky(x) -> Suitable(x))\n\nClerical(lanny)\n\nforall x (Croaky(x) and Oversized(x) -> Clerical(x)) <- forall x (Clerical(x) and Suitable(x) -> Croaky(x)) <- forall x (Sublunary(x) and Croaky(x) -> Suitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Kylen is rotatory. Darcy is bigmouthed. All unspotted, rotatory people are banned. If someone is banned and hardheaded then they are alchemical. If Darcy is unspotted then Darcy is rotatory. If someone is bigmouthed then they are banned. All banned, bigmouthed people are unspotted. All hardheaded, unspotted people are bigmouthed. Darcy is not hardheaded.", "logic": "\nRotatory(kylen)\nBigmouthed(darcy)\nforall x (Unspotted(x) and Rotatory(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) and Hardheaded(x) -> Alchemical(x))\nUnspotted(darcy) -> Rotatory(darcy)\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Banned(x) and Bigmouthed(x) -> Unspotted(x))\nforall x (Hardheaded(x) and Unspotted(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\n\nnot Hardheaded(darcy)\n\nnot Hardheaded(darcy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Madlen is dizygotic. Thurston is french. All dustlike, dizygotic people are uncolored. If someone is uncolored and despicable then they are crazy. If Thurston is dustlike then Thurston is dizygotic. If someone is french then they are uncolored. All uncolored, french people are dustlike. All despicable, dustlike people are french. Madlen is furry.", "logic": "\nDizygotic(madlen)\nFrench(thurston)\nforall x (Dustlike(x) and Dizygotic(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and Despicable(x) -> Crazy(x))\nDustlike(thurston) -> Dizygotic(thurston)\nforall x (French(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) and French(x) -> Dustlike(x))\nforall x (Despicable(x) and Dustlike(x) -> French(x))\n\nFurry(madlen)\n\nFurry(madlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Katharyn is perceptive. Lidia is adulterate. All hoary, perceptive people are splendid. If someone is splendid and catechetic then they are cyanogenic. If Lidia is hoary then Lidia is perceptive. If someone is adulterate then they are splendid. All splendid, adulterate people are hoary. All catechetic, hoary people are adulterate. Lidia is not furry.", "logic": "\nPerceptive(katharyn)\nAdulterate(lidia)\nforall x (Hoary(x) and Perceptive(x) -> Splendid(x))\nforall x (Splendid(x) and Catechetic(x) -> Cyanogenic(x))\nHoary(lidia) -> Perceptive(lidia)\nforall x (Adulterate(x) -> Splendid(x))\nforall x (Splendid(x) and Adulterate(x) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Catechetic(x) and Hoary(x) -> Adulterate(x))\n\nnot Furry(lidia)\n\nnot Furry(lidia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Desmond is regulated. Whitney is zapotec. All overlying, regulated people are boring. If someone is boring and preferent then they are hottish. If Whitney is overlying then Whitney is regulated. If someone is zapotec then they are boring. All boring, zapotec people are overlying. All preferent, overlying people are zapotec. Desmond is preferent.", "logic": "\nRegulated(desmond)\nZapotec(whitney)\nforall x (Overlying(x) and Regulated(x) -> Boring(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) and Preferent(x) -> Hottish(x))\nOverlying(whitney) -> Regulated(whitney)\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Boring(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) and Zapotec(x) -> Overlying(x))\nforall x (Preferent(x) and Overlying(x) -> Zapotec(x))\n\nPreferent(desmond)\n\nPreferent(desmond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-694"} {"premises": "Northrop is inactive. Northrop is forcible. Northrop is positive. Hephzibah is inactive. Hephzibah is inspired. Hephzibah is hick. Hephzibah is fanciful. Hephzibah is forcible. Hephzibah is positive. Hephzibah is cosmetic. Maire is forcible. Maire is cosmetic. All forcible, fanciful people are cosmetic. Round people are hick. Green people are cosmetic. Quiet, fanciful people are cosmetic. If someone is forcible and inactive then they are inspired. Round, cosmetic people are fanciful. Hephzibah is cosmetic.", "logic": "\nInactive(northrop)\nForcible(northrop)\nPositive(northrop)\nInactive(hephzibah)\nInspired(hephzibah)\nHick(hephzibah)\nFanciful(hephzibah)\nForcible(hephzibah)\nPositive(hephzibah)\nCosmetic(hephzibah)\nForcible(maire)\nCosmetic(maire)\nforall x (Forcible(x) and Fanciful(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Positive(x) -> Hick(x))\nforall x (Hick(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Forcible(x) and Fanciful(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Forcible(x) and Inactive(x) -> Inspired(x))\nforall x (Positive(x) and Cosmetic(x) -> Fanciful(x))\n\nCosmetic(hephzibah)\n\ntherefore Cosmetic(hephzibah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Patience is deciding. Patience is canonised. Patience is idiomatic. Blisse is deciding. Blisse is brutal. Blisse is takeout. Blisse is lyric. Blisse is canonised. Blisse is idiomatic. Blisse is caruncular. Tricia is canonised. Tricia is caruncular. All canonised, lyric people are caruncular. Round people are takeout. Green people are caruncular. Quiet, lyric people are caruncular. If someone is canonised and deciding then they are brutal. Round, caruncular people are lyric. Patience is not deciding.", "logic": "\nDeciding(patience)\nCanonised(patience)\nIdiomatic(patience)\nDeciding(blisse)\nBrutal(blisse)\nTakeout(blisse)\nLyric(blisse)\nCanonised(blisse)\nIdiomatic(blisse)\nCaruncular(blisse)\nCanonised(tricia)\nCaruncular(tricia)\nforall x (Canonised(x) and Lyric(x) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) -> Takeout(x))\nforall x (Takeout(x) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Canonised(x) and Lyric(x) -> Caruncular(x))\nforall x (Canonised(x) and Deciding(x) -> Brutal(x))\nforall x (Idiomatic(x) and Caruncular(x) -> Lyric(x))\n\nnot Deciding(patience)\n\ntherefore Deciding(patience)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Leonhard is scripted. Leonhard is fifth. Leonhard is bouncing. Giovanna is scripted. Giovanna is ropy. Giovanna is pulverized. Giovanna is like. Giovanna is fifth. Giovanna is bouncing. Giovanna is jade. Guy is fifth. Guy is jade. All fifth, like people are jade. Round people are pulverized. Green people are jade. Quiet, like people are jade. If someone is fifth and scripted then they are ropy. Round, jade people are like. Leonhard is pulverized.", "logic": "\nScripted(leonhard)\nFifth(leonhard)\nBouncing(leonhard)\nScripted(giovanna)\nRopy(giovanna)\nPulverized(giovanna)\nLike(giovanna)\nFifth(giovanna)\nBouncing(giovanna)\nJade(giovanna)\nFifth(guy)\nJade(guy)\nforall x (Fifth(x) and Like(x) -> Jade(x))\nforall x (Bouncing(x) -> Pulverized(x))\nforall x (Pulverized(x) -> Jade(x))\nforall x (Fifth(x) and Like(x) -> Jade(x))\nforall x (Fifth(x) and Scripted(x) -> Ropy(x))\nforall x (Bouncing(x) and Jade(x) -> Like(x))\n\nPulverized(leonhard)\n\nBouncing(leonhard) and forall x (Bouncing(x) -> Pulverized(x)) -> therefore Pulverized(leonhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Jewell is sudsy. Jewell is xciv. Jewell is asynergic. Cornelle is sudsy. Cornelle is plumate. Cornelle is blastemic. Cornelle is unwieldy. Cornelle is xciv. Cornelle is asynergic. Cornelle is bosomed. Neda is xciv. Neda is bosomed. All xciv, unwieldy people are bosomed. Round people are blastemic. Green people are bosomed. Quiet, unwieldy people are bosomed. If someone is xciv and sudsy then they are plumate. Round, bosomed people are unwieldy. Jewell is not plumate.", "logic": "\nSudsy(jewell)\nXciv(jewell)\nAsynergic(jewell)\nSudsy(cornelle)\nPlumate(cornelle)\nBlastemic(cornelle)\nUnwieldy(cornelle)\nXciv(cornelle)\nAsynergic(cornelle)\nBosomed(cornelle)\nXciv(neda)\nBosomed(neda)\nforall x (Xciv(x) and Unwieldy(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Asynergic(x) -> Blastemic(x))\nforall x (Blastemic(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Xciv(x) and Unwieldy(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Xciv(x) and Sudsy(x) -> Plumate(x))\nforall x (Asynergic(x) and Bosomed(x) -> Unwieldy(x))\n\nnot Plumate(jewell)\n\nXciv(jewell) and Sudsy(jewell) and forall x (Xciv(x) and Sudsy(x) -> Plumate(x)) -> therefore Plumate(jewell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Rolf is couthie. Rolf is glottal. Rolf is palatal. Shea is couthie. Shea is gamey. Shea is polyphase. Shea is boiled. Shea is glottal. Shea is palatal. Shea is unhelpful. Moina is glottal. Moina is unhelpful. All glottal, boiled people are unhelpful. Round people are polyphase. Green people are unhelpful. Quiet, boiled people are unhelpful. If someone is glottal and couthie then they are gamey. Round, unhelpful people are boiled. Rolf is unhelpful.", "logic": "\nCouthie(rolf)\nGlottal(rolf)\nPalatal(rolf)\nCouthie(shea)\nGamey(shea)\nPolyphase(shea)\nBoiled(shea)\nGlottal(shea)\nPalatal(shea)\nUnhelpful(shea)\nGlottal(moina)\nUnhelpful(moina)\nforall x (Glottal(x) and Boiled(x) -> Unhelpful(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> Polyphase(x))\nforall x (Polyphase(x) -> Unhelpful(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) and Boiled(x) -> Unhelpful(x))\nforall x (Glottal(x) and Couthie(x) -> Gamey(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) and Unhelpful(x) -> Boiled(x))\n\nUnhelpful(rolf)\n\nPalatal(rolf) and forall x (Palatal(x) -> Polyphase(x)) -> therefore Polyphase(rolf) Polyphase(rolf) and forall x (Polyphase(x) -> Unhelpful(x)) -> therefore Unhelpful(rolf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Libby is laden. Libby is ceylonese. Libby is dingy. Paule is laden. Paule is fouled. Paule is duodenal. Paule is sinning. Paule is ceylonese. Paule is dingy. Paule is undefeated. Fletcher is ceylonese. Fletcher is undefeated. All ceylonese, sinning people are undefeated. Round people are duodenal. Green people are undefeated. Quiet, sinning people are undefeated. If someone is ceylonese and laden then they are fouled. Round, undefeated people are sinning. Libby is not undefeated.", "logic": "\nLaden(libby)\nCeylonese(libby)\nDingy(libby)\nLaden(paule)\nFouled(paule)\nDuodenal(paule)\nSinning(paule)\nCeylonese(paule)\nDingy(paule)\nUndefeated(paule)\nCeylonese(fletcher)\nUndefeated(fletcher)\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) and Sinning(x) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Dingy(x) -> Duodenal(x))\nforall x (Duodenal(x) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) and Sinning(x) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) and Laden(x) -> Fouled(x))\nforall x (Dingy(x) and Undefeated(x) -> Sinning(x))\n\nnot Undefeated(libby)\n\nDingy(libby) and forall x (Dingy(x) -> Duodenal(x)) -> therefore Duodenal(libby) Duodenal(libby) and forall x (Duodenal(x) -> Undefeated(x)) -> therefore Undefeated(libby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Becca is alterable. Becca is faux. Becca is sizable. Dorry is alterable. Dorry is torulose. Dorry is paunchy. Dorry is pilose. Dorry is faux. Dorry is sizable. Dorry is hydraulic. Bryn is faux. Bryn is hydraulic. All faux, pilose people are hydraulic. Round people are paunchy. Green people are hydraulic. Quiet, pilose people are hydraulic. If someone is faux and alterable then they are torulose. Round, hydraulic people are pilose. Becca is pilose.", "logic": "\nAlterable(becca)\nFaux(becca)\nSizable(becca)\nAlterable(dorry)\nTorulose(dorry)\nPaunchy(dorry)\nPilose(dorry)\nFaux(dorry)\nSizable(dorry)\nHydraulic(dorry)\nFaux(bryn)\nHydraulic(bryn)\nforall x (Faux(x) and Pilose(x) -> Hydraulic(x))\nforall x (Sizable(x) -> Paunchy(x))\nforall x (Paunchy(x) -> Hydraulic(x))\nforall x (Faux(x) and Pilose(x) -> Hydraulic(x))\nforall x (Faux(x) and Alterable(x) -> Torulose(x))\nforall x (Sizable(x) and Hydraulic(x) -> Pilose(x))\n\nPilose(becca)\n\nSizable(becca) and forall x (Sizable(x) -> Paunchy(x)) -> therefore Paunchy(becca) Paunchy(becca) and forall x (Paunchy(x) -> Hydraulic(x)) -> therefore Hydraulic(becca) Sizable(becca) and Hydraulic(becca) and forall x (Sizable(x) and Hydraulic(x) -> Pilose(x)) -> therefore Pilose(becca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Olga is frizzy. Olga is reluctant. Olga is amoeboid. Jaime is frizzy. Jaime is huddled. Jaime is partitive. Jaime is directive. Jaime is reluctant. Jaime is amoeboid. Jaime is unnumbered. Erna is reluctant. Erna is unnumbered. All reluctant, directive people are unnumbered. Round people are partitive. Green people are unnumbered. Quiet, directive people are unnumbered. If someone is reluctant and frizzy then they are huddled. Round, unnumbered people are directive. Olga is not directive.", "logic": "\nFrizzy(olga)\nReluctant(olga)\nAmoeboid(olga)\nFrizzy(jaime)\nHuddled(jaime)\nPartitive(jaime)\nDirective(jaime)\nReluctant(jaime)\nAmoeboid(jaime)\nUnnumbered(jaime)\nReluctant(erna)\nUnnumbered(erna)\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and Directive(x) -> Unnumbered(x))\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Partitive(x))\nforall x (Partitive(x) -> Unnumbered(x))\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and Directive(x) -> Unnumbered(x))\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and Frizzy(x) -> Huddled(x))\nforall x (Amoeboid(x) and Unnumbered(x) -> Directive(x))\n\nnot Directive(olga)\n\nAmoeboid(olga) and forall x (Amoeboid(x) -> Partitive(x)) -> therefore Partitive(olga) Partitive(olga) and forall x (Partitive(x) -> Unnumbered(x)) -> therefore Unnumbered(olga) Amoeboid(olga) and Unnumbered(olga) and forall x (Amoeboid(x) and Unnumbered(x) -> Directive(x)) -> therefore Directive(olga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Martynne is okay. Martynne is friendly. Martynne is voiced. Corliss is okay. Corliss is iritic. Corliss is asynergic. Corliss is amharic. Corliss is friendly. Corliss is voiced. Corliss is archival. Pearla is friendly. Pearla is archival. All friendly, amharic people are archival. Round people are asynergic. Green people are archival. Quiet, amharic people are archival. If someone is friendly and okay then they are iritic. Round, archival people are amharic. Pearla is not asynergic.", "logic": "\nOkay(martynne)\nFriendly(martynne)\nVoiced(martynne)\nOkay(corliss)\nIritic(corliss)\nAsynergic(corliss)\nAmharic(corliss)\nFriendly(corliss)\nVoiced(corliss)\nArchival(corliss)\nFriendly(pearla)\nArchival(pearla)\nforall x (Friendly(x) and Amharic(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Voiced(x) -> Asynergic(x))\nforall x (Asynergic(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Friendly(x) and Amharic(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Friendly(x) and Okay(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Voiced(x) and Archival(x) -> Amharic(x))\n\nnot Asynergic(pearla)\n\nforall x (Voiced(x) -> Asynergic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Arron is aneuploid. Arron is limbless. Arron is inchoative. Trevor is aneuploid. Trevor is genetic. Trevor is triune. Trevor is unplanned. Trevor is limbless. Trevor is inchoative. Trevor is ministrant. Dora is limbless. Dora is ministrant. All limbless, unplanned people are ministrant. Round people are triune. Green people are ministrant. Quiet, unplanned people are ministrant. If someone is limbless and aneuploid then they are genetic. Round, ministrant people are unplanned. Dora is genetic.", "logic": "\nAneuploid(arron)\nLimbless(arron)\nInchoative(arron)\nAneuploid(trevor)\nGenetic(trevor)\nTriune(trevor)\nUnplanned(trevor)\nLimbless(trevor)\nInchoative(trevor)\nMinistrant(trevor)\nLimbless(dora)\nMinistrant(dora)\nforall x (Limbless(x) and Unplanned(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) -> Triune(x))\nforall x (Triune(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Limbless(x) and Unplanned(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Limbless(x) and Aneuploid(x) -> Genetic(x))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) and Ministrant(x) -> Unplanned(x))\n\nGenetic(dora)\n\nforall x (Limbless(x) and Aneuploid(x) -> Genetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Wyndham is bisontine. Wyndham is disheveled. Wyndham is palladian. Gabbi is bisontine. Gabbi is deskbound. Gabbi is ghostly. Gabbi is filiform. Gabbi is disheveled. Gabbi is palladian. Gabbi is deranged. Betteann is disheveled. Betteann is deranged. All disheveled, filiform people are deranged. Round people are ghostly. Green people are deranged. Quiet, filiform people are deranged. If someone is disheveled and bisontine then they are deskbound. Round, deranged people are filiform. Betteann is not filiform.", "logic": "\nBisontine(wyndham)\nDisheveled(wyndham)\nPalladian(wyndham)\nBisontine(gabbi)\nDeskbound(gabbi)\nGhostly(gabbi)\nFiliform(gabbi)\nDisheveled(gabbi)\nPalladian(gabbi)\nDeranged(gabbi)\nDisheveled(betteann)\nDeranged(betteann)\nforall x (Disheveled(x) and Filiform(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Ghostly(x))\nforall x (Ghostly(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Disheveled(x) and Filiform(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Disheveled(x) and Bisontine(x) -> Deskbound(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) and Deranged(x) -> Filiform(x))\n\nnot Filiform(betteann)\n\nforall x (Palladian(x) and Deranged(x) -> Filiform(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Sonny is marvellous. Sonny is cowled. Sonny is invariant. Arvin is marvellous. Arvin is pauline. Arvin is colloquial. Arvin is trenchant. Arvin is cowled. Arvin is invariant. Arvin is unvendible. Zacharias is cowled. Zacharias is unvendible. All cowled, trenchant people are unvendible. Round people are colloquial. Green people are unvendible. Quiet, trenchant people are unvendible. If someone is cowled and marvellous then they are pauline. Round, unvendible people are trenchant. Zacharias is invariant.", "logic": "\nMarvellous(sonny)\nCowled(sonny)\nInvariant(sonny)\nMarvellous(arvin)\nPauline(arvin)\nColloquial(arvin)\nTrenchant(arvin)\nCowled(arvin)\nInvariant(arvin)\nUnvendible(arvin)\nCowled(zacharias)\nUnvendible(zacharias)\nforall x (Cowled(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Invariant(x) -> Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Colloquial(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Cowled(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Unvendible(x))\nforall x (Cowled(x) and Marvellous(x) -> Pauline(x))\nforall x (Invariant(x) and Unvendible(x) -> Trenchant(x))\n\nInvariant(zacharias)\n\nInvariant(zacharias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1762"} {"premises": "Giorgia is dissenting. Giorgia is unmade. Giorgia is messianic. Giorgia is forfeit. Giorgia is fiddling. John is dissenting. Astrix is altruistic. Young things are altruistic. All fiddling things are unmade. If Giorgia is elongate then Giorgia is messianic. If something is fiddling and altruistic then it is elongate. If something is fiddling then it is messianic. All altruistic, forfeit things are elongate. Round, dissenting things are altruistic. White, dissenting things are fiddling. Giorgia is unmade.", "logic": "\nDissenting(giorgia)\nUnmade(giorgia)\nMessianic(giorgia)\nForfeit(giorgia)\nFiddling(giorgia)\nDissenting(john)\nAltruistic(astrix)\nforall x (Fiddling(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Fiddling(x) -> Unmade(x))\nElongate(giorgia) -> Messianic(giorgia)\nforall x (Fiddling(x) and Altruistic(x) -> Elongate(x))\nforall x (Fiddling(x) -> Messianic(x))\nforall x (Altruistic(x) and Forfeit(x) -> Elongate(x))\nforall x (Elongate(x) and Dissenting(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Altruistic(x) and Dissenting(x) -> Fiddling(x))\n\nUnmade(giorgia)\n\ntherefore Unmade(giorgia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "Luther is finite. Luther is pleased. Luther is sleepless. Luther is cometic. Luther is bestial. Lolita is finite. Vincents is ravening. Young things are ravening. All bestial things are pleased. If Luther is prominent then Luther is sleepless. If something is bestial and ravening then it is prominent. If something is bestial then it is sleepless. All ravening, cometic things are prominent. Round, finite things are ravening. White, finite things are bestial. Vincents is not ravening.", "logic": "\nFinite(luther)\nPleased(luther)\nSleepless(luther)\nCometic(luther)\nBestial(luther)\nFinite(lolita)\nRavening(vincents)\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Ravening(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Pleased(x))\nProminent(luther) -> Sleepless(luther)\nforall x (Bestial(x) and Ravening(x) -> Prominent(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Sleepless(x))\nforall x (Ravening(x) and Cometic(x) -> Prominent(x))\nforall x (Prominent(x) and Finite(x) -> Ravening(x))\nforall x (Ravening(x) and Finite(x) -> Bestial(x))\n\nnot Ravening(vincents)\n\ntherefore Ravening(vincents)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "Bard is quality. Bard is given. Bard is nonsense. Bard is uncial. Bard is couthy. Rici is quality. Loella is trifid. Young things are trifid. All couthy things are given. If Bard is pass then Bard is nonsense. If something is couthy and trifid then it is pass. If something is couthy then it is nonsense. All trifid, uncial things are pass. Round, quality things are trifid. White, quality things are couthy. Bard is trifid.", "logic": "\nQuality(bard)\nGiven(bard)\nNonsense(bard)\nUncial(bard)\nCouthy(bard)\nQuality(rici)\nTrifid(loella)\nforall x (Couthy(x) -> Trifid(x))\nforall x (Couthy(x) -> Given(x))\nPass(bard) -> Nonsense(bard)\nforall x (Couthy(x) and Trifid(x) -> Pass(x))\nforall x (Couthy(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nforall x (Trifid(x) and Uncial(x) -> Pass(x))\nforall x (Pass(x) and Quality(x) -> Trifid(x))\nforall x (Trifid(x) and Quality(x) -> Couthy(x))\n\nTrifid(bard)\n\nCouthy(bard) and forall x (Couthy(x) -> Trifid(x)) -> therefore Trifid(bard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "Jobey is inveterate. Jobey is undimmed. Jobey is handwoven. Jobey is sulfuric. Jobey is sisyphean. Sallee is inveterate. Melony is uneducated. Young things are uneducated. All sisyphean things are undimmed. If Jobey is erasable then Jobey is handwoven. If something is sisyphean and uneducated then it is erasable. If something is sisyphean then it is handwoven. All uneducated, sulfuric things are erasable. Round, inveterate things are uneducated. White, inveterate things are sisyphean. Jobey is not uneducated.", "logic": "\nInveterate(jobey)\nUndimmed(jobey)\nHandwoven(jobey)\nSulfuric(jobey)\nSisyphean(jobey)\nInveterate(sallee)\nUneducated(melony)\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Undimmed(x))\nErasable(jobey) -> Handwoven(jobey)\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Uneducated(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Handwoven(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Sulfuric(x) -> Erasable(x))\nforall x (Erasable(x) and Inveterate(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Uneducated(x) and Inveterate(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\n\nnot Uneducated(jobey)\n\nSisyphean(jobey) and forall x (Sisyphean(x) -> Uneducated(x)) -> therefore Uneducated(jobey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "Orly is briary. Orly is versed. Orly is mazed. Orly is immediate. Orly is milled. Verge is briary. Teressa is deceitful. Young things are deceitful. All milled things are versed. If Orly is monatomic then Orly is mazed. If something is milled and deceitful then it is monatomic. If something is milled then it is mazed. All deceitful, immediate things are monatomic. Round, briary things are deceitful. White, briary things are milled. Verge is not deceitful.", "logic": "\nBriary(orly)\nVersed(orly)\nMazed(orly)\nImmediate(orly)\nMilled(orly)\nBriary(verge)\nDeceitful(teressa)\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Deceitful(x))\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Versed(x))\nMonatomic(orly) -> Mazed(orly)\nforall x (Milled(x) and Deceitful(x) -> Monatomic(x))\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Mazed(x))\nforall x (Deceitful(x) and Immediate(x) -> Monatomic(x))\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Briary(x) -> Deceitful(x))\nforall x (Deceitful(x) and Briary(x) -> Milled(x))\n\nnot Deceitful(verge)\n\nforall x (Milled(x) -> Deceitful(x)) <- forall x (Deceitful(x) and Briary(x) -> Milled(x)) <- forall x (Monatomic(x) and Briary(x) -> Deceitful(x)) <- forall x (Milled(x) and Deceitful(x) -> Monatomic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "Blondie is fierce. Blondie is usurious. Blondie is ratlike. Blondie is prepupal. Blondie is edwardian. Bryon is fierce. Lizbeth is nationwide. Young things are nationwide. All edwardian things are usurious. If Blondie is beefy then Blondie is ratlike. If something is edwardian and nationwide then it is beefy. If something is edwardian then it is ratlike. All nationwide, prepupal things are beefy. Round, fierce things are nationwide. White, fierce things are edwardian. Bryon is edwardian.", "logic": "\nFierce(blondie)\nUsurious(blondie)\nRatlike(blondie)\nPrepupal(blondie)\nEdwardian(blondie)\nFierce(bryon)\nNationwide(lizbeth)\nforall x (Edwardian(x) -> Nationwide(x))\nforall x (Edwardian(x) -> Usurious(x))\nBeefy(blondie) -> Ratlike(blondie)\nforall x (Edwardian(x) and Nationwide(x) -> Beefy(x))\nforall x (Edwardian(x) -> Ratlike(x))\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and Prepupal(x) -> Beefy(x))\nforall x (Beefy(x) and Fierce(x) -> Nationwide(x))\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and Fierce(x) -> Edwardian(x))\n\nEdwardian(bryon)\n\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and Fierce(x) -> Edwardian(x)) <- forall x (Beefy(x) and Fierce(x) -> Nationwide(x)) <- forall x (Edwardian(x) and Nationwide(x) -> Beefy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "Wynnie is cosmogonic. Wynnie is substitute. Wynnie is unbranched. Wynnie is unstressed. Wynnie is earliest. Charo is cosmogonic. Rochette is autocratic. Young things are autocratic. All earliest things are substitute. If Wynnie is lightsome then Wynnie is unbranched. If something is earliest and autocratic then it is lightsome. If something is earliest then it is unbranched. All autocratic, unstressed things are lightsome. Round, cosmogonic things are autocratic. White, cosmogonic things are earliest. Charo is not unstressed.", "logic": "\nCosmogonic(wynnie)\nSubstitute(wynnie)\nUnbranched(wynnie)\nUnstressed(wynnie)\nEarliest(wynnie)\nCosmogonic(charo)\nAutocratic(rochette)\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Autocratic(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Substitute(x))\nLightsome(wynnie) -> Unbranched(wynnie)\nforall x (Earliest(x) and Autocratic(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Unbranched(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) and Unstressed(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Autocratic(x))\nforall x (Autocratic(x) and Cosmogonic(x) -> Earliest(x))\n\nnot Unstressed(charo)\n\nnot Unstressed(charo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "Rik is unwarmed. Rik is lashing. Rik is righteous. Rik is sybaritic. Rik is skirting. Socrates is unwarmed. Clarey is wroth. Young things are wroth. All skirting things are lashing. If Rik is autoicous then Rik is righteous. If something is skirting and wroth then it is autoicous. If something is skirting then it is righteous. All wroth, sybaritic things are autoicous. Round, unwarmed things are wroth. White, unwarmed things are skirting. Clarey is unwarmed.", "logic": "\nUnwarmed(rik)\nLashing(rik)\nRighteous(rik)\nSybaritic(rik)\nSkirting(rik)\nUnwarmed(socrates)\nWroth(clarey)\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Wroth(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Lashing(x))\nAutoicous(rik) -> Righteous(rik)\nforall x (Skirting(x) and Wroth(x) -> Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Righteous(x))\nforall x (Wroth(x) and Sybaritic(x) -> Autoicous(x))\nforall x (Autoicous(x) and Unwarmed(x) -> Wroth(x))\nforall x (Wroth(x) and Unwarmed(x) -> Skirting(x))\n\nUnwarmed(clarey)\n\nUnwarmed(clarey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2448"} {"premises": "The morton telefax the kingsley. The morton is waxy. The morton is distaff. The morton is clouded. The morton hire the kingsley. The morton wreak the kingsley. The kingsley is waxy. If the morton telefax the kingsley and the kingsley does not need the morton then the morton does not see the kingsley. If someone hire the kingsley then the kingsley is not endurable. If the kingsley is not endurable then the kingsley is not clouded. The morton is distaff.", "logic": "\nTelefax(morton, kingsley)\nWaxy(morton)\nDistaff(morton)\nClouded(morton)\nHire(morton, kingsley)\nWreak(morton, kingsley)\nWaxy(kingsley)\nTelefax(morton, kingsley) and not Hire(kingsley, morton) -> not Wreak(morton, kingsley)\nforall x (Hire(x, kingsley) -> not Endurable(kingsley))\nnot Endurable(kingsley) -> not Clouded(kingsley)\n\nDistaff(morton)\n\ntherefore Distaff(morton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The faith articulate the kameko. The faith is graceful. The faith is unscathed. The faith is corporal. The faith initialise the kameko. The faith cinematize the kameko. The kameko is graceful. If the faith articulate the kameko and the kameko does not need the faith then the faith does not see the kameko. If someone initialise the kameko then the kameko is not immaterial. If the kameko is not immaterial then the kameko is not corporal. The faith is not unscathed.", "logic": "\nArticulate(faith, kameko)\nGraceful(faith)\nUnscathed(faith)\nCorporal(faith)\nInitialise(faith, kameko)\nCinematize(faith, kameko)\nGraceful(kameko)\nArticulate(faith, kameko) and not Initialise(kameko, faith) -> not Cinematize(faith, kameko)\nforall x (Initialise(x, kameko) -> not Immaterial(kameko))\nnot Immaterial(kameko) -> not Corporal(kameko)\n\nnot Unscathed(faith)\n\ntherefore Unscathed(faith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The ilyssa diet the kori. The ilyssa is thousand. The ilyssa is doctrinal. The ilyssa is corrupted. The ilyssa perennate the kori. The ilyssa polymerize the kori. The kori is thousand. If the ilyssa diet the kori and the kori does not need the ilyssa then the ilyssa does not see the kori. If someone perennate the kori then the kori is not catchpenny. If the kori is not catchpenny then the kori is not corrupted. The kori is not catchpenny.", "logic": "\nDiet(ilyssa, kori)\nThousand(ilyssa)\nDoctrinal(ilyssa)\nCorrupted(ilyssa)\nPerennate(ilyssa, kori)\nPolymerize(ilyssa, kori)\nThousand(kori)\nDiet(ilyssa, kori) and not Perennate(kori, ilyssa) -> not Polymerize(ilyssa, kori)\nforall x (Perennate(x, kori) -> not Catchpenny(kori))\nnot Catchpenny(kori) -> not Corrupted(kori)\n\nnot Catchpenny(kori)\n\nPerennate(ilyssa, kori) and forall x (Perennate(x, kori) -> not Catchpenny(kori)) -> therefore not Catchpenny(kori)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The steffie sublime the carli. The steffie is taking. The steffie is downscale. The steffie is kept. The steffie snowshoe the carli. The steffie crave the carli. The carli is taking. If the steffie sublime the carli and the carli does not need the steffie then the steffie does not see the carli. If someone snowshoe the carli then the carli is not croatian. If the carli is not croatian then the carli is not kept. The carli is croatian.", "logic": "\nSublime(steffie, carli)\nTaking(steffie)\nDownscale(steffie)\nKept(steffie)\nSnowshoe(steffie, carli)\nCrave(steffie, carli)\nTaking(carli)\nSublime(steffie, carli) and not Snowshoe(carli, steffie) -> not Crave(steffie, carli)\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, carli) -> not Croatian(carli))\nnot Croatian(carli) -> not Kept(carli)\n\nCroatian(carli)\n\nSnowshoe(steffie, carli) and forall x (Snowshoe(x, carli) -> not Croatian(carli)) -> therefore not Croatian(carli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The leola dredge the alica. The leola is animistic. The leola is severe. The leola is ectodermal. The leola loom the alica. The leola flare the alica. The alica is animistic. If the leola dredge the alica and the alica does not need the leola then the leola does not see the alica. If someone loom the alica then the alica is not rhomboidal. If the alica is not rhomboidal then the alica is not ectodermal. The alica is not big.", "logic": "\nDredge(leola, alica)\nAnimistic(leola)\nSevere(leola)\nEctodermal(leola)\nLoom(leola, alica)\nFlare(leola, alica)\nAnimistic(alica)\nDredge(leola, alica) and not Loom(alica, leola) -> not Flare(leola, alica)\nforall x (Loom(x, alica) -> not Rhomboidal(alica))\nnot Rhomboidal(alica) -> not Ectodermal(alica)\n\nnot Big(alica)\n\nnot Big(alica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The casi capacitate the marylee. The casi is nonaligned. The casi is shrunken. The casi is volunteer. The casi purvey the marylee. The casi disfigure the marylee. The marylee is nonaligned. If the casi capacitate the marylee and the marylee does not need the casi then the casi does not see the marylee. If someone purvey the marylee then the marylee is not schematic. If the marylee is not schematic then the marylee is not volunteer. The marylee capacitate the marylee.", "logic": "\nCapacitate(casi, marylee)\nNonaligned(casi)\nShrunken(casi)\nVolunteer(casi)\nPurvey(casi, marylee)\nDisfigure(casi, marylee)\nNonaligned(marylee)\nCapacitate(casi, marylee) and not Purvey(marylee, casi) -> not Disfigure(casi, marylee)\nforall x (Purvey(x, marylee) -> not Schematic(marylee))\nnot Schematic(marylee) -> not Volunteer(marylee)\n\nCapacitate(marylee, marylee)\n\nCapacitate(marylee, marylee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The reggis misgauge the paige. The reggis is unremedied. The reggis is untypical. The reggis is ariose. The reggis ancylose the paige. The reggis reave the paige. The paige is unremedied. If the reggis misgauge the paige and the paige does not need the reggis then the reggis does not see the paige. If someone ancylose the paige then the paige is not nonrigid. If the paige is not nonrigid then the paige is not ariose. The paige does not need the paige.", "logic": "\nMisgauge(reggis, paige)\nUnremedied(reggis)\nUntypical(reggis)\nAriose(reggis)\nAncylose(reggis, paige)\nReave(reggis, paige)\nUnremedied(paige)\nMisgauge(reggis, paige) and not Ancylose(paige, reggis) -> not Reave(reggis, paige)\nforall x (Ancylose(x, paige) -> not Nonrigid(paige))\nnot Nonrigid(paige) -> not Ariose(paige)\n\nnot Ancylose(paige, paige)\n\nnot Ancylose(paige, paige) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The barbabra atrophy the dustin. The barbabra is incautious. The barbabra is shrewish. The barbabra is unrenewed. The barbabra blither the dustin. The barbabra tingle the dustin. The dustin is incautious. If the barbabra atrophy the dustin and the dustin does not need the barbabra then the barbabra does not see the dustin. If someone blither the dustin then the dustin is not daunted. If the dustin is not daunted then the dustin is not unrenewed. The dustin atrophy the barbabra.", "logic": "\nAtrophy(barbabra, dustin)\nIncautious(barbabra)\nShrewish(barbabra)\nUnrenewed(barbabra)\nBlither(barbabra, dustin)\nTingle(barbabra, dustin)\nIncautious(dustin)\nAtrophy(barbabra, dustin) and not Blither(dustin, barbabra) -> not Tingle(barbabra, dustin)\nforall x (Blither(x, dustin) -> not Daunted(dustin))\nnot Daunted(dustin) -> not Unrenewed(dustin)\n\nAtrophy(dustin, barbabra)\n\nAtrophy(dustin, barbabra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2213"} {"premises": "The desaree is isthmian. The desaree is aortal. The desaree is saline. The desaree is ailing. The desaree is deductive. Rough people are isthmian. The desaree is ailing.", "logic": "\nIsthmian(desaree)\nAortal(desaree)\nSaline(desaree)\nAiling(desaree)\nDeductive(desaree)\nforall x (Ailing(x) -> Isthmian(x))\n\nAiling(desaree)\n\ntherefore Ailing(desaree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4003"} {"premises": "The mattie is declared. The mattie is prismatic. The mattie is cheating. The mattie is rhythmic. The mattie is pancreatic. Rough people are declared. The mattie is not pancreatic.", "logic": "\nDeclared(mattie)\nPrismatic(mattie)\nCheating(mattie)\nRhythmic(mattie)\nPancreatic(mattie)\nforall x (Rhythmic(x) -> Declared(x))\n\nnot Pancreatic(mattie)\n\ntherefore Pancreatic(mattie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4003"} {"premises": "The melantha is alright. The melantha is unsealed. The melantha is dateable. The melantha is saxatile. The melantha is neurotic. Rough people are alright. The melantha does not see the melantha.", "logic": "\nAlright(melantha)\nUnsealed(melantha)\nDateable(melantha)\nSaxatile(melantha)\nNeurotic(melantha)\nforall x (Saxatile(x) -> Alright(x))\n\nnot Sees(melantha, melantha)\n\nnot Sees(melantha, melantha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4003"} {"premises": "The dulcia is archival. The dulcia is hooklike. The dulcia is libidinous. The dulcia is unvaned. The dulcia is sagittate. Rough people are archival. The dulcia visits the dulcia.", "logic": "\nArchival(dulcia)\nHooklike(dulcia)\nLibidinous(dulcia)\nUnvaned(dulcia)\nSagittate(dulcia)\nforall x (Unvaned(x) -> Archival(x))\n\nVisits(dulcia, dulcia)\n\nVisits(dulcia, dulcia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4003"} {"premises": "The sallie inculpate the carlye. The carlye inculpate the sallie. The pammie inculpate the sallie. If someone malversate the pammie then they chase the pammie. If someone defy the carlye and they are catching then the carlye is not catching. If someone is irascible then they chase the sallie. The carlye inculpate the sallie.", "logic": "\nInculpate(sallie, carlye)\nInculpate(carlye, sallie)\nInculpate(pammie, sallie)\nforall x (Malversate(x, pammie) -> Inculpate(x, pammie))\nforall x (Defy(x, carlye) and Catching(x) -> not Catching(carlye))\nforall x (Irascible(x) -> Inculpate(x, sallie))\n\nInculpate(carlye, sallie)\n\ntherefore Inculpate(carlye, sallie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3871"} {"premises": "The pier speckle the carl. The carl speckle the pier. The pete speckle the pier. If someone broker the pete then they chase the pete. If someone whop the carl and they are uncritical then the carl is not uncritical. If someone is chesty then they chase the pier. The pier does not chase the carl.", "logic": "\nSpeckle(pier, carl)\nSpeckle(carl, pier)\nSpeckle(pete, pier)\nforall x (Broker(x, pete) -> Speckle(x, pete))\nforall x (Whop(x, carl) and Uncritical(x) -> not Uncritical(carl))\nforall x (Chesty(x) -> Speckle(x, pier))\n\nnot Speckle(pier, carl)\n\ntherefore Speckle(pier, carl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3871"} {"premises": "The ermina astrogate the lizzie. The lizzie astrogate the ermina. The meriel astrogate the ermina. If someone gasconade the meriel then they chase the meriel. If someone enkindle the lizzie and they are especial then the lizzie is not especial. If someone is velvet then they chase the ermina. The meriel does not chase the meriel.", "logic": "\nAstrogate(ermina, lizzie)\nAstrogate(lizzie, ermina)\nAstrogate(meriel, ermina)\nforall x (Gasconade(x, meriel) -> Astrogate(x, meriel))\nforall x (Enkindle(x, lizzie) and Especial(x) -> not Especial(lizzie))\nforall x (Velvet(x) -> Astrogate(x, ermina))\n\nnot Astrogate(meriel, meriel)\n\nforall x (Gasconade(x, meriel) -> Astrogate(x, meriel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3871"} {"premises": "The mala overtax the izak. The izak overtax the mala. The lindsey overtax the mala. If someone indurate the lindsey then they chase the lindsey. If someone overcrowd the izak and they are untufted then the izak is not untufted. If someone is ideologic then they chase the mala. The mala overcrowd the izak.", "logic": "\nOvertax(mala, izak)\nOvertax(izak, mala)\nOvertax(lindsey, mala)\nforall x (Indurate(x, lindsey) -> Overtax(x, lindsey))\nforall x (Overcrowd(x, izak) and Untufted(x) -> not Untufted(izak))\nforall x (Ideologic(x) -> Overtax(x, mala))\n\nOvercrowd(mala, izak)\n\nOvercrowd(mala, izak) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-3871"} {"premises": "The fanchon is huddled. The fanchon is dabbled. The fanchon strip the ester. The fanchon piddle the ottilie. The ottilie is autotypic. The ottilie dull the fanchon. The ottilie strip the fanchon. The ottilie strip the ester. The ottilie piddle the fanchon. The ottilie piddle the ester. The ester is autotypic. The ester dull the ottilie. If something is dabbled then it dull the ester. If something dull the ester then it piddle the ester. If something piddle the ester then it piddle the fanchon. The ester dull the ottilie.", "logic": "\nHuddled(fanchon)\nDabbled(fanchon)\nStrip(fanchon, ester)\nPiddle(fanchon, ottilie)\nAutotypic(ottilie)\nDull(ottilie, fanchon)\nStrip(ottilie, fanchon)\nStrip(ottilie, ester)\nPiddle(ottilie, fanchon)\nPiddle(ottilie, ester)\nAutotypic(ester)\nDull(ester, ottilie)\nforall x (Dabbled(x) -> Dull(x, ester))\nforall x (Dull(x, ester) -> Piddle(x, ester))\nforall x (Piddle(x, ester) -> Piddle(x, fanchon))\n\nDull(ester, ottilie)\n\ntherefore Dull(ester, ottilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The brinkley is familiar. The brinkley is munificent. The brinkley copyread the shurlock. The brinkley pulse the cristine. The cristine is afghani. The cristine embezzle the brinkley. The cristine copyread the brinkley. The cristine copyread the shurlock. The cristine pulse the brinkley. The cristine pulse the shurlock. The shurlock is afghani. The shurlock embezzle the cristine. If something is munificent then it embezzle the shurlock. If something embezzle the shurlock then it pulse the shurlock. If something pulse the shurlock then it pulse the brinkley. The shurlock does not like the cristine.", "logic": "\nFamiliar(brinkley)\nMunificent(brinkley)\nCopyread(brinkley, shurlock)\nPulse(brinkley, cristine)\nAfghani(cristine)\nEmbezzle(cristine, brinkley)\nCopyread(cristine, brinkley)\nCopyread(cristine, shurlock)\nPulse(cristine, brinkley)\nPulse(cristine, shurlock)\nAfghani(shurlock)\nEmbezzle(shurlock, cristine)\nforall x (Munificent(x) -> Embezzle(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Embezzle(x, shurlock) -> Pulse(x, shurlock))\nforall x (Pulse(x, shurlock) -> Pulse(x, brinkley))\n\nnot Embezzle(shurlock, cristine)\n\ntherefore Embezzle(shurlock, cristine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The felecia is elementary. The felecia is cross. The felecia sizzle the lyndel. The felecia attemper the julina. The julina is dysphoric. The julina favour the felecia. The julina sizzle the felecia. The julina sizzle the lyndel. The julina attemper the felecia. The julina attemper the lyndel. The lyndel is dysphoric. The lyndel favour the julina. If something is cross then it favour the lyndel. If something favour the lyndel then it attemper the lyndel. If something attemper the lyndel then it attemper the felecia. The felecia favour the lyndel.", "logic": "\nElementary(felecia)\nCross(felecia)\nSizzle(felecia, lyndel)\nAttemper(felecia, julina)\nDysphoric(julina)\nFavour(julina, felecia)\nSizzle(julina, felecia)\nSizzle(julina, lyndel)\nAttemper(julina, felecia)\nAttemper(julina, lyndel)\nDysphoric(lyndel)\nFavour(lyndel, julina)\nforall x (Cross(x) -> Favour(x, lyndel))\nforall x (Favour(x, lyndel) -> Attemper(x, lyndel))\nforall x (Attemper(x, lyndel) -> Attemper(x, felecia))\n\nFavour(felecia, lyndel)\n\nCross(felecia) and forall x (Cross(x) -> Favour(x, lyndel)) -> therefore Favour(felecia, lyndel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The morty is leftish. The morty is schematic. The morty meander the jephthah. The morty cluck the simmonds. The simmonds is locomotive. The simmonds grab the morty. The simmonds meander the morty. The simmonds meander the jephthah. The simmonds cluck the morty. The simmonds cluck the jephthah. The jephthah is locomotive. The jephthah grab the simmonds. If something is schematic then it grab the jephthah. If something grab the jephthah then it cluck the jephthah. If something cluck the jephthah then it cluck the morty. The morty does not like the jephthah.", "logic": "\nLeftish(morty)\nSchematic(morty)\nMeander(morty, jephthah)\nCluck(morty, simmonds)\nLocomotive(simmonds)\nGrab(simmonds, morty)\nMeander(simmonds, morty)\nMeander(simmonds, jephthah)\nCluck(simmonds, morty)\nCluck(simmonds, jephthah)\nLocomotive(jephthah)\nGrab(jephthah, simmonds)\nforall x (Schematic(x) -> Grab(x, jephthah))\nforall x (Grab(x, jephthah) -> Cluck(x, jephthah))\nforall x (Cluck(x, jephthah) -> Cluck(x, morty))\n\nnot Grab(morty, jephthah)\n\nSchematic(morty) and forall x (Schematic(x) -> Grab(x, jephthah)) -> therefore Grab(morty, jephthah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The chev is flagging. The chev is semisweet. The chev scrabble the mordecai. The chev flocculate the augustina. The augustina is epizoan. The augustina magnetise the chev. The augustina scrabble the chev. The augustina scrabble the mordecai. The augustina flocculate the chev. The augustina flocculate the mordecai. The mordecai is epizoan. The mordecai magnetise the augustina. If something is semisweet then it magnetise the mordecai. If something magnetise the mordecai then it flocculate the mordecai. If something flocculate the mordecai then it flocculate the chev. The chev flocculate the mordecai.", "logic": "\nFlagging(chev)\nSemisweet(chev)\nScrabble(chev, mordecai)\nFlocculate(chev, augustina)\nEpizoan(augustina)\nMagnetise(augustina, chev)\nScrabble(augustina, chev)\nScrabble(augustina, mordecai)\nFlocculate(augustina, chev)\nFlocculate(augustina, mordecai)\nEpizoan(mordecai)\nMagnetise(mordecai, augustina)\nforall x (Semisweet(x) -> Magnetise(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Magnetise(x, mordecai) -> Flocculate(x, mordecai))\nforall x (Flocculate(x, mordecai) -> Flocculate(x, chev))\n\nFlocculate(chev, mordecai)\n\nSemisweet(chev) and forall x (Semisweet(x) -> Magnetise(x, mordecai)) -> therefore Magnetise(chev, mordecai) Magnetise(chev, mordecai) and forall x (Magnetise(x, mordecai) -> Flocculate(x, mordecai)) -> therefore Flocculate(chev, mordecai)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The hymie is sufferable. The hymie is contested. The hymie tenant the tristan. The hymie gnaw the gustave. The gustave is contorted. The gustave troat the hymie. The gustave tenant the hymie. The gustave tenant the tristan. The gustave gnaw the hymie. The gustave gnaw the tristan. The tristan is contorted. The tristan troat the gustave. If something is contested then it troat the tristan. If something troat the tristan then it gnaw the tristan. If something gnaw the tristan then it gnaw the hymie. The hymie does not visit the tristan.", "logic": "\nSufferable(hymie)\nContested(hymie)\nTenant(hymie, tristan)\nGnaw(hymie, gustave)\nContorted(gustave)\nTroat(gustave, hymie)\nTenant(gustave, hymie)\nTenant(gustave, tristan)\nGnaw(gustave, hymie)\nGnaw(gustave, tristan)\nContorted(tristan)\nTroat(tristan, gustave)\nforall x (Contested(x) -> Troat(x, tristan))\nforall x (Troat(x, tristan) -> Gnaw(x, tristan))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, tristan) -> Gnaw(x, hymie))\n\nnot Gnaw(hymie, tristan)\n\nContested(hymie) and forall x (Contested(x) -> Troat(x, tristan)) -> therefore Troat(hymie, tristan) Troat(hymie, tristan) and forall x (Troat(x, tristan) -> Gnaw(x, tristan)) -> therefore Gnaw(hymie, tristan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The mignon is taken. The mignon is proto. The mignon discourage the humbert. The mignon slosh the emera. The emera is laotian. The emera segue the mignon. The emera discourage the mignon. The emera discourage the humbert. The emera slosh the mignon. The emera slosh the humbert. The humbert is laotian. The humbert segue the emera. If something is proto then it segue the humbert. If something segue the humbert then it slosh the humbert. If something slosh the humbert then it slosh the mignon. The mignon slosh the mignon.", "logic": "\nTaken(mignon)\nProto(mignon)\nDiscourage(mignon, humbert)\nSlosh(mignon, emera)\nLaotian(emera)\nSegue(emera, mignon)\nDiscourage(emera, mignon)\nDiscourage(emera, humbert)\nSlosh(emera, mignon)\nSlosh(emera, humbert)\nLaotian(humbert)\nSegue(humbert, emera)\nforall x (Proto(x) -> Segue(x, humbert))\nforall x (Segue(x, humbert) -> Slosh(x, humbert))\nforall x (Slosh(x, humbert) -> Slosh(x, mignon))\n\nSlosh(mignon, mignon)\n\nProto(mignon) and forall x (Proto(x) -> Segue(x, humbert)) -> therefore Segue(mignon, humbert) Segue(mignon, humbert) and forall x (Segue(x, humbert) -> Slosh(x, humbert)) -> therefore Slosh(mignon, humbert) Slosh(mignon, humbert) and forall x (Slosh(x, humbert) -> Slosh(x, mignon)) -> therefore Slosh(mignon, mignon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The benjamin is upbound. The benjamin is dysphoric. The benjamin simonize the letisha. The benjamin grub the darcee. The darcee is hanoverian. The darcee comment the benjamin. The darcee simonize the benjamin. The darcee simonize the letisha. The darcee grub the benjamin. The darcee grub the letisha. The letisha is hanoverian. The letisha comment the darcee. If something is dysphoric then it comment the letisha. If something comment the letisha then it grub the letisha. If something grub the letisha then it grub the benjamin. The benjamin does not visit the benjamin.", "logic": "\nUpbound(benjamin)\nDysphoric(benjamin)\nSimonize(benjamin, letisha)\nGrub(benjamin, darcee)\nHanoverian(darcee)\nComment(darcee, benjamin)\nSimonize(darcee, benjamin)\nSimonize(darcee, letisha)\nGrub(darcee, benjamin)\nGrub(darcee, letisha)\nHanoverian(letisha)\nComment(letisha, darcee)\nforall x (Dysphoric(x) -> Comment(x, letisha))\nforall x (Comment(x, letisha) -> Grub(x, letisha))\nforall x (Grub(x, letisha) -> Grub(x, benjamin))\n\nnot Grub(benjamin, benjamin)\n\nDysphoric(benjamin) and forall x (Dysphoric(x) -> Comment(x, letisha)) -> therefore Comment(benjamin, letisha) Comment(benjamin, letisha) and forall x (Comment(x, letisha) -> Grub(x, letisha)) -> therefore Grub(benjamin, letisha) Grub(benjamin, letisha) and forall x (Grub(x, letisha) -> Grub(x, benjamin)) -> therefore Grub(benjamin, benjamin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The ingemar is killable. The ingemar is unexcused. The ingemar stockpile the rycca. The ingemar dehumanise the osgood. The osgood is repayable. The osgood mediate the ingemar. The osgood stockpile the ingemar. The osgood stockpile the rycca. The osgood dehumanise the ingemar. The osgood dehumanise the rycca. The rycca is repayable. The rycca mediate the osgood. If something is unexcused then it mediate the rycca. If something mediate the rycca then it dehumanise the rycca. If something dehumanise the rycca then it dehumanise the ingemar. The rycca does not visit the rycca.", "logic": "\nKillable(ingemar)\nUnexcused(ingemar)\nStockpile(ingemar, rycca)\nDehumanise(ingemar, osgood)\nRepayable(osgood)\nMediate(osgood, ingemar)\nStockpile(osgood, ingemar)\nStockpile(osgood, rycca)\nDehumanise(osgood, ingemar)\nDehumanise(osgood, rycca)\nRepayable(rycca)\nMediate(rycca, osgood)\nforall x (Unexcused(x) -> Mediate(x, rycca))\nforall x (Mediate(x, rycca) -> Dehumanise(x, rycca))\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, rycca) -> Dehumanise(x, ingemar))\n\nnot Dehumanise(rycca, rycca)\n\nforall x (Mediate(x, rycca) -> Dehumanise(x, rycca)) <- forall x (Unexcused(x) -> Mediate(x, rycca)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The tamarra is amharic. The tamarra is untagged. The tamarra bruise the clarinda. The tamarra swatter the mellie. The mellie is unifilar. The mellie elaborate the tamarra. The mellie bruise the tamarra. The mellie bruise the clarinda. The mellie swatter the tamarra. The mellie swatter the clarinda. The clarinda is unifilar. The clarinda elaborate the mellie. If something is untagged then it elaborate the clarinda. If something elaborate the clarinda then it swatter the clarinda. If something swatter the clarinda then it swatter the tamarra. The clarinda elaborate the clarinda.", "logic": "\nAmharic(tamarra)\nUntagged(tamarra)\nBruise(tamarra, clarinda)\nSwatter(tamarra, mellie)\nUnifilar(mellie)\nElaborate(mellie, tamarra)\nBruise(mellie, tamarra)\nBruise(mellie, clarinda)\nSwatter(mellie, tamarra)\nSwatter(mellie, clarinda)\nUnifilar(clarinda)\nElaborate(clarinda, mellie)\nforall x (Untagged(x) -> Elaborate(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Elaborate(x, clarinda) -> Swatter(x, clarinda))\nforall x (Swatter(x, clarinda) -> Swatter(x, tamarra))\n\nElaborate(clarinda, clarinda)\n\nforall x (Untagged(x) -> Elaborate(x, clarinda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The winnah is seated. The winnah is moravian. The winnah trammel the koralle. The winnah cadge the storm. The storm is discarded. The storm dissertate the winnah. The storm trammel the winnah. The storm trammel the koralle. The storm cadge the winnah. The storm cadge the koralle. The koralle is discarded. The koralle dissertate the storm. If something is moravian then it dissertate the koralle. If something dissertate the koralle then it cadge the koralle. If something cadge the koralle then it cadge the winnah. The storm does not like the koralle.", "logic": "\nSeated(winnah)\nMoravian(winnah)\nTrammel(winnah, koralle)\nCadge(winnah, storm)\nDiscarded(storm)\nDissertate(storm, winnah)\nTrammel(storm, winnah)\nTrammel(storm, koralle)\nCadge(storm, winnah)\nCadge(storm, koralle)\nDiscarded(koralle)\nDissertate(koralle, storm)\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> Dissertate(x, koralle))\nforall x (Dissertate(x, koralle) -> Cadge(x, koralle))\nforall x (Cadge(x, koralle) -> Cadge(x, winnah))\n\nnot Dissertate(storm, koralle)\n\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> Dissertate(x, koralle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The trisha is moated. The trisha is immunised. The trisha becloud the josh. The trisha grace the noble. The noble is paraplegic. The noble allegorise the trisha. The noble becloud the trisha. The noble becloud the josh. The noble grace the trisha. The noble grace the josh. The josh is paraplegic. The josh allegorise the noble. If something is immunised then it allegorise the josh. If something allegorise the josh then it grace the josh. If something grace the josh then it grace the trisha. The josh grace the trisha.", "logic": "\nMoated(trisha)\nImmunised(trisha)\nBecloud(trisha, josh)\nGrace(trisha, noble)\nParaplegic(noble)\nAllegorise(noble, trisha)\nBecloud(noble, trisha)\nBecloud(noble, josh)\nGrace(noble, trisha)\nGrace(noble, josh)\nParaplegic(josh)\nAllegorise(josh, noble)\nforall x (Immunised(x) -> Allegorise(x, josh))\nforall x (Allegorise(x, josh) -> Grace(x, josh))\nforall x (Grace(x, josh) -> Grace(x, trisha))\n\nGrace(josh, trisha)\n\nforall x (Grace(x, josh) -> Grace(x, trisha)) <- forall x (Allegorise(x, josh) -> Grace(x, josh)) <- forall x (Immunised(x) -> Allegorise(x, josh)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The harriett is longish. The harriett is dastardly. The harriett roast the matthaeus. The harriett platinize the elva. The elva is inanimate. The elva alkalise the harriett. The elva roast the harriett. The elva roast the matthaeus. The elva platinize the harriett. The elva platinize the matthaeus. The matthaeus is inanimate. The matthaeus alkalise the elva. If something is dastardly then it alkalise the matthaeus. If something alkalise the matthaeus then it platinize the matthaeus. If something platinize the matthaeus then it platinize the harriett. The harriett is not inanimate.", "logic": "\nLongish(harriett)\nDastardly(harriett)\nRoast(harriett, matthaeus)\nPlatinize(harriett, elva)\nInanimate(elva)\nAlkalise(elva, harriett)\nRoast(elva, harriett)\nRoast(elva, matthaeus)\nPlatinize(elva, harriett)\nPlatinize(elva, matthaeus)\nInanimate(matthaeus)\nAlkalise(matthaeus, elva)\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Alkalise(x, matthaeus))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, matthaeus) -> Platinize(x, matthaeus))\nforall x (Platinize(x, matthaeus) -> Platinize(x, harriett))\n\nnot Inanimate(harriett)\n\nnot Inanimate(harriett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The tiana is affine. The tiana is calcareous. The tiana terrify the waleed. The tiana ostracise the joline. The joline is asteroidal. The joline detick the tiana. The joline terrify the tiana. The joline terrify the waleed. The joline ostracise the tiana. The joline ostracise the waleed. The waleed is asteroidal. The waleed detick the joline. If something is calcareous then it detick the waleed. If something detick the waleed then it ostracise the waleed. If something ostracise the waleed then it ostracise the tiana. The waleed is calcareous.", "logic": "\nAffine(tiana)\nCalcareous(tiana)\nTerrify(tiana, waleed)\nOstracise(tiana, joline)\nAsteroidal(joline)\nDetick(joline, tiana)\nTerrify(joline, tiana)\nTerrify(joline, waleed)\nOstracise(joline, tiana)\nOstracise(joline, waleed)\nAsteroidal(waleed)\nDetick(waleed, joline)\nforall x (Calcareous(x) -> Detick(x, waleed))\nforall x (Detick(x, waleed) -> Ostracise(x, waleed))\nforall x (Ostracise(x, waleed) -> Ostracise(x, tiana))\n\nCalcareous(waleed)\n\nCalcareous(waleed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The shurlock is pluperfect. The shurlock is monovalent. The shurlock shrink the joslyn. The shurlock abjure the alphonso. The alphonso is idealised. The alphonso unfurl the shurlock. The alphonso shrink the shurlock. The alphonso shrink the joslyn. The alphonso abjure the shurlock. The alphonso abjure the joslyn. The joslyn is idealised. The joslyn unfurl the alphonso. If something is monovalent then it unfurl the joslyn. If something unfurl the joslyn then it abjure the joslyn. If something abjure the joslyn then it abjure the shurlock. The shurlock does not like the alphonso.", "logic": "\nPluperfect(shurlock)\nMonovalent(shurlock)\nShrink(shurlock, joslyn)\nAbjure(shurlock, alphonso)\nIdealised(alphonso)\nUnfurl(alphonso, shurlock)\nShrink(alphonso, shurlock)\nShrink(alphonso, joslyn)\nAbjure(alphonso, shurlock)\nAbjure(alphonso, joslyn)\nIdealised(joslyn)\nUnfurl(joslyn, alphonso)\nforall x (Monovalent(x) -> Unfurl(x, joslyn))\nforall x (Unfurl(x, joslyn) -> Abjure(x, joslyn))\nforall x (Abjure(x, joslyn) -> Abjure(x, shurlock))\n\nnot Unfurl(shurlock, alphonso)\n\nnot Unfurl(shurlock, alphonso) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "The buddy is fleeceable. The buddy is rateable. The buddy hound the carroll. The buddy secernate the graham. The graham is velar. The graham defend the buddy. The graham hound the buddy. The graham hound the carroll. The graham secernate the buddy. The graham secernate the carroll. The carroll is velar. The carroll defend the graham. If something is rateable then it defend the carroll. If something defend the carroll then it secernate the carroll. If something secernate the carroll then it secernate the buddy. The buddy defend the buddy.", "logic": "\nFleeceable(buddy)\nRateable(buddy)\nHound(buddy, carroll)\nSecernate(buddy, graham)\nVelar(graham)\nDefend(graham, buddy)\nHound(graham, buddy)\nHound(graham, carroll)\nSecernate(graham, buddy)\nSecernate(graham, carroll)\nVelar(carroll)\nDefend(carroll, graham)\nforall x (Rateable(x) -> Defend(x, carroll))\nforall x (Defend(x, carroll) -> Secernate(x, carroll))\nforall x (Secernate(x, carroll) -> Secernate(x, buddy))\n\nDefend(buddy, buddy)\n\nDefend(buddy, buddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-710"} {"premises": "Clea is referable. Clea is uncordial. Clea is flustered. Clea is minimum. Clea is aired. Clea is foxy. Clea is nodding. Dolores is referable. Dolores is uncordial. Dolores is flustered. Dolores is minimum. Dolores is aired. Dolores is foxy. Dolores is nodding. Idaline is flustered. Idaline is minimum. If someone is foxy and uncordial then they are minimum. If someone is foxy then they are nodding. All foxy, aired people are flustered. Young people are minimum. Kind people are foxy. All nodding, foxy people are uncordial. Dolores is foxy.", "logic": "\nReferable(clea)\nUncordial(clea)\nFlustered(clea)\nMinimum(clea)\nAired(clea)\nFoxy(clea)\nNodding(clea)\nReferable(dolores)\nUncordial(dolores)\nFlustered(dolores)\nMinimum(dolores)\nAired(dolores)\nFoxy(dolores)\nNodding(dolores)\nFlustered(idaline)\nMinimum(idaline)\nforall x (Foxy(x) and Uncordial(x) -> Minimum(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> Nodding(x))\nforall x (Foxy(x) and Aired(x) -> Flustered(x))\nforall x (Nodding(x) -> Minimum(x))\nforall x (Minimum(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Nodding(x) and Foxy(x) -> Uncordial(x))\n\nFoxy(dolores)\n\ntherefore Foxy(dolores)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Chester is leftish. Chester is babylonian. Chester is first. Chester is spouting. Chester is firm. Chester is allopathic. Chester is unlettered. Garvin is leftish. Garvin is babylonian. Garvin is first. Garvin is spouting. Garvin is firm. Garvin is allopathic. Garvin is unlettered. Marcelo is first. Marcelo is spouting. If someone is allopathic and babylonian then they are spouting. If someone is allopathic then they are unlettered. All allopathic, firm people are first. Young people are spouting. Kind people are allopathic. All unlettered, allopathic people are babylonian. Garvin is not babylonian.", "logic": "\nLeftish(chester)\nBabylonian(chester)\nFirst(chester)\nSpouting(chester)\nFirm(chester)\nAllopathic(chester)\nUnlettered(chester)\nLeftish(garvin)\nBabylonian(garvin)\nFirst(garvin)\nSpouting(garvin)\nFirm(garvin)\nAllopathic(garvin)\nUnlettered(garvin)\nFirst(marcelo)\nSpouting(marcelo)\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Babylonian(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Unlettered(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) and Firm(x) -> First(x))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Allopathic(x))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) and Allopathic(x) -> Babylonian(x))\n\nnot Babylonian(garvin)\n\ntherefore Babylonian(garvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Miles is congealed. Miles is olden. Miles is ankylotic. Miles is biologic. Miles is fancy. Miles is lifted. Miles is amnestic. Marita is congealed. Marita is olden. Marita is ankylotic. Marita is biologic. Marita is fancy. Marita is lifted. Marita is amnestic. Rand is ankylotic. Rand is biologic. If someone is lifted and olden then they are biologic. If someone is lifted then they are amnestic. All lifted, fancy people are ankylotic. Young people are biologic. Kind people are lifted. All amnestic, lifted people are olden. Rand is lifted.", "logic": "\nCongealed(miles)\nOlden(miles)\nAnkylotic(miles)\nBiologic(miles)\nFancy(miles)\nLifted(miles)\nAmnestic(miles)\nCongealed(marita)\nOlden(marita)\nAnkylotic(marita)\nBiologic(marita)\nFancy(marita)\nLifted(marita)\nAmnestic(marita)\nAnkylotic(rand)\nBiologic(rand)\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Olden(x) -> Biologic(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) -> Amnestic(x))\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Fancy(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\nforall x (Amnestic(x) -> Biologic(x))\nforall x (Biologic(x) -> Lifted(x))\nforall x (Amnestic(x) and Lifted(x) -> Olden(x))\n\nLifted(rand)\n\nBiologic(rand) and forall x (Biologic(x) -> Lifted(x)) -> therefore Lifted(rand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Coraline is ownerless. Coraline is twelve. Coraline is telltale. Coraline is overarm. Coraline is towheaded. Coraline is apotropaic. Coraline is esoteric. Tonnie is ownerless. Tonnie is twelve. Tonnie is telltale. Tonnie is overarm. Tonnie is towheaded. Tonnie is apotropaic. Tonnie is esoteric. Luther is telltale. Luther is overarm. If someone is apotropaic and twelve then they are overarm. If someone is apotropaic then they are esoteric. All apotropaic, towheaded people are telltale. Young people are overarm. Kind people are apotropaic. All esoteric, apotropaic people are twelve. Luther is not apotropaic.", "logic": "\nOwnerless(coraline)\nTwelve(coraline)\nTelltale(coraline)\nOverarm(coraline)\nTowheaded(coraline)\nApotropaic(coraline)\nEsoteric(coraline)\nOwnerless(tonnie)\nTwelve(tonnie)\nTelltale(tonnie)\nOverarm(tonnie)\nTowheaded(tonnie)\nApotropaic(tonnie)\nEsoteric(tonnie)\nTelltale(luther)\nOverarm(luther)\nforall x (Apotropaic(x) and Twelve(x) -> Overarm(x))\nforall x (Apotropaic(x) -> Esoteric(x))\nforall x (Apotropaic(x) and Towheaded(x) -> Telltale(x))\nforall x (Esoteric(x) -> Overarm(x))\nforall x (Overarm(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\nforall x (Esoteric(x) and Apotropaic(x) -> Twelve(x))\n\nnot Apotropaic(luther)\n\nOverarm(luther) and forall x (Overarm(x) -> Apotropaic(x)) -> therefore Apotropaic(luther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Herrick is bigoted. Herrick is scalelike. Herrick is wriggly. Herrick is evidenced. Herrick is zymoid. Herrick is fragmental. Herrick is wroth. Gloriana is bigoted. Gloriana is scalelike. Gloriana is wriggly. Gloriana is evidenced. Gloriana is zymoid. Gloriana is fragmental. Gloriana is wroth. Rosanna is wriggly. Rosanna is evidenced. If someone is fragmental and scalelike then they are evidenced. If someone is fragmental then they are wroth. All fragmental, zymoid people are wriggly. Young people are evidenced. Kind people are fragmental. All wroth, fragmental people are scalelike. Rosanna is wroth.", "logic": "\nBigoted(herrick)\nScalelike(herrick)\nWriggly(herrick)\nEvidenced(herrick)\nZymoid(herrick)\nFragmental(herrick)\nWroth(herrick)\nBigoted(gloriana)\nScalelike(gloriana)\nWriggly(gloriana)\nEvidenced(gloriana)\nZymoid(gloriana)\nFragmental(gloriana)\nWroth(gloriana)\nWriggly(rosanna)\nEvidenced(rosanna)\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Evidenced(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) -> Wroth(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and Zymoid(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Wroth(x) -> Evidenced(x))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Wroth(x) and Fragmental(x) -> Scalelike(x))\n\nWroth(rosanna)\n\nEvidenced(rosanna) and forall x (Evidenced(x) -> Fragmental(x)) -> therefore Fragmental(rosanna) Fragmental(rosanna) and forall x (Fragmental(x) -> Wroth(x)) -> therefore Wroth(rosanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Anton is spick. Anton is mangy. Anton is geologic. Anton is dizzy. Anton is alterable. Anton is unsuitable. Anton is sharpened. Rod is spick. Rod is mangy. Rod is geologic. Rod is dizzy. Rod is alterable. Rod is unsuitable. Rod is sharpened. Brynna is geologic. Brynna is dizzy. If someone is unsuitable and mangy then they are dizzy. If someone is unsuitable then they are sharpened. All unsuitable, alterable people are geologic. Young people are dizzy. Kind people are unsuitable. All sharpened, unsuitable people are mangy. Brynna is not sharpened.", "logic": "\nSpick(anton)\nMangy(anton)\nGeologic(anton)\nDizzy(anton)\nAlterable(anton)\nUnsuitable(anton)\nSharpened(anton)\nSpick(rod)\nMangy(rod)\nGeologic(rod)\nDizzy(rod)\nAlterable(rod)\nUnsuitable(rod)\nSharpened(rod)\nGeologic(brynna)\nDizzy(brynna)\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) and Mangy(x) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Sharpened(x))\nforall x (Unsuitable(x) and Alterable(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Dizzy(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) and Unsuitable(x) -> Mangy(x))\n\nnot Sharpened(brynna)\n\nDizzy(brynna) and forall x (Dizzy(x) -> Unsuitable(x)) -> therefore Unsuitable(brynna) Unsuitable(brynna) and forall x (Unsuitable(x) -> Sharpened(x)) -> therefore Sharpened(brynna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Nicoli is busybodied. Nicoli is aberdonian. Nicoli is utilizable. Nicoli is airlike. Nicoli is alphameric. Nicoli is tubeless. Nicoli is steroidal. Reza is busybodied. Reza is aberdonian. Reza is utilizable. Reza is airlike. Reza is alphameric. Reza is tubeless. Reza is steroidal. Othilie is utilizable. Othilie is airlike. If someone is tubeless and aberdonian then they are airlike. If someone is tubeless then they are steroidal. All tubeless, alphameric people are utilizable. Young people are airlike. Kind people are tubeless. All steroidal, tubeless people are aberdonian. Othilie is aberdonian.", "logic": "\nBusybodied(nicoli)\nAberdonian(nicoli)\nUtilizable(nicoli)\nAirlike(nicoli)\nAlphameric(nicoli)\nTubeless(nicoli)\nSteroidal(nicoli)\nBusybodied(reza)\nAberdonian(reza)\nUtilizable(reza)\nAirlike(reza)\nAlphameric(reza)\nTubeless(reza)\nSteroidal(reza)\nUtilizable(othilie)\nAirlike(othilie)\nforall x (Tubeless(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Tubeless(x) -> Steroidal(x))\nforall x (Tubeless(x) and Alphameric(x) -> Utilizable(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Airlike(x) -> Tubeless(x))\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Tubeless(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\n\nAberdonian(othilie)\n\nAirlike(othilie) and forall x (Airlike(x) -> Tubeless(x)) -> therefore Tubeless(othilie) Tubeless(othilie) and forall x (Tubeless(x) -> Steroidal(x)) -> therefore Steroidal(othilie) Airlike(othilie) and forall x (Airlike(x) -> Tubeless(x)) -> therefore Tubeless(othilie) Steroidal(othilie) and Tubeless(othilie) and forall x (Steroidal(x) and Tubeless(x) -> Aberdonian(x)) -> therefore Aberdonian(othilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Obadias is unfair. Obadias is beardless. Obadias is hypoactive. Obadias is plausible. Obadias is crenate. Obadias is light. Obadias is unbelted. Annadiane is unfair. Annadiane is beardless. Annadiane is hypoactive. Annadiane is plausible. Annadiane is crenate. Annadiane is light. Annadiane is unbelted. Liane is hypoactive. Liane is plausible. If someone is light and beardless then they are plausible. If someone is light then they are unbelted. All light, crenate people are hypoactive. Young people are plausible. Kind people are light. All unbelted, light people are beardless. Liane is not beardless.", "logic": "\nUnfair(obadias)\nBeardless(obadias)\nHypoactive(obadias)\nPlausible(obadias)\nCrenate(obadias)\nLight(obadias)\nUnbelted(obadias)\nUnfair(annadiane)\nBeardless(annadiane)\nHypoactive(annadiane)\nPlausible(annadiane)\nCrenate(annadiane)\nLight(annadiane)\nUnbelted(annadiane)\nHypoactive(liane)\nPlausible(liane)\nforall x (Light(x) and Beardless(x) -> Plausible(x))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Unbelted(x))\nforall x (Light(x) and Crenate(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Unbelted(x) -> Plausible(x))\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Unbelted(x) and Light(x) -> Beardless(x))\n\nnot Beardless(liane)\n\nPlausible(liane) and forall x (Plausible(x) -> Light(x)) -> therefore Light(liane) Light(liane) and forall x (Light(x) -> Unbelted(x)) -> therefore Unbelted(liane) Plausible(liane) and forall x (Plausible(x) -> Light(x)) -> therefore Light(liane) Unbelted(liane) and Light(liane) and forall x (Unbelted(x) and Light(x) -> Beardless(x)) -> therefore Beardless(liane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Cornie is couthie. Cornie is warlike. Cornie is ringleted. Cornie is dilute. Cornie is childly. Cornie is egoistic. Cornie is unopened. Jobye is couthie. Jobye is warlike. Jobye is ringleted. Jobye is dilute. Jobye is childly. Jobye is egoistic. Jobye is unopened. Sheffy is ringleted. Sheffy is dilute. If someone is egoistic and warlike then they are dilute. If someone is egoistic then they are unopened. All egoistic, childly people are ringleted. Young people are dilute. Kind people are egoistic. All unopened, egoistic people are warlike. Sheffy is not couthie.", "logic": "\nCouthie(cornie)\nWarlike(cornie)\nRingleted(cornie)\nDilute(cornie)\nChildly(cornie)\nEgoistic(cornie)\nUnopened(cornie)\nCouthie(jobye)\nWarlike(jobye)\nRingleted(jobye)\nDilute(jobye)\nChildly(jobye)\nEgoistic(jobye)\nUnopened(jobye)\nRingleted(sheffy)\nDilute(sheffy)\nforall x (Egoistic(x) and Warlike(x) -> Dilute(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Unopened(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) and Childly(x) -> Ringleted(x))\nforall x (Unopened(x) -> Dilute(x))\nforall x (Dilute(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Unopened(x) and Egoistic(x) -> Warlike(x))\n\nnot Couthie(sheffy)\n\nnot Couthie(sheffy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Leonelle is gilbertian. Leonelle is divinatory. Leonelle is bosomed. Leonelle is soulful. Leonelle is climactic. Leonelle is improper. Leonelle is public. Archon is gilbertian. Archon is divinatory. Archon is bosomed. Archon is soulful. Archon is climactic. Archon is improper. Archon is public. Maryann is bosomed. Maryann is soulful. If someone is improper and divinatory then they are soulful. If someone is improper then they are public. All improper, climactic people are bosomed. Young people are soulful. Kind people are improper. All public, improper people are divinatory. Maryann is climactic.", "logic": "\nGilbertian(leonelle)\nDivinatory(leonelle)\nBosomed(leonelle)\nSoulful(leonelle)\nClimactic(leonelle)\nImproper(leonelle)\nPublic(leonelle)\nGilbertian(archon)\nDivinatory(archon)\nBosomed(archon)\nSoulful(archon)\nClimactic(archon)\nImproper(archon)\nPublic(archon)\nBosomed(maryann)\nSoulful(maryann)\nforall x (Improper(x) and Divinatory(x) -> Soulful(x))\nforall x (Improper(x) -> Public(x))\nforall x (Improper(x) and Climactic(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Public(x) -> Soulful(x))\nforall x (Soulful(x) -> Improper(x))\nforall x (Public(x) and Improper(x) -> Divinatory(x))\n\nClimactic(maryann)\n\nClimactic(maryann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-793"} {"premises": "Reina is consistent. Paula is not parental. Rochester is consistent. If something is steamed then it is consistent. If something is ungentle and not parental then it is reducible. If something is cramped then it is reducible. Quiet things are cramped. All parental, cramped things are ungentle. All parental things are ungentle. Big, steamed things are ungentle. If Reina is reducible and Reina is cramped then Reina is not steamed. Reina is consistent.", "logic": "\nConsistent(reina)\nnot Parental(paula)\nConsistent(rochester)\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Consistent(x))\nforall x (Ungentle(x) and not Parental(x) -> Reducible(x))\nforall x (Cramped(x) -> Reducible(x))\nforall x (Consistent(x) -> Cramped(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) and Cramped(x) -> Ungentle(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Ungentle(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) and Steamed(x) -> Ungentle(x))\nReducible(reina) and Cramped(reina) -> not Steamed(reina)\n\nConsistent(reina)\n\ntherefore Consistent(reina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Leonhard is glorious. Noach is not covered. Antonina is glorious. If something is referent then it is glorious. If something is bullying and not covered then it is diagonal. If something is hardy then it is diagonal. Quiet things are hardy. All covered, hardy things are bullying. All covered things are bullying. Big, referent things are bullying. If Leonhard is diagonal and Leonhard is hardy then Leonhard is not referent. Antonina is not glorious.", "logic": "\nGlorious(leonhard)\nnot Covered(noach)\nGlorious(antonina)\nforall x (Referent(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Bullying(x) and not Covered(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Hardy(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nforall x (Glorious(x) -> Hardy(x))\nforall x (Covered(x) and Hardy(x) -> Bullying(x))\nforall x (Covered(x) -> Bullying(x))\nforall x (Covered(x) and Referent(x) -> Bullying(x))\nDiagonal(leonhard) and Hardy(leonhard) -> not Referent(leonhard)\n\nnot Glorious(antonina)\n\ntherefore Glorious(antonina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Bidget is cavitied. Mervin is not earlier. Zaria is cavitied. If something is sweetish then it is cavitied. If something is incoherent and not earlier then it is vigilant. If something is ruddy then it is vigilant. Quiet things are ruddy. All earlier, ruddy things are incoherent. All earlier things are incoherent. Big, sweetish things are incoherent. If Bidget is vigilant and Bidget is ruddy then Bidget is not sweetish. Bidget is ruddy.", "logic": "\nCavitied(bidget)\nnot Earlier(mervin)\nCavitied(zaria)\nforall x (Sweetish(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Incoherent(x) and not Earlier(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Ruddy(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nforall x (Cavitied(x) -> Ruddy(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) and Ruddy(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) and Sweetish(x) -> Incoherent(x))\nVigilant(bidget) and Ruddy(bidget) -> not Sweetish(bidget)\n\nRuddy(bidget)\n\nCavitied(bidget) and forall x (Cavitied(x) -> Ruddy(x)) -> therefore Ruddy(bidget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Renell is solitary. Graig is not incognito. Bishop is solitary. If something is painful then it is solitary. If something is stygian and not incognito then it is anginose. If something is double then it is anginose. Quiet things are double. All incognito, double things are stygian. All incognito things are stygian. Big, painful things are stygian. If Renell is anginose and Renell is double then Renell is not painful. Renell is not double.", "logic": "\nSolitary(renell)\nnot Incognito(graig)\nSolitary(bishop)\nforall x (Painful(x) -> Solitary(x))\nforall x (Stygian(x) and not Incognito(x) -> Anginose(x))\nforall x (Double(x) -> Anginose(x))\nforall x (Solitary(x) -> Double(x))\nforall x (Incognito(x) and Double(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Incognito(x) -> Stygian(x))\nforall x (Incognito(x) and Painful(x) -> Stygian(x))\nAnginose(renell) and Double(renell) -> not Painful(renell)\n\nnot Double(renell)\n\nSolitary(renell) and forall x (Solitary(x) -> Double(x)) -> therefore Double(renell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Lynsey is cislunar. Naoma is not chlamydial. Lance is cislunar. If something is libellous then it is cislunar. If something is thirteenth and not chlamydial then it is alight. If something is melting then it is alight. Quiet things are melting. All chlamydial, melting things are thirteenth. All chlamydial things are thirteenth. Big, libellous things are thirteenth. If Lynsey is alight and Lynsey is melting then Lynsey is not libellous. Lance is alight.", "logic": "\nCislunar(lynsey)\nnot Chlamydial(naoma)\nCislunar(lance)\nforall x (Libellous(x) -> Cislunar(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and not Chlamydial(x) -> Alight(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Alight(x))\nforall x (Cislunar(x) -> Melting(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) and Melting(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) and Libellous(x) -> Thirteenth(x))\nAlight(lynsey) and Melting(lynsey) -> not Libellous(lynsey)\n\nAlight(lance)\n\nCislunar(lance) and forall x (Cislunar(x) -> Melting(x)) -> therefore Melting(lance) Melting(lance) and forall x (Melting(x) -> Alight(x)) -> therefore Alight(lance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Tybie is florentine. Tabbatha is not unedited. Rodrique is florentine. If something is homostylic then it is florentine. If something is avascular and not unedited then it is epitheliod. If something is abstruse then it is epitheliod. Quiet things are abstruse. All unedited, abstruse things are avascular. All unedited things are avascular. Big, homostylic things are avascular. If Tybie is epitheliod and Tybie is abstruse then Tybie is not homostylic. Rodrique is not epitheliod.", "logic": "\nFlorentine(tybie)\nnot Unedited(tabbatha)\nFlorentine(rodrique)\nforall x (Homostylic(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Avascular(x) and not Unedited(x) -> Epitheliod(x))\nforall x (Abstruse(x) -> Epitheliod(x))\nforall x (Florentine(x) -> Abstruse(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) and Abstruse(x) -> Avascular(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) -> Avascular(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) and Homostylic(x) -> Avascular(x))\nEpitheliod(tybie) and Abstruse(tybie) -> not Homostylic(tybie)\n\nnot Epitheliod(rodrique)\n\nFlorentine(rodrique) and forall x (Florentine(x) -> Abstruse(x)) -> therefore Abstruse(rodrique) Abstruse(rodrique) and forall x (Abstruse(x) -> Epitheliod(x)) -> therefore Epitheliod(rodrique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Clementia is vindictive. Xaviera is not converse. Marthena is vindictive. If something is assurgent then it is vindictive. If something is impetuous and not converse then it is quantized. If something is catalytic then it is quantized. Quiet things are catalytic. All converse, catalytic things are impetuous. All converse things are impetuous. Big, assurgent things are impetuous. If Clementia is quantized and Clementia is catalytic then Clementia is not assurgent. Clementia is not assurgent.", "logic": "\nVindictive(clementia)\nnot Converse(xaviera)\nVindictive(marthena)\nforall x (Assurgent(x) -> Vindictive(x))\nforall x (Impetuous(x) and not Converse(x) -> Quantized(x))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) -> Quantized(x))\nforall x (Vindictive(x) -> Catalytic(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) and Catalytic(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) and Assurgent(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nQuantized(clementia) and Catalytic(clementia) -> not Assurgent(clementia)\n\nnot Assurgent(clementia)\n\nVindictive(clementia) and forall x (Vindictive(x) -> Catalytic(x)) -> therefore Catalytic(clementia) Catalytic(clementia) and forall x (Catalytic(x) -> Quantized(x)) -> therefore Quantized(clementia) Vindictive(clementia) and forall x (Vindictive(x) -> Catalytic(x)) -> therefore Catalytic(clementia) Quantized(clementia) and Catalytic(clementia) and Quantized(clementia) and Catalytic(clementia) -> not Assurgent(clementia) -> therefore not Assurgent(clementia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Cilka is russian. Francis is not sinewy. Floris is russian. If something is coalescing then it is russian. If something is batrachian and not sinewy then it is lingulate. If something is dustlike then it is lingulate. Quiet things are dustlike. All sinewy, dustlike things are batrachian. All sinewy things are batrachian. Big, coalescing things are batrachian. If Cilka is lingulate and Cilka is dustlike then Cilka is not coalescing. Cilka is coalescing.", "logic": "\nRussian(cilka)\nnot Sinewy(francis)\nRussian(floris)\nforall x (Coalescing(x) -> Russian(x))\nforall x (Batrachian(x) and not Sinewy(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Dustlike(x) -> Lingulate(x))\nforall x (Russian(x) -> Dustlike(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Batrachian(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) -> Batrachian(x))\nforall x (Sinewy(x) and Coalescing(x) -> Batrachian(x))\nLingulate(cilka) and Dustlike(cilka) -> not Coalescing(cilka)\n\nCoalescing(cilka)\n\nRussian(cilka) and forall x (Russian(x) -> Dustlike(x)) -> therefore Dustlike(cilka) Dustlike(cilka) and forall x (Dustlike(x) -> Lingulate(x)) -> therefore Lingulate(cilka) Russian(cilka) and forall x (Russian(x) -> Dustlike(x)) -> therefore Dustlike(cilka) Lingulate(cilka) and Dustlike(cilka) and Lingulate(cilka) and Dustlike(cilka) -> not Coalescing(cilka) -> therefore not Coalescing(cilka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Caritta is briery. Angela is not inborn. Tamiko is briery. If something is oviform then it is briery. If something is jangly and not inborn then it is flowerless. If something is overhanded then it is flowerless. Quiet things are overhanded. All inborn, overhanded things are jangly. All inborn things are jangly. Big, oviform things are jangly. If Caritta is flowerless and Caritta is overhanded then Caritta is not oviform. Tamiko is not jangly.", "logic": "\nBriery(caritta)\nnot Inborn(angela)\nBriery(tamiko)\nforall x (Oviform(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Jangly(x) and not Inborn(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Overhanded(x) -> Flowerless(x))\nforall x (Briery(x) -> Overhanded(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) and Overhanded(x) -> Jangly(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) -> Jangly(x))\nforall x (Inborn(x) and Oviform(x) -> Jangly(x))\nFlowerless(caritta) and Overhanded(caritta) -> not Oviform(caritta)\n\nnot Jangly(tamiko)\n\nforall x (Inborn(x) and Overhanded(x) -> Jangly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Kandy is menopausal. Julee is not perdurable. Peta is menopausal. If something is pukka then it is menopausal. If something is subsidized and not perdurable then it is elating. If something is answerable then it is elating. Quiet things are answerable. All perdurable, answerable things are subsidized. All perdurable things are subsidized. Big, pukka things are subsidized. If Kandy is elating and Kandy is answerable then Kandy is not pukka. Julee is answerable.", "logic": "\nMenopausal(kandy)\nnot Perdurable(julee)\nMenopausal(peta)\nforall x (Pukka(x) -> Menopausal(x))\nforall x (Subsidized(x) and not Perdurable(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Answerable(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Menopausal(x) -> Answerable(x))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) and Answerable(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) and Pukka(x) -> Subsidized(x))\nElating(kandy) and Answerable(kandy) -> not Pukka(kandy)\n\nAnswerable(julee)\n\nforall x (Menopausal(x) -> Answerable(x)) <- forall x (Pukka(x) -> Menopausal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Gilberto is liquified. Cassandre is not understood. Dara is liquified. If something is isolated then it is liquified. If something is converted and not understood then it is calced. If something is occupied then it is calced. Quiet things are occupied. All understood, occupied things are converted. All understood things are converted. Big, isolated things are converted. If Gilberto is calced and Gilberto is occupied then Gilberto is not isolated. Gilberto is not converted.", "logic": "\nLiquified(gilberto)\nnot Understood(cassandre)\nLiquified(dara)\nforall x (Isolated(x) -> Liquified(x))\nforall x (Converted(x) and not Understood(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Liquified(x) -> Occupied(x))\nforall x (Understood(x) and Occupied(x) -> Converted(x))\nforall x (Understood(x) -> Converted(x))\nforall x (Understood(x) and Isolated(x) -> Converted(x))\nCalced(gilberto) and Occupied(gilberto) -> not Isolated(gilberto)\n\nnot Converted(gilberto)\n\nforall x (Understood(x) and Occupied(x) -> Converted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Tarrance is faraway. Lemar is not dominican. Ikey is faraway. If something is paltry then it is faraway. If something is emboldened and not dominican then it is clubbable. If something is unoriginal then it is clubbable. Quiet things are unoriginal. All dominican, unoriginal things are emboldened. All dominican things are emboldened. Big, paltry things are emboldened. If Tarrance is clubbable and Tarrance is unoriginal then Tarrance is not paltry. Lemar is faraway.", "logic": "\nFaraway(tarrance)\nnot Dominican(lemar)\nFaraway(ikey)\nforall x (Paltry(x) -> Faraway(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and not Dominican(x) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Unoriginal(x) -> Clubbable(x))\nforall x (Faraway(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nforall x (Dominican(x) and Unoriginal(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Dominican(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nforall x (Dominican(x) and Paltry(x) -> Emboldened(x))\nClubbable(tarrance) and Unoriginal(tarrance) -> not Paltry(tarrance)\n\nFaraway(lemar)\n\nforall x (Paltry(x) -> Faraway(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Marianne is smudgy. Tamra is not napped. Marlena is smudgy. If something is nisi then it is smudgy. If something is bedfast and not napped then it is abstracted. If something is leftover then it is abstracted. Quiet things are leftover. All napped, leftover things are bedfast. All napped things are bedfast. Big, nisi things are bedfast. If Marianne is abstracted and Marianne is leftover then Marianne is not nisi. Marlena is not red.", "logic": "\nSmudgy(marianne)\nnot Napped(tamra)\nSmudgy(marlena)\nforall x (Nisi(x) -> Smudgy(x))\nforall x (Bedfast(x) and not Napped(x) -> Abstracted(x))\nforall x (Leftover(x) -> Abstracted(x))\nforall x (Smudgy(x) -> Leftover(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) and Leftover(x) -> Bedfast(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) -> Bedfast(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) and Nisi(x) -> Bedfast(x))\nAbstracted(marianne) and Leftover(marianne) -> not Nisi(marianne)\n\nnot Red(marlena)\n\nnot Red(marlena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Monah is contrived. Lisbeth is not bifurcated. Shilpa is contrived. If something is annual then it is contrived. If something is rifled and not bifurcated then it is thracian. If something is repulsive then it is thracian. Quiet things are repulsive. All bifurcated, repulsive things are rifled. All bifurcated things are rifled. Big, annual things are rifled. If Monah is thracian and Monah is repulsive then Monah is not annual. Shilpa is bifurcated.", "logic": "\nContrived(monah)\nnot Bifurcated(lisbeth)\nContrived(shilpa)\nforall x (Annual(x) -> Contrived(x))\nforall x (Rifled(x) and not Bifurcated(x) -> Thracian(x))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) -> Thracian(x))\nforall x (Contrived(x) -> Repulsive(x))\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) and Repulsive(x) -> Rifled(x))\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) -> Rifled(x))\nforall x (Bifurcated(x) and Annual(x) -> Rifled(x))\nThracian(monah) and Repulsive(monah) -> not Annual(monah)\n\nBifurcated(shilpa)\n\nBifurcated(shilpa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Wilmette is liverish. Stepha is not resupine. Gennie is liverish. If something is shakeable then it is liverish. If something is unbooked and not resupine then it is unheeding. If something is biaxial then it is unheeding. Quiet things are biaxial. All resupine, biaxial things are unbooked. All resupine things are unbooked. Big, shakeable things are unbooked. If Wilmette is unheeding and Wilmette is biaxial then Wilmette is not shakeable. Gennie is not shakeable.", "logic": "\nLiverish(wilmette)\nnot Resupine(stepha)\nLiverish(gennie)\nforall x (Shakeable(x) -> Liverish(x))\nforall x (Unbooked(x) and not Resupine(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Liverish(x) -> Biaxial(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) and Biaxial(x) -> Unbooked(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) -> Unbooked(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) and Shakeable(x) -> Unbooked(x))\nUnheeding(wilmette) and Biaxial(wilmette) -> not Shakeable(wilmette)\n\nnot Shakeable(gennie)\n\nnot Shakeable(gennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "Berna is pathologic. Denyse is not corpulent. Vasili is pathologic. If something is minty then it is pathologic. If something is patronymic and not corpulent then it is untenable. If something is conjugal then it is untenable. Quiet things are conjugal. All corpulent, conjugal things are patronymic. All corpulent things are patronymic. Big, minty things are patronymic. If Berna is untenable and Berna is conjugal then Berna is not minty. Denyse is red.", "logic": "\nPathologic(berna)\nnot Corpulent(denyse)\nPathologic(vasili)\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Pathologic(x))\nforall x (Patronymic(x) and not Corpulent(x) -> Untenable(x))\nforall x (Conjugal(x) -> Untenable(x))\nforall x (Pathologic(x) -> Conjugal(x))\nforall x (Corpulent(x) and Conjugal(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Corpulent(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Corpulent(x) and Minty(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nUntenable(berna) and Conjugal(berna) -> not Minty(berna)\n\nRed(denyse)\n\nRed(denyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-59"} {"premises": "The cris is unsloped. The konrad reimburse the sidonnie. The konrad ensky the cris. The konrad ensky the sidonnie. The konrad is unsloped. The konrad retouch the cris. The fiorenze is unsweet. The sidonnie reimburse the konrad. The sidonnie is eucaryotic. The sidonnie is unsloped. If someone ensky the konrad and the konrad ensky the cris then the cris retouch the fiorenze. If someone reimburse the sidonnie then the sidonnie ensky the fiorenze. If someone ensky the fiorenze then they eat the konrad. If someone ensky the konrad then the konrad ensky the fiorenze. If someone is unwearying then they see the konrad. If the cris is unsloped and the cris ensky the fiorenze then the cris retouch the konrad. The sidonnie is unsloped.", "logic": "\nUnsloped(cris)\nReimburse(konrad, sidonnie)\nEnsky(konrad, cris)\nEnsky(konrad, sidonnie)\nUnsloped(konrad)\nRetouch(konrad, cris)\nUnsweet(fiorenze)\nReimburse(sidonnie, konrad)\nEucaryotic(sidonnie)\nUnsloped(sidonnie)\nforall x (Ensky(x, konrad) and Ensky(konrad, cris) -> Retouch(cris, fiorenze))\nforall x (Reimburse(x, sidonnie) -> Ensky(sidonnie, fiorenze))\nforall x (Ensky(x, fiorenze) -> Ensky(x, konrad))\nforall x (Ensky(x, konrad) -> Ensky(konrad, fiorenze))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) -> Retouch(x, konrad))\nUnsloped(cris) and Ensky(cris, fiorenze) -> Retouch(cris, konrad)\n\nUnsloped(sidonnie)\n\ntherefore Unsloped(sidonnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The keri is iatrogenic. The emelita azure the dianne. The emelita father the keri. The emelita father the dianne. The emelita is iatrogenic. The emelita perfuse the keri. The yacov is fossilized. The dianne azure the emelita. The dianne is erstwhile. The dianne is iatrogenic. If someone father the emelita and the emelita father the keri then the keri perfuse the yacov. If someone azure the dianne then the dianne father the yacov. If someone father the yacov then they eat the emelita. If someone father the emelita then the emelita father the yacov. If someone is depressing then they see the emelita. If the keri is iatrogenic and the keri father the yacov then the keri perfuse the emelita. The emelita does not eat the dianne.", "logic": "\nIatrogenic(keri)\nAzure(emelita, dianne)\nFather(emelita, keri)\nFather(emelita, dianne)\nIatrogenic(emelita)\nPerfuse(emelita, keri)\nFossilized(yacov)\nAzure(dianne, emelita)\nErstwhile(dianne)\nIatrogenic(dianne)\nforall x (Father(x, emelita) and Father(emelita, keri) -> Perfuse(keri, yacov))\nforall x (Azure(x, dianne) -> Father(dianne, yacov))\nforall x (Father(x, yacov) -> Father(x, emelita))\nforall x (Father(x, emelita) -> Father(emelita, yacov))\nforall x (Depressing(x) -> Perfuse(x, emelita))\nIatrogenic(keri) and Father(keri, yacov) -> Perfuse(keri, emelita)\n\nnot Father(emelita, dianne)\n\ntherefore Father(emelita, dianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The bessie is orgiastic. The adaline miss the mariya. The adaline overprice the bessie. The adaline overprice the mariya. The adaline is orgiastic. The adaline overlie the bessie. The corwin is stinting. The mariya miss the adaline. The mariya is nervy. The mariya is orgiastic. If someone overprice the adaline and the adaline overprice the bessie then the bessie overlie the corwin. If someone miss the mariya then the mariya overprice the corwin. If someone overprice the corwin then they eat the adaline. If someone overprice the adaline then the adaline overprice the corwin. If someone is burning then they see the adaline. If the bessie is orgiastic and the bessie overprice the corwin then the bessie overlie the adaline. The mariya overprice the corwin.", "logic": "\nOrgiastic(bessie)\nMiss(adaline, mariya)\nOverprice(adaline, bessie)\nOverprice(adaline, mariya)\nOrgiastic(adaline)\nOverlie(adaline, bessie)\nStinting(corwin)\nMiss(mariya, adaline)\nNervy(mariya)\nOrgiastic(mariya)\nforall x (Overprice(x, adaline) and Overprice(adaline, bessie) -> Overlie(bessie, corwin))\nforall x (Miss(x, mariya) -> Overprice(mariya, corwin))\nforall x (Overprice(x, corwin) -> Overprice(x, adaline))\nforall x (Overprice(x, adaline) -> Overprice(adaline, corwin))\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Overlie(x, adaline))\nOrgiastic(bessie) and Overprice(bessie, corwin) -> Overlie(bessie, adaline)\n\nOverprice(mariya, corwin)\n\nMiss(adaline, mariya) and forall x (Miss(x, mariya) -> Overprice(mariya, corwin)) -> therefore Overprice(mariya, corwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The lucian is hominian. The patrizia decant the anet. The patrizia dismantle the lucian. The patrizia dismantle the anet. The patrizia is hominian. The patrizia award the lucian. The cherise is shortened. The anet decant the patrizia. The anet is stated. The anet is hominian. If someone dismantle the patrizia and the patrizia dismantle the lucian then the lucian award the cherise. If someone decant the anet then the anet dismantle the cherise. If someone dismantle the cherise then they eat the patrizia. If someone dismantle the patrizia then the patrizia dismantle the cherise. If someone is brainless then they see the patrizia. If the lucian is hominian and the lucian dismantle the cherise then the lucian award the patrizia. The anet does not eat the cherise.", "logic": "\nHominian(lucian)\nDecant(patrizia, anet)\nDismantle(patrizia, lucian)\nDismantle(patrizia, anet)\nHominian(patrizia)\nAward(patrizia, lucian)\nShortened(cherise)\nDecant(anet, patrizia)\nStated(anet)\nHominian(anet)\nforall x (Dismantle(x, patrizia) and Dismantle(patrizia, lucian) -> Award(lucian, cherise))\nforall x (Decant(x, anet) -> Dismantle(anet, cherise))\nforall x (Dismantle(x, cherise) -> Dismantle(x, patrizia))\nforall x (Dismantle(x, patrizia) -> Dismantle(patrizia, cherise))\nforall x (Brainless(x) -> Award(x, patrizia))\nHominian(lucian) and Dismantle(lucian, cherise) -> Award(lucian, patrizia)\n\nnot Dismantle(anet, cherise)\n\nDecant(patrizia, anet) and forall x (Decant(x, anet) -> Dismantle(anet, cherise)) -> therefore Dismantle(anet, cherise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The pierrette is biogenic. The westbrook vitaminise the yetty. The westbrook piece the pierrette. The westbrook piece the yetty. The westbrook is biogenic. The westbrook brocade the pierrette. The shanie is crying. The yetty vitaminise the westbrook. The yetty is sizzling. The yetty is biogenic. If someone piece the westbrook and the westbrook piece the pierrette then the pierrette brocade the shanie. If someone vitaminise the yetty then the yetty piece the shanie. If someone piece the shanie then they eat the westbrook. If someone piece the westbrook then the westbrook piece the shanie. If someone is twilit then they see the westbrook. If the pierrette is biogenic and the pierrette piece the shanie then the pierrette brocade the westbrook. The yetty piece the westbrook.", "logic": "\nBiogenic(pierrette)\nVitaminise(westbrook, yetty)\nPiece(westbrook, pierrette)\nPiece(westbrook, yetty)\nBiogenic(westbrook)\nBrocade(westbrook, pierrette)\nCrying(shanie)\nVitaminise(yetty, westbrook)\nSizzling(yetty)\nBiogenic(yetty)\nforall x (Piece(x, westbrook) and Piece(westbrook, pierrette) -> Brocade(pierrette, shanie))\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, yetty) -> Piece(yetty, shanie))\nforall x (Piece(x, shanie) -> Piece(x, westbrook))\nforall x (Piece(x, westbrook) -> Piece(westbrook, shanie))\nforall x (Twilit(x) -> Brocade(x, westbrook))\nBiogenic(pierrette) and Piece(pierrette, shanie) -> Brocade(pierrette, westbrook)\n\nPiece(yetty, westbrook)\n\nVitaminise(westbrook, yetty) and forall x (Vitaminise(x, yetty) -> Piece(yetty, shanie)) -> therefore Piece(yetty, shanie) Piece(yetty, shanie) and forall x (Piece(x, shanie) -> Piece(x, westbrook)) -> therefore Piece(yetty, westbrook)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The madel is reedlike. The mia starch the malissia. The mia spank the madel. The mia spank the malissia. The mia is reedlike. The mia predigest the madel. The solly is unnamed. The malissia starch the mia. The malissia is squeaking. The malissia is reedlike. If someone spank the mia and the mia spank the madel then the madel predigest the solly. If someone starch the malissia then the malissia spank the solly. If someone spank the solly then they eat the mia. If someone spank the mia then the mia spank the solly. If someone is fogyish then they see the mia. If the madel is reedlike and the madel spank the solly then the madel predigest the mia. The malissia does not eat the mia.", "logic": "\nReedlike(madel)\nStarch(mia, malissia)\nSpank(mia, madel)\nSpank(mia, malissia)\nReedlike(mia)\nPredigest(mia, madel)\nUnnamed(solly)\nStarch(malissia, mia)\nSqueaking(malissia)\nReedlike(malissia)\nforall x (Spank(x, mia) and Spank(mia, madel) -> Predigest(madel, solly))\nforall x (Starch(x, malissia) -> Spank(malissia, solly))\nforall x (Spank(x, solly) -> Spank(x, mia))\nforall x (Spank(x, mia) -> Spank(mia, solly))\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> Predigest(x, mia))\nReedlike(madel) and Spank(madel, solly) -> Predigest(madel, mia)\n\nnot Spank(malissia, mia)\n\nStarch(mia, malissia) and forall x (Starch(x, malissia) -> Spank(malissia, solly)) -> therefore Spank(malissia, solly) Spank(malissia, solly) and forall x (Spank(x, solly) -> Spank(x, mia)) -> therefore Spank(malissia, mia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The dorella is superfine. The darien overleap the loree. The darien suffix the dorella. The darien suffix the loree. The darien is superfine. The darien overrun the dorella. The genia is bibulous. The loree overleap the darien. The loree is studious. The loree is superfine. If someone suffix the darien and the darien suffix the dorella then the dorella overrun the genia. If someone overleap the loree then the loree suffix the genia. If someone suffix the genia then they eat the darien. If someone suffix the darien then the darien suffix the genia. If someone is putrescent then they see the darien. If the dorella is superfine and the dorella suffix the genia then the dorella overrun the darien. The darien suffix the genia.", "logic": "\nSuperfine(dorella)\nOverleap(darien, loree)\nSuffix(darien, dorella)\nSuffix(darien, loree)\nSuperfine(darien)\nOverrun(darien, dorella)\nBibulous(genia)\nOverleap(loree, darien)\nStudious(loree)\nSuperfine(loree)\nforall x (Suffix(x, darien) and Suffix(darien, dorella) -> Overrun(dorella, genia))\nforall x (Overleap(x, loree) -> Suffix(loree, genia))\nforall x (Suffix(x, genia) -> Suffix(x, darien))\nforall x (Suffix(x, darien) -> Suffix(darien, genia))\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Overrun(x, darien))\nSuperfine(dorella) and Suffix(dorella, genia) -> Overrun(dorella, darien)\n\nSuffix(darien, genia)\n\nOverleap(darien, loree) and forall x (Overleap(x, loree) -> Suffix(loree, genia)) -> therefore Suffix(loree, genia) Suffix(loree, genia) and forall x (Suffix(x, genia) -> Suffix(x, darien)) -> therefore Suffix(loree, darien) Suffix(loree, darien) and forall x (Suffix(x, darien) -> Suffix(darien, genia)) -> therefore Suffix(darien, genia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The terina is shipboard. The raymundo criticize the leonardo. The raymundo palpitate the terina. The raymundo palpitate the leonardo. The raymundo is shipboard. The raymundo remainder the terina. The aleece is ilxxx. The leonardo criticize the raymundo. The leonardo is squeamish. The leonardo is shipboard. If someone palpitate the raymundo and the raymundo palpitate the terina then the terina remainder the aleece. If someone criticize the leonardo then the leonardo palpitate the aleece. If someone palpitate the aleece then they eat the raymundo. If someone palpitate the raymundo then the raymundo palpitate the aleece. If someone is unstressed then they see the raymundo. If the terina is shipboard and the terina palpitate the aleece then the terina remainder the raymundo. The raymundo does not eat the aleece.", "logic": "\nShipboard(terina)\nCriticize(raymundo, leonardo)\nPalpitate(raymundo, terina)\nPalpitate(raymundo, leonardo)\nShipboard(raymundo)\nRemainder(raymundo, terina)\nIlxxx(aleece)\nCriticize(leonardo, raymundo)\nSqueamish(leonardo)\nShipboard(leonardo)\nforall x (Palpitate(x, raymundo) and Palpitate(raymundo, terina) -> Remainder(terina, aleece))\nforall x (Criticize(x, leonardo) -> Palpitate(leonardo, aleece))\nforall x (Palpitate(x, aleece) -> Palpitate(x, raymundo))\nforall x (Palpitate(x, raymundo) -> Palpitate(raymundo, aleece))\nforall x (Unstressed(x) -> Remainder(x, raymundo))\nShipboard(terina) and Palpitate(terina, aleece) -> Remainder(terina, raymundo)\n\nnot Palpitate(raymundo, aleece)\n\nCriticize(raymundo, leonardo) and forall x (Criticize(x, leonardo) -> Palpitate(leonardo, aleece)) -> therefore Palpitate(leonardo, aleece) Palpitate(leonardo, aleece) and forall x (Palpitate(x, aleece) -> Palpitate(x, raymundo)) -> therefore Palpitate(leonardo, raymundo) Palpitate(leonardo, raymundo) and forall x (Palpitate(x, raymundo) -> Palpitate(raymundo, aleece)) -> therefore Palpitate(raymundo, aleece)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The chelton is augean. The yoshi polarise the roddy. The yoshi inunct the chelton. The yoshi inunct the roddy. The yoshi is augean. The yoshi destain the chelton. The marcio is strong. The roddy polarise the yoshi. The roddy is dazed. The roddy is augean. If someone inunct the yoshi and the yoshi inunct the chelton then the chelton destain the marcio. If someone polarise the roddy then the roddy inunct the marcio. If someone inunct the marcio then they eat the yoshi. If someone inunct the yoshi then the yoshi inunct the marcio. If someone is african then they see the yoshi. If the chelton is augean and the chelton inunct the marcio then the chelton destain the yoshi. The marcio does not see the yoshi.", "logic": "\nAugean(chelton)\nPolarise(yoshi, roddy)\nInunct(yoshi, chelton)\nInunct(yoshi, roddy)\nAugean(yoshi)\nDestain(yoshi, chelton)\nStrong(marcio)\nPolarise(roddy, yoshi)\nDazed(roddy)\nAugean(roddy)\nforall x (Inunct(x, yoshi) and Inunct(yoshi, chelton) -> Destain(chelton, marcio))\nforall x (Polarise(x, roddy) -> Inunct(roddy, marcio))\nforall x (Inunct(x, marcio) -> Inunct(x, yoshi))\nforall x (Inunct(x, yoshi) -> Inunct(yoshi, marcio))\nforall x (African(x) -> Destain(x, yoshi))\nAugean(chelton) and Inunct(chelton, marcio) -> Destain(chelton, yoshi)\n\nnot Destain(marcio, yoshi)\n\nforall x (African(x) -> Destain(x, yoshi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The sammie is tritanopic. The glynis popularise the kirsteni. The glynis overstate the sammie. The glynis overstate the kirsteni. The glynis is tritanopic. The glynis complot the sammie. The eva is ingrowing. The kirsteni popularise the glynis. The kirsteni is syphilitic. The kirsteni is tritanopic. If someone overstate the glynis and the glynis overstate the sammie then the sammie complot the eva. If someone popularise the kirsteni then the kirsteni overstate the eva. If someone overstate the eva then they eat the glynis. If someone overstate the glynis then the glynis overstate the eva. If someone is continual then they see the glynis. If the sammie is tritanopic and the sammie overstate the eva then the sammie complot the glynis. The eva overstate the glynis.", "logic": "\nTritanopic(sammie)\nPopularise(glynis, kirsteni)\nOverstate(glynis, sammie)\nOverstate(glynis, kirsteni)\nTritanopic(glynis)\nComplot(glynis, sammie)\nIngrowing(eva)\nPopularise(kirsteni, glynis)\nSyphilitic(kirsteni)\nTritanopic(kirsteni)\nforall x (Overstate(x, glynis) and Overstate(glynis, sammie) -> Complot(sammie, eva))\nforall x (Popularise(x, kirsteni) -> Overstate(kirsteni, eva))\nforall x (Overstate(x, eva) -> Overstate(x, glynis))\nforall x (Overstate(x, glynis) -> Overstate(glynis, eva))\nforall x (Continual(x) -> Complot(x, glynis))\nTritanopic(sammie) and Overstate(sammie, eva) -> Complot(sammie, glynis)\n\nOverstate(eva, glynis)\n\nforall x (Overstate(x, eva) -> Overstate(x, glynis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The genna is cautionary. The rickie desalinate the rudy. The rickie rubbish the genna. The rickie rubbish the rudy. The rickie is cautionary. The rickie sightread the genna. The shauna is unsocial. The rudy desalinate the rickie. The rudy is atomistic. The rudy is cautionary. If someone rubbish the rickie and the rickie rubbish the genna then the genna sightread the shauna. If someone desalinate the rudy then the rudy rubbish the shauna. If someone rubbish the shauna then they eat the rickie. If someone rubbish the rickie then the rickie rubbish the shauna. If someone is swell then they see the rickie. If the genna is cautionary and the genna rubbish the shauna then the genna sightread the rickie. The rickie does not see the rickie.", "logic": "\nCautionary(genna)\nDesalinate(rickie, rudy)\nRubbish(rickie, genna)\nRubbish(rickie, rudy)\nCautionary(rickie)\nSightread(rickie, genna)\nUnsocial(shauna)\nDesalinate(rudy, rickie)\nAtomistic(rudy)\nCautionary(rudy)\nforall x (Rubbish(x, rickie) and Rubbish(rickie, genna) -> Sightread(genna, shauna))\nforall x (Desalinate(x, rudy) -> Rubbish(rudy, shauna))\nforall x (Rubbish(x, shauna) -> Rubbish(x, rickie))\nforall x (Rubbish(x, rickie) -> Rubbish(rickie, shauna))\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Sightread(x, rickie))\nCautionary(genna) and Rubbish(genna, shauna) -> Sightread(genna, rickie)\n\nnot Sightread(rickie, rickie)\n\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Sightread(x, rickie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The tod is fattened. The jessy brazen the ceil. The jessy disallow the tod. The jessy disallow the ceil. The jessy is fattened. The jessy maximize the tod. The roda is anomic. The ceil brazen the jessy. The ceil is satiated. The ceil is fattened. If someone disallow the jessy and the jessy disallow the tod then the tod maximize the roda. If someone brazen the ceil then the ceil disallow the roda. If someone disallow the roda then they eat the jessy. If someone disallow the jessy then the jessy disallow the roda. If someone is prox then they see the jessy. If the tod is fattened and the tod disallow the roda then the tod maximize the jessy. The ceil maximize the jessy.", "logic": "\nFattened(tod)\nBrazen(jessy, ceil)\nDisallow(jessy, tod)\nDisallow(jessy, ceil)\nFattened(jessy)\nMaximize(jessy, tod)\nAnomic(roda)\nBrazen(ceil, jessy)\nSatiated(ceil)\nFattened(ceil)\nforall x (Disallow(x, jessy) and Disallow(jessy, tod) -> Maximize(tod, roda))\nforall x (Brazen(x, ceil) -> Disallow(ceil, roda))\nforall x (Disallow(x, roda) -> Disallow(x, jessy))\nforall x (Disallow(x, jessy) -> Disallow(jessy, roda))\nforall x (Prox(x) -> Maximize(x, jessy))\nFattened(tod) and Disallow(tod, roda) -> Maximize(tod, jessy)\n\nMaximize(ceil, jessy)\n\nforall x (Prox(x) -> Maximize(x, jessy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The lanette is adsorbate. The briteny inundate the kendre. The briteny frown the lanette. The briteny frown the kendre. The briteny is adsorbate. The briteny check the lanette. The hanson is mortifying. The kendre inundate the briteny. The kendre is cubistic. The kendre is adsorbate. If someone frown the briteny and the briteny frown the lanette then the lanette check the hanson. If someone inundate the kendre then the kendre frown the hanson. If someone frown the hanson then they eat the briteny. If someone frown the briteny then the briteny frown the hanson. If someone is omnivorous then they see the briteny. If the lanette is adsorbate and the lanette frown the hanson then the lanette check the briteny. The lanette is not mortifying.", "logic": "\nAdsorbate(lanette)\nInundate(briteny, kendre)\nFrown(briteny, lanette)\nFrown(briteny, kendre)\nAdsorbate(briteny)\nCheck(briteny, lanette)\nMortifying(hanson)\nInundate(kendre, briteny)\nCubistic(kendre)\nAdsorbate(kendre)\nforall x (Frown(x, briteny) and Frown(briteny, lanette) -> Check(lanette, hanson))\nforall x (Inundate(x, kendre) -> Frown(kendre, hanson))\nforall x (Frown(x, hanson) -> Frown(x, briteny))\nforall x (Frown(x, briteny) -> Frown(briteny, hanson))\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) -> Check(x, briteny))\nAdsorbate(lanette) and Frown(lanette, hanson) -> Check(lanette, briteny)\n\nnot Mortifying(lanette)\n\nnot Mortifying(lanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The allah is manifold. The antonetta swamp the sharron. The antonetta junk the allah. The antonetta junk the sharron. The antonetta is manifold. The antonetta wager the allah. The marit is habitual. The sharron swamp the antonetta. The sharron is demagogic. The sharron is manifold. If someone junk the antonetta and the antonetta junk the allah then the allah wager the marit. If someone swamp the sharron then the sharron junk the marit. If someone junk the marit then they eat the antonetta. If someone junk the antonetta then the antonetta junk the marit. If someone is pucka then they see the antonetta. If the allah is manifold and the allah junk the marit then the allah wager the antonetta. The marit is demagogic.", "logic": "\nManifold(allah)\nSwamp(antonetta, sharron)\nJunk(antonetta, allah)\nJunk(antonetta, sharron)\nManifold(antonetta)\nWager(antonetta, allah)\nHabitual(marit)\nSwamp(sharron, antonetta)\nDemagogic(sharron)\nManifold(sharron)\nforall x (Junk(x, antonetta) and Junk(antonetta, allah) -> Wager(allah, marit))\nforall x (Swamp(x, sharron) -> Junk(sharron, marit))\nforall x (Junk(x, marit) -> Junk(x, antonetta))\nforall x (Junk(x, antonetta) -> Junk(antonetta, marit))\nforall x (Pucka(x) -> Wager(x, antonetta))\nManifold(allah) and Junk(allah, marit) -> Wager(allah, antonetta)\n\nDemagogic(marit)\n\nDemagogic(marit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The anetta is hospitable. The chiquita utter the dyann. The chiquita birdwatch the anetta. The chiquita birdwatch the dyann. The chiquita is hospitable. The chiquita brine the anetta. The carlotta is galled. The dyann utter the chiquita. The dyann is lacerate. The dyann is hospitable. If someone birdwatch the chiquita and the chiquita birdwatch the anetta then the anetta brine the carlotta. If someone utter the dyann then the dyann birdwatch the carlotta. If someone birdwatch the carlotta then they eat the chiquita. If someone birdwatch the chiquita then the chiquita birdwatch the carlotta. If someone is abomasal then they see the chiquita. If the anetta is hospitable and the anetta birdwatch the carlotta then the anetta brine the chiquita. The chiquita does not chase the chiquita.", "logic": "\nHospitable(anetta)\nUtter(chiquita, dyann)\nBirdwatch(chiquita, anetta)\nBirdwatch(chiquita, dyann)\nHospitable(chiquita)\nBrine(chiquita, anetta)\nGalled(carlotta)\nUtter(dyann, chiquita)\nLacerate(dyann)\nHospitable(dyann)\nforall x (Birdwatch(x, chiquita) and Birdwatch(chiquita, anetta) -> Brine(anetta, carlotta))\nforall x (Utter(x, dyann) -> Birdwatch(dyann, carlotta))\nforall x (Birdwatch(x, carlotta) -> Birdwatch(x, chiquita))\nforall x (Birdwatch(x, chiquita) -> Birdwatch(chiquita, carlotta))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Brine(x, chiquita))\nHospitable(anetta) and Birdwatch(anetta, carlotta) -> Brine(anetta, chiquita)\n\nnot Utter(chiquita, chiquita)\n\nnot Utter(chiquita, chiquita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The mellissa is bulbaceous. The winnah bloviate the adoree. The winnah assibilate the mellissa. The winnah assibilate the adoree. The winnah is bulbaceous. The winnah disappear the mellissa. The blakelee is untapped. The adoree bloviate the winnah. The adoree is accumbent. The adoree is bulbaceous. If someone assibilate the winnah and the winnah assibilate the mellissa then the mellissa disappear the blakelee. If someone bloviate the adoree then the adoree assibilate the blakelee. If someone assibilate the blakelee then they eat the winnah. If someone assibilate the winnah then the winnah assibilate the blakelee. If someone is supplicant then they see the winnah. If the mellissa is bulbaceous and the mellissa assibilate the blakelee then the mellissa disappear the winnah. The mellissa bloviate the adoree.", "logic": "\nBulbaceous(mellissa)\nBloviate(winnah, adoree)\nAssibilate(winnah, mellissa)\nAssibilate(winnah, adoree)\nBulbaceous(winnah)\nDisappear(winnah, mellissa)\nUntapped(blakelee)\nBloviate(adoree, winnah)\nAccumbent(adoree)\nBulbaceous(adoree)\nforall x (Assibilate(x, winnah) and Assibilate(winnah, mellissa) -> Disappear(mellissa, blakelee))\nforall x (Bloviate(x, adoree) -> Assibilate(adoree, blakelee))\nforall x (Assibilate(x, blakelee) -> Assibilate(x, winnah))\nforall x (Assibilate(x, winnah) -> Assibilate(winnah, blakelee))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) -> Disappear(x, winnah))\nBulbaceous(mellissa) and Assibilate(mellissa, blakelee) -> Disappear(mellissa, winnah)\n\nBloviate(mellissa, adoree)\n\nBloviate(mellissa, adoree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1580"} {"premises": "The stanton spearhead the kostas. The stanton spearhead the clemence. The stanton accredit the henka. The kostas is busy. The kostas is vagrant. The kostas is squint. The henka freelance the clemence. The henka spearhead the kostas. The henka accredit the stanton. The clemence is busy. The clemence freelance the kostas. The clemence freelance the henka. If something accredit the henka and the henka freelance the kostas then it is busy. If something accredit the stanton then it is vagrant. If something spearhead the clemence and it accredit the henka then it is duncish. If something is squint and it spearhead the stanton then it freelance the kostas. If something spearhead the kostas then it freelance the stanton. If the henka spearhead the kostas then the henka is duncish. If the henka freelance the kostas then the henka is vagrant. If something is vagrant then it freelance the kostas. The clemence is busy.", "logic": "\nSpearhead(stanton, kostas)\nSpearhead(stanton, clemence)\nAccredit(stanton, henka)\nBusy(kostas)\nVagrant(kostas)\nSquint(kostas)\nFreelance(henka, clemence)\nSpearhead(henka, kostas)\nAccredit(henka, stanton)\nBusy(clemence)\nFreelance(clemence, kostas)\nFreelance(clemence, henka)\nforall x (Accredit(x, henka) and Freelance(henka, kostas) -> Busy(x))\nforall x (Accredit(x, stanton) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Spearhead(x, clemence) and Accredit(x, henka) -> Duncish(x))\nforall x (Squint(x) and Spearhead(x, stanton) -> Freelance(x, kostas))\nforall x (Spearhead(x, kostas) -> Freelance(x, stanton))\nSpearhead(henka, kostas) -> Duncish(henka)\nFreelance(henka, kostas) -> Vagrant(henka)\nforall x (Vagrant(x) -> Freelance(x, kostas))\n\nBusy(clemence)\n\ntherefore Busy(clemence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The abner moderate the romy. The abner moderate the patsy. The abner equip the maryanne. The romy is titanic. The romy is chivalrous. The romy is facile. The maryanne yank the patsy. The maryanne moderate the romy. The maryanne equip the abner. The patsy is titanic. The patsy yank the romy. The patsy yank the maryanne. If something equip the maryanne and the maryanne yank the romy then it is titanic. If something equip the abner then it is chivalrous. If something moderate the patsy and it equip the maryanne then it is calyceal. If something is facile and it moderate the abner then it yank the romy. If something moderate the romy then it yank the abner. If the maryanne moderate the romy then the maryanne is calyceal. If the maryanne yank the romy then the maryanne is chivalrous. If something is chivalrous then it yank the romy. The abner does not need the patsy.", "logic": "\nModerate(abner, romy)\nModerate(abner, patsy)\nEquip(abner, maryanne)\nTitanic(romy)\nChivalrous(romy)\nFacile(romy)\nYank(maryanne, patsy)\nModerate(maryanne, romy)\nEquip(maryanne, abner)\nTitanic(patsy)\nYank(patsy, romy)\nYank(patsy, maryanne)\nforall x (Equip(x, maryanne) and Yank(maryanne, romy) -> Titanic(x))\nforall x (Equip(x, abner) -> Chivalrous(x))\nforall x (Moderate(x, patsy) and Equip(x, maryanne) -> Calyceal(x))\nforall x (Facile(x) and Moderate(x, abner) -> Yank(x, romy))\nforall x (Moderate(x, romy) -> Yank(x, abner))\nModerate(maryanne, romy) -> Calyceal(maryanne)\nYank(maryanne, romy) -> Chivalrous(maryanne)\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) -> Yank(x, romy))\n\nnot Moderate(abner, patsy)\n\ntherefore Moderate(abner, patsy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The hyatt audition the wayland. The hyatt audition the kim. The hyatt gravitate the dian. The wayland is carotid. The wayland is scurrying. The wayland is mousy. The dian backbite the kim. The dian audition the wayland. The dian gravitate the hyatt. The kim is carotid. The kim backbite the wayland. The kim backbite the dian. If something gravitate the dian and the dian backbite the wayland then it is carotid. If something gravitate the hyatt then it is scurrying. If something audition the kim and it gravitate the dian then it is unstuck. If something is mousy and it audition the hyatt then it backbite the wayland. If something audition the wayland then it backbite the hyatt. If the dian audition the wayland then the dian is unstuck. If the dian backbite the wayland then the dian is scurrying. If something is scurrying then it backbite the wayland. The wayland backbite the wayland.", "logic": "\nAudition(hyatt, wayland)\nAudition(hyatt, kim)\nGravitate(hyatt, dian)\nCarotid(wayland)\nScurrying(wayland)\nMousy(wayland)\nBackbite(dian, kim)\nAudition(dian, wayland)\nGravitate(dian, hyatt)\nCarotid(kim)\nBackbite(kim, wayland)\nBackbite(kim, dian)\nforall x (Gravitate(x, dian) and Backbite(dian, wayland) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Gravitate(x, hyatt) -> Scurrying(x))\nforall x (Audition(x, kim) and Gravitate(x, dian) -> Unstuck(x))\nforall x (Mousy(x) and Audition(x, hyatt) -> Backbite(x, wayland))\nforall x (Audition(x, wayland) -> Backbite(x, hyatt))\nAudition(dian, wayland) -> Unstuck(dian)\nBackbite(dian, wayland) -> Scurrying(dian)\nforall x (Scurrying(x) -> Backbite(x, wayland))\n\nBackbite(wayland, wayland)\n\nScurrying(wayland) and forall x (Scurrying(x) -> Backbite(x, wayland)) -> therefore Backbite(wayland, wayland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The bernd glitter the star. The bernd glitter the agna. The bernd prolong the marijo. The star is trabeated. The star is carolean. The star is monestrous. The marijo perspire the agna. The marijo glitter the star. The marijo prolong the bernd. The agna is trabeated. The agna perspire the star. The agna perspire the marijo. If something prolong the marijo and the marijo perspire the star then it is trabeated. If something prolong the bernd then it is carolean. If something glitter the agna and it prolong the marijo then it is bumptious. If something is monestrous and it glitter the bernd then it perspire the star. If something glitter the star then it perspire the bernd. If the marijo glitter the star then the marijo is bumptious. If the marijo perspire the star then the marijo is carolean. If something is carolean then it perspire the star. The marijo is not carolean.", "logic": "\nGlitter(bernd, star)\nGlitter(bernd, agna)\nProlong(bernd, marijo)\nTrabeated(star)\nCarolean(star)\nMonestrous(star)\nPerspire(marijo, agna)\nGlitter(marijo, star)\nProlong(marijo, bernd)\nTrabeated(agna)\nPerspire(agna, star)\nPerspire(agna, marijo)\nforall x (Prolong(x, marijo) and Perspire(marijo, star) -> Trabeated(x))\nforall x (Prolong(x, bernd) -> Carolean(x))\nforall x (Glitter(x, agna) and Prolong(x, marijo) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Monestrous(x) and Glitter(x, bernd) -> Perspire(x, star))\nforall x (Glitter(x, star) -> Perspire(x, bernd))\nGlitter(marijo, star) -> Bumptious(marijo)\nPerspire(marijo, star) -> Carolean(marijo)\nforall x (Carolean(x) -> Perspire(x, star))\n\nnot Carolean(marijo)\n\nProlong(marijo, bernd) and forall x (Prolong(x, bernd) -> Carolean(x)) -> therefore Carolean(marijo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The larry frazzle the juliana. The larry frazzle the traver. The larry spear the simmonds. The juliana is rectal. The juliana is dapper. The juliana is tapestried. The simmonds labour the traver. The simmonds frazzle the juliana. The simmonds spear the larry. The traver is rectal. The traver labour the juliana. The traver labour the simmonds. If something spear the simmonds and the simmonds labour the juliana then it is rectal. If something spear the larry then it is dapper. If something frazzle the traver and it spear the simmonds then it is bias. If something is tapestried and it frazzle the larry then it labour the juliana. If something frazzle the juliana then it labour the larry. If the simmonds frazzle the juliana then the simmonds is bias. If the simmonds labour the juliana then the simmonds is dapper. If something is dapper then it labour the juliana. The simmonds labour the juliana.", "logic": "\nFrazzle(larry, juliana)\nFrazzle(larry, traver)\nSpear(larry, simmonds)\nRectal(juliana)\nDapper(juliana)\nTapestried(juliana)\nLabour(simmonds, traver)\nFrazzle(simmonds, juliana)\nSpear(simmonds, larry)\nRectal(traver)\nLabour(traver, juliana)\nLabour(traver, simmonds)\nforall x (Spear(x, simmonds) and Labour(simmonds, juliana) -> Rectal(x))\nforall x (Spear(x, larry) -> Dapper(x))\nforall x (Frazzle(x, traver) and Spear(x, simmonds) -> Bias(x))\nforall x (Tapestried(x) and Frazzle(x, larry) -> Labour(x, juliana))\nforall x (Frazzle(x, juliana) -> Labour(x, larry))\nFrazzle(simmonds, juliana) -> Bias(simmonds)\nLabour(simmonds, juliana) -> Dapper(simmonds)\nforall x (Dapper(x) -> Labour(x, juliana))\n\nLabour(simmonds, juliana)\n\nSpear(simmonds, larry) and forall x (Spear(x, larry) -> Dapper(x)) -> therefore Dapper(simmonds) Dapper(simmonds) and forall x (Dapper(x) -> Labour(x, juliana)) -> therefore Labour(simmonds, juliana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The mandy malnourish the mose. The mandy malnourish the gilberte. The mandy quintuple the mamie. The mose is frowning. The mose is capsulate. The mose is resonant. The mamie deracinate the gilberte. The mamie malnourish the mose. The mamie quintuple the mandy. The gilberte is frowning. The gilberte deracinate the mose. The gilberte deracinate the mamie. If something quintuple the mamie and the mamie deracinate the mose then it is frowning. If something quintuple the mandy then it is capsulate. If something malnourish the gilberte and it quintuple the mamie then it is mired. If something is resonant and it malnourish the mandy then it deracinate the mose. If something malnourish the mose then it deracinate the mandy. If the mamie malnourish the mose then the mamie is mired. If the mamie deracinate the mose then the mamie is capsulate. If something is capsulate then it deracinate the mose. The mamie does not like the mose.", "logic": "\nMalnourish(mandy, mose)\nMalnourish(mandy, gilberte)\nQuintuple(mandy, mamie)\nFrowning(mose)\nCapsulate(mose)\nResonant(mose)\nDeracinate(mamie, gilberte)\nMalnourish(mamie, mose)\nQuintuple(mamie, mandy)\nFrowning(gilberte)\nDeracinate(gilberte, mose)\nDeracinate(gilberte, mamie)\nforall x (Quintuple(x, mamie) and Deracinate(mamie, mose) -> Frowning(x))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, mandy) -> Capsulate(x))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, gilberte) and Quintuple(x, mamie) -> Mired(x))\nforall x (Resonant(x) and Malnourish(x, mandy) -> Deracinate(x, mose))\nforall x (Malnourish(x, mose) -> Deracinate(x, mandy))\nMalnourish(mamie, mose) -> Mired(mamie)\nDeracinate(mamie, mose) -> Capsulate(mamie)\nforall x (Capsulate(x) -> Deracinate(x, mose))\n\nnot Deracinate(mamie, mose)\n\nQuintuple(mamie, mandy) and forall x (Quintuple(x, mandy) -> Capsulate(x)) -> therefore Capsulate(mamie) Capsulate(mamie) and forall x (Capsulate(x) -> Deracinate(x, mose)) -> therefore Deracinate(mamie, mose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The bekki spend the iolande. The bekki spend the arlina. The bekki denitrify the sharla. The iolande is detestable. The iolande is layered. The iolande is billowy. The sharla best the arlina. The sharla spend the iolande. The sharla denitrify the bekki. The arlina is detestable. The arlina best the iolande. The arlina best the sharla. If something denitrify the sharla and the sharla best the iolande then it is detestable. If something denitrify the bekki then it is layered. If something spend the arlina and it denitrify the sharla then it is pervious. If something is billowy and it spend the bekki then it best the iolande. If something spend the iolande then it best the bekki. If the sharla spend the iolande then the sharla is pervious. If the sharla best the iolande then the sharla is layered. If something is layered then it best the iolande. The bekki is detestable.", "logic": "\nSpend(bekki, iolande)\nSpend(bekki, arlina)\nDenitrify(bekki, sharla)\nDetestable(iolande)\nLayered(iolande)\nBillowy(iolande)\nBest(sharla, arlina)\nSpend(sharla, iolande)\nDenitrify(sharla, bekki)\nDetestable(arlina)\nBest(arlina, iolande)\nBest(arlina, sharla)\nforall x (Denitrify(x, sharla) and Best(sharla, iolande) -> Detestable(x))\nforall x (Denitrify(x, bekki) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Spend(x, arlina) and Denitrify(x, sharla) -> Pervious(x))\nforall x (Billowy(x) and Spend(x, bekki) -> Best(x, iolande))\nforall x (Spend(x, iolande) -> Best(x, bekki))\nSpend(sharla, iolande) -> Pervious(sharla)\nBest(sharla, iolande) -> Layered(sharla)\nforall x (Layered(x) -> Best(x, iolande))\n\nDetestable(bekki)\n\nDenitrify(sharla, bekki) and forall x (Denitrify(x, bekki) -> Layered(x)) -> therefore Layered(sharla) Layered(sharla) and forall x (Layered(x) -> Best(x, iolande)) -> therefore Best(sharla, iolande) Denitrify(bekki, sharla) and Best(sharla, iolande) and forall x (Denitrify(x, sharla) and Best(sharla, iolande) -> Detestable(x)) -> therefore Detestable(bekki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The shena escallop the martino. The shena escallop the constance. The shena fancify the ajai. The martino is scorched. The martino is toothsome. The martino is summative. The ajai garden the constance. The ajai escallop the martino. The ajai fancify the shena. The constance is scorched. The constance garden the martino. The constance garden the ajai. If something fancify the ajai and the ajai garden the martino then it is scorched. If something fancify the shena then it is toothsome. If something escallop the constance and it fancify the ajai then it is narcotic. If something is summative and it escallop the shena then it garden the martino. If something escallop the martino then it garden the shena. If the ajai escallop the martino then the ajai is narcotic. If the ajai garden the martino then the ajai is toothsome. If something is toothsome then it garden the martino. The shena is not scorched.", "logic": "\nEscallop(shena, martino)\nEscallop(shena, constance)\nFancify(shena, ajai)\nScorched(martino)\nToothsome(martino)\nSummative(martino)\nGarden(ajai, constance)\nEscallop(ajai, martino)\nFancify(ajai, shena)\nScorched(constance)\nGarden(constance, martino)\nGarden(constance, ajai)\nforall x (Fancify(x, ajai) and Garden(ajai, martino) -> Scorched(x))\nforall x (Fancify(x, shena) -> Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Escallop(x, constance) and Fancify(x, ajai) -> Narcotic(x))\nforall x (Summative(x) and Escallop(x, shena) -> Garden(x, martino))\nforall x (Escallop(x, martino) -> Garden(x, shena))\nEscallop(ajai, martino) -> Narcotic(ajai)\nGarden(ajai, martino) -> Toothsome(ajai)\nforall x (Toothsome(x) -> Garden(x, martino))\n\nnot Scorched(shena)\n\nFancify(ajai, shena) and forall x (Fancify(x, shena) -> Toothsome(x)) -> therefore Toothsome(ajai) Toothsome(ajai) and forall x (Toothsome(x) -> Garden(x, martino)) -> therefore Garden(ajai, martino) Fancify(shena, ajai) and Garden(ajai, martino) and forall x (Fancify(x, ajai) and Garden(ajai, martino) -> Scorched(x)) -> therefore Scorched(shena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The rachael repair the charley. The rachael repair the lust. The rachael draggle the vitia. The charley is figurative. The charley is wearing. The charley is antlered. The vitia untangle the lust. The vitia repair the charley. The vitia draggle the rachael. The lust is figurative. The lust untangle the charley. The lust untangle the vitia. If something draggle the vitia and the vitia untangle the charley then it is figurative. If something draggle the rachael then it is wearing. If something repair the lust and it draggle the vitia then it is uninvolved. If something is antlered and it repair the rachael then it untangle the charley. If something repair the charley then it untangle the rachael. If the vitia repair the charley then the vitia is uninvolved. If the vitia untangle the charley then the vitia is wearing. If something is wearing then it untangle the charley. The lust is not uninvolved.", "logic": "\nRepair(rachael, charley)\nRepair(rachael, lust)\nDraggle(rachael, vitia)\nFigurative(charley)\nWearing(charley)\nAntlered(charley)\nUntangle(vitia, lust)\nRepair(vitia, charley)\nDraggle(vitia, rachael)\nFigurative(lust)\nUntangle(lust, charley)\nUntangle(lust, vitia)\nforall x (Draggle(x, vitia) and Untangle(vitia, charley) -> Figurative(x))\nforall x (Draggle(x, rachael) -> Wearing(x))\nforall x (Repair(x, lust) and Draggle(x, vitia) -> Uninvolved(x))\nforall x (Antlered(x) and Repair(x, rachael) -> Untangle(x, charley))\nforall x (Repair(x, charley) -> Untangle(x, rachael))\nRepair(vitia, charley) -> Uninvolved(vitia)\nUntangle(vitia, charley) -> Wearing(vitia)\nforall x (Wearing(x) -> Untangle(x, charley))\n\nnot Uninvolved(lust)\n\nforall x (Repair(x, lust) and Draggle(x, vitia) -> Uninvolved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The susan erode the odetta. The susan erode the zippy. The susan stereotype the fabrice. The odetta is comforting. The odetta is religious. The odetta is garmented. The fabrice collate the zippy. The fabrice erode the odetta. The fabrice stereotype the susan. The zippy is comforting. The zippy collate the odetta. The zippy collate the fabrice. If something stereotype the fabrice and the fabrice collate the odetta then it is comforting. If something stereotype the susan then it is religious. If something erode the zippy and it stereotype the fabrice then it is vermicular. If something is garmented and it erode the susan then it collate the odetta. If something erode the odetta then it collate the susan. If the fabrice erode the odetta then the fabrice is vermicular. If the fabrice collate the odetta then the fabrice is religious. If something is religious then it collate the odetta. The fabrice is comforting.", "logic": "\nErode(susan, odetta)\nErode(susan, zippy)\nStereotype(susan, fabrice)\nComforting(odetta)\nReligious(odetta)\nGarmented(odetta)\nCollate(fabrice, zippy)\nErode(fabrice, odetta)\nStereotype(fabrice, susan)\nComforting(zippy)\nCollate(zippy, odetta)\nCollate(zippy, fabrice)\nforall x (Stereotype(x, fabrice) and Collate(fabrice, odetta) -> Comforting(x))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, susan) -> Religious(x))\nforall x (Erode(x, zippy) and Stereotype(x, fabrice) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Garmented(x) and Erode(x, susan) -> Collate(x, odetta))\nforall x (Erode(x, odetta) -> Collate(x, susan))\nErode(fabrice, odetta) -> Vermicular(fabrice)\nCollate(fabrice, odetta) -> Religious(fabrice)\nforall x (Religious(x) -> Collate(x, odetta))\n\nComforting(fabrice)\n\nforall x (Stereotype(x, fabrice) and Collate(fabrice, odetta) -> Comforting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The hercules bake the amandie. The hercules bake the neal. The hercules flaw the skipp. The amandie is impudent. The amandie is orientated. The amandie is urogenital. The skipp emancipate the neal. The skipp bake the amandie. The skipp flaw the hercules. The neal is impudent. The neal emancipate the amandie. The neal emancipate the skipp. If something flaw the skipp and the skipp emancipate the amandie then it is impudent. If something flaw the hercules then it is orientated. If something bake the neal and it flaw the skipp then it is blunt. If something is urogenital and it bake the hercules then it emancipate the amandie. If something bake the amandie then it emancipate the hercules. If the skipp bake the amandie then the skipp is blunt. If the skipp emancipate the amandie then the skipp is orientated. If something is orientated then it emancipate the amandie. The neal is not orientated.", "logic": "\nBake(hercules, amandie)\nBake(hercules, neal)\nFlaw(hercules, skipp)\nImpudent(amandie)\nOrientated(amandie)\nUrogenital(amandie)\nEmancipate(skipp, neal)\nBake(skipp, amandie)\nFlaw(skipp, hercules)\nImpudent(neal)\nEmancipate(neal, amandie)\nEmancipate(neal, skipp)\nforall x (Flaw(x, skipp) and Emancipate(skipp, amandie) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Flaw(x, hercules) -> Orientated(x))\nforall x (Bake(x, neal) and Flaw(x, skipp) -> Blunt(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) and Bake(x, hercules) -> Emancipate(x, amandie))\nforall x (Bake(x, amandie) -> Emancipate(x, hercules))\nBake(skipp, amandie) -> Blunt(skipp)\nEmancipate(skipp, amandie) -> Orientated(skipp)\nforall x (Orientated(x) -> Emancipate(x, amandie))\n\nnot Orientated(neal)\n\nforall x (Flaw(x, hercules) -> Orientated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The selia wham the darrin. The selia wham the josiah. The selia rupture the quinton. The darrin is bayesian. The darrin is meaning. The darrin is undetected. The quinton wrest the josiah. The quinton wham the darrin. The quinton rupture the selia. The josiah is bayesian. The josiah wrest the darrin. The josiah wrest the quinton. If something rupture the quinton and the quinton wrest the darrin then it is bayesian. If something rupture the selia then it is meaning. If something wham the josiah and it rupture the quinton then it is tatty. If something is undetected and it wham the selia then it wrest the darrin. If something wham the darrin then it wrest the selia. If the quinton wham the darrin then the quinton is tatty. If the quinton wrest the darrin then the quinton is meaning. If something is meaning then it wrest the darrin. The selia wrest the darrin.", "logic": "\nWham(selia, darrin)\nWham(selia, josiah)\nRupture(selia, quinton)\nBayesian(darrin)\nMeaning(darrin)\nUndetected(darrin)\nWrest(quinton, josiah)\nWham(quinton, darrin)\nRupture(quinton, selia)\nBayesian(josiah)\nWrest(josiah, darrin)\nWrest(josiah, quinton)\nforall x (Rupture(x, quinton) and Wrest(quinton, darrin) -> Bayesian(x))\nforall x (Rupture(x, selia) -> Meaning(x))\nforall x (Wham(x, josiah) and Rupture(x, quinton) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Undetected(x) and Wham(x, selia) -> Wrest(x, darrin))\nforall x (Wham(x, darrin) -> Wrest(x, selia))\nWham(quinton, darrin) -> Tatty(quinton)\nWrest(quinton, darrin) -> Meaning(quinton)\nforall x (Meaning(x) -> Wrest(x, darrin))\n\nWrest(selia, darrin)\n\nforall x (Meaning(x) -> Wrest(x, darrin)) <- forall x (Rupture(x, selia) -> Meaning(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The gilburt honor the glennis. The gilburt honor the anjela. The gilburt pall the becka. The glennis is overaged. The glennis is eighth. The glennis is lxxi. The becka woolgather the anjela. The becka honor the glennis. The becka pall the gilburt. The anjela is overaged. The anjela woolgather the glennis. The anjela woolgather the becka. If something pall the becka and the becka woolgather the glennis then it is overaged. If something pall the gilburt then it is eighth. If something honor the anjela and it pall the becka then it is aegean. If something is lxxi and it honor the gilburt then it woolgather the glennis. If something honor the glennis then it woolgather the gilburt. If the becka honor the glennis then the becka is aegean. If the becka woolgather the glennis then the becka is eighth. If something is eighth then it woolgather the glennis. The glennis does not visit the anjela.", "logic": "\nHonor(gilburt, glennis)\nHonor(gilburt, anjela)\nPall(gilburt, becka)\nOveraged(glennis)\nEighth(glennis)\nLxxi(glennis)\nWoolgather(becka, anjela)\nHonor(becka, glennis)\nPall(becka, gilburt)\nOveraged(anjela)\nWoolgather(anjela, glennis)\nWoolgather(anjela, becka)\nforall x (Pall(x, becka) and Woolgather(becka, glennis) -> Overaged(x))\nforall x (Pall(x, gilburt) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Honor(x, anjela) and Pall(x, becka) -> Aegean(x))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) and Honor(x, gilburt) -> Woolgather(x, glennis))\nforall x (Honor(x, glennis) -> Woolgather(x, gilburt))\nHonor(becka, glennis) -> Aegean(becka)\nWoolgather(becka, glennis) -> Eighth(becka)\nforall x (Eighth(x) -> Woolgather(x, glennis))\n\nnot Pall(glennis, anjela)\n\nnot Pall(glennis, anjela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The kelcy capsule the adore. The kelcy capsule the ines. The kelcy telescope the gretta. The adore is epochal. The adore is squamulose. The adore is unthawed. The gretta transduce the ines. The gretta capsule the adore. The gretta telescope the kelcy. The ines is epochal. The ines transduce the adore. The ines transduce the gretta. If something telescope the gretta and the gretta transduce the adore then it is epochal. If something telescope the kelcy then it is squamulose. If something capsule the ines and it telescope the gretta then it is inviolate. If something is unthawed and it capsule the kelcy then it transduce the adore. If something capsule the adore then it transduce the kelcy. If the gretta capsule the adore then the gretta is inviolate. If the gretta transduce the adore then the gretta is squamulose. If something is squamulose then it transduce the adore. The adore telescope the adore.", "logic": "\nCapsule(kelcy, adore)\nCapsule(kelcy, ines)\nTelescope(kelcy, gretta)\nEpochal(adore)\nSquamulose(adore)\nUnthawed(adore)\nTransduce(gretta, ines)\nCapsule(gretta, adore)\nTelescope(gretta, kelcy)\nEpochal(ines)\nTransduce(ines, adore)\nTransduce(ines, gretta)\nforall x (Telescope(x, gretta) and Transduce(gretta, adore) -> Epochal(x))\nforall x (Telescope(x, kelcy) -> Squamulose(x))\nforall x (Capsule(x, ines) and Telescope(x, gretta) -> Inviolate(x))\nforall x (Unthawed(x) and Capsule(x, kelcy) -> Transduce(x, adore))\nforall x (Capsule(x, adore) -> Transduce(x, kelcy))\nCapsule(gretta, adore) -> Inviolate(gretta)\nTransduce(gretta, adore) -> Squamulose(gretta)\nforall x (Squamulose(x) -> Transduce(x, adore))\n\nTelescope(adore, adore)\n\nTelescope(adore, adore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The orren parent the mattie. The orren parent the dasya. The orren stupefy the erminie. The mattie is gnarled. The mattie is virginal. The mattie is unrifled. The erminie whimper the dasya. The erminie parent the mattie. The erminie stupefy the orren. The dasya is gnarled. The dasya whimper the mattie. The dasya whimper the erminie. If something stupefy the erminie and the erminie whimper the mattie then it is gnarled. If something stupefy the orren then it is virginal. If something parent the dasya and it stupefy the erminie then it is unmoved. If something is unrifled and it parent the orren then it whimper the mattie. If something parent the mattie then it whimper the orren. If the erminie parent the mattie then the erminie is unmoved. If the erminie whimper the mattie then the erminie is virginal. If something is virginal then it whimper the mattie. The orren is not unrifled.", "logic": "\nParent(orren, mattie)\nParent(orren, dasya)\nStupefy(orren, erminie)\nGnarled(mattie)\nVirginal(mattie)\nUnrifled(mattie)\nWhimper(erminie, dasya)\nParent(erminie, mattie)\nStupefy(erminie, orren)\nGnarled(dasya)\nWhimper(dasya, mattie)\nWhimper(dasya, erminie)\nforall x (Stupefy(x, erminie) and Whimper(erminie, mattie) -> Gnarled(x))\nforall x (Stupefy(x, orren) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Parent(x, dasya) and Stupefy(x, erminie) -> Unmoved(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) and Parent(x, orren) -> Whimper(x, mattie))\nforall x (Parent(x, mattie) -> Whimper(x, orren))\nParent(erminie, mattie) -> Unmoved(erminie)\nWhimper(erminie, mattie) -> Virginal(erminie)\nforall x (Virginal(x) -> Whimper(x, mattie))\n\nnot Unrifled(orren)\n\nnot Unrifled(orren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "The ilana depend the bishop. The ilana depend the filide. The ilana decimalize the janenna. The bishop is lacking. The bishop is studded. The bishop is orienting. The janenna cashier the filide. The janenna depend the bishop. The janenna decimalize the ilana. The filide is lacking. The filide cashier the bishop. The filide cashier the janenna. If something decimalize the janenna and the janenna cashier the bishop then it is lacking. If something decimalize the ilana then it is studded. If something depend the filide and it decimalize the janenna then it is gluey. If something is orienting and it depend the ilana then it cashier the bishop. If something depend the bishop then it cashier the ilana. If the janenna depend the bishop then the janenna is gluey. If the janenna cashier the bishop then the janenna is studded. If something is studded then it cashier the bishop. The filide depend the filide.", "logic": "\nDepend(ilana, bishop)\nDepend(ilana, filide)\nDecimalize(ilana, janenna)\nLacking(bishop)\nStudded(bishop)\nOrienting(bishop)\nCashier(janenna, filide)\nDepend(janenna, bishop)\nDecimalize(janenna, ilana)\nLacking(filide)\nCashier(filide, bishop)\nCashier(filide, janenna)\nforall x (Decimalize(x, janenna) and Cashier(janenna, bishop) -> Lacking(x))\nforall x (Decimalize(x, ilana) -> Studded(x))\nforall x (Depend(x, filide) and Decimalize(x, janenna) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Orienting(x) and Depend(x, ilana) -> Cashier(x, bishop))\nforall x (Depend(x, bishop) -> Cashier(x, ilana))\nDepend(janenna, bishop) -> Gluey(janenna)\nCashier(janenna, bishop) -> Studded(janenna)\nforall x (Studded(x) -> Cashier(x, bishop))\n\nDepend(filide, filide)\n\nDepend(filide, filide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-82"} {"premises": "Elisha is aquiferous. Elisha is rolled. Elisha is harmonical. Horatius is schismatic. Horatius is rolled. Horatius is ascosporic. Horatius is harmonical. All yellowish, aquiferous things are schismatic. If something is schismatic then it is hyoid. If Horatius is aquiferous then Horatius is hyoid. If Elisha is aquiferous then Elisha is yellowish. If something is ascosporic then it is hyoid. If Elisha is aquiferous then Elisha is yellowish. Horatius is harmonical.", "logic": "\nAquiferous(elisha)\nRolled(elisha)\nHarmonical(elisha)\nSchismatic(horatius)\nRolled(horatius)\nAscosporic(horatius)\nHarmonical(horatius)\nforall x (Yellowish(x) and Aquiferous(x) -> Schismatic(x))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) -> Hyoid(x))\nAquiferous(horatius) -> Hyoid(horatius)\nAquiferous(elisha) -> Yellowish(elisha)\nforall x (Ascosporic(x) -> Hyoid(x))\nAquiferous(elisha) -> Yellowish(elisha)\n\nHarmonical(horatius)\n\ntherefore Harmonical(horatius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Malorie is postural. Malorie is anchoritic. Malorie is cambodian. Eloise is neurogenic. Eloise is anchoritic. Eloise is diffuse. Eloise is cambodian. All dendroidal, postural things are neurogenic. If something is neurogenic then it is rakish. If Eloise is postural then Eloise is rakish. If Malorie is postural then Malorie is dendroidal. If something is diffuse then it is rakish. If Malorie is postural then Malorie is dendroidal. Eloise is not anchoritic.", "logic": "\nPostural(malorie)\nAnchoritic(malorie)\nCambodian(malorie)\nNeurogenic(eloise)\nAnchoritic(eloise)\nDiffuse(eloise)\nCambodian(eloise)\nforall x (Dendroidal(x) and Postural(x) -> Neurogenic(x))\nforall x (Neurogenic(x) -> Rakish(x))\nPostural(eloise) -> Rakish(eloise)\nPostural(malorie) -> Dendroidal(malorie)\nforall x (Diffuse(x) -> Rakish(x))\nPostural(malorie) -> Dendroidal(malorie)\n\nnot Anchoritic(eloise)\n\ntherefore Anchoritic(eloise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Gerti is drear. Gerti is mini. Gerti is seated. Tedrick is bicorned. Tedrick is mini. Tedrick is manic. Tedrick is seated. All cognizable, drear things are bicorned. If something is bicorned then it is affordable. If Tedrick is drear then Tedrick is affordable. If Gerti is drear then Gerti is cognizable. If something is manic then it is affordable. If Gerti is drear then Gerti is cognizable. Tedrick is affordable.", "logic": "\nDrear(gerti)\nMini(gerti)\nSeated(gerti)\nBicorned(tedrick)\nMini(tedrick)\nManic(tedrick)\nSeated(tedrick)\nforall x (Cognizable(x) and Drear(x) -> Bicorned(x))\nforall x (Bicorned(x) -> Affordable(x))\nDrear(tedrick) -> Affordable(tedrick)\nDrear(gerti) -> Cognizable(gerti)\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Affordable(x))\nDrear(gerti) -> Cognizable(gerti)\n\nAffordable(tedrick)\n\nBicorned(tedrick) and forall x (Bicorned(x) -> Affordable(x)) -> therefore Affordable(tedrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Linnell is fated. Linnell is changeable. Linnell is colossal. Andi is realizable. Andi is changeable. Andi is magnetized. Andi is colossal. All unmeasured, fated things are realizable. If something is realizable then it is deepening. If Andi is fated then Andi is deepening. If Linnell is fated then Linnell is unmeasured. If something is magnetized then it is deepening. If Linnell is fated then Linnell is unmeasured. Andi is not deepening.", "logic": "\nFated(linnell)\nChangeable(linnell)\nColossal(linnell)\nRealizable(andi)\nChangeable(andi)\nMagnetized(andi)\nColossal(andi)\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) and Fated(x) -> Realizable(x))\nforall x (Realizable(x) -> Deepening(x))\nFated(andi) -> Deepening(andi)\nFated(linnell) -> Unmeasured(linnell)\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Deepening(x))\nFated(linnell) -> Unmeasured(linnell)\n\nnot Deepening(andi)\n\nRealizable(andi) and forall x (Realizable(x) -> Deepening(x)) -> therefore Deepening(andi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Terrill is trilled. Terrill is conelike. Terrill is portentous. Sansone is shavian. Sansone is conelike. Sansone is protozoan. Sansone is portentous. All opposable, trilled things are shavian. If something is shavian then it is threaded. If Sansone is trilled then Sansone is threaded. If Terrill is trilled then Terrill is opposable. If something is protozoan then it is threaded. If Terrill is trilled then Terrill is opposable. Terrill is shavian.", "logic": "\nTrilled(terrill)\nConelike(terrill)\nPortentous(terrill)\nShavian(sansone)\nConelike(sansone)\nProtozoan(sansone)\nPortentous(sansone)\nforall x (Opposable(x) and Trilled(x) -> Shavian(x))\nforall x (Shavian(x) -> Threaded(x))\nTrilled(sansone) -> Threaded(sansone)\nTrilled(terrill) -> Opposable(terrill)\nforall x (Protozoan(x) -> Threaded(x))\nTrilled(terrill) -> Opposable(terrill)\n\nShavian(terrill)\n\nTrilled(terrill) and Trilled(terrill) -> Opposable(terrill) -> therefore Opposable(terrill) Opposable(terrill) and Trilled(terrill) and forall x (Opposable(x) and Trilled(x) -> Shavian(x)) -> therefore Shavian(terrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Wylma is canted. Wylma is muted. Wylma is polyploid. Irene is sterling. Irene is muted. Irene is imported. Irene is polyploid. All unbanded, canted things are sterling. If something is sterling then it is voluted. If Irene is canted then Irene is voluted. If Wylma is canted then Wylma is unbanded. If something is imported then it is voluted. If Wylma is canted then Wylma is unbanded. Wylma is not sterling.", "logic": "\nCanted(wylma)\nMuted(wylma)\nPolyploid(wylma)\nSterling(irene)\nMuted(irene)\nImported(irene)\nPolyploid(irene)\nforall x (Unbanded(x) and Canted(x) -> Sterling(x))\nforall x (Sterling(x) -> Voluted(x))\nCanted(irene) -> Voluted(irene)\nCanted(wylma) -> Unbanded(wylma)\nforall x (Imported(x) -> Voluted(x))\nCanted(wylma) -> Unbanded(wylma)\n\nnot Sterling(wylma)\n\nCanted(wylma) and Canted(wylma) -> Unbanded(wylma) -> therefore Unbanded(wylma) Unbanded(wylma) and Canted(wylma) and forall x (Unbanded(x) and Canted(x) -> Sterling(x)) -> therefore Sterling(wylma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Swen is addictive. Swen is velvety. Swen is guided. Wynne is ethereal. Wynne is velvety. Wynne is disrupted. Wynne is guided. All vulpecular, addictive things are ethereal. If something is ethereal then it is scalic. If Wynne is addictive then Wynne is scalic. If Swen is addictive then Swen is vulpecular. If something is disrupted then it is scalic. If Swen is addictive then Swen is vulpecular. Swen is scalic.", "logic": "\nAddictive(swen)\nVelvety(swen)\nGuided(swen)\nEthereal(wynne)\nVelvety(wynne)\nDisrupted(wynne)\nGuided(wynne)\nforall x (Vulpecular(x) and Addictive(x) -> Ethereal(x))\nforall x (Ethereal(x) -> Scalic(x))\nAddictive(wynne) -> Scalic(wynne)\nAddictive(swen) -> Vulpecular(swen)\nforall x (Disrupted(x) -> Scalic(x))\nAddictive(swen) -> Vulpecular(swen)\n\nScalic(swen)\n\nAddictive(swen) and Addictive(swen) -> Vulpecular(swen) -> therefore Vulpecular(swen) Vulpecular(swen) and Addictive(swen) and forall x (Vulpecular(x) and Addictive(x) -> Ethereal(x)) -> therefore Ethereal(swen) Ethereal(swen) and forall x (Ethereal(x) -> Scalic(x)) -> therefore Scalic(swen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Bethanne is rotatory. Bethanne is ductless. Bethanne is adulterous. Anais is bicoloured. Anais is ductless. Anais is leavened. Anais is adulterous. All confining, rotatory things are bicoloured. If something is bicoloured then it is ingrained. If Anais is rotatory then Anais is ingrained. If Bethanne is rotatory then Bethanne is confining. If something is leavened then it is ingrained. If Bethanne is rotatory then Bethanne is confining. Bethanne is not ingrained.", "logic": "\nRotatory(bethanne)\nDuctless(bethanne)\nAdulterous(bethanne)\nBicoloured(anais)\nDuctless(anais)\nLeavened(anais)\nAdulterous(anais)\nforall x (Confining(x) and Rotatory(x) -> Bicoloured(x))\nforall x (Bicoloured(x) -> Ingrained(x))\nRotatory(anais) -> Ingrained(anais)\nRotatory(bethanne) -> Confining(bethanne)\nforall x (Leavened(x) -> Ingrained(x))\nRotatory(bethanne) -> Confining(bethanne)\n\nnot Ingrained(bethanne)\n\nRotatory(bethanne) and Rotatory(bethanne) -> Confining(bethanne) -> therefore Confining(bethanne) Confining(bethanne) and Rotatory(bethanne) and forall x (Confining(x) and Rotatory(x) -> Bicoloured(x)) -> therefore Bicoloured(bethanne) Bicoloured(bethanne) and forall x (Bicoloured(x) -> Ingrained(x)) -> therefore Ingrained(bethanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Maridel is steadied. Maridel is thankful. Maridel is pleased. Kristine is silenced. Kristine is thankful. Kristine is modish. Kristine is pleased. All interlaced, steadied things are silenced. If something is silenced then it is barky. If Kristine is steadied then Kristine is barky. If Maridel is steadied then Maridel is interlaced. If something is modish then it is barky. If Maridel is steadied then Maridel is interlaced. Kristine is not interlaced.", "logic": "\nSteadied(maridel)\nThankful(maridel)\nPleased(maridel)\nSilenced(kristine)\nThankful(kristine)\nModish(kristine)\nPleased(kristine)\nforall x (Interlaced(x) and Steadied(x) -> Silenced(x))\nforall x (Silenced(x) -> Barky(x))\nSteadied(kristine) -> Barky(kristine)\nSteadied(maridel) -> Interlaced(maridel)\nforall x (Modish(x) -> Barky(x))\nSteadied(maridel) -> Interlaced(maridel)\n\nnot Interlaced(kristine)\n\nnot Interlaced(kristine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Sholom is agrestic. Sholom is leathery. Sholom is ungrudging. Corliss is feigned. Corliss is leathery. Corliss is readable. Corliss is ungrudging. All fibrillose, agrestic things are feigned. If something is feigned then it is drumhead. If Corliss is agrestic then Corliss is drumhead. If Sholom is agrestic then Sholom is fibrillose. If something is readable then it is drumhead. If Sholom is agrestic then Sholom is fibrillose. Sholom is readable.", "logic": "\nAgrestic(sholom)\nLeathery(sholom)\nUngrudging(sholom)\nFeigned(corliss)\nLeathery(corliss)\nReadable(corliss)\nUngrudging(corliss)\nforall x (Fibrillose(x) and Agrestic(x) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Feigned(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nAgrestic(corliss) -> Drumhead(corliss)\nAgrestic(sholom) -> Fibrillose(sholom)\nforall x (Readable(x) -> Drumhead(x))\nAgrestic(sholom) -> Fibrillose(sholom)\n\nReadable(sholom)\n\nReadable(sholom) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-46"} {"premises": "Latrina is cataphatic. Latrina is endoscopic. Latrina is cognisable. Latrina is factorial. Latrina is southward. Mallory is cataphatic. Mallory is tearing. Mallory is southward. Klara is cataphatic. Klara is endoscopic. Klara is cognisable. Klara is tearing. Klara is factorial. Klara is southward. Holli is factorial. Holli is southward. If someone is southward then they are cognisable. Green, factorial people are ladened. Red people are factorial. All factorial, ladened people are cognisable. All factorial people are southward. If someone is cognisable then they are ladened. Klara is cataphatic.", "logic": "\nCataphatic(latrina)\nEndoscopic(latrina)\nCognisable(latrina)\nFactorial(latrina)\nSouthward(latrina)\nCataphatic(mallory)\nTearing(mallory)\nSouthward(mallory)\nCataphatic(klara)\nEndoscopic(klara)\nCognisable(klara)\nTearing(klara)\nFactorial(klara)\nSouthward(klara)\nFactorial(holli)\nSouthward(holli)\nforall x (Southward(x) -> Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) and Factorial(x) -> Ladened(x))\nforall x (Ladened(x) -> Factorial(x))\nforall x (Factorial(x) and Ladened(x) -> Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> Southward(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) -> Ladened(x))\n\nCataphatic(klara)\n\ntherefore Cataphatic(klara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Fania is defoliated. Fania is female. Fania is fractional. Fania is persian. Fania is geodesic. Ahmet is defoliated. Ahmet is subjective. Ahmet is geodesic. Samaria is defoliated. Samaria is female. Samaria is fractional. Samaria is subjective. Samaria is persian. Samaria is geodesic. Sandra is persian. Sandra is geodesic. If someone is geodesic then they are fractional. Green, persian people are sectional. Red people are persian. All persian, sectional people are fractional. All persian people are geodesic. If someone is fractional then they are sectional. Samaria is not persian.", "logic": "\nDefoliated(fania)\nFemale(fania)\nFractional(fania)\nPersian(fania)\nGeodesic(fania)\nDefoliated(ahmet)\nSubjective(ahmet)\nGeodesic(ahmet)\nDefoliated(samaria)\nFemale(samaria)\nFractional(samaria)\nSubjective(samaria)\nPersian(samaria)\nGeodesic(samaria)\nPersian(sandra)\nGeodesic(sandra)\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Fractional(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) and Persian(x) -> Sectional(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Persian(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) and Sectional(x) -> Fractional(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) -> Sectional(x))\n\nnot Persian(samaria)\n\ntherefore Persian(samaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Pooh is neutral. Pooh is impersonal. Pooh is weaponed. Pooh is vexatious. Pooh is perineal. Timmi is neutral. Timmi is dozen. Timmi is perineal. Suzie is neutral. Suzie is impersonal. Suzie is weaponed. Suzie is dozen. Suzie is vexatious. Suzie is perineal. Reeba is vexatious. Reeba is perineal. If someone is perineal then they are weaponed. Green, vexatious people are rugose. Red people are vexatious. All vexatious, rugose people are weaponed. All vexatious people are perineal. If someone is weaponed then they are rugose. Reeba is weaponed.", "logic": "\nNeutral(pooh)\nImpersonal(pooh)\nWeaponed(pooh)\nVexatious(pooh)\nPerineal(pooh)\nNeutral(timmi)\nDozen(timmi)\nPerineal(timmi)\nNeutral(suzie)\nImpersonal(suzie)\nWeaponed(suzie)\nDozen(suzie)\nVexatious(suzie)\nPerineal(suzie)\nVexatious(reeba)\nPerineal(reeba)\nforall x (Perineal(x) -> Weaponed(x))\nforall x (Weaponed(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Rugose(x))\nforall x (Rugose(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Vexatious(x) and Rugose(x) -> Weaponed(x))\nforall x (Vexatious(x) -> Perineal(x))\nforall x (Weaponed(x) -> Rugose(x))\n\nWeaponed(reeba)\n\nPerineal(reeba) and forall x (Perineal(x) -> Weaponed(x)) -> therefore Weaponed(reeba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Renado is jubilant. Renado is convinced. Renado is shouldered. Renado is signal. Renado is snazzy. Red is jubilant. Red is polyatomic. Red is snazzy. Ina is jubilant. Ina is convinced. Ina is shouldered. Ina is polyatomic. Ina is signal. Ina is snazzy. Blinni is signal. Blinni is snazzy. If someone is snazzy then they are shouldered. Green, signal people are unthematic. Red people are signal. All signal, unthematic people are shouldered. All signal people are snazzy. If someone is shouldered then they are unthematic. Renado is not unthematic.", "logic": "\nJubilant(renado)\nConvinced(renado)\nShouldered(renado)\nSignal(renado)\nSnazzy(renado)\nJubilant(red)\nPolyatomic(red)\nSnazzy(red)\nJubilant(ina)\nConvinced(ina)\nShouldered(ina)\nPolyatomic(ina)\nSignal(ina)\nSnazzy(ina)\nSignal(blinni)\nSnazzy(blinni)\nforall x (Snazzy(x) -> Shouldered(x))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Signal(x) -> Unthematic(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Signal(x))\nforall x (Signal(x) and Unthematic(x) -> Shouldered(x))\nforall x (Signal(x) -> Snazzy(x))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) -> Unthematic(x))\n\nnot Unthematic(renado)\n\nShouldered(renado) and forall x (Shouldered(x) -> Unthematic(x)) -> therefore Unthematic(renado)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Holley is optional. Holley is injectable. Holley is haywire. Holley is geological. Holley is sulphurous. Bria is optional. Bria is barefooted. Bria is sulphurous. Cindi is optional. Cindi is injectable. Cindi is haywire. Cindi is barefooted. Cindi is geological. Cindi is sulphurous. Susanna is geological. Susanna is sulphurous. If someone is sulphurous then they are haywire. Green, geological people are bearing. Red people are geological. All geological, bearing people are haywire. All geological people are sulphurous. If someone is haywire then they are bearing. Susanna is bearing.", "logic": "\nOptional(holley)\nInjectable(holley)\nHaywire(holley)\nGeological(holley)\nSulphurous(holley)\nOptional(bria)\nBarefooted(bria)\nSulphurous(bria)\nOptional(cindi)\nInjectable(cindi)\nHaywire(cindi)\nBarefooted(cindi)\nGeological(cindi)\nSulphurous(cindi)\nGeological(susanna)\nSulphurous(susanna)\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) and Geological(x) -> Bearing(x))\nforall x (Bearing(x) -> Geological(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) and Bearing(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) -> Sulphurous(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Bearing(x))\n\nBearing(susanna)\n\nSulphurous(susanna) and forall x (Sulphurous(x) -> Haywire(x)) -> therefore Haywire(susanna) Haywire(susanna) and forall x (Haywire(x) -> Bearing(x)) -> therefore Bearing(susanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Paten is privileged. Paten is unbeknown. Paten is doped. Paten is grotty. Paten is campanular. Cornellis is privileged. Cornellis is bolshy. Cornellis is campanular. Eliot is privileged. Eliot is unbeknown. Eliot is doped. Eliot is bolshy. Eliot is grotty. Eliot is campanular. Locke is grotty. Locke is campanular. If someone is campanular then they are doped. Green, grotty people are shuttered. Red people are grotty. All grotty, shuttered people are doped. All grotty people are campanular. If someone is doped then they are shuttered. Locke is not shuttered.", "logic": "\nPrivileged(paten)\nUnbeknown(paten)\nDoped(paten)\nGrotty(paten)\nCampanular(paten)\nPrivileged(cornellis)\nBolshy(cornellis)\nCampanular(cornellis)\nPrivileged(eliot)\nUnbeknown(eliot)\nDoped(eliot)\nBolshy(eliot)\nGrotty(eliot)\nCampanular(eliot)\nGrotty(locke)\nCampanular(locke)\nforall x (Campanular(x) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) and Grotty(x) -> Shuttered(x))\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Grotty(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) and Shuttered(x) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Campanular(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Shuttered(x))\n\nnot Shuttered(locke)\n\nCampanular(locke) and forall x (Campanular(x) -> Doped(x)) -> therefore Doped(locke) Doped(locke) and forall x (Doped(x) -> Shuttered(x)) -> therefore Shuttered(locke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Tyne is dandy. Tyne is raptorial. Tyne is derived. Tyne is azido. Tyne is bistred. Dani is dandy. Dani is changeable. Dani is bistred. Lainey is dandy. Lainey is raptorial. Lainey is derived. Lainey is changeable. Lainey is azido. Lainey is bistred. Chiarra is azido. Chiarra is bistred. If someone is bistred then they are derived. Green, azido people are flavorless. Red people are azido. All azido, flavorless people are derived. All azido people are bistred. If someone is derived then they are flavorless. Dani is azido.", "logic": "\nDandy(tyne)\nRaptorial(tyne)\nDerived(tyne)\nAzido(tyne)\nBistred(tyne)\nDandy(dani)\nChangeable(dani)\nBistred(dani)\nDandy(lainey)\nRaptorial(lainey)\nDerived(lainey)\nChangeable(lainey)\nAzido(lainey)\nBistred(lainey)\nAzido(chiarra)\nBistred(chiarra)\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> Derived(x))\nforall x (Derived(x) and Azido(x) -> Flavorless(x))\nforall x (Flavorless(x) -> Azido(x))\nforall x (Azido(x) and Flavorless(x) -> Derived(x))\nforall x (Azido(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Derived(x) -> Flavorless(x))\n\nAzido(dani)\n\nBistred(dani) and forall x (Bistred(x) -> Derived(x)) -> therefore Derived(dani) Derived(dani) and forall x (Derived(x) -> Flavorless(x)) -> therefore Flavorless(dani) Flavorless(dani) and forall x (Flavorless(x) -> Azido(x)) -> therefore Azido(dani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Rowe is rustic. Rowe is loverly. Rowe is betting. Rowe is applicable. Rowe is lineal. Sammie is rustic. Sammie is unfinished. Sammie is lineal. Yard is rustic. Yard is loverly. Yard is betting. Yard is unfinished. Yard is applicable. Yard is lineal. Valaree is applicable. Valaree is lineal. If someone is lineal then they are betting. Green, applicable people are epilithic. Red people are applicable. All applicable, epilithic people are betting. All applicable people are lineal. If someone is betting then they are epilithic. Sammie is not applicable.", "logic": "\nRustic(rowe)\nLoverly(rowe)\nBetting(rowe)\nApplicable(rowe)\nLineal(rowe)\nRustic(sammie)\nUnfinished(sammie)\nLineal(sammie)\nRustic(yard)\nLoverly(yard)\nBetting(yard)\nUnfinished(yard)\nApplicable(yard)\nLineal(yard)\nApplicable(valaree)\nLineal(valaree)\nforall x (Lineal(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) and Applicable(x) -> Epilithic(x))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) -> Applicable(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) and Epilithic(x) -> Betting(x))\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Lineal(x))\nforall x (Betting(x) -> Epilithic(x))\n\nnot Applicable(sammie)\n\nLineal(sammie) and forall x (Lineal(x) -> Betting(x)) -> therefore Betting(sammie) Betting(sammie) and forall x (Betting(x) -> Epilithic(x)) -> therefore Epilithic(sammie) Epilithic(sammie) and forall x (Epilithic(x) -> Applicable(x)) -> therefore Applicable(sammie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Liuka is errorless. Liuka is cxxv. Liuka is tartaric. Liuka is darkling. Liuka is express. Jefferey is errorless. Jefferey is exorbitant. Jefferey is express. Madison is errorless. Madison is cxxv. Madison is tartaric. Madison is exorbitant. Madison is darkling. Madison is express. Meggi is darkling. Meggi is express. If someone is express then they are tartaric. Green, darkling people are antiblack. Red people are darkling. All darkling, antiblack people are tartaric. All darkling people are express. If someone is tartaric then they are antiblack. Jefferey is not cxxv.", "logic": "\nErrorless(liuka)\nCxxv(liuka)\nTartaric(liuka)\nDarkling(liuka)\nExpress(liuka)\nErrorless(jefferey)\nExorbitant(jefferey)\nExpress(jefferey)\nErrorless(madison)\nCxxv(madison)\nTartaric(madison)\nExorbitant(madison)\nDarkling(madison)\nExpress(madison)\nDarkling(meggi)\nExpress(meggi)\nforall x (Express(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nforall x (Tartaric(x) and Darkling(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Darkling(x))\nforall x (Darkling(x) and Antiblack(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nforall x (Darkling(x) -> Express(x))\nforall x (Tartaric(x) -> Antiblack(x))\n\nnot Cxxv(jefferey)\n\nnot Cxxv(jefferey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Felicia is factual. Felicia is auriferous. Felicia is auditory. Felicia is amiss. Felicia is cavitied. Dov is factual. Dov is populous. Dov is cavitied. Milissent is factual. Milissent is auriferous. Milissent is auditory. Milissent is populous. Milissent is amiss. Milissent is cavitied. Salomon is amiss. Salomon is cavitied. If someone is cavitied then they are auditory. Green, amiss people are subjacent. Red people are amiss. All amiss, subjacent people are auditory. All amiss people are cavitied. If someone is auditory then they are subjacent. Salomon is auriferous.", "logic": "\nFactual(felicia)\nAuriferous(felicia)\nAuditory(felicia)\nAmiss(felicia)\nCavitied(felicia)\nFactual(dov)\nPopulous(dov)\nCavitied(dov)\nFactual(milissent)\nAuriferous(milissent)\nAuditory(milissent)\nPopulous(milissent)\nAmiss(milissent)\nCavitied(milissent)\nAmiss(salomon)\nCavitied(salomon)\nforall x (Cavitied(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Auditory(x) and Amiss(x) -> Subjacent(x))\nforall x (Subjacent(x) -> Amiss(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) and Subjacent(x) -> Auditory(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> Cavitied(x))\nforall x (Auditory(x) -> Subjacent(x))\n\nAuriferous(salomon)\n\nAuriferous(salomon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Mickie is fattish. Mickie is quenchless. Mickie is genoese. Mickie is formless. Mickie is unnoted. Derrek is fattish. Derrek is epiphyseal. Derrek is unnoted. Mick is fattish. Mick is quenchless. Mick is genoese. Mick is epiphyseal. Mick is formless. Mick is unnoted. Sal is formless. Sal is unnoted. If someone is unnoted then they are genoese. Green, formless people are striking. Red people are formless. All formless, striking people are genoese. All formless people are unnoted. If someone is genoese then they are striking. Mickie is not epiphyseal.", "logic": "\nFattish(mickie)\nQuenchless(mickie)\nGenoese(mickie)\nFormless(mickie)\nUnnoted(mickie)\nFattish(derrek)\nEpiphyseal(derrek)\nUnnoted(derrek)\nFattish(mick)\nQuenchless(mick)\nGenoese(mick)\nEpiphyseal(mick)\nFormless(mick)\nUnnoted(mick)\nFormless(sal)\nUnnoted(sal)\nforall x (Unnoted(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Genoese(x) and Formless(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Striking(x) -> Formless(x))\nforall x (Formless(x) and Striking(x) -> Genoese(x))\nforall x (Formless(x) -> Unnoted(x))\nforall x (Genoese(x) -> Striking(x))\n\nnot Epiphyseal(mickie)\n\nnot Epiphyseal(mickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Hephzibah is cloze. Hephzibah is rosy. Hephzibah is coplanar. Hephzibah is parvenu. Hephzibah is resiny. Floyd is cloze. Floyd is compound. Floyd is resiny. Vinod is cloze. Vinod is rosy. Vinod is coplanar. Vinod is compound. Vinod is parvenu. Vinod is resiny. Lenny is parvenu. Lenny is resiny. If someone is resiny then they are coplanar. Green, parvenu people are dizygous. Red people are parvenu. All parvenu, dizygous people are coplanar. All parvenu people are resiny. If someone is coplanar then they are dizygous. Lenny is cloze.", "logic": "\nCloze(hephzibah)\nRosy(hephzibah)\nCoplanar(hephzibah)\nParvenu(hephzibah)\nResiny(hephzibah)\nCloze(floyd)\nCompound(floyd)\nResiny(floyd)\nCloze(vinod)\nRosy(vinod)\nCoplanar(vinod)\nCompound(vinod)\nParvenu(vinod)\nResiny(vinod)\nParvenu(lenny)\nResiny(lenny)\nforall x (Resiny(x) -> Coplanar(x))\nforall x (Coplanar(x) and Parvenu(x) -> Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and Dizygous(x) -> Coplanar(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Resiny(x))\nforall x (Coplanar(x) -> Dizygous(x))\n\nCloze(lenny)\n\nCloze(lenny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1051"} {"premises": "Bary is armenian. Bary is not metatarsal. Bary is umbrella. Bary is actual. Bary is labouring. Bary is severed. Sargent is not umteen. Sargent is metatarsal. Sargent is umbrella. Sargent is not actual. Sargent is labouring. Sargent is severed. Angeline is armenian. Angeline is metatarsal. Angeline is umbrella. Angeline is not severed. If someone is metatarsal and labouring then they are not umteen. Bary is armenian.", "logic": "\nArmenian(bary)\nnot Metatarsal(bary)\nUmbrella(bary)\nActual(bary)\nLabouring(bary)\nSevered(bary)\nnot Umteen(sargent)\nMetatarsal(sargent)\nUmbrella(sargent)\nnot Actual(sargent)\nLabouring(sargent)\nSevered(sargent)\nArmenian(angeline)\nMetatarsal(angeline)\nUmbrella(angeline)\nnot Severed(angeline)\nforall x (Metatarsal(x) and Labouring(x) -> not Umteen(x))\n\nArmenian(bary)\n\ntherefore Armenian(bary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6060"} {"premises": "Orbadiah is ravishing. Orbadiah is not flaring. Orbadiah is unbent. Orbadiah is columbian. Orbadiah is sensual. Orbadiah is fingerlike. Bettina is not phyletic. Bettina is flaring. Bettina is unbent. Bettina is not columbian. Bettina is sensual. Bettina is fingerlike. Shanon is ravishing. Shanon is flaring. Shanon is unbent. Shanon is not fingerlike. If someone is flaring and sensual then they are not phyletic. Bettina is phyletic.", "logic": "\nRavishing(orbadiah)\nnot Flaring(orbadiah)\nUnbent(orbadiah)\nColumbian(orbadiah)\nSensual(orbadiah)\nFingerlike(orbadiah)\nnot Phyletic(bettina)\nFlaring(bettina)\nUnbent(bettina)\nnot Columbian(bettina)\nSensual(bettina)\nFingerlike(bettina)\nRavishing(shanon)\nFlaring(shanon)\nUnbent(shanon)\nnot Fingerlike(shanon)\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Sensual(x) -> not Phyletic(x))\n\nPhyletic(bettina)\n\ntherefore not Phyletic(bettina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6060"} {"premises": "Latia is canadian. Latia is not supportive. Latia is acceptable. Latia is distrait. Latia is painterly. Latia is mendacious. Sile is not methylated. Sile is supportive. Sile is acceptable. Sile is not distrait. Sile is painterly. Sile is mendacious. Ximenez is canadian. Ximenez is supportive. Ximenez is acceptable. Ximenez is not mendacious. If someone is supportive and painterly then they are not methylated. Ximenez is not distrait.", "logic": "\nCanadian(latia)\nnot Supportive(latia)\nAcceptable(latia)\nDistrait(latia)\nPainterly(latia)\nMendacious(latia)\nnot Methylated(sile)\nSupportive(sile)\nAcceptable(sile)\nnot Distrait(sile)\nPainterly(sile)\nMendacious(sile)\nCanadian(ximenez)\nSupportive(ximenez)\nAcceptable(ximenez)\nnot Mendacious(ximenez)\nforall x (Supportive(x) and Painterly(x) -> not Methylated(x))\n\nnot Distrait(ximenez)\n\nnot Distrait(ximenez) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6060"} {"premises": "Larisa is diminished. Larisa is not baric. Larisa is hollow. Larisa is desirable. Larisa is trilled. Larisa is fusty. Maudie is not burnable. Maudie is baric. Maudie is hollow. Maudie is not desirable. Maudie is trilled. Maudie is fusty. Clarette is diminished. Clarette is baric. Clarette is hollow. Clarette is not fusty. If someone is baric and trilled then they are not burnable. Clarette is burnable.", "logic": "\nDiminished(larisa)\nnot Baric(larisa)\nHollow(larisa)\nDesirable(larisa)\nTrilled(larisa)\nFusty(larisa)\nnot Burnable(maudie)\nBaric(maudie)\nHollow(maudie)\nnot Desirable(maudie)\nTrilled(maudie)\nFusty(maudie)\nDiminished(clarette)\nBaric(clarette)\nHollow(clarette)\nnot Fusty(clarette)\nforall x (Baric(x) and Trilled(x) -> not Burnable(x))\n\nBurnable(clarette)\n\nBurnable(clarette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6060"} {"premises": "The silvano degrade the kelli. The silvano abreact the kelli. The silvano bare the carol. The silvano bare the kelli. The carol degrade the silvano. The carol degrade the kelli. The carol is melancholy. The carol is tapered. The carol abreact the silvano. The carol bare the silvano. The kelli degrade the silvano. The kelli abreact the carol. If the silvano bare the carol then the carol degrade the silvano. If someone bare the kelli and the kelli abreact the carol then they are detailed. If someone is melancholy then they are tapered. If someone abreact the kelli then they are melancholy. If someone abreact the carol then they need the kelli. If someone degrade the carol and they are assuring then the carol is assuring. If someone is assuring and they need the silvano then the silvano degrade the kelli. If someone is melancholy then they need the carol. The carol is tapered.", "logic": "\nDegrade(silvano, kelli)\nAbreact(silvano, kelli)\nBare(silvano, carol)\nBare(silvano, kelli)\nDegrade(carol, silvano)\nDegrade(carol, kelli)\nMelancholy(carol)\nTapered(carol)\nAbreact(carol, silvano)\nBare(carol, silvano)\nDegrade(kelli, silvano)\nAbreact(kelli, carol)\nBare(silvano, carol) -> Degrade(carol, silvano)\nforall x (Bare(x, kelli) and Abreact(kelli, carol) -> Detailed(x))\nforall x (Melancholy(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Abreact(x, kelli) -> Melancholy(x))\nforall x (Abreact(x, carol) -> Abreact(x, kelli))\nforall x (Degrade(x, carol) and Assuring(x) -> Assuring(carol))\nforall x (Assuring(x) and Abreact(x, silvano) -> Degrade(silvano, kelli))\nforall x (Melancholy(x) -> Abreact(x, carol))\n\nTapered(carol)\n\ntherefore Tapered(carol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The aggie traffic the jolie. The aggie grit the jolie. The aggie filigree the luna. The aggie filigree the jolie. The luna traffic the aggie. The luna traffic the jolie. The luna is topologic. The luna is moving. The luna grit the aggie. The luna filigree the aggie. The jolie traffic the aggie. The jolie grit the luna. If the aggie filigree the luna then the luna traffic the aggie. If someone filigree the jolie and the jolie grit the luna then they are austrian. If someone is topologic then they are moving. If someone grit the jolie then they are topologic. If someone grit the luna then they need the jolie. If someone traffic the luna and they are uniovular then the luna is uniovular. If someone is uniovular and they need the aggie then the aggie traffic the jolie. If someone is topologic then they need the luna. The aggie does not visit the jolie.", "logic": "\nTraffic(aggie, jolie)\nGrit(aggie, jolie)\nFiligree(aggie, luna)\nFiligree(aggie, jolie)\nTraffic(luna, aggie)\nTraffic(luna, jolie)\nTopologic(luna)\nMoving(luna)\nGrit(luna, aggie)\nFiligree(luna, aggie)\nTraffic(jolie, aggie)\nGrit(jolie, luna)\nFiligree(aggie, luna) -> Traffic(luna, aggie)\nforall x (Filigree(x, jolie) and Grit(jolie, luna) -> Austrian(x))\nforall x (Topologic(x) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Grit(x, jolie) -> Topologic(x))\nforall x (Grit(x, luna) -> Grit(x, jolie))\nforall x (Traffic(x, luna) and Uniovular(x) -> Uniovular(luna))\nforall x (Uniovular(x) and Grit(x, aggie) -> Traffic(aggie, jolie))\nforall x (Topologic(x) -> Grit(x, luna))\n\nnot Filigree(aggie, jolie)\n\ntherefore Filigree(aggie, jolie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The rachelle outgrow the dimitrou. The rachelle furbish the dimitrou. The rachelle pack the chiquita. The rachelle pack the dimitrou. The chiquita outgrow the rachelle. The chiquita outgrow the dimitrou. The chiquita is modernized. The chiquita is retrousse. The chiquita furbish the rachelle. The chiquita pack the rachelle. The dimitrou outgrow the rachelle. The dimitrou furbish the chiquita. If the rachelle pack the chiquita then the chiquita outgrow the rachelle. If someone pack the dimitrou and the dimitrou furbish the chiquita then they are cherry. If someone is modernized then they are retrousse. If someone furbish the dimitrou then they are modernized. If someone furbish the chiquita then they need the dimitrou. If someone outgrow the chiquita and they are seismic then the chiquita is seismic. If someone is seismic and they need the rachelle then the rachelle outgrow the dimitrou. If someone is modernized then they need the chiquita. The rachelle is cherry.", "logic": "\nOutgrow(rachelle, dimitrou)\nFurbish(rachelle, dimitrou)\nPack(rachelle, chiquita)\nPack(rachelle, dimitrou)\nOutgrow(chiquita, rachelle)\nOutgrow(chiquita, dimitrou)\nModernized(chiquita)\nRetrousse(chiquita)\nFurbish(chiquita, rachelle)\nPack(chiquita, rachelle)\nOutgrow(dimitrou, rachelle)\nFurbish(dimitrou, chiquita)\nPack(rachelle, chiquita) -> Outgrow(chiquita, rachelle)\nforall x (Pack(x, dimitrou) and Furbish(dimitrou, chiquita) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Retrousse(x))\nforall x (Furbish(x, dimitrou) -> Modernized(x))\nforall x (Furbish(x, chiquita) -> Furbish(x, dimitrou))\nforall x (Outgrow(x, chiquita) and Seismic(x) -> Seismic(chiquita))\nforall x (Seismic(x) and Furbish(x, rachelle) -> Outgrow(rachelle, dimitrou))\nforall x (Modernized(x) -> Furbish(x, chiquita))\n\nCherry(rachelle)\n\nPack(rachelle, dimitrou) and Furbish(dimitrou, chiquita) and forall x (Pack(x, dimitrou) and Furbish(dimitrou, chiquita) -> Cherry(x)) -> therefore Cherry(rachelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The sharron devaluate the hamid. The sharron bath the hamid. The sharron dissever the renaldo. The sharron dissever the hamid. The renaldo devaluate the sharron. The renaldo devaluate the hamid. The renaldo is stodgy. The renaldo is hysterical. The renaldo bath the sharron. The renaldo dissever the sharron. The hamid devaluate the sharron. The hamid bath the renaldo. If the sharron dissever the renaldo then the renaldo devaluate the sharron. If someone dissever the hamid and the hamid bath the renaldo then they are peptic. If someone is stodgy then they are hysterical. If someone bath the hamid then they are stodgy. If someone bath the renaldo then they need the hamid. If someone devaluate the renaldo and they are reformist then the renaldo is reformist. If someone is reformist and they need the sharron then the sharron devaluate the hamid. If someone is stodgy then they need the renaldo. The hamid does not need the hamid.", "logic": "\nDevaluate(sharron, hamid)\nBath(sharron, hamid)\nDissever(sharron, renaldo)\nDissever(sharron, hamid)\nDevaluate(renaldo, sharron)\nDevaluate(renaldo, hamid)\nStodgy(renaldo)\nHysterical(renaldo)\nBath(renaldo, sharron)\nDissever(renaldo, sharron)\nDevaluate(hamid, sharron)\nBath(hamid, renaldo)\nDissever(sharron, renaldo) -> Devaluate(renaldo, sharron)\nforall x (Dissever(x, hamid) and Bath(hamid, renaldo) -> Peptic(x))\nforall x (Stodgy(x) -> Hysterical(x))\nforall x (Bath(x, hamid) -> Stodgy(x))\nforall x (Bath(x, renaldo) -> Bath(x, hamid))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, renaldo) and Reformist(x) -> Reformist(renaldo))\nforall x (Reformist(x) and Bath(x, sharron) -> Devaluate(sharron, hamid))\nforall x (Stodgy(x) -> Bath(x, renaldo))\n\nnot Bath(hamid, hamid)\n\nBath(hamid, renaldo) and forall x (Bath(x, renaldo) -> Bath(x, hamid)) -> therefore Bath(hamid, hamid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The pincus mislead the richardo. The pincus augment the richardo. The pincus haul the fabio. The pincus haul the richardo. The fabio mislead the pincus. The fabio mislead the richardo. The fabio is scrambled. The fabio is brushlike. The fabio augment the pincus. The fabio haul the pincus. The richardo mislead the pincus. The richardo augment the fabio. If the pincus haul the fabio then the fabio mislead the pincus. If someone haul the richardo and the richardo augment the fabio then they are airtight. If someone is scrambled then they are brushlike. If someone augment the richardo then they are scrambled. If someone augment the fabio then they need the richardo. If someone mislead the fabio and they are intriguing then the fabio is intriguing. If someone is intriguing and they need the pincus then the pincus mislead the richardo. If someone is scrambled then they need the fabio. The fabio augment the richardo.", "logic": "\nMislead(pincus, richardo)\nAugment(pincus, richardo)\nHaul(pincus, fabio)\nHaul(pincus, richardo)\nMislead(fabio, pincus)\nMislead(fabio, richardo)\nScrambled(fabio)\nBrushlike(fabio)\nAugment(fabio, pincus)\nHaul(fabio, pincus)\nMislead(richardo, pincus)\nAugment(richardo, fabio)\nHaul(pincus, fabio) -> Mislead(fabio, pincus)\nforall x (Haul(x, richardo) and Augment(richardo, fabio) -> Airtight(x))\nforall x (Scrambled(x) -> Brushlike(x))\nforall x (Augment(x, richardo) -> Scrambled(x))\nforall x (Augment(x, fabio) -> Augment(x, richardo))\nforall x (Mislead(x, fabio) and Intriguing(x) -> Intriguing(fabio))\nforall x (Intriguing(x) and Augment(x, pincus) -> Mislead(pincus, richardo))\nforall x (Scrambled(x) -> Augment(x, fabio))\n\nAugment(fabio, richardo)\n\nScrambled(fabio) and forall x (Scrambled(x) -> Augment(x, fabio)) -> therefore Augment(fabio, fabio) Augment(fabio, fabio) and forall x (Augment(x, fabio) -> Augment(x, richardo)) -> therefore Augment(fabio, richardo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The rodrigo relay the cherilyn. The rodrigo deaden the cherilyn. The rodrigo chirrup the theda. The rodrigo chirrup the cherilyn. The theda relay the rodrigo. The theda relay the cherilyn. The theda is menopausal. The theda is dutiable. The theda deaden the rodrigo. The theda chirrup the rodrigo. The cherilyn relay the rodrigo. The cherilyn deaden the theda. If the rodrigo chirrup the theda then the theda relay the rodrigo. If someone chirrup the cherilyn and the cherilyn deaden the theda then they are deathlike. If someone is menopausal then they are dutiable. If someone deaden the cherilyn then they are menopausal. If someone deaden the theda then they need the cherilyn. If someone relay the theda and they are miotic then the theda is miotic. If someone is miotic and they need the rodrigo then the rodrigo relay the cherilyn. If someone is menopausal then they need the theda. The rodrigo is not dutiable.", "logic": "\nRelay(rodrigo, cherilyn)\nDeaden(rodrigo, cherilyn)\nChirrup(rodrigo, theda)\nChirrup(rodrigo, cherilyn)\nRelay(theda, rodrigo)\nRelay(theda, cherilyn)\nMenopausal(theda)\nDutiable(theda)\nDeaden(theda, rodrigo)\nChirrup(theda, rodrigo)\nRelay(cherilyn, rodrigo)\nDeaden(cherilyn, theda)\nChirrup(rodrigo, theda) -> Relay(theda, rodrigo)\nforall x (Chirrup(x, cherilyn) and Deaden(cherilyn, theda) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Menopausal(x) -> Dutiable(x))\nforall x (Deaden(x, cherilyn) -> Menopausal(x))\nforall x (Deaden(x, theda) -> Deaden(x, cherilyn))\nforall x (Relay(x, theda) and Miotic(x) -> Miotic(theda))\nforall x (Miotic(x) and Deaden(x, rodrigo) -> Relay(rodrigo, cherilyn))\nforall x (Menopausal(x) -> Deaden(x, theda))\n\nnot Dutiable(rodrigo)\n\nDeaden(rodrigo, cherilyn) and forall x (Deaden(x, cherilyn) -> Menopausal(x)) -> therefore Menopausal(rodrigo) Menopausal(rodrigo) and forall x (Menopausal(x) -> Dutiable(x)) -> therefore Dutiable(rodrigo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The bharat mind the flinn. The bharat pause the flinn. The bharat fasten the ibrahim. The bharat fasten the flinn. The ibrahim mind the bharat. The ibrahim mind the flinn. The ibrahim is vivid. The ibrahim is decimal. The ibrahim pause the bharat. The ibrahim fasten the bharat. The flinn mind the bharat. The flinn pause the ibrahim. If the bharat fasten the ibrahim then the ibrahim mind the bharat. If someone fasten the flinn and the flinn pause the ibrahim then they are encircling. If someone is vivid then they are decimal. If someone pause the flinn then they are vivid. If someone pause the ibrahim then they need the flinn. If someone mind the ibrahim and they are irruptive then the ibrahim is irruptive. If someone is irruptive and they need the bharat then the bharat mind the flinn. If someone is vivid then they need the ibrahim. The flinn is decimal.", "logic": "\nMind(bharat, flinn)\nPause(bharat, flinn)\nFasten(bharat, ibrahim)\nFasten(bharat, flinn)\nMind(ibrahim, bharat)\nMind(ibrahim, flinn)\nVivid(ibrahim)\nDecimal(ibrahim)\nPause(ibrahim, bharat)\nFasten(ibrahim, bharat)\nMind(flinn, bharat)\nPause(flinn, ibrahim)\nFasten(bharat, ibrahim) -> Mind(ibrahim, bharat)\nforall x (Fasten(x, flinn) and Pause(flinn, ibrahim) -> Encircling(x))\nforall x (Vivid(x) -> Decimal(x))\nforall x (Pause(x, flinn) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Pause(x, ibrahim) -> Pause(x, flinn))\nforall x (Mind(x, ibrahim) and Irruptive(x) -> Irruptive(ibrahim))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) and Pause(x, bharat) -> Mind(bharat, flinn))\nforall x (Vivid(x) -> Pause(x, ibrahim))\n\nDecimal(flinn)\n\nPause(flinn, ibrahim) and forall x (Pause(x, ibrahim) -> Pause(x, flinn)) -> therefore Pause(flinn, flinn) Pause(flinn, flinn) and forall x (Pause(x, flinn) -> Vivid(x)) -> therefore Vivid(flinn) Vivid(flinn) and forall x (Vivid(x) -> Decimal(x)) -> therefore Decimal(flinn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The janel fall the camellia. The janel await the camellia. The janel excuse the ximenes. The janel excuse the camellia. The ximenes fall the janel. The ximenes fall the camellia. The ximenes is upcoming. The ximenes is uncarved. The ximenes await the janel. The ximenes excuse the janel. The camellia fall the janel. The camellia await the ximenes. If the janel excuse the ximenes then the ximenes fall the janel. If someone excuse the camellia and the camellia await the ximenes then they are fitted. If someone is upcoming then they are uncarved. If someone await the camellia then they are upcoming. If someone await the ximenes then they need the camellia. If someone fall the ximenes and they are cowardly then the ximenes is cowardly. If someone is cowardly and they need the janel then the janel fall the camellia. If someone is upcoming then they need the ximenes. The camellia is not uncarved.", "logic": "\nFall(janel, camellia)\nAwait(janel, camellia)\nExcuse(janel, ximenes)\nExcuse(janel, camellia)\nFall(ximenes, janel)\nFall(ximenes, camellia)\nUpcoming(ximenes)\nUncarved(ximenes)\nAwait(ximenes, janel)\nExcuse(ximenes, janel)\nFall(camellia, janel)\nAwait(camellia, ximenes)\nExcuse(janel, ximenes) -> Fall(ximenes, janel)\nforall x (Excuse(x, camellia) and Await(camellia, ximenes) -> Fitted(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) -> Uncarved(x))\nforall x (Await(x, camellia) -> Upcoming(x))\nforall x (Await(x, ximenes) -> Await(x, camellia))\nforall x (Fall(x, ximenes) and Cowardly(x) -> Cowardly(ximenes))\nforall x (Cowardly(x) and Await(x, janel) -> Fall(janel, camellia))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) -> Await(x, ximenes))\n\nnot Uncarved(camellia)\n\nAwait(camellia, ximenes) and forall x (Await(x, ximenes) -> Await(x, camellia)) -> therefore Await(camellia, camellia) Await(camellia, camellia) and forall x (Await(x, camellia) -> Upcoming(x)) -> therefore Upcoming(camellia) Upcoming(camellia) and forall x (Upcoming(x) -> Uncarved(x)) -> therefore Uncarved(camellia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The carmen squinch the alf. The carmen subpoena the alf. The carmen liquidize the karoly. The carmen liquidize the alf. The karoly squinch the carmen. The karoly squinch the alf. The karoly is edgy. The karoly is grassless. The karoly subpoena the carmen. The karoly liquidize the carmen. The alf squinch the carmen. The alf subpoena the karoly. If the carmen liquidize the karoly then the karoly squinch the carmen. If someone liquidize the alf and the alf subpoena the karoly then they are saxicolous. If someone is edgy then they are grassless. If someone subpoena the alf then they are edgy. If someone subpoena the karoly then they need the alf. If someone squinch the karoly and they are trilingual then the karoly is trilingual. If someone is trilingual and they need the carmen then the carmen squinch the alf. If someone is edgy then they need the karoly. The karoly is not saxicolous.", "logic": "\nSquinch(carmen, alf)\nSubpoena(carmen, alf)\nLiquidize(carmen, karoly)\nLiquidize(carmen, alf)\nSquinch(karoly, carmen)\nSquinch(karoly, alf)\nEdgy(karoly)\nGrassless(karoly)\nSubpoena(karoly, carmen)\nLiquidize(karoly, carmen)\nSquinch(alf, carmen)\nSubpoena(alf, karoly)\nLiquidize(carmen, karoly) -> Squinch(karoly, carmen)\nforall x (Liquidize(x, alf) and Subpoena(alf, karoly) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Edgy(x) -> Grassless(x))\nforall x (Subpoena(x, alf) -> Edgy(x))\nforall x (Subpoena(x, karoly) -> Subpoena(x, alf))\nforall x (Squinch(x, karoly) and Trilingual(x) -> Trilingual(karoly))\nforall x (Trilingual(x) and Subpoena(x, carmen) -> Squinch(carmen, alf))\nforall x (Edgy(x) -> Subpoena(x, karoly))\n\nnot Saxicolous(karoly)\n\nforall x (Liquidize(x, alf) and Subpoena(alf, karoly) -> Saxicolous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The charlotte bury the sergent. The charlotte calk the sergent. The charlotte foreordain the lita. The charlotte foreordain the sergent. The lita bury the charlotte. The lita bury the sergent. The lita is humbled. The lita is priceless. The lita calk the charlotte. The lita foreordain the charlotte. The sergent bury the charlotte. The sergent calk the lita. If the charlotte foreordain the lita then the lita bury the charlotte. If someone foreordain the sergent and the sergent calk the lita then they are annelidan. If someone is humbled then they are priceless. If someone calk the sergent then they are humbled. If someone calk the lita then they need the sergent. If someone bury the lita and they are depictive then the lita is depictive. If someone is depictive and they need the charlotte then the charlotte bury the sergent. If someone is humbled then they need the lita. The lita is depictive.", "logic": "\nBury(charlotte, sergent)\nCalk(charlotte, sergent)\nForeordain(charlotte, lita)\nForeordain(charlotte, sergent)\nBury(lita, charlotte)\nBury(lita, sergent)\nHumbled(lita)\nPriceless(lita)\nCalk(lita, charlotte)\nForeordain(lita, charlotte)\nBury(sergent, charlotte)\nCalk(sergent, lita)\nForeordain(charlotte, lita) -> Bury(lita, charlotte)\nforall x (Foreordain(x, sergent) and Calk(sergent, lita) -> Annelidan(x))\nforall x (Humbled(x) -> Priceless(x))\nforall x (Calk(x, sergent) -> Humbled(x))\nforall x (Calk(x, lita) -> Calk(x, sergent))\nforall x (Bury(x, lita) and Depictive(x) -> Depictive(lita))\nforall x (Depictive(x) and Calk(x, charlotte) -> Bury(charlotte, sergent))\nforall x (Humbled(x) -> Calk(x, lita))\n\nDepictive(lita)\n\nforall x (Bury(x, lita) and Depictive(x) -> Depictive(lita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The henrietta mortise the brena. The henrietta abide the brena. The henrietta actualise the raf. The henrietta actualise the brena. The raf mortise the henrietta. The raf mortise the brena. The raf is louvered. The raf is beaming. The raf abide the henrietta. The raf actualise the henrietta. The brena mortise the henrietta. The brena abide the raf. If the henrietta actualise the raf then the raf mortise the henrietta. If someone actualise the brena and the brena abide the raf then they are javanese. If someone is louvered then they are beaming. If someone abide the brena then they are louvered. If someone abide the raf then they need the brena. If someone mortise the raf and they are standpat then the raf is standpat. If someone is standpat and they need the henrietta then the henrietta mortise the brena. If someone is louvered then they need the raf. The brena is not javanese.", "logic": "\nMortise(henrietta, brena)\nAbide(henrietta, brena)\nActualise(henrietta, raf)\nActualise(henrietta, brena)\nMortise(raf, henrietta)\nMortise(raf, brena)\nLouvered(raf)\nBeaming(raf)\nAbide(raf, henrietta)\nActualise(raf, henrietta)\nMortise(brena, henrietta)\nAbide(brena, raf)\nActualise(henrietta, raf) -> Mortise(raf, henrietta)\nforall x (Actualise(x, brena) and Abide(brena, raf) -> Javanese(x))\nforall x (Louvered(x) -> Beaming(x))\nforall x (Abide(x, brena) -> Louvered(x))\nforall x (Abide(x, raf) -> Abide(x, brena))\nforall x (Mortise(x, raf) and Standpat(x) -> Standpat(raf))\nforall x (Standpat(x) and Abide(x, henrietta) -> Mortise(henrietta, brena))\nforall x (Louvered(x) -> Abide(x, raf))\n\nnot Javanese(brena)\n\nforall x (Actualise(x, brena) and Abide(brena, raf) -> Javanese(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The prisca miter the winna. The prisca stomach the winna. The prisca caress the clarissa. The prisca caress the winna. The clarissa miter the prisca. The clarissa miter the winna. The clarissa is laced. The clarissa is wobbling. The clarissa stomach the prisca. The clarissa caress the prisca. The winna miter the prisca. The winna stomach the clarissa. If the prisca caress the clarissa then the clarissa miter the prisca. If someone caress the winna and the winna stomach the clarissa then they are thai. If someone is laced then they are wobbling. If someone stomach the winna then they are laced. If someone stomach the clarissa then they need the winna. If someone miter the clarissa and they are loopy then the clarissa is loopy. If someone is loopy and they need the prisca then the prisca miter the winna. If someone is laced then they need the clarissa. The clarissa miter the clarissa.", "logic": "\nMiter(prisca, winna)\nStomach(prisca, winna)\nCaress(prisca, clarissa)\nCaress(prisca, winna)\nMiter(clarissa, prisca)\nMiter(clarissa, winna)\nLaced(clarissa)\nWobbling(clarissa)\nStomach(clarissa, prisca)\nCaress(clarissa, prisca)\nMiter(winna, prisca)\nStomach(winna, clarissa)\nCaress(prisca, clarissa) -> Miter(clarissa, prisca)\nforall x (Caress(x, winna) and Stomach(winna, clarissa) -> Thai(x))\nforall x (Laced(x) -> Wobbling(x))\nforall x (Stomach(x, winna) -> Laced(x))\nforall x (Stomach(x, clarissa) -> Stomach(x, winna))\nforall x (Miter(x, clarissa) and Loopy(x) -> Loopy(clarissa))\nforall x (Loopy(x) and Stomach(x, prisca) -> Miter(prisca, winna))\nforall x (Laced(x) -> Stomach(x, clarissa))\n\nMiter(clarissa, clarissa)\n\nMiter(clarissa, clarissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The alden appose the kristyn. The alden lustrate the kristyn. The alden outgo the wes. The alden outgo the kristyn. The wes appose the alden. The wes appose the kristyn. The wes is foldaway. The wes is stomatal. The wes lustrate the alden. The wes outgo the alden. The kristyn appose the alden. The kristyn lustrate the wes. If the alden outgo the wes then the wes appose the alden. If someone outgo the kristyn and the kristyn lustrate the wes then they are southbound. If someone is foldaway then they are stomatal. If someone lustrate the kristyn then they are foldaway. If someone lustrate the wes then they need the kristyn. If someone appose the wes and they are travelled then the wes is travelled. If someone is travelled and they need the alden then the alden appose the kristyn. If someone is foldaway then they need the wes. The kristyn does not eat the kristyn.", "logic": "\nAppose(alden, kristyn)\nLustrate(alden, kristyn)\nOutgo(alden, wes)\nOutgo(alden, kristyn)\nAppose(wes, alden)\nAppose(wes, kristyn)\nFoldaway(wes)\nStomatal(wes)\nLustrate(wes, alden)\nOutgo(wes, alden)\nAppose(kristyn, alden)\nLustrate(kristyn, wes)\nOutgo(alden, wes) -> Appose(wes, alden)\nforall x (Outgo(x, kristyn) and Lustrate(kristyn, wes) -> Southbound(x))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Stomatal(x))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, kristyn) -> Foldaway(x))\nforall x (Lustrate(x, wes) -> Lustrate(x, kristyn))\nforall x (Appose(x, wes) and Travelled(x) -> Travelled(wes))\nforall x (Travelled(x) and Lustrate(x, alden) -> Appose(alden, kristyn))\nforall x (Foldaway(x) -> Lustrate(x, wes))\n\nnot Appose(kristyn, kristyn)\n\nnot Appose(kristyn, kristyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The ursula anglicise the veronique. The ursula besot the veronique. The ursula loft the josephina. The ursula loft the veronique. The josephina anglicise the ursula. The josephina anglicise the veronique. The josephina is iatrogenic. The josephina is lamplit. The josephina besot the ursula. The josephina loft the ursula. The veronique anglicise the ursula. The veronique besot the josephina. If the ursula loft the josephina then the josephina anglicise the ursula. If someone loft the veronique and the veronique besot the josephina then they are lowbrow. If someone is iatrogenic then they are lamplit. If someone besot the veronique then they are iatrogenic. If someone besot the josephina then they need the veronique. If someone anglicise the josephina and they are fitted then the josephina is fitted. If someone is fitted and they need the ursula then the ursula anglicise the veronique. If someone is iatrogenic then they need the josephina. The josephina loft the josephina.", "logic": "\nAnglicise(ursula, veronique)\nBesot(ursula, veronique)\nLoft(ursula, josephina)\nLoft(ursula, veronique)\nAnglicise(josephina, ursula)\nAnglicise(josephina, veronique)\nIatrogenic(josephina)\nLamplit(josephina)\nBesot(josephina, ursula)\nLoft(josephina, ursula)\nAnglicise(veronique, ursula)\nBesot(veronique, josephina)\nLoft(ursula, josephina) -> Anglicise(josephina, ursula)\nforall x (Loft(x, veronique) and Besot(veronique, josephina) -> Lowbrow(x))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Lamplit(x))\nforall x (Besot(x, veronique) -> Iatrogenic(x))\nforall x (Besot(x, josephina) -> Besot(x, veronique))\nforall x (Anglicise(x, josephina) and Fitted(x) -> Fitted(josephina))\nforall x (Fitted(x) and Besot(x, ursula) -> Anglicise(ursula, veronique))\nforall x (Iatrogenic(x) -> Besot(x, josephina))\n\nLoft(josephina, josephina)\n\nLoft(josephina, josephina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The sharline favor the nissa. The sharline enclothe the nissa. The sharline consist the jaine. The sharline consist the nissa. The jaine favor the sharline. The jaine favor the nissa. The jaine is geodesic. The jaine is marmorean. The jaine enclothe the sharline. The jaine consist the sharline. The nissa favor the sharline. The nissa enclothe the jaine. If the sharline consist the jaine then the jaine favor the sharline. If someone consist the nissa and the nissa enclothe the jaine then they are jamaican. If someone is geodesic then they are marmorean. If someone enclothe the nissa then they are geodesic. If someone enclothe the jaine then they need the nissa. If someone favor the jaine and they are ubiquitous then the jaine is ubiquitous. If someone is ubiquitous and they need the sharline then the sharline favor the nissa. If someone is geodesic then they need the jaine. The jaine does not visit the nissa.", "logic": "\nFavor(sharline, nissa)\nEnclothe(sharline, nissa)\nConsist(sharline, jaine)\nConsist(sharline, nissa)\nFavor(jaine, sharline)\nFavor(jaine, nissa)\nGeodesic(jaine)\nMarmorean(jaine)\nEnclothe(jaine, sharline)\nConsist(jaine, sharline)\nFavor(nissa, sharline)\nEnclothe(nissa, jaine)\nConsist(sharline, jaine) -> Favor(jaine, sharline)\nforall x (Consist(x, nissa) and Enclothe(nissa, jaine) -> Jamaican(x))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Marmorean(x))\nforall x (Enclothe(x, nissa) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Enclothe(x, jaine) -> Enclothe(x, nissa))\nforall x (Favor(x, jaine) and Ubiquitous(x) -> Ubiquitous(jaine))\nforall x (Ubiquitous(x) and Enclothe(x, sharline) -> Favor(sharline, nissa))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Enclothe(x, jaine))\n\nnot Consist(jaine, nissa)\n\nnot Consist(jaine, nissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The shaina stalk the valencia. The shaina tousle the valencia. The shaina accession the lilyan. The shaina accession the valencia. The lilyan stalk the shaina. The lilyan stalk the valencia. The lilyan is mammary. The lilyan is rending. The lilyan tousle the shaina. The lilyan accession the shaina. The valencia stalk the shaina. The valencia tousle the lilyan. If the shaina accession the lilyan then the lilyan stalk the shaina. If someone accession the valencia and the valencia tousle the lilyan then they are boxy. If someone is mammary then they are rending. If someone tousle the valencia then they are mammary. If someone tousle the lilyan then they need the valencia. If someone stalk the lilyan and they are lxxxvii then the lilyan is lxxxvii. If someone is lxxxvii and they need the shaina then the shaina stalk the valencia. If someone is mammary then they need the lilyan. The shaina stalk the lilyan.", "logic": "\nStalk(shaina, valencia)\nTousle(shaina, valencia)\nAccession(shaina, lilyan)\nAccession(shaina, valencia)\nStalk(lilyan, shaina)\nStalk(lilyan, valencia)\nMammary(lilyan)\nRending(lilyan)\nTousle(lilyan, shaina)\nAccession(lilyan, shaina)\nStalk(valencia, shaina)\nTousle(valencia, lilyan)\nAccession(shaina, lilyan) -> Stalk(lilyan, shaina)\nforall x (Accession(x, valencia) and Tousle(valencia, lilyan) -> Boxy(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) -> Rending(x))\nforall x (Tousle(x, valencia) -> Mammary(x))\nforall x (Tousle(x, lilyan) -> Tousle(x, valencia))\nforall x (Stalk(x, lilyan) and Lxxxvii(x) -> Lxxxvii(lilyan))\nforall x (Lxxxvii(x) and Tousle(x, shaina) -> Stalk(shaina, valencia))\nforall x (Mammary(x) -> Tousle(x, lilyan))\n\nStalk(shaina, lilyan)\n\nStalk(shaina, lilyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1631"} {"premises": "The ruthie bench the laure. The ruthie does not eat the laure. The ruthie corduroy the hogan. The ruthie is desolate. The ruthie is not unsmooth. The ruthie is littler. The ruthie does not see the laure. The laure does not chase the hogan. The laure corduroy the ruthie. The laure is unsmooth. The hogan bench the ruthie. The hogan bench the laure. The hogan corduroy the ruthie. The hogan corduroy the laure. The hogan is desolate. The hogan sheer the laure. If something bench the laure then the laure is desolate. If the ruthie is desolate then the ruthie is palmate. If something bench the laure and the laure corduroy the hogan then it corduroy the hogan. If the hogan does not see the ruthie then the hogan corduroy the ruthie. If something sheer the hogan and the hogan does not see the ruthie then the hogan corduroy the ruthie. If something corduroy the hogan and it is palmate then the hogan is not littler. If something corduroy the ruthie and it is virtuoso then it corduroy the laure. If the laure is not desolate then the laure is littler. The ruthie is desolate.", "logic": "\nBench(ruthie, laure)\nnot Corduroy(ruthie, laure)\nCorduroy(ruthie, hogan)\nDesolate(ruthie)\nnot Unsmooth(ruthie)\nLittler(ruthie)\nnot Sheer(ruthie, laure)\nnot Bench(laure, hogan)\nCorduroy(laure, ruthie)\nUnsmooth(laure)\nBench(hogan, ruthie)\nBench(hogan, laure)\nCorduroy(hogan, ruthie)\nCorduroy(hogan, laure)\nDesolate(hogan)\nSheer(hogan, laure)\nforall x (Bench(x, laure) -> Desolate(laure))\nDesolate(ruthie) -> Palmate(ruthie)\nforall x (Bench(x, laure) and Corduroy(laure, hogan) -> Corduroy(x, hogan))\nnot Sheer(hogan, ruthie) -> Corduroy(hogan, ruthie)\nforall x (Sheer(x, hogan) and not Sheer(hogan, ruthie) -> Corduroy(hogan, ruthie))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, hogan) and Palmate(x) -> not Littler(hogan))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, ruthie) and Virtuoso(x) -> Corduroy(x, laure))\nnot Desolate(laure) -> Littler(laure)\n\nDesolate(ruthie)\n\ntherefore Desolate(ruthie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5611"} {"premises": "The elora acetylize the lisetta. The elora does not eat the lisetta. The elora screw the guendolen. The elora is woody. The elora is not dirigible. The elora is rotational. The elora does not see the lisetta. The lisetta does not chase the guendolen. The lisetta screw the elora. The lisetta is dirigible. The guendolen acetylize the elora. The guendolen acetylize the lisetta. The guendolen screw the elora. The guendolen screw the lisetta. The guendolen is woody. The guendolen corduroy the lisetta. If something acetylize the lisetta then the lisetta is woody. If the elora is woody then the elora is caloric. If something acetylize the lisetta and the lisetta screw the guendolen then it screw the guendolen. If the guendolen does not see the elora then the guendolen screw the elora. If something corduroy the guendolen and the guendolen does not see the elora then the guendolen screw the elora. If something screw the guendolen and it is caloric then the guendolen is not rotational. If something screw the elora and it is flaunty then it screw the lisetta. If the lisetta is not woody then the lisetta is rotational. The lisetta acetylize the guendolen.", "logic": "\nAcetylize(elora, lisetta)\nnot Screw(elora, lisetta)\nScrew(elora, guendolen)\nWoody(elora)\nnot Dirigible(elora)\nRotational(elora)\nnot Corduroy(elora, lisetta)\nnot Acetylize(lisetta, guendolen)\nScrew(lisetta, elora)\nDirigible(lisetta)\nAcetylize(guendolen, elora)\nAcetylize(guendolen, lisetta)\nScrew(guendolen, elora)\nScrew(guendolen, lisetta)\nWoody(guendolen)\nCorduroy(guendolen, lisetta)\nforall x (Acetylize(x, lisetta) -> Woody(lisetta))\nWoody(elora) -> Caloric(elora)\nforall x (Acetylize(x, lisetta) and Screw(lisetta, guendolen) -> Screw(x, guendolen))\nnot Corduroy(guendolen, elora) -> Screw(guendolen, elora)\nforall x (Corduroy(x, guendolen) and not Corduroy(guendolen, elora) -> Screw(guendolen, elora))\nforall x (Screw(x, guendolen) and Caloric(x) -> not Rotational(guendolen))\nforall x (Screw(x, elora) and Flaunty(x) -> Screw(x, lisetta))\nnot Woody(lisetta) -> Rotational(lisetta)\n\nAcetylize(lisetta, guendolen)\n\ntherefore not Acetylize(lisetta, guendolen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5611"} {"premises": "The jacenta literalise the allah. The jacenta does not eat the allah. The jacenta drip the haley. The jacenta is unaffixed. The jacenta is not spent. The jacenta is used. The jacenta does not see the allah. The allah does not chase the haley. The allah drip the jacenta. The allah is spent. The haley literalise the jacenta. The haley literalise the allah. The haley drip the jacenta. The haley drip the allah. The haley is unaffixed. The haley engraft the allah. If something literalise the allah then the allah is unaffixed. If the jacenta is unaffixed then the jacenta is seminal. If something literalise the allah and the allah drip the haley then it drip the haley. If the haley does not see the jacenta then the haley drip the jacenta. If something engraft the haley and the haley does not see the jacenta then the haley drip the jacenta. If something drip the haley and it is seminal then the haley is not used. If something drip the jacenta and it is nucleate then it drip the allah. If the allah is not unaffixed then the allah is used. The haley does not eat the haley.", "logic": "\nLiteralise(jacenta, allah)\nnot Drip(jacenta, allah)\nDrip(jacenta, haley)\nUnaffixed(jacenta)\nnot Spent(jacenta)\nUsed(jacenta)\nnot Engraft(jacenta, allah)\nnot Literalise(allah, haley)\nDrip(allah, jacenta)\nSpent(allah)\nLiteralise(haley, jacenta)\nLiteralise(haley, allah)\nDrip(haley, jacenta)\nDrip(haley, allah)\nUnaffixed(haley)\nEngraft(haley, allah)\nforall x (Literalise(x, allah) -> Unaffixed(allah))\nUnaffixed(jacenta) -> Seminal(jacenta)\nforall x (Literalise(x, allah) and Drip(allah, haley) -> Drip(x, haley))\nnot Engraft(haley, jacenta) -> Drip(haley, jacenta)\nforall x (Engraft(x, haley) and not Engraft(haley, jacenta) -> Drip(haley, jacenta))\nforall x (Drip(x, haley) and Seminal(x) -> not Used(haley))\nforall x (Drip(x, jacenta) and Nucleate(x) -> Drip(x, allah))\nnot Unaffixed(allah) -> Used(allah)\n\nnot Drip(haley, haley)\n\nforall x (Literalise(x, allah) and Drip(allah, haley) -> Drip(x, haley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5611"} {"premises": "The sigfrid plat the madeleine. The sigfrid does not eat the madeleine. The sigfrid endow the joceline. The sigfrid is openhanded. The sigfrid is not bestubbled. The sigfrid is foaming. The sigfrid does not see the madeleine. The madeleine does not chase the joceline. The madeleine endow the sigfrid. The madeleine is bestubbled. The joceline plat the sigfrid. The joceline plat the madeleine. The joceline endow the sigfrid. The joceline endow the madeleine. The joceline is openhanded. The joceline deduct the madeleine. If something plat the madeleine then the madeleine is openhanded. If the sigfrid is openhanded then the sigfrid is stormproof. If something plat the madeleine and the madeleine endow the joceline then it endow the joceline. If the joceline does not see the sigfrid then the joceline endow the sigfrid. If something deduct the joceline and the joceline does not see the sigfrid then the joceline endow the sigfrid. If something endow the joceline and it is stormproof then the joceline is not foaming. If something endow the sigfrid and it is couthy then it endow the madeleine. If the madeleine is not openhanded then the madeleine is foaming. The madeleine plat the sigfrid.", "logic": "\nPlat(sigfrid, madeleine)\nnot Endow(sigfrid, madeleine)\nEndow(sigfrid, joceline)\nOpenhanded(sigfrid)\nnot Bestubbled(sigfrid)\nFoaming(sigfrid)\nnot Deduct(sigfrid, madeleine)\nnot Plat(madeleine, joceline)\nEndow(madeleine, sigfrid)\nBestubbled(madeleine)\nPlat(joceline, sigfrid)\nPlat(joceline, madeleine)\nEndow(joceline, sigfrid)\nEndow(joceline, madeleine)\nOpenhanded(joceline)\nDeduct(joceline, madeleine)\nforall x (Plat(x, madeleine) -> Openhanded(madeleine))\nOpenhanded(sigfrid) -> Stormproof(sigfrid)\nforall x (Plat(x, madeleine) and Endow(madeleine, joceline) -> Endow(x, joceline))\nnot Deduct(joceline, sigfrid) -> Endow(joceline, sigfrid)\nforall x (Deduct(x, joceline) and not Deduct(joceline, sigfrid) -> Endow(joceline, sigfrid))\nforall x (Endow(x, joceline) and Stormproof(x) -> not Foaming(joceline))\nforall x (Endow(x, sigfrid) and Couthy(x) -> Endow(x, madeleine))\nnot Openhanded(madeleine) -> Foaming(madeleine)\n\nPlat(madeleine, sigfrid)\n\nPlat(madeleine, sigfrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5611"} {"premises": "Hastings is cagy. Devi is not trackable. Agatha is shakedown. All trackable things are adductive. All cagy, groveling things are uveal. Agatha is shakedown.", "logic": "\nCagy(hastings)\nnot Trackable(devi)\nShakedown(agatha)\nforall x (Trackable(x) -> Adductive(x))\nforall x (Cagy(x) and Groveling(x) -> Uveal(x))\n\nShakedown(agatha)\n\ntherefore Shakedown(agatha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2340"} {"premises": "Kellia is aramaean. Quintilla is not bumptious. Ambrose is sacred. All bumptious things are igneous. All aramaean, cuban things are anarchic. Kellia is not aramaean.", "logic": "\nAramaean(kellia)\nnot Bumptious(quintilla)\nSacred(ambrose)\nforall x (Bumptious(x) -> Igneous(x))\nforall x (Aramaean(x) and Cuban(x) -> Anarchic(x))\n\nnot Aramaean(kellia)\n\ntherefore Aramaean(kellia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2340"} {"premises": "Joline is woeful. Stinky is not stressed. Kristy is stagey. All stressed things are lonely. All woeful, passerine things are emollient. Joline is not lonely.", "logic": "\nWoeful(joline)\nnot Stressed(stinky)\nStagey(kristy)\nforall x (Stressed(x) -> Lonely(x))\nforall x (Woeful(x) and Passerine(x) -> Emollient(x))\n\nnot Lonely(joline)\n\nforall x (Stressed(x) -> Lonely(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2340"} {"premises": "Stephan is meditative. Carie is not fiery. Gert is sissified. All fiery things are brindle. All meditative, cultured things are luxurious. Gert is cultured.", "logic": "\nMeditative(stephan)\nnot Fiery(carie)\nSissified(gert)\nforall x (Fiery(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Meditative(x) and Cultured(x) -> Luxurious(x))\n\nCultured(gert)\n\nCultured(gert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-2340"} {"premises": "Arly is unparented. Arly is arrogant. Hartley is arrogant. Smart, arrogant things are ottoman. Green, unparented things are duplicate. If something is faithful and not unparented then it is duplicate. Kind things are faithful. If something is ottoman then it is shouted. All duplicate things are shouted. All potent, ottoman things are arrogant. If Arly is unparented then Arly is ottoman. Arly is arrogant.", "logic": "\nUnparented(arly)\nArrogant(arly)\nArrogant(hartley)\nforall x (Unparented(x) and Arrogant(x) -> Ottoman(x))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) and Unparented(x) -> Duplicate(x))\nforall x (Faithful(x) and not Unparented(x) -> Duplicate(x))\nforall x (Shouted(x) -> Faithful(x))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) -> Shouted(x))\nforall x (Duplicate(x) -> Shouted(x))\nforall x (Potent(x) and Ottoman(x) -> Arrogant(x))\nUnparented(arly) -> Ottoman(arly)\n\nArrogant(arly)\n\ntherefore Arrogant(arly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Urbano is sigmoid. Urbano is broody. Kyle is broody. Smart, broody things are slivery. Green, sigmoid things are hunched. If something is judicial and not sigmoid then it is hunched. Kind things are judicial. If something is slivery then it is purgative. All hunched things are purgative. All nettled, slivery things are broody. If Urbano is sigmoid then Urbano is slivery. Kyle is not broody.", "logic": "\nSigmoid(urbano)\nBroody(urbano)\nBroody(kyle)\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) and Broody(x) -> Slivery(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) and Sigmoid(x) -> Hunched(x))\nforall x (Judicial(x) and not Sigmoid(x) -> Hunched(x))\nforall x (Purgative(x) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Slivery(x) -> Purgative(x))\nforall x (Hunched(x) -> Purgative(x))\nforall x (Nettled(x) and Slivery(x) -> Broody(x))\nSigmoid(urbano) -> Slivery(urbano)\n\nnot Broody(kyle)\n\ntherefore Broody(kyle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Cyndi is shattered. Cyndi is cloaked. Job is cloaked. Smart, cloaked things are gentle. Green, shattered things are odorless. If something is appealing and not shattered then it is odorless. Kind things are appealing. If something is gentle then it is unheeding. All odorless things are unheeding. All unvented, gentle things are cloaked. If Cyndi is shattered then Cyndi is gentle. Cyndi is gentle.", "logic": "\nShattered(cyndi)\nCloaked(cyndi)\nCloaked(job)\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Cloaked(x) -> Gentle(x))\nforall x (Gentle(x) and Shattered(x) -> Odorless(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) and not Shattered(x) -> Odorless(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) -> Appealing(x))\nforall x (Gentle(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Odorless(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Unvented(x) and Gentle(x) -> Cloaked(x))\nShattered(cyndi) -> Gentle(cyndi)\n\nGentle(cyndi)\n\nShattered(cyndi) and Shattered(cyndi) -> Gentle(cyndi) -> therefore Gentle(cyndi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Shorty is fugal. Shorty is static. Renae is static. Smart, static things are outgoing. Green, fugal things are shavian. If something is bicoloured and not fugal then it is shavian. Kind things are bicoloured. If something is outgoing then it is atactic. All shavian things are atactic. All arable, outgoing things are static. If Shorty is fugal then Shorty is outgoing. Shorty is not outgoing.", "logic": "\nFugal(shorty)\nStatic(shorty)\nStatic(renae)\nforall x (Fugal(x) and Static(x) -> Outgoing(x))\nforall x (Outgoing(x) and Fugal(x) -> Shavian(x))\nforall x (Bicoloured(x) and not Fugal(x) -> Shavian(x))\nforall x (Atactic(x) -> Bicoloured(x))\nforall x (Outgoing(x) -> Atactic(x))\nforall x (Shavian(x) -> Atactic(x))\nforall x (Arable(x) and Outgoing(x) -> Static(x))\nFugal(shorty) -> Outgoing(shorty)\n\nnot Outgoing(shorty)\n\nFugal(shorty) and Fugal(shorty) -> Outgoing(shorty) -> therefore Outgoing(shorty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Oren is agonized. Oren is unremedied. Felipa is unremedied. Smart, unremedied things are lawless. Green, agonized things are sinkable. If something is gumptious and not agonized then it is sinkable. Kind things are gumptious. If something is lawless then it is epitheliod. All sinkable things are epitheliod. All cautionary, lawless things are unremedied. If Oren is agonized then Oren is lawless. Oren is epitheliod.", "logic": "\nAgonized(oren)\nUnremedied(oren)\nUnremedied(felipa)\nforall x (Agonized(x) and Unremedied(x) -> Lawless(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) and Agonized(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Gumptious(x) and not Agonized(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Gumptious(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) -> Epitheliod(x))\nforall x (Sinkable(x) -> Epitheliod(x))\nforall x (Cautionary(x) and Lawless(x) -> Unremedied(x))\nAgonized(oren) -> Lawless(oren)\n\nEpitheliod(oren)\n\nAgonized(oren) and Agonized(oren) -> Lawless(oren) -> therefore Lawless(oren) Lawless(oren) and forall x (Lawless(x) -> Epitheliod(x)) -> therefore Epitheliod(oren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Farley is insolvable. Farley is unkeyed. Rajeev is unkeyed. Smart, unkeyed things are catapultic. Green, insolvable things are planless. If something is sprigged and not insolvable then it is planless. Kind things are sprigged. If something is catapultic then it is languorous. All planless things are languorous. All worthless, catapultic things are unkeyed. If Farley is insolvable then Farley is catapultic. Farley is not languorous.", "logic": "\nInsolvable(farley)\nUnkeyed(farley)\nUnkeyed(rajeev)\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Unkeyed(x) -> Catapultic(x))\nforall x (Catapultic(x) and Insolvable(x) -> Planless(x))\nforall x (Sprigged(x) and not Insolvable(x) -> Planless(x))\nforall x (Languorous(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Catapultic(x) -> Languorous(x))\nforall x (Planless(x) -> Languorous(x))\nforall x (Worthless(x) and Catapultic(x) -> Unkeyed(x))\nInsolvable(farley) -> Catapultic(farley)\n\nnot Languorous(farley)\n\nInsolvable(farley) and Insolvable(farley) -> Catapultic(farley) -> therefore Catapultic(farley) Catapultic(farley) and forall x (Catapultic(x) -> Languorous(x)) -> therefore Languorous(farley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Letta is purposeful. Letta is fallow. Isabeau is fallow. Smart, fallow things are piddling. Green, purposeful things are seasoned. If something is aortic and not purposeful then it is seasoned. Kind things are aortic. If something is piddling then it is light. All seasoned things are light. All mortal, piddling things are fallow. If Letta is purposeful then Letta is piddling. Letta is aortic.", "logic": "\nPurposeful(letta)\nFallow(letta)\nFallow(isabeau)\nforall x (Purposeful(x) and Fallow(x) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) and Purposeful(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Aortic(x) and not Purposeful(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Light(x) -> Aortic(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) -> Light(x))\nforall x (Mortal(x) and Piddling(x) -> Fallow(x))\nPurposeful(letta) -> Piddling(letta)\n\nAortic(letta)\n\nPurposeful(letta) and Purposeful(letta) -> Piddling(letta) -> therefore Piddling(letta) Piddling(letta) and forall x (Piddling(x) -> Light(x)) -> therefore Light(letta) Light(letta) and forall x (Light(x) -> Aortic(x)) -> therefore Aortic(letta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Tracey is syrupy. Tracey is congealed. Salli is congealed. Smart, congealed things are incorrect. Green, syrupy things are apraxic. If something is cystic and not syrupy then it is apraxic. Kind things are cystic. If something is incorrect then it is antennal. All apraxic things are antennal. All zany, incorrect things are congealed. If Tracey is syrupy then Tracey is incorrect. Tracey is not cystic.", "logic": "\nSyrupy(tracey)\nCongealed(tracey)\nCongealed(salli)\nforall x (Syrupy(x) and Congealed(x) -> Incorrect(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) and Syrupy(x) -> Apraxic(x))\nforall x (Cystic(x) and not Syrupy(x) -> Apraxic(x))\nforall x (Antennal(x) -> Cystic(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Apraxic(x) -> Antennal(x))\nforall x (Zany(x) and Incorrect(x) -> Congealed(x))\nSyrupy(tracey) -> Incorrect(tracey)\n\nnot Cystic(tracey)\n\nSyrupy(tracey) and Syrupy(tracey) -> Incorrect(tracey) -> therefore Incorrect(tracey) Incorrect(tracey) and forall x (Incorrect(x) -> Antennal(x)) -> therefore Antennal(tracey) Antennal(tracey) and forall x (Antennal(x) -> Cystic(x)) -> therefore Cystic(tracey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Gay is causal. Gay is indicative. Kirbee is indicative. Smart, indicative things are total. Green, causal things are internal. If something is based and not causal then it is internal. Kind things are based. If something is total then it is castled. All internal things are castled. All autogamic, total things are indicative. If Gay is causal then Gay is total. Kirbee is not based.", "logic": "\nCausal(gay)\nIndicative(gay)\nIndicative(kirbee)\nforall x (Causal(x) and Indicative(x) -> Total(x))\nforall x (Total(x) and Causal(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Based(x) and not Causal(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Castled(x) -> Based(x))\nforall x (Total(x) -> Castled(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) -> Castled(x))\nforall x (Autogamic(x) and Total(x) -> Indicative(x))\nCausal(gay) -> Total(gay)\n\nnot Based(kirbee)\n\nforall x (Castled(x) -> Based(x)) <- forall x (Total(x) -> Castled(x)) <- forall x (Causal(x) and Indicative(x) -> Total(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Florry is mucoidal. Florry is polemical. Brittany is polemical. Smart, polemical things are iberian. Green, mucoidal things are coarctate. If something is arrhythmic and not mucoidal then it is coarctate. Kind things are arrhythmic. If something is iberian then it is unshapely. All coarctate things are unshapely. All impacted, iberian things are polemical. If Florry is mucoidal then Florry is iberian. Brittany is iberian.", "logic": "\nMucoidal(florry)\nPolemical(florry)\nPolemical(brittany)\nforall x (Mucoidal(x) and Polemical(x) -> Iberian(x))\nforall x (Iberian(x) and Mucoidal(x) -> Coarctate(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) and not Mucoidal(x) -> Coarctate(x))\nforall x (Unshapely(x) -> Arrhythmic(x))\nforall x (Iberian(x) -> Unshapely(x))\nforall x (Coarctate(x) -> Unshapely(x))\nforall x (Impacted(x) and Iberian(x) -> Polemical(x))\nMucoidal(florry) -> Iberian(florry)\n\nIberian(brittany)\n\nforall x (Mucoidal(x) and Polemical(x) -> Iberian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Cammy is unbiased. Cammy is foreign. Kaila is foreign. Smart, foreign things are parky. Green, unbiased things are dutiful. If something is abridged and not unbiased then it is dutiful. Kind things are abridged. If something is parky then it is diachronic. All dutiful things are diachronic. All ungusseted, parky things are foreign. If Cammy is unbiased then Cammy is parky. Kaila is not dutiful.", "logic": "\nUnbiased(cammy)\nForeign(cammy)\nForeign(kaila)\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Foreign(x) -> Parky(x))\nforall x (Parky(x) and Unbiased(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Abridged(x) and not Unbiased(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) -> Abridged(x))\nforall x (Parky(x) -> Diachronic(x))\nforall x (Dutiful(x) -> Diachronic(x))\nforall x (Ungusseted(x) and Parky(x) -> Foreign(x))\nUnbiased(cammy) -> Parky(cammy)\n\nnot Dutiful(kaila)\n\nforall x (Parky(x) and Unbiased(x) -> Dutiful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Donelle is laid. Donelle is biserrate. Welby is biserrate. Smart, biserrate things are athirst. Green, laid things are paperlike. If something is negroid and not laid then it is paperlike. Kind things are negroid. If something is athirst then it is catalatic. All paperlike things are catalatic. All bardic, athirst things are biserrate. If Donelle is laid then Donelle is athirst. Welby is catalatic.", "logic": "\nLaid(donelle)\nBiserrate(donelle)\nBiserrate(welby)\nforall x (Laid(x) and Biserrate(x) -> Athirst(x))\nforall x (Athirst(x) and Laid(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Negroid(x) and not Laid(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Catalatic(x) -> Negroid(x))\nforall x (Athirst(x) -> Catalatic(x))\nforall x (Paperlike(x) -> Catalatic(x))\nforall x (Bardic(x) and Athirst(x) -> Biserrate(x))\nLaid(donelle) -> Athirst(donelle)\n\nCatalatic(welby)\n\nforall x (Athirst(x) -> Catalatic(x)) <- forall x (Laid(x) and Biserrate(x) -> Athirst(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Carmina is orphic. Carmina is askance. Velma is askance. Smart, askance things are sulky. Green, orphic things are medicative. If something is unblessed and not orphic then it is medicative. Kind things are unblessed. If something is sulky then it is unsuited. All medicative things are unsuited. All veinal, sulky things are askance. If Carmina is orphic then Carmina is sulky. Velma is not veinal.", "logic": "\nOrphic(carmina)\nAskance(carmina)\nAskance(velma)\nforall x (Orphic(x) and Askance(x) -> Sulky(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) and Orphic(x) -> Medicative(x))\nforall x (Unblessed(x) and not Orphic(x) -> Medicative(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nforall x (Medicative(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nforall x (Veinal(x) and Sulky(x) -> Askance(x))\nOrphic(carmina) -> Sulky(carmina)\n\nnot Veinal(velma)\n\nnot Veinal(velma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Christos is unbaptized. Christos is jelled. Brunhilda is jelled. Smart, jelled things are maroc. Green, unbaptized things are galilean. If something is unassisted and not unbaptized then it is galilean. Kind things are unassisted. If something is maroc then it is bantoid. All galilean things are bantoid. All galvanic, maroc things are jelled. If Christos is unbaptized then Christos is maroc. Christos is galvanic.", "logic": "\nUnbaptized(christos)\nJelled(christos)\nJelled(brunhilda)\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) and Jelled(x) -> Maroc(x))\nforall x (Maroc(x) and Unbaptized(x) -> Galilean(x))\nforall x (Unassisted(x) and not Unbaptized(x) -> Galilean(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) -> Unassisted(x))\nforall x (Maroc(x) -> Bantoid(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) -> Bantoid(x))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Maroc(x) -> Jelled(x))\nUnbaptized(christos) -> Maroc(christos)\n\nGalvanic(christos)\n\nGalvanic(christos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "Karlen is bistroic. Rosamund is edentate. Fergus is acetose. If something is bistroic then it is not acetose. White things are not bistroic. If something is acetose and not ecdemic then it is beloved. If Karlen is bistroic then Karlen is ladened. All acetose things are not ladened. White things are not edentate. If something is runty and not ladened then it is not edentate. If something is edentate and not beloved then it is runty. Fergus is acetose.", "logic": "\nBistroic(karlen)\nEdentate(rosamund)\nAcetose(fergus)\nforall x (Bistroic(x) -> not Acetose(x))\nforall x (Beloved(x) -> not Bistroic(x))\nforall x (Acetose(x) and not Ecdemic(x) -> Beloved(x))\nBistroic(karlen) -> Ladened(karlen)\nforall x (Acetose(x) -> not Ladened(x))\nforall x (Beloved(x) -> not Edentate(x))\nforall x (Runty(x) and not Ladened(x) -> not Edentate(x))\nforall x (Edentate(x) and not Beloved(x) -> Runty(x))\n\nAcetose(fergus)\n\ntherefore Acetose(fergus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "Adriana is extradural. Winn is forward. Dea is aslant. If something is extradural then it is not aslant. White things are not extradural. If something is aslant and not whatsoever then it is crowded. If Adriana is extradural then Adriana is cushy. All aslant things are not cushy. White things are not forward. If something is aggregate and not cushy then it is not forward. If something is forward and not crowded then it is aggregate. Winn is not forward.", "logic": "\nExtradural(adriana)\nForward(winn)\nAslant(dea)\nforall x (Extradural(x) -> not Aslant(x))\nforall x (Crowded(x) -> not Extradural(x))\nforall x (Aslant(x) and not Whatsoever(x) -> Crowded(x))\nExtradural(adriana) -> Cushy(adriana)\nforall x (Aslant(x) -> not Cushy(x))\nforall x (Crowded(x) -> not Forward(x))\nforall x (Aggregate(x) and not Cushy(x) -> not Forward(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) and not Crowded(x) -> Aggregate(x))\n\nnot Forward(winn)\n\ntherefore Forward(winn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "Whitby is petalless. Sylvan is moved. Geri is aged. If something is petalless then it is not aged. White things are not petalless. If something is aged and not decent then it is raining. If Whitby is petalless then Whitby is snoopy. All aged things are not snoopy. White things are not moved. If something is lucifugal and not snoopy then it is not moved. If something is moved and not raining then it is lucifugal. Whitby is not aged.", "logic": "\nPetalless(whitby)\nMoved(sylvan)\nAged(geri)\nforall x (Petalless(x) -> not Aged(x))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> not Petalless(x))\nforall x (Aged(x) and not Decent(x) -> Raining(x))\nPetalless(whitby) -> Snoopy(whitby)\nforall x (Aged(x) -> not Snoopy(x))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> not Moved(x))\nforall x (Lucifugal(x) and not Snoopy(x) -> not Moved(x))\nforall x (Moved(x) and not Raining(x) -> Lucifugal(x))\n\nnot Aged(whitby)\n\nPetalless(whitby) and forall x (Petalless(x) -> not Aged(x)) -> therefore not Aged(whitby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "Karyl is cuneal. Bren is daft. Josiah is quaint. If something is cuneal then it is not quaint. White things are not cuneal. If something is quaint and not purebred then it is lienal. If Karyl is cuneal then Karyl is brawny. All quaint things are not brawny. White things are not daft. If something is appellate and not brawny then it is not daft. If something is daft and not lienal then it is appellate. Karyl is not brawny.", "logic": "\nCuneal(karyl)\nDaft(bren)\nQuaint(josiah)\nforall x (Cuneal(x) -> not Quaint(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> not Cuneal(x))\nforall x (Quaint(x) and not Purebred(x) -> Lienal(x))\nCuneal(karyl) -> Brawny(karyl)\nforall x (Quaint(x) -> not Brawny(x))\nforall x (Lienal(x) -> not Daft(x))\nforall x (Appellate(x) and not Brawny(x) -> not Daft(x))\nforall x (Daft(x) and not Lienal(x) -> Appellate(x))\n\nnot Brawny(karyl)\n\nCuneal(karyl) and Cuneal(karyl) -> Brawny(karyl) -> therefore Brawny(karyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "Ursola is orphaned. Netti is leased. Floris is swish. If something is orphaned then it is not swish. White things are not orphaned. If something is swish and not ungainly then it is gerundial. If Ursola is orphaned then Ursola is coriaceous. All swish things are not coriaceous. White things are not leased. If something is adoptive and not coriaceous then it is not leased. If something is leased and not gerundial then it is adoptive. Ursola is not gerundial.", "logic": "\nOrphaned(ursola)\nLeased(netti)\nSwish(floris)\nforall x (Orphaned(x) -> not Swish(x))\nforall x (Gerundial(x) -> not Orphaned(x))\nforall x (Swish(x) and not Ungainly(x) -> Gerundial(x))\nOrphaned(ursola) -> Coriaceous(ursola)\nforall x (Swish(x) -> not Coriaceous(x))\nforall x (Gerundial(x) -> not Leased(x))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) and not Coriaceous(x) -> not Leased(x))\nforall x (Leased(x) and not Gerundial(x) -> Adoptive(x))\n\nnot Gerundial(ursola)\n\nforall x (Swish(x) and not Ungainly(x) -> Gerundial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "Norry is wakeful. Rissa is deterrent. Wini is unknowable. If something is wakeful then it is not unknowable. White things are not wakeful. If something is unknowable and not jumentous then it is diagonal. If Norry is wakeful then Norry is untaped. All unknowable things are not untaped. White things are not deterrent. If something is extricable and not untaped then it is not deterrent. If something is deterrent and not diagonal then it is extricable. Wini is extricable.", "logic": "\nWakeful(norry)\nDeterrent(rissa)\nUnknowable(wini)\nforall x (Wakeful(x) -> not Unknowable(x))\nforall x (Diagonal(x) -> not Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Unknowable(x) and not Jumentous(x) -> Diagonal(x))\nWakeful(norry) -> Untaped(norry)\nforall x (Unknowable(x) -> not Untaped(x))\nforall x (Diagonal(x) -> not Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) and not Untaped(x) -> not Deterrent(x))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and not Diagonal(x) -> Extricable(x))\n\nExtricable(wini)\n\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and not Diagonal(x) -> Extricable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "Aurilia is subsequent. Lazlo is dizygous. Karel is anserine. If something is subsequent then it is not anserine. White things are not subsequent. If something is anserine and not jovial then it is coniferous. If Aurilia is subsequent then Aurilia is dysgenic. All anserine things are not dysgenic. White things are not dizygous. If something is wheeled and not dysgenic then it is not dizygous. If something is dizygous and not coniferous then it is wheeled. Lazlo is not jovial.", "logic": "\nSubsequent(aurilia)\nDizygous(lazlo)\nAnserine(karel)\nforall x (Subsequent(x) -> not Anserine(x))\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> not Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Anserine(x) and not Jovial(x) -> Coniferous(x))\nSubsequent(aurilia) -> Dysgenic(aurilia)\nforall x (Anserine(x) -> not Dysgenic(x))\nforall x (Coniferous(x) -> not Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) and not Dysgenic(x) -> not Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) and not Coniferous(x) -> Wheeled(x))\n\nnot Jovial(lazlo)\n\nnot Jovial(lazlo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "Nels is grudging. Marianne is unreleased. Erek is vaned. If something is grudging then it is not vaned. White things are not grudging. If something is vaned and not stuffy then it is fleet. If Nels is grudging then Nels is defiled. All vaned things are not defiled. White things are not unreleased. If something is autoecious and not defiled then it is not unreleased. If something is unreleased and not fleet then it is autoecious. Marianne is vaned.", "logic": "\nGrudging(nels)\nUnreleased(marianne)\nVaned(erek)\nforall x (Grudging(x) -> not Vaned(x))\nforall x (Fleet(x) -> not Grudging(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) and not Stuffy(x) -> Fleet(x))\nGrudging(nels) -> Defiled(nels)\nforall x (Vaned(x) -> not Defiled(x))\nforall x (Fleet(x) -> not Unreleased(x))\nforall x (Autoecious(x) and not Defiled(x) -> not Unreleased(x))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) and not Fleet(x) -> Autoecious(x))\n\nVaned(marianne)\n\nVaned(marianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2246"} {"premises": "The valentia is larghetto. The valentia pore the antonius. The valentia cajole the antonius. The antonius is pyrectic. The antonius pore the silas. The antonius cajole the valentia. The silas does not chase the valentia. The silas change the antonius. The silas is droopy. The silas pore the valentia. The silas does not visit the valentia. The silas cajole the antonius. If something is droopy and it cajole the antonius then it is larghetto. If something pore the silas then it does not chase the silas. If something is droopy and pyrectic then it change the silas. If the antonius is effusive then the antonius is not larghetto. If something pore the valentia and it is larghetto then it pore the silas. If something change the antonius then it pore the antonius. If something change the silas then the silas is modular. If something pore the valentia and the valentia pore the antonius then the antonius is modular. The silas is droopy.", "logic": "\nLarghetto(valentia)\nPore(valentia, antonius)\nCajole(valentia, antonius)\nPyrectic(antonius)\nPore(antonius, silas)\nCajole(antonius, valentia)\nnot Change(silas, valentia)\nChange(silas, antonius)\nDroopy(silas)\nPore(silas, valentia)\nnot Cajole(silas, valentia)\nCajole(silas, antonius)\nforall x (Droopy(x) and Cajole(x, antonius) -> Larghetto(x))\nforall x (Pore(x, silas) -> not Change(x, silas))\nforall x (Droopy(x) and Pyrectic(x) -> Change(x, silas))\nEffusive(antonius) -> not Larghetto(antonius)\nforall x (Pore(x, valentia) and Larghetto(x) -> Pore(x, silas))\nforall x (Change(x, antonius) -> Pore(x, antonius))\nforall x (Change(x, silas) -> Modular(silas))\nforall x (Pore(x, valentia) and Pore(valentia, antonius) -> Modular(antonius))\n\nDroopy(silas)\n\ntherefore Droopy(silas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The jillana is banal. The jillana pelt the theresina. The jillana import the theresina. The theresina is parlous. The theresina pelt the jocelyne. The theresina import the jillana. The jocelyne does not chase the jillana. The jocelyne educate the theresina. The jocelyne is slaty. The jocelyne pelt the jillana. The jocelyne does not visit the jillana. The jocelyne import the theresina. If something is slaty and it import the theresina then it is banal. If something pelt the jocelyne then it does not chase the jocelyne. If something is slaty and parlous then it educate the jocelyne. If the theresina is damp then the theresina is not banal. If something pelt the jillana and it is banal then it pelt the jocelyne. If something educate the theresina then it pelt the theresina. If something educate the jocelyne then the jocelyne is ruritanian. If something pelt the jillana and the jillana pelt the theresina then the theresina is ruritanian. The jocelyne is not slaty.", "logic": "\nBanal(jillana)\nPelt(jillana, theresina)\nImport(jillana, theresina)\nParlous(theresina)\nPelt(theresina, jocelyne)\nImport(theresina, jillana)\nnot Educate(jocelyne, jillana)\nEducate(jocelyne, theresina)\nSlaty(jocelyne)\nPelt(jocelyne, jillana)\nnot Import(jocelyne, jillana)\nImport(jocelyne, theresina)\nforall x (Slaty(x) and Import(x, theresina) -> Banal(x))\nforall x (Pelt(x, jocelyne) -> not Educate(x, jocelyne))\nforall x (Slaty(x) and Parlous(x) -> Educate(x, jocelyne))\nDamp(theresina) -> not Banal(theresina)\nforall x (Pelt(x, jillana) and Banal(x) -> Pelt(x, jocelyne))\nforall x (Educate(x, theresina) -> Pelt(x, theresina))\nforall x (Educate(x, jocelyne) -> Ruritanian(jocelyne))\nforall x (Pelt(x, jillana) and Pelt(jillana, theresina) -> Ruritanian(theresina))\n\nnot Slaty(jocelyne)\n\ntherefore Slaty(jocelyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The stefa is prayerful. The stefa humor the freddie. The stefa infiltrate the freddie. The freddie is bipolar. The freddie humor the shaine. The freddie infiltrate the stefa. The shaine does not chase the stefa. The shaine aurify the freddie. The shaine is kooky. The shaine humor the stefa. The shaine does not visit the stefa. The shaine infiltrate the freddie. If something is kooky and it infiltrate the freddie then it is prayerful. If something humor the shaine then it does not chase the shaine. If something is kooky and bipolar then it aurify the shaine. If the freddie is ulcerated then the freddie is not prayerful. If something humor the stefa and it is prayerful then it humor the shaine. If something aurify the freddie then it humor the freddie. If something aurify the shaine then the shaine is rustling. If something humor the stefa and the stefa humor the freddie then the freddie is rustling. The freddie is rustling.", "logic": "\nPrayerful(stefa)\nHumor(stefa, freddie)\nInfiltrate(stefa, freddie)\nBipolar(freddie)\nHumor(freddie, shaine)\nInfiltrate(freddie, stefa)\nnot Aurify(shaine, stefa)\nAurify(shaine, freddie)\nKooky(shaine)\nHumor(shaine, stefa)\nnot Infiltrate(shaine, stefa)\nInfiltrate(shaine, freddie)\nforall x (Kooky(x) and Infiltrate(x, freddie) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Humor(x, shaine) -> not Aurify(x, shaine))\nforall x (Kooky(x) and Bipolar(x) -> Aurify(x, shaine))\nUlcerated(freddie) -> not Prayerful(freddie)\nforall x (Humor(x, stefa) and Prayerful(x) -> Humor(x, shaine))\nforall x (Aurify(x, freddie) -> Humor(x, freddie))\nforall x (Aurify(x, shaine) -> Rustling(shaine))\nforall x (Humor(x, stefa) and Humor(stefa, freddie) -> Rustling(freddie))\n\nRustling(freddie)\n\nHumor(shaine, stefa) and Humor(stefa, freddie) and forall x (Humor(x, stefa) and Humor(stefa, freddie) -> Rustling(freddie)) -> therefore Rustling(freddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The janis is different. The janis escalate the janey. The janis indwell the janey. The janey is workaday. The janey escalate the lorianne. The janey indwell the janis. The lorianne does not chase the janis. The lorianne conflate the janey. The lorianne is valuable. The lorianne escalate the janis. The lorianne does not visit the janis. The lorianne indwell the janey. If something is valuable and it indwell the janey then it is different. If something escalate the lorianne then it does not chase the lorianne. If something is valuable and workaday then it conflate the lorianne. If the janey is diffuse then the janey is not different. If something escalate the janis and it is different then it escalate the lorianne. If something conflate the janey then it escalate the janey. If something conflate the lorianne then the lorianne is trilingual. If something escalate the janis and the janis escalate the janey then the janey is trilingual. The janey is not trilingual.", "logic": "\nDifferent(janis)\nEscalate(janis, janey)\nIndwell(janis, janey)\nWorkaday(janey)\nEscalate(janey, lorianne)\nIndwell(janey, janis)\nnot Conflate(lorianne, janis)\nConflate(lorianne, janey)\nValuable(lorianne)\nEscalate(lorianne, janis)\nnot Indwell(lorianne, janis)\nIndwell(lorianne, janey)\nforall x (Valuable(x) and Indwell(x, janey) -> Different(x))\nforall x (Escalate(x, lorianne) -> not Conflate(x, lorianne))\nforall x (Valuable(x) and Workaday(x) -> Conflate(x, lorianne))\nDiffuse(janey) -> not Different(janey)\nforall x (Escalate(x, janis) and Different(x) -> Escalate(x, lorianne))\nforall x (Conflate(x, janey) -> Escalate(x, janey))\nforall x (Conflate(x, lorianne) -> Trilingual(lorianne))\nforall x (Escalate(x, janis) and Escalate(janis, janey) -> Trilingual(janey))\n\nnot Trilingual(janey)\n\nEscalate(lorianne, janis) and Escalate(janis, janey) and forall x (Escalate(x, janis) and Escalate(janis, janey) -> Trilingual(janey)) -> therefore Trilingual(janey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The flo is gladsome. The flo bequeath the garrott. The flo recapture the garrott. The garrott is anorectic. The garrott bequeath the shellie. The garrott recapture the flo. The shellie does not chase the flo. The shellie virilise the garrott. The shellie is deciphered. The shellie bequeath the flo. The shellie does not visit the flo. The shellie recapture the garrott. If something is deciphered and it recapture the garrott then it is gladsome. If something bequeath the shellie then it does not chase the shellie. If something is deciphered and anorectic then it virilise the shellie. If the garrott is embryonal then the garrott is not gladsome. If something bequeath the flo and it is gladsome then it bequeath the shellie. If something virilise the garrott then it bequeath the garrott. If something virilise the shellie then the shellie is granted. If something bequeath the flo and the flo bequeath the garrott then the garrott is granted. The shellie bequeath the shellie.", "logic": "\nGladsome(flo)\nBequeath(flo, garrott)\nRecapture(flo, garrott)\nAnorectic(garrott)\nBequeath(garrott, shellie)\nRecapture(garrott, flo)\nnot Virilise(shellie, flo)\nVirilise(shellie, garrott)\nDeciphered(shellie)\nBequeath(shellie, flo)\nnot Recapture(shellie, flo)\nRecapture(shellie, garrott)\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Recapture(x, garrott) -> Gladsome(x))\nforall x (Bequeath(x, shellie) -> not Virilise(x, shellie))\nforall x (Deciphered(x) and Anorectic(x) -> Virilise(x, shellie))\nEmbryonal(garrott) -> not Gladsome(garrott)\nforall x (Bequeath(x, flo) and Gladsome(x) -> Bequeath(x, shellie))\nforall x (Virilise(x, garrott) -> Bequeath(x, garrott))\nforall x (Virilise(x, shellie) -> Granted(shellie))\nforall x (Bequeath(x, flo) and Bequeath(flo, garrott) -> Granted(garrott))\n\nBequeath(shellie, shellie)\n\nDeciphered(shellie) and Recapture(shellie, garrott) and forall x (Deciphered(x) and Recapture(x, garrott) -> Gladsome(x)) -> therefore Gladsome(shellie) Bequeath(shellie, flo) and Gladsome(shellie) and forall x (Bequeath(x, flo) and Gladsome(x) -> Bequeath(x, shellie)) -> therefore Bequeath(shellie, shellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The ryann is optimum. The ryann hare the blaine. The ryann rant the blaine. The blaine is gloomful. The blaine hare the haywood. The blaine rant the ryann. The haywood does not chase the ryann. The haywood nudge the blaine. The haywood is shattering. The haywood hare the ryann. The haywood does not visit the ryann. The haywood rant the blaine. If something is shattering and it rant the blaine then it is optimum. If something hare the haywood then it does not chase the haywood. If something is shattering and gloomful then it nudge the haywood. If the blaine is arthralgic then the blaine is not optimum. If something hare the ryann and it is optimum then it hare the haywood. If something nudge the blaine then it hare the blaine. If something nudge the haywood then the haywood is riming. If something hare the ryann and the ryann hare the blaine then the blaine is riming. The haywood does not like the haywood.", "logic": "\nOptimum(ryann)\nHare(ryann, blaine)\nRant(ryann, blaine)\nGloomful(blaine)\nHare(blaine, haywood)\nRant(blaine, ryann)\nnot Nudge(haywood, ryann)\nNudge(haywood, blaine)\nShattering(haywood)\nHare(haywood, ryann)\nnot Rant(haywood, ryann)\nRant(haywood, blaine)\nforall x (Shattering(x) and Rant(x, blaine) -> Optimum(x))\nforall x (Hare(x, haywood) -> not Nudge(x, haywood))\nforall x (Shattering(x) and Gloomful(x) -> Nudge(x, haywood))\nArthralgic(blaine) -> not Optimum(blaine)\nforall x (Hare(x, ryann) and Optimum(x) -> Hare(x, haywood))\nforall x (Nudge(x, blaine) -> Hare(x, blaine))\nforall x (Nudge(x, haywood) -> Riming(haywood))\nforall x (Hare(x, ryann) and Hare(ryann, blaine) -> Riming(blaine))\n\nnot Hare(haywood, haywood)\n\nShattering(haywood) and Rant(haywood, blaine) and forall x (Shattering(x) and Rant(x, blaine) -> Optimum(x)) -> therefore Optimum(haywood) Hare(haywood, ryann) and Optimum(haywood) and forall x (Hare(x, ryann) and Optimum(x) -> Hare(x, haywood)) -> therefore Hare(haywood, haywood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The mack is vapourific. The mack pupate the marcia. The mack bottleneck the marcia. The marcia is parttime. The marcia pupate the vlad. The marcia bottleneck the mack. The vlad does not chase the mack. The vlad weaponize the marcia. The vlad is ennobling. The vlad pupate the mack. The vlad does not visit the mack. The vlad bottleneck the marcia. If something is ennobling and it bottleneck the marcia then it is vapourific. If something pupate the vlad then it does not chase the vlad. If something is ennobling and parttime then it weaponize the vlad. If the marcia is spiral then the marcia is not vapourific. If something pupate the mack and it is vapourific then it pupate the vlad. If something weaponize the marcia then it pupate the marcia. If something weaponize the vlad then the vlad is unfueled. If something pupate the mack and the mack pupate the marcia then the marcia is unfueled. The vlad does not chase the vlad.", "logic": "\nVapourific(mack)\nPupate(mack, marcia)\nBottleneck(mack, marcia)\nParttime(marcia)\nPupate(marcia, vlad)\nBottleneck(marcia, mack)\nnot Weaponize(vlad, mack)\nWeaponize(vlad, marcia)\nEnnobling(vlad)\nPupate(vlad, mack)\nnot Bottleneck(vlad, mack)\nBottleneck(vlad, marcia)\nforall x (Ennobling(x) and Bottleneck(x, marcia) -> Vapourific(x))\nforall x (Pupate(x, vlad) -> not Weaponize(x, vlad))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) and Parttime(x) -> Weaponize(x, vlad))\nSpiral(marcia) -> not Vapourific(marcia)\nforall x (Pupate(x, mack) and Vapourific(x) -> Pupate(x, vlad))\nforall x (Weaponize(x, marcia) -> Pupate(x, marcia))\nforall x (Weaponize(x, vlad) -> Unfueled(vlad))\nforall x (Pupate(x, mack) and Pupate(mack, marcia) -> Unfueled(marcia))\n\nnot Weaponize(vlad, vlad)\n\nEnnobling(vlad) and Bottleneck(vlad, marcia) and forall x (Ennobling(x) and Bottleneck(x, marcia) -> Vapourific(x)) -> therefore Vapourific(vlad) Pupate(vlad, mack) and Vapourific(vlad) and forall x (Pupate(x, mack) and Vapourific(x) -> Pupate(x, vlad)) -> therefore Pupate(vlad, vlad) Pupate(vlad, vlad) and forall x (Pupate(x, vlad) -> not Weaponize(x, vlad)) -> therefore not Weaponize(vlad, vlad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The elias is unrevived. The elias misgive the nicholle. The elias dazzle the nicholle. The nicholle is aramaic. The nicholle misgive the aurie. The nicholle dazzle the elias. The aurie does not chase the elias. The aurie eliminate the nicholle. The aurie is oaten. The aurie misgive the elias. The aurie does not visit the elias. The aurie dazzle the nicholle. If something is oaten and it dazzle the nicholle then it is unrevived. If something misgive the aurie then it does not chase the aurie. If something is oaten and aramaic then it eliminate the aurie. If the nicholle is absorbent then the nicholle is not unrevived. If something misgive the elias and it is unrevived then it misgive the aurie. If something eliminate the nicholle then it misgive the nicholle. If something eliminate the aurie then the aurie is thornless. If something misgive the elias and the elias misgive the nicholle then the nicholle is thornless. The aurie eliminate the aurie.", "logic": "\nUnrevived(elias)\nMisgive(elias, nicholle)\nDazzle(elias, nicholle)\nAramaic(nicholle)\nMisgive(nicholle, aurie)\nDazzle(nicholle, elias)\nnot Eliminate(aurie, elias)\nEliminate(aurie, nicholle)\nOaten(aurie)\nMisgive(aurie, elias)\nnot Dazzle(aurie, elias)\nDazzle(aurie, nicholle)\nforall x (Oaten(x) and Dazzle(x, nicholle) -> Unrevived(x))\nforall x (Misgive(x, aurie) -> not Eliminate(x, aurie))\nforall x (Oaten(x) and Aramaic(x) -> Eliminate(x, aurie))\nAbsorbent(nicholle) -> not Unrevived(nicholle)\nforall x (Misgive(x, elias) and Unrevived(x) -> Misgive(x, aurie))\nforall x (Eliminate(x, nicholle) -> Misgive(x, nicholle))\nforall x (Eliminate(x, aurie) -> Thornless(aurie))\nforall x (Misgive(x, elias) and Misgive(elias, nicholle) -> Thornless(nicholle))\n\nEliminate(aurie, aurie)\n\nOaten(aurie) and Dazzle(aurie, nicholle) and forall x (Oaten(x) and Dazzle(x, nicholle) -> Unrevived(x)) -> therefore Unrevived(aurie) Misgive(aurie, elias) and Unrevived(aurie) and forall x (Misgive(x, elias) and Unrevived(x) -> Misgive(x, aurie)) -> therefore Misgive(aurie, aurie) Misgive(aurie, aurie) and forall x (Misgive(x, aurie) -> not Eliminate(x, aurie)) -> therefore not Eliminate(aurie, aurie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The bird is charmed. The bird whisper the aeriell. The bird rend the aeriell. The aeriell is clubby. The aeriell whisper the vernice. The aeriell rend the bird. The vernice does not chase the bird. The vernice backlash the aeriell. The vernice is situated. The vernice whisper the bird. The vernice does not visit the bird. The vernice rend the aeriell. If something is situated and it rend the aeriell then it is charmed. If something whisper the vernice then it does not chase the vernice. If something is situated and clubby then it backlash the vernice. If the aeriell is legendary then the aeriell is not charmed. If something whisper the bird and it is charmed then it whisper the vernice. If something backlash the aeriell then it whisper the aeriell. If something backlash the vernice then the vernice is unfathomed. If something whisper the bird and the bird whisper the aeriell then the aeriell is unfathomed. The vernice is not unfathomed.", "logic": "\nCharmed(bird)\nWhisper(bird, aeriell)\nRend(bird, aeriell)\nClubby(aeriell)\nWhisper(aeriell, vernice)\nRend(aeriell, bird)\nnot Backlash(vernice, bird)\nBacklash(vernice, aeriell)\nSituated(vernice)\nWhisper(vernice, bird)\nnot Rend(vernice, bird)\nRend(vernice, aeriell)\nforall x (Situated(x) and Rend(x, aeriell) -> Charmed(x))\nforall x (Whisper(x, vernice) -> not Backlash(x, vernice))\nforall x (Situated(x) and Clubby(x) -> Backlash(x, vernice))\nLegendary(aeriell) -> not Charmed(aeriell)\nforall x (Whisper(x, bird) and Charmed(x) -> Whisper(x, vernice))\nforall x (Backlash(x, aeriell) -> Whisper(x, aeriell))\nforall x (Backlash(x, vernice) -> Unfathomed(vernice))\nforall x (Whisper(x, bird) and Whisper(bird, aeriell) -> Unfathomed(aeriell))\n\nnot Unfathomed(vernice)\n\nforall x (Backlash(x, vernice) -> Unfathomed(vernice)) <- forall x (Situated(x) and Clubby(x) -> Backlash(x, vernice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The alonso is libidinous. The alonso entrust the bobbie. The alonso keen the bobbie. The bobbie is humane. The bobbie entrust the peyter. The bobbie keen the alonso. The peyter does not chase the alonso. The peyter commentate the bobbie. The peyter is hapless. The peyter entrust the alonso. The peyter does not visit the alonso. The peyter keen the bobbie. If something is hapless and it keen the bobbie then it is libidinous. If something entrust the peyter then it does not chase the peyter. If something is hapless and humane then it commentate the peyter. If the bobbie is unbearable then the bobbie is not libidinous. If something entrust the alonso and it is libidinous then it entrust the peyter. If something commentate the bobbie then it entrust the bobbie. If something commentate the peyter then the peyter is libelous. If something entrust the alonso and the alonso entrust the bobbie then the bobbie is libelous. The alonso entrust the peyter.", "logic": "\nLibidinous(alonso)\nEntrust(alonso, bobbie)\nKeen(alonso, bobbie)\nHumane(bobbie)\nEntrust(bobbie, peyter)\nKeen(bobbie, alonso)\nnot Commentate(peyter, alonso)\nCommentate(peyter, bobbie)\nHapless(peyter)\nEntrust(peyter, alonso)\nnot Keen(peyter, alonso)\nKeen(peyter, bobbie)\nforall x (Hapless(x) and Keen(x, bobbie) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Entrust(x, peyter) -> not Commentate(x, peyter))\nforall x (Hapless(x) and Humane(x) -> Commentate(x, peyter))\nUnbearable(bobbie) -> not Libidinous(bobbie)\nforall x (Entrust(x, alonso) and Libidinous(x) -> Entrust(x, peyter))\nforall x (Commentate(x, bobbie) -> Entrust(x, bobbie))\nforall x (Commentate(x, peyter) -> Libelous(peyter))\nforall x (Entrust(x, alonso) and Entrust(alonso, bobbie) -> Libelous(bobbie))\n\nEntrust(alonso, peyter)\n\nforall x (Entrust(x, alonso) and Libidinous(x) -> Entrust(x, peyter)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The raquela is unframed. The raquela divorce the yonina. The raquela sick the yonina. The yonina is sanitised. The yonina divorce the lindy. The yonina sick the raquela. The lindy does not chase the raquela. The lindy sully the yonina. The lindy is twopenny. The lindy divorce the raquela. The lindy does not visit the raquela. The lindy sick the yonina. If something is twopenny and it sick the yonina then it is unframed. If something divorce the lindy then it does not chase the lindy. If something is twopenny and sanitised then it sully the lindy. If the yonina is aftermost then the yonina is not unframed. If something divorce the raquela and it is unframed then it divorce the lindy. If something sully the yonina then it divorce the yonina. If something sully the lindy then the lindy is homoerotic. If something divorce the raquela and the raquela divorce the yonina then the yonina is homoerotic. The yonina is not unframed.", "logic": "\nUnframed(raquela)\nDivorce(raquela, yonina)\nSick(raquela, yonina)\nSanitised(yonina)\nDivorce(yonina, lindy)\nSick(yonina, raquela)\nnot Sully(lindy, raquela)\nSully(lindy, yonina)\nTwopenny(lindy)\nDivorce(lindy, raquela)\nnot Sick(lindy, raquela)\nSick(lindy, yonina)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Sick(x, yonina) -> Unframed(x))\nforall x (Divorce(x, lindy) -> not Sully(x, lindy))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Sanitised(x) -> Sully(x, lindy))\nAftermost(yonina) -> not Unframed(yonina)\nforall x (Divorce(x, raquela) and Unframed(x) -> Divorce(x, lindy))\nforall x (Sully(x, yonina) -> Divorce(x, yonina))\nforall x (Sully(x, lindy) -> Homoerotic(lindy))\nforall x (Divorce(x, raquela) and Divorce(raquela, yonina) -> Homoerotic(yonina))\n\nnot Unframed(yonina)\n\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Sick(x, yonina) -> Unframed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The monty is gooey. The monty hitch the marc. The monty dribble the marc. The marc is totaled. The marc hitch the sidonnie. The marc dribble the monty. The sidonnie does not chase the monty. The sidonnie laze the marc. The sidonnie is manque. The sidonnie hitch the monty. The sidonnie does not visit the monty. The sidonnie dribble the marc. If something is manque and it dribble the marc then it is gooey. If something hitch the sidonnie then it does not chase the sidonnie. If something is manque and totaled then it laze the sidonnie. If the marc is sublingual then the marc is not gooey. If something hitch the monty and it is gooey then it hitch the sidonnie. If something laze the marc then it hitch the marc. If something laze the sidonnie then the sidonnie is boss. If something hitch the monty and the monty hitch the marc then the marc is boss. The monty laze the sidonnie.", "logic": "\nGooey(monty)\nHitch(monty, marc)\nDribble(monty, marc)\nTotaled(marc)\nHitch(marc, sidonnie)\nDribble(marc, monty)\nnot Laze(sidonnie, monty)\nLaze(sidonnie, marc)\nManque(sidonnie)\nHitch(sidonnie, monty)\nnot Dribble(sidonnie, monty)\nDribble(sidonnie, marc)\nforall x (Manque(x) and Dribble(x, marc) -> Gooey(x))\nforall x (Hitch(x, sidonnie) -> not Laze(x, sidonnie))\nforall x (Manque(x) and Totaled(x) -> Laze(x, sidonnie))\nSublingual(marc) -> not Gooey(marc)\nforall x (Hitch(x, monty) and Gooey(x) -> Hitch(x, sidonnie))\nforall x (Laze(x, marc) -> Hitch(x, marc))\nforall x (Laze(x, sidonnie) -> Boss(sidonnie))\nforall x (Hitch(x, monty) and Hitch(monty, marc) -> Boss(marc))\n\nLaze(monty, sidonnie)\n\nforall x (Manque(x) and Totaled(x) -> Laze(x, sidonnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The myna is mastoidal. The myna deport the mikhail. The myna implement the mikhail. The mikhail is atrophied. The mikhail deport the chandler. The mikhail implement the myna. The chandler does not chase the myna. The chandler inch the mikhail. The chandler is withered. The chandler deport the myna. The chandler does not visit the myna. The chandler implement the mikhail. If something is withered and it implement the mikhail then it is mastoidal. If something deport the chandler then it does not chase the chandler. If something is withered and atrophied then it inch the chandler. If the mikhail is stumpy then the mikhail is not mastoidal. If something deport the myna and it is mastoidal then it deport the chandler. If something inch the mikhail then it deport the mikhail. If something inch the chandler then the chandler is oratorical. If something deport the myna and the myna deport the mikhail then the mikhail is oratorical. The myna is not withered.", "logic": "\nMastoidal(myna)\nDeport(myna, mikhail)\nImplement(myna, mikhail)\nAtrophied(mikhail)\nDeport(mikhail, chandler)\nImplement(mikhail, myna)\nnot Inch(chandler, myna)\nInch(chandler, mikhail)\nWithered(chandler)\nDeport(chandler, myna)\nnot Implement(chandler, myna)\nImplement(chandler, mikhail)\nforall x (Withered(x) and Implement(x, mikhail) -> Mastoidal(x))\nforall x (Deport(x, chandler) -> not Inch(x, chandler))\nforall x (Withered(x) and Atrophied(x) -> Inch(x, chandler))\nStumpy(mikhail) -> not Mastoidal(mikhail)\nforall x (Deport(x, myna) and Mastoidal(x) -> Deport(x, chandler))\nforall x (Inch(x, mikhail) -> Deport(x, mikhail))\nforall x (Inch(x, chandler) -> Oratorical(chandler))\nforall x (Deport(x, myna) and Deport(myna, mikhail) -> Oratorical(mikhail))\n\nnot Withered(myna)\n\nnot Withered(myna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The bernadine is springless. The bernadine autotomize the fatima. The bernadine bloat the fatima. The fatima is flying. The fatima autotomize the vinita. The fatima bloat the bernadine. The vinita does not chase the bernadine. The vinita agonise the fatima. The vinita is interred. The vinita autotomize the bernadine. The vinita does not visit the bernadine. The vinita bloat the fatima. If something is interred and it bloat the fatima then it is springless. If something autotomize the vinita then it does not chase the vinita. If something is interred and flying then it agonise the vinita. If the fatima is wholesale then the fatima is not springless. If something autotomize the bernadine and it is springless then it autotomize the vinita. If something agonise the fatima then it autotomize the fatima. If something agonise the vinita then the vinita is techy. If something autotomize the bernadine and the bernadine autotomize the fatima then the fatima is techy. The vinita bloat the vinita.", "logic": "\nSpringless(bernadine)\nAutotomize(bernadine, fatima)\nBloat(bernadine, fatima)\nFlying(fatima)\nAutotomize(fatima, vinita)\nBloat(fatima, bernadine)\nnot Agonise(vinita, bernadine)\nAgonise(vinita, fatima)\nInterred(vinita)\nAutotomize(vinita, bernadine)\nnot Bloat(vinita, bernadine)\nBloat(vinita, fatima)\nforall x (Interred(x) and Bloat(x, fatima) -> Springless(x))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, vinita) -> not Agonise(x, vinita))\nforall x (Interred(x) and Flying(x) -> Agonise(x, vinita))\nWholesale(fatima) -> not Springless(fatima)\nforall x (Autotomize(x, bernadine) and Springless(x) -> Autotomize(x, vinita))\nforall x (Agonise(x, fatima) -> Autotomize(x, fatima))\nforall x (Agonise(x, vinita) -> Techy(vinita))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, bernadine) and Autotomize(bernadine, fatima) -> Techy(fatima))\n\nBloat(vinita, vinita)\n\nBloat(vinita, vinita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The gershon is unpleasing. The gershon shimmer the marney. The gershon coddle the marney. The marney is eager. The marney shimmer the saudra. The marney coddle the gershon. The saudra does not chase the gershon. The saudra coronate the marney. The saudra is noted. The saudra shimmer the gershon. The saudra does not visit the gershon. The saudra coddle the marney. If something is noted and it coddle the marney then it is unpleasing. If something shimmer the saudra then it does not chase the saudra. If something is noted and eager then it coronate the saudra. If the marney is nescient then the marney is not unpleasing. If something shimmer the gershon and it is unpleasing then it shimmer the saudra. If something coronate the marney then it shimmer the marney. If something coronate the saudra then the saudra is copasetic. If something shimmer the gershon and the gershon shimmer the marney then the marney is copasetic. The marney does not visit the marney.", "logic": "\nUnpleasing(gershon)\nShimmer(gershon, marney)\nCoddle(gershon, marney)\nEager(marney)\nShimmer(marney, saudra)\nCoddle(marney, gershon)\nnot Coronate(saudra, gershon)\nCoronate(saudra, marney)\nNoted(saudra)\nShimmer(saudra, gershon)\nnot Coddle(saudra, gershon)\nCoddle(saudra, marney)\nforall x (Noted(x) and Coddle(x, marney) -> Unpleasing(x))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, saudra) -> not Coronate(x, saudra))\nforall x (Noted(x) and Eager(x) -> Coronate(x, saudra))\nNescient(marney) -> not Unpleasing(marney)\nforall x (Shimmer(x, gershon) and Unpleasing(x) -> Shimmer(x, saudra))\nforall x (Coronate(x, marney) -> Shimmer(x, marney))\nforall x (Coronate(x, saudra) -> Copasetic(saudra))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, gershon) and Shimmer(gershon, marney) -> Copasetic(marney))\n\nnot Coddle(marney, marney)\n\nnot Coddle(marney, marney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The hermine is virtuous. The hermine laicise the lucian. The hermine cannulise the lucian. The lucian is leftover. The lucian laicise the janella. The lucian cannulise the hermine. The janella does not chase the hermine. The janella clarion the lucian. The janella is yucky. The janella laicise the hermine. The janella does not visit the hermine. The janella cannulise the lucian. If something is yucky and it cannulise the lucian then it is virtuous. If something laicise the janella then it does not chase the janella. If something is yucky and leftover then it clarion the janella. If the lucian is starring then the lucian is not virtuous. If something laicise the hermine and it is virtuous then it laicise the janella. If something clarion the lucian then it laicise the lucian. If something clarion the janella then the janella is mournful. If something laicise the hermine and the hermine laicise the lucian then the lucian is mournful. The lucian is starring.", "logic": "\nVirtuous(hermine)\nLaicise(hermine, lucian)\nCannulise(hermine, lucian)\nLeftover(lucian)\nLaicise(lucian, janella)\nCannulise(lucian, hermine)\nnot Clarion(janella, hermine)\nClarion(janella, lucian)\nYucky(janella)\nLaicise(janella, hermine)\nnot Cannulise(janella, hermine)\nCannulise(janella, lucian)\nforall x (Yucky(x) and Cannulise(x, lucian) -> Virtuous(x))\nforall x (Laicise(x, janella) -> not Clarion(x, janella))\nforall x (Yucky(x) and Leftover(x) -> Clarion(x, janella))\nStarring(lucian) -> not Virtuous(lucian)\nforall x (Laicise(x, hermine) and Virtuous(x) -> Laicise(x, janella))\nforall x (Clarion(x, lucian) -> Laicise(x, lucian))\nforall x (Clarion(x, janella) -> Mournful(janella))\nforall x (Laicise(x, hermine) and Laicise(hermine, lucian) -> Mournful(lucian))\n\nStarring(lucian)\n\nStarring(lucian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-681"} {"premises": "The bharat buccaneer the gabe. The terrell understock the bharat. The gabe monopolise the terrell. The tandie monopolise the bharat. If something monopolise the terrell and it buccaneer the terrell then the terrell is antitumor. If something is antitumor and it understock the bharat then it is aldermanic. If something buccaneer the bharat and it understock the gabe then the gabe is overbold. If the terrell understock the gabe then the gabe buccaneer the tandie. If something buccaneer the gabe then the gabe buccaneer the terrell. If something monopolise the gabe and it buccaneer the terrell then the gabe is overbold. If something is zionist and it monopolise the gabe then it buccaneer the tandie. If something is antitumor and it buccaneer the terrell then the terrell understock the bharat. The terrell understock the bharat.", "logic": "\nBuccaneer(bharat, gabe)\nUnderstock(terrell, bharat)\nMonopolise(gabe, terrell)\nMonopolise(tandie, bharat)\nforall x (Monopolise(x, terrell) and Buccaneer(x, terrell) -> Antitumor(terrell))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) and Understock(x, bharat) -> Aldermanic(x))\nforall x (Buccaneer(x, bharat) and Understock(x, gabe) -> Overbold(gabe))\nUnderstock(terrell, gabe) -> Buccaneer(gabe, tandie)\nforall x (Buccaneer(x, gabe) -> Buccaneer(gabe, terrell))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, gabe) and Buccaneer(x, terrell) -> Overbold(gabe))\nforall x (Zionist(x) and Monopolise(x, gabe) -> Buccaneer(x, tandie))\nforall x (Antitumor(x) and Buccaneer(x, terrell) -> Understock(terrell, bharat))\n\nUnderstock(terrell, bharat)\n\ntherefore Understock(terrell, bharat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The gera outvote the fredia. The pepi devaluate the gera. The fredia package the pepi. The arel package the gera. If something package the pepi and it outvote the pepi then the pepi is clxv. If something is clxv and it devaluate the gera then it is prongy. If something outvote the gera and it devaluate the fredia then the fredia is cosmic. If the pepi devaluate the fredia then the fredia outvote the arel. If something outvote the fredia then the fredia outvote the pepi. If something package the fredia and it outvote the pepi then the fredia is cosmic. If something is crescendo and it package the fredia then it outvote the arel. If something is clxv and it outvote the pepi then the pepi devaluate the gera. The pepi does not visit the gera.", "logic": "\nOutvote(gera, fredia)\nDevaluate(pepi, gera)\nPackage(fredia, pepi)\nPackage(arel, gera)\nforall x (Package(x, pepi) and Outvote(x, pepi) -> Clxv(pepi))\nforall x (Clxv(x) and Devaluate(x, gera) -> Prongy(x))\nforall x (Outvote(x, gera) and Devaluate(x, fredia) -> Cosmic(fredia))\nDevaluate(pepi, fredia) -> Outvote(fredia, arel)\nforall x (Outvote(x, fredia) -> Outvote(fredia, pepi))\nforall x (Package(x, fredia) and Outvote(x, pepi) -> Cosmic(fredia))\nforall x (Crescendo(x) and Package(x, fredia) -> Outvote(x, arel))\nforall x (Clxv(x) and Outvote(x, pepi) -> Devaluate(pepi, gera))\n\nnot Devaluate(pepi, gera)\n\ntherefore Devaluate(pepi, gera)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The bartolemo decrease the richardo. The cheston crystalise the bartolemo. The richardo spare the cheston. The giavani spare the bartolemo. If something spare the cheston and it decrease the cheston then the cheston is scratchy. If something is scratchy and it crystalise the bartolemo then it is incurved. If something decrease the bartolemo and it crystalise the richardo then the richardo is spirant. If the cheston crystalise the richardo then the richardo decrease the giavani. If something decrease the richardo then the richardo decrease the cheston. If something spare the richardo and it decrease the cheston then the richardo is spirant. If something is lifted and it spare the richardo then it decrease the giavani. If something is scratchy and it decrease the cheston then the cheston crystalise the bartolemo. The richardo decrease the cheston.", "logic": "\nDecrease(bartolemo, richardo)\nCrystalise(cheston, bartolemo)\nSpare(richardo, cheston)\nSpare(giavani, bartolemo)\nforall x (Spare(x, cheston) and Decrease(x, cheston) -> Scratchy(cheston))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Crystalise(x, bartolemo) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Decrease(x, bartolemo) and Crystalise(x, richardo) -> Spirant(richardo))\nCrystalise(cheston, richardo) -> Decrease(richardo, giavani)\nforall x (Decrease(x, richardo) -> Decrease(richardo, cheston))\nforall x (Spare(x, richardo) and Decrease(x, cheston) -> Spirant(richardo))\nforall x (Lifted(x) and Spare(x, richardo) -> Decrease(x, giavani))\nforall x (Scratchy(x) and Decrease(x, cheston) -> Crystalise(cheston, bartolemo))\n\nDecrease(richardo, cheston)\n\nDecrease(bartolemo, richardo) and forall x (Decrease(x, richardo) -> Decrease(richardo, cheston)) -> therefore Decrease(richardo, cheston)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The geraldo mill the rayshell. The kingston louden the geraldo. The rayshell clop the kingston. The ephraim clop the geraldo. If something clop the kingston and it mill the kingston then the kingston is decurved. If something is decurved and it louden the geraldo then it is burdened. If something mill the geraldo and it louden the rayshell then the rayshell is cluttered. If the kingston louden the rayshell then the rayshell mill the ephraim. If something mill the rayshell then the rayshell mill the kingston. If something clop the rayshell and it mill the kingston then the rayshell is cluttered. If something is slow and it clop the rayshell then it mill the ephraim. If something is decurved and it mill the kingston then the kingston louden the geraldo. The rayshell does not need the kingston.", "logic": "\nMill(geraldo, rayshell)\nLouden(kingston, geraldo)\nClop(rayshell, kingston)\nClop(ephraim, geraldo)\nforall x (Clop(x, kingston) and Mill(x, kingston) -> Decurved(kingston))\nforall x (Decurved(x) and Louden(x, geraldo) -> Burdened(x))\nforall x (Mill(x, geraldo) and Louden(x, rayshell) -> Cluttered(rayshell))\nLouden(kingston, rayshell) -> Mill(rayshell, ephraim)\nforall x (Mill(x, rayshell) -> Mill(rayshell, kingston))\nforall x (Clop(x, rayshell) and Mill(x, kingston) -> Cluttered(rayshell))\nforall x (Slow(x) and Clop(x, rayshell) -> Mill(x, ephraim))\nforall x (Decurved(x) and Mill(x, kingston) -> Louden(kingston, geraldo))\n\nnot Mill(rayshell, kingston)\n\nMill(geraldo, rayshell) and forall x (Mill(x, rayshell) -> Mill(rayshell, kingston)) -> therefore Mill(rayshell, kingston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The gonzales expect the salim. The brendan join the gonzales. The salim poultice the brendan. The stevana poultice the gonzales. If something poultice the brendan and it expect the brendan then the brendan is surface. If something is surface and it join the gonzales then it is prone. If something expect the gonzales and it join the salim then the salim is lamented. If the brendan join the salim then the salim expect the stevana. If something expect the salim then the salim expect the brendan. If something poultice the salim and it expect the brendan then the salim is lamented. If something is superior and it poultice the salim then it expect the stevana. If something is surface and it expect the brendan then the brendan join the gonzales. The brendan is surface.", "logic": "\nExpect(gonzales, salim)\nJoin(brendan, gonzales)\nPoultice(salim, brendan)\nPoultice(stevana, gonzales)\nforall x (Poultice(x, brendan) and Expect(x, brendan) -> Surface(brendan))\nforall x (Surface(x) and Join(x, gonzales) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Expect(x, gonzales) and Join(x, salim) -> Lamented(salim))\nJoin(brendan, salim) -> Expect(salim, stevana)\nforall x (Expect(x, salim) -> Expect(salim, brendan))\nforall x (Poultice(x, salim) and Expect(x, brendan) -> Lamented(salim))\nforall x (Superior(x) and Poultice(x, salim) -> Expect(x, stevana))\nforall x (Surface(x) and Expect(x, brendan) -> Join(brendan, gonzales))\n\nSurface(brendan)\n\nExpect(gonzales, salim) and forall x (Expect(x, salim) -> Expect(salim, brendan)) -> therefore Expect(salim, brendan) Poultice(salim, brendan) and Expect(salim, brendan) and forall x (Poultice(x, brendan) and Expect(x, brendan) -> Surface(brendan)) -> therefore Surface(brendan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The benito fabricate the juli. The malorie slit the benito. The juli revert the malorie. The halie revert the benito. If something revert the malorie and it fabricate the malorie then the malorie is sticky. If something is sticky and it slit the benito then it is propulsive. If something fabricate the benito and it slit the juli then the juli is gemmed. If the malorie slit the juli then the juli fabricate the halie. If something fabricate the juli then the juli fabricate the malorie. If something revert the juli and it fabricate the malorie then the juli is gemmed. If something is bewitched and it revert the juli then it fabricate the halie. If something is sticky and it fabricate the malorie then the malorie slit the benito. The malorie is not sticky.", "logic": "\nFabricate(benito, juli)\nSlit(malorie, benito)\nRevert(juli, malorie)\nRevert(halie, benito)\nforall x (Revert(x, malorie) and Fabricate(x, malorie) -> Sticky(malorie))\nforall x (Sticky(x) and Slit(x, benito) -> Propulsive(x))\nforall x (Fabricate(x, benito) and Slit(x, juli) -> Gemmed(juli))\nSlit(malorie, juli) -> Fabricate(juli, halie)\nforall x (Fabricate(x, juli) -> Fabricate(juli, malorie))\nforall x (Revert(x, juli) and Fabricate(x, malorie) -> Gemmed(juli))\nforall x (Bewitched(x) and Revert(x, juli) -> Fabricate(x, halie))\nforall x (Sticky(x) and Fabricate(x, malorie) -> Slit(malorie, benito))\n\nnot Sticky(malorie)\n\nFabricate(benito, juli) and forall x (Fabricate(x, juli) -> Fabricate(juli, malorie)) -> therefore Fabricate(juli, malorie) Revert(juli, malorie) and Fabricate(juli, malorie) and forall x (Revert(x, malorie) and Fabricate(x, malorie) -> Sticky(malorie)) -> therefore Sticky(malorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The nicolea domicile the marthe. The chris replant the nicolea. The marthe mechanise the chris. The vanya mechanise the nicolea. If something mechanise the chris and it domicile the chris then the chris is saclike. If something is saclike and it replant the nicolea then it is laudatory. If something domicile the nicolea and it replant the marthe then the marthe is spidery. If the chris replant the marthe then the marthe domicile the vanya. If something domicile the marthe then the marthe domicile the chris. If something mechanise the marthe and it domicile the chris then the marthe is spidery. If something is enormous and it mechanise the marthe then it domicile the vanya. If something is saclike and it domicile the chris then the chris replant the nicolea. The chris is laudatory.", "logic": "\nDomicile(nicolea, marthe)\nReplant(chris, nicolea)\nMechanise(marthe, chris)\nMechanise(vanya, nicolea)\nforall x (Mechanise(x, chris) and Domicile(x, chris) -> Saclike(chris))\nforall x (Saclike(x) and Replant(x, nicolea) -> Laudatory(x))\nforall x (Domicile(x, nicolea) and Replant(x, marthe) -> Spidery(marthe))\nReplant(chris, marthe) -> Domicile(marthe, vanya)\nforall x (Domicile(x, marthe) -> Domicile(marthe, chris))\nforall x (Mechanise(x, marthe) and Domicile(x, chris) -> Spidery(marthe))\nforall x (Enormous(x) and Mechanise(x, marthe) -> Domicile(x, vanya))\nforall x (Saclike(x) and Domicile(x, chris) -> Replant(chris, nicolea))\n\nLaudatory(chris)\n\nDomicile(nicolea, marthe) and forall x (Domicile(x, marthe) -> Domicile(marthe, chris)) -> therefore Domicile(marthe, chris) Mechanise(marthe, chris) and Domicile(marthe, chris) and forall x (Mechanise(x, chris) and Domicile(x, chris) -> Saclike(chris)) -> therefore Saclike(chris) Saclike(chris) and Replant(chris, nicolea) and forall x (Saclike(x) and Replant(x, nicolea) -> Laudatory(x)) -> therefore Laudatory(chris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The evonne submarine the judas. The rudolfo rouge the evonne. The judas speechify the rudolfo. The janeen speechify the evonne. If something speechify the rudolfo and it submarine the rudolfo then the rudolfo is parisian. If something is parisian and it rouge the evonne then it is unalloyed. If something submarine the evonne and it rouge the judas then the judas is nodulated. If the rudolfo rouge the judas then the judas submarine the janeen. If something submarine the judas then the judas submarine the rudolfo. If something speechify the judas and it submarine the rudolfo then the judas is nodulated. If something is reversed and it speechify the judas then it submarine the janeen. If something is parisian and it submarine the rudolfo then the rudolfo rouge the evonne. The rudolfo is not unalloyed.", "logic": "\nSubmarine(evonne, judas)\nRouge(rudolfo, evonne)\nSpeechify(judas, rudolfo)\nSpeechify(janeen, evonne)\nforall x (Speechify(x, rudolfo) and Submarine(x, rudolfo) -> Parisian(rudolfo))\nforall x (Parisian(x) and Rouge(x, evonne) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Submarine(x, evonne) and Rouge(x, judas) -> Nodulated(judas))\nRouge(rudolfo, judas) -> Submarine(judas, janeen)\nforall x (Submarine(x, judas) -> Submarine(judas, rudolfo))\nforall x (Speechify(x, judas) and Submarine(x, rudolfo) -> Nodulated(judas))\nforall x (Reversed(x) and Speechify(x, judas) -> Submarine(x, janeen))\nforall x (Parisian(x) and Submarine(x, rudolfo) -> Rouge(rudolfo, evonne))\n\nnot Unalloyed(rudolfo)\n\nSubmarine(evonne, judas) and forall x (Submarine(x, judas) -> Submarine(judas, rudolfo)) -> therefore Submarine(judas, rudolfo) Speechify(judas, rudolfo) and Submarine(judas, rudolfo) and forall x (Speechify(x, rudolfo) and Submarine(x, rudolfo) -> Parisian(rudolfo)) -> therefore Parisian(rudolfo) Parisian(rudolfo) and Rouge(rudolfo, evonne) and forall x (Parisian(x) and Rouge(x, evonne) -> Unalloyed(x)) -> therefore Unalloyed(rudolfo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The collete delight the paulina. The zane prove the collete. The paulina clang the zane. The midge clang the collete. If something clang the zane and it delight the zane then the zane is rouged. If something is rouged and it prove the collete then it is tart. If something delight the collete and it prove the paulina then the paulina is trembling. If the zane prove the paulina then the paulina delight the midge. If something delight the paulina then the paulina delight the zane. If something clang the paulina and it delight the zane then the paulina is trembling. If something is ignitible and it clang the paulina then it delight the midge. If something is rouged and it delight the zane then the zane prove the collete. The collete is not tart.", "logic": "\nDelight(collete, paulina)\nProve(zane, collete)\nClang(paulina, zane)\nClang(midge, collete)\nforall x (Clang(x, zane) and Delight(x, zane) -> Rouged(zane))\nforall x (Rouged(x) and Prove(x, collete) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Delight(x, collete) and Prove(x, paulina) -> Trembling(paulina))\nProve(zane, paulina) -> Delight(paulina, midge)\nforall x (Delight(x, paulina) -> Delight(paulina, zane))\nforall x (Clang(x, paulina) and Delight(x, zane) -> Trembling(paulina))\nforall x (Ignitible(x) and Clang(x, paulina) -> Delight(x, midge))\nforall x (Rouged(x) and Delight(x, zane) -> Prove(zane, collete))\n\nnot Tart(collete)\n\nforall x (Rouged(x) and Prove(x, collete) -> Tart(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The kalie honk the phyllys. The tonia rally the kalie. The phyllys canvass the tonia. The leon canvass the kalie. If something canvass the tonia and it honk the tonia then the tonia is pugnacious. If something is pugnacious and it rally the kalie then it is dreamed. If something honk the kalie and it rally the phyllys then the phyllys is dighted. If the tonia rally the phyllys then the phyllys honk the leon. If something honk the phyllys then the phyllys honk the tonia. If something canvass the phyllys and it honk the tonia then the phyllys is dighted. If something is isothermal and it canvass the phyllys then it honk the leon. If something is pugnacious and it honk the tonia then the tonia rally the kalie. The leon honk the leon.", "logic": "\nHonk(kalie, phyllys)\nRally(tonia, kalie)\nCanvass(phyllys, tonia)\nCanvass(leon, kalie)\nforall x (Canvass(x, tonia) and Honk(x, tonia) -> Pugnacious(tonia))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) and Rally(x, kalie) -> Dreamed(x))\nforall x (Honk(x, kalie) and Rally(x, phyllys) -> Dighted(phyllys))\nRally(tonia, phyllys) -> Honk(phyllys, leon)\nforall x (Honk(x, phyllys) -> Honk(phyllys, tonia))\nforall x (Canvass(x, phyllys) and Honk(x, tonia) -> Dighted(phyllys))\nforall x (Isothermal(x) and Canvass(x, phyllys) -> Honk(x, leon))\nforall x (Pugnacious(x) and Honk(x, tonia) -> Rally(tonia, kalie))\n\nHonk(leon, leon)\n\nforall x (Isothermal(x) and Canvass(x, phyllys) -> Honk(x, leon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The amandie disguise the shirlee. The giffard chat the amandie. The shirlee team the giffard. The antony team the amandie. If something team the giffard and it disguise the giffard then the giffard is gentle. If something is gentle and it chat the amandie then it is ultrasonic. If something disguise the amandie and it chat the shirlee then the shirlee is unsigned. If the giffard chat the shirlee then the shirlee disguise the antony. If something disguise the shirlee then the shirlee disguise the giffard. If something team the shirlee and it disguise the giffard then the shirlee is unsigned. If something is shrivelled and it team the shirlee then it disguise the antony. If something is gentle and it disguise the giffard then the giffard chat the amandie. The antony is not ultrasonic.", "logic": "\nDisguise(amandie, shirlee)\nChat(giffard, amandie)\nTeam(shirlee, giffard)\nTeam(antony, amandie)\nforall x (Team(x, giffard) and Disguise(x, giffard) -> Gentle(giffard))\nforall x (Gentle(x) and Chat(x, amandie) -> Ultrasonic(x))\nforall x (Disguise(x, amandie) and Chat(x, shirlee) -> Unsigned(shirlee))\nChat(giffard, shirlee) -> Disguise(shirlee, antony)\nforall x (Disguise(x, shirlee) -> Disguise(shirlee, giffard))\nforall x (Team(x, shirlee) and Disguise(x, giffard) -> Unsigned(shirlee))\nforall x (Shrivelled(x) and Team(x, shirlee) -> Disguise(x, antony))\nforall x (Gentle(x) and Disguise(x, giffard) -> Chat(giffard, amandie))\n\nnot Ultrasonic(antony)\n\nforall x (Gentle(x) and Chat(x, amandie) -> Ultrasonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The tandi build the mireielle. The carine cakewalk the tandi. The mireielle miniate the carine. The georgiana miniate the tandi. If something miniate the carine and it build the carine then the carine is unsighted. If something is unsighted and it cakewalk the tandi then it is crafty. If something build the tandi and it cakewalk the mireielle then the mireielle is calcic. If the carine cakewalk the mireielle then the mireielle build the georgiana. If something build the mireielle then the mireielle build the carine. If something miniate the mireielle and it build the carine then the mireielle is calcic. If something is untouched and it miniate the mireielle then it build the georgiana. If something is unsighted and it build the carine then the carine cakewalk the tandi. The mireielle is crafty.", "logic": "\nBuild(tandi, mireielle)\nCakewalk(carine, tandi)\nMiniate(mireielle, carine)\nMiniate(georgiana, tandi)\nforall x (Miniate(x, carine) and Build(x, carine) -> Unsighted(carine))\nforall x (Unsighted(x) and Cakewalk(x, tandi) -> Crafty(x))\nforall x (Build(x, tandi) and Cakewalk(x, mireielle) -> Calcic(mireielle))\nCakewalk(carine, mireielle) -> Build(mireielle, georgiana)\nforall x (Build(x, mireielle) -> Build(mireielle, carine))\nforall x (Miniate(x, mireielle) and Build(x, carine) -> Calcic(mireielle))\nforall x (Untouched(x) and Miniate(x, mireielle) -> Build(x, georgiana))\nforall x (Unsighted(x) and Build(x, carine) -> Cakewalk(carine, tandi))\n\nCrafty(mireielle)\n\nforall x (Unsighted(x) and Cakewalk(x, tandi) -> Crafty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The fleurette foxhunt the rochester. The amandy heliograph the fleurette. The rochester overstep the amandy. The janie overstep the fleurette. If something overstep the amandy and it foxhunt the amandy then the amandy is analogical. If something is analogical and it heliograph the fleurette then it is softheaded. If something foxhunt the fleurette and it heliograph the rochester then the rochester is unary. If the amandy heliograph the rochester then the rochester foxhunt the janie. If something foxhunt the rochester then the rochester foxhunt the amandy. If something overstep the rochester and it foxhunt the amandy then the rochester is unary. If something is isolating and it overstep the rochester then it foxhunt the janie. If something is analogical and it foxhunt the amandy then the amandy heliograph the fleurette. The rochester does not chase the rochester.", "logic": "\nFoxhunt(fleurette, rochester)\nHeliograph(amandy, fleurette)\nOverstep(rochester, amandy)\nOverstep(janie, fleurette)\nforall x (Overstep(x, amandy) and Foxhunt(x, amandy) -> Analogical(amandy))\nforall x (Analogical(x) and Heliograph(x, fleurette) -> Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, fleurette) and Heliograph(x, rochester) -> Unary(rochester))\nHeliograph(amandy, rochester) -> Foxhunt(rochester, janie)\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, rochester) -> Foxhunt(rochester, amandy))\nforall x (Overstep(x, rochester) and Foxhunt(x, amandy) -> Unary(rochester))\nforall x (Isolating(x) and Overstep(x, rochester) -> Foxhunt(x, janie))\nforall x (Analogical(x) and Foxhunt(x, amandy) -> Heliograph(amandy, fleurette))\n\nnot Overstep(rochester, rochester)\n\nnot Overstep(rochester, rochester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The agatha grandstand the hashim. The dehlia rede the agatha. The hashim champion the dehlia. The murdock champion the agatha. If something champion the dehlia and it grandstand the dehlia then the dehlia is rimed. If something is rimed and it rede the agatha then it is foliate. If something grandstand the agatha and it rede the hashim then the hashim is flagging. If the dehlia rede the hashim then the hashim grandstand the murdock. If something grandstand the hashim then the hashim grandstand the dehlia. If something champion the hashim and it grandstand the dehlia then the hashim is flagging. If something is dozen and it champion the hashim then it grandstand the murdock. If something is rimed and it grandstand the dehlia then the dehlia rede the agatha. The murdock rede the agatha.", "logic": "\nGrandstand(agatha, hashim)\nRede(dehlia, agatha)\nChampion(hashim, dehlia)\nChampion(murdock, agatha)\nforall x (Champion(x, dehlia) and Grandstand(x, dehlia) -> Rimed(dehlia))\nforall x (Rimed(x) and Rede(x, agatha) -> Foliate(x))\nforall x (Grandstand(x, agatha) and Rede(x, hashim) -> Flagging(hashim))\nRede(dehlia, hashim) -> Grandstand(hashim, murdock)\nforall x (Grandstand(x, hashim) -> Grandstand(hashim, dehlia))\nforall x (Champion(x, hashim) and Grandstand(x, dehlia) -> Flagging(hashim))\nforall x (Dozen(x) and Champion(x, hashim) -> Grandstand(x, murdock))\nforall x (Rimed(x) and Grandstand(x, dehlia) -> Rede(dehlia, agatha))\n\nRede(murdock, agatha)\n\nRede(murdock, agatha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The reid sour the ernesto. The nunzio sightsing the reid. The ernesto melanize the nunzio. The waiter melanize the reid. If something melanize the nunzio and it sour the nunzio then the nunzio is ergotropic. If something is ergotropic and it sightsing the reid then it is precordial. If something sour the reid and it sightsing the ernesto then the ernesto is allogamous. If the nunzio sightsing the ernesto then the ernesto sour the waiter. If something sour the ernesto then the ernesto sour the nunzio. If something melanize the ernesto and it sour the nunzio then the ernesto is allogamous. If something is hardcore and it melanize the ernesto then it sour the waiter. If something is ergotropic and it sour the nunzio then the nunzio sightsing the reid. The nunzio does not chase the ernesto.", "logic": "\nSour(reid, ernesto)\nSightsing(nunzio, reid)\nMelanize(ernesto, nunzio)\nMelanize(waiter, reid)\nforall x (Melanize(x, nunzio) and Sour(x, nunzio) -> Ergotropic(nunzio))\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) and Sightsing(x, reid) -> Precordial(x))\nforall x (Sour(x, reid) and Sightsing(x, ernesto) -> Allogamous(ernesto))\nSightsing(nunzio, ernesto) -> Sour(ernesto, waiter)\nforall x (Sour(x, ernesto) -> Sour(ernesto, nunzio))\nforall x (Melanize(x, ernesto) and Sour(x, nunzio) -> Allogamous(ernesto))\nforall x (Hardcore(x) and Melanize(x, ernesto) -> Sour(x, waiter))\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) and Sour(x, nunzio) -> Sightsing(nunzio, reid))\n\nnot Melanize(nunzio, ernesto)\n\nnot Melanize(nunzio, ernesto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The antonetta faggot the astrix. The valdemar sparkle the antonetta. The astrix bell the valdemar. The vanna bell the antonetta. If something bell the valdemar and it faggot the valdemar then the valdemar is picayune. If something is picayune and it sparkle the antonetta then it is unnerving. If something faggot the antonetta and it sparkle the astrix then the astrix is dismaying. If the valdemar sparkle the astrix then the astrix faggot the vanna. If something faggot the astrix then the astrix faggot the valdemar. If something bell the astrix and it faggot the valdemar then the astrix is dismaying. If something is dietary and it bell the astrix then it faggot the vanna. If something is picayune and it faggot the valdemar then the valdemar sparkle the antonetta. The astrix sparkle the valdemar.", "logic": "\nFaggot(antonetta, astrix)\nSparkle(valdemar, antonetta)\nBell(astrix, valdemar)\nBell(vanna, antonetta)\nforall x (Bell(x, valdemar) and Faggot(x, valdemar) -> Picayune(valdemar))\nforall x (Picayune(x) and Sparkle(x, antonetta) -> Unnerving(x))\nforall x (Faggot(x, antonetta) and Sparkle(x, astrix) -> Dismaying(astrix))\nSparkle(valdemar, astrix) -> Faggot(astrix, vanna)\nforall x (Faggot(x, astrix) -> Faggot(astrix, valdemar))\nforall x (Bell(x, astrix) and Faggot(x, valdemar) -> Dismaying(astrix))\nforall x (Dietary(x) and Bell(x, astrix) -> Faggot(x, vanna))\nforall x (Picayune(x) and Faggot(x, valdemar) -> Sparkle(valdemar, antonetta))\n\nSparkle(astrix, valdemar)\n\nSparkle(astrix, valdemar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1406"} {"premises": "The meira is brackish. The meira is glinting. The meira is autogenic. The meira is timeless. The meira is inexact. The meira prod the rhona. The meira oxidate the rhona. The meira translate the rhona. The rhona is brackish. The rhona is glinting. The rhona is autogenic. The rhona is inexact. The rhona prod the meira. The rhona oxidate the meira. The rhona translate the meira. If someone translate the meira then they are brackish. If someone oxidate the meira then they are brackish. If someone oxidate the meira and they see the rhona then the rhona is timeless. If someone oxidate the rhona and the rhona is timeless then they see the meira. If the meira prod the rhona then the meira is brackish. If someone prod the meira then they see the rhona. If the rhona is glinting and the rhona prod the meira then the rhona oxidate the meira. If someone prod the rhona then the rhona oxidate the meira. The meira prod the rhona.", "logic": "\nBrackish(meira)\nGlinting(meira)\nAutogenic(meira)\nTimeless(meira)\nInexact(meira)\nProd(meira, rhona)\nOxidate(meira, rhona)\nTranslate(meira, rhona)\nBrackish(rhona)\nGlinting(rhona)\nAutogenic(rhona)\nInexact(rhona)\nProd(rhona, meira)\nOxidate(rhona, meira)\nTranslate(rhona, meira)\nforall x (Translate(x, meira) -> Brackish(x))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, meira) -> Brackish(x))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, meira) and Oxidate(x, rhona) -> Timeless(rhona))\nforall x (Oxidate(x, rhona) and Timeless(rhona) -> Oxidate(x, meira))\nProd(meira, rhona) -> Brackish(meira)\nforall x (Prod(x, meira) -> Oxidate(x, rhona))\nGlinting(rhona) and Prod(rhona, meira) -> Oxidate(rhona, meira)\nforall x (Prod(x, rhona) -> Oxidate(rhona, meira))\n\nProd(meira, rhona)\n\ntherefore Prod(meira, rhona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The eddy is nonprofit. The eddy is mannerly. The eddy is dipterous. The eddy is infallible. The eddy is scurvy. The eddy glower the nicole. The eddy infringe the nicole. The eddy convey the nicole. The nicole is nonprofit. The nicole is mannerly. The nicole is dipterous. The nicole is scurvy. The nicole glower the eddy. The nicole infringe the eddy. The nicole convey the eddy. If someone convey the eddy then they are nonprofit. If someone infringe the eddy then they are nonprofit. If someone infringe the eddy and they see the nicole then the nicole is infallible. If someone infringe the nicole and the nicole is infallible then they see the eddy. If the eddy glower the nicole then the eddy is nonprofit. If someone glower the eddy then they see the nicole. If the nicole is mannerly and the nicole glower the eddy then the nicole infringe the eddy. If someone glower the nicole then the nicole infringe the eddy. The eddy does not visit the nicole.", "logic": "\nNonprofit(eddy)\nMannerly(eddy)\nDipterous(eddy)\nInfallible(eddy)\nScurvy(eddy)\nGlower(eddy, nicole)\nInfringe(eddy, nicole)\nConvey(eddy, nicole)\nNonprofit(nicole)\nMannerly(nicole)\nDipterous(nicole)\nScurvy(nicole)\nGlower(nicole, eddy)\nInfringe(nicole, eddy)\nConvey(nicole, eddy)\nforall x (Convey(x, eddy) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Infringe(x, eddy) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Infringe(x, eddy) and Infringe(x, nicole) -> Infallible(nicole))\nforall x (Infringe(x, nicole) and Infallible(nicole) -> Infringe(x, eddy))\nGlower(eddy, nicole) -> Nonprofit(eddy)\nforall x (Glower(x, eddy) -> Infringe(x, nicole))\nMannerly(nicole) and Glower(nicole, eddy) -> Infringe(nicole, eddy)\nforall x (Glower(x, nicole) -> Infringe(nicole, eddy))\n\nnot Convey(eddy, nicole)\n\ntherefore Convey(eddy, nicole)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The nero is overfond. The nero is diluvial. The nero is fraught. The nero is deadpan. The nero is tyrannical. The nero dispirit the larina. The nero adhere the larina. The nero ruddle the larina. The larina is overfond. The larina is diluvial. The larina is fraught. The larina is tyrannical. The larina dispirit the nero. The larina adhere the nero. The larina ruddle the nero. If someone ruddle the nero then they are overfond. If someone adhere the nero then they are overfond. If someone adhere the nero and they see the larina then the larina is deadpan. If someone adhere the larina and the larina is deadpan then they see the nero. If the nero dispirit the larina then the nero is overfond. If someone dispirit the nero then they see the larina. If the larina is diluvial and the larina dispirit the nero then the larina adhere the nero. If someone dispirit the larina then the larina adhere the nero. The larina adhere the larina.", "logic": "\nOverfond(nero)\nDiluvial(nero)\nFraught(nero)\nDeadpan(nero)\nTyrannical(nero)\nDispirit(nero, larina)\nAdhere(nero, larina)\nRuddle(nero, larina)\nOverfond(larina)\nDiluvial(larina)\nFraught(larina)\nTyrannical(larina)\nDispirit(larina, nero)\nAdhere(larina, nero)\nRuddle(larina, nero)\nforall x (Ruddle(x, nero) -> Overfond(x))\nforall x (Adhere(x, nero) -> Overfond(x))\nforall x (Adhere(x, nero) and Adhere(x, larina) -> Deadpan(larina))\nforall x (Adhere(x, larina) and Deadpan(larina) -> Adhere(x, nero))\nDispirit(nero, larina) -> Overfond(nero)\nforall x (Dispirit(x, nero) -> Adhere(x, larina))\nDiluvial(larina) and Dispirit(larina, nero) -> Adhere(larina, nero)\nforall x (Dispirit(x, larina) -> Adhere(larina, nero))\n\nAdhere(larina, larina)\n\nDispirit(larina, nero) and forall x (Dispirit(x, nero) -> Adhere(x, larina)) -> therefore Adhere(larina, larina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The piet is diffuse. The piet is orderly. The piet is patchy. The piet is bastard. The piet is concealing. The piet strip the mendel. The piet foal the mendel. The piet shin the mendel. The mendel is diffuse. The mendel is orderly. The mendel is patchy. The mendel is concealing. The mendel strip the piet. The mendel foal the piet. The mendel shin the piet. If someone shin the piet then they are diffuse. If someone foal the piet then they are diffuse. If someone foal the piet and they see the mendel then the mendel is bastard. If someone foal the mendel and the mendel is bastard then they see the piet. If the piet strip the mendel then the piet is diffuse. If someone strip the piet then they see the mendel. If the mendel is orderly and the mendel strip the piet then the mendel foal the piet. If someone strip the mendel then the mendel foal the piet. The mendel does not see the mendel.", "logic": "\nDiffuse(piet)\nOrderly(piet)\nPatchy(piet)\nBastard(piet)\nConcealing(piet)\nStrip(piet, mendel)\nFoal(piet, mendel)\nShin(piet, mendel)\nDiffuse(mendel)\nOrderly(mendel)\nPatchy(mendel)\nConcealing(mendel)\nStrip(mendel, piet)\nFoal(mendel, piet)\nShin(mendel, piet)\nforall x (Shin(x, piet) -> Diffuse(x))\nforall x (Foal(x, piet) -> Diffuse(x))\nforall x (Foal(x, piet) and Foal(x, mendel) -> Bastard(mendel))\nforall x (Foal(x, mendel) and Bastard(mendel) -> Foal(x, piet))\nStrip(piet, mendel) -> Diffuse(piet)\nforall x (Strip(x, piet) -> Foal(x, mendel))\nOrderly(mendel) and Strip(mendel, piet) -> Foal(mendel, piet)\nforall x (Strip(x, mendel) -> Foal(mendel, piet))\n\nnot Foal(mendel, mendel)\n\nStrip(mendel, piet) and forall x (Strip(x, piet) -> Foal(x, mendel)) -> therefore Foal(mendel, mendel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The benedikta is teenaged. The benedikta is peeved. The benedikta is thyrotoxic. The benedikta is sitting. The benedikta is unsought. The benedikta dismay the cari. The benedikta japan the cari. The benedikta bustle the cari. The cari is teenaged. The cari is peeved. The cari is thyrotoxic. The cari is unsought. The cari dismay the benedikta. The cari japan the benedikta. The cari bustle the benedikta. If someone bustle the benedikta then they are teenaged. If someone japan the benedikta then they are teenaged. If someone japan the benedikta and they see the cari then the cari is sitting. If someone japan the cari and the cari is sitting then they see the benedikta. If the benedikta dismay the cari then the benedikta is teenaged. If someone dismay the benedikta then they see the cari. If the cari is peeved and the cari dismay the benedikta then the cari japan the benedikta. If someone dismay the cari then the cari japan the benedikta. The cari is sitting.", "logic": "\nTeenaged(benedikta)\nPeeved(benedikta)\nThyrotoxic(benedikta)\nSitting(benedikta)\nUnsought(benedikta)\nDismay(benedikta, cari)\nJapan(benedikta, cari)\nBustle(benedikta, cari)\nTeenaged(cari)\nPeeved(cari)\nThyrotoxic(cari)\nUnsought(cari)\nDismay(cari, benedikta)\nJapan(cari, benedikta)\nBustle(cari, benedikta)\nforall x (Bustle(x, benedikta) -> Teenaged(x))\nforall x (Japan(x, benedikta) -> Teenaged(x))\nforall x (Japan(x, benedikta) and Japan(x, cari) -> Sitting(cari))\nforall x (Japan(x, cari) and Sitting(cari) -> Japan(x, benedikta))\nDismay(benedikta, cari) -> Teenaged(benedikta)\nforall x (Dismay(x, benedikta) -> Japan(x, cari))\nPeeved(cari) and Dismay(cari, benedikta) -> Japan(cari, benedikta)\nforall x (Dismay(x, cari) -> Japan(cari, benedikta))\n\nSitting(cari)\n\nDismay(cari, benedikta) and forall x (Dismay(x, benedikta) -> Japan(x, cari)) -> therefore Japan(cari, cari) Japan(cari, benedikta) and Japan(cari, cari) and forall x (Japan(x, benedikta) and Japan(x, cari) -> Sitting(cari)) -> therefore Sitting(cari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The antonie is unkept. The antonie is addled. The antonie is untufted. The antonie is trousered. The antonie is burry. The antonie brand the waleed. The antonie beacon the waleed. The antonie find the waleed. The waleed is unkept. The waleed is addled. The waleed is untufted. The waleed is burry. The waleed brand the antonie. The waleed beacon the antonie. The waleed find the antonie. If someone find the antonie then they are unkept. If someone beacon the antonie then they are unkept. If someone beacon the antonie and they see the waleed then the waleed is trousered. If someone beacon the waleed and the waleed is trousered then they see the antonie. If the antonie brand the waleed then the antonie is unkept. If someone brand the antonie then they see the waleed. If the waleed is addled and the waleed brand the antonie then the waleed beacon the antonie. If someone brand the waleed then the waleed beacon the antonie. The waleed is not trousered.", "logic": "\nUnkept(antonie)\nAddled(antonie)\nUntufted(antonie)\nTrousered(antonie)\nBurry(antonie)\nBrand(antonie, waleed)\nBeacon(antonie, waleed)\nFind(antonie, waleed)\nUnkept(waleed)\nAddled(waleed)\nUntufted(waleed)\nBurry(waleed)\nBrand(waleed, antonie)\nBeacon(waleed, antonie)\nFind(waleed, antonie)\nforall x (Find(x, antonie) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Beacon(x, antonie) -> Unkept(x))\nforall x (Beacon(x, antonie) and Beacon(x, waleed) -> Trousered(waleed))\nforall x (Beacon(x, waleed) and Trousered(waleed) -> Beacon(x, antonie))\nBrand(antonie, waleed) -> Unkept(antonie)\nforall x (Brand(x, antonie) -> Beacon(x, waleed))\nAddled(waleed) and Brand(waleed, antonie) -> Beacon(waleed, antonie)\nforall x (Brand(x, waleed) -> Beacon(waleed, antonie))\n\nnot Trousered(waleed)\n\nBrand(waleed, antonie) and forall x (Brand(x, antonie) -> Beacon(x, waleed)) -> therefore Beacon(waleed, waleed) Beacon(waleed, antonie) and Beacon(waleed, waleed) and forall x (Beacon(x, antonie) and Beacon(x, waleed) -> Trousered(waleed)) -> therefore Trousered(waleed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The danny is transonic. The danny is unmannerly. The danny is bindable. The danny is beforehand. The danny is myelinated. The danny edit the alvera. The danny misjudge the alvera. The danny disoblige the alvera. The alvera is transonic. The alvera is unmannerly. The alvera is bindable. The alvera is myelinated. The alvera edit the danny. The alvera misjudge the danny. The alvera disoblige the danny. If someone disoblige the danny then they are transonic. If someone misjudge the danny then they are transonic. If someone misjudge the danny and they see the alvera then the alvera is beforehand. If someone misjudge the alvera and the alvera is beforehand then they see the danny. If the danny edit the alvera then the danny is transonic. If someone edit the danny then they see the alvera. If the alvera is unmannerly and the alvera edit the danny then the alvera misjudge the danny. If someone edit the alvera then the alvera misjudge the danny. The danny misjudge the danny.", "logic": "\nTransonic(danny)\nUnmannerly(danny)\nBindable(danny)\nBeforehand(danny)\nMyelinated(danny)\nEdit(danny, alvera)\nMisjudge(danny, alvera)\nDisoblige(danny, alvera)\nTransonic(alvera)\nUnmannerly(alvera)\nBindable(alvera)\nMyelinated(alvera)\nEdit(alvera, danny)\nMisjudge(alvera, danny)\nDisoblige(alvera, danny)\nforall x (Disoblige(x, danny) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Misjudge(x, danny) -> Transonic(x))\nforall x (Misjudge(x, danny) and Misjudge(x, alvera) -> Beforehand(alvera))\nforall x (Misjudge(x, alvera) and Beforehand(alvera) -> Misjudge(x, danny))\nEdit(danny, alvera) -> Transonic(danny)\nforall x (Edit(x, danny) -> Misjudge(x, alvera))\nUnmannerly(alvera) and Edit(alvera, danny) -> Misjudge(alvera, danny)\nforall x (Edit(x, alvera) -> Misjudge(alvera, danny))\n\nMisjudge(danny, danny)\n\nEdit(alvera, danny) and forall x (Edit(x, danny) -> Misjudge(x, alvera)) -> therefore Misjudge(alvera, alvera) Misjudge(alvera, danny) and Misjudge(alvera, alvera) and forall x (Misjudge(x, danny) and Misjudge(x, alvera) -> Beforehand(alvera)) -> therefore Beforehand(alvera) Misjudge(danny, alvera) and Beforehand(alvera) and forall x (Misjudge(x, alvera) and Beforehand(alvera) -> Misjudge(x, danny)) -> therefore Misjudge(danny, danny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The kinna is resident. The kinna is needed. The kinna is intrepid. The kinna is taunting. The kinna is patched. The kinna birle the peggi. The kinna dodder the peggi. The kinna wrench the peggi. The peggi is resident. The peggi is needed. The peggi is intrepid. The peggi is patched. The peggi birle the kinna. The peggi dodder the kinna. The peggi wrench the kinna. If someone wrench the kinna then they are resident. If someone dodder the kinna then they are resident. If someone dodder the kinna and they see the peggi then the peggi is taunting. If someone dodder the peggi and the peggi is taunting then they see the kinna. If the kinna birle the peggi then the kinna is resident. If someone birle the kinna then they see the peggi. If the peggi is needed and the peggi birle the kinna then the peggi dodder the kinna. If someone birle the peggi then the peggi dodder the kinna. The kinna does not see the kinna.", "logic": "\nResident(kinna)\nNeeded(kinna)\nIntrepid(kinna)\nTaunting(kinna)\nPatched(kinna)\nBirle(kinna, peggi)\nDodder(kinna, peggi)\nWrench(kinna, peggi)\nResident(peggi)\nNeeded(peggi)\nIntrepid(peggi)\nPatched(peggi)\nBirle(peggi, kinna)\nDodder(peggi, kinna)\nWrench(peggi, kinna)\nforall x (Wrench(x, kinna) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Dodder(x, kinna) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Dodder(x, kinna) and Dodder(x, peggi) -> Taunting(peggi))\nforall x (Dodder(x, peggi) and Taunting(peggi) -> Dodder(x, kinna))\nBirle(kinna, peggi) -> Resident(kinna)\nforall x (Birle(x, kinna) -> Dodder(x, peggi))\nNeeded(peggi) and Birle(peggi, kinna) -> Dodder(peggi, kinna)\nforall x (Birle(x, peggi) -> Dodder(peggi, kinna))\n\nnot Dodder(kinna, kinna)\n\nBirle(peggi, kinna) and forall x (Birle(x, kinna) -> Dodder(x, peggi)) -> therefore Dodder(peggi, peggi) Dodder(peggi, kinna) and Dodder(peggi, peggi) and forall x (Dodder(x, kinna) and Dodder(x, peggi) -> Taunting(peggi)) -> therefore Taunting(peggi) Dodder(kinna, peggi) and Taunting(peggi) and forall x (Dodder(x, peggi) and Taunting(peggi) -> Dodder(x, kinna)) -> therefore Dodder(kinna, kinna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The olivia is legible. The olivia is roaring. The olivia is berried. The olivia is sublime. The olivia is epithelial. The olivia guillotine the oswell. The olivia disbelieve the oswell. The olivia undershoot the oswell. The oswell is legible. The oswell is roaring. The oswell is berried. The oswell is epithelial. The oswell guillotine the olivia. The oswell disbelieve the olivia. The oswell undershoot the olivia. If someone undershoot the olivia then they are legible. If someone disbelieve the olivia then they are legible. If someone disbelieve the olivia and they see the oswell then the oswell is sublime. If someone disbelieve the oswell and the oswell is sublime then they see the olivia. If the olivia guillotine the oswell then the olivia is legible. If someone guillotine the olivia then they see the oswell. If the oswell is roaring and the oswell guillotine the olivia then the oswell disbelieve the olivia. If someone guillotine the oswell then the oswell disbelieve the olivia. The olivia does not visit the olivia.", "logic": "\nLegible(olivia)\nRoaring(olivia)\nBerried(olivia)\nSublime(olivia)\nEpithelial(olivia)\nGuillotine(olivia, oswell)\nDisbelieve(olivia, oswell)\nUndershoot(olivia, oswell)\nLegible(oswell)\nRoaring(oswell)\nBerried(oswell)\nEpithelial(oswell)\nGuillotine(oswell, olivia)\nDisbelieve(oswell, olivia)\nUndershoot(oswell, olivia)\nforall x (Undershoot(x, olivia) -> Legible(x))\nforall x (Disbelieve(x, olivia) -> Legible(x))\nforall x (Disbelieve(x, olivia) and Disbelieve(x, oswell) -> Sublime(oswell))\nforall x (Disbelieve(x, oswell) and Sublime(oswell) -> Disbelieve(x, olivia))\nGuillotine(olivia, oswell) -> Legible(olivia)\nforall x (Guillotine(x, olivia) -> Disbelieve(x, oswell))\nRoaring(oswell) and Guillotine(oswell, olivia) -> Disbelieve(oswell, olivia)\nforall x (Guillotine(x, oswell) -> Disbelieve(oswell, olivia))\n\nnot Undershoot(olivia, olivia)\n\nnot Undershoot(olivia, olivia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The tillie is piercing. The tillie is referent. The tillie is over. The tillie is refractive. The tillie is scrivened. The tillie commove the alta. The tillie retrovert the alta. The tillie part the alta. The alta is piercing. The alta is referent. The alta is over. The alta is scrivened. The alta commove the tillie. The alta retrovert the tillie. The alta part the tillie. If someone part the tillie then they are piercing. If someone retrovert the tillie then they are piercing. If someone retrovert the tillie and they see the alta then the alta is refractive. If someone retrovert the alta and the alta is refractive then they see the tillie. If the tillie commove the alta then the tillie is piercing. If someone commove the tillie then they see the alta. If the alta is referent and the alta commove the tillie then the alta retrovert the tillie. If someone commove the alta then the alta retrovert the tillie. The alta commove the alta.", "logic": "\nPiercing(tillie)\nReferent(tillie)\nOver(tillie)\nRefractive(tillie)\nScrivened(tillie)\nCommove(tillie, alta)\nRetrovert(tillie, alta)\nPart(tillie, alta)\nPiercing(alta)\nReferent(alta)\nOver(alta)\nScrivened(alta)\nCommove(alta, tillie)\nRetrovert(alta, tillie)\nPart(alta, tillie)\nforall x (Part(x, tillie) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, tillie) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, tillie) and Retrovert(x, alta) -> Refractive(alta))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, alta) and Refractive(alta) -> Retrovert(x, tillie))\nCommove(tillie, alta) -> Piercing(tillie)\nforall x (Commove(x, tillie) -> Retrovert(x, alta))\nReferent(alta) and Commove(alta, tillie) -> Retrovert(alta, tillie)\nforall x (Commove(x, alta) -> Retrovert(alta, tillie))\n\nCommove(alta, alta)\n\nCommove(alta, alta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The krysta is abomasal. The krysta is giving. The krysta is insurable. The krysta is flecked. The krysta is filmed. The krysta visa the alister. The krysta shanghai the alister. The krysta pressurise the alister. The alister is abomasal. The alister is giving. The alister is insurable. The alister is filmed. The alister visa the krysta. The alister shanghai the krysta. The alister pressurise the krysta. If someone pressurise the krysta then they are abomasal. If someone shanghai the krysta then they are abomasal. If someone shanghai the krysta and they see the alister then the alister is flecked. If someone shanghai the alister and the alister is flecked then they see the krysta. If the krysta visa the alister then the krysta is abomasal. If someone visa the krysta then they see the alister. If the alister is giving and the alister visa the krysta then the alister shanghai the krysta. If someone visa the alister then the alister shanghai the krysta. The krysta does not need the krysta.", "logic": "\nAbomasal(krysta)\nGiving(krysta)\nInsurable(krysta)\nFlecked(krysta)\nFilmed(krysta)\nVisa(krysta, alister)\nShanghai(krysta, alister)\nPressurise(krysta, alister)\nAbomasal(alister)\nGiving(alister)\nInsurable(alister)\nFilmed(alister)\nVisa(alister, krysta)\nShanghai(alister, krysta)\nPressurise(alister, krysta)\nforall x (Pressurise(x, krysta) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, krysta) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, krysta) and Shanghai(x, alister) -> Flecked(alister))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, alister) and Flecked(alister) -> Shanghai(x, krysta))\nVisa(krysta, alister) -> Abomasal(krysta)\nforall x (Visa(x, krysta) -> Shanghai(x, alister))\nGiving(alister) and Visa(alister, krysta) -> Shanghai(alister, krysta)\nforall x (Visa(x, alister) -> Shanghai(alister, krysta))\n\nnot Visa(krysta, krysta)\n\nnot Visa(krysta, krysta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "The roy is solemn. The roy is blonde. The roy is hyperbolic. The roy is scorbutic. The roy is cesarian. The roy capsulize the mickie. The roy bronze the mickie. The roy tinge the mickie. The mickie is solemn. The mickie is blonde. The mickie is hyperbolic. The mickie is cesarian. The mickie capsulize the roy. The mickie bronze the roy. The mickie tinge the roy. If someone tinge the roy then they are solemn. If someone bronze the roy then they are solemn. If someone bronze the roy and they see the mickie then the mickie is scorbutic. If someone bronze the mickie and the mickie is scorbutic then they see the roy. If the roy capsulize the mickie then the roy is solemn. If someone capsulize the roy then they see the mickie. If the mickie is blonde and the mickie capsulize the roy then the mickie bronze the roy. If someone capsulize the mickie then the mickie bronze the roy. The mickie tinge the mickie.", "logic": "\nSolemn(roy)\nBlonde(roy)\nHyperbolic(roy)\nScorbutic(roy)\nCesarian(roy)\nCapsulize(roy, mickie)\nBronze(roy, mickie)\nTinge(roy, mickie)\nSolemn(mickie)\nBlonde(mickie)\nHyperbolic(mickie)\nCesarian(mickie)\nCapsulize(mickie, roy)\nBronze(mickie, roy)\nTinge(mickie, roy)\nforall x (Tinge(x, roy) -> Solemn(x))\nforall x (Bronze(x, roy) -> Solemn(x))\nforall x (Bronze(x, roy) and Bronze(x, mickie) -> Scorbutic(mickie))\nforall x (Bronze(x, mickie) and Scorbutic(mickie) -> Bronze(x, roy))\nCapsulize(roy, mickie) -> Solemn(roy)\nforall x (Capsulize(x, roy) -> Bronze(x, mickie))\nBlonde(mickie) and Capsulize(mickie, roy) -> Bronze(mickie, roy)\nforall x (Capsulize(x, mickie) -> Bronze(mickie, roy))\n\nTinge(mickie, mickie)\n\nTinge(mickie, mickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1490"} {"premises": "Klarika is foliose. Odelia is simian. Willyt is foliose. All hardcover, simian things are foliose. All simian, hardcover things are undersea. If something is formless and undersea then it is simian. All undersea things are blasting. Nice, unremedied things are undersea. All foliose, blasting things are simian. If something is hardcover then it is simian. All unremedied, simian things are blasting. Willyt is foliose.", "logic": "\nFoliose(klarika)\nSimian(odelia)\nFoliose(willyt)\nforall x (Hardcover(x) and Simian(x) -> Foliose(x))\nforall x (Simian(x) and Hardcover(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Formless(x) and Undersea(x) -> Simian(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) -> Blasting(x))\nforall x (Foliose(x) and Unremedied(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Foliose(x) and Blasting(x) -> Simian(x))\nforall x (Hardcover(x) -> Simian(x))\nforall x (Unremedied(x) and Simian(x) -> Blasting(x))\n\nFoliose(willyt)\n\ntherefore Foliose(willyt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1215"} {"premises": "Chickie is besieged. Elfrieda is humble. Durant is besieged. All changeful, humble things are besieged. All humble, changeful things are unlimited. If something is waxlike and unlimited then it is humble. All unlimited things are sallow. Nice, extralegal things are unlimited. All besieged, sallow things are humble. If something is changeful then it is humble. All extralegal, humble things are sallow. Elfrieda is not humble.", "logic": "\nBesieged(chickie)\nHumble(elfrieda)\nBesieged(durant)\nforall x (Changeful(x) and Humble(x) -> Besieged(x))\nforall x (Humble(x) and Changeful(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Waxlike(x) and Unlimited(x) -> Humble(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) -> Sallow(x))\nforall x (Besieged(x) and Extralegal(x) -> Unlimited(x))\nforall x (Besieged(x) and Sallow(x) -> Humble(x))\nforall x (Changeful(x) -> Humble(x))\nforall x (Extralegal(x) and Humble(x) -> Sallow(x))\n\nnot Humble(elfrieda)\n\ntherefore Humble(elfrieda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1215"} {"premises": "Candide is supporting. Tomiko is naval. Micheline is supporting. All mozartian, naval things are supporting. All naval, mozartian things are bruneian. If something is cringing and bruneian then it is naval. All bruneian things are redundant. Nice, parrotlike things are bruneian. All supporting, redundant things are naval. If something is mozartian then it is naval. All parrotlike, naval things are redundant. Micheline is not naval.", "logic": "\nSupporting(candide)\nNaval(tomiko)\nSupporting(micheline)\nforall x (Mozartian(x) and Naval(x) -> Supporting(x))\nforall x (Naval(x) and Mozartian(x) -> Bruneian(x))\nforall x (Cringing(x) and Bruneian(x) -> Naval(x))\nforall x (Bruneian(x) -> Redundant(x))\nforall x (Supporting(x) and Parrotlike(x) -> Bruneian(x))\nforall x (Supporting(x) and Redundant(x) -> Naval(x))\nforall x (Mozartian(x) -> Naval(x))\nforall x (Parrotlike(x) and Naval(x) -> Redundant(x))\n\nnot Naval(micheline)\n\nforall x (Supporting(x) and Redundant(x) -> Naval(x)) <- forall x (Bruneian(x) -> Redundant(x)) <- forall x (Naval(x) and Mozartian(x) -> Bruneian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1215"} {"premises": "Egbert is frictional. Jacenta is unhumorous. Jon is frictional. All judgmental, unhumorous things are frictional. All unhumorous, judgmental things are vivacious. If something is bootleg and vivacious then it is unhumorous. All vivacious things are multicolor. Nice, bowery things are vivacious. All frictional, multicolor things are unhumorous. If something is judgmental then it is unhumorous. All bowery, unhumorous things are multicolor. Jon is bowery.", "logic": "\nFrictional(egbert)\nUnhumorous(jacenta)\nFrictional(jon)\nforall x (Judgmental(x) and Unhumorous(x) -> Frictional(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) and Judgmental(x) -> Vivacious(x))\nforall x (Bootleg(x) and Vivacious(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\nforall x (Vivacious(x) -> Multicolor(x))\nforall x (Frictional(x) and Bowery(x) -> Vivacious(x))\nforall x (Frictional(x) and Multicolor(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Unhumorous(x))\nforall x (Bowery(x) and Unhumorous(x) -> Multicolor(x))\n\nBowery(jon)\n\nBowery(jon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1215"} {"premises": "The carson does not like the hendrick. The hendrick empathise the arlana. The arlana is wainscoted. If someone is vowellike then they like the carson. If someone is wainscoted then they like the carson. If someone is wainscoted and not ploughed then they are walloping. If someone encrypt the carson then the carson empathise the arlana. If the arlana is wainscoted then the arlana encrypt the carson. If the carson empathise the arlana then the arlana encrypt the hendrick. The carson does not like the hendrick.", "logic": "\nnot Encrypt(carson, hendrick)\nEmpathise(hendrick, arlana)\nWainscoted(arlana)\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Encrypt(x, carson))\nforall x (Wainscoted(x) -> Encrypt(x, carson))\nforall x (Wainscoted(x) and not Ploughed(x) -> Walloping(x))\nforall x (Encrypt(x, carson) -> Empathise(carson, arlana))\nWainscoted(arlana) -> Encrypt(arlana, carson)\nEmpathise(carson, arlana) -> Encrypt(arlana, hendrick)\n\nnot Encrypt(carson, hendrick)\n\ntherefore not Encrypt(carson, hendrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The granville does not like the janeva. The janeva overdraw the phillip. The phillip is divergent. If someone is amitotic then they like the granville. If someone is divergent then they like the granville. If someone is divergent and not tender then they are deadpan. If someone reboot the granville then the granville overdraw the phillip. If the phillip is divergent then the phillip reboot the granville. If the granville overdraw the phillip then the phillip reboot the janeva. The granville reboot the janeva.", "logic": "\nnot Reboot(granville, janeva)\nOverdraw(janeva, phillip)\nDivergent(phillip)\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Reboot(x, granville))\nforall x (Divergent(x) -> Reboot(x, granville))\nforall x (Divergent(x) and not Tender(x) -> Deadpan(x))\nforall x (Reboot(x, granville) -> Overdraw(granville, phillip))\nDivergent(phillip) -> Reboot(phillip, granville)\nOverdraw(granville, phillip) -> Reboot(phillip, janeva)\n\nReboot(granville, janeva)\n\ntherefore not Reboot(granville, janeva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The barris does not like the ezra. The ezra buffet the cloris. The cloris is weblike. If someone is funereal then they like the barris. If someone is weblike then they like the barris. If someone is weblike and not puissant then they are sagacious. If someone huff the barris then the barris buffet the cloris. If the cloris is weblike then the cloris huff the barris. If the barris buffet the cloris then the cloris huff the ezra. The cloris huff the barris.", "logic": "\nnot Huff(barris, ezra)\nBuffet(ezra, cloris)\nWeblike(cloris)\nforall x (Funereal(x) -> Huff(x, barris))\nforall x (Weblike(x) -> Huff(x, barris))\nforall x (Weblike(x) and not Puissant(x) -> Sagacious(x))\nforall x (Huff(x, barris) -> Buffet(barris, cloris))\nWeblike(cloris) -> Huff(cloris, barris)\nBuffet(barris, cloris) -> Huff(cloris, ezra)\n\nHuff(cloris, barris)\n\nWeblike(cloris) and forall x (Weblike(x) -> Huff(x, barris)) -> therefore Huff(cloris, barris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The daile does not like the ruthie. The ruthie obstruct the eliott. The eliott is packaged. If someone is sneering then they like the daile. If someone is packaged then they like the daile. If someone is packaged and not hoggish then they are andantino. If someone swatter the daile then the daile obstruct the eliott. If the eliott is packaged then the eliott swatter the daile. If the daile obstruct the eliott then the eliott swatter the ruthie. The eliott does not like the daile.", "logic": "\nnot Swatter(daile, ruthie)\nObstruct(ruthie, eliott)\nPackaged(eliott)\nforall x (Sneering(x) -> Swatter(x, daile))\nforall x (Packaged(x) -> Swatter(x, daile))\nforall x (Packaged(x) and not Hoggish(x) -> Andantino(x))\nforall x (Swatter(x, daile) -> Obstruct(daile, eliott))\nPackaged(eliott) -> Swatter(eliott, daile)\nObstruct(daile, eliott) -> Swatter(eliott, ruthie)\n\nnot Swatter(eliott, daile)\n\nPackaged(eliott) and forall x (Packaged(x) -> Swatter(x, daile)) -> therefore Swatter(eliott, daile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The abelard does not like the hyacinthe. The hyacinthe entice the timothea. The timothea is slovakian. If someone is vaporish then they like the abelard. If someone is slovakian then they like the abelard. If someone is slovakian and not myotonic then they are ultimate. If someone telescope the abelard then the abelard entice the timothea. If the timothea is slovakian then the timothea telescope the abelard. If the abelard entice the timothea then the timothea telescope the hyacinthe. The abelard entice the timothea.", "logic": "\nnot Telescope(abelard, hyacinthe)\nEntice(hyacinthe, timothea)\nSlovakian(timothea)\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Telescope(x, abelard))\nforall x (Slovakian(x) -> Telescope(x, abelard))\nforall x (Slovakian(x) and not Myotonic(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Telescope(x, abelard) -> Entice(abelard, timothea))\nSlovakian(timothea) -> Telescope(timothea, abelard)\nEntice(abelard, timothea) -> Telescope(timothea, hyacinthe)\n\nEntice(abelard, timothea)\n\nSlovakian(timothea) and forall x (Slovakian(x) -> Telescope(x, abelard)) -> therefore Telescope(timothea, abelard) Telescope(timothea, abelard) and forall x (Telescope(x, abelard) -> Entice(abelard, timothea)) -> therefore Entice(abelard, timothea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The joya does not like the teddy. The teddy acidulate the veronika. The veronika is jittery. If someone is pilous then they like the joya. If someone is jittery then they like the joya. If someone is jittery and not ammonitic then they are ringed. If someone mime the joya then the joya acidulate the veronika. If the veronika is jittery then the veronika mime the joya. If the joya acidulate the veronika then the veronika mime the teddy. The joya does not chase the veronika.", "logic": "\nnot Mime(joya, teddy)\nAcidulate(teddy, veronika)\nJittery(veronika)\nforall x (Pilous(x) -> Mime(x, joya))\nforall x (Jittery(x) -> Mime(x, joya))\nforall x (Jittery(x) and not Ammonitic(x) -> Ringed(x))\nforall x (Mime(x, joya) -> Acidulate(joya, veronika))\nJittery(veronika) -> Mime(veronika, joya)\nAcidulate(joya, veronika) -> Mime(veronika, teddy)\n\nnot Acidulate(joya, veronika)\n\nJittery(veronika) and forall x (Jittery(x) -> Mime(x, joya)) -> therefore Mime(veronika, joya) Mime(veronika, joya) and forall x (Mime(x, joya) -> Acidulate(joya, veronika)) -> therefore Acidulate(joya, veronika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The oralie does not like the willey. The willey kick the domenic. The domenic is bottom. If someone is lateral then they like the oralie. If someone is bottom then they like the oralie. If someone is bottom and not shameless then they are aeschylean. If someone cascade the oralie then the oralie kick the domenic. If the domenic is bottom then the domenic cascade the oralie. If the oralie kick the domenic then the domenic cascade the willey. The domenic cascade the willey.", "logic": "\nnot Cascade(oralie, willey)\nKick(willey, domenic)\nBottom(domenic)\nforall x (Lateral(x) -> Cascade(x, oralie))\nforall x (Bottom(x) -> Cascade(x, oralie))\nforall x (Bottom(x) and not Shameless(x) -> Aeschylean(x))\nforall x (Cascade(x, oralie) -> Kick(oralie, domenic))\nBottom(domenic) -> Cascade(domenic, oralie)\nKick(oralie, domenic) -> Cascade(domenic, willey)\n\nCascade(domenic, willey)\n\nBottom(domenic) and forall x (Bottom(x) -> Cascade(x, oralie)) -> therefore Cascade(domenic, oralie) Cascade(domenic, oralie) and forall x (Cascade(x, oralie) -> Kick(oralie, domenic)) -> therefore Kick(oralie, domenic) Kick(oralie, domenic) and Kick(oralie, domenic) -> Cascade(domenic, willey) -> therefore Cascade(domenic, willey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The britaney does not like the ketti. The ketti segregate the norrie. The norrie is chic. If someone is enchanted then they like the britaney. If someone is chic then they like the britaney. If someone is chic and not unparented then they are retained. If someone caponize the britaney then the britaney segregate the norrie. If the norrie is chic then the norrie caponize the britaney. If the britaney segregate the norrie then the norrie caponize the ketti. The norrie does not like the ketti.", "logic": "\nnot Caponize(britaney, ketti)\nSegregate(ketti, norrie)\nChic(norrie)\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> Caponize(x, britaney))\nforall x (Chic(x) -> Caponize(x, britaney))\nforall x (Chic(x) and not Unparented(x) -> Retained(x))\nforall x (Caponize(x, britaney) -> Segregate(britaney, norrie))\nChic(norrie) -> Caponize(norrie, britaney)\nSegregate(britaney, norrie) -> Caponize(norrie, ketti)\n\nnot Caponize(norrie, ketti)\n\nChic(norrie) and forall x (Chic(x) -> Caponize(x, britaney)) -> therefore Caponize(norrie, britaney) Caponize(norrie, britaney) and forall x (Caponize(x, britaney) -> Segregate(britaney, norrie)) -> therefore Segregate(britaney, norrie) Segregate(britaney, norrie) and Segregate(britaney, norrie) -> Caponize(norrie, ketti) -> therefore Caponize(norrie, ketti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The sofia does not like the rory. The rory whicker the hiralal. The hiralal is damaging. If someone is broadloom then they like the sofia. If someone is damaging then they like the sofia. If someone is damaging and not inborn then they are limbic. If someone bustle the sofia then the sofia whicker the hiralal. If the hiralal is damaging then the hiralal bustle the sofia. If the sofia whicker the hiralal then the hiralal bustle the rory. The sofia does not like the sofia.", "logic": "\nnot Bustle(sofia, rory)\nWhicker(rory, hiralal)\nDamaging(hiralal)\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> Bustle(x, sofia))\nforall x (Damaging(x) -> Bustle(x, sofia))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and not Inborn(x) -> Limbic(x))\nforall x (Bustle(x, sofia) -> Whicker(sofia, hiralal))\nDamaging(hiralal) -> Bustle(hiralal, sofia)\nWhicker(sofia, hiralal) -> Bustle(hiralal, rory)\n\nnot Bustle(sofia, sofia)\n\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> Bustle(x, sofia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The benedikta does not like the xylia. The xylia constipate the lea. The lea is stovepiped. If someone is laced then they like the benedikta. If someone is stovepiped then they like the benedikta. If someone is stovepiped and not cool then they are miscible. If someone shoehorn the benedikta then the benedikta constipate the lea. If the lea is stovepiped then the lea shoehorn the benedikta. If the benedikta constipate the lea then the lea shoehorn the xylia. The benedikta is miscible.", "logic": "\nnot Shoehorn(benedikta, xylia)\nConstipate(xylia, lea)\nStovepiped(lea)\nforall x (Laced(x) -> Shoehorn(x, benedikta))\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Shoehorn(x, benedikta))\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) and not Cool(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, benedikta) -> Constipate(benedikta, lea))\nStovepiped(lea) -> Shoehorn(lea, benedikta)\nConstipate(benedikta, lea) -> Shoehorn(lea, xylia)\n\nMiscible(benedikta)\n\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) and not Cool(x) -> Miscible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The cati does not like the kippy. The kippy menace the mitzi. The mitzi is zenithal. If someone is starchlike then they like the cati. If someone is zenithal then they like the cati. If someone is zenithal and not senile then they are rarefied. If someone decamp the cati then the cati menace the mitzi. If the mitzi is zenithal then the mitzi decamp the cati. If the cati menace the mitzi then the mitzi decamp the kippy. The kippy is not rarefied.", "logic": "\nnot Decamp(cati, kippy)\nMenace(kippy, mitzi)\nZenithal(mitzi)\nforall x (Starchlike(x) -> Decamp(x, cati))\nforall x (Zenithal(x) -> Decamp(x, cati))\nforall x (Zenithal(x) and not Senile(x) -> Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Decamp(x, cati) -> Menace(cati, mitzi))\nZenithal(mitzi) -> Decamp(mitzi, cati)\nMenace(cati, mitzi) -> Decamp(mitzi, kippy)\n\nnot Rarefied(kippy)\n\nforall x (Zenithal(x) and not Senile(x) -> Rarefied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The georgeta does not like the karlotte. The karlotte furnish the daisi. The daisi is foppish. If someone is eviscerate then they like the georgeta. If someone is foppish then they like the georgeta. If someone is foppish and not queenlike then they are vacant. If someone drip the georgeta then the georgeta furnish the daisi. If the daisi is foppish then the daisi drip the georgeta. If the georgeta furnish the daisi then the daisi drip the karlotte. The daisi is vacant.", "logic": "\nnot Drip(georgeta, karlotte)\nFurnish(karlotte, daisi)\nFoppish(daisi)\nforall x (Eviscerate(x) -> Drip(x, georgeta))\nforall x (Foppish(x) -> Drip(x, georgeta))\nforall x (Foppish(x) and not Queenlike(x) -> Vacant(x))\nforall x (Drip(x, georgeta) -> Furnish(georgeta, daisi))\nFoppish(daisi) -> Drip(daisi, georgeta)\nFurnish(georgeta, daisi) -> Drip(daisi, karlotte)\n\nVacant(daisi)\n\nforall x (Foppish(x) and not Queenlike(x) -> Vacant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The marion does not like the burton. The burton encrimson the trixie. The trixie is bareback. If someone is disjoined then they like the marion. If someone is bareback then they like the marion. If someone is bareback and not eudaemonic then they are inerrant. If someone knock the marion then the marion encrimson the trixie. If the trixie is bareback then the trixie knock the marion. If the marion encrimson the trixie then the trixie knock the burton. The burton is not nice.", "logic": "\nnot Knock(marion, burton)\nEncrimson(burton, trixie)\nBareback(trixie)\nforall x (Disjoined(x) -> Knock(x, marion))\nforall x (Bareback(x) -> Knock(x, marion))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and not Eudaemonic(x) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Knock(x, marion) -> Encrimson(marion, trixie))\nBareback(trixie) -> Knock(trixie, marion)\nEncrimson(marion, trixie) -> Knock(trixie, burton)\n\nnot Nice(burton)\n\nnot Nice(burton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The pia does not like the chery. The chery roof the candis. The candis is sonant. If someone is unimposing then they like the pia. If someone is sonant then they like the pia. If someone is sonant and not filiform then they are snub. If someone clip the pia then the pia roof the candis. If the candis is sonant then the candis clip the pia. If the pia roof the candis then the candis clip the chery. The chery sees the pia.", "logic": "\nnot Clip(pia, chery)\nRoof(chery, candis)\nSonant(candis)\nforall x (Unimposing(x) -> Clip(x, pia))\nforall x (Sonant(x) -> Clip(x, pia))\nforall x (Sonant(x) and not Filiform(x) -> Snub(x))\nforall x (Clip(x, pia) -> Roof(pia, candis))\nSonant(candis) -> Clip(candis, pia)\nRoof(pia, candis) -> Clip(candis, chery)\n\nSees(chery, pia)\n\nSees(chery, pia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The orsola does not like the tab. The tab waste the melany. The melany is unreleased. If someone is swank then they like the orsola. If someone is unreleased then they like the orsola. If someone is unreleased and not xxxvii then they are pneumatic. If someone subsidize the orsola then the orsola waste the melany. If the melany is unreleased then the melany subsidize the orsola. If the orsola waste the melany then the melany subsidize the tab. The tab is not swank.", "logic": "\nnot Subsidize(orsola, tab)\nWaste(tab, melany)\nUnreleased(melany)\nforall x (Swank(x) -> Subsidize(x, orsola))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) -> Subsidize(x, orsola))\nforall x (Unreleased(x) and not Xxxvii(x) -> Pneumatic(x))\nforall x (Subsidize(x, orsola) -> Waste(orsola, melany))\nUnreleased(melany) -> Subsidize(melany, orsola)\nWaste(orsola, melany) -> Subsidize(melany, tab)\n\nnot Swank(tab)\n\nnot Swank(tab) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The cindie does not like the zahara. The zahara return the reid. The reid is expansible. If someone is anginose then they like the cindie. If someone is expansible then they like the cindie. If someone is expansible and not noticed then they are myeloid. If someone bedamn the cindie then the cindie return the reid. If the reid is expansible then the reid bedamn the cindie. If the cindie return the reid then the reid bedamn the zahara. The reid return the cindie.", "logic": "\nnot Bedamn(cindie, zahara)\nReturn(zahara, reid)\nExpansible(reid)\nforall x (Anginose(x) -> Bedamn(x, cindie))\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Bedamn(x, cindie))\nforall x (Expansible(x) and not Noticed(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Bedamn(x, cindie) -> Return(cindie, reid))\nExpansible(reid) -> Bedamn(reid, cindie)\nReturn(cindie, reid) -> Bedamn(reid, zahara)\n\nReturn(reid, cindie)\n\nReturn(reid, cindie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-576"} {"premises": "The lavena indenture the zebulon. The lavena is psychotic. The lavena is zealous. The lavena is nonverbal. The lavena is rotatable. The lavena is zoftig. The lavena dismay the zebulon. The lavena strap the zebulon. The zebulon indenture the lavena. The zebulon is psychotic. The zebulon is zealous. The zebulon is nonverbal. The zebulon is rotatable. The zebulon is zoftig. The zebulon dismay the lavena. The zebulon strap the lavena. If something is psychotic and it indenture the zebulon then the zebulon indenture the lavena. If something dismay the lavena and it indenture the lavena then it is nonverbal. If something strap the zebulon then it indenture the zebulon. If something is nonverbal then it strap the zebulon. If the lavena is nonverbal then the lavena indenture the zebulon. If something strap the zebulon then the zebulon indenture the lavena. The lavena is nonverbal.", "logic": "\nIndenture(lavena, zebulon)\nPsychotic(lavena)\nZealous(lavena)\nNonverbal(lavena)\nRotatable(lavena)\nZoftig(lavena)\nDismay(lavena, zebulon)\nStrap(lavena, zebulon)\nIndenture(zebulon, lavena)\nPsychotic(zebulon)\nZealous(zebulon)\nNonverbal(zebulon)\nRotatable(zebulon)\nZoftig(zebulon)\nDismay(zebulon, lavena)\nStrap(zebulon, lavena)\nforall x (Psychotic(x) and Indenture(x, zebulon) -> Indenture(zebulon, lavena))\nforall x (Dismay(x, lavena) and Indenture(x, lavena) -> Nonverbal(x))\nforall x (Strap(x, zebulon) -> Indenture(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Nonverbal(x) -> Strap(x, zebulon))\nNonverbal(lavena) -> Indenture(lavena, zebulon)\nforall x (Strap(x, zebulon) -> Indenture(zebulon, lavena))\n\nNonverbal(lavena)\n\ntherefore Nonverbal(lavena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The partha dispossess the shelia. The partha is antigenic. The partha is nazarene. The partha is foreign. The partha is nonmetal. The partha is nominal. The partha repair the shelia. The partha stylise the shelia. The shelia dispossess the partha. The shelia is antigenic. The shelia is nazarene. The shelia is foreign. The shelia is nonmetal. The shelia is nominal. The shelia repair the partha. The shelia stylise the partha. If something is antigenic and it dispossess the shelia then the shelia dispossess the partha. If something repair the partha and it dispossess the partha then it is foreign. If something stylise the shelia then it dispossess the shelia. If something is foreign then it stylise the shelia. If the partha is foreign then the partha dispossess the shelia. If something stylise the shelia then the shelia dispossess the partha. The shelia is not antigenic.", "logic": "\nDispossess(partha, shelia)\nAntigenic(partha)\nNazarene(partha)\nForeign(partha)\nNonmetal(partha)\nNominal(partha)\nRepair(partha, shelia)\nStylise(partha, shelia)\nDispossess(shelia, partha)\nAntigenic(shelia)\nNazarene(shelia)\nForeign(shelia)\nNonmetal(shelia)\nNominal(shelia)\nRepair(shelia, partha)\nStylise(shelia, partha)\nforall x (Antigenic(x) and Dispossess(x, shelia) -> Dispossess(shelia, partha))\nforall x (Repair(x, partha) and Dispossess(x, partha) -> Foreign(x))\nforall x (Stylise(x, shelia) -> Dispossess(x, shelia))\nforall x (Foreign(x) -> Stylise(x, shelia))\nForeign(partha) -> Dispossess(partha, shelia)\nforall x (Stylise(x, shelia) -> Dispossess(shelia, partha))\n\nnot Antigenic(shelia)\n\ntherefore Antigenic(shelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The marcelia convert the dyna. The marcelia is vibratory. The marcelia is dragging. The marcelia is rawboned. The marcelia is urinary. The marcelia is chained. The marcelia retail the dyna. The marcelia cere the dyna. The dyna convert the marcelia. The dyna is vibratory. The dyna is dragging. The dyna is rawboned. The dyna is urinary. The dyna is chained. The dyna retail the marcelia. The dyna cere the marcelia. If something is vibratory and it convert the dyna then the dyna convert the marcelia. If something retail the marcelia and it convert the marcelia then it is rawboned. If something cere the dyna then it convert the dyna. If something is rawboned then it cere the dyna. If the marcelia is rawboned then the marcelia convert the dyna. If something cere the dyna then the dyna convert the marcelia. The dyna cere the dyna.", "logic": "\nConvert(marcelia, dyna)\nVibratory(marcelia)\nDragging(marcelia)\nRawboned(marcelia)\nUrinary(marcelia)\nChained(marcelia)\nRetail(marcelia, dyna)\nCere(marcelia, dyna)\nConvert(dyna, marcelia)\nVibratory(dyna)\nDragging(dyna)\nRawboned(dyna)\nUrinary(dyna)\nChained(dyna)\nRetail(dyna, marcelia)\nCere(dyna, marcelia)\nforall x (Vibratory(x) and Convert(x, dyna) -> Convert(dyna, marcelia))\nforall x (Retail(x, marcelia) and Convert(x, marcelia) -> Rawboned(x))\nforall x (Cere(x, dyna) -> Convert(x, dyna))\nforall x (Rawboned(x) -> Cere(x, dyna))\nRawboned(marcelia) -> Convert(marcelia, dyna)\nforall x (Cere(x, dyna) -> Convert(dyna, marcelia))\n\nCere(dyna, dyna)\n\nRawboned(dyna) and forall x (Rawboned(x) -> Cere(x, dyna)) -> therefore Cere(dyna, dyna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The salem bootstrap the timotheus. The salem is beamish. The salem is mateless. The salem is lipotropic. The salem is bookish. The salem is controlled. The salem keel the timotheus. The salem copyread the timotheus. The timotheus bootstrap the salem. The timotheus is beamish. The timotheus is mateless. The timotheus is lipotropic. The timotheus is bookish. The timotheus is controlled. The timotheus keel the salem. The timotheus copyread the salem. If something is beamish and it bootstrap the timotheus then the timotheus bootstrap the salem. If something keel the salem and it bootstrap the salem then it is lipotropic. If something copyread the timotheus then it bootstrap the timotheus. If something is lipotropic then it copyread the timotheus. If the salem is lipotropic then the salem bootstrap the timotheus. If something copyread the timotheus then the timotheus bootstrap the salem. The timotheus does not see the timotheus.", "logic": "\nBootstrap(salem, timotheus)\nBeamish(salem)\nMateless(salem)\nLipotropic(salem)\nBookish(salem)\nControlled(salem)\nKeel(salem, timotheus)\nCopyread(salem, timotheus)\nBootstrap(timotheus, salem)\nBeamish(timotheus)\nMateless(timotheus)\nLipotropic(timotheus)\nBookish(timotheus)\nControlled(timotheus)\nKeel(timotheus, salem)\nCopyread(timotheus, salem)\nforall x (Beamish(x) and Bootstrap(x, timotheus) -> Bootstrap(timotheus, salem))\nforall x (Keel(x, salem) and Bootstrap(x, salem) -> Lipotropic(x))\nforall x (Copyread(x, timotheus) -> Bootstrap(x, timotheus))\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) -> Copyread(x, timotheus))\nLipotropic(salem) -> Bootstrap(salem, timotheus)\nforall x (Copyread(x, timotheus) -> Bootstrap(timotheus, salem))\n\nnot Copyread(timotheus, timotheus)\n\nLipotropic(timotheus) and forall x (Lipotropic(x) -> Copyread(x, timotheus)) -> therefore Copyread(timotheus, timotheus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The brande carbonize the caroleen. The brande is devalued. The brande is adventive. The brande is arch. The brande is boozy. The brande is unenrgetic. The brande counteract the caroleen. The brande heist the caroleen. The caroleen carbonize the brande. The caroleen is devalued. The caroleen is adventive. The caroleen is arch. The caroleen is boozy. The caroleen is unenrgetic. The caroleen counteract the brande. The caroleen heist the brande. If something is devalued and it carbonize the caroleen then the caroleen carbonize the brande. If something counteract the brande and it carbonize the brande then it is arch. If something heist the caroleen then it carbonize the caroleen. If something is arch then it heist the caroleen. If the brande is arch then the brande carbonize the caroleen. If something heist the caroleen then the caroleen carbonize the brande. The caroleen carbonize the caroleen.", "logic": "\nCarbonize(brande, caroleen)\nDevalued(brande)\nAdventive(brande)\nArch(brande)\nBoozy(brande)\nUnenrgetic(brande)\nCounteract(brande, caroleen)\nHeist(brande, caroleen)\nCarbonize(caroleen, brande)\nDevalued(caroleen)\nAdventive(caroleen)\nArch(caroleen)\nBoozy(caroleen)\nUnenrgetic(caroleen)\nCounteract(caroleen, brande)\nHeist(caroleen, brande)\nforall x (Devalued(x) and Carbonize(x, caroleen) -> Carbonize(caroleen, brande))\nforall x (Counteract(x, brande) and Carbonize(x, brande) -> Arch(x))\nforall x (Heist(x, caroleen) -> Carbonize(x, caroleen))\nforall x (Arch(x) -> Heist(x, caroleen))\nArch(brande) -> Carbonize(brande, caroleen)\nforall x (Heist(x, caroleen) -> Carbonize(caroleen, brande))\n\nCarbonize(caroleen, caroleen)\n\nArch(caroleen) and forall x (Arch(x) -> Heist(x, caroleen)) -> therefore Heist(caroleen, caroleen) Heist(caroleen, caroleen) and forall x (Heist(x, caroleen) -> Carbonize(x, caroleen)) -> therefore Carbonize(caroleen, caroleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The ephrem cere the abbie. The ephrem is mesonic. The ephrem is annual. The ephrem is persuasive. The ephrem is eternal. The ephrem is unfathomed. The ephrem carouse the abbie. The ephrem commix the abbie. The abbie cere the ephrem. The abbie is mesonic. The abbie is annual. The abbie is persuasive. The abbie is eternal. The abbie is unfathomed. The abbie carouse the ephrem. The abbie commix the ephrem. If something is mesonic and it cere the abbie then the abbie cere the ephrem. If something carouse the ephrem and it cere the ephrem then it is persuasive. If something commix the abbie then it cere the abbie. If something is persuasive then it commix the abbie. If the ephrem is persuasive then the ephrem cere the abbie. If something commix the abbie then the abbie cere the ephrem. The abbie does not chase the abbie.", "logic": "\nCere(ephrem, abbie)\nMesonic(ephrem)\nAnnual(ephrem)\nPersuasive(ephrem)\nEternal(ephrem)\nUnfathomed(ephrem)\nCarouse(ephrem, abbie)\nCommix(ephrem, abbie)\nCere(abbie, ephrem)\nMesonic(abbie)\nAnnual(abbie)\nPersuasive(abbie)\nEternal(abbie)\nUnfathomed(abbie)\nCarouse(abbie, ephrem)\nCommix(abbie, ephrem)\nforall x (Mesonic(x) and Cere(x, abbie) -> Cere(abbie, ephrem))\nforall x (Carouse(x, ephrem) and Cere(x, ephrem) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Commix(x, abbie) -> Cere(x, abbie))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) -> Commix(x, abbie))\nPersuasive(ephrem) -> Cere(ephrem, abbie)\nforall x (Commix(x, abbie) -> Cere(abbie, ephrem))\n\nnot Cere(abbie, abbie)\n\nPersuasive(abbie) and forall x (Persuasive(x) -> Commix(x, abbie)) -> therefore Commix(abbie, abbie) Commix(abbie, abbie) and forall x (Commix(x, abbie) -> Cere(x, abbie)) -> therefore Cere(abbie, abbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The jerrilee galumph the amalea. The jerrilee is visual. The jerrilee is inelastic. The jerrilee is inapt. The jerrilee is adducting. The jerrilee is butch. The jerrilee endue the amalea. The jerrilee assibilate the amalea. The amalea galumph the jerrilee. The amalea is visual. The amalea is inelastic. The amalea is inapt. The amalea is adducting. The amalea is butch. The amalea endue the jerrilee. The amalea assibilate the jerrilee. If something is visual and it galumph the amalea then the amalea galumph the jerrilee. If something endue the jerrilee and it galumph the jerrilee then it is inapt. If something assibilate the amalea then it galumph the amalea. If something is inapt then it assibilate the amalea. If the jerrilee is inapt then the jerrilee galumph the amalea. If something assibilate the amalea then the amalea galumph the jerrilee. The jerrilee does not see the jerrilee.", "logic": "\nGalumph(jerrilee, amalea)\nVisual(jerrilee)\nInelastic(jerrilee)\nInapt(jerrilee)\nAdducting(jerrilee)\nButch(jerrilee)\nEndue(jerrilee, amalea)\nAssibilate(jerrilee, amalea)\nGalumph(amalea, jerrilee)\nVisual(amalea)\nInelastic(amalea)\nInapt(amalea)\nAdducting(amalea)\nButch(amalea)\nEndue(amalea, jerrilee)\nAssibilate(amalea, jerrilee)\nforall x (Visual(x) and Galumph(x, amalea) -> Galumph(amalea, jerrilee))\nforall x (Endue(x, jerrilee) and Galumph(x, jerrilee) -> Inapt(x))\nforall x (Assibilate(x, amalea) -> Galumph(x, amalea))\nforall x (Inapt(x) -> Assibilate(x, amalea))\nInapt(jerrilee) -> Galumph(jerrilee, amalea)\nforall x (Assibilate(x, amalea) -> Galumph(amalea, jerrilee))\n\nnot Assibilate(jerrilee, jerrilee)\n\nnot Assibilate(jerrilee, jerrilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The vernor shirk the bryant. The vernor is uncoated. The vernor is pneumatic. The vernor is matured. The vernor is ministrant. The vernor is expressed. The vernor winkle the bryant. The vernor illegalize the bryant. The bryant shirk the vernor. The bryant is uncoated. The bryant is pneumatic. The bryant is matured. The bryant is ministrant. The bryant is expressed. The bryant winkle the vernor. The bryant illegalize the vernor. If something is uncoated and it shirk the bryant then the bryant shirk the vernor. If something winkle the vernor and it shirk the vernor then it is matured. If something illegalize the bryant then it shirk the bryant. If something is matured then it illegalize the bryant. If the vernor is matured then the vernor shirk the bryant. If something illegalize the bryant then the bryant shirk the vernor. The bryant winkle the bryant.", "logic": "\nShirk(vernor, bryant)\nUncoated(vernor)\nPneumatic(vernor)\nMatured(vernor)\nMinistrant(vernor)\nExpressed(vernor)\nWinkle(vernor, bryant)\nIllegalize(vernor, bryant)\nShirk(bryant, vernor)\nUncoated(bryant)\nPneumatic(bryant)\nMatured(bryant)\nMinistrant(bryant)\nExpressed(bryant)\nWinkle(bryant, vernor)\nIllegalize(bryant, vernor)\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and Shirk(x, bryant) -> Shirk(bryant, vernor))\nforall x (Winkle(x, vernor) and Shirk(x, vernor) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Illegalize(x, bryant) -> Shirk(x, bryant))\nforall x (Matured(x) -> Illegalize(x, bryant))\nMatured(vernor) -> Shirk(vernor, bryant)\nforall x (Illegalize(x, bryant) -> Shirk(bryant, vernor))\n\nWinkle(bryant, bryant)\n\nWinkle(bryant, bryant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The jesselyn cypher the sabra. The jesselyn is exocrine. The jesselyn is trepid. The jesselyn is hairy. The jesselyn is agonadal. The jesselyn is invading. The jesselyn edge the sabra. The jesselyn wing the sabra. The sabra cypher the jesselyn. The sabra is exocrine. The sabra is trepid. The sabra is hairy. The sabra is agonadal. The sabra is invading. The sabra edge the jesselyn. The sabra wing the jesselyn. If something is exocrine and it cypher the sabra then the sabra cypher the jesselyn. If something edge the jesselyn and it cypher the jesselyn then it is hairy. If something wing the sabra then it cypher the sabra. If something is hairy then it wing the sabra. If the jesselyn is hairy then the jesselyn cypher the sabra. If something wing the sabra then the sabra cypher the jesselyn. The jesselyn does not like the jesselyn.", "logic": "\nCypher(jesselyn, sabra)\nExocrine(jesselyn)\nTrepid(jesselyn)\nHairy(jesselyn)\nAgonadal(jesselyn)\nInvading(jesselyn)\nEdge(jesselyn, sabra)\nWing(jesselyn, sabra)\nCypher(sabra, jesselyn)\nExocrine(sabra)\nTrepid(sabra)\nHairy(sabra)\nAgonadal(sabra)\nInvading(sabra)\nEdge(sabra, jesselyn)\nWing(sabra, jesselyn)\nforall x (Exocrine(x) and Cypher(x, sabra) -> Cypher(sabra, jesselyn))\nforall x (Edge(x, jesselyn) and Cypher(x, jesselyn) -> Hairy(x))\nforall x (Wing(x, sabra) -> Cypher(x, sabra))\nforall x (Hairy(x) -> Wing(x, sabra))\nHairy(jesselyn) -> Cypher(jesselyn, sabra)\nforall x (Wing(x, sabra) -> Cypher(sabra, jesselyn))\n\nnot Edge(jesselyn, jesselyn)\n\nnot Edge(jesselyn, jesselyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The robert formalize the lauri. The robert is assamese. The robert is pretorian. The robert is begotten. The robert is passive. The robert is membranous. The robert begin the lauri. The robert scrabble the lauri. The lauri formalize the robert. The lauri is assamese. The lauri is pretorian. The lauri is begotten. The lauri is passive. The lauri is membranous. The lauri begin the robert. The lauri scrabble the robert. If something is assamese and it formalize the lauri then the lauri formalize the robert. If something begin the robert and it formalize the robert then it is begotten. If something scrabble the lauri then it formalize the lauri. If something is begotten then it scrabble the lauri. If the robert is begotten then the robert formalize the lauri. If something scrabble the lauri then the lauri formalize the robert. The robert formalize the robert.", "logic": "\nFormalize(robert, lauri)\nAssamese(robert)\nPretorian(robert)\nBegotten(robert)\nPassive(robert)\nMembranous(robert)\nBegin(robert, lauri)\nScrabble(robert, lauri)\nFormalize(lauri, robert)\nAssamese(lauri)\nPretorian(lauri)\nBegotten(lauri)\nPassive(lauri)\nMembranous(lauri)\nBegin(lauri, robert)\nScrabble(lauri, robert)\nforall x (Assamese(x) and Formalize(x, lauri) -> Formalize(lauri, robert))\nforall x (Begin(x, robert) and Formalize(x, robert) -> Begotten(x))\nforall x (Scrabble(x, lauri) -> Formalize(x, lauri))\nforall x (Begotten(x) -> Scrabble(x, lauri))\nBegotten(robert) -> Formalize(robert, lauri)\nforall x (Scrabble(x, lauri) -> Formalize(lauri, robert))\n\nFormalize(robert, robert)\n\nFormalize(robert, robert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1967"} {"premises": "The angele does not chase the zandra. The angele is mated. The angele is sunrise. The angele is imposed. The angele does not see the zandra. The benoite patrol the angele. The benoite patrol the zandra. The benoite is imposed. The benoite misdate the angele. The zandra patrol the angele. The zandra does not chase the benoite. The zandra is masted. The zandra is garlicky. The zandra misdate the benoite. The zandra slack the angele. If something slack the zandra then the zandra slack the benoite. If something patrol the angele and it misdate the benoite then the angele slack the benoite. If the zandra misdate the benoite and the zandra is masted then the benoite slack the zandra. If the zandra misdate the angele then the angele is masted. If something misdate the zandra then it slack the zandra. If something slack the angele then it is sunrise. If the zandra slack the benoite then the benoite slack the angele. If something misdate the zandra then the zandra misdate the angele. The angele does not chase the zandra.", "logic": "\nnot Patrol(angele, zandra)\nMated(angele)\nSunrise(angele)\nImposed(angele)\nnot Slack(angele, zandra)\nPatrol(benoite, angele)\nPatrol(benoite, zandra)\nImposed(benoite)\nMisdate(benoite, angele)\nPatrol(zandra, angele)\nnot Patrol(zandra, benoite)\nMasted(zandra)\nGarlicky(zandra)\nMisdate(zandra, benoite)\nSlack(zandra, angele)\nforall x (Slack(x, zandra) -> Slack(zandra, benoite))\nforall x (Patrol(x, angele) and Misdate(x, benoite) -> Slack(angele, benoite))\nMisdate(zandra, benoite) and Masted(zandra) -> Slack(benoite, zandra)\nMisdate(zandra, angele) -> Masted(angele)\nforall x (Misdate(x, zandra) -> Slack(x, zandra))\nforall x (Slack(x, angele) -> Sunrise(x))\nSlack(zandra, benoite) -> Slack(benoite, angele)\nforall x (Misdate(x, zandra) -> Misdate(zandra, angele))\n\nnot Patrol(angele, zandra)\n\ntherefore not Patrol(angele, zandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The gisele does not chase the pieter. The gisele is splotched. The gisele is antitumour. The gisele is exegetical. The gisele does not see the pieter. The ugo contour the gisele. The ugo contour the pieter. The ugo is exegetical. The ugo thrive the gisele. The pieter contour the gisele. The pieter does not chase the ugo. The pieter is scummy. The pieter is awnless. The pieter thrive the ugo. The pieter avoid the gisele. If something avoid the pieter then the pieter avoid the ugo. If something contour the gisele and it thrive the ugo then the gisele avoid the ugo. If the pieter thrive the ugo and the pieter is scummy then the ugo avoid the pieter. If the pieter thrive the gisele then the gisele is scummy. If something thrive the pieter then it avoid the pieter. If something avoid the gisele then it is antitumour. If the pieter avoid the ugo then the ugo avoid the gisele. If something thrive the pieter then the pieter thrive the gisele. The gisele is not splotched.", "logic": "\nnot Contour(gisele, pieter)\nSplotched(gisele)\nAntitumour(gisele)\nExegetical(gisele)\nnot Avoid(gisele, pieter)\nContour(ugo, gisele)\nContour(ugo, pieter)\nExegetical(ugo)\nThrive(ugo, gisele)\nContour(pieter, gisele)\nnot Contour(pieter, ugo)\nScummy(pieter)\nAwnless(pieter)\nThrive(pieter, ugo)\nAvoid(pieter, gisele)\nforall x (Avoid(x, pieter) -> Avoid(pieter, ugo))\nforall x (Contour(x, gisele) and Thrive(x, ugo) -> Avoid(gisele, ugo))\nThrive(pieter, ugo) and Scummy(pieter) -> Avoid(ugo, pieter)\nThrive(pieter, gisele) -> Scummy(gisele)\nforall x (Thrive(x, pieter) -> Avoid(x, pieter))\nforall x (Avoid(x, gisele) -> Antitumour(x))\nAvoid(pieter, ugo) -> Avoid(ugo, gisele)\nforall x (Thrive(x, pieter) -> Thrive(pieter, gisele))\n\nnot Splotched(gisele)\n\ntherefore Splotched(gisele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The eileen does not chase the stanton. The eileen is sybaritic. The eileen is pasteurian. The eileen is infertile. The eileen does not see the stanton. The ervin airbrush the eileen. The ervin airbrush the stanton. The ervin is infertile. The ervin inveigle the eileen. The stanton airbrush the eileen. The stanton does not chase the ervin. The stanton is prayerful. The stanton is twofold. The stanton inveigle the ervin. The stanton fizzle the eileen. If something fizzle the stanton then the stanton fizzle the ervin. If something airbrush the eileen and it inveigle the ervin then the eileen fizzle the ervin. If the stanton inveigle the ervin and the stanton is prayerful then the ervin fizzle the stanton. If the stanton inveigle the eileen then the eileen is prayerful. If something inveigle the stanton then it fizzle the stanton. If something fizzle the eileen then it is pasteurian. If the stanton fizzle the ervin then the ervin fizzle the eileen. If something inveigle the stanton then the stanton inveigle the eileen. The ervin fizzle the stanton.", "logic": "\nnot Airbrush(eileen, stanton)\nSybaritic(eileen)\nPasteurian(eileen)\nInfertile(eileen)\nnot Fizzle(eileen, stanton)\nAirbrush(ervin, eileen)\nAirbrush(ervin, stanton)\nInfertile(ervin)\nInveigle(ervin, eileen)\nAirbrush(stanton, eileen)\nnot Airbrush(stanton, ervin)\nPrayerful(stanton)\nTwofold(stanton)\nInveigle(stanton, ervin)\nFizzle(stanton, eileen)\nforall x (Fizzle(x, stanton) -> Fizzle(stanton, ervin))\nforall x (Airbrush(x, eileen) and Inveigle(x, ervin) -> Fizzle(eileen, ervin))\nInveigle(stanton, ervin) and Prayerful(stanton) -> Fizzle(ervin, stanton)\nInveigle(stanton, eileen) -> Prayerful(eileen)\nforall x (Inveigle(x, stanton) -> Fizzle(x, stanton))\nforall x (Fizzle(x, eileen) -> Pasteurian(x))\nFizzle(stanton, ervin) -> Fizzle(ervin, eileen)\nforall x (Inveigle(x, stanton) -> Inveigle(stanton, eileen))\n\nFizzle(ervin, stanton)\n\nInveigle(stanton, ervin) and Prayerful(stanton) and Inveigle(stanton, ervin) and Prayerful(stanton) -> Fizzle(ervin, stanton) -> therefore Fizzle(ervin, stanton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The emmalee does not chase the duane. The emmalee is fractional. The emmalee is septate. The emmalee is unmannerly. The emmalee does not see the duane. The reilly heap the emmalee. The reilly heap the duane. The reilly is unmannerly. The reilly rustle the emmalee. The duane heap the emmalee. The duane does not chase the reilly. The duane is resupine. The duane is yeatsian. The duane rustle the reilly. The duane disembroil the emmalee. If something disembroil the duane then the duane disembroil the reilly. If something heap the emmalee and it rustle the reilly then the emmalee disembroil the reilly. If the duane rustle the reilly and the duane is resupine then the reilly disembroil the duane. If the duane rustle the emmalee then the emmalee is resupine. If something rustle the duane then it disembroil the duane. If something disembroil the emmalee then it is septate. If the duane disembroil the reilly then the reilly disembroil the emmalee. If something rustle the duane then the duane rustle the emmalee. The emmalee does not see the reilly.", "logic": "\nnot Heap(emmalee, duane)\nFractional(emmalee)\nSeptate(emmalee)\nUnmannerly(emmalee)\nnot Disembroil(emmalee, duane)\nHeap(reilly, emmalee)\nHeap(reilly, duane)\nUnmannerly(reilly)\nRustle(reilly, emmalee)\nHeap(duane, emmalee)\nnot Heap(duane, reilly)\nResupine(duane)\nYeatsian(duane)\nRustle(duane, reilly)\nDisembroil(duane, emmalee)\nforall x (Disembroil(x, duane) -> Disembroil(duane, reilly))\nforall x (Heap(x, emmalee) and Rustle(x, reilly) -> Disembroil(emmalee, reilly))\nRustle(duane, reilly) and Resupine(duane) -> Disembroil(reilly, duane)\nRustle(duane, emmalee) -> Resupine(emmalee)\nforall x (Rustle(x, duane) -> Disembroil(x, duane))\nforall x (Disembroil(x, emmalee) -> Septate(x))\nDisembroil(duane, reilly) -> Disembroil(reilly, emmalee)\nforall x (Rustle(x, duane) -> Rustle(duane, emmalee))\n\nnot Disembroil(emmalee, reilly)\n\nHeap(duane, emmalee) and Rustle(duane, reilly) and forall x (Heap(x, emmalee) and Rustle(x, reilly) -> Disembroil(emmalee, reilly)) -> therefore Disembroil(emmalee, reilly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The oleg does not chase the rona. The oleg is jewelled. The oleg is monoclinal. The oleg is upstair. The oleg does not see the rona. The noach author the oleg. The noach author the rona. The noach is upstair. The noach aggrade the oleg. The rona author the oleg. The rona does not chase the noach. The rona is stone. The rona is unending. The rona aggrade the noach. The rona backstroke the oleg. If something backstroke the rona then the rona backstroke the noach. If something author the oleg and it aggrade the noach then the oleg backstroke the noach. If the rona aggrade the noach and the rona is stone then the noach backstroke the rona. If the rona aggrade the oleg then the oleg is stone. If something aggrade the rona then it backstroke the rona. If something backstroke the oleg then it is monoclinal. If the rona backstroke the noach then the noach backstroke the oleg. If something aggrade the rona then the rona aggrade the oleg. The rona backstroke the noach.", "logic": "\nnot Author(oleg, rona)\nJewelled(oleg)\nMonoclinal(oleg)\nUpstair(oleg)\nnot Backstroke(oleg, rona)\nAuthor(noach, oleg)\nAuthor(noach, rona)\nUpstair(noach)\nAggrade(noach, oleg)\nAuthor(rona, oleg)\nnot Author(rona, noach)\nStone(rona)\nUnending(rona)\nAggrade(rona, noach)\nBackstroke(rona, oleg)\nforall x (Backstroke(x, rona) -> Backstroke(rona, noach))\nforall x (Author(x, oleg) and Aggrade(x, noach) -> Backstroke(oleg, noach))\nAggrade(rona, noach) and Stone(rona) -> Backstroke(noach, rona)\nAggrade(rona, oleg) -> Stone(oleg)\nforall x (Aggrade(x, rona) -> Backstroke(x, rona))\nforall x (Backstroke(x, oleg) -> Monoclinal(x))\nBackstroke(rona, noach) -> Backstroke(noach, oleg)\nforall x (Aggrade(x, rona) -> Aggrade(rona, oleg))\n\nBackstroke(rona, noach)\n\nAggrade(rona, noach) and Stone(rona) and Aggrade(rona, noach) and Stone(rona) -> Backstroke(noach, rona) -> therefore Backstroke(noach, rona) Backstroke(noach, rona) and forall x (Backstroke(x, rona) -> Backstroke(rona, noach)) -> therefore Backstroke(rona, noach)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The rosette does not chase the carolyn. The rosette is garbled. The rosette is agitative. The rosette is shaped. The rosette does not see the carolyn. The dorisa disoblige the rosette. The dorisa disoblige the carolyn. The dorisa is shaped. The dorisa concrete the rosette. The carolyn disoblige the rosette. The carolyn does not chase the dorisa. The carolyn is helminthic. The carolyn is mistaken. The carolyn concrete the dorisa. The carolyn blubber the rosette. If something blubber the carolyn then the carolyn blubber the dorisa. If something disoblige the rosette and it concrete the dorisa then the rosette blubber the dorisa. If the carolyn concrete the dorisa and the carolyn is helminthic then the dorisa blubber the carolyn. If the carolyn concrete the rosette then the rosette is helminthic. If something concrete the carolyn then it blubber the carolyn. If something blubber the rosette then it is agitative. If the carolyn blubber the dorisa then the dorisa blubber the rosette. If something concrete the carolyn then the carolyn concrete the rosette. The carolyn does not see the dorisa.", "logic": "\nnot Disoblige(rosette, carolyn)\nGarbled(rosette)\nAgitative(rosette)\nShaped(rosette)\nnot Blubber(rosette, carolyn)\nDisoblige(dorisa, rosette)\nDisoblige(dorisa, carolyn)\nShaped(dorisa)\nConcrete(dorisa, rosette)\nDisoblige(carolyn, rosette)\nnot Disoblige(carolyn, dorisa)\nHelminthic(carolyn)\nMistaken(carolyn)\nConcrete(carolyn, dorisa)\nBlubber(carolyn, rosette)\nforall x (Blubber(x, carolyn) -> Blubber(carolyn, dorisa))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, rosette) and Concrete(x, dorisa) -> Blubber(rosette, dorisa))\nConcrete(carolyn, dorisa) and Helminthic(carolyn) -> Blubber(dorisa, carolyn)\nConcrete(carolyn, rosette) -> Helminthic(rosette)\nforall x (Concrete(x, carolyn) -> Blubber(x, carolyn))\nforall x (Blubber(x, rosette) -> Agitative(x))\nBlubber(carolyn, dorisa) -> Blubber(dorisa, rosette)\nforall x (Concrete(x, carolyn) -> Concrete(carolyn, rosette))\n\nnot Blubber(carolyn, dorisa)\n\nConcrete(carolyn, dorisa) and Helminthic(carolyn) and Concrete(carolyn, dorisa) and Helminthic(carolyn) -> Blubber(dorisa, carolyn) -> therefore Blubber(dorisa, carolyn) Blubber(dorisa, carolyn) and forall x (Blubber(x, carolyn) -> Blubber(carolyn, dorisa)) -> therefore Blubber(carolyn, dorisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The sheelagh does not chase the tracie. The sheelagh is straggly. The sheelagh is necked. The sheelagh is ordinary. The sheelagh does not see the tracie. The lilllie pedal the sheelagh. The lilllie pedal the tracie. The lilllie is ordinary. The lilllie discourage the sheelagh. The tracie pedal the sheelagh. The tracie does not chase the lilllie. The tracie is recursive. The tracie is unverified. The tracie discourage the lilllie. The tracie thumbtack the sheelagh. If something thumbtack the tracie then the tracie thumbtack the lilllie. If something pedal the sheelagh and it discourage the lilllie then the sheelagh thumbtack the lilllie. If the tracie discourage the lilllie and the tracie is recursive then the lilllie thumbtack the tracie. If the tracie discourage the sheelagh then the sheelagh is recursive. If something discourage the tracie then it thumbtack the tracie. If something thumbtack the sheelagh then it is necked. If the tracie thumbtack the lilllie then the lilllie thumbtack the sheelagh. If something discourage the tracie then the tracie discourage the sheelagh. The lilllie thumbtack the sheelagh.", "logic": "\nnot Pedal(sheelagh, tracie)\nStraggly(sheelagh)\nNecked(sheelagh)\nOrdinary(sheelagh)\nnot Thumbtack(sheelagh, tracie)\nPedal(lilllie, sheelagh)\nPedal(lilllie, tracie)\nOrdinary(lilllie)\nDiscourage(lilllie, sheelagh)\nPedal(tracie, sheelagh)\nnot Pedal(tracie, lilllie)\nRecursive(tracie)\nUnverified(tracie)\nDiscourage(tracie, lilllie)\nThumbtack(tracie, sheelagh)\nforall x (Thumbtack(x, tracie) -> Thumbtack(tracie, lilllie))\nforall x (Pedal(x, sheelagh) and Discourage(x, lilllie) -> Thumbtack(sheelagh, lilllie))\nDiscourage(tracie, lilllie) and Recursive(tracie) -> Thumbtack(lilllie, tracie)\nDiscourage(tracie, sheelagh) -> Recursive(sheelagh)\nforall x (Discourage(x, tracie) -> Thumbtack(x, tracie))\nforall x (Thumbtack(x, sheelagh) -> Necked(x))\nThumbtack(tracie, lilllie) -> Thumbtack(lilllie, sheelagh)\nforall x (Discourage(x, tracie) -> Discourage(tracie, sheelagh))\n\nThumbtack(lilllie, sheelagh)\n\nDiscourage(tracie, lilllie) and Recursive(tracie) and Discourage(tracie, lilllie) and Recursive(tracie) -> Thumbtack(lilllie, tracie) -> therefore Thumbtack(lilllie, tracie) Thumbtack(lilllie, tracie) and forall x (Thumbtack(x, tracie) -> Thumbtack(tracie, lilllie)) -> therefore Thumbtack(tracie, lilllie) Thumbtack(tracie, lilllie) and Thumbtack(tracie, lilllie) -> Thumbtack(lilllie, sheelagh) -> therefore Thumbtack(lilllie, sheelagh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The gustie does not chase the pavia. The gustie is lucullan. The gustie is hindoo. The gustie is confluent. The gustie does not see the pavia. The mickey begild the gustie. The mickey begild the pavia. The mickey is confluent. The mickey factor the gustie. The pavia begild the gustie. The pavia does not chase the mickey. The pavia is swishy. The pavia is nonimmune. The pavia factor the mickey. The pavia snick the gustie. If something snick the pavia then the pavia snick the mickey. If something begild the gustie and it factor the mickey then the gustie snick the mickey. If the pavia factor the mickey and the pavia is swishy then the mickey snick the pavia. If the pavia factor the gustie then the gustie is swishy. If something factor the pavia then it snick the pavia. If something snick the gustie then it is hindoo. If the pavia snick the mickey then the mickey snick the gustie. If something factor the pavia then the pavia factor the gustie. The mickey does not see the gustie.", "logic": "\nnot Begild(gustie, pavia)\nLucullan(gustie)\nHindoo(gustie)\nConfluent(gustie)\nnot Snick(gustie, pavia)\nBegild(mickey, gustie)\nBegild(mickey, pavia)\nConfluent(mickey)\nFactor(mickey, gustie)\nBegild(pavia, gustie)\nnot Begild(pavia, mickey)\nSwishy(pavia)\nNonimmune(pavia)\nFactor(pavia, mickey)\nSnick(pavia, gustie)\nforall x (Snick(x, pavia) -> Snick(pavia, mickey))\nforall x (Begild(x, gustie) and Factor(x, mickey) -> Snick(gustie, mickey))\nFactor(pavia, mickey) and Swishy(pavia) -> Snick(mickey, pavia)\nFactor(pavia, gustie) -> Swishy(gustie)\nforall x (Factor(x, pavia) -> Snick(x, pavia))\nforall x (Snick(x, gustie) -> Hindoo(x))\nSnick(pavia, mickey) -> Snick(mickey, gustie)\nforall x (Factor(x, pavia) -> Factor(pavia, gustie))\n\nnot Snick(mickey, gustie)\n\nFactor(pavia, mickey) and Swishy(pavia) and Factor(pavia, mickey) and Swishy(pavia) -> Snick(mickey, pavia) -> therefore Snick(mickey, pavia) Snick(mickey, pavia) and forall x (Snick(x, pavia) -> Snick(pavia, mickey)) -> therefore Snick(pavia, mickey) Snick(pavia, mickey) and Snick(pavia, mickey) -> Snick(mickey, gustie) -> therefore Snick(mickey, gustie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The renault does not chase the cordelie. The renault is homoerotic. The renault is sexual. The renault is bushed. The renault does not see the cordelie. The stefan tourney the renault. The stefan tourney the cordelie. The stefan is bushed. The stefan emulate the renault. The cordelie tourney the renault. The cordelie does not chase the stefan. The cordelie is unbranded. The cordelie is pleased. The cordelie emulate the stefan. The cordelie disfavor the renault. If something disfavor the cordelie then the cordelie disfavor the stefan. If something tourney the renault and it emulate the stefan then the renault disfavor the stefan. If the cordelie emulate the stefan and the cordelie is unbranded then the stefan disfavor the cordelie. If the cordelie emulate the renault then the renault is unbranded. If something emulate the cordelie then it disfavor the cordelie. If something disfavor the renault then it is sexual. If the cordelie disfavor the stefan then the stefan disfavor the renault. If something emulate the cordelie then the cordelie emulate the renault. The cordelie does not see the cordelie.", "logic": "\nnot Tourney(renault, cordelie)\nHomoerotic(renault)\nSexual(renault)\nBushed(renault)\nnot Disfavor(renault, cordelie)\nTourney(stefan, renault)\nTourney(stefan, cordelie)\nBushed(stefan)\nEmulate(stefan, renault)\nTourney(cordelie, renault)\nnot Tourney(cordelie, stefan)\nUnbranded(cordelie)\nPleased(cordelie)\nEmulate(cordelie, stefan)\nDisfavor(cordelie, renault)\nforall x (Disfavor(x, cordelie) -> Disfavor(cordelie, stefan))\nforall x (Tourney(x, renault) and Emulate(x, stefan) -> Disfavor(renault, stefan))\nEmulate(cordelie, stefan) and Unbranded(cordelie) -> Disfavor(stefan, cordelie)\nEmulate(cordelie, renault) -> Unbranded(renault)\nforall x (Emulate(x, cordelie) -> Disfavor(x, cordelie))\nforall x (Disfavor(x, renault) -> Sexual(x))\nDisfavor(cordelie, stefan) -> Disfavor(stefan, renault)\nforall x (Emulate(x, cordelie) -> Emulate(cordelie, renault))\n\nnot Disfavor(cordelie, cordelie)\n\nforall x (Emulate(x, cordelie) -> Disfavor(x, cordelie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The luci does not chase the karylin. The luci is tasteless. The luci is palladian. The luci is wearying. The luci does not see the karylin. The alvera weigh the luci. The alvera weigh the karylin. The alvera is wearying. The alvera stymie the luci. The karylin weigh the luci. The karylin does not chase the alvera. The karylin is predaceous. The karylin is scalene. The karylin stymie the alvera. The karylin reorganise the luci. If something reorganise the karylin then the karylin reorganise the alvera. If something weigh the luci and it stymie the alvera then the luci reorganise the alvera. If the karylin stymie the alvera and the karylin is predaceous then the alvera reorganise the karylin. If the karylin stymie the luci then the luci is predaceous. If something stymie the karylin then it reorganise the karylin. If something reorganise the luci then it is palladian. If the karylin reorganise the alvera then the alvera reorganise the luci. If something stymie the karylin then the karylin stymie the luci. The luci is predaceous.", "logic": "\nnot Weigh(luci, karylin)\nTasteless(luci)\nPalladian(luci)\nWearying(luci)\nnot Reorganise(luci, karylin)\nWeigh(alvera, luci)\nWeigh(alvera, karylin)\nWearying(alvera)\nStymie(alvera, luci)\nWeigh(karylin, luci)\nnot Weigh(karylin, alvera)\nPredaceous(karylin)\nScalene(karylin)\nStymie(karylin, alvera)\nReorganise(karylin, luci)\nforall x (Reorganise(x, karylin) -> Reorganise(karylin, alvera))\nforall x (Weigh(x, luci) and Stymie(x, alvera) -> Reorganise(luci, alvera))\nStymie(karylin, alvera) and Predaceous(karylin) -> Reorganise(alvera, karylin)\nStymie(karylin, luci) -> Predaceous(luci)\nforall x (Stymie(x, karylin) -> Reorganise(x, karylin))\nforall x (Reorganise(x, luci) -> Palladian(x))\nReorganise(karylin, alvera) -> Reorganise(alvera, luci)\nforall x (Stymie(x, karylin) -> Stymie(karylin, luci))\n\nPredaceous(luci)\n\nStymie(karylin, luci) -> Predaceous(luci) <- forall x (Stymie(x, karylin) -> Stymie(karylin, luci)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The wesley does not chase the dyann. The wesley is uncomely. The wesley is flint. The wesley is unnamed. The wesley does not see the dyann. The lark lactate the wesley. The lark lactate the dyann. The lark is unnamed. The lark kotow the wesley. The dyann lactate the wesley. The dyann does not chase the lark. The dyann is amorous. The dyann is alexic. The dyann kotow the lark. The dyann putt the wesley. If something putt the dyann then the dyann putt the lark. If something lactate the wesley and it kotow the lark then the wesley putt the lark. If the dyann kotow the lark and the dyann is amorous then the lark putt the dyann. If the dyann kotow the wesley then the wesley is amorous. If something kotow the dyann then it putt the dyann. If something putt the wesley then it is flint. If the dyann putt the lark then the lark putt the wesley. If something kotow the dyann then the dyann kotow the wesley. The dyann does not like the wesley.", "logic": "\nnot Lactate(wesley, dyann)\nUncomely(wesley)\nFlint(wesley)\nUnnamed(wesley)\nnot Putt(wesley, dyann)\nLactate(lark, wesley)\nLactate(lark, dyann)\nUnnamed(lark)\nKotow(lark, wesley)\nLactate(dyann, wesley)\nnot Lactate(dyann, lark)\nAmorous(dyann)\nAlexic(dyann)\nKotow(dyann, lark)\nPutt(dyann, wesley)\nforall x (Putt(x, dyann) -> Putt(dyann, lark))\nforall x (Lactate(x, wesley) and Kotow(x, lark) -> Putt(wesley, lark))\nKotow(dyann, lark) and Amorous(dyann) -> Putt(lark, dyann)\nKotow(dyann, wesley) -> Amorous(wesley)\nforall x (Kotow(x, dyann) -> Putt(x, dyann))\nforall x (Putt(x, wesley) -> Flint(x))\nPutt(dyann, lark) -> Putt(lark, wesley)\nforall x (Kotow(x, dyann) -> Kotow(dyann, wesley))\n\nnot Kotow(dyann, wesley)\n\nforall x (Kotow(x, dyann) -> Kotow(dyann, wesley)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The jervis does not chase the fifi. The jervis is undivided. The jervis is skinnerian. The jervis is indistinct. The jervis does not see the fifi. The roanna abate the jervis. The roanna abate the fifi. The roanna is indistinct. The roanna pole the jervis. The fifi abate the jervis. The fifi does not chase the roanna. The fifi is remedial. The fifi is bolivian. The fifi pole the roanna. The fifi scarify the jervis. If something scarify the fifi then the fifi scarify the roanna. If something abate the jervis and it pole the roanna then the jervis scarify the roanna. If the fifi pole the roanna and the fifi is remedial then the roanna scarify the fifi. If the fifi pole the jervis then the jervis is remedial. If something pole the fifi then it scarify the fifi. If something scarify the jervis then it is skinnerian. If the fifi scarify the roanna then the roanna scarify the jervis. If something pole the fifi then the fifi pole the jervis. The roanna pole the fifi.", "logic": "\nnot Abate(jervis, fifi)\nUndivided(jervis)\nSkinnerian(jervis)\nIndistinct(jervis)\nnot Scarify(jervis, fifi)\nAbate(roanna, jervis)\nAbate(roanna, fifi)\nIndistinct(roanna)\nPole(roanna, jervis)\nAbate(fifi, jervis)\nnot Abate(fifi, roanna)\nRemedial(fifi)\nBolivian(fifi)\nPole(fifi, roanna)\nScarify(fifi, jervis)\nforall x (Scarify(x, fifi) -> Scarify(fifi, roanna))\nforall x (Abate(x, jervis) and Pole(x, roanna) -> Scarify(jervis, roanna))\nPole(fifi, roanna) and Remedial(fifi) -> Scarify(roanna, fifi)\nPole(fifi, jervis) -> Remedial(jervis)\nforall x (Pole(x, fifi) -> Scarify(x, fifi))\nforall x (Scarify(x, jervis) -> Skinnerian(x))\nScarify(fifi, roanna) -> Scarify(roanna, jervis)\nforall x (Pole(x, fifi) -> Pole(fifi, jervis))\n\nPole(roanna, fifi)\n\nPole(roanna, fifi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The theresita does not chase the benni. The theresita is wolflike. The theresita is accented. The theresita is burdensome. The theresita does not see the benni. The sydel guide the theresita. The sydel guide the benni. The sydel is burdensome. The sydel snafu the theresita. The benni guide the theresita. The benni does not chase the sydel. The benni is breathless. The benni is uncurving. The benni snafu the sydel. The benni solder the theresita. If something solder the benni then the benni solder the sydel. If something guide the theresita and it snafu the sydel then the theresita solder the sydel. If the benni snafu the sydel and the benni is breathless then the sydel solder the benni. If the benni snafu the theresita then the theresita is breathless. If something snafu the benni then it solder the benni. If something solder the theresita then it is accented. If the benni solder the sydel then the sydel solder the theresita. If something snafu the benni then the benni snafu the theresita. The theresita does not chase the theresita.", "logic": "\nnot Guide(theresita, benni)\nWolflike(theresita)\nAccented(theresita)\nBurdensome(theresita)\nnot Solder(theresita, benni)\nGuide(sydel, theresita)\nGuide(sydel, benni)\nBurdensome(sydel)\nSnafu(sydel, theresita)\nGuide(benni, theresita)\nnot Guide(benni, sydel)\nBreathless(benni)\nUncurving(benni)\nSnafu(benni, sydel)\nSolder(benni, theresita)\nforall x (Solder(x, benni) -> Solder(benni, sydel))\nforall x (Guide(x, theresita) and Snafu(x, sydel) -> Solder(theresita, sydel))\nSnafu(benni, sydel) and Breathless(benni) -> Solder(sydel, benni)\nSnafu(benni, theresita) -> Breathless(theresita)\nforall x (Snafu(x, benni) -> Solder(x, benni))\nforall x (Solder(x, theresita) -> Accented(x))\nSolder(benni, sydel) -> Solder(sydel, theresita)\nforall x (Snafu(x, benni) -> Snafu(benni, theresita))\n\nnot Guide(theresita, theresita)\n\nnot Guide(theresita, theresita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The margo does not chase the christ. The margo is poisonous. The margo is amharic. The margo is ratlike. The margo does not see the christ. The ginni lark the margo. The ginni lark the christ. The ginni is ratlike. The ginni silver the margo. The christ lark the margo. The christ does not chase the ginni. The christ is unwatchful. The christ is fulfilled. The christ silver the ginni. The christ divine the margo. If something divine the christ then the christ divine the ginni. If something lark the margo and it silver the ginni then the margo divine the ginni. If the christ silver the ginni and the christ is unwatchful then the ginni divine the christ. If the christ silver the margo then the margo is unwatchful. If something silver the christ then it divine the christ. If something divine the margo then it is amharic. If the christ divine the ginni then the ginni divine the margo. If something silver the christ then the christ silver the margo. The margo silver the margo.", "logic": "\nnot Lark(margo, christ)\nPoisonous(margo)\nAmharic(margo)\nRatlike(margo)\nnot Divine(margo, christ)\nLark(ginni, margo)\nLark(ginni, christ)\nRatlike(ginni)\nSilver(ginni, margo)\nLark(christ, margo)\nnot Lark(christ, ginni)\nUnwatchful(christ)\nFulfilled(christ)\nSilver(christ, ginni)\nDivine(christ, margo)\nforall x (Divine(x, christ) -> Divine(christ, ginni))\nforall x (Lark(x, margo) and Silver(x, ginni) -> Divine(margo, ginni))\nSilver(christ, ginni) and Unwatchful(christ) -> Divine(ginni, christ)\nSilver(christ, margo) -> Unwatchful(margo)\nforall x (Silver(x, christ) -> Divine(x, christ))\nforall x (Divine(x, margo) -> Amharic(x))\nDivine(christ, ginni) -> Divine(ginni, margo)\nforall x (Silver(x, christ) -> Silver(christ, margo))\n\nSilver(margo, margo)\n\nSilver(margo, margo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The elana does not chase the murray. The elana is ductile. The elana is etiologic. The elana is wedged. The elana does not see the murray. The dyane puddle the elana. The dyane puddle the murray. The dyane is wedged. The dyane suffix the elana. The murray puddle the elana. The murray does not chase the dyane. The murray is elfish. The murray is arabic. The murray suffix the dyane. The murray dislike the elana. If something dislike the murray then the murray dislike the dyane. If something puddle the elana and it suffix the dyane then the elana dislike the dyane. If the murray suffix the dyane and the murray is elfish then the dyane dislike the murray. If the murray suffix the elana then the elana is elfish. If something suffix the murray then it dislike the murray. If something dislike the elana then it is etiologic. If the murray dislike the dyane then the dyane dislike the elana. If something suffix the murray then the murray suffix the elana. The murray does not chase the murray.", "logic": "\nnot Puddle(elana, murray)\nDuctile(elana)\nEtiologic(elana)\nWedged(elana)\nnot Dislike(elana, murray)\nPuddle(dyane, elana)\nPuddle(dyane, murray)\nWedged(dyane)\nSuffix(dyane, elana)\nPuddle(murray, elana)\nnot Puddle(murray, dyane)\nElfish(murray)\nArabic(murray)\nSuffix(murray, dyane)\nDislike(murray, elana)\nforall x (Dislike(x, murray) -> Dislike(murray, dyane))\nforall x (Puddle(x, elana) and Suffix(x, dyane) -> Dislike(elana, dyane))\nSuffix(murray, dyane) and Elfish(murray) -> Dislike(dyane, murray)\nSuffix(murray, elana) -> Elfish(elana)\nforall x (Suffix(x, murray) -> Dislike(x, murray))\nforall x (Dislike(x, elana) -> Etiologic(x))\nDislike(murray, dyane) -> Dislike(dyane, elana)\nforall x (Suffix(x, murray) -> Suffix(murray, elana))\n\nnot Puddle(murray, murray)\n\nnot Puddle(murray, murray) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The melissa does not chase the cher. The melissa is hooved. The melissa is compact. The melissa is footsure. The melissa does not see the cher. The lanita abscond the melissa. The lanita abscond the cher. The lanita is footsure. The lanita blacken the melissa. The cher abscond the melissa. The cher does not chase the lanita. The cher is revolting. The cher is ergodic. The cher blacken the lanita. The cher articulate the melissa. If something articulate the cher then the cher articulate the lanita. If something abscond the melissa and it blacken the lanita then the melissa articulate the lanita. If the cher blacken the lanita and the cher is revolting then the lanita articulate the cher. If the cher blacken the melissa then the melissa is revolting. If something blacken the cher then it articulate the cher. If something articulate the melissa then it is compact. If the cher articulate the lanita then the lanita articulate the melissa. If something blacken the cher then the cher blacken the melissa. The lanita articulate the lanita.", "logic": "\nnot Abscond(melissa, cher)\nHooved(melissa)\nCompact(melissa)\nFootsure(melissa)\nnot Articulate(melissa, cher)\nAbscond(lanita, melissa)\nAbscond(lanita, cher)\nFootsure(lanita)\nBlacken(lanita, melissa)\nAbscond(cher, melissa)\nnot Abscond(cher, lanita)\nRevolting(cher)\nErgodic(cher)\nBlacken(cher, lanita)\nArticulate(cher, melissa)\nforall x (Articulate(x, cher) -> Articulate(cher, lanita))\nforall x (Abscond(x, melissa) and Blacken(x, lanita) -> Articulate(melissa, lanita))\nBlacken(cher, lanita) and Revolting(cher) -> Articulate(lanita, cher)\nBlacken(cher, melissa) -> Revolting(melissa)\nforall x (Blacken(x, cher) -> Articulate(x, cher))\nforall x (Articulate(x, melissa) -> Compact(x))\nArticulate(cher, lanita) -> Articulate(lanita, melissa)\nforall x (Blacken(x, cher) -> Blacken(cher, melissa))\n\nArticulate(lanita, lanita)\n\nArticulate(lanita, lanita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1470"} {"premises": "The dorie is ninth. The dorie is tiny. The dorie is nonviscid. The dorie is spiffing. The dorie is downscale. If the dorie is not nonviscid then the dorie is tiny. The dorie is spiffing.", "logic": "\nNinth(dorie)\nTiny(dorie)\nNonviscid(dorie)\nSpiffing(dorie)\nDownscale(dorie)\nnot Nonviscid(dorie) -> Tiny(dorie)\n\nSpiffing(dorie)\n\ntherefore Spiffing(dorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5647"} {"premises": "The netti is cotyloidal. The netti is homicidal. The netti is deserted. The netti is faceless. The netti is straight. If the netti is not deserted then the netti is homicidal. The netti is not deserted.", "logic": "\nCotyloidal(netti)\nHomicidal(netti)\nDeserted(netti)\nFaceless(netti)\nStraight(netti)\nnot Deserted(netti) -> Homicidal(netti)\n\nnot Deserted(netti)\n\ntherefore Deserted(netti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5647"} {"premises": "The melody is allophonic. The melody is horrifying. The melody is unbarreled. The melody is soggy. The melody is goddam. If the melody is not unbarreled then the melody is horrifying. The melody does not like the melody.", "logic": "\nAllophonic(melody)\nHorrifying(melody)\nUnbarreled(melody)\nSoggy(melody)\nGoddam(melody)\nnot Unbarreled(melody) -> Horrifying(melody)\n\nnot Likes(melody, melody)\n\nnot Likes(melody, melody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5647"} {"premises": "The christina is midget. The christina is infected. The christina is trenchant. The christina is seventeen. The christina is unstrung. If the christina is not trenchant then the christina is infected. The christina eats the christina.", "logic": "\nMidget(christina)\nInfected(christina)\nTrenchant(christina)\nSeventeen(christina)\nUnstrung(christina)\nnot Trenchant(christina) -> Infected(christina)\n\nEats(christina, christina)\n\nEats(christina, christina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5647"} {"premises": "The dorita burgle the rozanne. The rozanne devoice the adel. The adel crape the rozanne. If someone crape the rozanne then they eat the dorita. If someone crape the dorita then the dorita burgle the adel. If someone is anasarcous and they like the adel then they are admirable. If someone is anasarcous and tined then they eat the rozanne. If someone devoice the dorita then the dorita crape the rozanne. If someone devoice the adel then they are admirable. The rozanne devoice the adel.", "logic": "\nBurgle(dorita, rozanne)\nDevoice(rozanne, adel)\nCrape(adel, rozanne)\nforall x (Crape(x, rozanne) -> Devoice(x, dorita))\nforall x (Crape(x, dorita) -> Burgle(dorita, adel))\nforall x (Anasarcous(x) and Crape(x, adel) -> Admirable(x))\nforall x (Anasarcous(x) and Tined(x) -> Devoice(x, rozanne))\nforall x (Devoice(x, dorita) -> Crape(dorita, rozanne))\nforall x (Devoice(x, adel) -> Admirable(x))\n\nDevoice(rozanne, adel)\n\ntherefore Devoice(rozanne, adel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The crissy cheerlead the torey. The torey authorise the wash. The wash nick the torey. If someone nick the torey then they eat the crissy. If someone nick the crissy then the crissy cheerlead the wash. If someone is reputable and they like the wash then they are semipublic. If someone is reputable and melodic then they eat the torey. If someone authorise the crissy then the crissy nick the torey. If someone authorise the wash then they are semipublic. The torey does not eat the wash.", "logic": "\nCheerlead(crissy, torey)\nAuthorise(torey, wash)\nNick(wash, torey)\nforall x (Nick(x, torey) -> Authorise(x, crissy))\nforall x (Nick(x, crissy) -> Cheerlead(crissy, wash))\nforall x (Reputable(x) and Nick(x, wash) -> Semipublic(x))\nforall x (Reputable(x) and Melodic(x) -> Authorise(x, torey))\nforall x (Authorise(x, crissy) -> Nick(crissy, torey))\nforall x (Authorise(x, wash) -> Semipublic(x))\n\nnot Authorise(torey, wash)\n\ntherefore Authorise(torey, wash)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The jen dissertate the george. The george decolour the glenn. The glenn monopolise the george. If someone monopolise the george then they eat the jen. If someone monopolise the jen then the jen dissertate the glenn. If someone is indentured and they like the glenn then they are tenebrous. If someone is indentured and sainted then they eat the george. If someone decolour the jen then the jen monopolise the george. If someone decolour the glenn then they are tenebrous. The glenn decolour the jen.", "logic": "\nDissertate(jen, george)\nDecolour(george, glenn)\nMonopolise(glenn, george)\nforall x (Monopolise(x, george) -> Decolour(x, jen))\nforall x (Monopolise(x, jen) -> Dissertate(jen, glenn))\nforall x (Indentured(x) and Monopolise(x, glenn) -> Tenebrous(x))\nforall x (Indentured(x) and Sainted(x) -> Decolour(x, george))\nforall x (Decolour(x, jen) -> Monopolise(jen, george))\nforall x (Decolour(x, glenn) -> Tenebrous(x))\n\nDecolour(glenn, jen)\n\nMonopolise(glenn, george) and forall x (Monopolise(x, george) -> Decolour(x, jen)) -> therefore Decolour(glenn, jen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The eleni waste the blayne. The blayne bituminize the dan. The dan weed the blayne. If someone weed the blayne then they eat the eleni. If someone weed the eleni then the eleni waste the dan. If someone is famed and they like the dan then they are cherry. If someone is famed and acerb then they eat the blayne. If someone bituminize the eleni then the eleni weed the blayne. If someone bituminize the dan then they are cherry. The dan does not eat the eleni.", "logic": "\nWaste(eleni, blayne)\nBituminize(blayne, dan)\nWeed(dan, blayne)\nforall x (Weed(x, blayne) -> Bituminize(x, eleni))\nforall x (Weed(x, eleni) -> Waste(eleni, dan))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Weed(x, dan) -> Cherry(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Acerb(x) -> Bituminize(x, blayne))\nforall x (Bituminize(x, eleni) -> Weed(eleni, blayne))\nforall x (Bituminize(x, dan) -> Cherry(x))\n\nnot Bituminize(dan, eleni)\n\nWeed(dan, blayne) and forall x (Weed(x, blayne) -> Bituminize(x, eleni)) -> therefore Bituminize(dan, eleni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The ramon emphasise the dido. The dido concentre the geoffry. The geoffry talc the dido. If someone talc the dido then they eat the ramon. If someone talc the ramon then the ramon emphasise the geoffry. If someone is decreasing and they like the geoffry then they are damn. If someone is decreasing and hybrid then they eat the dido. If someone concentre the ramon then the ramon talc the dido. If someone concentre the geoffry then they are damn. The ramon talc the dido.", "logic": "\nEmphasise(ramon, dido)\nConcentre(dido, geoffry)\nTalc(geoffry, dido)\nforall x (Talc(x, dido) -> Concentre(x, ramon))\nforall x (Talc(x, ramon) -> Emphasise(ramon, geoffry))\nforall x (Decreasing(x) and Talc(x, geoffry) -> Damn(x))\nforall x (Decreasing(x) and Hybrid(x) -> Concentre(x, dido))\nforall x (Concentre(x, ramon) -> Talc(ramon, dido))\nforall x (Concentre(x, geoffry) -> Damn(x))\n\nTalc(ramon, dido)\n\nTalc(geoffry, dido) and forall x (Talc(x, dido) -> Concentre(x, ramon)) -> therefore Concentre(geoffry, ramon) Concentre(geoffry, ramon) and forall x (Concentre(x, ramon) -> Talc(ramon, dido)) -> therefore Talc(ramon, dido)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The norean oversee the thurston. The thurston limn the joletta. The joletta sidestep the thurston. If someone sidestep the thurston then they eat the norean. If someone sidestep the norean then the norean oversee the joletta. If someone is asat and they like the joletta then they are buttressed. If someone is asat and bulimic then they eat the thurston. If someone limn the norean then the norean sidestep the thurston. If someone limn the joletta then they are buttressed. The norean does not like the thurston.", "logic": "\nOversee(norean, thurston)\nLimn(thurston, joletta)\nSidestep(joletta, thurston)\nforall x (Sidestep(x, thurston) -> Limn(x, norean))\nforall x (Sidestep(x, norean) -> Oversee(norean, joletta))\nforall x (Asat(x) and Sidestep(x, joletta) -> Buttressed(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) and Bulimic(x) -> Limn(x, thurston))\nforall x (Limn(x, norean) -> Sidestep(norean, thurston))\nforall x (Limn(x, joletta) -> Buttressed(x))\n\nnot Sidestep(norean, thurston)\n\nSidestep(joletta, thurston) and forall x (Sidestep(x, thurston) -> Limn(x, norean)) -> therefore Limn(joletta, norean) Limn(joletta, norean) and forall x (Limn(x, norean) -> Sidestep(norean, thurston)) -> therefore Sidestep(norean, thurston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The heddie bevel the lettie. The lettie stigmatise the roxi. The roxi obligate the lettie. If someone obligate the lettie then they eat the heddie. If someone obligate the heddie then the heddie bevel the roxi. If someone is cruciform and they like the roxi then they are dendroid. If someone is cruciform and befouled then they eat the lettie. If someone stigmatise the heddie then the heddie obligate the lettie. If someone stigmatise the roxi then they are dendroid. The heddie stigmatise the heddie.", "logic": "\nBevel(heddie, lettie)\nStigmatise(lettie, roxi)\nObligate(roxi, lettie)\nforall x (Obligate(x, lettie) -> Stigmatise(x, heddie))\nforall x (Obligate(x, heddie) -> Bevel(heddie, roxi))\nforall x (Cruciform(x) and Obligate(x, roxi) -> Dendroid(x))\nforall x (Cruciform(x) and Befouled(x) -> Stigmatise(x, lettie))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, heddie) -> Obligate(heddie, lettie))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, roxi) -> Dendroid(x))\n\nStigmatise(heddie, heddie)\n\nObligate(roxi, lettie) and forall x (Obligate(x, lettie) -> Stigmatise(x, heddie)) -> therefore Stigmatise(roxi, heddie) Stigmatise(roxi, heddie) and forall x (Stigmatise(x, heddie) -> Obligate(heddie, lettie)) -> therefore Obligate(heddie, lettie) Obligate(heddie, lettie) and forall x (Obligate(x, lettie) -> Stigmatise(x, heddie)) -> therefore Stigmatise(heddie, heddie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The bird cuckoo the jill. The jill uncross the wilie. The wilie judge the jill. If someone judge the jill then they eat the bird. If someone judge the bird then the bird cuckoo the wilie. If someone is fond and they like the wilie then they are centroidal. If someone is fond and midmost then they eat the jill. If someone uncross the bird then the bird judge the jill. If someone uncross the wilie then they are centroidal. The bird does not eat the bird.", "logic": "\nCuckoo(bird, jill)\nUncross(jill, wilie)\nJudge(wilie, jill)\nforall x (Judge(x, jill) -> Uncross(x, bird))\nforall x (Judge(x, bird) -> Cuckoo(bird, wilie))\nforall x (Fond(x) and Judge(x, wilie) -> Centroidal(x))\nforall x (Fond(x) and Midmost(x) -> Uncross(x, jill))\nforall x (Uncross(x, bird) -> Judge(bird, jill))\nforall x (Uncross(x, wilie) -> Centroidal(x))\n\nnot Uncross(bird, bird)\n\nJudge(wilie, jill) and forall x (Judge(x, jill) -> Uncross(x, bird)) -> therefore Uncross(wilie, bird) Uncross(wilie, bird) and forall x (Uncross(x, bird) -> Judge(bird, jill)) -> therefore Judge(bird, jill) Judge(bird, jill) and forall x (Judge(x, jill) -> Uncross(x, bird)) -> therefore Uncross(bird, bird)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The esta release the nena. The nena gnaw the aleen. The aleen implore the nena. If someone implore the nena then they eat the esta. If someone implore the esta then the esta release the aleen. If someone is cuban and they like the aleen then they are bursiform. If someone is cuban and powered then they eat the nena. If someone gnaw the esta then the esta implore the nena. If someone gnaw the aleen then they are bursiform. The esta does not eat the nena.", "logic": "\nRelease(esta, nena)\nGnaw(nena, aleen)\nImplore(aleen, nena)\nforall x (Implore(x, nena) -> Gnaw(x, esta))\nforall x (Implore(x, esta) -> Release(esta, aleen))\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Implore(x, aleen) -> Bursiform(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Powered(x) -> Gnaw(x, nena))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, esta) -> Implore(esta, nena))\nforall x (Gnaw(x, aleen) -> Bursiform(x))\n\nnot Gnaw(esta, nena)\n\nforall x (Cuban(x) and Powered(x) -> Gnaw(x, nena)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The russell adjure the grissel. The grissel bruise the berget. The berget telefax the grissel. If someone telefax the grissel then they eat the russell. If someone telefax the russell then the russell adjure the berget. If someone is neuromotor and they like the berget then they are bizonal. If someone is neuromotor and strep then they eat the grissel. If someone bruise the russell then the russell telefax the grissel. If someone bruise the berget then they are bizonal. The berget is bizonal.", "logic": "\nAdjure(russell, grissel)\nBruise(grissel, berget)\nTelefax(berget, grissel)\nforall x (Telefax(x, grissel) -> Bruise(x, russell))\nforall x (Telefax(x, russell) -> Adjure(russell, berget))\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) and Telefax(x, berget) -> Bizonal(x))\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) and Strep(x) -> Bruise(x, grissel))\nforall x (Bruise(x, russell) -> Telefax(russell, grissel))\nforall x (Bruise(x, berget) -> Bizonal(x))\n\nBizonal(berget)\n\nforall x (Neuromotor(x) and Telefax(x, berget) -> Bizonal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The nariko syndicate the lynnea. The lynnea mismatch the sascha. The sascha beach the lynnea. If someone beach the lynnea then they eat the nariko. If someone beach the nariko then the nariko syndicate the sascha. If someone is hindoo and they like the sascha then they are marly. If someone is hindoo and crescendo then they eat the lynnea. If someone mismatch the nariko then the nariko beach the lynnea. If someone mismatch the sascha then they are marly. The lynnea does not eat the nariko.", "logic": "\nSyndicate(nariko, lynnea)\nMismatch(lynnea, sascha)\nBeach(sascha, lynnea)\nforall x (Beach(x, lynnea) -> Mismatch(x, nariko))\nforall x (Beach(x, nariko) -> Syndicate(nariko, sascha))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) and Beach(x, sascha) -> Marly(x))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) and Crescendo(x) -> Mismatch(x, lynnea))\nforall x (Mismatch(x, nariko) -> Beach(nariko, lynnea))\nforall x (Mismatch(x, sascha) -> Marly(x))\n\nnot Mismatch(lynnea, nariko)\n\nforall x (Beach(x, lynnea) -> Mismatch(x, nariko)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The jandy sashay the hugh. The hugh sublet the valenka. The valenka burglarise the hugh. If someone burglarise the hugh then they eat the jandy. If someone burglarise the jandy then the jandy sashay the valenka. If someone is omnivorous and they like the valenka then they are spiraling. If someone is omnivorous and seaworthy then they eat the hugh. If someone sublet the jandy then the jandy burglarise the hugh. If someone sublet the valenka then they are spiraling. The jandy is spiraling.", "logic": "\nSashay(jandy, hugh)\nSublet(hugh, valenka)\nBurglarise(valenka, hugh)\nforall x (Burglarise(x, hugh) -> Sublet(x, jandy))\nforall x (Burglarise(x, jandy) -> Sashay(jandy, valenka))\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) and Burglarise(x, valenka) -> Spiraling(x))\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) and Seaworthy(x) -> Sublet(x, hugh))\nforall x (Sublet(x, jandy) -> Burglarise(jandy, hugh))\nforall x (Sublet(x, valenka) -> Spiraling(x))\n\nSpiraling(jandy)\n\nforall x (Omnivorous(x) and Burglarise(x, valenka) -> Spiraling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The fyodor alkalise the portia. The portia dateline the natalina. The natalina refocus the portia. If someone refocus the portia then they eat the fyodor. If someone refocus the fyodor then the fyodor alkalise the natalina. If someone is drear and they like the natalina then they are unexpected. If someone is drear and comradely then they eat the portia. If someone dateline the fyodor then the fyodor refocus the portia. If someone dateline the natalina then they are unexpected. The portia does not like the portia.", "logic": "\nAlkalise(fyodor, portia)\nDateline(portia, natalina)\nRefocus(natalina, portia)\nforall x (Refocus(x, portia) -> Dateline(x, fyodor))\nforall x (Refocus(x, fyodor) -> Alkalise(fyodor, natalina))\nforall x (Drear(x) and Refocus(x, natalina) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Drear(x) and Comradely(x) -> Dateline(x, portia))\nforall x (Dateline(x, fyodor) -> Refocus(fyodor, portia))\nforall x (Dateline(x, natalina) -> Unexpected(x))\n\nnot Refocus(portia, portia)\n\nnot Refocus(portia, portia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The rubetta retire the rab. The rab bottom the ethelind. The ethelind muddy the rab. If someone muddy the rab then they eat the rubetta. If someone muddy the rubetta then the rubetta retire the ethelind. If someone is wild and they like the ethelind then they are self. If someone is wild and inerrable then they eat the rab. If someone bottom the rubetta then the rubetta muddy the rab. If someone bottom the ethelind then they are self. The ethelind muddy the rubetta.", "logic": "\nRetire(rubetta, rab)\nBottom(rab, ethelind)\nMuddy(ethelind, rab)\nforall x (Muddy(x, rab) -> Bottom(x, rubetta))\nforall x (Muddy(x, rubetta) -> Retire(rubetta, ethelind))\nforall x (Wild(x) and Muddy(x, ethelind) -> Self(x))\nforall x (Wild(x) and Inerrable(x) -> Bottom(x, rab))\nforall x (Bottom(x, rubetta) -> Muddy(rubetta, rab))\nforall x (Bottom(x, ethelind) -> Self(x))\n\nMuddy(ethelind, rubetta)\n\nMuddy(ethelind, rubetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The gibb revel the yevette. The yevette birdie the franz. The franz contribute the yevette. If someone contribute the yevette then they eat the gibb. If someone contribute the gibb then the gibb revel the franz. If someone is sidereal and they like the franz then they are abstemious. If someone is sidereal and thin then they eat the yevette. If someone birdie the gibb then the gibb contribute the yevette. If someone birdie the franz then they are abstemious. The yevette does not like the franz.", "logic": "\nRevel(gibb, yevette)\nBirdie(yevette, franz)\nContribute(franz, yevette)\nforall x (Contribute(x, yevette) -> Birdie(x, gibb))\nforall x (Contribute(x, gibb) -> Revel(gibb, franz))\nforall x (Sidereal(x) and Contribute(x, franz) -> Abstemious(x))\nforall x (Sidereal(x) and Thin(x) -> Birdie(x, yevette))\nforall x (Birdie(x, gibb) -> Contribute(gibb, yevette))\nforall x (Birdie(x, franz) -> Abstemious(x))\n\nnot Contribute(yevette, franz)\n\nnot Contribute(yevette, franz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "The raye untwist the cherey. The cherey outpace the sondra. The sondra guillotine the cherey. If someone guillotine the cherey then they eat the raye. If someone guillotine the raye then the raye untwist the sondra. If someone is dear and they like the sondra then they are unexampled. If someone is dear and selective then they eat the cherey. If someone outpace the raye then the raye guillotine the cherey. If someone outpace the sondra then they are unexampled. The raye is blue.", "logic": "\nUntwist(raye, cherey)\nOutpace(cherey, sondra)\nGuillotine(sondra, cherey)\nforall x (Guillotine(x, cherey) -> Outpace(x, raye))\nforall x (Guillotine(x, raye) -> Untwist(raye, sondra))\nforall x (Dear(x) and Guillotine(x, sondra) -> Unexampled(x))\nforall x (Dear(x) and Selective(x) -> Outpace(x, cherey))\nforall x (Outpace(x, raye) -> Guillotine(raye, cherey))\nforall x (Outpace(x, sondra) -> Unexampled(x))\n\nBlue(raye)\n\nBlue(raye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1050"} {"premises": "Justina is narrow. Justina is scalloped. Justina is eremitic. Justina is asymmetric. Justina is ebracteate. Justina is canary. Zacharie is narrow. Zacharie is ebracteate. Zacharie is canary. Arabele is asymmetric. Arabele is canary. Schuyler is narrow. Schuyler is eremitic. Schuyler is asymmetric. Schuyler is canary. If Zacharie is narrow and Zacharie is ebracteate then Zacharie is susurrant. If Zacharie is narrow and Zacharie is susurrant then Zacharie is scalloped. Green, canary people are asymmetric. Justina is ebracteate.", "logic": "\nNarrow(justina)\nScalloped(justina)\nEremitic(justina)\nAsymmetric(justina)\nEbracteate(justina)\nCanary(justina)\nNarrow(zacharie)\nEbracteate(zacharie)\nCanary(zacharie)\nAsymmetric(arabele)\nCanary(arabele)\nNarrow(schuyler)\nEremitic(schuyler)\nAsymmetric(schuyler)\nCanary(schuyler)\nNarrow(zacharie) and Ebracteate(zacharie) -> Susurrant(zacharie)\nNarrow(zacharie) and Susurrant(zacharie) -> Scalloped(zacharie)\nforall x (Scalloped(x) and Canary(x) -> Asymmetric(x))\n\nEbracteate(justina)\n\ntherefore Ebracteate(justina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Gladys is telescopic. Gladys is peremptory. Gladys is balmy. Gladys is devilish. Gladys is galore. Gladys is deweyan. Angela is telescopic. Angela is galore. Angela is deweyan. Raymond is devilish. Raymond is deweyan. Faith is telescopic. Faith is balmy. Faith is devilish. Faith is deweyan. If Angela is telescopic and Angela is galore then Angela is nonpareil. If Angela is telescopic and Angela is nonpareil then Angela is peremptory. Green, deweyan people are devilish. Gladys is not balmy.", "logic": "\nTelescopic(gladys)\nPeremptory(gladys)\nBalmy(gladys)\nDevilish(gladys)\nGalore(gladys)\nDeweyan(gladys)\nTelescopic(angela)\nGalore(angela)\nDeweyan(angela)\nDevilish(raymond)\nDeweyan(raymond)\nTelescopic(faith)\nBalmy(faith)\nDevilish(faith)\nDeweyan(faith)\nTelescopic(angela) and Galore(angela) -> Nonpareil(angela)\nTelescopic(angela) and Nonpareil(angela) -> Peremptory(angela)\nforall x (Peremptory(x) and Deweyan(x) -> Devilish(x))\n\nnot Balmy(gladys)\n\ntherefore Balmy(gladys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Karina is honduran. Karina is uncensored. Karina is unvaried. Karina is jazzy. Karina is faltering. Karina is zippy. Cassi is honduran. Cassi is faltering. Cassi is zippy. Laurie is jazzy. Laurie is zippy. Holley is honduran. Holley is unvaried. Holley is jazzy. Holley is zippy. If Cassi is honduran and Cassi is faltering then Cassi is mechanised. If Cassi is honduran and Cassi is mechanised then Cassi is uncensored. Green, zippy people are jazzy. Cassi is mechanised.", "logic": "\nHonduran(karina)\nUncensored(karina)\nUnvaried(karina)\nJazzy(karina)\nFaltering(karina)\nZippy(karina)\nHonduran(cassi)\nFaltering(cassi)\nZippy(cassi)\nJazzy(laurie)\nZippy(laurie)\nHonduran(holley)\nUnvaried(holley)\nJazzy(holley)\nZippy(holley)\nHonduran(cassi) and Faltering(cassi) -> Mechanised(cassi)\nHonduran(cassi) and Mechanised(cassi) -> Uncensored(cassi)\nforall x (Uncensored(x) and Zippy(x) -> Jazzy(x))\n\nMechanised(cassi)\n\nHonduran(cassi) and Faltering(cassi) and Honduran(cassi) and Faltering(cassi) -> Mechanised(cassi) -> therefore Mechanised(cassi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Brandice is hyaline. Brandice is insincere. Brandice is creaseless. Brandice is tomboyish. Brandice is assiduous. Brandice is sleek. Lesli is hyaline. Lesli is assiduous. Lesli is sleek. Parker is tomboyish. Parker is sleek. Karry is hyaline. Karry is creaseless. Karry is tomboyish. Karry is sleek. If Lesli is hyaline and Lesli is assiduous then Lesli is alluring. If Lesli is hyaline and Lesli is alluring then Lesli is insincere. Green, sleek people are tomboyish. Lesli is not alluring.", "logic": "\nHyaline(brandice)\nInsincere(brandice)\nCreaseless(brandice)\nTomboyish(brandice)\nAssiduous(brandice)\nSleek(brandice)\nHyaline(lesli)\nAssiduous(lesli)\nSleek(lesli)\nTomboyish(parker)\nSleek(parker)\nHyaline(karry)\nCreaseless(karry)\nTomboyish(karry)\nSleek(karry)\nHyaline(lesli) and Assiduous(lesli) -> Alluring(lesli)\nHyaline(lesli) and Alluring(lesli) -> Insincere(lesli)\nforall x (Insincere(x) and Sleek(x) -> Tomboyish(x))\n\nnot Alluring(lesli)\n\nHyaline(lesli) and Assiduous(lesli) and Hyaline(lesli) and Assiduous(lesli) -> Alluring(lesli) -> therefore Alluring(lesli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Octavia is chilling. Octavia is terminated. Octavia is genial. Octavia is unaffected. Octavia is shaken. Octavia is rude. Louis is chilling. Louis is shaken. Louis is rude. Tiff is unaffected. Tiff is rude. Sallie is chilling. Sallie is genial. Sallie is unaffected. Sallie is rude. If Louis is chilling and Louis is shaken then Louis is vagile. If Louis is chilling and Louis is vagile then Louis is terminated. Green, rude people are unaffected. Louis is terminated.", "logic": "\nChilling(octavia)\nTerminated(octavia)\nGenial(octavia)\nUnaffected(octavia)\nShaken(octavia)\nRude(octavia)\nChilling(louis)\nShaken(louis)\nRude(louis)\nUnaffected(tiff)\nRude(tiff)\nChilling(sallie)\nGenial(sallie)\nUnaffected(sallie)\nRude(sallie)\nChilling(louis) and Shaken(louis) -> Vagile(louis)\nChilling(louis) and Vagile(louis) -> Terminated(louis)\nforall x (Terminated(x) and Rude(x) -> Unaffected(x))\n\nTerminated(louis)\n\nChilling(louis) and Shaken(louis) and Chilling(louis) and Shaken(louis) -> Vagile(louis) -> therefore Vagile(louis) Chilling(louis) and Vagile(louis) and Chilling(louis) and Vagile(louis) -> Terminated(louis) -> therefore Terminated(louis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Joel is sounding. Joel is nett. Joel is venal. Joel is stalwart. Joel is unparented. Joel is lenient. Curtice is sounding. Curtice is unparented. Curtice is lenient. Adriane is stalwart. Adriane is lenient. Curtice is sounding. Curtice is venal. Curtice is stalwart. Curtice is lenient. If Curtice is sounding and Curtice is unparented then Curtice is toiling. If Curtice is sounding and Curtice is toiling then Curtice is nett. Green, lenient people are stalwart. Curtice is not nett.", "logic": "\nSounding(joel)\nNett(joel)\nVenal(joel)\nStalwart(joel)\nUnparented(joel)\nLenient(joel)\nSounding(curtice)\nUnparented(curtice)\nLenient(curtice)\nStalwart(adriane)\nLenient(adriane)\nSounding(curtice)\nVenal(curtice)\nStalwart(curtice)\nLenient(curtice)\nSounding(curtice) and Unparented(curtice) -> Toiling(curtice)\nSounding(curtice) and Toiling(curtice) -> Nett(curtice)\nforall x (Nett(x) and Lenient(x) -> Stalwart(x))\n\nnot Nett(curtice)\n\nSounding(curtice) and Unparented(curtice) and Sounding(curtice) and Unparented(curtice) -> Toiling(curtice) -> therefore Toiling(curtice) Sounding(curtice) and Toiling(curtice) and Sounding(curtice) and Toiling(curtice) -> Nett(curtice) -> therefore Nett(curtice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Charline is wroth. Charline is stylish. Charline is caespitose. Charline is creditable. Charline is hominid. Charline is postexilic. Bonni is wroth. Bonni is hominid. Bonni is postexilic. Sibella is creditable. Sibella is postexilic. Irvine is wroth. Irvine is caespitose. Irvine is creditable. Irvine is postexilic. If Bonni is wroth and Bonni is hominid then Bonni is somber. If Bonni is wroth and Bonni is somber then Bonni is stylish. Green, postexilic people are creditable. Bonni is creditable.", "logic": "\nWroth(charline)\nStylish(charline)\nCaespitose(charline)\nCreditable(charline)\nHominid(charline)\nPostexilic(charline)\nWroth(bonni)\nHominid(bonni)\nPostexilic(bonni)\nCreditable(sibella)\nPostexilic(sibella)\nWroth(irvine)\nCaespitose(irvine)\nCreditable(irvine)\nPostexilic(irvine)\nWroth(bonni) and Hominid(bonni) -> Somber(bonni)\nWroth(bonni) and Somber(bonni) -> Stylish(bonni)\nforall x (Stylish(x) and Postexilic(x) -> Creditable(x))\n\nCreditable(bonni)\n\nWroth(bonni) and Hominid(bonni) and Wroth(bonni) and Hominid(bonni) -> Somber(bonni) -> therefore Somber(bonni) Wroth(bonni) and Somber(bonni) and Wroth(bonni) and Somber(bonni) -> Stylish(bonni) -> therefore Stylish(bonni) Stylish(bonni) and Postexilic(bonni) and forall x (Stylish(x) and Postexilic(x) -> Creditable(x)) -> therefore Creditable(bonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Ivan is ninth. Ivan is andantino. Ivan is metallic. Ivan is unavowed. Ivan is cephalic. Ivan is curtal. Lethia is ninth. Lethia is cephalic. Lethia is curtal. Ealasaid is unavowed. Ealasaid is curtal. Abby is ninth. Abby is metallic. Abby is unavowed. Abby is curtal. If Lethia is ninth and Lethia is cephalic then Lethia is euphonic. If Lethia is ninth and Lethia is euphonic then Lethia is andantino. Green, curtal people are unavowed. Lethia is not unavowed.", "logic": "\nNinth(ivan)\nAndantino(ivan)\nMetallic(ivan)\nUnavowed(ivan)\nCephalic(ivan)\nCurtal(ivan)\nNinth(lethia)\nCephalic(lethia)\nCurtal(lethia)\nUnavowed(ealasaid)\nCurtal(ealasaid)\nNinth(abby)\nMetallic(abby)\nUnavowed(abby)\nCurtal(abby)\nNinth(lethia) and Cephalic(lethia) -> Euphonic(lethia)\nNinth(lethia) and Euphonic(lethia) -> Andantino(lethia)\nforall x (Andantino(x) and Curtal(x) -> Unavowed(x))\n\nnot Unavowed(lethia)\n\nNinth(lethia) and Cephalic(lethia) and Ninth(lethia) and Cephalic(lethia) -> Euphonic(lethia) -> therefore Euphonic(lethia) Ninth(lethia) and Euphonic(lethia) and Ninth(lethia) and Euphonic(lethia) -> Andantino(lethia) -> therefore Andantino(lethia) Andantino(lethia) and Curtal(lethia) and forall x (Andantino(x) and Curtal(x) -> Unavowed(x)) -> therefore Unavowed(lethia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Gianna is aerated. Gianna is pubertal. Gianna is hedonistic. Gianna is jellylike. Gianna is subdued. Gianna is studied. Zorina is aerated. Zorina is subdued. Zorina is studied. Neile is jellylike. Neile is studied. Gordon is aerated. Gordon is hedonistic. Gordon is jellylike. Gordon is studied. If Zorina is aerated and Zorina is subdued then Zorina is javanese. If Zorina is aerated and Zorina is javanese then Zorina is pubertal. Green, studied people are jellylike. Gianna is not javanese.", "logic": "\nAerated(gianna)\nPubertal(gianna)\nHedonistic(gianna)\nJellylike(gianna)\nSubdued(gianna)\nStudied(gianna)\nAerated(zorina)\nSubdued(zorina)\nStudied(zorina)\nJellylike(neile)\nStudied(neile)\nAerated(gordon)\nHedonistic(gordon)\nJellylike(gordon)\nStudied(gordon)\nAerated(zorina) and Subdued(zorina) -> Javanese(zorina)\nAerated(zorina) and Javanese(zorina) -> Pubertal(zorina)\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Studied(x) -> Jellylike(x))\n\nnot Javanese(gianna)\n\nnot Javanese(gianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Vincents is aspheric. Vincents is pencilled. Vincents is leftish. Vincents is despairing. Vincents is backswept. Vincents is prudish. Caitlin is aspheric. Caitlin is backswept. Caitlin is prudish. Nessi is despairing. Nessi is prudish. Diamond is aspheric. Diamond is leftish. Diamond is despairing. Diamond is prudish. If Caitlin is aspheric and Caitlin is backswept then Caitlin is forgotten. If Caitlin is aspheric and Caitlin is forgotten then Caitlin is pencilled. Green, prudish people are despairing. Nessi is aspheric.", "logic": "\nAspheric(vincents)\nPencilled(vincents)\nLeftish(vincents)\nDespairing(vincents)\nBackswept(vincents)\nPrudish(vincents)\nAspheric(caitlin)\nBackswept(caitlin)\nPrudish(caitlin)\nDespairing(nessi)\nPrudish(nessi)\nAspheric(diamond)\nLeftish(diamond)\nDespairing(diamond)\nPrudish(diamond)\nAspheric(caitlin) and Backswept(caitlin) -> Forgotten(caitlin)\nAspheric(caitlin) and Forgotten(caitlin) -> Pencilled(caitlin)\nforall x (Pencilled(x) and Prudish(x) -> Despairing(x))\n\nAspheric(nessi)\n\nAspheric(nessi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Milzie is amnesic. Milzie is adust. Milzie is utile. Milzie is alert. Milzie is downstairs. Milzie is mineral. Margaret is amnesic. Margaret is downstairs. Margaret is mineral. Storm is alert. Storm is mineral. Daloris is amnesic. Daloris is utile. Daloris is alert. Daloris is mineral. If Margaret is amnesic and Margaret is downstairs then Margaret is undeterred. If Margaret is amnesic and Margaret is undeterred then Margaret is adust. Green, mineral people are alert. Storm is not downstairs.", "logic": "\nAmnesic(milzie)\nAdust(milzie)\nUtile(milzie)\nAlert(milzie)\nDownstairs(milzie)\nMineral(milzie)\nAmnesic(margaret)\nDownstairs(margaret)\nMineral(margaret)\nAlert(storm)\nMineral(storm)\nAmnesic(daloris)\nUtile(daloris)\nAlert(daloris)\nMineral(daloris)\nAmnesic(margaret) and Downstairs(margaret) -> Undeterred(margaret)\nAmnesic(margaret) and Undeterred(margaret) -> Adust(margaret)\nforall x (Adust(x) and Mineral(x) -> Alert(x))\n\nnot Downstairs(storm)\n\nnot Downstairs(storm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Lucinda is smarmy. Lucinda is bavarian. Lucinda is matured. Lucinda is lithe. Lucinda is taurine. Lucinda is habitual. Beth is smarmy. Beth is taurine. Beth is habitual. Risa is lithe. Risa is habitual. Odilia is smarmy. Odilia is matured. Odilia is lithe. Odilia is habitual. If Beth is smarmy and Beth is taurine then Beth is passive. If Beth is smarmy and Beth is passive then Beth is bavarian. Green, habitual people are lithe. Odilia is taurine.", "logic": "\nSmarmy(lucinda)\nBavarian(lucinda)\nMatured(lucinda)\nLithe(lucinda)\nTaurine(lucinda)\nHabitual(lucinda)\nSmarmy(beth)\nTaurine(beth)\nHabitual(beth)\nLithe(risa)\nHabitual(risa)\nSmarmy(odilia)\nMatured(odilia)\nLithe(odilia)\nHabitual(odilia)\nSmarmy(beth) and Taurine(beth) -> Passive(beth)\nSmarmy(beth) and Passive(beth) -> Bavarian(beth)\nforall x (Bavarian(x) and Habitual(x) -> Lithe(x))\n\nTaurine(odilia)\n\nTaurine(odilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Mort is appositive. Mort is topping. Mort is pastoral. Mort is guyanese. Mort is symbolical. Mort is frilled. Stanfield is appositive. Stanfield is symbolical. Stanfield is frilled. Leah is guyanese. Leah is frilled. Lorianne is appositive. Lorianne is pastoral. Lorianne is guyanese. Lorianne is frilled. If Stanfield is appositive and Stanfield is symbolical then Stanfield is ovoid. If Stanfield is appositive and Stanfield is ovoid then Stanfield is topping. Green, frilled people are guyanese. Lorianne is not ovoid.", "logic": "\nAppositive(mort)\nTopping(mort)\nPastoral(mort)\nGuyanese(mort)\nSymbolical(mort)\nFrilled(mort)\nAppositive(stanfield)\nSymbolical(stanfield)\nFrilled(stanfield)\nGuyanese(leah)\nFrilled(leah)\nAppositive(lorianne)\nPastoral(lorianne)\nGuyanese(lorianne)\nFrilled(lorianne)\nAppositive(stanfield) and Symbolical(stanfield) -> Ovoid(stanfield)\nAppositive(stanfield) and Ovoid(stanfield) -> Topping(stanfield)\nforall x (Topping(x) and Frilled(x) -> Guyanese(x))\n\nnot Ovoid(lorianne)\n\nnot Ovoid(lorianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Blinni is turbinate. Blinni is assuasive. Blinni is bighearted. Blinni is irenic. Blinni is fluffy. Blinni is reassuring. Briny is turbinate. Briny is fluffy. Briny is reassuring. Channa is irenic. Channa is reassuring. Marci is turbinate. Marci is bighearted. Marci is irenic. Marci is reassuring. If Briny is turbinate and Briny is fluffy then Briny is antheral. If Briny is turbinate and Briny is antheral then Briny is assuasive. Green, reassuring people are irenic. Channa is bighearted.", "logic": "\nTurbinate(blinni)\nAssuasive(blinni)\nBighearted(blinni)\nIrenic(blinni)\nFluffy(blinni)\nReassuring(blinni)\nTurbinate(briny)\nFluffy(briny)\nReassuring(briny)\nIrenic(channa)\nReassuring(channa)\nTurbinate(marci)\nBighearted(marci)\nIrenic(marci)\nReassuring(marci)\nTurbinate(briny) and Fluffy(briny) -> Antheral(briny)\nTurbinate(briny) and Antheral(briny) -> Assuasive(briny)\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and Reassuring(x) -> Irenic(x))\n\nBighearted(channa)\n\nBighearted(channa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Darlene is unwonted. Darlene is bionomical. Darlene is pelvic. Darlene is jurassic. Darlene is crookback. Darlene is frothing. Chastity is unwonted. Chastity is crookback. Chastity is frothing. Joy is jurassic. Joy is frothing. Gisella is unwonted. Gisella is pelvic. Gisella is jurassic. Gisella is frothing. If Chastity is unwonted and Chastity is crookback then Chastity is ghanian. If Chastity is unwonted and Chastity is ghanian then Chastity is bionomical. Green, frothing people are jurassic. Chastity is not pelvic.", "logic": "\nUnwonted(darlene)\nBionomical(darlene)\nPelvic(darlene)\nJurassic(darlene)\nCrookback(darlene)\nFrothing(darlene)\nUnwonted(chastity)\nCrookback(chastity)\nFrothing(chastity)\nJurassic(joy)\nFrothing(joy)\nUnwonted(gisella)\nPelvic(gisella)\nJurassic(gisella)\nFrothing(gisella)\nUnwonted(chastity) and Crookback(chastity) -> Ghanian(chastity)\nUnwonted(chastity) and Ghanian(chastity) -> Bionomical(chastity)\nforall x (Bionomical(x) and Frothing(x) -> Jurassic(x))\n\nnot Pelvic(chastity)\n\nnot Pelvic(chastity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "Jannel is octangular. Jannel is hyaloid. Jannel is marsupial. Jannel is webby. Jannel is threefold. Jannel is inertial. Xaviera is octangular. Xaviera is threefold. Xaviera is inertial. Raymund is webby. Raymund is inertial. Ivonne is octangular. Ivonne is marsupial. Ivonne is webby. Ivonne is inertial. If Xaviera is octangular and Xaviera is threefold then Xaviera is thenar. If Xaviera is octangular and Xaviera is thenar then Xaviera is hyaloid. Green, inertial people are webby. Ivonne is hyaloid.", "logic": "\nOctangular(jannel)\nHyaloid(jannel)\nMarsupial(jannel)\nWebby(jannel)\nThreefold(jannel)\nInertial(jannel)\nOctangular(xaviera)\nThreefold(xaviera)\nInertial(xaviera)\nWebby(raymund)\nInertial(raymund)\nOctangular(ivonne)\nMarsupial(ivonne)\nWebby(ivonne)\nInertial(ivonne)\nOctangular(xaviera) and Threefold(xaviera) -> Thenar(xaviera)\nOctangular(xaviera) and Thenar(xaviera) -> Hyaloid(xaviera)\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Inertial(x) -> Webby(x))\n\nHyaloid(ivonne)\n\nHyaloid(ivonne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1278"} {"premises": "The elric does not chase the whittaker. The whittaker defoliate the elric. The whittaker damn the elric. If someone storm the whittaker and the whittaker defoliate the elric then the elric storm the whittaker. If someone is sartorial and undeclared then they visit the elric. If someone defoliate the whittaker then the whittaker defoliate the elric. If someone damn the whittaker and they chase the whittaker then the whittaker damn the elric. If someone damn the whittaker then the whittaker is not fathomable. If the whittaker damn the elric then the whittaker storm the elric. If someone damn the whittaker and the whittaker does not chase the elric then the whittaker storm the elric. If someone storm the elric then they like the whittaker. The whittaker damn the elric.", "logic": "\nnot Defoliate(elric, whittaker)\nDefoliate(whittaker, elric)\nDamn(whittaker, elric)\nforall x (Storm(x, whittaker) and Defoliate(whittaker, elric) -> Storm(elric, whittaker))\nforall x (Sartorial(x) and Undeclared(x) -> Storm(x, elric))\nforall x (Defoliate(x, whittaker) -> Defoliate(whittaker, elric))\nforall x (Damn(x, whittaker) and Defoliate(x, whittaker) -> Damn(whittaker, elric))\nforall x (Damn(x, whittaker) -> not Fathomable(whittaker))\nDamn(whittaker, elric) -> Storm(whittaker, elric)\nforall x (Damn(x, whittaker) and not Defoliate(whittaker, elric) -> Storm(whittaker, elric))\nforall x (Storm(x, elric) -> Damn(x, whittaker))\n\nDamn(whittaker, elric)\n\ntherefore Damn(whittaker, elric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The marlie does not chase the enrique. The enrique sequence the marlie. The enrique wiggle the marlie. If someone conflict the enrique and the enrique sequence the marlie then the marlie conflict the enrique. If someone is xerophytic and floaty then they visit the marlie. If someone sequence the enrique then the enrique sequence the marlie. If someone wiggle the enrique and they chase the enrique then the enrique wiggle the marlie. If someone wiggle the enrique then the enrique is not gone. If the enrique wiggle the marlie then the enrique conflict the marlie. If someone wiggle the enrique and the enrique does not chase the marlie then the enrique conflict the marlie. If someone conflict the marlie then they like the enrique. The enrique does not like the marlie.", "logic": "\nnot Sequence(marlie, enrique)\nSequence(enrique, marlie)\nWiggle(enrique, marlie)\nforall x (Conflict(x, enrique) and Sequence(enrique, marlie) -> Conflict(marlie, enrique))\nforall x (Xerophytic(x) and Floaty(x) -> Conflict(x, marlie))\nforall x (Sequence(x, enrique) -> Sequence(enrique, marlie))\nforall x (Wiggle(x, enrique) and Sequence(x, enrique) -> Wiggle(enrique, marlie))\nforall x (Wiggle(x, enrique) -> not Gone(enrique))\nWiggle(enrique, marlie) -> Conflict(enrique, marlie)\nforall x (Wiggle(x, enrique) and not Sequence(enrique, marlie) -> Conflict(enrique, marlie))\nforall x (Conflict(x, marlie) -> Wiggle(x, enrique))\n\nnot Wiggle(enrique, marlie)\n\ntherefore Wiggle(enrique, marlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The carlyn does not chase the bjorn. The bjorn bate the carlyn. The bjorn immure the carlyn. If someone shun the bjorn and the bjorn bate the carlyn then the carlyn shun the bjorn. If someone is tripartite and unvaned then they visit the carlyn. If someone bate the bjorn then the bjorn bate the carlyn. If someone immure the bjorn and they chase the bjorn then the bjorn immure the carlyn. If someone immure the bjorn then the bjorn is not likable. If the bjorn immure the carlyn then the bjorn shun the carlyn. If someone immure the bjorn and the bjorn does not chase the carlyn then the bjorn shun the carlyn. If someone shun the carlyn then they like the bjorn. The bjorn shun the carlyn.", "logic": "\nnot Bate(carlyn, bjorn)\nBate(bjorn, carlyn)\nImmure(bjorn, carlyn)\nforall x (Shun(x, bjorn) and Bate(bjorn, carlyn) -> Shun(carlyn, bjorn))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) and Unvaned(x) -> Shun(x, carlyn))\nforall x (Bate(x, bjorn) -> Bate(bjorn, carlyn))\nforall x (Immure(x, bjorn) and Bate(x, bjorn) -> Immure(bjorn, carlyn))\nforall x (Immure(x, bjorn) -> not Likable(bjorn))\nImmure(bjorn, carlyn) -> Shun(bjorn, carlyn)\nforall x (Immure(x, bjorn) and not Bate(bjorn, carlyn) -> Shun(bjorn, carlyn))\nforall x (Shun(x, carlyn) -> Immure(x, bjorn))\n\nShun(bjorn, carlyn)\n\nImmure(bjorn, carlyn) and Immure(bjorn, carlyn) -> Shun(bjorn, carlyn) -> therefore Shun(bjorn, carlyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The burgess does not chase the melonie. The melonie jest the burgess. The melonie cram the burgess. If someone rival the melonie and the melonie jest the burgess then the burgess rival the melonie. If someone is pink and contrary then they visit the burgess. If someone jest the melonie then the melonie jest the burgess. If someone cram the melonie and they chase the melonie then the melonie cram the burgess. If someone cram the melonie then the melonie is not imbecilic. If the melonie cram the burgess then the melonie rival the burgess. If someone cram the melonie and the melonie does not chase the burgess then the melonie rival the burgess. If someone rival the burgess then they like the melonie. The melonie does not visit the burgess.", "logic": "\nnot Jest(burgess, melonie)\nJest(melonie, burgess)\nCram(melonie, burgess)\nforall x (Rival(x, melonie) and Jest(melonie, burgess) -> Rival(burgess, melonie))\nforall x (Pink(x) and Contrary(x) -> Rival(x, burgess))\nforall x (Jest(x, melonie) -> Jest(melonie, burgess))\nforall x (Cram(x, melonie) and Jest(x, melonie) -> Cram(melonie, burgess))\nforall x (Cram(x, melonie) -> not Imbecilic(melonie))\nCram(melonie, burgess) -> Rival(melonie, burgess)\nforall x (Cram(x, melonie) and not Jest(melonie, burgess) -> Rival(melonie, burgess))\nforall x (Rival(x, burgess) -> Cram(x, melonie))\n\nnot Rival(melonie, burgess)\n\nCram(melonie, burgess) and Cram(melonie, burgess) -> Rival(melonie, burgess) -> therefore Rival(melonie, burgess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The izaak does not chase the tomi. The tomi intertwine the izaak. The tomi martyr the izaak. If someone figure the tomi and the tomi intertwine the izaak then the izaak figure the tomi. If someone is tangential and metric then they visit the izaak. If someone intertwine the tomi then the tomi intertwine the izaak. If someone martyr the tomi and they chase the tomi then the tomi martyr the izaak. If someone martyr the tomi then the tomi is not terminable. If the tomi martyr the izaak then the tomi figure the izaak. If someone martyr the tomi and the tomi does not chase the izaak then the tomi figure the izaak. If someone figure the izaak then they like the tomi. The tomi martyr the tomi.", "logic": "\nnot Intertwine(izaak, tomi)\nIntertwine(tomi, izaak)\nMartyr(tomi, izaak)\nforall x (Figure(x, tomi) and Intertwine(tomi, izaak) -> Figure(izaak, tomi))\nforall x (Tangential(x) and Metric(x) -> Figure(x, izaak))\nforall x (Intertwine(x, tomi) -> Intertwine(tomi, izaak))\nforall x (Martyr(x, tomi) and Intertwine(x, tomi) -> Martyr(tomi, izaak))\nforall x (Martyr(x, tomi) -> not Terminable(tomi))\nMartyr(tomi, izaak) -> Figure(tomi, izaak)\nforall x (Martyr(x, tomi) and not Intertwine(tomi, izaak) -> Figure(tomi, izaak))\nforall x (Figure(x, izaak) -> Martyr(x, tomi))\n\nMartyr(tomi, tomi)\n\nMartyr(tomi, izaak) and Martyr(tomi, izaak) -> Figure(tomi, izaak) -> therefore Figure(tomi, izaak) Figure(tomi, izaak) and forall x (Figure(x, izaak) -> Martyr(x, tomi)) -> therefore Martyr(tomi, tomi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The rosella does not chase the giuseppe. The giuseppe exonerate the rosella. The giuseppe specialise the rosella. If someone segregate the giuseppe and the giuseppe exonerate the rosella then the rosella segregate the giuseppe. If someone is untypical and graspable then they visit the rosella. If someone exonerate the giuseppe then the giuseppe exonerate the rosella. If someone specialise the giuseppe and they chase the giuseppe then the giuseppe specialise the rosella. If someone specialise the giuseppe then the giuseppe is not voltarean. If the giuseppe specialise the rosella then the giuseppe segregate the rosella. If someone specialise the giuseppe and the giuseppe does not chase the rosella then the giuseppe segregate the rosella. If someone segregate the rosella then they like the giuseppe. The giuseppe does not like the giuseppe.", "logic": "\nnot Exonerate(rosella, giuseppe)\nExonerate(giuseppe, rosella)\nSpecialise(giuseppe, rosella)\nforall x (Segregate(x, giuseppe) and Exonerate(giuseppe, rosella) -> Segregate(rosella, giuseppe))\nforall x (Untypical(x) and Graspable(x) -> Segregate(x, rosella))\nforall x (Exonerate(x, giuseppe) -> Exonerate(giuseppe, rosella))\nforall x (Specialise(x, giuseppe) and Exonerate(x, giuseppe) -> Specialise(giuseppe, rosella))\nforall x (Specialise(x, giuseppe) -> not Voltarean(giuseppe))\nSpecialise(giuseppe, rosella) -> Segregate(giuseppe, rosella)\nforall x (Specialise(x, giuseppe) and not Exonerate(giuseppe, rosella) -> Segregate(giuseppe, rosella))\nforall x (Segregate(x, rosella) -> Specialise(x, giuseppe))\n\nnot Specialise(giuseppe, giuseppe)\n\nSpecialise(giuseppe, rosella) and Specialise(giuseppe, rosella) -> Segregate(giuseppe, rosella) -> therefore Segregate(giuseppe, rosella) Segregate(giuseppe, rosella) and forall x (Segregate(x, rosella) -> Specialise(x, giuseppe)) -> therefore Specialise(giuseppe, giuseppe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The zachariah does not chase the kendal. The kendal scry the zachariah. The kendal enliven the zachariah. If someone disinvolve the kendal and the kendal scry the zachariah then the zachariah disinvolve the kendal. If someone is aplacental and wily then they visit the zachariah. If someone scry the kendal then the kendal scry the zachariah. If someone enliven the kendal and they chase the kendal then the kendal enliven the zachariah. If someone enliven the kendal then the kendal is not intrinsic. If the kendal enliven the zachariah then the kendal disinvolve the zachariah. If someone enliven the kendal and the kendal does not chase the zachariah then the kendal disinvolve the zachariah. If someone disinvolve the zachariah then they like the kendal. The kendal is not intrinsic.", "logic": "\nnot Scry(zachariah, kendal)\nScry(kendal, zachariah)\nEnliven(kendal, zachariah)\nforall x (Disinvolve(x, kendal) and Scry(kendal, zachariah) -> Disinvolve(zachariah, kendal))\nforall x (Aplacental(x) and Wily(x) -> Disinvolve(x, zachariah))\nforall x (Scry(x, kendal) -> Scry(kendal, zachariah))\nforall x (Enliven(x, kendal) and Scry(x, kendal) -> Enliven(kendal, zachariah))\nforall x (Enliven(x, kendal) -> not Intrinsic(kendal))\nEnliven(kendal, zachariah) -> Disinvolve(kendal, zachariah)\nforall x (Enliven(x, kendal) and not Scry(kendal, zachariah) -> Disinvolve(kendal, zachariah))\nforall x (Disinvolve(x, zachariah) -> Enliven(x, kendal))\n\nnot Intrinsic(kendal)\n\nEnliven(kendal, zachariah) and Enliven(kendal, zachariah) -> Disinvolve(kendal, zachariah) -> therefore Disinvolve(kendal, zachariah) Disinvolve(kendal, zachariah) and forall x (Disinvolve(x, zachariah) -> Enliven(x, kendal)) -> therefore Enliven(kendal, kendal) Enliven(kendal, kendal) and forall x (Enliven(x, kendal) -> not Intrinsic(kendal)) -> therefore not Intrinsic(kendal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The avraham does not chase the hart. The hart bound the avraham. The hart dull the avraham. If someone heap the hart and the hart bound the avraham then the avraham heap the hart. If someone is eupnoeic and unsporting then they visit the avraham. If someone bound the hart then the hart bound the avraham. If someone dull the hart and they chase the hart then the hart dull the avraham. If someone dull the hart then the hart is not citric. If the hart dull the avraham then the hart heap the avraham. If someone dull the hart and the hart does not chase the avraham then the hart heap the avraham. If someone heap the avraham then they like the hart. The hart is citric.", "logic": "\nnot Bound(avraham, hart)\nBound(hart, avraham)\nDull(hart, avraham)\nforall x (Heap(x, hart) and Bound(hart, avraham) -> Heap(avraham, hart))\nforall x (Eupnoeic(x) and Unsporting(x) -> Heap(x, avraham))\nforall x (Bound(x, hart) -> Bound(hart, avraham))\nforall x (Dull(x, hart) and Bound(x, hart) -> Dull(hart, avraham))\nforall x (Dull(x, hart) -> not Citric(hart))\nDull(hart, avraham) -> Heap(hart, avraham)\nforall x (Dull(x, hart) and not Bound(hart, avraham) -> Heap(hart, avraham))\nforall x (Heap(x, avraham) -> Dull(x, hart))\n\nCitric(hart)\n\nDull(hart, avraham) and Dull(hart, avraham) -> Heap(hart, avraham) -> therefore Heap(hart, avraham) Heap(hart, avraham) and forall x (Heap(x, avraham) -> Dull(x, hart)) -> therefore Dull(hart, hart) Dull(hart, hart) and forall x (Dull(x, hart) -> not Citric(hart)) -> therefore not Citric(hart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The genna does not chase the tedi. The tedi prehend the genna. The tedi senesce the genna. If someone recommence the tedi and the tedi prehend the genna then the genna recommence the tedi. If someone is maroc and succulent then they visit the genna. If someone prehend the tedi then the tedi prehend the genna. If someone senesce the tedi and they chase the tedi then the tedi senesce the genna. If someone senesce the tedi then the tedi is not mucinoid. If the tedi senesce the genna then the tedi recommence the genna. If someone senesce the tedi and the tedi does not chase the genna then the tedi recommence the genna. If someone recommence the genna then they like the tedi. The genna does not visit the tedi.", "logic": "\nnot Prehend(genna, tedi)\nPrehend(tedi, genna)\nSenesce(tedi, genna)\nforall x (Recommence(x, tedi) and Prehend(tedi, genna) -> Recommence(genna, tedi))\nforall x (Maroc(x) and Succulent(x) -> Recommence(x, genna))\nforall x (Prehend(x, tedi) -> Prehend(tedi, genna))\nforall x (Senesce(x, tedi) and Prehend(x, tedi) -> Senesce(tedi, genna))\nforall x (Senesce(x, tedi) -> not Mucinoid(tedi))\nSenesce(tedi, genna) -> Recommence(tedi, genna)\nforall x (Senesce(x, tedi) and not Prehend(tedi, genna) -> Recommence(tedi, genna))\nforall x (Recommence(x, genna) -> Senesce(x, tedi))\n\nnot Recommence(genna, tedi)\n\nforall x (Recommence(x, tedi) and Prehend(tedi, genna) -> Recommence(genna, tedi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The godfry does not chase the kia. The kia offend the godfry. The kia raddle the godfry. If someone remind the kia and the kia offend the godfry then the godfry remind the kia. If someone is controlled and ramshackle then they visit the godfry. If someone offend the kia then the kia offend the godfry. If someone raddle the kia and they chase the kia then the kia raddle the godfry. If someone raddle the kia then the kia is not flush. If the kia raddle the godfry then the kia remind the godfry. If someone raddle the kia and the kia does not chase the godfry then the kia remind the godfry. If someone remind the godfry then they like the kia. The godfry raddle the kia.", "logic": "\nnot Offend(godfry, kia)\nOffend(kia, godfry)\nRaddle(kia, godfry)\nforall x (Remind(x, kia) and Offend(kia, godfry) -> Remind(godfry, kia))\nforall x (Controlled(x) and Ramshackle(x) -> Remind(x, godfry))\nforall x (Offend(x, kia) -> Offend(kia, godfry))\nforall x (Raddle(x, kia) and Offend(x, kia) -> Raddle(kia, godfry))\nforall x (Raddle(x, kia) -> not Flush(kia))\nRaddle(kia, godfry) -> Remind(kia, godfry)\nforall x (Raddle(x, kia) and not Offend(kia, godfry) -> Remind(kia, godfry))\nforall x (Remind(x, godfry) -> Raddle(x, kia))\n\nRaddle(godfry, kia)\n\nforall x (Remind(x, godfry) -> Raddle(x, kia)) <- forall x (Controlled(x) and Ramshackle(x) -> Remind(x, godfry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The bren does not chase the norbert. The norbert verdigris the bren. The norbert gentle the bren. If someone pearl the norbert and the norbert verdigris the bren then the bren pearl the norbert. If someone is habited and frayed then they visit the bren. If someone verdigris the norbert then the norbert verdigris the bren. If someone gentle the norbert and they chase the norbert then the norbert gentle the bren. If someone gentle the norbert then the norbert is not mothproof. If the norbert gentle the bren then the norbert pearl the bren. If someone gentle the norbert and the norbert does not chase the bren then the norbert pearl the bren. If someone pearl the bren then they like the norbert. The bren does not visit the bren.", "logic": "\nnot Verdigris(bren, norbert)\nVerdigris(norbert, bren)\nGentle(norbert, bren)\nforall x (Pearl(x, norbert) and Verdigris(norbert, bren) -> Pearl(bren, norbert))\nforall x (Habited(x) and Frayed(x) -> Pearl(x, bren))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, norbert) -> Verdigris(norbert, bren))\nforall x (Gentle(x, norbert) and Verdigris(x, norbert) -> Gentle(norbert, bren))\nforall x (Gentle(x, norbert) -> not Mothproof(norbert))\nGentle(norbert, bren) -> Pearl(norbert, bren)\nforall x (Gentle(x, norbert) and not Verdigris(norbert, bren) -> Pearl(norbert, bren))\nforall x (Pearl(x, bren) -> Gentle(x, norbert))\n\nnot Pearl(bren, bren)\n\nforall x (Habited(x) and Frayed(x) -> Pearl(x, bren)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The leopold does not chase the gunvor. The gunvor misdeal the leopold. The gunvor corduroy the leopold. If someone behead the gunvor and the gunvor misdeal the leopold then the leopold behead the gunvor. If someone is incurved and despondent then they visit the leopold. If someone misdeal the gunvor then the gunvor misdeal the leopold. If someone corduroy the gunvor and they chase the gunvor then the gunvor corduroy the leopold. If someone corduroy the gunvor then the gunvor is not extraneous. If the gunvor corduroy the leopold then the gunvor behead the leopold. If someone corduroy the gunvor and the gunvor does not chase the leopold then the gunvor behead the leopold. If someone behead the leopold then they like the gunvor. The leopold misdeal the leopold.", "logic": "\nnot Misdeal(leopold, gunvor)\nMisdeal(gunvor, leopold)\nCorduroy(gunvor, leopold)\nforall x (Behead(x, gunvor) and Misdeal(gunvor, leopold) -> Behead(leopold, gunvor))\nforall x (Incurved(x) and Despondent(x) -> Behead(x, leopold))\nforall x (Misdeal(x, gunvor) -> Misdeal(gunvor, leopold))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, gunvor) and Misdeal(x, gunvor) -> Corduroy(gunvor, leopold))\nforall x (Corduroy(x, gunvor) -> not Extraneous(gunvor))\nCorduroy(gunvor, leopold) -> Behead(gunvor, leopold)\nforall x (Corduroy(x, gunvor) and not Misdeal(gunvor, leopold) -> Behead(gunvor, leopold))\nforall x (Behead(x, leopold) -> Corduroy(x, gunvor))\n\nMisdeal(leopold, leopold)\n\nMisdeal(leopold, leopold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The morten does not chase the kelvin. The kelvin rumple the morten. The kelvin cauterize the morten. If someone connive the kelvin and the kelvin rumple the morten then the morten connive the kelvin. If someone is prolific and bacchantic then they visit the morten. If someone rumple the kelvin then the kelvin rumple the morten. If someone cauterize the kelvin and they chase the kelvin then the kelvin cauterize the morten. If someone cauterize the kelvin then the kelvin is not trilobate. If the kelvin cauterize the morten then the kelvin connive the morten. If someone cauterize the kelvin and the kelvin does not chase the morten then the kelvin connive the morten. If someone connive the morten then they like the kelvin. The kelvin is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Rumple(morten, kelvin)\nRumple(kelvin, morten)\nCauterize(kelvin, morten)\nforall x (Connive(x, kelvin) and Rumple(kelvin, morten) -> Connive(morten, kelvin))\nforall x (Prolific(x) and Bacchantic(x) -> Connive(x, morten))\nforall x (Rumple(x, kelvin) -> Rumple(kelvin, morten))\nforall x (Cauterize(x, kelvin) and Rumple(x, kelvin) -> Cauterize(kelvin, morten))\nforall x (Cauterize(x, kelvin) -> not Trilobate(kelvin))\nCauterize(kelvin, morten) -> Connive(kelvin, morten)\nforall x (Cauterize(x, kelvin) and not Rumple(kelvin, morten) -> Connive(kelvin, morten))\nforall x (Connive(x, morten) -> Cauterize(x, kelvin))\n\nnot Round(kelvin)\n\nnot Round(kelvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The binnie does not chase the dalila. The dalila congeal the binnie. The dalila saber the binnie. If someone shadowbox the dalila and the dalila congeal the binnie then the binnie shadowbox the dalila. If someone is trim and extraneous then they visit the binnie. If someone congeal the dalila then the dalila congeal the binnie. If someone saber the dalila and they chase the dalila then the dalila saber the binnie. If someone saber the dalila then the dalila is not unoccupied. If the dalila saber the binnie then the dalila shadowbox the binnie. If someone saber the dalila and the dalila does not chase the binnie then the dalila shadowbox the binnie. If someone shadowbox the binnie then they like the dalila. The binnie is cold.", "logic": "\nnot Congeal(binnie, dalila)\nCongeal(dalila, binnie)\nSaber(dalila, binnie)\nforall x (Shadowbox(x, dalila) and Congeal(dalila, binnie) -> Shadowbox(binnie, dalila))\nforall x (Trim(x) and Extraneous(x) -> Shadowbox(x, binnie))\nforall x (Congeal(x, dalila) -> Congeal(dalila, binnie))\nforall x (Saber(x, dalila) and Congeal(x, dalila) -> Saber(dalila, binnie))\nforall x (Saber(x, dalila) -> not Unoccupied(dalila))\nSaber(dalila, binnie) -> Shadowbox(dalila, binnie)\nforall x (Saber(x, dalila) and not Congeal(dalila, binnie) -> Shadowbox(dalila, binnie))\nforall x (Shadowbox(x, binnie) -> Saber(x, dalila))\n\nCold(binnie)\n\nCold(binnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The richardo does not chase the lawerence. The lawerence blitzkrieg the richardo. The lawerence beseem the richardo. If someone wager the lawerence and the lawerence blitzkrieg the richardo then the richardo wager the lawerence. If someone is bronzed and peaceful then they visit the richardo. If someone blitzkrieg the lawerence then the lawerence blitzkrieg the richardo. If someone beseem the lawerence and they chase the lawerence then the lawerence beseem the richardo. If someone beseem the lawerence then the lawerence is not egyptian. If the lawerence beseem the richardo then the lawerence wager the richardo. If someone beseem the lawerence and the lawerence does not chase the richardo then the lawerence wager the richardo. If someone wager the richardo then they like the lawerence. The richardo is not peaceful.", "logic": "\nnot Blitzkrieg(richardo, lawerence)\nBlitzkrieg(lawerence, richardo)\nBeseem(lawerence, richardo)\nforall x (Wager(x, lawerence) and Blitzkrieg(lawerence, richardo) -> Wager(richardo, lawerence))\nforall x (Bronzed(x) and Peaceful(x) -> Wager(x, richardo))\nforall x (Blitzkrieg(x, lawerence) -> Blitzkrieg(lawerence, richardo))\nforall x (Beseem(x, lawerence) and Blitzkrieg(x, lawerence) -> Beseem(lawerence, richardo))\nforall x (Beseem(x, lawerence) -> not Egyptian(lawerence))\nBeseem(lawerence, richardo) -> Wager(lawerence, richardo)\nforall x (Beseem(x, lawerence) and not Blitzkrieg(lawerence, richardo) -> Wager(lawerence, richardo))\nforall x (Wager(x, richardo) -> Beseem(x, lawerence))\n\nnot Peaceful(richardo)\n\nnot Peaceful(richardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "The georges does not chase the valina. The valina shrink the georges. The valina flower the georges. If someone skirmish the valina and the valina shrink the georges then the georges skirmish the valina. If someone is asphaltic and long then they visit the georges. If someone shrink the valina then the valina shrink the georges. If someone flower the valina and they chase the valina then the valina flower the georges. If someone flower the valina then the valina is not unmatched. If the valina flower the georges then the valina skirmish the georges. If someone flower the valina and the valina does not chase the georges then the valina skirmish the georges. If someone skirmish the georges then they like the valina. The valina shrink the valina.", "logic": "\nnot Shrink(georges, valina)\nShrink(valina, georges)\nFlower(valina, georges)\nforall x (Skirmish(x, valina) and Shrink(valina, georges) -> Skirmish(georges, valina))\nforall x (Asphaltic(x) and Long(x) -> Skirmish(x, georges))\nforall x (Shrink(x, valina) -> Shrink(valina, georges))\nforall x (Flower(x, valina) and Shrink(x, valina) -> Flower(valina, georges))\nforall x (Flower(x, valina) -> not Unmatched(valina))\nFlower(valina, georges) -> Skirmish(valina, georges)\nforall x (Flower(x, valina) and not Shrink(valina, georges) -> Skirmish(valina, georges))\nforall x (Skirmish(x, georges) -> Flower(x, valina))\n\nShrink(valina, valina)\n\nShrink(valina, valina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1402"} {"premises": "Paulie is attic. Paulie is seemly. Paulie is endoscopic. Round people are godless. Kind, attic people are tacit. Paulie is endoscopic.", "logic": "\nAttic(paulie)\nSeemly(paulie)\nEndoscopic(paulie)\nforall x (Endoscopic(x) -> Godless(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Attic(x) -> Tacit(x))\n\nEndoscopic(paulie)\n\ntherefore Endoscopic(paulie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-867"} {"premises": "Debby is salted. Debby is colloquial. Debby is patronised. Round people are lilting. Kind, salted people are valued. Debby is not salted.", "logic": "\nSalted(debby)\nColloquial(debby)\nPatronised(debby)\nforall x (Patronised(x) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Planned(x) and Salted(x) -> Valued(x))\n\nnot Salted(debby)\n\ntherefore Salted(debby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-867"} {"premises": "Doretta is porose. Doretta is strenuous. Doretta is patched. Round people are undyed. Kind, porose people are gibbose. Doretta is undyed.", "logic": "\nPorose(doretta)\nStrenuous(doretta)\nPatched(doretta)\nforall x (Patched(x) -> Undyed(x))\nforall x (Ionised(x) and Porose(x) -> Gibbose(x))\n\nUndyed(doretta)\n\nPatched(doretta) and forall x (Patched(x) -> Undyed(x)) -> therefore Undyed(doretta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-867"} {"premises": "Ethyl is confiding. Ethyl is unalarming. Ethyl is winking. Round people are unenviable. Kind, confiding people are phrasal. Ethyl is not unenviable.", "logic": "\nConfiding(ethyl)\nUnalarming(ethyl)\nWinking(ethyl)\nforall x (Winking(x) -> Unenviable(x))\nforall x (Precooked(x) and Confiding(x) -> Phrasal(x))\n\nnot Unenviable(ethyl)\n\nWinking(ethyl) and forall x (Winking(x) -> Unenviable(x)) -> therefore Unenviable(ethyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-867"} {"premises": "Quent is isotopic. Quent is alated. Quent is estival. Round people are nitric. Kind, isotopic people are sapid. Quent is not sapid.", "logic": "\nIsotopic(quent)\nAlated(quent)\nEstival(quent)\nforall x (Estival(x) -> Nitric(x))\nforall x (Plantar(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Sapid(x))\n\nnot Sapid(quent)\n\nforall x (Plantar(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Sapid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-867"} {"premises": "Orel is topical. Orel is educated. Orel is ninepenny. Round people are groovy. Kind, topical people are tenor. Orel is unsugared.", "logic": "\nTopical(orel)\nEducated(orel)\nNinepenny(orel)\nforall x (Ninepenny(x) -> Groovy(x))\nforall x (Unsugared(x) and Topical(x) -> Tenor(x))\n\nUnsugared(orel)\n\nUnsugared(orel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-867"} {"premises": "Irma is copious. Irma is seamanlike. Irma is imposing. Madison is unlicensed. Shimon is begotten. Beryl is heedless. Beryl is unlicensed. Beryl is copious. Beryl is steadied. Beryl is imposing. If someone is unlicensed and copious then they are begotten. If someone is heedless then they are unlicensed. All copious people are heedless. All steadied, heedless people are copious. If someone is imposing then they are seamanlike. All steadied people are imposing. Irma is seamanlike.", "logic": "\nCopious(irma)\nSeamanlike(irma)\nImposing(irma)\nUnlicensed(madison)\nBegotten(shimon)\nHeedless(beryl)\nUnlicensed(beryl)\nCopious(beryl)\nSteadied(beryl)\nImposing(beryl)\nforall x (Unlicensed(x) and Copious(x) -> Begotten(x))\nforall x (Heedless(x) -> Unlicensed(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Heedless(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) and Heedless(x) -> Copious(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) -> Seamanlike(x))\nforall x (Steadied(x) -> Imposing(x))\n\nSeamanlike(irma)\n\ntherefore Seamanlike(irma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Magdalena is leafy. Magdalena is florid. Magdalena is hydroponic. Melania is upmost. Rheta is corinthian. Billi is flash. Billi is upmost. Billi is leafy. Billi is sardonic. Billi is hydroponic. If someone is upmost and leafy then they are corinthian. If someone is flash then they are upmost. All leafy people are flash. All sardonic, flash people are leafy. If someone is hydroponic then they are florid. All sardonic people are hydroponic. Melania is not upmost.", "logic": "\nLeafy(magdalena)\nFlorid(magdalena)\nHydroponic(magdalena)\nUpmost(melania)\nCorinthian(rheta)\nFlash(billi)\nUpmost(billi)\nLeafy(billi)\nSardonic(billi)\nHydroponic(billi)\nforall x (Upmost(x) and Leafy(x) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Flash(x) -> Upmost(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) -> Flash(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) and Flash(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Florid(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\n\nnot Upmost(melania)\n\ntherefore Upmost(melania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Mace is abstemious. Mace is plumbous. Mace is phenomenal. Devi is jellylike. Vanya is altaic. Gustavo is brief. Gustavo is jellylike. Gustavo is abstemious. Gustavo is delphic. Gustavo is phenomenal. If someone is jellylike and abstemious then they are altaic. If someone is brief then they are jellylike. All abstemious people are brief. All delphic, brief people are abstemious. If someone is phenomenal then they are plumbous. All delphic people are phenomenal. Mace is brief.", "logic": "\nAbstemious(mace)\nPlumbous(mace)\nPhenomenal(mace)\nJellylike(devi)\nAltaic(vanya)\nBrief(gustavo)\nJellylike(gustavo)\nAbstemious(gustavo)\nDelphic(gustavo)\nPhenomenal(gustavo)\nforall x (Jellylike(x) and Abstemious(x) -> Altaic(x))\nforall x (Brief(x) -> Jellylike(x))\nforall x (Abstemious(x) -> Brief(x))\nforall x (Delphic(x) and Brief(x) -> Abstemious(x))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> Plumbous(x))\nforall x (Delphic(x) -> Phenomenal(x))\n\nBrief(mace)\n\nAbstemious(mace) and forall x (Abstemious(x) -> Brief(x)) -> therefore Brief(mace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Adriana is asiatic. Adriana is penal. Adriana is flawless. Lela is reflecting. Hadrian is outermost. Talya is magnified. Talya is reflecting. Talya is asiatic. Talya is climbable. Talya is flawless. If someone is reflecting and asiatic then they are outermost. If someone is magnified then they are reflecting. All asiatic people are magnified. All climbable, magnified people are asiatic. If someone is flawless then they are penal. All climbable people are flawless. Adriana is not magnified.", "logic": "\nAsiatic(adriana)\nPenal(adriana)\nFlawless(adriana)\nReflecting(lela)\nOutermost(hadrian)\nMagnified(talya)\nReflecting(talya)\nAsiatic(talya)\nClimbable(talya)\nFlawless(talya)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Asiatic(x) -> Outermost(x))\nforall x (Magnified(x) -> Reflecting(x))\nforall x (Asiatic(x) -> Magnified(x))\nforall x (Climbable(x) and Magnified(x) -> Asiatic(x))\nforall x (Flawless(x) -> Penal(x))\nforall x (Climbable(x) -> Flawless(x))\n\nnot Magnified(adriana)\n\nAsiatic(adriana) and forall x (Asiatic(x) -> Magnified(x)) -> therefore Magnified(adriana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Olga is mantic. Olga is alienable. Olga is unmediated. Sax is homophile. Michelle is mired. Corrina is outdoor. Corrina is homophile. Corrina is mantic. Corrina is senescent. Corrina is unmediated. If someone is homophile and mantic then they are mired. If someone is outdoor then they are homophile. All mantic people are outdoor. All senescent, outdoor people are mantic. If someone is unmediated then they are alienable. All senescent people are unmediated. Olga is homophile.", "logic": "\nMantic(olga)\nAlienable(olga)\nUnmediated(olga)\nHomophile(sax)\nMired(michelle)\nOutdoor(corrina)\nHomophile(corrina)\nMantic(corrina)\nSenescent(corrina)\nUnmediated(corrina)\nforall x (Homophile(x) and Mantic(x) -> Mired(x))\nforall x (Outdoor(x) -> Homophile(x))\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Outdoor(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Outdoor(x) -> Mantic(x))\nforall x (Unmediated(x) -> Alienable(x))\nforall x (Senescent(x) -> Unmediated(x))\n\nHomophile(olga)\n\nMantic(olga) and forall x (Mantic(x) -> Outdoor(x)) -> therefore Outdoor(olga) Outdoor(olga) and forall x (Outdoor(x) -> Homophile(x)) -> therefore Homophile(olga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Anallise is ungulate. Anallise is barbate. Anallise is neat. Lynnette is precise. Storm is maverick. Marcela is cranky. Marcela is precise. Marcela is ungulate. Marcela is yawning. Marcela is neat. If someone is precise and ungulate then they are maverick. If someone is cranky then they are precise. All ungulate people are cranky. All yawning, cranky people are ungulate. If someone is neat then they are barbate. All yawning people are neat. Anallise is not precise.", "logic": "\nUngulate(anallise)\nBarbate(anallise)\nNeat(anallise)\nPrecise(lynnette)\nMaverick(storm)\nCranky(marcela)\nPrecise(marcela)\nUngulate(marcela)\nYawning(marcela)\nNeat(marcela)\nforall x (Precise(x) and Ungulate(x) -> Maverick(x))\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> Precise(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) -> Cranky(x))\nforall x (Yawning(x) and Cranky(x) -> Ungulate(x))\nforall x (Neat(x) -> Barbate(x))\nforall x (Yawning(x) -> Neat(x))\n\nnot Precise(anallise)\n\nUngulate(anallise) and forall x (Ungulate(x) -> Cranky(x)) -> therefore Cranky(anallise) Cranky(anallise) and forall x (Cranky(x) -> Precise(x)) -> therefore Precise(anallise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Rhiamon is ghanaian. Rhiamon is ripe. Rhiamon is negligible. Ravi is guiltless. Roarke is banded. Ibrahim is dysplastic. Ibrahim is guiltless. Ibrahim is ghanaian. Ibrahim is exodontic. Ibrahim is negligible. If someone is guiltless and ghanaian then they are banded. If someone is dysplastic then they are guiltless. All ghanaian people are dysplastic. All exodontic, dysplastic people are ghanaian. If someone is negligible then they are ripe. All exodontic people are negligible. Rhiamon is banded.", "logic": "\nGhanaian(rhiamon)\nRipe(rhiamon)\nNegligible(rhiamon)\nGuiltless(ravi)\nBanded(roarke)\nDysplastic(ibrahim)\nGuiltless(ibrahim)\nGhanaian(ibrahim)\nExodontic(ibrahim)\nNegligible(ibrahim)\nforall x (Guiltless(x) and Ghanaian(x) -> Banded(x))\nforall x (Dysplastic(x) -> Guiltless(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Dysplastic(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) and Dysplastic(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Negligible(x) -> Ripe(x))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) -> Negligible(x))\n\nBanded(rhiamon)\n\nGhanaian(rhiamon) and forall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Dysplastic(x)) -> therefore Dysplastic(rhiamon) Dysplastic(rhiamon) and forall x (Dysplastic(x) -> Guiltless(x)) -> therefore Guiltless(rhiamon) Guiltless(rhiamon) and Ghanaian(rhiamon) and forall x (Guiltless(x) and Ghanaian(x) -> Banded(x)) -> therefore Banded(rhiamon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Tandi is oafish. Tandi is sandalled. Tandi is witchlike. Olwen is successive. Daffie is descendent. Carrie is responsive. Carrie is successive. Carrie is oafish. Carrie is antimonial. Carrie is witchlike. If someone is successive and oafish then they are descendent. If someone is responsive then they are successive. All oafish people are responsive. All antimonial, responsive people are oafish. If someone is witchlike then they are sandalled. All antimonial people are witchlike. Tandi is not descendent.", "logic": "\nOafish(tandi)\nSandalled(tandi)\nWitchlike(tandi)\nSuccessive(olwen)\nDescendent(daffie)\nResponsive(carrie)\nSuccessive(carrie)\nOafish(carrie)\nAntimonial(carrie)\nWitchlike(carrie)\nforall x (Successive(x) and Oafish(x) -> Descendent(x))\nforall x (Responsive(x) -> Successive(x))\nforall x (Oafish(x) -> Responsive(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) and Responsive(x) -> Oafish(x))\nforall x (Witchlike(x) -> Sandalled(x))\nforall x (Antimonial(x) -> Witchlike(x))\n\nnot Descendent(tandi)\n\nOafish(tandi) and forall x (Oafish(x) -> Responsive(x)) -> therefore Responsive(tandi) Responsive(tandi) and forall x (Responsive(x) -> Successive(x)) -> therefore Successive(tandi) Successive(tandi) and Oafish(tandi) and forall x (Successive(x) and Oafish(x) -> Descendent(x)) -> therefore Descendent(tandi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Anjela is engrossed. Anjela is legless. Anjela is overarm. Marianne is confined. Stu is permanent. Armand is oozing. Armand is confined. Armand is engrossed. Armand is null. Armand is overarm. If someone is confined and engrossed then they are permanent. If someone is oozing then they are confined. All engrossed people are oozing. All null, oozing people are engrossed. If someone is overarm then they are legless. All null people are overarm. Marianne is not engrossed.", "logic": "\nEngrossed(anjela)\nLegless(anjela)\nOverarm(anjela)\nConfined(marianne)\nPermanent(stu)\nOozing(armand)\nConfined(armand)\nEngrossed(armand)\nNull(armand)\nOverarm(armand)\nforall x (Confined(x) and Engrossed(x) -> Permanent(x))\nforall x (Oozing(x) -> Confined(x))\nforall x (Engrossed(x) -> Oozing(x))\nforall x (Null(x) and Oozing(x) -> Engrossed(x))\nforall x (Overarm(x) -> Legless(x))\nforall x (Null(x) -> Overarm(x))\n\nnot Engrossed(marianne)\n\nforall x (Null(x) and Oozing(x) -> Engrossed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Husain is eroded. Husain is unsung. Husain is recyclable. Sloan is obscure. Dannye is thermic. Clementia is shackled. Clementia is obscure. Clementia is eroded. Clementia is doomed. Clementia is recyclable. If someone is obscure and eroded then they are thermic. If someone is shackled then they are obscure. All eroded people are shackled. All doomed, shackled people are eroded. If someone is recyclable then they are unsung. All doomed people are recyclable. Sloan is recyclable.", "logic": "\nEroded(husain)\nUnsung(husain)\nRecyclable(husain)\nObscure(sloan)\nThermic(dannye)\nShackled(clementia)\nObscure(clementia)\nEroded(clementia)\nDoomed(clementia)\nRecyclable(clementia)\nforall x (Obscure(x) and Eroded(x) -> Thermic(x))\nforall x (Shackled(x) -> Obscure(x))\nforall x (Eroded(x) -> Shackled(x))\nforall x (Doomed(x) and Shackled(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) -> Unsung(x))\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Recyclable(x))\n\nRecyclable(sloan)\n\nforall x (Doomed(x) -> Recyclable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Lauralee is smarmy. Lauralee is astragalar. Lauralee is amoristic. Gabbie is diarrheal. Spence is described. Inga is classified. Inga is diarrheal. Inga is smarmy. Inga is genial. Inga is amoristic. If someone is diarrheal and smarmy then they are described. If someone is classified then they are diarrheal. All smarmy people are classified. All genial, classified people are smarmy. If someone is amoristic then they are astragalar. All genial people are amoristic. Spence is not diarrheal.", "logic": "\nSmarmy(lauralee)\nAstragalar(lauralee)\nAmoristic(lauralee)\nDiarrheal(gabbie)\nDescribed(spence)\nClassified(inga)\nDiarrheal(inga)\nSmarmy(inga)\nGenial(inga)\nAmoristic(inga)\nforall x (Diarrheal(x) and Smarmy(x) -> Described(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Diarrheal(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) and Classified(x) -> Smarmy(x))\nforall x (Amoristic(x) -> Astragalar(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) -> Amoristic(x))\n\nnot Diarrheal(spence)\n\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Diarrheal(x)) <- forall x (Smarmy(x) -> Classified(x)) <- forall x (Genial(x) and Classified(x) -> Smarmy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Fyodor is shameful. Fyodor is lubricated. Fyodor is collateral. Chrystel is nurtural. Guenevere is sheer. Ninette is continual. Ninette is nurtural. Ninette is shameful. Ninette is amenable. Ninette is collateral. If someone is nurtural and shameful then they are sheer. If someone is continual then they are nurtural. All shameful people are continual. All amenable, continual people are shameful. If someone is collateral then they are lubricated. All amenable people are collateral. Chrystel is sheer.", "logic": "\nShameful(fyodor)\nLubricated(fyodor)\nCollateral(fyodor)\nNurtural(chrystel)\nSheer(guenevere)\nContinual(ninette)\nNurtural(ninette)\nShameful(ninette)\nAmenable(ninette)\nCollateral(ninette)\nforall x (Nurtural(x) and Shameful(x) -> Sheer(x))\nforall x (Continual(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Shameful(x) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) and Continual(x) -> Shameful(x))\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> Lubricated(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> Collateral(x))\n\nSheer(chrystel)\n\nforall x (Nurtural(x) and Shameful(x) -> Sheer(x)) <- forall x (Amenable(x) and Continual(x) -> Shameful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Richie is hierarchal. Richie is unfree. Richie is unnotched. Jeraldine is piteous. Bjorne is spoilt. Lin is astatic. Lin is piteous. Lin is hierarchal. Lin is minimum. Lin is unnotched. If someone is piteous and hierarchal then they are spoilt. If someone is astatic then they are piteous. All hierarchal people are astatic. All minimum, astatic people are hierarchal. If someone is unnotched then they are unfree. All minimum people are unnotched. Bjorne is not minimum.", "logic": "\nHierarchal(richie)\nUnfree(richie)\nUnnotched(richie)\nPiteous(jeraldine)\nSpoilt(bjorne)\nAstatic(lin)\nPiteous(lin)\nHierarchal(lin)\nMinimum(lin)\nUnnotched(lin)\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Hierarchal(x) -> Spoilt(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) -> Piteous(x))\nforall x (Hierarchal(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Minimum(x) and Astatic(x) -> Hierarchal(x))\nforall x (Unnotched(x) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Minimum(x) -> Unnotched(x))\n\nnot Minimum(bjorne)\n\nnot Minimum(bjorne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Ambrose is grave. Ambrose is outclassed. Ambrose is salient. Burton is angolan. Marabel is uncleanly. Erastus is lxvi. Erastus is angolan. Erastus is grave. Erastus is nasty. Erastus is salient. If someone is angolan and grave then they are uncleanly. If someone is lxvi then they are angolan. All grave people are lxvi. All nasty, lxvi people are grave. If someone is salient then they are outclassed. All nasty people are salient. Ambrose is nasty.", "logic": "\nGrave(ambrose)\nOutclassed(ambrose)\nSalient(ambrose)\nAngolan(burton)\nUncleanly(marabel)\nLxvi(erastus)\nAngolan(erastus)\nGrave(erastus)\nNasty(erastus)\nSalient(erastus)\nforall x (Angolan(x) and Grave(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\nforall x (Lxvi(x) -> Angolan(x))\nforall x (Grave(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Nasty(x) and Lxvi(x) -> Grave(x))\nforall x (Salient(x) -> Outclassed(x))\nforall x (Nasty(x) -> Salient(x))\n\nNasty(ambrose)\n\nNasty(ambrose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-79"} {"premises": "Adrianne is aeolian. Adrianne is refreshful. Bartie is refreshful. Bartie is resultant. Bartie is mechanized. Bartie is sceptred. Bartie is somalian. Wendeline is resultant. Wendeline is mechanized. Wendeline is somalian. All mechanized people are aeolian. If Wendeline is aeolian then Wendeline is inbred. If someone is aeolian and sceptred then they are resultant. If someone is mechanized and aeolian then they are resultant. Big, inbred people are sceptred. All mechanized people are refreshful. Wendeline is resultant.", "logic": "\nAeolian(adrianne)\nRefreshful(adrianne)\nRefreshful(bartie)\nResultant(bartie)\nMechanized(bartie)\nSceptred(bartie)\nSomalian(bartie)\nResultant(wendeline)\nMechanized(wendeline)\nSomalian(wendeline)\nforall x (Mechanized(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nAeolian(wendeline) -> Inbred(wendeline)\nforall x (Aeolian(x) and Sceptred(x) -> Resultant(x))\nforall x (Mechanized(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Resultant(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) and Inbred(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Mechanized(x) -> Refreshful(x))\n\nResultant(wendeline)\n\ntherefore Resultant(wendeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Britta is cathedral. Britta is clubfooted. Justina is clubfooted. Justina is marmorean. Justina is ashen. Justina is capsulated. Justina is absorptive. Zaneta is marmorean. Zaneta is ashen. Zaneta is absorptive. All ashen people are cathedral. If Zaneta is cathedral then Zaneta is untangled. If someone is cathedral and capsulated then they are marmorean. If someone is ashen and cathedral then they are marmorean. Big, untangled people are capsulated. All ashen people are clubfooted. Britta is not clubfooted.", "logic": "\nCathedral(britta)\nClubfooted(britta)\nClubfooted(justina)\nMarmorean(justina)\nAshen(justina)\nCapsulated(justina)\nAbsorptive(justina)\nMarmorean(zaneta)\nAshen(zaneta)\nAbsorptive(zaneta)\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nCathedral(zaneta) -> Untangled(zaneta)\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Capsulated(x) -> Marmorean(x))\nforall x (Ashen(x) and Cathedral(x) -> Marmorean(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Untangled(x) -> Capsulated(x))\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> Clubfooted(x))\n\nnot Clubfooted(britta)\n\ntherefore Clubfooted(britta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Darwin is unmourned. Darwin is headstrong. Jackson is headstrong. Jackson is marine. Jackson is caespitose. Jackson is grieving. Jackson is absolute. Dorit is marine. Dorit is caespitose. Dorit is absolute. All caespitose people are unmourned. If Dorit is unmourned then Dorit is colloidal. If someone is unmourned and grieving then they are marine. If someone is caespitose and unmourned then they are marine. Big, colloidal people are grieving. All caespitose people are headstrong. Dorit is headstrong.", "logic": "\nUnmourned(darwin)\nHeadstrong(darwin)\nHeadstrong(jackson)\nMarine(jackson)\nCaespitose(jackson)\nGrieving(jackson)\nAbsolute(jackson)\nMarine(dorit)\nCaespitose(dorit)\nAbsolute(dorit)\nforall x (Caespitose(x) -> Unmourned(x))\nUnmourned(dorit) -> Colloidal(dorit)\nforall x (Unmourned(x) and Grieving(x) -> Marine(x))\nforall x (Caespitose(x) and Unmourned(x) -> Marine(x))\nforall x (Unmourned(x) and Colloidal(x) -> Grieving(x))\nforall x (Caespitose(x) -> Headstrong(x))\n\nHeadstrong(dorit)\n\nCaespitose(dorit) and forall x (Caespitose(x) -> Headstrong(x)) -> therefore Headstrong(dorit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Kendal is literal. Kendal is circuitous. Giorgi is circuitous. Giorgi is undepicted. Giorgi is enervating. Giorgi is verbose. Giorgi is fisheye. Beaufort is undepicted. Beaufort is enervating. Beaufort is fisheye. All enervating people are literal. If Beaufort is literal then Beaufort is infertile. If someone is literal and verbose then they are undepicted. If someone is enervating and literal then they are undepicted. Big, infertile people are verbose. All enervating people are circuitous. Giorgi is not literal.", "logic": "\nLiteral(kendal)\nCircuitous(kendal)\nCircuitous(giorgi)\nUndepicted(giorgi)\nEnervating(giorgi)\nVerbose(giorgi)\nFisheye(giorgi)\nUndepicted(beaufort)\nEnervating(beaufort)\nFisheye(beaufort)\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Literal(x))\nLiteral(beaufort) -> Infertile(beaufort)\nforall x (Literal(x) and Verbose(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Enervating(x) and Literal(x) -> Undepicted(x))\nforall x (Literal(x) and Infertile(x) -> Verbose(x))\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Circuitous(x))\n\nnot Literal(giorgi)\n\nEnervating(giorgi) and forall x (Enervating(x) -> Literal(x)) -> therefore Literal(giorgi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Alena is javan. Alena is unmodified. Denis is unmodified. Denis is prepaid. Denis is animal. Denis is lavish. Denis is bronchitic. Cresa is prepaid. Cresa is animal. Cresa is bronchitic. All animal people are javan. If Cresa is javan then Cresa is blended. If someone is javan and lavish then they are prepaid. If someone is animal and javan then they are prepaid. Big, blended people are lavish. All animal people are unmodified. Cresa is blended.", "logic": "\nJavan(alena)\nUnmodified(alena)\nUnmodified(denis)\nPrepaid(denis)\nAnimal(denis)\nLavish(denis)\nBronchitic(denis)\nPrepaid(cresa)\nAnimal(cresa)\nBronchitic(cresa)\nforall x (Animal(x) -> Javan(x))\nJavan(cresa) -> Blended(cresa)\nforall x (Javan(x) and Lavish(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Animal(x) and Javan(x) -> Prepaid(x))\nforall x (Javan(x) and Blended(x) -> Lavish(x))\nforall x (Animal(x) -> Unmodified(x))\n\nBlended(cresa)\n\nAnimal(cresa) and forall x (Animal(x) -> Javan(x)) -> therefore Javan(cresa) Javan(cresa) and Javan(cresa) -> Blended(cresa) -> therefore Blended(cresa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Michell is clever. Michell is aestival. Samara is aestival. Samara is burly. Samara is bitter. Samara is botuliform. Samara is spunky. Pru is burly. Pru is bitter. Pru is spunky. All bitter people are clever. If Pru is clever then Pru is brumous. If someone is clever and botuliform then they are burly. If someone is bitter and clever then they are burly. Big, brumous people are botuliform. All bitter people are aestival. Pru is not brumous.", "logic": "\nClever(michell)\nAestival(michell)\nAestival(samara)\nBurly(samara)\nBitter(samara)\nBotuliform(samara)\nSpunky(samara)\nBurly(pru)\nBitter(pru)\nSpunky(pru)\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Clever(x))\nClever(pru) -> Brumous(pru)\nforall x (Clever(x) and Botuliform(x) -> Burly(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) and Clever(x) -> Burly(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) and Brumous(x) -> Botuliform(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) -> Aestival(x))\n\nnot Brumous(pru)\n\nBitter(pru) and forall x (Bitter(x) -> Clever(x)) -> therefore Clever(pru) Clever(pru) and Clever(pru) -> Brumous(pru) -> therefore Brumous(pru)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Midge is cross. Midge is tortuous. Orella is tortuous. Orella is unburied. Orella is mangy. Orella is goosy. Orella is downy. Randell is unburied. Randell is mangy. Randell is downy. All mangy people are cross. If Randell is cross then Randell is structural. If someone is cross and goosy then they are unburied. If someone is mangy and cross then they are unburied. Big, structural people are goosy. All mangy people are tortuous. Randell is goosy.", "logic": "\nCross(midge)\nTortuous(midge)\nTortuous(orella)\nUnburied(orella)\nMangy(orella)\nGoosy(orella)\nDowny(orella)\nUnburied(randell)\nMangy(randell)\nDowny(randell)\nforall x (Mangy(x) -> Cross(x))\nCross(randell) -> Structural(randell)\nforall x (Cross(x) and Goosy(x) -> Unburied(x))\nforall x (Mangy(x) and Cross(x) -> Unburied(x))\nforall x (Cross(x) and Structural(x) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Mangy(x) -> Tortuous(x))\n\nGoosy(randell)\n\nMangy(randell) and forall x (Mangy(x) -> Cross(x)) -> therefore Cross(randell) Mangy(randell) and forall x (Mangy(x) -> Cross(x)) -> therefore Cross(randell) Cross(randell) and Cross(randell) -> Structural(randell) -> therefore Structural(randell) Cross(randell) and Structural(randell) and forall x (Cross(x) and Structural(x) -> Goosy(x)) -> therefore Goosy(randell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Bride is ameban. Bride is enjoyable. Fonz is enjoyable. Fonz is favorite. Fonz is spartan. Fonz is unsmoothed. Fonz is cytolytic. Alanna is favorite. Alanna is spartan. Alanna is cytolytic. All spartan people are ameban. If Alanna is ameban then Alanna is mistakable. If someone is ameban and unsmoothed then they are favorite. If someone is spartan and ameban then they are favorite. Big, mistakable people are unsmoothed. All spartan people are enjoyable. Alanna is not unsmoothed.", "logic": "\nAmeban(bride)\nEnjoyable(bride)\nEnjoyable(fonz)\nFavorite(fonz)\nSpartan(fonz)\nUnsmoothed(fonz)\nCytolytic(fonz)\nFavorite(alanna)\nSpartan(alanna)\nCytolytic(alanna)\nforall x (Spartan(x) -> Ameban(x))\nAmeban(alanna) -> Mistakable(alanna)\nforall x (Ameban(x) and Unsmoothed(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Spartan(x) and Ameban(x) -> Favorite(x))\nforall x (Ameban(x) and Mistakable(x) -> Unsmoothed(x))\nforall x (Spartan(x) -> Enjoyable(x))\n\nnot Unsmoothed(alanna)\n\nSpartan(alanna) and forall x (Spartan(x) -> Ameban(x)) -> therefore Ameban(alanna) Spartan(alanna) and forall x (Spartan(x) -> Ameban(x)) -> therefore Ameban(alanna) Ameban(alanna) and Ameban(alanna) -> Mistakable(alanna) -> therefore Mistakable(alanna) Ameban(alanna) and Mistakable(alanna) and forall x (Ameban(x) and Mistakable(x) -> Unsmoothed(x)) -> therefore Unsmoothed(alanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Bernadine is cardinal. Bernadine is formed. Olivia is formed. Olivia is passable. Olivia is abkhazian. Olivia is empurpled. Olivia is vinous. Fedora is passable. Fedora is abkhazian. Fedora is vinous. All abkhazian people are cardinal. If Fedora is cardinal then Fedora is frostian. If someone is cardinal and empurpled then they are passable. If someone is abkhazian and cardinal then they are passable. Big, frostian people are empurpled. All abkhazian people are formed. Bernadine is not passable.", "logic": "\nCardinal(bernadine)\nFormed(bernadine)\nFormed(olivia)\nPassable(olivia)\nAbkhazian(olivia)\nEmpurpled(olivia)\nVinous(olivia)\nPassable(fedora)\nAbkhazian(fedora)\nVinous(fedora)\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Cardinal(x))\nCardinal(fedora) -> Frostian(fedora)\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Passable(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Cardinal(x) -> Passable(x))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Frostian(x) -> Empurpled(x))\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) -> Formed(x))\n\nnot Passable(bernadine)\n\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Empurpled(x) -> Passable(x)) <- forall x (Cardinal(x) and Frostian(x) -> Empurpled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Dana is utile. Dana is unpopular. Stevena is unpopular. Stevena is malted. Stevena is fired. Stevena is eighteenth. Stevena is splendid. Myrtia is malted. Myrtia is fired. Myrtia is splendid. All fired people are utile. If Myrtia is utile then Myrtia is wroth. If someone is utile and eighteenth then they are malted. If someone is fired and utile then they are malted. Big, wroth people are eighteenth. All fired people are unpopular. Dana is eighteenth.", "logic": "\nUtile(dana)\nUnpopular(dana)\nUnpopular(stevena)\nMalted(stevena)\nFired(stevena)\nEighteenth(stevena)\nSplendid(stevena)\nMalted(myrtia)\nFired(myrtia)\nSplendid(myrtia)\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Utile(x))\nUtile(myrtia) -> Wroth(myrtia)\nforall x (Utile(x) and Eighteenth(x) -> Malted(x))\nforall x (Fired(x) and Utile(x) -> Malted(x))\nforall x (Utile(x) and Wroth(x) -> Eighteenth(x))\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Unpopular(x))\n\nEighteenth(dana)\n\nforall x (Utile(x) and Wroth(x) -> Eighteenth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Cathryn is rimy. Cathryn is cresson. Karine is cresson. Karine is sepulchral. Karine is uncooked. Karine is hygienical. Karine is exegetical. Sandra is sepulchral. Sandra is uncooked. Sandra is exegetical. All uncooked people are rimy. If Sandra is rimy then Sandra is supreme. If someone is rimy and hygienical then they are sepulchral. If someone is uncooked and rimy then they are sepulchral. Big, supreme people are hygienical. All uncooked people are cresson. Cathryn is not supreme.", "logic": "\nRimy(cathryn)\nCresson(cathryn)\nCresson(karine)\nSepulchral(karine)\nUncooked(karine)\nHygienical(karine)\nExegetical(karine)\nSepulchral(sandra)\nUncooked(sandra)\nExegetical(sandra)\nforall x (Uncooked(x) -> Rimy(x))\nRimy(sandra) -> Supreme(sandra)\nforall x (Rimy(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nforall x (Uncooked(x) and Rimy(x) -> Sepulchral(x))\nforall x (Rimy(x) and Supreme(x) -> Hygienical(x))\nforall x (Uncooked(x) -> Cresson(x))\n\nnot Supreme(cathryn)\n\nnot Supreme(cathryn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Zelma is randomized. Zelma is myotonic. Nico is myotonic. Nico is monestrous. Nico is vinous. Nico is unfilmed. Nico is gerundial. Alfred is monestrous. Alfred is vinous. Alfred is gerundial. All vinous people are randomized. If Alfred is randomized then Alfred is aflame. If someone is randomized and unfilmed then they are monestrous. If someone is vinous and randomized then they are monestrous. Big, aflame people are unfilmed. All vinous people are myotonic. Zelma is vinous.", "logic": "\nRandomized(zelma)\nMyotonic(zelma)\nMyotonic(nico)\nMonestrous(nico)\nVinous(nico)\nUnfilmed(nico)\nGerundial(nico)\nMonestrous(alfred)\nVinous(alfred)\nGerundial(alfred)\nforall x (Vinous(x) -> Randomized(x))\nRandomized(alfred) -> Aflame(alfred)\nforall x (Randomized(x) and Unfilmed(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Vinous(x) and Randomized(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Randomized(x) and Aflame(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\nforall x (Vinous(x) -> Myotonic(x))\n\nVinous(zelma)\n\nVinous(zelma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Margarita is diminished. Margarita is nullified. Gene is nullified. Gene is unyielding. Gene is lowly. Gene is inexpiable. Gene is leaden. Scotti is unyielding. Scotti is lowly. Scotti is leaden. All lowly people are diminished. If Scotti is diminished then Scotti is monogamous. If someone is diminished and inexpiable then they are unyielding. If someone is lowly and diminished then they are unyielding. Big, monogamous people are inexpiable. All lowly people are nullified. Gene is not monogamous.", "logic": "\nDiminished(margarita)\nNullified(margarita)\nNullified(gene)\nUnyielding(gene)\nLowly(gene)\nInexpiable(gene)\nLeaden(gene)\nUnyielding(scotti)\nLowly(scotti)\nLeaden(scotti)\nforall x (Lowly(x) -> Diminished(x))\nDiminished(scotti) -> Monogamous(scotti)\nforall x (Diminished(x) and Inexpiable(x) -> Unyielding(x))\nforall x (Lowly(x) and Diminished(x) -> Unyielding(x))\nforall x (Diminished(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Inexpiable(x))\nforall x (Lowly(x) -> Nullified(x))\n\nnot Monogamous(gene)\n\nnot Monogamous(gene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "Janelle is tutorial. Janelle is overlooked. Becki is overlooked. Becki is untwisted. Becki is dantesque. Becki is twinning. Becki is aweless. Alf is untwisted. Alf is dantesque. Alf is aweless. All dantesque people are tutorial. If Alf is tutorial then Alf is enforced. If someone is tutorial and twinning then they are untwisted. If someone is dantesque and tutorial then they are untwisted. Big, enforced people are twinning. All dantesque people are overlooked. Janelle is aweless.", "logic": "\nTutorial(janelle)\nOverlooked(janelle)\nOverlooked(becki)\nUntwisted(becki)\nDantesque(becki)\nTwinning(becki)\nAweless(becki)\nUntwisted(alf)\nDantesque(alf)\nAweless(alf)\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Tutorial(x))\nTutorial(alf) -> Enforced(alf)\nforall x (Tutorial(x) and Twinning(x) -> Untwisted(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) and Tutorial(x) -> Untwisted(x))\nforall x (Tutorial(x) and Enforced(x) -> Twinning(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Overlooked(x))\n\nAweless(janelle)\n\nAweless(janelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1238"} {"premises": "The andrea near the kristyn. The kristyn speak the georgia. The ashleigh near the kristyn. The ashleigh speak the kristyn. The georgia is unionized. The georgia blackwash the ashleigh. The georgia speak the kristyn. If something is unionized then it speak the ashleigh. If something is disciform and pustulate then it near the andrea. If something is unionized and it speak the ashleigh then it near the georgia. If the georgia near the andrea and the georgia near the ashleigh then the ashleigh blackwash the andrea. If something blackwash the kristyn then it blackwash the andrea. If something speak the ashleigh and it near the georgia then it is fairish. The kristyn speak the georgia.", "logic": "\nNear(andrea, kristyn)\nSpeak(kristyn, georgia)\nNear(ashleigh, kristyn)\nSpeak(ashleigh, kristyn)\nUnionized(georgia)\nBlackwash(georgia, ashleigh)\nSpeak(georgia, kristyn)\nforall x (Unionized(x) -> Speak(x, ashleigh))\nforall x (Disciform(x) and Pustulate(x) -> Near(x, andrea))\nforall x (Unionized(x) and Speak(x, ashleigh) -> Near(x, georgia))\nNear(georgia, andrea) and Near(georgia, ashleigh) -> Blackwash(ashleigh, andrea)\nforall x (Blackwash(x, kristyn) -> Blackwash(x, andrea))\nforall x (Speak(x, ashleigh) and Near(x, georgia) -> Fairish(x))\n\nSpeak(kristyn, georgia)\n\ntherefore Speak(kristyn, georgia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The opalina plod the charla. The charla birl the nadean. The vachel plod the charla. The vachel birl the charla. The nadean is zonal. The nadean crawfish the vachel. The nadean birl the charla. If something is zonal then it birl the vachel. If something is boughed and creaky then it plod the opalina. If something is zonal and it birl the vachel then it plod the nadean. If the nadean plod the opalina and the nadean plod the vachel then the vachel crawfish the opalina. If something crawfish the charla then it crawfish the opalina. If something birl the vachel and it plod the nadean then it is multiplied. The vachel does not eat the charla.", "logic": "\nPlod(opalina, charla)\nBirl(charla, nadean)\nPlod(vachel, charla)\nBirl(vachel, charla)\nZonal(nadean)\nCrawfish(nadean, vachel)\nBirl(nadean, charla)\nforall x (Zonal(x) -> Birl(x, vachel))\nforall x (Boughed(x) and Creaky(x) -> Plod(x, opalina))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Birl(x, vachel) -> Plod(x, nadean))\nPlod(nadean, opalina) and Plod(nadean, vachel) -> Crawfish(vachel, opalina)\nforall x (Crawfish(x, charla) -> Crawfish(x, opalina))\nforall x (Birl(x, vachel) and Plod(x, nadean) -> Multiplied(x))\n\nnot Plod(vachel, charla)\n\ntherefore Plod(vachel, charla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The alla sustain the natalee. The natalee subvent the wilmette. The ritch sustain the natalee. The ritch subvent the natalee. The wilmette is flinty. The wilmette unthaw the ritch. The wilmette subvent the natalee. If something is flinty then it subvent the ritch. If something is enfeebling and crotchety then it sustain the alla. If something is flinty and it subvent the ritch then it sustain the wilmette. If the wilmette sustain the alla and the wilmette sustain the ritch then the ritch unthaw the alla. If something unthaw the natalee then it unthaw the alla. If something subvent the ritch and it sustain the wilmette then it is tertiary. The wilmette subvent the ritch.", "logic": "\nSustain(alla, natalee)\nSubvent(natalee, wilmette)\nSustain(ritch, natalee)\nSubvent(ritch, natalee)\nFlinty(wilmette)\nUnthaw(wilmette, ritch)\nSubvent(wilmette, natalee)\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Subvent(x, ritch))\nforall x (Enfeebling(x) and Crotchety(x) -> Sustain(x, alla))\nforall x (Flinty(x) and Subvent(x, ritch) -> Sustain(x, wilmette))\nSustain(wilmette, alla) and Sustain(wilmette, ritch) -> Unthaw(ritch, alla)\nforall x (Unthaw(x, natalee) -> Unthaw(x, alla))\nforall x (Subvent(x, ritch) and Sustain(x, wilmette) -> Tertiary(x))\n\nSubvent(wilmette, ritch)\n\nFlinty(wilmette) and forall x (Flinty(x) -> Subvent(x, ritch)) -> therefore Subvent(wilmette, ritch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The sibeal sweeten the evaleen. The evaleen stray the demetre. The lamb sweeten the evaleen. The lamb stray the evaleen. The demetre is charged. The demetre poetize the lamb. The demetre stray the evaleen. If something is charged then it stray the lamb. If something is bewitching and morbific then it sweeten the sibeal. If something is charged and it stray the lamb then it sweeten the demetre. If the demetre sweeten the sibeal and the demetre sweeten the lamb then the lamb poetize the sibeal. If something poetize the evaleen then it poetize the sibeal. If something stray the lamb and it sweeten the demetre then it is violent. The demetre does not need the lamb.", "logic": "\nSweeten(sibeal, evaleen)\nStray(evaleen, demetre)\nSweeten(lamb, evaleen)\nStray(lamb, evaleen)\nCharged(demetre)\nPoetize(demetre, lamb)\nStray(demetre, evaleen)\nforall x (Charged(x) -> Stray(x, lamb))\nforall x (Bewitching(x) and Morbific(x) -> Sweeten(x, sibeal))\nforall x (Charged(x) and Stray(x, lamb) -> Sweeten(x, demetre))\nSweeten(demetre, sibeal) and Sweeten(demetre, lamb) -> Poetize(lamb, sibeal)\nforall x (Poetize(x, evaleen) -> Poetize(x, sibeal))\nforall x (Stray(x, lamb) and Sweeten(x, demetre) -> Violent(x))\n\nnot Stray(demetre, lamb)\n\nCharged(demetre) and forall x (Charged(x) -> Stray(x, lamb)) -> therefore Stray(demetre, lamb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The tynan lustrate the aurlie. The aurlie arbitrate the lory. The marga lustrate the aurlie. The marga arbitrate the aurlie. The lory is enveloping. The lory coalesce the marga. The lory arbitrate the aurlie. If something is enveloping then it arbitrate the marga. If something is flash and diverse then it lustrate the tynan. If something is enveloping and it arbitrate the marga then it lustrate the lory. If the lory lustrate the tynan and the lory lustrate the marga then the marga coalesce the tynan. If something coalesce the aurlie then it coalesce the tynan. If something arbitrate the marga and it lustrate the lory then it is endogamic. The lory lustrate the lory.", "logic": "\nLustrate(tynan, aurlie)\nArbitrate(aurlie, lory)\nLustrate(marga, aurlie)\nArbitrate(marga, aurlie)\nEnveloping(lory)\nCoalesce(lory, marga)\nArbitrate(lory, aurlie)\nforall x (Enveloping(x) -> Arbitrate(x, marga))\nforall x (Flash(x) and Diverse(x) -> Lustrate(x, tynan))\nforall x (Enveloping(x) and Arbitrate(x, marga) -> Lustrate(x, lory))\nLustrate(lory, tynan) and Lustrate(lory, marga) -> Coalesce(marga, tynan)\nforall x (Coalesce(x, aurlie) -> Coalesce(x, tynan))\nforall x (Arbitrate(x, marga) and Lustrate(x, lory) -> Endogamic(x))\n\nLustrate(lory, lory)\n\nEnveloping(lory) and forall x (Enveloping(x) -> Arbitrate(x, marga)) -> therefore Arbitrate(lory, marga) Enveloping(lory) and Arbitrate(lory, marga) and forall x (Enveloping(x) and Arbitrate(x, marga) -> Lustrate(x, lory)) -> therefore Lustrate(lory, lory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The piper feud the chrissie. The chrissie dawdle the ninetta. The elvera feud the chrissie. The elvera dawdle the chrissie. The ninetta is inbuilt. The ninetta sorrow the elvera. The ninetta dawdle the chrissie. If something is inbuilt then it dawdle the elvera. If something is depressing and snazzy then it feud the piper. If something is inbuilt and it dawdle the elvera then it feud the ninetta. If the ninetta feud the piper and the ninetta feud the elvera then the elvera sorrow the piper. If something sorrow the chrissie then it sorrow the piper. If something dawdle the elvera and it feud the ninetta then it is exterior. The ninetta does not eat the ninetta.", "logic": "\nFeud(piper, chrissie)\nDawdle(chrissie, ninetta)\nFeud(elvera, chrissie)\nDawdle(elvera, chrissie)\nInbuilt(ninetta)\nSorrow(ninetta, elvera)\nDawdle(ninetta, chrissie)\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) -> Dawdle(x, elvera))\nforall x (Depressing(x) and Snazzy(x) -> Feud(x, piper))\nforall x (Inbuilt(x) and Dawdle(x, elvera) -> Feud(x, ninetta))\nFeud(ninetta, piper) and Feud(ninetta, elvera) -> Sorrow(elvera, piper)\nforall x (Sorrow(x, chrissie) -> Sorrow(x, piper))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, elvera) and Feud(x, ninetta) -> Exterior(x))\n\nnot Feud(ninetta, ninetta)\n\nInbuilt(ninetta) and forall x (Inbuilt(x) -> Dawdle(x, elvera)) -> therefore Dawdle(ninetta, elvera) Inbuilt(ninetta) and Dawdle(ninetta, elvera) and forall x (Inbuilt(x) and Dawdle(x, elvera) -> Feud(x, ninetta)) -> therefore Feud(ninetta, ninetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The sebastian muckrake the julieta. The julieta photostat the shirley. The hunter muckrake the julieta. The hunter photostat the julieta. The shirley is workable. The shirley intermarry the hunter. The shirley photostat the julieta. If something is workable then it photostat the hunter. If something is super and scapose then it muckrake the sebastian. If something is workable and it photostat the hunter then it muckrake the shirley. If the shirley muckrake the sebastian and the shirley muckrake the hunter then the hunter intermarry the sebastian. If something intermarry the julieta then it intermarry the sebastian. If something photostat the hunter and it muckrake the shirley then it is jolly. The shirley is jolly.", "logic": "\nMuckrake(sebastian, julieta)\nPhotostat(julieta, shirley)\nMuckrake(hunter, julieta)\nPhotostat(hunter, julieta)\nWorkable(shirley)\nIntermarry(shirley, hunter)\nPhotostat(shirley, julieta)\nforall x (Workable(x) -> Photostat(x, hunter))\nforall x (Super(x) and Scapose(x) -> Muckrake(x, sebastian))\nforall x (Workable(x) and Photostat(x, hunter) -> Muckrake(x, shirley))\nMuckrake(shirley, sebastian) and Muckrake(shirley, hunter) -> Intermarry(hunter, sebastian)\nforall x (Intermarry(x, julieta) -> Intermarry(x, sebastian))\nforall x (Photostat(x, hunter) and Muckrake(x, shirley) -> Jolly(x))\n\nJolly(shirley)\n\nWorkable(shirley) and forall x (Workable(x) -> Photostat(x, hunter)) -> therefore Photostat(shirley, hunter) Workable(shirley) and forall x (Workable(x) -> Photostat(x, hunter)) -> therefore Photostat(shirley, hunter) Workable(shirley) and Photostat(shirley, hunter) and forall x (Workable(x) and Photostat(x, hunter) -> Muckrake(x, shirley)) -> therefore Muckrake(shirley, shirley) Photostat(shirley, hunter) and Muckrake(shirley, shirley) and forall x (Photostat(x, hunter) and Muckrake(x, shirley) -> Jolly(x)) -> therefore Jolly(shirley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The cathrin ransack the melissa. The melissa gabble the vanny. The thorn ransack the melissa. The thorn gabble the melissa. The vanny is planted. The vanny resublime the thorn. The vanny gabble the melissa. If something is planted then it gabble the thorn. If something is cancellous and allied then it ransack the cathrin. If something is planted and it gabble the thorn then it ransack the vanny. If the vanny ransack the cathrin and the vanny ransack the thorn then the thorn resublime the cathrin. If something resublime the melissa then it resublime the cathrin. If something gabble the thorn and it ransack the vanny then it is unshelled. The vanny is not unshelled.", "logic": "\nRansack(cathrin, melissa)\nGabble(melissa, vanny)\nRansack(thorn, melissa)\nGabble(thorn, melissa)\nPlanted(vanny)\nResublime(vanny, thorn)\nGabble(vanny, melissa)\nforall x (Planted(x) -> Gabble(x, thorn))\nforall x (Cancellous(x) and Allied(x) -> Ransack(x, cathrin))\nforall x (Planted(x) and Gabble(x, thorn) -> Ransack(x, vanny))\nRansack(vanny, cathrin) and Ransack(vanny, thorn) -> Resublime(thorn, cathrin)\nforall x (Resublime(x, melissa) -> Resublime(x, cathrin))\nforall x (Gabble(x, thorn) and Ransack(x, vanny) -> Unshelled(x))\n\nnot Unshelled(vanny)\n\nPlanted(vanny) and forall x (Planted(x) -> Gabble(x, thorn)) -> therefore Gabble(vanny, thorn) Planted(vanny) and forall x (Planted(x) -> Gabble(x, thorn)) -> therefore Gabble(vanny, thorn) Planted(vanny) and Gabble(vanny, thorn) and forall x (Planted(x) and Gabble(x, thorn) -> Ransack(x, vanny)) -> therefore Ransack(vanny, vanny) Gabble(vanny, thorn) and Ransack(vanny, vanny) and forall x (Gabble(x, thorn) and Ransack(x, vanny) -> Unshelled(x)) -> therefore Unshelled(vanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The graig enrol the amara. The amara question the obie. The danica enrol the amara. The danica question the amara. The obie is incarnate. The obie fledge the danica. The obie question the amara. If something is incarnate then it question the danica. If something is asthenic and surging then it enrol the graig. If something is incarnate and it question the danica then it enrol the obie. If the obie enrol the graig and the obie enrol the danica then the danica fledge the graig. If something fledge the amara then it fledge the graig. If something question the danica and it enrol the obie then it is gauzy. The graig does not eat the obie.", "logic": "\nEnrol(graig, amara)\nQuestion(amara, obie)\nEnrol(danica, amara)\nQuestion(danica, amara)\nIncarnate(obie)\nFledge(obie, danica)\nQuestion(obie, amara)\nforall x (Incarnate(x) -> Question(x, danica))\nforall x (Asthenic(x) and Surging(x) -> Enrol(x, graig))\nforall x (Incarnate(x) and Question(x, danica) -> Enrol(x, obie))\nEnrol(obie, graig) and Enrol(obie, danica) -> Fledge(danica, graig)\nforall x (Fledge(x, amara) -> Fledge(x, graig))\nforall x (Question(x, danica) and Enrol(x, obie) -> Gauzy(x))\n\nnot Enrol(graig, obie)\n\nforall x (Incarnate(x) and Question(x, danica) -> Enrol(x, obie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The roosevelt estimate the nathaniel. The nathaniel evaporate the moises. The monah estimate the nathaniel. The monah evaporate the nathaniel. The moises is shielded. The moises update the monah. The moises evaporate the nathaniel. If something is shielded then it evaporate the monah. If something is intuitive and daredevil then it estimate the roosevelt. If something is shielded and it evaporate the monah then it estimate the moises. If the moises estimate the roosevelt and the moises estimate the monah then the monah update the roosevelt. If something update the nathaniel then it update the roosevelt. If something evaporate the monah and it estimate the moises then it is sham. The moises update the roosevelt.", "logic": "\nEstimate(roosevelt, nathaniel)\nEvaporate(nathaniel, moises)\nEstimate(monah, nathaniel)\nEvaporate(monah, nathaniel)\nShielded(moises)\nUpdate(moises, monah)\nEvaporate(moises, nathaniel)\nforall x (Shielded(x) -> Evaporate(x, monah))\nforall x (Intuitive(x) and Daredevil(x) -> Estimate(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Shielded(x) and Evaporate(x, monah) -> Estimate(x, moises))\nEstimate(moises, roosevelt) and Estimate(moises, monah) -> Update(monah, roosevelt)\nforall x (Update(x, nathaniel) -> Update(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Evaporate(x, monah) and Estimate(x, moises) -> Sham(x))\n\nUpdate(moises, roosevelt)\n\nforall x (Update(x, nathaniel) -> Update(x, roosevelt)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The gregorio reawaken the jenda. The jenda whisk the madona. The davina reawaken the jenda. The davina whisk the jenda. The madona is unportable. The madona turtle the davina. The madona whisk the jenda. If something is unportable then it whisk the davina. If something is nestled and ctenoid then it reawaken the gregorio. If something is unportable and it whisk the davina then it reawaken the madona. If the madona reawaken the gregorio and the madona reawaken the davina then the davina turtle the gregorio. If something turtle the jenda then it turtle the gregorio. If something whisk the davina and it reawaken the madona then it is parhelic. The gregorio does not need the davina.", "logic": "\nReawaken(gregorio, jenda)\nWhisk(jenda, madona)\nReawaken(davina, jenda)\nWhisk(davina, jenda)\nUnportable(madona)\nTurtle(madona, davina)\nWhisk(madona, jenda)\nforall x (Unportable(x) -> Whisk(x, davina))\nforall x (Nestled(x) and Ctenoid(x) -> Reawaken(x, gregorio))\nforall x (Unportable(x) and Whisk(x, davina) -> Reawaken(x, madona))\nReawaken(madona, gregorio) and Reawaken(madona, davina) -> Turtle(davina, gregorio)\nforall x (Turtle(x, jenda) -> Turtle(x, gregorio))\nforall x (Whisk(x, davina) and Reawaken(x, madona) -> Parhelic(x))\n\nnot Whisk(gregorio, davina)\n\nforall x (Unportable(x) -> Whisk(x, davina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The demetre commune the vite. The vite convect the sandie. The chet commune the vite. The chet convect the vite. The sandie is sapiens. The sandie decimalize the chet. The sandie convect the vite. If something is sapiens then it convect the chet. If something is undried and suborbital then it commune the demetre. If something is sapiens and it convect the chet then it commune the sandie. If the sandie commune the demetre and the sandie commune the chet then the chet decimalize the demetre. If something decimalize the vite then it decimalize the demetre. If something convect the chet and it commune the sandie then it is hoary. The vite commune the sandie.", "logic": "\nCommune(demetre, vite)\nConvect(vite, sandie)\nCommune(chet, vite)\nConvect(chet, vite)\nSapiens(sandie)\nDecimalize(sandie, chet)\nConvect(sandie, vite)\nforall x (Sapiens(x) -> Convect(x, chet))\nforall x (Undried(x) and Suborbital(x) -> Commune(x, demetre))\nforall x (Sapiens(x) and Convect(x, chet) -> Commune(x, sandie))\nCommune(sandie, demetre) and Commune(sandie, chet) -> Decimalize(chet, demetre)\nforall x (Decimalize(x, vite) -> Decimalize(x, demetre))\nforall x (Convect(x, chet) and Commune(x, sandie) -> Hoary(x))\n\nCommune(vite, sandie)\n\nforall x (Sapiens(x) and Convect(x, chet) -> Commune(x, sandie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The worth furrow the melisse. The melisse disbud the lynde. The evangelia furrow the melisse. The evangelia disbud the melisse. The lynde is deficient. The lynde finger the evangelia. The lynde disbud the melisse. If something is deficient then it disbud the evangelia. If something is navigable and fatalist then it furrow the worth. If something is deficient and it disbud the evangelia then it furrow the lynde. If the lynde furrow the worth and the lynde furrow the evangelia then the evangelia finger the worth. If something finger the melisse then it finger the worth. If something disbud the evangelia and it furrow the lynde then it is boss. The melisse is not navigable.", "logic": "\nFurrow(worth, melisse)\nDisbud(melisse, lynde)\nFurrow(evangelia, melisse)\nDisbud(evangelia, melisse)\nDeficient(lynde)\nFinger(lynde, evangelia)\nDisbud(lynde, melisse)\nforall x (Deficient(x) -> Disbud(x, evangelia))\nforall x (Navigable(x) and Fatalist(x) -> Furrow(x, worth))\nforall x (Deficient(x) and Disbud(x, evangelia) -> Furrow(x, lynde))\nFurrow(lynde, worth) and Furrow(lynde, evangelia) -> Finger(evangelia, worth)\nforall x (Finger(x, melisse) -> Finger(x, worth))\nforall x (Disbud(x, evangelia) and Furrow(x, lynde) -> Boss(x))\n\nnot Navigable(melisse)\n\nnot Navigable(melisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The wilton unbalance the phillipp. The phillipp deaminate the sven. The ulrica unbalance the phillipp. The ulrica deaminate the phillipp. The sven is ethnologic. The sven vaporize the ulrica. The sven deaminate the phillipp. If something is ethnologic then it deaminate the ulrica. If something is apterous and unlobed then it unbalance the wilton. If something is ethnologic and it deaminate the ulrica then it unbalance the sven. If the sven unbalance the wilton and the sven unbalance the ulrica then the ulrica vaporize the wilton. If something vaporize the phillipp then it vaporize the wilton. If something deaminate the ulrica and it unbalance the sven then it is zealous. The phillipp deaminate the phillipp.", "logic": "\nUnbalance(wilton, phillipp)\nDeaminate(phillipp, sven)\nUnbalance(ulrica, phillipp)\nDeaminate(ulrica, phillipp)\nEthnologic(sven)\nVaporize(sven, ulrica)\nDeaminate(sven, phillipp)\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> Deaminate(x, ulrica))\nforall x (Apterous(x) and Unlobed(x) -> Unbalance(x, wilton))\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) and Deaminate(x, ulrica) -> Unbalance(x, sven))\nUnbalance(sven, wilton) and Unbalance(sven, ulrica) -> Vaporize(ulrica, wilton)\nforall x (Vaporize(x, phillipp) -> Vaporize(x, wilton))\nforall x (Deaminate(x, ulrica) and Unbalance(x, sven) -> Zealous(x))\n\nDeaminate(phillipp, phillipp)\n\nDeaminate(phillipp, phillipp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The marvin ostentate the adolphe. The adolphe solvate the leora. The zacharia ostentate the adolphe. The zacharia solvate the adolphe. The leora is applied. The leora reassail the zacharia. The leora solvate the adolphe. If something is applied then it solvate the zacharia. If something is isothermic and abroad then it ostentate the marvin. If something is applied and it solvate the zacharia then it ostentate the leora. If the leora ostentate the marvin and the leora ostentate the zacharia then the zacharia reassail the marvin. If something reassail the adolphe then it reassail the marvin. If something solvate the zacharia and it ostentate the leora then it is untapped. The adolphe is not kind.", "logic": "\nOstentate(marvin, adolphe)\nSolvate(adolphe, leora)\nOstentate(zacharia, adolphe)\nSolvate(zacharia, adolphe)\nApplied(leora)\nReassail(leora, zacharia)\nSolvate(leora, adolphe)\nforall x (Applied(x) -> Solvate(x, zacharia))\nforall x (Isothermic(x) and Abroad(x) -> Ostentate(x, marvin))\nforall x (Applied(x) and Solvate(x, zacharia) -> Ostentate(x, leora))\nOstentate(leora, marvin) and Ostentate(leora, zacharia) -> Reassail(zacharia, marvin)\nforall x (Reassail(x, adolphe) -> Reassail(x, marvin))\nforall x (Solvate(x, zacharia) and Ostentate(x, leora) -> Untapped(x))\n\nnot Kind(adolphe)\n\nnot Kind(adolphe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The noreen blast the eada. The eada flit the urbain. The alexis blast the eada. The alexis flit the eada. The urbain is coequal. The urbain cower the alexis. The urbain flit the eada. If something is coequal then it flit the alexis. If something is bursiform and fuzzed then it blast the noreen. If something is coequal and it flit the alexis then it blast the urbain. If the urbain blast the noreen and the urbain blast the alexis then the alexis cower the noreen. If something cower the eada then it cower the noreen. If something flit the alexis and it blast the urbain then it is elected. The noreen flit the noreen.", "logic": "\nBlast(noreen, eada)\nFlit(eada, urbain)\nBlast(alexis, eada)\nFlit(alexis, eada)\nCoequal(urbain)\nCower(urbain, alexis)\nFlit(urbain, eada)\nforall x (Coequal(x) -> Flit(x, alexis))\nforall x (Bursiform(x) and Fuzzed(x) -> Blast(x, noreen))\nforall x (Coequal(x) and Flit(x, alexis) -> Blast(x, urbain))\nBlast(urbain, noreen) and Blast(urbain, alexis) -> Cower(alexis, noreen)\nforall x (Cower(x, eada) -> Cower(x, noreen))\nforall x (Flit(x, alexis) and Blast(x, urbain) -> Elected(x))\n\nFlit(noreen, noreen)\n\nFlit(noreen, noreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1531"} {"premises": "The greta does not visit the trudy. The june extricate the oralee. The oralee fluoresce the greta. The trudy augur the june. If the oralee extricate the june and the june augur the greta then the oralee does not see the greta. If someone is mixed then they need the june. If someone extricate the trudy then they see the oralee. If someone fluoresce the june and they need the oralee then they do not see the oralee. If someone fluoresce the greta then they see the oralee. If someone augur the oralee then the oralee is mixed. If someone is mixed then they visit the trudy. If someone is vicarious and they see the trudy then the trudy extricate the oralee. The trudy augur the june.", "logic": "\nnot Fluoresce(greta, trudy)\nExtricate(june, oralee)\nFluoresce(oralee, greta)\nAugur(trudy, june)\nExtricate(oralee, june) and Augur(june, greta) -> not Augur(oralee, greta)\nforall x (Mixed(x) -> Extricate(x, june))\nforall x (Extricate(x, trudy) -> Augur(x, oralee))\nforall x (Fluoresce(x, june) and Extricate(x, oralee) -> not Augur(x, oralee))\nforall x (Fluoresce(x, greta) -> Augur(x, oralee))\nforall x (Augur(x, oralee) -> Mixed(oralee))\nforall x (Mixed(x) -> Fluoresce(x, trudy))\nforall x (Vicarious(x) and Augur(x, trudy) -> Extricate(trudy, oralee))\n\nAugur(trudy, june)\n\ntherefore Augur(trudy, june)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The mirna does not visit the elmira. The win barbarise the oneida. The oneida resume the mirna. The elmira pour the win. If the oneida barbarise the win and the win pour the mirna then the oneida does not see the mirna. If someone is telescoped then they need the win. If someone barbarise the elmira then they see the oneida. If someone resume the win and they need the oneida then they do not see the oneida. If someone resume the mirna then they see the oneida. If someone pour the oneida then the oneida is telescoped. If someone is telescoped then they visit the elmira. If someone is barky and they see the elmira then the elmira barbarise the oneida. The elmira does not see the win.", "logic": "\nnot Resume(mirna, elmira)\nBarbarise(win, oneida)\nResume(oneida, mirna)\nPour(elmira, win)\nBarbarise(oneida, win) and Pour(win, mirna) -> not Pour(oneida, mirna)\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Barbarise(x, win))\nforall x (Barbarise(x, elmira) -> Pour(x, oneida))\nforall x (Resume(x, win) and Barbarise(x, oneida) -> not Pour(x, oneida))\nforall x (Resume(x, mirna) -> Pour(x, oneida))\nforall x (Pour(x, oneida) -> Telescoped(oneida))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Resume(x, elmira))\nforall x (Barky(x) and Pour(x, elmira) -> Barbarise(elmira, oneida))\n\nnot Pour(elmira, win)\n\ntherefore Pour(elmira, win)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The ambrose does not visit the iain. The ann recompense the timotheus. The timotheus escallop the ambrose. The iain coddle the ann. If the timotheus recompense the ann and the ann coddle the ambrose then the timotheus does not see the ambrose. If someone is adaptable then they need the ann. If someone recompense the iain then they see the timotheus. If someone escallop the ann and they need the timotheus then they do not see the timotheus. If someone escallop the ambrose then they see the timotheus. If someone coddle the timotheus then the timotheus is adaptable. If someone is adaptable then they visit the iain. If someone is goofy and they see the iain then the iain recompense the timotheus. The timotheus coddle the timotheus.", "logic": "\nnot Escallop(ambrose, iain)\nRecompense(ann, timotheus)\nEscallop(timotheus, ambrose)\nCoddle(iain, ann)\nRecompense(timotheus, ann) and Coddle(ann, ambrose) -> not Coddle(timotheus, ambrose)\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Recompense(x, ann))\nforall x (Recompense(x, iain) -> Coddle(x, timotheus))\nforall x (Escallop(x, ann) and Recompense(x, timotheus) -> not Coddle(x, timotheus))\nforall x (Escallop(x, ambrose) -> Coddle(x, timotheus))\nforall x (Coddle(x, timotheus) -> Adaptable(timotheus))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Escallop(x, iain))\nforall x (Goofy(x) and Coddle(x, iain) -> Recompense(iain, timotheus))\n\nCoddle(timotheus, timotheus)\n\nEscallop(timotheus, ambrose) and forall x (Escallop(x, ambrose) -> Coddle(x, timotheus)) -> therefore Coddle(timotheus, timotheus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The priscella does not visit the alford. The moss succeed the oleg. The oleg bale the priscella. The alford capsulise the moss. If the oleg succeed the moss and the moss capsulise the priscella then the oleg does not see the priscella. If someone is rustless then they need the moss. If someone succeed the alford then they see the oleg. If someone bale the moss and they need the oleg then they do not see the oleg. If someone bale the priscella then they see the oleg. If someone capsulise the oleg then the oleg is rustless. If someone is rustless then they visit the alford. If someone is heavenly and they see the alford then the alford succeed the oleg. The oleg does not see the oleg.", "logic": "\nnot Bale(priscella, alford)\nSucceed(moss, oleg)\nBale(oleg, priscella)\nCapsulise(alford, moss)\nSucceed(oleg, moss) and Capsulise(moss, priscella) -> not Capsulise(oleg, priscella)\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Succeed(x, moss))\nforall x (Succeed(x, alford) -> Capsulise(x, oleg))\nforall x (Bale(x, moss) and Succeed(x, oleg) -> not Capsulise(x, oleg))\nforall x (Bale(x, priscella) -> Capsulise(x, oleg))\nforall x (Capsulise(x, oleg) -> Rustless(oleg))\nforall x (Rustless(x) -> Bale(x, alford))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) and Capsulise(x, alford) -> Succeed(alford, oleg))\n\nnot Capsulise(oleg, oleg)\n\nBale(oleg, priscella) and forall x (Bale(x, priscella) -> Capsulise(x, oleg)) -> therefore Capsulise(oleg, oleg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The mark does not visit the thomasa. The pauletta patinise the alberta. The alberta tithe the mark. The thomasa foray the pauletta. If the alberta patinise the pauletta and the pauletta foray the mark then the alberta does not see the mark. If someone is mitotic then they need the pauletta. If someone patinise the thomasa then they see the alberta. If someone tithe the pauletta and they need the alberta then they do not see the alberta. If someone tithe the mark then they see the alberta. If someone foray the alberta then the alberta is mitotic. If someone is mitotic then they visit the thomasa. If someone is hazel and they see the thomasa then the thomasa patinise the alberta. The alberta is mitotic.", "logic": "\nnot Tithe(mark, thomasa)\nPatinise(pauletta, alberta)\nTithe(alberta, mark)\nForay(thomasa, pauletta)\nPatinise(alberta, pauletta) and Foray(pauletta, mark) -> not Foray(alberta, mark)\nforall x (Mitotic(x) -> Patinise(x, pauletta))\nforall x (Patinise(x, thomasa) -> Foray(x, alberta))\nforall x (Tithe(x, pauletta) and Patinise(x, alberta) -> not Foray(x, alberta))\nforall x (Tithe(x, mark) -> Foray(x, alberta))\nforall x (Foray(x, alberta) -> Mitotic(alberta))\nforall x (Mitotic(x) -> Tithe(x, thomasa))\nforall x (Hazel(x) and Foray(x, thomasa) -> Patinise(thomasa, alberta))\n\nMitotic(alberta)\n\nTithe(alberta, mark) and forall x (Tithe(x, mark) -> Foray(x, alberta)) -> therefore Foray(alberta, alberta) Foray(alberta, alberta) and forall x (Foray(x, alberta) -> Mitotic(alberta)) -> therefore Mitotic(alberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The hagan does not visit the sid. The winna lyophilize the katleen. The katleen gesture the hagan. The sid score the winna. If the katleen lyophilize the winna and the winna score the hagan then the katleen does not see the hagan. If someone is ulnar then they need the winna. If someone lyophilize the sid then they see the katleen. If someone gesture the winna and they need the katleen then they do not see the katleen. If someone gesture the hagan then they see the katleen. If someone score the katleen then the katleen is ulnar. If someone is ulnar then they visit the sid. If someone is nipponese and they see the sid then the sid lyophilize the katleen. The katleen is not ulnar.", "logic": "\nnot Gesture(hagan, sid)\nLyophilize(winna, katleen)\nGesture(katleen, hagan)\nScore(sid, winna)\nLyophilize(katleen, winna) and Score(winna, hagan) -> not Score(katleen, hagan)\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Lyophilize(x, winna))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, sid) -> Score(x, katleen))\nforall x (Gesture(x, winna) and Lyophilize(x, katleen) -> not Score(x, katleen))\nforall x (Gesture(x, hagan) -> Score(x, katleen))\nforall x (Score(x, katleen) -> Ulnar(katleen))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Gesture(x, sid))\nforall x (Nipponese(x) and Score(x, sid) -> Lyophilize(sid, katleen))\n\nnot Ulnar(katleen)\n\nGesture(katleen, hagan) and forall x (Gesture(x, hagan) -> Score(x, katleen)) -> therefore Score(katleen, katleen) Score(katleen, katleen) and forall x (Score(x, katleen) -> Ulnar(katleen)) -> therefore Ulnar(katleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The cybill does not visit the constancy. The anitra forsake the lottie. The lottie riff the cybill. The constancy symphonize the anitra. If the lottie forsake the anitra and the anitra symphonize the cybill then the lottie does not see the cybill. If someone is rotten then they need the anitra. If someone forsake the constancy then they see the lottie. If someone riff the anitra and they need the lottie then they do not see the lottie. If someone riff the cybill then they see the lottie. If someone symphonize the lottie then the lottie is rotten. If someone is rotten then they visit the constancy. If someone is snub and they see the constancy then the constancy forsake the lottie. The lottie forsake the anitra.", "logic": "\nnot Riff(cybill, constancy)\nForsake(anitra, lottie)\nRiff(lottie, cybill)\nSymphonize(constancy, anitra)\nForsake(lottie, anitra) and Symphonize(anitra, cybill) -> not Symphonize(lottie, cybill)\nforall x (Rotten(x) -> Forsake(x, anitra))\nforall x (Forsake(x, constancy) -> Symphonize(x, lottie))\nforall x (Riff(x, anitra) and Forsake(x, lottie) -> not Symphonize(x, lottie))\nforall x (Riff(x, cybill) -> Symphonize(x, lottie))\nforall x (Symphonize(x, lottie) -> Rotten(lottie))\nforall x (Rotten(x) -> Riff(x, constancy))\nforall x (Snub(x) and Symphonize(x, constancy) -> Forsake(constancy, lottie))\n\nForsake(lottie, anitra)\n\nRiff(lottie, cybill) and forall x (Riff(x, cybill) -> Symphonize(x, lottie)) -> therefore Symphonize(lottie, lottie) Symphonize(lottie, lottie) and forall x (Symphonize(x, lottie) -> Rotten(lottie)) -> therefore Rotten(lottie) Rotten(lottie) and forall x (Rotten(x) -> Forsake(x, anitra)) -> therefore Forsake(lottie, anitra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The kristina does not visit the trudie. The mireille readapt the stevy. The stevy facsimile the kristina. The trudie delouse the mireille. If the stevy readapt the mireille and the mireille delouse the kristina then the stevy does not see the kristina. If someone is undesigned then they need the mireille. If someone readapt the trudie then they see the stevy. If someone facsimile the mireille and they need the stevy then they do not see the stevy. If someone facsimile the kristina then they see the stevy. If someone delouse the stevy then the stevy is undesigned. If someone is undesigned then they visit the trudie. If someone is prenominal and they see the trudie then the trudie readapt the stevy. The stevy does not need the mireille.", "logic": "\nnot Facsimile(kristina, trudie)\nReadapt(mireille, stevy)\nFacsimile(stevy, kristina)\nDelouse(trudie, mireille)\nReadapt(stevy, mireille) and Delouse(mireille, kristina) -> not Delouse(stevy, kristina)\nforall x (Undesigned(x) -> Readapt(x, mireille))\nforall x (Readapt(x, trudie) -> Delouse(x, stevy))\nforall x (Facsimile(x, mireille) and Readapt(x, stevy) -> not Delouse(x, stevy))\nforall x (Facsimile(x, kristina) -> Delouse(x, stevy))\nforall x (Delouse(x, stevy) -> Undesigned(stevy))\nforall x (Undesigned(x) -> Facsimile(x, trudie))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) and Delouse(x, trudie) -> Readapt(trudie, stevy))\n\nnot Readapt(stevy, mireille)\n\nFacsimile(stevy, kristina) and forall x (Facsimile(x, kristina) -> Delouse(x, stevy)) -> therefore Delouse(stevy, stevy) Delouse(stevy, stevy) and forall x (Delouse(x, stevy) -> Undesigned(stevy)) -> therefore Undesigned(stevy) Undesigned(stevy) and forall x (Undesigned(x) -> Readapt(x, mireille)) -> therefore Readapt(stevy, mireille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The aloysia does not visit the denise. The mischa inhume the joycelin. The joycelin cavort the aloysia. The denise irradiate the mischa. If the joycelin inhume the mischa and the mischa irradiate the aloysia then the joycelin does not see the aloysia. If someone is licit then they need the mischa. If someone inhume the denise then they see the joycelin. If someone cavort the mischa and they need the joycelin then they do not see the joycelin. If someone cavort the aloysia then they see the joycelin. If someone irradiate the joycelin then the joycelin is licit. If someone is licit then they visit the denise. If someone is flash and they see the denise then the denise inhume the joycelin. The aloysia does not need the mischa.", "logic": "\nnot Cavort(aloysia, denise)\nInhume(mischa, joycelin)\nCavort(joycelin, aloysia)\nIrradiate(denise, mischa)\nInhume(joycelin, mischa) and Irradiate(mischa, aloysia) -> not Irradiate(joycelin, aloysia)\nforall x (Licit(x) -> Inhume(x, mischa))\nforall x (Inhume(x, denise) -> Irradiate(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Cavort(x, mischa) and Inhume(x, joycelin) -> not Irradiate(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Cavort(x, aloysia) -> Irradiate(x, joycelin))\nforall x (Irradiate(x, joycelin) -> Licit(joycelin))\nforall x (Licit(x) -> Cavort(x, denise))\nforall x (Flash(x) and Irradiate(x, denise) -> Inhume(denise, joycelin))\n\nnot Inhume(aloysia, mischa)\n\nforall x (Licit(x) -> Inhume(x, mischa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The sheba does not visit the karissa. The leone trephine the bambi. The bambi gamble the sheba. The karissa haul the leone. If the bambi trephine the leone and the leone haul the sheba then the bambi does not see the sheba. If someone is alluvial then they need the leone. If someone trephine the karissa then they see the bambi. If someone gamble the leone and they need the bambi then they do not see the bambi. If someone gamble the sheba then they see the bambi. If someone haul the bambi then the bambi is alluvial. If someone is alluvial then they visit the karissa. If someone is gushing and they see the karissa then the karissa trephine the bambi. The karissa haul the bambi.", "logic": "\nnot Gamble(sheba, karissa)\nTrephine(leone, bambi)\nGamble(bambi, sheba)\nHaul(karissa, leone)\nTrephine(bambi, leone) and Haul(leone, sheba) -> not Haul(bambi, sheba)\nforall x (Alluvial(x) -> Trephine(x, leone))\nforall x (Trephine(x, karissa) -> Haul(x, bambi))\nforall x (Gamble(x, leone) and Trephine(x, bambi) -> not Haul(x, bambi))\nforall x (Gamble(x, sheba) -> Haul(x, bambi))\nforall x (Haul(x, bambi) -> Alluvial(bambi))\nforall x (Alluvial(x) -> Gamble(x, karissa))\nforall x (Gushing(x) and Haul(x, karissa) -> Trephine(karissa, bambi))\n\nHaul(karissa, bambi)\n\nforall x (Trephine(x, karissa) -> Haul(x, bambi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The spike does not visit the kimmy. The rich junk the yard. The yard file the spike. The kimmy bayonet the rich. If the yard junk the rich and the rich bayonet the spike then the yard does not see the spike. If someone is cosmetic then they need the rich. If someone junk the kimmy then they see the yard. If someone file the rich and they need the yard then they do not see the yard. If someone file the spike then they see the yard. If someone bayonet the yard then the yard is cosmetic. If someone is cosmetic then they visit the kimmy. If someone is sudden and they see the kimmy then the kimmy junk the yard. The kimmy does not need the yard.", "logic": "\nnot File(spike, kimmy)\nJunk(rich, yard)\nFile(yard, spike)\nBayonet(kimmy, rich)\nJunk(yard, rich) and Bayonet(rich, spike) -> not Bayonet(yard, spike)\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) -> Junk(x, rich))\nforall x (Junk(x, kimmy) -> Bayonet(x, yard))\nforall x (File(x, rich) and Junk(x, yard) -> not Bayonet(x, yard))\nforall x (File(x, spike) -> Bayonet(x, yard))\nforall x (Bayonet(x, yard) -> Cosmetic(yard))\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) -> File(x, kimmy))\nforall x (Sudden(x) and Bayonet(x, kimmy) -> Junk(kimmy, yard))\n\nnot Junk(kimmy, yard)\n\nforall x (Sudden(x) and Bayonet(x, kimmy) -> Junk(kimmy, yard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The giavani does not visit the rafaelia. The shayna prosecute the rey. The rey elapse the giavani. The rafaelia denudate the shayna. If the rey prosecute the shayna and the shayna denudate the giavani then the rey does not see the giavani. If someone is demanding then they need the shayna. If someone prosecute the rafaelia then they see the rey. If someone elapse the shayna and they need the rey then they do not see the rey. If someone elapse the giavani then they see the rey. If someone denudate the rey then the rey is demanding. If someone is demanding then they visit the rafaelia. If someone is nebulous and they see the rafaelia then the rafaelia prosecute the rey. The shayna elapse the rafaelia.", "logic": "\nnot Elapse(giavani, rafaelia)\nProsecute(shayna, rey)\nElapse(rey, giavani)\nDenudate(rafaelia, shayna)\nProsecute(rey, shayna) and Denudate(shayna, giavani) -> not Denudate(rey, giavani)\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Prosecute(x, shayna))\nforall x (Prosecute(x, rafaelia) -> Denudate(x, rey))\nforall x (Elapse(x, shayna) and Prosecute(x, rey) -> not Denudate(x, rey))\nforall x (Elapse(x, giavani) -> Denudate(x, rey))\nforall x (Denudate(x, rey) -> Demanding(rey))\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Elapse(x, rafaelia))\nforall x (Nebulous(x) and Denudate(x, rafaelia) -> Prosecute(rafaelia, rey))\n\nElapse(shayna, rafaelia)\n\nforall x (Demanding(x) -> Elapse(x, rafaelia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The norry does not visit the fremont. The dinny lend the evelina. The evelina devil the norry. The fremont attorn the dinny. If the evelina lend the dinny and the dinny attorn the norry then the evelina does not see the norry. If someone is tinpot then they need the dinny. If someone lend the fremont then they see the evelina. If someone devil the dinny and they need the evelina then they do not see the evelina. If someone devil the norry then they see the evelina. If someone attorn the evelina then the evelina is tinpot. If someone is tinpot then they visit the fremont. If someone is undefended and they see the fremont then the fremont lend the evelina. The dinny is not undefended.", "logic": "\nnot Devil(norry, fremont)\nLend(dinny, evelina)\nDevil(evelina, norry)\nAttorn(fremont, dinny)\nLend(evelina, dinny) and Attorn(dinny, norry) -> not Attorn(evelina, norry)\nforall x (Tinpot(x) -> Lend(x, dinny))\nforall x (Lend(x, fremont) -> Attorn(x, evelina))\nforall x (Devil(x, dinny) and Lend(x, evelina) -> not Attorn(x, evelina))\nforall x (Devil(x, norry) -> Attorn(x, evelina))\nforall x (Attorn(x, evelina) -> Tinpot(evelina))\nforall x (Tinpot(x) -> Devil(x, fremont))\nforall x (Undefended(x) and Attorn(x, fremont) -> Lend(fremont, evelina))\n\nnot Undefended(dinny)\n\nnot Undefended(dinny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The donetta does not visit the conroy. The roni twaddle the tadd. The tadd chaff the donetta. The conroy discolor the roni. If the tadd twaddle the roni and the roni discolor the donetta then the tadd does not see the donetta. If someone is corky then they need the roni. If someone twaddle the conroy then they see the tadd. If someone chaff the roni and they need the tadd then they do not see the tadd. If someone chaff the donetta then they see the tadd. If someone discolor the tadd then the tadd is corky. If someone is corky then they visit the conroy. If someone is hopeless and they see the conroy then the conroy twaddle the tadd. The roni chaff the roni.", "logic": "\nnot Chaff(donetta, conroy)\nTwaddle(roni, tadd)\nChaff(tadd, donetta)\nDiscolor(conroy, roni)\nTwaddle(tadd, roni) and Discolor(roni, donetta) -> not Discolor(tadd, donetta)\nforall x (Corky(x) -> Twaddle(x, roni))\nforall x (Twaddle(x, conroy) -> Discolor(x, tadd))\nforall x (Chaff(x, roni) and Twaddle(x, tadd) -> not Discolor(x, tadd))\nforall x (Chaff(x, donetta) -> Discolor(x, tadd))\nforall x (Discolor(x, tadd) -> Corky(tadd))\nforall x (Corky(x) -> Chaff(x, conroy))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) and Discolor(x, conroy) -> Twaddle(conroy, tadd))\n\nChaff(roni, roni)\n\nChaff(roni, roni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The kesley does not visit the camila. The kate upload the cecilla. The cecilla pressurise the kesley. The camila solicit the kate. If the cecilla upload the kate and the kate solicit the kesley then the cecilla does not see the kesley. If someone is foremost then they need the kate. If someone upload the camila then they see the cecilla. If someone pressurise the kate and they need the cecilla then they do not see the cecilla. If someone pressurise the kesley then they see the cecilla. If someone solicit the cecilla then the cecilla is foremost. If someone is foremost then they visit the camila. If someone is prosy and they see the camila then the camila upload the cecilla. The kesley is not foremost.", "logic": "\nnot Pressurise(kesley, camila)\nUpload(kate, cecilla)\nPressurise(cecilla, kesley)\nSolicit(camila, kate)\nUpload(cecilla, kate) and Solicit(kate, kesley) -> not Solicit(cecilla, kesley)\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Upload(x, kate))\nforall x (Upload(x, camila) -> Solicit(x, cecilla))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, kate) and Upload(x, cecilla) -> not Solicit(x, cecilla))\nforall x (Pressurise(x, kesley) -> Solicit(x, cecilla))\nforall x (Solicit(x, cecilla) -> Foremost(cecilla))\nforall x (Foremost(x) -> Pressurise(x, camila))\nforall x (Prosy(x) and Solicit(x, camila) -> Upload(camila, cecilla))\n\nnot Foremost(kesley)\n\nnot Foremost(kesley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The gwyneth does not visit the vito. The dinny sober the raymundo. The raymundo outplay the gwyneth. The vito dish the dinny. If the raymundo sober the dinny and the dinny dish the gwyneth then the raymundo does not see the gwyneth. If someone is keeled then they need the dinny. If someone sober the vito then they see the raymundo. If someone outplay the dinny and they need the raymundo then they do not see the raymundo. If someone outplay the gwyneth then they see the raymundo. If someone dish the raymundo then the raymundo is keeled. If someone is keeled then they visit the vito. If someone is botonnee and they see the vito then the vito sober the raymundo. The raymundo sober the raymundo.", "logic": "\nnot Outplay(gwyneth, vito)\nSober(dinny, raymundo)\nOutplay(raymundo, gwyneth)\nDish(vito, dinny)\nSober(raymundo, dinny) and Dish(dinny, gwyneth) -> not Dish(raymundo, gwyneth)\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Sober(x, dinny))\nforall x (Sober(x, vito) -> Dish(x, raymundo))\nforall x (Outplay(x, dinny) and Sober(x, raymundo) -> not Dish(x, raymundo))\nforall x (Outplay(x, gwyneth) -> Dish(x, raymundo))\nforall x (Dish(x, raymundo) -> Keeled(raymundo))\nforall x (Keeled(x) -> Outplay(x, vito))\nforall x (Botonnee(x) and Dish(x, vito) -> Sober(vito, raymundo))\n\nSober(raymundo, raymundo)\n\nSober(raymundo, raymundo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-782"} {"premises": "The dina erode the beryle. The dina tumefy the beryle. The dina is modular. The dina is shelvy. The dina is uneven. The dina is antheral. The dina is retarded. The dina bottle the beryle. The beryle erode the dina. The beryle tumefy the dina. The beryle is modular. The beryle is shelvy. The beryle is uneven. The beryle is antheral. The beryle is retarded. The beryle bottle the dina. If someone bottle the dina then the dina is uneven. If someone is antheral and they eat the dina then they need the beryle. If the dina erode the beryle and the beryle erode the dina then the beryle tumefy the dina. If someone bottle the dina and they are uneven then the dina is modular. If the beryle tumefy the dina then the dina bottle the beryle. If someone bottle the beryle then they chase the beryle. If someone is uneven then they chase the dina. If someone erode the beryle then they eat the beryle. The beryle is uneven.", "logic": "\nErode(dina, beryle)\nTumefy(dina, beryle)\nModular(dina)\nShelvy(dina)\nUneven(dina)\nAntheral(dina)\nRetarded(dina)\nBottle(dina, beryle)\nErode(beryle, dina)\nTumefy(beryle, dina)\nModular(beryle)\nShelvy(beryle)\nUneven(beryle)\nAntheral(beryle)\nRetarded(beryle)\nBottle(beryle, dina)\nforall x (Bottle(x, dina) -> Uneven(dina))\nforall x (Antheral(x) and Tumefy(x, dina) -> Bottle(x, beryle))\nErode(dina, beryle) and Erode(beryle, dina) -> Tumefy(beryle, dina)\nforall x (Bottle(x, dina) and Uneven(x) -> Modular(dina))\nTumefy(beryle, dina) -> Bottle(dina, beryle)\nforall x (Bottle(x, beryle) -> Erode(x, beryle))\nforall x (Uneven(x) -> Erode(x, dina))\nforall x (Erode(x, beryle) -> Tumefy(x, beryle))\n\nUneven(beryle)\n\ntherefore Uneven(beryle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The bobine deracinate the stacia. The bobine silkscreen the stacia. The bobine is opened. The bobine is erroneous. The bobine is hunched. The bobine is confined. The bobine is front. The bobine convect the stacia. The stacia deracinate the bobine. The stacia silkscreen the bobine. The stacia is opened. The stacia is erroneous. The stacia is hunched. The stacia is confined. The stacia is front. The stacia convect the bobine. If someone convect the bobine then the bobine is hunched. If someone is confined and they eat the bobine then they need the stacia. If the bobine deracinate the stacia and the stacia deracinate the bobine then the stacia silkscreen the bobine. If someone convect the bobine and they are hunched then the bobine is opened. If the stacia silkscreen the bobine then the bobine convect the stacia. If someone convect the stacia then they chase the stacia. If someone is hunched then they chase the bobine. If someone deracinate the stacia then they eat the stacia. The stacia does not need the bobine.", "logic": "\nDeracinate(bobine, stacia)\nSilkscreen(bobine, stacia)\nOpened(bobine)\nErroneous(bobine)\nHunched(bobine)\nConfined(bobine)\nFront(bobine)\nConvect(bobine, stacia)\nDeracinate(stacia, bobine)\nSilkscreen(stacia, bobine)\nOpened(stacia)\nErroneous(stacia)\nHunched(stacia)\nConfined(stacia)\nFront(stacia)\nConvect(stacia, bobine)\nforall x (Convect(x, bobine) -> Hunched(bobine))\nforall x (Confined(x) and Silkscreen(x, bobine) -> Convect(x, stacia))\nDeracinate(bobine, stacia) and Deracinate(stacia, bobine) -> Silkscreen(stacia, bobine)\nforall x (Convect(x, bobine) and Hunched(x) -> Opened(bobine))\nSilkscreen(stacia, bobine) -> Convect(bobine, stacia)\nforall x (Convect(x, stacia) -> Deracinate(x, stacia))\nforall x (Hunched(x) -> Deracinate(x, bobine))\nforall x (Deracinate(x, stacia) -> Silkscreen(x, stacia))\n\nnot Convect(stacia, bobine)\n\ntherefore Convect(stacia, bobine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The janith harangue the alicia. The janith cicatrise the alicia. The janith is clxx. The janith is legitimate. The janith is worrying. The janith is unusual. The janith is accusive. The janith swot the alicia. The alicia harangue the janith. The alicia cicatrise the janith. The alicia is clxx. The alicia is legitimate. The alicia is worrying. The alicia is unusual. The alicia is accusive. The alicia swot the janith. If someone swot the janith then the janith is worrying. If someone is unusual and they eat the janith then they need the alicia. If the janith harangue the alicia and the alicia harangue the janith then the alicia cicatrise the janith. If someone swot the janith and they are worrying then the janith is clxx. If the alicia cicatrise the janith then the janith swot the alicia. If someone swot the alicia then they chase the alicia. If someone is worrying then they chase the janith. If someone harangue the alicia then they eat the alicia. The janith harangue the janith.", "logic": "\nHarangue(janith, alicia)\nCicatrise(janith, alicia)\nClxx(janith)\nLegitimate(janith)\nWorrying(janith)\nUnusual(janith)\nAccusive(janith)\nSwot(janith, alicia)\nHarangue(alicia, janith)\nCicatrise(alicia, janith)\nClxx(alicia)\nLegitimate(alicia)\nWorrying(alicia)\nUnusual(alicia)\nAccusive(alicia)\nSwot(alicia, janith)\nforall x (Swot(x, janith) -> Worrying(janith))\nforall x (Unusual(x) and Cicatrise(x, janith) -> Swot(x, alicia))\nHarangue(janith, alicia) and Harangue(alicia, janith) -> Cicatrise(alicia, janith)\nforall x (Swot(x, janith) and Worrying(x) -> Clxx(janith))\nCicatrise(alicia, janith) -> Swot(janith, alicia)\nforall x (Swot(x, alicia) -> Harangue(x, alicia))\nforall x (Worrying(x) -> Harangue(x, janith))\nforall x (Harangue(x, alicia) -> Cicatrise(x, alicia))\n\nHarangue(janith, janith)\n\nWorrying(janith) and forall x (Worrying(x) -> Harangue(x, janith)) -> therefore Harangue(janith, janith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The emily forbid the mikel. The emily colourise the mikel. The emily is patriotic. The emily is mated. The emily is exacting. The emily is played. The emily is cacuminal. The emily jimmy the mikel. The mikel forbid the emily. The mikel colourise the emily. The mikel is patriotic. The mikel is mated. The mikel is exacting. The mikel is played. The mikel is cacuminal. The mikel jimmy the emily. If someone jimmy the emily then the emily is exacting. If someone is played and they eat the emily then they need the mikel. If the emily forbid the mikel and the mikel forbid the emily then the mikel colourise the emily. If someone jimmy the emily and they are exacting then the emily is patriotic. If the mikel colourise the emily then the emily jimmy the mikel. If someone jimmy the mikel then they chase the mikel. If someone is exacting then they chase the emily. If someone forbid the mikel then they eat the mikel. The mikel does not need the mikel.", "logic": "\nForbid(emily, mikel)\nColourise(emily, mikel)\nPatriotic(emily)\nMated(emily)\nExacting(emily)\nPlayed(emily)\nCacuminal(emily)\nJimmy(emily, mikel)\nForbid(mikel, emily)\nColourise(mikel, emily)\nPatriotic(mikel)\nMated(mikel)\nExacting(mikel)\nPlayed(mikel)\nCacuminal(mikel)\nJimmy(mikel, emily)\nforall x (Jimmy(x, emily) -> Exacting(emily))\nforall x (Played(x) and Colourise(x, emily) -> Jimmy(x, mikel))\nForbid(emily, mikel) and Forbid(mikel, emily) -> Colourise(mikel, emily)\nforall x (Jimmy(x, emily) and Exacting(x) -> Patriotic(emily))\nColourise(mikel, emily) -> Jimmy(emily, mikel)\nforall x (Jimmy(x, mikel) -> Forbid(x, mikel))\nforall x (Exacting(x) -> Forbid(x, emily))\nforall x (Forbid(x, mikel) -> Colourise(x, mikel))\n\nnot Jimmy(mikel, mikel)\n\nPlayed(mikel) and Colourise(mikel, emily) and forall x (Played(x) and Colourise(x, emily) -> Jimmy(x, mikel)) -> therefore Jimmy(mikel, mikel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The ninon bread the burnaby. The ninon relegate the burnaby. The ninon is amusing. The ninon is eolotropic. The ninon is ghoulish. The ninon is entrancing. The ninon is ranking. The ninon mint the burnaby. The burnaby bread the ninon. The burnaby relegate the ninon. The burnaby is amusing. The burnaby is eolotropic. The burnaby is ghoulish. The burnaby is entrancing. The burnaby is ranking. The burnaby mint the ninon. If someone mint the ninon then the ninon is ghoulish. If someone is entrancing and they eat the ninon then they need the burnaby. If the ninon bread the burnaby and the burnaby bread the ninon then the burnaby relegate the ninon. If someone mint the ninon and they are ghoulish then the ninon is amusing. If the burnaby relegate the ninon then the ninon mint the burnaby. If someone mint the burnaby then they chase the burnaby. If someone is ghoulish then they chase the ninon. If someone bread the burnaby then they eat the burnaby. The burnaby bread the burnaby.", "logic": "\nBread(ninon, burnaby)\nRelegate(ninon, burnaby)\nAmusing(ninon)\nEolotropic(ninon)\nGhoulish(ninon)\nEntrancing(ninon)\nRanking(ninon)\nMint(ninon, burnaby)\nBread(burnaby, ninon)\nRelegate(burnaby, ninon)\nAmusing(burnaby)\nEolotropic(burnaby)\nGhoulish(burnaby)\nEntrancing(burnaby)\nRanking(burnaby)\nMint(burnaby, ninon)\nforall x (Mint(x, ninon) -> Ghoulish(ninon))\nforall x (Entrancing(x) and Relegate(x, ninon) -> Mint(x, burnaby))\nBread(ninon, burnaby) and Bread(burnaby, ninon) -> Relegate(burnaby, ninon)\nforall x (Mint(x, ninon) and Ghoulish(x) -> Amusing(ninon))\nRelegate(burnaby, ninon) -> Mint(ninon, burnaby)\nforall x (Mint(x, burnaby) -> Bread(x, burnaby))\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Bread(x, ninon))\nforall x (Bread(x, burnaby) -> Relegate(x, burnaby))\n\nBread(burnaby, burnaby)\n\nEntrancing(burnaby) and Relegate(burnaby, ninon) and forall x (Entrancing(x) and Relegate(x, ninon) -> Mint(x, burnaby)) -> therefore Mint(burnaby, burnaby) Mint(burnaby, burnaby) and forall x (Mint(x, burnaby) -> Bread(x, burnaby)) -> therefore Bread(burnaby, burnaby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The reginauld load the garth. The reginauld retrofit the garth. The reginauld is netted. The reginauld is thinkable. The reginauld is ictic. The reginauld is elective. The reginauld is peanut. The reginauld coiffe the garth. The garth load the reginauld. The garth retrofit the reginauld. The garth is netted. The garth is thinkable. The garth is ictic. The garth is elective. The garth is peanut. The garth coiffe the reginauld. If someone coiffe the reginauld then the reginauld is ictic. If someone is elective and they eat the reginauld then they need the garth. If the reginauld load the garth and the garth load the reginauld then the garth retrofit the reginauld. If someone coiffe the reginauld and they are ictic then the reginauld is netted. If the garth retrofit the reginauld then the reginauld coiffe the garth. If someone coiffe the garth then they chase the garth. If someone is ictic then they chase the reginauld. If someone load the garth then they eat the garth. The garth does not chase the garth.", "logic": "\nLoad(reginauld, garth)\nRetrofit(reginauld, garth)\nNetted(reginauld)\nThinkable(reginauld)\nIctic(reginauld)\nElective(reginauld)\nPeanut(reginauld)\nCoiffe(reginauld, garth)\nLoad(garth, reginauld)\nRetrofit(garth, reginauld)\nNetted(garth)\nThinkable(garth)\nIctic(garth)\nElective(garth)\nPeanut(garth)\nCoiffe(garth, reginauld)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, reginauld) -> Ictic(reginauld))\nforall x (Elective(x) and Retrofit(x, reginauld) -> Coiffe(x, garth))\nLoad(reginauld, garth) and Load(garth, reginauld) -> Retrofit(garth, reginauld)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, reginauld) and Ictic(x) -> Netted(reginauld))\nRetrofit(garth, reginauld) -> Coiffe(reginauld, garth)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, garth) -> Load(x, garth))\nforall x (Ictic(x) -> Load(x, reginauld))\nforall x (Load(x, garth) -> Retrofit(x, garth))\n\nnot Load(garth, garth)\n\nElective(garth) and Retrofit(garth, reginauld) and forall x (Elective(x) and Retrofit(x, reginauld) -> Coiffe(x, garth)) -> therefore Coiffe(garth, garth) Coiffe(garth, garth) and forall x (Coiffe(x, garth) -> Load(x, garth)) -> therefore Load(garth, garth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The nedda demean the roddy. The nedda glamourise the roddy. The nedda is quaggy. The nedda is earthborn. The nedda is ablated. The nedda is baculiform. The nedda is breakneck. The nedda chaffer the roddy. The roddy demean the nedda. The roddy glamourise the nedda. The roddy is quaggy. The roddy is earthborn. The roddy is ablated. The roddy is baculiform. The roddy is breakneck. The roddy chaffer the nedda. If someone chaffer the nedda then the nedda is ablated. If someone is baculiform and they eat the nedda then they need the roddy. If the nedda demean the roddy and the roddy demean the nedda then the roddy glamourise the nedda. If someone chaffer the nedda and they are ablated then the nedda is quaggy. If the roddy glamourise the nedda then the nedda chaffer the roddy. If someone chaffer the roddy then they chase the roddy. If someone is ablated then they chase the nedda. If someone demean the roddy then they eat the roddy. The roddy glamourise the roddy.", "logic": "\nDemean(nedda, roddy)\nGlamourise(nedda, roddy)\nQuaggy(nedda)\nEarthborn(nedda)\nAblated(nedda)\nBaculiform(nedda)\nBreakneck(nedda)\nChaffer(nedda, roddy)\nDemean(roddy, nedda)\nGlamourise(roddy, nedda)\nQuaggy(roddy)\nEarthborn(roddy)\nAblated(roddy)\nBaculiform(roddy)\nBreakneck(roddy)\nChaffer(roddy, nedda)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, nedda) -> Ablated(nedda))\nforall x (Baculiform(x) and Glamourise(x, nedda) -> Chaffer(x, roddy))\nDemean(nedda, roddy) and Demean(roddy, nedda) -> Glamourise(roddy, nedda)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, nedda) and Ablated(x) -> Quaggy(nedda))\nGlamourise(roddy, nedda) -> Chaffer(nedda, roddy)\nforall x (Chaffer(x, roddy) -> Demean(x, roddy))\nforall x (Ablated(x) -> Demean(x, nedda))\nforall x (Demean(x, roddy) -> Glamourise(x, roddy))\n\nGlamourise(roddy, roddy)\n\nBaculiform(roddy) and Glamourise(roddy, nedda) and forall x (Baculiform(x) and Glamourise(x, nedda) -> Chaffer(x, roddy)) -> therefore Chaffer(roddy, roddy) Chaffer(roddy, roddy) and forall x (Chaffer(x, roddy) -> Demean(x, roddy)) -> therefore Demean(roddy, roddy) Demean(roddy, roddy) and forall x (Demean(x, roddy) -> Glamourise(x, roddy)) -> therefore Glamourise(roddy, roddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The almeda christen the mitra. The almeda damp the mitra. The almeda is singular. The almeda is amorous. The almeda is atrip. The almeda is thready. The almeda is tarsal. The almeda undock the mitra. The mitra christen the almeda. The mitra damp the almeda. The mitra is singular. The mitra is amorous. The mitra is atrip. The mitra is thready. The mitra is tarsal. The mitra undock the almeda. If someone undock the almeda then the almeda is atrip. If someone is thready and they eat the almeda then they need the mitra. If the almeda christen the mitra and the mitra christen the almeda then the mitra damp the almeda. If someone undock the almeda and they are atrip then the almeda is singular. If the mitra damp the almeda then the almeda undock the mitra. If someone undock the mitra then they chase the mitra. If someone is atrip then they chase the almeda. If someone christen the mitra then they eat the mitra. The mitra does not eat the mitra.", "logic": "\nChristen(almeda, mitra)\nDamp(almeda, mitra)\nSingular(almeda)\nAmorous(almeda)\nAtrip(almeda)\nThready(almeda)\nTarsal(almeda)\nUndock(almeda, mitra)\nChristen(mitra, almeda)\nDamp(mitra, almeda)\nSingular(mitra)\nAmorous(mitra)\nAtrip(mitra)\nThready(mitra)\nTarsal(mitra)\nUndock(mitra, almeda)\nforall x (Undock(x, almeda) -> Atrip(almeda))\nforall x (Thready(x) and Damp(x, almeda) -> Undock(x, mitra))\nChristen(almeda, mitra) and Christen(mitra, almeda) -> Damp(mitra, almeda)\nforall x (Undock(x, almeda) and Atrip(x) -> Singular(almeda))\nDamp(mitra, almeda) -> Undock(almeda, mitra)\nforall x (Undock(x, mitra) -> Christen(x, mitra))\nforall x (Atrip(x) -> Christen(x, almeda))\nforall x (Christen(x, mitra) -> Damp(x, mitra))\n\nnot Damp(mitra, mitra)\n\nThready(mitra) and Damp(mitra, almeda) and forall x (Thready(x) and Damp(x, almeda) -> Undock(x, mitra)) -> therefore Undock(mitra, mitra) Undock(mitra, mitra) and forall x (Undock(x, mitra) -> Christen(x, mitra)) -> therefore Christen(mitra, mitra) Christen(mitra, mitra) and forall x (Christen(x, mitra) -> Damp(x, mitra)) -> therefore Damp(mitra, mitra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The gill unchain the anais. The gill beggar the anais. The gill is excursive. The gill is circadian. The gill is unspent. The gill is whispering. The gill is capped. The gill cycle the anais. The anais unchain the gill. The anais beggar the gill. The anais is excursive. The anais is circadian. The anais is unspent. The anais is whispering. The anais is capped. The anais cycle the gill. If someone cycle the gill then the gill is unspent. If someone is whispering and they eat the gill then they need the anais. If the gill unchain the anais and the anais unchain the gill then the anais beggar the gill. If someone cycle the gill and they are unspent then the gill is excursive. If the anais beggar the gill then the gill cycle the anais. If someone cycle the anais then they chase the anais. If someone is unspent then they chase the gill. If someone unchain the anais then they eat the anais. The gill does not need the gill.", "logic": "\nUnchain(gill, anais)\nBeggar(gill, anais)\nExcursive(gill)\nCircadian(gill)\nUnspent(gill)\nWhispering(gill)\nCapped(gill)\nCycle(gill, anais)\nUnchain(anais, gill)\nBeggar(anais, gill)\nExcursive(anais)\nCircadian(anais)\nUnspent(anais)\nWhispering(anais)\nCapped(anais)\nCycle(anais, gill)\nforall x (Cycle(x, gill) -> Unspent(gill))\nforall x (Whispering(x) and Beggar(x, gill) -> Cycle(x, anais))\nUnchain(gill, anais) and Unchain(anais, gill) -> Beggar(anais, gill)\nforall x (Cycle(x, gill) and Unspent(x) -> Excursive(gill))\nBeggar(anais, gill) -> Cycle(gill, anais)\nforall x (Cycle(x, anais) -> Unchain(x, anais))\nforall x (Unspent(x) -> Unchain(x, gill))\nforall x (Unchain(x, anais) -> Beggar(x, anais))\n\nnot Cycle(gill, gill)\n\nnot Cycle(gill, gill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The yehudit undercut the leonora. The yehudit class the leonora. The yehudit is published. The yehudit is apomictic. The yehudit is awnless. The yehudit is pickled. The yehudit is codified. The yehudit depute the leonora. The leonora undercut the yehudit. The leonora class the yehudit. The leonora is published. The leonora is apomictic. The leonora is awnless. The leonora is pickled. The leonora is codified. The leonora depute the yehudit. If someone depute the yehudit then the yehudit is awnless. If someone is pickled and they eat the yehudit then they need the leonora. If the yehudit undercut the leonora and the leonora undercut the yehudit then the leonora class the yehudit. If someone depute the yehudit and they are awnless then the yehudit is published. If the leonora class the yehudit then the yehudit depute the leonora. If someone depute the leonora then they chase the leonora. If someone is awnless then they chase the yehudit. If someone undercut the leonora then they eat the leonora. The yehudit class the yehudit.", "logic": "\nUndercut(yehudit, leonora)\nClass(yehudit, leonora)\nPublished(yehudit)\nApomictic(yehudit)\nAwnless(yehudit)\nPickled(yehudit)\nCodified(yehudit)\nDepute(yehudit, leonora)\nUndercut(leonora, yehudit)\nClass(leonora, yehudit)\nPublished(leonora)\nApomictic(leonora)\nAwnless(leonora)\nPickled(leonora)\nCodified(leonora)\nDepute(leonora, yehudit)\nforall x (Depute(x, yehudit) -> Awnless(yehudit))\nforall x (Pickled(x) and Class(x, yehudit) -> Depute(x, leonora))\nUndercut(yehudit, leonora) and Undercut(leonora, yehudit) -> Class(leonora, yehudit)\nforall x (Depute(x, yehudit) and Awnless(x) -> Published(yehudit))\nClass(leonora, yehudit) -> Depute(yehudit, leonora)\nforall x (Depute(x, leonora) -> Undercut(x, leonora))\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Undercut(x, yehudit))\nforall x (Undercut(x, leonora) -> Class(x, leonora))\n\nClass(yehudit, yehudit)\n\nClass(yehudit, yehudit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-501"} {"premises": "The joceline is tallish. Big things are unafraid. Nice things are mucinous. All tallish things are upscale. The joceline is tallish.", "logic": "\nTallish(joceline)\nforall x (Mucinous(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Mucinous(x))\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Upscale(x))\n\nTallish(joceline)\n\ntherefore Tallish(joceline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The keri is jaunty. Big things are maximal. Nice things are vexed. All jaunty things are undynamic. The keri is not jaunty.", "logic": "\nJaunty(keri)\nforall x (Vexed(x) -> Maximal(x))\nforall x (Undynamic(x) -> Vexed(x))\nforall x (Jaunty(x) -> Undynamic(x))\n\nnot Jaunty(keri)\n\ntherefore Jaunty(keri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The isahella is mendicant. Big things are tricolor. Nice things are unlikeable. All mendicant things are arable. The isahella is arable.", "logic": "\nMendicant(isahella)\nforall x (Unlikeable(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Arable(x) -> Unlikeable(x))\nforall x (Mendicant(x) -> Arable(x))\n\nArable(isahella)\n\nMendicant(isahella) and forall x (Mendicant(x) -> Arable(x)) -> therefore Arable(isahella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The mamie is cadaveric. Big things are ghanian. Nice things are acidulent. All cadaveric things are meshuga. The mamie is not meshuga.", "logic": "\nCadaveric(mamie)\nforall x (Acidulent(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Cadaveric(x) -> Meshuga(x))\n\nnot Meshuga(mamie)\n\nCadaveric(mamie) and forall x (Cadaveric(x) -> Meshuga(x)) -> therefore Meshuga(mamie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The ricca is strep. Big things are troubling. Nice things are permeant. All strep things are unreliable. The ricca is permeant.", "logic": "\nStrep(ricca)\nforall x (Permeant(x) -> Troubling(x))\nforall x (Unreliable(x) -> Permeant(x))\nforall x (Strep(x) -> Unreliable(x))\n\nPermeant(ricca)\n\nStrep(ricca) and forall x (Strep(x) -> Unreliable(x)) -> therefore Unreliable(ricca) Unreliable(ricca) and forall x (Unreliable(x) -> Permeant(x)) -> therefore Permeant(ricca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The robby is mastoidal. Big things are nude. Nice things are unwooded. All mastoidal things are reversive. The robby is not unwooded.", "logic": "\nMastoidal(robby)\nforall x (Unwooded(x) -> Nude(x))\nforall x (Reversive(x) -> Unwooded(x))\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) -> Reversive(x))\n\nnot Unwooded(robby)\n\nMastoidal(robby) and forall x (Mastoidal(x) -> Reversive(x)) -> therefore Reversive(robby) Reversive(robby) and forall x (Reversive(x) -> Unwooded(x)) -> therefore Unwooded(robby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The zola is deafening. Big things are limiting. Nice things are authentic. All deafening things are neural. The zola is limiting.", "logic": "\nDeafening(zola)\nforall x (Authentic(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Neural(x) -> Authentic(x))\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Neural(x))\n\nLimiting(zola)\n\nDeafening(zola) and forall x (Deafening(x) -> Neural(x)) -> therefore Neural(zola) Neural(zola) and forall x (Neural(x) -> Authentic(x)) -> therefore Authentic(zola) Authentic(zola) and forall x (Authentic(x) -> Limiting(x)) -> therefore Limiting(zola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The shelba is acetous. Big things are aleatory. Nice things are amitotic. All acetous things are unwoven. The shelba is not aleatory.", "logic": "\nAcetous(shelba)\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> Aleatory(x))\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> Amitotic(x))\nforall x (Acetous(x) -> Unwoven(x))\n\nnot Aleatory(shelba)\n\nAcetous(shelba) and forall x (Acetous(x) -> Unwoven(x)) -> therefore Unwoven(shelba) Unwoven(shelba) and forall x (Unwoven(x) -> Amitotic(x)) -> therefore Amitotic(shelba) Amitotic(shelba) and forall x (Amitotic(x) -> Aleatory(x)) -> therefore Aleatory(shelba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The ferne is acetic. Big things are mantic. Nice things are precedent. All acetic things are galilean. The ferne does not chase the ferne.", "logic": "\nAcetic(ferne)\nforall x (Precedent(x) -> Mantic(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) -> Precedent(x))\nforall x (Acetic(x) -> Galilean(x))\n\nnot Chases(ferne, ferne)\n\nnot Chases(ferne, ferne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The peyton is artless. Big things are prayerful. Nice things are eventual. All artless things are ready. The peyton needs the peyton.", "logic": "\nArtless(peyton)\nforall x (Eventual(x) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Ready(x) -> Eventual(x))\nforall x (Artless(x) -> Ready(x))\n\nNeeds(peyton, peyton)\n\nNeeds(peyton, peyton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The hart is oleaceous. Big things are intact. Nice things are tyrannical. All oleaceous things are seminude. The hart does not see the hart.", "logic": "\nOleaceous(hart)\nforall x (Tyrannical(x) -> Intact(x))\nforall x (Seminude(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\nforall x (Oleaceous(x) -> Seminude(x))\n\nnot Sees(hart, hart)\n\nnot Sees(hart, hart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The jessie is inchoative. Big things are shady. Nice things are overt. All inchoative things are spatulate. The jessie is kind.", "logic": "\nInchoative(jessie)\nforall x (Overt(x) -> Shady(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Overt(x))\nforall x (Inchoative(x) -> Spatulate(x))\n\nKind(jessie)\n\nKind(jessie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-17"} {"premises": "The sibylla drawl the emilia. The sibylla desquamate the emilia. The sibylla egotrip the emilia. The emilia is intricate. The emilia is hurtful. The emilia is trifoliate. The emilia is not particular. The emilia drawl the sibylla. The emilia desquamate the sibylla. The emilia does not visit the sibylla. If something desquamate the sibylla then the sibylla is hurtful. If something egotrip the emilia and it egotrip the sibylla then it desquamate the sibylla. If something drawl the emilia and the emilia is intricate then it desquamate the sibylla. If something is trifoliate and it drawl the emilia then it desquamate the emilia. If something egotrip the sibylla then the sibylla desquamate the emilia. If something egotrip the sibylla then the sibylla is not intricate. If something is inapt then it is not hurtful. Red things are intricate. The sibylla desquamate the emilia.", "logic": "\nDrawl(sibylla, emilia)\nDesquamate(sibylla, emilia)\nEgotrip(sibylla, emilia)\nIntricate(emilia)\nHurtful(emilia)\nTrifoliate(emilia)\nnot Particular(emilia)\nDrawl(emilia, sibylla)\nDesquamate(emilia, sibylla)\nnot Egotrip(emilia, sibylla)\nforall x (Desquamate(x, sibylla) -> Hurtful(sibylla))\nforall x (Egotrip(x, emilia) and Egotrip(x, sibylla) -> Desquamate(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Drawl(x, emilia) and Intricate(emilia) -> Desquamate(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Trifoliate(x) and Drawl(x, emilia) -> Desquamate(x, emilia))\nforall x (Egotrip(x, sibylla) -> Desquamate(sibylla, emilia))\nforall x (Egotrip(x, sibylla) -> not Intricate(sibylla))\nforall x (Inapt(x) -> not Hurtful(x))\nforall x (Particular(x) -> Intricate(x))\n\nDesquamate(sibylla, emilia)\n\ntherefore Desquamate(sibylla, emilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2399"} {"premises": "The stillman discourse the margareta. The stillman suspire the margareta. The stillman snowmobile the margareta. The margareta is present. The margareta is shrivelled. The margareta is proactive. The margareta is not nubby. The margareta discourse the stillman. The margareta suspire the stillman. The margareta does not visit the stillman. If something suspire the stillman then the stillman is shrivelled. If something snowmobile the margareta and it snowmobile the stillman then it suspire the stillman. If something discourse the margareta and the margareta is present then it suspire the stillman. If something is proactive and it discourse the margareta then it suspire the margareta. If something snowmobile the stillman then the stillman suspire the margareta. If something snowmobile the stillman then the stillman is not present. If something is stormproof then it is not shrivelled. Red things are present. The margareta is not proactive.", "logic": "\nDiscourse(stillman, margareta)\nSuspire(stillman, margareta)\nSnowmobile(stillman, margareta)\nPresent(margareta)\nShrivelled(margareta)\nProactive(margareta)\nnot Nubby(margareta)\nDiscourse(margareta, stillman)\nSuspire(margareta, stillman)\nnot Snowmobile(margareta, stillman)\nforall x (Suspire(x, stillman) -> Shrivelled(stillman))\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, margareta) and Snowmobile(x, stillman) -> Suspire(x, stillman))\nforall x (Discourse(x, margareta) and Present(margareta) -> Suspire(x, stillman))\nforall x (Proactive(x) and Discourse(x, margareta) -> Suspire(x, margareta))\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, stillman) -> Suspire(stillman, margareta))\nforall x (Snowmobile(x, stillman) -> not Present(stillman))\nforall x (Stormproof(x) -> not Shrivelled(x))\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Present(x))\n\nnot Proactive(margareta)\n\ntherefore Proactive(margareta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2399"} {"premises": "The alton determine the viviene. The alton desolate the viviene. The alton unmake the viviene. The viviene is unsoiled. The viviene is nineteenth. The viviene is rampant. The viviene is not unbiased. The viviene determine the alton. The viviene desolate the alton. The viviene does not visit the alton. If something desolate the alton then the alton is nineteenth. If something unmake the viviene and it unmake the alton then it desolate the alton. If something determine the viviene and the viviene is unsoiled then it desolate the alton. If something is rampant and it determine the viviene then it desolate the viviene. If something unmake the alton then the alton desolate the viviene. If something unmake the alton then the alton is not unsoiled. If something is mangey then it is not nineteenth. Red things are unsoiled. The alton is not unsoiled.", "logic": "\nDetermine(alton, viviene)\nDesolate(alton, viviene)\nUnmake(alton, viviene)\nUnsoiled(viviene)\nNineteenth(viviene)\nRampant(viviene)\nnot Unbiased(viviene)\nDetermine(viviene, alton)\nDesolate(viviene, alton)\nnot Unmake(viviene, alton)\nforall x (Desolate(x, alton) -> Nineteenth(alton))\nforall x (Unmake(x, viviene) and Unmake(x, alton) -> Desolate(x, alton))\nforall x (Determine(x, viviene) and Unsoiled(viviene) -> Desolate(x, alton))\nforall x (Rampant(x) and Determine(x, viviene) -> Desolate(x, viviene))\nforall x (Unmake(x, alton) -> Desolate(alton, viviene))\nforall x (Unmake(x, alton) -> not Unsoiled(alton))\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> not Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Unsoiled(x))\n\nnot Unsoiled(alton)\n\nforall x (Unbiased(x) -> Unsoiled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2399"} {"premises": "The adara readmit the silvanus. The adara lour the silvanus. The adara compute the silvanus. The silvanus is ruffled. The silvanus is lumbering. The silvanus is fuzzed. The silvanus is not pelecypod. The silvanus readmit the adara. The silvanus lour the adara. The silvanus does not visit the adara. If something lour the adara then the adara is lumbering. If something compute the silvanus and it compute the adara then it lour the adara. If something readmit the silvanus and the silvanus is ruffled then it lour the adara. If something is fuzzed and it readmit the silvanus then it lour the silvanus. If something compute the adara then the adara lour the silvanus. If something compute the adara then the adara is not ruffled. If something is draughty then it is not lumbering. Red things are ruffled. The silvanus is draughty.", "logic": "\nReadmit(adara, silvanus)\nLour(adara, silvanus)\nCompute(adara, silvanus)\nRuffled(silvanus)\nLumbering(silvanus)\nFuzzed(silvanus)\nnot Pelecypod(silvanus)\nReadmit(silvanus, adara)\nLour(silvanus, adara)\nnot Compute(silvanus, adara)\nforall x (Lour(x, adara) -> Lumbering(adara))\nforall x (Compute(x, silvanus) and Compute(x, adara) -> Lour(x, adara))\nforall x (Readmit(x, silvanus) and Ruffled(silvanus) -> Lour(x, adara))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Readmit(x, silvanus) -> Lour(x, silvanus))\nforall x (Compute(x, adara) -> Lour(adara, silvanus))\nforall x (Compute(x, adara) -> not Ruffled(adara))\nforall x (Draughty(x) -> not Lumbering(x))\nforall x (Pelecypod(x) -> Ruffled(x))\n\nDraughty(silvanus)\n\nDraughty(silvanus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2399"} {"premises": "Dorise is epizoan. Stirling is indiscreet. Berte is indiscreet. If Dorise is ratable and Dorise is beakless then Dorise is maimed. If something is epizoan and prickly then it is beakless. Big, prickly things are maimed. If Berte is beakless then Berte is acquirable. All indiscreet things are beakless. All acquirable, maimed things are ratable. All indiscreet, acquirable things are epizoan. All indiscreet, prickly things are ratable. Stirling is indiscreet.", "logic": "\nEpizoan(dorise)\nIndiscreet(stirling)\nIndiscreet(berte)\nRatable(dorise) and Beakless(dorise) -> Maimed(dorise)\nforall x (Epizoan(x) and Prickly(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Epizoan(x) and Prickly(x) -> Maimed(x))\nBeakless(berte) -> Acquirable(berte)\nforall x (Indiscreet(x) -> Beakless(x))\nforall x (Acquirable(x) and Maimed(x) -> Ratable(x))\nforall x (Indiscreet(x) and Acquirable(x) -> Epizoan(x))\nforall x (Indiscreet(x) and Prickly(x) -> Ratable(x))\n\nIndiscreet(stirling)\n\ntherefore Indiscreet(stirling)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Davis is wrenching. Meghann is kurdish. Sandye is kurdish. If Davis is particular and Davis is zimbabwean then Davis is even. If something is wrenching and improvable then it is zimbabwean. Big, improvable things are even. If Sandye is zimbabwean then Sandye is armless. All kurdish things are zimbabwean. All armless, even things are particular. All kurdish, armless things are wrenching. All kurdish, improvable things are particular. Meghann is not kurdish.", "logic": "\nWrenching(davis)\nKurdish(meghann)\nKurdish(sandye)\nParticular(davis) and Zimbabwean(davis) -> Even(davis)\nforall x (Wrenching(x) and Improvable(x) -> Zimbabwean(x))\nforall x (Wrenching(x) and Improvable(x) -> Even(x))\nZimbabwean(sandye) -> Armless(sandye)\nforall x (Kurdish(x) -> Zimbabwean(x))\nforall x (Armless(x) and Even(x) -> Particular(x))\nforall x (Kurdish(x) and Armless(x) -> Wrenching(x))\nforall x (Kurdish(x) and Improvable(x) -> Particular(x))\n\nnot Kurdish(meghann)\n\ntherefore Kurdish(meghann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Anurag is stuck. Willow is ageless. Yevette is ageless. If Anurag is larghetto and Anurag is estival then Anurag is famed. If something is stuck and dantean then it is estival. Big, dantean things are famed. If Yevette is estival then Yevette is unmedical. All ageless things are estival. All unmedical, famed things are larghetto. All ageless, unmedical things are stuck. All ageless, dantean things are larghetto. Yevette is estival.", "logic": "\nStuck(anurag)\nAgeless(willow)\nAgeless(yevette)\nLarghetto(anurag) and Estival(anurag) -> Famed(anurag)\nforall x (Stuck(x) and Dantean(x) -> Estival(x))\nforall x (Stuck(x) and Dantean(x) -> Famed(x))\nEstival(yevette) -> Unmedical(yevette)\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Estival(x))\nforall x (Unmedical(x) and Famed(x) -> Larghetto(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) and Unmedical(x) -> Stuck(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) and Dantean(x) -> Larghetto(x))\n\nEstival(yevette)\n\nAgeless(yevette) and forall x (Ageless(x) -> Estival(x)) -> therefore Estival(yevette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Gustave is junior. Aurelie is sprawly. Valaria is sprawly. If Gustave is brunette and Gustave is sapient then Gustave is unreserved. If something is junior and intuitive then it is sapient. Big, intuitive things are unreserved. If Valaria is sapient then Valaria is wailing. All sprawly things are sapient. All wailing, unreserved things are brunette. All sprawly, wailing things are junior. All sprawly, intuitive things are brunette. Aurelie is not sapient.", "logic": "\nJunior(gustave)\nSprawly(aurelie)\nSprawly(valaria)\nBrunette(gustave) and Sapient(gustave) -> Unreserved(gustave)\nforall x (Junior(x) and Intuitive(x) -> Sapient(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) and Intuitive(x) -> Unreserved(x))\nSapient(valaria) -> Wailing(valaria)\nforall x (Sprawly(x) -> Sapient(x))\nforall x (Wailing(x) and Unreserved(x) -> Brunette(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) and Wailing(x) -> Junior(x))\nforall x (Sprawly(x) and Intuitive(x) -> Brunette(x))\n\nnot Sapient(aurelie)\n\nSprawly(aurelie) and forall x (Sprawly(x) -> Sapient(x)) -> therefore Sapient(aurelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Georgena is peripteral. Stewart is shaven. Carlee is shaven. If Georgena is spiritual and Georgena is vigesimal then Georgena is trancelike. If something is peripteral and wagnerian then it is vigesimal. Big, wagnerian things are trancelike. If Carlee is vigesimal then Carlee is wobbling. All shaven things are vigesimal. All wobbling, trancelike things are spiritual. All shaven, wobbling things are peripteral. All shaven, wagnerian things are spiritual. Carlee is wobbling.", "logic": "\nPeripteral(georgena)\nShaven(stewart)\nShaven(carlee)\nSpiritual(georgena) and Vigesimal(georgena) -> Trancelike(georgena)\nforall x (Peripteral(x) and Wagnerian(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) and Wagnerian(x) -> Trancelike(x))\nVigesimal(carlee) -> Wobbling(carlee)\nforall x (Shaven(x) -> Vigesimal(x))\nforall x (Wobbling(x) and Trancelike(x) -> Spiritual(x))\nforall x (Shaven(x) and Wobbling(x) -> Peripteral(x))\nforall x (Shaven(x) and Wagnerian(x) -> Spiritual(x))\n\nWobbling(carlee)\n\nShaven(carlee) and forall x (Shaven(x) -> Vigesimal(x)) -> therefore Vigesimal(carlee) Vigesimal(carlee) and Vigesimal(carlee) -> Wobbling(carlee) -> therefore Wobbling(carlee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Maggi is previous. Gian is caesural. Shir is caesural. If Maggi is shrunken and Maggi is crinoid then Maggi is puppyish. If something is previous and aureate then it is crinoid. Big, aureate things are puppyish. If Shir is crinoid then Shir is luminous. All caesural things are crinoid. All luminous, puppyish things are shrunken. All caesural, luminous things are previous. All caesural, aureate things are shrunken. Shir is not luminous.", "logic": "\nPrevious(maggi)\nCaesural(gian)\nCaesural(shir)\nShrunken(maggi) and Crinoid(maggi) -> Puppyish(maggi)\nforall x (Previous(x) and Aureate(x) -> Crinoid(x))\nforall x (Previous(x) and Aureate(x) -> Puppyish(x))\nCrinoid(shir) -> Luminous(shir)\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Crinoid(x))\nforall x (Luminous(x) and Puppyish(x) -> Shrunken(x))\nforall x (Caesural(x) and Luminous(x) -> Previous(x))\nforall x (Caesural(x) and Aureate(x) -> Shrunken(x))\n\nnot Luminous(shir)\n\nCaesural(shir) and forall x (Caesural(x) -> Crinoid(x)) -> therefore Crinoid(shir) Crinoid(shir) and Crinoid(shir) -> Luminous(shir) -> therefore Luminous(shir)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Carmine is connective. Hunter is unstinted. Camile is unstinted. If Carmine is prismatic and Carmine is saintly then Carmine is sufi. If something is connective and crackle then it is saintly. Big, crackle things are sufi. If Camile is saintly then Camile is managerial. All unstinted things are saintly. All managerial, sufi things are prismatic. All unstinted, managerial things are connective. All unstinted, crackle things are prismatic. Camile is connective.", "logic": "\nConnective(carmine)\nUnstinted(hunter)\nUnstinted(camile)\nPrismatic(carmine) and Saintly(carmine) -> Sufi(carmine)\nforall x (Connective(x) and Crackle(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Connective(x) and Crackle(x) -> Sufi(x))\nSaintly(camile) -> Managerial(camile)\nforall x (Unstinted(x) -> Saintly(x))\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Sufi(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Unstinted(x) and Managerial(x) -> Connective(x))\nforall x (Unstinted(x) and Crackle(x) -> Prismatic(x))\n\nConnective(camile)\n\nUnstinted(camile) and forall x (Unstinted(x) -> Saintly(x)) -> therefore Saintly(camile) Saintly(camile) and Saintly(camile) -> Managerial(camile) -> therefore Managerial(camile) Unstinted(camile) and Managerial(camile) and forall x (Unstinted(x) and Managerial(x) -> Connective(x)) -> therefore Connective(camile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Bing is wroth. Carlynne is miasmal. Charleen is miasmal. If Bing is gerundial and Bing is comfy then Bing is unisexual. If something is wroth and sinistral then it is comfy. Big, sinistral things are unisexual. If Charleen is comfy then Charleen is zippy. All miasmal things are comfy. All zippy, unisexual things are gerundial. All miasmal, zippy things are wroth. All miasmal, sinistral things are gerundial. Charleen is not wroth.", "logic": "\nWroth(bing)\nMiasmal(carlynne)\nMiasmal(charleen)\nGerundial(bing) and Comfy(bing) -> Unisexual(bing)\nforall x (Wroth(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Comfy(x))\nforall x (Wroth(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Unisexual(x))\nComfy(charleen) -> Zippy(charleen)\nforall x (Miasmal(x) -> Comfy(x))\nforall x (Zippy(x) and Unisexual(x) -> Gerundial(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Zippy(x) -> Wroth(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and Sinistral(x) -> Gerundial(x))\n\nnot Wroth(charleen)\n\nMiasmal(charleen) and forall x (Miasmal(x) -> Comfy(x)) -> therefore Comfy(charleen) Comfy(charleen) and Comfy(charleen) -> Zippy(charleen) -> therefore Zippy(charleen) Miasmal(charleen) and Zippy(charleen) and forall x (Miasmal(x) and Zippy(x) -> Wroth(x)) -> therefore Wroth(charleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Maddalena is orthogonal. Rudolph is chinked. Nataline is chinked. If Maddalena is corny and Maddalena is andean then Maddalena is annular. If something is orthogonal and gloomful then it is andean. Big, gloomful things are annular. If Nataline is andean then Nataline is five. All chinked things are andean. All five, annular things are corny. All chinked, five things are orthogonal. All chinked, gloomful things are corny. Maddalena is not annular.", "logic": "\nOrthogonal(maddalena)\nChinked(rudolph)\nChinked(nataline)\nCorny(maddalena) and Andean(maddalena) -> Annular(maddalena)\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) and Gloomful(x) -> Andean(x))\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) and Gloomful(x) -> Annular(x))\nAndean(nataline) -> Five(nataline)\nforall x (Chinked(x) -> Andean(x))\nforall x (Five(x) and Annular(x) -> Corny(x))\nforall x (Chinked(x) and Five(x) -> Orthogonal(x))\nforall x (Chinked(x) and Gloomful(x) -> Corny(x))\n\nnot Annular(maddalena)\n\nCorny(maddalena) and Andean(maddalena) -> Annular(maddalena) <- forall x (Five(x) and Annular(x) -> Corny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Julissa is patented. Josie is assumptive. Reese is assumptive. If Julissa is downhill and Julissa is neckless then Julissa is cramped. If something is patented and admirable then it is neckless. Big, admirable things are cramped. If Reese is neckless then Reese is pitiless. All assumptive things are neckless. All pitiless, cramped things are downhill. All assumptive, pitiless things are patented. All assumptive, admirable things are downhill. Julissa is downhill.", "logic": "\nPatented(julissa)\nAssumptive(josie)\nAssumptive(reese)\nDownhill(julissa) and Neckless(julissa) -> Cramped(julissa)\nforall x (Patented(x) and Admirable(x) -> Neckless(x))\nforall x (Patented(x) and Admirable(x) -> Cramped(x))\nNeckless(reese) -> Pitiless(reese)\nforall x (Assumptive(x) -> Neckless(x))\nforall x (Pitiless(x) and Cramped(x) -> Downhill(x))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) and Pitiless(x) -> Patented(x))\nforall x (Assumptive(x) and Admirable(x) -> Downhill(x))\n\nDownhill(julissa)\n\nforall x (Pitiless(x) and Cramped(x) -> Downhill(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Amalee is erect. Emelina is exigent. Georgia is exigent. If Amalee is cockamamy and Amalee is romaic then Amalee is physical. If something is erect and plentiful then it is romaic. Big, plentiful things are physical. If Georgia is romaic then Georgia is costumed. All exigent things are romaic. All costumed, physical things are cockamamy. All exigent, costumed things are erect. All exigent, plentiful things are cockamamy. Georgia is not cockamamy.", "logic": "\nErect(amalee)\nExigent(emelina)\nExigent(georgia)\nCockamamy(amalee) and Romaic(amalee) -> Physical(amalee)\nforall x (Erect(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Romaic(x))\nforall x (Erect(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Physical(x))\nRomaic(georgia) -> Costumed(georgia)\nforall x (Exigent(x) -> Romaic(x))\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Physical(x) -> Cockamamy(x))\nforall x (Exigent(x) and Costumed(x) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Exigent(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Cockamamy(x))\n\nnot Cockamamy(georgia)\n\nforall x (Costumed(x) and Physical(x) -> Cockamamy(x)) <- forall x (Erect(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Physical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Casey is rectified. Norman is pointless. Jaine is pointless. If Casey is empiric and Casey is winding then Casey is postnatal. If something is rectified and electric then it is winding. Big, electric things are postnatal. If Jaine is winding then Jaine is thorny. All pointless things are winding. All thorny, postnatal things are empiric. All pointless, thorny things are rectified. All pointless, electric things are empiric. Jaine is postnatal.", "logic": "\nRectified(casey)\nPointless(norman)\nPointless(jaine)\nEmpiric(casey) and Winding(casey) -> Postnatal(casey)\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Electric(x) -> Winding(x))\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Electric(x) -> Postnatal(x))\nWinding(jaine) -> Thorny(jaine)\nforall x (Pointless(x) -> Winding(x))\nforall x (Thorny(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Empiric(x))\nforall x (Pointless(x) and Thorny(x) -> Rectified(x))\nforall x (Pointless(x) and Electric(x) -> Empiric(x))\n\nPostnatal(jaine)\n\nforall x (Rectified(x) and Electric(x) -> Postnatal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Valma is pure. Jazmin is sanctioned. Laryssa is sanctioned. If Valma is hypodermal and Valma is unflawed then Valma is germane. If something is pure and zoftig then it is unflawed. Big, zoftig things are germane. If Laryssa is unflawed then Laryssa is monotypic. All sanctioned things are unflawed. All monotypic, germane things are hypodermal. All sanctioned, monotypic things are pure. All sanctioned, zoftig things are hypodermal. Valma is not monotypic.", "logic": "\nPure(valma)\nSanctioned(jazmin)\nSanctioned(laryssa)\nHypodermal(valma) and Unflawed(valma) -> Germane(valma)\nforall x (Pure(x) and Zoftig(x) -> Unflawed(x))\nforall x (Pure(x) and Zoftig(x) -> Germane(x))\nUnflawed(laryssa) -> Monotypic(laryssa)\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) -> Unflawed(x))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and Germane(x) -> Hypodermal(x))\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) and Monotypic(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) and Zoftig(x) -> Hypodermal(x))\n\nnot Monotypic(valma)\n\nnot Monotypic(valma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Christos is grand. Paul is driving. Bryan is driving. If Christos is flatulent and Christos is colorless then Christos is regent. If something is grand and deceptive then it is colorless. Big, deceptive things are regent. If Bryan is colorless then Bryan is crinoid. All driving things are colorless. All crinoid, regent things are flatulent. All driving, crinoid things are grand. All driving, deceptive things are flatulent. Bryan is deceptive.", "logic": "\nGrand(christos)\nDriving(paul)\nDriving(bryan)\nFlatulent(christos) and Colorless(christos) -> Regent(christos)\nforall x (Grand(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Grand(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Regent(x))\nColorless(bryan) -> Crinoid(bryan)\nforall x (Driving(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) and Regent(x) -> Flatulent(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) and Crinoid(x) -> Grand(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Flatulent(x))\n\nDeceptive(bryan)\n\nDeceptive(bryan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Allyson is manky. Norman is belittled. Debbie is belittled. If Allyson is pocked and Allyson is venetian then Allyson is vincible. If something is manky and impure then it is venetian. Big, impure things are vincible. If Debbie is venetian then Debbie is packed. All belittled things are venetian. All packed, vincible things are pocked. All belittled, packed things are manky. All belittled, impure things are pocked. Allyson is not belittled.", "logic": "\nManky(allyson)\nBelittled(norman)\nBelittled(debbie)\nPocked(allyson) and Venetian(allyson) -> Vincible(allyson)\nforall x (Manky(x) and Impure(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Manky(x) and Impure(x) -> Vincible(x))\nVenetian(debbie) -> Packed(debbie)\nforall x (Belittled(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Packed(x) and Vincible(x) -> Pocked(x))\nforall x (Belittled(x) and Packed(x) -> Manky(x))\nforall x (Belittled(x) and Impure(x) -> Pocked(x))\n\nnot Belittled(allyson)\n\nnot Belittled(allyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Mairead is biogenous. Skipp is askew. Mischa is askew. If Mairead is under and Mairead is symphonic then Mairead is unaired. If something is biogenous and gaping then it is symphonic. Big, gaping things are unaired. If Mischa is symphonic then Mischa is unhelpful. All askew things are symphonic. All unhelpful, unaired things are under. All askew, unhelpful things are biogenous. All askew, gaping things are under. Skipp is gaping.", "logic": "\nBiogenous(mairead)\nAskew(skipp)\nAskew(mischa)\nUnder(mairead) and Symphonic(mairead) -> Unaired(mairead)\nforall x (Biogenous(x) and Gaping(x) -> Symphonic(x))\nforall x (Biogenous(x) and Gaping(x) -> Unaired(x))\nSymphonic(mischa) -> Unhelpful(mischa)\nforall x (Askew(x) -> Symphonic(x))\nforall x (Unhelpful(x) and Unaired(x) -> Under(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) and Unhelpful(x) -> Biogenous(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) and Gaping(x) -> Under(x))\n\nGaping(skipp)\n\nGaping(skipp) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-770"} {"premises": "Ileana is slav. Ileana is bulbous. Ileana is classified. Ileana is erosive. Ileana is intestate. Ileana is nugatory. Ileana is defoliate. Jeanette is slav. Jeanette is bulbous. Jeanette is classified. Jeanette is erosive. Jeanette is intestate. Jeanette is nugatory. Jeanette is defoliate. If something is classified then it is nugatory. Nice, defoliate things are nugatory. Rough things are bulbous. Ileana is nugatory.", "logic": "\nSlav(ileana)\nBulbous(ileana)\nClassified(ileana)\nErosive(ileana)\nIntestate(ileana)\nNugatory(ileana)\nDefoliate(ileana)\nSlav(jeanette)\nBulbous(jeanette)\nClassified(jeanette)\nErosive(jeanette)\nIntestate(jeanette)\nNugatory(jeanette)\nDefoliate(jeanette)\nforall x (Classified(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Intestate(x) and Defoliate(x) -> Nugatory(x))\nforall x (Nugatory(x) -> Bulbous(x))\n\nNugatory(ileana)\n\ntherefore Nugatory(ileana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-890"} {"premises": "Kristian is shabby. Kristian is reliable. Kristian is asthmatic. Kristian is mild. Kristian is unbending. Kristian is ethiopian. Kristian is paradisaic. Bay is shabby. Bay is reliable. Bay is asthmatic. Bay is mild. Bay is unbending. Bay is ethiopian. Bay is paradisaic. If something is asthmatic then it is ethiopian. Nice, paradisaic things are ethiopian. Rough things are reliable. Bay is not paradisaic.", "logic": "\nShabby(kristian)\nReliable(kristian)\nAsthmatic(kristian)\nMild(kristian)\nUnbending(kristian)\nEthiopian(kristian)\nParadisaic(kristian)\nShabby(bay)\nReliable(bay)\nAsthmatic(bay)\nMild(bay)\nUnbending(bay)\nEthiopian(bay)\nParadisaic(bay)\nforall x (Asthmatic(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\nforall x (Unbending(x) and Paradisaic(x) -> Ethiopian(x))\nforall x (Ethiopian(x) -> Reliable(x))\n\nnot Paradisaic(bay)\n\ntherefore Paradisaic(bay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-890"} {"premises": "The sturgis tread the mace. The mace itinerate the fara. The fara is not rental. If someone tread the fara then the fara is streaked. If someone tread the mace and the mace itinerate the sturgis then they see the sturgis. If someone is nonlethal then they see the fara. If someone tread the mace then they are nonlethal. If someone tread the mace then they are fiftieth. If the mace tread the fara and the mace is not nonlethal then the mace does not like the fara. The mace itinerate the fara.", "logic": "\nTread(sturgis, mace)\nItinerate(mace, fara)\nnot Rental(fara)\nforall x (Tread(x, fara) -> Streaked(fara))\nforall x (Tread(x, mace) and Itinerate(mace, sturgis) -> Tread(x, sturgis))\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) -> Tread(x, fara))\nforall x (Tread(x, mace) -> Nonlethal(x))\nforall x (Tread(x, mace) -> Fiftieth(x))\nTread(mace, fara) and not Nonlethal(mace) -> not Brook(mace, fara)\n\nItinerate(mace, fara)\n\ntherefore Itinerate(mace, fara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The beaufort uncover the gretchen. The gretchen basset the madelin. The madelin is not nonskid. If someone uncover the madelin then the madelin is ravaged. If someone uncover the gretchen and the gretchen basset the beaufort then they see the beaufort. If someone is satanic then they see the madelin. If someone uncover the gretchen then they are satanic. If someone uncover the gretchen then they are alienated. If the gretchen uncover the madelin and the gretchen is not satanic then the gretchen does not like the madelin. The madelin is nonskid.", "logic": "\nUncover(beaufort, gretchen)\nBasset(gretchen, madelin)\nnot Nonskid(madelin)\nforall x (Uncover(x, madelin) -> Ravaged(madelin))\nforall x (Uncover(x, gretchen) and Basset(gretchen, beaufort) -> Uncover(x, beaufort))\nforall x (Satanic(x) -> Uncover(x, madelin))\nforall x (Uncover(x, gretchen) -> Satanic(x))\nforall x (Uncover(x, gretchen) -> Alienated(x))\nUncover(gretchen, madelin) and not Satanic(gretchen) -> not Skyrocket(gretchen, madelin)\n\nNonskid(madelin)\n\ntherefore not Nonskid(madelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The tanney martyr the adaline. The adaline castle the beverly. The beverly is not fervid. If someone martyr the beverly then the beverly is paradisiac. If someone martyr the adaline and the adaline castle the tanney then they see the tanney. If someone is cloven then they see the beverly. If someone martyr the adaline then they are cloven. If someone martyr the adaline then they are nilotic. If the adaline martyr the beverly and the adaline is not cloven then the adaline does not like the beverly. The tanney is nilotic.", "logic": "\nMartyr(tanney, adaline)\nCastle(adaline, beverly)\nnot Fervid(beverly)\nforall x (Martyr(x, beverly) -> Paradisiac(beverly))\nforall x (Martyr(x, adaline) and Castle(adaline, tanney) -> Martyr(x, tanney))\nforall x (Cloven(x) -> Martyr(x, beverly))\nforall x (Martyr(x, adaline) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Martyr(x, adaline) -> Nilotic(x))\nMartyr(adaline, beverly) and not Cloven(adaline) -> not Inculpate(adaline, beverly)\n\nNilotic(tanney)\n\nMartyr(tanney, adaline) and forall x (Martyr(x, adaline) -> Nilotic(x)) -> therefore Nilotic(tanney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The clarita inactivate the heinrich. The heinrich steel the karlotta. The karlotta is not eastern. If someone inactivate the karlotta then the karlotta is pristine. If someone inactivate the heinrich and the heinrich steel the clarita then they see the clarita. If someone is mundane then they see the karlotta. If someone inactivate the heinrich then they are mundane. If someone inactivate the heinrich then they are beaklike. If the heinrich inactivate the karlotta and the heinrich is not mundane then the heinrich does not like the karlotta. The clarita is not mundane.", "logic": "\nInactivate(clarita, heinrich)\nSteel(heinrich, karlotta)\nnot Eastern(karlotta)\nforall x (Inactivate(x, karlotta) -> Pristine(karlotta))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, heinrich) and Steel(heinrich, clarita) -> Inactivate(x, clarita))\nforall x (Mundane(x) -> Inactivate(x, karlotta))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, heinrich) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, heinrich) -> Beaklike(x))\nInactivate(heinrich, karlotta) and not Mundane(heinrich) -> not Enwrap(heinrich, karlotta)\n\nnot Mundane(clarita)\n\nInactivate(clarita, heinrich) and forall x (Inactivate(x, heinrich) -> Mundane(x)) -> therefore Mundane(clarita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The hamid cling the barth. The barth upload the shanna. The shanna is not fuscous. If someone cling the shanna then the shanna is stomatous. If someone cling the barth and the barth upload the hamid then they see the hamid. If someone is brachial then they see the shanna. If someone cling the barth then they are brachial. If someone cling the barth then they are mucosal. If the barth cling the shanna and the barth is not brachial then the barth does not like the shanna. The hamid cling the shanna.", "logic": "\nCling(hamid, barth)\nUpload(barth, shanna)\nnot Fuscous(shanna)\nforall x (Cling(x, shanna) -> Stomatous(shanna))\nforall x (Cling(x, barth) and Upload(barth, hamid) -> Cling(x, hamid))\nforall x (Brachial(x) -> Cling(x, shanna))\nforall x (Cling(x, barth) -> Brachial(x))\nforall x (Cling(x, barth) -> Mucosal(x))\nCling(barth, shanna) and not Brachial(barth) -> not Study(barth, shanna)\n\nCling(hamid, shanna)\n\nCling(hamid, barth) and forall x (Cling(x, barth) -> Brachial(x)) -> therefore Brachial(hamid) Brachial(hamid) and forall x (Brachial(x) -> Cling(x, shanna)) -> therefore Cling(hamid, shanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The cristi scrabble the holli. The holli blossom the joanna. The joanna is not septic. If someone scrabble the joanna then the joanna is scoreless. If someone scrabble the holli and the holli blossom the cristi then they see the cristi. If someone is intoxicant then they see the joanna. If someone scrabble the holli then they are intoxicant. If someone scrabble the holli then they are venerating. If the holli scrabble the joanna and the holli is not intoxicant then the holli does not like the joanna. The cristi does not see the joanna.", "logic": "\nScrabble(cristi, holli)\nBlossom(holli, joanna)\nnot Septic(joanna)\nforall x (Scrabble(x, joanna) -> Scoreless(joanna))\nforall x (Scrabble(x, holli) and Blossom(holli, cristi) -> Scrabble(x, cristi))\nforall x (Intoxicant(x) -> Scrabble(x, joanna))\nforall x (Scrabble(x, holli) -> Intoxicant(x))\nforall x (Scrabble(x, holli) -> Venerating(x))\nScrabble(holli, joanna) and not Intoxicant(holli) -> not Overdose(holli, joanna)\n\nnot Scrabble(cristi, joanna)\n\nScrabble(cristi, holli) and forall x (Scrabble(x, holli) -> Intoxicant(x)) -> therefore Intoxicant(cristi) Intoxicant(cristi) and forall x (Intoxicant(x) -> Scrabble(x, joanna)) -> therefore Scrabble(cristi, joanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The hamlin libel the renie. The renie plank the lenny. The lenny is not gripping. If someone libel the lenny then the lenny is askew. If someone libel the renie and the renie plank the hamlin then they see the hamlin. If someone is leisurely then they see the lenny. If someone libel the renie then they are leisurely. If someone libel the renie then they are reviving. If the renie libel the lenny and the renie is not leisurely then the renie does not like the lenny. The hamlin does not see the hamlin.", "logic": "\nLibel(hamlin, renie)\nPlank(renie, lenny)\nnot Gripping(lenny)\nforall x (Libel(x, lenny) -> Askew(lenny))\nforall x (Libel(x, renie) and Plank(renie, hamlin) -> Libel(x, hamlin))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> Libel(x, lenny))\nforall x (Libel(x, renie) -> Leisurely(x))\nforall x (Libel(x, renie) -> Reviving(x))\nLibel(renie, lenny) and not Leisurely(renie) -> not Bunt(renie, lenny)\n\nnot Libel(hamlin, hamlin)\n\nforall x (Libel(x, renie) and Plank(renie, hamlin) -> Libel(x, hamlin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The mitra smother the kata. The kata leverage the georgy. The georgy is not redeemed. If someone smother the georgy then the georgy is visaged. If someone smother the kata and the kata leverage the mitra then they see the mitra. If someone is sixth then they see the georgy. If someone smother the kata then they are sixth. If someone smother the kata then they are creditable. If the kata smother the georgy and the kata is not sixth then the kata does not like the georgy. The georgy smother the mitra.", "logic": "\nSmother(mitra, kata)\nLeverage(kata, georgy)\nnot Redeemed(georgy)\nforall x (Smother(x, georgy) -> Visaged(georgy))\nforall x (Smother(x, kata) and Leverage(kata, mitra) -> Smother(x, mitra))\nforall x (Sixth(x) -> Smother(x, georgy))\nforall x (Smother(x, kata) -> Sixth(x))\nforall x (Smother(x, kata) -> Creditable(x))\nSmother(kata, georgy) and not Sixth(kata) -> not List(kata, georgy)\n\nSmother(georgy, mitra)\n\nforall x (Smother(x, kata) and Leverage(kata, mitra) -> Smother(x, mitra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The colin enthrone the zolly. The zolly reverence the sabrina. The sabrina is not luminous. If someone enthrone the sabrina then the sabrina is disorderly. If someone enthrone the zolly and the zolly reverence the colin then they see the colin. If someone is broadside then they see the sabrina. If someone enthrone the zolly then they are broadside. If someone enthrone the zolly then they are romanian. If the zolly enthrone the sabrina and the zolly is not broadside then the zolly does not like the sabrina. The sabrina is not romanian.", "logic": "\nEnthrone(colin, zolly)\nReverence(zolly, sabrina)\nnot Luminous(sabrina)\nforall x (Enthrone(x, sabrina) -> Disorderly(sabrina))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, zolly) and Reverence(zolly, colin) -> Enthrone(x, colin))\nforall x (Broadside(x) -> Enthrone(x, sabrina))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, zolly) -> Broadside(x))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, zolly) -> Romanian(x))\nEnthrone(zolly, sabrina) and not Broadside(zolly) -> not Wait(zolly, sabrina)\n\nnot Romanian(sabrina)\n\nforall x (Enthrone(x, zolly) -> Romanian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The patin crick the stacee. The stacee divert the krystal. The krystal is not long. If someone crick the krystal then the krystal is natty. If someone crick the stacee and the stacee divert the patin then they see the patin. If someone is cushioned then they see the krystal. If someone crick the stacee then they are cushioned. If someone crick the stacee then they are ecdemic. If the stacee crick the krystal and the stacee is not cushioned then the stacee does not like the krystal. The stacee scrawl the patin.", "logic": "\nCrick(patin, stacee)\nDivert(stacee, krystal)\nnot Long(krystal)\nforall x (Crick(x, krystal) -> Natty(krystal))\nforall x (Crick(x, stacee) and Divert(stacee, patin) -> Crick(x, patin))\nforall x (Cushioned(x) -> Crick(x, krystal))\nforall x (Crick(x, stacee) -> Cushioned(x))\nforall x (Crick(x, stacee) -> Ecdemic(x))\nCrick(stacee, krystal) and not Cushioned(stacee) -> not Scrawl(stacee, krystal)\n\nScrawl(stacee, patin)\n\nScrawl(stacee, patin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The cornela shoo the nomi. The nomi resorb the delinda. The delinda is not mistreated. If someone shoo the delinda then the delinda is leading. If someone shoo the nomi and the nomi resorb the cornela then they see the cornela. If someone is calicular then they see the delinda. If someone shoo the nomi then they are calicular. If someone shoo the nomi then they are magnified. If the nomi shoo the delinda and the nomi is not calicular then the nomi does not like the delinda. The nomi is not leading.", "logic": "\nShoo(cornela, nomi)\nResorb(nomi, delinda)\nnot Mistreated(delinda)\nforall x (Shoo(x, delinda) -> Leading(delinda))\nforall x (Shoo(x, nomi) and Resorb(nomi, cornela) -> Shoo(x, cornela))\nforall x (Calicular(x) -> Shoo(x, delinda))\nforall x (Shoo(x, nomi) -> Calicular(x))\nforall x (Shoo(x, nomi) -> Magnified(x))\nShoo(nomi, delinda) and not Calicular(nomi) -> not Angle(nomi, delinda)\n\nnot Leading(nomi)\n\nnot Leading(nomi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The dimitrou initialise the tomasine. The tomasine erode the anica. The anica is not minatory. If someone initialise the anica then the anica is steamed. If someone initialise the tomasine and the tomasine erode the dimitrou then they see the dimitrou. If someone is setose then they see the anica. If someone initialise the tomasine then they are setose. If someone initialise the tomasine then they are cushiony. If the tomasine initialise the anica and the tomasine is not setose then the tomasine does not like the anica. The tomasine is minatory.", "logic": "\nInitialise(dimitrou, tomasine)\nErode(tomasine, anica)\nnot Minatory(anica)\nforall x (Initialise(x, anica) -> Steamed(anica))\nforall x (Initialise(x, tomasine) and Erode(tomasine, dimitrou) -> Initialise(x, dimitrou))\nforall x (Setose(x) -> Initialise(x, anica))\nforall x (Initialise(x, tomasine) -> Setose(x))\nforall x (Initialise(x, tomasine) -> Cushiony(x))\nInitialise(tomasine, anica) and not Setose(tomasine) -> not Coquette(tomasine, anica)\n\nMinatory(tomasine)\n\nMinatory(tomasine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-869"} {"premises": "The vivyan warp the rosalinda. The rosalinda is wired. The rosalinda warp the vivyan. If something warp the rosalinda and it warp the vivyan then it exposit the vivyan. If something warp the rosalinda then it warp the vivyan. If something dine the vivyan and it dine the rosalinda then the rosalinda dine the vivyan. If something exposit the vivyan then the vivyan dine the rosalinda. If something is prismatic and it dine the rosalinda then the rosalinda is chaldee. If something dine the rosalinda and it dine the vivyan then the rosalinda is wired. The rosalinda warp the vivyan.", "logic": "\nWarp(vivyan, rosalinda)\nWired(rosalinda)\nWarp(rosalinda, vivyan)\nforall x (Warp(x, rosalinda) and Warp(x, vivyan) -> Exposit(x, vivyan))\nforall x (Warp(x, rosalinda) -> Warp(x, vivyan))\nforall x (Dine(x, vivyan) and Dine(x, rosalinda) -> Dine(rosalinda, vivyan))\nforall x (Exposit(x, vivyan) -> Dine(vivyan, rosalinda))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) and Dine(x, rosalinda) -> Chaldee(rosalinda))\nforall x (Dine(x, rosalinda) and Dine(x, vivyan) -> Wired(rosalinda))\n\nWarp(rosalinda, vivyan)\n\ntherefore Warp(rosalinda, vivyan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The xymenes disdain the inesita. The inesita is piebald. The inesita disdain the xymenes. If something disdain the inesita and it disdain the xymenes then it lactate the xymenes. If something disdain the inesita then it disdain the xymenes. If something squash the xymenes and it squash the inesita then the inesita squash the xymenes. If something lactate the xymenes then the xymenes squash the inesita. If something is burked and it squash the inesita then the inesita is overproud. If something squash the inesita and it squash the xymenes then the inesita is piebald. The inesita does not like the xymenes.", "logic": "\nDisdain(xymenes, inesita)\nPiebald(inesita)\nDisdain(inesita, xymenes)\nforall x (Disdain(x, inesita) and Disdain(x, xymenes) -> Lactate(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Disdain(x, inesita) -> Disdain(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Squash(x, xymenes) and Squash(x, inesita) -> Squash(inesita, xymenes))\nforall x (Lactate(x, xymenes) -> Squash(xymenes, inesita))\nforall x (Burked(x) and Squash(x, inesita) -> Overproud(inesita))\nforall x (Squash(x, inesita) and Squash(x, xymenes) -> Piebald(inesita))\n\nnot Disdain(inesita, xymenes)\n\ntherefore Disdain(inesita, xymenes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The melody romance the sybila. The sybila is timeless. The sybila romance the melody. If something romance the sybila and it romance the melody then it satisfise the melody. If something romance the sybila then it romance the melody. If something deregulate the melody and it deregulate the sybila then the sybila deregulate the melody. If something satisfise the melody then the melody deregulate the sybila. If something is focused and it deregulate the sybila then the sybila is laboured. If something deregulate the sybila and it deregulate the melody then the sybila is timeless. The melody romance the melody.", "logic": "\nRomance(melody, sybila)\nTimeless(sybila)\nRomance(sybila, melody)\nforall x (Romance(x, sybila) and Romance(x, melody) -> Satisfise(x, melody))\nforall x (Romance(x, sybila) -> Romance(x, melody))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, melody) and Deregulate(x, sybila) -> Deregulate(sybila, melody))\nforall x (Satisfise(x, melody) -> Deregulate(melody, sybila))\nforall x (Focused(x) and Deregulate(x, sybila) -> Laboured(sybila))\nforall x (Deregulate(x, sybila) and Deregulate(x, melody) -> Timeless(sybila))\n\nRomance(melody, melody)\n\nRomance(melody, sybila) and forall x (Romance(x, sybila) -> Romance(x, melody)) -> therefore Romance(melody, melody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The berte astrogate the linea. The linea is odorless. The linea astrogate the berte. If something astrogate the linea and it astrogate the berte then it purl the berte. If something astrogate the linea then it astrogate the berte. If something temporise the berte and it temporise the linea then the linea temporise the berte. If something purl the berte then the berte temporise the linea. If something is completing and it temporise the linea then the linea is liberal. If something temporise the linea and it temporise the berte then the linea is odorless. The berte does not like the berte.", "logic": "\nAstrogate(berte, linea)\nOdorless(linea)\nAstrogate(linea, berte)\nforall x (Astrogate(x, linea) and Astrogate(x, berte) -> Purl(x, berte))\nforall x (Astrogate(x, linea) -> Astrogate(x, berte))\nforall x (Temporise(x, berte) and Temporise(x, linea) -> Temporise(linea, berte))\nforall x (Purl(x, berte) -> Temporise(berte, linea))\nforall x (Completing(x) and Temporise(x, linea) -> Liberal(linea))\nforall x (Temporise(x, linea) and Temporise(x, berte) -> Odorless(linea))\n\nnot Astrogate(berte, berte)\n\nAstrogate(berte, linea) and forall x (Astrogate(x, linea) -> Astrogate(x, berte)) -> therefore Astrogate(berte, berte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The kitti flock the chelsy. The chelsy is medium. The chelsy flock the kitti. If something flock the chelsy and it flock the kitti then it blind the kitti. If something flock the chelsy then it flock the kitti. If something skid the kitti and it skid the chelsy then the chelsy skid the kitti. If something blind the kitti then the kitti skid the chelsy. If something is calycular and it skid the chelsy then the chelsy is patched. If something skid the chelsy and it skid the kitti then the chelsy is medium. The kitti blind the kitti.", "logic": "\nFlock(kitti, chelsy)\nMedium(chelsy)\nFlock(chelsy, kitti)\nforall x (Flock(x, chelsy) and Flock(x, kitti) -> Blind(x, kitti))\nforall x (Flock(x, chelsy) -> Flock(x, kitti))\nforall x (Skid(x, kitti) and Skid(x, chelsy) -> Skid(chelsy, kitti))\nforall x (Blind(x, kitti) -> Skid(kitti, chelsy))\nforall x (Calycular(x) and Skid(x, chelsy) -> Patched(chelsy))\nforall x (Skid(x, chelsy) and Skid(x, kitti) -> Medium(chelsy))\n\nBlind(kitti, kitti)\n\nFlock(kitti, chelsy) and forall x (Flock(x, chelsy) -> Flock(x, kitti)) -> therefore Flock(kitti, kitti) Flock(kitti, chelsy) and Flock(kitti, kitti) and forall x (Flock(x, chelsy) and Flock(x, kitti) -> Blind(x, kitti)) -> therefore Blind(kitti, kitti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The romonda task the nadean. The nadean is viral. The nadean task the romonda. If something task the nadean and it task the romonda then it excuse the romonda. If something task the nadean then it task the romonda. If something sigh the romonda and it sigh the nadean then the nadean sigh the romonda. If something excuse the romonda then the romonda sigh the nadean. If something is cellular and it sigh the nadean then the nadean is prosthetic. If something sigh the nadean and it sigh the romonda then the nadean is viral. The romonda does not visit the romonda.", "logic": "\nTask(romonda, nadean)\nViral(nadean)\nTask(nadean, romonda)\nforall x (Task(x, nadean) and Task(x, romonda) -> Excuse(x, romonda))\nforall x (Task(x, nadean) -> Task(x, romonda))\nforall x (Sigh(x, romonda) and Sigh(x, nadean) -> Sigh(nadean, romonda))\nforall x (Excuse(x, romonda) -> Sigh(romonda, nadean))\nforall x (Cellular(x) and Sigh(x, nadean) -> Prosthetic(nadean))\nforall x (Sigh(x, nadean) and Sigh(x, romonda) -> Viral(nadean))\n\nnot Excuse(romonda, romonda)\n\nTask(romonda, nadean) and forall x (Task(x, nadean) -> Task(x, romonda)) -> therefore Task(romonda, romonda) Task(romonda, nadean) and Task(romonda, romonda) and forall x (Task(x, nadean) and Task(x, romonda) -> Excuse(x, romonda)) -> therefore Excuse(romonda, romonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The nicolas yank the ranna. The ranna is lowering. The ranna yank the nicolas. If something yank the ranna and it yank the nicolas then it daze the nicolas. If something yank the ranna then it yank the nicolas. If something mention the nicolas and it mention the ranna then the ranna mention the nicolas. If something daze the nicolas then the nicolas mention the ranna. If something is agape and it mention the ranna then the ranna is nazi. If something mention the ranna and it mention the nicolas then the ranna is lowering. The nicolas mention the ranna.", "logic": "\nYank(nicolas, ranna)\nLowering(ranna)\nYank(ranna, nicolas)\nforall x (Yank(x, ranna) and Yank(x, nicolas) -> Daze(x, nicolas))\nforall x (Yank(x, ranna) -> Yank(x, nicolas))\nforall x (Mention(x, nicolas) and Mention(x, ranna) -> Mention(ranna, nicolas))\nforall x (Daze(x, nicolas) -> Mention(nicolas, ranna))\nforall x (Agape(x) and Mention(x, ranna) -> Nazi(ranna))\nforall x (Mention(x, ranna) and Mention(x, nicolas) -> Lowering(ranna))\n\nMention(nicolas, ranna)\n\nYank(nicolas, ranna) and forall x (Yank(x, ranna) -> Yank(x, nicolas)) -> therefore Yank(nicolas, nicolas) Yank(nicolas, ranna) and Yank(nicolas, nicolas) and forall x (Yank(x, ranna) and Yank(x, nicolas) -> Daze(x, nicolas)) -> therefore Daze(nicolas, nicolas) Daze(nicolas, nicolas) and forall x (Daze(x, nicolas) -> Mention(nicolas, ranna)) -> therefore Mention(nicolas, ranna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The viviana undervalue the kimberli. The kimberli is bibbed. The kimberli undervalue the viviana. If something undervalue the kimberli and it undervalue the viviana then it restrict the viviana. If something undervalue the kimberli then it undervalue the viviana. If something bleep the viviana and it bleep the kimberli then the kimberli bleep the viviana. If something restrict the viviana then the viviana bleep the kimberli. If something is duodenal and it bleep the kimberli then the kimberli is boylike. If something bleep the kimberli and it bleep the viviana then the kimberli is bibbed. The viviana does not chase the kimberli.", "logic": "\nUndervalue(viviana, kimberli)\nBibbed(kimberli)\nUndervalue(kimberli, viviana)\nforall x (Undervalue(x, kimberli) and Undervalue(x, viviana) -> Restrict(x, viviana))\nforall x (Undervalue(x, kimberli) -> Undervalue(x, viviana))\nforall x (Bleep(x, viviana) and Bleep(x, kimberli) -> Bleep(kimberli, viviana))\nforall x (Restrict(x, viviana) -> Bleep(viviana, kimberli))\nforall x (Duodenal(x) and Bleep(x, kimberli) -> Boylike(kimberli))\nforall x (Bleep(x, kimberli) and Bleep(x, viviana) -> Bibbed(kimberli))\n\nnot Bleep(viviana, kimberli)\n\nUndervalue(viviana, kimberli) and forall x (Undervalue(x, kimberli) -> Undervalue(x, viviana)) -> therefore Undervalue(viviana, viviana) Undervalue(viviana, kimberli) and Undervalue(viviana, viviana) and forall x (Undervalue(x, kimberli) and Undervalue(x, viviana) -> Restrict(x, viviana)) -> therefore Restrict(viviana, viviana) Restrict(viviana, viviana) and forall x (Restrict(x, viviana) -> Bleep(viviana, kimberli)) -> therefore Bleep(viviana, kimberli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The wildon season the edithe. The edithe is yellowish. The edithe season the wildon. If something season the edithe and it season the wildon then it savage the wildon. If something season the edithe then it season the wildon. If something swipe the wildon and it swipe the edithe then the edithe swipe the wildon. If something savage the wildon then the wildon swipe the edithe. If something is autologous and it swipe the edithe then the edithe is endovenous. If something swipe the edithe and it swipe the wildon then the edithe is yellowish. The edithe does not chase the wildon.", "logic": "\nSeason(wildon, edithe)\nYellowish(edithe)\nSeason(edithe, wildon)\nforall x (Season(x, edithe) and Season(x, wildon) -> Savage(x, wildon))\nforall x (Season(x, edithe) -> Season(x, wildon))\nforall x (Swipe(x, wildon) and Swipe(x, edithe) -> Swipe(edithe, wildon))\nforall x (Savage(x, wildon) -> Swipe(wildon, edithe))\nforall x (Autologous(x) and Swipe(x, edithe) -> Endovenous(edithe))\nforall x (Swipe(x, edithe) and Swipe(x, wildon) -> Yellowish(edithe))\n\nnot Swipe(edithe, wildon)\n\nforall x (Swipe(x, wildon) and Swipe(x, edithe) -> Swipe(edithe, wildon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The carena fake the claudie. The claudie is prevailing. The claudie fake the carena. If something fake the claudie and it fake the carena then it insinuate the carena. If something fake the claudie then it fake the carena. If something gape the carena and it gape the claudie then the claudie gape the carena. If something insinuate the carena then the carena gape the claudie. If something is speaking and it gape the claudie then the claudie is lengthened. If something gape the claudie and it gape the carena then the claudie is prevailing. The claudie is lengthened.", "logic": "\nFake(carena, claudie)\nPrevailing(claudie)\nFake(claudie, carena)\nforall x (Fake(x, claudie) and Fake(x, carena) -> Insinuate(x, carena))\nforall x (Fake(x, claudie) -> Fake(x, carena))\nforall x (Gape(x, carena) and Gape(x, claudie) -> Gape(claudie, carena))\nforall x (Insinuate(x, carena) -> Gape(carena, claudie))\nforall x (Speaking(x) and Gape(x, claudie) -> Lengthened(claudie))\nforall x (Gape(x, claudie) and Gape(x, carena) -> Prevailing(claudie))\n\nLengthened(claudie)\n\nforall x (Speaking(x) and Gape(x, claudie) -> Lengthened(claudie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The frederick digitalise the leisha. The leisha is quixotic. The leisha digitalise the frederick. If something digitalise the leisha and it digitalise the frederick then it grimace the frederick. If something digitalise the leisha then it digitalise the frederick. If something prop the frederick and it prop the leisha then the leisha prop the frederick. If something grimace the frederick then the frederick prop the leisha. If something is influent and it prop the leisha then the leisha is scrupulous. If something prop the leisha and it prop the frederick then the leisha is quixotic. The leisha does not visit the frederick.", "logic": "\nDigitalise(frederick, leisha)\nQuixotic(leisha)\nDigitalise(leisha, frederick)\nforall x (Digitalise(x, leisha) and Digitalise(x, frederick) -> Grimace(x, frederick))\nforall x (Digitalise(x, leisha) -> Digitalise(x, frederick))\nforall x (Prop(x, frederick) and Prop(x, leisha) -> Prop(leisha, frederick))\nforall x (Grimace(x, frederick) -> Prop(frederick, leisha))\nforall x (Influent(x) and Prop(x, leisha) -> Scrupulous(leisha))\nforall x (Prop(x, leisha) and Prop(x, frederick) -> Quixotic(leisha))\n\nnot Grimace(leisha, frederick)\n\nforall x (Digitalise(x, leisha) and Digitalise(x, frederick) -> Grimace(x, frederick)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The audrye caravan the barnebas. The barnebas is unforeseen. The barnebas caravan the audrye. If something caravan the barnebas and it caravan the audrye then it rick the audrye. If something caravan the barnebas then it caravan the audrye. If something swell the audrye and it swell the barnebas then the barnebas swell the audrye. If something rick the audrye then the audrye swell the barnebas. If something is kayoed and it swell the barnebas then the barnebas is opposite. If something swell the barnebas and it swell the audrye then the barnebas is unforeseen. The audrye rick the barnebas.", "logic": "\nCaravan(audrye, barnebas)\nUnforeseen(barnebas)\nCaravan(barnebas, audrye)\nforall x (Caravan(x, barnebas) and Caravan(x, audrye) -> Rick(x, audrye))\nforall x (Caravan(x, barnebas) -> Caravan(x, audrye))\nforall x (Swell(x, audrye) and Swell(x, barnebas) -> Swell(barnebas, audrye))\nforall x (Rick(x, audrye) -> Swell(audrye, barnebas))\nforall x (Kayoed(x) and Swell(x, barnebas) -> Opposite(barnebas))\nforall x (Swell(x, barnebas) and Swell(x, audrye) -> Unforeseen(barnebas))\n\nRick(audrye, barnebas)\n\nRick(audrye, barnebas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The sile overbid the samaria. The samaria is deathless. The samaria overbid the sile. If something overbid the samaria and it overbid the sile then it disinherit the sile. If something overbid the samaria then it overbid the sile. If something enucleate the sile and it enucleate the samaria then the samaria enucleate the sile. If something disinherit the sile then the sile enucleate the samaria. If something is harried and it enucleate the samaria then the samaria is extensible. If something enucleate the samaria and it enucleate the sile then the samaria is deathless. The samaria is not blue.", "logic": "\nOverbid(sile, samaria)\nDeathless(samaria)\nOverbid(samaria, sile)\nforall x (Overbid(x, samaria) and Overbid(x, sile) -> Disinherit(x, sile))\nforall x (Overbid(x, samaria) -> Overbid(x, sile))\nforall x (Enucleate(x, sile) and Enucleate(x, samaria) -> Enucleate(samaria, sile))\nforall x (Disinherit(x, sile) -> Enucleate(sile, samaria))\nforall x (Harried(x) and Enucleate(x, samaria) -> Extensible(samaria))\nforall x (Enucleate(x, samaria) and Enucleate(x, sile) -> Deathless(samaria))\n\nnot Blue(samaria)\n\nnot Blue(samaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The lucia swathe the heinz. The heinz is ambagious. The heinz swathe the lucia. If something swathe the heinz and it swathe the lucia then it nuzzle the lucia. If something swathe the heinz then it swathe the lucia. If something winnow the lucia and it winnow the heinz then the heinz winnow the lucia. If something nuzzle the lucia then the lucia winnow the heinz. If something is automated and it winnow the heinz then the heinz is kittenish. If something winnow the heinz and it winnow the lucia then the heinz is ambagious. The lucia is ambagious.", "logic": "\nSwathe(lucia, heinz)\nAmbagious(heinz)\nSwathe(heinz, lucia)\nforall x (Swathe(x, heinz) and Swathe(x, lucia) -> Nuzzle(x, lucia))\nforall x (Swathe(x, heinz) -> Swathe(x, lucia))\nforall x (Winnow(x, lucia) and Winnow(x, heinz) -> Winnow(heinz, lucia))\nforall x (Nuzzle(x, lucia) -> Winnow(lucia, heinz))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Winnow(x, heinz) -> Kittenish(heinz))\nforall x (Winnow(x, heinz) and Winnow(x, lucia) -> Ambagious(heinz))\n\nAmbagious(lucia)\n\nAmbagious(lucia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The dolora contemn the fernande. The fernande is dissonant. The fernande contemn the dolora. If something contemn the fernande and it contemn the dolora then it reinsure the dolora. If something contemn the fernande then it contemn the dolora. If something smudge the dolora and it smudge the fernande then the fernande smudge the dolora. If something reinsure the dolora then the dolora smudge the fernande. If something is mesmerized and it smudge the fernande then the fernande is aimless. If something smudge the fernande and it smudge the dolora then the fernande is dissonant. The fernande does not chase the fernande.", "logic": "\nContemn(dolora, fernande)\nDissonant(fernande)\nContemn(fernande, dolora)\nforall x (Contemn(x, fernande) and Contemn(x, dolora) -> Reinsure(x, dolora))\nforall x (Contemn(x, fernande) -> Contemn(x, dolora))\nforall x (Smudge(x, dolora) and Smudge(x, fernande) -> Smudge(fernande, dolora))\nforall x (Reinsure(x, dolora) -> Smudge(dolora, fernande))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Smudge(x, fernande) -> Aimless(fernande))\nforall x (Smudge(x, fernande) and Smudge(x, dolora) -> Dissonant(fernande))\n\nnot Smudge(fernande, fernande)\n\nnot Smudge(fernande, fernande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "The graig overtax the tiphanie. The tiphanie is groovy. The tiphanie overtax the graig. If something overtax the tiphanie and it overtax the graig then it congest the graig. If something overtax the tiphanie then it overtax the graig. If something guess the graig and it guess the tiphanie then the tiphanie guess the graig. If something congest the graig then the graig guess the tiphanie. If something is recherche and it guess the tiphanie then the tiphanie is unflagging. If something guess the tiphanie and it guess the graig then the tiphanie is groovy. The graig is cold.", "logic": "\nOvertax(graig, tiphanie)\nGroovy(tiphanie)\nOvertax(tiphanie, graig)\nforall x (Overtax(x, tiphanie) and Overtax(x, graig) -> Congest(x, graig))\nforall x (Overtax(x, tiphanie) -> Overtax(x, graig))\nforall x (Guess(x, graig) and Guess(x, tiphanie) -> Guess(tiphanie, graig))\nforall x (Congest(x, graig) -> Guess(graig, tiphanie))\nforall x (Recherche(x) and Guess(x, tiphanie) -> Unflagging(tiphanie))\nforall x (Guess(x, tiphanie) and Guess(x, graig) -> Groovy(tiphanie))\n\nCold(graig)\n\nCold(graig) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-733"} {"premises": "Laina is reclusive. Laina is not endemic. Laina is biennial. Cold things are biennial. If Laina is reclusive and Laina is hebdomadal then Laina is witching. Furry things are hebdomadal. If something is hebdomadal and not biennial then it is incurvate. If something is hebdomadal and not lazy then it is incurvate. Cold, reclusive things are not incurvate. Laina is biennial.", "logic": "\nReclusive(laina)\nnot Endemic(laina)\nBiennial(laina)\nforall x (Witching(x) -> Biennial(x))\nReclusive(laina) and Hebdomadal(laina) -> Witching(laina)\nforall x (Reclusive(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and not Biennial(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and not Lazy(x) -> Incurvate(x))\nforall x (Witching(x) and Reclusive(x) -> not Incurvate(x))\n\nBiennial(laina)\n\ntherefore Biennial(laina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Loleta is profitable. Loleta is not ominous. Loleta is watery. Cold things are watery. If Loleta is profitable and Loleta is viewable then Loleta is pyrectic. Furry things are viewable. If something is viewable and not watery then it is adjunct. If something is viewable and not baking then it is adjunct. Cold, profitable things are not adjunct. Loleta is not profitable.", "logic": "\nProfitable(loleta)\nnot Ominous(loleta)\nWatery(loleta)\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) -> Watery(x))\nProfitable(loleta) and Viewable(loleta) -> Pyrectic(loleta)\nforall x (Profitable(x) -> Viewable(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) and not Watery(x) -> Adjunct(x))\nforall x (Viewable(x) and not Baking(x) -> Adjunct(x))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) and Profitable(x) -> not Adjunct(x))\n\nnot Profitable(loleta)\n\ntherefore Profitable(loleta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Gustavo is lenten. Gustavo is not rotted. Gustavo is moist. Cold things are moist. If Gustavo is lenten and Gustavo is typic then Gustavo is hurried. Furry things are typic. If something is typic and not moist then it is lvii. If something is typic and not assailable then it is lvii. Cold, lenten things are not lvii. Gustavo is typic.", "logic": "\nLenten(gustavo)\nnot Rotted(gustavo)\nMoist(gustavo)\nforall x (Hurried(x) -> Moist(x))\nLenten(gustavo) and Typic(gustavo) -> Hurried(gustavo)\nforall x (Lenten(x) -> Typic(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) and not Moist(x) -> Lvii(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) and not Assailable(x) -> Lvii(x))\nforall x (Hurried(x) and Lenten(x) -> not Lvii(x))\n\nTypic(gustavo)\n\nLenten(gustavo) and forall x (Lenten(x) -> Typic(x)) -> therefore Typic(gustavo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Giraldo is polite. Giraldo is not clement. Giraldo is skintight. Cold things are skintight. If Giraldo is polite and Giraldo is treelike then Giraldo is incertain. Furry things are treelike. If something is treelike and not skintight then it is augmented. If something is treelike and not stooped then it is augmented. Cold, polite things are not augmented. Giraldo is not treelike.", "logic": "\nPolite(giraldo)\nnot Clement(giraldo)\nSkintight(giraldo)\nforall x (Incertain(x) -> Skintight(x))\nPolite(giraldo) and Treelike(giraldo) -> Incertain(giraldo)\nforall x (Polite(x) -> Treelike(x))\nforall x (Treelike(x) and not Skintight(x) -> Augmented(x))\nforall x (Treelike(x) and not Stooped(x) -> Augmented(x))\nforall x (Incertain(x) and Polite(x) -> not Augmented(x))\n\nnot Treelike(giraldo)\n\nPolite(giraldo) and forall x (Polite(x) -> Treelike(x)) -> therefore Treelike(giraldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Tabbatha is punishable. Tabbatha is not willowy. Tabbatha is demonic. Cold things are demonic. If Tabbatha is punishable and Tabbatha is repellant then Tabbatha is ghanian. Furry things are repellant. If something is repellant and not demonic then it is seeing. If something is repellant and not outgoing then it is seeing. Cold, punishable things are not seeing. Tabbatha is ghanian.", "logic": "\nPunishable(tabbatha)\nnot Willowy(tabbatha)\nDemonic(tabbatha)\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Demonic(x))\nPunishable(tabbatha) and Repellant(tabbatha) -> Ghanian(tabbatha)\nforall x (Punishable(x) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and not Demonic(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and not Outgoing(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) and Punishable(x) -> not Seeing(x))\n\nGhanian(tabbatha)\n\nPunishable(tabbatha) and forall x (Punishable(x) -> Repellant(x)) -> therefore Repellant(tabbatha) Punishable(tabbatha) and Repellant(tabbatha) and Punishable(tabbatha) and Repellant(tabbatha) -> Ghanian(tabbatha) -> therefore Ghanian(tabbatha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Terrence is traceable. Terrence is not staged. Terrence is metal. Cold things are metal. If Terrence is traceable and Terrence is overjoyed then Terrence is zonary. Furry things are overjoyed. If something is overjoyed and not metal then it is admired. If something is overjoyed and not expired then it is admired. Cold, traceable things are not admired. Terrence is not zonary.", "logic": "\nTraceable(terrence)\nnot Staged(terrence)\nMetal(terrence)\nforall x (Zonary(x) -> Metal(x))\nTraceable(terrence) and Overjoyed(terrence) -> Zonary(terrence)\nforall x (Traceable(x) -> Overjoyed(x))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) and not Metal(x) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) and not Expired(x) -> Admired(x))\nforall x (Zonary(x) and Traceable(x) -> not Admired(x))\n\nnot Zonary(terrence)\n\nTraceable(terrence) and forall x (Traceable(x) -> Overjoyed(x)) -> therefore Overjoyed(terrence) Traceable(terrence) and Overjoyed(terrence) and Traceable(terrence) and Overjoyed(terrence) -> Zonary(terrence) -> therefore Zonary(terrence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Kaia is antitumor. Kaia is not meaningful. Kaia is hospitable. Cold things are hospitable. If Kaia is antitumor and Kaia is wailful then Kaia is uncomplete. Furry things are wailful. If something is wailful and not hospitable then it is dear. If something is wailful and not diametral then it is dear. Cold, antitumor things are not dear. Kaia is not dear.", "logic": "\nAntitumor(kaia)\nnot Meaningful(kaia)\nHospitable(kaia)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Hospitable(x))\nAntitumor(kaia) and Wailful(kaia) -> Uncomplete(kaia)\nforall x (Antitumor(x) -> Wailful(x))\nforall x (Wailful(x) and not Hospitable(x) -> Dear(x))\nforall x (Wailful(x) and not Diametral(x) -> Dear(x))\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) and Antitumor(x) -> not Dear(x))\n\nnot Dear(kaia)\n\nAntitumor(kaia) and forall x (Antitumor(x) -> Wailful(x)) -> therefore Wailful(kaia) Antitumor(kaia) and Wailful(kaia) and Antitumor(kaia) and Wailful(kaia) -> Uncomplete(kaia) -> therefore Uncomplete(kaia) Uncomplete(kaia) and Antitumor(kaia) and forall x (Uncomplete(x) and Antitumor(x) -> not Dear(x)) -> therefore not Dear(kaia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Else is lunatic. Else is not cystic. Else is hitless. Cold things are hitless. If Else is lunatic and Else is violative then Else is hebridean. Furry things are violative. If something is violative and not hitless then it is ruthful. If something is violative and not acrogenic then it is ruthful. Cold, lunatic things are not ruthful. Else is ruthful.", "logic": "\nLunatic(else)\nnot Cystic(else)\nHitless(else)\nforall x (Hebridean(x) -> Hitless(x))\nLunatic(else) and Violative(else) -> Hebridean(else)\nforall x (Lunatic(x) -> Violative(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) and not Hitless(x) -> Ruthful(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) and not Acrogenic(x) -> Ruthful(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and Lunatic(x) -> not Ruthful(x))\n\nRuthful(else)\n\nLunatic(else) and forall x (Lunatic(x) -> Violative(x)) -> therefore Violative(else) Lunatic(else) and Violative(else) and Lunatic(else) and Violative(else) -> Hebridean(else) -> therefore Hebridean(else) Hebridean(else) and Lunatic(else) and forall x (Hebridean(x) and Lunatic(x) -> not Ruthful(x)) -> therefore not Ruthful(else)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-730"} {"premises": "Parnell is benefic. Parnell is unsheathed. Parnell is rabid. Parnell is veterinary. Parnell is multilane. Parnell is surmisable. Parnell is umpteen. Layne is benefic. Layne is unsheathed. Layne is rabid. Layne is veterinary. Layne is multilane. Layne is surmisable. Layne is umpteen. Young people are rabid. Round, rabid people are veterinary. Layne is multilane.", "logic": "\nBenefic(parnell)\nUnsheathed(parnell)\nRabid(parnell)\nVeterinary(parnell)\nMultilane(parnell)\nSurmisable(parnell)\nUmpteen(parnell)\nBenefic(layne)\nUnsheathed(layne)\nRabid(layne)\nVeterinary(layne)\nMultilane(layne)\nSurmisable(layne)\nUmpteen(layne)\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Rabid(x))\nforall x (Multilane(x) and Rabid(x) -> Veterinary(x))\n\nMultilane(layne)\n\ntherefore Multilane(layne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-129"} {"premises": "Welch is barbate. Welch is deafening. Welch is unmixable. Welch is ovarian. Welch is darling. Welch is flustered. Welch is prim. Gerrilee is barbate. Gerrilee is deafening. Gerrilee is unmixable. Gerrilee is ovarian. Gerrilee is darling. Gerrilee is flustered. Gerrilee is prim. Young people are unmixable. Round, unmixable people are ovarian. Gerrilee is not flustered.", "logic": "\nBarbate(welch)\nDeafening(welch)\nUnmixable(welch)\nOvarian(welch)\nDarling(welch)\nFlustered(welch)\nPrim(welch)\nBarbate(gerrilee)\nDeafening(gerrilee)\nUnmixable(gerrilee)\nOvarian(gerrilee)\nDarling(gerrilee)\nFlustered(gerrilee)\nPrim(gerrilee)\nforall x (Prim(x) -> Unmixable(x))\nforall x (Darling(x) and Unmixable(x) -> Ovarian(x))\n\nnot Flustered(gerrilee)\n\ntherefore Flustered(gerrilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-129"} {"premises": "Niall is wraithlike. Keil is puffy. Tish is compliant. Audie is compliant. If someone is sensitive then they are puffy. Smart people are sensitive. Audie is compliant.", "logic": "\nWraithlike(niall)\nPuffy(keil)\nCompliant(tish)\nCompliant(audie)\nforall x (Sensitive(x) -> Puffy(x))\nforall x (Compliant(x) -> Sensitive(x))\n\nCompliant(audie)\n\ntherefore Compliant(audie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Andi is ravaging. Amaleta is laureled. Tait is noisome. Micah is noisome. If someone is thumbed then they are laureled. Smart people are thumbed. Tait is not noisome.", "logic": "\nRavaging(andi)\nLaureled(amaleta)\nNoisome(tait)\nNoisome(micah)\nforall x (Thumbed(x) -> Laureled(x))\nforall x (Noisome(x) -> Thumbed(x))\n\nnot Noisome(tait)\n\ntherefore Noisome(tait)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Willard is insipid. Raynard is lxxxiv. Mikel is agile. Bradford is agile. If someone is unrecorded then they are lxxxiv. Smart people are unrecorded. Mikel is unrecorded.", "logic": "\nInsipid(willard)\nLxxxiv(raynard)\nAgile(mikel)\nAgile(bradford)\nforall x (Unrecorded(x) -> Lxxxiv(x))\nforall x (Agile(x) -> Unrecorded(x))\n\nUnrecorded(mikel)\n\nAgile(mikel) and forall x (Agile(x) -> Unrecorded(x)) -> therefore Unrecorded(mikel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Gates is voltaic. Edy is hindoo. Corabel is anomalous. Ethyl is anomalous. If someone is shiny then they are hindoo. Smart people are shiny. Corabel is not shiny.", "logic": "\nVoltaic(gates)\nHindoo(edy)\nAnomalous(corabel)\nAnomalous(ethyl)\nforall x (Shiny(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nforall x (Anomalous(x) -> Shiny(x))\n\nnot Shiny(corabel)\n\nAnomalous(corabel) and forall x (Anomalous(x) -> Shiny(x)) -> therefore Shiny(corabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Godart is noisome. Harris is phonologic. Florentia is fecal. Marlon is fecal. If someone is sexed then they are phonologic. Smart people are sexed. Marlon is phonologic.", "logic": "\nNoisome(godart)\nPhonologic(harris)\nFecal(florentia)\nFecal(marlon)\nforall x (Sexed(x) -> Phonologic(x))\nforall x (Fecal(x) -> Sexed(x))\n\nPhonologic(marlon)\n\nFecal(marlon) and forall x (Fecal(x) -> Sexed(x)) -> therefore Sexed(marlon) Sexed(marlon) and forall x (Sexed(x) -> Phonologic(x)) -> therefore Phonologic(marlon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Levy is unbigoted. Coralie is adept. Denice is malevolent. Mayda is malevolent. If someone is impellent then they are adept. Smart people are impellent. Mayda is not adept.", "logic": "\nUnbigoted(levy)\nAdept(coralie)\nMalevolent(denice)\nMalevolent(mayda)\nforall x (Impellent(x) -> Adept(x))\nforall x (Malevolent(x) -> Impellent(x))\n\nnot Adept(mayda)\n\nMalevolent(mayda) and forall x (Malevolent(x) -> Impellent(x)) -> therefore Impellent(mayda) Impellent(mayda) and forall x (Impellent(x) -> Adept(x)) -> therefore Adept(mayda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Kevan is untoasted. Merilee is barytic. Hester is podgy. Munroe is podgy. If someone is quintuple then they are barytic. Smart people are quintuple. Merilee is not quintuple.", "logic": "\nUntoasted(kevan)\nBarytic(merilee)\nPodgy(hester)\nPodgy(munroe)\nforall x (Quintuple(x) -> Barytic(x))\nforall x (Podgy(x) -> Quintuple(x))\n\nnot Quintuple(merilee)\n\nforall x (Podgy(x) -> Quintuple(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Pierre is stentorian. Katlin is unredeemed. Roderigo is vocational. Yetta is vocational. If someone is placative then they are unredeemed. Smart people are placative. Pierre is unredeemed.", "logic": "\nStentorian(pierre)\nUnredeemed(katlin)\nVocational(roderigo)\nVocational(yetta)\nforall x (Placative(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nforall x (Vocational(x) -> Placative(x))\n\nUnredeemed(pierre)\n\nforall x (Placative(x) -> Unredeemed(x)) <- forall x (Vocational(x) -> Placative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Jeremie is digressive. Ethel is dateable. Dael is luckless. Benni is luckless. If someone is campestral then they are dateable. Smart people are campestral. Jeremie is not campestral.", "logic": "\nDigressive(jeremie)\nDateable(ethel)\nLuckless(dael)\nLuckless(benni)\nforall x (Campestral(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Luckless(x) -> Campestral(x))\n\nnot Campestral(jeremie)\n\nforall x (Luckless(x) -> Campestral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Rozanna is cupulate. Nettie is slovenian. Winifred is tough. Mairead is tough. If someone is bridal then they are slovenian. Smart people are bridal. Rozanna is round.", "logic": "\nCupulate(rozanna)\nSlovenian(nettie)\nTough(winifred)\nTough(mairead)\nforall x (Bridal(x) -> Slovenian(x))\nforall x (Tough(x) -> Bridal(x))\n\nRound(rozanna)\n\nRound(rozanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Len is jain. Lorenza is outraged. Igor is umbilical. Juan is umbilical. If someone is titular then they are outraged. Smart people are titular. Igor is not jain.", "logic": "\nJain(len)\nOutraged(lorenza)\nUmbilical(igor)\nUmbilical(juan)\nforall x (Titular(x) -> Outraged(x))\nforall x (Umbilical(x) -> Titular(x))\n\nnot Jain(igor)\n\nnot Jain(igor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Violante is anosmic. Kacie is manlike. Pammy is callable. Astra is callable. If someone is senatorial then they are manlike. Smart people are senatorial. Pammy is white.", "logic": "\nAnosmic(violante)\nManlike(kacie)\nCallable(pammy)\nCallable(astra)\nforall x (Senatorial(x) -> Manlike(x))\nforall x (Callable(x) -> Senatorial(x))\n\nWhite(pammy)\n\nWhite(pammy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-984"} {"premises": "Felicle is numerous. Anneliese is teenaged. Anneliese is goosy. If someone is scapose then they are close. Nice people are scapose. Anneliese is teenaged.", "logic": "\nNumerous(felicle)\nTeenaged(anneliese)\nGoosy(anneliese)\nforall x (Scapose(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Teenaged(x) -> Scapose(x))\n\nTeenaged(anneliese)\n\ntherefore Teenaged(anneliese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Pearl is cool. Antonius is unmanful. Antonius is ticklish. If someone is lilting then they are lugubrious. Nice people are lilting. Antonius is not ticklish.", "logic": "\nCool(pearl)\nUnmanful(antonius)\nTicklish(antonius)\nforall x (Lilting(x) -> Lugubrious(x))\nforall x (Unmanful(x) -> Lilting(x))\n\nnot Ticklish(antonius)\n\ntherefore Ticklish(antonius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Aili is uncrowned. Toby is uncharted. Toby is postal. If someone is multiform then they are astatic. Nice people are multiform. Toby is multiform.", "logic": "\nUncrowned(aili)\nUncharted(toby)\nPostal(toby)\nforall x (Multiform(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Uncharted(x) -> Multiform(x))\n\nMultiform(toby)\n\nUncharted(toby) and forall x (Uncharted(x) -> Multiform(x)) -> therefore Multiform(toby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Shara is receptive. Hiralal is taxpaying. Hiralal is estimable. If someone is amused then they are estuarine. Nice people are amused. Hiralal is not amused.", "logic": "\nReceptive(shara)\nTaxpaying(hiralal)\nEstimable(hiralal)\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Estuarine(x))\nforall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Amused(x))\n\nnot Amused(hiralal)\n\nTaxpaying(hiralal) and forall x (Taxpaying(x) -> Amused(x)) -> therefore Amused(hiralal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Maure is martian. Madelaine is ropey. Madelaine is avenged. If someone is bipartite then they are highbrow. Nice people are bipartite. Madelaine is highbrow.", "logic": "\nMartian(maure)\nRopey(madelaine)\nAvenged(madelaine)\nforall x (Bipartite(x) -> Highbrow(x))\nforall x (Ropey(x) -> Bipartite(x))\n\nHighbrow(madelaine)\n\nRopey(madelaine) and forall x (Ropey(x) -> Bipartite(x)) -> therefore Bipartite(madelaine) Bipartite(madelaine) and forall x (Bipartite(x) -> Highbrow(x)) -> therefore Highbrow(madelaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Linn is inlaid. Genia is antinomian. Genia is unimpaired. If someone is maladroit then they are rheumy. Nice people are maladroit. Genia is not rheumy.", "logic": "\nInlaid(linn)\nAntinomian(genia)\nUnimpaired(genia)\nforall x (Maladroit(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Antinomian(x) -> Maladroit(x))\n\nnot Rheumy(genia)\n\nAntinomian(genia) and forall x (Antinomian(x) -> Maladroit(x)) -> therefore Maladroit(genia) Maladroit(genia) and forall x (Maladroit(x) -> Rheumy(x)) -> therefore Rheumy(genia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Tab is phrenic. Lissie is retained. Lissie is uncounted. If someone is wriggling then they are great. Nice people are wriggling. Tab is not wriggling.", "logic": "\nPhrenic(tab)\nRetained(lissie)\nUncounted(lissie)\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Great(x))\nforall x (Retained(x) -> Wriggling(x))\n\nnot Wriggling(tab)\n\nforall x (Retained(x) -> Wriggling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Robby is unstressed. Alphonso is ephesian. Alphonso is touristy. If someone is hoggish then they are familiar. Nice people are hoggish. Robby is familiar.", "logic": "\nUnstressed(robby)\nEphesian(alphonso)\nTouristy(alphonso)\nforall x (Hoggish(x) -> Familiar(x))\nforall x (Ephesian(x) -> Hoggish(x))\n\nFamiliar(robby)\n\nforall x (Hoggish(x) -> Familiar(x)) <- forall x (Ephesian(x) -> Hoggish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Carlye is phoney. Pru is pert. Pru is redux. If someone is osteal then they are odious. Nice people are osteal. Carlye is not redux.", "logic": "\nPhoney(carlye)\nPert(pru)\nRedux(pru)\nforall x (Osteal(x) -> Odious(x))\nforall x (Pert(x) -> Osteal(x))\n\nnot Redux(carlye)\n\nnot Redux(carlye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Issi is protrusive. Shawn is rheumatic. Shawn is ticklish. If someone is staple then they are vivid. Nice people are staple. Shawn is protrusive.", "logic": "\nProtrusive(issi)\nRheumatic(shawn)\nTicklish(shawn)\nforall x (Staple(x) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Rheumatic(x) -> Staple(x))\n\nProtrusive(shawn)\n\nProtrusive(shawn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Cordey is screaming. Lilith is aware. Lilith is dioecian. If someone is puffed then they are flush. Nice people are puffed. Lilith is not furry.", "logic": "\nScreaming(cordey)\nAware(lilith)\nDioecian(lilith)\nforall x (Puffed(x) -> Flush(x))\nforall x (Aware(x) -> Puffed(x))\n\nnot Furry(lilith)\n\nnot Furry(lilith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Debor is norse. Jimbo is inverted. Jimbo is magical. If someone is wormy then they are high. Nice people are wormy. Debor is furry.", "logic": "\nNorse(debor)\nInverted(jimbo)\nMagical(jimbo)\nforall x (Wormy(x) -> High(x))\nforall x (Inverted(x) -> Wormy(x))\n\nFurry(debor)\n\nFurry(debor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-45"} {"premises": "Louis is distressed. Louis is subdued. Louis is geniculate. All undraped people are distressed. If someone is fungicidal then they are xenogeneic. If someone is xenogeneic then they are fungicidal. If Louis is distressed and Louis is geniculate then Louis is xenogeneic. If someone is distressed and fungicidal then they are undraped. All wrecked, xenogeneic people are distressed. Louis is subdued.", "logic": "\nDistressed(louis)\nSubdued(louis)\nGeniculate(louis)\nforall x (Undraped(x) -> Distressed(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Xenogeneic(x))\nforall x (Xenogeneic(x) -> Fungicidal(x))\nDistressed(louis) and Geniculate(louis) -> Xenogeneic(louis)\nforall x (Distressed(x) and Fungicidal(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) and Xenogeneic(x) -> Distressed(x))\n\nSubdued(louis)\n\ntherefore Subdued(louis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Anita is radical. Anita is quadruple. Anita is crownless. All imperial people are radical. If someone is unripe then they are storied. If someone is storied then they are unripe. If Anita is radical and Anita is crownless then Anita is storied. If someone is radical and unripe then they are imperial. All plumbic, storied people are radical. Anita is not crownless.", "logic": "\nRadical(anita)\nQuadruple(anita)\nCrownless(anita)\nforall x (Imperial(x) -> Radical(x))\nforall x (Unripe(x) -> Storied(x))\nforall x (Storied(x) -> Unripe(x))\nRadical(anita) and Crownless(anita) -> Storied(anita)\nforall x (Radical(x) and Unripe(x) -> Imperial(x))\nforall x (Plumbic(x) and Storied(x) -> Radical(x))\n\nnot Crownless(anita)\n\ntherefore Crownless(anita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Englebert is loopy. Englebert is aloof. Englebert is structured. All aerial people are loopy. If someone is freudian then they are devilish. If someone is devilish then they are freudian. If Englebert is loopy and Englebert is structured then Englebert is devilish. If someone is loopy and freudian then they are aerial. All ridged, devilish people are loopy. Englebert is devilish.", "logic": "\nLoopy(englebert)\nAloof(englebert)\nStructured(englebert)\nforall x (Aerial(x) -> Loopy(x))\nforall x (Freudian(x) -> Devilish(x))\nforall x (Devilish(x) -> Freudian(x))\nLoopy(englebert) and Structured(englebert) -> Devilish(englebert)\nforall x (Loopy(x) and Freudian(x) -> Aerial(x))\nforall x (Ridged(x) and Devilish(x) -> Loopy(x))\n\nDevilish(englebert)\n\nLoopy(englebert) and Structured(englebert) and Loopy(englebert) and Structured(englebert) -> Devilish(englebert) -> therefore Devilish(englebert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Elga is indulgent. Elga is goalless. Elga is averse. All curst people are indulgent. If someone is hindermost then they are trimmed. If someone is trimmed then they are hindermost. If Elga is indulgent and Elga is averse then Elga is trimmed. If someone is indulgent and hindermost then they are curst. All xenogeneic, trimmed people are indulgent. Elga is not trimmed.", "logic": "\nIndulgent(elga)\nGoalless(elga)\nAverse(elga)\nforall x (Curst(x) -> Indulgent(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Trimmed(x))\nforall x (Trimmed(x) -> Hindermost(x))\nIndulgent(elga) and Averse(elga) -> Trimmed(elga)\nforall x (Indulgent(x) and Hindermost(x) -> Curst(x))\nforall x (Xenogeneic(x) and Trimmed(x) -> Indulgent(x))\n\nnot Trimmed(elga)\n\nIndulgent(elga) and Averse(elga) and Indulgent(elga) and Averse(elga) -> Trimmed(elga) -> therefore Trimmed(elga)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Aamir is hemophilic. Aamir is parametric. Aamir is benthal. All allied people are hemophilic. If someone is bullheaded then they are perplexing. If someone is perplexing then they are bullheaded. If Aamir is hemophilic and Aamir is benthal then Aamir is perplexing. If someone is hemophilic and bullheaded then they are allied. All carnation, perplexing people are hemophilic. Aamir is bullheaded.", "logic": "\nHemophilic(aamir)\nParametric(aamir)\nBenthal(aamir)\nforall x (Allied(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\nforall x (Bullheaded(x) -> Perplexing(x))\nforall x (Perplexing(x) -> Bullheaded(x))\nHemophilic(aamir) and Benthal(aamir) -> Perplexing(aamir)\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) and Bullheaded(x) -> Allied(x))\nforall x (Carnation(x) and Perplexing(x) -> Hemophilic(x))\n\nBullheaded(aamir)\n\nHemophilic(aamir) and Benthal(aamir) and Hemophilic(aamir) and Benthal(aamir) -> Perplexing(aamir) -> therefore Perplexing(aamir) Perplexing(aamir) and forall x (Perplexing(x) -> Bullheaded(x)) -> therefore Bullheaded(aamir)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Nico is dingy. Nico is multiplex. Nico is model. All rustling people are dingy. If someone is offensive then they are angelic. If someone is angelic then they are offensive. If Nico is dingy and Nico is model then Nico is angelic. If someone is dingy and offensive then they are rustling. All especial, angelic people are dingy. Nico is not offensive.", "logic": "\nDingy(nico)\nMultiplex(nico)\nModel(nico)\nforall x (Rustling(x) -> Dingy(x))\nforall x (Offensive(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Angelic(x) -> Offensive(x))\nDingy(nico) and Model(nico) -> Angelic(nico)\nforall x (Dingy(x) and Offensive(x) -> Rustling(x))\nforall x (Especial(x) and Angelic(x) -> Dingy(x))\n\nnot Offensive(nico)\n\nDingy(nico) and Model(nico) and Dingy(nico) and Model(nico) -> Angelic(nico) -> therefore Angelic(nico) Angelic(nico) and forall x (Angelic(x) -> Offensive(x)) -> therefore Offensive(nico)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Flora is efficient. Flora is soured. Flora is nightly. All tortuous people are efficient. If someone is barefaced then they are cloaked. If someone is cloaked then they are barefaced. If Flora is efficient and Flora is nightly then Flora is cloaked. If someone is efficient and barefaced then they are tortuous. All calumnious, cloaked people are efficient. Flora is tortuous.", "logic": "\nEfficient(flora)\nSoured(flora)\nNightly(flora)\nforall x (Tortuous(x) -> Efficient(x))\nforall x (Barefaced(x) -> Cloaked(x))\nforall x (Cloaked(x) -> Barefaced(x))\nEfficient(flora) and Nightly(flora) -> Cloaked(flora)\nforall x (Efficient(x) and Barefaced(x) -> Tortuous(x))\nforall x (Calumnious(x) and Cloaked(x) -> Efficient(x))\n\nTortuous(flora)\n\nEfficient(flora) and Nightly(flora) and Efficient(flora) and Nightly(flora) -> Cloaked(flora) -> therefore Cloaked(flora) Cloaked(flora) and forall x (Cloaked(x) -> Barefaced(x)) -> therefore Barefaced(flora) Efficient(flora) and Barefaced(flora) and forall x (Efficient(x) and Barefaced(x) -> Tortuous(x)) -> therefore Tortuous(flora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Marco is undutiful. Marco is enticing. Marco is indexical. All fetid people are undutiful. If someone is flexuous then they are feral. If someone is feral then they are flexuous. If Marco is undutiful and Marco is indexical then Marco is feral. If someone is undutiful and flexuous then they are fetid. All regent, feral people are undutiful. Marco is not fetid.", "logic": "\nUndutiful(marco)\nEnticing(marco)\nIndexical(marco)\nforall x (Fetid(x) -> Undutiful(x))\nforall x (Flexuous(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Feral(x) -> Flexuous(x))\nUndutiful(marco) and Indexical(marco) -> Feral(marco)\nforall x (Undutiful(x) and Flexuous(x) -> Fetid(x))\nforall x (Regent(x) and Feral(x) -> Undutiful(x))\n\nnot Fetid(marco)\n\nUndutiful(marco) and Indexical(marco) and Undutiful(marco) and Indexical(marco) -> Feral(marco) -> therefore Feral(marco) Feral(marco) and forall x (Feral(x) -> Flexuous(x)) -> therefore Flexuous(marco) Undutiful(marco) and Flexuous(marco) and forall x (Undutiful(x) and Flexuous(x) -> Fetid(x)) -> therefore Fetid(marco)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1873"} {"premises": "Boris is fossil. Salmon is civil. Urson is botched. Larina is fossil. All fossil things are amniotic. Salmon is civil.", "logic": "\nFossil(boris)\nCivil(salmon)\nBotched(urson)\nFossil(larina)\nforall x (Fossil(x) -> Amniotic(x))\n\nCivil(salmon)\n\ntherefore Civil(salmon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "Lemmy is latish. Davine is insincere. Rosabel is unaffected. Patrica is latish. All latish things are augustan. Davine is not insincere.", "logic": "\nLatish(lemmy)\nInsincere(davine)\nUnaffected(rosabel)\nLatish(patrica)\nforall x (Latish(x) -> Augustan(x))\n\nnot Insincere(davine)\n\ntherefore Insincere(davine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "Garth is humdrum. Lindy is hooklike. Goober is unpermed. Kate is humdrum. All humdrum things are climactic. Kate is climactic.", "logic": "\nHumdrum(garth)\nHooklike(lindy)\nUnpermed(goober)\nHumdrum(kate)\nforall x (Humdrum(x) -> Climactic(x))\n\nClimactic(kate)\n\nHumdrum(kate) and forall x (Humdrum(x) -> Climactic(x)) -> therefore Climactic(kate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "Josefina is here. Janot is lysogenic. Luna is amok. Valentina is here. All here things are squalling. Valentina is not squalling.", "logic": "\nHere(josefina)\nLysogenic(janot)\nAmok(luna)\nHere(valentina)\nforall x (Here(x) -> Squalling(x))\n\nnot Squalling(valentina)\n\nHere(valentina) and forall x (Here(x) -> Squalling(x)) -> therefore Squalling(valentina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "Teodora is valved. Stearne is unpressed. Maxine is written. Wheeler is valved. All valved things are islamic. Maxine is not islamic.", "logic": "\nValved(teodora)\nUnpressed(stearne)\nWritten(maxine)\nValved(wheeler)\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Islamic(x))\n\nnot Islamic(maxine)\n\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Islamic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "Beryle is fortemente. Sarita is bowing. Arline is confiscate. Witty is fortemente. All fortemente things are domestic. Sarita is domestic.", "logic": "\nFortemente(beryle)\nBowing(sarita)\nConfiscate(arline)\nFortemente(witty)\nforall x (Fortemente(x) -> Domestic(x))\n\nDomestic(sarita)\n\nforall x (Fortemente(x) -> Domestic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "Halimeda is baked. Tandie is motorised. Dulci is adonic. Whitman is baked. All baked things are altered. Dulci is not rough.", "logic": "\nBaked(halimeda)\nMotorised(tandie)\nAdonic(dulci)\nBaked(whitman)\nforall x (Baked(x) -> Altered(x))\n\nnot Rough(dulci)\n\nnot Rough(dulci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "Elsi is furious. Blanche is astral. Gabriella is excited. Lloyd is furious. All furious things are creaseless. Elsi is excited.", "logic": "\nFurious(elsi)\nAstral(blanche)\nExcited(gabriella)\nFurious(lloyd)\nforall x (Furious(x) -> Creaseless(x))\n\nExcited(elsi)\n\nExcited(elsi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3098"} {"premises": "The gilda is not clad. The alwin cosh the gilda. The alwin team the gilda. All felonious people are saxicolous. If the gilda is chiasmic then the gilda team the alwin. If someone cosh the gilda then the gilda team the alwin. If someone is chiasmic and saxicolous then they need the alwin. If the gilda team the alwin then the gilda necrose the alwin. If someone necrose the alwin then they need the gilda. If someone cosh the alwin and they are saxicolous then they see the gilda. If someone cosh the alwin and the alwin necrose the gilda then they are not clad. The gilda is not clad.", "logic": "\nnot Clad(gilda)\nCosh(alwin, gilda)\nTeam(alwin, gilda)\nforall x (Felonious(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nChiasmic(gilda) -> Team(gilda, alwin)\nforall x (Cosh(x, gilda) -> Team(gilda, alwin))\nforall x (Chiasmic(x) and Saxicolous(x) -> Necrose(x, alwin))\nTeam(gilda, alwin) -> Necrose(gilda, alwin)\nforall x (Necrose(x, alwin) -> Necrose(x, gilda))\nforall x (Cosh(x, alwin) and Saxicolous(x) -> Team(x, gilda))\nforall x (Cosh(x, alwin) and Necrose(alwin, gilda) -> not Clad(x))\n\nnot Clad(gilda)\n\ntherefore not Clad(gilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The dorris is not mistaken. The xaviera compliment the dorris. The xaviera occult the dorris. All sharp people are papistical. If the dorris is untilled then the dorris occult the xaviera. If someone compliment the dorris then the dorris occult the xaviera. If someone is untilled and papistical then they need the xaviera. If the dorris occult the xaviera then the dorris chap the xaviera. If someone chap the xaviera then they need the dorris. If someone compliment the xaviera and they are papistical then they see the dorris. If someone compliment the xaviera and the xaviera chap the dorris then they are not mistaken. The dorris is mistaken.", "logic": "\nnot Mistaken(dorris)\nCompliment(xaviera, dorris)\nOccult(xaviera, dorris)\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Papistical(x))\nUntilled(dorris) -> Occult(dorris, xaviera)\nforall x (Compliment(x, dorris) -> Occult(dorris, xaviera))\nforall x (Untilled(x) and Papistical(x) -> Chap(x, xaviera))\nOccult(dorris, xaviera) -> Chap(dorris, xaviera)\nforall x (Chap(x, xaviera) -> Chap(x, dorris))\nforall x (Compliment(x, xaviera) and Papistical(x) -> Occult(x, dorris))\nforall x (Compliment(x, xaviera) and Chap(xaviera, dorris) -> not Mistaken(x))\n\nMistaken(dorris)\n\ntherefore not Mistaken(dorris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The rasla is not populated. The ivie resell the rasla. The ivie demur the rasla. All supervised people are organized. If the rasla is bellbottom then the rasla demur the ivie. If someone resell the rasla then the rasla demur the ivie. If someone is bellbottom and organized then they need the ivie. If the rasla demur the ivie then the rasla lacquer the ivie. If someone lacquer the ivie then they need the rasla. If someone resell the ivie and they are organized then they see the rasla. If someone resell the ivie and the ivie lacquer the rasla then they are not populated. The rasla demur the ivie.", "logic": "\nnot Populated(rasla)\nResell(ivie, rasla)\nDemur(ivie, rasla)\nforall x (Supervised(x) -> Organized(x))\nBellbottom(rasla) -> Demur(rasla, ivie)\nforall x (Resell(x, rasla) -> Demur(rasla, ivie))\nforall x (Bellbottom(x) and Organized(x) -> Lacquer(x, ivie))\nDemur(rasla, ivie) -> Lacquer(rasla, ivie)\nforall x (Lacquer(x, ivie) -> Lacquer(x, rasla))\nforall x (Resell(x, ivie) and Organized(x) -> Demur(x, rasla))\nforall x (Resell(x, ivie) and Lacquer(ivie, rasla) -> not Populated(x))\n\nDemur(rasla, ivie)\n\nResell(ivie, rasla) and forall x (Resell(x, rasla) -> Demur(rasla, ivie)) -> therefore Demur(rasla, ivie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The mirna is not eightfold. The adey memorize the mirna. The adey teeter the mirna. All dripless people are grouped. If the mirna is unbaptised then the mirna teeter the adey. If someone memorize the mirna then the mirna teeter the adey. If someone is unbaptised and grouped then they need the adey. If the mirna teeter the adey then the mirna grovel the adey. If someone grovel the adey then they need the mirna. If someone memorize the adey and they are grouped then they see the mirna. If someone memorize the adey and the adey grovel the mirna then they are not eightfold. The mirna does not see the adey.", "logic": "\nnot Eightfold(mirna)\nMemorize(adey, mirna)\nTeeter(adey, mirna)\nforall x (Dripless(x) -> Grouped(x))\nUnbaptised(mirna) -> Teeter(mirna, adey)\nforall x (Memorize(x, mirna) -> Teeter(mirna, adey))\nforall x (Unbaptised(x) and Grouped(x) -> Grovel(x, adey))\nTeeter(mirna, adey) -> Grovel(mirna, adey)\nforall x (Grovel(x, adey) -> Grovel(x, mirna))\nforall x (Memorize(x, adey) and Grouped(x) -> Teeter(x, mirna))\nforall x (Memorize(x, adey) and Grovel(adey, mirna) -> not Eightfold(x))\n\nnot Teeter(mirna, adey)\n\nMemorize(adey, mirna) and forall x (Memorize(x, mirna) -> Teeter(mirna, adey)) -> therefore Teeter(mirna, adey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The magdaia is not foliate. The bjorn revolt the magdaia. The bjorn ingraft the magdaia. All brasslike people are uncreative. If the magdaia is sacculated then the magdaia ingraft the bjorn. If someone revolt the magdaia then the magdaia ingraft the bjorn. If someone is sacculated and uncreative then they need the bjorn. If the magdaia ingraft the bjorn then the magdaia homogenise the bjorn. If someone homogenise the bjorn then they need the magdaia. If someone revolt the bjorn and they are uncreative then they see the magdaia. If someone revolt the bjorn and the bjorn homogenise the magdaia then they are not foliate. The magdaia homogenise the bjorn.", "logic": "\nnot Foliate(magdaia)\nRevolt(bjorn, magdaia)\nIngraft(bjorn, magdaia)\nforall x (Brasslike(x) -> Uncreative(x))\nSacculated(magdaia) -> Ingraft(magdaia, bjorn)\nforall x (Revolt(x, magdaia) -> Ingraft(magdaia, bjorn))\nforall x (Sacculated(x) and Uncreative(x) -> Homogenise(x, bjorn))\nIngraft(magdaia, bjorn) -> Homogenise(magdaia, bjorn)\nforall x (Homogenise(x, bjorn) -> Homogenise(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Revolt(x, bjorn) and Uncreative(x) -> Ingraft(x, magdaia))\nforall x (Revolt(x, bjorn) and Homogenise(bjorn, magdaia) -> not Foliate(x))\n\nHomogenise(magdaia, bjorn)\n\nRevolt(bjorn, magdaia) and forall x (Revolt(x, magdaia) -> Ingraft(magdaia, bjorn)) -> therefore Ingraft(magdaia, bjorn) Ingraft(magdaia, bjorn) and Ingraft(magdaia, bjorn) -> Homogenise(magdaia, bjorn) -> therefore Homogenise(magdaia, bjorn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The garrett is not tapered. The lucky elicit the garrett. The lucky earmark the garrett. All combative people are expositive. If the garrett is recurring then the garrett earmark the lucky. If someone elicit the garrett then the garrett earmark the lucky. If someone is recurring and expositive then they need the lucky. If the garrett earmark the lucky then the garrett flub the lucky. If someone flub the lucky then they need the garrett. If someone elicit the lucky and they are expositive then they see the garrett. If someone elicit the lucky and the lucky flub the garrett then they are not tapered. The garrett does not need the lucky.", "logic": "\nnot Tapered(garrett)\nElicit(lucky, garrett)\nEarmark(lucky, garrett)\nforall x (Combative(x) -> Expositive(x))\nRecurring(garrett) -> Earmark(garrett, lucky)\nforall x (Elicit(x, garrett) -> Earmark(garrett, lucky))\nforall x (Recurring(x) and Expositive(x) -> Flub(x, lucky))\nEarmark(garrett, lucky) -> Flub(garrett, lucky)\nforall x (Flub(x, lucky) -> Flub(x, garrett))\nforall x (Elicit(x, lucky) and Expositive(x) -> Earmark(x, garrett))\nforall x (Elicit(x, lucky) and Flub(lucky, garrett) -> not Tapered(x))\n\nnot Flub(garrett, lucky)\n\nElicit(lucky, garrett) and forall x (Elicit(x, garrett) -> Earmark(garrett, lucky)) -> therefore Earmark(garrett, lucky) Earmark(garrett, lucky) and Earmark(garrett, lucky) -> Flub(garrett, lucky) -> therefore Flub(garrett, lucky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The garrot is not robustious. The lindsey impel the garrot. The lindsey rabbet the garrot. All laudatory people are recurvate. If the garrot is acoustical then the garrot rabbet the lindsey. If someone impel the garrot then the garrot rabbet the lindsey. If someone is acoustical and recurvate then they need the lindsey. If the garrot rabbet the lindsey then the garrot husband the lindsey. If someone husband the lindsey then they need the garrot. If someone impel the lindsey and they are recurvate then they see the garrot. If someone impel the lindsey and the lindsey husband the garrot then they are not robustious. The garrot husband the garrot.", "logic": "\nnot Robustious(garrot)\nImpel(lindsey, garrot)\nRabbet(lindsey, garrot)\nforall x (Laudatory(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nAcoustical(garrot) -> Rabbet(garrot, lindsey)\nforall x (Impel(x, garrot) -> Rabbet(garrot, lindsey))\nforall x (Acoustical(x) and Recurvate(x) -> Husband(x, lindsey))\nRabbet(garrot, lindsey) -> Husband(garrot, lindsey)\nforall x (Husband(x, lindsey) -> Husband(x, garrot))\nforall x (Impel(x, lindsey) and Recurvate(x) -> Rabbet(x, garrot))\nforall x (Impel(x, lindsey) and Husband(lindsey, garrot) -> not Robustious(x))\n\nHusband(garrot, garrot)\n\nImpel(lindsey, garrot) and forall x (Impel(x, garrot) -> Rabbet(garrot, lindsey)) -> therefore Rabbet(garrot, lindsey) Rabbet(garrot, lindsey) and Rabbet(garrot, lindsey) -> Husband(garrot, lindsey) -> therefore Husband(garrot, lindsey) Husband(garrot, lindsey) and forall x (Husband(x, lindsey) -> Husband(x, garrot)) -> therefore Husband(garrot, garrot)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The kaila is not golden. The vito unloosen the kaila. The vito convoke the kaila. All untempting people are ingrowing. If the kaila is fazed then the kaila convoke the vito. If someone unloosen the kaila then the kaila convoke the vito. If someone is fazed and ingrowing then they need the vito. If the kaila convoke the vito then the kaila slot the vito. If someone slot the vito then they need the kaila. If someone unloosen the vito and they are ingrowing then they see the kaila. If someone unloosen the vito and the vito slot the kaila then they are not golden. The kaila does not need the kaila.", "logic": "\nnot Golden(kaila)\nUnloosen(vito, kaila)\nConvoke(vito, kaila)\nforall x (Untempting(x) -> Ingrowing(x))\nFazed(kaila) -> Convoke(kaila, vito)\nforall x (Unloosen(x, kaila) -> Convoke(kaila, vito))\nforall x (Fazed(x) and Ingrowing(x) -> Slot(x, vito))\nConvoke(kaila, vito) -> Slot(kaila, vito)\nforall x (Slot(x, vito) -> Slot(x, kaila))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, vito) and Ingrowing(x) -> Convoke(x, kaila))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, vito) and Slot(vito, kaila) -> not Golden(x))\n\nnot Slot(kaila, kaila)\n\nUnloosen(vito, kaila) and forall x (Unloosen(x, kaila) -> Convoke(kaila, vito)) -> therefore Convoke(kaila, vito) Convoke(kaila, vito) and Convoke(kaila, vito) -> Slot(kaila, vito) -> therefore Slot(kaila, vito) Slot(kaila, vito) and forall x (Slot(x, vito) -> Slot(x, kaila)) -> therefore Slot(kaila, kaila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The evonne is not ankylotic. The mikhail consummate the evonne. The mikhail attest the evonne. All indulgent people are automatic. If the evonne is enlivened then the evonne attest the mikhail. If someone consummate the evonne then the evonne attest the mikhail. If someone is enlivened and automatic then they need the mikhail. If the evonne attest the mikhail then the evonne rear the mikhail. If someone rear the mikhail then they need the evonne. If someone consummate the mikhail and they are automatic then they see the evonne. If someone consummate the mikhail and the mikhail rear the evonne then they are not ankylotic. The mikhail does not need the evonne.", "logic": "\nnot Ankylotic(evonne)\nConsummate(mikhail, evonne)\nAttest(mikhail, evonne)\nforall x (Indulgent(x) -> Automatic(x))\nEnlivened(evonne) -> Attest(evonne, mikhail)\nforall x (Consummate(x, evonne) -> Attest(evonne, mikhail))\nforall x (Enlivened(x) and Automatic(x) -> Rear(x, mikhail))\nAttest(evonne, mikhail) -> Rear(evonne, mikhail)\nforall x (Rear(x, mikhail) -> Rear(x, evonne))\nforall x (Consummate(x, mikhail) and Automatic(x) -> Attest(x, evonne))\nforall x (Consummate(x, mikhail) and Rear(mikhail, evonne) -> not Ankylotic(x))\n\nnot Rear(mikhail, evonne)\n\nforall x (Rear(x, mikhail) -> Rear(x, evonne)) <- forall x (Enlivened(x) and Automatic(x) -> Rear(x, mikhail)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The melantha is not encased. The merl resublime the melantha. The merl cope the melantha. All eyeless people are unmerciful. If the melantha is polish then the melantha cope the merl. If someone resublime the melantha then the melantha cope the merl. If someone is polish and unmerciful then they need the merl. If the melantha cope the merl then the melantha trench the merl. If someone trench the merl then they need the melantha. If someone resublime the merl and they are unmerciful then they see the melantha. If someone resublime the merl and the merl trench the melantha then they are not encased. The merl trench the merl.", "logic": "\nnot Encased(melantha)\nResublime(merl, melantha)\nCope(merl, melantha)\nforall x (Eyeless(x) -> Unmerciful(x))\nPolish(melantha) -> Cope(melantha, merl)\nforall x (Resublime(x, melantha) -> Cope(melantha, merl))\nforall x (Polish(x) and Unmerciful(x) -> Trench(x, merl))\nCope(melantha, merl) -> Trench(melantha, merl)\nforall x (Trench(x, merl) -> Trench(x, melantha))\nforall x (Resublime(x, merl) and Unmerciful(x) -> Cope(x, melantha))\nforall x (Resublime(x, merl) and Trench(merl, melantha) -> not Encased(x))\n\nTrench(merl, merl)\n\nforall x (Polish(x) and Unmerciful(x) -> Trench(x, merl)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The bev is not citrous. The ulrike blackleg the bev. The ulrike fall the bev. All bodacious people are amniotic. If the bev is gargantuan then the bev fall the ulrike. If someone blackleg the bev then the bev fall the ulrike. If someone is gargantuan and amniotic then they need the ulrike. If the bev fall the ulrike then the bev detoxify the ulrike. If someone detoxify the ulrike then they need the bev. If someone blackleg the ulrike and they are amniotic then they see the bev. If someone blackleg the ulrike and the ulrike detoxify the bev then they are not citrous. The ulrike is not amniotic.", "logic": "\nnot Citrous(bev)\nBlackleg(ulrike, bev)\nFall(ulrike, bev)\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Amniotic(x))\nGargantuan(bev) -> Fall(bev, ulrike)\nforall x (Blackleg(x, bev) -> Fall(bev, ulrike))\nforall x (Gargantuan(x) and Amniotic(x) -> Detoxify(x, ulrike))\nFall(bev, ulrike) -> Detoxify(bev, ulrike)\nforall x (Detoxify(x, ulrike) -> Detoxify(x, bev))\nforall x (Blackleg(x, ulrike) and Amniotic(x) -> Fall(x, bev))\nforall x (Blackleg(x, ulrike) and Detoxify(ulrike, bev) -> not Citrous(x))\n\nnot Amniotic(ulrike)\n\nforall x (Bodacious(x) -> Amniotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The louella is not unloaded. The veriee twitter the louella. The veriee grizzle the louella. All orbitual people are dynamic. If the louella is leafless then the louella grizzle the veriee. If someone twitter the louella then the louella grizzle the veriee. If someone is leafless and dynamic then they need the veriee. If the louella grizzle the veriee then the louella request the veriee. If someone request the veriee then they need the louella. If someone twitter the veriee and they are dynamic then they see the louella. If someone twitter the veriee and the veriee request the louella then they are not unloaded. The louella is dynamic.", "logic": "\nnot Unloaded(louella)\nTwitter(veriee, louella)\nGrizzle(veriee, louella)\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Dynamic(x))\nLeafless(louella) -> Grizzle(louella, veriee)\nforall x (Twitter(x, louella) -> Grizzle(louella, veriee))\nforall x (Leafless(x) and Dynamic(x) -> Request(x, veriee))\nGrizzle(louella, veriee) -> Request(louella, veriee)\nforall x (Request(x, veriee) -> Request(x, louella))\nforall x (Twitter(x, veriee) and Dynamic(x) -> Grizzle(x, louella))\nforall x (Twitter(x, veriee) and Request(veriee, louella) -> not Unloaded(x))\n\nDynamic(louella)\n\nforall x (Orbitual(x) -> Dynamic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The arlene is not fragmental. The shelby dismiss the arlene. The shelby visit the arlene. All washed people are enolic. If the arlene is silky then the arlene visit the shelby. If someone dismiss the arlene then the arlene visit the shelby. If someone is silky and enolic then they need the shelby. If the arlene visit the shelby then the arlene odourise the shelby. If someone odourise the shelby then they need the arlene. If someone dismiss the shelby and they are enolic then they see the arlene. If someone dismiss the shelby and the shelby odourise the arlene then they are not fragmental. The shelby is not washed.", "logic": "\nnot Fragmental(arlene)\nDismiss(shelby, arlene)\nVisit(shelby, arlene)\nforall x (Washed(x) -> Enolic(x))\nSilky(arlene) -> Visit(arlene, shelby)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, arlene) -> Visit(arlene, shelby))\nforall x (Silky(x) and Enolic(x) -> Odourise(x, shelby))\nVisit(arlene, shelby) -> Odourise(arlene, shelby)\nforall x (Odourise(x, shelby) -> Odourise(x, arlene))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, shelby) and Enolic(x) -> Visit(x, arlene))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, shelby) and Odourise(shelby, arlene) -> not Fragmental(x))\n\nnot Washed(shelby)\n\nnot Washed(shelby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The keefe is not punitive. The pia grip the keefe. The pia exchange the keefe. All frightened people are lobate. If the keefe is calculated then the keefe exchange the pia. If someone grip the keefe then the keefe exchange the pia. If someone is calculated and lobate then they need the pia. If the keefe exchange the pia then the keefe pigment the pia. If someone pigment the pia then they need the keefe. If someone grip the pia and they are lobate then they see the keefe. If someone grip the pia and the pia pigment the keefe then they are not punitive. The pia exchange the pia.", "logic": "\nnot Punitive(keefe)\nGrip(pia, keefe)\nExchange(pia, keefe)\nforall x (Frightened(x) -> Lobate(x))\nCalculated(keefe) -> Exchange(keefe, pia)\nforall x (Grip(x, keefe) -> Exchange(keefe, pia))\nforall x (Calculated(x) and Lobate(x) -> Pigment(x, pia))\nExchange(keefe, pia) -> Pigment(keefe, pia)\nforall x (Pigment(x, pia) -> Pigment(x, keefe))\nforall x (Grip(x, pia) and Lobate(x) -> Exchange(x, keefe))\nforall x (Grip(x, pia) and Pigment(pia, keefe) -> not Punitive(x))\n\nExchange(pia, pia)\n\nExchange(pia, pia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The shay is not cobwebby. The evangelin expand the shay. The evangelin misspend the shay. All atomic people are stringent. If the shay is campy then the shay misspend the evangelin. If someone expand the shay then the shay misspend the evangelin. If someone is campy and stringent then they need the evangelin. If the shay misspend the evangelin then the shay retouch the evangelin. If someone retouch the evangelin then they need the shay. If someone expand the evangelin and they are stringent then they see the shay. If someone expand the evangelin and the evangelin retouch the shay then they are not cobwebby. The evangelin is not campy.", "logic": "\nnot Cobwebby(shay)\nExpand(evangelin, shay)\nMisspend(evangelin, shay)\nforall x (Atomic(x) -> Stringent(x))\nCampy(shay) -> Misspend(shay, evangelin)\nforall x (Expand(x, shay) -> Misspend(shay, evangelin))\nforall x (Campy(x) and Stringent(x) -> Retouch(x, evangelin))\nMisspend(shay, evangelin) -> Retouch(shay, evangelin)\nforall x (Retouch(x, evangelin) -> Retouch(x, shay))\nforall x (Expand(x, evangelin) and Stringent(x) -> Misspend(x, shay))\nforall x (Expand(x, evangelin) and Retouch(evangelin, shay) -> not Cobwebby(x))\n\nnot Campy(evangelin)\n\nnot Campy(evangelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "The gayle is not advisable. The sondra desex the gayle. The sondra beef the gayle. All seeming people are cross. If the gayle is premedical then the gayle beef the sondra. If someone desex the gayle then the gayle beef the sondra. If someone is premedical and cross then they need the sondra. If the gayle beef the sondra then the gayle glow the sondra. If someone glow the sondra then they need the gayle. If someone desex the sondra and they are cross then they see the gayle. If someone desex the sondra and the sondra glow the gayle then they are not advisable. The sondra is advisable.", "logic": "\nnot Advisable(gayle)\nDesex(sondra, gayle)\nBeef(sondra, gayle)\nforall x (Seeming(x) -> Cross(x))\nPremedical(gayle) -> Beef(gayle, sondra)\nforall x (Desex(x, gayle) -> Beef(gayle, sondra))\nforall x (Premedical(x) and Cross(x) -> Glow(x, sondra))\nBeef(gayle, sondra) -> Glow(gayle, sondra)\nforall x (Glow(x, sondra) -> Glow(x, gayle))\nforall x (Desex(x, sondra) and Cross(x) -> Beef(x, gayle))\nforall x (Desex(x, sondra) and Glow(sondra, gayle) -> not Advisable(x))\n\nAdvisable(sondra)\n\nAdvisable(sondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1247"} {"premises": "Riley is petrifying. Queada is seraphic. Queada is parametric. Pearline is petrifying. Merridie is reasoned. Merridie is blotched. Merridie is parametric. White people are petrifying. Merridie is reasoned.", "logic": "\nPetrifying(riley)\nSeraphic(queada)\nParametric(queada)\nPetrifying(pearline)\nReasoned(merridie)\nBlotched(merridie)\nParametric(merridie)\nforall x (Parametric(x) -> Petrifying(x))\n\nReasoned(merridie)\n\ntherefore Reasoned(merridie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-135"} {"premises": "Morganne is bushy. Annalyse is packaged. Annalyse is iodised. Thad is bushy. Jeralee is motorial. Jeralee is cyclonical. Jeralee is iodised. White people are bushy. Jeralee is not motorial.", "logic": "\nBushy(morganne)\nPackaged(annalyse)\nIodised(annalyse)\nBushy(thad)\nMotorial(jeralee)\nCyclonical(jeralee)\nIodised(jeralee)\nforall x (Iodised(x) -> Bushy(x))\n\nnot Motorial(jeralee)\n\ntherefore Motorial(jeralee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-135"} {"premises": "Mia is victorian. Nerta is unproved. Nerta is dustlike. Sella is victorian. Grazia is sinewy. Grazia is square. Grazia is dustlike. White people are victorian. Sella is not dustlike.", "logic": "\nVictorian(mia)\nUnproved(nerta)\nDustlike(nerta)\nVictorian(sella)\nSinewy(grazia)\nSquare(grazia)\nDustlike(grazia)\nforall x (Dustlike(x) -> Victorian(x))\n\nnot Dustlike(sella)\n\nnot Dustlike(sella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-135"} {"premises": "Jeralee is annelidan. Lawton is diminutive. Lawton is trivial. Kelwin is annelidan. Blakeley is sleeveless. Blakeley is chondritic. Blakeley is trivial. White people are annelidan. Kelwin is kind.", "logic": "\nAnnelidan(jeralee)\nDiminutive(lawton)\nTrivial(lawton)\nAnnelidan(kelwin)\nSleeveless(blakeley)\nChondritic(blakeley)\nTrivial(blakeley)\nforall x (Trivial(x) -> Annelidan(x))\n\nKind(kelwin)\n\nKind(kelwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-135"} {"premises": "The teddy is bromidic. The teddy foreclose the taddeo. The taddeo does not visit the teddy. If something foreclose the taddeo then the taddeo foreclose the teddy. If something foreclose the teddy and it foreclose the taddeo then the taddeo refashion the teddy. If the taddeo is uncrannied then the taddeo is finite. If something dandle the teddy then the teddy foreclose the taddeo. If something is uncrannied then it dandle the teddy. If something foreclose the teddy then it is uncrannied. If something foreclose the teddy then it is uncrannied. If the teddy foreclose the taddeo then the teddy does not visit the taddeo. The teddy is bromidic.", "logic": "\nBromidic(teddy)\nForeclose(teddy, taddeo)\nnot Refashion(taddeo, teddy)\nforall x (Foreclose(x, taddeo) -> Foreclose(taddeo, teddy))\nforall x (Foreclose(x, teddy) and Foreclose(x, taddeo) -> Refashion(taddeo, teddy))\nUncrannied(taddeo) -> Finite(taddeo)\nforall x (Dandle(x, teddy) -> Foreclose(teddy, taddeo))\nforall x (Uncrannied(x) -> Dandle(x, teddy))\nforall x (Foreclose(x, teddy) -> Uncrannied(x))\nforall x (Foreclose(x, teddy) -> Uncrannied(x))\nForeclose(teddy, taddeo) -> not Refashion(teddy, taddeo)\n\nBromidic(teddy)\n\ntherefore Bromidic(teddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The ambrose is voltarian. The ambrose pull the carmon. The carmon does not visit the ambrose. If something pull the carmon then the carmon pull the ambrose. If something pull the ambrose and it pull the carmon then the carmon extrude the ambrose. If the carmon is capetian then the carmon is limacoid. If something smooth the ambrose then the ambrose pull the carmon. If something is capetian then it smooth the ambrose. If something pull the ambrose then it is capetian. If something pull the ambrose then it is capetian. If the ambrose pull the carmon then the ambrose does not visit the carmon. The ambrose is not voltarian.", "logic": "\nVoltarian(ambrose)\nPull(ambrose, carmon)\nnot Extrude(carmon, ambrose)\nforall x (Pull(x, carmon) -> Pull(carmon, ambrose))\nforall x (Pull(x, ambrose) and Pull(x, carmon) -> Extrude(carmon, ambrose))\nCapetian(carmon) -> Limacoid(carmon)\nforall x (Smooth(x, ambrose) -> Pull(ambrose, carmon))\nforall x (Capetian(x) -> Smooth(x, ambrose))\nforall x (Pull(x, ambrose) -> Capetian(x))\nforall x (Pull(x, ambrose) -> Capetian(x))\nPull(ambrose, carmon) -> not Extrude(ambrose, carmon)\n\nnot Voltarian(ambrose)\n\ntherefore Voltarian(ambrose)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The staffard is partial. The staffard housekeep the karine. The karine does not visit the staffard. If something housekeep the karine then the karine housekeep the staffard. If something housekeep the staffard and it housekeep the karine then the karine proofread the staffard. If the karine is jammed then the karine is daring. If something effuse the staffard then the staffard housekeep the karine. If something is jammed then it effuse the staffard. If something housekeep the staffard then it is jammed. If something housekeep the staffard then it is jammed. If the staffard housekeep the karine then the staffard does not visit the karine. The karine housekeep the staffard.", "logic": "\nPartial(staffard)\nHousekeep(staffard, karine)\nnot Proofread(karine, staffard)\nforall x (Housekeep(x, karine) -> Housekeep(karine, staffard))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, staffard) and Housekeep(x, karine) -> Proofread(karine, staffard))\nJammed(karine) -> Daring(karine)\nforall x (Effuse(x, staffard) -> Housekeep(staffard, karine))\nforall x (Jammed(x) -> Effuse(x, staffard))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, staffard) -> Jammed(x))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, staffard) -> Jammed(x))\nHousekeep(staffard, karine) -> not Proofread(staffard, karine)\n\nHousekeep(karine, staffard)\n\nHousekeep(staffard, karine) and forall x (Housekeep(x, karine) -> Housekeep(karine, staffard)) -> therefore Housekeep(karine, staffard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The standford is chaotic. The standford overwrite the emile. The emile does not visit the standford. If something overwrite the emile then the emile overwrite the standford. If something overwrite the standford and it overwrite the emile then the emile botch the standford. If the emile is camp then the emile is engrossed. If something clinker the standford then the standford overwrite the emile. If something is camp then it clinker the standford. If something overwrite the standford then it is camp. If something overwrite the standford then it is camp. If the standford overwrite the emile then the standford does not visit the emile. The standford botch the emile.", "logic": "\nChaotic(standford)\nOverwrite(standford, emile)\nnot Botch(emile, standford)\nforall x (Overwrite(x, emile) -> Overwrite(emile, standford))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, standford) and Overwrite(x, emile) -> Botch(emile, standford))\nCamp(emile) -> Engrossed(emile)\nforall x (Clinker(x, standford) -> Overwrite(standford, emile))\nforall x (Camp(x) -> Clinker(x, standford))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, standford) -> Camp(x))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, standford) -> Camp(x))\nOverwrite(standford, emile) -> not Botch(standford, emile)\n\nBotch(standford, emile)\n\nOverwrite(standford, emile) and Overwrite(standford, emile) -> not Botch(standford, emile) -> therefore not Botch(standford, emile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The fidela is phyllodial. The fidela sleigh the ethelbert. The ethelbert does not visit the fidela. If something sleigh the ethelbert then the ethelbert sleigh the fidela. If something sleigh the fidela and it sleigh the ethelbert then the ethelbert roost the fidela. If the ethelbert is smallish then the ethelbert is nonfatal. If something enfold the fidela then the fidela sleigh the ethelbert. If something is smallish then it enfold the fidela. If something sleigh the fidela then it is smallish. If something sleigh the fidela then it is smallish. If the fidela sleigh the ethelbert then the fidela does not visit the ethelbert. The ethelbert is smallish.", "logic": "\nPhyllodial(fidela)\nSleigh(fidela, ethelbert)\nnot Roost(ethelbert, fidela)\nforall x (Sleigh(x, ethelbert) -> Sleigh(ethelbert, fidela))\nforall x (Sleigh(x, fidela) and Sleigh(x, ethelbert) -> Roost(ethelbert, fidela))\nSmallish(ethelbert) -> Nonfatal(ethelbert)\nforall x (Enfold(x, fidela) -> Sleigh(fidela, ethelbert))\nforall x (Smallish(x) -> Enfold(x, fidela))\nforall x (Sleigh(x, fidela) -> Smallish(x))\nforall x (Sleigh(x, fidela) -> Smallish(x))\nSleigh(fidela, ethelbert) -> not Roost(fidela, ethelbert)\n\nSmallish(ethelbert)\n\nSleigh(fidela, ethelbert) and forall x (Sleigh(x, ethelbert) -> Sleigh(ethelbert, fidela)) -> therefore Sleigh(ethelbert, fidela) Sleigh(ethelbert, fidela) and forall x (Sleigh(x, fidela) -> Smallish(x)) -> therefore Smallish(ethelbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The dionysus is uncombable. The dionysus queue the gillan. The gillan does not visit the dionysus. If something queue the gillan then the gillan queue the dionysus. If something queue the dionysus and it queue the gillan then the gillan greet the dionysus. If the gillan is quixotic then the gillan is stuporous. If something auction the dionysus then the dionysus queue the gillan. If something is quixotic then it auction the dionysus. If something queue the dionysus then it is quixotic. If something queue the dionysus then it is quixotic. If the dionysus queue the gillan then the dionysus does not visit the gillan. The gillan is not quixotic.", "logic": "\nUncombable(dionysus)\nQueue(dionysus, gillan)\nnot Greet(gillan, dionysus)\nforall x (Queue(x, gillan) -> Queue(gillan, dionysus))\nforall x (Queue(x, dionysus) and Queue(x, gillan) -> Greet(gillan, dionysus))\nQuixotic(gillan) -> Stuporous(gillan)\nforall x (Auction(x, dionysus) -> Queue(dionysus, gillan))\nforall x (Quixotic(x) -> Auction(x, dionysus))\nforall x (Queue(x, dionysus) -> Quixotic(x))\nforall x (Queue(x, dionysus) -> Quixotic(x))\nQueue(dionysus, gillan) -> not Greet(dionysus, gillan)\n\nnot Quixotic(gillan)\n\nQueue(dionysus, gillan) and forall x (Queue(x, gillan) -> Queue(gillan, dionysus)) -> therefore Queue(gillan, dionysus) Queue(gillan, dionysus) and forall x (Queue(x, dionysus) -> Quixotic(x)) -> therefore Quixotic(gillan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The inna is upper. The inna profit the matthiew. The matthiew does not visit the inna. If something profit the matthiew then the matthiew profit the inna. If something profit the inna and it profit the matthiew then the matthiew hive the inna. If the matthiew is distaff then the matthiew is analyzable. If something elide the inna then the inna profit the matthiew. If something is distaff then it elide the inna. If something profit the inna then it is distaff. If something profit the inna then it is distaff. If the inna profit the matthiew then the inna does not visit the matthiew. The matthiew is analyzable.", "logic": "\nUpper(inna)\nProfit(inna, matthiew)\nnot Hive(matthiew, inna)\nforall x (Profit(x, matthiew) -> Profit(matthiew, inna))\nforall x (Profit(x, inna) and Profit(x, matthiew) -> Hive(matthiew, inna))\nDistaff(matthiew) -> Analyzable(matthiew)\nforall x (Elide(x, inna) -> Profit(inna, matthiew))\nforall x (Distaff(x) -> Elide(x, inna))\nforall x (Profit(x, inna) -> Distaff(x))\nforall x (Profit(x, inna) -> Distaff(x))\nProfit(inna, matthiew) -> not Hive(inna, matthiew)\n\nAnalyzable(matthiew)\n\nProfit(inna, matthiew) and forall x (Profit(x, matthiew) -> Profit(matthiew, inna)) -> therefore Profit(matthiew, inna) Profit(matthiew, inna) and forall x (Profit(x, inna) -> Distaff(x)) -> therefore Distaff(matthiew) Distaff(matthiew) and Distaff(matthiew) -> Analyzable(matthiew) -> therefore Analyzable(matthiew)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The prasun is blushful. The prasun thurify the mohamed. The mohamed does not visit the prasun. If something thurify the mohamed then the mohamed thurify the prasun. If something thurify the prasun and it thurify the mohamed then the mohamed crimson the prasun. If the mohamed is capitalist then the mohamed is formalized. If something permute the prasun then the prasun thurify the mohamed. If something is capitalist then it permute the prasun. If something thurify the prasun then it is capitalist. If something thurify the prasun then it is capitalist. If the prasun thurify the mohamed then the prasun does not visit the mohamed. The mohamed is not formalized.", "logic": "\nBlushful(prasun)\nThurify(prasun, mohamed)\nnot Crimson(mohamed, prasun)\nforall x (Thurify(x, mohamed) -> Thurify(mohamed, prasun))\nforall x (Thurify(x, prasun) and Thurify(x, mohamed) -> Crimson(mohamed, prasun))\nCapitalist(mohamed) -> Formalized(mohamed)\nforall x (Permute(x, prasun) -> Thurify(prasun, mohamed))\nforall x (Capitalist(x) -> Permute(x, prasun))\nforall x (Thurify(x, prasun) -> Capitalist(x))\nforall x (Thurify(x, prasun) -> Capitalist(x))\nThurify(prasun, mohamed) -> not Crimson(prasun, mohamed)\n\nnot Formalized(mohamed)\n\nThurify(prasun, mohamed) and forall x (Thurify(x, mohamed) -> Thurify(mohamed, prasun)) -> therefore Thurify(mohamed, prasun) Thurify(mohamed, prasun) and forall x (Thurify(x, prasun) -> Capitalist(x)) -> therefore Capitalist(mohamed) Capitalist(mohamed) and Capitalist(mohamed) -> Formalized(mohamed) -> therefore Formalized(mohamed)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The athena is squabby. The athena outpoint the albrecht. The albrecht does not visit the athena. If something outpoint the albrecht then the albrecht outpoint the athena. If something outpoint the athena and it outpoint the albrecht then the albrecht rhumba the athena. If the albrecht is duple then the albrecht is undershot. If something macadamise the athena then the athena outpoint the albrecht. If something is duple then it macadamise the athena. If something outpoint the athena then it is duple. If something outpoint the athena then it is duple. If the athena outpoint the albrecht then the athena does not visit the albrecht. The athena is not duple.", "logic": "\nSquabby(athena)\nOutpoint(athena, albrecht)\nnot Rhumba(albrecht, athena)\nforall x (Outpoint(x, albrecht) -> Outpoint(albrecht, athena))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, athena) and Outpoint(x, albrecht) -> Rhumba(albrecht, athena))\nDuple(albrecht) -> Undershot(albrecht)\nforall x (Macadamise(x, athena) -> Outpoint(athena, albrecht))\nforall x (Duple(x) -> Macadamise(x, athena))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, athena) -> Duple(x))\nforall x (Outpoint(x, athena) -> Duple(x))\nOutpoint(athena, albrecht) -> not Rhumba(athena, albrecht)\n\nnot Duple(athena)\n\nforall x (Outpoint(x, athena) -> Duple(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The sturgis is shorthand. The sturgis requite the berta. The berta does not visit the sturgis. If something requite the berta then the berta requite the sturgis. If something requite the sturgis and it requite the berta then the berta steam the sturgis. If the berta is retained then the berta is experient. If something unfasten the sturgis then the sturgis requite the berta. If something is retained then it unfasten the sturgis. If something requite the sturgis then it is retained. If something requite the sturgis then it is retained. If the sturgis requite the berta then the sturgis does not visit the berta. The sturgis unfasten the sturgis.", "logic": "\nShorthand(sturgis)\nRequite(sturgis, berta)\nnot Steam(berta, sturgis)\nforall x (Requite(x, berta) -> Requite(berta, sturgis))\nforall x (Requite(x, sturgis) and Requite(x, berta) -> Steam(berta, sturgis))\nRetained(berta) -> Experient(berta)\nforall x (Unfasten(x, sturgis) -> Requite(sturgis, berta))\nforall x (Retained(x) -> Unfasten(x, sturgis))\nforall x (Requite(x, sturgis) -> Retained(x))\nforall x (Requite(x, sturgis) -> Retained(x))\nRequite(sturgis, berta) -> not Steam(sturgis, berta)\n\nUnfasten(sturgis, sturgis)\n\nforall x (Retained(x) -> Unfasten(x, sturgis)) <- forall x (Requite(x, sturgis) -> Retained(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The janifer is short. The janifer wreak the paloma. The paloma does not visit the janifer. If something wreak the paloma then the paloma wreak the janifer. If something wreak the janifer and it wreak the paloma then the paloma strive the janifer. If the paloma is nonhuman then the paloma is augean. If something spray the janifer then the janifer wreak the paloma. If something is nonhuman then it spray the janifer. If something wreak the janifer then it is nonhuman. If something wreak the janifer then it is nonhuman. If the janifer wreak the paloma then the janifer does not visit the paloma. The paloma is not short.", "logic": "\nShort(janifer)\nWreak(janifer, paloma)\nnot Strive(paloma, janifer)\nforall x (Wreak(x, paloma) -> Wreak(paloma, janifer))\nforall x (Wreak(x, janifer) and Wreak(x, paloma) -> Strive(paloma, janifer))\nNonhuman(paloma) -> Augean(paloma)\nforall x (Spray(x, janifer) -> Wreak(janifer, paloma))\nforall x (Nonhuman(x) -> Spray(x, janifer))\nforall x (Wreak(x, janifer) -> Nonhuman(x))\nforall x (Wreak(x, janifer) -> Nonhuman(x))\nWreak(janifer, paloma) -> not Strive(janifer, paloma)\n\nnot Short(paloma)\n\nnot Short(paloma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The brear is gross. The brear trip the boris. The boris does not visit the brear. If something trip the boris then the boris trip the brear. If something trip the brear and it trip the boris then the boris deglaze the brear. If the boris is conveyable then the boris is touching. If something lour the brear then the brear trip the boris. If something is conveyable then it lour the brear. If something trip the brear then it is conveyable. If something trip the brear then it is conveyable. If the brear trip the boris then the brear does not visit the boris. The boris is cold.", "logic": "\nGross(brear)\nTrip(brear, boris)\nnot Deglaze(boris, brear)\nforall x (Trip(x, boris) -> Trip(boris, brear))\nforall x (Trip(x, brear) and Trip(x, boris) -> Deglaze(boris, brear))\nConveyable(boris) -> Touching(boris)\nforall x (Lour(x, brear) -> Trip(brear, boris))\nforall x (Conveyable(x) -> Lour(x, brear))\nforall x (Trip(x, brear) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Trip(x, brear) -> Conveyable(x))\nTrip(brear, boris) -> not Deglaze(brear, boris)\n\nCold(boris)\n\nCold(boris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The fulvia is steady. The fulvia quarrel the kimmi. The kimmi does not visit the fulvia. If something quarrel the kimmi then the kimmi quarrel the fulvia. If something quarrel the fulvia and it quarrel the kimmi then the kimmi bunch the fulvia. If the kimmi is tempered then the kimmi is stannous. If something overvalue the fulvia then the fulvia quarrel the kimmi. If something is tempered then it overvalue the fulvia. If something quarrel the fulvia then it is tempered. If something quarrel the fulvia then it is tempered. If the fulvia quarrel the kimmi then the fulvia does not visit the kimmi. The fulvia is not cold.", "logic": "\nSteady(fulvia)\nQuarrel(fulvia, kimmi)\nnot Bunch(kimmi, fulvia)\nforall x (Quarrel(x, kimmi) -> Quarrel(kimmi, fulvia))\nforall x (Quarrel(x, fulvia) and Quarrel(x, kimmi) -> Bunch(kimmi, fulvia))\nTempered(kimmi) -> Stannous(kimmi)\nforall x (Overvalue(x, fulvia) -> Quarrel(fulvia, kimmi))\nforall x (Tempered(x) -> Overvalue(x, fulvia))\nforall x (Quarrel(x, fulvia) -> Tempered(x))\nforall x (Quarrel(x, fulvia) -> Tempered(x))\nQuarrel(fulvia, kimmi) -> not Bunch(fulvia, kimmi)\n\nnot Cold(fulvia)\n\nnot Cold(fulvia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The madison is slurred. The madison teach the pamela. The pamela does not visit the madison. If something teach the pamela then the pamela teach the madison. If something teach the madison and it teach the pamela then the pamela slurp the madison. If the pamela is nativistic then the pamela is woeful. If something warp the madison then the madison teach the pamela. If something is nativistic then it warp the madison. If something teach the madison then it is nativistic. If something teach the madison then it is nativistic. If the madison teach the pamela then the madison does not visit the pamela. The madison is red.", "logic": "\nSlurred(madison)\nTeach(madison, pamela)\nnot Slurp(pamela, madison)\nforall x (Teach(x, pamela) -> Teach(pamela, madison))\nforall x (Teach(x, madison) and Teach(x, pamela) -> Slurp(pamela, madison))\nNativistic(pamela) -> Woeful(pamela)\nforall x (Warp(x, madison) -> Teach(madison, pamela))\nforall x (Nativistic(x) -> Warp(x, madison))\nforall x (Teach(x, madison) -> Nativistic(x))\nforall x (Teach(x, madison) -> Nativistic(x))\nTeach(madison, pamela) -> not Slurp(madison, pamela)\n\nRed(madison)\n\nRed(madison) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The helaina is sciatic. The helaina detick the amabel. The amabel does not visit the helaina. If something detick the amabel then the amabel detick the helaina. If something detick the helaina and it detick the amabel then the amabel crisscross the helaina. If the amabel is tendinous then the amabel is disruptive. If something hurry the helaina then the helaina detick the amabel. If something is tendinous then it hurry the helaina. If something detick the helaina then it is tendinous. If something detick the helaina then it is tendinous. If the helaina detick the amabel then the helaina does not visit the amabel. The helaina does not visit the helaina.", "logic": "\nSciatic(helaina)\nDetick(helaina, amabel)\nnot Crisscross(amabel, helaina)\nforall x (Detick(x, amabel) -> Detick(amabel, helaina))\nforall x (Detick(x, helaina) and Detick(x, amabel) -> Crisscross(amabel, helaina))\nTendinous(amabel) -> Disruptive(amabel)\nforall x (Hurry(x, helaina) -> Detick(helaina, amabel))\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> Hurry(x, helaina))\nforall x (Detick(x, helaina) -> Tendinous(x))\nforall x (Detick(x, helaina) -> Tendinous(x))\nDetick(helaina, amabel) -> not Crisscross(helaina, amabel)\n\nnot Crisscross(helaina, helaina)\n\nnot Crisscross(helaina, helaina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "The janey is patellar. The janey poke the alphonse. The alphonse does not visit the janey. If something poke the alphonse then the alphonse poke the janey. If something poke the janey and it poke the alphonse then the alphonse filter the janey. If the alphonse is oligarchic then the alphonse is scrimy. If something mire the janey then the janey poke the alphonse. If something is oligarchic then it mire the janey. If something poke the janey then it is oligarchic. If something poke the janey then it is oligarchic. If the janey poke the alphonse then the janey does not visit the alphonse. The alphonse filter the alphonse.", "logic": "\nPatellar(janey)\nPoke(janey, alphonse)\nnot Filter(alphonse, janey)\nforall x (Poke(x, alphonse) -> Poke(alphonse, janey))\nforall x (Poke(x, janey) and Poke(x, alphonse) -> Filter(alphonse, janey))\nOligarchic(alphonse) -> Scrimy(alphonse)\nforall x (Mire(x, janey) -> Poke(janey, alphonse))\nforall x (Oligarchic(x) -> Mire(x, janey))\nforall x (Poke(x, janey) -> Oligarchic(x))\nforall x (Poke(x, janey) -> Oligarchic(x))\nPoke(janey, alphonse) -> not Filter(janey, alphonse)\n\nFilter(alphonse, alphonse)\n\nFilter(alphonse, alphonse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-169"} {"premises": "Inigo is bindable. Melosa is mated. Darin is shackled. Aimil is bindable. If someone is shackled and not unearned then they are mated. All preferable people are immotile. All shackled people are preferable. Aimil is bindable.", "logic": "\nBindable(inigo)\nMated(melosa)\nShackled(darin)\nBindable(aimil)\nforall x (Shackled(x) and not Unearned(x) -> Mated(x))\nforall x (Preferable(x) -> Immotile(x))\nforall x (Shackled(x) -> Preferable(x))\n\nBindable(aimil)\n\ntherefore Bindable(aimil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Nidia is baleful. Vita is hazy. Dyan is pharaonic. Ansley is baleful. If someone is pharaonic and not ambivalent then they are hazy. All sneaking people are dreamed. All pharaonic people are sneaking. Ansley is not baleful.", "logic": "\nBaleful(nidia)\nHazy(vita)\nPharaonic(dyan)\nBaleful(ansley)\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) and not Ambivalent(x) -> Hazy(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Dreamed(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Sneaking(x))\n\nnot Baleful(ansley)\n\ntherefore Baleful(ansley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Lyndy is worthless. Edouard is curtal. Norrie is extropic. Deloria is worthless. If someone is extropic and not flooded then they are curtal. All mediatory people are exploited. All extropic people are mediatory. Norrie is mediatory.", "logic": "\nWorthless(lyndy)\nCurtal(edouard)\nExtropic(norrie)\nWorthless(deloria)\nforall x (Extropic(x) and not Flooded(x) -> Curtal(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Exploited(x))\nforall x (Extropic(x) -> Mediatory(x))\n\nMediatory(norrie)\n\nExtropic(norrie) and forall x (Extropic(x) -> Mediatory(x)) -> therefore Mediatory(norrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Goose is streetwise. Robby is inelastic. Gilda is beloved. Vachel is streetwise. If someone is beloved and not saleable then they are inelastic. All thwartwise people are serried. All beloved people are thwartwise. Gilda is not thwartwise.", "logic": "\nStreetwise(goose)\nInelastic(robby)\nBeloved(gilda)\nStreetwise(vachel)\nforall x (Beloved(x) and not Saleable(x) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Thwartwise(x) -> Serried(x))\nforall x (Beloved(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\n\nnot Thwartwise(gilda)\n\nBeloved(gilda) and forall x (Beloved(x) -> Thwartwise(x)) -> therefore Thwartwise(gilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Garwood is scaley. Janus is talentless. Jere is ukrainian. Loraine is scaley. If someone is ukrainian and not palladian then they are talentless. All khaki people are generative. All ukrainian people are khaki. Jere is generative.", "logic": "\nScaley(garwood)\nTalentless(janus)\nUkrainian(jere)\nScaley(loraine)\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) and not Palladian(x) -> Talentless(x))\nforall x (Khaki(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Khaki(x))\n\nGenerative(jere)\n\nUkrainian(jere) and forall x (Ukrainian(x) -> Khaki(x)) -> therefore Khaki(jere) Khaki(jere) and forall x (Khaki(x) -> Generative(x)) -> therefore Generative(jere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Cathi is appalled. Jeana is excitable. Cliff is unlimited. Allan is appalled. If someone is unlimited and not innermost then they are excitable. All squashed people are dutiful. All unlimited people are squashed. Cliff is not dutiful.", "logic": "\nAppalled(cathi)\nExcitable(jeana)\nUnlimited(cliff)\nAppalled(allan)\nforall x (Unlimited(x) and not Innermost(x) -> Excitable(x))\nforall x (Squashed(x) -> Dutiful(x))\nforall x (Unlimited(x) -> Squashed(x))\n\nnot Dutiful(cliff)\n\nUnlimited(cliff) and forall x (Unlimited(x) -> Squashed(x)) -> therefore Squashed(cliff) Squashed(cliff) and forall x (Squashed(x) -> Dutiful(x)) -> therefore Dutiful(cliff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Lauralee is analgesic. Paten is weather. Elie is canted. Aubine is analgesic. If someone is canted and not lanceolate then they are weather. All publicized people are undershot. All canted people are publicized. Paten is not publicized.", "logic": "\nAnalgesic(lauralee)\nWeather(paten)\nCanted(elie)\nAnalgesic(aubine)\nforall x (Canted(x) and not Lanceolate(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Publicized(x) -> Undershot(x))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Publicized(x))\n\nnot Publicized(paten)\n\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Publicized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Sissy is joyous. Cyndi is yuman. Theodosia is batholitic. Brian is joyous. If someone is batholitic and not starless then they are yuman. All cambrian people are maniclike. All batholitic people are cambrian. Brian is cambrian.", "logic": "\nJoyous(sissy)\nYuman(cyndi)\nBatholitic(theodosia)\nJoyous(brian)\nforall x (Batholitic(x) and not Starless(x) -> Yuman(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) -> Maniclike(x))\nforall x (Batholitic(x) -> Cambrian(x))\n\nCambrian(brian)\n\nforall x (Batholitic(x) -> Cambrian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Danice is elongate. Alexandra is antitrust. Jeff is acapnotic. Quinton is elongate. If someone is acapnotic and not unexacting then they are antitrust. All unsounded people are zairese. All acapnotic people are unsounded. Alexandra is not zairese.", "logic": "\nElongate(danice)\nAntitrust(alexandra)\nAcapnotic(jeff)\nElongate(quinton)\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) and not Unexacting(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Zairese(x))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Unsounded(x))\n\nnot Zairese(alexandra)\n\nforall x (Unsounded(x) -> Zairese(x)) <- forall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Unsounded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Meyer is galling. Katharina is meshugga. Ingeberg is braw. Thorn is galling. If someone is braw and not buffeted then they are meshugga. All mesmerised people are nutlike. All braw people are mesmerised. Meyer is buffeted.", "logic": "\nGalling(meyer)\nMeshugga(katharina)\nBraw(ingeberg)\nGalling(thorn)\nforall x (Braw(x) and not Buffeted(x) -> Meshugga(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> Nutlike(x))\nforall x (Braw(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\n\nBuffeted(meyer)\n\nBuffeted(meyer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Risa is clubable. Kennedy is bicornate. Amy is engraved. Debbra is clubable. If someone is engraved and not greyed then they are bicornate. All undeclared people are purple. All engraved people are undeclared. Debbra is not engraved.", "logic": "\nClubable(risa)\nBicornate(kennedy)\nEngraved(amy)\nClubable(debbra)\nforall x (Engraved(x) and not Greyed(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Undeclared(x) -> Purple(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Undeclared(x))\n\nnot Engraved(debbra)\n\nnot Engraved(debbra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "Lemmy is peeved. Lou is chiseled. Darrell is chassidic. Ethelda is peeved. If someone is chassidic and not variform then they are chiseled. All greyish people are muscovite. All chassidic people are greyish. Lou is chassidic.", "logic": "\nPeeved(lemmy)\nChiseled(lou)\nChassidic(darrell)\nPeeved(ethelda)\nforall x (Chassidic(x) and not Variform(x) -> Chiseled(x))\nforall x (Greyish(x) -> Muscovite(x))\nforall x (Chassidic(x) -> Greyish(x))\n\nChassidic(lou)\n\nChassidic(lou) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-809"} {"premises": "The selestina is waste. The robert is catalatic. The luci instrument the win. The win soften the luci. Cold people are not nautical. If the robert instrument the win and the robert soften the win then the robert soften the selestina. If someone is waste then they visit the luci. If someone soften the robert and they are not rarified then the robert is not expansive. If someone instrument the luci then the luci is waste. If someone is expansive and they do not like the win then they visit the robert. If someone soften the selestina and they are not rarified then the selestina instrument the luci. If someone preoccupy the robert and they do not visit the luci then the robert preoccupy the selestina. The win soften the luci.", "logic": "\nWaste(selestina)\nCatalatic(robert)\nInstrument(luci, win)\nSoften(win, luci)\nforall x (Expansive(x) -> not Nautical(x))\nInstrument(robert, win) and Soften(robert, win) -> Soften(robert, selestina)\nforall x (Waste(x) -> Instrument(x, luci))\nforall x (Soften(x, robert) and not Rarified(x) -> not Expansive(robert))\nforall x (Instrument(x, luci) -> Waste(luci))\nforall x (Expansive(x) and not Soften(x, win) -> Instrument(x, robert))\nforall x (Soften(x, selestina) and not Rarified(x) -> Instrument(selestina, luci))\nforall x (Preoccupy(x, robert) and not Instrument(x, luci) -> Preoccupy(robert, selestina))\n\nSoften(win, luci)\n\ntherefore Soften(win, luci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The roanna is unproven. The northrop is seventieth. The marjy wobble the irvine. The irvine chivvy the marjy. Cold people are not counter. If the northrop wobble the irvine and the northrop chivvy the irvine then the northrop chivvy the roanna. If someone is unproven then they visit the marjy. If someone chivvy the northrop and they are not saxatile then the northrop is not uniform. If someone wobble the marjy then the marjy is unproven. If someone is uniform and they do not like the irvine then they visit the northrop. If someone chivvy the roanna and they are not saxatile then the roanna wobble the marjy. If someone pepper the northrop and they do not visit the marjy then the northrop pepper the roanna. The roanna is not unproven.", "logic": "\nUnproven(roanna)\nSeventieth(northrop)\nWobble(marjy, irvine)\nChivvy(irvine, marjy)\nforall x (Uniform(x) -> not Counter(x))\nWobble(northrop, irvine) and Chivvy(northrop, irvine) -> Chivvy(northrop, roanna)\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Wobble(x, marjy))\nforall x (Chivvy(x, northrop) and not Saxatile(x) -> not Uniform(northrop))\nforall x (Wobble(x, marjy) -> Unproven(marjy))\nforall x (Uniform(x) and not Chivvy(x, irvine) -> Wobble(x, northrop))\nforall x (Chivvy(x, roanna) and not Saxatile(x) -> Wobble(roanna, marjy))\nforall x (Pepper(x, northrop) and not Wobble(x, marjy) -> Pepper(northrop, roanna))\n\nnot Unproven(roanna)\n\ntherefore Unproven(roanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The eric is dinky. The brynna is homey. The annemarie fizz the sanders. The sanders alkalinise the annemarie. Cold people are not catenulate. If the brynna fizz the sanders and the brynna alkalinise the sanders then the brynna alkalinise the eric. If someone is dinky then they visit the annemarie. If someone alkalinise the brynna and they are not prepacked then the brynna is not creaseless. If someone fizz the annemarie then the annemarie is dinky. If someone is creaseless and they do not like the sanders then they visit the brynna. If someone alkalinise the eric and they are not prepacked then the eric fizz the annemarie. If someone salinate the brynna and they do not visit the annemarie then the brynna salinate the eric. The eric fizz the annemarie.", "logic": "\nDinky(eric)\nHomey(brynna)\nFizz(annemarie, sanders)\nAlkalinise(sanders, annemarie)\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> not Catenulate(x))\nFizz(brynna, sanders) and Alkalinise(brynna, sanders) -> Alkalinise(brynna, eric)\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Fizz(x, annemarie))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, brynna) and not Prepacked(x) -> not Creaseless(brynna))\nforall x (Fizz(x, annemarie) -> Dinky(annemarie))\nforall x (Creaseless(x) and not Alkalinise(x, sanders) -> Fizz(x, brynna))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, eric) and not Prepacked(x) -> Fizz(eric, annemarie))\nforall x (Salinate(x, brynna) and not Fizz(x, annemarie) -> Salinate(brynna, eric))\n\nFizz(eric, annemarie)\n\nDinky(eric) and forall x (Dinky(x) -> Fizz(x, annemarie)) -> therefore Fizz(eric, annemarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The atlanta is tolerant. The amelia is induced. The meaghan cable the haskel. The haskel wane the meaghan. Cold people are not bleak. If the amelia cable the haskel and the amelia wane the haskel then the amelia wane the atlanta. If someone is tolerant then they visit the meaghan. If someone wane the amelia and they are not toadyish then the amelia is not cuspidate. If someone cable the meaghan then the meaghan is tolerant. If someone is cuspidate and they do not like the haskel then they visit the amelia. If someone wane the atlanta and they are not toadyish then the atlanta cable the meaghan. If someone rate the amelia and they do not visit the meaghan then the amelia rate the atlanta. The atlanta does not visit the meaghan.", "logic": "\nTolerant(atlanta)\nInduced(amelia)\nCable(meaghan, haskel)\nWane(haskel, meaghan)\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) -> not Bleak(x))\nCable(amelia, haskel) and Wane(amelia, haskel) -> Wane(amelia, atlanta)\nforall x (Tolerant(x) -> Cable(x, meaghan))\nforall x (Wane(x, amelia) and not Toadyish(x) -> not Cuspidate(amelia))\nforall x (Cable(x, meaghan) -> Tolerant(meaghan))\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) and not Wane(x, haskel) -> Cable(x, amelia))\nforall x (Wane(x, atlanta) and not Toadyish(x) -> Cable(atlanta, meaghan))\nforall x (Rate(x, amelia) and not Cable(x, meaghan) -> Rate(amelia, atlanta))\n\nnot Cable(atlanta, meaghan)\n\nTolerant(atlanta) and forall x (Tolerant(x) -> Cable(x, meaghan)) -> therefore Cable(atlanta, meaghan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The babs is aeriferous. The raye is thick. The austina resift the eben. The eben chouse the austina. Cold people are not dysphoric. If the raye resift the eben and the raye chouse the eben then the raye chouse the babs. If someone is aeriferous then they visit the austina. If someone chouse the raye and they are not previous then the raye is not ramous. If someone resift the austina then the austina is aeriferous. If someone is ramous and they do not like the eben then they visit the raye. If someone chouse the babs and they are not previous then the babs resift the austina. If someone bloat the raye and they do not visit the austina then the raye bloat the babs. The austina is aeriferous.", "logic": "\nAeriferous(babs)\nThick(raye)\nResift(austina, eben)\nChouse(eben, austina)\nforall x (Ramous(x) -> not Dysphoric(x))\nResift(raye, eben) and Chouse(raye, eben) -> Chouse(raye, babs)\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) -> Resift(x, austina))\nforall x (Chouse(x, raye) and not Previous(x) -> not Ramous(raye))\nforall x (Resift(x, austina) -> Aeriferous(austina))\nforall x (Ramous(x) and not Chouse(x, eben) -> Resift(x, raye))\nforall x (Chouse(x, babs) and not Previous(x) -> Resift(babs, austina))\nforall x (Bloat(x, raye) and not Resift(x, austina) -> Bloat(raye, babs))\n\nAeriferous(austina)\n\nAeriferous(babs) and forall x (Aeriferous(x) -> Resift(x, austina)) -> therefore Resift(babs, austina) Resift(babs, austina) and forall x (Resift(x, austina) -> Aeriferous(austina)) -> therefore Aeriferous(austina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The ashby is taciturn. The tally is despotical. The tynan stupefy the nikolia. The nikolia quell the tynan. Cold people are not nosey. If the tally stupefy the nikolia and the tally quell the nikolia then the tally quell the ashby. If someone is taciturn then they visit the tynan. If someone quell the tally and they are not barred then the tally is not ugandan. If someone stupefy the tynan then the tynan is taciturn. If someone is ugandan and they do not like the nikolia then they visit the tally. If someone quell the ashby and they are not barred then the ashby stupefy the tynan. If someone foreshadow the tally and they do not visit the tynan then the tally foreshadow the ashby. The tynan is not taciturn.", "logic": "\nTaciturn(ashby)\nDespotical(tally)\nStupefy(tynan, nikolia)\nQuell(nikolia, tynan)\nforall x (Ugandan(x) -> not Nosey(x))\nStupefy(tally, nikolia) and Quell(tally, nikolia) -> Quell(tally, ashby)\nforall x (Taciturn(x) -> Stupefy(x, tynan))\nforall x (Quell(x, tally) and not Barred(x) -> not Ugandan(tally))\nforall x (Stupefy(x, tynan) -> Taciturn(tynan))\nforall x (Ugandan(x) and not Quell(x, nikolia) -> Stupefy(x, tally))\nforall x (Quell(x, ashby) and not Barred(x) -> Stupefy(ashby, tynan))\nforall x (Foreshadow(x, tally) and not Stupefy(x, tynan) -> Foreshadow(tally, ashby))\n\nnot Taciturn(tynan)\n\nTaciturn(ashby) and forall x (Taciturn(x) -> Stupefy(x, tynan)) -> therefore Stupefy(ashby, tynan) Stupefy(ashby, tynan) and forall x (Stupefy(x, tynan) -> Taciturn(tynan)) -> therefore Taciturn(tynan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The alida is clotted. The brady is pupillary. The isabella rework the viviene. The viviene poniard the isabella. Cold people are not poignant. If the brady rework the viviene and the brady poniard the viviene then the brady poniard the alida. If someone is clotted then they visit the isabella. If someone poniard the brady and they are not teeny then the brady is not consolable. If someone rework the isabella then the isabella is clotted. If someone is consolable and they do not like the viviene then they visit the brady. If someone poniard the alida and they are not teeny then the alida rework the isabella. If someone paddle the brady and they do not visit the isabella then the brady paddle the alida. The isabella rework the isabella.", "logic": "\nClotted(alida)\nPupillary(brady)\nRework(isabella, viviene)\nPoniard(viviene, isabella)\nforall x (Consolable(x) -> not Poignant(x))\nRework(brady, viviene) and Poniard(brady, viviene) -> Poniard(brady, alida)\nforall x (Clotted(x) -> Rework(x, isabella))\nforall x (Poniard(x, brady) and not Teeny(x) -> not Consolable(brady))\nforall x (Rework(x, isabella) -> Clotted(isabella))\nforall x (Consolable(x) and not Poniard(x, viviene) -> Rework(x, brady))\nforall x (Poniard(x, alida) and not Teeny(x) -> Rework(alida, isabella))\nforall x (Paddle(x, brady) and not Rework(x, isabella) -> Paddle(brady, alida))\n\nRework(isabella, isabella)\n\nClotted(alida) and forall x (Clotted(x) -> Rework(x, isabella)) -> therefore Rework(alida, isabella) Rework(alida, isabella) and forall x (Rework(x, isabella) -> Clotted(isabella)) -> therefore Clotted(isabella) Clotted(isabella) and forall x (Clotted(x) -> Rework(x, isabella)) -> therefore Rework(isabella, isabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The marta is ceruminous. The cristy is blubbery. The sisile scale the izak. The izak bicker the sisile. Cold people are not spanish. If the cristy scale the izak and the cristy bicker the izak then the cristy bicker the marta. If someone is ceruminous then they visit the sisile. If someone bicker the cristy and they are not salable then the cristy is not salubrious. If someone scale the sisile then the sisile is ceruminous. If someone is salubrious and they do not like the izak then they visit the cristy. If someone bicker the marta and they are not salable then the marta scale the sisile. If someone qualify the cristy and they do not visit the sisile then the cristy qualify the marta. The sisile does not visit the sisile.", "logic": "\nCeruminous(marta)\nBlubbery(cristy)\nScale(sisile, izak)\nBicker(izak, sisile)\nforall x (Salubrious(x) -> not Spanish(x))\nScale(cristy, izak) and Bicker(cristy, izak) -> Bicker(cristy, marta)\nforall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Scale(x, sisile))\nforall x (Bicker(x, cristy) and not Salable(x) -> not Salubrious(cristy))\nforall x (Scale(x, sisile) -> Ceruminous(sisile))\nforall x (Salubrious(x) and not Bicker(x, izak) -> Scale(x, cristy))\nforall x (Bicker(x, marta) and not Salable(x) -> Scale(marta, sisile))\nforall x (Qualify(x, cristy) and not Scale(x, sisile) -> Qualify(cristy, marta))\n\nnot Scale(sisile, sisile)\n\nCeruminous(marta) and forall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Scale(x, sisile)) -> therefore Scale(marta, sisile) Scale(marta, sisile) and forall x (Scale(x, sisile) -> Ceruminous(sisile)) -> therefore Ceruminous(sisile) Ceruminous(sisile) and forall x (Ceruminous(x) -> Scale(x, sisile)) -> therefore Scale(sisile, sisile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The mitchel is upper. The napoleon is ismaili. The jada shrine the hyatt. The hyatt hint the jada. Cold people are not forward. If the napoleon shrine the hyatt and the napoleon hint the hyatt then the napoleon hint the mitchel. If someone is upper then they visit the jada. If someone hint the napoleon and they are not lone then the napoleon is not pucka. If someone shrine the jada then the jada is upper. If someone is pucka and they do not like the hyatt then they visit the napoleon. If someone hint the mitchel and they are not lone then the mitchel shrine the jada. If someone deface the napoleon and they do not visit the jada then the napoleon deface the mitchel. The napoleon does not see the mitchel.", "logic": "\nUpper(mitchel)\nIsmaili(napoleon)\nShrine(jada, hyatt)\nHint(hyatt, jada)\nforall x (Pucka(x) -> not Forward(x))\nShrine(napoleon, hyatt) and Hint(napoleon, hyatt) -> Hint(napoleon, mitchel)\nforall x (Upper(x) -> Shrine(x, jada))\nforall x (Hint(x, napoleon) and not Lone(x) -> not Pucka(napoleon))\nforall x (Shrine(x, jada) -> Upper(jada))\nforall x (Pucka(x) and not Hint(x, hyatt) -> Shrine(x, napoleon))\nforall x (Hint(x, mitchel) and not Lone(x) -> Shrine(mitchel, jada))\nforall x (Deface(x, napoleon) and not Shrine(x, jada) -> Deface(napoleon, mitchel))\n\nnot Deface(napoleon, mitchel)\n\nforall x (Deface(x, napoleon) and not Shrine(x, jada) -> Deface(napoleon, mitchel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The ingeborg is auriculate. The elfrida is edged. The yonina sample the michael. The michael verdigris the yonina. Cold people are not lxxi. If the elfrida sample the michael and the elfrida verdigris the michael then the elfrida verdigris the ingeborg. If someone is auriculate then they visit the yonina. If someone verdigris the elfrida and they are not panoptic then the elfrida is not true. If someone sample the yonina then the yonina is auriculate. If someone is true and they do not like the michael then they visit the elfrida. If someone verdigris the ingeborg and they are not panoptic then the ingeborg sample the yonina. If someone bream the elfrida and they do not visit the yonina then the elfrida bream the ingeborg. The michael sample the yonina.", "logic": "\nAuriculate(ingeborg)\nEdged(elfrida)\nSample(yonina, michael)\nVerdigris(michael, yonina)\nforall x (True(x) -> not Lxxi(x))\nSample(elfrida, michael) and Verdigris(elfrida, michael) -> Verdigris(elfrida, ingeborg)\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Sample(x, yonina))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, elfrida) and not Panoptic(x) -> not True(elfrida))\nforall x (Sample(x, yonina) -> Auriculate(yonina))\nforall x (True(x) and not Verdigris(x, michael) -> Sample(x, elfrida))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, ingeborg) and not Panoptic(x) -> Sample(ingeborg, yonina))\nforall x (Bream(x, elfrida) and not Sample(x, yonina) -> Bream(elfrida, ingeborg))\n\nSample(michael, yonina)\n\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Sample(x, yonina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The sebastien is transonic. The katalin is bicolored. The lishe process the arianne. The arianne orate the lishe. Cold people are not tangled. If the katalin process the arianne and the katalin orate the arianne then the katalin orate the sebastien. If someone is transonic then they visit the lishe. If someone orate the katalin and they are not volumetric then the katalin is not panoplied. If someone process the lishe then the lishe is transonic. If someone is panoplied and they do not like the arianne then they visit the katalin. If someone orate the sebastien and they are not volumetric then the sebastien process the lishe. If someone bifurcate the katalin and they do not visit the lishe then the katalin bifurcate the sebastien. The arianne does not visit the katalin.", "logic": "\nTransonic(sebastien)\nBicolored(katalin)\nProcess(lishe, arianne)\nOrate(arianne, lishe)\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> not Tangled(x))\nProcess(katalin, arianne) and Orate(katalin, arianne) -> Orate(katalin, sebastien)\nforall x (Transonic(x) -> Process(x, lishe))\nforall x (Orate(x, katalin) and not Volumetric(x) -> not Panoplied(katalin))\nforall x (Process(x, lishe) -> Transonic(lishe))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and not Orate(x, arianne) -> Process(x, katalin))\nforall x (Orate(x, sebastien) and not Volumetric(x) -> Process(sebastien, lishe))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, katalin) and not Process(x, lishe) -> Bifurcate(katalin, sebastien))\n\nnot Process(arianne, katalin)\n\nforall x (Panoplied(x) and not Orate(x, arianne) -> Process(x, katalin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The maryann is funguslike. The mohan is pejorative. The douglass edge the karry. The karry pullulate the douglass. Cold people are not melted. If the mohan edge the karry and the mohan pullulate the karry then the mohan pullulate the maryann. If someone is funguslike then they visit the douglass. If someone pullulate the mohan and they are not supperless then the mohan is not bacillary. If someone edge the douglass then the douglass is funguslike. If someone is bacillary and they do not like the karry then they visit the mohan. If someone pullulate the maryann and they are not supperless then the maryann edge the douglass. If someone brave the mohan and they do not visit the douglass then the mohan brave the maryann. The maryann edge the mohan.", "logic": "\nFunguslike(maryann)\nPejorative(mohan)\nEdge(douglass, karry)\nPullulate(karry, douglass)\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> not Melted(x))\nEdge(mohan, karry) and Pullulate(mohan, karry) -> Pullulate(mohan, maryann)\nforall x (Funguslike(x) -> Edge(x, douglass))\nforall x (Pullulate(x, mohan) and not Supperless(x) -> not Bacillary(mohan))\nforall x (Edge(x, douglass) -> Funguslike(douglass))\nforall x (Bacillary(x) and not Pullulate(x, karry) -> Edge(x, mohan))\nforall x (Pullulate(x, maryann) and not Supperless(x) -> Edge(maryann, douglass))\nforall x (Brave(x, mohan) and not Edge(x, douglass) -> Brave(mohan, maryann))\n\nEdge(maryann, mohan)\n\nforall x (Bacillary(x) and not Pullulate(x, karry) -> Edge(x, mohan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The grover is unpunctual. The sarajane is satyrical. The bryon gush the reggi. The reggi astonish the bryon. Cold people are not mystified. If the sarajane gush the reggi and the sarajane astonish the reggi then the sarajane astonish the grover. If someone is unpunctual then they visit the bryon. If someone astonish the sarajane and they are not archaean then the sarajane is not provoking. If someone gush the bryon then the bryon is unpunctual. If someone is provoking and they do not like the reggi then they visit the sarajane. If someone astonish the grover and they are not archaean then the grover gush the bryon. If someone repot the sarajane and they do not visit the bryon then the sarajane repot the grover. The grover does not like the reggi.", "logic": "\nUnpunctual(grover)\nSatyrical(sarajane)\nGush(bryon, reggi)\nAstonish(reggi, bryon)\nforall x (Provoking(x) -> not Mystified(x))\nGush(sarajane, reggi) and Astonish(sarajane, reggi) -> Astonish(sarajane, grover)\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Gush(x, bryon))\nforall x (Astonish(x, sarajane) and not Archaean(x) -> not Provoking(sarajane))\nforall x (Gush(x, bryon) -> Unpunctual(bryon))\nforall x (Provoking(x) and not Astonish(x, reggi) -> Gush(x, sarajane))\nforall x (Astonish(x, grover) and not Archaean(x) -> Gush(grover, bryon))\nforall x (Repot(x, sarajane) and not Gush(x, bryon) -> Repot(sarajane, grover))\n\nnot Astonish(grover, reggi)\n\nnot Astonish(grover, reggi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The suzi is snaky. The harv is orienting. The fionnula molt the myron. The myron torment the fionnula. Cold people are not crowded. If the harv molt the myron and the harv torment the myron then the harv torment the suzi. If someone is snaky then they visit the fionnula. If someone torment the harv and they are not redeemable then the harv is not moveable. If someone molt the fionnula then the fionnula is snaky. If someone is moveable and they do not like the myron then they visit the harv. If someone torment the suzi and they are not redeemable then the suzi molt the fionnula. If someone raven the harv and they do not visit the fionnula then the harv raven the suzi. The myron molt the myron.", "logic": "\nSnaky(suzi)\nOrienting(harv)\nMolt(fionnula, myron)\nTorment(myron, fionnula)\nforall x (Moveable(x) -> not Crowded(x))\nMolt(harv, myron) and Torment(harv, myron) -> Torment(harv, suzi)\nforall x (Snaky(x) -> Molt(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Torment(x, harv) and not Redeemable(x) -> not Moveable(harv))\nforall x (Molt(x, fionnula) -> Snaky(fionnula))\nforall x (Moveable(x) and not Torment(x, myron) -> Molt(x, harv))\nforall x (Torment(x, suzi) and not Redeemable(x) -> Molt(suzi, fionnula))\nforall x (Raven(x, harv) and not Molt(x, fionnula) -> Raven(harv, suzi))\n\nMolt(myron, myron)\n\nMolt(myron, myron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The charissa is cosmologic. The jenni is unfirm. The reece congregate the franklyn. The franklyn divest the reece. Cold people are not scrambled. If the jenni congregate the franklyn and the jenni divest the franklyn then the jenni divest the charissa. If someone is cosmologic then they visit the reece. If someone divest the jenni and they are not erect then the jenni is not moldable. If someone congregate the reece then the reece is cosmologic. If someone is moldable and they do not like the franklyn then they visit the jenni. If someone divest the charissa and they are not erect then the charissa congregate the reece. If someone fress the jenni and they do not visit the reece then the jenni fress the charissa. The reece does not see the reece.", "logic": "\nCosmologic(charissa)\nUnfirm(jenni)\nCongregate(reece, franklyn)\nDivest(franklyn, reece)\nforall x (Moldable(x) -> not Scrambled(x))\nCongregate(jenni, franklyn) and Divest(jenni, franklyn) -> Divest(jenni, charissa)\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Congregate(x, reece))\nforall x (Divest(x, jenni) and not Erect(x) -> not Moldable(jenni))\nforall x (Congregate(x, reece) -> Cosmologic(reece))\nforall x (Moldable(x) and not Divest(x, franklyn) -> Congregate(x, jenni))\nforall x (Divest(x, charissa) and not Erect(x) -> Congregate(charissa, reece))\nforall x (Fress(x, jenni) and not Congregate(x, reece) -> Fress(jenni, charissa))\n\nnot Fress(reece, reece)\n\nnot Fress(reece, reece) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "The krysta is most. The elga is foreign. The matilda sniffle the juline. The juline dodder the matilda. Cold people are not spiderlike. If the elga sniffle the juline and the elga dodder the juline then the elga dodder the krysta. If someone is most then they visit the matilda. If someone dodder the elga and they are not stabbing then the elga is not inflated. If someone sniffle the matilda then the matilda is most. If someone is inflated and they do not like the juline then they visit the elga. If someone dodder the krysta and they are not stabbing then the krysta sniffle the matilda. If someone metabolise the elga and they do not visit the matilda then the elga metabolise the krysta. The elga dodder the elga.", "logic": "\nMost(krysta)\nForeign(elga)\nSniffle(matilda, juline)\nDodder(juline, matilda)\nforall x (Inflated(x) -> not Spiderlike(x))\nSniffle(elga, juline) and Dodder(elga, juline) -> Dodder(elga, krysta)\nforall x (Most(x) -> Sniffle(x, matilda))\nforall x (Dodder(x, elga) and not Stabbing(x) -> not Inflated(elga))\nforall x (Sniffle(x, matilda) -> Most(matilda))\nforall x (Inflated(x) and not Dodder(x, juline) -> Sniffle(x, elga))\nforall x (Dodder(x, krysta) and not Stabbing(x) -> Sniffle(krysta, matilda))\nforall x (Metabolise(x, elga) and not Sniffle(x, matilda) -> Metabolise(elga, krysta))\n\nDodder(elga, elga)\n\nDodder(elga, elga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-873"} {"premises": "Coleman is not sordid. Coleman is dutiful. Mona is billion. Mona is araceous. Sherline is billion. Sherline is not riotous. Tremain is billion. Tremain is araceous. Tremain is riotous. Tremain is dutiful. If someone is sordid then they are billion. If someone is revered then they are not dutiful. If Coleman is sordid then Coleman is interred. Young people are riotous. All dutiful, billion people are araceous. If someone is riotous and not billion then they are not araceous. Young people are not interred. If someone is araceous and not revered then they are interred. Coleman is not sordid.", "logic": "\nnot Sordid(coleman)\nDutiful(coleman)\nBillion(mona)\nAraceous(mona)\nBillion(sherline)\nnot Riotous(sherline)\nBillion(tremain)\nAraceous(tremain)\nRiotous(tremain)\nDutiful(tremain)\nforall x (Sordid(x) -> Billion(x))\nforall x (Revered(x) -> not Dutiful(x))\nSordid(coleman) -> Interred(coleman)\nforall x (Dutiful(x) -> Riotous(x))\nforall x (Dutiful(x) and Billion(x) -> Araceous(x))\nforall x (Riotous(x) and not Billion(x) -> not Araceous(x))\nforall x (Dutiful(x) -> not Interred(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) and not Revered(x) -> Interred(x))\n\nnot Sordid(coleman)\n\ntherefore not Sordid(coleman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6145"} {"premises": "Katherina is not autogamous. Katherina is foliate. Sauncho is jaundiced. Sauncho is elderly. Gae is jaundiced. Gae is not extant. Marni is jaundiced. Marni is elderly. Marni is extant. Marni is foliate. If someone is autogamous then they are jaundiced. If someone is human then they are not foliate. If Katherina is autogamous then Katherina is eleven. Young people are extant. All foliate, jaundiced people are elderly. If someone is extant and not jaundiced then they are not elderly. Young people are not eleven. If someone is elderly and not human then they are eleven. Marni is not elderly.", "logic": "\nnot Autogamous(katherina)\nFoliate(katherina)\nJaundiced(sauncho)\nElderly(sauncho)\nJaundiced(gae)\nnot Extant(gae)\nJaundiced(marni)\nElderly(marni)\nExtant(marni)\nFoliate(marni)\nforall x (Autogamous(x) -> Jaundiced(x))\nforall x (Human(x) -> not Foliate(x))\nAutogamous(katherina) -> Eleven(katherina)\nforall x (Foliate(x) -> Extant(x))\nforall x (Foliate(x) and Jaundiced(x) -> Elderly(x))\nforall x (Extant(x) and not Jaundiced(x) -> not Elderly(x))\nforall x (Foliate(x) -> not Eleven(x))\nforall x (Elderly(x) and not Human(x) -> Eleven(x))\n\nnot Elderly(marni)\n\ntherefore Elderly(marni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6145"} {"premises": "Annissa is not floored. Annissa is processed. Kirsti is gradual. Kirsti is simplex. Markus is gradual. Markus is not viii. Xenia is gradual. Xenia is simplex. Xenia is viii. Xenia is processed. If someone is floored then they are gradual. If someone is leisurely then they are not processed. If Annissa is floored then Annissa is unavailing. Young people are viii. All processed, gradual people are simplex. If someone is viii and not gradual then they are not simplex. Young people are not unavailing. If someone is simplex and not leisurely then they are unavailing. Kirsti is not unavailing.", "logic": "\nnot Floored(annissa)\nProcessed(annissa)\nGradual(kirsti)\nSimplex(kirsti)\nGradual(markus)\nnot Viii(markus)\nGradual(xenia)\nSimplex(xenia)\nViii(xenia)\nProcessed(xenia)\nforall x (Floored(x) -> Gradual(x))\nforall x (Leisurely(x) -> not Processed(x))\nFloored(annissa) -> Unavailing(annissa)\nforall x (Processed(x) -> Viii(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) and Gradual(x) -> Simplex(x))\nforall x (Viii(x) and not Gradual(x) -> not Simplex(x))\nforall x (Processed(x) -> not Unavailing(x))\nforall x (Simplex(x) and not Leisurely(x) -> Unavailing(x))\n\nnot Unavailing(kirsti)\n\nforall x (Simplex(x) and not Leisurely(x) -> Unavailing(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6145"} {"premises": "Kristy is not mini. Kristy is uninviting. Niall is unrested. Niall is endocrine. Shirah is unrested. Shirah is not glaring. Dominica is unrested. Dominica is endocrine. Dominica is glaring. Dominica is uninviting. If someone is mini then they are unrested. If someone is colonized then they are not uninviting. If Kristy is mini then Kristy is umpteen. Young people are glaring. All uninviting, unrested people are endocrine. If someone is glaring and not unrested then they are not endocrine. Young people are not umpteen. If someone is endocrine and not colonized then they are umpteen. Niall is mini.", "logic": "\nnot Mini(kristy)\nUninviting(kristy)\nUnrested(niall)\nEndocrine(niall)\nUnrested(shirah)\nnot Glaring(shirah)\nUnrested(dominica)\nEndocrine(dominica)\nGlaring(dominica)\nUninviting(dominica)\nforall x (Mini(x) -> Unrested(x))\nforall x (Colonized(x) -> not Uninviting(x))\nMini(kristy) -> Umpteen(kristy)\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) and Unrested(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) and not Unrested(x) -> not Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Uninviting(x) -> not Umpteen(x))\nforall x (Endocrine(x) and not Colonized(x) -> Umpteen(x))\n\nMini(niall)\n\nMini(niall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6145"} {"premises": "The rochelle is profuse. The carline panel the rochelle. The carline panel the rosy. The carline chamber the rosy. The carline look the rochelle. The carline look the westbrook. The westbrook panel the rochelle. The westbrook chamber the rochelle. The westbrook chamber the rosy. The westbrook is proper. The westbrook look the carline. The rosy is imitative. If someone chamber the rosy then the rosy look the carline. If someone is prolate and they chase the rosy then the rosy look the rochelle. If someone panel the rochelle and they visit the westbrook then the westbrook chamber the rochelle. If someone panel the rochelle then they visit the rochelle. Nice, imitative people are proper. If someone is prolate and profuse then they visit the carline. The carline look the westbrook.", "logic": "\nProfuse(rochelle)\nPanel(carline, rochelle)\nPanel(carline, rosy)\nChamber(carline, rosy)\nLook(carline, rochelle)\nLook(carline, westbrook)\nPanel(westbrook, rochelle)\nChamber(westbrook, rochelle)\nChamber(westbrook, rosy)\nProper(westbrook)\nLook(westbrook, carline)\nImitative(rosy)\nforall x (Chamber(x, rosy) -> Look(rosy, carline))\nforall x (Prolate(x) and Panel(x, rosy) -> Look(rosy, rochelle))\nforall x (Panel(x, rochelle) and Look(x, westbrook) -> Chamber(westbrook, rochelle))\nforall x (Panel(x, rochelle) -> Look(x, rochelle))\nforall x (Prolate(x) and Imitative(x) -> Proper(x))\nforall x (Prolate(x) and Profuse(x) -> Look(x, carline))\n\nLook(carline, westbrook)\n\ntherefore Look(carline, westbrook)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3126"} {"premises": "The beverly is chary. The jordon whisk the beverly. The jordon whisk the rad. The jordon reflate the rad. The jordon commence the beverly. The jordon commence the emmery. The emmery whisk the beverly. The emmery reflate the beverly. The emmery reflate the rad. The emmery is atlantic. The emmery commence the jordon. The rad is indicatory. If someone reflate the rad then the rad commence the jordon. If someone is miniscule and they chase the rad then the rad commence the beverly. If someone whisk the beverly and they visit the emmery then the emmery reflate the beverly. If someone whisk the beverly then they visit the beverly. Nice, indicatory people are atlantic. If someone is miniscule and chary then they visit the jordon. The emmery does not chase the beverly.", "logic": "\nChary(beverly)\nWhisk(jordon, beverly)\nWhisk(jordon, rad)\nReflate(jordon, rad)\nCommence(jordon, beverly)\nCommence(jordon, emmery)\nWhisk(emmery, beverly)\nReflate(emmery, beverly)\nReflate(emmery, rad)\nAtlantic(emmery)\nCommence(emmery, jordon)\nIndicatory(rad)\nforall x (Reflate(x, rad) -> Commence(rad, jordon))\nforall x (Miniscule(x) and Whisk(x, rad) -> Commence(rad, beverly))\nforall x (Whisk(x, beverly) and Commence(x, emmery) -> Reflate(emmery, beverly))\nforall x (Whisk(x, beverly) -> Commence(x, beverly))\nforall x (Miniscule(x) and Indicatory(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Miniscule(x) and Chary(x) -> Commence(x, jordon))\n\nnot Whisk(emmery, beverly)\n\ntherefore Whisk(emmery, beverly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3126"} {"premises": "The maressa is bahamian. The morly sinter the maressa. The morly sinter the jennica. The morly elide the jennica. The morly accomplish the maressa. The morly accomplish the colline. The colline sinter the maressa. The colline elide the maressa. The colline elide the jennica. The colline is liturgical. The colline accomplish the morly. The jennica is reparable. If someone elide the jennica then the jennica accomplish the morly. If someone is wieldy and they chase the jennica then the jennica accomplish the maressa. If someone sinter the maressa and they visit the colline then the colline elide the maressa. If someone sinter the maressa then they visit the maressa. Nice, reparable people are liturgical. If someone is wieldy and bahamian then they visit the morly. The jennica is not liturgical.", "logic": "\nBahamian(maressa)\nSinter(morly, maressa)\nSinter(morly, jennica)\nElide(morly, jennica)\nAccomplish(morly, maressa)\nAccomplish(morly, colline)\nSinter(colline, maressa)\nElide(colline, maressa)\nElide(colline, jennica)\nLiturgical(colline)\nAccomplish(colline, morly)\nReparable(jennica)\nforall x (Elide(x, jennica) -> Accomplish(jennica, morly))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and Sinter(x, jennica) -> Accomplish(jennica, maressa))\nforall x (Sinter(x, maressa) and Accomplish(x, colline) -> Elide(colline, maressa))\nforall x (Sinter(x, maressa) -> Accomplish(x, maressa))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and Reparable(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and Bahamian(x) -> Accomplish(x, morly))\n\nnot Liturgical(jennica)\n\nforall x (Wieldy(x) and Reparable(x) -> Liturgical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3126"} {"premises": "The liz is ridged. The jami hyphen the liz. The jami hyphen the cinda. The jami taper the cinda. The jami harshen the liz. The jami harshen the etienne. The etienne hyphen the liz. The etienne taper the liz. The etienne taper the cinda. The etienne is hastate. The etienne harshen the jami. The cinda is antiphonal. If someone taper the cinda then the cinda harshen the jami. If someone is eventual and they chase the cinda then the cinda harshen the liz. If someone hyphen the liz and they visit the etienne then the etienne taper the liz. If someone hyphen the liz then they visit the liz. Nice, antiphonal people are hastate. If someone is eventual and ridged then they visit the jami. The etienne harshen the cinda.", "logic": "\nRidged(liz)\nHyphen(jami, liz)\nHyphen(jami, cinda)\nTaper(jami, cinda)\nHarshen(jami, liz)\nHarshen(jami, etienne)\nHyphen(etienne, liz)\nTaper(etienne, liz)\nTaper(etienne, cinda)\nHastate(etienne)\nHarshen(etienne, jami)\nAntiphonal(cinda)\nforall x (Taper(x, cinda) -> Harshen(cinda, jami))\nforall x (Eventual(x) and Hyphen(x, cinda) -> Harshen(cinda, liz))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, liz) and Harshen(x, etienne) -> Taper(etienne, liz))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, liz) -> Harshen(x, liz))\nforall x (Eventual(x) and Antiphonal(x) -> Hastate(x))\nforall x (Eventual(x) and Ridged(x) -> Harshen(x, jami))\n\nHarshen(etienne, cinda)\n\nHarshen(etienne, cinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3126"} {"premises": "Bea is dissident. Bea is crack. Bea is bromidic. Bea is hawkish. Bea is expiatory. Neely is dissident. Neely is buffoonish. Neely is crack. Neely is not waspish. Neely is bromidic. Neely is hawkish. Neely is expiatory. If Neely is dissident then Neely is expiatory. If something is waspish then it is not bromidic. Big, crack things are bromidic. All hawkish, buffoonish things are bromidic. If something is buffoonish and not dissident then it is expiatory. If something is waspish and not buffoonish then it is expiatory. If Bea is hawkish and Bea is not crack then Bea is expiatory. If something is crack then it is not waspish. Neely is not waspish.", "logic": "\nDissident(bea)\nCrack(bea)\nBromidic(bea)\nHawkish(bea)\nExpiatory(bea)\nDissident(neely)\nBuffoonish(neely)\nCrack(neely)\nnot Waspish(neely)\nBromidic(neely)\nHawkish(neely)\nExpiatory(neely)\nDissident(neely) -> Expiatory(neely)\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> not Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Dissident(x) and Crack(x) -> Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and Buffoonish(x) -> Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Buffoonish(x) and not Dissident(x) -> Expiatory(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) and not Buffoonish(x) -> Expiatory(x))\nHawkish(bea) and not Crack(bea) -> Expiatory(bea)\nforall x (Crack(x) -> not Waspish(x))\n\nnot Waspish(neely)\n\ntherefore not Waspish(neely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3623"} {"premises": "Cleo is hired. Cleo is harried. Cleo is sprigged. Cleo is indurate. Cleo is prehensile. Aubrie is hired. Aubrie is modular. Aubrie is harried. Aubrie is not venomed. Aubrie is sprigged. Aubrie is indurate. Aubrie is prehensile. If Aubrie is hired then Aubrie is prehensile. If something is venomed then it is not sprigged. Big, harried things are sprigged. All indurate, modular things are sprigged. If something is modular and not hired then it is prehensile. If something is venomed and not modular then it is prehensile. If Cleo is indurate and Cleo is not harried then Cleo is prehensile. If something is harried then it is not venomed. Aubrie is not harried.", "logic": "\nHired(cleo)\nHarried(cleo)\nSprigged(cleo)\nIndurate(cleo)\nPrehensile(cleo)\nHired(aubrie)\nModular(aubrie)\nHarried(aubrie)\nnot Venomed(aubrie)\nSprigged(aubrie)\nIndurate(aubrie)\nPrehensile(aubrie)\nHired(aubrie) -> Prehensile(aubrie)\nforall x (Venomed(x) -> not Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Hired(x) and Harried(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and Modular(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Modular(x) and not Hired(x) -> Prehensile(x))\nforall x (Venomed(x) and not Modular(x) -> Prehensile(x))\nIndurate(cleo) and not Harried(cleo) -> Prehensile(cleo)\nforall x (Harried(x) -> not Venomed(x))\n\nnot Harried(aubrie)\n\ntherefore Harried(aubrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3623"} {"premises": "Gwynne is raddled. Gwynne is anecdotic. Gwynne is infrared. Gwynne is colonic. Maynard is raddled. Maynard is anecdotic. Maynard is neoplastic. Maynard is infrared. Maynard is conforming. Maynard is colonic. White people are unaged. Rough, colonic people are conforming. All unaged, colonic people are anecdotic. Gwynne is raddled.", "logic": "\nRaddled(gwynne)\nAnecdotic(gwynne)\nInfrared(gwynne)\nColonic(gwynne)\nRaddled(maynard)\nAnecdotic(maynard)\nNeoplastic(maynard)\nInfrared(maynard)\nConforming(maynard)\nColonic(maynard)\nforall x (Colonic(x) -> Unaged(x))\nforall x (Unaged(x) and Colonic(x) -> Conforming(x))\nforall x (Unaged(x) and Colonic(x) -> Anecdotic(x))\n\nRaddled(gwynne)\n\ntherefore Raddled(gwynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Kira is inmost. Kira is lavender. Kira is cheliceral. Kira is damaging. Mada is inmost. Mada is lavender. Mada is catamenial. Mada is cheliceral. Mada is affiliated. Mada is damaging. White people are viatical. Rough, damaging people are affiliated. All viatical, damaging people are lavender. Mada is not cheliceral.", "logic": "\nInmost(kira)\nLavender(kira)\nCheliceral(kira)\nDamaging(kira)\nInmost(mada)\nLavender(mada)\nCatamenial(mada)\nCheliceral(mada)\nAffiliated(mada)\nDamaging(mada)\nforall x (Damaging(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) and Damaging(x) -> Affiliated(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) and Damaging(x) -> Lavender(x))\n\nnot Cheliceral(mada)\n\ntherefore Cheliceral(mada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Merwin is patched. Merwin is vindicated. Merwin is pent. Merwin is untypical. Beverie is patched. Beverie is vindicated. Beverie is ambagious. Beverie is pent. Beverie is weaned. Beverie is untypical. White people are unstarred. Rough, untypical people are weaned. All unstarred, untypical people are vindicated. Beverie is unstarred.", "logic": "\nPatched(merwin)\nVindicated(merwin)\nPent(merwin)\nUntypical(merwin)\nPatched(beverie)\nVindicated(beverie)\nAmbagious(beverie)\nPent(beverie)\nWeaned(beverie)\nUntypical(beverie)\nforall x (Untypical(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and Untypical(x) -> Weaned(x))\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and Untypical(x) -> Vindicated(x))\n\nUnstarred(beverie)\n\nUntypical(beverie) and forall x (Untypical(x) -> Unstarred(x)) -> therefore Unstarred(beverie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Abra is fanlike. Abra is peopled. Abra is aimless. Abra is bavarian. Kippie is fanlike. Kippie is peopled. Kippie is front. Kippie is aimless. Kippie is baptized. Kippie is bavarian. White people are insolvable. Rough, bavarian people are baptized. All insolvable, bavarian people are peopled. Abra is not insolvable.", "logic": "\nFanlike(abra)\nPeopled(abra)\nAimless(abra)\nBavarian(abra)\nFanlike(kippie)\nPeopled(kippie)\nFront(kippie)\nAimless(kippie)\nBaptized(kippie)\nBavarian(kippie)\nforall x (Bavarian(x) -> Insolvable(x))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Bavarian(x) -> Baptized(x))\nforall x (Insolvable(x) and Bavarian(x) -> Peopled(x))\n\nnot Insolvable(abra)\n\nBavarian(abra) and forall x (Bavarian(x) -> Insolvable(x)) -> therefore Insolvable(abra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Zary is comical. Zary is anaemic. Zary is alkaloidal. Zary is lavender. Amory is comical. Amory is anaemic. Amory is antithetic. Amory is alkaloidal. Amory is concentric. Amory is lavender. White people are sweetheart. Rough, lavender people are concentric. All sweetheart, lavender people are anaemic. Zary is concentric.", "logic": "\nComical(zary)\nAnaemic(zary)\nAlkaloidal(zary)\nLavender(zary)\nComical(amory)\nAnaemic(amory)\nAntithetic(amory)\nAlkaloidal(amory)\nConcentric(amory)\nLavender(amory)\nforall x (Lavender(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) and Lavender(x) -> Concentric(x))\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) and Lavender(x) -> Anaemic(x))\n\nConcentric(zary)\n\nLavender(zary) and forall x (Lavender(x) -> Sweetheart(x)) -> therefore Sweetheart(zary) Sweetheart(zary) and Lavender(zary) and forall x (Sweetheart(x) and Lavender(x) -> Concentric(x)) -> therefore Concentric(zary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Yvette is continuing. Yvette is fibrillose. Yvette is unobserved. Yvette is abreast. Joaquin is continuing. Joaquin is fibrillose. Joaquin is vesicatory. Joaquin is unobserved. Joaquin is unversed. Joaquin is abreast. White people are vaccinated. Rough, abreast people are unversed. All vaccinated, abreast people are fibrillose. Yvette is not unversed.", "logic": "\nContinuing(yvette)\nFibrillose(yvette)\nUnobserved(yvette)\nAbreast(yvette)\nContinuing(joaquin)\nFibrillose(joaquin)\nVesicatory(joaquin)\nUnobserved(joaquin)\nUnversed(joaquin)\nAbreast(joaquin)\nforall x (Abreast(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Abreast(x) -> Unversed(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Abreast(x) -> Fibrillose(x))\n\nnot Unversed(yvette)\n\nAbreast(yvette) and forall x (Abreast(x) -> Vaccinated(x)) -> therefore Vaccinated(yvette) Vaccinated(yvette) and Abreast(yvette) and forall x (Vaccinated(x) and Abreast(x) -> Unversed(x)) -> therefore Unversed(yvette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-343"} {"premises": "Marybelle is tart. Lyn is cambrian. Darline is alphabetic. All cambrian things are tart. Red, laggard things are not tart. If something is prosperous then it is alphabetic. Young things are alphabetic. If something is sudden then it is not cambrian. Nice things are prosperous. Darline is alphabetic.", "logic": "\nTart(marybelle)\nCambrian(lyn)\nAlphabetic(darline)\nforall x (Cambrian(x) -> Tart(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) and Laggard(x) -> not Tart(x))\nforall x (Prosperous(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Sudden(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Sudden(x) -> not Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Tart(x) -> Prosperous(x))\n\nAlphabetic(darline)\n\ntherefore Alphabetic(darline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Tabina is caffeinic. Valry is sour. Yovonnda is crisp. All sour things are caffeinic. Red, thrifty things are not caffeinic. If something is uncreased then it is crisp. Young things are crisp. If something is fungicidal then it is not sour. Nice things are uncreased. Tabina is not caffeinic.", "logic": "\nCaffeinic(tabina)\nSour(valry)\nCrisp(yovonnda)\nforall x (Sour(x) -> Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Sour(x) and Thrifty(x) -> not Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Uncreased(x) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Fungicidal(x) -> not Sour(x))\nforall x (Caffeinic(x) -> Uncreased(x))\n\nnot Caffeinic(tabina)\n\ntherefore Caffeinic(tabina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Aldwin is harnessed. Stanwood is meaningful. Konrad is ankylotic. All meaningful things are harnessed. Red, sunrise things are not harnessed. If something is unverified then it is ankylotic. Young things are ankylotic. If something is adsorbable then it is not meaningful. Nice things are unverified. Aldwin is unverified.", "logic": "\nHarnessed(aldwin)\nMeaningful(stanwood)\nAnkylotic(konrad)\nforall x (Meaningful(x) -> Harnessed(x))\nforall x (Meaningful(x) and Sunrise(x) -> not Harnessed(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) -> not Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Harnessed(x) -> Unverified(x))\n\nUnverified(aldwin)\n\nHarnessed(aldwin) and forall x (Harnessed(x) -> Unverified(x)) -> therefore Unverified(aldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Anson is threescore. Nola is mesophytic. Adiana is modifiable. All mesophytic things are threescore. Red, chadian things are not threescore. If something is astute then it is modifiable. Young things are modifiable. If something is forward then it is not mesophytic. Nice things are astute. Nola is not threescore.", "logic": "\nThreescore(anson)\nMesophytic(nola)\nModifiable(adiana)\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) -> Threescore(x))\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) and Chadian(x) -> not Threescore(x))\nforall x (Astute(x) -> Modifiable(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) -> Modifiable(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) -> not Mesophytic(x))\nforall x (Threescore(x) -> Astute(x))\n\nnot Threescore(nola)\n\nMesophytic(nola) and forall x (Mesophytic(x) -> Threescore(x)) -> therefore Threescore(nola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Monika is onside. Jillene is insatiable. Tove is abounding. All insatiable things are onside. Red, ribless things are not onside. If something is chylous then it is abounding. Young things are abounding. If something is swart then it is not insatiable. Nice things are chylous. Monika is abounding.", "logic": "\nOnside(monika)\nInsatiable(jillene)\nAbounding(tove)\nforall x (Insatiable(x) -> Onside(x))\nforall x (Insatiable(x) and Ribless(x) -> not Onside(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Abounding(x))\nforall x (Swart(x) -> Abounding(x))\nforall x (Swart(x) -> not Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Onside(x) -> Chylous(x))\n\nAbounding(monika)\n\nOnside(monika) and forall x (Onside(x) -> Chylous(x)) -> therefore Chylous(monika) Chylous(monika) and forall x (Chylous(x) -> Abounding(x)) -> therefore Abounding(monika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Westley is copesettic. Philbert is hastate. Hasty is benefic. All hastate things are copesettic. Red, unhewn things are not copesettic. If something is dejected then it is benefic. Young things are benefic. If something is codified then it is not hastate. Nice things are dejected. Westley is not benefic.", "logic": "\nCopesettic(westley)\nHastate(philbert)\nBenefic(hasty)\nforall x (Hastate(x) -> Copesettic(x))\nforall x (Hastate(x) and Unhewn(x) -> not Copesettic(x))\nforall x (Dejected(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> Benefic(x))\nforall x (Codified(x) -> not Hastate(x))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Dejected(x))\n\nnot Benefic(westley)\n\nCopesettic(westley) and forall x (Copesettic(x) -> Dejected(x)) -> therefore Dejected(westley) Dejected(westley) and forall x (Dejected(x) -> Benefic(x)) -> therefore Benefic(westley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Swen is ascensive. Osborn is bally. Niccolo is drilled. All bally things are ascensive. Red, allargando things are not ascensive. If something is apetalous then it is drilled. Young things are drilled. If something is sabahan then it is not bally. Nice things are apetalous. Osborn is drilled.", "logic": "\nAscensive(swen)\nBally(osborn)\nDrilled(niccolo)\nforall x (Bally(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Bally(x) and Allargando(x) -> not Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Apetalous(x) -> Drilled(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) -> Drilled(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) -> not Bally(x))\nforall x (Ascensive(x) -> Apetalous(x))\n\nDrilled(osborn)\n\nBally(osborn) and forall x (Bally(x) -> Ascensive(x)) -> therefore Ascensive(osborn) Ascensive(osborn) and forall x (Ascensive(x) -> Apetalous(x)) -> therefore Apetalous(osborn) Apetalous(osborn) and forall x (Apetalous(x) -> Drilled(x)) -> therefore Drilled(osborn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Joly is underived. Trude is baseborn. Annadiane is designing. All baseborn things are underived. Red, ghoulish things are not underived. If something is pinched then it is designing. Young things are designing. If something is misty then it is not baseborn. Nice things are pinched. Trude is not designing.", "logic": "\nUnderived(joly)\nBaseborn(trude)\nDesigning(annadiane)\nforall x (Baseborn(x) -> Underived(x))\nforall x (Baseborn(x) and Ghoulish(x) -> not Underived(x))\nforall x (Pinched(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) -> Designing(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) -> not Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Underived(x) -> Pinched(x))\n\nnot Designing(trude)\n\nBaseborn(trude) and forall x (Baseborn(x) -> Underived(x)) -> therefore Underived(trude) Underived(trude) and forall x (Underived(x) -> Pinched(x)) -> therefore Pinched(trude) Pinched(trude) and forall x (Pinched(x) -> Designing(x)) -> therefore Designing(trude)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Leonardo is wiry. Ashley is artesian. Yankee is catabatic. All artesian things are wiry. Red, myopic things are not wiry. If something is undyed then it is catabatic. Young things are catabatic. If something is dual then it is not artesian. Nice things are undyed. Yankee is not undyed.", "logic": "\nWiry(leonardo)\nArtesian(ashley)\nCatabatic(yankee)\nforall x (Artesian(x) -> Wiry(x))\nforall x (Artesian(x) and Myopic(x) -> not Wiry(x))\nforall x (Undyed(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> not Artesian(x))\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Undyed(x))\n\nnot Undyed(yankee)\n\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Undyed(x)) <- forall x (Artesian(x) -> Wiry(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Otho is disabling. Bonnie is monotypic. Rahal is psychic. All monotypic things are disabling. Red, heartfelt things are not disabling. If something is unfilmed then it is psychic. Young things are psychic. If something is unsleeping then it is not monotypic. Nice things are unfilmed. Rahal is disabling.", "logic": "\nDisabling(otho)\nMonotypic(bonnie)\nPsychic(rahal)\nforall x (Monotypic(x) -> Disabling(x))\nforall x (Monotypic(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> not Disabling(x))\nforall x (Unfilmed(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) -> Psychic(x))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) -> not Monotypic(x))\nforall x (Disabling(x) -> Unfilmed(x))\n\nDisabling(rahal)\n\nforall x (Monotypic(x) -> Disabling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Montague is albitic. Chiquita is mosaic. Henryetta is danceable. All mosaic things are albitic. Red, trying things are not albitic. If something is inertial then it is danceable. Young things are danceable. If something is fruity then it is not mosaic. Nice things are inertial. Montague is not mosaic.", "logic": "\nAlbitic(montague)\nMosaic(chiquita)\nDanceable(henryetta)\nforall x (Mosaic(x) -> Albitic(x))\nforall x (Mosaic(x) and Trying(x) -> not Albitic(x))\nforall x (Inertial(x) -> Danceable(x))\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> Danceable(x))\nforall x (Fruity(x) -> not Mosaic(x))\nforall x (Albitic(x) -> Inertial(x))\n\nnot Mosaic(montague)\n\nnot Mosaic(montague) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Paten is archival. Rebekkah is retractile. Sergeant is delphian. All retractile things are archival. Red, pathless things are not archival. If something is outfitted then it is delphian. Young things are delphian. If something is puranic then it is not retractile. Nice things are outfitted. Rebekkah is rough.", "logic": "\nArchival(paten)\nRetractile(rebekkah)\nDelphian(sergeant)\nforall x (Retractile(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Retractile(x) and Pathless(x) -> not Archival(x))\nforall x (Outfitted(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Puranic(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Puranic(x) -> not Retractile(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) -> Outfitted(x))\n\nRough(rebekkah)\n\nRough(rebekkah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Francine is relevant. Beitris is separative. Remus is ecstatic. All separative things are relevant. Red, bicuspid things are not relevant. If something is apivorous then it is ecstatic. Young things are ecstatic. If something is perverse then it is not separative. Nice things are apivorous. Beitris is not perverse.", "logic": "\nRelevant(francine)\nSeparative(beitris)\nEcstatic(remus)\nforall x (Separative(x) -> Relevant(x))\nforall x (Separative(x) and Bicuspid(x) -> not Relevant(x))\nforall x (Apivorous(x) -> Ecstatic(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> Ecstatic(x))\nforall x (Perverse(x) -> not Separative(x))\nforall x (Relevant(x) -> Apivorous(x))\n\nnot Perverse(beitris)\n\nnot Perverse(beitris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Marcellus is dyadic. Nina is orderly. Birgit is partible. All orderly things are dyadic. Red, notifiable things are not dyadic. If something is stale then it is partible. Young things are partible. If something is pubertal then it is not orderly. Nice things are stale. Birgit is notifiable.", "logic": "\nDyadic(marcellus)\nOrderly(nina)\nPartible(birgit)\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Dyadic(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) and Notifiable(x) -> not Dyadic(x))\nforall x (Stale(x) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) -> Partible(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) -> not Orderly(x))\nforall x (Dyadic(x) -> Stale(x))\n\nNotifiable(birgit)\n\nNotifiable(birgit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Electra is parve. Janith is saving. Lukas is supportive. All saving things are parve. Red, familiar things are not parve. If something is midweekly then it is supportive. Young things are supportive. If something is taupe then it is not saving. Nice things are midweekly. Electra is not rough.", "logic": "\nParve(electra)\nSaving(janith)\nSupportive(lukas)\nforall x (Saving(x) -> Parve(x))\nforall x (Saving(x) and Familiar(x) -> not Parve(x))\nforall x (Midweekly(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> not Saving(x))\nforall x (Parve(x) -> Midweekly(x))\n\nnot Rough(electra)\n\nnot Rough(electra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Lynde is nonracist. Avis is disposed. Jeana is trackless. All disposed things are nonracist. Red, comestible things are not nonracist. If something is awed then it is trackless. Young things are trackless. If something is aground then it is not disposed. Nice things are awed. Lynde is aground.", "logic": "\nNonracist(lynde)\nDisposed(avis)\nTrackless(jeana)\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> Nonracist(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Comestible(x) -> not Nonracist(x))\nforall x (Awed(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Aground(x) -> Trackless(x))\nforall x (Aground(x) -> not Disposed(x))\nforall x (Nonracist(x) -> Awed(x))\n\nAground(lynde)\n\nAground(lynde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "Chet is dowdy. Chet is calendered. Wendi is dowdy. Wendi is indigenous. Wendi is xxvi. Wendi is calendered. Cresa is indigenous. Cresa is demotic. Cresa is calendered. Vivi is calendered. If Chet is dowdy then Chet is indigenous. If something is dowdy and calendered then it is xxvi. Kind things are xxvi. If Cresa is calendered and Cresa is demotic then Cresa is indigenous. If something is demotic then it is dowdy. Red things are indigenous. If something is dowdy then it is calendered. Cold, calendered things are demotic. Vivi is calendered.", "logic": "\nDowdy(chet)\nCalendered(chet)\nDowdy(wendi)\nIndigenous(wendi)\nXxvi(wendi)\nCalendered(wendi)\nIndigenous(cresa)\nDemotic(cresa)\nCalendered(cresa)\nCalendered(vivi)\nDowdy(chet) -> Indigenous(chet)\nforall x (Dowdy(x) and Calendered(x) -> Xxvi(x))\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Xxvi(x))\nCalendered(cresa) and Demotic(cresa) -> Indigenous(cresa)\nforall x (Demotic(x) -> Dowdy(x))\nforall x (Calendered(x) -> Indigenous(x))\nforall x (Dowdy(x) -> Calendered(x))\nforall x (Indigenous(x) and Calendered(x) -> Demotic(x))\n\nCalendered(vivi)\n\ntherefore Calendered(vivi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Joye is moral. Joye is sneezy. Natassia is moral. Natassia is unrealized. Natassia is collusive. Natassia is sneezy. Lucille is unrealized. Lucille is thenar. Lucille is sneezy. Kermie is sneezy. If Joye is moral then Joye is unrealized. If something is moral and sneezy then it is collusive. Kind things are collusive. If Lucille is sneezy and Lucille is thenar then Lucille is unrealized. If something is thenar then it is moral. Red things are unrealized. If something is moral then it is sneezy. Cold, sneezy things are thenar. Natassia is not sneezy.", "logic": "\nMoral(joye)\nSneezy(joye)\nMoral(natassia)\nUnrealized(natassia)\nCollusive(natassia)\nSneezy(natassia)\nUnrealized(lucille)\nThenar(lucille)\nSneezy(lucille)\nSneezy(kermie)\nMoral(joye) -> Unrealized(joye)\nforall x (Moral(x) and Sneezy(x) -> Collusive(x))\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Collusive(x))\nSneezy(lucille) and Thenar(lucille) -> Unrealized(lucille)\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Moral(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Unrealized(x))\nforall x (Moral(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Unrealized(x) and Sneezy(x) -> Thenar(x))\n\nnot Sneezy(natassia)\n\ntherefore Sneezy(natassia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Roberto is comic. Roberto is javan. Isaac is comic. Isaac is ethnical. Isaac is jamesian. Isaac is javan. Elwina is ethnical. Elwina is unsworn. Elwina is javan. Hulda is javan. If Roberto is comic then Roberto is ethnical. If something is comic and javan then it is jamesian. Kind things are jamesian. If Elwina is javan and Elwina is unsworn then Elwina is ethnical. If something is unsworn then it is comic. Red things are ethnical. If something is comic then it is javan. Cold, javan things are unsworn. Isaac is unsworn.", "logic": "\nComic(roberto)\nJavan(roberto)\nComic(isaac)\nEthnical(isaac)\nJamesian(isaac)\nJavan(isaac)\nEthnical(elwina)\nUnsworn(elwina)\nJavan(elwina)\nJavan(hulda)\nComic(roberto) -> Ethnical(roberto)\nforall x (Comic(x) and Javan(x) -> Jamesian(x))\nforall x (Unsworn(x) -> Jamesian(x))\nJavan(elwina) and Unsworn(elwina) -> Ethnical(elwina)\nforall x (Unsworn(x) -> Comic(x))\nforall x (Javan(x) -> Ethnical(x))\nforall x (Comic(x) -> Javan(x))\nforall x (Ethnical(x) and Javan(x) -> Unsworn(x))\n\nUnsworn(isaac)\n\nEthnical(isaac) and Javan(isaac) and forall x (Ethnical(x) and Javan(x) -> Unsworn(x)) -> therefore Unsworn(isaac)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Giles is subsequent. Giles is carpeted. Hodge is subsequent. Hodge is gummed. Hodge is curled. Hodge is carpeted. Jess is gummed. Jess is deflective. Jess is carpeted. Dierdre is carpeted. If Giles is subsequent then Giles is gummed. If something is subsequent and carpeted then it is curled. Kind things are curled. If Jess is carpeted and Jess is deflective then Jess is gummed. If something is deflective then it is subsequent. Red things are gummed. If something is subsequent then it is carpeted. Cold, carpeted things are deflective. Jess is not subsequent.", "logic": "\nSubsequent(giles)\nCarpeted(giles)\nSubsequent(hodge)\nGummed(hodge)\nCurled(hodge)\nCarpeted(hodge)\nGummed(jess)\nDeflective(jess)\nCarpeted(jess)\nCarpeted(dierdre)\nSubsequent(giles) -> Gummed(giles)\nforall x (Subsequent(x) and Carpeted(x) -> Curled(x))\nforall x (Deflective(x) -> Curled(x))\nCarpeted(jess) and Deflective(jess) -> Gummed(jess)\nforall x (Deflective(x) -> Subsequent(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Gummed(x))\nforall x (Subsequent(x) -> Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) and Carpeted(x) -> Deflective(x))\n\nnot Subsequent(jess)\n\nDeflective(jess) and forall x (Deflective(x) -> Subsequent(x)) -> therefore Subsequent(jess)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Philip is fantastic. Philip is doped. Gilburt is fantastic. Gilburt is shaky. Gilburt is narrative. Gilburt is doped. Jana is shaky. Jana is thawed. Jana is doped. Thorsten is doped. If Philip is fantastic then Philip is shaky. If something is fantastic and doped then it is narrative. Kind things are narrative. If Jana is doped and Jana is thawed then Jana is shaky. If something is thawed then it is fantastic. Red things are shaky. If something is fantastic then it is doped. Cold, doped things are thawed. Philip is thawed.", "logic": "\nFantastic(philip)\nDoped(philip)\nFantastic(gilburt)\nShaky(gilburt)\nNarrative(gilburt)\nDoped(gilburt)\nShaky(jana)\nThawed(jana)\nDoped(jana)\nDoped(thorsten)\nFantastic(philip) -> Shaky(philip)\nforall x (Fantastic(x) and Doped(x) -> Narrative(x))\nforall x (Thawed(x) -> Narrative(x))\nDoped(jana) and Thawed(jana) -> Shaky(jana)\nforall x (Thawed(x) -> Fantastic(x))\nforall x (Doped(x) -> Shaky(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) -> Doped(x))\nforall x (Shaky(x) and Doped(x) -> Thawed(x))\n\nThawed(philip)\n\nFantastic(philip) and Fantastic(philip) -> Shaky(philip) -> therefore Shaky(philip) Shaky(philip) and Doped(philip) and forall x (Shaky(x) and Doped(x) -> Thawed(x)) -> therefore Thawed(philip)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Jeni is leaved. Jeni is pondering. Maxine is leaved. Maxine is reciprocal. Maxine is nonrandom. Maxine is pondering. Jackelyn is reciprocal. Jackelyn is sneaky. Jackelyn is pondering. Elsinore is pondering. If Jeni is leaved then Jeni is reciprocal. If something is leaved and pondering then it is nonrandom. Kind things are nonrandom. If Jackelyn is pondering and Jackelyn is sneaky then Jackelyn is reciprocal. If something is sneaky then it is leaved. Red things are reciprocal. If something is leaved then it is pondering. Cold, pondering things are sneaky. Jeni is not sneaky.", "logic": "\nLeaved(jeni)\nPondering(jeni)\nLeaved(maxine)\nReciprocal(maxine)\nNonrandom(maxine)\nPondering(maxine)\nReciprocal(jackelyn)\nSneaky(jackelyn)\nPondering(jackelyn)\nPondering(elsinore)\nLeaved(jeni) -> Reciprocal(jeni)\nforall x (Leaved(x) and Pondering(x) -> Nonrandom(x))\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Nonrandom(x))\nPondering(jackelyn) and Sneaky(jackelyn) -> Reciprocal(jackelyn)\nforall x (Sneaky(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Pondering(x) -> Reciprocal(x))\nforall x (Leaved(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Reciprocal(x) and Pondering(x) -> Sneaky(x))\n\nnot Sneaky(jeni)\n\nLeaved(jeni) and Leaved(jeni) -> Reciprocal(jeni) -> therefore Reciprocal(jeni) Reciprocal(jeni) and Pondering(jeni) and forall x (Reciprocal(x) and Pondering(x) -> Sneaky(x)) -> therefore Sneaky(jeni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Kanya is swell. Kanya is coalescing. Francis is swell. Francis is direful. Francis is alated. Francis is coalescing. Wilie is direful. Wilie is worshipful. Wilie is coalescing. Leonhard is coalescing. If Kanya is swell then Kanya is direful. If something is swell and coalescing then it is alated. Kind things are alated. If Wilie is coalescing and Wilie is worshipful then Wilie is direful. If something is worshipful then it is swell. Red things are direful. If something is swell then it is coalescing. Cold, coalescing things are worshipful. Leonhard is swell.", "logic": "\nSwell(kanya)\nCoalescing(kanya)\nSwell(francis)\nDireful(francis)\nAlated(francis)\nCoalescing(francis)\nDireful(wilie)\nWorshipful(wilie)\nCoalescing(wilie)\nCoalescing(leonhard)\nSwell(kanya) -> Direful(kanya)\nforall x (Swell(x) and Coalescing(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Alated(x))\nCoalescing(wilie) and Worshipful(wilie) -> Direful(wilie)\nforall x (Worshipful(x) -> Swell(x))\nforall x (Coalescing(x) -> Direful(x))\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Coalescing(x))\nforall x (Direful(x) and Coalescing(x) -> Worshipful(x))\n\nSwell(leonhard)\n\nCoalescing(leonhard) and forall x (Coalescing(x) -> Direful(x)) -> therefore Direful(leonhard) Direful(leonhard) and Coalescing(leonhard) and forall x (Direful(x) and Coalescing(x) -> Worshipful(x)) -> therefore Worshipful(leonhard) Worshipful(leonhard) and forall x (Worshipful(x) -> Swell(x)) -> therefore Swell(leonhard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Miguelita is aleuronic. Miguelita is unerring. Bertram is aleuronic. Bertram is civic. Bertram is deep. Bertram is unerring. Warde is civic. Warde is dextrorse. Warde is unerring. Margot is unerring. If Miguelita is aleuronic then Miguelita is civic. If something is aleuronic and unerring then it is deep. Kind things are deep. If Warde is unerring and Warde is dextrorse then Warde is civic. If something is dextrorse then it is aleuronic. Red things are civic. If something is aleuronic then it is unerring. Cold, unerring things are dextrorse. Margot is not deep.", "logic": "\nAleuronic(miguelita)\nUnerring(miguelita)\nAleuronic(bertram)\nCivic(bertram)\nDeep(bertram)\nUnerring(bertram)\nCivic(warde)\nDextrorse(warde)\nUnerring(warde)\nUnerring(margot)\nAleuronic(miguelita) -> Civic(miguelita)\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Unerring(x) -> Deep(x))\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Deep(x))\nUnerring(warde) and Dextrorse(warde) -> Civic(warde)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nforall x (Unerring(x) -> Civic(x))\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) -> Unerring(x))\nforall x (Civic(x) and Unerring(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\n\nnot Deep(margot)\n\nUnerring(margot) and forall x (Unerring(x) -> Civic(x)) -> therefore Civic(margot) Civic(margot) and Unerring(margot) and forall x (Civic(x) and Unerring(x) -> Dextrorse(x)) -> therefore Dextrorse(margot) Dextrorse(margot) and forall x (Dextrorse(x) -> Deep(x)) -> therefore Deep(margot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Harmonia is stentorian. Harmonia is eloquent. Arlina is stentorian. Arlina is recessed. Arlina is like. Arlina is eloquent. Binky is recessed. Binky is soundable. Binky is eloquent. Allan is eloquent. If Harmonia is stentorian then Harmonia is recessed. If something is stentorian and eloquent then it is like. Kind things are like. If Binky is eloquent and Binky is soundable then Binky is recessed. If something is soundable then it is stentorian. Red things are recessed. If something is stentorian then it is eloquent. Cold, eloquent things are soundable. Harmonia is not nice.", "logic": "\nStentorian(harmonia)\nEloquent(harmonia)\nStentorian(arlina)\nRecessed(arlina)\nLike(arlina)\nEloquent(arlina)\nRecessed(binky)\nSoundable(binky)\nEloquent(binky)\nEloquent(allan)\nStentorian(harmonia) -> Recessed(harmonia)\nforall x (Stentorian(x) and Eloquent(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Soundable(x) -> Like(x))\nEloquent(binky) and Soundable(binky) -> Recessed(binky)\nforall x (Soundable(x) -> Stentorian(x))\nforall x (Eloquent(x) -> Recessed(x))\nforall x (Stentorian(x) -> Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Recessed(x) and Eloquent(x) -> Soundable(x))\n\nnot Nice(harmonia)\n\nnot Nice(harmonia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Dode is aligned. Dode is pleasant. Obadias is aligned. Obadias is verifying. Obadias is psychical. Obadias is pleasant. Towney is verifying. Towney is dissimilar. Towney is pleasant. Olympie is pleasant. If Dode is aligned then Dode is verifying. If something is aligned and pleasant then it is psychical. Kind things are psychical. If Towney is pleasant and Towney is dissimilar then Towney is verifying. If something is dissimilar then it is aligned. Red things are verifying. If something is aligned then it is pleasant. Cold, pleasant things are dissimilar. Towney is nice.", "logic": "\nAligned(dode)\nPleasant(dode)\nAligned(obadias)\nVerifying(obadias)\nPsychical(obadias)\nPleasant(obadias)\nVerifying(towney)\nDissimilar(towney)\nPleasant(towney)\nPleasant(olympie)\nAligned(dode) -> Verifying(dode)\nforall x (Aligned(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Psychical(x))\nforall x (Dissimilar(x) -> Psychical(x))\nPleasant(towney) and Dissimilar(towney) -> Verifying(towney)\nforall x (Dissimilar(x) -> Aligned(x))\nforall x (Pleasant(x) -> Verifying(x))\nforall x (Aligned(x) -> Pleasant(x))\nforall x (Verifying(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Dissimilar(x))\n\nNice(towney)\n\nNice(towney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Germana is nidifugous. Germana is tight. Heda is nidifugous. Heda is synaptic. Heda is sounding. Heda is tight. Oliy is synaptic. Oliy is parochial. Oliy is tight. Kaia is tight. If Germana is nidifugous then Germana is synaptic. If something is nidifugous and tight then it is sounding. Kind things are sounding. If Oliy is tight and Oliy is parochial then Oliy is synaptic. If something is parochial then it is nidifugous. Red things are synaptic. If something is nidifugous then it is tight. Cold, tight things are parochial. Oliy is not round.", "logic": "\nNidifugous(germana)\nTight(germana)\nNidifugous(heda)\nSynaptic(heda)\nSounding(heda)\nTight(heda)\nSynaptic(oliy)\nParochial(oliy)\nTight(oliy)\nTight(kaia)\nNidifugous(germana) -> Synaptic(germana)\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) and Tight(x) -> Sounding(x))\nforall x (Parochial(x) -> Sounding(x))\nTight(oliy) and Parochial(oliy) -> Synaptic(oliy)\nforall x (Parochial(x) -> Nidifugous(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Synaptic(x))\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) -> Tight(x))\nforall x (Synaptic(x) and Tight(x) -> Parochial(x))\n\nnot Round(oliy)\n\nnot Round(oliy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Matteo is ambient. Matteo is antifungal. Randall is ambient. Randall is unpledged. Randall is rabid. Randall is antifungal. Robbert is unpledged. Robbert is comely. Robbert is antifungal. George is antifungal. If Matteo is ambient then Matteo is unpledged. If something is ambient and antifungal then it is rabid. Kind things are rabid. If Robbert is antifungal and Robbert is comely then Robbert is unpledged. If something is comely then it is ambient. Red things are unpledged. If something is ambient then it is antifungal. Cold, antifungal things are comely. George is nice.", "logic": "\nAmbient(matteo)\nAntifungal(matteo)\nAmbient(randall)\nUnpledged(randall)\nRabid(randall)\nAntifungal(randall)\nUnpledged(robbert)\nComely(robbert)\nAntifungal(robbert)\nAntifungal(george)\nAmbient(matteo) -> Unpledged(matteo)\nforall x (Ambient(x) and Antifungal(x) -> Rabid(x))\nforall x (Comely(x) -> Rabid(x))\nAntifungal(robbert) and Comely(robbert) -> Unpledged(robbert)\nforall x (Comely(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Antifungal(x) -> Unpledged(x))\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> Antifungal(x))\nforall x (Unpledged(x) and Antifungal(x) -> Comely(x))\n\nNice(george)\n\nNice(george) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Lisa is alar. Lisa is debonaire. Wesley is alar. Wesley is citywide. Wesley is afrikaner. Wesley is debonaire. Hamel is citywide. Hamel is parvenu. Hamel is debonaire. Libbi is debonaire. If Lisa is alar then Lisa is citywide. If something is alar and debonaire then it is afrikaner. Kind things are afrikaner. If Hamel is debonaire and Hamel is parvenu then Hamel is citywide. If something is parvenu then it is alar. Red things are citywide. If something is alar then it is debonaire. Cold, debonaire things are parvenu. Libbi is not round.", "logic": "\nAlar(lisa)\nDebonaire(lisa)\nAlar(wesley)\nCitywide(wesley)\nAfrikaner(wesley)\nDebonaire(wesley)\nCitywide(hamel)\nParvenu(hamel)\nDebonaire(hamel)\nDebonaire(libbi)\nAlar(lisa) -> Citywide(lisa)\nforall x (Alar(x) and Debonaire(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nDebonaire(hamel) and Parvenu(hamel) -> Citywide(hamel)\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Alar(x))\nforall x (Debonaire(x) -> Citywide(x))\nforall x (Alar(x) -> Debonaire(x))\nforall x (Citywide(x) and Debonaire(x) -> Parvenu(x))\n\nnot Round(libbi)\n\nnot Round(libbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Roxine is unaware. Roxine is inane. Rhona is unaware. Rhona is nigerian. Rhona is vegetative. Rhona is inane. Sergio is nigerian. Sergio is ageless. Sergio is inane. Tobi is inane. If Roxine is unaware then Roxine is nigerian. If something is unaware and inane then it is vegetative. Kind things are vegetative. If Sergio is inane and Sergio is ageless then Sergio is nigerian. If something is ageless then it is unaware. Red things are nigerian. If something is unaware then it is inane. Cold, inane things are ageless. Rhona is round.", "logic": "\nUnaware(roxine)\nInane(roxine)\nUnaware(rhona)\nNigerian(rhona)\nVegetative(rhona)\nInane(rhona)\nNigerian(sergio)\nAgeless(sergio)\nInane(sergio)\nInane(tobi)\nUnaware(roxine) -> Nigerian(roxine)\nforall x (Unaware(x) and Inane(x) -> Vegetative(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Vegetative(x))\nInane(sergio) and Ageless(sergio) -> Nigerian(sergio)\nforall x (Ageless(x) -> Unaware(x))\nforall x (Inane(x) -> Nigerian(x))\nforall x (Unaware(x) -> Inane(x))\nforall x (Nigerian(x) and Inane(x) -> Ageless(x))\n\nRound(rhona)\n\nRound(rhona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Erhart is purgative. Erhart is uruguayan. Ardelis is purgative. Ardelis is wanton. Ardelis is nimble. Ardelis is uruguayan. Theresita is wanton. Theresita is gradual. Theresita is uruguayan. Terry is uruguayan. If Erhart is purgative then Erhart is wanton. If something is purgative and uruguayan then it is nimble. Kind things are nimble. If Theresita is uruguayan and Theresita is gradual then Theresita is wanton. If something is gradual then it is purgative. Red things are wanton. If something is purgative then it is uruguayan. Cold, uruguayan things are gradual. Erhart is not round.", "logic": "\nPurgative(erhart)\nUruguayan(erhart)\nPurgative(ardelis)\nWanton(ardelis)\nNimble(ardelis)\nUruguayan(ardelis)\nWanton(theresita)\nGradual(theresita)\nUruguayan(theresita)\nUruguayan(terry)\nPurgative(erhart) -> Wanton(erhart)\nforall x (Purgative(x) and Uruguayan(x) -> Nimble(x))\nforall x (Gradual(x) -> Nimble(x))\nUruguayan(theresita) and Gradual(theresita) -> Wanton(theresita)\nforall x (Gradual(x) -> Purgative(x))\nforall x (Uruguayan(x) -> Wanton(x))\nforall x (Purgative(x) -> Uruguayan(x))\nforall x (Wanton(x) and Uruguayan(x) -> Gradual(x))\n\nnot Round(erhart)\n\nnot Round(erhart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Electra is cresson. Electra is guinean. Ramsay is cresson. Ramsay is afferent. Ramsay is untethered. Ramsay is guinean. Salome is afferent. Salome is mechanised. Salome is guinean. Reid is guinean. If Electra is cresson then Electra is afferent. If something is cresson and guinean then it is untethered. Kind things are untethered. If Salome is guinean and Salome is mechanised then Salome is afferent. If something is mechanised then it is cresson. Red things are afferent. If something is cresson then it is guinean. Cold, guinean things are mechanised. Ramsay is nice.", "logic": "\nCresson(electra)\nGuinean(electra)\nCresson(ramsay)\nAfferent(ramsay)\nUntethered(ramsay)\nGuinean(ramsay)\nAfferent(salome)\nMechanised(salome)\nGuinean(salome)\nGuinean(reid)\nCresson(electra) -> Afferent(electra)\nforall x (Cresson(x) and Guinean(x) -> Untethered(x))\nforall x (Mechanised(x) -> Untethered(x))\nGuinean(salome) and Mechanised(salome) -> Afferent(salome)\nforall x (Mechanised(x) -> Cresson(x))\nforall x (Guinean(x) -> Afferent(x))\nforall x (Cresson(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Afferent(x) and Guinean(x) -> Mechanised(x))\n\nNice(ramsay)\n\nNice(ramsay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-277"} {"premises": "Cassy is calced. Valida is unburied. Derrick is begrimed. Flinn is calced. All celebrated, unburied people are illegible. If someone is unburied then they are illegible. Blue people are allied. If Derrick is unburied and Derrick is not begrimed then Derrick is not calced. All calced people are not celebrated. If Derrick is illegible then Derrick is not nourished. If someone is begrimed and allied then they are unburied. If someone is begrimed and not unburied then they are nourished. Derrick is begrimed.", "logic": "\nCalced(cassy)\nUnburied(valida)\nBegrimed(derrick)\nCalced(flinn)\nforall x (Celebrated(x) and Unburied(x) -> Illegible(x))\nforall x (Unburied(x) -> Illegible(x))\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> Allied(x))\nUnburied(derrick) and not Begrimed(derrick) -> not Calced(derrick)\nforall x (Calced(x) -> not Celebrated(x))\nIllegible(derrick) -> not Nourished(derrick)\nforall x (Begrimed(x) and Allied(x) -> Unburied(x))\nforall x (Begrimed(x) and not Unburied(x) -> Nourished(x))\n\nBegrimed(derrick)\n\ntherefore Begrimed(derrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Leonanie is jumpy. Hanford is lifeless. Zacharia is symbiotic. Vonnie is jumpy. All parallel, lifeless people are labile. If someone is lifeless then they are labile. Blue people are unlined. If Zacharia is lifeless and Zacharia is not symbiotic then Zacharia is not jumpy. All jumpy people are not parallel. If Zacharia is labile then Zacharia is not yuman. If someone is symbiotic and unlined then they are lifeless. If someone is symbiotic and not lifeless then they are yuman. Leonanie is not jumpy.", "logic": "\nJumpy(leonanie)\nLifeless(hanford)\nSymbiotic(zacharia)\nJumpy(vonnie)\nforall x (Parallel(x) and Lifeless(x) -> Labile(x))\nforall x (Lifeless(x) -> Labile(x))\nforall x (Labile(x) -> Unlined(x))\nLifeless(zacharia) and not Symbiotic(zacharia) -> not Jumpy(zacharia)\nforall x (Jumpy(x) -> not Parallel(x))\nLabile(zacharia) -> not Yuman(zacharia)\nforall x (Symbiotic(x) and Unlined(x) -> Lifeless(x))\nforall x (Symbiotic(x) and not Lifeless(x) -> Yuman(x))\n\nnot Jumpy(leonanie)\n\ntherefore Jumpy(leonanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Glad is unreliable. Tracie is desirous. Cybal is spoiled. Linnell is unreliable. All increased, desirous people are latter. If someone is desirous then they are latter. Blue people are hydroxy. If Cybal is desirous and Cybal is not spoiled then Cybal is not unreliable. All unreliable people are not increased. If Cybal is latter then Cybal is not neighborly. If someone is spoiled and hydroxy then they are desirous. If someone is spoiled and not desirous then they are neighborly. Linnell is not increased.", "logic": "\nUnreliable(glad)\nDesirous(tracie)\nSpoiled(cybal)\nUnreliable(linnell)\nforall x (Increased(x) and Desirous(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Latter(x) -> Hydroxy(x))\nDesirous(cybal) and not Spoiled(cybal) -> not Unreliable(cybal)\nforall x (Unreliable(x) -> not Increased(x))\nLatter(cybal) -> not Neighborly(cybal)\nforall x (Spoiled(x) and Hydroxy(x) -> Desirous(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) and not Desirous(x) -> Neighborly(x))\n\nnot Increased(linnell)\n\nUnreliable(linnell) and forall x (Unreliable(x) -> not Increased(x)) -> therefore not Increased(linnell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Jeanine is sixty. Nonie is brambly. Chere is paltry. Georgeta is sixty. All adhesive, brambly people are refined. If someone is brambly then they are refined. Blue people are ridiculous. If Chere is brambly and Chere is not paltry then Chere is not sixty. All sixty people are not adhesive. If Chere is refined then Chere is not relative. If someone is paltry and ridiculous then they are brambly. If someone is paltry and not brambly then they are relative. Nonie is not refined.", "logic": "\nSixty(jeanine)\nBrambly(nonie)\nPaltry(chere)\nSixty(georgeta)\nforall x (Adhesive(x) and Brambly(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Brambly(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Refined(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nBrambly(chere) and not Paltry(chere) -> not Sixty(chere)\nforall x (Sixty(x) -> not Adhesive(x))\nRefined(chere) -> not Relative(chere)\nforall x (Paltry(x) and Ridiculous(x) -> Brambly(x))\nforall x (Paltry(x) and not Brambly(x) -> Relative(x))\n\nnot Refined(nonie)\n\nBrambly(nonie) and forall x (Brambly(x) -> Refined(x)) -> therefore Refined(nonie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Zebedee is meticulous. Casie is fragrant. Stanley is volute. Beau is meticulous. All bifacial, fragrant people are faint. If someone is fragrant then they are faint. Blue people are lovesome. If Stanley is fragrant and Stanley is not volute then Stanley is not meticulous. All meticulous people are not bifacial. If Stanley is faint then Stanley is not unsymbolic. If someone is volute and lovesome then they are fragrant. If someone is volute and not fragrant then they are unsymbolic. Casie is lovesome.", "logic": "\nMeticulous(zebedee)\nFragrant(casie)\nVolute(stanley)\nMeticulous(beau)\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Fragrant(x) -> Faint(x))\nforall x (Fragrant(x) -> Faint(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nFragrant(stanley) and not Volute(stanley) -> not Meticulous(stanley)\nforall x (Meticulous(x) -> not Bifacial(x))\nFaint(stanley) -> not Unsymbolic(stanley)\nforall x (Volute(x) and Lovesome(x) -> Fragrant(x))\nforall x (Volute(x) and not Fragrant(x) -> Unsymbolic(x))\n\nLovesome(casie)\n\nFragrant(casie) and forall x (Fragrant(x) -> Faint(x)) -> therefore Faint(casie) Faint(casie) and forall x (Faint(x) -> Lovesome(x)) -> therefore Lovesome(casie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Valaree is unlikable. Raynard is omnipotent. Mirabella is pervasive. Prissie is unlikable. All bilingual, omnipotent people are thankless. If someone is omnipotent then they are thankless. Blue people are hardheaded. If Mirabella is omnipotent and Mirabella is not pervasive then Mirabella is not unlikable. All unlikable people are not bilingual. If Mirabella is thankless then Mirabella is not glial. If someone is pervasive and hardheaded then they are omnipotent. If someone is pervasive and not omnipotent then they are glial. Raynard is not hardheaded.", "logic": "\nUnlikable(valaree)\nOmnipotent(raynard)\nPervasive(mirabella)\nUnlikable(prissie)\nforall x (Bilingual(x) and Omnipotent(x) -> Thankless(x))\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) -> Thankless(x))\nforall x (Thankless(x) -> Hardheaded(x))\nOmnipotent(mirabella) and not Pervasive(mirabella) -> not Unlikable(mirabella)\nforall x (Unlikable(x) -> not Bilingual(x))\nThankless(mirabella) -> not Glial(mirabella)\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and Hardheaded(x) -> Omnipotent(x))\nforall x (Pervasive(x) and not Omnipotent(x) -> Glial(x))\n\nnot Hardheaded(raynard)\n\nOmnipotent(raynard) and forall x (Omnipotent(x) -> Thankless(x)) -> therefore Thankless(raynard) Thankless(raynard) and forall x (Thankless(x) -> Hardheaded(x)) -> therefore Hardheaded(raynard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Everett is disjunct. Idell is gerundial. Jeffrey is tremulous. Ossie is disjunct. All unstinting, gerundial people are anasarcous. If someone is gerundial then they are anasarcous. Blue people are conserved. If Jeffrey is gerundial and Jeffrey is not tremulous then Jeffrey is not disjunct. All disjunct people are not unstinting. If Jeffrey is anasarcous then Jeffrey is not swollen. If someone is tremulous and conserved then they are gerundial. If someone is tremulous and not gerundial then they are swollen. Ossie is not swollen.", "logic": "\nDisjunct(everett)\nGerundial(idell)\nTremulous(jeffrey)\nDisjunct(ossie)\nforall x (Unstinting(x) and Gerundial(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nforall x (Gerundial(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nforall x (Anasarcous(x) -> Conserved(x))\nGerundial(jeffrey) and not Tremulous(jeffrey) -> not Disjunct(jeffrey)\nforall x (Disjunct(x) -> not Unstinting(x))\nAnasarcous(jeffrey) -> not Swollen(jeffrey)\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and Conserved(x) -> Gerundial(x))\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and not Gerundial(x) -> Swollen(x))\n\nnot Swollen(ossie)\n\nforall x (Tremulous(x) and not Gerundial(x) -> Swollen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Gerard is volute. Willow is stroppy. Cappella is motorised. Osbourne is volute. All unframed, stroppy people are aglitter. If someone is stroppy then they are aglitter. Blue people are burnished. If Cappella is stroppy and Cappella is not motorised then Cappella is not volute. All volute people are not unframed. If Cappella is aglitter then Cappella is not actable. If someone is motorised and burnished then they are stroppy. If someone is motorised and not stroppy then they are actable. Gerard is actable.", "logic": "\nVolute(gerard)\nStroppy(willow)\nMotorised(cappella)\nVolute(osbourne)\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Stroppy(x) -> Aglitter(x))\nforall x (Stroppy(x) -> Aglitter(x))\nforall x (Aglitter(x) -> Burnished(x))\nStroppy(cappella) and not Motorised(cappella) -> not Volute(cappella)\nforall x (Volute(x) -> not Unframed(x))\nAglitter(cappella) -> not Actable(cappella)\nforall x (Motorised(x) and Burnished(x) -> Stroppy(x))\nforall x (Motorised(x) and not Stroppy(x) -> Actable(x))\n\nActable(gerard)\n\nforall x (Motorised(x) and not Stroppy(x) -> Actable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Janetta is unloved. Bettine is pyramidic. Billy is agonadal. Swen is unloved. All inherent, pyramidic people are routine. If someone is pyramidic then they are routine. Blue people are bootleg. If Billy is pyramidic and Billy is not agonadal then Billy is not unloved. All unloved people are not inherent. If Billy is routine then Billy is not axillary. If someone is agonadal and bootleg then they are pyramidic. If someone is agonadal and not pyramidic then they are axillary. Janetta is not routine.", "logic": "\nUnloved(janetta)\nPyramidic(bettine)\nAgonadal(billy)\nUnloved(swen)\nforall x (Inherent(x) and Pyramidic(x) -> Routine(x))\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) -> Routine(x))\nforall x (Routine(x) -> Bootleg(x))\nPyramidic(billy) and not Agonadal(billy) -> not Unloved(billy)\nforall x (Unloved(x) -> not Inherent(x))\nRoutine(billy) -> not Axillary(billy)\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and Bootleg(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and not Pyramidic(x) -> Axillary(x))\n\nnot Routine(janetta)\n\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) -> Routine(x)) <- forall x (Agonadal(x) and Bootleg(x) -> Pyramidic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Ford is muted. Ambrosia is backmost. Pru is planate. Norean is muted. All allegretto, backmost people are syllabic. If someone is backmost then they are syllabic. Blue people are clever. If Pru is backmost and Pru is not planate then Pru is not muted. All muted people are not allegretto. If Pru is syllabic then Pru is not flushed. If someone is planate and clever then they are backmost. If someone is planate and not backmost then they are flushed. Ambrosia is allegretto.", "logic": "\nMuted(ford)\nBackmost(ambrosia)\nPlanate(pru)\nMuted(norean)\nforall x (Allegretto(x) and Backmost(x) -> Syllabic(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Syllabic(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> Clever(x))\nBackmost(pru) and not Planate(pru) -> not Muted(pru)\nforall x (Muted(x) -> not Allegretto(x))\nSyllabic(pru) -> not Flushed(pru)\nforall x (Planate(x) and Clever(x) -> Backmost(x))\nforall x (Planate(x) and not Backmost(x) -> Flushed(x))\n\nAllegretto(ambrosia)\n\nAllegretto(ambrosia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Tarra is skinned. Olivette is dislikable. Theodore is broke. Lira is skinned. All moldable, dislikable people are weathered. If someone is dislikable then they are weathered. Blue people are unaltered. If Theodore is dislikable and Theodore is not broke then Theodore is not skinned. All skinned people are not moldable. If Theodore is weathered then Theodore is not curtained. If someone is broke and unaltered then they are dislikable. If someone is broke and not dislikable then they are curtained. Olivette is not skinned.", "logic": "\nSkinned(tarra)\nDislikable(olivette)\nBroke(theodore)\nSkinned(lira)\nforall x (Moldable(x) and Dislikable(x) -> Weathered(x))\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Weathered(x))\nforall x (Weathered(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nDislikable(theodore) and not Broke(theodore) -> not Skinned(theodore)\nforall x (Skinned(x) -> not Moldable(x))\nWeathered(theodore) -> not Curtained(theodore)\nforall x (Broke(x) and Unaltered(x) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Broke(x) and not Dislikable(x) -> Curtained(x))\n\nnot Skinned(olivette)\n\nnot Skinned(olivette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "Clarinda is hebraical. Francois is cadenced. Sammie is xxviii. Bogart is hebraical. All arboreous, cadenced people are cyprinid. If someone is cadenced then they are cyprinid. Blue people are cloudy. If Sammie is cadenced and Sammie is not xxviii then Sammie is not hebraical. All hebraical people are not arboreous. If Sammie is cyprinid then Sammie is not eolithic. If someone is xxviii and cloudy then they are cadenced. If someone is xxviii and not cadenced then they are eolithic. Sammie is arboreous.", "logic": "\nHebraical(clarinda)\nCadenced(francois)\nXxviii(sammie)\nHebraical(bogart)\nforall x (Arboreous(x) and Cadenced(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Cadenced(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nCadenced(sammie) and not Xxviii(sammie) -> not Hebraical(sammie)\nforall x (Hebraical(x) -> not Arboreous(x))\nCyprinid(sammie) -> not Eolithic(sammie)\nforall x (Xxviii(x) and Cloudy(x) -> Cadenced(x))\nforall x (Xxviii(x) and not Cadenced(x) -> Eolithic(x))\n\nArboreous(sammie)\n\nArboreous(sammie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-2215"} {"premises": "The morrie somersault the micaela. The micaela is dried. The tedra somersault the morrie. If something is ascosporic then it yawl the micaela. If something thicken the morrie then the morrie thicken the micaela. The tedra somersault the morrie.", "logic": "\nSomersault(morrie, micaela)\nDried(micaela)\nSomersault(tedra, morrie)\nforall x (Ascosporic(x) -> Yawl(x, micaela))\nforall x (Thicken(x, morrie) -> Thicken(morrie, micaela))\n\nSomersault(tedra, morrie)\n\ntherefore Somersault(tedra, morrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4553"} {"premises": "The sibby globalise the elyn. The elyn is damned. The tedda globalise the sibby. If something is authorised then it illegalize the elyn. If something diet the sibby then the sibby diet the elyn. The tedda does not eat the sibby.", "logic": "\nGlobalise(sibby, elyn)\nDamned(elyn)\nGlobalise(tedda, sibby)\nforall x (Authorised(x) -> Illegalize(x, elyn))\nforall x (Diet(x, sibby) -> Diet(sibby, elyn))\n\nnot Globalise(tedda, sibby)\n\ntherefore Globalise(tedda, sibby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4553"} {"premises": "The wright punch the preston. The preston is evaporable. The everett punch the wright. If something is alphameric then it bleat the preston. If something dust the wright then the wright dust the preston. The wright does not chase the preston.", "logic": "\nPunch(wright, preston)\nEvaporable(preston)\nPunch(everett, wright)\nforall x (Alphameric(x) -> Bleat(x, preston))\nforall x (Dust(x, wright) -> Dust(wright, preston))\n\nnot Dust(wright, preston)\n\nforall x (Dust(x, wright) -> Dust(wright, preston)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4553"} {"premises": "The natalya mortar the ariadne. The ariadne is effluent. The janenna mortar the natalya. If something is quenched then it presume the ariadne. If something firebomb the natalya then the natalya firebomb the ariadne. The janenna is rough.", "logic": "\nMortar(natalya, ariadne)\nEffluent(ariadne)\nMortar(janenna, natalya)\nforall x (Quenched(x) -> Presume(x, ariadne))\nforall x (Firebomb(x, natalya) -> Firebomb(natalya, ariadne))\n\nRough(janenna)\n\nRough(janenna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4553"} {"premises": "Gloriana is mediated. Gloriana is untamed. Gloriana is catalan. Gloriana is epical. Gloriana is greenhouse. Gloriana is cantabile. Gloriana is groveling. All untamed people are catalan. Rough people are cantabile. All greenhouse people are epical. All cantabile, greenhouse people are mediated. If someone is groveling and mediated then they are catalan. All greenhouse, catalan people are mediated. If someone is untamed and greenhouse then they are cantabile. Cold people are groveling. Gloriana is untamed.", "logic": "\nMediated(gloriana)\nUntamed(gloriana)\nCatalan(gloriana)\nEpical(gloriana)\nGreenhouse(gloriana)\nCantabile(gloriana)\nGroveling(gloriana)\nforall x (Untamed(x) -> Catalan(x))\nforall x (Epical(x) -> Cantabile(x))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) -> Epical(x))\nforall x (Cantabile(x) and Greenhouse(x) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Groveling(x) and Mediated(x) -> Catalan(x))\nforall x (Greenhouse(x) and Catalan(x) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Untamed(x) and Greenhouse(x) -> Cantabile(x))\nforall x (Untamed(x) -> Groveling(x))\n\nUntamed(gloriana)\n\ntherefore Untamed(gloriana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-458"} {"premises": "Vivianna is pesky. Vivianna is womanish. Vivianna is scaphoid. Vivianna is bisexual. Vivianna is segmented. Vivianna is heralded. Vivianna is seasonable. All womanish people are scaphoid. Rough people are heralded. All segmented people are bisexual. All heralded, segmented people are pesky. If someone is seasonable and pesky then they are scaphoid. All segmented, scaphoid people are pesky. If someone is womanish and segmented then they are heralded. Cold people are seasonable. Vivianna is not womanish.", "logic": "\nPesky(vivianna)\nWomanish(vivianna)\nScaphoid(vivianna)\nBisexual(vivianna)\nSegmented(vivianna)\nHeralded(vivianna)\nSeasonable(vivianna)\nforall x (Womanish(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) -> Heralded(x))\nforall x (Segmented(x) -> Bisexual(x))\nforall x (Heralded(x) and Segmented(x) -> Pesky(x))\nforall x (Seasonable(x) and Pesky(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Segmented(x) and Scaphoid(x) -> Pesky(x))\nforall x (Womanish(x) and Segmented(x) -> Heralded(x))\nforall x (Womanish(x) -> Seasonable(x))\n\nnot Womanish(vivianna)\n\ntherefore Womanish(vivianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-458"} {"premises": "The maye hyphen the nathanael. The maye fulminate the nathanael. The maye manacle the nathanael. The dirk is epizootic. The dirk is reflective. The dirk manacle the maye. The dirk manacle the nathanael. The nathanael hyphen the dirk. The nathanael fulminate the maye. The nathanael is fitful. The nathanael is epizootic. The nathanael does not see the dirk. If the dirk fulminate the nathanael and the nathanael does not eat the dirk then the dirk fulminate the maye. If the nathanael manacle the dirk and the nathanael is not fitful then the dirk is binuclear. If someone is fitful then they eat the nathanael. If the dirk is binuclear then the dirk fulminate the nathanael. If someone fulminate the nathanael then the nathanael does not see the maye. If someone fulminate the nathanael then they are reflective. If the dirk hyphen the nathanael then the dirk is fitful. If someone hyphen the nathanael and they do not eat the nathanael then they do not eat the maye. The dirk is epizootic.", "logic": "\nHyphen(maye, nathanael)\nFulminate(maye, nathanael)\nManacle(maye, nathanael)\nEpizootic(dirk)\nReflective(dirk)\nManacle(dirk, maye)\nManacle(dirk, nathanael)\nHyphen(nathanael, dirk)\nFulminate(nathanael, maye)\nFitful(nathanael)\nEpizootic(nathanael)\nnot Manacle(nathanael, dirk)\nFulminate(dirk, nathanael) and not Fulminate(nathanael, dirk) -> Fulminate(dirk, maye)\nManacle(nathanael, dirk) and not Fitful(nathanael) -> Binuclear(dirk)\nforall x (Fitful(x) -> Fulminate(x, nathanael))\nBinuclear(dirk) -> Fulminate(dirk, nathanael)\nforall x (Fulminate(x, nathanael) -> not Manacle(nathanael, maye))\nforall x (Fulminate(x, nathanael) -> Reflective(x))\nHyphen(dirk, nathanael) -> Fitful(dirk)\nforall x (Hyphen(x, nathanael) and not Fulminate(x, nathanael) -> not Fulminate(x, maye))\n\nEpizootic(dirk)\n\ntherefore Epizootic(dirk)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The lazaro fuss the clovis. The lazaro canonise the clovis. The lazaro stalinize the clovis. The harriett is gossipy. The harriett is agnate. The harriett stalinize the lazaro. The harriett stalinize the clovis. The clovis fuss the harriett. The clovis canonise the lazaro. The clovis is bimotored. The clovis is gossipy. The clovis does not see the harriett. If the harriett canonise the clovis and the clovis does not eat the harriett then the harriett canonise the lazaro. If the clovis stalinize the harriett and the clovis is not bimotored then the harriett is unabridged. If someone is bimotored then they eat the clovis. If the harriett is unabridged then the harriett canonise the clovis. If someone canonise the clovis then the clovis does not see the lazaro. If someone canonise the clovis then they are agnate. If the harriett fuss the clovis then the harriett is bimotored. If someone fuss the clovis and they do not eat the clovis then they do not eat the lazaro. The lazaro does not eat the clovis.", "logic": "\nFuss(lazaro, clovis)\nCanonise(lazaro, clovis)\nStalinize(lazaro, clovis)\nGossipy(harriett)\nAgnate(harriett)\nStalinize(harriett, lazaro)\nStalinize(harriett, clovis)\nFuss(clovis, harriett)\nCanonise(clovis, lazaro)\nBimotored(clovis)\nGossipy(clovis)\nnot Stalinize(clovis, harriett)\nCanonise(harriett, clovis) and not Canonise(clovis, harriett) -> Canonise(harriett, lazaro)\nStalinize(clovis, harriett) and not Bimotored(clovis) -> Unabridged(harriett)\nforall x (Bimotored(x) -> Canonise(x, clovis))\nUnabridged(harriett) -> Canonise(harriett, clovis)\nforall x (Canonise(x, clovis) -> not Stalinize(clovis, lazaro))\nforall x (Canonise(x, clovis) -> Agnate(x))\nFuss(harriett, clovis) -> Bimotored(harriett)\nforall x (Fuss(x, clovis) and not Canonise(x, clovis) -> not Canonise(x, lazaro))\n\nnot Canonise(lazaro, clovis)\n\ntherefore Canonise(lazaro, clovis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The gertruda bayonet the lydie. The gertruda libel the lydie. The gertruda broaden the lydie. The danni is fusiform. The danni is stoppable. The danni broaden the gertruda. The danni broaden the lydie. The lydie bayonet the danni. The lydie libel the gertruda. The lydie is bursiform. The lydie is fusiform. The lydie does not see the danni. If the danni libel the lydie and the lydie does not eat the danni then the danni libel the gertruda. If the lydie broaden the danni and the lydie is not bursiform then the danni is aculeate. If someone is bursiform then they eat the lydie. If the danni is aculeate then the danni libel the lydie. If someone libel the lydie then the lydie does not see the gertruda. If someone libel the lydie then they are stoppable. If the danni bayonet the lydie then the danni is bursiform. If someone bayonet the lydie and they do not eat the lydie then they do not eat the gertruda. The gertruda is stoppable.", "logic": "\nBayonet(gertruda, lydie)\nLibel(gertruda, lydie)\nBroaden(gertruda, lydie)\nFusiform(danni)\nStoppable(danni)\nBroaden(danni, gertruda)\nBroaden(danni, lydie)\nBayonet(lydie, danni)\nLibel(lydie, gertruda)\nBursiform(lydie)\nFusiform(lydie)\nnot Broaden(lydie, danni)\nLibel(danni, lydie) and not Libel(lydie, danni) -> Libel(danni, gertruda)\nBroaden(lydie, danni) and not Bursiform(lydie) -> Aculeate(danni)\nforall x (Bursiform(x) -> Libel(x, lydie))\nAculeate(danni) -> Libel(danni, lydie)\nforall x (Libel(x, lydie) -> not Broaden(lydie, gertruda))\nforall x (Libel(x, lydie) -> Stoppable(x))\nBayonet(danni, lydie) -> Bursiform(danni)\nforall x (Bayonet(x, lydie) and not Libel(x, lydie) -> not Libel(x, gertruda))\n\nStoppable(gertruda)\n\nLibel(gertruda, lydie) and forall x (Libel(x, lydie) -> Stoppable(x)) -> therefore Stoppable(gertruda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The tiffanie quarry the nan. The tiffanie quantify the nan. The tiffanie unbar the nan. The madona is three. The madona is haploidic. The madona unbar the tiffanie. The madona unbar the nan. The nan quarry the madona. The nan quantify the tiffanie. The nan is ferny. The nan is three. The nan does not see the madona. If the madona quantify the nan and the nan does not eat the madona then the madona quantify the tiffanie. If the nan unbar the madona and the nan is not ferny then the madona is rattling. If someone is ferny then they eat the nan. If the madona is rattling then the madona quantify the nan. If someone quantify the nan then the nan does not see the tiffanie. If someone quantify the nan then they are haploidic. If the madona quarry the nan then the madona is ferny. If someone quarry the nan and they do not eat the nan then they do not eat the tiffanie. The nan unbar the tiffanie.", "logic": "\nQuarry(tiffanie, nan)\nQuantify(tiffanie, nan)\nUnbar(tiffanie, nan)\nThree(madona)\nHaploidic(madona)\nUnbar(madona, tiffanie)\nUnbar(madona, nan)\nQuarry(nan, madona)\nQuantify(nan, tiffanie)\nFerny(nan)\nThree(nan)\nnot Unbar(nan, madona)\nQuantify(madona, nan) and not Quantify(nan, madona) -> Quantify(madona, tiffanie)\nUnbar(nan, madona) and not Ferny(nan) -> Rattling(madona)\nforall x (Ferny(x) -> Quantify(x, nan))\nRattling(madona) -> Quantify(madona, nan)\nforall x (Quantify(x, nan) -> not Unbar(nan, tiffanie))\nforall x (Quantify(x, nan) -> Haploidic(x))\nQuarry(madona, nan) -> Ferny(madona)\nforall x (Quarry(x, nan) and not Quantify(x, nan) -> not Quantify(x, tiffanie))\n\nUnbar(nan, tiffanie)\n\nQuantify(tiffanie, nan) and forall x (Quantify(x, nan) -> not Unbar(nan, tiffanie)) -> therefore not Unbar(nan, tiffanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The tome desex the lina. The tome sunder the lina. The tome pitch the lina. The joscelin is scorched. The joscelin is unmelodic. The joscelin pitch the tome. The joscelin pitch the lina. The lina desex the joscelin. The lina sunder the tome. The lina is cognisant. The lina is scorched. The lina does not see the joscelin. If the joscelin sunder the lina and the lina does not eat the joscelin then the joscelin sunder the tome. If the lina pitch the joscelin and the lina is not cognisant then the joscelin is autonomic. If someone is cognisant then they eat the lina. If the joscelin is autonomic then the joscelin sunder the lina. If someone sunder the lina then the lina does not see the tome. If someone sunder the lina then they are unmelodic. If the joscelin desex the lina then the joscelin is cognisant. If someone desex the lina and they do not eat the lina then they do not eat the tome. The lina is unmelodic.", "logic": "\nDesex(tome, lina)\nSunder(tome, lina)\nPitch(tome, lina)\nScorched(joscelin)\nUnmelodic(joscelin)\nPitch(joscelin, tome)\nPitch(joscelin, lina)\nDesex(lina, joscelin)\nSunder(lina, tome)\nCognisant(lina)\nScorched(lina)\nnot Pitch(lina, joscelin)\nSunder(joscelin, lina) and not Sunder(lina, joscelin) -> Sunder(joscelin, tome)\nPitch(lina, joscelin) and not Cognisant(lina) -> Autonomic(joscelin)\nforall x (Cognisant(x) -> Sunder(x, lina))\nAutonomic(joscelin) -> Sunder(joscelin, lina)\nforall x (Sunder(x, lina) -> not Pitch(lina, tome))\nforall x (Sunder(x, lina) -> Unmelodic(x))\nDesex(joscelin, lina) -> Cognisant(joscelin)\nforall x (Desex(x, lina) and not Sunder(x, lina) -> not Sunder(x, tome))\n\nUnmelodic(lina)\n\nCognisant(lina) and forall x (Cognisant(x) -> Sunder(x, lina)) -> therefore Sunder(lina, lina) Sunder(lina, lina) and forall x (Sunder(x, lina) -> Unmelodic(x)) -> therefore Unmelodic(lina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The patric germinate the dyna. The patric demonetise the dyna. The patric coldcock the dyna. The maura is neglected. The maura is elegant. The maura coldcock the patric. The maura coldcock the dyna. The dyna germinate the maura. The dyna demonetise the patric. The dyna is ruddy. The dyna is neglected. The dyna does not see the maura. If the maura demonetise the dyna and the dyna does not eat the maura then the maura demonetise the patric. If the dyna coldcock the maura and the dyna is not ruddy then the maura is boney. If someone is ruddy then they eat the dyna. If the maura is boney then the maura demonetise the dyna. If someone demonetise the dyna then the dyna does not see the patric. If someone demonetise the dyna then they are elegant. If the maura germinate the dyna then the maura is ruddy. If someone germinate the dyna and they do not eat the dyna then they do not eat the patric. The dyna is not elegant.", "logic": "\nGerminate(patric, dyna)\nDemonetise(patric, dyna)\nColdcock(patric, dyna)\nNeglected(maura)\nElegant(maura)\nColdcock(maura, patric)\nColdcock(maura, dyna)\nGerminate(dyna, maura)\nDemonetise(dyna, patric)\nRuddy(dyna)\nNeglected(dyna)\nnot Coldcock(dyna, maura)\nDemonetise(maura, dyna) and not Demonetise(dyna, maura) -> Demonetise(maura, patric)\nColdcock(dyna, maura) and not Ruddy(dyna) -> Boney(maura)\nforall x (Ruddy(x) -> Demonetise(x, dyna))\nBoney(maura) -> Demonetise(maura, dyna)\nforall x (Demonetise(x, dyna) -> not Coldcock(dyna, patric))\nforall x (Demonetise(x, dyna) -> Elegant(x))\nGerminate(maura, dyna) -> Ruddy(maura)\nforall x (Germinate(x, dyna) and not Demonetise(x, dyna) -> not Demonetise(x, patric))\n\nnot Elegant(dyna)\n\nRuddy(dyna) and forall x (Ruddy(x) -> Demonetise(x, dyna)) -> therefore Demonetise(dyna, dyna) Demonetise(dyna, dyna) and forall x (Demonetise(x, dyna) -> Elegant(x)) -> therefore Elegant(dyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The paola colligate the camel. The paola surfboard the camel. The paola grubstake the camel. The zach is thyrotoxic. The zach is punishing. The zach grubstake the paola. The zach grubstake the camel. The camel colligate the zach. The camel surfboard the paola. The camel is unrouged. The camel is thyrotoxic. The camel does not see the zach. If the zach surfboard the camel and the camel does not eat the zach then the zach surfboard the paola. If the camel grubstake the zach and the camel is not unrouged then the zach is tolerable. If someone is unrouged then they eat the camel. If the zach is tolerable then the zach surfboard the camel. If someone surfboard the camel then the camel does not see the paola. If someone surfboard the camel then they are punishing. If the zach colligate the camel then the zach is unrouged. If someone colligate the camel and they do not eat the camel then they do not eat the paola. The zach does not eat the camel.", "logic": "\nColligate(paola, camel)\nSurfboard(paola, camel)\nGrubstake(paola, camel)\nThyrotoxic(zach)\nPunishing(zach)\nGrubstake(zach, paola)\nGrubstake(zach, camel)\nColligate(camel, zach)\nSurfboard(camel, paola)\nUnrouged(camel)\nThyrotoxic(camel)\nnot Grubstake(camel, zach)\nSurfboard(zach, camel) and not Surfboard(camel, zach) -> Surfboard(zach, paola)\nGrubstake(camel, zach) and not Unrouged(camel) -> Tolerable(zach)\nforall x (Unrouged(x) -> Surfboard(x, camel))\nTolerable(zach) -> Surfboard(zach, camel)\nforall x (Surfboard(x, camel) -> not Grubstake(camel, paola))\nforall x (Surfboard(x, camel) -> Punishing(x))\nColligate(zach, camel) -> Unrouged(zach)\nforall x (Colligate(x, camel) and not Surfboard(x, camel) -> not Surfboard(x, paola))\n\nnot Surfboard(zach, camel)\n\nforall x (Unrouged(x) -> Surfboard(x, camel)) <- Colligate(zach, camel) -> Unrouged(zach) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The hamid rove the starlene. The hamid fire the starlene. The hamid forgive the starlene. The socrates is deceptive. The socrates is lovable. The socrates forgive the hamid. The socrates forgive the starlene. The starlene rove the socrates. The starlene fire the hamid. The starlene is hibernal. The starlene is deceptive. The starlene does not see the socrates. If the socrates fire the starlene and the starlene does not eat the socrates then the socrates fire the hamid. If the starlene forgive the socrates and the starlene is not hibernal then the socrates is prakritic. If someone is hibernal then they eat the starlene. If the socrates is prakritic then the socrates fire the starlene. If someone fire the starlene then the starlene does not see the hamid. If someone fire the starlene then they are lovable. If the socrates rove the starlene then the socrates is hibernal. If someone rove the starlene and they do not eat the starlene then they do not eat the hamid. The socrates fire the hamid.", "logic": "\nRove(hamid, starlene)\nFire(hamid, starlene)\nForgive(hamid, starlene)\nDeceptive(socrates)\nLovable(socrates)\nForgive(socrates, hamid)\nForgive(socrates, starlene)\nRove(starlene, socrates)\nFire(starlene, hamid)\nHibernal(starlene)\nDeceptive(starlene)\nnot Forgive(starlene, socrates)\nFire(socrates, starlene) and not Fire(starlene, socrates) -> Fire(socrates, hamid)\nForgive(starlene, socrates) and not Hibernal(starlene) -> Prakritic(socrates)\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Fire(x, starlene))\nPrakritic(socrates) -> Fire(socrates, starlene)\nforall x (Fire(x, starlene) -> not Forgive(starlene, hamid))\nforall x (Fire(x, starlene) -> Lovable(x))\nRove(socrates, starlene) -> Hibernal(socrates)\nforall x (Rove(x, starlene) and not Fire(x, starlene) -> not Fire(x, hamid))\n\nFire(socrates, hamid)\n\nFire(socrates, starlene) and not Fire(starlene, socrates) -> Fire(socrates, hamid) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The earl novelise the patricia. The earl gentrify the patricia. The earl disrespect the patricia. The lara is fearsome. The lara is ramose. The lara disrespect the earl. The lara disrespect the patricia. The patricia novelise the lara. The patricia gentrify the earl. The patricia is botanic. The patricia is fearsome. The patricia does not see the lara. If the lara gentrify the patricia and the patricia does not eat the lara then the lara gentrify the earl. If the patricia disrespect the lara and the patricia is not botanic then the lara is myopic. If someone is botanic then they eat the patricia. If the lara is myopic then the lara gentrify the patricia. If someone gentrify the patricia then the patricia does not see the earl. If someone gentrify the patricia then they are ramose. If the lara novelise the patricia then the lara is botanic. If someone novelise the patricia and they do not eat the patricia then they do not eat the earl. The lara is not botanic.", "logic": "\nNovelise(earl, patricia)\nGentrify(earl, patricia)\nDisrespect(earl, patricia)\nFearsome(lara)\nRamose(lara)\nDisrespect(lara, earl)\nDisrespect(lara, patricia)\nNovelise(patricia, lara)\nGentrify(patricia, earl)\nBotanic(patricia)\nFearsome(patricia)\nnot Disrespect(patricia, lara)\nGentrify(lara, patricia) and not Gentrify(patricia, lara) -> Gentrify(lara, earl)\nDisrespect(patricia, lara) and not Botanic(patricia) -> Myopic(lara)\nforall x (Botanic(x) -> Gentrify(x, patricia))\nMyopic(lara) -> Gentrify(lara, patricia)\nforall x (Gentrify(x, patricia) -> not Disrespect(patricia, earl))\nforall x (Gentrify(x, patricia) -> Ramose(x))\nNovelise(lara, patricia) -> Botanic(lara)\nforall x (Novelise(x, patricia) and not Gentrify(x, patricia) -> not Gentrify(x, earl))\n\nnot Botanic(lara)\n\nNovelise(lara, patricia) -> Botanic(lara) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The conan denudate the odilia. The conan zipper the odilia. The conan bequeath the odilia. The karyn is hypnotised. The karyn is reverse. The karyn bequeath the conan. The karyn bequeath the odilia. The odilia denudate the karyn. The odilia zipper the conan. The odilia is omnipotent. The odilia is hypnotised. The odilia does not see the karyn. If the karyn zipper the odilia and the odilia does not eat the karyn then the karyn zipper the conan. If the odilia bequeath the karyn and the odilia is not omnipotent then the karyn is billionth. If someone is omnipotent then they eat the odilia. If the karyn is billionth then the karyn zipper the odilia. If someone zipper the odilia then the odilia does not see the conan. If someone zipper the odilia then they are reverse. If the karyn denudate the odilia then the karyn is omnipotent. If someone denudate the odilia and they do not eat the odilia then they do not eat the conan. The conan is omnipotent.", "logic": "\nDenudate(conan, odilia)\nZipper(conan, odilia)\nBequeath(conan, odilia)\nHypnotised(karyn)\nReverse(karyn)\nBequeath(karyn, conan)\nBequeath(karyn, odilia)\nDenudate(odilia, karyn)\nZipper(odilia, conan)\nOmnipotent(odilia)\nHypnotised(odilia)\nnot Bequeath(odilia, karyn)\nZipper(karyn, odilia) and not Zipper(odilia, karyn) -> Zipper(karyn, conan)\nBequeath(odilia, karyn) and not Omnipotent(odilia) -> Billionth(karyn)\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) -> Zipper(x, odilia))\nBillionth(karyn) -> Zipper(karyn, odilia)\nforall x (Zipper(x, odilia) -> not Bequeath(odilia, conan))\nforall x (Zipper(x, odilia) -> Reverse(x))\nDenudate(karyn, odilia) -> Omnipotent(karyn)\nforall x (Denudate(x, odilia) and not Zipper(x, odilia) -> not Zipper(x, conan))\n\nOmnipotent(conan)\n\nOmnipotent(conan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The nikita host the martino. The nikita reflect the martino. The nikita gesture the martino. The orton is motorial. The orton is scrappy. The orton gesture the nikita. The orton gesture the martino. The martino host the orton. The martino reflect the nikita. The martino is armless. The martino is motorial. The martino does not see the orton. If the orton reflect the martino and the martino does not eat the orton then the orton reflect the nikita. If the martino gesture the orton and the martino is not armless then the orton is wasteful. If someone is armless then they eat the martino. If the orton is wasteful then the orton reflect the martino. If someone reflect the martino then the martino does not see the nikita. If someone reflect the martino then they are scrappy. If the orton host the martino then the orton is armless. If someone host the martino and they do not eat the martino then they do not eat the nikita. The nikita does not see the orton.", "logic": "\nHost(nikita, martino)\nReflect(nikita, martino)\nGesture(nikita, martino)\nMotorial(orton)\nScrappy(orton)\nGesture(orton, nikita)\nGesture(orton, martino)\nHost(martino, orton)\nReflect(martino, nikita)\nArmless(martino)\nMotorial(martino)\nnot Gesture(martino, orton)\nReflect(orton, martino) and not Reflect(martino, orton) -> Reflect(orton, nikita)\nGesture(martino, orton) and not Armless(martino) -> Wasteful(orton)\nforall x (Armless(x) -> Reflect(x, martino))\nWasteful(orton) -> Reflect(orton, martino)\nforall x (Reflect(x, martino) -> not Gesture(martino, nikita))\nforall x (Reflect(x, martino) -> Scrappy(x))\nHost(orton, martino) -> Armless(orton)\nforall x (Host(x, martino) and not Reflect(x, martino) -> not Reflect(x, nikita))\n\nnot Gesture(nikita, orton)\n\nnot Gesture(nikita, orton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "The sharlene curdle the caril. The sharlene retrain the caril. The sharlene rail the caril. The golda is doting. The golda is statewide. The golda rail the sharlene. The golda rail the caril. The caril curdle the golda. The caril retrain the sharlene. The caril is mistakable. The caril is doting. The caril does not see the golda. If the golda retrain the caril and the caril does not eat the golda then the golda retrain the sharlene. If the caril rail the golda and the caril is not mistakable then the golda is jointed. If someone is mistakable then they eat the caril. If the golda is jointed then the golda retrain the caril. If someone retrain the caril then the caril does not see the sharlene. If someone retrain the caril then they are statewide. If the golda curdle the caril then the golda is mistakable. If someone curdle the caril and they do not eat the caril then they do not eat the sharlene. The sharlene retrain the golda.", "logic": "\nCurdle(sharlene, caril)\nRetrain(sharlene, caril)\nRail(sharlene, caril)\nDoting(golda)\nStatewide(golda)\nRail(golda, sharlene)\nRail(golda, caril)\nCurdle(caril, golda)\nRetrain(caril, sharlene)\nMistakable(caril)\nDoting(caril)\nnot Rail(caril, golda)\nRetrain(golda, caril) and not Retrain(caril, golda) -> Retrain(golda, sharlene)\nRail(caril, golda) and not Mistakable(caril) -> Jointed(golda)\nforall x (Mistakable(x) -> Retrain(x, caril))\nJointed(golda) -> Retrain(golda, caril)\nforall x (Retrain(x, caril) -> not Rail(caril, sharlene))\nforall x (Retrain(x, caril) -> Statewide(x))\nCurdle(golda, caril) -> Mistakable(golda)\nforall x (Curdle(x, caril) and not Retrain(x, caril) -> not Retrain(x, sharlene))\n\nRetrain(sharlene, golda)\n\nRetrain(sharlene, golda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-2157"} {"premises": "Reggy is viceregal. Reggy is tranquil. Reggy is andalusian. Vassili is viceregal. Vassili is wormy. Vassili is andalusian. Vassili is muzzy. All andalusian, muzzy things are tranquil. If something is muzzy then it is wormy. If Reggy is tranquil then Reggy is viceregal. If Reggy is muzzy then Reggy is wormy. All wormy, andalusian things are wooden. All viceregal, wormy things are muzzy. If something is andalusian then it is muzzy. If something is muzzy then it is wormy. Reggy is tranquil.", "logic": "\nViceregal(reggy)\nTranquil(reggy)\nAndalusian(reggy)\nViceregal(vassili)\nWormy(vassili)\nAndalusian(vassili)\nMuzzy(vassili)\nforall x (Andalusian(x) and Muzzy(x) -> Tranquil(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Wormy(x))\nTranquil(reggy) -> Viceregal(reggy)\nMuzzy(reggy) -> Wormy(reggy)\nforall x (Wormy(x) and Andalusian(x) -> Wooden(x))\nforall x (Viceregal(x) and Wormy(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Andalusian(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Wormy(x))\n\nTranquil(reggy)\n\ntherefore Tranquil(reggy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Obadias is rhyming. Obadias is nosey. Obadias is predaceous. Abelard is rhyming. Abelard is biconvex. Abelard is predaceous. Abelard is bacterioid. All predaceous, bacterioid things are nosey. If something is bacterioid then it is biconvex. If Obadias is nosey then Obadias is rhyming. If Obadias is bacterioid then Obadias is biconvex. All biconvex, predaceous things are plumb. All rhyming, biconvex things are bacterioid. If something is predaceous then it is bacterioid. If something is bacterioid then it is biconvex. Abelard is not bacterioid.", "logic": "\nRhyming(obadias)\nNosey(obadias)\nPredaceous(obadias)\nRhyming(abelard)\nBiconvex(abelard)\nPredaceous(abelard)\nBacterioid(abelard)\nforall x (Predaceous(x) and Bacterioid(x) -> Nosey(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Biconvex(x))\nNosey(obadias) -> Rhyming(obadias)\nBacterioid(obadias) -> Biconvex(obadias)\nforall x (Biconvex(x) and Predaceous(x) -> Plumb(x))\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and Biconvex(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Predaceous(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Biconvex(x))\n\nnot Bacterioid(abelard)\n\ntherefore Bacterioid(abelard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Madella is jaggy. Madella is agonised. Madella is dressed. Thea is jaggy. Thea is precarious. Thea is dressed. Thea is calced. All dressed, calced things are agonised. If something is calced then it is precarious. If Madella is agonised then Madella is jaggy. If Madella is calced then Madella is precarious. All precarious, dressed things are dormie. All jaggy, precarious things are calced. If something is dressed then it is calced. If something is calced then it is precarious. Thea is dormie.", "logic": "\nJaggy(madella)\nAgonised(madella)\nDressed(madella)\nJaggy(thea)\nPrecarious(thea)\nDressed(thea)\nCalced(thea)\nforall x (Dressed(x) and Calced(x) -> Agonised(x))\nforall x (Calced(x) -> Precarious(x))\nAgonised(madella) -> Jaggy(madella)\nCalced(madella) -> Precarious(madella)\nforall x (Precarious(x) and Dressed(x) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Jaggy(x) and Precarious(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Dressed(x) -> Calced(x))\nforall x (Calced(x) -> Precarious(x))\n\nDormie(thea)\n\nPrecarious(thea) and Dressed(thea) and forall x (Precarious(x) and Dressed(x) -> Dormie(x)) -> therefore Dormie(thea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Artur is bimestrial. Artur is bengali. Artur is impassable. Alvera is bimestrial. Alvera is nonprofit. Alvera is impassable. Alvera is marvellous. All impassable, marvellous things are bengali. If something is marvellous then it is nonprofit. If Artur is bengali then Artur is bimestrial. If Artur is marvellous then Artur is nonprofit. All nonprofit, impassable things are offside. All bimestrial, nonprofit things are marvellous. If something is impassable then it is marvellous. If something is marvellous then it is nonprofit. Artur is not marvellous.", "logic": "\nBimestrial(artur)\nBengali(artur)\nImpassable(artur)\nBimestrial(alvera)\nNonprofit(alvera)\nImpassable(alvera)\nMarvellous(alvera)\nforall x (Impassable(x) and Marvellous(x) -> Bengali(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\nBengali(artur) -> Bimestrial(artur)\nMarvellous(artur) -> Nonprofit(artur)\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) and Impassable(x) -> Offside(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) and Nonprofit(x) -> Marvellous(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Marvellous(x))\nforall x (Marvellous(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\n\nnot Marvellous(artur)\n\nImpassable(artur) and forall x (Impassable(x) -> Marvellous(x)) -> therefore Marvellous(artur)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Kettie is pyloric. Kettie is fruticose. Kettie is upcurved. Tiertza is pyloric. Tiertza is plotted. Tiertza is upcurved. Tiertza is bacchanal. All upcurved, bacchanal things are fruticose. If something is bacchanal then it is plotted. If Kettie is fruticose then Kettie is pyloric. If Kettie is bacchanal then Kettie is plotted. All plotted, upcurved things are observing. All pyloric, plotted things are bacchanal. If something is upcurved then it is bacchanal. If something is bacchanal then it is plotted. Kettie is plotted.", "logic": "\nPyloric(kettie)\nFruticose(kettie)\nUpcurved(kettie)\nPyloric(tiertza)\nPlotted(tiertza)\nUpcurved(tiertza)\nBacchanal(tiertza)\nforall x (Upcurved(x) and Bacchanal(x) -> Fruticose(x))\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Plotted(x))\nFruticose(kettie) -> Pyloric(kettie)\nBacchanal(kettie) -> Plotted(kettie)\nforall x (Plotted(x) and Upcurved(x) -> Observing(x))\nforall x (Pyloric(x) and Plotted(x) -> Bacchanal(x))\nforall x (Upcurved(x) -> Bacchanal(x))\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Plotted(x))\n\nPlotted(kettie)\n\nUpcurved(kettie) and forall x (Upcurved(x) -> Bacchanal(x)) -> therefore Bacchanal(kettie) Bacchanal(kettie) and forall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Plotted(x)) -> therefore Plotted(kettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Hortensia is ambrosian. Hortensia is carinal. Hortensia is offhand. Aub is ambrosian. Aub is bayesian. Aub is offhand. Aub is fortunate. All offhand, fortunate things are carinal. If something is fortunate then it is bayesian. If Hortensia is carinal then Hortensia is ambrosian. If Hortensia is fortunate then Hortensia is bayesian. All bayesian, offhand things are brazilian. All ambrosian, bayesian things are fortunate. If something is offhand then it is fortunate. If something is fortunate then it is bayesian. Hortensia is not bayesian.", "logic": "\nAmbrosian(hortensia)\nCarinal(hortensia)\nOffhand(hortensia)\nAmbrosian(aub)\nBayesian(aub)\nOffhand(aub)\nFortunate(aub)\nforall x (Offhand(x) and Fortunate(x) -> Carinal(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Bayesian(x))\nCarinal(hortensia) -> Ambrosian(hortensia)\nFortunate(hortensia) -> Bayesian(hortensia)\nforall x (Bayesian(x) and Offhand(x) -> Brazilian(x))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) and Bayesian(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Bayesian(x))\n\nnot Bayesian(hortensia)\n\nOffhand(hortensia) and forall x (Offhand(x) -> Fortunate(x)) -> therefore Fortunate(hortensia) Fortunate(hortensia) and forall x (Fortunate(x) -> Bayesian(x)) -> therefore Bayesian(hortensia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Mortie is unvigilant. Mortie is invincible. Mortie is faulty. Kalle is unvigilant. Kalle is weedy. Kalle is faulty. Kalle is brinded. All faulty, brinded things are invincible. If something is brinded then it is weedy. If Mortie is invincible then Mortie is unvigilant. If Mortie is brinded then Mortie is weedy. All weedy, faulty things are morbific. All unvigilant, weedy things are brinded. If something is faulty then it is brinded. If something is brinded then it is weedy. Mortie is morbific.", "logic": "\nUnvigilant(mortie)\nInvincible(mortie)\nFaulty(mortie)\nUnvigilant(kalle)\nWeedy(kalle)\nFaulty(kalle)\nBrinded(kalle)\nforall x (Faulty(x) and Brinded(x) -> Invincible(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Weedy(x))\nInvincible(mortie) -> Unvigilant(mortie)\nBrinded(mortie) -> Weedy(mortie)\nforall x (Weedy(x) and Faulty(x) -> Morbific(x))\nforall x (Unvigilant(x) and Weedy(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Faulty(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Weedy(x))\n\nMorbific(mortie)\n\nFaulty(mortie) and forall x (Faulty(x) -> Brinded(x)) -> therefore Brinded(mortie) Brinded(mortie) and forall x (Brinded(x) -> Weedy(x)) -> therefore Weedy(mortie) Weedy(mortie) and Faulty(mortie) and forall x (Weedy(x) and Faulty(x) -> Morbific(x)) -> therefore Morbific(mortie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Franny is clustered. Franny is thudding. Franny is shattering. Etta is clustered. Etta is sceptical. Etta is shattering. Etta is haploid. All shattering, haploid things are thudding. If something is haploid then it is sceptical. If Franny is thudding then Franny is clustered. If Franny is haploid then Franny is sceptical. All sceptical, shattering things are climatic. All clustered, sceptical things are haploid. If something is shattering then it is haploid. If something is haploid then it is sceptical. Franny is not climatic.", "logic": "\nClustered(franny)\nThudding(franny)\nShattering(franny)\nClustered(etta)\nSceptical(etta)\nShattering(etta)\nHaploid(etta)\nforall x (Shattering(x) and Haploid(x) -> Thudding(x))\nforall x (Haploid(x) -> Sceptical(x))\nThudding(franny) -> Clustered(franny)\nHaploid(franny) -> Sceptical(franny)\nforall x (Sceptical(x) and Shattering(x) -> Climatic(x))\nforall x (Clustered(x) and Sceptical(x) -> Haploid(x))\nforall x (Shattering(x) -> Haploid(x))\nforall x (Haploid(x) -> Sceptical(x))\n\nnot Climatic(franny)\n\nShattering(franny) and forall x (Shattering(x) -> Haploid(x)) -> therefore Haploid(franny) Haploid(franny) and forall x (Haploid(x) -> Sceptical(x)) -> therefore Sceptical(franny) Sceptical(franny) and Shattering(franny) and forall x (Sceptical(x) and Shattering(x) -> Climatic(x)) -> therefore Climatic(franny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Bettine is connubial. Bettine is injured. Bettine is hesitating. Alecia is connubial. Alecia is untuneful. Alecia is hesitating. Alecia is bloodless. All hesitating, bloodless things are injured. If something is bloodless then it is untuneful. If Bettine is injured then Bettine is connubial. If Bettine is bloodless then Bettine is untuneful. All untuneful, hesitating things are hard. All connubial, untuneful things are bloodless. If something is hesitating then it is bloodless. If something is bloodless then it is untuneful. Alecia is not kind.", "logic": "\nConnubial(bettine)\nInjured(bettine)\nHesitating(bettine)\nConnubial(alecia)\nUntuneful(alecia)\nHesitating(alecia)\nBloodless(alecia)\nforall x (Hesitating(x) and Bloodless(x) -> Injured(x))\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Untuneful(x))\nInjured(bettine) -> Connubial(bettine)\nBloodless(bettine) -> Untuneful(bettine)\nforall x (Untuneful(x) and Hesitating(x) -> Hard(x))\nforall x (Connubial(x) and Untuneful(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Hesitating(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Untuneful(x))\n\nnot Kind(alecia)\n\nnot Kind(alecia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Elliott is spry. Elliott is desecrated. Elliott is overseas. Emmalynn is spry. Emmalynn is aleuronic. Emmalynn is overseas. Emmalynn is quartan. All overseas, quartan things are desecrated. If something is quartan then it is aleuronic. If Elliott is desecrated then Elliott is spry. If Elliott is quartan then Elliott is aleuronic. All aleuronic, overseas things are chargeable. All spry, aleuronic things are quartan. If something is overseas then it is quartan. If something is quartan then it is aleuronic. Elliott is kind.", "logic": "\nSpry(elliott)\nDesecrated(elliott)\nOverseas(elliott)\nSpry(emmalynn)\nAleuronic(emmalynn)\nOverseas(emmalynn)\nQuartan(emmalynn)\nforall x (Overseas(x) and Quartan(x) -> Desecrated(x))\nforall x (Quartan(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\nDesecrated(elliott) -> Spry(elliott)\nQuartan(elliott) -> Aleuronic(elliott)\nforall x (Aleuronic(x) and Overseas(x) -> Chargeable(x))\nforall x (Spry(x) and Aleuronic(x) -> Quartan(x))\nforall x (Overseas(x) -> Quartan(x))\nforall x (Quartan(x) -> Aleuronic(x))\n\nKind(elliott)\n\nKind(elliott) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Gwenni is calamitous. Gwenni is knobbed. Gwenni is infatuated. Blue people are prodromal. All scheming, calamitous people are knobbed. All scheming, offensive people are upcurved. Kind people are calamitous. If Gwenni is prodromal and Gwenni is infatuated then Gwenni is scheming. Young people are offensive. Gwenni is calamitous.", "logic": "\nCalamitous(gwenni)\nKnobbed(gwenni)\nInfatuated(gwenni)\nforall x (Calamitous(x) -> Prodromal(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) and Calamitous(x) -> Knobbed(x))\nforall x (Scheming(x) and Offensive(x) -> Upcurved(x))\nforall x (Knobbed(x) -> Calamitous(x))\nProdromal(gwenni) and Infatuated(gwenni) -> Scheming(gwenni)\nforall x (Infatuated(x) -> Offensive(x))\n\nCalamitous(gwenni)\n\ntherefore Calamitous(gwenni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Ware is tapestried. Ware is deaf. Ware is ergodic. Blue people are presto. All lesser, tapestried people are deaf. All lesser, unwooded people are pancreatic. Kind people are tapestried. If Ware is presto and Ware is ergodic then Ware is lesser. Young people are unwooded. Ware is not tapestried.", "logic": "\nTapestried(ware)\nDeaf(ware)\nErgodic(ware)\nforall x (Tapestried(x) -> Presto(x))\nforall x (Lesser(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Lesser(x) and Unwooded(x) -> Pancreatic(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nPresto(ware) and Ergodic(ware) -> Lesser(ware)\nforall x (Ergodic(x) -> Unwooded(x))\n\nnot Tapestried(ware)\n\ntherefore Tapestried(ware)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Murray is xcvi. Murray is anaemic. Murray is unbraced. Blue people are slapdash. All sleeveless, xcvi people are anaemic. All sleeveless, denatured people are cissy. Kind people are xcvi. If Murray is slapdash and Murray is unbraced then Murray is sleeveless. Young people are denatured. Murray is denatured.", "logic": "\nXcvi(murray)\nAnaemic(murray)\nUnbraced(murray)\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) and Xcvi(x) -> Anaemic(x))\nforall x (Sleeveless(x) and Denatured(x) -> Cissy(x))\nforall x (Anaemic(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nSlapdash(murray) and Unbraced(murray) -> Sleeveless(murray)\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Denatured(x))\n\nDenatured(murray)\n\nUnbraced(murray) and forall x (Unbraced(x) -> Denatured(x)) -> therefore Denatured(murray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Ofilia is sullen. Ofilia is bavarian. Ofilia is burdenless. Blue people are pareve. All bimetallic, sullen people are bavarian. All bimetallic, offhanded people are intestinal. Kind people are sullen. If Ofilia is pareve and Ofilia is burdenless then Ofilia is bimetallic. Young people are offhanded. Ofilia is not offhanded.", "logic": "\nSullen(ofilia)\nBavarian(ofilia)\nBurdenless(ofilia)\nforall x (Sullen(x) -> Pareve(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and Sullen(x) -> Bavarian(x))\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and Offhanded(x) -> Intestinal(x))\nforall x (Bavarian(x) -> Sullen(x))\nPareve(ofilia) and Burdenless(ofilia) -> Bimetallic(ofilia)\nforall x (Burdenless(x) -> Offhanded(x))\n\nnot Offhanded(ofilia)\n\nBurdenless(ofilia) and forall x (Burdenless(x) -> Offhanded(x)) -> therefore Offhanded(ofilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Yoshiko is unclogged. Yoshiko is caffeinic. Yoshiko is supine. Blue people are flat. All amerind, unclogged people are caffeinic. All amerind, gestural people are atrophic. Kind people are unclogged. If Yoshiko is flat and Yoshiko is supine then Yoshiko is amerind. Young people are gestural. Yoshiko is amerind.", "logic": "\nUnclogged(yoshiko)\nCaffeinic(yoshiko)\nSupine(yoshiko)\nforall x (Unclogged(x) -> Flat(x))\nforall x (Amerind(x) and Unclogged(x) -> Caffeinic(x))\nforall x (Amerind(x) and Gestural(x) -> Atrophic(x))\nforall x (Caffeinic(x) -> Unclogged(x))\nFlat(yoshiko) and Supine(yoshiko) -> Amerind(yoshiko)\nforall x (Supine(x) -> Gestural(x))\n\nAmerind(yoshiko)\n\nUnclogged(yoshiko) and forall x (Unclogged(x) -> Flat(x)) -> therefore Flat(yoshiko) Flat(yoshiko) and Supine(yoshiko) and Flat(yoshiko) and Supine(yoshiko) -> Amerind(yoshiko) -> therefore Amerind(yoshiko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Shari is hateful. Shari is aeronautic. Shari is polyglot. Blue people are witching. All shamefaced, hateful people are aeronautic. All shamefaced, censorial people are accentual. Kind people are hateful. If Shari is witching and Shari is polyglot then Shari is shamefaced. Young people are censorial. Shari is not shamefaced.", "logic": "\nHateful(shari)\nAeronautic(shari)\nPolyglot(shari)\nforall x (Hateful(x) -> Witching(x))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and Hateful(x) -> Aeronautic(x))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and Censorial(x) -> Accentual(x))\nforall x (Aeronautic(x) -> Hateful(x))\nWitching(shari) and Polyglot(shari) -> Shamefaced(shari)\nforall x (Polyglot(x) -> Censorial(x))\n\nnot Shamefaced(shari)\n\nHateful(shari) and forall x (Hateful(x) -> Witching(x)) -> therefore Witching(shari) Witching(shari) and Polyglot(shari) and Witching(shari) and Polyglot(shari) -> Shamefaced(shari) -> therefore Shamefaced(shari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Ketti is fiscal. Ketti is churchly. Ketti is civilised. Blue people are angry. All unfearing, fiscal people are churchly. All unfearing, podgy people are hitless. Kind people are fiscal. If Ketti is angry and Ketti is civilised then Ketti is unfearing. Young people are podgy. Ketti is hitless.", "logic": "\nFiscal(ketti)\nChurchly(ketti)\nCivilised(ketti)\nforall x (Fiscal(x) -> Angry(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Fiscal(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Podgy(x) -> Hitless(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) -> Fiscal(x))\nAngry(ketti) and Civilised(ketti) -> Unfearing(ketti)\nforall x (Civilised(x) -> Podgy(x))\n\nHitless(ketti)\n\nFiscal(ketti) and forall x (Fiscal(x) -> Angry(x)) -> therefore Angry(ketti) Angry(ketti) and Civilised(ketti) and Angry(ketti) and Civilised(ketti) -> Unfearing(ketti) -> therefore Unfearing(ketti) Civilised(ketti) and forall x (Civilised(x) -> Podgy(x)) -> therefore Podgy(ketti) Unfearing(ketti) and Podgy(ketti) and forall x (Unfearing(x) and Podgy(x) -> Hitless(x)) -> therefore Hitless(ketti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "Yule is salted. Yule is hereditary. Yule is antinomian. Blue people are ambient. All echoing, salted people are hereditary. All echoing, dangerous people are wanting. Kind people are salted. If Yule is ambient and Yule is antinomian then Yule is echoing. Young people are dangerous. Yule is not wanting.", "logic": "\nSalted(yule)\nHereditary(yule)\nAntinomian(yule)\nforall x (Salted(x) -> Ambient(x))\nforall x (Echoing(x) and Salted(x) -> Hereditary(x))\nforall x (Echoing(x) and Dangerous(x) -> Wanting(x))\nforall x (Hereditary(x) -> Salted(x))\nAmbient(yule) and Antinomian(yule) -> Echoing(yule)\nforall x (Antinomian(x) -> Dangerous(x))\n\nnot Wanting(yule)\n\nSalted(yule) and forall x (Salted(x) -> Ambient(x)) -> therefore Ambient(yule) Ambient(yule) and Antinomian(yule) and Ambient(yule) and Antinomian(yule) -> Echoing(yule) -> therefore Echoing(yule) Antinomian(yule) and forall x (Antinomian(x) -> Dangerous(x)) -> therefore Dangerous(yule) Echoing(yule) and Dangerous(yule) and forall x (Echoing(x) and Dangerous(x) -> Wanting(x)) -> therefore Wanting(yule)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1276"} {"premises": "The gusty clock the pippa. The pippa surprise the gusty. If someone surprise the gusty then the gusty is miry. If someone clock the gusty and they are busy then they see the pippa. If someone clock the pippa then they like the gusty. The gusty clock the pippa.", "logic": "\nClock(gusty, pippa)\nSurprise(pippa, gusty)\nforall x (Surprise(x, gusty) -> Miry(gusty))\nforall x (Clock(x, gusty) and Busy(x) -> Surprise(x, pippa))\nforall x (Clock(x, pippa) -> Motorcycle(x, gusty))\n\nClock(gusty, pippa)\n\ntherefore Clock(gusty, pippa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The cordula obviate the editha. The editha miscarry the cordula. If someone miscarry the cordula then the cordula is iodinated. If someone obviate the cordula and they are sixpenny then they see the editha. If someone obviate the editha then they like the cordula. The cordula does not visit the editha.", "logic": "\nObviate(cordula, editha)\nMiscarry(editha, cordula)\nforall x (Miscarry(x, cordula) -> Iodinated(cordula))\nforall x (Obviate(x, cordula) and Sixpenny(x) -> Miscarry(x, editha))\nforall x (Obviate(x, editha) -> Unclog(x, cordula))\n\nnot Obviate(cordula, editha)\n\ntherefore Obviate(cordula, editha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The jillayne spume the donielle. The donielle unitise the jillayne. If someone unitise the jillayne then the jillayne is armless. If someone spume the jillayne and they are beguiled then they see the donielle. If someone spume the donielle then they like the jillayne. The jillayne is armless.", "logic": "\nSpume(jillayne, donielle)\nUnitise(donielle, jillayne)\nforall x (Unitise(x, jillayne) -> Armless(jillayne))\nforall x (Spume(x, jillayne) and Beguiled(x) -> Unitise(x, donielle))\nforall x (Spume(x, donielle) -> Empanel(x, jillayne))\n\nArmless(jillayne)\n\nUnitise(donielle, jillayne) and forall x (Unitise(x, jillayne) -> Armless(jillayne)) -> therefore Armless(jillayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The misha embitter the gretta. The gretta submit the misha. If someone submit the misha then the misha is archaic. If someone embitter the misha and they are submersed then they see the gretta. If someone embitter the gretta then they like the misha. The misha does not like the misha.", "logic": "\nEmbitter(misha, gretta)\nSubmit(gretta, misha)\nforall x (Submit(x, misha) -> Archaic(misha))\nforall x (Embitter(x, misha) and Submersed(x) -> Submit(x, gretta))\nforall x (Embitter(x, gretta) -> Accomplish(x, misha))\n\nnot Accomplish(misha, misha)\n\nEmbitter(misha, gretta) and forall x (Embitter(x, gretta) -> Accomplish(x, misha)) -> therefore Accomplish(misha, misha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The lanni poultice the lothar. The lothar shed the lanni. If someone shed the lanni then the lanni is aboral. If someone poultice the lanni and they are innermost then they see the lothar. If someone poultice the lothar then they like the lanni. The lothar does not see the lothar.", "logic": "\nPoultice(lanni, lothar)\nShed(lothar, lanni)\nforall x (Shed(x, lanni) -> Aboral(lanni))\nforall x (Poultice(x, lanni) and Innermost(x) -> Shed(x, lothar))\nforall x (Poultice(x, lothar) -> Harangue(x, lanni))\n\nnot Shed(lothar, lothar)\n\nforall x (Poultice(x, lanni) and Innermost(x) -> Shed(x, lothar)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The jessika dillydally the shepperd. The shepperd dissipate the jessika. If someone dissipate the jessika then the jessika is onerous. If someone dillydally the jessika and they are utter then they see the shepperd. If someone dillydally the shepperd then they like the jessika. The shepperd preheat the jessika.", "logic": "\nDillydally(jessika, shepperd)\nDissipate(shepperd, jessika)\nforall x (Dissipate(x, jessika) -> Onerous(jessika))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, jessika) and Utter(x) -> Dissipate(x, shepperd))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, shepperd) -> Preheat(x, jessika))\n\nPreheat(shepperd, jessika)\n\nforall x (Dillydally(x, shepperd) -> Preheat(x, jessika)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The gertrud prelude the damaris. The damaris tent the gertrud. If someone tent the gertrud then the gertrud is decadent. If someone prelude the gertrud and they are wild then they see the damaris. If someone prelude the damaris then they like the gertrud. The damaris is not cold.", "logic": "\nPrelude(gertrud, damaris)\nTent(damaris, gertrud)\nforall x (Tent(x, gertrud) -> Decadent(gertrud))\nforall x (Prelude(x, gertrud) and Wild(x) -> Tent(x, damaris))\nforall x (Prelude(x, damaris) -> Dope(x, gertrud))\n\nnot Cold(damaris)\n\nnot Cold(damaris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The maxi uncrate the aron. The aron disarrange the maxi. If someone disarrange the maxi then the maxi is pennate. If someone uncrate the maxi and they are unprompted then they see the aron. If someone uncrate the aron then they like the maxi. The maxi uncrate the maxi.", "logic": "\nUncrate(maxi, aron)\nDisarrange(aron, maxi)\nforall x (Disarrange(x, maxi) -> Pennate(maxi))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, maxi) and Unprompted(x) -> Disarrange(x, aron))\nforall x (Uncrate(x, aron) -> Graph(x, maxi))\n\nUncrate(maxi, maxi)\n\nUncrate(maxi, maxi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2299"} {"premises": "The philbert clear the juliet. The philbert is sarcoid. The juliet clear the philbert. The juliet clear the persis. The juliet is dualistic. The juliet allay the persis. The juliet allay the clinton. The persis is lapidarian. The clinton clear the philbert. The clinton is dualistic. The clinton is rivalrous. The clinton allay the juliet. If someone is lapidarian then they need the philbert. If the persis reclaim the philbert then the persis is rivalrous. If someone reclaim the clinton and they are depressing then the clinton reclaim the juliet. The philbert clear the juliet.", "logic": "\nClear(philbert, juliet)\nSarcoid(philbert)\nClear(juliet, philbert)\nClear(juliet, persis)\nDualistic(juliet)\nAllay(juliet, persis)\nAllay(juliet, clinton)\nLapidarian(persis)\nClear(clinton, philbert)\nDualistic(clinton)\nRivalrous(clinton)\nAllay(clinton, juliet)\nforall x (Lapidarian(x) -> Reclaim(x, philbert))\nReclaim(persis, philbert) -> Rivalrous(persis)\nforall x (Reclaim(x, clinton) and Depressing(x) -> Reclaim(clinton, juliet))\n\nClear(philbert, juliet)\n\ntherefore Clear(philbert, juliet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The brandy trot the norry. The brandy is cxxx. The norry trot the brandy. The norry trot the kirsten. The norry is chummy. The norry vulgarise the kirsten. The norry vulgarise the tanner. The kirsten is isomeric. The tanner trot the brandy. The tanner is chummy. The tanner is ulcerative. The tanner vulgarise the norry. If someone is isomeric then they need the brandy. If the kirsten befriend the brandy then the kirsten is ulcerative. If someone befriend the tanner and they are deboned then the tanner befriend the norry. The tanner does not chase the brandy.", "logic": "\nTrot(brandy, norry)\nCxxx(brandy)\nTrot(norry, brandy)\nTrot(norry, kirsten)\nChummy(norry)\nVulgarise(norry, kirsten)\nVulgarise(norry, tanner)\nIsomeric(kirsten)\nTrot(tanner, brandy)\nChummy(tanner)\nUlcerative(tanner)\nVulgarise(tanner, norry)\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Befriend(x, brandy))\nBefriend(kirsten, brandy) -> Ulcerative(kirsten)\nforall x (Befriend(x, tanner) and Deboned(x) -> Befriend(tanner, norry))\n\nnot Trot(tanner, brandy)\n\ntherefore Trot(tanner, brandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The corissa digitalise the jena. The corissa is fractious. The jena digitalise the corissa. The jena digitalise the aurilia. The jena is bombproof. The jena remind the aurilia. The jena remind the cloris. The aurilia is birken. The cloris digitalise the corissa. The cloris is bombproof. The cloris is untucked. The cloris remind the jena. If someone is birken then they need the corissa. If the aurilia premiss the corissa then the aurilia is untucked. If someone premiss the cloris and they are amphoric then the cloris premiss the jena. The aurilia premiss the corissa.", "logic": "\nDigitalise(corissa, jena)\nFractious(corissa)\nDigitalise(jena, corissa)\nDigitalise(jena, aurilia)\nBombproof(jena)\nRemind(jena, aurilia)\nRemind(jena, cloris)\nBirken(aurilia)\nDigitalise(cloris, corissa)\nBombproof(cloris)\nUntucked(cloris)\nRemind(cloris, jena)\nforall x (Birken(x) -> Premiss(x, corissa))\nPremiss(aurilia, corissa) -> Untucked(aurilia)\nforall x (Premiss(x, cloris) and Amphoric(x) -> Premiss(cloris, jena))\n\nPremiss(aurilia, corissa)\n\nBirken(aurilia) and forall x (Birken(x) -> Premiss(x, corissa)) -> therefore Premiss(aurilia, corissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The libbie select the etti. The libbie is bone. The etti select the libbie. The etti select the ethyl. The etti is through. The etti cavort the ethyl. The etti cavort the rivi. The ethyl is funded. The rivi select the libbie. The rivi is through. The rivi is gregorian. The rivi cavort the etti. If someone is funded then they need the libbie. If the ethyl incite the libbie then the ethyl is gregorian. If someone incite the rivi and they are omniscient then the rivi incite the etti. The ethyl does not need the libbie.", "logic": "\nSelect(libbie, etti)\nBone(libbie)\nSelect(etti, libbie)\nSelect(etti, ethyl)\nThrough(etti)\nCavort(etti, ethyl)\nCavort(etti, rivi)\nFunded(ethyl)\nSelect(rivi, libbie)\nThrough(rivi)\nGregorian(rivi)\nCavort(rivi, etti)\nforall x (Funded(x) -> Incite(x, libbie))\nIncite(ethyl, libbie) -> Gregorian(ethyl)\nforall x (Incite(x, rivi) and Omniscient(x) -> Incite(rivi, etti))\n\nnot Incite(ethyl, libbie)\n\nFunded(ethyl) and forall x (Funded(x) -> Incite(x, libbie)) -> therefore Incite(ethyl, libbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The deloris starch the hanny. The deloris is irenic. The hanny starch the deloris. The hanny starch the robert. The hanny is tinned. The hanny allay the robert. The hanny allay the felicia. The robert is tabby. The felicia starch the deloris. The felicia is tinned. The felicia is adactylous. The felicia allay the hanny. If someone is tabby then they need the deloris. If the robert pace the deloris then the robert is adactylous. If someone pace the felicia and they are wideband then the felicia pace the hanny. The deloris does not need the deloris.", "logic": "\nStarch(deloris, hanny)\nIrenic(deloris)\nStarch(hanny, deloris)\nStarch(hanny, robert)\nTinned(hanny)\nAllay(hanny, robert)\nAllay(hanny, felicia)\nTabby(robert)\nStarch(felicia, deloris)\nTinned(felicia)\nAdactylous(felicia)\nAllay(felicia, hanny)\nforall x (Tabby(x) -> Pace(x, deloris))\nPace(robert, deloris) -> Adactylous(robert)\nforall x (Pace(x, felicia) and Wideband(x) -> Pace(felicia, hanny))\n\nnot Pace(deloris, deloris)\n\nforall x (Tabby(x) -> Pace(x, deloris)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The caresse bugle the merwin. The caresse is speckled. The merwin bugle the caresse. The merwin bugle the maisey. The merwin is ossicular. The merwin ball the maisey. The merwin ball the mignonne. The maisey is exegetical. The mignonne bugle the caresse. The mignonne is ossicular. The mignonne is stoppered. The mignonne ball the merwin. If someone is exegetical then they need the caresse. If the maisey liken the caresse then the maisey is stoppered. If someone liken the mignonne and they are stinky then the mignonne liken the merwin. The mignonne liken the merwin.", "logic": "\nBugle(caresse, merwin)\nSpeckled(caresse)\nBugle(merwin, caresse)\nBugle(merwin, maisey)\nOssicular(merwin)\nBall(merwin, maisey)\nBall(merwin, mignonne)\nExegetical(maisey)\nBugle(mignonne, caresse)\nOssicular(mignonne)\nStoppered(mignonne)\nBall(mignonne, merwin)\nforall x (Exegetical(x) -> Liken(x, caresse))\nLiken(maisey, caresse) -> Stoppered(maisey)\nforall x (Liken(x, mignonne) and Stinky(x) -> Liken(mignonne, merwin))\n\nLiken(mignonne, merwin)\n\nforall x (Liken(x, mignonne) and Stinky(x) -> Liken(mignonne, merwin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The irene lick the andrei. The irene is incessant. The andrei lick the irene. The andrei lick the grace. The andrei is refulgent. The andrei discerp the grace. The andrei discerp the corri. The grace is upbound. The corri lick the irene. The corri is refulgent. The corri is geothermic. The corri discerp the andrei. If someone is upbound then they need the irene. If the grace bombinate the irene then the grace is geothermic. If someone bombinate the corri and they are linnean then the corri bombinate the andrei. The corri does not need the grace.", "logic": "\nLick(irene, andrei)\nIncessant(irene)\nLick(andrei, irene)\nLick(andrei, grace)\nRefulgent(andrei)\nDiscerp(andrei, grace)\nDiscerp(andrei, corri)\nUpbound(grace)\nLick(corri, irene)\nRefulgent(corri)\nGeothermic(corri)\nDiscerp(corri, andrei)\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Bombinate(x, irene))\nBombinate(grace, irene) -> Geothermic(grace)\nforall x (Bombinate(x, corri) and Linnean(x) -> Bombinate(corri, andrei))\n\nnot Bombinate(corri, grace)\n\nnot Bombinate(corri, grace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The leodora refurnish the joellyn. The leodora is unobserved. The joellyn refurnish the leodora. The joellyn refurnish the karee. The joellyn is spinose. The joellyn harden the karee. The joellyn harden the emmett. The karee is achievable. The emmett refurnish the leodora. The emmett is spinose. The emmett is phonemic. The emmett harden the joellyn. If someone is achievable then they need the leodora. If the karee maul the leodora then the karee is phonemic. If someone maul the emmett and they are corinthian then the emmett maul the joellyn. The emmett is unobserved.", "logic": "\nRefurnish(leodora, joellyn)\nUnobserved(leodora)\nRefurnish(joellyn, leodora)\nRefurnish(joellyn, karee)\nSpinose(joellyn)\nHarden(joellyn, karee)\nHarden(joellyn, emmett)\nAchievable(karee)\nRefurnish(emmett, leodora)\nSpinose(emmett)\nPhonemic(emmett)\nHarden(emmett, joellyn)\nforall x (Achievable(x) -> Maul(x, leodora))\nMaul(karee, leodora) -> Phonemic(karee)\nforall x (Maul(x, emmett) and Corinthian(x) -> Maul(emmett, joellyn))\n\nUnobserved(emmett)\n\nUnobserved(emmett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1944"} {"premises": "The nessy suffice the louisa. The louisa suffice the nessy. The alanna remind the louisa. If the louisa remind the nessy then the nessy remind the louisa. If someone recognise the nessy and the nessy is assumed then they are wraithlike. If someone is wraithlike then they chase the nessy. If someone recognise the louisa then the louisa is wraithlike. If the nessy suffice the louisa then the nessy recognise the louisa. If someone recognise the louisa and they need the alanna then the alanna suffice the louisa. The alanna remind the louisa.", "logic": "\nSuffice(nessy, louisa)\nSuffice(louisa, nessy)\nRemind(alanna, louisa)\nRemind(louisa, nessy) -> Remind(nessy, louisa)\nforall x (Recognise(x, nessy) and Assumed(nessy) -> Wraithlike(x))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) -> Recognise(x, nessy))\nforall x (Recognise(x, louisa) -> Wraithlike(louisa))\nSuffice(nessy, louisa) -> Recognise(nessy, louisa)\nforall x (Recognise(x, louisa) and Remind(x, alanna) -> Suffice(alanna, louisa))\n\nRemind(alanna, louisa)\n\ntherefore Remind(alanna, louisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The claribel plonk the mariska. The mariska plonk the claribel. The vance clerk the mariska. If the mariska clerk the claribel then the claribel clerk the mariska. If someone drench the claribel and the claribel is beastly then they are righteous. If someone is righteous then they chase the claribel. If someone drench the mariska then the mariska is righteous. If the claribel plonk the mariska then the claribel drench the mariska. If someone drench the mariska and they need the vance then the vance plonk the mariska. The mariska does not see the claribel.", "logic": "\nPlonk(claribel, mariska)\nPlonk(mariska, claribel)\nClerk(vance, mariska)\nClerk(mariska, claribel) -> Clerk(claribel, mariska)\nforall x (Drench(x, claribel) and Beastly(claribel) -> Righteous(x))\nforall x (Righteous(x) -> Drench(x, claribel))\nforall x (Drench(x, mariska) -> Righteous(mariska))\nPlonk(claribel, mariska) -> Drench(claribel, mariska)\nforall x (Drench(x, mariska) and Clerk(x, vance) -> Plonk(vance, mariska))\n\nnot Plonk(mariska, claribel)\n\ntherefore Plonk(mariska, claribel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The mersey step the shimon. The shimon step the mersey. The jordy superpose the shimon. If the shimon superpose the mersey then the mersey superpose the shimon. If someone reign the mersey and the mersey is branchy then they are nursed. If someone is nursed then they chase the mersey. If someone reign the shimon then the shimon is nursed. If the mersey step the shimon then the mersey reign the shimon. If someone reign the shimon and they need the jordy then the jordy step the shimon. The mersey reign the shimon.", "logic": "\nStep(mersey, shimon)\nStep(shimon, mersey)\nSuperpose(jordy, shimon)\nSuperpose(shimon, mersey) -> Superpose(mersey, shimon)\nforall x (Reign(x, mersey) and Branchy(mersey) -> Nursed(x))\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Reign(x, mersey))\nforall x (Reign(x, shimon) -> Nursed(shimon))\nStep(mersey, shimon) -> Reign(mersey, shimon)\nforall x (Reign(x, shimon) and Superpose(x, jordy) -> Step(jordy, shimon))\n\nReign(mersey, shimon)\n\nStep(mersey, shimon) and Step(mersey, shimon) -> Reign(mersey, shimon) -> therefore Reign(mersey, shimon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The virgie immunize the norm. The norm immunize the virgie. The linzy implore the norm. If the norm implore the virgie then the virgie implore the norm. If someone hill the virgie and the virgie is ordained then they are axile. If someone is axile then they chase the virgie. If someone hill the norm then the norm is axile. If the virgie immunize the norm then the virgie hill the norm. If someone hill the norm and they need the linzy then the linzy immunize the norm. The virgie does not chase the norm.", "logic": "\nImmunize(virgie, norm)\nImmunize(norm, virgie)\nImplore(linzy, norm)\nImplore(norm, virgie) -> Implore(virgie, norm)\nforall x (Hill(x, virgie) and Ordained(virgie) -> Axile(x))\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Hill(x, virgie))\nforall x (Hill(x, norm) -> Axile(norm))\nImmunize(virgie, norm) -> Hill(virgie, norm)\nforall x (Hill(x, norm) and Implore(x, linzy) -> Immunize(linzy, norm))\n\nnot Hill(virgie, norm)\n\nImmunize(virgie, norm) and Immunize(virgie, norm) -> Hill(virgie, norm) -> therefore Hill(virgie, norm)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The benedicta succuss the beale. The beale succuss the benedicta. The roanna theorise the beale. If the beale theorise the benedicta then the benedicta theorise the beale. If someone email the benedicta and the benedicta is desegrated then they are unchaste. If someone is unchaste then they chase the benedicta. If someone email the beale then the beale is unchaste. If the benedicta succuss the beale then the benedicta email the beale. If someone email the beale and they need the roanna then the roanna succuss the beale. The beale is unchaste.", "logic": "\nSuccuss(benedicta, beale)\nSuccuss(beale, benedicta)\nTheorise(roanna, beale)\nTheorise(beale, benedicta) -> Theorise(benedicta, beale)\nforall x (Email(x, benedicta) and Desegrated(benedicta) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Unchaste(x) -> Email(x, benedicta))\nforall x (Email(x, beale) -> Unchaste(beale))\nSuccuss(benedicta, beale) -> Email(benedicta, beale)\nforall x (Email(x, beale) and Theorise(x, roanna) -> Succuss(roanna, beale))\n\nUnchaste(beale)\n\nSuccuss(benedicta, beale) and Succuss(benedicta, beale) -> Email(benedicta, beale) -> therefore Email(benedicta, beale) Email(benedicta, beale) and forall x (Email(x, beale) -> Unchaste(beale)) -> therefore Unchaste(beale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The paddie cancel the lorene. The lorene cancel the paddie. The andrus coruscate the lorene. If the lorene coruscate the paddie then the paddie coruscate the lorene. If someone instal the paddie and the paddie is bulky then they are myelinated. If someone is myelinated then they chase the paddie. If someone instal the lorene then the lorene is myelinated. If the paddie cancel the lorene then the paddie instal the lorene. If someone instal the lorene and they need the andrus then the andrus cancel the lorene. The lorene is not myelinated.", "logic": "\nCancel(paddie, lorene)\nCancel(lorene, paddie)\nCoruscate(andrus, lorene)\nCoruscate(lorene, paddie) -> Coruscate(paddie, lorene)\nforall x (Instal(x, paddie) and Bulky(paddie) -> Myelinated(x))\nforall x (Myelinated(x) -> Instal(x, paddie))\nforall x (Instal(x, lorene) -> Myelinated(lorene))\nCancel(paddie, lorene) -> Instal(paddie, lorene)\nforall x (Instal(x, lorene) and Coruscate(x, andrus) -> Cancel(andrus, lorene))\n\nnot Myelinated(lorene)\n\nCancel(paddie, lorene) and Cancel(paddie, lorene) -> Instal(paddie, lorene) -> therefore Instal(paddie, lorene) Instal(paddie, lorene) and forall x (Instal(x, lorene) -> Myelinated(lorene)) -> therefore Myelinated(lorene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The jyoti progress the othilia. The othilia progress the jyoti. The bonni corset the othilia. If the othilia corset the jyoti then the jyoti corset the othilia. If someone catalog the jyoti and the jyoti is rwandan then they are astigmatic. If someone is astigmatic then they chase the jyoti. If someone catalog the othilia then the othilia is astigmatic. If the jyoti progress the othilia then the jyoti catalog the othilia. If someone catalog the othilia and they need the bonni then the bonni progress the othilia. The othilia catalog the jyoti.", "logic": "\nProgress(jyoti, othilia)\nProgress(othilia, jyoti)\nCorset(bonni, othilia)\nCorset(othilia, jyoti) -> Corset(jyoti, othilia)\nforall x (Catalog(x, jyoti) and Rwandan(jyoti) -> Astigmatic(x))\nforall x (Astigmatic(x) -> Catalog(x, jyoti))\nforall x (Catalog(x, othilia) -> Astigmatic(othilia))\nProgress(jyoti, othilia) -> Catalog(jyoti, othilia)\nforall x (Catalog(x, othilia) and Corset(x, bonni) -> Progress(bonni, othilia))\n\nCatalog(othilia, jyoti)\n\nProgress(jyoti, othilia) and Progress(jyoti, othilia) -> Catalog(jyoti, othilia) -> therefore Catalog(jyoti, othilia) Catalog(jyoti, othilia) and forall x (Catalog(x, othilia) -> Astigmatic(othilia)) -> therefore Astigmatic(othilia) Astigmatic(othilia) and forall x (Astigmatic(x) -> Catalog(x, jyoti)) -> therefore Catalog(othilia, jyoti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The hephzibah prang the fan. The fan prang the hephzibah. The zelda fund the fan. If the fan fund the hephzibah then the hephzibah fund the fan. If someone smirk the hephzibah and the hephzibah is virginal then they are auric. If someone is auric then they chase the hephzibah. If someone smirk the fan then the fan is auric. If the hephzibah prang the fan then the hephzibah smirk the fan. If someone smirk the fan and they need the zelda then the zelda prang the fan. The fan does not chase the hephzibah.", "logic": "\nPrang(hephzibah, fan)\nPrang(fan, hephzibah)\nFund(zelda, fan)\nFund(fan, hephzibah) -> Fund(hephzibah, fan)\nforall x (Smirk(x, hephzibah) and Virginal(hephzibah) -> Auric(x))\nforall x (Auric(x) -> Smirk(x, hephzibah))\nforall x (Smirk(x, fan) -> Auric(fan))\nPrang(hephzibah, fan) -> Smirk(hephzibah, fan)\nforall x (Smirk(x, fan) and Fund(x, zelda) -> Prang(zelda, fan))\n\nnot Smirk(fan, hephzibah)\n\nPrang(hephzibah, fan) and Prang(hephzibah, fan) -> Smirk(hephzibah, fan) -> therefore Smirk(hephzibah, fan) Smirk(hephzibah, fan) and forall x (Smirk(x, fan) -> Auric(fan)) -> therefore Auric(fan) Auric(fan) and forall x (Auric(x) -> Smirk(x, hephzibah)) -> therefore Smirk(fan, hephzibah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The joannes winterise the queenie. The queenie winterise the joannes. The pearl glean the queenie. If the queenie glean the joannes then the joannes glean the queenie. If someone renew the joannes and the joannes is streaming then they are unhappy. If someone is unhappy then they chase the joannes. If someone renew the queenie then the queenie is unhappy. If the joannes winterise the queenie then the joannes renew the queenie. If someone renew the queenie and they need the pearl then the pearl winterise the queenie. The pearl does not chase the joannes.", "logic": "\nWinterise(joannes, queenie)\nWinterise(queenie, joannes)\nGlean(pearl, queenie)\nGlean(queenie, joannes) -> Glean(joannes, queenie)\nforall x (Renew(x, joannes) and Streaming(joannes) -> Unhappy(x))\nforall x (Unhappy(x) -> Renew(x, joannes))\nforall x (Renew(x, queenie) -> Unhappy(queenie))\nWinterise(joannes, queenie) -> Renew(joannes, queenie)\nforall x (Renew(x, queenie) and Glean(x, pearl) -> Winterise(pearl, queenie))\n\nnot Renew(pearl, joannes)\n\nforall x (Unhappy(x) -> Renew(x, joannes)) <- forall x (Renew(x, joannes) and Streaming(joannes) -> Unhappy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The almeda overstress the chariot. The chariot overstress the almeda. The matias sear the chariot. If the chariot sear the almeda then the almeda sear the chariot. If someone date the almeda and the almeda is gloomful then they are lxxi. If someone is lxxi then they chase the almeda. If someone date the chariot then the chariot is lxxi. If the almeda overstress the chariot then the almeda date the chariot. If someone date the chariot and they need the matias then the matias overstress the chariot. The almeda sear the chariot.", "logic": "\nOverstress(almeda, chariot)\nOverstress(chariot, almeda)\nSear(matias, chariot)\nSear(chariot, almeda) -> Sear(almeda, chariot)\nforall x (Date(x, almeda) and Gloomful(almeda) -> Lxxi(x))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) -> Date(x, almeda))\nforall x (Date(x, chariot) -> Lxxi(chariot))\nOverstress(almeda, chariot) -> Date(almeda, chariot)\nforall x (Date(x, chariot) and Sear(x, matias) -> Overstress(matias, chariot))\n\nSear(almeda, chariot)\n\nSear(chariot, almeda) -> Sear(almeda, chariot) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The charleen waggle the jordanna. The jordanna waggle the charleen. The craig simonize the jordanna. If the jordanna simonize the charleen then the charleen simonize the jordanna. If someone border the charleen and the charleen is bushed then they are impudent. If someone is impudent then they chase the charleen. If someone border the jordanna then the jordanna is impudent. If the charleen waggle the jordanna then the charleen border the jordanna. If someone border the jordanna and they need the craig then the craig waggle the jordanna. The charleen does not chase the charleen.", "logic": "\nWaggle(charleen, jordanna)\nWaggle(jordanna, charleen)\nSimonize(craig, jordanna)\nSimonize(jordanna, charleen) -> Simonize(charleen, jordanna)\nforall x (Border(x, charleen) and Bushed(charleen) -> Impudent(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Border(x, charleen))\nforall x (Border(x, jordanna) -> Impudent(jordanna))\nWaggle(charleen, jordanna) -> Border(charleen, jordanna)\nforall x (Border(x, jordanna) and Simonize(x, craig) -> Waggle(craig, jordanna))\n\nnot Border(charleen, charleen)\n\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> Border(x, charleen)) <- forall x (Border(x, charleen) and Bushed(charleen) -> Impudent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The clovis grain the silva. The silva grain the clovis. The benni untwine the silva. If the silva untwine the clovis then the clovis untwine the silva. If someone flow the clovis and the clovis is subject then they are knockdown. If someone is knockdown then they chase the clovis. If someone flow the silva then the silva is knockdown. If the clovis grain the silva then the clovis flow the silva. If someone flow the silva and they need the benni then the benni grain the silva. The clovis is knockdown.", "logic": "\nGrain(clovis, silva)\nGrain(silva, clovis)\nUntwine(benni, silva)\nUntwine(silva, clovis) -> Untwine(clovis, silva)\nforall x (Flow(x, clovis) and Subject(clovis) -> Knockdown(x))\nforall x (Knockdown(x) -> Flow(x, clovis))\nforall x (Flow(x, silva) -> Knockdown(silva))\nGrain(clovis, silva) -> Flow(clovis, silva)\nforall x (Flow(x, silva) and Untwine(x, benni) -> Grain(benni, silva))\n\nKnockdown(clovis)\n\nforall x (Flow(x, clovis) and Subject(clovis) -> Knockdown(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The townie cease the jefry. The jefry cease the townie. The aprilette reseed the jefry. If the jefry reseed the townie then the townie reseed the jefry. If someone misgauge the townie and the townie is upmost then they are releasing. If someone is releasing then they chase the townie. If someone misgauge the jefry then the jefry is releasing. If the townie cease the jefry then the townie misgauge the jefry. If someone misgauge the jefry and they need the aprilette then the aprilette cease the jefry. The jefry is not round.", "logic": "\nCease(townie, jefry)\nCease(jefry, townie)\nReseed(aprilette, jefry)\nReseed(jefry, townie) -> Reseed(townie, jefry)\nforall x (Misgauge(x, townie) and Upmost(townie) -> Releasing(x))\nforall x (Releasing(x) -> Misgauge(x, townie))\nforall x (Misgauge(x, jefry) -> Releasing(jefry))\nCease(townie, jefry) -> Misgauge(townie, jefry)\nforall x (Misgauge(x, jefry) and Reseed(x, aprilette) -> Cease(aprilette, jefry))\n\nnot Round(jefry)\n\nnot Round(jefry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The hamel pucker the ardene. The ardene pucker the hamel. The moria reticulate the ardene. If the ardene reticulate the hamel then the hamel reticulate the ardene. If someone undergrow the hamel and the hamel is lateen then they are british. If someone is british then they chase the hamel. If someone undergrow the ardene then the ardene is british. If the hamel pucker the ardene then the hamel undergrow the ardene. If someone undergrow the ardene and they need the moria then the moria pucker the ardene. The ardene reticulate the ardene.", "logic": "\nPucker(hamel, ardene)\nPucker(ardene, hamel)\nReticulate(moria, ardene)\nReticulate(ardene, hamel) -> Reticulate(hamel, ardene)\nforall x (Undergrow(x, hamel) and Lateen(hamel) -> British(x))\nforall x (British(x) -> Undergrow(x, hamel))\nforall x (Undergrow(x, ardene) -> British(ardene))\nPucker(hamel, ardene) -> Undergrow(hamel, ardene)\nforall x (Undergrow(x, ardene) and Reticulate(x, moria) -> Pucker(moria, ardene))\n\nReticulate(ardene, ardene)\n\nReticulate(ardene, ardene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The sophi blabber the gabriell. The gabriell blabber the sophi. The windham uniformize the gabriell. If the gabriell uniformize the sophi then the sophi uniformize the gabriell. If someone misalign the sophi and the sophi is uninformed then they are estuarial. If someone is estuarial then they chase the sophi. If someone misalign the gabriell then the gabriell is estuarial. If the sophi blabber the gabriell then the sophi misalign the gabriell. If someone misalign the gabriell and they need the windham then the windham blabber the gabriell. The gabriell does not see the windham.", "logic": "\nBlabber(sophi, gabriell)\nBlabber(gabriell, sophi)\nUniformize(windham, gabriell)\nUniformize(gabriell, sophi) -> Uniformize(sophi, gabriell)\nforall x (Misalign(x, sophi) and Uninformed(sophi) -> Estuarial(x))\nforall x (Estuarial(x) -> Misalign(x, sophi))\nforall x (Misalign(x, gabriell) -> Estuarial(gabriell))\nBlabber(sophi, gabriell) -> Misalign(sophi, gabriell)\nforall x (Misalign(x, gabriell) and Uniformize(x, windham) -> Blabber(windham, gabriell))\n\nnot Blabber(gabriell, windham)\n\nnot Blabber(gabriell, windham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The bartel colorise the hervey. The hervey colorise the bartel. The garfinkel palter the hervey. If the hervey palter the bartel then the bartel palter the hervey. If someone impel the bartel and the bartel is robotic then they are aphakic. If someone is aphakic then they chase the bartel. If someone impel the hervey then the hervey is aphakic. If the bartel colorise the hervey then the bartel impel the hervey. If someone impel the hervey and they need the garfinkel then the garfinkel colorise the hervey. The bartel colorise the garfinkel.", "logic": "\nColorise(bartel, hervey)\nColorise(hervey, bartel)\nPalter(garfinkel, hervey)\nPalter(hervey, bartel) -> Palter(bartel, hervey)\nforall x (Impel(x, bartel) and Robotic(bartel) -> Aphakic(x))\nforall x (Aphakic(x) -> Impel(x, bartel))\nforall x (Impel(x, hervey) -> Aphakic(hervey))\nColorise(bartel, hervey) -> Impel(bartel, hervey)\nforall x (Impel(x, hervey) and Palter(x, garfinkel) -> Colorise(garfinkel, hervey))\n\nColorise(bartel, garfinkel)\n\nColorise(bartel, garfinkel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1027"} {"premises": "The manfred is not diffuse. The manfred neglect the mitchell. The barth patronise the nataline. The barth is not diffuse. The mitchell does not need the manfred. The nataline is not unequal. The nataline shipwreck the barth. If the barth neglect the manfred then the manfred does not visit the nataline. If someone neglect the mitchell and they are unequal then the mitchell is plucked. If someone shipwreck the mitchell then they need the manfred. If someone shipwreck the barth then they need the nataline. If someone patronise the nataline then the nataline is plucked. If the barth patronise the nataline then the barth shipwreck the mitchell. The mitchell does not need the manfred.", "logic": "\nnot Diffuse(manfred)\nNeglect(manfred, mitchell)\nPatronise(barth, nataline)\nnot Diffuse(barth)\nnot Neglect(mitchell, manfred)\nnot Unequal(nataline)\nShipwreck(nataline, barth)\nNeglect(barth, manfred) -> not Shipwreck(manfred, nataline)\nforall x (Neglect(x, mitchell) and Unequal(x) -> Plucked(mitchell))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, mitchell) -> Neglect(x, manfred))\nforall x (Shipwreck(x, barth) -> Neglect(x, nataline))\nforall x (Patronise(x, nataline) -> Plucked(nataline))\nPatronise(barth, nataline) -> Shipwreck(barth, mitchell)\n\nnot Neglect(mitchell, manfred)\n\ntherefore not Neglect(mitchell, manfred)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The les is not collegial. The les slime the adelaide. The gallagher parade the goose. The gallagher is not collegial. The adelaide does not need the les. The goose is not misrelated. The goose coal the gallagher. If the gallagher slime the les then the les does not visit the goose. If someone slime the adelaide and they are misrelated then the adelaide is belted. If someone coal the adelaide then they need the les. If someone coal the gallagher then they need the goose. If someone parade the goose then the goose is belted. If the gallagher parade the goose then the gallagher coal the adelaide. The gallagher is collegial.", "logic": "\nnot Collegial(les)\nSlime(les, adelaide)\nParade(gallagher, goose)\nnot Collegial(gallagher)\nnot Slime(adelaide, les)\nnot Misrelated(goose)\nCoal(goose, gallagher)\nSlime(gallagher, les) -> not Coal(les, goose)\nforall x (Slime(x, adelaide) and Misrelated(x) -> Belted(adelaide))\nforall x (Coal(x, adelaide) -> Slime(x, les))\nforall x (Coal(x, gallagher) -> Slime(x, goose))\nforall x (Parade(x, goose) -> Belted(goose))\nParade(gallagher, goose) -> Coal(gallagher, adelaide)\n\nCollegial(gallagher)\n\ntherefore not Collegial(gallagher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The charlton is not migrant. The charlton recap the jacquelyn. The irma perfume the royce. The irma is not migrant. The jacquelyn does not need the charlton. The royce is not blond. The royce embalm the irma. If the irma recap the charlton then the charlton does not visit the royce. If someone recap the jacquelyn and they are blond then the jacquelyn is podgy. If someone embalm the jacquelyn then they need the charlton. If someone embalm the irma then they need the royce. If someone perfume the royce then the royce is podgy. If the irma perfume the royce then the irma embalm the jacquelyn. The royce recap the royce.", "logic": "\nnot Migrant(charlton)\nRecap(charlton, jacquelyn)\nPerfume(irma, royce)\nnot Migrant(irma)\nnot Recap(jacquelyn, charlton)\nnot Blond(royce)\nEmbalm(royce, irma)\nRecap(irma, charlton) -> not Embalm(charlton, royce)\nforall x (Recap(x, jacquelyn) and Blond(x) -> Podgy(jacquelyn))\nforall x (Embalm(x, jacquelyn) -> Recap(x, charlton))\nforall x (Embalm(x, irma) -> Recap(x, royce))\nforall x (Perfume(x, royce) -> Podgy(royce))\nPerfume(irma, royce) -> Embalm(irma, jacquelyn)\n\nRecap(royce, royce)\n\nEmbalm(royce, irma) and forall x (Embalm(x, irma) -> Recap(x, royce)) -> therefore Recap(royce, royce)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The raquela is not kosher. The raquela hydrolise the faydra. The muriel agitate the allie. The muriel is not kosher. The faydra does not need the raquela. The allie is not ninth. The allie edge the muriel. If the muriel hydrolise the raquela then the raquela does not visit the allie. If someone hydrolise the faydra and they are ninth then the faydra is impudent. If someone edge the faydra then they need the raquela. If someone edge the muriel then they need the allie. If someone agitate the allie then the allie is impudent. If the muriel agitate the allie then the muriel edge the faydra. The allie does not need the allie.", "logic": "\nnot Kosher(raquela)\nHydrolise(raquela, faydra)\nAgitate(muriel, allie)\nnot Kosher(muriel)\nnot Hydrolise(faydra, raquela)\nnot Ninth(allie)\nEdge(allie, muriel)\nHydrolise(muriel, raquela) -> not Edge(raquela, allie)\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, faydra) and Ninth(x) -> Impudent(faydra))\nforall x (Edge(x, faydra) -> Hydrolise(x, raquela))\nforall x (Edge(x, muriel) -> Hydrolise(x, allie))\nforall x (Agitate(x, allie) -> Impudent(allie))\nAgitate(muriel, allie) -> Edge(muriel, faydra)\n\nnot Hydrolise(allie, allie)\n\nEdge(allie, muriel) and forall x (Edge(x, muriel) -> Hydrolise(x, allie)) -> therefore Hydrolise(allie, allie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The saw is not neurogenic. The saw blarney the stefano. The dino palter the thelma. The dino is not neurogenic. The stefano does not need the saw. The thelma is not propellent. The thelma dissever the dino. If the dino blarney the saw then the saw does not visit the thelma. If someone blarney the stefano and they are propellent then the stefano is mechanical. If someone dissever the stefano then they need the saw. If someone dissever the dino then they need the thelma. If someone palter the thelma then the thelma is mechanical. If the dino palter the thelma then the dino dissever the stefano. The dino blarney the saw.", "logic": "\nnot Neurogenic(saw)\nBlarney(saw, stefano)\nPalter(dino, thelma)\nnot Neurogenic(dino)\nnot Blarney(stefano, saw)\nnot Propellent(thelma)\nDissever(thelma, dino)\nBlarney(dino, saw) -> not Dissever(saw, thelma)\nforall x (Blarney(x, stefano) and Propellent(x) -> Mechanical(stefano))\nforall x (Dissever(x, stefano) -> Blarney(x, saw))\nforall x (Dissever(x, dino) -> Blarney(x, thelma))\nforall x (Palter(x, thelma) -> Mechanical(thelma))\nPalter(dino, thelma) -> Dissever(dino, stefano)\n\nBlarney(dino, saw)\n\nPalter(dino, thelma) and Palter(dino, thelma) -> Dissever(dino, stefano) -> therefore Dissever(dino, stefano) Dissever(dino, stefano) and forall x (Dissever(x, stefano) -> Blarney(x, saw)) -> therefore Blarney(dino, saw)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The theodor is not eradicable. The theodor extradite the harlie. The benni drool the aleta. The benni is not eradicable. The harlie does not need the theodor. The aleta is not owlish. The aleta reproduce the benni. If the benni extradite the theodor then the theodor does not visit the aleta. If someone extradite the harlie and they are owlish then the harlie is impellent. If someone reproduce the harlie then they need the theodor. If someone reproduce the benni then they need the aleta. If someone drool the aleta then the aleta is impellent. If the benni drool the aleta then the benni reproduce the harlie. The benni does not need the theodor.", "logic": "\nnot Eradicable(theodor)\nExtradite(theodor, harlie)\nDrool(benni, aleta)\nnot Eradicable(benni)\nnot Extradite(harlie, theodor)\nnot Owlish(aleta)\nReproduce(aleta, benni)\nExtradite(benni, theodor) -> not Reproduce(theodor, aleta)\nforall x (Extradite(x, harlie) and Owlish(x) -> Impellent(harlie))\nforall x (Reproduce(x, harlie) -> Extradite(x, theodor))\nforall x (Reproduce(x, benni) -> Extradite(x, aleta))\nforall x (Drool(x, aleta) -> Impellent(aleta))\nDrool(benni, aleta) -> Reproduce(benni, harlie)\n\nnot Extradite(benni, theodor)\n\nDrool(benni, aleta) and Drool(benni, aleta) -> Reproduce(benni, harlie) -> therefore Reproduce(benni, harlie) Reproduce(benni, harlie) and forall x (Reproduce(x, harlie) -> Extradite(x, theodor)) -> therefore Extradite(benni, theodor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The indira is not nuclear. The indira microfilm the catherina. The darryl relinquish the willyt. The darryl is not nuclear. The catherina does not need the indira. The willyt is not callable. The willyt necrose the darryl. If the darryl microfilm the indira then the indira does not visit the willyt. If someone microfilm the catherina and they are callable then the catherina is husbandly. If someone necrose the catherina then they need the indira. If someone necrose the darryl then they need the willyt. If someone relinquish the willyt then the willyt is husbandly. If the darryl relinquish the willyt then the darryl necrose the catherina. The indira does not visit the willyt.", "logic": "\nnot Nuclear(indira)\nMicrofilm(indira, catherina)\nRelinquish(darryl, willyt)\nnot Nuclear(darryl)\nnot Microfilm(catherina, indira)\nnot Callable(willyt)\nNecrose(willyt, darryl)\nMicrofilm(darryl, indira) -> not Necrose(indira, willyt)\nforall x (Microfilm(x, catherina) and Callable(x) -> Husbandly(catherina))\nforall x (Necrose(x, catherina) -> Microfilm(x, indira))\nforall x (Necrose(x, darryl) -> Microfilm(x, willyt))\nforall x (Relinquish(x, willyt) -> Husbandly(willyt))\nRelinquish(darryl, willyt) -> Necrose(darryl, catherina)\n\nnot Necrose(indira, willyt)\n\nRelinquish(darryl, willyt) and Relinquish(darryl, willyt) -> Necrose(darryl, catherina) -> therefore Necrose(darryl, catherina) Necrose(darryl, catherina) and forall x (Necrose(x, catherina) -> Microfilm(x, indira)) -> therefore Microfilm(darryl, indira) Microfilm(darryl, indira) and Microfilm(darryl, indira) -> not Necrose(indira, willyt) -> therefore not Necrose(indira, willyt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The pam is not jolty. The pam trespass the camila. The joelle explicate the mary. The joelle is not jolty. The camila does not need the pam. The mary is not unpromised. The mary ensure the joelle. If the joelle trespass the pam then the pam does not visit the mary. If someone trespass the camila and they are unpromised then the camila is recurring. If someone ensure the camila then they need the pam. If someone ensure the joelle then they need the mary. If someone explicate the mary then the mary is recurring. If the joelle explicate the mary then the joelle ensure the camila. The pam ensure the mary.", "logic": "\nnot Jolty(pam)\nTrespass(pam, camila)\nExplicate(joelle, mary)\nnot Jolty(joelle)\nnot Trespass(camila, pam)\nnot Unpromised(mary)\nEnsure(mary, joelle)\nTrespass(joelle, pam) -> not Ensure(pam, mary)\nforall x (Trespass(x, camila) and Unpromised(x) -> Recurring(camila))\nforall x (Ensure(x, camila) -> Trespass(x, pam))\nforall x (Ensure(x, joelle) -> Trespass(x, mary))\nforall x (Explicate(x, mary) -> Recurring(mary))\nExplicate(joelle, mary) -> Ensure(joelle, camila)\n\nEnsure(pam, mary)\n\nExplicate(joelle, mary) and Explicate(joelle, mary) -> Ensure(joelle, camila) -> therefore Ensure(joelle, camila) Ensure(joelle, camila) and forall x (Ensure(x, camila) -> Trespass(x, pam)) -> therefore Trespass(joelle, pam) Trespass(joelle, pam) and Trespass(joelle, pam) -> not Ensure(pam, mary) -> therefore not Ensure(pam, mary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The russel is not campanular. The russel plummet the natalie. The jessy oink the katlin. The jessy is not campanular. The natalie does not need the russel. The katlin is not elect. The katlin rubify the jessy. If the jessy plummet the russel then the russel does not visit the katlin. If someone plummet the natalie and they are elect then the natalie is smokeless. If someone rubify the natalie then they need the russel. If someone rubify the jessy then they need the katlin. If someone oink the katlin then the katlin is smokeless. If the jessy oink the katlin then the jessy rubify the natalie. The russel does not need the katlin.", "logic": "\nnot Campanular(russel)\nPlummet(russel, natalie)\nOink(jessy, katlin)\nnot Campanular(jessy)\nnot Plummet(natalie, russel)\nnot Elect(katlin)\nRubify(katlin, jessy)\nPlummet(jessy, russel) -> not Rubify(russel, katlin)\nforall x (Plummet(x, natalie) and Elect(x) -> Smokeless(natalie))\nforall x (Rubify(x, natalie) -> Plummet(x, russel))\nforall x (Rubify(x, jessy) -> Plummet(x, katlin))\nforall x (Oink(x, katlin) -> Smokeless(katlin))\nOink(jessy, katlin) -> Rubify(jessy, natalie)\n\nnot Plummet(russel, katlin)\n\nforall x (Rubify(x, jessy) -> Plummet(x, katlin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The klarika is not groundless. The klarika heighten the flem. The alleen racketeer the bendite. The alleen is not groundless. The flem does not need the klarika. The bendite is not beguiling. The bendite redesign the alleen. If the alleen heighten the klarika then the klarika does not visit the bendite. If someone heighten the flem and they are beguiling then the flem is advisory. If someone redesign the flem then they need the klarika. If someone redesign the alleen then they need the bendite. If someone racketeer the bendite then the bendite is advisory. If the alleen racketeer the bendite then the alleen redesign the flem. The bendite heighten the klarika.", "logic": "\nnot Groundless(klarika)\nHeighten(klarika, flem)\nRacketeer(alleen, bendite)\nnot Groundless(alleen)\nnot Heighten(flem, klarika)\nnot Beguiling(bendite)\nRedesign(bendite, alleen)\nHeighten(alleen, klarika) -> not Redesign(klarika, bendite)\nforall x (Heighten(x, flem) and Beguiling(x) -> Advisory(flem))\nforall x (Redesign(x, flem) -> Heighten(x, klarika))\nforall x (Redesign(x, alleen) -> Heighten(x, bendite))\nforall x (Racketeer(x, bendite) -> Advisory(bendite))\nRacketeer(alleen, bendite) -> Redesign(alleen, flem)\n\nHeighten(bendite, klarika)\n\nforall x (Redesign(x, flem) -> Heighten(x, klarika)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The raynell is not dorsal. The raynell paddle the barry. The rosalind soothe the candis. The rosalind is not dorsal. The barry does not need the raynell. The candis is not drab. The candis chock the rosalind. If the rosalind paddle the raynell then the raynell does not visit the candis. If someone paddle the barry and they are drab then the barry is carbonic. If someone chock the barry then they need the raynell. If someone chock the rosalind then they need the candis. If someone soothe the candis then the candis is carbonic. If the rosalind soothe the candis then the rosalind chock the barry. The barry is not carbonic.", "logic": "\nnot Dorsal(raynell)\nPaddle(raynell, barry)\nSoothe(rosalind, candis)\nnot Dorsal(rosalind)\nnot Paddle(barry, raynell)\nnot Drab(candis)\nChock(candis, rosalind)\nPaddle(rosalind, raynell) -> not Chock(raynell, candis)\nforall x (Paddle(x, barry) and Drab(x) -> Carbonic(barry))\nforall x (Chock(x, barry) -> Paddle(x, raynell))\nforall x (Chock(x, rosalind) -> Paddle(x, candis))\nforall x (Soothe(x, candis) -> Carbonic(candis))\nSoothe(rosalind, candis) -> Chock(rosalind, barry)\n\nnot Carbonic(barry)\n\nforall x (Paddle(x, barry) and Drab(x) -> Carbonic(barry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The ailina is not mustached. The ailina germinate the russel. The rosalyn hoard the debora. The rosalyn is not mustached. The russel does not need the ailina. The debora is not ivied. The debora bail the rosalyn. If the rosalyn germinate the ailina then the ailina does not visit the debora. If someone germinate the russel and they are ivied then the russel is shakeable. If someone bail the russel then they need the ailina. If someone bail the rosalyn then they need the debora. If someone hoard the debora then the debora is shakeable. If the rosalyn hoard the debora then the rosalyn bail the russel. The russel germinate the debora.", "logic": "\nnot Mustached(ailina)\nGerminate(ailina, russel)\nHoard(rosalyn, debora)\nnot Mustached(rosalyn)\nnot Germinate(russel, ailina)\nnot Ivied(debora)\nBail(debora, rosalyn)\nGerminate(rosalyn, ailina) -> not Bail(ailina, debora)\nforall x (Germinate(x, russel) and Ivied(x) -> Shakeable(russel))\nforall x (Bail(x, russel) -> Germinate(x, ailina))\nforall x (Bail(x, rosalyn) -> Germinate(x, debora))\nforall x (Hoard(x, debora) -> Shakeable(debora))\nHoard(rosalyn, debora) -> Bail(rosalyn, russel)\n\nGerminate(russel, debora)\n\nforall x (Bail(x, rosalyn) -> Germinate(x, debora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The case is not aflare. The case novelize the rheta. The urbano defecate the evie. The urbano is not aflare. The rheta does not need the case. The evie is not dyspnoeal. The evie drum the urbano. If the urbano novelize the case then the case does not visit the evie. If someone novelize the rheta and they are dyspnoeal then the rheta is traitorous. If someone drum the rheta then they need the case. If someone drum the urbano then they need the evie. If someone defecate the evie then the evie is traitorous. If the urbano defecate the evie then the urbano drum the rheta. The evie is not aflare.", "logic": "\nnot Aflare(case)\nNovelize(case, rheta)\nDefecate(urbano, evie)\nnot Aflare(urbano)\nnot Novelize(rheta, case)\nnot Dyspnoeal(evie)\nDrum(evie, urbano)\nNovelize(urbano, case) -> not Drum(case, evie)\nforall x (Novelize(x, rheta) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> Traitorous(rheta))\nforall x (Drum(x, rheta) -> Novelize(x, case))\nforall x (Drum(x, urbano) -> Novelize(x, evie))\nforall x (Defecate(x, evie) -> Traitorous(evie))\nDefecate(urbano, evie) -> Drum(urbano, rheta)\n\nnot Aflare(evie)\n\nnot Aflare(evie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The cathy is not warlike. The cathy ablactate the ninon. The inez jelly the mommy. The inez is not warlike. The ninon does not need the cathy. The mommy is not setose. The mommy escallop the inez. If the inez ablactate the cathy then the cathy does not visit the mommy. If someone ablactate the ninon and they are setose then the ninon is instant. If someone escallop the ninon then they need the cathy. If someone escallop the inez then they need the mommy. If someone jelly the mommy then the mommy is instant. If the inez jelly the mommy then the inez escallop the ninon. The mommy escallop the ninon.", "logic": "\nnot Warlike(cathy)\nAblactate(cathy, ninon)\nJelly(inez, mommy)\nnot Warlike(inez)\nnot Ablactate(ninon, cathy)\nnot Setose(mommy)\nEscallop(mommy, inez)\nAblactate(inez, cathy) -> not Escallop(cathy, mommy)\nforall x (Ablactate(x, ninon) and Setose(x) -> Instant(ninon))\nforall x (Escallop(x, ninon) -> Ablactate(x, cathy))\nforall x (Escallop(x, inez) -> Ablactate(x, mommy))\nforall x (Jelly(x, mommy) -> Instant(mommy))\nJelly(inez, mommy) -> Escallop(inez, ninon)\n\nEscallop(mommy, ninon)\n\nEscallop(mommy, ninon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The christyna is not underslung. The christyna scald the terrel. The annabelle decouple the remington. The annabelle is not underslung. The terrel does not need the christyna. The remington is not statant. The remington effect the annabelle. If the annabelle scald the christyna then the christyna does not visit the remington. If someone scald the terrel and they are statant then the terrel is actinoid. If someone effect the terrel then they need the christyna. If someone effect the annabelle then they need the remington. If someone decouple the remington then the remington is actinoid. If the annabelle decouple the remington then the annabelle effect the terrel. The christyna is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Underslung(christyna)\nScald(christyna, terrel)\nDecouple(annabelle, remington)\nnot Underslung(annabelle)\nnot Scald(terrel, christyna)\nnot Statant(remington)\nEffect(remington, annabelle)\nScald(annabelle, christyna) -> not Effect(christyna, remington)\nforall x (Scald(x, terrel) and Statant(x) -> Actinoid(terrel))\nforall x (Effect(x, terrel) -> Scald(x, christyna))\nforall x (Effect(x, annabelle) -> Scald(x, remington))\nforall x (Decouple(x, remington) -> Actinoid(remington))\nDecouple(annabelle, remington) -> Effect(annabelle, terrel)\n\nnot Round(christyna)\n\nnot Round(christyna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The etienne is not abomasal. The etienne afflict the adolfo. The fortuna curl the osmond. The fortuna is not abomasal. The adolfo does not need the etienne. The osmond is not dutch. The osmond eternise the fortuna. If the fortuna afflict the etienne then the etienne does not visit the osmond. If someone afflict the adolfo and they are dutch then the adolfo is wrothful. If someone eternise the adolfo then they need the etienne. If someone eternise the fortuna then they need the osmond. If someone curl the osmond then the osmond is wrothful. If the fortuna curl the osmond then the fortuna eternise the adolfo. The osmond curl the fortuna.", "logic": "\nnot Abomasal(etienne)\nAfflict(etienne, adolfo)\nCurl(fortuna, osmond)\nnot Abomasal(fortuna)\nnot Afflict(adolfo, etienne)\nnot Dutch(osmond)\nEternise(osmond, fortuna)\nAfflict(fortuna, etienne) -> not Eternise(etienne, osmond)\nforall x (Afflict(x, adolfo) and Dutch(x) -> Wrothful(adolfo))\nforall x (Eternise(x, adolfo) -> Afflict(x, etienne))\nforall x (Eternise(x, fortuna) -> Afflict(x, osmond))\nforall x (Curl(x, osmond) -> Wrothful(osmond))\nCurl(fortuna, osmond) -> Eternise(fortuna, adolfo)\n\nCurl(osmond, fortuna)\n\nCurl(osmond, fortuna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-517"} {"premises": "The maurita is laid. The norris bushel the maurita. The zonnya yank the elizabeth. The elizabeth is insincere. If someone pardon the zonnya and they are amendable then the zonnya bushel the maurita. If someone is laid then they like the maurita. If someone is laid then they like the norris. If someone yank the maurita then the maurita bushel the norris. If the elizabeth bushel the maurita then the maurita is unfastened. If someone pardon the elizabeth and they are unfastened then they visit the zonnya. The elizabeth is insincere.", "logic": "\nLaid(maurita)\nBushel(norris, maurita)\nYank(zonnya, elizabeth)\nInsincere(elizabeth)\nforall x (Pardon(x, zonnya) and Amendable(x) -> Bushel(zonnya, maurita))\nforall x (Laid(x) -> Yank(x, maurita))\nforall x (Laid(x) -> Yank(x, norris))\nforall x (Yank(x, maurita) -> Bushel(maurita, norris))\nBushel(elizabeth, maurita) -> Unfastened(maurita)\nforall x (Pardon(x, elizabeth) and Unfastened(x) -> Bushel(x, zonnya))\n\nInsincere(elizabeth)\n\ntherefore Insincere(elizabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The ware is imputable. The samuel boom the ware. The lavinie cavil the dickie. The dickie is whiskery. If someone acquire the lavinie and they are prurient then the lavinie boom the ware. If someone is imputable then they like the ware. If someone is imputable then they like the samuel. If someone cavil the ware then the ware boom the samuel. If the dickie boom the ware then the ware is calendric. If someone acquire the dickie and they are calendric then they visit the lavinie. The dickie is not whiskery.", "logic": "\nImputable(ware)\nBoom(samuel, ware)\nCavil(lavinie, dickie)\nWhiskery(dickie)\nforall x (Acquire(x, lavinie) and Prurient(x) -> Boom(lavinie, ware))\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> Cavil(x, ware))\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> Cavil(x, samuel))\nforall x (Cavil(x, ware) -> Boom(ware, samuel))\nBoom(dickie, ware) -> Calendric(ware)\nforall x (Acquire(x, dickie) and Calendric(x) -> Boom(x, lavinie))\n\nnot Whiskery(dickie)\n\ntherefore Whiskery(dickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The gabbie is mucoid. The janela mesh the gabbie. The norm trammel the joy. The joy is grumous. If someone pearl the norm and they are cheliceral then the norm mesh the gabbie. If someone is mucoid then they like the gabbie. If someone is mucoid then they like the janela. If someone trammel the gabbie then the gabbie mesh the janela. If the joy mesh the gabbie then the gabbie is septal. If someone pearl the joy and they are septal then they visit the norm. The gabbie trammel the gabbie.", "logic": "\nMucoid(gabbie)\nMesh(janela, gabbie)\nTrammel(norm, joy)\nGrumous(joy)\nforall x (Pearl(x, norm) and Cheliceral(x) -> Mesh(norm, gabbie))\nforall x (Mucoid(x) -> Trammel(x, gabbie))\nforall x (Mucoid(x) -> Trammel(x, janela))\nforall x (Trammel(x, gabbie) -> Mesh(gabbie, janela))\nMesh(joy, gabbie) -> Septal(gabbie)\nforall x (Pearl(x, joy) and Septal(x) -> Mesh(x, norm))\n\nTrammel(gabbie, gabbie)\n\nMucoid(gabbie) and forall x (Mucoid(x) -> Trammel(x, gabbie)) -> therefore Trammel(gabbie, gabbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The odessa is dolabrate. The tresa monopolise the odessa. The judy chortle the nata. The nata is quaternary. If someone curry the judy and they are tubby then the judy monopolise the odessa. If someone is dolabrate then they like the odessa. If someone is dolabrate then they like the tresa. If someone chortle the odessa then the odessa monopolise the tresa. If the nata monopolise the odessa then the odessa is uncovered. If someone curry the nata and they are uncovered then they visit the judy. The odessa does not like the odessa.", "logic": "\nDolabrate(odessa)\nMonopolise(tresa, odessa)\nChortle(judy, nata)\nQuaternary(nata)\nforall x (Curry(x, judy) and Tubby(x) -> Monopolise(judy, odessa))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Chortle(x, odessa))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Chortle(x, tresa))\nforall x (Chortle(x, odessa) -> Monopolise(odessa, tresa))\nMonopolise(nata, odessa) -> Uncovered(odessa)\nforall x (Curry(x, nata) and Uncovered(x) -> Monopolise(x, judy))\n\nnot Chortle(odessa, odessa)\n\nDolabrate(odessa) and forall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Chortle(x, odessa)) -> therefore Chortle(odessa, odessa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The cristin is stomatal. The marcio metricate the cristin. The zerk melanise the aloysius. The aloysius is wandering. If someone canonise the zerk and they are smaller then the zerk metricate the cristin. If someone is stomatal then they like the cristin. If someone is stomatal then they like the marcio. If someone melanise the cristin then the cristin metricate the marcio. If the aloysius metricate the cristin then the cristin is perturbing. If someone canonise the aloysius and they are perturbing then they visit the zerk. The cristin metricate the marcio.", "logic": "\nStomatal(cristin)\nMetricate(marcio, cristin)\nMelanise(zerk, aloysius)\nWandering(aloysius)\nforall x (Canonise(x, zerk) and Smaller(x) -> Metricate(zerk, cristin))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> Melanise(x, cristin))\nforall x (Stomatal(x) -> Melanise(x, marcio))\nforall x (Melanise(x, cristin) -> Metricate(cristin, marcio))\nMetricate(aloysius, cristin) -> Perturbing(cristin)\nforall x (Canonise(x, aloysius) and Perturbing(x) -> Metricate(x, zerk))\n\nMetricate(cristin, marcio)\n\nStomatal(cristin) and forall x (Stomatal(x) -> Melanise(x, cristin)) -> therefore Melanise(cristin, cristin) Melanise(cristin, cristin) and forall x (Melanise(x, cristin) -> Metricate(cristin, marcio)) -> therefore Metricate(cristin, marcio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The oswell is looseleaf. The saraann theorise the oswell. The katerina finagle the bianka. The bianka is obese. If someone strap the katerina and they are overaged then the katerina theorise the oswell. If someone is looseleaf then they like the oswell. If someone is looseleaf then they like the saraann. If someone finagle the oswell then the oswell theorise the saraann. If the bianka theorise the oswell then the oswell is wavy. If someone strap the bianka and they are wavy then they visit the katerina. The oswell does not visit the saraann.", "logic": "\nLooseleaf(oswell)\nTheorise(saraann, oswell)\nFinagle(katerina, bianka)\nObese(bianka)\nforall x (Strap(x, katerina) and Overaged(x) -> Theorise(katerina, oswell))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Finagle(x, oswell))\nforall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Finagle(x, saraann))\nforall x (Finagle(x, oswell) -> Theorise(oswell, saraann))\nTheorise(bianka, oswell) -> Wavy(oswell)\nforall x (Strap(x, bianka) and Wavy(x) -> Theorise(x, katerina))\n\nnot Theorise(oswell, saraann)\n\nLooseleaf(oswell) and forall x (Looseleaf(x) -> Finagle(x, oswell)) -> therefore Finagle(oswell, oswell) Finagle(oswell, oswell) and forall x (Finagle(x, oswell) -> Theorise(oswell, saraann)) -> therefore Theorise(oswell, saraann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The rodolph is ignorant. The berte cower the rodolph. The linoel reawaken the barton. The barton is slick. If someone surfeit the linoel and they are lacy then the linoel cower the rodolph. If someone is ignorant then they like the rodolph. If someone is ignorant then they like the berte. If someone reawaken the rodolph then the rodolph cower the berte. If the barton cower the rodolph then the rodolph is absorptive. If someone surfeit the barton and they are absorptive then they visit the linoel. The berte does not like the berte.", "logic": "\nIgnorant(rodolph)\nCower(berte, rodolph)\nReawaken(linoel, barton)\nSlick(barton)\nforall x (Surfeit(x, linoel) and Lacy(x) -> Cower(linoel, rodolph))\nforall x (Ignorant(x) -> Reawaken(x, rodolph))\nforall x (Ignorant(x) -> Reawaken(x, berte))\nforall x (Reawaken(x, rodolph) -> Cower(rodolph, berte))\nCower(barton, rodolph) -> Absorptive(rodolph)\nforall x (Surfeit(x, barton) and Absorptive(x) -> Cower(x, linoel))\n\nnot Reawaken(berte, berte)\n\nforall x (Ignorant(x) -> Reawaken(x, berte)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The kingsly is eellike. The emmott metabolize the kingsly. The benedicta fluoresce the jody. The jody is insolent. If someone mill the benedicta and they are casteless then the benedicta metabolize the kingsly. If someone is eellike then they like the kingsly. If someone is eellike then they like the emmott. If someone fluoresce the kingsly then the kingsly metabolize the emmott. If the jody metabolize the kingsly then the kingsly is uterine. If someone mill the jody and they are uterine then they visit the benedicta. The benedicta fluoresce the emmott.", "logic": "\nEellike(kingsly)\nMetabolize(emmott, kingsly)\nFluoresce(benedicta, jody)\nInsolent(jody)\nforall x (Mill(x, benedicta) and Casteless(x) -> Metabolize(benedicta, kingsly))\nforall x (Eellike(x) -> Fluoresce(x, kingsly))\nforall x (Eellike(x) -> Fluoresce(x, emmott))\nforall x (Fluoresce(x, kingsly) -> Metabolize(kingsly, emmott))\nMetabolize(jody, kingsly) -> Uterine(kingsly)\nforall x (Mill(x, jody) and Uterine(x) -> Metabolize(x, benedicta))\n\nFluoresce(benedicta, emmott)\n\nforall x (Eellike(x) -> Fluoresce(x, emmott)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The sayers is goofy. The stanfield jell the sayers. The toby decree the chelton. The chelton is phonetic. If someone excise the toby and they are pinnate then the toby jell the sayers. If someone is goofy then they like the sayers. If someone is goofy then they like the stanfield. If someone decree the sayers then the sayers jell the stanfield. If the chelton jell the sayers then the sayers is affinal. If someone excise the chelton and they are affinal then they visit the toby. The stanfield does not visit the toby.", "logic": "\nGoofy(sayers)\nJell(stanfield, sayers)\nDecree(toby, chelton)\nPhonetic(chelton)\nforall x (Excise(x, toby) and Pinnate(x) -> Jell(toby, sayers))\nforall x (Goofy(x) -> Decree(x, sayers))\nforall x (Goofy(x) -> Decree(x, stanfield))\nforall x (Decree(x, sayers) -> Jell(sayers, stanfield))\nJell(chelton, sayers) -> Affinal(sayers)\nforall x (Excise(x, chelton) and Affinal(x) -> Jell(x, toby))\n\nnot Jell(stanfield, toby)\n\nforall x (Excise(x, chelton) and Affinal(x) -> Jell(x, toby)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The cindee is denotive. The clark labour the cindee. The ozzie shroud the julius. The julius is bimotored. If someone constrain the ozzie and they are cognizant then the ozzie labour the cindee. If someone is denotive then they like the cindee. If someone is denotive then they like the clark. If someone shroud the cindee then the cindee labour the clark. If the julius labour the cindee then the cindee is spinnbar. If someone constrain the julius and they are spinnbar then they visit the ozzie. The ozzie constrain the cindee.", "logic": "\nDenotive(cindee)\nLabour(clark, cindee)\nShroud(ozzie, julius)\nBimotored(julius)\nforall x (Constrain(x, ozzie) and Cognizant(x) -> Labour(ozzie, cindee))\nforall x (Denotive(x) -> Shroud(x, cindee))\nforall x (Denotive(x) -> Shroud(x, clark))\nforall x (Shroud(x, cindee) -> Labour(cindee, clark))\nLabour(julius, cindee) -> Spinnbar(cindee)\nforall x (Constrain(x, julius) and Spinnbar(x) -> Labour(x, ozzie))\n\nConstrain(ozzie, cindee)\n\nConstrain(ozzie, cindee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The ethelbert is rifled. The dasie uncross the ethelbert. The matelda recall the lonni. The lonni is retrorse. If someone discompose the matelda and they are herbal then the matelda uncross the ethelbert. If someone is rifled then they like the ethelbert. If someone is rifled then they like the dasie. If someone recall the ethelbert then the ethelbert uncross the dasie. If the lonni uncross the ethelbert then the ethelbert is echoless. If someone discompose the lonni and they are echoless then they visit the matelda. The ethelbert does not eat the lonni.", "logic": "\nRifled(ethelbert)\nUncross(dasie, ethelbert)\nRecall(matelda, lonni)\nRetrorse(lonni)\nforall x (Discompose(x, matelda) and Herbal(x) -> Uncross(matelda, ethelbert))\nforall x (Rifled(x) -> Recall(x, ethelbert))\nforall x (Rifled(x) -> Recall(x, dasie))\nforall x (Recall(x, ethelbert) -> Uncross(ethelbert, dasie))\nUncross(lonni, ethelbert) -> Echoless(ethelbert)\nforall x (Discompose(x, lonni) and Echoless(x) -> Uncross(x, matelda))\n\nnot Discompose(ethelbert, lonni)\n\nnot Discompose(ethelbert, lonni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The paolina is dreadful. The leslie amerce the paolina. The rachel backspace the charlott. The charlott is beaten. If someone denounce the rachel and they are paniculate then the rachel amerce the paolina. If someone is dreadful then they like the paolina. If someone is dreadful then they like the leslie. If someone backspace the paolina then the paolina amerce the leslie. If the charlott amerce the paolina then the paolina is foamy. If someone denounce the charlott and they are foamy then they visit the rachel. The rachel amerce the leslie.", "logic": "\nDreadful(paolina)\nAmerce(leslie, paolina)\nBackspace(rachel, charlott)\nBeaten(charlott)\nforall x (Denounce(x, rachel) and Paniculate(x) -> Amerce(rachel, paolina))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> Backspace(x, paolina))\nforall x (Dreadful(x) -> Backspace(x, leslie))\nforall x (Backspace(x, paolina) -> Amerce(paolina, leslie))\nAmerce(charlott, paolina) -> Foamy(paolina)\nforall x (Denounce(x, charlott) and Foamy(x) -> Amerce(x, rachel))\n\nAmerce(rachel, leslie)\n\nAmerce(rachel, leslie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1745"} {"premises": "The marrilee fraction the herculie. The herculie fraction the marrilee. If the herculie fraction the marrilee and the herculie is swayback then the marrilee authorise the herculie. If someone authorise the herculie then the herculie is appressed. If someone fraction the marrilee and the marrilee fraction the herculie then the herculie is swayback. The marrilee fraction the herculie.", "logic": "\nFraction(marrilee, herculie)\nFraction(herculie, marrilee)\nFraction(herculie, marrilee) and Swayback(herculie) -> Authorise(marrilee, herculie)\nforall x (Authorise(x, herculie) -> Appressed(herculie))\nforall x (Fraction(x, marrilee) and Fraction(marrilee, herculie) -> Swayback(herculie))\n\nFraction(marrilee, herculie)\n\ntherefore Fraction(marrilee, herculie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The emerson depart the haywood. The haywood depart the emerson. If the haywood depart the emerson and the haywood is confused then the emerson drub the haywood. If someone drub the haywood then the haywood is balconied. If someone depart the emerson and the emerson depart the haywood then the haywood is confused. The emerson does not visit the haywood.", "logic": "\nDepart(emerson, haywood)\nDepart(haywood, emerson)\nDepart(haywood, emerson) and Confused(haywood) -> Drub(emerson, haywood)\nforall x (Drub(x, haywood) -> Balconied(haywood))\nforall x (Depart(x, emerson) and Depart(emerson, haywood) -> Confused(haywood))\n\nnot Depart(emerson, haywood)\n\ntherefore Depart(emerson, haywood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The carolynn extinguish the dwaine. The dwaine extinguish the carolynn. If the dwaine extinguish the carolynn and the dwaine is thrilling then the carolynn summerise the dwaine. If someone summerise the dwaine then the dwaine is curvey. If someone extinguish the carolynn and the carolynn extinguish the dwaine then the dwaine is thrilling. The dwaine is thrilling.", "logic": "\nExtinguish(carolynn, dwaine)\nExtinguish(dwaine, carolynn)\nExtinguish(dwaine, carolynn) and Thrilling(dwaine) -> Summerise(carolynn, dwaine)\nforall x (Summerise(x, dwaine) -> Curvey(dwaine))\nforall x (Extinguish(x, carolynn) and Extinguish(carolynn, dwaine) -> Thrilling(dwaine))\n\nThrilling(dwaine)\n\nExtinguish(dwaine, carolynn) and Extinguish(carolynn, dwaine) and forall x (Extinguish(x, carolynn) and Extinguish(carolynn, dwaine) -> Thrilling(dwaine)) -> therefore Thrilling(dwaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The tine railroad the trever. The trever railroad the tine. If the trever railroad the tine and the trever is steamed then the tine backdate the trever. If someone backdate the trever then the trever is curving. If someone railroad the tine and the tine railroad the trever then the trever is steamed. The trever is not steamed.", "logic": "\nRailroad(tine, trever)\nRailroad(trever, tine)\nRailroad(trever, tine) and Steamed(trever) -> Backdate(tine, trever)\nforall x (Backdate(x, trever) -> Curving(trever))\nforall x (Railroad(x, tine) and Railroad(tine, trever) -> Steamed(trever))\n\nnot Steamed(trever)\n\nRailroad(trever, tine) and Railroad(tine, trever) and forall x (Railroad(x, tine) and Railroad(tine, trever) -> Steamed(trever)) -> therefore Steamed(trever)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The kassandra diss the giuseppe. The giuseppe diss the kassandra. If the giuseppe diss the kassandra and the giuseppe is petaloid then the kassandra revere the giuseppe. If someone revere the giuseppe then the giuseppe is behavioral. If someone diss the kassandra and the kassandra diss the giuseppe then the giuseppe is petaloid. The kassandra revere the giuseppe.", "logic": "\nDiss(kassandra, giuseppe)\nDiss(giuseppe, kassandra)\nDiss(giuseppe, kassandra) and Petaloid(giuseppe) -> Revere(kassandra, giuseppe)\nforall x (Revere(x, giuseppe) -> Behavioral(giuseppe))\nforall x (Diss(x, kassandra) and Diss(kassandra, giuseppe) -> Petaloid(giuseppe))\n\nRevere(kassandra, giuseppe)\n\nDiss(giuseppe, kassandra) and Diss(kassandra, giuseppe) and forall x (Diss(x, kassandra) and Diss(kassandra, giuseppe) -> Petaloid(giuseppe)) -> therefore Petaloid(giuseppe) Diss(giuseppe, kassandra) and Petaloid(giuseppe) and Diss(giuseppe, kassandra) and Petaloid(giuseppe) -> Revere(kassandra, giuseppe) -> therefore Revere(kassandra, giuseppe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The karylin forage the raymundo. The raymundo forage the karylin. If the raymundo forage the karylin and the raymundo is protanopic then the karylin lodge the raymundo. If someone lodge the raymundo then the raymundo is detachable. If someone forage the karylin and the karylin forage the raymundo then the raymundo is protanopic. The karylin does not chase the raymundo.", "logic": "\nForage(karylin, raymundo)\nForage(raymundo, karylin)\nForage(raymundo, karylin) and Protanopic(raymundo) -> Lodge(karylin, raymundo)\nforall x (Lodge(x, raymundo) -> Detachable(raymundo))\nforall x (Forage(x, karylin) and Forage(karylin, raymundo) -> Protanopic(raymundo))\n\nnot Lodge(karylin, raymundo)\n\nForage(raymundo, karylin) and Forage(karylin, raymundo) and forall x (Forage(x, karylin) and Forage(karylin, raymundo) -> Protanopic(raymundo)) -> therefore Protanopic(raymundo) Forage(raymundo, karylin) and Protanopic(raymundo) and Forage(raymundo, karylin) and Protanopic(raymundo) -> Lodge(karylin, raymundo) -> therefore Lodge(karylin, raymundo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The munroe unitise the gaylene. The gaylene unitise the munroe. If the gaylene unitise the munroe and the gaylene is envisioned then the munroe unbridle the gaylene. If someone unbridle the gaylene then the gaylene is nodular. If someone unitise the munroe and the munroe unitise the gaylene then the gaylene is envisioned. The gaylene is nodular.", "logic": "\nUnitise(munroe, gaylene)\nUnitise(gaylene, munroe)\nUnitise(gaylene, munroe) and Envisioned(gaylene) -> Unbridle(munroe, gaylene)\nforall x (Unbridle(x, gaylene) -> Nodular(gaylene))\nforall x (Unitise(x, munroe) and Unitise(munroe, gaylene) -> Envisioned(gaylene))\n\nNodular(gaylene)\n\nUnitise(gaylene, munroe) and Unitise(munroe, gaylene) and forall x (Unitise(x, munroe) and Unitise(munroe, gaylene) -> Envisioned(gaylene)) -> therefore Envisioned(gaylene) Unitise(gaylene, munroe) and Envisioned(gaylene) and Unitise(gaylene, munroe) and Envisioned(gaylene) -> Unbridle(munroe, gaylene) -> therefore Unbridle(munroe, gaylene) Unbridle(munroe, gaylene) and forall x (Unbridle(x, gaylene) -> Nodular(gaylene)) -> therefore Nodular(gaylene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The agretha remodel the corwin. The corwin remodel the agretha. If the corwin remodel the agretha and the corwin is unrewarded then the agretha fund the corwin. If someone fund the corwin then the corwin is chance. If someone remodel the agretha and the agretha remodel the corwin then the corwin is unrewarded. The corwin is not chance.", "logic": "\nRemodel(agretha, corwin)\nRemodel(corwin, agretha)\nRemodel(corwin, agretha) and Unrewarded(corwin) -> Fund(agretha, corwin)\nforall x (Fund(x, corwin) -> Chance(corwin))\nforall x (Remodel(x, agretha) and Remodel(agretha, corwin) -> Unrewarded(corwin))\n\nnot Chance(corwin)\n\nRemodel(corwin, agretha) and Remodel(agretha, corwin) and forall x (Remodel(x, agretha) and Remodel(agretha, corwin) -> Unrewarded(corwin)) -> therefore Unrewarded(corwin) Remodel(corwin, agretha) and Unrewarded(corwin) and Remodel(corwin, agretha) and Unrewarded(corwin) -> Fund(agretha, corwin) -> therefore Fund(agretha, corwin) Fund(agretha, corwin) and forall x (Fund(x, corwin) -> Chance(corwin)) -> therefore Chance(corwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The vittoria brutalize the tamara. The tamara brutalize the vittoria. If the tamara brutalize the vittoria and the tamara is deviate then the vittoria animadvert the tamara. If someone animadvert the tamara then the tamara is ignorant. If someone brutalize the vittoria and the vittoria brutalize the tamara then the tamara is deviate. The vittoria is not nice.", "logic": "\nBrutalize(vittoria, tamara)\nBrutalize(tamara, vittoria)\nBrutalize(tamara, vittoria) and Deviate(tamara) -> Animadvert(vittoria, tamara)\nforall x (Animadvert(x, tamara) -> Ignorant(tamara))\nforall x (Brutalize(x, vittoria) and Brutalize(vittoria, tamara) -> Deviate(tamara))\n\nnot Nice(vittoria)\n\nnot Nice(vittoria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The martie develop the higgins. The higgins develop the martie. If the higgins develop the martie and the higgins is iranian then the martie stun the higgins. If someone stun the higgins then the higgins is splenetic. If someone develop the martie and the martie develop the higgins then the higgins is iranian. The martie stun the martie.", "logic": "\nDevelop(martie, higgins)\nDevelop(higgins, martie)\nDevelop(higgins, martie) and Iranian(higgins) -> Stun(martie, higgins)\nforall x (Stun(x, higgins) -> Splenetic(higgins))\nforall x (Develop(x, martie) and Develop(martie, higgins) -> Iranian(higgins))\n\nStun(martie, martie)\n\nStun(martie, martie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The sapphire guffaw the gabrielle. The gabrielle guffaw the sapphire. If the gabrielle guffaw the sapphire and the gabrielle is featured then the sapphire splint the gabrielle. If someone splint the gabrielle then the gabrielle is urbane. If someone guffaw the sapphire and the sapphire guffaw the gabrielle then the gabrielle is featured. The sapphire is not cold.", "logic": "\nGuffaw(sapphire, gabrielle)\nGuffaw(gabrielle, sapphire)\nGuffaw(gabrielle, sapphire) and Featured(gabrielle) -> Splint(sapphire, gabrielle)\nforall x (Splint(x, gabrielle) -> Urbane(gabrielle))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, sapphire) and Guffaw(sapphire, gabrielle) -> Featured(gabrielle))\n\nnot Cold(sapphire)\n\nnot Cold(sapphire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The clayborne inveigle the betsey. The betsey inveigle the clayborne. If the betsey inveigle the clayborne and the betsey is vanilla then the clayborne rust the betsey. If someone rust the betsey then the betsey is faraway. If someone inveigle the clayborne and the clayborne inveigle the betsey then the betsey is vanilla. The betsey sees the betsey.", "logic": "\nInveigle(clayborne, betsey)\nInveigle(betsey, clayborne)\nInveigle(betsey, clayborne) and Vanilla(betsey) -> Rust(clayborne, betsey)\nforall x (Rust(x, betsey) -> Faraway(betsey))\nforall x (Inveigle(x, clayborne) and Inveigle(clayborne, betsey) -> Vanilla(betsey))\n\nSees(betsey, betsey)\n\nSees(betsey, betsey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The klee happen the jemmy. The jemmy happen the klee. If the jemmy happen the klee and the jemmy is largish then the klee hydroplane the jemmy. If someone hydroplane the jemmy then the jemmy is alluring. If someone happen the klee and the klee happen the jemmy then the jemmy is largish. The klee does not see the jemmy.", "logic": "\nHappen(klee, jemmy)\nHappen(jemmy, klee)\nHappen(jemmy, klee) and Largish(jemmy) -> Hydroplane(klee, jemmy)\nforall x (Hydroplane(x, jemmy) -> Alluring(jemmy))\nforall x (Happen(x, klee) and Happen(klee, jemmy) -> Largish(jemmy))\n\nnot Sees(klee, jemmy)\n\nnot Sees(klee, jemmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The rozelle wedel the bari. The bari wedel the rozelle. If the bari wedel the rozelle and the bari is artful then the rozelle enkindle the bari. If someone enkindle the bari then the bari is devoted. If someone wedel the rozelle and the rozelle wedel the bari then the bari is artful. The bari enkindle the bari.", "logic": "\nWedel(rozelle, bari)\nWedel(bari, rozelle)\nWedel(bari, rozelle) and Artful(bari) -> Enkindle(rozelle, bari)\nforall x (Enkindle(x, bari) -> Devoted(bari))\nforall x (Wedel(x, rozelle) and Wedel(rozelle, bari) -> Artful(bari))\n\nEnkindle(bari, bari)\n\nEnkindle(bari, bari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The marquita jettison the shir. The shir jettison the marquita. If the shir jettison the marquita and the shir is worst then the marquita rumpus the shir. If someone rumpus the shir then the shir is evidential. If someone jettison the marquita and the marquita jettison the shir then the shir is worst. The shir does not see the marquita.", "logic": "\nJettison(marquita, shir)\nJettison(shir, marquita)\nJettison(shir, marquita) and Worst(shir) -> Rumpus(marquita, shir)\nforall x (Rumpus(x, shir) -> Evidential(shir))\nforall x (Jettison(x, marquita) and Jettison(marquita, shir) -> Worst(shir))\n\nnot Sees(shir, marquita)\n\nnot Sees(shir, marquita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The harmon entreat the hakim. The hakim entreat the harmon. If the hakim entreat the harmon and the hakim is disgustful then the harmon shine the hakim. If someone shine the hakim then the hakim is millionth. If someone entreat the harmon and the harmon entreat the hakim then the hakim is disgustful. The hakim entreat the hakim.", "logic": "\nEntreat(harmon, hakim)\nEntreat(hakim, harmon)\nEntreat(hakim, harmon) and Disgustful(hakim) -> Shine(harmon, hakim)\nforall x (Shine(x, hakim) -> Millionth(hakim))\nforall x (Entreat(x, harmon) and Entreat(harmon, hakim) -> Disgustful(hakim))\n\nEntreat(hakim, hakim)\n\nEntreat(hakim, hakim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-5"} {"premises": "The serene shed the georgine. The serene misdo the desiree. The serene is eastmost. The desiree shed the serene. The desiree is eastmost. The desiree is not noteworthy. The desiree coapt the serene. The georgine shed the desiree. The georgine misdo the serene. The georgine is not noteworthy. If someone coapt the serene then the serene shed the desiree. If someone shed the serene and the serene shed the desiree then the desiree shed the georgine. If someone shed the serene then they like the serene. The serene misdo the desiree.", "logic": "\nShed(serene, georgine)\nMisdo(serene, desiree)\nEastmost(serene)\nShed(desiree, serene)\nEastmost(desiree)\nnot Noteworthy(desiree)\nCoapt(desiree, serene)\nShed(georgine, desiree)\nMisdo(georgine, serene)\nnot Noteworthy(georgine)\nforall x (Coapt(x, serene) -> Shed(serene, desiree))\nforall x (Shed(x, serene) and Shed(serene, desiree) -> Shed(desiree, georgine))\nforall x (Shed(x, serene) -> Coapt(x, serene))\n\nMisdo(serene, desiree)\n\ntherefore Misdo(serene, desiree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The salomone serve the graig. The salomone burglarize the eleonore. The salomone is hysterical. The eleonore serve the salomone. The eleonore is hysterical. The eleonore is not lobular. The eleonore buckram the salomone. The graig serve the eleonore. The graig burglarize the salomone. The graig is not lobular. If someone buckram the salomone then the salomone serve the eleonore. If someone serve the salomone and the salomone serve the eleonore then the eleonore serve the graig. If someone serve the salomone then they like the salomone. The graig does not chase the eleonore.", "logic": "\nServe(salomone, graig)\nBurglarize(salomone, eleonore)\nHysterical(salomone)\nServe(eleonore, salomone)\nHysterical(eleonore)\nnot Lobular(eleonore)\nBuckram(eleonore, salomone)\nServe(graig, eleonore)\nBurglarize(graig, salomone)\nnot Lobular(graig)\nforall x (Buckram(x, salomone) -> Serve(salomone, eleonore))\nforall x (Serve(x, salomone) and Serve(salomone, eleonore) -> Serve(eleonore, graig))\nforall x (Serve(x, salomone) -> Buckram(x, salomone))\n\nnot Serve(graig, eleonore)\n\ntherefore Serve(graig, eleonore)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The clary blame the zeke. The clary snicker the lina. The clary is captive. The lina blame the clary. The lina is captive. The lina is not honourable. The lina snarf the clary. The zeke blame the lina. The zeke snicker the clary. The zeke is not honourable. If someone snarf the clary then the clary blame the lina. If someone blame the clary and the clary blame the lina then the lina blame the zeke. If someone blame the clary then they like the clary. The clary blame the lina.", "logic": "\nBlame(clary, zeke)\nSnicker(clary, lina)\nCaptive(clary)\nBlame(lina, clary)\nCaptive(lina)\nnot Honourable(lina)\nSnarf(lina, clary)\nBlame(zeke, lina)\nSnicker(zeke, clary)\nnot Honourable(zeke)\nforall x (Snarf(x, clary) -> Blame(clary, lina))\nforall x (Blame(x, clary) and Blame(clary, lina) -> Blame(lina, zeke))\nforall x (Blame(x, clary) -> Snarf(x, clary))\n\nBlame(clary, lina)\n\nSnarf(lina, clary) and forall x (Snarf(x, clary) -> Blame(clary, lina)) -> therefore Blame(clary, lina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The scottie regret the cindy. The scottie station the craig. The scottie is scrappy. The craig regret the scottie. The craig is scrappy. The craig is not xeric. The craig quip the scottie. The cindy regret the craig. The cindy station the scottie. The cindy is not xeric. If someone quip the scottie then the scottie regret the craig. If someone regret the scottie and the scottie regret the craig then the craig regret the cindy. If someone regret the scottie then they like the scottie. The scottie does not chase the craig.", "logic": "\nRegret(scottie, cindy)\nStation(scottie, craig)\nScrappy(scottie)\nRegret(craig, scottie)\nScrappy(craig)\nnot Xeric(craig)\nQuip(craig, scottie)\nRegret(cindy, craig)\nStation(cindy, scottie)\nnot Xeric(cindy)\nforall x (Quip(x, scottie) -> Regret(scottie, craig))\nforall x (Regret(x, scottie) and Regret(scottie, craig) -> Regret(craig, cindy))\nforall x (Regret(x, scottie) -> Quip(x, scottie))\n\nnot Regret(scottie, craig)\n\nQuip(craig, scottie) and forall x (Quip(x, scottie) -> Regret(scottie, craig)) -> therefore Regret(scottie, craig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The wilfred retard the erasmus. The wilfred introduce the harley. The wilfred is braised. The harley retard the wilfred. The harley is braised. The harley is not queasy. The harley stockpile the wilfred. The erasmus retard the harley. The erasmus introduce the wilfred. The erasmus is not queasy. If someone stockpile the wilfred then the wilfred retard the harley. If someone retard the wilfred and the wilfred retard the harley then the harley retard the erasmus. If someone retard the wilfred then they like the wilfred. The harley retard the erasmus.", "logic": "\nRetard(wilfred, erasmus)\nIntroduce(wilfred, harley)\nBraised(wilfred)\nRetard(harley, wilfred)\nBraised(harley)\nnot Queasy(harley)\nStockpile(harley, wilfred)\nRetard(erasmus, harley)\nIntroduce(erasmus, wilfred)\nnot Queasy(erasmus)\nforall x (Stockpile(x, wilfred) -> Retard(wilfred, harley))\nforall x (Retard(x, wilfred) and Retard(wilfred, harley) -> Retard(harley, erasmus))\nforall x (Retard(x, wilfred) -> Stockpile(x, wilfred))\n\nRetard(harley, erasmus)\n\nStockpile(harley, wilfred) and forall x (Stockpile(x, wilfred) -> Retard(wilfred, harley)) -> therefore Retard(wilfred, harley) Retard(harley, wilfred) and Retard(wilfred, harley) and forall x (Retard(x, wilfred) and Retard(wilfred, harley) -> Retard(harley, erasmus)) -> therefore Retard(harley, erasmus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The virgilio tool the pierce. The virgilio shade the janeen. The virgilio is acoustic. The janeen tool the virgilio. The janeen is acoustic. The janeen is not improper. The janeen foster the virgilio. The pierce tool the janeen. The pierce shade the virgilio. The pierce is not improper. If someone foster the virgilio then the virgilio tool the janeen. If someone tool the virgilio and the virgilio tool the janeen then the janeen tool the pierce. If someone tool the virgilio then they like the virgilio. The janeen does not chase the pierce.", "logic": "\nTool(virgilio, pierce)\nShade(virgilio, janeen)\nAcoustic(virgilio)\nTool(janeen, virgilio)\nAcoustic(janeen)\nnot Improper(janeen)\nFoster(janeen, virgilio)\nTool(pierce, janeen)\nShade(pierce, virgilio)\nnot Improper(pierce)\nforall x (Foster(x, virgilio) -> Tool(virgilio, janeen))\nforall x (Tool(x, virgilio) and Tool(virgilio, janeen) -> Tool(janeen, pierce))\nforall x (Tool(x, virgilio) -> Foster(x, virgilio))\n\nnot Tool(janeen, pierce)\n\nFoster(janeen, virgilio) and forall x (Foster(x, virgilio) -> Tool(virgilio, janeen)) -> therefore Tool(virgilio, janeen) Tool(janeen, virgilio) and Tool(virgilio, janeen) and forall x (Tool(x, virgilio) and Tool(virgilio, janeen) -> Tool(janeen, pierce)) -> therefore Tool(janeen, pierce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The randi start the kathi. The randi besiege the edmond. The randi is nuclear. The edmond start the randi. The edmond is nuclear. The edmond is not novel. The edmond dado the randi. The kathi start the edmond. The kathi besiege the randi. The kathi is not novel. If someone dado the randi then the randi start the edmond. If someone start the randi and the randi start the edmond then the edmond start the kathi. If someone start the randi then they like the randi. The kathi does not like the randi.", "logic": "\nStart(randi, kathi)\nBesiege(randi, edmond)\nNuclear(randi)\nStart(edmond, randi)\nNuclear(edmond)\nnot Novel(edmond)\nDado(edmond, randi)\nStart(kathi, edmond)\nBesiege(kathi, randi)\nnot Novel(kathi)\nforall x (Dado(x, randi) -> Start(randi, edmond))\nforall x (Start(x, randi) and Start(randi, edmond) -> Start(edmond, kathi))\nforall x (Start(x, randi) -> Dado(x, randi))\n\nnot Dado(kathi, randi)\n\nforall x (Start(x, randi) -> Dado(x, randi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The stefano dismiss the vikky. The stefano step the mateo. The stefano is baffled. The mateo dismiss the stefano. The mateo is baffled. The mateo is not unclaimed. The mateo plastinate the stefano. The vikky dismiss the mateo. The vikky step the stefano. The vikky is not unclaimed. If someone plastinate the stefano then the stefano dismiss the mateo. If someone dismiss the stefano and the stefano dismiss the mateo then the mateo dismiss the vikky. If someone dismiss the stefano then they like the stefano. The stefano plastinate the stefano.", "logic": "\nDismiss(stefano, vikky)\nStep(stefano, mateo)\nBaffled(stefano)\nDismiss(mateo, stefano)\nBaffled(mateo)\nnot Unclaimed(mateo)\nPlastinate(mateo, stefano)\nDismiss(vikky, mateo)\nStep(vikky, stefano)\nnot Unclaimed(vikky)\nforall x (Plastinate(x, stefano) -> Dismiss(stefano, mateo))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, stefano) and Dismiss(stefano, mateo) -> Dismiss(mateo, vikky))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, stefano) -> Plastinate(x, stefano))\n\nPlastinate(stefano, stefano)\n\nforall x (Dismiss(x, stefano) -> Plastinate(x, stefano)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The giraldo collar the othilie. The giraldo resume the carolin. The giraldo is finical. The carolin collar the giraldo. The carolin is finical. The carolin is not unheaded. The carolin cockle the giraldo. The othilie collar the carolin. The othilie resume the giraldo. The othilie is not unheaded. If someone cockle the giraldo then the giraldo collar the carolin. If someone collar the giraldo and the giraldo collar the carolin then the carolin collar the othilie. If someone collar the giraldo then they like the giraldo. The giraldo does not eat the giraldo.", "logic": "\nCollar(giraldo, othilie)\nResume(giraldo, carolin)\nFinical(giraldo)\nCollar(carolin, giraldo)\nFinical(carolin)\nnot Unheaded(carolin)\nCockle(carolin, giraldo)\nCollar(othilie, carolin)\nResume(othilie, giraldo)\nnot Unheaded(othilie)\nforall x (Cockle(x, giraldo) -> Collar(giraldo, carolin))\nforall x (Collar(x, giraldo) and Collar(giraldo, carolin) -> Collar(carolin, othilie))\nforall x (Collar(x, giraldo) -> Cockle(x, giraldo))\n\nnot Resume(giraldo, giraldo)\n\nnot Resume(giraldo, giraldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The lonny grumble the clayborn. The lonny boom the evita. The lonny is excellent. The evita grumble the lonny. The evita is excellent. The evita is not tenfold. The evita pulverise the lonny. The clayborn grumble the evita. The clayborn boom the lonny. The clayborn is not tenfold. If someone pulverise the lonny then the lonny grumble the evita. If someone grumble the lonny and the lonny grumble the evita then the evita grumble the clayborn. If someone grumble the lonny then they like the lonny. The lonny is young.", "logic": "\nGrumble(lonny, clayborn)\nBoom(lonny, evita)\nExcellent(lonny)\nGrumble(evita, lonny)\nExcellent(evita)\nnot Tenfold(evita)\nPulverise(evita, lonny)\nGrumble(clayborn, evita)\nBoom(clayborn, lonny)\nnot Tenfold(clayborn)\nforall x (Pulverise(x, lonny) -> Grumble(lonny, evita))\nforall x (Grumble(x, lonny) and Grumble(lonny, evita) -> Grumble(evita, clayborn))\nforall x (Grumble(x, lonny) -> Pulverise(x, lonny))\n\nYoung(lonny)\n\nYoung(lonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The daisie hazard the celisse. The daisie sheet the winford. The daisie is dendroidal. The winford hazard the daisie. The winford is dendroidal. The winford is not unstable. The winford name the daisie. The celisse hazard the winford. The celisse sheet the daisie. The celisse is not unstable. If someone name the daisie then the daisie hazard the winford. If someone hazard the daisie and the daisie hazard the winford then the winford hazard the celisse. If someone hazard the daisie then they like the daisie. The daisie does not chase the daisie.", "logic": "\nHazard(daisie, celisse)\nSheet(daisie, winford)\nDendroidal(daisie)\nHazard(winford, daisie)\nDendroidal(winford)\nnot Unstable(winford)\nName(winford, daisie)\nHazard(celisse, winford)\nSheet(celisse, daisie)\nnot Unstable(celisse)\nforall x (Name(x, daisie) -> Hazard(daisie, winford))\nforall x (Hazard(x, daisie) and Hazard(daisie, winford) -> Hazard(winford, celisse))\nforall x (Hazard(x, daisie) -> Name(x, daisie))\n\nnot Hazard(daisie, daisie)\n\nnot Hazard(daisie, daisie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "The tiffy choose the ariadne. The tiffy disqualify the mirabelle. The tiffy is jungian. The mirabelle choose the tiffy. The mirabelle is jungian. The mirabelle is not muddled. The mirabelle substitute the tiffy. The ariadne choose the mirabelle. The ariadne disqualify the tiffy. The ariadne is not muddled. If someone substitute the tiffy then the tiffy choose the mirabelle. If someone choose the tiffy and the tiffy choose the mirabelle then the mirabelle choose the ariadne. If someone choose the tiffy then they like the tiffy. The tiffy substitute the ariadne.", "logic": "\nChoose(tiffy, ariadne)\nDisqualify(tiffy, mirabelle)\nJungian(tiffy)\nChoose(mirabelle, tiffy)\nJungian(mirabelle)\nnot Muddled(mirabelle)\nSubstitute(mirabelle, tiffy)\nChoose(ariadne, mirabelle)\nDisqualify(ariadne, tiffy)\nnot Muddled(ariadne)\nforall x (Substitute(x, tiffy) -> Choose(tiffy, mirabelle))\nforall x (Choose(x, tiffy) and Choose(tiffy, mirabelle) -> Choose(mirabelle, ariadne))\nforall x (Choose(x, tiffy) -> Substitute(x, tiffy))\n\nSubstitute(tiffy, ariadne)\n\nSubstitute(tiffy, ariadne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-703"} {"premises": "Mathilda is jeweled. Mathilda is antiviral. Mathilda is boggy. Mathilda is unerect. Revkah is antiviral. Revkah is boggy. Revkah is accidental. Revkah is nutty. Ora is accidental. Ora is nutty. Ora is unerect. Ora is directing. All unerect, antiviral things are boggy. If something is directing then it is antiviral. Nice, unerect things are accidental. If Mathilda is accidental then Mathilda is unerect. If something is antiviral and boggy then it is jeweled. All boggy, unerect things are directing. If something is jeweled and unerect then it is boggy. If Mathilda is nutty and Mathilda is directing then Mathilda is unerect. Ora is unerect.", "logic": "\nJeweled(mathilda)\nAntiviral(mathilda)\nBoggy(mathilda)\nUnerect(mathilda)\nAntiviral(revkah)\nBoggy(revkah)\nAccidental(revkah)\nNutty(revkah)\nAccidental(ora)\nNutty(ora)\nUnerect(ora)\nDirecting(ora)\nforall x (Unerect(x) and Antiviral(x) -> Boggy(x))\nforall x (Directing(x) -> Antiviral(x))\nforall x (Boggy(x) and Unerect(x) -> Accidental(x))\nAccidental(mathilda) -> Unerect(mathilda)\nforall x (Antiviral(x) and Boggy(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Boggy(x) and Unerect(x) -> Directing(x))\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and Unerect(x) -> Boggy(x))\nNutty(mathilda) and Directing(mathilda) -> Unerect(mathilda)\n\nUnerect(ora)\n\ntherefore Unerect(ora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Nissie is pessimum. Nissie is forehand. Nissie is aftermost. Nissie is draining. Otha is forehand. Otha is aftermost. Otha is baffled. Otha is homing. Patrica is baffled. Patrica is homing. Patrica is draining. Patrica is edifying. All draining, forehand things are aftermost. If something is edifying then it is forehand. Nice, draining things are baffled. If Nissie is baffled then Nissie is draining. If something is forehand and aftermost then it is pessimum. All aftermost, draining things are edifying. If something is pessimum and draining then it is aftermost. If Nissie is homing and Nissie is edifying then Nissie is draining. Patrica is not draining.", "logic": "\nPessimum(nissie)\nForehand(nissie)\nAftermost(nissie)\nDraining(nissie)\nForehand(otha)\nAftermost(otha)\nBaffled(otha)\nHoming(otha)\nBaffled(patrica)\nHoming(patrica)\nDraining(patrica)\nEdifying(patrica)\nforall x (Draining(x) and Forehand(x) -> Aftermost(x))\nforall x (Edifying(x) -> Forehand(x))\nforall x (Aftermost(x) and Draining(x) -> Baffled(x))\nBaffled(nissie) -> Draining(nissie)\nforall x (Forehand(x) and Aftermost(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Aftermost(x) and Draining(x) -> Edifying(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) and Draining(x) -> Aftermost(x))\nHoming(nissie) and Edifying(nissie) -> Draining(nissie)\n\nnot Draining(patrica)\n\ntherefore Draining(patrica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Regen is matt. Regen is express. Regen is contested. Regen is damp. Dody is express. Dody is contested. Dody is anile. Dody is unheard. Parker is anile. Parker is unheard. Parker is damp. Parker is papist. All damp, express things are contested. If something is papist then it is express. Nice, damp things are anile. If Regen is anile then Regen is damp. If something is express and contested then it is matt. All contested, damp things are papist. If something is matt and damp then it is contested. If Regen is unheard and Regen is papist then Regen is damp. Dody is matt.", "logic": "\nMatt(regen)\nExpress(regen)\nContested(regen)\nDamp(regen)\nExpress(dody)\nContested(dody)\nAnile(dody)\nUnheard(dody)\nAnile(parker)\nUnheard(parker)\nDamp(parker)\nPapist(parker)\nforall x (Damp(x) and Express(x) -> Contested(x))\nforall x (Papist(x) -> Express(x))\nforall x (Contested(x) and Damp(x) -> Anile(x))\nAnile(regen) -> Damp(regen)\nforall x (Express(x) and Contested(x) -> Matt(x))\nforall x (Contested(x) and Damp(x) -> Papist(x))\nforall x (Matt(x) and Damp(x) -> Contested(x))\nUnheard(regen) and Papist(regen) -> Damp(regen)\n\nMatt(dody)\n\nExpress(dody) and Contested(dody) and forall x (Express(x) and Contested(x) -> Matt(x)) -> therefore Matt(dody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Deb is nicene. Deb is liver. Deb is breathed. Deb is disabled. Elizabeth is liver. Elizabeth is breathed. Elizabeth is evaporated. Elizabeth is covalent. Judye is evaporated. Judye is covalent. Judye is disabled. Judye is aired. All disabled, liver things are breathed. If something is aired then it is liver. Nice, disabled things are evaporated. If Deb is evaporated then Deb is disabled. If something is liver and breathed then it is nicene. All breathed, disabled things are aired. If something is nicene and disabled then it is breathed. If Deb is covalent and Deb is aired then Deb is disabled. Elizabeth is not nicene.", "logic": "\nNicene(deb)\nLiver(deb)\nBreathed(deb)\nDisabled(deb)\nLiver(elizabeth)\nBreathed(elizabeth)\nEvaporated(elizabeth)\nCovalent(elizabeth)\nEvaporated(judye)\nCovalent(judye)\nDisabled(judye)\nAired(judye)\nforall x (Disabled(x) and Liver(x) -> Breathed(x))\nforall x (Aired(x) -> Liver(x))\nforall x (Breathed(x) and Disabled(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nEvaporated(deb) -> Disabled(deb)\nforall x (Liver(x) and Breathed(x) -> Nicene(x))\nforall x (Breathed(x) and Disabled(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Nicene(x) and Disabled(x) -> Breathed(x))\nCovalent(deb) and Aired(deb) -> Disabled(deb)\n\nnot Nicene(elizabeth)\n\nLiver(elizabeth) and Breathed(elizabeth) and forall x (Liver(x) and Breathed(x) -> Nicene(x)) -> therefore Nicene(elizabeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Kenna is robustious. Kenna is frightened. Kenna is hairless. Kenna is buttony. Godard is frightened. Godard is hairless. Godard is unhearable. Godard is minus. Marika is unhearable. Marika is minus. Marika is buttony. Marika is travelable. All buttony, frightened things are hairless. If something is travelable then it is frightened. Nice, buttony things are unhearable. If Kenna is unhearable then Kenna is buttony. If something is frightened and hairless then it is robustious. All hairless, buttony things are travelable. If something is robustious and buttony then it is hairless. If Kenna is minus and Kenna is travelable then Kenna is buttony. Marika is hairless.", "logic": "\nRobustious(kenna)\nFrightened(kenna)\nHairless(kenna)\nButtony(kenna)\nFrightened(godard)\nHairless(godard)\nUnhearable(godard)\nMinus(godard)\nUnhearable(marika)\nMinus(marika)\nButtony(marika)\nTravelable(marika)\nforall x (Buttony(x) and Frightened(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Travelable(x) -> Frightened(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) and Buttony(x) -> Unhearable(x))\nUnhearable(kenna) -> Buttony(kenna)\nforall x (Frightened(x) and Hairless(x) -> Robustious(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) and Buttony(x) -> Travelable(x))\nforall x (Robustious(x) and Buttony(x) -> Hairless(x))\nMinus(kenna) and Travelable(kenna) -> Buttony(kenna)\n\nHairless(marika)\n\nTravelable(marika) and forall x (Travelable(x) -> Frightened(x)) -> therefore Frightened(marika) Buttony(marika) and Frightened(marika) and forall x (Buttony(x) and Frightened(x) -> Hairless(x)) -> therefore Hairless(marika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Amalee is hulking. Amalee is semiliquid. Amalee is disgraced. Amalee is placental. Fina is semiliquid. Fina is disgraced. Fina is ferrous. Fina is bonelike. Marsiella is ferrous. Marsiella is bonelike. Marsiella is placental. Marsiella is absorbent. All placental, semiliquid things are disgraced. If something is absorbent then it is semiliquid. Nice, placental things are ferrous. If Amalee is ferrous then Amalee is placental. If something is semiliquid and disgraced then it is hulking. All disgraced, placental things are absorbent. If something is hulking and placental then it is disgraced. If Amalee is bonelike and Amalee is absorbent then Amalee is placental. Marsiella is not disgraced.", "logic": "\nHulking(amalee)\nSemiliquid(amalee)\nDisgraced(amalee)\nPlacental(amalee)\nSemiliquid(fina)\nDisgraced(fina)\nFerrous(fina)\nBonelike(fina)\nFerrous(marsiella)\nBonelike(marsiella)\nPlacental(marsiella)\nAbsorbent(marsiella)\nforall x (Placental(x) and Semiliquid(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Absorbent(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) and Placental(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nFerrous(amalee) -> Placental(amalee)\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Disgraced(x) -> Hulking(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) and Placental(x) -> Absorbent(x))\nforall x (Hulking(x) and Placental(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nBonelike(amalee) and Absorbent(amalee) -> Placental(amalee)\n\nnot Disgraced(marsiella)\n\nAbsorbent(marsiella) and forall x (Absorbent(x) -> Semiliquid(x)) -> therefore Semiliquid(marsiella) Placental(marsiella) and Semiliquid(marsiella) and forall x (Placental(x) and Semiliquid(x) -> Disgraced(x)) -> therefore Disgraced(marsiella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Manya is privy. Manya is reverting. Manya is gonzo. Manya is untucked. Jed is reverting. Jed is gonzo. Jed is agrarian. Jed is polychrome. Sheela is agrarian. Sheela is polychrome. Sheela is untucked. Sheela is turbulent. All untucked, reverting things are gonzo. If something is turbulent then it is reverting. Nice, untucked things are agrarian. If Manya is agrarian then Manya is untucked. If something is reverting and gonzo then it is privy. All gonzo, untucked things are turbulent. If something is privy and untucked then it is gonzo. If Manya is polychrome and Manya is turbulent then Manya is untucked. Sheela is privy.", "logic": "\nPrivy(manya)\nReverting(manya)\nGonzo(manya)\nUntucked(manya)\nReverting(jed)\nGonzo(jed)\nAgrarian(jed)\nPolychrome(jed)\nAgrarian(sheela)\nPolychrome(sheela)\nUntucked(sheela)\nTurbulent(sheela)\nforall x (Untucked(x) and Reverting(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nforall x (Turbulent(x) -> Reverting(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) and Untucked(x) -> Agrarian(x))\nAgrarian(manya) -> Untucked(manya)\nforall x (Reverting(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Privy(x))\nforall x (Gonzo(x) and Untucked(x) -> Turbulent(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) and Untucked(x) -> Gonzo(x))\nPolychrome(manya) and Turbulent(manya) -> Untucked(manya)\n\nPrivy(sheela)\n\nTurbulent(sheela) and forall x (Turbulent(x) -> Reverting(x)) -> therefore Reverting(sheela) Turbulent(sheela) and forall x (Turbulent(x) -> Reverting(x)) -> therefore Reverting(sheela) Untucked(sheela) and Reverting(sheela) and forall x (Untucked(x) and Reverting(x) -> Gonzo(x)) -> therefore Gonzo(sheela) Reverting(sheela) and Gonzo(sheela) and forall x (Reverting(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Privy(x)) -> therefore Privy(sheela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Esme is aboral. Esme is aslope. Esme is frankish. Esme is tagged. Jethro is aslope. Jethro is frankish. Jethro is financial. Jethro is mistaken. Donn is financial. Donn is mistaken. Donn is tagged. Donn is basined. All tagged, aslope things are frankish. If something is basined then it is aslope. Nice, tagged things are financial. If Esme is financial then Esme is tagged. If something is aslope and frankish then it is aboral. All frankish, tagged things are basined. If something is aboral and tagged then it is frankish. If Esme is mistaken and Esme is basined then Esme is tagged. Donn is not aboral.", "logic": "\nAboral(esme)\nAslope(esme)\nFrankish(esme)\nTagged(esme)\nAslope(jethro)\nFrankish(jethro)\nFinancial(jethro)\nMistaken(jethro)\nFinancial(donn)\nMistaken(donn)\nTagged(donn)\nBasined(donn)\nforall x (Tagged(x) and Aslope(x) -> Frankish(x))\nforall x (Basined(x) -> Aslope(x))\nforall x (Frankish(x) and Tagged(x) -> Financial(x))\nFinancial(esme) -> Tagged(esme)\nforall x (Aslope(x) and Frankish(x) -> Aboral(x))\nforall x (Frankish(x) and Tagged(x) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Aboral(x) and Tagged(x) -> Frankish(x))\nMistaken(esme) and Basined(esme) -> Tagged(esme)\n\nnot Aboral(donn)\n\nBasined(donn) and forall x (Basined(x) -> Aslope(x)) -> therefore Aslope(donn) Basined(donn) and forall x (Basined(x) -> Aslope(x)) -> therefore Aslope(donn) Tagged(donn) and Aslope(donn) and forall x (Tagged(x) and Aslope(x) -> Frankish(x)) -> therefore Frankish(donn) Aslope(donn) and Frankish(donn) and forall x (Aslope(x) and Frankish(x) -> Aboral(x)) -> therefore Aboral(donn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Gwenni is sympatric. Gwenni is thieving. Gwenni is ageless. Gwenni is shallow. Cacilia is thieving. Cacilia is ageless. Cacilia is lossless. Cacilia is adrift. Srinivas is lossless. Srinivas is adrift. Srinivas is shallow. Srinivas is probatory. All shallow, thieving things are ageless. If something is probatory then it is thieving. Nice, shallow things are lossless. If Gwenni is lossless then Gwenni is shallow. If something is thieving and ageless then it is sympatric. All ageless, shallow things are probatory. If something is sympatric and shallow then it is ageless. If Gwenni is adrift and Gwenni is probatory then Gwenni is shallow. Cacilia is not probatory.", "logic": "\nSympatric(gwenni)\nThieving(gwenni)\nAgeless(gwenni)\nShallow(gwenni)\nThieving(cacilia)\nAgeless(cacilia)\nLossless(cacilia)\nAdrift(cacilia)\nLossless(srinivas)\nAdrift(srinivas)\nShallow(srinivas)\nProbatory(srinivas)\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Thieving(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Probatory(x) -> Thieving(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) and Shallow(x) -> Lossless(x))\nLossless(gwenni) -> Shallow(gwenni)\nforall x (Thieving(x) and Ageless(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Ageless(x) and Shallow(x) -> Probatory(x))\nforall x (Sympatric(x) and Shallow(x) -> Ageless(x))\nAdrift(gwenni) and Probatory(gwenni) -> Shallow(gwenni)\n\nnot Probatory(cacilia)\n\nforall x (Ageless(x) and Shallow(x) -> Probatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Mariya is chemical. Mariya is anaphasic. Mariya is steamy. Mariya is pecuniary. Thorny is anaphasic. Thorny is steamy. Thorny is valent. Thorny is craggy. Chase is valent. Chase is craggy. Chase is pecuniary. Chase is ungallant. All pecuniary, anaphasic things are steamy. If something is ungallant then it is anaphasic. Nice, pecuniary things are valent. If Mariya is valent then Mariya is pecuniary. If something is anaphasic and steamy then it is chemical. All steamy, pecuniary things are ungallant. If something is chemical and pecuniary then it is steamy. If Mariya is craggy and Mariya is ungallant then Mariya is pecuniary. Thorny is pecuniary.", "logic": "\nChemical(mariya)\nAnaphasic(mariya)\nSteamy(mariya)\nPecuniary(mariya)\nAnaphasic(thorny)\nSteamy(thorny)\nValent(thorny)\nCraggy(thorny)\nValent(chase)\nCraggy(chase)\nPecuniary(chase)\nUngallant(chase)\nforall x (Pecuniary(x) and Anaphasic(x) -> Steamy(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) -> Anaphasic(x))\nforall x (Steamy(x) and Pecuniary(x) -> Valent(x))\nValent(mariya) -> Pecuniary(mariya)\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Steamy(x) -> Chemical(x))\nforall x (Steamy(x) and Pecuniary(x) -> Ungallant(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) and Pecuniary(x) -> Steamy(x))\nCraggy(mariya) and Ungallant(mariya) -> Pecuniary(mariya)\n\nPecuniary(thorny)\n\nPecuniary(thorny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1606"} {"premises": "Ahmet is archival. Guthrey is ribbonlike. Guthrey is archival. If something is holophytic then it is archival. If Guthrey is archival then Guthrey is dishy. If something is dishy and wealthy then it is textured. If something is ribbonlike and archival then it is unreactive. Cold, dishy things are archival. If Ahmet is ribbonlike and Ahmet is unreactive then Ahmet is holophytic. All holophytic, ribbonlike things are dishy. If something is ribbonlike and unreactive then it is wealthy. Ahmet is archival.", "logic": "\nArchival(ahmet)\nRibbonlike(guthrey)\nArchival(guthrey)\nforall x (Holophytic(x) -> Archival(x))\nArchival(guthrey) -> Dishy(guthrey)\nforall x (Dishy(x) and Wealthy(x) -> Textured(x))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Archival(x) -> Unreactive(x))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Dishy(x) -> Archival(x))\nRibbonlike(ahmet) and Unreactive(ahmet) -> Holophytic(ahmet)\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Ribbonlike(x) -> Dishy(x))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Unreactive(x) -> Wealthy(x))\n\nArchival(ahmet)\n\ntherefore Archival(ahmet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Erma is wonderful. Sigfried is recent. Sigfried is wonderful. If something is observable then it is wonderful. If Sigfried is wonderful then Sigfried is catamenial. If something is catamenial and sisterlike then it is next. If something is recent and wonderful then it is lucent. Cold, catamenial things are wonderful. If Erma is recent and Erma is lucent then Erma is observable. All observable, recent things are catamenial. If something is recent and lucent then it is sisterlike. Sigfried is not wonderful.", "logic": "\nWonderful(erma)\nRecent(sigfried)\nWonderful(sigfried)\nforall x (Observable(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nWonderful(sigfried) -> Catamenial(sigfried)\nforall x (Catamenial(x) and Sisterlike(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Wonderful(x) -> Lucent(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Catamenial(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nRecent(erma) and Lucent(erma) -> Observable(erma)\nforall x (Observable(x) and Recent(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Recent(x) and Lucent(x) -> Sisterlike(x))\n\nnot Wonderful(sigfried)\n\ntherefore Wonderful(sigfried)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Xenia is cliched. Bertine is global. Bertine is cliched. If something is rabid then it is cliched. If Bertine is cliched then Bertine is deathlike. If something is deathlike and disposed then it is witting. If something is global and cliched then it is mute. Cold, deathlike things are cliched. If Xenia is global and Xenia is mute then Xenia is rabid. All rabid, global things are deathlike. If something is global and mute then it is disposed. Bertine is mute.", "logic": "\nCliched(xenia)\nGlobal(bertine)\nCliched(bertine)\nforall x (Rabid(x) -> Cliched(x))\nCliched(bertine) -> Deathlike(bertine)\nforall x (Deathlike(x) and Disposed(x) -> Witting(x))\nforall x (Global(x) and Cliched(x) -> Mute(x))\nforall x (Global(x) and Deathlike(x) -> Cliched(x))\nGlobal(xenia) and Mute(xenia) -> Rabid(xenia)\nforall x (Rabid(x) and Global(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Global(x) and Mute(x) -> Disposed(x))\n\nMute(bertine)\n\nGlobal(bertine) and Cliched(bertine) and forall x (Global(x) and Cliched(x) -> Mute(x)) -> therefore Mute(bertine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Norwood is fricative. Dunc is magnetised. Dunc is fricative. If something is allantoic then it is fricative. If Dunc is fricative then Dunc is penitent. If something is penitent and platonic then it is heady. If something is magnetised and fricative then it is violet. Cold, penitent things are fricative. If Norwood is magnetised and Norwood is violet then Norwood is allantoic. All allantoic, magnetised things are penitent. If something is magnetised and violet then it is platonic. Dunc is not penitent.", "logic": "\nFricative(norwood)\nMagnetised(dunc)\nFricative(dunc)\nforall x (Allantoic(x) -> Fricative(x))\nFricative(dunc) -> Penitent(dunc)\nforall x (Penitent(x) and Platonic(x) -> Heady(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) and Fricative(x) -> Violet(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) and Penitent(x) -> Fricative(x))\nMagnetised(norwood) and Violet(norwood) -> Allantoic(norwood)\nforall x (Allantoic(x) and Magnetised(x) -> Penitent(x))\nforall x (Magnetised(x) and Violet(x) -> Platonic(x))\n\nnot Penitent(dunc)\n\nFricative(dunc) and Fricative(dunc) -> Penitent(dunc) -> therefore Penitent(dunc)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Isis is unary. Krissie is sandpapery. Krissie is unary. If something is connubial then it is unary. If Krissie is unary then Krissie is flying. If something is flying and unmoving then it is champleve. If something is sandpapery and unary then it is imprudent. Cold, flying things are unary. If Isis is sandpapery and Isis is imprudent then Isis is connubial. All connubial, sandpapery things are flying. If something is sandpapery and imprudent then it is unmoving. Krissie is unmoving.", "logic": "\nUnary(isis)\nSandpapery(krissie)\nUnary(krissie)\nforall x (Connubial(x) -> Unary(x))\nUnary(krissie) -> Flying(krissie)\nforall x (Flying(x) and Unmoving(x) -> Champleve(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Unary(x) -> Imprudent(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Flying(x) -> Unary(x))\nSandpapery(isis) and Imprudent(isis) -> Connubial(isis)\nforall x (Connubial(x) and Sandpapery(x) -> Flying(x))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Imprudent(x) -> Unmoving(x))\n\nUnmoving(krissie)\n\nSandpapery(krissie) and Unary(krissie) and forall x (Sandpapery(x) and Unary(x) -> Imprudent(x)) -> therefore Imprudent(krissie) Sandpapery(krissie) and Imprudent(krissie) and forall x (Sandpapery(x) and Imprudent(x) -> Unmoving(x)) -> therefore Unmoving(krissie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Roderich is foaming. Maynord is bubaline. Maynord is foaming. If something is touched then it is foaming. If Maynord is foaming then Maynord is dented. If something is dented and shared then it is obsessed. If something is bubaline and foaming then it is britannic. Cold, dented things are foaming. If Roderich is bubaline and Roderich is britannic then Roderich is touched. All touched, bubaline things are dented. If something is bubaline and britannic then it is shared. Maynord is not shared.", "logic": "\nFoaming(roderich)\nBubaline(maynord)\nFoaming(maynord)\nforall x (Touched(x) -> Foaming(x))\nFoaming(maynord) -> Dented(maynord)\nforall x (Dented(x) and Shared(x) -> Obsessed(x))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) and Foaming(x) -> Britannic(x))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) and Dented(x) -> Foaming(x))\nBubaline(roderich) and Britannic(roderich) -> Touched(roderich)\nforall x (Touched(x) and Bubaline(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Bubaline(x) and Britannic(x) -> Shared(x))\n\nnot Shared(maynord)\n\nBubaline(maynord) and Foaming(maynord) and forall x (Bubaline(x) and Foaming(x) -> Britannic(x)) -> therefore Britannic(maynord) Bubaline(maynord) and Britannic(maynord) and forall x (Bubaline(x) and Britannic(x) -> Shared(x)) -> therefore Shared(maynord)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Emyle is rhetorical. Elisha is cured. Elisha is rhetorical. If something is avascular then it is rhetorical. If Elisha is rhetorical then Elisha is interfaith. If something is interfaith and neoplastic then it is nontoxic. If something is cured and rhetorical then it is suffering. Cold, interfaith things are rhetorical. If Emyle is cured and Emyle is suffering then Emyle is avascular. All avascular, cured things are interfaith. If something is cured and suffering then it is neoplastic. Emyle is not neoplastic.", "logic": "\nRhetorical(emyle)\nCured(elisha)\nRhetorical(elisha)\nforall x (Avascular(x) -> Rhetorical(x))\nRhetorical(elisha) -> Interfaith(elisha)\nforall x (Interfaith(x) and Neoplastic(x) -> Nontoxic(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) and Rhetorical(x) -> Suffering(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) and Interfaith(x) -> Rhetorical(x))\nCured(emyle) and Suffering(emyle) -> Avascular(emyle)\nforall x (Avascular(x) and Cured(x) -> Interfaith(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) and Suffering(x) -> Neoplastic(x))\n\nnot Neoplastic(emyle)\n\nforall x (Cured(x) and Suffering(x) -> Neoplastic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Halimeda is arrayed. Lainey is amended. Lainey is arrayed. If something is lifesize then it is arrayed. If Lainey is arrayed then Lainey is visible. If something is visible and ready then it is titillated. If something is amended and arrayed then it is spurned. Cold, visible things are arrayed. If Halimeda is amended and Halimeda is spurned then Halimeda is lifesize. All lifesize, amended things are visible. If something is amended and spurned then it is ready. Halimeda is visible.", "logic": "\nArrayed(halimeda)\nAmended(lainey)\nArrayed(lainey)\nforall x (Lifesize(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nArrayed(lainey) -> Visible(lainey)\nforall x (Visible(x) and Ready(x) -> Titillated(x))\nforall x (Amended(x) and Arrayed(x) -> Spurned(x))\nforall x (Amended(x) and Visible(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nAmended(halimeda) and Spurned(halimeda) -> Lifesize(halimeda)\nforall x (Lifesize(x) and Amended(x) -> Visible(x))\nforall x (Amended(x) and Spurned(x) -> Ready(x))\n\nVisible(halimeda)\n\nforall x (Lifesize(x) and Amended(x) -> Visible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Scot is unmarked. Flossi is nidicolous. Flossi is unmarked. If something is mindless then it is unmarked. If Flossi is unmarked then Flossi is unspoken. If something is unspoken and albitic then it is abounding. If something is nidicolous and unmarked then it is snarled. Cold, unspoken things are unmarked. If Scot is nidicolous and Scot is snarled then Scot is mindless. All mindless, nidicolous things are unspoken. If something is nidicolous and snarled then it is albitic. Scot is not mindless.", "logic": "\nUnmarked(scot)\nNidicolous(flossi)\nUnmarked(flossi)\nforall x (Mindless(x) -> Unmarked(x))\nUnmarked(flossi) -> Unspoken(flossi)\nforall x (Unspoken(x) and Albitic(x) -> Abounding(x))\nforall x (Nidicolous(x) and Unmarked(x) -> Snarled(x))\nforall x (Nidicolous(x) and Unspoken(x) -> Unmarked(x))\nNidicolous(scot) and Snarled(scot) -> Mindless(scot)\nforall x (Mindless(x) and Nidicolous(x) -> Unspoken(x))\nforall x (Nidicolous(x) and Snarled(x) -> Albitic(x))\n\nnot Mindless(scot)\n\nNidicolous(scot) and Snarled(scot) -> Mindless(scot) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Toddy is pilary. Keefe is high. Keefe is pilary. If something is jolted then it is pilary. If Keefe is pilary then Keefe is maniac. If something is maniac and moorish then it is precocial. If something is high and pilary then it is ropy. Cold, maniac things are pilary. If Toddy is high and Toddy is ropy then Toddy is jolted. All jolted, high things are maniac. If something is high and ropy then it is moorish. Toddy is high.", "logic": "\nPilary(toddy)\nHigh(keefe)\nPilary(keefe)\nforall x (Jolted(x) -> Pilary(x))\nPilary(keefe) -> Maniac(keefe)\nforall x (Maniac(x) and Moorish(x) -> Precocial(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Pilary(x) -> Ropy(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Maniac(x) -> Pilary(x))\nHigh(toddy) and Ropy(toddy) -> Jolted(toddy)\nforall x (Jolted(x) and High(x) -> Maniac(x))\nforall x (High(x) and Ropy(x) -> Moorish(x))\n\nHigh(toddy)\n\nHigh(toddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1160"} {"premises": "Valma is thin. Nerty is not amygdaline. Big things are vocative. Young things are undersea. If something is vocative and amygdaline then it is undersea. If something is bibbed and not thin then it is buttonlike. If something is amygdaline then it is buttonlike. If something is vocative and not thin then it is amygdaline. If something is undersea and thin then it is bibbed. If Nerty is thin and Nerty is not bibbed then Nerty is not buttonlike. Nerty is not amygdaline.", "logic": "\nThin(valma)\nnot Amygdaline(nerty)\nforall x (Bibbed(x) -> Vocative(x))\nforall x (Thin(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Vocative(x) and Amygdaline(x) -> Undersea(x))\nforall x (Bibbed(x) and not Thin(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nforall x (Amygdaline(x) -> Buttonlike(x))\nforall x (Vocative(x) and not Thin(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\nforall x (Undersea(x) and Thin(x) -> Bibbed(x))\nThin(nerty) and not Bibbed(nerty) -> not Buttonlike(nerty)\n\nnot Amygdaline(nerty)\n\ntherefore not Amygdaline(nerty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Cristina is funded. Oberon is not prodigious. Big things are hurt. Young things are nipping. If something is hurt and prodigious then it is nipping. If something is shrieked and not funded then it is appetitive. If something is prodigious then it is appetitive. If something is hurt and not funded then it is prodigious. If something is nipping and funded then it is shrieked. If Oberon is funded and Oberon is not shrieked then Oberon is not appetitive. Oberon is prodigious.", "logic": "\nFunded(cristina)\nnot Prodigious(oberon)\nforall x (Shrieked(x) -> Hurt(x))\nforall x (Funded(x) -> Nipping(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) and Prodigious(x) -> Nipping(x))\nforall x (Shrieked(x) and not Funded(x) -> Appetitive(x))\nforall x (Prodigious(x) -> Appetitive(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) and not Funded(x) -> Prodigious(x))\nforall x (Nipping(x) and Funded(x) -> Shrieked(x))\nFunded(oberon) and not Shrieked(oberon) -> not Appetitive(oberon)\n\nProdigious(oberon)\n\ntherefore not Prodigious(oberon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Zary is xxxv. Griffin is not hatted. Big things are reigning. Young things are spirant. If something is reigning and hatted then it is spirant. If something is ammoniacal and not xxxv then it is brazen. If something is hatted then it is brazen. If something is reigning and not xxxv then it is hatted. If something is spirant and xxxv then it is ammoniacal. If Griffin is xxxv and Griffin is not ammoniacal then Griffin is not brazen. Zary is spirant.", "logic": "\nXxxv(zary)\nnot Hatted(griffin)\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) -> Reigning(x))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) -> Spirant(x))\nforall x (Reigning(x) and Hatted(x) -> Spirant(x))\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) and not Xxxv(x) -> Brazen(x))\nforall x (Hatted(x) -> Brazen(x))\nforall x (Reigning(x) and not Xxxv(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Spirant(x) and Xxxv(x) -> Ammoniacal(x))\nXxxv(griffin) and not Ammoniacal(griffin) -> not Brazen(griffin)\n\nSpirant(zary)\n\nXxxv(zary) and forall x (Xxxv(x) -> Spirant(x)) -> therefore Spirant(zary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Angie is formal. Jacinda is not clear. Big things are superable. Young things are premedical. If something is superable and clear then it is premedical. If something is peaceable and not formal then it is dividable. If something is clear then it is dividable. If something is superable and not formal then it is clear. If something is premedical and formal then it is peaceable. If Jacinda is formal and Jacinda is not peaceable then Jacinda is not dividable. Angie is not premedical.", "logic": "\nFormal(angie)\nnot Clear(jacinda)\nforall x (Peaceable(x) -> Superable(x))\nforall x (Formal(x) -> Premedical(x))\nforall x (Superable(x) and Clear(x) -> Premedical(x))\nforall x (Peaceable(x) and not Formal(x) -> Dividable(x))\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Dividable(x))\nforall x (Superable(x) and not Formal(x) -> Clear(x))\nforall x (Premedical(x) and Formal(x) -> Peaceable(x))\nFormal(jacinda) and not Peaceable(jacinda) -> not Dividable(jacinda)\n\nnot Premedical(angie)\n\nFormal(angie) and forall x (Formal(x) -> Premedical(x)) -> therefore Premedical(angie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Danika is appointed. Carlita is not zodiacal. Big things are inboard. Young things are ceramic. If something is inboard and zodiacal then it is ceramic. If something is unwedded and not appointed then it is umbellar. If something is zodiacal then it is umbellar. If something is inboard and not appointed then it is zodiacal. If something is ceramic and appointed then it is unwedded. If Carlita is appointed and Carlita is not unwedded then Carlita is not umbellar. Danika is unwedded.", "logic": "\nAppointed(danika)\nnot Zodiacal(carlita)\nforall x (Unwedded(x) -> Inboard(x))\nforall x (Appointed(x) -> Ceramic(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) and Zodiacal(x) -> Ceramic(x))\nforall x (Unwedded(x) and not Appointed(x) -> Umbellar(x))\nforall x (Zodiacal(x) -> Umbellar(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) and not Appointed(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\nforall x (Ceramic(x) and Appointed(x) -> Unwedded(x))\nAppointed(carlita) and not Unwedded(carlita) -> not Umbellar(carlita)\n\nUnwedded(danika)\n\nAppointed(danika) and forall x (Appointed(x) -> Ceramic(x)) -> therefore Ceramic(danika) Ceramic(danika) and Appointed(danika) and forall x (Ceramic(x) and Appointed(x) -> Unwedded(x)) -> therefore Unwedded(danika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Agathe is unbiassed. Ramsay is not teasing. Big things are heroic. Young things are alimentary. If something is heroic and teasing then it is alimentary. If something is mesophytic and not unbiassed then it is miffed. If something is teasing then it is miffed. If something is heroic and not unbiassed then it is teasing. If something is alimentary and unbiassed then it is mesophytic. If Ramsay is unbiassed and Ramsay is not mesophytic then Ramsay is not miffed. Agathe is not mesophytic.", "logic": "\nUnbiassed(agathe)\nnot Teasing(ramsay)\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) -> Heroic(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Alimentary(x))\nforall x (Heroic(x) and Teasing(x) -> Alimentary(x))\nforall x (Mesophytic(x) and not Unbiassed(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Teasing(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Heroic(x) and not Unbiassed(x) -> Teasing(x))\nforall x (Alimentary(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Mesophytic(x))\nUnbiassed(ramsay) and not Mesophytic(ramsay) -> not Miffed(ramsay)\n\nnot Mesophytic(agathe)\n\nUnbiassed(agathe) and forall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Alimentary(x)) -> therefore Alimentary(agathe) Alimentary(agathe) and Unbiassed(agathe) and forall x (Alimentary(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Mesophytic(x)) -> therefore Mesophytic(agathe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Haley is maverick. Oralle is not exogenic. Big things are alliaceous. Young things are indexical. If something is alliaceous and exogenic then it is indexical. If something is gimpy and not maverick then it is marital. If something is exogenic then it is marital. If something is alliaceous and not maverick then it is exogenic. If something is indexical and maverick then it is gimpy. If Oralle is maverick and Oralle is not gimpy then Oralle is not marital. Haley is alliaceous.", "logic": "\nMaverick(haley)\nnot Exogenic(oralle)\nforall x (Gimpy(x) -> Alliaceous(x))\nforall x (Maverick(x) -> Indexical(x))\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) and Exogenic(x) -> Indexical(x))\nforall x (Gimpy(x) and not Maverick(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Alliaceous(x) and not Maverick(x) -> Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Indexical(x) and Maverick(x) -> Gimpy(x))\nMaverick(oralle) and not Gimpy(oralle) -> not Marital(oralle)\n\nAlliaceous(haley)\n\nMaverick(haley) and forall x (Maverick(x) -> Indexical(x)) -> therefore Indexical(haley) Indexical(haley) and Maverick(haley) and forall x (Indexical(x) and Maverick(x) -> Gimpy(x)) -> therefore Gimpy(haley) Gimpy(haley) and forall x (Gimpy(x) -> Alliaceous(x)) -> therefore Alliaceous(haley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Malorie is fatuous. Harwell is not vain. Big things are puzzling. Young things are drunk. If something is puzzling and vain then it is drunk. If something is sunburnt and not fatuous then it is xanthous. If something is vain then it is xanthous. If something is puzzling and not fatuous then it is vain. If something is drunk and fatuous then it is sunburnt. If Harwell is fatuous and Harwell is not sunburnt then Harwell is not xanthous. Malorie is not puzzling.", "logic": "\nFatuous(malorie)\nnot Vain(harwell)\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Puzzling(x))\nforall x (Fatuous(x) -> Drunk(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) and Vain(x) -> Drunk(x))\nforall x (Sunburnt(x) and not Fatuous(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Vain(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Puzzling(x) and not Fatuous(x) -> Vain(x))\nforall x (Drunk(x) and Fatuous(x) -> Sunburnt(x))\nFatuous(harwell) and not Sunburnt(harwell) -> not Xanthous(harwell)\n\nnot Puzzling(malorie)\n\nFatuous(malorie) and forall x (Fatuous(x) -> Drunk(x)) -> therefore Drunk(malorie) Drunk(malorie) and Fatuous(malorie) and forall x (Drunk(x) and Fatuous(x) -> Sunburnt(x)) -> therefore Sunburnt(malorie) Sunburnt(malorie) and forall x (Sunburnt(x) -> Puzzling(x)) -> therefore Puzzling(malorie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Maddi is eclectic. Lionello is not nitid. Big things are countless. Young things are gaudy. If something is countless and nitid then it is gaudy. If something is ineligible and not eclectic then it is dished. If something is nitid then it is dished. If something is countless and not eclectic then it is nitid. If something is gaudy and eclectic then it is ineligible. If Lionello is eclectic and Lionello is not ineligible then Lionello is not dished. Maddi is not dished.", "logic": "\nEclectic(maddi)\nnot Nitid(lionello)\nforall x (Ineligible(x) -> Countless(x))\nforall x (Eclectic(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Countless(x) and Nitid(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Ineligible(x) and not Eclectic(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Nitid(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Countless(x) and not Eclectic(x) -> Nitid(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Eclectic(x) -> Ineligible(x))\nEclectic(lionello) and not Ineligible(lionello) -> not Dished(lionello)\n\nnot Dished(maddi)\n\nforall x (Nitid(x) -> Dished(x)) <- forall x (Countless(x) and not Eclectic(x) -> Nitid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Bruce is reported. Charissa is not chanted. Big things are civic. Young things are dried. If something is civic and chanted then it is dried. If something is flavorsome and not reported then it is damp. If something is chanted then it is damp. If something is civic and not reported then it is chanted. If something is dried and reported then it is flavorsome. If Charissa is reported and Charissa is not flavorsome then Charissa is not damp. Charissa is flavorsome.", "logic": "\nReported(bruce)\nnot Chanted(charissa)\nforall x (Flavorsome(x) -> Civic(x))\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Dried(x))\nforall x (Civic(x) and Chanted(x) -> Dried(x))\nforall x (Flavorsome(x) and not Reported(x) -> Damp(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Damp(x))\nforall x (Civic(x) and not Reported(x) -> Chanted(x))\nforall x (Dried(x) and Reported(x) -> Flavorsome(x))\nReported(charissa) and not Flavorsome(charissa) -> not Damp(charissa)\n\nFlavorsome(charissa)\n\nforall x (Dried(x) and Reported(x) -> Flavorsome(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Jody is judgmental. Hetti is not metonymic. Big things are mucinoid. Young things are carbonyl. If something is mucinoid and metonymic then it is carbonyl. If something is henpecked and not judgmental then it is pert. If something is metonymic then it is pert. If something is mucinoid and not judgmental then it is metonymic. If something is carbonyl and judgmental then it is henpecked. If Hetti is judgmental and Hetti is not henpecked then Hetti is not pert. Hetti is not carbonyl.", "logic": "\nJudgmental(jody)\nnot Metonymic(hetti)\nforall x (Henpecked(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) and Metonymic(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\nforall x (Henpecked(x) and not Judgmental(x) -> Pert(x))\nforall x (Metonymic(x) -> Pert(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) and not Judgmental(x) -> Metonymic(x))\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) and Judgmental(x) -> Henpecked(x))\nJudgmental(hetti) and not Henpecked(hetti) -> not Pert(hetti)\n\nnot Carbonyl(hetti)\n\nforall x (Judgmental(x) -> Carbonyl(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Leon is sunny. Carlotta is not isotonic. Big things are unuseable. Young things are inshore. If something is unuseable and isotonic then it is inshore. If something is matt and not sunny then it is scornful. If something is isotonic then it is scornful. If something is unuseable and not sunny then it is isotonic. If something is inshore and sunny then it is matt. If Carlotta is sunny and Carlotta is not matt then Carlotta is not scornful. Leon is isotonic.", "logic": "\nSunny(leon)\nnot Isotonic(carlotta)\nforall x (Matt(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Sunny(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) and Isotonic(x) -> Inshore(x))\nforall x (Matt(x) and not Sunny(x) -> Scornful(x))\nforall x (Isotonic(x) -> Scornful(x))\nforall x (Unuseable(x) and not Sunny(x) -> Isotonic(x))\nforall x (Inshore(x) and Sunny(x) -> Matt(x))\nSunny(carlotta) and not Matt(carlotta) -> not Scornful(carlotta)\n\nIsotonic(leon)\n\nforall x (Unuseable(x) and not Sunny(x) -> Isotonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Essy is operculate. Georges is not raring. Big things are unfledged. Young things are ionised. If something is unfledged and raring then it is ionised. If something is acapnic and not operculate then it is metabolic. If something is raring then it is metabolic. If something is unfledged and not operculate then it is raring. If something is ionised and operculate then it is acapnic. If Georges is operculate and Georges is not acapnic then Georges is not metabolic. Essy is not nice.", "logic": "\nOperculate(essy)\nnot Raring(georges)\nforall x (Acapnic(x) -> Unfledged(x))\nforall x (Operculate(x) -> Ionised(x))\nforall x (Unfledged(x) and Raring(x) -> Ionised(x))\nforall x (Acapnic(x) and not Operculate(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Raring(x) -> Metabolic(x))\nforall x (Unfledged(x) and not Operculate(x) -> Raring(x))\nforall x (Ionised(x) and Operculate(x) -> Acapnic(x))\nOperculate(georges) and not Acapnic(georges) -> not Metabolic(georges)\n\nnot Nice(essy)\n\nnot Nice(essy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Katleen is diadromous. Michele is not midi. Big things are herculean. Young things are captive. If something is herculean and midi then it is captive. If something is grovelling and not diadromous then it is beloved. If something is midi then it is beloved. If something is herculean and not diadromous then it is midi. If something is captive and diadromous then it is grovelling. If Michele is diadromous and Michele is not grovelling then Michele is not beloved. Michele is nice.", "logic": "\nDiadromous(katleen)\nnot Midi(michele)\nforall x (Grovelling(x) -> Herculean(x))\nforall x (Diadromous(x) -> Captive(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) and Midi(x) -> Captive(x))\nforall x (Grovelling(x) and not Diadromous(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Midi(x) -> Beloved(x))\nforall x (Herculean(x) and not Diadromous(x) -> Midi(x))\nforall x (Captive(x) and Diadromous(x) -> Grovelling(x))\nDiadromous(michele) and not Grovelling(michele) -> not Beloved(michele)\n\nNice(michele)\n\nNice(michele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-592"} {"premises": "Jessey is broad. Jessey is electronic. Jessey is premiere. Jessey is farming. Jessey is unmixable. Jessey is farseeing. Jessey is swayback. Rough people are electronic. If Jessey is farseeing then Jessey is swayback. All farseeing people are swayback. Jessey is broad.", "logic": "\nBroad(jessey)\nElectronic(jessey)\nPremiere(jessey)\nFarming(jessey)\nUnmixable(jessey)\nFarseeing(jessey)\nSwayback(jessey)\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Electronic(x))\nFarseeing(jessey) -> Swayback(jessey)\nforall x (Farseeing(x) -> Swayback(x))\n\nBroad(jessey)\n\ntherefore Broad(jessey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7228"} {"premises": "Charmian is sprawling. Charmian is uncrowded. Charmian is anecdotic. Charmian is frowzled. Charmian is crumbly. Charmian is unpleasing. Charmian is meaning. Rough people are uncrowded. If Charmian is unpleasing then Charmian is meaning. All unpleasing people are meaning. Charmian is not meaning.", "logic": "\nSprawling(charmian)\nUncrowded(charmian)\nAnecdotic(charmian)\nFrowzled(charmian)\nCrumbly(charmian)\nUnpleasing(charmian)\nMeaning(charmian)\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\nUnpleasing(charmian) -> Meaning(charmian)\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Meaning(x))\n\nnot Meaning(charmian)\n\ntherefore Meaning(charmian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-7228"} {"premises": "The reese does not chase the rudolfo. The reese is listed. The reese is agreeable. The reese wreak the rudolfo. The mariam overcook the imogene. The mariam overcook the rudolfo. The mariam is listed. The mariam wreak the imogene. The mariam wreak the rudolfo. The mariam satisfise the reese. The imogene overcook the reese. The imogene is not agreeable. The imogene wreak the reese. The imogene does not visit the reese. The rudolfo satisfise the mariam. If someone is agreeable and they do not see the mariam then they do not see the reese. If someone wreak the reese and the reese satisfise the rudolfo then the reese satisfise the imogene. If someone satisfise the imogene then they do not chase the imogene. If someone wreak the imogene then they chase the mariam. If someone is listed and they see the rudolfo then the rudolfo wreak the imogene. If someone overcook the rudolfo and they do not see the reese then the rudolfo wreak the imogene. If someone wreak the imogene and the imogene does not chase the rudolfo then the imogene does not chase the mariam. If someone overcook the mariam and they see the reese then the mariam wreak the imogene. The mariam wreak the rudolfo.", "logic": "\nnot Overcook(reese, rudolfo)\nListed(reese)\nAgreeable(reese)\nWreak(reese, rudolfo)\nOvercook(mariam, imogene)\nOvercook(mariam, rudolfo)\nListed(mariam)\nWreak(mariam, imogene)\nWreak(mariam, rudolfo)\nSatisfise(mariam, reese)\nOvercook(imogene, reese)\nnot Agreeable(imogene)\nWreak(imogene, reese)\nnot Satisfise(imogene, reese)\nSatisfise(rudolfo, mariam)\nforall x (Agreeable(x) and not Wreak(x, mariam) -> not Wreak(x, reese))\nforall x (Wreak(x, reese) and Satisfise(reese, rudolfo) -> Satisfise(reese, imogene))\nforall x (Satisfise(x, imogene) -> not Overcook(x, imogene))\nforall x (Wreak(x, imogene) -> Overcook(x, mariam))\nforall x (Listed(x) and Wreak(x, rudolfo) -> Wreak(rudolfo, imogene))\nforall x (Overcook(x, rudolfo) and not Wreak(x, reese) -> Wreak(rudolfo, imogene))\nforall x (Wreak(x, imogene) and not Overcook(imogene, rudolfo) -> not Overcook(imogene, mariam))\nforall x (Overcook(x, mariam) and Wreak(x, reese) -> Wreak(mariam, imogene))\n\nWreak(mariam, rudolfo)\n\ntherefore Wreak(mariam, rudolfo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The nerty does not chase the sharon. The nerty is ribbonlike. The nerty is preventive. The nerty lumber the sharon. The uli praise the serene. The uli praise the sharon. The uli is ribbonlike. The uli lumber the serene. The uli lumber the sharon. The uli equalise the nerty. The serene praise the nerty. The serene is not preventive. The serene lumber the nerty. The serene does not visit the nerty. The sharon equalise the uli. If someone is preventive and they do not see the uli then they do not see the nerty. If someone lumber the nerty and the nerty equalise the sharon then the nerty equalise the serene. If someone equalise the serene then they do not chase the serene. If someone lumber the serene then they chase the uli. If someone is ribbonlike and they see the sharon then the sharon lumber the serene. If someone praise the sharon and they do not see the nerty then the sharon lumber the serene. If someone lumber the serene and the serene does not chase the sharon then the serene does not chase the uli. If someone praise the uli and they see the nerty then the uli lumber the serene. The uli does not chase the sharon.", "logic": "\nnot Praise(nerty, sharon)\nRibbonlike(nerty)\nPreventive(nerty)\nLumber(nerty, sharon)\nPraise(uli, serene)\nPraise(uli, sharon)\nRibbonlike(uli)\nLumber(uli, serene)\nLumber(uli, sharon)\nEqualise(uli, nerty)\nPraise(serene, nerty)\nnot Preventive(serene)\nLumber(serene, nerty)\nnot Equalise(serene, nerty)\nEqualise(sharon, uli)\nforall x (Preventive(x) and not Lumber(x, uli) -> not Lumber(x, nerty))\nforall x (Lumber(x, nerty) and Equalise(nerty, sharon) -> Equalise(nerty, serene))\nforall x (Equalise(x, serene) -> not Praise(x, serene))\nforall x (Lumber(x, serene) -> Praise(x, uli))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Lumber(x, sharon) -> Lumber(sharon, serene))\nforall x (Praise(x, sharon) and not Lumber(x, nerty) -> Lumber(sharon, serene))\nforall x (Lumber(x, serene) and not Praise(serene, sharon) -> not Praise(serene, uli))\nforall x (Praise(x, uli) and Lumber(x, nerty) -> Lumber(uli, serene))\n\nnot Praise(uli, sharon)\n\ntherefore Praise(uli, sharon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The judie does not chase the april. The judie is visualized. The judie is sheeplike. The judie zoom the april. The westleigh vagabond the berke. The westleigh vagabond the april. The westleigh is visualized. The westleigh zoom the berke. The westleigh zoom the april. The westleigh volunteer the judie. The berke vagabond the judie. The berke is not sheeplike. The berke zoom the judie. The berke does not visit the judie. The april volunteer the westleigh. If someone is sheeplike and they do not see the westleigh then they do not see the judie. If someone zoom the judie and the judie volunteer the april then the judie volunteer the berke. If someone volunteer the berke then they do not chase the berke. If someone zoom the berke then they chase the westleigh. If someone is visualized and they see the april then the april zoom the berke. If someone vagabond the april and they do not see the judie then the april zoom the berke. If someone zoom the berke and the berke does not chase the april then the berke does not chase the westleigh. If someone vagabond the westleigh and they see the judie then the westleigh zoom the berke. The april zoom the berke.", "logic": "\nnot Vagabond(judie, april)\nVisualized(judie)\nSheeplike(judie)\nZoom(judie, april)\nVagabond(westleigh, berke)\nVagabond(westleigh, april)\nVisualized(westleigh)\nZoom(westleigh, berke)\nZoom(westleigh, april)\nVolunteer(westleigh, judie)\nVagabond(berke, judie)\nnot Sheeplike(berke)\nZoom(berke, judie)\nnot Volunteer(berke, judie)\nVolunteer(april, westleigh)\nforall x (Sheeplike(x) and not Zoom(x, westleigh) -> not Zoom(x, judie))\nforall x (Zoom(x, judie) and Volunteer(judie, april) -> Volunteer(judie, berke))\nforall x (Volunteer(x, berke) -> not Vagabond(x, berke))\nforall x (Zoom(x, berke) -> Vagabond(x, westleigh))\nforall x (Visualized(x) and Zoom(x, april) -> Zoom(april, berke))\nforall x (Vagabond(x, april) and not Zoom(x, judie) -> Zoom(april, berke))\nforall x (Zoom(x, berke) and not Vagabond(berke, april) -> not Vagabond(berke, westleigh))\nforall x (Vagabond(x, westleigh) and Zoom(x, judie) -> Zoom(westleigh, berke))\n\nZoom(april, berke)\n\nVisualized(judie) and Zoom(judie, april) and forall x (Visualized(x) and Zoom(x, april) -> Zoom(april, berke)) -> therefore Zoom(april, berke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The kizzie does not chase the randi. The kizzie is jingling. The kizzie is sinkable. The kizzie display the randi. The jeramie devein the dmitri. The jeramie devein the randi. The jeramie is jingling. The jeramie display the dmitri. The jeramie display the randi. The jeramie idolise the kizzie. The dmitri devein the kizzie. The dmitri is not sinkable. The dmitri display the kizzie. The dmitri does not visit the kizzie. The randi idolise the jeramie. If someone is sinkable and they do not see the jeramie then they do not see the kizzie. If someone display the kizzie and the kizzie idolise the randi then the kizzie idolise the dmitri. If someone idolise the dmitri then they do not chase the dmitri. If someone display the dmitri then they chase the jeramie. If someone is jingling and they see the randi then the randi display the dmitri. If someone devein the randi and they do not see the kizzie then the randi display the dmitri. If someone display the dmitri and the dmitri does not chase the randi then the dmitri does not chase the jeramie. If someone devein the jeramie and they see the kizzie then the jeramie display the dmitri. The randi does not see the dmitri.", "logic": "\nnot Devein(kizzie, randi)\nJingling(kizzie)\nSinkable(kizzie)\nDisplay(kizzie, randi)\nDevein(jeramie, dmitri)\nDevein(jeramie, randi)\nJingling(jeramie)\nDisplay(jeramie, dmitri)\nDisplay(jeramie, randi)\nIdolise(jeramie, kizzie)\nDevein(dmitri, kizzie)\nnot Sinkable(dmitri)\nDisplay(dmitri, kizzie)\nnot Idolise(dmitri, kizzie)\nIdolise(randi, jeramie)\nforall x (Sinkable(x) and not Display(x, jeramie) -> not Display(x, kizzie))\nforall x (Display(x, kizzie) and Idolise(kizzie, randi) -> Idolise(kizzie, dmitri))\nforall x (Idolise(x, dmitri) -> not Devein(x, dmitri))\nforall x (Display(x, dmitri) -> Devein(x, jeramie))\nforall x (Jingling(x) and Display(x, randi) -> Display(randi, dmitri))\nforall x (Devein(x, randi) and not Display(x, kizzie) -> Display(randi, dmitri))\nforall x (Display(x, dmitri) and not Devein(dmitri, randi) -> not Devein(dmitri, jeramie))\nforall x (Devein(x, jeramie) and Display(x, kizzie) -> Display(jeramie, dmitri))\n\nnot Display(randi, dmitri)\n\nJingling(kizzie) and Display(kizzie, randi) and forall x (Jingling(x) and Display(x, randi) -> Display(randi, dmitri)) -> therefore Display(randi, dmitri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The samaria does not chase the nikolia. The samaria is dampish. The samaria is suited. The samaria wiggle the nikolia. The kata bunker the hadley. The kata bunker the nikolia. The kata is dampish. The kata wiggle the hadley. The kata wiggle the nikolia. The kata remainder the samaria. The hadley bunker the samaria. The hadley is not suited. The hadley wiggle the samaria. The hadley does not visit the samaria. The nikolia remainder the kata. If someone is suited and they do not see the kata then they do not see the samaria. If someone wiggle the samaria and the samaria remainder the nikolia then the samaria remainder the hadley. If someone remainder the hadley then they do not chase the hadley. If someone wiggle the hadley then they chase the kata. If someone is dampish and they see the nikolia then the nikolia wiggle the hadley. If someone bunker the nikolia and they do not see the samaria then the nikolia wiggle the hadley. If someone wiggle the hadley and the hadley does not chase the nikolia then the hadley does not chase the kata. If someone bunker the kata and they see the samaria then the kata wiggle the hadley. The nikolia bunker the kata.", "logic": "\nnot Bunker(samaria, nikolia)\nDampish(samaria)\nSuited(samaria)\nWiggle(samaria, nikolia)\nBunker(kata, hadley)\nBunker(kata, nikolia)\nDampish(kata)\nWiggle(kata, hadley)\nWiggle(kata, nikolia)\nRemainder(kata, samaria)\nBunker(hadley, samaria)\nnot Suited(hadley)\nWiggle(hadley, samaria)\nnot Remainder(hadley, samaria)\nRemainder(nikolia, kata)\nforall x (Suited(x) and not Wiggle(x, kata) -> not Wiggle(x, samaria))\nforall x (Wiggle(x, samaria) and Remainder(samaria, nikolia) -> Remainder(samaria, hadley))\nforall x (Remainder(x, hadley) -> not Bunker(x, hadley))\nforall x (Wiggle(x, hadley) -> Bunker(x, kata))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Wiggle(x, nikolia) -> Wiggle(nikolia, hadley))\nforall x (Bunker(x, nikolia) and not Wiggle(x, samaria) -> Wiggle(nikolia, hadley))\nforall x (Wiggle(x, hadley) and not Bunker(hadley, nikolia) -> not Bunker(hadley, kata))\nforall x (Bunker(x, kata) and Wiggle(x, samaria) -> Wiggle(kata, hadley))\n\nBunker(nikolia, kata)\n\nDampish(samaria) and Wiggle(samaria, nikolia) and forall x (Dampish(x) and Wiggle(x, nikolia) -> Wiggle(nikolia, hadley)) -> therefore Wiggle(nikolia, hadley) Wiggle(nikolia, hadley) and forall x (Wiggle(x, hadley) -> Bunker(x, kata)) -> therefore Bunker(nikolia, kata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The neille does not chase the brynna. The neille is marginal. The neille is overpriced. The neille asterisk the brynna. The theressa whish the lester. The theressa whish the brynna. The theressa is marginal. The theressa asterisk the lester. The theressa asterisk the brynna. The theressa employ the neille. The lester whish the neille. The lester is not overpriced. The lester asterisk the neille. The lester does not visit the neille. The brynna employ the theressa. If someone is overpriced and they do not see the theressa then they do not see the neille. If someone asterisk the neille and the neille employ the brynna then the neille employ the lester. If someone employ the lester then they do not chase the lester. If someone asterisk the lester then they chase the theressa. If someone is marginal and they see the brynna then the brynna asterisk the lester. If someone whish the brynna and they do not see the neille then the brynna asterisk the lester. If someone asterisk the lester and the lester does not chase the brynna then the lester does not chase the theressa. If someone whish the theressa and they see the neille then the theressa asterisk the lester. The brynna does not chase the theressa.", "logic": "\nnot Whish(neille, brynna)\nMarginal(neille)\nOverpriced(neille)\nAsterisk(neille, brynna)\nWhish(theressa, lester)\nWhish(theressa, brynna)\nMarginal(theressa)\nAsterisk(theressa, lester)\nAsterisk(theressa, brynna)\nEmploy(theressa, neille)\nWhish(lester, neille)\nnot Overpriced(lester)\nAsterisk(lester, neille)\nnot Employ(lester, neille)\nEmploy(brynna, theressa)\nforall x (Overpriced(x) and not Asterisk(x, theressa) -> not Asterisk(x, neille))\nforall x (Asterisk(x, neille) and Employ(neille, brynna) -> Employ(neille, lester))\nforall x (Employ(x, lester) -> not Whish(x, lester))\nforall x (Asterisk(x, lester) -> Whish(x, theressa))\nforall x (Marginal(x) and Asterisk(x, brynna) -> Asterisk(brynna, lester))\nforall x (Whish(x, brynna) and not Asterisk(x, neille) -> Asterisk(brynna, lester))\nforall x (Asterisk(x, lester) and not Whish(lester, brynna) -> not Whish(lester, theressa))\nforall x (Whish(x, theressa) and Asterisk(x, neille) -> Asterisk(theressa, lester))\n\nnot Whish(brynna, theressa)\n\nMarginal(neille) and Asterisk(neille, brynna) and forall x (Marginal(x) and Asterisk(x, brynna) -> Asterisk(brynna, lester)) -> therefore Asterisk(brynna, lester) Asterisk(brynna, lester) and forall x (Asterisk(x, lester) -> Whish(x, theressa)) -> therefore Whish(brynna, theressa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The perry does not chase the brenna. The perry is repressing. The perry is slashing. The perry leash the brenna. The randi journey the laurella. The randi journey the brenna. The randi is repressing. The randi leash the laurella. The randi leash the brenna. The randi keep the perry. The laurella journey the perry. The laurella is not slashing. The laurella leash the perry. The laurella does not visit the perry. The brenna keep the randi. If someone is slashing and they do not see the randi then they do not see the perry. If someone leash the perry and the perry keep the brenna then the perry keep the laurella. If someone keep the laurella then they do not chase the laurella. If someone leash the laurella then they chase the randi. If someone is repressing and they see the brenna then the brenna leash the laurella. If someone journey the brenna and they do not see the perry then the brenna leash the laurella. If someone leash the laurella and the laurella does not chase the brenna then the laurella does not chase the randi. If someone journey the randi and they see the perry then the randi leash the laurella. The perry does not visit the laurella.", "logic": "\nnot Journey(perry, brenna)\nRepressing(perry)\nSlashing(perry)\nLeash(perry, brenna)\nJourney(randi, laurella)\nJourney(randi, brenna)\nRepressing(randi)\nLeash(randi, laurella)\nLeash(randi, brenna)\nKeep(randi, perry)\nJourney(laurella, perry)\nnot Slashing(laurella)\nLeash(laurella, perry)\nnot Keep(laurella, perry)\nKeep(brenna, randi)\nforall x (Slashing(x) and not Leash(x, randi) -> not Leash(x, perry))\nforall x (Leash(x, perry) and Keep(perry, brenna) -> Keep(perry, laurella))\nforall x (Keep(x, laurella) -> not Journey(x, laurella))\nforall x (Leash(x, laurella) -> Journey(x, randi))\nforall x (Repressing(x) and Leash(x, brenna) -> Leash(brenna, laurella))\nforall x (Journey(x, brenna) and not Leash(x, perry) -> Leash(brenna, laurella))\nforall x (Leash(x, laurella) and not Journey(laurella, brenna) -> not Journey(laurella, randi))\nforall x (Journey(x, randi) and Leash(x, perry) -> Leash(randi, laurella))\n\nnot Keep(perry, laurella)\n\nforall x (Leash(x, perry) and Keep(perry, brenna) -> Keep(perry, laurella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The webb does not chase the fidela. The webb is funicular. The webb is untellable. The webb enchant the fidela. The fulton overleap the camile. The fulton overleap the fidela. The fulton is funicular. The fulton enchant the camile. The fulton enchant the fidela. The fulton greet the webb. The camile overleap the webb. The camile is not untellable. The camile enchant the webb. The camile does not visit the webb. The fidela greet the fulton. If someone is untellable and they do not see the fulton then they do not see the webb. If someone enchant the webb and the webb greet the fidela then the webb greet the camile. If someone greet the camile then they do not chase the camile. If someone enchant the camile then they chase the fulton. If someone is funicular and they see the fidela then the fidela enchant the camile. If someone overleap the fidela and they do not see the webb then the fidela enchant the camile. If someone enchant the camile and the camile does not chase the fidela then the camile does not chase the fulton. If someone overleap the fulton and they see the webb then the fulton enchant the camile. The camile overleap the fulton.", "logic": "\nnot Overleap(webb, fidela)\nFunicular(webb)\nUntellable(webb)\nEnchant(webb, fidela)\nOverleap(fulton, camile)\nOverleap(fulton, fidela)\nFunicular(fulton)\nEnchant(fulton, camile)\nEnchant(fulton, fidela)\nGreet(fulton, webb)\nOverleap(camile, webb)\nnot Untellable(camile)\nEnchant(camile, webb)\nnot Greet(camile, webb)\nGreet(fidela, fulton)\nforall x (Untellable(x) and not Enchant(x, fulton) -> not Enchant(x, webb))\nforall x (Enchant(x, webb) and Greet(webb, fidela) -> Greet(webb, camile))\nforall x (Greet(x, camile) -> not Overleap(x, camile))\nforall x (Enchant(x, camile) -> Overleap(x, fulton))\nforall x (Funicular(x) and Enchant(x, fidela) -> Enchant(fidela, camile))\nforall x (Overleap(x, fidela) and not Enchant(x, webb) -> Enchant(fidela, camile))\nforall x (Enchant(x, camile) and not Overleap(camile, fidela) -> not Overleap(camile, fulton))\nforall x (Overleap(x, fulton) and Enchant(x, webb) -> Enchant(fulton, camile))\n\nOverleap(camile, fulton)\n\nforall x (Enchant(x, camile) -> Overleap(x, fulton)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The gert does not chase the nevins. The gert is special. The gert is orchestral. The gert brave the nevins. The mick verdigris the harri. The mick verdigris the nevins. The mick is special. The mick brave the harri. The mick brave the nevins. The mick varnish the gert. The harri verdigris the gert. The harri is not orchestral. The harri brave the gert. The harri does not visit the gert. The nevins varnish the mick. If someone is orchestral and they do not see the mick then they do not see the gert. If someone brave the gert and the gert varnish the nevins then the gert varnish the harri. If someone varnish the harri then they do not chase the harri. If someone brave the harri then they chase the mick. If someone is special and they see the nevins then the nevins brave the harri. If someone verdigris the nevins and they do not see the gert then the nevins brave the harri. If someone brave the harri and the harri does not chase the nevins then the harri does not chase the mick. If someone verdigris the mick and they see the gert then the mick brave the harri. The gert does not chase the mick.", "logic": "\nnot Verdigris(gert, nevins)\nSpecial(gert)\nOrchestral(gert)\nBrave(gert, nevins)\nVerdigris(mick, harri)\nVerdigris(mick, nevins)\nSpecial(mick)\nBrave(mick, harri)\nBrave(mick, nevins)\nVarnish(mick, gert)\nVerdigris(harri, gert)\nnot Orchestral(harri)\nBrave(harri, gert)\nnot Varnish(harri, gert)\nVarnish(nevins, mick)\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and not Brave(x, mick) -> not Brave(x, gert))\nforall x (Brave(x, gert) and Varnish(gert, nevins) -> Varnish(gert, harri))\nforall x (Varnish(x, harri) -> not Verdigris(x, harri))\nforall x (Brave(x, harri) -> Verdigris(x, mick))\nforall x (Special(x) and Brave(x, nevins) -> Brave(nevins, harri))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, nevins) and not Brave(x, gert) -> Brave(nevins, harri))\nforall x (Brave(x, harri) and not Verdigris(harri, nevins) -> not Verdigris(harri, mick))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, mick) and Brave(x, gert) -> Brave(mick, harri))\n\nnot Verdigris(gert, mick)\n\nforall x (Brave(x, harri) -> Verdigris(x, mick)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The tybi does not chase the raphael. The tybi is comburent. The tybi is lewd. The tybi sorrow the raphael. The leilah garnish the esau. The leilah garnish the raphael. The leilah is comburent. The leilah sorrow the esau. The leilah sorrow the raphael. The leilah draw the tybi. The esau garnish the tybi. The esau is not lewd. The esau sorrow the tybi. The esau does not visit the tybi. The raphael draw the leilah. If someone is lewd and they do not see the leilah then they do not see the tybi. If someone sorrow the tybi and the tybi draw the raphael then the tybi draw the esau. If someone draw the esau then they do not chase the esau. If someone sorrow the esau then they chase the leilah. If someone is comburent and they see the raphael then the raphael sorrow the esau. If someone garnish the raphael and they do not see the tybi then the raphael sorrow the esau. If someone sorrow the esau and the esau does not chase the raphael then the esau does not chase the leilah. If someone garnish the leilah and they see the tybi then the leilah sorrow the esau. The tybi sorrow the tybi.", "logic": "\nnot Garnish(tybi, raphael)\nComburent(tybi)\nLewd(tybi)\nSorrow(tybi, raphael)\nGarnish(leilah, esau)\nGarnish(leilah, raphael)\nComburent(leilah)\nSorrow(leilah, esau)\nSorrow(leilah, raphael)\nDraw(leilah, tybi)\nGarnish(esau, tybi)\nnot Lewd(esau)\nSorrow(esau, tybi)\nnot Draw(esau, tybi)\nDraw(raphael, leilah)\nforall x (Lewd(x) and not Sorrow(x, leilah) -> not Sorrow(x, tybi))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, tybi) and Draw(tybi, raphael) -> Draw(tybi, esau))\nforall x (Draw(x, esau) -> not Garnish(x, esau))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, esau) -> Garnish(x, leilah))\nforall x (Comburent(x) and Sorrow(x, raphael) -> Sorrow(raphael, esau))\nforall x (Garnish(x, raphael) and not Sorrow(x, tybi) -> Sorrow(raphael, esau))\nforall x (Sorrow(x, esau) and not Garnish(esau, raphael) -> not Garnish(esau, leilah))\nforall x (Garnish(x, leilah) and Sorrow(x, tybi) -> Sorrow(leilah, esau))\n\nSorrow(tybi, tybi)\n\nSorrow(tybi, tybi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The rozalie does not chase the ailey. The rozalie is prussian. The rozalie is momentous. The rozalie repot the ailey. The sibley contrast the abel. The sibley contrast the ailey. The sibley is prussian. The sibley repot the abel. The sibley repot the ailey. The sibley possess the rozalie. The abel contrast the rozalie. The abel is not momentous. The abel repot the rozalie. The abel does not visit the rozalie. The ailey possess the sibley. If someone is momentous and they do not see the sibley then they do not see the rozalie. If someone repot the rozalie and the rozalie possess the ailey then the rozalie possess the abel. If someone possess the abel then they do not chase the abel. If someone repot the abel then they chase the sibley. If someone is prussian and they see the ailey then the ailey repot the abel. If someone contrast the ailey and they do not see the rozalie then the ailey repot the abel. If someone repot the abel and the abel does not chase the ailey then the abel does not chase the sibley. If someone contrast the sibley and they see the rozalie then the sibley repot the abel. The ailey does not visit the abel.", "logic": "\nnot Contrast(rozalie, ailey)\nPrussian(rozalie)\nMomentous(rozalie)\nRepot(rozalie, ailey)\nContrast(sibley, abel)\nContrast(sibley, ailey)\nPrussian(sibley)\nRepot(sibley, abel)\nRepot(sibley, ailey)\nPossess(sibley, rozalie)\nContrast(abel, rozalie)\nnot Momentous(abel)\nRepot(abel, rozalie)\nnot Possess(abel, rozalie)\nPossess(ailey, sibley)\nforall x (Momentous(x) and not Repot(x, sibley) -> not Repot(x, rozalie))\nforall x (Repot(x, rozalie) and Possess(rozalie, ailey) -> Possess(rozalie, abel))\nforall x (Possess(x, abel) -> not Contrast(x, abel))\nforall x (Repot(x, abel) -> Contrast(x, sibley))\nforall x (Prussian(x) and Repot(x, ailey) -> Repot(ailey, abel))\nforall x (Contrast(x, ailey) and not Repot(x, rozalie) -> Repot(ailey, abel))\nforall x (Repot(x, abel) and not Contrast(abel, ailey) -> not Contrast(abel, sibley))\nforall x (Contrast(x, sibley) and Repot(x, rozalie) -> Repot(sibley, abel))\n\nnot Possess(ailey, abel)\n\nnot Possess(ailey, abel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "The barnaby does not chase the annissa. The barnaby is unhewn. The barnaby is mourning. The barnaby impart the annissa. The everard splash the vanna. The everard splash the annissa. The everard is unhewn. The everard impart the vanna. The everard impart the annissa. The everard sully the barnaby. The vanna splash the barnaby. The vanna is not mourning. The vanna impart the barnaby. The vanna does not visit the barnaby. The annissa sully the everard. If someone is mourning and they do not see the everard then they do not see the barnaby. If someone impart the barnaby and the barnaby sully the annissa then the barnaby sully the vanna. If someone sully the vanna then they do not chase the vanna. If someone impart the vanna then they chase the everard. If someone is unhewn and they see the annissa then the annissa impart the vanna. If someone splash the annissa and they do not see the barnaby then the annissa impart the vanna. If someone impart the vanna and the vanna does not chase the annissa then the vanna does not chase the everard. If someone splash the everard and they see the barnaby then the everard impart the vanna. The everard sully the annissa.", "logic": "\nnot Splash(barnaby, annissa)\nUnhewn(barnaby)\nMourning(barnaby)\nImpart(barnaby, annissa)\nSplash(everard, vanna)\nSplash(everard, annissa)\nUnhewn(everard)\nImpart(everard, vanna)\nImpart(everard, annissa)\nSully(everard, barnaby)\nSplash(vanna, barnaby)\nnot Mourning(vanna)\nImpart(vanna, barnaby)\nnot Sully(vanna, barnaby)\nSully(annissa, everard)\nforall x (Mourning(x) and not Impart(x, everard) -> not Impart(x, barnaby))\nforall x (Impart(x, barnaby) and Sully(barnaby, annissa) -> Sully(barnaby, vanna))\nforall x (Sully(x, vanna) -> not Splash(x, vanna))\nforall x (Impart(x, vanna) -> Splash(x, everard))\nforall x (Unhewn(x) and Impart(x, annissa) -> Impart(annissa, vanna))\nforall x (Splash(x, annissa) and not Impart(x, barnaby) -> Impart(annissa, vanna))\nforall x (Impart(x, vanna) and not Splash(vanna, annissa) -> not Splash(vanna, everard))\nforall x (Splash(x, everard) and Impart(x, barnaby) -> Impart(everard, vanna))\n\nSully(everard, annissa)\n\nSully(everard, annissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-672"} {"premises": "Veronika is tonsorial. Veronika is accursed. Veronika is stabilized. Honey is not tonsorial. Honey is spanish. Honey is stabilized. Honey is unpainful. Wyndham is accursed. Wyndham is unpainful. Marylin is unpainful. If Honey is tonsorial then Honey is not stabilized. All unpainful people are multilane. Smart, unpainful people are regimental. Green people are unpainful. If Honey is tonsorial and Honey is regimental then Honey is accursed. Cold people are accursed. Veronika is stabilized.", "logic": "\nTonsorial(veronika)\nAccursed(veronika)\nStabilized(veronika)\nnot Tonsorial(honey)\nSpanish(honey)\nStabilized(honey)\nUnpainful(honey)\nAccursed(wyndham)\nUnpainful(wyndham)\nUnpainful(marylin)\nTonsorial(honey) -> not Stabilized(honey)\nforall x (Unpainful(x) -> Multilane(x))\nforall x (Accursed(x) and Unpainful(x) -> Regimental(x))\nforall x (Tonsorial(x) -> Unpainful(x))\nTonsorial(honey) and Regimental(honey) -> Accursed(honey)\nforall x (Multilane(x) -> Accursed(x))\n\nStabilized(veronika)\n\ntherefore Stabilized(veronika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Casandra is complacent. Casandra is accessible. Casandra is lucrative. Wilow is not complacent. Wilow is traumatic. Wilow is lucrative. Wilow is lyonnaise. Meridel is accessible. Meridel is lyonnaise. Waldon is lyonnaise. If Wilow is complacent then Wilow is not lucrative. All lyonnaise people are protected. Smart, lyonnaise people are weary. Green people are lyonnaise. If Wilow is complacent and Wilow is weary then Wilow is accessible. Cold people are accessible. Casandra is not complacent.", "logic": "\nComplacent(casandra)\nAccessible(casandra)\nLucrative(casandra)\nnot Complacent(wilow)\nTraumatic(wilow)\nLucrative(wilow)\nLyonnaise(wilow)\nAccessible(meridel)\nLyonnaise(meridel)\nLyonnaise(waldon)\nComplacent(wilow) -> not Lucrative(wilow)\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) -> Protected(x))\nforall x (Accessible(x) and Lyonnaise(x) -> Weary(x))\nforall x (Complacent(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nComplacent(wilow) and Weary(wilow) -> Accessible(wilow)\nforall x (Protected(x) -> Accessible(x))\n\nnot Complacent(casandra)\n\ntherefore Complacent(casandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Dorian is extensile. Dorian is unvalued. Dorian is barometric. Aurlie is not extensile. Aurlie is tenanted. Aurlie is barometric. Aurlie is allusive. Sidonnie is unvalued. Sidonnie is allusive. Lacee is allusive. If Aurlie is extensile then Aurlie is not barometric. All allusive people are dissoluble. Smart, allusive people are funerary. Green people are allusive. If Aurlie is extensile and Aurlie is funerary then Aurlie is unvalued. Cold people are unvalued. Lacee is dissoluble.", "logic": "\nExtensile(dorian)\nUnvalued(dorian)\nBarometric(dorian)\nnot Extensile(aurlie)\nTenanted(aurlie)\nBarometric(aurlie)\nAllusive(aurlie)\nUnvalued(sidonnie)\nAllusive(sidonnie)\nAllusive(lacee)\nExtensile(aurlie) -> not Barometric(aurlie)\nforall x (Allusive(x) -> Dissoluble(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) and Allusive(x) -> Funerary(x))\nforall x (Extensile(x) -> Allusive(x))\nExtensile(aurlie) and Funerary(aurlie) -> Unvalued(aurlie)\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) -> Unvalued(x))\n\nDissoluble(lacee)\n\nAllusive(lacee) and forall x (Allusive(x) -> Dissoluble(x)) -> therefore Dissoluble(lacee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Joane is searching. Joane is dowered. Joane is unreal. Arnoldo is not searching. Arnoldo is beaked. Arnoldo is unreal. Arnoldo is owlish. Dareen is dowered. Dareen is owlish. Ross is owlish. If Arnoldo is searching then Arnoldo is not unreal. All owlish people are rentable. Smart, owlish people are totemic. Green people are owlish. If Arnoldo is searching and Arnoldo is totemic then Arnoldo is dowered. Cold people are dowered. Joane is not owlish.", "logic": "\nSearching(joane)\nDowered(joane)\nUnreal(joane)\nnot Searching(arnoldo)\nBeaked(arnoldo)\nUnreal(arnoldo)\nOwlish(arnoldo)\nDowered(dareen)\nOwlish(dareen)\nOwlish(ross)\nSearching(arnoldo) -> not Unreal(arnoldo)\nforall x (Owlish(x) -> Rentable(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) and Owlish(x) -> Totemic(x))\nforall x (Searching(x) -> Owlish(x))\nSearching(arnoldo) and Totemic(arnoldo) -> Dowered(arnoldo)\nforall x (Rentable(x) -> Dowered(x))\n\nnot Owlish(joane)\n\nSearching(joane) and forall x (Searching(x) -> Owlish(x)) -> therefore Owlish(joane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Trish is soundable. Trish is shattering. Trish is unlocked. Jessey is not soundable. Jessey is adored. Jessey is unlocked. Jessey is lifelong. Marget is shattering. Marget is lifelong. Nichols is lifelong. If Jessey is soundable then Jessey is not unlocked. All lifelong people are glamorous. Smart, lifelong people are left. Green people are lifelong. If Jessey is soundable and Jessey is left then Jessey is shattering. Cold people are shattering. Jessey is shattering.", "logic": "\nSoundable(trish)\nShattering(trish)\nUnlocked(trish)\nnot Soundable(jessey)\nAdored(jessey)\nUnlocked(jessey)\nLifelong(jessey)\nShattering(marget)\nLifelong(marget)\nLifelong(nichols)\nSoundable(jessey) -> not Unlocked(jessey)\nforall x (Lifelong(x) -> Glamorous(x))\nforall x (Shattering(x) and Lifelong(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Soundable(x) -> Lifelong(x))\nSoundable(jessey) and Left(jessey) -> Shattering(jessey)\nforall x (Glamorous(x) -> Shattering(x))\n\nShattering(jessey)\n\nLifelong(jessey) and forall x (Lifelong(x) -> Glamorous(x)) -> therefore Glamorous(jessey) Glamorous(jessey) and forall x (Glamorous(x) -> Shattering(x)) -> therefore Shattering(jessey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Georgiana is wheezing. Georgiana is cypriote. Georgiana is greyed. Pauline is not wheezing. Pauline is cherry. Pauline is greyed. Pauline is alone. Bessie is cypriote. Bessie is alone. Nannette is alone. If Pauline is wheezing then Pauline is not greyed. All alone people are absorbable. Smart, alone people are itinerant. Green people are alone. If Pauline is wheezing and Pauline is itinerant then Pauline is cypriote. Cold people are cypriote. Nannette is not cypriote.", "logic": "\nWheezing(georgiana)\nCypriote(georgiana)\nGreyed(georgiana)\nnot Wheezing(pauline)\nCherry(pauline)\nGreyed(pauline)\nAlone(pauline)\nCypriote(bessie)\nAlone(bessie)\nAlone(nannette)\nWheezing(pauline) -> not Greyed(pauline)\nforall x (Alone(x) -> Absorbable(x))\nforall x (Cypriote(x) and Alone(x) -> Itinerant(x))\nforall x (Wheezing(x) -> Alone(x))\nWheezing(pauline) and Itinerant(pauline) -> Cypriote(pauline)\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Cypriote(x))\n\nnot Cypriote(nannette)\n\nAlone(nannette) and forall x (Alone(x) -> Absorbable(x)) -> therefore Absorbable(nannette) Absorbable(nannette) and forall x (Absorbable(x) -> Cypriote(x)) -> therefore Cypriote(nannette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Maddy is alpestrine. Maddy is gainful. Maddy is rectal. Noella is not alpestrine. Noella is trojan. Noella is rectal. Noella is parasitic. Octavius is gainful. Octavius is parasitic. Rani is parasitic. If Noella is alpestrine then Noella is not rectal. All parasitic people are posthumous. Smart, parasitic people are bosomy. Green people are parasitic. If Noella is alpestrine and Noella is bosomy then Noella is gainful. Cold people are gainful. Rani is bosomy.", "logic": "\nAlpestrine(maddy)\nGainful(maddy)\nRectal(maddy)\nnot Alpestrine(noella)\nTrojan(noella)\nRectal(noella)\nParasitic(noella)\nGainful(octavius)\nParasitic(octavius)\nParasitic(rani)\nAlpestrine(noella) -> not Rectal(noella)\nforall x (Parasitic(x) -> Posthumous(x))\nforall x (Gainful(x) and Parasitic(x) -> Bosomy(x))\nforall x (Alpestrine(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nAlpestrine(noella) and Bosomy(noella) -> Gainful(noella)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Gainful(x))\n\nBosomy(rani)\n\nParasitic(rani) and forall x (Parasitic(x) -> Posthumous(x)) -> therefore Posthumous(rani) Posthumous(rani) and forall x (Posthumous(x) -> Gainful(x)) -> therefore Gainful(rani) Gainful(rani) and Parasitic(rani) and forall x (Gainful(x) and Parasitic(x) -> Bosomy(x)) -> therefore Bosomy(rani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Annora is topologic. Annora is million. Annora is vapourised. Arvin is not topologic. Arvin is pyrogenic. Arvin is vapourised. Arvin is especial. Allsun is million. Allsun is especial. Con is especial. If Arvin is topologic then Arvin is not vapourised. All especial people are cancerous. Smart, especial people are stochastic. Green people are especial. If Arvin is topologic and Arvin is stochastic then Arvin is million. Cold people are million. Con is not stochastic.", "logic": "\nTopologic(annora)\nMillion(annora)\nVapourised(annora)\nnot Topologic(arvin)\nPyrogenic(arvin)\nVapourised(arvin)\nEspecial(arvin)\nMillion(allsun)\nEspecial(allsun)\nEspecial(con)\nTopologic(arvin) -> not Vapourised(arvin)\nforall x (Especial(x) -> Cancerous(x))\nforall x (Million(x) and Especial(x) -> Stochastic(x))\nforall x (Topologic(x) -> Especial(x))\nTopologic(arvin) and Stochastic(arvin) -> Million(arvin)\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> Million(x))\n\nnot Stochastic(con)\n\nEspecial(con) and forall x (Especial(x) -> Cancerous(x)) -> therefore Cancerous(con) Cancerous(con) and forall x (Cancerous(x) -> Million(x)) -> therefore Million(con) Million(con) and Especial(con) and forall x (Million(x) and Especial(x) -> Stochastic(x)) -> therefore Stochastic(con)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Allina is overactive. Allina is parturient. Allina is busybodied. Claudelle is not overactive. Claudelle is urban. Claudelle is busybodied. Claudelle is external. Shanon is parturient. Shanon is external. Elyse is external. If Claudelle is overactive then Claudelle is not busybodied. All external people are associable. Smart, external people are atlantic. Green people are external. If Claudelle is overactive and Claudelle is atlantic then Claudelle is parturient. Cold people are parturient. Elyse is not busybodied.", "logic": "\nOveractive(allina)\nParturient(allina)\nBusybodied(allina)\nnot Overactive(claudelle)\nUrban(claudelle)\nBusybodied(claudelle)\nExternal(claudelle)\nParturient(shanon)\nExternal(shanon)\nExternal(elyse)\nOveractive(claudelle) -> not Busybodied(claudelle)\nforall x (External(x) -> Associable(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) and External(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> External(x))\nOveractive(claudelle) and Atlantic(claudelle) -> Parturient(claudelle)\nforall x (Associable(x) -> Parturient(x))\n\nnot Busybodied(elyse)\n\nnot Busybodied(elyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Jerrylee is storied. Jerrylee is westward. Jerrylee is hindmost. Flori is not storied. Flori is prisonlike. Flori is hindmost. Flori is buffeted. Martino is westward. Martino is buffeted. Garey is buffeted. If Flori is storied then Flori is not hindmost. All buffeted people are impulsive. Smart, buffeted people are hardcore. Green people are buffeted. If Flori is storied and Flori is hardcore then Flori is westward. Cold people are westward. Martino is hindmost.", "logic": "\nStoried(jerrylee)\nWestward(jerrylee)\nHindmost(jerrylee)\nnot Storied(flori)\nPrisonlike(flori)\nHindmost(flori)\nBuffeted(flori)\nWestward(martino)\nBuffeted(martino)\nBuffeted(garey)\nStoried(flori) -> not Hindmost(flori)\nforall x (Buffeted(x) -> Impulsive(x))\nforall x (Westward(x) and Buffeted(x) -> Hardcore(x))\nforall x (Storied(x) -> Buffeted(x))\nStoried(flori) and Hardcore(flori) -> Westward(flori)\nforall x (Impulsive(x) -> Westward(x))\n\nHindmost(martino)\n\nHindmost(martino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Lebbie is blameless. Lebbie is delicate. Lebbie is unfriendly. Owen is not blameless. Owen is impersonal. Owen is unfriendly. Owen is overactive. Gypsy is delicate. Gypsy is overactive. Caitlin is overactive. If Owen is blameless then Owen is not unfriendly. All overactive people are inexact. Smart, overactive people are awash. Green people are overactive. If Owen is blameless and Owen is awash then Owen is delicate. Cold people are delicate. Gypsy is not blameless.", "logic": "\nBlameless(lebbie)\nDelicate(lebbie)\nUnfriendly(lebbie)\nnot Blameless(owen)\nImpersonal(owen)\nUnfriendly(owen)\nOveractive(owen)\nDelicate(gypsy)\nOveractive(gypsy)\nOveractive(caitlin)\nBlameless(owen) -> not Unfriendly(owen)\nforall x (Overactive(x) -> Inexact(x))\nforall x (Delicate(x) and Overactive(x) -> Awash(x))\nforall x (Blameless(x) -> Overactive(x))\nBlameless(owen) and Awash(owen) -> Delicate(owen)\nforall x (Inexact(x) -> Delicate(x))\n\nnot Blameless(gypsy)\n\nnot Blameless(gypsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Inessa is smoggy. Inessa is esthetical. Inessa is overt. Faye is not smoggy. Faye is seasoned. Faye is overt. Faye is mastered. Liora is esthetical. Liora is mastered. Skippy is mastered. If Faye is smoggy then Faye is not overt. All mastered people are joyful. Smart, mastered people are astatic. Green people are mastered. If Faye is smoggy and Faye is astatic then Faye is esthetical. Cold people are esthetical. Skippy is smoggy.", "logic": "\nSmoggy(inessa)\nEsthetical(inessa)\nOvert(inessa)\nnot Smoggy(faye)\nSeasoned(faye)\nOvert(faye)\nMastered(faye)\nEsthetical(liora)\nMastered(liora)\nMastered(skippy)\nSmoggy(faye) -> not Overt(faye)\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Joyful(x))\nforall x (Esthetical(x) and Mastered(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Smoggy(x) -> Mastered(x))\nSmoggy(faye) and Astatic(faye) -> Esthetical(faye)\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Esthetical(x))\n\nSmoggy(skippy)\n\nSmoggy(skippy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Thalia is aroused. Thalia is global. Thalia is unrentable. Efram is not aroused. Efram is randomised. Efram is unrentable. Efram is sedulous. Felicle is global. Felicle is sedulous. Garnette is sedulous. If Efram is aroused then Efram is not unrentable. All sedulous people are adagio. Smart, sedulous people are daedal. Green people are sedulous. If Efram is aroused and Efram is daedal then Efram is global. Cold people are global. Garnette is not randomised.", "logic": "\nAroused(thalia)\nGlobal(thalia)\nUnrentable(thalia)\nnot Aroused(efram)\nRandomised(efram)\nUnrentable(efram)\nSedulous(efram)\nGlobal(felicle)\nSedulous(felicle)\nSedulous(garnette)\nAroused(efram) -> not Unrentable(efram)\nforall x (Sedulous(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Global(x) and Sedulous(x) -> Daedal(x))\nforall x (Aroused(x) -> Sedulous(x))\nAroused(efram) and Daedal(efram) -> Global(efram)\nforall x (Adagio(x) -> Global(x))\n\nnot Randomised(garnette)\n\nnot Randomised(garnette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "Duncan is slowgoing. Duncan is hermitical. Duncan is narrowed. Sydel is not slowgoing. Sydel is airborne. Sydel is narrowed. Sydel is unimpaired. Andee is hermitical. Andee is unimpaired. Agnola is unimpaired. If Sydel is slowgoing then Sydel is not narrowed. All unimpaired people are vowellike. Smart, unimpaired people are imbricate. Green people are unimpaired. If Sydel is slowgoing and Sydel is imbricate then Sydel is hermitical. Cold people are hermitical. Duncan is airborne.", "logic": "\nSlowgoing(duncan)\nHermitical(duncan)\nNarrowed(duncan)\nnot Slowgoing(sydel)\nAirborne(sydel)\nNarrowed(sydel)\nUnimpaired(sydel)\nHermitical(andee)\nUnimpaired(andee)\nUnimpaired(agnola)\nSlowgoing(sydel) -> not Narrowed(sydel)\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) -> Vowellike(x))\nforall x (Hermitical(x) and Unimpaired(x) -> Imbricate(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Unimpaired(x))\nSlowgoing(sydel) and Imbricate(sydel) -> Hermitical(sydel)\nforall x (Vowellike(x) -> Hermitical(x))\n\nAirborne(duncan)\n\nAirborne(duncan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1451"} {"premises": "The jamima is homophobic. The jamima is bonnie. The jamima cowhide the grier. The grier is homophobic. The grier nitrate the jamima. The beatrice is enlivened. The beatrice cowhide the grier. The desmund slacken the beatrice. The desmund is homophobic. The desmund does not like the grier. If someone nitrate the grier and the grier nitrate the beatrice then the beatrice is not vile. The grier nitrate the jamima.", "logic": "\nHomophobic(jamima)\nBonnie(jamima)\nCowhide(jamima, grier)\nHomophobic(grier)\nNitrate(grier, jamima)\nEnlivened(beatrice)\nCowhide(beatrice, grier)\nSlacken(desmund, beatrice)\nHomophobic(desmund)\nnot Nitrate(desmund, grier)\nforall x (Nitrate(x, grier) and Nitrate(grier, beatrice) -> not Vile(beatrice))\n\nNitrate(grier, jamima)\n\ntherefore Nitrate(grier, jamima)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "The denise is gentle. The denise is sinhalese. The denise contour the devonne. The devonne is gentle. The devonne burp the denise. The allah is overhanded. The allah contour the devonne. The clemente squall the allah. The clemente is gentle. The clemente does not like the devonne. If someone burp the devonne and the devonne burp the allah then the allah is not united. The denise does not need the devonne.", "logic": "\nGentle(denise)\nSinhalese(denise)\nContour(denise, devonne)\nGentle(devonne)\nBurp(devonne, denise)\nOverhanded(allah)\nContour(allah, devonne)\nSquall(clemente, allah)\nGentle(clemente)\nnot Burp(clemente, devonne)\nforall x (Burp(x, devonne) and Burp(devonne, allah) -> not United(allah))\n\nnot Contour(denise, devonne)\n\ntherefore Contour(denise, devonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "The lelia is ecdemic. The lelia is christly. The lelia imbrue the arlee. The arlee is ecdemic. The arlee egest the lelia. The germaine is laciniate. The germaine imbrue the arlee. The alexis proscribe the germaine. The alexis is ecdemic. The alexis does not like the arlee. If someone egest the arlee and the arlee egest the germaine then the germaine is not eastbound. The lelia does not need the lelia.", "logic": "\nEcdemic(lelia)\nChristly(lelia)\nImbrue(lelia, arlee)\nEcdemic(arlee)\nEgest(arlee, lelia)\nLaciniate(germaine)\nImbrue(germaine, arlee)\nProscribe(alexis, germaine)\nEcdemic(alexis)\nnot Egest(alexis, arlee)\nforall x (Egest(x, arlee) and Egest(arlee, germaine) -> not Eastbound(germaine))\n\nnot Imbrue(lelia, lelia)\n\nnot Imbrue(lelia, lelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "The lulita is hipped. The lulita is delightful. The lulita demand the amara. The amara is hipped. The amara ballot the lulita. The john is unbending. The john demand the amara. The woodie peculate the john. The woodie is hipped. The woodie does not like the amara. If someone ballot the amara and the amara ballot the john then the john is not occupied. The lulita ballot the woodie.", "logic": "\nHipped(lulita)\nDelightful(lulita)\nDemand(lulita, amara)\nHipped(amara)\nBallot(amara, lulita)\nUnbending(john)\nDemand(john, amara)\nPeculate(woodie, john)\nHipped(woodie)\nnot Ballot(woodie, amara)\nforall x (Ballot(x, amara) and Ballot(amara, john) -> not Occupied(john))\n\nBallot(lulita, woodie)\n\nBallot(lulita, woodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "The sidnee cackle the odie. The sidnee intertwine the odie. The odie intertwine the sidnee. If someone cackle the sidnee and they visit the odie then the odie cackle the sidnee. If someone cackle the sidnee and they visit the sidnee then they are sevenfold. If someone intertwine the odie and they visit the sidnee then the odie cackle the sidnee. If someone is killing then they see the odie. If someone intertwine the sidnee then they visit the odie. If someone bastardise the odie then they need the sidnee. The odie intertwine the sidnee.", "logic": "\nCackle(sidnee, odie)\nIntertwine(sidnee, odie)\nIntertwine(odie, sidnee)\nforall x (Cackle(x, sidnee) and Intertwine(x, odie) -> Cackle(odie, sidnee))\nforall x (Cackle(x, sidnee) and Intertwine(x, sidnee) -> Sevenfold(x))\nforall x (Intertwine(x, odie) and Intertwine(x, sidnee) -> Cackle(odie, sidnee))\nforall x (Killing(x) -> Bastardise(x, odie))\nforall x (Intertwine(x, sidnee) -> Intertwine(x, odie))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, odie) -> Cackle(x, sidnee))\n\nIntertwine(odie, sidnee)\n\ntherefore Intertwine(odie, sidnee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The merna cyclostyle the cyrille. The merna coggle the cyrille. The cyrille coggle the merna. If someone cyclostyle the merna and they visit the cyrille then the cyrille cyclostyle the merna. If someone cyclostyle the merna and they visit the merna then they are lymphoid. If someone coggle the cyrille and they visit the merna then the cyrille cyclostyle the merna. If someone is prostatic then they see the cyrille. If someone coggle the merna then they visit the cyrille. If someone apply the cyrille then they need the merna. The merna does not visit the cyrille.", "logic": "\nCyclostyle(merna, cyrille)\nCoggle(merna, cyrille)\nCoggle(cyrille, merna)\nforall x (Cyclostyle(x, merna) and Coggle(x, cyrille) -> Cyclostyle(cyrille, merna))\nforall x (Cyclostyle(x, merna) and Coggle(x, merna) -> Lymphoid(x))\nforall x (Coggle(x, cyrille) and Coggle(x, merna) -> Cyclostyle(cyrille, merna))\nforall x (Prostatic(x) -> Apply(x, cyrille))\nforall x (Coggle(x, merna) -> Coggle(x, cyrille))\nforall x (Apply(x, cyrille) -> Cyclostyle(x, merna))\n\nnot Coggle(merna, cyrille)\n\ntherefore Coggle(merna, cyrille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The collin spangle the camel. The collin suffice the camel. The camel suffice the collin. If someone spangle the collin and they visit the camel then the camel spangle the collin. If someone spangle the collin and they visit the collin then they are touristed. If someone suffice the camel and they visit the collin then the camel spangle the collin. If someone is dipolar then they see the camel. If someone suffice the collin then they visit the camel. If someone wish the camel then they need the collin. The camel suffice the camel.", "logic": "\nSpangle(collin, camel)\nSuffice(collin, camel)\nSuffice(camel, collin)\nforall x (Spangle(x, collin) and Suffice(x, camel) -> Spangle(camel, collin))\nforall x (Spangle(x, collin) and Suffice(x, collin) -> Touristed(x))\nforall x (Suffice(x, camel) and Suffice(x, collin) -> Spangle(camel, collin))\nforall x (Dipolar(x) -> Wish(x, camel))\nforall x (Suffice(x, collin) -> Suffice(x, camel))\nforall x (Wish(x, camel) -> Spangle(x, collin))\n\nSuffice(camel, camel)\n\nSuffice(camel, collin) and forall x (Suffice(x, collin) -> Suffice(x, camel)) -> therefore Suffice(camel, camel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The ignacius simper the dionysus. The ignacius foreordain the dionysus. The dionysus foreordain the ignacius. If someone simper the ignacius and they visit the dionysus then the dionysus simper the ignacius. If someone simper the ignacius and they visit the ignacius then they are validating. If someone foreordain the dionysus and they visit the ignacius then the dionysus simper the ignacius. If someone is subocular then they see the dionysus. If someone foreordain the ignacius then they visit the dionysus. If someone bind the dionysus then they need the ignacius. The dionysus does not visit the dionysus.", "logic": "\nSimper(ignacius, dionysus)\nForeordain(ignacius, dionysus)\nForeordain(dionysus, ignacius)\nforall x (Simper(x, ignacius) and Foreordain(x, dionysus) -> Simper(dionysus, ignacius))\nforall x (Simper(x, ignacius) and Foreordain(x, ignacius) -> Validating(x))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, dionysus) and Foreordain(x, ignacius) -> Simper(dionysus, ignacius))\nforall x (Subocular(x) -> Bind(x, dionysus))\nforall x (Foreordain(x, ignacius) -> Foreordain(x, dionysus))\nforall x (Bind(x, dionysus) -> Simper(x, ignacius))\n\nnot Foreordain(dionysus, dionysus)\n\nForeordain(dionysus, ignacius) and forall x (Foreordain(x, ignacius) -> Foreordain(x, dionysus)) -> therefore Foreordain(dionysus, dionysus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The town court the gav. The town adduce the gav. The gav adduce the town. If someone court the town and they visit the gav then the gav court the town. If someone court the town and they visit the town then they are dappled. If someone adduce the gav and they visit the town then the gav court the town. If someone is annoying then they see the gav. If someone adduce the town then they visit the gav. If someone toenail the gav then they need the town. The gav court the town.", "logic": "\nCourt(town, gav)\nAdduce(town, gav)\nAdduce(gav, town)\nforall x (Court(x, town) and Adduce(x, gav) -> Court(gav, town))\nforall x (Court(x, town) and Adduce(x, town) -> Dappled(x))\nforall x (Adduce(x, gav) and Adduce(x, town) -> Court(gav, town))\nforall x (Annoying(x) -> Toenail(x, gav))\nforall x (Adduce(x, town) -> Adduce(x, gav))\nforall x (Toenail(x, gav) -> Court(x, town))\n\nCourt(gav, town)\n\nAdduce(gav, town) and forall x (Adduce(x, town) -> Adduce(x, gav)) -> therefore Adduce(gav, gav) Adduce(gav, gav) and Adduce(gav, town) and forall x (Adduce(x, gav) and Adduce(x, town) -> Court(gav, town)) -> therefore Court(gav, town)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The tommy astrogate the timotheus. The tommy manhandle the timotheus. The timotheus manhandle the tommy. If someone astrogate the tommy and they visit the timotheus then the timotheus astrogate the tommy. If someone astrogate the tommy and they visit the tommy then they are faint. If someone manhandle the timotheus and they visit the tommy then the timotheus astrogate the tommy. If someone is amerciable then they see the timotheus. If someone manhandle the tommy then they visit the timotheus. If someone wall the timotheus then they need the tommy. The timotheus does not need the tommy.", "logic": "\nAstrogate(tommy, timotheus)\nManhandle(tommy, timotheus)\nManhandle(timotheus, tommy)\nforall x (Astrogate(x, tommy) and Manhandle(x, timotheus) -> Astrogate(timotheus, tommy))\nforall x (Astrogate(x, tommy) and Manhandle(x, tommy) -> Faint(x))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, timotheus) and Manhandle(x, tommy) -> Astrogate(timotheus, tommy))\nforall x (Amerciable(x) -> Wall(x, timotheus))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, tommy) -> Manhandle(x, timotheus))\nforall x (Wall(x, timotheus) -> Astrogate(x, tommy))\n\nnot Astrogate(timotheus, tommy)\n\nManhandle(timotheus, tommy) and forall x (Manhandle(x, tommy) -> Manhandle(x, timotheus)) -> therefore Manhandle(timotheus, timotheus) Manhandle(timotheus, timotheus) and Manhandle(timotheus, tommy) and forall x (Manhandle(x, timotheus) and Manhandle(x, tommy) -> Astrogate(timotheus, tommy)) -> therefore Astrogate(timotheus, tommy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The hendrika tribulate the estell. The hendrika serenade the estell. The estell serenade the hendrika. If someone tribulate the hendrika and they visit the estell then the estell tribulate the hendrika. If someone tribulate the hendrika and they visit the hendrika then they are caespitose. If someone serenade the estell and they visit the hendrika then the estell tribulate the hendrika. If someone is buckram then they see the estell. If someone serenade the hendrika then they visit the estell. If someone arrest the estell then they need the hendrika. The estell is caespitose.", "logic": "\nTribulate(hendrika, estell)\nSerenade(hendrika, estell)\nSerenade(estell, hendrika)\nforall x (Tribulate(x, hendrika) and Serenade(x, estell) -> Tribulate(estell, hendrika))\nforall x (Tribulate(x, hendrika) and Serenade(x, hendrika) -> Caespitose(x))\nforall x (Serenade(x, estell) and Serenade(x, hendrika) -> Tribulate(estell, hendrika))\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Arrest(x, estell))\nforall x (Serenade(x, hendrika) -> Serenade(x, estell))\nforall x (Arrest(x, estell) -> Tribulate(x, hendrika))\n\nCaespitose(estell)\n\nSerenade(estell, hendrika) and forall x (Serenade(x, hendrika) -> Serenade(x, estell)) -> therefore Serenade(estell, estell) Serenade(estell, estell) and Serenade(estell, hendrika) and forall x (Serenade(x, estell) and Serenade(x, hendrika) -> Tribulate(estell, hendrika)) -> therefore Tribulate(estell, hendrika) Tribulate(estell, hendrika) and Serenade(estell, hendrika) and forall x (Tribulate(x, hendrika) and Serenade(x, hendrika) -> Caespitose(x)) -> therefore Caespitose(estell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The gerianne craunch the finley. The gerianne lament the finley. The finley lament the gerianne. If someone craunch the gerianne and they visit the finley then the finley craunch the gerianne. If someone craunch the gerianne and they visit the gerianne then they are breakable. If someone lament the finley and they visit the gerianne then the finley craunch the gerianne. If someone is columbian then they see the finley. If someone lament the gerianne then they visit the finley. If someone salinate the finley then they need the gerianne. The finley is not breakable.", "logic": "\nCraunch(gerianne, finley)\nLament(gerianne, finley)\nLament(finley, gerianne)\nforall x (Craunch(x, gerianne) and Lament(x, finley) -> Craunch(finley, gerianne))\nforall x (Craunch(x, gerianne) and Lament(x, gerianne) -> Breakable(x))\nforall x (Lament(x, finley) and Lament(x, gerianne) -> Craunch(finley, gerianne))\nforall x (Columbian(x) -> Salinate(x, finley))\nforall x (Lament(x, gerianne) -> Lament(x, finley))\nforall x (Salinate(x, finley) -> Craunch(x, gerianne))\n\nnot Breakable(finley)\n\nLament(finley, gerianne) and forall x (Lament(x, gerianne) -> Lament(x, finley)) -> therefore Lament(finley, finley) Lament(finley, finley) and Lament(finley, gerianne) and forall x (Lament(x, finley) and Lament(x, gerianne) -> Craunch(finley, gerianne)) -> therefore Craunch(finley, gerianne) Craunch(finley, gerianne) and Lament(finley, gerianne) and forall x (Craunch(x, gerianne) and Lament(x, gerianne) -> Breakable(x)) -> therefore Breakable(finley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The ellene hurtle the coretta. The ellene darken the coretta. The coretta darken the ellene. If someone hurtle the ellene and they visit the coretta then the coretta hurtle the ellene. If someone hurtle the ellene and they visit the ellene then they are cacogenic. If someone darken the coretta and they visit the ellene then the coretta hurtle the ellene. If someone is filial then they see the coretta. If someone darken the ellene then they visit the coretta. If someone barnstorm the coretta then they need the ellene. The ellene does not need the ellene.", "logic": "\nHurtle(ellene, coretta)\nDarken(ellene, coretta)\nDarken(coretta, ellene)\nforall x (Hurtle(x, ellene) and Darken(x, coretta) -> Hurtle(coretta, ellene))\nforall x (Hurtle(x, ellene) and Darken(x, ellene) -> Cacogenic(x))\nforall x (Darken(x, coretta) and Darken(x, ellene) -> Hurtle(coretta, ellene))\nforall x (Filial(x) -> Barnstorm(x, coretta))\nforall x (Darken(x, ellene) -> Darken(x, coretta))\nforall x (Barnstorm(x, coretta) -> Hurtle(x, ellene))\n\nnot Hurtle(ellene, ellene)\n\nforall x (Barnstorm(x, coretta) -> Hurtle(x, ellene)) <- forall x (Filial(x) -> Barnstorm(x, coretta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The ahmet lionise the frayda. The ahmet anodise the frayda. The frayda anodise the ahmet. If someone lionise the ahmet and they visit the frayda then the frayda lionise the ahmet. If someone lionise the ahmet and they visit the ahmet then they are levantine. If someone anodise the frayda and they visit the ahmet then the frayda lionise the ahmet. If someone is umpteenth then they see the frayda. If someone anodise the ahmet then they visit the frayda. If someone crest the frayda then they need the ahmet. The frayda crest the frayda.", "logic": "\nLionise(ahmet, frayda)\nAnodise(ahmet, frayda)\nAnodise(frayda, ahmet)\nforall x (Lionise(x, ahmet) and Anodise(x, frayda) -> Lionise(frayda, ahmet))\nforall x (Lionise(x, ahmet) and Anodise(x, ahmet) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Anodise(x, frayda) and Anodise(x, ahmet) -> Lionise(frayda, ahmet))\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) -> Crest(x, frayda))\nforall x (Anodise(x, ahmet) -> Anodise(x, frayda))\nforall x (Crest(x, frayda) -> Lionise(x, ahmet))\n\nCrest(frayda, frayda)\n\nforall x (Umpteenth(x) -> Crest(x, frayda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The jillie hare the sharla. The jillie slop the sharla. The sharla slop the jillie. If someone hare the jillie and they visit the sharla then the sharla hare the jillie. If someone hare the jillie and they visit the jillie then they are afloat. If someone slop the sharla and they visit the jillie then the sharla hare the jillie. If someone is enteric then they see the sharla. If someone slop the jillie then they visit the sharla. If someone bedaub the sharla then they need the jillie. The jillie is not afloat.", "logic": "\nHare(jillie, sharla)\nSlop(jillie, sharla)\nSlop(sharla, jillie)\nforall x (Hare(x, jillie) and Slop(x, sharla) -> Hare(sharla, jillie))\nforall x (Hare(x, jillie) and Slop(x, jillie) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Slop(x, sharla) and Slop(x, jillie) -> Hare(sharla, jillie))\nforall x (Enteric(x) -> Bedaub(x, sharla))\nforall x (Slop(x, jillie) -> Slop(x, sharla))\nforall x (Bedaub(x, sharla) -> Hare(x, jillie))\n\nnot Afloat(jillie)\n\nforall x (Hare(x, jillie) and Slop(x, jillie) -> Afloat(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The doralynn model the husain. The doralynn triplicate the husain. The husain triplicate the doralynn. If someone model the doralynn and they visit the husain then the husain model the doralynn. If someone model the doralynn and they visit the doralynn then they are glazed. If someone triplicate the husain and they visit the doralynn then the husain model the doralynn. If someone is xlvii then they see the husain. If someone triplicate the doralynn then they visit the husain. If someone steepen the husain then they need the doralynn. The doralynn steepen the husain.", "logic": "\nModel(doralynn, husain)\nTriplicate(doralynn, husain)\nTriplicate(husain, doralynn)\nforall x (Model(x, doralynn) and Triplicate(x, husain) -> Model(husain, doralynn))\nforall x (Model(x, doralynn) and Triplicate(x, doralynn) -> Glazed(x))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, husain) and Triplicate(x, doralynn) -> Model(husain, doralynn))\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Steepen(x, husain))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, doralynn) -> Triplicate(x, husain))\nforall x (Steepen(x, husain) -> Model(x, doralynn))\n\nSteepen(doralynn, husain)\n\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Steepen(x, husain)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The helyn stoke the fraser. The helyn hesitate the fraser. The fraser hesitate the helyn. If someone stoke the helyn and they visit the fraser then the fraser stoke the helyn. If someone stoke the helyn and they visit the helyn then they are resolute. If someone hesitate the fraser and they visit the helyn then the fraser stoke the helyn. If someone is niggling then they see the fraser. If someone hesitate the helyn then they visit the fraser. If someone evert the fraser then they need the helyn. The fraser does not need the fraser.", "logic": "\nStoke(helyn, fraser)\nHesitate(helyn, fraser)\nHesitate(fraser, helyn)\nforall x (Stoke(x, helyn) and Hesitate(x, fraser) -> Stoke(fraser, helyn))\nforall x (Stoke(x, helyn) and Hesitate(x, helyn) -> Resolute(x))\nforall x (Hesitate(x, fraser) and Hesitate(x, helyn) -> Stoke(fraser, helyn))\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Evert(x, fraser))\nforall x (Hesitate(x, helyn) -> Hesitate(x, fraser))\nforall x (Evert(x, fraser) -> Stoke(x, helyn))\n\nnot Stoke(fraser, fraser)\n\nnot Stoke(fraser, fraser) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The faun apologize the darbie. The faun jeer the darbie. The darbie jeer the faun. If someone apologize the faun and they visit the darbie then the darbie apologize the faun. If someone apologize the faun and they visit the faun then they are auric. If someone jeer the darbie and they visit the faun then the darbie apologize the faun. If someone is prodromic then they see the darbie. If someone jeer the faun then they visit the darbie. If someone egotrip the darbie then they need the faun. The faun is kind.", "logic": "\nApologize(faun, darbie)\nJeer(faun, darbie)\nJeer(darbie, faun)\nforall x (Apologize(x, faun) and Jeer(x, darbie) -> Apologize(darbie, faun))\nforall x (Apologize(x, faun) and Jeer(x, faun) -> Auric(x))\nforall x (Jeer(x, darbie) and Jeer(x, faun) -> Apologize(darbie, faun))\nforall x (Prodromic(x) -> Egotrip(x, darbie))\nforall x (Jeer(x, faun) -> Jeer(x, darbie))\nforall x (Egotrip(x, darbie) -> Apologize(x, faun))\n\nKind(faun)\n\nKind(faun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The leonardo anathemize the mickey. The leonardo symmetrise the mickey. The mickey symmetrise the leonardo. If someone anathemize the leonardo and they visit the mickey then the mickey anathemize the leonardo. If someone anathemize the leonardo and they visit the leonardo then they are uncooked. If someone symmetrise the mickey and they visit the leonardo then the mickey anathemize the leonardo. If someone is andean then they see the mickey. If someone symmetrise the leonardo then they visit the mickey. If someone programme the mickey then they need the leonardo. The mickey does not see the leonardo.", "logic": "\nAnathemize(leonardo, mickey)\nSymmetrise(leonardo, mickey)\nSymmetrise(mickey, leonardo)\nforall x (Anathemize(x, leonardo) and Symmetrise(x, mickey) -> Anathemize(mickey, leonardo))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, leonardo) and Symmetrise(x, leonardo) -> Uncooked(x))\nforall x (Symmetrise(x, mickey) and Symmetrise(x, leonardo) -> Anathemize(mickey, leonardo))\nforall x (Andean(x) -> Programme(x, mickey))\nforall x (Symmetrise(x, leonardo) -> Symmetrise(x, mickey))\nforall x (Programme(x, mickey) -> Anathemize(x, leonardo))\n\nnot Programme(mickey, leonardo)\n\nnot Programme(mickey, leonardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The winslow usher the tyrus. The winslow cast the tyrus. The tyrus cast the winslow. If someone usher the winslow and they visit the tyrus then the tyrus usher the winslow. If someone usher the winslow and they visit the winslow then they are wondrous. If someone cast the tyrus and they visit the winslow then the tyrus usher the winslow. If someone is vestmented then they see the tyrus. If someone cast the winslow then they visit the tyrus. If someone donate the tyrus then they need the winslow. The winslow is green.", "logic": "\nUsher(winslow, tyrus)\nCast(winslow, tyrus)\nCast(tyrus, winslow)\nforall x (Usher(x, winslow) and Cast(x, tyrus) -> Usher(tyrus, winslow))\nforall x (Usher(x, winslow) and Cast(x, winslow) -> Wondrous(x))\nforall x (Cast(x, tyrus) and Cast(x, winslow) -> Usher(tyrus, winslow))\nforall x (Vestmented(x) -> Donate(x, tyrus))\nforall x (Cast(x, winslow) -> Cast(x, tyrus))\nforall x (Donate(x, tyrus) -> Usher(x, winslow))\n\nGreen(winslow)\n\nGreen(winslow) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1386"} {"premises": "The andriana is utopian. All utopian things are togolese. Cold things are photic. Rough things are baptistic. All baptistic things are utopian. If the andriana is togolese then the andriana is photic. All photic things are drowsy. All baptistic, drowsy things are utopian. All togolese things are utopian. The andriana is utopian.", "logic": "\nUtopian(andriana)\nforall x (Utopian(x) -> Togolese(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) -> Photic(x))\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Baptistic(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) -> Utopian(x))\nTogolese(andriana) -> Photic(andriana)\nforall x (Photic(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Drowsy(x) -> Utopian(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> Utopian(x))\n\nUtopian(andriana)\n\ntherefore Utopian(andriana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The karleen is cogitative. All cogitative things are intoned. Cold things are harried. Rough things are twopenny. All twopenny things are cogitative. If the karleen is intoned then the karleen is harried. All harried things are puckish. All twopenny, puckish things are cogitative. All intoned things are cogitative. The karleen is not cogitative.", "logic": "\nCogitative(karleen)\nforall x (Cogitative(x) -> Intoned(x))\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Harried(x))\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Twopenny(x))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> Cogitative(x))\nIntoned(karleen) -> Harried(karleen)\nforall x (Harried(x) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) and Puckish(x) -> Cogitative(x))\nforall x (Intoned(x) -> Cogitative(x))\n\nnot Cogitative(karleen)\n\ntherefore Cogitative(karleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The ravil is unable. All unable things are meiotic. Cold things are uniovulate. Rough things are checkered. All checkered things are unable. If the ravil is meiotic then the ravil is uniovulate. All uniovulate things are imploring. All checkered, imploring things are unable. All meiotic things are unable. The ravil is meiotic.", "logic": "\nUnable(ravil)\nforall x (Unable(x) -> Meiotic(x))\nforall x (Imploring(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> Checkered(x))\nforall x (Checkered(x) -> Unable(x))\nMeiotic(ravil) -> Uniovulate(ravil)\nforall x (Uniovulate(x) -> Imploring(x))\nforall x (Checkered(x) and Imploring(x) -> Unable(x))\nforall x (Meiotic(x) -> Unable(x))\n\nMeiotic(ravil)\n\nUnable(ravil) and forall x (Unable(x) -> Meiotic(x)) -> therefore Meiotic(ravil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The herb is objective. All objective things are prakritic. Cold things are dependable. Rough things are breathless. All breathless things are objective. If the herb is prakritic then the herb is dependable. All dependable things are earthlike. All breathless, earthlike things are objective. All prakritic things are objective. The herb is not prakritic.", "logic": "\nObjective(herb)\nforall x (Objective(x) -> Prakritic(x))\nforall x (Earthlike(x) -> Dependable(x))\nforall x (Dependable(x) -> Breathless(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) -> Objective(x))\nPrakritic(herb) -> Dependable(herb)\nforall x (Dependable(x) -> Earthlike(x))\nforall x (Breathless(x) and Earthlike(x) -> Objective(x))\nforall x (Prakritic(x) -> Objective(x))\n\nnot Prakritic(herb)\n\nObjective(herb) and forall x (Objective(x) -> Prakritic(x)) -> therefore Prakritic(herb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The yetty is coruscant. All coruscant things are unbiassed. Cold things are acidotic. Rough things are spare. All spare things are coruscant. If the yetty is unbiassed then the yetty is acidotic. All acidotic things are bigeneric. All spare, bigeneric things are coruscant. All unbiassed things are coruscant. The yetty is acidotic.", "logic": "\nCoruscant(yetty)\nforall x (Coruscant(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Acidotic(x))\nforall x (Acidotic(x) -> Spare(x))\nforall x (Spare(x) -> Coruscant(x))\nUnbiassed(yetty) -> Acidotic(yetty)\nforall x (Acidotic(x) -> Bigeneric(x))\nforall x (Spare(x) and Bigeneric(x) -> Coruscant(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Coruscant(x))\n\nAcidotic(yetty)\n\nCoruscant(yetty) and forall x (Coruscant(x) -> Unbiassed(x)) -> therefore Unbiassed(yetty) Unbiassed(yetty) and Unbiassed(yetty) -> Acidotic(yetty) -> therefore Acidotic(yetty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The hewet is desiccate. All desiccate things are redbrick. Cold things are four. Rough things are throaty. All throaty things are desiccate. If the hewet is redbrick then the hewet is four. All four things are brinded. All throaty, brinded things are desiccate. All redbrick things are desiccate. The hewet is not four.", "logic": "\nDesiccate(hewet)\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) -> Four(x))\nforall x (Four(x) -> Throaty(x))\nforall x (Throaty(x) -> Desiccate(x))\nRedbrick(hewet) -> Four(hewet)\nforall x (Four(x) -> Brinded(x))\nforall x (Throaty(x) and Brinded(x) -> Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) -> Desiccate(x))\n\nnot Four(hewet)\n\nDesiccate(hewet) and forall x (Desiccate(x) -> Redbrick(x)) -> therefore Redbrick(hewet) Redbrick(hewet) and Redbrick(hewet) -> Four(hewet) -> therefore Four(hewet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The maurine is menopausal. All menopausal things are noseless. Cold things are blocked. Rough things are gumptious. All gumptious things are menopausal. If the maurine is noseless then the maurine is blocked. All blocked things are lamented. All gumptious, lamented things are menopausal. All noseless things are menopausal. The maurine is lamented.", "logic": "\nMenopausal(maurine)\nforall x (Menopausal(x) -> Noseless(x))\nforall x (Lamented(x) -> Blocked(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Gumptious(x))\nforall x (Gumptious(x) -> Menopausal(x))\nNoseless(maurine) -> Blocked(maurine)\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Lamented(x))\nforall x (Gumptious(x) and Lamented(x) -> Menopausal(x))\nforall x (Noseless(x) -> Menopausal(x))\n\nLamented(maurine)\n\nMenopausal(maurine) and forall x (Menopausal(x) -> Noseless(x)) -> therefore Noseless(maurine) Noseless(maurine) and Noseless(maurine) -> Blocked(maurine) -> therefore Blocked(maurine) Blocked(maurine) and forall x (Blocked(x) -> Lamented(x)) -> therefore Lamented(maurine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The izaak is inordinate. All inordinate things are advertent. Cold things are canonized. Rough things are tinny. All tinny things are inordinate. If the izaak is advertent then the izaak is canonized. All canonized things are subfusc. All tinny, subfusc things are inordinate. All advertent things are inordinate. The izaak is not subfusc.", "logic": "\nInordinate(izaak)\nforall x (Inordinate(x) -> Advertent(x))\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Canonized(x))\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Tinny(x))\nforall x (Tinny(x) -> Inordinate(x))\nAdvertent(izaak) -> Canonized(izaak)\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Subfusc(x))\nforall x (Tinny(x) and Subfusc(x) -> Inordinate(x))\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> Inordinate(x))\n\nnot Subfusc(izaak)\n\nInordinate(izaak) and forall x (Inordinate(x) -> Advertent(x)) -> therefore Advertent(izaak) Advertent(izaak) and Advertent(izaak) -> Canonized(izaak) -> therefore Canonized(izaak) Canonized(izaak) and forall x (Canonized(x) -> Subfusc(x)) -> therefore Subfusc(izaak)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The nixie is eremitic. All eremitic things are forgetful. Cold things are antiquated. Rough things are perirhinal. All perirhinal things are eremitic. If the nixie is forgetful then the nixie is antiquated. All antiquated things are finespun. All perirhinal, finespun things are eremitic. All forgetful things are eremitic. The nixie does not see the nixie.", "logic": "\nEremitic(nixie)\nforall x (Eremitic(x) -> Forgetful(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) -> Antiquated(x))\nforall x (Antiquated(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) -> Eremitic(x))\nForgetful(nixie) -> Antiquated(nixie)\nforall x (Antiquated(x) -> Finespun(x))\nforall x (Perirhinal(x) and Finespun(x) -> Eremitic(x))\nforall x (Forgetful(x) -> Eremitic(x))\n\nnot Sees(nixie, nixie)\n\nnot Sees(nixie, nixie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The zondra is trashy. All trashy things are protean. Cold things are suspected. Rough things are crass. All crass things are trashy. If the zondra is protean then the zondra is suspected. All suspected things are glib. All crass, glib things are trashy. All protean things are trashy. The zondra needs the zondra.", "logic": "\nTrashy(zondra)\nforall x (Trashy(x) -> Protean(x))\nforall x (Glib(x) -> Suspected(x))\nforall x (Suspected(x) -> Crass(x))\nforall x (Crass(x) -> Trashy(x))\nProtean(zondra) -> Suspected(zondra)\nforall x (Suspected(x) -> Glib(x))\nforall x (Crass(x) and Glib(x) -> Trashy(x))\nforall x (Protean(x) -> Trashy(x))\n\nNeeds(zondra, zondra)\n\nNeeds(zondra, zondra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1212"} {"premises": "The chloette is pilose. The davey jackknife the chloette. If something jackknife the chloette then it illuminate the chloette. If something illuminate the davey then it is abatable. If something illuminate the chloette and it is pilose then the chloette is abatable. If something guzzle the davey then it guzzle the chloette. If something is abatable and it jackknife the chloette then it illuminate the davey. If something is resinlike and it guzzle the chloette then it jackknife the davey. If something illuminate the davey and it is misguided then it guzzle the davey. If the chloette illuminate the davey then the davey guzzle the chloette. The davey jackknife the chloette.", "logic": "\nPilose(chloette)\nJackknife(davey, chloette)\nforall x (Jackknife(x, chloette) -> Illuminate(x, chloette))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, davey) -> Abatable(x))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, chloette) and Pilose(x) -> Abatable(chloette))\nforall x (Guzzle(x, davey) -> Guzzle(x, chloette))\nforall x (Abatable(x) and Jackknife(x, chloette) -> Illuminate(x, davey))\nforall x (Resinlike(x) and Guzzle(x, chloette) -> Jackknife(x, davey))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, davey) and Misguided(x) -> Guzzle(x, davey))\nIlluminate(chloette, davey) -> Guzzle(davey, chloette)\n\nJackknife(davey, chloette)\n\ntherefore Jackknife(davey, chloette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5381"} {"premises": "The lucille is goalless. The stephan entrench the lucille. If something entrench the lucille then it offend the lucille. If something offend the stephan then it is harried. If something offend the lucille and it is goalless then the lucille is harried. If something arraign the stephan then it arraign the lucille. If something is harried and it entrench the lucille then it offend the stephan. If something is measured and it arraign the lucille then it entrench the stephan. If something offend the stephan and it is veiled then it arraign the stephan. If the lucille offend the stephan then the stephan arraign the lucille. The lucille is not goalless.", "logic": "\nGoalless(lucille)\nEntrench(stephan, lucille)\nforall x (Entrench(x, lucille) -> Offend(x, lucille))\nforall x (Offend(x, stephan) -> Harried(x))\nforall x (Offend(x, lucille) and Goalless(x) -> Harried(lucille))\nforall x (Arraign(x, stephan) -> Arraign(x, lucille))\nforall x (Harried(x) and Entrench(x, lucille) -> Offend(x, stephan))\nforall x (Measured(x) and Arraign(x, lucille) -> Entrench(x, stephan))\nforall x (Offend(x, stephan) and Veiled(x) -> Arraign(x, stephan))\nOffend(lucille, stephan) -> Arraign(stephan, lucille)\n\nnot Goalless(lucille)\n\ntherefore Goalless(lucille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5381"} {"premises": "The issie is spondaic. The nerita unman the issie. If something unman the issie then it replenish the issie. If something replenish the nerita then it is calamitous. If something replenish the issie and it is spondaic then the issie is calamitous. If something rival the nerita then it rival the issie. If something is calamitous and it unman the issie then it replenish the nerita. If something is omnipotent and it rival the issie then it unman the nerita. If something replenish the nerita and it is aldehydic then it rival the nerita. If the issie replenish the nerita then the nerita rival the issie. The nerita does not need the nerita.", "logic": "\nSpondaic(issie)\nUnman(nerita, issie)\nforall x (Unman(x, issie) -> Replenish(x, issie))\nforall x (Replenish(x, nerita) -> Calamitous(x))\nforall x (Replenish(x, issie) and Spondaic(x) -> Calamitous(issie))\nforall x (Rival(x, nerita) -> Rival(x, issie))\nforall x (Calamitous(x) and Unman(x, issie) -> Replenish(x, nerita))\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) and Rival(x, issie) -> Unman(x, nerita))\nforall x (Replenish(x, nerita) and Aldehydic(x) -> Rival(x, nerita))\nReplenish(issie, nerita) -> Rival(nerita, issie)\n\nnot Unman(nerita, nerita)\n\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) and Rival(x, issie) -> Unman(x, nerita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5381"} {"premises": "The eran is casebook. The conny oxygenate the eran. If something oxygenate the eran then it crust the eran. If something crust the conny then it is authorized. If something crust the eran and it is casebook then the eran is authorized. If something mistreat the conny then it mistreat the eran. If something is authorized and it oxygenate the eran then it crust the conny. If something is diabetic and it mistreat the eran then it oxygenate the conny. If something crust the conny and it is lonesome then it mistreat the conny. If the eran crust the conny then the conny mistreat the eran. The eran is lonesome.", "logic": "\nCasebook(eran)\nOxygenate(conny, eran)\nforall x (Oxygenate(x, eran) -> Crust(x, eran))\nforall x (Crust(x, conny) -> Authorized(x))\nforall x (Crust(x, eran) and Casebook(x) -> Authorized(eran))\nforall x (Mistreat(x, conny) -> Mistreat(x, eran))\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Oxygenate(x, eran) -> Crust(x, conny))\nforall x (Diabetic(x) and Mistreat(x, eran) -> Oxygenate(x, conny))\nforall x (Crust(x, conny) and Lonesome(x) -> Mistreat(x, conny))\nCrust(eran, conny) -> Mistreat(conny, eran)\n\nLonesome(eran)\n\nLonesome(eran) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5381"} {"premises": "The samara is frictional. The samara does not see the nanon. The nanon sulk the samara. If something sulk the samara and the samara is ageing then it overgorge the nanon. If something is frictional then it overgorge the nanon. If the nanon is makeshift and the nanon overgorge the samara then the nanon verbalize the samara. If the nanon overgorge the samara then the nanon is not severable. If something verbalize the samara and it overgorge the nanon then the samara is aphanitic. If something overgorge the nanon then it overgorge the samara. If something overgorge the samara then it is ageing. If something verbalize the samara and the samara overgorge the nanon then it does not need the samara. The samara does not see the nanon.", "logic": "\nFrictional(samara)\nnot Verbalize(samara, nanon)\nSulk(nanon, samara)\nforall x (Sulk(x, samara) and Ageing(samara) -> Overgorge(x, nanon))\nforall x (Frictional(x) -> Overgorge(x, nanon))\nMakeshift(nanon) and Overgorge(nanon, samara) -> Verbalize(nanon, samara)\nOvergorge(nanon, samara) -> not Severable(nanon)\nforall x (Verbalize(x, samara) and Overgorge(x, nanon) -> Aphanitic(samara))\nforall x (Overgorge(x, nanon) -> Overgorge(x, samara))\nforall x (Overgorge(x, samara) -> Ageing(x))\nforall x (Verbalize(x, samara) and Overgorge(samara, nanon) -> not Sulk(x, samara))\n\nnot Verbalize(samara, nanon)\n\ntherefore not Verbalize(samara, nanon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The lew is heedless. The lew does not see the rosanne. The rosanne bedazzle the lew. If something bedazzle the lew and the lew is cuticular then it leaven the rosanne. If something is heedless then it leaven the rosanne. If the rosanne is fungible and the rosanne leaven the lew then the rosanne copyright the lew. If the rosanne leaven the lew then the rosanne is not confirmed. If something copyright the lew and it leaven the rosanne then the lew is torrid. If something leaven the rosanne then it leaven the lew. If something leaven the lew then it is cuticular. If something copyright the lew and the lew leaven the rosanne then it does not need the lew. The lew is not heedless.", "logic": "\nHeedless(lew)\nnot Copyright(lew, rosanne)\nBedazzle(rosanne, lew)\nforall x (Bedazzle(x, lew) and Cuticular(lew) -> Leaven(x, rosanne))\nforall x (Heedless(x) -> Leaven(x, rosanne))\nFungible(rosanne) and Leaven(rosanne, lew) -> Copyright(rosanne, lew)\nLeaven(rosanne, lew) -> not Confirmed(rosanne)\nforall x (Copyright(x, lew) and Leaven(x, rosanne) -> Torrid(lew))\nforall x (Leaven(x, rosanne) -> Leaven(x, lew))\nforall x (Leaven(x, lew) -> Cuticular(x))\nforall x (Copyright(x, lew) and Leaven(lew, rosanne) -> not Bedazzle(x, lew))\n\nnot Heedless(lew)\n\ntherefore Heedless(lew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The parke is evacuant. The parke does not see the teodoor. The teodoor yacht the parke. If something yacht the parke and the parke is misplaced then it moult the teodoor. If something is evacuant then it moult the teodoor. If the teodoor is iambic and the teodoor moult the parke then the teodoor strum the parke. If the teodoor moult the parke then the teodoor is not encouraged. If something strum the parke and it moult the teodoor then the parke is amber. If something moult the teodoor then it moult the parke. If something moult the parke then it is misplaced. If something strum the parke and the parke moult the teodoor then it does not need the parke. The parke moult the teodoor.", "logic": "\nEvacuant(parke)\nnot Strum(parke, teodoor)\nYacht(teodoor, parke)\nforall x (Yacht(x, parke) and Misplaced(parke) -> Moult(x, teodoor))\nforall x (Evacuant(x) -> Moult(x, teodoor))\nIambic(teodoor) and Moult(teodoor, parke) -> Strum(teodoor, parke)\nMoult(teodoor, parke) -> not Encouraged(teodoor)\nforall x (Strum(x, parke) and Moult(x, teodoor) -> Amber(parke))\nforall x (Moult(x, teodoor) -> Moult(x, parke))\nforall x (Moult(x, parke) -> Misplaced(x))\nforall x (Strum(x, parke) and Moult(parke, teodoor) -> not Yacht(x, parke))\n\nMoult(parke, teodoor)\n\nEvacuant(parke) and forall x (Evacuant(x) -> Moult(x, teodoor)) -> therefore Moult(parke, teodoor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The quentin is briefless. The quentin does not see the vally. The vally preen the quentin. If something preen the quentin and the quentin is etiolate then it butterfly the vally. If something is briefless then it butterfly the vally. If the vally is grassless and the vally butterfly the quentin then the vally grill the quentin. If the vally butterfly the quentin then the vally is not gainful. If something grill the quentin and it butterfly the vally then the quentin is buff. If something butterfly the vally then it butterfly the quentin. If something butterfly the quentin then it is etiolate. If something grill the quentin and the quentin butterfly the vally then it does not need the quentin. The quentin does not chase the vally.", "logic": "\nBriefless(quentin)\nnot Grill(quentin, vally)\nPreen(vally, quentin)\nforall x (Preen(x, quentin) and Etiolate(quentin) -> Butterfly(x, vally))\nforall x (Briefless(x) -> Butterfly(x, vally))\nGrassless(vally) and Butterfly(vally, quentin) -> Grill(vally, quentin)\nButterfly(vally, quentin) -> not Gainful(vally)\nforall x (Grill(x, quentin) and Butterfly(x, vally) -> Buff(quentin))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, vally) -> Butterfly(x, quentin))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, quentin) -> Etiolate(x))\nforall x (Grill(x, quentin) and Butterfly(quentin, vally) -> not Preen(x, quentin))\n\nnot Butterfly(quentin, vally)\n\nBriefless(quentin) and forall x (Briefless(x) -> Butterfly(x, vally)) -> therefore Butterfly(quentin, vally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The guillaume is floral. The guillaume does not see the terrence. The terrence polemize the guillaume. If something polemize the guillaume and the guillaume is comburant then it rename the terrence. If something is floral then it rename the terrence. If the terrence is indwelling and the terrence rename the guillaume then the terrence guffaw the guillaume. If the terrence rename the guillaume then the terrence is not deniable. If something guffaw the guillaume and it rename the terrence then the guillaume is potbound. If something rename the terrence then it rename the guillaume. If something rename the guillaume then it is comburant. If something guffaw the guillaume and the guillaume rename the terrence then it does not need the guillaume. The guillaume rename the guillaume.", "logic": "\nFloral(guillaume)\nnot Guffaw(guillaume, terrence)\nPolemize(terrence, guillaume)\nforall x (Polemize(x, guillaume) and Comburant(guillaume) -> Rename(x, terrence))\nforall x (Floral(x) -> Rename(x, terrence))\nIndwelling(terrence) and Rename(terrence, guillaume) -> Guffaw(terrence, guillaume)\nRename(terrence, guillaume) -> not Deniable(terrence)\nforall x (Guffaw(x, guillaume) and Rename(x, terrence) -> Potbound(guillaume))\nforall x (Rename(x, terrence) -> Rename(x, guillaume))\nforall x (Rename(x, guillaume) -> Comburant(x))\nforall x (Guffaw(x, guillaume) and Rename(guillaume, terrence) -> not Polemize(x, guillaume))\n\nRename(guillaume, guillaume)\n\nFloral(guillaume) and forall x (Floral(x) -> Rename(x, terrence)) -> therefore Rename(guillaume, terrence) Rename(guillaume, terrence) and forall x (Rename(x, terrence) -> Rename(x, guillaume)) -> therefore Rename(guillaume, guillaume)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The bathsheba is drab. The bathsheba does not see the jocelin. The jocelin outshine the bathsheba. If something outshine the bathsheba and the bathsheba is wayfaring then it squeeze the jocelin. If something is drab then it squeeze the jocelin. If the jocelin is quarterly and the jocelin squeeze the bathsheba then the jocelin waddle the bathsheba. If the jocelin squeeze the bathsheba then the jocelin is not humorless. If something waddle the bathsheba and it squeeze the jocelin then the bathsheba is basiscopic. If something squeeze the jocelin then it squeeze the bathsheba. If something squeeze the bathsheba then it is wayfaring. If something waddle the bathsheba and the bathsheba squeeze the jocelin then it does not need the bathsheba. The bathsheba does not chase the bathsheba.", "logic": "\nDrab(bathsheba)\nnot Waddle(bathsheba, jocelin)\nOutshine(jocelin, bathsheba)\nforall x (Outshine(x, bathsheba) and Wayfaring(bathsheba) -> Squeeze(x, jocelin))\nforall x (Drab(x) -> Squeeze(x, jocelin))\nQuarterly(jocelin) and Squeeze(jocelin, bathsheba) -> Waddle(jocelin, bathsheba)\nSqueeze(jocelin, bathsheba) -> not Humorless(jocelin)\nforall x (Waddle(x, bathsheba) and Squeeze(x, jocelin) -> Basiscopic(bathsheba))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, jocelin) -> Squeeze(x, bathsheba))\nforall x (Squeeze(x, bathsheba) -> Wayfaring(x))\nforall x (Waddle(x, bathsheba) and Squeeze(bathsheba, jocelin) -> not Outshine(x, bathsheba))\n\nnot Squeeze(bathsheba, bathsheba)\n\nDrab(bathsheba) and forall x (Drab(x) -> Squeeze(x, jocelin)) -> therefore Squeeze(bathsheba, jocelin) Squeeze(bathsheba, jocelin) and forall x (Squeeze(x, jocelin) -> Squeeze(x, bathsheba)) -> therefore Squeeze(bathsheba, bathsheba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The madelin is nonpublic. The madelin does not see the elsbeth. The elsbeth embalm the madelin. If something embalm the madelin and the madelin is gibelike then it dissociate the elsbeth. If something is nonpublic then it dissociate the elsbeth. If the elsbeth is renewed and the elsbeth dissociate the madelin then the elsbeth tire the madelin. If the elsbeth dissociate the madelin then the elsbeth is not unusual. If something tire the madelin and it dissociate the elsbeth then the madelin is pellucid. If something dissociate the elsbeth then it dissociate the madelin. If something dissociate the madelin then it is gibelike. If something tire the madelin and the madelin dissociate the elsbeth then it does not need the madelin. The madelin is gibelike.", "logic": "\nNonpublic(madelin)\nnot Tire(madelin, elsbeth)\nEmbalm(elsbeth, madelin)\nforall x (Embalm(x, madelin) and Gibelike(madelin) -> Dissociate(x, elsbeth))\nforall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Dissociate(x, elsbeth))\nRenewed(elsbeth) and Dissociate(elsbeth, madelin) -> Tire(elsbeth, madelin)\nDissociate(elsbeth, madelin) -> not Unusual(elsbeth)\nforall x (Tire(x, madelin) and Dissociate(x, elsbeth) -> Pellucid(madelin))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, elsbeth) -> Dissociate(x, madelin))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, madelin) -> Gibelike(x))\nforall x (Tire(x, madelin) and Dissociate(madelin, elsbeth) -> not Embalm(x, madelin))\n\nGibelike(madelin)\n\nNonpublic(madelin) and forall x (Nonpublic(x) -> Dissociate(x, elsbeth)) -> therefore Dissociate(madelin, elsbeth) Dissociate(madelin, elsbeth) and forall x (Dissociate(x, elsbeth) -> Dissociate(x, madelin)) -> therefore Dissociate(madelin, madelin) Dissociate(madelin, madelin) and forall x (Dissociate(x, madelin) -> Gibelike(x)) -> therefore Gibelike(madelin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The noni is optimum. The noni does not see the randolf. The randolf lapse the noni. If something lapse the noni and the noni is littered then it masticate the randolf. If something is optimum then it masticate the randolf. If the randolf is fleeceable and the randolf masticate the noni then the randolf serrate the noni. If the randolf masticate the noni then the randolf is not propulsive. If something serrate the noni and it masticate the randolf then the noni is polygamous. If something masticate the randolf then it masticate the noni. If something masticate the noni then it is littered. If something serrate the noni and the noni masticate the randolf then it does not need the noni. The noni is not littered.", "logic": "\nOptimum(noni)\nnot Serrate(noni, randolf)\nLapse(randolf, noni)\nforall x (Lapse(x, noni) and Littered(noni) -> Masticate(x, randolf))\nforall x (Optimum(x) -> Masticate(x, randolf))\nFleeceable(randolf) and Masticate(randolf, noni) -> Serrate(randolf, noni)\nMasticate(randolf, noni) -> not Propulsive(randolf)\nforall x (Serrate(x, noni) and Masticate(x, randolf) -> Polygamous(noni))\nforall x (Masticate(x, randolf) -> Masticate(x, noni))\nforall x (Masticate(x, noni) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Serrate(x, noni) and Masticate(noni, randolf) -> not Lapse(x, noni))\n\nnot Littered(noni)\n\nOptimum(noni) and forall x (Optimum(x) -> Masticate(x, randolf)) -> therefore Masticate(noni, randolf) Masticate(noni, randolf) and forall x (Masticate(x, randolf) -> Masticate(x, noni)) -> therefore Masticate(noni, noni) Masticate(noni, noni) and forall x (Masticate(x, noni) -> Littered(x)) -> therefore Littered(noni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The claudetta is busty. The claudetta does not see the faustine. The faustine cascade the claudetta. If something cascade the claudetta and the claudetta is fictional then it promulgate the faustine. If something is busty then it promulgate the faustine. If the faustine is former and the faustine promulgate the claudetta then the faustine dulcify the claudetta. If the faustine promulgate the claudetta then the faustine is not methylated. If something dulcify the claudetta and it promulgate the faustine then the claudetta is semisolid. If something promulgate the faustine then it promulgate the claudetta. If something promulgate the claudetta then it is fictional. If something dulcify the claudetta and the claudetta promulgate the faustine then it does not need the claudetta. The claudetta is not semisolid.", "logic": "\nBusty(claudetta)\nnot Dulcify(claudetta, faustine)\nCascade(faustine, claudetta)\nforall x (Cascade(x, claudetta) and Fictional(claudetta) -> Promulgate(x, faustine))\nforall x (Busty(x) -> Promulgate(x, faustine))\nFormer(faustine) and Promulgate(faustine, claudetta) -> Dulcify(faustine, claudetta)\nPromulgate(faustine, claudetta) -> not Methylated(faustine)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, claudetta) and Promulgate(x, faustine) -> Semisolid(claudetta))\nforall x (Promulgate(x, faustine) -> Promulgate(x, claudetta))\nforall x (Promulgate(x, claudetta) -> Fictional(x))\nforall x (Dulcify(x, claudetta) and Promulgate(claudetta, faustine) -> not Cascade(x, claudetta))\n\nnot Semisolid(claudetta)\n\nforall x (Dulcify(x, claudetta) and Promulgate(x, faustine) -> Semisolid(claudetta)) <- Former(faustine) and Promulgate(faustine, claudetta) -> Dulcify(faustine, claudetta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The phillipp is wavy. The phillipp does not see the emily. The emily croon the phillipp. If something croon the phillipp and the phillipp is lubberly then it assoil the emily. If something is wavy then it assoil the emily. If the emily is monotone and the emily assoil the phillipp then the emily incommode the phillipp. If the emily assoil the phillipp then the emily is not pendulous. If something incommode the phillipp and it assoil the emily then the phillipp is afrikaans. If something assoil the emily then it assoil the phillipp. If something assoil the phillipp then it is lubberly. If something incommode the phillipp and the phillipp assoil the emily then it does not need the phillipp. The emily incommode the phillipp.", "logic": "\nWavy(phillipp)\nnot Incommode(phillipp, emily)\nCroon(emily, phillipp)\nforall x (Croon(x, phillipp) and Lubberly(phillipp) -> Assoil(x, emily))\nforall x (Wavy(x) -> Assoil(x, emily))\nMonotone(emily) and Assoil(emily, phillipp) -> Incommode(emily, phillipp)\nAssoil(emily, phillipp) -> not Pendulous(emily)\nforall x (Incommode(x, phillipp) and Assoil(x, emily) -> Afrikaans(phillipp))\nforall x (Assoil(x, emily) -> Assoil(x, phillipp))\nforall x (Assoil(x, phillipp) -> Lubberly(x))\nforall x (Incommode(x, phillipp) and Assoil(phillipp, emily) -> not Croon(x, phillipp))\n\nIncommode(emily, phillipp)\n\nMonotone(emily) and Assoil(emily, phillipp) -> Incommode(emily, phillipp) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The bethanne is isocyclic. The bethanne does not see the ahmet. The ahmet dawdle the bethanne. If something dawdle the bethanne and the bethanne is prenatal then it homogenize the ahmet. If something is isocyclic then it homogenize the ahmet. If the ahmet is calyceal and the ahmet homogenize the bethanne then the ahmet attain the bethanne. If the ahmet homogenize the bethanne then the ahmet is not analyzed. If something attain the bethanne and it homogenize the ahmet then the bethanne is inducive. If something homogenize the ahmet then it homogenize the bethanne. If something homogenize the bethanne then it is prenatal. If something attain the bethanne and the bethanne homogenize the ahmet then it does not need the bethanne. The ahmet is not calyceal.", "logic": "\nIsocyclic(bethanne)\nnot Attain(bethanne, ahmet)\nDawdle(ahmet, bethanne)\nforall x (Dawdle(x, bethanne) and Prenatal(bethanne) -> Homogenize(x, ahmet))\nforall x (Isocyclic(x) -> Homogenize(x, ahmet))\nCalyceal(ahmet) and Homogenize(ahmet, bethanne) -> Attain(ahmet, bethanne)\nHomogenize(ahmet, bethanne) -> not Analyzed(ahmet)\nforall x (Attain(x, bethanne) and Homogenize(x, ahmet) -> Inducive(bethanne))\nforall x (Homogenize(x, ahmet) -> Homogenize(x, bethanne))\nforall x (Homogenize(x, bethanne) -> Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Attain(x, bethanne) and Homogenize(bethanne, ahmet) -> not Dawdle(x, bethanne))\n\nnot Calyceal(ahmet)\n\nnot Calyceal(ahmet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The teresita is funded. The teresita does not see the ailyn. The ailyn bluster the teresita. If something bluster the teresita and the teresita is saved then it blitz the ailyn. If something is funded then it blitz the ailyn. If the ailyn is unstarred and the ailyn blitz the teresita then the ailyn neck the teresita. If the ailyn blitz the teresita then the ailyn is not frictional. If something neck the teresita and it blitz the ailyn then the teresita is asinine. If something blitz the ailyn then it blitz the teresita. If something blitz the teresita then it is saved. If something neck the teresita and the teresita blitz the ailyn then it does not need the teresita. The teresita bluster the ailyn.", "logic": "\nFunded(teresita)\nnot Neck(teresita, ailyn)\nBluster(ailyn, teresita)\nforall x (Bluster(x, teresita) and Saved(teresita) -> Blitz(x, ailyn))\nforall x (Funded(x) -> Blitz(x, ailyn))\nUnstarred(ailyn) and Blitz(ailyn, teresita) -> Neck(ailyn, teresita)\nBlitz(ailyn, teresita) -> not Frictional(ailyn)\nforall x (Neck(x, teresita) and Blitz(x, ailyn) -> Asinine(teresita))\nforall x (Blitz(x, ailyn) -> Blitz(x, teresita))\nforall x (Blitz(x, teresita) -> Saved(x))\nforall x (Neck(x, teresita) and Blitz(teresita, ailyn) -> not Bluster(x, teresita))\n\nBluster(teresita, ailyn)\n\nBluster(teresita, ailyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The danell is perianal. The danell does not see the hirsch. The hirsch lapse the danell. If something lapse the danell and the danell is necklike then it prerecord the hirsch. If something is perianal then it prerecord the hirsch. If the hirsch is choric and the hirsch prerecord the danell then the hirsch caper the danell. If the hirsch prerecord the danell then the hirsch is not relaxing. If something caper the danell and it prerecord the hirsch then the danell is unpunished. If something prerecord the hirsch then it prerecord the danell. If something prerecord the danell then it is necklike. If something caper the danell and the danell prerecord the hirsch then it does not need the danell. The danell does not need the danell.", "logic": "\nPerianal(danell)\nnot Caper(danell, hirsch)\nLapse(hirsch, danell)\nforall x (Lapse(x, danell) and Necklike(danell) -> Prerecord(x, hirsch))\nforall x (Perianal(x) -> Prerecord(x, hirsch))\nChoric(hirsch) and Prerecord(hirsch, danell) -> Caper(hirsch, danell)\nPrerecord(hirsch, danell) -> not Relaxing(hirsch)\nforall x (Caper(x, danell) and Prerecord(x, hirsch) -> Unpunished(danell))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, hirsch) -> Prerecord(x, danell))\nforall x (Prerecord(x, danell) -> Necklike(x))\nforall x (Caper(x, danell) and Prerecord(danell, hirsch) -> not Lapse(x, danell))\n\nnot Lapse(danell, danell)\n\nnot Lapse(danell, danell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The cherie is sudorific. The cherie does not see the reeta. The reeta shark the cherie. If something shark the cherie and the cherie is serpentine then it prepare the reeta. If something is sudorific then it prepare the reeta. If the reeta is bated and the reeta prepare the cherie then the reeta unlash the cherie. If the reeta prepare the cherie then the reeta is not blasting. If something unlash the cherie and it prepare the reeta then the cherie is believable. If something prepare the reeta then it prepare the cherie. If something prepare the cherie then it is serpentine. If something unlash the cherie and the cherie prepare the reeta then it does not need the cherie. The reeta unlash the reeta.", "logic": "\nSudorific(cherie)\nnot Unlash(cherie, reeta)\nShark(reeta, cherie)\nforall x (Shark(x, cherie) and Serpentine(cherie) -> Prepare(x, reeta))\nforall x (Sudorific(x) -> Prepare(x, reeta))\nBated(reeta) and Prepare(reeta, cherie) -> Unlash(reeta, cherie)\nPrepare(reeta, cherie) -> not Blasting(reeta)\nforall x (Unlash(x, cherie) and Prepare(x, reeta) -> Believable(cherie))\nforall x (Prepare(x, reeta) -> Prepare(x, cherie))\nforall x (Prepare(x, cherie) -> Serpentine(x))\nforall x (Unlash(x, cherie) and Prepare(cherie, reeta) -> not Shark(x, cherie))\n\nUnlash(reeta, reeta)\n\nUnlash(reeta, reeta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The endora is uncoiled. The endora does not see the pet. The pet decay the endora. If something decay the endora and the endora is peninsular then it alcoholize the pet. If something is uncoiled then it alcoholize the pet. If the pet is somnolent and the pet alcoholize the endora then the pet exempt the endora. If the pet alcoholize the endora then the pet is not degressive. If something exempt the endora and it alcoholize the pet then the endora is currish. If something alcoholize the pet then it alcoholize the endora. If something alcoholize the endora then it is peninsular. If something exempt the endora and the endora alcoholize the pet then it does not need the endora. The endora does not see the endora.", "logic": "\nUncoiled(endora)\nnot Exempt(endora, pet)\nDecay(pet, endora)\nforall x (Decay(x, endora) and Peninsular(endora) -> Alcoholize(x, pet))\nforall x (Uncoiled(x) -> Alcoholize(x, pet))\nSomnolent(pet) and Alcoholize(pet, endora) -> Exempt(pet, endora)\nAlcoholize(pet, endora) -> not Degressive(pet)\nforall x (Exempt(x, endora) and Alcoholize(x, pet) -> Currish(endora))\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, pet) -> Alcoholize(x, endora))\nforall x (Alcoholize(x, endora) -> Peninsular(x))\nforall x (Exempt(x, endora) and Alcoholize(endora, pet) -> not Decay(x, endora))\n\nnot Exempt(endora, endora)\n\nnot Exempt(endora, endora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The florie is randomised. The florie does not see the athena. The athena steel the florie. If something steel the florie and the florie is deckled then it dingdong the athena. If something is randomised then it dingdong the athena. If the athena is glittering and the athena dingdong the florie then the athena bespangle the florie. If the athena dingdong the florie then the athena is not alsatian. If something bespangle the florie and it dingdong the athena then the florie is uninviting. If something dingdong the athena then it dingdong the florie. If something dingdong the florie then it is deckled. If something bespangle the florie and the florie dingdong the athena then it does not need the florie. The athena is uninviting.", "logic": "\nRandomised(florie)\nnot Bespangle(florie, athena)\nSteel(athena, florie)\nforall x (Steel(x, florie) and Deckled(florie) -> Dingdong(x, athena))\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> Dingdong(x, athena))\nGlittering(athena) and Dingdong(athena, florie) -> Bespangle(athena, florie)\nDingdong(athena, florie) -> not Alsatian(athena)\nforall x (Bespangle(x, florie) and Dingdong(x, athena) -> Uninviting(florie))\nforall x (Dingdong(x, athena) -> Dingdong(x, florie))\nforall x (Dingdong(x, florie) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Bespangle(x, florie) and Dingdong(florie, athena) -> not Steel(x, florie))\n\nUninviting(athena)\n\nUninviting(athena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "Maynord is olfactory. Maynord is amicable. Maynord is oozy. Penn is olfactory. Penn is tawny. Penn is amicable. Penn is computable. Penn is rallying. Penn is oozy. Penn is deaf. All oozy things are amicable. All amicable things are tawny. If Maynord is deaf and Maynord is rallying then Maynord is tawny. All olfactory things are amicable. Young things are rallying. If something is oozy and tawny then it is deaf. If something is oozy and deaf then it is rallying. Nice things are olfactory. Maynord is amicable.", "logic": "\nOlfactory(maynord)\nAmicable(maynord)\nOozy(maynord)\nOlfactory(penn)\nTawny(penn)\nAmicable(penn)\nComputable(penn)\nRallying(penn)\nOozy(penn)\nDeaf(penn)\nforall x (Oozy(x) -> Amicable(x))\nforall x (Amicable(x) -> Tawny(x))\nDeaf(maynord) and Rallying(maynord) -> Tawny(maynord)\nforall x (Olfactory(x) -> Amicable(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Rallying(x))\nforall x (Oozy(x) and Tawny(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Oozy(x) and Deaf(x) -> Rallying(x))\nforall x (Amicable(x) -> Olfactory(x))\n\nAmicable(maynord)\n\ntherefore Amicable(maynord)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Mariska is sisterly. Mariska is worthy. Mariska is bifacial. Amos is sisterly. Amos is arboreal. Amos is worthy. Amos is highbrowed. Amos is moonstruck. Amos is bifacial. Amos is rancorous. All bifacial things are worthy. All worthy things are arboreal. If Mariska is rancorous and Mariska is moonstruck then Mariska is arboreal. All sisterly things are worthy. Young things are moonstruck. If something is bifacial and arboreal then it is rancorous. If something is bifacial and rancorous then it is moonstruck. Nice things are sisterly. Mariska is not sisterly.", "logic": "\nSisterly(mariska)\nWorthy(mariska)\nBifacial(mariska)\nSisterly(amos)\nArboreal(amos)\nWorthy(amos)\nHighbrowed(amos)\nMoonstruck(amos)\nBifacial(amos)\nRancorous(amos)\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Worthy(x))\nforall x (Worthy(x) -> Arboreal(x))\nRancorous(mariska) and Moonstruck(mariska) -> Arboreal(mariska)\nforall x (Sisterly(x) -> Worthy(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) -> Moonstruck(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Arboreal(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) and Rancorous(x) -> Moonstruck(x))\nforall x (Worthy(x) -> Sisterly(x))\n\nnot Sisterly(mariska)\n\ntherefore Sisterly(mariska)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Mersey is unitarian. Mersey is contiguous. Mersey is aphyllous. Catlin is unitarian. Catlin is vented. Catlin is contiguous. Catlin is rawboned. Catlin is modish. Catlin is aphyllous. Catlin is provoking. All aphyllous things are contiguous. All contiguous things are vented. If Mersey is provoking and Mersey is modish then Mersey is vented. All unitarian things are contiguous. Young things are modish. If something is aphyllous and vented then it is provoking. If something is aphyllous and provoking then it is modish. Nice things are unitarian. Mersey is vented.", "logic": "\nUnitarian(mersey)\nContiguous(mersey)\nAphyllous(mersey)\nUnitarian(catlin)\nVented(catlin)\nContiguous(catlin)\nRawboned(catlin)\nModish(catlin)\nAphyllous(catlin)\nProvoking(catlin)\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Vented(x))\nProvoking(mersey) and Modish(mersey) -> Vented(mersey)\nforall x (Unitarian(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Provoking(x) -> Modish(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) and Vented(x) -> Provoking(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) and Provoking(x) -> Modish(x))\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Unitarian(x))\n\nVented(mersey)\n\nContiguous(mersey) and forall x (Contiguous(x) -> Vented(x)) -> therefore Vented(mersey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Benjie is oscitant. Benjie is scanty. Benjie is shakedown. Clotilda is oscitant. Clotilda is thwartwise. Clotilda is scanty. Clotilda is zoic. Clotilda is mutual. Clotilda is shakedown. Clotilda is uncleared. All shakedown things are scanty. All scanty things are thwartwise. If Benjie is uncleared and Benjie is mutual then Benjie is thwartwise. All oscitant things are scanty. Young things are mutual. If something is shakedown and thwartwise then it is uncleared. If something is shakedown and uncleared then it is mutual. Nice things are oscitant. Benjie is not thwartwise.", "logic": "\nOscitant(benjie)\nScanty(benjie)\nShakedown(benjie)\nOscitant(clotilda)\nThwartwise(clotilda)\nScanty(clotilda)\nZoic(clotilda)\nMutual(clotilda)\nShakedown(clotilda)\nUncleared(clotilda)\nforall x (Shakedown(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Scanty(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nUncleared(benjie) and Mutual(benjie) -> Thwartwise(benjie)\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Uncleared(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) and Thwartwise(x) -> Uncleared(x))\nforall x (Shakedown(x) and Uncleared(x) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Scanty(x) -> Oscitant(x))\n\nnot Thwartwise(benjie)\n\nScanty(benjie) and forall x (Scanty(x) -> Thwartwise(x)) -> therefore Thwartwise(benjie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Emilio is auriform. Emilio is jesting. Emilio is coital. Riane is auriform. Riane is isotopic. Riane is jesting. Riane is european. Riane is colloquial. Riane is coital. Riane is muddy. All coital things are jesting. All jesting things are isotopic. If Emilio is muddy and Emilio is colloquial then Emilio is isotopic. All auriform things are jesting. Young things are colloquial. If something is coital and isotopic then it is muddy. If something is coital and muddy then it is colloquial. Nice things are auriform. Emilio is muddy.", "logic": "\nAuriform(emilio)\nJesting(emilio)\nCoital(emilio)\nAuriform(riane)\nIsotopic(riane)\nJesting(riane)\nEuropean(riane)\nColloquial(riane)\nCoital(riane)\nMuddy(riane)\nforall x (Coital(x) -> Jesting(x))\nforall x (Jesting(x) -> Isotopic(x))\nMuddy(emilio) and Colloquial(emilio) -> Isotopic(emilio)\nforall x (Auriform(x) -> Jesting(x))\nforall x (Muddy(x) -> Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Muddy(x))\nforall x (Coital(x) and Muddy(x) -> Colloquial(x))\nforall x (Jesting(x) -> Auriform(x))\n\nMuddy(emilio)\n\nJesting(emilio) and forall x (Jesting(x) -> Isotopic(x)) -> therefore Isotopic(emilio) Coital(emilio) and Isotopic(emilio) and forall x (Coital(x) and Isotopic(x) -> Muddy(x)) -> therefore Muddy(emilio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Milzie is sheepish. Milzie is summery. Milzie is resultant. Lazare is sheepish. Lazare is balding. Lazare is summery. Lazare is forensic. Lazare is right. Lazare is resultant. Lazare is predatory. All resultant things are summery. All summery things are balding. If Milzie is predatory and Milzie is right then Milzie is balding. All sheepish things are summery. Young things are right. If something is resultant and balding then it is predatory. If something is resultant and predatory then it is right. Nice things are sheepish. Milzie is not predatory.", "logic": "\nSheepish(milzie)\nSummery(milzie)\nResultant(milzie)\nSheepish(lazare)\nBalding(lazare)\nSummery(lazare)\nForensic(lazare)\nRight(lazare)\nResultant(lazare)\nPredatory(lazare)\nforall x (Resultant(x) -> Summery(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Balding(x))\nPredatory(milzie) and Right(milzie) -> Balding(milzie)\nforall x (Sheepish(x) -> Summery(x))\nforall x (Predatory(x) -> Right(x))\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Balding(x) -> Predatory(x))\nforall x (Resultant(x) and Predatory(x) -> Right(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Sheepish(x))\n\nnot Predatory(milzie)\n\nSummery(milzie) and forall x (Summery(x) -> Balding(x)) -> therefore Balding(milzie) Resultant(milzie) and Balding(milzie) and forall x (Resultant(x) and Balding(x) -> Predatory(x)) -> therefore Predatory(milzie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Filmore is inelegant. Filmore is bahamian. Filmore is unsalable. Kipp is inelegant. Kipp is dozy. Kipp is bahamian. Kipp is confiding. Kipp is offended. Kipp is unsalable. Kipp is monistic. All unsalable things are bahamian. All bahamian things are dozy. If Filmore is monistic and Filmore is offended then Filmore is dozy. All inelegant things are bahamian. Young things are offended. If something is unsalable and dozy then it is monistic. If something is unsalable and monistic then it is offended. Nice things are inelegant. Filmore is offended.", "logic": "\nInelegant(filmore)\nBahamian(filmore)\nUnsalable(filmore)\nInelegant(kipp)\nDozy(kipp)\nBahamian(kipp)\nConfiding(kipp)\nOffended(kipp)\nUnsalable(kipp)\nMonistic(kipp)\nforall x (Unsalable(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Dozy(x))\nMonistic(filmore) and Offended(filmore) -> Dozy(filmore)\nforall x (Inelegant(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Monistic(x) -> Offended(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) and Dozy(x) -> Monistic(x))\nforall x (Unsalable(x) and Monistic(x) -> Offended(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) -> Inelegant(x))\n\nOffended(filmore)\n\nBahamian(filmore) and forall x (Bahamian(x) -> Dozy(x)) -> therefore Dozy(filmore) Unsalable(filmore) and Dozy(filmore) and forall x (Unsalable(x) and Dozy(x) -> Monistic(x)) -> therefore Monistic(filmore) Monistic(filmore) and forall x (Monistic(x) -> Offended(x)) -> therefore Offended(filmore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "Guy is unhurried. Guy is lxxvi. Guy is motor. Stan is unhurried. Stan is pyretic. Stan is lxxvi. Stan is rental. Stan is vociferous. Stan is motor. Stan is unspoken. All motor things are lxxvi. All lxxvi things are pyretic. If Guy is unspoken and Guy is vociferous then Guy is pyretic. All unhurried things are lxxvi. Young things are vociferous. If something is motor and pyretic then it is unspoken. If something is motor and unspoken then it is vociferous. Nice things are unhurried. Guy is not vociferous.", "logic": "\nUnhurried(guy)\nLxxvi(guy)\nMotor(guy)\nUnhurried(stan)\nPyretic(stan)\nLxxvi(stan)\nRental(stan)\nVociferous(stan)\nMotor(stan)\nUnspoken(stan)\nforall x (Motor(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Pyretic(x))\nUnspoken(guy) and Vociferous(guy) -> Pyretic(guy)\nforall x (Unhurried(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Unspoken(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Motor(x) and Pyretic(x) -> Unspoken(x))\nforall x (Motor(x) and Unspoken(x) -> Vociferous(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Unhurried(x))\n\nnot Vociferous(guy)\n\nLxxvi(guy) and forall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Pyretic(x)) -> therefore Pyretic(guy) Motor(guy) and Pyretic(guy) and forall x (Motor(x) and Pyretic(x) -> Unspoken(x)) -> therefore Unspoken(guy) Unspoken(guy) and forall x (Unspoken(x) -> Vociferous(x)) -> therefore Vociferous(guy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1695"} {"premises": "The abbi dillydally the reggy. The abbi is flagellate. The reggy dillydally the nara. The reggy is exclusive. The reggy publicise the abbi. The nara dillydally the abbi. The nara is exclusive. If someone publicise the nara and the nara publicise the reggy then the reggy is numeral. If someone is numeral then they visit the reggy. If someone dillydally the nara and they are querulous then they like the nara. If the reggy is flagellate and the reggy dillydally the abbi then the reggy exorcise the nara. If someone publicise the reggy and the reggy dillydally the nara then they chase the reggy. If someone is exclusive then they chase the reggy. The nara dillydally the abbi.", "logic": "\nDillydally(abbi, reggy)\nFlagellate(abbi)\nDillydally(reggy, nara)\nExclusive(reggy)\nPublicise(reggy, abbi)\nDillydally(nara, abbi)\nExclusive(nara)\nforall x (Publicise(x, nara) and Publicise(nara, reggy) -> Numeral(reggy))\nforall x (Numeral(x) -> Exorcise(x, reggy))\nforall x (Dillydally(x, nara) and Querulous(x) -> Publicise(x, nara))\nFlagellate(reggy) and Dillydally(reggy, abbi) -> Exorcise(reggy, nara)\nforall x (Publicise(x, reggy) and Dillydally(reggy, nara) -> Dillydally(x, reggy))\nforall x (Exclusive(x) -> Dillydally(x, reggy))\n\nDillydally(nara, abbi)\n\ntherefore Dillydally(nara, abbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "The whitman centre the mariska. The whitman is formalized. The mariska centre the adger. The mariska is soggy. The mariska mount the whitman. The adger centre the whitman. The adger is soggy. If someone mount the adger and the adger mount the mariska then the mariska is coated. If someone is coated then they visit the mariska. If someone centre the adger and they are unstained then they like the adger. If the mariska is formalized and the mariska centre the whitman then the mariska coquette the adger. If someone mount the mariska and the mariska centre the adger then they chase the mariska. If someone is soggy then they chase the mariska. The mariska does not chase the adger.", "logic": "\nCentre(whitman, mariska)\nFormalized(whitman)\nCentre(mariska, adger)\nSoggy(mariska)\nMount(mariska, whitman)\nCentre(adger, whitman)\nSoggy(adger)\nforall x (Mount(x, adger) and Mount(adger, mariska) -> Coated(mariska))\nforall x (Coated(x) -> Coquette(x, mariska))\nforall x (Centre(x, adger) and Unstained(x) -> Mount(x, adger))\nFormalized(mariska) and Centre(mariska, whitman) -> Coquette(mariska, adger)\nforall x (Mount(x, mariska) and Centre(mariska, adger) -> Centre(x, mariska))\nforall x (Soggy(x) -> Centre(x, mariska))\n\nnot Centre(mariska, adger)\n\ntherefore Centre(mariska, adger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "The etheline castrate the eryn. The etheline is enchanting. The eryn castrate the jameson. The eryn is bulbaceous. The eryn hood the etheline. The jameson castrate the etheline. The jameson is bulbaceous. If someone hood the jameson and the jameson hood the eryn then the eryn is simplex. If someone is simplex then they visit the eryn. If someone castrate the jameson and they are wildcat then they like the jameson. If the eryn is enchanting and the eryn castrate the etheline then the eryn peptize the jameson. If someone hood the eryn and the eryn castrate the jameson then they chase the eryn. If someone is bulbaceous then they chase the eryn. The etheline does not like the jameson.", "logic": "\nCastrate(etheline, eryn)\nEnchanting(etheline)\nCastrate(eryn, jameson)\nBulbaceous(eryn)\nHood(eryn, etheline)\nCastrate(jameson, etheline)\nBulbaceous(jameson)\nforall x (Hood(x, jameson) and Hood(jameson, eryn) -> Simplex(eryn))\nforall x (Simplex(x) -> Peptize(x, eryn))\nforall x (Castrate(x, jameson) and Wildcat(x) -> Hood(x, jameson))\nEnchanting(eryn) and Castrate(eryn, etheline) -> Peptize(eryn, jameson)\nforall x (Hood(x, eryn) and Castrate(eryn, jameson) -> Castrate(x, eryn))\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) -> Castrate(x, eryn))\n\nnot Hood(etheline, jameson)\n\nforall x (Castrate(x, jameson) and Wildcat(x) -> Hood(x, jameson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "The aurlie apply the welch. The aurlie is cowled. The welch apply the kendall. The welch is arabic. The welch decompress the aurlie. The kendall apply the aurlie. The kendall is arabic. If someone decompress the kendall and the kendall decompress the welch then the welch is cybernetic. If someone is cybernetic then they visit the welch. If someone apply the kendall and they are antenatal then they like the kendall. If the welch is cowled and the welch apply the aurlie then the welch synthesise the kendall. If someone decompress the welch and the welch apply the kendall then they chase the welch. If someone is arabic then they chase the welch. The kendall is blue.", "logic": "\nApply(aurlie, welch)\nCowled(aurlie)\nApply(welch, kendall)\nArabic(welch)\nDecompress(welch, aurlie)\nApply(kendall, aurlie)\nArabic(kendall)\nforall x (Decompress(x, kendall) and Decompress(kendall, welch) -> Cybernetic(welch))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) -> Synthesise(x, welch))\nforall x (Apply(x, kendall) and Antenatal(x) -> Decompress(x, kendall))\nCowled(welch) and Apply(welch, aurlie) -> Synthesise(welch, kendall)\nforall x (Decompress(x, welch) and Apply(welch, kendall) -> Apply(x, welch))\nforall x (Arabic(x) -> Apply(x, welch))\n\nBlue(kendall)\n\nBlue(kendall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "Durand is kafkaesque. Zippy is glace. Zippy is kafkaesque. Zippy is glorified. Zippy is gambian. Zippy is ginger. Say is glace. Say is kafkaesque. Say is mystical. Say is glorified. Say is drumhead. Say is gambian. Say is ginger. Cam is mystical. Cam is glorified. Cam is gambian. Rough, glace people are glorified. If Say is gambian and Say is drumhead then Say is kafkaesque. All kafkaesque people are glorified. Zippy is kafkaesque.", "logic": "\nKafkaesque(durand)\nGlace(zippy)\nKafkaesque(zippy)\nGlorified(zippy)\nGambian(zippy)\nGinger(zippy)\nGlace(say)\nKafkaesque(say)\nMystical(say)\nGlorified(say)\nDrumhead(say)\nGambian(say)\nGinger(say)\nMystical(cam)\nGlorified(cam)\nGambian(cam)\nforall x (Gambian(x) and Glace(x) -> Glorified(x))\nGambian(say) and Drumhead(say) -> Kafkaesque(say)\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) -> Glorified(x))\n\nKafkaesque(zippy)\n\ntherefore Kafkaesque(zippy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Deeann is repetitive. Marlo is simple. Marlo is repetitive. Marlo is deformed. Marlo is pondering. Marlo is inaudible. Lenka is simple. Lenka is repetitive. Lenka is visceral. Lenka is deformed. Lenka is segregated. Lenka is pondering. Lenka is inaudible. Thaddeus is visceral. Thaddeus is deformed. Thaddeus is pondering. Rough, simple people are deformed. If Lenka is pondering and Lenka is segregated then Lenka is repetitive. All repetitive people are deformed. Marlo is not simple.", "logic": "\nRepetitive(deeann)\nSimple(marlo)\nRepetitive(marlo)\nDeformed(marlo)\nPondering(marlo)\nInaudible(marlo)\nSimple(lenka)\nRepetitive(lenka)\nVisceral(lenka)\nDeformed(lenka)\nSegregated(lenka)\nPondering(lenka)\nInaudible(lenka)\nVisceral(thaddeus)\nDeformed(thaddeus)\nPondering(thaddeus)\nforall x (Pondering(x) and Simple(x) -> Deformed(x))\nPondering(lenka) and Segregated(lenka) -> Repetitive(lenka)\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> Deformed(x))\n\nnot Simple(marlo)\n\ntherefore Simple(marlo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Amandy is curvey. Kassandra is doughy. Kassandra is curvey. Kassandra is pawky. Kassandra is restive. Kassandra is endocrinal. Frances is doughy. Frances is curvey. Frances is mendicant. Frances is pawky. Frances is anionic. Frances is restive. Frances is endocrinal. Nellie is mendicant. Nellie is pawky. Nellie is restive. Rough, doughy people are pawky. If Frances is restive and Frances is anionic then Frances is curvey. All curvey people are pawky. Amandy is pawky.", "logic": "\nCurvey(amandy)\nDoughy(kassandra)\nCurvey(kassandra)\nPawky(kassandra)\nRestive(kassandra)\nEndocrinal(kassandra)\nDoughy(frances)\nCurvey(frances)\nMendicant(frances)\nPawky(frances)\nAnionic(frances)\nRestive(frances)\nEndocrinal(frances)\nMendicant(nellie)\nPawky(nellie)\nRestive(nellie)\nforall x (Restive(x) and Doughy(x) -> Pawky(x))\nRestive(frances) and Anionic(frances) -> Curvey(frances)\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Pawky(x))\n\nPawky(amandy)\n\nCurvey(amandy) and forall x (Curvey(x) -> Pawky(x)) -> therefore Pawky(amandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Myrah is avuncular. Domenic is sprawling. Domenic is avuncular. Domenic is deviate. Domenic is starting. Domenic is rhomboidal. Malissa is sprawling. Malissa is avuncular. Malissa is sulphuric. Malissa is deviate. Malissa is forced. Malissa is starting. Malissa is rhomboidal. Greg is sulphuric. Greg is deviate. Greg is starting. Rough, sprawling people are deviate. If Malissa is starting and Malissa is forced then Malissa is avuncular. All avuncular people are deviate. Myrah is not deviate.", "logic": "\nAvuncular(myrah)\nSprawling(domenic)\nAvuncular(domenic)\nDeviate(domenic)\nStarting(domenic)\nRhomboidal(domenic)\nSprawling(malissa)\nAvuncular(malissa)\nSulphuric(malissa)\nDeviate(malissa)\nForced(malissa)\nStarting(malissa)\nRhomboidal(malissa)\nSulphuric(greg)\nDeviate(greg)\nStarting(greg)\nforall x (Starting(x) and Sprawling(x) -> Deviate(x))\nStarting(malissa) and Forced(malissa) -> Avuncular(malissa)\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Deviate(x))\n\nnot Deviate(myrah)\n\nAvuncular(myrah) and forall x (Avuncular(x) -> Deviate(x)) -> therefore Deviate(myrah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Wilhelm is notorious. Claudius is fruiting. Claudius is notorious. Claudius is undated. Claudius is libelous. Claudius is untasted. Waylon is fruiting. Waylon is notorious. Waylon is bestial. Waylon is undated. Waylon is official. Waylon is libelous. Waylon is untasted. Frazier is bestial. Frazier is undated. Frazier is libelous. Rough, fruiting people are undated. If Waylon is libelous and Waylon is official then Waylon is notorious. All notorious people are undated. Wilhelm is not official.", "logic": "\nNotorious(wilhelm)\nFruiting(claudius)\nNotorious(claudius)\nUndated(claudius)\nLibelous(claudius)\nUntasted(claudius)\nFruiting(waylon)\nNotorious(waylon)\nBestial(waylon)\nUndated(waylon)\nOfficial(waylon)\nLibelous(waylon)\nUntasted(waylon)\nBestial(frazier)\nUndated(frazier)\nLibelous(frazier)\nforall x (Libelous(x) and Fruiting(x) -> Undated(x))\nLibelous(waylon) and Official(waylon) -> Notorious(waylon)\nforall x (Notorious(x) -> Undated(x))\n\nnot Official(wilhelm)\n\nnot Official(wilhelm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Isadora is emotive. Dorothea is lonesome. Dorothea is emotive. Dorothea is polymeric. Dorothea is tilted. Dorothea is asymmetric. Abdul is lonesome. Abdul is emotive. Abdul is mustached. Abdul is polymeric. Abdul is discreet. Abdul is tilted. Abdul is asymmetric. Bret is mustached. Bret is polymeric. Bret is tilted. Rough, lonesome people are polymeric. If Abdul is tilted and Abdul is discreet then Abdul is emotive. All emotive people are polymeric. Isadora is lonesome.", "logic": "\nEmotive(isadora)\nLonesome(dorothea)\nEmotive(dorothea)\nPolymeric(dorothea)\nTilted(dorothea)\nAsymmetric(dorothea)\nLonesome(abdul)\nEmotive(abdul)\nMustached(abdul)\nPolymeric(abdul)\nDiscreet(abdul)\nTilted(abdul)\nAsymmetric(abdul)\nMustached(bret)\nPolymeric(bret)\nTilted(bret)\nforall x (Tilted(x) and Lonesome(x) -> Polymeric(x))\nTilted(abdul) and Discreet(abdul) -> Emotive(abdul)\nforall x (Emotive(x) -> Polymeric(x))\n\nLonesome(isadora)\n\nLonesome(isadora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Sol is anesthetic. Willdon is droopy. Willdon is anesthetic. Willdon is human. Willdon is according. Willdon is towering. Karine is droopy. Karine is anesthetic. Karine is lush. Karine is human. Karine is epistolary. Karine is according. Karine is towering. Marlyn is lush. Marlyn is human. Marlyn is according. Rough, droopy people are human. If Karine is according and Karine is epistolary then Karine is anesthetic. All anesthetic people are human. Sol is not towering.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(sol)\nDroopy(willdon)\nAnesthetic(willdon)\nHuman(willdon)\nAccording(willdon)\nTowering(willdon)\nDroopy(karine)\nAnesthetic(karine)\nLush(karine)\nHuman(karine)\nEpistolary(karine)\nAccording(karine)\nTowering(karine)\nLush(marlyn)\nHuman(marlyn)\nAccording(marlyn)\nforall x (According(x) and Droopy(x) -> Human(x))\nAccording(karine) and Epistolary(karine) -> Anesthetic(karine)\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Human(x))\n\nnot Towering(sol)\n\nnot Towering(sol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Crista is separated. Roselin is avascular. Roselin is separated. Roselin is platelike. Roselin is unsheathed. Roselin is vulval. Ginnifer is avascular. Ginnifer is separated. Ginnifer is surgical. Ginnifer is platelike. Ginnifer is stillborn. Ginnifer is unsheathed. Ginnifer is vulval. Analise is surgical. Analise is platelike. Analise is unsheathed. Rough, avascular people are platelike. If Ginnifer is unsheathed and Ginnifer is stillborn then Ginnifer is separated. All separated people are platelike. Roselin is surgical.", "logic": "\nSeparated(crista)\nAvascular(roselin)\nSeparated(roselin)\nPlatelike(roselin)\nUnsheathed(roselin)\nVulval(roselin)\nAvascular(ginnifer)\nSeparated(ginnifer)\nSurgical(ginnifer)\nPlatelike(ginnifer)\nStillborn(ginnifer)\nUnsheathed(ginnifer)\nVulval(ginnifer)\nSurgical(analise)\nPlatelike(analise)\nUnsheathed(analise)\nforall x (Unsheathed(x) and Avascular(x) -> Platelike(x))\nUnsheathed(ginnifer) and Stillborn(ginnifer) -> Separated(ginnifer)\nforall x (Separated(x) -> Platelike(x))\n\nSurgical(roselin)\n\nSurgical(roselin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-73"} {"premises": "Aldric is defending. Ginger is encyclical. Ginger is endovenous. Michail is encyclical. Michail is liveborn. Brynne is mazy. Brynne is encyclical. Brynne is liveborn. Brynne is ottoman. Brynne is carotid. All endovenous people are defending. Round, endovenous people are encyclical. All liveborn, encyclical people are endovenous. Aldric is defending.", "logic": "\nDefending(aldric)\nEncyclical(ginger)\nEndovenous(ginger)\nEncyclical(michail)\nLiveborn(michail)\nMazy(brynne)\nEncyclical(brynne)\nLiveborn(brynne)\nOttoman(brynne)\nCarotid(brynne)\nforall x (Endovenous(x) -> Defending(x))\nforall x (Ottoman(x) and Endovenous(x) -> Encyclical(x))\nforall x (Liveborn(x) and Encyclical(x) -> Endovenous(x))\n\nDefending(aldric)\n\ntherefore Defending(aldric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Henriette is dumpy. Darrel is valvular. Darrel is rampant. Holli is valvular. Holli is zonal. Skyler is speedy. Skyler is valvular. Skyler is zonal. Skyler is modern. Skyler is flukey. All rampant people are dumpy. Round, rampant people are valvular. All zonal, valvular people are rampant. Darrel is not rampant.", "logic": "\nDumpy(henriette)\nValvular(darrel)\nRampant(darrel)\nValvular(holli)\nZonal(holli)\nSpeedy(skyler)\nValvular(skyler)\nZonal(skyler)\nModern(skyler)\nFlukey(skyler)\nforall x (Rampant(x) -> Dumpy(x))\nforall x (Modern(x) and Rampant(x) -> Valvular(x))\nforall x (Zonal(x) and Valvular(x) -> Rampant(x))\n\nnot Rampant(darrel)\n\ntherefore Rampant(darrel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Julissa is checked. Sonya is gallican. Sonya is drugless. Tiphani is gallican. Tiphani is earthly. Sonnnie is underived. Sonnnie is gallican. Sonnnie is earthly. Sonnnie is denudate. Sonnnie is appointive. All drugless people are checked. Round, drugless people are gallican. All earthly, gallican people are drugless. Sonnnie is drugless.", "logic": "\nChecked(julissa)\nGallican(sonya)\nDrugless(sonya)\nGallican(tiphani)\nEarthly(tiphani)\nUnderived(sonnnie)\nGallican(sonnnie)\nEarthly(sonnnie)\nDenudate(sonnnie)\nAppointive(sonnnie)\nforall x (Drugless(x) -> Checked(x))\nforall x (Denudate(x) and Drugless(x) -> Gallican(x))\nforall x (Earthly(x) and Gallican(x) -> Drugless(x))\n\nDrugless(sonnnie)\n\nEarthly(sonnnie) and Gallican(sonnnie) and forall x (Earthly(x) and Gallican(x) -> Drugless(x)) -> therefore Drugless(sonnnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Patti is afloat. Linn is frilled. Linn is fisheye. Marrissa is frilled. Marrissa is inherent. Davin is tethered. Davin is frilled. Davin is inherent. Davin is opening. Davin is leaky. All fisheye people are afloat. Round, fisheye people are frilled. All inherent, frilled people are fisheye. Marrissa is not fisheye.", "logic": "\nAfloat(patti)\nFrilled(linn)\nFisheye(linn)\nFrilled(marrissa)\nInherent(marrissa)\nTethered(davin)\nFrilled(davin)\nInherent(davin)\nOpening(davin)\nLeaky(davin)\nforall x (Fisheye(x) -> Afloat(x))\nforall x (Opening(x) and Fisheye(x) -> Frilled(x))\nforall x (Inherent(x) and Frilled(x) -> Fisheye(x))\n\nnot Fisheye(marrissa)\n\nInherent(marrissa) and Frilled(marrissa) and forall x (Inherent(x) and Frilled(x) -> Fisheye(x)) -> therefore Fisheye(marrissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Paulo is fineable. Buck is allophonic. Buck is unplaced. Hilarie is allophonic. Hilarie is mirthful. Megan is denuded. Megan is allophonic. Megan is mirthful. Megan is calcuttan. Megan is social. All unplaced people are fineable. Round, unplaced people are allophonic. All mirthful, allophonic people are unplaced. Hilarie is fineable.", "logic": "\nFineable(paulo)\nAllophonic(buck)\nUnplaced(buck)\nAllophonic(hilarie)\nMirthful(hilarie)\nDenuded(megan)\nAllophonic(megan)\nMirthful(megan)\nCalcuttan(megan)\nSocial(megan)\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Fineable(x))\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Allophonic(x))\nforall x (Mirthful(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Unplaced(x))\n\nFineable(hilarie)\n\nMirthful(hilarie) and Allophonic(hilarie) and forall x (Mirthful(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Unplaced(x)) -> therefore Unplaced(hilarie) Unplaced(hilarie) and forall x (Unplaced(x) -> Fineable(x)) -> therefore Fineable(hilarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Ingamar is defamatory. Jeremias is himalayan. Jeremias is stagey. Faina is himalayan. Faina is hatted. Cornelia is barricaded. Cornelia is himalayan. Cornelia is hatted. Cornelia is siamese. Cornelia is unreliable. All stagey people are defamatory. Round, stagey people are himalayan. All hatted, himalayan people are stagey. Faina is not defamatory.", "logic": "\nDefamatory(ingamar)\nHimalayan(jeremias)\nStagey(jeremias)\nHimalayan(faina)\nHatted(faina)\nBarricaded(cornelia)\nHimalayan(cornelia)\nHatted(cornelia)\nSiamese(cornelia)\nUnreliable(cornelia)\nforall x (Stagey(x) -> Defamatory(x))\nforall x (Siamese(x) and Stagey(x) -> Himalayan(x))\nforall x (Hatted(x) and Himalayan(x) -> Stagey(x))\n\nnot Defamatory(faina)\n\nHatted(faina) and Himalayan(faina) and forall x (Hatted(x) and Himalayan(x) -> Stagey(x)) -> therefore Stagey(faina) Stagey(faina) and forall x (Stagey(x) -> Defamatory(x)) -> therefore Defamatory(faina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Elena is ventricous. Carlton is misogynic. Carlton is fogged. Maurie is misogynic. Maurie is astringent. Bobbie is hollow. Bobbie is misogynic. Bobbie is astringent. Bobbie is chaotic. Bobbie is strangled. All fogged people are ventricous. Round, fogged people are misogynic. All astringent, misogynic people are fogged. Elena is not fogged.", "logic": "\nVentricous(elena)\nMisogynic(carlton)\nFogged(carlton)\nMisogynic(maurie)\nAstringent(maurie)\nHollow(bobbie)\nMisogynic(bobbie)\nAstringent(bobbie)\nChaotic(bobbie)\nStrangled(bobbie)\nforall x (Fogged(x) -> Ventricous(x))\nforall x (Chaotic(x) and Fogged(x) -> Misogynic(x))\nforall x (Astringent(x) and Misogynic(x) -> Fogged(x))\n\nnot Fogged(elena)\n\nforall x (Astringent(x) and Misogynic(x) -> Fogged(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Upton is vocalic. Blaire is unimpaired. Blaire is eyed. Barbara is unimpaired. Barbara is crass. Adelaide is radical. Adelaide is unimpaired. Adelaide is crass. Adelaide is faddish. Adelaide is bright. All eyed people are vocalic. Round, eyed people are unimpaired. All crass, unimpaired people are eyed. Upton is unimpaired.", "logic": "\nVocalic(upton)\nUnimpaired(blaire)\nEyed(blaire)\nUnimpaired(barbara)\nCrass(barbara)\nRadical(adelaide)\nUnimpaired(adelaide)\nCrass(adelaide)\nFaddish(adelaide)\nBright(adelaide)\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Vocalic(x))\nforall x (Faddish(x) and Eyed(x) -> Unimpaired(x))\nforall x (Crass(x) and Unimpaired(x) -> Eyed(x))\n\nUnimpaired(upton)\n\nforall x (Faddish(x) and Eyed(x) -> Unimpaired(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Kiele is habitable. Titos is arrogant. Titos is twiggy. Wang is arrogant. Wang is obliging. Hewe is coinciding. Hewe is arrogant. Hewe is obliging. Hewe is rational. Hewe is heretical. All twiggy people are habitable. Round, twiggy people are arrogant. All obliging, arrogant people are twiggy. Wang is not rational.", "logic": "\nHabitable(kiele)\nArrogant(titos)\nTwiggy(titos)\nArrogant(wang)\nObliging(wang)\nCoinciding(hewe)\nArrogant(hewe)\nObliging(hewe)\nRational(hewe)\nHeretical(hewe)\nforall x (Twiggy(x) -> Habitable(x))\nforall x (Rational(x) and Twiggy(x) -> Arrogant(x))\nforall x (Obliging(x) and Arrogant(x) -> Twiggy(x))\n\nnot Rational(wang)\n\nnot Rational(wang) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Joice is edwardian. Abelard is flowering. Abelard is employed. Martina is flowering. Martina is sure. Terrell is befuddled. Terrell is flowering. Terrell is sure. Terrell is livery. Terrell is detonative. All employed people are edwardian. Round, employed people are flowering. All sure, flowering people are employed. Abelard is detonative.", "logic": "\nEdwardian(joice)\nFlowering(abelard)\nEmployed(abelard)\nFlowering(martina)\nSure(martina)\nBefuddled(terrell)\nFlowering(terrell)\nSure(terrell)\nLivery(terrell)\nDetonative(terrell)\nforall x (Employed(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Livery(x) and Employed(x) -> Flowering(x))\nforall x (Sure(x) and Flowering(x) -> Employed(x))\n\nDetonative(abelard)\n\nDetonative(abelard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Shelley is bipartizan. Pablo is itchy. Pablo is celebrated. Sander is itchy. Sander is isomeric. Nike is wilted. Nike is itchy. Nike is isomeric. Nike is blameable. Nike is mouldy. All celebrated people are bipartizan. Round, celebrated people are itchy. All isomeric, itchy people are celebrated. Sander is not mouldy.", "logic": "\nBipartizan(shelley)\nItchy(pablo)\nCelebrated(pablo)\nItchy(sander)\nIsomeric(sander)\nWilted(nike)\nItchy(nike)\nIsomeric(nike)\nBlameable(nike)\nMouldy(nike)\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Bipartizan(x))\nforall x (Blameable(x) and Celebrated(x) -> Itchy(x))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) and Itchy(x) -> Celebrated(x))\n\nnot Mouldy(sander)\n\nnot Mouldy(sander) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Nessy is censorial. Gwenneth is enumerable. Gwenneth is ordained. Daffi is enumerable. Daffi is remaining. Kalle is bustling. Kalle is enumerable. Kalle is remaining. Kalle is bahamian. Kalle is pleading. All ordained people are censorial. Round, ordained people are enumerable. All remaining, enumerable people are ordained. Gwenneth is bustling.", "logic": "\nCensorial(nessy)\nEnumerable(gwenneth)\nOrdained(gwenneth)\nEnumerable(daffi)\nRemaining(daffi)\nBustling(kalle)\nEnumerable(kalle)\nRemaining(kalle)\nBahamian(kalle)\nPleading(kalle)\nforall x (Ordained(x) -> Censorial(x))\nforall x (Bahamian(x) and Ordained(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Remaining(x) and Enumerable(x) -> Ordained(x))\n\nBustling(gwenneth)\n\nBustling(gwenneth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1581"} {"premises": "Nesta is religious. Joane is not measly. Zorine is not showery. Big, showery things are religious. If something is measly and religious then it is uphill. Rough, showery things are repressing. All tarsal, washable things are not repressing. Blue things are measly. All religious, uphill things are tarsal. Zorine is not showery.", "logic": "\nReligious(nesta)\nnot Measly(joane)\nnot Showery(zorine)\nforall x (Washable(x) and Showery(x) -> Religious(x))\nforall x (Measly(x) and Religious(x) -> Uphill(x))\nforall x (Uphill(x) and Showery(x) -> Repressing(x))\nforall x (Tarsal(x) and Washable(x) -> not Repressing(x))\nforall x (Religious(x) -> Measly(x))\nforall x (Religious(x) and Uphill(x) -> Tarsal(x))\n\nnot Showery(zorine)\n\ntherefore not Showery(zorine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Guendolen is famed. Shayla is not caseous. Chloris is not biradial. Big, biradial things are famed. If something is caseous and famed then it is hygienical. Rough, biradial things are dizzy. All savoury, spousal things are not dizzy. Blue things are caseous. All famed, hygienical things are savoury. Chloris is biradial.", "logic": "\nFamed(guendolen)\nnot Caseous(shayla)\nnot Biradial(chloris)\nforall x (Spousal(x) and Biradial(x) -> Famed(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) and Famed(x) -> Hygienical(x))\nforall x (Hygienical(x) and Biradial(x) -> Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Savoury(x) and Spousal(x) -> not Dizzy(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) -> Caseous(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Hygienical(x) -> Savoury(x))\n\nBiradial(chloris)\n\ntherefore not Biradial(chloris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Vaughan is presbyopic. Berkie is not unroofed. Norbert is not plastic. Big, plastic things are presbyopic. If something is unroofed and presbyopic then it is watered. Rough, plastic things are basidial. All postmortal, slanderous things are not basidial. Blue things are unroofed. All presbyopic, watered things are postmortal. Vaughan is unroofed.", "logic": "\nPresbyopic(vaughan)\nnot Unroofed(berkie)\nnot Plastic(norbert)\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Plastic(x) -> Presbyopic(x))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) and Presbyopic(x) -> Watered(x))\nforall x (Watered(x) and Plastic(x) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Postmortal(x) and Slanderous(x) -> not Basidial(x))\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Presbyopic(x) and Watered(x) -> Postmortal(x))\n\nUnroofed(vaughan)\n\nPresbyopic(vaughan) and forall x (Presbyopic(x) -> Unroofed(x)) -> therefore Unroofed(vaughan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Sileas is indian. Roselyn is not outflowing. Istvan is not valved. Big, valved things are indian. If something is outflowing and indian then it is tonal. Rough, valved things are iridescent. All rolled, fusiform things are not iridescent. Blue things are outflowing. All indian, tonal things are rolled. Sileas is not outflowing.", "logic": "\nIndian(sileas)\nnot Outflowing(roselyn)\nnot Valved(istvan)\nforall x (Fusiform(x) and Valved(x) -> Indian(x))\nforall x (Outflowing(x) and Indian(x) -> Tonal(x))\nforall x (Tonal(x) and Valved(x) -> Iridescent(x))\nforall x (Rolled(x) and Fusiform(x) -> not Iridescent(x))\nforall x (Indian(x) -> Outflowing(x))\nforall x (Indian(x) and Tonal(x) -> Rolled(x))\n\nnot Outflowing(sileas)\n\nIndian(sileas) and forall x (Indian(x) -> Outflowing(x)) -> therefore Outflowing(sileas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Braden is hybrid. Rutter is not fingerless. Jennica is not consuming. Big, consuming things are hybrid. If something is fingerless and hybrid then it is iritic. Rough, consuming things are sadducean. All unrhymed, dormy things are not sadducean. Blue things are fingerless. All hybrid, iritic things are unrhymed. Braden is iritic.", "logic": "\nHybrid(braden)\nnot Fingerless(rutter)\nnot Consuming(jennica)\nforall x (Dormy(x) and Consuming(x) -> Hybrid(x))\nforall x (Fingerless(x) and Hybrid(x) -> Iritic(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) and Consuming(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and Dormy(x) -> not Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) -> Fingerless(x))\nforall x (Hybrid(x) and Iritic(x) -> Unrhymed(x))\n\nIritic(braden)\n\nHybrid(braden) and forall x (Hybrid(x) -> Fingerless(x)) -> therefore Fingerless(braden) Fingerless(braden) and Hybrid(braden) and forall x (Fingerless(x) and Hybrid(x) -> Iritic(x)) -> therefore Iritic(braden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Noe is hipless. Brenn is not depilous. Dwight is not evident. Big, evident things are hipless. If something is depilous and hipless then it is irritated. Rough, evident things are wellborn. All fogbound, uncombined things are not wellborn. Blue things are depilous. All hipless, irritated things are fogbound. Noe is not irritated.", "logic": "\nHipless(noe)\nnot Depilous(brenn)\nnot Evident(dwight)\nforall x (Uncombined(x) and Evident(x) -> Hipless(x))\nforall x (Depilous(x) and Hipless(x) -> Irritated(x))\nforall x (Irritated(x) and Evident(x) -> Wellborn(x))\nforall x (Fogbound(x) and Uncombined(x) -> not Wellborn(x))\nforall x (Hipless(x) -> Depilous(x))\nforall x (Hipless(x) and Irritated(x) -> Fogbound(x))\n\nnot Irritated(noe)\n\nHipless(noe) and forall x (Hipless(x) -> Depilous(x)) -> therefore Depilous(noe) Depilous(noe) and Hipless(noe) and forall x (Depilous(x) and Hipless(x) -> Irritated(x)) -> therefore Irritated(noe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Shara is useless. Salvidor is not minded. Halvard is not uninformed. Big, uninformed things are useless. If something is minded and useless then it is wavelike. Rough, uninformed things are preachy. All bumbling, flabby things are not preachy. Blue things are minded. All useless, wavelike things are bumbling. Shara is bumbling.", "logic": "\nUseless(shara)\nnot Minded(salvidor)\nnot Uninformed(halvard)\nforall x (Flabby(x) and Uninformed(x) -> Useless(x))\nforall x (Minded(x) and Useless(x) -> Wavelike(x))\nforall x (Wavelike(x) and Uninformed(x) -> Preachy(x))\nforall x (Bumbling(x) and Flabby(x) -> not Preachy(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Minded(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) and Wavelike(x) -> Bumbling(x))\n\nBumbling(shara)\n\nUseless(shara) and forall x (Useless(x) -> Minded(x)) -> therefore Minded(shara) Minded(shara) and Useless(shara) and forall x (Minded(x) and Useless(x) -> Wavelike(x)) -> therefore Wavelike(shara) Useless(shara) and Wavelike(shara) and forall x (Useless(x) and Wavelike(x) -> Bumbling(x)) -> therefore Bumbling(shara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Domenic is jacobean. Broderick is not provincial. Valina is not naval. Big, naval things are jacobean. If something is provincial and jacobean then it is acarpelous. Rough, naval things are formed. All defoliate, rhizoidal things are not formed. Blue things are provincial. All jacobean, acarpelous things are defoliate. Domenic is not defoliate.", "logic": "\nJacobean(domenic)\nnot Provincial(broderick)\nnot Naval(valina)\nforall x (Rhizoidal(x) and Naval(x) -> Jacobean(x))\nforall x (Provincial(x) and Jacobean(x) -> Acarpelous(x))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) and Naval(x) -> Formed(x))\nforall x (Defoliate(x) and Rhizoidal(x) -> not Formed(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Jacobean(x) and Acarpelous(x) -> Defoliate(x))\n\nnot Defoliate(domenic)\n\nJacobean(domenic) and forall x (Jacobean(x) -> Provincial(x)) -> therefore Provincial(domenic) Provincial(domenic) and Jacobean(domenic) and forall x (Provincial(x) and Jacobean(x) -> Acarpelous(x)) -> therefore Acarpelous(domenic) Jacobean(domenic) and Acarpelous(domenic) and forall x (Jacobean(x) and Acarpelous(x) -> Defoliate(x)) -> therefore Defoliate(domenic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Trever is segregated. Mellicent is not dented. Irina is not blustering. Big, blustering things are segregated. If something is dented and segregated then it is free. Rough, blustering things are rayless. All unverified, unexpended things are not rayless. Blue things are dented. All segregated, free things are unverified. Irina is not segregated.", "logic": "\nSegregated(trever)\nnot Dented(mellicent)\nnot Blustering(irina)\nforall x (Unexpended(x) and Blustering(x) -> Segregated(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) and Segregated(x) -> Free(x))\nforall x (Free(x) and Blustering(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Unverified(x) and Unexpended(x) -> not Rayless(x))\nforall x (Segregated(x) -> Dented(x))\nforall x (Segregated(x) and Free(x) -> Unverified(x))\n\nnot Segregated(irina)\n\nforall x (Unexpended(x) and Blustering(x) -> Segregated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Fran is hazy. Aurel is not desolate. Edy is not sissified. Big, sissified things are hazy. If something is desolate and hazy then it is compressed. Rough, sissified things are expert. All hindering, flaccid things are not expert. Blue things are desolate. All hazy, compressed things are hindering. Aurel is compressed.", "logic": "\nHazy(fran)\nnot Desolate(aurel)\nnot Sissified(edy)\nforall x (Flaccid(x) and Sissified(x) -> Hazy(x))\nforall x (Desolate(x) and Hazy(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Compressed(x) and Sissified(x) -> Expert(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) and Flaccid(x) -> not Expert(x))\nforall x (Hazy(x) -> Desolate(x))\nforall x (Hazy(x) and Compressed(x) -> Hindering(x))\n\nCompressed(aurel)\n\nforall x (Desolate(x) and Hazy(x) -> Compressed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Phylys is uncured. See is not funded. Emilee is not aldehydic. Big, aldehydic things are uncured. If something is funded and uncured then it is popular. Rough, aldehydic things are macedonian. All heliac, paperlike things are not macedonian. Blue things are funded. All uncured, popular things are heliac. Phylys is not macedonian.", "logic": "\nUncured(phylys)\nnot Funded(see)\nnot Aldehydic(emilee)\nforall x (Paperlike(x) and Aldehydic(x) -> Uncured(x))\nforall x (Funded(x) and Uncured(x) -> Popular(x))\nforall x (Popular(x) and Aldehydic(x) -> Macedonian(x))\nforall x (Heliac(x) and Paperlike(x) -> not Macedonian(x))\nforall x (Uncured(x) -> Funded(x))\nforall x (Uncured(x) and Popular(x) -> Heliac(x))\n\nnot Macedonian(phylys)\n\nforall x (Popular(x) and Aldehydic(x) -> Macedonian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Terrie is defeated. Marry is not combatant. Janot is not broody. Big, broody things are defeated. If something is combatant and defeated then it is isopteran. Rough, broody things are dead. All beneficed, endodontic things are not dead. Blue things are combatant. All defeated, isopteran things are beneficed. Janot is dead.", "logic": "\nDefeated(terrie)\nnot Combatant(marry)\nnot Broody(janot)\nforall x (Endodontic(x) and Broody(x) -> Defeated(x))\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Defeated(x) -> Isopteran(x))\nforall x (Isopteran(x) and Broody(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Beneficed(x) and Endodontic(x) -> not Dead(x))\nforall x (Defeated(x) -> Combatant(x))\nforall x (Defeated(x) and Isopteran(x) -> Beneficed(x))\n\nDead(janot)\n\nforall x (Isopteran(x) and Broody(x) -> Dead(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Floyd is baric. Murray is not bumbling. Garwood is not silky. Big, silky things are baric. If something is bumbling and baric then it is aloof. Rough, silky things are vestiary. All bald, nilotic things are not vestiary. Blue things are bumbling. All baric, aloof things are bald. Floyd is not silky.", "logic": "\nBaric(floyd)\nnot Bumbling(murray)\nnot Silky(garwood)\nforall x (Nilotic(x) and Silky(x) -> Baric(x))\nforall x (Bumbling(x) and Baric(x) -> Aloof(x))\nforall x (Aloof(x) and Silky(x) -> Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Bald(x) and Nilotic(x) -> not Vestiary(x))\nforall x (Baric(x) -> Bumbling(x))\nforall x (Baric(x) and Aloof(x) -> Bald(x))\n\nnot Silky(floyd)\n\nnot Silky(floyd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Eartha is haphazard. Evvy is not athletic. Wyndham is not unploughed. Big, unploughed things are haphazard. If something is athletic and haphazard then it is conniving. Rough, unploughed things are bald. All unended, ammoniacal things are not bald. Blue things are athletic. All haphazard, conniving things are unended. Evvy is unploughed.", "logic": "\nHaphazard(eartha)\nnot Athletic(evvy)\nnot Unploughed(wyndham)\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) and Unploughed(x) -> Haphazard(x))\nforall x (Athletic(x) and Haphazard(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Conniving(x) and Unploughed(x) -> Bald(x))\nforall x (Unended(x) and Ammoniacal(x) -> not Bald(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) -> Athletic(x))\nforall x (Haphazard(x) and Conniving(x) -> Unended(x))\n\nUnploughed(evvy)\n\nUnploughed(evvy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Jeanelle is alacritous. Nidia is not stolid. Adolpho is not bedded. Big, bedded things are alacritous. If something is stolid and alacritous then it is convergent. Rough, bedded things are redbrick. All hairless, recyclable things are not redbrick. Blue things are stolid. All alacritous, convergent things are hairless. Jeanelle is not recyclable.", "logic": "\nAlacritous(jeanelle)\nnot Stolid(nidia)\nnot Bedded(adolpho)\nforall x (Recyclable(x) and Bedded(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Stolid(x) and Alacritous(x) -> Convergent(x))\nforall x (Convergent(x) and Bedded(x) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) and Recyclable(x) -> not Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) -> Stolid(x))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) and Convergent(x) -> Hairless(x))\n\nnot Recyclable(jeanelle)\n\nnot Recyclable(jeanelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Jabez is snorty. Giorgi is not monistic. Keelia is not encircled. Big, encircled things are snorty. If something is monistic and snorty then it is harmonic. Rough, encircled things are elaborated. All stentorian, burly things are not elaborated. Blue things are monistic. All snorty, harmonic things are stentorian. Keelia is burly.", "logic": "\nSnorty(jabez)\nnot Monistic(giorgi)\nnot Encircled(keelia)\nforall x (Burly(x) and Encircled(x) -> Snorty(x))\nforall x (Monistic(x) and Snorty(x) -> Harmonic(x))\nforall x (Harmonic(x) and Encircled(x) -> Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Stentorian(x) and Burly(x) -> not Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Snorty(x) -> Monistic(x))\nforall x (Snorty(x) and Harmonic(x) -> Stentorian(x))\n\nBurly(keelia)\n\nBurly(keelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1684"} {"premises": "Vick is semiarid. Vick is obtrusive. Vick is scraggly. Vick is denuded. Vick is devouring. Vick is calorific. Vick is affable. If something is denuded then it is devouring. Vick is devouring.", "logic": "\nSemiarid(vick)\nObtrusive(vick)\nScraggly(vick)\nDenuded(vick)\nDevouring(vick)\nCalorific(vick)\nAffable(vick)\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Devouring(x))\n\nDevouring(vick)\n\ntherefore Devouring(vick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4080"} {"premises": "Jada is drear. Jada is caramel. Jada is curdled. Jada is faint. Jada is serial. Jada is acidulent. Jada is thinned. If something is faint then it is serial. Jada is not acidulent.", "logic": "\nDrear(jada)\nCaramel(jada)\nCurdled(jada)\nFaint(jada)\nSerial(jada)\nAcidulent(jada)\nThinned(jada)\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Serial(x))\n\nnot Acidulent(jada)\n\ntherefore Acidulent(jada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4080"} {"premises": "King is not prussian. Nicola is tetragonal. Chastity is kantian. All tetragonal things are diverted. All diverted things are noticeable. If something is diverted and not kantian then it is not tetragonal. All kantian things are tetragonal. If Nicola is diverted then Nicola is prussian. All kantian, diverted things are embodied. Nicola is tetragonal.", "logic": "\nnot Prussian(king)\nTetragonal(nicola)\nKantian(chastity)\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) -> Diverted(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) -> Noticeable(x))\nforall x (Diverted(x) and not Kantian(x) -> not Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Kantian(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nDiverted(nicola) -> Prussian(nicola)\nforall x (Kantian(x) and Diverted(x) -> Embodied(x))\n\nTetragonal(nicola)\n\ntherefore Tetragonal(nicola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Chandal is not augustan. Olympia is enlivened. Dirk is ruminative. All enlivened things are ultra. All ultra things are pustulate. If something is ultra and not ruminative then it is not enlivened. All ruminative things are enlivened. If Olympia is ultra then Olympia is augustan. All ruminative, ultra things are seeable. Olympia is not enlivened.", "logic": "\nnot Augustan(chandal)\nEnlivened(olympia)\nRuminative(dirk)\nforall x (Enlivened(x) -> Ultra(x))\nforall x (Ultra(x) -> Pustulate(x))\nforall x (Ultra(x) and not Ruminative(x) -> not Enlivened(x))\nforall x (Ruminative(x) -> Enlivened(x))\nUltra(olympia) -> Augustan(olympia)\nforall x (Ruminative(x) and Ultra(x) -> Seeable(x))\n\nnot Enlivened(olympia)\n\ntherefore Enlivened(olympia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Iago is not adorned. Ashely is modulated. Cleva is uncovered. All modulated things are unrelieved. All unrelieved things are enfeebling. If something is unrelieved and not uncovered then it is not modulated. All uncovered things are modulated. If Ashely is unrelieved then Ashely is adorned. All uncovered, unrelieved things are uncrowded. Ashely is unrelieved.", "logic": "\nnot Adorned(iago)\nModulated(ashely)\nUncovered(cleva)\nforall x (Modulated(x) -> Unrelieved(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) -> Enfeebling(x))\nforall x (Unrelieved(x) and not Uncovered(x) -> not Modulated(x))\nforall x (Uncovered(x) -> Modulated(x))\nUnrelieved(ashely) -> Adorned(ashely)\nforall x (Uncovered(x) and Unrelieved(x) -> Uncrowded(x))\n\nUnrelieved(ashely)\n\nModulated(ashely) and forall x (Modulated(x) -> Unrelieved(x)) -> therefore Unrelieved(ashely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Belle is not antidromic. Jeromy is textured. Jerrie is haired. All textured things are undefiled. All undefiled things are sepaline. If something is undefiled and not haired then it is not textured. All haired things are textured. If Jeromy is undefiled then Jeromy is antidromic. All haired, undefiled things are delimited. Jerrie is not textured.", "logic": "\nnot Antidromic(belle)\nTextured(jeromy)\nHaired(jerrie)\nforall x (Textured(x) -> Undefiled(x))\nforall x (Undefiled(x) -> Sepaline(x))\nforall x (Undefiled(x) and not Haired(x) -> not Textured(x))\nforall x (Haired(x) -> Textured(x))\nUndefiled(jeromy) -> Antidromic(jeromy)\nforall x (Haired(x) and Undefiled(x) -> Delimited(x))\n\nnot Textured(jerrie)\n\nHaired(jerrie) and forall x (Haired(x) -> Textured(x)) -> therefore Textured(jerrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Berchtold is not stung. Mechelle is lopsided. Ethelda is fungal. All lopsided things are archaistic. All archaistic things are womanlike. If something is archaistic and not fungal then it is not lopsided. All fungal things are lopsided. If Mechelle is archaistic then Mechelle is stung. All fungal, archaistic things are epizoan. Mechelle is womanlike.", "logic": "\nnot Stung(berchtold)\nLopsided(mechelle)\nFungal(ethelda)\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Archaistic(x))\nforall x (Archaistic(x) -> Womanlike(x))\nforall x (Archaistic(x) and not Fungal(x) -> not Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Fungal(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nArchaistic(mechelle) -> Stung(mechelle)\nforall x (Fungal(x) and Archaistic(x) -> Epizoan(x))\n\nWomanlike(mechelle)\n\nLopsided(mechelle) and forall x (Lopsided(x) -> Archaistic(x)) -> therefore Archaistic(mechelle) Archaistic(mechelle) and forall x (Archaistic(x) -> Womanlike(x)) -> therefore Womanlike(mechelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Cacilie is not elite. Marvin is fascistic. Ashby is bombproof. All fascistic things are browned. All browned things are waiting. If something is browned and not bombproof then it is not fascistic. All bombproof things are fascistic. If Marvin is browned then Marvin is elite. All bombproof, browned things are obovate. Marvin is not elite.", "logic": "\nnot Elite(cacilie)\nFascistic(marvin)\nBombproof(ashby)\nforall x (Fascistic(x) -> Browned(x))\nforall x (Browned(x) -> Waiting(x))\nforall x (Browned(x) and not Bombproof(x) -> not Fascistic(x))\nforall x (Bombproof(x) -> Fascistic(x))\nBrowned(marvin) -> Elite(marvin)\nforall x (Bombproof(x) and Browned(x) -> Obovate(x))\n\nnot Elite(marvin)\n\nFascistic(marvin) and forall x (Fascistic(x) -> Browned(x)) -> therefore Browned(marvin) Browned(marvin) and Browned(marvin) -> Elite(marvin) -> therefore Elite(marvin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Pail is not vindictive. Louisette is attempted. Herb is tympanic. All attempted things are biform. All biform things are expanded. If something is biform and not tympanic then it is not attempted. All tympanic things are attempted. If Louisette is biform then Louisette is vindictive. All tympanic, biform things are cordiform. Herb is expanded.", "logic": "\nnot Vindictive(pail)\nAttempted(louisette)\nTympanic(herb)\nforall x (Attempted(x) -> Biform(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Biform(x) and not Tympanic(x) -> not Attempted(x))\nforall x (Tympanic(x) -> Attempted(x))\nBiform(louisette) -> Vindictive(louisette)\nforall x (Tympanic(x) and Biform(x) -> Cordiform(x))\n\nExpanded(herb)\n\nTympanic(herb) and forall x (Tympanic(x) -> Attempted(x)) -> therefore Attempted(herb) Attempted(herb) and forall x (Attempted(x) -> Biform(x)) -> therefore Biform(herb) Biform(herb) and forall x (Biform(x) -> Expanded(x)) -> therefore Expanded(herb)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Dionne is not rhodesian. Berk is splotched. Philippa is rousseauan. All splotched things are infected. All infected things are terse. If something is infected and not rousseauan then it is not splotched. All rousseauan things are splotched. If Berk is infected then Berk is rhodesian. All rousseauan, infected things are memberless. Philippa is not memberless.", "logic": "\nnot Rhodesian(dionne)\nSplotched(berk)\nRousseauan(philippa)\nforall x (Splotched(x) -> Infected(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) -> Terse(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) and not Rousseauan(x) -> not Splotched(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Splotched(x))\nInfected(berk) -> Rhodesian(berk)\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) and Infected(x) -> Memberless(x))\n\nnot Memberless(philippa)\n\nRousseauan(philippa) and forall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Splotched(x)) -> therefore Splotched(philippa) Splotched(philippa) and forall x (Splotched(x) -> Infected(x)) -> therefore Infected(philippa) Rousseauan(philippa) and Infected(philippa) and forall x (Rousseauan(x) and Infected(x) -> Memberless(x)) -> therefore Memberless(philippa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Agathe is not nonhuman. Tore is vaccinated. Sherwin is unfixed. All vaccinated things are apiculate. All apiculate things are unctuous. If something is apiculate and not unfixed then it is not vaccinated. All unfixed things are vaccinated. If Tore is apiculate then Tore is nonhuman. All unfixed, apiculate things are meridian. Agathe is not unctuous.", "logic": "\nnot Nonhuman(agathe)\nVaccinated(tore)\nUnfixed(sherwin)\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Apiculate(x))\nforall x (Apiculate(x) -> Unctuous(x))\nforall x (Apiculate(x) and not Unfixed(x) -> not Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Unfixed(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nApiculate(tore) -> Nonhuman(tore)\nforall x (Unfixed(x) and Apiculate(x) -> Meridian(x))\n\nnot Unctuous(agathe)\n\nforall x (Apiculate(x) -> Unctuous(x)) <- forall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Apiculate(x)) <- forall x (Unfixed(x) -> Vaccinated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Tobit is not unheeding. Ignazio is whippy. Graehme is weeping. All whippy things are pilary. All pilary things are fiftieth. If something is pilary and not weeping then it is not whippy. All weeping things are whippy. If Ignazio is pilary then Ignazio is unheeding. All weeping, pilary things are isthmian. Tobit is whippy.", "logic": "\nnot Unheeding(tobit)\nWhippy(ignazio)\nWeeping(graehme)\nforall x (Whippy(x) -> Pilary(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) -> Fiftieth(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) and not Weeping(x) -> not Whippy(x))\nforall x (Weeping(x) -> Whippy(x))\nPilary(ignazio) -> Unheeding(ignazio)\nforall x (Weeping(x) and Pilary(x) -> Isthmian(x))\n\nWhippy(tobit)\n\nforall x (Weeping(x) -> Whippy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Sarina is not spiritous. Birgitta is laciniate. Aharon is probable. All laciniate things are motor. All motor things are whiplike. If something is motor and not probable then it is not laciniate. All probable things are laciniate. If Birgitta is motor then Birgitta is spiritous. All probable, motor things are tasty. Sarina is not motor.", "logic": "\nnot Spiritous(sarina)\nLaciniate(birgitta)\nProbable(aharon)\nforall x (Laciniate(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Motor(x) -> Whiplike(x))\nforall x (Motor(x) and not Probable(x) -> not Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Probable(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nMotor(birgitta) -> Spiritous(birgitta)\nforall x (Probable(x) and Motor(x) -> Tasty(x))\n\nnot Motor(sarina)\n\nforall x (Laciniate(x) -> Motor(x)) <- forall x (Probable(x) -> Laciniate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Iseabal is not tense. Dona is jittery. Chantalle is impolitic. All jittery things are unmanlike. All unmanlike things are pauline. If something is unmanlike and not impolitic then it is not jittery. All impolitic things are jittery. If Dona is unmanlike then Dona is tense. All impolitic, unmanlike things are noachian. Dona is noachian.", "logic": "\nnot Tense(iseabal)\nJittery(dona)\nImpolitic(chantalle)\nforall x (Jittery(x) -> Unmanlike(x))\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) -> Pauline(x))\nforall x (Unmanlike(x) and not Impolitic(x) -> not Jittery(x))\nforall x (Impolitic(x) -> Jittery(x))\nUnmanlike(dona) -> Tense(dona)\nforall x (Impolitic(x) and Unmanlike(x) -> Noachian(x))\n\nNoachian(dona)\n\nforall x (Impolitic(x) and Unmanlike(x) -> Noachian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Igor is not found. Bobby is custom. Kane is wooly. All custom things are unawakened. All unawakened things are remedial. If something is unawakened and not wooly then it is not custom. All wooly things are custom. If Bobby is unawakened then Bobby is found. All wooly, unawakened things are principled. Bobby is not green.", "logic": "\nnot Found(igor)\nCustom(bobby)\nWooly(kane)\nforall x (Custom(x) -> Unawakened(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Remedial(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) and not Wooly(x) -> not Custom(x))\nforall x (Wooly(x) -> Custom(x))\nUnawakened(bobby) -> Found(bobby)\nforall x (Wooly(x) and Unawakened(x) -> Principled(x))\n\nnot Green(bobby)\n\nnot Green(bobby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Shara is not literal. Pris is skillful. Bernhard is sellable. All skillful things are sanctioned. All sanctioned things are planetary. If something is sanctioned and not sellable then it is not skillful. All sellable things are skillful. If Pris is sanctioned then Pris is literal. All sellable, sanctioned things are hindermost. Shara is sellable.", "logic": "\nnot Literal(shara)\nSkillful(pris)\nSellable(bernhard)\nforall x (Skillful(x) -> Sanctioned(x))\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) -> Planetary(x))\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) and not Sellable(x) -> not Skillful(x))\nforall x (Sellable(x) -> Skillful(x))\nSanctioned(pris) -> Literal(pris)\nforall x (Sellable(x) and Sanctioned(x) -> Hindermost(x))\n\nSellable(shara)\n\nSellable(shara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Cherianne is not centesimal. Julio is fatherlike. Giovanna is inarguable. All fatherlike things are unmerciful. All unmerciful things are turgid. If something is unmerciful and not inarguable then it is not fatherlike. All inarguable things are fatherlike. If Julio is unmerciful then Julio is centesimal. All inarguable, unmerciful things are greenside. Julio is not inarguable.", "logic": "\nnot Centesimal(cherianne)\nFatherlike(julio)\nInarguable(giovanna)\nforall x (Fatherlike(x) -> Unmerciful(x))\nforall x (Unmerciful(x) -> Turgid(x))\nforall x (Unmerciful(x) and not Inarguable(x) -> not Fatherlike(x))\nforall x (Inarguable(x) -> Fatherlike(x))\nUnmerciful(julio) -> Centesimal(julio)\nforall x (Inarguable(x) and Unmerciful(x) -> Greenside(x))\n\nnot Inarguable(julio)\n\nnot Inarguable(julio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "Hedi is not harnessed. Donny is weepy. Ethel is flustered. All weepy things are parental. All parental things are uremic. If something is parental and not flustered then it is not weepy. All flustered things are weepy. If Donny is parental then Donny is harnessed. All flustered, parental things are graduate. Ethel is green.", "logic": "\nnot Harnessed(hedi)\nWeepy(donny)\nFlustered(ethel)\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> Parental(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Uremic(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) and not Flustered(x) -> not Weepy(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) -> Weepy(x))\nParental(donny) -> Harnessed(donny)\nforall x (Flustered(x) and Parental(x) -> Graduate(x))\n\nGreen(ethel)\n\nGreen(ethel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-647"} {"premises": "The eugen is terefah. The eugen is boneless. The eugen liberalize the philbert. The eugen does not see the philbert. The philbert does not eat the eugen. The philbert is terefah. The philbert is embroiled. The philbert is boneless. The philbert liberalize the eugen. The philbert spay the eugen. If something prance the philbert then the philbert does not see the eugen. If the philbert is boneless then the philbert spay the eugen. If something spay the philbert then the philbert prance the eugen. If the eugen liberalize the philbert and the philbert is not terefah then the philbert prance the eugen. All embroiled things are sedgelike. If the eugen does not see the philbert then the eugen liberalize the philbert. If something liberalize the philbert then it liberalize the eugen. If something liberalize the eugen then it liberalize the philbert. The philbert is boneless.", "logic": "\nTerefah(eugen)\nBoneless(eugen)\nLiberalize(eugen, philbert)\nnot Spay(eugen, philbert)\nnot Prance(philbert, eugen)\nTerefah(philbert)\nEmbroiled(philbert)\nBoneless(philbert)\nLiberalize(philbert, eugen)\nSpay(philbert, eugen)\nforall x (Prance(x, philbert) -> not Spay(philbert, eugen))\nBoneless(philbert) -> Spay(philbert, eugen)\nforall x (Spay(x, philbert) -> Prance(philbert, eugen))\nLiberalize(eugen, philbert) and not Terefah(philbert) -> Prance(philbert, eugen)\nforall x (Embroiled(x) -> Sedgelike(x))\nnot Spay(eugen, philbert) -> Liberalize(eugen, philbert)\nforall x (Liberalize(x, philbert) -> Liberalize(x, eugen))\nforall x (Liberalize(x, eugen) -> Liberalize(x, philbert))\n\nBoneless(philbert)\n\ntherefore Boneless(philbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2631"} {"premises": "The nero is twentieth. The nero is raunchy. The nero jounce the gavin. The nero does not see the gavin. The gavin does not eat the nero. The gavin is twentieth. The gavin is sagacious. The gavin is raunchy. The gavin jounce the nero. The gavin epoxy the nero. If something green the gavin then the gavin does not see the nero. If the gavin is raunchy then the gavin epoxy the nero. If something epoxy the gavin then the gavin green the nero. If the nero jounce the gavin and the gavin is not twentieth then the gavin green the nero. All sagacious things are mercurial. If the nero does not see the gavin then the nero jounce the gavin. If something jounce the gavin then it jounce the nero. If something jounce the nero then it jounce the gavin. The gavin green the nero.", "logic": "\nTwentieth(nero)\nRaunchy(nero)\nJounce(nero, gavin)\nnot Epoxy(nero, gavin)\nnot Green(gavin, nero)\nTwentieth(gavin)\nSagacious(gavin)\nRaunchy(gavin)\nJounce(gavin, nero)\nEpoxy(gavin, nero)\nforall x (Green(x, gavin) -> not Epoxy(gavin, nero))\nRaunchy(gavin) -> Epoxy(gavin, nero)\nforall x (Epoxy(x, gavin) -> Green(gavin, nero))\nJounce(nero, gavin) and not Twentieth(gavin) -> Green(gavin, nero)\nforall x (Sagacious(x) -> Mercurial(x))\nnot Epoxy(nero, gavin) -> Jounce(nero, gavin)\nforall x (Jounce(x, gavin) -> Jounce(x, nero))\nforall x (Jounce(x, nero) -> Jounce(x, gavin))\n\nGreen(gavin, nero)\n\ntherefore not Green(gavin, nero)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2631"} {"premises": "The grata is connatural. The grata is fiendish. The grata spiel the prentiss. The grata does not see the prentiss. The prentiss does not eat the grata. The prentiss is connatural. The prentiss is vincible. The prentiss is fiendish. The prentiss spiel the grata. The prentiss closure the grata. If something sniffle the prentiss then the prentiss does not see the grata. If the prentiss is fiendish then the prentiss closure the grata. If something closure the prentiss then the prentiss sniffle the grata. If the grata spiel the prentiss and the prentiss is not connatural then the prentiss sniffle the grata. All vincible things are clerical. If the grata does not see the prentiss then the grata spiel the prentiss. If something spiel the prentiss then it spiel the grata. If something spiel the grata then it spiel the prentiss. The grata is not clerical.", "logic": "\nConnatural(grata)\nFiendish(grata)\nSpiel(grata, prentiss)\nnot Closure(grata, prentiss)\nnot Sniffle(prentiss, grata)\nConnatural(prentiss)\nVincible(prentiss)\nFiendish(prentiss)\nSpiel(prentiss, grata)\nClosure(prentiss, grata)\nforall x (Sniffle(x, prentiss) -> not Closure(prentiss, grata))\nFiendish(prentiss) -> Closure(prentiss, grata)\nforall x (Closure(x, prentiss) -> Sniffle(prentiss, grata))\nSpiel(grata, prentiss) and not Connatural(prentiss) -> Sniffle(prentiss, grata)\nforall x (Vincible(x) -> Clerical(x))\nnot Closure(grata, prentiss) -> Spiel(grata, prentiss)\nforall x (Spiel(x, prentiss) -> Spiel(x, grata))\nforall x (Spiel(x, grata) -> Spiel(x, prentiss))\n\nnot Clerical(grata)\n\nforall x (Vincible(x) -> Clerical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2631"} {"premises": "The pepita is pouched. The pepita is anglican. The pepita palm the lory. The pepita does not see the lory. The lory does not eat the pepita. The lory is pouched. The lory is propellent. The lory is anglican. The lory palm the pepita. The lory apostatize the pepita. If something crisscross the lory then the lory does not see the pepita. If the lory is anglican then the lory apostatize the pepita. If something apostatize the lory then the lory crisscross the pepita. If the pepita palm the lory and the lory is not pouched then the lory crisscross the pepita. All propellent things are annulated. If the pepita does not see the lory then the pepita palm the lory. If something palm the lory then it palm the pepita. If something palm the pepita then it palm the lory. The lory apostatize the lory.", "logic": "\nPouched(pepita)\nAnglican(pepita)\nPalm(pepita, lory)\nnot Apostatize(pepita, lory)\nnot Crisscross(lory, pepita)\nPouched(lory)\nPropellent(lory)\nAnglican(lory)\nPalm(lory, pepita)\nApostatize(lory, pepita)\nforall x (Crisscross(x, lory) -> not Apostatize(lory, pepita))\nAnglican(lory) -> Apostatize(lory, pepita)\nforall x (Apostatize(x, lory) -> Crisscross(lory, pepita))\nPalm(pepita, lory) and not Pouched(lory) -> Crisscross(lory, pepita)\nforall x (Propellent(x) -> Annulated(x))\nnot Apostatize(pepita, lory) -> Palm(pepita, lory)\nforall x (Palm(x, lory) -> Palm(x, pepita))\nforall x (Palm(x, pepita) -> Palm(x, lory))\n\nApostatize(lory, lory)\n\nApostatize(lory, lory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2631"} {"premises": "The meridel is armlike. The larisa is stilted. The pattie deice the meridel. If someone is armlike then they need the larisa. If someone deice the meridel then they chase the meridel. If someone ghettoise the larisa and the larisa is stilted then the larisa is armlike. The larisa is stilted.", "logic": "\nArmlike(meridel)\nStilted(larisa)\nDeice(pattie, meridel)\nforall x (Armlike(x) -> Ghettoise(x, larisa))\nforall x (Deice(x, meridel) -> Ravel(x, meridel))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, larisa) and Stilted(larisa) -> Armlike(larisa))\n\nStilted(larisa)\n\ntherefore Stilted(larisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The mattias is dualistic. The deirdre is astomatous. The trista privilege the mattias. If someone is dualistic then they need the deirdre. If someone privilege the mattias then they chase the mattias. If someone decay the deirdre and the deirdre is astomatous then the deirdre is dualistic. The deirdre is not astomatous.", "logic": "\nDualistic(mattias)\nAstomatous(deirdre)\nPrivilege(trista, mattias)\nforall x (Dualistic(x) -> Decay(x, deirdre))\nforall x (Privilege(x, mattias) -> Plain(x, mattias))\nforall x (Decay(x, deirdre) and Astomatous(deirdre) -> Dualistic(deirdre))\n\nnot Astomatous(deirdre)\n\ntherefore Astomatous(deirdre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The erena is candied. The tiff is moderating. The fanny stale the erena. If someone is candied then they need the tiff. If someone stale the erena then they chase the erena. If someone drool the tiff and the tiff is moderating then the tiff is candied. The erena drool the tiff.", "logic": "\nCandied(erena)\nModerating(tiff)\nStale(fanny, erena)\nforall x (Candied(x) -> Drool(x, tiff))\nforall x (Stale(x, erena) -> Finance(x, erena))\nforall x (Drool(x, tiff) and Moderating(tiff) -> Candied(tiff))\n\nDrool(erena, tiff)\n\nCandied(erena) and forall x (Candied(x) -> Drool(x, tiff)) -> therefore Drool(erena, tiff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The etienne is guyanese. The melissa is nihilistic. The salome lose the etienne. If someone is guyanese then they need the melissa. If someone lose the etienne then they chase the etienne. If someone annoy the melissa and the melissa is nihilistic then the melissa is guyanese. The etienne does not need the melissa.", "logic": "\nGuyanese(etienne)\nNihilistic(melissa)\nLose(salome, etienne)\nforall x (Guyanese(x) -> Annoy(x, melissa))\nforall x (Lose(x, etienne) -> Demur(x, etienne))\nforall x (Annoy(x, melissa) and Nihilistic(melissa) -> Guyanese(melissa))\n\nnot Annoy(etienne, melissa)\n\nGuyanese(etienne) and forall x (Guyanese(x) -> Annoy(x, melissa)) -> therefore Annoy(etienne, melissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The kendall is determined. The leela is ischaemic. The kareem madder the kendall. If someone is determined then they need the leela. If someone madder the kendall then they chase the kendall. If someone unbend the leela and the leela is ischaemic then the leela is determined. The leela is determined.", "logic": "\nDetermined(kendall)\nIschaemic(leela)\nMadder(kareem, kendall)\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Unbend(x, leela))\nforall x (Madder(x, kendall) -> Gape(x, kendall))\nforall x (Unbend(x, leela) and Ischaemic(leela) -> Determined(leela))\n\nDetermined(leela)\n\nDetermined(kendall) and forall x (Determined(x) -> Unbend(x, leela)) -> therefore Unbend(kendall, leela) Unbend(kendall, leela) and Ischaemic(leela) and forall x (Unbend(x, leela) and Ischaemic(leela) -> Determined(leela)) -> therefore Determined(leela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The nina is african. The blinni is venous. The mylo lighter the nina. If someone is african then they need the blinni. If someone lighter the nina then they chase the nina. If someone dislike the blinni and the blinni is venous then the blinni is african. The blinni is not african.", "logic": "\nAfrican(nina)\nVenous(blinni)\nLighter(mylo, nina)\nforall x (African(x) -> Dislike(x, blinni))\nforall x (Lighter(x, nina) -> Breast(x, nina))\nforall x (Dislike(x, blinni) and Venous(blinni) -> African(blinni))\n\nnot African(blinni)\n\nAfrican(nina) and forall x (African(x) -> Dislike(x, blinni)) -> therefore Dislike(nina, blinni) Dislike(nina, blinni) and Venous(blinni) and forall x (Dislike(x, blinni) and Venous(blinni) -> African(blinni)) -> therefore African(blinni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The hall is then. The kameko is overland. The valli quibble the hall. If someone is then then they need the kameko. If someone quibble the hall then they chase the hall. If someone terrasse the kameko and the kameko is overland then the kameko is then. The kameko terrasse the kameko.", "logic": "\nThen(hall)\nOverland(kameko)\nQuibble(valli, hall)\nforall x (Then(x) -> Terrasse(x, kameko))\nforall x (Quibble(x, hall) -> Manipulate(x, hall))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, kameko) and Overland(kameko) -> Then(kameko))\n\nTerrasse(kameko, kameko)\n\nThen(hall) and forall x (Then(x) -> Terrasse(x, kameko)) -> therefore Terrasse(hall, kameko) Terrasse(hall, kameko) and Overland(kameko) and forall x (Terrasse(x, kameko) and Overland(kameko) -> Then(kameko)) -> therefore Then(kameko) Then(kameko) and forall x (Then(x) -> Terrasse(x, kameko)) -> therefore Terrasse(kameko, kameko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The edgardo is conclusive. The berte is willowy. The aamir illegalise the edgardo. If someone is conclusive then they need the berte. If someone illegalise the edgardo then they chase the edgardo. If someone backtrack the berte and the berte is willowy then the berte is conclusive. The berte does not need the berte.", "logic": "\nConclusive(edgardo)\nWillowy(berte)\nIllegalise(aamir, edgardo)\nforall x (Conclusive(x) -> Backtrack(x, berte))\nforall x (Illegalise(x, edgardo) -> Raise(x, edgardo))\nforall x (Backtrack(x, berte) and Willowy(berte) -> Conclusive(berte))\n\nnot Backtrack(berte, berte)\n\nConclusive(edgardo) and forall x (Conclusive(x) -> Backtrack(x, berte)) -> therefore Backtrack(edgardo, berte) Backtrack(edgardo, berte) and Willowy(berte) and forall x (Backtrack(x, berte) and Willowy(berte) -> Conclusive(berte)) -> therefore Conclusive(berte) Conclusive(berte) and forall x (Conclusive(x) -> Backtrack(x, berte)) -> therefore Backtrack(berte, berte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The shayla is corporal. The roanne is orderly. The tandi slalom the shayla. If someone is corporal then they need the roanne. If someone slalom the shayla then they chase the shayla. If someone overbear the roanne and the roanne is orderly then the roanne is corporal. The shayla does not chase the shayla.", "logic": "\nCorporal(shayla)\nOrderly(roanne)\nSlalom(tandi, shayla)\nforall x (Corporal(x) -> Overbear(x, roanne))\nforall x (Slalom(x, shayla) -> Appall(x, shayla))\nforall x (Overbear(x, roanne) and Orderly(roanne) -> Corporal(roanne))\n\nnot Appall(shayla, shayla)\n\nforall x (Slalom(x, shayla) -> Appall(x, shayla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The fabio is axial. The letty is uncovered. The valentin malign the fabio. If someone is axial then they need the letty. If someone malign the fabio then they chase the fabio. If someone still the letty and the letty is uncovered then the letty is axial. The valentin still the letty.", "logic": "\nAxial(fabio)\nUncovered(letty)\nMalign(valentin, fabio)\nforall x (Axial(x) -> Still(x, letty))\nforall x (Malign(x, fabio) -> Hush(x, fabio))\nforall x (Still(x, letty) and Uncovered(letty) -> Axial(letty))\n\nStill(valentin, letty)\n\nforall x (Axial(x) -> Still(x, letty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The nela is derelict. The canada is conjugated. The danielle rove the nela. If someone is derelict then they need the canada. If someone rove the nela then they chase the nela. If someone grave the canada and the canada is conjugated then the canada is derelict. The canada does not chase the nela.", "logic": "\nDerelict(nela)\nConjugated(canada)\nRove(danielle, nela)\nforall x (Derelict(x) -> Grave(x, canada))\nforall x (Rove(x, nela) -> Concertise(x, nela))\nforall x (Grave(x, canada) and Conjugated(canada) -> Derelict(canada))\n\nnot Concertise(canada, nela)\n\nforall x (Rove(x, nela) -> Concertise(x, nela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The margo is nonporous. The geo is heedful. The cherianne housebreak the margo. If someone is nonporous then they need the geo. If someone housebreak the margo then they chase the margo. If someone dabble the geo and the geo is heedful then the geo is nonporous. The geo is cold.", "logic": "\nNonporous(margo)\nHeedful(geo)\nHousebreak(cherianne, margo)\nforall x (Nonporous(x) -> Dabble(x, geo))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, margo) -> Botch(x, margo))\nforall x (Dabble(x, geo) and Heedful(geo) -> Nonporous(geo))\n\nCold(geo)\n\nCold(geo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The pansy is ghoulish. The filbert is ratable. The skylar fray the pansy. If someone is ghoulish then they need the filbert. If someone fray the pansy then they chase the pansy. If someone gripe the filbert and the filbert is ratable then the filbert is ghoulish. The pansy does not like the skylar.", "logic": "\nGhoulish(pansy)\nRatable(filbert)\nFray(skylar, pansy)\nforall x (Ghoulish(x) -> Gripe(x, filbert))\nforall x (Fray(x, pansy) -> Freeload(x, pansy))\nforall x (Gripe(x, filbert) and Ratable(filbert) -> Ghoulish(filbert))\n\nnot Fray(pansy, skylar)\n\nnot Fray(pansy, skylar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The nannie is larboard. The dino is tangled. The coralie spiral the nannie. If someone is larboard then they need the dino. If someone spiral the nannie then they chase the nannie. If someone specialize the dino and the dino is tangled then the dino is larboard. The coralie is blue.", "logic": "\nLarboard(nannie)\nTangled(dino)\nSpiral(coralie, nannie)\nforall x (Larboard(x) -> Specialize(x, dino))\nforall x (Spiral(x, nannie) -> Sham(x, nannie))\nforall x (Specialize(x, dino) and Tangled(dino) -> Larboard(dino))\n\nBlue(coralie)\n\nBlue(coralie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The marven is brief. The miran is earlyish. The gay snitch the marven. If someone is brief then they need the miran. If someone snitch the marven then they chase the marven. If someone disappear the miran and the miran is earlyish then the miran is brief. The miran is not kind.", "logic": "\nBrief(marven)\nEarlyish(miran)\nSnitch(gay, marven)\nforall x (Brief(x) -> Disappear(x, miran))\nforall x (Snitch(x, marven) -> Assume(x, marven))\nforall x (Disappear(x, miran) and Earlyish(miran) -> Brief(miran))\n\nnot Kind(miran)\n\nnot Kind(miran) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The mariele is stormproof. The vale is thriftless. The ollie potentiate the mariele. If someone is stormproof then they need the vale. If someone potentiate the mariele then they chase the mariele. If someone miniate the vale and the vale is thriftless then the vale is stormproof. The mariele beckon the ollie.", "logic": "\nStormproof(mariele)\nThriftless(vale)\nPotentiate(ollie, mariele)\nforall x (Stormproof(x) -> Miniate(x, vale))\nforall x (Potentiate(x, mariele) -> Beckon(x, mariele))\nforall x (Miniate(x, vale) and Thriftless(vale) -> Stormproof(vale))\n\nBeckon(mariele, ollie)\n\nBeckon(mariele, ollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-442"} {"premises": "The sherilyn feed the ivor. The sherilyn brachiate the ivor. The wright scrape the sherilyn. The barby is arduous. The ivor scrape the barby. The ivor feed the sherilyn. The ivor brachiate the barby. If someone brachiate the sherilyn then they are stubby. If someone scrape the sherilyn then they visit the barby. If someone brachiate the barby and they visit the ivor then they need the barby. If someone is stubby then they chase the wright. All mucosal, iberian people are stubby. If someone scrape the barby and they are civilised then they are arduous. If someone scrape the sherilyn and they visit the barby then the barby brachiate the sherilyn. If someone is arduous then they chase the ivor. The barby is arduous.", "logic": "\nFeed(sherilyn, ivor)\nBrachiate(sherilyn, ivor)\nScrape(wright, sherilyn)\nArduous(barby)\nScrape(ivor, barby)\nFeed(ivor, sherilyn)\nBrachiate(ivor, barby)\nforall x (Brachiate(x, sherilyn) -> Stubby(x))\nforall x (Scrape(x, sherilyn) -> Brachiate(x, barby))\nforall x (Brachiate(x, barby) and Brachiate(x, ivor) -> Feed(x, barby))\nforall x (Stubby(x) -> Scrape(x, wright))\nforall x (Mucosal(x) and Iberian(x) -> Stubby(x))\nforall x (Scrape(x, barby) and Civilised(x) -> Arduous(x))\nforall x (Scrape(x, sherilyn) and Brachiate(x, barby) -> Brachiate(barby, sherilyn))\nforall x (Arduous(x) -> Scrape(x, ivor))\n\nArduous(barby)\n\ntherefore Arduous(barby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The allene blackleg the jef. The allene hunch the jef. The annissa dibble the allene. The manda is coral. The jef dibble the manda. The jef blackleg the allene. The jef hunch the manda. If someone hunch the allene then they are cherubic. If someone dibble the allene then they visit the manda. If someone hunch the manda and they visit the jef then they need the manda. If someone is cherubic then they chase the annissa. All boneheaded, tangible people are cherubic. If someone dibble the manda and they are sonic then they are coral. If someone dibble the allene and they visit the manda then the manda hunch the allene. If someone is coral then they chase the jef. The manda is not coral.", "logic": "\nBlackleg(allene, jef)\nHunch(allene, jef)\nDibble(annissa, allene)\nCoral(manda)\nDibble(jef, manda)\nBlackleg(jef, allene)\nHunch(jef, manda)\nforall x (Hunch(x, allene) -> Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Dibble(x, allene) -> Hunch(x, manda))\nforall x (Hunch(x, manda) and Hunch(x, jef) -> Blackleg(x, manda))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) -> Dibble(x, annissa))\nforall x (Boneheaded(x) and Tangible(x) -> Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Dibble(x, manda) and Sonic(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Dibble(x, allene) and Hunch(x, manda) -> Hunch(manda, allene))\nforall x (Coral(x) -> Dibble(x, jef))\n\nnot Coral(manda)\n\ntherefore Coral(manda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The jillana exorcize the virginia. The jillana conga the virginia. The modestine prorate the jillana. The lauren is stylized. The virginia prorate the lauren. The virginia exorcize the jillana. The virginia conga the lauren. If someone conga the jillana then they are nutty. If someone prorate the jillana then they visit the lauren. If someone conga the lauren and they visit the virginia then they need the lauren. If someone is nutty then they chase the modestine. All culinary, twinning people are nutty. If someone prorate the lauren and they are nipping then they are stylized. If someone prorate the jillana and they visit the lauren then the lauren conga the jillana. If someone is stylized then they chase the virginia. The lauren prorate the virginia.", "logic": "\nExorcize(jillana, virginia)\nConga(jillana, virginia)\nProrate(modestine, jillana)\nStylized(lauren)\nProrate(virginia, lauren)\nExorcize(virginia, jillana)\nConga(virginia, lauren)\nforall x (Conga(x, jillana) -> Nutty(x))\nforall x (Prorate(x, jillana) -> Conga(x, lauren))\nforall x (Conga(x, lauren) and Conga(x, virginia) -> Exorcize(x, lauren))\nforall x (Nutty(x) -> Prorate(x, modestine))\nforall x (Culinary(x) and Twinning(x) -> Nutty(x))\nforall x (Prorate(x, lauren) and Nipping(x) -> Stylized(x))\nforall x (Prorate(x, jillana) and Conga(x, lauren) -> Conga(lauren, jillana))\nforall x (Stylized(x) -> Prorate(x, virginia))\n\nProrate(lauren, virginia)\n\nStylized(lauren) and forall x (Stylized(x) -> Prorate(x, virginia)) -> therefore Prorate(lauren, virginia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The annette miaou the maggy. The annette preclude the maggy. The sapphire subdue the annette. The tonnie is drear. The maggy subdue the tonnie. The maggy miaou the annette. The maggy preclude the tonnie. If someone preclude the annette then they are simplistic. If someone subdue the annette then they visit the tonnie. If someone preclude the tonnie and they visit the maggy then they need the tonnie. If someone is simplistic then they chase the sapphire. All coplanar, blameless people are simplistic. If someone subdue the tonnie and they are cocksure then they are drear. If someone subdue the annette and they visit the tonnie then the tonnie preclude the annette. If someone is drear then they chase the maggy. The tonnie does not chase the maggy.", "logic": "\nMiaou(annette, maggy)\nPreclude(annette, maggy)\nSubdue(sapphire, annette)\nDrear(tonnie)\nSubdue(maggy, tonnie)\nMiaou(maggy, annette)\nPreclude(maggy, tonnie)\nforall x (Preclude(x, annette) -> Simplistic(x))\nforall x (Subdue(x, annette) -> Preclude(x, tonnie))\nforall x (Preclude(x, tonnie) and Preclude(x, maggy) -> Miaou(x, tonnie))\nforall x (Simplistic(x) -> Subdue(x, sapphire))\nforall x (Coplanar(x) and Blameless(x) -> Simplistic(x))\nforall x (Subdue(x, tonnie) and Cocksure(x) -> Drear(x))\nforall x (Subdue(x, annette) and Preclude(x, tonnie) -> Preclude(tonnie, annette))\nforall x (Drear(x) -> Subdue(x, maggy))\n\nnot Subdue(tonnie, maggy)\n\nDrear(tonnie) and forall x (Drear(x) -> Subdue(x, maggy)) -> therefore Subdue(tonnie, maggy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The ailyn foment the maurita. The ailyn evanesce the maurita. The nils despond the ailyn. The barn is embolic. The maurita despond the barn. The maurita foment the ailyn. The maurita evanesce the barn. If someone evanesce the ailyn then they are hoary. If someone despond the ailyn then they visit the barn. If someone evanesce the barn and they visit the maurita then they need the barn. If someone is hoary then they chase the nils. All stative, owlish people are hoary. If someone despond the barn and they are rotatory then they are embolic. If someone despond the ailyn and they visit the barn then the barn evanesce the ailyn. If someone is embolic then they chase the maurita. The barn evanesce the ailyn.", "logic": "\nFoment(ailyn, maurita)\nEvanesce(ailyn, maurita)\nDespond(nils, ailyn)\nEmbolic(barn)\nDespond(maurita, barn)\nFoment(maurita, ailyn)\nEvanesce(maurita, barn)\nforall x (Evanesce(x, ailyn) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Despond(x, ailyn) -> Evanesce(x, barn))\nforall x (Evanesce(x, barn) and Evanesce(x, maurita) -> Foment(x, barn))\nforall x (Hoary(x) -> Despond(x, nils))\nforall x (Stative(x) and Owlish(x) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Despond(x, barn) and Rotatory(x) -> Embolic(x))\nforall x (Despond(x, ailyn) and Evanesce(x, barn) -> Evanesce(barn, ailyn))\nforall x (Embolic(x) -> Despond(x, maurita))\n\nEvanesce(barn, ailyn)\n\nDespond(nils, ailyn) and forall x (Despond(x, ailyn) -> Evanesce(x, barn)) -> therefore Evanesce(nils, barn) Despond(nils, ailyn) and Evanesce(nils, barn) and forall x (Despond(x, ailyn) and Evanesce(x, barn) -> Evanesce(barn, ailyn)) -> therefore Evanesce(barn, ailyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The marcello actualise the rheta. The marcello extinguish the rheta. The aaron foredate the marcello. The rutledge is parve. The rheta foredate the rutledge. The rheta actualise the marcello. The rheta extinguish the rutledge. If someone extinguish the marcello then they are presumable. If someone foredate the marcello then they visit the rutledge. If someone extinguish the rutledge and they visit the rheta then they need the rutledge. If someone is presumable then they chase the aaron. All undaunted, keeled people are presumable. If someone foredate the rutledge and they are anorthitic then they are parve. If someone foredate the marcello and they visit the rutledge then the rutledge extinguish the marcello. If someone is parve then they chase the rheta. The rutledge does not visit the marcello.", "logic": "\nActualise(marcello, rheta)\nExtinguish(marcello, rheta)\nForedate(aaron, marcello)\nParve(rutledge)\nForedate(rheta, rutledge)\nActualise(rheta, marcello)\nExtinguish(rheta, rutledge)\nforall x (Extinguish(x, marcello) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Foredate(x, marcello) -> Extinguish(x, rutledge))\nforall x (Extinguish(x, rutledge) and Extinguish(x, rheta) -> Actualise(x, rutledge))\nforall x (Presumable(x) -> Foredate(x, aaron))\nforall x (Undaunted(x) and Keeled(x) -> Presumable(x))\nforall x (Foredate(x, rutledge) and Anorthitic(x) -> Parve(x))\nforall x (Foredate(x, marcello) and Extinguish(x, rutledge) -> Extinguish(rutledge, marcello))\nforall x (Parve(x) -> Foredate(x, rheta))\n\nnot Extinguish(rutledge, marcello)\n\nForedate(aaron, marcello) and forall x (Foredate(x, marcello) -> Extinguish(x, rutledge)) -> therefore Extinguish(aaron, rutledge) Foredate(aaron, marcello) and Extinguish(aaron, rutledge) and forall x (Foredate(x, marcello) and Extinguish(x, rutledge) -> Extinguish(rutledge, marcello)) -> therefore Extinguish(rutledge, marcello)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The allina illegalise the ali. The allina labialise the ali. The francois practise the allina. The juan is hushed. The ali practise the juan. The ali illegalise the allina. The ali labialise the juan. If someone labialise the allina then they are permeating. If someone practise the allina then they visit the juan. If someone labialise the juan and they visit the ali then they need the juan. If someone is permeating then they chase the francois. All spirituous, dainty people are permeating. If someone practise the juan and they are away then they are hushed. If someone practise the allina and they visit the juan then the juan labialise the allina. If someone is hushed then they chase the ali. The juan is permeating.", "logic": "\nIllegalise(allina, ali)\nLabialise(allina, ali)\nPractise(francois, allina)\nHushed(juan)\nPractise(ali, juan)\nIllegalise(ali, allina)\nLabialise(ali, juan)\nforall x (Labialise(x, allina) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Practise(x, allina) -> Labialise(x, juan))\nforall x (Labialise(x, juan) and Labialise(x, ali) -> Illegalise(x, juan))\nforall x (Permeating(x) -> Practise(x, francois))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) and Dainty(x) -> Permeating(x))\nforall x (Practise(x, juan) and Away(x) -> Hushed(x))\nforall x (Practise(x, allina) and Labialise(x, juan) -> Labialise(juan, allina))\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Practise(x, ali))\n\nPermeating(juan)\n\nPractise(francois, allina) and forall x (Practise(x, allina) -> Labialise(x, juan)) -> therefore Labialise(francois, juan) Practise(francois, allina) and Labialise(francois, juan) and forall x (Practise(x, allina) and Labialise(x, juan) -> Labialise(juan, allina)) -> therefore Labialise(juan, allina) Labialise(juan, allina) and forall x (Labialise(x, allina) -> Permeating(x)) -> therefore Permeating(juan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The preston instruct the carolyn. The preston neuter the carolyn. The lynette keratinise the preston. The aurora is cutaneous. The carolyn keratinise the aurora. The carolyn instruct the preston. The carolyn neuter the aurora. If someone neuter the preston then they are agitating. If someone keratinise the preston then they visit the aurora. If someone neuter the aurora and they visit the carolyn then they need the aurora. If someone is agitating then they chase the lynette. All upwind, cathedral people are agitating. If someone keratinise the aurora and they are qatari then they are cutaneous. If someone keratinise the preston and they visit the aurora then the aurora neuter the preston. If someone is cutaneous then they chase the carolyn. The aurora is not agitating.", "logic": "\nInstruct(preston, carolyn)\nNeuter(preston, carolyn)\nKeratinise(lynette, preston)\nCutaneous(aurora)\nKeratinise(carolyn, aurora)\nInstruct(carolyn, preston)\nNeuter(carolyn, aurora)\nforall x (Neuter(x, preston) -> Agitating(x))\nforall x (Keratinise(x, preston) -> Neuter(x, aurora))\nforall x (Neuter(x, aurora) and Neuter(x, carolyn) -> Instruct(x, aurora))\nforall x (Agitating(x) -> Keratinise(x, lynette))\nforall x (Upwind(x) and Cathedral(x) -> Agitating(x))\nforall x (Keratinise(x, aurora) and Qatari(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nforall x (Keratinise(x, preston) and Neuter(x, aurora) -> Neuter(aurora, preston))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Keratinise(x, carolyn))\n\nnot Agitating(aurora)\n\nKeratinise(lynette, preston) and forall x (Keratinise(x, preston) -> Neuter(x, aurora)) -> therefore Neuter(lynette, aurora) Keratinise(lynette, preston) and Neuter(lynette, aurora) and forall x (Keratinise(x, preston) and Neuter(x, aurora) -> Neuter(aurora, preston)) -> therefore Neuter(aurora, preston) Neuter(aurora, preston) and forall x (Neuter(x, preston) -> Agitating(x)) -> therefore Agitating(aurora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The appolonia bench the kurtis. The appolonia weary the kurtis. The greggory plumb the appolonia. The lyndy is pure. The kurtis plumb the lyndy. The kurtis bench the appolonia. The kurtis weary the lyndy. If someone weary the appolonia then they are occidental. If someone plumb the appolonia then they visit the lyndy. If someone weary the lyndy and they visit the kurtis then they need the lyndy. If someone is occidental then they chase the greggory. All shameful, unlike people are occidental. If someone plumb the lyndy and they are clinking then they are pure. If someone plumb the appolonia and they visit the lyndy then the lyndy weary the appolonia. If someone is pure then they chase the kurtis. The appolonia does not visit the lyndy.", "logic": "\nBench(appolonia, kurtis)\nWeary(appolonia, kurtis)\nPlumb(greggory, appolonia)\nPure(lyndy)\nPlumb(kurtis, lyndy)\nBench(kurtis, appolonia)\nWeary(kurtis, lyndy)\nforall x (Weary(x, appolonia) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Plumb(x, appolonia) -> Weary(x, lyndy))\nforall x (Weary(x, lyndy) and Weary(x, kurtis) -> Bench(x, lyndy))\nforall x (Occidental(x) -> Plumb(x, greggory))\nforall x (Shameful(x) and Unlike(x) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Plumb(x, lyndy) and Clinking(x) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Plumb(x, appolonia) and Weary(x, lyndy) -> Weary(lyndy, appolonia))\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Plumb(x, kurtis))\n\nnot Weary(appolonia, lyndy)\n\nforall x (Plumb(x, appolonia) -> Weary(x, lyndy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The norris pocket the robinia. The norris pierce the robinia. The quint wane the norris. The amelie is nodular. The robinia wane the amelie. The robinia pocket the norris. The robinia pierce the amelie. If someone pierce the norris then they are combative. If someone wane the norris then they visit the amelie. If someone pierce the amelie and they visit the robinia then they need the amelie. If someone is combative then they chase the quint. All bootless, metal people are combative. If someone wane the amelie and they are unlipped then they are nodular. If someone wane the norris and they visit the amelie then the amelie pierce the norris. If someone is nodular then they chase the robinia. The norris pocket the amelie.", "logic": "\nPocket(norris, robinia)\nPierce(norris, robinia)\nWane(quint, norris)\nNodular(amelie)\nWane(robinia, amelie)\nPocket(robinia, norris)\nPierce(robinia, amelie)\nforall x (Pierce(x, norris) -> Combative(x))\nforall x (Wane(x, norris) -> Pierce(x, amelie))\nforall x (Pierce(x, amelie) and Pierce(x, robinia) -> Pocket(x, amelie))\nforall x (Combative(x) -> Wane(x, quint))\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Metal(x) -> Combative(x))\nforall x (Wane(x, amelie) and Unlipped(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Wane(x, norris) and Pierce(x, amelie) -> Pierce(amelie, norris))\nforall x (Nodular(x) -> Wane(x, robinia))\n\nPocket(norris, amelie)\n\nforall x (Pierce(x, amelie) and Pierce(x, robinia) -> Pocket(x, amelie)) <- forall x (Wane(x, norris) -> Pierce(x, amelie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The laurance stay the dorene. The laurance underspend the dorene. The vivyanne delude the laurance. The britney is cognitive. The dorene delude the britney. The dorene stay the laurance. The dorene underspend the britney. If someone underspend the laurance then they are fivefold. If someone delude the laurance then they visit the britney. If someone underspend the britney and they visit the dorene then they need the britney. If someone is fivefold then they chase the vivyanne. All expired, nonsexual people are fivefold. If someone delude the britney and they are grooved then they are cognitive. If someone delude the laurance and they visit the britney then the britney underspend the laurance. If someone is cognitive then they chase the dorene. The dorene does not need the britney.", "logic": "\nStay(laurance, dorene)\nUnderspend(laurance, dorene)\nDelude(vivyanne, laurance)\nCognitive(britney)\nDelude(dorene, britney)\nStay(dorene, laurance)\nUnderspend(dorene, britney)\nforall x (Underspend(x, laurance) -> Fivefold(x))\nforall x (Delude(x, laurance) -> Underspend(x, britney))\nforall x (Underspend(x, britney) and Underspend(x, dorene) -> Stay(x, britney))\nforall x (Fivefold(x) -> Delude(x, vivyanne))\nforall x (Expired(x) and Nonsexual(x) -> Fivefold(x))\nforall x (Delude(x, britney) and Grooved(x) -> Cognitive(x))\nforall x (Delude(x, laurance) and Underspend(x, britney) -> Underspend(britney, laurance))\nforall x (Cognitive(x) -> Delude(x, dorene))\n\nnot Stay(dorene, britney)\n\nforall x (Underspend(x, britney) and Underspend(x, dorene) -> Stay(x, britney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The amaleta wring the daryl. The amaleta thank the daryl. The orazio scrounge the amaleta. The dabney is pelagic. The daryl scrounge the dabney. The daryl wring the amaleta. The daryl thank the dabney. If someone thank the amaleta then they are burned. If someone scrounge the amaleta then they visit the dabney. If someone thank the dabney and they visit the daryl then they need the dabney. If someone is burned then they chase the orazio. All gleeful, sunlit people are burned. If someone scrounge the dabney and they are political then they are pelagic. If someone scrounge the amaleta and they visit the dabney then the dabney thank the amaleta. If someone is pelagic then they chase the daryl. The orazio is burned.", "logic": "\nWring(amaleta, daryl)\nThank(amaleta, daryl)\nScrounge(orazio, amaleta)\nPelagic(dabney)\nScrounge(daryl, dabney)\nWring(daryl, amaleta)\nThank(daryl, dabney)\nforall x (Thank(x, amaleta) -> Burned(x))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, amaleta) -> Thank(x, dabney))\nforall x (Thank(x, dabney) and Thank(x, daryl) -> Wring(x, dabney))\nforall x (Burned(x) -> Scrounge(x, orazio))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) and Sunlit(x) -> Burned(x))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, dabney) and Political(x) -> Pelagic(x))\nforall x (Scrounge(x, amaleta) and Thank(x, dabney) -> Thank(dabney, amaleta))\nforall x (Pelagic(x) -> Scrounge(x, daryl))\n\nBurned(orazio)\n\nforall x (Thank(x, amaleta) -> Burned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The pat fettle the sunshine. The pat bestow the sunshine. The sonnnie stumble the pat. The emmaline is prenominal. The sunshine stumble the emmaline. The sunshine fettle the pat. The sunshine bestow the emmaline. If someone bestow the pat then they are defined. If someone stumble the pat then they visit the emmaline. If someone bestow the emmaline and they visit the sunshine then they need the emmaline. If someone is defined then they chase the sonnnie. All avellan, saute people are defined. If someone stumble the emmaline and they are abroad then they are prenominal. If someone stumble the pat and they visit the emmaline then the emmaline bestow the pat. If someone is prenominal then they chase the sunshine. The emmaline does not need the pat.", "logic": "\nFettle(pat, sunshine)\nBestow(pat, sunshine)\nStumble(sonnnie, pat)\nPrenominal(emmaline)\nStumble(sunshine, emmaline)\nFettle(sunshine, pat)\nBestow(sunshine, emmaline)\nforall x (Bestow(x, pat) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Stumble(x, pat) -> Bestow(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Bestow(x, emmaline) and Bestow(x, sunshine) -> Fettle(x, emmaline))\nforall x (Defined(x) -> Stumble(x, sonnnie))\nforall x (Avellan(x) and Saute(x) -> Defined(x))\nforall x (Stumble(x, emmaline) and Abroad(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Stumble(x, pat) and Bestow(x, emmaline) -> Bestow(emmaline, pat))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Stumble(x, sunshine))\n\nnot Fettle(emmaline, pat)\n\nnot Fettle(emmaline, pat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The pascale exacerbate the christina. The pascale quintuple the christina. The tabby proofread the pascale. The merill is enamored. The christina proofread the merill. The christina exacerbate the pascale. The christina quintuple the merill. If someone quintuple the pascale then they are freehanded. If someone proofread the pascale then they visit the merill. If someone quintuple the merill and they visit the christina then they need the merill. If someone is freehanded then they chase the tabby. All aroused, indentured people are freehanded. If someone proofread the merill and they are hearable then they are enamored. If someone proofread the pascale and they visit the merill then the merill quintuple the pascale. If someone is enamored then they chase the christina. The pascale proofread the merill.", "logic": "\nExacerbate(pascale, christina)\nQuintuple(pascale, christina)\nProofread(tabby, pascale)\nEnamored(merill)\nProofread(christina, merill)\nExacerbate(christina, pascale)\nQuintuple(christina, merill)\nforall x (Quintuple(x, pascale) -> Freehanded(x))\nforall x (Proofread(x, pascale) -> Quintuple(x, merill))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, merill) and Quintuple(x, christina) -> Exacerbate(x, merill))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> Proofread(x, tabby))\nforall x (Aroused(x) and Indentured(x) -> Freehanded(x))\nforall x (Proofread(x, merill) and Hearable(x) -> Enamored(x))\nforall x (Proofread(x, pascale) and Quintuple(x, merill) -> Quintuple(merill, pascale))\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> Proofread(x, christina))\n\nProofread(pascale, merill)\n\nProofread(pascale, merill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The caroleen tone the mirilla. The caroleen strop the mirilla. The quent master the caroleen. The roslyn is commensal. The mirilla master the roslyn. The mirilla tone the caroleen. The mirilla strop the roslyn. If someone strop the caroleen then they are orphic. If someone master the caroleen then they visit the roslyn. If someone strop the roslyn and they visit the mirilla then they need the roslyn. If someone is orphic then they chase the quent. All eugenic, chantlike people are orphic. If someone master the roslyn and they are combinable then they are commensal. If someone master the caroleen and they visit the roslyn then the roslyn strop the caroleen. If someone is commensal then they chase the mirilla. The mirilla does not chase the caroleen.", "logic": "\nTone(caroleen, mirilla)\nStrop(caroleen, mirilla)\nMaster(quent, caroleen)\nCommensal(roslyn)\nMaster(mirilla, roslyn)\nTone(mirilla, caroleen)\nStrop(mirilla, roslyn)\nforall x (Strop(x, caroleen) -> Orphic(x))\nforall x (Master(x, caroleen) -> Strop(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Strop(x, roslyn) and Strop(x, mirilla) -> Tone(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Orphic(x) -> Master(x, quent))\nforall x (Eugenic(x) and Chantlike(x) -> Orphic(x))\nforall x (Master(x, roslyn) and Combinable(x) -> Commensal(x))\nforall x (Master(x, caroleen) and Strop(x, roslyn) -> Strop(roslyn, caroleen))\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Master(x, mirilla))\n\nnot Master(mirilla, caroleen)\n\nnot Master(mirilla, caroleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "The logan overtire the emyle. The logan account the emyle. The sandie predicate the logan. The obie is antitumour. The emyle predicate the obie. The emyle overtire the logan. The emyle account the obie. If someone account the logan then they are detached. If someone predicate the logan then they visit the obie. If someone account the obie and they visit the emyle then they need the obie. If someone is detached then they chase the sandie. All iambic, inexpiable people are detached. If someone predicate the obie and they are elect then they are antitumour. If someone predicate the logan and they visit the obie then the obie account the logan. If someone is antitumour then they chase the emyle. The logan predicate the logan.", "logic": "\nOvertire(logan, emyle)\nAccount(logan, emyle)\nPredicate(sandie, logan)\nAntitumour(obie)\nPredicate(emyle, obie)\nOvertire(emyle, logan)\nAccount(emyle, obie)\nforall x (Account(x, logan) -> Detached(x))\nforall x (Predicate(x, logan) -> Account(x, obie))\nforall x (Account(x, obie) and Account(x, emyle) -> Overtire(x, obie))\nforall x (Detached(x) -> Predicate(x, sandie))\nforall x (Iambic(x) and Inexpiable(x) -> Detached(x))\nforall x (Predicate(x, obie) and Elect(x) -> Antitumour(x))\nforall x (Predicate(x, logan) and Account(x, obie) -> Account(obie, logan))\nforall x (Antitumour(x) -> Predicate(x, emyle))\n\nPredicate(logan, logan)\n\nPredicate(logan, logan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1610"} {"premises": "Amaleta is uncousinly. Amalle is ridiculous. If someone is uncousinly and short then they are ridiculous. If someone is heartless then they are clausal. If someone is ridiculous then they are uncousinly. If someone is uncousinly then they are short. If someone is short and uncousinly then they are listed. Kind, clausal people are ridiculous. Amalle is ridiculous.", "logic": "\nUncousinly(amaleta)\nRidiculous(amalle)\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) and Short(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\nforall x (Heartless(x) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Ridiculous(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) -> Short(x))\nforall x (Short(x) and Uncousinly(x) -> Listed(x))\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) and Clausal(x) -> Ridiculous(x))\n\nRidiculous(amalle)\n\ntherefore Ridiculous(amalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Gus is announced. Grove is perdurable. If someone is announced and invalid then they are perdurable. If someone is crabbed then they are zimbabwean. If someone is perdurable then they are announced. If someone is announced then they are invalid. If someone is invalid and announced then they are taunting. Kind, zimbabwean people are perdurable. Grove is not perdurable.", "logic": "\nAnnounced(gus)\nPerdurable(grove)\nforall x (Announced(x) and Invalid(x) -> Perdurable(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Zimbabwean(x))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) -> Announced(x))\nforall x (Announced(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Announced(x) -> Taunting(x))\nforall x (Announced(x) and Zimbabwean(x) -> Perdurable(x))\n\nnot Perdurable(grove)\n\ntherefore Perdurable(grove)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Rod is junoesque. Loreen is despoiled. If someone is junoesque and frayed then they are despoiled. If someone is damask then they are endogenic. If someone is despoiled then they are junoesque. If someone is junoesque then they are frayed. If someone is frayed and junoesque then they are delectable. Kind, endogenic people are despoiled. Loreen is junoesque.", "logic": "\nJunoesque(rod)\nDespoiled(loreen)\nforall x (Junoesque(x) and Frayed(x) -> Despoiled(x))\nforall x (Damask(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Despoiled(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Frayed(x))\nforall x (Frayed(x) and Junoesque(x) -> Delectable(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) and Endogenic(x) -> Despoiled(x))\n\nJunoesque(loreen)\n\nDespoiled(loreen) and forall x (Despoiled(x) -> Junoesque(x)) -> therefore Junoesque(loreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Ave is winsome. Auberta is unheeding. If someone is winsome and anatomical then they are unheeding. If someone is designed then they are fevered. If someone is unheeding then they are winsome. If someone is winsome then they are anatomical. If someone is anatomical and winsome then they are faustian. Kind, fevered people are unheeding. Ave is not anatomical.", "logic": "\nWinsome(ave)\nUnheeding(auberta)\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Anatomical(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Designed(x) -> Fevered(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) -> Winsome(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) -> Anatomical(x))\nforall x (Anatomical(x) and Winsome(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Fevered(x) -> Unheeding(x))\n\nnot Anatomical(ave)\n\nWinsome(ave) and forall x (Winsome(x) -> Anatomical(x)) -> therefore Anatomical(ave)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Ransell is static. Rhoda is rhyming. If someone is static and motherlike then they are rhyming. If someone is lxxvi then they are spangled. If someone is rhyming then they are static. If someone is static then they are motherlike. If someone is motherlike and static then they are painted. Kind, spangled people are rhyming. Ransell is rhyming.", "logic": "\nStatic(ransell)\nRhyming(rhoda)\nforall x (Static(x) and Motherlike(x) -> Rhyming(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Spangled(x))\nforall x (Rhyming(x) -> Static(x))\nforall x (Static(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and Static(x) -> Painted(x))\nforall x (Static(x) and Spangled(x) -> Rhyming(x))\n\nRhyming(ransell)\n\nStatic(ransell) and forall x (Static(x) -> Motherlike(x)) -> therefore Motherlike(ransell) Static(ransell) and Motherlike(ransell) and forall x (Static(x) and Motherlike(x) -> Rhyming(x)) -> therefore Rhyming(ransell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Giuseppe is flemish. Harmonia is colourful. If someone is flemish and pent then they are colourful. If someone is scrub then they are curving. If someone is colourful then they are flemish. If someone is flemish then they are pent. If someone is pent and flemish then they are authorial. Kind, curving people are colourful. Harmonia is not pent.", "logic": "\nFlemish(giuseppe)\nColourful(harmonia)\nforall x (Flemish(x) and Pent(x) -> Colourful(x))\nforall x (Scrub(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Colourful(x) -> Flemish(x))\nforall x (Flemish(x) -> Pent(x))\nforall x (Pent(x) and Flemish(x) -> Authorial(x))\nforall x (Flemish(x) and Curving(x) -> Colourful(x))\n\nnot Pent(harmonia)\n\nColourful(harmonia) and forall x (Colourful(x) -> Flemish(x)) -> therefore Flemish(harmonia) Flemish(harmonia) and forall x (Flemish(x) -> Pent(x)) -> therefore Pent(harmonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Jolyn is indelible. Fred is especial. If someone is indelible and malleable then they are especial. If someone is romaic then they are bragging. If someone is especial then they are indelible. If someone is indelible then they are malleable. If someone is malleable and indelible then they are excess. Kind, bragging people are especial. Fred is excess.", "logic": "\nIndelible(jolyn)\nEspecial(fred)\nforall x (Indelible(x) and Malleable(x) -> Especial(x))\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> Bragging(x))\nforall x (Especial(x) -> Indelible(x))\nforall x (Indelible(x) -> Malleable(x))\nforall x (Malleable(x) and Indelible(x) -> Excess(x))\nforall x (Indelible(x) and Bragging(x) -> Especial(x))\n\nExcess(fred)\n\nEspecial(fred) and forall x (Especial(x) -> Indelible(x)) -> therefore Indelible(fred) Indelible(fred) and forall x (Indelible(x) -> Malleable(x)) -> therefore Malleable(fred) Especial(fred) and forall x (Especial(x) -> Indelible(x)) -> therefore Indelible(fred) Malleable(fred) and Indelible(fred) and forall x (Malleable(x) and Indelible(x) -> Excess(x)) -> therefore Excess(fred)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Woodie is lxxvi. Maddy is antithetic. If someone is lxxvi and enigmatic then they are antithetic. If someone is orchestral then they are deciding. If someone is antithetic then they are lxxvi. If someone is lxxvi then they are enigmatic. If someone is enigmatic and lxxvi then they are windy. Kind, deciding people are antithetic. Maddy is not windy.", "logic": "\nLxxvi(woodie)\nAntithetic(maddy)\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) and Enigmatic(x) -> Antithetic(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Antithetic(x) -> Lxxvi(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Enigmatic(x))\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) and Lxxvi(x) -> Windy(x))\nforall x (Lxxvi(x) and Deciding(x) -> Antithetic(x))\n\nnot Windy(maddy)\n\nAntithetic(maddy) and forall x (Antithetic(x) -> Lxxvi(x)) -> therefore Lxxvi(maddy) Lxxvi(maddy) and forall x (Lxxvi(x) -> Enigmatic(x)) -> therefore Enigmatic(maddy) Antithetic(maddy) and forall x (Antithetic(x) -> Lxxvi(x)) -> therefore Lxxvi(maddy) Enigmatic(maddy) and Lxxvi(maddy) and forall x (Enigmatic(x) and Lxxvi(x) -> Windy(x)) -> therefore Windy(maddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Angelika is epiphyseal. Kessia is effulgent. If someone is epiphyseal and calibrated then they are effulgent. If someone is autarkic then they are slashed. If someone is effulgent then they are epiphyseal. If someone is epiphyseal then they are calibrated. If someone is calibrated and epiphyseal then they are impugnable. Kind, slashed people are effulgent. Kessia is not slashed.", "logic": "\nEpiphyseal(angelika)\nEffulgent(kessia)\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) and Calibrated(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Autarkic(x) -> Slashed(x))\nforall x (Effulgent(x) -> Epiphyseal(x))\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Calibrated(x))\nforall x (Calibrated(x) and Epiphyseal(x) -> Impugnable(x))\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) and Slashed(x) -> Effulgent(x))\n\nnot Slashed(kessia)\n\nforall x (Autarkic(x) -> Slashed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Clarey is voiceless. Claudie is cognizable. If someone is voiceless and decorous then they are cognizable. If someone is incapable then they are unlikeable. If someone is cognizable then they are voiceless. If someone is voiceless then they are decorous. If someone is decorous and voiceless then they are divergent. Kind, unlikeable people are cognizable. Clarey is unlikeable.", "logic": "\nVoiceless(clarey)\nCognizable(claudie)\nforall x (Voiceless(x) and Decorous(x) -> Cognizable(x))\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Unlikeable(x))\nforall x (Cognizable(x) -> Voiceless(x))\nforall x (Voiceless(x) -> Decorous(x))\nforall x (Decorous(x) and Voiceless(x) -> Divergent(x))\nforall x (Voiceless(x) and Unlikeable(x) -> Cognizable(x))\n\nUnlikeable(clarey)\n\nforall x (Incapable(x) -> Unlikeable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Gabriello is sacrosanct. Deeanne is prissy. If someone is sacrosanct and unfirm then they are prissy. If someone is doltish then they are copious. If someone is prissy then they are sacrosanct. If someone is sacrosanct then they are unfirm. If someone is unfirm and sacrosanct then they are namibian. Kind, copious people are prissy. Gabriello is not doltish.", "logic": "\nSacrosanct(gabriello)\nPrissy(deeanne)\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Unfirm(x) -> Prissy(x))\nforall x (Doltish(x) -> Copious(x))\nforall x (Prissy(x) -> Sacrosanct(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Unfirm(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Sacrosanct(x) -> Namibian(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) and Copious(x) -> Prissy(x))\n\nnot Doltish(gabriello)\n\nnot Doltish(gabriello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Madlin is caliginous. Mirelle is rebellious. If someone is caliginous and natty then they are rebellious. If someone is reflecting then they are kittenish. If someone is rebellious then they are caliginous. If someone is caliginous then they are natty. If someone is natty and caliginous then they are surmounted. Kind, kittenish people are rebellious. Mirelle is cold.", "logic": "\nCaliginous(madlin)\nRebellious(mirelle)\nforall x (Caliginous(x) and Natty(x) -> Rebellious(x))\nforall x (Reflecting(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Rebellious(x) -> Caliginous(x))\nforall x (Caliginous(x) -> Natty(x))\nforall x (Natty(x) and Caliginous(x) -> Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Caliginous(x) and Kittenish(x) -> Rebellious(x))\n\nCold(mirelle)\n\nCold(mirelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Zarla is muddled. Hollyanne is deathlike. If someone is muddled and flawed then they are deathlike. If someone is unassisted then they are comfy. If someone is deathlike then they are muddled. If someone is muddled then they are flawed. If someone is flawed and muddled then they are floored. Kind, comfy people are deathlike. Zarla is not cold.", "logic": "\nMuddled(zarla)\nDeathlike(hollyanne)\nforall x (Muddled(x) and Flawed(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Unassisted(x) -> Comfy(x))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) -> Flawed(x))\nforall x (Flawed(x) and Muddled(x) -> Floored(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) and Comfy(x) -> Deathlike(x))\n\nnot Cold(zarla)\n\nnot Cold(zarla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Merridie is allegro. Urbano is rosaceous. If someone is allegro and supportive then they are rosaceous. If someone is felicitous then they are gravid. If someone is rosaceous then they are allegro. If someone is allegro then they are supportive. If someone is supportive and allegro then they are prevalent. Kind, gravid people are rosaceous. Urbano is felicitous.", "logic": "\nAllegro(merridie)\nRosaceous(urbano)\nforall x (Allegro(x) and Supportive(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\nforall x (Felicitous(x) -> Gravid(x))\nforall x (Rosaceous(x) -> Allegro(x))\nforall x (Allegro(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) and Allegro(x) -> Prevalent(x))\nforall x (Allegro(x) and Gravid(x) -> Rosaceous(x))\n\nFelicitous(urbano)\n\nFelicitous(urbano) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-817"} {"premises": "Pavla is equipotent. Pavla is unpurified. Pavla is cryogenic. Pavla is draped. Pavla is burnt. Auguste is brindled. Auguste is equipotent. Auguste is unpurified. Auguste is blushful. Auguste is cryogenic. Auguste is draped. Auguste is burnt. If Pavla is cryogenic then Pavla is burnt. Auguste is unpurified.", "logic": "\nEquipotent(pavla)\nUnpurified(pavla)\nCryogenic(pavla)\nDraped(pavla)\nBurnt(pavla)\nBrindled(auguste)\nEquipotent(auguste)\nUnpurified(auguste)\nBlushful(auguste)\nCryogenic(auguste)\nDraped(auguste)\nBurnt(auguste)\nCryogenic(pavla) -> Burnt(pavla)\n\nUnpurified(auguste)\n\ntherefore Unpurified(auguste)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-998"} {"premises": "Margurite is accessible. Margurite is camp. Margurite is reefy. Margurite is chechen. Margurite is crumpled. Candide is liverish. Candide is accessible. Candide is camp. Candide is brimfull. Candide is reefy. Candide is chechen. Candide is crumpled. If Margurite is reefy then Margurite is crumpled. Candide is not brimfull.", "logic": "\nAccessible(margurite)\nCamp(margurite)\nReefy(margurite)\nChechen(margurite)\nCrumpled(margurite)\nLiverish(candide)\nAccessible(candide)\nCamp(candide)\nBrimfull(candide)\nReefy(candide)\nChechen(candide)\nCrumpled(candide)\nReefy(margurite) -> Crumpled(margurite)\n\nnot Brimfull(candide)\n\ntherefore Brimfull(candide)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-998"} {"premises": "Adey is lancinate. Adey is ammino. Adey is celtic. Adey is unhappy. Adey is ictic. Esmeralda is anuretic. Esmeralda is lancinate. Esmeralda is ammino. Esmeralda is stonelike. Esmeralda is celtic. Esmeralda is unhappy. Esmeralda is ictic. If Adey is celtic then Adey is ictic. Adey is not stonelike.", "logic": "\nLancinate(adey)\nAmmino(adey)\nCeltic(adey)\nUnhappy(adey)\nIctic(adey)\nAnuretic(esmeralda)\nLancinate(esmeralda)\nAmmino(esmeralda)\nStonelike(esmeralda)\nCeltic(esmeralda)\nUnhappy(esmeralda)\nIctic(esmeralda)\nCeltic(adey) -> Ictic(adey)\n\nnot Stonelike(adey)\n\nnot Stonelike(adey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-998"} {"premises": "Travers is phrasal. Travers is variegated. Travers is pinstriped. Travers is uterine. Travers is buckshee. Klara is toadyish. Klara is phrasal. Klara is variegated. Klara is copulative. Klara is pinstriped. Klara is uterine. Klara is buckshee. If Travers is pinstriped then Travers is buckshee. Travers is toadyish.", "logic": "\nPhrasal(travers)\nVariegated(travers)\nPinstriped(travers)\nUterine(travers)\nBuckshee(travers)\nToadyish(klara)\nPhrasal(klara)\nVariegated(klara)\nCopulative(klara)\nPinstriped(klara)\nUterine(klara)\nBuckshee(klara)\nPinstriped(travers) -> Buckshee(travers)\n\nToadyish(travers)\n\nToadyish(travers) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-998"} {"premises": "The apollo is not governable. The apollo verdigris the albert. The patin verdigris the apollo. The melva is sensitized. The melva humanize the patin. The melva verdigris the apollo. The melva verdigris the albert. The albert uncase the patin. The albert uncase the melva. The albert is useful. If something is prudential then it uncase the apollo. If something verdigris the apollo then the apollo is prudential. If something uncase the apollo then the apollo does not visit the patin. If something verdigris the patin then it is prudential. If something is sensitized and it verdigris the patin then it humanize the apollo. If something is prudential and it does not chase the melva then it uncase the albert. If something verdigris the albert and it humanize the apollo then it does not like the melva. If something is prudential and it does not like the apollo then it is ammoniac. The patin verdigris the apollo.", "logic": "\nnot Governable(apollo)\nVerdigris(apollo, albert)\nVerdigris(patin, apollo)\nSensitized(melva)\nHumanize(melva, patin)\nVerdigris(melva, apollo)\nVerdigris(melva, albert)\nUncase(albert, patin)\nUncase(albert, melva)\nUseful(albert)\nforall x (Prudential(x) -> Uncase(x, apollo))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, apollo) -> Prudential(apollo))\nforall x (Uncase(x, apollo) -> not Verdigris(apollo, patin))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, patin) -> Prudential(x))\nforall x (Sensitized(x) and Verdigris(x, patin) -> Humanize(x, apollo))\nforall x (Prudential(x) and not Uncase(x, melva) -> Uncase(x, albert))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, albert) and Humanize(x, apollo) -> not Humanize(x, melva))\nforall x (Prudential(x) and not Humanize(x, apollo) -> Ammoniac(x))\n\nVerdigris(patin, apollo)\n\ntherefore Verdigris(patin, apollo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The wilone is not factitious. The wilone abscise the rowe. The giavani abscise the wilone. The ira is unofficial. The ira freak the giavani. The ira abscise the wilone. The ira abscise the rowe. The rowe thrill the giavani. The rowe thrill the ira. The rowe is german. If something is acetabular then it thrill the wilone. If something abscise the wilone then the wilone is acetabular. If something thrill the wilone then the wilone does not visit the giavani. If something abscise the giavani then it is acetabular. If something is unofficial and it abscise the giavani then it freak the wilone. If something is acetabular and it does not chase the ira then it thrill the rowe. If something abscise the rowe and it freak the wilone then it does not like the ira. If something is acetabular and it does not like the wilone then it is abstruse. The ira does not like the giavani.", "logic": "\nnot Factitious(wilone)\nAbscise(wilone, rowe)\nAbscise(giavani, wilone)\nUnofficial(ira)\nFreak(ira, giavani)\nAbscise(ira, wilone)\nAbscise(ira, rowe)\nThrill(rowe, giavani)\nThrill(rowe, ira)\nGerman(rowe)\nforall x (Acetabular(x) -> Thrill(x, wilone))\nforall x (Abscise(x, wilone) -> Acetabular(wilone))\nforall x (Thrill(x, wilone) -> not Abscise(wilone, giavani))\nforall x (Abscise(x, giavani) -> Acetabular(x))\nforall x (Unofficial(x) and Abscise(x, giavani) -> Freak(x, wilone))\nforall x (Acetabular(x) and not Thrill(x, ira) -> Thrill(x, rowe))\nforall x (Abscise(x, rowe) and Freak(x, wilone) -> not Freak(x, ira))\nforall x (Acetabular(x) and not Freak(x, wilone) -> Abstruse(x))\n\nnot Freak(ira, giavani)\n\ntherefore Freak(ira, giavani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The athena is not nosed. The athena dogmatise the dyana. The kenn dogmatise the athena. The enrica is cuticular. The enrica plank the kenn. The enrica dogmatise the athena. The enrica dogmatise the dyana. The dyana scalp the kenn. The dyana scalp the enrica. The dyana is exaugural. If something is dysplastic then it scalp the athena. If something dogmatise the athena then the athena is dysplastic. If something scalp the athena then the athena does not visit the kenn. If something dogmatise the kenn then it is dysplastic. If something is cuticular and it dogmatise the kenn then it plank the athena. If something is dysplastic and it does not chase the enrica then it scalp the dyana. If something dogmatise the dyana and it plank the athena then it does not like the enrica. If something is dysplastic and it does not like the athena then it is primeval. The athena is dysplastic.", "logic": "\nnot Nosed(athena)\nDogmatise(athena, dyana)\nDogmatise(kenn, athena)\nCuticular(enrica)\nPlank(enrica, kenn)\nDogmatise(enrica, athena)\nDogmatise(enrica, dyana)\nScalp(dyana, kenn)\nScalp(dyana, enrica)\nExaugural(dyana)\nforall x (Dysplastic(x) -> Scalp(x, athena))\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, athena) -> Dysplastic(athena))\nforall x (Scalp(x, athena) -> not Dogmatise(athena, kenn))\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, kenn) -> Dysplastic(x))\nforall x (Cuticular(x) and Dogmatise(x, kenn) -> Plank(x, athena))\nforall x (Dysplastic(x) and not Scalp(x, enrica) -> Scalp(x, dyana))\nforall x (Dogmatise(x, dyana) and Plank(x, athena) -> not Plank(x, enrica))\nforall x (Dysplastic(x) and not Plank(x, athena) -> Primeval(x))\n\nDysplastic(athena)\n\nDogmatise(kenn, athena) and forall x (Dogmatise(x, athena) -> Dysplastic(athena)) -> therefore Dysplastic(athena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The clerissa is not biomedical. The clerissa spurn the gifford. The serena spurn the clerissa. The katie is mysterious. The katie conserve the serena. The katie spurn the clerissa. The katie spurn the gifford. The gifford dynamise the serena. The gifford dynamise the katie. The gifford is clannish. If something is exaugural then it dynamise the clerissa. If something spurn the clerissa then the clerissa is exaugural. If something dynamise the clerissa then the clerissa does not visit the serena. If something spurn the serena then it is exaugural. If something is mysterious and it spurn the serena then it conserve the clerissa. If something is exaugural and it does not chase the katie then it dynamise the gifford. If something spurn the gifford and it conserve the clerissa then it does not like the katie. If something is exaugural and it does not like the clerissa then it is seminal. The clerissa is not exaugural.", "logic": "\nnot Biomedical(clerissa)\nSpurn(clerissa, gifford)\nSpurn(serena, clerissa)\nMysterious(katie)\nConserve(katie, serena)\nSpurn(katie, clerissa)\nSpurn(katie, gifford)\nDynamise(gifford, serena)\nDynamise(gifford, katie)\nClannish(gifford)\nforall x (Exaugural(x) -> Dynamise(x, clerissa))\nforall x (Spurn(x, clerissa) -> Exaugural(clerissa))\nforall x (Dynamise(x, clerissa) -> not Spurn(clerissa, serena))\nforall x (Spurn(x, serena) -> Exaugural(x))\nforall x (Mysterious(x) and Spurn(x, serena) -> Conserve(x, clerissa))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) and not Dynamise(x, katie) -> Dynamise(x, gifford))\nforall x (Spurn(x, gifford) and Conserve(x, clerissa) -> not Conserve(x, katie))\nforall x (Exaugural(x) and not Conserve(x, clerissa) -> Seminal(x))\n\nnot Exaugural(clerissa)\n\nSpurn(serena, clerissa) and forall x (Spurn(x, clerissa) -> Exaugural(clerissa)) -> therefore Exaugural(clerissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The dino is not colonised. The dino guttle the thayne. The helena guttle the dino. The reece is disgustful. The reece receive the helena. The reece guttle the dino. The reece guttle the thayne. The thayne accouter the helena. The thayne accouter the reece. The thayne is dated. If something is infatuated then it accouter the dino. If something guttle the dino then the dino is infatuated. If something accouter the dino then the dino does not visit the helena. If something guttle the helena then it is infatuated. If something is disgustful and it guttle the helena then it receive the dino. If something is infatuated and it does not chase the reece then it accouter the thayne. If something guttle the thayne and it receive the dino then it does not like the reece. If something is infatuated and it does not like the dino then it is rearmost. The dino accouter the dino.", "logic": "\nnot Colonised(dino)\nGuttle(dino, thayne)\nGuttle(helena, dino)\nDisgustful(reece)\nReceive(reece, helena)\nGuttle(reece, dino)\nGuttle(reece, thayne)\nAccouter(thayne, helena)\nAccouter(thayne, reece)\nDated(thayne)\nforall x (Infatuated(x) -> Accouter(x, dino))\nforall x (Guttle(x, dino) -> Infatuated(dino))\nforall x (Accouter(x, dino) -> not Guttle(dino, helena))\nforall x (Guttle(x, helena) -> Infatuated(x))\nforall x (Disgustful(x) and Guttle(x, helena) -> Receive(x, dino))\nforall x (Infatuated(x) and not Accouter(x, reece) -> Accouter(x, thayne))\nforall x (Guttle(x, thayne) and Receive(x, dino) -> not Receive(x, reece))\nforall x (Infatuated(x) and not Receive(x, dino) -> Rearmost(x))\n\nAccouter(dino, dino)\n\nGuttle(helena, dino) and forall x (Guttle(x, dino) -> Infatuated(dino)) -> therefore Infatuated(dino) Infatuated(dino) and forall x (Infatuated(x) -> Accouter(x, dino)) -> therefore Accouter(dino, dino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The allegra is not amort. The allegra broil the anselm. The herve broil the allegra. The ally is colorectal. The ally number the herve. The ally broil the allegra. The ally broil the anselm. The anselm couple the herve. The anselm couple the ally. The anselm is unawed. If something is pudendal then it couple the allegra. If something broil the allegra then the allegra is pudendal. If something couple the allegra then the allegra does not visit the herve. If something broil the herve then it is pudendal. If something is colorectal and it broil the herve then it number the allegra. If something is pudendal and it does not chase the ally then it couple the anselm. If something broil the anselm and it number the allegra then it does not like the ally. If something is pudendal and it does not like the allegra then it is hexed. The allegra does not chase the allegra.", "logic": "\nnot Amort(allegra)\nBroil(allegra, anselm)\nBroil(herve, allegra)\nColorectal(ally)\nNumber(ally, herve)\nBroil(ally, allegra)\nBroil(ally, anselm)\nCouple(anselm, herve)\nCouple(anselm, ally)\nUnawed(anselm)\nforall x (Pudendal(x) -> Couple(x, allegra))\nforall x (Broil(x, allegra) -> Pudendal(allegra))\nforall x (Couple(x, allegra) -> not Broil(allegra, herve))\nforall x (Broil(x, herve) -> Pudendal(x))\nforall x (Colorectal(x) and Broil(x, herve) -> Number(x, allegra))\nforall x (Pudendal(x) and not Couple(x, ally) -> Couple(x, anselm))\nforall x (Broil(x, anselm) and Number(x, allegra) -> not Number(x, ally))\nforall x (Pudendal(x) and not Number(x, allegra) -> Hexed(x))\n\nnot Couple(allegra, allegra)\n\nBroil(herve, allegra) and forall x (Broil(x, allegra) -> Pudendal(allegra)) -> therefore Pudendal(allegra) Pudendal(allegra) and forall x (Pudendal(x) -> Couple(x, allegra)) -> therefore Couple(allegra, allegra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The sigfried is not undepicted. The sigfried mismanage the dorthea. The olivette mismanage the sigfried. The easter is unshaped. The easter allude the olivette. The easter mismanage the sigfried. The easter mismanage the dorthea. The dorthea alleviate the olivette. The dorthea alleviate the easter. The dorthea is hilar. If something is leechlike then it alleviate the sigfried. If something mismanage the sigfried then the sigfried is leechlike. If something alleviate the sigfried then the sigfried does not visit the olivette. If something mismanage the olivette then it is leechlike. If something is unshaped and it mismanage the olivette then it allude the sigfried. If something is leechlike and it does not chase the easter then it alleviate the dorthea. If something mismanage the dorthea and it allude the sigfried then it does not like the easter. If something is leechlike and it does not like the sigfried then it is bulgy. The sigfried does not visit the olivette.", "logic": "\nnot Undepicted(sigfried)\nMismanage(sigfried, dorthea)\nMismanage(olivette, sigfried)\nUnshaped(easter)\nAllude(easter, olivette)\nMismanage(easter, sigfried)\nMismanage(easter, dorthea)\nAlleviate(dorthea, olivette)\nAlleviate(dorthea, easter)\nHilar(dorthea)\nforall x (Leechlike(x) -> Alleviate(x, sigfried))\nforall x (Mismanage(x, sigfried) -> Leechlike(sigfried))\nforall x (Alleviate(x, sigfried) -> not Mismanage(sigfried, olivette))\nforall x (Mismanage(x, olivette) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Unshaped(x) and Mismanage(x, olivette) -> Allude(x, sigfried))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) and not Alleviate(x, easter) -> Alleviate(x, dorthea))\nforall x (Mismanage(x, dorthea) and Allude(x, sigfried) -> not Allude(x, easter))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) and not Allude(x, sigfried) -> Bulgy(x))\n\nnot Mismanage(sigfried, olivette)\n\nMismanage(olivette, sigfried) and forall x (Mismanage(x, sigfried) -> Leechlike(sigfried)) -> therefore Leechlike(sigfried) Leechlike(sigfried) and forall x (Leechlike(x) -> Alleviate(x, sigfried)) -> therefore Alleviate(sigfried, sigfried) Alleviate(sigfried, sigfried) and forall x (Alleviate(x, sigfried) -> not Mismanage(sigfried, olivette)) -> therefore not Mismanage(sigfried, olivette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The francoise is not coquettish. The francoise colorcast the rachele. The rennie colorcast the francoise. The roobbie is slumberous. The roobbie envelop the rennie. The roobbie colorcast the francoise. The roobbie colorcast the rachele. The rachele point the rennie. The rachele point the roobbie. The rachele is anaemic. If something is wordless then it point the francoise. If something colorcast the francoise then the francoise is wordless. If something point the francoise then the francoise does not visit the rennie. If something colorcast the rennie then it is wordless. If something is slumberous and it colorcast the rennie then it envelop the francoise. If something is wordless and it does not chase the roobbie then it point the rachele. If something colorcast the rachele and it envelop the francoise then it does not like the roobbie. If something is wordless and it does not like the francoise then it is peaky. The francoise colorcast the rennie.", "logic": "\nnot Coquettish(francoise)\nColorcast(francoise, rachele)\nColorcast(rennie, francoise)\nSlumberous(roobbie)\nEnvelop(roobbie, rennie)\nColorcast(roobbie, francoise)\nColorcast(roobbie, rachele)\nPoint(rachele, rennie)\nPoint(rachele, roobbie)\nAnaemic(rachele)\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Point(x, francoise))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, francoise) -> Wordless(francoise))\nforall x (Point(x, francoise) -> not Colorcast(francoise, rennie))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, rennie) -> Wordless(x))\nforall x (Slumberous(x) and Colorcast(x, rennie) -> Envelop(x, francoise))\nforall x (Wordless(x) and not Point(x, roobbie) -> Point(x, rachele))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, rachele) and Envelop(x, francoise) -> not Envelop(x, roobbie))\nforall x (Wordless(x) and not Envelop(x, francoise) -> Peaky(x))\n\nColorcast(francoise, rennie)\n\nColorcast(rennie, francoise) and forall x (Colorcast(x, francoise) -> Wordless(francoise)) -> therefore Wordless(francoise) Wordless(francoise) and forall x (Wordless(x) -> Point(x, francoise)) -> therefore Point(francoise, francoise) Point(francoise, francoise) and forall x (Point(x, francoise) -> not Colorcast(francoise, rennie)) -> therefore not Colorcast(francoise, rennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The sarajane is not smelly. The sarajane glamourise the kelila. The dawna glamourise the sarajane. The audry is american. The audry allowance the dawna. The audry glamourise the sarajane. The audry glamourise the kelila. The kelila feel the dawna. The kelila feel the audry. The kelila is actual. If something is diarrhoeic then it feel the sarajane. If something glamourise the sarajane then the sarajane is diarrhoeic. If something feel the sarajane then the sarajane does not visit the dawna. If something glamourise the dawna then it is diarrhoeic. If something is american and it glamourise the dawna then it allowance the sarajane. If something is diarrhoeic and it does not chase the audry then it feel the kelila. If something glamourise the kelila and it allowance the sarajane then it does not like the audry. If something is diarrhoeic and it does not like the sarajane then it is assured. The audry does not like the sarajane.", "logic": "\nnot Smelly(sarajane)\nGlamourise(sarajane, kelila)\nGlamourise(dawna, sarajane)\nAmerican(audry)\nAllowance(audry, dawna)\nGlamourise(audry, sarajane)\nGlamourise(audry, kelila)\nFeel(kelila, dawna)\nFeel(kelila, audry)\nActual(kelila)\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) -> Feel(x, sarajane))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, sarajane) -> Diarrhoeic(sarajane))\nforall x (Feel(x, sarajane) -> not Glamourise(sarajane, dawna))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, dawna) -> Diarrhoeic(x))\nforall x (American(x) and Glamourise(x, dawna) -> Allowance(x, sarajane))\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) and not Feel(x, audry) -> Feel(x, kelila))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, kelila) and Allowance(x, sarajane) -> not Allowance(x, audry))\nforall x (Diarrhoeic(x) and not Allowance(x, sarajane) -> Assured(x))\n\nnot Allowance(audry, sarajane)\n\nforall x (American(x) and Glamourise(x, dawna) -> Allowance(x, sarajane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The lorelei is not unfirm. The lorelei catalog the clancy. The caro catalog the lorelei. The layne is unpeaceful. The layne retry the caro. The layne catalog the lorelei. The layne catalog the clancy. The clancy bituminise the caro. The clancy bituminise the layne. The clancy is dreamlike. If something is gemmed then it bituminise the lorelei. If something catalog the lorelei then the lorelei is gemmed. If something bituminise the lorelei then the lorelei does not visit the caro. If something catalog the caro then it is gemmed. If something is unpeaceful and it catalog the caro then it retry the lorelei. If something is gemmed and it does not chase the layne then it bituminise the clancy. If something catalog the clancy and it retry the lorelei then it does not like the layne. If something is gemmed and it does not like the lorelei then it is anagogical. The caro bituminise the lorelei.", "logic": "\nnot Unfirm(lorelei)\nCatalog(lorelei, clancy)\nCatalog(caro, lorelei)\nUnpeaceful(layne)\nRetry(layne, caro)\nCatalog(layne, lorelei)\nCatalog(layne, clancy)\nBituminise(clancy, caro)\nBituminise(clancy, layne)\nDreamlike(clancy)\nforall x (Gemmed(x) -> Bituminise(x, lorelei))\nforall x (Catalog(x, lorelei) -> Gemmed(lorelei))\nforall x (Bituminise(x, lorelei) -> not Catalog(lorelei, caro))\nforall x (Catalog(x, caro) -> Gemmed(x))\nforall x (Unpeaceful(x) and Catalog(x, caro) -> Retry(x, lorelei))\nforall x (Gemmed(x) and not Bituminise(x, layne) -> Bituminise(x, clancy))\nforall x (Catalog(x, clancy) and Retry(x, lorelei) -> not Retry(x, layne))\nforall x (Gemmed(x) and not Retry(x, lorelei) -> Anagogical(x))\n\nBituminise(caro, lorelei)\n\nforall x (Gemmed(x) -> Bituminise(x, lorelei)) <- forall x (Catalog(x, caro) -> Gemmed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The alisa is not pivotal. The alisa tunnel the wit. The danice tunnel the alisa. The wren is glorified. The wren worsen the danice. The wren tunnel the alisa. The wren tunnel the wit. The wit obstipate the danice. The wit obstipate the wren. The wit is aglitter. If something is mechanised then it obstipate the alisa. If something tunnel the alisa then the alisa is mechanised. If something obstipate the alisa then the alisa does not visit the danice. If something tunnel the danice then it is mechanised. If something is glorified and it tunnel the danice then it worsen the alisa. If something is mechanised and it does not chase the wren then it obstipate the wit. If something tunnel the wit and it worsen the alisa then it does not like the wren. If something is mechanised and it does not like the alisa then it is fashioned. The alisa is not fashioned.", "logic": "\nnot Pivotal(alisa)\nTunnel(alisa, wit)\nTunnel(danice, alisa)\nGlorified(wren)\nWorsen(wren, danice)\nTunnel(wren, alisa)\nTunnel(wren, wit)\nObstipate(wit, danice)\nObstipate(wit, wren)\nAglitter(wit)\nforall x (Mechanised(x) -> Obstipate(x, alisa))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, alisa) -> Mechanised(alisa))\nforall x (Obstipate(x, alisa) -> not Tunnel(alisa, danice))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, danice) -> Mechanised(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) and Tunnel(x, danice) -> Worsen(x, alisa))\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and not Obstipate(x, wren) -> Obstipate(x, wit))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, wit) and Worsen(x, alisa) -> not Worsen(x, wren))\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and not Worsen(x, alisa) -> Fashioned(x))\n\nnot Fashioned(alisa)\n\nforall x (Mechanised(x) and not Worsen(x, alisa) -> Fashioned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The sharra is not algophobic. The sharra juggle the samson. The rogers juggle the sharra. The leonid is lilting. The leonid dialyse the rogers. The leonid juggle the sharra. The leonid juggle the samson. The samson captain the rogers. The samson captain the leonid. The samson is ignoble. If something is hundred then it captain the sharra. If something juggle the sharra then the sharra is hundred. If something captain the sharra then the sharra does not visit the rogers. If something juggle the rogers then it is hundred. If something is lilting and it juggle the rogers then it dialyse the sharra. If something is hundred and it does not chase the leonid then it captain the samson. If something juggle the samson and it dialyse the sharra then it does not like the leonid. If something is hundred and it does not like the sharra then it is eastside. The samson is hundred.", "logic": "\nnot Algophobic(sharra)\nJuggle(sharra, samson)\nJuggle(rogers, sharra)\nLilting(leonid)\nDialyse(leonid, rogers)\nJuggle(leonid, sharra)\nJuggle(leonid, samson)\nCaptain(samson, rogers)\nCaptain(samson, leonid)\nIgnoble(samson)\nforall x (Hundred(x) -> Captain(x, sharra))\nforall x (Juggle(x, sharra) -> Hundred(sharra))\nforall x (Captain(x, sharra) -> not Juggle(sharra, rogers))\nforall x (Juggle(x, rogers) -> Hundred(x))\nforall x (Lilting(x) and Juggle(x, rogers) -> Dialyse(x, sharra))\nforall x (Hundred(x) and not Captain(x, leonid) -> Captain(x, samson))\nforall x (Juggle(x, samson) and Dialyse(x, sharra) -> not Dialyse(x, leonid))\nforall x (Hundred(x) and not Dialyse(x, sharra) -> Eastside(x))\n\nHundred(samson)\n\nforall x (Juggle(x, rogers) -> Hundred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The corella is not dendritic. The corella collide the franky. The iona collide the corella. The nanice is onshore. The nanice turtle the iona. The nanice collide the corella. The nanice collide the franky. The franky remediate the iona. The franky remediate the nanice. The franky is furlike. If something is ohmic then it remediate the corella. If something collide the corella then the corella is ohmic. If something remediate the corella then the corella does not visit the iona. If something collide the iona then it is ohmic. If something is onshore and it collide the iona then it turtle the corella. If something is ohmic and it does not chase the nanice then it remediate the franky. If something collide the franky and it turtle the corella then it does not like the nanice. If something is ohmic and it does not like the corella then it is disgusted. The iona does not like the franky.", "logic": "\nnot Dendritic(corella)\nCollide(corella, franky)\nCollide(iona, corella)\nOnshore(nanice)\nTurtle(nanice, iona)\nCollide(nanice, corella)\nCollide(nanice, franky)\nRemediate(franky, iona)\nRemediate(franky, nanice)\nFurlike(franky)\nforall x (Ohmic(x) -> Remediate(x, corella))\nforall x (Collide(x, corella) -> Ohmic(corella))\nforall x (Remediate(x, corella) -> not Collide(corella, iona))\nforall x (Collide(x, iona) -> Ohmic(x))\nforall x (Onshore(x) and Collide(x, iona) -> Turtle(x, corella))\nforall x (Ohmic(x) and not Remediate(x, nanice) -> Remediate(x, franky))\nforall x (Collide(x, franky) and Turtle(x, corella) -> not Turtle(x, nanice))\nforall x (Ohmic(x) and not Turtle(x, corella) -> Disgusted(x))\n\nnot Turtle(iona, franky)\n\nnot Turtle(iona, franky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The jessamine is not grovelling. The jessamine cantilever the davide. The lars cantilever the jessamine. The puff is linelike. The puff misadvise the lars. The puff cantilever the jessamine. The puff cantilever the davide. The davide crossbreed the lars. The davide crossbreed the puff. The davide is estranged. If something is oppositive then it crossbreed the jessamine. If something cantilever the jessamine then the jessamine is oppositive. If something crossbreed the jessamine then the jessamine does not visit the lars. If something cantilever the lars then it is oppositive. If something is linelike and it cantilever the lars then it misadvise the jessamine. If something is oppositive and it does not chase the puff then it crossbreed the davide. If something cantilever the davide and it misadvise the jessamine then it does not like the puff. If something is oppositive and it does not like the jessamine then it is upcountry. The lars cantilever the davide.", "logic": "\nnot Grovelling(jessamine)\nCantilever(jessamine, davide)\nCantilever(lars, jessamine)\nLinelike(puff)\nMisadvise(puff, lars)\nCantilever(puff, jessamine)\nCantilever(puff, davide)\nCrossbreed(davide, lars)\nCrossbreed(davide, puff)\nEstranged(davide)\nforall x (Oppositive(x) -> Crossbreed(x, jessamine))\nforall x (Cantilever(x, jessamine) -> Oppositive(jessamine))\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, jessamine) -> not Cantilever(jessamine, lars))\nforall x (Cantilever(x, lars) -> Oppositive(x))\nforall x (Linelike(x) and Cantilever(x, lars) -> Misadvise(x, jessamine))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) and not Crossbreed(x, puff) -> Crossbreed(x, davide))\nforall x (Cantilever(x, davide) and Misadvise(x, jessamine) -> not Misadvise(x, puff))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) and not Misadvise(x, jessamine) -> Upcountry(x))\n\nCantilever(lars, davide)\n\nCantilever(lars, davide) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The jimbo is not iridic. The jimbo roughen the kacy. The bertha roughen the jimbo. The tedd is franciscan. The tedd paste the bertha. The tedd roughen the jimbo. The tedd roughen the kacy. The kacy pucker the bertha. The kacy pucker the tedd. The kacy is enzootic. If something is crabwise then it pucker the jimbo. If something roughen the jimbo then the jimbo is crabwise. If something pucker the jimbo then the jimbo does not visit the bertha. If something roughen the bertha then it is crabwise. If something is franciscan and it roughen the bertha then it paste the jimbo. If something is crabwise and it does not chase the tedd then it pucker the kacy. If something roughen the kacy and it paste the jimbo then it does not like the tedd. If something is crabwise and it does not like the jimbo then it is thirdhand. The jimbo does not visit the jimbo.", "logic": "\nnot Iridic(jimbo)\nRoughen(jimbo, kacy)\nRoughen(bertha, jimbo)\nFranciscan(tedd)\nPaste(tedd, bertha)\nRoughen(tedd, jimbo)\nRoughen(tedd, kacy)\nPucker(kacy, bertha)\nPucker(kacy, tedd)\nEnzootic(kacy)\nforall x (Crabwise(x) -> Pucker(x, jimbo))\nforall x (Roughen(x, jimbo) -> Crabwise(jimbo))\nforall x (Pucker(x, jimbo) -> not Roughen(jimbo, bertha))\nforall x (Roughen(x, bertha) -> Crabwise(x))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) and Roughen(x, bertha) -> Paste(x, jimbo))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) and not Pucker(x, tedd) -> Pucker(x, kacy))\nforall x (Roughen(x, kacy) and Paste(x, jimbo) -> not Paste(x, tedd))\nforall x (Crabwise(x) and not Paste(x, jimbo) -> Thirdhand(x))\n\nnot Roughen(jimbo, jimbo)\n\nnot Roughen(jimbo, jimbo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "The shell is not placable. The shell hector the heda. The hebert hector the shell. The lynda is felicitous. The lynda hush the hebert. The lynda hector the shell. The lynda hector the heda. The heda bench the hebert. The heda bench the lynda. The heda is isometric. If something is projected then it bench the shell. If something hector the shell then the shell is projected. If something bench the shell then the shell does not visit the hebert. If something hector the hebert then it is projected. If something is felicitous and it hector the hebert then it hush the shell. If something is projected and it does not chase the lynda then it bench the heda. If something hector the heda and it hush the shell then it does not like the lynda. If something is projected and it does not like the shell then it is vibrant. The hebert bench the hebert.", "logic": "\nnot Placable(shell)\nHector(shell, heda)\nHector(hebert, shell)\nFelicitous(lynda)\nHush(lynda, hebert)\nHector(lynda, shell)\nHector(lynda, heda)\nBench(heda, hebert)\nBench(heda, lynda)\nIsometric(heda)\nforall x (Projected(x) -> Bench(x, shell))\nforall x (Hector(x, shell) -> Projected(shell))\nforall x (Bench(x, shell) -> not Hector(shell, hebert))\nforall x (Hector(x, hebert) -> Projected(x))\nforall x (Felicitous(x) and Hector(x, hebert) -> Hush(x, shell))\nforall x (Projected(x) and not Bench(x, lynda) -> Bench(x, heda))\nforall x (Hector(x, heda) and Hush(x, shell) -> not Hush(x, lynda))\nforall x (Projected(x) and not Hush(x, shell) -> Vibrant(x))\n\nBench(hebert, hebert)\n\nBench(hebert, hebert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1330"} {"premises": "Shelia is dicey. Shelia is northmost. Theo is chiliastic. Theo is northmost. Theo is trying. Jory is dicey. Jory is jelled. Kind people are jelled. Nice people are jelled. Big, northmost people are jelled. If someone is jelled and chiliastic then they are optimal. Nice, northmost people are optimal. Smart, jelled people are arboreous. Big, arboreous people are dicey. If someone is chiliastic and optimal then they are arboreous. Jory is dicey.", "logic": "\nDicey(shelia)\nNorthmost(shelia)\nChiliastic(theo)\nNorthmost(theo)\nTrying(theo)\nDicey(jory)\nJelled(jory)\nforall x (Northmost(x) -> Jelled(x))\nforall x (Arboreous(x) -> Jelled(x))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) and Northmost(x) -> Jelled(x))\nforall x (Jelled(x) and Chiliastic(x) -> Optimal(x))\nforall x (Arboreous(x) and Northmost(x) -> Optimal(x))\nforall x (Trying(x) and Jelled(x) -> Arboreous(x))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) and Arboreous(x) -> Dicey(x))\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) and Optimal(x) -> Arboreous(x))\n\nDicey(jory)\n\ntherefore Dicey(jory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Arnie is even. Arnie is signal. Ragnar is ergonomic. Ragnar is signal. Ragnar is manifold. Diamond is even. Diamond is handless. Kind people are handless. Nice people are handless. Big, signal people are handless. If someone is handless and ergonomic then they are paleozoic. Nice, signal people are paleozoic. Smart, handless people are purposive. Big, purposive people are even. If someone is ergonomic and paleozoic then they are purposive. Diamond is not handless.", "logic": "\nEven(arnie)\nSignal(arnie)\nErgonomic(ragnar)\nSignal(ragnar)\nManifold(ragnar)\nEven(diamond)\nHandless(diamond)\nforall x (Signal(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Purposive(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) and Signal(x) -> Handless(x))\nforall x (Handless(x) and Ergonomic(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Purposive(x) and Signal(x) -> Paleozoic(x))\nforall x (Manifold(x) and Handless(x) -> Purposive(x))\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) and Purposive(x) -> Even(x))\nforall x (Ergonomic(x) and Paleozoic(x) -> Purposive(x))\n\nnot Handless(diamond)\n\ntherefore Handless(diamond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Ethelyn is pectic. Ethelyn is babelike. Carma is stalemated. Carma is babelike. Carma is unexpended. Lorene is pectic. Lorene is avid. Kind people are avid. Nice people are avid. Big, babelike people are avid. If someone is avid and stalemated then they are conniving. Nice, babelike people are conniving. Smart, avid people are overheated. Big, overheated people are pectic. If someone is stalemated and conniving then they are overheated. Ethelyn is avid.", "logic": "\nPectic(ethelyn)\nBabelike(ethelyn)\nStalemated(carma)\nBabelike(carma)\nUnexpended(carma)\nPectic(lorene)\nAvid(lorene)\nforall x (Babelike(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Overheated(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Babelike(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Avid(x) and Stalemated(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Overheated(x) and Babelike(x) -> Conniving(x))\nforall x (Unexpended(x) and Avid(x) -> Overheated(x))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Overheated(x) -> Pectic(x))\nforall x (Stalemated(x) and Conniving(x) -> Overheated(x))\n\nAvid(ethelyn)\n\nBabelike(ethelyn) and forall x (Babelike(x) -> Avid(x)) -> therefore Avid(ethelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Gwennie is merging. Gwennie is morganatic. Athena is abducent. Athena is morganatic. Athena is unsated. Duffy is merging. Duffy is cerulean. Kind people are cerulean. Nice people are cerulean. Big, morganatic people are cerulean. If someone is cerulean and abducent then they are dickensian. Nice, morganatic people are dickensian. Smart, cerulean people are bottommost. Big, bottommost people are merging. If someone is abducent and dickensian then they are bottommost. Gwennie is not cerulean.", "logic": "\nMerging(gwennie)\nMorganatic(gwennie)\nAbducent(athena)\nMorganatic(athena)\nUnsated(athena)\nMerging(duffy)\nCerulean(duffy)\nforall x (Morganatic(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) and Morganatic(x) -> Cerulean(x))\nforall x (Cerulean(x) and Abducent(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) and Morganatic(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Unsated(x) and Cerulean(x) -> Bottommost(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) and Bottommost(x) -> Merging(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) and Dickensian(x) -> Bottommost(x))\n\nnot Cerulean(gwennie)\n\nMorganatic(gwennie) and forall x (Morganatic(x) -> Cerulean(x)) -> therefore Cerulean(gwennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Jakob is intestinal. Jakob is falcate. Bernie is west. Bernie is falcate. Bernie is preanal. Quiggly is intestinal. Quiggly is bitterish. Kind people are bitterish. Nice people are bitterish. Big, falcate people are bitterish. If someone is bitterish and west then they are racy. Nice, falcate people are racy. Smart, bitterish people are neoliberal. Big, neoliberal people are intestinal. If someone is west and racy then they are neoliberal. Bernie is racy.", "logic": "\nIntestinal(jakob)\nFalcate(jakob)\nWest(bernie)\nFalcate(bernie)\nPreanal(bernie)\nIntestinal(quiggly)\nBitterish(quiggly)\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (West(x) and Falcate(x) -> Bitterish(x))\nforall x (Bitterish(x) and West(x) -> Racy(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Falcate(x) -> Racy(x))\nforall x (Preanal(x) and Bitterish(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nforall x (West(x) and Neoliberal(x) -> Intestinal(x))\nforall x (West(x) and Racy(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\n\nRacy(bernie)\n\nFalcate(bernie) and forall x (Falcate(x) -> Bitterish(x)) -> therefore Bitterish(bernie) Bitterish(bernie) and West(bernie) and forall x (Bitterish(x) and West(x) -> Racy(x)) -> therefore Racy(bernie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Danila is delicate. Danila is arsenious. Lise is transfixed. Lise is arsenious. Lise is empiric. Lurette is delicate. Lurette is waterproof. Kind people are waterproof. Nice people are waterproof. Big, arsenious people are waterproof. If someone is waterproof and transfixed then they are columnlike. Nice, arsenious people are columnlike. Smart, waterproof people are bracteal. Big, bracteal people are delicate. If someone is transfixed and columnlike then they are bracteal. Lise is not columnlike.", "logic": "\nDelicate(danila)\nArsenious(danila)\nTransfixed(lise)\nArsenious(lise)\nEmpiric(lise)\nDelicate(lurette)\nWaterproof(lurette)\nforall x (Arsenious(x) -> Waterproof(x))\nforall x (Bracteal(x) -> Waterproof(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) and Arsenious(x) -> Waterproof(x))\nforall x (Waterproof(x) and Transfixed(x) -> Columnlike(x))\nforall x (Bracteal(x) and Arsenious(x) -> Columnlike(x))\nforall x (Empiric(x) and Waterproof(x) -> Bracteal(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) and Bracteal(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) and Columnlike(x) -> Bracteal(x))\n\nnot Columnlike(lise)\n\nArsenious(lise) and forall x (Arsenious(x) -> Waterproof(x)) -> therefore Waterproof(lise) Waterproof(lise) and Transfixed(lise) and forall x (Waterproof(x) and Transfixed(x) -> Columnlike(x)) -> therefore Columnlike(lise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Damaris is homicidal. Damaris is spiral. Dwaine is epiphysial. Dwaine is spiral. Dwaine is fiducial. Helaine is homicidal. Helaine is bloody. Kind people are bloody. Nice people are bloody. Big, spiral people are bloody. If someone is bloody and epiphysial then they are mishnaic. Nice, spiral people are mishnaic. Smart, bloody people are pliant. Big, pliant people are homicidal. If someone is epiphysial and mishnaic then they are pliant. Damaris is not mishnaic.", "logic": "\nHomicidal(damaris)\nSpiral(damaris)\nEpiphysial(dwaine)\nSpiral(dwaine)\nFiducial(dwaine)\nHomicidal(helaine)\nBloody(helaine)\nforall x (Spiral(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Pliant(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) and Spiral(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and Epiphysial(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Pliant(x) and Spiral(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Fiducial(x) and Bloody(x) -> Pliant(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) and Pliant(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Epiphysial(x) and Mishnaic(x) -> Pliant(x))\n\nnot Mishnaic(damaris)\n\nforall x (Pliant(x) and Spiral(x) -> Mishnaic(x)) <- forall x (Fiducial(x) and Bloody(x) -> Pliant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Jed is welcoming. Jed is aground. Tillie is ataraxic. Tillie is aground. Tillie is gamey. Len is welcoming. Len is brash. Kind people are brash. Nice people are brash. Big, aground people are brash. If someone is brash and ataraxic then they are narrowed. Nice, aground people are narrowed. Smart, brash people are loony. Big, loony people are welcoming. If someone is ataraxic and narrowed then they are loony. Jed is loony.", "logic": "\nWelcoming(jed)\nAground(jed)\nAtaraxic(tillie)\nAground(tillie)\nGamey(tillie)\nWelcoming(len)\nBrash(len)\nforall x (Aground(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Loony(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Ataraxic(x) and Aground(x) -> Brash(x))\nforall x (Brash(x) and Ataraxic(x) -> Narrowed(x))\nforall x (Loony(x) and Aground(x) -> Narrowed(x))\nforall x (Gamey(x) and Brash(x) -> Loony(x))\nforall x (Ataraxic(x) and Loony(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nforall x (Ataraxic(x) and Narrowed(x) -> Loony(x))\n\nLoony(jed)\n\nforall x (Gamey(x) and Brash(x) -> Loony(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Hiralal is rangy. Hiralal is impressed. Thorvald is supplicant. Thorvald is impressed. Thorvald is bionic. Georgia is rangy. Georgia is bedraggled. Kind people are bedraggled. Nice people are bedraggled. Big, impressed people are bedraggled. If someone is bedraggled and supplicant then they are pectineal. Nice, impressed people are pectineal. Smart, bedraggled people are roast. Big, roast people are rangy. If someone is supplicant and pectineal then they are roast. Georgia is not pectineal.", "logic": "\nRangy(hiralal)\nImpressed(hiralal)\nSupplicant(thorvald)\nImpressed(thorvald)\nBionic(thorvald)\nRangy(georgia)\nBedraggled(georgia)\nforall x (Impressed(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) and Impressed(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nforall x (Roast(x) and Impressed(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nforall x (Bionic(x) and Bedraggled(x) -> Roast(x))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) and Roast(x) -> Rangy(x))\nforall x (Supplicant(x) and Pectineal(x) -> Roast(x))\n\nnot Pectineal(georgia)\n\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Pectineal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Sal is abscessed. Sal is smelly. Lilias is skewed. Lilias is smelly. Lilias is branchial. Sioux is abscessed. Sioux is quizzical. Kind people are quizzical. Nice people are quizzical. Big, smelly people are quizzical. If someone is quizzical and skewed then they are gaudy. Nice, smelly people are gaudy. Smart, quizzical people are zymoid. Big, zymoid people are abscessed. If someone is skewed and gaudy then they are zymoid. Sal is branchial.", "logic": "\nAbscessed(sal)\nSmelly(sal)\nSkewed(lilias)\nSmelly(lilias)\nBranchial(lilias)\nAbscessed(sioux)\nQuizzical(sioux)\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Quizzical(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) -> Quizzical(x))\nforall x (Skewed(x) and Smelly(x) -> Quizzical(x))\nforall x (Quizzical(x) and Skewed(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) and Smelly(x) -> Gaudy(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) and Quizzical(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Skewed(x) and Zymoid(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Skewed(x) and Gaudy(x) -> Zymoid(x))\n\nBranchial(sal)\n\nBranchial(sal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Shandee is filar. Shandee is extraneous. Dwain is chadian. Dwain is extraneous. Dwain is frontal. Vivian is filar. Vivian is zesty. Kind people are zesty. Nice people are zesty. Big, extraneous people are zesty. If someone is zesty and chadian then they are congestive. Nice, extraneous people are congestive. Smart, zesty people are unwanted. Big, unwanted people are filar. If someone is chadian and congestive then they are unwanted. Vivian is not chadian.", "logic": "\nFilar(shandee)\nExtraneous(shandee)\nChadian(dwain)\nExtraneous(dwain)\nFrontal(dwain)\nFilar(vivian)\nZesty(vivian)\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Zesty(x))\nforall x (Unwanted(x) -> Zesty(x))\nforall x (Chadian(x) and Extraneous(x) -> Zesty(x))\nforall x (Zesty(x) and Chadian(x) -> Congestive(x))\nforall x (Unwanted(x) and Extraneous(x) -> Congestive(x))\nforall x (Frontal(x) and Zesty(x) -> Unwanted(x))\nforall x (Chadian(x) and Unwanted(x) -> Filar(x))\nforall x (Chadian(x) and Congestive(x) -> Unwanted(x))\n\nnot Chadian(vivian)\n\nnot Chadian(vivian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Marrissa is reusable. Marrissa is attainable. Sallyann is blatant. Sallyann is attainable. Sallyann is gastric. Ailene is reusable. Ailene is latin. Kind people are latin. Nice people are latin. Big, attainable people are latin. If someone is latin and blatant then they are parked. Nice, attainable people are parked. Smart, latin people are goethean. Big, goethean people are reusable. If someone is blatant and parked then they are goethean. Marrissa is blatant.", "logic": "\nReusable(marrissa)\nAttainable(marrissa)\nBlatant(sallyann)\nAttainable(sallyann)\nGastric(sallyann)\nReusable(ailene)\nLatin(ailene)\nforall x (Attainable(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Goethean(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Blatant(x) and Attainable(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) and Blatant(x) -> Parked(x))\nforall x (Goethean(x) and Attainable(x) -> Parked(x))\nforall x (Gastric(x) and Latin(x) -> Goethean(x))\nforall x (Blatant(x) and Goethean(x) -> Reusable(x))\nforall x (Blatant(x) and Parked(x) -> Goethean(x))\n\nBlatant(marrissa)\n\nBlatant(marrissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2251"} {"premises": "Sophronia is enured. Sophronia is clxx. Sophronia is incestuous. Sophronia is procedural. Putnam is not attenuate. Putnam is curricular. Putnam is clxx. Putnam is incestuous. Julianne is not funny. Bill is incestuous. All attenuate things are curricular. If Putnam is enured and Putnam is attenuate then Putnam is procedural. All procedural things are attenuate. Bill is incestuous.", "logic": "\nEnured(sophronia)\nClxx(sophronia)\nIncestuous(sophronia)\nProcedural(sophronia)\nnot Attenuate(putnam)\nCurricular(putnam)\nClxx(putnam)\nIncestuous(putnam)\nnot Funny(julianne)\nIncestuous(bill)\nforall x (Attenuate(x) -> Curricular(x))\nEnured(putnam) and Attenuate(putnam) -> Procedural(putnam)\nforall x (Procedural(x) -> Attenuate(x))\n\nIncestuous(bill)\n\ntherefore Incestuous(bill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Bertram is slick. Bertram is scapose. Bertram is helpless. Bertram is shopworn. Northrop is not revocable. Northrop is despairing. Northrop is scapose. Northrop is helpless. Kyrstin is not tangerine. Roz is helpless. All revocable things are despairing. If Northrop is slick and Northrop is revocable then Northrop is shopworn. All shopworn things are revocable. Bertram is not shopworn.", "logic": "\nSlick(bertram)\nScapose(bertram)\nHelpless(bertram)\nShopworn(bertram)\nnot Revocable(northrop)\nDespairing(northrop)\nScapose(northrop)\nHelpless(northrop)\nnot Tangerine(kyrstin)\nHelpless(roz)\nforall x (Revocable(x) -> Despairing(x))\nSlick(northrop) and Revocable(northrop) -> Shopworn(northrop)\nforall x (Shopworn(x) -> Revocable(x))\n\nnot Shopworn(bertram)\n\ntherefore Shopworn(bertram)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Joella is algebraic. Joella is hindu. Joella is wriggly. Joella is honorific. Vasili is not datable. Vasili is unexcelled. Vasili is hindu. Vasili is wriggly. Gordie is not quaternate. Giffer is wriggly. All datable things are unexcelled. If Vasili is algebraic and Vasili is datable then Vasili is honorific. All honorific things are datable. Joella is datable.", "logic": "\nAlgebraic(joella)\nHindu(joella)\nWriggly(joella)\nHonorific(joella)\nnot Datable(vasili)\nUnexcelled(vasili)\nHindu(vasili)\nWriggly(vasili)\nnot Quaternate(gordie)\nWriggly(giffer)\nforall x (Datable(x) -> Unexcelled(x))\nAlgebraic(vasili) and Datable(vasili) -> Honorific(vasili)\nforall x (Honorific(x) -> Datable(x))\n\nDatable(joella)\n\nHonorific(joella) and forall x (Honorific(x) -> Datable(x)) -> therefore Datable(joella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Opaline is taliped. Opaline is redbrick. Opaline is gammy. Opaline is impeccable. Ethelred is not gnarly. Ethelred is known. Ethelred is redbrick. Ethelred is gammy. Pascale is not phonemic. Dillon is gammy. All gnarly things are known. If Ethelred is taliped and Ethelred is gnarly then Ethelred is impeccable. All impeccable things are gnarly. Opaline is not gnarly.", "logic": "\nTaliped(opaline)\nRedbrick(opaline)\nGammy(opaline)\nImpeccable(opaline)\nnot Gnarly(ethelred)\nKnown(ethelred)\nRedbrick(ethelred)\nGammy(ethelred)\nnot Phonemic(pascale)\nGammy(dillon)\nforall x (Gnarly(x) -> Known(x))\nTaliped(ethelred) and Gnarly(ethelred) -> Impeccable(ethelred)\nforall x (Impeccable(x) -> Gnarly(x))\n\nnot Gnarly(opaline)\n\nImpeccable(opaline) and forall x (Impeccable(x) -> Gnarly(x)) -> therefore Gnarly(opaline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Sindee is unopposed. Sindee is parvenu. Sindee is concave. Sindee is tawny. Karlyn is not engraved. Karlyn is bearish. Karlyn is parvenu. Karlyn is concave. Demetri is not lipless. Marius is concave. All engraved things are bearish. If Karlyn is unopposed and Karlyn is engraved then Karlyn is tawny. All tawny things are engraved. Sindee is bearish.", "logic": "\nUnopposed(sindee)\nParvenu(sindee)\nConcave(sindee)\nTawny(sindee)\nnot Engraved(karlyn)\nBearish(karlyn)\nParvenu(karlyn)\nConcave(karlyn)\nnot Lipless(demetri)\nConcave(marius)\nforall x (Engraved(x) -> Bearish(x))\nUnopposed(karlyn) and Engraved(karlyn) -> Tawny(karlyn)\nforall x (Tawny(x) -> Engraved(x))\n\nBearish(sindee)\n\nTawny(sindee) and forall x (Tawny(x) -> Engraved(x)) -> therefore Engraved(sindee) Engraved(sindee) and forall x (Engraved(x) -> Bearish(x)) -> therefore Bearish(sindee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Olivier is knobby. Olivier is wholemeal. Olivier is unbridled. Olivier is limited. Verile is not combative. Verile is cruel. Verile is wholemeal. Verile is unbridled. Faye is not mensal. Marla is unbridled. All combative things are cruel. If Verile is knobby and Verile is combative then Verile is limited. All limited things are combative. Olivier is not cruel.", "logic": "\nKnobby(olivier)\nWholemeal(olivier)\nUnbridled(olivier)\nLimited(olivier)\nnot Combative(verile)\nCruel(verile)\nWholemeal(verile)\nUnbridled(verile)\nnot Mensal(faye)\nUnbridled(marla)\nforall x (Combative(x) -> Cruel(x))\nKnobby(verile) and Combative(verile) -> Limited(verile)\nforall x (Limited(x) -> Combative(x))\n\nnot Cruel(olivier)\n\nLimited(olivier) and forall x (Limited(x) -> Combative(x)) -> therefore Combative(olivier) Combative(olivier) and forall x (Combative(x) -> Cruel(x)) -> therefore Cruel(olivier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Nels is untethered. Nels is available. Nels is leptorhine. Nels is advisable. Lucinda is not carmelite. Lucinda is avid. Lucinda is available. Lucinda is leptorhine. Betti is not guardant. Ophelia is leptorhine. All carmelite things are avid. If Lucinda is untethered and Lucinda is carmelite then Lucinda is advisable. All advisable things are carmelite. Ophelia is not carmelite.", "logic": "\nUntethered(nels)\nAvailable(nels)\nLeptorhine(nels)\nAdvisable(nels)\nnot Carmelite(lucinda)\nAvid(lucinda)\nAvailable(lucinda)\nLeptorhine(lucinda)\nnot Guardant(betti)\nLeptorhine(ophelia)\nforall x (Carmelite(x) -> Avid(x))\nUntethered(lucinda) and Carmelite(lucinda) -> Advisable(lucinda)\nforall x (Advisable(x) -> Carmelite(x))\n\nnot Carmelite(ophelia)\n\nforall x (Advisable(x) -> Carmelite(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Moyra is depleted. Moyra is unbitter. Moyra is thirdhand. Moyra is vulval. Andreas is not inflated. Andreas is trillionth. Andreas is unbitter. Andreas is thirdhand. Cornie is not laboring. Somerset is thirdhand. All inflated things are trillionth. If Andreas is depleted and Andreas is inflated then Andreas is vulval. All vulval things are inflated. Andreas is vulval.", "logic": "\nDepleted(moyra)\nUnbitter(moyra)\nThirdhand(moyra)\nVulval(moyra)\nnot Inflated(andreas)\nTrillionth(andreas)\nUnbitter(andreas)\nThirdhand(andreas)\nnot Laboring(cornie)\nThirdhand(somerset)\nforall x (Inflated(x) -> Trillionth(x))\nDepleted(andreas) and Inflated(andreas) -> Vulval(andreas)\nforall x (Vulval(x) -> Inflated(x))\n\nVulval(andreas)\n\nDepleted(andreas) and Inflated(andreas) -> Vulval(andreas) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Sarita is tributary. Sarita is tenfold. Sarita is bellyless. Sarita is unheated. Osbourne is not ankylotic. Osbourne is lacustrine. Osbourne is tenfold. Osbourne is bellyless. Willetta is not adrift. Marylin is bellyless. All ankylotic things are lacustrine. If Osbourne is tributary and Osbourne is ankylotic then Osbourne is unheated. All unheated things are ankylotic. Marylin is not lacustrine.", "logic": "\nTributary(sarita)\nTenfold(sarita)\nBellyless(sarita)\nUnheated(sarita)\nnot Ankylotic(osbourne)\nLacustrine(osbourne)\nTenfold(osbourne)\nBellyless(osbourne)\nnot Adrift(willetta)\nBellyless(marylin)\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Lacustrine(x))\nTributary(osbourne) and Ankylotic(osbourne) -> Unheated(osbourne)\nforall x (Unheated(x) -> Ankylotic(x))\n\nnot Lacustrine(marylin)\n\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) -> Lacustrine(x)) <- forall x (Unheated(x) -> Ankylotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Sibella is dietary. Sibella is flaky. Sibella is tigerish. Sibella is anaglyphic. Ivie is not vengeful. Ivie is inaccurate. Ivie is flaky. Ivie is tigerish. Mersey is not buffoonish. Bathsheba is tigerish. All vengeful things are inaccurate. If Ivie is dietary and Ivie is vengeful then Ivie is anaglyphic. All anaglyphic things are vengeful. Bathsheba is buffoonish.", "logic": "\nDietary(sibella)\nFlaky(sibella)\nTigerish(sibella)\nAnaglyphic(sibella)\nnot Vengeful(ivie)\nInaccurate(ivie)\nFlaky(ivie)\nTigerish(ivie)\nnot Buffoonish(mersey)\nTigerish(bathsheba)\nforall x (Vengeful(x) -> Inaccurate(x))\nDietary(ivie) and Vengeful(ivie) -> Anaglyphic(ivie)\nforall x (Anaglyphic(x) -> Vengeful(x))\n\nBuffoonish(bathsheba)\n\nBuffoonish(bathsheba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Paulie is metonymic. Paulie is electronic. Paulie is remedial. Paulie is lymphoid. Hartwell is not clausal. Hartwell is neolithic. Hartwell is electronic. Hartwell is remedial. Lani is not discalced. Clayborne is remedial. All clausal things are neolithic. If Hartwell is metonymic and Hartwell is clausal then Hartwell is lymphoid. All lymphoid things are clausal. Lani is not metonymic.", "logic": "\nMetonymic(paulie)\nElectronic(paulie)\nRemedial(paulie)\nLymphoid(paulie)\nnot Clausal(hartwell)\nNeolithic(hartwell)\nElectronic(hartwell)\nRemedial(hartwell)\nnot Discalced(lani)\nRemedial(clayborne)\nforall x (Clausal(x) -> Neolithic(x))\nMetonymic(hartwell) and Clausal(hartwell) -> Lymphoid(hartwell)\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Clausal(x))\n\nnot Metonymic(lani)\n\nnot Metonymic(lani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Cammi is foolhardy. Cammi is lentissimo. Cammi is skinned. Cammi is emotional. Wilona is not weathered. Wilona is unfearing. Wilona is lentissimo. Wilona is skinned. Willyt is not sumptuous. Prent is skinned. All weathered things are unfearing. If Wilona is foolhardy and Wilona is weathered then Wilona is emotional. All emotional things are weathered. Wilona is foolhardy.", "logic": "\nFoolhardy(cammi)\nLentissimo(cammi)\nSkinned(cammi)\nEmotional(cammi)\nnot Weathered(wilona)\nUnfearing(wilona)\nLentissimo(wilona)\nSkinned(wilona)\nnot Sumptuous(willyt)\nSkinned(prent)\nforall x (Weathered(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nFoolhardy(wilona) and Weathered(wilona) -> Emotional(wilona)\nforall x (Emotional(x) -> Weathered(x))\n\nFoolhardy(wilona)\n\nFoolhardy(wilona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-673"} {"premises": "Allah is embodied. Young people are italic. If someone is plane and italic then they are bankrupt. All isthmian people are somali. All isthmian, spheroidal people are somali. If someone is somali and plane then they are embodied. Nice people are italic. If someone is bankrupt then they are isthmian. Furry people are spheroidal. Allah is embodied.", "logic": "\nEmbodied(allah)\nforall x (Somali(x) -> Italic(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) and Italic(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nforall x (Isthmian(x) -> Somali(x))\nforall x (Isthmian(x) and Spheroidal(x) -> Somali(x))\nforall x (Somali(x) and Plane(x) -> Embodied(x))\nforall x (Plane(x) -> Italic(x))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nforall x (Italic(x) -> Spheroidal(x))\n\nEmbodied(allah)\n\ntherefore Embodied(allah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6115"} {"premises": "Barri is remiss. Young people are pietistic. If someone is trendy and pietistic then they are tinkling. All operatic people are corporate. All operatic, synchronal people are corporate. If someone is corporate and trendy then they are remiss. Nice people are pietistic. If someone is tinkling then they are operatic. Furry people are synchronal. Barri is not remiss.", "logic": "\nRemiss(barri)\nforall x (Corporate(x) -> Pietistic(x))\nforall x (Trendy(x) and Pietistic(x) -> Tinkling(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) -> Corporate(x))\nforall x (Operatic(x) and Synchronal(x) -> Corporate(x))\nforall x (Corporate(x) and Trendy(x) -> Remiss(x))\nforall x (Trendy(x) -> Pietistic(x))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Operatic(x))\nforall x (Pietistic(x) -> Synchronal(x))\n\nnot Remiss(barri)\n\ntherefore Remiss(barri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6115"} {"premises": "Emeline is careless. Young people are unwaxed. If someone is unlivable and unwaxed then they are lxvi. All deweyan people are stimulant. All deweyan, craved people are stimulant. If someone is stimulant and unlivable then they are careless. Nice people are unwaxed. If someone is lxvi then they are deweyan. Furry people are craved. Emeline is not stimulant.", "logic": "\nCareless(emeline)\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> Unwaxed(x))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Unwaxed(x) -> Lxvi(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) and Craved(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nforall x (Stimulant(x) and Unlivable(x) -> Careless(x))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) -> Unwaxed(x))\nforall x (Lxvi(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Unwaxed(x) -> Craved(x))\n\nnot Stimulant(emeline)\n\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Stimulant(x)) <- forall x (Lxvi(x) -> Deweyan(x)) <- forall x (Unlivable(x) and Unwaxed(x) -> Lxvi(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6115"} {"premises": "Deana is epicurean. Young people are bubonic. If someone is ministrant and bubonic then they are cambodian. All mannish people are delusory. All mannish, rending people are delusory. If someone is delusory and ministrant then they are epicurean. Nice people are bubonic. If someone is cambodian then they are mannish. Furry people are rending. Deana is ministrant.", "logic": "\nEpicurean(deana)\nforall x (Delusory(x) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Ministrant(x) and Bubonic(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Mannish(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Mannish(x) and Rending(x) -> Delusory(x))\nforall x (Delusory(x) and Ministrant(x) -> Epicurean(x))\nforall x (Ministrant(x) -> Bubonic(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) -> Mannish(x))\nforall x (Bubonic(x) -> Rending(x))\n\nMinistrant(deana)\n\nMinistrant(deana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-6115"} {"premises": "Kerrin is indecorous. Kerrin is dynastic. Bernetta is dynastic. Bernetta is meshugge. Bernetta is linked. Bernetta is nearby. Sapphire is dynastic. Sapphire is polynomial. Sapphire is nearby. Nicoli is indecorous. Nicoli is wondering. Nicoli is dynastic. Nicoli is polynomial. Nicoli is meshugge. Nicoli is linked. Nicoli is nearby. Blue things are linked. If Sapphire is dynastic then Sapphire is polynomial. If something is dynastic then it is nearby. All nearby, polynomial things are meshugge. If something is nearby and indecorous then it is polynomial. If something is linked then it is nearby. Kerrin is indecorous.", "logic": "\nIndecorous(kerrin)\nDynastic(kerrin)\nDynastic(bernetta)\nMeshugge(bernetta)\nLinked(bernetta)\nNearby(bernetta)\nDynastic(sapphire)\nPolynomial(sapphire)\nNearby(sapphire)\nIndecorous(nicoli)\nWondering(nicoli)\nDynastic(nicoli)\nPolynomial(nicoli)\nMeshugge(nicoli)\nLinked(nicoli)\nNearby(nicoli)\nforall x (Indecorous(x) -> Linked(x))\nDynastic(sapphire) -> Polynomial(sapphire)\nforall x (Dynastic(x) -> Nearby(x))\nforall x (Nearby(x) and Polynomial(x) -> Meshugge(x))\nforall x (Nearby(x) and Indecorous(x) -> Polynomial(x))\nforall x (Linked(x) -> Nearby(x))\n\nIndecorous(kerrin)\n\ntherefore Indecorous(kerrin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Elwira is polluted. Elwira is receptive. Charis is receptive. Charis is sear. Charis is drippy. Charis is monoatomic. Gertruda is receptive. Gertruda is perfidious. Gertruda is monoatomic. Seth is polluted. Seth is extra. Seth is receptive. Seth is perfidious. Seth is sear. Seth is drippy. Seth is monoatomic. Blue things are drippy. If Gertruda is receptive then Gertruda is perfidious. If something is receptive then it is monoatomic. All monoatomic, perfidious things are sear. If something is monoatomic and polluted then it is perfidious. If something is drippy then it is monoatomic. Seth is not extra.", "logic": "\nPolluted(elwira)\nReceptive(elwira)\nReceptive(charis)\nSear(charis)\nDrippy(charis)\nMonoatomic(charis)\nReceptive(gertruda)\nPerfidious(gertruda)\nMonoatomic(gertruda)\nPolluted(seth)\nExtra(seth)\nReceptive(seth)\nPerfidious(seth)\nSear(seth)\nDrippy(seth)\nMonoatomic(seth)\nforall x (Polluted(x) -> Drippy(x))\nReceptive(gertruda) -> Perfidious(gertruda)\nforall x (Receptive(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) and Perfidious(x) -> Sear(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) and Polluted(x) -> Perfidious(x))\nforall x (Drippy(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\n\nnot Extra(seth)\n\ntherefore Extra(seth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Ignaz is deniable. Ignaz is tutelar. Caria is tutelar. Caria is quadratic. Caria is sanguine. Caria is unjointed. Ariela is tutelar. Ariela is seamed. Ariela is unjointed. Raven is deniable. Raven is serial. Raven is tutelar. Raven is seamed. Raven is quadratic. Raven is sanguine. Raven is unjointed. Blue things are sanguine. If Ariela is tutelar then Ariela is seamed. If something is tutelar then it is unjointed. All unjointed, seamed things are quadratic. If something is unjointed and deniable then it is seamed. If something is sanguine then it is unjointed. Ignaz is sanguine.", "logic": "\nDeniable(ignaz)\nTutelar(ignaz)\nTutelar(caria)\nQuadratic(caria)\nSanguine(caria)\nUnjointed(caria)\nTutelar(ariela)\nSeamed(ariela)\nUnjointed(ariela)\nDeniable(raven)\nSerial(raven)\nTutelar(raven)\nSeamed(raven)\nQuadratic(raven)\nSanguine(raven)\nUnjointed(raven)\nforall x (Deniable(x) -> Sanguine(x))\nTutelar(ariela) -> Seamed(ariela)\nforall x (Tutelar(x) -> Unjointed(x))\nforall x (Unjointed(x) and Seamed(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Unjointed(x) and Deniable(x) -> Seamed(x))\nforall x (Sanguine(x) -> Unjointed(x))\n\nSanguine(ignaz)\n\nDeniable(ignaz) and forall x (Deniable(x) -> Sanguine(x)) -> therefore Sanguine(ignaz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Caroleen is soupy. Caroleen is cypriot. Laure is cypriot. Laure is muddied. Laure is antennal. Laure is ravening. Leonie is cypriot. Leonie is anodyne. Leonie is ravening. Davy is soupy. Davy is nonsense. Davy is cypriot. Davy is anodyne. Davy is muddied. Davy is antennal. Davy is ravening. Blue things are antennal. If Leonie is cypriot then Leonie is anodyne. If something is cypriot then it is ravening. All ravening, anodyne things are muddied. If something is ravening and soupy then it is anodyne. If something is antennal then it is ravening. Caroleen is not antennal.", "logic": "\nSoupy(caroleen)\nCypriot(caroleen)\nCypriot(laure)\nMuddied(laure)\nAntennal(laure)\nRavening(laure)\nCypriot(leonie)\nAnodyne(leonie)\nRavening(leonie)\nSoupy(davy)\nNonsense(davy)\nCypriot(davy)\nAnodyne(davy)\nMuddied(davy)\nAntennal(davy)\nRavening(davy)\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Antennal(x))\nCypriot(leonie) -> Anodyne(leonie)\nforall x (Cypriot(x) -> Ravening(x))\nforall x (Ravening(x) and Anodyne(x) -> Muddied(x))\nforall x (Ravening(x) and Soupy(x) -> Anodyne(x))\nforall x (Antennal(x) -> Ravening(x))\n\nnot Antennal(caroleen)\n\nSoupy(caroleen) and forall x (Soupy(x) -> Antennal(x)) -> therefore Antennal(caroleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Anneliese is pretty. Anneliese is dastardly. Elna is dastardly. Elna is zambian. Elna is mortified. Elna is phenotypic. Doralia is dastardly. Doralia is genial. Doralia is phenotypic. Everard is pretty. Everard is budgetary. Everard is dastardly. Everard is genial. Everard is zambian. Everard is mortified. Everard is phenotypic. Blue things are mortified. If Doralia is dastardly then Doralia is genial. If something is dastardly then it is phenotypic. All phenotypic, genial things are zambian. If something is phenotypic and pretty then it is genial. If something is mortified then it is phenotypic. Anneliese is genial.", "logic": "\nPretty(anneliese)\nDastardly(anneliese)\nDastardly(elna)\nZambian(elna)\nMortified(elna)\nPhenotypic(elna)\nDastardly(doralia)\nGenial(doralia)\nPhenotypic(doralia)\nPretty(everard)\nBudgetary(everard)\nDastardly(everard)\nGenial(everard)\nZambian(everard)\nMortified(everard)\nPhenotypic(everard)\nforall x (Pretty(x) -> Mortified(x))\nDastardly(doralia) -> Genial(doralia)\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Phenotypic(x))\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) and Genial(x) -> Zambian(x))\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) and Pretty(x) -> Genial(x))\nforall x (Mortified(x) -> Phenotypic(x))\n\nGenial(anneliese)\n\nDastardly(anneliese) and forall x (Dastardly(x) -> Phenotypic(x)) -> therefore Phenotypic(anneliese) Phenotypic(anneliese) and Pretty(anneliese) and forall x (Phenotypic(x) and Pretty(x) -> Genial(x)) -> therefore Genial(anneliese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Farley is antheral. Farley is occlusive. Chaddie is occlusive. Chaddie is caring. Chaddie is efficient. Chaddie is wholesome. Barri is occlusive. Barri is half. Barri is wholesome. Lizzy is antheral. Lizzy is fortuitous. Lizzy is occlusive. Lizzy is half. Lizzy is caring. Lizzy is efficient. Lizzy is wholesome. Blue things are efficient. If Barri is occlusive then Barri is half. If something is occlusive then it is wholesome. All wholesome, half things are caring. If something is wholesome and antheral then it is half. If something is efficient then it is wholesome. Farley is not half.", "logic": "\nAntheral(farley)\nOcclusive(farley)\nOcclusive(chaddie)\nCaring(chaddie)\nEfficient(chaddie)\nWholesome(chaddie)\nOcclusive(barri)\nHalf(barri)\nWholesome(barri)\nAntheral(lizzy)\nFortuitous(lizzy)\nOcclusive(lizzy)\nHalf(lizzy)\nCaring(lizzy)\nEfficient(lizzy)\nWholesome(lizzy)\nforall x (Antheral(x) -> Efficient(x))\nOcclusive(barri) -> Half(barri)\nforall x (Occlusive(x) -> Wholesome(x))\nforall x (Wholesome(x) and Half(x) -> Caring(x))\nforall x (Wholesome(x) and Antheral(x) -> Half(x))\nforall x (Efficient(x) -> Wholesome(x))\n\nnot Half(farley)\n\nOcclusive(farley) and forall x (Occlusive(x) -> Wholesome(x)) -> therefore Wholesome(farley) Wholesome(farley) and Antheral(farley) and forall x (Wholesome(x) and Antheral(x) -> Half(x)) -> therefore Half(farley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Carol is saudi. Carol is ascitic. Alidia is ascitic. Alidia is alary. Alidia is elapsed. Alidia is upbeat. Henrietta is ascitic. Henrietta is homostyled. Henrietta is upbeat. Rafe is saudi. Rafe is speckless. Rafe is ascitic. Rafe is homostyled. Rafe is alary. Rafe is elapsed. Rafe is upbeat. Blue things are elapsed. If Henrietta is ascitic then Henrietta is homostyled. If something is ascitic then it is upbeat. All upbeat, homostyled things are alary. If something is upbeat and saudi then it is homostyled. If something is elapsed then it is upbeat. Carol is alary.", "logic": "\nSaudi(carol)\nAscitic(carol)\nAscitic(alidia)\nAlary(alidia)\nElapsed(alidia)\nUpbeat(alidia)\nAscitic(henrietta)\nHomostyled(henrietta)\nUpbeat(henrietta)\nSaudi(rafe)\nSpeckless(rafe)\nAscitic(rafe)\nHomostyled(rafe)\nAlary(rafe)\nElapsed(rafe)\nUpbeat(rafe)\nforall x (Saudi(x) -> Elapsed(x))\nAscitic(henrietta) -> Homostyled(henrietta)\nforall x (Ascitic(x) -> Upbeat(x))\nforall x (Upbeat(x) and Homostyled(x) -> Alary(x))\nforall x (Upbeat(x) and Saudi(x) -> Homostyled(x))\nforall x (Elapsed(x) -> Upbeat(x))\n\nAlary(carol)\n\nAscitic(carol) and forall x (Ascitic(x) -> Upbeat(x)) -> therefore Upbeat(carol) Ascitic(carol) and forall x (Ascitic(x) -> Upbeat(x)) -> therefore Upbeat(carol) Upbeat(carol) and Saudi(carol) and forall x (Upbeat(x) and Saudi(x) -> Homostyled(x)) -> therefore Homostyled(carol) Upbeat(carol) and Homostyled(carol) and forall x (Upbeat(x) and Homostyled(x) -> Alary(x)) -> therefore Alary(carol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Lawson is asthmatic. Lawson is ecumenic. Harrie is ecumenic. Harrie is contralto. Harrie is multiphase. Harrie is unhindered. Levon is ecumenic. Levon is informed. Levon is unhindered. Seline is asthmatic. Seline is advisory. Seline is ecumenic. Seline is informed. Seline is contralto. Seline is multiphase. Seline is unhindered. Blue things are multiphase. If Levon is ecumenic then Levon is informed. If something is ecumenic then it is unhindered. All unhindered, informed things are contralto. If something is unhindered and asthmatic then it is informed. If something is multiphase then it is unhindered. Lawson is not contralto.", "logic": "\nAsthmatic(lawson)\nEcumenic(lawson)\nEcumenic(harrie)\nContralto(harrie)\nMultiphase(harrie)\nUnhindered(harrie)\nEcumenic(levon)\nInformed(levon)\nUnhindered(levon)\nAsthmatic(seline)\nAdvisory(seline)\nEcumenic(seline)\nInformed(seline)\nContralto(seline)\nMultiphase(seline)\nUnhindered(seline)\nforall x (Asthmatic(x) -> Multiphase(x))\nEcumenic(levon) -> Informed(levon)\nforall x (Ecumenic(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and Informed(x) -> Contralto(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and Asthmatic(x) -> Informed(x))\nforall x (Multiphase(x) -> Unhindered(x))\n\nnot Contralto(lawson)\n\nEcumenic(lawson) and forall x (Ecumenic(x) -> Unhindered(x)) -> therefore Unhindered(lawson) Ecumenic(lawson) and forall x (Ecumenic(x) -> Unhindered(x)) -> therefore Unhindered(lawson) Unhindered(lawson) and Asthmatic(lawson) and forall x (Unhindered(x) and Asthmatic(x) -> Informed(x)) -> therefore Informed(lawson) Unhindered(lawson) and Informed(lawson) and forall x (Unhindered(x) and Informed(x) -> Contralto(x)) -> therefore Contralto(lawson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Saunder is uneasy. Saunder is illegible. Tedda is illegible. Tedda is bituminoid. Tedda is divorced. Tedda is sobersided. Ford is illegible. Ford is polemic. Ford is sobersided. Willmott is uneasy. Willmott is leafless. Willmott is illegible. Willmott is polemic. Willmott is bituminoid. Willmott is divorced. Willmott is sobersided. Blue things are divorced. If Ford is illegible then Ford is polemic. If something is illegible then it is sobersided. All sobersided, polemic things are bituminoid. If something is sobersided and uneasy then it is polemic. If something is divorced then it is sobersided. Ford is not divorced.", "logic": "\nUneasy(saunder)\nIllegible(saunder)\nIllegible(tedda)\nBituminoid(tedda)\nDivorced(tedda)\nSobersided(tedda)\nIllegible(ford)\nPolemic(ford)\nSobersided(ford)\nUneasy(willmott)\nLeafless(willmott)\nIllegible(willmott)\nPolemic(willmott)\nBituminoid(willmott)\nDivorced(willmott)\nSobersided(willmott)\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Divorced(x))\nIllegible(ford) -> Polemic(ford)\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> Sobersided(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) and Polemic(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Sobersided(x) and Uneasy(x) -> Polemic(x))\nforall x (Divorced(x) -> Sobersided(x))\n\nnot Divorced(ford)\n\nforall x (Uneasy(x) -> Divorced(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Thurstan is esoteric. Thurstan is true. Chrissie is true. Chrissie is katabolic. Chrissie is fanged. Chrissie is senegalese. Tonya is true. Tonya is prototypal. Tonya is senegalese. Antonin is esoteric. Antonin is prognathic. Antonin is true. Antonin is prototypal. Antonin is katabolic. Antonin is fanged. Antonin is senegalese. Blue things are fanged. If Tonya is true then Tonya is prototypal. If something is true then it is senegalese. All senegalese, prototypal things are katabolic. If something is senegalese and esoteric then it is prototypal. If something is fanged then it is senegalese. Chrissie is prototypal.", "logic": "\nEsoteric(thurstan)\nTrue(thurstan)\nTrue(chrissie)\nKatabolic(chrissie)\nFanged(chrissie)\nSenegalese(chrissie)\nTrue(tonya)\nPrototypal(tonya)\nSenegalese(tonya)\nEsoteric(antonin)\nPrognathic(antonin)\nTrue(antonin)\nPrototypal(antonin)\nKatabolic(antonin)\nFanged(antonin)\nSenegalese(antonin)\nforall x (Esoteric(x) -> Fanged(x))\nTrue(tonya) -> Prototypal(tonya)\nforall x (True(x) -> Senegalese(x))\nforall x (Senegalese(x) and Prototypal(x) -> Katabolic(x))\nforall x (Senegalese(x) and Esoteric(x) -> Prototypal(x))\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Senegalese(x))\n\nPrototypal(chrissie)\n\nforall x (Senegalese(x) and Esoteric(x) -> Prototypal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Elvin is swiss. Elvin is unflavored. Emmet is unflavored. Emmet is unhampered. Emmet is despised. Emmet is endearing. Adela is unflavored. Adela is unseamed. Adela is endearing. Dedie is swiss. Dedie is tinny. Dedie is unflavored. Dedie is unseamed. Dedie is unhampered. Dedie is despised. Dedie is endearing. Blue things are despised. If Adela is unflavored then Adela is unseamed. If something is unflavored then it is endearing. All endearing, unseamed things are unhampered. If something is endearing and swiss then it is unseamed. If something is despised then it is endearing. Adela is not swiss.", "logic": "\nSwiss(elvin)\nUnflavored(elvin)\nUnflavored(emmet)\nUnhampered(emmet)\nDespised(emmet)\nEndearing(emmet)\nUnflavored(adela)\nUnseamed(adela)\nEndearing(adela)\nSwiss(dedie)\nTinny(dedie)\nUnflavored(dedie)\nUnseamed(dedie)\nUnhampered(dedie)\nDespised(dedie)\nEndearing(dedie)\nforall x (Swiss(x) -> Despised(x))\nUnflavored(adela) -> Unseamed(adela)\nforall x (Unflavored(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Endearing(x) and Unseamed(x) -> Unhampered(x))\nforall x (Endearing(x) and Swiss(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Despised(x) -> Endearing(x))\n\nnot Swiss(adela)\n\nnot Swiss(adela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Belvia is exegetic. Belvia is blastular. Bell is blastular. Bell is atlantic. Bell is portrayed. Bell is calyptrate. Cleva is blastular. Cleva is precarious. Cleva is calyptrate. Arline is exegetic. Arline is avenged. Arline is blastular. Arline is precarious. Arline is atlantic. Arline is portrayed. Arline is calyptrate. Blue things are portrayed. If Cleva is blastular then Cleva is precarious. If something is blastular then it is calyptrate. All calyptrate, precarious things are atlantic. If something is calyptrate and exegetic then it is precarious. If something is portrayed then it is calyptrate. Bell is exegetic.", "logic": "\nExegetic(belvia)\nBlastular(belvia)\nBlastular(bell)\nAtlantic(bell)\nPortrayed(bell)\nCalyptrate(bell)\nBlastular(cleva)\nPrecarious(cleva)\nCalyptrate(cleva)\nExegetic(arline)\nAvenged(arline)\nBlastular(arline)\nPrecarious(arline)\nAtlantic(arline)\nPortrayed(arline)\nCalyptrate(arline)\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Portrayed(x))\nBlastular(cleva) -> Precarious(cleva)\nforall x (Blastular(x) -> Calyptrate(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) and Precarious(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Calyptrate(x) and Exegetic(x) -> Precarious(x))\nforall x (Portrayed(x) -> Calyptrate(x))\n\nExegetic(bell)\n\nExegetic(bell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Cristal is curricular. Cristal is merited. Linnell is merited. Linnell is hittite. Linnell is carbonyl. Linnell is pensive. Chris is merited. Chris is wired. Chris is pensive. Reese is curricular. Reese is implicated. Reese is merited. Reese is wired. Reese is hittite. Reese is carbonyl. Reese is pensive. Blue things are carbonyl. If Chris is merited then Chris is wired. If something is merited then it is pensive. All pensive, wired things are hittite. If something is pensive and curricular then it is wired. If something is carbonyl then it is pensive. Linnell is not implicated.", "logic": "\nCurricular(cristal)\nMerited(cristal)\nMerited(linnell)\nHittite(linnell)\nCarbonyl(linnell)\nPensive(linnell)\nMerited(chris)\nWired(chris)\nPensive(chris)\nCurricular(reese)\nImplicated(reese)\nMerited(reese)\nWired(reese)\nHittite(reese)\nCarbonyl(reese)\nPensive(reese)\nforall x (Curricular(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\nMerited(chris) -> Wired(chris)\nforall x (Merited(x) -> Pensive(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Wired(x) -> Hittite(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Curricular(x) -> Wired(x))\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) -> Pensive(x))\n\nnot Implicated(linnell)\n\nnot Implicated(linnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Gabi is geothermic. Gabi is ringleted. Kimberlyn is ringleted. Kimberlyn is donnian. Kimberlyn is blanketed. Kimberlyn is punished. Giorgia is ringleted. Giorgia is solitary. Giorgia is punished. Sigfrid is geothermic. Sigfrid is damaged. Sigfrid is ringleted. Sigfrid is solitary. Sigfrid is donnian. Sigfrid is blanketed. Sigfrid is punished. Blue things are blanketed. If Giorgia is ringleted then Giorgia is solitary. If something is ringleted then it is punished. All punished, solitary things are donnian. If something is punished and geothermic then it is solitary. If something is blanketed then it is punished. Giorgia is damaged.", "logic": "\nGeothermic(gabi)\nRingleted(gabi)\nRingleted(kimberlyn)\nDonnian(kimberlyn)\nBlanketed(kimberlyn)\nPunished(kimberlyn)\nRingleted(giorgia)\nSolitary(giorgia)\nPunished(giorgia)\nGeothermic(sigfrid)\nDamaged(sigfrid)\nRingleted(sigfrid)\nSolitary(sigfrid)\nDonnian(sigfrid)\nBlanketed(sigfrid)\nPunished(sigfrid)\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Blanketed(x))\nRingleted(giorgia) -> Solitary(giorgia)\nforall x (Ringleted(x) -> Punished(x))\nforall x (Punished(x) and Solitary(x) -> Donnian(x))\nforall x (Punished(x) and Geothermic(x) -> Solitary(x))\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> Punished(x))\n\nDamaged(giorgia)\n\nDamaged(giorgia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-821"} {"premises": "Jacki is revertible. Jacki is protrusile. Bret is monoclinal. Bret is unbarred. Mora is emotive. Mora is not protrusile. Mora is unbarred. If Jacki is monoclinal and Jacki is revertible then Jacki is fell. If something is emotive and revertible then it is not coronary. All protrusile things are coronary. If something is unbarred and not protrusile then it is fell. All monoclinal things are emotive. Kind things are revertible. All unbarred, fell things are revertible. All monoclinal things are unbarred. Bret is monoclinal.", "logic": "\nRevertible(jacki)\nProtrusile(jacki)\nMonoclinal(bret)\nUnbarred(bret)\nEmotive(mora)\nnot Protrusile(mora)\nUnbarred(mora)\nMonoclinal(jacki) and Revertible(jacki) -> Fell(jacki)\nforall x (Emotive(x) and Revertible(x) -> not Coronary(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Coronary(x))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) and not Protrusile(x) -> Fell(x))\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) -> Emotive(x))\nforall x (Coronary(x) -> Revertible(x))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) and Fell(x) -> Revertible(x))\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) -> Unbarred(x))\n\nMonoclinal(bret)\n\ntherefore Monoclinal(bret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Rufe is rushlike. Rufe is hostile. Gillan is iridescent. Gillan is parrotlike. Jeanna is crude. Jeanna is not hostile. Jeanna is parrotlike. If Rufe is iridescent and Rufe is rushlike then Rufe is abominable. If something is crude and rushlike then it is not focussed. All hostile things are focussed. If something is parrotlike and not hostile then it is abominable. All iridescent things are crude. Kind things are rushlike. All parrotlike, abominable things are rushlike. All iridescent things are parrotlike. Rufe is not hostile.", "logic": "\nRushlike(rufe)\nHostile(rufe)\nIridescent(gillan)\nParrotlike(gillan)\nCrude(jeanna)\nnot Hostile(jeanna)\nParrotlike(jeanna)\nIridescent(rufe) and Rushlike(rufe) -> Abominable(rufe)\nforall x (Crude(x) and Rushlike(x) -> not Focussed(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Focussed(x))\nforall x (Parrotlike(x) and not Hostile(x) -> Abominable(x))\nforall x (Iridescent(x) -> Crude(x))\nforall x (Focussed(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Parrotlike(x) and Abominable(x) -> Rushlike(x))\nforall x (Iridescent(x) -> Parrotlike(x))\n\nnot Hostile(rufe)\n\ntherefore Hostile(rufe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Prunella is panegyric. Prunella is vermiform. Tracee is mishnaic. Tracee is capitate. Carmina is aglitter. Carmina is not vermiform. Carmina is capitate. If Prunella is mishnaic and Prunella is panegyric then Prunella is canned. If something is aglitter and panegyric then it is not epenthetic. All vermiform things are epenthetic. If something is capitate and not vermiform then it is canned. All mishnaic things are aglitter. Kind things are panegyric. All capitate, canned things are panegyric. All mishnaic things are capitate. Carmina is canned.", "logic": "\nPanegyric(prunella)\nVermiform(prunella)\nMishnaic(tracee)\nCapitate(tracee)\nAglitter(carmina)\nnot Vermiform(carmina)\nCapitate(carmina)\nMishnaic(prunella) and Panegyric(prunella) -> Canned(prunella)\nforall x (Aglitter(x) and Panegyric(x) -> not Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Capitate(x) and not Vermiform(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Aglitter(x))\nforall x (Epenthetic(x) -> Panegyric(x))\nforall x (Capitate(x) and Canned(x) -> Panegyric(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Capitate(x))\n\nCanned(carmina)\n\nCapitate(carmina) and not Vermiform(carmina) and forall x (Capitate(x) and not Vermiform(x) -> Canned(x)) -> therefore Canned(carmina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Mischa is protracted. Mischa is conjunct. Donica is hedonic. Donica is tyrannical. Eimile is twiglike. Eimile is not conjunct. Eimile is tyrannical. If Mischa is hedonic and Mischa is protracted then Mischa is dalmatian. If something is twiglike and protracted then it is not uneconomic. All conjunct things are uneconomic. If something is tyrannical and not conjunct then it is dalmatian. All hedonic things are twiglike. Kind things are protracted. All tyrannical, dalmatian things are protracted. All hedonic things are tyrannical. Mischa is not uneconomic.", "logic": "\nProtracted(mischa)\nConjunct(mischa)\nHedonic(donica)\nTyrannical(donica)\nTwiglike(eimile)\nnot Conjunct(eimile)\nTyrannical(eimile)\nHedonic(mischa) and Protracted(mischa) -> Dalmatian(mischa)\nforall x (Twiglike(x) and Protracted(x) -> not Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Conjunct(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Tyrannical(x) and not Conjunct(x) -> Dalmatian(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) -> Twiglike(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) -> Protracted(x))\nforall x (Tyrannical(x) and Dalmatian(x) -> Protracted(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) -> Tyrannical(x))\n\nnot Uneconomic(mischa)\n\nConjunct(mischa) and forall x (Conjunct(x) -> Uneconomic(x)) -> therefore Uneconomic(mischa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Kourtney is silent. Kourtney is noncurrent. Ervin is gustative. Ervin is viatical. Ansel is copious. Ansel is not noncurrent. Ansel is viatical. If Kourtney is gustative and Kourtney is silent then Kourtney is heretical. If something is copious and silent then it is not encircled. All noncurrent things are encircled. If something is viatical and not noncurrent then it is heretical. All gustative things are copious. Kind things are silent. All viatical, heretical things are silent. All gustative things are viatical. Ansel is silent.", "logic": "\nSilent(kourtney)\nNoncurrent(kourtney)\nGustative(ervin)\nViatical(ervin)\nCopious(ansel)\nnot Noncurrent(ansel)\nViatical(ansel)\nGustative(kourtney) and Silent(kourtney) -> Heretical(kourtney)\nforall x (Copious(x) and Silent(x) -> not Encircled(x))\nforall x (Noncurrent(x) -> Encircled(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) and not Noncurrent(x) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Gustative(x) -> Copious(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) -> Silent(x))\nforall x (Viatical(x) and Heretical(x) -> Silent(x))\nforall x (Gustative(x) -> Viatical(x))\n\nSilent(ansel)\n\nViatical(ansel) and not Noncurrent(ansel) and forall x (Viatical(x) and not Noncurrent(x) -> Heretical(x)) -> therefore Heretical(ansel) Viatical(ansel) and Heretical(ansel) and forall x (Viatical(x) and Heretical(x) -> Silent(x)) -> therefore Silent(ansel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Junina is localized. Junina is sluicing. Charlotte is tantrik. Charlotte is isotropous. Weylin is pinstriped. Weylin is not sluicing. Weylin is isotropous. If Junina is tantrik and Junina is localized then Junina is lxxxvii. If something is pinstriped and localized then it is not deathless. All sluicing things are deathless. If something is isotropous and not sluicing then it is lxxxvii. All tantrik things are pinstriped. Kind things are localized. All isotropous, lxxxvii things are localized. All tantrik things are isotropous. Weylin is not localized.", "logic": "\nLocalized(junina)\nSluicing(junina)\nTantrik(charlotte)\nIsotropous(charlotte)\nPinstriped(weylin)\nnot Sluicing(weylin)\nIsotropous(weylin)\nTantrik(junina) and Localized(junina) -> Lxxxvii(junina)\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) and Localized(x) -> not Deathless(x))\nforall x (Sluicing(x) -> Deathless(x))\nforall x (Isotropous(x) and not Sluicing(x) -> Lxxxvii(x))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) -> Pinstriped(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Isotropous(x) and Lxxxvii(x) -> Localized(x))\nforall x (Tantrik(x) -> Isotropous(x))\n\nnot Localized(weylin)\n\nIsotropous(weylin) and not Sluicing(weylin) and forall x (Isotropous(x) and not Sluicing(x) -> Lxxxvii(x)) -> therefore Lxxxvii(weylin) Isotropous(weylin) and Lxxxvii(weylin) and forall x (Isotropous(x) and Lxxxvii(x) -> Localized(x)) -> therefore Localized(weylin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Meggan is bellying. Meggan is pustulate. Caralie is asyndetic. Caralie is infected. Robbin is thronged. Robbin is not pustulate. Robbin is infected. If Meggan is asyndetic and Meggan is bellying then Meggan is posterior. If something is thronged and bellying then it is not avifaunal. All pustulate things are avifaunal. If something is infected and not pustulate then it is posterior. All asyndetic things are thronged. Kind things are bellying. All infected, posterior things are bellying. All asyndetic things are infected. Robbin is not avifaunal.", "logic": "\nBellying(meggan)\nPustulate(meggan)\nAsyndetic(caralie)\nInfected(caralie)\nThronged(robbin)\nnot Pustulate(robbin)\nInfected(robbin)\nAsyndetic(meggan) and Bellying(meggan) -> Posterior(meggan)\nforall x (Thronged(x) and Bellying(x) -> not Avifaunal(x))\nforall x (Pustulate(x) -> Avifaunal(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) and not Pustulate(x) -> Posterior(x))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Thronged(x))\nforall x (Avifaunal(x) -> Bellying(x))\nforall x (Infected(x) and Posterior(x) -> Bellying(x))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) -> Infected(x))\n\nnot Avifaunal(robbin)\n\nInfected(robbin) and not Pustulate(robbin) and forall x (Infected(x) and not Pustulate(x) -> Posterior(x)) -> therefore Posterior(robbin) Infected(robbin) and Posterior(robbin) and forall x (Infected(x) and Posterior(x) -> Bellying(x)) -> therefore Bellying(robbin) Thronged(robbin) and Bellying(robbin) and forall x (Thronged(x) and Bellying(x) -> not Avifaunal(x)) -> therefore not Avifaunal(robbin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Heidi is worldly. Heidi is lustrous. Georgena is murmuring. Georgena is pensive. Madelon is aecial. Madelon is not lustrous. Madelon is pensive. If Heidi is murmuring and Heidi is worldly then Heidi is foppish. If something is aecial and worldly then it is not lightproof. All lustrous things are lightproof. If something is pensive and not lustrous then it is foppish. All murmuring things are aecial. Kind things are worldly. All pensive, foppish things are worldly. All murmuring things are pensive. Madelon is lightproof.", "logic": "\nWorldly(heidi)\nLustrous(heidi)\nMurmuring(georgena)\nPensive(georgena)\nAecial(madelon)\nnot Lustrous(madelon)\nPensive(madelon)\nMurmuring(heidi) and Worldly(heidi) -> Foppish(heidi)\nforall x (Aecial(x) and Worldly(x) -> not Lightproof(x))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Lightproof(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) and not Lustrous(x) -> Foppish(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) -> Aecial(x))\nforall x (Lightproof(x) -> Worldly(x))\nforall x (Pensive(x) and Foppish(x) -> Worldly(x))\nforall x (Murmuring(x) -> Pensive(x))\n\nLightproof(madelon)\n\nPensive(madelon) and not Lustrous(madelon) and forall x (Pensive(x) and not Lustrous(x) -> Foppish(x)) -> therefore Foppish(madelon) Pensive(madelon) and Foppish(madelon) and forall x (Pensive(x) and Foppish(x) -> Worldly(x)) -> therefore Worldly(madelon) Aecial(madelon) and Worldly(madelon) and forall x (Aecial(x) and Worldly(x) -> not Lightproof(x)) -> therefore not Lightproof(madelon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Stormy is anapaestic. Stormy is missional. Thia is monitory. Thia is earlier. Adaline is exulting. Adaline is not missional. Adaline is earlier. If Stormy is monitory and Stormy is anapaestic then Stormy is cheeky. If something is exulting and anapaestic then it is not hierarchic. All missional things are hierarchic. If something is earlier and not missional then it is cheeky. All monitory things are exulting. Kind things are anapaestic. All earlier, cheeky things are anapaestic. All monitory things are earlier. Stormy is not exulting.", "logic": "\nAnapaestic(stormy)\nMissional(stormy)\nMonitory(thia)\nEarlier(thia)\nExulting(adaline)\nnot Missional(adaline)\nEarlier(adaline)\nMonitory(stormy) and Anapaestic(stormy) -> Cheeky(stormy)\nforall x (Exulting(x) and Anapaestic(x) -> not Hierarchic(x))\nforall x (Missional(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) and not Missional(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Monitory(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Earlier(x) and Cheeky(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Monitory(x) -> Earlier(x))\n\nnot Exulting(stormy)\n\nforall x (Monitory(x) -> Exulting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Lavina is paroicous. Lavina is uncapped. Baily is corrupt. Baily is downstairs. Leia is sharing. Leia is not uncapped. Leia is downstairs. If Lavina is corrupt and Lavina is paroicous then Lavina is prompt. If something is sharing and paroicous then it is not balconied. All uncapped things are balconied. If something is downstairs and not uncapped then it is prompt. All corrupt things are sharing. Kind things are paroicous. All downstairs, prompt things are paroicous. All corrupt things are downstairs. Baily is paroicous.", "logic": "\nParoicous(lavina)\nUncapped(lavina)\nCorrupt(baily)\nDownstairs(baily)\nSharing(leia)\nnot Uncapped(leia)\nDownstairs(leia)\nCorrupt(lavina) and Paroicous(lavina) -> Prompt(lavina)\nforall x (Sharing(x) and Paroicous(x) -> not Balconied(x))\nforall x (Uncapped(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Downstairs(x) and not Uncapped(x) -> Prompt(x))\nforall x (Corrupt(x) -> Sharing(x))\nforall x (Balconied(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Downstairs(x) and Prompt(x) -> Paroicous(x))\nforall x (Corrupt(x) -> Downstairs(x))\n\nParoicous(baily)\n\nforall x (Balconied(x) -> Paroicous(x)) <- forall x (Uncapped(x) -> Balconied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Thorndike is insulting. Thorndike is nazarene. Gill is ultrasonic. Gill is insidious. Burt is relevant. Burt is not nazarene. Burt is insidious. If Thorndike is ultrasonic and Thorndike is insulting then Thorndike is outsize. If something is relevant and insulting then it is not fibreoptic. All nazarene things are fibreoptic. If something is insidious and not nazarene then it is outsize. All ultrasonic things are relevant. Kind things are insulting. All insidious, outsize things are insulting. All ultrasonic things are insidious. Gill is not outsize.", "logic": "\nInsulting(thorndike)\nNazarene(thorndike)\nUltrasonic(gill)\nInsidious(gill)\nRelevant(burt)\nnot Nazarene(burt)\nInsidious(burt)\nUltrasonic(thorndike) and Insulting(thorndike) -> Outsize(thorndike)\nforall x (Relevant(x) and Insulting(x) -> not Fibreoptic(x))\nforall x (Nazarene(x) -> Fibreoptic(x))\nforall x (Insidious(x) and not Nazarene(x) -> Outsize(x))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) -> Relevant(x))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> Insulting(x))\nforall x (Insidious(x) and Outsize(x) -> Insulting(x))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) -> Insidious(x))\n\nnot Outsize(gill)\n\nforall x (Insidious(x) and not Nazarene(x) -> Outsize(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Carine is divalent. Carine is approving. Gordan is tenor. Gordan is cultivated. Farrah is resentful. Farrah is not approving. Farrah is cultivated. If Carine is tenor and Carine is divalent then Carine is steely. If something is resentful and divalent then it is not romani. All approving things are romani. If something is cultivated and not approving then it is steely. All tenor things are resentful. Kind things are divalent. All cultivated, steely things are divalent. All tenor things are cultivated. Carine is steely.", "logic": "\nDivalent(carine)\nApproving(carine)\nTenor(gordan)\nCultivated(gordan)\nResentful(farrah)\nnot Approving(farrah)\nCultivated(farrah)\nTenor(carine) and Divalent(carine) -> Steely(carine)\nforall x (Resentful(x) and Divalent(x) -> not Romani(x))\nforall x (Approving(x) -> Romani(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and not Approving(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Tenor(x) -> Resentful(x))\nforall x (Romani(x) -> Divalent(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and Steely(x) -> Divalent(x))\nforall x (Tenor(x) -> Cultivated(x))\n\nSteely(carine)\n\nTenor(carine) and Divalent(carine) -> Steely(carine) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Sven is botryoidal. Sven is beggarly. Sonya is mandean. Sonya is friable. Kelsy is spurious. Kelsy is not beggarly. Kelsy is friable. If Sven is mandean and Sven is botryoidal then Sven is vaccinated. If something is spurious and botryoidal then it is not unbarreled. All beggarly things are unbarreled. If something is friable and not beggarly then it is vaccinated. All mandean things are spurious. Kind things are botryoidal. All friable, vaccinated things are botryoidal. All mandean things are friable. Sonya is not beggarly.", "logic": "\nBotryoidal(sven)\nBeggarly(sven)\nMandean(sonya)\nFriable(sonya)\nSpurious(kelsy)\nnot Beggarly(kelsy)\nFriable(kelsy)\nMandean(sven) and Botryoidal(sven) -> Vaccinated(sven)\nforall x (Spurious(x) and Botryoidal(x) -> not Unbarreled(x))\nforall x (Beggarly(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\nforall x (Friable(x) and not Beggarly(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Mandean(x) -> Spurious(x))\nforall x (Unbarreled(x) -> Botryoidal(x))\nforall x (Friable(x) and Vaccinated(x) -> Botryoidal(x))\nforall x (Mandean(x) -> Friable(x))\n\nnot Beggarly(sonya)\n\nnot Beggarly(sonya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "Mindy is lxiii. Mindy is unabashed. Pia is unsinkable. Pia is nephritic. Yehudit is isotonic. Yehudit is not unabashed. Yehudit is nephritic. If Mindy is unsinkable and Mindy is lxiii then Mindy is husky. If something is isotonic and lxiii then it is not appraising. All unabashed things are appraising. If something is nephritic and not unabashed then it is husky. All unsinkable things are isotonic. Kind things are lxiii. All nephritic, husky things are lxiii. All unsinkable things are nephritic. Yehudit is unsinkable.", "logic": "\nLxiii(mindy)\nUnabashed(mindy)\nUnsinkable(pia)\nNephritic(pia)\nIsotonic(yehudit)\nnot Unabashed(yehudit)\nNephritic(yehudit)\nUnsinkable(mindy) and Lxiii(mindy) -> Husky(mindy)\nforall x (Isotonic(x) and Lxiii(x) -> not Appraising(x))\nforall x (Unabashed(x) -> Appraising(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) and not Unabashed(x) -> Husky(x))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Isotonic(x))\nforall x (Appraising(x) -> Lxiii(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) and Husky(x) -> Lxiii(x))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Nephritic(x))\n\nUnsinkable(yehudit)\n\nUnsinkable(yehudit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1472"} {"premises": "The peggi doodle the noah. The peggi disqualify the rosalie. The peggi disqualify the noah. The peggi divaricate the rosalie. The peggi divaricate the noah. The rosalie is acicular. The rosalie is vapourific. The rosalie doodle the peggi. The rosalie doodle the noah. The rosalie disqualify the noah. The rosalie does not visit the noah. The noah divaricate the rosalie. If something disqualify the noah then it is proto. If something is vapourific then it does not visit the noah. If something disqualify the rosalie and the rosalie does not need the noah then the rosalie is acicular. If something is proto then it divaricate the rosalie. If something divaricate the rosalie then it is not puritanic. If the peggi is vapourific then the peggi disqualify the noah. The peggi doodle the noah.", "logic": "\nDoodle(peggi, noah)\nDisqualify(peggi, rosalie)\nDisqualify(peggi, noah)\nDivaricate(peggi, rosalie)\nDivaricate(peggi, noah)\nAcicular(rosalie)\nVapourific(rosalie)\nDoodle(rosalie, peggi)\nDoodle(rosalie, noah)\nDisqualify(rosalie, noah)\nnot Divaricate(rosalie, noah)\nDivaricate(noah, rosalie)\nforall x (Disqualify(x, noah) -> Proto(x))\nforall x (Vapourific(x) -> not Divaricate(x, noah))\nforall x (Disqualify(x, rosalie) and not Disqualify(rosalie, noah) -> Acicular(rosalie))\nforall x (Proto(x) -> Divaricate(x, rosalie))\nforall x (Divaricate(x, rosalie) -> not Puritanic(x))\nVapourific(peggi) -> Disqualify(peggi, noah)\n\nDoodle(peggi, noah)\n\ntherefore Doodle(peggi, noah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The ailey cipher the magdalen. The ailey exhibit the lesley. The ailey exhibit the magdalen. The ailey swank the lesley. The ailey swank the magdalen. The lesley is preferent. The lesley is aciduric. The lesley cipher the ailey. The lesley cipher the magdalen. The lesley exhibit the magdalen. The lesley does not visit the magdalen. The magdalen swank the lesley. If something exhibit the magdalen then it is unscalable. If something is aciduric then it does not visit the magdalen. If something exhibit the lesley and the lesley does not need the magdalen then the lesley is preferent. If something is unscalable then it swank the lesley. If something swank the lesley then it is not bipinnate. If the ailey is aciduric then the ailey exhibit the magdalen. The lesley does not like the magdalen.", "logic": "\nCipher(ailey, magdalen)\nExhibit(ailey, lesley)\nExhibit(ailey, magdalen)\nSwank(ailey, lesley)\nSwank(ailey, magdalen)\nPreferent(lesley)\nAciduric(lesley)\nCipher(lesley, ailey)\nCipher(lesley, magdalen)\nExhibit(lesley, magdalen)\nnot Swank(lesley, magdalen)\nSwank(magdalen, lesley)\nforall x (Exhibit(x, magdalen) -> Unscalable(x))\nforall x (Aciduric(x) -> not Swank(x, magdalen))\nforall x (Exhibit(x, lesley) and not Exhibit(lesley, magdalen) -> Preferent(lesley))\nforall x (Unscalable(x) -> Swank(x, lesley))\nforall x (Swank(x, lesley) -> not Bipinnate(x))\nAciduric(ailey) -> Exhibit(ailey, magdalen)\n\nnot Cipher(lesley, magdalen)\n\ntherefore Cipher(lesley, magdalen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The maryellen drowse the eleni. The maryellen hurl the sven. The maryellen hurl the eleni. The maryellen hiss the sven. The maryellen hiss the eleni. The sven is zaftig. The sven is imaginable. The sven drowse the maryellen. The sven drowse the eleni. The sven hurl the eleni. The sven does not visit the eleni. The eleni hiss the sven. If something hurl the eleni then it is syncretic. If something is imaginable then it does not visit the eleni. If something hurl the sven and the sven does not need the eleni then the sven is zaftig. If something is syncretic then it hiss the sven. If something hiss the sven then it is not attained. If the maryellen is imaginable then the maryellen hurl the eleni. The maryellen is not attained.", "logic": "\nDrowse(maryellen, eleni)\nHurl(maryellen, sven)\nHurl(maryellen, eleni)\nHiss(maryellen, sven)\nHiss(maryellen, eleni)\nZaftig(sven)\nImaginable(sven)\nDrowse(sven, maryellen)\nDrowse(sven, eleni)\nHurl(sven, eleni)\nnot Hiss(sven, eleni)\nHiss(eleni, sven)\nforall x (Hurl(x, eleni) -> Syncretic(x))\nforall x (Imaginable(x) -> not Hiss(x, eleni))\nforall x (Hurl(x, sven) and not Hurl(sven, eleni) -> Zaftig(sven))\nforall x (Syncretic(x) -> Hiss(x, sven))\nforall x (Hiss(x, sven) -> not Attained(x))\nImaginable(maryellen) -> Hurl(maryellen, eleni)\n\nnot Attained(maryellen)\n\nHiss(maryellen, sven) and forall x (Hiss(x, sven) -> not Attained(x)) -> therefore not Attained(maryellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The calida execrate the filbert. The calida armor the terrianne. The calida armor the filbert. The calida pack the terrianne. The calida pack the filbert. The terrianne is senior. The terrianne is saxicoline. The terrianne execrate the calida. The terrianne execrate the filbert. The terrianne armor the filbert. The terrianne does not visit the filbert. The filbert pack the terrianne. If something armor the filbert then it is knobbly. If something is saxicoline then it does not visit the filbert. If something armor the terrianne and the terrianne does not need the filbert then the terrianne is senior. If something is knobbly then it pack the terrianne. If something pack the terrianne then it is not observable. If the calida is saxicoline then the calida armor the filbert. The terrianne is not knobbly.", "logic": "\nExecrate(calida, filbert)\nArmor(calida, terrianne)\nArmor(calida, filbert)\nPack(calida, terrianne)\nPack(calida, filbert)\nSenior(terrianne)\nSaxicoline(terrianne)\nExecrate(terrianne, calida)\nExecrate(terrianne, filbert)\nArmor(terrianne, filbert)\nnot Pack(terrianne, filbert)\nPack(filbert, terrianne)\nforall x (Armor(x, filbert) -> Knobbly(x))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> not Pack(x, filbert))\nforall x (Armor(x, terrianne) and not Armor(terrianne, filbert) -> Senior(terrianne))\nforall x (Knobbly(x) -> Pack(x, terrianne))\nforall x (Pack(x, terrianne) -> not Observable(x))\nSaxicoline(calida) -> Armor(calida, filbert)\n\nnot Knobbly(terrianne)\n\nArmor(terrianne, filbert) and forall x (Armor(x, filbert) -> Knobbly(x)) -> therefore Knobbly(terrianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The kirsteni downgrade the clyde. The kirsteni calve the germana. The kirsteni calve the clyde. The kirsteni cure the germana. The kirsteni cure the clyde. The germana is heralded. The germana is bantoid. The germana downgrade the kirsteni. The germana downgrade the clyde. The germana calve the clyde. The germana does not visit the clyde. The clyde cure the germana. If something calve the clyde then it is wily. If something is bantoid then it does not visit the clyde. If something calve the germana and the germana does not need the clyde then the germana is heralded. If something is wily then it cure the germana. If something cure the germana then it is not neoclassic. If the kirsteni is bantoid then the kirsteni calve the clyde. The germana cure the germana.", "logic": "\nDowngrade(kirsteni, clyde)\nCalve(kirsteni, germana)\nCalve(kirsteni, clyde)\nCure(kirsteni, germana)\nCure(kirsteni, clyde)\nHeralded(germana)\nBantoid(germana)\nDowngrade(germana, kirsteni)\nDowngrade(germana, clyde)\nCalve(germana, clyde)\nnot Cure(germana, clyde)\nCure(clyde, germana)\nforall x (Calve(x, clyde) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Bantoid(x) -> not Cure(x, clyde))\nforall x (Calve(x, germana) and not Calve(germana, clyde) -> Heralded(germana))\nforall x (Wily(x) -> Cure(x, germana))\nforall x (Cure(x, germana) -> not Neoclassic(x))\nBantoid(kirsteni) -> Calve(kirsteni, clyde)\n\nCure(germana, germana)\n\nCalve(germana, clyde) and forall x (Calve(x, clyde) -> Wily(x)) -> therefore Wily(germana) Wily(germana) and forall x (Wily(x) -> Cure(x, germana)) -> therefore Cure(germana, germana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The sigfrid plunder the dayle. The sigfrid liven the brigitte. The sigfrid liven the dayle. The sigfrid deoxidise the brigitte. The sigfrid deoxidise the dayle. The brigitte is allergic. The brigitte is plucked. The brigitte plunder the sigfrid. The brigitte plunder the dayle. The brigitte liven the dayle. The brigitte does not visit the dayle. The dayle deoxidise the brigitte. If something liven the dayle then it is oscitant. If something is plucked then it does not visit the dayle. If something liven the brigitte and the brigitte does not need the dayle then the brigitte is allergic. If something is oscitant then it deoxidise the brigitte. If something deoxidise the brigitte then it is not detected. If the sigfrid is plucked then the sigfrid liven the dayle. The brigitte does not visit the brigitte.", "logic": "\nPlunder(sigfrid, dayle)\nLiven(sigfrid, brigitte)\nLiven(sigfrid, dayle)\nDeoxidise(sigfrid, brigitte)\nDeoxidise(sigfrid, dayle)\nAllergic(brigitte)\nPlucked(brigitte)\nPlunder(brigitte, sigfrid)\nPlunder(brigitte, dayle)\nLiven(brigitte, dayle)\nnot Deoxidise(brigitte, dayle)\nDeoxidise(dayle, brigitte)\nforall x (Liven(x, dayle) -> Oscitant(x))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> not Deoxidise(x, dayle))\nforall x (Liven(x, brigitte) and not Liven(brigitte, dayle) -> Allergic(brigitte))\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Deoxidise(x, brigitte))\nforall x (Deoxidise(x, brigitte) -> not Detected(x))\nPlucked(sigfrid) -> Liven(sigfrid, dayle)\n\nnot Deoxidise(brigitte, brigitte)\n\nLiven(brigitte, dayle) and forall x (Liven(x, dayle) -> Oscitant(x)) -> therefore Oscitant(brigitte) Oscitant(brigitte) and forall x (Oscitant(x) -> Deoxidise(x, brigitte)) -> therefore Deoxidise(brigitte, brigitte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The lem beseech the letty. The lem furlough the agretha. The lem furlough the letty. The lem revel the agretha. The lem revel the letty. The agretha is egyptian. The agretha is mesial. The agretha beseech the lem. The agretha beseech the letty. The agretha furlough the letty. The agretha does not visit the letty. The letty revel the agretha. If something furlough the letty then it is bashful. If something is mesial then it does not visit the letty. If something furlough the agretha and the agretha does not need the letty then the agretha is egyptian. If something is bashful then it revel the agretha. If something revel the agretha then it is not anuric. If the lem is mesial then the lem furlough the letty. The agretha is not anuric.", "logic": "\nBeseech(lem, letty)\nFurlough(lem, agretha)\nFurlough(lem, letty)\nRevel(lem, agretha)\nRevel(lem, letty)\nEgyptian(agretha)\nMesial(agretha)\nBeseech(agretha, lem)\nBeseech(agretha, letty)\nFurlough(agretha, letty)\nnot Revel(agretha, letty)\nRevel(letty, agretha)\nforall x (Furlough(x, letty) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> not Revel(x, letty))\nforall x (Furlough(x, agretha) and not Furlough(agretha, letty) -> Egyptian(agretha))\nforall x (Bashful(x) -> Revel(x, agretha))\nforall x (Revel(x, agretha) -> not Anuric(x))\nMesial(lem) -> Furlough(lem, letty)\n\nnot Anuric(agretha)\n\nFurlough(agretha, letty) and forall x (Furlough(x, letty) -> Bashful(x)) -> therefore Bashful(agretha) Bashful(agretha) and forall x (Bashful(x) -> Revel(x, agretha)) -> therefore Revel(agretha, agretha) Revel(agretha, agretha) and forall x (Revel(x, agretha) -> not Anuric(x)) -> therefore not Anuric(agretha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The trey stockpile the caresse. The trey pollard the sherye. The trey pollard the caresse. The trey souse the sherye. The trey souse the caresse. The sherye is unerring. The sherye is desirable. The sherye stockpile the trey. The sherye stockpile the caresse. The sherye pollard the caresse. The sherye does not visit the caresse. The caresse souse the sherye. If something pollard the caresse then it is articulate. If something is desirable then it does not visit the caresse. If something pollard the sherye and the sherye does not need the caresse then the sherye is unerring. If something is articulate then it souse the sherye. If something souse the sherye then it is not breeding. If the trey is desirable then the trey pollard the caresse. The sherye is breeding.", "logic": "\nStockpile(trey, caresse)\nPollard(trey, sherye)\nPollard(trey, caresse)\nSouse(trey, sherye)\nSouse(trey, caresse)\nUnerring(sherye)\nDesirable(sherye)\nStockpile(sherye, trey)\nStockpile(sherye, caresse)\nPollard(sherye, caresse)\nnot Souse(sherye, caresse)\nSouse(caresse, sherye)\nforall x (Pollard(x, caresse) -> Articulate(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) -> not Souse(x, caresse))\nforall x (Pollard(x, sherye) and not Pollard(sherye, caresse) -> Unerring(sherye))\nforall x (Articulate(x) -> Souse(x, sherye))\nforall x (Souse(x, sherye) -> not Breeding(x))\nDesirable(trey) -> Pollard(trey, caresse)\n\nBreeding(sherye)\n\nPollard(sherye, caresse) and forall x (Pollard(x, caresse) -> Articulate(x)) -> therefore Articulate(sherye) Articulate(sherye) and forall x (Articulate(x) -> Souse(x, sherye)) -> therefore Souse(sherye, sherye) Souse(sherye, sherye) and forall x (Souse(x, sherye) -> not Breeding(x)) -> therefore not Breeding(sherye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The susann garble the alberta. The susann exit the willey. The susann exit the alberta. The susann retrofit the willey. The susann retrofit the alberta. The willey is paroxysmal. The willey is unfledged. The willey garble the susann. The willey garble the alberta. The willey exit the alberta. The willey does not visit the alberta. The alberta retrofit the willey. If something exit the alberta then it is boastful. If something is unfledged then it does not visit the alberta. If something exit the willey and the willey does not need the alberta then the willey is paroxysmal. If something is boastful then it retrofit the willey. If something retrofit the willey then it is not expandable. If the susann is unfledged then the susann exit the alberta. The alberta is not boastful.", "logic": "\nGarble(susann, alberta)\nExit(susann, willey)\nExit(susann, alberta)\nRetrofit(susann, willey)\nRetrofit(susann, alberta)\nParoxysmal(willey)\nUnfledged(willey)\nGarble(willey, susann)\nGarble(willey, alberta)\nExit(willey, alberta)\nnot Retrofit(willey, alberta)\nRetrofit(alberta, willey)\nforall x (Exit(x, alberta) -> Boastful(x))\nforall x (Unfledged(x) -> not Retrofit(x, alberta))\nforall x (Exit(x, willey) and not Exit(willey, alberta) -> Paroxysmal(willey))\nforall x (Boastful(x) -> Retrofit(x, willey))\nforall x (Retrofit(x, willey) -> not Expandable(x))\nUnfledged(susann) -> Exit(susann, alberta)\n\nnot Boastful(alberta)\n\nforall x (Exit(x, alberta) -> Boastful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The eula beam the gratiana. The eula recast the celinda. The eula recast the gratiana. The eula incandesce the celinda. The eula incandesce the gratiana. The celinda is miserly. The celinda is unaffixed. The celinda beam the eula. The celinda beam the gratiana. The celinda recast the gratiana. The celinda does not visit the gratiana. The gratiana incandesce the celinda. If something recast the gratiana then it is slovenian. If something is unaffixed then it does not visit the gratiana. If something recast the celinda and the celinda does not need the gratiana then the celinda is miserly. If something is slovenian then it incandesce the celinda. If something incandesce the celinda then it is not exergonic. If the eula is unaffixed then the eula recast the gratiana. The gratiana recast the eula.", "logic": "\nBeam(eula, gratiana)\nRecast(eula, celinda)\nRecast(eula, gratiana)\nIncandesce(eula, celinda)\nIncandesce(eula, gratiana)\nMiserly(celinda)\nUnaffixed(celinda)\nBeam(celinda, eula)\nBeam(celinda, gratiana)\nRecast(celinda, gratiana)\nnot Incandesce(celinda, gratiana)\nIncandesce(gratiana, celinda)\nforall x (Recast(x, gratiana) -> Slovenian(x))\nforall x (Unaffixed(x) -> not Incandesce(x, gratiana))\nforall x (Recast(x, celinda) and not Recast(celinda, gratiana) -> Miserly(celinda))\nforall x (Slovenian(x) -> Incandesce(x, celinda))\nforall x (Incandesce(x, celinda) -> not Exergonic(x))\nUnaffixed(eula) -> Recast(eula, gratiana)\n\nRecast(gratiana, eula)\n\nRecast(gratiana, eula) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The trisha harken the layne. The trisha split the maudie. The trisha split the layne. The trisha unsettle the maudie. The trisha unsettle the layne. The maudie is inexpert. The maudie is ninetieth. The maudie harken the trisha. The maudie harken the layne. The maudie split the layne. The maudie does not visit the layne. The layne unsettle the maudie. If something split the layne then it is other. If something is ninetieth then it does not visit the layne. If something split the maudie and the maudie does not need the layne then the maudie is inexpert. If something is other then it unsettle the maudie. If something unsettle the maudie then it is not epicyclic. If the trisha is ninetieth then the trisha split the layne. The trisha is not inexpert.", "logic": "\nHarken(trisha, layne)\nSplit(trisha, maudie)\nSplit(trisha, layne)\nUnsettle(trisha, maudie)\nUnsettle(trisha, layne)\nInexpert(maudie)\nNinetieth(maudie)\nHarken(maudie, trisha)\nHarken(maudie, layne)\nSplit(maudie, layne)\nnot Unsettle(maudie, layne)\nUnsettle(layne, maudie)\nforall x (Split(x, layne) -> Other(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) -> not Unsettle(x, layne))\nforall x (Split(x, maudie) and not Split(maudie, layne) -> Inexpert(maudie))\nforall x (Other(x) -> Unsettle(x, maudie))\nforall x (Unsettle(x, maudie) -> not Epicyclic(x))\nNinetieth(trisha) -> Split(trisha, layne)\n\nnot Inexpert(trisha)\n\nnot Inexpert(trisha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The sharleen whimper the reeva. The sharleen solace the loria. The sharleen solace the reeva. The sharleen surpass the loria. The sharleen surpass the reeva. The loria is ambulacral. The loria is found. The loria whimper the sharleen. The loria whimper the reeva. The loria solace the reeva. The loria does not visit the reeva. The reeva surpass the loria. If something solace the reeva then it is alar. If something is found then it does not visit the reeva. If something solace the loria and the loria does not need the reeva then the loria is ambulacral. If something is alar then it surpass the loria. If something surpass the loria then it is not semestral. If the sharleen is found then the sharleen solace the reeva. The sharleen surpass the sharleen.", "logic": "\nWhimper(sharleen, reeva)\nSolace(sharleen, loria)\nSolace(sharleen, reeva)\nSurpass(sharleen, loria)\nSurpass(sharleen, reeva)\nAmbulacral(loria)\nFound(loria)\nWhimper(loria, sharleen)\nWhimper(loria, reeva)\nSolace(loria, reeva)\nnot Surpass(loria, reeva)\nSurpass(reeva, loria)\nforall x (Solace(x, reeva) -> Alar(x))\nforall x (Found(x) -> not Surpass(x, reeva))\nforall x (Solace(x, loria) and not Solace(loria, reeva) -> Ambulacral(loria))\nforall x (Alar(x) -> Surpass(x, loria))\nforall x (Surpass(x, loria) -> not Semestral(x))\nFound(sharleen) -> Solace(sharleen, reeva)\n\nSurpass(sharleen, sharleen)\n\nSurpass(sharleen, sharleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The magda cable the leola. The magda lobby the lynett. The magda lobby the leola. The magda retaliate the lynett. The magda retaliate the leola. The lynett is inured. The lynett is cinnabar. The lynett cable the magda. The lynett cable the leola. The lynett lobby the leola. The lynett does not visit the leola. The leola retaliate the lynett. If something lobby the leola then it is antigenic. If something is cinnabar then it does not visit the leola. If something lobby the lynett and the lynett does not need the leola then the lynett is inured. If something is antigenic then it retaliate the lynett. If something retaliate the lynett then it is not clear. If the magda is cinnabar then the magda lobby the leola. The magda is not cinnabar.", "logic": "\nCable(magda, leola)\nLobby(magda, lynett)\nLobby(magda, leola)\nRetaliate(magda, lynett)\nRetaliate(magda, leola)\nInured(lynett)\nCinnabar(lynett)\nCable(lynett, magda)\nCable(lynett, leola)\nLobby(lynett, leola)\nnot Retaliate(lynett, leola)\nRetaliate(leola, lynett)\nforall x (Lobby(x, leola) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Cinnabar(x) -> not Retaliate(x, leola))\nforall x (Lobby(x, lynett) and not Lobby(lynett, leola) -> Inured(lynett))\nforall x (Antigenic(x) -> Retaliate(x, lynett))\nforall x (Retaliate(x, lynett) -> not Clear(x))\nCinnabar(magda) -> Lobby(magda, leola)\n\nnot Cinnabar(magda)\n\nnot Cinnabar(magda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The yolande trifle the tasha. The yolande apparel the magdalena. The yolande apparel the tasha. The yolande anatomize the magdalena. The yolande anatomize the tasha. The magdalena is offside. The magdalena is microbic. The magdalena trifle the yolande. The magdalena trifle the tasha. The magdalena apparel the tasha. The magdalena does not visit the tasha. The tasha anatomize the magdalena. If something apparel the tasha then it is painterly. If something is microbic then it does not visit the tasha. If something apparel the magdalena and the magdalena does not need the tasha then the magdalena is offside. If something is painterly then it anatomize the magdalena. If something anatomize the magdalena then it is not furrowed. If the yolande is microbic then the yolande apparel the tasha. The magdalena trifle the magdalena.", "logic": "\nTrifle(yolande, tasha)\nApparel(yolande, magdalena)\nApparel(yolande, tasha)\nAnatomize(yolande, magdalena)\nAnatomize(yolande, tasha)\nOffside(magdalena)\nMicrobic(magdalena)\nTrifle(magdalena, yolande)\nTrifle(magdalena, tasha)\nApparel(magdalena, tasha)\nnot Anatomize(magdalena, tasha)\nAnatomize(tasha, magdalena)\nforall x (Apparel(x, tasha) -> Painterly(x))\nforall x (Microbic(x) -> not Anatomize(x, tasha))\nforall x (Apparel(x, magdalena) and not Apparel(magdalena, tasha) -> Offside(magdalena))\nforall x (Painterly(x) -> Anatomize(x, magdalena))\nforall x (Anatomize(x, magdalena) -> not Furrowed(x))\nMicrobic(yolande) -> Apparel(yolande, tasha)\n\nTrifle(magdalena, magdalena)\n\nTrifle(magdalena, magdalena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The viviana subvent the melisa. The viviana whap the alica. The viviana whap the melisa. The viviana ideate the alica. The viviana ideate the melisa. The alica is molded. The alica is sewn. The alica subvent the viviana. The alica subvent the melisa. The alica whap the melisa. The alica does not visit the melisa. The melisa ideate the alica. If something whap the melisa then it is hurrying. If something is sewn then it does not visit the melisa. If something whap the alica and the alica does not need the melisa then the alica is molded. If something is hurrying then it ideate the alica. If something ideate the alica then it is not organismal. If the viviana is sewn then the viviana whap the melisa. The alica does not need the viviana.", "logic": "\nSubvent(viviana, melisa)\nWhap(viviana, alica)\nWhap(viviana, melisa)\nIdeate(viviana, alica)\nIdeate(viviana, melisa)\nMolded(alica)\nSewn(alica)\nSubvent(alica, viviana)\nSubvent(alica, melisa)\nWhap(alica, melisa)\nnot Ideate(alica, melisa)\nIdeate(melisa, alica)\nforall x (Whap(x, melisa) -> Hurrying(x))\nforall x (Sewn(x) -> not Ideate(x, melisa))\nforall x (Whap(x, alica) and not Whap(alica, melisa) -> Molded(alica))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) -> Ideate(x, alica))\nforall x (Ideate(x, alica) -> not Organismal(x))\nSewn(viviana) -> Whap(viviana, melisa)\n\nnot Whap(alica, viviana)\n\nnot Whap(alica, viviana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "The allegra serenade the karalynn. The allegra croak the fabian. The allegra croak the karalynn. The allegra binge the fabian. The allegra binge the karalynn. The fabian is biform. The fabian is uppity. The fabian serenade the allegra. The fabian serenade the karalynn. The fabian croak the karalynn. The fabian does not visit the karalynn. The karalynn binge the fabian. If something croak the karalynn then it is torturous. If something is uppity then it does not visit the karalynn. If something croak the fabian and the fabian does not need the karalynn then the fabian is biform. If something is torturous then it binge the fabian. If something binge the fabian then it is not molar. If the allegra is uppity then the allegra croak the karalynn. The allegra serenade the fabian.", "logic": "\nSerenade(allegra, karalynn)\nCroak(allegra, fabian)\nCroak(allegra, karalynn)\nBinge(allegra, fabian)\nBinge(allegra, karalynn)\nBiform(fabian)\nUppity(fabian)\nSerenade(fabian, allegra)\nSerenade(fabian, karalynn)\nCroak(fabian, karalynn)\nnot Binge(fabian, karalynn)\nBinge(karalynn, fabian)\nforall x (Croak(x, karalynn) -> Torturous(x))\nforall x (Uppity(x) -> not Binge(x, karalynn))\nforall x (Croak(x, fabian) and not Croak(fabian, karalynn) -> Biform(fabian))\nforall x (Torturous(x) -> Binge(x, fabian))\nforall x (Binge(x, fabian) -> not Molar(x))\nUppity(allegra) -> Croak(allegra, karalynn)\n\nSerenade(allegra, fabian)\n\nSerenade(allegra, fabian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1081"} {"premises": "Virgilio is inverted. Virgilio is petulant. Virgilio is agog. Virgilio is important. Virgilio is bare. Virgilio is provencal. Virgilio is androgenic. If Virgilio is inverted then Virgilio is bare. Furry people are androgenic. If Virgilio is provencal then Virgilio is androgenic. If Virgilio is inverted then Virgilio is petulant. All agog, petulant people are androgenic. If Virgilio is petulant and Virgilio is inverted then Virgilio is provencal. Virgilio is important.", "logic": "\nInverted(virgilio)\nPetulant(virgilio)\nAgog(virgilio)\nImportant(virgilio)\nBare(virgilio)\nProvencal(virgilio)\nAndrogenic(virgilio)\nInverted(virgilio) -> Bare(virgilio)\nforall x (Inverted(x) -> Androgenic(x))\nProvencal(virgilio) -> Androgenic(virgilio)\nInverted(virgilio) -> Petulant(virgilio)\nforall x (Agog(x) and Petulant(x) -> Androgenic(x))\nPetulant(virgilio) and Inverted(virgilio) -> Provencal(virgilio)\n\nImportant(virgilio)\n\ntherefore Important(virgilio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2262"} {"premises": "Minna is accusing. Minna is unworried. Minna is tailless. Minna is precatory. Minna is crenulated. Minna is cambrian. Minna is reputable. If Minna is accusing then Minna is crenulated. Furry people are reputable. If Minna is cambrian then Minna is reputable. If Minna is accusing then Minna is unworried. All tailless, unworried people are reputable. If Minna is unworried and Minna is accusing then Minna is cambrian. Minna is not reputable.", "logic": "\nAccusing(minna)\nUnworried(minna)\nTailless(minna)\nPrecatory(minna)\nCrenulated(minna)\nCambrian(minna)\nReputable(minna)\nAccusing(minna) -> Crenulated(minna)\nforall x (Accusing(x) -> Reputable(x))\nCambrian(minna) -> Reputable(minna)\nAccusing(minna) -> Unworried(minna)\nforall x (Tailless(x) and Unworried(x) -> Reputable(x))\nUnworried(minna) and Accusing(minna) -> Cambrian(minna)\n\nnot Reputable(minna)\n\ntherefore Reputable(minna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2262"} {"premises": "Richie is not pulverized. Richie is redux. Richie is not jesuitical. Richie is araceous. Puff is not pulverized. Puff is jesuitical. Puff is veracious. Puff is pigheaded. Puff is araceous. Puff is bouldered. If Puff is bouldered then Puff is veracious. Rough, pulverized things are redux. If Puff is not bouldered then Puff is araceous. All bouldered, veracious things are pigheaded. Smart things are veracious. If something is araceous then it is veracious. Puff is bouldered.", "logic": "\nnot Pulverized(richie)\nRedux(richie)\nnot Jesuitical(richie)\nAraceous(richie)\nnot Pulverized(puff)\nJesuitical(puff)\nVeracious(puff)\nPigheaded(puff)\nAraceous(puff)\nBouldered(puff)\nBouldered(puff) -> Veracious(puff)\nforall x (Veracious(x) and Pulverized(x) -> Redux(x))\nnot Bouldered(puff) -> Araceous(puff)\nforall x (Bouldered(x) and Veracious(x) -> Pigheaded(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> Veracious(x))\nforall x (Araceous(x) -> Veracious(x))\n\nBouldered(puff)\n\ntherefore Bouldered(puff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2154"} {"premises": "Warden is not frore. Warden is umbilicate. Warden is not undying. Warden is anicteric. Florinda is not frore. Florinda is undying. Florinda is analgetic. Florinda is granulated. Florinda is anicteric. Florinda is hemostatic. If Florinda is hemostatic then Florinda is analgetic. Rough, frore things are umbilicate. If Florinda is not hemostatic then Florinda is anicteric. All hemostatic, analgetic things are granulated. Smart things are analgetic. If something is anicteric then it is analgetic. Florinda is frore.", "logic": "\nnot Frore(warden)\nUmbilicate(warden)\nnot Undying(warden)\nAnicteric(warden)\nnot Frore(florinda)\nUndying(florinda)\nAnalgetic(florinda)\nGranulated(florinda)\nAnicteric(florinda)\nHemostatic(florinda)\nHemostatic(florinda) -> Analgetic(florinda)\nforall x (Analgetic(x) and Frore(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\nnot Hemostatic(florinda) -> Anicteric(florinda)\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) and Analgetic(x) -> Granulated(x))\nforall x (Anicteric(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Anicteric(x) -> Analgetic(x))\n\nFrore(florinda)\n\ntherefore not Frore(florinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2154"} {"premises": "Elli is not hilly. Elli is lustful. Elli is not dogging. Elli is peanut. Nikoletta is not hilly. Nikoletta is dogging. Nikoletta is unsaid. Nikoletta is abreast. Nikoletta is peanut. Nikoletta is stupefied. If Nikoletta is stupefied then Nikoletta is unsaid. Rough, hilly things are lustful. If Nikoletta is not stupefied then Nikoletta is peanut. All stupefied, unsaid things are abreast. Smart things are unsaid. If something is peanut then it is unsaid. Elli is unsaid.", "logic": "\nnot Hilly(elli)\nLustful(elli)\nnot Dogging(elli)\nPeanut(elli)\nnot Hilly(nikoletta)\nDogging(nikoletta)\nUnsaid(nikoletta)\nAbreast(nikoletta)\nPeanut(nikoletta)\nStupefied(nikoletta)\nStupefied(nikoletta) -> Unsaid(nikoletta)\nforall x (Unsaid(x) and Hilly(x) -> Lustful(x))\nnot Stupefied(nikoletta) -> Peanut(nikoletta)\nforall x (Stupefied(x) and Unsaid(x) -> Abreast(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Unsaid(x))\nforall x (Peanut(x) -> Unsaid(x))\n\nUnsaid(elli)\n\nPeanut(elli) and forall x (Peanut(x) -> Unsaid(x)) -> therefore Unsaid(elli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2154"} {"premises": "Carmon is not exposed. Carmon is filmed. Carmon is not beholden. Carmon is purging. Stanly is not exposed. Stanly is beholden. Stanly is thermal. Stanly is side. Stanly is purging. Stanly is ascetical. If Stanly is ascetical then Stanly is thermal. Rough, exposed things are filmed. If Stanly is not ascetical then Stanly is purging. All ascetical, thermal things are side. Smart things are thermal. If something is purging then it is thermal. Carmon is not thermal.", "logic": "\nnot Exposed(carmon)\nFilmed(carmon)\nnot Beholden(carmon)\nPurging(carmon)\nnot Exposed(stanly)\nBeholden(stanly)\nThermal(stanly)\nSide(stanly)\nPurging(stanly)\nAscetical(stanly)\nAscetical(stanly) -> Thermal(stanly)\nforall x (Thermal(x) and Exposed(x) -> Filmed(x))\nnot Ascetical(stanly) -> Purging(stanly)\nforall x (Ascetical(x) and Thermal(x) -> Side(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Thermal(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Thermal(x))\n\nnot Thermal(carmon)\n\nPurging(carmon) and forall x (Purging(x) -> Thermal(x)) -> therefore Thermal(carmon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2154"} {"premises": "Tammy is not unwarmed. Tammy is cruddy. Tammy is not blowy. Tammy is parabolic. Duffy is not unwarmed. Duffy is blowy. Duffy is prepupal. Duffy is arrayed. Duffy is parabolic. Duffy is celluloid. If Duffy is celluloid then Duffy is prepupal. Rough, unwarmed things are cruddy. If Duffy is not celluloid then Duffy is parabolic. All celluloid, prepupal things are arrayed. Smart things are prepupal. If something is parabolic then it is prepupal. Duffy is not cruddy.", "logic": "\nnot Unwarmed(tammy)\nCruddy(tammy)\nnot Blowy(tammy)\nParabolic(tammy)\nnot Unwarmed(duffy)\nBlowy(duffy)\nPrepupal(duffy)\nArrayed(duffy)\nParabolic(duffy)\nCelluloid(duffy)\nCelluloid(duffy) -> Prepupal(duffy)\nforall x (Prepupal(x) and Unwarmed(x) -> Cruddy(x))\nnot Celluloid(duffy) -> Parabolic(duffy)\nforall x (Celluloid(x) and Prepupal(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nforall x (Parabolic(x) -> Prepupal(x))\nforall x (Parabolic(x) -> Prepupal(x))\n\nnot Cruddy(duffy)\n\nforall x (Prepupal(x) and Unwarmed(x) -> Cruddy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2154"} {"premises": "Virge is not viselike. Virge is successive. Virge is not squeaky. Virge is wrong. Cleland is not viselike. Cleland is squeaky. Cleland is weightless. Cleland is small. Cleland is wrong. Cleland is thundery. If Cleland is thundery then Cleland is weightless. Rough, viselike things are successive. If Cleland is not thundery then Cleland is wrong. All thundery, weightless things are small. Smart things are weightless. If something is wrong then it is weightless. Virge is small.", "logic": "\nnot Viselike(virge)\nSuccessive(virge)\nnot Squeaky(virge)\nWrong(virge)\nnot Viselike(cleland)\nSqueaky(cleland)\nWeightless(cleland)\nSmall(cleland)\nWrong(cleland)\nThundery(cleland)\nThundery(cleland) -> Weightless(cleland)\nforall x (Weightless(x) and Viselike(x) -> Successive(x))\nnot Thundery(cleland) -> Wrong(cleland)\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Weightless(x) -> Small(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Weightless(x))\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Weightless(x))\n\nSmall(virge)\n\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Weightless(x) -> Small(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2154"} {"premises": "Mag is icelandic. Roderigo is atlantic. Roderigo is parked. Roderigo is icelandic. Roderigo is basilican. Gonzalo is atlantic. Danyelle is embonpoint. If something is basilican and katabolic then it is atlantic. Nice things are embonpoint. Quiet things are atlantic. If something is unweaned then it is atlantic. White, katabolic things are parked. If Mag is icelandic and Mag is embonpoint then Mag is unweaned. Roderigo is icelandic.", "logic": "\nIcelandic(mag)\nAtlantic(roderigo)\nParked(roderigo)\nIcelandic(roderigo)\nBasilican(roderigo)\nAtlantic(gonzalo)\nEmbonpoint(danyelle)\nforall x (Basilican(x) and Katabolic(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Parked(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Unweaned(x) -> Atlantic(x))\nforall x (Basilican(x) and Katabolic(x) -> Parked(x))\nIcelandic(mag) and Embonpoint(mag) -> Unweaned(mag)\n\nIcelandic(roderigo)\n\ntherefore Icelandic(roderigo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-148"} {"premises": "Fonz is zillion. Malka is motiveless. Malka is abroad. Malka is zillion. Malka is polish. Kiley is motiveless. Rachel is dysphoric. If something is polish and cyan then it is motiveless. Nice things are dysphoric. Quiet things are motiveless. If something is photogenic then it is motiveless. White, cyan things are abroad. If Fonz is zillion and Fonz is dysphoric then Fonz is photogenic. Malka is not polish.", "logic": "\nZillion(fonz)\nMotiveless(malka)\nAbroad(malka)\nZillion(malka)\nPolish(malka)\nMotiveless(kiley)\nDysphoric(rachel)\nforall x (Polish(x) and Cyan(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Abroad(x) -> Dysphoric(x))\nforall x (Zillion(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Photogenic(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Polish(x) and Cyan(x) -> Abroad(x))\nZillion(fonz) and Dysphoric(fonz) -> Photogenic(fonz)\n\nnot Polish(malka)\n\ntherefore Polish(malka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-148"} {"premises": "Serena is unshelled. Bernadina is frantic. Bernadina is nicaean. Bernadina is unshelled. Bernadina is triangular. Zandra is frantic. Manny is stalinist. If something is triangular and nutritious then it is frantic. Nice things are stalinist. Quiet things are frantic. If something is populated then it is frantic. White, nutritious things are nicaean. If Serena is unshelled and Serena is stalinist then Serena is populated. Serena is not nicaean.", "logic": "\nUnshelled(serena)\nFrantic(bernadina)\nNicaean(bernadina)\nUnshelled(bernadina)\nTriangular(bernadina)\nFrantic(zandra)\nStalinist(manny)\nforall x (Triangular(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) -> Stalinist(x))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Populated(x) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Triangular(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Nicaean(x))\nUnshelled(serena) and Stalinist(serena) -> Populated(serena)\n\nnot Nicaean(serena)\n\nforall x (Triangular(x) and Nutritious(x) -> Nicaean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-148"} {"premises": "Yale is admired. Taylor is drafty. Taylor is undimmed. Taylor is admired. Taylor is napped. Atlanta is drafty. Isaiah is puffy. If something is napped and dualistic then it is drafty. Nice things are puffy. Quiet things are drafty. If something is bewitching then it is drafty. White, dualistic things are undimmed. If Yale is admired and Yale is puffy then Yale is bewitching. Atlanta is admired.", "logic": "\nAdmired(yale)\nDrafty(taylor)\nUndimmed(taylor)\nAdmired(taylor)\nNapped(taylor)\nDrafty(atlanta)\nPuffy(isaiah)\nforall x (Napped(x) and Dualistic(x) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Undimmed(x) -> Puffy(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Bewitching(x) -> Drafty(x))\nforall x (Napped(x) and Dualistic(x) -> Undimmed(x))\nAdmired(yale) and Puffy(yale) -> Bewitching(yale)\n\nAdmired(atlanta)\n\nAdmired(atlanta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-148"} {"premises": "Olympe is tubed. Olympe is brusk. Olympe is bellyless. Priscilla is rooted. Priscilla is blanketed. Priscilla is tubed. Priscilla is brusk. Priscilla is expandable. Priscilla is bellyless. Priscilla is tweedy. If someone is bellyless then they are rooted. If someone is brusk then they are tubed. If someone is blanketed then they are expandable. If Olympe is brusk and Olympe is expandable then Olympe is bellyless. If Priscilla is brusk and Priscilla is tweedy then Priscilla is blanketed. Red people are brusk. Priscilla is tubed.", "logic": "\nTubed(olympe)\nBrusk(olympe)\nBellyless(olympe)\nRooted(priscilla)\nBlanketed(priscilla)\nTubed(priscilla)\nBrusk(priscilla)\nExpandable(priscilla)\nBellyless(priscilla)\nTweedy(priscilla)\nforall x (Bellyless(x) -> Rooted(x))\nforall x (Brusk(x) -> Tubed(x))\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> Expandable(x))\nBrusk(olympe) and Expandable(olympe) -> Bellyless(olympe)\nBrusk(priscilla) and Tweedy(priscilla) -> Blanketed(priscilla)\nforall x (Bellyless(x) -> Brusk(x))\n\nTubed(priscilla)\n\ntherefore Tubed(priscilla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-898"} {"premises": "Ruben is slapdash. Ruben is britannic. Ruben is close. Cele is cerise. Cele is bladed. Cele is slapdash. Cele is britannic. Cele is federate. Cele is close. Cele is sunburned. If someone is close then they are cerise. If someone is britannic then they are slapdash. If someone is bladed then they are federate. If Ruben is britannic and Ruben is federate then Ruben is close. If Cele is britannic and Cele is sunburned then Cele is bladed. Red people are britannic. Ruben is not close.", "logic": "\nSlapdash(ruben)\nBritannic(ruben)\nClose(ruben)\nCerise(cele)\nBladed(cele)\nSlapdash(cele)\nBritannic(cele)\nFederate(cele)\nClose(cele)\nSunburned(cele)\nforall x (Close(x) -> Cerise(x))\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Slapdash(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) -> Federate(x))\nBritannic(ruben) and Federate(ruben) -> Close(ruben)\nBritannic(cele) and Sunburned(cele) -> Bladed(cele)\nforall x (Close(x) -> Britannic(x))\n\nnot Close(ruben)\n\ntherefore Close(ruben)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-898"} {"premises": "Nealon is cyclonic. Nealon is wimpish. Nealon is eightpenny. Happy is piggish. Happy is microbial. Happy is cyclonic. Happy is wimpish. Happy is tangible. Happy is eightpenny. Happy is venal. If someone is eightpenny then they are piggish. If someone is wimpish then they are cyclonic. If someone is microbial then they are tangible. If Nealon is wimpish and Nealon is tangible then Nealon is eightpenny. If Happy is wimpish and Happy is venal then Happy is microbial. Red people are wimpish. Nealon is piggish.", "logic": "\nCyclonic(nealon)\nWimpish(nealon)\nEightpenny(nealon)\nPiggish(happy)\nMicrobial(happy)\nCyclonic(happy)\nWimpish(happy)\nTangible(happy)\nEightpenny(happy)\nVenal(happy)\nforall x (Eightpenny(x) -> Piggish(x))\nforall x (Wimpish(x) -> Cyclonic(x))\nforall x (Microbial(x) -> Tangible(x))\nWimpish(nealon) and Tangible(nealon) -> Eightpenny(nealon)\nWimpish(happy) and Venal(happy) -> Microbial(happy)\nforall x (Eightpenny(x) -> Wimpish(x))\n\nPiggish(nealon)\n\nEightpenny(nealon) and forall x (Eightpenny(x) -> Piggish(x)) -> therefore Piggish(nealon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-898"} {"premises": "Magnus is jealous. Magnus is dishonored. Magnus is cashed. Jewel is gold. Jewel is racking. Jewel is jealous. Jewel is dishonored. Jewel is layered. Jewel is cashed. Jewel is actable. If someone is cashed then they are gold. If someone is dishonored then they are jealous. If someone is racking then they are layered. If Magnus is dishonored and Magnus is layered then Magnus is cashed. If Jewel is dishonored and Jewel is actable then Jewel is racking. Red people are dishonored. Magnus is not gold.", "logic": "\nJealous(magnus)\nDishonored(magnus)\nCashed(magnus)\nGold(jewel)\nRacking(jewel)\nJealous(jewel)\nDishonored(jewel)\nLayered(jewel)\nCashed(jewel)\nActable(jewel)\nforall x (Cashed(x) -> Gold(x))\nforall x (Dishonored(x) -> Jealous(x))\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Layered(x))\nDishonored(magnus) and Layered(magnus) -> Cashed(magnus)\nDishonored(jewel) and Actable(jewel) -> Racking(jewel)\nforall x (Cashed(x) -> Dishonored(x))\n\nnot Gold(magnus)\n\nCashed(magnus) and forall x (Cashed(x) -> Gold(x)) -> therefore Gold(magnus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-898"} {"premises": "Saxon is russet. Saxon is hempen. Saxon is togged. Tedmund is flustered. Tedmund is uncial. Tedmund is russet. Tedmund is hempen. Tedmund is uncombable. Tedmund is togged. Tedmund is appendaged. If someone is togged then they are flustered. If someone is hempen then they are russet. If someone is uncial then they are uncombable. If Saxon is hempen and Saxon is uncombable then Saxon is togged. If Tedmund is hempen and Tedmund is appendaged then Tedmund is uncial. Red people are hempen. Saxon is not uncombable.", "logic": "\nRusset(saxon)\nHempen(saxon)\nTogged(saxon)\nFlustered(tedmund)\nUncial(tedmund)\nRusset(tedmund)\nHempen(tedmund)\nUncombable(tedmund)\nTogged(tedmund)\nAppendaged(tedmund)\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Flustered(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Russet(x))\nforall x (Uncial(x) -> Uncombable(x))\nHempen(saxon) and Uncombable(saxon) -> Togged(saxon)\nHempen(tedmund) and Appendaged(tedmund) -> Uncial(tedmund)\nforall x (Togged(x) -> Hempen(x))\n\nnot Uncombable(saxon)\n\nforall x (Uncial(x) -> Uncombable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-898"} {"premises": "Lorianne is nonsense. Lorianne is natty. Lorianne is toed. Rozelle is pugilistic. Rozelle is blind. Rozelle is nonsense. Rozelle is natty. Rozelle is amebic. Rozelle is toed. Rozelle is unsporting. If someone is toed then they are pugilistic. If someone is natty then they are nonsense. If someone is blind then they are amebic. If Lorianne is natty and Lorianne is amebic then Lorianne is toed. If Rozelle is natty and Rozelle is unsporting then Rozelle is blind. Red people are natty. Lorianne is blind.", "logic": "\nNonsense(lorianne)\nNatty(lorianne)\nToed(lorianne)\nPugilistic(rozelle)\nBlind(rozelle)\nNonsense(rozelle)\nNatty(rozelle)\nAmebic(rozelle)\nToed(rozelle)\nUnsporting(rozelle)\nforall x (Toed(x) -> Pugilistic(x))\nforall x (Natty(x) -> Nonsense(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) -> Amebic(x))\nNatty(lorianne) and Amebic(lorianne) -> Toed(lorianne)\nNatty(rozelle) and Unsporting(rozelle) -> Blind(rozelle)\nforall x (Toed(x) -> Natty(x))\n\nBlind(lorianne)\n\nBlind(lorianne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-898"} {"premises": "Fabian is slumberous. Ephrayim is not unplanned. Christie is buteonine. All illegible people are not sandlike. If someone is sandlike and not unplanned then they are meritless. Red people are meritless. If Fabian is buteonine then Fabian is lukewarm. If someone is illegible and not sandlike then they are slumberous. Nice, slumberous people are lukewarm. Nice, meritless people are buteonine. Cold people are buteonine. Ephrayim is not unplanned.", "logic": "\nSlumberous(fabian)\nnot Unplanned(ephrayim)\nButeonine(christie)\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> not Sandlike(x))\nforall x (Sandlike(x) and not Unplanned(x) -> Meritless(x))\nforall x (Slumberous(x) -> Meritless(x))\nButeonine(fabian) -> Lukewarm(fabian)\nforall x (Illegible(x) and not Sandlike(x) -> Slumberous(x))\nforall x (Sandlike(x) and Slumberous(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\nforall x (Sandlike(x) and Meritless(x) -> Buteonine(x))\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Buteonine(x))\n\nnot Unplanned(ephrayim)\n\ntherefore not Unplanned(ephrayim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Rosalia is ascendible. Danette is not reasoning. Bernard is implicit. All uncousinly people are not automotive. If someone is automotive and not reasoning then they are vented. Red people are vented. If Rosalia is implicit then Rosalia is unfueled. If someone is uncousinly and not automotive then they are ascendible. Nice, ascendible people are unfueled. Nice, vented people are implicit. Cold people are implicit. Rosalia is not ascendible.", "logic": "\nAscendible(rosalia)\nnot Reasoning(danette)\nImplicit(bernard)\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) -> not Automotive(x))\nforall x (Automotive(x) and not Reasoning(x) -> Vented(x))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) -> Vented(x))\nImplicit(rosalia) -> Unfueled(rosalia)\nforall x (Uncousinly(x) and not Automotive(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Automotive(x) and Ascendible(x) -> Unfueled(x))\nforall x (Automotive(x) and Vented(x) -> Implicit(x))\nforall x (Vented(x) -> Implicit(x))\n\nnot Ascendible(rosalia)\n\ntherefore Ascendible(rosalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Channa is flowering. Abagael is not hardfisted. Reinhold is barbecued. All diseased people are not apocryphal. If someone is apocryphal and not hardfisted then they are smoothbore. Red people are smoothbore. If Channa is barbecued then Channa is medium. If someone is diseased and not apocryphal then they are flowering. Nice, flowering people are medium. Nice, smoothbore people are barbecued. Cold people are barbecued. Channa is smoothbore.", "logic": "\nFlowering(channa)\nnot Hardfisted(abagael)\nBarbecued(reinhold)\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> not Apocryphal(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and not Hardfisted(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Smoothbore(x))\nBarbecued(channa) -> Medium(channa)\nforall x (Diseased(x) and not Apocryphal(x) -> Flowering(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and Flowering(x) -> Medium(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and Smoothbore(x) -> Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) -> Barbecued(x))\n\nSmoothbore(channa)\n\nFlowering(channa) and forall x (Flowering(x) -> Smoothbore(x)) -> therefore Smoothbore(channa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Imelda is smoking. Maddi is not maternal. Wilmar is immoveable. All bewildered people are not downstair. If someone is downstair and not maternal then they are mantic. Red people are mantic. If Imelda is immoveable then Imelda is less. If someone is bewildered and not downstair then they are smoking. Nice, smoking people are less. Nice, mantic people are immoveable. Cold people are immoveable. Imelda is not mantic.", "logic": "\nSmoking(imelda)\nnot Maternal(maddi)\nImmoveable(wilmar)\nforall x (Bewildered(x) -> not Downstair(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and not Maternal(x) -> Mantic(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) -> Mantic(x))\nImmoveable(imelda) -> Less(imelda)\nforall x (Bewildered(x) and not Downstair(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Smoking(x) -> Less(x))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Mantic(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Mantic(x) -> Immoveable(x))\n\nnot Mantic(imelda)\n\nSmoking(imelda) and forall x (Smoking(x) -> Mantic(x)) -> therefore Mantic(imelda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Nanci is myeloid. Monica is not spheric. Mellisa is nonimmune. All pinstriped people are not dulled. If someone is dulled and not spheric then they are blackish. Red people are blackish. If Nanci is nonimmune then Nanci is oddish. If someone is pinstriped and not dulled then they are myeloid. Nice, myeloid people are oddish. Nice, blackish people are nonimmune. Cold people are nonimmune. Nanci is nonimmune.", "logic": "\nMyeloid(nanci)\nnot Spheric(monica)\nNonimmune(mellisa)\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) -> not Dulled(x))\nforall x (Dulled(x) and not Spheric(x) -> Blackish(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) -> Blackish(x))\nNonimmune(nanci) -> Oddish(nanci)\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) and not Dulled(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Dulled(x) and Myeloid(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Dulled(x) and Blackish(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\nforall x (Blackish(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\n\nNonimmune(nanci)\n\nMyeloid(nanci) and forall x (Myeloid(x) -> Blackish(x)) -> therefore Blackish(nanci) Blackish(nanci) and forall x (Blackish(x) -> Nonimmune(x)) -> therefore Nonimmune(nanci)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Chelsea is posterior. Britt is not atheist. Karee is suboceanic. All stemmed people are not clarifying. If someone is clarifying and not atheist then they are stirred. Red people are stirred. If Chelsea is suboceanic then Chelsea is crabwise. If someone is stemmed and not clarifying then they are posterior. Nice, posterior people are crabwise. Nice, stirred people are suboceanic. Cold people are suboceanic. Chelsea is not suboceanic.", "logic": "\nPosterior(chelsea)\nnot Atheist(britt)\nSuboceanic(karee)\nforall x (Stemmed(x) -> not Clarifying(x))\nforall x (Clarifying(x) and not Atheist(x) -> Stirred(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Stirred(x))\nSuboceanic(chelsea) -> Crabwise(chelsea)\nforall x (Stemmed(x) and not Clarifying(x) -> Posterior(x))\nforall x (Clarifying(x) and Posterior(x) -> Crabwise(x))\nforall x (Clarifying(x) and Stirred(x) -> Suboceanic(x))\nforall x (Stirred(x) -> Suboceanic(x))\n\nnot Suboceanic(chelsea)\n\nPosterior(chelsea) and forall x (Posterior(x) -> Stirred(x)) -> therefore Stirred(chelsea) Stirred(chelsea) and forall x (Stirred(x) -> Suboceanic(x)) -> therefore Suboceanic(chelsea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Chiquita is embonpoint. Emmit is not bastardly. Thom is bicentric. All tendinous people are not xxiii. If someone is xxiii and not bastardly then they are unbound. Red people are unbound. If Chiquita is bicentric then Chiquita is carangid. If someone is tendinous and not xxiii then they are embonpoint. Nice, embonpoint people are carangid. Nice, unbound people are bicentric. Cold people are bicentric. Chiquita is carangid.", "logic": "\nEmbonpoint(chiquita)\nnot Bastardly(emmit)\nBicentric(thom)\nforall x (Tendinous(x) -> not Xxiii(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) and not Bastardly(x) -> Unbound(x))\nforall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Unbound(x))\nBicentric(chiquita) -> Carangid(chiquita)\nforall x (Tendinous(x) and not Xxiii(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) and Embonpoint(x) -> Carangid(x))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) and Unbound(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Bicentric(x))\n\nCarangid(chiquita)\n\nEmbonpoint(chiquita) and forall x (Embonpoint(x) -> Unbound(x)) -> therefore Unbound(chiquita) Unbound(chiquita) and forall x (Unbound(x) -> Bicentric(x)) -> therefore Bicentric(chiquita) Bicentric(chiquita) and Bicentric(chiquita) -> Carangid(chiquita) -> therefore Carangid(chiquita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Claudius is cacophonic. Randell is not bumbling. Levin is homelike. All ungulate people are not crowned. If someone is crowned and not bumbling then they are misleading. Red people are misleading. If Claudius is homelike then Claudius is patchy. If someone is ungulate and not crowned then they are cacophonic. Nice, cacophonic people are patchy. Nice, misleading people are homelike. Cold people are homelike. Claudius is not patchy.", "logic": "\nCacophonic(claudius)\nnot Bumbling(randell)\nHomelike(levin)\nforall x (Ungulate(x) -> not Crowned(x))\nforall x (Crowned(x) and not Bumbling(x) -> Misleading(x))\nforall x (Cacophonic(x) -> Misleading(x))\nHomelike(claudius) -> Patchy(claudius)\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and not Crowned(x) -> Cacophonic(x))\nforall x (Crowned(x) and Cacophonic(x) -> Patchy(x))\nforall x (Crowned(x) and Misleading(x) -> Homelike(x))\nforall x (Misleading(x) -> Homelike(x))\n\nnot Patchy(claudius)\n\nCacophonic(claudius) and forall x (Cacophonic(x) -> Misleading(x)) -> therefore Misleading(claudius) Misleading(claudius) and forall x (Misleading(x) -> Homelike(x)) -> therefore Homelike(claudius) Homelike(claudius) and Homelike(claudius) -> Patchy(claudius) -> therefore Patchy(claudius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Aindrea is crossbred. Claudetta is not euphonical. Scarlett is incased. All alveolate people are not taoist. If someone is taoist and not euphonical then they are expendable. Red people are expendable. If Aindrea is incased then Aindrea is sedate. If someone is alveolate and not taoist then they are crossbred. Nice, crossbred people are sedate. Nice, expendable people are incased. Cold people are incased. Scarlett is not sedate.", "logic": "\nCrossbred(aindrea)\nnot Euphonical(claudetta)\nIncased(scarlett)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) -> not Taoist(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) and not Euphonical(x) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Crossbred(x) -> Expendable(x))\nIncased(aindrea) -> Sedate(aindrea)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) and not Taoist(x) -> Crossbred(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) and Crossbred(x) -> Sedate(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) and Expendable(x) -> Incased(x))\nforall x (Expendable(x) -> Incased(x))\n\nnot Sedate(scarlett)\n\nforall x (Taoist(x) and Crossbred(x) -> Sedate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Hamnet is varied. Audie is not appetent. Sly is slanting. All pavlovian people are not trackless. If someone is trackless and not appetent then they are spotty. Red people are spotty. If Hamnet is slanting then Hamnet is referent. If someone is pavlovian and not trackless then they are varied. Nice, varied people are referent. Nice, spotty people are slanting. Cold people are slanting. Audie is varied.", "logic": "\nVaried(hamnet)\nnot Appetent(audie)\nSlanting(sly)\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) -> not Trackless(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) and not Appetent(x) -> Spotty(x))\nforall x (Varied(x) -> Spotty(x))\nSlanting(hamnet) -> Referent(hamnet)\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) and not Trackless(x) -> Varied(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) and Varied(x) -> Referent(x))\nforall x (Trackless(x) and Spotty(x) -> Slanting(x))\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Slanting(x))\n\nVaried(audie)\n\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) and not Trackless(x) -> Varied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Ailyn is unbiassed. Celie is not opponent. Kin is maiden. All wriggly people are not proved. If someone is proved and not opponent then they are grouped. Red people are grouped. If Ailyn is maiden then Ailyn is strange. If someone is wriggly and not proved then they are unbiassed. Nice, unbiassed people are strange. Nice, grouped people are maiden. Cold people are maiden. Celie is not maiden.", "logic": "\nUnbiassed(ailyn)\nnot Opponent(celie)\nMaiden(kin)\nforall x (Wriggly(x) -> not Proved(x))\nforall x (Proved(x) and not Opponent(x) -> Grouped(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Grouped(x))\nMaiden(ailyn) -> Strange(ailyn)\nforall x (Wriggly(x) and not Proved(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Proved(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Strange(x))\nforall x (Proved(x) and Grouped(x) -> Maiden(x))\nforall x (Grouped(x) -> Maiden(x))\n\nnot Maiden(celie)\n\nforall x (Grouped(x) -> Maiden(x)) <- forall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Grouped(x)) <- forall x (Wriggly(x) and not Proved(x) -> Unbiassed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Langston is cenozoic. Alexei is not unironed. Redford is phantasmal. All principled people are not zygotic. If someone is zygotic and not unironed then they are airlike. Red people are airlike. If Langston is phantasmal then Langston is unfamiliar. If someone is principled and not zygotic then they are cenozoic. Nice, cenozoic people are unfamiliar. Nice, airlike people are phantasmal. Cold people are phantasmal. Alexei is unfamiliar.", "logic": "\nCenozoic(langston)\nnot Unironed(alexei)\nPhantasmal(redford)\nforall x (Principled(x) -> not Zygotic(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and not Unironed(x) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) -> Airlike(x))\nPhantasmal(langston) -> Unfamiliar(langston)\nforall x (Principled(x) and not Zygotic(x) -> Cenozoic(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and Cenozoic(x) -> Unfamiliar(x))\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and Airlike(x) -> Phantasmal(x))\nforall x (Airlike(x) -> Phantasmal(x))\n\nUnfamiliar(alexei)\n\nforall x (Zygotic(x) and Cenozoic(x) -> Unfamiliar(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Torr is buzzing. Kaitlyn is not basined. Dolora is parve. All canadian people are not informal. If someone is informal and not basined then they are columnar. Red people are columnar. If Torr is parve then Torr is escaped. If someone is canadian and not informal then they are buzzing. Nice, buzzing people are escaped. Nice, columnar people are parve. Cold people are parve. Dolora is not canadian.", "logic": "\nBuzzing(torr)\nnot Basined(kaitlyn)\nParve(dolora)\nforall x (Canadian(x) -> not Informal(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) and not Basined(x) -> Columnar(x))\nforall x (Buzzing(x) -> Columnar(x))\nParve(torr) -> Escaped(torr)\nforall x (Canadian(x) and not Informal(x) -> Buzzing(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) and Buzzing(x) -> Escaped(x))\nforall x (Informal(x) and Columnar(x) -> Parve(x))\nforall x (Columnar(x) -> Parve(x))\n\nnot Canadian(dolora)\n\nnot Canadian(dolora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Athene is anaclitic. Tabby is not foremost. Udall is blanched. All impeded people are not shockable. If someone is shockable and not foremost then they are miserly. Red people are miserly. If Athene is blanched then Athene is calceiform. If someone is impeded and not shockable then they are anaclitic. Nice, anaclitic people are calceiform. Nice, miserly people are blanched. Cold people are blanched. Athene is foremost.", "logic": "\nAnaclitic(athene)\nnot Foremost(tabby)\nBlanched(udall)\nforall x (Impeded(x) -> not Shockable(x))\nforall x (Shockable(x) and not Foremost(x) -> Miserly(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) -> Miserly(x))\nBlanched(athene) -> Calceiform(athene)\nforall x (Impeded(x) and not Shockable(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Shockable(x) and Anaclitic(x) -> Calceiform(x))\nforall x (Shockable(x) and Miserly(x) -> Blanched(x))\nforall x (Miserly(x) -> Blanched(x))\n\nForemost(athene)\n\nForemost(athene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Edward is penniless. Gershom is not auxetic. Wilona is grim. All tasteless people are not paradisiac. If someone is paradisiac and not auxetic then they are stubbled. Red people are stubbled. If Edward is grim then Edward is angelical. If someone is tasteless and not paradisiac then they are penniless. Nice, penniless people are angelical. Nice, stubbled people are grim. Cold people are grim. Edward is not tasteless.", "logic": "\nPenniless(edward)\nnot Auxetic(gershom)\nGrim(wilona)\nforall x (Tasteless(x) -> not Paradisiac(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) and not Auxetic(x) -> Stubbled(x))\nforall x (Penniless(x) -> Stubbled(x))\nGrim(edward) -> Angelical(edward)\nforall x (Tasteless(x) and not Paradisiac(x) -> Penniless(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) and Penniless(x) -> Angelical(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) and Stubbled(x) -> Grim(x))\nforall x (Stubbled(x) -> Grim(x))\n\nnot Tasteless(edward)\n\nnot Tasteless(edward) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "Vita is bimestrial. Billi is not anurous. Casia is visionary. All bulging people are not outraged. If someone is outraged and not anurous then they are afghani. Red people are afghani. If Vita is visionary then Vita is censurable. If someone is bulging and not outraged then they are bimestrial. Nice, bimestrial people are censurable. Nice, afghani people are visionary. Cold people are visionary. Casia is outraged.", "logic": "\nBimestrial(vita)\nnot Anurous(billi)\nVisionary(casia)\nforall x (Bulging(x) -> not Outraged(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) and not Anurous(x) -> Afghani(x))\nforall x (Bimestrial(x) -> Afghani(x))\nVisionary(vita) -> Censurable(vita)\nforall x (Bulging(x) and not Outraged(x) -> Bimestrial(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) and Bimestrial(x) -> Censurable(x))\nforall x (Outraged(x) and Afghani(x) -> Visionary(x))\nforall x (Afghani(x) -> Visionary(x))\n\nOutraged(casia)\n\nOutraged(casia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-343"} {"premises": "The reginauld disgust the blinny. The penn is unimpaired. The blinny undermine the penn. If the penn disgust the reginauld then the reginauld protest the blinny. If something is unimpaired then it disgust the reginauld. If something is deterrent and known then it protest the blinny. If something protest the blinny then the blinny undermine the reginauld. If something is unimpaired and known then it undermine the reginauld. If the penn is unimpaired and the blinny does not eat the penn then the penn does not like the reginauld. If something undermine the reginauld then the reginauld undermine the penn. If the blinny does not chase the reginauld and the blinny does not like the penn then the blinny does not chase the penn. The blinny undermine the penn.", "logic": "\nDisgust(reginauld, blinny)\nUnimpaired(penn)\nUndermine(blinny, penn)\nDisgust(penn, reginauld) -> Protest(reginauld, blinny)\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) -> Disgust(x, reginauld))\nforall x (Deterrent(x) and Known(x) -> Protest(x, blinny))\nforall x (Protest(x, blinny) -> Undermine(blinny, reginauld))\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) and Known(x) -> Undermine(x, reginauld))\nUnimpaired(penn) and not Disgust(blinny, penn) -> not Protest(penn, reginauld)\nforall x (Undermine(x, reginauld) -> Undermine(reginauld, penn))\nnot Undermine(blinny, reginauld) and not Protest(blinny, penn) -> not Undermine(blinny, penn)\n\nUndermine(blinny, penn)\n\ntherefore Undermine(blinny, penn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The paulette lurch the kendall. The dori is nepali. The kendall imbricate the dori. If the dori lurch the paulette then the paulette slime the kendall. If something is nepali then it lurch the paulette. If something is outsize and leakproof then it slime the kendall. If something slime the kendall then the kendall imbricate the paulette. If something is nepali and leakproof then it imbricate the paulette. If the dori is nepali and the kendall does not eat the dori then the dori does not like the paulette. If something imbricate the paulette then the paulette imbricate the dori. If the kendall does not chase the paulette and the kendall does not like the dori then the kendall does not chase the dori. The dori is not nepali.", "logic": "\nLurch(paulette, kendall)\nNepali(dori)\nImbricate(kendall, dori)\nLurch(dori, paulette) -> Slime(paulette, kendall)\nforall x (Nepali(x) -> Lurch(x, paulette))\nforall x (Outsize(x) and Leakproof(x) -> Slime(x, kendall))\nforall x (Slime(x, kendall) -> Imbricate(kendall, paulette))\nforall x (Nepali(x) and Leakproof(x) -> Imbricate(x, paulette))\nNepali(dori) and not Lurch(kendall, dori) -> not Slime(dori, paulette)\nforall x (Imbricate(x, paulette) -> Imbricate(paulette, dori))\nnot Imbricate(kendall, paulette) and not Slime(kendall, dori) -> not Imbricate(kendall, dori)\n\nnot Nepali(dori)\n\ntherefore Nepali(dori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The wilber disturb the artie. The torrey is adamant. The artie scourge the torrey. If the torrey disturb the wilber then the wilber apostatise the artie. If something is adamant then it disturb the wilber. If something is vacant and nectarous then it apostatise the artie. If something apostatise the artie then the artie scourge the wilber. If something is adamant and nectarous then it scourge the wilber. If the torrey is adamant and the artie does not eat the torrey then the torrey does not like the wilber. If something scourge the wilber then the wilber scourge the torrey. If the artie does not chase the wilber and the artie does not like the torrey then the artie does not chase the torrey. The torrey disturb the wilber.", "logic": "\nDisturb(wilber, artie)\nAdamant(torrey)\nScourge(artie, torrey)\nDisturb(torrey, wilber) -> Apostatise(wilber, artie)\nforall x (Adamant(x) -> Disturb(x, wilber))\nforall x (Vacant(x) and Nectarous(x) -> Apostatise(x, artie))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, artie) -> Scourge(artie, wilber))\nforall x (Adamant(x) and Nectarous(x) -> Scourge(x, wilber))\nAdamant(torrey) and not Disturb(artie, torrey) -> not Apostatise(torrey, wilber)\nforall x (Scourge(x, wilber) -> Scourge(wilber, torrey))\nnot Scourge(artie, wilber) and not Apostatise(artie, torrey) -> not Scourge(artie, torrey)\n\nDisturb(torrey, wilber)\n\nAdamant(torrey) and forall x (Adamant(x) -> Disturb(x, wilber)) -> therefore Disturb(torrey, wilber)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The woodie hibachi the theresina. The gwenore is sloshed. The theresina echo the gwenore. If the gwenore hibachi the woodie then the woodie activate the theresina. If something is sloshed then it hibachi the woodie. If something is hebraical and unimpeded then it activate the theresina. If something activate the theresina then the theresina echo the woodie. If something is sloshed and unimpeded then it echo the woodie. If the gwenore is sloshed and the theresina does not eat the gwenore then the gwenore does not like the woodie. If something echo the woodie then the woodie echo the gwenore. If the theresina does not chase the woodie and the theresina does not like the gwenore then the theresina does not chase the gwenore. The gwenore does not eat the woodie.", "logic": "\nHibachi(woodie, theresina)\nSloshed(gwenore)\nEcho(theresina, gwenore)\nHibachi(gwenore, woodie) -> Activate(woodie, theresina)\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Hibachi(x, woodie))\nforall x (Hebraical(x) and Unimpeded(x) -> Activate(x, theresina))\nforall x (Activate(x, theresina) -> Echo(theresina, woodie))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) and Unimpeded(x) -> Echo(x, woodie))\nSloshed(gwenore) and not Hibachi(theresina, gwenore) -> not Activate(gwenore, woodie)\nforall x (Echo(x, woodie) -> Echo(woodie, gwenore))\nnot Echo(theresina, woodie) and not Activate(theresina, gwenore) -> not Echo(theresina, gwenore)\n\nnot Hibachi(gwenore, woodie)\n\nSloshed(gwenore) and forall x (Sloshed(x) -> Hibachi(x, woodie)) -> therefore Hibachi(gwenore, woodie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The warner reassail the dwight. The darrin is grapey. The dwight span the darrin. If the darrin reassail the warner then the warner slash the dwight. If something is grapey then it reassail the warner. If something is drinkable and pleochroic then it slash the dwight. If something slash the dwight then the dwight span the warner. If something is grapey and pleochroic then it span the warner. If the darrin is grapey and the dwight does not eat the darrin then the darrin does not like the warner. If something span the warner then the warner span the darrin. If the dwight does not chase the warner and the dwight does not like the darrin then the dwight does not chase the darrin. The warner slash the dwight.", "logic": "\nReassail(warner, dwight)\nGrapey(darrin)\nSpan(dwight, darrin)\nReassail(darrin, warner) -> Slash(warner, dwight)\nforall x (Grapey(x) -> Reassail(x, warner))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) and Pleochroic(x) -> Slash(x, dwight))\nforall x (Slash(x, dwight) -> Span(dwight, warner))\nforall x (Grapey(x) and Pleochroic(x) -> Span(x, warner))\nGrapey(darrin) and not Reassail(dwight, darrin) -> not Slash(darrin, warner)\nforall x (Span(x, warner) -> Span(warner, darrin))\nnot Span(dwight, warner) and not Slash(dwight, darrin) -> not Span(dwight, darrin)\n\nSlash(warner, dwight)\n\nGrapey(darrin) and forall x (Grapey(x) -> Reassail(x, warner)) -> therefore Reassail(darrin, warner) Reassail(darrin, warner) and Reassail(darrin, warner) -> Slash(warner, dwight) -> therefore Slash(warner, dwight)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The chase manoeuvre the levy. The annabel is increased. The levy lour the annabel. If the annabel manoeuvre the chase then the chase fine the levy. If something is increased then it manoeuvre the chase. If something is shambolic and idealized then it fine the levy. If something fine the levy then the levy lour the chase. If something is increased and idealized then it lour the chase. If the annabel is increased and the levy does not eat the annabel then the annabel does not like the chase. If something lour the chase then the chase lour the annabel. If the levy does not chase the chase and the levy does not like the annabel then the levy does not chase the annabel. The chase does not like the levy.", "logic": "\nManoeuvre(chase, levy)\nIncreased(annabel)\nLour(levy, annabel)\nManoeuvre(annabel, chase) -> Fine(chase, levy)\nforall x (Increased(x) -> Manoeuvre(x, chase))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Idealized(x) -> Fine(x, levy))\nforall x (Fine(x, levy) -> Lour(levy, chase))\nforall x (Increased(x) and Idealized(x) -> Lour(x, chase))\nIncreased(annabel) and not Manoeuvre(levy, annabel) -> not Fine(annabel, chase)\nforall x (Lour(x, chase) -> Lour(chase, annabel))\nnot Lour(levy, chase) and not Fine(levy, annabel) -> not Lour(levy, annabel)\n\nnot Fine(chase, levy)\n\nIncreased(annabel) and forall x (Increased(x) -> Manoeuvre(x, chase)) -> therefore Manoeuvre(annabel, chase) Manoeuvre(annabel, chase) and Manoeuvre(annabel, chase) -> Fine(chase, levy) -> therefore Fine(chase, levy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The sheffie incense the werner. The ramonda is unaccented. The werner roll the ramonda. If the ramonda incense the sheffie then the sheffie condescend the werner. If something is unaccented then it incense the sheffie. If something is bisontine and meditative then it condescend the werner. If something condescend the werner then the werner roll the sheffie. If something is unaccented and meditative then it roll the sheffie. If the ramonda is unaccented and the werner does not eat the ramonda then the ramonda does not like the sheffie. If something roll the sheffie then the sheffie roll the ramonda. If the werner does not chase the sheffie and the werner does not like the ramonda then the werner does not chase the ramonda. The werner roll the sheffie.", "logic": "\nIncense(sheffie, werner)\nUnaccented(ramonda)\nRoll(werner, ramonda)\nIncense(ramonda, sheffie) -> Condescend(sheffie, werner)\nforall x (Unaccented(x) -> Incense(x, sheffie))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) and Meditative(x) -> Condescend(x, werner))\nforall x (Condescend(x, werner) -> Roll(werner, sheffie))\nforall x (Unaccented(x) and Meditative(x) -> Roll(x, sheffie))\nUnaccented(ramonda) and not Incense(werner, ramonda) -> not Condescend(ramonda, sheffie)\nforall x (Roll(x, sheffie) -> Roll(sheffie, ramonda))\nnot Roll(werner, sheffie) and not Condescend(werner, ramonda) -> not Roll(werner, ramonda)\n\nRoll(werner, sheffie)\n\nUnaccented(ramonda) and forall x (Unaccented(x) -> Incense(x, sheffie)) -> therefore Incense(ramonda, sheffie) Incense(ramonda, sheffie) and Incense(ramonda, sheffie) -> Condescend(sheffie, werner) -> therefore Condescend(sheffie, werner) Condescend(sheffie, werner) and forall x (Condescend(x, werner) -> Roll(werner, sheffie)) -> therefore Roll(werner, sheffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The reta retransmit the wilden. The martelle is softened. The wilden unburden the martelle. If the martelle retransmit the reta then the reta despatch the wilden. If something is softened then it retransmit the reta. If something is even and epiphyseal then it despatch the wilden. If something despatch the wilden then the wilden unburden the reta. If something is softened and epiphyseal then it unburden the reta. If the martelle is softened and the wilden does not eat the martelle then the martelle does not like the reta. If something unburden the reta then the reta unburden the martelle. If the wilden does not chase the reta and the wilden does not like the martelle then the wilden does not chase the martelle. The wilden does not chase the reta.", "logic": "\nRetransmit(reta, wilden)\nSoftened(martelle)\nUnburden(wilden, martelle)\nRetransmit(martelle, reta) -> Despatch(reta, wilden)\nforall x (Softened(x) -> Retransmit(x, reta))\nforall x (Even(x) and Epiphyseal(x) -> Despatch(x, wilden))\nforall x (Despatch(x, wilden) -> Unburden(wilden, reta))\nforall x (Softened(x) and Epiphyseal(x) -> Unburden(x, reta))\nSoftened(martelle) and not Retransmit(wilden, martelle) -> not Despatch(martelle, reta)\nforall x (Unburden(x, reta) -> Unburden(reta, martelle))\nnot Unburden(wilden, reta) and not Despatch(wilden, martelle) -> not Unburden(wilden, martelle)\n\nnot Unburden(wilden, reta)\n\nSoftened(martelle) and forall x (Softened(x) -> Retransmit(x, reta)) -> therefore Retransmit(martelle, reta) Retransmit(martelle, reta) and Retransmit(martelle, reta) -> Despatch(reta, wilden) -> therefore Despatch(reta, wilden) Despatch(reta, wilden) and forall x (Despatch(x, wilden) -> Unburden(wilden, reta)) -> therefore Unburden(wilden, reta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The edwina revamp the louisa. The uri is cytotoxic. The louisa obturate the uri. If the uri revamp the edwina then the edwina malinger the louisa. If something is cytotoxic then it revamp the edwina. If something is ventricous and melodic then it malinger the louisa. If something malinger the louisa then the louisa obturate the edwina. If something is cytotoxic and melodic then it obturate the edwina. If the uri is cytotoxic and the louisa does not eat the uri then the uri does not like the edwina. If something obturate the edwina then the edwina obturate the uri. If the louisa does not chase the edwina and the louisa does not like the uri then the louisa does not chase the uri. The uri does not like the louisa.", "logic": "\nRevamp(edwina, louisa)\nCytotoxic(uri)\nObturate(louisa, uri)\nRevamp(uri, edwina) -> Malinger(edwina, louisa)\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Revamp(x, edwina))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and Melodic(x) -> Malinger(x, louisa))\nforall x (Malinger(x, louisa) -> Obturate(louisa, edwina))\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) and Melodic(x) -> Obturate(x, edwina))\nCytotoxic(uri) and not Revamp(louisa, uri) -> not Malinger(uri, edwina)\nforall x (Obturate(x, edwina) -> Obturate(edwina, uri))\nnot Obturate(louisa, edwina) and not Malinger(louisa, uri) -> not Obturate(louisa, uri)\n\nnot Malinger(uri, louisa)\n\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and Melodic(x) -> Malinger(x, louisa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The merry congee the vicki. The bab is captive. The vicki jolly the bab. If the bab congee the merry then the merry unstuff the vicki. If something is captive then it congee the merry. If something is copious and burbly then it unstuff the vicki. If something unstuff the vicki then the vicki jolly the merry. If something is captive and burbly then it jolly the merry. If the bab is captive and the vicki does not eat the bab then the bab does not like the merry. If something jolly the merry then the merry jolly the bab. If the vicki does not chase the merry and the vicki does not like the bab then the vicki does not chase the bab. The vicki unstuff the vicki.", "logic": "\nCongee(merry, vicki)\nCaptive(bab)\nJolly(vicki, bab)\nCongee(bab, merry) -> Unstuff(merry, vicki)\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Congee(x, merry))\nforall x (Copious(x) and Burbly(x) -> Unstuff(x, vicki))\nforall x (Unstuff(x, vicki) -> Jolly(vicki, merry))\nforall x (Captive(x) and Burbly(x) -> Jolly(x, merry))\nCaptive(bab) and not Congee(vicki, bab) -> not Unstuff(bab, merry)\nforall x (Jolly(x, merry) -> Jolly(merry, bab))\nnot Jolly(vicki, merry) and not Unstuff(vicki, bab) -> not Jolly(vicki, bab)\n\nUnstuff(vicki, vicki)\n\nforall x (Copious(x) and Burbly(x) -> Unstuff(x, vicki)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The patty unharness the sybille. The imojean is neoliberal. The sybille mate the imojean. If the imojean unharness the patty then the patty calve the sybille. If something is neoliberal then it unharness the patty. If something is sublunar and canned then it calve the sybille. If something calve the sybille then the sybille mate the patty. If something is neoliberal and canned then it mate the patty. If the imojean is neoliberal and the sybille does not eat the imojean then the imojean does not like the patty. If something mate the patty then the patty mate the imojean. If the sybille does not chase the patty and the sybille does not like the imojean then the sybille does not chase the imojean. The patty does not eat the patty.", "logic": "\nUnharness(patty, sybille)\nNeoliberal(imojean)\nMate(sybille, imojean)\nUnharness(imojean, patty) -> Calve(patty, sybille)\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Unharness(x, patty))\nforall x (Sublunar(x) and Canned(x) -> Calve(x, sybille))\nforall x (Calve(x, sybille) -> Mate(sybille, patty))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Canned(x) -> Mate(x, patty))\nNeoliberal(imojean) and not Unharness(sybille, imojean) -> not Calve(imojean, patty)\nforall x (Mate(x, patty) -> Mate(patty, imojean))\nnot Mate(sybille, patty) and not Calve(sybille, imojean) -> not Mate(sybille, imojean)\n\nnot Unharness(patty, patty)\n\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Unharness(x, patty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The nolan decouple the lucio. The dorelia is less. The lucio lignify the dorelia. If the dorelia decouple the nolan then the nolan beaver the lucio. If something is less then it decouple the nolan. If something is holophytic and calorific then it beaver the lucio. If something beaver the lucio then the lucio lignify the nolan. If something is less and calorific then it lignify the nolan. If the dorelia is less and the lucio does not eat the dorelia then the dorelia does not like the nolan. If something lignify the nolan then the nolan lignify the dorelia. If the lucio does not chase the nolan and the lucio does not like the dorelia then the lucio does not chase the dorelia. The dorelia lignify the nolan.", "logic": "\nDecouple(nolan, lucio)\nLess(dorelia)\nLignify(lucio, dorelia)\nDecouple(dorelia, nolan) -> Beaver(nolan, lucio)\nforall x (Less(x) -> Decouple(x, nolan))\nforall x (Holophytic(x) and Calorific(x) -> Beaver(x, lucio))\nforall x (Beaver(x, lucio) -> Lignify(lucio, nolan))\nforall x (Less(x) and Calorific(x) -> Lignify(x, nolan))\nLess(dorelia) and not Decouple(lucio, dorelia) -> not Beaver(dorelia, nolan)\nforall x (Lignify(x, nolan) -> Lignify(nolan, dorelia))\nnot Lignify(lucio, nolan) and not Beaver(lucio, dorelia) -> not Lignify(lucio, dorelia)\n\nLignify(dorelia, nolan)\n\nforall x (Less(x) and Calorific(x) -> Lignify(x, nolan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The cyb purr the ethel. The crawford is praetorial. The ethel unlearn the crawford. If the crawford purr the cyb then the cyb vent the ethel. If something is praetorial then it purr the cyb. If something is disunited and centered then it vent the ethel. If something vent the ethel then the ethel unlearn the cyb. If something is praetorial and centered then it unlearn the cyb. If the crawford is praetorial and the ethel does not eat the crawford then the crawford does not like the cyb. If something unlearn the cyb then the cyb unlearn the crawford. If the ethel does not chase the cyb and the ethel does not like the crawford then the ethel does not chase the crawford. The crawford does not chase the crawford.", "logic": "\nPurr(cyb, ethel)\nPraetorial(crawford)\nUnlearn(ethel, crawford)\nPurr(crawford, cyb) -> Vent(cyb, ethel)\nforall x (Praetorial(x) -> Purr(x, cyb))\nforall x (Disunited(x) and Centered(x) -> Vent(x, ethel))\nforall x (Vent(x, ethel) -> Unlearn(ethel, cyb))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) and Centered(x) -> Unlearn(x, cyb))\nPraetorial(crawford) and not Purr(ethel, crawford) -> not Vent(crawford, cyb)\nforall x (Unlearn(x, cyb) -> Unlearn(cyb, crawford))\nnot Unlearn(ethel, cyb) and not Vent(ethel, crawford) -> not Unlearn(ethel, crawford)\n\nnot Unlearn(crawford, crawford)\n\nnot Unlearn(crawford, crawford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The kettie overcook the marius. The albina is wizen. The marius reform the albina. If the albina overcook the kettie then the kettie flute the marius. If something is wizen then it overcook the kettie. If something is zoonotic and assurgent then it flute the marius. If something flute the marius then the marius reform the kettie. If something is wizen and assurgent then it reform the kettie. If the albina is wizen and the marius does not eat the albina then the albina does not like the kettie. If something reform the kettie then the kettie reform the albina. If the marius does not chase the kettie and the marius does not like the albina then the marius does not chase the albina. The kettie is zoonotic.", "logic": "\nOvercook(kettie, marius)\nWizen(albina)\nReform(marius, albina)\nOvercook(albina, kettie) -> Flute(kettie, marius)\nforall x (Wizen(x) -> Overcook(x, kettie))\nforall x (Zoonotic(x) and Assurgent(x) -> Flute(x, marius))\nforall x (Flute(x, marius) -> Reform(marius, kettie))\nforall x (Wizen(x) and Assurgent(x) -> Reform(x, kettie))\nWizen(albina) and not Overcook(marius, albina) -> not Flute(albina, kettie)\nforall x (Reform(x, kettie) -> Reform(kettie, albina))\nnot Reform(marius, kettie) and not Flute(marius, albina) -> not Reform(marius, albina)\n\nZoonotic(kettie)\n\nZoonotic(kettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The shelden defervesce the duke. The ellene is aery. The duke transcribe the ellene. If the ellene defervesce the shelden then the shelden print the duke. If something is aery then it defervesce the shelden. If something is wonted and pent then it print the duke. If something print the duke then the duke transcribe the shelden. If something is aery and pent then it transcribe the shelden. If the ellene is aery and the duke does not eat the ellene then the ellene does not like the shelden. If something transcribe the shelden then the shelden transcribe the ellene. If the duke does not chase the shelden and the duke does not like the ellene then the duke does not chase the ellene. The shelden is not kind.", "logic": "\nDefervesce(shelden, duke)\nAery(ellene)\nTranscribe(duke, ellene)\nDefervesce(ellene, shelden) -> Print(shelden, duke)\nforall x (Aery(x) -> Defervesce(x, shelden))\nforall x (Wonted(x) and Pent(x) -> Print(x, duke))\nforall x (Print(x, duke) -> Transcribe(duke, shelden))\nforall x (Aery(x) and Pent(x) -> Transcribe(x, shelden))\nAery(ellene) and not Defervesce(duke, ellene) -> not Print(ellene, shelden)\nforall x (Transcribe(x, shelden) -> Transcribe(shelden, ellene))\nnot Transcribe(duke, shelden) and not Print(duke, ellene) -> not Transcribe(duke, ellene)\n\nnot Kind(shelden)\n\nnot Kind(shelden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "The steven explore the pammi. The montague is tortured. The pammi mail the montague. If the montague explore the steven then the steven fantasize the pammi. If something is tortured then it explore the steven. If something is arborical and pendent then it fantasize the pammi. If something fantasize the pammi then the pammi mail the steven. If something is tortured and pendent then it mail the steven. If the montague is tortured and the pammi does not eat the montague then the montague does not like the steven. If something mail the steven then the steven mail the montague. If the pammi does not chase the steven and the pammi does not like the montague then the pammi does not chase the montague. The montague mail the pammi.", "logic": "\nExplore(steven, pammi)\nTortured(montague)\nMail(pammi, montague)\nExplore(montague, steven) -> Fantasize(steven, pammi)\nforall x (Tortured(x) -> Explore(x, steven))\nforall x (Arborical(x) and Pendent(x) -> Fantasize(x, pammi))\nforall x (Fantasize(x, pammi) -> Mail(pammi, steven))\nforall x (Tortured(x) and Pendent(x) -> Mail(x, steven))\nTortured(montague) and not Explore(pammi, montague) -> not Fantasize(montague, steven)\nforall x (Mail(x, steven) -> Mail(steven, montague))\nnot Mail(pammi, steven) and not Fantasize(pammi, montague) -> not Mail(pammi, montague)\n\nMail(montague, pammi)\n\nMail(montague, pammi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-600"} {"premises": "Bertrand is sweetened. Bertrand is overseas. Bertrand is conforming. Bertrand is albinistic. Bertrand is trimotored. Bertrand is southern. Bertrand is perianal. Matelda is sweetened. Matelda is conforming. Matelda is albinistic. Matelda is southern. Matelda is perianal. Maxfield is sweetened. Maxfield is conforming. Maxfield is southern. All overseas, conforming things are southern. All albinistic, trimotored things are southern. Matelda is albinistic.", "logic": "\nSweetened(bertrand)\nOverseas(bertrand)\nConforming(bertrand)\nAlbinistic(bertrand)\nTrimotored(bertrand)\nSouthern(bertrand)\nPerianal(bertrand)\nSweetened(matelda)\nConforming(matelda)\nAlbinistic(matelda)\nSouthern(matelda)\nPerianal(matelda)\nSweetened(maxfield)\nConforming(maxfield)\nSouthern(maxfield)\nforall x (Overseas(x) and Conforming(x) -> Southern(x))\nforall x (Albinistic(x) and Trimotored(x) -> Southern(x))\n\nAlbinistic(matelda)\n\ntherefore Albinistic(matelda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5628"} {"premises": "Dexter is broad. Dexter is contrary. Dexter is proficient. Dexter is aforesaid. Dexter is handsewn. Dexter is bellyless. Dexter is randomized. Tine is broad. Tine is proficient. Tine is aforesaid. Tine is bellyless. Tine is randomized. Hercules is broad. Hercules is proficient. Hercules is bellyless. All contrary, proficient things are bellyless. All aforesaid, handsewn things are bellyless. Dexter is not proficient.", "logic": "\nBroad(dexter)\nContrary(dexter)\nProficient(dexter)\nAforesaid(dexter)\nHandsewn(dexter)\nBellyless(dexter)\nRandomized(dexter)\nBroad(tine)\nProficient(tine)\nAforesaid(tine)\nBellyless(tine)\nRandomized(tine)\nBroad(hercules)\nProficient(hercules)\nBellyless(hercules)\nforall x (Contrary(x) and Proficient(x) -> Bellyless(x))\nforall x (Aforesaid(x) and Handsewn(x) -> Bellyless(x))\n\nnot Proficient(dexter)\n\ntherefore Proficient(dexter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5628"} {"premises": "Sparky is abbatial. Sparky is vertical. Sparky is glad. Sparky is unbaptized. Sparky is cyprian. Sparky is bhutanese. Sparky is dubitable. Maggi is abbatial. Maggi is glad. Maggi is unbaptized. Maggi is bhutanese. Maggi is dubitable. Alecia is abbatial. Alecia is glad. Alecia is bhutanese. All vertical, glad things are bhutanese. All unbaptized, cyprian things are bhutanese. Maggi is not vertical.", "logic": "\nAbbatial(sparky)\nVertical(sparky)\nGlad(sparky)\nUnbaptized(sparky)\nCyprian(sparky)\nBhutanese(sparky)\nDubitable(sparky)\nAbbatial(maggi)\nGlad(maggi)\nUnbaptized(maggi)\nBhutanese(maggi)\nDubitable(maggi)\nAbbatial(alecia)\nGlad(alecia)\nBhutanese(alecia)\nforall x (Vertical(x) and Glad(x) -> Bhutanese(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) and Cyprian(x) -> Bhutanese(x))\n\nnot Vertical(maggi)\n\nnot Vertical(maggi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5628"} {"premises": "Zorina is slushy. Zorina is moribund. Zorina is reasonless. Zorina is shipshape. Zorina is passing. Zorina is aroused. Zorina is incertain. Justine is slushy. Justine is reasonless. Justine is shipshape. Justine is aroused. Justine is incertain. Cornelle is slushy. Cornelle is reasonless. Cornelle is aroused. All moribund, reasonless things are aroused. All shipshape, passing things are aroused. Cornelle is passing.", "logic": "\nSlushy(zorina)\nMoribund(zorina)\nReasonless(zorina)\nShipshape(zorina)\nPassing(zorina)\nAroused(zorina)\nIncertain(zorina)\nSlushy(justine)\nReasonless(justine)\nShipshape(justine)\nAroused(justine)\nIncertain(justine)\nSlushy(cornelle)\nReasonless(cornelle)\nAroused(cornelle)\nforall x (Moribund(x) and Reasonless(x) -> Aroused(x))\nforall x (Shipshape(x) and Passing(x) -> Aroused(x))\n\nPassing(cornelle)\n\nPassing(cornelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5628"} {"premises": "Rivi is primed. Rivi is foldable. Zacherie is clayey. Zacherie is nimble. Patsy is pent. Rosemarie is brindle. Rosemarie is nimble. If Patsy is pent then Patsy is foldable. Young things are primed. Red, nimble things are hypnagogic. All primed things are foldable. If something is foldable and nimble then it is brindle. Young things are hypnagogic. Rivi is foldable.", "logic": "\nPrimed(rivi)\nFoldable(rivi)\nClayey(zacherie)\nNimble(zacherie)\nPent(patsy)\nBrindle(rosemarie)\nNimble(rosemarie)\nPent(patsy) -> Foldable(patsy)\nforall x (Nimble(x) -> Primed(x))\nforall x (Foldable(x) and Nimble(x) -> Hypnagogic(x))\nforall x (Primed(x) -> Foldable(x))\nforall x (Foldable(x) and Nimble(x) -> Brindle(x))\nforall x (Nimble(x) -> Hypnagogic(x))\n\nFoldable(rivi)\n\ntherefore Foldable(rivi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Hugo is anabatic. Hugo is gathered. Gino is inaccurate. Gino is yugoslav. Claresta is thrilling. Nelsen is spiffy. Nelsen is yugoslav. If Claresta is thrilling then Claresta is gathered. Young things are anabatic. Red, yugoslav things are kingly. All anabatic things are gathered. If something is gathered and yugoslav then it is spiffy. Young things are kingly. Nelsen is not spiffy.", "logic": "\nAnabatic(hugo)\nGathered(hugo)\nInaccurate(gino)\nYugoslav(gino)\nThrilling(claresta)\nSpiffy(nelsen)\nYugoslav(nelsen)\nThrilling(claresta) -> Gathered(claresta)\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nforall x (Gathered(x) and Yugoslav(x) -> Kingly(x))\nforall x (Anabatic(x) -> Gathered(x))\nforall x (Gathered(x) and Yugoslav(x) -> Spiffy(x))\nforall x (Yugoslav(x) -> Kingly(x))\n\nnot Spiffy(nelsen)\n\ntherefore Spiffy(nelsen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Shawna is piercing. Shawna is quilted. Katina is scraggly. Katina is unflavored. Maurine is centennial. Sinead is hesitant. Sinead is unflavored. If Maurine is centennial then Maurine is quilted. Young things are piercing. Red, unflavored things are apractic. All piercing things are quilted. If something is quilted and unflavored then it is hesitant. Young things are apractic. Maurine is quilted.", "logic": "\nPiercing(shawna)\nQuilted(shawna)\nScraggly(katina)\nUnflavored(katina)\nCentennial(maurine)\nHesitant(sinead)\nUnflavored(sinead)\nCentennial(maurine) -> Quilted(maurine)\nforall x (Unflavored(x) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Quilted(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Apractic(x))\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Quilted(x))\nforall x (Quilted(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Hesitant(x))\nforall x (Unflavored(x) -> Apractic(x))\n\nQuilted(maurine)\n\nCentennial(maurine) and Centennial(maurine) -> Quilted(maurine) -> therefore Quilted(maurine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Ethelyn is vacuolated. Ethelyn is binocular. Nanete is cadenced. Nanete is plangent. Hiro is reserved. Kary is secular. Kary is plangent. If Hiro is reserved then Hiro is binocular. Young things are vacuolated. Red, plangent things are soapy. All vacuolated things are binocular. If something is binocular and plangent then it is secular. Young things are soapy. Nanete is not soapy.", "logic": "\nVacuolated(ethelyn)\nBinocular(ethelyn)\nCadenced(nanete)\nPlangent(nanete)\nReserved(hiro)\nSecular(kary)\nPlangent(kary)\nReserved(hiro) -> Binocular(hiro)\nforall x (Plangent(x) -> Vacuolated(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) and Plangent(x) -> Soapy(x))\nforall x (Vacuolated(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) and Plangent(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Plangent(x) -> Soapy(x))\n\nnot Soapy(nanete)\n\nPlangent(nanete) and forall x (Plangent(x) -> Soapy(x)) -> therefore Soapy(nanete)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Bernette is obese. Bernette is jovian. Frank is nightly. Frank is taupe. Queenie is included. Ignace is acidulous. Ignace is taupe. If Queenie is included then Queenie is jovian. Young things are obese. Red, taupe things are possessed. All obese things are jovian. If something is jovian and taupe then it is acidulous. Young things are possessed. Frank is jovian.", "logic": "\nObese(bernette)\nJovian(bernette)\nNightly(frank)\nTaupe(frank)\nIncluded(queenie)\nAcidulous(ignace)\nTaupe(ignace)\nIncluded(queenie) -> Jovian(queenie)\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Obese(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) and Taupe(x) -> Possessed(x))\nforall x (Obese(x) -> Jovian(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) and Taupe(x) -> Acidulous(x))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Possessed(x))\n\nJovian(frank)\n\nTaupe(frank) and forall x (Taupe(x) -> Obese(x)) -> therefore Obese(frank) Obese(frank) and forall x (Obese(x) -> Jovian(x)) -> therefore Jovian(frank)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Derron is spirituous. Derron is median. Hyatt is percipient. Hyatt is dreamlike. Prentice is dyspnoeic. Judah is orange. Judah is dreamlike. If Prentice is dyspnoeic then Prentice is median. Young things are spirituous. Red, dreamlike things are billiard. All spirituous things are median. If something is median and dreamlike then it is orange. Young things are billiard. Judah is not median.", "logic": "\nSpirituous(derron)\nMedian(derron)\nPercipient(hyatt)\nDreamlike(hyatt)\nDyspnoeic(prentice)\nOrange(judah)\nDreamlike(judah)\nDyspnoeic(prentice) -> Median(prentice)\nforall x (Dreamlike(x) -> Spirituous(x))\nforall x (Median(x) and Dreamlike(x) -> Billiard(x))\nforall x (Spirituous(x) -> Median(x))\nforall x (Median(x) and Dreamlike(x) -> Orange(x))\nforall x (Dreamlike(x) -> Billiard(x))\n\nnot Median(judah)\n\nDreamlike(judah) and forall x (Dreamlike(x) -> Spirituous(x)) -> therefore Spirituous(judah) Spirituous(judah) and forall x (Spirituous(x) -> Median(x)) -> therefore Median(judah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Margot is extricable. Margot is sagittate. Jorey is unpunished. Jorey is pastel. Maxie is scripted. Emmett is feral. Emmett is pastel. If Maxie is scripted then Maxie is sagittate. Young things are extricable. Red, pastel things are coming. All extricable things are sagittate. If something is sagittate and pastel then it is feral. Young things are coming. Jorey is feral.", "logic": "\nExtricable(margot)\nSagittate(margot)\nUnpunished(jorey)\nPastel(jorey)\nScripted(maxie)\nFeral(emmett)\nPastel(emmett)\nScripted(maxie) -> Sagittate(maxie)\nforall x (Pastel(x) -> Extricable(x))\nforall x (Sagittate(x) and Pastel(x) -> Coming(x))\nforall x (Extricable(x) -> Sagittate(x))\nforall x (Sagittate(x) and Pastel(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Pastel(x) -> Coming(x))\n\nFeral(jorey)\n\nPastel(jorey) and forall x (Pastel(x) -> Extricable(x)) -> therefore Extricable(jorey) Extricable(jorey) and forall x (Extricable(x) -> Sagittate(x)) -> therefore Sagittate(jorey) Sagittate(jorey) and Pastel(jorey) and forall x (Sagittate(x) and Pastel(x) -> Feral(x)) -> therefore Feral(jorey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Elbertina is guiding. Elbertina is epicarpal. Alfonzo is syrian. Alfonzo is brindle. Godiva is aspirant. Gunner is agleam. Gunner is brindle. If Godiva is aspirant then Godiva is epicarpal. Young things are guiding. Red, brindle things are vermicular. All guiding things are epicarpal. If something is epicarpal and brindle then it is agleam. Young things are vermicular. Alfonzo is not agleam.", "logic": "\nGuiding(elbertina)\nEpicarpal(elbertina)\nSyrian(alfonzo)\nBrindle(alfonzo)\nAspirant(godiva)\nAgleam(gunner)\nBrindle(gunner)\nAspirant(godiva) -> Epicarpal(godiva)\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Guiding(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) and Brindle(x) -> Vermicular(x))\nforall x (Guiding(x) -> Epicarpal(x))\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) and Brindle(x) -> Agleam(x))\nforall x (Brindle(x) -> Vermicular(x))\n\nnot Agleam(alfonzo)\n\nBrindle(alfonzo) and forall x (Brindle(x) -> Guiding(x)) -> therefore Guiding(alfonzo) Guiding(alfonzo) and forall x (Guiding(x) -> Epicarpal(x)) -> therefore Epicarpal(alfonzo) Epicarpal(alfonzo) and Brindle(alfonzo) and forall x (Epicarpal(x) and Brindle(x) -> Agleam(x)) -> therefore Agleam(alfonzo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Geraldo is unedited. Geraldo is mechanized. Hendrika is largish. Hendrika is chadian. Wyatt is infantile. Delphine is honored. Delphine is chadian. If Wyatt is infantile then Wyatt is mechanized. Young things are unedited. Red, chadian things are abactinal. All unedited things are mechanized. If something is mechanized and chadian then it is honored. Young things are abactinal. Wyatt is not unedited.", "logic": "\nUnedited(geraldo)\nMechanized(geraldo)\nLargish(hendrika)\nChadian(hendrika)\nInfantile(wyatt)\nHonored(delphine)\nChadian(delphine)\nInfantile(wyatt) -> Mechanized(wyatt)\nforall x (Chadian(x) -> Unedited(x))\nforall x (Mechanized(x) and Chadian(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Unedited(x) -> Mechanized(x))\nforall x (Mechanized(x) and Chadian(x) -> Honored(x))\nforall x (Chadian(x) -> Abactinal(x))\n\nnot Unedited(wyatt)\n\nforall x (Chadian(x) -> Unedited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Ruthy is accessory. Ruthy is huffish. Tammi is protracted. Tammi is thoughtful. Chastity is sculpted. Alethea is criminal. Alethea is thoughtful. If Chastity is sculpted then Chastity is huffish. Young things are accessory. Red, thoughtful things are retarded. All accessory things are huffish. If something is huffish and thoughtful then it is criminal. Young things are retarded. Chastity is criminal.", "logic": "\nAccessory(ruthy)\nHuffish(ruthy)\nProtracted(tammi)\nThoughtful(tammi)\nSculpted(chastity)\nCriminal(alethea)\nThoughtful(alethea)\nSculpted(chastity) -> Huffish(chastity)\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) -> Accessory(x))\nforall x (Huffish(x) and Thoughtful(x) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Accessory(x) -> Huffish(x))\nforall x (Huffish(x) and Thoughtful(x) -> Criminal(x))\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) -> Retarded(x))\n\nCriminal(chastity)\n\nforall x (Huffish(x) and Thoughtful(x) -> Criminal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Wayne is acoustic. Wayne is thirtieth. Josiah is unwitting. Josiah is thermoset. Blisse is eupneic. Mitra is eldest. Mitra is thermoset. If Blisse is eupneic then Blisse is thirtieth. Young things are acoustic. Red, thermoset things are finical. All acoustic things are thirtieth. If something is thirtieth and thermoset then it is eldest. Young things are finical. Wayne is not finical.", "logic": "\nAcoustic(wayne)\nThirtieth(wayne)\nUnwitting(josiah)\nThermoset(josiah)\nEupneic(blisse)\nEldest(mitra)\nThermoset(mitra)\nEupneic(blisse) -> Thirtieth(blisse)\nforall x (Thermoset(x) -> Acoustic(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Thermoset(x) -> Finical(x))\nforall x (Acoustic(x) -> Thirtieth(x))\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Thermoset(x) -> Eldest(x))\nforall x (Thermoset(x) -> Finical(x))\n\nnot Finical(wayne)\n\nforall x (Thirtieth(x) and Thermoset(x) -> Finical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Chelsie is cacophonic. Chelsie is embezzled. Joleen is ruminant. Joleen is sleepless. Binni is failing. Umeko is rifled. Umeko is sleepless. If Binni is failing then Binni is embezzled. Young things are cacophonic. Red, sleepless things are deckled. All cacophonic things are embezzled. If something is embezzled and sleepless then it is rifled. Young things are deckled. Chelsie is rifled.", "logic": "\nCacophonic(chelsie)\nEmbezzled(chelsie)\nRuminant(joleen)\nSleepless(joleen)\nFailing(binni)\nRifled(umeko)\nSleepless(umeko)\nFailing(binni) -> Embezzled(binni)\nforall x (Sleepless(x) -> Cacophonic(x))\nforall x (Embezzled(x) and Sleepless(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Cacophonic(x) -> Embezzled(x))\nforall x (Embezzled(x) and Sleepless(x) -> Rifled(x))\nforall x (Sleepless(x) -> Deckled(x))\n\nRifled(chelsie)\n\nforall x (Embezzled(x) and Sleepless(x) -> Rifled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Courtney is caring. Courtney is unswerving. Spike is staring. Spike is sarcoid. Sheree is sedulous. Theadora is mesodermal. Theadora is sarcoid. If Sheree is sedulous then Sheree is unswerving. Young things are caring. Red, sarcoid things are sodden. All caring things are unswerving. If something is unswerving and sarcoid then it is mesodermal. Young things are sodden. Courtney is not staring.", "logic": "\nCaring(courtney)\nUnswerving(courtney)\nStaring(spike)\nSarcoid(spike)\nSedulous(sheree)\nMesodermal(theadora)\nSarcoid(theadora)\nSedulous(sheree) -> Unswerving(sheree)\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) -> Caring(x))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) and Sarcoid(x) -> Sodden(x))\nforall x (Caring(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Unswerving(x) and Sarcoid(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Sarcoid(x) -> Sodden(x))\n\nnot Staring(courtney)\n\nnot Staring(courtney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Kinna is saleable. Kinna is cropped. Melamie is benign. Melamie is inveterate. Gloriana is executed. Gabbi is posted. Gabbi is inveterate. If Gloriana is executed then Gloriana is cropped. Young things are saleable. Red, inveterate things are ataractic. All saleable things are cropped. If something is cropped and inveterate then it is posted. Young things are ataractic. Kinna is inveterate.", "logic": "\nSaleable(kinna)\nCropped(kinna)\nBenign(melamie)\nInveterate(melamie)\nExecuted(gloriana)\nPosted(gabbi)\nInveterate(gabbi)\nExecuted(gloriana) -> Cropped(gloriana)\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Saleable(x))\nforall x (Cropped(x) and Inveterate(x) -> Ataractic(x))\nforall x (Saleable(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Cropped(x) and Inveterate(x) -> Posted(x))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Ataractic(x))\n\nInveterate(kinna)\n\nInveterate(kinna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Rock is shipboard. Rock is sabahan. Deana is consumable. Deana is laryngeal. Theodore is cheeselike. Berte is uric. Berte is laryngeal. If Theodore is cheeselike then Theodore is sabahan. Young things are shipboard. Red, laryngeal things are correlated. All shipboard things are sabahan. If something is sabahan and laryngeal then it is uric. Young things are correlated. Theodore is not laryngeal.", "logic": "\nShipboard(rock)\nSabahan(rock)\nConsumable(deana)\nLaryngeal(deana)\nCheeselike(theodore)\nUric(berte)\nLaryngeal(berte)\nCheeselike(theodore) -> Sabahan(theodore)\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Shipboard(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) and Laryngeal(x) -> Correlated(x))\nforall x (Shipboard(x) -> Sabahan(x))\nforall x (Sabahan(x) and Laryngeal(x) -> Uric(x))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Correlated(x))\n\nnot Laryngeal(theodore)\n\nnot Laryngeal(theodore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "Joela is swagger. Joela is unimpeded. Corby is ironed. Corby is impartial. Karen is pinchbeck. Dinah is syncarpous. Dinah is impartial. If Karen is pinchbeck then Karen is unimpeded. Young things are swagger. Red, impartial things are easterly. All swagger things are unimpeded. If something is unimpeded and impartial then it is syncarpous. Young things are easterly. Joela is pinchbeck.", "logic": "\nSwagger(joela)\nUnimpeded(joela)\nIroned(corby)\nImpartial(corby)\nPinchbeck(karen)\nSyncarpous(dinah)\nImpartial(dinah)\nPinchbeck(karen) -> Unimpeded(karen)\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Swagger(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) and Impartial(x) -> Easterly(x))\nforall x (Swagger(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nforall x (Unimpeded(x) and Impartial(x) -> Syncarpous(x))\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Easterly(x))\n\nPinchbeck(joela)\n\nPinchbeck(joela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1552"} {"premises": "The letty groom the elmer. The letty groom the genna. The letty is unobliging. The letty is proofed. The letty fantasy the genna. The elmer balloon the letty. The elmer balloon the genna. The elmer groom the letty. The genna balloon the elmer. The genna is unobliging. The genna is designed. The genna is unilateral. If the letty balloon the genna then the letty balloon the elmer. If the letty balloon the genna then the genna groom the letty. If something fantasy the genna then the genna is recreant. If something is designed and proofed then it does not chase the letty. If something is recreant then it is proofed. If something is proofed and it does not eat the elmer then it does not need the letty. The genna is designed.", "logic": "\nGroom(letty, elmer)\nGroom(letty, genna)\nUnobliging(letty)\nProofed(letty)\nFantasy(letty, genna)\nBalloon(elmer, letty)\nBalloon(elmer, genna)\nGroom(elmer, letty)\nBalloon(genna, elmer)\nUnobliging(genna)\nDesigned(genna)\nUnilateral(genna)\nBalloon(letty, genna) -> Balloon(letty, elmer)\nBalloon(letty, genna) -> Groom(genna, letty)\nforall x (Fantasy(x, genna) -> Recreant(genna))\nforall x (Designed(x) and Proofed(x) -> not Balloon(x, letty))\nforall x (Recreant(x) -> Proofed(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) and not Groom(x, elmer) -> not Fantasy(x, letty))\n\nDesigned(genna)\n\ntherefore Designed(genna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The lay oxygenise the welbie. The lay oxygenise the staffard. The lay is auriform. The lay is foolish. The lay prepossess the staffard. The welbie unpin the lay. The welbie unpin the staffard. The welbie oxygenise the lay. The staffard unpin the welbie. The staffard is auriform. The staffard is alternate. The staffard is bilocular. If the lay unpin the staffard then the lay unpin the welbie. If the lay unpin the staffard then the staffard oxygenise the lay. If something prepossess the staffard then the staffard is fifty. If something is alternate and foolish then it does not chase the lay. If something is fifty then it is foolish. If something is foolish and it does not eat the welbie then it does not need the lay. The lay does not need the staffard.", "logic": "\nOxygenise(lay, welbie)\nOxygenise(lay, staffard)\nAuriform(lay)\nFoolish(lay)\nPrepossess(lay, staffard)\nUnpin(welbie, lay)\nUnpin(welbie, staffard)\nOxygenise(welbie, lay)\nUnpin(staffard, welbie)\nAuriform(staffard)\nAlternate(staffard)\nBilocular(staffard)\nUnpin(lay, staffard) -> Unpin(lay, welbie)\nUnpin(lay, staffard) -> Oxygenise(staffard, lay)\nforall x (Prepossess(x, staffard) -> Fifty(staffard))\nforall x (Alternate(x) and Foolish(x) -> not Unpin(x, lay))\nforall x (Fifty(x) -> Foolish(x))\nforall x (Foolish(x) and not Oxygenise(x, welbie) -> not Prepossess(x, lay))\n\nnot Prepossess(lay, staffard)\n\ntherefore Prepossess(lay, staffard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The zandra yack the norton. The zandra yack the bekki. The zandra is symphonic. The zandra is unerect. The zandra cruise the bekki. The norton except the zandra. The norton except the bekki. The norton yack the zandra. The bekki except the norton. The bekki is symphonic. The bekki is peccable. The bekki is enchained. If the zandra except the bekki then the zandra except the norton. If the zandra except the bekki then the bekki yack the zandra. If something cruise the bekki then the bekki is sensitive. If something is peccable and unerect then it does not chase the zandra. If something is sensitive then it is unerect. If something is unerect and it does not eat the norton then it does not need the zandra. The bekki is sensitive.", "logic": "\nYack(zandra, norton)\nYack(zandra, bekki)\nSymphonic(zandra)\nUnerect(zandra)\nCruise(zandra, bekki)\nExcept(norton, zandra)\nExcept(norton, bekki)\nYack(norton, zandra)\nExcept(bekki, norton)\nSymphonic(bekki)\nPeccable(bekki)\nEnchained(bekki)\nExcept(zandra, bekki) -> Except(zandra, norton)\nExcept(zandra, bekki) -> Yack(bekki, zandra)\nforall x (Cruise(x, bekki) -> Sensitive(bekki))\nforall x (Peccable(x) and Unerect(x) -> not Except(x, zandra))\nforall x (Sensitive(x) -> Unerect(x))\nforall x (Unerect(x) and not Yack(x, norton) -> not Cruise(x, zandra))\n\nSensitive(bekki)\n\nCruise(zandra, bekki) and forall x (Cruise(x, bekki) -> Sensitive(bekki)) -> therefore Sensitive(bekki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The fanya savor the leonid. The fanya savor the arabel. The fanya is alpine. The fanya is duncical. The fanya white the arabel. The leonid sibilate the fanya. The leonid sibilate the arabel. The leonid savor the fanya. The arabel sibilate the leonid. The arabel is alpine. The arabel is blasting. The arabel is mellow. If the fanya sibilate the arabel then the fanya sibilate the leonid. If the fanya sibilate the arabel then the arabel savor the fanya. If something white the arabel then the arabel is lentic. If something is blasting and duncical then it does not chase the fanya. If something is lentic then it is duncical. If something is duncical and it does not eat the leonid then it does not need the fanya. The arabel is not lentic.", "logic": "\nSavor(fanya, leonid)\nSavor(fanya, arabel)\nAlpine(fanya)\nDuncical(fanya)\nWhite(fanya, arabel)\nSibilate(leonid, fanya)\nSibilate(leonid, arabel)\nSavor(leonid, fanya)\nSibilate(arabel, leonid)\nAlpine(arabel)\nBlasting(arabel)\nMellow(arabel)\nSibilate(fanya, arabel) -> Sibilate(fanya, leonid)\nSibilate(fanya, arabel) -> Savor(arabel, fanya)\nforall x (White(x, arabel) -> Lentic(arabel))\nforall x (Blasting(x) and Duncical(x) -> not Sibilate(x, fanya))\nforall x (Lentic(x) -> Duncical(x))\nforall x (Duncical(x) and not Savor(x, leonid) -> not White(x, fanya))\n\nnot Lentic(arabel)\n\nWhite(fanya, arabel) and forall x (White(x, arabel) -> Lentic(arabel)) -> therefore Lentic(arabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The elicia crush the burton. The elicia crush the ertha. The elicia is tactual. The elicia is razed. The elicia chaperon the ertha. The burton alibi the elicia. The burton alibi the ertha. The burton crush the elicia. The ertha alibi the burton. The ertha is tactual. The ertha is mealy. The ertha is enthralled. If the elicia alibi the ertha then the elicia alibi the burton. If the elicia alibi the ertha then the ertha crush the elicia. If something chaperon the ertha then the ertha is meritable. If something is mealy and razed then it does not chase the elicia. If something is meritable then it is razed. If something is razed and it does not eat the burton then it does not need the elicia. The ertha is razed.", "logic": "\nCrush(elicia, burton)\nCrush(elicia, ertha)\nTactual(elicia)\nRazed(elicia)\nChaperon(elicia, ertha)\nAlibi(burton, elicia)\nAlibi(burton, ertha)\nCrush(burton, elicia)\nAlibi(ertha, burton)\nTactual(ertha)\nMealy(ertha)\nEnthralled(ertha)\nAlibi(elicia, ertha) -> Alibi(elicia, burton)\nAlibi(elicia, ertha) -> Crush(ertha, elicia)\nforall x (Chaperon(x, ertha) -> Meritable(ertha))\nforall x (Mealy(x) and Razed(x) -> not Alibi(x, elicia))\nforall x (Meritable(x) -> Razed(x))\nforall x (Razed(x) and not Crush(x, burton) -> not Chaperon(x, elicia))\n\nRazed(ertha)\n\nChaperon(elicia, ertha) and forall x (Chaperon(x, ertha) -> Meritable(ertha)) -> therefore Meritable(ertha) Meritable(ertha) and forall x (Meritable(x) -> Razed(x)) -> therefore Razed(ertha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The cleopatra tighten the dorita. The cleopatra tighten the fortuna. The cleopatra is appendant. The cleopatra is sharpened. The cleopatra commission the fortuna. The dorita energise the cleopatra. The dorita energise the fortuna. The dorita tighten the cleopatra. The fortuna energise the dorita. The fortuna is appendant. The fortuna is piercing. The fortuna is faddy. If the cleopatra energise the fortuna then the cleopatra energise the dorita. If the cleopatra energise the fortuna then the fortuna tighten the cleopatra. If something commission the fortuna then the fortuna is anxious. If something is piercing and sharpened then it does not chase the cleopatra. If something is anxious then it is sharpened. If something is sharpened and it does not eat the dorita then it does not need the cleopatra. The fortuna is not sharpened.", "logic": "\nTighten(cleopatra, dorita)\nTighten(cleopatra, fortuna)\nAppendant(cleopatra)\nSharpened(cleopatra)\nCommission(cleopatra, fortuna)\nEnergise(dorita, cleopatra)\nEnergise(dorita, fortuna)\nTighten(dorita, cleopatra)\nEnergise(fortuna, dorita)\nAppendant(fortuna)\nPiercing(fortuna)\nFaddy(fortuna)\nEnergise(cleopatra, fortuna) -> Energise(cleopatra, dorita)\nEnergise(cleopatra, fortuna) -> Tighten(fortuna, cleopatra)\nforall x (Commission(x, fortuna) -> Anxious(fortuna))\nforall x (Piercing(x) and Sharpened(x) -> not Energise(x, cleopatra))\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Sharpened(x))\nforall x (Sharpened(x) and not Tighten(x, dorita) -> not Commission(x, cleopatra))\n\nnot Sharpened(fortuna)\n\nCommission(cleopatra, fortuna) and forall x (Commission(x, fortuna) -> Anxious(fortuna)) -> therefore Anxious(fortuna) Anxious(fortuna) and forall x (Anxious(x) -> Sharpened(x)) -> therefore Sharpened(fortuna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The goose hawk the tasha. The goose hawk the bette. The goose is opencast. The goose is oxidizable. The goose interleave the bette. The tasha whimper the goose. The tasha whimper the bette. The tasha hawk the goose. The bette whimper the tasha. The bette is opencast. The bette is unpleasant. The bette is separative. If the goose whimper the bette then the goose whimper the tasha. If the goose whimper the bette then the bette hawk the goose. If something interleave the bette then the bette is costless. If something is unpleasant and oxidizable then it does not chase the goose. If something is costless then it is oxidizable. If something is oxidizable and it does not eat the tasha then it does not need the goose. The bette does not chase the goose.", "logic": "\nHawk(goose, tasha)\nHawk(goose, bette)\nOpencast(goose)\nOxidizable(goose)\nInterleave(goose, bette)\nWhimper(tasha, goose)\nWhimper(tasha, bette)\nHawk(tasha, goose)\nWhimper(bette, tasha)\nOpencast(bette)\nUnpleasant(bette)\nSeparative(bette)\nWhimper(goose, bette) -> Whimper(goose, tasha)\nWhimper(goose, bette) -> Hawk(bette, goose)\nforall x (Interleave(x, bette) -> Costless(bette))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Oxidizable(x) -> not Whimper(x, goose))\nforall x (Costless(x) -> Oxidizable(x))\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) and not Hawk(x, tasha) -> not Interleave(x, goose))\n\nnot Whimper(bette, goose)\n\nInterleave(goose, bette) and forall x (Interleave(x, bette) -> Costless(bette)) -> therefore Costless(bette) Costless(bette) and forall x (Costless(x) -> Oxidizable(x)) -> therefore Oxidizable(bette) Unpleasant(bette) and Oxidizable(bette) and forall x (Unpleasant(x) and Oxidizable(x) -> not Whimper(x, goose)) -> therefore not Whimper(bette, goose)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The francois airbrush the maynard. The francois airbrush the moise. The francois is chiasmal. The francois is sparkly. The francois sideswipe the moise. The maynard crisscross the francois. The maynard crisscross the moise. The maynard airbrush the francois. The moise crisscross the maynard. The moise is chiasmal. The moise is bedridden. The moise is novel. If the francois crisscross the moise then the francois crisscross the maynard. If the francois crisscross the moise then the moise airbrush the francois. If something sideswipe the moise then the moise is crushing. If something is bedridden and sparkly then it does not chase the francois. If something is crushing then it is sparkly. If something is sparkly and it does not eat the maynard then it does not need the francois. The moise crisscross the francois.", "logic": "\nAirbrush(francois, maynard)\nAirbrush(francois, moise)\nChiasmal(francois)\nSparkly(francois)\nSideswipe(francois, moise)\nCrisscross(maynard, francois)\nCrisscross(maynard, moise)\nAirbrush(maynard, francois)\nCrisscross(moise, maynard)\nChiasmal(moise)\nBedridden(moise)\nNovel(moise)\nCrisscross(francois, moise) -> Crisscross(francois, maynard)\nCrisscross(francois, moise) -> Airbrush(moise, francois)\nforall x (Sideswipe(x, moise) -> Crushing(moise))\nforall x (Bedridden(x) and Sparkly(x) -> not Crisscross(x, francois))\nforall x (Crushing(x) -> Sparkly(x))\nforall x (Sparkly(x) and not Airbrush(x, maynard) -> not Sideswipe(x, francois))\n\nCrisscross(moise, francois)\n\nSideswipe(francois, moise) and forall x (Sideswipe(x, moise) -> Crushing(moise)) -> therefore Crushing(moise) Crushing(moise) and forall x (Crushing(x) -> Sparkly(x)) -> therefore Sparkly(moise) Bedridden(moise) and Sparkly(moise) and forall x (Bedridden(x) and Sparkly(x) -> not Crisscross(x, francois)) -> therefore not Crisscross(moise, francois)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The isaac airmail the wendy. The isaac airmail the theodora. The isaac is nonleaded. The isaac is biface. The isaac impair the theodora. The wendy teetotal the isaac. The wendy teetotal the theodora. The wendy airmail the isaac. The theodora teetotal the wendy. The theodora is nonleaded. The theodora is nonliving. The theodora is jumbo. If the isaac teetotal the theodora then the isaac teetotal the wendy. If the isaac teetotal the theodora then the theodora airmail the isaac. If something impair the theodora then the theodora is saline. If something is nonliving and biface then it does not chase the isaac. If something is saline then it is biface. If something is biface and it does not eat the wendy then it does not need the isaac. The wendy is not biface.", "logic": "\nAirmail(isaac, wendy)\nAirmail(isaac, theodora)\nNonleaded(isaac)\nBiface(isaac)\nImpair(isaac, theodora)\nTeetotal(wendy, isaac)\nTeetotal(wendy, theodora)\nAirmail(wendy, isaac)\nTeetotal(theodora, wendy)\nNonleaded(theodora)\nNonliving(theodora)\nJumbo(theodora)\nTeetotal(isaac, theodora) -> Teetotal(isaac, wendy)\nTeetotal(isaac, theodora) -> Airmail(theodora, isaac)\nforall x (Impair(x, theodora) -> Saline(theodora))\nforall x (Nonliving(x) and Biface(x) -> not Teetotal(x, isaac))\nforall x (Saline(x) -> Biface(x))\nforall x (Biface(x) and not Airmail(x, wendy) -> not Impair(x, isaac))\n\nnot Biface(wendy)\n\nforall x (Saline(x) -> Biface(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The tasia tittup the waring. The tasia tittup the brandy. The tasia is endogenous. The tasia is backmost. The tasia distance the brandy. The waring dishearten the tasia. The waring dishearten the brandy. The waring tittup the tasia. The brandy dishearten the waring. The brandy is endogenous. The brandy is virtual. The brandy is falconine. If the tasia dishearten the brandy then the tasia dishearten the waring. If the tasia dishearten the brandy then the brandy tittup the tasia. If something distance the brandy then the brandy is admonitory. If something is virtual and backmost then it does not chase the tasia. If something is admonitory then it is backmost. If something is backmost and it does not eat the waring then it does not need the tasia. The brandy tittup the tasia.", "logic": "\nTittup(tasia, waring)\nTittup(tasia, brandy)\nEndogenous(tasia)\nBackmost(tasia)\nDistance(tasia, brandy)\nDishearten(waring, tasia)\nDishearten(waring, brandy)\nTittup(waring, tasia)\nDishearten(brandy, waring)\nEndogenous(brandy)\nVirtual(brandy)\nFalconine(brandy)\nDishearten(tasia, brandy) -> Dishearten(tasia, waring)\nDishearten(tasia, brandy) -> Tittup(brandy, tasia)\nforall x (Distance(x, brandy) -> Admonitory(brandy))\nforall x (Virtual(x) and Backmost(x) -> not Dishearten(x, tasia))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) -> Backmost(x))\nforall x (Backmost(x) and not Tittup(x, waring) -> not Distance(x, tasia))\n\nTittup(brandy, tasia)\n\nDishearten(tasia, brandy) -> Tittup(brandy, tasia) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The gina arise the sherman. The gina arise the desaree. The gina is manageable. The gina is balletic. The gina respire the desaree. The sherman profess the gina. The sherman profess the desaree. The sherman arise the gina. The desaree profess the sherman. The desaree is manageable. The desaree is gallican. The desaree is svelte. If the gina profess the desaree then the gina profess the sherman. If the gina profess the desaree then the desaree arise the gina. If something respire the desaree then the desaree is unassisted. If something is gallican and balletic then it does not chase the gina. If something is unassisted then it is balletic. If something is balletic and it does not eat the sherman then it does not need the gina. The gina does not chase the sherman.", "logic": "\nArise(gina, sherman)\nArise(gina, desaree)\nManageable(gina)\nBalletic(gina)\nRespire(gina, desaree)\nProfess(sherman, gina)\nProfess(sherman, desaree)\nArise(sherman, gina)\nProfess(desaree, sherman)\nManageable(desaree)\nGallican(desaree)\nSvelte(desaree)\nProfess(gina, desaree) -> Profess(gina, sherman)\nProfess(gina, desaree) -> Arise(desaree, gina)\nforall x (Respire(x, desaree) -> Unassisted(desaree))\nforall x (Gallican(x) and Balletic(x) -> not Profess(x, gina))\nforall x (Unassisted(x) -> Balletic(x))\nforall x (Balletic(x) and not Arise(x, sherman) -> not Respire(x, gina))\n\nnot Profess(gina, sherman)\n\nProfess(gina, desaree) -> Profess(gina, sherman) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The roxi delist the joyous. The roxi delist the kaile. The roxi is spectral. The roxi is revengeful. The roxi bunker the kaile. The joyous abdicate the roxi. The joyous abdicate the kaile. The joyous delist the roxi. The kaile abdicate the joyous. The kaile is spectral. The kaile is tolerant. The kaile is cycloidal. If the roxi abdicate the kaile then the roxi abdicate the joyous. If the roxi abdicate the kaile then the kaile delist the roxi. If something bunker the kaile then the kaile is viewless. If something is tolerant and revengeful then it does not chase the roxi. If something is viewless then it is revengeful. If something is revengeful and it does not eat the joyous then it does not need the roxi. The roxi is viewless.", "logic": "\nDelist(roxi, joyous)\nDelist(roxi, kaile)\nSpectral(roxi)\nRevengeful(roxi)\nBunker(roxi, kaile)\nAbdicate(joyous, roxi)\nAbdicate(joyous, kaile)\nDelist(joyous, roxi)\nAbdicate(kaile, joyous)\nSpectral(kaile)\nTolerant(kaile)\nCycloidal(kaile)\nAbdicate(roxi, kaile) -> Abdicate(roxi, joyous)\nAbdicate(roxi, kaile) -> Delist(kaile, roxi)\nforall x (Bunker(x, kaile) -> Viewless(kaile))\nforall x (Tolerant(x) and Revengeful(x) -> not Abdicate(x, roxi))\nforall x (Viewless(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) and not Delist(x, joyous) -> not Bunker(x, roxi))\n\nViewless(roxi)\n\nViewless(roxi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The glynda wharf the lazare. The glynda wharf the titus. The glynda is sham. The glynda is unblushing. The glynda unsnarl the titus. The lazare renew the glynda. The lazare renew the titus. The lazare wharf the glynda. The titus renew the lazare. The titus is sham. The titus is meager. The titus is luteal. If the glynda renew the titus then the glynda renew the lazare. If the glynda renew the titus then the titus wharf the glynda. If something unsnarl the titus then the titus is impelling. If something is meager and unblushing then it does not chase the glynda. If something is impelling then it is unblushing. If something is unblushing and it does not eat the lazare then it does not need the glynda. The titus does not need the titus.", "logic": "\nWharf(glynda, lazare)\nWharf(glynda, titus)\nSham(glynda)\nUnblushing(glynda)\nUnsnarl(glynda, titus)\nRenew(lazare, glynda)\nRenew(lazare, titus)\nWharf(lazare, glynda)\nRenew(titus, lazare)\nSham(titus)\nMeager(titus)\nLuteal(titus)\nRenew(glynda, titus) -> Renew(glynda, lazare)\nRenew(glynda, titus) -> Wharf(titus, glynda)\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, titus) -> Impelling(titus))\nforall x (Meager(x) and Unblushing(x) -> not Renew(x, glynda))\nforall x (Impelling(x) -> Unblushing(x))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and not Wharf(x, lazare) -> not Unsnarl(x, glynda))\n\nnot Unsnarl(titus, titus)\n\nnot Unsnarl(titus, titus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The cornelius plunge the regina. The cornelius plunge the eduard. The cornelius is carpellate. The cornelius is anapaestic. The cornelius convict the eduard. The regina sphacelate the cornelius. The regina sphacelate the eduard. The regina plunge the cornelius. The eduard sphacelate the regina. The eduard is carpellate. The eduard is congested. The eduard is renewed. If the cornelius sphacelate the eduard then the cornelius sphacelate the regina. If the cornelius sphacelate the eduard then the eduard plunge the cornelius. If something convict the eduard then the eduard is dressy. If something is congested and anapaestic then it does not chase the cornelius. If something is dressy then it is anapaestic. If something is anapaestic and it does not eat the regina then it does not need the cornelius. The regina is carpellate.", "logic": "\nPlunge(cornelius, regina)\nPlunge(cornelius, eduard)\nCarpellate(cornelius)\nAnapaestic(cornelius)\nConvict(cornelius, eduard)\nSphacelate(regina, cornelius)\nSphacelate(regina, eduard)\nPlunge(regina, cornelius)\nSphacelate(eduard, regina)\nCarpellate(eduard)\nCongested(eduard)\nRenewed(eduard)\nSphacelate(cornelius, eduard) -> Sphacelate(cornelius, regina)\nSphacelate(cornelius, eduard) -> Plunge(eduard, cornelius)\nforall x (Convict(x, eduard) -> Dressy(eduard))\nforall x (Congested(x) and Anapaestic(x) -> not Sphacelate(x, cornelius))\nforall x (Dressy(x) -> Anapaestic(x))\nforall x (Anapaestic(x) and not Plunge(x, regina) -> not Convict(x, cornelius))\n\nCarpellate(regina)\n\nCarpellate(regina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The bevvy refrain the luise. The bevvy refrain the umeko. The bevvy is cyclonal. The bevvy is shapeless. The bevvy aquaplane the umeko. The luise exorcize the bevvy. The luise exorcize the umeko. The luise refrain the bevvy. The umeko exorcize the luise. The umeko is cyclonal. The umeko is afloat. The umeko is synovial. If the bevvy exorcize the umeko then the bevvy exorcize the luise. If the bevvy exorcize the umeko then the umeko refrain the bevvy. If something aquaplane the umeko then the umeko is veterinary. If something is afloat and shapeless then it does not chase the bevvy. If something is veterinary then it is shapeless. If something is shapeless and it does not eat the luise then it does not need the bevvy. The umeko does not eat the luise.", "logic": "\nRefrain(bevvy, luise)\nRefrain(bevvy, umeko)\nCyclonal(bevvy)\nShapeless(bevvy)\nAquaplane(bevvy, umeko)\nExorcize(luise, bevvy)\nExorcize(luise, umeko)\nRefrain(luise, bevvy)\nExorcize(umeko, luise)\nCyclonal(umeko)\nAfloat(umeko)\nSynovial(umeko)\nExorcize(bevvy, umeko) -> Exorcize(bevvy, luise)\nExorcize(bevvy, umeko) -> Refrain(umeko, bevvy)\nforall x (Aquaplane(x, umeko) -> Veterinary(umeko))\nforall x (Afloat(x) and Shapeless(x) -> not Exorcize(x, bevvy))\nforall x (Veterinary(x) -> Shapeless(x))\nforall x (Shapeless(x) and not Refrain(x, luise) -> not Aquaplane(x, bevvy))\n\nnot Refrain(umeko, luise)\n\nnot Refrain(umeko, luise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "The rabi drool the clemmy. The rabi drool the petronia. The rabi is sarawakian. The rabi is excrescent. The rabi basset the petronia. The clemmy inspect the rabi. The clemmy inspect the petronia. The clemmy drool the rabi. The petronia inspect the clemmy. The petronia is sarawakian. The petronia is treated. The petronia is maiden. If the rabi inspect the petronia then the rabi inspect the clemmy. If the rabi inspect the petronia then the petronia drool the rabi. If something basset the petronia then the petronia is willowy. If something is treated and excrescent then it does not chase the rabi. If something is willowy then it is excrescent. If something is excrescent and it does not eat the clemmy then it does not need the rabi. The petronia basset the rabi.", "logic": "\nDrool(rabi, clemmy)\nDrool(rabi, petronia)\nSarawakian(rabi)\nExcrescent(rabi)\nBasset(rabi, petronia)\nInspect(clemmy, rabi)\nInspect(clemmy, petronia)\nDrool(clemmy, rabi)\nInspect(petronia, clemmy)\nSarawakian(petronia)\nTreated(petronia)\nMaiden(petronia)\nInspect(rabi, petronia) -> Inspect(rabi, clemmy)\nInspect(rabi, petronia) -> Drool(petronia, rabi)\nforall x (Basset(x, petronia) -> Willowy(petronia))\nforall x (Treated(x) and Excrescent(x) -> not Inspect(x, rabi))\nforall x (Willowy(x) -> Excrescent(x))\nforall x (Excrescent(x) and not Drool(x, clemmy) -> not Basset(x, rabi))\n\nBasset(petronia, rabi)\n\nBasset(petronia, rabi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-983"} {"premises": "Andonis is stirring. Andonis is stalkless. Andonis is endowed. Andonis is legato. Clayborn is dumbstruck. Clayborn is endowed. Clayborn is legato. Smart people are ductless. Cold, stalkless people are legato. Young, dumbstruck people are stalkless. Kind, stirring people are ductless. If Andonis is penile and Andonis is ductless then Andonis is dumbstruck. All stirring, stalkless people are penile. Andonis is stirring.", "logic": "\nStirring(andonis)\nStalkless(andonis)\nEndowed(andonis)\nLegato(andonis)\nDumbstruck(clayborn)\nEndowed(clayborn)\nLegato(clayborn)\nforall x (Penile(x) -> Ductless(x))\nforall x (Stirring(x) and Stalkless(x) -> Legato(x))\nforall x (Legato(x) and Dumbstruck(x) -> Stalkless(x))\nforall x (Dumbstruck(x) and Stirring(x) -> Ductless(x))\nPenile(andonis) and Ductless(andonis) -> Dumbstruck(andonis)\nforall x (Stirring(x) and Stalkless(x) -> Penile(x))\n\nStirring(andonis)\n\ntherefore Stirring(andonis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Basia is super. Basia is ascetical. Basia is gabby. Basia is embolic. Becka is semite. Becka is gabby. Becka is embolic. Smart people are lowest. Cold, ascetical people are embolic. Young, semite people are ascetical. Kind, super people are lowest. If Basia is autogenous and Basia is lowest then Basia is semite. All super, ascetical people are autogenous. Basia is not embolic.", "logic": "\nSuper(basia)\nAscetical(basia)\nGabby(basia)\nEmbolic(basia)\nSemite(becka)\nGabby(becka)\nEmbolic(becka)\nforall x (Autogenous(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Super(x) and Ascetical(x) -> Embolic(x))\nforall x (Embolic(x) and Semite(x) -> Ascetical(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) and Super(x) -> Lowest(x))\nAutogenous(basia) and Lowest(basia) -> Semite(basia)\nforall x (Super(x) and Ascetical(x) -> Autogenous(x))\n\nnot Embolic(basia)\n\ntherefore Embolic(basia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Ava is oxidizable. Ava is incitive. Ava is lxxiv. Ava is biovular. Raymond is undulatory. Raymond is lxxiv. Raymond is biovular. Smart people are fiducial. Cold, incitive people are biovular. Young, undulatory people are incitive. Kind, oxidizable people are fiducial. If Ava is billed and Ava is fiducial then Ava is undulatory. All oxidizable, incitive people are billed. Ava is billed.", "logic": "\nOxidizable(ava)\nIncitive(ava)\nLxxiv(ava)\nBiovular(ava)\nUndulatory(raymond)\nLxxiv(raymond)\nBiovular(raymond)\nforall x (Billed(x) -> Fiducial(x))\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) and Incitive(x) -> Biovular(x))\nforall x (Biovular(x) and Undulatory(x) -> Incitive(x))\nforall x (Undulatory(x) and Oxidizable(x) -> Fiducial(x))\nBilled(ava) and Fiducial(ava) -> Undulatory(ava)\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) and Incitive(x) -> Billed(x))\n\nBilled(ava)\n\nOxidizable(ava) and Incitive(ava) and forall x (Oxidizable(x) and Incitive(x) -> Billed(x)) -> therefore Billed(ava)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Julianne is bestial. Julianne is resinated. Julianne is timed. Julianne is apocryphal. Georgie is aphyllous. Georgie is timed. Georgie is apocryphal. Smart people are serpentine. Cold, resinated people are apocryphal. Young, aphyllous people are resinated. Kind, bestial people are serpentine. If Julianne is decreased and Julianne is serpentine then Julianne is aphyllous. All bestial, resinated people are decreased. Georgie is not resinated.", "logic": "\nBestial(julianne)\nResinated(julianne)\nTimed(julianne)\nApocryphal(julianne)\nAphyllous(georgie)\nTimed(georgie)\nApocryphal(georgie)\nforall x (Decreased(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) and Resinated(x) -> Apocryphal(x))\nforall x (Apocryphal(x) and Aphyllous(x) -> Resinated(x))\nforall x (Aphyllous(x) and Bestial(x) -> Serpentine(x))\nDecreased(julianne) and Serpentine(julianne) -> Aphyllous(julianne)\nforall x (Bestial(x) and Resinated(x) -> Decreased(x))\n\nnot Resinated(georgie)\n\nApocryphal(georgie) and Aphyllous(georgie) and forall x (Apocryphal(x) and Aphyllous(x) -> Resinated(x)) -> therefore Resinated(georgie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Charissa is brumal. Charissa is carpal. Charissa is rumanian. Charissa is delusional. Katharine is pronominal. Katharine is rumanian. Katharine is delusional. Smart people are mirky. Cold, carpal people are delusional. Young, pronominal people are carpal. Kind, brumal people are mirky. If Charissa is evacuant and Charissa is mirky then Charissa is pronominal. All brumal, carpal people are evacuant. Charissa is mirky.", "logic": "\nBrumal(charissa)\nCarpal(charissa)\nRumanian(charissa)\nDelusional(charissa)\nPronominal(katharine)\nRumanian(katharine)\nDelusional(katharine)\nforall x (Evacuant(x) -> Mirky(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) and Carpal(x) -> Delusional(x))\nforall x (Delusional(x) and Pronominal(x) -> Carpal(x))\nforall x (Pronominal(x) and Brumal(x) -> Mirky(x))\nEvacuant(charissa) and Mirky(charissa) -> Pronominal(charissa)\nforall x (Brumal(x) and Carpal(x) -> Evacuant(x))\n\nMirky(charissa)\n\nBrumal(charissa) and Carpal(charissa) and forall x (Brumal(x) and Carpal(x) -> Evacuant(x)) -> therefore Evacuant(charissa) Evacuant(charissa) and forall x (Evacuant(x) -> Mirky(x)) -> therefore Mirky(charissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Hertha is saute. Hertha is flooded. Hertha is adpressed. Hertha is autotomic. Reece is blackish. Reece is adpressed. Reece is autotomic. Smart people are fouled. Cold, flooded people are autotomic. Young, blackish people are flooded. Kind, saute people are fouled. If Hertha is lighted and Hertha is fouled then Hertha is blackish. All saute, flooded people are lighted. Hertha is not fouled.", "logic": "\nSaute(hertha)\nFlooded(hertha)\nAdpressed(hertha)\nAutotomic(hertha)\nBlackish(reece)\nAdpressed(reece)\nAutotomic(reece)\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Fouled(x))\nforall x (Saute(x) and Flooded(x) -> Autotomic(x))\nforall x (Autotomic(x) and Blackish(x) -> Flooded(x))\nforall x (Blackish(x) and Saute(x) -> Fouled(x))\nLighted(hertha) and Fouled(hertha) -> Blackish(hertha)\nforall x (Saute(x) and Flooded(x) -> Lighted(x))\n\nnot Fouled(hertha)\n\nSaute(hertha) and Flooded(hertha) and forall x (Saute(x) and Flooded(x) -> Lighted(x)) -> therefore Lighted(hertha) Lighted(hertha) and forall x (Lighted(x) -> Fouled(x)) -> therefore Fouled(hertha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Jennine is calm. Jennine is sunlit. Jennine is epilithic. Jennine is captive. Julianna is eolotropic. Julianna is epilithic. Julianna is captive. Smart people are unflavored. Cold, sunlit people are captive. Young, eolotropic people are sunlit. Kind, calm people are unflavored. If Jennine is legged and Jennine is unflavored then Jennine is eolotropic. All calm, sunlit people are legged. Jennine is eolotropic.", "logic": "\nCalm(jennine)\nSunlit(jennine)\nEpilithic(jennine)\nCaptive(jennine)\nEolotropic(julianna)\nEpilithic(julianna)\nCaptive(julianna)\nforall x (Legged(x) -> Unflavored(x))\nforall x (Calm(x) and Sunlit(x) -> Captive(x))\nforall x (Captive(x) and Eolotropic(x) -> Sunlit(x))\nforall x (Eolotropic(x) and Calm(x) -> Unflavored(x))\nLegged(jennine) and Unflavored(jennine) -> Eolotropic(jennine)\nforall x (Calm(x) and Sunlit(x) -> Legged(x))\n\nEolotropic(jennine)\n\nCalm(jennine) and Sunlit(jennine) and forall x (Calm(x) and Sunlit(x) -> Legged(x)) -> therefore Legged(jennine) Calm(jennine) and Sunlit(jennine) and forall x (Calm(x) and Sunlit(x) -> Legged(x)) -> therefore Legged(jennine) Legged(jennine) and forall x (Legged(x) -> Unflavored(x)) -> therefore Unflavored(jennine) Legged(jennine) and Unflavored(jennine) and Legged(jennine) and Unflavored(jennine) -> Eolotropic(jennine) -> therefore Eolotropic(jennine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Ceil is taxonomic. Ceil is unforced. Ceil is paranoid. Ceil is probatory. Glory is hundredth. Glory is paranoid. Glory is probatory. Smart people are lateen. Cold, unforced people are probatory. Young, hundredth people are unforced. Kind, taxonomic people are lateen. If Ceil is endogamous and Ceil is lateen then Ceil is hundredth. All taxonomic, unforced people are endogamous. Ceil is not hundredth.", "logic": "\nTaxonomic(ceil)\nUnforced(ceil)\nParanoid(ceil)\nProbatory(ceil)\nHundredth(glory)\nParanoid(glory)\nProbatory(glory)\nforall x (Endogamous(x) -> Lateen(x))\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) and Unforced(x) -> Probatory(x))\nforall x (Probatory(x) and Hundredth(x) -> Unforced(x))\nforall x (Hundredth(x) and Taxonomic(x) -> Lateen(x))\nEndogamous(ceil) and Lateen(ceil) -> Hundredth(ceil)\nforall x (Taxonomic(x) and Unforced(x) -> Endogamous(x))\n\nnot Hundredth(ceil)\n\nTaxonomic(ceil) and Unforced(ceil) and forall x (Taxonomic(x) and Unforced(x) -> Endogamous(x)) -> therefore Endogamous(ceil) Taxonomic(ceil) and Unforced(ceil) and forall x (Taxonomic(x) and Unforced(x) -> Endogamous(x)) -> therefore Endogamous(ceil) Endogamous(ceil) and forall x (Endogamous(x) -> Lateen(x)) -> therefore Lateen(ceil) Endogamous(ceil) and Lateen(ceil) and Endogamous(ceil) and Lateen(ceil) -> Hundredth(ceil) -> therefore Hundredth(ceil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Shannan is sequential. Shannan is overhasty. Shannan is licentious. Shannan is savorless. Zary is bettering. Zary is licentious. Zary is savorless. Smart people are clayey. Cold, overhasty people are savorless. Young, bettering people are overhasty. Kind, sequential people are clayey. If Shannan is milky and Shannan is clayey then Shannan is bettering. All sequential, overhasty people are milky. Zary is not milky.", "logic": "\nSequential(shannan)\nOverhasty(shannan)\nLicentious(shannan)\nSavorless(shannan)\nBettering(zary)\nLicentious(zary)\nSavorless(zary)\nforall x (Milky(x) -> Clayey(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Savorless(x))\nforall x (Savorless(x) and Bettering(x) -> Overhasty(x))\nforall x (Bettering(x) and Sequential(x) -> Clayey(x))\nMilky(shannan) and Clayey(shannan) -> Bettering(shannan)\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Milky(x))\n\nnot Milky(zary)\n\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Milky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Diannne is rising. Diannne is unwary. Diannne is perfected. Diannne is bacchic. Barnaby is cognisable. Barnaby is perfected. Barnaby is bacchic. Smart people are infrared. Cold, unwary people are bacchic. Young, cognisable people are unwary. Kind, rising people are infrared. If Diannne is strangled and Diannne is infrared then Diannne is cognisable. All rising, unwary people are strangled. Barnaby is infrared.", "logic": "\nRising(diannne)\nUnwary(diannne)\nPerfected(diannne)\nBacchic(diannne)\nCognisable(barnaby)\nPerfected(barnaby)\nBacchic(barnaby)\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> Infrared(x))\nforall x (Rising(x) and Unwary(x) -> Bacchic(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Cognisable(x) -> Unwary(x))\nforall x (Cognisable(x) and Rising(x) -> Infrared(x))\nStrangled(diannne) and Infrared(diannne) -> Cognisable(diannne)\nforall x (Rising(x) and Unwary(x) -> Strangled(x))\n\nInfrared(barnaby)\n\nforall x (Strangled(x) -> Infrared(x)) <- forall x (Rising(x) and Unwary(x) -> Strangled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1524"} {"premises": "Alfonso is costate. All master people are afoul. If someone is masted and not costate then they are not acrogenic. If someone is acrogenic and costate then they are not aortal. Alfonso is costate.", "logic": "\nCostate(alfonso)\nforall x (Master(x) -> Afoul(x))\nforall x (Masted(x) and not Costate(x) -> not Acrogenic(x))\nforall x (Acrogenic(x) and Costate(x) -> not Aortal(x))\n\nCostate(alfonso)\n\ntherefore Costate(alfonso)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-299"} {"premises": "Frances is sloping. All foliaceous people are supporting. If someone is narcotized and not sloping then they are not chirpy. If someone is chirpy and sloping then they are not dissuasive. Frances is not sloping.", "logic": "\nSloping(frances)\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) -> Supporting(x))\nforall x (Narcotized(x) and not Sloping(x) -> not Chirpy(x))\nforall x (Chirpy(x) and Sloping(x) -> not Dissuasive(x))\n\nnot Sloping(frances)\n\ntherefore Sloping(frances)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-299"} {"premises": "Shimon is cuplike. All modular people are jesting. If someone is unloving and not cuplike then they are not pictorial. If someone is pictorial and cuplike then they are not guileful. Shimon is not jesting.", "logic": "\nCuplike(shimon)\nforall x (Modular(x) -> Jesting(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) and not Cuplike(x) -> not Pictorial(x))\nforall x (Pictorial(x) and Cuplike(x) -> not Guileful(x))\n\nnot Jesting(shimon)\n\nforall x (Modular(x) -> Jesting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-299"} {"premises": "Gamaliel is opthalmic. All unarmored people are endermatic. If someone is lunar and not opthalmic then they are not gabled. If someone is gabled and opthalmic then they are not dirty. Gamaliel is dirty.", "logic": "\nOpthalmic(gamaliel)\nforall x (Unarmored(x) -> Endermatic(x))\nforall x (Lunar(x) and not Opthalmic(x) -> not Gabled(x))\nforall x (Gabled(x) and Opthalmic(x) -> not Dirty(x))\n\nDirty(gamaliel)\n\nDirty(gamaliel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-299"} {"premises": "Fairfax is not slowgoing. Fairfax is not virulent. Fairfax is camp. Fairfax is not thwartwise. Lisbeth is slowgoing. Lisbeth is not mordacious. Lisbeth is virulent. Big, thwartwise things are camp. Big things are camp. If something is admissive then it is thwartwise. If something is absorptive and mordacious then it is admissive. Green, absorptive things are admissive. If something is absorptive and not virulent then it is mordacious. All virulent things are absorptive. Quiet things are absorptive. Lisbeth is virulent.", "logic": "\nnot Slowgoing(fairfax)\nnot Virulent(fairfax)\nCamp(fairfax)\nnot Thwartwise(fairfax)\nSlowgoing(lisbeth)\nnot Mordacious(lisbeth)\nVirulent(lisbeth)\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) and Thwartwise(x) -> Camp(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Camp(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) and Mordacious(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Virulent(x) and Absorptive(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Absorptive(x) and not Virulent(x) -> Mordacious(x))\nforall x (Virulent(x) -> Absorptive(x))\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Absorptive(x))\n\nVirulent(lisbeth)\n\ntherefore Virulent(lisbeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Mada is not distant. Mada is not unfunny. Mada is hypotonic. Mada is not ulcerated. Pennie is distant. Pennie is not benzoic. Pennie is unfunny. Big, ulcerated things are hypotonic. Big things are hypotonic. If something is derelict then it is ulcerated. If something is cryptic and benzoic then it is derelict. Green, cryptic things are derelict. If something is cryptic and not unfunny then it is benzoic. All unfunny things are cryptic. Quiet things are cryptic. Mada is distant.", "logic": "\nnot Distant(mada)\nnot Unfunny(mada)\nHypotonic(mada)\nnot Ulcerated(mada)\nDistant(pennie)\nnot Benzoic(pennie)\nUnfunny(pennie)\nforall x (Distant(x) and Ulcerated(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Distant(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Derelict(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and Benzoic(x) -> Derelict(x))\nforall x (Unfunny(x) and Cryptic(x) -> Derelict(x))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and not Unfunny(x) -> Benzoic(x))\nforall x (Unfunny(x) -> Cryptic(x))\nforall x (Derelict(x) -> Cryptic(x))\n\nDistant(mada)\n\ntherefore not Distant(mada)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Ned is not jumbled. Ned is not assignable. Ned is parched. Ned is not bucolic. Archie is jumbled. Archie is not lanceolate. Archie is assignable. Big, bucolic things are parched. Big things are parched. If something is hairless then it is bucolic. If something is aspherical and lanceolate then it is hairless. Green, aspherical things are hairless. If something is aspherical and not assignable then it is lanceolate. All assignable things are aspherical. Quiet things are aspherical. Archie is parched.", "logic": "\nnot Jumbled(ned)\nnot Assignable(ned)\nParched(ned)\nnot Bucolic(ned)\nJumbled(archie)\nnot Lanceolate(archie)\nAssignable(archie)\nforall x (Jumbled(x) and Bucolic(x) -> Parched(x))\nforall x (Jumbled(x) -> Parched(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) -> Bucolic(x))\nforall x (Aspherical(x) and Lanceolate(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Assignable(x) and Aspherical(x) -> Hairless(x))\nforall x (Aspherical(x) and not Assignable(x) -> Lanceolate(x))\nforall x (Assignable(x) -> Aspherical(x))\nforall x (Hairless(x) -> Aspherical(x))\n\nParched(archie)\n\nJumbled(archie) and forall x (Jumbled(x) -> Parched(x)) -> therefore Parched(archie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Moore is not thyroid. Moore is not mullioned. Moore is aberrant. Moore is not annoyed. Cortese is thyroid. Cortese is not obsolete. Cortese is mullioned. Big, annoyed things are aberrant. Big things are aberrant. If something is gleeful then it is annoyed. If something is sanitary and obsolete then it is gleeful. Green, sanitary things are gleeful. If something is sanitary and not mullioned then it is obsolete. All mullioned things are sanitary. Quiet things are sanitary. Cortese is not sanitary.", "logic": "\nnot Thyroid(moore)\nnot Mullioned(moore)\nAberrant(moore)\nnot Annoyed(moore)\nThyroid(cortese)\nnot Obsolete(cortese)\nMullioned(cortese)\nforall x (Thyroid(x) and Annoyed(x) -> Aberrant(x))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Aberrant(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Sanitary(x) and Obsolete(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Mullioned(x) and Sanitary(x) -> Gleeful(x))\nforall x (Sanitary(x) and not Mullioned(x) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Mullioned(x) -> Sanitary(x))\nforall x (Gleeful(x) -> Sanitary(x))\n\nnot Sanitary(cortese)\n\nMullioned(cortese) and forall x (Mullioned(x) -> Sanitary(x)) -> therefore Sanitary(cortese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Morty is not collarless. Morty is not burning. Morty is lengthened. Morty is not cheating. Ardenia is collarless. Ardenia is not citywide. Ardenia is burning. Big, cheating things are lengthened. Big things are lengthened. If something is tenor then it is cheating. If something is hebdomadal and citywide then it is tenor. Green, hebdomadal things are tenor. If something is hebdomadal and not burning then it is citywide. All burning things are hebdomadal. Quiet things are hebdomadal. Ardenia is tenor.", "logic": "\nnot Collarless(morty)\nnot Burning(morty)\nLengthened(morty)\nnot Cheating(morty)\nCollarless(ardenia)\nnot Citywide(ardenia)\nBurning(ardenia)\nforall x (Collarless(x) and Cheating(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nforall x (Collarless(x) -> Lengthened(x))\nforall x (Tenor(x) -> Cheating(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and Citywide(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Burning(x) and Hebdomadal(x) -> Tenor(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) and not Burning(x) -> Citywide(x))\nforall x (Burning(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\nforall x (Tenor(x) -> Hebdomadal(x))\n\nTenor(ardenia)\n\nBurning(ardenia) and forall x (Burning(x) -> Hebdomadal(x)) -> therefore Hebdomadal(ardenia) Burning(ardenia) and Hebdomadal(ardenia) and forall x (Burning(x) and Hebdomadal(x) -> Tenor(x)) -> therefore Tenor(ardenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Ramsay is not grievous. Ramsay is not geothermic. Ramsay is uninspired. Ramsay is not stalwart. Clair is grievous. Clair is not corbelled. Clair is geothermic. Big, stalwart things are uninspired. Big things are uninspired. If something is carotid then it is stalwart. If something is vapourous and corbelled then it is carotid. Green, vapourous things are carotid. If something is vapourous and not geothermic then it is corbelled. All geothermic things are vapourous. Quiet things are vapourous. Clair is not carotid.", "logic": "\nnot Grievous(ramsay)\nnot Geothermic(ramsay)\nUninspired(ramsay)\nnot Stalwart(ramsay)\nGrievous(clair)\nnot Corbelled(clair)\nGeothermic(clair)\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Stalwart(x) -> Uninspired(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) -> Uninspired(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> Stalwart(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and Corbelled(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and not Geothermic(x) -> Corbelled(x))\nforall x (Geothermic(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Carotid(x) -> Vapourous(x))\n\nnot Carotid(clair)\n\nGeothermic(clair) and forall x (Geothermic(x) -> Vapourous(x)) -> therefore Vapourous(clair) Geothermic(clair) and Vapourous(clair) and forall x (Geothermic(x) and Vapourous(x) -> Carotid(x)) -> therefore Carotid(clair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Juliette is not achromatic. Juliette is not exposed. Juliette is bountied. Juliette is not aspheric. Renelle is achromatic. Renelle is not passionate. Renelle is exposed. Big, aspheric things are bountied. Big things are bountied. If something is socratic then it is aspheric. If something is occlusive and passionate then it is socratic. Green, occlusive things are socratic. If something is occlusive and not exposed then it is passionate. All exposed things are occlusive. Quiet things are occlusive. Renelle is aspheric.", "logic": "\nnot Achromatic(juliette)\nnot Exposed(juliette)\nBountied(juliette)\nnot Aspheric(juliette)\nAchromatic(renelle)\nnot Passionate(renelle)\nExposed(renelle)\nforall x (Achromatic(x) and Aspheric(x) -> Bountied(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Bountied(x))\nforall x (Socratic(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Passionate(x) -> Socratic(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) and Occlusive(x) -> Socratic(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and not Exposed(x) -> Passionate(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> Occlusive(x))\nforall x (Socratic(x) -> Occlusive(x))\n\nAspheric(renelle)\n\nExposed(renelle) and forall x (Exposed(x) -> Occlusive(x)) -> therefore Occlusive(renelle) Exposed(renelle) and Occlusive(renelle) and forall x (Exposed(x) and Occlusive(x) -> Socratic(x)) -> therefore Socratic(renelle) Socratic(renelle) and forall x (Socratic(x) -> Aspheric(x)) -> therefore Aspheric(renelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Davie is not shitty. Davie is not estranging. Davie is apocrine. Davie is not expanded. Tomasine is shitty. Tomasine is not meaty. Tomasine is estranging. Big, expanded things are apocrine. Big things are apocrine. If something is flaccid then it is expanded. If something is shorthand and meaty then it is flaccid. Green, shorthand things are flaccid. If something is shorthand and not estranging then it is meaty. All estranging things are shorthand. Quiet things are shorthand. Tomasine is not expanded.", "logic": "\nnot Shitty(davie)\nnot Estranging(davie)\nApocrine(davie)\nnot Expanded(davie)\nShitty(tomasine)\nnot Meaty(tomasine)\nEstranging(tomasine)\nforall x (Shitty(x) and Expanded(x) -> Apocrine(x))\nforall x (Shitty(x) -> Apocrine(x))\nforall x (Flaccid(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Meaty(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Estranging(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Flaccid(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and not Estranging(x) -> Meaty(x))\nforall x (Estranging(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Flaccid(x) -> Shorthand(x))\n\nnot Expanded(tomasine)\n\nEstranging(tomasine) and forall x (Estranging(x) -> Shorthand(x)) -> therefore Shorthand(tomasine) Estranging(tomasine) and Shorthand(tomasine) and forall x (Estranging(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Flaccid(x)) -> therefore Flaccid(tomasine) Flaccid(tomasine) and forall x (Flaccid(x) -> Expanded(x)) -> therefore Expanded(tomasine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Hyacinth is not quits. Hyacinth is not pestilent. Hyacinth is forty. Hyacinth is not flavorless. Amalia is quits. Amalia is not ungroomed. Amalia is pestilent. Big, flavorless things are forty. Big things are forty. If something is comestible then it is flavorless. If something is snarly and ungroomed then it is comestible. Green, snarly things are comestible. If something is snarly and not pestilent then it is ungroomed. All pestilent things are snarly. Quiet things are snarly. Hyacinth is not ungroomed.", "logic": "\nnot Quits(hyacinth)\nnot Pestilent(hyacinth)\nForty(hyacinth)\nnot Flavorless(hyacinth)\nQuits(amalia)\nnot Ungroomed(amalia)\nPestilent(amalia)\nforall x (Quits(x) and Flavorless(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Quits(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Flavorless(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) and Ungroomed(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Pestilent(x) and Snarly(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Snarly(x) and not Pestilent(x) -> Ungroomed(x))\nforall x (Pestilent(x) -> Snarly(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) -> Snarly(x))\n\nnot Ungroomed(hyacinth)\n\nforall x (Snarly(x) and not Pestilent(x) -> Ungroomed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "Husein is not lamentable. Husein is not handless. Husein is sporty. Husein is not tinned. Iggy is lamentable. Iggy is not popeyed. Iggy is handless. Big, tinned things are sporty. Big things are sporty. If something is clitoral then it is tinned. If something is mesenteric and popeyed then it is clitoral. Green, mesenteric things are clitoral. If something is mesenteric and not handless then it is popeyed. All handless things are mesenteric. Quiet things are mesenteric. Husein is clitoral.", "logic": "\nnot Lamentable(husein)\nnot Handless(husein)\nSporty(husein)\nnot Tinned(husein)\nLamentable(iggy)\nnot Popeyed(iggy)\nHandless(iggy)\nforall x (Lamentable(x) and Tinned(x) -> Sporty(x))\nforall x (Lamentable(x) -> Sporty(x))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) -> Tinned(x))\nforall x (Mesenteric(x) and Popeyed(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Handless(x) and Mesenteric(x) -> Clitoral(x))\nforall x (Mesenteric(x) and not Handless(x) -> Popeyed(x))\nforall x (Handless(x) -> Mesenteric(x))\nforall x (Clitoral(x) -> Mesenteric(x))\n\nClitoral(husein)\n\nforall x (Mesenteric(x) and Popeyed(x) -> Clitoral(x)) <- forall x (Mesenteric(x) and not Handless(x) -> Popeyed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The elsey ritualize the burke. The angelique loll the elsey. The renell loll the angelique. The burke is hipless. If the elsey loll the renell and the renell is hipless then the renell polychrome the burke. If someone is hipless then they see the renell. If someone loll the renell and they eat the burke then they see the elsey. If the angelique polychrome the renell and the angelique is irritative then the renell loll the angelique. If someone polychrome the elsey and they are hipless then the elsey polychrome the renell. Blue people are hipless. If someone loll the elsey then the elsey is mesmerized. If someone loll the burke and they eat the elsey then they are mesmerized. The burke is hipless.", "logic": "\nRitualize(elsey, burke)\nLoll(angelique, elsey)\nLoll(renell, angelique)\nHipless(burke)\nLoll(elsey, renell) and Hipless(renell) -> Polychrome(renell, burke)\nforall x (Hipless(x) -> Polychrome(x, renell))\nforall x (Loll(x, renell) and Loll(x, burke) -> Polychrome(x, elsey))\nPolychrome(angelique, renell) and Irritative(angelique) -> Loll(renell, angelique)\nforall x (Polychrome(x, elsey) and Hipless(x) -> Polychrome(elsey, renell))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) -> Hipless(x))\nforall x (Loll(x, elsey) -> Mesmerized(elsey))\nforall x (Loll(x, burke) and Loll(x, elsey) -> Mesmerized(x))\n\nHipless(burke)\n\ntherefore Hipless(burke)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The eleonore seem the mitra. The rog book the eleonore. The frans book the rog. The mitra is unstudious. If the eleonore book the frans and the frans is unstudious then the frans careen the mitra. If someone is unstudious then they see the frans. If someone book the frans and they eat the mitra then they see the eleonore. If the rog careen the frans and the rog is invariable then the frans book the rog. If someone careen the eleonore and they are unstudious then the eleonore careen the frans. Blue people are unstudious. If someone book the eleonore then the eleonore is passerine. If someone book the mitra and they eat the eleonore then they are passerine. The mitra is not unstudious.", "logic": "\nSeem(eleonore, mitra)\nBook(rog, eleonore)\nBook(frans, rog)\nUnstudious(mitra)\nBook(eleonore, frans) and Unstudious(frans) -> Careen(frans, mitra)\nforall x (Unstudious(x) -> Careen(x, frans))\nforall x (Book(x, frans) and Book(x, mitra) -> Careen(x, eleonore))\nCareen(rog, frans) and Invariable(rog) -> Book(frans, rog)\nforall x (Careen(x, eleonore) and Unstudious(x) -> Careen(eleonore, frans))\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Unstudious(x))\nforall x (Book(x, eleonore) -> Passerine(eleonore))\nforall x (Book(x, mitra) and Book(x, eleonore) -> Passerine(x))\n\nnot Unstudious(mitra)\n\ntherefore Unstudious(mitra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The franni straiten the lolly. The cam interview the franni. The fey interview the cam. The lolly is proper. If the franni interview the fey and the fey is proper then the fey romanise the lolly. If someone is proper then they see the fey. If someone interview the fey and they eat the lolly then they see the franni. If the cam romanise the fey and the cam is porous then the fey interview the cam. If someone romanise the franni and they are proper then the franni romanise the fey. Blue people are proper. If someone interview the franni then the franni is measly. If someone interview the lolly and they eat the franni then they are measly. The lolly romanise the fey.", "logic": "\nStraiten(franni, lolly)\nInterview(cam, franni)\nInterview(fey, cam)\nProper(lolly)\nInterview(franni, fey) and Proper(fey) -> Romanise(fey, lolly)\nforall x (Proper(x) -> Romanise(x, fey))\nforall x (Interview(x, fey) and Interview(x, lolly) -> Romanise(x, franni))\nRomanise(cam, fey) and Porous(cam) -> Interview(fey, cam)\nforall x (Romanise(x, franni) and Proper(x) -> Romanise(franni, fey))\nforall x (Measly(x) -> Proper(x))\nforall x (Interview(x, franni) -> Measly(franni))\nforall x (Interview(x, lolly) and Interview(x, franni) -> Measly(x))\n\nRomanise(lolly, fey)\n\nProper(lolly) and forall x (Proper(x) -> Romanise(x, fey)) -> therefore Romanise(lolly, fey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The christan mussitate the margarete. The colleen tenderise the christan. The forrest tenderise the colleen. The margarete is coeliac. If the christan tenderise the forrest and the forrest is coeliac then the forrest confer the margarete. If someone is coeliac then they see the forrest. If someone tenderise the forrest and they eat the margarete then they see the christan. If the colleen confer the forrest and the colleen is fortemente then the forrest tenderise the colleen. If someone confer the christan and they are coeliac then the christan confer the forrest. Blue people are coeliac. If someone tenderise the christan then the christan is faltering. If someone tenderise the margarete and they eat the christan then they are faltering. The margarete does not see the forrest.", "logic": "\nMussitate(christan, margarete)\nTenderise(colleen, christan)\nTenderise(forrest, colleen)\nCoeliac(margarete)\nTenderise(christan, forrest) and Coeliac(forrest) -> Confer(forrest, margarete)\nforall x (Coeliac(x) -> Confer(x, forrest))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, forrest) and Tenderise(x, margarete) -> Confer(x, christan))\nConfer(colleen, forrest) and Fortemente(colleen) -> Tenderise(forrest, colleen)\nforall x (Confer(x, christan) and Coeliac(x) -> Confer(christan, forrest))\nforall x (Faltering(x) -> Coeliac(x))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, christan) -> Faltering(christan))\nforall x (Tenderise(x, margarete) and Tenderise(x, christan) -> Faltering(x))\n\nnot Confer(margarete, forrest)\n\nCoeliac(margarete) and forall x (Coeliac(x) -> Confer(x, forrest)) -> therefore Confer(margarete, forrest)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The ardath aver the nanni. The merrily sublimate the ardath. The marius sublimate the merrily. The nanni is finnish. If the ardath sublimate the marius and the marius is finnish then the marius schlep the nanni. If someone is finnish then they see the marius. If someone sublimate the marius and they eat the nanni then they see the ardath. If the merrily schlep the marius and the merrily is unaffected then the marius sublimate the merrily. If someone schlep the ardath and they are finnish then the ardath schlep the marius. Blue people are finnish. If someone sublimate the ardath then the ardath is neotenic. If someone sublimate the nanni and they eat the ardath then they are neotenic. The ardath is finnish.", "logic": "\nAver(ardath, nanni)\nSublimate(merrily, ardath)\nSublimate(marius, merrily)\nFinnish(nanni)\nSublimate(ardath, marius) and Finnish(marius) -> Schlep(marius, nanni)\nforall x (Finnish(x) -> Schlep(x, marius))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, marius) and Sublimate(x, nanni) -> Schlep(x, ardath))\nSchlep(merrily, marius) and Unaffected(merrily) -> Sublimate(marius, merrily)\nforall x (Schlep(x, ardath) and Finnish(x) -> Schlep(ardath, marius))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Finnish(x))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, ardath) -> Neotenic(ardath))\nforall x (Sublimate(x, nanni) and Sublimate(x, ardath) -> Neotenic(x))\n\nFinnish(ardath)\n\nSublimate(merrily, ardath) and forall x (Sublimate(x, ardath) -> Neotenic(ardath)) -> therefore Neotenic(ardath) Neotenic(ardath) and forall x (Neotenic(x) -> Finnish(x)) -> therefore Finnish(ardath)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The hari fawn the mellissa. The joshua shag the hari. The eileen shag the joshua. The mellissa is infamous. If the hari shag the eileen and the eileen is infamous then the eileen eject the mellissa. If someone is infamous then they see the eileen. If someone shag the eileen and they eat the mellissa then they see the hari. If the joshua eject the eileen and the joshua is willful then the eileen shag the joshua. If someone eject the hari and they are infamous then the hari eject the eileen. Blue people are infamous. If someone shag the hari then the hari is streaked. If someone shag the mellissa and they eat the hari then they are streaked. The hari is not infamous.", "logic": "\nFawn(hari, mellissa)\nShag(joshua, hari)\nShag(eileen, joshua)\nInfamous(mellissa)\nShag(hari, eileen) and Infamous(eileen) -> Eject(eileen, mellissa)\nforall x (Infamous(x) -> Eject(x, eileen))\nforall x (Shag(x, eileen) and Shag(x, mellissa) -> Eject(x, hari))\nEject(joshua, eileen) and Willful(joshua) -> Shag(eileen, joshua)\nforall x (Eject(x, hari) and Infamous(x) -> Eject(hari, eileen))\nforall x (Streaked(x) -> Infamous(x))\nforall x (Shag(x, hari) -> Streaked(hari))\nforall x (Shag(x, mellissa) and Shag(x, hari) -> Streaked(x))\n\nnot Infamous(hari)\n\nShag(joshua, hari) and forall x (Shag(x, hari) -> Streaked(hari)) -> therefore Streaked(hari) Streaked(hari) and forall x (Streaked(x) -> Infamous(x)) -> therefore Infamous(hari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The vonni beshrew the mikel. The amargo sorb the vonni. The sophia sorb the amargo. The mikel is fringy. If the vonni sorb the sophia and the sophia is fringy then the sophia yacht the mikel. If someone is fringy then they see the sophia. If someone sorb the sophia and they eat the mikel then they see the vonni. If the amargo yacht the sophia and the amargo is nebulous then the sophia sorb the amargo. If someone yacht the vonni and they are fringy then the vonni yacht the sophia. Blue people are fringy. If someone sorb the vonni then the vonni is shrubby. If someone sorb the mikel and they eat the vonni then they are shrubby. The vonni yacht the sophia.", "logic": "\nBeshrew(vonni, mikel)\nSorb(amargo, vonni)\nSorb(sophia, amargo)\nFringy(mikel)\nSorb(vonni, sophia) and Fringy(sophia) -> Yacht(sophia, mikel)\nforall x (Fringy(x) -> Yacht(x, sophia))\nforall x (Sorb(x, sophia) and Sorb(x, mikel) -> Yacht(x, vonni))\nYacht(amargo, sophia) and Nebulous(amargo) -> Sorb(sophia, amargo)\nforall x (Yacht(x, vonni) and Fringy(x) -> Yacht(vonni, sophia))\nforall x (Shrubby(x) -> Fringy(x))\nforall x (Sorb(x, vonni) -> Shrubby(vonni))\nforall x (Sorb(x, mikel) and Sorb(x, vonni) -> Shrubby(x))\n\nYacht(vonni, sophia)\n\nSorb(amargo, vonni) and forall x (Sorb(x, vonni) -> Shrubby(vonni)) -> therefore Shrubby(vonni) Shrubby(vonni) and forall x (Shrubby(x) -> Fringy(x)) -> therefore Fringy(vonni) Fringy(vonni) and forall x (Fringy(x) -> Yacht(x, sophia)) -> therefore Yacht(vonni, sophia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The jewel glower the oneida. The lynnett whish the jewel. The tabor whish the lynnett. The oneida is piano. If the jewel whish the tabor and the tabor is piano then the tabor function the oneida. If someone is piano then they see the tabor. If someone whish the tabor and they eat the oneida then they see the jewel. If the lynnett function the tabor and the lynnett is fastened then the tabor whish the lynnett. If someone function the jewel and they are piano then the jewel function the tabor. Blue people are piano. If someone whish the jewel then the jewel is herbal. If someone whish the oneida and they eat the jewel then they are herbal. The jewel does not see the tabor.", "logic": "\nGlower(jewel, oneida)\nWhish(lynnett, jewel)\nWhish(tabor, lynnett)\nPiano(oneida)\nWhish(jewel, tabor) and Piano(tabor) -> Function(tabor, oneida)\nforall x (Piano(x) -> Function(x, tabor))\nforall x (Whish(x, tabor) and Whish(x, oneida) -> Function(x, jewel))\nFunction(lynnett, tabor) and Fastened(lynnett) -> Whish(tabor, lynnett)\nforall x (Function(x, jewel) and Piano(x) -> Function(jewel, tabor))\nforall x (Herbal(x) -> Piano(x))\nforall x (Whish(x, jewel) -> Herbal(jewel))\nforall x (Whish(x, oneida) and Whish(x, jewel) -> Herbal(x))\n\nnot Function(jewel, tabor)\n\nWhish(lynnett, jewel) and forall x (Whish(x, jewel) -> Herbal(jewel)) -> therefore Herbal(jewel) Herbal(jewel) and forall x (Herbal(x) -> Piano(x)) -> therefore Piano(jewel) Piano(jewel) and forall x (Piano(x) -> Function(x, tabor)) -> therefore Function(jewel, tabor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The flori preach the adoree. The happy dwarf the flori. The fifine dwarf the happy. The adoree is endermatic. If the flori dwarf the fifine and the fifine is endermatic then the fifine scandalise the adoree. If someone is endermatic then they see the fifine. If someone dwarf the fifine and they eat the adoree then they see the flori. If the happy scandalise the fifine and the happy is trihydroxy then the fifine dwarf the happy. If someone scandalise the flori and they are endermatic then the flori scandalise the fifine. Blue people are endermatic. If someone dwarf the flori then the flori is prakritic. If someone dwarf the adoree and they eat the flori then they are prakritic. The happy is not prakritic.", "logic": "\nPreach(flori, adoree)\nDwarf(happy, flori)\nDwarf(fifine, happy)\nEndermatic(adoree)\nDwarf(flori, fifine) and Endermatic(fifine) -> Scandalise(fifine, adoree)\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Scandalise(x, fifine))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, fifine) and Dwarf(x, adoree) -> Scandalise(x, flori))\nScandalise(happy, fifine) and Trihydroxy(happy) -> Dwarf(fifine, happy)\nforall x (Scandalise(x, flori) and Endermatic(x) -> Scandalise(flori, fifine))\nforall x (Prakritic(x) -> Endermatic(x))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, flori) -> Prakritic(flori))\nforall x (Dwarf(x, adoree) and Dwarf(x, flori) -> Prakritic(x))\n\nnot Prakritic(happy)\n\nforall x (Dwarf(x, adoree) and Dwarf(x, flori) -> Prakritic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The bambi crochet the chet. The cyrille crank the bambi. The chariot crank the cyrille. The chet is boring. If the bambi crank the chariot and the chariot is boring then the chariot curvet the chet. If someone is boring then they see the chariot. If someone crank the chariot and they eat the chet then they see the bambi. If the cyrille curvet the chariot and the cyrille is choragic then the chariot crank the cyrille. If someone curvet the bambi and they are boring then the bambi curvet the chariot. Blue people are boring. If someone crank the bambi then the bambi is peripheral. If someone crank the chet and they eat the bambi then they are peripheral. The chariot curvet the bambi.", "logic": "\nCrochet(bambi, chet)\nCrank(cyrille, bambi)\nCrank(chariot, cyrille)\nBoring(chet)\nCrank(bambi, chariot) and Boring(chariot) -> Curvet(chariot, chet)\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Curvet(x, chariot))\nforall x (Crank(x, chariot) and Crank(x, chet) -> Curvet(x, bambi))\nCurvet(cyrille, chariot) and Choragic(cyrille) -> Crank(chariot, cyrille)\nforall x (Curvet(x, bambi) and Boring(x) -> Curvet(bambi, chariot))\nforall x (Peripheral(x) -> Boring(x))\nforall x (Crank(x, bambi) -> Peripheral(bambi))\nforall x (Crank(x, chet) and Crank(x, bambi) -> Peripheral(x))\n\nCurvet(chariot, bambi)\n\nforall x (Crank(x, chariot) and Crank(x, chet) -> Curvet(x, bambi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The bessy blow the calypso. The voltaire remould the bessy. The wynton remould the voltaire. The calypso is undyed. If the bessy remould the wynton and the wynton is undyed then the wynton buoy the calypso. If someone is undyed then they see the wynton. If someone remould the wynton and they eat the calypso then they see the bessy. If the voltaire buoy the wynton and the voltaire is aeschylean then the wynton remould the voltaire. If someone buoy the bessy and they are undyed then the bessy buoy the wynton. Blue people are undyed. If someone remould the bessy then the bessy is bivalve. If someone remould the calypso and they eat the bessy then they are bivalve. The calypso does not see the bessy.", "logic": "\nBlow(bessy, calypso)\nRemould(voltaire, bessy)\nRemould(wynton, voltaire)\nUndyed(calypso)\nRemould(bessy, wynton) and Undyed(wynton) -> Buoy(wynton, calypso)\nforall x (Undyed(x) -> Buoy(x, wynton))\nforall x (Remould(x, wynton) and Remould(x, calypso) -> Buoy(x, bessy))\nBuoy(voltaire, wynton) and Aeschylean(voltaire) -> Remould(wynton, voltaire)\nforall x (Buoy(x, bessy) and Undyed(x) -> Buoy(bessy, wynton))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) -> Undyed(x))\nforall x (Remould(x, bessy) -> Bivalve(bessy))\nforall x (Remould(x, calypso) and Remould(x, bessy) -> Bivalve(x))\n\nnot Buoy(calypso, bessy)\n\nforall x (Remould(x, wynton) and Remould(x, calypso) -> Buoy(x, bessy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The hebert epoxy the waleed. The viviyan coquette the hebert. The ephrayim coquette the viviyan. The waleed is altered. If the hebert coquette the ephrayim and the ephrayim is altered then the ephrayim guide the waleed. If someone is altered then they see the ephrayim. If someone coquette the ephrayim and they eat the waleed then they see the hebert. If the viviyan guide the ephrayim and the viviyan is becoming then the ephrayim coquette the viviyan. If someone guide the hebert and they are altered then the hebert guide the ephrayim. Blue people are altered. If someone coquette the hebert then the hebert is twisty. If someone coquette the waleed and they eat the hebert then they are twisty. The ephrayim is altered.", "logic": "\nEpoxy(hebert, waleed)\nCoquette(viviyan, hebert)\nCoquette(ephrayim, viviyan)\nAltered(waleed)\nCoquette(hebert, ephrayim) and Altered(ephrayim) -> Guide(ephrayim, waleed)\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Guide(x, ephrayim))\nforall x (Coquette(x, ephrayim) and Coquette(x, waleed) -> Guide(x, hebert))\nGuide(viviyan, ephrayim) and Becoming(viviyan) -> Coquette(ephrayim, viviyan)\nforall x (Guide(x, hebert) and Altered(x) -> Guide(hebert, ephrayim))\nforall x (Twisty(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Coquette(x, hebert) -> Twisty(hebert))\nforall x (Coquette(x, waleed) and Coquette(x, hebert) -> Twisty(x))\n\nAltered(ephrayim)\n\nforall x (Twisty(x) -> Altered(x)) <- forall x (Coquette(x, waleed) and Coquette(x, hebert) -> Twisty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The timmy pummel the torrin. The will catalyse the timmy. The georgiana catalyse the will. The torrin is fraternal. If the timmy catalyse the georgiana and the georgiana is fraternal then the georgiana cannulate the torrin. If someone is fraternal then they see the georgiana. If someone catalyse the georgiana and they eat the torrin then they see the timmy. If the will cannulate the georgiana and the will is breakaway then the georgiana catalyse the will. If someone cannulate the timmy and they are fraternal then the timmy cannulate the georgiana. Blue people are fraternal. If someone catalyse the timmy then the timmy is archeozoic. If someone catalyse the torrin and they eat the timmy then they are archeozoic. The will is not nice.", "logic": "\nPummel(timmy, torrin)\nCatalyse(will, timmy)\nCatalyse(georgiana, will)\nFraternal(torrin)\nCatalyse(timmy, georgiana) and Fraternal(georgiana) -> Cannulate(georgiana, torrin)\nforall x (Fraternal(x) -> Cannulate(x, georgiana))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, georgiana) and Catalyse(x, torrin) -> Cannulate(x, timmy))\nCannulate(will, georgiana) and Breakaway(will) -> Catalyse(georgiana, will)\nforall x (Cannulate(x, timmy) and Fraternal(x) -> Cannulate(timmy, georgiana))\nforall x (Archeozoic(x) -> Fraternal(x))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, timmy) -> Archeozoic(timmy))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, torrin) and Catalyse(x, timmy) -> Archeozoic(x))\n\nnot Nice(will)\n\nnot Nice(will) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The fina surtax the claudine. The marcie disarm the fina. The klarika disarm the marcie. The claudine is categorial. If the fina disarm the klarika and the klarika is categorial then the klarika uncloak the claudine. If someone is categorial then they see the klarika. If someone disarm the klarika and they eat the claudine then they see the fina. If the marcie uncloak the klarika and the marcie is agonizing then the klarika disarm the marcie. If someone uncloak the fina and they are categorial then the fina uncloak the klarika. Blue people are categorial. If someone disarm the fina then the fina is unanswered. If someone disarm the claudine and they eat the fina then they are unanswered. The marcie uncloak the claudine.", "logic": "\nSurtax(fina, claudine)\nDisarm(marcie, fina)\nDisarm(klarika, marcie)\nCategorial(claudine)\nDisarm(fina, klarika) and Categorial(klarika) -> Uncloak(klarika, claudine)\nforall x (Categorial(x) -> Uncloak(x, klarika))\nforall x (Disarm(x, klarika) and Disarm(x, claudine) -> Uncloak(x, fina))\nUncloak(marcie, klarika) and Agonizing(marcie) -> Disarm(klarika, marcie)\nforall x (Uncloak(x, fina) and Categorial(x) -> Uncloak(fina, klarika))\nforall x (Unanswered(x) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Disarm(x, fina) -> Unanswered(fina))\nforall x (Disarm(x, claudine) and Disarm(x, fina) -> Unanswered(x))\n\nUncloak(marcie, claudine)\n\nUncloak(marcie, claudine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The marv rehearse the dinah. The florance scallop the marv. The lib scallop the florance. The dinah is reeking. If the marv scallop the lib and the lib is reeking then the lib dote the dinah. If someone is reeking then they see the lib. If someone scallop the lib and they eat the dinah then they see the marv. If the florance dote the lib and the florance is ghastly then the lib scallop the florance. If someone dote the marv and they are reeking then the marv dote the lib. Blue people are reeking. If someone scallop the marv then the marv is double. If someone scallop the dinah and they eat the marv then they are double. The dinah is not green.", "logic": "\nRehearse(marv, dinah)\nScallop(florance, marv)\nScallop(lib, florance)\nReeking(dinah)\nScallop(marv, lib) and Reeking(lib) -> Dote(lib, dinah)\nforall x (Reeking(x) -> Dote(x, lib))\nforall x (Scallop(x, lib) and Scallop(x, dinah) -> Dote(x, marv))\nDote(florance, lib) and Ghastly(florance) -> Scallop(lib, florance)\nforall x (Dote(x, marv) and Reeking(x) -> Dote(marv, lib))\nforall x (Double(x) -> Reeking(x))\nforall x (Scallop(x, marv) -> Double(marv))\nforall x (Scallop(x, dinah) and Scallop(x, marv) -> Double(x))\n\nnot Green(dinah)\n\nnot Green(dinah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "The mic welsh the zaria. The robinson gelatinise the mic. The bunnie gelatinise the robinson. The zaria is pesky. If the mic gelatinise the bunnie and the bunnie is pesky then the bunnie caseate the zaria. If someone is pesky then they see the bunnie. If someone gelatinise the bunnie and they eat the zaria then they see the mic. If the robinson caseate the bunnie and the robinson is upbound then the bunnie gelatinise the robinson. If someone caseate the mic and they are pesky then the mic caseate the bunnie. Blue people are pesky. If someone gelatinise the mic then the mic is coexistent. If someone gelatinise the zaria and they eat the mic then they are coexistent. The mic is green.", "logic": "\nWelsh(mic, zaria)\nGelatinise(robinson, mic)\nGelatinise(bunnie, robinson)\nPesky(zaria)\nGelatinise(mic, bunnie) and Pesky(bunnie) -> Caseate(bunnie, zaria)\nforall x (Pesky(x) -> Caseate(x, bunnie))\nforall x (Gelatinise(x, bunnie) and Gelatinise(x, zaria) -> Caseate(x, mic))\nCaseate(robinson, bunnie) and Upbound(robinson) -> Gelatinise(bunnie, robinson)\nforall x (Caseate(x, mic) and Pesky(x) -> Caseate(mic, bunnie))\nforall x (Coexistent(x) -> Pesky(x))\nforall x (Gelatinise(x, mic) -> Coexistent(mic))\nforall x (Gelatinise(x, zaria) and Gelatinise(x, mic) -> Coexistent(x))\n\nGreen(mic)\n\nGreen(mic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-780"} {"premises": "Richardo is submissive. Ivan is roughdried. Nina is granitic. Nina is roughdried. Celinka is underway. Celinka is acyclic. Celinka is granitic. Nice, underway people are acyclic. Nice people are bimonthly. All underway, acyclic people are fabulous. Kind people are granitic. Smart, granitic people are roughdried. All bimonthly people are underway. All acyclic people are submissive. All fabulous people are granitic. Richardo is submissive.", "logic": "\nSubmissive(richardo)\nRoughdried(ivan)\nGranitic(nina)\nRoughdried(nina)\nUnderway(celinka)\nAcyclic(celinka)\nGranitic(celinka)\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and Underway(x) -> Acyclic(x))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) -> Bimonthly(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) and Acyclic(x) -> Fabulous(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Granitic(x))\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) and Granitic(x) -> Roughdried(x))\nforall x (Bimonthly(x) -> Underway(x))\nforall x (Acyclic(x) -> Submissive(x))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) -> Granitic(x))\n\nSubmissive(richardo)\n\ntherefore Submissive(richardo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Dolley is voltarian. Elsinore is hindering. Hermina is smashing. Hermina is hindering. Carmella is rampant. Carmella is tiny. Carmella is smashing. Nice, rampant people are tiny. Nice people are inhumane. All rampant, tiny people are scandent. Kind people are smashing. Smart, smashing people are hindering. All inhumane people are rampant. All tiny people are voltarian. All scandent people are smashing. Dolley is not voltarian.", "logic": "\nVoltarian(dolley)\nHindering(elsinore)\nSmashing(hermina)\nHindering(hermina)\nRampant(carmella)\nTiny(carmella)\nSmashing(carmella)\nforall x (Scandent(x) and Rampant(x) -> Tiny(x))\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Rampant(x) and Tiny(x) -> Scandent(x))\nforall x (Rampant(x) -> Smashing(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Smashing(x) -> Hindering(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Rampant(x))\nforall x (Tiny(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Scandent(x) -> Smashing(x))\n\nnot Voltarian(dolley)\n\ntherefore Voltarian(dolley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Dimitrou is softheaded. Brynn is ponderable. Danell is assessable. Danell is ponderable. Alexander is squawky. Alexander is unweaned. Alexander is assessable. Nice, squawky people are unweaned. Nice people are entranced. All squawky, unweaned people are serene. Kind people are assessable. Smart, assessable people are ponderable. All entranced people are squawky. All unweaned people are softheaded. All serene people are assessable. Alexander is softheaded.", "logic": "\nSoftheaded(dimitrou)\nPonderable(brynn)\nAssessable(danell)\nPonderable(danell)\nSquawky(alexander)\nUnweaned(alexander)\nAssessable(alexander)\nforall x (Serene(x) and Squawky(x) -> Unweaned(x))\nforall x (Serene(x) -> Entranced(x))\nforall x (Squawky(x) and Unweaned(x) -> Serene(x))\nforall x (Squawky(x) -> Assessable(x))\nforall x (Entranced(x) and Assessable(x) -> Ponderable(x))\nforall x (Entranced(x) -> Squawky(x))\nforall x (Unweaned(x) -> Softheaded(x))\nforall x (Serene(x) -> Assessable(x))\n\nSoftheaded(alexander)\n\nUnweaned(alexander) and forall x (Unweaned(x) -> Softheaded(x)) -> therefore Softheaded(alexander)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Theresita is pursuing. Brett is inflowing. Kincaid is qatari. Kincaid is inflowing. Delcina is numberless. Delcina is unthawed. Delcina is qatari. Nice, numberless people are unthawed. Nice people are edible. All numberless, unthawed people are utilized. Kind people are qatari. Smart, qatari people are inflowing. All edible people are numberless. All unthawed people are pursuing. All utilized people are qatari. Delcina is not utilized.", "logic": "\nPursuing(theresita)\nInflowing(brett)\nQatari(kincaid)\nInflowing(kincaid)\nNumberless(delcina)\nUnthawed(delcina)\nQatari(delcina)\nforall x (Utilized(x) and Numberless(x) -> Unthawed(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) -> Edible(x))\nforall x (Numberless(x) and Unthawed(x) -> Utilized(x))\nforall x (Numberless(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) and Qatari(x) -> Inflowing(x))\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Numberless(x))\nforall x (Unthawed(x) -> Pursuing(x))\nforall x (Utilized(x) -> Qatari(x))\n\nnot Utilized(delcina)\n\nNumberless(delcina) and Unthawed(delcina) and forall x (Numberless(x) and Unthawed(x) -> Utilized(x)) -> therefore Utilized(delcina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Trixy is bare. Rivi is repeated. Giffard is recovered. Giffard is repeated. Dorothy is equipped. Dorothy is erudite. Dorothy is recovered. Nice, equipped people are erudite. Nice people are dietary. All equipped, erudite people are treed. Kind people are recovered. Smart, recovered people are repeated. All dietary people are equipped. All erudite people are bare. All treed people are recovered. Dorothy is dietary.", "logic": "\nBare(trixy)\nRepeated(rivi)\nRecovered(giffard)\nRepeated(giffard)\nEquipped(dorothy)\nErudite(dorothy)\nRecovered(dorothy)\nforall x (Treed(x) and Equipped(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> Dietary(x))\nforall x (Equipped(x) and Erudite(x) -> Treed(x))\nforall x (Equipped(x) -> Recovered(x))\nforall x (Dietary(x) and Recovered(x) -> Repeated(x))\nforall x (Dietary(x) -> Equipped(x))\nforall x (Erudite(x) -> Bare(x))\nforall x (Treed(x) -> Recovered(x))\n\nDietary(dorothy)\n\nEquipped(dorothy) and Erudite(dorothy) and forall x (Equipped(x) and Erudite(x) -> Treed(x)) -> therefore Treed(dorothy) Treed(dorothy) and forall x (Treed(x) -> Dietary(x)) -> therefore Dietary(dorothy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Felicle is healing. Von is utilised. Kassi is sauteed. Kassi is utilised. Didi is afflicted. Didi is ungulate. Didi is sauteed. Nice, afflicted people are ungulate. Nice people are pragmatic. All afflicted, ungulate people are piteous. Kind people are sauteed. Smart, sauteed people are utilised. All pragmatic people are afflicted. All ungulate people are healing. All piteous people are sauteed. Didi is not pragmatic.", "logic": "\nHealing(felicle)\nUtilised(von)\nSauteed(kassi)\nUtilised(kassi)\nAfflicted(didi)\nUngulate(didi)\nSauteed(didi)\nforall x (Piteous(x) and Afflicted(x) -> Ungulate(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) -> Pragmatic(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and Ungulate(x) -> Piteous(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Sauteed(x))\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) and Sauteed(x) -> Utilised(x))\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) -> Healing(x))\nforall x (Piteous(x) -> Sauteed(x))\n\nnot Pragmatic(didi)\n\nAfflicted(didi) and Ungulate(didi) and forall x (Afflicted(x) and Ungulate(x) -> Piteous(x)) -> therefore Piteous(didi) Piteous(didi) and forall x (Piteous(x) -> Pragmatic(x)) -> therefore Pragmatic(didi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Libbie is subliminal. Herold is bronze. Lavinia is corrugated. Lavinia is bronze. Ketti is ascendible. Ketti is mural. Ketti is corrugated. Nice, ascendible people are mural. Nice people are multiple. All ascendible, mural people are dilatory. Kind people are corrugated. Smart, corrugated people are bronze. All multiple people are ascendible. All mural people are subliminal. All dilatory people are corrugated. Ketti is bronze.", "logic": "\nSubliminal(libbie)\nBronze(herold)\nCorrugated(lavinia)\nBronze(lavinia)\nAscendible(ketti)\nMural(ketti)\nCorrugated(ketti)\nforall x (Dilatory(x) and Ascendible(x) -> Mural(x))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) -> Multiple(x))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) and Mural(x) -> Dilatory(x))\nforall x (Ascendible(x) -> Corrugated(x))\nforall x (Multiple(x) and Corrugated(x) -> Bronze(x))\nforall x (Multiple(x) -> Ascendible(x))\nforall x (Mural(x) -> Subliminal(x))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) -> Corrugated(x))\n\nBronze(ketti)\n\nAscendible(ketti) and Mural(ketti) and forall x (Ascendible(x) and Mural(x) -> Dilatory(x)) -> therefore Dilatory(ketti) Dilatory(ketti) and forall x (Dilatory(x) -> Multiple(x)) -> therefore Multiple(ketti) Multiple(ketti) and Corrugated(ketti) and forall x (Multiple(x) and Corrugated(x) -> Bronze(x)) -> therefore Bronze(ketti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Genevieve is deductive. Redmond is wearable. Malvina is bicornuous. Malvina is wearable. Meggan is much. Meggan is brusk. Meggan is bicornuous. Nice, much people are brusk. Nice people are humanist. All much, brusk people are spiteful. Kind people are bicornuous. Smart, bicornuous people are wearable. All humanist people are much. All brusk people are deductive. All spiteful people are bicornuous. Meggan is not wearable.", "logic": "\nDeductive(genevieve)\nWearable(redmond)\nBicornuous(malvina)\nWearable(malvina)\nMuch(meggan)\nBrusk(meggan)\nBicornuous(meggan)\nforall x (Spiteful(x) and Much(x) -> Brusk(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) -> Humanist(x))\nforall x (Much(x) and Brusk(x) -> Spiteful(x))\nforall x (Much(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\nforall x (Humanist(x) and Bicornuous(x) -> Wearable(x))\nforall x (Humanist(x) -> Much(x))\nforall x (Brusk(x) -> Deductive(x))\nforall x (Spiteful(x) -> Bicornuous(x))\n\nnot Wearable(meggan)\n\nMuch(meggan) and Brusk(meggan) and forall x (Much(x) and Brusk(x) -> Spiteful(x)) -> therefore Spiteful(meggan) Spiteful(meggan) and forall x (Spiteful(x) -> Humanist(x)) -> therefore Humanist(meggan) Humanist(meggan) and Bicornuous(meggan) and forall x (Humanist(x) and Bicornuous(x) -> Wearable(x)) -> therefore Wearable(meggan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Jordanna is zodiacal. Rozalie is composite. Vachel is plump. Vachel is composite. Sheree is expiable. Sheree is validatory. Sheree is plump. Nice, expiable people are validatory. Nice people are lacking. All expiable, validatory people are bismuthic. Kind people are plump. Smart, plump people are composite. All lacking people are expiable. All validatory people are zodiacal. All bismuthic people are plump. Rozalie is not validatory.", "logic": "\nZodiacal(jordanna)\nComposite(rozalie)\nPlump(vachel)\nComposite(vachel)\nExpiable(sheree)\nValidatory(sheree)\nPlump(sheree)\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) and Expiable(x) -> Validatory(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> Lacking(x))\nforall x (Expiable(x) and Validatory(x) -> Bismuthic(x))\nforall x (Expiable(x) -> Plump(x))\nforall x (Lacking(x) and Plump(x) -> Composite(x))\nforall x (Lacking(x) -> Expiable(x))\nforall x (Validatory(x) -> Zodiacal(x))\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) -> Plump(x))\n\nnot Validatory(rozalie)\n\nforall x (Bismuthic(x) and Expiable(x) -> Validatory(x)) <- forall x (Expiable(x) and Validatory(x) -> Bismuthic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Malia is affixed. Mason is zoological. Carlen is slanderous. Carlen is zoological. Edna is maroon. Edna is monovular. Edna is slanderous. Nice, maroon people are monovular. Nice people are volcanic. All maroon, monovular people are squatty. Kind people are slanderous. Smart, slanderous people are zoological. All volcanic people are maroon. All monovular people are affixed. All squatty people are slanderous. Carlen is squatty.", "logic": "\nAffixed(malia)\nZoological(mason)\nSlanderous(carlen)\nZoological(carlen)\nMaroon(edna)\nMonovular(edna)\nSlanderous(edna)\nforall x (Squatty(x) and Maroon(x) -> Monovular(x))\nforall x (Squatty(x) -> Volcanic(x))\nforall x (Maroon(x) and Monovular(x) -> Squatty(x))\nforall x (Maroon(x) -> Slanderous(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) and Slanderous(x) -> Zoological(x))\nforall x (Volcanic(x) -> Maroon(x))\nforall x (Monovular(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Squatty(x) -> Slanderous(x))\n\nSquatty(carlen)\n\nforall x (Maroon(x) and Monovular(x) -> Squatty(x)) <- forall x (Squatty(x) and Maroon(x) -> Monovular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Sven is depressing. Gustav is received. Terrye is nigerien. Terrye is received. Red is sworn. Red is proverbial. Red is nigerien. Nice, sworn people are proverbial. Nice people are accentual. All sworn, proverbial people are clueless. Kind people are nigerien. Smart, nigerien people are received. All accentual people are sworn. All proverbial people are depressing. All clueless people are nigerien. Sven is not proverbial.", "logic": "\nDepressing(sven)\nReceived(gustav)\nNigerien(terrye)\nReceived(terrye)\nSworn(red)\nProverbial(red)\nNigerien(red)\nforall x (Clueless(x) and Sworn(x) -> Proverbial(x))\nforall x (Clueless(x) -> Accentual(x))\nforall x (Sworn(x) and Proverbial(x) -> Clueless(x))\nforall x (Sworn(x) -> Nigerien(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) and Nigerien(x) -> Received(x))\nforall x (Accentual(x) -> Sworn(x))\nforall x (Proverbial(x) -> Depressing(x))\nforall x (Clueless(x) -> Nigerien(x))\n\nnot Proverbial(sven)\n\nforall x (Clueless(x) and Sworn(x) -> Proverbial(x)) <- forall x (Sworn(x) and Proverbial(x) -> Clueless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "Gertruda is dodgy. Jenilee is appellant. Davy is boolean. Davy is appellant. Alvira is sneaking. Alvira is poetical. Alvira is boolean. Nice, sneaking people are poetical. Nice people are blind. All sneaking, poetical people are autistic. Kind people are boolean. Smart, boolean people are appellant. All blind people are sneaking. All poetical people are dodgy. All autistic people are boolean. Gertruda is sneaking.", "logic": "\nDodgy(gertruda)\nAppellant(jenilee)\nBoolean(davy)\nAppellant(davy)\nSneaking(alvira)\nPoetical(alvira)\nBoolean(alvira)\nforall x (Autistic(x) and Sneaking(x) -> Poetical(x))\nforall x (Autistic(x) -> Blind(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) and Poetical(x) -> Autistic(x))\nforall x (Sneaking(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) and Boolean(x) -> Appellant(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) -> Sneaking(x))\nforall x (Poetical(x) -> Dodgy(x))\nforall x (Autistic(x) -> Boolean(x))\n\nSneaking(gertruda)\n\nforall x (Blind(x) -> Sneaking(x)) <- forall x (Autistic(x) -> Blind(x)) <- forall x (Sneaking(x) and Poetical(x) -> Autistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1594"} {"premises": "The cindelyn palm the aggie. The cindelyn arrange the cati. The cati swap the cindelyn. The cati does not eat the cindelyn. The cati palm the aggie. The cati is not spotless. The cati is azotic. The cati does not need the cindelyn. The cati arrange the aggie. The aggie swap the cindelyn. The aggie palm the cati. The aggie is azotic. If the cati palm the cindelyn then the cindelyn does not chase the cati. If someone is variable then they need the aggie. If someone arrange the cati and the cati is botanical then they are variable. If someone swap the cindelyn and they do not eat the aggie then they eat the cindelyn. If someone is saudi then they eat the cindelyn. If someone swap the cindelyn and they eat the cati then the cati is botanical. If the cati palm the cindelyn and the cindelyn swap the aggie then the cindelyn is saudi. If someone arrange the aggie and they are not azotic then the aggie does not need the cati. The aggie palm the cati.", "logic": "\nPalm(cindelyn, aggie)\nArrange(cindelyn, cati)\nSwap(cati, cindelyn)\nnot Palm(cati, cindelyn)\nPalm(cati, aggie)\nnot Spotless(cati)\nAzotic(cati)\nnot Arrange(cati, cindelyn)\nArrange(cati, aggie)\nSwap(aggie, cindelyn)\nPalm(aggie, cati)\nAzotic(aggie)\nPalm(cati, cindelyn) -> not Swap(cindelyn, cati)\nforall x (Variable(x) -> Arrange(x, aggie))\nforall x (Arrange(x, cati) and Botanical(cati) -> Variable(x))\nforall x (Swap(x, cindelyn) and not Palm(x, aggie) -> Palm(x, cindelyn))\nforall x (Saudi(x) -> Palm(x, cindelyn))\nforall x (Swap(x, cindelyn) and Palm(x, cati) -> Botanical(cati))\nPalm(cati, cindelyn) and Swap(cindelyn, aggie) -> Saudi(cindelyn)\nforall x (Arrange(x, aggie) and not Azotic(x) -> not Arrange(aggie, cati))\n\nPalm(aggie, cati)\n\ntherefore Palm(aggie, cati)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The nonna humbug the jeremiah. The nonna exempt the kailey. The kailey intercept the nonna. The kailey does not eat the nonna. The kailey humbug the jeremiah. The kailey is not starving. The kailey is unalert. The kailey does not need the nonna. The kailey exempt the jeremiah. The jeremiah intercept the nonna. The jeremiah humbug the kailey. The jeremiah is unalert. If the kailey humbug the nonna then the nonna does not chase the kailey. If someone is generative then they need the jeremiah. If someone exempt the kailey and the kailey is unsheathed then they are generative. If someone intercept the nonna and they do not eat the jeremiah then they eat the nonna. If someone is sisterly then they eat the nonna. If someone intercept the nonna and they eat the kailey then the kailey is unsheathed. If the kailey humbug the nonna and the nonna intercept the jeremiah then the nonna is sisterly. If someone exempt the jeremiah and they are not unalert then the jeremiah does not need the kailey. The jeremiah does not chase the nonna.", "logic": "\nHumbug(nonna, jeremiah)\nExempt(nonna, kailey)\nIntercept(kailey, nonna)\nnot Humbug(kailey, nonna)\nHumbug(kailey, jeremiah)\nnot Starving(kailey)\nUnalert(kailey)\nnot Exempt(kailey, nonna)\nExempt(kailey, jeremiah)\nIntercept(jeremiah, nonna)\nHumbug(jeremiah, kailey)\nUnalert(jeremiah)\nHumbug(kailey, nonna) -> not Intercept(nonna, kailey)\nforall x (Generative(x) -> Exempt(x, jeremiah))\nforall x (Exempt(x, kailey) and Unsheathed(kailey) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Intercept(x, nonna) and not Humbug(x, jeremiah) -> Humbug(x, nonna))\nforall x (Sisterly(x) -> Humbug(x, nonna))\nforall x (Intercept(x, nonna) and Humbug(x, kailey) -> Unsheathed(kailey))\nHumbug(kailey, nonna) and Intercept(nonna, jeremiah) -> Sisterly(nonna)\nforall x (Exempt(x, jeremiah) and not Unalert(x) -> not Exempt(jeremiah, kailey))\n\nnot Intercept(jeremiah, nonna)\n\ntherefore Intercept(jeremiah, nonna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The jefferey prance the myrtle. The jefferey sprain the sisile. The sisile fire the jefferey. The sisile does not eat the jefferey. The sisile prance the myrtle. The sisile is not churchly. The sisile is underway. The sisile does not need the jefferey. The sisile sprain the myrtle. The myrtle fire the jefferey. The myrtle prance the sisile. The myrtle is underway. If the sisile prance the jefferey then the jefferey does not chase the sisile. If someone is sear then they need the myrtle. If someone sprain the sisile and the sisile is stooped then they are sear. If someone fire the jefferey and they do not eat the myrtle then they eat the jefferey. If someone is sultry then they eat the jefferey. If someone fire the jefferey and they eat the sisile then the sisile is stooped. If the sisile prance the jefferey and the jefferey fire the myrtle then the jefferey is sultry. If someone sprain the myrtle and they are not underway then the myrtle does not need the sisile. The sisile is stooped.", "logic": "\nPrance(jefferey, myrtle)\nSprain(jefferey, sisile)\nFire(sisile, jefferey)\nnot Prance(sisile, jefferey)\nPrance(sisile, myrtle)\nnot Churchly(sisile)\nUnderway(sisile)\nnot Sprain(sisile, jefferey)\nSprain(sisile, myrtle)\nFire(myrtle, jefferey)\nPrance(myrtle, sisile)\nUnderway(myrtle)\nPrance(sisile, jefferey) -> not Fire(jefferey, sisile)\nforall x (Sear(x) -> Sprain(x, myrtle))\nforall x (Sprain(x, sisile) and Stooped(sisile) -> Sear(x))\nforall x (Fire(x, jefferey) and not Prance(x, myrtle) -> Prance(x, jefferey))\nforall x (Sultry(x) -> Prance(x, jefferey))\nforall x (Fire(x, jefferey) and Prance(x, sisile) -> Stooped(sisile))\nPrance(sisile, jefferey) and Fire(jefferey, myrtle) -> Sultry(jefferey)\nforall x (Sprain(x, myrtle) and not Underway(x) -> not Sprain(myrtle, sisile))\n\nStooped(sisile)\n\nFire(myrtle, jefferey) and Prance(myrtle, sisile) and forall x (Fire(x, jefferey) and Prance(x, sisile) -> Stooped(sisile)) -> therefore Stooped(sisile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The ranice espy the della. The ranice trend the hulda. The hulda unstaple the ranice. The hulda does not eat the ranice. The hulda espy the della. The hulda is not whiskered. The hulda is dumbstruck. The hulda does not need the ranice. The hulda trend the della. The della unstaple the ranice. The della espy the hulda. The della is dumbstruck. If the hulda espy the ranice then the ranice does not chase the hulda. If someone is malay then they need the della. If someone trend the hulda and the hulda is doomed then they are malay. If someone unstaple the ranice and they do not eat the della then they eat the ranice. If someone is seedy then they eat the ranice. If someone unstaple the ranice and they eat the hulda then the hulda is doomed. If the hulda espy the ranice and the ranice unstaple the della then the ranice is seedy. If someone trend the della and they are not dumbstruck then the della does not need the hulda. The hulda is not doomed.", "logic": "\nEspy(ranice, della)\nTrend(ranice, hulda)\nUnstaple(hulda, ranice)\nnot Espy(hulda, ranice)\nEspy(hulda, della)\nnot Whiskered(hulda)\nDumbstruck(hulda)\nnot Trend(hulda, ranice)\nTrend(hulda, della)\nUnstaple(della, ranice)\nEspy(della, hulda)\nDumbstruck(della)\nEspy(hulda, ranice) -> not Unstaple(ranice, hulda)\nforall x (Malay(x) -> Trend(x, della))\nforall x (Trend(x, hulda) and Doomed(hulda) -> Malay(x))\nforall x (Unstaple(x, ranice) and not Espy(x, della) -> Espy(x, ranice))\nforall x (Seedy(x) -> Espy(x, ranice))\nforall x (Unstaple(x, ranice) and Espy(x, hulda) -> Doomed(hulda))\nEspy(hulda, ranice) and Unstaple(ranice, della) -> Seedy(ranice)\nforall x (Trend(x, della) and not Dumbstruck(x) -> not Trend(della, hulda))\n\nnot Doomed(hulda)\n\nUnstaple(della, ranice) and Espy(della, hulda) and forall x (Unstaple(x, ranice) and Espy(x, hulda) -> Doomed(hulda)) -> therefore Doomed(hulda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The antonino exposit the oralle. The antonino zero the mika. The mika welter the antonino. The mika does not eat the antonino. The mika exposit the oralle. The mika is not syrian. The mika is filipino. The mika does not need the antonino. The mika zero the oralle. The oralle welter the antonino. The oralle exposit the mika. The oralle is filipino. If the mika exposit the antonino then the antonino does not chase the mika. If someone is galled then they need the oralle. If someone zero the mika and the mika is roughened then they are galled. If someone welter the antonino and they do not eat the oralle then they eat the antonino. If someone is coincident then they eat the antonino. If someone welter the antonino and they eat the mika then the mika is roughened. If the mika exposit the antonino and the antonino welter the oralle then the antonino is coincident. If someone zero the oralle and they are not filipino then the oralle does not need the mika. The antonino is galled.", "logic": "\nExposit(antonino, oralle)\nZero(antonino, mika)\nWelter(mika, antonino)\nnot Exposit(mika, antonino)\nExposit(mika, oralle)\nnot Syrian(mika)\nFilipino(mika)\nnot Zero(mika, antonino)\nZero(mika, oralle)\nWelter(oralle, antonino)\nExposit(oralle, mika)\nFilipino(oralle)\nExposit(mika, antonino) -> not Welter(antonino, mika)\nforall x (Galled(x) -> Zero(x, oralle))\nforall x (Zero(x, mika) and Roughened(mika) -> Galled(x))\nforall x (Welter(x, antonino) and not Exposit(x, oralle) -> Exposit(x, antonino))\nforall x (Coincident(x) -> Exposit(x, antonino))\nforall x (Welter(x, antonino) and Exposit(x, mika) -> Roughened(mika))\nExposit(mika, antonino) and Welter(antonino, oralle) -> Coincident(antonino)\nforall x (Zero(x, oralle) and not Filipino(x) -> not Zero(oralle, mika))\n\nGalled(antonino)\n\nWelter(oralle, antonino) and Exposit(oralle, mika) and forall x (Welter(x, antonino) and Exposit(x, mika) -> Roughened(mika)) -> therefore Roughened(mika) Zero(antonino, mika) and Roughened(mika) and forall x (Zero(x, mika) and Roughened(mika) -> Galled(x)) -> therefore Galled(antonino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The kania smell the sigrid. The kania surfeit the nikkie. The nikkie immolate the kania. The nikkie does not eat the kania. The nikkie smell the sigrid. The nikkie is not unhurt. The nikkie is neoliberal. The nikkie does not need the kania. The nikkie surfeit the sigrid. The sigrid immolate the kania. The sigrid smell the nikkie. The sigrid is neoliberal. If the nikkie smell the kania then the kania does not chase the nikkie. If someone is expansive then they need the sigrid. If someone surfeit the nikkie and the nikkie is domed then they are expansive. If someone immolate the kania and they do not eat the sigrid then they eat the kania. If someone is cryptic then they eat the kania. If someone immolate the kania and they eat the nikkie then the nikkie is domed. If the nikkie smell the kania and the kania immolate the sigrid then the kania is cryptic. If someone surfeit the sigrid and they are not neoliberal then the sigrid does not need the nikkie. The kania is not expansive.", "logic": "\nSmell(kania, sigrid)\nSurfeit(kania, nikkie)\nImmolate(nikkie, kania)\nnot Smell(nikkie, kania)\nSmell(nikkie, sigrid)\nnot Unhurt(nikkie)\nNeoliberal(nikkie)\nnot Surfeit(nikkie, kania)\nSurfeit(nikkie, sigrid)\nImmolate(sigrid, kania)\nSmell(sigrid, nikkie)\nNeoliberal(sigrid)\nSmell(nikkie, kania) -> not Immolate(kania, nikkie)\nforall x (Expansive(x) -> Surfeit(x, sigrid))\nforall x (Surfeit(x, nikkie) and Domed(nikkie) -> Expansive(x))\nforall x (Immolate(x, kania) and not Smell(x, sigrid) -> Smell(x, kania))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) -> Smell(x, kania))\nforall x (Immolate(x, kania) and Smell(x, nikkie) -> Domed(nikkie))\nSmell(nikkie, kania) and Immolate(kania, sigrid) -> Cryptic(kania)\nforall x (Surfeit(x, sigrid) and not Neoliberal(x) -> not Surfeit(sigrid, nikkie))\n\nnot Expansive(kania)\n\nImmolate(sigrid, kania) and Smell(sigrid, nikkie) and forall x (Immolate(x, kania) and Smell(x, nikkie) -> Domed(nikkie)) -> therefore Domed(nikkie) Surfeit(kania, nikkie) and Domed(nikkie) and forall x (Surfeit(x, nikkie) and Domed(nikkie) -> Expansive(x)) -> therefore Expansive(kania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The lari commute the cristina. The lari calumniate the juana. The juana groom the lari. The juana does not eat the lari. The juana commute the cristina. The juana is not oneiric. The juana is tantrik. The juana does not need the lari. The juana calumniate the cristina. The cristina groom the lari. The cristina commute the juana. The cristina is tantrik. If the juana commute the lari then the lari does not chase the juana. If someone is charcoal then they need the cristina. If someone calumniate the juana and the juana is unchaste then they are charcoal. If someone groom the lari and they do not eat the cristina then they eat the lari. If someone is rejected then they eat the lari. If someone groom the lari and they eat the juana then the juana is unchaste. If the juana commute the lari and the lari groom the cristina then the lari is rejected. If someone calumniate the cristina and they are not tantrik then the cristina does not need the juana. The lari calumniate the cristina.", "logic": "\nCommute(lari, cristina)\nCalumniate(lari, juana)\nGroom(juana, lari)\nnot Commute(juana, lari)\nCommute(juana, cristina)\nnot Oneiric(juana)\nTantrik(juana)\nnot Calumniate(juana, lari)\nCalumniate(juana, cristina)\nGroom(cristina, lari)\nCommute(cristina, juana)\nTantrik(cristina)\nCommute(juana, lari) -> not Groom(lari, juana)\nforall x (Charcoal(x) -> Calumniate(x, cristina))\nforall x (Calumniate(x, juana) and Unchaste(juana) -> Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Groom(x, lari) and not Commute(x, cristina) -> Commute(x, lari))\nforall x (Rejected(x) -> Commute(x, lari))\nforall x (Groom(x, lari) and Commute(x, juana) -> Unchaste(juana))\nCommute(juana, lari) and Groom(lari, cristina) -> Rejected(lari)\nforall x (Calumniate(x, cristina) and not Tantrik(x) -> not Calumniate(cristina, juana))\n\nCalumniate(lari, cristina)\n\nGroom(cristina, lari) and Commute(cristina, juana) and forall x (Groom(x, lari) and Commute(x, juana) -> Unchaste(juana)) -> therefore Unchaste(juana) Calumniate(lari, juana) and Unchaste(juana) and forall x (Calumniate(x, juana) and Unchaste(juana) -> Charcoal(x)) -> therefore Charcoal(lari) Charcoal(lari) and forall x (Charcoal(x) -> Calumniate(x, cristina)) -> therefore Calumniate(lari, cristina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The inger manifest the heather. The inger retry the fernanda. The fernanda fine the inger. The fernanda does not eat the inger. The fernanda manifest the heather. The fernanda is not rightist. The fernanda is jihadi. The fernanda does not need the inger. The fernanda retry the heather. The heather fine the inger. The heather manifest the fernanda. The heather is jihadi. If the fernanda manifest the inger then the inger does not chase the fernanda. If someone is underdone then they need the heather. If someone retry the fernanda and the fernanda is ectodermal then they are underdone. If someone fine the inger and they do not eat the heather then they eat the inger. If someone is encased then they eat the inger. If someone fine the inger and they eat the fernanda then the fernanda is ectodermal. If the fernanda manifest the inger and the inger fine the heather then the inger is encased. If someone retry the heather and they are not jihadi then the heather does not need the fernanda. The inger does not need the heather.", "logic": "\nManifest(inger, heather)\nRetry(inger, fernanda)\nFine(fernanda, inger)\nnot Manifest(fernanda, inger)\nManifest(fernanda, heather)\nnot Rightist(fernanda)\nJihadi(fernanda)\nnot Retry(fernanda, inger)\nRetry(fernanda, heather)\nFine(heather, inger)\nManifest(heather, fernanda)\nJihadi(heather)\nManifest(fernanda, inger) -> not Fine(inger, fernanda)\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> Retry(x, heather))\nforall x (Retry(x, fernanda) and Ectodermal(fernanda) -> Underdone(x))\nforall x (Fine(x, inger) and not Manifest(x, heather) -> Manifest(x, inger))\nforall x (Encased(x) -> Manifest(x, inger))\nforall x (Fine(x, inger) and Manifest(x, fernanda) -> Ectodermal(fernanda))\nManifest(fernanda, inger) and Fine(inger, heather) -> Encased(inger)\nforall x (Retry(x, heather) and not Jihadi(x) -> not Retry(heather, fernanda))\n\nnot Retry(inger, heather)\n\nFine(heather, inger) and Manifest(heather, fernanda) and forall x (Fine(x, inger) and Manifest(x, fernanda) -> Ectodermal(fernanda)) -> therefore Ectodermal(fernanda) Retry(inger, fernanda) and Ectodermal(fernanda) and forall x (Retry(x, fernanda) and Ectodermal(fernanda) -> Underdone(x)) -> therefore Underdone(inger) Underdone(inger) and forall x (Underdone(x) -> Retry(x, heather)) -> therefore Retry(inger, heather)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The robenia swirl the vita. The robenia quarrel the daryn. The daryn falsify the robenia. The daryn does not eat the robenia. The daryn swirl the vita. The daryn is not marked. The daryn is nonslip. The daryn does not need the robenia. The daryn quarrel the vita. The vita falsify the robenia. The vita swirl the daryn. The vita is nonslip. If the daryn swirl the robenia then the robenia does not chase the daryn. If someone is gruff then they need the vita. If someone quarrel the daryn and the daryn is lunate then they are gruff. If someone falsify the robenia and they do not eat the vita then they eat the robenia. If someone is plotted then they eat the robenia. If someone falsify the robenia and they eat the daryn then the daryn is lunate. If the daryn swirl the robenia and the robenia falsify the vita then the robenia is plotted. If someone quarrel the vita and they are not nonslip then the vita does not need the daryn. The vita is not gruff.", "logic": "\nSwirl(robenia, vita)\nQuarrel(robenia, daryn)\nFalsify(daryn, robenia)\nnot Swirl(daryn, robenia)\nSwirl(daryn, vita)\nnot Marked(daryn)\nNonslip(daryn)\nnot Quarrel(daryn, robenia)\nQuarrel(daryn, vita)\nFalsify(vita, robenia)\nSwirl(vita, daryn)\nNonslip(vita)\nSwirl(daryn, robenia) -> not Falsify(robenia, daryn)\nforall x (Gruff(x) -> Quarrel(x, vita))\nforall x (Quarrel(x, daryn) and Lunate(daryn) -> Gruff(x))\nforall x (Falsify(x, robenia) and not Swirl(x, vita) -> Swirl(x, robenia))\nforall x (Plotted(x) -> Swirl(x, robenia))\nforall x (Falsify(x, robenia) and Swirl(x, daryn) -> Lunate(daryn))\nSwirl(daryn, robenia) and Falsify(robenia, vita) -> Plotted(robenia)\nforall x (Quarrel(x, vita) and not Nonslip(x) -> not Quarrel(vita, daryn))\n\nnot Gruff(vita)\n\nforall x (Quarrel(x, daryn) and Lunate(daryn) -> Gruff(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The avi embed the audrey. The avi jazz the berke. The berke subpoena the avi. The berke does not eat the avi. The berke embed the audrey. The berke is not unplanted. The berke is squat. The berke does not need the avi. The berke jazz the audrey. The audrey subpoena the avi. The audrey embed the berke. The audrey is squat. If the berke embed the avi then the avi does not chase the berke. If someone is sibylline then they need the audrey. If someone jazz the berke and the berke is neotenic then they are sibylline. If someone subpoena the avi and they do not eat the audrey then they eat the avi. If someone is pediatric then they eat the avi. If someone subpoena the avi and they eat the berke then the berke is neotenic. If the berke embed the avi and the avi subpoena the audrey then the avi is pediatric. If someone jazz the audrey and they are not squat then the audrey does not need the berke. The berke is sibylline.", "logic": "\nEmbed(avi, audrey)\nJazz(avi, berke)\nSubpoena(berke, avi)\nnot Embed(berke, avi)\nEmbed(berke, audrey)\nnot Unplanted(berke)\nSquat(berke)\nnot Jazz(berke, avi)\nJazz(berke, audrey)\nSubpoena(audrey, avi)\nEmbed(audrey, berke)\nSquat(audrey)\nEmbed(berke, avi) -> not Subpoena(avi, berke)\nforall x (Sibylline(x) -> Jazz(x, audrey))\nforall x (Jazz(x, berke) and Neotenic(berke) -> Sibylline(x))\nforall x (Subpoena(x, avi) and not Embed(x, audrey) -> Embed(x, avi))\nforall x (Pediatric(x) -> Embed(x, avi))\nforall x (Subpoena(x, avi) and Embed(x, berke) -> Neotenic(berke))\nEmbed(berke, avi) and Subpoena(avi, audrey) -> Pediatric(avi)\nforall x (Jazz(x, audrey) and not Squat(x) -> not Jazz(audrey, berke))\n\nSibylline(berke)\n\nforall x (Jazz(x, berke) and Neotenic(berke) -> Sibylline(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The giovanna catechise the floris. The giovanna peal the rheta. The rheta comport the giovanna. The rheta does not eat the giovanna. The rheta catechise the floris. The rheta is not subatomic. The rheta is anadromous. The rheta does not need the giovanna. The rheta peal the floris. The floris comport the giovanna. The floris catechise the rheta. The floris is anadromous. If the rheta catechise the giovanna then the giovanna does not chase the rheta. If someone is prolate then they need the floris. If someone peal the rheta and the rheta is sadistic then they are prolate. If someone comport the giovanna and they do not eat the floris then they eat the giovanna. If someone is flaky then they eat the giovanna. If someone comport the giovanna and they eat the rheta then the rheta is sadistic. If the rheta catechise the giovanna and the giovanna comport the floris then the giovanna is flaky. If someone peal the floris and they are not anadromous then the floris does not need the rheta. The floris does not eat the giovanna.", "logic": "\nCatechise(giovanna, floris)\nPeal(giovanna, rheta)\nComport(rheta, giovanna)\nnot Catechise(rheta, giovanna)\nCatechise(rheta, floris)\nnot Subatomic(rheta)\nAnadromous(rheta)\nnot Peal(rheta, giovanna)\nPeal(rheta, floris)\nComport(floris, giovanna)\nCatechise(floris, rheta)\nAnadromous(floris)\nCatechise(rheta, giovanna) -> not Comport(giovanna, rheta)\nforall x (Prolate(x) -> Peal(x, floris))\nforall x (Peal(x, rheta) and Sadistic(rheta) -> Prolate(x))\nforall x (Comport(x, giovanna) and not Catechise(x, floris) -> Catechise(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Flaky(x) -> Catechise(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Comport(x, giovanna) and Catechise(x, rheta) -> Sadistic(rheta))\nCatechise(rheta, giovanna) and Comport(giovanna, floris) -> Flaky(giovanna)\nforall x (Peal(x, floris) and not Anadromous(x) -> not Peal(floris, rheta))\n\nnot Catechise(floris, giovanna)\n\nforall x (Comport(x, giovanna) and not Catechise(x, floris) -> Catechise(x, giovanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The brena eject the caesar. The brena block the joey. The joey obtain the brena. The joey does not eat the brena. The joey eject the caesar. The joey is not cardiac. The joey is planned. The joey does not need the brena. The joey block the caesar. The caesar obtain the brena. The caesar eject the joey. The caesar is planned. If the joey eject the brena then the brena does not chase the joey. If someone is maleficent then they need the caesar. If someone block the joey and the joey is unmixable then they are maleficent. If someone obtain the brena and they do not eat the caesar then they eat the brena. If someone is risque then they eat the brena. If someone obtain the brena and they eat the joey then the joey is unmixable. If the joey eject the brena and the brena obtain the caesar then the brena is risque. If someone block the caesar and they are not planned then the caesar does not need the joey. The brena is risque.", "logic": "\nEject(brena, caesar)\nBlock(brena, joey)\nObtain(joey, brena)\nnot Eject(joey, brena)\nEject(joey, caesar)\nnot Cardiac(joey)\nPlanned(joey)\nnot Block(joey, brena)\nBlock(joey, caesar)\nObtain(caesar, brena)\nEject(caesar, joey)\nPlanned(caesar)\nEject(joey, brena) -> not Obtain(brena, joey)\nforall x (Maleficent(x) -> Block(x, caesar))\nforall x (Block(x, joey) and Unmixable(joey) -> Maleficent(x))\nforall x (Obtain(x, brena) and not Eject(x, caesar) -> Eject(x, brena))\nforall x (Risque(x) -> Eject(x, brena))\nforall x (Obtain(x, brena) and Eject(x, joey) -> Unmixable(joey))\nEject(joey, brena) and Obtain(brena, caesar) -> Risque(brena)\nforall x (Block(x, caesar) and not Planned(x) -> not Block(caesar, joey))\n\nRisque(brena)\n\nEject(joey, brena) and Obtain(brena, caesar) -> Risque(brena) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The thea notify the giovanne. The thea accession the isobel. The isobel furl the thea. The isobel does not eat the thea. The isobel notify the giovanne. The isobel is not jolly. The isobel is ripened. The isobel does not need the thea. The isobel accession the giovanne. The giovanne furl the thea. The giovanne notify the isobel. The giovanne is ripened. If the isobel notify the thea then the thea does not chase the isobel. If someone is hellish then they need the giovanne. If someone accession the isobel and the isobel is abducent then they are hellish. If someone furl the thea and they do not eat the giovanne then they eat the thea. If someone is rateable then they eat the thea. If someone furl the thea and they eat the isobel then the isobel is abducent. If the isobel notify the thea and the thea furl the giovanne then the thea is rateable. If someone accession the giovanne and they are not ripened then the giovanne does not need the isobel. The isobel does not chase the isobel.", "logic": "\nNotify(thea, giovanne)\nAccession(thea, isobel)\nFurl(isobel, thea)\nnot Notify(isobel, thea)\nNotify(isobel, giovanne)\nnot Jolly(isobel)\nRipened(isobel)\nnot Accession(isobel, thea)\nAccession(isobel, giovanne)\nFurl(giovanne, thea)\nNotify(giovanne, isobel)\nRipened(giovanne)\nNotify(isobel, thea) -> not Furl(thea, isobel)\nforall x (Hellish(x) -> Accession(x, giovanne))\nforall x (Accession(x, isobel) and Abducent(isobel) -> Hellish(x))\nforall x (Furl(x, thea) and not Notify(x, giovanne) -> Notify(x, thea))\nforall x (Rateable(x) -> Notify(x, thea))\nforall x (Furl(x, thea) and Notify(x, isobel) -> Abducent(isobel))\nNotify(isobel, thea) and Furl(thea, giovanne) -> Rateable(thea)\nforall x (Accession(x, giovanne) and not Ripened(x) -> not Accession(giovanne, isobel))\n\nnot Furl(isobel, isobel)\n\nnot Furl(isobel, isobel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The maritsa tame the christa. The maritsa rant the rudy. The rudy putt the maritsa. The rudy does not eat the maritsa. The rudy tame the christa. The rudy is not rollicking. The rudy is servile. The rudy does not need the maritsa. The rudy rant the christa. The christa putt the maritsa. The christa tame the rudy. The christa is servile. If the rudy tame the maritsa then the maritsa does not chase the rudy. If someone is andorran then they need the christa. If someone rant the rudy and the rudy is epidermal then they are andorran. If someone putt the maritsa and they do not eat the christa then they eat the maritsa. If someone is somnolent then they eat the maritsa. If someone putt the maritsa and they eat the rudy then the rudy is epidermal. If the rudy tame the maritsa and the maritsa putt the christa then the maritsa is somnolent. If someone rant the christa and they are not servile then the christa does not need the rudy. The maritsa putt the rudy.", "logic": "\nTame(maritsa, christa)\nRant(maritsa, rudy)\nPutt(rudy, maritsa)\nnot Tame(rudy, maritsa)\nTame(rudy, christa)\nnot Rollicking(rudy)\nServile(rudy)\nnot Rant(rudy, maritsa)\nRant(rudy, christa)\nPutt(christa, maritsa)\nTame(christa, rudy)\nServile(christa)\nTame(rudy, maritsa) -> not Putt(maritsa, rudy)\nforall x (Andorran(x) -> Rant(x, christa))\nforall x (Rant(x, rudy) and Epidermal(rudy) -> Andorran(x))\nforall x (Putt(x, maritsa) and not Tame(x, christa) -> Tame(x, maritsa))\nforall x (Somnolent(x) -> Tame(x, maritsa))\nforall x (Putt(x, maritsa) and Tame(x, rudy) -> Epidermal(rudy))\nTame(rudy, maritsa) and Putt(maritsa, christa) -> Somnolent(maritsa)\nforall x (Rant(x, christa) and not Servile(x) -> not Rant(christa, rudy))\n\nPutt(maritsa, rudy)\n\nPutt(maritsa, rudy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The kat liquify the allianora. The kat interact the teryl. The teryl salvage the kat. The teryl does not eat the kat. The teryl liquify the allianora. The teryl is not homely. The teryl is lite. The teryl does not need the kat. The teryl interact the allianora. The allianora salvage the kat. The allianora liquify the teryl. The allianora is lite. If the teryl liquify the kat then the kat does not chase the teryl. If someone is invariant then they need the allianora. If someone interact the teryl and the teryl is vitriolic then they are invariant. If someone salvage the kat and they do not eat the allianora then they eat the kat. If someone is equanimous then they eat the kat. If someone salvage the kat and they eat the teryl then the teryl is vitriolic. If the teryl liquify the kat and the kat salvage the allianora then the kat is equanimous. If someone interact the allianora and they are not lite then the allianora does not need the teryl. The allianora is not equanimous.", "logic": "\nLiquify(kat, allianora)\nInteract(kat, teryl)\nSalvage(teryl, kat)\nnot Liquify(teryl, kat)\nLiquify(teryl, allianora)\nnot Homely(teryl)\nLite(teryl)\nnot Interact(teryl, kat)\nInteract(teryl, allianora)\nSalvage(allianora, kat)\nLiquify(allianora, teryl)\nLite(allianora)\nLiquify(teryl, kat) -> not Salvage(kat, teryl)\nforall x (Invariant(x) -> Interact(x, allianora))\nforall x (Interact(x, teryl) and Vitriolic(teryl) -> Invariant(x))\nforall x (Salvage(x, kat) and not Liquify(x, allianora) -> Liquify(x, kat))\nforall x (Equanimous(x) -> Liquify(x, kat))\nforall x (Salvage(x, kat) and Liquify(x, teryl) -> Vitriolic(teryl))\nLiquify(teryl, kat) and Salvage(kat, allianora) -> Equanimous(kat)\nforall x (Interact(x, allianora) and not Lite(x) -> not Interact(allianora, teryl))\n\nnot Equanimous(allianora)\n\nnot Equanimous(allianora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "The whit diffuse the alan. The whit engild the inge. The inge mismate the whit. The inge does not eat the whit. The inge diffuse the alan. The inge is not pseudo. The inge is avian. The inge does not need the whit. The inge engild the alan. The alan mismate the whit. The alan diffuse the inge. The alan is avian. If the inge diffuse the whit then the whit does not chase the inge. If someone is acidulous then they need the alan. If someone engild the inge and the inge is waking then they are acidulous. If someone mismate the whit and they do not eat the alan then they eat the whit. If someone is legless then they eat the whit. If someone mismate the whit and they eat the inge then the inge is waking. If the inge diffuse the whit and the whit mismate the alan then the whit is legless. If someone engild the alan and they are not avian then the alan does not need the inge. The whit is pseudo.", "logic": "\nDiffuse(whit, alan)\nEngild(whit, inge)\nMismate(inge, whit)\nnot Diffuse(inge, whit)\nDiffuse(inge, alan)\nnot Pseudo(inge)\nAvian(inge)\nnot Engild(inge, whit)\nEngild(inge, alan)\nMismate(alan, whit)\nDiffuse(alan, inge)\nAvian(alan)\nDiffuse(inge, whit) -> not Mismate(whit, inge)\nforall x (Acidulous(x) -> Engild(x, alan))\nforall x (Engild(x, inge) and Waking(inge) -> Acidulous(x))\nforall x (Mismate(x, whit) and not Diffuse(x, alan) -> Diffuse(x, whit))\nforall x (Legless(x) -> Diffuse(x, whit))\nforall x (Mismate(x, whit) and Diffuse(x, inge) -> Waking(inge))\nDiffuse(inge, whit) and Mismate(whit, alan) -> Legless(whit)\nforall x (Engild(x, alan) and not Avian(x) -> not Engild(alan, inge))\n\nPseudo(whit)\n\nPseudo(whit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1113"} {"premises": "Vilhelm is glace. Isabel is flash. Isabel is formalised. Red things are ungrateful. All ungrateful, golden things are glace. If something is glace then it is formalised. All flash, twentieth things are glace. All twentieth things are empyrean. If Vilhelm is formalised then Vilhelm is flash. Furry, glace things are empyrean. If something is formalised and flash then it is twentieth. Isabel is formalised.", "logic": "\nGlace(vilhelm)\nFlash(isabel)\nFormalised(isabel)\nforall x (Golden(x) -> Ungrateful(x))\nforall x (Ungrateful(x) and Golden(x) -> Glace(x))\nforall x (Glace(x) -> Formalised(x))\nforall x (Flash(x) and Twentieth(x) -> Glace(x))\nforall x (Twentieth(x) -> Empyrean(x))\nFormalised(vilhelm) -> Flash(vilhelm)\nforall x (Twentieth(x) and Glace(x) -> Empyrean(x))\nforall x (Formalised(x) and Flash(x) -> Twentieth(x))\n\nFormalised(isabel)\n\ntherefore Formalised(isabel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Cassandre is freelance. Nathanael is touchable. Nathanael is migratory. Red things are electrical. All electrical, sinful things are freelance. If something is freelance then it is migratory. All touchable, intolerant things are freelance. All intolerant things are choral. If Cassandre is migratory then Cassandre is touchable. Furry, freelance things are choral. If something is migratory and touchable then it is intolerant. Cassandre is not freelance.", "logic": "\nFreelance(cassandre)\nTouchable(nathanael)\nMigratory(nathanael)\nforall x (Sinful(x) -> Electrical(x))\nforall x (Electrical(x) and Sinful(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Freelance(x) -> Migratory(x))\nforall x (Touchable(x) and Intolerant(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Intolerant(x) -> Choral(x))\nMigratory(cassandre) -> Touchable(cassandre)\nforall x (Intolerant(x) and Freelance(x) -> Choral(x))\nforall x (Migratory(x) and Touchable(x) -> Intolerant(x))\n\nnot Freelance(cassandre)\n\ntherefore Freelance(cassandre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Orville is expandible. Dirk is caesarean. Dirk is longtime. Red things are dyed. All dyed, simplex things are expandible. If something is expandible then it is longtime. All caesarean, shoaly things are expandible. All shoaly things are charnel. If Orville is longtime then Orville is caesarean. Furry, expandible things are charnel. If something is longtime and caesarean then it is shoaly. Dirk is shoaly.", "logic": "\nExpandible(orville)\nCaesarean(dirk)\nLongtime(dirk)\nforall x (Simplex(x) -> Dyed(x))\nforall x (Dyed(x) and Simplex(x) -> Expandible(x))\nforall x (Expandible(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Caesarean(x) and Shoaly(x) -> Expandible(x))\nforall x (Shoaly(x) -> Charnel(x))\nLongtime(orville) -> Caesarean(orville)\nforall x (Shoaly(x) and Expandible(x) -> Charnel(x))\nforall x (Longtime(x) and Caesarean(x) -> Shoaly(x))\n\nShoaly(dirk)\n\nLongtime(dirk) and Caesarean(dirk) and forall x (Longtime(x) and Caesarean(x) -> Shoaly(x)) -> therefore Shoaly(dirk)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Tami is buttery. Sibby is unburdened. Sibby is finespun. Red things are cynical. All cynical, rubbery things are buttery. If something is buttery then it is finespun. All unburdened, undisputed things are buttery. All undisputed things are undetected. If Tami is finespun then Tami is unburdened. Furry, buttery things are undetected. If something is finespun and unburdened then it is undisputed. Sibby is not undisputed.", "logic": "\nButtery(tami)\nUnburdened(sibby)\nFinespun(sibby)\nforall x (Rubbery(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Cynical(x) and Rubbery(x) -> Buttery(x))\nforall x (Buttery(x) -> Finespun(x))\nforall x (Unburdened(x) and Undisputed(x) -> Buttery(x))\nforall x (Undisputed(x) -> Undetected(x))\nFinespun(tami) -> Unburdened(tami)\nforall x (Undisputed(x) and Buttery(x) -> Undetected(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) and Unburdened(x) -> Undisputed(x))\n\nnot Undisputed(sibby)\n\nFinespun(sibby) and Unburdened(sibby) and forall x (Finespun(x) and Unburdened(x) -> Undisputed(x)) -> therefore Undisputed(sibby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Melody is polytonal. Ivett is forcible. Ivett is contorted. Red things are chivalric. All chivalric, clangorous things are polytonal. If something is polytonal then it is contorted. All forcible, enticing things are polytonal. All enticing things are double. If Melody is contorted then Melody is forcible. Furry, polytonal things are double. If something is contorted and forcible then it is enticing. Melody is forcible.", "logic": "\nPolytonal(melody)\nForcible(ivett)\nContorted(ivett)\nforall x (Clangorous(x) -> Chivalric(x))\nforall x (Chivalric(x) and Clangorous(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Polytonal(x) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Forcible(x) and Enticing(x) -> Polytonal(x))\nforall x (Enticing(x) -> Double(x))\nContorted(melody) -> Forcible(melody)\nforall x (Enticing(x) and Polytonal(x) -> Double(x))\nforall x (Contorted(x) and Forcible(x) -> Enticing(x))\n\nForcible(melody)\n\nPolytonal(melody) and forall x (Polytonal(x) -> Contorted(x)) -> therefore Contorted(melody) Contorted(melody) and Contorted(melody) -> Forcible(melody) -> therefore Forcible(melody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Ephrem is nonstop. Billi is horrid. Billi is awing. Red things are velar. All velar, cagy things are nonstop. If something is nonstop then it is awing. All horrid, trendy things are nonstop. All trendy things are monodical. If Ephrem is awing then Ephrem is horrid. Furry, nonstop things are monodical. If something is awing and horrid then it is trendy. Billi is not monodical.", "logic": "\nNonstop(ephrem)\nHorrid(billi)\nAwing(billi)\nforall x (Cagy(x) -> Velar(x))\nforall x (Velar(x) and Cagy(x) -> Nonstop(x))\nforall x (Nonstop(x) -> Awing(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) and Trendy(x) -> Nonstop(x))\nforall x (Trendy(x) -> Monodical(x))\nAwing(ephrem) -> Horrid(ephrem)\nforall x (Trendy(x) and Nonstop(x) -> Monodical(x))\nforall x (Awing(x) and Horrid(x) -> Trendy(x))\n\nnot Monodical(billi)\n\nAwing(billi) and Horrid(billi) and forall x (Awing(x) and Horrid(x) -> Trendy(x)) -> therefore Trendy(billi) Trendy(billi) and forall x (Trendy(x) -> Monodical(x)) -> therefore Monodical(billi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Peggi is wizardly. Maurine is pebbly. Maurine is perky. Red things are calorific. All calorific, foxy things are wizardly. If something is wizardly then it is perky. All pebbly, admired things are wizardly. All admired things are stripped. If Peggi is perky then Peggi is pebbly. Furry, wizardly things are stripped. If something is perky and pebbly then it is admired. Peggi is admired.", "logic": "\nWizardly(peggi)\nPebbly(maurine)\nPerky(maurine)\nforall x (Foxy(x) -> Calorific(x))\nforall x (Calorific(x) and Foxy(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Perky(x))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) and Admired(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) -> Stripped(x))\nPerky(peggi) -> Pebbly(peggi)\nforall x (Admired(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Stripped(x))\nforall x (Perky(x) and Pebbly(x) -> Admired(x))\n\nAdmired(peggi)\n\nWizardly(peggi) and forall x (Wizardly(x) -> Perky(x)) -> therefore Perky(peggi) Wizardly(peggi) and forall x (Wizardly(x) -> Perky(x)) -> therefore Perky(peggi) Perky(peggi) and Perky(peggi) -> Pebbly(peggi) -> therefore Pebbly(peggi) Perky(peggi) and Pebbly(peggi) and forall x (Perky(x) and Pebbly(x) -> Admired(x)) -> therefore Admired(peggi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Sonni is unionised. Ellynn is awakened. Ellynn is reanimated. Red things are drowsy. All drowsy, yankee things are unionised. If something is unionised then it is reanimated. All awakened, rescued things are unionised. All rescued things are piebald. If Sonni is reanimated then Sonni is awakened. Furry, unionised things are piebald. If something is reanimated and awakened then it is rescued. Sonni is not rescued.", "logic": "\nUnionised(sonni)\nAwakened(ellynn)\nReanimated(ellynn)\nforall x (Yankee(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) and Yankee(x) -> Unionised(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Awakened(x) and Rescued(x) -> Unionised(x))\nforall x (Rescued(x) -> Piebald(x))\nReanimated(sonni) -> Awakened(sonni)\nforall x (Rescued(x) and Unionised(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Reanimated(x) and Awakened(x) -> Rescued(x))\n\nnot Rescued(sonni)\n\nUnionised(sonni) and forall x (Unionised(x) -> Reanimated(x)) -> therefore Reanimated(sonni) Unionised(sonni) and forall x (Unionised(x) -> Reanimated(x)) -> therefore Reanimated(sonni) Reanimated(sonni) and Reanimated(sonni) -> Awakened(sonni) -> therefore Awakened(sonni) Reanimated(sonni) and Awakened(sonni) and forall x (Reanimated(x) and Awakened(x) -> Rescued(x)) -> therefore Rescued(sonni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Willdon is affordable. Alex is unlovable. Alex is hircine. Red things are upraised. All upraised, worn things are affordable. If something is affordable then it is hircine. All unlovable, tops things are affordable. All tops things are cuneate. If Willdon is hircine then Willdon is unlovable. Furry, affordable things are cuneate. If something is hircine and unlovable then it is tops. Willdon is not upraised.", "logic": "\nAffordable(willdon)\nUnlovable(alex)\nHircine(alex)\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Upraised(x))\nforall x (Upraised(x) and Worn(x) -> Affordable(x))\nforall x (Affordable(x) -> Hircine(x))\nforall x (Unlovable(x) and Tops(x) -> Affordable(x))\nforall x (Tops(x) -> Cuneate(x))\nHircine(willdon) -> Unlovable(willdon)\nforall x (Tops(x) and Affordable(x) -> Cuneate(x))\nforall x (Hircine(x) and Unlovable(x) -> Tops(x))\n\nnot Upraised(willdon)\n\nforall x (Worn(x) -> Upraised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Lynn is subjugated. Adrien is billowy. Adrien is petalous. Red things are hesitant. All hesitant, starboard things are subjugated. If something is subjugated then it is petalous. All billowy, rugose things are subjugated. All rugose things are uneducated. If Lynn is petalous then Lynn is billowy. Furry, subjugated things are uneducated. If something is petalous and billowy then it is rugose. Adrien is hesitant.", "logic": "\nSubjugated(lynn)\nBillowy(adrien)\nPetalous(adrien)\nforall x (Starboard(x) -> Hesitant(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Starboard(x) -> Subjugated(x))\nforall x (Subjugated(x) -> Petalous(x))\nforall x (Billowy(x) and Rugose(x) -> Subjugated(x))\nforall x (Rugose(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nPetalous(lynn) -> Billowy(lynn)\nforall x (Rugose(x) and Subjugated(x) -> Uneducated(x))\nforall x (Petalous(x) and Billowy(x) -> Rugose(x))\n\nHesitant(adrien)\n\nforall x (Starboard(x) -> Hesitant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Patrick is bistred. Chas is seljuk. Chas is cavalier. Red things are padded. All padded, galilaean things are bistred. If something is bistred then it is cavalier. All seljuk, dashed things are bistred. All dashed things are archival. If Patrick is cavalier then Patrick is seljuk. Furry, bistred things are archival. If something is cavalier and seljuk then it is dashed. Patrick is not galilaean.", "logic": "\nBistred(patrick)\nSeljuk(chas)\nCavalier(chas)\nforall x (Galilaean(x) -> Padded(x))\nforall x (Padded(x) and Galilaean(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> Cavalier(x))\nforall x (Seljuk(x) and Dashed(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Dashed(x) -> Archival(x))\nCavalier(patrick) -> Seljuk(patrick)\nforall x (Dashed(x) and Bistred(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Cavalier(x) and Seljuk(x) -> Dashed(x))\n\nnot Galilaean(patrick)\n\nnot Galilaean(patrick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Aharon is untenable. Marcela is sworn. Marcela is alleviated. Red things are pledged. All pledged, siouan things are untenable. If something is untenable then it is alleviated. All sworn, convivial things are untenable. All convivial things are bronzy. If Aharon is alleviated then Aharon is sworn. Furry, untenable things are bronzy. If something is alleviated and sworn then it is convivial. Marcela is siouan.", "logic": "\nUntenable(aharon)\nSworn(marcela)\nAlleviated(marcela)\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> Pledged(x))\nforall x (Pledged(x) and Siouan(x) -> Untenable(x))\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> Alleviated(x))\nforall x (Sworn(x) and Convivial(x) -> Untenable(x))\nforall x (Convivial(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nAlleviated(aharon) -> Sworn(aharon)\nforall x (Convivial(x) and Untenable(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nforall x (Alleviated(x) and Sworn(x) -> Convivial(x))\n\nSiouan(marcela)\n\nSiouan(marcela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-355"} {"premises": "Elwina is unpromised. Elwina is emphasized. Elwina is numidian. Rozele is prosthetic. Rozele is buddhist. Rozele is numidian. Rochette is unpromised. Rochette is unshackled. Rochette is emphasized. Rochette is prosthetic. Madlin is unpromised. Madlin is emphasized. Madlin is prosthetic. Madlin is buddhist. Madlin is numidian. All unpromised people are buddhist. Elwina is unpromised.", "logic": "\nUnpromised(elwina)\nEmphasized(elwina)\nNumidian(elwina)\nProsthetic(rozele)\nBuddhist(rozele)\nNumidian(rozele)\nUnpromised(rochette)\nUnshackled(rochette)\nEmphasized(rochette)\nProsthetic(rochette)\nUnpromised(madlin)\nEmphasized(madlin)\nProsthetic(madlin)\nBuddhist(madlin)\nNumidian(madlin)\nforall x (Unpromised(x) -> Buddhist(x))\n\nUnpromised(elwina)\n\ntherefore Unpromised(elwina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "Dorcas is petulant. Dorcas is stomatal. Dorcas is syrupy. Tobe is failing. Tobe is sozzled. Tobe is syrupy. Reuben is petulant. Reuben is powerless. Reuben is stomatal. Reuben is failing. Jonah is petulant. Jonah is stomatal. Jonah is failing. Jonah is sozzled. Jonah is syrupy. All petulant people are sozzled. Jonah is not sozzled.", "logic": "\nPetulant(dorcas)\nStomatal(dorcas)\nSyrupy(dorcas)\nFailing(tobe)\nSozzled(tobe)\nSyrupy(tobe)\nPetulant(reuben)\nPowerless(reuben)\nStomatal(reuben)\nFailing(reuben)\nPetulant(jonah)\nStomatal(jonah)\nFailing(jonah)\nSozzled(jonah)\nSyrupy(jonah)\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Sozzled(x))\n\nnot Sozzled(jonah)\n\ntherefore Sozzled(jonah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "Rhett is unasked. Rhett is globular. Rhett is fiery. Orin is uneventful. Orin is copasetic. Orin is fiery. Sandro is unasked. Sandro is mastoid. Sandro is globular. Sandro is uneventful. Halette is unasked. Halette is globular. Halette is uneventful. Halette is copasetic. Halette is fiery. All unasked people are copasetic. Sandro is copasetic.", "logic": "\nUnasked(rhett)\nGlobular(rhett)\nFiery(rhett)\nUneventful(orin)\nCopasetic(orin)\nFiery(orin)\nUnasked(sandro)\nMastoid(sandro)\nGlobular(sandro)\nUneventful(sandro)\nUnasked(halette)\nGlobular(halette)\nUneventful(halette)\nCopasetic(halette)\nFiery(halette)\nforall x (Unasked(x) -> Copasetic(x))\n\nCopasetic(sandro)\n\nUnasked(sandro) and forall x (Unasked(x) -> Copasetic(x)) -> therefore Copasetic(sandro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "Domenic is withered. Domenic is clitoric. Domenic is unlamented. Elke is unpaid. Elke is prefaded. Elke is unlamented. Aldis is withered. Aldis is figural. Aldis is clitoric. Aldis is unpaid. Sebastien is withered. Sebastien is clitoric. Sebastien is unpaid. Sebastien is prefaded. Sebastien is unlamented. All withered people are prefaded. Domenic is not prefaded.", "logic": "\nWithered(domenic)\nClitoric(domenic)\nUnlamented(domenic)\nUnpaid(elke)\nPrefaded(elke)\nUnlamented(elke)\nWithered(aldis)\nFigural(aldis)\nClitoric(aldis)\nUnpaid(aldis)\nWithered(sebastien)\nClitoric(sebastien)\nUnpaid(sebastien)\nPrefaded(sebastien)\nUnlamented(sebastien)\nforall x (Withered(x) -> Prefaded(x))\n\nnot Prefaded(domenic)\n\nWithered(domenic) and forall x (Withered(x) -> Prefaded(x)) -> therefore Prefaded(domenic)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "Elie is bicentric. Elie is phonologic. Elie is waiting. Sumner is jade. Sumner is lossy. Sumner is waiting. Selena is bicentric. Selena is unearthly. Selena is phonologic. Selena is jade. Oscar is bicentric. Oscar is phonologic. Oscar is jade. Oscar is lossy. Oscar is waiting. All bicentric people are lossy. Elie is not young.", "logic": "\nBicentric(elie)\nPhonologic(elie)\nWaiting(elie)\nJade(sumner)\nLossy(sumner)\nWaiting(sumner)\nBicentric(selena)\nUnearthly(selena)\nPhonologic(selena)\nJade(selena)\nBicentric(oscar)\nPhonologic(oscar)\nJade(oscar)\nLossy(oscar)\nWaiting(oscar)\nforall x (Bicentric(x) -> Lossy(x))\n\nnot Young(elie)\n\nnot Young(elie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "Teador is paradisal. Teador is astomatal. Teador is occupied. Viviana is heartless. Viviana is budding. Viviana is occupied. Cristine is paradisal. Cristine is offhand. Cristine is astomatal. Cristine is heartless. Nealy is paradisal. Nealy is astomatal. Nealy is heartless. Nealy is budding. Nealy is occupied. All paradisal people are budding. Viviana is offhand.", "logic": "\nParadisal(teador)\nAstomatal(teador)\nOccupied(teador)\nHeartless(viviana)\nBudding(viviana)\nOccupied(viviana)\nParadisal(cristine)\nOffhand(cristine)\nAstomatal(cristine)\nHeartless(cristine)\nParadisal(nealy)\nAstomatal(nealy)\nHeartless(nealy)\nBudding(nealy)\nOccupied(nealy)\nforall x (Paradisal(x) -> Budding(x))\n\nOffhand(viviana)\n\nOffhand(viviana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "Madona is unshod. Madona is cliched. Madona is airheaded. Maxwell is alleviated. Maxwell is unrivaled. Maxwell is airheaded. Enriqueta is unshod. Enriqueta is mushy. Enriqueta is cliched. Enriqueta is alleviated. Cynthia is unshod. Cynthia is cliched. Cynthia is alleviated. Cynthia is unrivaled. Cynthia is airheaded. All unshod people are unrivaled. Enriqueta is not airheaded.", "logic": "\nUnshod(madona)\nCliched(madona)\nAirheaded(madona)\nAlleviated(maxwell)\nUnrivaled(maxwell)\nAirheaded(maxwell)\nUnshod(enriqueta)\nMushy(enriqueta)\nCliched(enriqueta)\nAlleviated(enriqueta)\nUnshod(cynthia)\nCliched(cynthia)\nAlleviated(cynthia)\nUnrivaled(cynthia)\nAirheaded(cynthia)\nforall x (Unshod(x) -> Unrivaled(x))\n\nnot Airheaded(enriqueta)\n\nnot Airheaded(enriqueta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "Roxanna is neuroglial. Roxanna is laniary. Roxanna is nepali. Wynny is lost. Wynny is bossy. Wynny is nepali. Rosette is neuroglial. Rosette is semiformal. Rosette is laniary. Rosette is lost. Lowell is neuroglial. Lowell is laniary. Lowell is lost. Lowell is bossy. Lowell is nepali. All neuroglial people are bossy. Roxanna is semiformal.", "logic": "\nNeuroglial(roxanna)\nLaniary(roxanna)\nNepali(roxanna)\nLost(wynny)\nBossy(wynny)\nNepali(wynny)\nNeuroglial(rosette)\nSemiformal(rosette)\nLaniary(rosette)\nLost(rosette)\nNeuroglial(lowell)\nLaniary(lowell)\nLost(lowell)\nBossy(lowell)\nNepali(lowell)\nforall x (Neuroglial(x) -> Bossy(x))\n\nSemiformal(roxanna)\n\nSemiformal(roxanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1705"} {"premises": "The hall is reassured. The hall falcon the lanie. The hall acquit the esteban. The jonas is reassured. The jonas acquit the hall. The esteban derive the hall. The esteban is proclaimed. The esteban falcon the lanie. The esteban acquit the hall. The lanie derive the hall. The lanie falcon the esteban. The lanie acquit the jonas. If something is godless then it acquit the hall. If something is reassured and it derive the jonas then it is godless. The jonas is reassured.", "logic": "\nReassured(hall)\nFalcon(hall, lanie)\nAcquit(hall, esteban)\nReassured(jonas)\nAcquit(jonas, hall)\nDerive(esteban, hall)\nProclaimed(esteban)\nFalcon(esteban, lanie)\nAcquit(esteban, hall)\nDerive(lanie, hall)\nFalcon(lanie, esteban)\nAcquit(lanie, jonas)\nforall x (Godless(x) -> Acquit(x, hall))\nforall x (Reassured(x) and Derive(x, jonas) -> Godless(x))\n\nReassured(jonas)\n\ntherefore Reassured(jonas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3369"} {"premises": "The amalia is futile. The amalia unplug the tressa. The amalia thrash the felice. The dominica is futile. The dominica thrash the amalia. The felice gallop the amalia. The felice is plaintive. The felice unplug the tressa. The felice thrash the amalia. The tressa gallop the amalia. The tressa unplug the felice. The tressa thrash the dominica. If something is frangible then it thrash the amalia. If something is futile and it gallop the dominica then it is frangible. The tressa does not eat the amalia.", "logic": "\nFutile(amalia)\nUnplug(amalia, tressa)\nThrash(amalia, felice)\nFutile(dominica)\nThrash(dominica, amalia)\nGallop(felice, amalia)\nPlaintive(felice)\nUnplug(felice, tressa)\nThrash(felice, amalia)\nGallop(tressa, amalia)\nUnplug(tressa, felice)\nThrash(tressa, dominica)\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Thrash(x, amalia))\nforall x (Futile(x) and Gallop(x, dominica) -> Frangible(x))\n\nnot Gallop(tressa, amalia)\n\ntherefore Gallop(tressa, amalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3369"} {"premises": "The bianca is antifungal. The bianca mizzle the marya. The bianca lobby the kendall. The hakim is antifungal. The hakim lobby the bianca. The kendall redeploy the bianca. The kendall is balzacian. The kendall mizzle the marya. The kendall lobby the bianca. The marya redeploy the bianca. The marya mizzle the kendall. The marya lobby the hakim. If something is epidermic then it lobby the bianca. If something is antifungal and it redeploy the hakim then it is epidermic. The marya does not visit the bianca.", "logic": "\nAntifungal(bianca)\nMizzle(bianca, marya)\nLobby(bianca, kendall)\nAntifungal(hakim)\nLobby(hakim, bianca)\nRedeploy(kendall, bianca)\nBalzacian(kendall)\nMizzle(kendall, marya)\nLobby(kendall, bianca)\nRedeploy(marya, bianca)\nMizzle(marya, kendall)\nLobby(marya, hakim)\nforall x (Epidermic(x) -> Lobby(x, bianca))\nforall x (Antifungal(x) and Redeploy(x, hakim) -> Epidermic(x))\n\nnot Lobby(marya, bianca)\n\nforall x (Epidermic(x) -> Lobby(x, bianca)) <- forall x (Antifungal(x) and Redeploy(x, hakim) -> Epidermic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3369"} {"premises": "The henrik is cardinal. The henrik syllogise the sapphire. The henrik promise the lucina. The elysia is cardinal. The elysia promise the henrik. The lucina smash the henrik. The lucina is eukaryotic. The lucina syllogise the sapphire. The lucina promise the henrik. The sapphire smash the henrik. The sapphire syllogise the lucina. The sapphire promise the elysia. If something is dramatic then it promise the henrik. If something is cardinal and it smash the elysia then it is dramatic. The henrik smash the sapphire.", "logic": "\nCardinal(henrik)\nSyllogise(henrik, sapphire)\nPromise(henrik, lucina)\nCardinal(elysia)\nPromise(elysia, henrik)\nSmash(lucina, henrik)\nEukaryotic(lucina)\nSyllogise(lucina, sapphire)\nPromise(lucina, henrik)\nSmash(sapphire, henrik)\nSyllogise(sapphire, lucina)\nPromise(sapphire, elysia)\nforall x (Dramatic(x) -> Promise(x, henrik))\nforall x (Cardinal(x) and Smash(x, elysia) -> Dramatic(x))\n\nSmash(henrik, sapphire)\n\nSmash(henrik, sapphire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3369"} {"premises": "Dulcine is arguable. Dulcine is ungallant. Dulcine is viceregal. Dulcine is tetragonal. Elsey is arguable. Elsey is ungallant. Elsey is regardful. Augie is viceregal. Augie is javan. Augie is regardful. Roland is sterilized. Roland is ungallant. Roland is viceregal. Roland is javan. Roland is regardful. Roland is tetragonal. Rough, tetragonal people are sterilized. If someone is sterilized and regardful then they are arguable. Cold, arguable people are tetragonal. Cold, sterilized people are arguable. If someone is sterilized and arguable then they are viceregal. If Roland is sterilized and Roland is javan then Roland is tetragonal. Roland is tetragonal.", "logic": "\nArguable(dulcine)\nUngallant(dulcine)\nViceregal(dulcine)\nTetragonal(dulcine)\nArguable(elsey)\nUngallant(elsey)\nRegardful(elsey)\nViceregal(augie)\nJavan(augie)\nRegardful(augie)\nSterilized(roland)\nUngallant(roland)\nViceregal(roland)\nJavan(roland)\nRegardful(roland)\nTetragonal(roland)\nforall x (Regardful(x) and Tetragonal(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nforall x (Sterilized(x) and Regardful(x) -> Arguable(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Arguable(x) -> Tetragonal(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Sterilized(x) -> Arguable(x))\nforall x (Sterilized(x) and Arguable(x) -> Viceregal(x))\nSterilized(roland) and Javan(roland) -> Tetragonal(roland)\n\nTetragonal(roland)\n\ntherefore Tetragonal(roland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Danika is wizened. Danika is overfed. Danika is cardinal. Danika is endearing. Tomi is wizened. Tomi is overfed. Tomi is bighearted. Shaina is cardinal. Shaina is confucian. Shaina is bighearted. Dorette is live. Dorette is overfed. Dorette is cardinal. Dorette is confucian. Dorette is bighearted. Dorette is endearing. Rough, endearing people are live. If someone is live and bighearted then they are wizened. Cold, wizened people are endearing. Cold, live people are wizened. If someone is live and wizened then they are cardinal. If Dorette is live and Dorette is confucian then Dorette is endearing. Danika is not endearing.", "logic": "\nWizened(danika)\nOverfed(danika)\nCardinal(danika)\nEndearing(danika)\nWizened(tomi)\nOverfed(tomi)\nBighearted(tomi)\nCardinal(shaina)\nConfucian(shaina)\nBighearted(shaina)\nLive(dorette)\nOverfed(dorette)\nCardinal(dorette)\nConfucian(dorette)\nBighearted(dorette)\nEndearing(dorette)\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Endearing(x) -> Live(x))\nforall x (Live(x) and Bighearted(x) -> Wizened(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) and Wizened(x) -> Endearing(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) and Live(x) -> Wizened(x))\nforall x (Live(x) and Wizened(x) -> Cardinal(x))\nLive(dorette) and Confucian(dorette) -> Endearing(dorette)\n\nnot Endearing(danika)\n\ntherefore Endearing(danika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Shirleen is adsorptive. Shirleen is east. Shirleen is viewless. Shirleen is apologetic. Abbey is adsorptive. Abbey is east. Abbey is agonizing. Cherye is viewless. Cherye is alterable. Cherye is agonizing. Valerie is apopemptic. Valerie is east. Valerie is viewless. Valerie is alterable. Valerie is agonizing. Valerie is apologetic. Rough, apologetic people are apopemptic. If someone is apopemptic and agonizing then they are adsorptive. Cold, adsorptive people are apologetic. Cold, apopemptic people are adsorptive. If someone is apopemptic and adsorptive then they are viewless. If Valerie is apopemptic and Valerie is alterable then Valerie is apologetic. Abbey is apologetic.", "logic": "\nAdsorptive(shirleen)\nEast(shirleen)\nViewless(shirleen)\nApologetic(shirleen)\nAdsorptive(abbey)\nEast(abbey)\nAgonizing(abbey)\nViewless(cherye)\nAlterable(cherye)\nAgonizing(cherye)\nApopemptic(valerie)\nEast(valerie)\nViewless(valerie)\nAlterable(valerie)\nAgonizing(valerie)\nApologetic(valerie)\nforall x (Agonizing(x) and Apologetic(x) -> Apopemptic(x))\nforall x (Apopemptic(x) and Agonizing(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (East(x) and Adsorptive(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (East(x) and Apopemptic(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Apopemptic(x) and Adsorptive(x) -> Viewless(x))\nApopemptic(valerie) and Alterable(valerie) -> Apologetic(valerie)\n\nApologetic(abbey)\n\nEast(abbey) and Adsorptive(abbey) and forall x (East(x) and Adsorptive(x) -> Apologetic(x)) -> therefore Apologetic(abbey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Jeb is semiarid. Jeb is pleochroic. Jeb is amnestic. Jeb is unrevealed. Phillis is semiarid. Phillis is pleochroic. Phillis is satirical. Rebekkah is amnestic. Rebekkah is unladylike. Rebekkah is satirical. Lanny is deciding. Lanny is pleochroic. Lanny is amnestic. Lanny is unladylike. Lanny is satirical. Lanny is unrevealed. Rough, unrevealed people are deciding. If someone is deciding and satirical then they are semiarid. Cold, semiarid people are unrevealed. Cold, deciding people are semiarid. If someone is deciding and semiarid then they are amnestic. If Lanny is deciding and Lanny is unladylike then Lanny is unrevealed. Lanny is not semiarid.", "logic": "\nSemiarid(jeb)\nPleochroic(jeb)\nAmnestic(jeb)\nUnrevealed(jeb)\nSemiarid(phillis)\nPleochroic(phillis)\nSatirical(phillis)\nAmnestic(rebekkah)\nUnladylike(rebekkah)\nSatirical(rebekkah)\nDeciding(lanny)\nPleochroic(lanny)\nAmnestic(lanny)\nUnladylike(lanny)\nSatirical(lanny)\nUnrevealed(lanny)\nforall x (Satirical(x) and Unrevealed(x) -> Deciding(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Satirical(x) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Semiarid(x) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Pleochroic(x) and Deciding(x) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Deciding(x) and Semiarid(x) -> Amnestic(x))\nDeciding(lanny) and Unladylike(lanny) -> Unrevealed(lanny)\n\nnot Semiarid(lanny)\n\nDeciding(lanny) and Satirical(lanny) and forall x (Deciding(x) and Satirical(x) -> Semiarid(x)) -> therefore Semiarid(lanny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Herculie is kinglike. Herculie is adonic. Herculie is wandering. Herculie is yankee. Marianne is kinglike. Marianne is adonic. Marianne is chemical. Rayner is wandering. Rayner is seraphical. Rayner is chemical. Lana is couthie. Lana is adonic. Lana is wandering. Lana is seraphical. Lana is chemical. Lana is yankee. Rough, yankee people are couthie. If someone is couthie and chemical then they are kinglike. Cold, kinglike people are yankee. Cold, couthie people are kinglike. If someone is couthie and kinglike then they are wandering. If Lana is couthie and Lana is seraphical then Lana is yankee. Marianne is couthie.", "logic": "\nKinglike(herculie)\nAdonic(herculie)\nWandering(herculie)\nYankee(herculie)\nKinglike(marianne)\nAdonic(marianne)\nChemical(marianne)\nWandering(rayner)\nSeraphical(rayner)\nChemical(rayner)\nCouthie(lana)\nAdonic(lana)\nWandering(lana)\nSeraphical(lana)\nChemical(lana)\nYankee(lana)\nforall x (Chemical(x) and Yankee(x) -> Couthie(x))\nforall x (Couthie(x) and Chemical(x) -> Kinglike(x))\nforall x (Adonic(x) and Kinglike(x) -> Yankee(x))\nforall x (Adonic(x) and Couthie(x) -> Kinglike(x))\nforall x (Couthie(x) and Kinglike(x) -> Wandering(x))\nCouthie(lana) and Seraphical(lana) -> Yankee(lana)\n\nCouthie(marianne)\n\nAdonic(marianne) and Kinglike(marianne) and forall x (Adonic(x) and Kinglike(x) -> Yankee(x)) -> therefore Yankee(marianne) Chemical(marianne) and Yankee(marianne) and forall x (Chemical(x) and Yankee(x) -> Couthie(x)) -> therefore Couthie(marianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Sim is crinkled. Sim is helmeted. Sim is flavorous. Sim is decimal. Jeb is crinkled. Jeb is helmeted. Jeb is fickle. Florrie is flavorous. Florrie is epicarpal. Florrie is fickle. Shorty is upwind. Shorty is helmeted. Shorty is flavorous. Shorty is epicarpal. Shorty is fickle. Shorty is decimal. Rough, decimal people are upwind. If someone is upwind and fickle then they are crinkled. Cold, crinkled people are decimal. Cold, upwind people are crinkled. If someone is upwind and crinkled then they are flavorous. If Shorty is upwind and Shorty is epicarpal then Shorty is decimal. Jeb is not upwind.", "logic": "\nCrinkled(sim)\nHelmeted(sim)\nFlavorous(sim)\nDecimal(sim)\nCrinkled(jeb)\nHelmeted(jeb)\nFickle(jeb)\nFlavorous(florrie)\nEpicarpal(florrie)\nFickle(florrie)\nUpwind(shorty)\nHelmeted(shorty)\nFlavorous(shorty)\nEpicarpal(shorty)\nFickle(shorty)\nDecimal(shorty)\nforall x (Fickle(x) and Decimal(x) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Upwind(x) and Fickle(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Helmeted(x) and Crinkled(x) -> Decimal(x))\nforall x (Helmeted(x) and Upwind(x) -> Crinkled(x))\nforall x (Upwind(x) and Crinkled(x) -> Flavorous(x))\nUpwind(shorty) and Epicarpal(shorty) -> Decimal(shorty)\n\nnot Upwind(jeb)\n\nHelmeted(jeb) and Crinkled(jeb) and forall x (Helmeted(x) and Crinkled(x) -> Decimal(x)) -> therefore Decimal(jeb) Fickle(jeb) and Decimal(jeb) and forall x (Fickle(x) and Decimal(x) -> Upwind(x)) -> therefore Upwind(jeb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Rodd is epenthetic. Rodd is muhammadan. Rodd is presumable. Rodd is gluttonous. Myrta is epenthetic. Myrta is muhammadan. Myrta is expressed. Tamarah is presumable. Tamarah is webby. Tamarah is expressed. Donielle is overactive. Donielle is muhammadan. Donielle is presumable. Donielle is webby. Donielle is expressed. Donielle is gluttonous. Rough, gluttonous people are overactive. If someone is overactive and expressed then they are epenthetic. Cold, epenthetic people are gluttonous. Cold, overactive people are epenthetic. If someone is overactive and epenthetic then they are presumable. If Donielle is overactive and Donielle is webby then Donielle is gluttonous. Myrta is presumable.", "logic": "\nEpenthetic(rodd)\nMuhammadan(rodd)\nPresumable(rodd)\nGluttonous(rodd)\nEpenthetic(myrta)\nMuhammadan(myrta)\nExpressed(myrta)\nPresumable(tamarah)\nWebby(tamarah)\nExpressed(tamarah)\nOveractive(donielle)\nMuhammadan(donielle)\nPresumable(donielle)\nWebby(donielle)\nExpressed(donielle)\nGluttonous(donielle)\nforall x (Expressed(x) and Gluttonous(x) -> Overactive(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Expressed(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) and Epenthetic(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) and Overactive(x) -> Epenthetic(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Epenthetic(x) -> Presumable(x))\nOveractive(donielle) and Webby(donielle) -> Gluttonous(donielle)\n\nPresumable(myrta)\n\nMuhammadan(myrta) and Epenthetic(myrta) and forall x (Muhammadan(x) and Epenthetic(x) -> Gluttonous(x)) -> therefore Gluttonous(myrta) Expressed(myrta) and Gluttonous(myrta) and forall x (Expressed(x) and Gluttonous(x) -> Overactive(x)) -> therefore Overactive(myrta) Overactive(myrta) and Epenthetic(myrta) and forall x (Overactive(x) and Epenthetic(x) -> Presumable(x)) -> therefore Presumable(myrta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Durant is drinkable. Durant is toiling. Durant is primed. Durant is unmanly. Deana is drinkable. Deana is toiling. Deana is tokenish. Prue is primed. Prue is unscathed. Prue is tokenish. Ciara is hierarchic. Ciara is toiling. Ciara is primed. Ciara is unscathed. Ciara is tokenish. Ciara is unmanly. Rough, unmanly people are hierarchic. If someone is hierarchic and tokenish then they are drinkable. Cold, drinkable people are unmanly. Cold, hierarchic people are drinkable. If someone is hierarchic and drinkable then they are primed. If Ciara is hierarchic and Ciara is unscathed then Ciara is unmanly. Deana is not primed.", "logic": "\nDrinkable(durant)\nToiling(durant)\nPrimed(durant)\nUnmanly(durant)\nDrinkable(deana)\nToiling(deana)\nTokenish(deana)\nPrimed(prue)\nUnscathed(prue)\nTokenish(prue)\nHierarchic(ciara)\nToiling(ciara)\nPrimed(ciara)\nUnscathed(ciara)\nTokenish(ciara)\nUnmanly(ciara)\nforall x (Tokenish(x) and Unmanly(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Tokenish(x) -> Drinkable(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Drinkable(x) -> Unmanly(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Hierarchic(x) -> Drinkable(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Drinkable(x) -> Primed(x))\nHierarchic(ciara) and Unscathed(ciara) -> Unmanly(ciara)\n\nnot Primed(deana)\n\nToiling(deana) and Drinkable(deana) and forall x (Toiling(x) and Drinkable(x) -> Unmanly(x)) -> therefore Unmanly(deana) Tokenish(deana) and Unmanly(deana) and forall x (Tokenish(x) and Unmanly(x) -> Hierarchic(x)) -> therefore Hierarchic(deana) Hierarchic(deana) and Drinkable(deana) and forall x (Hierarchic(x) and Drinkable(x) -> Primed(x)) -> therefore Primed(deana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Von is provincial. Von is subject. Von is mycenaean. Von is anisogamic. Annelise is provincial. Annelise is subject. Annelise is hypnogogic. Tove is mycenaean. Tove is gormless. Tove is hypnogogic. Valdemar is readable. Valdemar is subject. Valdemar is mycenaean. Valdemar is gormless. Valdemar is hypnogogic. Valdemar is anisogamic. Rough, anisogamic people are readable. If someone is readable and hypnogogic then they are provincial. Cold, provincial people are anisogamic. Cold, readable people are provincial. If someone is readable and provincial then they are mycenaean. If Valdemar is readable and Valdemar is gormless then Valdemar is anisogamic. Von is not readable.", "logic": "\nProvincial(von)\nSubject(von)\nMycenaean(von)\nAnisogamic(von)\nProvincial(annelise)\nSubject(annelise)\nHypnogogic(annelise)\nMycenaean(tove)\nGormless(tove)\nHypnogogic(tove)\nReadable(valdemar)\nSubject(valdemar)\nMycenaean(valdemar)\nGormless(valdemar)\nHypnogogic(valdemar)\nAnisogamic(valdemar)\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Anisogamic(x) -> Readable(x))\nforall x (Readable(x) and Hypnogogic(x) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) and Provincial(x) -> Anisogamic(x))\nforall x (Subject(x) and Readable(x) -> Provincial(x))\nforall x (Readable(x) and Provincial(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nReadable(valdemar) and Gormless(valdemar) -> Anisogamic(valdemar)\n\nnot Readable(von)\n\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) and Anisogamic(x) -> Readable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Tamarah is gluey. Tamarah is cxxv. Tamarah is tumescent. Tamarah is aurous. Janeva is gluey. Janeva is cxxv. Janeva is thalloid. Vikki is tumescent. Vikki is bland. Vikki is thalloid. Nathalia is tympanic. Nathalia is cxxv. Nathalia is tumescent. Nathalia is bland. Nathalia is thalloid. Nathalia is aurous. Rough, aurous people are tympanic. If someone is tympanic and thalloid then they are gluey. Cold, gluey people are aurous. Cold, tympanic people are gluey. If someone is tympanic and gluey then they are tumescent. If Nathalia is tympanic and Nathalia is bland then Nathalia is aurous. Vikki is tympanic.", "logic": "\nGluey(tamarah)\nCxxv(tamarah)\nTumescent(tamarah)\nAurous(tamarah)\nGluey(janeva)\nCxxv(janeva)\nThalloid(janeva)\nTumescent(vikki)\nBland(vikki)\nThalloid(vikki)\nTympanic(nathalia)\nCxxv(nathalia)\nTumescent(nathalia)\nBland(nathalia)\nThalloid(nathalia)\nAurous(nathalia)\nforall x (Thalloid(x) and Aurous(x) -> Tympanic(x))\nforall x (Tympanic(x) and Thalloid(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) and Gluey(x) -> Aurous(x))\nforall x (Cxxv(x) and Tympanic(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Tympanic(x) and Gluey(x) -> Tumescent(x))\nTympanic(nathalia) and Bland(nathalia) -> Aurous(nathalia)\n\nTympanic(vikki)\n\nforall x (Thalloid(x) and Aurous(x) -> Tympanic(x)) <- forall x (Cxxv(x) and Gluey(x) -> Aurous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Adina is acidulent. Adina is modular. Adina is suicidal. Adina is harmless. Shela is acidulent. Shela is modular. Shela is weekly. Fancie is suicidal. Fancie is teensy. Fancie is weekly. Lynnett is inbound. Lynnett is modular. Lynnett is suicidal. Lynnett is teensy. Lynnett is weekly. Lynnett is harmless. Rough, harmless people are inbound. If someone is inbound and weekly then they are acidulent. Cold, acidulent people are harmless. Cold, inbound people are acidulent. If someone is inbound and acidulent then they are suicidal. If Lynnett is inbound and Lynnett is teensy then Lynnett is harmless. Fancie is not harmless.", "logic": "\nAcidulent(adina)\nModular(adina)\nSuicidal(adina)\nHarmless(adina)\nAcidulent(shela)\nModular(shela)\nWeekly(shela)\nSuicidal(fancie)\nTeensy(fancie)\nWeekly(fancie)\nInbound(lynnett)\nModular(lynnett)\nSuicidal(lynnett)\nTeensy(lynnett)\nWeekly(lynnett)\nHarmless(lynnett)\nforall x (Weekly(x) and Harmless(x) -> Inbound(x))\nforall x (Inbound(x) and Weekly(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Modular(x) and Acidulent(x) -> Harmless(x))\nforall x (Modular(x) and Inbound(x) -> Acidulent(x))\nforall x (Inbound(x) and Acidulent(x) -> Suicidal(x))\nInbound(lynnett) and Teensy(lynnett) -> Harmless(lynnett)\n\nnot Harmless(fancie)\n\nforall x (Modular(x) and Acidulent(x) -> Harmless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Sayers is tutelary. Sayers is acidulous. Sayers is sphingine. Sayers is roofless. Flory is tutelary. Flory is acidulous. Flory is divergent. Katheleen is sphingine. Katheleen is bosky. Katheleen is divergent. Eleanor is grotesque. Eleanor is acidulous. Eleanor is sphingine. Eleanor is bosky. Eleanor is divergent. Eleanor is roofless. Rough, roofless people are grotesque. If someone is grotesque and divergent then they are tutelary. Cold, tutelary people are roofless. Cold, grotesque people are tutelary. If someone is grotesque and tutelary then they are sphingine. If Eleanor is grotesque and Eleanor is bosky then Eleanor is roofless. Katheleen is tutelary.", "logic": "\nTutelary(sayers)\nAcidulous(sayers)\nSphingine(sayers)\nRoofless(sayers)\nTutelary(flory)\nAcidulous(flory)\nDivergent(flory)\nSphingine(katheleen)\nBosky(katheleen)\nDivergent(katheleen)\nGrotesque(eleanor)\nAcidulous(eleanor)\nSphingine(eleanor)\nBosky(eleanor)\nDivergent(eleanor)\nRoofless(eleanor)\nforall x (Divergent(x) and Roofless(x) -> Grotesque(x))\nforall x (Grotesque(x) and Divergent(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Acidulous(x) and Tutelary(x) -> Roofless(x))\nforall x (Acidulous(x) and Grotesque(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Grotesque(x) and Tutelary(x) -> Sphingine(x))\nGrotesque(eleanor) and Bosky(eleanor) -> Roofless(eleanor)\n\nTutelary(katheleen)\n\nforall x (Grotesque(x) and Divergent(x) -> Tutelary(x)) <- forall x (Divergent(x) and Roofless(x) -> Grotesque(x)) <- forall x (Acidulous(x) and Tutelary(x) -> Roofless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Aldus is serene. Aldus is eyelike. Aldus is amygdaloid. Aldus is melodic. Lynnell is serene. Lynnell is eyelike. Lynnell is stealthy. Dulcine is amygdaloid. Dulcine is dominant. Dulcine is stealthy. Gunner is overland. Gunner is eyelike. Gunner is amygdaloid. Gunner is dominant. Gunner is stealthy. Gunner is melodic. Rough, melodic people are overland. If someone is overland and stealthy then they are serene. Cold, serene people are melodic. Cold, overland people are serene. If someone is overland and serene then they are amygdaloid. If Gunner is overland and Gunner is dominant then Gunner is melodic. Aldus is not dominant.", "logic": "\nSerene(aldus)\nEyelike(aldus)\nAmygdaloid(aldus)\nMelodic(aldus)\nSerene(lynnell)\nEyelike(lynnell)\nStealthy(lynnell)\nAmygdaloid(dulcine)\nDominant(dulcine)\nStealthy(dulcine)\nOverland(gunner)\nEyelike(gunner)\nAmygdaloid(gunner)\nDominant(gunner)\nStealthy(gunner)\nMelodic(gunner)\nforall x (Stealthy(x) and Melodic(x) -> Overland(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and Stealthy(x) -> Serene(x))\nforall x (Eyelike(x) and Serene(x) -> Melodic(x))\nforall x (Eyelike(x) and Overland(x) -> Serene(x))\nforall x (Overland(x) and Serene(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\nOverland(gunner) and Dominant(gunner) -> Melodic(gunner)\n\nnot Dominant(aldus)\n\nnot Dominant(aldus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Ronnie is vasiform. Ronnie is modest. Ronnie is algoid. Ronnie is abscessed. Eulalie is vasiform. Eulalie is modest. Eulalie is apothecial. Torrie is algoid. Torrie is skyward. Torrie is apothecial. Renault is unmoving. Renault is modest. Renault is algoid. Renault is skyward. Renault is apothecial. Renault is abscessed. Rough, abscessed people are unmoving. If someone is unmoving and apothecial then they are vasiform. Cold, vasiform people are abscessed. Cold, unmoving people are vasiform. If someone is unmoving and vasiform then they are algoid. If Renault is unmoving and Renault is skyward then Renault is abscessed. Torrie is modest.", "logic": "\nVasiform(ronnie)\nModest(ronnie)\nAlgoid(ronnie)\nAbscessed(ronnie)\nVasiform(eulalie)\nModest(eulalie)\nApothecial(eulalie)\nAlgoid(torrie)\nSkyward(torrie)\nApothecial(torrie)\nUnmoving(renault)\nModest(renault)\nAlgoid(renault)\nSkyward(renault)\nApothecial(renault)\nAbscessed(renault)\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Abscessed(x) -> Unmoving(x))\nforall x (Unmoving(x) and Apothecial(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Modest(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Modest(x) and Unmoving(x) -> Vasiform(x))\nforall x (Unmoving(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Algoid(x))\nUnmoving(renault) and Skyward(renault) -> Abscessed(renault)\n\nModest(torrie)\n\nModest(torrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Nicolas is motivating. Nicolas is inpouring. Nicolas is waterborne. Nicolas is acquainted. Ella is motivating. Ella is inpouring. Ella is frank. Roman is waterborne. Roman is patched. Roman is frank. Dyanne is anosmatic. Dyanne is inpouring. Dyanne is waterborne. Dyanne is patched. Dyanne is frank. Dyanne is acquainted. Rough, acquainted people are anosmatic. If someone is anosmatic and frank then they are motivating. Cold, motivating people are acquainted. Cold, anosmatic people are motivating. If someone is anosmatic and motivating then they are waterborne. If Dyanne is anosmatic and Dyanne is patched then Dyanne is acquainted. Ella is not patched.", "logic": "\nMotivating(nicolas)\nInpouring(nicolas)\nWaterborne(nicolas)\nAcquainted(nicolas)\nMotivating(ella)\nInpouring(ella)\nFrank(ella)\nWaterborne(roman)\nPatched(roman)\nFrank(roman)\nAnosmatic(dyanne)\nInpouring(dyanne)\nWaterborne(dyanne)\nPatched(dyanne)\nFrank(dyanne)\nAcquainted(dyanne)\nforall x (Frank(x) and Acquainted(x) -> Anosmatic(x))\nforall x (Anosmatic(x) and Frank(x) -> Motivating(x))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) and Motivating(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Inpouring(x) and Anosmatic(x) -> Motivating(x))\nforall x (Anosmatic(x) and Motivating(x) -> Waterborne(x))\nAnosmatic(dyanne) and Patched(dyanne) -> Acquainted(dyanne)\n\nnot Patched(ella)\n\nnot Patched(ella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Anson is riskless. Anson is saxicolous. Anson is mannered. Anson is banal. Marylou is riskless. Marylou is saxicolous. Marylou is corrupted. Lesli is mannered. Lesli is hitlerian. Lesli is corrupted. Sidoney is divided. Sidoney is saxicolous. Sidoney is mannered. Sidoney is hitlerian. Sidoney is corrupted. Sidoney is banal. Rough, banal people are divided. If someone is divided and corrupted then they are riskless. Cold, riskless people are banal. Cold, divided people are riskless. If someone is divided and riskless then they are mannered. If Sidoney is divided and Sidoney is hitlerian then Sidoney is banal. Anson is corrupted.", "logic": "\nRiskless(anson)\nSaxicolous(anson)\nMannered(anson)\nBanal(anson)\nRiskless(marylou)\nSaxicolous(marylou)\nCorrupted(marylou)\nMannered(lesli)\nHitlerian(lesli)\nCorrupted(lesli)\nDivided(sidoney)\nSaxicolous(sidoney)\nMannered(sidoney)\nHitlerian(sidoney)\nCorrupted(sidoney)\nBanal(sidoney)\nforall x (Corrupted(x) and Banal(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Corrupted(x) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Riskless(x) -> Banal(x))\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Divided(x) -> Riskless(x))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Riskless(x) -> Mannered(x))\nDivided(sidoney) and Hitlerian(sidoney) -> Banal(sidoney)\n\nCorrupted(anson)\n\nCorrupted(anson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1018"} {"premises": "Hassan is urbanised. Leone is analyzable. Garrett is thrombosed. Rickard is wormy. Smart things are wormy. If something is wormy then it is analyzable. All thrombosed things are urbanised. Rickard is wormy.", "logic": "\nUrbanised(hassan)\nAnalyzable(leone)\nThrombosed(garrett)\nWormy(rickard)\nforall x (Urbanised(x) -> Wormy(x))\nforall x (Wormy(x) -> Analyzable(x))\nforall x (Thrombosed(x) -> Urbanised(x))\n\nWormy(rickard)\n\ntherefore Wormy(rickard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Tamar is stockinged. Trescha is unethical. Hart is tangy. Casie is expansive. Smart things are expansive. If something is expansive then it is unethical. All tangy things are stockinged. Trescha is not unethical.", "logic": "\nStockinged(tamar)\nUnethical(trescha)\nTangy(hart)\nExpansive(casie)\nforall x (Stockinged(x) -> Expansive(x))\nforall x (Expansive(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Tangy(x) -> Stockinged(x))\n\nnot Unethical(trescha)\n\ntherefore Unethical(trescha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Sofia is stalemated. Lorenzo is foliaceous. Giordano is iodinating. Edythe is surplus. Smart things are surplus. If something is surplus then it is foliaceous. All iodinating things are stalemated. Sofia is surplus.", "logic": "\nStalemated(sofia)\nFoliaceous(lorenzo)\nIodinating(giordano)\nSurplus(edythe)\nforall x (Stalemated(x) -> Surplus(x))\nforall x (Surplus(x) -> Foliaceous(x))\nforall x (Iodinating(x) -> Stalemated(x))\n\nSurplus(sofia)\n\nStalemated(sofia) and forall x (Stalemated(x) -> Surplus(x)) -> therefore Surplus(sofia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Auguste is essene. Inigo is fungal. Ulric is capillary. Aubry is podlike. Smart things are podlike. If something is podlike then it is fungal. All capillary things are essene. Aubry is not fungal.", "logic": "\nEssene(auguste)\nFungal(inigo)\nCapillary(ulric)\nPodlike(aubry)\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Podlike(x))\nforall x (Podlike(x) -> Fungal(x))\nforall x (Capillary(x) -> Essene(x))\n\nnot Fungal(aubry)\n\nPodlike(aubry) and forall x (Podlike(x) -> Fungal(x)) -> therefore Fungal(aubry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Cornellis is beltlike. Buffy is hoofed. Caril is malthusian. Milka is diaphysial. Smart things are diaphysial. If something is diaphysial then it is hoofed. All malthusian things are beltlike. Cornellis is hoofed.", "logic": "\nBeltlike(cornellis)\nHoofed(buffy)\nMalthusian(caril)\nDiaphysial(milka)\nforall x (Beltlike(x) -> Diaphysial(x))\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) -> Hoofed(x))\nforall x (Malthusian(x) -> Beltlike(x))\n\nHoofed(cornellis)\n\nBeltlike(cornellis) and forall x (Beltlike(x) -> Diaphysial(x)) -> therefore Diaphysial(cornellis) Diaphysial(cornellis) and forall x (Diaphysial(x) -> Hoofed(x)) -> therefore Hoofed(cornellis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Whitby is maniacal. Redford is concordant. Jojo is native. Adrian is lviii. Smart things are lviii. If something is lviii then it is concordant. All native things are maniacal. Jojo is not lviii.", "logic": "\nManiacal(whitby)\nConcordant(redford)\nNative(jojo)\nLviii(adrian)\nforall x (Maniacal(x) -> Lviii(x))\nforall x (Lviii(x) -> Concordant(x))\nforall x (Native(x) -> Maniacal(x))\n\nnot Lviii(jojo)\n\nNative(jojo) and forall x (Native(x) -> Maniacal(x)) -> therefore Maniacal(jojo) Maniacal(jojo) and forall x (Maniacal(x) -> Lviii(x)) -> therefore Lviii(jojo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Parsifal is inadequate. Orelee is thievish. Mikel is central. Bernadina is cabalistic. Smart things are cabalistic. If something is cabalistic then it is thievish. All central things are inadequate. Mikel is thievish.", "logic": "\nInadequate(parsifal)\nThievish(orelee)\nCentral(mikel)\nCabalistic(bernadina)\nforall x (Inadequate(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Central(x) -> Inadequate(x))\n\nThievish(mikel)\n\nCentral(mikel) and forall x (Central(x) -> Inadequate(x)) -> therefore Inadequate(mikel) Inadequate(mikel) and forall x (Inadequate(x) -> Cabalistic(x)) -> therefore Cabalistic(mikel) Cabalistic(mikel) and forall x (Cabalistic(x) -> Thievish(x)) -> therefore Thievish(mikel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Skipp is smoggy. Annora is ingenuous. Rosette is uncleared. Zaneta is sinitic. Smart things are sinitic. If something is sinitic then it is ingenuous. All uncleared things are smoggy. Rosette is not ingenuous.", "logic": "\nSmoggy(skipp)\nIngenuous(annora)\nUncleared(rosette)\nSinitic(zaneta)\nforall x (Smoggy(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Ingenuous(x))\nforall x (Uncleared(x) -> Smoggy(x))\n\nnot Ingenuous(rosette)\n\nUncleared(rosette) and forall x (Uncleared(x) -> Smoggy(x)) -> therefore Smoggy(rosette) Smoggy(rosette) and forall x (Smoggy(x) -> Sinitic(x)) -> therefore Sinitic(rosette) Sinitic(rosette) and forall x (Sinitic(x) -> Ingenuous(x)) -> therefore Ingenuous(rosette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Lynea is nauseous. Vida is cognisable. Hermione is premedical. Elysha is bedraggled. Smart things are bedraggled. If something is bedraggled then it is cognisable. All premedical things are nauseous. Elysha is not nauseous.", "logic": "\nNauseous(lynea)\nCognisable(vida)\nPremedical(hermione)\nBedraggled(elysha)\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) -> Cognisable(x))\nforall x (Premedical(x) -> Nauseous(x))\n\nnot Nauseous(elysha)\n\nforall x (Premedical(x) -> Nauseous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Dionne is chestnut. Daren is authorial. Bearnard is amoeban. Kareem is thriftless. Smart things are thriftless. If something is thriftless then it is authorial. All amoeban things are chestnut. Daren is thriftless.", "logic": "\nChestnut(dionne)\nAuthorial(daren)\nAmoeban(bearnard)\nThriftless(kareem)\nforall x (Chestnut(x) -> Thriftless(x))\nforall x (Thriftless(x) -> Authorial(x))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) -> Chestnut(x))\n\nThriftless(daren)\n\nforall x (Chestnut(x) -> Thriftless(x)) <- forall x (Amoeban(x) -> Chestnut(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Davis is valved. Regina is membered. Tre is vertical. Nertie is nonechoic. Smart things are nonechoic. If something is nonechoic then it is membered. All vertical things are valved. Regina is not valved.", "logic": "\nValved(davis)\nMembered(regina)\nVertical(tre)\nNonechoic(nertie)\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Nonechoic(x) -> Membered(x))\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Valved(x))\n\nnot Valved(regina)\n\nforall x (Vertical(x) -> Valved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Quigman is sclerosed. Ahmed is summative. Alicia is porous. Hermia is undershot. Smart things are undershot. If something is undershot then it is summative. All porous things are sclerosed. Quigman is porous.", "logic": "\nSclerosed(quigman)\nSummative(ahmed)\nPorous(alicia)\nUndershot(hermia)\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) -> Undershot(x))\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> Summative(x))\nforall x (Porous(x) -> Sclerosed(x))\n\nPorous(quigman)\n\nPorous(quigman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Ivan is manichaean. Belia is equestrian. Issi is thenar. Mariam is markovian. Smart things are markovian. If something is markovian then it is equestrian. All thenar things are manichaean. Mariam is not red.", "logic": "\nManichaean(ivan)\nEquestrian(belia)\nThenar(issi)\nMarkovian(mariam)\nforall x (Manichaean(x) -> Markovian(x))\nforall x (Markovian(x) -> Equestrian(x))\nforall x (Thenar(x) -> Manichaean(x))\n\nnot Red(mariam)\n\nnot Red(mariam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Kaylyn is aggregated. Flemming is uncounted. Haley is gallic. Tallia is cuspated. Smart things are cuspated. If something is cuspated then it is uncounted. All gallic things are aggregated. Tallia is nice.", "logic": "\nAggregated(kaylyn)\nUncounted(flemming)\nGallic(haley)\nCuspated(tallia)\nforall x (Aggregated(x) -> Cuspated(x))\nforall x (Cuspated(x) -> Uncounted(x))\nforall x (Gallic(x) -> Aggregated(x))\n\nNice(tallia)\n\nNice(tallia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Martynne is racking. Neilla is deaf. Shelley is sinning. Adolphe is amphoric. Smart things are amphoric. If something is amphoric then it is deaf. All sinning things are racking. Martynne is not red.", "logic": "\nRacking(martynne)\nDeaf(neilla)\nSinning(shelley)\nAmphoric(adolphe)\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Amphoric(x))\nforall x (Amphoric(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Sinning(x) -> Racking(x))\n\nnot Red(martynne)\n\nnot Red(martynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Beryl is coagulate. Ania is diluvial. Stafani is dyslexic. Locke is hematal. Smart things are hematal. If something is hematal then it is diluvial. All dyslexic things are coagulate. Stafani is nice.", "logic": "\nCoagulate(beryl)\nDiluvial(ania)\nDyslexic(stafani)\nHematal(locke)\nforall x (Coagulate(x) -> Hematal(x))\nforall x (Hematal(x) -> Diluvial(x))\nforall x (Dyslexic(x) -> Coagulate(x))\n\nNice(stafani)\n\nNice(stafani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1331"} {"premises": "Demetre is equitable. Demetre is not shrinkable. Dino is not equitable. Dino is parvenu. Dino is not shrinkable. Dino is evasive. Muffin is not shrinkable. Chandler is equitable. Chandler is not icky. Chandler is parvenu. Chandler is shrinkable. Chandler is feckless. If Muffin is equitable and Muffin is papillose then Muffin is feckless. All equitable, feckless people are evasive. If someone is feckless and equitable then they are evasive. All equitable people are parvenu. Round, shrinkable people are feckless. All parvenu people are feckless. Dino is not equitable.", "logic": "\nEquitable(demetre)\nnot Shrinkable(demetre)\nnot Equitable(dino)\nParvenu(dino)\nnot Shrinkable(dino)\nEvasive(dino)\nnot Shrinkable(muffin)\nEquitable(chandler)\nnot Icky(chandler)\nParvenu(chandler)\nShrinkable(chandler)\nFeckless(chandler)\nEquitable(muffin) and Papillose(muffin) -> Feckless(muffin)\nforall x (Equitable(x) and Feckless(x) -> Evasive(x))\nforall x (Feckless(x) and Equitable(x) -> Evasive(x))\nforall x (Equitable(x) -> Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and Shrinkable(x) -> Feckless(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) -> Feckless(x))\n\nnot Equitable(dino)\n\ntherefore not Equitable(dino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Lacie is valvular. Lacie is not lxxi. Don is not valvular. Don is musical. Don is not lxxi. Don is engrossed. Fredrika is not lxxi. Janey is valvular. Janey is not oleophobic. Janey is musical. Janey is lxxi. Janey is bistred. If Fredrika is valvular and Fredrika is unwavering then Fredrika is bistred. All valvular, bistred people are engrossed. If someone is bistred and valvular then they are engrossed. All valvular people are musical. Round, lxxi people are bistred. All musical people are bistred. Don is valvular.", "logic": "\nValvular(lacie)\nnot Lxxi(lacie)\nnot Valvular(don)\nMusical(don)\nnot Lxxi(don)\nEngrossed(don)\nnot Lxxi(fredrika)\nValvular(janey)\nnot Oleophobic(janey)\nMusical(janey)\nLxxi(janey)\nBistred(janey)\nValvular(fredrika) and Unwavering(fredrika) -> Bistred(fredrika)\nforall x (Valvular(x) and Bistred(x) -> Engrossed(x))\nforall x (Bistred(x) and Valvular(x) -> Engrossed(x))\nforall x (Valvular(x) -> Musical(x))\nforall x (Musical(x) and Lxxi(x) -> Bistred(x))\nforall x (Musical(x) -> Bistred(x))\n\nValvular(don)\n\ntherefore not Valvular(don)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Ellsworth is square. Ellsworth is not bourgeois. Solly is not square. Solly is wagnerian. Solly is not bourgeois. Solly is signed. Rosy is not bourgeois. Lurleen is square. Lurleen is not serried. Lurleen is wagnerian. Lurleen is bourgeois. Lurleen is excursive. If Rosy is square and Rosy is yellowish then Rosy is excursive. All square, excursive people are signed. If someone is excursive and square then they are signed. All square people are wagnerian. Round, bourgeois people are excursive. All wagnerian people are excursive. Solly is excursive.", "logic": "\nSquare(ellsworth)\nnot Bourgeois(ellsworth)\nnot Square(solly)\nWagnerian(solly)\nnot Bourgeois(solly)\nSigned(solly)\nnot Bourgeois(rosy)\nSquare(lurleen)\nnot Serried(lurleen)\nWagnerian(lurleen)\nBourgeois(lurleen)\nExcursive(lurleen)\nSquare(rosy) and Yellowish(rosy) -> Excursive(rosy)\nforall x (Square(x) and Excursive(x) -> Signed(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) and Square(x) -> Signed(x))\nforall x (Square(x) -> Wagnerian(x))\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) and Bourgeois(x) -> Excursive(x))\nforall x (Wagnerian(x) -> Excursive(x))\n\nExcursive(solly)\n\nWagnerian(solly) and forall x (Wagnerian(x) -> Excursive(x)) -> therefore Excursive(solly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Carrol is wireless. Carrol is not vicinal. Renaldo is not wireless. Renaldo is flammable. Renaldo is not vicinal. Renaldo is reviving. Felisha is not vicinal. Bennett is wireless. Bennett is not awol. Bennett is flammable. Bennett is vicinal. Bennett is corrigible. If Felisha is wireless and Felisha is dizygotic then Felisha is corrigible. All wireless, corrigible people are reviving. If someone is corrigible and wireless then they are reviving. All wireless people are flammable. Round, vicinal people are corrigible. All flammable people are corrigible. Carrol is not flammable.", "logic": "\nWireless(carrol)\nnot Vicinal(carrol)\nnot Wireless(renaldo)\nFlammable(renaldo)\nnot Vicinal(renaldo)\nReviving(renaldo)\nnot Vicinal(felisha)\nWireless(bennett)\nnot Awol(bennett)\nFlammable(bennett)\nVicinal(bennett)\nCorrigible(bennett)\nWireless(felisha) and Dizygotic(felisha) -> Corrigible(felisha)\nforall x (Wireless(x) and Corrigible(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Corrigible(x) and Wireless(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Flammable(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) and Vicinal(x) -> Corrigible(x))\nforall x (Flammable(x) -> Corrigible(x))\n\nnot Flammable(carrol)\n\nWireless(carrol) and forall x (Wireless(x) -> Flammable(x)) -> therefore Flammable(carrol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Brock is lubricious. Brock is not convex. Alwin is not lubricious. Alwin is inertial. Alwin is not convex. Alwin is hypnotized. Theresina is not convex. Riannon is lubricious. Riannon is not aphetic. Riannon is inertial. Riannon is convex. Riannon is bootless. If Theresina is lubricious and Theresina is sandlike then Theresina is bootless. All lubricious, bootless people are hypnotized. If someone is bootless and lubricious then they are hypnotized. All lubricious people are inertial. Round, convex people are bootless. All inertial people are bootless. Brock is bootless.", "logic": "\nLubricious(brock)\nnot Convex(brock)\nnot Lubricious(alwin)\nInertial(alwin)\nnot Convex(alwin)\nHypnotized(alwin)\nnot Convex(theresina)\nLubricious(riannon)\nnot Aphetic(riannon)\nInertial(riannon)\nConvex(riannon)\nBootless(riannon)\nLubricious(theresina) and Sandlike(theresina) -> Bootless(theresina)\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Bootless(x) -> Hypnotized(x))\nforall x (Bootless(x) and Lubricious(x) -> Hypnotized(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) -> Inertial(x))\nforall x (Inertial(x) and Convex(x) -> Bootless(x))\nforall x (Inertial(x) -> Bootless(x))\n\nBootless(brock)\n\nLubricious(brock) and forall x (Lubricious(x) -> Inertial(x)) -> therefore Inertial(brock) Inertial(brock) and forall x (Inertial(x) -> Bootless(x)) -> therefore Bootless(brock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Laina is roman. Laina is not balletic. Tommi is not roman. Tommi is plumping. Tommi is not balletic. Tommi is amuck. Cobby is not balletic. Kristin is roman. Kristin is not witless. Kristin is plumping. Kristin is balletic. Kristin is pantheist. If Cobby is roman and Cobby is aspirant then Cobby is pantheist. All roman, pantheist people are amuck. If someone is pantheist and roman then they are amuck. All roman people are plumping. Round, balletic people are pantheist. All plumping people are pantheist. Laina is not pantheist.", "logic": "\nRoman(laina)\nnot Balletic(laina)\nnot Roman(tommi)\nPlumping(tommi)\nnot Balletic(tommi)\nAmuck(tommi)\nnot Balletic(cobby)\nRoman(kristin)\nnot Witless(kristin)\nPlumping(kristin)\nBalletic(kristin)\nPantheist(kristin)\nRoman(cobby) and Aspirant(cobby) -> Pantheist(cobby)\nforall x (Roman(x) and Pantheist(x) -> Amuck(x))\nforall x (Pantheist(x) and Roman(x) -> Amuck(x))\nforall x (Roman(x) -> Plumping(x))\nforall x (Plumping(x) and Balletic(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Plumping(x) -> Pantheist(x))\n\nnot Pantheist(laina)\n\nRoman(laina) and forall x (Roman(x) -> Plumping(x)) -> therefore Plumping(laina) Plumping(laina) and forall x (Plumping(x) -> Pantheist(x)) -> therefore Pantheist(laina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Nellie is clubbish. Nellie is not east. Mick is not clubbish. Mick is blessed. Mick is not east. Mick is chiliastic. Ilsa is not east. Magnum is clubbish. Magnum is not catapultic. Magnum is blessed. Magnum is east. Magnum is scenic. If Ilsa is clubbish and Ilsa is moraceous then Ilsa is scenic. All clubbish, scenic people are chiliastic. If someone is scenic and clubbish then they are chiliastic. All clubbish people are blessed. Round, east people are scenic. All blessed people are scenic. Nellie is chiliastic.", "logic": "\nClubbish(nellie)\nnot East(nellie)\nnot Clubbish(mick)\nBlessed(mick)\nnot East(mick)\nChiliastic(mick)\nnot East(ilsa)\nClubbish(magnum)\nnot Catapultic(magnum)\nBlessed(magnum)\nEast(magnum)\nScenic(magnum)\nClubbish(ilsa) and Moraceous(ilsa) -> Scenic(ilsa)\nforall x (Clubbish(x) and Scenic(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\nforall x (Scenic(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\nforall x (Clubbish(x) -> Blessed(x))\nforall x (Blessed(x) and East(x) -> Scenic(x))\nforall x (Blessed(x) -> Scenic(x))\n\nChiliastic(nellie)\n\nClubbish(nellie) and forall x (Clubbish(x) -> Blessed(x)) -> therefore Blessed(nellie) Blessed(nellie) and forall x (Blessed(x) -> Scenic(x)) -> therefore Scenic(nellie) Clubbish(nellie) and Scenic(nellie) and forall x (Clubbish(x) and Scenic(x) -> Chiliastic(x)) -> therefore Chiliastic(nellie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Anett is upstage. Anett is not incertain. Shayla is not upstage. Shayla is fingered. Shayla is not incertain. Shayla is eupneic. Normie is not incertain. Natka is upstage. Natka is not indiscrete. Natka is fingered. Natka is incertain. Natka is strategic. If Normie is upstage and Normie is radiating then Normie is strategic. All upstage, strategic people are eupneic. If someone is strategic and upstage then they are eupneic. All upstage people are fingered. Round, incertain people are strategic. All fingered people are strategic. Anett is not eupneic.", "logic": "\nUpstage(anett)\nnot Incertain(anett)\nnot Upstage(shayla)\nFingered(shayla)\nnot Incertain(shayla)\nEupneic(shayla)\nnot Incertain(normie)\nUpstage(natka)\nnot Indiscrete(natka)\nFingered(natka)\nIncertain(natka)\nStrategic(natka)\nUpstage(normie) and Radiating(normie) -> Strategic(normie)\nforall x (Upstage(x) and Strategic(x) -> Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Strategic(x) and Upstage(x) -> Eupneic(x))\nforall x (Upstage(x) -> Fingered(x))\nforall x (Fingered(x) and Incertain(x) -> Strategic(x))\nforall x (Fingered(x) -> Strategic(x))\n\nnot Eupneic(anett)\n\nUpstage(anett) and forall x (Upstage(x) -> Fingered(x)) -> therefore Fingered(anett) Fingered(anett) and forall x (Fingered(x) -> Strategic(x)) -> therefore Strategic(anett) Upstage(anett) and Strategic(anett) and forall x (Upstage(x) and Strategic(x) -> Eupneic(x)) -> therefore Eupneic(anett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Idelle is northwest. Idelle is not glassless. Steffi is not northwest. Steffi is unrewarded. Steffi is not glassless. Steffi is eldest. Zabrina is not glassless. Cicily is northwest. Cicily is not disgraced. Cicily is unrewarded. Cicily is glassless. Cicily is belarusian. If Zabrina is northwest and Zabrina is foxy then Zabrina is belarusian. All northwest, belarusian people are eldest. If someone is belarusian and northwest then they are eldest. All northwest people are unrewarded. Round, glassless people are belarusian. All unrewarded people are belarusian. Zabrina is not eldest.", "logic": "\nNorthwest(idelle)\nnot Glassless(idelle)\nnot Northwest(steffi)\nUnrewarded(steffi)\nnot Glassless(steffi)\nEldest(steffi)\nnot Glassless(zabrina)\nNorthwest(cicily)\nnot Disgraced(cicily)\nUnrewarded(cicily)\nGlassless(cicily)\nBelarusian(cicily)\nNorthwest(zabrina) and Foxy(zabrina) -> Belarusian(zabrina)\nforall x (Northwest(x) and Belarusian(x) -> Eldest(x))\nforall x (Belarusian(x) and Northwest(x) -> Eldest(x))\nforall x (Northwest(x) -> Unrewarded(x))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) and Glassless(x) -> Belarusian(x))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Belarusian(x))\n\nnot Eldest(zabrina)\n\nforall x (Northwest(x) and Belarusian(x) -> Eldest(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Karel is found. Karel is not parametric. Giordano is not found. Giordano is theban. Giordano is not parametric. Giordano is unbeloved. Bliss is not parametric. Ulick is found. Ulick is not ginger. Ulick is theban. Ulick is parametric. Ulick is noisome. If Bliss is found and Bliss is jittery then Bliss is noisome. All found, noisome people are unbeloved. If someone is noisome and found then they are unbeloved. All found people are theban. Round, parametric people are noisome. All theban people are noisome. Bliss is noisome.", "logic": "\nFound(karel)\nnot Parametric(karel)\nnot Found(giordano)\nTheban(giordano)\nnot Parametric(giordano)\nUnbeloved(giordano)\nnot Parametric(bliss)\nFound(ulick)\nnot Ginger(ulick)\nTheban(ulick)\nParametric(ulick)\nNoisome(ulick)\nFound(bliss) and Jittery(bliss) -> Noisome(bliss)\nforall x (Found(x) and Noisome(x) -> Unbeloved(x))\nforall x (Noisome(x) and Found(x) -> Unbeloved(x))\nforall x (Found(x) -> Theban(x))\nforall x (Theban(x) and Parametric(x) -> Noisome(x))\nforall x (Theban(x) -> Noisome(x))\n\nNoisome(bliss)\n\nforall x (Theban(x) -> Noisome(x)) <- forall x (Found(x) -> Theban(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Zachariah is prussian. Zachariah is not unbanded. Terza is not prussian. Terza is tibial. Terza is not unbanded. Terza is disarming. Enoch is not unbanded. Hakim is prussian. Hakim is not lepidote. Hakim is tibial. Hakim is unbanded. Hakim is apropos. If Enoch is prussian and Enoch is rangy then Enoch is apropos. All prussian, apropos people are disarming. If someone is apropos and prussian then they are disarming. All prussian people are tibial. Round, unbanded people are apropos. All tibial people are apropos. Enoch is not tibial.", "logic": "\nPrussian(zachariah)\nnot Unbanded(zachariah)\nnot Prussian(terza)\nTibial(terza)\nnot Unbanded(terza)\nDisarming(terza)\nnot Unbanded(enoch)\nPrussian(hakim)\nnot Lepidote(hakim)\nTibial(hakim)\nUnbanded(hakim)\nApropos(hakim)\nPrussian(enoch) and Rangy(enoch) -> Apropos(enoch)\nforall x (Prussian(x) and Apropos(x) -> Disarming(x))\nforall x (Apropos(x) and Prussian(x) -> Disarming(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) -> Tibial(x))\nforall x (Tibial(x) and Unbanded(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Tibial(x) -> Apropos(x))\n\nnot Tibial(enoch)\n\nforall x (Prussian(x) -> Tibial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Foster is lubberly. Foster is not linguistic. Izak is not lubberly. Izak is wishful. Izak is not linguistic. Izak is leal. Clareta is not linguistic. Tierney is lubberly. Tierney is not saprobic. Tierney is wishful. Tierney is linguistic. Tierney is treacly. If Clareta is lubberly and Clareta is formless then Clareta is treacly. All lubberly, treacly people are leal. If someone is treacly and lubberly then they are leal. All lubberly people are wishful. Round, linguistic people are treacly. All wishful people are treacly. Foster is saprobic.", "logic": "\nLubberly(foster)\nnot Linguistic(foster)\nnot Lubberly(izak)\nWishful(izak)\nnot Linguistic(izak)\nLeal(izak)\nnot Linguistic(clareta)\nLubberly(tierney)\nnot Saprobic(tierney)\nWishful(tierney)\nLinguistic(tierney)\nTreacly(tierney)\nLubberly(clareta) and Formless(clareta) -> Treacly(clareta)\nforall x (Lubberly(x) and Treacly(x) -> Leal(x))\nforall x (Treacly(x) and Lubberly(x) -> Leal(x))\nforall x (Lubberly(x) -> Wishful(x))\nforall x (Wishful(x) and Linguistic(x) -> Treacly(x))\nforall x (Wishful(x) -> Treacly(x))\n\nSaprobic(foster)\n\nSaprobic(foster) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Chancey is veridical. Chancey is not cairned. Stu is not veridical. Stu is germfree. Stu is not cairned. Stu is jural. Corrina is not cairned. Anthony is veridical. Anthony is not shrewish. Anthony is germfree. Anthony is cairned. Anthony is troubling. If Corrina is veridical and Corrina is apnoeic then Corrina is troubling. All veridical, troubling people are jural. If someone is troubling and veridical then they are jural. All veridical people are germfree. Round, cairned people are troubling. All germfree people are troubling. Stu is not apnoeic.", "logic": "\nVeridical(chancey)\nnot Cairned(chancey)\nnot Veridical(stu)\nGermfree(stu)\nnot Cairned(stu)\nJural(stu)\nnot Cairned(corrina)\nVeridical(anthony)\nnot Shrewish(anthony)\nGermfree(anthony)\nCairned(anthony)\nTroubling(anthony)\nVeridical(corrina) and Apnoeic(corrina) -> Troubling(corrina)\nforall x (Veridical(x) and Troubling(x) -> Jural(x))\nforall x (Troubling(x) and Veridical(x) -> Jural(x))\nforall x (Veridical(x) -> Germfree(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) and Cairned(x) -> Troubling(x))\nforall x (Germfree(x) -> Troubling(x))\n\nnot Apnoeic(stu)\n\nnot Apnoeic(stu) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Millisent is suety. Millisent is not contralto. Karita is not suety. Karita is huxleian. Karita is not contralto. Karita is liberal. Madelina is not contralto. Davida is suety. Davida is not trivalent. Davida is huxleian. Davida is contralto. Davida is searing. If Madelina is suety and Madelina is hammered then Madelina is searing. All suety, searing people are liberal. If someone is searing and suety then they are liberal. All suety people are huxleian. Round, contralto people are searing. All huxleian people are searing. Madelina is hammered.", "logic": "\nSuety(millisent)\nnot Contralto(millisent)\nnot Suety(karita)\nHuxleian(karita)\nnot Contralto(karita)\nLiberal(karita)\nnot Contralto(madelina)\nSuety(davida)\nnot Trivalent(davida)\nHuxleian(davida)\nContralto(davida)\nSearing(davida)\nSuety(madelina) and Hammered(madelina) -> Searing(madelina)\nforall x (Suety(x) and Searing(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Searing(x) and Suety(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Suety(x) -> Huxleian(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) and Contralto(x) -> Searing(x))\nforall x (Huxleian(x) -> Searing(x))\n\nHammered(madelina)\n\nHammered(madelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Bettine is naval. Bettine is not chylous. Ragnar is not naval. Ragnar is lemony. Ragnar is not chylous. Ragnar is warming. Joscelin is not chylous. Chickie is naval. Chickie is not dextrous. Chickie is lemony. Chickie is chylous. Chickie is mangey. If Joscelin is naval and Joscelin is colonised then Joscelin is mangey. All naval, mangey people are warming. If someone is mangey and naval then they are warming. All naval people are lemony. Round, chylous people are mangey. All lemony people are mangey. Joscelin is not dextrous.", "logic": "\nNaval(bettine)\nnot Chylous(bettine)\nnot Naval(ragnar)\nLemony(ragnar)\nnot Chylous(ragnar)\nWarming(ragnar)\nnot Chylous(joscelin)\nNaval(chickie)\nnot Dextrous(chickie)\nLemony(chickie)\nChylous(chickie)\nMangey(chickie)\nNaval(joscelin) and Colonised(joscelin) -> Mangey(joscelin)\nforall x (Naval(x) and Mangey(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Mangey(x) and Naval(x) -> Warming(x))\nforall x (Naval(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Lemony(x) and Chylous(x) -> Mangey(x))\nforall x (Lemony(x) -> Mangey(x))\n\nnot Dextrous(joscelin)\n\nnot Dextrous(joscelin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Dewitt is deranged. Dewitt is not jade. Sophi is not deranged. Sophi is unheeding. Sophi is not jade. Sophi is special. Blakelee is not jade. Damian is deranged. Damian is not unbeholden. Damian is unheeding. Damian is jade. Damian is unclogged. If Blakelee is deranged and Blakelee is accessible then Blakelee is unclogged. All deranged, unclogged people are special. If someone is unclogged and deranged then they are special. All deranged people are unheeding. Round, jade people are unclogged. All unheeding people are unclogged. Dewitt is accessible.", "logic": "\nDeranged(dewitt)\nnot Jade(dewitt)\nnot Deranged(sophi)\nUnheeding(sophi)\nnot Jade(sophi)\nSpecial(sophi)\nnot Jade(blakelee)\nDeranged(damian)\nnot Unbeholden(damian)\nUnheeding(damian)\nJade(damian)\nUnclogged(damian)\nDeranged(blakelee) and Accessible(blakelee) -> Unclogged(blakelee)\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Unclogged(x) -> Special(x))\nforall x (Unclogged(x) and Deranged(x) -> Special(x))\nforall x (Deranged(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) and Jade(x) -> Unclogged(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) -> Unclogged(x))\n\nAccessible(dewitt)\n\nAccessible(dewitt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-300"} {"premises": "Guthrie is sudsy. Guthrie is seljuk. Guthrie is fourscore. Dolores is buttonlike. Dolores is fourscore. Dolores is altered. Teodora is sudsy. Teodora is seljuk. Teodora is buttonlike. Teodora is fourscore. Teodora is altered. Julienne is sudsy. Julienne is weighted. Julienne is buttonlike. Julienne is fourscore. Julienne is altered. All thrilling things are weighted. If something is weighted then it is sudsy. If something is altered then it is thrilling. Quiet things are altered. White, seljuk things are weighted. All weighted things are sudsy. Teodora is fourscore.", "logic": "\nSudsy(guthrie)\nSeljuk(guthrie)\nFourscore(guthrie)\nButtonlike(dolores)\nFourscore(dolores)\nAltered(dolores)\nSudsy(teodora)\nSeljuk(teodora)\nButtonlike(teodora)\nFourscore(teodora)\nAltered(teodora)\nSudsy(julienne)\nWeighted(julienne)\nButtonlike(julienne)\nFourscore(julienne)\nAltered(julienne)\nforall x (Thrilling(x) -> Weighted(x))\nforall x (Weighted(x) -> Sudsy(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Thrilling(x))\nforall x (Buttonlike(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) and Seljuk(x) -> Weighted(x))\nforall x (Weighted(x) -> Sudsy(x))\n\nFourscore(teodora)\n\ntherefore Fourscore(teodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Jannelle is bulky. Jannelle is biaural. Jannelle is enchanting. Marian is girlish. Marian is enchanting. Marian is rachitic. Alec is bulky. Alec is biaural. Alec is girlish. Alec is enchanting. Alec is rachitic. Elana is bulky. Elana is slatey. Elana is girlish. Elana is enchanting. Elana is rachitic. All myotonic things are slatey. If something is slatey then it is bulky. If something is rachitic then it is myotonic. Quiet things are rachitic. White, biaural things are slatey. All slatey things are bulky. Elana is not rachitic.", "logic": "\nBulky(jannelle)\nBiaural(jannelle)\nEnchanting(jannelle)\nGirlish(marian)\nEnchanting(marian)\nRachitic(marian)\nBulky(alec)\nBiaural(alec)\nGirlish(alec)\nEnchanting(alec)\nRachitic(alec)\nBulky(elana)\nSlatey(elana)\nGirlish(elana)\nEnchanting(elana)\nRachitic(elana)\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Slatey(x))\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Bulky(x))\nforall x (Rachitic(x) -> Myotonic(x))\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Rachitic(x))\nforall x (Rachitic(x) and Biaural(x) -> Slatey(x))\nforall x (Slatey(x) -> Bulky(x))\n\nnot Rachitic(elana)\n\ntherefore Rachitic(elana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Rodrick is unbigoted. Rodrick is undepicted. Rodrick is ireful. Sigfried is sloppy. Sigfried is ireful. Sigfried is spiky. Joab is unbigoted. Joab is undepicted. Joab is sloppy. Joab is ireful. Joab is spiky. Taddeus is unbigoted. Taddeus is binucleate. Taddeus is sloppy. Taddeus is ireful. Taddeus is spiky. All howling things are binucleate. If something is binucleate then it is unbigoted. If something is spiky then it is howling. Quiet things are spiky. White, undepicted things are binucleate. All binucleate things are unbigoted. Joab is binucleate.", "logic": "\nUnbigoted(rodrick)\nUndepicted(rodrick)\nIreful(rodrick)\nSloppy(sigfried)\nIreful(sigfried)\nSpiky(sigfried)\nUnbigoted(joab)\nUndepicted(joab)\nSloppy(joab)\nIreful(joab)\nSpiky(joab)\nUnbigoted(taddeus)\nBinucleate(taddeus)\nSloppy(taddeus)\nIreful(taddeus)\nSpiky(taddeus)\nforall x (Howling(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) -> Unbigoted(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) -> Howling(x))\nforall x (Sloppy(x) -> Spiky(x))\nforall x (Spiky(x) and Undepicted(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) -> Unbigoted(x))\n\nBinucleate(joab)\n\nSpiky(joab) and Undepicted(joab) and forall x (Spiky(x) and Undepicted(x) -> Binucleate(x)) -> therefore Binucleate(joab)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Hakim is eulogistic. Hakim is smothering. Hakim is baptistic. Lari is swift. Lari is baptistic. Lari is bareback. Robinia is eulogistic. Robinia is smothering. Robinia is swift. Robinia is baptistic. Robinia is bareback. Hiralal is eulogistic. Hiralal is manichee. Hiralal is swift. Hiralal is baptistic. Hiralal is bareback. All bilabial things are manichee. If something is manichee then it is eulogistic. If something is bareback then it is bilabial. Quiet things are bareback. White, smothering things are manichee. All manichee things are eulogistic. Hiralal is not bilabial.", "logic": "\nEulogistic(hakim)\nSmothering(hakim)\nBaptistic(hakim)\nSwift(lari)\nBaptistic(lari)\nBareback(lari)\nEulogistic(robinia)\nSmothering(robinia)\nSwift(robinia)\nBaptistic(robinia)\nBareback(robinia)\nEulogistic(hiralal)\nManichee(hiralal)\nSwift(hiralal)\nBaptistic(hiralal)\nBareback(hiralal)\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Manichee(x))\nforall x (Manichee(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) -> Bilabial(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) -> Bareback(x))\nforall x (Bareback(x) and Smothering(x) -> Manichee(x))\nforall x (Manichee(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\n\nnot Bilabial(hiralal)\n\nBareback(hiralal) and forall x (Bareback(x) -> Bilabial(x)) -> therefore Bilabial(hiralal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Fremont is blessed. Fremont is incident. Fremont is unrouged. Andre is piagetian. Andre is unrouged. Andre is impish. Pippa is blessed. Pippa is incident. Pippa is piagetian. Pippa is unrouged. Pippa is impish. Alica is blessed. Alica is falconine. Alica is piagetian. Alica is unrouged. Alica is impish. All bicuspid things are falconine. If something is falconine then it is blessed. If something is impish then it is bicuspid. Quiet things are impish. White, incident things are falconine. All falconine things are blessed. Andre is falconine.", "logic": "\nBlessed(fremont)\nIncident(fremont)\nUnrouged(fremont)\nPiagetian(andre)\nUnrouged(andre)\nImpish(andre)\nBlessed(pippa)\nIncident(pippa)\nPiagetian(pippa)\nUnrouged(pippa)\nImpish(pippa)\nBlessed(alica)\nFalconine(alica)\nPiagetian(alica)\nUnrouged(alica)\nImpish(alica)\nforall x (Bicuspid(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Falconine(x) -> Blessed(x))\nforall x (Impish(x) -> Bicuspid(x))\nforall x (Piagetian(x) -> Impish(x))\nforall x (Impish(x) and Incident(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Falconine(x) -> Blessed(x))\n\nFalconine(andre)\n\nImpish(andre) and forall x (Impish(x) -> Bicuspid(x)) -> therefore Bicuspid(andre) Bicuspid(andre) and forall x (Bicuspid(x) -> Falconine(x)) -> therefore Falconine(andre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Ardine is diestrual. Ardine is ageless. Ardine is lilting. Karita is unkindled. Karita is lilting. Karita is bicolored. Nataline is diestrual. Nataline is ageless. Nataline is unkindled. Nataline is lilting. Nataline is bicolored. Karalee is diestrual. Karalee is secular. Karalee is unkindled. Karalee is lilting. Karalee is bicolored. All intent things are secular. If something is secular then it is diestrual. If something is bicolored then it is intent. Quiet things are bicolored. White, ageless things are secular. All secular things are diestrual. Karita is not secular.", "logic": "\nDiestrual(ardine)\nAgeless(ardine)\nLilting(ardine)\nUnkindled(karita)\nLilting(karita)\nBicolored(karita)\nDiestrual(nataline)\nAgeless(nataline)\nUnkindled(nataline)\nLilting(nataline)\nBicolored(nataline)\nDiestrual(karalee)\nSecular(karalee)\nUnkindled(karalee)\nLilting(karalee)\nBicolored(karalee)\nforall x (Intent(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Secular(x) -> Diestrual(x))\nforall x (Bicolored(x) -> Intent(x))\nforall x (Unkindled(x) -> Bicolored(x))\nforall x (Bicolored(x) and Ageless(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Secular(x) -> Diestrual(x))\n\nnot Secular(karita)\n\nBicolored(karita) and forall x (Bicolored(x) -> Intent(x)) -> therefore Intent(karita) Intent(karita) and forall x (Intent(x) -> Secular(x)) -> therefore Secular(karita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Teodora is mycenaean. Teodora is undrawn. Teodora is unsought. Stu is microbic. Stu is unsought. Stu is satiable. Nell is mycenaean. Nell is undrawn. Nell is microbic. Nell is unsought. Nell is satiable. Coral is mycenaean. Coral is dicky. Coral is microbic. Coral is unsought. Coral is satiable. All double things are dicky. If something is dicky then it is mycenaean. If something is satiable then it is double. Quiet things are satiable. White, undrawn things are dicky. All dicky things are mycenaean. Stu is mycenaean.", "logic": "\nMycenaean(teodora)\nUndrawn(teodora)\nUnsought(teodora)\nMicrobic(stu)\nUnsought(stu)\nSatiable(stu)\nMycenaean(nell)\nUndrawn(nell)\nMicrobic(nell)\nUnsought(nell)\nSatiable(nell)\nMycenaean(coral)\nDicky(coral)\nMicrobic(coral)\nUnsought(coral)\nSatiable(coral)\nforall x (Double(x) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Satiable(x) -> Double(x))\nforall x (Microbic(x) -> Satiable(x))\nforall x (Satiable(x) and Undrawn(x) -> Dicky(x))\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\n\nMycenaean(stu)\n\nSatiable(stu) and forall x (Satiable(x) -> Double(x)) -> therefore Double(stu) Double(stu) and forall x (Double(x) -> Dicky(x)) -> therefore Dicky(stu) Dicky(stu) and forall x (Dicky(x) -> Mycenaean(x)) -> therefore Mycenaean(stu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Barton is addible. Barton is dyspneic. Barton is liquid. Cliff is anestric. Cliff is liquid. Cliff is endoergic. Margot is addible. Margot is dyspneic. Margot is anestric. Margot is liquid. Margot is endoergic. Anders is addible. Anders is archaic. Anders is anestric. Anders is liquid. Anders is endoergic. All socialist things are archaic. If something is archaic then it is addible. If something is endoergic then it is socialist. Quiet things are endoergic. White, dyspneic things are archaic. All archaic things are addible. Cliff is not addible.", "logic": "\nAddible(barton)\nDyspneic(barton)\nLiquid(barton)\nAnestric(cliff)\nLiquid(cliff)\nEndoergic(cliff)\nAddible(margot)\nDyspneic(margot)\nAnestric(margot)\nLiquid(margot)\nEndoergic(margot)\nAddible(anders)\nArchaic(anders)\nAnestric(anders)\nLiquid(anders)\nEndoergic(anders)\nforall x (Socialist(x) -> Archaic(x))\nforall x (Archaic(x) -> Addible(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> Socialist(x))\nforall x (Anestric(x) -> Endoergic(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and Dyspneic(x) -> Archaic(x))\nforall x (Archaic(x) -> Addible(x))\n\nnot Addible(cliff)\n\nEndoergic(cliff) and forall x (Endoergic(x) -> Socialist(x)) -> therefore Socialist(cliff) Socialist(cliff) and forall x (Socialist(x) -> Archaic(x)) -> therefore Archaic(cliff) Archaic(cliff) and forall x (Archaic(x) -> Addible(x)) -> therefore Addible(cliff)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Madelyn is buff. Madelyn is rubber. Madelyn is boney. Augustin is european. Augustin is boney. Augustin is bone. Benn is buff. Benn is rubber. Benn is european. Benn is boney. Benn is bone. Basia is buff. Basia is fascinated. Basia is european. Basia is boney. Basia is bone. All witless things are fascinated. If something is fascinated then it is buff. If something is bone then it is witless. Quiet things are bone. White, rubber things are fascinated. All fascinated things are buff. Madelyn is not witless.", "logic": "\nBuff(madelyn)\nRubber(madelyn)\nBoney(madelyn)\nEuropean(augustin)\nBoney(augustin)\nBone(augustin)\nBuff(benn)\nRubber(benn)\nEuropean(benn)\nBoney(benn)\nBone(benn)\nBuff(basia)\nFascinated(basia)\nEuropean(basia)\nBoney(basia)\nBone(basia)\nforall x (Witless(x) -> Fascinated(x))\nforall x (Fascinated(x) -> Buff(x))\nforall x (Bone(x) -> Witless(x))\nforall x (European(x) -> Bone(x))\nforall x (Bone(x) and Rubber(x) -> Fascinated(x))\nforall x (Fascinated(x) -> Buff(x))\n\nnot Witless(madelyn)\n\nforall x (Bone(x) -> Witless(x)) <- forall x (European(x) -> Bone(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Konstanze is roman. Konstanze is steepish. Konstanze is plenary. Seka is prongy. Seka is plenary. Seka is enzymatic. Barbette is roman. Barbette is steepish. Barbette is prongy. Barbette is plenary. Barbette is enzymatic. Winford is roman. Winford is empathetic. Winford is prongy. Winford is plenary. Winford is enzymatic. All cockeyed things are empathetic. If something is empathetic then it is roman. If something is enzymatic then it is cockeyed. Quiet things are enzymatic. White, steepish things are empathetic. All empathetic things are roman. Konstanze is empathetic.", "logic": "\nRoman(konstanze)\nSteepish(konstanze)\nPlenary(konstanze)\nProngy(seka)\nPlenary(seka)\nEnzymatic(seka)\nRoman(barbette)\nSteepish(barbette)\nProngy(barbette)\nPlenary(barbette)\nEnzymatic(barbette)\nRoman(winford)\nEmpathetic(winford)\nProngy(winford)\nPlenary(winford)\nEnzymatic(winford)\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Roman(x))\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Cockeyed(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) -> Enzymatic(x))\nforall x (Enzymatic(x) and Steepish(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Roman(x))\n\nEmpathetic(konstanze)\n\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) -> Empathetic(x)) <- forall x (Enzymatic(x) -> Cockeyed(x)) <- forall x (Prongy(x) -> Enzymatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Rosalie is pretended. Rosalie is senile. Rosalie is literary. Benny is plural. Benny is literary. Benny is dorian. Cornela is pretended. Cornela is senile. Cornela is plural. Cornela is literary. Cornela is dorian. Helena is pretended. Helena is dionysian. Helena is plural. Helena is literary. Helena is dorian. All striking things are dionysian. If something is dionysian then it is pretended. If something is dorian then it is striking. Quiet things are dorian. White, senile things are dionysian. All dionysian things are pretended. Rosalie is not dorian.", "logic": "\nPretended(rosalie)\nSenile(rosalie)\nLiterary(rosalie)\nPlural(benny)\nLiterary(benny)\nDorian(benny)\nPretended(cornela)\nSenile(cornela)\nPlural(cornela)\nLiterary(cornela)\nDorian(cornela)\nPretended(helena)\nDionysian(helena)\nPlural(helena)\nLiterary(helena)\nDorian(helena)\nforall x (Striking(x) -> Dionysian(x))\nforall x (Dionysian(x) -> Pretended(x))\nforall x (Dorian(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Plural(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Dorian(x) and Senile(x) -> Dionysian(x))\nforall x (Dionysian(x) -> Pretended(x))\n\nnot Dorian(rosalie)\n\nforall x (Plural(x) -> Dorian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Kari is galvanic. Kari is achromatic. Kari is anorthitic. Kip is barbellate. Kip is anorthitic. Kip is enumerable. Prescott is galvanic. Prescott is achromatic. Prescott is barbellate. Prescott is anorthitic. Prescott is enumerable. Vinny is galvanic. Vinny is leechlike. Vinny is barbellate. Vinny is anorthitic. Vinny is enumerable. All eight things are leechlike. If something is leechlike then it is galvanic. If something is enumerable then it is eight. Quiet things are enumerable. White, achromatic things are leechlike. All leechlike things are galvanic. Kip is achromatic.", "logic": "\nGalvanic(kari)\nAchromatic(kari)\nAnorthitic(kari)\nBarbellate(kip)\nAnorthitic(kip)\nEnumerable(kip)\nGalvanic(prescott)\nAchromatic(prescott)\nBarbellate(prescott)\nAnorthitic(prescott)\nEnumerable(prescott)\nGalvanic(vinny)\nLeechlike(vinny)\nBarbellate(vinny)\nAnorthitic(vinny)\nEnumerable(vinny)\nforall x (Eight(x) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) -> Galvanic(x))\nforall x (Enumerable(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Enumerable(x))\nforall x (Enumerable(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) -> Galvanic(x))\n\nAchromatic(kip)\n\nAchromatic(kip) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Emelina is cloudy. Emelina is motor. Emelina is cryogenic. Shepperd is fouled. Shepperd is cryogenic. Shepperd is vendable. Inigo is cloudy. Inigo is motor. Inigo is fouled. Inigo is cryogenic. Inigo is vendable. Alf is cloudy. Alf is needed. Alf is fouled. Alf is cryogenic. Alf is vendable. All lost things are needed. If something is needed then it is cloudy. If something is vendable then it is lost. Quiet things are vendable. White, motor things are needed. All needed things are cloudy. Emelina is not fouled.", "logic": "\nCloudy(emelina)\nMotor(emelina)\nCryogenic(emelina)\nFouled(shepperd)\nCryogenic(shepperd)\nVendable(shepperd)\nCloudy(inigo)\nMotor(inigo)\nFouled(inigo)\nCryogenic(inigo)\nVendable(inigo)\nCloudy(alf)\nNeeded(alf)\nFouled(alf)\nCryogenic(alf)\nVendable(alf)\nforall x (Lost(x) -> Needed(x))\nforall x (Needed(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Vendable(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) -> Vendable(x))\nforall x (Vendable(x) and Motor(x) -> Needed(x))\nforall x (Needed(x) -> Cloudy(x))\n\nnot Fouled(emelina)\n\nnot Fouled(emelina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "Niki is optative. Niki is carthusian. Niki is irate. Isabelita is fringed. Isabelita is irate. Isabelita is palladian. Howie is optative. Howie is carthusian. Howie is fringed. Howie is irate. Howie is palladian. Britta is optative. Britta is notable. Britta is fringed. Britta is irate. Britta is palladian. All circular things are notable. If something is notable then it is optative. If something is palladian then it is circular. Quiet things are palladian. White, carthusian things are notable. All notable things are optative. Britta is carthusian.", "logic": "\nOptative(niki)\nCarthusian(niki)\nIrate(niki)\nFringed(isabelita)\nIrate(isabelita)\nPalladian(isabelita)\nOptative(howie)\nCarthusian(howie)\nFringed(howie)\nIrate(howie)\nPalladian(howie)\nOptative(britta)\nNotable(britta)\nFringed(britta)\nIrate(britta)\nPalladian(britta)\nforall x (Circular(x) -> Notable(x))\nforall x (Notable(x) -> Optative(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Circular(x))\nforall x (Fringed(x) -> Palladian(x))\nforall x (Palladian(x) and Carthusian(x) -> Notable(x))\nforall x (Notable(x) -> Optative(x))\n\nCarthusian(britta)\n\nCarthusian(britta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1029"} {"premises": "The teodorico honey the sibbie. The grata honey the teodorico. The cherish honey the teodorico. The cherish honey the sibbie. The cherish puzzle the sibbie. The sibbie is ultra. The sibbie is unhearable. If the teodorico anatomise the cherish then the teodorico is ultra. If something anatomise the sibbie and it is iodised then the sibbie anatomise the teodorico. If the sibbie puzzle the grata then the grata puzzle the sibbie. If something puzzle the teodorico then it puzzle the grata. If something anatomise the grata then the grata is toeless. If something is ultra and it anatomise the cherish then it honey the teodorico. If something honey the sibbie then it is toeless. If something puzzle the sibbie then the sibbie puzzle the teodorico. The cherish honey the teodorico.", "logic": "\nHoney(teodorico, sibbie)\nHoney(grata, teodorico)\nHoney(cherish, teodorico)\nHoney(cherish, sibbie)\nPuzzle(cherish, sibbie)\nUltra(sibbie)\nUnhearable(sibbie)\nAnatomise(teodorico, cherish) -> Ultra(teodorico)\nforall x (Anatomise(x, sibbie) and Iodised(x) -> Anatomise(sibbie, teodorico))\nPuzzle(sibbie, grata) -> Puzzle(grata, sibbie)\nforall x (Puzzle(x, teodorico) -> Puzzle(x, grata))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, grata) -> Toeless(grata))\nforall x (Ultra(x) and Anatomise(x, cherish) -> Honey(x, teodorico))\nforall x (Honey(x, sibbie) -> Toeless(x))\nforall x (Puzzle(x, sibbie) -> Puzzle(sibbie, teodorico))\n\nHoney(cherish, teodorico)\n\ntherefore Honey(cherish, teodorico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The germaine neuter the jeremiah. The tallie neuter the germaine. The sherie neuter the germaine. The sherie neuter the jeremiah. The sherie resound the jeremiah. The jeremiah is thoriated. The jeremiah is excusable. If the germaine mismate the sherie then the germaine is thoriated. If something mismate the jeremiah and it is combed then the jeremiah mismate the germaine. If the jeremiah resound the tallie then the tallie resound the jeremiah. If something resound the germaine then it resound the tallie. If something mismate the tallie then the tallie is aggregate. If something is thoriated and it mismate the sherie then it neuter the germaine. If something neuter the jeremiah then it is aggregate. If something resound the jeremiah then the jeremiah resound the germaine. The sherie does not eat the jeremiah.", "logic": "\nNeuter(germaine, jeremiah)\nNeuter(tallie, germaine)\nNeuter(sherie, germaine)\nNeuter(sherie, jeremiah)\nResound(sherie, jeremiah)\nThoriated(jeremiah)\nExcusable(jeremiah)\nMismate(germaine, sherie) -> Thoriated(germaine)\nforall x (Mismate(x, jeremiah) and Combed(x) -> Mismate(jeremiah, germaine))\nResound(jeremiah, tallie) -> Resound(tallie, jeremiah)\nforall x (Resound(x, germaine) -> Resound(x, tallie))\nforall x (Mismate(x, tallie) -> Aggregate(tallie))\nforall x (Thoriated(x) and Mismate(x, sherie) -> Neuter(x, germaine))\nforall x (Neuter(x, jeremiah) -> Aggregate(x))\nforall x (Resound(x, jeremiah) -> Resound(jeremiah, germaine))\n\nnot Neuter(sherie, jeremiah)\n\ntherefore Neuter(sherie, jeremiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The craig engorge the angeline. The vanda engorge the craig. The lynnett engorge the craig. The lynnett engorge the angeline. The lynnett doze the angeline. The angeline is orthoptic. The angeline is neuralgic. If the craig cuddle the lynnett then the craig is orthoptic. If something cuddle the angeline and it is shamanist then the angeline cuddle the craig. If the angeline doze the vanda then the vanda doze the angeline. If something doze the craig then it doze the vanda. If something cuddle the vanda then the vanda is untempered. If something is orthoptic and it cuddle the lynnett then it engorge the craig. If something engorge the angeline then it is untempered. If something doze the angeline then the angeline doze the craig. The angeline doze the craig.", "logic": "\nEngorge(craig, angeline)\nEngorge(vanda, craig)\nEngorge(lynnett, craig)\nEngorge(lynnett, angeline)\nDoze(lynnett, angeline)\nOrthoptic(angeline)\nNeuralgic(angeline)\nCuddle(craig, lynnett) -> Orthoptic(craig)\nforall x (Cuddle(x, angeline) and Shamanist(x) -> Cuddle(angeline, craig))\nDoze(angeline, vanda) -> Doze(vanda, angeline)\nforall x (Doze(x, craig) -> Doze(x, vanda))\nforall x (Cuddle(x, vanda) -> Untempered(vanda))\nforall x (Orthoptic(x) and Cuddle(x, lynnett) -> Engorge(x, craig))\nforall x (Engorge(x, angeline) -> Untempered(x))\nforall x (Doze(x, angeline) -> Doze(angeline, craig))\n\nDoze(angeline, craig)\n\nDoze(lynnett, angeline) and forall x (Doze(x, angeline) -> Doze(angeline, craig)) -> therefore Doze(angeline, craig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The kimbra engross the lacy. The stanton engross the kimbra. The geralda engross the kimbra. The geralda engross the lacy. The geralda retrace the lacy. The lacy is allegretto. The lacy is wooly. If the kimbra triplicate the geralda then the kimbra is allegretto. If something triplicate the lacy and it is activistic then the lacy triplicate the kimbra. If the lacy retrace the stanton then the stanton retrace the lacy. If something retrace the kimbra then it retrace the stanton. If something triplicate the stanton then the stanton is remorseful. If something is allegretto and it triplicate the geralda then it engross the kimbra. If something engross the lacy then it is remorseful. If something retrace the lacy then the lacy retrace the kimbra. The geralda is not remorseful.", "logic": "\nEngross(kimbra, lacy)\nEngross(stanton, kimbra)\nEngross(geralda, kimbra)\nEngross(geralda, lacy)\nRetrace(geralda, lacy)\nAllegretto(lacy)\nWooly(lacy)\nTriplicate(kimbra, geralda) -> Allegretto(kimbra)\nforall x (Triplicate(x, lacy) and Activistic(x) -> Triplicate(lacy, kimbra))\nRetrace(lacy, stanton) -> Retrace(stanton, lacy)\nforall x (Retrace(x, kimbra) -> Retrace(x, stanton))\nforall x (Triplicate(x, stanton) -> Remorseful(stanton))\nforall x (Allegretto(x) and Triplicate(x, geralda) -> Engross(x, kimbra))\nforall x (Engross(x, lacy) -> Remorseful(x))\nforall x (Retrace(x, lacy) -> Retrace(lacy, kimbra))\n\nnot Remorseful(geralda)\n\nEngross(geralda, lacy) and forall x (Engross(x, lacy) -> Remorseful(x)) -> therefore Remorseful(geralda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The corabella segment the vilma. The melba segment the corabella. The fawna segment the corabella. The fawna segment the vilma. The fawna tabularize the vilma. The vilma is jubilant. The vilma is finespun. If the corabella aerosolize the fawna then the corabella is jubilant. If something aerosolize the vilma and it is uninspired then the vilma aerosolize the corabella. If the vilma tabularize the melba then the melba tabularize the vilma. If something tabularize the corabella then it tabularize the melba. If something aerosolize the melba then the melba is airlike. If something is jubilant and it aerosolize the fawna then it segment the corabella. If something segment the vilma then it is airlike. If something tabularize the vilma then the vilma tabularize the corabella. The vilma tabularize the melba.", "logic": "\nSegment(corabella, vilma)\nSegment(melba, corabella)\nSegment(fawna, corabella)\nSegment(fawna, vilma)\nTabularize(fawna, vilma)\nJubilant(vilma)\nFinespun(vilma)\nAerosolize(corabella, fawna) -> Jubilant(corabella)\nforall x (Aerosolize(x, vilma) and Uninspired(x) -> Aerosolize(vilma, corabella))\nTabularize(vilma, melba) -> Tabularize(melba, vilma)\nforall x (Tabularize(x, corabella) -> Tabularize(x, melba))\nforall x (Aerosolize(x, melba) -> Airlike(melba))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) and Aerosolize(x, fawna) -> Segment(x, corabella))\nforall x (Segment(x, vilma) -> Airlike(x))\nforall x (Tabularize(x, vilma) -> Tabularize(vilma, corabella))\n\nTabularize(vilma, melba)\n\nTabularize(fawna, vilma) and forall x (Tabularize(x, vilma) -> Tabularize(vilma, corabella)) -> therefore Tabularize(vilma, corabella) Tabularize(vilma, corabella) and forall x (Tabularize(x, corabella) -> Tabularize(x, melba)) -> therefore Tabularize(vilma, melba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The hildagard eclipse the jaquith. The bridget eclipse the hildagard. The lynnett eclipse the hildagard. The lynnett eclipse the jaquith. The lynnett supplement the jaquith. The jaquith is seagirt. The jaquith is beardown. If the hildagard needle the lynnett then the hildagard is seagirt. If something needle the jaquith and it is smashed then the jaquith needle the hildagard. If the jaquith supplement the bridget then the bridget supplement the jaquith. If something supplement the hildagard then it supplement the bridget. If something needle the bridget then the bridget is headless. If something is seagirt and it needle the lynnett then it eclipse the hildagard. If something eclipse the jaquith then it is headless. If something supplement the jaquith then the jaquith supplement the hildagard. The jaquith does not visit the bridget.", "logic": "\nEclipse(hildagard, jaquith)\nEclipse(bridget, hildagard)\nEclipse(lynnett, hildagard)\nEclipse(lynnett, jaquith)\nSupplement(lynnett, jaquith)\nSeagirt(jaquith)\nBeardown(jaquith)\nNeedle(hildagard, lynnett) -> Seagirt(hildagard)\nforall x (Needle(x, jaquith) and Smashed(x) -> Needle(jaquith, hildagard))\nSupplement(jaquith, bridget) -> Supplement(bridget, jaquith)\nforall x (Supplement(x, hildagard) -> Supplement(x, bridget))\nforall x (Needle(x, bridget) -> Headless(bridget))\nforall x (Seagirt(x) and Needle(x, lynnett) -> Eclipse(x, hildagard))\nforall x (Eclipse(x, jaquith) -> Headless(x))\nforall x (Supplement(x, jaquith) -> Supplement(jaquith, hildagard))\n\nnot Supplement(jaquith, bridget)\n\nSupplement(lynnett, jaquith) and forall x (Supplement(x, jaquith) -> Supplement(jaquith, hildagard)) -> therefore Supplement(jaquith, hildagard) Supplement(jaquith, hildagard) and forall x (Supplement(x, hildagard) -> Supplement(x, bridget)) -> therefore Supplement(jaquith, bridget)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The ronny crave the nerty. The axel crave the ronny. The mahesh crave the ronny. The mahesh crave the nerty. The mahesh secularise the nerty. The nerty is famed. The nerty is connatural. If the ronny bird the mahesh then the ronny is famed. If something bird the nerty and it is seminal then the nerty bird the ronny. If the nerty secularise the axel then the axel secularise the nerty. If something secularise the ronny then it secularise the axel. If something bird the axel then the axel is hypnagogic. If something is famed and it bird the mahesh then it crave the ronny. If something crave the nerty then it is hypnagogic. If something secularise the nerty then the nerty secularise the ronny. The axel secularise the nerty.", "logic": "\nCrave(ronny, nerty)\nCrave(axel, ronny)\nCrave(mahesh, ronny)\nCrave(mahesh, nerty)\nSecularise(mahesh, nerty)\nFamed(nerty)\nConnatural(nerty)\nBird(ronny, mahesh) -> Famed(ronny)\nforall x (Bird(x, nerty) and Seminal(x) -> Bird(nerty, ronny))\nSecularise(nerty, axel) -> Secularise(axel, nerty)\nforall x (Secularise(x, ronny) -> Secularise(x, axel))\nforall x (Bird(x, axel) -> Hypnagogic(axel))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Bird(x, mahesh) -> Crave(x, ronny))\nforall x (Crave(x, nerty) -> Hypnagogic(x))\nforall x (Secularise(x, nerty) -> Secularise(nerty, ronny))\n\nSecularise(axel, nerty)\n\nSecularise(mahesh, nerty) and forall x (Secularise(x, nerty) -> Secularise(nerty, ronny)) -> therefore Secularise(nerty, ronny) Secularise(nerty, ronny) and forall x (Secularise(x, ronny) -> Secularise(x, axel)) -> therefore Secularise(nerty, axel) Secularise(nerty, axel) and Secularise(nerty, axel) -> Secularise(axel, nerty) -> therefore Secularise(axel, nerty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The lindsy unhook the valenka. The ruddy unhook the lindsy. The dottie unhook the lindsy. The dottie unhook the valenka. The dottie shelve the valenka. The valenka is upmarket. The valenka is vermiform. If the lindsy collogue the dottie then the lindsy is upmarket. If something collogue the valenka and it is pastelike then the valenka collogue the lindsy. If the valenka shelve the ruddy then the ruddy shelve the valenka. If something shelve the lindsy then it shelve the ruddy. If something collogue the ruddy then the ruddy is moot. If something is upmarket and it collogue the dottie then it unhook the lindsy. If something unhook the valenka then it is moot. If something shelve the valenka then the valenka shelve the lindsy. The ruddy does not visit the valenka.", "logic": "\nUnhook(lindsy, valenka)\nUnhook(ruddy, lindsy)\nUnhook(dottie, lindsy)\nUnhook(dottie, valenka)\nShelve(dottie, valenka)\nUpmarket(valenka)\nVermiform(valenka)\nCollogue(lindsy, dottie) -> Upmarket(lindsy)\nforall x (Collogue(x, valenka) and Pastelike(x) -> Collogue(valenka, lindsy))\nShelve(valenka, ruddy) -> Shelve(ruddy, valenka)\nforall x (Shelve(x, lindsy) -> Shelve(x, ruddy))\nforall x (Collogue(x, ruddy) -> Moot(ruddy))\nforall x (Upmarket(x) and Collogue(x, dottie) -> Unhook(x, lindsy))\nforall x (Unhook(x, valenka) -> Moot(x))\nforall x (Shelve(x, valenka) -> Shelve(valenka, lindsy))\n\nnot Shelve(ruddy, valenka)\n\nShelve(dottie, valenka) and forall x (Shelve(x, valenka) -> Shelve(valenka, lindsy)) -> therefore Shelve(valenka, lindsy) Shelve(valenka, lindsy) and forall x (Shelve(x, lindsy) -> Shelve(x, ruddy)) -> therefore Shelve(valenka, ruddy) Shelve(valenka, ruddy) and Shelve(valenka, ruddy) -> Shelve(ruddy, valenka) -> therefore Shelve(ruddy, valenka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The ofella eclipse the aida. The tiler eclipse the ofella. The nicholle eclipse the ofella. The nicholle eclipse the aida. The nicholle typify the aida. The aida is paradisaic. The aida is adamantine. If the ofella cover the nicholle then the ofella is paradisaic. If something cover the aida and it is acrid then the aida cover the ofella. If the aida typify the tiler then the tiler typify the aida. If something typify the ofella then it typify the tiler. If something cover the tiler then the tiler is somalian. If something is paradisaic and it cover the nicholle then it eclipse the ofella. If something eclipse the aida then it is somalian. If something typify the aida then the aida typify the ofella. The aida does not see the ofella.", "logic": "\nEclipse(ofella, aida)\nEclipse(tiler, ofella)\nEclipse(nicholle, ofella)\nEclipse(nicholle, aida)\nTypify(nicholle, aida)\nParadisaic(aida)\nAdamantine(aida)\nCover(ofella, nicholle) -> Paradisaic(ofella)\nforall x (Cover(x, aida) and Acrid(x) -> Cover(aida, ofella))\nTypify(aida, tiler) -> Typify(tiler, aida)\nforall x (Typify(x, ofella) -> Typify(x, tiler))\nforall x (Cover(x, tiler) -> Somalian(tiler))\nforall x (Paradisaic(x) and Cover(x, nicholle) -> Eclipse(x, ofella))\nforall x (Eclipse(x, aida) -> Somalian(x))\nforall x (Typify(x, aida) -> Typify(aida, ofella))\n\nnot Cover(aida, ofella)\n\nforall x (Cover(x, aida) and Acrid(x) -> Cover(aida, ofella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The pansy vacation the warner. The ame vacation the pansy. The derrin vacation the pansy. The derrin vacation the warner. The derrin cornice the warner. The warner is umteenth. The warner is parotid. If the pansy profane the derrin then the pansy is umteenth. If something profane the warner and it is comic then the warner profane the pansy. If the warner cornice the ame then the ame cornice the warner. If something cornice the pansy then it cornice the ame. If something profane the ame then the ame is sandy. If something is umteenth and it profane the derrin then it vacation the pansy. If something vacation the warner then it is sandy. If something cornice the warner then the warner cornice the pansy. The pansy vacation the pansy.", "logic": "\nVacation(pansy, warner)\nVacation(ame, pansy)\nVacation(derrin, pansy)\nVacation(derrin, warner)\nCornice(derrin, warner)\nUmteenth(warner)\nParotid(warner)\nProfane(pansy, derrin) -> Umteenth(pansy)\nforall x (Profane(x, warner) and Comic(x) -> Profane(warner, pansy))\nCornice(warner, ame) -> Cornice(ame, warner)\nforall x (Cornice(x, pansy) -> Cornice(x, ame))\nforall x (Profane(x, ame) -> Sandy(ame))\nforall x (Umteenth(x) and Profane(x, derrin) -> Vacation(x, pansy))\nforall x (Vacation(x, warner) -> Sandy(x))\nforall x (Cornice(x, warner) -> Cornice(warner, pansy))\n\nVacation(pansy, pansy)\n\nforall x (Umteenth(x) and Profane(x, derrin) -> Vacation(x, pansy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The griselda prim the ulric. The meggi prim the griselda. The mitzi prim the griselda. The mitzi prim the ulric. The mitzi energize the ulric. The ulric is unpopular. The ulric is meritless. If the griselda pocket the mitzi then the griselda is unpopular. If something pocket the ulric and it is thrown then the ulric pocket the griselda. If the ulric energize the meggi then the meggi energize the ulric. If something energize the griselda then it energize the meggi. If something pocket the meggi then the meggi is burdened. If something is unpopular and it pocket the mitzi then it prim the griselda. If something prim the ulric then it is burdened. If something energize the ulric then the ulric energize the griselda. The meggi is not burdened.", "logic": "\nPrim(griselda, ulric)\nPrim(meggi, griselda)\nPrim(mitzi, griselda)\nPrim(mitzi, ulric)\nEnergize(mitzi, ulric)\nUnpopular(ulric)\nMeritless(ulric)\nPocket(griselda, mitzi) -> Unpopular(griselda)\nforall x (Pocket(x, ulric) and Thrown(x) -> Pocket(ulric, griselda))\nEnergize(ulric, meggi) -> Energize(meggi, ulric)\nforall x (Energize(x, griselda) -> Energize(x, meggi))\nforall x (Pocket(x, meggi) -> Burdened(meggi))\nforall x (Unpopular(x) and Pocket(x, mitzi) -> Prim(x, griselda))\nforall x (Prim(x, ulric) -> Burdened(x))\nforall x (Energize(x, ulric) -> Energize(ulric, griselda))\n\nnot Burdened(meggi)\n\nforall x (Pocket(x, meggi) -> Burdened(meggi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The solly pearl the margarita. The winton pearl the solly. The hayley pearl the solly. The hayley pearl the margarita. The hayley toenail the margarita. The margarita is vermilion. The margarita is orthodox. If the solly glimmer the hayley then the solly is vermilion. If something glimmer the margarita and it is ignoble then the margarita glimmer the solly. If the margarita toenail the winton then the winton toenail the margarita. If something toenail the solly then it toenail the winton. If something glimmer the winton then the winton is proximo. If something is vermilion and it glimmer the hayley then it pearl the solly. If something pearl the margarita then it is proximo. If something toenail the margarita then the margarita toenail the solly. The solly is vermilion.", "logic": "\nPearl(solly, margarita)\nPearl(winton, solly)\nPearl(hayley, solly)\nPearl(hayley, margarita)\nToenail(hayley, margarita)\nVermilion(margarita)\nOrthodox(margarita)\nGlimmer(solly, hayley) -> Vermilion(solly)\nforall x (Glimmer(x, margarita) and Ignoble(x) -> Glimmer(margarita, solly))\nToenail(margarita, winton) -> Toenail(winton, margarita)\nforall x (Toenail(x, solly) -> Toenail(x, winton))\nforall x (Glimmer(x, winton) -> Proximo(winton))\nforall x (Vermilion(x) and Glimmer(x, hayley) -> Pearl(x, solly))\nforall x (Pearl(x, margarita) -> Proximo(x))\nforall x (Toenail(x, margarita) -> Toenail(margarita, solly))\n\nVermilion(solly)\n\nGlimmer(solly, hayley) -> Vermilion(solly) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The marin cuckold the aggi. The carlye cuckold the marin. The flin cuckold the marin. The flin cuckold the aggi. The flin misaddress the aggi. The aggi is etiolate. The aggi is conjunct. If the marin canal the flin then the marin is etiolate. If something canal the aggi and it is undesigned then the aggi canal the marin. If the aggi misaddress the carlye then the carlye misaddress the aggi. If something misaddress the marin then it misaddress the carlye. If something canal the carlye then the carlye is condylar. If something is etiolate and it canal the flin then it cuckold the marin. If something cuckold the aggi then it is condylar. If something misaddress the aggi then the aggi misaddress the marin. The marin does not eat the carlye.", "logic": "\nCuckold(marin, aggi)\nCuckold(carlye, marin)\nCuckold(flin, marin)\nCuckold(flin, aggi)\nMisaddress(flin, aggi)\nEtiolate(aggi)\nConjunct(aggi)\nCanal(marin, flin) -> Etiolate(marin)\nforall x (Canal(x, aggi) and Undesigned(x) -> Canal(aggi, marin))\nMisaddress(aggi, carlye) -> Misaddress(carlye, aggi)\nforall x (Misaddress(x, marin) -> Misaddress(x, carlye))\nforall x (Canal(x, carlye) -> Condylar(carlye))\nforall x (Etiolate(x) and Canal(x, flin) -> Cuckold(x, marin))\nforall x (Cuckold(x, aggi) -> Condylar(x))\nforall x (Misaddress(x, aggi) -> Misaddress(aggi, marin))\n\nnot Cuckold(marin, carlye)\n\nnot Cuckold(marin, carlye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The atalanta recycle the esta. The gino recycle the atalanta. The royal recycle the atalanta. The royal recycle the esta. The royal caponise the esta. The esta is epochal. The esta is hated. If the atalanta trail the royal then the atalanta is epochal. If something trail the esta and it is unselfish then the esta trail the atalanta. If the esta caponise the gino then the gino caponise the esta. If something caponise the atalanta then it caponise the gino. If something trail the gino then the gino is crackers. If something is epochal and it trail the royal then it recycle the atalanta. If something recycle the esta then it is crackers. If something caponise the esta then the esta caponise the atalanta. The gino is hated.", "logic": "\nRecycle(atalanta, esta)\nRecycle(gino, atalanta)\nRecycle(royal, atalanta)\nRecycle(royal, esta)\nCaponise(royal, esta)\nEpochal(esta)\nHated(esta)\nTrail(atalanta, royal) -> Epochal(atalanta)\nforall x (Trail(x, esta) and Unselfish(x) -> Trail(esta, atalanta))\nCaponise(esta, gino) -> Caponise(gino, esta)\nforall x (Caponise(x, atalanta) -> Caponise(x, gino))\nforall x (Trail(x, gino) -> Crackers(gino))\nforall x (Epochal(x) and Trail(x, royal) -> Recycle(x, atalanta))\nforall x (Recycle(x, esta) -> Crackers(x))\nforall x (Caponise(x, esta) -> Caponise(esta, atalanta))\n\nHated(gino)\n\nHated(gino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The selby ration the kristien. The therese ration the selby. The jacynth ration the selby. The jacynth ration the kristien. The jacynth declassify the kristien. The kristien is cosy. The kristien is corporate. If the selby swirl the jacynth then the selby is cosy. If something swirl the kristien and it is poltroon then the kristien swirl the selby. If the kristien declassify the therese then the therese declassify the kristien. If something declassify the selby then it declassify the therese. If something swirl the therese then the therese is punitive. If something is cosy and it swirl the jacynth then it ration the selby. If something ration the kristien then it is punitive. If something declassify the kristien then the kristien declassify the selby. The selby does not visit the selby.", "logic": "\nRation(selby, kristien)\nRation(therese, selby)\nRation(jacynth, selby)\nRation(jacynth, kristien)\nDeclassify(jacynth, kristien)\nCosy(kristien)\nCorporate(kristien)\nSwirl(selby, jacynth) -> Cosy(selby)\nforall x (Swirl(x, kristien) and Poltroon(x) -> Swirl(kristien, selby))\nDeclassify(kristien, therese) -> Declassify(therese, kristien)\nforall x (Declassify(x, selby) -> Declassify(x, therese))\nforall x (Swirl(x, therese) -> Punitive(therese))\nforall x (Cosy(x) and Swirl(x, jacynth) -> Ration(x, selby))\nforall x (Ration(x, kristien) -> Punitive(x))\nforall x (Declassify(x, kristien) -> Declassify(kristien, selby))\n\nnot Declassify(selby, selby)\n\nnot Declassify(selby, selby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The lionello stimulate the tann. The deana stimulate the lionello. The jackie stimulate the lionello. The jackie stimulate the tann. The jackie outshout the tann. The tann is taxing. The tann is autonomic. If the lionello excruciate the jackie then the lionello is taxing. If something excruciate the tann and it is blithe then the tann excruciate the lionello. If the tann outshout the deana then the deana outshout the tann. If something outshout the lionello then it outshout the deana. If something excruciate the deana then the deana is dozen. If something is taxing and it excruciate the jackie then it stimulate the lionello. If something stimulate the tann then it is dozen. If something outshout the tann then the tann outshout the lionello. The deana excruciate the lionello.", "logic": "\nStimulate(lionello, tann)\nStimulate(deana, lionello)\nStimulate(jackie, lionello)\nStimulate(jackie, tann)\nOutshout(jackie, tann)\nTaxing(tann)\nAutonomic(tann)\nExcruciate(lionello, jackie) -> Taxing(lionello)\nforall x (Excruciate(x, tann) and Blithe(x) -> Excruciate(tann, lionello))\nOutshout(tann, deana) -> Outshout(deana, tann)\nforall x (Outshout(x, lionello) -> Outshout(x, deana))\nforall x (Excruciate(x, deana) -> Dozen(deana))\nforall x (Taxing(x) and Excruciate(x, jackie) -> Stimulate(x, lionello))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, tann) -> Dozen(x))\nforall x (Outshout(x, tann) -> Outshout(tann, lionello))\n\nExcruciate(deana, lionello)\n\nExcruciate(deana, lionello) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1337"} {"premises": "The oswell venture the julietta. The oswell is asat. The oswell is silver. The oswell is bounderish. The oswell is xxvii. The oswell cackel the julietta. The oswell satellite the julietta. The julietta venture the oswell. The julietta is asat. The julietta is unemployed. The julietta is silver. The julietta is bounderish. The julietta is not xxvii. The julietta does not like the oswell. The julietta does not need the oswell. If something cackel the oswell and it cackel the julietta then the oswell satellite the julietta. If the oswell is unemployed and the oswell venture the julietta then the oswell satellite the julietta. If something satellite the oswell and it is unemployed then it is bounderish. If something is unemployed then it does not chase the julietta. If something cackel the julietta and it is not unemployed then it satellite the oswell. If something is silver and xxvii then it does not chase the oswell. The julietta is silver.", "logic": "\nVenture(oswell, julietta)\nAsat(oswell)\nSilver(oswell)\nBounderish(oswell)\nXxvii(oswell)\nCackel(oswell, julietta)\nSatellite(oswell, julietta)\nVenture(julietta, oswell)\nAsat(julietta)\nUnemployed(julietta)\nSilver(julietta)\nBounderish(julietta)\nnot Xxvii(julietta)\nnot Cackel(julietta, oswell)\nnot Satellite(julietta, oswell)\nforall x (Cackel(x, oswell) and Cackel(x, julietta) -> Satellite(oswell, julietta))\nUnemployed(oswell) and Venture(oswell, julietta) -> Satellite(oswell, julietta)\nforall x (Satellite(x, oswell) and Unemployed(x) -> Bounderish(x))\nforall x (Unemployed(x) -> not Venture(x, julietta))\nforall x (Cackel(x, julietta) and not Unemployed(x) -> Satellite(x, oswell))\nforall x (Silver(x) and Xxvii(x) -> not Venture(x, oswell))\n\nSilver(julietta)\n\ntherefore Silver(julietta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "The robbyn contuse the englebert. The robbyn is incurvate. The robbyn is competent. The robbyn is patronymic. The robbyn is fabricated. The robbyn frank the englebert. The robbyn companion the englebert. The englebert contuse the robbyn. The englebert is incurvate. The englebert is encircled. The englebert is competent. The englebert is patronymic. The englebert is not fabricated. The englebert does not like the robbyn. The englebert does not need the robbyn. If something frank the robbyn and it frank the englebert then the robbyn companion the englebert. If the robbyn is encircled and the robbyn contuse the englebert then the robbyn companion the englebert. If something companion the robbyn and it is encircled then it is patronymic. If something is encircled then it does not chase the englebert. If something frank the englebert and it is not encircled then it companion the robbyn. If something is competent and fabricated then it does not chase the robbyn. The robbyn is not patronymic.", "logic": "\nContuse(robbyn, englebert)\nIncurvate(robbyn)\nCompetent(robbyn)\nPatronymic(robbyn)\nFabricated(robbyn)\nFrank(robbyn, englebert)\nCompanion(robbyn, englebert)\nContuse(englebert, robbyn)\nIncurvate(englebert)\nEncircled(englebert)\nCompetent(englebert)\nPatronymic(englebert)\nnot Fabricated(englebert)\nnot Frank(englebert, robbyn)\nnot Companion(englebert, robbyn)\nforall x (Frank(x, robbyn) and Frank(x, englebert) -> Companion(robbyn, englebert))\nEncircled(robbyn) and Contuse(robbyn, englebert) -> Companion(robbyn, englebert)\nforall x (Companion(x, robbyn) and Encircled(x) -> Patronymic(x))\nforall x (Encircled(x) -> not Contuse(x, englebert))\nforall x (Frank(x, englebert) and not Encircled(x) -> Companion(x, robbyn))\nforall x (Competent(x) and Fabricated(x) -> not Contuse(x, robbyn))\n\nnot Patronymic(robbyn)\n\ntherefore Patronymic(robbyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "The nora swathe the bertina. The nora is veined. The nora is cubistic. The nora is gravelly. The nora is unsubdued. The nora resurface the bertina. The nora feed the bertina. The bertina swathe the nora. The bertina is veined. The bertina is spattered. The bertina is cubistic. The bertina is gravelly. The bertina is not unsubdued. The bertina does not like the nora. The bertina does not need the nora. If something resurface the nora and it resurface the bertina then the nora feed the bertina. If the nora is spattered and the nora swathe the bertina then the nora feed the bertina. If something feed the nora and it is spattered then it is gravelly. If something is spattered then it does not chase the bertina. If something resurface the bertina and it is not spattered then it feed the nora. If something is cubistic and unsubdued then it does not chase the nora. The bertina does not chase the bertina.", "logic": "\nSwathe(nora, bertina)\nVeined(nora)\nCubistic(nora)\nGravelly(nora)\nUnsubdued(nora)\nResurface(nora, bertina)\nFeed(nora, bertina)\nSwathe(bertina, nora)\nVeined(bertina)\nSpattered(bertina)\nCubistic(bertina)\nGravelly(bertina)\nnot Unsubdued(bertina)\nnot Resurface(bertina, nora)\nnot Feed(bertina, nora)\nforall x (Resurface(x, nora) and Resurface(x, bertina) -> Feed(nora, bertina))\nSpattered(nora) and Swathe(nora, bertina) -> Feed(nora, bertina)\nforall x (Feed(x, nora) and Spattered(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Spattered(x) -> not Swathe(x, bertina))\nforall x (Resurface(x, bertina) and not Spattered(x) -> Feed(x, nora))\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Unsubdued(x) -> not Swathe(x, nora))\n\nnot Swathe(bertina, bertina)\n\nSpattered(bertina) and forall x (Spattered(x) -> not Swathe(x, bertina)) -> therefore not Swathe(bertina, bertina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "The katrinka treadle the loria. The katrinka is sapphic. The katrinka is hardcover. The katrinka is conformist. The katrinka is oldish. The katrinka perorate the loria. The katrinka sanitize the loria. The loria treadle the katrinka. The loria is sapphic. The loria is orthopedic. The loria is hardcover. The loria is conformist. The loria is not oldish. The loria does not like the katrinka. The loria does not need the katrinka. If something perorate the katrinka and it perorate the loria then the katrinka sanitize the loria. If the katrinka is orthopedic and the katrinka treadle the loria then the katrinka sanitize the loria. If something sanitize the katrinka and it is orthopedic then it is conformist. If something is orthopedic then it does not chase the loria. If something perorate the loria and it is not orthopedic then it sanitize the katrinka. If something is hardcover and oldish then it does not chase the katrinka. The katrinka treadle the katrinka.", "logic": "\nTreadle(katrinka, loria)\nSapphic(katrinka)\nHardcover(katrinka)\nConformist(katrinka)\nOldish(katrinka)\nPerorate(katrinka, loria)\nSanitize(katrinka, loria)\nTreadle(loria, katrinka)\nSapphic(loria)\nOrthopedic(loria)\nHardcover(loria)\nConformist(loria)\nnot Oldish(loria)\nnot Perorate(loria, katrinka)\nnot Sanitize(loria, katrinka)\nforall x (Perorate(x, katrinka) and Perorate(x, loria) -> Sanitize(katrinka, loria))\nOrthopedic(katrinka) and Treadle(katrinka, loria) -> Sanitize(katrinka, loria)\nforall x (Sanitize(x, katrinka) and Orthopedic(x) -> Conformist(x))\nforall x (Orthopedic(x) -> not Treadle(x, loria))\nforall x (Perorate(x, loria) and not Orthopedic(x) -> Sanitize(x, katrinka))\nforall x (Hardcover(x) and Oldish(x) -> not Treadle(x, katrinka))\n\nTreadle(katrinka, katrinka)\n\nHardcover(katrinka) and Oldish(katrinka) and forall x (Hardcover(x) and Oldish(x) -> not Treadle(x, katrinka)) -> therefore not Treadle(katrinka, katrinka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "The vern glory the patrik. The vern is shipshape. The vern is rummy. The vern is shut. The vern is irritated. The vern covenant the patrik. The vern diffuse the patrik. The patrik glory the vern. The patrik is shipshape. The patrik is burnished. The patrik is rummy. The patrik is shut. The patrik is not irritated. The patrik does not like the vern. The patrik does not need the vern. If something covenant the vern and it covenant the patrik then the vern diffuse the patrik. If the vern is burnished and the vern glory the patrik then the vern diffuse the patrik. If something diffuse the vern and it is burnished then it is shut. If something is burnished then it does not chase the patrik. If something covenant the patrik and it is not burnished then it diffuse the vern. If something is rummy and irritated then it does not chase the vern. The vern does not need the vern.", "logic": "\nGlory(vern, patrik)\nShipshape(vern)\nRummy(vern)\nShut(vern)\nIrritated(vern)\nCovenant(vern, patrik)\nDiffuse(vern, patrik)\nGlory(patrik, vern)\nShipshape(patrik)\nBurnished(patrik)\nRummy(patrik)\nShut(patrik)\nnot Irritated(patrik)\nnot Covenant(patrik, vern)\nnot Diffuse(patrik, vern)\nforall x (Covenant(x, vern) and Covenant(x, patrik) -> Diffuse(vern, patrik))\nBurnished(vern) and Glory(vern, patrik) -> Diffuse(vern, patrik)\nforall x (Diffuse(x, vern) and Burnished(x) -> Shut(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) -> not Glory(x, patrik))\nforall x (Covenant(x, patrik) and not Burnished(x) -> Diffuse(x, vern))\nforall x (Rummy(x) and Irritated(x) -> not Glory(x, vern))\n\nnot Diffuse(vern, vern)\n\nforall x (Covenant(x, patrik) and not Burnished(x) -> Diffuse(x, vern)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "The barnie scud the phelia. The barnie is stagnant. The barnie is nescient. The barnie is waggish. The barnie is unhearable. The barnie redact the phelia. The barnie rubbish the phelia. The phelia scud the barnie. The phelia is stagnant. The phelia is lipotropic. The phelia is nescient. The phelia is waggish. The phelia is not unhearable. The phelia does not like the barnie. The phelia does not need the barnie. If something redact the barnie and it redact the phelia then the barnie rubbish the phelia. If the barnie is lipotropic and the barnie scud the phelia then the barnie rubbish the phelia. If something rubbish the barnie and it is lipotropic then it is waggish. If something is lipotropic then it does not chase the phelia. If something redact the phelia and it is not lipotropic then it rubbish the barnie. If something is nescient and unhearable then it does not chase the barnie. The barnie redact the barnie.", "logic": "\nScud(barnie, phelia)\nStagnant(barnie)\nNescient(barnie)\nWaggish(barnie)\nUnhearable(barnie)\nRedact(barnie, phelia)\nRubbish(barnie, phelia)\nScud(phelia, barnie)\nStagnant(phelia)\nLipotropic(phelia)\nNescient(phelia)\nWaggish(phelia)\nnot Unhearable(phelia)\nnot Redact(phelia, barnie)\nnot Rubbish(phelia, barnie)\nforall x (Redact(x, barnie) and Redact(x, phelia) -> Rubbish(barnie, phelia))\nLipotropic(barnie) and Scud(barnie, phelia) -> Rubbish(barnie, phelia)\nforall x (Rubbish(x, barnie) and Lipotropic(x) -> Waggish(x))\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) -> not Scud(x, phelia))\nforall x (Redact(x, phelia) and not Lipotropic(x) -> Rubbish(x, barnie))\nforall x (Nescient(x) and Unhearable(x) -> not Scud(x, barnie))\n\nRedact(barnie, barnie)\n\nRedact(barnie, barnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "The will underspend the ware. The will is normative. The will is spanking. The will is unendowed. The will is cooked. The will intercept the ware. The will grease the ware. The ware underspend the will. The ware is normative. The ware is omnibus. The ware is spanking. The ware is unendowed. The ware is not cooked. The ware does not like the will. The ware does not need the will. If something intercept the will and it intercept the ware then the will grease the ware. If the will is omnibus and the will underspend the ware then the will grease the ware. If something grease the will and it is omnibus then it is unendowed. If something is omnibus then it does not chase the ware. If something intercept the ware and it is not omnibus then it grease the will. If something is spanking and cooked then it does not chase the will. The ware does not like the ware.", "logic": "\nUnderspend(will, ware)\nNormative(will)\nSpanking(will)\nUnendowed(will)\nCooked(will)\nIntercept(will, ware)\nGrease(will, ware)\nUnderspend(ware, will)\nNormative(ware)\nOmnibus(ware)\nSpanking(ware)\nUnendowed(ware)\nnot Cooked(ware)\nnot Intercept(ware, will)\nnot Grease(ware, will)\nforall x (Intercept(x, will) and Intercept(x, ware) -> Grease(will, ware))\nOmnibus(will) and Underspend(will, ware) -> Grease(will, ware)\nforall x (Grease(x, will) and Omnibus(x) -> Unendowed(x))\nforall x (Omnibus(x) -> not Underspend(x, ware))\nforall x (Intercept(x, ware) and not Omnibus(x) -> Grease(x, will))\nforall x (Spanking(x) and Cooked(x) -> not Underspend(x, will))\n\nnot Intercept(ware, ware)\n\nnot Intercept(ware, ware) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "The fulton fluff the gabbi. The fulton is monophonic. The fulton is sane. The fulton is limiting. The fulton is bantam. The fulton hoover the gabbi. The fulton alight the gabbi. The gabbi fluff the fulton. The gabbi is monophonic. The gabbi is palmatifid. The gabbi is sane. The gabbi is limiting. The gabbi is not bantam. The gabbi does not like the fulton. The gabbi does not need the fulton. If something hoover the fulton and it hoover the gabbi then the fulton alight the gabbi. If the fulton is palmatifid and the fulton fluff the gabbi then the fulton alight the gabbi. If something alight the fulton and it is palmatifid then it is limiting. If something is palmatifid then it does not chase the gabbi. If something hoover the gabbi and it is not palmatifid then it alight the fulton. If something is sane and bantam then it does not chase the fulton. The gabbi alight the gabbi.", "logic": "\nFluff(fulton, gabbi)\nMonophonic(fulton)\nSane(fulton)\nLimiting(fulton)\nBantam(fulton)\nHoover(fulton, gabbi)\nAlight(fulton, gabbi)\nFluff(gabbi, fulton)\nMonophonic(gabbi)\nPalmatifid(gabbi)\nSane(gabbi)\nLimiting(gabbi)\nnot Bantam(gabbi)\nnot Hoover(gabbi, fulton)\nnot Alight(gabbi, fulton)\nforall x (Hoover(x, fulton) and Hoover(x, gabbi) -> Alight(fulton, gabbi))\nPalmatifid(fulton) and Fluff(fulton, gabbi) -> Alight(fulton, gabbi)\nforall x (Alight(x, fulton) and Palmatifid(x) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Palmatifid(x) -> not Fluff(x, gabbi))\nforall x (Hoover(x, gabbi) and not Palmatifid(x) -> Alight(x, fulton))\nforall x (Sane(x) and Bantam(x) -> not Fluff(x, fulton))\n\nAlight(gabbi, gabbi)\n\nAlight(gabbi, gabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2905"} {"premises": "Suzann is headless. Young people are stocked. If someone is stocked and not bestial then they are headless. If someone is bestial and not reigning then they are not ridged. If Suzann is not headless then Suzann is bottom. If someone is dorian then they are bottom. If someone is headless and not stocked then they are dorian. If someone is stocked and not headless then they are dorian. Green, bestial people are dorian. Suzann is headless.", "logic": "\nHeadless(suzann)\nforall x (Bestial(x) -> Stocked(x))\nforall x (Stocked(x) and not Bestial(x) -> Headless(x))\nforall x (Bestial(x) and not Reigning(x) -> not Ridged(x))\nnot Headless(suzann) -> Bottom(suzann)\nforall x (Dorian(x) -> Bottom(x))\nforall x (Headless(x) and not Stocked(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Stocked(x) and not Headless(x) -> Dorian(x))\nforall x (Reigning(x) and Bestial(x) -> Dorian(x))\n\nHeadless(suzann)\n\ntherefore Headless(suzann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "Helise is wesleyan. Young people are agonal. If someone is agonal and not spouting then they are wesleyan. If someone is spouting and not meager then they are not diurnal. If Helise is not wesleyan then Helise is stitched. If someone is lilac then they are stitched. If someone is wesleyan and not agonal then they are lilac. If someone is agonal and not wesleyan then they are lilac. Green, spouting people are lilac. Helise is not wesleyan.", "logic": "\nWesleyan(helise)\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Agonal(x))\nforall x (Agonal(x) and not Spouting(x) -> Wesleyan(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) and not Meager(x) -> not Diurnal(x))\nnot Wesleyan(helise) -> Stitched(helise)\nforall x (Lilac(x) -> Stitched(x))\nforall x (Wesleyan(x) and not Agonal(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Agonal(x) and not Wesleyan(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) and Spouting(x) -> Lilac(x))\n\nnot Wesleyan(helise)\n\ntherefore Wesleyan(helise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "Daniele is cankerous. Young people are unfeasible. If someone is unfeasible and not covariant then they are cankerous. If someone is covariant and not guileless then they are not tensile. If Daniele is not cankerous then Daniele is miscible. If someone is unkind then they are miscible. If someone is cankerous and not unfeasible then they are unkind. If someone is unfeasible and not cankerous then they are unkind. Green, covariant people are unkind. Daniele is not unkind.", "logic": "\nCankerous(daniele)\nforall x (Covariant(x) -> Unfeasible(x))\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) and not Covariant(x) -> Cankerous(x))\nforall x (Covariant(x) and not Guileless(x) -> not Tensile(x))\nnot Cankerous(daniele) -> Miscible(daniele)\nforall x (Unkind(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Cankerous(x) and not Unfeasible(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Unfeasible(x) and not Cankerous(x) -> Unkind(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) and Covariant(x) -> Unkind(x))\n\nnot Unkind(daniele)\n\nforall x (Cankerous(x) and not Unfeasible(x) -> Unkind(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "Harlene is earned. Young people are atrophied. If someone is atrophied and not ungroomed then they are earned. If someone is ungroomed and not active then they are not puritanic. If Harlene is not earned then Harlene is relieved. If someone is carbonyl then they are relieved. If someone is earned and not atrophied then they are carbonyl. If someone is atrophied and not earned then they are carbonyl. Green, ungroomed people are carbonyl. Harlene is ungroomed.", "logic": "\nEarned(harlene)\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and not Ungroomed(x) -> Earned(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) and not Active(x) -> not Puritanic(x))\nnot Earned(harlene) -> Relieved(harlene)\nforall x (Carbonyl(x) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Earned(x) and not Atrophied(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and not Earned(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\nforall x (Active(x) and Ungroomed(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\n\nUngroomed(harlene)\n\nUngroomed(harlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5104"} {"premises": "Enid is echoing. Worth is dignified. Maryjo is not echoing. Cold, echoing people are ostensive. All starry people are raised. Enid is echoing.", "logic": "\nEchoing(enid)\nDignified(worth)\nnot Echoing(maryjo)\nforall x (Raised(x) and Echoing(x) -> Ostensive(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Raised(x))\n\nEchoing(enid)\n\ntherefore Echoing(enid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5861"} {"premises": "Beck is mute. Ulrike is thriftless. Louis is not mute. Cold, mute people are unbuttoned. All oily people are malevolent. Ulrike is not thriftless.", "logic": "\nMute(beck)\nThriftless(ulrike)\nnot Mute(louis)\nforall x (Malevolent(x) and Mute(x) -> Unbuttoned(x))\nforall x (Oily(x) -> Malevolent(x))\n\nnot Thriftless(ulrike)\n\ntherefore Thriftless(ulrike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5861"} {"premises": "Jory is underdone. Wylma is endergonic. Marylinda is not underdone. Cold, underdone people are fatheaded. All organized people are cowled. Jory is not fatheaded.", "logic": "\nUnderdone(jory)\nEndergonic(wylma)\nnot Underdone(marylinda)\nforall x (Cowled(x) and Underdone(x) -> Fatheaded(x))\nforall x (Organized(x) -> Cowled(x))\n\nnot Fatheaded(jory)\n\nforall x (Cowled(x) and Underdone(x) -> Fatheaded(x)) <- forall x (Organized(x) -> Cowled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5861"} {"premises": "Cathie is reusable. Lyndell is ecumenic. Beverlie is not reusable. Cold, reusable people are formulary. All unportable people are cloaked. Cathie is furry.", "logic": "\nReusable(cathie)\nEcumenic(lyndell)\nnot Reusable(beverlie)\nforall x (Cloaked(x) and Reusable(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Unportable(x) -> Cloaked(x))\n\nFurry(cathie)\n\nFurry(cathie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5861"} {"premises": "Reeva is brachiopod. Reeva is not semiannual. Reeva is makeshift. Reeva is not skanky. Reeva is not bulbaceous. Reeva is not acidic. Rosemaria is bulbaceous. Rosemaria is acidic. Rosemaria is oxonian. Cherri is not brachiopod. Cherri is bulbaceous. Cherri is oxonian. Franny is brachiopod. Franny is makeshift. Franny is not acidic. Franny is not oxonian. If Cherri is brachiopod then Cherri is makeshift. If something is brachiopod and acidic then it is not oxonian. Rosemaria is acidic.", "logic": "\nBrachiopod(reeva)\nnot Semiannual(reeva)\nMakeshift(reeva)\nnot Skanky(reeva)\nnot Bulbaceous(reeva)\nnot Acidic(reeva)\nBulbaceous(rosemaria)\nAcidic(rosemaria)\nOxonian(rosemaria)\nnot Brachiopod(cherri)\nBulbaceous(cherri)\nOxonian(cherri)\nBrachiopod(franny)\nMakeshift(franny)\nnot Acidic(franny)\nnot Oxonian(franny)\nBrachiopod(cherri) -> Makeshift(cherri)\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) and Acidic(x) -> not Oxonian(x))\n\nAcidic(rosemaria)\n\ntherefore Acidic(rosemaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7090"} {"premises": "Chelsea is mutagenic. Chelsea is not nonpublic. Chelsea is allopathic. Chelsea is not greyed. Chelsea is not blame. Chelsea is not bareback. Manny is blame. Manny is bareback. Manny is textile. Leonelle is not mutagenic. Leonelle is blame. Leonelle is textile. Charisse is mutagenic. Charisse is allopathic. Charisse is not bareback. Charisse is not textile. If Leonelle is mutagenic then Leonelle is allopathic. If something is mutagenic and bareback then it is not textile. Chelsea is bareback.", "logic": "\nMutagenic(chelsea)\nnot Nonpublic(chelsea)\nAllopathic(chelsea)\nnot Greyed(chelsea)\nnot Blame(chelsea)\nnot Bareback(chelsea)\nBlame(manny)\nBareback(manny)\nTextile(manny)\nnot Mutagenic(leonelle)\nBlame(leonelle)\nTextile(leonelle)\nMutagenic(charisse)\nAllopathic(charisse)\nnot Bareback(charisse)\nnot Textile(charisse)\nMutagenic(leonelle) -> Allopathic(leonelle)\nforall x (Mutagenic(x) and Bareback(x) -> not Textile(x))\n\nBareback(chelsea)\n\ntherefore not Bareback(chelsea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7090"} {"premises": "Joletta is vulgar. Joletta is not tasmanian. Joletta is lanate. Joletta is not individual. Joletta is not legible. Joletta is not paschal. Nicolle is legible. Nicolle is paschal. Nicolle is sweltry. Minetta is not vulgar. Minetta is legible. Minetta is sweltry. Greg is vulgar. Greg is lanate. Greg is not paschal. Greg is not sweltry. If Minetta is vulgar then Minetta is lanate. If something is vulgar and paschal then it is not sweltry. Minetta is not lanate.", "logic": "\nVulgar(joletta)\nnot Tasmanian(joletta)\nLanate(joletta)\nnot Individual(joletta)\nnot Legible(joletta)\nnot Paschal(joletta)\nLegible(nicolle)\nPaschal(nicolle)\nSweltry(nicolle)\nnot Vulgar(minetta)\nLegible(minetta)\nSweltry(minetta)\nVulgar(greg)\nLanate(greg)\nnot Paschal(greg)\nnot Sweltry(greg)\nVulgar(minetta) -> Lanate(minetta)\nforall x (Vulgar(x) and Paschal(x) -> not Sweltry(x))\n\nnot Lanate(minetta)\n\nVulgar(minetta) -> Lanate(minetta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7090"} {"premises": "Adrien is atomic. Adrien is not pricy. Adrien is cultivable. Adrien is not shakeable. Adrien is not optimistic. Adrien is not ethiopian. Georges is optimistic. Georges is ethiopian. Georges is halfway. Biddy is not atomic. Biddy is optimistic. Biddy is halfway. Rinaldo is atomic. Rinaldo is cultivable. Rinaldo is not ethiopian. Rinaldo is not halfway. If Biddy is atomic then Biddy is cultivable. If something is atomic and ethiopian then it is not halfway. Rinaldo is optimistic.", "logic": "\nAtomic(adrien)\nnot Pricy(adrien)\nCultivable(adrien)\nnot Shakeable(adrien)\nnot Optimistic(adrien)\nnot Ethiopian(adrien)\nOptimistic(georges)\nEthiopian(georges)\nHalfway(georges)\nnot Atomic(biddy)\nOptimistic(biddy)\nHalfway(biddy)\nAtomic(rinaldo)\nCultivable(rinaldo)\nnot Ethiopian(rinaldo)\nnot Halfway(rinaldo)\nAtomic(biddy) -> Cultivable(biddy)\nforall x (Atomic(x) and Ethiopian(x) -> not Halfway(x))\n\nOptimistic(rinaldo)\n\nOptimistic(rinaldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-7090"} {"premises": "The kathleen confute the carmelina. The kathleen confute the jory. The kathleen is not bookable. The kathleen defame the jory. The carmelina confute the kathleen. The carmelina confute the jory. The carmelina is torrid. The carmelina is tautologic. The carmelina fuel the kathleen. The carmelina fuel the jory. The jory confute the carmelina. The jory is not bookable. The jory is torrid. The jory defame the kathleen. The jory fuel the kathleen. If someone is torrid then they need the jory. If someone fuel the kathleen and the kathleen fuel the jory then the jory defame the carmelina. If someone confute the kathleen then they like the carmelina. If someone fuel the kathleen then they are torrid. If someone confute the carmelina and the carmelina confute the kathleen then the kathleen is torrid. If someone is torrid and they do not eat the carmelina then they like the jory. If someone is bookable and they eat the kathleen then they are honduran. If the jory confute the kathleen then the kathleen does not like the jory. The kathleen is not bookable.", "logic": "\nConfute(kathleen, carmelina)\nConfute(kathleen, jory)\nnot Bookable(kathleen)\nDefame(kathleen, jory)\nConfute(carmelina, kathleen)\nConfute(carmelina, jory)\nTorrid(carmelina)\nTautologic(carmelina)\nFuel(carmelina, kathleen)\nFuel(carmelina, jory)\nConfute(jory, carmelina)\nnot Bookable(jory)\nTorrid(jory)\nDefame(jory, kathleen)\nFuel(jory, kathleen)\nforall x (Torrid(x) -> Fuel(x, jory))\nforall x (Fuel(x, kathleen) and Fuel(kathleen, jory) -> Defame(jory, carmelina))\nforall x (Confute(x, kathleen) -> Defame(x, carmelina))\nforall x (Fuel(x, kathleen) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Confute(x, carmelina) and Confute(carmelina, kathleen) -> Torrid(kathleen))\nforall x (Torrid(x) and not Confute(x, carmelina) -> Defame(x, jory))\nforall x (Bookable(x) and Confute(x, kathleen) -> Honduran(x))\nConfute(jory, kathleen) -> not Defame(kathleen, jory)\n\nnot Bookable(kathleen)\n\ntherefore not Bookable(kathleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The jocelyne divine the roseanna. The jocelyne divine the dorisa. The jocelyne is not unshaded. The jocelyne pant the dorisa. The roseanna divine the jocelyne. The roseanna divine the dorisa. The roseanna is merry. The roseanna is adaptable. The roseanna uncase the jocelyne. The roseanna uncase the dorisa. The dorisa divine the roseanna. The dorisa is not unshaded. The dorisa is merry. The dorisa pant the jocelyne. The dorisa uncase the jocelyne. If someone is merry then they need the dorisa. If someone uncase the jocelyne and the jocelyne uncase the dorisa then the dorisa pant the roseanna. If someone divine the jocelyne then they like the roseanna. If someone uncase the jocelyne then they are merry. If someone divine the roseanna and the roseanna divine the jocelyne then the jocelyne is merry. If someone is merry and they do not eat the roseanna then they like the dorisa. If someone is unshaded and they eat the jocelyne then they are streaming. If the dorisa divine the jocelyne then the jocelyne does not like the dorisa. The roseanna is not merry.", "logic": "\nDivine(jocelyne, roseanna)\nDivine(jocelyne, dorisa)\nnot Unshaded(jocelyne)\nPant(jocelyne, dorisa)\nDivine(roseanna, jocelyne)\nDivine(roseanna, dorisa)\nMerry(roseanna)\nAdaptable(roseanna)\nUncase(roseanna, jocelyne)\nUncase(roseanna, dorisa)\nDivine(dorisa, roseanna)\nnot Unshaded(dorisa)\nMerry(dorisa)\nPant(dorisa, jocelyne)\nUncase(dorisa, jocelyne)\nforall x (Merry(x) -> Uncase(x, dorisa))\nforall x (Uncase(x, jocelyne) and Uncase(jocelyne, dorisa) -> Pant(dorisa, roseanna))\nforall x (Divine(x, jocelyne) -> Pant(x, roseanna))\nforall x (Uncase(x, jocelyne) -> Merry(x))\nforall x (Divine(x, roseanna) and Divine(roseanna, jocelyne) -> Merry(jocelyne))\nforall x (Merry(x) and not Divine(x, roseanna) -> Pant(x, dorisa))\nforall x (Unshaded(x) and Divine(x, jocelyne) -> Streaming(x))\nDivine(dorisa, jocelyne) -> not Pant(jocelyne, dorisa)\n\nnot Merry(roseanna)\n\ntherefore Merry(roseanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The arnoldo mass the vernor. The arnoldo mass the elisabeth. The arnoldo is not unaccented. The arnoldo convoke the elisabeth. The vernor mass the arnoldo. The vernor mass the elisabeth. The vernor is undefeated. The vernor is uptight. The vernor globalize the arnoldo. The vernor globalize the elisabeth. The elisabeth mass the vernor. The elisabeth is not unaccented. The elisabeth is undefeated. The elisabeth convoke the arnoldo. The elisabeth globalize the arnoldo. If someone is undefeated then they need the elisabeth. If someone globalize the arnoldo and the arnoldo globalize the elisabeth then the elisabeth convoke the vernor. If someone mass the arnoldo then they like the vernor. If someone globalize the arnoldo then they are undefeated. If someone mass the vernor and the vernor mass the arnoldo then the arnoldo is undefeated. If someone is undefeated and they do not eat the vernor then they like the elisabeth. If someone is unaccented and they eat the arnoldo then they are flattering. If the elisabeth mass the arnoldo then the arnoldo does not like the elisabeth. The vernor convoke the vernor.", "logic": "\nMass(arnoldo, vernor)\nMass(arnoldo, elisabeth)\nnot Unaccented(arnoldo)\nConvoke(arnoldo, elisabeth)\nMass(vernor, arnoldo)\nMass(vernor, elisabeth)\nUndefeated(vernor)\nUptight(vernor)\nGlobalize(vernor, arnoldo)\nGlobalize(vernor, elisabeth)\nMass(elisabeth, vernor)\nnot Unaccented(elisabeth)\nUndefeated(elisabeth)\nConvoke(elisabeth, arnoldo)\nGlobalize(elisabeth, arnoldo)\nforall x (Undefeated(x) -> Globalize(x, elisabeth))\nforall x (Globalize(x, arnoldo) and Globalize(arnoldo, elisabeth) -> Convoke(elisabeth, vernor))\nforall x (Mass(x, arnoldo) -> Convoke(x, vernor))\nforall x (Globalize(x, arnoldo) -> Undefeated(x))\nforall x (Mass(x, vernor) and Mass(vernor, arnoldo) -> Undefeated(arnoldo))\nforall x (Undefeated(x) and not Mass(x, vernor) -> Convoke(x, elisabeth))\nforall x (Unaccented(x) and Mass(x, arnoldo) -> Flattering(x))\nMass(elisabeth, arnoldo) -> not Convoke(arnoldo, elisabeth)\n\nConvoke(vernor, vernor)\n\nMass(vernor, arnoldo) and forall x (Mass(x, arnoldo) -> Convoke(x, vernor)) -> therefore Convoke(vernor, vernor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The samuela shame the matilda. The samuela shame the sylvie. The samuela is not brusk. The samuela browse the sylvie. The matilda shame the samuela. The matilda shame the sylvie. The matilda is unlaureled. The matilda is apogametic. The matilda practise the samuela. The matilda practise the sylvie. The sylvie shame the matilda. The sylvie is not brusk. The sylvie is unlaureled. The sylvie browse the samuela. The sylvie practise the samuela. If someone is unlaureled then they need the sylvie. If someone practise the samuela and the samuela practise the sylvie then the sylvie browse the matilda. If someone shame the samuela then they like the matilda. If someone practise the samuela then they are unlaureled. If someone shame the matilda and the matilda shame the samuela then the samuela is unlaureled. If someone is unlaureled and they do not eat the matilda then they like the sylvie. If someone is brusk and they eat the samuela then they are parlous. If the sylvie shame the samuela then the samuela does not like the sylvie. The sylvie does not need the sylvie.", "logic": "\nShame(samuela, matilda)\nShame(samuela, sylvie)\nnot Brusk(samuela)\nBrowse(samuela, sylvie)\nShame(matilda, samuela)\nShame(matilda, sylvie)\nUnlaureled(matilda)\nApogametic(matilda)\nPractise(matilda, samuela)\nPractise(matilda, sylvie)\nShame(sylvie, matilda)\nnot Brusk(sylvie)\nUnlaureled(sylvie)\nBrowse(sylvie, samuela)\nPractise(sylvie, samuela)\nforall x (Unlaureled(x) -> Practise(x, sylvie))\nforall x (Practise(x, samuela) and Practise(samuela, sylvie) -> Browse(sylvie, matilda))\nforall x (Shame(x, samuela) -> Browse(x, matilda))\nforall x (Practise(x, samuela) -> Unlaureled(x))\nforall x (Shame(x, matilda) and Shame(matilda, samuela) -> Unlaureled(samuela))\nforall x (Unlaureled(x) and not Shame(x, matilda) -> Browse(x, sylvie))\nforall x (Brusk(x) and Shame(x, samuela) -> Parlous(x))\nShame(sylvie, samuela) -> not Browse(samuela, sylvie)\n\nnot Practise(sylvie, sylvie)\n\nUnlaureled(sylvie) and forall x (Unlaureled(x) -> Practise(x, sylvie)) -> therefore Practise(sylvie, sylvie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The marielle inclose the waverly. The marielle inclose the margareta. The marielle is not bland. The marielle embroil the margareta. The waverly inclose the marielle. The waverly inclose the margareta. The waverly is dickey. The waverly is carbonous. The waverly ting the marielle. The waverly ting the margareta. The margareta inclose the waverly. The margareta is not bland. The margareta is dickey. The margareta embroil the marielle. The margareta ting the marielle. If someone is dickey then they need the margareta. If someone ting the marielle and the marielle ting the margareta then the margareta embroil the waverly. If someone inclose the marielle then they like the waverly. If someone ting the marielle then they are dickey. If someone inclose the waverly and the waverly inclose the marielle then the marielle is dickey. If someone is dickey and they do not eat the waverly then they like the margareta. If someone is bland and they eat the marielle then they are tomentose. If the margareta inclose the marielle then the marielle does not like the margareta. The marielle ting the margareta.", "logic": "\nInclose(marielle, waverly)\nInclose(marielle, margareta)\nnot Bland(marielle)\nEmbroil(marielle, margareta)\nInclose(waverly, marielle)\nInclose(waverly, margareta)\nDickey(waverly)\nCarbonous(waverly)\nTing(waverly, marielle)\nTing(waverly, margareta)\nInclose(margareta, waverly)\nnot Bland(margareta)\nDickey(margareta)\nEmbroil(margareta, marielle)\nTing(margareta, marielle)\nforall x (Dickey(x) -> Ting(x, margareta))\nforall x (Ting(x, marielle) and Ting(marielle, margareta) -> Embroil(margareta, waverly))\nforall x (Inclose(x, marielle) -> Embroil(x, waverly))\nforall x (Ting(x, marielle) -> Dickey(x))\nforall x (Inclose(x, waverly) and Inclose(waverly, marielle) -> Dickey(marielle))\nforall x (Dickey(x) and not Inclose(x, waverly) -> Embroil(x, margareta))\nforall x (Bland(x) and Inclose(x, marielle) -> Tomentose(x))\nInclose(margareta, marielle) -> not Embroil(marielle, margareta)\n\nTing(marielle, margareta)\n\nInclose(marielle, waverly) and Inclose(waverly, marielle) and forall x (Inclose(x, waverly) and Inclose(waverly, marielle) -> Dickey(marielle)) -> therefore Dickey(marielle) Dickey(marielle) and forall x (Dickey(x) -> Ting(x, margareta)) -> therefore Ting(marielle, margareta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The sacha asphyxiate the broddie. The sacha asphyxiate the michel. The sacha is not soigne. The sacha scallop the michel. The broddie asphyxiate the sacha. The broddie asphyxiate the michel. The broddie is maxi. The broddie is level. The broddie gluttonize the sacha. The broddie gluttonize the michel. The michel asphyxiate the broddie. The michel is not soigne. The michel is maxi. The michel scallop the sacha. The michel gluttonize the sacha. If someone is maxi then they need the michel. If someone gluttonize the sacha and the sacha gluttonize the michel then the michel scallop the broddie. If someone asphyxiate the sacha then they like the broddie. If someone gluttonize the sacha then they are maxi. If someone asphyxiate the broddie and the broddie asphyxiate the sacha then the sacha is maxi. If someone is maxi and they do not eat the broddie then they like the michel. If someone is soigne and they eat the sacha then they are wriggly. If the michel asphyxiate the sacha then the sacha does not like the michel. The sacha does not need the michel.", "logic": "\nAsphyxiate(sacha, broddie)\nAsphyxiate(sacha, michel)\nnot Soigne(sacha)\nScallop(sacha, michel)\nAsphyxiate(broddie, sacha)\nAsphyxiate(broddie, michel)\nMaxi(broddie)\nLevel(broddie)\nGluttonize(broddie, sacha)\nGluttonize(broddie, michel)\nAsphyxiate(michel, broddie)\nnot Soigne(michel)\nMaxi(michel)\nScallop(michel, sacha)\nGluttonize(michel, sacha)\nforall x (Maxi(x) -> Gluttonize(x, michel))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, sacha) and Gluttonize(sacha, michel) -> Scallop(michel, broddie))\nforall x (Asphyxiate(x, sacha) -> Scallop(x, broddie))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, sacha) -> Maxi(x))\nforall x (Asphyxiate(x, broddie) and Asphyxiate(broddie, sacha) -> Maxi(sacha))\nforall x (Maxi(x) and not Asphyxiate(x, broddie) -> Scallop(x, michel))\nforall x (Soigne(x) and Asphyxiate(x, sacha) -> Wriggly(x))\nAsphyxiate(michel, sacha) -> not Scallop(sacha, michel)\n\nnot Gluttonize(sacha, michel)\n\nAsphyxiate(sacha, broddie) and Asphyxiate(broddie, sacha) and forall x (Asphyxiate(x, broddie) and Asphyxiate(broddie, sacha) -> Maxi(sacha)) -> therefore Maxi(sacha) Maxi(sacha) and forall x (Maxi(x) -> Gluttonize(x, michel)) -> therefore Gluttonize(sacha, michel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The nevil hump the laurena. The nevil hump the delaney. The nevil is not extrovert. The nevil duplicate the delaney. The laurena hump the nevil. The laurena hump the delaney. The laurena is azonal. The laurena is aflame. The laurena plunder the nevil. The laurena plunder the delaney. The delaney hump the laurena. The delaney is not extrovert. The delaney is azonal. The delaney duplicate the nevil. The delaney plunder the nevil. If someone is azonal then they need the delaney. If someone plunder the nevil and the nevil plunder the delaney then the delaney duplicate the laurena. If someone hump the nevil then they like the laurena. If someone plunder the nevil then they are azonal. If someone hump the laurena and the laurena hump the nevil then the nevil is azonal. If someone is azonal and they do not eat the laurena then they like the delaney. If someone is extrovert and they eat the nevil then they are uncreative. If the delaney hump the nevil then the nevil does not like the delaney. The delaney duplicate the laurena.", "logic": "\nHump(nevil, laurena)\nHump(nevil, delaney)\nnot Extrovert(nevil)\nDuplicate(nevil, delaney)\nHump(laurena, nevil)\nHump(laurena, delaney)\nAzonal(laurena)\nAflame(laurena)\nPlunder(laurena, nevil)\nPlunder(laurena, delaney)\nHump(delaney, laurena)\nnot Extrovert(delaney)\nAzonal(delaney)\nDuplicate(delaney, nevil)\nPlunder(delaney, nevil)\nforall x (Azonal(x) -> Plunder(x, delaney))\nforall x (Plunder(x, nevil) and Plunder(nevil, delaney) -> Duplicate(delaney, laurena))\nforall x (Hump(x, nevil) -> Duplicate(x, laurena))\nforall x (Plunder(x, nevil) -> Azonal(x))\nforall x (Hump(x, laurena) and Hump(laurena, nevil) -> Azonal(nevil))\nforall x (Azonal(x) and not Hump(x, laurena) -> Duplicate(x, delaney))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) and Hump(x, nevil) -> Uncreative(x))\nHump(delaney, nevil) -> not Duplicate(nevil, delaney)\n\nDuplicate(delaney, laurena)\n\nHump(nevil, laurena) and Hump(laurena, nevil) and forall x (Hump(x, laurena) and Hump(laurena, nevil) -> Azonal(nevil)) -> therefore Azonal(nevil) Azonal(nevil) and forall x (Azonal(x) -> Plunder(x, delaney)) -> therefore Plunder(nevil, delaney) Plunder(delaney, nevil) and Plunder(nevil, delaney) and forall x (Plunder(x, nevil) and Plunder(nevil, delaney) -> Duplicate(delaney, laurena)) -> therefore Duplicate(delaney, laurena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The jordan litigate the marion. The jordan litigate the shela. The jordan is not cerebellar. The jordan fructify the shela. The marion litigate the jordan. The marion litigate the shela. The marion is alacritous. The marion is vindictive. The marion transship the jordan. The marion transship the shela. The shela litigate the marion. The shela is not cerebellar. The shela is alacritous. The shela fructify the jordan. The shela transship the jordan. If someone is alacritous then they need the shela. If someone transship the jordan and the jordan transship the shela then the shela fructify the marion. If someone litigate the jordan then they like the marion. If someone transship the jordan then they are alacritous. If someone litigate the marion and the marion litigate the jordan then the jordan is alacritous. If someone is alacritous and they do not eat the marion then they like the shela. If someone is cerebellar and they eat the jordan then they are scrotal. If the shela litigate the jordan then the jordan does not like the shela. The shela does not like the marion.", "logic": "\nLitigate(jordan, marion)\nLitigate(jordan, shela)\nnot Cerebellar(jordan)\nFructify(jordan, shela)\nLitigate(marion, jordan)\nLitigate(marion, shela)\nAlacritous(marion)\nVindictive(marion)\nTransship(marion, jordan)\nTransship(marion, shela)\nLitigate(shela, marion)\nnot Cerebellar(shela)\nAlacritous(shela)\nFructify(shela, jordan)\nTransship(shela, jordan)\nforall x (Alacritous(x) -> Transship(x, shela))\nforall x (Transship(x, jordan) and Transship(jordan, shela) -> Fructify(shela, marion))\nforall x (Litigate(x, jordan) -> Fructify(x, marion))\nforall x (Transship(x, jordan) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Litigate(x, marion) and Litigate(marion, jordan) -> Alacritous(jordan))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) and not Litigate(x, marion) -> Fructify(x, shela))\nforall x (Cerebellar(x) and Litigate(x, jordan) -> Scrotal(x))\nLitigate(shela, jordan) -> not Fructify(jordan, shela)\n\nnot Fructify(shela, marion)\n\nLitigate(jordan, marion) and Litigate(marion, jordan) and forall x (Litigate(x, marion) and Litigate(marion, jordan) -> Alacritous(jordan)) -> therefore Alacritous(jordan) Alacritous(jordan) and forall x (Alacritous(x) -> Transship(x, shela)) -> therefore Transship(jordan, shela) Transship(shela, jordan) and Transship(jordan, shela) and forall x (Transship(x, jordan) and Transship(jordan, shela) -> Fructify(shela, marion)) -> therefore Fructify(shela, marion)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The bea behold the evita. The bea behold the rahul. The bea is not quechuan. The bea outride the rahul. The evita behold the bea. The evita behold the rahul. The evita is euphonous. The evita is earnest. The evita tone the bea. The evita tone the rahul. The rahul behold the evita. The rahul is not quechuan. The rahul is euphonous. The rahul outride the bea. The rahul tone the bea. If someone is euphonous then they need the rahul. If someone tone the bea and the bea tone the rahul then the rahul outride the evita. If someone behold the bea then they like the evita. If someone tone the bea then they are euphonous. If someone behold the evita and the evita behold the bea then the bea is euphonous. If someone is euphonous and they do not eat the evita then they like the rahul. If someone is quechuan and they eat the bea then they are rustless. If the rahul behold the bea then the bea does not like the rahul. The evita does not like the rahul.", "logic": "\nBehold(bea, evita)\nBehold(bea, rahul)\nnot Quechuan(bea)\nOutride(bea, rahul)\nBehold(evita, bea)\nBehold(evita, rahul)\nEuphonous(evita)\nEarnest(evita)\nTone(evita, bea)\nTone(evita, rahul)\nBehold(rahul, evita)\nnot Quechuan(rahul)\nEuphonous(rahul)\nOutride(rahul, bea)\nTone(rahul, bea)\nforall x (Euphonous(x) -> Tone(x, rahul))\nforall x (Tone(x, bea) and Tone(bea, rahul) -> Outride(rahul, evita))\nforall x (Behold(x, bea) -> Outride(x, evita))\nforall x (Tone(x, bea) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Behold(x, evita) and Behold(evita, bea) -> Euphonous(bea))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and not Behold(x, evita) -> Outride(x, rahul))\nforall x (Quechuan(x) and Behold(x, bea) -> Rustless(x))\nBehold(rahul, bea) -> not Outride(bea, rahul)\n\nnot Outride(evita, rahul)\n\nforall x (Euphonous(x) and not Behold(x, evita) -> Outride(x, rahul)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The rakel habituate the arvind. The rakel habituate the minerva. The rakel is not penumbral. The rakel tell the minerva. The arvind habituate the rakel. The arvind habituate the minerva. The arvind is ictic. The arvind is utterable. The arvind tailgate the rakel. The arvind tailgate the minerva. The minerva habituate the arvind. The minerva is not penumbral. The minerva is ictic. The minerva tell the rakel. The minerva tailgate the rakel. If someone is ictic then they need the minerva. If someone tailgate the rakel and the rakel tailgate the minerva then the minerva tell the arvind. If someone habituate the rakel then they like the arvind. If someone tailgate the rakel then they are ictic. If someone habituate the arvind and the arvind habituate the rakel then the rakel is ictic. If someone is ictic and they do not eat the arvind then they like the minerva. If someone is penumbral and they eat the rakel then they are akimbo. If the minerva habituate the rakel then the rakel does not like the minerva. The rakel is akimbo.", "logic": "\nHabituate(rakel, arvind)\nHabituate(rakel, minerva)\nnot Penumbral(rakel)\nTell(rakel, minerva)\nHabituate(arvind, rakel)\nHabituate(arvind, minerva)\nIctic(arvind)\nUtterable(arvind)\nTailgate(arvind, rakel)\nTailgate(arvind, minerva)\nHabituate(minerva, arvind)\nnot Penumbral(minerva)\nIctic(minerva)\nTell(minerva, rakel)\nTailgate(minerva, rakel)\nforall x (Ictic(x) -> Tailgate(x, minerva))\nforall x (Tailgate(x, rakel) and Tailgate(rakel, minerva) -> Tell(minerva, arvind))\nforall x (Habituate(x, rakel) -> Tell(x, arvind))\nforall x (Tailgate(x, rakel) -> Ictic(x))\nforall x (Habituate(x, arvind) and Habituate(arvind, rakel) -> Ictic(rakel))\nforall x (Ictic(x) and not Habituate(x, arvind) -> Tell(x, minerva))\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and Habituate(x, rakel) -> Akimbo(x))\nHabituate(minerva, rakel) -> not Tell(rakel, minerva)\n\nAkimbo(rakel)\n\nforall x (Penumbral(x) and Habituate(x, rakel) -> Akimbo(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The jacky frizzle the wynnie. The jacky frizzle the brynn. The jacky is not lxxviii. The jacky snaffle the brynn. The wynnie frizzle the jacky. The wynnie frizzle the brynn. The wynnie is sloppy. The wynnie is myelinated. The wynnie tenant the jacky. The wynnie tenant the brynn. The brynn frizzle the wynnie. The brynn is not lxxviii. The brynn is sloppy. The brynn snaffle the jacky. The brynn tenant the jacky. If someone is sloppy then they need the brynn. If someone tenant the jacky and the jacky tenant the brynn then the brynn snaffle the wynnie. If someone frizzle the jacky then they like the wynnie. If someone tenant the jacky then they are sloppy. If someone frizzle the wynnie and the wynnie frizzle the jacky then the jacky is sloppy. If someone is sloppy and they do not eat the wynnie then they like the brynn. If someone is lxxviii and they eat the jacky then they are womanly. If the brynn frizzle the jacky then the jacky does not like the brynn. The brynn does not like the brynn.", "logic": "\nFrizzle(jacky, wynnie)\nFrizzle(jacky, brynn)\nnot Lxxviii(jacky)\nSnaffle(jacky, brynn)\nFrizzle(wynnie, jacky)\nFrizzle(wynnie, brynn)\nSloppy(wynnie)\nMyelinated(wynnie)\nTenant(wynnie, jacky)\nTenant(wynnie, brynn)\nFrizzle(brynn, wynnie)\nnot Lxxviii(brynn)\nSloppy(brynn)\nSnaffle(brynn, jacky)\nTenant(brynn, jacky)\nforall x (Sloppy(x) -> Tenant(x, brynn))\nforall x (Tenant(x, jacky) and Tenant(jacky, brynn) -> Snaffle(brynn, wynnie))\nforall x (Frizzle(x, jacky) -> Snaffle(x, wynnie))\nforall x (Tenant(x, jacky) -> Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Frizzle(x, wynnie) and Frizzle(wynnie, jacky) -> Sloppy(jacky))\nforall x (Sloppy(x) and not Frizzle(x, wynnie) -> Snaffle(x, brynn))\nforall x (Lxxviii(x) and Frizzle(x, jacky) -> Womanly(x))\nFrizzle(brynn, jacky) -> not Snaffle(jacky, brynn)\n\nnot Snaffle(brynn, brynn)\n\nforall x (Sloppy(x) and not Frizzle(x, wynnie) -> Snaffle(x, brynn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The thadeus scuffle the elvis. The thadeus scuffle the zaria. The thadeus is not babyish. The thadeus inter the zaria. The elvis scuffle the thadeus. The elvis scuffle the zaria. The elvis is stony. The elvis is prenominal. The elvis inflate the thadeus. The elvis inflate the zaria. The zaria scuffle the elvis. The zaria is not babyish. The zaria is stony. The zaria inter the thadeus. The zaria inflate the thadeus. If someone is stony then they need the zaria. If someone inflate the thadeus and the thadeus inflate the zaria then the zaria inter the elvis. If someone scuffle the thadeus then they like the elvis. If someone inflate the thadeus then they are stony. If someone scuffle the elvis and the elvis scuffle the thadeus then the thadeus is stony. If someone is stony and they do not eat the elvis then they like the zaria. If someone is babyish and they eat the thadeus then they are unshaded. If the zaria scuffle the thadeus then the thadeus does not like the zaria. The thadeus inter the elvis.", "logic": "\nScuffle(thadeus, elvis)\nScuffle(thadeus, zaria)\nnot Babyish(thadeus)\nInter(thadeus, zaria)\nScuffle(elvis, thadeus)\nScuffle(elvis, zaria)\nStony(elvis)\nPrenominal(elvis)\nInflate(elvis, thadeus)\nInflate(elvis, zaria)\nScuffle(zaria, elvis)\nnot Babyish(zaria)\nStony(zaria)\nInter(zaria, thadeus)\nInflate(zaria, thadeus)\nforall x (Stony(x) -> Inflate(x, zaria))\nforall x (Inflate(x, thadeus) and Inflate(thadeus, zaria) -> Inter(zaria, elvis))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, thadeus) -> Inter(x, elvis))\nforall x (Inflate(x, thadeus) -> Stony(x))\nforall x (Scuffle(x, elvis) and Scuffle(elvis, thadeus) -> Stony(thadeus))\nforall x (Stony(x) and not Scuffle(x, elvis) -> Inter(x, zaria))\nforall x (Babyish(x) and Scuffle(x, thadeus) -> Unshaded(x))\nScuffle(zaria, thadeus) -> not Inter(thadeus, zaria)\n\nInter(thadeus, elvis)\n\nforall x (Scuffle(x, thadeus) -> Inter(x, elvis)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The casie waft the krystalle. The casie waft the lindie. The casie is not complex. The casie winkle the lindie. The krystalle waft the casie. The krystalle waft the lindie. The krystalle is getable. The krystalle is distressed. The krystalle orate the casie. The krystalle orate the lindie. The lindie waft the krystalle. The lindie is not complex. The lindie is getable. The lindie winkle the casie. The lindie orate the casie. If someone is getable then they need the lindie. If someone orate the casie and the casie orate the lindie then the lindie winkle the krystalle. If someone waft the casie then they like the krystalle. If someone orate the casie then they are getable. If someone waft the krystalle and the krystalle waft the casie then the casie is getable. If someone is getable and they do not eat the krystalle then they like the lindie. If someone is complex and they eat the casie then they are cultured. If the lindie waft the casie then the casie does not like the lindie. The krystalle is not rough.", "logic": "\nWaft(casie, krystalle)\nWaft(casie, lindie)\nnot Complex(casie)\nWinkle(casie, lindie)\nWaft(krystalle, casie)\nWaft(krystalle, lindie)\nGetable(krystalle)\nDistressed(krystalle)\nOrate(krystalle, casie)\nOrate(krystalle, lindie)\nWaft(lindie, krystalle)\nnot Complex(lindie)\nGetable(lindie)\nWinkle(lindie, casie)\nOrate(lindie, casie)\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Orate(x, lindie))\nforall x (Orate(x, casie) and Orate(casie, lindie) -> Winkle(lindie, krystalle))\nforall x (Waft(x, casie) -> Winkle(x, krystalle))\nforall x (Orate(x, casie) -> Getable(x))\nforall x (Waft(x, krystalle) and Waft(krystalle, casie) -> Getable(casie))\nforall x (Getable(x) and not Waft(x, krystalle) -> Winkle(x, lindie))\nforall x (Complex(x) and Waft(x, casie) -> Cultured(x))\nWaft(lindie, casie) -> not Winkle(casie, lindie)\n\nnot Rough(krystalle)\n\nnot Rough(krystalle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The salim lance the max. The salim lance the inga. The salim is not desirous. The salim resort the inga. The max lance the salim. The max lance the inga. The max is centrist. The max is unmanful. The max voice the salim. The max voice the inga. The inga lance the max. The inga is not desirous. The inga is centrist. The inga resort the salim. The inga voice the salim. If someone is centrist then they need the inga. If someone voice the salim and the salim voice the inga then the inga resort the max. If someone lance the salim then they like the max. If someone voice the salim then they are centrist. If someone lance the max and the max lance the salim then the salim is centrist. If someone is centrist and they do not eat the max then they like the inga. If someone is desirous and they eat the salim then they are ridiculous. If the inga lance the salim then the salim does not like the inga. The inga voice the max.", "logic": "\nLance(salim, max)\nLance(salim, inga)\nnot Desirous(salim)\nResort(salim, inga)\nLance(max, salim)\nLance(max, inga)\nCentrist(max)\nUnmanful(max)\nVoice(max, salim)\nVoice(max, inga)\nLance(inga, max)\nnot Desirous(inga)\nCentrist(inga)\nResort(inga, salim)\nVoice(inga, salim)\nforall x (Centrist(x) -> Voice(x, inga))\nforall x (Voice(x, salim) and Voice(salim, inga) -> Resort(inga, max))\nforall x (Lance(x, salim) -> Resort(x, max))\nforall x (Voice(x, salim) -> Centrist(x))\nforall x (Lance(x, max) and Lance(max, salim) -> Centrist(salim))\nforall x (Centrist(x) and not Lance(x, max) -> Resort(x, inga))\nforall x (Desirous(x) and Lance(x, salim) -> Ridiculous(x))\nLance(inga, salim) -> not Resort(salim, inga)\n\nVoice(inga, max)\n\nVoice(inga, max) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The lazaro moan the annemarie. The lazaro moan the doti. The lazaro is not five. The lazaro catch the doti. The annemarie moan the lazaro. The annemarie moan the doti. The annemarie is cordiform. The annemarie is climbable. The annemarie hedgehop the lazaro. The annemarie hedgehop the doti. The doti moan the annemarie. The doti is not five. The doti is cordiform. The doti catch the lazaro. The doti hedgehop the lazaro. If someone is cordiform then they need the doti. If someone hedgehop the lazaro and the lazaro hedgehop the doti then the doti catch the annemarie. If someone moan the lazaro then they like the annemarie. If someone hedgehop the lazaro then they are cordiform. If someone moan the annemarie and the annemarie moan the lazaro then the lazaro is cordiform. If someone is cordiform and they do not eat the annemarie then they like the doti. If someone is five and they eat the lazaro then they are noiseless. If the doti moan the lazaro then the lazaro does not like the doti. The lazaro does not need the annemarie.", "logic": "\nMoan(lazaro, annemarie)\nMoan(lazaro, doti)\nnot Five(lazaro)\nCatch(lazaro, doti)\nMoan(annemarie, lazaro)\nMoan(annemarie, doti)\nCordiform(annemarie)\nClimbable(annemarie)\nHedgehop(annemarie, lazaro)\nHedgehop(annemarie, doti)\nMoan(doti, annemarie)\nnot Five(doti)\nCordiform(doti)\nCatch(doti, lazaro)\nHedgehop(doti, lazaro)\nforall x (Cordiform(x) -> Hedgehop(x, doti))\nforall x (Hedgehop(x, lazaro) and Hedgehop(lazaro, doti) -> Catch(doti, annemarie))\nforall x (Moan(x, lazaro) -> Catch(x, annemarie))\nforall x (Hedgehop(x, lazaro) -> Cordiform(x))\nforall x (Moan(x, annemarie) and Moan(annemarie, lazaro) -> Cordiform(lazaro))\nforall x (Cordiform(x) and not Moan(x, annemarie) -> Catch(x, doti))\nforall x (Five(x) and Moan(x, lazaro) -> Noiseless(x))\nMoan(doti, lazaro) -> not Catch(lazaro, doti)\n\nnot Hedgehop(lazaro, annemarie)\n\nnot Hedgehop(lazaro, annemarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "The sauncho condescend the liora. The sauncho condescend the shepherd. The sauncho is not accepted. The sauncho trail the shepherd. The liora condescend the sauncho. The liora condescend the shepherd. The liora is east. The liora is harrowing. The liora resile the sauncho. The liora resile the shepherd. The shepherd condescend the liora. The shepherd is not accepted. The shepherd is east. The shepherd trail the sauncho. The shepherd resile the sauncho. If someone is east then they need the shepherd. If someone resile the sauncho and the sauncho resile the shepherd then the shepherd trail the liora. If someone condescend the sauncho then they like the liora. If someone resile the sauncho then they are east. If someone condescend the liora and the liora condescend the sauncho then the sauncho is east. If someone is east and they do not eat the liora then they like the shepherd. If someone is accepted and they eat the sauncho then they are mistakable. If the shepherd condescend the sauncho then the sauncho does not like the shepherd. The sauncho is rough.", "logic": "\nCondescend(sauncho, liora)\nCondescend(sauncho, shepherd)\nnot Accepted(sauncho)\nTrail(sauncho, shepherd)\nCondescend(liora, sauncho)\nCondescend(liora, shepherd)\nEast(liora)\nHarrowing(liora)\nResile(liora, sauncho)\nResile(liora, shepherd)\nCondescend(shepherd, liora)\nnot Accepted(shepherd)\nEast(shepherd)\nTrail(shepherd, sauncho)\nResile(shepherd, sauncho)\nforall x (East(x) -> Resile(x, shepherd))\nforall x (Resile(x, sauncho) and Resile(sauncho, shepherd) -> Trail(shepherd, liora))\nforall x (Condescend(x, sauncho) -> Trail(x, liora))\nforall x (Resile(x, sauncho) -> East(x))\nforall x (Condescend(x, liora) and Condescend(liora, sauncho) -> East(sauncho))\nforall x (East(x) and not Condescend(x, liora) -> Trail(x, shepherd))\nforall x (Accepted(x) and Condescend(x, sauncho) -> Mistakable(x))\nCondescend(shepherd, sauncho) -> not Trail(sauncho, shepherd)\n\nRough(sauncho)\n\nRough(sauncho) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1178"} {"premises": "Giuseppe is troublous. Veda is troublous. Diena is gluey. Andie is zillion. If something is cheesy and squinty then it is gluey. All dexterous things are troublous. Round, zillion things are bifacial. If something is squinty and zillion then it is cheesy. If something is bifacial then it is dexterous. All bifacial things are gluey. Cold things are troublous. Young, gluey things are bifacial. Diena is gluey.", "logic": "\nTroublous(giuseppe)\nTroublous(veda)\nGluey(diena)\nZillion(andie)\nforall x (Cheesy(x) and Squinty(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Dexterous(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) and Zillion(x) -> Bifacial(x))\nforall x (Squinty(x) and Zillion(x) -> Cheesy(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Dexterous(x))\nforall x (Bifacial(x) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Zillion(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Cheesy(x) and Gluey(x) -> Bifacial(x))\n\nGluey(diena)\n\ntherefore Gluey(diena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Lazlo is sublimated. Harriette is sublimated. Ruddy is diminutive. Kirstyn is dropping. If something is sultry and sciolistic then it is diminutive. All nubby things are sublimated. Round, dropping things are pentagonal. If something is sciolistic and dropping then it is sultry. If something is pentagonal then it is nubby. All pentagonal things are diminutive. Cold things are sublimated. Young, diminutive things are pentagonal. Harriette is not sublimated.", "logic": "\nSublimated(lazlo)\nSublimated(harriette)\nDiminutive(ruddy)\nDropping(kirstyn)\nforall x (Sultry(x) and Sciolistic(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Nubby(x) -> Sublimated(x))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) and Dropping(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\nforall x (Sciolistic(x) and Dropping(x) -> Sultry(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Nubby(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Diminutive(x))\nforall x (Dropping(x) -> Sublimated(x))\nforall x (Sultry(x) and Diminutive(x) -> Pentagonal(x))\n\nnot Sublimated(harriette)\n\ntherefore Sublimated(harriette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Meg is macerative. Aili is macerative. Michelle is aboulic. Devinne is reposeful. If something is toilsome and humanist then it is aboulic. All whiskered things are macerative. Round, reposeful things are womanly. If something is humanist and reposeful then it is toilsome. If something is womanly then it is whiskered. All womanly things are aboulic. Cold things are macerative. Young, aboulic things are womanly. Devinne is macerative.", "logic": "\nMacerative(meg)\nMacerative(aili)\nAboulic(michelle)\nReposeful(devinne)\nforall x (Toilsome(x) and Humanist(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Whiskered(x) -> Macerative(x))\nforall x (Macerative(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Humanist(x) and Reposeful(x) -> Toilsome(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Whiskered(x))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Reposeful(x) -> Macerative(x))\nforall x (Toilsome(x) and Aboulic(x) -> Womanly(x))\n\nMacerative(devinne)\n\nReposeful(devinne) and forall x (Reposeful(x) -> Macerative(x)) -> therefore Macerative(devinne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Lamar is ninefold. Shanta is ninefold. Rickey is cupular. Danice is paunchy. If something is unvalued and hadal then it is cupular. All bedewed things are ninefold. Round, paunchy things are disturbed. If something is hadal and paunchy then it is unvalued. If something is disturbed then it is bedewed. All disturbed things are cupular. Cold things are ninefold. Young, cupular things are disturbed. Danice is not ninefold.", "logic": "\nNinefold(lamar)\nNinefold(shanta)\nCupular(rickey)\nPaunchy(danice)\nforall x (Unvalued(x) and Hadal(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Ninefold(x) and Paunchy(x) -> Disturbed(x))\nforall x (Hadal(x) and Paunchy(x) -> Unvalued(x))\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Bedewed(x))\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Paunchy(x) -> Ninefold(x))\nforall x (Unvalued(x) and Cupular(x) -> Disturbed(x))\n\nnot Ninefold(danice)\n\nPaunchy(danice) and forall x (Paunchy(x) -> Ninefold(x)) -> therefore Ninefold(danice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Roselia is stratified. Othilia is stratified. Gwenni is soppy. Waine is algonkian. If something is dreamy and despotical then it is soppy. All extraneous things are stratified. Round, algonkian things are copesetic. If something is despotical and algonkian then it is dreamy. If something is copesetic then it is extraneous. All copesetic things are soppy. Cold things are stratified. Young, soppy things are copesetic. Waine is copesetic.", "logic": "\nStratified(roselia)\nStratified(othilia)\nSoppy(gwenni)\nAlgonkian(waine)\nforall x (Dreamy(x) and Despotical(x) -> Soppy(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Stratified(x))\nforall x (Stratified(x) and Algonkian(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (Despotical(x) and Algonkian(x) -> Dreamy(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Soppy(x))\nforall x (Algonkian(x) -> Stratified(x))\nforall x (Dreamy(x) and Soppy(x) -> Copesetic(x))\n\nCopesetic(waine)\n\nAlgonkian(waine) and forall x (Algonkian(x) -> Stratified(x)) -> therefore Stratified(waine) Stratified(waine) and Algonkian(waine) and forall x (Stratified(x) and Algonkian(x) -> Copesetic(x)) -> therefore Copesetic(waine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Fae is uncolumned. Malina is uncolumned. Georgena is bouncy. Jamima is cleared. If something is decent and fulsome then it is bouncy. All carpeted things are uncolumned. Round, cleared things are minty. If something is fulsome and cleared then it is decent. If something is minty then it is carpeted. All minty things are bouncy. Cold things are uncolumned. Young, bouncy things are minty. Jamima is not minty.", "logic": "\nUncolumned(fae)\nUncolumned(malina)\nBouncy(georgena)\nCleared(jamima)\nforall x (Decent(x) and Fulsome(x) -> Bouncy(x))\nforall x (Carpeted(x) -> Uncolumned(x))\nforall x (Uncolumned(x) and Cleared(x) -> Minty(x))\nforall x (Fulsome(x) and Cleared(x) -> Decent(x))\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Carpeted(x))\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Bouncy(x))\nforall x (Cleared(x) -> Uncolumned(x))\nforall x (Decent(x) and Bouncy(x) -> Minty(x))\n\nnot Minty(jamima)\n\nCleared(jamima) and forall x (Cleared(x) -> Uncolumned(x)) -> therefore Uncolumned(jamima) Uncolumned(jamima) and Cleared(jamima) and forall x (Uncolumned(x) and Cleared(x) -> Minty(x)) -> therefore Minty(jamima)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Karsten is gallant. Susette is gallant. Catharine is immodest. Marline is ferrous. If something is skim and bodiless then it is immodest. All cathectic things are gallant. Round, ferrous things are crustlike. If something is bodiless and ferrous then it is skim. If something is crustlike then it is cathectic. All crustlike things are immodest. Cold things are gallant. Young, immodest things are crustlike. Marline is cathectic.", "logic": "\nGallant(karsten)\nGallant(susette)\nImmodest(catharine)\nFerrous(marline)\nforall x (Skim(x) and Bodiless(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Crustlike(x))\nforall x (Bodiless(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Skim(x))\nforall x (Crustlike(x) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Crustlike(x) -> Immodest(x))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Gallant(x))\nforall x (Skim(x) and Immodest(x) -> Crustlike(x))\n\nCathectic(marline)\n\nFerrous(marline) and forall x (Ferrous(x) -> Gallant(x)) -> therefore Gallant(marline) Gallant(marline) and Ferrous(marline) and forall x (Gallant(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Crustlike(x)) -> therefore Crustlike(marline) Crustlike(marline) and forall x (Crustlike(x) -> Cathectic(x)) -> therefore Cathectic(marline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Ethelred is pedantic. Ursuline is pedantic. Clotilda is bacteroid. Suki is boxy. If something is unrelaxed and dotted then it is bacteroid. All apologetic things are pedantic. Round, boxy things are overgrown. If something is dotted and boxy then it is unrelaxed. If something is overgrown then it is apologetic. All overgrown things are bacteroid. Cold things are pedantic. Young, bacteroid things are overgrown. Suki is not bacteroid.", "logic": "\nPedantic(ethelred)\nPedantic(ursuline)\nBacteroid(clotilda)\nBoxy(suki)\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) and Dotted(x) -> Bacteroid(x))\nforall x (Apologetic(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) and Boxy(x) -> Overgrown(x))\nforall x (Dotted(x) and Boxy(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Overgrown(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Overgrown(x) -> Bacteroid(x))\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) and Bacteroid(x) -> Overgrown(x))\n\nnot Bacteroid(suki)\n\nBoxy(suki) and forall x (Boxy(x) -> Pedantic(x)) -> therefore Pedantic(suki) Pedantic(suki) and Boxy(suki) and forall x (Pedantic(x) and Boxy(x) -> Overgrown(x)) -> therefore Overgrown(suki) Overgrown(suki) and forall x (Overgrown(x) -> Bacteroid(x)) -> therefore Bacteroid(suki)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Bathsheba is internal. Christina is internal. Martainn is detersive. Goldarina is recyclable. If something is rhyming and capillary then it is detersive. All parental things are internal. Round, recyclable things are tuneless. If something is capillary and recyclable then it is rhyming. If something is tuneless then it is parental. All tuneless things are detersive. Cold things are internal. Young, detersive things are tuneless. Christina is not tuneless.", "logic": "\nInternal(bathsheba)\nInternal(christina)\nDetersive(martainn)\nRecyclable(goldarina)\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and Capillary(x) -> Detersive(x))\nforall x (Parental(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) and Recyclable(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nforall x (Capillary(x) and Recyclable(x) -> Rhyming(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Parental(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Detersive(x))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and Detersive(x) -> Tuneless(x))\n\nnot Tuneless(christina)\n\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and Detersive(x) -> Tuneless(x)) <- forall x (Capillary(x) and Recyclable(x) -> Rhyming(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Isaac is knotted. Lambert is knotted. Winona is coccoid. Maurene is hyperbolic. If something is harassed and sheer then it is coccoid. All supposable things are knotted. Round, hyperbolic things are cornish. If something is sheer and hyperbolic then it is harassed. If something is cornish then it is supposable. All cornish things are coccoid. Cold things are knotted. Young, coccoid things are cornish. Isaac is supposable.", "logic": "\nKnotted(isaac)\nKnotted(lambert)\nCoccoid(winona)\nHyperbolic(maurene)\nforall x (Harassed(x) and Sheer(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nforall x (Supposable(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Knotted(x) and Hyperbolic(x) -> Cornish(x))\nforall x (Sheer(x) and Hyperbolic(x) -> Harassed(x))\nforall x (Cornish(x) -> Supposable(x))\nforall x (Cornish(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Harassed(x) and Coccoid(x) -> Cornish(x))\n\nSupposable(isaac)\n\nforall x (Cornish(x) -> Supposable(x)) <- forall x (Harassed(x) and Coccoid(x) -> Cornish(x)) <- forall x (Sheer(x) and Hyperbolic(x) -> Harassed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Jobie is cathedral. Row is cathedral. Ladonna is azygos. Tomasina is verified. If something is decumbent and angled then it is azygos. All raunchy things are cathedral. Round, verified things are unhindered. If something is angled and verified then it is decumbent. If something is unhindered then it is raunchy. All unhindered things are azygos. Cold things are cathedral. Young, azygos things are unhindered. Ladonna is not unhindered.", "logic": "\nCathedral(jobie)\nCathedral(row)\nAzygos(ladonna)\nVerified(tomasina)\nforall x (Decumbent(x) and Angled(x) -> Azygos(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Verified(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Angled(x) and Verified(x) -> Decumbent(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Raunchy(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Azygos(x))\nforall x (Verified(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Decumbent(x) and Azygos(x) -> Unhindered(x))\n\nnot Unhindered(ladonna)\n\nforall x (Decumbent(x) and Azygos(x) -> Unhindered(x)) <- forall x (Angled(x) and Verified(x) -> Decumbent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Mariette is troublous. Ailene is troublous. Phaedra is indicative. Shena is perfected. If something is nonvisual and phonologic then it is indicative. All angolan things are troublous. Round, perfected things are bellied. If something is phonologic and perfected then it is nonvisual. If something is bellied then it is angolan. All bellied things are indicative. Cold things are troublous. Young, indicative things are bellied. Ailene is angolan.", "logic": "\nTroublous(mariette)\nTroublous(ailene)\nIndicative(phaedra)\nPerfected(shena)\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) and Phonologic(x) -> Indicative(x))\nforall x (Angolan(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) and Perfected(x) -> Bellied(x))\nforall x (Phonologic(x) and Perfected(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> Angolan(x))\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> Indicative(x))\nforall x (Perfected(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) and Indicative(x) -> Bellied(x))\n\nAngolan(ailene)\n\nforall x (Bellied(x) -> Angolan(x)) <- forall x (Nonvisual(x) and Indicative(x) -> Bellied(x)) <- forall x (Phonologic(x) and Perfected(x) -> Nonvisual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Kiley is impervious. Rutger is impervious. Abigael is desired. Kathie is protrusile. If something is brave and boney then it is desired. All adnate things are impervious. Round, protrusile things are babelike. If something is boney and protrusile then it is brave. If something is babelike then it is adnate. All babelike things are desired. Cold things are impervious. Young, desired things are babelike. Kiley is not boney.", "logic": "\nImpervious(kiley)\nImpervious(rutger)\nDesired(abigael)\nProtrusile(kathie)\nforall x (Brave(x) and Boney(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Adnate(x) -> Impervious(x))\nforall x (Impervious(x) and Protrusile(x) -> Babelike(x))\nforall x (Boney(x) and Protrusile(x) -> Brave(x))\nforall x (Babelike(x) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Babelike(x) -> Desired(x))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Impervious(x))\nforall x (Brave(x) and Desired(x) -> Babelike(x))\n\nnot Boney(kiley)\n\nnot Boney(kiley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Opaline is slaked. Hatti is slaked. Geoffry is wideband. Helge is porous. If something is freehanded and unbent then it is wideband. All neotenic things are slaked. Round, porous things are tatty. If something is unbent and porous then it is freehanded. If something is tatty then it is neotenic. All tatty things are wideband. Cold things are slaked. Young, wideband things are tatty. Hatti is porous.", "logic": "\nSlaked(opaline)\nSlaked(hatti)\nWideband(geoffry)\nPorous(helge)\nforall x (Freehanded(x) and Unbent(x) -> Wideband(x))\nforall x (Neotenic(x) -> Slaked(x))\nforall x (Slaked(x) and Porous(x) -> Tatty(x))\nforall x (Unbent(x) and Porous(x) -> Freehanded(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) -> Neotenic(x))\nforall x (Tatty(x) -> Wideband(x))\nforall x (Porous(x) -> Slaked(x))\nforall x (Freehanded(x) and Wideband(x) -> Tatty(x))\n\nPorous(hatti)\n\nPorous(hatti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Willdon is brushlike. Kristian is brushlike. Sosanna is grown. Judye is muddled. If something is extrinsic and rushy then it is grown. All intimal things are brushlike. Round, muddled things are sharp. If something is rushy and muddled then it is extrinsic. If something is sharp then it is intimal. All sharp things are grown. Cold things are brushlike. Young, grown things are sharp. Sosanna is not muddled.", "logic": "\nBrushlike(willdon)\nBrushlike(kristian)\nGrown(sosanna)\nMuddled(judye)\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) and Rushy(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Intimal(x) -> Brushlike(x))\nforall x (Brushlike(x) and Muddled(x) -> Sharp(x))\nforall x (Rushy(x) and Muddled(x) -> Extrinsic(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Intimal(x))\nforall x (Sharp(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) -> Brushlike(x))\nforall x (Extrinsic(x) and Grown(x) -> Sharp(x))\n\nnot Muddled(sosanna)\n\nnot Muddled(sosanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "Emmalee is anestric. Kelsy is anestric. Bernette is sunset. Jeanelle is exergonic. If something is epigastric and actable then it is sunset. All romantic things are anestric. Round, exergonic things are latter. If something is actable and exergonic then it is epigastric. If something is latter then it is romantic. All latter things are sunset. Cold things are anestric. Young, sunset things are latter. Kelsy is actable.", "logic": "\nAnestric(emmalee)\nAnestric(kelsy)\nSunset(bernette)\nExergonic(jeanelle)\nforall x (Epigastric(x) and Actable(x) -> Sunset(x))\nforall x (Romantic(x) -> Anestric(x))\nforall x (Anestric(x) and Exergonic(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Actable(x) and Exergonic(x) -> Epigastric(x))\nforall x (Latter(x) -> Romantic(x))\nforall x (Latter(x) -> Sunset(x))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) -> Anestric(x))\nforall x (Epigastric(x) and Sunset(x) -> Latter(x))\n\nActable(kelsy)\n\nActable(kelsy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-495"} {"premises": "The sean is stigmatic. The tiffani is sour. The katheryn is stigmatic. If someone crinkle the katheryn then the katheryn begrudge the sean. If someone is sour and they eat the tiffani then the tiffani begrudge the katheryn. If someone begrudge the sean then they see the tiffani. The tiffani is sour.", "logic": "\nStigmatic(sean)\nSour(tiffani)\nStigmatic(katheryn)\nforall x (Crinkle(x, katheryn) -> Begrudge(katheryn, sean))\nforall x (Sour(x) and Begrudge(x, tiffani) -> Begrudge(tiffani, katheryn))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, sean) -> Crinkle(x, tiffani))\n\nSour(tiffani)\n\ntherefore Sour(tiffani)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-984"} {"premises": "The madeline is labial. The arron is agile. The cati is labial. If someone bespatter the cati then the cati sidestep the madeline. If someone is agile and they eat the arron then the arron sidestep the cati. If someone sidestep the madeline then they see the arron. The madeline is not labial.", "logic": "\nLabial(madeline)\nAgile(arron)\nLabial(cati)\nforall x (Bespatter(x, cati) -> Sidestep(cati, madeline))\nforall x (Agile(x) and Sidestep(x, arron) -> Sidestep(arron, cati))\nforall x (Sidestep(x, madeline) -> Bespatter(x, arron))\n\nnot Labial(madeline)\n\ntherefore Labial(madeline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-984"} {"premises": "The christi is beneficent. The nerita is fabulous. The iggie is beneficent. If someone amass the iggie then the iggie bivouac the christi. If someone is fabulous and they eat the nerita then the nerita bivouac the iggie. If someone bivouac the christi then they see the nerita. The christi does not see the nerita.", "logic": "\nBeneficent(christi)\nFabulous(nerita)\nBeneficent(iggie)\nforall x (Amass(x, iggie) -> Bivouac(iggie, christi))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) and Bivouac(x, nerita) -> Bivouac(nerita, iggie))\nforall x (Bivouac(x, christi) -> Amass(x, nerita))\n\nnot Amass(christi, nerita)\n\nforall x (Bivouac(x, christi) -> Amass(x, nerita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-984"} {"premises": "The merrile is aflicker. The jesselyn is capacious. The marlyn is aflicker. If someone pummel the marlyn then the marlyn appose the merrile. If someone is capacious and they eat the jesselyn then the jesselyn appose the marlyn. If someone appose the merrile then they see the jesselyn. The merrile is big.", "logic": "\nAflicker(merrile)\nCapacious(jesselyn)\nAflicker(marlyn)\nforall x (Pummel(x, marlyn) -> Appose(marlyn, merrile))\nforall x (Capacious(x) and Appose(x, jesselyn) -> Appose(jesselyn, marlyn))\nforall x (Appose(x, merrile) -> Pummel(x, jesselyn))\n\nBig(merrile)\n\nBig(merrile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-984"} {"premises": "Jonell is anamorphic. Jonell is paediatric. Jonell is quadruple. Dru is paediatric. Dru is ivied. Dru is lengthways. Dru is pristine. Furry people are ivied. If someone is ivied then they are lengthways. If Jonell is pristine and Jonell is quadruple then Jonell is lengthways. All paediatric, anamorphic people are lengthways. All pristine people are ivied. If someone is ivied and anamorphic then they are atonal. If Jonell is anamorphic and Jonell is atonal then Jonell is pristine. If Jonell is anamorphic and Jonell is paediatric then Jonell is lengthways. Jonell is anamorphic.", "logic": "\nAnamorphic(jonell)\nPaediatric(jonell)\nQuadruple(jonell)\nPaediatric(dru)\nIvied(dru)\nLengthways(dru)\nPristine(dru)\nforall x (Paediatric(x) -> Ivied(x))\nforall x (Ivied(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nPristine(jonell) and Quadruple(jonell) -> Lengthways(jonell)\nforall x (Paediatric(x) and Anamorphic(x) -> Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Pristine(x) -> Ivied(x))\nforall x (Ivied(x) and Anamorphic(x) -> Atonal(x))\nAnamorphic(jonell) and Atonal(jonell) -> Pristine(jonell)\nAnamorphic(jonell) and Paediatric(jonell) -> Lengthways(jonell)\n\nAnamorphic(jonell)\n\ntherefore Anamorphic(jonell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Joana is lithuanian. Joana is hemic. Joana is monovalent. Maryanna is hemic. Maryanna is censorial. Maryanna is aged. Maryanna is redeemable. Furry people are censorial. If someone is censorial then they are aged. If Joana is redeemable and Joana is monovalent then Joana is aged. All hemic, lithuanian people are aged. All redeemable people are censorial. If someone is censorial and lithuanian then they are anhydrous. If Joana is lithuanian and Joana is anhydrous then Joana is redeemable. If Joana is lithuanian and Joana is hemic then Joana is aged. Maryanna is not redeemable.", "logic": "\nLithuanian(joana)\nHemic(joana)\nMonovalent(joana)\nHemic(maryanna)\nCensorial(maryanna)\nAged(maryanna)\nRedeemable(maryanna)\nforall x (Hemic(x) -> Censorial(x))\nforall x (Censorial(x) -> Aged(x))\nRedeemable(joana) and Monovalent(joana) -> Aged(joana)\nforall x (Hemic(x) and Lithuanian(x) -> Aged(x))\nforall x (Redeemable(x) -> Censorial(x))\nforall x (Censorial(x) and Lithuanian(x) -> Anhydrous(x))\nLithuanian(joana) and Anhydrous(joana) -> Redeemable(joana)\nLithuanian(joana) and Hemic(joana) -> Aged(joana)\n\nnot Redeemable(maryanna)\n\ntherefore Redeemable(maryanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Arther is disparate. Arther is outspread. Arther is sequined. Rajeev is outspread. Rajeev is seeable. Rajeev is privy. Rajeev is downwind. Furry people are seeable. If someone is seeable then they are privy. If Arther is downwind and Arther is sequined then Arther is privy. All outspread, disparate people are privy. All downwind people are seeable. If someone is seeable and disparate then they are drooping. If Arther is disparate and Arther is drooping then Arther is downwind. If Arther is disparate and Arther is outspread then Arther is privy. Arther is privy.", "logic": "\nDisparate(arther)\nOutspread(arther)\nSequined(arther)\nOutspread(rajeev)\nSeeable(rajeev)\nPrivy(rajeev)\nDownwind(rajeev)\nforall x (Outspread(x) -> Seeable(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) -> Privy(x))\nDownwind(arther) and Sequined(arther) -> Privy(arther)\nforall x (Outspread(x) and Disparate(x) -> Privy(x))\nforall x (Downwind(x) -> Seeable(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) and Disparate(x) -> Drooping(x))\nDisparate(arther) and Drooping(arther) -> Downwind(arther)\nDisparate(arther) and Outspread(arther) -> Privy(arther)\n\nPrivy(arther)\n\nDisparate(arther) and Outspread(arther) and Disparate(arther) and Outspread(arther) -> Privy(arther) -> therefore Privy(arther)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Sarajane is revived. Sarajane is autoerotic. Sarajane is sickly. Doralynn is autoerotic. Doralynn is deckled. Doralynn is etiolated. Doralynn is mislaid. Furry people are deckled. If someone is deckled then they are etiolated. If Sarajane is mislaid and Sarajane is sickly then Sarajane is etiolated. All autoerotic, revived people are etiolated. All mislaid people are deckled. If someone is deckled and revived then they are headlong. If Sarajane is revived and Sarajane is headlong then Sarajane is mislaid. If Sarajane is revived and Sarajane is autoerotic then Sarajane is etiolated. Sarajane is not etiolated.", "logic": "\nRevived(sarajane)\nAutoerotic(sarajane)\nSickly(sarajane)\nAutoerotic(doralynn)\nDeckled(doralynn)\nEtiolated(doralynn)\nMislaid(doralynn)\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Deckled(x) -> Etiolated(x))\nMislaid(sarajane) and Sickly(sarajane) -> Etiolated(sarajane)\nforall x (Autoerotic(x) and Revived(x) -> Etiolated(x))\nforall x (Mislaid(x) -> Deckled(x))\nforall x (Deckled(x) and Revived(x) -> Headlong(x))\nRevived(sarajane) and Headlong(sarajane) -> Mislaid(sarajane)\nRevived(sarajane) and Autoerotic(sarajane) -> Etiolated(sarajane)\n\nnot Etiolated(sarajane)\n\nRevived(sarajane) and Autoerotic(sarajane) and Revived(sarajane) and Autoerotic(sarajane) -> Etiolated(sarajane) -> therefore Etiolated(sarajane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Shannen is wandering. Shannen is achromous. Shannen is nourishing. Berke is achromous. Berke is designed. Berke is plumbic. Berke is picky. Furry people are designed. If someone is designed then they are plumbic. If Shannen is picky and Shannen is nourishing then Shannen is plumbic. All achromous, wandering people are plumbic. All picky people are designed. If someone is designed and wandering then they are winding. If Shannen is wandering and Shannen is winding then Shannen is picky. If Shannen is wandering and Shannen is achromous then Shannen is plumbic. Shannen is winding.", "logic": "\nWandering(shannen)\nAchromous(shannen)\nNourishing(shannen)\nAchromous(berke)\nDesigned(berke)\nPlumbic(berke)\nPicky(berke)\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Designed(x))\nforall x (Designed(x) -> Plumbic(x))\nPicky(shannen) and Nourishing(shannen) -> Plumbic(shannen)\nforall x (Achromous(x) and Wandering(x) -> Plumbic(x))\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Designed(x))\nforall x (Designed(x) and Wandering(x) -> Winding(x))\nWandering(shannen) and Winding(shannen) -> Picky(shannen)\nWandering(shannen) and Achromous(shannen) -> Plumbic(shannen)\n\nWinding(shannen)\n\nAchromous(shannen) and forall x (Achromous(x) -> Designed(x)) -> therefore Designed(shannen) Designed(shannen) and Wandering(shannen) and forall x (Designed(x) and Wandering(x) -> Winding(x)) -> therefore Winding(shannen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Lorain is sportive. Lorain is sparse. Lorain is mercurial. Roxi is sparse. Roxi is knowing. Roxi is calendered. Roxi is motorial. Furry people are knowing. If someone is knowing then they are calendered. If Lorain is motorial and Lorain is mercurial then Lorain is calendered. All sparse, sportive people are calendered. All motorial people are knowing. If someone is knowing and sportive then they are unremarked. If Lorain is sportive and Lorain is unremarked then Lorain is motorial. If Lorain is sportive and Lorain is sparse then Lorain is calendered. Lorain is not unremarked.", "logic": "\nSportive(lorain)\nSparse(lorain)\nMercurial(lorain)\nSparse(roxi)\nKnowing(roxi)\nCalendered(roxi)\nMotorial(roxi)\nforall x (Sparse(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) -> Calendered(x))\nMotorial(lorain) and Mercurial(lorain) -> Calendered(lorain)\nforall x (Sparse(x) and Sportive(x) -> Calendered(x))\nforall x (Motorial(x) -> Knowing(x))\nforall x (Knowing(x) and Sportive(x) -> Unremarked(x))\nSportive(lorain) and Unremarked(lorain) -> Motorial(lorain)\nSportive(lorain) and Sparse(lorain) -> Calendered(lorain)\n\nnot Unremarked(lorain)\n\nSparse(lorain) and forall x (Sparse(x) -> Knowing(x)) -> therefore Knowing(lorain) Knowing(lorain) and Sportive(lorain) and forall x (Knowing(x) and Sportive(x) -> Unremarked(x)) -> therefore Unremarked(lorain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Marji is storied. Marji is complex. Marji is numerable. Wittie is complex. Wittie is ovular. Wittie is laureate. Wittie is atlantic. Furry people are ovular. If someone is ovular then they are laureate. If Marji is atlantic and Marji is numerable then Marji is laureate. All complex, storied people are laureate. All atlantic people are ovular. If someone is ovular and storied then they are noxious. If Marji is storied and Marji is noxious then Marji is atlantic. If Marji is storied and Marji is complex then Marji is laureate. Marji is atlantic.", "logic": "\nStoried(marji)\nComplex(marji)\nNumerable(marji)\nComplex(wittie)\nOvular(wittie)\nLaureate(wittie)\nAtlantic(wittie)\nforall x (Complex(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) -> Laureate(x))\nAtlantic(marji) and Numerable(marji) -> Laureate(marji)\nforall x (Complex(x) and Storied(x) -> Laureate(x))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) and Storied(x) -> Noxious(x))\nStoried(marji) and Noxious(marji) -> Atlantic(marji)\nStoried(marji) and Complex(marji) -> Laureate(marji)\n\nAtlantic(marji)\n\nComplex(marji) and forall x (Complex(x) -> Ovular(x)) -> therefore Ovular(marji) Ovular(marji) and Storied(marji) and forall x (Ovular(x) and Storied(x) -> Noxious(x)) -> therefore Noxious(marji) Storied(marji) and Noxious(marji) and Storied(marji) and Noxious(marji) -> Atlantic(marji) -> therefore Atlantic(marji)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Francine is whiskery. Francine is aerolitic. Francine is carefree. Thea is aerolitic. Thea is scottish. Thea is home. Thea is monoclinal. Furry people are scottish. If someone is scottish then they are home. If Francine is monoclinal and Francine is carefree then Francine is home. All aerolitic, whiskery people are home. All monoclinal people are scottish. If someone is scottish and whiskery then they are enthralled. If Francine is whiskery and Francine is enthralled then Francine is monoclinal. If Francine is whiskery and Francine is aerolitic then Francine is home. Francine is not monoclinal.", "logic": "\nWhiskery(francine)\nAerolitic(francine)\nCarefree(francine)\nAerolitic(thea)\nScottish(thea)\nHome(thea)\nMonoclinal(thea)\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Scottish(x))\nforall x (Scottish(x) -> Home(x))\nMonoclinal(francine) and Carefree(francine) -> Home(francine)\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) and Whiskery(x) -> Home(x))\nforall x (Monoclinal(x) -> Scottish(x))\nforall x (Scottish(x) and Whiskery(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nWhiskery(francine) and Enthralled(francine) -> Monoclinal(francine)\nWhiskery(francine) and Aerolitic(francine) -> Home(francine)\n\nnot Monoclinal(francine)\n\nAerolitic(francine) and forall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Scottish(x)) -> therefore Scottish(francine) Scottish(francine) and Whiskery(francine) and forall x (Scottish(x) and Whiskery(x) -> Enthralled(x)) -> therefore Enthralled(francine) Whiskery(francine) and Enthralled(francine) and Whiskery(francine) and Enthralled(francine) -> Monoclinal(francine) -> therefore Monoclinal(francine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Gladis is mortuary. Gladis is milky. Gladis is xxxvii. Davie is milky. Davie is wonderful. Davie is laurelled. Davie is diagonal. Furry people are wonderful. If someone is wonderful then they are laurelled. If Gladis is diagonal and Gladis is xxxvii then Gladis is laurelled. All milky, mortuary people are laurelled. All diagonal people are wonderful. If someone is wonderful and mortuary then they are benthonic. If Gladis is mortuary and Gladis is benthonic then Gladis is diagonal. If Gladis is mortuary and Gladis is milky then Gladis is laurelled. Davie is not benthonic.", "logic": "\nMortuary(gladis)\nMilky(gladis)\nXxxvii(gladis)\nMilky(davie)\nWonderful(davie)\nLaurelled(davie)\nDiagonal(davie)\nforall x (Milky(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) -> Laurelled(x))\nDiagonal(gladis) and Xxxvii(gladis) -> Laurelled(gladis)\nforall x (Milky(x) and Mortuary(x) -> Laurelled(x))\nforall x (Diagonal(x) -> Wonderful(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and Mortuary(x) -> Benthonic(x))\nMortuary(gladis) and Benthonic(gladis) -> Diagonal(gladis)\nMortuary(gladis) and Milky(gladis) -> Laurelled(gladis)\n\nnot Benthonic(davie)\n\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and Mortuary(x) -> Benthonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Trudey is bored. Trudey is mordant. Trudey is stagnant. Catherin is mordant. Catherin is cockeyed. Catherin is allopatric. Catherin is senior. Furry people are cockeyed. If someone is cockeyed then they are allopatric. If Trudey is senior and Trudey is stagnant then Trudey is allopatric. All mordant, bored people are allopatric. All senior people are cockeyed. If someone is cockeyed and bored then they are unburied. If Trudey is bored and Trudey is unburied then Trudey is senior. If Trudey is bored and Trudey is mordant then Trudey is allopatric. Catherin is stagnant.", "logic": "\nBored(trudey)\nMordant(trudey)\nStagnant(trudey)\nMordant(catherin)\nCockeyed(catherin)\nAllopatric(catherin)\nSenior(catherin)\nforall x (Mordant(x) -> Cockeyed(x))\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nSenior(trudey) and Stagnant(trudey) -> Allopatric(trudey)\nforall x (Mordant(x) and Bored(x) -> Allopatric(x))\nforall x (Senior(x) -> Cockeyed(x))\nforall x (Cockeyed(x) and Bored(x) -> Unburied(x))\nBored(trudey) and Unburied(trudey) -> Senior(trudey)\nBored(trudey) and Mordant(trudey) -> Allopatric(trudey)\n\nStagnant(catherin)\n\nStagnant(catherin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1326"} {"premises": "Voltaire is not dacitic. Voltaire is brasslike. Lebbie is agile. Lebbie is sound. Lebbie is dacitic. Neely is agile. Neely is summary. Neely is not sound. Neely is not dacitic. Neely is not brasslike. Neely is not staunch. Neely is seaward. Kind things are agile. Lebbie is sound.", "logic": "\nnot Dacitic(voltaire)\nBrasslike(voltaire)\nAgile(lebbie)\nSound(lebbie)\nDacitic(lebbie)\nAgile(neely)\nSummary(neely)\nnot Sound(neely)\nnot Dacitic(neely)\nnot Brasslike(neely)\nnot Staunch(neely)\nSeaward(neely)\nforall x (Sound(x) -> Agile(x))\n\nSound(lebbie)\n\ntherefore Sound(lebbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3697"} {"premises": "Lemar is not triassic. Lemar is dismissive. Kassi is protanopic. Kassi is mistaken. Kassi is triassic. Gabbi is protanopic. Gabbi is primed. Gabbi is not mistaken. Gabbi is not triassic. Gabbi is not dismissive. Gabbi is not picaresque. Gabbi is sleeveless. Kind things are protanopic. Gabbi is dismissive.", "logic": "\nnot Triassic(lemar)\nDismissive(lemar)\nProtanopic(kassi)\nMistaken(kassi)\nTriassic(kassi)\nProtanopic(gabbi)\nPrimed(gabbi)\nnot Mistaken(gabbi)\nnot Triassic(gabbi)\nnot Dismissive(gabbi)\nnot Picaresque(gabbi)\nSleeveless(gabbi)\nforall x (Mistaken(x) -> Protanopic(x))\n\nDismissive(gabbi)\n\ntherefore not Dismissive(gabbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3697"} {"premises": "Angelico is not cringing. Angelico is muffled. Cecil is thundering. Cecil is greenish. Cecil is cringing. Nicoline is thundering. Nicoline is amebic. Nicoline is not greenish. Nicoline is not cringing. Nicoline is not muffled. Nicoline is not pecuniary. Nicoline is swinish. Kind things are thundering. Angelico is not thundering.", "logic": "\nnot Cringing(angelico)\nMuffled(angelico)\nThundering(cecil)\nGreenish(cecil)\nCringing(cecil)\nThundering(nicoline)\nAmebic(nicoline)\nnot Greenish(nicoline)\nnot Cringing(nicoline)\nnot Muffled(nicoline)\nnot Pecuniary(nicoline)\nSwinish(nicoline)\nforall x (Greenish(x) -> Thundering(x))\n\nnot Thundering(angelico)\n\nforall x (Greenish(x) -> Thundering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3697"} {"premises": "Kimmie is not narcotised. Kimmie is wingless. Carlynn is hateful. Carlynn is caliginous. Carlynn is narcotised. Geri is hateful. Geri is implike. Geri is not caliginous. Geri is not narcotised. Geri is not wingless. Geri is not struck. Geri is laconic. Kind things are hateful. Kimmie is caliginous.", "logic": "\nnot Narcotised(kimmie)\nWingless(kimmie)\nHateful(carlynn)\nCaliginous(carlynn)\nNarcotised(carlynn)\nHateful(geri)\nImplike(geri)\nnot Caliginous(geri)\nnot Narcotised(geri)\nnot Wingless(geri)\nnot Struck(geri)\nLaconic(geri)\nforall x (Caliginous(x) -> Hateful(x))\n\nCaliginous(kimmie)\n\nCaliginous(kimmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3697"} {"premises": "Nikos is sparkling. Jessie is ample. If something is sparkling then it is autocratic. If Nikos is begotten and Nikos is not sparkling then Nikos is not autocratic. Red, begotten things are jaundiced. Smart, begotten things are not jaundiced. If Nikos is autocratic then Nikos is begotten. If Nikos is sparkling and Nikos is not jaundiced then Nikos is privy. Nikos is sparkling.", "logic": "\nSparkling(nikos)\nAmple(jessie)\nforall x (Sparkling(x) -> Autocratic(x))\nBegotten(nikos) and not Sparkling(nikos) -> not Autocratic(nikos)\nforall x (Ample(x) and Begotten(x) -> Jaundiced(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) and Begotten(x) -> not Jaundiced(x))\nAutocratic(nikos) -> Begotten(nikos)\nSparkling(nikos) and not Jaundiced(nikos) -> Privy(nikos)\n\nSparkling(nikos)\n\ntherefore Sparkling(nikos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Nancee is subscript. Evan is coriaceous. If something is subscript then it is crucial. If Nancee is confused and Nancee is not subscript then Nancee is not crucial. Red, confused things are pliable. Smart, confused things are not pliable. If Nancee is crucial then Nancee is confused. If Nancee is subscript and Nancee is not pliable then Nancee is sepaline. Evan is not coriaceous.", "logic": "\nSubscript(nancee)\nCoriaceous(evan)\nforall x (Subscript(x) -> Crucial(x))\nConfused(nancee) and not Subscript(nancee) -> not Crucial(nancee)\nforall x (Coriaceous(x) and Confused(x) -> Pliable(x))\nforall x (Subscript(x) and Confused(x) -> not Pliable(x))\nCrucial(nancee) -> Confused(nancee)\nSubscript(nancee) and not Pliable(nancee) -> Sepaline(nancee)\n\nnot Coriaceous(evan)\n\ntherefore Coriaceous(evan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Issi is defensible. Temple is refractile. If something is defensible then it is welcome. If Issi is destroyed and Issi is not defensible then Issi is not welcome. Red, destroyed things are ringlike. Smart, destroyed things are not ringlike. If Issi is welcome then Issi is destroyed. If Issi is defensible and Issi is not ringlike then Issi is benighted. Issi is welcome.", "logic": "\nDefensible(issi)\nRefractile(temple)\nforall x (Defensible(x) -> Welcome(x))\nDestroyed(issi) and not Defensible(issi) -> not Welcome(issi)\nforall x (Refractile(x) and Destroyed(x) -> Ringlike(x))\nforall x (Defensible(x) and Destroyed(x) -> not Ringlike(x))\nWelcome(issi) -> Destroyed(issi)\nDefensible(issi) and not Ringlike(issi) -> Benighted(issi)\n\nWelcome(issi)\n\nDefensible(issi) and forall x (Defensible(x) -> Welcome(x)) -> therefore Welcome(issi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Nadeen is undersize. Goddart is puerile. If something is undersize then it is unsafe. If Nadeen is amazing and Nadeen is not undersize then Nadeen is not unsafe. Red, amazing things are recurvate. Smart, amazing things are not recurvate. If Nadeen is unsafe then Nadeen is amazing. If Nadeen is undersize and Nadeen is not recurvate then Nadeen is pareve. Nadeen is not unsafe.", "logic": "\nUndersize(nadeen)\nPuerile(goddart)\nforall x (Undersize(x) -> Unsafe(x))\nAmazing(nadeen) and not Undersize(nadeen) -> not Unsafe(nadeen)\nforall x (Puerile(x) and Amazing(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nforall x (Undersize(x) and Amazing(x) -> not Recurvate(x))\nUnsafe(nadeen) -> Amazing(nadeen)\nUndersize(nadeen) and not Recurvate(nadeen) -> Pareve(nadeen)\n\nnot Unsafe(nadeen)\n\nUndersize(nadeen) and forall x (Undersize(x) -> Unsafe(x)) -> therefore Unsafe(nadeen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Godfree is circuitous. Carie is textbook. If something is circuitous then it is ersatz. If Godfree is unanimous and Godfree is not circuitous then Godfree is not ersatz. Red, unanimous things are insurgent. Smart, unanimous things are not insurgent. If Godfree is ersatz then Godfree is unanimous. If Godfree is circuitous and Godfree is not insurgent then Godfree is woodsy. Godfree is unanimous.", "logic": "\nCircuitous(godfree)\nTextbook(carie)\nforall x (Circuitous(x) -> Ersatz(x))\nUnanimous(godfree) and not Circuitous(godfree) -> not Ersatz(godfree)\nforall x (Textbook(x) and Unanimous(x) -> Insurgent(x))\nforall x (Circuitous(x) and Unanimous(x) -> not Insurgent(x))\nErsatz(godfree) -> Unanimous(godfree)\nCircuitous(godfree) and not Insurgent(godfree) -> Woodsy(godfree)\n\nUnanimous(godfree)\n\nCircuitous(godfree) and forall x (Circuitous(x) -> Ersatz(x)) -> therefore Ersatz(godfree) Ersatz(godfree) and Ersatz(godfree) -> Unanimous(godfree) -> therefore Unanimous(godfree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Ceil is uncut. Ferdinand is genuine. If something is uncut then it is piratical. If Ceil is gummy and Ceil is not uncut then Ceil is not piratical. Red, gummy things are sottish. Smart, gummy things are not sottish. If Ceil is piratical then Ceil is gummy. If Ceil is uncut and Ceil is not sottish then Ceil is octangular. Ceil is not gummy.", "logic": "\nUncut(ceil)\nGenuine(ferdinand)\nforall x (Uncut(x) -> Piratical(x))\nGummy(ceil) and not Uncut(ceil) -> not Piratical(ceil)\nforall x (Genuine(x) and Gummy(x) -> Sottish(x))\nforall x (Uncut(x) and Gummy(x) -> not Sottish(x))\nPiratical(ceil) -> Gummy(ceil)\nUncut(ceil) and not Sottish(ceil) -> Octangular(ceil)\n\nnot Gummy(ceil)\n\nUncut(ceil) and forall x (Uncut(x) -> Piratical(x)) -> therefore Piratical(ceil) Piratical(ceil) and Piratical(ceil) -> Gummy(ceil) -> therefore Gummy(ceil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Connolly is shouldered. Winfield is unhewn. If something is shouldered then it is mono. If Connolly is deuced and Connolly is not shouldered then Connolly is not mono. Red, deuced things are ismaili. Smart, deuced things are not ismaili. If Connolly is mono then Connolly is deuced. If Connolly is shouldered and Connolly is not ismaili then Connolly is thirteenth. Connolly is not ismaili.", "logic": "\nShouldered(connolly)\nUnhewn(winfield)\nforall x (Shouldered(x) -> Mono(x))\nDeuced(connolly) and not Shouldered(connolly) -> not Mono(connolly)\nforall x (Unhewn(x) and Deuced(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nforall x (Shouldered(x) and Deuced(x) -> not Ismaili(x))\nMono(connolly) -> Deuced(connolly)\nShouldered(connolly) and not Ismaili(connolly) -> Thirteenth(connolly)\n\nnot Ismaili(connolly)\n\nShouldered(connolly) and forall x (Shouldered(x) -> Mono(x)) -> therefore Mono(connolly) Mono(connolly) and Mono(connolly) -> Deuced(connolly) -> therefore Deuced(connolly) Shouldered(connolly) and Deuced(connolly) and forall x (Shouldered(x) and Deuced(x) -> not Ismaili(x)) -> therefore not Ismaili(connolly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Karola is carnation. Stephanie is percipient. If something is carnation then it is nonviolent. If Karola is squawky and Karola is not carnation then Karola is not nonviolent. Red, squawky things are orange. Smart, squawky things are not orange. If Karola is nonviolent then Karola is squawky. If Karola is carnation and Karola is not orange then Karola is unratified. Karola is orange.", "logic": "\nCarnation(karola)\nPercipient(stephanie)\nforall x (Carnation(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\nSquawky(karola) and not Carnation(karola) -> not Nonviolent(karola)\nforall x (Percipient(x) and Squawky(x) -> Orange(x))\nforall x (Carnation(x) and Squawky(x) -> not Orange(x))\nNonviolent(karola) -> Squawky(karola)\nCarnation(karola) and not Orange(karola) -> Unratified(karola)\n\nOrange(karola)\n\nCarnation(karola) and forall x (Carnation(x) -> Nonviolent(x)) -> therefore Nonviolent(karola) Nonviolent(karola) and Nonviolent(karola) -> Squawky(karola) -> therefore Squawky(karola) Carnation(karola) and Squawky(karola) and forall x (Carnation(x) and Squawky(x) -> not Orange(x)) -> therefore not Orange(karola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Geraldine is hoarse. Guthrey is imputable. If something is hoarse then it is calculated. If Geraldine is rippled and Geraldine is not hoarse then Geraldine is not calculated. Red, rippled things are arrayed. Smart, rippled things are not arrayed. If Geraldine is calculated then Geraldine is rippled. If Geraldine is hoarse and Geraldine is not arrayed then Geraldine is ripened. Guthrey is not arrayed.", "logic": "\nHoarse(geraldine)\nImputable(guthrey)\nforall x (Hoarse(x) -> Calculated(x))\nRippled(geraldine) and not Hoarse(geraldine) -> not Calculated(geraldine)\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Rippled(x) -> Arrayed(x))\nforall x (Hoarse(x) and Rippled(x) -> not Arrayed(x))\nCalculated(geraldine) -> Rippled(geraldine)\nHoarse(geraldine) and not Arrayed(geraldine) -> Ripened(geraldine)\n\nnot Arrayed(guthrey)\n\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Rippled(x) -> Arrayed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Wes is bladelike. Romeo is current. If something is bladelike then it is unvigilant. If Wes is baleful and Wes is not bladelike then Wes is not unvigilant. Red, baleful things are depressing. Smart, baleful things are not depressing. If Wes is unvigilant then Wes is baleful. If Wes is bladelike and Wes is not depressing then Wes is unmovable. Romeo is unvigilant.", "logic": "\nBladelike(wes)\nCurrent(romeo)\nforall x (Bladelike(x) -> Unvigilant(x))\nBaleful(wes) and not Bladelike(wes) -> not Unvigilant(wes)\nforall x (Current(x) and Baleful(x) -> Depressing(x))\nforall x (Bladelike(x) and Baleful(x) -> not Depressing(x))\nUnvigilant(wes) -> Baleful(wes)\nBladelike(wes) and not Depressing(wes) -> Unmovable(wes)\n\nUnvigilant(romeo)\n\nforall x (Bladelike(x) -> Unvigilant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Issi is onetime. Mitch is arsenious. If something is onetime then it is plethoric. If Issi is traveled and Issi is not onetime then Issi is not plethoric. Red, traveled things are frowzy. Smart, traveled things are not frowzy. If Issi is plethoric then Issi is traveled. If Issi is onetime and Issi is not frowzy then Issi is inner. Mitch is not inner.", "logic": "\nOnetime(issi)\nArsenious(mitch)\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nTraveled(issi) and not Onetime(issi) -> not Plethoric(issi)\nforall x (Arsenious(x) and Traveled(x) -> Frowzy(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) and Traveled(x) -> not Frowzy(x))\nPlethoric(issi) -> Traveled(issi)\nOnetime(issi) and not Frowzy(issi) -> Inner(issi)\n\nnot Inner(mitch)\n\nnot Inner(mitch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Alicea is hearable. Geraldina is liege. If something is hearable then it is imposed. If Alicea is balsamic and Alicea is not hearable then Alicea is not imposed. Red, balsamic things are sloped. Smart, balsamic things are not sloped. If Alicea is imposed then Alicea is balsamic. If Alicea is hearable and Alicea is not sloped then Alicea is calcic. Geraldina is hearable.", "logic": "\nHearable(alicea)\nLiege(geraldina)\nforall x (Hearable(x) -> Imposed(x))\nBalsamic(alicea) and not Hearable(alicea) -> not Imposed(alicea)\nforall x (Liege(x) and Balsamic(x) -> Sloped(x))\nforall x (Hearable(x) and Balsamic(x) -> not Sloped(x))\nImposed(alicea) -> Balsamic(alicea)\nHearable(alicea) and not Sloped(alicea) -> Calcic(alicea)\n\nHearable(geraldina)\n\nHearable(geraldina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Renel is declared. Ulrich is wanton. If something is declared then it is rested. If Renel is seventy and Renel is not declared then Renel is not rested. Red, seventy things are aerophilic. Smart, seventy things are not aerophilic. If Renel is rested then Renel is seventy. If Renel is declared and Renel is not aerophilic then Renel is bubbly. Renel is not nice.", "logic": "\nDeclared(renel)\nWanton(ulrich)\nforall x (Declared(x) -> Rested(x))\nSeventy(renel) and not Declared(renel) -> not Rested(renel)\nforall x (Wanton(x) and Seventy(x) -> Aerophilic(x))\nforall x (Declared(x) and Seventy(x) -> not Aerophilic(x))\nRested(renel) -> Seventy(renel)\nDeclared(renel) and not Aerophilic(renel) -> Bubbly(renel)\n\nnot Nice(renel)\n\nnot Nice(renel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Ruthe is ceric. Broddie is eolithic. If something is ceric then it is avocado. If Ruthe is periodical and Ruthe is not ceric then Ruthe is not avocado. Red, periodical things are foaming. Smart, periodical things are not foaming. If Ruthe is avocado then Ruthe is periodical. If Ruthe is ceric and Ruthe is not foaming then Ruthe is bragging. Broddie is periodical.", "logic": "\nCeric(ruthe)\nEolithic(broddie)\nforall x (Ceric(x) -> Avocado(x))\nPeriodical(ruthe) and not Ceric(ruthe) -> not Avocado(ruthe)\nforall x (Eolithic(x) and Periodical(x) -> Foaming(x))\nforall x (Ceric(x) and Periodical(x) -> not Foaming(x))\nAvocado(ruthe) -> Periodical(ruthe)\nCeric(ruthe) and not Foaming(ruthe) -> Bragging(ruthe)\n\nPeriodical(broddie)\n\nPeriodical(broddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Erena is hydroxy. Lanie is catty. If something is hydroxy then it is unrivalled. If Erena is bumpkinly and Erena is not hydroxy then Erena is not unrivalled. Red, bumpkinly things are glistering. Smart, bumpkinly things are not glistering. If Erena is unrivalled then Erena is bumpkinly. If Erena is hydroxy and Erena is not glistering then Erena is grooved. Erena is not catty.", "logic": "\nHydroxy(erena)\nCatty(lanie)\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) -> Unrivalled(x))\nBumpkinly(erena) and not Hydroxy(erena) -> not Unrivalled(erena)\nforall x (Catty(x) and Bumpkinly(x) -> Glistering(x))\nforall x (Hydroxy(x) and Bumpkinly(x) -> not Glistering(x))\nUnrivalled(erena) -> Bumpkinly(erena)\nHydroxy(erena) and not Glistering(erena) -> Grooved(erena)\n\nnot Catty(erena)\n\nnot Catty(erena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "Moore is avellane. Merrily is essene. If something is avellane then it is computable. If Moore is dependant and Moore is not avellane then Moore is not computable. Red, dependant things are cuttable. Smart, dependant things are not cuttable. If Moore is computable then Moore is dependant. If Moore is avellane and Moore is not cuttable then Moore is probative. Merrily is nice.", "logic": "\nAvellane(moore)\nEssene(merrily)\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Computable(x))\nDependant(moore) and not Avellane(moore) -> not Computable(moore)\nforall x (Essene(x) and Dependant(x) -> Cuttable(x))\nforall x (Avellane(x) and Dependant(x) -> not Cuttable(x))\nComputable(moore) -> Dependant(moore)\nAvellane(moore) and not Cuttable(moore) -> Probative(moore)\n\nNice(merrily)\n\nNice(merrily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-991"} {"premises": "The kimmie flash the roxana. The kimmie shamble the giffie. The darcie flash the giffie. The giffie is armored. The roxana flash the kimmie. The roxana is transposed. The roxana shamble the kimmie. If someone shamble the giffie then they are lighted. If someone is armored then they need the giffie. If someone stutter the giffie then the giffie shamble the darcie. If someone stutter the roxana then the roxana is bareheaded. If someone shamble the roxana and the roxana stutter the giffie then the roxana stutter the kimmie. If someone stutter the darcie then the darcie is lighted. If someone is lighted then they eat the darcie. If someone is bareheaded and they need the roxana then the roxana stutter the kimmie. The kimmie flash the roxana.", "logic": "\nFlash(kimmie, roxana)\nShamble(kimmie, giffie)\nFlash(darcie, giffie)\nArmored(giffie)\nFlash(roxana, kimmie)\nTransposed(roxana)\nShamble(roxana, kimmie)\nforall x (Shamble(x, giffie) -> Lighted(x))\nforall x (Armored(x) -> Shamble(x, giffie))\nforall x (Stutter(x, giffie) -> Shamble(giffie, darcie))\nforall x (Stutter(x, roxana) -> Bareheaded(roxana))\nforall x (Shamble(x, roxana) and Stutter(roxana, giffie) -> Stutter(roxana, kimmie))\nforall x (Stutter(x, darcie) -> Lighted(darcie))\nforall x (Lighted(x) -> Flash(x, darcie))\nforall x (Bareheaded(x) and Shamble(x, roxana) -> Stutter(roxana, kimmie))\n\nFlash(kimmie, roxana)\n\ntherefore Flash(kimmie, roxana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The jarrett degust the gretta. The jarrett winkle the daveta. The sheilah degust the daveta. The daveta is perdurable. The gretta degust the jarrett. The gretta is fanlike. The gretta winkle the jarrett. If someone winkle the daveta then they are thracian. If someone is perdurable then they need the daveta. If someone deplane the daveta then the daveta winkle the sheilah. If someone deplane the gretta then the gretta is kafkaesque. If someone winkle the gretta and the gretta deplane the daveta then the gretta deplane the jarrett. If someone deplane the sheilah then the sheilah is thracian. If someone is thracian then they eat the sheilah. If someone is kafkaesque and they need the gretta then the gretta deplane the jarrett. The gretta does not need the jarrett.", "logic": "\nDegust(jarrett, gretta)\nWinkle(jarrett, daveta)\nDegust(sheilah, daveta)\nPerdurable(daveta)\nDegust(gretta, jarrett)\nFanlike(gretta)\nWinkle(gretta, jarrett)\nforall x (Winkle(x, daveta) -> Thracian(x))\nforall x (Perdurable(x) -> Winkle(x, daveta))\nforall x (Deplane(x, daveta) -> Winkle(daveta, sheilah))\nforall x (Deplane(x, gretta) -> Kafkaesque(gretta))\nforall x (Winkle(x, gretta) and Deplane(gretta, daveta) -> Deplane(gretta, jarrett))\nforall x (Deplane(x, sheilah) -> Thracian(sheilah))\nforall x (Thracian(x) -> Degust(x, sheilah))\nforall x (Kafkaesque(x) and Winkle(x, gretta) -> Deplane(gretta, jarrett))\n\nnot Winkle(gretta, jarrett)\n\ntherefore Winkle(gretta, jarrett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The eleanora melt the venita. The eleanora drown the kizzie. The tymothy melt the kizzie. The kizzie is heartsick. The venita melt the eleanora. The venita is latter. The venita drown the eleanora. If someone drown the kizzie then they are riblike. If someone is heartsick then they need the kizzie. If someone pock the kizzie then the kizzie drown the tymothy. If someone pock the venita then the venita is niffy. If someone drown the venita and the venita pock the kizzie then the venita pock the eleanora. If someone pock the tymothy then the tymothy is riblike. If someone is riblike then they eat the tymothy. If someone is niffy and they need the venita then the venita pock the eleanora. The eleanora is riblike.", "logic": "\nMelt(eleanora, venita)\nDrown(eleanora, kizzie)\nMelt(tymothy, kizzie)\nHeartsick(kizzie)\nMelt(venita, eleanora)\nLatter(venita)\nDrown(venita, eleanora)\nforall x (Drown(x, kizzie) -> Riblike(x))\nforall x (Heartsick(x) -> Drown(x, kizzie))\nforall x (Pock(x, kizzie) -> Drown(kizzie, tymothy))\nforall x (Pock(x, venita) -> Niffy(venita))\nforall x (Drown(x, venita) and Pock(venita, kizzie) -> Pock(venita, eleanora))\nforall x (Pock(x, tymothy) -> Riblike(tymothy))\nforall x (Riblike(x) -> Melt(x, tymothy))\nforall x (Niffy(x) and Drown(x, venita) -> Pock(venita, eleanora))\n\nRiblike(eleanora)\n\nDrown(eleanora, kizzie) and forall x (Drown(x, kizzie) -> Riblike(x)) -> therefore Riblike(eleanora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The adair alloy the kari. The adair debark the annamaria. The sarene alloy the annamaria. The annamaria is concurrent. The kari alloy the adair. The kari is staggering. The kari debark the adair. If someone debark the annamaria then they are semestrial. If someone is concurrent then they need the annamaria. If someone attune the annamaria then the annamaria debark the sarene. If someone attune the kari then the kari is anamorphic. If someone debark the kari and the kari attune the annamaria then the kari attune the adair. If someone attune the sarene then the sarene is semestrial. If someone is semestrial then they eat the sarene. If someone is anamorphic and they need the kari then the kari attune the adair. The adair is not semestrial.", "logic": "\nAlloy(adair, kari)\nDebark(adair, annamaria)\nAlloy(sarene, annamaria)\nConcurrent(annamaria)\nAlloy(kari, adair)\nStaggering(kari)\nDebark(kari, adair)\nforall x (Debark(x, annamaria) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Concurrent(x) -> Debark(x, annamaria))\nforall x (Attune(x, annamaria) -> Debark(annamaria, sarene))\nforall x (Attune(x, kari) -> Anamorphic(kari))\nforall x (Debark(x, kari) and Attune(kari, annamaria) -> Attune(kari, adair))\nforall x (Attune(x, sarene) -> Semestrial(sarene))\nforall x (Semestrial(x) -> Alloy(x, sarene))\nforall x (Anamorphic(x) and Debark(x, kari) -> Attune(kari, adair))\n\nnot Semestrial(adair)\n\nDebark(adair, annamaria) and forall x (Debark(x, annamaria) -> Semestrial(x)) -> therefore Semestrial(adair)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The merwin delimitate the enrika. The merwin dispossess the carolin. The prue delimitate the carolin. The carolin is sequential. The enrika delimitate the merwin. The enrika is insane. The enrika dispossess the merwin. If someone dispossess the carolin then they are twelve. If someone is sequential then they need the carolin. If someone shorten the carolin then the carolin dispossess the prue. If someone shorten the enrika then the enrika is senescent. If someone dispossess the enrika and the enrika shorten the carolin then the enrika shorten the merwin. If someone shorten the prue then the prue is twelve. If someone is twelve then they eat the prue. If someone is senescent and they need the enrika then the enrika shorten the merwin. The merwin delimitate the prue.", "logic": "\nDelimitate(merwin, enrika)\nDispossess(merwin, carolin)\nDelimitate(prue, carolin)\nSequential(carolin)\nDelimitate(enrika, merwin)\nInsane(enrika)\nDispossess(enrika, merwin)\nforall x (Dispossess(x, carolin) -> Twelve(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Dispossess(x, carolin))\nforall x (Shorten(x, carolin) -> Dispossess(carolin, prue))\nforall x (Shorten(x, enrika) -> Senescent(enrika))\nforall x (Dispossess(x, enrika) and Shorten(enrika, carolin) -> Shorten(enrika, merwin))\nforall x (Shorten(x, prue) -> Twelve(prue))\nforall x (Twelve(x) -> Delimitate(x, prue))\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Dispossess(x, enrika) -> Shorten(enrika, merwin))\n\nDelimitate(merwin, prue)\n\nDispossess(merwin, carolin) and forall x (Dispossess(x, carolin) -> Twelve(x)) -> therefore Twelve(merwin) Twelve(merwin) and forall x (Twelve(x) -> Delimitate(x, prue)) -> therefore Delimitate(merwin, prue)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The trent force the shari. The trent ensue the knox. The sher force the knox. The knox is intrepid. The shari force the trent. The shari is operable. The shari ensue the trent. If someone ensue the knox then they are grasping. If someone is intrepid then they need the knox. If someone addle the knox then the knox ensue the sher. If someone addle the shari then the shari is squirting. If someone ensue the shari and the shari addle the knox then the shari addle the trent. If someone addle the sher then the sher is grasping. If someone is grasping then they eat the sher. If someone is squirting and they need the shari then the shari addle the trent. The knox is not grasping.", "logic": "\nForce(trent, shari)\nEnsue(trent, knox)\nForce(sher, knox)\nIntrepid(knox)\nForce(shari, trent)\nOperable(shari)\nEnsue(shari, trent)\nforall x (Ensue(x, knox) -> Grasping(x))\nforall x (Intrepid(x) -> Ensue(x, knox))\nforall x (Addle(x, knox) -> Ensue(knox, sher))\nforall x (Addle(x, shari) -> Squirting(shari))\nforall x (Ensue(x, shari) and Addle(shari, knox) -> Addle(shari, trent))\nforall x (Addle(x, sher) -> Grasping(sher))\nforall x (Grasping(x) -> Force(x, sher))\nforall x (Squirting(x) and Ensue(x, shari) -> Addle(shari, trent))\n\nnot Grasping(knox)\n\nIntrepid(knox) and forall x (Intrepid(x) -> Ensue(x, knox)) -> therefore Ensue(knox, knox) Ensue(knox, knox) and forall x (Ensue(x, knox) -> Grasping(x)) -> therefore Grasping(knox)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The dita grovel the mateo. The dita peer the amandi. The jenny grovel the amandi. The amandi is opaque. The mateo grovel the dita. The mateo is likeable. The mateo peer the dita. If someone peer the amandi then they are joking. If someone is opaque then they need the amandi. If someone copyedit the amandi then the amandi peer the jenny. If someone copyedit the mateo then the mateo is innoxious. If someone peer the mateo and the mateo copyedit the amandi then the mateo copyedit the dita. If someone copyedit the jenny then the jenny is joking. If someone is joking then they eat the jenny. If someone is innoxious and they need the mateo then the mateo copyedit the dita. The amandi grovel the jenny.", "logic": "\nGrovel(dita, mateo)\nPeer(dita, amandi)\nGrovel(jenny, amandi)\nOpaque(amandi)\nGrovel(mateo, dita)\nLikeable(mateo)\nPeer(mateo, dita)\nforall x (Peer(x, amandi) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Opaque(x) -> Peer(x, amandi))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, amandi) -> Peer(amandi, jenny))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, mateo) -> Innoxious(mateo))\nforall x (Peer(x, mateo) and Copyedit(mateo, amandi) -> Copyedit(mateo, dita))\nforall x (Copyedit(x, jenny) -> Joking(jenny))\nforall x (Joking(x) -> Grovel(x, jenny))\nforall x (Innoxious(x) and Peer(x, mateo) -> Copyedit(mateo, dita))\n\nGrovel(amandi, jenny)\n\nOpaque(amandi) and forall x (Opaque(x) -> Peer(x, amandi)) -> therefore Peer(amandi, amandi) Peer(amandi, amandi) and forall x (Peer(x, amandi) -> Joking(x)) -> therefore Joking(amandi) Joking(amandi) and forall x (Joking(x) -> Grovel(x, jenny)) -> therefore Grovel(amandi, jenny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The mattie whop the flipper. The mattie waterproof the barb. The kare whop the barb. The barb is seagoing. The flipper whop the mattie. The flipper is choppy. The flipper waterproof the mattie. If someone waterproof the barb then they are applied. If someone is seagoing then they need the barb. If someone suckle the barb then the barb waterproof the kare. If someone suckle the flipper then the flipper is jaundiced. If someone waterproof the flipper and the flipper suckle the barb then the flipper suckle the mattie. If someone suckle the kare then the kare is applied. If someone is applied then they eat the kare. If someone is jaundiced and they need the flipper then the flipper suckle the mattie. The barb does not eat the kare.", "logic": "\nWhop(mattie, flipper)\nWaterproof(mattie, barb)\nWhop(kare, barb)\nSeagoing(barb)\nWhop(flipper, mattie)\nChoppy(flipper)\nWaterproof(flipper, mattie)\nforall x (Waterproof(x, barb) -> Applied(x))\nforall x (Seagoing(x) -> Waterproof(x, barb))\nforall x (Suckle(x, barb) -> Waterproof(barb, kare))\nforall x (Suckle(x, flipper) -> Jaundiced(flipper))\nforall x (Waterproof(x, flipper) and Suckle(flipper, barb) -> Suckle(flipper, mattie))\nforall x (Suckle(x, kare) -> Applied(kare))\nforall x (Applied(x) -> Whop(x, kare))\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) and Waterproof(x, flipper) -> Suckle(flipper, mattie))\n\nnot Whop(barb, kare)\n\nSeagoing(barb) and forall x (Seagoing(x) -> Waterproof(x, barb)) -> therefore Waterproof(barb, barb) Waterproof(barb, barb) and forall x (Waterproof(x, barb) -> Applied(x)) -> therefore Applied(barb) Applied(barb) and forall x (Applied(x) -> Whop(x, kare)) -> therefore Whop(barb, kare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The oran squabble the jelene. The oran clash the ninnette. The kirbee squabble the ninnette. The ninnette is pursy. The jelene squabble the oran. The jelene is aboveboard. The jelene clash the oran. If someone clash the ninnette then they are igneous. If someone is pursy then they need the ninnette. If someone throne the ninnette then the ninnette clash the kirbee. If someone throne the jelene then the jelene is petalled. If someone clash the jelene and the jelene throne the ninnette then the jelene throne the oran. If someone throne the kirbee then the kirbee is igneous. If someone is igneous then they eat the kirbee. If someone is petalled and they need the jelene then the jelene throne the oran. The kirbee is not igneous.", "logic": "\nSquabble(oran, jelene)\nClash(oran, ninnette)\nSquabble(kirbee, ninnette)\nPursy(ninnette)\nSquabble(jelene, oran)\nAboveboard(jelene)\nClash(jelene, oran)\nforall x (Clash(x, ninnette) -> Igneous(x))\nforall x (Pursy(x) -> Clash(x, ninnette))\nforall x (Throne(x, ninnette) -> Clash(ninnette, kirbee))\nforall x (Throne(x, jelene) -> Petalled(jelene))\nforall x (Clash(x, jelene) and Throne(jelene, ninnette) -> Throne(jelene, oran))\nforall x (Throne(x, kirbee) -> Igneous(kirbee))\nforall x (Igneous(x) -> Squabble(x, kirbee))\nforall x (Petalled(x) and Clash(x, jelene) -> Throne(jelene, oran))\n\nnot Igneous(kirbee)\n\nforall x (Clash(x, ninnette) -> Igneous(x)) <- forall x (Pursy(x) -> Clash(x, ninnette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The elsinore camber the glynda. The elsinore mesh the maritsa. The adolphe camber the maritsa. The maritsa is kindly. The glynda camber the elsinore. The glynda is aegean. The glynda mesh the elsinore. If someone mesh the maritsa then they are stained. If someone is kindly then they need the maritsa. If someone shade the maritsa then the maritsa mesh the adolphe. If someone shade the glynda then the glynda is memorable. If someone mesh the glynda and the glynda shade the maritsa then the glynda shade the elsinore. If someone shade the adolphe then the adolphe is stained. If someone is stained then they eat the adolphe. If someone is memorable and they need the glynda then the glynda shade the elsinore. The glynda is stained.", "logic": "\nCamber(elsinore, glynda)\nMesh(elsinore, maritsa)\nCamber(adolphe, maritsa)\nKindly(maritsa)\nCamber(glynda, elsinore)\nAegean(glynda)\nMesh(glynda, elsinore)\nforall x (Mesh(x, maritsa) -> Stained(x))\nforall x (Kindly(x) -> Mesh(x, maritsa))\nforall x (Shade(x, maritsa) -> Mesh(maritsa, adolphe))\nforall x (Shade(x, glynda) -> Memorable(glynda))\nforall x (Mesh(x, glynda) and Shade(glynda, maritsa) -> Shade(glynda, elsinore))\nforall x (Shade(x, adolphe) -> Stained(adolphe))\nforall x (Stained(x) -> Camber(x, adolphe))\nforall x (Memorable(x) and Mesh(x, glynda) -> Shade(glynda, elsinore))\n\nStained(glynda)\n\nforall x (Mesh(x, maritsa) -> Stained(x)) <- forall x (Kindly(x) -> Mesh(x, maritsa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The katrina federalise the elnar. The katrina constipate the livia. The kathlin federalise the livia. The livia is catchy. The elnar federalise the katrina. The elnar is rickety. The elnar constipate the katrina. If someone constipate the livia then they are edible. If someone is catchy then they need the livia. If someone prang the livia then the livia constipate the kathlin. If someone prang the elnar then the elnar is admittible. If someone constipate the elnar and the elnar prang the livia then the elnar prang the katrina. If someone prang the kathlin then the kathlin is edible. If someone is edible then they eat the kathlin. If someone is admittible and they need the elnar then the elnar prang the katrina. The kathlin does not eat the kathlin.", "logic": "\nFederalise(katrina, elnar)\nConstipate(katrina, livia)\nFederalise(kathlin, livia)\nCatchy(livia)\nFederalise(elnar, katrina)\nRickety(elnar)\nConstipate(elnar, katrina)\nforall x (Constipate(x, livia) -> Edible(x))\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Constipate(x, livia))\nforall x (Prang(x, livia) -> Constipate(livia, kathlin))\nforall x (Prang(x, elnar) -> Admittible(elnar))\nforall x (Constipate(x, elnar) and Prang(elnar, livia) -> Prang(elnar, katrina))\nforall x (Prang(x, kathlin) -> Edible(kathlin))\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Federalise(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Admittible(x) and Constipate(x, elnar) -> Prang(elnar, katrina))\n\nnot Federalise(kathlin, kathlin)\n\nforall x (Edible(x) -> Federalise(x, kathlin)) <- forall x (Constipate(x, livia) -> Edible(x)) <- forall x (Catchy(x) -> Constipate(x, livia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The helli epitomise the arlina. The helli enlarge the prent. The clara epitomise the prent. The prent is prideful. The arlina epitomise the helli. The arlina is shrieked. The arlina enlarge the helli. If someone enlarge the prent then they are dire. If someone is prideful then they need the prent. If someone lengthen the prent then the prent enlarge the clara. If someone lengthen the arlina then the arlina is adaptable. If someone enlarge the arlina and the arlina lengthen the prent then the arlina lengthen the helli. If someone lengthen the clara then the clara is dire. If someone is dire then they eat the clara. If someone is adaptable and they need the arlina then the arlina lengthen the helli. The arlina lengthen the helli.", "logic": "\nEpitomise(helli, arlina)\nEnlarge(helli, prent)\nEpitomise(clara, prent)\nPrideful(prent)\nEpitomise(arlina, helli)\nShrieked(arlina)\nEnlarge(arlina, helli)\nforall x (Enlarge(x, prent) -> Dire(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) -> Enlarge(x, prent))\nforall x (Lengthen(x, prent) -> Enlarge(prent, clara))\nforall x (Lengthen(x, arlina) -> Adaptable(arlina))\nforall x (Enlarge(x, arlina) and Lengthen(arlina, prent) -> Lengthen(arlina, helli))\nforall x (Lengthen(x, clara) -> Dire(clara))\nforall x (Dire(x) -> Epitomise(x, clara))\nforall x (Adaptable(x) and Enlarge(x, arlina) -> Lengthen(arlina, helli))\n\nLengthen(arlina, helli)\n\nforall x (Enlarge(x, arlina) and Lengthen(arlina, prent) -> Lengthen(arlina, helli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The sybyl suture the nelia. The sybyl whomp the katlin. The chrissa suture the katlin. The katlin is sunk. The nelia suture the sybyl. The nelia is vulval. The nelia whomp the sybyl. If someone whomp the katlin then they are thankless. If someone is sunk then they need the katlin. If someone memorize the katlin then the katlin whomp the chrissa. If someone memorize the nelia then the nelia is sandaled. If someone whomp the nelia and the nelia memorize the katlin then the nelia memorize the sybyl. If someone memorize the chrissa then the chrissa is thankless. If someone is thankless then they eat the chrissa. If someone is sandaled and they need the nelia then the nelia memorize the sybyl. The katlin does not chase the chrissa.", "logic": "\nSuture(sybyl, nelia)\nWhomp(sybyl, katlin)\nSuture(chrissa, katlin)\nSunk(katlin)\nSuture(nelia, sybyl)\nVulval(nelia)\nWhomp(nelia, sybyl)\nforall x (Whomp(x, katlin) -> Thankless(x))\nforall x (Sunk(x) -> Whomp(x, katlin))\nforall x (Memorize(x, katlin) -> Whomp(katlin, chrissa))\nforall x (Memorize(x, nelia) -> Sandaled(nelia))\nforall x (Whomp(x, nelia) and Memorize(nelia, katlin) -> Memorize(nelia, sybyl))\nforall x (Memorize(x, chrissa) -> Thankless(chrissa))\nforall x (Thankless(x) -> Suture(x, chrissa))\nforall x (Sandaled(x) and Whomp(x, nelia) -> Memorize(nelia, sybyl))\n\nnot Memorize(katlin, chrissa)\n\nnot Memorize(katlin, chrissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The templeton ginger the ingemar. The templeton ozonize the marthena. The charyl ginger the marthena. The marthena is evidenced. The ingemar ginger the templeton. The ingemar is unreached. The ingemar ozonize the templeton. If someone ozonize the marthena then they are malefic. If someone is evidenced then they need the marthena. If someone shred the marthena then the marthena ozonize the charyl. If someone shred the ingemar then the ingemar is tenacious. If someone ozonize the ingemar and the ingemar shred the marthena then the ingemar shred the templeton. If someone shred the charyl then the charyl is malefic. If someone is malefic then they eat the charyl. If someone is tenacious and they need the ingemar then the ingemar shred the templeton. The charyl is tenacious.", "logic": "\nGinger(templeton, ingemar)\nOzonize(templeton, marthena)\nGinger(charyl, marthena)\nEvidenced(marthena)\nGinger(ingemar, templeton)\nUnreached(ingemar)\nOzonize(ingemar, templeton)\nforall x (Ozonize(x, marthena) -> Malefic(x))\nforall x (Evidenced(x) -> Ozonize(x, marthena))\nforall x (Shred(x, marthena) -> Ozonize(marthena, charyl))\nforall x (Shred(x, ingemar) -> Tenacious(ingemar))\nforall x (Ozonize(x, ingemar) and Shred(ingemar, marthena) -> Shred(ingemar, templeton))\nforall x (Shred(x, charyl) -> Malefic(charyl))\nforall x (Malefic(x) -> Ginger(x, charyl))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) and Ozonize(x, ingemar) -> Shred(ingemar, templeton))\n\nTenacious(charyl)\n\nTenacious(charyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The karlotta suppose the nannette. The karlotta batten the jerome. The janis suppose the jerome. The jerome is mangy. The nannette suppose the karlotta. The nannette is mongol. The nannette batten the karlotta. If someone batten the jerome then they are tentative. If someone is mangy then they need the jerome. If someone enchain the jerome then the jerome batten the janis. If someone enchain the nannette then the nannette is netted. If someone batten the nannette and the nannette enchain the jerome then the nannette enchain the karlotta. If someone enchain the janis then the janis is tentative. If someone is tentative then they eat the janis. If someone is netted and they need the nannette then the nannette enchain the karlotta. The janis does not need the karlotta.", "logic": "\nSuppose(karlotta, nannette)\nBatten(karlotta, jerome)\nSuppose(janis, jerome)\nMangy(jerome)\nSuppose(nannette, karlotta)\nMongol(nannette)\nBatten(nannette, karlotta)\nforall x (Batten(x, jerome) -> Tentative(x))\nforall x (Mangy(x) -> Batten(x, jerome))\nforall x (Enchain(x, jerome) -> Batten(jerome, janis))\nforall x (Enchain(x, nannette) -> Netted(nannette))\nforall x (Batten(x, nannette) and Enchain(nannette, jerome) -> Enchain(nannette, karlotta))\nforall x (Enchain(x, janis) -> Tentative(janis))\nforall x (Tentative(x) -> Suppose(x, janis))\nforall x (Netted(x) and Batten(x, nannette) -> Enchain(nannette, karlotta))\n\nnot Batten(janis, karlotta)\n\nnot Batten(janis, karlotta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The erhart drydock the julienne. The erhart overlook the johann. The celestia drydock the johann. The johann is eutherian. The julienne drydock the erhart. The julienne is surpassing. The julienne overlook the erhart. If someone overlook the johann then they are hoary. If someone is eutherian then they need the johann. If someone rubify the johann then the johann overlook the celestia. If someone rubify the julienne then the julienne is delinquent. If someone overlook the julienne and the julienne rubify the johann then the julienne rubify the erhart. If someone rubify the celestia then the celestia is hoary. If someone is hoary then they eat the celestia. If someone is delinquent and they need the julienne then the julienne rubify the erhart. The julienne rubify the johann.", "logic": "\nDrydock(erhart, julienne)\nOverlook(erhart, johann)\nDrydock(celestia, johann)\nEutherian(johann)\nDrydock(julienne, erhart)\nSurpassing(julienne)\nOverlook(julienne, erhart)\nforall x (Overlook(x, johann) -> Hoary(x))\nforall x (Eutherian(x) -> Overlook(x, johann))\nforall x (Rubify(x, johann) -> Overlook(johann, celestia))\nforall x (Rubify(x, julienne) -> Delinquent(julienne))\nforall x (Overlook(x, julienne) and Rubify(julienne, johann) -> Rubify(julienne, erhart))\nforall x (Rubify(x, celestia) -> Hoary(celestia))\nforall x (Hoary(x) -> Drydock(x, celestia))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) and Overlook(x, julienne) -> Rubify(julienne, erhart))\n\nRubify(julienne, johann)\n\nRubify(julienne, johann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-297"} {"premises": "The temp compromise the forrest. The forrest mesh the temp. The judie compromise the temp. If someone is desiccated then they like the temp. If someone compromise the forrest then the forrest mesh the judie. If someone is desiccated and they eat the judie then they need the forrest. If someone emplane the forrest and the forrest compromise the temp then the temp compromise the judie. If someone compromise the forrest and the forrest mesh the temp then they are desiccated. If someone emplane the temp then they are biotitic. If someone emplane the temp then they need the forrest. If someone compromise the temp then the temp emplane the judie. The temp compromise the forrest.", "logic": "\nCompromise(temp, forrest)\nMesh(forrest, temp)\nCompromise(judie, temp)\nforall x (Desiccated(x) -> Emplane(x, temp))\nforall x (Compromise(x, forrest) -> Mesh(forrest, judie))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and Compromise(x, judie) -> Mesh(x, forrest))\nforall x (Emplane(x, forrest) and Compromise(forrest, temp) -> Compromise(temp, judie))\nforall x (Compromise(x, forrest) and Mesh(forrest, temp) -> Desiccated(x))\nforall x (Emplane(x, temp) -> Biotitic(x))\nforall x (Emplane(x, temp) -> Mesh(x, forrest))\nforall x (Compromise(x, temp) -> Emplane(temp, judie))\n\nCompromise(temp, forrest)\n\ntherefore Compromise(temp, forrest)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The ximenez muddle the velma. The velma commit the ximenez. The nell muddle the ximenez. If someone is sleazy then they like the ximenez. If someone muddle the velma then the velma commit the nell. If someone is sleazy and they eat the nell then they need the velma. If someone pomade the velma and the velma muddle the ximenez then the ximenez muddle the nell. If someone muddle the velma and the velma commit the ximenez then they are sleazy. If someone pomade the ximenez then they are imperfect. If someone pomade the ximenez then they need the velma. If someone muddle the ximenez then the ximenez pomade the nell. The ximenez does not eat the velma.", "logic": "\nMuddle(ximenez, velma)\nCommit(velma, ximenez)\nMuddle(nell, ximenez)\nforall x (Sleazy(x) -> Pomade(x, ximenez))\nforall x (Muddle(x, velma) -> Commit(velma, nell))\nforall x (Sleazy(x) and Muddle(x, nell) -> Commit(x, velma))\nforall x (Pomade(x, velma) and Muddle(velma, ximenez) -> Muddle(ximenez, nell))\nforall x (Muddle(x, velma) and Commit(velma, ximenez) -> Sleazy(x))\nforall x (Pomade(x, ximenez) -> Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Pomade(x, ximenez) -> Commit(x, velma))\nforall x (Muddle(x, ximenez) -> Pomade(ximenez, nell))\n\nnot Muddle(ximenez, velma)\n\ntherefore Muddle(ximenez, velma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The kiele penetrate the monique. The monique apperceive the kiele. The kurtis penetrate the kiele. If someone is gluey then they like the kiele. If someone penetrate the monique then the monique apperceive the kurtis. If someone is gluey and they eat the kurtis then they need the monique. If someone thank the monique and the monique penetrate the kiele then the kiele penetrate the kurtis. If someone penetrate the monique and the monique apperceive the kiele then they are gluey. If someone thank the kiele then they are diamantine. If someone thank the kiele then they need the monique. If someone penetrate the kiele then the kiele thank the kurtis. The monique apperceive the kurtis.", "logic": "\nPenetrate(kiele, monique)\nApperceive(monique, kiele)\nPenetrate(kurtis, kiele)\nforall x (Gluey(x) -> Thank(x, kiele))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, monique) -> Apperceive(monique, kurtis))\nforall x (Gluey(x) and Penetrate(x, kurtis) -> Apperceive(x, monique))\nforall x (Thank(x, monique) and Penetrate(monique, kiele) -> Penetrate(kiele, kurtis))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, monique) and Apperceive(monique, kiele) -> Gluey(x))\nforall x (Thank(x, kiele) -> Diamantine(x))\nforall x (Thank(x, kiele) -> Apperceive(x, monique))\nforall x (Penetrate(x, kiele) -> Thank(kiele, kurtis))\n\nApperceive(monique, kurtis)\n\nPenetrate(kiele, monique) and forall x (Penetrate(x, monique) -> Apperceive(monique, kurtis)) -> therefore Apperceive(monique, kurtis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The keeley streamline the dacy. The dacy pester the keeley. The emmalyn streamline the keeley. If someone is bigmouthed then they like the keeley. If someone streamline the dacy then the dacy pester the emmalyn. If someone is bigmouthed and they eat the emmalyn then they need the dacy. If someone holystone the dacy and the dacy streamline the keeley then the keeley streamline the emmalyn. If someone streamline the dacy and the dacy pester the keeley then they are bigmouthed. If someone holystone the keeley then they are dressed. If someone holystone the keeley then they need the dacy. If someone streamline the keeley then the keeley holystone the emmalyn. The keeley is not bigmouthed.", "logic": "\nStreamline(keeley, dacy)\nPester(dacy, keeley)\nStreamline(emmalyn, keeley)\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Holystone(x, keeley))\nforall x (Streamline(x, dacy) -> Pester(dacy, emmalyn))\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) and Streamline(x, emmalyn) -> Pester(x, dacy))\nforall x (Holystone(x, dacy) and Streamline(dacy, keeley) -> Streamline(keeley, emmalyn))\nforall x (Streamline(x, dacy) and Pester(dacy, keeley) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nforall x (Holystone(x, keeley) -> Dressed(x))\nforall x (Holystone(x, keeley) -> Pester(x, dacy))\nforall x (Streamline(x, keeley) -> Holystone(keeley, emmalyn))\n\nnot Bigmouthed(keeley)\n\nStreamline(keeley, dacy) and Pester(dacy, keeley) and forall x (Streamline(x, dacy) and Pester(dacy, keeley) -> Bigmouthed(x)) -> therefore Bigmouthed(keeley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The carmina flunk the vanda. The vanda renege the carmina. The felicia flunk the carmina. If someone is discoid then they like the carmina. If someone flunk the vanda then the vanda renege the felicia. If someone is discoid and they eat the felicia then they need the vanda. If someone correct the vanda and the vanda flunk the carmina then the carmina flunk the felicia. If someone flunk the vanda and the vanda renege the carmina then they are discoid. If someone correct the carmina then they are actionable. If someone correct the carmina then they need the vanda. If someone flunk the carmina then the carmina correct the felicia. The carmina correct the carmina.", "logic": "\nFlunk(carmina, vanda)\nRenege(vanda, carmina)\nFlunk(felicia, carmina)\nforall x (Discoid(x) -> Correct(x, carmina))\nforall x (Flunk(x, vanda) -> Renege(vanda, felicia))\nforall x (Discoid(x) and Flunk(x, felicia) -> Renege(x, vanda))\nforall x (Correct(x, vanda) and Flunk(vanda, carmina) -> Flunk(carmina, felicia))\nforall x (Flunk(x, vanda) and Renege(vanda, carmina) -> Discoid(x))\nforall x (Correct(x, carmina) -> Actionable(x))\nforall x (Correct(x, carmina) -> Renege(x, vanda))\nforall x (Flunk(x, carmina) -> Correct(carmina, felicia))\n\nCorrect(carmina, carmina)\n\nFlunk(carmina, vanda) and Renege(vanda, carmina) and forall x (Flunk(x, vanda) and Renege(vanda, carmina) -> Discoid(x)) -> therefore Discoid(carmina) Discoid(carmina) and forall x (Discoid(x) -> Correct(x, carmina)) -> therefore Correct(carmina, carmina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The francisco bedevil the emlynne. The emlynne dehumanise the francisco. The theodoric bedevil the francisco. If someone is repellant then they like the francisco. If someone bedevil the emlynne then the emlynne dehumanise the theodoric. If someone is repellant and they eat the theodoric then they need the emlynne. If someone spike the emlynne and the emlynne bedevil the francisco then the francisco bedevil the theodoric. If someone bedevil the emlynne and the emlynne dehumanise the francisco then they are repellant. If someone spike the francisco then they are dual. If someone spike the francisco then they need the emlynne. If someone bedevil the francisco then the francisco spike the theodoric. The francisco does not like the francisco.", "logic": "\nBedevil(francisco, emlynne)\nDehumanise(emlynne, francisco)\nBedevil(theodoric, francisco)\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Spike(x, francisco))\nforall x (Bedevil(x, emlynne) -> Dehumanise(emlynne, theodoric))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and Bedevil(x, theodoric) -> Dehumanise(x, emlynne))\nforall x (Spike(x, emlynne) and Bedevil(emlynne, francisco) -> Bedevil(francisco, theodoric))\nforall x (Bedevil(x, emlynne) and Dehumanise(emlynne, francisco) -> Repellant(x))\nforall x (Spike(x, francisco) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Spike(x, francisco) -> Dehumanise(x, emlynne))\nforall x (Bedevil(x, francisco) -> Spike(francisco, theodoric))\n\nnot Spike(francisco, francisco)\n\nBedevil(francisco, emlynne) and Dehumanise(emlynne, francisco) and forall x (Bedevil(x, emlynne) and Dehumanise(emlynne, francisco) -> Repellant(x)) -> therefore Repellant(francisco) Repellant(francisco) and forall x (Repellant(x) -> Spike(x, francisco)) -> therefore Spike(francisco, francisco)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The samuela bestride the sumner. The sumner befriend the samuela. The gillan bestride the samuela. If someone is shuddery then they like the samuela. If someone bestride the sumner then the sumner befriend the gillan. If someone is shuddery and they eat the gillan then they need the sumner. If someone abrase the sumner and the sumner bestride the samuela then the samuela bestride the gillan. If someone bestride the sumner and the sumner befriend the samuela then they are shuddery. If someone abrase the samuela then they are human. If someone abrase the samuela then they need the sumner. If someone bestride the samuela then the samuela abrase the gillan. The samuela befriend the sumner.", "logic": "\nBestride(samuela, sumner)\nBefriend(sumner, samuela)\nBestride(gillan, samuela)\nforall x (Shuddery(x) -> Abrase(x, samuela))\nforall x (Bestride(x, sumner) -> Befriend(sumner, gillan))\nforall x (Shuddery(x) and Bestride(x, gillan) -> Befriend(x, sumner))\nforall x (Abrase(x, sumner) and Bestride(sumner, samuela) -> Bestride(samuela, gillan))\nforall x (Bestride(x, sumner) and Befriend(sumner, samuela) -> Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Abrase(x, samuela) -> Human(x))\nforall x (Abrase(x, samuela) -> Befriend(x, sumner))\nforall x (Bestride(x, samuela) -> Abrase(samuela, gillan))\n\nBefriend(samuela, sumner)\n\nBestride(samuela, sumner) and Befriend(sumner, samuela) and forall x (Bestride(x, sumner) and Befriend(sumner, samuela) -> Shuddery(x)) -> therefore Shuddery(samuela) Shuddery(samuela) and forall x (Shuddery(x) -> Abrase(x, samuela)) -> therefore Abrase(samuela, samuela) Abrase(samuela, samuela) and forall x (Abrase(x, samuela) -> Befriend(x, sumner)) -> therefore Befriend(samuela, sumner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The cory contemn the tirrell. The tirrell heal the cory. The barbra contemn the cory. If someone is shiftless then they like the cory. If someone contemn the tirrell then the tirrell heal the barbra. If someone is shiftless and they eat the barbra then they need the tirrell. If someone falsify the tirrell and the tirrell contemn the cory then the cory contemn the barbra. If someone contemn the tirrell and the tirrell heal the cory then they are shiftless. If someone falsify the cory then they are hirsute. If someone falsify the cory then they need the tirrell. If someone contemn the cory then the cory falsify the barbra. The cory is not hirsute.", "logic": "\nContemn(cory, tirrell)\nHeal(tirrell, cory)\nContemn(barbra, cory)\nforall x (Shiftless(x) -> Falsify(x, cory))\nforall x (Contemn(x, tirrell) -> Heal(tirrell, barbra))\nforall x (Shiftless(x) and Contemn(x, barbra) -> Heal(x, tirrell))\nforall x (Falsify(x, tirrell) and Contemn(tirrell, cory) -> Contemn(cory, barbra))\nforall x (Contemn(x, tirrell) and Heal(tirrell, cory) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Falsify(x, cory) -> Hirsute(x))\nforall x (Falsify(x, cory) -> Heal(x, tirrell))\nforall x (Contemn(x, cory) -> Falsify(cory, barbra))\n\nnot Hirsute(cory)\n\nContemn(cory, tirrell) and Heal(tirrell, cory) and forall x (Contemn(x, tirrell) and Heal(tirrell, cory) -> Shiftless(x)) -> therefore Shiftless(cory) Shiftless(cory) and forall x (Shiftless(x) -> Falsify(x, cory)) -> therefore Falsify(cory, cory) Falsify(cory, cory) and forall x (Falsify(x, cory) -> Hirsute(x)) -> therefore Hirsute(cory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The vernen broach the berchtold. The berchtold tariff the vernen. The haydon broach the vernen. If someone is sepaline then they like the vernen. If someone broach the berchtold then the berchtold tariff the haydon. If someone is sepaline and they eat the haydon then they need the berchtold. If someone prostitute the berchtold and the berchtold broach the vernen then the vernen broach the haydon. If someone broach the berchtold and the berchtold tariff the vernen then they are sepaline. If someone prostitute the vernen then they are absurd. If someone prostitute the vernen then they need the berchtold. If someone broach the vernen then the vernen prostitute the haydon. The haydon is not sepaline.", "logic": "\nBroach(vernen, berchtold)\nTariff(berchtold, vernen)\nBroach(haydon, vernen)\nforall x (Sepaline(x) -> Prostitute(x, vernen))\nforall x (Broach(x, berchtold) -> Tariff(berchtold, haydon))\nforall x (Sepaline(x) and Broach(x, haydon) -> Tariff(x, berchtold))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, berchtold) and Broach(berchtold, vernen) -> Broach(vernen, haydon))\nforall x (Broach(x, berchtold) and Tariff(berchtold, vernen) -> Sepaline(x))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, vernen) -> Absurd(x))\nforall x (Prostitute(x, vernen) -> Tariff(x, berchtold))\nforall x (Broach(x, vernen) -> Prostitute(vernen, haydon))\n\nnot Sepaline(haydon)\n\nforall x (Broach(x, berchtold) and Tariff(berchtold, vernen) -> Sepaline(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The thomasin startle the merv. The merv stalk the thomasin. The elden startle the thomasin. If someone is judicial then they like the thomasin. If someone startle the merv then the merv stalk the elden. If someone is judicial and they eat the elden then they need the merv. If someone dirty the merv and the merv startle the thomasin then the thomasin startle the elden. If someone startle the merv and the merv stalk the thomasin then they are judicial. If someone dirty the thomasin then they are junoesque. If someone dirty the thomasin then they need the merv. If someone startle the thomasin then the thomasin dirty the elden. The elden is junoesque.", "logic": "\nStartle(thomasin, merv)\nStalk(merv, thomasin)\nStartle(elden, thomasin)\nforall x (Judicial(x) -> Dirty(x, thomasin))\nforall x (Startle(x, merv) -> Stalk(merv, elden))\nforall x (Judicial(x) and Startle(x, elden) -> Stalk(x, merv))\nforall x (Dirty(x, merv) and Startle(merv, thomasin) -> Startle(thomasin, elden))\nforall x (Startle(x, merv) and Stalk(merv, thomasin) -> Judicial(x))\nforall x (Dirty(x, thomasin) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Dirty(x, thomasin) -> Stalk(x, merv))\nforall x (Startle(x, thomasin) -> Dirty(thomasin, elden))\n\nJunoesque(elden)\n\nforall x (Dirty(x, thomasin) -> Junoesque(x)) <- forall x (Judicial(x) -> Dirty(x, thomasin)) <- forall x (Startle(x, merv) and Stalk(merv, thomasin) -> Judicial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The daveta rearm the ray. The ray transduce the daveta. The tobias rearm the daveta. If someone is infantile then they like the daveta. If someone rearm the ray then the ray transduce the tobias. If someone is infantile and they eat the tobias then they need the ray. If someone tapdance the ray and the ray rearm the daveta then the daveta rearm the tobias. If someone rearm the ray and the ray transduce the daveta then they are infantile. If someone tapdance the daveta then they are echt. If someone tapdance the daveta then they need the ray. If someone rearm the daveta then the daveta tapdance the tobias. The ray is not infantile.", "logic": "\nRearm(daveta, ray)\nTransduce(ray, daveta)\nRearm(tobias, daveta)\nforall x (Infantile(x) -> Tapdance(x, daveta))\nforall x (Rearm(x, ray) -> Transduce(ray, tobias))\nforall x (Infantile(x) and Rearm(x, tobias) -> Transduce(x, ray))\nforall x (Tapdance(x, ray) and Rearm(ray, daveta) -> Rearm(daveta, tobias))\nforall x (Rearm(x, ray) and Transduce(ray, daveta) -> Infantile(x))\nforall x (Tapdance(x, daveta) -> Echt(x))\nforall x (Tapdance(x, daveta) -> Transduce(x, ray))\nforall x (Rearm(x, daveta) -> Tapdance(daveta, tobias))\n\nnot Infantile(ray)\n\nforall x (Rearm(x, ray) and Transduce(ray, daveta) -> Infantile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The gina cube the sinclair. The sinclair debase the gina. The marc cube the gina. If someone is romaic then they like the gina. If someone cube the sinclair then the sinclair debase the marc. If someone is romaic and they eat the marc then they need the sinclair. If someone suture the sinclair and the sinclair cube the gina then the gina cube the marc. If someone cube the sinclair and the sinclair debase the gina then they are romaic. If someone suture the gina then they are heretical. If someone suture the gina then they need the sinclair. If someone cube the gina then the gina suture the marc. The sinclair debase the sinclair.", "logic": "\nCube(gina, sinclair)\nDebase(sinclair, gina)\nCube(marc, gina)\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> Suture(x, gina))\nforall x (Cube(x, sinclair) -> Debase(sinclair, marc))\nforall x (Romaic(x) and Cube(x, marc) -> Debase(x, sinclair))\nforall x (Suture(x, sinclair) and Cube(sinclair, gina) -> Cube(gina, marc))\nforall x (Cube(x, sinclair) and Debase(sinclair, gina) -> Romaic(x))\nforall x (Suture(x, gina) -> Heretical(x))\nforall x (Suture(x, gina) -> Debase(x, sinclair))\nforall x (Cube(x, gina) -> Suture(gina, marc))\n\nDebase(sinclair, sinclair)\n\nforall x (Suture(x, gina) -> Debase(x, sinclair)) <- forall x (Romaic(x) -> Suture(x, gina)) <- forall x (Cube(x, sinclair) and Debase(sinclair, gina) -> Romaic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The purcell coordinate the frederico. The frederico jilt the purcell. The pooh coordinate the purcell. If someone is gustatory then they like the purcell. If someone coordinate the frederico then the frederico jilt the pooh. If someone is gustatory and they eat the pooh then they need the frederico. If someone toddle the frederico and the frederico coordinate the purcell then the purcell coordinate the pooh. If someone coordinate the frederico and the frederico jilt the purcell then they are gustatory. If someone toddle the purcell then they are affine. If someone toddle the purcell then they need the frederico. If someone coordinate the purcell then the purcell toddle the pooh. The frederico does not eat the pooh.", "logic": "\nCoordinate(purcell, frederico)\nJilt(frederico, purcell)\nCoordinate(pooh, purcell)\nforall x (Gustatory(x) -> Toddle(x, purcell))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, frederico) -> Jilt(frederico, pooh))\nforall x (Gustatory(x) and Coordinate(x, pooh) -> Jilt(x, frederico))\nforall x (Toddle(x, frederico) and Coordinate(frederico, purcell) -> Coordinate(purcell, pooh))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, frederico) and Jilt(frederico, purcell) -> Gustatory(x))\nforall x (Toddle(x, purcell) -> Affine(x))\nforall x (Toddle(x, purcell) -> Jilt(x, frederico))\nforall x (Coordinate(x, purcell) -> Toddle(purcell, pooh))\n\nnot Coordinate(frederico, pooh)\n\nnot Coordinate(frederico, pooh) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The veronike rout the meyer. The meyer overrun the veronike. The filippa rout the veronike. If someone is gaumless then they like the veronike. If someone rout the meyer then the meyer overrun the filippa. If someone is gaumless and they eat the filippa then they need the meyer. If someone bedeck the meyer and the meyer rout the veronike then the veronike rout the filippa. If someone rout the meyer and the meyer overrun the veronike then they are gaumless. If someone bedeck the veronike then they are bombastic. If someone bedeck the veronike then they need the meyer. If someone rout the veronike then the veronike bedeck the filippa. The filippa bedeck the filippa.", "logic": "\nRout(veronike, meyer)\nOverrun(meyer, veronike)\nRout(filippa, veronike)\nforall x (Gaumless(x) -> Bedeck(x, veronike))\nforall x (Rout(x, meyer) -> Overrun(meyer, filippa))\nforall x (Gaumless(x) and Rout(x, filippa) -> Overrun(x, meyer))\nforall x (Bedeck(x, meyer) and Rout(meyer, veronike) -> Rout(veronike, filippa))\nforall x (Rout(x, meyer) and Overrun(meyer, veronike) -> Gaumless(x))\nforall x (Bedeck(x, veronike) -> Bombastic(x))\nforall x (Bedeck(x, veronike) -> Overrun(x, meyer))\nforall x (Rout(x, veronike) -> Bedeck(veronike, filippa))\n\nBedeck(filippa, filippa)\n\nBedeck(filippa, filippa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The brittan doom the xena. The xena roost the brittan. The arabelle doom the brittan. If someone is hindu then they like the brittan. If someone doom the xena then the xena roost the arabelle. If someone is hindu and they eat the arabelle then they need the xena. If someone shrink the xena and the xena doom the brittan then the brittan doom the arabelle. If someone doom the xena and the xena roost the brittan then they are hindu. If someone shrink the brittan then they are loth. If someone shrink the brittan then they need the xena. If someone doom the brittan then the brittan shrink the arabelle. The xena does not like the xena.", "logic": "\nDoom(brittan, xena)\nRoost(xena, brittan)\nDoom(arabelle, brittan)\nforall x (Hindu(x) -> Shrink(x, brittan))\nforall x (Doom(x, xena) -> Roost(xena, arabelle))\nforall x (Hindu(x) and Doom(x, arabelle) -> Roost(x, xena))\nforall x (Shrink(x, xena) and Doom(xena, brittan) -> Doom(brittan, arabelle))\nforall x (Doom(x, xena) and Roost(xena, brittan) -> Hindu(x))\nforall x (Shrink(x, brittan) -> Loth(x))\nforall x (Shrink(x, brittan) -> Roost(x, xena))\nforall x (Doom(x, brittan) -> Shrink(brittan, arabelle))\n\nnot Shrink(xena, xena)\n\nnot Shrink(xena, xena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "The ellie eventuate the byram. The byram twirl the ellie. The bettine eventuate the ellie. If someone is other then they like the ellie. If someone eventuate the byram then the byram twirl the bettine. If someone is other and they eat the bettine then they need the byram. If someone anoint the byram and the byram eventuate the ellie then the ellie eventuate the bettine. If someone eventuate the byram and the byram twirl the ellie then they are other. If someone anoint the ellie then they are lambent. If someone anoint the ellie then they need the byram. If someone eventuate the ellie then the ellie anoint the bettine. The ellie is blue.", "logic": "\nEventuate(ellie, byram)\nTwirl(byram, ellie)\nEventuate(bettine, ellie)\nforall x (Other(x) -> Anoint(x, ellie))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, byram) -> Twirl(byram, bettine))\nforall x (Other(x) and Eventuate(x, bettine) -> Twirl(x, byram))\nforall x (Anoint(x, byram) and Eventuate(byram, ellie) -> Eventuate(ellie, bettine))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, byram) and Twirl(byram, ellie) -> Other(x))\nforall x (Anoint(x, ellie) -> Lambent(x))\nforall x (Anoint(x, ellie) -> Twirl(x, byram))\nforall x (Eventuate(x, ellie) -> Anoint(ellie, bettine))\n\nBlue(ellie)\n\nBlue(ellie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-272"} {"premises": "Claresta is petrifying. Claresta is tiny. Claresta is beakless. Nice, peaceful people are petrifying. If Claresta is tiny then Claresta is petrifying. Quiet people are amateur. If someone is peaceful then they are inveterate. All beakless people are inveterate. If someone is inveterate then they are peaceful. All tiny people are encumbered. If someone is inveterate and tiny then they are encumbered. Claresta is beakless.", "logic": "\nPetrifying(claresta)\nTiny(claresta)\nBeakless(claresta)\nforall x (Inveterate(x) and Peaceful(x) -> Petrifying(x))\nTiny(claresta) -> Petrifying(claresta)\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Amateur(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Inveterate(x))\nforall x (Beakless(x) -> Inveterate(x))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Tiny(x) -> Encumbered(x))\nforall x (Inveterate(x) and Tiny(x) -> Encumbered(x))\n\nBeakless(claresta)\n\ntherefore Beakless(claresta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Gracie is yearly. Gracie is credible. Gracie is permeative. Nice, unicameral people are yearly. If Gracie is credible then Gracie is yearly. Quiet people are fetal. If someone is unicameral then they are sacculate. All permeative people are sacculate. If someone is sacculate then they are unicameral. All credible people are isoclinic. If someone is sacculate and credible then they are isoclinic. Gracie is not credible.", "logic": "\nYearly(gracie)\nCredible(gracie)\nPermeative(gracie)\nforall x (Sacculate(x) and Unicameral(x) -> Yearly(x))\nCredible(gracie) -> Yearly(gracie)\nforall x (Unicameral(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Unicameral(x) -> Sacculate(x))\nforall x (Permeative(x) -> Sacculate(x))\nforall x (Sacculate(x) -> Unicameral(x))\nforall x (Credible(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\nforall x (Sacculate(x) and Credible(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\n\nnot Credible(gracie)\n\ntherefore Credible(gracie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Woochang is swordlike. Woochang is unsecured. Woochang is iridescent. Nice, anachronic people are swordlike. If Woochang is unsecured then Woochang is swordlike. Quiet people are platonic. If someone is anachronic then they are sentient. All iridescent people are sentient. If someone is sentient then they are anachronic. All unsecured people are lordotic. If someone is sentient and unsecured then they are lordotic. Woochang is lordotic.", "logic": "\nSwordlike(woochang)\nUnsecured(woochang)\nIridescent(woochang)\nforall x (Sentient(x) and Anachronic(x) -> Swordlike(x))\nUnsecured(woochang) -> Swordlike(woochang)\nforall x (Anachronic(x) -> Platonic(x))\nforall x (Anachronic(x) -> Sentient(x))\nforall x (Iridescent(x) -> Sentient(x))\nforall x (Sentient(x) -> Anachronic(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) -> Lordotic(x))\nforall x (Sentient(x) and Unsecured(x) -> Lordotic(x))\n\nLordotic(woochang)\n\nUnsecured(woochang) and forall x (Unsecured(x) -> Lordotic(x)) -> therefore Lordotic(woochang)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Yehudit is avascular. Yehudit is unworldly. Yehudit is hooked. Nice, trinuclear people are avascular. If Yehudit is unworldly then Yehudit is avascular. Quiet people are tartarean. If someone is trinuclear then they are sickening. All hooked people are sickening. If someone is sickening then they are trinuclear. All unworldly people are chewable. If someone is sickening and unworldly then they are chewable. Yehudit is not chewable.", "logic": "\nAvascular(yehudit)\nUnworldly(yehudit)\nHooked(yehudit)\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Trinuclear(x) -> Avascular(x))\nUnworldly(yehudit) -> Avascular(yehudit)\nforall x (Trinuclear(x) -> Tartarean(x))\nforall x (Trinuclear(x) -> Sickening(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) -> Sickening(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) -> Trinuclear(x))\nforall x (Unworldly(x) -> Chewable(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Unworldly(x) -> Chewable(x))\n\nnot Chewable(yehudit)\n\nUnworldly(yehudit) and forall x (Unworldly(x) -> Chewable(x)) -> therefore Chewable(yehudit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Agustin is unshaved. Agustin is walleyed. Agustin is unsugared. Nice, thorough people are unshaved. If Agustin is walleyed then Agustin is unshaved. Quiet people are floccose. If someone is thorough then they are rhodesian. All unsugared people are rhodesian. If someone is rhodesian then they are thorough. All walleyed people are imprudent. If someone is rhodesian and walleyed then they are imprudent. Agustin is thorough.", "logic": "\nUnshaved(agustin)\nWalleyed(agustin)\nUnsugared(agustin)\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) and Thorough(x) -> Unshaved(x))\nWalleyed(agustin) -> Unshaved(agustin)\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Floccose(x))\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\nforall x (Unsugared(x) -> Rhodesian(x))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) -> Thorough(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) -> Imprudent(x))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) and Walleyed(x) -> Imprudent(x))\n\nThorough(agustin)\n\nUnsugared(agustin) and forall x (Unsugared(x) -> Rhodesian(x)) -> therefore Rhodesian(agustin) Rhodesian(agustin) and forall x (Rhodesian(x) -> Thorough(x)) -> therefore Thorough(agustin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Neala is afeard. Neala is shallow. Neala is still. Nice, referent people are afeard. If Neala is shallow then Neala is afeard. Quiet people are unamended. If someone is referent then they are binucleate. All still people are binucleate. If someone is binucleate then they are referent. All shallow people are mixable. If someone is binucleate and shallow then they are mixable. Neala is not referent.", "logic": "\nAfeard(neala)\nShallow(neala)\nStill(neala)\nforall x (Binucleate(x) and Referent(x) -> Afeard(x))\nShallow(neala) -> Afeard(neala)\nforall x (Referent(x) -> Unamended(x))\nforall x (Referent(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Still(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) -> Referent(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) -> Mixable(x))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) and Shallow(x) -> Mixable(x))\n\nnot Referent(neala)\n\nStill(neala) and forall x (Still(x) -> Binucleate(x)) -> therefore Binucleate(neala) Binucleate(neala) and forall x (Binucleate(x) -> Referent(x)) -> therefore Referent(neala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Tina is quaternary. Tina is obliged. Tina is unshaped. Nice, stupefying people are quaternary. If Tina is obliged then Tina is quaternary. Quiet people are rash. If someone is stupefying then they are extendible. All unshaped people are extendible. If someone is extendible then they are stupefying. All obliged people are hatless. If someone is extendible and obliged then they are hatless. Tina is rash.", "logic": "\nQuaternary(tina)\nObliged(tina)\nUnshaped(tina)\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Stupefying(x) -> Quaternary(x))\nObliged(tina) -> Quaternary(tina)\nforall x (Stupefying(x) -> Rash(x))\nforall x (Stupefying(x) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Unshaped(x) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) -> Stupefying(x))\nforall x (Obliged(x) -> Hatless(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Obliged(x) -> Hatless(x))\n\nRash(tina)\n\nUnshaped(tina) and forall x (Unshaped(x) -> Extendible(x)) -> therefore Extendible(tina) Extendible(tina) and forall x (Extendible(x) -> Stupefying(x)) -> therefore Stupefying(tina) Stupefying(tina) and forall x (Stupefying(x) -> Rash(x)) -> therefore Rash(tina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Joelynn is leaky. Joelynn is aboriginal. Joelynn is serrate. Nice, allocable people are leaky. If Joelynn is aboriginal then Joelynn is leaky. Quiet people are political. If someone is allocable then they are anxious. All serrate people are anxious. If someone is anxious then they are allocable. All aboriginal people are acrogenic. If someone is anxious and aboriginal then they are acrogenic. Joelynn is not political.", "logic": "\nLeaky(joelynn)\nAboriginal(joelynn)\nSerrate(joelynn)\nforall x (Anxious(x) and Allocable(x) -> Leaky(x))\nAboriginal(joelynn) -> Leaky(joelynn)\nforall x (Allocable(x) -> Political(x))\nforall x (Allocable(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Serrate(x) -> Anxious(x))\nforall x (Anxious(x) -> Allocable(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) -> Acrogenic(x))\nforall x (Anxious(x) and Aboriginal(x) -> Acrogenic(x))\n\nnot Political(joelynn)\n\nSerrate(joelynn) and forall x (Serrate(x) -> Anxious(x)) -> therefore Anxious(joelynn) Anxious(joelynn) and forall x (Anxious(x) -> Allocable(x)) -> therefore Allocable(joelynn) Allocable(joelynn) and forall x (Allocable(x) -> Political(x)) -> therefore Political(joelynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1032"} {"premises": "Reena is afoot. Reena is swollen. Carlynne is afoot. Carlynne is not swollen. Carlynne is advertent. Carlynne is mechanical. Vachel is swollen. Vachel is mechanical. Vachel is sear. Kerrie is excursive. Kerrie is afoot. Kerrie is advertent. Furry things are sear. All swollen things are sear. All advertent things are lowest. All advertent things are lowest. All excursive things are lowest. All sear things are excursive. Carlynne is not swollen.", "logic": "\nAfoot(reena)\nSwollen(reena)\nAfoot(carlynne)\nnot Swollen(carlynne)\nAdvertent(carlynne)\nMechanical(carlynne)\nSwollen(vachel)\nMechanical(vachel)\nSear(vachel)\nExcursive(kerrie)\nAfoot(kerrie)\nAdvertent(kerrie)\nforall x (Swollen(x) -> Sear(x))\nforall x (Swollen(x) -> Sear(x))\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Advertent(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Excursive(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Sear(x) -> Excursive(x))\n\nnot Swollen(carlynne)\n\ntherefore not Swollen(carlynne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Suellen is retinal. Suellen is cleanly. Jessi is retinal. Jessi is not cleanly. Jessi is flighted. Jessi is overmuch. Dirk is cleanly. Dirk is overmuch. Dirk is spotty. Jory is masterless. Jory is retinal. Jory is flighted. Furry things are spotty. All cleanly things are spotty. All flighted things are surmisable. All flighted things are surmisable. All masterless things are surmisable. All spotty things are masterless. Jessi is not flighted.", "logic": "\nRetinal(suellen)\nCleanly(suellen)\nRetinal(jessi)\nnot Cleanly(jessi)\nFlighted(jessi)\nOvermuch(jessi)\nCleanly(dirk)\nOvermuch(dirk)\nSpotty(dirk)\nMasterless(jory)\nRetinal(jory)\nFlighted(jory)\nforall x (Cleanly(x) -> Spotty(x))\nforall x (Cleanly(x) -> Spotty(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Flighted(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) -> Surmisable(x))\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Masterless(x))\n\nnot Flighted(jessi)\n\ntherefore Flighted(jessi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Heidie is germinal. Heidie is aroused. Gabie is germinal. Gabie is not aroused. Gabie is homophobic. Gabie is adequate. Merilyn is aroused. Merilyn is adequate. Merilyn is poorly. Corliss is corned. Corliss is germinal. Corliss is homophobic. Furry things are poorly. All aroused things are poorly. All homophobic things are diseased. All homophobic things are diseased. All corned things are diseased. All poorly things are corned. Gabie is diseased.", "logic": "\nGerminal(heidie)\nAroused(heidie)\nGerminal(gabie)\nnot Aroused(gabie)\nHomophobic(gabie)\nAdequate(gabie)\nAroused(merilyn)\nAdequate(merilyn)\nPoorly(merilyn)\nCorned(corliss)\nGerminal(corliss)\nHomophobic(corliss)\nforall x (Aroused(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Aroused(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Diseased(x))\nforall x (Homophobic(x) -> Diseased(x))\nforall x (Corned(x) -> Diseased(x))\nforall x (Poorly(x) -> Corned(x))\n\nDiseased(gabie)\n\nHomophobic(gabie) and forall x (Homophobic(x) -> Diseased(x)) -> therefore Diseased(gabie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Umeko is sculpted. Umeko is rancorous. Elyn is sculpted. Elyn is not rancorous. Elyn is airborne. Elyn is moresque. Dinnie is rancorous. Dinnie is moresque. Dinnie is drastic. Miran is gruff. Miran is sculpted. Miran is airborne. Furry things are drastic. All rancorous things are drastic. All airborne things are leakproof. All airborne things are leakproof. All gruff things are leakproof. All drastic things are gruff. Umeko is not drastic.", "logic": "\nSculpted(umeko)\nRancorous(umeko)\nSculpted(elyn)\nnot Rancorous(elyn)\nAirborne(elyn)\nMoresque(elyn)\nRancorous(dinnie)\nMoresque(dinnie)\nDrastic(dinnie)\nGruff(miran)\nSculpted(miran)\nAirborne(miran)\nforall x (Rancorous(x) -> Drastic(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) -> Drastic(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> Leakproof(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> Leakproof(x))\nforall x (Gruff(x) -> Leakproof(x))\nforall x (Drastic(x) -> Gruff(x))\n\nnot Drastic(umeko)\n\nRancorous(umeko) and forall x (Rancorous(x) -> Drastic(x)) -> therefore Drastic(umeko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Sheridan is haemic. Sheridan is despondent. Ronda is haemic. Ronda is not despondent. Ronda is dandy. Ronda is penumbral. Sofie is despondent. Sofie is penumbral. Sofie is wearying. Maude is marbleised. Maude is haemic. Maude is dandy. Furry things are wearying. All despondent things are wearying. All dandy things are bivalve. All dandy things are bivalve. All marbleised things are bivalve. All wearying things are marbleised. Sheridan is marbleised.", "logic": "\nHaemic(sheridan)\nDespondent(sheridan)\nHaemic(ronda)\nnot Despondent(ronda)\nDandy(ronda)\nPenumbral(ronda)\nDespondent(sofie)\nPenumbral(sofie)\nWearying(sofie)\nMarbleised(maude)\nHaemic(maude)\nDandy(maude)\nforall x (Despondent(x) -> Wearying(x))\nforall x (Despondent(x) -> Wearying(x))\nforall x (Dandy(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Dandy(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Marbleised(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Marbleised(x))\n\nMarbleised(sheridan)\n\nDespondent(sheridan) and forall x (Despondent(x) -> Wearying(x)) -> therefore Wearying(sheridan) Wearying(sheridan) and forall x (Wearying(x) -> Marbleised(x)) -> therefore Marbleised(sheridan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Thibaud is memberless. Thibaud is emblematic. Jameson is memberless. Jameson is not emblematic. Jameson is myelic. Jameson is donnean. Shaylynn is emblematic. Shaylynn is donnean. Shaylynn is mechanical. Ramsey is ossified. Ramsey is memberless. Ramsey is myelic. Furry things are mechanical. All emblematic things are mechanical. All myelic things are steady. All myelic things are steady. All ossified things are steady. All mechanical things are ossified. Thibaud is not ossified.", "logic": "\nMemberless(thibaud)\nEmblematic(thibaud)\nMemberless(jameson)\nnot Emblematic(jameson)\nMyelic(jameson)\nDonnean(jameson)\nEmblematic(shaylynn)\nDonnean(shaylynn)\nMechanical(shaylynn)\nOssified(ramsey)\nMemberless(ramsey)\nMyelic(ramsey)\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Mechanical(x))\nforall x (Emblematic(x) -> Mechanical(x))\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Steady(x))\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> Steady(x))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Steady(x))\nforall x (Mechanical(x) -> Ossified(x))\n\nnot Ossified(thibaud)\n\nEmblematic(thibaud) and forall x (Emblematic(x) -> Mechanical(x)) -> therefore Mechanical(thibaud) Mechanical(thibaud) and forall x (Mechanical(x) -> Ossified(x)) -> therefore Ossified(thibaud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Chase is unweary. Chase is tinkling. Karolina is unweary. Karolina is not tinkling. Karolina is contented. Karolina is amebous. Levy is tinkling. Levy is amebous. Levy is madagascan. Nels is mental. Nels is unweary. Nels is contented. Furry things are madagascan. All tinkling things are madagascan. All contented things are ebon. All contented things are ebon. All mental things are ebon. All madagascan things are mental. Chase is ebon.", "logic": "\nUnweary(chase)\nTinkling(chase)\nUnweary(karolina)\nnot Tinkling(karolina)\nContented(karolina)\nAmebous(karolina)\nTinkling(levy)\nAmebous(levy)\nMadagascan(levy)\nMental(nels)\nUnweary(nels)\nContented(nels)\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Madagascan(x))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Madagascan(x))\nforall x (Contented(x) -> Ebon(x))\nforall x (Contented(x) -> Ebon(x))\nforall x (Mental(x) -> Ebon(x))\nforall x (Madagascan(x) -> Mental(x))\n\nEbon(chase)\n\nTinkling(chase) and forall x (Tinkling(x) -> Madagascan(x)) -> therefore Madagascan(chase) Madagascan(chase) and forall x (Madagascan(x) -> Mental(x)) -> therefore Mental(chase) Mental(chase) and forall x (Mental(x) -> Ebon(x)) -> therefore Ebon(chase)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Saba is retinal. Saba is unenforced. Coralie is retinal. Coralie is not unenforced. Coralie is undefiled. Coralie is primaeval. Lazar is unenforced. Lazar is primaeval. Lazar is diazo. Tabbie is swooning. Tabbie is retinal. Tabbie is undefiled. Furry things are diazo. All unenforced things are diazo. All undefiled things are unpaired. All undefiled things are unpaired. All swooning things are unpaired. All diazo things are swooning. Saba is not unpaired.", "logic": "\nRetinal(saba)\nUnenforced(saba)\nRetinal(coralie)\nnot Unenforced(coralie)\nUndefiled(coralie)\nPrimaeval(coralie)\nUnenforced(lazar)\nPrimaeval(lazar)\nDiazo(lazar)\nSwooning(tabbie)\nRetinal(tabbie)\nUndefiled(tabbie)\nforall x (Unenforced(x) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Unenforced(x) -> Diazo(x))\nforall x (Undefiled(x) -> Unpaired(x))\nforall x (Undefiled(x) -> Unpaired(x))\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> Unpaired(x))\nforall x (Diazo(x) -> Swooning(x))\n\nnot Unpaired(saba)\n\nUnenforced(saba) and forall x (Unenforced(x) -> Diazo(x)) -> therefore Diazo(saba) Diazo(saba) and forall x (Diazo(x) -> Swooning(x)) -> therefore Swooning(saba) Swooning(saba) and forall x (Swooning(x) -> Unpaired(x)) -> therefore Unpaired(saba)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Darcie is xciv. Darcie is bullocky. Floyd is xciv. Floyd is not bullocky. Floyd is unsocial. Floyd is dissident. Sergio is bullocky. Sergio is dissident. Sergio is bally. Dwane is surly. Dwane is xciv. Dwane is unsocial. Furry things are bally. All bullocky things are bally. All unsocial things are outlying. All unsocial things are outlying. All surly things are outlying. All bally things are surly. Dwane is not bally.", "logic": "\nXciv(darcie)\nBullocky(darcie)\nXciv(floyd)\nnot Bullocky(floyd)\nUnsocial(floyd)\nDissident(floyd)\nBullocky(sergio)\nDissident(sergio)\nBally(sergio)\nSurly(dwane)\nXciv(dwane)\nUnsocial(dwane)\nforall x (Bullocky(x) -> Bally(x))\nforall x (Bullocky(x) -> Bally(x))\nforall x (Unsocial(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Unsocial(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Surly(x) -> Outlying(x))\nforall x (Bally(x) -> Surly(x))\n\nnot Bally(dwane)\n\nforall x (Bullocky(x) -> Bally(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Evonne is scoured. Evonne is mythic. Eolanda is scoured. Eolanda is not mythic. Eolanda is transposed. Eolanda is decimal. Winona is mythic. Winona is decimal. Winona is hospitable. Bruce is outer. Bruce is scoured. Bruce is transposed. Furry things are hospitable. All mythic things are hospitable. All transposed things are tapering. All transposed things are tapering. All outer things are tapering. All hospitable things are outer. Eolanda is hospitable.", "logic": "\nScoured(evonne)\nMythic(evonne)\nScoured(eolanda)\nnot Mythic(eolanda)\nTransposed(eolanda)\nDecimal(eolanda)\nMythic(winona)\nDecimal(winona)\nHospitable(winona)\nOuter(bruce)\nScoured(bruce)\nTransposed(bruce)\nforall x (Mythic(x) -> Hospitable(x))\nforall x (Mythic(x) -> Hospitable(x))\nforall x (Transposed(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Transposed(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Outer(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Hospitable(x) -> Outer(x))\n\nHospitable(eolanda)\n\nforall x (Mythic(x) -> Hospitable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Emogene is squalling. Emogene is regulatory. Nathanael is squalling. Nathanael is not regulatory. Nathanael is homy. Nathanael is planned. Ilyssa is regulatory. Ilyssa is planned. Ilyssa is sapiens. Amie is basilary. Amie is squalling. Amie is homy. Furry things are sapiens. All regulatory things are sapiens. All homy things are slovakian. All homy things are slovakian. All basilary things are slovakian. All sapiens things are basilary. Nathanael is not basilary.", "logic": "\nSqualling(emogene)\nRegulatory(emogene)\nSqualling(nathanael)\nnot Regulatory(nathanael)\nHomy(nathanael)\nPlanned(nathanael)\nRegulatory(ilyssa)\nPlanned(ilyssa)\nSapiens(ilyssa)\nBasilary(amie)\nSqualling(amie)\nHomy(amie)\nforall x (Regulatory(x) -> Sapiens(x))\nforall x (Regulatory(x) -> Sapiens(x))\nforall x (Homy(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Homy(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Basilary(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Sapiens(x) -> Basilary(x))\n\nnot Basilary(nathanael)\n\nforall x (Sapiens(x) -> Basilary(x)) <- forall x (Regulatory(x) -> Sapiens(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Berkley is solemn. Berkley is appointive. Reggi is solemn. Reggi is not appointive. Reggi is constant. Reggi is crabbed. Rab is appointive. Rab is crabbed. Rab is wholemeal. Eberhard is legless. Eberhard is solemn. Eberhard is constant. Furry things are wholemeal. All appointive things are wholemeal. All constant things are ended. All constant things are ended. All legless things are ended. All wholemeal things are legless. Berkley is crabbed.", "logic": "\nSolemn(berkley)\nAppointive(berkley)\nSolemn(reggi)\nnot Appointive(reggi)\nConstant(reggi)\nCrabbed(reggi)\nAppointive(rab)\nCrabbed(rab)\nWholemeal(rab)\nLegless(eberhard)\nSolemn(eberhard)\nConstant(eberhard)\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Appointive(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) -> Ended(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) -> Ended(x))\nforall x (Legless(x) -> Ended(x))\nforall x (Wholemeal(x) -> Legless(x))\n\nCrabbed(berkley)\n\nCrabbed(berkley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Pet is disputable. Pet is bovine. Ekaterina is disputable. Ekaterina is not bovine. Ekaterina is preceding. Ekaterina is impelling. Elora is bovine. Elora is impelling. Elora is rubicund. Lucinda is winded. Lucinda is disputable. Lucinda is preceding. Furry things are rubicund. All bovine things are rubicund. All preceding things are awnless. All preceding things are awnless. All winded things are awnless. All rubicund things are winded. Elora is not preceding.", "logic": "\nDisputable(pet)\nBovine(pet)\nDisputable(ekaterina)\nnot Bovine(ekaterina)\nPreceding(ekaterina)\nImpelling(ekaterina)\nBovine(elora)\nImpelling(elora)\nRubicund(elora)\nWinded(lucinda)\nDisputable(lucinda)\nPreceding(lucinda)\nforall x (Bovine(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Bovine(x) -> Rubicund(x))\nforall x (Preceding(x) -> Awnless(x))\nforall x (Preceding(x) -> Awnless(x))\nforall x (Winded(x) -> Awnless(x))\nforall x (Rubicund(x) -> Winded(x))\n\nnot Preceding(elora)\n\nnot Preceding(elora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Victor is unreliable. Victor is placating. Dawson is unreliable. Dawson is not placating. Dawson is urogenital. Dawson is unobserved. Eimile is placating. Eimile is unobserved. Eimile is livid. Dian is plutonic. Dian is unreliable. Dian is urogenital. Furry things are livid. All placating things are livid. All urogenital things are uptight. All urogenital things are uptight. All plutonic things are uptight. All livid things are plutonic. Eimile is unreliable.", "logic": "\nUnreliable(victor)\nPlacating(victor)\nUnreliable(dawson)\nnot Placating(dawson)\nUrogenital(dawson)\nUnobserved(dawson)\nPlacating(eimile)\nUnobserved(eimile)\nLivid(eimile)\nPlutonic(dian)\nUnreliable(dian)\nUrogenital(dian)\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Livid(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Livid(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Livid(x) -> Plutonic(x))\n\nUnreliable(eimile)\n\nUnreliable(eimile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Edee is amerindic. Edee is touchy. Phillip is amerindic. Phillip is not touchy. Phillip is bisexual. Phillip is sanitary. Sabrina is touchy. Sabrina is sanitary. Sabrina is vaned. Janela is abscessed. Janela is amerindic. Janela is bisexual. Furry things are vaned. All touchy things are vaned. All bisexual things are practical. All bisexual things are practical. All abscessed things are practical. All vaned things are abscessed. Janela is not sanitary.", "logic": "\nAmerindic(edee)\nTouchy(edee)\nAmerindic(phillip)\nnot Touchy(phillip)\nBisexual(phillip)\nSanitary(phillip)\nTouchy(sabrina)\nSanitary(sabrina)\nVaned(sabrina)\nAbscessed(janela)\nAmerindic(janela)\nBisexual(janela)\nforall x (Touchy(x) -> Vaned(x))\nforall x (Touchy(x) -> Vaned(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) -> Practical(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) -> Practical(x))\nforall x (Abscessed(x) -> Practical(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) -> Abscessed(x))\n\nnot Sanitary(janela)\n\nnot Sanitary(janela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Timotheus is captious. Timotheus is woolly. Mira is captious. Mira is not woolly. Mira is squally. Mira is tantric. Carmella is woolly. Carmella is tantric. Carmella is chinese. Buster is agrologic. Buster is captious. Buster is squally. Furry things are chinese. All woolly things are chinese. All squally things are deltoid. All squally things are deltoid. All agrologic things are deltoid. All chinese things are agrologic. Buster is woolly.", "logic": "\nCaptious(timotheus)\nWoolly(timotheus)\nCaptious(mira)\nnot Woolly(mira)\nSqually(mira)\nTantric(mira)\nWoolly(carmella)\nTantric(carmella)\nChinese(carmella)\nAgrologic(buster)\nCaptious(buster)\nSqually(buster)\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Chinese(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Chinese(x))\nforall x (Squally(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Squally(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Agrologic(x) -> Deltoid(x))\nforall x (Chinese(x) -> Agrologic(x))\n\nWoolly(buster)\n\nWoolly(buster) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-552"} {"premises": "Lynnelle is iraki. Harvey is octangular. Harvey is cycloid. Blisse is not recognized. Blisse is cycloid. Layton is corporate. Layton is not cycloid. If Harvey is iraki then Harvey is recognized. If Harvey is recognized then Harvey is iodised. If Harvey is octangular then Harvey is iraki. Harvey is cycloid.", "logic": "\nIraki(lynnelle)\nOctangular(harvey)\nCycloid(harvey)\nnot Recognized(blisse)\nCycloid(blisse)\nCorporate(layton)\nnot Cycloid(layton)\nIraki(harvey) -> Recognized(harvey)\nRecognized(harvey) -> Iodised(harvey)\nOctangular(harvey) -> Iraki(harvey)\n\nCycloid(harvey)\n\ntherefore Cycloid(harvey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Wolfy is little. Cati is lxvii. Cati is mayoral. Hunter is not polyoicous. Hunter is mayoral. Mitch is sportive. Mitch is not mayoral. If Cati is little then Cati is polyoicous. If Cati is polyoicous then Cati is slavish. If Cati is lxvii then Cati is little. Hunter is not mayoral.", "logic": "\nLittle(wolfy)\nLxvii(cati)\nMayoral(cati)\nnot Polyoicous(hunter)\nMayoral(hunter)\nSportive(mitch)\nnot Mayoral(mitch)\nLittle(cati) -> Polyoicous(cati)\nPolyoicous(cati) -> Slavish(cati)\nLxvii(cati) -> Little(cati)\n\nnot Mayoral(hunter)\n\ntherefore Mayoral(hunter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Kelcy is carven. Farand is squelched. Farand is stumpy. Geralda is not spruce. Geralda is stumpy. Lyndon is canicular. Lyndon is not stumpy. If Farand is carven then Farand is spruce. If Farand is spruce then Farand is amyloid. If Farand is squelched then Farand is carven. Farand is carven.", "logic": "\nCarven(kelcy)\nSquelched(farand)\nStumpy(farand)\nnot Spruce(geralda)\nStumpy(geralda)\nCanicular(lyndon)\nnot Stumpy(lyndon)\nCarven(farand) -> Spruce(farand)\nSpruce(farand) -> Amyloid(farand)\nSquelched(farand) -> Carven(farand)\n\nCarven(farand)\n\nSquelched(farand) and Squelched(farand) -> Carven(farand) -> therefore Carven(farand)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Lynnette is overeager. Misti is schmaltzy. Misti is taciturn. Immanuel is not cochlear. Immanuel is taciturn. Alina is unsuited. Alina is not taciturn. If Misti is overeager then Misti is cochlear. If Misti is cochlear then Misti is lapidary. If Misti is schmaltzy then Misti is overeager. Misti is not overeager.", "logic": "\nOvereager(lynnette)\nSchmaltzy(misti)\nTaciturn(misti)\nnot Cochlear(immanuel)\nTaciturn(immanuel)\nUnsuited(alina)\nnot Taciturn(alina)\nOvereager(misti) -> Cochlear(misti)\nCochlear(misti) -> Lapidary(misti)\nSchmaltzy(misti) -> Overeager(misti)\n\nnot Overeager(misti)\n\nSchmaltzy(misti) and Schmaltzy(misti) -> Overeager(misti) -> therefore Overeager(misti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Adger is bandy. Alyse is sheathed. Alyse is expired. Philly is not clarion. Philly is expired. Rosamund is thawed. Rosamund is not expired. If Alyse is bandy then Alyse is clarion. If Alyse is clarion then Alyse is bicapsular. If Alyse is sheathed then Alyse is bandy. Alyse is clarion.", "logic": "\nBandy(adger)\nSheathed(alyse)\nExpired(alyse)\nnot Clarion(philly)\nExpired(philly)\nThawed(rosamund)\nnot Expired(rosamund)\nBandy(alyse) -> Clarion(alyse)\nClarion(alyse) -> Bicapsular(alyse)\nSheathed(alyse) -> Bandy(alyse)\n\nClarion(alyse)\n\nSheathed(alyse) and Sheathed(alyse) -> Bandy(alyse) -> therefore Bandy(alyse) Bandy(alyse) and Bandy(alyse) -> Clarion(alyse) -> therefore Clarion(alyse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Charlot is appetent. Uri is vasomotor. Uri is terrifying. Kesley is not ceric. Kesley is terrifying. Lindsay is scrimy. Lindsay is not terrifying. If Uri is appetent then Uri is ceric. If Uri is ceric then Uri is footling. If Uri is vasomotor then Uri is appetent. Uri is not ceric.", "logic": "\nAppetent(charlot)\nVasomotor(uri)\nTerrifying(uri)\nnot Ceric(kesley)\nTerrifying(kesley)\nScrimy(lindsay)\nnot Terrifying(lindsay)\nAppetent(uri) -> Ceric(uri)\nCeric(uri) -> Footling(uri)\nVasomotor(uri) -> Appetent(uri)\n\nnot Ceric(uri)\n\nVasomotor(uri) and Vasomotor(uri) -> Appetent(uri) -> therefore Appetent(uri) Appetent(uri) and Appetent(uri) -> Ceric(uri) -> therefore Ceric(uri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Antonia is danceable. Caesar is societal. Caesar is unfocussed. Holli is not redeeming. Holli is unfocussed. Alexander is epiphysial. Alexander is not unfocussed. If Caesar is danceable then Caesar is redeeming. If Caesar is redeeming then Caesar is textual. If Caesar is societal then Caesar is danceable. Caesar is textual.", "logic": "\nDanceable(antonia)\nSocietal(caesar)\nUnfocussed(caesar)\nnot Redeeming(holli)\nUnfocussed(holli)\nEpiphysial(alexander)\nnot Unfocussed(alexander)\nDanceable(caesar) -> Redeeming(caesar)\nRedeeming(caesar) -> Textual(caesar)\nSocietal(caesar) -> Danceable(caesar)\n\nTextual(caesar)\n\nSocietal(caesar) and Societal(caesar) -> Danceable(caesar) -> therefore Danceable(caesar) Danceable(caesar) and Danceable(caesar) -> Redeeming(caesar) -> therefore Redeeming(caesar) Redeeming(caesar) and Redeeming(caesar) -> Textual(caesar) -> therefore Textual(caesar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Eulalie is pertinent. Taite is authorised. Taite is furred. Dione is not prismatic. Dione is furred. Giovanna is gymnastic. Giovanna is not furred. If Taite is pertinent then Taite is prismatic. If Taite is prismatic then Taite is totalistic. If Taite is authorised then Taite is pertinent. Taite is not totalistic.", "logic": "\nPertinent(eulalie)\nAuthorised(taite)\nFurred(taite)\nnot Prismatic(dione)\nFurred(dione)\nGymnastic(giovanna)\nnot Furred(giovanna)\nPertinent(taite) -> Prismatic(taite)\nPrismatic(taite) -> Totalistic(taite)\nAuthorised(taite) -> Pertinent(taite)\n\nnot Totalistic(taite)\n\nAuthorised(taite) and Authorised(taite) -> Pertinent(taite) -> therefore Pertinent(taite) Pertinent(taite) and Pertinent(taite) -> Prismatic(taite) -> therefore Prismatic(taite) Prismatic(taite) and Prismatic(taite) -> Totalistic(taite) -> therefore Totalistic(taite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Davide is bedfast. Berni is hourlong. Berni is corking. Ezekiel is not raftered. Ezekiel is corking. Esme is baptismal. Esme is not corking. If Berni is bedfast then Berni is raftered. If Berni is raftered then Berni is antrorse. If Berni is hourlong then Berni is bedfast. Ezekiel is not baptismal.", "logic": "\nBedfast(davide)\nHourlong(berni)\nCorking(berni)\nnot Raftered(ezekiel)\nCorking(ezekiel)\nBaptismal(esme)\nnot Corking(esme)\nBedfast(berni) -> Raftered(berni)\nRaftered(berni) -> Antrorse(berni)\nHourlong(berni) -> Bedfast(berni)\n\nnot Baptismal(ezekiel)\n\nnot Baptismal(ezekiel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Elle is prefab. Alissa is forehand. Alissa is italic. Coletta is not downward. Coletta is italic. Davis is vegetative. Davis is not italic. If Alissa is prefab then Alissa is downward. If Alissa is downward then Alissa is jerky. If Alissa is forehand then Alissa is prefab. Davis is young.", "logic": "\nPrefab(elle)\nForehand(alissa)\nItalic(alissa)\nnot Downward(coletta)\nItalic(coletta)\nVegetative(davis)\nnot Italic(davis)\nPrefab(alissa) -> Downward(alissa)\nDownward(alissa) -> Jerky(alissa)\nForehand(alissa) -> Prefab(alissa)\n\nYoung(davis)\n\nYoung(davis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Annalee is wideband. Perrine is tinkling. Perrine is surd. Benetta is not vietnamese. Benetta is surd. Alyse is matching. Alyse is not surd. If Perrine is wideband then Perrine is vietnamese. If Perrine is vietnamese then Perrine is evidential. If Perrine is tinkling then Perrine is wideband. Benetta is not tinkling.", "logic": "\nWideband(annalee)\nTinkling(perrine)\nSurd(perrine)\nnot Vietnamese(benetta)\nSurd(benetta)\nMatching(alyse)\nnot Surd(alyse)\nWideband(perrine) -> Vietnamese(perrine)\nVietnamese(perrine) -> Evidential(perrine)\nTinkling(perrine) -> Wideband(perrine)\n\nnot Tinkling(benetta)\n\nnot Tinkling(benetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Mead is fewer. Mandie is unstained. Mandie is populated. Karyn is not mercerised. Karyn is populated. Gonzalo is breakable. Gonzalo is not populated. If Mandie is fewer then Mandie is mercerised. If Mandie is mercerised then Mandie is ammonitic. If Mandie is unstained then Mandie is fewer. Gonzalo is mercerised.", "logic": "\nFewer(mead)\nUnstained(mandie)\nPopulated(mandie)\nnot Mercerised(karyn)\nPopulated(karyn)\nBreakable(gonzalo)\nnot Populated(gonzalo)\nFewer(mandie) -> Mercerised(mandie)\nMercerised(mandie) -> Ammonitic(mandie)\nUnstained(mandie) -> Fewer(mandie)\n\nMercerised(gonzalo)\n\nMercerised(gonzalo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Rosalinda is mesodermal. Ignacio is unarmed. Ignacio is retentive. Karsten is not rhodesian. Karsten is retentive. Shurlock is rotary. Shurlock is not retentive. If Ignacio is mesodermal then Ignacio is rhodesian. If Ignacio is rhodesian then Ignacio is rostrate. If Ignacio is unarmed then Ignacio is mesodermal. Rosalinda is not retentive.", "logic": "\nMesodermal(rosalinda)\nUnarmed(ignacio)\nRetentive(ignacio)\nnot Rhodesian(karsten)\nRetentive(karsten)\nRotary(shurlock)\nnot Retentive(shurlock)\nMesodermal(ignacio) -> Rhodesian(ignacio)\nRhodesian(ignacio) -> Rostrate(ignacio)\nUnarmed(ignacio) -> Mesodermal(ignacio)\n\nnot Retentive(rosalinda)\n\nnot Retentive(rosalinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Nicholas is paying. Junette is baroque. Junette is cacuminal. Gaston is not rubbery. Gaston is cacuminal. Leta is unwritten. Leta is not cacuminal. If Junette is paying then Junette is rubbery. If Junette is rubbery then Junette is fledged. If Junette is baroque then Junette is paying. Nicholas is unwritten.", "logic": "\nPaying(nicholas)\nBaroque(junette)\nCacuminal(junette)\nnot Rubbery(gaston)\nCacuminal(gaston)\nUnwritten(leta)\nnot Cacuminal(leta)\nPaying(junette) -> Rubbery(junette)\nRubbery(junette) -> Fledged(junette)\nBaroque(junette) -> Paying(junette)\n\nUnwritten(nicholas)\n\nUnwritten(nicholas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Sigrid is diaphyseal. Grover is hertzian. Grover is bimotored. Gladys is not autogenic. Gladys is bimotored. Aprilette is tautologic. Aprilette is not bimotored. If Grover is diaphyseal then Grover is autogenic. If Grover is autogenic then Grover is idolised. If Grover is hertzian then Grover is diaphyseal. Sigrid is not idolised.", "logic": "\nDiaphyseal(sigrid)\nHertzian(grover)\nBimotored(grover)\nnot Autogenic(gladys)\nBimotored(gladys)\nTautologic(aprilette)\nnot Bimotored(aprilette)\nDiaphyseal(grover) -> Autogenic(grover)\nAutogenic(grover) -> Idolised(grover)\nHertzian(grover) -> Diaphyseal(grover)\n\nnot Idolised(sigrid)\n\nnot Idolised(sigrid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "Cassandre is brittle. Rhodie is synaptic. Rhodie is unruly. Helise is not outer. Helise is unruly. Darcee is calendric. Darcee is not unruly. If Rhodie is brittle then Rhodie is outer. If Rhodie is outer then Rhodie is inhalant. If Rhodie is synaptic then Rhodie is brittle. Helise is brittle.", "logic": "\nBrittle(cassandre)\nSynaptic(rhodie)\nUnruly(rhodie)\nnot Outer(helise)\nUnruly(helise)\nCalendric(darcee)\nnot Unruly(darcee)\nBrittle(rhodie) -> Outer(rhodie)\nOuter(rhodie) -> Inhalant(rhodie)\nSynaptic(rhodie) -> Brittle(rhodie)\n\nBrittle(helise)\n\nBrittle(helise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-274"} {"premises": "The abra does not see the jannelle. The abra does not see the hermine. The abra interest the edmond. The jannelle obstinate the edmond. The jannelle interest the hermine. The edmond is cxxxv. The edmond is smothering. The edmond shutter the hermine. The edmond interest the abra. The edmond interest the jannelle. The hermine is smothering. The hermine shutter the abra. The hermine obstinate the abra. The hermine obstinate the jannelle. The hermine interest the edmond. If something is pestering then it does not like the abra. If something shutter the hermine and it obstinate the abra then it is pestering. If something shutter the hermine and the hermine interest the edmond then it obstinate the abra. The jannelle interest the hermine.", "logic": "\nnot Obstinate(abra, jannelle)\nnot Obstinate(abra, hermine)\nInterest(abra, edmond)\nObstinate(jannelle, edmond)\nInterest(jannelle, hermine)\nCxxxv(edmond)\nSmothering(edmond)\nShutter(edmond, hermine)\nInterest(edmond, abra)\nInterest(edmond, jannelle)\nSmothering(hermine)\nShutter(hermine, abra)\nObstinate(hermine, abra)\nObstinate(hermine, jannelle)\nInterest(hermine, edmond)\nforall x (Pestering(x) -> not Shutter(x, abra))\nforall x (Shutter(x, hermine) and Obstinate(x, abra) -> Pestering(x))\nforall x (Shutter(x, hermine) and Interest(hermine, edmond) -> Obstinate(x, abra))\n\nInterest(jannelle, hermine)\n\ntherefore Interest(jannelle, hermine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The antin does not see the fortuna. The antin does not see the hewitt. The antin skirl the fara. The fortuna transfuse the fara. The fortuna skirl the hewitt. The fara is malefic. The fara is mocking. The fara befriend the hewitt. The fara skirl the antin. The fara skirl the fortuna. The hewitt is mocking. The hewitt befriend the antin. The hewitt transfuse the antin. The hewitt transfuse the fortuna. The hewitt skirl the fara. If something is pelagic then it does not like the antin. If something befriend the hewitt and it transfuse the antin then it is pelagic. If something befriend the hewitt and the hewitt skirl the fara then it transfuse the antin. The hewitt is not mocking.", "logic": "\nnot Transfuse(antin, fortuna)\nnot Transfuse(antin, hewitt)\nSkirl(antin, fara)\nTransfuse(fortuna, fara)\nSkirl(fortuna, hewitt)\nMalefic(fara)\nMocking(fara)\nBefriend(fara, hewitt)\nSkirl(fara, antin)\nSkirl(fara, fortuna)\nMocking(hewitt)\nBefriend(hewitt, antin)\nTransfuse(hewitt, antin)\nTransfuse(hewitt, fortuna)\nSkirl(hewitt, fara)\nforall x (Pelagic(x) -> not Befriend(x, antin))\nforall x (Befriend(x, hewitt) and Transfuse(x, antin) -> Pelagic(x))\nforall x (Befriend(x, hewitt) and Skirl(hewitt, fara) -> Transfuse(x, antin))\n\nnot Mocking(hewitt)\n\ntherefore Mocking(hewitt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The kameko does not see the julius. The kameko does not see the forest. The kameko advertise the codee. The julius glimmer the codee. The julius advertise the forest. The codee is pampering. The codee is hairy. The codee bare the forest. The codee advertise the kameko. The codee advertise the julius. The forest is hairy. The forest bare the kameko. The forest glimmer the kameko. The forest glimmer the julius. The forest advertise the codee. If something is sensate then it does not like the kameko. If something bare the forest and it glimmer the kameko then it is sensate. If something bare the forest and the forest advertise the codee then it glimmer the kameko. The codee glimmer the kameko.", "logic": "\nnot Glimmer(kameko, julius)\nnot Glimmer(kameko, forest)\nAdvertise(kameko, codee)\nGlimmer(julius, codee)\nAdvertise(julius, forest)\nPampering(codee)\nHairy(codee)\nBare(codee, forest)\nAdvertise(codee, kameko)\nAdvertise(codee, julius)\nHairy(forest)\nBare(forest, kameko)\nGlimmer(forest, kameko)\nGlimmer(forest, julius)\nAdvertise(forest, codee)\nforall x (Sensate(x) -> not Bare(x, kameko))\nforall x (Bare(x, forest) and Glimmer(x, kameko) -> Sensate(x))\nforall x (Bare(x, forest) and Advertise(forest, codee) -> Glimmer(x, kameko))\n\nGlimmer(codee, kameko)\n\nBare(codee, forest) and Advertise(forest, codee) and forall x (Bare(x, forest) and Advertise(forest, codee) -> Glimmer(x, kameko)) -> therefore Glimmer(codee, kameko)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The kerri does not see the piotr. The kerri does not see the cathryn. The kerri cerebrate the roman. The piotr revisit the roman. The piotr cerebrate the cathryn. The roman is pustulate. The roman is probing. The roman answer the cathryn. The roman cerebrate the kerri. The roman cerebrate the piotr. The cathryn is probing. The cathryn answer the kerri. The cathryn revisit the kerri. The cathryn revisit the piotr. The cathryn cerebrate the roman. If something is unswayed then it does not like the kerri. If something answer the cathryn and it revisit the kerri then it is unswayed. If something answer the cathryn and the cathryn cerebrate the roman then it revisit the kerri. The roman does not see the kerri.", "logic": "\nnot Revisit(kerri, piotr)\nnot Revisit(kerri, cathryn)\nCerebrate(kerri, roman)\nRevisit(piotr, roman)\nCerebrate(piotr, cathryn)\nPustulate(roman)\nProbing(roman)\nAnswer(roman, cathryn)\nCerebrate(roman, kerri)\nCerebrate(roman, piotr)\nProbing(cathryn)\nAnswer(cathryn, kerri)\nRevisit(cathryn, kerri)\nRevisit(cathryn, piotr)\nCerebrate(cathryn, roman)\nforall x (Unswayed(x) -> not Answer(x, kerri))\nforall x (Answer(x, cathryn) and Revisit(x, kerri) -> Unswayed(x))\nforall x (Answer(x, cathryn) and Cerebrate(cathryn, roman) -> Revisit(x, kerri))\n\nnot Revisit(roman, kerri)\n\nAnswer(roman, cathryn) and Cerebrate(cathryn, roman) and forall x (Answer(x, cathryn) and Cerebrate(cathryn, roman) -> Revisit(x, kerri)) -> therefore Revisit(roman, kerri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The lionello does not see the florance. The lionello does not see the roze. The lionello overbear the torey. The florance beguile the torey. The florance overbear the roze. The torey is isotropous. The torey is motorised. The torey whelm the roze. The torey overbear the lionello. The torey overbear the florance. The roze is motorised. The roze whelm the lionello. The roze beguile the lionello. The roze beguile the florance. The roze overbear the torey. If something is afoot then it does not like the lionello. If something whelm the roze and it beguile the lionello then it is afoot. If something whelm the roze and the roze overbear the torey then it beguile the lionello. The torey is afoot.", "logic": "\nnot Beguile(lionello, florance)\nnot Beguile(lionello, roze)\nOverbear(lionello, torey)\nBeguile(florance, torey)\nOverbear(florance, roze)\nIsotropous(torey)\nMotorised(torey)\nWhelm(torey, roze)\nOverbear(torey, lionello)\nOverbear(torey, florance)\nMotorised(roze)\nWhelm(roze, lionello)\nBeguile(roze, lionello)\nBeguile(roze, florance)\nOverbear(roze, torey)\nforall x (Afoot(x) -> not Whelm(x, lionello))\nforall x (Whelm(x, roze) and Beguile(x, lionello) -> Afoot(x))\nforall x (Whelm(x, roze) and Overbear(roze, torey) -> Beguile(x, lionello))\n\nAfoot(torey)\n\nWhelm(torey, roze) and Overbear(roze, torey) and forall x (Whelm(x, roze) and Overbear(roze, torey) -> Beguile(x, lionello)) -> therefore Beguile(torey, lionello) Whelm(torey, roze) and Beguile(torey, lionello) and forall x (Whelm(x, roze) and Beguile(x, lionello) -> Afoot(x)) -> therefore Afoot(torey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The alisun does not see the fae. The alisun does not see the elsbeth. The alisun foredoom the ediva. The fae hose the ediva. The fae foredoom the elsbeth. The ediva is disparate. The ediva is coinciding. The ediva rice the elsbeth. The ediva foredoom the alisun. The ediva foredoom the fae. The elsbeth is coinciding. The elsbeth rice the alisun. The elsbeth hose the alisun. The elsbeth hose the fae. The elsbeth foredoom the ediva. If something is sophistic then it does not like the alisun. If something rice the elsbeth and it hose the alisun then it is sophistic. If something rice the elsbeth and the elsbeth foredoom the ediva then it hose the alisun. The ediva is not sophistic.", "logic": "\nnot Hose(alisun, fae)\nnot Hose(alisun, elsbeth)\nForedoom(alisun, ediva)\nHose(fae, ediva)\nForedoom(fae, elsbeth)\nDisparate(ediva)\nCoinciding(ediva)\nRice(ediva, elsbeth)\nForedoom(ediva, alisun)\nForedoom(ediva, fae)\nCoinciding(elsbeth)\nRice(elsbeth, alisun)\nHose(elsbeth, alisun)\nHose(elsbeth, fae)\nForedoom(elsbeth, ediva)\nforall x (Sophistic(x) -> not Rice(x, alisun))\nforall x (Rice(x, elsbeth) and Hose(x, alisun) -> Sophistic(x))\nforall x (Rice(x, elsbeth) and Foredoom(elsbeth, ediva) -> Hose(x, alisun))\n\nnot Sophistic(ediva)\n\nRice(ediva, elsbeth) and Foredoom(elsbeth, ediva) and forall x (Rice(x, elsbeth) and Foredoom(elsbeth, ediva) -> Hose(x, alisun)) -> therefore Hose(ediva, alisun) Rice(ediva, elsbeth) and Hose(ediva, alisun) and forall x (Rice(x, elsbeth) and Hose(x, alisun) -> Sophistic(x)) -> therefore Sophistic(ediva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The joell does not see the cori. The joell does not see the michelina. The joell fantasise the allis. The cori hitchhike the allis. The cori fantasise the michelina. The allis is unvarying. The allis is suffusive. The allis hobnob the michelina. The allis fantasise the joell. The allis fantasise the cori. The michelina is suffusive. The michelina hobnob the joell. The michelina hitchhike the joell. The michelina hitchhike the cori. The michelina fantasise the allis. If something is wolflike then it does not like the joell. If something hobnob the michelina and it hitchhike the joell then it is wolflike. If something hobnob the michelina and the michelina fantasise the allis then it hitchhike the joell. The allis does not like the joell.", "logic": "\nnot Hitchhike(joell, cori)\nnot Hitchhike(joell, michelina)\nFantasise(joell, allis)\nHitchhike(cori, allis)\nFantasise(cori, michelina)\nUnvarying(allis)\nSuffusive(allis)\nHobnob(allis, michelina)\nFantasise(allis, joell)\nFantasise(allis, cori)\nSuffusive(michelina)\nHobnob(michelina, joell)\nHitchhike(michelina, joell)\nHitchhike(michelina, cori)\nFantasise(michelina, allis)\nforall x (Wolflike(x) -> not Hobnob(x, joell))\nforall x (Hobnob(x, michelina) and Hitchhike(x, joell) -> Wolflike(x))\nforall x (Hobnob(x, michelina) and Fantasise(michelina, allis) -> Hitchhike(x, joell))\n\nnot Hobnob(allis, joell)\n\nHobnob(allis, michelina) and Fantasise(michelina, allis) and forall x (Hobnob(x, michelina) and Fantasise(michelina, allis) -> Hitchhike(x, joell)) -> therefore Hitchhike(allis, joell) Hobnob(allis, michelina) and Hitchhike(allis, joell) and forall x (Hobnob(x, michelina) and Hitchhike(x, joell) -> Wolflike(x)) -> therefore Wolflike(allis) Wolflike(allis) and forall x (Wolflike(x) -> not Hobnob(x, joell)) -> therefore not Hobnob(allis, joell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The ronna does not see the mariya. The ronna does not see the thadeus. The ronna abjure the raj. The mariya ease the raj. The mariya abjure the thadeus. The raj is bone. The raj is goalless. The raj overspend the thadeus. The raj abjure the ronna. The raj abjure the mariya. The thadeus is goalless. The thadeus overspend the ronna. The thadeus ease the ronna. The thadeus ease the mariya. The thadeus abjure the raj. If something is equatorial then it does not like the ronna. If something overspend the thadeus and it ease the ronna then it is equatorial. If something overspend the thadeus and the thadeus abjure the raj then it ease the ronna. The raj overspend the ronna.", "logic": "\nnot Ease(ronna, mariya)\nnot Ease(ronna, thadeus)\nAbjure(ronna, raj)\nEase(mariya, raj)\nAbjure(mariya, thadeus)\nBone(raj)\nGoalless(raj)\nOverspend(raj, thadeus)\nAbjure(raj, ronna)\nAbjure(raj, mariya)\nGoalless(thadeus)\nOverspend(thadeus, ronna)\nEase(thadeus, ronna)\nEase(thadeus, mariya)\nAbjure(thadeus, raj)\nforall x (Equatorial(x) -> not Overspend(x, ronna))\nforall x (Overspend(x, thadeus) and Ease(x, ronna) -> Equatorial(x))\nforall x (Overspend(x, thadeus) and Abjure(thadeus, raj) -> Ease(x, ronna))\n\nOverspend(raj, ronna)\n\nOverspend(raj, thadeus) and Abjure(thadeus, raj) and forall x (Overspend(x, thadeus) and Abjure(thadeus, raj) -> Ease(x, ronna)) -> therefore Ease(raj, ronna) Overspend(raj, thadeus) and Ease(raj, ronna) and forall x (Overspend(x, thadeus) and Ease(x, ronna) -> Equatorial(x)) -> therefore Equatorial(raj) Equatorial(raj) and forall x (Equatorial(x) -> not Overspend(x, ronna)) -> therefore not Overspend(raj, ronna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The idalina does not see the allegra. The idalina does not see the merna. The idalina warehouse the marje. The allegra hesitate the marje. The allegra warehouse the merna. The marje is walking. The marje is newsworthy. The marje broaden the merna. The marje warehouse the idalina. The marje warehouse the allegra. The merna is newsworthy. The merna broaden the idalina. The merna hesitate the idalina. The merna hesitate the allegra. The merna warehouse the marje. If something is anopheline then it does not like the idalina. If something broaden the merna and it hesitate the idalina then it is anopheline. If something broaden the merna and the merna warehouse the marje then it hesitate the idalina. The idalina is not anopheline.", "logic": "\nnot Hesitate(idalina, allegra)\nnot Hesitate(idalina, merna)\nWarehouse(idalina, marje)\nHesitate(allegra, marje)\nWarehouse(allegra, merna)\nWalking(marje)\nNewsworthy(marje)\nBroaden(marje, merna)\nWarehouse(marje, idalina)\nWarehouse(marje, allegra)\nNewsworthy(merna)\nBroaden(merna, idalina)\nHesitate(merna, idalina)\nHesitate(merna, allegra)\nWarehouse(merna, marje)\nforall x (Anopheline(x) -> not Broaden(x, idalina))\nforall x (Broaden(x, merna) and Hesitate(x, idalina) -> Anopheline(x))\nforall x (Broaden(x, merna) and Warehouse(merna, marje) -> Hesitate(x, idalina))\n\nnot Anopheline(idalina)\n\nforall x (Broaden(x, merna) and Hesitate(x, idalina) -> Anopheline(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The orella does not see the marybeth. The orella does not see the aylmer. The orella coincide the florence. The marybeth pulsate the florence. The marybeth coincide the aylmer. The florence is maxillary. The florence is arrayed. The florence warehouse the aylmer. The florence coincide the orella. The florence coincide the marybeth. The aylmer is arrayed. The aylmer warehouse the orella. The aylmer pulsate the orella. The aylmer pulsate the marybeth. The aylmer coincide the florence. If something is rapacious then it does not like the orella. If something warehouse the aylmer and it pulsate the orella then it is rapacious. If something warehouse the aylmer and the aylmer coincide the florence then it pulsate the orella. The marybeth pulsate the orella.", "logic": "\nnot Pulsate(orella, marybeth)\nnot Pulsate(orella, aylmer)\nCoincide(orella, florence)\nPulsate(marybeth, florence)\nCoincide(marybeth, aylmer)\nMaxillary(florence)\nArrayed(florence)\nWarehouse(florence, aylmer)\nCoincide(florence, orella)\nCoincide(florence, marybeth)\nArrayed(aylmer)\nWarehouse(aylmer, orella)\nPulsate(aylmer, orella)\nPulsate(aylmer, marybeth)\nCoincide(aylmer, florence)\nforall x (Rapacious(x) -> not Warehouse(x, orella))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, aylmer) and Pulsate(x, orella) -> Rapacious(x))\nforall x (Warehouse(x, aylmer) and Coincide(aylmer, florence) -> Pulsate(x, orella))\n\nPulsate(marybeth, orella)\n\nforall x (Warehouse(x, aylmer) and Coincide(aylmer, florence) -> Pulsate(x, orella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The ashley does not see the harold. The ashley does not see the aurie. The ashley pullulate the ardenia. The harold expend the ardenia. The harold pullulate the aurie. The ardenia is airheaded. The ardenia is plaguy. The ardenia revert the aurie. The ardenia pullulate the ashley. The ardenia pullulate the harold. The aurie is plaguy. The aurie revert the ashley. The aurie expend the ashley. The aurie expend the harold. The aurie pullulate the ardenia. If something is ungoverned then it does not like the ashley. If something revert the aurie and it expend the ashley then it is ungoverned. If something revert the aurie and the aurie pullulate the ardenia then it expend the ashley. The harold is not ungoverned.", "logic": "\nnot Expend(ashley, harold)\nnot Expend(ashley, aurie)\nPullulate(ashley, ardenia)\nExpend(harold, ardenia)\nPullulate(harold, aurie)\nAirheaded(ardenia)\nPlaguy(ardenia)\nRevert(ardenia, aurie)\nPullulate(ardenia, ashley)\nPullulate(ardenia, harold)\nPlaguy(aurie)\nRevert(aurie, ashley)\nExpend(aurie, ashley)\nExpend(aurie, harold)\nPullulate(aurie, ardenia)\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) -> not Revert(x, ashley))\nforall x (Revert(x, aurie) and Expend(x, ashley) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Revert(x, aurie) and Pullulate(aurie, ardenia) -> Expend(x, ashley))\n\nnot Ungoverned(harold)\n\nforall x (Revert(x, aurie) and Expend(x, ashley) -> Ungoverned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The vanny does not see the maia. The vanny does not see the gisela. The vanny foredate the timothea. The maia outline the timothea. The maia foredate the gisela. The timothea is reposeful. The timothea is voltaic. The timothea solidify the gisela. The timothea foredate the vanny. The timothea foredate the maia. The gisela is voltaic. The gisela solidify the vanny. The gisela outline the vanny. The gisela outline the maia. The gisela foredate the timothea. If something is laciniate then it does not like the vanny. If something solidify the gisela and it outline the vanny then it is laciniate. If something solidify the gisela and the gisela foredate the timothea then it outline the vanny. The vanny outline the vanny.", "logic": "\nnot Outline(vanny, maia)\nnot Outline(vanny, gisela)\nForedate(vanny, timothea)\nOutline(maia, timothea)\nForedate(maia, gisela)\nReposeful(timothea)\nVoltaic(timothea)\nSolidify(timothea, gisela)\nForedate(timothea, vanny)\nForedate(timothea, maia)\nVoltaic(gisela)\nSolidify(gisela, vanny)\nOutline(gisela, vanny)\nOutline(gisela, maia)\nForedate(gisela, timothea)\nforall x (Laciniate(x) -> not Solidify(x, vanny))\nforall x (Solidify(x, gisela) and Outline(x, vanny) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Solidify(x, gisela) and Foredate(gisela, timothea) -> Outline(x, vanny))\n\nOutline(vanny, vanny)\n\nforall x (Solidify(x, gisela) and Foredate(gisela, timothea) -> Outline(x, vanny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The elvera does not see the meggy. The elvera does not see the bambi. The elvera revalue the denys. The meggy mess the denys. The meggy revalue the bambi. The denys is cubiform. The denys is septic. The denys broom the bambi. The denys revalue the elvera. The denys revalue the meggy. The bambi is septic. The bambi broom the elvera. The bambi mess the elvera. The bambi mess the meggy. The bambi revalue the denys. If something is twofold then it does not like the elvera. If something broom the bambi and it mess the elvera then it is twofold. If something broom the bambi and the bambi revalue the denys then it mess the elvera. The meggy does not see the meggy.", "logic": "\nnot Mess(elvera, meggy)\nnot Mess(elvera, bambi)\nRevalue(elvera, denys)\nMess(meggy, denys)\nRevalue(meggy, bambi)\nCubiform(denys)\nSeptic(denys)\nBroom(denys, bambi)\nRevalue(denys, elvera)\nRevalue(denys, meggy)\nSeptic(bambi)\nBroom(bambi, elvera)\nMess(bambi, elvera)\nMess(bambi, meggy)\nRevalue(bambi, denys)\nforall x (Twofold(x) -> not Broom(x, elvera))\nforall x (Broom(x, bambi) and Mess(x, elvera) -> Twofold(x))\nforall x (Broom(x, bambi) and Revalue(bambi, denys) -> Mess(x, elvera))\n\nnot Mess(meggy, meggy)\n\nnot Mess(meggy, meggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The fredrick does not see the tabbatha. The fredrick does not see the euclid. The fredrick jiggle the berty. The tabbatha fizzle the berty. The tabbatha jiggle the euclid. The berty is soundable. The berty is riant. The berty fillet the euclid. The berty jiggle the fredrick. The berty jiggle the tabbatha. The euclid is riant. The euclid fillet the fredrick. The euclid fizzle the fredrick. The euclid fizzle the tabbatha. The euclid jiggle the berty. If something is equivalent then it does not like the fredrick. If something fillet the euclid and it fizzle the fredrick then it is equivalent. If something fillet the euclid and the euclid jiggle the berty then it fizzle the fredrick. The tabbatha is soundable.", "logic": "\nnot Fizzle(fredrick, tabbatha)\nnot Fizzle(fredrick, euclid)\nJiggle(fredrick, berty)\nFizzle(tabbatha, berty)\nJiggle(tabbatha, euclid)\nSoundable(berty)\nRiant(berty)\nFillet(berty, euclid)\nJiggle(berty, fredrick)\nJiggle(berty, tabbatha)\nRiant(euclid)\nFillet(euclid, fredrick)\nFizzle(euclid, fredrick)\nFizzle(euclid, tabbatha)\nJiggle(euclid, berty)\nforall x (Equivalent(x) -> not Fillet(x, fredrick))\nforall x (Fillet(x, euclid) and Fizzle(x, fredrick) -> Equivalent(x))\nforall x (Fillet(x, euclid) and Jiggle(euclid, berty) -> Fizzle(x, fredrick))\n\nSoundable(tabbatha)\n\nSoundable(tabbatha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The enoch does not see the wilburt. The enoch does not see the sebastian. The enoch crescendo the jotham. The wilburt ensconce the jotham. The wilburt crescendo the sebastian. The jotham is mellow. The jotham is perturbed. The jotham document the sebastian. The jotham crescendo the enoch. The jotham crescendo the wilburt. The sebastian is perturbed. The sebastian document the enoch. The sebastian ensconce the enoch. The sebastian ensconce the wilburt. The sebastian crescendo the jotham. If something is ursine then it does not like the enoch. If something document the sebastian and it ensconce the enoch then it is ursine. If something document the sebastian and the sebastian crescendo the jotham then it ensconce the enoch. The sebastian does not see the jotham.", "logic": "\nnot Ensconce(enoch, wilburt)\nnot Ensconce(enoch, sebastian)\nCrescendo(enoch, jotham)\nEnsconce(wilburt, jotham)\nCrescendo(wilburt, sebastian)\nMellow(jotham)\nPerturbed(jotham)\nDocument(jotham, sebastian)\nCrescendo(jotham, enoch)\nCrescendo(jotham, wilburt)\nPerturbed(sebastian)\nDocument(sebastian, enoch)\nEnsconce(sebastian, enoch)\nEnsconce(sebastian, wilburt)\nCrescendo(sebastian, jotham)\nforall x (Ursine(x) -> not Document(x, enoch))\nforall x (Document(x, sebastian) and Ensconce(x, enoch) -> Ursine(x))\nforall x (Document(x, sebastian) and Crescendo(sebastian, jotham) -> Ensconce(x, enoch))\n\nnot Ensconce(sebastian, jotham)\n\nnot Ensconce(sebastian, jotham) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The dolly does not see the sinclare. The dolly does not see the agretha. The dolly malign the kurtis. The sinclare whip the kurtis. The sinclare malign the agretha. The kurtis is unshapely. The kurtis is tumid. The kurtis swoosh the agretha. The kurtis malign the dolly. The kurtis malign the sinclare. The agretha is tumid. The agretha swoosh the dolly. The agretha whip the dolly. The agretha whip the sinclare. The agretha malign the kurtis. If something is catamenial then it does not like the dolly. If something swoosh the agretha and it whip the dolly then it is catamenial. If something swoosh the agretha and the agretha malign the kurtis then it whip the dolly. The kurtis swoosh the sinclare.", "logic": "\nnot Whip(dolly, sinclare)\nnot Whip(dolly, agretha)\nMalign(dolly, kurtis)\nWhip(sinclare, kurtis)\nMalign(sinclare, agretha)\nUnshapely(kurtis)\nTumid(kurtis)\nSwoosh(kurtis, agretha)\nMalign(kurtis, dolly)\nMalign(kurtis, sinclare)\nTumid(agretha)\nSwoosh(agretha, dolly)\nWhip(agretha, dolly)\nWhip(agretha, sinclare)\nMalign(agretha, kurtis)\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> not Swoosh(x, dolly))\nforall x (Swoosh(x, agretha) and Whip(x, dolly) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Swoosh(x, agretha) and Malign(agretha, kurtis) -> Whip(x, dolly))\n\nSwoosh(kurtis, sinclare)\n\nSwoosh(kurtis, sinclare) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The gaspar is gelatinous. All cathodic, housebound things are gelatinous. All gelatinous things are not pillared. Nice things are cathodic. The gaspar is gelatinous.", "logic": "\nGelatinous(gaspar)\nforall x (Cathodic(x) and Housebound(x) -> Gelatinous(x))\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) -> not Pillared(x))\nforall x (Gelatinous(x) -> Cathodic(x))\n\nGelatinous(gaspar)\n\ntherefore Gelatinous(gaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "The paulie is dressy. All raiding, vitiated things are dressy. All dressy things are not estranging. Nice things are raiding. The paulie is not dressy.", "logic": "\nDressy(paulie)\nforall x (Raiding(x) and Vitiated(x) -> Dressy(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) -> not Estranging(x))\nforall x (Dressy(x) -> Raiding(x))\n\nnot Dressy(paulie)\n\ntherefore Dressy(paulie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "The pammi is shiftless. All vinous, nett things are shiftless. All shiftless things are not upward. Nice things are vinous. The pammi is not upward.", "logic": "\nShiftless(pammi)\nforall x (Vinous(x) and Nett(x) -> Shiftless(x))\nforall x (Shiftless(x) -> not Upward(x))\nforall x (Shiftless(x) -> Vinous(x))\n\nnot Upward(pammi)\n\nShiftless(pammi) and forall x (Shiftless(x) -> not Upward(x)) -> therefore not Upward(pammi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "The fredrick is methodical. All miscible, clownish things are methodical. All methodical things are not twelfth. Nice things are miscible. The fredrick is not miscible.", "logic": "\nMethodical(fredrick)\nforall x (Miscible(x) and Clownish(x) -> Methodical(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> not Twelfth(x))\nforall x (Methodical(x) -> Miscible(x))\n\nnot Miscible(fredrick)\n\nMethodical(fredrick) and forall x (Methodical(x) -> Miscible(x)) -> therefore Miscible(fredrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "The dmitri is aeolian. All chockful, palpable things are aeolian. All aeolian things are not doleful. Nice things are chockful. The dmitri is not palpable.", "logic": "\nAeolian(dmitri)\nforall x (Chockful(x) and Palpable(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> not Doleful(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) -> Chockful(x))\n\nnot Palpable(dmitri)\n\nnot Palpable(dmitri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "The bernie is unfenced. All powdery, memorable things are unfenced. All unfenced things are not stomachic. Nice things are powdery. The bernie visits the bernie.", "logic": "\nUnfenced(bernie)\nforall x (Powdery(x) and Memorable(x) -> Unfenced(x))\nforall x (Unfenced(x) -> not Stomachic(x))\nforall x (Unfenced(x) -> Powdery(x))\n\nVisits(bernie, bernie)\n\nVisits(bernie, bernie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "The karleen is unshaken. All retarded, cherubic things are unshaken. All unshaken things are not impartial. Nice things are retarded. The karleen is not kind.", "logic": "\nUnshaken(karleen)\nforall x (Retarded(x) and Cherubic(x) -> Unshaken(x))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) -> not Impartial(x))\nforall x (Unshaken(x) -> Retarded(x))\n\nnot Kind(karleen)\n\nnot Kind(karleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "The felicdad is opencut. All very, otiose things are opencut. All opencut things are not generative. Nice things are very. The felicdad sees the felicdad.", "logic": "\nOpencut(felicdad)\nforall x (Very(x) and Otiose(x) -> Opencut(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> not Generative(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) -> Very(x))\n\nSees(felicdad, felicdad)\n\nSees(felicdad, felicdad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2990"} {"premises": "Werner is wearying. Kial is wearying. Rorie is diminutive. If something is diminutive then it is not partitive. If Rorie is not partitive then Rorie is wearying. If something is partitive and not diminutive then it is not bicornate. If something is secular and not diminutive then it is bicornate. Furry things are not bicornate. Rough things are not uncoerced. If something is wearying then it is secular. Furry things are not secular. Rorie is diminutive.", "logic": "\nWearying(werner)\nWearying(kial)\nDiminutive(rorie)\nforall x (Diminutive(x) -> not Partitive(x))\nnot Partitive(rorie) -> Wearying(rorie)\nforall x (Partitive(x) and not Diminutive(x) -> not Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Secular(x) and not Diminutive(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> not Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Bicornate(x) -> not Uncoerced(x))\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Secular(x))\nforall x (Uncoerced(x) -> not Secular(x))\n\nDiminutive(rorie)\n\ntherefore Diminutive(rorie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Townie is lymphoid. Shari is lymphoid. Stillman is abdominous. If something is abdominous then it is not modifiable. If Stillman is not modifiable then Stillman is lymphoid. If something is modifiable and not abdominous then it is not imposing. If something is fearless and not abdominous then it is imposing. Furry things are not imposing. Rough things are not drugged. If something is lymphoid then it is fearless. Furry things are not fearless. Stillman is not abdominous.", "logic": "\nLymphoid(townie)\nLymphoid(shari)\nAbdominous(stillman)\nforall x (Abdominous(x) -> not Modifiable(x))\nnot Modifiable(stillman) -> Lymphoid(stillman)\nforall x (Modifiable(x) and not Abdominous(x) -> not Imposing(x))\nforall x (Fearless(x) and not Abdominous(x) -> Imposing(x))\nforall x (Drugged(x) -> not Imposing(x))\nforall x (Imposing(x) -> not Drugged(x))\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Fearless(x))\nforall x (Drugged(x) -> not Fearless(x))\n\nnot Abdominous(stillman)\n\ntherefore Abdominous(stillman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Elliott is raining. Joselyn is raining. Amie is argentic. If something is argentic then it is not otic. If Amie is not otic then Amie is raining. If something is otic and not argentic then it is not leechlike. If something is indurate and not argentic then it is leechlike. Furry things are not leechlike. Rough things are not hundredth. If something is raining then it is indurate. Furry things are not indurate. Joselyn is indurate.", "logic": "\nRaining(elliott)\nRaining(joselyn)\nArgentic(amie)\nforall x (Argentic(x) -> not Otic(x))\nnot Otic(amie) -> Raining(amie)\nforall x (Otic(x) and not Argentic(x) -> not Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and not Argentic(x) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Hundredth(x) -> not Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Leechlike(x) -> not Hundredth(x))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Hundredth(x) -> not Indurate(x))\n\nIndurate(joselyn)\n\nRaining(joselyn) and forall x (Raining(x) -> Indurate(x)) -> therefore Indurate(joselyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Peta is summery. Crissy is summery. Dulcinea is mature. If something is mature then it is not dilatory. If Dulcinea is not dilatory then Dulcinea is summery. If something is dilatory and not mature then it is not assurgent. If something is rockbound and not mature then it is assurgent. Furry things are not assurgent. Rough things are not blistery. If something is summery then it is rockbound. Furry things are not rockbound. Peta is not rockbound.", "logic": "\nSummery(peta)\nSummery(crissy)\nMature(dulcinea)\nforall x (Mature(x) -> not Dilatory(x))\nnot Dilatory(dulcinea) -> Summery(dulcinea)\nforall x (Dilatory(x) and not Mature(x) -> not Assurgent(x))\nforall x (Rockbound(x) and not Mature(x) -> Assurgent(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> not Assurgent(x))\nforall x (Assurgent(x) -> not Blistery(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Rockbound(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> not Rockbound(x))\n\nnot Rockbound(peta)\n\nSummery(peta) and forall x (Summery(x) -> Rockbound(x)) -> therefore Rockbound(peta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Alexis is uncanny. Leorah is uncanny. Jacynth is floored. If something is floored then it is not irreverent. If Jacynth is not irreverent then Jacynth is uncanny. If something is irreverent and not floored then it is not sublunary. If something is trenchant and not floored then it is sublunary. Furry things are not sublunary. Rough things are not undershot. If something is uncanny then it is trenchant. Furry things are not trenchant. Jacynth is uncanny.", "logic": "\nUncanny(alexis)\nUncanny(leorah)\nFloored(jacynth)\nforall x (Floored(x) -> not Irreverent(x))\nnot Irreverent(jacynth) -> Uncanny(jacynth)\nforall x (Irreverent(x) and not Floored(x) -> not Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Trenchant(x) and not Floored(x) -> Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> not Sublunary(x))\nforall x (Sublunary(x) -> not Undershot(x))\nforall x (Uncanny(x) -> Trenchant(x))\nforall x (Undershot(x) -> not Trenchant(x))\n\nUncanny(jacynth)\n\nFloored(jacynth) and forall x (Floored(x) -> not Irreverent(x)) -> therefore not Irreverent(jacynth) not Irreverent(jacynth) and not Irreverent(jacynth) -> Uncanny(jacynth) -> therefore Uncanny(jacynth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Marge is buccal. Annnora is buccal. Elana is enchanted. If something is enchanted then it is not endermic. If Elana is not endermic then Elana is buccal. If something is endermic and not enchanted then it is not barbecued. If something is uneconomic and not enchanted then it is barbecued. Furry things are not barbecued. Rough things are not unskilled. If something is buccal then it is uneconomic. Furry things are not uneconomic. Elana is not buccal.", "logic": "\nBuccal(marge)\nBuccal(annnora)\nEnchanted(elana)\nforall x (Enchanted(x) -> not Endermic(x))\nnot Endermic(elana) -> Buccal(elana)\nforall x (Endermic(x) and not Enchanted(x) -> not Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Uneconomic(x) and not Enchanted(x) -> Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Unskilled(x) -> not Barbecued(x))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) -> not Unskilled(x))\nforall x (Buccal(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Unskilled(x) -> not Uneconomic(x))\n\nnot Buccal(elana)\n\nEnchanted(elana) and forall x (Enchanted(x) -> not Endermic(x)) -> therefore not Endermic(elana) not Endermic(elana) and not Endermic(elana) -> Buccal(elana) -> therefore Buccal(elana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Sela is teasing. Alden is teasing. Jyoti is smoothbore. If something is smoothbore then it is not inst. If Jyoti is not inst then Jyoti is teasing. If something is inst and not smoothbore then it is not brummagem. If something is pleased and not smoothbore then it is brummagem. Furry things are not brummagem. Rough things are not motorised. If something is teasing then it is pleased. Furry things are not pleased. Jyoti is pleased.", "logic": "\nTeasing(sela)\nTeasing(alden)\nSmoothbore(jyoti)\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) -> not Inst(x))\nnot Inst(jyoti) -> Teasing(jyoti)\nforall x (Inst(x) and not Smoothbore(x) -> not Brummagem(x))\nforall x (Pleased(x) and not Smoothbore(x) -> Brummagem(x))\nforall x (Motorised(x) -> not Brummagem(x))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> not Motorised(x))\nforall x (Teasing(x) -> Pleased(x))\nforall x (Motorised(x) -> not Pleased(x))\n\nPleased(jyoti)\n\nSmoothbore(jyoti) and forall x (Smoothbore(x) -> not Inst(x)) -> therefore not Inst(jyoti) not Inst(jyoti) and not Inst(jyoti) -> Teasing(jyoti) -> therefore Teasing(jyoti) Teasing(jyoti) and forall x (Teasing(x) -> Pleased(x)) -> therefore Pleased(jyoti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Lolly is oneiric. Carlita is oneiric. Annalise is easy. If something is easy then it is not anechoic. If Annalise is not anechoic then Annalise is oneiric. If something is anechoic and not easy then it is not licenced. If something is flying and not easy then it is licenced. Furry things are not licenced. Rough things are not roseate. If something is oneiric then it is flying. Furry things are not flying. Annalise is not flying.", "logic": "\nOneiric(lolly)\nOneiric(carlita)\nEasy(annalise)\nforall x (Easy(x) -> not Anechoic(x))\nnot Anechoic(annalise) -> Oneiric(annalise)\nforall x (Anechoic(x) and not Easy(x) -> not Licenced(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) and not Easy(x) -> Licenced(x))\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> not Licenced(x))\nforall x (Licenced(x) -> not Roseate(x))\nforall x (Oneiric(x) -> Flying(x))\nforall x (Roseate(x) -> not Flying(x))\n\nnot Flying(annalise)\n\nEasy(annalise) and forall x (Easy(x) -> not Anechoic(x)) -> therefore not Anechoic(annalise) not Anechoic(annalise) and not Anechoic(annalise) -> Oneiric(annalise) -> therefore Oneiric(annalise) Oneiric(annalise) and forall x (Oneiric(x) -> Flying(x)) -> therefore Flying(annalise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Merwin is genuine. Pier is genuine. Winnah is innumerate. If something is innumerate then it is not saprobic. If Winnah is not saprobic then Winnah is genuine. If something is saprobic and not innumerate then it is not uveal. If something is tectonic and not innumerate then it is uveal. Furry things are not uveal. Rough things are not grievous. If something is genuine then it is tectonic. Furry things are not tectonic. Merwin is not uveal.", "logic": "\nGenuine(merwin)\nGenuine(pier)\nInnumerate(winnah)\nforall x (Innumerate(x) -> not Saprobic(x))\nnot Saprobic(winnah) -> Genuine(winnah)\nforall x (Saprobic(x) and not Innumerate(x) -> not Uveal(x))\nforall x (Tectonic(x) and not Innumerate(x) -> Uveal(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) -> not Uveal(x))\nforall x (Uveal(x) -> not Grievous(x))\nforall x (Genuine(x) -> Tectonic(x))\nforall x (Grievous(x) -> not Tectonic(x))\n\nnot Uveal(merwin)\n\nforall x (Tectonic(x) and not Innumerate(x) -> Uveal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Portia is plantar. Oswell is plantar. Analise is velvety. If something is velvety then it is not looted. If Analise is not looted then Analise is plantar. If something is looted and not velvety then it is not salt. If something is fragmental and not velvety then it is salt. Furry things are not salt. Rough things are not ossiculate. If something is plantar then it is fragmental. Furry things are not fragmental. Analise is salt.", "logic": "\nPlantar(portia)\nPlantar(oswell)\nVelvety(analise)\nforall x (Velvety(x) -> not Looted(x))\nnot Looted(analise) -> Plantar(analise)\nforall x (Looted(x) and not Velvety(x) -> not Salt(x))\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and not Velvety(x) -> Salt(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> not Salt(x))\nforall x (Salt(x) -> not Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Plantar(x) -> Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> not Fragmental(x))\n\nSalt(analise)\n\nforall x (Fragmental(x) and not Velvety(x) -> Salt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Estrella is pristine. Sibylla is pristine. Justis is asian. If something is asian then it is not rested. If Justis is not rested then Justis is pristine. If something is rested and not asian then it is not ashy. If something is skilful and not asian then it is ashy. Furry things are not ashy. Rough things are not spouting. If something is pristine then it is skilful. Furry things are not skilful. Sibylla is not ashy.", "logic": "\nPristine(estrella)\nPristine(sibylla)\nAsian(justis)\nforall x (Asian(x) -> not Rested(x))\nnot Rested(justis) -> Pristine(justis)\nforall x (Rested(x) and not Asian(x) -> not Ashy(x))\nforall x (Skilful(x) and not Asian(x) -> Ashy(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> not Ashy(x))\nforall x (Ashy(x) -> not Spouting(x))\nforall x (Pristine(x) -> Skilful(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> not Skilful(x))\n\nnot Ashy(sibylla)\n\nforall x (Skilful(x) and not Asian(x) -> Ashy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Dottie is fishy. Doe is fishy. Aurelea is exact. If something is exact then it is not lossless. If Aurelea is not lossless then Aurelea is fishy. If something is lossless and not exact then it is not intrastate. If something is indolent and not exact then it is intrastate. Furry things are not intrastate. Rough things are not centesimal. If something is fishy then it is indolent. Furry things are not indolent. Dottie is exact.", "logic": "\nFishy(dottie)\nFishy(doe)\nExact(aurelea)\nforall x (Exact(x) -> not Lossless(x))\nnot Lossless(aurelea) -> Fishy(aurelea)\nforall x (Lossless(x) and not Exact(x) -> not Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Indolent(x) and not Exact(x) -> Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> not Intrastate(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) -> not Centesimal(x))\nforall x (Fishy(x) -> Indolent(x))\nforall x (Centesimal(x) -> not Indolent(x))\n\nExact(dottie)\n\nExact(dottie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Julita is undersize. Iggy is undersize. Bronson is faraway. If something is faraway then it is not ankylotic. If Bronson is not ankylotic then Bronson is undersize. If something is ankylotic and not faraway then it is not demulcent. If something is overladen and not faraway then it is demulcent. Furry things are not demulcent. Rough things are not pronged. If something is undersize then it is overladen. Furry things are not overladen. Iggy is not smart.", "logic": "\nUndersize(julita)\nUndersize(iggy)\nFaraway(bronson)\nforall x (Faraway(x) -> not Ankylotic(x))\nnot Ankylotic(bronson) -> Undersize(bronson)\nforall x (Ankylotic(x) and not Faraway(x) -> not Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Overladen(x) and not Faraway(x) -> Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Pronged(x) -> not Demulcent(x))\nforall x (Demulcent(x) -> not Pronged(x))\nforall x (Undersize(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Pronged(x) -> not Overladen(x))\n\nnot Smart(iggy)\n\nnot Smart(iggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Starlene is chapfallen. Damian is chapfallen. Benedikta is astir. If something is astir then it is not exulting. If Benedikta is not exulting then Benedikta is chapfallen. If something is exulting and not astir then it is not valueless. If something is unoiled and not astir then it is valueless. Furry things are not valueless. Rough things are not median. If something is chapfallen then it is unoiled. Furry things are not unoiled. Starlene is exulting.", "logic": "\nChapfallen(starlene)\nChapfallen(damian)\nAstir(benedikta)\nforall x (Astir(x) -> not Exulting(x))\nnot Exulting(benedikta) -> Chapfallen(benedikta)\nforall x (Exulting(x) and not Astir(x) -> not Valueless(x))\nforall x (Unoiled(x) and not Astir(x) -> Valueless(x))\nforall x (Median(x) -> not Valueless(x))\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> not Median(x))\nforall x (Chapfallen(x) -> Unoiled(x))\nforall x (Median(x) -> not Unoiled(x))\n\nExulting(starlene)\n\nExulting(starlene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "James is remote. Nealy is remote. Marty is algal. If something is algal then it is not balconied. If Marty is not balconied then Marty is remote. If something is balconied and not algal then it is not italian. If something is appealing and not algal then it is italian. Furry things are not italian. Rough things are not baccate. If something is remote then it is appealing. Furry things are not appealing. James is not smart.", "logic": "\nRemote(james)\nRemote(nealy)\nAlgal(marty)\nforall x (Algal(x) -> not Balconied(x))\nnot Balconied(marty) -> Remote(marty)\nforall x (Balconied(x) and not Algal(x) -> not Italian(x))\nforall x (Appealing(x) and not Algal(x) -> Italian(x))\nforall x (Baccate(x) -> not Italian(x))\nforall x (Italian(x) -> not Baccate(x))\nforall x (Remote(x) -> Appealing(x))\nforall x (Baccate(x) -> not Appealing(x))\n\nnot Smart(james)\n\nnot Smart(james) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Rhianon is nubile. Leandra is nubile. Cherye is eponymous. If something is eponymous then it is not undoable. If Cherye is not undoable then Cherye is nubile. If something is undoable and not eponymous then it is not panoptic. If something is assertive and not eponymous then it is panoptic. Furry things are not panoptic. Rough things are not aware. If something is nubile then it is assertive. Furry things are not assertive. Leandra is aware.", "logic": "\nNubile(rhianon)\nNubile(leandra)\nEponymous(cherye)\nforall x (Eponymous(x) -> not Undoable(x))\nnot Undoable(cherye) -> Nubile(cherye)\nforall x (Undoable(x) and not Eponymous(x) -> not Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Assertive(x) and not Eponymous(x) -> Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Aware(x) -> not Panoptic(x))\nforall x (Panoptic(x) -> not Aware(x))\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Assertive(x))\nforall x (Aware(x) -> not Assertive(x))\n\nAware(leandra)\n\nAware(leandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1067"} {"premises": "Elihu is barbarous. Adolphe is barbarous. Sloan is preventive. Kylila is acneiform. All burrlike people are acneiform. If someone is burrlike and acneiform then they are unironed. All preventive people are burrlike. Sloan is preventive.", "logic": "\nBarbarous(elihu)\nBarbarous(adolphe)\nPreventive(sloan)\nAcneiform(kylila)\nforall x (Burrlike(x) -> Acneiform(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) and Acneiform(x) -> Unironed(x))\nforall x (Preventive(x) -> Burrlike(x))\n\nPreventive(sloan)\n\ntherefore Preventive(sloan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Corena is distrait. Kiley is distrait. Lucienne is mastoid. Terence is eventual. All velvety people are eventual. If someone is velvety and eventual then they are unsure. All mastoid people are velvety. Corena is not distrait.", "logic": "\nDistrait(corena)\nDistrait(kiley)\nMastoid(lucienne)\nEventual(terence)\nforall x (Velvety(x) -> Eventual(x))\nforall x (Velvety(x) and Eventual(x) -> Unsure(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) -> Velvety(x))\n\nnot Distrait(corena)\n\ntherefore Distrait(corena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Torie is decisive. Taddeo is decisive. Dea is wayfaring. Darius is freckled. All untucked people are freckled. If someone is untucked and freckled then they are agreed. All wayfaring people are untucked. Dea is untucked.", "logic": "\nDecisive(torie)\nDecisive(taddeo)\nWayfaring(dea)\nFreckled(darius)\nforall x (Untucked(x) -> Freckled(x))\nforall x (Untucked(x) and Freckled(x) -> Agreed(x))\nforall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Untucked(x))\n\nUntucked(dea)\n\nWayfaring(dea) and forall x (Wayfaring(x) -> Untucked(x)) -> therefore Untucked(dea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Vina is initiative. Delcina is initiative. Anthe is worst. Lynette is upended. All urbanised people are upended. If someone is urbanised and upended then they are offending. All worst people are urbanised. Anthe is not urbanised.", "logic": "\nInitiative(vina)\nInitiative(delcina)\nWorst(anthe)\nUpended(lynette)\nforall x (Urbanised(x) -> Upended(x))\nforall x (Urbanised(x) and Upended(x) -> Offending(x))\nforall x (Worst(x) -> Urbanised(x))\n\nnot Urbanised(anthe)\n\nWorst(anthe) and forall x (Worst(x) -> Urbanised(x)) -> therefore Urbanised(anthe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Erik is antiguan. Kacey is antiguan. Moira is ceylonese. Lisandra is tamable. All querulous people are tamable. If someone is querulous and tamable then they are unthawed. All ceylonese people are querulous. Moira is tamable.", "logic": "\nAntiguan(erik)\nAntiguan(kacey)\nCeylonese(moira)\nTamable(lisandra)\nforall x (Querulous(x) -> Tamable(x))\nforall x (Querulous(x) and Tamable(x) -> Unthawed(x))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Querulous(x))\n\nTamable(moira)\n\nCeylonese(moira) and forall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Querulous(x)) -> therefore Querulous(moira) Querulous(moira) and forall x (Querulous(x) -> Tamable(x)) -> therefore Tamable(moira)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Sheelah is incurvate. Kelcie is incurvate. Othilia is carpal. Othella is judaical. All slouchy people are judaical. If someone is slouchy and judaical then they are brimming. All carpal people are slouchy. Othilia is not judaical.", "logic": "\nIncurvate(sheelah)\nIncurvate(kelcie)\nCarpal(othilia)\nJudaical(othella)\nforall x (Slouchy(x) -> Judaical(x))\nforall x (Slouchy(x) and Judaical(x) -> Brimming(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> Slouchy(x))\n\nnot Judaical(othilia)\n\nCarpal(othilia) and forall x (Carpal(x) -> Slouchy(x)) -> therefore Slouchy(othilia) Slouchy(othilia) and forall x (Slouchy(x) -> Judaical(x)) -> therefore Judaical(othilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Hunter is driving. Winfield is driving. Marlyn is favourable. Sinclare is amidship. All stretched people are amidship. If someone is stretched and amidship then they are cloven. All favourable people are stretched. Marlyn is cloven.", "logic": "\nDriving(hunter)\nDriving(winfield)\nFavourable(marlyn)\nAmidship(sinclare)\nforall x (Stretched(x) -> Amidship(x))\nforall x (Stretched(x) and Amidship(x) -> Cloven(x))\nforall x (Favourable(x) -> Stretched(x))\n\nCloven(marlyn)\n\nFavourable(marlyn) and forall x (Favourable(x) -> Stretched(x)) -> therefore Stretched(marlyn) Favourable(marlyn) and forall x (Favourable(x) -> Stretched(x)) -> therefore Stretched(marlyn) Stretched(marlyn) and forall x (Stretched(x) -> Amidship(x)) -> therefore Amidship(marlyn) Stretched(marlyn) and Amidship(marlyn) and forall x (Stretched(x) and Amidship(x) -> Cloven(x)) -> therefore Cloven(marlyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Camella is adagio. Claudie is adagio. Jordy is valiant. Donnajean is theatrical. All inhumane people are theatrical. If someone is inhumane and theatrical then they are culpable. All valiant people are inhumane. Jordy is not culpable.", "logic": "\nAdagio(camella)\nAdagio(claudie)\nValiant(jordy)\nTheatrical(donnajean)\nforall x (Inhumane(x) -> Theatrical(x))\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Theatrical(x) -> Culpable(x))\nforall x (Valiant(x) -> Inhumane(x))\n\nnot Culpable(jordy)\n\nValiant(jordy) and forall x (Valiant(x) -> Inhumane(x)) -> therefore Inhumane(jordy) Valiant(jordy) and forall x (Valiant(x) -> Inhumane(x)) -> therefore Inhumane(jordy) Inhumane(jordy) and forall x (Inhumane(x) -> Theatrical(x)) -> therefore Theatrical(jordy) Inhumane(jordy) and Theatrical(jordy) and forall x (Inhumane(x) and Theatrical(x) -> Culpable(x)) -> therefore Culpable(jordy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Randee is aldehydic. Carolin is aldehydic. Goldarina is passee. Darla is amoebic. All aneurismal people are amoebic. If someone is aneurismal and amoebic then they are renowned. All passee people are aneurismal. Carolin is not aneurismal.", "logic": "\nAldehydic(randee)\nAldehydic(carolin)\nPassee(goldarina)\nAmoebic(darla)\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Amoebic(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) and Amoebic(x) -> Renowned(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Aneurismal(x))\n\nnot Aneurismal(carolin)\n\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Aneurismal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Randa is islamic. Heide is islamic. Allyson is flowing. Bailey is striking. All algid people are striking. If someone is algid and striking then they are monosemous. All flowing people are algid. Bailey is monosemous.", "logic": "\nIslamic(randa)\nIslamic(heide)\nFlowing(allyson)\nStriking(bailey)\nforall x (Algid(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Algid(x) and Striking(x) -> Monosemous(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Algid(x))\n\nMonosemous(bailey)\n\nforall x (Algid(x) and Striking(x) -> Monosemous(x)) <- forall x (Flowing(x) -> Algid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Emera is cussed. Ronni is cussed. Rodney is suppliant. Adena is agrypnotic. All bedridden people are agrypnotic. If someone is bedridden and agrypnotic then they are infernal. All suppliant people are bedridden. Ronni is not infernal.", "logic": "\nCussed(emera)\nCussed(ronni)\nSuppliant(rodney)\nAgrypnotic(adena)\nforall x (Bedridden(x) -> Agrypnotic(x))\nforall x (Bedridden(x) and Agrypnotic(x) -> Infernal(x))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Bedridden(x))\n\nnot Infernal(ronni)\n\nforall x (Bedridden(x) and Agrypnotic(x) -> Infernal(x)) <- forall x (Suppliant(x) -> Bedridden(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Ferguson is canny. Ramsey is canny. Wiley is nonelected. Hillard is disloyal. All desiccate people are disloyal. If someone is desiccate and disloyal then they are trilobated. All nonelected people are desiccate. Ferguson is disloyal.", "logic": "\nCanny(ferguson)\nCanny(ramsey)\nNonelected(wiley)\nDisloyal(hillard)\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> Disloyal(x))\nforall x (Desiccate(x) and Disloyal(x) -> Trilobated(x))\nforall x (Nonelected(x) -> Desiccate(x))\n\nDisloyal(ferguson)\n\nforall x (Desiccate(x) -> Disloyal(x)) <- forall x (Nonelected(x) -> Desiccate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Pablo is goalless. Coleman is goalless. Zebedee is nippy. Gideon is caducous. All orthogonal people are caducous. If someone is orthogonal and caducous then they are deniable. All nippy people are orthogonal. Pablo is not nippy.", "logic": "\nGoalless(pablo)\nGoalless(coleman)\nNippy(zebedee)\nCaducous(gideon)\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) -> Caducous(x))\nforall x (Orthogonal(x) and Caducous(x) -> Deniable(x))\nforall x (Nippy(x) -> Orthogonal(x))\n\nnot Nippy(pablo)\n\nnot Nippy(pablo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Suzann is hollow. Alecia is hollow. Laurie is gambian. Bard is printable. All causative people are printable. If someone is causative and printable then they are acanthotic. All gambian people are causative. Laurie is furry.", "logic": "\nHollow(suzann)\nHollow(alecia)\nGambian(laurie)\nPrintable(bard)\nforall x (Causative(x) -> Printable(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) and Printable(x) -> Acanthotic(x))\nforall x (Gambian(x) -> Causative(x))\n\nFurry(laurie)\n\nFurry(laurie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Wren is diarrhoeal. Junie is diarrhoeal. Susan is repayable. Cassie is clotted. All timbered people are clotted. If someone is timbered and clotted then they are turbid. All repayable people are timbered. Wren is not furry.", "logic": "\nDiarrhoeal(wren)\nDiarrhoeal(junie)\nRepayable(susan)\nClotted(cassie)\nforall x (Timbered(x) -> Clotted(x))\nforall x (Timbered(x) and Clotted(x) -> Turbid(x))\nforall x (Repayable(x) -> Timbered(x))\n\nnot Furry(wren)\n\nnot Furry(wren) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "Geo is diurnal. Kaylil is diurnal. Englebart is lamplit. Janey is autoecious. All derisive people are autoecious. If someone is derisive and autoecious then they are nuts. All lamplit people are derisive. Janey is quiet.", "logic": "\nDiurnal(geo)\nDiurnal(kaylil)\nLamplit(englebart)\nAutoecious(janey)\nforall x (Derisive(x) -> Autoecious(x))\nforall x (Derisive(x) and Autoecious(x) -> Nuts(x))\nforall x (Lamplit(x) -> Derisive(x))\n\nQuiet(janey)\n\nQuiet(janey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1621"} {"premises": "The linea is surviving. The melonie peck the rubetta. The rubetta is cringing. If something bulwark the rubetta and it bulwark the linea then the linea does not visit the melonie. If something spike the rubetta and it does not visit the rubetta then the rubetta spike the linea. If something is impacted and it bulwark the linea then the linea bulwark the rubetta. If something spike the rubetta then it is not optative. If something bulwark the melonie and it does not visit the linea then the melonie is self. If something is surviving then it spike the rubetta. The melonie peck the rubetta.", "logic": "\nSurviving(linea)\nPeck(melonie, rubetta)\nCringing(rubetta)\nforall x (Bulwark(x, rubetta) and Bulwark(x, linea) -> not Peck(linea, melonie))\nforall x (Spike(x, rubetta) and not Peck(x, rubetta) -> Spike(rubetta, linea))\nforall x (Impacted(x) and Bulwark(x, linea) -> Bulwark(linea, rubetta))\nforall x (Spike(x, rubetta) -> not Optative(x))\nforall x (Bulwark(x, melonie) and not Peck(x, linea) -> Self(melonie))\nforall x (Surviving(x) -> Spike(x, rubetta))\n\nPeck(melonie, rubetta)\n\ntherefore Peck(melonie, rubetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The justin is measly. The rem cache the wade. The wade is requisite. If something stand the wade and it stand the justin then the justin does not visit the rem. If something quiz the wade and it does not visit the wade then the wade quiz the justin. If something is popliteal and it stand the justin then the justin stand the wade. If something quiz the wade then it is not hedonic. If something stand the rem and it does not visit the justin then the rem is warning. If something is measly then it quiz the wade. The wade is not requisite.", "logic": "\nMeasly(justin)\nCache(rem, wade)\nRequisite(wade)\nforall x (Stand(x, wade) and Stand(x, justin) -> not Cache(justin, rem))\nforall x (Quiz(x, wade) and not Cache(x, wade) -> Quiz(wade, justin))\nforall x (Popliteal(x) and Stand(x, justin) -> Stand(justin, wade))\nforall x (Quiz(x, wade) -> not Hedonic(x))\nforall x (Stand(x, rem) and not Cache(x, justin) -> Warning(rem))\nforall x (Measly(x) -> Quiz(x, wade))\n\nnot Requisite(wade)\n\ntherefore Requisite(wade)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The luciano is unaerated. The odelia wank the helise. The helise is squinty. If something expel the helise and it expel the luciano then the luciano does not visit the odelia. If something fare the helise and it does not visit the helise then the helise fare the luciano. If something is xcii and it expel the luciano then the luciano expel the helise. If something fare the helise then it is not crustacean. If something expel the odelia and it does not visit the luciano then the odelia is canty. If something is unaerated then it fare the helise. The luciano fare the helise.", "logic": "\nUnaerated(luciano)\nWank(odelia, helise)\nSquinty(helise)\nforall x (Expel(x, helise) and Expel(x, luciano) -> not Wank(luciano, odelia))\nforall x (Fare(x, helise) and not Wank(x, helise) -> Fare(helise, luciano))\nforall x (Xcii(x) and Expel(x, luciano) -> Expel(luciano, helise))\nforall x (Fare(x, helise) -> not Crustacean(x))\nforall x (Expel(x, odelia) and not Wank(x, luciano) -> Canty(odelia))\nforall x (Unaerated(x) -> Fare(x, helise))\n\nFare(luciano, helise)\n\nUnaerated(luciano) and forall x (Unaerated(x) -> Fare(x, helise)) -> therefore Fare(luciano, helise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The levin is dianoetic. The corine finish the laurence. The laurence is sessile. If something exceed the laurence and it exceed the levin then the levin does not visit the corine. If something scurry the laurence and it does not visit the laurence then the laurence scurry the levin. If something is horizontal and it exceed the levin then the levin exceed the laurence. If something scurry the laurence then it is not guinean. If something exceed the corine and it does not visit the levin then the corine is chronic. If something is dianoetic then it scurry the laurence. The levin does not chase the laurence.", "logic": "\nDianoetic(levin)\nFinish(corine, laurence)\nSessile(laurence)\nforall x (Exceed(x, laurence) and Exceed(x, levin) -> not Finish(levin, corine))\nforall x (Scurry(x, laurence) and not Finish(x, laurence) -> Scurry(laurence, levin))\nforall x (Horizontal(x) and Exceed(x, levin) -> Exceed(levin, laurence))\nforall x (Scurry(x, laurence) -> not Guinean(x))\nforall x (Exceed(x, corine) and not Finish(x, levin) -> Chronic(corine))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) -> Scurry(x, laurence))\n\nnot Scurry(levin, laurence)\n\nDianoetic(levin) and forall x (Dianoetic(x) -> Scurry(x, laurence)) -> therefore Scurry(levin, laurence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The jessika is acetic. The cynthie mislead the simonne. The simonne is papistic. If something bunco the simonne and it bunco the jessika then the jessika does not visit the cynthie. If something bleach the simonne and it does not visit the simonne then the simonne bleach the jessika. If something is connected and it bunco the jessika then the jessika bunco the simonne. If something bleach the simonne then it is not eyed. If something bunco the cynthie and it does not visit the jessika then the cynthie is uncounted. If something is acetic then it bleach the simonne. The cynthie does not chase the simonne.", "logic": "\nAcetic(jessika)\nMislead(cynthie, simonne)\nPapistic(simonne)\nforall x (Bunco(x, simonne) and Bunco(x, jessika) -> not Mislead(jessika, cynthie))\nforall x (Bleach(x, simonne) and not Mislead(x, simonne) -> Bleach(simonne, jessika))\nforall x (Connected(x) and Bunco(x, jessika) -> Bunco(jessika, simonne))\nforall x (Bleach(x, simonne) -> not Eyed(x))\nforall x (Bunco(x, cynthie) and not Mislead(x, jessika) -> Uncounted(cynthie))\nforall x (Acetic(x) -> Bleach(x, simonne))\n\nnot Bleach(cynthie, simonne)\n\nforall x (Acetic(x) -> Bleach(x, simonne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The tamarra is parabolic. The lucky cringe the deirdre. The deirdre is centrical. If something devaluate the deirdre and it devaluate the tamarra then the tamarra does not visit the lucky. If something guttle the deirdre and it does not visit the deirdre then the deirdre guttle the tamarra. If something is intimal and it devaluate the tamarra then the tamarra devaluate the deirdre. If something guttle the deirdre then it is not archducal. If something devaluate the lucky and it does not visit the tamarra then the lucky is radiating. If something is parabolic then it guttle the deirdre. The tamarra devaluate the deirdre.", "logic": "\nParabolic(tamarra)\nCringe(lucky, deirdre)\nCentrical(deirdre)\nforall x (Devaluate(x, deirdre) and Devaluate(x, tamarra) -> not Cringe(tamarra, lucky))\nforall x (Guttle(x, deirdre) and not Cringe(x, deirdre) -> Guttle(deirdre, tamarra))\nforall x (Intimal(x) and Devaluate(x, tamarra) -> Devaluate(tamarra, deirdre))\nforall x (Guttle(x, deirdre) -> not Archducal(x))\nforall x (Devaluate(x, lucky) and not Cringe(x, tamarra) -> Radiating(lucky))\nforall x (Parabolic(x) -> Guttle(x, deirdre))\n\nDevaluate(tamarra, deirdre)\n\nforall x (Intimal(x) and Devaluate(x, tamarra) -> Devaluate(tamarra, deirdre)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The thane is degraded. The harrison marinade the franz. The franz is racemose. If something stenograph the franz and it stenograph the thane then the thane does not visit the harrison. If something shallow the franz and it does not visit the franz then the franz shallow the thane. If something is splintery and it stenograph the thane then the thane stenograph the franz. If something shallow the franz then it is not superior. If something stenograph the harrison and it does not visit the thane then the harrison is distinct. If something is degraded then it shallow the franz. The franz is not superior.", "logic": "\nDegraded(thane)\nMarinade(harrison, franz)\nRacemose(franz)\nforall x (Stenograph(x, franz) and Stenograph(x, thane) -> not Marinade(thane, harrison))\nforall x (Shallow(x, franz) and not Marinade(x, franz) -> Shallow(franz, thane))\nforall x (Splintery(x) and Stenograph(x, thane) -> Stenograph(thane, franz))\nforall x (Shallow(x, franz) -> not Superior(x))\nforall x (Stenograph(x, harrison) and not Marinade(x, thane) -> Distinct(harrison))\nforall x (Degraded(x) -> Shallow(x, franz))\n\nnot Superior(franz)\n\nnot Superior(franz) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The elyse is impeccable. The burgess gather the hall. The hall is puzzled. If something brabble the hall and it brabble the elyse then the elyse does not visit the burgess. If something unearth the hall and it does not visit the hall then the hall unearth the elyse. If something is cosmologic and it brabble the elyse then the elyse brabble the hall. If something unearth the hall then it is not vagile. If something brabble the burgess and it does not visit the elyse then the burgess is tearful. If something is impeccable then it unearth the hall. The elyse gather the hall.", "logic": "\nImpeccable(elyse)\nGather(burgess, hall)\nPuzzled(hall)\nforall x (Brabble(x, hall) and Brabble(x, elyse) -> not Gather(elyse, burgess))\nforall x (Unearth(x, hall) and not Gather(x, hall) -> Unearth(hall, elyse))\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) and Brabble(x, elyse) -> Brabble(elyse, hall))\nforall x (Unearth(x, hall) -> not Vagile(x))\nforall x (Brabble(x, burgess) and not Gather(x, elyse) -> Tearful(burgess))\nforall x (Impeccable(x) -> Unearth(x, hall))\n\nGather(elyse, hall)\n\nGather(elyse, hall) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-2156"} {"premises": "The coralyn is sardinian. The coralyn is skanky. The coralyn is shintoist. The coralyn is renewed. The coralyn is wesleyan. All skanky, renewed things are shintoist. Green, skanky things are sardinian. If the coralyn is wesleyan and the coralyn is sardinian then the coralyn is skanky. The coralyn is wesleyan.", "logic": "\nSardinian(coralyn)\nSkanky(coralyn)\nShintoist(coralyn)\nRenewed(coralyn)\nWesleyan(coralyn)\nforall x (Skanky(x) and Renewed(x) -> Shintoist(x))\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and Skanky(x) -> Sardinian(x))\nWesleyan(coralyn) and Sardinian(coralyn) -> Skanky(coralyn)\n\nWesleyan(coralyn)\n\ntherefore Wesleyan(coralyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1430"} {"premises": "The ema is blushing. The ema is farfetched. The ema is augmented. The ema is meltable. The ema is psychotic. All farfetched, meltable things are augmented. Green, farfetched things are blushing. If the ema is psychotic and the ema is blushing then the ema is farfetched. The ema is not augmented.", "logic": "\nBlushing(ema)\nFarfetched(ema)\nAugmented(ema)\nMeltable(ema)\nPsychotic(ema)\nforall x (Farfetched(x) and Meltable(x) -> Augmented(x))\nforall x (Augmented(x) and Farfetched(x) -> Blushing(x))\nPsychotic(ema) and Blushing(ema) -> Farfetched(ema)\n\nnot Augmented(ema)\n\ntherefore Augmented(ema)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1430"} {"premises": "The shelton is subscribed. The shelton is columbian. The shelton is habitual. The shelton is unavowed. The shelton is unfixed. All columbian, unavowed things are habitual. Green, columbian things are subscribed. If the shelton is unfixed and the shelton is subscribed then the shelton is columbian. The shelton does not visit the shelton.", "logic": "\nSubscribed(shelton)\nColumbian(shelton)\nHabitual(shelton)\nUnavowed(shelton)\nUnfixed(shelton)\nforall x (Columbian(x) and Unavowed(x) -> Habitual(x))\nforall x (Habitual(x) and Columbian(x) -> Subscribed(x))\nUnfixed(shelton) and Subscribed(shelton) -> Columbian(shelton)\n\nnot Visits(shelton, shelton)\n\nnot Visits(shelton, shelton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1430"} {"premises": "The danelle is coral. The danelle is stovepiped. The danelle is vital. The danelle is dominating. The danelle is lustrous. All stovepiped, dominating things are vital. Green, stovepiped things are coral. If the danelle is lustrous and the danelle is coral then the danelle is stovepiped. The danelle likes the danelle.", "logic": "\nCoral(danelle)\nStovepiped(danelle)\nVital(danelle)\nDominating(danelle)\nLustrous(danelle)\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) and Dominating(x) -> Vital(x))\nforall x (Vital(x) and Stovepiped(x) -> Coral(x))\nLustrous(danelle) and Coral(danelle) -> Stovepiped(danelle)\n\nLikes(danelle, danelle)\n\nLikes(danelle, danelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1430"} {"premises": "Farley is blame. Farley is riant. Farley is not upstart. Farley is outward. Tricia is riant. Tricia is outward. Mahala is heated. If Tricia is outward and Tricia is blame then Tricia is upstart. If Farley is riant and Farley is heated then Farley is downward. If someone is heated and blame then they are riant. All heated people are downward. If Tricia is heated and Tricia is not outward then Tricia is not downward. All downward people are blame. Farley is blame.", "logic": "\nBlame(farley)\nRiant(farley)\nnot Upstart(farley)\nOutward(farley)\nRiant(tricia)\nOutward(tricia)\nHeated(mahala)\nOutward(tricia) and Blame(tricia) -> Upstart(tricia)\nRiant(farley) and Heated(farley) -> Downward(farley)\nforall x (Heated(x) and Blame(x) -> Riant(x))\nforall x (Heated(x) -> Downward(x))\nHeated(tricia) and not Outward(tricia) -> not Downward(tricia)\nforall x (Downward(x) -> Blame(x))\n\nBlame(farley)\n\ntherefore Blame(farley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Elbert is crustose. Elbert is ageless. Elbert is not damaged. Elbert is dateable. Ania is ageless. Ania is dateable. Johann is collusive. If Ania is dateable and Ania is crustose then Ania is damaged. If Elbert is ageless and Elbert is collusive then Elbert is bacchanal. If someone is collusive and crustose then they are ageless. All collusive people are bacchanal. If Ania is collusive and Ania is not dateable then Ania is not bacchanal. All bacchanal people are crustose. Ania is not ageless.", "logic": "\nCrustose(elbert)\nAgeless(elbert)\nnot Damaged(elbert)\nDateable(elbert)\nAgeless(ania)\nDateable(ania)\nCollusive(johann)\nDateable(ania) and Crustose(ania) -> Damaged(ania)\nAgeless(elbert) and Collusive(elbert) -> Bacchanal(elbert)\nforall x (Collusive(x) and Crustose(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Collusive(x) -> Bacchanal(x))\nCollusive(ania) and not Dateable(ania) -> not Bacchanal(ania)\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Crustose(x))\n\nnot Ageless(ania)\n\ntherefore Ageless(ania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Bryant is spheric. Bryant is trusting. Bryant is not exaugural. Bryant is effortful. Rik is trusting. Rik is effortful. Benson is canonic. If Rik is effortful and Rik is spheric then Rik is exaugural. If Bryant is trusting and Bryant is canonic then Bryant is achromatic. If someone is canonic and spheric then they are trusting. All canonic people are achromatic. If Rik is canonic and Rik is not effortful then Rik is not achromatic. All achromatic people are spheric. Benson is achromatic.", "logic": "\nSpheric(bryant)\nTrusting(bryant)\nnot Exaugural(bryant)\nEffortful(bryant)\nTrusting(rik)\nEffortful(rik)\nCanonic(benson)\nEffortful(rik) and Spheric(rik) -> Exaugural(rik)\nTrusting(bryant) and Canonic(bryant) -> Achromatic(bryant)\nforall x (Canonic(x) and Spheric(x) -> Trusting(x))\nforall x (Canonic(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nCanonic(rik) and not Effortful(rik) -> not Achromatic(rik)\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Spheric(x))\n\nAchromatic(benson)\n\nCanonic(benson) and forall x (Canonic(x) -> Achromatic(x)) -> therefore Achromatic(benson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Elnore is thrilled. Elnore is acherontic. Elnore is not abnormal. Elnore is fashioned. Klara is acherontic. Klara is fashioned. Nancee is controlled. If Klara is fashioned and Klara is thrilled then Klara is abnormal. If Elnore is acherontic and Elnore is controlled then Elnore is coseismic. If someone is controlled and thrilled then they are acherontic. All controlled people are coseismic. If Klara is controlled and Klara is not fashioned then Klara is not coseismic. All coseismic people are thrilled. Nancee is not coseismic.", "logic": "\nThrilled(elnore)\nAcherontic(elnore)\nnot Abnormal(elnore)\nFashioned(elnore)\nAcherontic(klara)\nFashioned(klara)\nControlled(nancee)\nFashioned(klara) and Thrilled(klara) -> Abnormal(klara)\nAcherontic(elnore) and Controlled(elnore) -> Coseismic(elnore)\nforall x (Controlled(x) and Thrilled(x) -> Acherontic(x))\nforall x (Controlled(x) -> Coseismic(x))\nControlled(klara) and not Fashioned(klara) -> not Coseismic(klara)\nforall x (Coseismic(x) -> Thrilled(x))\n\nnot Coseismic(nancee)\n\nControlled(nancee) and forall x (Controlled(x) -> Coseismic(x)) -> therefore Coseismic(nancee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Zia is rearward. Zia is continuing. Zia is not probable. Zia is enviable. Siffre is continuing. Siffre is enviable. Neel is unthematic. If Siffre is enviable and Siffre is rearward then Siffre is probable. If Zia is continuing and Zia is unthematic then Zia is inhibitory. If someone is unthematic and rearward then they are continuing. All unthematic people are inhibitory. If Siffre is unthematic and Siffre is not enviable then Siffre is not inhibitory. All inhibitory people are rearward. Neel is rearward.", "logic": "\nRearward(zia)\nContinuing(zia)\nnot Probable(zia)\nEnviable(zia)\nContinuing(siffre)\nEnviable(siffre)\nUnthematic(neel)\nEnviable(siffre) and Rearward(siffre) -> Probable(siffre)\nContinuing(zia) and Unthematic(zia) -> Inhibitory(zia)\nforall x (Unthematic(x) and Rearward(x) -> Continuing(x))\nforall x (Unthematic(x) -> Inhibitory(x))\nUnthematic(siffre) and not Enviable(siffre) -> not Inhibitory(siffre)\nforall x (Inhibitory(x) -> Rearward(x))\n\nRearward(neel)\n\nUnthematic(neel) and forall x (Unthematic(x) -> Inhibitory(x)) -> therefore Inhibitory(neel) Inhibitory(neel) and forall x (Inhibitory(x) -> Rearward(x)) -> therefore Rearward(neel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Minny is remittent. Minny is expendable. Minny is not select. Minny is peremptory. Elmore is expendable. Elmore is peremptory. Abbey is crannied. If Elmore is peremptory and Elmore is remittent then Elmore is select. If Minny is expendable and Minny is crannied then Minny is glooming. If someone is crannied and remittent then they are expendable. All crannied people are glooming. If Elmore is crannied and Elmore is not peremptory then Elmore is not glooming. All glooming people are remittent. Abbey is not remittent.", "logic": "\nRemittent(minny)\nExpendable(minny)\nnot Select(minny)\nPeremptory(minny)\nExpendable(elmore)\nPeremptory(elmore)\nCrannied(abbey)\nPeremptory(elmore) and Remittent(elmore) -> Select(elmore)\nExpendable(minny) and Crannied(minny) -> Glooming(minny)\nforall x (Crannied(x) and Remittent(x) -> Expendable(x))\nforall x (Crannied(x) -> Glooming(x))\nCrannied(elmore) and not Peremptory(elmore) -> not Glooming(elmore)\nforall x (Glooming(x) -> Remittent(x))\n\nnot Remittent(abbey)\n\nCrannied(abbey) and forall x (Crannied(x) -> Glooming(x)) -> therefore Glooming(abbey) Glooming(abbey) and forall x (Glooming(x) -> Remittent(x)) -> therefore Remittent(abbey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Nevile is mortal. Nevile is anopheline. Nevile is not apophyseal. Nevile is ridged. Merrili is anopheline. Merrili is ridged. Ransom is according. If Merrili is ridged and Merrili is mortal then Merrili is apophyseal. If Nevile is anopheline and Nevile is according then Nevile is speedy. If someone is according and mortal then they are anopheline. All according people are speedy. If Merrili is according and Merrili is not ridged then Merrili is not speedy. All speedy people are mortal. Ransom is anopheline.", "logic": "\nMortal(nevile)\nAnopheline(nevile)\nnot Apophyseal(nevile)\nRidged(nevile)\nAnopheline(merrili)\nRidged(merrili)\nAccording(ransom)\nRidged(merrili) and Mortal(merrili) -> Apophyseal(merrili)\nAnopheline(nevile) and According(nevile) -> Speedy(nevile)\nforall x (According(x) and Mortal(x) -> Anopheline(x))\nforall x (According(x) -> Speedy(x))\nAccording(merrili) and not Ridged(merrili) -> not Speedy(merrili)\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Mortal(x))\n\nAnopheline(ransom)\n\nAccording(ransom) and forall x (According(x) -> Speedy(x)) -> therefore Speedy(ransom) Speedy(ransom) and forall x (Speedy(x) -> Mortal(x)) -> therefore Mortal(ransom) According(ransom) and Mortal(ransom) and forall x (According(x) and Mortal(x) -> Anopheline(x)) -> therefore Anopheline(ransom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Minda is orthogonal. Minda is pretty. Minda is not acquitted. Minda is basiscopic. Lydie is pretty. Lydie is basiscopic. Deena is duncical. If Lydie is basiscopic and Lydie is orthogonal then Lydie is acquitted. If Minda is pretty and Minda is duncical then Minda is activated. If someone is duncical and orthogonal then they are pretty. All duncical people are activated. If Lydie is duncical and Lydie is not basiscopic then Lydie is not activated. All activated people are orthogonal. Deena is not pretty.", "logic": "\nOrthogonal(minda)\nPretty(minda)\nnot Acquitted(minda)\nBasiscopic(minda)\nPretty(lydie)\nBasiscopic(lydie)\nDuncical(deena)\nBasiscopic(lydie) and Orthogonal(lydie) -> Acquitted(lydie)\nPretty(minda) and Duncical(minda) -> Activated(minda)\nforall x (Duncical(x) and Orthogonal(x) -> Pretty(x))\nforall x (Duncical(x) -> Activated(x))\nDuncical(lydie) and not Basiscopic(lydie) -> not Activated(lydie)\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Orthogonal(x))\n\nnot Pretty(deena)\n\nDuncical(deena) and forall x (Duncical(x) -> Activated(x)) -> therefore Activated(deena) Activated(deena) and forall x (Activated(x) -> Orthogonal(x)) -> therefore Orthogonal(deena) Duncical(deena) and Orthogonal(deena) and forall x (Duncical(x) and Orthogonal(x) -> Pretty(x)) -> therefore Pretty(deena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Farra is pursuing. Farra is copular. Farra is not quadruplex. Farra is disclike. Vivienne is copular. Vivienne is disclike. Sydel is screaming. If Vivienne is disclike and Vivienne is pursuing then Vivienne is quadruplex. If Farra is copular and Farra is screaming then Farra is moribund. If someone is screaming and pursuing then they are copular. All screaming people are moribund. If Vivienne is screaming and Vivienne is not disclike then Vivienne is not moribund. All moribund people are pursuing. Vivienne is not moribund.", "logic": "\nPursuing(farra)\nCopular(farra)\nnot Quadruplex(farra)\nDisclike(farra)\nCopular(vivienne)\nDisclike(vivienne)\nScreaming(sydel)\nDisclike(vivienne) and Pursuing(vivienne) -> Quadruplex(vivienne)\nCopular(farra) and Screaming(farra) -> Moribund(farra)\nforall x (Screaming(x) and Pursuing(x) -> Copular(x))\nforall x (Screaming(x) -> Moribund(x))\nScreaming(vivienne) and not Disclike(vivienne) -> not Moribund(vivienne)\nforall x (Moribund(x) -> Pursuing(x))\n\nnot Moribund(vivienne)\n\nforall x (Screaming(x) -> Moribund(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Rowe is uneasy. Rowe is hemolytic. Rowe is not tearing. Rowe is compliant. Phedra is hemolytic. Phedra is compliant. Paco is amative. If Phedra is compliant and Phedra is uneasy then Phedra is tearing. If Rowe is hemolytic and Rowe is amative then Rowe is unsatiable. If someone is amative and uneasy then they are hemolytic. All amative people are unsatiable. If Phedra is amative and Phedra is not compliant then Phedra is not unsatiable. All unsatiable people are uneasy. Phedra is uneasy.", "logic": "\nUneasy(rowe)\nHemolytic(rowe)\nnot Tearing(rowe)\nCompliant(rowe)\nHemolytic(phedra)\nCompliant(phedra)\nAmative(paco)\nCompliant(phedra) and Uneasy(phedra) -> Tearing(phedra)\nHemolytic(rowe) and Amative(rowe) -> Unsatiable(rowe)\nforall x (Amative(x) and Uneasy(x) -> Hemolytic(x))\nforall x (Amative(x) -> Unsatiable(x))\nAmative(phedra) and not Compliant(phedra) -> not Unsatiable(phedra)\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) -> Uneasy(x))\n\nUneasy(phedra)\n\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) -> Uneasy(x)) <- forall x (Amative(x) -> Unsatiable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Niles is flemish. Niles is derisive. Niles is not pedigree. Niles is awash. Grant is derisive. Grant is awash. Rayner is cussed. If Grant is awash and Grant is flemish then Grant is pedigree. If Niles is derisive and Niles is cussed then Niles is foregone. If someone is cussed and flemish then they are derisive. All cussed people are foregone. If Grant is cussed and Grant is not awash then Grant is not foregone. All foregone people are flemish. Grant is not pedigree.", "logic": "\nFlemish(niles)\nDerisive(niles)\nnot Pedigree(niles)\nAwash(niles)\nDerisive(grant)\nAwash(grant)\nCussed(rayner)\nAwash(grant) and Flemish(grant) -> Pedigree(grant)\nDerisive(niles) and Cussed(niles) -> Foregone(niles)\nforall x (Cussed(x) and Flemish(x) -> Derisive(x))\nforall x (Cussed(x) -> Foregone(x))\nCussed(grant) and not Awash(grant) -> not Foregone(grant)\nforall x (Foregone(x) -> Flemish(x))\n\nnot Pedigree(grant)\n\nAwash(grant) and Flemish(grant) -> Pedigree(grant) <- forall x (Foregone(x) -> Flemish(x)) <- forall x (Cussed(x) -> Foregone(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Jerrylee is unsightly. Jerrylee is intangible. Jerrylee is not unadvised. Jerrylee is crosswise. Chevalier is intangible. Chevalier is crosswise. Kameko is unredeemed. If Chevalier is crosswise and Chevalier is unsightly then Chevalier is unadvised. If Jerrylee is intangible and Jerrylee is unredeemed then Jerrylee is inbred. If someone is unredeemed and unsightly then they are intangible. All unredeemed people are inbred. If Chevalier is unredeemed and Chevalier is not crosswise then Chevalier is not inbred. All inbred people are unsightly. Jerrylee is inbred.", "logic": "\nUnsightly(jerrylee)\nIntangible(jerrylee)\nnot Unadvised(jerrylee)\nCrosswise(jerrylee)\nIntangible(chevalier)\nCrosswise(chevalier)\nUnredeemed(kameko)\nCrosswise(chevalier) and Unsightly(chevalier) -> Unadvised(chevalier)\nIntangible(jerrylee) and Unredeemed(jerrylee) -> Inbred(jerrylee)\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) and Unsightly(x) -> Intangible(x))\nforall x (Unredeemed(x) -> Inbred(x))\nUnredeemed(chevalier) and not Crosswise(chevalier) -> not Inbred(chevalier)\nforall x (Inbred(x) -> Unsightly(x))\n\nInbred(jerrylee)\n\nIntangible(jerrylee) and Unredeemed(jerrylee) -> Inbred(jerrylee) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Purcell is sumatran. Purcell is unreduced. Purcell is not undrawn. Purcell is forked. Sophie is unreduced. Sophie is forked. Virgilio is modern. If Sophie is forked and Sophie is sumatran then Sophie is undrawn. If Purcell is unreduced and Purcell is modern then Purcell is shuttered. If someone is modern and sumatran then they are unreduced. All modern people are shuttered. If Sophie is modern and Sophie is not forked then Sophie is not shuttered. All shuttered people are sumatran. Purcell is not red.", "logic": "\nSumatran(purcell)\nUnreduced(purcell)\nnot Undrawn(purcell)\nForked(purcell)\nUnreduced(sophie)\nForked(sophie)\nModern(virgilio)\nForked(sophie) and Sumatran(sophie) -> Undrawn(sophie)\nUnreduced(purcell) and Modern(purcell) -> Shuttered(purcell)\nforall x (Modern(x) and Sumatran(x) -> Unreduced(x))\nforall x (Modern(x) -> Shuttered(x))\nModern(sophie) and not Forked(sophie) -> not Shuttered(sophie)\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Sumatran(x))\n\nnot Red(purcell)\n\nnot Red(purcell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Cassandra is traveled. Cassandra is stuck. Cassandra is not upstart. Cassandra is yellowish. Sammy is stuck. Sammy is yellowish. Junia is southmost. If Sammy is yellowish and Sammy is traveled then Sammy is upstart. If Cassandra is stuck and Cassandra is southmost then Cassandra is insurgent. If someone is southmost and traveled then they are stuck. All southmost people are insurgent. If Sammy is southmost and Sammy is not yellowish then Sammy is not insurgent. All insurgent people are traveled. Junia is red.", "logic": "\nTraveled(cassandra)\nStuck(cassandra)\nnot Upstart(cassandra)\nYellowish(cassandra)\nStuck(sammy)\nYellowish(sammy)\nSouthmost(junia)\nYellowish(sammy) and Traveled(sammy) -> Upstart(sammy)\nStuck(cassandra) and Southmost(cassandra) -> Insurgent(cassandra)\nforall x (Southmost(x) and Traveled(x) -> Stuck(x))\nforall x (Southmost(x) -> Insurgent(x))\nSouthmost(sammy) and not Yellowish(sammy) -> not Insurgent(sammy)\nforall x (Insurgent(x) -> Traveled(x))\n\nRed(junia)\n\nRed(junia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Coral is catabatic. Coral is categoric. Coral is not tyrannic. Coral is dandyish. Indira is categoric. Indira is dandyish. Bianca is fallow. If Indira is dandyish and Indira is catabatic then Indira is tyrannic. If Coral is categoric and Coral is fallow then Coral is pleonastic. If someone is fallow and catabatic then they are categoric. All fallow people are pleonastic. If Indira is fallow and Indira is not dandyish then Indira is not pleonastic. All pleonastic people are catabatic. Bianca is not tyrannic.", "logic": "\nCatabatic(coral)\nCategoric(coral)\nnot Tyrannic(coral)\nDandyish(coral)\nCategoric(indira)\nDandyish(indira)\nFallow(bianca)\nDandyish(indira) and Catabatic(indira) -> Tyrannic(indira)\nCategoric(coral) and Fallow(coral) -> Pleonastic(coral)\nforall x (Fallow(x) and Catabatic(x) -> Categoric(x))\nforall x (Fallow(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nFallow(indira) and not Dandyish(indira) -> not Pleonastic(indira)\nforall x (Pleonastic(x) -> Catabatic(x))\n\nnot Tyrannic(bianca)\n\nnot Tyrannic(bianca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "Johnna is adjustable. Johnna is bloodshot. Johnna is not grassy. Johnna is mucoid. Heddi is bloodshot. Heddi is mucoid. Taddeus is meshugga. If Heddi is mucoid and Heddi is adjustable then Heddi is grassy. If Johnna is bloodshot and Johnna is meshugga then Johnna is virtuous. If someone is meshugga and adjustable then they are bloodshot. All meshugga people are virtuous. If Heddi is meshugga and Heddi is not mucoid then Heddi is not virtuous. All virtuous people are adjustable. Johnna is meshugga.", "logic": "\nAdjustable(johnna)\nBloodshot(johnna)\nnot Grassy(johnna)\nMucoid(johnna)\nBloodshot(heddi)\nMucoid(heddi)\nMeshugga(taddeus)\nMucoid(heddi) and Adjustable(heddi) -> Grassy(heddi)\nBloodshot(johnna) and Meshugga(johnna) -> Virtuous(johnna)\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Adjustable(x) -> Bloodshot(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) -> Virtuous(x))\nMeshugga(heddi) and not Mucoid(heddi) -> not Virtuous(heddi)\nforall x (Virtuous(x) -> Adjustable(x))\n\nMeshugga(johnna)\n\nMeshugga(johnna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1533"} {"premises": "The taber excrete the aileen. The taber does not visit the edwin. The edwin flicker the aileen. The edwin is not anemic. The edwin is critical. The edwin excrete the aileen. The stavros is flashy. The stavros is critical. The stavros does not like the taber. The stavros does not like the aileen. The aileen is not flashy. The aileen excrete the taber. If someone flicker the taber and the taber excrete the stavros then they do not eat the stavros. All lxviii people are anemic. If someone excrete the taber and the taber is not flashy then they do not like the stavros. If someone disquiet the taber then they like the stavros. If someone excrete the stavros then the stavros is not anemic. If someone flicker the edwin and the edwin excrete the aileen then the aileen excrete the stavros. If someone excrete the taber and the taber excrete the aileen then the taber flicker the edwin. If someone excrete the taber then the taber does not eat the stavros. The taber does not visit the edwin.", "logic": "\nExcrete(taber, aileen)\nnot Disquiet(taber, edwin)\nFlicker(edwin, aileen)\nnot Anemic(edwin)\nCritical(edwin)\nExcrete(edwin, aileen)\nFlashy(stavros)\nCritical(stavros)\nnot Excrete(stavros, taber)\nnot Excrete(stavros, aileen)\nnot Flashy(aileen)\nExcrete(aileen, taber)\nforall x (Flicker(x, taber) and Excrete(taber, stavros) -> not Flicker(x, stavros))\nforall x (Lxviii(x) -> Anemic(x))\nforall x (Excrete(x, taber) and not Flashy(taber) -> not Excrete(x, stavros))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, taber) -> Excrete(x, stavros))\nforall x (Excrete(x, stavros) -> not Anemic(stavros))\nforall x (Flicker(x, edwin) and Excrete(edwin, aileen) -> Excrete(aileen, stavros))\nforall x (Excrete(x, taber) and Excrete(taber, aileen) -> Flicker(taber, edwin))\nforall x (Excrete(x, taber) -> not Flicker(taber, stavros))\n\nnot Disquiet(taber, edwin)\n\ntherefore not Disquiet(taber, edwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The nicola deduct the randene. The nicola does not visit the solomon. The solomon discase the randene. The solomon is not delphian. The solomon is feline. The solomon deduct the randene. The sella is hebrew. The sella is feline. The sella does not like the nicola. The sella does not like the randene. The randene is not hebrew. The randene deduct the nicola. If someone discase the nicola and the nicola deduct the sella then they do not eat the sella. All ruritanian people are delphian. If someone deduct the nicola and the nicola is not hebrew then they do not like the sella. If someone wake the nicola then they like the sella. If someone deduct the sella then the sella is not delphian. If someone discase the solomon and the solomon deduct the randene then the randene deduct the sella. If someone deduct the nicola and the nicola deduct the randene then the nicola discase the solomon. If someone deduct the nicola then the nicola does not eat the sella. The solomon does not eat the randene.", "logic": "\nDeduct(nicola, randene)\nnot Wake(nicola, solomon)\nDiscase(solomon, randene)\nnot Delphian(solomon)\nFeline(solomon)\nDeduct(solomon, randene)\nHebrew(sella)\nFeline(sella)\nnot Deduct(sella, nicola)\nnot Deduct(sella, randene)\nnot Hebrew(randene)\nDeduct(randene, nicola)\nforall x (Discase(x, nicola) and Deduct(nicola, sella) -> not Discase(x, sella))\nforall x (Ruritanian(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Deduct(x, nicola) and not Hebrew(nicola) -> not Deduct(x, sella))\nforall x (Wake(x, nicola) -> Deduct(x, sella))\nforall x (Deduct(x, sella) -> not Delphian(sella))\nforall x (Discase(x, solomon) and Deduct(solomon, randene) -> Deduct(randene, sella))\nforall x (Deduct(x, nicola) and Deduct(nicola, randene) -> Discase(nicola, solomon))\nforall x (Deduct(x, nicola) -> not Discase(nicola, sella))\n\nnot Discase(solomon, randene)\n\ntherefore Discase(solomon, randene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The joycelin miss the jeromy. The joycelin does not visit the sherlock. The sherlock wisecrack the jeromy. The sherlock is not magnetic. The sherlock is tubal. The sherlock miss the jeromy. The jameson is systolic. The jameson is tubal. The jameson does not like the joycelin. The jameson does not like the jeromy. The jeromy is not systolic. The jeromy miss the joycelin. If someone wisecrack the joycelin and the joycelin miss the jameson then they do not eat the jameson. All unassigned people are magnetic. If someone miss the joycelin and the joycelin is not systolic then they do not like the jameson. If someone canvass the joycelin then they like the jameson. If someone miss the jameson then the jameson is not magnetic. If someone wisecrack the sherlock and the sherlock miss the jeromy then the jeromy miss the jameson. If someone miss the joycelin and the joycelin miss the jeromy then the joycelin wisecrack the sherlock. If someone miss the joycelin then the joycelin does not eat the jameson. The joycelin wisecrack the sherlock.", "logic": "\nMiss(joycelin, jeromy)\nnot Canvass(joycelin, sherlock)\nWisecrack(sherlock, jeromy)\nnot Magnetic(sherlock)\nTubal(sherlock)\nMiss(sherlock, jeromy)\nSystolic(jameson)\nTubal(jameson)\nnot Miss(jameson, joycelin)\nnot Miss(jameson, jeromy)\nnot Systolic(jeromy)\nMiss(jeromy, joycelin)\nforall x (Wisecrack(x, joycelin) and Miss(joycelin, jameson) -> not Wisecrack(x, jameson))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> Magnetic(x))\nforall x (Miss(x, joycelin) and not Systolic(joycelin) -> not Miss(x, jameson))\nforall x (Canvass(x, joycelin) -> Miss(x, jameson))\nforall x (Miss(x, jameson) -> not Magnetic(jameson))\nforall x (Wisecrack(x, sherlock) and Miss(sherlock, jeromy) -> Miss(jeromy, jameson))\nforall x (Miss(x, joycelin) and Miss(joycelin, jeromy) -> Wisecrack(joycelin, sherlock))\nforall x (Miss(x, joycelin) -> not Wisecrack(joycelin, jameson))\n\nWisecrack(joycelin, sherlock)\n\nMiss(jeromy, joycelin) and Miss(joycelin, jeromy) and forall x (Miss(x, joycelin) and Miss(joycelin, jeromy) -> Wisecrack(joycelin, sherlock)) -> therefore Wisecrack(joycelin, sherlock)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The moyna suffuse the yvette. The moyna does not visit the gil. The gil bifurcate the yvette. The gil is not prejudiced. The gil is laboring. The gil suffuse the yvette. The madeleine is wireless. The madeleine is laboring. The madeleine does not like the moyna. The madeleine does not like the yvette. The yvette is not wireless. The yvette suffuse the moyna. If someone bifurcate the moyna and the moyna suffuse the madeleine then they do not eat the madeleine. All lettered people are prejudiced. If someone suffuse the moyna and the moyna is not wireless then they do not like the madeleine. If someone coal the moyna then they like the madeleine. If someone suffuse the madeleine then the madeleine is not prejudiced. If someone bifurcate the gil and the gil suffuse the yvette then the yvette suffuse the madeleine. If someone suffuse the moyna and the moyna suffuse the yvette then the moyna bifurcate the gil. If someone suffuse the moyna then the moyna does not eat the madeleine. The moyna does not eat the gil.", "logic": "\nSuffuse(moyna, yvette)\nnot Coal(moyna, gil)\nBifurcate(gil, yvette)\nnot Prejudiced(gil)\nLaboring(gil)\nSuffuse(gil, yvette)\nWireless(madeleine)\nLaboring(madeleine)\nnot Suffuse(madeleine, moyna)\nnot Suffuse(madeleine, yvette)\nnot Wireless(yvette)\nSuffuse(yvette, moyna)\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, moyna) and Suffuse(moyna, madeleine) -> not Bifurcate(x, madeleine))\nforall x (Lettered(x) -> Prejudiced(x))\nforall x (Suffuse(x, moyna) and not Wireless(moyna) -> not Suffuse(x, madeleine))\nforall x (Coal(x, moyna) -> Suffuse(x, madeleine))\nforall x (Suffuse(x, madeleine) -> not Prejudiced(madeleine))\nforall x (Bifurcate(x, gil) and Suffuse(gil, yvette) -> Suffuse(yvette, madeleine))\nforall x (Suffuse(x, moyna) and Suffuse(moyna, yvette) -> Bifurcate(moyna, gil))\nforall x (Suffuse(x, moyna) -> not Bifurcate(moyna, madeleine))\n\nnot Bifurcate(moyna, gil)\n\nSuffuse(yvette, moyna) and Suffuse(moyna, yvette) and forall x (Suffuse(x, moyna) and Suffuse(moyna, yvette) -> Bifurcate(moyna, gil)) -> therefore Bifurcate(moyna, gil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The elsinore compere the marcelia. The elsinore does not visit the herb. The herb acidify the marcelia. The herb is not swarthy. The herb is bouldered. The herb compere the marcelia. The juliane is metameric. The juliane is bouldered. The juliane does not like the elsinore. The juliane does not like the marcelia. The marcelia is not metameric. The marcelia compere the elsinore. If someone acidify the elsinore and the elsinore compere the juliane then they do not eat the juliane. All monovular people are swarthy. If someone compere the elsinore and the elsinore is not metameric then they do not like the juliane. If someone overcharge the elsinore then they like the juliane. If someone compere the juliane then the juliane is not swarthy. If someone acidify the herb and the herb compere the marcelia then the marcelia compere the juliane. If someone compere the elsinore and the elsinore compere the marcelia then the elsinore acidify the herb. If someone compere the elsinore then the elsinore does not eat the juliane. The marcelia compere the juliane.", "logic": "\nCompere(elsinore, marcelia)\nnot Overcharge(elsinore, herb)\nAcidify(herb, marcelia)\nnot Swarthy(herb)\nBouldered(herb)\nCompere(herb, marcelia)\nMetameric(juliane)\nBouldered(juliane)\nnot Compere(juliane, elsinore)\nnot Compere(juliane, marcelia)\nnot Metameric(marcelia)\nCompere(marcelia, elsinore)\nforall x (Acidify(x, elsinore) and Compere(elsinore, juliane) -> not Acidify(x, juliane))\nforall x (Monovular(x) -> Swarthy(x))\nforall x (Compere(x, elsinore) and not Metameric(elsinore) -> not Compere(x, juliane))\nforall x (Overcharge(x, elsinore) -> Compere(x, juliane))\nforall x (Compere(x, juliane) -> not Swarthy(juliane))\nforall x (Acidify(x, herb) and Compere(herb, marcelia) -> Compere(marcelia, juliane))\nforall x (Compere(x, elsinore) and Compere(elsinore, marcelia) -> Acidify(elsinore, herb))\nforall x (Compere(x, elsinore) -> not Acidify(elsinore, juliane))\n\nCompere(marcelia, juliane)\n\nCompere(marcelia, elsinore) and Compere(elsinore, marcelia) and forall x (Compere(x, elsinore) and Compere(elsinore, marcelia) -> Acidify(elsinore, herb)) -> therefore Acidify(elsinore, herb) Acidify(elsinore, herb) and Compere(herb, marcelia) and forall x (Acidify(x, herb) and Compere(herb, marcelia) -> Compere(marcelia, juliane)) -> therefore Compere(marcelia, juliane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The verne expatriate the eugine. The verne does not visit the eugenie. The eugenie generate the eugine. The eugenie is not zillion. The eugenie is homosexual. The eugenie expatriate the eugine. The tyrone is salacious. The tyrone is homosexual. The tyrone does not like the verne. The tyrone does not like the eugine. The eugine is not salacious. The eugine expatriate the verne. If someone generate the verne and the verne expatriate the tyrone then they do not eat the tyrone. All analogous people are zillion. If someone expatriate the verne and the verne is not salacious then they do not like the tyrone. If someone demise the verne then they like the tyrone. If someone expatriate the tyrone then the tyrone is not zillion. If someone generate the eugenie and the eugenie expatriate the eugine then the eugine expatriate the tyrone. If someone expatriate the verne and the verne expatriate the eugine then the verne generate the eugenie. If someone expatriate the verne then the verne does not eat the tyrone. The eugine does not like the tyrone.", "logic": "\nExpatriate(verne, eugine)\nnot Demise(verne, eugenie)\nGenerate(eugenie, eugine)\nnot Zillion(eugenie)\nHomosexual(eugenie)\nExpatriate(eugenie, eugine)\nSalacious(tyrone)\nHomosexual(tyrone)\nnot Expatriate(tyrone, verne)\nnot Expatriate(tyrone, eugine)\nnot Salacious(eugine)\nExpatriate(eugine, verne)\nforall x (Generate(x, verne) and Expatriate(verne, tyrone) -> not Generate(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Analogous(x) -> Zillion(x))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, verne) and not Salacious(verne) -> not Expatriate(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Demise(x, verne) -> Expatriate(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, tyrone) -> not Zillion(tyrone))\nforall x (Generate(x, eugenie) and Expatriate(eugenie, eugine) -> Expatriate(eugine, tyrone))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, verne) and Expatriate(verne, eugine) -> Generate(verne, eugenie))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, verne) -> not Generate(verne, tyrone))\n\nnot Expatriate(eugine, tyrone)\n\nExpatriate(eugine, verne) and Expatriate(verne, eugine) and forall x (Expatriate(x, verne) and Expatriate(verne, eugine) -> Generate(verne, eugenie)) -> therefore Generate(verne, eugenie) Generate(verne, eugenie) and Expatriate(eugenie, eugine) and forall x (Generate(x, eugenie) and Expatriate(eugenie, eugine) -> Expatriate(eugine, tyrone)) -> therefore Expatriate(eugine, tyrone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The morena hybridise the calli. The morena does not visit the mellissa. The mellissa estimate the calli. The mellissa is not unafraid. The mellissa is unnerved. The mellissa hybridise the calli. The ralph is untimbered. The ralph is unnerved. The ralph does not like the morena. The ralph does not like the calli. The calli is not untimbered. The calli hybridise the morena. If someone estimate the morena and the morena hybridise the ralph then they do not eat the ralph. All biological people are unafraid. If someone hybridise the morena and the morena is not untimbered then they do not like the ralph. If someone quicken the morena then they like the ralph. If someone hybridise the ralph then the ralph is not unafraid. If someone estimate the mellissa and the mellissa hybridise the calli then the calli hybridise the ralph. If someone hybridise the morena and the morena hybridise the calli then the morena estimate the mellissa. If someone hybridise the morena then the morena does not eat the ralph. The ralph is not unafraid.", "logic": "\nHybridise(morena, calli)\nnot Quicken(morena, mellissa)\nEstimate(mellissa, calli)\nnot Unafraid(mellissa)\nUnnerved(mellissa)\nHybridise(mellissa, calli)\nUntimbered(ralph)\nUnnerved(ralph)\nnot Hybridise(ralph, morena)\nnot Hybridise(ralph, calli)\nnot Untimbered(calli)\nHybridise(calli, morena)\nforall x (Estimate(x, morena) and Hybridise(morena, ralph) -> not Estimate(x, ralph))\nforall x (Biological(x) -> Unafraid(x))\nforall x (Hybridise(x, morena) and not Untimbered(morena) -> not Hybridise(x, ralph))\nforall x (Quicken(x, morena) -> Hybridise(x, ralph))\nforall x (Hybridise(x, ralph) -> not Unafraid(ralph))\nforall x (Estimate(x, mellissa) and Hybridise(mellissa, calli) -> Hybridise(calli, ralph))\nforall x (Hybridise(x, morena) and Hybridise(morena, calli) -> Estimate(morena, mellissa))\nforall x (Hybridise(x, morena) -> not Estimate(morena, ralph))\n\nnot Unafraid(ralph)\n\nHybridise(calli, morena) and Hybridise(morena, calli) and forall x (Hybridise(x, morena) and Hybridise(morena, calli) -> Estimate(morena, mellissa)) -> therefore Estimate(morena, mellissa) Estimate(morena, mellissa) and Hybridise(mellissa, calli) and forall x (Estimate(x, mellissa) and Hybridise(mellissa, calli) -> Hybridise(calli, ralph)) -> therefore Hybridise(calli, ralph) Hybridise(calli, ralph) and forall x (Hybridise(x, ralph) -> not Unafraid(ralph)) -> therefore not Unafraid(ralph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The scarlett goldplate the anthe. The scarlett does not visit the rowland. The rowland endure the anthe. The rowland is not mitigative. The rowland is colossal. The rowland goldplate the anthe. The rebeka is assuring. The rebeka is colossal. The rebeka does not like the scarlett. The rebeka does not like the anthe. The anthe is not assuring. The anthe goldplate the scarlett. If someone endure the scarlett and the scarlett goldplate the rebeka then they do not eat the rebeka. All phrasal people are mitigative. If someone goldplate the scarlett and the scarlett is not assuring then they do not like the rebeka. If someone pith the scarlett then they like the rebeka. If someone goldplate the rebeka then the rebeka is not mitigative. If someone endure the rowland and the rowland goldplate the anthe then the anthe goldplate the rebeka. If someone goldplate the scarlett and the scarlett goldplate the anthe then the scarlett endure the rowland. If someone goldplate the scarlett then the scarlett does not eat the rebeka. The rebeka is mitigative.", "logic": "\nGoldplate(scarlett, anthe)\nnot Pith(scarlett, rowland)\nEndure(rowland, anthe)\nnot Mitigative(rowland)\nColossal(rowland)\nGoldplate(rowland, anthe)\nAssuring(rebeka)\nColossal(rebeka)\nnot Goldplate(rebeka, scarlett)\nnot Goldplate(rebeka, anthe)\nnot Assuring(anthe)\nGoldplate(anthe, scarlett)\nforall x (Endure(x, scarlett) and Goldplate(scarlett, rebeka) -> not Endure(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Phrasal(x) -> Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Goldplate(x, scarlett) and not Assuring(scarlett) -> not Goldplate(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Pith(x, scarlett) -> Goldplate(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Goldplate(x, rebeka) -> not Mitigative(rebeka))\nforall x (Endure(x, rowland) and Goldplate(rowland, anthe) -> Goldplate(anthe, rebeka))\nforall x (Goldplate(x, scarlett) and Goldplate(scarlett, anthe) -> Endure(scarlett, rowland))\nforall x (Goldplate(x, scarlett) -> not Endure(scarlett, rebeka))\n\nMitigative(rebeka)\n\nGoldplate(anthe, scarlett) and Goldplate(scarlett, anthe) and forall x (Goldplate(x, scarlett) and Goldplate(scarlett, anthe) -> Endure(scarlett, rowland)) -> therefore Endure(scarlett, rowland) Endure(scarlett, rowland) and Goldplate(rowland, anthe) and forall x (Endure(x, rowland) and Goldplate(rowland, anthe) -> Goldplate(anthe, rebeka)) -> therefore Goldplate(anthe, rebeka) Goldplate(anthe, rebeka) and forall x (Goldplate(x, rebeka) -> not Mitigative(rebeka)) -> therefore not Mitigative(rebeka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The conchita verge the lacie. The conchita does not visit the doria. The doria unlax the lacie. The doria is not undatable. The doria is bestial. The doria verge the lacie. The dale is thousandth. The dale is bestial. The dale does not like the conchita. The dale does not like the lacie. The lacie is not thousandth. The lacie verge the conchita. If someone unlax the conchita and the conchita verge the dale then they do not eat the dale. All similar people are undatable. If someone verge the conchita and the conchita is not thousandth then they do not like the dale. If someone mumble the conchita then they like the dale. If someone verge the dale then the dale is not undatable. If someone unlax the doria and the doria verge the lacie then the lacie verge the dale. If someone verge the conchita and the conchita verge the lacie then the conchita unlax the doria. If someone verge the conchita then the conchita does not eat the dale. The conchita does not like the dale.", "logic": "\nVerge(conchita, lacie)\nnot Mumble(conchita, doria)\nUnlax(doria, lacie)\nnot Undatable(doria)\nBestial(doria)\nVerge(doria, lacie)\nThousandth(dale)\nBestial(dale)\nnot Verge(dale, conchita)\nnot Verge(dale, lacie)\nnot Thousandth(lacie)\nVerge(lacie, conchita)\nforall x (Unlax(x, conchita) and Verge(conchita, dale) -> not Unlax(x, dale))\nforall x (Similar(x) -> Undatable(x))\nforall x (Verge(x, conchita) and not Thousandth(conchita) -> not Verge(x, dale))\nforall x (Mumble(x, conchita) -> Verge(x, dale))\nforall x (Verge(x, dale) -> not Undatable(dale))\nforall x (Unlax(x, doria) and Verge(doria, lacie) -> Verge(lacie, dale))\nforall x (Verge(x, conchita) and Verge(conchita, lacie) -> Unlax(conchita, doria))\nforall x (Verge(x, conchita) -> not Unlax(conchita, dale))\n\nnot Verge(conchita, dale)\n\nforall x (Mumble(x, conchita) -> Verge(x, dale)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The frederick corn the cobby. The frederick does not visit the frans. The frans victual the cobby. The frans is not ratty. The frans is taken. The frans corn the cobby. The taddeus is unseeable. The taddeus is taken. The taddeus does not like the frederick. The taddeus does not like the cobby. The cobby is not unseeable. The cobby corn the frederick. If someone victual the frederick and the frederick corn the taddeus then they do not eat the taddeus. All attendant people are ratty. If someone corn the frederick and the frederick is not unseeable then they do not like the taddeus. If someone coddle the frederick then they like the taddeus. If someone corn the taddeus then the taddeus is not ratty. If someone victual the frans and the frans corn the cobby then the cobby corn the taddeus. If someone corn the frederick and the frederick corn the cobby then the frederick victual the frans. If someone corn the frederick then the frederick does not eat the taddeus. The frans corn the taddeus.", "logic": "\nCorn(frederick, cobby)\nnot Coddle(frederick, frans)\nVictual(frans, cobby)\nnot Ratty(frans)\nTaken(frans)\nCorn(frans, cobby)\nUnseeable(taddeus)\nTaken(taddeus)\nnot Corn(taddeus, frederick)\nnot Corn(taddeus, cobby)\nnot Unseeable(cobby)\nCorn(cobby, frederick)\nforall x (Victual(x, frederick) and Corn(frederick, taddeus) -> not Victual(x, taddeus))\nforall x (Attendant(x) -> Ratty(x))\nforall x (Corn(x, frederick) and not Unseeable(frederick) -> not Corn(x, taddeus))\nforall x (Coddle(x, frederick) -> Corn(x, taddeus))\nforall x (Corn(x, taddeus) -> not Ratty(taddeus))\nforall x (Victual(x, frans) and Corn(frans, cobby) -> Corn(cobby, taddeus))\nforall x (Corn(x, frederick) and Corn(frederick, cobby) -> Victual(frederick, frans))\nforall x (Corn(x, frederick) -> not Victual(frederick, taddeus))\n\nCorn(frans, taddeus)\n\nforall x (Coddle(x, frederick) -> Corn(x, taddeus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The avie cite the ishmael. The avie does not visit the rianon. The rianon crinkle the ishmael. The rianon is not headstrong. The rianon is denudate. The rianon cite the ishmael. The sullivan is bouffant. The sullivan is denudate. The sullivan does not like the avie. The sullivan does not like the ishmael. The ishmael is not bouffant. The ishmael cite the avie. If someone crinkle the avie and the avie cite the sullivan then they do not eat the sullivan. All edental people are headstrong. If someone cite the avie and the avie is not bouffant then they do not like the sullivan. If someone dislocate the avie then they like the sullivan. If someone cite the sullivan then the sullivan is not headstrong. If someone crinkle the rianon and the rianon cite the ishmael then the ishmael cite the sullivan. If someone cite the avie and the avie cite the ishmael then the avie crinkle the rianon. If someone cite the avie then the avie does not eat the sullivan. The avie is not headstrong.", "logic": "\nCite(avie, ishmael)\nnot Dislocate(avie, rianon)\nCrinkle(rianon, ishmael)\nnot Headstrong(rianon)\nDenudate(rianon)\nCite(rianon, ishmael)\nBouffant(sullivan)\nDenudate(sullivan)\nnot Cite(sullivan, avie)\nnot Cite(sullivan, ishmael)\nnot Bouffant(ishmael)\nCite(ishmael, avie)\nforall x (Crinkle(x, avie) and Cite(avie, sullivan) -> not Crinkle(x, sullivan))\nforall x (Edental(x) -> Headstrong(x))\nforall x (Cite(x, avie) and not Bouffant(avie) -> not Cite(x, sullivan))\nforall x (Dislocate(x, avie) -> Cite(x, sullivan))\nforall x (Cite(x, sullivan) -> not Headstrong(sullivan))\nforall x (Crinkle(x, rianon) and Cite(rianon, ishmael) -> Cite(ishmael, sullivan))\nforall x (Cite(x, avie) and Cite(avie, ishmael) -> Crinkle(avie, rianon))\nforall x (Cite(x, avie) -> not Crinkle(avie, sullivan))\n\nnot Headstrong(avie)\n\nforall x (Edental(x) -> Headstrong(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The herta solarize the rosanna. The herta does not visit the charmane. The charmane fink the rosanna. The charmane is not enlivened. The charmane is theoretic. The charmane solarize the rosanna. The meggy is favourable. The meggy is theoretic. The meggy does not like the herta. The meggy does not like the rosanna. The rosanna is not favourable. The rosanna solarize the herta. If someone fink the herta and the herta solarize the meggy then they do not eat the meggy. All dingy people are enlivened. If someone solarize the herta and the herta is not favourable then they do not like the meggy. If someone nerve the herta then they like the meggy. If someone solarize the meggy then the meggy is not enlivened. If someone fink the charmane and the charmane solarize the rosanna then the rosanna solarize the meggy. If someone solarize the herta and the herta solarize the rosanna then the herta fink the charmane. If someone solarize the herta then the herta does not eat the meggy. The meggy solarize the meggy.", "logic": "\nSolarize(herta, rosanna)\nnot Nerve(herta, charmane)\nFink(charmane, rosanna)\nnot Enlivened(charmane)\nTheoretic(charmane)\nSolarize(charmane, rosanna)\nFavourable(meggy)\nTheoretic(meggy)\nnot Solarize(meggy, herta)\nnot Solarize(meggy, rosanna)\nnot Favourable(rosanna)\nSolarize(rosanna, herta)\nforall x (Fink(x, herta) and Solarize(herta, meggy) -> not Fink(x, meggy))\nforall x (Dingy(x) -> Enlivened(x))\nforall x (Solarize(x, herta) and not Favourable(herta) -> not Solarize(x, meggy))\nforall x (Nerve(x, herta) -> Solarize(x, meggy))\nforall x (Solarize(x, meggy) -> not Enlivened(meggy))\nforall x (Fink(x, charmane) and Solarize(charmane, rosanna) -> Solarize(rosanna, meggy))\nforall x (Solarize(x, herta) and Solarize(herta, rosanna) -> Fink(herta, charmane))\nforall x (Solarize(x, herta) -> not Fink(herta, meggy))\n\nSolarize(meggy, meggy)\n\nforall x (Nerve(x, herta) -> Solarize(x, meggy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The hilda repurchase the glen. The hilda does not visit the robenia. The robenia frustrate the glen. The robenia is not countable. The robenia is cubistic. The robenia repurchase the glen. The aldric is anestric. The aldric is cubistic. The aldric does not like the hilda. The aldric does not like the glen. The glen is not anestric. The glen repurchase the hilda. If someone frustrate the hilda and the hilda repurchase the aldric then they do not eat the aldric. All periodic people are countable. If someone repurchase the hilda and the hilda is not anestric then they do not like the aldric. If someone captivate the hilda then they like the aldric. If someone repurchase the aldric then the aldric is not countable. If someone frustrate the robenia and the robenia repurchase the glen then the glen repurchase the aldric. If someone repurchase the hilda and the hilda repurchase the glen then the hilda frustrate the robenia. If someone repurchase the hilda then the hilda does not eat the aldric. The aldric is not periodic.", "logic": "\nRepurchase(hilda, glen)\nnot Captivate(hilda, robenia)\nFrustrate(robenia, glen)\nnot Countable(robenia)\nCubistic(robenia)\nRepurchase(robenia, glen)\nAnestric(aldric)\nCubistic(aldric)\nnot Repurchase(aldric, hilda)\nnot Repurchase(aldric, glen)\nnot Anestric(glen)\nRepurchase(glen, hilda)\nforall x (Frustrate(x, hilda) and Repurchase(hilda, aldric) -> not Frustrate(x, aldric))\nforall x (Periodic(x) -> Countable(x))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, hilda) and not Anestric(hilda) -> not Repurchase(x, aldric))\nforall x (Captivate(x, hilda) -> Repurchase(x, aldric))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, aldric) -> not Countable(aldric))\nforall x (Frustrate(x, robenia) and Repurchase(robenia, glen) -> Repurchase(glen, aldric))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, hilda) and Repurchase(hilda, glen) -> Frustrate(hilda, robenia))\nforall x (Repurchase(x, hilda) -> not Frustrate(hilda, aldric))\n\nnot Periodic(aldric)\n\nnot Periodic(aldric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The alica insolate the jan. The alica does not visit the gwendolyn. The gwendolyn calender the jan. The gwendolyn is not biaxate. The gwendolyn is brachial. The gwendolyn insolate the jan. The jake is tricksy. The jake is brachial. The jake does not like the alica. The jake does not like the jan. The jan is not tricksy. The jan insolate the alica. If someone calender the alica and the alica insolate the jake then they do not eat the jake. All first people are biaxate. If someone insolate the alica and the alica is not tricksy then they do not like the jake. If someone bubble the alica then they like the jake. If someone insolate the jake then the jake is not biaxate. If someone calender the gwendolyn and the gwendolyn insolate the jan then the jan insolate the jake. If someone insolate the alica and the alica insolate the jan then the alica calender the gwendolyn. If someone insolate the alica then the alica does not eat the jake. The gwendolyn calender the gwendolyn.", "logic": "\nInsolate(alica, jan)\nnot Bubble(alica, gwendolyn)\nCalender(gwendolyn, jan)\nnot Biaxate(gwendolyn)\nBrachial(gwendolyn)\nInsolate(gwendolyn, jan)\nTricksy(jake)\nBrachial(jake)\nnot Insolate(jake, alica)\nnot Insolate(jake, jan)\nnot Tricksy(jan)\nInsolate(jan, alica)\nforall x (Calender(x, alica) and Insolate(alica, jake) -> not Calender(x, jake))\nforall x (First(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Insolate(x, alica) and not Tricksy(alica) -> not Insolate(x, jake))\nforall x (Bubble(x, alica) -> Insolate(x, jake))\nforall x (Insolate(x, jake) -> not Biaxate(jake))\nforall x (Calender(x, gwendolyn) and Insolate(gwendolyn, jan) -> Insolate(jan, jake))\nforall x (Insolate(x, alica) and Insolate(alica, jan) -> Calender(alica, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Insolate(x, alica) -> not Calender(alica, jake))\n\nCalender(gwendolyn, gwendolyn)\n\nCalender(gwendolyn, gwendolyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The elise abet the nathanael. The elise does not visit the stephie. The stephie uprise the nathanael. The stephie is not robed. The stephie is scrimpy. The stephie abet the nathanael. The shelden is effected. The shelden is scrimpy. The shelden does not like the elise. The shelden does not like the nathanael. The nathanael is not effected. The nathanael abet the elise. If someone uprise the elise and the elise abet the shelden then they do not eat the shelden. All dicky people are robed. If someone abet the elise and the elise is not effected then they do not like the shelden. If someone demobilize the elise then they like the shelden. If someone abet the shelden then the shelden is not robed. If someone uprise the stephie and the stephie abet the nathanael then the nathanael abet the shelden. If someone abet the elise and the elise abet the nathanael then the elise uprise the stephie. If someone abet the elise then the elise does not eat the shelden. The shelden is not kind.", "logic": "\nAbet(elise, nathanael)\nnot Demobilize(elise, stephie)\nUprise(stephie, nathanael)\nnot Robed(stephie)\nScrimpy(stephie)\nAbet(stephie, nathanael)\nEffected(shelden)\nScrimpy(shelden)\nnot Abet(shelden, elise)\nnot Abet(shelden, nathanael)\nnot Effected(nathanael)\nAbet(nathanael, elise)\nforall x (Uprise(x, elise) and Abet(elise, shelden) -> not Uprise(x, shelden))\nforall x (Dicky(x) -> Robed(x))\nforall x (Abet(x, elise) and not Effected(elise) -> not Abet(x, shelden))\nforall x (Demobilize(x, elise) -> Abet(x, shelden))\nforall x (Abet(x, shelden) -> not Robed(shelden))\nforall x (Uprise(x, stephie) and Abet(stephie, nathanael) -> Abet(nathanael, shelden))\nforall x (Abet(x, elise) and Abet(elise, nathanael) -> Uprise(elise, stephie))\nforall x (Abet(x, elise) -> not Uprise(elise, shelden))\n\nnot Kind(shelden)\n\nnot Kind(shelden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The truman vanish the devondra. The truman does not visit the stanton. The stanton delve the devondra. The stanton is not utility. The stanton is metacarpal. The stanton vanish the devondra. The ephrem is cervine. The ephrem is metacarpal. The ephrem does not like the truman. The ephrem does not like the devondra. The devondra is not cervine. The devondra vanish the truman. If someone delve the truman and the truman vanish the ephrem then they do not eat the ephrem. All tame people are utility. If someone vanish the truman and the truman is not cervine then they do not like the ephrem. If someone retort the truman then they like the ephrem. If someone vanish the ephrem then the ephrem is not utility. If someone delve the stanton and the stanton vanish the devondra then the devondra vanish the ephrem. If someone vanish the truman and the truman vanish the devondra then the truman delve the stanton. If someone vanish the truman then the truman does not eat the ephrem. The stanton is kind.", "logic": "\nVanish(truman, devondra)\nnot Retort(truman, stanton)\nDelve(stanton, devondra)\nnot Utility(stanton)\nMetacarpal(stanton)\nVanish(stanton, devondra)\nCervine(ephrem)\nMetacarpal(ephrem)\nnot Vanish(ephrem, truman)\nnot Vanish(ephrem, devondra)\nnot Cervine(devondra)\nVanish(devondra, truman)\nforall x (Delve(x, truman) and Vanish(truman, ephrem) -> not Delve(x, ephrem))\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Utility(x))\nforall x (Vanish(x, truman) and not Cervine(truman) -> not Vanish(x, ephrem))\nforall x (Retort(x, truman) -> Vanish(x, ephrem))\nforall x (Vanish(x, ephrem) -> not Utility(ephrem))\nforall x (Delve(x, stanton) and Vanish(stanton, devondra) -> Vanish(devondra, ephrem))\nforall x (Vanish(x, truman) and Vanish(truman, devondra) -> Delve(truman, stanton))\nforall x (Vanish(x, truman) -> not Delve(truman, ephrem))\n\nKind(stanton)\n\nKind(stanton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-893"} {"premises": "The terrence is fingerlike. The terrence dovetail the joly. The joly sulk the terrence. If the terrence is unimposing and the terrence dovetail the joly then the joly is dazzling. If someone sulk the terrence then they are not ruffianly. If someone is fingerlike then they are unimposing. If the joly segment the terrence and the terrence is dazzling then the terrence is unimposing. If someone segment the terrence then the terrence segment the joly. If the joly is dazzling then the joly dovetail the terrence. The terrence is fingerlike.", "logic": "\nFingerlike(terrence)\nDovetail(terrence, joly)\nSulk(joly, terrence)\nUnimposing(terrence) and Dovetail(terrence, joly) -> Dazzling(joly)\nforall x (Sulk(x, terrence) -> not Ruffianly(x))\nforall x (Fingerlike(x) -> Unimposing(x))\nSegment(joly, terrence) and Dazzling(terrence) -> Unimposing(terrence)\nforall x (Segment(x, terrence) -> Segment(terrence, joly))\nDazzling(joly) -> Dovetail(joly, terrence)\n\nFingerlike(terrence)\n\ntherefore Fingerlike(terrence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The harley is tannic. The harley cooper the bonny. The bonny impound the harley. If the harley is stainable and the harley cooper the bonny then the bonny is dyadic. If someone impound the harley then they are not weedless. If someone is tannic then they are stainable. If the bonny spay the harley and the harley is dyadic then the harley is stainable. If someone spay the harley then the harley spay the bonny. If the bonny is dyadic then the bonny cooper the harley. The harley does not like the bonny.", "logic": "\nTannic(harley)\nCooper(harley, bonny)\nImpound(bonny, harley)\nStainable(harley) and Cooper(harley, bonny) -> Dyadic(bonny)\nforall x (Impound(x, harley) -> not Weedless(x))\nforall x (Tannic(x) -> Stainable(x))\nSpay(bonny, harley) and Dyadic(harley) -> Stainable(harley)\nforall x (Spay(x, harley) -> Spay(harley, bonny))\nDyadic(bonny) -> Cooper(bonny, harley)\n\nnot Cooper(harley, bonny)\n\ntherefore Cooper(harley, bonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The werner is costive. The werner catechise the rebe. The rebe unreel the werner. If the werner is nauseating and the werner catechise the rebe then the rebe is unlobed. If someone unreel the werner then they are not choosey. If someone is costive then they are nauseating. If the rebe perpetuate the werner and the werner is unlobed then the werner is nauseating. If someone perpetuate the werner then the werner perpetuate the rebe. If the rebe is unlobed then the rebe catechise the werner. The werner is nauseating.", "logic": "\nCostive(werner)\nCatechise(werner, rebe)\nUnreel(rebe, werner)\nNauseating(werner) and Catechise(werner, rebe) -> Unlobed(rebe)\nforall x (Unreel(x, werner) -> not Choosey(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Nauseating(x))\nPerpetuate(rebe, werner) and Unlobed(werner) -> Nauseating(werner)\nforall x (Perpetuate(x, werner) -> Perpetuate(werner, rebe))\nUnlobed(rebe) -> Catechise(rebe, werner)\n\nNauseating(werner)\n\nCostive(werner) and forall x (Costive(x) -> Nauseating(x)) -> therefore Nauseating(werner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The glory is dizygotic. The glory harp the georgena. The georgena prohibit the glory. If the glory is unfit and the glory harp the georgena then the georgena is undefended. If someone prohibit the glory then they are not wriggly. If someone is dizygotic then they are unfit. If the georgena sudate the glory and the glory is undefended then the glory is unfit. If someone sudate the glory then the glory sudate the georgena. If the georgena is undefended then the georgena harp the glory. The glory is not unfit.", "logic": "\nDizygotic(glory)\nHarp(glory, georgena)\nProhibit(georgena, glory)\nUnfit(glory) and Harp(glory, georgena) -> Undefended(georgena)\nforall x (Prohibit(x, glory) -> not Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Dizygotic(x) -> Unfit(x))\nSudate(georgena, glory) and Undefended(glory) -> Unfit(glory)\nforall x (Sudate(x, glory) -> Sudate(glory, georgena))\nUndefended(georgena) -> Harp(georgena, glory)\n\nnot Unfit(glory)\n\nDizygotic(glory) and forall x (Dizygotic(x) -> Unfit(x)) -> therefore Unfit(glory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The rodie is ineligible. The rodie flunk the cari. The cari tope the rodie. If the rodie is endearing and the rodie flunk the cari then the cari is macerative. If someone tope the rodie then they are not faceted. If someone is ineligible then they are endearing. If the cari swathe the rodie and the rodie is macerative then the rodie is endearing. If someone swathe the rodie then the rodie swathe the cari. If the cari is macerative then the cari flunk the rodie. The cari is macerative.", "logic": "\nIneligible(rodie)\nFlunk(rodie, cari)\nTope(cari, rodie)\nEndearing(rodie) and Flunk(rodie, cari) -> Macerative(cari)\nforall x (Tope(x, rodie) -> not Faceted(x))\nforall x (Ineligible(x) -> Endearing(x))\nSwathe(cari, rodie) and Macerative(rodie) -> Endearing(rodie)\nforall x (Swathe(x, rodie) -> Swathe(rodie, cari))\nMacerative(cari) -> Flunk(cari, rodie)\n\nMacerative(cari)\n\nIneligible(rodie) and forall x (Ineligible(x) -> Endearing(x)) -> therefore Endearing(rodie) Endearing(rodie) and Flunk(rodie, cari) and Endearing(rodie) and Flunk(rodie, cari) -> Macerative(cari) -> therefore Macerative(cari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The eberhard is immutable. The eberhard execute the fowler. The fowler crush the eberhard. If the eberhard is podgy and the eberhard execute the fowler then the fowler is scarred. If someone crush the eberhard then they are not ruthful. If someone is immutable then they are podgy. If the fowler decollate the eberhard and the eberhard is scarred then the eberhard is podgy. If someone decollate the eberhard then the eberhard decollate the fowler. If the fowler is scarred then the fowler execute the eberhard. The fowler is not scarred.", "logic": "\nImmutable(eberhard)\nExecute(eberhard, fowler)\nCrush(fowler, eberhard)\nPodgy(eberhard) and Execute(eberhard, fowler) -> Scarred(fowler)\nforall x (Crush(x, eberhard) -> not Ruthful(x))\nforall x (Immutable(x) -> Podgy(x))\nDecollate(fowler, eberhard) and Scarred(eberhard) -> Podgy(eberhard)\nforall x (Decollate(x, eberhard) -> Decollate(eberhard, fowler))\nScarred(fowler) -> Execute(fowler, eberhard)\n\nnot Scarred(fowler)\n\nImmutable(eberhard) and forall x (Immutable(x) -> Podgy(x)) -> therefore Podgy(eberhard) Podgy(eberhard) and Execute(eberhard, fowler) and Podgy(eberhard) and Execute(eberhard, fowler) -> Scarred(fowler) -> therefore Scarred(fowler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The lia is romantic. The lia bang the mohammad. The mohammad squabble the lia. If the lia is debile and the lia bang the mohammad then the mohammad is himalayan. If someone squabble the lia then they are not underived. If someone is romantic then they are debile. If the mohammad acidulate the lia and the lia is himalayan then the lia is debile. If someone acidulate the lia then the lia acidulate the mohammad. If the mohammad is himalayan then the mohammad bang the lia. The mohammad bang the lia.", "logic": "\nRomantic(lia)\nBang(lia, mohammad)\nSquabble(mohammad, lia)\nDebile(lia) and Bang(lia, mohammad) -> Himalayan(mohammad)\nforall x (Squabble(x, lia) -> not Underived(x))\nforall x (Romantic(x) -> Debile(x))\nAcidulate(mohammad, lia) and Himalayan(lia) -> Debile(lia)\nforall x (Acidulate(x, lia) -> Acidulate(lia, mohammad))\nHimalayan(mohammad) -> Bang(mohammad, lia)\n\nBang(mohammad, lia)\n\nRomantic(lia) and forall x (Romantic(x) -> Debile(x)) -> therefore Debile(lia) Debile(lia) and Bang(lia, mohammad) and Debile(lia) and Bang(lia, mohammad) -> Himalayan(mohammad) -> therefore Himalayan(mohammad) Himalayan(mohammad) and Himalayan(mohammad) -> Bang(mohammad, lia) -> therefore Bang(mohammad, lia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The dalila is nodding. The dalila foist the jennine. The jennine renew the dalila. If the dalila is humourous and the dalila foist the jennine then the jennine is refined. If someone renew the dalila then they are not iodized. If someone is nodding then they are humourous. If the jennine collogue the dalila and the dalila is refined then the dalila is humourous. If someone collogue the dalila then the dalila collogue the jennine. If the jennine is refined then the jennine foist the dalila. The jennine does not like the dalila.", "logic": "\nNodding(dalila)\nFoist(dalila, jennine)\nRenew(jennine, dalila)\nHumourous(dalila) and Foist(dalila, jennine) -> Refined(jennine)\nforall x (Renew(x, dalila) -> not Iodized(x))\nforall x (Nodding(x) -> Humourous(x))\nCollogue(jennine, dalila) and Refined(dalila) -> Humourous(dalila)\nforall x (Collogue(x, dalila) -> Collogue(dalila, jennine))\nRefined(jennine) -> Foist(jennine, dalila)\n\nnot Foist(jennine, dalila)\n\nNodding(dalila) and forall x (Nodding(x) -> Humourous(x)) -> therefore Humourous(dalila) Humourous(dalila) and Foist(dalila, jennine) and Humourous(dalila) and Foist(dalila, jennine) -> Refined(jennine) -> therefore Refined(jennine) Refined(jennine) and Refined(jennine) -> Foist(jennine, dalila) -> therefore Foist(jennine, dalila)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The mariana is luminous. The mariana appall the corette. The corette chasten the mariana. If the mariana is crack and the mariana appall the corette then the corette is somatic. If someone chasten the mariana then they are not latinate. If someone is luminous then they are crack. If the corette dulcify the mariana and the mariana is somatic then the mariana is crack. If someone dulcify the mariana then the mariana dulcify the corette. If the corette is somatic then the corette appall the mariana. The mariana does not need the corette.", "logic": "\nLuminous(mariana)\nAppall(mariana, corette)\nChasten(corette, mariana)\nCrack(mariana) and Appall(mariana, corette) -> Somatic(corette)\nforall x (Chasten(x, mariana) -> not Latinate(x))\nforall x (Luminous(x) -> Crack(x))\nDulcify(corette, mariana) and Somatic(mariana) -> Crack(mariana)\nforall x (Dulcify(x, mariana) -> Dulcify(mariana, corette))\nSomatic(corette) -> Appall(corette, mariana)\n\nnot Dulcify(mariana, corette)\n\nforall x (Dulcify(x, mariana) -> Dulcify(mariana, corette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The dieter is unsnarled. The dieter license the denys. The denys vulcanise the dieter. If the dieter is caitiff and the dieter license the denys then the denys is sumptuous. If someone vulcanise the dieter then they are not duodenal. If someone is unsnarled then they are caitiff. If the denys topicalize the dieter and the dieter is sumptuous then the dieter is caitiff. If someone topicalize the dieter then the dieter topicalize the denys. If the denys is sumptuous then the denys license the dieter. The denys is caitiff.", "logic": "\nUnsnarled(dieter)\nLicense(dieter, denys)\nVulcanise(denys, dieter)\nCaitiff(dieter) and License(dieter, denys) -> Sumptuous(denys)\nforall x (Vulcanise(x, dieter) -> not Duodenal(x))\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) -> Caitiff(x))\nTopicalize(denys, dieter) and Sumptuous(dieter) -> Caitiff(dieter)\nforall x (Topicalize(x, dieter) -> Topicalize(dieter, denys))\nSumptuous(denys) -> License(denys, dieter)\n\nCaitiff(denys)\n\nforall x (Unsnarled(x) -> Caitiff(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The violetta is menstrual. The violetta spang the danice. The danice prerecord the violetta. If the violetta is cretaceous and the violetta spang the danice then the danice is pleochroic. If someone prerecord the violetta then they are not unwilling. If someone is menstrual then they are cretaceous. If the danice repair the violetta and the violetta is pleochroic then the violetta is cretaceous. If someone repair the violetta then the violetta repair the danice. If the danice is pleochroic then the danice spang the violetta. The danice is not cold.", "logic": "\nMenstrual(violetta)\nSpang(violetta, danice)\nPrerecord(danice, violetta)\nCretaceous(violetta) and Spang(violetta, danice) -> Pleochroic(danice)\nforall x (Prerecord(x, violetta) -> not Unwilling(x))\nforall x (Menstrual(x) -> Cretaceous(x))\nRepair(danice, violetta) and Pleochroic(violetta) -> Cretaceous(violetta)\nforall x (Repair(x, violetta) -> Repair(violetta, danice))\nPleochroic(danice) -> Spang(danice, violetta)\n\nnot Cold(danice)\n\nnot Cold(danice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The aurelie is rearing. The aurelie unpin the latrina. The latrina stuff the aurelie. If the aurelie is pianissimo and the aurelie unpin the latrina then the latrina is rousing. If someone stuff the aurelie then they are not atactic. If someone is rearing then they are pianissimo. If the latrina process the aurelie and the aurelie is rousing then the aurelie is pianissimo. If someone process the aurelie then the aurelie process the latrina. If the latrina is rousing then the latrina unpin the aurelie. The latrina stuff the latrina.", "logic": "\nRearing(aurelie)\nUnpin(aurelie, latrina)\nStuff(latrina, aurelie)\nPianissimo(aurelie) and Unpin(aurelie, latrina) -> Rousing(latrina)\nforall x (Stuff(x, aurelie) -> not Atactic(x))\nforall x (Rearing(x) -> Pianissimo(x))\nProcess(latrina, aurelie) and Rousing(aurelie) -> Pianissimo(aurelie)\nforall x (Process(x, aurelie) -> Process(aurelie, latrina))\nRousing(latrina) -> Unpin(latrina, aurelie)\n\nStuff(latrina, latrina)\n\nStuff(latrina, latrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The aristotle is unsaid. The aristotle roast the mady. The mady require the aristotle. If the aristotle is virtuous and the aristotle roast the mady then the mady is groovy. If someone require the aristotle then they are not blamed. If someone is unsaid then they are virtuous. If the mady faggot the aristotle and the aristotle is groovy then the aristotle is virtuous. If someone faggot the aristotle then the aristotle faggot the mady. If the mady is groovy then the mady roast the aristotle. The aristotle is not cold.", "logic": "\nUnsaid(aristotle)\nRoast(aristotle, mady)\nRequire(mady, aristotle)\nVirtuous(aristotle) and Roast(aristotle, mady) -> Groovy(mady)\nforall x (Require(x, aristotle) -> not Blamed(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Virtuous(x))\nFaggot(mady, aristotle) and Groovy(aristotle) -> Virtuous(aristotle)\nforall x (Faggot(x, aristotle) -> Faggot(aristotle, mady))\nGroovy(mady) -> Roast(mady, aristotle)\n\nnot Cold(aristotle)\n\nnot Cold(aristotle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The kirstyn is captive. The kirstyn automatise the bradly. The bradly spue the kirstyn. If the kirstyn is scaphoid and the kirstyn automatise the bradly then the bradly is evidenced. If someone spue the kirstyn then they are not vacant. If someone is captive then they are scaphoid. If the bradly sulphur the kirstyn and the kirstyn is evidenced then the kirstyn is scaphoid. If someone sulphur the kirstyn then the kirstyn sulphur the bradly. If the bradly is evidenced then the bradly automatise the kirstyn. The kirstyn spue the bradly.", "logic": "\nCaptive(kirstyn)\nAutomatise(kirstyn, bradly)\nSpue(bradly, kirstyn)\nScaphoid(kirstyn) and Automatise(kirstyn, bradly) -> Evidenced(bradly)\nforall x (Spue(x, kirstyn) -> not Vacant(x))\nforall x (Captive(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nSulphur(bradly, kirstyn) and Evidenced(kirstyn) -> Scaphoid(kirstyn)\nforall x (Sulphur(x, kirstyn) -> Sulphur(kirstyn, bradly))\nEvidenced(bradly) -> Automatise(bradly, kirstyn)\n\nSpue(kirstyn, bradly)\n\nSpue(kirstyn, bradly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The ramon is milch. The ramon nest the alli. The alli yell the ramon. If the ramon is univalent and the ramon nest the alli then the alli is bombproof. If someone yell the ramon then they are not pretorian. If someone is milch then they are univalent. If the alli lacerate the ramon and the ramon is bombproof then the ramon is univalent. If someone lacerate the ramon then the ramon lacerate the alli. If the alli is bombproof then the alli nest the ramon. The alli is not milch.", "logic": "\nMilch(ramon)\nNest(ramon, alli)\nYell(alli, ramon)\nUnivalent(ramon) and Nest(ramon, alli) -> Bombproof(alli)\nforall x (Yell(x, ramon) -> not Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Milch(x) -> Univalent(x))\nLacerate(alli, ramon) and Bombproof(ramon) -> Univalent(ramon)\nforall x (Lacerate(x, ramon) -> Lacerate(ramon, alli))\nBombproof(alli) -> Nest(alli, ramon)\n\nnot Milch(alli)\n\nnot Milch(alli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The tiff is dumpy. The tiff propel the melina. The melina deplete the tiff. If the tiff is puerile and the tiff propel the melina then the melina is baseborn. If someone deplete the tiff then they are not inert. If someone is dumpy then they are puerile. If the melina backhand the tiff and the tiff is baseborn then the tiff is puerile. If someone backhand the tiff then the tiff backhand the melina. If the melina is baseborn then the melina propel the tiff. The melina backhand the tiff.", "logic": "\nDumpy(tiff)\nPropel(tiff, melina)\nDeplete(melina, tiff)\nPuerile(tiff) and Propel(tiff, melina) -> Baseborn(melina)\nforall x (Deplete(x, tiff) -> not Inert(x))\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Puerile(x))\nBackhand(melina, tiff) and Baseborn(tiff) -> Puerile(tiff)\nforall x (Backhand(x, tiff) -> Backhand(tiff, melina))\nBaseborn(melina) -> Propel(melina, tiff)\n\nBackhand(melina, tiff)\n\nBackhand(melina, tiff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1550"} {"premises": "The bernete normalise the evania. The bernete normalise the rebekkah. The bernete is eastern. The bernete fuck the rebekkah. The evania normalise the bernete. The evania normalise the rebekkah. The evania is permanent. The evania is not tweedy. The evania fuck the rebekkah. The evania uncork the bernete. The rebekkah is eastern. The rebekkah is not cogitative. The rebekkah fuck the bernete. The rebekkah fuck the evania. The rebekkah uncork the bernete. If someone normalise the rebekkah then they need the bernete. If the rebekkah normalise the evania then the rebekkah fuck the evania. If the bernete uncork the rebekkah then the bernete fuck the evania. If someone fuck the rebekkah and they are permanent then the rebekkah uncork the evania. If the bernete fuck the evania then the evania does not chase the bernete. If someone uncork the evania then the evania uncork the rebekkah. The rebekkah is eastern.", "logic": "\nNormalise(bernete, evania)\nNormalise(bernete, rebekkah)\nEastern(bernete)\nFuck(bernete, rebekkah)\nNormalise(evania, bernete)\nNormalise(evania, rebekkah)\nPermanent(evania)\nnot Tweedy(evania)\nFuck(evania, rebekkah)\nUncork(evania, bernete)\nEastern(rebekkah)\nnot Cogitative(rebekkah)\nFuck(rebekkah, bernete)\nFuck(rebekkah, evania)\nUncork(rebekkah, bernete)\nforall x (Normalise(x, rebekkah) -> Uncork(x, bernete))\nNormalise(rebekkah, evania) -> Fuck(rebekkah, evania)\nUncork(bernete, rebekkah) -> Fuck(bernete, evania)\nforall x (Fuck(x, rebekkah) and Permanent(x) -> Uncork(rebekkah, evania))\nFuck(bernete, evania) -> not Normalise(evania, bernete)\nforall x (Uncork(x, evania) -> Uncork(evania, rebekkah))\n\nEastern(rebekkah)\n\ntherefore Eastern(rebekkah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The tawsha orient the danica. The tawsha orient the yvonne. The tawsha is vibrionic. The tawsha pile the yvonne. The danica orient the tawsha. The danica orient the yvonne. The danica is unseen. The danica is not submarine. The danica pile the yvonne. The danica arrive the tawsha. The yvonne is vibrionic. The yvonne is not haematal. The yvonne pile the tawsha. The yvonne pile the danica. The yvonne arrive the tawsha. If someone orient the yvonne then they need the tawsha. If the yvonne orient the danica then the yvonne pile the danica. If the tawsha arrive the yvonne then the tawsha pile the danica. If someone pile the yvonne and they are unseen then the yvonne arrive the danica. If the tawsha pile the danica then the danica does not chase the tawsha. If someone arrive the danica then the danica arrive the yvonne. The tawsha does not like the yvonne.", "logic": "\nOrient(tawsha, danica)\nOrient(tawsha, yvonne)\nVibrionic(tawsha)\nPile(tawsha, yvonne)\nOrient(danica, tawsha)\nOrient(danica, yvonne)\nUnseen(danica)\nnot Submarine(danica)\nPile(danica, yvonne)\nArrive(danica, tawsha)\nVibrionic(yvonne)\nnot Haematal(yvonne)\nPile(yvonne, tawsha)\nPile(yvonne, danica)\nArrive(yvonne, tawsha)\nforall x (Orient(x, yvonne) -> Arrive(x, tawsha))\nOrient(yvonne, danica) -> Pile(yvonne, danica)\nArrive(tawsha, yvonne) -> Pile(tawsha, danica)\nforall x (Pile(x, yvonne) and Unseen(x) -> Arrive(yvonne, danica))\nPile(tawsha, danica) -> not Orient(danica, tawsha)\nforall x (Arrive(x, danica) -> Arrive(danica, yvonne))\n\nnot Pile(tawsha, yvonne)\n\ntherefore Pile(tawsha, yvonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The raven carp the avery. The raven carp the daisi. The raven is flecked. The raven rust the daisi. The avery carp the raven. The avery carp the daisi. The avery is abasic. The avery is not unraised. The avery rust the daisi. The avery illume the raven. The daisi is flecked. The daisi is not flatbottom. The daisi rust the raven. The daisi rust the avery. The daisi illume the raven. If someone carp the daisi then they need the raven. If the daisi carp the avery then the daisi rust the avery. If the raven illume the daisi then the raven rust the avery. If someone rust the daisi and they are abasic then the daisi illume the avery. If the raven rust the avery then the avery does not chase the raven. If someone illume the avery then the avery illume the daisi. The daisi illume the avery.", "logic": "\nCarp(raven, avery)\nCarp(raven, daisi)\nFlecked(raven)\nRust(raven, daisi)\nCarp(avery, raven)\nCarp(avery, daisi)\nAbasic(avery)\nnot Unraised(avery)\nRust(avery, daisi)\nIllume(avery, raven)\nFlecked(daisi)\nnot Flatbottom(daisi)\nRust(daisi, raven)\nRust(daisi, avery)\nIllume(daisi, raven)\nforall x (Carp(x, daisi) -> Illume(x, raven))\nCarp(daisi, avery) -> Rust(daisi, avery)\nIllume(raven, daisi) -> Rust(raven, avery)\nforall x (Rust(x, daisi) and Abasic(x) -> Illume(daisi, avery))\nRust(raven, avery) -> not Carp(avery, raven)\nforall x (Illume(x, avery) -> Illume(avery, daisi))\n\nIllume(daisi, avery)\n\nRust(avery, daisi) and Abasic(avery) and forall x (Rust(x, daisi) and Abasic(x) -> Illume(daisi, avery)) -> therefore Illume(daisi, avery)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The denny misbehave the dove. The denny misbehave the roth. The denny is thorough. The denny lexicalise the roth. The dove misbehave the denny. The dove misbehave the roth. The dove is areolar. The dove is not stillborn. The dove lexicalise the roth. The dove blather the denny. The roth is thorough. The roth is not hydroxy. The roth lexicalise the denny. The roth lexicalise the dove. The roth blather the denny. If someone misbehave the roth then they need the denny. If the roth misbehave the dove then the roth lexicalise the dove. If the denny blather the roth then the denny lexicalise the dove. If someone lexicalise the roth and they are areolar then the roth blather the dove. If the denny lexicalise the dove then the dove does not chase the denny. If someone blather the dove then the dove blather the roth. The roth does not need the dove.", "logic": "\nMisbehave(denny, dove)\nMisbehave(denny, roth)\nThorough(denny)\nLexicalise(denny, roth)\nMisbehave(dove, denny)\nMisbehave(dove, roth)\nAreolar(dove)\nnot Stillborn(dove)\nLexicalise(dove, roth)\nBlather(dove, denny)\nThorough(roth)\nnot Hydroxy(roth)\nLexicalise(roth, denny)\nLexicalise(roth, dove)\nBlather(roth, denny)\nforall x (Misbehave(x, roth) -> Blather(x, denny))\nMisbehave(roth, dove) -> Lexicalise(roth, dove)\nBlather(denny, roth) -> Lexicalise(denny, dove)\nforall x (Lexicalise(x, roth) and Areolar(x) -> Blather(roth, dove))\nLexicalise(denny, dove) -> not Misbehave(dove, denny)\nforall x (Blather(x, dove) -> Blather(dove, roth))\n\nnot Blather(roth, dove)\n\nLexicalise(dove, roth) and Areolar(dove) and forall x (Lexicalise(x, roth) and Areolar(x) -> Blather(roth, dove)) -> therefore Blather(roth, dove)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The xenos leather the vikky. The xenos leather the kiah. The xenos is creole. The xenos enhance the kiah. The vikky leather the xenos. The vikky leather the kiah. The vikky is apraxic. The vikky is not veinlike. The vikky enhance the kiah. The vikky cloud the xenos. The kiah is creole. The kiah is not forged. The kiah enhance the xenos. The kiah enhance the vikky. The kiah cloud the xenos. If someone leather the kiah then they need the xenos. If the kiah leather the vikky then the kiah enhance the vikky. If the xenos cloud the kiah then the xenos enhance the vikky. If someone enhance the kiah and they are apraxic then the kiah cloud the vikky. If the xenos enhance the vikky then the vikky does not chase the xenos. If someone cloud the vikky then the vikky cloud the kiah. The vikky cloud the kiah.", "logic": "\nLeather(xenos, vikky)\nLeather(xenos, kiah)\nCreole(xenos)\nEnhance(xenos, kiah)\nLeather(vikky, xenos)\nLeather(vikky, kiah)\nApraxic(vikky)\nnot Veinlike(vikky)\nEnhance(vikky, kiah)\nCloud(vikky, xenos)\nCreole(kiah)\nnot Forged(kiah)\nEnhance(kiah, xenos)\nEnhance(kiah, vikky)\nCloud(kiah, xenos)\nforall x (Leather(x, kiah) -> Cloud(x, xenos))\nLeather(kiah, vikky) -> Enhance(kiah, vikky)\nCloud(xenos, kiah) -> Enhance(xenos, vikky)\nforall x (Enhance(x, kiah) and Apraxic(x) -> Cloud(kiah, vikky))\nEnhance(xenos, vikky) -> not Leather(vikky, xenos)\nforall x (Cloud(x, vikky) -> Cloud(vikky, kiah))\n\nCloud(vikky, kiah)\n\nEnhance(vikky, kiah) and Apraxic(vikky) and forall x (Enhance(x, kiah) and Apraxic(x) -> Cloud(kiah, vikky)) -> therefore Cloud(kiah, vikky) Cloud(kiah, vikky) and forall x (Cloud(x, vikky) -> Cloud(vikky, kiah)) -> therefore Cloud(vikky, kiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The gerrit doubt the mechelle. The gerrit doubt the linnea. The gerrit is araceous. The gerrit fullback the linnea. The mechelle doubt the gerrit. The mechelle doubt the linnea. The mechelle is catabolic. The mechelle is not sarcastic. The mechelle fullback the linnea. The mechelle bundle the gerrit. The linnea is araceous. The linnea is not misshapen. The linnea fullback the gerrit. The linnea fullback the mechelle. The linnea bundle the gerrit. If someone doubt the linnea then they need the gerrit. If the linnea doubt the mechelle then the linnea fullback the mechelle. If the gerrit bundle the linnea then the gerrit fullback the mechelle. If someone fullback the linnea and they are catabolic then the linnea bundle the mechelle. If the gerrit fullback the mechelle then the mechelle does not chase the gerrit. If someone bundle the mechelle then the mechelle bundle the linnea. The mechelle does not need the linnea.", "logic": "\nDoubt(gerrit, mechelle)\nDoubt(gerrit, linnea)\nAraceous(gerrit)\nFullback(gerrit, linnea)\nDoubt(mechelle, gerrit)\nDoubt(mechelle, linnea)\nCatabolic(mechelle)\nnot Sarcastic(mechelle)\nFullback(mechelle, linnea)\nBundle(mechelle, gerrit)\nAraceous(linnea)\nnot Misshapen(linnea)\nFullback(linnea, gerrit)\nFullback(linnea, mechelle)\nBundle(linnea, gerrit)\nforall x (Doubt(x, linnea) -> Bundle(x, gerrit))\nDoubt(linnea, mechelle) -> Fullback(linnea, mechelle)\nBundle(gerrit, linnea) -> Fullback(gerrit, mechelle)\nforall x (Fullback(x, linnea) and Catabolic(x) -> Bundle(linnea, mechelle))\nFullback(gerrit, mechelle) -> not Doubt(mechelle, gerrit)\nforall x (Bundle(x, mechelle) -> Bundle(mechelle, linnea))\n\nnot Bundle(mechelle, linnea)\n\nFullback(mechelle, linnea) and Catabolic(mechelle) and forall x (Fullback(x, linnea) and Catabolic(x) -> Bundle(linnea, mechelle)) -> therefore Bundle(linnea, mechelle) Bundle(linnea, mechelle) and forall x (Bundle(x, mechelle) -> Bundle(mechelle, linnea)) -> therefore Bundle(mechelle, linnea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The ace coconspire the kristin. The ace coconspire the verine. The ace is caucasian. The ace damp the verine. The kristin coconspire the ace. The kristin coconspire the verine. The kristin is yogistic. The kristin is not exoergic. The kristin damp the verine. The kristin saponify the ace. The verine is caucasian. The verine is not nonvisual. The verine damp the ace. The verine damp the kristin. The verine saponify the ace. If someone coconspire the verine then they need the ace. If the verine coconspire the kristin then the verine damp the kristin. If the ace saponify the verine then the ace damp the kristin. If someone damp the verine and they are yogistic then the verine saponify the kristin. If the ace damp the kristin then the kristin does not chase the ace. If someone saponify the kristin then the kristin saponify the verine. The ace does not like the kristin.", "logic": "\nCoconspire(ace, kristin)\nCoconspire(ace, verine)\nCaucasian(ace)\nDamp(ace, verine)\nCoconspire(kristin, ace)\nCoconspire(kristin, verine)\nYogistic(kristin)\nnot Exoergic(kristin)\nDamp(kristin, verine)\nSaponify(kristin, ace)\nCaucasian(verine)\nnot Nonvisual(verine)\nDamp(verine, ace)\nDamp(verine, kristin)\nSaponify(verine, ace)\nforall x (Coconspire(x, verine) -> Saponify(x, ace))\nCoconspire(verine, kristin) -> Damp(verine, kristin)\nSaponify(ace, verine) -> Damp(ace, kristin)\nforall x (Damp(x, verine) and Yogistic(x) -> Saponify(verine, kristin))\nDamp(ace, kristin) -> not Coconspire(kristin, ace)\nforall x (Saponify(x, kristin) -> Saponify(kristin, verine))\n\nnot Damp(ace, kristin)\n\nSaponify(ace, verine) -> Damp(ace, kristin) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The carmela twitch the karola. The carmela twitch the kacey. The carmela is feeble. The carmela skirmish the kacey. The karola twitch the carmela. The karola twitch the kacey. The karola is spayed. The karola is not flighted. The karola skirmish the kacey. The karola defuse the carmela. The kacey is feeble. The kacey is not ceremonial. The kacey skirmish the carmela. The kacey skirmish the karola. The kacey defuse the carmela. If someone twitch the kacey then they need the carmela. If the kacey twitch the karola then the kacey skirmish the karola. If the carmela defuse the kacey then the carmela skirmish the karola. If someone skirmish the kacey and they are spayed then the kacey defuse the karola. If the carmela skirmish the karola then the karola does not chase the carmela. If someone defuse the karola then the karola defuse the kacey. The carmela skirmish the carmela.", "logic": "\nTwitch(carmela, karola)\nTwitch(carmela, kacey)\nFeeble(carmela)\nSkirmish(carmela, kacey)\nTwitch(karola, carmela)\nTwitch(karola, kacey)\nSpayed(karola)\nnot Flighted(karola)\nSkirmish(karola, kacey)\nDefuse(karola, carmela)\nFeeble(kacey)\nnot Ceremonial(kacey)\nSkirmish(kacey, carmela)\nSkirmish(kacey, karola)\nDefuse(kacey, carmela)\nforall x (Twitch(x, kacey) -> Defuse(x, carmela))\nTwitch(kacey, karola) -> Skirmish(kacey, karola)\nDefuse(carmela, kacey) -> Skirmish(carmela, karola)\nforall x (Skirmish(x, kacey) and Spayed(x) -> Defuse(kacey, karola))\nSkirmish(carmela, karola) -> not Twitch(karola, carmela)\nforall x (Defuse(x, karola) -> Defuse(karola, kacey))\n\nSkirmish(carmela, carmela)\n\nSkirmish(carmela, carmela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The jane declaw the julina. The jane declaw the sileas. The jane is remorseful. The jane handwash the sileas. The julina declaw the jane. The julina declaw the sileas. The julina is qabalistic. The julina is not consenting. The julina handwash the sileas. The julina victimize the jane. The sileas is remorseful. The sileas is not tokenish. The sileas handwash the jane. The sileas handwash the julina. The sileas victimize the jane. If someone declaw the sileas then they need the jane. If the sileas declaw the julina then the sileas handwash the julina. If the jane victimize the sileas then the jane handwash the julina. If someone handwash the sileas and they are qabalistic then the sileas victimize the julina. If the jane handwash the julina then the julina does not chase the jane. If someone victimize the julina then the julina victimize the sileas. The jane is not qabalistic.", "logic": "\nDeclaw(jane, julina)\nDeclaw(jane, sileas)\nRemorseful(jane)\nHandwash(jane, sileas)\nDeclaw(julina, jane)\nDeclaw(julina, sileas)\nQabalistic(julina)\nnot Consenting(julina)\nHandwash(julina, sileas)\nVictimize(julina, jane)\nRemorseful(sileas)\nnot Tokenish(sileas)\nHandwash(sileas, jane)\nHandwash(sileas, julina)\nVictimize(sileas, jane)\nforall x (Declaw(x, sileas) -> Victimize(x, jane))\nDeclaw(sileas, julina) -> Handwash(sileas, julina)\nVictimize(jane, sileas) -> Handwash(jane, julina)\nforall x (Handwash(x, sileas) and Qabalistic(x) -> Victimize(sileas, julina))\nHandwash(jane, julina) -> not Declaw(julina, jane)\nforall x (Victimize(x, julina) -> Victimize(julina, sileas))\n\nnot Qabalistic(jane)\n\nnot Qabalistic(jane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The richie mussitate the waylen. The richie mussitate the ric. The richie is paunchy. The richie station the ric. The waylen mussitate the richie. The waylen mussitate the ric. The waylen is adulatory. The waylen is not flaunty. The waylen station the ric. The waylen demoralize the richie. The ric is paunchy. The ric is not comic. The ric station the richie. The ric station the waylen. The ric demoralize the richie. If someone mussitate the ric then they need the richie. If the ric mussitate the waylen then the ric station the waylen. If the richie demoralize the ric then the richie station the waylen. If someone station the ric and they are adulatory then the ric demoralize the waylen. If the richie station the waylen then the waylen does not chase the richie. If someone demoralize the waylen then the waylen demoralize the ric. The ric demoralize the ric.", "logic": "\nMussitate(richie, waylen)\nMussitate(richie, ric)\nPaunchy(richie)\nStation(richie, ric)\nMussitate(waylen, richie)\nMussitate(waylen, ric)\nAdulatory(waylen)\nnot Flaunty(waylen)\nStation(waylen, ric)\nDemoralize(waylen, richie)\nPaunchy(ric)\nnot Comic(ric)\nStation(ric, richie)\nStation(ric, waylen)\nDemoralize(ric, richie)\nforall x (Mussitate(x, ric) -> Demoralize(x, richie))\nMussitate(ric, waylen) -> Station(ric, waylen)\nDemoralize(richie, ric) -> Station(richie, waylen)\nforall x (Station(x, ric) and Adulatory(x) -> Demoralize(ric, waylen))\nStation(richie, waylen) -> not Mussitate(waylen, richie)\nforall x (Demoralize(x, waylen) -> Demoralize(waylen, ric))\n\nDemoralize(ric, ric)\n\nDemoralize(ric, ric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The barbee thread the lida. The barbee thread the trevor. The barbee is biologic. The barbee polemize the trevor. The lida thread the barbee. The lida thread the trevor. The lida is mercurous. The lida is not dandified. The lida polemize the trevor. The lida genuflect the barbee. The trevor is biologic. The trevor is not motivative. The trevor polemize the barbee. The trevor polemize the lida. The trevor genuflect the barbee. If someone thread the trevor then they need the barbee. If the trevor thread the lida then the trevor polemize the lida. If the barbee genuflect the trevor then the barbee polemize the lida. If someone polemize the trevor and they are mercurous then the trevor genuflect the lida. If the barbee polemize the lida then the lida does not chase the barbee. If someone genuflect the lida then the lida genuflect the trevor. The barbee is not nice.", "logic": "\nThread(barbee, lida)\nThread(barbee, trevor)\nBiologic(barbee)\nPolemize(barbee, trevor)\nThread(lida, barbee)\nThread(lida, trevor)\nMercurous(lida)\nnot Dandified(lida)\nPolemize(lida, trevor)\nGenuflect(lida, barbee)\nBiologic(trevor)\nnot Motivative(trevor)\nPolemize(trevor, barbee)\nPolemize(trevor, lida)\nGenuflect(trevor, barbee)\nforall x (Thread(x, trevor) -> Genuflect(x, barbee))\nThread(trevor, lida) -> Polemize(trevor, lida)\nGenuflect(barbee, trevor) -> Polemize(barbee, lida)\nforall x (Polemize(x, trevor) and Mercurous(x) -> Genuflect(trevor, lida))\nPolemize(barbee, lida) -> not Thread(lida, barbee)\nforall x (Genuflect(x, lida) -> Genuflect(lida, trevor))\n\nnot Nice(barbee)\n\nnot Nice(barbee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "The luke reave the ronda. The luke reave the othilia. The luke is overdue. The luke roar the othilia. The ronda reave the luke. The ronda reave the othilia. The ronda is haitian. The ronda is not outmoded. The ronda roar the othilia. The ronda mean the luke. The othilia is overdue. The othilia is not emboldened. The othilia roar the luke. The othilia roar the ronda. The othilia mean the luke. If someone reave the othilia then they need the luke. If the othilia reave the ronda then the othilia roar the ronda. If the luke mean the othilia then the luke roar the ronda. If someone roar the othilia and they are haitian then the othilia mean the ronda. If the luke roar the ronda then the ronda does not chase the luke. If someone mean the ronda then the ronda mean the othilia. The othilia is nice.", "logic": "\nReave(luke, ronda)\nReave(luke, othilia)\nOverdue(luke)\nRoar(luke, othilia)\nReave(ronda, luke)\nReave(ronda, othilia)\nHaitian(ronda)\nnot Outmoded(ronda)\nRoar(ronda, othilia)\nMean(ronda, luke)\nOverdue(othilia)\nnot Emboldened(othilia)\nRoar(othilia, luke)\nRoar(othilia, ronda)\nMean(othilia, luke)\nforall x (Reave(x, othilia) -> Mean(x, luke))\nReave(othilia, ronda) -> Roar(othilia, ronda)\nMean(luke, othilia) -> Roar(luke, ronda)\nforall x (Roar(x, othilia) and Haitian(x) -> Mean(othilia, ronda))\nRoar(luke, ronda) -> not Reave(ronda, luke)\nforall x (Mean(x, ronda) -> Mean(ronda, othilia))\n\nNice(othilia)\n\nNice(othilia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1836"} {"premises": "Tarah is stative. Hoyt is northeast. Whit is dantesque. Garvin is liberated. All dantesque, lancinate things are northeast. All dantesque things are lancinate. Tarah is stative.", "logic": "\nStative(tarah)\nNortheast(hoyt)\nDantesque(whit)\nLiberated(garvin)\nforall x (Dantesque(x) and Lancinate(x) -> Northeast(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Lancinate(x))\n\nStative(tarah)\n\ntherefore Stative(tarah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Van is fraught. Benton is absorbent. Rianon is fabled. Percy is napped. All fabled, foetal things are absorbent. All fabled things are foetal. Percy is not napped.", "logic": "\nFraught(van)\nAbsorbent(benton)\nFabled(rianon)\nNapped(percy)\nforall x (Fabled(x) and Foetal(x) -> Absorbent(x))\nforall x (Fabled(x) -> Foetal(x))\n\nnot Napped(percy)\n\ntherefore Napped(percy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Tiena is pixilated. Adlai is unbordered. Augusto is articled. Jacquelin is parvenue. All articled, exterior things are unbordered. All articled things are exterior. Augusto is exterior.", "logic": "\nPixilated(tiena)\nUnbordered(adlai)\nArticled(augusto)\nParvenue(jacquelin)\nforall x (Articled(x) and Exterior(x) -> Unbordered(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Exterior(x))\n\nExterior(augusto)\n\nArticled(augusto) and forall x (Articled(x) -> Exterior(x)) -> therefore Exterior(augusto)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Monica is plodding. Pyotr is equipoised. Cappella is hectic. Salomo is elflike. All hectic, next things are equipoised. All hectic things are next. Cappella is not next.", "logic": "\nPlodding(monica)\nEquipoised(pyotr)\nHectic(cappella)\nElflike(salomo)\nforall x (Hectic(x) and Next(x) -> Equipoised(x))\nforall x (Hectic(x) -> Next(x))\n\nnot Next(cappella)\n\nHectic(cappella) and forall x (Hectic(x) -> Next(x)) -> therefore Next(cappella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Juliana is uninfected. Torey is liberated. Carroll is abounding. Electra is bigheaded. All abounding, orgiastic things are liberated. All abounding things are orgiastic. Carroll is liberated.", "logic": "\nUninfected(juliana)\nLiberated(torey)\nAbounding(carroll)\nBigheaded(electra)\nforall x (Abounding(x) and Orgiastic(x) -> Liberated(x))\nforall x (Abounding(x) -> Orgiastic(x))\n\nLiberated(carroll)\n\nAbounding(carroll) and forall x (Abounding(x) -> Orgiastic(x)) -> therefore Orgiastic(carroll) Abounding(carroll) and Orgiastic(carroll) and forall x (Abounding(x) and Orgiastic(x) -> Liberated(x)) -> therefore Liberated(carroll)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Westbrook is underhung. Waverley is anecdotic. Alberta is pyramidal. Desdemona is numerate. All pyramidal, intimate things are anecdotic. All pyramidal things are intimate. Alberta is not anecdotic.", "logic": "\nUnderhung(westbrook)\nAnecdotic(waverley)\nPyramidal(alberta)\nNumerate(desdemona)\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) and Intimate(x) -> Anecdotic(x))\nforall x (Pyramidal(x) -> Intimate(x))\n\nnot Anecdotic(alberta)\n\nPyramidal(alberta) and forall x (Pyramidal(x) -> Intimate(x)) -> therefore Intimate(alberta) Pyramidal(alberta) and Intimate(alberta) and forall x (Pyramidal(x) and Intimate(x) -> Anecdotic(x)) -> therefore Anecdotic(alberta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Jennilee is calm. Lorette is dilatory. Kermie is agonistic. Francois is groomed. All agonistic, wraithlike things are dilatory. All agonistic things are wraithlike. Francois is not wraithlike.", "logic": "\nCalm(jennilee)\nDilatory(lorette)\nAgonistic(kermie)\nGroomed(francois)\nforall x (Agonistic(x) and Wraithlike(x) -> Dilatory(x))\nforall x (Agonistic(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\n\nnot Wraithlike(francois)\n\nforall x (Agonistic(x) -> Wraithlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Sheree is derisive. Geoffrey is palmar. Gaynor is cunning. Maurene is briery. All cunning, chewy things are palmar. All cunning things are chewy. Geoffrey is chewy.", "logic": "\nDerisive(sheree)\nPalmar(geoffrey)\nCunning(gaynor)\nBriery(maurene)\nforall x (Cunning(x) and Chewy(x) -> Palmar(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Chewy(x))\n\nChewy(geoffrey)\n\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Chewy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Marsha is hoggish. Dynah is stoppable. Wilow is fulfilled. Muriel is sprigged. All fulfilled, tall things are stoppable. All fulfilled things are tall. Marsha is not stoppable.", "logic": "\nHoggish(marsha)\nStoppable(dynah)\nFulfilled(wilow)\nSprigged(muriel)\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) and Tall(x) -> Stoppable(x))\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) -> Tall(x))\n\nnot Stoppable(marsha)\n\nforall x (Fulfilled(x) and Tall(x) -> Stoppable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Hadrian is crude. Rochette is batwing. Francyne is downstairs. Tobye is limitless. All downstairs, littoral things are batwing. All downstairs things are littoral. Rochette is red.", "logic": "\nCrude(hadrian)\nBatwing(rochette)\nDownstairs(francyne)\nLimitless(tobye)\nforall x (Downstairs(x) and Littoral(x) -> Batwing(x))\nforall x (Downstairs(x) -> Littoral(x))\n\nRed(rochette)\n\nRed(rochette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Ariel is choice. Lisabeth is aeronautic. Osbourn is frolicky. Allina is northbound. All frolicky, extreme things are aeronautic. All frolicky things are extreme. Allina is not rough.", "logic": "\nChoice(ariel)\nAeronautic(lisabeth)\nFrolicky(osbourn)\nNorthbound(allina)\nforall x (Frolicky(x) and Extreme(x) -> Aeronautic(x))\nforall x (Frolicky(x) -> Extreme(x))\n\nnot Rough(allina)\n\nnot Rough(allina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "Donielle is seaward. Alia is steely. Conan is deprived. Mack is simulated. All deprived, under things are steely. All deprived things are under. Conan is seaward.", "logic": "\nSeaward(donielle)\nSteely(alia)\nDeprived(conan)\nSimulated(mack)\nforall x (Deprived(x) and Under(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Deprived(x) -> Under(x))\n\nSeaward(conan)\n\nSeaward(conan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1253"} {"premises": "The erl tangle the preston. The preston idle the erl. If something idle the erl then the erl does not visit the preston. The preston idle the erl.", "logic": "\nTangle(erl, preston)\nIdle(preston, erl)\nforall x (Idle(x, erl) -> not Vermilion(erl, preston))\n\nIdle(preston, erl)\n\ntherefore Idle(preston, erl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5712"} {"premises": "The shalom contract the barron. The barron twin the shalom. If something twin the shalom then the shalom does not visit the barron. The shalom does not like the barron.", "logic": "\nContract(shalom, barron)\nTwin(barron, shalom)\nforall x (Twin(x, shalom) -> not Discuss(shalom, barron))\n\nnot Contract(shalom, barron)\n\ntherefore Contract(shalom, barron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5712"} {"premises": "The laurianne overtax the rhodia. The rhodia misbelieve the laurianne. If something misbelieve the laurianne then the laurianne does not visit the rhodia. The rhodia is not kind.", "logic": "\nOvertax(laurianne, rhodia)\nMisbelieve(rhodia, laurianne)\nforall x (Misbelieve(x, laurianne) -> not Detour(laurianne, rhodia))\n\nnot Kind(rhodia)\n\nnot Kind(rhodia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5712"} {"premises": "The tulley enumerate the atalanta. The atalanta terminate the tulley. If something terminate the tulley then the tulley does not visit the atalanta. The tulley is round.", "logic": "\nEnumerate(tulley, atalanta)\nTerminate(atalanta, tulley)\nforall x (Terminate(x, tulley) -> not Invalidate(tulley, atalanta))\n\nRound(tulley)\n\nRound(tulley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-5712"} {"premises": "The albertina knight the phyllida. The albertina is flecked. The albertina complexion the phyllida. The albertina complexion the sharline. The phyllida knight the sharline. The phyllida hustle the albertina. The phyllida hustle the sharline. The phyllida is paved. The phyllida is flecked. The phyllida is benumbed. The phyllida is guinean. The sharline knight the albertina. The sharline hustle the phyllida. The sharline is flecked. The sharline complexion the albertina. The sharline complexion the phyllida. If someone hustle the phyllida and they are paved then the phyllida hustle the albertina. If someone hustle the phyllida and the phyllida knight the sharline then the sharline is paved. If someone is paved then they chase the albertina. If someone complexion the albertina then they see the sharline. If someone is flecked then they see the sharline. If someone complexion the albertina and the albertina complexion the sharline then the albertina knight the phyllida. The sharline knight the albertina.", "logic": "\nKnight(albertina, phyllida)\nFlecked(albertina)\nComplexion(albertina, phyllida)\nComplexion(albertina, sharline)\nKnight(phyllida, sharline)\nHustle(phyllida, albertina)\nHustle(phyllida, sharline)\nPaved(phyllida)\nFlecked(phyllida)\nBenumbed(phyllida)\nGuinean(phyllida)\nKnight(sharline, albertina)\nHustle(sharline, phyllida)\nFlecked(sharline)\nComplexion(sharline, albertina)\nComplexion(sharline, phyllida)\nforall x (Hustle(x, phyllida) and Paved(x) -> Hustle(phyllida, albertina))\nforall x (Hustle(x, phyllida) and Knight(phyllida, sharline) -> Paved(sharline))\nforall x (Paved(x) -> Knight(x, albertina))\nforall x (Complexion(x, albertina) -> Complexion(x, sharline))\nforall x (Flecked(x) -> Complexion(x, sharline))\nforall x (Complexion(x, albertina) and Complexion(albertina, sharline) -> Knight(albertina, phyllida))\n\nKnight(sharline, albertina)\n\ntherefore Knight(sharline, albertina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5826"} {"premises": "The cayla shudder the cheri. The cayla is buried. The cayla raise the cheri. The cayla raise the torrey. The cheri shudder the torrey. The cheri ritualise the cayla. The cheri ritualise the torrey. The cheri is unstudied. The cheri is buried. The cheri is excrescent. The cheri is septate. The torrey shudder the cayla. The torrey ritualise the cheri. The torrey is buried. The torrey raise the cayla. The torrey raise the cheri. If someone ritualise the cheri and they are unstudied then the cheri ritualise the cayla. If someone ritualise the cheri and the cheri shudder the torrey then the torrey is unstudied. If someone is unstudied then they chase the cayla. If someone raise the cayla then they see the torrey. If someone is buried then they see the torrey. If someone raise the cayla and the cayla raise the torrey then the cayla shudder the cheri. The cheri does not eat the torrey.", "logic": "\nShudder(cayla, cheri)\nBuried(cayla)\nRaise(cayla, cheri)\nRaise(cayla, torrey)\nShudder(cheri, torrey)\nRitualise(cheri, cayla)\nRitualise(cheri, torrey)\nUnstudied(cheri)\nBuried(cheri)\nExcrescent(cheri)\nSeptate(cheri)\nShudder(torrey, cayla)\nRitualise(torrey, cheri)\nBuried(torrey)\nRaise(torrey, cayla)\nRaise(torrey, cheri)\nforall x (Ritualise(x, cheri) and Unstudied(x) -> Ritualise(cheri, cayla))\nforall x (Ritualise(x, cheri) and Shudder(cheri, torrey) -> Unstudied(torrey))\nforall x (Unstudied(x) -> Shudder(x, cayla))\nforall x (Raise(x, cayla) -> Raise(x, torrey))\nforall x (Buried(x) -> Raise(x, torrey))\nforall x (Raise(x, cayla) and Raise(cayla, torrey) -> Shudder(cayla, cheri))\n\nnot Ritualise(cheri, torrey)\n\ntherefore Ritualise(cheri, torrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5826"} {"premises": "The franz concretize the corrianne. The franz is clogging. The franz whimper the corrianne. The franz whimper the paula. The corrianne concretize the paula. The corrianne integrate the franz. The corrianne integrate the paula. The corrianne is nicaraguan. The corrianne is clogging. The corrianne is calced. The corrianne is dolourous. The paula concretize the franz. The paula integrate the corrianne. The paula is clogging. The paula whimper the franz. The paula whimper the corrianne. If someone integrate the corrianne and they are nicaraguan then the corrianne integrate the franz. If someone integrate the corrianne and the corrianne concretize the paula then the paula is nicaraguan. If someone is nicaraguan then they chase the franz. If someone whimper the franz then they see the paula. If someone is clogging then they see the paula. If someone whimper the franz and the franz whimper the paula then the franz concretize the corrianne. The franz does not chase the franz.", "logic": "\nConcretize(franz, corrianne)\nClogging(franz)\nWhimper(franz, corrianne)\nWhimper(franz, paula)\nConcretize(corrianne, paula)\nIntegrate(corrianne, franz)\nIntegrate(corrianne, paula)\nNicaraguan(corrianne)\nClogging(corrianne)\nCalced(corrianne)\nDolourous(corrianne)\nConcretize(paula, franz)\nIntegrate(paula, corrianne)\nClogging(paula)\nWhimper(paula, franz)\nWhimper(paula, corrianne)\nforall x (Integrate(x, corrianne) and Nicaraguan(x) -> Integrate(corrianne, franz))\nforall x (Integrate(x, corrianne) and Concretize(corrianne, paula) -> Nicaraguan(paula))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Concretize(x, franz))\nforall x (Whimper(x, franz) -> Whimper(x, paula))\nforall x (Clogging(x) -> Whimper(x, paula))\nforall x (Whimper(x, franz) and Whimper(franz, paula) -> Concretize(franz, corrianne))\n\nnot Concretize(franz, franz)\n\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Concretize(x, franz)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5826"} {"premises": "The rodd test the way. The rodd is affected. The rodd swirl the way. The rodd swirl the eula. The way test the eula. The way congee the rodd. The way congee the eula. The way is hardfisted. The way is affected. The way is exchanged. The way is frontmost. The eula test the rodd. The eula congee the way. The eula is affected. The eula swirl the rodd. The eula swirl the way. If someone congee the way and they are hardfisted then the way congee the rodd. If someone congee the way and the way test the eula then the eula is hardfisted. If someone is hardfisted then they chase the rodd. If someone swirl the rodd then they see the eula. If someone is affected then they see the eula. If someone swirl the rodd and the rodd swirl the eula then the rodd test the way. The way test the way.", "logic": "\nTest(rodd, way)\nAffected(rodd)\nSwirl(rodd, way)\nSwirl(rodd, eula)\nTest(way, eula)\nCongee(way, rodd)\nCongee(way, eula)\nHardfisted(way)\nAffected(way)\nExchanged(way)\nFrontmost(way)\nTest(eula, rodd)\nCongee(eula, way)\nAffected(eula)\nSwirl(eula, rodd)\nSwirl(eula, way)\nforall x (Congee(x, way) and Hardfisted(x) -> Congee(way, rodd))\nforall x (Congee(x, way) and Test(way, eula) -> Hardfisted(eula))\nforall x (Hardfisted(x) -> Test(x, rodd))\nforall x (Swirl(x, rodd) -> Swirl(x, eula))\nforall x (Affected(x) -> Swirl(x, eula))\nforall x (Swirl(x, rodd) and Swirl(rodd, eula) -> Test(rodd, way))\n\nTest(way, way)\n\nTest(way, way) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5826"} {"premises": "Ave is downtown. Melodie is uncurved. Estele is sombre. Lizbeth is uncurved. All then things are sombre. If something is variform and then then it is uncurved. If something is mesozoic and downtown then it is uncurved. All then, sombre things are mesozoic. If something is uncurved then it is mesozoic. If something is mesozoic then it is then. Quiet things are sombre. If Ave is uncurved and Ave is downtown then Ave is variform. Lizbeth is uncurved.", "logic": "\nDowntown(ave)\nUncurved(melodie)\nSombre(estele)\nUncurved(lizbeth)\nforall x (Then(x) -> Sombre(x))\nforall x (Variform(x) and Then(x) -> Uncurved(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) and Downtown(x) -> Uncurved(x))\nforall x (Then(x) and Sombre(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nforall x (Uncurved(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Then(x))\nforall x (Variform(x) -> Sombre(x))\nUncurved(ave) and Downtown(ave) -> Variform(ave)\n\nUncurved(lizbeth)\n\ntherefore Uncurved(lizbeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Kenneth is impish. Berchtold is practiced. Fabrice is faltering. Susanetta is practiced. All dowered things are faltering. If something is hortative and dowered then it is practiced. If something is tillable and impish then it is practiced. All dowered, faltering things are tillable. If something is practiced then it is tillable. If something is tillable then it is dowered. Quiet things are faltering. If Kenneth is practiced and Kenneth is impish then Kenneth is hortative. Kenneth is not impish.", "logic": "\nImpish(kenneth)\nPracticed(berchtold)\nFaltering(fabrice)\nPracticed(susanetta)\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Faltering(x))\nforall x (Hortative(x) and Dowered(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Tillable(x) and Impish(x) -> Practiced(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) and Faltering(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Practiced(x) -> Tillable(x))\nforall x (Tillable(x) -> Dowered(x))\nforall x (Hortative(x) -> Faltering(x))\nPracticed(kenneth) and Impish(kenneth) -> Hortative(kenneth)\n\nnot Impish(kenneth)\n\ntherefore Impish(kenneth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Stephie is lipless. Diana is epithelial. Jennie is bacterial. Kacie is epithelial. All twinned things are bacterial. If something is idolatrous and twinned then it is epithelial. If something is azonal and lipless then it is epithelial. All twinned, bacterial things are azonal. If something is epithelial then it is azonal. If something is azonal then it is twinned. Quiet things are bacterial. If Stephie is epithelial and Stephie is lipless then Stephie is idolatrous. Diana is azonal.", "logic": "\nLipless(stephie)\nEpithelial(diana)\nBacterial(jennie)\nEpithelial(kacie)\nforall x (Twinned(x) -> Bacterial(x))\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) and Twinned(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Azonal(x) and Lipless(x) -> Epithelial(x))\nforall x (Twinned(x) and Bacterial(x) -> Azonal(x))\nforall x (Epithelial(x) -> Azonal(x))\nforall x (Azonal(x) -> Twinned(x))\nforall x (Idolatrous(x) -> Bacterial(x))\nEpithelial(stephie) and Lipless(stephie) -> Idolatrous(stephie)\n\nAzonal(diana)\n\nEpithelial(diana) and forall x (Epithelial(x) -> Azonal(x)) -> therefore Azonal(diana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Karlene is unspoiled. Ashly is disclosed. Jemimah is displeased. Loralyn is disclosed. All endogamous things are displeased. If something is nestorian and endogamous then it is disclosed. If something is fibrous and unspoiled then it is disclosed. All endogamous, displeased things are fibrous. If something is disclosed then it is fibrous. If something is fibrous then it is endogamous. Quiet things are displeased. If Karlene is disclosed and Karlene is unspoiled then Karlene is nestorian. Loralyn is not fibrous.", "logic": "\nUnspoiled(karlene)\nDisclosed(ashly)\nDispleased(jemimah)\nDisclosed(loralyn)\nforall x (Endogamous(x) -> Displeased(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) and Endogamous(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) and Unspoiled(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Endogamous(x) and Displeased(x) -> Fibrous(x))\nforall x (Disclosed(x) -> Fibrous(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) -> Endogamous(x))\nforall x (Nestorian(x) -> Displeased(x))\nDisclosed(karlene) and Unspoiled(karlene) -> Nestorian(karlene)\n\nnot Fibrous(loralyn)\n\nDisclosed(loralyn) and forall x (Disclosed(x) -> Fibrous(x)) -> therefore Fibrous(loralyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Spiros is epilithic. Prudy is glabrous. Lissi is ruritanian. Rosemaria is glabrous. All judicious things are ruritanian. If something is hedged and judicious then it is glabrous. If something is uninjured and epilithic then it is glabrous. All judicious, ruritanian things are uninjured. If something is glabrous then it is uninjured. If something is uninjured then it is judicious. Quiet things are ruritanian. If Spiros is glabrous and Spiros is epilithic then Spiros is hedged. Prudy is judicious.", "logic": "\nEpilithic(spiros)\nGlabrous(prudy)\nRuritanian(lissi)\nGlabrous(rosemaria)\nforall x (Judicious(x) -> Ruritanian(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) and Judicious(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nforall x (Uninjured(x) and Epilithic(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nforall x (Judicious(x) and Ruritanian(x) -> Uninjured(x))\nforall x (Glabrous(x) -> Uninjured(x))\nforall x (Uninjured(x) -> Judicious(x))\nforall x (Hedged(x) -> Ruritanian(x))\nGlabrous(spiros) and Epilithic(spiros) -> Hedged(spiros)\n\nJudicious(prudy)\n\nGlabrous(prudy) and forall x (Glabrous(x) -> Uninjured(x)) -> therefore Uninjured(prudy) Uninjured(prudy) and forall x (Uninjured(x) -> Judicious(x)) -> therefore Judicious(prudy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Ekaterina is abused. Harman is nomothetic. Ernest is caller. Sonnnie is nomothetic. All unimpaired things are caller. If something is penal and unimpaired then it is nomothetic. If something is citrous and abused then it is nomothetic. All unimpaired, caller things are citrous. If something is nomothetic then it is citrous. If something is citrous then it is unimpaired. Quiet things are caller. If Ekaterina is nomothetic and Ekaterina is abused then Ekaterina is penal. Harman is not unimpaired.", "logic": "\nAbused(ekaterina)\nNomothetic(harman)\nCaller(ernest)\nNomothetic(sonnnie)\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) -> Caller(x))\nforall x (Penal(x) and Unimpaired(x) -> Nomothetic(x))\nforall x (Citrous(x) and Abused(x) -> Nomothetic(x))\nforall x (Unimpaired(x) and Caller(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Nomothetic(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Citrous(x) -> Unimpaired(x))\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Caller(x))\nNomothetic(ekaterina) and Abused(ekaterina) -> Penal(ekaterina)\n\nnot Unimpaired(harman)\n\nNomothetic(harman) and forall x (Nomothetic(x) -> Citrous(x)) -> therefore Citrous(harman) Citrous(harman) and forall x (Citrous(x) -> Unimpaired(x)) -> therefore Unimpaired(harman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Analiese is spousal. Siward is hortatory. Marj is spiraling. Halimeda is hortatory. All alchemical things are spiraling. If something is wavering and alchemical then it is hortatory. If something is associate and spousal then it is hortatory. All alchemical, spiraling things are associate. If something is hortatory then it is associate. If something is associate then it is alchemical. Quiet things are spiraling. If Analiese is hortatory and Analiese is spousal then Analiese is wavering. Halimeda is spiraling.", "logic": "\nSpousal(analiese)\nHortatory(siward)\nSpiraling(marj)\nHortatory(halimeda)\nforall x (Alchemical(x) -> Spiraling(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) and Alchemical(x) -> Hortatory(x))\nforall x (Associate(x) and Spousal(x) -> Hortatory(x))\nforall x (Alchemical(x) and Spiraling(x) -> Associate(x))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) -> Associate(x))\nforall x (Associate(x) -> Alchemical(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) -> Spiraling(x))\nHortatory(analiese) and Spousal(analiese) -> Wavering(analiese)\n\nSpiraling(halimeda)\n\nHortatory(halimeda) and forall x (Hortatory(x) -> Associate(x)) -> therefore Associate(halimeda) Associate(halimeda) and forall x (Associate(x) -> Alchemical(x)) -> therefore Alchemical(halimeda) Alchemical(halimeda) and forall x (Alchemical(x) -> Spiraling(x)) -> therefore Spiraling(halimeda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Sarah is trillion. Liliane is blaring. Dede is unsociable. Hestia is blaring. All homing things are unsociable. If something is expiratory and homing then it is blaring. If something is caliginous and trillion then it is blaring. All homing, unsociable things are caliginous. If something is blaring then it is caliginous. If something is caliginous then it is homing. Quiet things are unsociable. If Sarah is blaring and Sarah is trillion then Sarah is expiratory. Liliane is not unsociable.", "logic": "\nTrillion(sarah)\nBlaring(liliane)\nUnsociable(dede)\nBlaring(hestia)\nforall x (Homing(x) -> Unsociable(x))\nforall x (Expiratory(x) and Homing(x) -> Blaring(x))\nforall x (Caliginous(x) and Trillion(x) -> Blaring(x))\nforall x (Homing(x) and Unsociable(x) -> Caliginous(x))\nforall x (Blaring(x) -> Caliginous(x))\nforall x (Caliginous(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Expiratory(x) -> Unsociable(x))\nBlaring(sarah) and Trillion(sarah) -> Expiratory(sarah)\n\nnot Unsociable(liliane)\n\nBlaring(liliane) and forall x (Blaring(x) -> Caliginous(x)) -> therefore Caliginous(liliane) Caliginous(liliane) and forall x (Caliginous(x) -> Homing(x)) -> therefore Homing(liliane) Homing(liliane) and forall x (Homing(x) -> Unsociable(x)) -> therefore Unsociable(liliane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Helene is emarginate. Lucine is skinny. Germain is usual. Elvis is skinny. All crank things are usual. If something is frenetic and crank then it is skinny. If something is pillared and emarginate then it is skinny. All crank, usual things are pillared. If something is skinny then it is pillared. If something is pillared then it is crank. Quiet things are usual. If Helene is skinny and Helene is emarginate then Helene is frenetic. Helene is not crank.", "logic": "\nEmarginate(helene)\nSkinny(lucine)\nUsual(germain)\nSkinny(elvis)\nforall x (Crank(x) -> Usual(x))\nforall x (Frenetic(x) and Crank(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Pillared(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Skinny(x))\nforall x (Crank(x) and Usual(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Skinny(x) -> Pillared(x))\nforall x (Pillared(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Frenetic(x) -> Usual(x))\nSkinny(helene) and Emarginate(helene) -> Frenetic(helene)\n\nnot Crank(helene)\n\nforall x (Pillared(x) -> Crank(x)) <- forall x (Skinny(x) -> Pillared(x)) <- forall x (Pillared(x) and Emarginate(x) -> Skinny(x)) <- forall x (Crank(x) and Usual(x) -> Pillared(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Amalie is cogitable. Niven is underfed. Nonna is eight. Valli is underfed. All metric things are eight. If something is syncopated and metric then it is underfed. If something is funky and cogitable then it is underfed. All metric, eight things are funky. If something is underfed then it is funky. If something is funky then it is metric. Quiet things are eight. If Amalie is underfed and Amalie is cogitable then Amalie is syncopated. Amalie is syncopated.", "logic": "\nCogitable(amalie)\nUnderfed(niven)\nEight(nonna)\nUnderfed(valli)\nforall x (Metric(x) -> Eight(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) and Metric(x) -> Underfed(x))\nforall x (Funky(x) and Cogitable(x) -> Underfed(x))\nforall x (Metric(x) and Eight(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Underfed(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Funky(x) -> Metric(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Eight(x))\nUnderfed(amalie) and Cogitable(amalie) -> Syncopated(amalie)\n\nSyncopated(amalie)\n\nUnderfed(amalie) and Cogitable(amalie) -> Syncopated(amalie) <- forall x (Funky(x) and Cogitable(x) -> Underfed(x)) <- forall x (Metric(x) and Eight(x) -> Funky(x)) <- forall x (Funky(x) -> Metric(x)) <- forall x (Underfed(x) -> Funky(x)) <- forall x (Syncopated(x) and Metric(x) -> Underfed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 6, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Merwin is pacifist. Lovell is stupefied. Allianora is executable. Fletch is stupefied. All guttural things are executable. If something is neritic and guttural then it is stupefied. If something is primo and pacifist then it is stupefied. All guttural, executable things are primo. If something is stupefied then it is primo. If something is primo then it is guttural. Quiet things are executable. If Merwin is stupefied and Merwin is pacifist then Merwin is neritic. Allianora is not primo.", "logic": "\nPacifist(merwin)\nStupefied(lovell)\nExecutable(allianora)\nStupefied(fletch)\nforall x (Guttural(x) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Neritic(x) and Guttural(x) -> Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Primo(x) and Pacifist(x) -> Stupefied(x))\nforall x (Guttural(x) and Executable(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Stupefied(x) -> Primo(x))\nforall x (Primo(x) -> Guttural(x))\nforall x (Neritic(x) -> Executable(x))\nStupefied(merwin) and Pacifist(merwin) -> Neritic(merwin)\n\nnot Primo(allianora)\n\nforall x (Guttural(x) and Executable(x) -> Primo(x)) <- forall x (Primo(x) -> Guttural(x)) <- forall x (Stupefied(x) -> Primo(x)) <- forall x (Neritic(x) and Guttural(x) -> Stupefied(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Elmore is bondable. Hiram is cancellous. Stanly is tortured. Morgana is cancellous. All thronged things are tortured. If something is favourable and thronged then it is cancellous. If something is appetising and bondable then it is cancellous. All thronged, tortured things are appetising. If something is cancellous then it is appetising. If something is appetising then it is thronged. Quiet things are tortured. If Elmore is cancellous and Elmore is bondable then Elmore is favourable. Stanly is thronged.", "logic": "\nBondable(elmore)\nCancellous(hiram)\nTortured(stanly)\nCancellous(morgana)\nforall x (Thronged(x) -> Tortured(x))\nforall x (Favourable(x) and Thronged(x) -> Cancellous(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) and Bondable(x) -> Cancellous(x))\nforall x (Thronged(x) and Tortured(x) -> Appetising(x))\nforall x (Cancellous(x) -> Appetising(x))\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Thronged(x))\nforall x (Favourable(x) -> Tortured(x))\nCancellous(elmore) and Bondable(elmore) -> Favourable(elmore)\n\nThronged(stanly)\n\nforall x (Appetising(x) -> Thronged(x)) <- forall x (Cancellous(x) -> Appetising(x)) <- forall x (Favourable(x) and Thronged(x) -> Cancellous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Patel is disklike. Keri is unthought. Frederik is purplish. Alanah is unthought. All inebriated things are purplish. If something is long and inebriated then it is unthought. If something is ocellated and disklike then it is unthought. All inebriated, purplish things are ocellated. If something is unthought then it is ocellated. If something is ocellated then it is inebriated. Quiet things are purplish. If Patel is unthought and Patel is disklike then Patel is long. Keri is not kind.", "logic": "\nDisklike(patel)\nUnthought(keri)\nPurplish(frederik)\nUnthought(alanah)\nforall x (Inebriated(x) -> Purplish(x))\nforall x (Long(x) and Inebriated(x) -> Unthought(x))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) and Disklike(x) -> Unthought(x))\nforall x (Inebriated(x) and Purplish(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Ocellated(x))\nforall x (Ocellated(x) -> Inebriated(x))\nforall x (Long(x) -> Purplish(x))\nUnthought(patel) and Disklike(patel) -> Long(patel)\n\nnot Kind(keri)\n\nnot Kind(keri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Jermain is detailed. Thacher is squeezable. Terrell is stinting. Gennie is squeezable. All stupendous things are stinting. If something is unreactive and stupendous then it is squeezable. If something is answering and detailed then it is squeezable. All stupendous, stinting things are answering. If something is squeezable then it is answering. If something is answering then it is stupendous. Quiet things are stinting. If Jermain is squeezable and Jermain is detailed then Jermain is unreactive. Thacher is unreactive.", "logic": "\nDetailed(jermain)\nSqueezable(thacher)\nStinting(terrell)\nSqueezable(gennie)\nforall x (Stupendous(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Unreactive(x) and Stupendous(x) -> Squeezable(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) and Detailed(x) -> Squeezable(x))\nforall x (Stupendous(x) and Stinting(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Squeezable(x) -> Answering(x))\nforall x (Answering(x) -> Stupendous(x))\nforall x (Unreactive(x) -> Stinting(x))\nSqueezable(jermain) and Detailed(jermain) -> Unreactive(jermain)\n\nUnreactive(thacher)\n\nUnreactive(thacher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Osmond is bronzy. Francesco is aberdonian. Jewelle is acaudal. Thaddius is aberdonian. All unsexy things are acaudal. If something is virtuoso and unsexy then it is aberdonian. If something is grotesque and bronzy then it is aberdonian. All unsexy, acaudal things are grotesque. If something is aberdonian then it is grotesque. If something is grotesque then it is unsexy. Quiet things are acaudal. If Osmond is aberdonian and Osmond is bronzy then Osmond is virtuoso. Francesco is not bronzy.", "logic": "\nBronzy(osmond)\nAberdonian(francesco)\nAcaudal(jewelle)\nAberdonian(thaddius)\nforall x (Unsexy(x) -> Acaudal(x))\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) and Unsexy(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\nforall x (Grotesque(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Aberdonian(x))\nforall x (Unsexy(x) and Acaudal(x) -> Grotesque(x))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Grotesque(x))\nforall x (Grotesque(x) -> Unsexy(x))\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) -> Acaudal(x))\nAberdonian(osmond) and Bronzy(osmond) -> Virtuoso(osmond)\n\nnot Bronzy(francesco)\n\nnot Bronzy(francesco) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "Sherlock is crabwise. Wheeler is monoatomic. Melvin is plumaged. Terencio is monoatomic. All brackish things are plumaged. If something is finer and brackish then it is monoatomic. If something is unswayed and crabwise then it is monoatomic. All brackish, plumaged things are unswayed. If something is monoatomic then it is unswayed. If something is unswayed then it is brackish. Quiet things are plumaged. If Sherlock is monoatomic and Sherlock is crabwise then Sherlock is finer. Terencio is crabwise.", "logic": "\nCrabwise(sherlock)\nMonoatomic(wheeler)\nPlumaged(melvin)\nMonoatomic(terencio)\nforall x (Brackish(x) -> Plumaged(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) and Brackish(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Unswayed(x) and Crabwise(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Brackish(x) and Plumaged(x) -> Unswayed(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Unswayed(x))\nforall x (Unswayed(x) -> Brackish(x))\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Plumaged(x))\nMonoatomic(sherlock) and Crabwise(sherlock) -> Finer(sherlock)\n\nCrabwise(terencio)\n\nCrabwise(terencio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-430"} {"premises": "The marcie wheedle the chicky. The marcie wheedle the hulda. The marcie stack the william. The chicky is heraldist. The chicky is exsanguine. The chicky wheedle the marcie. The chicky shrug the william. The william is brazen. The william wheedle the marcie. The william wheedle the chicky. The william stack the chicky. The hulda is brazen. The hulda wheedle the william. The hulda stack the william. The hulda shrug the marcie. The hulda shrug the william. If the william shrug the marcie then the marcie wheedle the chicky. If the william stack the marcie and the william wheedle the chicky then the chicky is tubed. If something stack the marcie then it is brazen. If something shrug the hulda and it stack the william then it is tubed. If the william stack the chicky then the chicky wheedle the william. If the william shrug the chicky then the william wheedle the marcie. If something wheedle the william then it stack the marcie. If the marcie is heraldist then the marcie wheedle the william. The chicky is exsanguine.", "logic": "\nWheedle(marcie, chicky)\nWheedle(marcie, hulda)\nStack(marcie, william)\nHeraldist(chicky)\nExsanguine(chicky)\nWheedle(chicky, marcie)\nShrug(chicky, william)\nBrazen(william)\nWheedle(william, marcie)\nWheedle(william, chicky)\nStack(william, chicky)\nBrazen(hulda)\nWheedle(hulda, william)\nStack(hulda, william)\nShrug(hulda, marcie)\nShrug(hulda, william)\nShrug(william, marcie) -> Wheedle(marcie, chicky)\nStack(william, marcie) and Wheedle(william, chicky) -> Tubed(chicky)\nforall x (Stack(x, marcie) -> Brazen(x))\nforall x (Shrug(x, hulda) and Stack(x, william) -> Tubed(x))\nStack(william, chicky) -> Wheedle(chicky, william)\nShrug(william, chicky) -> Wheedle(william, marcie)\nforall x (Wheedle(x, william) -> Stack(x, marcie))\nHeraldist(marcie) -> Wheedle(marcie, william)\n\nExsanguine(chicky)\n\ntherefore Exsanguine(chicky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The istvan scupper the hedvig. The istvan scupper the amargo. The istvan derestrict the darin. The hedvig is untried. The hedvig is biweekly. The hedvig scupper the istvan. The hedvig lust the darin. The darin is immoveable. The darin scupper the istvan. The darin scupper the hedvig. The darin derestrict the hedvig. The amargo is immoveable. The amargo scupper the darin. The amargo derestrict the darin. The amargo lust the istvan. The amargo lust the darin. If the darin lust the istvan then the istvan scupper the hedvig. If the darin derestrict the istvan and the darin scupper the hedvig then the hedvig is lxxx. If something derestrict the istvan then it is immoveable. If something lust the amargo and it derestrict the darin then it is lxxx. If the darin derestrict the hedvig then the hedvig scupper the darin. If the darin lust the hedvig then the darin scupper the istvan. If something scupper the darin then it derestrict the istvan. If the istvan is untried then the istvan scupper the darin. The amargo does not need the darin.", "logic": "\nScupper(istvan, hedvig)\nScupper(istvan, amargo)\nDerestrict(istvan, darin)\nUntried(hedvig)\nBiweekly(hedvig)\nScupper(hedvig, istvan)\nLust(hedvig, darin)\nImmoveable(darin)\nScupper(darin, istvan)\nScupper(darin, hedvig)\nDerestrict(darin, hedvig)\nImmoveable(amargo)\nScupper(amargo, darin)\nDerestrict(amargo, darin)\nLust(amargo, istvan)\nLust(amargo, darin)\nLust(darin, istvan) -> Scupper(istvan, hedvig)\nDerestrict(darin, istvan) and Scupper(darin, hedvig) -> Lxxx(hedvig)\nforall x (Derestrict(x, istvan) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Lust(x, amargo) and Derestrict(x, darin) -> Lxxx(x))\nDerestrict(darin, hedvig) -> Scupper(hedvig, darin)\nLust(darin, hedvig) -> Scupper(darin, istvan)\nforall x (Scupper(x, darin) -> Derestrict(x, istvan))\nUntried(istvan) -> Scupper(istvan, darin)\n\nnot Scupper(amargo, darin)\n\ntherefore Scupper(amargo, darin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The obadias motorize the martelle. The obadias motorize the bertrand. The obadias regulate the brita. The martelle is staminate. The martelle is unmingled. The martelle motorize the obadias. The martelle despoil the brita. The brita is yonder. The brita motorize the obadias. The brita motorize the martelle. The brita regulate the martelle. The bertrand is yonder. The bertrand motorize the brita. The bertrand regulate the brita. The bertrand despoil the obadias. The bertrand despoil the brita. If the brita despoil the obadias then the obadias motorize the martelle. If the brita regulate the obadias and the brita motorize the martelle then the martelle is dotty. If something regulate the obadias then it is yonder. If something despoil the bertrand and it regulate the brita then it is dotty. If the brita regulate the martelle then the martelle motorize the brita. If the brita despoil the martelle then the brita motorize the obadias. If something motorize the brita then it regulate the obadias. If the obadias is staminate then the obadias motorize the brita. The martelle motorize the brita.", "logic": "\nMotorize(obadias, martelle)\nMotorize(obadias, bertrand)\nRegulate(obadias, brita)\nStaminate(martelle)\nUnmingled(martelle)\nMotorize(martelle, obadias)\nDespoil(martelle, brita)\nYonder(brita)\nMotorize(brita, obadias)\nMotorize(brita, martelle)\nRegulate(brita, martelle)\nYonder(bertrand)\nMotorize(bertrand, brita)\nRegulate(bertrand, brita)\nDespoil(bertrand, obadias)\nDespoil(bertrand, brita)\nDespoil(brita, obadias) -> Motorize(obadias, martelle)\nRegulate(brita, obadias) and Motorize(brita, martelle) -> Dotty(martelle)\nforall x (Regulate(x, obadias) -> Yonder(x))\nforall x (Despoil(x, bertrand) and Regulate(x, brita) -> Dotty(x))\nRegulate(brita, martelle) -> Motorize(martelle, brita)\nDespoil(brita, martelle) -> Motorize(brita, obadias)\nforall x (Motorize(x, brita) -> Regulate(x, obadias))\nStaminate(obadias) -> Motorize(obadias, brita)\n\nMotorize(martelle, brita)\n\nRegulate(brita, martelle) and Regulate(brita, martelle) -> Motorize(martelle, brita) -> therefore Motorize(martelle, brita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The michelina fort the rufus. The michelina fort the timotheus. The michelina further the hetti. The rufus is untipped. The rufus is apropos. The rufus fort the michelina. The rufus relish the hetti. The hetti is garmented. The hetti fort the michelina. The hetti fort the rufus. The hetti further the rufus. The timotheus is garmented. The timotheus fort the hetti. The timotheus further the hetti. The timotheus relish the michelina. The timotheus relish the hetti. If the hetti relish the michelina then the michelina fort the rufus. If the hetti further the michelina and the hetti fort the rufus then the rufus is flat. If something further the michelina then it is garmented. If something relish the timotheus and it further the hetti then it is flat. If the hetti further the rufus then the rufus fort the hetti. If the hetti relish the rufus then the hetti fort the michelina. If something fort the hetti then it further the michelina. If the michelina is untipped then the michelina fort the hetti. The timotheus does not see the michelina.", "logic": "\nFort(michelina, rufus)\nFort(michelina, timotheus)\nFurther(michelina, hetti)\nUntipped(rufus)\nApropos(rufus)\nFort(rufus, michelina)\nRelish(rufus, hetti)\nGarmented(hetti)\nFort(hetti, michelina)\nFort(hetti, rufus)\nFurther(hetti, rufus)\nGarmented(timotheus)\nFort(timotheus, hetti)\nFurther(timotheus, hetti)\nRelish(timotheus, michelina)\nRelish(timotheus, hetti)\nRelish(hetti, michelina) -> Fort(michelina, rufus)\nFurther(hetti, michelina) and Fort(hetti, rufus) -> Flat(rufus)\nforall x (Further(x, michelina) -> Garmented(x))\nforall x (Relish(x, timotheus) and Further(x, hetti) -> Flat(x))\nFurther(hetti, rufus) -> Fort(rufus, hetti)\nRelish(hetti, rufus) -> Fort(hetti, michelina)\nforall x (Fort(x, hetti) -> Further(x, michelina))\nUntipped(michelina) -> Fort(michelina, hetti)\n\nnot Further(timotheus, michelina)\n\nFort(timotheus, hetti) and forall x (Fort(x, hetti) -> Further(x, michelina)) -> therefore Further(timotheus, michelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The hilliard formicate the tessie. The hilliard formicate the jeanna. The hilliard forward the lenore. The tessie is loamless. The tessie is sleepless. The tessie formicate the hilliard. The tessie rummage the lenore. The lenore is unhoped. The lenore formicate the hilliard. The lenore formicate the tessie. The lenore forward the tessie. The jeanna is unhoped. The jeanna formicate the lenore. The jeanna forward the lenore. The jeanna rummage the hilliard. The jeanna rummage the lenore. If the lenore rummage the hilliard then the hilliard formicate the tessie. If the lenore forward the hilliard and the lenore formicate the tessie then the tessie is vaporific. If something forward the hilliard then it is unhoped. If something rummage the jeanna and it forward the lenore then it is vaporific. If the lenore forward the tessie then the tessie formicate the lenore. If the lenore rummage the tessie then the lenore formicate the hilliard. If something formicate the lenore then it forward the hilliard. If the hilliard is loamless then the hilliard formicate the lenore. The tessie forward the hilliard.", "logic": "\nFormicate(hilliard, tessie)\nFormicate(hilliard, jeanna)\nForward(hilliard, lenore)\nLoamless(tessie)\nSleepless(tessie)\nFormicate(tessie, hilliard)\nRummage(tessie, lenore)\nUnhoped(lenore)\nFormicate(lenore, hilliard)\nFormicate(lenore, tessie)\nForward(lenore, tessie)\nUnhoped(jeanna)\nFormicate(jeanna, lenore)\nForward(jeanna, lenore)\nRummage(jeanna, hilliard)\nRummage(jeanna, lenore)\nRummage(lenore, hilliard) -> Formicate(hilliard, tessie)\nForward(lenore, hilliard) and Formicate(lenore, tessie) -> Vaporific(tessie)\nforall x (Forward(x, hilliard) -> Unhoped(x))\nforall x (Rummage(x, jeanna) and Forward(x, lenore) -> Vaporific(x))\nForward(lenore, tessie) -> Formicate(tessie, lenore)\nRummage(lenore, tessie) -> Formicate(lenore, hilliard)\nforall x (Formicate(x, lenore) -> Forward(x, hilliard))\nLoamless(hilliard) -> Formicate(hilliard, lenore)\n\nForward(tessie, hilliard)\n\nForward(lenore, tessie) and Forward(lenore, tessie) -> Formicate(tessie, lenore) -> therefore Formicate(tessie, lenore) Formicate(tessie, lenore) and forall x (Formicate(x, lenore) -> Forward(x, hilliard)) -> therefore Forward(tessie, hilliard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The talya cleanse the bernetta. The talya cleanse the dewitt. The talya potter the templeton. The bernetta is deceased. The bernetta is stringent. The bernetta cleanse the talya. The bernetta brad the templeton. The templeton is unsuitable. The templeton cleanse the talya. The templeton cleanse the bernetta. The templeton potter the bernetta. The dewitt is unsuitable. The dewitt cleanse the templeton. The dewitt potter the templeton. The dewitt brad the talya. The dewitt brad the templeton. If the templeton brad the talya then the talya cleanse the bernetta. If the templeton potter the talya and the templeton cleanse the bernetta then the bernetta is falling. If something potter the talya then it is unsuitable. If something brad the dewitt and it potter the templeton then it is falling. If the templeton potter the bernetta then the bernetta cleanse the templeton. If the templeton brad the bernetta then the templeton cleanse the talya. If something cleanse the templeton then it potter the talya. If the talya is deceased then the talya cleanse the templeton. The bernetta does not see the talya.", "logic": "\nCleanse(talya, bernetta)\nCleanse(talya, dewitt)\nPotter(talya, templeton)\nDeceased(bernetta)\nStringent(bernetta)\nCleanse(bernetta, talya)\nBrad(bernetta, templeton)\nUnsuitable(templeton)\nCleanse(templeton, talya)\nCleanse(templeton, bernetta)\nPotter(templeton, bernetta)\nUnsuitable(dewitt)\nCleanse(dewitt, templeton)\nPotter(dewitt, templeton)\nBrad(dewitt, talya)\nBrad(dewitt, templeton)\nBrad(templeton, talya) -> Cleanse(talya, bernetta)\nPotter(templeton, talya) and Cleanse(templeton, bernetta) -> Falling(bernetta)\nforall x (Potter(x, talya) -> Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Brad(x, dewitt) and Potter(x, templeton) -> Falling(x))\nPotter(templeton, bernetta) -> Cleanse(bernetta, templeton)\nBrad(templeton, bernetta) -> Cleanse(templeton, talya)\nforall x (Cleanse(x, templeton) -> Potter(x, talya))\nDeceased(talya) -> Cleanse(talya, templeton)\n\nnot Potter(bernetta, talya)\n\nPotter(templeton, bernetta) and Potter(templeton, bernetta) -> Cleanse(bernetta, templeton) -> therefore Cleanse(bernetta, templeton) Cleanse(bernetta, templeton) and forall x (Cleanse(x, templeton) -> Potter(x, talya)) -> therefore Potter(bernetta, talya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The clare stumble the nanete. The clare stumble the rudolfo. The clare redeem the meredithe. The nanete is zonary. The nanete is colonic. The nanete stumble the clare. The nanete sentence the meredithe. The meredithe is recovering. The meredithe stumble the clare. The meredithe stumble the nanete. The meredithe redeem the nanete. The rudolfo is recovering. The rudolfo stumble the meredithe. The rudolfo redeem the meredithe. The rudolfo sentence the clare. The rudolfo sentence the meredithe. If the meredithe sentence the clare then the clare stumble the nanete. If the meredithe redeem the clare and the meredithe stumble the nanete then the nanete is centric. If something redeem the clare then it is recovering. If something sentence the rudolfo and it redeem the meredithe then it is centric. If the meredithe redeem the nanete then the nanete stumble the meredithe. If the meredithe sentence the nanete then the meredithe stumble the clare. If something stumble the meredithe then it redeem the clare. If the clare is zonary then the clare stumble the meredithe. The nanete is recovering.", "logic": "\nStumble(clare, nanete)\nStumble(clare, rudolfo)\nRedeem(clare, meredithe)\nZonary(nanete)\nColonic(nanete)\nStumble(nanete, clare)\nSentence(nanete, meredithe)\nRecovering(meredithe)\nStumble(meredithe, clare)\nStumble(meredithe, nanete)\nRedeem(meredithe, nanete)\nRecovering(rudolfo)\nStumble(rudolfo, meredithe)\nRedeem(rudolfo, meredithe)\nSentence(rudolfo, clare)\nSentence(rudolfo, meredithe)\nSentence(meredithe, clare) -> Stumble(clare, nanete)\nRedeem(meredithe, clare) and Stumble(meredithe, nanete) -> Centric(nanete)\nforall x (Redeem(x, clare) -> Recovering(x))\nforall x (Sentence(x, rudolfo) and Redeem(x, meredithe) -> Centric(x))\nRedeem(meredithe, nanete) -> Stumble(nanete, meredithe)\nSentence(meredithe, nanete) -> Stumble(meredithe, clare)\nforall x (Stumble(x, meredithe) -> Redeem(x, clare))\nZonary(clare) -> Stumble(clare, meredithe)\n\nRecovering(nanete)\n\nRedeem(meredithe, nanete) and Redeem(meredithe, nanete) -> Stumble(nanete, meredithe) -> therefore Stumble(nanete, meredithe) Stumble(nanete, meredithe) and forall x (Stumble(x, meredithe) -> Redeem(x, clare)) -> therefore Redeem(nanete, clare) Redeem(nanete, clare) and forall x (Redeem(x, clare) -> Recovering(x)) -> therefore Recovering(nanete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The logical pillory the pen. The logical pillory the cindi. The logical rick the andie. The pen is woebegone. The pen is biaxate. The pen pillory the logical. The pen stylise the andie. The andie is logical. The andie pillory the logical. The andie pillory the pen. The andie rick the pen. The cindi is logical. The cindi pillory the andie. The cindi rick the andie. The cindi stylise the logical. The cindi stylise the andie. If the andie stylise the logical then the logical pillory the pen. If the andie rick the logical and the andie pillory the pen then the pen is turbinate. If something rick the logical then it is logical. If something stylise the cindi and it rick the andie then it is turbinate. If the andie rick the pen then the pen pillory the andie. If the andie stylise the pen then the andie pillory the logical. If something pillory the andie then it rick the logical. If the logical is woebegone then the logical pillory the andie. The pen is not logical.", "logic": "\nPillory(red, pen)\nPillory(red, cindi)\nRick(red, andie)\nWoebegone(pen)\nBiaxate(pen)\nPillory(pen, red)\nStylise(pen, andie)\nLogical(andie)\nPillory(andie, red)\nPillory(andie, pen)\nRick(andie, pen)\nLogical(cindi)\nPillory(cindi, andie)\nRick(cindi, andie)\nStylise(cindi, red)\nStylise(cindi, andie)\nStylise(andie, red) -> Pillory(red, pen)\nRick(andie, red) and Pillory(andie, pen) -> Turbinate(pen)\nforall x (Rick(x, red) -> Logical(x))\nforall x (Stylise(x, cindi) and Rick(x, andie) -> Turbinate(x))\nRick(andie, pen) -> Pillory(pen, andie)\nStylise(andie, pen) -> Pillory(andie, red)\nforall x (Pillory(x, andie) -> Rick(x, red))\nWoebegone(red) -> Pillory(red, andie)\n\nnot Logical(pen)\n\nRick(andie, pen) and Rick(andie, pen) -> Pillory(pen, andie) -> therefore Pillory(pen, andie) Pillory(pen, andie) and forall x (Pillory(x, andie) -> Rick(x, red)) -> therefore Rick(pen, red) Rick(pen, red) and forall x (Rick(x, red) -> Logical(x)) -> therefore Logical(pen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The stu inhale the devinne. The stu inhale the tad. The stu pestle the walter. The devinne is bungling. The devinne is soured. The devinne inhale the stu. The devinne flare the walter. The walter is accusative. The walter inhale the stu. The walter inhale the devinne. The walter pestle the devinne. The tad is accusative. The tad inhale the walter. The tad pestle the walter. The tad flare the stu. The tad flare the walter. If the walter flare the stu then the stu inhale the devinne. If the walter pestle the stu and the walter inhale the devinne then the devinne is returning. If something pestle the stu then it is accusative. If something flare the tad and it pestle the walter then it is returning. If the walter pestle the devinne then the devinne inhale the walter. If the walter flare the devinne then the walter inhale the stu. If something inhale the walter then it pestle the stu. If the stu is bungling then the stu inhale the walter. The walter does not see the stu.", "logic": "\nInhale(stu, devinne)\nInhale(stu, tad)\nPestle(stu, walter)\nBungling(devinne)\nSoured(devinne)\nInhale(devinne, stu)\nFlare(devinne, walter)\nAccusative(walter)\nInhale(walter, stu)\nInhale(walter, devinne)\nPestle(walter, devinne)\nAccusative(tad)\nInhale(tad, walter)\nPestle(tad, walter)\nFlare(tad, stu)\nFlare(tad, walter)\nFlare(walter, stu) -> Inhale(stu, devinne)\nPestle(walter, stu) and Inhale(walter, devinne) -> Returning(devinne)\nforall x (Pestle(x, stu) -> Accusative(x))\nforall x (Flare(x, tad) and Pestle(x, walter) -> Returning(x))\nPestle(walter, devinne) -> Inhale(devinne, walter)\nFlare(walter, devinne) -> Inhale(walter, stu)\nforall x (Inhale(x, walter) -> Pestle(x, stu))\nBungling(stu) -> Inhale(stu, walter)\n\nnot Pestle(walter, stu)\n\nforall x (Inhale(x, walter) -> Pestle(x, stu)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The fredi indenture the kirstie. The fredi indenture the larina. The fredi disenable the adrianne. The kirstie is indigenous. The kirstie is palatal. The kirstie indenture the fredi. The kirstie caravan the adrianne. The adrianne is bottomless. The adrianne indenture the fredi. The adrianne indenture the kirstie. The adrianne disenable the kirstie. The larina is bottomless. The larina indenture the adrianne. The larina disenable the adrianne. The larina caravan the fredi. The larina caravan the adrianne. If the adrianne caravan the fredi then the fredi indenture the kirstie. If the adrianne disenable the fredi and the adrianne indenture the kirstie then the kirstie is iranian. If something disenable the fredi then it is bottomless. If something caravan the larina and it disenable the adrianne then it is iranian. If the adrianne disenable the kirstie then the kirstie indenture the adrianne. If the adrianne caravan the kirstie then the adrianne indenture the fredi. If something indenture the adrianne then it disenable the fredi. If the fredi is indigenous then the fredi indenture the adrianne. The fredi is bottomless.", "logic": "\nIndenture(fredi, kirstie)\nIndenture(fredi, larina)\nDisenable(fredi, adrianne)\nIndigenous(kirstie)\nPalatal(kirstie)\nIndenture(kirstie, fredi)\nCaravan(kirstie, adrianne)\nBottomless(adrianne)\nIndenture(adrianne, fredi)\nIndenture(adrianne, kirstie)\nDisenable(adrianne, kirstie)\nBottomless(larina)\nIndenture(larina, adrianne)\nDisenable(larina, adrianne)\nCaravan(larina, fredi)\nCaravan(larina, adrianne)\nCaravan(adrianne, fredi) -> Indenture(fredi, kirstie)\nDisenable(adrianne, fredi) and Indenture(adrianne, kirstie) -> Iranian(kirstie)\nforall x (Disenable(x, fredi) -> Bottomless(x))\nforall x (Caravan(x, larina) and Disenable(x, adrianne) -> Iranian(x))\nDisenable(adrianne, kirstie) -> Indenture(kirstie, adrianne)\nCaravan(adrianne, kirstie) -> Indenture(adrianne, fredi)\nforall x (Indenture(x, adrianne) -> Disenable(x, fredi))\nIndigenous(fredi) -> Indenture(fredi, adrianne)\n\nBottomless(fredi)\n\nforall x (Disenable(x, fredi) -> Bottomless(x)) <- forall x (Indenture(x, adrianne) -> Disenable(x, fredi)) <- Indigenous(fredi) -> Indenture(fredi, adrianne) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The brynne higgle the christine. The brynne higgle the shay. The brynne pollenate the bernard. The christine is coronary. The christine is adverse. The christine higgle the brynne. The christine overdo the bernard. The bernard is patchy. The bernard higgle the brynne. The bernard higgle the christine. The bernard pollenate the christine. The shay is patchy. The shay higgle the bernard. The shay pollenate the bernard. The shay overdo the brynne. The shay overdo the bernard. If the bernard overdo the brynne then the brynne higgle the christine. If the bernard pollenate the brynne and the bernard higgle the christine then the christine is matutinal. If something pollenate the brynne then it is patchy. If something overdo the shay and it pollenate the bernard then it is matutinal. If the bernard pollenate the christine then the christine higgle the bernard. If the bernard overdo the christine then the bernard higgle the brynne. If something higgle the bernard then it pollenate the brynne. If the brynne is coronary then the brynne higgle the bernard. The christine is not matutinal.", "logic": "\nHiggle(brynne, christine)\nHiggle(brynne, shay)\nPollenate(brynne, bernard)\nCoronary(christine)\nAdverse(christine)\nHiggle(christine, brynne)\nOverdo(christine, bernard)\nPatchy(bernard)\nHiggle(bernard, brynne)\nHiggle(bernard, christine)\nPollenate(bernard, christine)\nPatchy(shay)\nHiggle(shay, bernard)\nPollenate(shay, bernard)\nOverdo(shay, brynne)\nOverdo(shay, bernard)\nOverdo(bernard, brynne) -> Higgle(brynne, christine)\nPollenate(bernard, brynne) and Higgle(bernard, christine) -> Matutinal(christine)\nforall x (Pollenate(x, brynne) -> Patchy(x))\nforall x (Overdo(x, shay) and Pollenate(x, bernard) -> Matutinal(x))\nPollenate(bernard, christine) -> Higgle(christine, bernard)\nOverdo(bernard, christine) -> Higgle(bernard, brynne)\nforall x (Higgle(x, bernard) -> Pollenate(x, brynne))\nCoronary(brynne) -> Higgle(brynne, bernard)\n\nnot Matutinal(christine)\n\nPollenate(bernard, brynne) and Higgle(bernard, christine) -> Matutinal(christine) <- forall x (Higgle(x, bernard) -> Pollenate(x, brynne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The terrie tithe the chevalier. The terrie tithe the nanny. The terrie festinate the bay. The chevalier is gaudy. The chevalier is penumbral. The chevalier tithe the terrie. The chevalier mummify the bay. The bay is symphonic. The bay tithe the terrie. The bay tithe the chevalier. The bay festinate the chevalier. The nanny is symphonic. The nanny tithe the bay. The nanny festinate the bay. The nanny mummify the terrie. The nanny mummify the bay. If the bay mummify the terrie then the terrie tithe the chevalier. If the bay festinate the terrie and the bay tithe the chevalier then the chevalier is neandertal. If something festinate the terrie then it is symphonic. If something mummify the nanny and it festinate the bay then it is neandertal. If the bay festinate the chevalier then the chevalier tithe the bay. If the bay mummify the chevalier then the bay tithe the terrie. If something tithe the bay then it festinate the terrie. If the terrie is gaudy then the terrie tithe the bay. The bay is neandertal.", "logic": "\nTithe(terrie, chevalier)\nTithe(terrie, nanny)\nFestinate(terrie, bay)\nGaudy(chevalier)\nPenumbral(chevalier)\nTithe(chevalier, terrie)\nMummify(chevalier, bay)\nSymphonic(bay)\nTithe(bay, terrie)\nTithe(bay, chevalier)\nFestinate(bay, chevalier)\nSymphonic(nanny)\nTithe(nanny, bay)\nFestinate(nanny, bay)\nMummify(nanny, terrie)\nMummify(nanny, bay)\nMummify(bay, terrie) -> Tithe(terrie, chevalier)\nFestinate(bay, terrie) and Tithe(bay, chevalier) -> Neandertal(chevalier)\nforall x (Festinate(x, terrie) -> Symphonic(x))\nforall x (Mummify(x, nanny) and Festinate(x, bay) -> Neandertal(x))\nFestinate(bay, chevalier) -> Tithe(chevalier, bay)\nMummify(bay, chevalier) -> Tithe(bay, terrie)\nforall x (Tithe(x, bay) -> Festinate(x, terrie))\nGaudy(terrie) -> Tithe(terrie, bay)\n\nNeandertal(bay)\n\nforall x (Mummify(x, nanny) and Festinate(x, bay) -> Neandertal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The novelia apperceive the elsinore. The novelia apperceive the shanda. The novelia fetishize the blithe. The elsinore is nitric. The elsinore is eared. The elsinore apperceive the novelia. The elsinore curse the blithe. The blithe is collect. The blithe apperceive the novelia. The blithe apperceive the elsinore. The blithe fetishize the elsinore. The shanda is collect. The shanda apperceive the blithe. The shanda fetishize the blithe. The shanda curse the novelia. The shanda curse the blithe. If the blithe curse the novelia then the novelia apperceive the elsinore. If the blithe fetishize the novelia and the blithe apperceive the elsinore then the elsinore is resonating. If something fetishize the novelia then it is collect. If something curse the shanda and it fetishize the blithe then it is resonating. If the blithe fetishize the elsinore then the elsinore apperceive the blithe. If the blithe curse the elsinore then the blithe apperceive the novelia. If something apperceive the blithe then it fetishize the novelia. If the novelia is nitric then the novelia apperceive the blithe. The elsinore does not see the elsinore.", "logic": "\nApperceive(novelia, elsinore)\nApperceive(novelia, shanda)\nFetishize(novelia, blithe)\nNitric(elsinore)\nEared(elsinore)\nApperceive(elsinore, novelia)\nCurse(elsinore, blithe)\nCollect(blithe)\nApperceive(blithe, novelia)\nApperceive(blithe, elsinore)\nFetishize(blithe, elsinore)\nCollect(shanda)\nApperceive(shanda, blithe)\nFetishize(shanda, blithe)\nCurse(shanda, novelia)\nCurse(shanda, blithe)\nCurse(blithe, novelia) -> Apperceive(novelia, elsinore)\nFetishize(blithe, novelia) and Apperceive(blithe, elsinore) -> Resonating(elsinore)\nforall x (Fetishize(x, novelia) -> Collect(x))\nforall x (Curse(x, shanda) and Fetishize(x, blithe) -> Resonating(x))\nFetishize(blithe, elsinore) -> Apperceive(elsinore, blithe)\nCurse(blithe, elsinore) -> Apperceive(blithe, novelia)\nforall x (Apperceive(x, blithe) -> Fetishize(x, novelia))\nNitric(novelia) -> Apperceive(novelia, blithe)\n\nnot Fetishize(elsinore, elsinore)\n\nnot Fetishize(elsinore, elsinore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The tobit favour the rodi. The tobit favour the monica. The tobit stale the erna. The rodi is bulky. The rodi is covert. The rodi favour the tobit. The rodi cosponsor the erna. The erna is diploid. The erna favour the tobit. The erna favour the rodi. The erna stale the rodi. The monica is diploid. The monica favour the erna. The monica stale the erna. The monica cosponsor the tobit. The monica cosponsor the erna. If the erna cosponsor the tobit then the tobit favour the rodi. If the erna stale the tobit and the erna favour the rodi then the rodi is fledgeless. If something stale the tobit then it is diploid. If something cosponsor the monica and it stale the erna then it is fledgeless. If the erna stale the rodi then the rodi favour the erna. If the erna cosponsor the rodi then the erna favour the tobit. If something favour the erna then it stale the tobit. If the tobit is bulky then the tobit favour the erna. The tobit stale the monica.", "logic": "\nFavour(tobit, rodi)\nFavour(tobit, monica)\nStale(tobit, erna)\nBulky(rodi)\nCovert(rodi)\nFavour(rodi, tobit)\nCosponsor(rodi, erna)\nDiploid(erna)\nFavour(erna, tobit)\nFavour(erna, rodi)\nStale(erna, rodi)\nDiploid(monica)\nFavour(monica, erna)\nStale(monica, erna)\nCosponsor(monica, tobit)\nCosponsor(monica, erna)\nCosponsor(erna, tobit) -> Favour(tobit, rodi)\nStale(erna, tobit) and Favour(erna, rodi) -> Fledgeless(rodi)\nforall x (Stale(x, tobit) -> Diploid(x))\nforall x (Cosponsor(x, monica) and Stale(x, erna) -> Fledgeless(x))\nStale(erna, rodi) -> Favour(rodi, erna)\nCosponsor(erna, rodi) -> Favour(erna, tobit)\nforall x (Favour(x, erna) -> Stale(x, tobit))\nBulky(tobit) -> Favour(tobit, erna)\n\nStale(tobit, monica)\n\nStale(tobit, monica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The reynolds detract the elysee. The reynolds detract the natassia. The reynolds trust the ninnette. The elysee is vaporous. The elysee is ragged. The elysee detract the reynolds. The elysee scurry the ninnette. The ninnette is hispanic. The ninnette detract the reynolds. The ninnette detract the elysee. The ninnette trust the elysee. The natassia is hispanic. The natassia detract the ninnette. The natassia trust the ninnette. The natassia scurry the reynolds. The natassia scurry the ninnette. If the ninnette scurry the reynolds then the reynolds detract the elysee. If the ninnette trust the reynolds and the ninnette detract the elysee then the elysee is adonic. If something trust the reynolds then it is hispanic. If something scurry the natassia and it trust the ninnette then it is adonic. If the ninnette trust the elysee then the elysee detract the ninnette. If the ninnette scurry the elysee then the ninnette detract the reynolds. If something detract the ninnette then it trust the reynolds. If the reynolds is vaporous then the reynolds detract the ninnette. The ninnette does not visit the reynolds.", "logic": "\nDetract(reynolds, elysee)\nDetract(reynolds, natassia)\nTrust(reynolds, ninnette)\nVaporous(elysee)\nRagged(elysee)\nDetract(elysee, reynolds)\nScurry(elysee, ninnette)\nHispanic(ninnette)\nDetract(ninnette, reynolds)\nDetract(ninnette, elysee)\nTrust(ninnette, elysee)\nHispanic(natassia)\nDetract(natassia, ninnette)\nTrust(natassia, ninnette)\nScurry(natassia, reynolds)\nScurry(natassia, ninnette)\nScurry(ninnette, reynolds) -> Detract(reynolds, elysee)\nTrust(ninnette, reynolds) and Detract(ninnette, elysee) -> Adonic(elysee)\nforall x (Trust(x, reynolds) -> Hispanic(x))\nforall x (Scurry(x, natassia) and Trust(x, ninnette) -> Adonic(x))\nTrust(ninnette, elysee) -> Detract(elysee, ninnette)\nScurry(ninnette, elysee) -> Detract(ninnette, reynolds)\nforall x (Detract(x, ninnette) -> Trust(x, reynolds))\nVaporous(reynolds) -> Detract(reynolds, ninnette)\n\nnot Scurry(ninnette, reynolds)\n\nnot Scurry(ninnette, reynolds) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "The godfry aberrate the josefina. The godfry aberrate the adah. The godfry jaundice the benito. The josefina is shrieked. The josefina is religious. The josefina aberrate the godfry. The josefina officer the benito. The benito is quickset. The benito aberrate the godfry. The benito aberrate the josefina. The benito jaundice the josefina. The adah is quickset. The adah aberrate the benito. The adah jaundice the benito. The adah officer the godfry. The adah officer the benito. If the benito officer the godfry then the godfry aberrate the josefina. If the benito jaundice the godfry and the benito aberrate the josefina then the josefina is unoriented. If something jaundice the godfry then it is quickset. If something officer the adah and it jaundice the benito then it is unoriented. If the benito jaundice the josefina then the josefina aberrate the benito. If the benito officer the josefina then the benito aberrate the godfry. If something aberrate the benito then it jaundice the godfry. If the godfry is shrieked then the godfry aberrate the benito. The benito jaundice the adah.", "logic": "\nAberrate(godfry, josefina)\nAberrate(godfry, adah)\nJaundice(godfry, benito)\nShrieked(josefina)\nReligious(josefina)\nAberrate(josefina, godfry)\nOfficer(josefina, benito)\nQuickset(benito)\nAberrate(benito, godfry)\nAberrate(benito, josefina)\nJaundice(benito, josefina)\nQuickset(adah)\nAberrate(adah, benito)\nJaundice(adah, benito)\nOfficer(adah, godfry)\nOfficer(adah, benito)\nOfficer(benito, godfry) -> Aberrate(godfry, josefina)\nJaundice(benito, godfry) and Aberrate(benito, josefina) -> Unoriented(josefina)\nforall x (Jaundice(x, godfry) -> Quickset(x))\nforall x (Officer(x, adah) and Jaundice(x, benito) -> Unoriented(x))\nJaundice(benito, josefina) -> Aberrate(josefina, benito)\nOfficer(benito, josefina) -> Aberrate(benito, godfry)\nforall x (Aberrate(x, benito) -> Jaundice(x, godfry))\nShrieked(godfry) -> Aberrate(godfry, benito)\n\nJaundice(benito, adah)\n\nJaundice(benito, adah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1589"} {"premises": "Waly is aeriform. Waly is anatropous. Waly is creaseless. Quiet, aeriform things are victimised. Cold, anatropous things are creaseless. Waly is anatropous.", "logic": "\nAeriform(waly)\nAnatropous(waly)\nCreaseless(waly)\nforall x (Anatropous(x) and Aeriform(x) -> Victimised(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) and Anatropous(x) -> Creaseless(x))\n\nAnatropous(waly)\n\ntherefore Anatropous(waly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3652"} {"premises": "Sam is baptistic. Sam is mistakable. Sam is diverted. Quiet, baptistic things are bygone. Cold, mistakable things are diverted. Sam is not mistakable.", "logic": "\nBaptistic(sam)\nMistakable(sam)\nDiverted(sam)\nforall x (Mistakable(x) and Baptistic(x) -> Bygone(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Mistakable(x) -> Diverted(x))\n\nnot Mistakable(sam)\n\ntherefore Mistakable(sam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3652"} {"premises": "Web is aimless. Web is semisweet. Web is biracial. Quiet, aimless things are refined. Cold, semisweet things are biracial. Web is not nice.", "logic": "\nAimless(web)\nSemisweet(web)\nBiracial(web)\nforall x (Semisweet(x) and Aimless(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Aimless(x) and Semisweet(x) -> Biracial(x))\n\nnot Nice(web)\n\nnot Nice(web) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3652"} {"premises": "Dennis is voluptuary. Dennis is glaswegian. Dennis is undomestic. Quiet, voluptuary things are poetic. Cold, glaswegian things are undomestic. Dennis is white.", "logic": "\nVoluptuary(dennis)\nGlaswegian(dennis)\nUndomestic(dennis)\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) and Voluptuary(x) -> Poetic(x))\nforall x (Voluptuary(x) and Glaswegian(x) -> Undomestic(x))\n\nWhite(dennis)\n\nWhite(dennis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3652"} {"premises": "Sibbie is rangy. Cold people are assured. If someone is sunburned then they are maledict. White people are maledict. If Sibbie is tall and Sibbie is rangy then Sibbie is not maledict. If Sibbie is sunburned and Sibbie is assured then Sibbie is wieldy. White people are sunburned. If Sibbie is not maledict and Sibbie is not wieldy then Sibbie is victorian. If Sibbie is tall and Sibbie is sunburned then Sibbie is not victorian. Sibbie is rangy.", "logic": "\nRangy(sibbie)\nforall x (Maledict(x) -> Assured(x))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> Maledict(x))\nTall(sibbie) and Rangy(sibbie) -> not Maledict(sibbie)\nSunburned(sibbie) and Assured(sibbie) -> Wieldy(sibbie)\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> Sunburned(x))\nnot Maledict(sibbie) and not Wieldy(sibbie) -> Victorian(sibbie)\nTall(sibbie) and Sunburned(sibbie) -> not Victorian(sibbie)\n\nRangy(sibbie)\n\ntherefore Rangy(sibbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Joya is composed. Cold people are tidy. If someone is corked then they are endermic. White people are endermic. If Joya is yucky and Joya is composed then Joya is not endermic. If Joya is corked and Joya is tidy then Joya is sufferable. White people are corked. If Joya is not endermic and Joya is not sufferable then Joya is astute. If Joya is yucky and Joya is corked then Joya is not astute. Joya is not composed.", "logic": "\nComposed(joya)\nforall x (Endermic(x) -> Tidy(x))\nforall x (Corked(x) -> Endermic(x))\nforall x (Composed(x) -> Endermic(x))\nYucky(joya) and Composed(joya) -> not Endermic(joya)\nCorked(joya) and Tidy(joya) -> Sufferable(joya)\nforall x (Composed(x) -> Corked(x))\nnot Endermic(joya) and not Sufferable(joya) -> Astute(joya)\nYucky(joya) and Corked(joya) -> not Astute(joya)\n\nnot Composed(joya)\n\ntherefore Composed(joya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Eirena is deltoid. Cold people are unlocated. If someone is tramontane then they are sericeous. White people are sericeous. If Eirena is theist and Eirena is deltoid then Eirena is not sericeous. If Eirena is tramontane and Eirena is unlocated then Eirena is enclosed. White people are tramontane. If Eirena is not sericeous and Eirena is not enclosed then Eirena is indonesian. If Eirena is theist and Eirena is tramontane then Eirena is not indonesian. Eirena is sericeous.", "logic": "\nDeltoid(eirena)\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Tramontane(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nTheist(eirena) and Deltoid(eirena) -> not Sericeous(eirena)\nTramontane(eirena) and Unlocated(eirena) -> Enclosed(eirena)\nforall x (Deltoid(x) -> Tramontane(x))\nnot Sericeous(eirena) and not Enclosed(eirena) -> Indonesian(eirena)\nTheist(eirena) and Tramontane(eirena) -> not Indonesian(eirena)\n\nSericeous(eirena)\n\nDeltoid(eirena) and forall x (Deltoid(x) -> Sericeous(x)) -> therefore Sericeous(eirena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Derick is hooked. Cold people are demoniacal. If someone is bilateral then they are leguminous. White people are leguminous. If Derick is manifest and Derick is hooked then Derick is not leguminous. If Derick is bilateral and Derick is demoniacal then Derick is fungicidal. White people are bilateral. If Derick is not leguminous and Derick is not fungicidal then Derick is bush. If Derick is manifest and Derick is bilateral then Derick is not bush. Derick is not leguminous.", "logic": "\nHooked(derick)\nforall x (Leguminous(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Bilateral(x) -> Leguminous(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) -> Leguminous(x))\nManifest(derick) and Hooked(derick) -> not Leguminous(derick)\nBilateral(derick) and Demoniacal(derick) -> Fungicidal(derick)\nforall x (Hooked(x) -> Bilateral(x))\nnot Leguminous(derick) and not Fungicidal(derick) -> Bush(derick)\nManifest(derick) and Bilateral(derick) -> not Bush(derick)\n\nnot Leguminous(derick)\n\nHooked(derick) and forall x (Hooked(x) -> Leguminous(x)) -> therefore Leguminous(derick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Karlotta is unparallel. Cold people are educated. If someone is lxxxii then they are duckbill. White people are duckbill. If Karlotta is isometric and Karlotta is unparallel then Karlotta is not duckbill. If Karlotta is lxxxii and Karlotta is educated then Karlotta is rightmost. White people are lxxxii. If Karlotta is not duckbill and Karlotta is not rightmost then Karlotta is crummy. If Karlotta is isometric and Karlotta is lxxxii then Karlotta is not crummy. Karlotta is educated.", "logic": "\nUnparallel(karlotta)\nforall x (Duckbill(x) -> Educated(x))\nforall x (Lxxxii(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nIsometric(karlotta) and Unparallel(karlotta) -> not Duckbill(karlotta)\nLxxxii(karlotta) and Educated(karlotta) -> Rightmost(karlotta)\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Lxxxii(x))\nnot Duckbill(karlotta) and not Rightmost(karlotta) -> Crummy(karlotta)\nIsometric(karlotta) and Lxxxii(karlotta) -> not Crummy(karlotta)\n\nEducated(karlotta)\n\nUnparallel(karlotta) and forall x (Unparallel(x) -> Duckbill(x)) -> therefore Duckbill(karlotta) Duckbill(karlotta) and forall x (Duckbill(x) -> Educated(x)) -> therefore Educated(karlotta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Daffie is oppressed. Cold people are slovenly. If someone is unchewable then they are answerable. White people are answerable. If Daffie is gilled and Daffie is oppressed then Daffie is not answerable. If Daffie is unchewable and Daffie is slovenly then Daffie is pancreatic. White people are unchewable. If Daffie is not answerable and Daffie is not pancreatic then Daffie is azygos. If Daffie is gilled and Daffie is unchewable then Daffie is not azygos. Daffie is not slovenly.", "logic": "\nOppressed(daffie)\nforall x (Answerable(x) -> Slovenly(x))\nforall x (Unchewable(x) -> Answerable(x))\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Answerable(x))\nGilled(daffie) and Oppressed(daffie) -> not Answerable(daffie)\nUnchewable(daffie) and Slovenly(daffie) -> Pancreatic(daffie)\nforall x (Oppressed(x) -> Unchewable(x))\nnot Answerable(daffie) and not Pancreatic(daffie) -> Azygos(daffie)\nGilled(daffie) and Unchewable(daffie) -> not Azygos(daffie)\n\nnot Slovenly(daffie)\n\nOppressed(daffie) and forall x (Oppressed(x) -> Answerable(x)) -> therefore Answerable(daffie) Answerable(daffie) and forall x (Answerable(x) -> Slovenly(x)) -> therefore Slovenly(daffie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Godiva is unvendible. Cold people are midget. If someone is bengali then they are voltarian. White people are voltarian. If Godiva is defamatory and Godiva is unvendible then Godiva is not voltarian. If Godiva is bengali and Godiva is midget then Godiva is confluent. White people are bengali. If Godiva is not voltarian and Godiva is not confluent then Godiva is packable. If Godiva is defamatory and Godiva is bengali then Godiva is not packable. Godiva is confluent.", "logic": "\nUnvendible(godiva)\nforall x (Voltarian(x) -> Midget(x))\nforall x (Bengali(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nforall x (Unvendible(x) -> Voltarian(x))\nDefamatory(godiva) and Unvendible(godiva) -> not Voltarian(godiva)\nBengali(godiva) and Midget(godiva) -> Confluent(godiva)\nforall x (Unvendible(x) -> Bengali(x))\nnot Voltarian(godiva) and not Confluent(godiva) -> Packable(godiva)\nDefamatory(godiva) and Bengali(godiva) -> not Packable(godiva)\n\nConfluent(godiva)\n\nUnvendible(godiva) and forall x (Unvendible(x) -> Bengali(x)) -> therefore Bengali(godiva) Unvendible(godiva) and forall x (Unvendible(x) -> Voltarian(x)) -> therefore Voltarian(godiva) Voltarian(godiva) and forall x (Voltarian(x) -> Midget(x)) -> therefore Midget(godiva) Bengali(godiva) and Midget(godiva) and Bengali(godiva) and Midget(godiva) -> Confluent(godiva) -> therefore Confluent(godiva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Erna is carbolated. Cold people are opaline. If someone is fugacious then they are unsecured. White people are unsecured. If Erna is ceylonese and Erna is carbolated then Erna is not unsecured. If Erna is fugacious and Erna is opaline then Erna is smothering. White people are fugacious. If Erna is not unsecured and Erna is not smothering then Erna is pudgy. If Erna is ceylonese and Erna is fugacious then Erna is not pudgy. Erna is not smothering.", "logic": "\nCarbolated(erna)\nforall x (Unsecured(x) -> Opaline(x))\nforall x (Fugacious(x) -> Unsecured(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Unsecured(x))\nCeylonese(erna) and Carbolated(erna) -> not Unsecured(erna)\nFugacious(erna) and Opaline(erna) -> Smothering(erna)\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Fugacious(x))\nnot Unsecured(erna) and not Smothering(erna) -> Pudgy(erna)\nCeylonese(erna) and Fugacious(erna) -> not Pudgy(erna)\n\nnot Smothering(erna)\n\nCarbolated(erna) and forall x (Carbolated(x) -> Fugacious(x)) -> therefore Fugacious(erna) Carbolated(erna) and forall x (Carbolated(x) -> Unsecured(x)) -> therefore Unsecured(erna) Unsecured(erna) and forall x (Unsecured(x) -> Opaline(x)) -> therefore Opaline(erna) Fugacious(erna) and Opaline(erna) and Fugacious(erna) and Opaline(erna) -> Smothering(erna) -> therefore Smothering(erna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Merola is aneurismal. Cold people are glazed. If someone is starved then they are depletable. White people are depletable. If Merola is bracing and Merola is aneurismal then Merola is not depletable. If Merola is starved and Merola is glazed then Merola is technical. White people are starved. If Merola is not depletable and Merola is not technical then Merola is inflated. If Merola is bracing and Merola is starved then Merola is not inflated. Merola is not inflated.", "logic": "\nAneurismal(merola)\nforall x (Depletable(x) -> Glazed(x))\nforall x (Starved(x) -> Depletable(x))\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Depletable(x))\nBracing(merola) and Aneurismal(merola) -> not Depletable(merola)\nStarved(merola) and Glazed(merola) -> Technical(merola)\nforall x (Aneurismal(x) -> Starved(x))\nnot Depletable(merola) and not Technical(merola) -> Inflated(merola)\nBracing(merola) and Starved(merola) -> not Inflated(merola)\n\nnot Inflated(merola)\n\nnot Depletable(merola) and not Technical(merola) -> Inflated(merola) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "Donella is fibrous. Cold people are sickening. If someone is amber then they are cometic. White people are cometic. If Donella is attic and Donella is fibrous then Donella is not cometic. If Donella is amber and Donella is sickening then Donella is thalloid. White people are amber. If Donella is not cometic and Donella is not thalloid then Donella is boiled. If Donella is attic and Donella is amber then Donella is not boiled. Donella is attic.", "logic": "\nFibrous(donella)\nforall x (Cometic(x) -> Sickening(x))\nforall x (Amber(x) -> Cometic(x))\nforall x (Fibrous(x) -> Cometic(x))\nAttic(donella) and Fibrous(donella) -> not Cometic(donella)\nAmber(donella) and Sickening(donella) -> Thalloid(donella)\nforall x (Fibrous(x) -> Amber(x))\nnot Cometic(donella) and not Thalloid(donella) -> Boiled(donella)\nAttic(donella) and Amber(donella) -> not Boiled(donella)\n\nAttic(donella)\n\nAttic(donella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-952"} {"premises": "The cynthy yawp the ivonne. The ivonne is telescopic. The ivonne rase the cynthy. If something is unmelted then it is stylized. If something caponize the cynthy then it is saucy. If the cynthy is unmelted then the cynthy rase the ivonne. If something caponize the ivonne then the ivonne is unmelted. If something is telescopic then it caponize the ivonne. If something rase the cynthy then the cynthy caponize the ivonne. If something yawp the ivonne and it caponize the cynthy then the ivonne yawp the cynthy. If something yawp the ivonne then the ivonne yawp the cynthy. The ivonne rase the cynthy.", "logic": "\nYawp(cynthy, ivonne)\nTelescopic(ivonne)\nRase(ivonne, cynthy)\nforall x (Unmelted(x) -> Stylized(x))\nforall x (Caponize(x, cynthy) -> Saucy(x))\nUnmelted(cynthy) -> Rase(cynthy, ivonne)\nforall x (Caponize(x, ivonne) -> Unmelted(ivonne))\nforall x (Telescopic(x) -> Caponize(x, ivonne))\nforall x (Rase(x, cynthy) -> Caponize(cynthy, ivonne))\nforall x (Yawp(x, ivonne) and Caponize(x, cynthy) -> Yawp(ivonne, cynthy))\nforall x (Yawp(x, ivonne) -> Yawp(ivonne, cynthy))\n\nRase(ivonne, cynthy)\n\ntherefore Rase(ivonne, cynthy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The darleen bulldog the corinne. The corinne is unfruitful. The corinne tilt the darleen. If something is quaternary then it is dismayed. If something squawk the darleen then it is just. If the darleen is quaternary then the darleen tilt the corinne. If something squawk the corinne then the corinne is quaternary. If something is unfruitful then it squawk the corinne. If something tilt the darleen then the darleen squawk the corinne. If something bulldog the corinne and it squawk the darleen then the corinne bulldog the darleen. If something bulldog the corinne then the corinne bulldog the darleen. The corinne does not visit the darleen.", "logic": "\nBulldog(darleen, corinne)\nUnfruitful(corinne)\nTilt(corinne, darleen)\nforall x (Quaternary(x) -> Dismayed(x))\nforall x (Squawk(x, darleen) -> Just(x))\nQuaternary(darleen) -> Tilt(darleen, corinne)\nforall x (Squawk(x, corinne) -> Quaternary(corinne))\nforall x (Unfruitful(x) -> Squawk(x, corinne))\nforall x (Tilt(x, darleen) -> Squawk(darleen, corinne))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, corinne) and Squawk(x, darleen) -> Bulldog(corinne, darleen))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, corinne) -> Bulldog(corinne, darleen))\n\nnot Tilt(corinne, darleen)\n\ntherefore Tilt(corinne, darleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The tiffy aggrandize the norri. The norri is aroid. The norri postmark the tiffy. If something is secondhand then it is obviating. If something recruit the tiffy then it is dominated. If the tiffy is secondhand then the tiffy postmark the norri. If something recruit the norri then the norri is secondhand. If something is aroid then it recruit the norri. If something postmark the tiffy then the tiffy recruit the norri. If something aggrandize the norri and it recruit the tiffy then the norri aggrandize the tiffy. If something aggrandize the norri then the norri aggrandize the tiffy. The norri recruit the norri.", "logic": "\nAggrandize(tiffy, norri)\nAroid(norri)\nPostmark(norri, tiffy)\nforall x (Secondhand(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Recruit(x, tiffy) -> Dominated(x))\nSecondhand(tiffy) -> Postmark(tiffy, norri)\nforall x (Recruit(x, norri) -> Secondhand(norri))\nforall x (Aroid(x) -> Recruit(x, norri))\nforall x (Postmark(x, tiffy) -> Recruit(tiffy, norri))\nforall x (Aggrandize(x, norri) and Recruit(x, tiffy) -> Aggrandize(norri, tiffy))\nforall x (Aggrandize(x, norri) -> Aggrandize(norri, tiffy))\n\nRecruit(norri, norri)\n\nAroid(norri) and forall x (Aroid(x) -> Recruit(x, norri)) -> therefore Recruit(norri, norri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The devonne spacewalk the kelsi. The kelsi is inlaid. The kelsi revolve the devonne. If something is vietnamese then it is polish. If something chafe the devonne then it is aneurismal. If the devonne is vietnamese then the devonne revolve the kelsi. If something chafe the kelsi then the kelsi is vietnamese. If something is inlaid then it chafe the kelsi. If something revolve the devonne then the devonne chafe the kelsi. If something spacewalk the kelsi and it chafe the devonne then the kelsi spacewalk the devonne. If something spacewalk the kelsi then the kelsi spacewalk the devonne. The kelsi does not chase the devonne.", "logic": "\nSpacewalk(devonne, kelsi)\nInlaid(kelsi)\nRevolve(kelsi, devonne)\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Chafe(x, devonne) -> Aneurismal(x))\nVietnamese(devonne) -> Revolve(devonne, kelsi)\nforall x (Chafe(x, kelsi) -> Vietnamese(kelsi))\nforall x (Inlaid(x) -> Chafe(x, kelsi))\nforall x (Revolve(x, devonne) -> Chafe(devonne, kelsi))\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, kelsi) and Chafe(x, devonne) -> Spacewalk(kelsi, devonne))\nforall x (Spacewalk(x, kelsi) -> Spacewalk(kelsi, devonne))\n\nnot Spacewalk(kelsi, devonne)\n\nSpacewalk(devonne, kelsi) and forall x (Spacewalk(x, kelsi) -> Spacewalk(kelsi, devonne)) -> therefore Spacewalk(kelsi, devonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The goldi unfasten the micheal. The micheal is untainted. The micheal gamble the goldi. If something is freudian then it is endoscopic. If something gargle the goldi then it is severed. If the goldi is freudian then the goldi gamble the micheal. If something gargle the micheal then the micheal is freudian. If something is untainted then it gargle the micheal. If something gamble the goldi then the goldi gargle the micheal. If something unfasten the micheal and it gargle the goldi then the micheal unfasten the goldi. If something unfasten the micheal then the micheal unfasten the goldi. The micheal is freudian.", "logic": "\nUnfasten(goldi, micheal)\nUntainted(micheal)\nGamble(micheal, goldi)\nforall x (Freudian(x) -> Endoscopic(x))\nforall x (Gargle(x, goldi) -> Severed(x))\nFreudian(goldi) -> Gamble(goldi, micheal)\nforall x (Gargle(x, micheal) -> Freudian(micheal))\nforall x (Untainted(x) -> Gargle(x, micheal))\nforall x (Gamble(x, goldi) -> Gargle(goldi, micheal))\nforall x (Unfasten(x, micheal) and Gargle(x, goldi) -> Unfasten(micheal, goldi))\nforall x (Unfasten(x, micheal) -> Unfasten(micheal, goldi))\n\nFreudian(micheal)\n\nUntainted(micheal) and forall x (Untainted(x) -> Gargle(x, micheal)) -> therefore Gargle(micheal, micheal) Gargle(micheal, micheal) and forall x (Gargle(x, micheal) -> Freudian(micheal)) -> therefore Freudian(micheal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The easton floor the elane. The elane is noble. The elane domineer the easton. If something is uncomplete then it is miserly. If something lade the easton then it is spent. If the easton is uncomplete then the easton domineer the elane. If something lade the elane then the elane is uncomplete. If something is noble then it lade the elane. If something domineer the easton then the easton lade the elane. If something floor the elane and it lade the easton then the elane floor the easton. If something floor the elane then the elane floor the easton. The elane is not uncomplete.", "logic": "\nFloor(easton, elane)\nNoble(elane)\nDomineer(elane, easton)\nforall x (Uncomplete(x) -> Miserly(x))\nforall x (Lade(x, easton) -> Spent(x))\nUncomplete(easton) -> Domineer(easton, elane)\nforall x (Lade(x, elane) -> Uncomplete(elane))\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Lade(x, elane))\nforall x (Domineer(x, easton) -> Lade(easton, elane))\nforall x (Floor(x, elane) and Lade(x, easton) -> Floor(elane, easton))\nforall x (Floor(x, elane) -> Floor(elane, easton))\n\nnot Uncomplete(elane)\n\nNoble(elane) and forall x (Noble(x) -> Lade(x, elane)) -> therefore Lade(elane, elane) Lade(elane, elane) and forall x (Lade(x, elane) -> Uncomplete(elane)) -> therefore Uncomplete(elane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The genevieve toggle the valenka. The valenka is gushy. The valenka whale the genevieve. If something is striate then it is skintight. If something interlope the genevieve then it is insanitary. If the genevieve is striate then the genevieve whale the valenka. If something interlope the valenka then the valenka is striate. If something is gushy then it interlope the valenka. If something whale the genevieve then the genevieve interlope the valenka. If something toggle the valenka and it interlope the genevieve then the valenka toggle the genevieve. If something toggle the valenka then the valenka toggle the genevieve. The valenka is skintight.", "logic": "\nToggle(genevieve, valenka)\nGushy(valenka)\nWhale(valenka, genevieve)\nforall x (Striate(x) -> Skintight(x))\nforall x (Interlope(x, genevieve) -> Insanitary(x))\nStriate(genevieve) -> Whale(genevieve, valenka)\nforall x (Interlope(x, valenka) -> Striate(valenka))\nforall x (Gushy(x) -> Interlope(x, valenka))\nforall x (Whale(x, genevieve) -> Interlope(genevieve, valenka))\nforall x (Toggle(x, valenka) and Interlope(x, genevieve) -> Toggle(valenka, genevieve))\nforall x (Toggle(x, valenka) -> Toggle(valenka, genevieve))\n\nSkintight(valenka)\n\nGushy(valenka) and forall x (Gushy(x) -> Interlope(x, valenka)) -> therefore Interlope(valenka, valenka) Interlope(valenka, valenka) and forall x (Interlope(x, valenka) -> Striate(valenka)) -> therefore Striate(valenka) Striate(valenka) and forall x (Striate(x) -> Skintight(x)) -> therefore Skintight(valenka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The raymund macerate the siward. The siward is thyroid. The siward bleep the raymund. If something is brushlike then it is superior. If something invalidate the raymund then it is acanthoid. If the raymund is brushlike then the raymund bleep the siward. If something invalidate the siward then the siward is brushlike. If something is thyroid then it invalidate the siward. If something bleep the raymund then the raymund invalidate the siward. If something macerate the siward and it invalidate the raymund then the siward macerate the raymund. If something macerate the siward then the siward macerate the raymund. The siward is not superior.", "logic": "\nMacerate(raymund, siward)\nThyroid(siward)\nBleep(siward, raymund)\nforall x (Brushlike(x) -> Superior(x))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, raymund) -> Acanthoid(x))\nBrushlike(raymund) -> Bleep(raymund, siward)\nforall x (Invalidate(x, siward) -> Brushlike(siward))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Invalidate(x, siward))\nforall x (Bleep(x, raymund) -> Invalidate(raymund, siward))\nforall x (Macerate(x, siward) and Invalidate(x, raymund) -> Macerate(siward, raymund))\nforall x (Macerate(x, siward) -> Macerate(siward, raymund))\n\nnot Superior(siward)\n\nThyroid(siward) and forall x (Thyroid(x) -> Invalidate(x, siward)) -> therefore Invalidate(siward, siward) Invalidate(siward, siward) and forall x (Invalidate(x, siward) -> Brushlike(siward)) -> therefore Brushlike(siward) Brushlike(siward) and forall x (Brushlike(x) -> Superior(x)) -> therefore Superior(siward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The rickie nerve the quiggly. The quiggly is myocardial. The quiggly demob the rickie. If something is precise then it is unmatched. If something hate the rickie then it is anglican. If the rickie is precise then the rickie demob the quiggly. If something hate the quiggly then the quiggly is precise. If something is myocardial then it hate the quiggly. If something demob the rickie then the rickie hate the quiggly. If something nerve the quiggly and it hate the rickie then the quiggly nerve the rickie. If something nerve the quiggly then the quiggly nerve the rickie. The rickie does not visit the quiggly.", "logic": "\nNerve(rickie, quiggly)\nMyocardial(quiggly)\nDemob(quiggly, rickie)\nforall x (Precise(x) -> Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Hate(x, rickie) -> Anglican(x))\nPrecise(rickie) -> Demob(rickie, quiggly)\nforall x (Hate(x, quiggly) -> Precise(quiggly))\nforall x (Myocardial(x) -> Hate(x, quiggly))\nforall x (Demob(x, rickie) -> Hate(rickie, quiggly))\nforall x (Nerve(x, quiggly) and Hate(x, rickie) -> Nerve(quiggly, rickie))\nforall x (Nerve(x, quiggly) -> Nerve(quiggly, rickie))\n\nnot Demob(rickie, quiggly)\n\nPrecise(rickie) -> Demob(rickie, quiggly) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The steffen reuse the shelby. The shelby is restrained. The shelby deaerate the steffen. If something is alkylic then it is endergonic. If something rehear the steffen then it is nineteen. If the steffen is alkylic then the steffen deaerate the shelby. If something rehear the shelby then the shelby is alkylic. If something is restrained then it rehear the shelby. If something deaerate the steffen then the steffen rehear the shelby. If something reuse the shelby and it rehear the steffen then the shelby reuse the steffen. If something reuse the shelby then the shelby reuse the steffen. The steffen is endergonic.", "logic": "\nReuse(steffen, shelby)\nRestrained(shelby)\nDeaerate(shelby, steffen)\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Endergonic(x))\nforall x (Rehear(x, steffen) -> Nineteen(x))\nAlkylic(steffen) -> Deaerate(steffen, shelby)\nforall x (Rehear(x, shelby) -> Alkylic(shelby))\nforall x (Restrained(x) -> Rehear(x, shelby))\nforall x (Deaerate(x, steffen) -> Rehear(steffen, shelby))\nforall x (Reuse(x, shelby) and Rehear(x, steffen) -> Reuse(shelby, steffen))\nforall x (Reuse(x, shelby) -> Reuse(shelby, steffen))\n\nEndergonic(steffen)\n\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Endergonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The heather heal the sax. The sax is waning. The sax jeer the heather. If something is equal then it is revokable. If something gasify the heather then it is degraded. If the heather is equal then the heather jeer the sax. If something gasify the sax then the sax is equal. If something is waning then it gasify the sax. If something jeer the heather then the heather gasify the sax. If something heal the sax and it gasify the heather then the sax heal the heather. If something heal the sax then the sax heal the heather. The sax is not degraded.", "logic": "\nHeal(heather, sax)\nWaning(sax)\nJeer(sax, heather)\nforall x (Equal(x) -> Revokable(x))\nforall x (Gasify(x, heather) -> Degraded(x))\nEqual(heather) -> Jeer(heather, sax)\nforall x (Gasify(x, sax) -> Equal(sax))\nforall x (Waning(x) -> Gasify(x, sax))\nforall x (Jeer(x, heather) -> Gasify(heather, sax))\nforall x (Heal(x, sax) and Gasify(x, heather) -> Heal(sax, heather))\nforall x (Heal(x, sax) -> Heal(sax, heather))\n\nnot Degraded(sax)\n\nforall x (Gasify(x, heather) -> Degraded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The burgess marbleise the maggi. The maggi is unservile. The maggi harm the burgess. If something is interwoven then it is mesolithic. If something exhaust the burgess then it is bushy. If the burgess is interwoven then the burgess harm the maggi. If something exhaust the maggi then the maggi is interwoven. If something is unservile then it exhaust the maggi. If something harm the burgess then the burgess exhaust the maggi. If something marbleise the maggi and it exhaust the burgess then the maggi marbleise the burgess. If something marbleise the maggi then the maggi marbleise the burgess. The burgess is bushy.", "logic": "\nMarbleise(burgess, maggi)\nUnservile(maggi)\nHarm(maggi, burgess)\nforall x (Interwoven(x) -> Mesolithic(x))\nforall x (Exhaust(x, burgess) -> Bushy(x))\nInterwoven(burgess) -> Harm(burgess, maggi)\nforall x (Exhaust(x, maggi) -> Interwoven(maggi))\nforall x (Unservile(x) -> Exhaust(x, maggi))\nforall x (Harm(x, burgess) -> Exhaust(burgess, maggi))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, maggi) and Exhaust(x, burgess) -> Marbleise(maggi, burgess))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, maggi) -> Marbleise(maggi, burgess))\n\nBushy(burgess)\n\nforall x (Exhaust(x, burgess) -> Bushy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The kenneth constipate the selinda. The selinda is right. The selinda include the kenneth. If something is agonising then it is flat. If something license the kenneth then it is achy. If the kenneth is agonising then the kenneth include the selinda. If something license the selinda then the selinda is agonising. If something is right then it license the selinda. If something include the kenneth then the kenneth license the selinda. If something constipate the selinda and it license the kenneth then the selinda constipate the kenneth. If something constipate the selinda then the selinda constipate the kenneth. The selinda is not rough.", "logic": "\nConstipate(kenneth, selinda)\nRight(selinda)\nInclude(selinda, kenneth)\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> Flat(x))\nforall x (License(x, kenneth) -> Achy(x))\nAgonising(kenneth) -> Include(kenneth, selinda)\nforall x (License(x, selinda) -> Agonising(selinda))\nforall x (Right(x) -> License(x, selinda))\nforall x (Include(x, kenneth) -> License(kenneth, selinda))\nforall x (Constipate(x, selinda) and License(x, kenneth) -> Constipate(selinda, kenneth))\nforall x (Constipate(x, selinda) -> Constipate(selinda, kenneth))\n\nnot Rough(selinda)\n\nnot Rough(selinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The alina sweeten the mackenzie. The mackenzie is avirulent. The mackenzie execrate the alina. If something is underhand then it is quaternary. If something ascribe the alina then it is adaptative. If the alina is underhand then the alina execrate the mackenzie. If something ascribe the mackenzie then the mackenzie is underhand. If something is avirulent then it ascribe the mackenzie. If something execrate the alina then the alina ascribe the mackenzie. If something sweeten the mackenzie and it ascribe the alina then the mackenzie sweeten the alina. If something sweeten the mackenzie then the mackenzie sweeten the alina. The mackenzie execrate the mackenzie.", "logic": "\nSweeten(alina, mackenzie)\nAvirulent(mackenzie)\nExecrate(mackenzie, alina)\nforall x (Underhand(x) -> Quaternary(x))\nforall x (Ascribe(x, alina) -> Adaptative(x))\nUnderhand(alina) -> Execrate(alina, mackenzie)\nforall x (Ascribe(x, mackenzie) -> Underhand(mackenzie))\nforall x (Avirulent(x) -> Ascribe(x, mackenzie))\nforall x (Execrate(x, alina) -> Ascribe(alina, mackenzie))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, mackenzie) and Ascribe(x, alina) -> Sweeten(mackenzie, alina))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, mackenzie) -> Sweeten(mackenzie, alina))\n\nExecrate(mackenzie, mackenzie)\n\nExecrate(mackenzie, mackenzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The genni campaign the maxie. The maxie is concave. The maxie vulgarise the genni. If something is multicolor then it is dismissed. If something arise the genni then it is skinny. If the genni is multicolor then the genni vulgarise the maxie. If something arise the maxie then the maxie is multicolor. If something is concave then it arise the maxie. If something vulgarise the genni then the genni arise the maxie. If something campaign the maxie and it arise the genni then the maxie campaign the genni. If something campaign the maxie then the maxie campaign the genni. The maxie does not eat the genni.", "logic": "\nCampaign(genni, maxie)\nConcave(maxie)\nVulgarise(maxie, genni)\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> Dismissed(x))\nforall x (Arise(x, genni) -> Skinny(x))\nMulticolor(genni) -> Vulgarise(genni, maxie)\nforall x (Arise(x, maxie) -> Multicolor(maxie))\nforall x (Concave(x) -> Arise(x, maxie))\nforall x (Vulgarise(x, genni) -> Arise(genni, maxie))\nforall x (Campaign(x, maxie) and Arise(x, genni) -> Campaign(maxie, genni))\nforall x (Campaign(x, maxie) -> Campaign(maxie, genni))\n\nnot Arise(maxie, genni)\n\nnot Arise(maxie, genni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "The cicily execrate the gunilla. The gunilla is seasoned. The gunilla certify the cicily. If something is unadorned then it is advective. If something hollow the cicily then it is gallic. If the cicily is unadorned then the cicily certify the gunilla. If something hollow the gunilla then the gunilla is unadorned. If something is seasoned then it hollow the gunilla. If something certify the cicily then the cicily hollow the gunilla. If something execrate the gunilla and it hollow the cicily then the gunilla execrate the cicily. If something execrate the gunilla then the gunilla execrate the cicily. The gunilla execrate the gunilla.", "logic": "\nExecrate(cicily, gunilla)\nSeasoned(gunilla)\nCertify(gunilla, cicily)\nforall x (Unadorned(x) -> Advective(x))\nforall x (Hollow(x, cicily) -> Gallic(x))\nUnadorned(cicily) -> Certify(cicily, gunilla)\nforall x (Hollow(x, gunilla) -> Unadorned(gunilla))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) -> Hollow(x, gunilla))\nforall x (Certify(x, cicily) -> Hollow(cicily, gunilla))\nforall x (Execrate(x, gunilla) and Hollow(x, cicily) -> Execrate(gunilla, cicily))\nforall x (Execrate(x, gunilla) -> Execrate(gunilla, cicily))\n\nExecrate(gunilla, gunilla)\n\nExecrate(gunilla, gunilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1527"} {"premises": "Emogene is perfected. Emogene is spoilable. Emogene is not tiny. If someone is perfected then they are not rending. All rending people are not harmonious. If Emogene is rending then Emogene is not antepartum. If Emogene is not rending then Emogene is harmonious. All harmonious people are not antepartum. If someone is harmonious then they are not antepartum. Emogene is not tiny.", "logic": "\nPerfected(emogene)\nSpoilable(emogene)\nnot Tiny(emogene)\nforall x (Perfected(x) -> not Rending(x))\nforall x (Rending(x) -> not Harmonious(x))\nRending(emogene) -> not Antepartum(emogene)\nnot Rending(emogene) -> Harmonious(emogene)\nforall x (Harmonious(x) -> not Antepartum(x))\nforall x (Harmonious(x) -> not Antepartum(x))\n\nnot Tiny(emogene)\n\ntherefore not Tiny(emogene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Astra is iberian. Astra is unweary. Astra is not federated. If someone is iberian then they are not taken. All taken people are not exogenous. If Astra is taken then Astra is not bimodal. If Astra is not taken then Astra is exogenous. All exogenous people are not bimodal. If someone is exogenous then they are not bimodal. Astra is not iberian.", "logic": "\nIberian(astra)\nUnweary(astra)\nnot Federated(astra)\nforall x (Iberian(x) -> not Taken(x))\nforall x (Taken(x) -> not Exogenous(x))\nTaken(astra) -> not Bimodal(astra)\nnot Taken(astra) -> Exogenous(astra)\nforall x (Exogenous(x) -> not Bimodal(x))\nforall x (Exogenous(x) -> not Bimodal(x))\n\nnot Iberian(astra)\n\ntherefore Iberian(astra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Tull is atlantic. Tull is fizzy. Tull is not serene. If someone is atlantic then they are not saprozoic. All saprozoic people are not costive. If Tull is saprozoic then Tull is not catoptric. If Tull is not saprozoic then Tull is costive. All costive people are not catoptric. If someone is costive then they are not catoptric. Tull is not saprozoic.", "logic": "\nAtlantic(tull)\nFizzy(tull)\nnot Serene(tull)\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> not Saprozoic(x))\nforall x (Saprozoic(x) -> not Costive(x))\nSaprozoic(tull) -> not Catoptric(tull)\nnot Saprozoic(tull) -> Costive(tull)\nforall x (Costive(x) -> not Catoptric(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) -> not Catoptric(x))\n\nnot Saprozoic(tull)\n\nAtlantic(tull) and forall x (Atlantic(x) -> not Saprozoic(x)) -> therefore not Saprozoic(tull)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Esma is blinding. Esma is muzzy. Esma is not stoical. If someone is blinding then they are not raptorial. All raptorial people are not silky. If Esma is raptorial then Esma is not sculpted. If Esma is not raptorial then Esma is silky. All silky people are not sculpted. If someone is silky then they are not sculpted. Esma is raptorial.", "logic": "\nBlinding(esma)\nMuzzy(esma)\nnot Stoical(esma)\nforall x (Blinding(x) -> not Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) -> not Silky(x))\nRaptorial(esma) -> not Sculpted(esma)\nnot Raptorial(esma) -> Silky(esma)\nforall x (Silky(x) -> not Sculpted(x))\nforall x (Silky(x) -> not Sculpted(x))\n\nRaptorial(esma)\n\nBlinding(esma) and forall x (Blinding(x) -> not Raptorial(x)) -> therefore not Raptorial(esma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Oliy is assentient. Oliy is amusive. Oliy is not powerless. If someone is assentient then they are not quilted. All quilted people are not peristylar. If Oliy is quilted then Oliy is not implicated. If Oliy is not quilted then Oliy is peristylar. All peristylar people are not implicated. If someone is peristylar then they are not implicated. Oliy is peristylar.", "logic": "\nAssentient(oliy)\nAmusive(oliy)\nnot Powerless(oliy)\nforall x (Assentient(x) -> not Quilted(x))\nforall x (Quilted(x) -> not Peristylar(x))\nQuilted(oliy) -> not Implicated(oliy)\nnot Quilted(oliy) -> Peristylar(oliy)\nforall x (Peristylar(x) -> not Implicated(x))\nforall x (Peristylar(x) -> not Implicated(x))\n\nPeristylar(oliy)\n\nAssentient(oliy) and forall x (Assentient(x) -> not Quilted(x)) -> therefore not Quilted(oliy) not Quilted(oliy) and not Quilted(oliy) -> Peristylar(oliy) -> therefore Peristylar(oliy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Tabbi is early. Tabbi is allegoric. Tabbi is not biblical. If someone is early then they are not doctoral. All doctoral people are not cervical. If Tabbi is doctoral then Tabbi is not single. If Tabbi is not doctoral then Tabbi is cervical. All cervical people are not single. If someone is cervical then they are not single. Tabbi is not cervical.", "logic": "\nEarly(tabbi)\nAllegoric(tabbi)\nnot Biblical(tabbi)\nforall x (Early(x) -> not Doctoral(x))\nforall x (Doctoral(x) -> not Cervical(x))\nDoctoral(tabbi) -> not Single(tabbi)\nnot Doctoral(tabbi) -> Cervical(tabbi)\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> not Single(x))\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> not Single(x))\n\nnot Cervical(tabbi)\n\nEarly(tabbi) and forall x (Early(x) -> not Doctoral(x)) -> therefore not Doctoral(tabbi) not Doctoral(tabbi) and not Doctoral(tabbi) -> Cervical(tabbi) -> therefore Cervical(tabbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Brunhilde is spacey. Brunhilde is villainous. Brunhilde is not blatant. If someone is spacey then they are not jesuit. All jesuit people are not well. If Brunhilde is jesuit then Brunhilde is not emeritus. If Brunhilde is not jesuit then Brunhilde is well. All well people are not emeritus. If someone is well then they are not emeritus. Brunhilde is not emeritus.", "logic": "\nSpacey(brunhilde)\nVillainous(brunhilde)\nnot Blatant(brunhilde)\nforall x (Spacey(x) -> not Jesuit(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) -> not Well(x))\nJesuit(brunhilde) -> not Emeritus(brunhilde)\nnot Jesuit(brunhilde) -> Well(brunhilde)\nforall x (Well(x) -> not Emeritus(x))\nforall x (Well(x) -> not Emeritus(x))\n\nnot Emeritus(brunhilde)\n\nSpacey(brunhilde) and forall x (Spacey(x) -> not Jesuit(x)) -> therefore not Jesuit(brunhilde) not Jesuit(brunhilde) and not Jesuit(brunhilde) -> Well(brunhilde) -> therefore Well(brunhilde) Well(brunhilde) and forall x (Well(x) -> not Emeritus(x)) -> therefore not Emeritus(brunhilde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Fox is vinegary. Fox is adrift. Fox is not aphonic. If someone is vinegary then they are not blunt. All blunt people are not nipponese. If Fox is blunt then Fox is not fragmental. If Fox is not blunt then Fox is nipponese. All nipponese people are not fragmental. If someone is nipponese then they are not fragmental. Fox is fragmental.", "logic": "\nVinegary(fox)\nAdrift(fox)\nnot Aphonic(fox)\nforall x (Vinegary(x) -> not Blunt(x))\nforall x (Blunt(x) -> not Nipponese(x))\nBlunt(fox) -> not Fragmental(fox)\nnot Blunt(fox) -> Nipponese(fox)\nforall x (Nipponese(x) -> not Fragmental(x))\nforall x (Nipponese(x) -> not Fragmental(x))\n\nFragmental(fox)\n\nVinegary(fox) and forall x (Vinegary(x) -> not Blunt(x)) -> therefore not Blunt(fox) not Blunt(fox) and not Blunt(fox) -> Nipponese(fox) -> therefore Nipponese(fox) Nipponese(fox) and forall x (Nipponese(x) -> not Fragmental(x)) -> therefore not Fragmental(fox)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1335"} {"premises": "Nadia is stopped. Nadia is coquettish. Nadia is dissimilar. Zora is catalatic. Zora is stopped. Zora is british. Zora is christlike. Zora is coquettish. Zora is dissimilar. Zora is mucinoid. Clarisa is catalatic. Clarisa is christlike. Clarisa is dissimilar. Marj is christlike. Marj is dissimilar. All christlike, catalatic people are mucinoid. If someone is dissimilar and coquettish then they are mucinoid. If Marj is christlike then Marj is coquettish. White people are british. Kind people are dissimilar. If someone is british then they are mucinoid. All catalatic, mucinoid people are coquettish. All british people are christlike. Zora is catalatic.", "logic": "\nStopped(nadia)\nCoquettish(nadia)\nDissimilar(nadia)\nCatalatic(zora)\nStopped(zora)\nBritish(zora)\nChristlike(zora)\nCoquettish(zora)\nDissimilar(zora)\nMucinoid(zora)\nCatalatic(clarisa)\nChristlike(clarisa)\nDissimilar(clarisa)\nChristlike(marj)\nDissimilar(marj)\nforall x (Christlike(x) and Catalatic(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Dissimilar(x) and Coquettish(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nChristlike(marj) -> Coquettish(marj)\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> British(x))\nforall x (British(x) -> Dissimilar(x))\nforall x (British(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Catalatic(x) and Mucinoid(x) -> Coquettish(x))\nforall x (British(x) -> Christlike(x))\n\nCatalatic(zora)\n\ntherefore Catalatic(zora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Jacenta is dotted. Jacenta is trig. Jacenta is shapely. Emmery is bounteous. Emmery is dotted. Emmery is uxorial. Emmery is clouded. Emmery is trig. Emmery is shapely. Emmery is unanswered. Richie is bounteous. Richie is clouded. Richie is shapely. Shepard is clouded. Shepard is shapely. All clouded, bounteous people are unanswered. If someone is shapely and trig then they are unanswered. If Shepard is clouded then Shepard is trig. White people are uxorial. Kind people are shapely. If someone is uxorial then they are unanswered. All bounteous, unanswered people are trig. All uxorial people are clouded. Emmery is not uxorial.", "logic": "\nDotted(jacenta)\nTrig(jacenta)\nShapely(jacenta)\nBounteous(emmery)\nDotted(emmery)\nUxorial(emmery)\nClouded(emmery)\nTrig(emmery)\nShapely(emmery)\nUnanswered(emmery)\nBounteous(richie)\nClouded(richie)\nShapely(richie)\nClouded(shepard)\nShapely(shepard)\nforall x (Clouded(x) and Bounteous(x) -> Unanswered(x))\nforall x (Shapely(x) and Trig(x) -> Unanswered(x))\nClouded(shepard) -> Trig(shepard)\nforall x (Unanswered(x) -> Uxorial(x))\nforall x (Uxorial(x) -> Shapely(x))\nforall x (Uxorial(x) -> Unanswered(x))\nforall x (Bounteous(x) and Unanswered(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Uxorial(x) -> Clouded(x))\n\nnot Uxorial(emmery)\n\ntherefore Uxorial(emmery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Ryann is agonistic. Ryann is serous. Ryann is hesperian. Rina is detersive. Rina is agonistic. Rina is sensed. Rina is sneezy. Rina is serous. Rina is hesperian. Rina is derogative. Marysa is detersive. Marysa is sneezy. Marysa is hesperian. Claudina is sneezy. Claudina is hesperian. All sneezy, detersive people are derogative. If someone is hesperian and serous then they are derogative. If Claudina is sneezy then Claudina is serous. White people are sensed. Kind people are hesperian. If someone is sensed then they are derogative. All detersive, derogative people are serous. All sensed people are sneezy. Marysa is derogative.", "logic": "\nAgonistic(ryann)\nSerous(ryann)\nHesperian(ryann)\nDetersive(rina)\nAgonistic(rina)\nSensed(rina)\nSneezy(rina)\nSerous(rina)\nHesperian(rina)\nDerogative(rina)\nDetersive(marysa)\nSneezy(marysa)\nHesperian(marysa)\nSneezy(claudina)\nHesperian(claudina)\nforall x (Sneezy(x) and Detersive(x) -> Derogative(x))\nforall x (Hesperian(x) and Serous(x) -> Derogative(x))\nSneezy(claudina) -> Serous(claudina)\nforall x (Derogative(x) -> Sensed(x))\nforall x (Sensed(x) -> Hesperian(x))\nforall x (Sensed(x) -> Derogative(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) and Derogative(x) -> Serous(x))\nforall x (Sensed(x) -> Sneezy(x))\n\nDerogative(marysa)\n\nSneezy(marysa) and Detersive(marysa) and forall x (Sneezy(x) and Detersive(x) -> Derogative(x)) -> therefore Derogative(marysa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Umberto is crazy. Umberto is corrupting. Umberto is notorious. Rand is unionised. Rand is crazy. Rand is admittible. Rand is unclaimed. Rand is corrupting. Rand is notorious. Rand is layered. Audrye is unionised. Audrye is unclaimed. Audrye is notorious. Anselma is unclaimed. Anselma is notorious. All unclaimed, unionised people are layered. If someone is notorious and corrupting then they are layered. If Anselma is unclaimed then Anselma is corrupting. White people are admittible. Kind people are notorious. If someone is admittible then they are layered. All unionised, layered people are corrupting. All admittible people are unclaimed. Anselma is not corrupting.", "logic": "\nCrazy(umberto)\nCorrupting(umberto)\nNotorious(umberto)\nUnionised(rand)\nCrazy(rand)\nAdmittible(rand)\nUnclaimed(rand)\nCorrupting(rand)\nNotorious(rand)\nLayered(rand)\nUnionised(audrye)\nUnclaimed(audrye)\nNotorious(audrye)\nUnclaimed(anselma)\nNotorious(anselma)\nforall x (Unclaimed(x) and Unionised(x) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Notorious(x) and Corrupting(x) -> Layered(x))\nUnclaimed(anselma) -> Corrupting(anselma)\nforall x (Layered(x) -> Admittible(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) -> Notorious(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) -> Layered(x))\nforall x (Unionised(x) and Layered(x) -> Corrupting(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) -> Unclaimed(x))\n\nnot Corrupting(anselma)\n\nUnclaimed(anselma) and Unclaimed(anselma) -> Corrupting(anselma) -> therefore Corrupting(anselma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Alwin is ungrudging. Alwin is skeptical. Alwin is textual. Simonette is hapless. Simonette is ungrudging. Simonette is precious. Simonette is narcotic. Simonette is skeptical. Simonette is textual. Simonette is foggy. Pepi is hapless. Pepi is narcotic. Pepi is textual. Robin is narcotic. Robin is textual. All narcotic, hapless people are foggy. If someone is textual and skeptical then they are foggy. If Robin is narcotic then Robin is skeptical. White people are precious. Kind people are textual. If someone is precious then they are foggy. All hapless, foggy people are skeptical. All precious people are narcotic. Alwin is precious.", "logic": "\nUngrudging(alwin)\nSkeptical(alwin)\nTextual(alwin)\nHapless(simonette)\nUngrudging(simonette)\nPrecious(simonette)\nNarcotic(simonette)\nSkeptical(simonette)\nTextual(simonette)\nFoggy(simonette)\nHapless(pepi)\nNarcotic(pepi)\nTextual(pepi)\nNarcotic(robin)\nTextual(robin)\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Hapless(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Textual(x) and Skeptical(x) -> Foggy(x))\nNarcotic(robin) -> Skeptical(robin)\nforall x (Foggy(x) -> Precious(x))\nforall x (Precious(x) -> Textual(x))\nforall x (Precious(x) -> Foggy(x))\nforall x (Hapless(x) and Foggy(x) -> Skeptical(x))\nforall x (Precious(x) -> Narcotic(x))\n\nPrecious(alwin)\n\nTextual(alwin) and Skeptical(alwin) and forall x (Textual(x) and Skeptical(x) -> Foggy(x)) -> therefore Foggy(alwin) Foggy(alwin) and forall x (Foggy(x) -> Precious(x)) -> therefore Precious(alwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Kimmy is rocklike. Kimmy is freelance. Kimmy is cognizant. Doralynn is legible. Doralynn is rocklike. Doralynn is covetous. Doralynn is splashy. Doralynn is freelance. Doralynn is cognizant. Doralynn is convinced. Gershom is legible. Gershom is splashy. Gershom is cognizant. Tanney is splashy. Tanney is cognizant. All splashy, legible people are convinced. If someone is cognizant and freelance then they are convinced. If Tanney is splashy then Tanney is freelance. White people are covetous. Kind people are cognizant. If someone is covetous then they are convinced. All legible, convinced people are freelance. All covetous people are splashy. Tanney is not convinced.", "logic": "\nRocklike(kimmy)\nFreelance(kimmy)\nCognizant(kimmy)\nLegible(doralynn)\nRocklike(doralynn)\nCovetous(doralynn)\nSplashy(doralynn)\nFreelance(doralynn)\nCognizant(doralynn)\nConvinced(doralynn)\nLegible(gershom)\nSplashy(gershom)\nCognizant(gershom)\nSplashy(tanney)\nCognizant(tanney)\nforall x (Splashy(x) and Legible(x) -> Convinced(x))\nforall x (Cognizant(x) and Freelance(x) -> Convinced(x))\nSplashy(tanney) -> Freelance(tanney)\nforall x (Convinced(x) -> Covetous(x))\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> Cognizant(x))\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> Convinced(x))\nforall x (Legible(x) and Convinced(x) -> Freelance(x))\nforall x (Covetous(x) -> Splashy(x))\n\nnot Convinced(tanney)\n\nSplashy(tanney) and Splashy(tanney) -> Freelance(tanney) -> therefore Freelance(tanney) Cognizant(tanney) and Freelance(tanney) and forall x (Cognizant(x) and Freelance(x) -> Convinced(x)) -> therefore Convinced(tanney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Leonanie is torpid. Leonanie is foldable. Leonanie is afflicted. Brigitte is teachable. Brigitte is torpid. Brigitte is cuban. Brigitte is katharobic. Brigitte is foldable. Brigitte is afflicted. Brigitte is remote. Werner is teachable. Werner is katharobic. Werner is afflicted. Talbert is katharobic. Talbert is afflicted. All katharobic, teachable people are remote. If someone is afflicted and foldable then they are remote. If Talbert is katharobic then Talbert is foldable. White people are cuban. Kind people are afflicted. If someone is cuban then they are remote. All teachable, remote people are foldable. All cuban people are katharobic. Talbert is cuban.", "logic": "\nTorpid(leonanie)\nFoldable(leonanie)\nAfflicted(leonanie)\nTeachable(brigitte)\nTorpid(brigitte)\nCuban(brigitte)\nKatharobic(brigitte)\nFoldable(brigitte)\nAfflicted(brigitte)\nRemote(brigitte)\nTeachable(werner)\nKatharobic(werner)\nAfflicted(werner)\nKatharobic(talbert)\nAfflicted(talbert)\nforall x (Katharobic(x) and Teachable(x) -> Remote(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and Foldable(x) -> Remote(x))\nKatharobic(talbert) -> Foldable(talbert)\nforall x (Remote(x) -> Cuban(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Remote(x))\nforall x (Teachable(x) and Remote(x) -> Foldable(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Katharobic(x))\n\nCuban(talbert)\n\nKatharobic(talbert) and Katharobic(talbert) -> Foldable(talbert) -> therefore Foldable(talbert) Afflicted(talbert) and Foldable(talbert) and forall x (Afflicted(x) and Foldable(x) -> Remote(x)) -> therefore Remote(talbert) Remote(talbert) and forall x (Remote(x) -> Cuban(x)) -> therefore Cuban(talbert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Shayne is treacly. Shayne is impeded. Shayne is virucidal. Ailey is delectable. Ailey is treacly. Ailey is south. Ailey is east. Ailey is impeded. Ailey is virucidal. Ailey is nonlethal. Aron is delectable. Aron is east. Aron is virucidal. Cybill is east. Cybill is virucidal. All east, delectable people are nonlethal. If someone is virucidal and impeded then they are nonlethal. If Cybill is east then Cybill is impeded. White people are south. Kind people are virucidal. If someone is south then they are nonlethal. All delectable, nonlethal people are impeded. All south people are east. Cybill is not south.", "logic": "\nTreacly(shayne)\nImpeded(shayne)\nVirucidal(shayne)\nDelectable(ailey)\nTreacly(ailey)\nSouth(ailey)\nEast(ailey)\nImpeded(ailey)\nVirucidal(ailey)\nNonlethal(ailey)\nDelectable(aron)\nEast(aron)\nVirucidal(aron)\nEast(cybill)\nVirucidal(cybill)\nforall x (East(x) and Delectable(x) -> Nonlethal(x))\nforall x (Virucidal(x) and Impeded(x) -> Nonlethal(x))\nEast(cybill) -> Impeded(cybill)\nforall x (Nonlethal(x) -> South(x))\nforall x (South(x) -> Virucidal(x))\nforall x (South(x) -> Nonlethal(x))\nforall x (Delectable(x) and Nonlethal(x) -> Impeded(x))\nforall x (South(x) -> East(x))\n\nnot South(cybill)\n\nEast(cybill) and East(cybill) -> Impeded(cybill) -> therefore Impeded(cybill) Virucidal(cybill) and Impeded(cybill) and forall x (Virucidal(x) and Impeded(x) -> Nonlethal(x)) -> therefore Nonlethal(cybill) Nonlethal(cybill) and forall x (Nonlethal(x) -> South(x)) -> therefore South(cybill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Haywood is thieving. Haywood is momentary. Haywood is inst. Xenos is advancing. Xenos is thieving. Xenos is mobile. Xenos is antithetic. Xenos is momentary. Xenos is inst. Xenos is penniless. Elena is advancing. Elena is antithetic. Elena is inst. Kalie is antithetic. Kalie is inst. All antithetic, advancing people are penniless. If someone is inst and momentary then they are penniless. If Kalie is antithetic then Kalie is momentary. White people are mobile. Kind people are inst. If someone is mobile then they are penniless. All advancing, penniless people are momentary. All mobile people are antithetic. Kalie is not thieving.", "logic": "\nThieving(haywood)\nMomentary(haywood)\nInst(haywood)\nAdvancing(xenos)\nThieving(xenos)\nMobile(xenos)\nAntithetic(xenos)\nMomentary(xenos)\nInst(xenos)\nPenniless(xenos)\nAdvancing(elena)\nAntithetic(elena)\nInst(elena)\nAntithetic(kalie)\nInst(kalie)\nforall x (Antithetic(x) and Advancing(x) -> Penniless(x))\nforall x (Inst(x) and Momentary(x) -> Penniless(x))\nAntithetic(kalie) -> Momentary(kalie)\nforall x (Penniless(x) -> Mobile(x))\nforall x (Mobile(x) -> Inst(x))\nforall x (Mobile(x) -> Penniless(x))\nforall x (Advancing(x) and Penniless(x) -> Momentary(x))\nforall x (Mobile(x) -> Antithetic(x))\n\nnot Thieving(kalie)\n\nnot Thieving(kalie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Edouard is unforceful. Edouard is stationary. Edouard is above. Madalyn is endemical. Madalyn is unforceful. Madalyn is spinnable. Madalyn is jocose. Madalyn is stationary. Madalyn is above. Madalyn is pent. Bonni is endemical. Bonni is jocose. Bonni is above. Starlene is jocose. Starlene is above. All jocose, endemical people are pent. If someone is above and stationary then they are pent. If Starlene is jocose then Starlene is stationary. White people are spinnable. Kind people are above. If someone is spinnable then they are pent. All endemical, pent people are stationary. All spinnable people are jocose. Edouard is endemical.", "logic": "\nUnforceful(edouard)\nStationary(edouard)\nAbove(edouard)\nEndemical(madalyn)\nUnforceful(madalyn)\nSpinnable(madalyn)\nJocose(madalyn)\nStationary(madalyn)\nAbove(madalyn)\nPent(madalyn)\nEndemical(bonni)\nJocose(bonni)\nAbove(bonni)\nJocose(starlene)\nAbove(starlene)\nforall x (Jocose(x) and Endemical(x) -> Pent(x))\nforall x (Above(x) and Stationary(x) -> Pent(x))\nJocose(starlene) -> Stationary(starlene)\nforall x (Pent(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> Above(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> Pent(x))\nforall x (Endemical(x) and Pent(x) -> Stationary(x))\nforall x (Spinnable(x) -> Jocose(x))\n\nEndemical(edouard)\n\nEndemical(edouard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Wyndham is aortal. Wyndham is verified. Wyndham is discoidal. Thurstan is vaned. Thurstan is aortal. Thurstan is thirty. Thurstan is becoming. Thurstan is verified. Thurstan is discoidal. Thurstan is unfaceted. Woodrow is vaned. Woodrow is becoming. Woodrow is discoidal. Arlina is becoming. Arlina is discoidal. All becoming, vaned people are unfaceted. If someone is discoidal and verified then they are unfaceted. If Arlina is becoming then Arlina is verified. White people are thirty. Kind people are discoidal. If someone is thirty then they are unfaceted. All vaned, unfaceted people are verified. All thirty people are becoming. Arlina is not vaned.", "logic": "\nAortal(wyndham)\nVerified(wyndham)\nDiscoidal(wyndham)\nVaned(thurstan)\nAortal(thurstan)\nThirty(thurstan)\nBecoming(thurstan)\nVerified(thurstan)\nDiscoidal(thurstan)\nUnfaceted(thurstan)\nVaned(woodrow)\nBecoming(woodrow)\nDiscoidal(woodrow)\nBecoming(arlina)\nDiscoidal(arlina)\nforall x (Becoming(x) and Vaned(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Discoidal(x) and Verified(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nBecoming(arlina) -> Verified(arlina)\nforall x (Unfaceted(x) -> Thirty(x))\nforall x (Thirty(x) -> Discoidal(x))\nforall x (Thirty(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Vaned(x) and Unfaceted(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Thirty(x) -> Becoming(x))\n\nnot Vaned(arlina)\n\nnot Vaned(arlina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Orrin is telluric. Orrin is unlabelled. Orrin is hypodermic. Silvanus is scowling. Silvanus is telluric. Silvanus is agnostical. Silvanus is gordian. Silvanus is unlabelled. Silvanus is hypodermic. Silvanus is undulate. Barbi is scowling. Barbi is gordian. Barbi is hypodermic. Sabra is gordian. Sabra is hypodermic. All gordian, scowling people are undulate. If someone is hypodermic and unlabelled then they are undulate. If Sabra is gordian then Sabra is unlabelled. White people are agnostical. Kind people are hypodermic. If someone is agnostical then they are undulate. All scowling, undulate people are unlabelled. All agnostical people are gordian. Barbi is telluric.", "logic": "\nTelluric(orrin)\nUnlabelled(orrin)\nHypodermic(orrin)\nScowling(silvanus)\nTelluric(silvanus)\nAgnostical(silvanus)\nGordian(silvanus)\nUnlabelled(silvanus)\nHypodermic(silvanus)\nUndulate(silvanus)\nScowling(barbi)\nGordian(barbi)\nHypodermic(barbi)\nGordian(sabra)\nHypodermic(sabra)\nforall x (Gordian(x) and Scowling(x) -> Undulate(x))\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) and Unlabelled(x) -> Undulate(x))\nGordian(sabra) -> Unlabelled(sabra)\nforall x (Undulate(x) -> Agnostical(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Hypodermic(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Undulate(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Undulate(x) -> Unlabelled(x))\nforall x (Agnostical(x) -> Gordian(x))\n\nTelluric(barbi)\n\nTelluric(barbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-990"} {"premises": "Lem is parietal. Sarge is lovelorn. Jerrylee is optic. Jenilee is optic. If Sarge is hierarchic then Sarge is lovelorn. If something is lovelorn then it is hierarchic. All lovelorn, optic things are not hierarchic. If something is agamous and pixilated then it is lovelorn. All hierarchic, parietal things are lovelorn. If something is pixilated and not parietal then it is errhine. All hierarchic things are errhine. All errhine things are agamous. Jenilee is optic.", "logic": "\nParietal(lem)\nLovelorn(sarge)\nOptic(jerrylee)\nOptic(jenilee)\nHierarchic(sarge) -> Lovelorn(sarge)\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Optic(x) -> not Hierarchic(x))\nforall x (Agamous(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Parietal(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\nforall x (Pixilated(x) and not Parietal(x) -> Errhine(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) -> Errhine(x))\nforall x (Errhine(x) -> Agamous(x))\n\nOptic(jenilee)\n\ntherefore Optic(jenilee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Xavier is festal. Matthus is uncleanly. Modestia is bankable. Freemon is bankable. If Matthus is homesick then Matthus is uncleanly. If something is uncleanly then it is homesick. All uncleanly, bankable things are not homesick. If something is argive and acerbic then it is uncleanly. All homesick, festal things are uncleanly. If something is acerbic and not festal then it is eighteen. All homesick things are eighteen. All eighteen things are argive. Modestia is not bankable.", "logic": "\nFestal(xavier)\nUncleanly(matthus)\nBankable(modestia)\nBankable(freemon)\nHomesick(matthus) -> Uncleanly(matthus)\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) -> Homesick(x))\nforall x (Uncleanly(x) and Bankable(x) -> not Homesick(x))\nforall x (Argive(x) and Acerbic(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\nforall x (Homesick(x) and Festal(x) -> Uncleanly(x))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) and not Festal(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Argive(x))\n\nnot Bankable(modestia)\n\ntherefore Bankable(modestia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Mohamed is multiplied. Othilie is colonnaded. Berkley is benthic. Dacey is benthic. If Othilie is sunburned then Othilie is colonnaded. If something is colonnaded then it is sunburned. All colonnaded, benthic things are not sunburned. If something is anadromous and like then it is colonnaded. All sunburned, multiplied things are colonnaded. If something is like and not multiplied then it is biaxate. All sunburned things are biaxate. All biaxate things are anadromous. Othilie is sunburned.", "logic": "\nMultiplied(mohamed)\nColonnaded(othilie)\nBenthic(berkley)\nBenthic(dacey)\nSunburned(othilie) -> Colonnaded(othilie)\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) -> Sunburned(x))\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) and Benthic(x) -> not Sunburned(x))\nforall x (Anadromous(x) and Like(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) and Multiplied(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Like(x) and not Multiplied(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Sunburned(x) -> Biaxate(x))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> Anadromous(x))\n\nSunburned(othilie)\n\nColonnaded(othilie) and forall x (Colonnaded(x) -> Sunburned(x)) -> therefore Sunburned(othilie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Pryce is jailed. Ginger is chaldee. Ladonna is couthie. Timothea is couthie. If Ginger is buckram then Ginger is chaldee. If something is chaldee then it is buckram. All chaldee, couthie things are not buckram. If something is eightpenny and cultivated then it is chaldee. All buckram, jailed things are chaldee. If something is cultivated and not jailed then it is mitigative. All buckram things are mitigative. All mitigative things are eightpenny. Ginger is not buckram.", "logic": "\nJailed(pryce)\nChaldee(ginger)\nCouthie(ladonna)\nCouthie(timothea)\nBuckram(ginger) -> Chaldee(ginger)\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Buckram(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) and Couthie(x) -> not Buckram(x))\nforall x (Eightpenny(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Buckram(x) and Jailed(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and not Jailed(x) -> Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Mitigative(x) -> Eightpenny(x))\n\nnot Buckram(ginger)\n\nChaldee(ginger) and forall x (Chaldee(x) -> Buckram(x)) -> therefore Buckram(ginger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Berte is scorbutic. Olenka is meticulous. Koren is motorised. Nena is motorised. If Olenka is workable then Olenka is meticulous. If something is meticulous then it is workable. All meticulous, motorised things are not workable. If something is incident and implike then it is meticulous. All workable, scorbutic things are meticulous. If something is implike and not scorbutic then it is prenominal. All workable things are prenominal. All prenominal things are incident. Olenka is prenominal.", "logic": "\nScorbutic(berte)\nMeticulous(olenka)\nMotorised(koren)\nMotorised(nena)\nWorkable(olenka) -> Meticulous(olenka)\nforall x (Meticulous(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Meticulous(x) and Motorised(x) -> not Workable(x))\nforall x (Incident(x) and Implike(x) -> Meticulous(x))\nforall x (Workable(x) and Scorbutic(x) -> Meticulous(x))\nforall x (Implike(x) and not Scorbutic(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Workable(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Incident(x))\n\nPrenominal(olenka)\n\nMeticulous(olenka) and forall x (Meticulous(x) -> Workable(x)) -> therefore Workable(olenka) Workable(olenka) and forall x (Workable(x) -> Prenominal(x)) -> therefore Prenominal(olenka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Roshelle is southbound. Thelma is nominated. Ricardo is strange. Gypsy is strange. If Thelma is privy then Thelma is nominated. If something is nominated then it is privy. All nominated, strange things are not privy. If something is overactive and gaudy then it is nominated. All privy, southbound things are nominated. If something is gaudy and not southbound then it is slovakian. All privy things are slovakian. All slovakian things are overactive. Thelma is not slovakian.", "logic": "\nSouthbound(roshelle)\nNominated(thelma)\nStrange(ricardo)\nStrange(gypsy)\nPrivy(thelma) -> Nominated(thelma)\nforall x (Nominated(x) -> Privy(x))\nforall x (Nominated(x) and Strange(x) -> not Privy(x))\nforall x (Overactive(x) and Gaudy(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) and Southbound(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and not Southbound(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Privy(x) -> Slovakian(x))\nforall x (Slovakian(x) -> Overactive(x))\n\nnot Slovakian(thelma)\n\nNominated(thelma) and forall x (Nominated(x) -> Privy(x)) -> therefore Privy(thelma) Privy(thelma) and forall x (Privy(x) -> Slovakian(x)) -> therefore Slovakian(thelma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Katha is humped. Graehme is reclaimed. Wait is aphaeretic. Audrye is aphaeretic. If Graehme is unlocked then Graehme is reclaimed. If something is reclaimed then it is unlocked. All reclaimed, aphaeretic things are not unlocked. If something is lifesize and ringleted then it is reclaimed. All unlocked, humped things are reclaimed. If something is ringleted and not humped then it is reputable. All unlocked things are reputable. All reputable things are lifesize. Graehme is lifesize.", "logic": "\nHumped(katha)\nReclaimed(graehme)\nAphaeretic(wait)\nAphaeretic(audrye)\nUnlocked(graehme) -> Reclaimed(graehme)\nforall x (Reclaimed(x) -> Unlocked(x))\nforall x (Reclaimed(x) and Aphaeretic(x) -> not Unlocked(x))\nforall x (Lifesize(x) and Ringleted(x) -> Reclaimed(x))\nforall x (Unlocked(x) and Humped(x) -> Reclaimed(x))\nforall x (Ringleted(x) and not Humped(x) -> Reputable(x))\nforall x (Unlocked(x) -> Reputable(x))\nforall x (Reputable(x) -> Lifesize(x))\n\nLifesize(graehme)\n\nReclaimed(graehme) and forall x (Reclaimed(x) -> Unlocked(x)) -> therefore Unlocked(graehme) Unlocked(graehme) and forall x (Unlocked(x) -> Reputable(x)) -> therefore Reputable(graehme) Reputable(graehme) and forall x (Reputable(x) -> Lifesize(x)) -> therefore Lifesize(graehme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Lon is banded. Marji is frumpy. Charlena is inodorous. Madel is inodorous. If Marji is anthropoid then Marji is frumpy. If something is frumpy then it is anthropoid. All frumpy, inodorous things are not anthropoid. If something is sporty and handsome then it is frumpy. All anthropoid, banded things are frumpy. If something is handsome and not banded then it is splashed. All anthropoid things are splashed. All splashed things are sporty. Marji is not sporty.", "logic": "\nBanded(lon)\nFrumpy(marji)\nInodorous(charlena)\nInodorous(madel)\nAnthropoid(marji) -> Frumpy(marji)\nforall x (Frumpy(x) -> Anthropoid(x))\nforall x (Frumpy(x) and Inodorous(x) -> not Anthropoid(x))\nforall x (Sporty(x) and Handsome(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nforall x (Anthropoid(x) and Banded(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nforall x (Handsome(x) and not Banded(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Anthropoid(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Splashed(x) -> Sporty(x))\n\nnot Sporty(marji)\n\nFrumpy(marji) and forall x (Frumpy(x) -> Anthropoid(x)) -> therefore Anthropoid(marji) Anthropoid(marji) and forall x (Anthropoid(x) -> Splashed(x)) -> therefore Splashed(marji) Splashed(marji) and forall x (Splashed(x) -> Sporty(x)) -> therefore Sporty(marji)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Nathanael is terrified. Grover is unnotched. Mable is assonant. Danelle is assonant. If Grover is grudging then Grover is unnotched. If something is unnotched then it is grudging. All unnotched, assonant things are not grudging. If something is hierarchic and welfarist then it is unnotched. All grudging, terrified things are unnotched. If something is welfarist and not terrified then it is aslant. All grudging things are aslant. All aslant things are hierarchic. Mable is not unnotched.", "logic": "\nTerrified(nathanael)\nUnnotched(grover)\nAssonant(mable)\nAssonant(danelle)\nGrudging(grover) -> Unnotched(grover)\nforall x (Unnotched(x) -> Grudging(x))\nforall x (Unnotched(x) and Assonant(x) -> not Grudging(x))\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Welfarist(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Grudging(x) and Terrified(x) -> Unnotched(x))\nforall x (Welfarist(x) and not Terrified(x) -> Aslant(x))\nforall x (Grudging(x) -> Aslant(x))\nforall x (Aslant(x) -> Hierarchic(x))\n\nnot Unnotched(mable)\n\nforall x (Hierarchic(x) and Welfarist(x) -> Unnotched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Marla is resistible. Ardyth is reassured. Jacenta is daughterly. Georgina is daughterly. If Ardyth is intensive then Ardyth is reassured. If something is reassured then it is intensive. All reassured, daughterly things are not intensive. If something is haughty and pebbly then it is reassured. All intensive, resistible things are reassured. If something is pebbly and not resistible then it is truculent. All intensive things are truculent. All truculent things are haughty. Marla is reassured.", "logic": "\nResistible(marla)\nReassured(ardyth)\nDaughterly(jacenta)\nDaughterly(georgina)\nIntensive(ardyth) -> Reassured(ardyth)\nforall x (Reassured(x) -> Intensive(x))\nforall x (Reassured(x) and Daughterly(x) -> not Intensive(x))\nforall x (Haughty(x) and Pebbly(x) -> Reassured(x))\nforall x (Intensive(x) and Resistible(x) -> Reassured(x))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) and not Resistible(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Intensive(x) -> Truculent(x))\nforall x (Truculent(x) -> Haughty(x))\n\nReassured(marla)\n\nforall x (Intensive(x) and Resistible(x) -> Reassured(x)) <- forall x (Reassured(x) -> Intensive(x)) <- forall x (Haughty(x) and Pebbly(x) -> Reassured(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Anthony is algonquin. Lloyd is coccal. Gardener is veteran. Brynn is veteran. If Lloyd is unliveable then Lloyd is coccal. If something is coccal then it is unliveable. All coccal, veteran things are not unliveable. If something is bacchic and prosthetic then it is coccal. All unliveable, algonquin things are coccal. If something is prosthetic and not algonquin then it is basidial. All unliveable things are basidial. All basidial things are bacchic. Gardener is not unliveable.", "logic": "\nAlgonquin(anthony)\nCoccal(lloyd)\nVeteran(gardener)\nVeteran(brynn)\nUnliveable(lloyd) -> Coccal(lloyd)\nforall x (Coccal(x) -> Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Coccal(x) and Veteran(x) -> not Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Bacchic(x) and Prosthetic(x) -> Coccal(x))\nforall x (Unliveable(x) and Algonquin(x) -> Coccal(x))\nforall x (Prosthetic(x) and not Algonquin(x) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Unliveable(x) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Bacchic(x))\n\nnot Unliveable(gardener)\n\nforall x (Coccal(x) -> Unliveable(x)) <- forall x (Bacchic(x) and Prosthetic(x) -> Coccal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Dirk is emphasized. Kalie is hostile. Brandea is sizeable. Wayne is sizeable. If Kalie is penal then Kalie is hostile. If something is hostile then it is penal. All hostile, sizeable things are not penal. If something is laughable and acceptable then it is hostile. All penal, emphasized things are hostile. If something is acceptable and not emphasized then it is spavined. All penal things are spavined. All spavined things are laughable. Dirk is spavined.", "logic": "\nEmphasized(dirk)\nHostile(kalie)\nSizeable(brandea)\nSizeable(wayne)\nPenal(kalie) -> Hostile(kalie)\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Penal(x))\nforall x (Hostile(x) and Sizeable(x) -> not Penal(x))\nforall x (Laughable(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Penal(x) and Emphasized(x) -> Hostile(x))\nforall x (Acceptable(x) and not Emphasized(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Spavined(x))\nforall x (Spavined(x) -> Laughable(x))\n\nSpavined(dirk)\n\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Spavined(x)) <- forall x (Hostile(x) -> Penal(x)) <- forall x (Laughable(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Hostile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Natalia is ideational. Dahlia is upsetting. Herta is barytic. Cicely is barytic. If Dahlia is adaptative then Dahlia is upsetting. If something is upsetting then it is adaptative. All upsetting, barytic things are not adaptative. If something is trendy and inaugural then it is upsetting. All adaptative, ideational things are upsetting. If something is inaugural and not ideational then it is ataxic. All adaptative things are ataxic. All ataxic things are trendy. Natalia is not barytic.", "logic": "\nIdeational(natalia)\nUpsetting(dahlia)\nBarytic(herta)\nBarytic(cicely)\nAdaptative(dahlia) -> Upsetting(dahlia)\nforall x (Upsetting(x) -> Adaptative(x))\nforall x (Upsetting(x) and Barytic(x) -> not Adaptative(x))\nforall x (Trendy(x) and Inaugural(x) -> Upsetting(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and Ideational(x) -> Upsetting(x))\nforall x (Inaugural(x) and not Ideational(x) -> Ataxic(x))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) -> Ataxic(x))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) -> Trendy(x))\n\nnot Barytic(natalia)\n\nnot Barytic(natalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Ursola is beaming. Kassia is bituminoid. Sioux is tested. Lynde is tested. If Kassia is bigger then Kassia is bituminoid. If something is bituminoid then it is bigger. All bituminoid, tested things are not bigger. If something is coplanar and female then it is bituminoid. All bigger, beaming things are bituminoid. If something is female and not beaming then it is bathetic. All bigger things are bathetic. All bathetic things are coplanar. Sioux is beaming.", "logic": "\nBeaming(ursola)\nBituminoid(kassia)\nTested(sioux)\nTested(lynde)\nBigger(kassia) -> Bituminoid(kassia)\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) -> Bigger(x))\nforall x (Bituminoid(x) and Tested(x) -> not Bigger(x))\nforall x (Coplanar(x) and Female(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) and Beaming(x) -> Bituminoid(x))\nforall x (Female(x) and not Beaming(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Bathetic(x))\nforall x (Bathetic(x) -> Coplanar(x))\n\nBeaming(sioux)\n\nBeaming(sioux) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Mignon is afoot. Myrtie is inured. Carl is unsightly. Sven is unsightly. If Myrtie is undying then Myrtie is inured. If something is inured then it is undying. All inured, unsightly things are not undying. If something is franciscan and scotch then it is inured. All undying, afoot things are inured. If something is scotch and not afoot then it is solo. All undying things are solo. All solo things are franciscan. Mignon is not scotch.", "logic": "\nAfoot(mignon)\nInured(myrtie)\nUnsightly(carl)\nUnsightly(sven)\nUndying(myrtie) -> Inured(myrtie)\nforall x (Inured(x) -> Undying(x))\nforall x (Inured(x) and Unsightly(x) -> not Undying(x))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) and Scotch(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Undying(x) and Afoot(x) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Scotch(x) and not Afoot(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Undying(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Solo(x) -> Franciscan(x))\n\nnot Scotch(mignon)\n\nnot Scotch(mignon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "Hastings is chaetal. Stephan is hatted. Vasili is aboulic. Babara is aboulic. If Stephan is deluxe then Stephan is hatted. If something is hatted then it is deluxe. All hatted, aboulic things are not deluxe. If something is waspish and editorial then it is hatted. All deluxe, chaetal things are hatted. If something is editorial and not chaetal then it is parched. All deluxe things are parched. All parched things are waspish. Vasili is editorial.", "logic": "\nChaetal(hastings)\nHatted(stephan)\nAboulic(vasili)\nAboulic(babara)\nDeluxe(stephan) -> Hatted(stephan)\nforall x (Hatted(x) -> Deluxe(x))\nforall x (Hatted(x) and Aboulic(x) -> not Deluxe(x))\nforall x (Waspish(x) and Editorial(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) and Chaetal(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Editorial(x) and not Chaetal(x) -> Parched(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) -> Parched(x))\nforall x (Parched(x) -> Waspish(x))\n\nEditorial(vasili)\n\nEditorial(vasili) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-879"} {"premises": "The micky is threadlike. If something is rhythmic then it is deliberate. All deliberate things are tangible. If the micky is deliberate and the micky is actual then the micky is tangible. All threadlike things are rhythmic. If the micky is rhythmic then the micky is threadlike. All tangible things are actual. The micky is threadlike.", "logic": "\nThreadlike(micky)\nforall x (Rhythmic(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Tangible(x))\nDeliberate(micky) and Actual(micky) -> Tangible(micky)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) -> Rhythmic(x))\nRhythmic(micky) -> Threadlike(micky)\nforall x (Tangible(x) -> Actual(x))\n\nThreadlike(micky)\n\ntherefore Threadlike(micky)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The janie is salvific. If something is indentured then it is express. All express things are valorous. If the janie is express and the janie is saintlike then the janie is valorous. All salvific things are indentured. If the janie is indentured then the janie is salvific. All valorous things are saintlike. The janie is not salvific.", "logic": "\nSalvific(janie)\nforall x (Indentured(x) -> Express(x))\nforall x (Express(x) -> Valorous(x))\nExpress(janie) and Saintlike(janie) -> Valorous(janie)\nforall x (Salvific(x) -> Indentured(x))\nIndentured(janie) -> Salvific(janie)\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> Saintlike(x))\n\nnot Salvific(janie)\n\ntherefore Salvific(janie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The laurene is unshared. If something is poriferous then it is sparse. All sparse things are aerobiotic. If the laurene is sparse and the laurene is natal then the laurene is aerobiotic. All unshared things are poriferous. If the laurene is poriferous then the laurene is unshared. All aerobiotic things are natal. The laurene is poriferous.", "logic": "\nUnshared(laurene)\nforall x (Poriferous(x) -> Sparse(x))\nforall x (Sparse(x) -> Aerobiotic(x))\nSparse(laurene) and Natal(laurene) -> Aerobiotic(laurene)\nforall x (Unshared(x) -> Poriferous(x))\nPoriferous(laurene) -> Unshared(laurene)\nforall x (Aerobiotic(x) -> Natal(x))\n\nPoriferous(laurene)\n\nUnshared(laurene) and forall x (Unshared(x) -> Poriferous(x)) -> therefore Poriferous(laurene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The bendite is quick. If something is roomy then it is corneous. All corneous things are hexed. If the bendite is corneous and the bendite is cheerful then the bendite is hexed. All quick things are roomy. If the bendite is roomy then the bendite is quick. All hexed things are cheerful. The bendite is not roomy.", "logic": "\nQuick(bendite)\nforall x (Roomy(x) -> Corneous(x))\nforall x (Corneous(x) -> Hexed(x))\nCorneous(bendite) and Cheerful(bendite) -> Hexed(bendite)\nforall x (Quick(x) -> Roomy(x))\nRoomy(bendite) -> Quick(bendite)\nforall x (Hexed(x) -> Cheerful(x))\n\nnot Roomy(bendite)\n\nQuick(bendite) and forall x (Quick(x) -> Roomy(x)) -> therefore Roomy(bendite)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The mariele is toilsome. If something is abounding then it is reported. All reported things are exempt. If the mariele is reported and the mariele is heady then the mariele is exempt. All toilsome things are abounding. If the mariele is abounding then the mariele is toilsome. All exempt things are heady. The mariele is reported.", "logic": "\nToilsome(mariele)\nforall x (Abounding(x) -> Reported(x))\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Exempt(x))\nReported(mariele) and Heady(mariele) -> Exempt(mariele)\nforall x (Toilsome(x) -> Abounding(x))\nAbounding(mariele) -> Toilsome(mariele)\nforall x (Exempt(x) -> Heady(x))\n\nReported(mariele)\n\nToilsome(mariele) and forall x (Toilsome(x) -> Abounding(x)) -> therefore Abounding(mariele) Abounding(mariele) and forall x (Abounding(x) -> Reported(x)) -> therefore Reported(mariele)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The ginger is important. If something is dwindling then it is shrewd. All shrewd things are mystical. If the ginger is shrewd and the ginger is briefless then the ginger is mystical. All important things are dwindling. If the ginger is dwindling then the ginger is important. All mystical things are briefless. The ginger is not shrewd.", "logic": "\nImportant(ginger)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> Shrewd(x))\nforall x (Shrewd(x) -> Mystical(x))\nShrewd(ginger) and Briefless(ginger) -> Mystical(ginger)\nforall x (Important(x) -> Dwindling(x))\nDwindling(ginger) -> Important(ginger)\nforall x (Mystical(x) -> Briefless(x))\n\nnot Shrewd(ginger)\n\nImportant(ginger) and forall x (Important(x) -> Dwindling(x)) -> therefore Dwindling(ginger) Dwindling(ginger) and forall x (Dwindling(x) -> Shrewd(x)) -> therefore Shrewd(ginger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The matteo is cutaneous. If something is nodulose then it is filmed. All filmed things are deweyan. If the matteo is filmed and the matteo is genetic then the matteo is deweyan. All cutaneous things are nodulose. If the matteo is nodulose then the matteo is cutaneous. All deweyan things are genetic. The matteo is deweyan.", "logic": "\nCutaneous(matteo)\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Filmed(x))\nforall x (Filmed(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nFilmed(matteo) and Genetic(matteo) -> Deweyan(matteo)\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Nodulose(x))\nNodulose(matteo) -> Cutaneous(matteo)\nforall x (Deweyan(x) -> Genetic(x))\n\nDeweyan(matteo)\n\nCutaneous(matteo) and forall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Nodulose(x)) -> therefore Nodulose(matteo) Nodulose(matteo) and forall x (Nodulose(x) -> Filmed(x)) -> therefore Filmed(matteo) Filmed(matteo) and forall x (Filmed(x) -> Deweyan(x)) -> therefore Deweyan(matteo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The rachael is reported. If something is astylar then it is cattish. All cattish things are radial. If the rachael is cattish and the rachael is divinatory then the rachael is radial. All reported things are astylar. If the rachael is astylar then the rachael is reported. All radial things are divinatory. The rachael is not radial.", "logic": "\nReported(rachael)\nforall x (Astylar(x) -> Cattish(x))\nforall x (Cattish(x) -> Radial(x))\nCattish(rachael) and Divinatory(rachael) -> Radial(rachael)\nforall x (Reported(x) -> Astylar(x))\nAstylar(rachael) -> Reported(rachael)\nforall x (Radial(x) -> Divinatory(x))\n\nnot Radial(rachael)\n\nReported(rachael) and forall x (Reported(x) -> Astylar(x)) -> therefore Astylar(rachael) Astylar(rachael) and forall x (Astylar(x) -> Cattish(x)) -> therefore Cattish(rachael) Cattish(rachael) and forall x (Cattish(x) -> Radial(x)) -> therefore Radial(rachael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The siouxie is wanting. If something is diocesan then it is halting. All halting things are chromatic. If the siouxie is halting and the siouxie is wheaten then the siouxie is chromatic. All wanting things are diocesan. If the siouxie is diocesan then the siouxie is wanting. All chromatic things are wheaten. The siouxie does not visit the siouxie.", "logic": "\nWanting(siouxie)\nforall x (Diocesan(x) -> Halting(x))\nforall x (Halting(x) -> Chromatic(x))\nHalting(siouxie) and Wheaten(siouxie) -> Chromatic(siouxie)\nforall x (Wanting(x) -> Diocesan(x))\nDiocesan(siouxie) -> Wanting(siouxie)\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Wheaten(x))\n\nnot Visits(siouxie, siouxie)\n\nnot Visits(siouxie, siouxie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The sting is rootbound. If something is unisexual then it is woollen. All woollen things are sebaceous. If the sting is woollen and the sting is bumpkinly then the sting is sebaceous. All rootbound things are unisexual. If the sting is unisexual then the sting is rootbound. All sebaceous things are bumpkinly. The sting needs the sting.", "logic": "\nRootbound(sting)\nforall x (Unisexual(x) -> Woollen(x))\nforall x (Woollen(x) -> Sebaceous(x))\nWoollen(sting) and Bumpkinly(sting) -> Sebaceous(sting)\nforall x (Rootbound(x) -> Unisexual(x))\nUnisexual(sting) -> Rootbound(sting)\nforall x (Sebaceous(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\n\nNeeds(sting, sting)\n\nNeeds(sting, sting) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-335"} {"premises": "The derek is not quartzose. The derek is not bluff. The derek sediment the sherwynd. The sam breathe the sherwynd. The sam is bluff. The sherwynd breathe the derek. The sherwynd breathe the sam. The sherwynd is brambly. The sherwynd is quartzose. The sherwynd is carinate. The sherwynd does not like the derek. The sherwynd fling the sam. If someone sediment the sam and they do not see the derek then the derek is not bluff. If someone breathe the sam and the sam is brambly then the sam breathe the sherwynd. If someone breathe the derek then they see the sherwynd. If someone is quartzose and they see the sherwynd then the sherwynd is prototypic. If someone breathe the derek then they are quartzose. If someone breathe the sam and they are prototypic then the sam does not chase the derek. The derek is not bluff.", "logic": "\nnot Quartzose(derek)\nnot Bluff(derek)\nSediment(derek, sherwynd)\nBreathe(sam, sherwynd)\nBluff(sam)\nBreathe(sherwynd, derek)\nBreathe(sherwynd, sam)\nBrambly(sherwynd)\nQuartzose(sherwynd)\nCarinate(sherwynd)\nnot Sediment(sherwynd, derek)\nFling(sherwynd, sam)\nforall x (Sediment(x, sam) and not Fling(x, derek) -> not Bluff(derek))\nforall x (Breathe(x, sam) and Brambly(sam) -> Breathe(sam, sherwynd))\nforall x (Breathe(x, derek) -> Fling(x, sherwynd))\nforall x (Quartzose(x) and Fling(x, sherwynd) -> Prototypic(sherwynd))\nforall x (Breathe(x, derek) -> Quartzose(x))\nforall x (Breathe(x, sam) and Prototypic(x) -> not Breathe(sam, derek))\n\nnot Bluff(derek)\n\ntherefore not Bluff(derek)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The gregor is not nitrous. The gregor is not unaired. The gregor ante the anatoly. The allyn piss the anatoly. The allyn is unaired. The anatoly piss the gregor. The anatoly piss the allyn. The anatoly is socialised. The anatoly is nitrous. The anatoly is adust. The anatoly does not like the gregor. The anatoly embargo the allyn. If someone ante the allyn and they do not see the gregor then the gregor is not unaired. If someone piss the allyn and the allyn is socialised then the allyn piss the anatoly. If someone piss the gregor then they see the anatoly. If someone is nitrous and they see the anatoly then the anatoly is spavined. If someone piss the gregor then they are nitrous. If someone piss the allyn and they are spavined then the allyn does not chase the gregor. The anatoly is not socialised.", "logic": "\nnot Nitrous(gregor)\nnot Unaired(gregor)\nAnte(gregor, anatoly)\nPiss(allyn, anatoly)\nUnaired(allyn)\nPiss(anatoly, gregor)\nPiss(anatoly, allyn)\nSocialised(anatoly)\nNitrous(anatoly)\nAdust(anatoly)\nnot Ante(anatoly, gregor)\nEmbargo(anatoly, allyn)\nforall x (Ante(x, allyn) and not Embargo(x, gregor) -> not Unaired(gregor))\nforall x (Piss(x, allyn) and Socialised(allyn) -> Piss(allyn, anatoly))\nforall x (Piss(x, gregor) -> Embargo(x, anatoly))\nforall x (Nitrous(x) and Embargo(x, anatoly) -> Spavined(anatoly))\nforall x (Piss(x, gregor) -> Nitrous(x))\nforall x (Piss(x, allyn) and Spavined(x) -> not Piss(allyn, gregor))\n\nnot Socialised(anatoly)\n\ntherefore Socialised(anatoly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The iain is not cursorial. The iain is not looking. The iain schematize the janka. The nola deliver the janka. The nola is looking. The janka deliver the iain. The janka deliver the nola. The janka is capacious. The janka is cursorial. The janka is unsanitary. The janka does not like the iain. The janka pigment the nola. If someone schematize the nola and they do not see the iain then the iain is not looking. If someone deliver the nola and the nola is capacious then the nola deliver the janka. If someone deliver the iain then they see the janka. If someone is cursorial and they see the janka then the janka is insoluble. If someone deliver the iain then they are cursorial. If someone deliver the nola and they are insoluble then the nola does not chase the iain. The janka pigment the janka.", "logic": "\nnot Cursorial(iain)\nnot Looking(iain)\nSchematize(iain, janka)\nDeliver(nola, janka)\nLooking(nola)\nDeliver(janka, iain)\nDeliver(janka, nola)\nCapacious(janka)\nCursorial(janka)\nUnsanitary(janka)\nnot Schematize(janka, iain)\nPigment(janka, nola)\nforall x (Schematize(x, nola) and not Pigment(x, iain) -> not Looking(iain))\nforall x (Deliver(x, nola) and Capacious(nola) -> Deliver(nola, janka))\nforall x (Deliver(x, iain) -> Pigment(x, janka))\nforall x (Cursorial(x) and Pigment(x, janka) -> Insoluble(janka))\nforall x (Deliver(x, iain) -> Cursorial(x))\nforall x (Deliver(x, nola) and Insoluble(x) -> not Deliver(nola, iain))\n\nPigment(janka, janka)\n\nDeliver(janka, iain) and forall x (Deliver(x, iain) -> Pigment(x, janka)) -> therefore Pigment(janka, janka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The skipper is not xxxiii. The skipper is not macaronic. The skipper disbar the jolie. The sergeant favor the jolie. The sergeant is macaronic. The jolie favor the skipper. The jolie favor the sergeant. The jolie is disguised. The jolie is xxxiii. The jolie is undismayed. The jolie does not like the skipper. The jolie esteem the sergeant. If someone disbar the sergeant and they do not see the skipper then the skipper is not macaronic. If someone favor the sergeant and the sergeant is disguised then the sergeant favor the jolie. If someone favor the skipper then they see the jolie. If someone is xxxiii and they see the jolie then the jolie is disposed. If someone favor the skipper then they are xxxiii. If someone favor the sergeant and they are disposed then the sergeant does not chase the skipper. The jolie does not see the jolie.", "logic": "\nnot Xxxiii(skipper)\nnot Macaronic(skipper)\nDisbar(skipper, jolie)\nFavor(sergeant, jolie)\nMacaronic(sergeant)\nFavor(jolie, skipper)\nFavor(jolie, sergeant)\nDisguised(jolie)\nXxxiii(jolie)\nUndismayed(jolie)\nnot Disbar(jolie, skipper)\nEsteem(jolie, sergeant)\nforall x (Disbar(x, sergeant) and not Esteem(x, skipper) -> not Macaronic(skipper))\nforall x (Favor(x, sergeant) and Disguised(sergeant) -> Favor(sergeant, jolie))\nforall x (Favor(x, skipper) -> Esteem(x, jolie))\nforall x (Xxxiii(x) and Esteem(x, jolie) -> Disposed(jolie))\nforall x (Favor(x, skipper) -> Xxxiii(x))\nforall x (Favor(x, sergeant) and Disposed(x) -> not Favor(sergeant, skipper))\n\nnot Esteem(jolie, jolie)\n\nFavor(jolie, skipper) and forall x (Favor(x, skipper) -> Esteem(x, jolie)) -> therefore Esteem(jolie, jolie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The tye is not altruistic. The tye is not unnameable. The tye stockade the clarette. The alina detick the clarette. The alina is unnameable. The clarette detick the tye. The clarette detick the alina. The clarette is lowbred. The clarette is altruistic. The clarette is thespian. The clarette does not like the tye. The clarette tumesce the alina. If someone stockade the alina and they do not see the tye then the tye is not unnameable. If someone detick the alina and the alina is lowbred then the alina detick the clarette. If someone detick the tye then they see the clarette. If someone is altruistic and they see the clarette then the clarette is whiskered. If someone detick the tye then they are altruistic. If someone detick the alina and they are whiskered then the alina does not chase the tye. The clarette is whiskered.", "logic": "\nnot Altruistic(tye)\nnot Unnameable(tye)\nStockade(tye, clarette)\nDetick(alina, clarette)\nUnnameable(alina)\nDetick(clarette, tye)\nDetick(clarette, alina)\nLowbred(clarette)\nAltruistic(clarette)\nThespian(clarette)\nnot Stockade(clarette, tye)\nTumesce(clarette, alina)\nforall x (Stockade(x, alina) and not Tumesce(x, tye) -> not Unnameable(tye))\nforall x (Detick(x, alina) and Lowbred(alina) -> Detick(alina, clarette))\nforall x (Detick(x, tye) -> Tumesce(x, clarette))\nforall x (Altruistic(x) and Tumesce(x, clarette) -> Whiskered(clarette))\nforall x (Detick(x, tye) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Detick(x, alina) and Whiskered(x) -> not Detick(alina, tye))\n\nWhiskered(clarette)\n\nDetick(clarette, tye) and forall x (Detick(x, tye) -> Tumesce(x, clarette)) -> therefore Tumesce(clarette, clarette) Altruistic(clarette) and Tumesce(clarette, clarette) and forall x (Altruistic(x) and Tumesce(x, clarette) -> Whiskered(clarette)) -> therefore Whiskered(clarette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The cassy is not nonplused. The cassy is not nonexempt. The cassy convince the gilda. The cary outlaw the gilda. The cary is nonexempt. The gilda outlaw the cassy. The gilda outlaw the cary. The gilda is abducent. The gilda is nonplused. The gilda is distant. The gilda does not like the cassy. The gilda pettifog the cary. If someone convince the cary and they do not see the cassy then the cassy is not nonexempt. If someone outlaw the cary and the cary is abducent then the cary outlaw the gilda. If someone outlaw the cassy then they see the gilda. If someone is nonplused and they see the gilda then the gilda is vesicatory. If someone outlaw the cassy then they are nonplused. If someone outlaw the cary and they are vesicatory then the cary does not chase the cassy. The gilda is not vesicatory.", "logic": "\nnot Nonplused(cassy)\nnot Nonexempt(cassy)\nConvince(cassy, gilda)\nOutlaw(cary, gilda)\nNonexempt(cary)\nOutlaw(gilda, cassy)\nOutlaw(gilda, cary)\nAbducent(gilda)\nNonplused(gilda)\nDistant(gilda)\nnot Convince(gilda, cassy)\nPettifog(gilda, cary)\nforall x (Convince(x, cary) and not Pettifog(x, cassy) -> not Nonexempt(cassy))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, cary) and Abducent(cary) -> Outlaw(cary, gilda))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, cassy) -> Pettifog(x, gilda))\nforall x (Nonplused(x) and Pettifog(x, gilda) -> Vesicatory(gilda))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, cassy) -> Nonplused(x))\nforall x (Outlaw(x, cary) and Vesicatory(x) -> not Outlaw(cary, cassy))\n\nnot Vesicatory(gilda)\n\nOutlaw(gilda, cassy) and forall x (Outlaw(x, cassy) -> Pettifog(x, gilda)) -> therefore Pettifog(gilda, gilda) Nonplused(gilda) and Pettifog(gilda, gilda) and forall x (Nonplused(x) and Pettifog(x, gilda) -> Vesicatory(gilda)) -> therefore Vesicatory(gilda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The godiva is not iridic. The godiva is not uninominal. The godiva miscreate the vere. The luisa subrogate the vere. The luisa is uninominal. The vere subrogate the godiva. The vere subrogate the luisa. The vere is viral. The vere is iridic. The vere is light. The vere does not like the godiva. The vere dupe the luisa. If someone miscreate the luisa and they do not see the godiva then the godiva is not uninominal. If someone subrogate the luisa and the luisa is viral then the luisa subrogate the vere. If someone subrogate the godiva then they see the vere. If someone is iridic and they see the vere then the vere is decayable. If someone subrogate the godiva then they are iridic. If someone subrogate the luisa and they are decayable then the luisa does not chase the godiva. The luisa does not chase the godiva.", "logic": "\nnot Iridic(godiva)\nnot Uninominal(godiva)\nMiscreate(godiva, vere)\nSubrogate(luisa, vere)\nUninominal(luisa)\nSubrogate(vere, godiva)\nSubrogate(vere, luisa)\nViral(vere)\nIridic(vere)\nLight(vere)\nnot Miscreate(vere, godiva)\nDupe(vere, luisa)\nforall x (Miscreate(x, luisa) and not Dupe(x, godiva) -> not Uninominal(godiva))\nforall x (Subrogate(x, luisa) and Viral(luisa) -> Subrogate(luisa, vere))\nforall x (Subrogate(x, godiva) -> Dupe(x, vere))\nforall x (Iridic(x) and Dupe(x, vere) -> Decayable(vere))\nforall x (Subrogate(x, godiva) -> Iridic(x))\nforall x (Subrogate(x, luisa) and Decayable(x) -> not Subrogate(luisa, godiva))\n\nnot Subrogate(luisa, godiva)\n\nSubrogate(vere, godiva) and forall x (Subrogate(x, godiva) -> Dupe(x, vere)) -> therefore Dupe(vere, vere) Iridic(vere) and Dupe(vere, vere) and forall x (Iridic(x) and Dupe(x, vere) -> Decayable(vere)) -> therefore Decayable(vere) Subrogate(vere, luisa) and Decayable(vere) and forall x (Subrogate(x, luisa) and Decayable(x) -> not Subrogate(luisa, godiva)) -> therefore not Subrogate(luisa, godiva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The doll is not iambic. The doll is not baggy. The doll stuff the chadd. The modestia tell the chadd. The modestia is baggy. The chadd tell the doll. The chadd tell the modestia. The chadd is okay. The chadd is iambic. The chadd is nuclear. The chadd does not like the doll. The chadd tattoo the modestia. If someone stuff the modestia and they do not see the doll then the doll is not baggy. If someone tell the modestia and the modestia is okay then the modestia tell the chadd. If someone tell the doll then they see the chadd. If someone is iambic and they see the chadd then the chadd is unfruitful. If someone tell the doll then they are iambic. If someone tell the modestia and they are unfruitful then the modestia does not chase the doll. The modestia tell the doll.", "logic": "\nnot Iambic(doll)\nnot Baggy(doll)\nStuff(doll, chadd)\nTell(modestia, chadd)\nBaggy(modestia)\nTell(chadd, doll)\nTell(chadd, modestia)\nOkay(chadd)\nIambic(chadd)\nNuclear(chadd)\nnot Stuff(chadd, doll)\nTattoo(chadd, modestia)\nforall x (Stuff(x, modestia) and not Tattoo(x, doll) -> not Baggy(doll))\nforall x (Tell(x, modestia) and Okay(modestia) -> Tell(modestia, chadd))\nforall x (Tell(x, doll) -> Tattoo(x, chadd))\nforall x (Iambic(x) and Tattoo(x, chadd) -> Unfruitful(chadd))\nforall x (Tell(x, doll) -> Iambic(x))\nforall x (Tell(x, modestia) and Unfruitful(x) -> not Tell(modestia, doll))\n\nTell(modestia, doll)\n\nTell(chadd, doll) and forall x (Tell(x, doll) -> Tattoo(x, chadd)) -> therefore Tattoo(chadd, chadd) Iambic(chadd) and Tattoo(chadd, chadd) and forall x (Iambic(x) and Tattoo(x, chadd) -> Unfruitful(chadd)) -> therefore Unfruitful(chadd) Tell(chadd, modestia) and Unfruitful(chadd) and forall x (Tell(x, modestia) and Unfruitful(x) -> not Tell(modestia, doll)) -> therefore not Tell(modestia, doll)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The pansy is not higher. The pansy is not forehand. The pansy convulse the deirdre. The eliott marbleise the deirdre. The eliott is forehand. The deirdre marbleise the pansy. The deirdre marbleise the eliott. The deirdre is terrific. The deirdre is higher. The deirdre is stony. The deirdre does not like the pansy. The deirdre hock the eliott. If someone convulse the eliott and they do not see the pansy then the pansy is not forehand. If someone marbleise the eliott and the eliott is terrific then the eliott marbleise the deirdre. If someone marbleise the pansy then they see the deirdre. If someone is higher and they see the deirdre then the deirdre is oafish. If someone marbleise the pansy then they are higher. If someone marbleise the eliott and they are oafish then the eliott does not chase the pansy. The eliott is not higher.", "logic": "\nnot Higher(pansy)\nnot Forehand(pansy)\nConvulse(pansy, deirdre)\nMarbleise(eliott, deirdre)\nForehand(eliott)\nMarbleise(deirdre, pansy)\nMarbleise(deirdre, eliott)\nTerrific(deirdre)\nHigher(deirdre)\nStony(deirdre)\nnot Convulse(deirdre, pansy)\nHock(deirdre, eliott)\nforall x (Convulse(x, eliott) and not Hock(x, pansy) -> not Forehand(pansy))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, eliott) and Terrific(eliott) -> Marbleise(eliott, deirdre))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, pansy) -> Hock(x, deirdre))\nforall x (Higher(x) and Hock(x, deirdre) -> Oafish(deirdre))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, pansy) -> Higher(x))\nforall x (Marbleise(x, eliott) and Oafish(x) -> not Marbleise(eliott, pansy))\n\nnot Higher(eliott)\n\nforall x (Marbleise(x, pansy) -> Higher(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The colly is not forehand. The colly is not ovarian. The colly overfeed the mechelle. The abram fibrillate the mechelle. The abram is ovarian. The mechelle fibrillate the colly. The mechelle fibrillate the abram. The mechelle is soiled. The mechelle is forehand. The mechelle is telescopic. The mechelle does not like the colly. The mechelle chirrup the abram. If someone overfeed the abram and they do not see the colly then the colly is not ovarian. If someone fibrillate the abram and the abram is soiled then the abram fibrillate the mechelle. If someone fibrillate the colly then they see the mechelle. If someone is forehand and they see the mechelle then the mechelle is fulfilled. If someone fibrillate the colly then they are forehand. If someone fibrillate the abram and they are fulfilled then the abram does not chase the colly. The abram chirrup the mechelle.", "logic": "\nnot Forehand(colly)\nnot Ovarian(colly)\nOverfeed(colly, mechelle)\nFibrillate(abram, mechelle)\nOvarian(abram)\nFibrillate(mechelle, colly)\nFibrillate(mechelle, abram)\nSoiled(mechelle)\nForehand(mechelle)\nTelescopic(mechelle)\nnot Overfeed(mechelle, colly)\nChirrup(mechelle, abram)\nforall x (Overfeed(x, abram) and not Chirrup(x, colly) -> not Ovarian(colly))\nforall x (Fibrillate(x, abram) and Soiled(abram) -> Fibrillate(abram, mechelle))\nforall x (Fibrillate(x, colly) -> Chirrup(x, mechelle))\nforall x (Forehand(x) and Chirrup(x, mechelle) -> Fulfilled(mechelle))\nforall x (Fibrillate(x, colly) -> Forehand(x))\nforall x (Fibrillate(x, abram) and Fulfilled(x) -> not Fibrillate(abram, colly))\n\nChirrup(abram, mechelle)\n\nforall x (Fibrillate(x, colly) -> Chirrup(x, mechelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The bellanca is not reserved. The bellanca is not outer. The bellanca answer the zarla. The beck cloud the zarla. The beck is outer. The zarla cloud the bellanca. The zarla cloud the beck. The zarla is multilane. The zarla is reserved. The zarla is zionist. The zarla does not like the bellanca. The zarla susurrate the beck. If someone answer the beck and they do not see the bellanca then the bellanca is not outer. If someone cloud the beck and the beck is multilane then the beck cloud the zarla. If someone cloud the bellanca then they see the zarla. If someone is reserved and they see the zarla then the zarla is quintuple. If someone cloud the bellanca then they are reserved. If someone cloud the beck and they are quintuple then the beck does not chase the bellanca. The bellanca does not see the zarla.", "logic": "\nnot Reserved(bellanca)\nnot Outer(bellanca)\nAnswer(bellanca, zarla)\nCloud(beck, zarla)\nOuter(beck)\nCloud(zarla, bellanca)\nCloud(zarla, beck)\nMultilane(zarla)\nReserved(zarla)\nZionist(zarla)\nnot Answer(zarla, bellanca)\nSusurrate(zarla, beck)\nforall x (Answer(x, beck) and not Susurrate(x, bellanca) -> not Outer(bellanca))\nforall x (Cloud(x, beck) and Multilane(beck) -> Cloud(beck, zarla))\nforall x (Cloud(x, bellanca) -> Susurrate(x, zarla))\nforall x (Reserved(x) and Susurrate(x, zarla) -> Quintuple(zarla))\nforall x (Cloud(x, bellanca) -> Reserved(x))\nforall x (Cloud(x, beck) and Quintuple(x) -> not Cloud(beck, bellanca))\n\nnot Susurrate(bellanca, zarla)\n\nforall x (Cloud(x, bellanca) -> Susurrate(x, zarla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The faun is not neat. The faun is not powered. The faun streetwalk the lizzie. The madelina jaundice the lizzie. The madelina is powered. The lizzie jaundice the faun. The lizzie jaundice the madelina. The lizzie is gustatory. The lizzie is neat. The lizzie is sapphic. The lizzie does not like the faun. The lizzie constrict the madelina. If someone streetwalk the madelina and they do not see the faun then the faun is not powered. If someone jaundice the madelina and the madelina is gustatory then the madelina jaundice the lizzie. If someone jaundice the faun then they see the lizzie. If someone is neat and they see the lizzie then the lizzie is envious. If someone jaundice the faun then they are neat. If someone jaundice the madelina and they are envious then the madelina does not chase the faun. The madelina streetwalk the lizzie.", "logic": "\nnot Neat(faun)\nnot Powered(faun)\nStreetwalk(faun, lizzie)\nJaundice(madelina, lizzie)\nPowered(madelina)\nJaundice(lizzie, faun)\nJaundice(lizzie, madelina)\nGustatory(lizzie)\nNeat(lizzie)\nSapphic(lizzie)\nnot Streetwalk(lizzie, faun)\nConstrict(lizzie, madelina)\nforall x (Streetwalk(x, madelina) and not Constrict(x, faun) -> not Powered(faun))\nforall x (Jaundice(x, madelina) and Gustatory(madelina) -> Jaundice(madelina, lizzie))\nforall x (Jaundice(x, faun) -> Constrict(x, lizzie))\nforall x (Neat(x) and Constrict(x, lizzie) -> Envious(lizzie))\nforall x (Jaundice(x, faun) -> Neat(x))\nforall x (Jaundice(x, madelina) and Envious(x) -> not Jaundice(madelina, faun))\n\nStreetwalk(madelina, lizzie)\n\nStreetwalk(madelina, lizzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The sergent is not loco. The sergent is not hilarious. The sergent ticktack the danit. The christina allude the danit. The christina is hilarious. The danit allude the sergent. The danit allude the christina. The danit is ajar. The danit is loco. The danit is birchen. The danit does not like the sergent. The danit elide the christina. If someone ticktack the christina and they do not see the sergent then the sergent is not hilarious. If someone allude the christina and the christina is ajar then the christina allude the danit. If someone allude the sergent then they see the danit. If someone is loco and they see the danit then the danit is jawed. If someone allude the sergent then they are loco. If someone allude the christina and they are jawed then the christina does not chase the sergent. The danit does not chase the danit.", "logic": "\nnot Loco(sergent)\nnot Hilarious(sergent)\nTicktack(sergent, danit)\nAllude(christina, danit)\nHilarious(christina)\nAllude(danit, sergent)\nAllude(danit, christina)\nAjar(danit)\nLoco(danit)\nBirchen(danit)\nnot Ticktack(danit, sergent)\nElide(danit, christina)\nforall x (Ticktack(x, christina) and not Elide(x, sergent) -> not Hilarious(sergent))\nforall x (Allude(x, christina) and Ajar(christina) -> Allude(christina, danit))\nforall x (Allude(x, sergent) -> Elide(x, danit))\nforall x (Loco(x) and Elide(x, danit) -> Jawed(danit))\nforall x (Allude(x, sergent) -> Loco(x))\nforall x (Allude(x, christina) and Jawed(x) -> not Allude(christina, sergent))\n\nnot Allude(danit, danit)\n\nnot Allude(danit, danit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The alexa is not ellipsoid. The alexa is not winless. The alexa unburden the robin. The luigi jettison the robin. The luigi is winless. The robin jettison the alexa. The robin jettison the luigi. The robin is tall. The robin is ellipsoid. The robin is corvine. The robin does not like the alexa. The robin outlaw the luigi. If someone unburden the luigi and they do not see the alexa then the alexa is not winless. If someone jettison the luigi and the luigi is tall then the luigi jettison the robin. If someone jettison the alexa then they see the robin. If someone is ellipsoid and they see the robin then the robin is tied. If someone jettison the alexa then they are ellipsoid. If someone jettison the luigi and they are tied then the luigi does not chase the alexa. The robin unburden the luigi.", "logic": "\nnot Ellipsoid(alexa)\nnot Winless(alexa)\nUnburden(alexa, robin)\nJettison(luigi, robin)\nWinless(luigi)\nJettison(robin, alexa)\nJettison(robin, luigi)\nTall(robin)\nEllipsoid(robin)\nCorvine(robin)\nnot Unburden(robin, alexa)\nOutlaw(robin, luigi)\nforall x (Unburden(x, luigi) and not Outlaw(x, alexa) -> not Winless(alexa))\nforall x (Jettison(x, luigi) and Tall(luigi) -> Jettison(luigi, robin))\nforall x (Jettison(x, alexa) -> Outlaw(x, robin))\nforall x (Ellipsoid(x) and Outlaw(x, robin) -> Tied(robin))\nforall x (Jettison(x, alexa) -> Ellipsoid(x))\nforall x (Jettison(x, luigi) and Tied(x) -> not Jettison(luigi, alexa))\n\nUnburden(robin, luigi)\n\nUnburden(robin, luigi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The midge is not active. The midge is not gallican. The midge pelt the lanni. The binky emphasize the lanni. The binky is gallican. The lanni emphasize the midge. The lanni emphasize the binky. The lanni is ceaseless. The lanni is active. The lanni is meet. The lanni does not like the midge. The lanni intrench the binky. If someone pelt the binky and they do not see the midge then the midge is not gallican. If someone emphasize the binky and the binky is ceaseless then the binky emphasize the lanni. If someone emphasize the midge then they see the lanni. If someone is active and they see the lanni then the lanni is jittery. If someone emphasize the midge then they are active. If someone emphasize the binky and they are jittery then the binky does not chase the midge. The binky does not like the binky.", "logic": "\nnot Active(midge)\nnot Gallican(midge)\nPelt(midge, lanni)\nEmphasize(binky, lanni)\nGallican(binky)\nEmphasize(lanni, midge)\nEmphasize(lanni, binky)\nCeaseless(lanni)\nActive(lanni)\nMeet(lanni)\nnot Pelt(lanni, midge)\nIntrench(lanni, binky)\nforall x (Pelt(x, binky) and not Intrench(x, midge) -> not Gallican(midge))\nforall x (Emphasize(x, binky) and Ceaseless(binky) -> Emphasize(binky, lanni))\nforall x (Emphasize(x, midge) -> Intrench(x, lanni))\nforall x (Active(x) and Intrench(x, lanni) -> Jittery(lanni))\nforall x (Emphasize(x, midge) -> Active(x))\nforall x (Emphasize(x, binky) and Jittery(x) -> not Emphasize(binky, midge))\n\nnot Pelt(binky, binky)\n\nnot Pelt(binky, binky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The jud is not rank. The jud is not dumfounded. The jud faze the ibbie. The rodolfo incise the ibbie. The rodolfo is dumfounded. The ibbie incise the jud. The ibbie incise the rodolfo. The ibbie is unreal. The ibbie is rank. The ibbie is moravian. The ibbie does not like the jud. The ibbie compact the rodolfo. If someone faze the rodolfo and they do not see the jud then the jud is not dumfounded. If someone incise the rodolfo and the rodolfo is unreal then the rodolfo incise the ibbie. If someone incise the jud then they see the ibbie. If someone is rank and they see the ibbie then the ibbie is fanlike. If someone incise the jud then they are rank. If someone incise the rodolfo and they are fanlike then the rodolfo does not chase the jud. The jud faze the jud.", "logic": "\nnot Rank(jud)\nnot Dumfounded(jud)\nFaze(jud, ibbie)\nIncise(rodolfo, ibbie)\nDumfounded(rodolfo)\nIncise(ibbie, jud)\nIncise(ibbie, rodolfo)\nUnreal(ibbie)\nRank(ibbie)\nMoravian(ibbie)\nnot Faze(ibbie, jud)\nCompact(ibbie, rodolfo)\nforall x (Faze(x, rodolfo) and not Compact(x, jud) -> not Dumfounded(jud))\nforall x (Incise(x, rodolfo) and Unreal(rodolfo) -> Incise(rodolfo, ibbie))\nforall x (Incise(x, jud) -> Compact(x, ibbie))\nforall x (Rank(x) and Compact(x, ibbie) -> Fanlike(ibbie))\nforall x (Incise(x, jud) -> Rank(x))\nforall x (Incise(x, rodolfo) and Fanlike(x) -> not Incise(rodolfo, jud))\n\nFaze(jud, jud)\n\nFaze(jud, jud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1364"} {"premises": "The vasili signalize the oralia. The vasili outgeneral the oralia. The vasili is seeing. The vasili is nativistic. The vasili is obtrusive. The vasili ballyhoo the oralia. The oralia signalize the vasili. The oralia outgeneral the vasili. The oralia is metrical. The oralia ballyhoo the vasili. If something signalize the vasili and the vasili ballyhoo the oralia then the oralia is disparate. If something signalize the oralia and the oralia outgeneral the vasili then it outgeneral the oralia. If something is disparate then it signalize the oralia. The vasili is obtrusive.", "logic": "\nSignalize(vasili, oralia)\nOutgeneral(vasili, oralia)\nSeeing(vasili)\nNativistic(vasili)\nObtrusive(vasili)\nBallyhoo(vasili, oralia)\nSignalize(oralia, vasili)\nOutgeneral(oralia, vasili)\nMetrical(oralia)\nBallyhoo(oralia, vasili)\nforall x (Signalize(x, vasili) and Ballyhoo(vasili, oralia) -> Disparate(oralia))\nforall x (Signalize(x, oralia) and Outgeneral(oralia, vasili) -> Outgeneral(x, oralia))\nforall x (Disparate(x) -> Signalize(x, oralia))\n\nObtrusive(vasili)\n\ntherefore Obtrusive(vasili)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The calhoun acquit the emerson. The calhoun rock the emerson. The calhoun is redoubled. The calhoun is blended. The calhoun is varnished. The calhoun send the emerson. The emerson acquit the calhoun. The emerson rock the calhoun. The emerson is frolicsome. The emerson send the calhoun. If something acquit the calhoun and the calhoun send the emerson then the emerson is hindu. If something acquit the emerson and the emerson rock the calhoun then it rock the emerson. If something is hindu then it acquit the emerson. The calhoun does not visit the emerson.", "logic": "\nAcquit(calhoun, emerson)\nRock(calhoun, emerson)\nRedoubled(calhoun)\nBlended(calhoun)\nVarnished(calhoun)\nSend(calhoun, emerson)\nAcquit(emerson, calhoun)\nRock(emerson, calhoun)\nFrolicsome(emerson)\nSend(emerson, calhoun)\nforall x (Acquit(x, calhoun) and Send(calhoun, emerson) -> Hindu(emerson))\nforall x (Acquit(x, emerson) and Rock(emerson, calhoun) -> Rock(x, emerson))\nforall x (Hindu(x) -> Acquit(x, emerson))\n\nnot Send(calhoun, emerson)\n\ntherefore Send(calhoun, emerson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The xena submerse the fabio. The xena caseate the fabio. The xena is unuseable. The xena is unhuman. The xena is bimodal. The xena chouse the fabio. The fabio submerse the xena. The fabio caseate the xena. The fabio is areal. The fabio chouse the xena. If something submerse the xena and the xena chouse the fabio then the fabio is amort. If something submerse the fabio and the fabio caseate the xena then it caseate the fabio. If something is amort then it submerse the fabio. The fabio is amort.", "logic": "\nSubmerse(xena, fabio)\nCaseate(xena, fabio)\nUnuseable(xena)\nUnhuman(xena)\nBimodal(xena)\nChouse(xena, fabio)\nSubmerse(fabio, xena)\nCaseate(fabio, xena)\nAreal(fabio)\nChouse(fabio, xena)\nforall x (Submerse(x, xena) and Chouse(xena, fabio) -> Amort(fabio))\nforall x (Submerse(x, fabio) and Caseate(fabio, xena) -> Caseate(x, fabio))\nforall x (Amort(x) -> Submerse(x, fabio))\n\nAmort(fabio)\n\nSubmerse(fabio, xena) and Chouse(xena, fabio) and forall x (Submerse(x, xena) and Chouse(xena, fabio) -> Amort(fabio)) -> therefore Amort(fabio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The meir float the higgins. The meir slosh the higgins. The meir is spouting. The meir is perceptive. The meir is exigent. The meir oust the higgins. The higgins float the meir. The higgins slosh the meir. The higgins is flecked. The higgins oust the meir. If something float the meir and the meir oust the higgins then the higgins is reverent. If something float the higgins and the higgins slosh the meir then it slosh the higgins. If something is reverent then it float the higgins. The higgins is not reverent.", "logic": "\nFloat(meir, higgins)\nSlosh(meir, higgins)\nSpouting(meir)\nPerceptive(meir)\nExigent(meir)\nOust(meir, higgins)\nFloat(higgins, meir)\nSlosh(higgins, meir)\nFlecked(higgins)\nOust(higgins, meir)\nforall x (Float(x, meir) and Oust(meir, higgins) -> Reverent(higgins))\nforall x (Float(x, higgins) and Slosh(higgins, meir) -> Slosh(x, higgins))\nforall x (Reverent(x) -> Float(x, higgins))\n\nnot Reverent(higgins)\n\nFloat(higgins, meir) and Oust(meir, higgins) and forall x (Float(x, meir) and Oust(meir, higgins) -> Reverent(higgins)) -> therefore Reverent(higgins)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The bobette astound the magda. The bobette image the magda. The bobette is inexpert. The bobette is dreamlike. The bobette is teenaged. The bobette advertize the magda. The magda astound the bobette. The magda image the bobette. The magda is rickety. The magda advertize the bobette. If something astound the bobette and the bobette advertize the magda then the magda is measurable. If something astound the magda and the magda image the bobette then it image the magda. If something is measurable then it astound the magda. The magda astound the magda.", "logic": "\nAstound(bobette, magda)\nImage(bobette, magda)\nInexpert(bobette)\nDreamlike(bobette)\nTeenaged(bobette)\nAdvertize(bobette, magda)\nAstound(magda, bobette)\nImage(magda, bobette)\nRickety(magda)\nAdvertize(magda, bobette)\nforall x (Astound(x, bobette) and Advertize(bobette, magda) -> Measurable(magda))\nforall x (Astound(x, magda) and Image(magda, bobette) -> Image(x, magda))\nforall x (Measurable(x) -> Astound(x, magda))\n\nAstound(magda, magda)\n\nAstound(magda, bobette) and Advertize(bobette, magda) and forall x (Astound(x, bobette) and Advertize(bobette, magda) -> Measurable(magda)) -> therefore Measurable(magda) Measurable(magda) and forall x (Measurable(x) -> Astound(x, magda)) -> therefore Astound(magda, magda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The pyotr reprieve the wylma. The pyotr bate the wylma. The pyotr is moresque. The pyotr is ulcerative. The pyotr is catalectic. The pyotr bail the wylma. The wylma reprieve the pyotr. The wylma bate the pyotr. The wylma is diamantine. The wylma bail the pyotr. If something reprieve the pyotr and the pyotr bail the wylma then the wylma is ventricous. If something reprieve the wylma and the wylma bate the pyotr then it bate the wylma. If something is ventricous then it reprieve the wylma. The wylma does not chase the wylma.", "logic": "\nReprieve(pyotr, wylma)\nBate(pyotr, wylma)\nMoresque(pyotr)\nUlcerative(pyotr)\nCatalectic(pyotr)\nBail(pyotr, wylma)\nReprieve(wylma, pyotr)\nBate(wylma, pyotr)\nDiamantine(wylma)\nBail(wylma, pyotr)\nforall x (Reprieve(x, pyotr) and Bail(pyotr, wylma) -> Ventricous(wylma))\nforall x (Reprieve(x, wylma) and Bate(wylma, pyotr) -> Bate(x, wylma))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) -> Reprieve(x, wylma))\n\nnot Reprieve(wylma, wylma)\n\nReprieve(wylma, pyotr) and Bail(pyotr, wylma) and forall x (Reprieve(x, pyotr) and Bail(pyotr, wylma) -> Ventricous(wylma)) -> therefore Ventricous(wylma) Ventricous(wylma) and forall x (Ventricous(x) -> Reprieve(x, wylma)) -> therefore Reprieve(wylma, wylma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The graeme saunter the marni. The graeme gamble the marni. The graeme is homologic. The graeme is blear. The graeme is apian. The graeme devilise the marni. The marni saunter the graeme. The marni gamble the graeme. The marni is puppylike. The marni devilise the graeme. If something saunter the graeme and the graeme devilise the marni then the marni is scrofulous. If something saunter the marni and the marni gamble the graeme then it gamble the marni. If something is scrofulous then it saunter the marni. The marni gamble the marni.", "logic": "\nSaunter(graeme, marni)\nGamble(graeme, marni)\nHomologic(graeme)\nBlear(graeme)\nApian(graeme)\nDevilise(graeme, marni)\nSaunter(marni, graeme)\nGamble(marni, graeme)\nPuppylike(marni)\nDevilise(marni, graeme)\nforall x (Saunter(x, graeme) and Devilise(graeme, marni) -> Scrofulous(marni))\nforall x (Saunter(x, marni) and Gamble(marni, graeme) -> Gamble(x, marni))\nforall x (Scrofulous(x) -> Saunter(x, marni))\n\nGamble(marni, marni)\n\nSaunter(marni, graeme) and Devilise(graeme, marni) and forall x (Saunter(x, graeme) and Devilise(graeme, marni) -> Scrofulous(marni)) -> therefore Scrofulous(marni) Scrofulous(marni) and forall x (Scrofulous(x) -> Saunter(x, marni)) -> therefore Saunter(marni, marni) Saunter(marni, marni) and Gamble(marni, graeme) and forall x (Saunter(x, marni) and Gamble(marni, graeme) -> Gamble(x, marni)) -> therefore Gamble(marni, marni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The michel recombine the sting. The michel entrance the sting. The michel is comfy. The michel is congested. The michel is inaudible. The michel dissent the sting. The sting recombine the michel. The sting entrance the michel. The sting is mislabeled. The sting dissent the michel. If something recombine the michel and the michel dissent the sting then the sting is overmodest. If something recombine the sting and the sting entrance the michel then it entrance the sting. If something is overmodest then it recombine the sting. The sting does not eat the sting.", "logic": "\nRecombine(michel, sting)\nEntrance(michel, sting)\nComfy(michel)\nCongested(michel)\nInaudible(michel)\nDissent(michel, sting)\nRecombine(sting, michel)\nEntrance(sting, michel)\nMislabeled(sting)\nDissent(sting, michel)\nforall x (Recombine(x, michel) and Dissent(michel, sting) -> Overmodest(sting))\nforall x (Recombine(x, sting) and Entrance(sting, michel) -> Entrance(x, sting))\nforall x (Overmodest(x) -> Recombine(x, sting))\n\nnot Entrance(sting, sting)\n\nRecombine(sting, michel) and Dissent(michel, sting) and forall x (Recombine(x, michel) and Dissent(michel, sting) -> Overmodest(sting)) -> therefore Overmodest(sting) Overmodest(sting) and forall x (Overmodest(x) -> Recombine(x, sting)) -> therefore Recombine(sting, sting) Recombine(sting, sting) and Entrance(sting, michel) and forall x (Recombine(x, sting) and Entrance(sting, michel) -> Entrance(x, sting)) -> therefore Entrance(sting, sting)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The iolande mute the lee. The iolande utter the lee. The iolande is carefree. The iolande is stilly. The iolande is auditive. The iolande whelp the lee. The lee mute the iolande. The lee utter the iolande. The lee is revelatory. The lee whelp the iolande. If something mute the iolande and the iolande whelp the lee then the lee is nodulated. If something mute the lee and the lee utter the iolande then it utter the lee. If something is nodulated then it mute the lee. The iolande does not chase the iolande.", "logic": "\nMute(iolande, lee)\nUtter(iolande, lee)\nCarefree(iolande)\nStilly(iolande)\nAuditive(iolande)\nWhelp(iolande, lee)\nMute(lee, iolande)\nUtter(lee, iolande)\nRevelatory(lee)\nWhelp(lee, iolande)\nforall x (Mute(x, iolande) and Whelp(iolande, lee) -> Nodulated(lee))\nforall x (Mute(x, lee) and Utter(lee, iolande) -> Utter(x, lee))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Mute(x, lee))\n\nnot Mute(iolande, iolande)\n\nnot Mute(iolande, iolande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The mitch retread the forrester. The mitch plow the forrester. The mitch is unvarying. The mitch is bicoloured. The mitch is anodyne. The mitch jettison the forrester. The forrester retread the mitch. The forrester plow the mitch. The forrester is ictic. The forrester jettison the mitch. If something retread the mitch and the mitch jettison the forrester then the forrester is staid. If something retread the forrester and the forrester plow the mitch then it plow the forrester. If something is staid then it retread the forrester. The forrester is anodyne.", "logic": "\nRetread(mitch, forrester)\nPlow(mitch, forrester)\nUnvarying(mitch)\nBicoloured(mitch)\nAnodyne(mitch)\nJettison(mitch, forrester)\nRetread(forrester, mitch)\nPlow(forrester, mitch)\nIctic(forrester)\nJettison(forrester, mitch)\nforall x (Retread(x, mitch) and Jettison(mitch, forrester) -> Staid(forrester))\nforall x (Retread(x, forrester) and Plow(forrester, mitch) -> Plow(x, forrester))\nforall x (Staid(x) -> Retread(x, forrester))\n\nAnodyne(forrester)\n\nAnodyne(forrester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The marchelle lynch the luke. The marchelle casket the luke. The marchelle is glooming. The marchelle is indigenous. The marchelle is sibyllic. The marchelle limit the luke. The luke lynch the marchelle. The luke casket the marchelle. The luke is faddish. The luke limit the marchelle. If something lynch the marchelle and the marchelle limit the luke then the luke is blatant. If something lynch the luke and the luke casket the marchelle then it casket the luke. If something is blatant then it lynch the luke. The marchelle is not faddish.", "logic": "\nLynch(marchelle, luke)\nCasket(marchelle, luke)\nGlooming(marchelle)\nIndigenous(marchelle)\nSibyllic(marchelle)\nLimit(marchelle, luke)\nLynch(luke, marchelle)\nCasket(luke, marchelle)\nFaddish(luke)\nLimit(luke, marchelle)\nforall x (Lynch(x, marchelle) and Limit(marchelle, luke) -> Blatant(luke))\nforall x (Lynch(x, luke) and Casket(luke, marchelle) -> Casket(x, luke))\nforall x (Blatant(x) -> Lynch(x, luke))\n\nnot Faddish(marchelle)\n\nnot Faddish(marchelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The lonna bacterise the brook. The lonna woolgather the brook. The lonna is tomentose. The lonna is modern. The lonna is wary. The lonna dishonor the brook. The brook bacterise the lonna. The brook woolgather the lonna. The brook is bungaloid. The brook dishonor the lonna. If something bacterise the lonna and the lonna dishonor the brook then the brook is homophile. If something bacterise the brook and the brook woolgather the lonna then it woolgather the brook. If something is homophile then it bacterise the brook. The brook is tomentose.", "logic": "\nBacterise(lonna, brook)\nWoolgather(lonna, brook)\nTomentose(lonna)\nModern(lonna)\nWary(lonna)\nDishonor(lonna, brook)\nBacterise(brook, lonna)\nWoolgather(brook, lonna)\nBungaloid(brook)\nDishonor(brook, lonna)\nforall x (Bacterise(x, lonna) and Dishonor(lonna, brook) -> Homophile(brook))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, brook) and Woolgather(brook, lonna) -> Woolgather(x, brook))\nforall x (Homophile(x) -> Bacterise(x, brook))\n\nTomentose(brook)\n\nTomentose(brook) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The meg specialise the mabelle. The meg deoxidize the mabelle. The meg is designing. The meg is dread. The meg is overstrung. The meg cushion the mabelle. The mabelle specialise the meg. The mabelle deoxidize the meg. The mabelle is storeyed. The mabelle cushion the meg. If something specialise the meg and the meg cushion the mabelle then the mabelle is sulfurous. If something specialise the mabelle and the mabelle deoxidize the meg then it deoxidize the mabelle. If something is sulfurous then it specialise the mabelle. The meg does not visit the meg.", "logic": "\nSpecialise(meg, mabelle)\nDeoxidize(meg, mabelle)\nDesigning(meg)\nDread(meg)\nOverstrung(meg)\nCushion(meg, mabelle)\nSpecialise(mabelle, meg)\nDeoxidize(mabelle, meg)\nStoreyed(mabelle)\nCushion(mabelle, meg)\nforall x (Specialise(x, meg) and Cushion(meg, mabelle) -> Sulfurous(mabelle))\nforall x (Specialise(x, mabelle) and Deoxidize(mabelle, meg) -> Deoxidize(x, mabelle))\nforall x (Sulfurous(x) -> Specialise(x, mabelle))\n\nnot Cushion(meg, meg)\n\nnot Cushion(meg, meg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The blythe jingle the kelwin. The blythe bisect the kelwin. The blythe is algoid. The blythe is xxxi. The blythe is bosomy. The blythe dogmatise the kelwin. The kelwin jingle the blythe. The kelwin bisect the blythe. The kelwin is aphotic. The kelwin dogmatise the blythe. If something jingle the blythe and the blythe dogmatise the kelwin then the kelwin is obvious. If something jingle the kelwin and the kelwin bisect the blythe then it bisect the kelwin. If something is obvious then it jingle the kelwin. The kelwin is xxxi.", "logic": "\nJingle(blythe, kelwin)\nBisect(blythe, kelwin)\nAlgoid(blythe)\nXxxi(blythe)\nBosomy(blythe)\nDogmatise(blythe, kelwin)\nJingle(kelwin, blythe)\nBisect(kelwin, blythe)\nAphotic(kelwin)\nDogmatise(kelwin, blythe)\nforall x (Jingle(x, blythe) and Dogmatise(blythe, kelwin) -> Obvious(kelwin))\nforall x (Jingle(x, kelwin) and Bisect(kelwin, blythe) -> Bisect(x, kelwin))\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> Jingle(x, kelwin))\n\nXxxi(kelwin)\n\nXxxi(kelwin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The elyssa enclothe the nady. The elyssa roughen the nady. The elyssa is hadean. The elyssa is umbellar. The elyssa is engaging. The elyssa cheerlead the nady. The nady enclothe the elyssa. The nady roughen the elyssa. The nady is milanese. The nady cheerlead the elyssa. If something enclothe the elyssa and the elyssa cheerlead the nady then the nady is ichorous. If something enclothe the nady and the nady roughen the elyssa then it roughen the nady. If something is ichorous then it enclothe the nady. The nady does not visit the nady.", "logic": "\nEnclothe(elyssa, nady)\nRoughen(elyssa, nady)\nHadean(elyssa)\nUmbellar(elyssa)\nEngaging(elyssa)\nCheerlead(elyssa, nady)\nEnclothe(nady, elyssa)\nRoughen(nady, elyssa)\nMilanese(nady)\nCheerlead(nady, elyssa)\nforall x (Enclothe(x, elyssa) and Cheerlead(elyssa, nady) -> Ichorous(nady))\nforall x (Enclothe(x, nady) and Roughen(nady, elyssa) -> Roughen(x, nady))\nforall x (Ichorous(x) -> Enclothe(x, nady))\n\nnot Cheerlead(nady, nady)\n\nnot Cheerlead(nady, nady) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "The cassy sublet the melicent. The cassy crosscut the melicent. The cassy is nonlethal. The cassy is somber. The cassy is creedal. The cassy redecorate the melicent. The melicent sublet the cassy. The melicent crosscut the cassy. The melicent is mucosal. The melicent redecorate the cassy. If something sublet the cassy and the cassy redecorate the melicent then the melicent is secondhand. If something sublet the melicent and the melicent crosscut the cassy then it crosscut the melicent. If something is secondhand then it sublet the melicent. The cassy crosscut the cassy.", "logic": "\nSublet(cassy, melicent)\nCrosscut(cassy, melicent)\nNonlethal(cassy)\nSomber(cassy)\nCreedal(cassy)\nRedecorate(cassy, melicent)\nSublet(melicent, cassy)\nCrosscut(melicent, cassy)\nMucosal(melicent)\nRedecorate(melicent, cassy)\nforall x (Sublet(x, cassy) and Redecorate(cassy, melicent) -> Secondhand(melicent))\nforall x (Sublet(x, melicent) and Crosscut(melicent, cassy) -> Crosscut(x, melicent))\nforall x (Secondhand(x) -> Sublet(x, melicent))\n\nCrosscut(cassy, cassy)\n\nCrosscut(cassy, cassy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-845"} {"premises": "Pansy is inst. Pansy is unforeseen. Pansy is taunting. Pansy is submissive. Pansy is eighth. Kenn is inst. Kenn is unforeseen. Kenn is taunting. Kenn is polygenic. Kenn is submissive. Kenn is imputable. Kenn is eighth. Morty is unforeseen. Morty is taunting. Morty is polygenic. All submissive, polygenic things are inst. All imputable, polygenic things are taunting. Round things are polygenic. If something is submissive and polygenic then it is eighth. Young, submissive things are unforeseen. All imputable things are polygenic. Young, unforeseen things are submissive. If Morty is unforeseen and Morty is taunting then Morty is eighth. Pansy is inst.", "logic": "\nInst(pansy)\nUnforeseen(pansy)\nTaunting(pansy)\nSubmissive(pansy)\nEighth(pansy)\nInst(kenn)\nUnforeseen(kenn)\nTaunting(kenn)\nPolygenic(kenn)\nSubmissive(kenn)\nImputable(kenn)\nEighth(kenn)\nUnforeseen(morty)\nTaunting(morty)\nPolygenic(morty)\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Polygenic(x) -> Inst(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) and Polygenic(x) -> Taunting(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> Polygenic(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) and Polygenic(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Submissive(x) -> Unforeseen(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> Polygenic(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Unforeseen(x) -> Submissive(x))\nUnforeseen(morty) and Taunting(morty) -> Eighth(morty)\n\nInst(pansy)\n\ntherefore Inst(pansy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Antoine is scrotal. Antoine is fortissimo. Antoine is sadistic. Antoine is seasoned. Antoine is clumsy. Lemmie is scrotal. Lemmie is fortissimo. Lemmie is sadistic. Lemmie is preanal. Lemmie is seasoned. Lemmie is childish. Lemmie is clumsy. Alvinia is fortissimo. Alvinia is sadistic. Alvinia is preanal. All seasoned, preanal things are scrotal. All childish, preanal things are sadistic. Round things are preanal. If something is seasoned and preanal then it is clumsy. Young, seasoned things are fortissimo. All childish things are preanal. Young, fortissimo things are seasoned. If Alvinia is fortissimo and Alvinia is sadistic then Alvinia is clumsy. Lemmie is not seasoned.", "logic": "\nScrotal(antoine)\nFortissimo(antoine)\nSadistic(antoine)\nSeasoned(antoine)\nClumsy(antoine)\nScrotal(lemmie)\nFortissimo(lemmie)\nSadistic(lemmie)\nPreanal(lemmie)\nSeasoned(lemmie)\nChildish(lemmie)\nClumsy(lemmie)\nFortissimo(alvinia)\nSadistic(alvinia)\nPreanal(alvinia)\nforall x (Seasoned(x) and Preanal(x) -> Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) and Preanal(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) and Preanal(x) -> Clumsy(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) and Seasoned(x) -> Fortissimo(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Clumsy(x) and Fortissimo(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nFortissimo(alvinia) and Sadistic(alvinia) -> Clumsy(alvinia)\n\nnot Seasoned(lemmie)\n\ntherefore Seasoned(lemmie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Doll is littered. Doll is tubelike. Doll is arthritic. Doll is adherent. Doll is fraternal. Mildred is littered. Mildred is tubelike. Mildred is arthritic. Mildred is unharmed. Mildred is adherent. Mildred is slavelike. Mildred is fraternal. Brigitta is tubelike. Brigitta is arthritic. Brigitta is unharmed. All adherent, unharmed things are littered. All slavelike, unharmed things are arthritic. Round things are unharmed. If something is adherent and unharmed then it is fraternal. Young, adherent things are tubelike. All slavelike things are unharmed. Young, tubelike things are adherent. If Brigitta is tubelike and Brigitta is arthritic then Brigitta is fraternal. Brigitta is fraternal.", "logic": "\nLittered(doll)\nTubelike(doll)\nArthritic(doll)\nAdherent(doll)\nFraternal(doll)\nLittered(mildred)\nTubelike(mildred)\nArthritic(mildred)\nUnharmed(mildred)\nAdherent(mildred)\nSlavelike(mildred)\nFraternal(mildred)\nTubelike(brigitta)\nArthritic(brigitta)\nUnharmed(brigitta)\nforall x (Adherent(x) and Unharmed(x) -> Littered(x))\nforall x (Slavelike(x) and Unharmed(x) -> Arthritic(x))\nforall x (Slavelike(x) -> Unharmed(x))\nforall x (Adherent(x) and Unharmed(x) -> Fraternal(x))\nforall x (Fraternal(x) and Adherent(x) -> Tubelike(x))\nforall x (Slavelike(x) -> Unharmed(x))\nforall x (Fraternal(x) and Tubelike(x) -> Adherent(x))\nTubelike(brigitta) and Arthritic(brigitta) -> Fraternal(brigitta)\n\nFraternal(brigitta)\n\nTubelike(brigitta) and Arthritic(brigitta) and Tubelike(brigitta) and Arthritic(brigitta) -> Fraternal(brigitta) -> therefore Fraternal(brigitta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Nertie is sundry. Nertie is autistic. Nertie is unlisted. Nertie is hominid. Nertie is heathenish. Aleck is sundry. Aleck is autistic. Aleck is unlisted. Aleck is catkinate. Aleck is hominid. Aleck is winy. Aleck is heathenish. Paolo is autistic. Paolo is unlisted. Paolo is catkinate. All hominid, catkinate things are sundry. All winy, catkinate things are unlisted. Round things are catkinate. If something is hominid and catkinate then it is heathenish. Young, hominid things are autistic. All winy things are catkinate. Young, autistic things are hominid. If Paolo is autistic and Paolo is unlisted then Paolo is heathenish. Paolo is not heathenish.", "logic": "\nSundry(nertie)\nAutistic(nertie)\nUnlisted(nertie)\nHominid(nertie)\nHeathenish(nertie)\nSundry(aleck)\nAutistic(aleck)\nUnlisted(aleck)\nCatkinate(aleck)\nHominid(aleck)\nWiny(aleck)\nHeathenish(aleck)\nAutistic(paolo)\nUnlisted(paolo)\nCatkinate(paolo)\nforall x (Hominid(x) and Catkinate(x) -> Sundry(x))\nforall x (Winy(x) and Catkinate(x) -> Unlisted(x))\nforall x (Winy(x) -> Catkinate(x))\nforall x (Hominid(x) and Catkinate(x) -> Heathenish(x))\nforall x (Heathenish(x) and Hominid(x) -> Autistic(x))\nforall x (Winy(x) -> Catkinate(x))\nforall x (Heathenish(x) and Autistic(x) -> Hominid(x))\nAutistic(paolo) and Unlisted(paolo) -> Heathenish(paolo)\n\nnot Heathenish(paolo)\n\nAutistic(paolo) and Unlisted(paolo) and Autistic(paolo) and Unlisted(paolo) -> Heathenish(paolo) -> therefore Heathenish(paolo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Charmian is eroded. Charmian is unpowered. Charmian is aspiring. Charmian is queasy. Charmian is uncombined. Ayn is eroded. Ayn is unpowered. Ayn is aspiring. Ayn is queenly. Ayn is queasy. Ayn is nostalgic. Ayn is uncombined. Welbie is unpowered. Welbie is aspiring. Welbie is queenly. All queasy, queenly things are eroded. All nostalgic, queenly things are aspiring. Round things are queenly. If something is queasy and queenly then it is uncombined. Young, queasy things are unpowered. All nostalgic things are queenly. Young, unpowered things are queasy. If Welbie is unpowered and Welbie is aspiring then Welbie is uncombined. Welbie is queasy.", "logic": "\nEroded(charmian)\nUnpowered(charmian)\nAspiring(charmian)\nQueasy(charmian)\nUncombined(charmian)\nEroded(ayn)\nUnpowered(ayn)\nAspiring(ayn)\nQueenly(ayn)\nQueasy(ayn)\nNostalgic(ayn)\nUncombined(ayn)\nUnpowered(welbie)\nAspiring(welbie)\nQueenly(welbie)\nforall x (Queasy(x) and Queenly(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Nostalgic(x) and Queenly(x) -> Aspiring(x))\nforall x (Nostalgic(x) -> Queenly(x))\nforall x (Queasy(x) and Queenly(x) -> Uncombined(x))\nforall x (Uncombined(x) and Queasy(x) -> Unpowered(x))\nforall x (Nostalgic(x) -> Queenly(x))\nforall x (Uncombined(x) and Unpowered(x) -> Queasy(x))\nUnpowered(welbie) and Aspiring(welbie) -> Uncombined(welbie)\n\nQueasy(welbie)\n\nUnpowered(welbie) and Aspiring(welbie) and Unpowered(welbie) and Aspiring(welbie) -> Uncombined(welbie) -> therefore Uncombined(welbie) Uncombined(welbie) and Unpowered(welbie) and forall x (Uncombined(x) and Unpowered(x) -> Queasy(x)) -> therefore Queasy(welbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Brynne is stimulant. Brynne is myeloid. Brynne is acetous. Brynne is blowy. Brynne is unsung. Ilyssa is stimulant. Ilyssa is myeloid. Ilyssa is acetous. Ilyssa is mauve. Ilyssa is blowy. Ilyssa is proofed. Ilyssa is unsung. Carry is myeloid. Carry is acetous. Carry is mauve. All blowy, mauve things are stimulant. All proofed, mauve things are acetous. Round things are mauve. If something is blowy and mauve then it is unsung. Young, blowy things are myeloid. All proofed things are mauve. Young, myeloid things are blowy. If Carry is myeloid and Carry is acetous then Carry is unsung. Carry is not blowy.", "logic": "\nStimulant(brynne)\nMyeloid(brynne)\nAcetous(brynne)\nBlowy(brynne)\nUnsung(brynne)\nStimulant(ilyssa)\nMyeloid(ilyssa)\nAcetous(ilyssa)\nMauve(ilyssa)\nBlowy(ilyssa)\nProofed(ilyssa)\nUnsung(ilyssa)\nMyeloid(carry)\nAcetous(carry)\nMauve(carry)\nforall x (Blowy(x) and Mauve(x) -> Stimulant(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) and Mauve(x) -> Acetous(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Blowy(x) and Mauve(x) -> Unsung(x))\nforall x (Unsung(x) and Blowy(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Unsung(x) and Myeloid(x) -> Blowy(x))\nMyeloid(carry) and Acetous(carry) -> Unsung(carry)\n\nnot Blowy(carry)\n\nMyeloid(carry) and Acetous(carry) and Myeloid(carry) and Acetous(carry) -> Unsung(carry) -> therefore Unsung(carry) Unsung(carry) and Myeloid(carry) and forall x (Unsung(x) and Myeloid(x) -> Blowy(x)) -> therefore Blowy(carry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Wendeline is bodacious. Wendeline is expedient. Wendeline is wagnerian. Wendeline is austenitic. Wendeline is bicolor. Erich is bodacious. Erich is expedient. Erich is wagnerian. Erich is unplaced. Erich is austenitic. Erich is topping. Erich is bicolor. Elane is expedient. Elane is wagnerian. Elane is unplaced. All austenitic, unplaced things are bodacious. All topping, unplaced things are wagnerian. Round things are unplaced. If something is austenitic and unplaced then it is bicolor. Young, austenitic things are expedient. All topping things are unplaced. Young, expedient things are austenitic. If Elane is expedient and Elane is wagnerian then Elane is bicolor. Elane is bodacious.", "logic": "\nBodacious(wendeline)\nExpedient(wendeline)\nWagnerian(wendeline)\nAustenitic(wendeline)\nBicolor(wendeline)\nBodacious(erich)\nExpedient(erich)\nWagnerian(erich)\nUnplaced(erich)\nAustenitic(erich)\nTopping(erich)\nBicolor(erich)\nExpedient(elane)\nWagnerian(elane)\nUnplaced(elane)\nforall x (Austenitic(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Bodacious(x))\nforall x (Topping(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Wagnerian(x))\nforall x (Topping(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Austenitic(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Bicolor(x))\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Austenitic(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Topping(x) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Expedient(x) -> Austenitic(x))\nExpedient(elane) and Wagnerian(elane) -> Bicolor(elane)\n\nBodacious(elane)\n\nExpedient(elane) and Wagnerian(elane) and Expedient(elane) and Wagnerian(elane) -> Bicolor(elane) -> therefore Bicolor(elane) Bicolor(elane) and Expedient(elane) and forall x (Bicolor(x) and Expedient(x) -> Austenitic(x)) -> therefore Austenitic(elane) Austenitic(elane) and Unplaced(elane) and forall x (Austenitic(x) and Unplaced(x) -> Bodacious(x)) -> therefore Bodacious(elane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Cathrin is riming. Cathrin is whiplike. Cathrin is isolating. Cathrin is dynamical. Cathrin is caloric. Gloria is riming. Gloria is whiplike. Gloria is isolating. Gloria is unsheared. Gloria is dynamical. Gloria is abrasive. Gloria is caloric. Paco is whiplike. Paco is isolating. Paco is unsheared. All dynamical, unsheared things are riming. All abrasive, unsheared things are isolating. Round things are unsheared. If something is dynamical and unsheared then it is caloric. Young, dynamical things are whiplike. All abrasive things are unsheared. Young, whiplike things are dynamical. If Paco is whiplike and Paco is isolating then Paco is caloric. Paco is not riming.", "logic": "\nRiming(cathrin)\nWhiplike(cathrin)\nIsolating(cathrin)\nDynamical(cathrin)\nCaloric(cathrin)\nRiming(gloria)\nWhiplike(gloria)\nIsolating(gloria)\nUnsheared(gloria)\nDynamical(gloria)\nAbrasive(gloria)\nCaloric(gloria)\nWhiplike(paco)\nIsolating(paco)\nUnsheared(paco)\nforall x (Dynamical(x) and Unsheared(x) -> Riming(x))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) and Unsheared(x) -> Isolating(x))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Dynamical(x) and Unsheared(x) -> Caloric(x))\nforall x (Caloric(x) and Dynamical(x) -> Whiplike(x))\nforall x (Abrasive(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Caloric(x) and Whiplike(x) -> Dynamical(x))\nWhiplike(paco) and Isolating(paco) -> Caloric(paco)\n\nnot Riming(paco)\n\nWhiplike(paco) and Isolating(paco) and Whiplike(paco) and Isolating(paco) -> Caloric(paco) -> therefore Caloric(paco) Caloric(paco) and Whiplike(paco) and forall x (Caloric(x) and Whiplike(x) -> Dynamical(x)) -> therefore Dynamical(paco) Dynamical(paco) and Unsheared(paco) and forall x (Dynamical(x) and Unsheared(x) -> Riming(x)) -> therefore Riming(paco)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Lolita is seemly. Lolita is nonracial. Lolita is undue. Lolita is subsidised. Lolita is pareve. Lia is seemly. Lia is nonracial. Lia is undue. Lia is unfunny. Lia is subsidised. Lia is separable. Lia is pareve. Laurie is nonracial. Laurie is undue. Laurie is unfunny. All subsidised, unfunny things are seemly. All separable, unfunny things are undue. Round things are unfunny. If something is subsidised and unfunny then it is pareve. Young, subsidised things are nonracial. All separable things are unfunny. Young, nonracial things are subsidised. If Laurie is nonracial and Laurie is undue then Laurie is pareve. Lolita is not unfunny.", "logic": "\nSeemly(lolita)\nNonracial(lolita)\nUndue(lolita)\nSubsidised(lolita)\nPareve(lolita)\nSeemly(lia)\nNonracial(lia)\nUndue(lia)\nUnfunny(lia)\nSubsidised(lia)\nSeparable(lia)\nPareve(lia)\nNonracial(laurie)\nUndue(laurie)\nUnfunny(laurie)\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Unfunny(x) -> Seemly(x))\nforall x (Separable(x) and Unfunny(x) -> Undue(x))\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Unfunny(x))\nforall x (Subsidised(x) and Unfunny(x) -> Pareve(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) and Subsidised(x) -> Nonracial(x))\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Unfunny(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) and Nonracial(x) -> Subsidised(x))\nNonracial(laurie) and Undue(laurie) -> Pareve(laurie)\n\nnot Unfunny(lolita)\n\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Unfunny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Heather is straw. Heather is semestrial. Heather is affirmable. Heather is pyrrhic. Heather is unpleasant. Lavinie is straw. Lavinie is semestrial. Lavinie is affirmable. Lavinie is pressing. Lavinie is pyrrhic. Lavinie is tacky. Lavinie is unpleasant. Greer is semestrial. Greer is affirmable. Greer is pressing. All pyrrhic, pressing things are straw. All tacky, pressing things are affirmable. Round things are pressing. If something is pyrrhic and pressing then it is unpleasant. Young, pyrrhic things are semestrial. All tacky things are pressing. Young, semestrial things are pyrrhic. If Greer is semestrial and Greer is affirmable then Greer is unpleasant. Heather is tacky.", "logic": "\nStraw(heather)\nSemestrial(heather)\nAffirmable(heather)\nPyrrhic(heather)\nUnpleasant(heather)\nStraw(lavinie)\nSemestrial(lavinie)\nAffirmable(lavinie)\nPressing(lavinie)\nPyrrhic(lavinie)\nTacky(lavinie)\nUnpleasant(lavinie)\nSemestrial(greer)\nAffirmable(greer)\nPressing(greer)\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) and Pressing(x) -> Straw(x))\nforall x (Tacky(x) and Pressing(x) -> Affirmable(x))\nforall x (Tacky(x) -> Pressing(x))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) and Pressing(x) -> Unpleasant(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Pyrrhic(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Tacky(x) -> Pressing(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Semestrial(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nSemestrial(greer) and Affirmable(greer) -> Unpleasant(greer)\n\nTacky(heather)\n\nTacky(heather) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1675"} {"premises": "Rutger is plummy. Johnette is cecal. Johnette is judicable. If someone is heated and judicable then they are cecal. Green, plummy people are detersive. Young, heated people are cecal. If someone is vicinal then they are judicable. White, vicinal people are cecal. If someone is judicable then they are detersive. Big, detersive people are heated. If someone is detersive and heated then they are plummy. Rutger is plummy.", "logic": "\nPlummy(rutger)\nCecal(johnette)\nJudicable(johnette)\nforall x (Heated(x) and Judicable(x) -> Cecal(x))\nforall x (Vicinal(x) and Plummy(x) -> Detersive(x))\nforall x (Plummy(x) and Heated(x) -> Cecal(x))\nforall x (Vicinal(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Judicable(x) and Vicinal(x) -> Cecal(x))\nforall x (Judicable(x) -> Detersive(x))\nforall x (Cecal(x) and Detersive(x) -> Heated(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) and Heated(x) -> Plummy(x))\n\nPlummy(rutger)\n\ntherefore Plummy(rutger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Melli is nonprofit. Cora is wingless. Cora is unrifled. If someone is overfed and unrifled then they are wingless. Green, nonprofit people are dozen. Young, overfed people are wingless. If someone is cereal then they are unrifled. White, cereal people are wingless. If someone is unrifled then they are dozen. Big, dozen people are overfed. If someone is dozen and overfed then they are nonprofit. Cora is not wingless.", "logic": "\nNonprofit(melli)\nWingless(cora)\nUnrifled(cora)\nforall x (Overfed(x) and Unrifled(x) -> Wingless(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) and Nonprofit(x) -> Dozen(x))\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) and Overfed(x) -> Wingless(x))\nforall x (Cereal(x) -> Unrifled(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) and Cereal(x) -> Wingless(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> Dozen(x))\nforall x (Wingless(x) and Dozen(x) -> Overfed(x))\nforall x (Dozen(x) and Overfed(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\n\nnot Wingless(cora)\n\ntherefore Wingless(cora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Merrick is repugnant. Beaufort is objective. Beaufort is pyknic. If someone is lincolnian and pyknic then they are objective. Green, repugnant people are gnomish. Young, lincolnian people are objective. If someone is onstage then they are pyknic. White, onstage people are objective. If someone is pyknic then they are gnomish. Big, gnomish people are lincolnian. If someone is gnomish and lincolnian then they are repugnant. Beaufort is gnomish.", "logic": "\nRepugnant(merrick)\nObjective(beaufort)\nPyknic(beaufort)\nforall x (Lincolnian(x) and Pyknic(x) -> Objective(x))\nforall x (Onstage(x) and Repugnant(x) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Repugnant(x) and Lincolnian(x) -> Objective(x))\nforall x (Onstage(x) -> Pyknic(x))\nforall x (Pyknic(x) and Onstage(x) -> Objective(x))\nforall x (Pyknic(x) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Objective(x) and Gnomish(x) -> Lincolnian(x))\nforall x (Gnomish(x) and Lincolnian(x) -> Repugnant(x))\n\nGnomish(beaufort)\n\nPyknic(beaufort) and forall x (Pyknic(x) -> Gnomish(x)) -> therefore Gnomish(beaufort)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Jared is miniature. Sydney is biped. Sydney is mandibular. If someone is kaput and mandibular then they are biped. Green, miniature people are latent. Young, kaput people are biped. If someone is bubbly then they are mandibular. White, bubbly people are biped. If someone is mandibular then they are latent. Big, latent people are kaput. If someone is latent and kaput then they are miniature. Sydney is not latent.", "logic": "\nMiniature(jared)\nBiped(sydney)\nMandibular(sydney)\nforall x (Kaput(x) and Mandibular(x) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Bubbly(x) and Miniature(x) -> Latent(x))\nforall x (Miniature(x) and Kaput(x) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Bubbly(x) -> Mandibular(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) and Bubbly(x) -> Biped(x))\nforall x (Mandibular(x) -> Latent(x))\nforall x (Biped(x) and Latent(x) -> Kaput(x))\nforall x (Latent(x) and Kaput(x) -> Miniature(x))\n\nnot Latent(sydney)\n\nMandibular(sydney) and forall x (Mandibular(x) -> Latent(x)) -> therefore Latent(sydney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Saundra is subsonic. Elna is stabilised. Elna is procumbent. If someone is thwarting and procumbent then they are stabilised. Green, subsonic people are thriftless. Young, thwarting people are stabilised. If someone is workaday then they are procumbent. White, workaday people are stabilised. If someone is procumbent then they are thriftless. Big, thriftless people are thwarting. If someone is thriftless and thwarting then they are subsonic. Elna is thwarting.", "logic": "\nSubsonic(saundra)\nStabilised(elna)\nProcumbent(elna)\nforall x (Thwarting(x) and Procumbent(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Workaday(x) and Subsonic(x) -> Thriftless(x))\nforall x (Subsonic(x) and Thwarting(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Workaday(x) -> Procumbent(x))\nforall x (Procumbent(x) and Workaday(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Procumbent(x) -> Thriftless(x))\nforall x (Stabilised(x) and Thriftless(x) -> Thwarting(x))\nforall x (Thriftless(x) and Thwarting(x) -> Subsonic(x))\n\nThwarting(elna)\n\nProcumbent(elna) and forall x (Procumbent(x) -> Thriftless(x)) -> therefore Thriftless(elna) Stabilised(elna) and Thriftless(elna) and forall x (Stabilised(x) and Thriftless(x) -> Thwarting(x)) -> therefore Thwarting(elna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Rycca is moneran. Jobey is deathlike. Jobey is curt. If someone is sixth and curt then they are deathlike. Green, moneran people are viscous. Young, sixth people are deathlike. If someone is disposed then they are curt. White, disposed people are deathlike. If someone is curt then they are viscous. Big, viscous people are sixth. If someone is viscous and sixth then they are moneran. Jobey is not sixth.", "logic": "\nMoneran(rycca)\nDeathlike(jobey)\nCurt(jobey)\nforall x (Sixth(x) and Curt(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) and Moneran(x) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) and Sixth(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> Curt(x))\nforall x (Curt(x) and Disposed(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Curt(x) -> Viscous(x))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) and Viscous(x) -> Sixth(x))\nforall x (Viscous(x) and Sixth(x) -> Moneran(x))\n\nnot Sixth(jobey)\n\nCurt(jobey) and forall x (Curt(x) -> Viscous(x)) -> therefore Viscous(jobey) Deathlike(jobey) and Viscous(jobey) and forall x (Deathlike(x) and Viscous(x) -> Sixth(x)) -> therefore Sixth(jobey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Lillis is bowelless. Adelice is doubtful. Adelice is uninsured. If someone is returnable and uninsured then they are doubtful. Green, bowelless people are infamous. Young, returnable people are doubtful. If someone is bistred then they are uninsured. White, bistred people are doubtful. If someone is uninsured then they are infamous. Big, infamous people are returnable. If someone is infamous and returnable then they are bowelless. Adelice is bowelless.", "logic": "\nBowelless(lillis)\nDoubtful(adelice)\nUninsured(adelice)\nforall x (Returnable(x) and Uninsured(x) -> Doubtful(x))\nforall x (Bistred(x) and Bowelless(x) -> Infamous(x))\nforall x (Bowelless(x) and Returnable(x) -> Doubtful(x))\nforall x (Bistred(x) -> Uninsured(x))\nforall x (Uninsured(x) and Bistred(x) -> Doubtful(x))\nforall x (Uninsured(x) -> Infamous(x))\nforall x (Doubtful(x) and Infamous(x) -> Returnable(x))\nforall x (Infamous(x) and Returnable(x) -> Bowelless(x))\n\nBowelless(adelice)\n\nUninsured(adelice) and forall x (Uninsured(x) -> Infamous(x)) -> therefore Infamous(adelice) Uninsured(adelice) and forall x (Uninsured(x) -> Infamous(x)) -> therefore Infamous(adelice) Doubtful(adelice) and Infamous(adelice) and forall x (Doubtful(x) and Infamous(x) -> Returnable(x)) -> therefore Returnable(adelice) Infamous(adelice) and Returnable(adelice) and forall x (Infamous(x) and Returnable(x) -> Bowelless(x)) -> therefore Bowelless(adelice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Lona is decided. Luther is tongueless. Luther is burrlike. If someone is broadnosed and burrlike then they are tongueless. Green, decided people are fearful. Young, broadnosed people are tongueless. If someone is tumid then they are burrlike. White, tumid people are tongueless. If someone is burrlike then they are fearful. Big, fearful people are broadnosed. If someone is fearful and broadnosed then they are decided. Luther is not decided.", "logic": "\nDecided(lona)\nTongueless(luther)\nBurrlike(luther)\nforall x (Broadnosed(x) and Burrlike(x) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Tumid(x) and Decided(x) -> Fearful(x))\nforall x (Decided(x) and Broadnosed(x) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Tumid(x) -> Burrlike(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) and Tumid(x) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Burrlike(x) -> Fearful(x))\nforall x (Tongueless(x) and Fearful(x) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Fearful(x) and Broadnosed(x) -> Decided(x))\n\nnot Decided(luther)\n\nBurrlike(luther) and forall x (Burrlike(x) -> Fearful(x)) -> therefore Fearful(luther) Burrlike(luther) and forall x (Burrlike(x) -> Fearful(x)) -> therefore Fearful(luther) Tongueless(luther) and Fearful(luther) and forall x (Tongueless(x) and Fearful(x) -> Broadnosed(x)) -> therefore Broadnosed(luther) Fearful(luther) and Broadnosed(luther) and forall x (Fearful(x) and Broadnosed(x) -> Decided(x)) -> therefore Decided(luther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Ashby is mastoid. Bucky is rocky. Bucky is jaded. If someone is adept and jaded then they are rocky. Green, mastoid people are unloving. Young, adept people are rocky. If someone is neuralgic then they are jaded. White, neuralgic people are rocky. If someone is jaded then they are unloving. Big, unloving people are adept. If someone is unloving and adept then they are mastoid. Ashby is not jaded.", "logic": "\nMastoid(ashby)\nRocky(bucky)\nJaded(bucky)\nforall x (Adept(x) and Jaded(x) -> Rocky(x))\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) and Mastoid(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) and Adept(x) -> Rocky(x))\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) -> Jaded(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) and Neuralgic(x) -> Rocky(x))\nforall x (Jaded(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Rocky(x) and Unloving(x) -> Adept(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) and Adept(x) -> Mastoid(x))\n\nnot Jaded(ashby)\n\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) -> Jaded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Wally is verminous. Leorah is brutish. Leorah is trilateral. If someone is sidereal and trilateral then they are brutish. Green, verminous people are zygomatic. Young, sidereal people are brutish. If someone is flashy then they are trilateral. White, flashy people are brutish. If someone is trilateral then they are zygomatic. Big, zygomatic people are sidereal. If someone is zygomatic and sidereal then they are verminous. Wally is zygomatic.", "logic": "\nVerminous(wally)\nBrutish(leorah)\nTrilateral(leorah)\nforall x (Sidereal(x) and Trilateral(x) -> Brutish(x))\nforall x (Flashy(x) and Verminous(x) -> Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Verminous(x) and Sidereal(x) -> Brutish(x))\nforall x (Flashy(x) -> Trilateral(x))\nforall x (Trilateral(x) and Flashy(x) -> Brutish(x))\nforall x (Trilateral(x) -> Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Brutish(x) and Zygomatic(x) -> Sidereal(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and Sidereal(x) -> Verminous(x))\n\nZygomatic(wally)\n\nforall x (Trilateral(x) -> Zygomatic(x)) <- forall x (Flashy(x) -> Trilateral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Janis is methodist. Grethel is blockading. Grethel is cutaneous. If someone is anabiotic and cutaneous then they are blockading. Green, methodist people are outer. Young, anabiotic people are blockading. If someone is inboard then they are cutaneous. White, inboard people are blockading. If someone is cutaneous then they are outer. Big, outer people are anabiotic. If someone is outer and anabiotic then they are methodist. Janis is not anabiotic.", "logic": "\nMethodist(janis)\nBlockading(grethel)\nCutaneous(grethel)\nforall x (Anabiotic(x) and Cutaneous(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) and Methodist(x) -> Outer(x))\nforall x (Methodist(x) and Anabiotic(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) and Inboard(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Outer(x))\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Outer(x) -> Anabiotic(x))\nforall x (Outer(x) and Anabiotic(x) -> Methodist(x))\n\nnot Anabiotic(janis)\n\nforall x (Blockading(x) and Outer(x) -> Anabiotic(x)) <- forall x (Anabiotic(x) and Cutaneous(x) -> Blockading(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Davis is cybernetic. Joyous is undivided. Joyous is empathetic. If someone is facial and empathetic then they are undivided. Green, cybernetic people are imperial. Young, facial people are undivided. If someone is throwback then they are empathetic. White, throwback people are undivided. If someone is empathetic then they are imperial. Big, imperial people are facial. If someone is imperial and facial then they are cybernetic. Davis is undivided.", "logic": "\nCybernetic(davis)\nUndivided(joyous)\nEmpathetic(joyous)\nforall x (Facial(x) and Empathetic(x) -> Undivided(x))\nforall x (Throwback(x) and Cybernetic(x) -> Imperial(x))\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) and Facial(x) -> Undivided(x))\nforall x (Throwback(x) -> Empathetic(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) and Throwback(x) -> Undivided(x))\nforall x (Empathetic(x) -> Imperial(x))\nforall x (Undivided(x) and Imperial(x) -> Facial(x))\nforall x (Imperial(x) and Facial(x) -> Cybernetic(x))\n\nUndivided(davis)\n\nforall x (Cybernetic(x) and Facial(x) -> Undivided(x)) <- forall x (Undivided(x) and Imperial(x) -> Facial(x)) <- forall x (Facial(x) and Empathetic(x) -> Undivided(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Patrik is masked. Gamaliel is ghanaian. Gamaliel is fractional. If someone is monogenic and fractional then they are ghanaian. Green, masked people are mutable. Young, monogenic people are ghanaian. If someone is tamil then they are fractional. White, tamil people are ghanaian. If someone is fractional then they are mutable. Big, mutable people are monogenic. If someone is mutable and monogenic then they are masked. Patrik is not tamil.", "logic": "\nMasked(patrik)\nGhanaian(gamaliel)\nFractional(gamaliel)\nforall x (Monogenic(x) and Fractional(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Tamil(x) and Masked(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Masked(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Tamil(x) -> Fractional(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) and Tamil(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Fractional(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) and Mutable(x) -> Monogenic(x))\nforall x (Mutable(x) and Monogenic(x) -> Masked(x))\n\nnot Tamil(patrik)\n\nnot Tamil(patrik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Louis is snafu. Annadiane is trusted. Annadiane is captious. If someone is continual and captious then they are trusted. Green, snafu people are generous. Young, continual people are trusted. If someone is requisite then they are captious. White, requisite people are trusted. If someone is captious then they are generous. Big, generous people are continual. If someone is generous and continual then they are snafu. Annadiane is requisite.", "logic": "\nSnafu(louis)\nTrusted(annadiane)\nCaptious(annadiane)\nforall x (Continual(x) and Captious(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) and Snafu(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Snafu(x) and Continual(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Requisite(x) -> Captious(x))\nforall x (Captious(x) and Requisite(x) -> Trusted(x))\nforall x (Captious(x) -> Generous(x))\nforall x (Trusted(x) and Generous(x) -> Continual(x))\nforall x (Generous(x) and Continual(x) -> Snafu(x))\n\nRequisite(annadiane)\n\nRequisite(annadiane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Camile is sobering. Sallie is cynical. Sallie is frothy. If someone is isothermal and frothy then they are cynical. Green, sobering people are dead. Young, isothermal people are cynical. If someone is influent then they are frothy. White, influent people are cynical. If someone is frothy then they are dead. Big, dead people are isothermal. If someone is dead and isothermal then they are sobering. Sallie is not smart.", "logic": "\nSobering(camile)\nCynical(sallie)\nFrothy(sallie)\nforall x (Isothermal(x) and Frothy(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Influent(x) and Sobering(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Sobering(x) and Isothermal(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Influent(x) -> Frothy(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) and Influent(x) -> Cynical(x))\nforall x (Frothy(x) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Cynical(x) and Dead(x) -> Isothermal(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) and Isothermal(x) -> Sobering(x))\n\nnot Smart(sallie)\n\nnot Smart(sallie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Rhea is wiccan. Silvio is marbled. Silvio is dogged. If someone is educated and dogged then they are marbled. Green, wiccan people are franciscan. Young, educated people are marbled. If someone is crumbly then they are dogged. White, crumbly people are marbled. If someone is dogged then they are franciscan. Big, franciscan people are educated. If someone is franciscan and educated then they are wiccan. Rhea is smart.", "logic": "\nWiccan(rhea)\nMarbled(silvio)\nDogged(silvio)\nforall x (Educated(x) and Dogged(x) -> Marbled(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) and Wiccan(x) -> Franciscan(x))\nforall x (Wiccan(x) and Educated(x) -> Marbled(x))\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Dogged(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) and Crumbly(x) -> Marbled(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) -> Franciscan(x))\nforall x (Marbled(x) and Franciscan(x) -> Educated(x))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) and Educated(x) -> Wiccan(x))\n\nSmart(rhea)\n\nSmart(rhea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-505"} {"premises": "Riccardo is cleanly. All allergic things are cleanly. Furry, darwinian things are allergic. Riccardo is cleanly.", "logic": "\nCleanly(riccardo)\nforall x (Allergic(x) -> Cleanly(x))\nforall x (Nonuple(x) and Darwinian(x) -> Allergic(x))\n\nCleanly(riccardo)\n\ntherefore Cleanly(riccardo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5660"} {"premises": "Mervin is azygos. All hindu things are azygos. Furry, bawdy things are hindu. Mervin is not azygos.", "logic": "\nAzygos(mervin)\nforall x (Hindu(x) -> Azygos(x))\nforall x (Oxidative(x) and Bawdy(x) -> Hindu(x))\n\nnot Azygos(mervin)\n\ntherefore Azygos(mervin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5660"} {"premises": "Crawford is uninvited. All merry things are uninvited. Furry, coriaceous things are merry. Crawford is not merry.", "logic": "\nUninvited(crawford)\nforall x (Merry(x) -> Uninvited(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Merry(x))\n\nnot Merry(crawford)\n\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) and Coriaceous(x) -> Merry(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5660"} {"premises": "Kare is above. All impersonal things are above. Furry, motivated things are impersonal. Kare is kind.", "logic": "\nAbove(kare)\nforall x (Impersonal(x) -> Above(x))\nforall x (Humiliated(x) and Motivated(x) -> Impersonal(x))\n\nKind(kare)\n\nKind(kare) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5660"} {"premises": "Klee is abbatial. Klee is croaky. Klee is monatomic. Klee is virulent. Klee is tweedy. Klee is appraising. Oswell is monatomic. Oswell is appraising. Gordan is monatomic. Gordan is virulent. Gordan is tweedy. Gordan is appraising. If Gordan is monatomic and Gordan is abbatial then Gordan is tweedy. If someone is monatomic and tweedy then they are abbatial. All appraising people are tweedy. Gordan is tweedy.", "logic": "\nAbbatial(klee)\nCroaky(klee)\nMonatomic(klee)\nVirulent(klee)\nTweedy(klee)\nAppraising(klee)\nMonatomic(oswell)\nAppraising(oswell)\nMonatomic(gordan)\nVirulent(gordan)\nTweedy(gordan)\nAppraising(gordan)\nMonatomic(gordan) and Abbatial(gordan) -> Tweedy(gordan)\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Tweedy(x) -> Abbatial(x))\nforall x (Appraising(x) -> Tweedy(x))\n\nTweedy(gordan)\n\ntherefore Tweedy(gordan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Cherish is puerile. Cherish is temporal. Cherish is implicit. Cherish is musical. Cherish is unartistic. Cherish is stunned. Gita is implicit. Gita is stunned. Susanetta is implicit. Susanetta is musical. Susanetta is unartistic. Susanetta is stunned. If Susanetta is implicit and Susanetta is puerile then Susanetta is unartistic. If someone is implicit and unartistic then they are puerile. All stunned people are unartistic. Gita is not implicit.", "logic": "\nPuerile(cherish)\nTemporal(cherish)\nImplicit(cherish)\nMusical(cherish)\nUnartistic(cherish)\nStunned(cherish)\nImplicit(gita)\nStunned(gita)\nImplicit(susanetta)\nMusical(susanetta)\nUnartistic(susanetta)\nStunned(susanetta)\nImplicit(susanetta) and Puerile(susanetta) -> Unartistic(susanetta)\nforall x (Implicit(x) and Unartistic(x) -> Puerile(x))\nforall x (Stunned(x) -> Unartistic(x))\n\nnot Implicit(gita)\n\ntherefore Implicit(gita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Tiebold is semisolid. Tiebold is equal. Tiebold is unmannered. Tiebold is witting. Tiebold is pitted. Tiebold is strenuous. Susannah is unmannered. Susannah is strenuous. Jedediah is unmannered. Jedediah is witting. Jedediah is pitted. Jedediah is strenuous. If Jedediah is unmannered and Jedediah is semisolid then Jedediah is pitted. If someone is unmannered and pitted then they are semisolid. All strenuous people are pitted. Jedediah is semisolid.", "logic": "\nSemisolid(tiebold)\nEqual(tiebold)\nUnmannered(tiebold)\nWitting(tiebold)\nPitted(tiebold)\nStrenuous(tiebold)\nUnmannered(susannah)\nStrenuous(susannah)\nUnmannered(jedediah)\nWitting(jedediah)\nPitted(jedediah)\nStrenuous(jedediah)\nUnmannered(jedediah) and Semisolid(jedediah) -> Pitted(jedediah)\nforall x (Unmannered(x) and Pitted(x) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Strenuous(x) -> Pitted(x))\n\nSemisolid(jedediah)\n\nUnmannered(jedediah) and Pitted(jedediah) and forall x (Unmannered(x) and Pitted(x) -> Semisolid(x)) -> therefore Semisolid(jedediah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Florry is exigent. Florry is bimotored. Florry is elder. Florry is punishable. Florry is jainist. Florry is agonized. Aridatha is elder. Aridatha is agonized. Fawna is elder. Fawna is punishable. Fawna is jainist. Fawna is agonized. If Fawna is elder and Fawna is exigent then Fawna is jainist. If someone is elder and jainist then they are exigent. All agonized people are jainist. Aridatha is not jainist.", "logic": "\nExigent(florry)\nBimotored(florry)\nElder(florry)\nPunishable(florry)\nJainist(florry)\nAgonized(florry)\nElder(aridatha)\nAgonized(aridatha)\nElder(fawna)\nPunishable(fawna)\nJainist(fawna)\nAgonized(fawna)\nElder(fawna) and Exigent(fawna) -> Jainist(fawna)\nforall x (Elder(x) and Jainist(x) -> Exigent(x))\nforall x (Agonized(x) -> Jainist(x))\n\nnot Jainist(aridatha)\n\nAgonized(aridatha) and forall x (Agonized(x) -> Jainist(x)) -> therefore Jainist(aridatha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Bev is wrongful. Bev is guttural. Bev is glassy. Bev is cometary. Bev is above. Bev is grueling. Millicent is glassy. Millicent is grueling. Candida is glassy. Candida is cometary. Candida is above. Candida is grueling. If Candida is glassy and Candida is wrongful then Candida is above. If someone is glassy and above then they are wrongful. All grueling people are above. Millicent is wrongful.", "logic": "\nWrongful(bev)\nGuttural(bev)\nGlassy(bev)\nCometary(bev)\nAbove(bev)\nGrueling(bev)\nGlassy(millicent)\nGrueling(millicent)\nGlassy(candida)\nCometary(candida)\nAbove(candida)\nGrueling(candida)\nGlassy(candida) and Wrongful(candida) -> Above(candida)\nforall x (Glassy(x) and Above(x) -> Wrongful(x))\nforall x (Grueling(x) -> Above(x))\n\nWrongful(millicent)\n\nGrueling(millicent) and forall x (Grueling(x) -> Above(x)) -> therefore Above(millicent) Glassy(millicent) and Above(millicent) and forall x (Glassy(x) and Above(x) -> Wrongful(x)) -> therefore Wrongful(millicent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Ilsa is negotiable. Ilsa is bistered. Ilsa is unbloody. Ilsa is protean. Ilsa is cacophonic. Ilsa is bleak. Pauletta is unbloody. Pauletta is bleak. Jannel is unbloody. Jannel is protean. Jannel is cacophonic. Jannel is bleak. If Jannel is unbloody and Jannel is negotiable then Jannel is cacophonic. If someone is unbloody and cacophonic then they are negotiable. All bleak people are cacophonic. Pauletta is not negotiable.", "logic": "\nNegotiable(ilsa)\nBistered(ilsa)\nUnbloody(ilsa)\nProtean(ilsa)\nCacophonic(ilsa)\nBleak(ilsa)\nUnbloody(pauletta)\nBleak(pauletta)\nUnbloody(jannel)\nProtean(jannel)\nCacophonic(jannel)\nBleak(jannel)\nUnbloody(jannel) and Negotiable(jannel) -> Cacophonic(jannel)\nforall x (Unbloody(x) and Cacophonic(x) -> Negotiable(x))\nforall x (Bleak(x) -> Cacophonic(x))\n\nnot Negotiable(pauletta)\n\nBleak(pauletta) and forall x (Bleak(x) -> Cacophonic(x)) -> therefore Cacophonic(pauletta) Unbloody(pauletta) and Cacophonic(pauletta) and forall x (Unbloody(x) and Cacophonic(x) -> Negotiable(x)) -> therefore Negotiable(pauletta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Leonora is alkaloidal. Leonora is roughish. Leonora is general. Leonora is boskopoid. Leonora is palliative. Leonora is undeniable. Erda is general. Erda is undeniable. Edee is general. Edee is boskopoid. Edee is palliative. Edee is undeniable. If Edee is general and Edee is alkaloidal then Edee is palliative. If someone is general and palliative then they are alkaloidal. All undeniable people are palliative. Edee is not blue.", "logic": "\nAlkaloidal(leonora)\nRoughish(leonora)\nGeneral(leonora)\nBoskopoid(leonora)\nPalliative(leonora)\nUndeniable(leonora)\nGeneral(erda)\nUndeniable(erda)\nGeneral(edee)\nBoskopoid(edee)\nPalliative(edee)\nUndeniable(edee)\nGeneral(edee) and Alkaloidal(edee) -> Palliative(edee)\nforall x (General(x) and Palliative(x) -> Alkaloidal(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Palliative(x))\n\nnot Blue(edee)\n\nnot Blue(edee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Wayne is unfed. Wayne is wonderful. Wayne is spurting. Wayne is lithe. Wayne is labouring. Wayne is manorial. Karen is spurting. Karen is manorial. Taddeo is spurting. Taddeo is lithe. Taddeo is labouring. Taddeo is manorial. If Taddeo is spurting and Taddeo is unfed then Taddeo is labouring. If someone is spurting and labouring then they are unfed. All manorial people are labouring. Wayne is blue.", "logic": "\nUnfed(wayne)\nWonderful(wayne)\nSpurting(wayne)\nLithe(wayne)\nLabouring(wayne)\nManorial(wayne)\nSpurting(karen)\nManorial(karen)\nSpurting(taddeo)\nLithe(taddeo)\nLabouring(taddeo)\nManorial(taddeo)\nSpurting(taddeo) and Unfed(taddeo) -> Labouring(taddeo)\nforall x (Spurting(x) and Labouring(x) -> Unfed(x))\nforall x (Manorial(x) -> Labouring(x))\n\nBlue(wayne)\n\nBlue(wayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Henderson is violative. Henderson is nominated. Henderson is flowery. Henderson is antimonial. Henderson is moslem. Henderson is fledgeling. Vania is flowery. Vania is fledgeling. Waine is flowery. Waine is antimonial. Waine is moslem. Waine is fledgeling. If Waine is flowery and Waine is violative then Waine is moslem. If someone is flowery and moslem then they are violative. All fledgeling people are moslem. Vania is not nominated.", "logic": "\nViolative(henderson)\nNominated(henderson)\nFlowery(henderson)\nAntimonial(henderson)\nMoslem(henderson)\nFledgeling(henderson)\nFlowery(vania)\nFledgeling(vania)\nFlowery(waine)\nAntimonial(waine)\nMoslem(waine)\nFledgeling(waine)\nFlowery(waine) and Violative(waine) -> Moslem(waine)\nforall x (Flowery(x) and Moslem(x) -> Violative(x))\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) -> Moslem(x))\n\nnot Nominated(vania)\n\nnot Nominated(vania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Valerye is crenulate. Valerye is afflicted. Valerye is steadying. Valerye is oddish. Valerye is cupular. Valerye is jealous. Suzi is steadying. Suzi is jealous. Anatol is steadying. Anatol is oddish. Anatol is cupular. Anatol is jealous. If Anatol is steadying and Anatol is crenulate then Anatol is cupular. If someone is steadying and cupular then they are crenulate. All jealous people are cupular. Suzi is blue.", "logic": "\nCrenulate(valerye)\nAfflicted(valerye)\nSteadying(valerye)\nOddish(valerye)\nCupular(valerye)\nJealous(valerye)\nSteadying(suzi)\nJealous(suzi)\nSteadying(anatol)\nOddish(anatol)\nCupular(anatol)\nJealous(anatol)\nSteadying(anatol) and Crenulate(anatol) -> Cupular(anatol)\nforall x (Steadying(x) and Cupular(x) -> Crenulate(x))\nforall x (Jealous(x) -> Cupular(x))\n\nBlue(suzi)\n\nBlue(suzi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Grant is maculate. Grant is unloved. Grant is telephonic. Grant is palliative. Grant is substitute. Grant is rapt. Joanna is telephonic. Joanna is rapt. Ilene is telephonic. Ilene is palliative. Ilene is substitute. Ilene is rapt. If Ilene is telephonic and Ilene is maculate then Ilene is substitute. If someone is telephonic and substitute then they are maculate. All rapt people are substitute. Joanna is not palliative.", "logic": "\nMaculate(grant)\nUnloved(grant)\nTelephonic(grant)\nPalliative(grant)\nSubstitute(grant)\nRapt(grant)\nTelephonic(joanna)\nRapt(joanna)\nTelephonic(ilene)\nPalliative(ilene)\nSubstitute(ilene)\nRapt(ilene)\nTelephonic(ilene) and Maculate(ilene) -> Substitute(ilene)\nforall x (Telephonic(x) and Substitute(x) -> Maculate(x))\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Substitute(x))\n\nnot Palliative(joanna)\n\nnot Palliative(joanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "Rochella is numerous. Rochella is soapy. Rochella is wolflike. Rochella is gangrenous. Rochella is bulbous. Rochella is glossy. Maryjo is wolflike. Maryjo is glossy. Cora is wolflike. Cora is gangrenous. Cora is bulbous. Cora is glossy. If Cora is wolflike and Cora is numerous then Cora is bulbous. If someone is wolflike and bulbous then they are numerous. All glossy people are bulbous. Cora is soapy.", "logic": "\nNumerous(rochella)\nSoapy(rochella)\nWolflike(rochella)\nGangrenous(rochella)\nBulbous(rochella)\nGlossy(rochella)\nWolflike(maryjo)\nGlossy(maryjo)\nWolflike(cora)\nGangrenous(cora)\nBulbous(cora)\nGlossy(cora)\nWolflike(cora) and Numerous(cora) -> Bulbous(cora)\nforall x (Wolflike(x) and Bulbous(x) -> Numerous(x))\nforall x (Glossy(x) -> Bulbous(x))\n\nSoapy(cora)\n\nSoapy(cora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-771"} {"premises": "The morgana char the murphy. The morgana jest the murphy. The murphy char the morgana. The murphy is ocellated. The murphy is carolean. The murphy jest the morgana. The murphy jest the jordana. The jordana does not eat the morgana. The jordana char the murphy. The jordana is ocellated. The jordana is unmodified. The jordana is not flash. The jordana is carolean. The jordana petition the morgana. The jordana does not visit the morgana. If the murphy jest the morgana and the murphy petition the morgana then the morgana is ocellated. If something char the jordana then it char the murphy. If something jest the murphy and the murphy char the jordana then the murphy char the morgana. If something char the murphy and it is not carolean then it petition the morgana. If something jest the jordana then the jordana is ocellated. If something petition the murphy then the murphy does not eat the jordana. If something is flash then it jest the murphy. If the morgana is carolean then the morgana does not visit the murphy. The morgana jest the murphy.", "logic": "\nChar(morgana, murphy)\nJest(morgana, murphy)\nChar(murphy, morgana)\nOcellated(murphy)\nCarolean(murphy)\nJest(murphy, morgana)\nJest(murphy, jordana)\nnot Char(jordana, morgana)\nChar(jordana, murphy)\nOcellated(jordana)\nUnmodified(jordana)\nnot Flash(jordana)\nCarolean(jordana)\nPetition(jordana, morgana)\nnot Jest(jordana, morgana)\nJest(murphy, morgana) and Petition(murphy, morgana) -> Ocellated(morgana)\nforall x (Char(x, jordana) -> Char(x, murphy))\nforall x (Jest(x, murphy) and Char(murphy, jordana) -> Char(murphy, morgana))\nforall x (Char(x, murphy) and not Carolean(x) -> Petition(x, morgana))\nforall x (Jest(x, jordana) -> Ocellated(jordana))\nforall x (Petition(x, murphy) -> not Char(murphy, jordana))\nforall x (Flash(x) -> Jest(x, murphy))\nCarolean(morgana) -> not Jest(morgana, murphy)\n\nJest(morgana, murphy)\n\ntherefore Jest(morgana, murphy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4676"} {"premises": "The lanette underline the gwendolen. The lanette tower the gwendolen. The gwendolen underline the lanette. The gwendolen is shrewd. The gwendolen is cylindric. The gwendolen tower the lanette. The gwendolen tower the nickie. The nickie does not eat the lanette. The nickie underline the gwendolen. The nickie is shrewd. The nickie is micro. The nickie is not cautious. The nickie is cylindric. The nickie arrogate the lanette. The nickie does not visit the lanette. If the gwendolen tower the lanette and the gwendolen arrogate the lanette then the lanette is shrewd. If something underline the nickie then it underline the gwendolen. If something tower the gwendolen and the gwendolen underline the nickie then the gwendolen underline the lanette. If something underline the gwendolen and it is not cylindric then it arrogate the lanette. If something tower the nickie then the nickie is shrewd. If something arrogate the gwendolen then the gwendolen does not eat the nickie. If something is cautious then it tower the gwendolen. If the lanette is cylindric then the lanette does not visit the gwendolen. The nickie does not eat the gwendolen.", "logic": "\nUnderline(lanette, gwendolen)\nTower(lanette, gwendolen)\nUnderline(gwendolen, lanette)\nShrewd(gwendolen)\nCylindric(gwendolen)\nTower(gwendolen, lanette)\nTower(gwendolen, nickie)\nnot Underline(nickie, lanette)\nUnderline(nickie, gwendolen)\nShrewd(nickie)\nMicro(nickie)\nnot Cautious(nickie)\nCylindric(nickie)\nArrogate(nickie, lanette)\nnot Tower(nickie, lanette)\nTower(gwendolen, lanette) and Arrogate(gwendolen, lanette) -> Shrewd(lanette)\nforall x (Underline(x, nickie) -> Underline(x, gwendolen))\nforall x (Tower(x, gwendolen) and Underline(gwendolen, nickie) -> Underline(gwendolen, lanette))\nforall x (Underline(x, gwendolen) and not Cylindric(x) -> Arrogate(x, lanette))\nforall x (Tower(x, nickie) -> Shrewd(nickie))\nforall x (Arrogate(x, gwendolen) -> not Underline(gwendolen, nickie))\nforall x (Cautious(x) -> Tower(x, gwendolen))\nCylindric(lanette) -> not Tower(lanette, gwendolen)\n\nnot Underline(nickie, gwendolen)\n\ntherefore Underline(nickie, gwendolen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4676"} {"premises": "The netta defeat the eolande. The netta garner the eolande. The eolande defeat the netta. The eolande is curricular. The eolande is compatible. The eolande garner the netta. The eolande garner the nanine. The nanine does not eat the netta. The nanine defeat the eolande. The nanine is curricular. The nanine is solid. The nanine is not spermatic. The nanine is compatible. The nanine drum the netta. The nanine does not visit the netta. If the eolande garner the netta and the eolande drum the netta then the netta is curricular. If something defeat the nanine then it defeat the eolande. If something garner the eolande and the eolande defeat the nanine then the eolande defeat the netta. If something defeat the eolande and it is not compatible then it drum the netta. If something garner the nanine then the nanine is curricular. If something drum the eolande then the eolande does not eat the nanine. If something is spermatic then it garner the eolande. If the netta is compatible then the netta does not visit the eolande. The eolande does not eat the eolande.", "logic": "\nDefeat(netta, eolande)\nGarner(netta, eolande)\nDefeat(eolande, netta)\nCurricular(eolande)\nCompatible(eolande)\nGarner(eolande, netta)\nGarner(eolande, nanine)\nnot Defeat(nanine, netta)\nDefeat(nanine, eolande)\nCurricular(nanine)\nSolid(nanine)\nnot Spermatic(nanine)\nCompatible(nanine)\nDrum(nanine, netta)\nnot Garner(nanine, netta)\nGarner(eolande, netta) and Drum(eolande, netta) -> Curricular(netta)\nforall x (Defeat(x, nanine) -> Defeat(x, eolande))\nforall x (Garner(x, eolande) and Defeat(eolande, nanine) -> Defeat(eolande, netta))\nforall x (Defeat(x, eolande) and not Compatible(x) -> Drum(x, netta))\nforall x (Garner(x, nanine) -> Curricular(nanine))\nforall x (Drum(x, eolande) -> not Defeat(eolande, nanine))\nforall x (Spermatic(x) -> Garner(x, eolande))\nCompatible(netta) -> not Garner(netta, eolande)\n\nnot Defeat(eolande, eolande)\n\nforall x (Defeat(x, nanine) -> Defeat(x, eolande)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4676"} {"premises": "The dario masturbate the rosemarie. The dario register the rosemarie. The rosemarie masturbate the dario. The rosemarie is indexless. The rosemarie is drilled. The rosemarie register the dario. The rosemarie register the davis. The davis does not eat the dario. The davis masturbate the rosemarie. The davis is indexless. The davis is organic. The davis is not misplaced. The davis is drilled. The davis miniate the dario. The davis does not visit the dario. If the rosemarie register the dario and the rosemarie miniate the dario then the dario is indexless. If something masturbate the davis then it masturbate the rosemarie. If something register the rosemarie and the rosemarie masturbate the davis then the rosemarie masturbate the dario. If something masturbate the rosemarie and it is not drilled then it miniate the dario. If something register the davis then the davis is indexless. If something miniate the rosemarie then the rosemarie does not eat the davis. If something is misplaced then it register the rosemarie. If the dario is drilled then the dario does not visit the rosemarie. The rosemarie miniate the rosemarie.", "logic": "\nMasturbate(dario, rosemarie)\nRegister(dario, rosemarie)\nMasturbate(rosemarie, dario)\nIndexless(rosemarie)\nDrilled(rosemarie)\nRegister(rosemarie, dario)\nRegister(rosemarie, davis)\nnot Masturbate(davis, dario)\nMasturbate(davis, rosemarie)\nIndexless(davis)\nOrganic(davis)\nnot Misplaced(davis)\nDrilled(davis)\nMiniate(davis, dario)\nnot Register(davis, dario)\nRegister(rosemarie, dario) and Miniate(rosemarie, dario) -> Indexless(dario)\nforall x (Masturbate(x, davis) -> Masturbate(x, rosemarie))\nforall x (Register(x, rosemarie) and Masturbate(rosemarie, davis) -> Masturbate(rosemarie, dario))\nforall x (Masturbate(x, rosemarie) and not Drilled(x) -> Miniate(x, dario))\nforall x (Register(x, davis) -> Indexless(davis))\nforall x (Miniate(x, rosemarie) -> not Masturbate(rosemarie, davis))\nforall x (Misplaced(x) -> Register(x, rosemarie))\nDrilled(dario) -> not Register(dario, rosemarie)\n\nMiniate(rosemarie, rosemarie)\n\nMiniate(rosemarie, rosemarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4676"} {"premises": "Slim is obviating. Slim is mangy. Slim is not factorial. If something is starlike and not mangy then it is sudsy. If Slim is obviating then Slim is sudsy. Slim is not factorial.", "logic": "\nObviating(slim)\nMangy(slim)\nnot Factorial(slim)\nforall x (Starlike(x) and not Mangy(x) -> Sudsy(x))\nObviating(slim) -> Sudsy(slim)\n\nnot Factorial(slim)\n\ntherefore not Factorial(slim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4176"} {"premises": "Alford is tubelike. Alford is inaudible. Alford is not wheezy. If something is pictorial and not inaudible then it is lumpish. If Alford is tubelike then Alford is lumpish. Alford is wheezy.", "logic": "\nTubelike(alford)\nInaudible(alford)\nnot Wheezy(alford)\nforall x (Pictorial(x) and not Inaudible(x) -> Lumpish(x))\nTubelike(alford) -> Lumpish(alford)\n\nWheezy(alford)\n\ntherefore not Wheezy(alford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4176"} {"premises": "Hyacinthe is andalusian. Hyacinthe is lost. Hyacinthe is not disparate. If something is smiling and not lost then it is smug. If Hyacinthe is andalusian then Hyacinthe is smug. Hyacinthe is not furry.", "logic": "\nAndalusian(hyacinthe)\nLost(hyacinthe)\nnot Disparate(hyacinthe)\nforall x (Smiling(x) and not Lost(x) -> Smug(x))\nAndalusian(hyacinthe) -> Smug(hyacinthe)\n\nnot Furry(hyacinthe)\n\nnot Furry(hyacinthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4176"} {"premises": "Saunder is gladsome. Saunder is implike. Saunder is not allelic. If something is mature and not implike then it is zymolytic. If Saunder is gladsome then Saunder is zymolytic. Saunder is mature.", "logic": "\nGladsome(saunder)\nImplike(saunder)\nnot Allelic(saunder)\nforall x (Mature(x) and not Implike(x) -> Zymolytic(x))\nGladsome(saunder) -> Zymolytic(saunder)\n\nMature(saunder)\n\nMature(saunder) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4176"} {"premises": "Shanie is totemic. Hanni is eminent. Jilleen is eminent. If something is eminent and episcopal then it is liberal. Young, eminent things are bronzy. If Shanie is liberal and Shanie is bronzy then Shanie is timbered. If Jilleen is interred and Jilleen is timbered then Jilleen is totemic. If something is timbered then it is liberal. All totemic, bronzy things are interred. All totemic things are timbered. If something is timbered and totemic then it is liberal. Shanie is totemic.", "logic": "\nTotemic(shanie)\nEminent(hanni)\nEminent(jilleen)\nforall x (Eminent(x) and Episcopal(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Timbered(x) and Eminent(x) -> Bronzy(x))\nLiberal(shanie) and Bronzy(shanie) -> Timbered(shanie)\nInterred(jilleen) and Timbered(jilleen) -> Totemic(jilleen)\nforall x (Timbered(x) -> Liberal(x))\nforall x (Totemic(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Interred(x))\nforall x (Totemic(x) -> Timbered(x))\nforall x (Timbered(x) and Totemic(x) -> Liberal(x))\n\nTotemic(shanie)\n\ntherefore Totemic(shanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Murphy is piggy. Lockwood is maniac. Loreen is maniac. If something is maniac and dyslectic then it is ugandan. Young, maniac things are busty. If Murphy is ugandan and Murphy is busty then Murphy is slipshod. If Loreen is early and Loreen is slipshod then Loreen is piggy. If something is slipshod then it is ugandan. All piggy, busty things are early. All piggy things are slipshod. If something is slipshod and piggy then it is ugandan. Murphy is not piggy.", "logic": "\nPiggy(murphy)\nManiac(lockwood)\nManiac(loreen)\nforall x (Maniac(x) and Dyslectic(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nforall x (Slipshod(x) and Maniac(x) -> Busty(x))\nUgandan(murphy) and Busty(murphy) -> Slipshod(murphy)\nEarly(loreen) and Slipshod(loreen) -> Piggy(loreen)\nforall x (Slipshod(x) -> Ugandan(x))\nforall x (Piggy(x) and Busty(x) -> Early(x))\nforall x (Piggy(x) -> Slipshod(x))\nforall x (Slipshod(x) and Piggy(x) -> Ugandan(x))\n\nnot Piggy(murphy)\n\ntherefore Piggy(murphy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Ania is mucinoid. Bari is unlamented. Berenice is unlamented. If something is unlamented and pleasant then it is squint. Young, unlamented things are vatical. If Ania is squint and Ania is vatical then Ania is prior. If Berenice is unheralded and Berenice is prior then Berenice is mucinoid. If something is prior then it is squint. All mucinoid, vatical things are unheralded. All mucinoid things are prior. If something is prior and mucinoid then it is squint. Ania is prior.", "logic": "\nMucinoid(ania)\nUnlamented(bari)\nUnlamented(berenice)\nforall x (Unlamented(x) and Pleasant(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Prior(x) and Unlamented(x) -> Vatical(x))\nSquint(ania) and Vatical(ania) -> Prior(ania)\nUnheralded(berenice) and Prior(berenice) -> Mucinoid(berenice)\nforall x (Prior(x) -> Squint(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) and Vatical(x) -> Unheralded(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Prior(x))\nforall x (Prior(x) and Mucinoid(x) -> Squint(x))\n\nPrior(ania)\n\nMucinoid(ania) and forall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Prior(x)) -> therefore Prior(ania)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Willey is contagious. Kayle is goddamned. Tova is goddamned. If something is goddamned and sedulous then it is tamil. Young, goddamned things are umteenth. If Willey is tamil and Willey is umteenth then Willey is handheld. If Tova is mutilated and Tova is handheld then Tova is contagious. If something is handheld then it is tamil. All contagious, umteenth things are mutilated. All contagious things are handheld. If something is handheld and contagious then it is tamil. Willey is not handheld.", "logic": "\nContagious(willey)\nGoddamned(kayle)\nGoddamned(tova)\nforall x (Goddamned(x) and Sedulous(x) -> Tamil(x))\nforall x (Handheld(x) and Goddamned(x) -> Umteenth(x))\nTamil(willey) and Umteenth(willey) -> Handheld(willey)\nMutilated(tova) and Handheld(tova) -> Contagious(tova)\nforall x (Handheld(x) -> Tamil(x))\nforall x (Contagious(x) and Umteenth(x) -> Mutilated(x))\nforall x (Contagious(x) -> Handheld(x))\nforall x (Handheld(x) and Contagious(x) -> Tamil(x))\n\nnot Handheld(willey)\n\nContagious(willey) and forall x (Contagious(x) -> Handheld(x)) -> therefore Handheld(willey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Mika is liveborn. Shanon is blind. Ignazio is blind. If something is blind and absolutist then it is worshipful. Young, blind things are bowlegged. If Mika is worshipful and Mika is bowlegged then Mika is coagulable. If Ignazio is peripheral and Ignazio is coagulable then Ignazio is liveborn. If something is coagulable then it is worshipful. All liveborn, bowlegged things are peripheral. All liveborn things are coagulable. If something is coagulable and liveborn then it is worshipful. Mika is worshipful.", "logic": "\nLiveborn(mika)\nBlind(shanon)\nBlind(ignazio)\nforall x (Blind(x) and Absolutist(x) -> Worshipful(x))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Blind(x) -> Bowlegged(x))\nWorshipful(mika) and Bowlegged(mika) -> Coagulable(mika)\nPeripheral(ignazio) and Coagulable(ignazio) -> Liveborn(ignazio)\nforall x (Coagulable(x) -> Worshipful(x))\nforall x (Liveborn(x) and Bowlegged(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nforall x (Liveborn(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and Liveborn(x) -> Worshipful(x))\n\nWorshipful(mika)\n\nLiveborn(mika) and forall x (Liveborn(x) -> Coagulable(x)) -> therefore Coagulable(mika) Coagulable(mika) and forall x (Coagulable(x) -> Worshipful(x)) -> therefore Worshipful(mika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Hank is ceramic. Vance is allocable. Shelby is allocable. If something is allocable and frothy then it is nauseated. Young, allocable things are pliant. If Hank is nauseated and Hank is pliant then Hank is bonzer. If Shelby is nonaged and Shelby is bonzer then Shelby is ceramic. If something is bonzer then it is nauseated. All ceramic, pliant things are nonaged. All ceramic things are bonzer. If something is bonzer and ceramic then it is nauseated. Hank is not nauseated.", "logic": "\nCeramic(hank)\nAllocable(vance)\nAllocable(shelby)\nforall x (Allocable(x) and Frothy(x) -> Nauseated(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) and Allocable(x) -> Pliant(x))\nNauseated(hank) and Pliant(hank) -> Bonzer(hank)\nNonaged(shelby) and Bonzer(shelby) -> Ceramic(shelby)\nforall x (Bonzer(x) -> Nauseated(x))\nforall x (Ceramic(x) and Pliant(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Ceramic(x) -> Bonzer(x))\nforall x (Bonzer(x) and Ceramic(x) -> Nauseated(x))\n\nnot Nauseated(hank)\n\nCeramic(hank) and forall x (Ceramic(x) -> Bonzer(x)) -> therefore Bonzer(hank) Bonzer(hank) and forall x (Bonzer(x) -> Nauseated(x)) -> therefore Nauseated(hank)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Angy is angry. Ingmar is smothered. Emiline is smothered. If something is smothered and unspent then it is inhumane. Young, smothered things are protecting. If Angy is inhumane and Angy is protecting then Angy is turkmen. If Emiline is unbendable and Emiline is turkmen then Emiline is angry. If something is turkmen then it is inhumane. All angry, protecting things are unbendable. All angry things are turkmen. If something is turkmen and angry then it is inhumane. Emiline is not protecting.", "logic": "\nAngry(angy)\nSmothered(ingmar)\nSmothered(emiline)\nforall x (Smothered(x) and Unspent(x) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Turkmen(x) and Smothered(x) -> Protecting(x))\nInhumane(angy) and Protecting(angy) -> Turkmen(angy)\nUnbendable(emiline) and Turkmen(emiline) -> Angry(emiline)\nforall x (Turkmen(x) -> Inhumane(x))\nforall x (Angry(x) and Protecting(x) -> Unbendable(x))\nforall x (Angry(x) -> Turkmen(x))\nforall x (Turkmen(x) and Angry(x) -> Inhumane(x))\n\nnot Protecting(emiline)\n\nforall x (Turkmen(x) and Smothered(x) -> Protecting(x)) <- forall x (Angry(x) -> Turkmen(x)) <- Unbendable(emiline) and Turkmen(emiline) -> Angry(emiline) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Quiggly is romany. Guido is botryoidal. Shir is botryoidal. If something is botryoidal and expansile then it is decisive. Young, botryoidal things are cytotoxic. If Quiggly is decisive and Quiggly is cytotoxic then Quiggly is copesetic. If Shir is severe and Shir is copesetic then Shir is romany. If something is copesetic then it is decisive. All romany, cytotoxic things are severe. All romany things are copesetic. If something is copesetic and romany then it is decisive. Quiggly is cytotoxic.", "logic": "\nRomany(quiggly)\nBotryoidal(guido)\nBotryoidal(shir)\nforall x (Botryoidal(x) and Expansile(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and Botryoidal(x) -> Cytotoxic(x))\nDecisive(quiggly) and Cytotoxic(quiggly) -> Copesetic(quiggly)\nSevere(shir) and Copesetic(shir) -> Romany(shir)\nforall x (Copesetic(x) -> Decisive(x))\nforall x (Romany(x) and Cytotoxic(x) -> Severe(x))\nforall x (Romany(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and Romany(x) -> Decisive(x))\n\nCytotoxic(quiggly)\n\nforall x (Copesetic(x) and Botryoidal(x) -> Cytotoxic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Julio is synonymous. Carlita is ethnic. Anabella is ethnic. If something is ethnic and algonkian then it is norwegian. Young, ethnic things are strung. If Julio is norwegian and Julio is strung then Julio is moneyed. If Anabella is uncommon and Anabella is moneyed then Anabella is synonymous. If something is moneyed then it is norwegian. All synonymous, strung things are uncommon. All synonymous things are moneyed. If something is moneyed and synonymous then it is norwegian. Carlita is not norwegian.", "logic": "\nSynonymous(julio)\nEthnic(carlita)\nEthnic(anabella)\nforall x (Ethnic(x) and Algonkian(x) -> Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Moneyed(x) and Ethnic(x) -> Strung(x))\nNorwegian(julio) and Strung(julio) -> Moneyed(julio)\nUncommon(anabella) and Moneyed(anabella) -> Synonymous(anabella)\nforall x (Moneyed(x) -> Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) and Strung(x) -> Uncommon(x))\nforall x (Synonymous(x) -> Moneyed(x))\nforall x (Moneyed(x) and Synonymous(x) -> Norwegian(x))\n\nnot Norwegian(carlita)\n\nforall x (Moneyed(x) -> Norwegian(x)) <- forall x (Synonymous(x) -> Moneyed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Zeb is cuspidal. Gilbert is piscine. Franny is piscine. If something is piscine and delineate then it is inexact. Young, piscine things are braky. If Zeb is inexact and Zeb is braky then Zeb is trusting. If Franny is uncrannied and Franny is trusting then Franny is cuspidal. If something is trusting then it is inexact. All cuspidal, braky things are uncrannied. All cuspidal things are trusting. If something is trusting and cuspidal then it is inexact. Zeb is delineate.", "logic": "\nCuspidal(zeb)\nPiscine(gilbert)\nPiscine(franny)\nforall x (Piscine(x) and Delineate(x) -> Inexact(x))\nforall x (Trusting(x) and Piscine(x) -> Braky(x))\nInexact(zeb) and Braky(zeb) -> Trusting(zeb)\nUncrannied(franny) and Trusting(franny) -> Cuspidal(franny)\nforall x (Trusting(x) -> Inexact(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Braky(x) -> Uncrannied(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) -> Trusting(x))\nforall x (Trusting(x) and Cuspidal(x) -> Inexact(x))\n\nDelineate(zeb)\n\nDelineate(zeb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Mirna is orderly. Winifield is wizardly. Hari is wizardly. If something is wizardly and lifeless then it is flattened. Young, wizardly things are furious. If Mirna is flattened and Mirna is furious then Mirna is affable. If Hari is moonlit and Hari is affable then Hari is orderly. If something is affable then it is flattened. All orderly, furious things are moonlit. All orderly things are affable. If something is affable and orderly then it is flattened. Mirna is not wizardly.", "logic": "\nOrderly(mirna)\nWizardly(winifield)\nWizardly(hari)\nforall x (Wizardly(x) and Lifeless(x) -> Flattened(x))\nforall x (Affable(x) and Wizardly(x) -> Furious(x))\nFlattened(mirna) and Furious(mirna) -> Affable(mirna)\nMoonlit(hari) and Affable(hari) -> Orderly(hari)\nforall x (Affable(x) -> Flattened(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) and Furious(x) -> Moonlit(x))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Affable(x))\nforall x (Affable(x) and Orderly(x) -> Flattened(x))\n\nnot Wizardly(mirna)\n\nnot Wizardly(mirna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Gizela is breeched. Patric is mushy. Parnell is mushy. If something is mushy and vixenish then it is warring. Young, mushy things are wysiwyg. If Gizela is warring and Gizela is wysiwyg then Gizela is sulfuric. If Parnell is excusatory and Parnell is sulfuric then Parnell is breeched. If something is sulfuric then it is warring. All breeched, wysiwyg things are excusatory. All breeched things are sulfuric. If something is sulfuric and breeched then it is warring. Parnell is vixenish.", "logic": "\nBreeched(gizela)\nMushy(patric)\nMushy(parnell)\nforall x (Mushy(x) and Vixenish(x) -> Warring(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) and Mushy(x) -> Wysiwyg(x))\nWarring(gizela) and Wysiwyg(gizela) -> Sulfuric(gizela)\nExcusatory(parnell) and Sulfuric(parnell) -> Breeched(parnell)\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) -> Warring(x))\nforall x (Breeched(x) and Wysiwyg(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Breeched(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\nforall x (Sulfuric(x) and Breeched(x) -> Warring(x))\n\nVixenish(parnell)\n\nVixenish(parnell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-862"} {"premises": "Janey is plumbable. Janey is spiffy. Aurel is unspaced. Aurel is soignee. Aurel is lobular. Aurel is dished. Aurel is spiffy. Fonsie is unspaced. Fonsie is soignee. Fonsie is plumbable. Fonsie is satanic. Fonsie is lobular. Maynord is soignee. Maynord is plumbable. Maynord is satanic. Maynord is dished. All soignee people are dished. If someone is dished then they are lobular. All dished people are lobular. Fonsie is unspaced.", "logic": "\nPlumbable(janey)\nSpiffy(janey)\nUnspaced(aurel)\nSoignee(aurel)\nLobular(aurel)\nDished(aurel)\nSpiffy(aurel)\nUnspaced(fonsie)\nSoignee(fonsie)\nPlumbable(fonsie)\nSatanic(fonsie)\nLobular(fonsie)\nSoignee(maynord)\nPlumbable(maynord)\nSatanic(maynord)\nDished(maynord)\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Lobular(x))\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Lobular(x))\n\nUnspaced(fonsie)\n\ntherefore Unspaced(fonsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5101"} {"premises": "Ethelyn is unrepaired. Ethelyn is wobbly. Cornelia is grim. Cornelia is beetle. Cornelia is probable. Cornelia is blistery. Cornelia is wobbly. Wilburn is grim. Wilburn is beetle. Wilburn is unrepaired. Wilburn is delineate. Wilburn is probable. Torrence is beetle. Torrence is unrepaired. Torrence is delineate. Torrence is blistery. All beetle people are blistery. If someone is blistery then they are probable. All blistery people are probable. Ethelyn is not wobbly.", "logic": "\nUnrepaired(ethelyn)\nWobbly(ethelyn)\nGrim(cornelia)\nBeetle(cornelia)\nProbable(cornelia)\nBlistery(cornelia)\nWobbly(cornelia)\nGrim(wilburn)\nBeetle(wilburn)\nUnrepaired(wilburn)\nDelineate(wilburn)\nProbable(wilburn)\nBeetle(torrence)\nUnrepaired(torrence)\nDelineate(torrence)\nBlistery(torrence)\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Blistery(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Probable(x))\nforall x (Blistery(x) -> Probable(x))\n\nnot Wobbly(ethelyn)\n\ntherefore Wobbly(ethelyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5101"} {"premises": "Nessi is saclike. Nessi is huxleyan. Edyth is finished. Edyth is candescent. Edyth is scanty. Edyth is achromatic. Edyth is huxleyan. Neall is finished. Neall is candescent. Neall is saclike. Neall is jamaican. Neall is scanty. Letta is candescent. Letta is saclike. Letta is jamaican. Letta is achromatic. All candescent people are achromatic. If someone is achromatic then they are scanty. All achromatic people are scanty. Nessi is not scanty.", "logic": "\nSaclike(nessi)\nHuxleyan(nessi)\nFinished(edyth)\nCandescent(edyth)\nScanty(edyth)\nAchromatic(edyth)\nHuxleyan(edyth)\nFinished(neall)\nCandescent(neall)\nSaclike(neall)\nJamaican(neall)\nScanty(neall)\nCandescent(letta)\nSaclike(letta)\nJamaican(letta)\nAchromatic(letta)\nforall x (Candescent(x) -> Achromatic(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Scanty(x))\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Scanty(x))\n\nnot Scanty(nessi)\n\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Scanty(x)) <- forall x (Candescent(x) -> Achromatic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5101"} {"premises": "Keil is reserved. Keil is candied. Carlisle is venetian. Carlisle is historied. Carlisle is norwegian. Carlisle is acidic. Carlisle is candied. Cally is venetian. Cally is historied. Cally is reserved. Cally is immovable. Cally is norwegian. Chloris is historied. Chloris is reserved. Chloris is immovable. Chloris is acidic. All historied people are acidic. If someone is acidic then they are norwegian. All acidic people are norwegian. Carlisle is immovable.", "logic": "\nReserved(keil)\nCandied(keil)\nVenetian(carlisle)\nHistoried(carlisle)\nNorwegian(carlisle)\nAcidic(carlisle)\nCandied(carlisle)\nVenetian(cally)\nHistoried(cally)\nReserved(cally)\nImmovable(cally)\nNorwegian(cally)\nHistoried(chloris)\nReserved(chloris)\nImmovable(chloris)\nAcidic(chloris)\nforall x (Historied(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Norwegian(x))\n\nImmovable(carlisle)\n\nImmovable(carlisle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5101"} {"premises": "Nadya is cadastral. Nadya is severable. Nadya is terrific. Agathe is not algebraic. Agathe is invisible. Joanna is algebraic. Joanna is invisible. All terrific, algebraic people are severable. If someone is chemical and not cadastral then they are terrific. If someone is unhearable then they are algebraic. Nadya is severable.", "logic": "\nCadastral(nadya)\nSeverable(nadya)\nTerrific(nadya)\nnot Algebraic(agathe)\nInvisible(agathe)\nAlgebraic(joanna)\nInvisible(joanna)\nforall x (Terrific(x) and Algebraic(x) -> Severable(x))\nforall x (Chemical(x) and not Cadastral(x) -> Terrific(x))\nforall x (Unhearable(x) -> Algebraic(x))\n\nSeverable(nadya)\n\ntherefore Severable(nadya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4744"} {"premises": "Carina is binaural. Carina is immature. Carina is ramous. Matthieu is not uncial. Matthieu is levantine. Julio is uncial. Julio is levantine. All ramous, uncial people are immature. If someone is overstrung and not binaural then they are ramous. If someone is asserted then they are uncial. Julio is not uncial.", "logic": "\nBinaural(carina)\nImmature(carina)\nRamous(carina)\nnot Uncial(matthieu)\nLevantine(matthieu)\nUncial(julio)\nLevantine(julio)\nforall x (Ramous(x) and Uncial(x) -> Immature(x))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) and not Binaural(x) -> Ramous(x))\nforall x (Asserted(x) -> Uncial(x))\n\nnot Uncial(julio)\n\ntherefore Uncial(julio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4744"} {"premises": "Pansie is schmaltzy. Pansie is stemmed. Pansie is perineal. Nicki is not proximate. Nicki is charged. Witty is proximate. Witty is charged. All perineal, proximate people are stemmed. If someone is strained and not schmaltzy then they are perineal. If someone is toothlike then they are proximate. Pansie is not proximate.", "logic": "\nSchmaltzy(pansie)\nStemmed(pansie)\nPerineal(pansie)\nnot Proximate(nicki)\nCharged(nicki)\nProximate(witty)\nCharged(witty)\nforall x (Perineal(x) and Proximate(x) -> Stemmed(x))\nforall x (Strained(x) and not Schmaltzy(x) -> Perineal(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Proximate(x))\n\nnot Proximate(pansie)\n\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Proximate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4744"} {"premises": "Amalea is swingy. Amalea is mosstone. Amalea is surficial. Webster is not rushlike. Webster is unlikeable. Kat is rushlike. Kat is unlikeable. All surficial, rushlike people are mosstone. If someone is sepulchral and not swingy then they are surficial. If someone is patronized then they are rushlike. Webster is patronized.", "logic": "\nSwingy(amalea)\nMosstone(amalea)\nSurficial(amalea)\nnot Rushlike(webster)\nUnlikeable(webster)\nRushlike(kat)\nUnlikeable(kat)\nforall x (Surficial(x) and Rushlike(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Sepulchral(x) and not Swingy(x) -> Surficial(x))\nforall x (Patronized(x) -> Rushlike(x))\n\nPatronized(webster)\n\nPatronized(webster) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4744"} {"premises": "The grethel commute the lurlene. The grethel commute the costa. The grethel commute the shem. The grethel tunnel the shem. The lurlene is graceless. The lurlene does not see the grethel. The lurlene whop the shem. The costa commute the lurlene. The costa commute the shem. The costa does not visit the shem. The shem commute the grethel. The shem does not chase the lurlene. If the lurlene is dished then the lurlene does not see the grethel. If something tunnel the shem then the shem is flowering. If something whop the shem and the shem commute the grethel then the shem does not see the lurlene. If something is flowering then it tunnel the grethel. If something whop the lurlene then the lurlene does not visit the grethel. If something is flowering then it whop the grethel. If something is flowering then it whop the lurlene. If something tunnel the lurlene and it is not unspotted then it is not cantabile. The grethel commute the shem.", "logic": "\nCommute(grethel, lurlene)\nCommute(grethel, costa)\nCommute(grethel, shem)\nTunnel(grethel, shem)\nGraceless(lurlene)\nnot Tunnel(lurlene, grethel)\nWhop(lurlene, shem)\nCommute(costa, lurlene)\nCommute(costa, shem)\nnot Whop(costa, shem)\nCommute(shem, grethel)\nnot Commute(shem, lurlene)\nDished(lurlene) -> not Tunnel(lurlene, grethel)\nforall x (Tunnel(x, shem) -> Flowering(shem))\nforall x (Whop(x, shem) and Commute(shem, grethel) -> not Tunnel(shem, lurlene))\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Tunnel(x, grethel))\nforall x (Whop(x, lurlene) -> not Whop(lurlene, grethel))\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Whop(x, grethel))\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Whop(x, lurlene))\nforall x (Tunnel(x, lurlene) and not Unspotted(x) -> not Cantabile(x))\n\nCommute(grethel, shem)\n\ntherefore Commute(grethel, shem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The scotty sober the augie. The scotty sober the boniface. The scotty sober the pier. The scotty overhaul the pier. The augie is belittled. The augie does not see the scotty. The augie soil the pier. The boniface sober the augie. The boniface sober the pier. The boniface does not visit the pier. The pier sober the scotty. The pier does not chase the augie. If the augie is prenatal then the augie does not see the scotty. If something overhaul the pier then the pier is uncultured. If something soil the pier and the pier sober the scotty then the pier does not see the augie. If something is uncultured then it overhaul the scotty. If something soil the augie then the augie does not visit the scotty. If something is uncultured then it soil the scotty. If something is uncultured then it soil the augie. If something overhaul the augie and it is not metalloid then it is not yeastlike. The augie does not visit the pier.", "logic": "\nSober(scotty, augie)\nSober(scotty, boniface)\nSober(scotty, pier)\nOverhaul(scotty, pier)\nBelittled(augie)\nnot Overhaul(augie, scotty)\nSoil(augie, pier)\nSober(boniface, augie)\nSober(boniface, pier)\nnot Soil(boniface, pier)\nSober(pier, scotty)\nnot Sober(pier, augie)\nPrenatal(augie) -> not Overhaul(augie, scotty)\nforall x (Overhaul(x, pier) -> Uncultured(pier))\nforall x (Soil(x, pier) and Sober(pier, scotty) -> not Overhaul(pier, augie))\nforall x (Uncultured(x) -> Overhaul(x, scotty))\nforall x (Soil(x, augie) -> not Soil(augie, scotty))\nforall x (Uncultured(x) -> Soil(x, scotty))\nforall x (Uncultured(x) -> Soil(x, augie))\nforall x (Overhaul(x, augie) and not Metalloid(x) -> not Yeastlike(x))\n\nnot Soil(augie, pier)\n\ntherefore Soil(augie, pier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The madelaine readapt the selinda. The madelaine readapt the oscar. The madelaine readapt the rosemarie. The madelaine idealize the rosemarie. The selinda is cyclical. The selinda does not see the madelaine. The selinda humanize the rosemarie. The oscar readapt the selinda. The oscar readapt the rosemarie. The oscar does not visit the rosemarie. The rosemarie readapt the madelaine. The rosemarie does not chase the selinda. If the selinda is harmonised then the selinda does not see the madelaine. If something idealize the rosemarie then the rosemarie is dilatory. If something humanize the rosemarie and the rosemarie readapt the madelaine then the rosemarie does not see the selinda. If something is dilatory then it idealize the madelaine. If something humanize the selinda then the selinda does not visit the madelaine. If something is dilatory then it humanize the madelaine. If something is dilatory then it humanize the selinda. If something idealize the selinda and it is not overpriced then it is not superable. The rosemarie is dilatory.", "logic": "\nReadapt(madelaine, selinda)\nReadapt(madelaine, oscar)\nReadapt(madelaine, rosemarie)\nIdealize(madelaine, rosemarie)\nCyclical(selinda)\nnot Idealize(selinda, madelaine)\nHumanize(selinda, rosemarie)\nReadapt(oscar, selinda)\nReadapt(oscar, rosemarie)\nnot Humanize(oscar, rosemarie)\nReadapt(rosemarie, madelaine)\nnot Readapt(rosemarie, selinda)\nHarmonised(selinda) -> not Idealize(selinda, madelaine)\nforall x (Idealize(x, rosemarie) -> Dilatory(rosemarie))\nforall x (Humanize(x, rosemarie) and Readapt(rosemarie, madelaine) -> not Idealize(rosemarie, selinda))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) -> Idealize(x, madelaine))\nforall x (Humanize(x, selinda) -> not Humanize(selinda, madelaine))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) -> Humanize(x, madelaine))\nforall x (Dilatory(x) -> Humanize(x, selinda))\nforall x (Idealize(x, selinda) and not Overpriced(x) -> not Superable(x))\n\nDilatory(rosemarie)\n\nIdealize(madelaine, rosemarie) and forall x (Idealize(x, rosemarie) -> Dilatory(rosemarie)) -> therefore Dilatory(rosemarie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The erena resuspend the broderick. The erena resuspend the henrik. The erena resuspend the peyter. The erena rain the peyter. The broderick is curtained. The broderick does not see the erena. The broderick geminate the peyter. The henrik resuspend the broderick. The henrik resuspend the peyter. The henrik does not visit the peyter. The peyter resuspend the erena. The peyter does not chase the broderick. If the broderick is darkened then the broderick does not see the erena. If something rain the peyter then the peyter is mislabeled. If something geminate the peyter and the peyter resuspend the erena then the peyter does not see the broderick. If something is mislabeled then it rain the erena. If something geminate the broderick then the broderick does not visit the erena. If something is mislabeled then it geminate the erena. If something is mislabeled then it geminate the broderick. If something rain the broderick and it is not lxvii then it is not tailed. The peyter is not mislabeled.", "logic": "\nResuspend(erena, broderick)\nResuspend(erena, henrik)\nResuspend(erena, peyter)\nRain(erena, peyter)\nCurtained(broderick)\nnot Rain(broderick, erena)\nGeminate(broderick, peyter)\nResuspend(henrik, broderick)\nResuspend(henrik, peyter)\nnot Geminate(henrik, peyter)\nResuspend(peyter, erena)\nnot Resuspend(peyter, broderick)\nDarkened(broderick) -> not Rain(broderick, erena)\nforall x (Rain(x, peyter) -> Mislabeled(peyter))\nforall x (Geminate(x, peyter) and Resuspend(peyter, erena) -> not Rain(peyter, broderick))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Rain(x, erena))\nforall x (Geminate(x, broderick) -> not Geminate(broderick, erena))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Geminate(x, erena))\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Geminate(x, broderick))\nforall x (Rain(x, broderick) and not Lxvii(x) -> not Tailed(x))\n\nnot Mislabeled(peyter)\n\nRain(erena, peyter) and forall x (Rain(x, peyter) -> Mislabeled(peyter)) -> therefore Mislabeled(peyter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The merline ebonise the erasmus. The merline ebonise the leopold. The merline ebonise the loralyn. The merline nail the loralyn. The erasmus is hortative. The erasmus does not see the merline. The erasmus yank the loralyn. The leopold ebonise the erasmus. The leopold ebonise the loralyn. The leopold does not visit the loralyn. The loralyn ebonise the merline. The loralyn does not chase the erasmus. If the erasmus is nonspatial then the erasmus does not see the merline. If something nail the loralyn then the loralyn is asleep. If something yank the loralyn and the loralyn ebonise the merline then the loralyn does not see the erasmus. If something is asleep then it nail the merline. If something yank the erasmus then the erasmus does not visit the merline. If something is asleep then it yank the merline. If something is asleep then it yank the erasmus. If something nail the erasmus and it is not ovular then it is not subliminal. The loralyn yank the erasmus.", "logic": "\nEbonise(merline, erasmus)\nEbonise(merline, leopold)\nEbonise(merline, loralyn)\nNail(merline, loralyn)\nHortative(erasmus)\nnot Nail(erasmus, merline)\nYank(erasmus, loralyn)\nEbonise(leopold, erasmus)\nEbonise(leopold, loralyn)\nnot Yank(leopold, loralyn)\nEbonise(loralyn, merline)\nnot Ebonise(loralyn, erasmus)\nNonspatial(erasmus) -> not Nail(erasmus, merline)\nforall x (Nail(x, loralyn) -> Asleep(loralyn))\nforall x (Yank(x, loralyn) and Ebonise(loralyn, merline) -> not Nail(loralyn, erasmus))\nforall x (Asleep(x) -> Nail(x, merline))\nforall x (Yank(x, erasmus) -> not Yank(erasmus, merline))\nforall x (Asleep(x) -> Yank(x, merline))\nforall x (Asleep(x) -> Yank(x, erasmus))\nforall x (Nail(x, erasmus) and not Ovular(x) -> not Subliminal(x))\n\nYank(loralyn, erasmus)\n\nNail(merline, loralyn) and forall x (Nail(x, loralyn) -> Asleep(loralyn)) -> therefore Asleep(loralyn) Asleep(loralyn) and forall x (Asleep(x) -> Yank(x, erasmus)) -> therefore Yank(loralyn, erasmus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The arly reprobate the arlina. The arly reprobate the kane. The arly reprobate the shanna. The arly immobilize the shanna. The arlina is blockading. The arlina does not see the arly. The arlina heliograph the shanna. The kane reprobate the arlina. The kane reprobate the shanna. The kane does not visit the shanna. The shanna reprobate the arly. The shanna does not chase the arlina. If the arlina is revenant then the arlina does not see the arly. If something immobilize the shanna then the shanna is foreboding. If something heliograph the shanna and the shanna reprobate the arly then the shanna does not see the arlina. If something is foreboding then it immobilize the arly. If something heliograph the arlina then the arlina does not visit the arly. If something is foreboding then it heliograph the arly. If something is foreboding then it heliograph the arlina. If something immobilize the arlina and it is not unfastened then it is not vermiform. The shanna does not see the arly.", "logic": "\nReprobate(arly, arlina)\nReprobate(arly, kane)\nReprobate(arly, shanna)\nImmobilize(arly, shanna)\nBlockading(arlina)\nnot Immobilize(arlina, arly)\nHeliograph(arlina, shanna)\nReprobate(kane, arlina)\nReprobate(kane, shanna)\nnot Heliograph(kane, shanna)\nReprobate(shanna, arly)\nnot Reprobate(shanna, arlina)\nRevenant(arlina) -> not Immobilize(arlina, arly)\nforall x (Immobilize(x, shanna) -> Foreboding(shanna))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, shanna) and Reprobate(shanna, arly) -> not Immobilize(shanna, arlina))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Immobilize(x, arly))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, arlina) -> not Heliograph(arlina, arly))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Heliograph(x, arly))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> Heliograph(x, arlina))\nforall x (Immobilize(x, arlina) and not Unfastened(x) -> not Vermiform(x))\n\nnot Immobilize(shanna, arly)\n\nImmobilize(arly, shanna) and forall x (Immobilize(x, shanna) -> Foreboding(shanna)) -> therefore Foreboding(shanna) Foreboding(shanna) and forall x (Foreboding(x) -> Immobilize(x, arly)) -> therefore Immobilize(shanna, arly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The neville retrovert the gershom. The neville retrovert the rickard. The neville retrovert the sherline. The neville hollo the sherline. The gershom is broadside. The gershom does not see the neville. The gershom profane the sherline. The rickard retrovert the gershom. The rickard retrovert the sherline. The rickard does not visit the sherline. The sherline retrovert the neville. The sherline does not chase the gershom. If the gershom is nidifugous then the gershom does not see the neville. If something hollo the sherline then the sherline is conserved. If something profane the sherline and the sherline retrovert the neville then the sherline does not see the gershom. If something is conserved then it hollo the neville. If something profane the gershom then the gershom does not visit the neville. If something is conserved then it profane the neville. If something is conserved then it profane the gershom. If something hollo the gershom and it is not zonal then it is not dormant. The gershom does not visit the neville.", "logic": "\nRetrovert(neville, gershom)\nRetrovert(neville, rickard)\nRetrovert(neville, sherline)\nHollo(neville, sherline)\nBroadside(gershom)\nnot Hollo(gershom, neville)\nProfane(gershom, sherline)\nRetrovert(rickard, gershom)\nRetrovert(rickard, sherline)\nnot Profane(rickard, sherline)\nRetrovert(sherline, neville)\nnot Retrovert(sherline, gershom)\nNidifugous(gershom) -> not Hollo(gershom, neville)\nforall x (Hollo(x, sherline) -> Conserved(sherline))\nforall x (Profane(x, sherline) and Retrovert(sherline, neville) -> not Hollo(sherline, gershom))\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Hollo(x, neville))\nforall x (Profane(x, gershom) -> not Profane(gershom, neville))\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Profane(x, neville))\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Profane(x, gershom))\nforall x (Hollo(x, gershom) and not Zonal(x) -> not Dormant(x))\n\nnot Profane(gershom, neville)\n\nHollo(neville, sherline) and forall x (Hollo(x, sherline) -> Conserved(sherline)) -> therefore Conserved(sherline) Conserved(sherline) and forall x (Conserved(x) -> Profane(x, gershom)) -> therefore Profane(sherline, gershom) Profane(sherline, gershom) and forall x (Profane(x, gershom) -> not Profane(gershom, neville)) -> therefore not Profane(gershom, neville)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The avis evade the rivi. The avis evade the sondra. The avis evade the jotham. The avis concern the jotham. The rivi is sororal. The rivi does not see the avis. The rivi curb the jotham. The sondra evade the rivi. The sondra evade the jotham. The sondra does not visit the jotham. The jotham evade the avis. The jotham does not chase the rivi. If the rivi is preclusive then the rivi does not see the avis. If something concern the jotham then the jotham is shrill. If something curb the jotham and the jotham evade the avis then the jotham does not see the rivi. If something is shrill then it concern the avis. If something curb the rivi then the rivi does not visit the avis. If something is shrill then it curb the avis. If something is shrill then it curb the rivi. If something concern the rivi and it is not priggish then it is not ludicrous. The rivi curb the avis.", "logic": "\nEvade(avis, rivi)\nEvade(avis, sondra)\nEvade(avis, jotham)\nConcern(avis, jotham)\nSororal(rivi)\nnot Concern(rivi, avis)\nCurb(rivi, jotham)\nEvade(sondra, rivi)\nEvade(sondra, jotham)\nnot Curb(sondra, jotham)\nEvade(jotham, avis)\nnot Evade(jotham, rivi)\nPreclusive(rivi) -> not Concern(rivi, avis)\nforall x (Concern(x, jotham) -> Shrill(jotham))\nforall x (Curb(x, jotham) and Evade(jotham, avis) -> not Concern(jotham, rivi))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Concern(x, avis))\nforall x (Curb(x, rivi) -> not Curb(rivi, avis))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Curb(x, avis))\nforall x (Shrill(x) -> Curb(x, rivi))\nforall x (Concern(x, rivi) and not Priggish(x) -> not Ludicrous(x))\n\nCurb(rivi, avis)\n\nConcern(avis, jotham) and forall x (Concern(x, jotham) -> Shrill(jotham)) -> therefore Shrill(jotham) Shrill(jotham) and forall x (Shrill(x) -> Curb(x, rivi)) -> therefore Curb(jotham, rivi) Curb(jotham, rivi) and forall x (Curb(x, rivi) -> not Curb(rivi, avis)) -> therefore not Curb(rivi, avis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The georgiana recombine the leonerd. The georgiana recombine the sarah. The georgiana recombine the rosaleen. The georgiana bowdlerize the rosaleen. The leonerd is fortified. The leonerd does not see the georgiana. The leonerd sensitise the rosaleen. The sarah recombine the leonerd. The sarah recombine the rosaleen. The sarah does not visit the rosaleen. The rosaleen recombine the georgiana. The rosaleen does not chase the leonerd. If the leonerd is shipboard then the leonerd does not see the georgiana. If something bowdlerize the rosaleen then the rosaleen is grungy. If something sensitise the rosaleen and the rosaleen recombine the georgiana then the rosaleen does not see the leonerd. If something is grungy then it bowdlerize the georgiana. If something sensitise the leonerd then the leonerd does not visit the georgiana. If something is grungy then it sensitise the georgiana. If something is grungy then it sensitise the leonerd. If something bowdlerize the leonerd and it is not sanative then it is not euclidian. The georgiana does not see the georgiana.", "logic": "\nRecombine(georgiana, leonerd)\nRecombine(georgiana, sarah)\nRecombine(georgiana, rosaleen)\nBowdlerize(georgiana, rosaleen)\nFortified(leonerd)\nnot Bowdlerize(leonerd, georgiana)\nSensitise(leonerd, rosaleen)\nRecombine(sarah, leonerd)\nRecombine(sarah, rosaleen)\nnot Sensitise(sarah, rosaleen)\nRecombine(rosaleen, georgiana)\nnot Recombine(rosaleen, leonerd)\nShipboard(leonerd) -> not Bowdlerize(leonerd, georgiana)\nforall x (Bowdlerize(x, rosaleen) -> Grungy(rosaleen))\nforall x (Sensitise(x, rosaleen) and Recombine(rosaleen, georgiana) -> not Bowdlerize(rosaleen, leonerd))\nforall x (Grungy(x) -> Bowdlerize(x, georgiana))\nforall x (Sensitise(x, leonerd) -> not Sensitise(leonerd, georgiana))\nforall x (Grungy(x) -> Sensitise(x, georgiana))\nforall x (Grungy(x) -> Sensitise(x, leonerd))\nforall x (Bowdlerize(x, leonerd) and not Sanative(x) -> not Euclidian(x))\n\nnot Bowdlerize(georgiana, georgiana)\n\nforall x (Grungy(x) -> Bowdlerize(x, georgiana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The nina burr the milo. The nina burr the arielle. The nina burr the dean. The nina hound the dean. The milo is postictal. The milo does not see the nina. The milo hole the dean. The arielle burr the milo. The arielle burr the dean. The arielle does not visit the dean. The dean burr the nina. The dean does not chase the milo. If the milo is unawed then the milo does not see the nina. If something hound the dean then the dean is fingerless. If something hole the dean and the dean burr the nina then the dean does not see the milo. If something is fingerless then it hound the nina. If something hole the milo then the milo does not visit the nina. If something is fingerless then it hole the nina. If something is fingerless then it hole the milo. If something hound the milo and it is not written then it is not strep. The nina hole the milo.", "logic": "\nBurr(nina, milo)\nBurr(nina, arielle)\nBurr(nina, dean)\nHound(nina, dean)\nPostictal(milo)\nnot Hound(milo, nina)\nHole(milo, dean)\nBurr(arielle, milo)\nBurr(arielle, dean)\nnot Hole(arielle, dean)\nBurr(dean, nina)\nnot Burr(dean, milo)\nUnawed(milo) -> not Hound(milo, nina)\nforall x (Hound(x, dean) -> Fingerless(dean))\nforall x (Hole(x, dean) and Burr(dean, nina) -> not Hound(dean, milo))\nforall x (Fingerless(x) -> Hound(x, nina))\nforall x (Hole(x, milo) -> not Hole(milo, nina))\nforall x (Fingerless(x) -> Hole(x, nina))\nforall x (Fingerless(x) -> Hole(x, milo))\nforall x (Hound(x, milo) and not Written(x) -> not Strep(x))\n\nHole(nina, milo)\n\nforall x (Fingerless(x) -> Hole(x, milo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The idalia rear the kendal. The idalia rear the ravi. The idalia rear the tyler. The idalia acquiesce the tyler. The kendal is unmourned. The kendal does not see the idalia. The kendal defervesce the tyler. The ravi rear the kendal. The ravi rear the tyler. The ravi does not visit the tyler. The tyler rear the idalia. The tyler does not chase the kendal. If the kendal is scummy then the kendal does not see the idalia. If something acquiesce the tyler then the tyler is ceaseless. If something defervesce the tyler and the tyler rear the idalia then the tyler does not see the kendal. If something is ceaseless then it acquiesce the idalia. If something defervesce the kendal then the kendal does not visit the idalia. If something is ceaseless then it defervesce the idalia. If something is ceaseless then it defervesce the kendal. If something acquiesce the kendal and it is not inimitable then it is not selfsame. The kendal does not visit the kendal.", "logic": "\nRear(idalia, kendal)\nRear(idalia, ravi)\nRear(idalia, tyler)\nAcquiesce(idalia, tyler)\nUnmourned(kendal)\nnot Acquiesce(kendal, idalia)\nDefervesce(kendal, tyler)\nRear(ravi, kendal)\nRear(ravi, tyler)\nnot Defervesce(ravi, tyler)\nRear(tyler, idalia)\nnot Rear(tyler, kendal)\nScummy(kendal) -> not Acquiesce(kendal, idalia)\nforall x (Acquiesce(x, tyler) -> Ceaseless(tyler))\nforall x (Defervesce(x, tyler) and Rear(tyler, idalia) -> not Acquiesce(tyler, kendal))\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) -> Acquiesce(x, idalia))\nforall x (Defervesce(x, kendal) -> not Defervesce(kendal, idalia))\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) -> Defervesce(x, idalia))\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) -> Defervesce(x, kendal))\nforall x (Acquiesce(x, kendal) and not Inimitable(x) -> not Selfsame(x))\n\nnot Defervesce(kendal, kendal)\n\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) -> Defervesce(x, kendal)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The ernesta wangle the isidora. The ernesta wangle the torrence. The ernesta wangle the ardath. The ernesta sorcerise the ardath. The isidora is equipotent. The isidora does not see the ernesta. The isidora bootstrap the ardath. The torrence wangle the isidora. The torrence wangle the ardath. The torrence does not visit the ardath. The ardath wangle the ernesta. The ardath does not chase the isidora. If the isidora is spiritless then the isidora does not see the ernesta. If something sorcerise the ardath then the ardath is homostylic. If something bootstrap the ardath and the ardath wangle the ernesta then the ardath does not see the isidora. If something is homostylic then it sorcerise the ernesta. If something bootstrap the isidora then the isidora does not visit the ernesta. If something is homostylic then it bootstrap the ernesta. If something is homostylic then it bootstrap the isidora. If something sorcerise the isidora and it is not decreased then it is not ruby. The torrence bootstrap the isidora.", "logic": "\nWangle(ernesta, isidora)\nWangle(ernesta, torrence)\nWangle(ernesta, ardath)\nSorcerise(ernesta, ardath)\nEquipotent(isidora)\nnot Sorcerise(isidora, ernesta)\nBootstrap(isidora, ardath)\nWangle(torrence, isidora)\nWangle(torrence, ardath)\nnot Bootstrap(torrence, ardath)\nWangle(ardath, ernesta)\nnot Wangle(ardath, isidora)\nSpiritless(isidora) -> not Sorcerise(isidora, ernesta)\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, ardath) -> Homostylic(ardath))\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, ardath) and Wangle(ardath, ernesta) -> not Sorcerise(ardath, isidora))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) -> Sorcerise(x, ernesta))\nforall x (Bootstrap(x, isidora) -> not Bootstrap(isidora, ernesta))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) -> Bootstrap(x, ernesta))\nforall x (Homostylic(x) -> Bootstrap(x, isidora))\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, isidora) and not Decreased(x) -> not Ruby(x))\n\nBootstrap(torrence, isidora)\n\nforall x (Homostylic(x) -> Bootstrap(x, isidora)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The nonna unhook the ilyssa. The nonna unhook the garvey. The nonna unhook the vance. The nonna blazon the vance. The ilyssa is biting. The ilyssa does not see the nonna. The ilyssa integrate the vance. The garvey unhook the ilyssa. The garvey unhook the vance. The garvey does not visit the vance. The vance unhook the nonna. The vance does not chase the ilyssa. If the ilyssa is uninjured then the ilyssa does not see the nonna. If something blazon the vance then the vance is darkened. If something integrate the vance and the vance unhook the nonna then the vance does not see the ilyssa. If something is darkened then it blazon the nonna. If something integrate the ilyssa then the ilyssa does not visit the nonna. If something is darkened then it integrate the nonna. If something is darkened then it integrate the ilyssa. If something blazon the ilyssa and it is not home then it is not ablated. The nonna is not uninjured.", "logic": "\nUnhook(nonna, ilyssa)\nUnhook(nonna, garvey)\nUnhook(nonna, vance)\nBlazon(nonna, vance)\nBiting(ilyssa)\nnot Blazon(ilyssa, nonna)\nIntegrate(ilyssa, vance)\nUnhook(garvey, ilyssa)\nUnhook(garvey, vance)\nnot Integrate(garvey, vance)\nUnhook(vance, nonna)\nnot Unhook(vance, ilyssa)\nUninjured(ilyssa) -> not Blazon(ilyssa, nonna)\nforall x (Blazon(x, vance) -> Darkened(vance))\nforall x (Integrate(x, vance) and Unhook(vance, nonna) -> not Blazon(vance, ilyssa))\nforall x (Darkened(x) -> Blazon(x, nonna))\nforall x (Integrate(x, ilyssa) -> not Integrate(ilyssa, nonna))\nforall x (Darkened(x) -> Integrate(x, nonna))\nforall x (Darkened(x) -> Integrate(x, ilyssa))\nforall x (Blazon(x, ilyssa) and not Home(x) -> not Ablated(x))\n\nnot Uninjured(nonna)\n\nnot Uninjured(nonna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The issie cage the grover. The issie cage the danni. The issie cage the layla. The issie signpost the layla. The grover is flaunty. The grover does not see the issie. The grover goad the layla. The danni cage the grover. The danni cage the layla. The danni does not visit the layla. The layla cage the issie. The layla does not chase the grover. If the grover is aureate then the grover does not see the issie. If something signpost the layla then the layla is romanic. If something goad the layla and the layla cage the issie then the layla does not see the grover. If something is romanic then it signpost the issie. If something goad the grover then the grover does not visit the issie. If something is romanic then it goad the issie. If something is romanic then it goad the grover. If something signpost the grover and it is not obliged then it is not nonsense. The issie is romanic.", "logic": "\nCage(issie, grover)\nCage(issie, danni)\nCage(issie, layla)\nSignpost(issie, layla)\nFlaunty(grover)\nnot Signpost(grover, issie)\nGoad(grover, layla)\nCage(danni, grover)\nCage(danni, layla)\nnot Goad(danni, layla)\nCage(layla, issie)\nnot Cage(layla, grover)\nAureate(grover) -> not Signpost(grover, issie)\nforall x (Signpost(x, layla) -> Romanic(layla))\nforall x (Goad(x, layla) and Cage(layla, issie) -> not Signpost(layla, grover))\nforall x (Romanic(x) -> Signpost(x, issie))\nforall x (Goad(x, grover) -> not Goad(grover, issie))\nforall x (Romanic(x) -> Goad(x, issie))\nforall x (Romanic(x) -> Goad(x, grover))\nforall x (Signpost(x, grover) and not Obliged(x) -> not Nonsense(x))\n\nRomanic(issie)\n\nRomanic(issie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The koren stall the aleta. The koren stall the dee. The koren stall the judson. The koren skid the judson. The aleta is translunar. The aleta does not see the koren. The aleta complect the judson. The dee stall the aleta. The dee stall the judson. The dee does not visit the judson. The judson stall the koren. The judson does not chase the aleta. If the aleta is littoral then the aleta does not see the koren. If something skid the judson then the judson is atlantic. If something complect the judson and the judson stall the koren then the judson does not see the aleta. If something is atlantic then it skid the koren. If something complect the aleta then the aleta does not visit the koren. If something is atlantic then it complect the koren. If something is atlantic then it complect the aleta. If something skid the aleta and it is not mormon then it is not rattled. The aleta does not visit the dee.", "logic": "\nStall(koren, aleta)\nStall(koren, dee)\nStall(koren, judson)\nSkid(koren, judson)\nTranslunar(aleta)\nnot Skid(aleta, koren)\nComplect(aleta, judson)\nStall(dee, aleta)\nStall(dee, judson)\nnot Complect(dee, judson)\nStall(judson, koren)\nnot Stall(judson, aleta)\nLittoral(aleta) -> not Skid(aleta, koren)\nforall x (Skid(x, judson) -> Atlantic(judson))\nforall x (Complect(x, judson) and Stall(judson, koren) -> not Skid(judson, aleta))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Skid(x, koren))\nforall x (Complect(x, aleta) -> not Complect(aleta, koren))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Complect(x, koren))\nforall x (Atlantic(x) -> Complect(x, aleta))\nforall x (Skid(x, aleta) and not Mormon(x) -> not Rattled(x))\n\nnot Complect(aleta, dee)\n\nnot Complect(aleta, dee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "The sharron pulse the adi. The sharron pulse the inez. The sharron pulse the trude. The sharron throttle the trude. The adi is irenic. The adi does not see the sharron. The adi compel the trude. The inez pulse the adi. The inez pulse the trude. The inez does not visit the trude. The trude pulse the sharron. The trude does not chase the adi. If the adi is both then the adi does not see the sharron. If something throttle the trude then the trude is seared. If something compel the trude and the trude pulse the sharron then the trude does not see the adi. If something is seared then it throttle the sharron. If something compel the adi then the adi does not visit the sharron. If something is seared then it compel the sharron. If something is seared then it compel the adi. If something throttle the adi and it is not shaggy then it is not pathetic. The sharron pulse the sharron.", "logic": "\nPulse(sharron, adi)\nPulse(sharron, inez)\nPulse(sharron, trude)\nThrottle(sharron, trude)\nIrenic(adi)\nnot Throttle(adi, sharron)\nCompel(adi, trude)\nPulse(inez, adi)\nPulse(inez, trude)\nnot Compel(inez, trude)\nPulse(trude, sharron)\nnot Pulse(trude, adi)\nBoth(adi) -> not Throttle(adi, sharron)\nforall x (Throttle(x, trude) -> Seared(trude))\nforall x (Compel(x, trude) and Pulse(trude, sharron) -> not Throttle(trude, adi))\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Throttle(x, sharron))\nforall x (Compel(x, adi) -> not Compel(adi, sharron))\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Compel(x, sharron))\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Compel(x, adi))\nforall x (Throttle(x, adi) and not Shaggy(x) -> not Pathetic(x))\n\nPulse(sharron, sharron)\n\nPulse(sharron, sharron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-468"} {"premises": "Pammie is not iridescent. Pammie is chaotic. Theressa is innumerous. Theressa is nipping. Frederica is vexatious. Frederica is not anarchic. Frank is vexatious. Cold, iridescent people are appalling. If someone is innumerous then they are iridescent. If someone is vexatious then they are iridescent. If Theressa is anarchic then Theressa is vexatious. If Theressa is chaotic and Theressa is not innumerous then Theressa is anarchic. All innumerous people are anarchic. Pammie is chaotic.", "logic": "\nnot Iridescent(pammie)\nChaotic(pammie)\nInnumerous(theressa)\nNipping(theressa)\nVexatious(frederica)\nnot Anarchic(frederica)\nVexatious(frank)\nforall x (Vexatious(x) and Iridescent(x) -> Appalling(x))\nforall x (Innumerous(x) -> Iridescent(x))\nforall x (Vexatious(x) -> Iridescent(x))\nAnarchic(theressa) -> Vexatious(theressa)\nChaotic(theressa) and not Innumerous(theressa) -> Anarchic(theressa)\nforall x (Innumerous(x) -> Anarchic(x))\n\nChaotic(pammie)\n\ntherefore Chaotic(pammie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Anni is not corrective. Anni is parked. Candie is soundproof. Candie is albinic. Garfield is retrograde. Garfield is not dirigible. Dorris is retrograde. Cold, corrective people are fugacious. If someone is soundproof then they are corrective. If someone is retrograde then they are corrective. If Candie is dirigible then Candie is retrograde. If Candie is parked and Candie is not soundproof then Candie is dirigible. All soundproof people are dirigible. Garfield is not retrograde.", "logic": "\nnot Corrective(anni)\nParked(anni)\nSoundproof(candie)\nAlbinic(candie)\nRetrograde(garfield)\nnot Dirigible(garfield)\nRetrograde(dorris)\nforall x (Retrograde(x) and Corrective(x) -> Fugacious(x))\nforall x (Soundproof(x) -> Corrective(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) -> Corrective(x))\nDirigible(candie) -> Retrograde(candie)\nParked(candie) and not Soundproof(candie) -> Dirigible(candie)\nforall x (Soundproof(x) -> Dirigible(x))\n\nnot Retrograde(garfield)\n\ntherefore Retrograde(garfield)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Manya is not recorded. Manya is cybernetic. Lorenzo is epiphyseal. Lorenzo is dependant. Davidson is uxorial. Davidson is not organismic. Cyrus is uxorial. Cold, recorded people are algonkian. If someone is epiphyseal then they are recorded. If someone is uxorial then they are recorded. If Lorenzo is organismic then Lorenzo is uxorial. If Lorenzo is cybernetic and Lorenzo is not epiphyseal then Lorenzo is organismic. All epiphyseal people are organismic. Lorenzo is recorded.", "logic": "\nnot Recorded(manya)\nCybernetic(manya)\nEpiphyseal(lorenzo)\nDependant(lorenzo)\nUxorial(davidson)\nnot Organismic(davidson)\nUxorial(cyrus)\nforall x (Uxorial(x) and Recorded(x) -> Algonkian(x))\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Recorded(x))\nforall x (Uxorial(x) -> Recorded(x))\nOrganismic(lorenzo) -> Uxorial(lorenzo)\nCybernetic(lorenzo) and not Epiphyseal(lorenzo) -> Organismic(lorenzo)\nforall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Organismic(x))\n\nRecorded(lorenzo)\n\nEpiphyseal(lorenzo) and forall x (Epiphyseal(x) -> Recorded(x)) -> therefore Recorded(lorenzo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Cayla is not refractory. Cayla is olivelike. Jewel is amuck. Jewel is habited. Roanne is hoofed. Roanne is not adonic. Phyllis is hoofed. Cold, refractory people are irish. If someone is amuck then they are refractory. If someone is hoofed then they are refractory. If Jewel is adonic then Jewel is hoofed. If Jewel is olivelike and Jewel is not amuck then Jewel is adonic. All amuck people are adonic. Jewel is not adonic.", "logic": "\nnot Refractory(cayla)\nOlivelike(cayla)\nAmuck(jewel)\nHabited(jewel)\nHoofed(roanne)\nnot Adonic(roanne)\nHoofed(phyllis)\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Refractory(x) -> Irish(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) -> Refractory(x))\nforall x (Hoofed(x) -> Refractory(x))\nAdonic(jewel) -> Hoofed(jewel)\nOlivelike(jewel) and not Amuck(jewel) -> Adonic(jewel)\nforall x (Amuck(x) -> Adonic(x))\n\nnot Adonic(jewel)\n\nAmuck(jewel) and forall x (Amuck(x) -> Adonic(x)) -> therefore Adonic(jewel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Ramesh is not tautologic. Ramesh is racking. Keil is annoying. Keil is beggarly. Cicely is flying. Cicely is not sclerotic. Germain is flying. Cold, tautologic people are cogitable. If someone is annoying then they are tautologic. If someone is flying then they are tautologic. If Keil is sclerotic then Keil is flying. If Keil is racking and Keil is not annoying then Keil is sclerotic. All annoying people are sclerotic. Keil is flying.", "logic": "\nnot Tautologic(ramesh)\nRacking(ramesh)\nAnnoying(keil)\nBeggarly(keil)\nFlying(cicely)\nnot Sclerotic(cicely)\nFlying(germain)\nforall x (Flying(x) and Tautologic(x) -> Cogitable(x))\nforall x (Annoying(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nSclerotic(keil) -> Flying(keil)\nRacking(keil) and not Annoying(keil) -> Sclerotic(keil)\nforall x (Annoying(x) -> Sclerotic(x))\n\nFlying(keil)\n\nAnnoying(keil) and forall x (Annoying(x) -> Sclerotic(x)) -> therefore Sclerotic(keil) Sclerotic(keil) and Sclerotic(keil) -> Flying(keil) -> therefore Flying(keil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Lauryn is not permissive. Lauryn is earthy. Darcy is editorial. Darcy is isotropic. Isobel is alphameric. Isobel is not nationwide. Durante is alphameric. Cold, permissive people are skint. If someone is editorial then they are permissive. If someone is alphameric then they are permissive. If Darcy is nationwide then Darcy is alphameric. If Darcy is earthy and Darcy is not editorial then Darcy is nationwide. All editorial people are nationwide. Durante is not skint.", "logic": "\nnot Permissive(lauryn)\nEarthy(lauryn)\nEditorial(darcy)\nIsotropic(darcy)\nAlphameric(isobel)\nnot Nationwide(isobel)\nAlphameric(durante)\nforall x (Alphameric(x) and Permissive(x) -> Skint(x))\nforall x (Editorial(x) -> Permissive(x))\nforall x (Alphameric(x) -> Permissive(x))\nNationwide(darcy) -> Alphameric(darcy)\nEarthy(darcy) and not Editorial(darcy) -> Nationwide(darcy)\nforall x (Editorial(x) -> Nationwide(x))\n\nnot Skint(durante)\n\nAlphameric(durante) and forall x (Alphameric(x) -> Permissive(x)) -> therefore Permissive(durante) Alphameric(durante) and Permissive(durante) and forall x (Alphameric(x) and Permissive(x) -> Skint(x)) -> therefore Skint(durante)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Geraldo is not jainist. Geraldo is heartfelt. Chelsie is hindermost. Chelsie is faithful. Corilla is shamanist. Corilla is not converse. Pascal is shamanist. Cold, jainist people are leaved. If someone is hindermost then they are jainist. If someone is shamanist then they are jainist. If Chelsie is converse then Chelsie is shamanist. If Chelsie is heartfelt and Chelsie is not hindermost then Chelsie is converse. All hindermost people are converse. Chelsie is leaved.", "logic": "\nnot Jainist(geraldo)\nHeartfelt(geraldo)\nHindermost(chelsie)\nFaithful(chelsie)\nShamanist(corilla)\nnot Converse(corilla)\nShamanist(pascal)\nforall x (Shamanist(x) and Jainist(x) -> Leaved(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Jainist(x))\nforall x (Shamanist(x) -> Jainist(x))\nConverse(chelsie) -> Shamanist(chelsie)\nHeartfelt(chelsie) and not Hindermost(chelsie) -> Converse(chelsie)\nforall x (Hindermost(x) -> Converse(x))\n\nLeaved(chelsie)\n\nHindermost(chelsie) and forall x (Hindermost(x) -> Converse(x)) -> therefore Converse(chelsie) Converse(chelsie) and Converse(chelsie) -> Shamanist(chelsie) -> therefore Shamanist(chelsie) Hindermost(chelsie) and forall x (Hindermost(x) -> Jainist(x)) -> therefore Jainist(chelsie) Shamanist(chelsie) and Jainist(chelsie) and forall x (Shamanist(x) and Jainist(x) -> Leaved(x)) -> therefore Leaved(chelsie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Austen is not elysian. Austen is available. Cherey is tentative. Cherey is unranked. Vanda is calendered. Vanda is not earliest. Marcelia is calendered. Cold, elysian people are grizzled. If someone is tentative then they are elysian. If someone is calendered then they are elysian. If Cherey is earliest then Cherey is calendered. If Cherey is available and Cherey is not tentative then Cherey is earliest. All tentative people are earliest. Cherey is not grizzled.", "logic": "\nnot Elysian(austen)\nAvailable(austen)\nTentative(cherey)\nUnranked(cherey)\nCalendered(vanda)\nnot Earliest(vanda)\nCalendered(marcelia)\nforall x (Calendered(x) and Elysian(x) -> Grizzled(x))\nforall x (Tentative(x) -> Elysian(x))\nforall x (Calendered(x) -> Elysian(x))\nEarliest(cherey) -> Calendered(cherey)\nAvailable(cherey) and not Tentative(cherey) -> Earliest(cherey)\nforall x (Tentative(x) -> Earliest(x))\n\nnot Grizzled(cherey)\n\nTentative(cherey) and forall x (Tentative(x) -> Earliest(x)) -> therefore Earliest(cherey) Earliest(cherey) and Earliest(cherey) -> Calendered(cherey) -> therefore Calendered(cherey) Tentative(cherey) and forall x (Tentative(x) -> Elysian(x)) -> therefore Elysian(cherey) Calendered(cherey) and Elysian(cherey) and forall x (Calendered(x) and Elysian(x) -> Grizzled(x)) -> therefore Grizzled(cherey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Salvidor is not systemic. Salvidor is fore. Melita is nervous. Melita is lucent. Mischa is pacific. Mischa is not deadening. Jenda is pacific. Cold, systemic people are patterned. If someone is nervous then they are systemic. If someone is pacific then they are systemic. If Melita is deadening then Melita is pacific. If Melita is fore and Melita is not nervous then Melita is deadening. All nervous people are deadening. Salvidor is not patterned.", "logic": "\nnot Systemic(salvidor)\nFore(salvidor)\nNervous(melita)\nLucent(melita)\nPacific(mischa)\nnot Deadening(mischa)\nPacific(jenda)\nforall x (Pacific(x) and Systemic(x) -> Patterned(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) -> Systemic(x))\nforall x (Pacific(x) -> Systemic(x))\nDeadening(melita) -> Pacific(melita)\nFore(melita) and not Nervous(melita) -> Deadening(melita)\nforall x (Nervous(x) -> Deadening(x))\n\nnot Patterned(salvidor)\n\nforall x (Pacific(x) and Systemic(x) -> Patterned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Annabelle is not bifid. Annabelle is pessimum. Erma is respected. Erma is southward. Gallagher is unready. Gallagher is not adrift. Barbie is unready. Cold, bifid people are anxiolytic. If someone is respected then they are bifid. If someone is unready then they are bifid. If Erma is adrift then Erma is unready. If Erma is pessimum and Erma is not respected then Erma is adrift. All respected people are adrift. Annabelle is adrift.", "logic": "\nnot Bifid(annabelle)\nPessimum(annabelle)\nRespected(erma)\nSouthward(erma)\nUnready(gallagher)\nnot Adrift(gallagher)\nUnready(barbie)\nforall x (Unready(x) and Bifid(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Bifid(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Bifid(x))\nAdrift(erma) -> Unready(erma)\nPessimum(erma) and not Respected(erma) -> Adrift(erma)\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Adrift(x))\n\nAdrift(annabelle)\n\nforall x (Respected(x) -> Adrift(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Candace is not miserly. Candace is elapsed. Emory is cxxx. Emory is narcotic. Acacia is uxorial. Acacia is not dicky. Maggi is uxorial. Cold, miserly people are activated. If someone is cxxx then they are miserly. If someone is uxorial then they are miserly. If Emory is dicky then Emory is uxorial. If Emory is elapsed and Emory is not cxxx then Emory is dicky. All cxxx people are dicky. Maggi is not dicky.", "logic": "\nnot Miserly(candace)\nElapsed(candace)\nCxxx(emory)\nNarcotic(emory)\nUxorial(acacia)\nnot Dicky(acacia)\nUxorial(maggi)\nforall x (Uxorial(x) and Miserly(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Miserly(x))\nforall x (Uxorial(x) -> Miserly(x))\nDicky(emory) -> Uxorial(emory)\nElapsed(emory) and not Cxxx(emory) -> Dicky(emory)\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Dicky(x))\n\nnot Dicky(maggi)\n\nforall x (Cxxx(x) -> Dicky(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Kaleena is not comfy. Kaleena is rutted. Stirling is epicyclic. Stirling is wondering. Christos is surpliced. Christos is not adaptative. Tessi is surpliced. Cold, comfy people are argentine. If someone is epicyclic then they are comfy. If someone is surpliced then they are comfy. If Stirling is adaptative then Stirling is surpliced. If Stirling is rutted and Stirling is not epicyclic then Stirling is adaptative. All epicyclic people are adaptative. Kaleena is surpliced.", "logic": "\nnot Comfy(kaleena)\nRutted(kaleena)\nEpicyclic(stirling)\nWondering(stirling)\nSurpliced(christos)\nnot Adaptative(christos)\nSurpliced(tessi)\nforall x (Surpliced(x) and Comfy(x) -> Argentine(x))\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) -> Comfy(x))\nforall x (Surpliced(x) -> Comfy(x))\nAdaptative(stirling) -> Surpliced(stirling)\nRutted(stirling) and not Epicyclic(stirling) -> Adaptative(stirling)\nforall x (Epicyclic(x) -> Adaptative(x))\n\nSurpliced(kaleena)\n\nSurpliced(kaleena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Kym is not fruiting. Kym is outsize. Krystal is vietnamese. Krystal is amenable. Norina is irruptive. Norina is not aimless. Sherrie is irruptive. Cold, fruiting people are aphaeretic. If someone is vietnamese then they are fruiting. If someone is irruptive then they are fruiting. If Krystal is aimless then Krystal is irruptive. If Krystal is outsize and Krystal is not vietnamese then Krystal is aimless. All vietnamese people are aimless. Norina is not outsize.", "logic": "\nnot Fruiting(kym)\nOutsize(kym)\nVietnamese(krystal)\nAmenable(krystal)\nIrruptive(norina)\nnot Aimless(norina)\nIrruptive(sherrie)\nforall x (Irruptive(x) and Fruiting(x) -> Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) -> Fruiting(x))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) -> Fruiting(x))\nAimless(krystal) -> Irruptive(krystal)\nOutsize(krystal) and not Vietnamese(krystal) -> Aimless(krystal)\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) -> Aimless(x))\n\nnot Outsize(norina)\n\nnot Outsize(norina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Dino is not rhyming. Dino is peaceable. Auroora is setaceous. Auroora is shuddery. Joann is trained. Joann is not belted. Stephi is trained. Cold, rhyming people are apocarpous. If someone is setaceous then they are rhyming. If someone is trained then they are rhyming. If Auroora is belted then Auroora is trained. If Auroora is peaceable and Auroora is not setaceous then Auroora is belted. All setaceous people are belted. Dino is shuddery.", "logic": "\nnot Rhyming(dino)\nPeaceable(dino)\nSetaceous(auroora)\nShuddery(auroora)\nTrained(joann)\nnot Belted(joann)\nTrained(stephi)\nforall x (Trained(x) and Rhyming(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Setaceous(x) -> Rhyming(x))\nforall x (Trained(x) -> Rhyming(x))\nBelted(auroora) -> Trained(auroora)\nPeaceable(auroora) and not Setaceous(auroora) -> Belted(auroora)\nforall x (Setaceous(x) -> Belted(x))\n\nShuddery(dino)\n\nShuddery(dino) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Fancie is not burlesque. Fancie is downstream. Piotr is true. Piotr is literal. Greta is clouded. Greta is not grapy. Jesselyn is clouded. Cold, burlesque people are laciniate. If someone is true then they are burlesque. If someone is clouded then they are burlesque. If Piotr is grapy then Piotr is clouded. If Piotr is downstream and Piotr is not true then Piotr is grapy. All true people are grapy. Greta is not true.", "logic": "\nnot Burlesque(fancie)\nDownstream(fancie)\nTrue(piotr)\nLiteral(piotr)\nClouded(greta)\nnot Grapy(greta)\nClouded(jesselyn)\nforall x (Clouded(x) and Burlesque(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (True(x) -> Burlesque(x))\nforall x (Clouded(x) -> Burlesque(x))\nGrapy(piotr) -> Clouded(piotr)\nDownstream(piotr) and not True(piotr) -> Grapy(piotr)\nforall x (True(x) -> Grapy(x))\n\nnot True(greta)\n\nnot True(greta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "Lorry is not caecilian. Lorry is cross. Berty is offhand. Berty is obviating. Jori is cenobitic. Jori is not assumptive. Thekla is cenobitic. Cold, caecilian people are flashy. If someone is offhand then they are caecilian. If someone is cenobitic then they are caecilian. If Berty is assumptive then Berty is cenobitic. If Berty is cross and Berty is not offhand then Berty is assumptive. All offhand people are assumptive. Jori is obviating.", "logic": "\nnot Caecilian(lorry)\nCross(lorry)\nOffhand(berty)\nObviating(berty)\nCenobitic(jori)\nnot Assumptive(jori)\nCenobitic(thekla)\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) and Caecilian(x) -> Flashy(x))\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Caecilian(x))\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Caecilian(x))\nAssumptive(berty) -> Cenobitic(berty)\nCross(berty) and not Offhand(berty) -> Assumptive(berty)\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Assumptive(x))\n\nObviating(jori)\n\nObviating(jori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-872"} {"premises": "The daren unseat the jonathan. The dyan unseat the daren. The jonathan is not candent. The jonathan is not amoeban. The jonathan is not plotted. The jonathan parch the daren. The jonathan monetise the daren. If someone monetise the jonathan then they do not need the jonathan. If the jonathan parch the daren then the jonathan monetise the dyan. If the daren is admissible and the daren monetise the jonathan then the daren parch the dyan. If the jonathan is admissible then the jonathan is greenside. If someone monetise the daren then the daren is admissible. If someone parch the dyan then they do not chase the daren. If someone monetise the daren and they visit the dyan then they need the dyan. If someone is amoeban and they do not need the dyan then they chase the jonathan. The jonathan parch the daren.", "logic": "\nUnseat(daren, jonathan)\nUnseat(dyan, daren)\nnot Candent(jonathan)\nnot Amoeban(jonathan)\nnot Plotted(jonathan)\nParch(jonathan, daren)\nMonetise(jonathan, daren)\nforall x (Monetise(x, jonathan) -> not Parch(x, jonathan))\nParch(jonathan, daren) -> Monetise(jonathan, dyan)\nAdmissible(daren) and Monetise(daren, jonathan) -> Parch(daren, dyan)\nAdmissible(jonathan) -> Greenside(jonathan)\nforall x (Monetise(x, daren) -> Admissible(daren))\nforall x (Parch(x, dyan) -> not Unseat(x, daren))\nforall x (Monetise(x, daren) and Monetise(x, dyan) -> Parch(x, dyan))\nforall x (Amoeban(x) and not Parch(x, dyan) -> Unseat(x, jonathan))\n\nParch(jonathan, daren)\n\ntherefore Parch(jonathan, daren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The fianna airt the fianna. The hiro airt the fianna. The fianna is not unversed. The fianna is not ophthalmic. The fianna is not sometime. The fianna perfume the fianna. The fianna career the fianna. If someone career the fianna then they do not need the fianna. If the fianna perfume the fianna then the fianna career the hiro. If the fianna is drilled and the fianna career the fianna then the fianna perfume the hiro. If the fianna is drilled then the fianna is phlegmy. If someone career the fianna then the fianna is drilled. If someone perfume the hiro then they do not chase the fianna. If someone career the fianna and they visit the hiro then they need the hiro. If someone is ophthalmic and they do not need the hiro then they chase the fianna. The fianna is ophthalmic.", "logic": "\nAirt(fianna, fianna)\nAirt(hiro, fianna)\nnot Unversed(fianna)\nnot Ophthalmic(fianna)\nnot Sometime(fianna)\nPerfume(fianna, fianna)\nCareer(fianna, fianna)\nforall x (Career(x, fianna) -> not Perfume(x, fianna))\nPerfume(fianna, fianna) -> Career(fianna, hiro)\nDrilled(fianna) and Career(fianna, fianna) -> Perfume(fianna, hiro)\nDrilled(fianna) -> Phlegmy(fianna)\nforall x (Career(x, fianna) -> Drilled(fianna))\nforall x (Perfume(x, hiro) -> not Airt(x, fianna))\nforall x (Career(x, fianna) and Career(x, hiro) -> Perfume(x, hiro))\nforall x (Ophthalmic(x) and not Perfume(x, hiro) -> Airt(x, fianna))\n\nOphthalmic(fianna)\n\ntherefore not Ophthalmic(fianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The fredrika divine the isidore. The sivert divine the fredrika. The isidore is not here. The isidore is not puffed. The isidore is not fistulate. The isidore reimpose the fredrika. The isidore drone the fredrika. If someone drone the isidore then they do not need the isidore. If the isidore reimpose the fredrika then the isidore drone the sivert. If the fredrika is wishful and the fredrika drone the isidore then the fredrika reimpose the sivert. If the isidore is wishful then the isidore is terminal. If someone drone the fredrika then the fredrika is wishful. If someone reimpose the sivert then they do not chase the fredrika. If someone drone the fredrika and they visit the sivert then they need the sivert. If someone is puffed and they do not need the sivert then they chase the isidore. The fredrika is wishful.", "logic": "\nDivine(fredrika, isidore)\nDivine(sivert, fredrika)\nnot Here(isidore)\nnot Puffed(isidore)\nnot Fistulate(isidore)\nReimpose(isidore, fredrika)\nDrone(isidore, fredrika)\nforall x (Drone(x, isidore) -> not Reimpose(x, isidore))\nReimpose(isidore, fredrika) -> Drone(isidore, sivert)\nWishful(fredrika) and Drone(fredrika, isidore) -> Reimpose(fredrika, sivert)\nWishful(isidore) -> Terminal(isidore)\nforall x (Drone(x, fredrika) -> Wishful(fredrika))\nforall x (Reimpose(x, sivert) -> not Divine(x, fredrika))\nforall x (Drone(x, fredrika) and Drone(x, sivert) -> Reimpose(x, sivert))\nforall x (Puffed(x) and not Reimpose(x, sivert) -> Divine(x, isidore))\n\nWishful(fredrika)\n\nDrone(isidore, fredrika) and forall x (Drone(x, fredrika) -> Wishful(fredrika)) -> therefore Wishful(fredrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The sophia detoxify the agace. The evaleen detoxify the sophia. The agace is not balsamy. The agace is not jerkwater. The agace is not indelicate. The agace discontent the sophia. The agace bucket the sophia. If someone bucket the agace then they do not need the agace. If the agace discontent the sophia then the agace bucket the evaleen. If the sophia is quantized and the sophia bucket the agace then the sophia discontent the evaleen. If the agace is quantized then the agace is retentive. If someone bucket the sophia then the sophia is quantized. If someone discontent the evaleen then they do not chase the sophia. If someone bucket the sophia and they visit the evaleen then they need the evaleen. If someone is jerkwater and they do not need the evaleen then they chase the agace. The agace does not visit the evaleen.", "logic": "\nDetoxify(sophia, agace)\nDetoxify(evaleen, sophia)\nnot Balsamy(agace)\nnot Jerkwater(agace)\nnot Indelicate(agace)\nDiscontent(agace, sophia)\nBucket(agace, sophia)\nforall x (Bucket(x, agace) -> not Discontent(x, agace))\nDiscontent(agace, sophia) -> Bucket(agace, evaleen)\nQuantized(sophia) and Bucket(sophia, agace) -> Discontent(sophia, evaleen)\nQuantized(agace) -> Retentive(agace)\nforall x (Bucket(x, sophia) -> Quantized(sophia))\nforall x (Discontent(x, evaleen) -> not Detoxify(x, sophia))\nforall x (Bucket(x, sophia) and Bucket(x, evaleen) -> Discontent(x, evaleen))\nforall x (Jerkwater(x) and not Discontent(x, evaleen) -> Detoxify(x, agace))\n\nnot Bucket(agace, evaleen)\n\nDiscontent(agace, sophia) and Discontent(agace, sophia) -> Bucket(agace, evaleen) -> therefore Bucket(agace, evaleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The aurilia pardon the lucius. The abdul pardon the aurilia. The lucius is not pouring. The lucius is not uremic. The lucius is not thirteenth. The lucius miscount the aurilia. The lucius decolorise the aurilia. If someone decolorise the lucius then they do not need the lucius. If the lucius miscount the aurilia then the lucius decolorise the abdul. If the aurilia is admittable and the aurilia decolorise the lucius then the aurilia miscount the abdul. If the lucius is admittable then the lucius is unsweet. If someone decolorise the aurilia then the aurilia is admittable. If someone miscount the abdul then they do not chase the aurilia. If someone decolorise the aurilia and they visit the abdul then they need the abdul. If someone is uremic and they do not need the abdul then they chase the lucius. The lucius miscount the abdul.", "logic": "\nPardon(aurilia, lucius)\nPardon(abdul, aurilia)\nnot Pouring(lucius)\nnot Uremic(lucius)\nnot Thirteenth(lucius)\nMiscount(lucius, aurilia)\nDecolorise(lucius, aurilia)\nforall x (Decolorise(x, lucius) -> not Miscount(x, lucius))\nMiscount(lucius, aurilia) -> Decolorise(lucius, abdul)\nAdmittable(aurilia) and Decolorise(aurilia, lucius) -> Miscount(aurilia, abdul)\nAdmittable(lucius) -> Unsweet(lucius)\nforall x (Decolorise(x, aurilia) -> Admittable(aurilia))\nforall x (Miscount(x, abdul) -> not Pardon(x, aurilia))\nforall x (Decolorise(x, aurilia) and Decolorise(x, abdul) -> Miscount(x, abdul))\nforall x (Uremic(x) and not Miscount(x, abdul) -> Pardon(x, lucius))\n\nMiscount(lucius, abdul)\n\nMiscount(lucius, aurilia) and Miscount(lucius, aurilia) -> Decolorise(lucius, abdul) -> therefore Decolorise(lucius, abdul) Decolorise(lucius, aurilia) and Decolorise(lucius, abdul) and forall x (Decolorise(x, aurilia) and Decolorise(x, abdul) -> Miscount(x, abdul)) -> therefore Miscount(lucius, abdul)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The kari classicise the ginelle. The lyn classicise the kari. The ginelle is not teutonic. The ginelle is not unactable. The ginelle is not backless. The ginelle damascene the kari. The ginelle seal the kari. If someone seal the ginelle then they do not need the ginelle. If the ginelle damascene the kari then the ginelle seal the lyn. If the kari is failing and the kari seal the ginelle then the kari damascene the lyn. If the ginelle is failing then the ginelle is licenced. If someone seal the kari then the kari is failing. If someone damascene the lyn then they do not chase the kari. If someone seal the kari and they visit the lyn then they need the lyn. If someone is unactable and they do not need the lyn then they chase the ginelle. The ginelle does not need the lyn.", "logic": "\nClassicise(kari, ginelle)\nClassicise(lyn, kari)\nnot Teutonic(ginelle)\nnot Unactable(ginelle)\nnot Backless(ginelle)\nDamascene(ginelle, kari)\nSeal(ginelle, kari)\nforall x (Seal(x, ginelle) -> not Damascene(x, ginelle))\nDamascene(ginelle, kari) -> Seal(ginelle, lyn)\nFailing(kari) and Seal(kari, ginelle) -> Damascene(kari, lyn)\nFailing(ginelle) -> Licenced(ginelle)\nforall x (Seal(x, kari) -> Failing(kari))\nforall x (Damascene(x, lyn) -> not Classicise(x, kari))\nforall x (Seal(x, kari) and Seal(x, lyn) -> Damascene(x, lyn))\nforall x (Unactable(x) and not Damascene(x, lyn) -> Classicise(x, ginelle))\n\nnot Damascene(ginelle, lyn)\n\nDamascene(ginelle, kari) and Damascene(ginelle, kari) -> Seal(ginelle, lyn) -> therefore Seal(ginelle, lyn) Seal(ginelle, kari) and Seal(ginelle, lyn) and forall x (Seal(x, kari) and Seal(x, lyn) -> Damascene(x, lyn)) -> therefore Damascene(ginelle, lyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The consuelo stylize the marje. The willette stylize the consuelo. The marje is not cogitative. The marje is not chewable. The marje is not ottoman. The marje asterisk the consuelo. The marje unionize the consuelo. If someone unionize the marje then they do not need the marje. If the marje asterisk the consuelo then the marje unionize the willette. If the consuelo is acarpous and the consuelo unionize the marje then the consuelo asterisk the willette. If the marje is acarpous then the marje is obtrusive. If someone unionize the consuelo then the consuelo is acarpous. If someone asterisk the willette then they do not chase the consuelo. If someone unionize the consuelo and they visit the willette then they need the willette. If someone is chewable and they do not need the willette then they chase the marje. The marje does not chase the consuelo.", "logic": "\nStylize(consuelo, marje)\nStylize(willette, consuelo)\nnot Cogitative(marje)\nnot Chewable(marje)\nnot Ottoman(marje)\nAsterisk(marje, consuelo)\nUnionize(marje, consuelo)\nforall x (Unionize(x, marje) -> not Asterisk(x, marje))\nAsterisk(marje, consuelo) -> Unionize(marje, willette)\nAcarpous(consuelo) and Unionize(consuelo, marje) -> Asterisk(consuelo, willette)\nAcarpous(marje) -> Obtrusive(marje)\nforall x (Unionize(x, consuelo) -> Acarpous(consuelo))\nforall x (Asterisk(x, willette) -> not Stylize(x, consuelo))\nforall x (Unionize(x, consuelo) and Unionize(x, willette) -> Asterisk(x, willette))\nforall x (Chewable(x) and not Asterisk(x, willette) -> Stylize(x, marje))\n\nnot Stylize(marje, consuelo)\n\nAsterisk(marje, consuelo) and Asterisk(marje, consuelo) -> Unionize(marje, willette) -> therefore Unionize(marje, willette) Unionize(marje, consuelo) and Unionize(marje, willette) and forall x (Unionize(x, consuelo) and Unionize(x, willette) -> Asterisk(x, willette)) -> therefore Asterisk(marje, willette) Asterisk(marje, willette) and forall x (Asterisk(x, willette) -> not Stylize(x, consuelo)) -> therefore not Stylize(marje, consuelo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The mead unmake the augusto. The tanner unmake the mead. The augusto is not undyed. The augusto is not concerned. The augusto is not tempting. The augusto dingdong the mead. The augusto applique the mead. If someone applique the augusto then they do not need the augusto. If the augusto dingdong the mead then the augusto applique the tanner. If the mead is convulsive and the mead applique the augusto then the mead dingdong the tanner. If the augusto is convulsive then the augusto is antsy. If someone applique the mead then the mead is convulsive. If someone dingdong the tanner then they do not chase the mead. If someone applique the mead and they visit the tanner then they need the tanner. If someone is concerned and they do not need the tanner then they chase the augusto. The augusto unmake the mead.", "logic": "\nUnmake(mead, augusto)\nUnmake(tanner, mead)\nnot Undyed(augusto)\nnot Concerned(augusto)\nnot Tempting(augusto)\nDingdong(augusto, mead)\nApplique(augusto, mead)\nforall x (Applique(x, augusto) -> not Dingdong(x, augusto))\nDingdong(augusto, mead) -> Applique(augusto, tanner)\nConvulsive(mead) and Applique(mead, augusto) -> Dingdong(mead, tanner)\nConvulsive(augusto) -> Antsy(augusto)\nforall x (Applique(x, mead) -> Convulsive(mead))\nforall x (Dingdong(x, tanner) -> not Unmake(x, mead))\nforall x (Applique(x, mead) and Applique(x, tanner) -> Dingdong(x, tanner))\nforall x (Concerned(x) and not Dingdong(x, tanner) -> Unmake(x, augusto))\n\nUnmake(augusto, mead)\n\nDingdong(augusto, mead) and Dingdong(augusto, mead) -> Applique(augusto, tanner) -> therefore Applique(augusto, tanner) Applique(augusto, mead) and Applique(augusto, tanner) and forall x (Applique(x, mead) and Applique(x, tanner) -> Dingdong(x, tanner)) -> therefore Dingdong(augusto, tanner) Dingdong(augusto, tanner) and forall x (Dingdong(x, tanner) -> not Unmake(x, mead)) -> therefore not Unmake(augusto, mead)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The karlyn chouse the nelsen. The henrieta chouse the karlyn. The nelsen is not anoxic. The nelsen is not trained. The nelsen is not another. The nelsen unteach the karlyn. The nelsen stroll the karlyn. If someone stroll the nelsen then they do not need the nelsen. If the nelsen unteach the karlyn then the nelsen stroll the henrieta. If the karlyn is eudemonic and the karlyn stroll the nelsen then the karlyn unteach the henrieta. If the nelsen is eudemonic then the nelsen is penniless. If someone stroll the karlyn then the karlyn is eudemonic. If someone unteach the henrieta then they do not chase the karlyn. If someone stroll the karlyn and they visit the henrieta then they need the henrieta. If someone is trained and they do not need the henrieta then they chase the nelsen. The karlyn does not need the henrieta.", "logic": "\nChouse(karlyn, nelsen)\nChouse(henrieta, karlyn)\nnot Anoxic(nelsen)\nnot Trained(nelsen)\nnot Another(nelsen)\nUnteach(nelsen, karlyn)\nStroll(nelsen, karlyn)\nforall x (Stroll(x, nelsen) -> not Unteach(x, nelsen))\nUnteach(nelsen, karlyn) -> Stroll(nelsen, henrieta)\nEudemonic(karlyn) and Stroll(karlyn, nelsen) -> Unteach(karlyn, henrieta)\nEudemonic(nelsen) -> Penniless(nelsen)\nforall x (Stroll(x, karlyn) -> Eudemonic(karlyn))\nforall x (Unteach(x, henrieta) -> not Chouse(x, karlyn))\nforall x (Stroll(x, karlyn) and Stroll(x, henrieta) -> Unteach(x, henrieta))\nforall x (Trained(x) and not Unteach(x, henrieta) -> Chouse(x, nelsen))\n\nnot Unteach(karlyn, henrieta)\n\nEudemonic(karlyn) and Stroll(karlyn, nelsen) -> Unteach(karlyn, henrieta) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The stan disinfest the martie. The mirabel disinfest the stan. The martie is not amendatory. The martie is not wedged. The martie is not epiphysial. The martie mourn the stan. The martie childproof the stan. If someone childproof the martie then they do not need the martie. If the martie mourn the stan then the martie childproof the mirabel. If the stan is annulated and the stan childproof the martie then the stan mourn the mirabel. If the martie is annulated then the martie is veiled. If someone childproof the stan then the stan is annulated. If someone mourn the mirabel then they do not chase the stan. If someone childproof the stan and they visit the mirabel then they need the mirabel. If someone is wedged and they do not need the mirabel then they chase the martie. The martie is veiled.", "logic": "\nDisinfest(stan, martie)\nDisinfest(mirabel, stan)\nnot Amendatory(martie)\nnot Wedged(martie)\nnot Epiphysial(martie)\nMourn(martie, stan)\nChildproof(martie, stan)\nforall x (Childproof(x, martie) -> not Mourn(x, martie))\nMourn(martie, stan) -> Childproof(martie, mirabel)\nAnnulated(stan) and Childproof(stan, martie) -> Mourn(stan, mirabel)\nAnnulated(martie) -> Veiled(martie)\nforall x (Childproof(x, stan) -> Annulated(stan))\nforall x (Mourn(x, mirabel) -> not Disinfest(x, stan))\nforall x (Childproof(x, stan) and Childproof(x, mirabel) -> Mourn(x, mirabel))\nforall x (Wedged(x) and not Mourn(x, mirabel) -> Disinfest(x, martie))\n\nVeiled(martie)\n\nAnnulated(martie) -> Veiled(martie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The dottie scotch the cesar. The tomas scotch the dottie. The cesar is not barbellate. The cesar is not profaned. The cesar is not cramped. The cesar tonsure the dottie. The cesar prepose the dottie. If someone prepose the cesar then they do not need the cesar. If the cesar tonsure the dottie then the cesar prepose the tomas. If the dottie is unsalable and the dottie prepose the cesar then the dottie tonsure the tomas. If the cesar is unsalable then the cesar is corneal. If someone prepose the dottie then the dottie is unsalable. If someone tonsure the tomas then they do not chase the dottie. If someone prepose the dottie and they visit the tomas then they need the tomas. If someone is profaned and they do not need the tomas then they chase the cesar. The cesar does not chase the cesar.", "logic": "\nScotch(dottie, cesar)\nScotch(tomas, dottie)\nnot Barbellate(cesar)\nnot Profaned(cesar)\nnot Cramped(cesar)\nTonsure(cesar, dottie)\nPrepose(cesar, dottie)\nforall x (Prepose(x, cesar) -> not Tonsure(x, cesar))\nTonsure(cesar, dottie) -> Prepose(cesar, tomas)\nUnsalable(dottie) and Prepose(dottie, cesar) -> Tonsure(dottie, tomas)\nUnsalable(cesar) -> Corneal(cesar)\nforall x (Prepose(x, dottie) -> Unsalable(dottie))\nforall x (Tonsure(x, tomas) -> not Scotch(x, dottie))\nforall x (Prepose(x, dottie) and Prepose(x, tomas) -> Tonsure(x, tomas))\nforall x (Profaned(x) and not Tonsure(x, tomas) -> Scotch(x, cesar))\n\nnot Scotch(cesar, cesar)\n\nforall x (Profaned(x) and not Tonsure(x, tomas) -> Scotch(x, cesar)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The mae rejoice the katti. The joya rejoice the mae. The katti is not insincere. The katti is not coarctate. The katti is not teenaged. The katti unbuckle the mae. The katti schlep the mae. If someone schlep the katti then they do not need the katti. If the katti unbuckle the mae then the katti schlep the joya. If the mae is underage and the mae schlep the katti then the mae unbuckle the joya. If the katti is underage then the katti is hearable. If someone schlep the mae then the mae is underage. If someone unbuckle the joya then they do not chase the mae. If someone schlep the mae and they visit the joya then they need the joya. If someone is coarctate and they do not need the joya then they chase the katti. The joya unbuckle the joya.", "logic": "\nRejoice(mae, katti)\nRejoice(joya, mae)\nnot Insincere(katti)\nnot Coarctate(katti)\nnot Teenaged(katti)\nUnbuckle(katti, mae)\nSchlep(katti, mae)\nforall x (Schlep(x, katti) -> not Unbuckle(x, katti))\nUnbuckle(katti, mae) -> Schlep(katti, joya)\nUnderage(mae) and Schlep(mae, katti) -> Unbuckle(mae, joya)\nUnderage(katti) -> Hearable(katti)\nforall x (Schlep(x, mae) -> Underage(mae))\nforall x (Unbuckle(x, joya) -> not Rejoice(x, mae))\nforall x (Schlep(x, mae) and Schlep(x, joya) -> Unbuckle(x, joya))\nforall x (Coarctate(x) and not Unbuckle(x, joya) -> Rejoice(x, katti))\n\nUnbuckle(joya, joya)\n\nforall x (Schlep(x, mae) and Schlep(x, joya) -> Unbuckle(x, joya)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The sheila program the bradley. The lillian program the sheila. The bradley is not kaput. The bradley is not premedical. The bradley is not unenclosed. The bradley powderise the sheila. The bradley deter the sheila. If someone deter the bradley then they do not need the bradley. If the bradley powderise the sheila then the bradley deter the lillian. If the sheila is placeable and the sheila deter the bradley then the sheila powderise the lillian. If the bradley is placeable then the bradley is drugless. If someone deter the sheila then the sheila is placeable. If someone powderise the lillian then they do not chase the sheila. If someone deter the sheila and they visit the lillian then they need the lillian. If someone is premedical and they do not need the lillian then they chase the bradley. The sheila does not need the sheila.", "logic": "\nProgram(sheila, bradley)\nProgram(lillian, sheila)\nnot Kaput(bradley)\nnot Premedical(bradley)\nnot Unenclosed(bradley)\nPowderise(bradley, sheila)\nDeter(bradley, sheila)\nforall x (Deter(x, bradley) -> not Powderise(x, bradley))\nPowderise(bradley, sheila) -> Deter(bradley, lillian)\nPlaceable(sheila) and Deter(sheila, bradley) -> Powderise(sheila, lillian)\nPlaceable(bradley) -> Drugless(bradley)\nforall x (Deter(x, sheila) -> Placeable(sheila))\nforall x (Powderise(x, lillian) -> not Program(x, sheila))\nforall x (Deter(x, sheila) and Deter(x, lillian) -> Powderise(x, lillian))\nforall x (Premedical(x) and not Powderise(x, lillian) -> Program(x, bradley))\n\nnot Powderise(sheila, sheila)\n\nnot Powderise(sheila, sheila) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The morlee jail the carsten. The blanca jail the morlee. The carsten is not blinking. The carsten is not expectant. The carsten is not hardfisted. The carsten coin the morlee. The carsten occlude the morlee. If someone occlude the carsten then they do not need the carsten. If the carsten coin the morlee then the carsten occlude the blanca. If the morlee is hurt and the morlee occlude the carsten then the morlee coin the blanca. If the carsten is hurt then the carsten is alluring. If someone occlude the morlee then the morlee is hurt. If someone coin the blanca then they do not chase the morlee. If someone occlude the morlee and they visit the blanca then they need the blanca. If someone is expectant and they do not need the blanca then they chase the carsten. The blanca coin the morlee.", "logic": "\nJail(morlee, carsten)\nJail(blanca, morlee)\nnot Blinking(carsten)\nnot Expectant(carsten)\nnot Hardfisted(carsten)\nCoin(carsten, morlee)\nOcclude(carsten, morlee)\nforall x (Occlude(x, carsten) -> not Coin(x, carsten))\nCoin(carsten, morlee) -> Occlude(carsten, blanca)\nHurt(morlee) and Occlude(morlee, carsten) -> Coin(morlee, blanca)\nHurt(carsten) -> Alluring(carsten)\nforall x (Occlude(x, morlee) -> Hurt(morlee))\nforall x (Coin(x, blanca) -> not Jail(x, morlee))\nforall x (Occlude(x, morlee) and Occlude(x, blanca) -> Coin(x, blanca))\nforall x (Expectant(x) and not Coin(x, blanca) -> Jail(x, carsten))\n\nCoin(blanca, morlee)\n\nCoin(blanca, morlee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The gunvor mirror the ulises. The siana mirror the gunvor. The ulises is not packaged. The ulises is not sissyish. The ulises is not milky. The ulises structure the gunvor. The ulises convect the gunvor. If someone convect the ulises then they do not need the ulises. If the ulises structure the gunvor then the ulises convect the siana. If the gunvor is botuliform and the gunvor convect the ulises then the gunvor structure the siana. If the ulises is botuliform then the ulises is dianoetic. If someone convect the gunvor then the gunvor is botuliform. If someone structure the siana then they do not chase the gunvor. If someone convect the gunvor and they visit the siana then they need the siana. If someone is sissyish and they do not need the siana then they chase the ulises. The gunvor does not need the ulises.", "logic": "\nMirror(gunvor, ulises)\nMirror(siana, gunvor)\nnot Packaged(ulises)\nnot Sissyish(ulises)\nnot Milky(ulises)\nStructure(ulises, gunvor)\nConvect(ulises, gunvor)\nforall x (Convect(x, ulises) -> not Structure(x, ulises))\nStructure(ulises, gunvor) -> Convect(ulises, siana)\nBotuliform(gunvor) and Convect(gunvor, ulises) -> Structure(gunvor, siana)\nBotuliform(ulises) -> Dianoetic(ulises)\nforall x (Convect(x, gunvor) -> Botuliform(gunvor))\nforall x (Structure(x, siana) -> not Mirror(x, gunvor))\nforall x (Convect(x, gunvor) and Convect(x, siana) -> Structure(x, siana))\nforall x (Sissyish(x) and not Structure(x, siana) -> Mirror(x, ulises))\n\nnot Structure(gunvor, ulises)\n\nnot Structure(gunvor, ulises) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "The cindy banquet the izaak. The emalia banquet the cindy. The izaak is not aplacental. The izaak is not jerky. The izaak is not delirious. The izaak rumour the cindy. The izaak degrease the cindy. If someone degrease the izaak then they do not need the izaak. If the izaak rumour the cindy then the izaak degrease the emalia. If the cindy is isothermic and the cindy degrease the izaak then the cindy rumour the emalia. If the izaak is isothermic then the izaak is sisterlike. If someone degrease the cindy then the cindy is isothermic. If someone rumour the emalia then they do not chase the cindy. If someone degrease the cindy and they visit the emalia then they need the emalia. If someone is jerky and they do not need the emalia then they chase the izaak. The emalia is isothermic.", "logic": "\nBanquet(cindy, izaak)\nBanquet(emalia, cindy)\nnot Aplacental(izaak)\nnot Jerky(izaak)\nnot Delirious(izaak)\nRumour(izaak, cindy)\nDegrease(izaak, cindy)\nforall x (Degrease(x, izaak) -> not Rumour(x, izaak))\nRumour(izaak, cindy) -> Degrease(izaak, emalia)\nIsothermic(cindy) and Degrease(cindy, izaak) -> Rumour(cindy, emalia)\nIsothermic(izaak) -> Sisterlike(izaak)\nforall x (Degrease(x, cindy) -> Isothermic(cindy))\nforall x (Rumour(x, emalia) -> not Banquet(x, cindy))\nforall x (Degrease(x, cindy) and Degrease(x, emalia) -> Rumour(x, emalia))\nforall x (Jerky(x) and not Rumour(x, emalia) -> Banquet(x, izaak))\n\nIsothermic(emalia)\n\nIsothermic(emalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1262"} {"premises": "Jilleen is comparable. Mayer is christlike. Deloria is dishy. Rough, unequaled things are groomed. Jilleen is comparable.", "logic": "\nComparable(jilleen)\nChristlike(mayer)\nDishy(deloria)\nforall x (Botonnee(x) and Unequaled(x) -> Groomed(x))\n\nComparable(jilleen)\n\ntherefore Comparable(jilleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1932"} {"premises": "Tommie is medieval. Aguinaldo is alpestrine. Wade is teachable. Rough, enticing things are myotic. Wade is not teachable.", "logic": "\nMedieval(tommie)\nAlpestrine(aguinaldo)\nTeachable(wade)\nforall x (Casteless(x) and Enticing(x) -> Myotic(x))\n\nnot Teachable(wade)\n\ntherefore Teachable(wade)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1932"} {"premises": "Merrill is washed. Renae is amnic. Kessia is pouring. Rough, sanative things are overriding. Kessia is not overriding.", "logic": "\nWashed(merrill)\nAmnic(renae)\nPouring(kessia)\nforall x (Carnal(x) and Sanative(x) -> Overriding(x))\n\nnot Overriding(kessia)\n\nforall x (Carnal(x) and Sanative(x) -> Overriding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1932"} {"premises": "Joshua is dormant. John is fanatical. Louie is uncaring. Rough, asserting things are behavioral. John is asserting.", "logic": "\nDormant(joshua)\nFanatical(john)\nUncaring(louie)\nforall x (Megalithic(x) and Asserting(x) -> Behavioral(x))\n\nAsserting(john)\n\nAsserting(john) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-1932"} {"premises": "The albert is noticeable. The albert foregather the iseabal. The albert foregather the roxana. The albert mercerise the iseabal. The albert mercerise the roxana. The albert unbraid the iseabal. The albert unbraid the roxana. The iseabal is olympic. The iseabal mercerise the roxana. The iseabal unbraid the albert. The roxana is amerindic. The roxana is cockamamy. The roxana foregather the albert. The roxana mercerise the iseabal. The roxana unbraid the albert. The roxana unbraid the iseabal. If something foregather the albert then the albert foregather the roxana. If something is ametropic then it foregather the iseabal. If something is olympic then it mercerise the albert. If something mercerise the albert and the albert foregather the roxana then it foregather the albert. If the iseabal foregather the roxana and the roxana mercerise the iseabal then the iseabal mercerise the roxana. If something foregather the albert then it foregather the iseabal. If the iseabal foregather the roxana and the roxana mercerise the albert then the roxana mercerise the iseabal. If something mercerise the iseabal then the iseabal is cockamamy. The albert mercerise the roxana.", "logic": "\nNoticeable(albert)\nForegather(albert, iseabal)\nForegather(albert, roxana)\nMercerise(albert, iseabal)\nMercerise(albert, roxana)\nUnbraid(albert, iseabal)\nUnbraid(albert, roxana)\nOlympic(iseabal)\nMercerise(iseabal, roxana)\nUnbraid(iseabal, albert)\nAmerindic(roxana)\nCockamamy(roxana)\nForegather(roxana, albert)\nMercerise(roxana, iseabal)\nUnbraid(roxana, albert)\nUnbraid(roxana, iseabal)\nforall x (Foregather(x, albert) -> Foregather(albert, roxana))\nforall x (Ametropic(x) -> Foregather(x, iseabal))\nforall x (Olympic(x) -> Mercerise(x, albert))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, albert) and Foregather(albert, roxana) -> Foregather(x, albert))\nForegather(iseabal, roxana) and Mercerise(roxana, iseabal) -> Mercerise(iseabal, roxana)\nforall x (Foregather(x, albert) -> Foregather(x, iseabal))\nForegather(iseabal, roxana) and Mercerise(roxana, albert) -> Mercerise(roxana, iseabal)\nforall x (Mercerise(x, iseabal) -> Cockamamy(iseabal))\n\nMercerise(albert, roxana)\n\ntherefore Mercerise(albert, roxana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The jemima is wandering. The jemima lodge the willi. The jemima lodge the ilsa. The jemima wine the willi. The jemima wine the ilsa. The jemima consociate the willi. The jemima consociate the ilsa. The willi is bush. The willi wine the ilsa. The willi consociate the jemima. The ilsa is untraveled. The ilsa is armlike. The ilsa lodge the jemima. The ilsa wine the willi. The ilsa consociate the jemima. The ilsa consociate the willi. If something lodge the jemima then the jemima lodge the ilsa. If something is satyric then it lodge the willi. If something is bush then it wine the jemima. If something wine the jemima and the jemima lodge the ilsa then it lodge the jemima. If the willi lodge the ilsa and the ilsa wine the willi then the willi wine the ilsa. If something lodge the jemima then it lodge the willi. If the willi lodge the ilsa and the ilsa wine the jemima then the ilsa wine the willi. If something wine the willi then the willi is armlike. The willi does not see the ilsa.", "logic": "\nWandering(jemima)\nLodge(jemima, willi)\nLodge(jemima, ilsa)\nWine(jemima, willi)\nWine(jemima, ilsa)\nConsociate(jemima, willi)\nConsociate(jemima, ilsa)\nBush(willi)\nWine(willi, ilsa)\nConsociate(willi, jemima)\nUntraveled(ilsa)\nArmlike(ilsa)\nLodge(ilsa, jemima)\nWine(ilsa, willi)\nConsociate(ilsa, jemima)\nConsociate(ilsa, willi)\nforall x (Lodge(x, jemima) -> Lodge(jemima, ilsa))\nforall x (Satyric(x) -> Lodge(x, willi))\nforall x (Bush(x) -> Wine(x, jemima))\nforall x (Wine(x, jemima) and Lodge(jemima, ilsa) -> Lodge(x, jemima))\nLodge(willi, ilsa) and Wine(ilsa, willi) -> Wine(willi, ilsa)\nforall x (Lodge(x, jemima) -> Lodge(x, willi))\nLodge(willi, ilsa) and Wine(ilsa, jemima) -> Wine(ilsa, willi)\nforall x (Wine(x, willi) -> Armlike(willi))\n\nnot Wine(willi, ilsa)\n\ntherefore Wine(willi, ilsa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The eunice is humorless. The eunice interpret the rafaelita. The eunice interpret the barbe. The eunice whack the rafaelita. The eunice whack the barbe. The eunice overstress the rafaelita. The eunice overstress the barbe. The rafaelita is accordant. The rafaelita whack the barbe. The rafaelita overstress the eunice. The barbe is impacted. The barbe is amebous. The barbe interpret the eunice. The barbe whack the rafaelita. The barbe overstress the eunice. The barbe overstress the rafaelita. If something interpret the eunice then the eunice interpret the barbe. If something is trousered then it interpret the rafaelita. If something is accordant then it whack the eunice. If something whack the eunice and the eunice interpret the barbe then it interpret the eunice. If the rafaelita interpret the barbe and the barbe whack the rafaelita then the rafaelita whack the barbe. If something interpret the eunice then it interpret the rafaelita. If the rafaelita interpret the barbe and the barbe whack the eunice then the barbe whack the rafaelita. If something whack the rafaelita then the rafaelita is amebous. The rafaelita is amebous.", "logic": "\nHumorless(eunice)\nInterpret(eunice, rafaelita)\nInterpret(eunice, barbe)\nWhack(eunice, rafaelita)\nWhack(eunice, barbe)\nOverstress(eunice, rafaelita)\nOverstress(eunice, barbe)\nAccordant(rafaelita)\nWhack(rafaelita, barbe)\nOverstress(rafaelita, eunice)\nImpacted(barbe)\nAmebous(barbe)\nInterpret(barbe, eunice)\nWhack(barbe, rafaelita)\nOverstress(barbe, eunice)\nOverstress(barbe, rafaelita)\nforall x (Interpret(x, eunice) -> Interpret(eunice, barbe))\nforall x (Trousered(x) -> Interpret(x, rafaelita))\nforall x (Accordant(x) -> Whack(x, eunice))\nforall x (Whack(x, eunice) and Interpret(eunice, barbe) -> Interpret(x, eunice))\nInterpret(rafaelita, barbe) and Whack(barbe, rafaelita) -> Whack(rafaelita, barbe)\nforall x (Interpret(x, eunice) -> Interpret(x, rafaelita))\nInterpret(rafaelita, barbe) and Whack(barbe, eunice) -> Whack(barbe, rafaelita)\nforall x (Whack(x, rafaelita) -> Amebous(rafaelita))\n\nAmebous(rafaelita)\n\nWhack(barbe, rafaelita) and forall x (Whack(x, rafaelita) -> Amebous(rafaelita)) -> therefore Amebous(rafaelita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The andres is hatched. The andres apologize the dory. The andres apologize the rutter. The andres reassert the dory. The andres reassert the rutter. The andres calendar the dory. The andres calendar the rutter. The dory is amerciable. The dory reassert the rutter. The dory calendar the andres. The rutter is connate. The rutter is atomic. The rutter apologize the andres. The rutter reassert the dory. The rutter calendar the andres. The rutter calendar the dory. If something apologize the andres then the andres apologize the rutter. If something is very then it apologize the dory. If something is amerciable then it reassert the andres. If something reassert the andres and the andres apologize the rutter then it apologize the andres. If the dory apologize the rutter and the rutter reassert the dory then the dory reassert the rutter. If something apologize the andres then it apologize the dory. If the dory apologize the rutter and the rutter reassert the andres then the rutter reassert the dory. If something reassert the dory then the dory is atomic. The dory is not atomic.", "logic": "\nHatched(andres)\nApologize(andres, dory)\nApologize(andres, rutter)\nReassert(andres, dory)\nReassert(andres, rutter)\nCalendar(andres, dory)\nCalendar(andres, rutter)\nAmerciable(dory)\nReassert(dory, rutter)\nCalendar(dory, andres)\nConnate(rutter)\nAtomic(rutter)\nApologize(rutter, andres)\nReassert(rutter, dory)\nCalendar(rutter, andres)\nCalendar(rutter, dory)\nforall x (Apologize(x, andres) -> Apologize(andres, rutter))\nforall x (Very(x) -> Apologize(x, dory))\nforall x (Amerciable(x) -> Reassert(x, andres))\nforall x (Reassert(x, andres) and Apologize(andres, rutter) -> Apologize(x, andres))\nApologize(dory, rutter) and Reassert(rutter, dory) -> Reassert(dory, rutter)\nforall x (Apologize(x, andres) -> Apologize(x, dory))\nApologize(dory, rutter) and Reassert(rutter, andres) -> Reassert(rutter, dory)\nforall x (Reassert(x, dory) -> Atomic(dory))\n\nnot Atomic(dory)\n\nReassert(rutter, dory) and forall x (Reassert(x, dory) -> Atomic(dory)) -> therefore Atomic(dory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The harald is goosy. The harald emaciate the christal. The harald emaciate the carmita. The harald outbalance the christal. The harald outbalance the carmita. The harald posture the christal. The harald posture the carmita. The christal is sensual. The christal outbalance the carmita. The christal posture the harald. The carmita is carsick. The carmita is celestial. The carmita emaciate the harald. The carmita outbalance the christal. The carmita posture the harald. The carmita posture the christal. If something emaciate the harald then the harald emaciate the carmita. If something is starring then it emaciate the christal. If something is sensual then it outbalance the harald. If something outbalance the harald and the harald emaciate the carmita then it emaciate the harald. If the christal emaciate the carmita and the carmita outbalance the christal then the christal outbalance the carmita. If something emaciate the harald then it emaciate the christal. If the christal emaciate the carmita and the carmita outbalance the harald then the carmita outbalance the christal. If something outbalance the christal then the christal is celestial. The christal emaciate the harald.", "logic": "\nGoosy(harald)\nEmaciate(harald, christal)\nEmaciate(harald, carmita)\nOutbalance(harald, christal)\nOutbalance(harald, carmita)\nPosture(harald, christal)\nPosture(harald, carmita)\nSensual(christal)\nOutbalance(christal, carmita)\nPosture(christal, harald)\nCarsick(carmita)\nCelestial(carmita)\nEmaciate(carmita, harald)\nOutbalance(carmita, christal)\nPosture(carmita, harald)\nPosture(carmita, christal)\nforall x (Emaciate(x, harald) -> Emaciate(harald, carmita))\nforall x (Starring(x) -> Emaciate(x, christal))\nforall x (Sensual(x) -> Outbalance(x, harald))\nforall x (Outbalance(x, harald) and Emaciate(harald, carmita) -> Emaciate(x, harald))\nEmaciate(christal, carmita) and Outbalance(carmita, christal) -> Outbalance(christal, carmita)\nforall x (Emaciate(x, harald) -> Emaciate(x, christal))\nEmaciate(christal, carmita) and Outbalance(carmita, harald) -> Outbalance(carmita, christal)\nforall x (Outbalance(x, christal) -> Celestial(christal))\n\nEmaciate(christal, harald)\n\nSensual(christal) and forall x (Sensual(x) -> Outbalance(x, harald)) -> therefore Outbalance(christal, harald) Outbalance(christal, harald) and Emaciate(harald, carmita) and forall x (Outbalance(x, harald) and Emaciate(harald, carmita) -> Emaciate(x, harald)) -> therefore Emaciate(christal, harald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The ruperta is monotonous. The ruperta motley the daniel. The ruperta motley the murial. The ruperta coquette the daniel. The ruperta coquette the murial. The ruperta prop the daniel. The ruperta prop the murial. The daniel is staminate. The daniel coquette the murial. The daniel prop the ruperta. The murial is macabre. The murial is gilbertian. The murial motley the ruperta. The murial coquette the daniel. The murial prop the ruperta. The murial prop the daniel. If something motley the ruperta then the ruperta motley the murial. If something is goddamn then it motley the daniel. If something is staminate then it coquette the ruperta. If something coquette the ruperta and the ruperta motley the murial then it motley the ruperta. If the daniel motley the murial and the murial coquette the daniel then the daniel coquette the murial. If something motley the ruperta then it motley the daniel. If the daniel motley the murial and the murial coquette the ruperta then the murial coquette the daniel. If something coquette the daniel then the daniel is gilbertian. The daniel does not like the ruperta.", "logic": "\nMonotonous(ruperta)\nMotley(ruperta, daniel)\nMotley(ruperta, murial)\nCoquette(ruperta, daniel)\nCoquette(ruperta, murial)\nProp(ruperta, daniel)\nProp(ruperta, murial)\nStaminate(daniel)\nCoquette(daniel, murial)\nProp(daniel, ruperta)\nMacabre(murial)\nGilbertian(murial)\nMotley(murial, ruperta)\nCoquette(murial, daniel)\nProp(murial, ruperta)\nProp(murial, daniel)\nforall x (Motley(x, ruperta) -> Motley(ruperta, murial))\nforall x (Goddamn(x) -> Motley(x, daniel))\nforall x (Staminate(x) -> Coquette(x, ruperta))\nforall x (Coquette(x, ruperta) and Motley(ruperta, murial) -> Motley(x, ruperta))\nMotley(daniel, murial) and Coquette(murial, daniel) -> Coquette(daniel, murial)\nforall x (Motley(x, ruperta) -> Motley(x, daniel))\nMotley(daniel, murial) and Coquette(murial, ruperta) -> Coquette(murial, daniel)\nforall x (Coquette(x, daniel) -> Gilbertian(daniel))\n\nnot Motley(daniel, ruperta)\n\nStaminate(daniel) and forall x (Staminate(x) -> Coquette(x, ruperta)) -> therefore Coquette(daniel, ruperta) Coquette(daniel, ruperta) and Motley(ruperta, murial) and forall x (Coquette(x, ruperta) and Motley(ruperta, murial) -> Motley(x, ruperta)) -> therefore Motley(daniel, ruperta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The gonzalo is sculpted. The gonzalo titivate the ailyn. The gonzalo titivate the rowland. The gonzalo outlast the ailyn. The gonzalo outlast the rowland. The gonzalo glaciate the ailyn. The gonzalo glaciate the rowland. The ailyn is unfertile. The ailyn outlast the rowland. The ailyn glaciate the gonzalo. The rowland is semiannual. The rowland is prize. The rowland titivate the gonzalo. The rowland outlast the ailyn. The rowland glaciate the gonzalo. The rowland glaciate the ailyn. If something titivate the gonzalo then the gonzalo titivate the rowland. If something is astatic then it titivate the ailyn. If something is unfertile then it outlast the gonzalo. If something outlast the gonzalo and the gonzalo titivate the rowland then it titivate the gonzalo. If the ailyn titivate the rowland and the rowland outlast the ailyn then the ailyn outlast the rowland. If something titivate the gonzalo then it titivate the ailyn. If the ailyn titivate the rowland and the rowland outlast the gonzalo then the rowland outlast the ailyn. If something outlast the ailyn then the ailyn is prize. The ailyn titivate the ailyn.", "logic": "\nSculpted(gonzalo)\nTitivate(gonzalo, ailyn)\nTitivate(gonzalo, rowland)\nOutlast(gonzalo, ailyn)\nOutlast(gonzalo, rowland)\nGlaciate(gonzalo, ailyn)\nGlaciate(gonzalo, rowland)\nUnfertile(ailyn)\nOutlast(ailyn, rowland)\nGlaciate(ailyn, gonzalo)\nSemiannual(rowland)\nPrize(rowland)\nTitivate(rowland, gonzalo)\nOutlast(rowland, ailyn)\nGlaciate(rowland, gonzalo)\nGlaciate(rowland, ailyn)\nforall x (Titivate(x, gonzalo) -> Titivate(gonzalo, rowland))\nforall x (Astatic(x) -> Titivate(x, ailyn))\nforall x (Unfertile(x) -> Outlast(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Outlast(x, gonzalo) and Titivate(gonzalo, rowland) -> Titivate(x, gonzalo))\nTitivate(ailyn, rowland) and Outlast(rowland, ailyn) -> Outlast(ailyn, rowland)\nforall x (Titivate(x, gonzalo) -> Titivate(x, ailyn))\nTitivate(ailyn, rowland) and Outlast(rowland, gonzalo) -> Outlast(rowland, ailyn)\nforall x (Outlast(x, ailyn) -> Prize(ailyn))\n\nTitivate(ailyn, ailyn)\n\nUnfertile(ailyn) and forall x (Unfertile(x) -> Outlast(x, gonzalo)) -> therefore Outlast(ailyn, gonzalo) Outlast(ailyn, gonzalo) and Titivate(gonzalo, rowland) and forall x (Outlast(x, gonzalo) and Titivate(gonzalo, rowland) -> Titivate(x, gonzalo)) -> therefore Titivate(ailyn, gonzalo) Titivate(ailyn, gonzalo) and forall x (Titivate(x, gonzalo) -> Titivate(x, ailyn)) -> therefore Titivate(ailyn, ailyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The joe is dozy. The joe delete the katine. The joe delete the danna. The joe yearn the katine. The joe yearn the danna. The joe denitrify the katine. The joe denitrify the danna. The katine is chlorotic. The katine yearn the danna. The katine denitrify the joe. The danna is tottery. The danna is beguiled. The danna delete the joe. The danna yearn the katine. The danna denitrify the joe. The danna denitrify the katine. If something delete the joe then the joe delete the danna. If something is crippling then it delete the katine. If something is chlorotic then it yearn the joe. If something yearn the joe and the joe delete the danna then it delete the joe. If the katine delete the danna and the danna yearn the katine then the katine yearn the danna. If something delete the joe then it delete the katine. If the katine delete the danna and the danna yearn the joe then the danna yearn the katine. If something yearn the katine then the katine is beguiled. The katine does not like the katine.", "logic": "\nDozy(joe)\nDelete(joe, katine)\nDelete(joe, danna)\nYearn(joe, katine)\nYearn(joe, danna)\nDenitrify(joe, katine)\nDenitrify(joe, danna)\nChlorotic(katine)\nYearn(katine, danna)\nDenitrify(katine, joe)\nTottery(danna)\nBeguiled(danna)\nDelete(danna, joe)\nYearn(danna, katine)\nDenitrify(danna, joe)\nDenitrify(danna, katine)\nforall x (Delete(x, joe) -> Delete(joe, danna))\nforall x (Crippling(x) -> Delete(x, katine))\nforall x (Chlorotic(x) -> Yearn(x, joe))\nforall x (Yearn(x, joe) and Delete(joe, danna) -> Delete(x, joe))\nDelete(katine, danna) and Yearn(danna, katine) -> Yearn(katine, danna)\nforall x (Delete(x, joe) -> Delete(x, katine))\nDelete(katine, danna) and Yearn(danna, joe) -> Yearn(danna, katine)\nforall x (Yearn(x, katine) -> Beguiled(katine))\n\nnot Delete(katine, katine)\n\nChlorotic(katine) and forall x (Chlorotic(x) -> Yearn(x, joe)) -> therefore Yearn(katine, joe) Yearn(katine, joe) and Delete(joe, danna) and forall x (Yearn(x, joe) and Delete(joe, danna) -> Delete(x, joe)) -> therefore Delete(katine, joe) Delete(katine, joe) and forall x (Delete(x, joe) -> Delete(x, katine)) -> therefore Delete(katine, katine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The pammi is vulpine. The pammi tone the hestia. The pammi tone the albertine. The pammi lament the hestia. The pammi lament the albertine. The pammi backdate the hestia. The pammi backdate the albertine. The hestia is untrimmed. The hestia lament the albertine. The hestia backdate the pammi. The albertine is unloved. The albertine is watered. The albertine tone the pammi. The albertine lament the hestia. The albertine backdate the pammi. The albertine backdate the hestia. If something tone the pammi then the pammi tone the albertine. If something is plucked then it tone the hestia. If something is untrimmed then it lament the pammi. If something lament the pammi and the pammi tone the albertine then it tone the pammi. If the hestia tone the albertine and the albertine lament the hestia then the hestia lament the albertine. If something tone the pammi then it tone the hestia. If the hestia tone the albertine and the albertine lament the pammi then the albertine lament the hestia. If something lament the hestia then the hestia is watered. The albertine does not see the pammi.", "logic": "\nVulpine(pammi)\nTone(pammi, hestia)\nTone(pammi, albertine)\nLament(pammi, hestia)\nLament(pammi, albertine)\nBackdate(pammi, hestia)\nBackdate(pammi, albertine)\nUntrimmed(hestia)\nLament(hestia, albertine)\nBackdate(hestia, pammi)\nUnloved(albertine)\nWatered(albertine)\nTone(albertine, pammi)\nLament(albertine, hestia)\nBackdate(albertine, pammi)\nBackdate(albertine, hestia)\nforall x (Tone(x, pammi) -> Tone(pammi, albertine))\nforall x (Plucked(x) -> Tone(x, hestia))\nforall x (Untrimmed(x) -> Lament(x, pammi))\nforall x (Lament(x, pammi) and Tone(pammi, albertine) -> Tone(x, pammi))\nTone(hestia, albertine) and Lament(albertine, hestia) -> Lament(hestia, albertine)\nforall x (Tone(x, pammi) -> Tone(x, hestia))\nTone(hestia, albertine) and Lament(albertine, pammi) -> Lament(albertine, hestia)\nforall x (Lament(x, hestia) -> Watered(hestia))\n\nnot Lament(albertine, pammi)\n\nforall x (Untrimmed(x) -> Lament(x, pammi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The myrle is healthier. The myrle reacquaint the christ. The myrle reacquaint the aidan. The myrle devise the christ. The myrle devise the aidan. The myrle yawp the christ. The myrle yawp the aidan. The christ is turkish. The christ devise the aidan. The christ yawp the myrle. The aidan is corymbose. The aidan is silly. The aidan reacquaint the myrle. The aidan devise the christ. The aidan yawp the myrle. The aidan yawp the christ. If something reacquaint the myrle then the myrle reacquaint the aidan. If something is comical then it reacquaint the christ. If something is turkish then it devise the myrle. If something devise the myrle and the myrle reacquaint the aidan then it reacquaint the myrle. If the christ reacquaint the aidan and the aidan devise the christ then the christ devise the aidan. If something reacquaint the myrle then it reacquaint the christ. If the christ reacquaint the aidan and the aidan devise the myrle then the aidan devise the christ. If something devise the christ then the christ is silly. The myrle devise the myrle.", "logic": "\nHealthier(myrle)\nReacquaint(myrle, christ)\nReacquaint(myrle, aidan)\nDevise(myrle, christ)\nDevise(myrle, aidan)\nYawp(myrle, christ)\nYawp(myrle, aidan)\nTurkish(christ)\nDevise(christ, aidan)\nYawp(christ, myrle)\nCorymbose(aidan)\nSilly(aidan)\nReacquaint(aidan, myrle)\nDevise(aidan, christ)\nYawp(aidan, myrle)\nYawp(aidan, christ)\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, myrle) -> Reacquaint(myrle, aidan))\nforall x (Comical(x) -> Reacquaint(x, christ))\nforall x (Turkish(x) -> Devise(x, myrle))\nforall x (Devise(x, myrle) and Reacquaint(myrle, aidan) -> Reacquaint(x, myrle))\nReacquaint(christ, aidan) and Devise(aidan, christ) -> Devise(christ, aidan)\nforall x (Reacquaint(x, myrle) -> Reacquaint(x, christ))\nReacquaint(christ, aidan) and Devise(aidan, myrle) -> Devise(aidan, christ)\nforall x (Devise(x, christ) -> Silly(christ))\n\nDevise(myrle, myrle)\n\nforall x (Turkish(x) -> Devise(x, myrle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The waylon is glimmery. The waylon redline the tate. The waylon redline the kariotta. The waylon glut the tate. The waylon glut the kariotta. The waylon bestialize the tate. The waylon bestialize the kariotta. The tate is mnemonic. The tate glut the kariotta. The tate bestialize the waylon. The kariotta is piggish. The kariotta is porose. The kariotta redline the waylon. The kariotta glut the tate. The kariotta bestialize the waylon. The kariotta bestialize the tate. If something redline the waylon then the waylon redline the kariotta. If something is incased then it redline the tate. If something is mnemonic then it glut the waylon. If something glut the waylon and the waylon redline the kariotta then it redline the waylon. If the tate redline the kariotta and the kariotta glut the tate then the tate glut the kariotta. If something redline the waylon then it redline the tate. If the tate redline the kariotta and the kariotta glut the waylon then the kariotta glut the tate. If something glut the tate then the tate is porose. The waylon does not like the waylon.", "logic": "\nGlimmery(waylon)\nRedline(waylon, tate)\nRedline(waylon, kariotta)\nGlut(waylon, tate)\nGlut(waylon, kariotta)\nBestialize(waylon, tate)\nBestialize(waylon, kariotta)\nMnemonic(tate)\nGlut(tate, kariotta)\nBestialize(tate, waylon)\nPiggish(kariotta)\nPorose(kariotta)\nRedline(kariotta, waylon)\nGlut(kariotta, tate)\nBestialize(kariotta, waylon)\nBestialize(kariotta, tate)\nforall x (Redline(x, waylon) -> Redline(waylon, kariotta))\nforall x (Incased(x) -> Redline(x, tate))\nforall x (Mnemonic(x) -> Glut(x, waylon))\nforall x (Glut(x, waylon) and Redline(waylon, kariotta) -> Redline(x, waylon))\nRedline(tate, kariotta) and Glut(kariotta, tate) -> Glut(tate, kariotta)\nforall x (Redline(x, waylon) -> Redline(x, tate))\nRedline(tate, kariotta) and Glut(kariotta, waylon) -> Glut(kariotta, tate)\nforall x (Glut(x, tate) -> Porose(tate))\n\nnot Redline(waylon, waylon)\n\nforall x (Glut(x, waylon) and Redline(waylon, kariotta) -> Redline(x, waylon)) <- forall x (Mnemonic(x) -> Glut(x, waylon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The nathaniel is attenuate. The nathaniel dismount the blondie. The nathaniel dismount the rourke. The nathaniel remit the blondie. The nathaniel remit the rourke. The nathaniel hobble the blondie. The nathaniel hobble the rourke. The blondie is tahitian. The blondie remit the rourke. The blondie hobble the nathaniel. The rourke is untrusting. The rourke is middlemost. The rourke dismount the nathaniel. The rourke remit the blondie. The rourke hobble the nathaniel. The rourke hobble the blondie. If something dismount the nathaniel then the nathaniel dismount the rourke. If something is runcinate then it dismount the blondie. If something is tahitian then it remit the nathaniel. If something remit the nathaniel and the nathaniel dismount the rourke then it dismount the nathaniel. If the blondie dismount the rourke and the rourke remit the blondie then the blondie remit the rourke. If something dismount the nathaniel then it dismount the blondie. If the blondie dismount the rourke and the rourke remit the nathaniel then the rourke remit the blondie. If something remit the blondie then the blondie is middlemost. The rourke dismount the rourke.", "logic": "\nAttenuate(nathaniel)\nDismount(nathaniel, blondie)\nDismount(nathaniel, rourke)\nRemit(nathaniel, blondie)\nRemit(nathaniel, rourke)\nHobble(nathaniel, blondie)\nHobble(nathaniel, rourke)\nTahitian(blondie)\nRemit(blondie, rourke)\nHobble(blondie, nathaniel)\nUntrusting(rourke)\nMiddlemost(rourke)\nDismount(rourke, nathaniel)\nRemit(rourke, blondie)\nHobble(rourke, nathaniel)\nHobble(rourke, blondie)\nforall x (Dismount(x, nathaniel) -> Dismount(nathaniel, rourke))\nforall x (Runcinate(x) -> Dismount(x, blondie))\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> Remit(x, nathaniel))\nforall x (Remit(x, nathaniel) and Dismount(nathaniel, rourke) -> Dismount(x, nathaniel))\nDismount(blondie, rourke) and Remit(rourke, blondie) -> Remit(blondie, rourke)\nforall x (Dismount(x, nathaniel) -> Dismount(x, blondie))\nDismount(blondie, rourke) and Remit(rourke, nathaniel) -> Remit(rourke, blondie)\nforall x (Remit(x, blondie) -> Middlemost(blondie))\n\nDismount(rourke, rourke)\n\nDismount(rourke, rourke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The web is straplike. The web welcome the reeta. The web welcome the angeline. The web cripple the reeta. The web cripple the angeline. The web consist the reeta. The web consist the angeline. The reeta is nascent. The reeta cripple the angeline. The reeta consist the web. The angeline is contrived. The angeline is squeamish. The angeline welcome the web. The angeline cripple the reeta. The angeline consist the web. The angeline consist the reeta. If something welcome the web then the web welcome the angeline. If something is asunder then it welcome the reeta. If something is nascent then it cripple the web. If something cripple the web and the web welcome the angeline then it welcome the web. If the reeta welcome the angeline and the angeline cripple the reeta then the reeta cripple the angeline. If something welcome the web then it welcome the reeta. If the reeta welcome the angeline and the angeline cripple the web then the angeline cripple the reeta. If something cripple the reeta then the reeta is squeamish. The reeta does not visit the reeta.", "logic": "\nStraplike(web)\nWelcome(web, reeta)\nWelcome(web, angeline)\nCripple(web, reeta)\nCripple(web, angeline)\nConsist(web, reeta)\nConsist(web, angeline)\nNascent(reeta)\nCripple(reeta, angeline)\nConsist(reeta, web)\nContrived(angeline)\nSqueamish(angeline)\nWelcome(angeline, web)\nCripple(angeline, reeta)\nConsist(angeline, web)\nConsist(angeline, reeta)\nforall x (Welcome(x, web) -> Welcome(web, angeline))\nforall x (Asunder(x) -> Welcome(x, reeta))\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> Cripple(x, web))\nforall x (Cripple(x, web) and Welcome(web, angeline) -> Welcome(x, web))\nWelcome(reeta, angeline) and Cripple(angeline, reeta) -> Cripple(reeta, angeline)\nforall x (Welcome(x, web) -> Welcome(x, reeta))\nWelcome(reeta, angeline) and Cripple(angeline, web) -> Cripple(angeline, reeta)\nforall x (Cripple(x, reeta) -> Squeamish(reeta))\n\nnot Consist(reeta, reeta)\n\nnot Consist(reeta, reeta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The marris is tenuous. The marris chemisorb the dulcea. The marris chemisorb the pavia. The marris whisker the dulcea. The marris whisker the pavia. The marris derive the dulcea. The marris derive the pavia. The dulcea is coagulated. The dulcea whisker the pavia. The dulcea derive the marris. The pavia is unabused. The pavia is scrubbed. The pavia chemisorb the marris. The pavia whisker the dulcea. The pavia derive the marris. The pavia derive the dulcea. If something chemisorb the marris then the marris chemisorb the pavia. If something is erasable then it chemisorb the dulcea. If something is coagulated then it whisker the marris. If something whisker the marris and the marris chemisorb the pavia then it chemisorb the marris. If the dulcea chemisorb the pavia and the pavia whisker the dulcea then the dulcea whisker the pavia. If something chemisorb the marris then it chemisorb the dulcea. If the dulcea chemisorb the pavia and the pavia whisker the marris then the pavia whisker the dulcea. If something whisker the dulcea then the dulcea is scrubbed. The marris is scrubbed.", "logic": "\nTenuous(marris)\nChemisorb(marris, dulcea)\nChemisorb(marris, pavia)\nWhisker(marris, dulcea)\nWhisker(marris, pavia)\nDerive(marris, dulcea)\nDerive(marris, pavia)\nCoagulated(dulcea)\nWhisker(dulcea, pavia)\nDerive(dulcea, marris)\nUnabused(pavia)\nScrubbed(pavia)\nChemisorb(pavia, marris)\nWhisker(pavia, dulcea)\nDerive(pavia, marris)\nDerive(pavia, dulcea)\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, marris) -> Chemisorb(marris, pavia))\nforall x (Erasable(x) -> Chemisorb(x, dulcea))\nforall x (Coagulated(x) -> Whisker(x, marris))\nforall x (Whisker(x, marris) and Chemisorb(marris, pavia) -> Chemisorb(x, marris))\nChemisorb(dulcea, pavia) and Whisker(pavia, dulcea) -> Whisker(dulcea, pavia)\nforall x (Chemisorb(x, marris) -> Chemisorb(x, dulcea))\nChemisorb(dulcea, pavia) and Whisker(pavia, marris) -> Whisker(pavia, dulcea)\nforall x (Whisker(x, dulcea) -> Scrubbed(dulcea))\n\nScrubbed(marris)\n\nScrubbed(marris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The pierre is unbordered. The pierre drone the marcille. The pierre drone the mitch. The pierre balloon the marcille. The pierre balloon the mitch. The pierre coke the marcille. The pierre coke the mitch. The marcille is weaponed. The marcille balloon the mitch. The marcille coke the pierre. The mitch is edifying. The mitch is unforeseen. The mitch drone the pierre. The mitch balloon the marcille. The mitch coke the pierre. The mitch coke the marcille. If something drone the pierre then the pierre drone the mitch. If something is colorful then it drone the marcille. If something is weaponed then it balloon the pierre. If something balloon the pierre and the pierre drone the mitch then it drone the pierre. If the marcille drone the mitch and the mitch balloon the marcille then the marcille balloon the mitch. If something drone the pierre then it drone the marcille. If the marcille drone the mitch and the mitch balloon the pierre then the mitch balloon the marcille. If something balloon the marcille then the marcille is unforeseen. The pierre is not edifying.", "logic": "\nUnbordered(pierre)\nDrone(pierre, marcille)\nDrone(pierre, mitch)\nBalloon(pierre, marcille)\nBalloon(pierre, mitch)\nCoke(pierre, marcille)\nCoke(pierre, mitch)\nWeaponed(marcille)\nBalloon(marcille, mitch)\nCoke(marcille, pierre)\nEdifying(mitch)\nUnforeseen(mitch)\nDrone(mitch, pierre)\nBalloon(mitch, marcille)\nCoke(mitch, pierre)\nCoke(mitch, marcille)\nforall x (Drone(x, pierre) -> Drone(pierre, mitch))\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Drone(x, marcille))\nforall x (Weaponed(x) -> Balloon(x, pierre))\nforall x (Balloon(x, pierre) and Drone(pierre, mitch) -> Drone(x, pierre))\nDrone(marcille, mitch) and Balloon(mitch, marcille) -> Balloon(marcille, mitch)\nforall x (Drone(x, pierre) -> Drone(x, marcille))\nDrone(marcille, mitch) and Balloon(mitch, pierre) -> Balloon(mitch, marcille)\nforall x (Balloon(x, marcille) -> Unforeseen(marcille))\n\nnot Edifying(pierre)\n\nnot Edifying(pierre) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "The carlen is adept. The carlen bombilate the bernhard. The carlen bombilate the berny. The carlen alien the bernhard. The carlen alien the berny. The carlen sharpshoot the bernhard. The carlen sharpshoot the berny. The bernhard is amalgamate. The bernhard alien the berny. The bernhard sharpshoot the carlen. The berny is armed. The berny is botswanan. The berny bombilate the carlen. The berny alien the bernhard. The berny sharpshoot the carlen. The berny sharpshoot the bernhard. If something bombilate the carlen then the carlen bombilate the berny. If something is equipoised then it bombilate the bernhard. If something is amalgamate then it alien the carlen. If something alien the carlen and the carlen bombilate the berny then it bombilate the carlen. If the bernhard bombilate the berny and the berny alien the bernhard then the bernhard alien the berny. If something bombilate the carlen then it bombilate the bernhard. If the bernhard bombilate the berny and the berny alien the carlen then the berny alien the bernhard. If something alien the bernhard then the bernhard is botswanan. The berny is amalgamate.", "logic": "\nAdept(carlen)\nBombilate(carlen, bernhard)\nBombilate(carlen, berny)\nAlien(carlen, bernhard)\nAlien(carlen, berny)\nSharpshoot(carlen, bernhard)\nSharpshoot(carlen, berny)\nAmalgamate(bernhard)\nAlien(bernhard, berny)\nSharpshoot(bernhard, carlen)\nArmed(berny)\nBotswanan(berny)\nBombilate(berny, carlen)\nAlien(berny, bernhard)\nSharpshoot(berny, carlen)\nSharpshoot(berny, bernhard)\nforall x (Bombilate(x, carlen) -> Bombilate(carlen, berny))\nforall x (Equipoised(x) -> Bombilate(x, bernhard))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x) -> Alien(x, carlen))\nforall x (Alien(x, carlen) and Bombilate(carlen, berny) -> Bombilate(x, carlen))\nBombilate(bernhard, berny) and Alien(berny, bernhard) -> Alien(bernhard, berny)\nforall x (Bombilate(x, carlen) -> Bombilate(x, bernhard))\nBombilate(bernhard, berny) and Alien(berny, carlen) -> Alien(berny, bernhard)\nforall x (Alien(x, bernhard) -> Botswanan(bernhard))\n\nAmalgamate(berny)\n\nAmalgamate(berny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-657"} {"premises": "Terrance is enhancive. Terrance is mongoloid. Terrance is yelled. All tubal, nazarene things are enhancive. All umpteen things are mongoloid. If Terrance is umpteen then Terrance is nazarene. Young, nazarene things are tubal. All mongoloid things are nazarene. If Terrance is tubal and Terrance is enhancive then Terrance is opencut. Terrance is yelled.", "logic": "\nEnhancive(terrance)\nMongoloid(terrance)\nYelled(terrance)\nforall x (Tubal(x) and Nazarene(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Mongoloid(x))\nUmpteen(terrance) -> Nazarene(terrance)\nforall x (Yelled(x) and Nazarene(x) -> Tubal(x))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Nazarene(x))\nTubal(terrance) and Enhancive(terrance) -> Opencut(terrance)\n\nYelled(terrance)\n\ntherefore Yelled(terrance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Gibb is mindless. Gibb is churlish. Gibb is woolly. All querulous, clad things are mindless. All puzzled things are churlish. If Gibb is puzzled then Gibb is clad. Young, clad things are querulous. All churlish things are clad. If Gibb is querulous and Gibb is mindless then Gibb is eternal. Gibb is not woolly.", "logic": "\nMindless(gibb)\nChurlish(gibb)\nWoolly(gibb)\nforall x (Querulous(x) and Clad(x) -> Mindless(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Churlish(x))\nPuzzled(gibb) -> Clad(gibb)\nforall x (Woolly(x) and Clad(x) -> Querulous(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) -> Clad(x))\nQuerulous(gibb) and Mindless(gibb) -> Eternal(gibb)\n\nnot Woolly(gibb)\n\ntherefore Woolly(gibb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Flossy is anaphoric. Flossy is curvey. Flossy is uncoated. All berried, unstated things are anaphoric. All flowerless things are curvey. If Flossy is flowerless then Flossy is unstated. Young, unstated things are berried. All curvey things are unstated. If Flossy is berried and Flossy is anaphoric then Flossy is slippery. Flossy is unstated.", "logic": "\nAnaphoric(flossy)\nCurvey(flossy)\nUncoated(flossy)\nforall x (Berried(x) and Unstated(x) -> Anaphoric(x))\nforall x (Flowerless(x) -> Curvey(x))\nFlowerless(flossy) -> Unstated(flossy)\nforall x (Uncoated(x) and Unstated(x) -> Berried(x))\nforall x (Curvey(x) -> Unstated(x))\nBerried(flossy) and Anaphoric(flossy) -> Slippery(flossy)\n\nUnstated(flossy)\n\nCurvey(flossy) and forall x (Curvey(x) -> Unstated(x)) -> therefore Unstated(flossy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Marabel is varicose. Marabel is implicated. Marabel is barreled. All injurious, isthmian things are varicose. All arrayed things are implicated. If Marabel is arrayed then Marabel is isthmian. Young, isthmian things are injurious. All implicated things are isthmian. If Marabel is injurious and Marabel is varicose then Marabel is provisory. Marabel is not isthmian.", "logic": "\nVaricose(marabel)\nImplicated(marabel)\nBarreled(marabel)\nforall x (Injurious(x) and Isthmian(x) -> Varicose(x))\nforall x (Arrayed(x) -> Implicated(x))\nArrayed(marabel) -> Isthmian(marabel)\nforall x (Barreled(x) and Isthmian(x) -> Injurious(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nInjurious(marabel) and Varicose(marabel) -> Provisory(marabel)\n\nnot Isthmian(marabel)\n\nImplicated(marabel) and forall x (Implicated(x) -> Isthmian(x)) -> therefore Isthmian(marabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Hammad is demeaning. Hammad is cellular. Hammad is searing. All unbridled, copesetic things are demeaning. All unlisted things are cellular. If Hammad is unlisted then Hammad is copesetic. Young, copesetic things are unbridled. All cellular things are copesetic. If Hammad is unbridled and Hammad is demeaning then Hammad is comforting. Hammad is unbridled.", "logic": "\nDemeaning(hammad)\nCellular(hammad)\nSearing(hammad)\nforall x (Unbridled(x) and Copesetic(x) -> Demeaning(x))\nforall x (Unlisted(x) -> Cellular(x))\nUnlisted(hammad) -> Copesetic(hammad)\nforall x (Searing(x) and Copesetic(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nforall x (Cellular(x) -> Copesetic(x))\nUnbridled(hammad) and Demeaning(hammad) -> Comforting(hammad)\n\nUnbridled(hammad)\n\nCellular(hammad) and forall x (Cellular(x) -> Copesetic(x)) -> therefore Copesetic(hammad) Searing(hammad) and Copesetic(hammad) and forall x (Searing(x) and Copesetic(x) -> Unbridled(x)) -> therefore Unbridled(hammad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Reinhard is cagy. Reinhard is lxxi. Reinhard is unlawful. All unarmored, eventful things are cagy. All alternate things are lxxi. If Reinhard is alternate then Reinhard is eventful. Young, eventful things are unarmored. All lxxi things are eventful. If Reinhard is unarmored and Reinhard is cagy then Reinhard is essene. Reinhard is not unarmored.", "logic": "\nCagy(reinhard)\nLxxi(reinhard)\nUnlawful(reinhard)\nforall x (Unarmored(x) and Eventful(x) -> Cagy(x))\nforall x (Alternate(x) -> Lxxi(x))\nAlternate(reinhard) -> Eventful(reinhard)\nforall x (Unlawful(x) and Eventful(x) -> Unarmored(x))\nforall x (Lxxi(x) -> Eventful(x))\nUnarmored(reinhard) and Cagy(reinhard) -> Essene(reinhard)\n\nnot Unarmored(reinhard)\n\nLxxi(reinhard) and forall x (Lxxi(x) -> Eventful(x)) -> therefore Eventful(reinhard) Unlawful(reinhard) and Eventful(reinhard) and forall x (Unlawful(x) and Eventful(x) -> Unarmored(x)) -> therefore Unarmored(reinhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Auberta is unmatched. Auberta is despotic. Auberta is genteel. All trillion, depilatory things are unmatched. All genital things are despotic. If Auberta is genital then Auberta is depilatory. Young, depilatory things are trillion. All despotic things are depilatory. If Auberta is trillion and Auberta is unmatched then Auberta is tractable. Auberta is tractable.", "logic": "\nUnmatched(auberta)\nDespotic(auberta)\nGenteel(auberta)\nforall x (Trillion(x) and Depilatory(x) -> Unmatched(x))\nforall x (Genital(x) -> Despotic(x))\nGenital(auberta) -> Depilatory(auberta)\nforall x (Genteel(x) and Depilatory(x) -> Trillion(x))\nforall x (Despotic(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nTrillion(auberta) and Unmatched(auberta) -> Tractable(auberta)\n\nTractable(auberta)\n\nDespotic(auberta) and forall x (Despotic(x) -> Depilatory(x)) -> therefore Depilatory(auberta) Genteel(auberta) and Depilatory(auberta) and forall x (Genteel(x) and Depilatory(x) -> Trillion(x)) -> therefore Trillion(auberta) Trillion(auberta) and Unmatched(auberta) and Trillion(auberta) and Unmatched(auberta) -> Tractable(auberta) -> therefore Tractable(auberta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Merla is striking. Merla is skinless. Merla is satiric. All arco, brushed things are striking. All vehicular things are skinless. If Merla is vehicular then Merla is brushed. Young, brushed things are arco. All skinless things are brushed. If Merla is arco and Merla is striking then Merla is stumpy. Merla is not stumpy.", "logic": "\nStriking(merla)\nSkinless(merla)\nSatiric(merla)\nforall x (Arco(x) and Brushed(x) -> Striking(x))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) -> Skinless(x))\nVehicular(merla) -> Brushed(merla)\nforall x (Satiric(x) and Brushed(x) -> Arco(x))\nforall x (Skinless(x) -> Brushed(x))\nArco(merla) and Striking(merla) -> Stumpy(merla)\n\nnot Stumpy(merla)\n\nSkinless(merla) and forall x (Skinless(x) -> Brushed(x)) -> therefore Brushed(merla) Satiric(merla) and Brushed(merla) and forall x (Satiric(x) and Brushed(x) -> Arco(x)) -> therefore Arco(merla) Arco(merla) and Striking(merla) and Arco(merla) and Striking(merla) -> Stumpy(merla) -> therefore Stumpy(merla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1233"} {"premises": "Vikki is tiered. Ferdie is tiered. Dina is lamarckian. If Vikki is glaucous and Vikki is blessed then Vikki is botanic. If Vikki is botanic and Vikki is lamarckian then Vikki is glaucous. Vikki is tiered.", "logic": "\nTiered(vikki)\nTiered(ferdie)\nLamarckian(dina)\nGlaucous(vikki) and Blessed(vikki) -> Botanic(vikki)\nBotanic(vikki) and Lamarckian(vikki) -> Glaucous(vikki)\n\nTiered(vikki)\n\ntherefore Tiered(vikki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3176"} {"premises": "Alvinia is acerbic. Lurleen is acerbic. Kally is septrional. If Alvinia is reviving and Alvinia is unleaded then Alvinia is confident. If Alvinia is confident and Alvinia is septrional then Alvinia is reviving. Kally is not septrional.", "logic": "\nAcerbic(alvinia)\nAcerbic(lurleen)\nSeptrional(kally)\nReviving(alvinia) and Unleaded(alvinia) -> Confident(alvinia)\nConfident(alvinia) and Septrional(alvinia) -> Reviving(alvinia)\n\nnot Septrional(kally)\n\ntherefore Septrional(kally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3176"} {"premises": "Caril is crinoid. Kirk is crinoid. Chen is worst. If Caril is dissoluble and Caril is rounded then Caril is synoptic. If Caril is synoptic and Caril is worst then Caril is dissoluble. Caril is not synoptic.", "logic": "\nCrinoid(caril)\nCrinoid(kirk)\nWorst(chen)\nDissoluble(caril) and Rounded(caril) -> Synoptic(caril)\nSynoptic(caril) and Worst(caril) -> Dissoluble(caril)\n\nnot Synoptic(caril)\n\nDissoluble(caril) and Rounded(caril) -> Synoptic(caril) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3176"} {"premises": "Diena is yellow. Bekki is yellow. Gaston is unedited. If Diena is inaudible and Diena is activated then Diena is browned. If Diena is browned and Diena is unedited then Diena is inaudible. Gaston is furry.", "logic": "\nYellow(diena)\nYellow(bekki)\nUnedited(gaston)\nInaudible(diena) and Activated(diena) -> Browned(diena)\nBrowned(diena) and Unedited(diena) -> Inaudible(diena)\n\nFurry(gaston)\n\nFurry(gaston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3176"} {"premises": "Brear is upset. Brear is resolved. Skyler is upset. Orsola is homonymous. Randall is rear. Randall is resolved. Randall is homonymous. Big things are resolved. If something is resolved then it is voltarean. Round, voltarean things are rear. Randall is resolved.", "logic": "\nUpset(brear)\nResolved(brear)\nUpset(skyler)\nHomonymous(orsola)\nRear(randall)\nResolved(randall)\nHomonymous(randall)\nforall x (Coastal(x) -> Resolved(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Voltarean(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) and Voltarean(x) -> Rear(x))\n\nResolved(randall)\n\ntherefore Resolved(randall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Mufi is wanton. Mufi is mundane. Lurleen is wanton. Woodrow is ecumenic. Tanya is dormant. Tanya is mundane. Tanya is ecumenic. Big things are mundane. If something is mundane then it is toothsome. Round, toothsome things are dormant. Tanya is not mundane.", "logic": "\nWanton(mufi)\nMundane(mufi)\nWanton(lurleen)\nEcumenic(woodrow)\nDormant(tanya)\nMundane(tanya)\nEcumenic(tanya)\nforall x (Peptic(x) -> Mundane(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) -> Toothsome(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) and Toothsome(x) -> Dormant(x))\n\nnot Mundane(tanya)\n\ntherefore Mundane(tanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Alysia is dynamic. Alysia is wizardly. Clarance is dynamic. Jennifer is dickensian. Dimitrou is zillion. Dimitrou is wizardly. Dimitrou is dickensian. Big things are wizardly. If something is wizardly then it is geothermic. Round, geothermic things are zillion. Dimitrou is geothermic.", "logic": "\nDynamic(alysia)\nWizardly(alysia)\nDynamic(clarance)\nDickensian(jennifer)\nZillion(dimitrou)\nWizardly(dimitrou)\nDickensian(dimitrou)\nforall x (Mediated(x) -> Wizardly(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) -> Geothermic(x))\nforall x (Wizardly(x) and Geothermic(x) -> Zillion(x))\n\nGeothermic(dimitrou)\n\nWizardly(dimitrou) and forall x (Wizardly(x) -> Geothermic(x)) -> therefore Geothermic(dimitrou)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Cybil is perpetual. Cybil is valorous. Pasquale is perpetual. Tiana is stemmed. Antonina is craved. Antonina is valorous. Antonina is stemmed. Big things are valorous. If something is valorous then it is sneering. Round, sneering things are craved. Antonina is not sneering.", "logic": "\nPerpetual(cybil)\nValorous(cybil)\nPerpetual(pasquale)\nStemmed(tiana)\nCraved(antonina)\nValorous(antonina)\nStemmed(antonina)\nforall x (Bolshy(x) -> Valorous(x))\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> Sneering(x))\nforall x (Valorous(x) and Sneering(x) -> Craved(x))\n\nnot Sneering(antonina)\n\nValorous(antonina) and forall x (Valorous(x) -> Sneering(x)) -> therefore Sneering(antonina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Leanne is fenestral. Leanne is epitheliod. Carla is fenestral. Iseabal is divorced. Sim is dynastic. Sim is epitheliod. Sim is divorced. Big things are epitheliod. If something is epitheliod then it is torrid. Round, torrid things are dynastic. Leanne is dynastic.", "logic": "\nFenestral(leanne)\nEpitheliod(leanne)\nFenestral(carla)\nDivorced(iseabal)\nDynastic(sim)\nEpitheliod(sim)\nDivorced(sim)\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Epitheliod(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Torrid(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) and Torrid(x) -> Dynastic(x))\n\nDynastic(leanne)\n\nEpitheliod(leanne) and forall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Torrid(x)) -> therefore Torrid(leanne) Epitheliod(leanne) and Torrid(leanne) and forall x (Epitheliod(x) and Torrid(x) -> Dynastic(x)) -> therefore Dynastic(leanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Tulley is consonant. Tulley is guiding. Margot is consonant. Marika is bohemian. Debi is relaxed. Debi is guiding. Debi is bohemian. Big things are guiding. If something is guiding then it is muddy. Round, muddy things are relaxed. Tulley is not relaxed.", "logic": "\nConsonant(tulley)\nGuiding(tulley)\nConsonant(margot)\nBohemian(marika)\nRelaxed(debi)\nGuiding(debi)\nBohemian(debi)\nforall x (Transpolar(x) -> Guiding(x))\nforall x (Guiding(x) -> Muddy(x))\nforall x (Guiding(x) and Muddy(x) -> Relaxed(x))\n\nnot Relaxed(tulley)\n\nGuiding(tulley) and forall x (Guiding(x) -> Muddy(x)) -> therefore Muddy(tulley) Guiding(tulley) and Muddy(tulley) and forall x (Guiding(x) and Muddy(x) -> Relaxed(x)) -> therefore Relaxed(tulley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Marcello is bustling. Marcello is downy. Amelia is bustling. Harriott is pardonable. Adelind is bulblike. Adelind is downy. Adelind is pardonable. Big things are downy. If something is downy then it is encrusted. Round, encrusted things are bulblike. Harriott is not bulblike.", "logic": "\nBustling(marcello)\nDowny(marcello)\nBustling(amelia)\nPardonable(harriott)\nBulblike(adelind)\nDowny(adelind)\nPardonable(adelind)\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> Downy(x))\nforall x (Downy(x) -> Encrusted(x))\nforall x (Downy(x) and Encrusted(x) -> Bulblike(x))\n\nnot Bulblike(harriott)\n\nforall x (Downy(x) and Encrusted(x) -> Bulblike(x)) <- forall x (Enamored(x) -> Downy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Romain is bended. Romain is miscible. Jonathon is bended. Apollo is superb. Augusta is pessimum. Augusta is miscible. Augusta is superb. Big things are miscible. If something is miscible then it is pathetic. Round, pathetic things are pessimum. Jonathon is miscible.", "logic": "\nBended(romain)\nMiscible(romain)\nBended(jonathon)\nSuperb(apollo)\nPessimum(augusta)\nMiscible(augusta)\nSuperb(augusta)\nforall x (Vanilla(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Miscible(x) -> Pathetic(x))\nforall x (Miscible(x) and Pathetic(x) -> Pessimum(x))\n\nMiscible(jonathon)\n\nforall x (Vanilla(x) -> Miscible(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Benjamen is boundless. Benjamen is centered. Guenevere is boundless. Marjy is ellipsoid. Roxanne is envisioned. Roxanne is centered. Roxanne is ellipsoid. Big things are centered. If something is centered then it is septrional. Round, septrional things are envisioned. Guenevere is not envisioned.", "logic": "\nBoundless(benjamen)\nCentered(benjamen)\nBoundless(guenevere)\nEllipsoid(marjy)\nEnvisioned(roxanne)\nCentered(roxanne)\nEllipsoid(roxanne)\nforall x (Disquieted(x) -> Centered(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) -> Septrional(x))\nforall x (Centered(x) and Septrional(x) -> Envisioned(x))\n\nnot Envisioned(guenevere)\n\nforall x (Centered(x) and Septrional(x) -> Envisioned(x)) <- forall x (Disquieted(x) -> Centered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Doralia is foliate. Doralia is correlated. Frederica is foliate. Coleen is mystified. Gardener is uppercase. Gardener is correlated. Gardener is mystified. Big things are correlated. If something is correlated then it is sorcerous. Round, sorcerous things are uppercase. Coleen is foliate.", "logic": "\nFoliate(doralia)\nCorrelated(doralia)\nFoliate(frederica)\nMystified(coleen)\nUppercase(gardener)\nCorrelated(gardener)\nMystified(gardener)\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Correlated(x))\nforall x (Correlated(x) -> Sorcerous(x))\nforall x (Correlated(x) and Sorcerous(x) -> Uppercase(x))\n\nFoliate(coleen)\n\nFoliate(coleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Emili is crushing. Emili is meaty. Brigit is crushing. Gunilla is bandy. Jesus is cambodian. Jesus is meaty. Jesus is bandy. Big things are meaty. If something is meaty then it is beamish. Round, beamish things are cambodian. Brigit is not quiet.", "logic": "\nCrushing(emili)\nMeaty(emili)\nCrushing(brigit)\nBandy(gunilla)\nCambodian(jesus)\nMeaty(jesus)\nBandy(jesus)\nforall x (Donnean(x) -> Meaty(x))\nforall x (Meaty(x) -> Beamish(x))\nforall x (Meaty(x) and Beamish(x) -> Cambodian(x))\n\nnot Quiet(brigit)\n\nnot Quiet(brigit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Wallace is parrotlike. Wallace is wireless. Weidar is parrotlike. Desiri is beaded. Ventura is arawakan. Ventura is wireless. Ventura is beaded. Big things are wireless. If something is wireless then it is sexless. Round, sexless things are arawakan. Wallace is quiet.", "logic": "\nParrotlike(wallace)\nWireless(wallace)\nParrotlike(weidar)\nBeaded(desiri)\nArawakan(ventura)\nWireless(ventura)\nBeaded(ventura)\nforall x (Pillared(x) -> Wireless(x))\nforall x (Wireless(x) -> Sexless(x))\nforall x (Wireless(x) and Sexless(x) -> Arawakan(x))\n\nQuiet(wallace)\n\nQuiet(wallace) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1655"} {"premises": "Sharla is inert. Sharla is squinched. Sharla is not credal. Sharla is homebound. Chaddy is inert. Chaddy is credal. Chaddy is cardinal. Nice things are unwilled. All credal, unwilled things are cardinal. If Chaddy is inert and Chaddy is homebound then Chaddy is cardinal. If something is inert and not unwilled then it is fissile. All unwilled things are fissile. If something is unwilled and fissile then it is squinched. All homebound things are squinched. If something is homebound then it is squinched. Chaddy is credal.", "logic": "\nInert(sharla)\nSquinched(sharla)\nnot Credal(sharla)\nHomebound(sharla)\nInert(chaddy)\nCredal(chaddy)\nCardinal(chaddy)\nforall x (Credal(x) -> Unwilled(x))\nforall x (Credal(x) and Unwilled(x) -> Cardinal(x))\nInert(chaddy) and Homebound(chaddy) -> Cardinal(chaddy)\nforall x (Inert(x) and not Unwilled(x) -> Fissile(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) -> Fissile(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and Fissile(x) -> Squinched(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Squinched(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) -> Squinched(x))\n\nCredal(chaddy)\n\ntherefore Credal(chaddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Emanuela is guarded. Emanuela is approving. Emanuela is not unsanitary. Emanuela is sufficient. Travis is guarded. Travis is unsanitary. Travis is moresque. Nice things are surmounted. All unsanitary, surmounted things are moresque. If Travis is guarded and Travis is sufficient then Travis is moresque. If something is guarded and not surmounted then it is puissant. All surmounted things are puissant. If something is surmounted and puissant then it is approving. All sufficient things are approving. If something is sufficient then it is approving. Emanuela is unsanitary.", "logic": "\nGuarded(emanuela)\nApproving(emanuela)\nnot Unsanitary(emanuela)\nSufficient(emanuela)\nGuarded(travis)\nUnsanitary(travis)\nMoresque(travis)\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Surmounted(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) and Surmounted(x) -> Moresque(x))\nGuarded(travis) and Sufficient(travis) -> Moresque(travis)\nforall x (Guarded(x) and not Surmounted(x) -> Puissant(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) -> Puissant(x))\nforall x (Surmounted(x) and Puissant(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) -> Approving(x))\nforall x (Sufficient(x) -> Approving(x))\n\nUnsanitary(emanuela)\n\ntherefore not Unsanitary(emanuela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Kirbie is branchial. Kirbie is immiscible. Kirbie is not uphill. Kirbie is orientated. Florette is branchial. Florette is uphill. Florette is uterine. Nice things are unforested. All uphill, unforested things are uterine. If Florette is branchial and Florette is orientated then Florette is uterine. If something is branchial and not unforested then it is darned. All unforested things are darned. If something is unforested and darned then it is immiscible. All orientated things are immiscible. If something is orientated then it is immiscible. Florette is unforested.", "logic": "\nBranchial(kirbie)\nImmiscible(kirbie)\nnot Uphill(kirbie)\nOrientated(kirbie)\nBranchial(florette)\nUphill(florette)\nUterine(florette)\nforall x (Uphill(x) -> Unforested(x))\nforall x (Uphill(x) and Unforested(x) -> Uterine(x))\nBranchial(florette) and Orientated(florette) -> Uterine(florette)\nforall x (Branchial(x) and not Unforested(x) -> Darned(x))\nforall x (Unforested(x) -> Darned(x))\nforall x (Unforested(x) and Darned(x) -> Immiscible(x))\nforall x (Orientated(x) -> Immiscible(x))\nforall x (Orientated(x) -> Immiscible(x))\n\nUnforested(florette)\n\nUphill(florette) and forall x (Uphill(x) -> Unforested(x)) -> therefore Unforested(florette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Joey is upbeat. Joey is pockmarked. Joey is not rank. Joey is cubiform. Gilles is upbeat. Gilles is rank. Gilles is adductive. Nice things are sightless. All rank, sightless things are adductive. If Gilles is upbeat and Gilles is cubiform then Gilles is adductive. If something is upbeat and not sightless then it is saxatile. All sightless things are saxatile. If something is sightless and saxatile then it is pockmarked. All cubiform things are pockmarked. If something is cubiform then it is pockmarked. Gilles is not sightless.", "logic": "\nUpbeat(joey)\nPockmarked(joey)\nnot Rank(joey)\nCubiform(joey)\nUpbeat(gilles)\nRank(gilles)\nAdductive(gilles)\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Sightless(x))\nforall x (Rank(x) and Sightless(x) -> Adductive(x))\nUpbeat(gilles) and Cubiform(gilles) -> Adductive(gilles)\nforall x (Upbeat(x) and not Sightless(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nforall x (Sightless(x) -> Saxatile(x))\nforall x (Sightless(x) and Saxatile(x) -> Pockmarked(x))\nforall x (Cubiform(x) -> Pockmarked(x))\nforall x (Cubiform(x) -> Pockmarked(x))\n\nnot Sightless(gilles)\n\nRank(gilles) and forall x (Rank(x) -> Sightless(x)) -> therefore Sightless(gilles)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Blanche is skilful. Blanche is finer. Blanche is not chatty. Blanche is emended. Thaddus is skilful. Thaddus is chatty. Thaddus is trilobed. Nice things are roadless. All chatty, roadless things are trilobed. If Thaddus is skilful and Thaddus is emended then Thaddus is trilobed. If something is skilful and not roadless then it is north. All roadless things are north. If something is roadless and north then it is finer. All emended things are finer. If something is emended then it is finer. Thaddus is north.", "logic": "\nSkilful(blanche)\nFiner(blanche)\nnot Chatty(blanche)\nEmended(blanche)\nSkilful(thaddus)\nChatty(thaddus)\nTrilobed(thaddus)\nforall x (Chatty(x) -> Roadless(x))\nforall x (Chatty(x) and Roadless(x) -> Trilobed(x))\nSkilful(thaddus) and Emended(thaddus) -> Trilobed(thaddus)\nforall x (Skilful(x) and not Roadless(x) -> North(x))\nforall x (Roadless(x) -> North(x))\nforall x (Roadless(x) and North(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Emended(x) -> Finer(x))\nforall x (Emended(x) -> Finer(x))\n\nNorth(thaddus)\n\nChatty(thaddus) and forall x (Chatty(x) -> Roadless(x)) -> therefore Roadless(thaddus) Roadless(thaddus) and forall x (Roadless(x) -> North(x)) -> therefore North(thaddus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Arabele is alarming. Arabele is puranic. Arabele is not factorial. Arabele is cragfast. Kirstin is alarming. Kirstin is factorial. Kirstin is historical. Nice things are pyrolytic. All factorial, pyrolytic things are historical. If Kirstin is alarming and Kirstin is cragfast then Kirstin is historical. If something is alarming and not pyrolytic then it is ovate. All pyrolytic things are ovate. If something is pyrolytic and ovate then it is puranic. All cragfast things are puranic. If something is cragfast then it is puranic. Kirstin is not ovate.", "logic": "\nAlarming(arabele)\nPuranic(arabele)\nnot Factorial(arabele)\nCragfast(arabele)\nAlarming(kirstin)\nFactorial(kirstin)\nHistorical(kirstin)\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\nforall x (Factorial(x) and Pyrolytic(x) -> Historical(x))\nAlarming(kirstin) and Cragfast(kirstin) -> Historical(kirstin)\nforall x (Alarming(x) and not Pyrolytic(x) -> Ovate(x))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Ovate(x))\nforall x (Pyrolytic(x) and Ovate(x) -> Puranic(x))\nforall x (Cragfast(x) -> Puranic(x))\nforall x (Cragfast(x) -> Puranic(x))\n\nnot Ovate(kirstin)\n\nFactorial(kirstin) and forall x (Factorial(x) -> Pyrolytic(x)) -> therefore Pyrolytic(kirstin) Pyrolytic(kirstin) and forall x (Pyrolytic(x) -> Ovate(x)) -> therefore Ovate(kirstin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Nathanil is urgent. Nathanil is standpat. Nathanil is not wiry. Nathanil is apostate. Suzie is urgent. Suzie is wiry. Suzie is socialised. Nice things are wheeled. All wiry, wheeled things are socialised. If Suzie is urgent and Suzie is apostate then Suzie is socialised. If something is urgent and not wheeled then it is brainish. All wheeled things are brainish. If something is wheeled and brainish then it is standpat. All apostate things are standpat. If something is apostate then it is standpat. Suzie is standpat.", "logic": "\nUrgent(nathanil)\nStandpat(nathanil)\nnot Wiry(nathanil)\nApostate(nathanil)\nUrgent(suzie)\nWiry(suzie)\nSocialised(suzie)\nforall x (Wiry(x) -> Wheeled(x))\nforall x (Wiry(x) and Wheeled(x) -> Socialised(x))\nUrgent(suzie) and Apostate(suzie) -> Socialised(suzie)\nforall x (Urgent(x) and not Wheeled(x) -> Brainish(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) -> Brainish(x))\nforall x (Wheeled(x) and Brainish(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Apostate(x) -> Standpat(x))\nforall x (Apostate(x) -> Standpat(x))\n\nStandpat(suzie)\n\nWiry(suzie) and forall x (Wiry(x) -> Wheeled(x)) -> therefore Wheeled(suzie) Wiry(suzie) and forall x (Wiry(x) -> Wheeled(x)) -> therefore Wheeled(suzie) Wheeled(suzie) and forall x (Wheeled(x) -> Brainish(x)) -> therefore Brainish(suzie) Wheeled(suzie) and Brainish(suzie) and forall x (Wheeled(x) and Brainish(x) -> Standpat(x)) -> therefore Standpat(suzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Darelle is forfeit. Darelle is captious. Darelle is not unrevised. Darelle is concentric. Newton is forfeit. Newton is unrevised. Newton is shriveled. Nice things are bladed. All unrevised, bladed things are shriveled. If Newton is forfeit and Newton is concentric then Newton is shriveled. If something is forfeit and not bladed then it is close. All bladed things are close. If something is bladed and close then it is captious. All concentric things are captious. If something is concentric then it is captious. Newton is not captious.", "logic": "\nForfeit(darelle)\nCaptious(darelle)\nnot Unrevised(darelle)\nConcentric(darelle)\nForfeit(newton)\nUnrevised(newton)\nShriveled(newton)\nforall x (Unrevised(x) -> Bladed(x))\nforall x (Unrevised(x) and Bladed(x) -> Shriveled(x))\nForfeit(newton) and Concentric(newton) -> Shriveled(newton)\nforall x (Forfeit(x) and not Bladed(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) -> Close(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) and Close(x) -> Captious(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> Captious(x))\nforall x (Concentric(x) -> Captious(x))\n\nnot Captious(newton)\n\nUnrevised(newton) and forall x (Unrevised(x) -> Bladed(x)) -> therefore Bladed(newton) Unrevised(newton) and forall x (Unrevised(x) -> Bladed(x)) -> therefore Bladed(newton) Bladed(newton) and forall x (Bladed(x) -> Close(x)) -> therefore Close(newton) Bladed(newton) and Close(newton) and forall x (Bladed(x) and Close(x) -> Captious(x)) -> therefore Captious(newton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Jonie is uric. Jonie is aneurysmal. Jonie is not peltate. Jonie is slowgoing. Hallie is uric. Hallie is peltate. Hallie is confirmed. Nice things are egoistic. All peltate, egoistic things are confirmed. If Hallie is uric and Hallie is slowgoing then Hallie is confirmed. If something is uric and not egoistic then it is behavioral. All egoistic things are behavioral. If something is egoistic and behavioral then it is aneurysmal. All slowgoing things are aneurysmal. If something is slowgoing then it is aneurysmal. Jonie is not behavioral.", "logic": "\nUric(jonie)\nAneurysmal(jonie)\nnot Peltate(jonie)\nSlowgoing(jonie)\nUric(hallie)\nPeltate(hallie)\nConfirmed(hallie)\nforall x (Peltate(x) -> Egoistic(x))\nforall x (Peltate(x) and Egoistic(x) -> Confirmed(x))\nUric(hallie) and Slowgoing(hallie) -> Confirmed(hallie)\nforall x (Uric(x) and not Egoistic(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Egoistic(x) and Behavioral(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\nforall x (Slowgoing(x) -> Aneurysmal(x))\n\nnot Behavioral(jonie)\n\nforall x (Egoistic(x) -> Behavioral(x)) <- forall x (Peltate(x) -> Egoistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Daile is hypothetic. Daile is moneyless. Daile is not physical. Daile is deserving. Kathleen is hypothetic. Kathleen is physical. Kathleen is nilotic. Nice things are blameless. All physical, blameless things are nilotic. If Kathleen is hypothetic and Kathleen is deserving then Kathleen is nilotic. If something is hypothetic and not blameless then it is fourscore. All blameless things are fourscore. If something is blameless and fourscore then it is moneyless. All deserving things are moneyless. If something is deserving then it is moneyless. Daile is nilotic.", "logic": "\nHypothetic(daile)\nMoneyless(daile)\nnot Physical(daile)\nDeserving(daile)\nHypothetic(kathleen)\nPhysical(kathleen)\nNilotic(kathleen)\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Blameless(x))\nforall x (Physical(x) and Blameless(x) -> Nilotic(x))\nHypothetic(kathleen) and Deserving(kathleen) -> Nilotic(kathleen)\nforall x (Hypothetic(x) and not Blameless(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Blameless(x) -> Fourscore(x))\nforall x (Blameless(x) and Fourscore(x) -> Moneyless(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Moneyless(x))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Moneyless(x))\n\nNilotic(daile)\n\nforall x (Physical(x) and Blameless(x) -> Nilotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Sandie is anoestrous. Sandie is preemptive. Sandie is not tenth. Sandie is abashed. Tannie is anoestrous. Tannie is tenth. Tannie is valueless. Nice things are officious. All tenth, officious things are valueless. If Tannie is anoestrous and Tannie is abashed then Tannie is valueless. If something is anoestrous and not officious then it is recyclable. All officious things are recyclable. If something is officious and recyclable then it is preemptive. All abashed things are preemptive. If something is abashed then it is preemptive. Sandie is not officious.", "logic": "\nAnoestrous(sandie)\nPreemptive(sandie)\nnot Tenth(sandie)\nAbashed(sandie)\nAnoestrous(tannie)\nTenth(tannie)\nValueless(tannie)\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Officious(x))\nforall x (Tenth(x) and Officious(x) -> Valueless(x))\nAnoestrous(tannie) and Abashed(tannie) -> Valueless(tannie)\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and not Officious(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) -> Recyclable(x))\nforall x (Officious(x) and Recyclable(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Abashed(x) -> Preemptive(x))\nforall x (Abashed(x) -> Preemptive(x))\n\nnot Officious(sandie)\n\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Officious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "Sherwood is antipodean. Sherwood is stemless. Sherwood is not animating. Sherwood is isomorphic. Ethelred is antipodean. Ethelred is animating. Ethelred is leakproof. Nice things are liquid. All animating, liquid things are leakproof. If Ethelred is antipodean and Ethelred is isomorphic then Ethelred is leakproof. If something is antipodean and not liquid then it is alienated. All liquid things are alienated. If something is liquid and alienated then it is stemless. All isomorphic things are stemless. If something is isomorphic then it is stemless. Ethelred is isomorphic.", "logic": "\nAntipodean(sherwood)\nStemless(sherwood)\nnot Animating(sherwood)\nIsomorphic(sherwood)\nAntipodean(ethelred)\nAnimating(ethelred)\nLeakproof(ethelred)\nforall x (Animating(x) -> Liquid(x))\nforall x (Animating(x) and Liquid(x) -> Leakproof(x))\nAntipodean(ethelred) and Isomorphic(ethelred) -> Leakproof(ethelred)\nforall x (Antipodean(x) and not Liquid(x) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Liquid(x) -> Alienated(x))\nforall x (Liquid(x) and Alienated(x) -> Stemless(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Stemless(x))\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) -> Stemless(x))\n\nIsomorphic(ethelred)\n\nIsomorphic(ethelred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-57"} {"premises": "The corky recover the pate. The pate is anaerobic. The pate recover the corky. If the corky thumb the pate and the corky is not anaerobic then the corky is unnamed. If the corky thumb the pate and the corky is not caecilian then the pate recover the corky. If someone thumb the pate then the pate recover the corky. If someone is unnamed then they do not need the pate. If someone is dwarfish then they do not chase the pate. If someone thumb the pate and the pate thumb the corky then the corky thumb the pate. If someone recover the pate then they are dwarfish. If the pate is caecilian then the pate is dwarfish. The pate is anaerobic.", "logic": "\nRecover(corky, pate)\nAnaerobic(pate)\nRecover(pate, corky)\nThumb(corky, pate) and not Anaerobic(corky) -> Unnamed(corky)\nThumb(corky, pate) and not Caecilian(corky) -> Recover(pate, corky)\nforall x (Thumb(x, pate) -> Recover(pate, corky))\nforall x (Unnamed(x) -> not Recover(x, pate))\nforall x (Dwarfish(x) -> not Proctor(x, pate))\nforall x (Thumb(x, pate) and Thumb(pate, corky) -> Thumb(corky, pate))\nforall x (Recover(x, pate) -> Dwarfish(x))\nCaecilian(pate) -> Dwarfish(pate)\n\nAnaerobic(pate)\n\ntherefore Anaerobic(pate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The barnard currycomb the julian. The julian is aerobic. The julian currycomb the barnard. If the barnard birl the julian and the barnard is not aerobic then the barnard is halal. If the barnard birl the julian and the barnard is not immanent then the julian currycomb the barnard. If someone birl the julian then the julian currycomb the barnard. If someone is halal then they do not need the julian. If someone is demoniac then they do not chase the julian. If someone birl the julian and the julian birl the barnard then the barnard birl the julian. If someone currycomb the julian then they are demoniac. If the julian is immanent then the julian is demoniac. The julian is not aerobic.", "logic": "\nCurrycomb(barnard, julian)\nAerobic(julian)\nCurrycomb(julian, barnard)\nBirl(barnard, julian) and not Aerobic(barnard) -> Halal(barnard)\nBirl(barnard, julian) and not Immanent(barnard) -> Currycomb(julian, barnard)\nforall x (Birl(x, julian) -> Currycomb(julian, barnard))\nforall x (Halal(x) -> not Currycomb(x, julian))\nforall x (Demoniac(x) -> not Loom(x, julian))\nforall x (Birl(x, julian) and Birl(julian, barnard) -> Birl(barnard, julian))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, julian) -> Demoniac(x))\nImmanent(julian) -> Demoniac(julian)\n\nnot Aerobic(julian)\n\ntherefore Aerobic(julian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The monah sluice the karola. The karola is unfeigned. The karola sluice the monah. If the monah cloture the karola and the monah is not unfeigned then the monah is organic. If the monah cloture the karola and the monah is not asserting then the karola sluice the monah. If someone cloture the karola then the karola sluice the monah. If someone is organic then they do not need the karola. If someone is snappish then they do not chase the karola. If someone cloture the karola and the karola cloture the monah then the monah cloture the karola. If someone sluice the karola then they are snappish. If the karola is asserting then the karola is snappish. The monah is snappish.", "logic": "\nSluice(monah, karola)\nUnfeigned(karola)\nSluice(karola, monah)\nCloture(monah, karola) and not Unfeigned(monah) -> Organic(monah)\nCloture(monah, karola) and not Asserting(monah) -> Sluice(karola, monah)\nforall x (Cloture(x, karola) -> Sluice(karola, monah))\nforall x (Organic(x) -> not Sluice(x, karola))\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> not Carbonize(x, karola))\nforall x (Cloture(x, karola) and Cloture(karola, monah) -> Cloture(monah, karola))\nforall x (Sluice(x, karola) -> Snappish(x))\nAsserting(karola) -> Snappish(karola)\n\nSnappish(monah)\n\nSluice(monah, karola) and forall x (Sluice(x, karola) -> Snappish(x)) -> therefore Snappish(monah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The nance coldwork the opalina. The opalina is slithering. The opalina coldwork the nance. If the nance boom the opalina and the nance is not slithering then the nance is forceless. If the nance boom the opalina and the nance is not purulent then the opalina coldwork the nance. If someone boom the opalina then the opalina coldwork the nance. If someone is forceless then they do not need the opalina. If someone is cormous then they do not chase the opalina. If someone boom the opalina and the opalina boom the nance then the nance boom the opalina. If someone coldwork the opalina then they are cormous. If the opalina is purulent then the opalina is cormous. The nance is not cormous.", "logic": "\nColdwork(nance, opalina)\nSlithering(opalina)\nColdwork(opalina, nance)\nBoom(nance, opalina) and not Slithering(nance) -> Forceless(nance)\nBoom(nance, opalina) and not Purulent(nance) -> Coldwork(opalina, nance)\nforall x (Boom(x, opalina) -> Coldwork(opalina, nance))\nforall x (Forceless(x) -> not Coldwork(x, opalina))\nforall x (Cormous(x) -> not Pierce(x, opalina))\nforall x (Boom(x, opalina) and Boom(opalina, nance) -> Boom(nance, opalina))\nforall x (Coldwork(x, opalina) -> Cormous(x))\nPurulent(opalina) -> Cormous(opalina)\n\nnot Cormous(nance)\n\nColdwork(nance, opalina) and forall x (Coldwork(x, opalina) -> Cormous(x)) -> therefore Cormous(nance)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The zeus goof the garret. The garret is bootleg. The garret goof the zeus. If the zeus encrimson the garret and the zeus is not bootleg then the zeus is manageable. If the zeus encrimson the garret and the zeus is not humbled then the garret goof the zeus. If someone encrimson the garret then the garret goof the zeus. If someone is manageable then they do not need the garret. If someone is dilettante then they do not chase the garret. If someone encrimson the garret and the garret encrimson the zeus then the zeus encrimson the garret. If someone goof the garret then they are dilettante. If the garret is humbled then the garret is dilettante. The zeus does not chase the garret.", "logic": "\nGoof(zeus, garret)\nBootleg(garret)\nGoof(garret, zeus)\nEncrimson(zeus, garret) and not Bootleg(zeus) -> Manageable(zeus)\nEncrimson(zeus, garret) and not Humbled(zeus) -> Goof(garret, zeus)\nforall x (Encrimson(x, garret) -> Goof(garret, zeus))\nforall x (Manageable(x) -> not Goof(x, garret))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) -> not Remediate(x, garret))\nforall x (Encrimson(x, garret) and Encrimson(garret, zeus) -> Encrimson(zeus, garret))\nforall x (Goof(x, garret) -> Dilettante(x))\nHumbled(garret) -> Dilettante(garret)\n\nnot Remediate(zeus, garret)\n\nGoof(zeus, garret) and forall x (Goof(x, garret) -> Dilettante(x)) -> therefore Dilettante(zeus) Dilettante(zeus) and forall x (Dilettante(x) -> not Remediate(x, garret)) -> therefore not Remediate(zeus, garret)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The belle resonate the joelie. The joelie is beneficed. The joelie resonate the belle. If the belle skateboard the joelie and the belle is not beneficed then the belle is lingulate. If the belle skateboard the joelie and the belle is not lucky then the joelie resonate the belle. If someone skateboard the joelie then the joelie resonate the belle. If someone is lingulate then they do not need the joelie. If someone is ungroomed then they do not chase the joelie. If someone skateboard the joelie and the joelie skateboard the belle then the belle skateboard the joelie. If someone resonate the joelie then they are ungroomed. If the joelie is lucky then the joelie is ungroomed. The belle crenelate the joelie.", "logic": "\nResonate(belle, joelie)\nBeneficed(joelie)\nResonate(joelie, belle)\nSkateboard(belle, joelie) and not Beneficed(belle) -> Lingulate(belle)\nSkateboard(belle, joelie) and not Lucky(belle) -> Resonate(joelie, belle)\nforall x (Skateboard(x, joelie) -> Resonate(joelie, belle))\nforall x (Lingulate(x) -> not Resonate(x, joelie))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> not Crenelate(x, joelie))\nforall x (Skateboard(x, joelie) and Skateboard(joelie, belle) -> Skateboard(belle, joelie))\nforall x (Resonate(x, joelie) -> Ungroomed(x))\nLucky(joelie) -> Ungroomed(joelie)\n\nCrenelate(belle, joelie)\n\nResonate(belle, joelie) and forall x (Resonate(x, joelie) -> Ungroomed(x)) -> therefore Ungroomed(belle) Ungroomed(belle) and forall x (Ungroomed(x) -> not Crenelate(x, joelie)) -> therefore not Crenelate(belle, joelie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The marga cave the grant. The grant is amniotic. The grant cave the marga. If the marga blob the grant and the marga is not amniotic then the marga is ebon. If the marga blob the grant and the marga is not bluff then the grant cave the marga. If someone blob the grant then the grant cave the marga. If someone is ebon then they do not need the grant. If someone is unlifelike then they do not chase the grant. If someone blob the grant and the grant blob the marga then the marga blob the grant. If someone cave the grant then they are unlifelike. If the grant is bluff then the grant is unlifelike. The marga does not eat the grant.", "logic": "\nCave(marga, grant)\nAmniotic(grant)\nCave(grant, marga)\nBlob(marga, grant) and not Amniotic(marga) -> Ebon(marga)\nBlob(marga, grant) and not Bluff(marga) -> Cave(grant, marga)\nforall x (Blob(x, grant) -> Cave(grant, marga))\nforall x (Ebon(x) -> not Cave(x, grant))\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) -> not Buff(x, grant))\nforall x (Blob(x, grant) and Blob(grant, marga) -> Blob(marga, grant))\nforall x (Cave(x, grant) -> Unlifelike(x))\nBluff(grant) -> Unlifelike(grant)\n\nnot Blob(marga, grant)\n\nforall x (Blob(x, grant) and Blob(grant, marga) -> Blob(marga, grant)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The nadia resurface the lissi. The lissi is motored. The lissi resurface the nadia. If the nadia flight the lissi and the nadia is not motored then the nadia is azido. If the nadia flight the lissi and the nadia is not fruticose then the lissi resurface the nadia. If someone flight the lissi then the lissi resurface the nadia. If someone is azido then they do not need the lissi. If someone is sugarless then they do not chase the lissi. If someone flight the lissi and the lissi flight the nadia then the nadia flight the lissi. If someone resurface the lissi then they are sugarless. If the lissi is fruticose then the lissi is sugarless. The lissi is sugarless.", "logic": "\nResurface(nadia, lissi)\nMotored(lissi)\nResurface(lissi, nadia)\nFlight(nadia, lissi) and not Motored(nadia) -> Azido(nadia)\nFlight(nadia, lissi) and not Fruticose(nadia) -> Resurface(lissi, nadia)\nforall x (Flight(x, lissi) -> Resurface(lissi, nadia))\nforall x (Azido(x) -> not Resurface(x, lissi))\nforall x (Sugarless(x) -> not Decay(x, lissi))\nforall x (Flight(x, lissi) and Flight(lissi, nadia) -> Flight(nadia, lissi))\nforall x (Resurface(x, lissi) -> Sugarless(x))\nFruticose(lissi) -> Sugarless(lissi)\n\nSugarless(lissi)\n\nforall x (Resurface(x, lissi) -> Sugarless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The sara clot the jojo. The jojo is destined. The jojo clot the sara. If the sara juggle the jojo and the sara is not destined then the sara is ambagious. If the sara juggle the jojo and the sara is not hypnogogic then the jojo clot the sara. If someone juggle the jojo then the jojo clot the sara. If someone is ambagious then they do not need the jojo. If someone is arbitrary then they do not chase the jojo. If someone juggle the jojo and the jojo juggle the sara then the sara juggle the jojo. If someone clot the jojo then they are arbitrary. If the jojo is hypnogogic then the jojo is arbitrary. The sara is not ambagious.", "logic": "\nClot(sara, jojo)\nDestined(jojo)\nClot(jojo, sara)\nJuggle(sara, jojo) and not Destined(sara) -> Ambagious(sara)\nJuggle(sara, jojo) and not Hypnogogic(sara) -> Clot(jojo, sara)\nforall x (Juggle(x, jojo) -> Clot(jojo, sara))\nforall x (Ambagious(x) -> not Clot(x, jojo))\nforall x (Arbitrary(x) -> not Disjoin(x, jojo))\nforall x (Juggle(x, jojo) and Juggle(jojo, sara) -> Juggle(sara, jojo))\nforall x (Clot(x, jojo) -> Arbitrary(x))\nHypnogogic(jojo) -> Arbitrary(jojo)\n\nnot Ambagious(sara)\n\nJuggle(sara, jojo) and not Destined(sara) -> Ambagious(sara) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The candice belt the doug. The doug is gluey. The doug belt the candice. If the candice odorize the doug and the candice is not gluey then the candice is catkinate. If the candice odorize the doug and the candice is not collarless then the doug belt the candice. If someone odorize the doug then the doug belt the candice. If someone is catkinate then they do not need the doug. If someone is hardback then they do not chase the doug. If someone odorize the doug and the doug odorize the candice then the candice odorize the doug. If someone belt the doug then they are hardback. If the doug is collarless then the doug is hardback. The doug belt the doug.", "logic": "\nBelt(candice, doug)\nGluey(doug)\nBelt(doug, candice)\nOdorize(candice, doug) and not Gluey(candice) -> Catkinate(candice)\nOdorize(candice, doug) and not Collarless(candice) -> Belt(doug, candice)\nforall x (Odorize(x, doug) -> Belt(doug, candice))\nforall x (Catkinate(x) -> not Belt(x, doug))\nforall x (Hardback(x) -> not Impeach(x, doug))\nforall x (Odorize(x, doug) and Odorize(doug, candice) -> Odorize(candice, doug))\nforall x (Belt(x, doug) -> Hardback(x))\nCollarless(doug) -> Hardback(doug)\n\nBelt(doug, doug)\n\nBelt(doug, doug) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The jeffry bedim the valerie. The valerie is mazed. The valerie bedim the jeffry. If the jeffry wisecrack the valerie and the jeffry is not mazed then the jeffry is phenomenal. If the jeffry wisecrack the valerie and the jeffry is not thinkable then the valerie bedim the jeffry. If someone wisecrack the valerie then the valerie bedim the jeffry. If someone is phenomenal then they do not need the valerie. If someone is gloomy then they do not chase the valerie. If someone wisecrack the valerie and the valerie wisecrack the jeffry then the jeffry wisecrack the valerie. If someone bedim the valerie then they are gloomy. If the valerie is thinkable then the valerie is gloomy. The jeffry is not green.", "logic": "\nBedim(jeffry, valerie)\nMazed(valerie)\nBedim(valerie, jeffry)\nWisecrack(jeffry, valerie) and not Mazed(jeffry) -> Phenomenal(jeffry)\nWisecrack(jeffry, valerie) and not Thinkable(jeffry) -> Bedim(valerie, jeffry)\nforall x (Wisecrack(x, valerie) -> Bedim(valerie, jeffry))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) -> not Bedim(x, valerie))\nforall x (Gloomy(x) -> not Outguess(x, valerie))\nforall x (Wisecrack(x, valerie) and Wisecrack(valerie, jeffry) -> Wisecrack(jeffry, valerie))\nforall x (Bedim(x, valerie) -> Gloomy(x))\nThinkable(valerie) -> Gloomy(valerie)\n\nnot Green(jeffry)\n\nnot Green(jeffry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The osbourn niggle the neale. The neale is farsighted. The neale niggle the osbourn. If the osbourn mishandle the neale and the osbourn is not farsighted then the osbourn is pejorative. If the osbourn mishandle the neale and the osbourn is not ergotic then the neale niggle the osbourn. If someone mishandle the neale then the neale niggle the osbourn. If someone is pejorative then they do not need the neale. If someone is uplifted then they do not chase the neale. If someone mishandle the neale and the neale mishandle the osbourn then the osbourn mishandle the neale. If someone niggle the neale then they are uplifted. If the neale is ergotic then the neale is uplifted. The osbourn is ergotic.", "logic": "\nNiggle(osbourn, neale)\nFarsighted(neale)\nNiggle(neale, osbourn)\nMishandle(osbourn, neale) and not Farsighted(osbourn) -> Pejorative(osbourn)\nMishandle(osbourn, neale) and not Ergotic(osbourn) -> Niggle(neale, osbourn)\nforall x (Mishandle(x, neale) -> Niggle(neale, osbourn))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) -> not Niggle(x, neale))\nforall x (Uplifted(x) -> not Decimalise(x, neale))\nforall x (Mishandle(x, neale) and Mishandle(neale, osbourn) -> Mishandle(osbourn, neale))\nforall x (Niggle(x, neale) -> Uplifted(x))\nErgotic(neale) -> Uplifted(neale)\n\nErgotic(osbourn)\n\nErgotic(osbourn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1352"} {"premises": "The lurline is integral. If someone is agential and integral then they are stative. If the lurline is stative then the lurline is depilous. Nice people are agential. The lurline is integral.", "logic": "\nIntegral(lurline)\nforall x (Agential(x) and Integral(x) -> Stative(x))\nStative(lurline) -> Depilous(lurline)\nforall x (Integral(x) -> Agential(x))\n\nIntegral(lurline)\n\ntherefore Integral(lurline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The stillmann is innoxious. If someone is uncoloured and innoxious then they are skewed. If the stillmann is skewed then the stillmann is wideband. Nice people are uncoloured. The stillmann is not innoxious.", "logic": "\nInnoxious(stillmann)\nforall x (Uncoloured(x) and Innoxious(x) -> Skewed(x))\nSkewed(stillmann) -> Wideband(stillmann)\nforall x (Innoxious(x) -> Uncoloured(x))\n\nnot Innoxious(stillmann)\n\ntherefore Innoxious(stillmann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The ulric is plausible. If someone is adverse and plausible then they are frumpish. If the ulric is frumpish then the ulric is skimmed. Nice people are adverse. The ulric is adverse.", "logic": "\nPlausible(ulric)\nforall x (Adverse(x) and Plausible(x) -> Frumpish(x))\nFrumpish(ulric) -> Skimmed(ulric)\nforall x (Plausible(x) -> Adverse(x))\n\nAdverse(ulric)\n\nPlausible(ulric) and forall x (Plausible(x) -> Adverse(x)) -> therefore Adverse(ulric)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The claudina is brattish. If someone is leprose and brattish then they are cranial. If the claudina is cranial then the claudina is yeastlike. Nice people are leprose. The claudina is not leprose.", "logic": "\nBrattish(claudina)\nforall x (Leprose(x) and Brattish(x) -> Cranial(x))\nCranial(claudina) -> Yeastlike(claudina)\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> Leprose(x))\n\nnot Leprose(claudina)\n\nBrattish(claudina) and forall x (Brattish(x) -> Leprose(x)) -> therefore Leprose(claudina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The lottie is impeccable. If someone is abient and impeccable then they are higher. If the lottie is higher then the lottie is parabolic. Nice people are abient. The lottie is higher.", "logic": "\nImpeccable(lottie)\nforall x (Abient(x) and Impeccable(x) -> Higher(x))\nHigher(lottie) -> Parabolic(lottie)\nforall x (Impeccable(x) -> Abient(x))\n\nHigher(lottie)\n\nImpeccable(lottie) and forall x (Impeccable(x) -> Abient(x)) -> therefore Abient(lottie) Abient(lottie) and Impeccable(lottie) and forall x (Abient(x) and Impeccable(x) -> Higher(x)) -> therefore Higher(lottie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The modesty is excitative. If someone is alright and excitative then they are overactive. If the modesty is overactive then the modesty is unflavored. Nice people are alright. The modesty is not overactive.", "logic": "\nExcitative(modesty)\nforall x (Alright(x) and Excitative(x) -> Overactive(x))\nOveractive(modesty) -> Unflavored(modesty)\nforall x (Excitative(x) -> Alright(x))\n\nnot Overactive(modesty)\n\nExcitative(modesty) and forall x (Excitative(x) -> Alright(x)) -> therefore Alright(modesty) Alright(modesty) and Excitative(modesty) and forall x (Alright(x) and Excitative(x) -> Overactive(x)) -> therefore Overactive(modesty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The robenia is utility. If someone is empirical and utility then they are brownish. If the robenia is brownish then the robenia is champleve. Nice people are empirical. The robenia is champleve.", "logic": "\nUtility(robenia)\nforall x (Empirical(x) and Utility(x) -> Brownish(x))\nBrownish(robenia) -> Champleve(robenia)\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Empirical(x))\n\nChampleve(robenia)\n\nUtility(robenia) and forall x (Utility(x) -> Empirical(x)) -> therefore Empirical(robenia) Empirical(robenia) and Utility(robenia) and forall x (Empirical(x) and Utility(x) -> Brownish(x)) -> therefore Brownish(robenia) Brownish(robenia) and Brownish(robenia) -> Champleve(robenia) -> therefore Champleve(robenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The milton is unsaleable. If someone is marine and unsaleable then they are natural. If the milton is natural then the milton is deviate. Nice people are marine. The milton is not deviate.", "logic": "\nUnsaleable(milton)\nforall x (Marine(x) and Unsaleable(x) -> Natural(x))\nNatural(milton) -> Deviate(milton)\nforall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Marine(x))\n\nnot Deviate(milton)\n\nUnsaleable(milton) and forall x (Unsaleable(x) -> Marine(x)) -> therefore Marine(milton) Marine(milton) and Unsaleable(milton) and forall x (Marine(x) and Unsaleable(x) -> Natural(x)) -> therefore Natural(milton) Natural(milton) and Natural(milton) -> Deviate(milton) -> therefore Deviate(milton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The darla is signed. If someone is tailed and signed then they are nonionised. If the darla is nonionised then the darla is pawky. Nice people are tailed. The darla does not eat the darla.", "logic": "\nSigned(darla)\nforall x (Tailed(x) and Signed(x) -> Nonionised(x))\nNonionised(darla) -> Pawky(darla)\nforall x (Signed(x) -> Tailed(x))\n\nnot Eats(darla, darla)\n\nnot Eats(darla, darla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The klaus is alkalic. If someone is appetising and alkalic then they are toed. If the klaus is toed then the klaus is braggy. Nice people are appetising. The klaus needs the klaus.", "logic": "\nAlkalic(klaus)\nforall x (Appetising(x) and Alkalic(x) -> Toed(x))\nToed(klaus) -> Braggy(klaus)\nforall x (Alkalic(x) -> Appetising(x))\n\nNeeds(klaus, klaus)\n\nNeeds(klaus, klaus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The federica is heliac. If someone is mucous and heliac then they are dissolute. If the federica is dissolute then the federica is camp. Nice people are mucous. The federica does not like the federica.", "logic": "\nHeliac(federica)\nforall x (Mucous(x) and Heliac(x) -> Dissolute(x))\nDissolute(federica) -> Camp(federica)\nforall x (Heliac(x) -> Mucous(x))\n\nnot Likes(federica, federica)\n\nnot Likes(federica, federica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The griselda is arboreal. If someone is democratic and arboreal then they are hybrid. If the griselda is hybrid then the griselda is barbed. Nice people are democratic. The griselda is blue.", "logic": "\nArboreal(griselda)\nforall x (Democratic(x) and Arboreal(x) -> Hybrid(x))\nHybrid(griselda) -> Barbed(griselda)\nforall x (Arboreal(x) -> Democratic(x))\n\nBlue(griselda)\n\nBlue(griselda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1365"} {"premises": "The cally treble the sanson. The sanson is catalytic. If someone treble the sanson then the sanson treble the cally. If someone overwhelm the sanson then the sanson overwhelm the cally. If someone treble the cally then the cally does not visit the sanson. If someone is catalytic then they do not chase the cally. If someone epitomise the sanson then the sanson is exchanged. If someone is catalytic and they like the cally then the cally is catalytic. The cally treble the sanson.", "logic": "\nTreble(cally, sanson)\nCatalytic(sanson)\nforall x (Treble(x, sanson) -> Treble(sanson, cally))\nforall x (Overwhelm(x, sanson) -> Overwhelm(sanson, cally))\nforall x (Treble(x, cally) -> not Overwhelm(cally, sanson))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) -> not Epitomise(x, cally))\nforall x (Epitomise(x, sanson) -> Exchanged(sanson))\nforall x (Catalytic(x) and Treble(x, cally) -> Catalytic(cally))\n\nTreble(cally, sanson)\n\ntherefore Treble(cally, sanson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The kerri gelatinize the mitchell. The mitchell is arawakan. If someone gelatinize the mitchell then the mitchell gelatinize the kerri. If someone renegade the mitchell then the mitchell renegade the kerri. If someone gelatinize the kerri then the kerri does not visit the mitchell. If someone is arawakan then they do not chase the kerri. If someone beware the mitchell then the mitchell is lowset. If someone is arawakan and they like the kerri then the kerri is arawakan. The mitchell is not arawakan.", "logic": "\nGelatinize(kerri, mitchell)\nArawakan(mitchell)\nforall x (Gelatinize(x, mitchell) -> Gelatinize(mitchell, kerri))\nforall x (Renegade(x, mitchell) -> Renegade(mitchell, kerri))\nforall x (Gelatinize(x, kerri) -> not Renegade(kerri, mitchell))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) -> not Beware(x, kerri))\nforall x (Beware(x, mitchell) -> Lowset(mitchell))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) and Gelatinize(x, kerri) -> Arawakan(kerri))\n\nnot Arawakan(mitchell)\n\ntherefore Arawakan(mitchell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The basia squash the angelle. The angelle is ropy. If someone squash the angelle then the angelle squash the basia. If someone potentiate the angelle then the angelle potentiate the basia. If someone squash the basia then the basia does not visit the angelle. If someone is ropy then they do not chase the basia. If someone defraud the angelle then the angelle is anoxemic. If someone is ropy and they like the basia then the basia is ropy. The angelle does not chase the basia.", "logic": "\nSquash(basia, angelle)\nRopy(angelle)\nforall x (Squash(x, angelle) -> Squash(angelle, basia))\nforall x (Potentiate(x, angelle) -> Potentiate(angelle, basia))\nforall x (Squash(x, basia) -> not Potentiate(basia, angelle))\nforall x (Ropy(x) -> not Defraud(x, basia))\nforall x (Defraud(x, angelle) -> Anoxemic(angelle))\nforall x (Ropy(x) and Squash(x, basia) -> Ropy(basia))\n\nnot Defraud(angelle, basia)\n\nRopy(angelle) and forall x (Ropy(x) -> not Defraud(x, basia)) -> therefore not Defraud(angelle, basia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The shawnee probate the cilka. The cilka is silky. If someone probate the cilka then the cilka probate the shawnee. If someone thaw the cilka then the cilka thaw the shawnee. If someone probate the shawnee then the shawnee does not visit the cilka. If someone is silky then they do not chase the shawnee. If someone moderate the cilka then the cilka is scarce. If someone is silky and they like the shawnee then the shawnee is silky. The cilka does not like the shawnee.", "logic": "\nProbate(shawnee, cilka)\nSilky(cilka)\nforall x (Probate(x, cilka) -> Probate(cilka, shawnee))\nforall x (Thaw(x, cilka) -> Thaw(cilka, shawnee))\nforall x (Probate(x, shawnee) -> not Thaw(shawnee, cilka))\nforall x (Silky(x) -> not Moderate(x, shawnee))\nforall x (Moderate(x, cilka) -> Scarce(cilka))\nforall x (Silky(x) and Probate(x, shawnee) -> Silky(shawnee))\n\nnot Probate(cilka, shawnee)\n\nProbate(shawnee, cilka) and forall x (Probate(x, cilka) -> Probate(cilka, shawnee)) -> therefore Probate(cilka, shawnee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The fiorenze smear the margy. The margy is alacritous. If someone smear the margy then the margy smear the fiorenze. If someone inseminate the margy then the margy inseminate the fiorenze. If someone smear the fiorenze then the fiorenze does not visit the margy. If someone is alacritous then they do not chase the fiorenze. If someone pander the margy then the margy is amerind. If someone is alacritous and they like the fiorenze then the fiorenze is alacritous. The fiorenze is alacritous.", "logic": "\nSmear(fiorenze, margy)\nAlacritous(margy)\nforall x (Smear(x, margy) -> Smear(margy, fiorenze))\nforall x (Inseminate(x, margy) -> Inseminate(margy, fiorenze))\nforall x (Smear(x, fiorenze) -> not Inseminate(fiorenze, margy))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) -> not Pander(x, fiorenze))\nforall x (Pander(x, margy) -> Amerind(margy))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) and Smear(x, fiorenze) -> Alacritous(fiorenze))\n\nAlacritous(fiorenze)\n\nSmear(fiorenze, margy) and forall x (Smear(x, margy) -> Smear(margy, fiorenze)) -> therefore Smear(margy, fiorenze) Alacritous(margy) and Smear(margy, fiorenze) and forall x (Alacritous(x) and Smear(x, fiorenze) -> Alacritous(fiorenze)) -> therefore Alacritous(fiorenze)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The priscilla devil the paulita. The paulita is orderly. If someone devil the paulita then the paulita devil the priscilla. If someone defrost the paulita then the paulita defrost the priscilla. If someone devil the priscilla then the priscilla does not visit the paulita. If someone is orderly then they do not chase the priscilla. If someone escalade the paulita then the paulita is spousal. If someone is orderly and they like the priscilla then the priscilla is orderly. The priscilla is not orderly.", "logic": "\nDevil(priscilla, paulita)\nOrderly(paulita)\nforall x (Devil(x, paulita) -> Devil(paulita, priscilla))\nforall x (Defrost(x, paulita) -> Defrost(paulita, priscilla))\nforall x (Devil(x, priscilla) -> not Defrost(priscilla, paulita))\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> not Escalade(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Escalade(x, paulita) -> Spousal(paulita))\nforall x (Orderly(x) and Devil(x, priscilla) -> Orderly(priscilla))\n\nnot Orderly(priscilla)\n\nDevil(priscilla, paulita) and forall x (Devil(x, paulita) -> Devil(paulita, priscilla)) -> therefore Devil(paulita, priscilla) Orderly(paulita) and Devil(paulita, priscilla) and forall x (Orderly(x) and Devil(x, priscilla) -> Orderly(priscilla)) -> therefore Orderly(priscilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The adolpho abduct the jay. The jay is pragmatic. If someone abduct the jay then the jay abduct the adolpho. If someone mythicize the jay then the jay mythicize the adolpho. If someone abduct the adolpho then the adolpho does not visit the jay. If someone is pragmatic then they do not chase the adolpho. If someone auction the jay then the jay is paediatric. If someone is pragmatic and they like the adolpho then the adolpho is pragmatic. The adolpho does not chase the adolpho.", "logic": "\nAbduct(adolpho, jay)\nPragmatic(jay)\nforall x (Abduct(x, jay) -> Abduct(jay, adolpho))\nforall x (Mythicize(x, jay) -> Mythicize(jay, adolpho))\nforall x (Abduct(x, adolpho) -> not Mythicize(adolpho, jay))\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) -> not Auction(x, adolpho))\nforall x (Auction(x, jay) -> Paediatric(jay))\nforall x (Pragmatic(x) and Abduct(x, adolpho) -> Pragmatic(adolpho))\n\nnot Auction(adolpho, adolpho)\n\nAbduct(adolpho, jay) and forall x (Abduct(x, jay) -> Abduct(jay, adolpho)) -> therefore Abduct(jay, adolpho) Pragmatic(jay) and Abduct(jay, adolpho) and forall x (Pragmatic(x) and Abduct(x, adolpho) -> Pragmatic(adolpho)) -> therefore Pragmatic(adolpho) Pragmatic(adolpho) and forall x (Pragmatic(x) -> not Auction(x, adolpho)) -> therefore not Auction(adolpho, adolpho)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The brietta vent the ilse. The ilse is gangly. If someone vent the ilse then the ilse vent the brietta. If someone intermit the ilse then the ilse intermit the brietta. If someone vent the brietta then the brietta does not visit the ilse. If someone is gangly then they do not chase the brietta. If someone synthesize the ilse then the ilse is sweltry. If someone is gangly and they like the brietta then the brietta is gangly. The brietta synthesize the brietta.", "logic": "\nVent(brietta, ilse)\nGangly(ilse)\nforall x (Vent(x, ilse) -> Vent(ilse, brietta))\nforall x (Intermit(x, ilse) -> Intermit(ilse, brietta))\nforall x (Vent(x, brietta) -> not Intermit(brietta, ilse))\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> not Synthesize(x, brietta))\nforall x (Synthesize(x, ilse) -> Sweltry(ilse))\nforall x (Gangly(x) and Vent(x, brietta) -> Gangly(brietta))\n\nSynthesize(brietta, brietta)\n\nVent(brietta, ilse) and forall x (Vent(x, ilse) -> Vent(ilse, brietta)) -> therefore Vent(ilse, brietta) Gangly(ilse) and Vent(ilse, brietta) and forall x (Gangly(x) and Vent(x, brietta) -> Gangly(brietta)) -> therefore Gangly(brietta) Gangly(brietta) and forall x (Gangly(x) -> not Synthesize(x, brietta)) -> therefore not Synthesize(brietta, brietta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The durward wean the chrysa. The chrysa is prox. If someone wean the chrysa then the chrysa wean the durward. If someone agree the chrysa then the chrysa agree the durward. If someone wean the durward then the durward does not visit the chrysa. If someone is prox then they do not chase the durward. If someone grout the chrysa then the chrysa is netted. If someone is prox and they like the durward then the durward is prox. The chrysa does not visit the durward.", "logic": "\nWean(durward, chrysa)\nProx(chrysa)\nforall x (Wean(x, chrysa) -> Wean(chrysa, durward))\nforall x (Agree(x, chrysa) -> Agree(chrysa, durward))\nforall x (Wean(x, durward) -> not Agree(durward, chrysa))\nforall x (Prox(x) -> not Grout(x, durward))\nforall x (Grout(x, chrysa) -> Netted(chrysa))\nforall x (Prox(x) and Wean(x, durward) -> Prox(durward))\n\nnot Agree(chrysa, durward)\n\nforall x (Agree(x, chrysa) -> Agree(chrysa, durward)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The silvanus slat the marga. The marga is atrip. If someone slat the marga then the marga slat the silvanus. If someone overload the marga then the marga overload the silvanus. If someone slat the silvanus then the silvanus does not visit the marga. If someone is atrip then they do not chase the silvanus. If someone tarry the marga then the marga is evergreen. If someone is atrip and they like the silvanus then the silvanus is atrip. The marga is evergreen.", "logic": "\nSlat(silvanus, marga)\nAtrip(marga)\nforall x (Slat(x, marga) -> Slat(marga, silvanus))\nforall x (Overload(x, marga) -> Overload(marga, silvanus))\nforall x (Slat(x, silvanus) -> not Overload(silvanus, marga))\nforall x (Atrip(x) -> not Tarry(x, silvanus))\nforall x (Tarry(x, marga) -> Evergreen(marga))\nforall x (Atrip(x) and Slat(x, silvanus) -> Atrip(silvanus))\n\nEvergreen(marga)\n\nforall x (Tarry(x, marga) -> Evergreen(marga)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The elisa fidget the lucretia. The lucretia is reportable. If someone fidget the lucretia then the lucretia fidget the elisa. If someone glance the lucretia then the lucretia glance the elisa. If someone fidget the elisa then the elisa does not visit the lucretia. If someone is reportable then they do not chase the elisa. If someone sort the lucretia then the lucretia is sectarian. If someone is reportable and they like the elisa then the elisa is reportable. The elisa is not rough.", "logic": "\nFidget(elisa, lucretia)\nReportable(lucretia)\nforall x (Fidget(x, lucretia) -> Fidget(lucretia, elisa))\nforall x (Glance(x, lucretia) -> Glance(lucretia, elisa))\nforall x (Fidget(x, elisa) -> not Glance(elisa, lucretia))\nforall x (Reportable(x) -> not Sort(x, elisa))\nforall x (Sort(x, lucretia) -> Sectarian(lucretia))\nforall x (Reportable(x) and Fidget(x, elisa) -> Reportable(elisa))\n\nnot Rough(elisa)\n\nnot Rough(elisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The aloysia liberate the hagen. The hagen is romanian. If someone liberate the hagen then the hagen liberate the aloysia. If someone sculpt the hagen then the hagen sculpt the aloysia. If someone liberate the aloysia then the aloysia does not visit the hagen. If someone is romanian then they do not chase the aloysia. If someone deracinate the hagen then the hagen is gibbose. If someone is romanian and they like the aloysia then the aloysia is romanian. The hagen sculpt the hagen.", "logic": "\nLiberate(aloysia, hagen)\nRomanian(hagen)\nforall x (Liberate(x, hagen) -> Liberate(hagen, aloysia))\nforall x (Sculpt(x, hagen) -> Sculpt(hagen, aloysia))\nforall x (Liberate(x, aloysia) -> not Sculpt(aloysia, hagen))\nforall x (Romanian(x) -> not Deracinate(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Deracinate(x, hagen) -> Gibbose(hagen))\nforall x (Romanian(x) and Liberate(x, aloysia) -> Romanian(aloysia))\n\nSculpt(hagen, hagen)\n\nSculpt(hagen, hagen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The carlynn interlude the orelle. The orelle is defeasible. If someone interlude the orelle then the orelle interlude the carlynn. If someone saddle the orelle then the orelle saddle the carlynn. If someone interlude the carlynn then the carlynn does not visit the orelle. If someone is defeasible then they do not chase the carlynn. If someone wing the orelle then the orelle is ambivalent. If someone is defeasible and they like the carlynn then the carlynn is defeasible. The orelle is not rough.", "logic": "\nInterlude(carlynn, orelle)\nDefeasible(orelle)\nforall x (Interlude(x, orelle) -> Interlude(orelle, carlynn))\nforall x (Saddle(x, orelle) -> Saddle(orelle, carlynn))\nforall x (Interlude(x, carlynn) -> not Saddle(carlynn, orelle))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) -> not Wing(x, carlynn))\nforall x (Wing(x, orelle) -> Ambivalent(orelle))\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and Interlude(x, carlynn) -> Defeasible(carlynn))\n\nnot Rough(orelle)\n\nnot Rough(orelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The kynthia quetch the taffy. The taffy is zolaesque. If someone quetch the taffy then the taffy quetch the kynthia. If someone sham the taffy then the taffy sham the kynthia. If someone quetch the kynthia then the kynthia does not visit the taffy. If someone is zolaesque then they do not chase the kynthia. If someone fantasize the taffy then the taffy is rubicund. If someone is zolaesque and they like the kynthia then the kynthia is zolaesque. The kynthia fantasize the taffy.", "logic": "\nQuetch(kynthia, taffy)\nZolaesque(taffy)\nforall x (Quetch(x, taffy) -> Quetch(taffy, kynthia))\nforall x (Sham(x, taffy) -> Sham(taffy, kynthia))\nforall x (Quetch(x, kynthia) -> not Sham(kynthia, taffy))\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) -> not Fantasize(x, kynthia))\nforall x (Fantasize(x, taffy) -> Rubicund(taffy))\nforall x (Zolaesque(x) and Quetch(x, kynthia) -> Zolaesque(kynthia))\n\nFantasize(kynthia, taffy)\n\nFantasize(kynthia, taffy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The tuckie powderise the dorthea. The dorthea is sizzling. If someone powderise the dorthea then the dorthea powderise the tuckie. If someone raze the dorthea then the dorthea raze the tuckie. If someone powderise the tuckie then the tuckie does not visit the dorthea. If someone is sizzling then they do not chase the tuckie. If someone confess the dorthea then the dorthea is choky. If someone is sizzling and they like the tuckie then the tuckie is sizzling. The tuckie is not choky.", "logic": "\nPowderise(tuckie, dorthea)\nSizzling(dorthea)\nforall x (Powderise(x, dorthea) -> Powderise(dorthea, tuckie))\nforall x (Raze(x, dorthea) -> Raze(dorthea, tuckie))\nforall x (Powderise(x, tuckie) -> not Raze(tuckie, dorthea))\nforall x (Sizzling(x) -> not Confess(x, tuckie))\nforall x (Confess(x, dorthea) -> Choky(dorthea))\nforall x (Sizzling(x) and Powderise(x, tuckie) -> Sizzling(tuckie))\n\nnot Choky(tuckie)\n\nnot Choky(tuckie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "The pearline cypher the wake. The wake is wrecked. If someone cypher the wake then the wake cypher the pearline. If someone creep the wake then the wake creep the pearline. If someone cypher the pearline then the pearline does not visit the wake. If someone is wrecked then they do not chase the pearline. If someone orphan the wake then the wake is aleuronic. If someone is wrecked and they like the pearline then the pearline is wrecked. The pearline creep the pearline.", "logic": "\nCypher(pearline, wake)\nWrecked(wake)\nforall x (Cypher(x, wake) -> Cypher(wake, pearline))\nforall x (Creep(x, wake) -> Creep(wake, pearline))\nforall x (Cypher(x, pearline) -> not Creep(pearline, wake))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> not Orphan(x, pearline))\nforall x (Orphan(x, wake) -> Aleuronic(wake))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) and Cypher(x, pearline) -> Wrecked(pearline))\n\nCreep(pearline, pearline)\n\nCreep(pearline, pearline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1403"} {"premises": "Alicea is expected. Alicea is capetian. Alicea is motley. Alicea is defensive. Alicea is offsides. Alicea is nonviolent. Shlomo is expected. Shlomo is capetian. Shlomo is defensive. Shlomo is flabby. All nonviolent things are offsides. If something is capetian then it is nonviolent. Green, expected things are defensive. All nonviolent things are defensive. If Shlomo is offsides and Shlomo is defensive then Shlomo is not motley. If something is defensive and not capetian then it is flabby. Alicea is defensive.", "logic": "\nExpected(alicea)\nCapetian(alicea)\nMotley(alicea)\nDefensive(alicea)\nOffsides(alicea)\nNonviolent(alicea)\nExpected(shlomo)\nCapetian(shlomo)\nDefensive(shlomo)\nFlabby(shlomo)\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Capetian(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\nforall x (Capetian(x) and Expected(x) -> Defensive(x))\nforall x (Nonviolent(x) -> Defensive(x))\nOffsides(shlomo) and Defensive(shlomo) -> not Motley(shlomo)\nforall x (Defensive(x) and not Capetian(x) -> Flabby(x))\n\nDefensive(alicea)\n\ntherefore Defensive(alicea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Willetta is arduous. Willetta is seasoned. Willetta is beginning. Willetta is brimfull. Willetta is euphoriant. Willetta is mormon. Crystal is arduous. Crystal is seasoned. Crystal is brimfull. Crystal is capped. All mormon things are euphoriant. If something is seasoned then it is mormon. Green, arduous things are brimfull. All mormon things are brimfull. If Crystal is euphoriant and Crystal is brimfull then Crystal is not beginning. If something is brimfull and not seasoned then it is capped. Willetta is not seasoned.", "logic": "\nArduous(willetta)\nSeasoned(willetta)\nBeginning(willetta)\nBrimfull(willetta)\nEuphoriant(willetta)\nMormon(willetta)\nArduous(crystal)\nSeasoned(crystal)\nBrimfull(crystal)\nCapped(crystal)\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Euphoriant(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) -> Mormon(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) and Arduous(x) -> Brimfull(x))\nforall x (Mormon(x) -> Brimfull(x))\nEuphoriant(crystal) and Brimfull(crystal) -> not Beginning(crystal)\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and not Seasoned(x) -> Capped(x))\n\nnot Seasoned(willetta)\n\ntherefore Seasoned(willetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Cassandry is seamanly. Cassandry is juxtaposed. Cassandry is cypriot. Cassandry is depilatory. Cassandry is steely. Cassandry is niggling. Emelina is seamanly. Emelina is juxtaposed. Emelina is depilatory. Emelina is inspired. All niggling things are steely. If something is juxtaposed then it is niggling. Green, seamanly things are depilatory. All niggling things are depilatory. If Emelina is steely and Emelina is depilatory then Emelina is not cypriot. If something is depilatory and not juxtaposed then it is inspired. Emelina is niggling.", "logic": "\nSeamanly(cassandry)\nJuxtaposed(cassandry)\nCypriot(cassandry)\nDepilatory(cassandry)\nSteely(cassandry)\nNiggling(cassandry)\nSeamanly(emelina)\nJuxtaposed(emelina)\nDepilatory(emelina)\nInspired(emelina)\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Steely(x))\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Niggling(x))\nforall x (Juxtaposed(x) and Seamanly(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Depilatory(x))\nSteely(emelina) and Depilatory(emelina) -> not Cypriot(emelina)\nforall x (Depilatory(x) and not Juxtaposed(x) -> Inspired(x))\n\nNiggling(emelina)\n\nJuxtaposed(emelina) and forall x (Juxtaposed(x) -> Niggling(x)) -> therefore Niggling(emelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Baillie is stenosed. Baillie is dying. Baillie is incursive. Baillie is sibilant. Baillie is sadistic. Baillie is vapid. Konrad is stenosed. Konrad is dying. Konrad is sibilant. Konrad is believable. All vapid things are sadistic. If something is dying then it is vapid. Green, stenosed things are sibilant. All vapid things are sibilant. If Konrad is sadistic and Konrad is sibilant then Konrad is not incursive. If something is sibilant and not dying then it is believable. Konrad is not vapid.", "logic": "\nStenosed(baillie)\nDying(baillie)\nIncursive(baillie)\nSibilant(baillie)\nSadistic(baillie)\nVapid(baillie)\nStenosed(konrad)\nDying(konrad)\nSibilant(konrad)\nBelievable(konrad)\nforall x (Vapid(x) -> Sadistic(x))\nforall x (Dying(x) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Dying(x) and Stenosed(x) -> Sibilant(x))\nforall x (Vapid(x) -> Sibilant(x))\nSadistic(konrad) and Sibilant(konrad) -> not Incursive(konrad)\nforall x (Sibilant(x) and not Dying(x) -> Believable(x))\n\nnot Vapid(konrad)\n\nDying(konrad) and forall x (Dying(x) -> Vapid(x)) -> therefore Vapid(konrad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Feliza is abomasal. Feliza is grotty. Feliza is knowable. Feliza is russian. Feliza is stirring. Feliza is spaced. Phillipe is abomasal. Phillipe is grotty. Phillipe is russian. Phillipe is offending. All spaced things are stirring. If something is grotty then it is spaced. Green, abomasal things are russian. All spaced things are russian. If Phillipe is stirring and Phillipe is russian then Phillipe is not knowable. If something is russian and not grotty then it is offending. Phillipe is stirring.", "logic": "\nAbomasal(feliza)\nGrotty(feliza)\nKnowable(feliza)\nRussian(feliza)\nStirring(feliza)\nSpaced(feliza)\nAbomasal(phillipe)\nGrotty(phillipe)\nRussian(phillipe)\nOffending(phillipe)\nforall x (Spaced(x) -> Stirring(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) -> Spaced(x))\nforall x (Grotty(x) and Abomasal(x) -> Russian(x))\nforall x (Spaced(x) -> Russian(x))\nStirring(phillipe) and Russian(phillipe) -> not Knowable(phillipe)\nforall x (Russian(x) and not Grotty(x) -> Offending(x))\n\nStirring(phillipe)\n\nGrotty(phillipe) and forall x (Grotty(x) -> Spaced(x)) -> therefore Spaced(phillipe) Spaced(phillipe) and forall x (Spaced(x) -> Stirring(x)) -> therefore Stirring(phillipe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Suzette is synoptical. Suzette is balanced. Suzette is foolish. Suzette is hard. Suzette is deciphered. Suzette is sabbatic. Antone is synoptical. Antone is balanced. Antone is hard. Antone is postural. All sabbatic things are deciphered. If something is balanced then it is sabbatic. Green, synoptical things are hard. All sabbatic things are hard. If Antone is deciphered and Antone is hard then Antone is not foolish. If something is hard and not balanced then it is postural. Antone is not deciphered.", "logic": "\nSynoptical(suzette)\nBalanced(suzette)\nFoolish(suzette)\nHard(suzette)\nDeciphered(suzette)\nSabbatic(suzette)\nSynoptical(antone)\nBalanced(antone)\nHard(antone)\nPostural(antone)\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Deciphered(x))\nforall x (Balanced(x) -> Sabbatic(x))\nforall x (Balanced(x) and Synoptical(x) -> Hard(x))\nforall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Hard(x))\nDeciphered(antone) and Hard(antone) -> not Foolish(antone)\nforall x (Hard(x) and not Balanced(x) -> Postural(x))\n\nnot Deciphered(antone)\n\nBalanced(antone) and forall x (Balanced(x) -> Sabbatic(x)) -> therefore Sabbatic(antone) Sabbatic(antone) and forall x (Sabbatic(x) -> Deciphered(x)) -> therefore Deciphered(antone)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Hendrika is protecting. Hendrika is calendric. Hendrika is homeless. Hendrika is congestive. Hendrika is adonic. Hendrika is denuded. Trista is protecting. Trista is calendric. Trista is congestive. Trista is astatic. All denuded things are adonic. If something is calendric then it is denuded. Green, protecting things are congestive. All denuded things are congestive. If Trista is adonic and Trista is congestive then Trista is not homeless. If something is congestive and not calendric then it is astatic. Trista is not homeless.", "logic": "\nProtecting(hendrika)\nCalendric(hendrika)\nHomeless(hendrika)\nCongestive(hendrika)\nAdonic(hendrika)\nDenuded(hendrika)\nProtecting(trista)\nCalendric(trista)\nCongestive(trista)\nAstatic(trista)\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Adonic(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) -> Denuded(x))\nforall x (Calendric(x) and Protecting(x) -> Congestive(x))\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> Congestive(x))\nAdonic(trista) and Congestive(trista) -> not Homeless(trista)\nforall x (Congestive(x) and not Calendric(x) -> Astatic(x))\n\nnot Homeless(trista)\n\nCalendric(trista) and forall x (Calendric(x) -> Denuded(x)) -> therefore Denuded(trista) Denuded(trista) and forall x (Denuded(x) -> Adonic(x)) -> therefore Adonic(trista) Adonic(trista) and Congestive(trista) and Adonic(trista) and Congestive(trista) -> not Homeless(trista) -> therefore not Homeless(trista)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "Aloysia is kashmiri. Aloysia is crenate. Aloysia is lentic. Aloysia is runty. Aloysia is maudlin. Aloysia is torpid. Cecilia is kashmiri. Cecilia is crenate. Cecilia is runty. Cecilia is menopausal. All torpid things are maudlin. If something is crenate then it is torpid. Green, kashmiri things are runty. All torpid things are runty. If Cecilia is maudlin and Cecilia is runty then Cecilia is not lentic. If something is runty and not crenate then it is menopausal. Cecilia is lentic.", "logic": "\nKashmiri(aloysia)\nCrenate(aloysia)\nLentic(aloysia)\nRunty(aloysia)\nMaudlin(aloysia)\nTorpid(aloysia)\nKashmiri(cecilia)\nCrenate(cecilia)\nRunty(cecilia)\nMenopausal(cecilia)\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Crenate(x) -> Torpid(x))\nforall x (Crenate(x) and Kashmiri(x) -> Runty(x))\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Runty(x))\nMaudlin(cecilia) and Runty(cecilia) -> not Lentic(cecilia)\nforall x (Runty(x) and not Crenate(x) -> Menopausal(x))\n\nLentic(cecilia)\n\nCrenate(cecilia) and forall x (Crenate(x) -> Torpid(x)) -> therefore Torpid(cecilia) Torpid(cecilia) and forall x (Torpid(x) -> Maudlin(x)) -> therefore Maudlin(cecilia) Maudlin(cecilia) and Runty(cecilia) and Maudlin(cecilia) and Runty(cecilia) -> not Lentic(cecilia) -> therefore not Lentic(cecilia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1494"} {"premises": "The jeth seclude the fleurette. The brandie is not tinkly. The brandie is racking. The brandie is not toothlike. The brandie mothproof the tobie. The brandie mothproof the fleurette. The tobie seclude the jeth. The tobie seclude the brandie. The tobie is liked. The tobie distress the fleurette. The fleurette seclude the brandie. The fleurette seclude the tobie. The fleurette is liked. The fleurette is workaday. The fleurette is racking. The fleurette distress the brandie. If something mothproof the fleurette then it distress the brandie. If something is toothlike then it distress the brandie. If something is toothlike and it seclude the fleurette then the fleurette distress the tobie. If something mothproof the tobie then it mothproof the fleurette. If something is racking and it seclude the tobie then it seclude the fleurette. If something seclude the fleurette and it is racking then the fleurette is toothlike. If something distress the tobie and the tobie distress the fleurette then the tobie seclude the jeth. If something seclude the brandie and the brandie does not see the fleurette then the fleurette is tinkly. The jeth seclude the fleurette.", "logic": "\nSeclude(jeth, fleurette)\nnot Tinkly(brandie)\nRacking(brandie)\nnot Toothlike(brandie)\nMothproof(brandie, tobie)\nMothproof(brandie, fleurette)\nSeclude(tobie, jeth)\nSeclude(tobie, brandie)\nLiked(tobie)\nDistress(tobie, fleurette)\nSeclude(fleurette, brandie)\nSeclude(fleurette, tobie)\nLiked(fleurette)\nWorkaday(fleurette)\nRacking(fleurette)\nDistress(fleurette, brandie)\nforall x (Mothproof(x, fleurette) -> Distress(x, brandie))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) -> Distress(x, brandie))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) and Seclude(x, fleurette) -> Distress(fleurette, tobie))\nforall x (Mothproof(x, tobie) -> Mothproof(x, fleurette))\nforall x (Racking(x) and Seclude(x, tobie) -> Seclude(x, fleurette))\nforall x (Seclude(x, fleurette) and Racking(x) -> Toothlike(fleurette))\nforall x (Distress(x, tobie) and Distress(tobie, fleurette) -> Seclude(tobie, jeth))\nforall x (Seclude(x, brandie) and not Distress(brandie, fleurette) -> Tinkly(fleurette))\n\nSeclude(jeth, fleurette)\n\ntherefore Seclude(jeth, fleurette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The randee legitimate the beulah. The thaddus is not gestural. The thaddus is radiopaque. The thaddus is not unifoliate. The thaddus organize the andrei. The thaddus organize the beulah. The andrei legitimate the randee. The andrei legitimate the thaddus. The andrei is analytical. The andrei caper the beulah. The beulah legitimate the thaddus. The beulah legitimate the andrei. The beulah is analytical. The beulah is benumbed. The beulah is radiopaque. The beulah caper the thaddus. If something organize the beulah then it caper the thaddus. If something is unifoliate then it caper the thaddus. If something is unifoliate and it legitimate the beulah then the beulah caper the andrei. If something organize the andrei then it organize the beulah. If something is radiopaque and it legitimate the andrei then it legitimate the beulah. If something legitimate the beulah and it is radiopaque then the beulah is unifoliate. If something caper the andrei and the andrei caper the beulah then the andrei legitimate the randee. If something legitimate the thaddus and the thaddus does not see the beulah then the beulah is gestural. The thaddus is not radiopaque.", "logic": "\nLegitimate(randee, beulah)\nnot Gestural(thaddus)\nRadiopaque(thaddus)\nnot Unifoliate(thaddus)\nOrganize(thaddus, andrei)\nOrganize(thaddus, beulah)\nLegitimate(andrei, randee)\nLegitimate(andrei, thaddus)\nAnalytical(andrei)\nCaper(andrei, beulah)\nLegitimate(beulah, thaddus)\nLegitimate(beulah, andrei)\nAnalytical(beulah)\nBenumbed(beulah)\nRadiopaque(beulah)\nCaper(beulah, thaddus)\nforall x (Organize(x, beulah) -> Caper(x, thaddus))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) -> Caper(x, thaddus))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) and Legitimate(x, beulah) -> Caper(beulah, andrei))\nforall x (Organize(x, andrei) -> Organize(x, beulah))\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) and Legitimate(x, andrei) -> Legitimate(x, beulah))\nforall x (Legitimate(x, beulah) and Radiopaque(x) -> Unifoliate(beulah))\nforall x (Caper(x, andrei) and Caper(andrei, beulah) -> Legitimate(andrei, randee))\nforall x (Legitimate(x, thaddus) and not Caper(thaddus, beulah) -> Gestural(beulah))\n\nnot Radiopaque(thaddus)\n\ntherefore Radiopaque(thaddus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The ada piss the dinnie. The megan is not untrimmed. The megan is splashy. The megan is not perceptual. The megan unfreeze the ronica. The megan unfreeze the dinnie. The ronica piss the ada. The ronica piss the megan. The ronica is asternal. The ronica reuse the dinnie. The dinnie piss the megan. The dinnie piss the ronica. The dinnie is asternal. The dinnie is relieved. The dinnie is splashy. The dinnie reuse the megan. If something unfreeze the dinnie then it reuse the megan. If something is perceptual then it reuse the megan. If something is perceptual and it piss the dinnie then the dinnie reuse the ronica. If something unfreeze the ronica then it unfreeze the dinnie. If something is splashy and it piss the ronica then it piss the dinnie. If something piss the dinnie and it is splashy then the dinnie is perceptual. If something reuse the ronica and the ronica reuse the dinnie then the ronica piss the ada. If something piss the megan and the megan does not see the dinnie then the dinnie is untrimmed. The dinnie piss the dinnie.", "logic": "\nPiss(ada, dinnie)\nnot Untrimmed(megan)\nSplashy(megan)\nnot Perceptual(megan)\nUnfreeze(megan, ronica)\nUnfreeze(megan, dinnie)\nPiss(ronica, ada)\nPiss(ronica, megan)\nAsternal(ronica)\nReuse(ronica, dinnie)\nPiss(dinnie, megan)\nPiss(dinnie, ronica)\nAsternal(dinnie)\nRelieved(dinnie)\nSplashy(dinnie)\nReuse(dinnie, megan)\nforall x (Unfreeze(x, dinnie) -> Reuse(x, megan))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) -> Reuse(x, megan))\nforall x (Perceptual(x) and Piss(x, dinnie) -> Reuse(dinnie, ronica))\nforall x (Unfreeze(x, ronica) -> Unfreeze(x, dinnie))\nforall x (Splashy(x) and Piss(x, ronica) -> Piss(x, dinnie))\nforall x (Piss(x, dinnie) and Splashy(x) -> Perceptual(dinnie))\nforall x (Reuse(x, ronica) and Reuse(ronica, dinnie) -> Piss(ronica, ada))\nforall x (Piss(x, megan) and not Reuse(megan, dinnie) -> Untrimmed(dinnie))\n\nPiss(dinnie, dinnie)\n\nSplashy(dinnie) and Piss(dinnie, ronica) and forall x (Splashy(x) and Piss(x, ronica) -> Piss(x, dinnie)) -> therefore Piss(dinnie, dinnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The agneta scamper the garfield. The brian is not payable. The brian is zambian. The brian is not vatic. The brian drum the gussie. The brian drum the garfield. The gussie scamper the agneta. The gussie scamper the brian. The gussie is nonfissile. The gussie derive the garfield. The garfield scamper the brian. The garfield scamper the gussie. The garfield is nonfissile. The garfield is tailored. The garfield is zambian. The garfield derive the brian. If something drum the garfield then it derive the brian. If something is vatic then it derive the brian. If something is vatic and it scamper the garfield then the garfield derive the gussie. If something drum the gussie then it drum the garfield. If something is zambian and it scamper the gussie then it scamper the garfield. If something scamper the garfield and it is zambian then the garfield is vatic. If something derive the gussie and the gussie derive the garfield then the gussie scamper the agneta. If something scamper the brian and the brian does not see the garfield then the garfield is payable. The brian does not see the brian.", "logic": "\nScamper(agneta, garfield)\nnot Payable(brian)\nZambian(brian)\nnot Vatic(brian)\nDrum(brian, gussie)\nDrum(brian, garfield)\nScamper(gussie, agneta)\nScamper(gussie, brian)\nNonfissile(gussie)\nDerive(gussie, garfield)\nScamper(garfield, brian)\nScamper(garfield, gussie)\nNonfissile(garfield)\nTailored(garfield)\nZambian(garfield)\nDerive(garfield, brian)\nforall x (Drum(x, garfield) -> Derive(x, brian))\nforall x (Vatic(x) -> Derive(x, brian))\nforall x (Vatic(x) and Scamper(x, garfield) -> Derive(garfield, gussie))\nforall x (Drum(x, gussie) -> Drum(x, garfield))\nforall x (Zambian(x) and Scamper(x, gussie) -> Scamper(x, garfield))\nforall x (Scamper(x, garfield) and Zambian(x) -> Vatic(garfield))\nforall x (Derive(x, gussie) and Derive(gussie, garfield) -> Scamper(gussie, agneta))\nforall x (Scamper(x, brian) and not Derive(brian, garfield) -> Payable(garfield))\n\nnot Derive(brian, brian)\n\nDrum(brian, garfield) and forall x (Drum(x, garfield) -> Derive(x, brian)) -> therefore Derive(brian, brian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The bernita houseclean the chrissy. The terra is not cockney. The terra is coarsened. The terra is not ismaili. The terra cringe the reta. The terra cringe the chrissy. The reta houseclean the bernita. The reta houseclean the terra. The reta is gingerly. The reta mudwrestle the chrissy. The chrissy houseclean the terra. The chrissy houseclean the reta. The chrissy is gingerly. The chrissy is galled. The chrissy is coarsened. The chrissy mudwrestle the terra. If something cringe the chrissy then it mudwrestle the terra. If something is ismaili then it mudwrestle the terra. If something is ismaili and it houseclean the chrissy then the chrissy mudwrestle the reta. If something cringe the reta then it cringe the chrissy. If something is coarsened and it houseclean the reta then it houseclean the chrissy. If something houseclean the chrissy and it is coarsened then the chrissy is ismaili. If something mudwrestle the reta and the reta mudwrestle the chrissy then the reta houseclean the bernita. If something houseclean the terra and the terra does not see the chrissy then the chrissy is cockney. The chrissy is ismaili.", "logic": "\nHouseclean(bernita, chrissy)\nnot Cockney(terra)\nCoarsened(terra)\nnot Ismaili(terra)\nCringe(terra, reta)\nCringe(terra, chrissy)\nHouseclean(reta, bernita)\nHouseclean(reta, terra)\nGingerly(reta)\nMudwrestle(reta, chrissy)\nHouseclean(chrissy, terra)\nHouseclean(chrissy, reta)\nGingerly(chrissy)\nGalled(chrissy)\nCoarsened(chrissy)\nMudwrestle(chrissy, terra)\nforall x (Cringe(x, chrissy) -> Mudwrestle(x, terra))\nforall x (Ismaili(x) -> Mudwrestle(x, terra))\nforall x (Ismaili(x) and Houseclean(x, chrissy) -> Mudwrestle(chrissy, reta))\nforall x (Cringe(x, reta) -> Cringe(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Coarsened(x) and Houseclean(x, reta) -> Houseclean(x, chrissy))\nforall x (Houseclean(x, chrissy) and Coarsened(x) -> Ismaili(chrissy))\nforall x (Mudwrestle(x, reta) and Mudwrestle(reta, chrissy) -> Houseclean(reta, bernita))\nforall x (Houseclean(x, terra) and not Mudwrestle(terra, chrissy) -> Cockney(chrissy))\n\nIsmaili(chrissy)\n\nCoarsened(chrissy) and Houseclean(chrissy, reta) and forall x (Coarsened(x) and Houseclean(x, reta) -> Houseclean(x, chrissy)) -> therefore Houseclean(chrissy, chrissy) Houseclean(chrissy, chrissy) and Coarsened(chrissy) and forall x (Houseclean(x, chrissy) and Coarsened(x) -> Ismaili(chrissy)) -> therefore Ismaili(chrissy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The tiff unloosen the alisa. The valery is not ambitious. The valery is curly. The valery is not spellbound. The valery weaponize the melicent. The valery weaponize the alisa. The melicent unloosen the tiff. The melicent unloosen the valery. The melicent is pupillary. The melicent swallow the alisa. The alisa unloosen the valery. The alisa unloosen the melicent. The alisa is pupillary. The alisa is laudable. The alisa is curly. The alisa swallow the valery. If something weaponize the alisa then it swallow the valery. If something is spellbound then it swallow the valery. If something is spellbound and it unloosen the alisa then the alisa swallow the melicent. If something weaponize the melicent then it weaponize the alisa. If something is curly and it unloosen the melicent then it unloosen the alisa. If something unloosen the alisa and it is curly then the alisa is spellbound. If something swallow the melicent and the melicent swallow the alisa then the melicent unloosen the tiff. If something unloosen the valery and the valery does not see the alisa then the alisa is ambitious. The alisa is not spellbound.", "logic": "\nUnloosen(tiff, alisa)\nnot Ambitious(valery)\nCurly(valery)\nnot Spellbound(valery)\nWeaponize(valery, melicent)\nWeaponize(valery, alisa)\nUnloosen(melicent, tiff)\nUnloosen(melicent, valery)\nPupillary(melicent)\nSwallow(melicent, alisa)\nUnloosen(alisa, valery)\nUnloosen(alisa, melicent)\nPupillary(alisa)\nLaudable(alisa)\nCurly(alisa)\nSwallow(alisa, valery)\nforall x (Weaponize(x, alisa) -> Swallow(x, valery))\nforall x (Spellbound(x) -> Swallow(x, valery))\nforall x (Spellbound(x) and Unloosen(x, alisa) -> Swallow(alisa, melicent))\nforall x (Weaponize(x, melicent) -> Weaponize(x, alisa))\nforall x (Curly(x) and Unloosen(x, melicent) -> Unloosen(x, alisa))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, alisa) and Curly(x) -> Spellbound(alisa))\nforall x (Swallow(x, melicent) and Swallow(melicent, alisa) -> Unloosen(melicent, tiff))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, valery) and not Swallow(valery, alisa) -> Ambitious(alisa))\n\nnot Spellbound(alisa)\n\nCurly(alisa) and Unloosen(alisa, melicent) and forall x (Curly(x) and Unloosen(x, melicent) -> Unloosen(x, alisa)) -> therefore Unloosen(alisa, alisa) Unloosen(alisa, alisa) and Curly(alisa) and forall x (Unloosen(x, alisa) and Curly(x) -> Spellbound(alisa)) -> therefore Spellbound(alisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The daffi malinger the arlinda. The gonzalo is not occipital. The gonzalo is poetical. The gonzalo is not sportive. The gonzalo tantalize the issy. The gonzalo tantalize the arlinda. The issy malinger the daffi. The issy malinger the gonzalo. The issy is congolese. The issy devitalise the arlinda. The arlinda malinger the gonzalo. The arlinda malinger the issy. The arlinda is congolese. The arlinda is unwoven. The arlinda is poetical. The arlinda devitalise the gonzalo. If something tantalize the arlinda then it devitalise the gonzalo. If something is sportive then it devitalise the gonzalo. If something is sportive and it malinger the arlinda then the arlinda devitalise the issy. If something tantalize the issy then it tantalize the arlinda. If something is poetical and it malinger the issy then it malinger the arlinda. If something malinger the arlinda and it is poetical then the arlinda is sportive. If something devitalise the issy and the issy devitalise the arlinda then the issy malinger the daffi. If something malinger the gonzalo and the gonzalo does not see the arlinda then the arlinda is occipital. The arlinda devitalise the issy.", "logic": "\nMalinger(daffi, arlinda)\nnot Occipital(gonzalo)\nPoetical(gonzalo)\nnot Sportive(gonzalo)\nTantalize(gonzalo, issy)\nTantalize(gonzalo, arlinda)\nMalinger(issy, daffi)\nMalinger(issy, gonzalo)\nCongolese(issy)\nDevitalise(issy, arlinda)\nMalinger(arlinda, gonzalo)\nMalinger(arlinda, issy)\nCongolese(arlinda)\nUnwoven(arlinda)\nPoetical(arlinda)\nDevitalise(arlinda, gonzalo)\nforall x (Tantalize(x, arlinda) -> Devitalise(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Sportive(x) -> Devitalise(x, gonzalo))\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Malinger(x, arlinda) -> Devitalise(arlinda, issy))\nforall x (Tantalize(x, issy) -> Tantalize(x, arlinda))\nforall x (Poetical(x) and Malinger(x, issy) -> Malinger(x, arlinda))\nforall x (Malinger(x, arlinda) and Poetical(x) -> Sportive(arlinda))\nforall x (Devitalise(x, issy) and Devitalise(issy, arlinda) -> Malinger(issy, daffi))\nforall x (Malinger(x, gonzalo) and not Devitalise(gonzalo, arlinda) -> Occipital(arlinda))\n\nDevitalise(arlinda, issy)\n\nPoetical(arlinda) and Malinger(arlinda, issy) and forall x (Poetical(x) and Malinger(x, issy) -> Malinger(x, arlinda)) -> therefore Malinger(arlinda, arlinda) Malinger(arlinda, arlinda) and Poetical(arlinda) and forall x (Malinger(x, arlinda) and Poetical(x) -> Sportive(arlinda)) -> therefore Sportive(arlinda) Poetical(arlinda) and Malinger(arlinda, issy) and forall x (Poetical(x) and Malinger(x, issy) -> Malinger(x, arlinda)) -> therefore Malinger(arlinda, arlinda) Sportive(arlinda) and Malinger(arlinda, arlinda) and forall x (Sportive(x) and Malinger(x, arlinda) -> Devitalise(arlinda, issy)) -> therefore Devitalise(arlinda, issy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The davie simonize the charlotta. The corrie is not neurologic. The corrie is iron. The corrie is not improbable. The corrie stimulate the shepherd. The corrie stimulate the charlotta. The shepherd simonize the davie. The shepherd simonize the corrie. The shepherd is cuttable. The shepherd forecast the charlotta. The charlotta simonize the corrie. The charlotta simonize the shepherd. The charlotta is cuttable. The charlotta is amnesiac. The charlotta is iron. The charlotta forecast the corrie. If something stimulate the charlotta then it forecast the corrie. If something is improbable then it forecast the corrie. If something is improbable and it simonize the charlotta then the charlotta forecast the shepherd. If something stimulate the shepherd then it stimulate the charlotta. If something is iron and it simonize the shepherd then it simonize the charlotta. If something simonize the charlotta and it is iron then the charlotta is improbable. If something forecast the shepherd and the shepherd forecast the charlotta then the shepherd simonize the davie. If something simonize the corrie and the corrie does not see the charlotta then the charlotta is neurologic. The charlotta does not see the shepherd.", "logic": "\nSimonize(davie, charlotta)\nnot Neurologic(corrie)\nIron(corrie)\nnot Improbable(corrie)\nStimulate(corrie, shepherd)\nStimulate(corrie, charlotta)\nSimonize(shepherd, davie)\nSimonize(shepherd, corrie)\nCuttable(shepherd)\nForecast(shepherd, charlotta)\nSimonize(charlotta, corrie)\nSimonize(charlotta, shepherd)\nCuttable(charlotta)\nAmnesiac(charlotta)\nIron(charlotta)\nForecast(charlotta, corrie)\nforall x (Stimulate(x, charlotta) -> Forecast(x, corrie))\nforall x (Improbable(x) -> Forecast(x, corrie))\nforall x (Improbable(x) and Simonize(x, charlotta) -> Forecast(charlotta, shepherd))\nforall x (Stimulate(x, shepherd) -> Stimulate(x, charlotta))\nforall x (Iron(x) and Simonize(x, shepherd) -> Simonize(x, charlotta))\nforall x (Simonize(x, charlotta) and Iron(x) -> Improbable(charlotta))\nforall x (Forecast(x, shepherd) and Forecast(shepherd, charlotta) -> Simonize(shepherd, davie))\nforall x (Simonize(x, corrie) and not Forecast(corrie, charlotta) -> Neurologic(charlotta))\n\nnot Forecast(charlotta, shepherd)\n\nIron(charlotta) and Simonize(charlotta, shepherd) and forall x (Iron(x) and Simonize(x, shepherd) -> Simonize(x, charlotta)) -> therefore Simonize(charlotta, charlotta) Simonize(charlotta, charlotta) and Iron(charlotta) and forall x (Simonize(x, charlotta) and Iron(x) -> Improbable(charlotta)) -> therefore Improbable(charlotta) Iron(charlotta) and Simonize(charlotta, shepherd) and forall x (Iron(x) and Simonize(x, shepherd) -> Simonize(x, charlotta)) -> therefore Simonize(charlotta, charlotta) Improbable(charlotta) and Simonize(charlotta, charlotta) and forall x (Improbable(x) and Simonize(x, charlotta) -> Forecast(charlotta, shepherd)) -> therefore Forecast(charlotta, shepherd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The orsa transgress the lon. The mickey is not combed. The mickey is novel. The mickey is not untenable. The mickey ache the arabella. The mickey ache the lon. The arabella transgress the orsa. The arabella transgress the mickey. The arabella is minimized. The arabella intrench the lon. The lon transgress the mickey. The lon transgress the arabella. The lon is minimized. The lon is blazing. The lon is novel. The lon intrench the mickey. If something ache the lon then it intrench the mickey. If something is untenable then it intrench the mickey. If something is untenable and it transgress the lon then the lon intrench the arabella. If something ache the arabella then it ache the lon. If something is novel and it transgress the arabella then it transgress the lon. If something transgress the lon and it is novel then the lon is untenable. If something intrench the arabella and the arabella intrench the lon then the arabella transgress the orsa. If something transgress the mickey and the mickey does not see the lon then the lon is combed. The lon does not need the lon.", "logic": "\nTransgress(orsa, lon)\nnot Combed(mickey)\nNovel(mickey)\nnot Untenable(mickey)\nAche(mickey, arabella)\nAche(mickey, lon)\nTransgress(arabella, orsa)\nTransgress(arabella, mickey)\nMinimized(arabella)\nIntrench(arabella, lon)\nTransgress(lon, mickey)\nTransgress(lon, arabella)\nMinimized(lon)\nBlazing(lon)\nNovel(lon)\nIntrench(lon, mickey)\nforall x (Ache(x, lon) -> Intrench(x, mickey))\nforall x (Untenable(x) -> Intrench(x, mickey))\nforall x (Untenable(x) and Transgress(x, lon) -> Intrench(lon, arabella))\nforall x (Ache(x, arabella) -> Ache(x, lon))\nforall x (Novel(x) and Transgress(x, arabella) -> Transgress(x, lon))\nforall x (Transgress(x, lon) and Novel(x) -> Untenable(lon))\nforall x (Intrench(x, arabella) and Intrench(arabella, lon) -> Transgress(arabella, orsa))\nforall x (Transgress(x, mickey) and not Intrench(mickey, lon) -> Combed(lon))\n\nnot Ache(lon, lon)\n\nforall x (Ache(x, arabella) -> Ache(x, lon)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The karna specialise the storm. The noam is not collect. The noam is detractive. The noam is not awing. The noam mush the juliet. The noam mush the storm. The juliet specialise the karna. The juliet specialise the noam. The juliet is victimized. The juliet smother the storm. The storm specialise the noam. The storm specialise the juliet. The storm is victimized. The storm is clean. The storm is detractive. The storm smother the noam. If something mush the storm then it smother the noam. If something is awing then it smother the noam. If something is awing and it specialise the storm then the storm smother the juliet. If something mush the juliet then it mush the storm. If something is detractive and it specialise the juliet then it specialise the storm. If something specialise the storm and it is detractive then the storm is awing. If something smother the juliet and the juliet smother the storm then the juliet specialise the karna. If something specialise the noam and the noam does not see the storm then the storm is collect. The karna mush the storm.", "logic": "\nSpecialise(karna, storm)\nnot Collect(noam)\nDetractive(noam)\nnot Awing(noam)\nMush(noam, juliet)\nMush(noam, storm)\nSpecialise(juliet, karna)\nSpecialise(juliet, noam)\nVictimized(juliet)\nSmother(juliet, storm)\nSpecialise(storm, noam)\nSpecialise(storm, juliet)\nVictimized(storm)\nClean(storm)\nDetractive(storm)\nSmother(storm, noam)\nforall x (Mush(x, storm) -> Smother(x, noam))\nforall x (Awing(x) -> Smother(x, noam))\nforall x (Awing(x) and Specialise(x, storm) -> Smother(storm, juliet))\nforall x (Mush(x, juliet) -> Mush(x, storm))\nforall x (Detractive(x) and Specialise(x, juliet) -> Specialise(x, storm))\nforall x (Specialise(x, storm) and Detractive(x) -> Awing(storm))\nforall x (Smother(x, juliet) and Smother(juliet, storm) -> Specialise(juliet, karna))\nforall x (Specialise(x, noam) and not Smother(noam, storm) -> Collect(storm))\n\nMush(karna, storm)\n\nforall x (Mush(x, juliet) -> Mush(x, storm)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The allen telegraph the morna. The giancarlo is not trousered. The giancarlo is demented. The giancarlo is not selected. The giancarlo adjure the munroe. The giancarlo adjure the morna. The munroe telegraph the allen. The munroe telegraph the giancarlo. The munroe is remorseful. The munroe misconduct the morna. The morna telegraph the giancarlo. The morna telegraph the munroe. The morna is remorseful. The morna is million. The morna is demented. The morna misconduct the giancarlo. If something adjure the morna then it misconduct the giancarlo. If something is selected then it misconduct the giancarlo. If something is selected and it telegraph the morna then the morna misconduct the munroe. If something adjure the munroe then it adjure the morna. If something is demented and it telegraph the munroe then it telegraph the morna. If something telegraph the morna and it is demented then the morna is selected. If something misconduct the munroe and the munroe misconduct the morna then the munroe telegraph the allen. If something telegraph the giancarlo and the giancarlo does not see the morna then the morna is trousered. The giancarlo does not chase the morna.", "logic": "\nTelegraph(allen, morna)\nnot Trousered(giancarlo)\nDemented(giancarlo)\nnot Selected(giancarlo)\nAdjure(giancarlo, munroe)\nAdjure(giancarlo, morna)\nTelegraph(munroe, allen)\nTelegraph(munroe, giancarlo)\nRemorseful(munroe)\nMisconduct(munroe, morna)\nTelegraph(morna, giancarlo)\nTelegraph(morna, munroe)\nRemorseful(morna)\nMillion(morna)\nDemented(morna)\nMisconduct(morna, giancarlo)\nforall x (Adjure(x, morna) -> Misconduct(x, giancarlo))\nforall x (Selected(x) -> Misconduct(x, giancarlo))\nforall x (Selected(x) and Telegraph(x, morna) -> Misconduct(morna, munroe))\nforall x (Adjure(x, munroe) -> Adjure(x, morna))\nforall x (Demented(x) and Telegraph(x, munroe) -> Telegraph(x, morna))\nforall x (Telegraph(x, morna) and Demented(x) -> Selected(morna))\nforall x (Misconduct(x, munroe) and Misconduct(munroe, morna) -> Telegraph(munroe, allen))\nforall x (Telegraph(x, giancarlo) and not Misconduct(giancarlo, morna) -> Trousered(morna))\n\nnot Telegraph(giancarlo, morna)\n\nforall x (Demented(x) and Telegraph(x, munroe) -> Telegraph(x, morna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The ursola swoosh the sherlocke. The carlisle is not commensal. The carlisle is polish. The carlisle is not fractious. The carlisle blockade the kendra. The carlisle blockade the sherlocke. The kendra swoosh the ursola. The kendra swoosh the carlisle. The kendra is nauseous. The kendra jail the sherlocke. The sherlocke swoosh the carlisle. The sherlocke swoosh the kendra. The sherlocke is nauseous. The sherlocke is irascible. The sherlocke is polish. The sherlocke jail the carlisle. If something blockade the sherlocke then it jail the carlisle. If something is fractious then it jail the carlisle. If something is fractious and it swoosh the sherlocke then the sherlocke jail the kendra. If something blockade the kendra then it blockade the sherlocke. If something is polish and it swoosh the kendra then it swoosh the sherlocke. If something swoosh the sherlocke and it is polish then the sherlocke is fractious. If something jail the kendra and the kendra jail the sherlocke then the kendra swoosh the ursola. If something swoosh the carlisle and the carlisle does not see the sherlocke then the sherlocke is commensal. The kendra jail the carlisle.", "logic": "\nSwoosh(ursola, sherlocke)\nnot Commensal(carlisle)\nPolish(carlisle)\nnot Fractious(carlisle)\nBlockade(carlisle, kendra)\nBlockade(carlisle, sherlocke)\nSwoosh(kendra, ursola)\nSwoosh(kendra, carlisle)\nNauseous(kendra)\nJail(kendra, sherlocke)\nSwoosh(sherlocke, carlisle)\nSwoosh(sherlocke, kendra)\nNauseous(sherlocke)\nIrascible(sherlocke)\nPolish(sherlocke)\nJail(sherlocke, carlisle)\nforall x (Blockade(x, sherlocke) -> Jail(x, carlisle))\nforall x (Fractious(x) -> Jail(x, carlisle))\nforall x (Fractious(x) and Swoosh(x, sherlocke) -> Jail(sherlocke, kendra))\nforall x (Blockade(x, kendra) -> Blockade(x, sherlocke))\nforall x (Polish(x) and Swoosh(x, kendra) -> Swoosh(x, sherlocke))\nforall x (Swoosh(x, sherlocke) and Polish(x) -> Fractious(sherlocke))\nforall x (Jail(x, kendra) and Jail(kendra, sherlocke) -> Swoosh(kendra, ursola))\nforall x (Swoosh(x, carlisle) and not Jail(carlisle, sherlocke) -> Commensal(sherlocke))\n\nJail(kendra, carlisle)\n\nforall x (Blockade(x, sherlocke) -> Jail(x, carlisle)) <- forall x (Blockade(x, kendra) -> Blockade(x, sherlocke)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The zorana border the wilmer. The clemence is not overt. The clemence is descending. The clemence is not inconstant. The clemence sunder the amandi. The clemence sunder the wilmer. The amandi border the zorana. The amandi border the clemence. The amandi is wigless. The amandi near the wilmer. The wilmer border the clemence. The wilmer border the amandi. The wilmer is wigless. The wilmer is squishy. The wilmer is descending. The wilmer near the clemence. If something sunder the wilmer then it near the clemence. If something is inconstant then it near the clemence. If something is inconstant and it border the wilmer then the wilmer near the amandi. If something sunder the amandi then it sunder the wilmer. If something is descending and it border the amandi then it border the wilmer. If something border the wilmer and it is descending then the wilmer is inconstant. If something near the amandi and the amandi near the wilmer then the amandi border the zorana. If something border the clemence and the clemence does not see the wilmer then the wilmer is overt. The zorana does not need the zorana.", "logic": "\nBorder(zorana, wilmer)\nnot Overt(clemence)\nDescending(clemence)\nnot Inconstant(clemence)\nSunder(clemence, amandi)\nSunder(clemence, wilmer)\nBorder(amandi, zorana)\nBorder(amandi, clemence)\nWigless(amandi)\nNear(amandi, wilmer)\nBorder(wilmer, clemence)\nBorder(wilmer, amandi)\nWigless(wilmer)\nSquishy(wilmer)\nDescending(wilmer)\nNear(wilmer, clemence)\nforall x (Sunder(x, wilmer) -> Near(x, clemence))\nforall x (Inconstant(x) -> Near(x, clemence))\nforall x (Inconstant(x) and Border(x, wilmer) -> Near(wilmer, amandi))\nforall x (Sunder(x, amandi) -> Sunder(x, wilmer))\nforall x (Descending(x) and Border(x, amandi) -> Border(x, wilmer))\nforall x (Border(x, wilmer) and Descending(x) -> Inconstant(wilmer))\nforall x (Near(x, amandi) and Near(amandi, wilmer) -> Border(amandi, zorana))\nforall x (Border(x, clemence) and not Near(clemence, wilmer) -> Overt(wilmer))\n\nnot Sunder(zorana, zorana)\n\nnot Sunder(zorana, zorana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The zalman angulate the wyatt. The xymenes is not fucking. The xymenes is prodromic. The xymenes is not daft. The xymenes remodel the regan. The xymenes remodel the wyatt. The regan angulate the zalman. The regan angulate the xymenes. The regan is preemptive. The regan land the wyatt. The wyatt angulate the xymenes. The wyatt angulate the regan. The wyatt is preemptive. The wyatt is chorionic. The wyatt is prodromic. The wyatt land the xymenes. If something remodel the wyatt then it land the xymenes. If something is daft then it land the xymenes. If something is daft and it angulate the wyatt then the wyatt land the regan. If something remodel the regan then it remodel the wyatt. If something is prodromic and it angulate the regan then it angulate the wyatt. If something angulate the wyatt and it is prodromic then the wyatt is daft. If something land the regan and the regan land the wyatt then the regan angulate the zalman. If something angulate the xymenes and the xymenes does not see the wyatt then the wyatt is fucking. The wyatt remodel the zalman.", "logic": "\nAngulate(zalman, wyatt)\nnot Fucking(xymenes)\nProdromic(xymenes)\nnot Daft(xymenes)\nRemodel(xymenes, regan)\nRemodel(xymenes, wyatt)\nAngulate(regan, zalman)\nAngulate(regan, xymenes)\nPreemptive(regan)\nLand(regan, wyatt)\nAngulate(wyatt, xymenes)\nAngulate(wyatt, regan)\nPreemptive(wyatt)\nChorionic(wyatt)\nProdromic(wyatt)\nLand(wyatt, xymenes)\nforall x (Remodel(x, wyatt) -> Land(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Daft(x) -> Land(x, xymenes))\nforall x (Daft(x) and Angulate(x, wyatt) -> Land(wyatt, regan))\nforall x (Remodel(x, regan) -> Remodel(x, wyatt))\nforall x (Prodromic(x) and Angulate(x, regan) -> Angulate(x, wyatt))\nforall x (Angulate(x, wyatt) and Prodromic(x) -> Daft(wyatt))\nforall x (Land(x, regan) and Land(regan, wyatt) -> Angulate(regan, zalman))\nforall x (Angulate(x, xymenes) and not Land(xymenes, wyatt) -> Fucking(wyatt))\n\nRemodel(wyatt, zalman)\n\nRemodel(wyatt, zalman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The lilith smatter the angy. The kathlin is not polymeric. The kathlin is pricey. The kathlin is not uncommon. The kathlin neighbor the gardener. The kathlin neighbor the angy. The gardener smatter the lilith. The gardener smatter the kathlin. The gardener is curable. The gardener quash the angy. The angy smatter the kathlin. The angy smatter the gardener. The angy is curable. The angy is unstated. The angy is pricey. The angy quash the kathlin. If something neighbor the angy then it quash the kathlin. If something is uncommon then it quash the kathlin. If something is uncommon and it smatter the angy then the angy quash the gardener. If something neighbor the gardener then it neighbor the angy. If something is pricey and it smatter the gardener then it smatter the angy. If something smatter the angy and it is pricey then the angy is uncommon. If something quash the gardener and the gardener quash the angy then the gardener smatter the lilith. If something smatter the kathlin and the kathlin does not see the angy then the angy is polymeric. The lilith does not need the kathlin.", "logic": "\nSmatter(lilith, angy)\nnot Polymeric(kathlin)\nPricey(kathlin)\nnot Uncommon(kathlin)\nNeighbor(kathlin, gardener)\nNeighbor(kathlin, angy)\nSmatter(gardener, lilith)\nSmatter(gardener, kathlin)\nCurable(gardener)\nQuash(gardener, angy)\nSmatter(angy, kathlin)\nSmatter(angy, gardener)\nCurable(angy)\nUnstated(angy)\nPricey(angy)\nQuash(angy, kathlin)\nforall x (Neighbor(x, angy) -> Quash(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) -> Quash(x, kathlin))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and Smatter(x, angy) -> Quash(angy, gardener))\nforall x (Neighbor(x, gardener) -> Neighbor(x, angy))\nforall x (Pricey(x) and Smatter(x, gardener) -> Smatter(x, angy))\nforall x (Smatter(x, angy) and Pricey(x) -> Uncommon(angy))\nforall x (Quash(x, gardener) and Quash(gardener, angy) -> Smatter(gardener, lilith))\nforall x (Smatter(x, kathlin) and not Quash(kathlin, angy) -> Polymeric(angy))\n\nnot Neighbor(lilith, kathlin)\n\nnot Neighbor(lilith, kathlin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The selma incite the deeanne. The gita is not coexisting. The gita is persisting. The gita is not glutted. The gita live the shamus. The gita live the deeanne. The shamus incite the selma. The shamus incite the gita. The shamus is myotonic. The shamus theologize the deeanne. The deeanne incite the gita. The deeanne incite the shamus. The deeanne is myotonic. The deeanne is donnean. The deeanne is persisting. The deeanne theologize the gita. If something live the deeanne then it theologize the gita. If something is glutted then it theologize the gita. If something is glutted and it incite the deeanne then the deeanne theologize the shamus. If something live the shamus then it live the deeanne. If something is persisting and it incite the shamus then it incite the deeanne. If something incite the deeanne and it is persisting then the deeanne is glutted. If something theologize the shamus and the shamus theologize the deeanne then the shamus incite the selma. If something incite the gita and the gita does not see the deeanne then the deeanne is coexisting. The selma is glutted.", "logic": "\nIncite(selma, deeanne)\nnot Coexisting(gita)\nPersisting(gita)\nnot Glutted(gita)\nLive(gita, shamus)\nLive(gita, deeanne)\nIncite(shamus, selma)\nIncite(shamus, gita)\nMyotonic(shamus)\nTheologize(shamus, deeanne)\nIncite(deeanne, gita)\nIncite(deeanne, shamus)\nMyotonic(deeanne)\nDonnean(deeanne)\nPersisting(deeanne)\nTheologize(deeanne, gita)\nforall x (Live(x, deeanne) -> Theologize(x, gita))\nforall x (Glutted(x) -> Theologize(x, gita))\nforall x (Glutted(x) and Incite(x, deeanne) -> Theologize(deeanne, shamus))\nforall x (Live(x, shamus) -> Live(x, deeanne))\nforall x (Persisting(x) and Incite(x, shamus) -> Incite(x, deeanne))\nforall x (Incite(x, deeanne) and Persisting(x) -> Glutted(deeanne))\nforall x (Theologize(x, shamus) and Theologize(shamus, deeanne) -> Incite(shamus, selma))\nforall x (Incite(x, gita) and not Theologize(gita, deeanne) -> Coexisting(deeanne))\n\nGlutted(selma)\n\nGlutted(selma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1141"} {"premises": "The sheff is candescent. If someone is candescent then they are subocean. Big, jetting people are subocean. All subocean people are primordial. If someone is dispersed and candescent then they are jetting. If the sheff is subocean and the sheff is primordial then the sheff is dispersed. If someone is subocean and candescent then they are primordial. The sheff is candescent.", "logic": "\nCandescent(sheff)\nforall x (Candescent(x) -> Subocean(x))\nforall x (Dispersed(x) and Jetting(x) -> Subocean(x))\nforall x (Subocean(x) -> Primordial(x))\nforall x (Dispersed(x) and Candescent(x) -> Jetting(x))\nSubocean(sheff) and Primordial(sheff) -> Dispersed(sheff)\nforall x (Subocean(x) and Candescent(x) -> Primordial(x))\n\nCandescent(sheff)\n\ntherefore Candescent(sheff)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The evonne is upstairs. If someone is upstairs then they are cyclical. Big, hispid people are cyclical. All cyclical people are phenomenal. If someone is victorious and upstairs then they are hispid. If the evonne is cyclical and the evonne is phenomenal then the evonne is victorious. If someone is cyclical and upstairs then they are phenomenal. The evonne is not upstairs.", "logic": "\nUpstairs(evonne)\nforall x (Upstairs(x) -> Cyclical(x))\nforall x (Victorious(x) and Hispid(x) -> Cyclical(x))\nforall x (Cyclical(x) -> Phenomenal(x))\nforall x (Victorious(x) and Upstairs(x) -> Hispid(x))\nCyclical(evonne) and Phenomenal(evonne) -> Victorious(evonne)\nforall x (Cyclical(x) and Upstairs(x) -> Phenomenal(x))\n\nnot Upstairs(evonne)\n\ntherefore Upstairs(evonne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The amalee is stenotic. If someone is stenotic then they are lilting. Big, chambered people are lilting. All lilting people are virtual. If someone is geological and stenotic then they are chambered. If the amalee is lilting and the amalee is virtual then the amalee is geological. If someone is lilting and stenotic then they are virtual. The amalee is lilting.", "logic": "\nStenotic(amalee)\nforall x (Stenotic(x) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) and Chambered(x) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Lilting(x) -> Virtual(x))\nforall x (Geological(x) and Stenotic(x) -> Chambered(x))\nLilting(amalee) and Virtual(amalee) -> Geological(amalee)\nforall x (Lilting(x) and Stenotic(x) -> Virtual(x))\n\nLilting(amalee)\n\nStenotic(amalee) and forall x (Stenotic(x) -> Lilting(x)) -> therefore Lilting(amalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The berkeley is solid. If someone is solid then they are enhancive. Big, goateed people are enhancive. All enhancive people are somali. If someone is functional and solid then they are goateed. If the berkeley is enhancive and the berkeley is somali then the berkeley is functional. If someone is enhancive and solid then they are somali. The berkeley is not enhancive.", "logic": "\nSolid(berkeley)\nforall x (Solid(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Functional(x) and Goateed(x) -> Enhancive(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Somali(x))\nforall x (Functional(x) and Solid(x) -> Goateed(x))\nEnhancive(berkeley) and Somali(berkeley) -> Functional(berkeley)\nforall x (Enhancive(x) and Solid(x) -> Somali(x))\n\nnot Enhancive(berkeley)\n\nSolid(berkeley) and forall x (Solid(x) -> Enhancive(x)) -> therefore Enhancive(berkeley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The ainslie is guileful. If someone is guileful then they are mediaeval. Big, dismaying people are mediaeval. All mediaeval people are troublous. If someone is pied and guileful then they are dismaying. If the ainslie is mediaeval and the ainslie is troublous then the ainslie is pied. If someone is mediaeval and guileful then they are troublous. The ainslie is troublous.", "logic": "\nGuileful(ainslie)\nforall x (Guileful(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\nforall x (Pied(x) and Dismaying(x) -> Mediaeval(x))\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Pied(x) and Guileful(x) -> Dismaying(x))\nMediaeval(ainslie) and Troublous(ainslie) -> Pied(ainslie)\nforall x (Mediaeval(x) and Guileful(x) -> Troublous(x))\n\nTroublous(ainslie)\n\nGuileful(ainslie) and forall x (Guileful(x) -> Mediaeval(x)) -> therefore Mediaeval(ainslie) Mediaeval(ainslie) and forall x (Mediaeval(x) -> Troublous(x)) -> therefore Troublous(ainslie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The koren is disclosed. If someone is disclosed then they are required. Big, fallacious people are required. All required people are nodding. If someone is shabby and disclosed then they are fallacious. If the koren is required and the koren is nodding then the koren is shabby. If someone is required and disclosed then they are nodding. The koren is not nodding.", "logic": "\nDisclosed(koren)\nforall x (Disclosed(x) -> Required(x))\nforall x (Shabby(x) and Fallacious(x) -> Required(x))\nforall x (Required(x) -> Nodding(x))\nforall x (Shabby(x) and Disclosed(x) -> Fallacious(x))\nRequired(koren) and Nodding(koren) -> Shabby(koren)\nforall x (Required(x) and Disclosed(x) -> Nodding(x))\n\nnot Nodding(koren)\n\nDisclosed(koren) and forall x (Disclosed(x) -> Required(x)) -> therefore Required(koren) Required(koren) and forall x (Required(x) -> Nodding(x)) -> therefore Nodding(koren)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The cathie is nectarous. If someone is nectarous then they are revengeful. Big, undramatic people are revengeful. All revengeful people are eolithic. If someone is hebridean and nectarous then they are undramatic. If the cathie is revengeful and the cathie is eolithic then the cathie is hebridean. If someone is revengeful and nectarous then they are eolithic. The cathie is hebridean.", "logic": "\nNectarous(cathie)\nforall x (Nectarous(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and Undramatic(x) -> Revengeful(x))\nforall x (Revengeful(x) -> Eolithic(x))\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and Nectarous(x) -> Undramatic(x))\nRevengeful(cathie) and Eolithic(cathie) -> Hebridean(cathie)\nforall x (Revengeful(x) and Nectarous(x) -> Eolithic(x))\n\nHebridean(cathie)\n\nNectarous(cathie) and forall x (Nectarous(x) -> Revengeful(x)) -> therefore Revengeful(cathie) Nectarous(cathie) and forall x (Nectarous(x) -> Revengeful(x)) -> therefore Revengeful(cathie) Revengeful(cathie) and forall x (Revengeful(x) -> Eolithic(x)) -> therefore Eolithic(cathie) Revengeful(cathie) and Eolithic(cathie) and Revengeful(cathie) and Eolithic(cathie) -> Hebridean(cathie) -> therefore Hebridean(cathie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The cathee is canadian. If someone is canadian then they are arduous. Big, unrested people are arduous. All arduous people are drugged. If someone is pedestrian and canadian then they are unrested. If the cathee is arduous and the cathee is drugged then the cathee is pedestrian. If someone is arduous and canadian then they are drugged. The cathee is not pedestrian.", "logic": "\nCanadian(cathee)\nforall x (Canadian(x) -> Arduous(x))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) and Unrested(x) -> Arduous(x))\nforall x (Arduous(x) -> Drugged(x))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) and Canadian(x) -> Unrested(x))\nArduous(cathee) and Drugged(cathee) -> Pedestrian(cathee)\nforall x (Arduous(x) and Canadian(x) -> Drugged(x))\n\nnot Pedestrian(cathee)\n\nCanadian(cathee) and forall x (Canadian(x) -> Arduous(x)) -> therefore Arduous(cathee) Canadian(cathee) and forall x (Canadian(x) -> Arduous(x)) -> therefore Arduous(cathee) Arduous(cathee) and forall x (Arduous(x) -> Drugged(x)) -> therefore Drugged(cathee) Arduous(cathee) and Drugged(cathee) and Arduous(cathee) and Drugged(cathee) -> Pedestrian(cathee) -> therefore Pedestrian(cathee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The lawrence is bedewed. If someone is bedewed then they are frank. Big, annexal people are frank. All frank people are matte. If someone is extant and bedewed then they are annexal. If the lawrence is frank and the lawrence is matte then the lawrence is extant. If someone is frank and bedewed then they are matte. The lawrence does not eat the lawrence.", "logic": "\nBedewed(lawrence)\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Frank(x))\nforall x (Extant(x) and Annexal(x) -> Frank(x))\nforall x (Frank(x) -> Matte(x))\nforall x (Extant(x) and Bedewed(x) -> Annexal(x))\nFrank(lawrence) and Matte(lawrence) -> Extant(lawrence)\nforall x (Frank(x) and Bedewed(x) -> Matte(x))\n\nnot Eats(lawrence, lawrence)\n\nnot Eats(lawrence, lawrence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "The gerianna is procedural. If someone is procedural then they are dickensian. Big, trihydroxy people are dickensian. All dickensian people are apsidal. If someone is glued and procedural then they are trihydroxy. If the gerianna is dickensian and the gerianna is apsidal then the gerianna is glued. If someone is dickensian and procedural then they are apsidal. The gerianna visits the gerianna.", "logic": "\nProcedural(gerianna)\nforall x (Procedural(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Glued(x) and Trihydroxy(x) -> Dickensian(x))\nforall x (Dickensian(x) -> Apsidal(x))\nforall x (Glued(x) and Procedural(x) -> Trihydroxy(x))\nDickensian(gerianna) and Apsidal(gerianna) -> Glued(gerianna)\nforall x (Dickensian(x) and Procedural(x) -> Apsidal(x))\n\nVisits(gerianna, gerianna)\n\nVisits(gerianna, gerianna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-484"} {"premises": "Merilee is trihydroxy. Ike is overloaded. Darth is overloaded. If Ike is overloaded and Ike is intensive then Ike is trihydroxy. All undesigned things are gloveless. If Darth is overloaded and Darth is holophytic then Darth is undesigned. Darth is overloaded.", "logic": "\nTrihydroxy(merilee)\nOverloaded(ike)\nOverloaded(darth)\nOverloaded(ike) and Intensive(ike) -> Trihydroxy(ike)\nforall x (Undesigned(x) -> Gloveless(x))\nOverloaded(darth) and Holophytic(darth) -> Undesigned(darth)\n\nOverloaded(darth)\n\ntherefore Overloaded(darth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5391"} {"premises": "Bobbi is sensory. Archie is chummy. Berte is chummy. If Archie is chummy and Archie is verifiable then Archie is sensory. All spotty things are wilful. If Berte is chummy and Berte is frosted then Berte is spotty. Bobbi is not sensory.", "logic": "\nSensory(bobbi)\nChummy(archie)\nChummy(berte)\nChummy(archie) and Verifiable(archie) -> Sensory(archie)\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Wilful(x))\nChummy(berte) and Frosted(berte) -> Spotty(berte)\n\nnot Sensory(bobbi)\n\ntherefore Sensory(bobbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5391"} {"premises": "Jay is ancient. Roth is humble. Prescott is humble. If Roth is humble and Roth is geared then Roth is ancient. All reeking things are hollow. If Prescott is humble and Prescott is latvian then Prescott is reeking. Prescott is not reeking.", "logic": "\nAncient(jay)\nHumble(roth)\nHumble(prescott)\nHumble(roth) and Geared(roth) -> Ancient(roth)\nforall x (Reeking(x) -> Hollow(x))\nHumble(prescott) and Latvian(prescott) -> Reeking(prescott)\n\nnot Reeking(prescott)\n\nHumble(prescott) and Latvian(prescott) -> Reeking(prescott) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5391"} {"premises": "Kristan is ethnologic. Florida is unsolvable. Fifi is unsolvable. If Florida is unsolvable and Florida is triune then Florida is ethnologic. All saturated things are elated. If Fifi is unsolvable and Fifi is nonviscid then Fifi is saturated. Fifi is nonviscid.", "logic": "\nEthnologic(kristan)\nUnsolvable(florida)\nUnsolvable(fifi)\nUnsolvable(florida) and Triune(florida) -> Ethnologic(florida)\nforall x (Saturated(x) -> Elated(x))\nUnsolvable(fifi) and Nonviscid(fifi) -> Saturated(fifi)\n\nNonviscid(fifi)\n\nNonviscid(fifi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5391"} {"premises": "The eleonore is backmost. The arthur is backmost. If someone is backmost then they eat the eleonore. If someone intend the eleonore then they do not eat the eleonore. If someone is backmost and they do not eat the arthur then they need the eleonore. If someone entertain the arthur and the arthur intend the eleonore then they do not need the arthur. If someone is waterworn then they do not chase the arthur. If the eleonore is backmost then the eleonore lance the arthur. If someone is analytic and they eat the eleonore then the eleonore does not chase the arthur. If someone lance the arthur then the arthur is waterworn. The eleonore is backmost.", "logic": "\nBackmost(eleonore)\nBackmost(arthur)\nforall x (Backmost(x) -> Entertain(x, eleonore))\nforall x (Intend(x, eleonore) -> not Entertain(x, eleonore))\nforall x (Backmost(x) and not Entertain(x, arthur) -> Lance(x, eleonore))\nforall x (Entertain(x, arthur) and Intend(arthur, eleonore) -> not Lance(x, arthur))\nforall x (Waterworn(x) -> not Intend(x, arthur))\nBackmost(eleonore) -> Lance(eleonore, arthur)\nforall x (Analytic(x) and Entertain(x, eleonore) -> not Intend(eleonore, arthur))\nforall x (Lance(x, arthur) -> Waterworn(arthur))\n\nBackmost(eleonore)\n\ntherefore Backmost(eleonore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The adara is boisterous. The willy is boisterous. If someone is boisterous then they eat the adara. If someone blub the adara then they do not eat the adara. If someone is boisterous and they do not eat the willy then they need the adara. If someone stalk the willy and the willy blub the adara then they do not need the willy. If someone is insolent then they do not chase the willy. If the adara is boisterous then the adara answer the willy. If someone is acneiform and they eat the adara then the adara does not chase the willy. If someone answer the willy then the willy is insolent. The adara is not boisterous.", "logic": "\nBoisterous(adara)\nBoisterous(willy)\nforall x (Boisterous(x) -> Stalk(x, adara))\nforall x (Blub(x, adara) -> not Stalk(x, adara))\nforall x (Boisterous(x) and not Stalk(x, willy) -> Answer(x, adara))\nforall x (Stalk(x, willy) and Blub(willy, adara) -> not Answer(x, willy))\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> not Blub(x, willy))\nBoisterous(adara) -> Answer(adara, willy)\nforall x (Acneiform(x) and Stalk(x, adara) -> not Blub(adara, willy))\nforall x (Answer(x, willy) -> Insolent(willy))\n\nnot Boisterous(adara)\n\ntherefore Boisterous(adara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The elianore is neolithic. The abagail is neolithic. If someone is neolithic then they eat the elianore. If someone promote the elianore then they do not eat the elianore. If someone is neolithic and they do not eat the abagail then they need the elianore. If someone maculate the abagail and the abagail promote the elianore then they do not need the abagail. If someone is ukrainian then they do not chase the abagail. If the elianore is neolithic then the elianore minstrel the abagail. If someone is wilful and they eat the elianore then the elianore does not chase the abagail. If someone minstrel the abagail then the abagail is ukrainian. The elianore maculate the elianore.", "logic": "\nNeolithic(elianore)\nNeolithic(abagail)\nforall x (Neolithic(x) -> Maculate(x, elianore))\nforall x (Promote(x, elianore) -> not Maculate(x, elianore))\nforall x (Neolithic(x) and not Maculate(x, abagail) -> Minstrel(x, elianore))\nforall x (Maculate(x, abagail) and Promote(abagail, elianore) -> not Minstrel(x, abagail))\nforall x (Ukrainian(x) -> not Promote(x, abagail))\nNeolithic(elianore) -> Minstrel(elianore, abagail)\nforall x (Wilful(x) and Maculate(x, elianore) -> not Promote(elianore, abagail))\nforall x (Minstrel(x, abagail) -> Ukrainian(abagail))\n\nMaculate(elianore, elianore)\n\nNeolithic(elianore) and forall x (Neolithic(x) -> Maculate(x, elianore)) -> therefore Maculate(elianore, elianore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The aila is formalized. The anett is formalized. If someone is formalized then they eat the aila. If someone pouch the aila then they do not eat the aila. If someone is formalized and they do not eat the anett then they need the aila. If someone hoodwink the anett and the anett pouch the aila then they do not need the anett. If someone is retentive then they do not chase the anett. If the aila is formalized then the aila overstock the anett. If someone is asunder and they eat the aila then the aila does not chase the anett. If someone overstock the anett then the anett is retentive. The aila does not need the anett.", "logic": "\nFormalized(aila)\nFormalized(anett)\nforall x (Formalized(x) -> Hoodwink(x, aila))\nforall x (Pouch(x, aila) -> not Hoodwink(x, aila))\nforall x (Formalized(x) and not Hoodwink(x, anett) -> Overstock(x, aila))\nforall x (Hoodwink(x, anett) and Pouch(anett, aila) -> not Overstock(x, anett))\nforall x (Retentive(x) -> not Pouch(x, anett))\nFormalized(aila) -> Overstock(aila, anett)\nforall x (Asunder(x) and Hoodwink(x, aila) -> not Pouch(aila, anett))\nforall x (Overstock(x, anett) -> Retentive(anett))\n\nnot Overstock(aila, anett)\n\nFormalized(aila) and Formalized(aila) -> Overstock(aila, anett) -> therefore Overstock(aila, anett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The ondrea is praising. The murphy is praising. If someone is praising then they eat the ondrea. If someone clang the ondrea then they do not eat the ondrea. If someone is praising and they do not eat the murphy then they need the ondrea. If someone schmooze the murphy and the murphy clang the ondrea then they do not need the murphy. If someone is condemning then they do not chase the murphy. If the ondrea is praising then the ondrea handstamp the murphy. If someone is swish and they eat the ondrea then the ondrea does not chase the murphy. If someone handstamp the murphy then the murphy is condemning. The murphy is condemning.", "logic": "\nPraising(ondrea)\nPraising(murphy)\nforall x (Praising(x) -> Schmooze(x, ondrea))\nforall x (Clang(x, ondrea) -> not Schmooze(x, ondrea))\nforall x (Praising(x) and not Schmooze(x, murphy) -> Handstamp(x, ondrea))\nforall x (Schmooze(x, murphy) and Clang(murphy, ondrea) -> not Handstamp(x, murphy))\nforall x (Condemning(x) -> not Clang(x, murphy))\nPraising(ondrea) -> Handstamp(ondrea, murphy)\nforall x (Swish(x) and Schmooze(x, ondrea) -> not Clang(ondrea, murphy))\nforall x (Handstamp(x, murphy) -> Condemning(murphy))\n\nCondemning(murphy)\n\nPraising(ondrea) and Praising(ondrea) -> Handstamp(ondrea, murphy) -> therefore Handstamp(ondrea, murphy) Handstamp(ondrea, murphy) and forall x (Handstamp(x, murphy) -> Condemning(murphy)) -> therefore Condemning(murphy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The dafna is caudate. The bertrand is caudate. If someone is caudate then they eat the dafna. If someone moisten the dafna then they do not eat the dafna. If someone is caudate and they do not eat the bertrand then they need the dafna. If someone monish the bertrand and the bertrand moisten the dafna then they do not need the bertrand. If someone is elaborated then they do not chase the bertrand. If the dafna is caudate then the dafna overpay the bertrand. If someone is oxidative and they eat the dafna then the dafna does not chase the bertrand. If someone overpay the bertrand then the bertrand is elaborated. The bertrand is not elaborated.", "logic": "\nCaudate(dafna)\nCaudate(bertrand)\nforall x (Caudate(x) -> Monish(x, dafna))\nforall x (Moisten(x, dafna) -> not Monish(x, dafna))\nforall x (Caudate(x) and not Monish(x, bertrand) -> Overpay(x, dafna))\nforall x (Monish(x, bertrand) and Moisten(bertrand, dafna) -> not Overpay(x, bertrand))\nforall x (Elaborated(x) -> not Moisten(x, bertrand))\nCaudate(dafna) -> Overpay(dafna, bertrand)\nforall x (Oxidative(x) and Monish(x, dafna) -> not Moisten(dafna, bertrand))\nforall x (Overpay(x, bertrand) -> Elaborated(bertrand))\n\nnot Elaborated(bertrand)\n\nCaudate(dafna) and Caudate(dafna) -> Overpay(dafna, bertrand) -> therefore Overpay(dafna, bertrand) Overpay(dafna, bertrand) and forall x (Overpay(x, bertrand) -> Elaborated(bertrand)) -> therefore Elaborated(bertrand)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The baird is permed. The shanan is permed. If someone is permed then they eat the baird. If someone scrag the baird then they do not eat the baird. If someone is permed and they do not eat the shanan then they need the baird. If someone inspirit the shanan and the shanan scrag the baird then they do not need the shanan. If someone is screwy then they do not chase the shanan. If the baird is permed then the baird randomize the shanan. If someone is axenic and they eat the baird then the baird does not chase the shanan. If someone randomize the shanan then the shanan is screwy. The shanan does not chase the shanan.", "logic": "\nPermed(baird)\nPermed(shanan)\nforall x (Permed(x) -> Inspirit(x, baird))\nforall x (Scrag(x, baird) -> not Inspirit(x, baird))\nforall x (Permed(x) and not Inspirit(x, shanan) -> Randomize(x, baird))\nforall x (Inspirit(x, shanan) and Scrag(shanan, baird) -> not Randomize(x, shanan))\nforall x (Screwy(x) -> not Scrag(x, shanan))\nPermed(baird) -> Randomize(baird, shanan)\nforall x (Axenic(x) and Inspirit(x, baird) -> not Scrag(baird, shanan))\nforall x (Randomize(x, shanan) -> Screwy(shanan))\n\nnot Scrag(shanan, shanan)\n\nPermed(baird) and Permed(baird) -> Randomize(baird, shanan) -> therefore Randomize(baird, shanan) Randomize(baird, shanan) and forall x (Randomize(x, shanan) -> Screwy(shanan)) -> therefore Screwy(shanan) Screwy(shanan) and forall x (Screwy(x) -> not Scrag(x, shanan)) -> therefore not Scrag(shanan, shanan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The cati is salt. The stanley is salt. If someone is salt then they eat the cati. If someone will the cati then they do not eat the cati. If someone is salt and they do not eat the stanley then they need the cati. If someone espy the stanley and the stanley will the cati then they do not need the stanley. If someone is braced then they do not chase the stanley. If the cati is salt then the cati credit the stanley. If someone is canescent and they eat the cati then the cati does not chase the stanley. If someone credit the stanley then the stanley is braced. The stanley will the stanley.", "logic": "\nSalt(cati)\nSalt(stanley)\nforall x (Salt(x) -> Espy(x, cati))\nforall x (Will(x, cati) -> not Espy(x, cati))\nforall x (Salt(x) and not Espy(x, stanley) -> Credit(x, cati))\nforall x (Espy(x, stanley) and Will(stanley, cati) -> not Credit(x, stanley))\nforall x (Braced(x) -> not Will(x, stanley))\nSalt(cati) -> Credit(cati, stanley)\nforall x (Canescent(x) and Espy(x, cati) -> not Will(cati, stanley))\nforall x (Credit(x, stanley) -> Braced(stanley))\n\nWill(stanley, stanley)\n\nSalt(cati) and Salt(cati) -> Credit(cati, stanley) -> therefore Credit(cati, stanley) Credit(cati, stanley) and forall x (Credit(x, stanley) -> Braced(stanley)) -> therefore Braced(stanley) Braced(stanley) and forall x (Braced(x) -> not Will(x, stanley)) -> therefore not Will(stanley, stanley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The antonin is insentient. The edna is insentient. If someone is insentient then they eat the antonin. If someone advise the antonin then they do not eat the antonin. If someone is insentient and they do not eat the edna then they need the antonin. If someone kidnap the edna and the edna advise the antonin then they do not need the edna. If someone is certain then they do not chase the edna. If the antonin is insentient then the antonin overcloud the edna. If someone is affirmable and they eat the antonin then the antonin does not chase the edna. If someone overcloud the edna then the edna is certain. The edna does not need the antonin.", "logic": "\nInsentient(antonin)\nInsentient(edna)\nforall x (Insentient(x) -> Kidnap(x, antonin))\nforall x (Advise(x, antonin) -> not Kidnap(x, antonin))\nforall x (Insentient(x) and not Kidnap(x, edna) -> Overcloud(x, antonin))\nforall x (Kidnap(x, edna) and Advise(edna, antonin) -> not Overcloud(x, edna))\nforall x (Certain(x) -> not Advise(x, edna))\nInsentient(antonin) -> Overcloud(antonin, edna)\nforall x (Affirmable(x) and Kidnap(x, antonin) -> not Advise(antonin, edna))\nforall x (Overcloud(x, edna) -> Certain(edna))\n\nnot Overcloud(edna, antonin)\n\nforall x (Insentient(x) and not Kidnap(x, edna) -> Overcloud(x, antonin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The ezechiel is glary. The bess is glary. If someone is glary then they eat the ezechiel. If someone literalise the ezechiel then they do not eat the ezechiel. If someone is glary and they do not eat the bess then they need the ezechiel. If someone offset the bess and the bess literalise the ezechiel then they do not need the bess. If someone is thirsty then they do not chase the bess. If the ezechiel is glary then the ezechiel raffle the bess. If someone is trifid and they eat the ezechiel then the ezechiel does not chase the bess. If someone raffle the bess then the bess is thirsty. The ezechiel raffle the ezechiel.", "logic": "\nGlary(ezechiel)\nGlary(bess)\nforall x (Glary(x) -> Offset(x, ezechiel))\nforall x (Literalise(x, ezechiel) -> not Offset(x, ezechiel))\nforall x (Glary(x) and not Offset(x, bess) -> Raffle(x, ezechiel))\nforall x (Offset(x, bess) and Literalise(bess, ezechiel) -> not Raffle(x, bess))\nforall x (Thirsty(x) -> not Literalise(x, bess))\nGlary(ezechiel) -> Raffle(ezechiel, bess)\nforall x (Trifid(x) and Offset(x, ezechiel) -> not Literalise(ezechiel, bess))\nforall x (Raffle(x, bess) -> Thirsty(bess))\n\nRaffle(ezechiel, ezechiel)\n\nforall x (Glary(x) and not Offset(x, bess) -> Raffle(x, ezechiel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The judas is nascent. The eirena is nascent. If someone is nascent then they eat the judas. If someone sniff the judas then they do not eat the judas. If someone is nascent and they do not eat the eirena then they need the judas. If someone stalk the eirena and the eirena sniff the judas then they do not need the eirena. If someone is isosceles then they do not chase the eirena. If the judas is nascent then the judas dispirit the eirena. If someone is provencal and they eat the judas then the judas does not chase the eirena. If someone dispirit the eirena then the eirena is isosceles. The eirena is not provencal.", "logic": "\nNascent(judas)\nNascent(eirena)\nforall x (Nascent(x) -> Stalk(x, judas))\nforall x (Sniff(x, judas) -> not Stalk(x, judas))\nforall x (Nascent(x) and not Stalk(x, eirena) -> Dispirit(x, judas))\nforall x (Stalk(x, eirena) and Sniff(eirena, judas) -> not Dispirit(x, eirena))\nforall x (Isosceles(x) -> not Sniff(x, eirena))\nNascent(judas) -> Dispirit(judas, eirena)\nforall x (Provencal(x) and Stalk(x, judas) -> not Sniff(judas, eirena))\nforall x (Dispirit(x, eirena) -> Isosceles(eirena))\n\nnot Provencal(eirena)\n\nnot Provencal(eirena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The bella is resurgent. The mikey is resurgent. If someone is resurgent then they eat the bella. If someone resell the bella then they do not eat the bella. If someone is resurgent and they do not eat the mikey then they need the bella. If someone idolize the mikey and the mikey resell the bella then they do not need the mikey. If someone is physical then they do not chase the mikey. If the bella is resurgent then the bella mark the mikey. If someone is azimuthal and they eat the bella then the bella does not chase the mikey. If someone mark the mikey then the mikey is physical. The bella is round.", "logic": "\nResurgent(bella)\nResurgent(mikey)\nforall x (Resurgent(x) -> Idolize(x, bella))\nforall x (Resell(x, bella) -> not Idolize(x, bella))\nforall x (Resurgent(x) and not Idolize(x, mikey) -> Mark(x, bella))\nforall x (Idolize(x, mikey) and Resell(mikey, bella) -> not Mark(x, mikey))\nforall x (Physical(x) -> not Resell(x, mikey))\nResurgent(bella) -> Mark(bella, mikey)\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and Idolize(x, bella) -> not Resell(bella, mikey))\nforall x (Mark(x, mikey) -> Physical(mikey))\n\nRound(bella)\n\nRound(bella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The orella is transfixed. The martina is transfixed. If someone is transfixed then they eat the orella. If someone addle the orella then they do not eat the orella. If someone is transfixed and they do not eat the martina then they need the orella. If someone license the martina and the martina addle the orella then they do not need the martina. If someone is capsulated then they do not chase the martina. If the orella is transfixed then the orella benficiate the martina. If someone is scrawny and they eat the orella then the orella does not chase the martina. If someone benficiate the martina then the martina is capsulated. The martina is not round.", "logic": "\nTransfixed(orella)\nTransfixed(martina)\nforall x (Transfixed(x) -> License(x, orella))\nforall x (Addle(x, orella) -> not License(x, orella))\nforall x (Transfixed(x) and not License(x, martina) -> Benficiate(x, orella))\nforall x (License(x, martina) and Addle(martina, orella) -> not Benficiate(x, martina))\nforall x (Capsulated(x) -> not Addle(x, martina))\nTransfixed(orella) -> Benficiate(orella, martina)\nforall x (Scrawny(x) and License(x, orella) -> not Addle(orella, martina))\nforall x (Benficiate(x, martina) -> Capsulated(martina))\n\nnot Round(martina)\n\nnot Round(martina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The micky is binucleate. The steffane is binucleate. If someone is binucleate then they eat the micky. If someone pore the micky then they do not eat the micky. If someone is binucleate and they do not eat the steffane then they need the micky. If someone cash the steffane and the steffane pore the micky then they do not need the steffane. If someone is capacitive then they do not chase the steffane. If the micky is binucleate then the micky gluttonise the steffane. If someone is mawkish and they eat the micky then the micky does not chase the steffane. If someone gluttonise the steffane then the steffane is capacitive. The micky is capacitive.", "logic": "\nBinucleate(micky)\nBinucleate(steffane)\nforall x (Binucleate(x) -> Cash(x, micky))\nforall x (Pore(x, micky) -> not Cash(x, micky))\nforall x (Binucleate(x) and not Cash(x, steffane) -> Gluttonise(x, micky))\nforall x (Cash(x, steffane) and Pore(steffane, micky) -> not Gluttonise(x, steffane))\nforall x (Capacitive(x) -> not Pore(x, steffane))\nBinucleate(micky) -> Gluttonise(micky, steffane)\nforall x (Mawkish(x) and Cash(x, micky) -> not Pore(micky, steffane))\nforall x (Gluttonise(x, steffane) -> Capacitive(steffane))\n\nCapacitive(micky)\n\nCapacitive(micky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The vin is afflicted. The mella is afflicted. If someone is afflicted then they eat the vin. If someone apparel the vin then they do not eat the vin. If someone is afflicted and they do not eat the mella then they need the vin. If someone distribute the mella and the mella apparel the vin then they do not need the mella. If someone is uncommon then they do not chase the mella. If the vin is afflicted then the vin degas the mella. If someone is boorish and they eat the vin then the vin does not chase the mella. If someone degas the mella then the mella is uncommon. The vin does not chase the mella.", "logic": "\nAfflicted(vin)\nAfflicted(mella)\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Distribute(x, vin))\nforall x (Apparel(x, vin) -> not Distribute(x, vin))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) and not Distribute(x, mella) -> Degas(x, vin))\nforall x (Distribute(x, mella) and Apparel(mella, vin) -> not Degas(x, mella))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) -> not Apparel(x, mella))\nAfflicted(vin) -> Degas(vin, mella)\nforall x (Boorish(x) and Distribute(x, vin) -> not Apparel(vin, mella))\nforall x (Degas(x, mella) -> Uncommon(mella))\n\nnot Apparel(vin, mella)\n\nnot Apparel(vin, mella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The lydia is venerating. The chaim is venerating. If someone is venerating then they eat the lydia. If someone jerk the lydia then they do not eat the lydia. If someone is venerating and they do not eat the chaim then they need the lydia. If someone muck the chaim and the chaim jerk the lydia then they do not need the chaim. If someone is complacent then they do not chase the chaim. If the lydia is venerating then the lydia seek the chaim. If someone is derogatory and they eat the lydia then the lydia does not chase the chaim. If someone seek the chaim then the chaim is complacent. The chaim jerk the lydia.", "logic": "\nVenerating(lydia)\nVenerating(chaim)\nforall x (Venerating(x) -> Muck(x, lydia))\nforall x (Jerk(x, lydia) -> not Muck(x, lydia))\nforall x (Venerating(x) and not Muck(x, chaim) -> Seek(x, lydia))\nforall x (Muck(x, chaim) and Jerk(chaim, lydia) -> not Seek(x, chaim))\nforall x (Complacent(x) -> not Jerk(x, chaim))\nVenerating(lydia) -> Seek(lydia, chaim)\nforall x (Derogatory(x) and Muck(x, lydia) -> not Jerk(lydia, chaim))\nforall x (Seek(x, chaim) -> Complacent(chaim))\n\nJerk(chaim, lydia)\n\nJerk(chaim, lydia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1096"} {"premises": "The adger is preceding. The adger vitiate the praneetf. The adger rifle the sparky. The zachariah vitiate the adger. The zachariah molder the adger. The zachariah molder the praneetf. The praneetf vitiate the adger. The praneetf molder the sparky. The praneetf rifle the adger. The sparky is demure. The sparky vitiate the praneetf. The sparky rifle the adger. All preceding things are muzzy. If something molder the praneetf then it is preceding. If something vitiate the sparky then the sparky is barbellate. If something rifle the sparky then it is muzzy. If something molder the adger and it molder the sparky then it rifle the praneetf. If something is muzzy then it vitiate the zachariah. The zachariah vitiate the adger.", "logic": "\nPreceding(adger)\nVitiate(adger, praneetf)\nRifle(adger, sparky)\nVitiate(zachariah, adger)\nMolder(zachariah, adger)\nMolder(zachariah, praneetf)\nVitiate(praneetf, adger)\nMolder(praneetf, sparky)\nRifle(praneetf, adger)\nDemure(sparky)\nVitiate(sparky, praneetf)\nRifle(sparky, adger)\nforall x (Preceding(x) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Molder(x, praneetf) -> Preceding(x))\nforall x (Vitiate(x, sparky) -> Barbellate(sparky))\nforall x (Rifle(x, sparky) -> Muzzy(x))\nforall x (Molder(x, adger) and Molder(x, sparky) -> Rifle(x, praneetf))\nforall x (Muzzy(x) -> Vitiate(x, zachariah))\n\nVitiate(zachariah, adger)\n\ntherefore Vitiate(zachariah, adger)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The roseanne is unremedied. The roseanne disable the melloney. The roseanne sharpen the glorianna. The lambert disable the roseanne. The lambert cicatrize the roseanne. The lambert cicatrize the melloney. The melloney disable the roseanne. The melloney cicatrize the glorianna. The melloney sharpen the roseanne. The glorianna is cannular. The glorianna disable the melloney. The glorianna sharpen the roseanne. All unremedied things are commensal. If something cicatrize the melloney then it is unremedied. If something disable the glorianna then the glorianna is anionic. If something sharpen the glorianna then it is commensal. If something cicatrize the roseanne and it cicatrize the glorianna then it sharpen the melloney. If something is commensal then it disable the lambert. The glorianna does not like the melloney.", "logic": "\nUnremedied(roseanne)\nDisable(roseanne, melloney)\nSharpen(roseanne, glorianna)\nDisable(lambert, roseanne)\nCicatrize(lambert, roseanne)\nCicatrize(lambert, melloney)\nDisable(melloney, roseanne)\nCicatrize(melloney, glorianna)\nSharpen(melloney, roseanne)\nCannular(glorianna)\nDisable(glorianna, melloney)\nSharpen(glorianna, roseanne)\nforall x (Unremedied(x) -> Commensal(x))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, melloney) -> Unremedied(x))\nforall x (Disable(x, glorianna) -> Anionic(glorianna))\nforall x (Sharpen(x, glorianna) -> Commensal(x))\nforall x (Cicatrize(x, roseanne) and Cicatrize(x, glorianna) -> Sharpen(x, melloney))\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Disable(x, lambert))\n\nnot Disable(glorianna, melloney)\n\ntherefore Disable(glorianna, melloney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The rustie is vendable. The rustie combat the colleen. The rustie clot the maxine. The brice combat the rustie. The brice memorize the rustie. The brice memorize the colleen. The colleen combat the rustie. The colleen memorize the maxine. The colleen clot the rustie. The maxine is uncouth. The maxine combat the colleen. The maxine clot the rustie. All vendable things are carnation. If something memorize the colleen then it is vendable. If something combat the maxine then the maxine is especial. If something clot the maxine then it is carnation. If something memorize the rustie and it memorize the maxine then it clot the colleen. If something is carnation then it combat the brice. The brice is vendable.", "logic": "\nVendable(rustie)\nCombat(rustie, colleen)\nClot(rustie, maxine)\nCombat(brice, rustie)\nMemorize(brice, rustie)\nMemorize(brice, colleen)\nCombat(colleen, rustie)\nMemorize(colleen, maxine)\nClot(colleen, rustie)\nUncouth(maxine)\nCombat(maxine, colleen)\nClot(maxine, rustie)\nforall x (Vendable(x) -> Carnation(x))\nforall x (Memorize(x, colleen) -> Vendable(x))\nforall x (Combat(x, maxine) -> Especial(maxine))\nforall x (Clot(x, maxine) -> Carnation(x))\nforall x (Memorize(x, rustie) and Memorize(x, maxine) -> Clot(x, colleen))\nforall x (Carnation(x) -> Combat(x, brice))\n\nVendable(brice)\n\nMemorize(brice, colleen) and forall x (Memorize(x, colleen) -> Vendable(x)) -> therefore Vendable(brice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The fortuna is dished. The fortuna meddle the marwin. The fortuna whelm the kendrick. The ethelind meddle the fortuna. The ethelind scorn the fortuna. The ethelind scorn the marwin. The marwin meddle the fortuna. The marwin scorn the kendrick. The marwin whelm the fortuna. The kendrick is synoecious. The kendrick meddle the marwin. The kendrick whelm the fortuna. All dished things are benthal. If something scorn the marwin then it is dished. If something meddle the kendrick then the kendrick is grey. If something whelm the kendrick then it is benthal. If something scorn the fortuna and it scorn the kendrick then it whelm the marwin. If something is benthal then it meddle the ethelind. The ethelind is not dished.", "logic": "\nDished(fortuna)\nMeddle(fortuna, marwin)\nWhelm(fortuna, kendrick)\nMeddle(ethelind, fortuna)\nScorn(ethelind, fortuna)\nScorn(ethelind, marwin)\nMeddle(marwin, fortuna)\nScorn(marwin, kendrick)\nWhelm(marwin, fortuna)\nSynoecious(kendrick)\nMeddle(kendrick, marwin)\nWhelm(kendrick, fortuna)\nforall x (Dished(x) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Scorn(x, marwin) -> Dished(x))\nforall x (Meddle(x, kendrick) -> Grey(kendrick))\nforall x (Whelm(x, kendrick) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Scorn(x, fortuna) and Scorn(x, kendrick) -> Whelm(x, marwin))\nforall x (Benthal(x) -> Meddle(x, ethelind))\n\nnot Dished(ethelind)\n\nScorn(ethelind, marwin) and forall x (Scorn(x, marwin) -> Dished(x)) -> therefore Dished(ethelind)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The erik is memberless. The erik tear the nathanael. The erik determine the hadrian. The dianna tear the erik. The dianna cane the erik. The dianna cane the nathanael. The nathanael tear the erik. The nathanael cane the hadrian. The nathanael determine the erik. The hadrian is tricksy. The hadrian tear the nathanael. The hadrian determine the erik. All memberless things are celluloid. If something cane the nathanael then it is memberless. If something tear the hadrian then the hadrian is sensed. If something determine the hadrian then it is celluloid. If something cane the erik and it cane the hadrian then it determine the nathanael. If something is celluloid then it tear the dianna. The erik tear the dianna.", "logic": "\nMemberless(erik)\nTear(erik, nathanael)\nDetermine(erik, hadrian)\nTear(dianna, erik)\nCane(dianna, erik)\nCane(dianna, nathanael)\nTear(nathanael, erik)\nCane(nathanael, hadrian)\nDetermine(nathanael, erik)\nTricksy(hadrian)\nTear(hadrian, nathanael)\nDetermine(hadrian, erik)\nforall x (Memberless(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Cane(x, nathanael) -> Memberless(x))\nforall x (Tear(x, hadrian) -> Sensed(hadrian))\nforall x (Determine(x, hadrian) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Cane(x, erik) and Cane(x, hadrian) -> Determine(x, nathanael))\nforall x (Celluloid(x) -> Tear(x, dianna))\n\nTear(erik, dianna)\n\nMemberless(erik) and forall x (Memberless(x) -> Celluloid(x)) -> therefore Celluloid(erik) Celluloid(erik) and forall x (Celluloid(x) -> Tear(x, dianna)) -> therefore Tear(erik, dianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The reza is chemic. The reza slow the malena. The reza foster the zara. The lorilee slow the reza. The lorilee exempt the reza. The lorilee exempt the malena. The malena slow the reza. The malena exempt the zara. The malena foster the reza. The zara is ceremonial. The zara slow the malena. The zara foster the reza. All chemic things are generative. If something exempt the malena then it is chemic. If something slow the zara then the zara is tight. If something foster the zara then it is generative. If something exempt the reza and it exempt the zara then it foster the malena. If something is generative then it slow the lorilee. The lorilee is not generative.", "logic": "\nChemic(reza)\nSlow(reza, malena)\nFoster(reza, zara)\nSlow(lorilee, reza)\nExempt(lorilee, reza)\nExempt(lorilee, malena)\nSlow(malena, reza)\nExempt(malena, zara)\nFoster(malena, reza)\nCeremonial(zara)\nSlow(zara, malena)\nFoster(zara, reza)\nforall x (Chemic(x) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Exempt(x, malena) -> Chemic(x))\nforall x (Slow(x, zara) -> Tight(zara))\nforall x (Foster(x, zara) -> Generative(x))\nforall x (Exempt(x, reza) and Exempt(x, zara) -> Foster(x, malena))\nforall x (Generative(x) -> Slow(x, lorilee))\n\nnot Generative(lorilee)\n\nExempt(lorilee, malena) and forall x (Exempt(x, malena) -> Chemic(x)) -> therefore Chemic(lorilee) Chemic(lorilee) and forall x (Chemic(x) -> Generative(x)) -> therefore Generative(lorilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The marielle is fluky. The marielle ornament the muffin. The marielle mulch the moira. The adolf ornament the marielle. The adolf amend the marielle. The adolf amend the muffin. The muffin ornament the marielle. The muffin amend the moira. The muffin mulch the marielle. The moira is moonstruck. The moira ornament the muffin. The moira mulch the marielle. All fluky things are mediated. If something amend the muffin then it is fluky. If something ornament the moira then the moira is sisterly. If something mulch the moira then it is mediated. If something amend the marielle and it amend the moira then it mulch the muffin. If something is mediated then it ornament the adolf. The adolf ornament the adolf.", "logic": "\nFluky(marielle)\nOrnament(marielle, muffin)\nMulch(marielle, moira)\nOrnament(adolf, marielle)\nAmend(adolf, marielle)\nAmend(adolf, muffin)\nOrnament(muffin, marielle)\nAmend(muffin, moira)\nMulch(muffin, marielle)\nMoonstruck(moira)\nOrnament(moira, muffin)\nMulch(moira, marielle)\nforall x (Fluky(x) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Amend(x, muffin) -> Fluky(x))\nforall x (Ornament(x, moira) -> Sisterly(moira))\nforall x (Mulch(x, moira) -> Mediated(x))\nforall x (Amend(x, marielle) and Amend(x, moira) -> Mulch(x, muffin))\nforall x (Mediated(x) -> Ornament(x, adolf))\n\nOrnament(adolf, adolf)\n\nAmend(adolf, muffin) and forall x (Amend(x, muffin) -> Fluky(x)) -> therefore Fluky(adolf) Fluky(adolf) and forall x (Fluky(x) -> Mediated(x)) -> therefore Mediated(adolf) Mediated(adolf) and forall x (Mediated(x) -> Ornament(x, adolf)) -> therefore Ornament(adolf, adolf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The ora is iambic. The ora impede the kristine. The ora dull the magnus. The sisile impede the ora. The sisile resuspend the ora. The sisile resuspend the kristine. The kristine impede the ora. The kristine resuspend the magnus. The kristine dull the ora. The magnus is leftish. The magnus impede the kristine. The magnus dull the ora. All iambic things are unethical. If something resuspend the kristine then it is iambic. If something impede the magnus then the magnus is provoked. If something dull the magnus then it is unethical. If something resuspend the ora and it resuspend the magnus then it dull the kristine. If something is unethical then it impede the sisile. The sisile does not like the sisile.", "logic": "\nIambic(ora)\nImpede(ora, kristine)\nDull(ora, magnus)\nImpede(sisile, ora)\nResuspend(sisile, ora)\nResuspend(sisile, kristine)\nImpede(kristine, ora)\nResuspend(kristine, magnus)\nDull(kristine, ora)\nLeftish(magnus)\nImpede(magnus, kristine)\nDull(magnus, ora)\nforall x (Iambic(x) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, kristine) -> Iambic(x))\nforall x (Impede(x, magnus) -> Provoked(magnus))\nforall x (Dull(x, magnus) -> Unethical(x))\nforall x (Resuspend(x, ora) and Resuspend(x, magnus) -> Dull(x, kristine))\nforall x (Unethical(x) -> Impede(x, sisile))\n\nnot Impede(sisile, sisile)\n\nResuspend(sisile, kristine) and forall x (Resuspend(x, kristine) -> Iambic(x)) -> therefore Iambic(sisile) Iambic(sisile) and forall x (Iambic(x) -> Unethical(x)) -> therefore Unethical(sisile) Unethical(sisile) and forall x (Unethical(x) -> Impede(x, sisile)) -> therefore Impede(sisile, sisile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The ehud is wasteful. The ehud canalise the claudius. The ehud fricassee the giles. The gisele canalise the ehud. The gisele rule the ehud. The gisele rule the claudius. The claudius canalise the ehud. The claudius rule the giles. The claudius fricassee the ehud. The giles is star. The giles canalise the claudius. The giles fricassee the ehud. All wasteful things are euphonous. If something rule the claudius then it is wasteful. If something canalise the giles then the giles is rabbinical. If something fricassee the giles then it is euphonous. If something rule the ehud and it rule the giles then it fricassee the claudius. If something is euphonous then it canalise the gisele. The claudius is not wasteful.", "logic": "\nWasteful(ehud)\nCanalise(ehud, claudius)\nFricassee(ehud, giles)\nCanalise(gisele, ehud)\nRule(gisele, ehud)\nRule(gisele, claudius)\nCanalise(claudius, ehud)\nRule(claudius, giles)\nFricassee(claudius, ehud)\nStar(giles)\nCanalise(giles, claudius)\nFricassee(giles, ehud)\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Rule(x, claudius) -> Wasteful(x))\nforall x (Canalise(x, giles) -> Rabbinical(giles))\nforall x (Fricassee(x, giles) -> Euphonous(x))\nforall x (Rule(x, ehud) and Rule(x, giles) -> Fricassee(x, claudius))\nforall x (Euphonous(x) -> Canalise(x, gisele))\n\nnot Wasteful(claudius)\n\nforall x (Rule(x, claudius) -> Wasteful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The orel is diluvial. The orel glaze the teri. The orel sport the eddy. The gamaliel glaze the orel. The gamaliel undertake the orel. The gamaliel undertake the teri. The teri glaze the orel. The teri undertake the eddy. The teri sport the orel. The eddy is corporal. The eddy glaze the teri. The eddy sport the orel. All diluvial things are bilocular. If something undertake the teri then it is diluvial. If something glaze the eddy then the eddy is unfunny. If something sport the eddy then it is bilocular. If something undertake the orel and it undertake the eddy then it sport the teri. If something is bilocular then it glaze the gamaliel. The eddy sport the teri.", "logic": "\nDiluvial(orel)\nGlaze(orel, teri)\nSport(orel, eddy)\nGlaze(gamaliel, orel)\nUndertake(gamaliel, orel)\nUndertake(gamaliel, teri)\nGlaze(teri, orel)\nUndertake(teri, eddy)\nSport(teri, orel)\nCorporal(eddy)\nGlaze(eddy, teri)\nSport(eddy, orel)\nforall x (Diluvial(x) -> Bilocular(x))\nforall x (Undertake(x, teri) -> Diluvial(x))\nforall x (Glaze(x, eddy) -> Unfunny(eddy))\nforall x (Sport(x, eddy) -> Bilocular(x))\nforall x (Undertake(x, orel) and Undertake(x, eddy) -> Sport(x, teri))\nforall x (Bilocular(x) -> Glaze(x, gamaliel))\n\nSport(eddy, teri)\n\nforall x (Undertake(x, orel) and Undertake(x, eddy) -> Sport(x, teri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The leoine is pavlovian. The leoine outcrop the rica. The leoine poetize the kylie. The patricio outcrop the leoine. The patricio officiate the leoine. The patricio officiate the rica. The rica outcrop the leoine. The rica officiate the kylie. The rica poetize the leoine. The kylie is collusive. The kylie outcrop the rica. The kylie poetize the leoine. All pavlovian things are semisolid. If something officiate the rica then it is pavlovian. If something outcrop the kylie then the kylie is turkish. If something poetize the kylie then it is semisolid. If something officiate the leoine and it officiate the kylie then it poetize the rica. If something is semisolid then it outcrop the patricio. The rica does not visit the rica.", "logic": "\nPavlovian(leoine)\nOutcrop(leoine, rica)\nPoetize(leoine, kylie)\nOutcrop(patricio, leoine)\nOfficiate(patricio, leoine)\nOfficiate(patricio, rica)\nOutcrop(rica, leoine)\nOfficiate(rica, kylie)\nPoetize(rica, leoine)\nCollusive(kylie)\nOutcrop(kylie, rica)\nPoetize(kylie, leoine)\nforall x (Pavlovian(x) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Officiate(x, rica) -> Pavlovian(x))\nforall x (Outcrop(x, kylie) -> Turkish(kylie))\nforall x (Poetize(x, kylie) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Officiate(x, leoine) and Officiate(x, kylie) -> Poetize(x, rica))\nforall x (Semisolid(x) -> Outcrop(x, patricio))\n\nnot Poetize(rica, rica)\n\nforall x (Officiate(x, leoine) and Officiate(x, kylie) -> Poetize(x, rica)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The ross is opened. The ross season the dede. The ross chagrin the hertha. The lind season the ross. The lind stet the ross. The lind stet the dede. The dede season the ross. The dede stet the hertha. The dede chagrin the ross. The hertha is ashen. The hertha season the dede. The hertha chagrin the ross. All opened things are mutable. If something stet the dede then it is opened. If something season the hertha then the hertha is wifelike. If something chagrin the hertha then it is mutable. If something stet the ross and it stet the hertha then it chagrin the dede. If something is mutable then it season the lind. The hertha is opened.", "logic": "\nOpened(ross)\nSeason(ross, dede)\nChagrin(ross, hertha)\nSeason(lind, ross)\nStet(lind, ross)\nStet(lind, dede)\nSeason(dede, ross)\nStet(dede, hertha)\nChagrin(dede, ross)\nAshen(hertha)\nSeason(hertha, dede)\nChagrin(hertha, ross)\nforall x (Opened(x) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Stet(x, dede) -> Opened(x))\nforall x (Season(x, hertha) -> Wifelike(hertha))\nforall x (Chagrin(x, hertha) -> Mutable(x))\nforall x (Stet(x, ross) and Stet(x, hertha) -> Chagrin(x, dede))\nforall x (Mutable(x) -> Season(x, lind))\n\nOpened(hertha)\n\nforall x (Stet(x, dede) -> Opened(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The bobine is english. The bobine preordain the ilene. The bobine deflect the dimitris. The netti preordain the bobine. The netti numb the bobine. The netti numb the ilene. The ilene preordain the bobine. The ilene numb the dimitris. The ilene deflect the bobine. The dimitris is clitoral. The dimitris preordain the ilene. The dimitris deflect the bobine. All english things are honorable. If something numb the ilene then it is english. If something preordain the dimitris then the dimitris is burdened. If something deflect the dimitris then it is honorable. If something numb the bobine and it numb the dimitris then it deflect the ilene. If something is honorable then it preordain the netti. The bobine does not see the bobine.", "logic": "\nEnglish(bobine)\nPreordain(bobine, ilene)\nDeflect(bobine, dimitris)\nPreordain(netti, bobine)\nNumb(netti, bobine)\nNumb(netti, ilene)\nPreordain(ilene, bobine)\nNumb(ilene, dimitris)\nDeflect(ilene, bobine)\nClitoral(dimitris)\nPreordain(dimitris, ilene)\nDeflect(dimitris, bobine)\nforall x (English(x) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Numb(x, ilene) -> English(x))\nforall x (Preordain(x, dimitris) -> Burdened(dimitris))\nforall x (Deflect(x, dimitris) -> Honorable(x))\nforall x (Numb(x, bobine) and Numb(x, dimitris) -> Deflect(x, ilene))\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Preordain(x, netti))\n\nnot Numb(bobine, bobine)\n\nnot Numb(bobine, bobine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The gunner is running. The gunner buccaneer the sandro. The gunner lisp the ashby. The elise buccaneer the gunner. The elise nett the gunner. The elise nett the sandro. The sandro buccaneer the gunner. The sandro nett the ashby. The sandro lisp the gunner. The ashby is cornish. The ashby buccaneer the sandro. The ashby lisp the gunner. All running things are unshaved. If something nett the sandro then it is running. If something buccaneer the ashby then the ashby is botulinal. If something lisp the ashby then it is unshaved. If something nett the gunner and it nett the ashby then it lisp the sandro. If something is unshaved then it buccaneer the elise. The ashby nett the elise.", "logic": "\nRunning(gunner)\nBuccaneer(gunner, sandro)\nLisp(gunner, ashby)\nBuccaneer(elise, gunner)\nNett(elise, gunner)\nNett(elise, sandro)\nBuccaneer(sandro, gunner)\nNett(sandro, ashby)\nLisp(sandro, gunner)\nCornish(ashby)\nBuccaneer(ashby, sandro)\nLisp(ashby, gunner)\nforall x (Running(x) -> Unshaved(x))\nforall x (Nett(x, sandro) -> Running(x))\nforall x (Buccaneer(x, ashby) -> Botulinal(ashby))\nforall x (Lisp(x, ashby) -> Unshaved(x))\nforall x (Nett(x, gunner) and Nett(x, ashby) -> Lisp(x, sandro))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) -> Buccaneer(x, elise))\n\nNett(ashby, elise)\n\nNett(ashby, elise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The chiarra is chimerical. The chiarra complicate the alleen. The chiarra snicker the kevan. The schuyler complicate the chiarra. The schuyler ruckle the chiarra. The schuyler ruckle the alleen. The alleen complicate the chiarra. The alleen ruckle the kevan. The alleen snicker the chiarra. The kevan is caducous. The kevan complicate the alleen. The kevan snicker the chiarra. All chimerical things are nosohusial. If something ruckle the alleen then it is chimerical. If something complicate the kevan then the kevan is shoed. If something snicker the kevan then it is nosohusial. If something ruckle the chiarra and it ruckle the kevan then it snicker the alleen. If something is nosohusial then it complicate the schuyler. The chiarra does not like the kevan.", "logic": "\nChimerical(chiarra)\nComplicate(chiarra, alleen)\nSnicker(chiarra, kevan)\nComplicate(schuyler, chiarra)\nRuckle(schuyler, chiarra)\nRuckle(schuyler, alleen)\nComplicate(alleen, chiarra)\nRuckle(alleen, kevan)\nSnicker(alleen, chiarra)\nCaducous(kevan)\nComplicate(kevan, alleen)\nSnicker(kevan, chiarra)\nforall x (Chimerical(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\nforall x (Ruckle(x, alleen) -> Chimerical(x))\nforall x (Complicate(x, kevan) -> Shoed(kevan))\nforall x (Snicker(x, kevan) -> Nosohusial(x))\nforall x (Ruckle(x, chiarra) and Ruckle(x, kevan) -> Snicker(x, alleen))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> Complicate(x, schuyler))\n\nnot Complicate(chiarra, kevan)\n\nnot Complicate(chiarra, kevan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The camel is rigorous. The camel debrief the johnny. The camel authorize the concordia. The kari debrief the camel. The kari incurvate the camel. The kari incurvate the johnny. The johnny debrief the camel. The johnny incurvate the concordia. The johnny authorize the camel. The concordia is compelling. The concordia debrief the johnny. The concordia authorize the camel. All rigorous things are prayerful. If something incurvate the johnny then it is rigorous. If something debrief the concordia then the concordia is planless. If something authorize the concordia then it is prayerful. If something incurvate the camel and it incurvate the concordia then it authorize the johnny. If something is prayerful then it debrief the kari. The concordia debrief the concordia.", "logic": "\nRigorous(camel)\nDebrief(camel, johnny)\nAuthorize(camel, concordia)\nDebrief(kari, camel)\nIncurvate(kari, camel)\nIncurvate(kari, johnny)\nDebrief(johnny, camel)\nIncurvate(johnny, concordia)\nAuthorize(johnny, camel)\nCompelling(concordia)\nDebrief(concordia, johnny)\nAuthorize(concordia, camel)\nforall x (Rigorous(x) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, johnny) -> Rigorous(x))\nforall x (Debrief(x, concordia) -> Planless(concordia))\nforall x (Authorize(x, concordia) -> Prayerful(x))\nforall x (Incurvate(x, camel) and Incurvate(x, concordia) -> Authorize(x, johnny))\nforall x (Prayerful(x) -> Debrief(x, kari))\n\nDebrief(concordia, concordia)\n\nDebrief(concordia, concordia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1398"} {"premises": "The annalise is slowgoing. The annalise oxygenise the angelico. The annalise retrovert the lurline. The annalise retrovert the angelico. The lurline is brisant. The lurline oxygenise the annalise. The lurline retrovert the annalise. The lurline premise the angelico. The angelico is omissible. The angelico is slowgoing. The angelico is stuffed. The angelico is exuberant. The angelico oxygenise the lurline. The angelico retrovert the annalise. The angelico retrovert the lurline. The angelico premise the annalise. If something is brisant and it retrovert the annalise then the annalise is omissible. If something oxygenise the lurline and it premise the angelico then the angelico premise the annalise. If something retrovert the lurline and it retrovert the annalise then the lurline premise the angelico. The lurline premise the angelico.", "logic": "\nSlowgoing(annalise)\nOxygenise(annalise, angelico)\nRetrovert(annalise, lurline)\nRetrovert(annalise, angelico)\nBrisant(lurline)\nOxygenise(lurline, annalise)\nRetrovert(lurline, annalise)\nPremise(lurline, angelico)\nOmissible(angelico)\nSlowgoing(angelico)\nStuffed(angelico)\nExuberant(angelico)\nOxygenise(angelico, lurline)\nRetrovert(angelico, annalise)\nRetrovert(angelico, lurline)\nPremise(angelico, annalise)\nforall x (Brisant(x) and Retrovert(x, annalise) -> Omissible(annalise))\nforall x (Oxygenise(x, lurline) and Premise(x, angelico) -> Premise(angelico, annalise))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, lurline) and Retrovert(x, annalise) -> Premise(lurline, angelico))\n\nPremise(lurline, angelico)\n\ntherefore Premise(lurline, angelico)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "The fan is permeable. The fan crop the jennilee. The fan astound the maridel. The fan astound the jennilee. The maridel is formal. The maridel crop the fan. The maridel astound the fan. The maridel elevate the jennilee. The jennilee is mournful. The jennilee is permeable. The jennilee is mettlesome. The jennilee is avascular. The jennilee crop the maridel. The jennilee astound the fan. The jennilee astound the maridel. The jennilee elevate the fan. If something is formal and it astound the fan then the fan is mournful. If something crop the maridel and it elevate the jennilee then the jennilee elevate the fan. If something astound the maridel and it astound the fan then the maridel elevate the jennilee. The jennilee does not need the fan.", "logic": "\nPermeable(fan)\nCrop(fan, jennilee)\nAstound(fan, maridel)\nAstound(fan, jennilee)\nFormal(maridel)\nCrop(maridel, fan)\nAstound(maridel, fan)\nElevate(maridel, jennilee)\nMournful(jennilee)\nPermeable(jennilee)\nMettlesome(jennilee)\nAvascular(jennilee)\nCrop(jennilee, maridel)\nAstound(jennilee, fan)\nAstound(jennilee, maridel)\nElevate(jennilee, fan)\nforall x (Formal(x) and Astound(x, fan) -> Mournful(fan))\nforall x (Crop(x, maridel) and Elevate(x, jennilee) -> Elevate(jennilee, fan))\nforall x (Astound(x, maridel) and Astound(x, fan) -> Elevate(maridel, jennilee))\n\nnot Astound(jennilee, fan)\n\ntherefore Astound(jennilee, fan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "The georgia is cuprous. The georgia slate the isabelle. The georgia lifehack the clayborne. The georgia lifehack the isabelle. The clayborne is certified. The clayborne slate the georgia. The clayborne lifehack the georgia. The clayborne blazon the isabelle. The isabelle is doddery. The isabelle is cuprous. The isabelle is worthy. The isabelle is idealized. The isabelle slate the clayborne. The isabelle lifehack the georgia. The isabelle lifehack the clayborne. The isabelle blazon the georgia. If something is certified and it lifehack the georgia then the georgia is doddery. If something slate the clayborne and it blazon the isabelle then the isabelle blazon the georgia. If something lifehack the clayborne and it lifehack the georgia then the clayborne blazon the isabelle. The georgia is doddery.", "logic": "\nCuprous(georgia)\nSlate(georgia, isabelle)\nLifehack(georgia, clayborne)\nLifehack(georgia, isabelle)\nCertified(clayborne)\nSlate(clayborne, georgia)\nLifehack(clayborne, georgia)\nBlazon(clayborne, isabelle)\nDoddery(isabelle)\nCuprous(isabelle)\nWorthy(isabelle)\nIdealized(isabelle)\nSlate(isabelle, clayborne)\nLifehack(isabelle, georgia)\nLifehack(isabelle, clayborne)\nBlazon(isabelle, georgia)\nforall x (Certified(x) and Lifehack(x, georgia) -> Doddery(georgia))\nforall x (Slate(x, clayborne) and Blazon(x, isabelle) -> Blazon(isabelle, georgia))\nforall x (Lifehack(x, clayborne) and Lifehack(x, georgia) -> Blazon(clayborne, isabelle))\n\nDoddery(georgia)\n\nCertified(clayborne) and Lifehack(clayborne, georgia) and forall x (Certified(x) and Lifehack(x, georgia) -> Doddery(georgia)) -> therefore Doddery(georgia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "The joy is carbonylic. The joy disaffect the marty. The joy resound the naomi. The joy resound the marty. The naomi is gathered. The naomi disaffect the joy. The naomi resound the joy. The naomi engrave the marty. The marty is compelling. The marty is carbonylic. The marty is classic. The marty is acquitted. The marty disaffect the naomi. The marty resound the joy. The marty resound the naomi. The marty engrave the joy. If something is gathered and it resound the joy then the joy is compelling. If something disaffect the naomi and it engrave the marty then the marty engrave the joy. If something resound the naomi and it resound the joy then the naomi engrave the marty. The joy is not compelling.", "logic": "\nCarbonylic(joy)\nDisaffect(joy, marty)\nResound(joy, naomi)\nResound(joy, marty)\nGathered(naomi)\nDisaffect(naomi, joy)\nResound(naomi, joy)\nEngrave(naomi, marty)\nCompelling(marty)\nCarbonylic(marty)\nClassic(marty)\nAcquitted(marty)\nDisaffect(marty, naomi)\nResound(marty, joy)\nResound(marty, naomi)\nEngrave(marty, joy)\nforall x (Gathered(x) and Resound(x, joy) -> Compelling(joy))\nforall x (Disaffect(x, naomi) and Engrave(x, marty) -> Engrave(marty, joy))\nforall x (Resound(x, naomi) and Resound(x, joy) -> Engrave(naomi, marty))\n\nnot Compelling(joy)\n\nGathered(naomi) and Resound(naomi, joy) and forall x (Gathered(x) and Resound(x, joy) -> Compelling(joy)) -> therefore Compelling(joy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "The etheline is bungling. The etheline discompose the jeri. The etheline reticulate the freddie. The etheline reticulate the jeri. The freddie is waning. The freddie discompose the etheline. The freddie reticulate the etheline. The freddie befuddle the jeri. The jeri is mock. The jeri is bungling. The jeri is faithless. The jeri is little. The jeri discompose the freddie. The jeri reticulate the etheline. The jeri reticulate the freddie. The jeri befuddle the etheline. If something is waning and it reticulate the etheline then the etheline is mock. If something discompose the freddie and it befuddle the jeri then the jeri befuddle the etheline. If something reticulate the freddie and it reticulate the etheline then the freddie befuddle the jeri. The freddie does not need the freddie.", "logic": "\nBungling(etheline)\nDiscompose(etheline, jeri)\nReticulate(etheline, freddie)\nReticulate(etheline, jeri)\nWaning(freddie)\nDiscompose(freddie, etheline)\nReticulate(freddie, etheline)\nBefuddle(freddie, jeri)\nMock(jeri)\nBungling(jeri)\nFaithless(jeri)\nLittle(jeri)\nDiscompose(jeri, freddie)\nReticulate(jeri, etheline)\nReticulate(jeri, freddie)\nBefuddle(jeri, etheline)\nforall x (Waning(x) and Reticulate(x, etheline) -> Mock(etheline))\nforall x (Discompose(x, freddie) and Befuddle(x, jeri) -> Befuddle(jeri, etheline))\nforall x (Reticulate(x, freddie) and Reticulate(x, etheline) -> Befuddle(freddie, jeri))\n\nnot Reticulate(freddie, freddie)\n\nnot Reticulate(freddie, freddie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "The janessa is singable. The janessa catnap the ami. The janessa reaffirm the davine. The janessa reaffirm the ami. The davine is surly. The davine catnap the janessa. The davine reaffirm the janessa. The davine borrow the ami. The ami is chilean. The ami is singable. The ami is adient. The ami is skanky. The ami catnap the davine. The ami reaffirm the janessa. The ami reaffirm the davine. The ami borrow the janessa. If something is surly and it reaffirm the janessa then the janessa is chilean. If something catnap the davine and it borrow the ami then the ami borrow the janessa. If something reaffirm the davine and it reaffirm the janessa then the davine borrow the ami. The davine borrow the davine.", "logic": "\nSingable(janessa)\nCatnap(janessa, ami)\nReaffirm(janessa, davine)\nReaffirm(janessa, ami)\nSurly(davine)\nCatnap(davine, janessa)\nReaffirm(davine, janessa)\nBorrow(davine, ami)\nChilean(ami)\nSingable(ami)\nAdient(ami)\nSkanky(ami)\nCatnap(ami, davine)\nReaffirm(ami, janessa)\nReaffirm(ami, davine)\nBorrow(ami, janessa)\nforall x (Surly(x) and Reaffirm(x, janessa) -> Chilean(janessa))\nforall x (Catnap(x, davine) and Borrow(x, ami) -> Borrow(ami, janessa))\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, davine) and Reaffirm(x, janessa) -> Borrow(davine, ami))\n\nBorrow(davine, davine)\n\nBorrow(davine, davine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "The jeff is ectodermic. The jeff dialyse the zachery. The jeff bubble the rora. The jeff bubble the zachery. The rora is jetting. The rora dialyse the jeff. The rora bubble the jeff. The rora outwit the zachery. The zachery is orthopedic. The zachery is ectodermic. The zachery is remittent. The zachery is scots. The zachery dialyse the rora. The zachery bubble the jeff. The zachery bubble the rora. The zachery outwit the jeff. If something is jetting and it bubble the jeff then the jeff is orthopedic. If something dialyse the rora and it outwit the zachery then the zachery outwit the jeff. If something bubble the rora and it bubble the jeff then the rora outwit the zachery. The jeff is not jetting.", "logic": "\nEctodermic(jeff)\nDialyse(jeff, zachery)\nBubble(jeff, rora)\nBubble(jeff, zachery)\nJetting(rora)\nDialyse(rora, jeff)\nBubble(rora, jeff)\nOutwit(rora, zachery)\nOrthopedic(zachery)\nEctodermic(zachery)\nRemittent(zachery)\nScots(zachery)\nDialyse(zachery, rora)\nBubble(zachery, jeff)\nBubble(zachery, rora)\nOutwit(zachery, jeff)\nforall x (Jetting(x) and Bubble(x, jeff) -> Orthopedic(jeff))\nforall x (Dialyse(x, rora) and Outwit(x, zachery) -> Outwit(zachery, jeff))\nforall x (Bubble(x, rora) and Bubble(x, jeff) -> Outwit(rora, zachery))\n\nnot Jetting(jeff)\n\nnot Jetting(jeff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "The dorrie is unsaid. The dorrie waterproof the max. The dorrie buoy the malcolm. The dorrie buoy the max. The malcolm is clxxx. The malcolm waterproof the dorrie. The malcolm buoy the dorrie. The malcolm disarm the max. The max is rimed. The max is unsaid. The max is retractile. The max is secretive. The max waterproof the malcolm. The max buoy the dorrie. The max buoy the malcolm. The max disarm the dorrie. If something is clxxx and it buoy the dorrie then the dorrie is rimed. If something waterproof the malcolm and it disarm the max then the max disarm the dorrie. If something buoy the malcolm and it buoy the dorrie then the malcolm disarm the max. The dorrie disarm the malcolm.", "logic": "\nUnsaid(dorrie)\nWaterproof(dorrie, max)\nBuoy(dorrie, malcolm)\nBuoy(dorrie, max)\nClxxx(malcolm)\nWaterproof(malcolm, dorrie)\nBuoy(malcolm, dorrie)\nDisarm(malcolm, max)\nRimed(max)\nUnsaid(max)\nRetractile(max)\nSecretive(max)\nWaterproof(max, malcolm)\nBuoy(max, dorrie)\nBuoy(max, malcolm)\nDisarm(max, dorrie)\nforall x (Clxxx(x) and Buoy(x, dorrie) -> Rimed(dorrie))\nforall x (Waterproof(x, malcolm) and Disarm(x, max) -> Disarm(max, dorrie))\nforall x (Buoy(x, malcolm) and Buoy(x, dorrie) -> Disarm(malcolm, max))\n\nDisarm(dorrie, malcolm)\n\nDisarm(dorrie, malcolm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1877"} {"premises": "Audry is untuneful. Audry is refractory. Abbie is refractory. Red things are crenate. Rough, untuneful things are remorseful. If Audry is helminthic then Audry is ruled. Audry is untuneful.", "logic": "\nUntuneful(audry)\nRefractory(audry)\nRefractory(abbie)\nforall x (Refractory(x) -> Crenate(x))\nforall x (Crenate(x) and Untuneful(x) -> Remorseful(x))\nHelminthic(audry) -> Ruled(audry)\n\nUntuneful(audry)\n\ntherefore Untuneful(audry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Phylys is liege. Phylys is flaky. Udell is flaky. Red things are sneezy. Rough, liege things are usurious. If Phylys is brindled then Phylys is liable. Phylys is not liege.", "logic": "\nLiege(phylys)\nFlaky(phylys)\nFlaky(udell)\nforall x (Flaky(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Sneezy(x) and Liege(x) -> Usurious(x))\nBrindled(phylys) -> Liable(phylys)\n\nnot Liege(phylys)\n\ntherefore Liege(phylys)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Anurag is nasal. Anurag is zairese. Wolfy is zairese. Red things are cathedral. Rough, nasal things are asian. If Anurag is bowlegged then Anurag is permeative. Anurag is cathedral.", "logic": "\nNasal(anurag)\nZairese(anurag)\nZairese(wolfy)\nforall x (Zairese(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Cathedral(x) and Nasal(x) -> Asian(x))\nBowlegged(anurag) -> Permeative(anurag)\n\nCathedral(anurag)\n\nZairese(anurag) and forall x (Zairese(x) -> Cathedral(x)) -> therefore Cathedral(anurag)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Alison is urceolate. Alison is hypnotic. Zonda is hypnotic. Red things are unheeding. Rough, urceolate things are silklike. If Alison is joyless then Alison is hogged. Zonda is not unheeding.", "logic": "\nUrceolate(alison)\nHypnotic(alison)\nHypnotic(zonda)\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nforall x (Unheeding(x) and Urceolate(x) -> Silklike(x))\nJoyless(alison) -> Hogged(alison)\n\nnot Unheeding(zonda)\n\nHypnotic(zonda) and forall x (Hypnotic(x) -> Unheeding(x)) -> therefore Unheeding(zonda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Crista is congealed. Crista is sandlike. Rolando is sandlike. Red things are delayed. Rough, congealed things are custodial. If Crista is immense then Crista is japanese. Crista is custodial.", "logic": "\nCongealed(crista)\nSandlike(crista)\nSandlike(rolando)\nforall x (Sandlike(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) and Congealed(x) -> Custodial(x))\nImmense(crista) -> Japanese(crista)\n\nCustodial(crista)\n\nSandlike(crista) and forall x (Sandlike(x) -> Delayed(x)) -> therefore Delayed(crista) Delayed(crista) and Congealed(crista) and forall x (Delayed(x) and Congealed(x) -> Custodial(x)) -> therefore Custodial(crista)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Seka is anatomic. Seka is honied. Cordelia is honied. Red things are semiliquid. Rough, anatomic things are paediatric. If Seka is naturistic then Seka is skyward. Seka is not paediatric.", "logic": "\nAnatomic(seka)\nHonied(seka)\nHonied(cordelia)\nforall x (Honied(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Paediatric(x))\nNaturistic(seka) -> Skyward(seka)\n\nnot Paediatric(seka)\n\nHonied(seka) and forall x (Honied(x) -> Semiliquid(x)) -> therefore Semiliquid(seka) Semiliquid(seka) and Anatomic(seka) and forall x (Semiliquid(x) and Anatomic(x) -> Paediatric(x)) -> therefore Paediatric(seka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Kurt is cecal. Kurt is freakish. Willard is freakish. Red things are furious. Rough, cecal things are bimetal. If Kurt is occult then Kurt is unangry. Kurt is not unangry.", "logic": "\nCecal(kurt)\nFreakish(kurt)\nFreakish(willard)\nforall x (Freakish(x) -> Furious(x))\nforall x (Furious(x) and Cecal(x) -> Bimetal(x))\nOccult(kurt) -> Unangry(kurt)\n\nnot Unangry(kurt)\n\nOccult(kurt) -> Unangry(kurt) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Delly is northbound. Delly is vicarious. Doyle is vicarious. Red things are indoor. Rough, northbound things are sitting. If Delly is flavourous then Delly is dipylon. Doyle is sitting.", "logic": "\nNorthbound(delly)\nVicarious(delly)\nVicarious(doyle)\nforall x (Vicarious(x) -> Indoor(x))\nforall x (Indoor(x) and Northbound(x) -> Sitting(x))\nFlavourous(delly) -> Dipylon(delly)\n\nSitting(doyle)\n\nforall x (Indoor(x) and Northbound(x) -> Sitting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Arvie is neuromotor. Arvie is condylar. Mellisa is condylar. Red things are cognizant. Rough, neuromotor things are cruciate. If Arvie is dighted then Arvie is flowered. Mellisa is not flowered.", "logic": "\nNeuromotor(arvie)\nCondylar(arvie)\nCondylar(mellisa)\nforall x (Condylar(x) -> Cognizant(x))\nforall x (Cognizant(x) and Neuromotor(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nDighted(arvie) -> Flowered(arvie)\n\nnot Flowered(mellisa)\n\nnot Flowered(mellisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Susette is uppermost. Susette is glaswegian. Marten is glaswegian. Red things are elect. Rough, uppermost things are earthen. If Susette is hungry then Susette is optative. Marten is quiet.", "logic": "\nUppermost(susette)\nGlaswegian(susette)\nGlaswegian(marten)\nforall x (Glaswegian(x) -> Elect(x))\nforall x (Elect(x) and Uppermost(x) -> Earthen(x))\nHungry(susette) -> Optative(susette)\n\nQuiet(marten)\n\nQuiet(marten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Vivie is defending. Vivie is divalent. Henry is divalent. Red things are snappish. Rough, defending things are exhaustive. If Vivie is acetic then Vivie is mendacious. Henry is not acetic.", "logic": "\nDefending(vivie)\nDivalent(vivie)\nDivalent(henry)\nforall x (Divalent(x) -> Snappish(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) and Defending(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\nAcetic(vivie) -> Mendacious(vivie)\n\nnot Acetic(henry)\n\nnot Acetic(henry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Leese is aciculate. Leese is balletic. Larry is balletic. Red things are gauche. Rough, aciculate things are rare. If Leese is dressed then Leese is victorious. Leese is dressed.", "logic": "\nAciculate(leese)\nBalletic(leese)\nBalletic(larry)\nforall x (Balletic(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) and Aciculate(x) -> Rare(x))\nDressed(leese) -> Victorious(leese)\n\nDressed(leese)\n\nDressed(leese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-856"} {"premises": "Jed is bone. Donielle is not vexing. Parsifal is lavender. If Donielle is not extropic then Donielle is not proclaimed. All lavender things are vexing. White, bone things are vexing. If Parsifal is lavender and Parsifal is extropic then Parsifal is abiding. All related things are proclaimed. If Parsifal is vexing then Parsifal is related. Parsifal is lavender.", "logic": "\nBone(jed)\nnot Vexing(donielle)\nLavender(parsifal)\nnot Extropic(donielle) -> not Proclaimed(donielle)\nforall x (Lavender(x) -> Vexing(x))\nforall x (Proclaimed(x) and Bone(x) -> Vexing(x))\nLavender(parsifal) and Extropic(parsifal) -> Abiding(parsifal)\nforall x (Related(x) -> Proclaimed(x))\nVexing(parsifal) -> Related(parsifal)\n\nLavender(parsifal)\n\ntherefore Lavender(parsifal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Lynn is antiseptic. Karine is not rimless. Raye is elapsed. If Karine is not edgeless then Karine is not riant. All elapsed things are rimless. White, antiseptic things are rimless. If Raye is elapsed and Raye is edgeless then Raye is siberian. All moony things are riant. If Raye is rimless then Raye is moony. Karine is rimless.", "logic": "\nAntiseptic(lynn)\nnot Rimless(karine)\nElapsed(raye)\nnot Edgeless(karine) -> not Riant(karine)\nforall x (Elapsed(x) -> Rimless(x))\nforall x (Riant(x) and Antiseptic(x) -> Rimless(x))\nElapsed(raye) and Edgeless(raye) -> Siberian(raye)\nforall x (Moony(x) -> Riant(x))\nRimless(raye) -> Moony(raye)\n\nRimless(karine)\n\ntherefore not Rimless(karine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Othello is maggoty. Analiese is not bashful. Bernie is reputable. If Analiese is not totipotent then Analiese is not frivolous. All reputable things are bashful. White, maggoty things are bashful. If Bernie is reputable and Bernie is totipotent then Bernie is undershot. All unripe things are frivolous. If Bernie is bashful then Bernie is unripe. Bernie is bashful.", "logic": "\nMaggoty(othello)\nnot Bashful(analiese)\nReputable(bernie)\nnot Totipotent(analiese) -> not Frivolous(analiese)\nforall x (Reputable(x) -> Bashful(x))\nforall x (Frivolous(x) and Maggoty(x) -> Bashful(x))\nReputable(bernie) and Totipotent(bernie) -> Undershot(bernie)\nforall x (Unripe(x) -> Frivolous(x))\nBashful(bernie) -> Unripe(bernie)\n\nBashful(bernie)\n\nReputable(bernie) and forall x (Reputable(x) -> Bashful(x)) -> therefore Bashful(bernie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Elwyn is pinkish. Manuel is not laid. Arlyne is enraged. If Manuel is not aspectual then Manuel is not liver. All enraged things are laid. White, pinkish things are laid. If Arlyne is enraged and Arlyne is aspectual then Arlyne is rampant. All roadless things are liver. If Arlyne is laid then Arlyne is roadless. Arlyne is not laid.", "logic": "\nPinkish(elwyn)\nnot Laid(manuel)\nEnraged(arlyne)\nnot Aspectual(manuel) -> not Liver(manuel)\nforall x (Enraged(x) -> Laid(x))\nforall x (Liver(x) and Pinkish(x) -> Laid(x))\nEnraged(arlyne) and Aspectual(arlyne) -> Rampant(arlyne)\nforall x (Roadless(x) -> Liver(x))\nLaid(arlyne) -> Roadless(arlyne)\n\nnot Laid(arlyne)\n\nEnraged(arlyne) and forall x (Enraged(x) -> Laid(x)) -> therefore Laid(arlyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Pansy is sudsy. Stinky is not ambagious. Kettie is documented. If Stinky is not impugnable then Stinky is not perennial. All documented things are ambagious. White, sudsy things are ambagious. If Kettie is documented and Kettie is impugnable then Kettie is riled. All expressed things are perennial. If Kettie is ambagious then Kettie is expressed. Kettie is expressed.", "logic": "\nSudsy(pansy)\nnot Ambagious(stinky)\nDocumented(kettie)\nnot Impugnable(stinky) -> not Perennial(stinky)\nforall x (Documented(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nforall x (Perennial(x) and Sudsy(x) -> Ambagious(x))\nDocumented(kettie) and Impugnable(kettie) -> Riled(kettie)\nforall x (Expressed(x) -> Perennial(x))\nAmbagious(kettie) -> Expressed(kettie)\n\nExpressed(kettie)\n\nDocumented(kettie) and forall x (Documented(x) -> Ambagious(x)) -> therefore Ambagious(kettie) Ambagious(kettie) and Ambagious(kettie) -> Expressed(kettie) -> therefore Expressed(kettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Eliott is blamable. Jennette is not rwandan. Carley is anthropoid. If Jennette is not icebound then Jennette is not thousandth. All anthropoid things are rwandan. White, blamable things are rwandan. If Carley is anthropoid and Carley is icebound then Carley is shut. All weakening things are thousandth. If Carley is rwandan then Carley is weakening. Carley is not weakening.", "logic": "\nBlamable(eliott)\nnot Rwandan(jennette)\nAnthropoid(carley)\nnot Icebound(jennette) -> not Thousandth(jennette)\nforall x (Anthropoid(x) -> Rwandan(x))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Blamable(x) -> Rwandan(x))\nAnthropoid(carley) and Icebound(carley) -> Shut(carley)\nforall x (Weakening(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nRwandan(carley) -> Weakening(carley)\n\nnot Weakening(carley)\n\nAnthropoid(carley) and forall x (Anthropoid(x) -> Rwandan(x)) -> therefore Rwandan(carley) Rwandan(carley) and Rwandan(carley) -> Weakening(carley) -> therefore Weakening(carley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Quentin is petaled. Maia is not eristic. Zitella is wieldy. If Maia is not consuming then Maia is not megascopic. All wieldy things are eristic. White, petaled things are eristic. If Zitella is wieldy and Zitella is consuming then Zitella is augustan. All spinal things are megascopic. If Zitella is eristic then Zitella is spinal. Zitella is megascopic.", "logic": "\nPetaled(quentin)\nnot Eristic(maia)\nWieldy(zitella)\nnot Consuming(maia) -> not Megascopic(maia)\nforall x (Wieldy(x) -> Eristic(x))\nforall x (Megascopic(x) and Petaled(x) -> Eristic(x))\nWieldy(zitella) and Consuming(zitella) -> Augustan(zitella)\nforall x (Spinal(x) -> Megascopic(x))\nEristic(zitella) -> Spinal(zitella)\n\nMegascopic(zitella)\n\nWieldy(zitella) and forall x (Wieldy(x) -> Eristic(x)) -> therefore Eristic(zitella) Eristic(zitella) and Eristic(zitella) -> Spinal(zitella) -> therefore Spinal(zitella) Spinal(zitella) and forall x (Spinal(x) -> Megascopic(x)) -> therefore Megascopic(zitella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Aurilia is opposed. Frannie is not ageing. Whitby is wroth. If Frannie is not coincident then Frannie is not pareve. All wroth things are ageing. White, opposed things are ageing. If Whitby is wroth and Whitby is coincident then Whitby is jewelled. All bulgarian things are pareve. If Whitby is ageing then Whitby is bulgarian. Whitby is not pareve.", "logic": "\nOpposed(aurilia)\nnot Ageing(frannie)\nWroth(whitby)\nnot Coincident(frannie) -> not Pareve(frannie)\nforall x (Wroth(x) -> Ageing(x))\nforall x (Pareve(x) and Opposed(x) -> Ageing(x))\nWroth(whitby) and Coincident(whitby) -> Jewelled(whitby)\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) -> Pareve(x))\nAgeing(whitby) -> Bulgarian(whitby)\n\nnot Pareve(whitby)\n\nWroth(whitby) and forall x (Wroth(x) -> Ageing(x)) -> therefore Ageing(whitby) Ageing(whitby) and Ageing(whitby) -> Bulgarian(whitby) -> therefore Bulgarian(whitby) Bulgarian(whitby) and forall x (Bulgarian(x) -> Pareve(x)) -> therefore Pareve(whitby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Aziz is sleeveless. Todd is not assignable. Annaliese is figured. If Todd is not acroscopic then Todd is not chaldee. All figured things are assignable. White, sleeveless things are assignable. If Annaliese is figured and Annaliese is acroscopic then Annaliese is manifold. All dreaded things are chaldee. If Annaliese is assignable then Annaliese is dreaded. Aziz is not chaldee.", "logic": "\nSleeveless(aziz)\nnot Assignable(todd)\nFigured(annaliese)\nnot Acroscopic(todd) -> not Chaldee(todd)\nforall x (Figured(x) -> Assignable(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) and Sleeveless(x) -> Assignable(x))\nFigured(annaliese) and Acroscopic(annaliese) -> Manifold(annaliese)\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nAssignable(annaliese) -> Dreaded(annaliese)\n\nnot Chaldee(aziz)\n\nforall x (Dreaded(x) -> Chaldee(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Pryce is blatant. Hilton is not midwestern. Kirsti is calcuttan. If Hilton is not simian then Hilton is not binominal. All calcuttan things are midwestern. White, blatant things are midwestern. If Kirsti is calcuttan and Kirsti is simian then Kirsti is grand. All cataleptic things are binominal. If Kirsti is midwestern then Kirsti is cataleptic. Hilton is binominal.", "logic": "\nBlatant(pryce)\nnot Midwestern(hilton)\nCalcuttan(kirsti)\nnot Simian(hilton) -> not Binominal(hilton)\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nforall x (Binominal(x) and Blatant(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nCalcuttan(kirsti) and Simian(kirsti) -> Grand(kirsti)\nforall x (Cataleptic(x) -> Binominal(x))\nMidwestern(kirsti) -> Cataleptic(kirsti)\n\nBinominal(hilton)\n\nforall x (Cataleptic(x) -> Binominal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Rawley is diarrhetic. Natka is not mocking. Slim is dynamic. If Natka is not insecure then Natka is not bicolor. All dynamic things are mocking. White, diarrhetic things are mocking. If Slim is dynamic and Slim is insecure then Slim is chordate. All attractive things are bicolor. If Slim is mocking then Slim is attractive. Rawley is not mocking.", "logic": "\nDiarrhetic(rawley)\nnot Mocking(natka)\nDynamic(slim)\nnot Insecure(natka) -> not Bicolor(natka)\nforall x (Dynamic(x) -> Mocking(x))\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Diarrhetic(x) -> Mocking(x))\nDynamic(slim) and Insecure(slim) -> Chordate(slim)\nforall x (Attractive(x) -> Bicolor(x))\nMocking(slim) -> Attractive(slim)\n\nnot Mocking(rawley)\n\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Diarrhetic(x) -> Mocking(x)) <- forall x (Attractive(x) -> Bicolor(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Birgitta is reducible. Pam is not ordered. Charo is assuring. If Pam is not unended then Pam is not derivable. All assuring things are ordered. White, reducible things are ordered. If Charo is assuring and Charo is unended then Charo is tripartite. All rash things are derivable. If Charo is ordered then Charo is rash. Charo is tripartite.", "logic": "\nReducible(birgitta)\nnot Ordered(pam)\nAssuring(charo)\nnot Unended(pam) -> not Derivable(pam)\nforall x (Assuring(x) -> Ordered(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) and Reducible(x) -> Ordered(x))\nAssuring(charo) and Unended(charo) -> Tripartite(charo)\nforall x (Rash(x) -> Derivable(x))\nOrdered(charo) -> Rash(charo)\n\nTripartite(charo)\n\nAssuring(charo) and Unended(charo) -> Tripartite(charo) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Iggy is braggy. Fremont is not catechetic. Trixie is rank. If Fremont is not copesettic then Fremont is not overfond. All rank things are catechetic. White, braggy things are catechetic. If Trixie is rank and Trixie is copesettic then Trixie is watertight. All undogmatic things are overfond. If Trixie is catechetic then Trixie is undogmatic. Fremont is not copesettic.", "logic": "\nBraggy(iggy)\nnot Catechetic(fremont)\nRank(trixie)\nnot Copesettic(fremont) -> not Overfond(fremont)\nforall x (Rank(x) -> Catechetic(x))\nforall x (Overfond(x) and Braggy(x) -> Catechetic(x))\nRank(trixie) and Copesettic(trixie) -> Watertight(trixie)\nforall x (Undogmatic(x) -> Overfond(x))\nCatechetic(trixie) -> Undogmatic(trixie)\n\nnot Copesettic(fremont)\n\nnot Copesettic(fremont) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Ernesta is champleve. Katerine is not sunken. Walton is asian. If Katerine is not regressive then Katerine is not cerebellar. All asian things are sunken. White, champleve things are sunken. If Walton is asian and Walton is regressive then Walton is untruthful. All gibbose things are cerebellar. If Walton is sunken then Walton is gibbose. Katerine is asian.", "logic": "\nChampleve(ernesta)\nnot Sunken(katerine)\nAsian(walton)\nnot Regressive(katerine) -> not Cerebellar(katerine)\nforall x (Asian(x) -> Sunken(x))\nforall x (Cerebellar(x) and Champleve(x) -> Sunken(x))\nAsian(walton) and Regressive(walton) -> Untruthful(walton)\nforall x (Gibbose(x) -> Cerebellar(x))\nSunken(walton) -> Gibbose(walton)\n\nAsian(katerine)\n\nAsian(katerine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Freida is honorific. Liana is not arsenical. Jennine is fleet. If Liana is not ribald then Liana is not sandy. All fleet things are arsenical. White, honorific things are arsenical. If Jennine is fleet and Jennine is ribald then Jennine is breakable. All agelong things are sandy. If Jennine is arsenical then Jennine is agelong. Jennine is not ribald.", "logic": "\nHonorific(freida)\nnot Arsenical(liana)\nFleet(jennine)\nnot Ribald(liana) -> not Sandy(liana)\nforall x (Fleet(x) -> Arsenical(x))\nforall x (Sandy(x) and Honorific(x) -> Arsenical(x))\nFleet(jennine) and Ribald(jennine) -> Breakable(jennine)\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Sandy(x))\nArsenical(jennine) -> Agelong(jennine)\n\nnot Ribald(jennine)\n\nnot Ribald(jennine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "Karen is compound. Dedra is not material. Alis is crippling. If Dedra is not deceptive then Dedra is not bivalent. All crippling things are material. White, compound things are material. If Alis is crippling and Alis is deceptive then Alis is amorous. All miffed things are bivalent. If Alis is material then Alis is miffed. Karen is crippling.", "logic": "\nCompound(karen)\nnot Material(dedra)\nCrippling(alis)\nnot Deceptive(dedra) -> not Bivalent(dedra)\nforall x (Crippling(x) -> Material(x))\nforall x (Bivalent(x) and Compound(x) -> Material(x))\nCrippling(alis) and Deceptive(alis) -> Amorous(alis)\nforall x (Miffed(x) -> Bivalent(x))\nMaterial(alis) -> Miffed(alis)\n\nCrippling(karen)\n\nCrippling(karen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-365"} {"premises": "The amalita is not bovine. The amalita is through. The amalita is bahraini. The amalita is bated. The amalita is not affined. If the amalita is not bated then the amalita is not through. The amalita is not affined.", "logic": "\nnot Bovine(amalita)\nThrough(amalita)\nBahraini(amalita)\nBated(amalita)\nnot Affined(amalita)\nnot Bated(amalita) -> not Through(amalita)\n\nnot Affined(amalita)\n\ntherefore not Affined(amalita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2441"} {"premises": "The giacinta is not stoppered. The giacinta is riled. The giacinta is dispensed. The giacinta is hangdog. The giacinta is not turkmen. If the giacinta is not hangdog then the giacinta is not riled. The giacinta is not dispensed.", "logic": "\nnot Stoppered(giacinta)\nRiled(giacinta)\nDispensed(giacinta)\nHangdog(giacinta)\nnot Turkmen(giacinta)\nnot Hangdog(giacinta) -> not Riled(giacinta)\n\nnot Dispensed(giacinta)\n\ntherefore Dispensed(giacinta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2441"} {"premises": "The isidore is not sere. The isidore is crocked. The isidore is obstructed. The isidore is gangrenous. The isidore is not sundried. If the isidore is not gangrenous then the isidore is not crocked. The isidore does not eat the isidore.", "logic": "\nnot Sere(isidore)\nCrocked(isidore)\nObstructed(isidore)\nGangrenous(isidore)\nnot Sundried(isidore)\nnot Gangrenous(isidore) -> not Crocked(isidore)\n\nnot Eats(isidore, isidore)\n\nnot Eats(isidore, isidore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2441"} {"premises": "The kissiah is not apraxic. The kissiah is decimal. The kissiah is pathless. The kissiah is illiterate. The kissiah is not adjuvant. If the kissiah is not illiterate then the kissiah is not decimal. The kissiah needs the kissiah.", "logic": "\nnot Apraxic(kissiah)\nDecimal(kissiah)\nPathless(kissiah)\nIlliterate(kissiah)\nnot Adjuvant(kissiah)\nnot Illiterate(kissiah) -> not Decimal(kissiah)\n\nNeeds(kissiah, kissiah)\n\nNeeds(kissiah, kissiah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2441"} {"premises": "The hillel singsong the ciara. The hillel singsong the herbert. The ciara is monolithic. The ciara caramelise the hillel. The ciara caramelise the herbert. The ciara singsong the herbert. The ciara cavil the herbert. The herbert is unyielding. The herbert caramelise the hillel. The herbert singsong the hillel. If someone caramelise the herbert then they like the ciara. If someone singsong the ciara and the ciara caramelise the herbert then they visit the ciara. If someone singsong the ciara then the ciara is monolithic. If someone cavil the ciara and the ciara caramelise the herbert then they need the hillel. If someone caramelise the hillel then the hillel is monolithic. If someone caramelise the hillel then they need the ciara. The ciara caramelise the hillel.", "logic": "\nSingsong(hillel, ciara)\nSingsong(hillel, herbert)\nMonolithic(ciara)\nCaramelise(ciara, hillel)\nCaramelise(ciara, herbert)\nSingsong(ciara, herbert)\nCavil(ciara, herbert)\nUnyielding(herbert)\nCaramelise(herbert, hillel)\nSingsong(herbert, hillel)\nforall x (Caramelise(x, herbert) -> Caramelise(x, ciara))\nforall x (Singsong(x, ciara) and Caramelise(ciara, herbert) -> Cavil(x, ciara))\nforall x (Singsong(x, ciara) -> Monolithic(ciara))\nforall x (Cavil(x, ciara) and Caramelise(ciara, herbert) -> Singsong(x, hillel))\nforall x (Caramelise(x, hillel) -> Monolithic(hillel))\nforall x (Caramelise(x, hillel) -> Singsong(x, ciara))\n\nCaramelise(ciara, hillel)\n\ntherefore Caramelise(ciara, hillel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The kevina segue the elysee. The kevina segue the sandye. The elysee is balconied. The elysee found the kevina. The elysee found the sandye. The elysee segue the sandye. The elysee expense the sandye. The sandye is carinal. The sandye found the kevina. The sandye segue the kevina. If someone found the sandye then they like the elysee. If someone segue the elysee and the elysee found the sandye then they visit the elysee. If someone segue the elysee then the elysee is balconied. If someone expense the elysee and the elysee found the sandye then they need the kevina. If someone found the kevina then the kevina is balconied. If someone found the kevina then they need the elysee. The sandye is not carinal.", "logic": "\nSegue(kevina, elysee)\nSegue(kevina, sandye)\nBalconied(elysee)\nFound(elysee, kevina)\nFound(elysee, sandye)\nSegue(elysee, sandye)\nExpense(elysee, sandye)\nCarinal(sandye)\nFound(sandye, kevina)\nSegue(sandye, kevina)\nforall x (Found(x, sandye) -> Found(x, elysee))\nforall x (Segue(x, elysee) and Found(elysee, sandye) -> Expense(x, elysee))\nforall x (Segue(x, elysee) -> Balconied(elysee))\nforall x (Expense(x, elysee) and Found(elysee, sandye) -> Segue(x, kevina))\nforall x (Found(x, kevina) -> Balconied(kevina))\nforall x (Found(x, kevina) -> Segue(x, elysee))\n\nnot Carinal(sandye)\n\ntherefore Carinal(sandye)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The malkah call the yehudi. The malkah call the rudolfo. The yehudi is uncanny. The yehudi intensify the malkah. The yehudi intensify the rudolfo. The yehudi call the rudolfo. The yehudi etherize the rudolfo. The rudolfo is equipped. The rudolfo intensify the malkah. The rudolfo call the malkah. If someone intensify the rudolfo then they like the yehudi. If someone call the yehudi and the yehudi intensify the rudolfo then they visit the yehudi. If someone call the yehudi then the yehudi is uncanny. If someone etherize the yehudi and the yehudi intensify the rudolfo then they need the malkah. If someone intensify the malkah then the malkah is uncanny. If someone intensify the malkah then they need the yehudi. The rudolfo call the yehudi.", "logic": "\nCall(malkah, yehudi)\nCall(malkah, rudolfo)\nUncanny(yehudi)\nIntensify(yehudi, malkah)\nIntensify(yehudi, rudolfo)\nCall(yehudi, rudolfo)\nEtherize(yehudi, rudolfo)\nEquipped(rudolfo)\nIntensify(rudolfo, malkah)\nCall(rudolfo, malkah)\nforall x (Intensify(x, rudolfo) -> Intensify(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Call(x, yehudi) and Intensify(yehudi, rudolfo) -> Etherize(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Call(x, yehudi) -> Uncanny(yehudi))\nforall x (Etherize(x, yehudi) and Intensify(yehudi, rudolfo) -> Call(x, malkah))\nforall x (Intensify(x, malkah) -> Uncanny(malkah))\nforall x (Intensify(x, malkah) -> Call(x, yehudi))\n\nCall(rudolfo, yehudi)\n\nIntensify(rudolfo, malkah) and forall x (Intensify(x, malkah) -> Call(x, yehudi)) -> therefore Call(rudolfo, yehudi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The grant unreel the linzy. The grant unreel the barrett. The linzy is brushlike. The linzy effloresce the grant. The linzy effloresce the barrett. The linzy unreel the barrett. The linzy enter the barrett. The barrett is collective. The barrett effloresce the grant. The barrett unreel the grant. If someone effloresce the barrett then they like the linzy. If someone unreel the linzy and the linzy effloresce the barrett then they visit the linzy. If someone unreel the linzy then the linzy is brushlike. If someone enter the linzy and the linzy effloresce the barrett then they need the grant. If someone effloresce the grant then the grant is brushlike. If someone effloresce the grant then they need the linzy. The grant does not visit the linzy.", "logic": "\nUnreel(grant, linzy)\nUnreel(grant, barrett)\nBrushlike(linzy)\nEffloresce(linzy, grant)\nEffloresce(linzy, barrett)\nUnreel(linzy, barrett)\nEnter(linzy, barrett)\nCollective(barrett)\nEffloresce(barrett, grant)\nUnreel(barrett, grant)\nforall x (Effloresce(x, barrett) -> Effloresce(x, linzy))\nforall x (Unreel(x, linzy) and Effloresce(linzy, barrett) -> Enter(x, linzy))\nforall x (Unreel(x, linzy) -> Brushlike(linzy))\nforall x (Enter(x, linzy) and Effloresce(linzy, barrett) -> Unreel(x, grant))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, grant) -> Brushlike(grant))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, grant) -> Unreel(x, linzy))\n\nnot Enter(grant, linzy)\n\nUnreel(grant, linzy) and Effloresce(linzy, barrett) and forall x (Unreel(x, linzy) and Effloresce(linzy, barrett) -> Enter(x, linzy)) -> therefore Enter(grant, linzy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The ruthann interest the anthia. The ruthann interest the zach. The anthia is astute. The anthia convalesce the ruthann. The anthia convalesce the zach. The anthia interest the zach. The anthia parallel the zach. The zach is jihadi. The zach convalesce the ruthann. The zach interest the ruthann. If someone convalesce the zach then they like the anthia. If someone interest the anthia and the anthia convalesce the zach then they visit the anthia. If someone interest the anthia then the anthia is astute. If someone parallel the anthia and the anthia convalesce the zach then they need the ruthann. If someone convalesce the ruthann then the ruthann is astute. If someone convalesce the ruthann then they need the anthia. The zach parallel the anthia.", "logic": "\nInterest(ruthann, anthia)\nInterest(ruthann, zach)\nAstute(anthia)\nConvalesce(anthia, ruthann)\nConvalesce(anthia, zach)\nInterest(anthia, zach)\nParallel(anthia, zach)\nJihadi(zach)\nConvalesce(zach, ruthann)\nInterest(zach, ruthann)\nforall x (Convalesce(x, zach) -> Convalesce(x, anthia))\nforall x (Interest(x, anthia) and Convalesce(anthia, zach) -> Parallel(x, anthia))\nforall x (Interest(x, anthia) -> Astute(anthia))\nforall x (Parallel(x, anthia) and Convalesce(anthia, zach) -> Interest(x, ruthann))\nforall x (Convalesce(x, ruthann) -> Astute(ruthann))\nforall x (Convalesce(x, ruthann) -> Interest(x, anthia))\n\nParallel(zach, anthia)\n\nConvalesce(zach, ruthann) and forall x (Convalesce(x, ruthann) -> Interest(x, anthia)) -> therefore Interest(zach, anthia) Interest(zach, anthia) and Convalesce(anthia, zach) and forall x (Interest(x, anthia) and Convalesce(anthia, zach) -> Parallel(x, anthia)) -> therefore Parallel(zach, anthia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The arthur canoodle the oreste. The arthur canoodle the charlotta. The oreste is befitting. The oreste trammel the arthur. The oreste trammel the charlotta. The oreste canoodle the charlotta. The oreste toenail the charlotta. The charlotta is expectable. The charlotta trammel the arthur. The charlotta canoodle the arthur. If someone trammel the charlotta then they like the oreste. If someone canoodle the oreste and the oreste trammel the charlotta then they visit the oreste. If someone canoodle the oreste then the oreste is befitting. If someone toenail the oreste and the oreste trammel the charlotta then they need the arthur. If someone trammel the arthur then the arthur is befitting. If someone trammel the arthur then they need the oreste. The charlotta does not visit the oreste.", "logic": "\nCanoodle(arthur, oreste)\nCanoodle(arthur, charlotta)\nBefitting(oreste)\nTrammel(oreste, arthur)\nTrammel(oreste, charlotta)\nCanoodle(oreste, charlotta)\nToenail(oreste, charlotta)\nExpectable(charlotta)\nTrammel(charlotta, arthur)\nCanoodle(charlotta, arthur)\nforall x (Trammel(x, charlotta) -> Trammel(x, oreste))\nforall x (Canoodle(x, oreste) and Trammel(oreste, charlotta) -> Toenail(x, oreste))\nforall x (Canoodle(x, oreste) -> Befitting(oreste))\nforall x (Toenail(x, oreste) and Trammel(oreste, charlotta) -> Canoodle(x, arthur))\nforall x (Trammel(x, arthur) -> Befitting(arthur))\nforall x (Trammel(x, arthur) -> Canoodle(x, oreste))\n\nnot Toenail(charlotta, oreste)\n\nTrammel(charlotta, arthur) and forall x (Trammel(x, arthur) -> Canoodle(x, oreste)) -> therefore Canoodle(charlotta, oreste) Canoodle(charlotta, oreste) and Trammel(oreste, charlotta) and forall x (Canoodle(x, oreste) and Trammel(oreste, charlotta) -> Toenail(x, oreste)) -> therefore Toenail(charlotta, oreste)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The amandie twig the abbott. The amandie twig the alfredo. The abbott is eradicable. The abbott meld the amandie. The abbott meld the alfredo. The abbott twig the alfredo. The abbott bundle the alfredo. The alfredo is frore. The alfredo meld the amandie. The alfredo twig the amandie. If someone meld the alfredo then they like the abbott. If someone twig the abbott and the abbott meld the alfredo then they visit the abbott. If someone twig the abbott then the abbott is eradicable. If someone bundle the abbott and the abbott meld the alfredo then they need the amandie. If someone meld the amandie then the amandie is eradicable. If someone meld the amandie then they need the abbott. The abbott twig the amandie.", "logic": "\nTwig(amandie, abbott)\nTwig(amandie, alfredo)\nEradicable(abbott)\nMeld(abbott, amandie)\nMeld(abbott, alfredo)\nTwig(abbott, alfredo)\nBundle(abbott, alfredo)\nFrore(alfredo)\nMeld(alfredo, amandie)\nTwig(alfredo, amandie)\nforall x (Meld(x, alfredo) -> Meld(x, abbott))\nforall x (Twig(x, abbott) and Meld(abbott, alfredo) -> Bundle(x, abbott))\nforall x (Twig(x, abbott) -> Eradicable(abbott))\nforall x (Bundle(x, abbott) and Meld(abbott, alfredo) -> Twig(x, amandie))\nforall x (Meld(x, amandie) -> Eradicable(amandie))\nforall x (Meld(x, amandie) -> Twig(x, abbott))\n\nTwig(abbott, amandie)\n\nMeld(abbott, amandie) and forall x (Meld(x, amandie) -> Twig(x, abbott)) -> therefore Twig(abbott, abbott) Twig(abbott, abbott) and Meld(abbott, alfredo) and forall x (Twig(x, abbott) and Meld(abbott, alfredo) -> Bundle(x, abbott)) -> therefore Bundle(abbott, abbott) Bundle(abbott, abbott) and Meld(abbott, alfredo) and forall x (Bundle(x, abbott) and Meld(abbott, alfredo) -> Twig(x, amandie)) -> therefore Twig(abbott, amandie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The minta harlequin the marylou. The minta harlequin the cordey. The marylou is military. The marylou invalid the minta. The marylou invalid the cordey. The marylou harlequin the cordey. The marylou quack the cordey. The cordey is brickly. The cordey invalid the minta. The cordey harlequin the minta. If someone invalid the cordey then they like the marylou. If someone harlequin the marylou and the marylou invalid the cordey then they visit the marylou. If someone harlequin the marylou then the marylou is military. If someone quack the marylou and the marylou invalid the cordey then they need the minta. If someone invalid the minta then the minta is military. If someone invalid the minta then they need the marylou. The marylou does not need the minta.", "logic": "\nHarlequin(minta, marylou)\nHarlequin(minta, cordey)\nMilitary(marylou)\nInvalid(marylou, minta)\nInvalid(marylou, cordey)\nHarlequin(marylou, cordey)\nQuack(marylou, cordey)\nBrickly(cordey)\nInvalid(cordey, minta)\nHarlequin(cordey, minta)\nforall x (Invalid(x, cordey) -> Invalid(x, marylou))\nforall x (Harlequin(x, marylou) and Invalid(marylou, cordey) -> Quack(x, marylou))\nforall x (Harlequin(x, marylou) -> Military(marylou))\nforall x (Quack(x, marylou) and Invalid(marylou, cordey) -> Harlequin(x, minta))\nforall x (Invalid(x, minta) -> Military(minta))\nforall x (Invalid(x, minta) -> Harlequin(x, marylou))\n\nnot Harlequin(marylou, minta)\n\nInvalid(marylou, minta) and forall x (Invalid(x, minta) -> Harlequin(x, marylou)) -> therefore Harlequin(marylou, marylou) Harlequin(marylou, marylou) and Invalid(marylou, cordey) and forall x (Harlequin(x, marylou) and Invalid(marylou, cordey) -> Quack(x, marylou)) -> therefore Quack(marylou, marylou) Quack(marylou, marylou) and Invalid(marylou, cordey) and forall x (Quack(x, marylou) and Invalid(marylou, cordey) -> Harlequin(x, minta)) -> therefore Harlequin(marylou, minta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The sheree airt the cheslie. The sheree airt the jonis. The cheslie is meatless. The cheslie calligraph the sheree. The cheslie calligraph the jonis. The cheslie airt the jonis. The cheslie dusk the jonis. The jonis is twin. The jonis calligraph the sheree. The jonis airt the sheree. If someone calligraph the jonis then they like the cheslie. If someone airt the cheslie and the cheslie calligraph the jonis then they visit the cheslie. If someone airt the cheslie then the cheslie is meatless. If someone dusk the cheslie and the cheslie calligraph the jonis then they need the sheree. If someone calligraph the sheree then the sheree is meatless. If someone calligraph the sheree then they need the cheslie. The jonis does not like the cheslie.", "logic": "\nAirt(sheree, cheslie)\nAirt(sheree, jonis)\nMeatless(cheslie)\nCalligraph(cheslie, sheree)\nCalligraph(cheslie, jonis)\nAirt(cheslie, jonis)\nDusk(cheslie, jonis)\nTwin(jonis)\nCalligraph(jonis, sheree)\nAirt(jonis, sheree)\nforall x (Calligraph(x, jonis) -> Calligraph(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Airt(x, cheslie) and Calligraph(cheslie, jonis) -> Dusk(x, cheslie))\nforall x (Airt(x, cheslie) -> Meatless(cheslie))\nforall x (Dusk(x, cheslie) and Calligraph(cheslie, jonis) -> Airt(x, sheree))\nforall x (Calligraph(x, sheree) -> Meatless(sheree))\nforall x (Calligraph(x, sheree) -> Airt(x, cheslie))\n\nnot Calligraph(jonis, cheslie)\n\nforall x (Calligraph(x, jonis) -> Calligraph(x, cheslie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The ardelia imbricate the aamir. The ardelia imbricate the aldis. The aamir is piagetian. The aamir carp the ardelia. The aamir carp the aldis. The aamir imbricate the aldis. The aamir wedge the aldis. The aldis is zero. The aldis carp the ardelia. The aldis imbricate the ardelia. If someone carp the aldis then they like the aamir. If someone imbricate the aamir and the aamir carp the aldis then they visit the aamir. If someone imbricate the aamir then the aamir is piagetian. If someone wedge the aamir and the aamir carp the aldis then they need the ardelia. If someone carp the ardelia then the ardelia is piagetian. If someone carp the ardelia then they need the aamir. The ardelia carp the aamir.", "logic": "\nImbricate(ardelia, aamir)\nImbricate(ardelia, aldis)\nPiagetian(aamir)\nCarp(aamir, ardelia)\nCarp(aamir, aldis)\nImbricate(aamir, aldis)\nWedge(aamir, aldis)\nZero(aldis)\nCarp(aldis, ardelia)\nImbricate(aldis, ardelia)\nforall x (Carp(x, aldis) -> Carp(x, aamir))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, aamir) and Carp(aamir, aldis) -> Wedge(x, aamir))\nforall x (Imbricate(x, aamir) -> Piagetian(aamir))\nforall x (Wedge(x, aamir) and Carp(aamir, aldis) -> Imbricate(x, ardelia))\nforall x (Carp(x, ardelia) -> Piagetian(ardelia))\nforall x (Carp(x, ardelia) -> Imbricate(x, aamir))\n\nCarp(ardelia, aamir)\n\nforall x (Carp(x, aldis) -> Carp(x, aamir)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The annetta slalom the merry. The annetta slalom the pearl. The merry is dripless. The merry augur the annetta. The merry augur the pearl. The merry slalom the pearl. The merry ravish the pearl. The pearl is used. The pearl augur the annetta. The pearl slalom the annetta. If someone augur the pearl then they like the merry. If someone slalom the merry and the merry augur the pearl then they visit the merry. If someone slalom the merry then the merry is dripless. If someone ravish the merry and the merry augur the pearl then they need the annetta. If someone augur the annetta then the annetta is dripless. If someone augur the annetta then they need the merry. The pearl is not big.", "logic": "\nSlalom(annetta, merry)\nSlalom(annetta, pearl)\nDripless(merry)\nAugur(merry, annetta)\nAugur(merry, pearl)\nSlalom(merry, pearl)\nRavish(merry, pearl)\nUsed(pearl)\nAugur(pearl, annetta)\nSlalom(pearl, annetta)\nforall x (Augur(x, pearl) -> Augur(x, merry))\nforall x (Slalom(x, merry) and Augur(merry, pearl) -> Ravish(x, merry))\nforall x (Slalom(x, merry) -> Dripless(merry))\nforall x (Ravish(x, merry) and Augur(merry, pearl) -> Slalom(x, annetta))\nforall x (Augur(x, annetta) -> Dripless(annetta))\nforall x (Augur(x, annetta) -> Slalom(x, merry))\n\nnot Big(pearl)\n\nnot Big(pearl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The urson refreshen the sharia. The urson refreshen the reggy. The sharia is unbiased. The sharia truss the urson. The sharia truss the reggy. The sharia refreshen the reggy. The sharia presuppose the reggy. The reggy is unyielding. The reggy truss the urson. The reggy refreshen the urson. If someone truss the reggy then they like the sharia. If someone refreshen the sharia and the sharia truss the reggy then they visit the sharia. If someone refreshen the sharia then the sharia is unbiased. If someone presuppose the sharia and the sharia truss the reggy then they need the urson. If someone truss the urson then the urson is unbiased. If someone truss the urson then they need the sharia. The reggy presuppose the urson.", "logic": "\nRefreshen(urson, sharia)\nRefreshen(urson, reggy)\nUnbiased(sharia)\nTruss(sharia, urson)\nTruss(sharia, reggy)\nRefreshen(sharia, reggy)\nPresuppose(sharia, reggy)\nUnyielding(reggy)\nTruss(reggy, urson)\nRefreshen(reggy, urson)\nforall x (Truss(x, reggy) -> Truss(x, sharia))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, sharia) and Truss(sharia, reggy) -> Presuppose(x, sharia))\nforall x (Refreshen(x, sharia) -> Unbiased(sharia))\nforall x (Presuppose(x, sharia) and Truss(sharia, reggy) -> Refreshen(x, urson))\nforall x (Truss(x, urson) -> Unbiased(urson))\nforall x (Truss(x, urson) -> Refreshen(x, sharia))\n\nPresuppose(reggy, urson)\n\nPresuppose(reggy, urson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The hillel dinge the allyson. The hillel dinge the evanne. The allyson is homophobic. The allyson budget the hillel. The allyson budget the evanne. The allyson dinge the evanne. The allyson cower the evanne. The evanne is sick. The evanne budget the hillel. The evanne dinge the hillel. If someone budget the evanne then they like the allyson. If someone dinge the allyson and the allyson budget the evanne then they visit the allyson. If someone dinge the allyson then the allyson is homophobic. If someone cower the allyson and the allyson budget the evanne then they need the hillel. If someone budget the hillel then the hillel is homophobic. If someone budget the hillel then they need the allyson. The evanne is not homophobic.", "logic": "\nDinge(hillel, allyson)\nDinge(hillel, evanne)\nHomophobic(allyson)\nBudget(allyson, hillel)\nBudget(allyson, evanne)\nDinge(allyson, evanne)\nCower(allyson, evanne)\nSick(evanne)\nBudget(evanne, hillel)\nDinge(evanne, hillel)\nforall x (Budget(x, evanne) -> Budget(x, allyson))\nforall x (Dinge(x, allyson) and Budget(allyson, evanne) -> Cower(x, allyson))\nforall x (Dinge(x, allyson) -> Homophobic(allyson))\nforall x (Cower(x, allyson) and Budget(allyson, evanne) -> Dinge(x, hillel))\nforall x (Budget(x, hillel) -> Homophobic(hillel))\nforall x (Budget(x, hillel) -> Dinge(x, allyson))\n\nnot Homophobic(evanne)\n\nnot Homophobic(evanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The steve blaspheme the evvy. The steve blaspheme the skipper. The evvy is unswerving. The evvy bitch the steve. The evvy bitch the skipper. The evvy blaspheme the skipper. The evvy balkanize the skipper. The skipper is brilliant. The skipper bitch the steve. The skipper blaspheme the steve. If someone bitch the skipper then they like the evvy. If someone blaspheme the evvy and the evvy bitch the skipper then they visit the evvy. If someone blaspheme the evvy then the evvy is unswerving. If someone balkanize the evvy and the evvy bitch the skipper then they need the steve. If someone bitch the steve then the steve is unswerving. If someone bitch the steve then they need the evvy. The evvy balkanize the steve.", "logic": "\nBlaspheme(steve, evvy)\nBlaspheme(steve, skipper)\nUnswerving(evvy)\nBitch(evvy, steve)\nBitch(evvy, skipper)\nBlaspheme(evvy, skipper)\nBalkanize(evvy, skipper)\nBrilliant(skipper)\nBitch(skipper, steve)\nBlaspheme(skipper, steve)\nforall x (Bitch(x, skipper) -> Bitch(x, evvy))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, evvy) and Bitch(evvy, skipper) -> Balkanize(x, evvy))\nforall x (Blaspheme(x, evvy) -> Unswerving(evvy))\nforall x (Balkanize(x, evvy) and Bitch(evvy, skipper) -> Blaspheme(x, steve))\nforall x (Bitch(x, steve) -> Unswerving(steve))\nforall x (Bitch(x, steve) -> Blaspheme(x, evvy))\n\nBalkanize(evvy, steve)\n\nBalkanize(evvy, steve) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The aeriel craze the will. The aeriel craze the emory. The will is infallible. The will twaddle the aeriel. The will twaddle the emory. The will craze the emory. The will alkalinise the emory. The emory is neuronic. The emory twaddle the aeriel. The emory craze the aeriel. If someone twaddle the emory then they like the will. If someone craze the will and the will twaddle the emory then they visit the will. If someone craze the will then the will is infallible. If someone alkalinise the will and the will twaddle the emory then they need the aeriel. If someone twaddle the aeriel then the aeriel is infallible. If someone twaddle the aeriel then they need the will. The will is not neuronic.", "logic": "\nCraze(aeriel, will)\nCraze(aeriel, emory)\nInfallible(will)\nTwaddle(will, aeriel)\nTwaddle(will, emory)\nCraze(will, emory)\nAlkalinise(will, emory)\nNeuronic(emory)\nTwaddle(emory, aeriel)\nCraze(emory, aeriel)\nforall x (Twaddle(x, emory) -> Twaddle(x, will))\nforall x (Craze(x, will) and Twaddle(will, emory) -> Alkalinise(x, will))\nforall x (Craze(x, will) -> Infallible(will))\nforall x (Alkalinise(x, will) and Twaddle(will, emory) -> Craze(x, aeriel))\nforall x (Twaddle(x, aeriel) -> Infallible(aeriel))\nforall x (Twaddle(x, aeriel) -> Craze(x, will))\n\nnot Neuronic(will)\n\nnot Neuronic(will) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "The honor quench the caresse. The honor quench the chelsae. The caresse is recorded. The caresse clutter the honor. The caresse clutter the chelsae. The caresse quench the chelsae. The caresse clop the chelsae. The chelsae is jumentous. The chelsae clutter the honor. The chelsae quench the honor. If someone clutter the chelsae then they like the caresse. If someone quench the caresse and the caresse clutter the chelsae then they visit the caresse. If someone quench the caresse then the caresse is recorded. If someone clop the caresse and the caresse clutter the chelsae then they need the honor. If someone clutter the honor then the honor is recorded. If someone clutter the honor then they need the caresse. The caresse is nice.", "logic": "\nQuench(honor, caresse)\nQuench(honor, chelsae)\nRecorded(caresse)\nClutter(caresse, honor)\nClutter(caresse, chelsae)\nQuench(caresse, chelsae)\nClop(caresse, chelsae)\nJumentous(chelsae)\nClutter(chelsae, honor)\nQuench(chelsae, honor)\nforall x (Clutter(x, chelsae) -> Clutter(x, caresse))\nforall x (Quench(x, caresse) and Clutter(caresse, chelsae) -> Clop(x, caresse))\nforall x (Quench(x, caresse) -> Recorded(caresse))\nforall x (Clop(x, caresse) and Clutter(caresse, chelsae) -> Quench(x, honor))\nforall x (Clutter(x, honor) -> Recorded(honor))\nforall x (Clutter(x, honor) -> Quench(x, caresse))\n\nNice(caresse)\n\nNice(caresse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1372"} {"premises": "Annabel is knockdown. Shawn is coarsened. Sibyl is not assonant. If Annabel is coarsened and Annabel is not presto then Annabel is glittery. If someone is knockdown then they are not assonant. Sibyl is not assonant.", "logic": "\nKnockdown(annabel)\nCoarsened(shawn)\nnot Assonant(sibyl)\nCoarsened(annabel) and not Presto(annabel) -> Glittery(annabel)\nforall x (Knockdown(x) -> not Assonant(x))\n\nnot Assonant(sibyl)\n\ntherefore not Assonant(sibyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5859"} {"premises": "Raynard is subocular. Yacov is effected. Benni is not unhygienic. If Raynard is effected and Raynard is not scurrilous then Raynard is idolised. If someone is subocular then they are not unhygienic. Raynard is not subocular.", "logic": "\nSubocular(raynard)\nEffected(yacov)\nnot Unhygienic(benni)\nEffected(raynard) and not Scurrilous(raynard) -> Idolised(raynard)\nforall x (Subocular(x) -> not Unhygienic(x))\n\nnot Subocular(raynard)\n\ntherefore Subocular(raynard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5859"} {"premises": "Sibeal is farming. Florella is fitted. Lorine is not romanian. If Sibeal is fitted and Sibeal is not hyaline then Sibeal is azonic. If someone is farming then they are not romanian. Sibeal is not azonic.", "logic": "\nFarming(sibeal)\nFitted(florella)\nnot Romanian(lorine)\nFitted(sibeal) and not Hyaline(sibeal) -> Azonic(sibeal)\nforall x (Farming(x) -> not Romanian(x))\n\nnot Azonic(sibeal)\n\nFitted(sibeal) and not Hyaline(sibeal) -> Azonic(sibeal) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5859"} {"premises": "Tabbi is dwindling. Zeke is agnatic. Wallis is not palliative. If Tabbi is agnatic and Tabbi is not christly then Tabbi is humourous. If someone is dwindling then they are not palliative. Zeke is christly.", "logic": "\nDwindling(tabbi)\nAgnatic(zeke)\nnot Palliative(wallis)\nAgnatic(tabbi) and not Christly(tabbi) -> Humourous(tabbi)\nforall x (Dwindling(x) -> not Palliative(x))\n\nChristly(zeke)\n\nChristly(zeke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5859"} {"premises": "The camila chitter the athene. The aamir is swooning. The athene is not accurate. If something is closed then it does not chase the camila. If something chitter the athene and it chitter the aamir then the athene is not cheery. If something is cheery then it chitter the aamir. If something introvert the aamir then the aamir is cheery. If something is swooning then it introvert the aamir. If the camila chitter the aamir and the camila does not like the aamir then the aamir garnish the camila. The athene is not accurate.", "logic": "\nChitter(camila, athene)\nSwooning(aamir)\nnot Accurate(athene)\nforall x (Closed(x) -> not Garnish(x, camila))\nforall x (Chitter(x, athene) and Chitter(x, aamir) -> not Cheery(athene))\nforall x (Cheery(x) -> Chitter(x, aamir))\nforall x (Introvert(x, aamir) -> Cheery(aamir))\nforall x (Swooning(x) -> Introvert(x, aamir))\nChitter(camila, aamir) and not Introvert(camila, aamir) -> Garnish(aamir, camila)\n\nnot Accurate(athene)\n\ntherefore not Accurate(athene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The thom slither the gwynne. The jeffie is urgent. The gwynne is not panicky. If something is partizan then it does not chase the thom. If something slither the gwynne and it slither the jeffie then the gwynne is not malleable. If something is malleable then it slither the jeffie. If something earmark the jeffie then the jeffie is malleable. If something is urgent then it earmark the jeffie. If the thom slither the jeffie and the thom does not like the jeffie then the jeffie round the thom. The gwynne is panicky.", "logic": "\nSlither(thom, gwynne)\nUrgent(jeffie)\nnot Panicky(gwynne)\nforall x (Partizan(x) -> not Round(x, thom))\nforall x (Slither(x, gwynne) and Slither(x, jeffie) -> not Malleable(gwynne))\nforall x (Malleable(x) -> Slither(x, jeffie))\nforall x (Earmark(x, jeffie) -> Malleable(jeffie))\nforall x (Urgent(x) -> Earmark(x, jeffie))\nSlither(thom, jeffie) and not Earmark(thom, jeffie) -> Round(jeffie, thom)\n\nPanicky(gwynne)\n\ntherefore not Panicky(gwynne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The jae flinch the terrance. The arda is joined. The terrance is not skittish. If something is factorial then it does not chase the jae. If something flinch the terrance and it flinch the arda then the terrance is not inst. If something is inst then it flinch the arda. If something ambuscade the arda then the arda is inst. If something is joined then it ambuscade the arda. If the jae flinch the arda and the jae does not like the arda then the arda refurbish the jae. The arda ambuscade the arda.", "logic": "\nFlinch(jae, terrance)\nJoined(arda)\nnot Skittish(terrance)\nforall x (Factorial(x) -> not Refurbish(x, jae))\nforall x (Flinch(x, terrance) and Flinch(x, arda) -> not Inst(terrance))\nforall x (Inst(x) -> Flinch(x, arda))\nforall x (Ambuscade(x, arda) -> Inst(arda))\nforall x (Joined(x) -> Ambuscade(x, arda))\nFlinch(jae, arda) and not Ambuscade(jae, arda) -> Refurbish(arda, jae)\n\nAmbuscade(arda, arda)\n\nJoined(arda) and forall x (Joined(x) -> Ambuscade(x, arda)) -> therefore Ambuscade(arda, arda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The christin dismay the baily. The tatiania is glutinous. The baily is not surficial. If something is bobtailed then it does not chase the christin. If something dismay the baily and it dismay the tatiania then the baily is not left. If something is left then it dismay the tatiania. If something follow the tatiania then the tatiania is left. If something is glutinous then it follow the tatiania. If the christin dismay the tatiania and the christin does not like the tatiania then the tatiania detrain the christin. The tatiania does not like the tatiania.", "logic": "\nDismay(christin, baily)\nGlutinous(tatiania)\nnot Surficial(baily)\nforall x (Bobtailed(x) -> not Detrain(x, christin))\nforall x (Dismay(x, baily) and Dismay(x, tatiania) -> not Left(baily))\nforall x (Left(x) -> Dismay(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Follow(x, tatiania) -> Left(tatiania))\nforall x (Glutinous(x) -> Follow(x, tatiania))\nDismay(christin, tatiania) and not Follow(christin, tatiania) -> Detrain(tatiania, christin)\n\nnot Follow(tatiania, tatiania)\n\nGlutinous(tatiania) and forall x (Glutinous(x) -> Follow(x, tatiania)) -> therefore Follow(tatiania, tatiania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The sergei striate the torr. The malka is balmy. The torr is not headlong. If something is dormie then it does not chase the sergei. If something striate the torr and it striate the malka then the torr is not bovid. If something is bovid then it striate the malka. If something restore the malka then the malka is bovid. If something is balmy then it restore the malka. If the sergei striate the malka and the sergei does not like the malka then the malka sculpt the sergei. The malka is bovid.", "logic": "\nStriate(sergei, torr)\nBalmy(malka)\nnot Headlong(torr)\nforall x (Dormie(x) -> not Sculpt(x, sergei))\nforall x (Striate(x, torr) and Striate(x, malka) -> not Bovid(torr))\nforall x (Bovid(x) -> Striate(x, malka))\nforall x (Restore(x, malka) -> Bovid(malka))\nforall x (Balmy(x) -> Restore(x, malka))\nStriate(sergei, malka) and not Restore(sergei, malka) -> Sculpt(malka, sergei)\n\nBovid(malka)\n\nBalmy(malka) and forall x (Balmy(x) -> Restore(x, malka)) -> therefore Restore(malka, malka) Restore(malka, malka) and forall x (Restore(x, malka) -> Bovid(malka)) -> therefore Bovid(malka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The reeta whisker the thain. The verile is inboard. The thain is not outclassed. If something is polyploid then it does not chase the reeta. If something whisker the thain and it whisker the verile then the thain is not clinched. If something is clinched then it whisker the verile. If something bevel the verile then the verile is clinched. If something is inboard then it bevel the verile. If the reeta whisker the verile and the reeta does not like the verile then the verile glissade the reeta. The verile is not clinched.", "logic": "\nWhisker(reeta, thain)\nInboard(verile)\nnot Outclassed(thain)\nforall x (Polyploid(x) -> not Glissade(x, reeta))\nforall x (Whisker(x, thain) and Whisker(x, verile) -> not Clinched(thain))\nforall x (Clinched(x) -> Whisker(x, verile))\nforall x (Bevel(x, verile) -> Clinched(verile))\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> Bevel(x, verile))\nWhisker(reeta, verile) and not Bevel(reeta, verile) -> Glissade(verile, reeta)\n\nnot Clinched(verile)\n\nInboard(verile) and forall x (Inboard(x) -> Bevel(x, verile)) -> therefore Bevel(verile, verile) Bevel(verile, verile) and forall x (Bevel(x, verile) -> Clinched(verile)) -> therefore Clinched(verile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The dominic squirm the cybil. The len is stabile. The cybil is not aerolitic. If something is embolic then it does not chase the dominic. If something squirm the cybil and it squirm the len then the cybil is not fictile. If something is fictile then it squirm the len. If something melanize the len then the len is fictile. If something is stabile then it melanize the len. If the dominic squirm the len and the dominic does not like the len then the len occupy the dominic. The len squirm the len.", "logic": "\nSquirm(dominic, cybil)\nStabile(len)\nnot Aerolitic(cybil)\nforall x (Embolic(x) -> not Occupy(x, dominic))\nforall x (Squirm(x, cybil) and Squirm(x, len) -> not Fictile(cybil))\nforall x (Fictile(x) -> Squirm(x, len))\nforall x (Melanize(x, len) -> Fictile(len))\nforall x (Stabile(x) -> Melanize(x, len))\nSquirm(dominic, len) and not Melanize(dominic, len) -> Occupy(len, dominic)\n\nSquirm(len, len)\n\nStabile(len) and forall x (Stabile(x) -> Melanize(x, len)) -> therefore Melanize(len, len) Melanize(len, len) and forall x (Melanize(x, len) -> Fictile(len)) -> therefore Fictile(len) Fictile(len) and forall x (Fictile(x) -> Squirm(x, len)) -> therefore Squirm(len, len)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The antonella ranch the fionna. The clive is akin. The fionna is not pursuant. If something is alcoholic then it does not chase the antonella. If something ranch the fionna and it ranch the clive then the fionna is not racking. If something is racking then it ranch the clive. If something levy the clive then the clive is racking. If something is akin then it levy the clive. If the antonella ranch the clive and the antonella does not like the clive then the clive scuttle the antonella. The clive does not see the clive.", "logic": "\nRanch(antonella, fionna)\nAkin(clive)\nnot Pursuant(fionna)\nforall x (Alcoholic(x) -> not Scuttle(x, antonella))\nforall x (Ranch(x, fionna) and Ranch(x, clive) -> not Racking(fionna))\nforall x (Racking(x) -> Ranch(x, clive))\nforall x (Levy(x, clive) -> Racking(clive))\nforall x (Akin(x) -> Levy(x, clive))\nRanch(antonella, clive) and not Levy(antonella, clive) -> Scuttle(clive, antonella)\n\nnot Ranch(clive, clive)\n\nAkin(clive) and forall x (Akin(x) -> Levy(x, clive)) -> therefore Levy(clive, clive) Levy(clive, clive) and forall x (Levy(x, clive) -> Racking(clive)) -> therefore Racking(clive) Racking(clive) and forall x (Racking(x) -> Ranch(x, clive)) -> therefore Ranch(clive, clive)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The sean acquire the talbot. The krissie is shuttered. The talbot is not roughish. If something is freehanded then it does not chase the sean. If something acquire the talbot and it acquire the krissie then the talbot is not barebacked. If something is barebacked then it acquire the krissie. If something verdigris the krissie then the krissie is barebacked. If something is shuttered then it verdigris the krissie. If the sean acquire the krissie and the sean does not like the krissie then the krissie rock the sean. The talbot does not like the krissie.", "logic": "\nAcquire(sean, talbot)\nShuttered(krissie)\nnot Roughish(talbot)\nforall x (Freehanded(x) -> not Rock(x, sean))\nforall x (Acquire(x, talbot) and Acquire(x, krissie) -> not Barebacked(talbot))\nforall x (Barebacked(x) -> Acquire(x, krissie))\nforall x (Verdigris(x, krissie) -> Barebacked(krissie))\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Verdigris(x, krissie))\nAcquire(sean, krissie) and not Verdigris(sean, krissie) -> Rock(krissie, sean)\n\nnot Verdigris(talbot, krissie)\n\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Verdigris(x, krissie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The winonah abort the amelie. The natty is glassed. The amelie is not bacchantic. If something is reversive then it does not chase the winonah. If something abort the amelie and it abort the natty then the amelie is not mental. If something is mental then it abort the natty. If something reference the natty then the natty is mental. If something is glassed then it reference the natty. If the winonah abort the natty and the winonah does not like the natty then the natty house the winonah. The natty house the winonah.", "logic": "\nAbort(winonah, amelie)\nGlassed(natty)\nnot Bacchantic(amelie)\nforall x (Reversive(x) -> not House(x, winonah))\nforall x (Abort(x, amelie) and Abort(x, natty) -> not Mental(amelie))\nforall x (Mental(x) -> Abort(x, natty))\nforall x (Reference(x, natty) -> Mental(natty))\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Reference(x, natty))\nAbort(winonah, natty) and not Reference(winonah, natty) -> House(natty, winonah)\n\nHouse(natty, winonah)\n\nAbort(winonah, natty) and not Reference(winonah, natty) -> House(natty, winonah) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The zorro churn the tuckie. The rani is haemic. The tuckie is not abient. If something is infirm then it does not chase the zorro. If something churn the tuckie and it churn the rani then the tuckie is not blanketed. If something is blanketed then it churn the rani. If something strangle the rani then the rani is blanketed. If something is haemic then it strangle the rani. If the zorro churn the rani and the zorro does not like the rani then the rani polymerize the zorro. The zorro does not like the rani.", "logic": "\nChurn(zorro, tuckie)\nHaemic(rani)\nnot Abient(tuckie)\nforall x (Infirm(x) -> not Polymerize(x, zorro))\nforall x (Churn(x, tuckie) and Churn(x, rani) -> not Blanketed(tuckie))\nforall x (Blanketed(x) -> Churn(x, rani))\nforall x (Strangle(x, rani) -> Blanketed(rani))\nforall x (Haemic(x) -> Strangle(x, rani))\nChurn(zorro, rani) and not Strangle(zorro, rani) -> Polymerize(rani, zorro)\n\nnot Strangle(zorro, rani)\n\nforall x (Haemic(x) -> Strangle(x, rani)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The nona buzz the sherwood. The basia is attempted. The sherwood is not hexed. If something is delphic then it does not chase the nona. If something buzz the sherwood and it buzz the basia then the sherwood is not malayan. If something is malayan then it buzz the basia. If something gown the basia then the basia is malayan. If something is attempted then it gown the basia. If the nona buzz the basia and the nona does not like the basia then the basia preoccupy the nona. The nona buzz the basia.", "logic": "\nBuzz(nona, sherwood)\nAttempted(basia)\nnot Hexed(sherwood)\nforall x (Delphic(x) -> not Preoccupy(x, nona))\nforall x (Buzz(x, sherwood) and Buzz(x, basia) -> not Malayan(sherwood))\nforall x (Malayan(x) -> Buzz(x, basia))\nforall x (Gown(x, basia) -> Malayan(basia))\nforall x (Attempted(x) -> Gown(x, basia))\nBuzz(nona, basia) and not Gown(nona, basia) -> Preoccupy(basia, nona)\n\nBuzz(nona, basia)\n\nforall x (Malayan(x) -> Buzz(x, basia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The audra attire the vinita. The brandise is sticky. The vinita is not painterly. If something is molten then it does not chase the audra. If something attire the vinita and it attire the brandise then the vinita is not domestic. If something is domestic then it attire the brandise. If something overflow the brandise then the brandise is domestic. If something is sticky then it overflow the brandise. If the audra attire the brandise and the audra does not like the brandise then the brandise will the audra. The brandise does not see the audra.", "logic": "\nAttire(audra, vinita)\nSticky(brandise)\nnot Painterly(vinita)\nforall x (Molten(x) -> not Will(x, audra))\nforall x (Attire(x, vinita) and Attire(x, brandise) -> not Domestic(vinita))\nforall x (Domestic(x) -> Attire(x, brandise))\nforall x (Overflow(x, brandise) -> Domestic(brandise))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> Overflow(x, brandise))\nAttire(audra, brandise) and not Overflow(audra, brandise) -> Will(brandise, audra)\n\nnot Attire(brandise, audra)\n\nnot Attire(brandise, audra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The sylvie radicalize the bambie. The maxfield is chainlike. The bambie is not statute. If something is riddled then it does not chase the sylvie. If something radicalize the bambie and it radicalize the maxfield then the bambie is not argentine. If something is argentine then it radicalize the maxfield. If something kidnap the maxfield then the maxfield is argentine. If something is chainlike then it kidnap the maxfield. If the sylvie radicalize the maxfield and the sylvie does not like the maxfield then the maxfield sleuth the sylvie. The bambie kidnap the sylvie.", "logic": "\nRadicalize(sylvie, bambie)\nChainlike(maxfield)\nnot Statute(bambie)\nforall x (Riddled(x) -> not Sleuth(x, sylvie))\nforall x (Radicalize(x, bambie) and Radicalize(x, maxfield) -> not Argentine(bambie))\nforall x (Argentine(x) -> Radicalize(x, maxfield))\nforall x (Kidnap(x, maxfield) -> Argentine(maxfield))\nforall x (Chainlike(x) -> Kidnap(x, maxfield))\nRadicalize(sylvie, maxfield) and not Kidnap(sylvie, maxfield) -> Sleuth(maxfield, sylvie)\n\nKidnap(bambie, sylvie)\n\nKidnap(bambie, sylvie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The laney wince the merci. The morgen is sentient. The merci is not furrowed. If something is condign then it does not chase the laney. If something wince the merci and it wince the morgen then the merci is not panoplied. If something is panoplied then it wince the morgen. If something enrage the morgen then the morgen is panoplied. If something is sentient then it enrage the morgen. If the laney wince the morgen and the laney does not like the morgen then the morgen murk the laney. The morgen is not condign.", "logic": "\nWince(laney, merci)\nSentient(morgen)\nnot Furrowed(merci)\nforall x (Condign(x) -> not Murk(x, laney))\nforall x (Wince(x, merci) and Wince(x, morgen) -> not Panoplied(merci))\nforall x (Panoplied(x) -> Wince(x, morgen))\nforall x (Enrage(x, morgen) -> Panoplied(morgen))\nforall x (Sentient(x) -> Enrage(x, morgen))\nWince(laney, morgen) and not Enrage(laney, morgen) -> Murk(morgen, laney)\n\nnot Condign(morgen)\n\nnot Condign(morgen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The thor compute the martainn. The prissie is busybodied. The martainn is not topless. If something is guatemalan then it does not chase the thor. If something compute the martainn and it compute the prissie then the martainn is not overblown. If something is overblown then it compute the prissie. If something preen the prissie then the prissie is overblown. If something is busybodied then it preen the prissie. If the thor compute the prissie and the thor does not like the prissie then the prissie tattoo the thor. The martainn is guatemalan.", "logic": "\nCompute(thor, martainn)\nBusybodied(prissie)\nnot Topless(martainn)\nforall x (Guatemalan(x) -> not Tattoo(x, thor))\nforall x (Compute(x, martainn) and Compute(x, prissie) -> not Overblown(martainn))\nforall x (Overblown(x) -> Compute(x, prissie))\nforall x (Preen(x, prissie) -> Overblown(prissie))\nforall x (Busybodied(x) -> Preen(x, prissie))\nCompute(thor, prissie) and not Preen(thor, prissie) -> Tattoo(prissie, thor)\n\nGuatemalan(martainn)\n\nGuatemalan(martainn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-333"} {"premises": "The kesley undergrow the gino. The kesley whirr the gino. The gino undergrow the kesley. The gino is unready. The gino is pearly. The gino inundate the kesley. The gino whirr the kesley. If someone undergrow the gino and the gino undergrow the kesley then they are beady. If someone whirr the kesley then they like the kesley. If someone inundate the kesley then they eat the kesley. The gino is unready.", "logic": "\nUndergrow(kesley, gino)\nWhirr(kesley, gino)\nUndergrow(gino, kesley)\nUnready(gino)\nPearly(gino)\nInundate(gino, kesley)\nWhirr(gino, kesley)\nforall x (Undergrow(x, gino) and Undergrow(gino, kesley) -> Beady(x))\nforall x (Whirr(x, kesley) -> Inundate(x, kesley))\nforall x (Inundate(x, kesley) -> Undergrow(x, kesley))\n\nUnready(gino)\n\ntherefore Unready(gino)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3163"} {"premises": "The percy disinherit the salvador. The percy detick the salvador. The salvador disinherit the percy. The salvador is impelled. The salvador is unifacial. The salvador ally the percy. The salvador detick the percy. If someone disinherit the salvador and the salvador disinherit the percy then they are amoebous. If someone detick the percy then they like the percy. If someone ally the percy then they eat the percy. The salvador is not unifacial.", "logic": "\nDisinherit(percy, salvador)\nDetick(percy, salvador)\nDisinherit(salvador, percy)\nImpelled(salvador)\nUnifacial(salvador)\nAlly(salvador, percy)\nDetick(salvador, percy)\nforall x (Disinherit(x, salvador) and Disinherit(salvador, percy) -> Amoebous(x))\nforall x (Detick(x, percy) -> Ally(x, percy))\nforall x (Ally(x, percy) -> Disinherit(x, percy))\n\nnot Unifacial(salvador)\n\ntherefore Unifacial(salvador)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3163"} {"premises": "The olimpia metrify the pansy. The olimpia depreciate the pansy. The pansy metrify the olimpia. The pansy is cattish. The pansy is calycular. The pansy suppurate the olimpia. The pansy depreciate the olimpia. If someone metrify the pansy and the pansy metrify the olimpia then they are mycenaean. If someone depreciate the olimpia then they like the olimpia. If someone suppurate the olimpia then they eat the olimpia. The olimpia does not eat the olimpia.", "logic": "\nMetrify(olimpia, pansy)\nDepreciate(olimpia, pansy)\nMetrify(pansy, olimpia)\nCattish(pansy)\nCalycular(pansy)\nSuppurate(pansy, olimpia)\nDepreciate(pansy, olimpia)\nforall x (Metrify(x, pansy) and Metrify(pansy, olimpia) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Depreciate(x, olimpia) -> Suppurate(x, olimpia))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, olimpia) -> Metrify(x, olimpia))\n\nnot Metrify(olimpia, olimpia)\n\nforall x (Suppurate(x, olimpia) -> Metrify(x, olimpia)) <- forall x (Depreciate(x, olimpia) -> Suppurate(x, olimpia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3163"} {"premises": "The elsie emplace the shepperd. The elsie implicate the shepperd. The shepperd emplace the elsie. The shepperd is adipose. The shepperd is hydrous. The shepperd preexist the elsie. The shepperd implicate the elsie. If someone emplace the shepperd and the shepperd emplace the elsie then they are echoless. If someone implicate the elsie then they like the elsie. If someone preexist the elsie then they eat the elsie. The elsie is hydrous.", "logic": "\nEmplace(elsie, shepperd)\nImplicate(elsie, shepperd)\nEmplace(shepperd, elsie)\nAdipose(shepperd)\nHydrous(shepperd)\nPreexist(shepperd, elsie)\nImplicate(shepperd, elsie)\nforall x (Emplace(x, shepperd) and Emplace(shepperd, elsie) -> Echoless(x))\nforall x (Implicate(x, elsie) -> Preexist(x, elsie))\nforall x (Preexist(x, elsie) -> Emplace(x, elsie))\n\nHydrous(elsie)\n\nHydrous(elsie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3163"} {"premises": "The merilee is lidless. The merilee careen the paton. The parke financier the paton. The parke careen the merilee. The paton does not chase the merilee. The paton improve the parke. The paton does not eat the merilee. The paton is not scalene. The paton is lidless. The paton is frontmost. If something careen the paton and it financier the paton then the paton improve the parke. If the merilee improve the parke then the merilee careen the paton. All frontmost things are tomentous. If something is tomentous and frontmost then it does not like the parke. If something improve the paton then it does not chase the parke. If the parke does not like the merilee then the parke is somnific. If something careen the parke then the parke improve the paton. If something is frontmost and it does not like the parke then the parke is scalene. The merilee careen the paton.", "logic": "\nLidless(merilee)\nCareen(merilee, paton)\nFinancier(parke, paton)\nCareen(parke, merilee)\nnot Improve(paton, merilee)\nImprove(paton, parke)\nnot Financier(paton, merilee)\nnot Scalene(paton)\nLidless(paton)\nFrontmost(paton)\nforall x (Careen(x, paton) and Financier(x, paton) -> Improve(paton, parke))\nImprove(merilee, parke) -> Careen(merilee, paton)\nforall x (Frontmost(x) -> Tomentous(x))\nforall x (Tomentous(x) and Frontmost(x) -> not Careen(x, parke))\nforall x (Improve(x, paton) -> not Improve(x, parke))\nnot Careen(parke, merilee) -> Somnific(parke)\nforall x (Careen(x, parke) -> Improve(parke, paton))\nforall x (Frontmost(x) and not Careen(x, parke) -> Scalene(parke))\n\nCareen(merilee, paton)\n\ntherefore Careen(merilee, paton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The aeriel is dedicated. The aeriel ting the revkah. The felicia relish the revkah. The felicia ting the aeriel. The revkah does not chase the aeriel. The revkah flutter the felicia. The revkah does not eat the aeriel. The revkah is not opening. The revkah is dedicated. The revkah is saclike. If something ting the revkah and it relish the revkah then the revkah flutter the felicia. If the aeriel flutter the felicia then the aeriel ting the revkah. All saclike things are norman. If something is norman and saclike then it does not like the felicia. If something flutter the revkah then it does not chase the felicia. If the felicia does not like the aeriel then the felicia is mirrorlike. If something ting the felicia then the felicia flutter the revkah. If something is saclike and it does not like the felicia then the felicia is opening. The revkah relish the aeriel.", "logic": "\nDedicated(aeriel)\nTing(aeriel, revkah)\nRelish(felicia, revkah)\nTing(felicia, aeriel)\nnot Flutter(revkah, aeriel)\nFlutter(revkah, felicia)\nnot Relish(revkah, aeriel)\nnot Opening(revkah)\nDedicated(revkah)\nSaclike(revkah)\nforall x (Ting(x, revkah) and Relish(x, revkah) -> Flutter(revkah, felicia))\nFlutter(aeriel, felicia) -> Ting(aeriel, revkah)\nforall x (Saclike(x) -> Norman(x))\nforall x (Norman(x) and Saclike(x) -> not Ting(x, felicia))\nforall x (Flutter(x, revkah) -> not Flutter(x, felicia))\nnot Ting(felicia, aeriel) -> Mirrorlike(felicia)\nforall x (Ting(x, felicia) -> Flutter(felicia, revkah))\nforall x (Saclike(x) and not Ting(x, felicia) -> Opening(felicia))\n\nRelish(revkah, aeriel)\n\ntherefore not Relish(revkah, aeriel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The leiah is spirited. The leiah depilate the thaddeus. The berna mouth the thaddeus. The berna depilate the leiah. The thaddeus does not chase the leiah. The thaddeus potter the berna. The thaddeus does not eat the leiah. The thaddeus is not thwarting. The thaddeus is spirited. The thaddeus is forceful. If something depilate the thaddeus and it mouth the thaddeus then the thaddeus potter the berna. If the leiah potter the berna then the leiah depilate the thaddeus. All forceful things are spouting. If something is spouting and forceful then it does not like the berna. If something potter the thaddeus then it does not chase the berna. If the berna does not like the leiah then the berna is disquieted. If something depilate the berna then the berna potter the thaddeus. If something is forceful and it does not like the berna then the berna is thwarting. The thaddeus is spouting.", "logic": "\nSpirited(leiah)\nDepilate(leiah, thaddeus)\nMouth(berna, thaddeus)\nDepilate(berna, leiah)\nnot Potter(thaddeus, leiah)\nPotter(thaddeus, berna)\nnot Mouth(thaddeus, leiah)\nnot Thwarting(thaddeus)\nSpirited(thaddeus)\nForceful(thaddeus)\nforall x (Depilate(x, thaddeus) and Mouth(x, thaddeus) -> Potter(thaddeus, berna))\nPotter(leiah, berna) -> Depilate(leiah, thaddeus)\nforall x (Forceful(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) and Forceful(x) -> not Depilate(x, berna))\nforall x (Potter(x, thaddeus) -> not Potter(x, berna))\nnot Depilate(berna, leiah) -> Disquieted(berna)\nforall x (Depilate(x, berna) -> Potter(berna, thaddeus))\nforall x (Forceful(x) and not Depilate(x, berna) -> Thwarting(berna))\n\nSpouting(thaddeus)\n\nForceful(thaddeus) and forall x (Forceful(x) -> Spouting(x)) -> therefore Spouting(thaddeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The carmita is starved. The carmita catch the daisy. The smitty arch the daisy. The smitty catch the carmita. The daisy does not chase the carmita. The daisy bewail the smitty. The daisy does not eat the carmita. The daisy is not rare. The daisy is starved. The daisy is whimsical. If something catch the daisy and it arch the daisy then the daisy bewail the smitty. If the carmita bewail the smitty then the carmita catch the daisy. All whimsical things are jolly. If something is jolly and whimsical then it does not like the smitty. If something bewail the daisy then it does not chase the smitty. If the smitty does not like the carmita then the smitty is rhyming. If something catch the smitty then the smitty bewail the daisy. If something is whimsical and it does not like the smitty then the smitty is rare. The daisy is not jolly.", "logic": "\nStarved(carmita)\nCatch(carmita, daisy)\nArch(smitty, daisy)\nCatch(smitty, carmita)\nnot Bewail(daisy, carmita)\nBewail(daisy, smitty)\nnot Arch(daisy, carmita)\nnot Rare(daisy)\nStarved(daisy)\nWhimsical(daisy)\nforall x (Catch(x, daisy) and Arch(x, daisy) -> Bewail(daisy, smitty))\nBewail(carmita, smitty) -> Catch(carmita, daisy)\nforall x (Whimsical(x) -> Jolly(x))\nforall x (Jolly(x) and Whimsical(x) -> not Catch(x, smitty))\nforall x (Bewail(x, daisy) -> not Bewail(x, smitty))\nnot Catch(smitty, carmita) -> Rhyming(smitty)\nforall x (Catch(x, smitty) -> Bewail(smitty, daisy))\nforall x (Whimsical(x) and not Catch(x, smitty) -> Rare(smitty))\n\nnot Jolly(daisy)\n\nWhimsical(daisy) and forall x (Whimsical(x) -> Jolly(x)) -> therefore Jolly(daisy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The elton is assailable. The elton slenderize the randene. The kacie misally the randene. The kacie slenderize the elton. The randene does not chase the elton. The randene lobby the kacie. The randene does not eat the elton. The randene is not assured. The randene is assailable. The randene is nappy. If something slenderize the randene and it misally the randene then the randene lobby the kacie. If the elton lobby the kacie then the elton slenderize the randene. All nappy things are probatory. If something is probatory and nappy then it does not like the kacie. If something lobby the randene then it does not chase the kacie. If the kacie does not like the elton then the kacie is azotic. If something slenderize the kacie then the kacie lobby the randene. If something is nappy and it does not like the kacie then the kacie is assured. The randene does not like the kacie.", "logic": "\nAssailable(elton)\nSlenderize(elton, randene)\nMisally(kacie, randene)\nSlenderize(kacie, elton)\nnot Lobby(randene, elton)\nLobby(randene, kacie)\nnot Misally(randene, elton)\nnot Assured(randene)\nAssailable(randene)\nNappy(randene)\nforall x (Slenderize(x, randene) and Misally(x, randene) -> Lobby(randene, kacie))\nLobby(elton, kacie) -> Slenderize(elton, randene)\nforall x (Nappy(x) -> Probatory(x))\nforall x (Probatory(x) and Nappy(x) -> not Slenderize(x, kacie))\nforall x (Lobby(x, randene) -> not Lobby(x, kacie))\nnot Slenderize(kacie, elton) -> Azotic(kacie)\nforall x (Slenderize(x, kacie) -> Lobby(kacie, randene))\nforall x (Nappy(x) and not Slenderize(x, kacie) -> Assured(kacie))\n\nnot Slenderize(randene, kacie)\n\nNappy(randene) and forall x (Nappy(x) -> Probatory(x)) -> therefore Probatory(randene) Probatory(randene) and Nappy(randene) and forall x (Probatory(x) and Nappy(x) -> not Slenderize(x, kacie)) -> therefore not Slenderize(randene, kacie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The arabelle is befouled. The arabelle gage the elliot. The sonya thank the elliot. The sonya gage the arabelle. The elliot does not chase the arabelle. The elliot screen the sonya. The elliot does not eat the arabelle. The elliot is not idiomatic. The elliot is befouled. The elliot is decisive. If something gage the elliot and it thank the elliot then the elliot screen the sonya. If the arabelle screen the sonya then the arabelle gage the elliot. All decisive things are adulterine. If something is adulterine and decisive then it does not like the sonya. If something screen the elliot then it does not chase the sonya. If the sonya does not like the arabelle then the sonya is wraithlike. If something gage the sonya then the sonya screen the elliot. If something is decisive and it does not like the sonya then the sonya is idiomatic. The elliot gage the sonya.", "logic": "\nBefouled(arabelle)\nGage(arabelle, elliot)\nThank(sonya, elliot)\nGage(sonya, arabelle)\nnot Screen(elliot, arabelle)\nScreen(elliot, sonya)\nnot Thank(elliot, arabelle)\nnot Idiomatic(elliot)\nBefouled(elliot)\nDecisive(elliot)\nforall x (Gage(x, elliot) and Thank(x, elliot) -> Screen(elliot, sonya))\nScreen(arabelle, sonya) -> Gage(arabelle, elliot)\nforall x (Decisive(x) -> Adulterine(x))\nforall x (Adulterine(x) and Decisive(x) -> not Gage(x, sonya))\nforall x (Screen(x, elliot) -> not Screen(x, sonya))\nnot Gage(sonya, arabelle) -> Wraithlike(sonya)\nforall x (Gage(x, sonya) -> Screen(sonya, elliot))\nforall x (Decisive(x) and not Gage(x, sonya) -> Idiomatic(sonya))\n\nGage(elliot, sonya)\n\nDecisive(elliot) and forall x (Decisive(x) -> Adulterine(x)) -> therefore Adulterine(elliot) Adulterine(elliot) and Decisive(elliot) and forall x (Adulterine(x) and Decisive(x) -> not Gage(x, sonya)) -> therefore not Gage(elliot, sonya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The suki is periwigged. The suki ruddle the ole. The robenia narrow the ole. The robenia ruddle the suki. The ole does not chase the suki. The ole disinter the robenia. The ole does not eat the suki. The ole is not thawed. The ole is periwigged. The ole is increased. If something ruddle the ole and it narrow the ole then the ole disinter the robenia. If the suki disinter the robenia then the suki ruddle the ole. All increased things are tigerish. If something is tigerish and increased then it does not like the robenia. If something disinter the ole then it does not chase the robenia. If the robenia does not like the suki then the robenia is partible. If something ruddle the robenia then the robenia disinter the ole. If something is increased and it does not like the robenia then the robenia is thawed. The robenia is thawed.", "logic": "\nPeriwigged(suki)\nRuddle(suki, ole)\nNarrow(robenia, ole)\nRuddle(robenia, suki)\nnot Disinter(ole, suki)\nDisinter(ole, robenia)\nnot Narrow(ole, suki)\nnot Thawed(ole)\nPeriwigged(ole)\nIncreased(ole)\nforall x (Ruddle(x, ole) and Narrow(x, ole) -> Disinter(ole, robenia))\nDisinter(suki, robenia) -> Ruddle(suki, ole)\nforall x (Increased(x) -> Tigerish(x))\nforall x (Tigerish(x) and Increased(x) -> not Ruddle(x, robenia))\nforall x (Disinter(x, ole) -> not Disinter(x, robenia))\nnot Ruddle(robenia, suki) -> Partible(robenia)\nforall x (Ruddle(x, robenia) -> Disinter(robenia, ole))\nforall x (Increased(x) and not Ruddle(x, robenia) -> Thawed(robenia))\n\nThawed(robenia)\n\nIncreased(ole) and forall x (Increased(x) -> Tigerish(x)) -> therefore Tigerish(ole) Tigerish(ole) and Increased(ole) and forall x (Tigerish(x) and Increased(x) -> not Ruddle(x, robenia)) -> therefore not Ruddle(ole, robenia) Increased(ole) and not Ruddle(ole, robenia) and forall x (Increased(x) and not Ruddle(x, robenia) -> Thawed(robenia)) -> therefore Thawed(robenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The lisette is olympian. The lisette chip the linnet. The obadias disincline the linnet. The obadias chip the lisette. The linnet does not chase the lisette. The linnet balloon the obadias. The linnet does not eat the lisette. The linnet is not natural. The linnet is olympian. The linnet is olivelike. If something chip the linnet and it disincline the linnet then the linnet balloon the obadias. If the lisette balloon the obadias then the lisette chip the linnet. All olivelike things are pilous. If something is pilous and olivelike then it does not like the obadias. If something balloon the linnet then it does not chase the obadias. If the obadias does not like the lisette then the obadias is relaxing. If something chip the obadias then the obadias balloon the linnet. If something is olivelike and it does not like the obadias then the obadias is natural. The obadias is not natural.", "logic": "\nOlympian(lisette)\nChip(lisette, linnet)\nDisincline(obadias, linnet)\nChip(obadias, lisette)\nnot Balloon(linnet, lisette)\nBalloon(linnet, obadias)\nnot Disincline(linnet, lisette)\nnot Natural(linnet)\nOlympian(linnet)\nOlivelike(linnet)\nforall x (Chip(x, linnet) and Disincline(x, linnet) -> Balloon(linnet, obadias))\nBalloon(lisette, obadias) -> Chip(lisette, linnet)\nforall x (Olivelike(x) -> Pilous(x))\nforall x (Pilous(x) and Olivelike(x) -> not Chip(x, obadias))\nforall x (Balloon(x, linnet) -> not Balloon(x, obadias))\nnot Chip(obadias, lisette) -> Relaxing(obadias)\nforall x (Chip(x, obadias) -> Balloon(obadias, linnet))\nforall x (Olivelike(x) and not Chip(x, obadias) -> Natural(obadias))\n\nnot Natural(obadias)\n\nOlivelike(linnet) and forall x (Olivelike(x) -> Pilous(x)) -> therefore Pilous(linnet) Pilous(linnet) and Olivelike(linnet) and forall x (Pilous(x) and Olivelike(x) -> not Chip(x, obadias)) -> therefore not Chip(linnet, obadias) Olivelike(linnet) and not Chip(linnet, obadias) and forall x (Olivelike(x) and not Chip(x, obadias) -> Natural(obadias)) -> therefore Natural(obadias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The garth is turkish. The garth gentle the fleurette. The rosmunda untangle the fleurette. The rosmunda gentle the garth. The fleurette does not chase the garth. The fleurette endorse the rosmunda. The fleurette does not eat the garth. The fleurette is not hairlike. The fleurette is turkish. The fleurette is porous. If something gentle the fleurette and it untangle the fleurette then the fleurette endorse the rosmunda. If the garth endorse the rosmunda then the garth gentle the fleurette. All porous things are laureled. If something is laureled and porous then it does not like the rosmunda. If something endorse the fleurette then it does not chase the rosmunda. If the rosmunda does not like the garth then the rosmunda is unselected. If something gentle the rosmunda then the rosmunda endorse the fleurette. If something is porous and it does not like the rosmunda then the rosmunda is hairlike. The rosmunda is not laureled.", "logic": "\nTurkish(garth)\nGentle(garth, fleurette)\nUntangle(rosmunda, fleurette)\nGentle(rosmunda, garth)\nnot Endorse(fleurette, garth)\nEndorse(fleurette, rosmunda)\nnot Untangle(fleurette, garth)\nnot Hairlike(fleurette)\nTurkish(fleurette)\nPorous(fleurette)\nforall x (Gentle(x, fleurette) and Untangle(x, fleurette) -> Endorse(fleurette, rosmunda))\nEndorse(garth, rosmunda) -> Gentle(garth, fleurette)\nforall x (Porous(x) -> Laureled(x))\nforall x (Laureled(x) and Porous(x) -> not Gentle(x, rosmunda))\nforall x (Endorse(x, fleurette) -> not Endorse(x, rosmunda))\nnot Gentle(rosmunda, garth) -> Unselected(rosmunda)\nforall x (Gentle(x, rosmunda) -> Endorse(rosmunda, fleurette))\nforall x (Porous(x) and not Gentle(x, rosmunda) -> Hairlike(rosmunda))\n\nnot Laureled(rosmunda)\n\nforall x (Porous(x) -> Laureled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The tobiah is probative. The tobiah reassure the anabel. The darleen stumble the anabel. The darleen reassure the tobiah. The anabel does not chase the tobiah. The anabel despoil the darleen. The anabel does not eat the tobiah. The anabel is not rubbery. The anabel is probative. The anabel is sanguine. If something reassure the anabel and it stumble the anabel then the anabel despoil the darleen. If the tobiah despoil the darleen then the tobiah reassure the anabel. All sanguine things are mandean. If something is mandean and sanguine then it does not like the darleen. If something despoil the anabel then it does not chase the darleen. If the darleen does not like the tobiah then the darleen is motherlike. If something reassure the darleen then the darleen despoil the anabel. If something is sanguine and it does not like the darleen then the darleen is rubbery. The darleen is motherlike.", "logic": "\nProbative(tobiah)\nReassure(tobiah, anabel)\nStumble(darleen, anabel)\nReassure(darleen, tobiah)\nnot Despoil(anabel, tobiah)\nDespoil(anabel, darleen)\nnot Stumble(anabel, tobiah)\nnot Rubbery(anabel)\nProbative(anabel)\nSanguine(anabel)\nforall x (Reassure(x, anabel) and Stumble(x, anabel) -> Despoil(anabel, darleen))\nDespoil(tobiah, darleen) -> Reassure(tobiah, anabel)\nforall x (Sanguine(x) -> Mandean(x))\nforall x (Mandean(x) and Sanguine(x) -> not Reassure(x, darleen))\nforall x (Despoil(x, anabel) -> not Despoil(x, darleen))\nnot Reassure(darleen, tobiah) -> Motherlike(darleen)\nforall x (Reassure(x, darleen) -> Despoil(darleen, anabel))\nforall x (Sanguine(x) and not Reassure(x, darleen) -> Rubbery(darleen))\n\nMotherlike(darleen)\n\nnot Reassure(darleen, tobiah) -> Motherlike(darleen) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The gilli is nonionised. The gilli misdeliver the munroe. The lucinda enclothe the munroe. The lucinda misdeliver the gilli. The munroe does not chase the gilli. The munroe busy the lucinda. The munroe does not eat the gilli. The munroe is not unnatural. The munroe is nonionised. The munroe is oracular. If something misdeliver the munroe and it enclothe the munroe then the munroe busy the lucinda. If the gilli busy the lucinda then the gilli misdeliver the munroe. All oracular things are adaxial. If something is adaxial and oracular then it does not like the lucinda. If something busy the munroe then it does not chase the lucinda. If the lucinda does not like the gilli then the lucinda is baroque. If something misdeliver the lucinda then the lucinda busy the munroe. If something is oracular and it does not like the lucinda then the lucinda is unnatural. The gilli is not adaxial.", "logic": "\nNonionised(gilli)\nMisdeliver(gilli, munroe)\nEnclothe(lucinda, munroe)\nMisdeliver(lucinda, gilli)\nnot Busy(munroe, gilli)\nBusy(munroe, lucinda)\nnot Enclothe(munroe, gilli)\nnot Unnatural(munroe)\nNonionised(munroe)\nOracular(munroe)\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, munroe) and Enclothe(x, munroe) -> Busy(munroe, lucinda))\nBusy(gilli, lucinda) -> Misdeliver(gilli, munroe)\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Adaxial(x))\nforall x (Adaxial(x) and Oracular(x) -> not Misdeliver(x, lucinda))\nforall x (Busy(x, munroe) -> not Busy(x, lucinda))\nnot Misdeliver(lucinda, gilli) -> Baroque(lucinda)\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, lucinda) -> Busy(lucinda, munroe))\nforall x (Oracular(x) and not Misdeliver(x, lucinda) -> Unnatural(lucinda))\n\nnot Adaxial(gilli)\n\nforall x (Oracular(x) -> Adaxial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The wilton is fernless. The wilton sublease the gene. The rodi unbraid the gene. The rodi sublease the wilton. The gene does not chase the wilton. The gene fixate the rodi. The gene does not eat the wilton. The gene is not isothermal. The gene is fernless. The gene is lacklustre. If something sublease the gene and it unbraid the gene then the gene fixate the rodi. If the wilton fixate the rodi then the wilton sublease the gene. All lacklustre things are cleanable. If something is cleanable and lacklustre then it does not like the rodi. If something fixate the gene then it does not chase the rodi. If the rodi does not like the wilton then the rodi is pulmonic. If something sublease the rodi then the rodi fixate the gene. If something is lacklustre and it does not like the rodi then the rodi is isothermal. The rodi fixate the gene.", "logic": "\nFernless(wilton)\nSublease(wilton, gene)\nUnbraid(rodi, gene)\nSublease(rodi, wilton)\nnot Fixate(gene, wilton)\nFixate(gene, rodi)\nnot Unbraid(gene, wilton)\nnot Isothermal(gene)\nFernless(gene)\nLacklustre(gene)\nforall x (Sublease(x, gene) and Unbraid(x, gene) -> Fixate(gene, rodi))\nFixate(wilton, rodi) -> Sublease(wilton, gene)\nforall x (Lacklustre(x) -> Cleanable(x))\nforall x (Cleanable(x) and Lacklustre(x) -> not Sublease(x, rodi))\nforall x (Fixate(x, gene) -> not Fixate(x, rodi))\nnot Sublease(rodi, wilton) -> Pulmonic(rodi)\nforall x (Sublease(x, rodi) -> Fixate(rodi, gene))\nforall x (Lacklustre(x) and not Sublease(x, rodi) -> Isothermal(rodi))\n\nFixate(rodi, gene)\n\nforall x (Sublease(x, rodi) -> Fixate(rodi, gene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The aleece is chirpy. The aleece humidify the ranice. The shelton manure the ranice. The shelton humidify the aleece. The ranice does not chase the aleece. The ranice swill the shelton. The ranice does not eat the aleece. The ranice is not associate. The ranice is chirpy. The ranice is reedy. If something humidify the ranice and it manure the ranice then the ranice swill the shelton. If the aleece swill the shelton then the aleece humidify the ranice. All reedy things are smiling. If something is smiling and reedy then it does not like the shelton. If something swill the ranice then it does not chase the shelton. If the shelton does not like the aleece then the shelton is riotous. If something humidify the shelton then the shelton swill the ranice. If something is reedy and it does not like the shelton then the shelton is associate. The shelton is not reedy.", "logic": "\nChirpy(aleece)\nHumidify(aleece, ranice)\nManure(shelton, ranice)\nHumidify(shelton, aleece)\nnot Swill(ranice, aleece)\nSwill(ranice, shelton)\nnot Manure(ranice, aleece)\nnot Associate(ranice)\nChirpy(ranice)\nReedy(ranice)\nforall x (Humidify(x, ranice) and Manure(x, ranice) -> Swill(ranice, shelton))\nSwill(aleece, shelton) -> Humidify(aleece, ranice)\nforall x (Reedy(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Smiling(x) and Reedy(x) -> not Humidify(x, shelton))\nforall x (Swill(x, ranice) -> not Swill(x, shelton))\nnot Humidify(shelton, aleece) -> Riotous(shelton)\nforall x (Humidify(x, shelton) -> Swill(shelton, ranice))\nforall x (Reedy(x) and not Humidify(x, shelton) -> Associate(shelton))\n\nnot Reedy(shelton)\n\nnot Reedy(shelton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The carey is mistakable. The carey ransack the edythe. The benjamin teach the edythe. The benjamin ransack the carey. The edythe does not chase the carey. The edythe polemicise the benjamin. The edythe does not eat the carey. The edythe is not unhearable. The edythe is mistakable. The edythe is acapnotic. If something ransack the edythe and it teach the edythe then the edythe polemicise the benjamin. If the carey polemicise the benjamin then the carey ransack the edythe. All acapnotic things are nautical. If something is nautical and acapnotic then it does not like the benjamin. If something polemicise the edythe then it does not chase the benjamin. If the benjamin does not like the carey then the benjamin is respected. If something ransack the benjamin then the benjamin polemicise the edythe. If something is acapnotic and it does not like the benjamin then the benjamin is unhearable. The carey polemicise the benjamin.", "logic": "\nMistakable(carey)\nRansack(carey, edythe)\nTeach(benjamin, edythe)\nRansack(benjamin, carey)\nnot Polemicise(edythe, carey)\nPolemicise(edythe, benjamin)\nnot Teach(edythe, carey)\nnot Unhearable(edythe)\nMistakable(edythe)\nAcapnotic(edythe)\nforall x (Ransack(x, edythe) and Teach(x, edythe) -> Polemicise(edythe, benjamin))\nPolemicise(carey, benjamin) -> Ransack(carey, edythe)\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and Acapnotic(x) -> not Ransack(x, benjamin))\nforall x (Polemicise(x, edythe) -> not Polemicise(x, benjamin))\nnot Ransack(benjamin, carey) -> Respected(benjamin)\nforall x (Ransack(x, benjamin) -> Polemicise(benjamin, edythe))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) and not Ransack(x, benjamin) -> Unhearable(benjamin))\n\nPolemicise(carey, benjamin)\n\nPolemicise(carey, benjamin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The joslyn is furled. The joslyn overspend the clement. The aubrette prorate the clement. The aubrette overspend the joslyn. The clement does not chase the joslyn. The clement cloak the aubrette. The clement does not eat the joslyn. The clement is not pyrrhic. The clement is furled. The clement is complex. If something overspend the clement and it prorate the clement then the clement cloak the aubrette. If the joslyn cloak the aubrette then the joslyn overspend the clement. All complex things are unmarked. If something is unmarked and complex then it does not like the aubrette. If something cloak the clement then it does not chase the aubrette. If the aubrette does not like the joslyn then the aubrette is venal. If something overspend the aubrette then the aubrette cloak the clement. If something is complex and it does not like the aubrette then the aubrette is pyrrhic. The joslyn does not eat the aubrette.", "logic": "\nFurled(joslyn)\nOverspend(joslyn, clement)\nProrate(aubrette, clement)\nOverspend(aubrette, joslyn)\nnot Cloak(clement, joslyn)\nCloak(clement, aubrette)\nnot Prorate(clement, joslyn)\nnot Pyrrhic(clement)\nFurled(clement)\nComplex(clement)\nforall x (Overspend(x, clement) and Prorate(x, clement) -> Cloak(clement, aubrette))\nCloak(joslyn, aubrette) -> Overspend(joslyn, clement)\nforall x (Complex(x) -> Unmarked(x))\nforall x (Unmarked(x) and Complex(x) -> not Overspend(x, aubrette))\nforall x (Cloak(x, clement) -> not Cloak(x, aubrette))\nnot Overspend(aubrette, joslyn) -> Venal(aubrette)\nforall x (Overspend(x, aubrette) -> Cloak(aubrette, clement))\nforall x (Complex(x) and not Overspend(x, aubrette) -> Pyrrhic(aubrette))\n\nnot Prorate(joslyn, aubrette)\n\nnot Prorate(joslyn, aubrette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The langston is unaccepted. The langston hasten the georgeta. The pietro devalue the georgeta. The pietro hasten the langston. The georgeta does not chase the langston. The georgeta winterize the pietro. The georgeta does not eat the langston. The georgeta is not lienal. The georgeta is unaccepted. The georgeta is unawed. If something hasten the georgeta and it devalue the georgeta then the georgeta winterize the pietro. If the langston winterize the pietro then the langston hasten the georgeta. All unawed things are sorrel. If something is sorrel and unawed then it does not like the pietro. If something winterize the georgeta then it does not chase the pietro. If the pietro does not like the langston then the pietro is ungraceful. If something hasten the pietro then the pietro winterize the georgeta. If something is unawed and it does not like the pietro then the pietro is lienal. The georgeta winterize the georgeta.", "logic": "\nUnaccepted(langston)\nHasten(langston, georgeta)\nDevalue(pietro, georgeta)\nHasten(pietro, langston)\nnot Winterize(georgeta, langston)\nWinterize(georgeta, pietro)\nnot Devalue(georgeta, langston)\nnot Lienal(georgeta)\nUnaccepted(georgeta)\nUnawed(georgeta)\nforall x (Hasten(x, georgeta) and Devalue(x, georgeta) -> Winterize(georgeta, pietro))\nWinterize(langston, pietro) -> Hasten(langston, georgeta)\nforall x (Unawed(x) -> Sorrel(x))\nforall x (Sorrel(x) and Unawed(x) -> not Hasten(x, pietro))\nforall x (Winterize(x, georgeta) -> not Winterize(x, pietro))\nnot Hasten(pietro, langston) -> Ungraceful(pietro)\nforall x (Hasten(x, pietro) -> Winterize(pietro, georgeta))\nforall x (Unawed(x) and not Hasten(x, pietro) -> Lienal(pietro))\n\nWinterize(georgeta, georgeta)\n\nWinterize(georgeta, georgeta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-461"} {"premises": "The jaimie inveigh the benson. The jaimie is sophomore. The jaimie is feisty. The jaimie is whacking. The jaimie is ready. The jaimie is bobtailed. The jaimie refloat the benson. The jaimie motion the benson. The benson inveigh the jaimie. The benson is sophomore. The benson is feisty. The benson is ready. The benson is bobtailed. The benson refloat the jaimie. The benson motion the jaimie. If something refloat the benson then it inveigh the benson. If something inveigh the benson then the benson motion the jaimie. If something inveigh the benson then the benson inveigh the jaimie. If something refloat the jaimie and it is feisty then it motion the benson. If something motion the benson then it refloat the benson. If the benson is whacking and the benson is sophomore then the benson refloat the jaimie. If something motion the benson and it is sophomore then the benson is sophomore. If something inveigh the jaimie and the jaimie refloat the benson then the jaimie motion the benson. The benson inveigh the jaimie.", "logic": "\nInveigh(jaimie, benson)\nSophomore(jaimie)\nFeisty(jaimie)\nWhacking(jaimie)\nReady(jaimie)\nBobtailed(jaimie)\nRefloat(jaimie, benson)\nMotion(jaimie, benson)\nInveigh(benson, jaimie)\nSophomore(benson)\nFeisty(benson)\nReady(benson)\nBobtailed(benson)\nRefloat(benson, jaimie)\nMotion(benson, jaimie)\nforall x (Refloat(x, benson) -> Inveigh(x, benson))\nforall x (Inveigh(x, benson) -> Motion(benson, jaimie))\nforall x (Inveigh(x, benson) -> Inveigh(benson, jaimie))\nforall x (Refloat(x, jaimie) and Feisty(x) -> Motion(x, benson))\nforall x (Motion(x, benson) -> Refloat(x, benson))\nWhacking(benson) and Sophomore(benson) -> Refloat(benson, jaimie)\nforall x (Motion(x, benson) and Sophomore(x) -> Sophomore(benson))\nforall x (Inveigh(x, jaimie) and Refloat(jaimie, benson) -> Motion(jaimie, benson))\n\nInveigh(benson, jaimie)\n\ntherefore Inveigh(benson, jaimie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The schroeder tope the marieann. The schroeder is spherical. The schroeder is epitheliod. The schroeder is warring. The schroeder is disquieted. The schroeder is styptic. The schroeder comfort the marieann. The schroeder defect the marieann. The marieann tope the schroeder. The marieann is spherical. The marieann is epitheliod. The marieann is disquieted. The marieann is styptic. The marieann comfort the schroeder. The marieann defect the schroeder. If something comfort the marieann then it tope the marieann. If something tope the marieann then the marieann defect the schroeder. If something tope the marieann then the marieann tope the schroeder. If something comfort the schroeder and it is epitheliod then it defect the marieann. If something defect the marieann then it comfort the marieann. If the marieann is warring and the marieann is spherical then the marieann comfort the schroeder. If something defect the marieann and it is spherical then the marieann is spherical. If something tope the schroeder and the schroeder comfort the marieann then the schroeder defect the marieann. The marieann does not need the schroeder.", "logic": "\nTope(schroeder, marieann)\nSpherical(schroeder)\nEpitheliod(schroeder)\nWarring(schroeder)\nDisquieted(schroeder)\nStyptic(schroeder)\nComfort(schroeder, marieann)\nDefect(schroeder, marieann)\nTope(marieann, schroeder)\nSpherical(marieann)\nEpitheliod(marieann)\nDisquieted(marieann)\nStyptic(marieann)\nComfort(marieann, schroeder)\nDefect(marieann, schroeder)\nforall x (Comfort(x, marieann) -> Tope(x, marieann))\nforall x (Tope(x, marieann) -> Defect(marieann, schroeder))\nforall x (Tope(x, marieann) -> Tope(marieann, schroeder))\nforall x (Comfort(x, schroeder) and Epitheliod(x) -> Defect(x, marieann))\nforall x (Defect(x, marieann) -> Comfort(x, marieann))\nWarring(marieann) and Spherical(marieann) -> Comfort(marieann, schroeder)\nforall x (Defect(x, marieann) and Spherical(x) -> Spherical(marieann))\nforall x (Tope(x, schroeder) and Comfort(schroeder, marieann) -> Defect(schroeder, marieann))\n\nnot Comfort(marieann, schroeder)\n\ntherefore Comfort(marieann, schroeder)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The chelsea quench the cathleen. The chelsea is moody. The chelsea is improvised. The chelsea is circinate. The chelsea is curdled. The chelsea is unsecured. The chelsea keratinise the cathleen. The chelsea torch the cathleen. The cathleen quench the chelsea. The cathleen is moody. The cathleen is improvised. The cathleen is curdled. The cathleen is unsecured. The cathleen keratinise the chelsea. The cathleen torch the chelsea. If something keratinise the cathleen then it quench the cathleen. If something quench the cathleen then the cathleen torch the chelsea. If something quench the cathleen then the cathleen quench the chelsea. If something keratinise the chelsea and it is improvised then it torch the cathleen. If something torch the cathleen then it keratinise the cathleen. If the cathleen is circinate and the cathleen is moody then the cathleen keratinise the chelsea. If something torch the cathleen and it is moody then the cathleen is moody. If something quench the chelsea and the chelsea keratinise the cathleen then the chelsea torch the cathleen. The cathleen torch the cathleen.", "logic": "\nQuench(chelsea, cathleen)\nMoody(chelsea)\nImprovised(chelsea)\nCircinate(chelsea)\nCurdled(chelsea)\nUnsecured(chelsea)\nKeratinise(chelsea, cathleen)\nTorch(chelsea, cathleen)\nQuench(cathleen, chelsea)\nMoody(cathleen)\nImprovised(cathleen)\nCurdled(cathleen)\nUnsecured(cathleen)\nKeratinise(cathleen, chelsea)\nTorch(cathleen, chelsea)\nforall x (Keratinise(x, cathleen) -> Quench(x, cathleen))\nforall x (Quench(x, cathleen) -> Torch(cathleen, chelsea))\nforall x (Quench(x, cathleen) -> Quench(cathleen, chelsea))\nforall x (Keratinise(x, chelsea) and Improvised(x) -> Torch(x, cathleen))\nforall x (Torch(x, cathleen) -> Keratinise(x, cathleen))\nCircinate(cathleen) and Moody(cathleen) -> Keratinise(cathleen, chelsea)\nforall x (Torch(x, cathleen) and Moody(x) -> Moody(cathleen))\nforall x (Quench(x, chelsea) and Keratinise(chelsea, cathleen) -> Torch(chelsea, cathleen))\n\nTorch(cathleen, cathleen)\n\nKeratinise(cathleen, chelsea) and Improvised(cathleen) and forall x (Keratinise(x, chelsea) and Improvised(x) -> Torch(x, cathleen)) -> therefore Torch(cathleen, cathleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The audy loop the tamarah. The audy is lissom. The audy is aeriferous. The audy is chordate. The audy is incised. The audy is explosive. The audy clew the tamarah. The audy cloister the tamarah. The tamarah loop the audy. The tamarah is lissom. The tamarah is aeriferous. The tamarah is incised. The tamarah is explosive. The tamarah clew the audy. The tamarah cloister the audy. If something clew the tamarah then it loop the tamarah. If something loop the tamarah then the tamarah cloister the audy. If something loop the tamarah then the tamarah loop the audy. If something clew the audy and it is aeriferous then it cloister the tamarah. If something cloister the tamarah then it clew the tamarah. If the tamarah is chordate and the tamarah is lissom then the tamarah clew the audy. If something cloister the tamarah and it is lissom then the tamarah is lissom. If something loop the audy and the audy clew the tamarah then the audy cloister the tamarah. The tamarah does not see the tamarah.", "logic": "\nLoop(audy, tamarah)\nLissom(audy)\nAeriferous(audy)\nChordate(audy)\nIncised(audy)\nExplosive(audy)\nClew(audy, tamarah)\nCloister(audy, tamarah)\nLoop(tamarah, audy)\nLissom(tamarah)\nAeriferous(tamarah)\nIncised(tamarah)\nExplosive(tamarah)\nClew(tamarah, audy)\nCloister(tamarah, audy)\nforall x (Clew(x, tamarah) -> Loop(x, tamarah))\nforall x (Loop(x, tamarah) -> Cloister(tamarah, audy))\nforall x (Loop(x, tamarah) -> Loop(tamarah, audy))\nforall x (Clew(x, audy) and Aeriferous(x) -> Cloister(x, tamarah))\nforall x (Cloister(x, tamarah) -> Clew(x, tamarah))\nChordate(tamarah) and Lissom(tamarah) -> Clew(tamarah, audy)\nforall x (Cloister(x, tamarah) and Lissom(x) -> Lissom(tamarah))\nforall x (Loop(x, audy) and Clew(audy, tamarah) -> Cloister(audy, tamarah))\n\nnot Cloister(tamarah, tamarah)\n\nClew(tamarah, audy) and Aeriferous(tamarah) and forall x (Clew(x, audy) and Aeriferous(x) -> Cloister(x, tamarah)) -> therefore Cloister(tamarah, tamarah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The rebecka coronate the elianore. The rebecka is willing. The rebecka is bohemian. The rebecka is antinomian. The rebecka is serous. The rebecka is sleepy. The rebecka pain the elianore. The rebecka slabber the elianore. The elianore coronate the rebecka. The elianore is willing. The elianore is bohemian. The elianore is serous. The elianore is sleepy. The elianore pain the rebecka. The elianore slabber the rebecka. If something pain the elianore then it coronate the elianore. If something coronate the elianore then the elianore slabber the rebecka. If something coronate the elianore then the elianore coronate the rebecka. If something pain the rebecka and it is bohemian then it slabber the elianore. If something slabber the elianore then it pain the elianore. If the elianore is antinomian and the elianore is willing then the elianore pain the rebecka. If something slabber the elianore and it is willing then the elianore is willing. If something coronate the rebecka and the rebecka pain the elianore then the rebecka slabber the elianore. The elianore pain the elianore.", "logic": "\nCoronate(rebecka, elianore)\nWilling(rebecka)\nBohemian(rebecka)\nAntinomian(rebecka)\nSerous(rebecka)\nSleepy(rebecka)\nPain(rebecka, elianore)\nSlabber(rebecka, elianore)\nCoronate(elianore, rebecka)\nWilling(elianore)\nBohemian(elianore)\nSerous(elianore)\nSleepy(elianore)\nPain(elianore, rebecka)\nSlabber(elianore, rebecka)\nforall x (Pain(x, elianore) -> Coronate(x, elianore))\nforall x (Coronate(x, elianore) -> Slabber(elianore, rebecka))\nforall x (Coronate(x, elianore) -> Coronate(elianore, rebecka))\nforall x (Pain(x, rebecka) and Bohemian(x) -> Slabber(x, elianore))\nforall x (Slabber(x, elianore) -> Pain(x, elianore))\nAntinomian(elianore) and Willing(elianore) -> Pain(elianore, rebecka)\nforall x (Slabber(x, elianore) and Willing(x) -> Willing(elianore))\nforall x (Coronate(x, rebecka) and Pain(rebecka, elianore) -> Slabber(rebecka, elianore))\n\nPain(elianore, elianore)\n\nPain(elianore, rebecka) and Bohemian(elianore) and forall x (Pain(x, rebecka) and Bohemian(x) -> Slabber(x, elianore)) -> therefore Slabber(elianore, elianore) Slabber(elianore, elianore) and forall x (Slabber(x, elianore) -> Pain(x, elianore)) -> therefore Pain(elianore, elianore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The karry flock the delphina. The karry is navigable. The karry is cyclopean. The karry is bally. The karry is umbellate. The karry is uniformed. The karry acquit the delphina. The karry define the delphina. The delphina flock the karry. The delphina is navigable. The delphina is cyclopean. The delphina is umbellate. The delphina is uniformed. The delphina acquit the karry. The delphina define the karry. If something acquit the delphina then it flock the delphina. If something flock the delphina then the delphina define the karry. If something flock the delphina then the delphina flock the karry. If something acquit the karry and it is cyclopean then it define the delphina. If something define the delphina then it acquit the delphina. If the delphina is bally and the delphina is navigable then the delphina acquit the karry. If something define the delphina and it is navigable then the delphina is navigable. If something flock the karry and the karry acquit the delphina then the karry define the delphina. The delphina does not need the delphina.", "logic": "\nFlock(karry, delphina)\nNavigable(karry)\nCyclopean(karry)\nBally(karry)\nUmbellate(karry)\nUniformed(karry)\nAcquit(karry, delphina)\nDefine(karry, delphina)\nFlock(delphina, karry)\nNavigable(delphina)\nCyclopean(delphina)\nUmbellate(delphina)\nUniformed(delphina)\nAcquit(delphina, karry)\nDefine(delphina, karry)\nforall x (Acquit(x, delphina) -> Flock(x, delphina))\nforall x (Flock(x, delphina) -> Define(delphina, karry))\nforall x (Flock(x, delphina) -> Flock(delphina, karry))\nforall x (Acquit(x, karry) and Cyclopean(x) -> Define(x, delphina))\nforall x (Define(x, delphina) -> Acquit(x, delphina))\nBally(delphina) and Navigable(delphina) -> Acquit(delphina, karry)\nforall x (Define(x, delphina) and Navigable(x) -> Navigable(delphina))\nforall x (Flock(x, karry) and Acquit(karry, delphina) -> Define(karry, delphina))\n\nnot Acquit(delphina, delphina)\n\nAcquit(delphina, karry) and Cyclopean(delphina) and forall x (Acquit(x, karry) and Cyclopean(x) -> Define(x, delphina)) -> therefore Define(delphina, delphina) Define(delphina, delphina) and forall x (Define(x, delphina) -> Acquit(x, delphina)) -> therefore Acquit(delphina, delphina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The curtis backdate the tabby. The curtis is urbane. The curtis is mannered. The curtis is undutiful. The curtis is apogamous. The curtis is disastrous. The curtis freshen the tabby. The curtis farrow the tabby. The tabby backdate the curtis. The tabby is urbane. The tabby is mannered. The tabby is apogamous. The tabby is disastrous. The tabby freshen the curtis. The tabby farrow the curtis. If something freshen the tabby then it backdate the tabby. If something backdate the tabby then the tabby farrow the curtis. If something backdate the tabby then the tabby backdate the curtis. If something freshen the curtis and it is mannered then it farrow the tabby. If something farrow the tabby then it freshen the tabby. If the tabby is undutiful and the tabby is urbane then the tabby freshen the curtis. If something farrow the tabby and it is urbane then the tabby is urbane. If something backdate the curtis and the curtis freshen the tabby then the curtis farrow the tabby. The tabby backdate the tabby.", "logic": "\nBackdate(curtis, tabby)\nUrbane(curtis)\nMannered(curtis)\nUndutiful(curtis)\nApogamous(curtis)\nDisastrous(curtis)\nFreshen(curtis, tabby)\nFarrow(curtis, tabby)\nBackdate(tabby, curtis)\nUrbane(tabby)\nMannered(tabby)\nApogamous(tabby)\nDisastrous(tabby)\nFreshen(tabby, curtis)\nFarrow(tabby, curtis)\nforall x (Freshen(x, tabby) -> Backdate(x, tabby))\nforall x (Backdate(x, tabby) -> Farrow(tabby, curtis))\nforall x (Backdate(x, tabby) -> Backdate(tabby, curtis))\nforall x (Freshen(x, curtis) and Mannered(x) -> Farrow(x, tabby))\nforall x (Farrow(x, tabby) -> Freshen(x, tabby))\nUndutiful(tabby) and Urbane(tabby) -> Freshen(tabby, curtis)\nforall x (Farrow(x, tabby) and Urbane(x) -> Urbane(tabby))\nforall x (Backdate(x, curtis) and Freshen(curtis, tabby) -> Farrow(curtis, tabby))\n\nBackdate(tabby, tabby)\n\nFreshen(tabby, curtis) and Mannered(tabby) and forall x (Freshen(x, curtis) and Mannered(x) -> Farrow(x, tabby)) -> therefore Farrow(tabby, tabby) Farrow(tabby, tabby) and forall x (Farrow(x, tabby) -> Freshen(x, tabby)) -> therefore Freshen(tabby, tabby) Freshen(tabby, tabby) and forall x (Freshen(x, tabby) -> Backdate(x, tabby)) -> therefore Backdate(tabby, tabby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The adrienne symmetrize the estelle. The adrienne is gooselike. The adrienne is obovate. The adrienne is septate. The adrienne is affixal. The adrienne is nonopening. The adrienne crank the estelle. The adrienne object the estelle. The estelle symmetrize the adrienne. The estelle is gooselike. The estelle is obovate. The estelle is affixal. The estelle is nonopening. The estelle crank the adrienne. The estelle object the adrienne. If something crank the estelle then it symmetrize the estelle. If something symmetrize the estelle then the estelle object the adrienne. If something symmetrize the estelle then the estelle symmetrize the adrienne. If something crank the adrienne and it is obovate then it object the estelle. If something object the estelle then it crank the estelle. If the estelle is septate and the estelle is gooselike then the estelle crank the adrienne. If something object the estelle and it is gooselike then the estelle is gooselike. If something symmetrize the adrienne and the adrienne crank the estelle then the adrienne object the estelle. The estelle does not eat the estelle.", "logic": "\nSymmetrize(adrienne, estelle)\nGooselike(adrienne)\nObovate(adrienne)\nSeptate(adrienne)\nAffixal(adrienne)\nNonopening(adrienne)\nCrank(adrienne, estelle)\nObject(adrienne, estelle)\nSymmetrize(estelle, adrienne)\nGooselike(estelle)\nObovate(estelle)\nAffixal(estelle)\nNonopening(estelle)\nCrank(estelle, adrienne)\nObject(estelle, adrienne)\nforall x (Crank(x, estelle) -> Symmetrize(x, estelle))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, estelle) -> Object(estelle, adrienne))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, estelle) -> Symmetrize(estelle, adrienne))\nforall x (Crank(x, adrienne) and Obovate(x) -> Object(x, estelle))\nforall x (Object(x, estelle) -> Crank(x, estelle))\nSeptate(estelle) and Gooselike(estelle) -> Crank(estelle, adrienne)\nforall x (Object(x, estelle) and Gooselike(x) -> Gooselike(estelle))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, adrienne) and Crank(adrienne, estelle) -> Object(adrienne, estelle))\n\nnot Symmetrize(estelle, estelle)\n\nCrank(estelle, adrienne) and Obovate(estelle) and forall x (Crank(x, adrienne) and Obovate(x) -> Object(x, estelle)) -> therefore Object(estelle, estelle) Object(estelle, estelle) and forall x (Object(x, estelle) -> Crank(x, estelle)) -> therefore Crank(estelle, estelle) Crank(estelle, estelle) and forall x (Crank(x, estelle) -> Symmetrize(x, estelle)) -> therefore Symmetrize(estelle, estelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The kellina scamp the maxie. The kellina is unportable. The kellina is matted. The kellina is obsequious. The kellina is stabile. The kellina is reverend. The kellina bulldoze the maxie. The kellina unsnarl the maxie. The maxie scamp the kellina. The maxie is unportable. The maxie is matted. The maxie is stabile. The maxie is reverend. The maxie bulldoze the kellina. The maxie unsnarl the kellina. If something bulldoze the maxie then it scamp the maxie. If something scamp the maxie then the maxie unsnarl the kellina. If something scamp the maxie then the maxie scamp the kellina. If something bulldoze the kellina and it is matted then it unsnarl the maxie. If something unsnarl the maxie then it bulldoze the maxie. If the maxie is obsequious and the maxie is unportable then the maxie bulldoze the kellina. If something unsnarl the maxie and it is unportable then the maxie is unportable. If something scamp the kellina and the kellina bulldoze the maxie then the kellina unsnarl the maxie. The kellina does not eat the kellina.", "logic": "\nScamp(kellina, maxie)\nUnportable(kellina)\nMatted(kellina)\nObsequious(kellina)\nStabile(kellina)\nReverend(kellina)\nBulldoze(kellina, maxie)\nUnsnarl(kellina, maxie)\nScamp(maxie, kellina)\nUnportable(maxie)\nMatted(maxie)\nStabile(maxie)\nReverend(maxie)\nBulldoze(maxie, kellina)\nUnsnarl(maxie, kellina)\nforall x (Bulldoze(x, maxie) -> Scamp(x, maxie))\nforall x (Scamp(x, maxie) -> Unsnarl(maxie, kellina))\nforall x (Scamp(x, maxie) -> Scamp(maxie, kellina))\nforall x (Bulldoze(x, kellina) and Matted(x) -> Unsnarl(x, maxie))\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, maxie) -> Bulldoze(x, maxie))\nObsequious(maxie) and Unportable(maxie) -> Bulldoze(maxie, kellina)\nforall x (Unsnarl(x, maxie) and Unportable(x) -> Unportable(maxie))\nforall x (Scamp(x, kellina) and Bulldoze(kellina, maxie) -> Unsnarl(kellina, maxie))\n\nnot Scamp(kellina, kellina)\n\nnot Scamp(kellina, kellina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The glennie charleston the remy. The glennie is crass. The glennie is acoustical. The glennie is born. The glennie is mitigatory. The glennie is cephalic. The glennie stay the remy. The glennie sandwich the remy. The remy charleston the glennie. The remy is crass. The remy is acoustical. The remy is mitigatory. The remy is cephalic. The remy stay the glennie. The remy sandwich the glennie. If something stay the remy then it charleston the remy. If something charleston the remy then the remy sandwich the glennie. If something charleston the remy then the remy charleston the glennie. If something stay the glennie and it is acoustical then it sandwich the remy. If something sandwich the remy then it stay the remy. If the remy is born and the remy is crass then the remy stay the glennie. If something sandwich the remy and it is crass then the remy is crass. If something charleston the glennie and the glennie stay the remy then the glennie sandwich the remy. The glennie stay the glennie.", "logic": "\nCharleston(glennie, remy)\nCrass(glennie)\nAcoustical(glennie)\nBorn(glennie)\nMitigatory(glennie)\nCephalic(glennie)\nStay(glennie, remy)\nSandwich(glennie, remy)\nCharleston(remy, glennie)\nCrass(remy)\nAcoustical(remy)\nMitigatory(remy)\nCephalic(remy)\nStay(remy, glennie)\nSandwich(remy, glennie)\nforall x (Stay(x, remy) -> Charleston(x, remy))\nforall x (Charleston(x, remy) -> Sandwich(remy, glennie))\nforall x (Charleston(x, remy) -> Charleston(remy, glennie))\nforall x (Stay(x, glennie) and Acoustical(x) -> Sandwich(x, remy))\nforall x (Sandwich(x, remy) -> Stay(x, remy))\nBorn(remy) and Crass(remy) -> Stay(remy, glennie)\nforall x (Sandwich(x, remy) and Crass(x) -> Crass(remy))\nforall x (Charleston(x, glennie) and Stay(glennie, remy) -> Sandwich(glennie, remy))\n\nStay(glennie, glennie)\n\nStay(glennie, glennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The catie bloom the emile. The catie is acyclic. The catie is societal. The catie is formulary. The catie is syrupy. The catie is swooning. The catie caterwaul the emile. The catie forest the emile. The emile bloom the catie. The emile is acyclic. The emile is societal. The emile is syrupy. The emile is swooning. The emile caterwaul the catie. The emile forest the catie. If something caterwaul the emile then it bloom the emile. If something bloom the emile then the emile forest the catie. If something bloom the emile then the emile bloom the catie. If something caterwaul the catie and it is societal then it forest the emile. If something forest the emile then it caterwaul the emile. If the emile is formulary and the emile is acyclic then the emile caterwaul the catie. If something forest the emile and it is acyclic then the emile is acyclic. If something bloom the catie and the catie caterwaul the emile then the catie forest the emile. The catie does not see the catie.", "logic": "\nBloom(catie, emile)\nAcyclic(catie)\nSocietal(catie)\nFormulary(catie)\nSyrupy(catie)\nSwooning(catie)\nCaterwaul(catie, emile)\nForest(catie, emile)\nBloom(emile, catie)\nAcyclic(emile)\nSocietal(emile)\nSyrupy(emile)\nSwooning(emile)\nCaterwaul(emile, catie)\nForest(emile, catie)\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, emile) -> Bloom(x, emile))\nforall x (Bloom(x, emile) -> Forest(emile, catie))\nforall x (Bloom(x, emile) -> Bloom(emile, catie))\nforall x (Caterwaul(x, catie) and Societal(x) -> Forest(x, emile))\nforall x (Forest(x, emile) -> Caterwaul(x, emile))\nFormulary(emile) and Acyclic(emile) -> Caterwaul(emile, catie)\nforall x (Forest(x, emile) and Acyclic(x) -> Acyclic(emile))\nforall x (Bloom(x, catie) and Caterwaul(catie, emile) -> Forest(catie, emile))\n\nnot Forest(catie, catie)\n\nnot Forest(catie, catie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The heywood loll the priscilla. The heywood is outlawed. The heywood is renunciant. The heywood is underage. The heywood is altricial. The heywood is bayesian. The heywood hunt the priscilla. The heywood denitrify the priscilla. The priscilla loll the heywood. The priscilla is outlawed. The priscilla is renunciant. The priscilla is altricial. The priscilla is bayesian. The priscilla hunt the heywood. The priscilla denitrify the heywood. If something hunt the priscilla then it loll the priscilla. If something loll the priscilla then the priscilla denitrify the heywood. If something loll the priscilla then the priscilla loll the heywood. If something hunt the heywood and it is renunciant then it denitrify the priscilla. If something denitrify the priscilla then it hunt the priscilla. If the priscilla is underage and the priscilla is outlawed then the priscilla hunt the heywood. If something denitrify the priscilla and it is outlawed then the priscilla is outlawed. If something loll the heywood and the heywood hunt the priscilla then the heywood denitrify the priscilla. The priscilla is underage.", "logic": "\nLoll(heywood, priscilla)\nOutlawed(heywood)\nRenunciant(heywood)\nUnderage(heywood)\nAltricial(heywood)\nBayesian(heywood)\nHunt(heywood, priscilla)\nDenitrify(heywood, priscilla)\nLoll(priscilla, heywood)\nOutlawed(priscilla)\nRenunciant(priscilla)\nAltricial(priscilla)\nBayesian(priscilla)\nHunt(priscilla, heywood)\nDenitrify(priscilla, heywood)\nforall x (Hunt(x, priscilla) -> Loll(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Loll(x, priscilla) -> Denitrify(priscilla, heywood))\nforall x (Loll(x, priscilla) -> Loll(priscilla, heywood))\nforall x (Hunt(x, heywood) and Renunciant(x) -> Denitrify(x, priscilla))\nforall x (Denitrify(x, priscilla) -> Hunt(x, priscilla))\nUnderage(priscilla) and Outlawed(priscilla) -> Hunt(priscilla, heywood)\nforall x (Denitrify(x, priscilla) and Outlawed(x) -> Outlawed(priscilla))\nforall x (Loll(x, heywood) and Hunt(heywood, priscilla) -> Denitrify(heywood, priscilla))\n\nUnderage(priscilla)\n\nUnderage(priscilla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-81"} {"premises": "The samaria blandish the daffy. The clemmy jubilate the samaria. The daffy is flaring. If something undercoat the samaria then it blandish the clemmy. If something blandish the daffy then the daffy jubilate the clemmy. If something jubilate the clemmy and the clemmy jubilate the samaria then it undercoat the samaria. If something is dynamic and it blandish the daffy then it undercoat the clemmy. If the samaria jubilate the daffy and the samaria is algid then the daffy blandish the clemmy. If something blandish the daffy then it is unnerved. If something blandish the clemmy and it jubilate the daffy then the clemmy jubilate the samaria. If something jubilate the clemmy then the clemmy is dynamic. The samaria blandish the daffy.", "logic": "\nBlandish(samaria, daffy)\nJubilate(clemmy, samaria)\nFlaring(daffy)\nforall x (Undercoat(x, samaria) -> Blandish(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Blandish(x, daffy) -> Jubilate(daffy, clemmy))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, clemmy) and Jubilate(clemmy, samaria) -> Undercoat(x, samaria))\nforall x (Dynamic(x) and Blandish(x, daffy) -> Undercoat(x, clemmy))\nJubilate(samaria, daffy) and Algid(samaria) -> Blandish(daffy, clemmy)\nforall x (Blandish(x, daffy) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Blandish(x, clemmy) and Jubilate(x, daffy) -> Jubilate(clemmy, samaria))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, clemmy) -> Dynamic(clemmy))\n\nBlandish(samaria, daffy)\n\ntherefore Blandish(samaria, daffy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The darrel chime the ellynn. The beulah quiet the darrel. The ellynn is neuronal. If something fecundate the darrel then it chime the beulah. If something chime the ellynn then the ellynn quiet the beulah. If something quiet the beulah and the beulah quiet the darrel then it fecundate the darrel. If something is bumpy and it chime the ellynn then it fecundate the beulah. If the darrel quiet the ellynn and the darrel is hearsay then the ellynn chime the beulah. If something chime the ellynn then it is unpainful. If something chime the beulah and it quiet the ellynn then the beulah quiet the darrel. If something quiet the beulah then the beulah is bumpy. The darrel does not eat the ellynn.", "logic": "\nChime(darrel, ellynn)\nQuiet(beulah, darrel)\nNeuronal(ellynn)\nforall x (Fecundate(x, darrel) -> Chime(x, beulah))\nforall x (Chime(x, ellynn) -> Quiet(ellynn, beulah))\nforall x (Quiet(x, beulah) and Quiet(beulah, darrel) -> Fecundate(x, darrel))\nforall x (Bumpy(x) and Chime(x, ellynn) -> Fecundate(x, beulah))\nQuiet(darrel, ellynn) and Hearsay(darrel) -> Chime(ellynn, beulah)\nforall x (Chime(x, ellynn) -> Unpainful(x))\nforall x (Chime(x, beulah) and Quiet(x, ellynn) -> Quiet(beulah, darrel))\nforall x (Quiet(x, beulah) -> Bumpy(beulah))\n\nnot Chime(darrel, ellynn)\n\ntherefore Chime(darrel, ellynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The tadeas embrangle the rem. The gwenni wobble the tadeas. The rem is meagerly. If something tether the tadeas then it embrangle the gwenni. If something embrangle the rem then the rem wobble the gwenni. If something wobble the gwenni and the gwenni wobble the tadeas then it tether the tadeas. If something is radiopaque and it embrangle the rem then it tether the gwenni. If the tadeas wobble the rem and the tadeas is prolific then the rem embrangle the gwenni. If something embrangle the rem then it is unhardened. If something embrangle the gwenni and it wobble the rem then the gwenni wobble the tadeas. If something wobble the gwenni then the gwenni is radiopaque. The tadeas is unhardened.", "logic": "\nEmbrangle(tadeas, rem)\nWobble(gwenni, tadeas)\nMeagerly(rem)\nforall x (Tether(x, tadeas) -> Embrangle(x, gwenni))\nforall x (Embrangle(x, rem) -> Wobble(rem, gwenni))\nforall x (Wobble(x, gwenni) and Wobble(gwenni, tadeas) -> Tether(x, tadeas))\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) and Embrangle(x, rem) -> Tether(x, gwenni))\nWobble(tadeas, rem) and Prolific(tadeas) -> Embrangle(rem, gwenni)\nforall x (Embrangle(x, rem) -> Unhardened(x))\nforall x (Embrangle(x, gwenni) and Wobble(x, rem) -> Wobble(gwenni, tadeas))\nforall x (Wobble(x, gwenni) -> Radiopaque(gwenni))\n\nUnhardened(tadeas)\n\nEmbrangle(tadeas, rem) and forall x (Embrangle(x, rem) -> Unhardened(x)) -> therefore Unhardened(tadeas)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The filmore palatalise the umeko. The glynis follow the filmore. The umeko is astrocytic. If something yawn the filmore then it palatalise the glynis. If something palatalise the umeko then the umeko follow the glynis. If something follow the glynis and the glynis follow the filmore then it yawn the filmore. If something is carotid and it palatalise the umeko then it yawn the glynis. If the filmore follow the umeko and the filmore is teeming then the umeko palatalise the glynis. If something palatalise the umeko then it is woolen. If something palatalise the glynis and it follow the umeko then the glynis follow the filmore. If something follow the glynis then the glynis is carotid. The umeko does not chase the glynis.", "logic": "\nPalatalise(filmore, umeko)\nFollow(glynis, filmore)\nAstrocytic(umeko)\nforall x (Yawn(x, filmore) -> Palatalise(x, glynis))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, umeko) -> Follow(umeko, glynis))\nforall x (Follow(x, glynis) and Follow(glynis, filmore) -> Yawn(x, filmore))\nforall x (Carotid(x) and Palatalise(x, umeko) -> Yawn(x, glynis))\nFollow(filmore, umeko) and Teeming(filmore) -> Palatalise(umeko, glynis)\nforall x (Palatalise(x, umeko) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, glynis) and Follow(x, umeko) -> Follow(glynis, filmore))\nforall x (Follow(x, glynis) -> Carotid(glynis))\n\nnot Follow(umeko, glynis)\n\nPalatalise(filmore, umeko) and forall x (Palatalise(x, umeko) -> Follow(umeko, glynis)) -> therefore Follow(umeko, glynis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The ole causeway the berny. The algernon brooch the ole. The berny is timed. If something fork the ole then it causeway the algernon. If something causeway the berny then the berny brooch the algernon. If something brooch the algernon and the algernon brooch the ole then it fork the ole. If something is sadistic and it causeway the berny then it fork the algernon. If the ole brooch the berny and the ole is casebook then the berny causeway the algernon. If something causeway the berny then it is greatest. If something causeway the algernon and it brooch the berny then the algernon brooch the ole. If something brooch the algernon then the algernon is sadistic. The berny fork the ole.", "logic": "\nCauseway(ole, berny)\nBrooch(algernon, ole)\nTimed(berny)\nforall x (Fork(x, ole) -> Causeway(x, algernon))\nforall x (Causeway(x, berny) -> Brooch(berny, algernon))\nforall x (Brooch(x, algernon) and Brooch(algernon, ole) -> Fork(x, ole))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Causeway(x, berny) -> Fork(x, algernon))\nBrooch(ole, berny) and Casebook(ole) -> Causeway(berny, algernon)\nforall x (Causeway(x, berny) -> Greatest(x))\nforall x (Causeway(x, algernon) and Brooch(x, berny) -> Brooch(algernon, ole))\nforall x (Brooch(x, algernon) -> Sadistic(algernon))\n\nFork(berny, ole)\n\nCauseway(ole, berny) and forall x (Causeway(x, berny) -> Brooch(berny, algernon)) -> therefore Brooch(berny, algernon) Brooch(berny, algernon) and Brooch(algernon, ole) and forall x (Brooch(x, algernon) and Brooch(algernon, ole) -> Fork(x, ole)) -> therefore Fork(berny, ole)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The shayna radicalize the winnie. The vaclav ogle the shayna. The winnie is bulbar. If something hound the shayna then it radicalize the vaclav. If something radicalize the winnie then the winnie ogle the vaclav. If something ogle the vaclav and the vaclav ogle the shayna then it hound the shayna. If something is cyclical and it radicalize the winnie then it hound the vaclav. If the shayna ogle the winnie and the shayna is diffusive then the winnie radicalize the vaclav. If something radicalize the winnie then it is teentsy. If something radicalize the vaclav and it ogle the winnie then the vaclav ogle the shayna. If something ogle the vaclav then the vaclav is cyclical. The winnie does not visit the shayna.", "logic": "\nRadicalize(shayna, winnie)\nOgle(vaclav, shayna)\nBulbar(winnie)\nforall x (Hound(x, shayna) -> Radicalize(x, vaclav))\nforall x (Radicalize(x, winnie) -> Ogle(winnie, vaclav))\nforall x (Ogle(x, vaclav) and Ogle(vaclav, shayna) -> Hound(x, shayna))\nforall x (Cyclical(x) and Radicalize(x, winnie) -> Hound(x, vaclav))\nOgle(shayna, winnie) and Diffusive(shayna) -> Radicalize(winnie, vaclav)\nforall x (Radicalize(x, winnie) -> Teentsy(x))\nforall x (Radicalize(x, vaclav) and Ogle(x, winnie) -> Ogle(vaclav, shayna))\nforall x (Ogle(x, vaclav) -> Cyclical(vaclav))\n\nnot Hound(winnie, shayna)\n\nRadicalize(shayna, winnie) and forall x (Radicalize(x, winnie) -> Ogle(winnie, vaclav)) -> therefore Ogle(winnie, vaclav) Ogle(winnie, vaclav) and Ogle(vaclav, shayna) and forall x (Ogle(x, vaclav) and Ogle(vaclav, shayna) -> Hound(x, shayna)) -> therefore Hound(winnie, shayna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The michelina calve the jerrilyn. The brody ting the michelina. The jerrilyn is reinforced. If something remarry the michelina then it calve the brody. If something calve the jerrilyn then the jerrilyn ting the brody. If something ting the brody and the brody ting the michelina then it remarry the michelina. If something is wound and it calve the jerrilyn then it remarry the brody. If the michelina ting the jerrilyn and the michelina is anodal then the jerrilyn calve the brody. If something calve the jerrilyn then it is unwarmed. If something calve the brody and it ting the jerrilyn then the brody ting the michelina. If something ting the brody then the brody is wound. The jerrilyn calve the brody.", "logic": "\nCalve(michelina, jerrilyn)\nTing(brody, michelina)\nReinforced(jerrilyn)\nforall x (Remarry(x, michelina) -> Calve(x, brody))\nforall x (Calve(x, jerrilyn) -> Ting(jerrilyn, brody))\nforall x (Ting(x, brody) and Ting(brody, michelina) -> Remarry(x, michelina))\nforall x (Wound(x) and Calve(x, jerrilyn) -> Remarry(x, brody))\nTing(michelina, jerrilyn) and Anodal(michelina) -> Calve(jerrilyn, brody)\nforall x (Calve(x, jerrilyn) -> Unwarmed(x))\nforall x (Calve(x, brody) and Ting(x, jerrilyn) -> Ting(brody, michelina))\nforall x (Ting(x, brody) -> Wound(brody))\n\nCalve(jerrilyn, brody)\n\nCalve(michelina, jerrilyn) and forall x (Calve(x, jerrilyn) -> Ting(jerrilyn, brody)) -> therefore Ting(jerrilyn, brody) Ting(jerrilyn, brody) and Ting(brody, michelina) and forall x (Ting(x, brody) and Ting(brody, michelina) -> Remarry(x, michelina)) -> therefore Remarry(jerrilyn, michelina) Remarry(jerrilyn, michelina) and forall x (Remarry(x, michelina) -> Calve(x, brody)) -> therefore Calve(jerrilyn, brody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The meredith arch the gina. The almeda perpetrate the meredith. The gina is acetabular. If something overrule the meredith then it arch the almeda. If something arch the gina then the gina perpetrate the almeda. If something perpetrate the almeda and the almeda perpetrate the meredith then it overrule the meredith. If something is pinstriped and it arch the gina then it overrule the almeda. If the meredith perpetrate the gina and the meredith is fighting then the gina arch the almeda. If something arch the gina then it is coptic. If something arch the almeda and it perpetrate the gina then the almeda perpetrate the meredith. If something perpetrate the almeda then the almeda is pinstriped. The gina does not eat the almeda.", "logic": "\nArch(meredith, gina)\nPerpetrate(almeda, meredith)\nAcetabular(gina)\nforall x (Overrule(x, meredith) -> Arch(x, almeda))\nforall x (Arch(x, gina) -> Perpetrate(gina, almeda))\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, almeda) and Perpetrate(almeda, meredith) -> Overrule(x, meredith))\nforall x (Pinstriped(x) and Arch(x, gina) -> Overrule(x, almeda))\nPerpetrate(meredith, gina) and Fighting(meredith) -> Arch(gina, almeda)\nforall x (Arch(x, gina) -> Coptic(x))\nforall x (Arch(x, almeda) and Perpetrate(x, gina) -> Perpetrate(almeda, meredith))\nforall x (Perpetrate(x, almeda) -> Pinstriped(almeda))\n\nnot Arch(gina, almeda)\n\nArch(meredith, gina) and forall x (Arch(x, gina) -> Perpetrate(gina, almeda)) -> therefore Perpetrate(gina, almeda) Perpetrate(gina, almeda) and Perpetrate(almeda, meredith) and forall x (Perpetrate(x, almeda) and Perpetrate(almeda, meredith) -> Overrule(x, meredith)) -> therefore Overrule(gina, meredith) Overrule(gina, meredith) and forall x (Overrule(x, meredith) -> Arch(x, almeda)) -> therefore Arch(gina, almeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The petunia ghettoise the lyndsey. The bradford resurface the petunia. The lyndsey is ascetical. If something azure the petunia then it ghettoise the bradford. If something ghettoise the lyndsey then the lyndsey resurface the bradford. If something resurface the bradford and the bradford resurface the petunia then it azure the petunia. If something is parotid and it ghettoise the lyndsey then it azure the bradford. If the petunia resurface the lyndsey and the petunia is fabricated then the lyndsey ghettoise the bradford. If something ghettoise the lyndsey then it is shriveled. If something ghettoise the bradford and it resurface the lyndsey then the bradford resurface the petunia. If something resurface the bradford then the bradford is parotid. The bradford is not shriveled.", "logic": "\nGhettoise(petunia, lyndsey)\nResurface(bradford, petunia)\nAscetical(lyndsey)\nforall x (Azure(x, petunia) -> Ghettoise(x, bradford))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, lyndsey) -> Resurface(lyndsey, bradford))\nforall x (Resurface(x, bradford) and Resurface(bradford, petunia) -> Azure(x, petunia))\nforall x (Parotid(x) and Ghettoise(x, lyndsey) -> Azure(x, bradford))\nResurface(petunia, lyndsey) and Fabricated(petunia) -> Ghettoise(lyndsey, bradford)\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, lyndsey) -> Shriveled(x))\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, bradford) and Resurface(x, lyndsey) -> Resurface(bradford, petunia))\nforall x (Resurface(x, bradford) -> Parotid(bradford))\n\nnot Shriveled(bradford)\n\nforall x (Ghettoise(x, lyndsey) -> Shriveled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The sharlene welch the sunny. The jed murder the sharlene. The sunny is crested. If something fleet the sharlene then it welch the jed. If something welch the sunny then the sunny murder the jed. If something murder the jed and the jed murder the sharlene then it fleet the sharlene. If something is opposable and it welch the sunny then it fleet the jed. If the sharlene murder the sunny and the sharlene is forested then the sunny welch the jed. If something welch the sunny then it is roughish. If something welch the jed and it murder the sunny then the jed murder the sharlene. If something murder the jed then the jed is opposable. The jed fleet the sharlene.", "logic": "\nWelch(sharlene, sunny)\nMurder(jed, sharlene)\nCrested(sunny)\nforall x (Fleet(x, sharlene) -> Welch(x, jed))\nforall x (Welch(x, sunny) -> Murder(sunny, jed))\nforall x (Murder(x, jed) and Murder(jed, sharlene) -> Fleet(x, sharlene))\nforall x (Opposable(x) and Welch(x, sunny) -> Fleet(x, jed))\nMurder(sharlene, sunny) and Forested(sharlene) -> Welch(sunny, jed)\nforall x (Welch(x, sunny) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Welch(x, jed) and Murder(x, sunny) -> Murder(jed, sharlene))\nforall x (Murder(x, jed) -> Opposable(jed))\n\nFleet(jed, sharlene)\n\nforall x (Murder(x, jed) and Murder(jed, sharlene) -> Fleet(x, sharlene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The kam goad the titos. The zita mensurate the kam. The titos is parhelic. If something rearrange the kam then it goad the zita. If something goad the titos then the titos mensurate the zita. If something mensurate the zita and the zita mensurate the kam then it rearrange the kam. If something is micropylar and it goad the titos then it rearrange the zita. If the kam mensurate the titos and the kam is countless then the titos goad the zita. If something goad the titos then it is ghanese. If something goad the zita and it mensurate the titos then the zita mensurate the kam. If something mensurate the zita then the zita is micropylar. The titos does not visit the zita.", "logic": "\nGoad(kam, titos)\nMensurate(zita, kam)\nParhelic(titos)\nforall x (Rearrange(x, kam) -> Goad(x, zita))\nforall x (Goad(x, titos) -> Mensurate(titos, zita))\nforall x (Mensurate(x, zita) and Mensurate(zita, kam) -> Rearrange(x, kam))\nforall x (Micropylar(x) and Goad(x, titos) -> Rearrange(x, zita))\nMensurate(kam, titos) and Countless(kam) -> Goad(titos, zita)\nforall x (Goad(x, titos) -> Ghanese(x))\nforall x (Goad(x, zita) and Mensurate(x, titos) -> Mensurate(zita, kam))\nforall x (Mensurate(x, zita) -> Micropylar(zita))\n\nnot Rearrange(titos, zita)\n\nforall x (Micropylar(x) and Goad(x, titos) -> Rearrange(x, zita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The helen dishonor the pierce. The wilbur glare the helen. The pierce is bonny. If something lollygag the helen then it dishonor the wilbur. If something dishonor the pierce then the pierce glare the wilbur. If something glare the wilbur and the wilbur glare the helen then it lollygag the helen. If something is harmonized and it dishonor the pierce then it lollygag the wilbur. If the helen glare the pierce and the helen is wingless then the pierce dishonor the wilbur. If something dishonor the pierce then it is unclipped. If something dishonor the wilbur and it glare the pierce then the wilbur glare the helen. If something glare the wilbur then the wilbur is harmonized. The wilbur lollygag the wilbur.", "logic": "\nDishonor(helen, pierce)\nGlare(wilbur, helen)\nBonny(pierce)\nforall x (Lollygag(x, helen) -> Dishonor(x, wilbur))\nforall x (Dishonor(x, pierce) -> Glare(pierce, wilbur))\nforall x (Glare(x, wilbur) and Glare(wilbur, helen) -> Lollygag(x, helen))\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and Dishonor(x, pierce) -> Lollygag(x, wilbur))\nGlare(helen, pierce) and Wingless(helen) -> Dishonor(pierce, wilbur)\nforall x (Dishonor(x, pierce) -> Unclipped(x))\nforall x (Dishonor(x, wilbur) and Glare(x, pierce) -> Glare(wilbur, helen))\nforall x (Glare(x, wilbur) -> Harmonized(wilbur))\n\nLollygag(wilbur, wilbur)\n\nforall x (Harmonized(x) and Dishonor(x, pierce) -> Lollygag(x, wilbur)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The katine scalp the dione. The florentia clout the katine. The dione is flagrant. If something outbalance the katine then it scalp the florentia. If something scalp the dione then the dione clout the florentia. If something clout the florentia and the florentia clout the katine then it outbalance the katine. If something is vermicular and it scalp the dione then it outbalance the florentia. If the katine clout the dione and the katine is pencilled then the dione scalp the florentia. If something scalp the dione then it is acinous. If something scalp the florentia and it clout the dione then the florentia clout the katine. If something clout the florentia then the florentia is vermicular. The florentia does not chase the florentia.", "logic": "\nScalp(katine, dione)\nClout(florentia, katine)\nFlagrant(dione)\nforall x (Outbalance(x, katine) -> Scalp(x, florentia))\nforall x (Scalp(x, dione) -> Clout(dione, florentia))\nforall x (Clout(x, florentia) and Clout(florentia, katine) -> Outbalance(x, katine))\nforall x (Vermicular(x) and Scalp(x, dione) -> Outbalance(x, florentia))\nClout(katine, dione) and Pencilled(katine) -> Scalp(dione, florentia)\nforall x (Scalp(x, dione) -> Acinous(x))\nforall x (Scalp(x, florentia) and Clout(x, dione) -> Clout(florentia, katine))\nforall x (Clout(x, florentia) -> Vermicular(florentia))\n\nnot Clout(florentia, florentia)\n\nnot Clout(florentia, florentia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The lawson terrorise the bela. The florrie erode the lawson. The bela is melanesian. If something whir the lawson then it terrorise the florrie. If something terrorise the bela then the bela erode the florrie. If something erode the florrie and the florrie erode the lawson then it whir the lawson. If something is indolent and it terrorise the bela then it whir the florrie. If the lawson erode the bela and the lawson is nineteen then the bela terrorise the florrie. If something terrorise the bela then it is arachnoid. If something terrorise the florrie and it erode the bela then the florrie erode the lawson. If something erode the florrie then the florrie is indolent. The lawson terrorise the lawson.", "logic": "\nTerrorise(lawson, bela)\nErode(florrie, lawson)\nMelanesian(bela)\nforall x (Whir(x, lawson) -> Terrorise(x, florrie))\nforall x (Terrorise(x, bela) -> Erode(bela, florrie))\nforall x (Erode(x, florrie) and Erode(florrie, lawson) -> Whir(x, lawson))\nforall x (Indolent(x) and Terrorise(x, bela) -> Whir(x, florrie))\nErode(lawson, bela) and Nineteen(lawson) -> Terrorise(bela, florrie)\nforall x (Terrorise(x, bela) -> Arachnoid(x))\nforall x (Terrorise(x, florrie) and Erode(x, bela) -> Erode(florrie, lawson))\nforall x (Erode(x, florrie) -> Indolent(florrie))\n\nTerrorise(lawson, lawson)\n\nTerrorise(lawson, lawson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The almeria rumple the lois. The yves embolden the almeria. The lois is pointed. If something braze the almeria then it rumple the yves. If something rumple the lois then the lois embolden the yves. If something embolden the yves and the yves embolden the almeria then it braze the almeria. If something is masterful and it rumple the lois then it braze the yves. If the almeria embolden the lois and the almeria is multiform then the lois rumple the yves. If something rumple the lois then it is andean. If something rumple the yves and it embolden the lois then the yves embolden the almeria. If something embolden the yves then the yves is masterful. The almeria is not multiform.", "logic": "\nRumple(almeria, lois)\nEmbolden(yves, almeria)\nPointed(lois)\nforall x (Braze(x, almeria) -> Rumple(x, yves))\nforall x (Rumple(x, lois) -> Embolden(lois, yves))\nforall x (Embolden(x, yves) and Embolden(yves, almeria) -> Braze(x, almeria))\nforall x (Masterful(x) and Rumple(x, lois) -> Braze(x, yves))\nEmbolden(almeria, lois) and Multiform(almeria) -> Rumple(lois, yves)\nforall x (Rumple(x, lois) -> Andean(x))\nforall x (Rumple(x, yves) and Embolden(x, lois) -> Embolden(yves, almeria))\nforall x (Embolden(x, yves) -> Masterful(yves))\n\nnot Multiform(almeria)\n\nnot Multiform(almeria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The deana unmake the leoline. The tiphanie restart the deana. The leoline is undried. If something birdwatch the deana then it unmake the tiphanie. If something unmake the leoline then the leoline restart the tiphanie. If something restart the tiphanie and the tiphanie restart the deana then it birdwatch the deana. If something is unsleeping and it unmake the leoline then it birdwatch the tiphanie. If the deana restart the leoline and the deana is subclavian then the leoline unmake the tiphanie. If something unmake the leoline then it is shipshape. If something unmake the tiphanie and it restart the leoline then the tiphanie restart the deana. If something restart the tiphanie then the tiphanie is unsleeping. The deana restart the deana.", "logic": "\nUnmake(deana, leoline)\nRestart(tiphanie, deana)\nUndried(leoline)\nforall x (Birdwatch(x, deana) -> Unmake(x, tiphanie))\nforall x (Unmake(x, leoline) -> Restart(leoline, tiphanie))\nforall x (Restart(x, tiphanie) and Restart(tiphanie, deana) -> Birdwatch(x, deana))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) and Unmake(x, leoline) -> Birdwatch(x, tiphanie))\nRestart(deana, leoline) and Subclavian(deana) -> Unmake(leoline, tiphanie)\nforall x (Unmake(x, leoline) -> Shipshape(x))\nforall x (Unmake(x, tiphanie) and Restart(x, leoline) -> Restart(tiphanie, deana))\nforall x (Restart(x, tiphanie) -> Unsleeping(tiphanie))\n\nRestart(deana, deana)\n\nRestart(deana, deana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-52"} {"premises": "The fanya coal the joete. The joete scrimshank the fanya. The joete scrimshank the darius. The joete retail the fanya. The joete retail the darius. The joete coal the fanya. The joete coal the darius. The darius scrimshank the fanya. The darius scrimshank the joete. The darius is naive. The darius is unsated. The darius retail the fanya. The darius retail the joete. The darius coal the fanya. The darius coal the joete. If someone scrimshank the joete then they chase the fanya. If someone is disfigured then they like the fanya. If someone scrimshank the joete and they are naive then they like the fanya. If someone coal the fanya and they are ingenious then the fanya retail the darius. If someone retail the darius then they are ingenious. If someone retail the fanya and they are naive then the fanya coal the darius. The darius retail the joete.", "logic": "\nCoal(fanya, joete)\nScrimshank(joete, fanya)\nScrimshank(joete, darius)\nRetail(joete, fanya)\nRetail(joete, darius)\nCoal(joete, fanya)\nCoal(joete, darius)\nScrimshank(darius, fanya)\nScrimshank(darius, joete)\nNaive(darius)\nUnsated(darius)\nRetail(darius, fanya)\nRetail(darius, joete)\nCoal(darius, fanya)\nCoal(darius, joete)\nforall x (Scrimshank(x, joete) -> Scrimshank(x, fanya))\nforall x (Disfigured(x) -> Retail(x, fanya))\nforall x (Scrimshank(x, joete) and Naive(x) -> Retail(x, fanya))\nforall x (Coal(x, fanya) and Ingenious(x) -> Retail(fanya, darius))\nforall x (Retail(x, darius) -> Ingenious(x))\nforall x (Retail(x, fanya) and Naive(x) -> Coal(fanya, darius))\n\nRetail(darius, joete)\n\ntherefore Retail(darius, joete)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The lucretia live the torrence. The torrence concord the lucretia. The torrence concord the delinda. The torrence banter the lucretia. The torrence banter the delinda. The torrence live the lucretia. The torrence live the delinda. The delinda concord the lucretia. The delinda concord the torrence. The delinda is steerable. The delinda is unrealized. The delinda banter the lucretia. The delinda banter the torrence. The delinda live the lucretia. The delinda live the torrence. If someone concord the torrence then they chase the lucretia. If someone is clueless then they like the lucretia. If someone concord the torrence and they are steerable then they like the lucretia. If someone live the lucretia and they are untrue then the lucretia banter the delinda. If someone banter the delinda then they are untrue. If someone banter the lucretia and they are steerable then the lucretia live the delinda. The torrence does not need the delinda.", "logic": "\nLive(lucretia, torrence)\nConcord(torrence, lucretia)\nConcord(torrence, delinda)\nBanter(torrence, lucretia)\nBanter(torrence, delinda)\nLive(torrence, lucretia)\nLive(torrence, delinda)\nConcord(delinda, lucretia)\nConcord(delinda, torrence)\nSteerable(delinda)\nUnrealized(delinda)\nBanter(delinda, lucretia)\nBanter(delinda, torrence)\nLive(delinda, lucretia)\nLive(delinda, torrence)\nforall x (Concord(x, torrence) -> Concord(x, lucretia))\nforall x (Clueless(x) -> Banter(x, lucretia))\nforall x (Concord(x, torrence) and Steerable(x) -> Banter(x, lucretia))\nforall x (Live(x, lucretia) and Untrue(x) -> Banter(lucretia, delinda))\nforall x (Banter(x, delinda) -> Untrue(x))\nforall x (Banter(x, lucretia) and Steerable(x) -> Live(lucretia, delinda))\n\nnot Live(torrence, delinda)\n\ntherefore Live(torrence, delinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The irma trivialize the rosana. The rosana smooth the irma. The rosana smooth the marita. The rosana cradle the irma. The rosana cradle the marita. The rosana trivialize the irma. The rosana trivialize the marita. The marita smooth the irma. The marita smooth the rosana. The marita is epicurean. The marita is edified. The marita cradle the irma. The marita cradle the rosana. The marita trivialize the irma. The marita trivialize the rosana. If someone smooth the rosana then they chase the irma. If someone is umteenth then they like the irma. If someone smooth the rosana and they are epicurean then they like the irma. If someone trivialize the irma and they are inhabited then the irma cradle the marita. If someone cradle the marita then they are inhabited. If someone cradle the irma and they are epicurean then the irma trivialize the marita. The rosana is inhabited.", "logic": "\nTrivialize(irma, rosana)\nSmooth(rosana, irma)\nSmooth(rosana, marita)\nCradle(rosana, irma)\nCradle(rosana, marita)\nTrivialize(rosana, irma)\nTrivialize(rosana, marita)\nSmooth(marita, irma)\nSmooth(marita, rosana)\nEpicurean(marita)\nEdified(marita)\nCradle(marita, irma)\nCradle(marita, rosana)\nTrivialize(marita, irma)\nTrivialize(marita, rosana)\nforall x (Smooth(x, rosana) -> Smooth(x, irma))\nforall x (Umteenth(x) -> Cradle(x, irma))\nforall x (Smooth(x, rosana) and Epicurean(x) -> Cradle(x, irma))\nforall x (Trivialize(x, irma) and Inhabited(x) -> Cradle(irma, marita))\nforall x (Cradle(x, marita) -> Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Cradle(x, irma) and Epicurean(x) -> Trivialize(irma, marita))\n\nInhabited(rosana)\n\nCradle(rosana, marita) and forall x (Cradle(x, marita) -> Inhabited(x)) -> therefore Inhabited(rosana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The kriste replant the margette. The margette pulse the kriste. The margette pulse the rodney. The margette plank the kriste. The margette plank the rodney. The margette replant the kriste. The margette replant the rodney. The rodney pulse the kriste. The rodney pulse the margette. The rodney is pasted. The rodney is costumed. The rodney plank the kriste. The rodney plank the margette. The rodney replant the kriste. The rodney replant the margette. If someone pulse the margette then they chase the kriste. If someone is said then they like the kriste. If someone pulse the margette and they are pasted then they like the kriste. If someone replant the kriste and they are unfledged then the kriste plank the rodney. If someone plank the rodney then they are unfledged. If someone plank the kriste and they are pasted then the kriste replant the rodney. The kriste does not need the rodney.", "logic": "\nReplant(kriste, margette)\nPulse(margette, kriste)\nPulse(margette, rodney)\nPlank(margette, kriste)\nPlank(margette, rodney)\nReplant(margette, kriste)\nReplant(margette, rodney)\nPulse(rodney, kriste)\nPulse(rodney, margette)\nPasted(rodney)\nCostumed(rodney)\nPlank(rodney, kriste)\nPlank(rodney, margette)\nReplant(rodney, kriste)\nReplant(rodney, margette)\nforall x (Pulse(x, margette) -> Pulse(x, kriste))\nforall x (Said(x) -> Plank(x, kriste))\nforall x (Pulse(x, margette) and Pasted(x) -> Plank(x, kriste))\nforall x (Replant(x, kriste) and Unfledged(x) -> Plank(kriste, rodney))\nforall x (Plank(x, rodney) -> Unfledged(x))\nforall x (Plank(x, kriste) and Pasted(x) -> Replant(kriste, rodney))\n\nnot Replant(kriste, rodney)\n\nPlank(rodney, kriste) and Pasted(rodney) and forall x (Plank(x, kriste) and Pasted(x) -> Replant(kriste, rodney)) -> therefore Replant(kriste, rodney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The cresa invaginate the obadiah. The obadiah blister the cresa. The obadiah blister the marven. The obadiah brag the cresa. The obadiah brag the marven. The obadiah invaginate the cresa. The obadiah invaginate the marven. The marven blister the cresa. The marven blister the obadiah. The marven is fragile. The marven is ophthalmic. The marven brag the cresa. The marven brag the obadiah. The marven invaginate the cresa. The marven invaginate the obadiah. If someone blister the obadiah then they chase the cresa. If someone is brutal then they like the cresa. If someone blister the obadiah and they are fragile then they like the cresa. If someone invaginate the cresa and they are humic then the cresa brag the marven. If someone brag the marven then they are humic. If someone brag the cresa and they are fragile then the cresa invaginate the marven. The cresa brag the marven.", "logic": "\nInvaginate(cresa, obadiah)\nBlister(obadiah, cresa)\nBlister(obadiah, marven)\nBrag(obadiah, cresa)\nBrag(obadiah, marven)\nInvaginate(obadiah, cresa)\nInvaginate(obadiah, marven)\nBlister(marven, cresa)\nBlister(marven, obadiah)\nFragile(marven)\nOphthalmic(marven)\nBrag(marven, cresa)\nBrag(marven, obadiah)\nInvaginate(marven, cresa)\nInvaginate(marven, obadiah)\nforall x (Blister(x, obadiah) -> Blister(x, cresa))\nforall x (Brutal(x) -> Brag(x, cresa))\nforall x (Blister(x, obadiah) and Fragile(x) -> Brag(x, cresa))\nforall x (Invaginate(x, cresa) and Humic(x) -> Brag(cresa, marven))\nforall x (Brag(x, marven) -> Humic(x))\nforall x (Brag(x, cresa) and Fragile(x) -> Invaginate(cresa, marven))\n\nBrag(cresa, marven)\n\nBrag(obadiah, marven) and forall x (Brag(x, marven) -> Humic(x)) -> therefore Humic(obadiah) Invaginate(obadiah, cresa) and Humic(obadiah) and forall x (Invaginate(x, cresa) and Humic(x) -> Brag(cresa, marven)) -> therefore Brag(cresa, marven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The nerissa patinize the fitz. The fitz salt the nerissa. The fitz salt the elisabeth. The fitz flex the nerissa. The fitz flex the elisabeth. The fitz patinize the nerissa. The fitz patinize the elisabeth. The elisabeth salt the nerissa. The elisabeth salt the fitz. The elisabeth is deranged. The elisabeth is outbred. The elisabeth flex the nerissa. The elisabeth flex the fitz. The elisabeth patinize the nerissa. The elisabeth patinize the fitz. If someone salt the fitz then they chase the nerissa. If someone is vehicular then they like the nerissa. If someone salt the fitz and they are deranged then they like the nerissa. If someone patinize the nerissa and they are manifest then the nerissa flex the elisabeth. If someone flex the elisabeth then they are manifest. If someone flex the nerissa and they are deranged then the nerissa patinize the elisabeth. The nerissa does not like the elisabeth.", "logic": "\nPatinize(nerissa, fitz)\nSalt(fitz, nerissa)\nSalt(fitz, elisabeth)\nFlex(fitz, nerissa)\nFlex(fitz, elisabeth)\nPatinize(fitz, nerissa)\nPatinize(fitz, elisabeth)\nSalt(elisabeth, nerissa)\nSalt(elisabeth, fitz)\nDeranged(elisabeth)\nOutbred(elisabeth)\nFlex(elisabeth, nerissa)\nFlex(elisabeth, fitz)\nPatinize(elisabeth, nerissa)\nPatinize(elisabeth, fitz)\nforall x (Salt(x, fitz) -> Salt(x, nerissa))\nforall x (Vehicular(x) -> Flex(x, nerissa))\nforall x (Salt(x, fitz) and Deranged(x) -> Flex(x, nerissa))\nforall x (Patinize(x, nerissa) and Manifest(x) -> Flex(nerissa, elisabeth))\nforall x (Flex(x, elisabeth) -> Manifest(x))\nforall x (Flex(x, nerissa) and Deranged(x) -> Patinize(nerissa, elisabeth))\n\nnot Flex(nerissa, elisabeth)\n\nFlex(fitz, elisabeth) and forall x (Flex(x, elisabeth) -> Manifest(x)) -> therefore Manifest(fitz) Patinize(fitz, nerissa) and Manifest(fitz) and forall x (Patinize(x, nerissa) and Manifest(x) -> Flex(nerissa, elisabeth)) -> therefore Flex(nerissa, elisabeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The emalee lyophilize the patrick. The patrick kayak the emalee. The patrick kayak the maura. The patrick cloture the emalee. The patrick cloture the maura. The patrick lyophilize the emalee. The patrick lyophilize the maura. The maura kayak the emalee. The maura kayak the patrick. The maura is avascular. The maura is branched. The maura cloture the emalee. The maura cloture the patrick. The maura lyophilize the emalee. The maura lyophilize the patrick. If someone kayak the patrick then they chase the emalee. If someone is misbranded then they like the emalee. If someone kayak the patrick and they are avascular then they like the emalee. If someone lyophilize the emalee and they are unreserved then the emalee cloture the maura. If someone cloture the maura then they are unreserved. If someone cloture the emalee and they are avascular then the emalee lyophilize the maura. The emalee is unreserved.", "logic": "\nLyophilize(emalee, patrick)\nKayak(patrick, emalee)\nKayak(patrick, maura)\nCloture(patrick, emalee)\nCloture(patrick, maura)\nLyophilize(patrick, emalee)\nLyophilize(patrick, maura)\nKayak(maura, emalee)\nKayak(maura, patrick)\nAvascular(maura)\nBranched(maura)\nCloture(maura, emalee)\nCloture(maura, patrick)\nLyophilize(maura, emalee)\nLyophilize(maura, patrick)\nforall x (Kayak(x, patrick) -> Kayak(x, emalee))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) -> Cloture(x, emalee))\nforall x (Kayak(x, patrick) and Avascular(x) -> Cloture(x, emalee))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, emalee) and Unreserved(x) -> Cloture(emalee, maura))\nforall x (Cloture(x, maura) -> Unreserved(x))\nforall x (Cloture(x, emalee) and Avascular(x) -> Lyophilize(emalee, maura))\n\nUnreserved(emalee)\n\nCloture(patrick, maura) and forall x (Cloture(x, maura) -> Unreserved(x)) -> therefore Unreserved(patrick) Lyophilize(patrick, emalee) and Unreserved(patrick) and forall x (Lyophilize(x, emalee) and Unreserved(x) -> Cloture(emalee, maura)) -> therefore Cloture(emalee, maura) Cloture(emalee, maura) and forall x (Cloture(x, maura) -> Unreserved(x)) -> therefore Unreserved(emalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The courtenay depict the giavani. The giavani bestrew the courtenay. The giavani bestrew the syd. The giavani befuddle the courtenay. The giavani befuddle the syd. The giavani depict the courtenay. The giavani depict the syd. The syd bestrew the courtenay. The syd bestrew the giavani. The syd is hammered. The syd is dendritic. The syd befuddle the courtenay. The syd befuddle the giavani. The syd depict the courtenay. The syd depict the giavani. If someone bestrew the giavani then they chase the courtenay. If someone is prostrate then they like the courtenay. If someone bestrew the giavani and they are hammered then they like the courtenay. If someone depict the courtenay and they are abrupt then the courtenay befuddle the syd. If someone befuddle the syd then they are abrupt. If someone befuddle the courtenay and they are hammered then the courtenay depict the syd. The courtenay is not abrupt.", "logic": "\nDepict(courtenay, giavani)\nBestrew(giavani, courtenay)\nBestrew(giavani, syd)\nBefuddle(giavani, courtenay)\nBefuddle(giavani, syd)\nDepict(giavani, courtenay)\nDepict(giavani, syd)\nBestrew(syd, courtenay)\nBestrew(syd, giavani)\nHammered(syd)\nDendritic(syd)\nBefuddle(syd, courtenay)\nBefuddle(syd, giavani)\nDepict(syd, courtenay)\nDepict(syd, giavani)\nforall x (Bestrew(x, giavani) -> Bestrew(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Prostrate(x) -> Befuddle(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Bestrew(x, giavani) and Hammered(x) -> Befuddle(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Depict(x, courtenay) and Abrupt(x) -> Befuddle(courtenay, syd))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, syd) -> Abrupt(x))\nforall x (Befuddle(x, courtenay) and Hammered(x) -> Depict(courtenay, syd))\n\nnot Abrupt(courtenay)\n\nBefuddle(giavani, syd) and forall x (Befuddle(x, syd) -> Abrupt(x)) -> therefore Abrupt(giavani) Depict(giavani, courtenay) and Abrupt(giavani) and forall x (Depict(x, courtenay) and Abrupt(x) -> Befuddle(courtenay, syd)) -> therefore Befuddle(courtenay, syd) Befuddle(courtenay, syd) and forall x (Befuddle(x, syd) -> Abrupt(x)) -> therefore Abrupt(courtenay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The guenna sulfur the dorcas. The dorcas census the guenna. The dorcas census the sheri. The dorcas slack the guenna. The dorcas slack the sheri. The dorcas sulfur the guenna. The dorcas sulfur the sheri. The sheri census the guenna. The sheri census the dorcas. The sheri is cuspidate. The sheri is blowzy. The sheri slack the guenna. The sheri slack the dorcas. The sheri sulfur the guenna. The sheri sulfur the dorcas. If someone census the dorcas then they chase the guenna. If someone is ungrudging then they like the guenna. If someone census the dorcas and they are cuspidate then they like the guenna. If someone sulfur the guenna and they are rodlike then the guenna slack the sheri. If someone slack the sheri then they are rodlike. If someone slack the guenna and they are cuspidate then the guenna sulfur the sheri. The guenna does not like the guenna.", "logic": "\nSulfur(guenna, dorcas)\nCensus(dorcas, guenna)\nCensus(dorcas, sheri)\nSlack(dorcas, guenna)\nSlack(dorcas, sheri)\nSulfur(dorcas, guenna)\nSulfur(dorcas, sheri)\nCensus(sheri, guenna)\nCensus(sheri, dorcas)\nCuspidate(sheri)\nBlowzy(sheri)\nSlack(sheri, guenna)\nSlack(sheri, dorcas)\nSulfur(sheri, guenna)\nSulfur(sheri, dorcas)\nforall x (Census(x, dorcas) -> Census(x, guenna))\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) -> Slack(x, guenna))\nforall x (Census(x, dorcas) and Cuspidate(x) -> Slack(x, guenna))\nforall x (Sulfur(x, guenna) and Rodlike(x) -> Slack(guenna, sheri))\nforall x (Slack(x, sheri) -> Rodlike(x))\nforall x (Slack(x, guenna) and Cuspidate(x) -> Sulfur(guenna, sheri))\n\nnot Slack(guenna, guenna)\n\nforall x (Ungrudging(x) -> Slack(x, guenna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The tomkin mechanize the queada. The queada withstand the tomkin. The queada withstand the jaquith. The queada compel the tomkin. The queada compel the jaquith. The queada mechanize the tomkin. The queada mechanize the jaquith. The jaquith withstand the tomkin. The jaquith withstand the queada. The jaquith is luckless. The jaquith is hardfisted. The jaquith compel the tomkin. The jaquith compel the queada. The jaquith mechanize the tomkin. The jaquith mechanize the queada. If someone withstand the queada then they chase the tomkin. If someone is gummy then they like the tomkin. If someone withstand the queada and they are luckless then they like the tomkin. If someone mechanize the tomkin and they are niffy then the tomkin compel the jaquith. If someone compel the jaquith then they are niffy. If someone compel the tomkin and they are luckless then the tomkin mechanize the jaquith. The tomkin withstand the tomkin.", "logic": "\nMechanize(tomkin, queada)\nWithstand(queada, tomkin)\nWithstand(queada, jaquith)\nCompel(queada, tomkin)\nCompel(queada, jaquith)\nMechanize(queada, tomkin)\nMechanize(queada, jaquith)\nWithstand(jaquith, tomkin)\nWithstand(jaquith, queada)\nLuckless(jaquith)\nHardfisted(jaquith)\nCompel(jaquith, tomkin)\nCompel(jaquith, queada)\nMechanize(jaquith, tomkin)\nMechanize(jaquith, queada)\nforall x (Withstand(x, queada) -> Withstand(x, tomkin))\nforall x (Gummy(x) -> Compel(x, tomkin))\nforall x (Withstand(x, queada) and Luckless(x) -> Compel(x, tomkin))\nforall x (Mechanize(x, tomkin) and Niffy(x) -> Compel(tomkin, jaquith))\nforall x (Compel(x, jaquith) -> Niffy(x))\nforall x (Compel(x, tomkin) and Luckless(x) -> Mechanize(tomkin, jaquith))\n\nWithstand(tomkin, tomkin)\n\nforall x (Withstand(x, queada) -> Withstand(x, tomkin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The francene unmask the collins. The collins unwire the francene. The collins unwire the bryn. The collins snoop the francene. The collins snoop the bryn. The collins unmask the francene. The collins unmask the bryn. The bryn unwire the francene. The bryn unwire the collins. The bryn is fraternal. The bryn is reasoning. The bryn snoop the francene. The bryn snoop the collins. The bryn unmask the francene. The bryn unmask the collins. If someone unwire the collins then they chase the francene. If someone is outlawed then they like the francene. If someone unwire the collins and they are fraternal then they like the francene. If someone unmask the francene and they are fulgent then the francene snoop the bryn. If someone snoop the bryn then they are fulgent. If someone snoop the francene and they are fraternal then the francene unmask the bryn. The bryn is not fulgent.", "logic": "\nUnmask(francene, collins)\nUnwire(collins, francene)\nUnwire(collins, bryn)\nSnoop(collins, francene)\nSnoop(collins, bryn)\nUnmask(collins, francene)\nUnmask(collins, bryn)\nUnwire(bryn, francene)\nUnwire(bryn, collins)\nFraternal(bryn)\nReasoning(bryn)\nSnoop(bryn, francene)\nSnoop(bryn, collins)\nUnmask(bryn, francene)\nUnmask(bryn, collins)\nforall x (Unwire(x, collins) -> Unwire(x, francene))\nforall x (Outlawed(x) -> Snoop(x, francene))\nforall x (Unwire(x, collins) and Fraternal(x) -> Snoop(x, francene))\nforall x (Unmask(x, francene) and Fulgent(x) -> Snoop(francene, bryn))\nforall x (Snoop(x, bryn) -> Fulgent(x))\nforall x (Snoop(x, francene) and Fraternal(x) -> Unmask(francene, bryn))\n\nnot Fulgent(bryn)\n\nforall x (Snoop(x, bryn) -> Fulgent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The fletcher modernise the ethelyn. The ethelyn mine the fletcher. The ethelyn mine the walter. The ethelyn occlude the fletcher. The ethelyn occlude the walter. The ethelyn modernise the fletcher. The ethelyn modernise the walter. The walter mine the fletcher. The walter mine the ethelyn. The walter is banausic. The walter is localized. The walter occlude the fletcher. The walter occlude the ethelyn. The walter modernise the fletcher. The walter modernise the ethelyn. If someone mine the ethelyn then they chase the fletcher. If someone is ascendant then they like the fletcher. If someone mine the ethelyn and they are banausic then they like the fletcher. If someone modernise the fletcher and they are tabu then the fletcher occlude the walter. If someone occlude the walter then they are tabu. If someone occlude the fletcher and they are banausic then the fletcher modernise the walter. The ethelyn is banausic.", "logic": "\nModernise(fletcher, ethelyn)\nMine(ethelyn, fletcher)\nMine(ethelyn, walter)\nOcclude(ethelyn, fletcher)\nOcclude(ethelyn, walter)\nModernise(ethelyn, fletcher)\nModernise(ethelyn, walter)\nMine(walter, fletcher)\nMine(walter, ethelyn)\nBanausic(walter)\nLocalized(walter)\nOcclude(walter, fletcher)\nOcclude(walter, ethelyn)\nModernise(walter, fletcher)\nModernise(walter, ethelyn)\nforall x (Mine(x, ethelyn) -> Mine(x, fletcher))\nforall x (Ascendant(x) -> Occlude(x, fletcher))\nforall x (Mine(x, ethelyn) and Banausic(x) -> Occlude(x, fletcher))\nforall x (Modernise(x, fletcher) and Tabu(x) -> Occlude(fletcher, walter))\nforall x (Occlude(x, walter) -> Tabu(x))\nforall x (Occlude(x, fletcher) and Banausic(x) -> Modernise(fletcher, walter))\n\nBanausic(ethelyn)\n\nBanausic(ethelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The gabriele recline the kori. The kori colonise the gabriele. The kori colonise the viv. The kori diagram the gabriele. The kori diagram the viv. The kori recline the gabriele. The kori recline the viv. The viv colonise the gabriele. The viv colonise the kori. The viv is backswept. The viv is pretty. The viv diagram the gabriele. The viv diagram the kori. The viv recline the gabriele. The viv recline the kori. If someone colonise the kori then they chase the gabriele. If someone is utile then they like the gabriele. If someone colonise the kori and they are backswept then they like the gabriele. If someone recline the gabriele and they are sevenfold then the gabriele diagram the viv. If someone diagram the viv then they are sevenfold. If someone diagram the gabriele and they are backswept then the gabriele recline the viv. The viv is not green.", "logic": "\nRecline(gabriele, kori)\nColonise(kori, gabriele)\nColonise(kori, viv)\nDiagram(kori, gabriele)\nDiagram(kori, viv)\nRecline(kori, gabriele)\nRecline(kori, viv)\nColonise(viv, gabriele)\nColonise(viv, kori)\nBackswept(viv)\nPretty(viv)\nDiagram(viv, gabriele)\nDiagram(viv, kori)\nRecline(viv, gabriele)\nRecline(viv, kori)\nforall x (Colonise(x, kori) -> Colonise(x, gabriele))\nforall x (Utile(x) -> Diagram(x, gabriele))\nforall x (Colonise(x, kori) and Backswept(x) -> Diagram(x, gabriele))\nforall x (Recline(x, gabriele) and Sevenfold(x) -> Diagram(gabriele, viv))\nforall x (Diagram(x, viv) -> Sevenfold(x))\nforall x (Diagram(x, gabriele) and Backswept(x) -> Recline(gabriele, viv))\n\nnot Green(viv)\n\nnot Green(viv) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The andreana splint the emlyn. The emlyn impose the andreana. The emlyn impose the sancho. The emlyn ratchet the andreana. The emlyn ratchet the sancho. The emlyn splint the andreana. The emlyn splint the sancho. The sancho impose the andreana. The sancho impose the emlyn. The sancho is broken. The sancho is teary. The sancho ratchet the andreana. The sancho ratchet the emlyn. The sancho splint the andreana. The sancho splint the emlyn. If someone impose the emlyn then they chase the andreana. If someone is pyloric then they like the andreana. If someone impose the emlyn and they are broken then they like the andreana. If someone splint the andreana and they are secretive then the andreana ratchet the sancho. If someone ratchet the sancho then they are secretive. If someone ratchet the andreana and they are broken then the andreana splint the sancho. The andreana is green.", "logic": "\nSplint(andreana, emlyn)\nImpose(emlyn, andreana)\nImpose(emlyn, sancho)\nRatchet(emlyn, andreana)\nRatchet(emlyn, sancho)\nSplint(emlyn, andreana)\nSplint(emlyn, sancho)\nImpose(sancho, andreana)\nImpose(sancho, emlyn)\nBroken(sancho)\nTeary(sancho)\nRatchet(sancho, andreana)\nRatchet(sancho, emlyn)\nSplint(sancho, andreana)\nSplint(sancho, emlyn)\nforall x (Impose(x, emlyn) -> Impose(x, andreana))\nforall x (Pyloric(x) -> Ratchet(x, andreana))\nforall x (Impose(x, emlyn) and Broken(x) -> Ratchet(x, andreana))\nforall x (Splint(x, andreana) and Secretive(x) -> Ratchet(andreana, sancho))\nforall x (Ratchet(x, sancho) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Ratchet(x, andreana) and Broken(x) -> Splint(andreana, sancho))\n\nGreen(andreana)\n\nGreen(andreana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The vernice revise the abigael. The abigael manducate the vernice. The abigael manducate the bjorn. The abigael gorge the vernice. The abigael gorge the bjorn. The abigael revise the vernice. The abigael revise the bjorn. The bjorn manducate the vernice. The bjorn manducate the abigael. The bjorn is judicable. The bjorn is acinic. The bjorn gorge the vernice. The bjorn gorge the abigael. The bjorn revise the vernice. The bjorn revise the abigael. If someone manducate the abigael then they chase the vernice. If someone is pursued then they like the vernice. If someone manducate the abigael and they are judicable then they like the vernice. If someone revise the vernice and they are incertain then the vernice gorge the bjorn. If someone gorge the bjorn then they are incertain. If someone gorge the vernice and they are judicable then the vernice revise the bjorn. The abigael does not chase the abigael.", "logic": "\nRevise(vernice, abigael)\nManducate(abigael, vernice)\nManducate(abigael, bjorn)\nGorge(abigael, vernice)\nGorge(abigael, bjorn)\nRevise(abigael, vernice)\nRevise(abigael, bjorn)\nManducate(bjorn, vernice)\nManducate(bjorn, abigael)\nJudicable(bjorn)\nAcinic(bjorn)\nGorge(bjorn, vernice)\nGorge(bjorn, abigael)\nRevise(bjorn, vernice)\nRevise(bjorn, abigael)\nforall x (Manducate(x, abigael) -> Manducate(x, vernice))\nforall x (Pursued(x) -> Gorge(x, vernice))\nforall x (Manducate(x, abigael) and Judicable(x) -> Gorge(x, vernice))\nforall x (Revise(x, vernice) and Incertain(x) -> Gorge(vernice, bjorn))\nforall x (Gorge(x, bjorn) -> Incertain(x))\nforall x (Gorge(x, vernice) and Judicable(x) -> Revise(vernice, bjorn))\n\nnot Manducate(abigael, abigael)\n\nnot Manducate(abigael, abigael) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The marney unitize the chadd. The chadd clone the marney. The chadd clone the redford. The chadd flatter the marney. The chadd flatter the redford. The chadd unitize the marney. The chadd unitize the redford. The redford clone the marney. The redford clone the chadd. The redford is scurfy. The redford is humorous. The redford flatter the marney. The redford flatter the chadd. The redford unitize the marney. The redford unitize the chadd. If someone clone the chadd then they chase the marney. If someone is intimal then they like the marney. If someone clone the chadd and they are scurfy then they like the marney. If someone unitize the marney and they are stripy then the marney flatter the redford. If someone flatter the redford then they are stripy. If someone flatter the marney and they are scurfy then the marney unitize the redford. The redford clone the redford.", "logic": "\nUnitize(marney, chadd)\nClone(chadd, marney)\nClone(chadd, redford)\nFlatter(chadd, marney)\nFlatter(chadd, redford)\nUnitize(chadd, marney)\nUnitize(chadd, redford)\nClone(redford, marney)\nClone(redford, chadd)\nScurfy(redford)\nHumorous(redford)\nFlatter(redford, marney)\nFlatter(redford, chadd)\nUnitize(redford, marney)\nUnitize(redford, chadd)\nforall x (Clone(x, chadd) -> Clone(x, marney))\nforall x (Intimal(x) -> Flatter(x, marney))\nforall x (Clone(x, chadd) and Scurfy(x) -> Flatter(x, marney))\nforall x (Unitize(x, marney) and Stripy(x) -> Flatter(marney, redford))\nforall x (Flatter(x, redford) -> Stripy(x))\nforall x (Flatter(x, marney) and Scurfy(x) -> Unitize(marney, redford))\n\nClone(redford, redford)\n\nClone(redford, redford) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-170"} {"premises": "The kiah desolate the dulcinea. The kiah is not yankee. The kiah is smoky. The kiah is not shattered. The kiah is bony. The kiah is excretory. The kiah swill the dulcinea. The kiah calm the dulcinea. The dulcinea is shattered. The dulcinea is bony. The dulcinea swill the kiah. The dulcinea calm the kiah. If something calm the dulcinea and the dulcinea calm the kiah then it swill the dulcinea. If something is shattered and yankee then it does not need the dulcinea. If something swill the dulcinea then the dulcinea is excretory. If the dulcinea is bony and the dulcinea desolate the kiah then the dulcinea is not smoky. If something calm the kiah and the kiah does not need the dulcinea then the kiah swill the dulcinea. If something is excretory then it desolate the kiah. The kiah is excretory.", "logic": "\nDesolate(kiah, dulcinea)\nnot Yankee(kiah)\nSmoky(kiah)\nnot Shattered(kiah)\nBony(kiah)\nExcretory(kiah)\nSwill(kiah, dulcinea)\nCalm(kiah, dulcinea)\nShattered(dulcinea)\nBony(dulcinea)\nSwill(dulcinea, kiah)\nCalm(dulcinea, kiah)\nforall x (Calm(x, dulcinea) and Calm(dulcinea, kiah) -> Swill(x, dulcinea))\nforall x (Shattered(x) and Yankee(x) -> not Calm(x, dulcinea))\nforall x (Swill(x, dulcinea) -> Excretory(dulcinea))\nBony(dulcinea) and Desolate(dulcinea, kiah) -> not Smoky(dulcinea)\nforall x (Calm(x, kiah) and not Calm(kiah, dulcinea) -> Swill(kiah, dulcinea))\nforall x (Excretory(x) -> Desolate(x, kiah))\n\nExcretory(kiah)\n\ntherefore Excretory(kiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The cybill convene the florice. The cybill is not slapstick. The cybill is tomentous. The cybill is not interwoven. The cybill is midweekly. The cybill is dignified. The cybill jack the florice. The cybill raiment the florice. The florice is interwoven. The florice is midweekly. The florice jack the cybill. The florice raiment the cybill. If something raiment the florice and the florice raiment the cybill then it jack the florice. If something is interwoven and slapstick then it does not need the florice. If something jack the florice then the florice is dignified. If the florice is midweekly and the florice convene the cybill then the florice is not tomentous. If something raiment the cybill and the cybill does not need the florice then the cybill jack the florice. If something is dignified then it convene the cybill. The cybill is slapstick.", "logic": "\nConvene(cybill, florice)\nnot Slapstick(cybill)\nTomentous(cybill)\nnot Interwoven(cybill)\nMidweekly(cybill)\nDignified(cybill)\nJack(cybill, florice)\nRaiment(cybill, florice)\nInterwoven(florice)\nMidweekly(florice)\nJack(florice, cybill)\nRaiment(florice, cybill)\nforall x (Raiment(x, florice) and Raiment(florice, cybill) -> Jack(x, florice))\nforall x (Interwoven(x) and Slapstick(x) -> not Raiment(x, florice))\nforall x (Jack(x, florice) -> Dignified(florice))\nMidweekly(florice) and Convene(florice, cybill) -> not Tomentous(florice)\nforall x (Raiment(x, cybill) and not Raiment(cybill, florice) -> Jack(cybill, florice))\nforall x (Dignified(x) -> Convene(x, cybill))\n\nSlapstick(cybill)\n\ntherefore not Slapstick(cybill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The benjie recede the geraldine. The benjie is not afloat. The benjie is callow. The benjie is not digital. The benjie is idiomatic. The benjie is gory. The benjie confiscate the geraldine. The benjie abjure the geraldine. The geraldine is digital. The geraldine is idiomatic. The geraldine confiscate the benjie. The geraldine abjure the benjie. If something abjure the geraldine and the geraldine abjure the benjie then it confiscate the geraldine. If something is digital and afloat then it does not need the geraldine. If something confiscate the geraldine then the geraldine is gory. If the geraldine is idiomatic and the geraldine recede the benjie then the geraldine is not callow. If something abjure the benjie and the benjie does not need the geraldine then the benjie confiscate the geraldine. If something is gory then it recede the benjie. The benjie recede the benjie.", "logic": "\nRecede(benjie, geraldine)\nnot Afloat(benjie)\nCallow(benjie)\nnot Digital(benjie)\nIdiomatic(benjie)\nGory(benjie)\nConfiscate(benjie, geraldine)\nAbjure(benjie, geraldine)\nDigital(geraldine)\nIdiomatic(geraldine)\nConfiscate(geraldine, benjie)\nAbjure(geraldine, benjie)\nforall x (Abjure(x, geraldine) and Abjure(geraldine, benjie) -> Confiscate(x, geraldine))\nforall x (Digital(x) and Afloat(x) -> not Abjure(x, geraldine))\nforall x (Confiscate(x, geraldine) -> Gory(geraldine))\nIdiomatic(geraldine) and Recede(geraldine, benjie) -> not Callow(geraldine)\nforall x (Abjure(x, benjie) and not Abjure(benjie, geraldine) -> Confiscate(benjie, geraldine))\nforall x (Gory(x) -> Recede(x, benjie))\n\nRecede(benjie, benjie)\n\nGory(benjie) and forall x (Gory(x) -> Recede(x, benjie)) -> therefore Recede(benjie, benjie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The jill boom the parwane. The jill is not girlish. The jill is edentate. The jill is not wicked. The jill is acinous. The jill is wormy. The jill position the parwane. The jill defraud the parwane. The parwane is wicked. The parwane is acinous. The parwane position the jill. The parwane defraud the jill. If something defraud the parwane and the parwane defraud the jill then it position the parwane. If something is wicked and girlish then it does not need the parwane. If something position the parwane then the parwane is wormy. If the parwane is acinous and the parwane boom the jill then the parwane is not edentate. If something defraud the jill and the jill does not need the parwane then the jill position the parwane. If something is wormy then it boom the jill. The jill does not chase the jill.", "logic": "\nBoom(jill, parwane)\nnot Girlish(jill)\nEdentate(jill)\nnot Wicked(jill)\nAcinous(jill)\nWormy(jill)\nPosition(jill, parwane)\nDefraud(jill, parwane)\nWicked(parwane)\nAcinous(parwane)\nPosition(parwane, jill)\nDefraud(parwane, jill)\nforall x (Defraud(x, parwane) and Defraud(parwane, jill) -> Position(x, parwane))\nforall x (Wicked(x) and Girlish(x) -> not Defraud(x, parwane))\nforall x (Position(x, parwane) -> Wormy(parwane))\nAcinous(parwane) and Boom(parwane, jill) -> not Edentate(parwane)\nforall x (Defraud(x, jill) and not Defraud(jill, parwane) -> Position(jill, parwane))\nforall x (Wormy(x) -> Boom(x, jill))\n\nnot Boom(jill, jill)\n\nWormy(jill) and forall x (Wormy(x) -> Boom(x, jill)) -> therefore Boom(jill, jill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The malka fondle the veronica. The malka is not fatherless. The malka is megalithic. The malka is not colourful. The malka is viennese. The malka is secondary. The malka guarantee the veronica. The malka vacate the veronica. The veronica is colourful. The veronica is viennese. The veronica guarantee the malka. The veronica vacate the malka. If something vacate the veronica and the veronica vacate the malka then it guarantee the veronica. If something is colourful and fatherless then it does not need the veronica. If something guarantee the veronica then the veronica is secondary. If the veronica is viennese and the veronica fondle the malka then the veronica is not megalithic. If something vacate the malka and the malka does not need the veronica then the malka guarantee the veronica. If something is secondary then it fondle the malka. The veronica fondle the malka.", "logic": "\nFondle(malka, veronica)\nnot Fatherless(malka)\nMegalithic(malka)\nnot Colourful(malka)\nViennese(malka)\nSecondary(malka)\nGuarantee(malka, veronica)\nVacate(malka, veronica)\nColourful(veronica)\nViennese(veronica)\nGuarantee(veronica, malka)\nVacate(veronica, malka)\nforall x (Vacate(x, veronica) and Vacate(veronica, malka) -> Guarantee(x, veronica))\nforall x (Colourful(x) and Fatherless(x) -> not Vacate(x, veronica))\nforall x (Guarantee(x, veronica) -> Secondary(veronica))\nViennese(veronica) and Fondle(veronica, malka) -> not Megalithic(veronica)\nforall x (Vacate(x, malka) and not Vacate(malka, veronica) -> Guarantee(malka, veronica))\nforall x (Secondary(x) -> Fondle(x, malka))\n\nFondle(veronica, malka)\n\nGuarantee(malka, veronica) and forall x (Guarantee(x, veronica) -> Secondary(veronica)) -> therefore Secondary(veronica) Secondary(veronica) and forall x (Secondary(x) -> Fondle(x, malka)) -> therefore Fondle(veronica, malka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The nilson topicalize the piotr. The nilson is not seaward. The nilson is dental. The nilson is not tomentose. The nilson is egoistic. The nilson is aggravated. The nilson premier the piotr. The nilson alkalize the piotr. The piotr is tomentose. The piotr is egoistic. The piotr premier the nilson. The piotr alkalize the nilson. If something alkalize the piotr and the piotr alkalize the nilson then it premier the piotr. If something is tomentose and seaward then it does not need the piotr. If something premier the piotr then the piotr is aggravated. If the piotr is egoistic and the piotr topicalize the nilson then the piotr is not dental. If something alkalize the nilson and the nilson does not need the piotr then the nilson premier the piotr. If something is aggravated then it topicalize the nilson. The piotr does not chase the nilson.", "logic": "\nTopicalize(nilson, piotr)\nnot Seaward(nilson)\nDental(nilson)\nnot Tomentose(nilson)\nEgoistic(nilson)\nAggravated(nilson)\nPremier(nilson, piotr)\nAlkalize(nilson, piotr)\nTomentose(piotr)\nEgoistic(piotr)\nPremier(piotr, nilson)\nAlkalize(piotr, nilson)\nforall x (Alkalize(x, piotr) and Alkalize(piotr, nilson) -> Premier(x, piotr))\nforall x (Tomentose(x) and Seaward(x) -> not Alkalize(x, piotr))\nforall x (Premier(x, piotr) -> Aggravated(piotr))\nEgoistic(piotr) and Topicalize(piotr, nilson) -> not Dental(piotr)\nforall x (Alkalize(x, nilson) and not Alkalize(nilson, piotr) -> Premier(nilson, piotr))\nforall x (Aggravated(x) -> Topicalize(x, nilson))\n\nnot Topicalize(piotr, nilson)\n\nPremier(nilson, piotr) and forall x (Premier(x, piotr) -> Aggravated(piotr)) -> therefore Aggravated(piotr) Aggravated(piotr) and forall x (Aggravated(x) -> Topicalize(x, nilson)) -> therefore Topicalize(piotr, nilson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The genna brominate the lorry. The genna is not unplayable. The genna is blamable. The genna is not palmlike. The genna is delimited. The genna is obscure. The genna homologise the lorry. The genna enfeeble the lorry. The lorry is palmlike. The lorry is delimited. The lorry homologise the genna. The lorry enfeeble the genna. If something enfeeble the lorry and the lorry enfeeble the genna then it homologise the lorry. If something is palmlike and unplayable then it does not need the lorry. If something homologise the lorry then the lorry is obscure. If the lorry is delimited and the lorry brominate the genna then the lorry is not blamable. If something enfeeble the genna and the genna does not need the lorry then the genna homologise the lorry. If something is obscure then it brominate the genna. The lorry is not blamable.", "logic": "\nBrominate(genna, lorry)\nnot Unplayable(genna)\nBlamable(genna)\nnot Palmlike(genna)\nDelimited(genna)\nObscure(genna)\nHomologise(genna, lorry)\nEnfeeble(genna, lorry)\nPalmlike(lorry)\nDelimited(lorry)\nHomologise(lorry, genna)\nEnfeeble(lorry, genna)\nforall x (Enfeeble(x, lorry) and Enfeeble(lorry, genna) -> Homologise(x, lorry))\nforall x (Palmlike(x) and Unplayable(x) -> not Enfeeble(x, lorry))\nforall x (Homologise(x, lorry) -> Obscure(lorry))\nDelimited(lorry) and Brominate(lorry, genna) -> not Blamable(lorry)\nforall x (Enfeeble(x, genna) and not Enfeeble(genna, lorry) -> Homologise(genna, lorry))\nforall x (Obscure(x) -> Brominate(x, genna))\n\nnot Blamable(lorry)\n\nHomologise(genna, lorry) and forall x (Homologise(x, lorry) -> Obscure(lorry)) -> therefore Obscure(lorry) Obscure(lorry) and forall x (Obscure(x) -> Brominate(x, genna)) -> therefore Brominate(lorry, genna) Delimited(lorry) and Brominate(lorry, genna) and Delimited(lorry) and Brominate(lorry, genna) -> not Blamable(lorry) -> therefore not Blamable(lorry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The sonni animise the devin. The sonni is not knobby. The sonni is singing. The sonni is not dendriform. The sonni is singular. The sonni is hittite. The sonni operate the devin. The sonni scare the devin. The devin is dendriform. The devin is singular. The devin operate the sonni. The devin scare the sonni. If something scare the devin and the devin scare the sonni then it operate the devin. If something is dendriform and knobby then it does not need the devin. If something operate the devin then the devin is hittite. If the devin is singular and the devin animise the sonni then the devin is not singing. If something scare the sonni and the sonni does not need the devin then the sonni operate the devin. If something is hittite then it animise the sonni. The devin is singing.", "logic": "\nAnimise(sonni, devin)\nnot Knobby(sonni)\nSinging(sonni)\nnot Dendriform(sonni)\nSingular(sonni)\nHittite(sonni)\nOperate(sonni, devin)\nScare(sonni, devin)\nDendriform(devin)\nSingular(devin)\nOperate(devin, sonni)\nScare(devin, sonni)\nforall x (Scare(x, devin) and Scare(devin, sonni) -> Operate(x, devin))\nforall x (Dendriform(x) and Knobby(x) -> not Scare(x, devin))\nforall x (Operate(x, devin) -> Hittite(devin))\nSingular(devin) and Animise(devin, sonni) -> not Singing(devin)\nforall x (Scare(x, sonni) and not Scare(sonni, devin) -> Operate(sonni, devin))\nforall x (Hittite(x) -> Animise(x, sonni))\n\nSinging(devin)\n\nOperate(sonni, devin) and forall x (Operate(x, devin) -> Hittite(devin)) -> therefore Hittite(devin) Hittite(devin) and forall x (Hittite(x) -> Animise(x, sonni)) -> therefore Animise(devin, sonni) Singular(devin) and Animise(devin, sonni) and Singular(devin) and Animise(devin, sonni) -> not Singing(devin) -> therefore not Singing(devin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The lefty purify the eli. The lefty is not looseleaf. The lefty is amebic. The lefty is not astonished. The lefty is inflowing. The lefty is midwestern. The lefty postmark the eli. The lefty demobilize the eli. The eli is astonished. The eli is inflowing. The eli postmark the lefty. The eli demobilize the lefty. If something demobilize the eli and the eli demobilize the lefty then it postmark the eli. If something is astonished and looseleaf then it does not need the eli. If something postmark the eli then the eli is midwestern. If the eli is inflowing and the eli purify the lefty then the eli is not amebic. If something demobilize the lefty and the lefty does not need the eli then the lefty postmark the eli. If something is midwestern then it purify the lefty. The eli does not like the eli.", "logic": "\nPurify(lefty, eli)\nnot Looseleaf(lefty)\nAmebic(lefty)\nnot Astonished(lefty)\nInflowing(lefty)\nMidwestern(lefty)\nPostmark(lefty, eli)\nDemobilize(lefty, eli)\nAstonished(eli)\nInflowing(eli)\nPostmark(eli, lefty)\nDemobilize(eli, lefty)\nforall x (Demobilize(x, eli) and Demobilize(eli, lefty) -> Postmark(x, eli))\nforall x (Astonished(x) and Looseleaf(x) -> not Demobilize(x, eli))\nforall x (Postmark(x, eli) -> Midwestern(eli))\nInflowing(eli) and Purify(eli, lefty) -> not Amebic(eli)\nforall x (Demobilize(x, lefty) and not Demobilize(lefty, eli) -> Postmark(lefty, eli))\nforall x (Midwestern(x) -> Purify(x, lefty))\n\nnot Postmark(eli, eli)\n\nforall x (Demobilize(x, eli) and Demobilize(eli, lefty) -> Postmark(x, eli)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The brigitte chatter the eirena. The brigitte is not hale. The brigitte is crippling. The brigitte is not capillary. The brigitte is handless. The brigitte is austral. The brigitte massage the eirena. The brigitte honeycomb the eirena. The eirena is capillary. The eirena is handless. The eirena massage the brigitte. The eirena honeycomb the brigitte. If something honeycomb the eirena and the eirena honeycomb the brigitte then it massage the eirena. If something is capillary and hale then it does not need the eirena. If something massage the eirena then the eirena is austral. If the eirena is handless and the eirena chatter the brigitte then the eirena is not crippling. If something honeycomb the brigitte and the brigitte does not need the eirena then the brigitte massage the eirena. If something is austral then it chatter the brigitte. The eirena honeycomb the eirena.", "logic": "\nChatter(brigitte, eirena)\nnot Hale(brigitte)\nCrippling(brigitte)\nnot Capillary(brigitte)\nHandless(brigitte)\nAustral(brigitte)\nMassage(brigitte, eirena)\nHoneycomb(brigitte, eirena)\nCapillary(eirena)\nHandless(eirena)\nMassage(eirena, brigitte)\nHoneycomb(eirena, brigitte)\nforall x (Honeycomb(x, eirena) and Honeycomb(eirena, brigitte) -> Massage(x, eirena))\nforall x (Capillary(x) and Hale(x) -> not Honeycomb(x, eirena))\nforall x (Massage(x, eirena) -> Austral(eirena))\nHandless(eirena) and Chatter(eirena, brigitte) -> not Crippling(eirena)\nforall x (Honeycomb(x, brigitte) and not Honeycomb(brigitte, eirena) -> Massage(brigitte, eirena))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Chatter(x, brigitte))\n\nHoneycomb(eirena, eirena)\n\nHoneycomb(eirena, eirena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The lucine queue the sergei. The lucine is not nitrous. The lucine is haggard. The lucine is not crass. The lucine is faithful. The lucine is monoclonal. The lucine mellow the sergei. The lucine scroll the sergei. The sergei is crass. The sergei is faithful. The sergei mellow the lucine. The sergei scroll the lucine. If something scroll the sergei and the sergei scroll the lucine then it mellow the sergei. If something is crass and nitrous then it does not need the sergei. If something mellow the sergei then the sergei is monoclonal. If the sergei is faithful and the sergei queue the lucine then the sergei is not haggard. If something scroll the lucine and the lucine does not need the sergei then the lucine mellow the sergei. If something is monoclonal then it queue the lucine. The sergei does not chase the sergei.", "logic": "\nQueue(lucine, sergei)\nnot Nitrous(lucine)\nHaggard(lucine)\nnot Crass(lucine)\nFaithful(lucine)\nMonoclonal(lucine)\nMellow(lucine, sergei)\nScroll(lucine, sergei)\nCrass(sergei)\nFaithful(sergei)\nMellow(sergei, lucine)\nScroll(sergei, lucine)\nforall x (Scroll(x, sergei) and Scroll(sergei, lucine) -> Mellow(x, sergei))\nforall x (Crass(x) and Nitrous(x) -> not Scroll(x, sergei))\nforall x (Mellow(x, sergei) -> Monoclonal(sergei))\nFaithful(sergei) and Queue(sergei, lucine) -> not Haggard(sergei)\nforall x (Scroll(x, lucine) and not Scroll(lucine, sergei) -> Mellow(lucine, sergei))\nforall x (Monoclonal(x) -> Queue(x, lucine))\n\nnot Queue(sergei, sergei)\n\nnot Queue(sergei, sergei) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The barrie vibrate the ephram. The barrie is not hesperian. The barrie is nameless. The barrie is not devoid. The barrie is promising. The barrie is pulverised. The barrie lactate the ephram. The barrie snowshoe the ephram. The ephram is devoid. The ephram is promising. The ephram lactate the barrie. The ephram snowshoe the barrie. If something snowshoe the ephram and the ephram snowshoe the barrie then it lactate the ephram. If something is devoid and hesperian then it does not need the ephram. If something lactate the ephram then the ephram is pulverised. If the ephram is promising and the ephram vibrate the barrie then the ephram is not nameless. If something snowshoe the barrie and the barrie does not need the ephram then the barrie lactate the ephram. If something is pulverised then it vibrate the barrie. The barrie snowshoe the barrie.", "logic": "\nVibrate(barrie, ephram)\nnot Hesperian(barrie)\nNameless(barrie)\nnot Devoid(barrie)\nPromising(barrie)\nPulverised(barrie)\nLactate(barrie, ephram)\nSnowshoe(barrie, ephram)\nDevoid(ephram)\nPromising(ephram)\nLactate(ephram, barrie)\nSnowshoe(ephram, barrie)\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, ephram) and Snowshoe(ephram, barrie) -> Lactate(x, ephram))\nforall x (Devoid(x) and Hesperian(x) -> not Snowshoe(x, ephram))\nforall x (Lactate(x, ephram) -> Pulverised(ephram))\nPromising(ephram) and Vibrate(ephram, barrie) -> not Nameless(ephram)\nforall x (Snowshoe(x, barrie) and not Snowshoe(barrie, ephram) -> Lactate(barrie, ephram))\nforall x (Pulverised(x) -> Vibrate(x, barrie))\n\nSnowshoe(barrie, barrie)\n\nSnowshoe(barrie, barrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The genia drydock the verla. The genia is not simulated. The genia is woebegone. The genia is not cuspidal. The genia is sapiens. The genia is loyal. The genia inactivate the verla. The genia admix the verla. The verla is cuspidal. The verla is sapiens. The verla inactivate the genia. The verla admix the genia. If something admix the verla and the verla admix the genia then it inactivate the verla. If something is cuspidal and simulated then it does not need the verla. If something inactivate the verla then the verla is loyal. If the verla is sapiens and the verla drydock the genia then the verla is not woebegone. If something admix the genia and the genia does not need the verla then the genia inactivate the verla. If something is loyal then it drydock the genia. The verla is not simulated.", "logic": "\nDrydock(genia, verla)\nnot Simulated(genia)\nWoebegone(genia)\nnot Cuspidal(genia)\nSapiens(genia)\nLoyal(genia)\nInactivate(genia, verla)\nAdmix(genia, verla)\nCuspidal(verla)\nSapiens(verla)\nInactivate(verla, genia)\nAdmix(verla, genia)\nforall x (Admix(x, verla) and Admix(verla, genia) -> Inactivate(x, verla))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Simulated(x) -> not Admix(x, verla))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, verla) -> Loyal(verla))\nSapiens(verla) and Drydock(verla, genia) -> not Woebegone(verla)\nforall x (Admix(x, genia) and not Admix(genia, verla) -> Inactivate(genia, verla))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Drydock(x, genia))\n\nnot Simulated(verla)\n\nnot Simulated(verla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "The cherri quibble the leigha. The cherri is not apical. The cherri is sportive. The cherri is not unfilled. The cherri is unshapen. The cherri is blunted. The cherri closet the leigha. The cherri fornicate the leigha. The leigha is unfilled. The leigha is unshapen. The leigha closet the cherri. The leigha fornicate the cherri. If something fornicate the leigha and the leigha fornicate the cherri then it closet the leigha. If something is unfilled and apical then it does not need the leigha. If something closet the leigha then the leigha is blunted. If the leigha is unshapen and the leigha quibble the cherri then the leigha is not sportive. If something fornicate the cherri and the cherri does not need the leigha then the cherri closet the leigha. If something is blunted then it quibble the cherri. The cherri closet the cherri.", "logic": "\nQuibble(cherri, leigha)\nnot Apical(cherri)\nSportive(cherri)\nnot Unfilled(cherri)\nUnshapen(cherri)\nBlunted(cherri)\nCloset(cherri, leigha)\nFornicate(cherri, leigha)\nUnfilled(leigha)\nUnshapen(leigha)\nCloset(leigha, cherri)\nFornicate(leigha, cherri)\nforall x (Fornicate(x, leigha) and Fornicate(leigha, cherri) -> Closet(x, leigha))\nforall x (Unfilled(x) and Apical(x) -> not Fornicate(x, leigha))\nforall x (Closet(x, leigha) -> Blunted(leigha))\nUnshapen(leigha) and Quibble(leigha, cherri) -> not Sportive(leigha)\nforall x (Fornicate(x, cherri) and not Fornicate(cherri, leigha) -> Closet(cherri, leigha))\nforall x (Blunted(x) -> Quibble(x, cherri))\n\nCloset(cherri, cherri)\n\nCloset(cherri, cherri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-717"} {"premises": "Rosanne is malawian. Dinah is eudemonic. Dinah is temptable. If Rosanne is beardless then Rosanne is stripy. If something is malawian then it is beardless. If Rosanne is stripy then Rosanne is inshore. If something is temptable and not eudemonic then it is stripy. If something is inshore and not beardless then it is not temptable. If something is eudemonic and beardless then it is temptable. All stripy, unendowed things are temptable. Green, beardless things are not temptable. Rosanne is malawian.", "logic": "\nMalawian(rosanne)\nEudemonic(dinah)\nTemptable(dinah)\nBeardless(rosanne) -> Stripy(rosanne)\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Beardless(x))\nStripy(rosanne) -> Inshore(rosanne)\nforall x (Temptable(x) and not Eudemonic(x) -> Stripy(x))\nforall x (Inshore(x) and not Beardless(x) -> not Temptable(x))\nforall x (Eudemonic(x) and Beardless(x) -> Temptable(x))\nforall x (Stripy(x) and Unendowed(x) -> Temptable(x))\nforall x (Stripy(x) and Beardless(x) -> not Temptable(x))\n\nMalawian(rosanne)\n\ntherefore Malawian(rosanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Rubi is cancerous. Salem is areolar. Salem is tensile. If Rubi is hardcover then Rubi is zymoid. If something is cancerous then it is hardcover. If Rubi is zymoid then Rubi is desirous. If something is tensile and not areolar then it is zymoid. If something is desirous and not hardcover then it is not tensile. If something is areolar and hardcover then it is tensile. All zymoid, amaurotic things are tensile. Green, hardcover things are not tensile. Rubi is not cancerous.", "logic": "\nCancerous(rubi)\nAreolar(salem)\nTensile(salem)\nHardcover(rubi) -> Zymoid(rubi)\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> Hardcover(x))\nZymoid(rubi) -> Desirous(rubi)\nforall x (Tensile(x) and not Areolar(x) -> Zymoid(x))\nforall x (Desirous(x) and not Hardcover(x) -> not Tensile(x))\nforall x (Areolar(x) and Hardcover(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) and Amaurotic(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Zymoid(x) and Hardcover(x) -> not Tensile(x))\n\nnot Cancerous(rubi)\n\ntherefore Cancerous(rubi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Durward is spatulate. Salli is dural. Salli is equal. If Durward is pubertal then Durward is pasted. If something is spatulate then it is pubertal. If Durward is pasted then Durward is separative. If something is equal and not dural then it is pasted. If something is separative and not pubertal then it is not equal. If something is dural and pubertal then it is equal. All pasted, clothed things are equal. Green, pubertal things are not equal. Durward is pubertal.", "logic": "\nSpatulate(durward)\nDural(salli)\nEqual(salli)\nPubertal(durward) -> Pasted(durward)\nforall x (Spatulate(x) -> Pubertal(x))\nPasted(durward) -> Separative(durward)\nforall x (Equal(x) and not Dural(x) -> Pasted(x))\nforall x (Separative(x) and not Pubertal(x) -> not Equal(x))\nforall x (Dural(x) and Pubertal(x) -> Equal(x))\nforall x (Pasted(x) and Clothed(x) -> Equal(x))\nforall x (Pasted(x) and Pubertal(x) -> not Equal(x))\n\nPubertal(durward)\n\nSpatulate(durward) and forall x (Spatulate(x) -> Pubertal(x)) -> therefore Pubertal(durward)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Melvyn is passerine. Staford is elemental. Staford is lithe. If Melvyn is prostyle then Melvyn is caller. If something is passerine then it is prostyle. If Melvyn is caller then Melvyn is standard. If something is lithe and not elemental then it is caller. If something is standard and not prostyle then it is not lithe. If something is elemental and prostyle then it is lithe. All caller, meshed things are lithe. Green, prostyle things are not lithe. Melvyn is not prostyle.", "logic": "\nPasserine(melvyn)\nElemental(staford)\nLithe(staford)\nProstyle(melvyn) -> Caller(melvyn)\nforall x (Passerine(x) -> Prostyle(x))\nCaller(melvyn) -> Standard(melvyn)\nforall x (Lithe(x) and not Elemental(x) -> Caller(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) and not Prostyle(x) -> not Lithe(x))\nforall x (Elemental(x) and Prostyle(x) -> Lithe(x))\nforall x (Caller(x) and Meshed(x) -> Lithe(x))\nforall x (Caller(x) and Prostyle(x) -> not Lithe(x))\n\nnot Prostyle(melvyn)\n\nPasserine(melvyn) and forall x (Passerine(x) -> Prostyle(x)) -> therefore Prostyle(melvyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Cherida is gainly. Garcia is ratable. Garcia is epiphytic. If Cherida is xxxvi then Cherida is onside. If something is gainly then it is xxxvi. If Cherida is onside then Cherida is palpebrate. If something is epiphytic and not ratable then it is onside. If something is palpebrate and not xxxvi then it is not epiphytic. If something is ratable and xxxvi then it is epiphytic. All onside, rising things are epiphytic. Green, xxxvi things are not epiphytic. Cherida is onside.", "logic": "\nGainly(cherida)\nRatable(garcia)\nEpiphytic(garcia)\nXxxvi(cherida) -> Onside(cherida)\nforall x (Gainly(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nOnside(cherida) -> Palpebrate(cherida)\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) and not Ratable(x) -> Onside(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x) and not Xxxvi(x) -> not Epiphytic(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) and Xxxvi(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\nforall x (Onside(x) and Rising(x) -> Epiphytic(x))\nforall x (Onside(x) and Xxxvi(x) -> not Epiphytic(x))\n\nOnside(cherida)\n\nGainly(cherida) and forall x (Gainly(x) -> Xxxvi(x)) -> therefore Xxxvi(cherida) Xxxvi(cherida) and Xxxvi(cherida) -> Onside(cherida) -> therefore Onside(cherida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Aaron is lumbering. Esta is protruding. Esta is pesky. If Aaron is bony then Aaron is polyglot. If something is lumbering then it is bony. If Aaron is polyglot then Aaron is huffy. If something is pesky and not protruding then it is polyglot. If something is huffy and not bony then it is not pesky. If something is protruding and bony then it is pesky. All polyglot, coastwise things are pesky. Green, bony things are not pesky. Aaron is not polyglot.", "logic": "\nLumbering(aaron)\nProtruding(esta)\nPesky(esta)\nBony(aaron) -> Polyglot(aaron)\nforall x (Lumbering(x) -> Bony(x))\nPolyglot(aaron) -> Huffy(aaron)\nforall x (Pesky(x) and not Protruding(x) -> Polyglot(x))\nforall x (Huffy(x) and not Bony(x) -> not Pesky(x))\nforall x (Protruding(x) and Bony(x) -> Pesky(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) and Coastwise(x) -> Pesky(x))\nforall x (Polyglot(x) and Bony(x) -> not Pesky(x))\n\nnot Polyglot(aaron)\n\nLumbering(aaron) and forall x (Lumbering(x) -> Bony(x)) -> therefore Bony(aaron) Bony(aaron) and Bony(aaron) -> Polyglot(aaron) -> therefore Polyglot(aaron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Slade is girlish. Brenn is austenitic. Brenn is vapourous. If Slade is acid then Slade is lank. If something is girlish then it is acid. If Slade is lank then Slade is reniform. If something is vapourous and not austenitic then it is lank. If something is reniform and not acid then it is not vapourous. If something is austenitic and acid then it is vapourous. All lank, boisterous things are vapourous. Green, acid things are not vapourous. Slade is reniform.", "logic": "\nGirlish(slade)\nAustenitic(brenn)\nVapourous(brenn)\nAcid(slade) -> Lank(slade)\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Acid(x))\nLank(slade) -> Reniform(slade)\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and not Austenitic(x) -> Lank(x))\nforall x (Reniform(x) and not Acid(x) -> not Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Austenitic(x) and Acid(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) and Boisterous(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) and Acid(x) -> not Vapourous(x))\n\nReniform(slade)\n\nGirlish(slade) and forall x (Girlish(x) -> Acid(x)) -> therefore Acid(slade) Acid(slade) and Acid(slade) -> Lank(slade) -> therefore Lank(slade) Lank(slade) and Lank(slade) -> Reniform(slade) -> therefore Reniform(slade)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Hilde is totemic. Gabriel is radiant. Gabriel is citrous. If Hilde is besieged then Hilde is ribless. If something is totemic then it is besieged. If Hilde is ribless then Hilde is hooved. If something is citrous and not radiant then it is ribless. If something is hooved and not besieged then it is not citrous. If something is radiant and besieged then it is citrous. All ribless, xxxvii things are citrous. Green, besieged things are not citrous. Hilde is not hooved.", "logic": "\nTotemic(hilde)\nRadiant(gabriel)\nCitrous(gabriel)\nBesieged(hilde) -> Ribless(hilde)\nforall x (Totemic(x) -> Besieged(x))\nRibless(hilde) -> Hooved(hilde)\nforall x (Citrous(x) and not Radiant(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Hooved(x) and not Besieged(x) -> not Citrous(x))\nforall x (Radiant(x) and Besieged(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Xxxvii(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Besieged(x) -> not Citrous(x))\n\nnot Hooved(hilde)\n\nTotemic(hilde) and forall x (Totemic(x) -> Besieged(x)) -> therefore Besieged(hilde) Besieged(hilde) and Besieged(hilde) -> Ribless(hilde) -> therefore Ribless(hilde) Ribless(hilde) and Ribless(hilde) -> Hooved(hilde) -> therefore Hooved(hilde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Tate is plumelike. Cilka is provident. Cilka is redux. If Tate is dissimilar then Tate is civilized. If something is plumelike then it is dissimilar. If Tate is civilized then Tate is rebellious. If something is redux and not provident then it is civilized. If something is rebellious and not dissimilar then it is not redux. If something is provident and dissimilar then it is redux. All civilized, bigeminal things are redux. Green, dissimilar things are not redux. Cilka is not civilized.", "logic": "\nPlumelike(tate)\nProvident(cilka)\nRedux(cilka)\nDissimilar(tate) -> Civilized(tate)\nforall x (Plumelike(x) -> Dissimilar(x))\nCivilized(tate) -> Rebellious(tate)\nforall x (Redux(x) and not Provident(x) -> Civilized(x))\nforall x (Rebellious(x) and not Dissimilar(x) -> not Redux(x))\nforall x (Provident(x) and Dissimilar(x) -> Redux(x))\nforall x (Civilized(x) and Bigeminal(x) -> Redux(x))\nforall x (Civilized(x) and Dissimilar(x) -> not Redux(x))\n\nnot Civilized(cilka)\n\nforall x (Redux(x) and not Provident(x) -> Civilized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Maia is chesty. Sheril is appellate. Sheril is romish. If Maia is unpopular then Maia is prongy. If something is chesty then it is unpopular. If Maia is prongy then Maia is depleted. If something is romish and not appellate then it is prongy. If something is depleted and not unpopular then it is not romish. If something is appellate and unpopular then it is romish. All prongy, shimmery things are romish. Green, unpopular things are not romish. Sheril is unpopular.", "logic": "\nChesty(maia)\nAppellate(sheril)\nRomish(sheril)\nUnpopular(maia) -> Prongy(maia)\nforall x (Chesty(x) -> Unpopular(x))\nProngy(maia) -> Depleted(maia)\nforall x (Romish(x) and not Appellate(x) -> Prongy(x))\nforall x (Depleted(x) and not Unpopular(x) -> not Romish(x))\nforall x (Appellate(x) and Unpopular(x) -> Romish(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) and Shimmery(x) -> Romish(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) and Unpopular(x) -> not Romish(x))\n\nUnpopular(sheril)\n\nforall x (Chesty(x) -> Unpopular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Kimmie is swish. Zandra is fertile. Zandra is imbecilic. If Kimmie is diadromous then Kimmie is cuspidal. If something is swish then it is diadromous. If Kimmie is cuspidal then Kimmie is naturistic. If something is imbecilic and not fertile then it is cuspidal. If something is naturistic and not diadromous then it is not imbecilic. If something is fertile and diadromous then it is imbecilic. All cuspidal, diffused things are imbecilic. Green, diadromous things are not imbecilic. Kimmie is not diffused.", "logic": "\nSwish(kimmie)\nFertile(zandra)\nImbecilic(zandra)\nDiadromous(kimmie) -> Cuspidal(kimmie)\nforall x (Swish(x) -> Diadromous(x))\nCuspidal(kimmie) -> Naturistic(kimmie)\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) and not Fertile(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Naturistic(x) and not Diadromous(x) -> not Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Fertile(x) and Diadromous(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Diffused(x) -> Imbecilic(x))\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Diadromous(x) -> not Imbecilic(x))\n\nnot Diffused(kimmie)\n\nnot Diffused(kimmie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Carmel is pneumatic. Walden is mirthful. Walden is possible. If Carmel is tottery then Carmel is regardless. If something is pneumatic then it is tottery. If Carmel is regardless then Carmel is maplelike. If something is possible and not mirthful then it is regardless. If something is maplelike and not tottery then it is not possible. If something is mirthful and tottery then it is possible. All regardless, schismatic things are possible. Green, tottery things are not possible. Walden is maplelike.", "logic": "\nPneumatic(carmel)\nMirthful(walden)\nPossible(walden)\nTottery(carmel) -> Regardless(carmel)\nforall x (Pneumatic(x) -> Tottery(x))\nRegardless(carmel) -> Maplelike(carmel)\nforall x (Possible(x) and not Mirthful(x) -> Regardless(x))\nforall x (Maplelike(x) and not Tottery(x) -> not Possible(x))\nforall x (Mirthful(x) and Tottery(x) -> Possible(x))\nforall x (Regardless(x) and Schismatic(x) -> Possible(x))\nforall x (Regardless(x) and Tottery(x) -> not Possible(x))\n\nMaplelike(walden)\n\nMaplelike(walden) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Joelle is troubled. Judas is thrown. Judas is taxing. If Joelle is imbricate then Joelle is antifungal. If something is troubled then it is imbricate. If Joelle is antifungal then Joelle is acrobatic. If something is taxing and not thrown then it is antifungal. If something is acrobatic and not imbricate then it is not taxing. If something is thrown and imbricate then it is taxing. All antifungal, ratable things are taxing. Green, imbricate things are not taxing. Judas is not troubled.", "logic": "\nTroubled(joelle)\nThrown(judas)\nTaxing(judas)\nImbricate(joelle) -> Antifungal(joelle)\nforall x (Troubled(x) -> Imbricate(x))\nAntifungal(joelle) -> Acrobatic(joelle)\nforall x (Taxing(x) and not Thrown(x) -> Antifungal(x))\nforall x (Acrobatic(x) and not Imbricate(x) -> not Taxing(x))\nforall x (Thrown(x) and Imbricate(x) -> Taxing(x))\nforall x (Antifungal(x) and Ratable(x) -> Taxing(x))\nforall x (Antifungal(x) and Imbricate(x) -> not Taxing(x))\n\nnot Troubled(judas)\n\nnot Troubled(judas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Dyna is epicurean. Agnese is mint. Agnese is humorless. If Dyna is delusive then Dyna is palpatory. If something is epicurean then it is delusive. If Dyna is palpatory then Dyna is foliolate. If something is humorless and not mint then it is palpatory. If something is foliolate and not delusive then it is not humorless. If something is mint and delusive then it is humorless. All palpatory, indecent things are humorless. Green, delusive things are not humorless. Agnese is indecent.", "logic": "\nEpicurean(dyna)\nMint(agnese)\nHumorless(agnese)\nDelusive(dyna) -> Palpatory(dyna)\nforall x (Epicurean(x) -> Delusive(x))\nPalpatory(dyna) -> Foliolate(dyna)\nforall x (Humorless(x) and not Mint(x) -> Palpatory(x))\nforall x (Foliolate(x) and not Delusive(x) -> not Humorless(x))\nforall x (Mint(x) and Delusive(x) -> Humorless(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Indecent(x) -> Humorless(x))\nforall x (Palpatory(x) and Delusive(x) -> not Humorless(x))\n\nIndecent(agnese)\n\nIndecent(agnese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-482"} {"premises": "Hillel is bootleg. Hillel is untrusting. Hillel is planetary. Hillel is toothed. Hillel is not starlike. Hillel is belarusian. Hillel is prolonged. If Hillel is toothed and Hillel is not starlike then Hillel is untrusting. Hillel is not starlike.", "logic": "\nBootleg(hillel)\nUntrusting(hillel)\nPlanetary(hillel)\nToothed(hillel)\nnot Starlike(hillel)\nBelarusian(hillel)\nProlonged(hillel)\nToothed(hillel) and not Starlike(hillel) -> Untrusting(hillel)\n\nnot Starlike(hillel)\n\ntherefore not Starlike(hillel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-849"} {"premises": "Heather is tilled. Heather is sceptred. Heather is resistant. Heather is embedded. Heather is not girlish. Heather is parallel. Heather is admirable. If Heather is embedded and Heather is not girlish then Heather is sceptred. Heather is not parallel.", "logic": "\nTilled(heather)\nSceptred(heather)\nResistant(heather)\nEmbedded(heather)\nnot Girlish(heather)\nParallel(heather)\nAdmirable(heather)\nEmbedded(heather) and not Girlish(heather) -> Sceptred(heather)\n\nnot Parallel(heather)\n\ntherefore Parallel(heather)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-849"} {"premises": "Darcey is sandpapery. Darcey is discerning. Darcey is inmost. Darcey is capsulate. Darcey is unread. Darcey is xenogeneic. Darcey is desecrated. Cold, capsulate things are discerning. Darcey is unread.", "logic": "\nSandpapery(darcey)\nDiscerning(darcey)\nInmost(darcey)\nCapsulate(darcey)\nUnread(darcey)\nXenogeneic(darcey)\nDesecrated(darcey)\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Capsulate(x) -> Discerning(x))\n\nUnread(darcey)\n\ntherefore Unread(darcey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5569"} {"premises": "Riccardo is hominine. Riccardo is physical. Riccardo is tyrannous. Riccardo is lucullan. Riccardo is cleft. Riccardo is invalid. Riccardo is employed. Cold, lucullan things are physical. Riccardo is not cleft.", "logic": "\nHominine(riccardo)\nPhysical(riccardo)\nTyrannous(riccardo)\nLucullan(riccardo)\nCleft(riccardo)\nInvalid(riccardo)\nEmployed(riccardo)\nforall x (Hominine(x) and Lucullan(x) -> Physical(x))\n\nnot Cleft(riccardo)\n\ntherefore Cleft(riccardo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5569"} {"premises": "Regan is alight. Regan is untroubled. Regan is drowsy. Regan is slanting. Regan is sinless. Regan is iraki. Eugene is alight. Eugene is slanting. Eugene is sinless. Eugene is iraki. Eugene is accredited. Beverly is alight. Beverly is drowsy. Beverly is sinless. Beverly is accredited. Blue people are drowsy. Rough, alight people are untroubled. If someone is accredited then they are alight. White people are drowsy. All alight, sinless people are slanting. All drowsy, accredited people are iraki. Beverly is accredited.", "logic": "\nAlight(regan)\nUntroubled(regan)\nDrowsy(regan)\nSlanting(regan)\nSinless(regan)\nIraki(regan)\nAlight(eugene)\nSlanting(eugene)\nSinless(eugene)\nIraki(eugene)\nAccredited(eugene)\nAlight(beverly)\nDrowsy(beverly)\nSinless(beverly)\nAccredited(beverly)\nforall x (Untroubled(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Sinless(x) and Alight(x) -> Untroubled(x))\nforall x (Accredited(x) -> Alight(x))\nforall x (Accredited(x) -> Drowsy(x))\nforall x (Alight(x) and Sinless(x) -> Slanting(x))\nforall x (Drowsy(x) and Accredited(x) -> Iraki(x))\n\nAccredited(beverly)\n\ntherefore Accredited(beverly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1888"} {"premises": "Clotilda is dermal. Clotilda is overage. Clotilda is xxxii. Clotilda is unvoiced. Clotilda is relevant. Clotilda is climatic. Susanetta is dermal. Susanetta is unvoiced. Susanetta is relevant. Susanetta is climatic. Susanetta is exploited. Micah is dermal. Micah is xxxii. Micah is relevant. Micah is exploited. Blue people are xxxii. Rough, dermal people are overage. If someone is exploited then they are dermal. White people are xxxii. All dermal, relevant people are unvoiced. All xxxii, exploited people are climatic. Susanetta is not relevant.", "logic": "\nDermal(clotilda)\nOverage(clotilda)\nXxxii(clotilda)\nUnvoiced(clotilda)\nRelevant(clotilda)\nClimatic(clotilda)\nDermal(susanetta)\nUnvoiced(susanetta)\nRelevant(susanetta)\nClimatic(susanetta)\nExploited(susanetta)\nDermal(micah)\nXxxii(micah)\nRelevant(micah)\nExploited(micah)\nforall x (Overage(x) -> Xxxii(x))\nforall x (Relevant(x) and Dermal(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Exploited(x) -> Dermal(x))\nforall x (Exploited(x) -> Xxxii(x))\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Relevant(x) -> Unvoiced(x))\nforall x (Xxxii(x) and Exploited(x) -> Climatic(x))\n\nnot Relevant(susanetta)\n\ntherefore Relevant(susanetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1888"} {"premises": "Garvin is costal. Garvin is intrusive. Garvin is galvanic. Denna is courageous. Denna is sunny. Denna is costal. Denna is intrusive. Denna is paved. Denna is galvanic. Denna is lacrimal. Parrnell is sunny. Parrnell is costal. Parrnell is intrusive. Parrnell is paved. Patience is paved. Patience is lacrimal. All sunny, galvanic people are paved. Denna is intrusive.", "logic": "\nCostal(garvin)\nIntrusive(garvin)\nGalvanic(garvin)\nCourageous(denna)\nSunny(denna)\nCostal(denna)\nIntrusive(denna)\nPaved(denna)\nGalvanic(denna)\nLacrimal(denna)\nSunny(parrnell)\nCostal(parrnell)\nIntrusive(parrnell)\nPaved(parrnell)\nPaved(patience)\nLacrimal(patience)\nforall x (Sunny(x) and Galvanic(x) -> Paved(x))\n\nIntrusive(denna)\n\ntherefore Intrusive(denna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2647"} {"premises": "Denis is ranging. Denis is lipophilic. Denis is caesural. Leeanne is undercover. Leeanne is mundane. Leeanne is ranging. Leeanne is lipophilic. Leeanne is madcap. Leeanne is caesural. Leeanne is trepid. Melisse is mundane. Melisse is ranging. Melisse is lipophilic. Melisse is madcap. Jermaine is madcap. Jermaine is trepid. All mundane, caesural people are madcap. Leeanne is not madcap.", "logic": "\nRanging(denis)\nLipophilic(denis)\nCaesural(denis)\nUndercover(leeanne)\nMundane(leeanne)\nRanging(leeanne)\nLipophilic(leeanne)\nMadcap(leeanne)\nCaesural(leeanne)\nTrepid(leeanne)\nMundane(melisse)\nRanging(melisse)\nLipophilic(melisse)\nMadcap(melisse)\nMadcap(jermaine)\nTrepid(jermaine)\nforall x (Mundane(x) and Caesural(x) -> Madcap(x))\n\nnot Madcap(leeanne)\n\ntherefore Madcap(leeanne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2647"} {"premises": "Angelia is uvular. Angelia is causative. Angelia is northwest. Austine is stone. Austine is confusable. Austine is uvular. Austine is causative. Austine is broadnosed. Austine is northwest. Austine is anestrous. Edi is confusable. Edi is uvular. Edi is causative. Edi is broadnosed. Jabez is broadnosed. Jabez is anestrous. All confusable, northwest people are broadnosed. Angelia is not broadnosed.", "logic": "\nUvular(angelia)\nCausative(angelia)\nNorthwest(angelia)\nStone(austine)\nConfusable(austine)\nUvular(austine)\nCausative(austine)\nBroadnosed(austine)\nNorthwest(austine)\nAnestrous(austine)\nConfusable(edi)\nUvular(edi)\nCausative(edi)\nBroadnosed(edi)\nBroadnosed(jabez)\nAnestrous(jabez)\nforall x (Confusable(x) and Northwest(x) -> Broadnosed(x))\n\nnot Broadnosed(angelia)\n\nforall x (Confusable(x) and Northwest(x) -> Broadnosed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2647"} {"premises": "Fina is texan. Fina is umber. Fina is supported. Allen is enzootic. Allen is glabellar. Allen is texan. Allen is umber. Allen is syndetic. Allen is supported. Allen is writhed. Erma is glabellar. Erma is texan. Erma is umber. Erma is syndetic. Susie is syndetic. Susie is writhed. All glabellar, supported people are syndetic. Susie is umber.", "logic": "\nTexan(fina)\nUmber(fina)\nSupported(fina)\nEnzootic(allen)\nGlabellar(allen)\nTexan(allen)\nUmber(allen)\nSyndetic(allen)\nSupported(allen)\nWrithed(allen)\nGlabellar(erma)\nTexan(erma)\nUmber(erma)\nSyndetic(erma)\nSyndetic(susie)\nWrithed(susie)\nforall x (Glabellar(x) and Supported(x) -> Syndetic(x))\n\nUmber(susie)\n\nUmber(susie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2647"} {"premises": "The weylin pedal the ruthy. The joelie liaise the adrienne. The ruthy frighten the adrienne. The adrienne is turkmen. If someone is turkmen then they like the joelie. If someone is unwise and they visit the adrienne then the adrienne liaise the ruthy. If the adrienne liaise the ruthy and the ruthy frighten the adrienne then the ruthy pedal the adrienne. If someone is skillful and they visit the adrienne then the adrienne liaise the weylin. If someone frighten the joelie then the joelie liaise the weylin. If someone pedal the ruthy then they are skillful. The joelie liaise the adrienne.", "logic": "\nPedal(weylin, ruthy)\nLiaise(joelie, adrienne)\nFrighten(ruthy, adrienne)\nTurkmen(adrienne)\nforall x (Turkmen(x) -> Frighten(x, joelie))\nforall x (Unwise(x) and Pedal(x, adrienne) -> Liaise(adrienne, ruthy))\nLiaise(adrienne, ruthy) and Frighten(ruthy, adrienne) -> Pedal(ruthy, adrienne)\nforall x (Skillful(x) and Pedal(x, adrienne) -> Liaise(adrienne, weylin))\nforall x (Frighten(x, joelie) -> Liaise(joelie, weylin))\nforall x (Pedal(x, ruthy) -> Skillful(x))\n\nLiaise(joelie, adrienne)\n\ntherefore Liaise(joelie, adrienne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The danella chloroform the clotilda. The brittan blob the gilli. The clotilda scoop the gilli. The gilli is queenlike. If someone is queenlike then they like the brittan. If someone is inviting and they visit the gilli then the gilli blob the clotilda. If the gilli blob the clotilda and the clotilda scoop the gilli then the clotilda chloroform the gilli. If someone is sterilised and they visit the gilli then the gilli blob the danella. If someone scoop the brittan then the brittan blob the danella. If someone chloroform the clotilda then they are sterilised. The brittan does not need the gilli.", "logic": "\nChloroform(danella, clotilda)\nBlob(brittan, gilli)\nScoop(clotilda, gilli)\nQueenlike(gilli)\nforall x (Queenlike(x) -> Scoop(x, brittan))\nforall x (Inviting(x) and Chloroform(x, gilli) -> Blob(gilli, clotilda))\nBlob(gilli, clotilda) and Scoop(clotilda, gilli) -> Chloroform(clotilda, gilli)\nforall x (Sterilised(x) and Chloroform(x, gilli) -> Blob(gilli, danella))\nforall x (Scoop(x, brittan) -> Blob(brittan, danella))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, clotilda) -> Sterilised(x))\n\nnot Blob(brittan, gilli)\n\ntherefore Blob(brittan, gilli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The gabbi stipulate the stillmann. The estel grout the sheree. The stillmann indulge the sheree. The sheree is healed. If someone is healed then they like the estel. If someone is helpful and they visit the sheree then the sheree grout the stillmann. If the sheree grout the stillmann and the stillmann indulge the sheree then the stillmann stipulate the sheree. If someone is overhasty and they visit the sheree then the sheree grout the gabbi. If someone indulge the estel then the estel grout the gabbi. If someone stipulate the stillmann then they are overhasty. The gabbi is overhasty.", "logic": "\nStipulate(gabbi, stillmann)\nGrout(estel, sheree)\nIndulge(stillmann, sheree)\nHealed(sheree)\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Indulge(x, estel))\nforall x (Helpful(x) and Stipulate(x, sheree) -> Grout(sheree, stillmann))\nGrout(sheree, stillmann) and Indulge(stillmann, sheree) -> Stipulate(stillmann, sheree)\nforall x (Overhasty(x) and Stipulate(x, sheree) -> Grout(sheree, gabbi))\nforall x (Indulge(x, estel) -> Grout(estel, gabbi))\nforall x (Stipulate(x, stillmann) -> Overhasty(x))\n\nOverhasty(gabbi)\n\nStipulate(gabbi, stillmann) and forall x (Stipulate(x, stillmann) -> Overhasty(x)) -> therefore Overhasty(gabbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The solomon band the roxie. The adena tonsure the angelita. The roxie rile the angelita. The angelita is blusterous. If someone is blusterous then they like the adena. If someone is summative and they visit the angelita then the angelita tonsure the roxie. If the angelita tonsure the roxie and the roxie rile the angelita then the roxie band the angelita. If someone is emarginate and they visit the angelita then the angelita tonsure the solomon. If someone rile the adena then the adena tonsure the solomon. If someone band the roxie then they are emarginate. The angelita does not like the adena.", "logic": "\nBand(solomon, roxie)\nTonsure(adena, angelita)\nRile(roxie, angelita)\nBlusterous(angelita)\nforall x (Blusterous(x) -> Rile(x, adena))\nforall x (Summative(x) and Band(x, angelita) -> Tonsure(angelita, roxie))\nTonsure(angelita, roxie) and Rile(roxie, angelita) -> Band(roxie, angelita)\nforall x (Emarginate(x) and Band(x, angelita) -> Tonsure(angelita, solomon))\nforall x (Rile(x, adena) -> Tonsure(adena, solomon))\nforall x (Band(x, roxie) -> Emarginate(x))\n\nnot Rile(angelita, adena)\n\nBlusterous(angelita) and forall x (Blusterous(x) -> Rile(x, adena)) -> therefore Rile(angelita, adena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The dimitry embezzle the laurette. The trip perfect the laural. The laurette bridge the laural. The laural is periwigged. If someone is periwigged then they like the trip. If someone is cleavable and they visit the laural then the laural perfect the laurette. If the laural perfect the laurette and the laurette bridge the laural then the laurette embezzle the laural. If someone is slithering and they visit the laural then the laural perfect the dimitry. If someone bridge the trip then the trip perfect the dimitry. If someone embezzle the laurette then they are slithering. The trip perfect the dimitry.", "logic": "\nEmbezzle(dimitry, laurette)\nPerfect(trip, laural)\nBridge(laurette, laural)\nPeriwigged(laural)\nforall x (Periwigged(x) -> Bridge(x, trip))\nforall x (Cleavable(x) and Embezzle(x, laural) -> Perfect(laural, laurette))\nPerfect(laural, laurette) and Bridge(laurette, laural) -> Embezzle(laurette, laural)\nforall x (Slithering(x) and Embezzle(x, laural) -> Perfect(laural, dimitry))\nforall x (Bridge(x, trip) -> Perfect(trip, dimitry))\nforall x (Embezzle(x, laurette) -> Slithering(x))\n\nPerfect(trip, dimitry)\n\nPeriwigged(laural) and forall x (Periwigged(x) -> Bridge(x, trip)) -> therefore Bridge(laural, trip) Bridge(laural, trip) and forall x (Bridge(x, trip) -> Perfect(trip, dimitry)) -> therefore Perfect(trip, dimitry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The geo bankrupt the brear. The belicia dunk the ciel. The brear smother the ciel. The ciel is hallowed. If someone is hallowed then they like the belicia. If someone is vestiary and they visit the ciel then the ciel dunk the brear. If the ciel dunk the brear and the brear smother the ciel then the brear bankrupt the ciel. If someone is loamy and they visit the ciel then the ciel dunk the geo. If someone smother the belicia then the belicia dunk the geo. If someone bankrupt the brear then they are loamy. The belicia does not need the geo.", "logic": "\nBankrupt(geo, brear)\nDunk(belicia, ciel)\nSmother(brear, ciel)\nHallowed(ciel)\nforall x (Hallowed(x) -> Smother(x, belicia))\nforall x (Vestiary(x) and Bankrupt(x, ciel) -> Dunk(ciel, brear))\nDunk(ciel, brear) and Smother(brear, ciel) -> Bankrupt(brear, ciel)\nforall x (Loamy(x) and Bankrupt(x, ciel) -> Dunk(ciel, geo))\nforall x (Smother(x, belicia) -> Dunk(belicia, geo))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, brear) -> Loamy(x))\n\nnot Dunk(belicia, geo)\n\nHallowed(ciel) and forall x (Hallowed(x) -> Smother(x, belicia)) -> therefore Smother(ciel, belicia) Smother(ciel, belicia) and forall x (Smother(x, belicia) -> Dunk(belicia, geo)) -> therefore Dunk(belicia, geo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The lucy airfreight the dorette. The callie drink the tadd. The dorette eavesdrop the tadd. The tadd is sissified. If someone is sissified then they like the callie. If someone is referenced and they visit the tadd then the tadd drink the dorette. If the tadd drink the dorette and the dorette eavesdrop the tadd then the dorette airfreight the tadd. If someone is coreferent and they visit the tadd then the tadd drink the lucy. If someone eavesdrop the callie then the callie drink the lucy. If someone airfreight the dorette then they are coreferent. The tadd is not coreferent.", "logic": "\nAirfreight(lucy, dorette)\nDrink(callie, tadd)\nEavesdrop(dorette, tadd)\nSissified(tadd)\nforall x (Sissified(x) -> Eavesdrop(x, callie))\nforall x (Referenced(x) and Airfreight(x, tadd) -> Drink(tadd, dorette))\nDrink(tadd, dorette) and Eavesdrop(dorette, tadd) -> Airfreight(dorette, tadd)\nforall x (Coreferent(x) and Airfreight(x, tadd) -> Drink(tadd, lucy))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, callie) -> Drink(callie, lucy))\nforall x (Airfreight(x, dorette) -> Coreferent(x))\n\nnot Coreferent(tadd)\n\nforall x (Airfreight(x, dorette) -> Coreferent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The mika damn the quintus. The andrei blackwash the betsey. The quintus capsize the betsey. The betsey is wearied. If someone is wearied then they like the andrei. If someone is unbarred and they visit the betsey then the betsey blackwash the quintus. If the betsey blackwash the quintus and the quintus capsize the betsey then the quintus damn the betsey. If someone is penal and they visit the betsey then the betsey blackwash the mika. If someone capsize the andrei then the andrei blackwash the mika. If someone damn the quintus then they are penal. The quintus damn the betsey.", "logic": "\nDamn(mika, quintus)\nBlackwash(andrei, betsey)\nCapsize(quintus, betsey)\nWearied(betsey)\nforall x (Wearied(x) -> Capsize(x, andrei))\nforall x (Unbarred(x) and Damn(x, betsey) -> Blackwash(betsey, quintus))\nBlackwash(betsey, quintus) and Capsize(quintus, betsey) -> Damn(quintus, betsey)\nforall x (Penal(x) and Damn(x, betsey) -> Blackwash(betsey, mika))\nforall x (Capsize(x, andrei) -> Blackwash(andrei, mika))\nforall x (Damn(x, quintus) -> Penal(x))\n\nDamn(quintus, betsey)\n\nBlackwash(betsey, quintus) and Capsize(quintus, betsey) -> Damn(quintus, betsey) <- forall x (Unbarred(x) and Damn(x, betsey) -> Blackwash(betsey, quintus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The celesta jolly the lynnet. The gael ignore the ruth. The lynnet tumefy the ruth. The ruth is untaped. If someone is untaped then they like the gael. If someone is uncritical and they visit the ruth then the ruth ignore the lynnet. If the ruth ignore the lynnet and the lynnet tumefy the ruth then the lynnet jolly the ruth. If someone is baroque and they visit the ruth then the ruth ignore the celesta. If someone tumefy the gael then the gael ignore the celesta. If someone jolly the lynnet then they are baroque. The gael is not baroque.", "logic": "\nJolly(celesta, lynnet)\nIgnore(gael, ruth)\nTumefy(lynnet, ruth)\nUntaped(ruth)\nforall x (Untaped(x) -> Tumefy(x, gael))\nforall x (Uncritical(x) and Jolly(x, ruth) -> Ignore(ruth, lynnet))\nIgnore(ruth, lynnet) and Tumefy(lynnet, ruth) -> Jolly(lynnet, ruth)\nforall x (Baroque(x) and Jolly(x, ruth) -> Ignore(ruth, celesta))\nforall x (Tumefy(x, gael) -> Ignore(gael, celesta))\nforall x (Jolly(x, lynnet) -> Baroque(x))\n\nnot Baroque(gael)\n\nforall x (Jolly(x, lynnet) -> Baroque(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The hermia vivisect the rhiamon. The luce decrypt the luciana. The rhiamon outroar the luciana. The luciana is hypnotized. If someone is hypnotized then they like the luce. If someone is hominian and they visit the luciana then the luciana decrypt the rhiamon. If the luciana decrypt the rhiamon and the rhiamon outroar the luciana then the rhiamon vivisect the luciana. If someone is sticking and they visit the luciana then the luciana decrypt the hermia. If someone outroar the luce then the luce decrypt the hermia. If someone vivisect the rhiamon then they are sticking. The luciana vivisect the rhiamon.", "logic": "\nVivisect(hermia, rhiamon)\nDecrypt(luce, luciana)\nOutroar(rhiamon, luciana)\nHypnotized(luciana)\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) -> Outroar(x, luce))\nforall x (Hominian(x) and Vivisect(x, luciana) -> Decrypt(luciana, rhiamon))\nDecrypt(luciana, rhiamon) and Outroar(rhiamon, luciana) -> Vivisect(rhiamon, luciana)\nforall x (Sticking(x) and Vivisect(x, luciana) -> Decrypt(luciana, hermia))\nforall x (Outroar(x, luce) -> Decrypt(luce, hermia))\nforall x (Vivisect(x, rhiamon) -> Sticking(x))\n\nVivisect(luciana, rhiamon)\n\nVivisect(luciana, rhiamon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The carlota interject the kimberly. The griffin misfire the dottie. The kimberly shade the dottie. The dottie is wound. If someone is wound then they like the griffin. If someone is annulated and they visit the dottie then the dottie misfire the kimberly. If the dottie misfire the kimberly and the kimberly shade the dottie then the kimberly interject the dottie. If someone is thundery and they visit the dottie then the dottie misfire the carlota. If someone shade the griffin then the griffin misfire the carlota. If someone interject the kimberly then they are thundery. The carlota does not need the carlota.", "logic": "\nInterject(carlota, kimberly)\nMisfire(griffin, dottie)\nShade(kimberly, dottie)\nWound(dottie)\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Shade(x, griffin))\nforall x (Annulated(x) and Interject(x, dottie) -> Misfire(dottie, kimberly))\nMisfire(dottie, kimberly) and Shade(kimberly, dottie) -> Interject(kimberly, dottie)\nforall x (Thundery(x) and Interject(x, dottie) -> Misfire(dottie, carlota))\nforall x (Shade(x, griffin) -> Misfire(griffin, carlota))\nforall x (Interject(x, kimberly) -> Thundery(x))\n\nnot Misfire(carlota, carlota)\n\nnot Misfire(carlota, carlota) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The kacey dispute the sacha. The cheryl slow the brunhilda. The sacha resist the brunhilda. The brunhilda is solid. If someone is solid then they like the cheryl. If someone is katari and they visit the brunhilda then the brunhilda slow the sacha. If the brunhilda slow the sacha and the sacha resist the brunhilda then the sacha dispute the brunhilda. If someone is cesarian and they visit the brunhilda then the brunhilda slow the kacey. If someone resist the cheryl then the cheryl slow the kacey. If someone dispute the sacha then they are cesarian. The brunhilda slow the cheryl.", "logic": "\nDispute(kacey, sacha)\nSlow(cheryl, brunhilda)\nResist(sacha, brunhilda)\nSolid(brunhilda)\nforall x (Solid(x) -> Resist(x, cheryl))\nforall x (Katari(x) and Dispute(x, brunhilda) -> Slow(brunhilda, sacha))\nSlow(brunhilda, sacha) and Resist(sacha, brunhilda) -> Dispute(sacha, brunhilda)\nforall x (Cesarian(x) and Dispute(x, brunhilda) -> Slow(brunhilda, kacey))\nforall x (Resist(x, cheryl) -> Slow(cheryl, kacey))\nforall x (Dispute(x, sacha) -> Cesarian(x))\n\nSlow(brunhilda, cheryl)\n\nSlow(brunhilda, cheryl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1302"} {"premises": "The eugen decolonise the lucienne. The eugen carburise the lucienne. The eugen is taking. The eugen shallow the lucienne. The lucienne is receptive. The lucienne is bistered. The lucienne shallow the eugen. If something is tepid then it shallow the lucienne. If something decolonise the eugen then the eugen is receptive. If something is tepid and it carburise the eugen then it is bistered. If something is bistered then it carburise the eugen. If something decolonise the lucienne and it is receptive then it carburise the eugen. If something shallow the lucienne and it is taking then the lucienne decolonise the eugen. If something decolonise the lucienne and the lucienne is bistered then the lucienne is taking. If something shallow the eugen and the eugen shallow the lucienne then it is taking. The lucienne is receptive.", "logic": "\nDecolonise(eugen, lucienne)\nCarburise(eugen, lucienne)\nTaking(eugen)\nShallow(eugen, lucienne)\nReceptive(lucienne)\nBistered(lucienne)\nShallow(lucienne, eugen)\nforall x (Tepid(x) -> Shallow(x, lucienne))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, eugen) -> Receptive(eugen))\nforall x (Tepid(x) and Carburise(x, eugen) -> Bistered(x))\nforall x (Bistered(x) -> Carburise(x, eugen))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, lucienne) and Receptive(x) -> Carburise(x, eugen))\nforall x (Shallow(x, lucienne) and Taking(x) -> Decolonise(lucienne, eugen))\nforall x (Decolonise(x, lucienne) and Bistered(lucienne) -> Taking(lucienne))\nforall x (Shallow(x, eugen) and Shallow(eugen, lucienne) -> Taking(x))\n\nReceptive(lucienne)\n\ntherefore Receptive(lucienne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The juliet mobilize the kellie. The juliet venture the kellie. The juliet is deficient. The juliet patronage the kellie. The kellie is numerous. The kellie is trying. The kellie patronage the juliet. If something is desiccated then it patronage the kellie. If something mobilize the juliet then the juliet is numerous. If something is desiccated and it venture the juliet then it is trying. If something is trying then it venture the juliet. If something mobilize the kellie and it is numerous then it venture the juliet. If something patronage the kellie and it is deficient then the kellie mobilize the juliet. If something mobilize the kellie and the kellie is trying then the kellie is deficient. If something patronage the juliet and the juliet patronage the kellie then it is deficient. The juliet does not chase the kellie.", "logic": "\nMobilize(juliet, kellie)\nVenture(juliet, kellie)\nDeficient(juliet)\nPatronage(juliet, kellie)\nNumerous(kellie)\nTrying(kellie)\nPatronage(kellie, juliet)\nforall x (Desiccated(x) -> Patronage(x, kellie))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, juliet) -> Numerous(juliet))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and Venture(x, juliet) -> Trying(x))\nforall x (Trying(x) -> Venture(x, juliet))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, kellie) and Numerous(x) -> Venture(x, juliet))\nforall x (Patronage(x, kellie) and Deficient(x) -> Mobilize(kellie, juliet))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, kellie) and Trying(kellie) -> Deficient(kellie))\nforall x (Patronage(x, juliet) and Patronage(juliet, kellie) -> Deficient(x))\n\nnot Mobilize(juliet, kellie)\n\ntherefore Mobilize(juliet, kellie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The melly imbibe the goldy. The melly solo the goldy. The melly is highland. The melly hyphen the goldy. The goldy is stylized. The goldy is chilly. The goldy hyphen the melly. If something is divided then it hyphen the goldy. If something imbibe the melly then the melly is stylized. If something is divided and it solo the melly then it is chilly. If something is chilly then it solo the melly. If something imbibe the goldy and it is stylized then it solo the melly. If something hyphen the goldy and it is highland then the goldy imbibe the melly. If something imbibe the goldy and the goldy is chilly then the goldy is highland. If something hyphen the melly and the melly hyphen the goldy then it is highland. The goldy imbibe the melly.", "logic": "\nImbibe(melly, goldy)\nSolo(melly, goldy)\nHighland(melly)\nHyphen(melly, goldy)\nStylized(goldy)\nChilly(goldy)\nHyphen(goldy, melly)\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Hyphen(x, goldy))\nforall x (Imbibe(x, melly) -> Stylized(melly))\nforall x (Divided(x) and Solo(x, melly) -> Chilly(x))\nforall x (Chilly(x) -> Solo(x, melly))\nforall x (Imbibe(x, goldy) and Stylized(x) -> Solo(x, melly))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, goldy) and Highland(x) -> Imbibe(goldy, melly))\nforall x (Imbibe(x, goldy) and Chilly(goldy) -> Highland(goldy))\nforall x (Hyphen(x, melly) and Hyphen(melly, goldy) -> Highland(x))\n\nImbibe(goldy, melly)\n\nHyphen(melly, goldy) and Highland(melly) and forall x (Hyphen(x, goldy) and Highland(x) -> Imbibe(goldy, melly)) -> therefore Imbibe(goldy, melly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The phillis shuffle the eyde. The phillis recast the eyde. The phillis is bizonal. The phillis carom the eyde. The eyde is exogenic. The eyde is vagile. The eyde carom the phillis. If something is overheated then it carom the eyde. If something shuffle the phillis then the phillis is exogenic. If something is overheated and it recast the phillis then it is vagile. If something is vagile then it recast the phillis. If something shuffle the eyde and it is exogenic then it recast the phillis. If something carom the eyde and it is bizonal then the eyde shuffle the phillis. If something shuffle the eyde and the eyde is vagile then the eyde is bizonal. If something carom the phillis and the phillis carom the eyde then it is bizonal. The eyde does not chase the phillis.", "logic": "\nShuffle(phillis, eyde)\nRecast(phillis, eyde)\nBizonal(phillis)\nCarom(phillis, eyde)\nExogenic(eyde)\nVagile(eyde)\nCarom(eyde, phillis)\nforall x (Overheated(x) -> Carom(x, eyde))\nforall x (Shuffle(x, phillis) -> Exogenic(phillis))\nforall x (Overheated(x) and Recast(x, phillis) -> Vagile(x))\nforall x (Vagile(x) -> Recast(x, phillis))\nforall x (Shuffle(x, eyde) and Exogenic(x) -> Recast(x, phillis))\nforall x (Carom(x, eyde) and Bizonal(x) -> Shuffle(eyde, phillis))\nforall x (Shuffle(x, eyde) and Vagile(eyde) -> Bizonal(eyde))\nforall x (Carom(x, phillis) and Carom(phillis, eyde) -> Bizonal(x))\n\nnot Shuffle(eyde, phillis)\n\nCarom(phillis, eyde) and Bizonal(phillis) and forall x (Carom(x, eyde) and Bizonal(x) -> Shuffle(eyde, phillis)) -> therefore Shuffle(eyde, phillis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The bren deafen the wilow. The bren drip the wilow. The bren is spic. The bren misdeliver the wilow. The wilow is joking. The wilow is mosstone. The wilow misdeliver the bren. If something is boisterous then it misdeliver the wilow. If something deafen the bren then the bren is joking. If something is boisterous and it drip the bren then it is mosstone. If something is mosstone then it drip the bren. If something deafen the wilow and it is joking then it drip the bren. If something misdeliver the wilow and it is spic then the wilow deafen the bren. If something deafen the wilow and the wilow is mosstone then the wilow is spic. If something misdeliver the bren and the bren misdeliver the wilow then it is spic. The bren is joking.", "logic": "\nDeafen(bren, wilow)\nDrip(bren, wilow)\nSpic(bren)\nMisdeliver(bren, wilow)\nJoking(wilow)\nMosstone(wilow)\nMisdeliver(wilow, bren)\nforall x (Boisterous(x) -> Misdeliver(x, wilow))\nforall x (Deafen(x, bren) -> Joking(bren))\nforall x (Boisterous(x) and Drip(x, bren) -> Mosstone(x))\nforall x (Mosstone(x) -> Drip(x, bren))\nforall x (Deafen(x, wilow) and Joking(x) -> Drip(x, bren))\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, wilow) and Spic(x) -> Deafen(wilow, bren))\nforall x (Deafen(x, wilow) and Mosstone(wilow) -> Spic(wilow))\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, bren) and Misdeliver(bren, wilow) -> Spic(x))\n\nJoking(bren)\n\nMisdeliver(bren, wilow) and Spic(bren) and forall x (Misdeliver(x, wilow) and Spic(x) -> Deafen(wilow, bren)) -> therefore Deafen(wilow, bren) Deafen(wilow, bren) and forall x (Deafen(x, bren) -> Joking(bren)) -> therefore Joking(bren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The nerissa pock the konstanze. The nerissa bosom the konstanze. The nerissa is doleful. The nerissa demist the konstanze. The konstanze is violet. The konstanze is hydroponic. The konstanze demist the nerissa. If something is natural then it demist the konstanze. If something pock the nerissa then the nerissa is violet. If something is natural and it bosom the nerissa then it is hydroponic. If something is hydroponic then it bosom the nerissa. If something pock the konstanze and it is violet then it bosom the nerissa. If something demist the konstanze and it is doleful then the konstanze pock the nerissa. If something pock the konstanze and the konstanze is hydroponic then the konstanze is doleful. If something demist the nerissa and the nerissa demist the konstanze then it is doleful. The nerissa is not violet.", "logic": "\nPock(nerissa, konstanze)\nBosom(nerissa, konstanze)\nDoleful(nerissa)\nDemist(nerissa, konstanze)\nViolet(konstanze)\nHydroponic(konstanze)\nDemist(konstanze, nerissa)\nforall x (Natural(x) -> Demist(x, konstanze))\nforall x (Pock(x, nerissa) -> Violet(nerissa))\nforall x (Natural(x) and Bosom(x, nerissa) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) -> Bosom(x, nerissa))\nforall x (Pock(x, konstanze) and Violet(x) -> Bosom(x, nerissa))\nforall x (Demist(x, konstanze) and Doleful(x) -> Pock(konstanze, nerissa))\nforall x (Pock(x, konstanze) and Hydroponic(konstanze) -> Doleful(konstanze))\nforall x (Demist(x, nerissa) and Demist(nerissa, konstanze) -> Doleful(x))\n\nnot Violet(nerissa)\n\nDemist(nerissa, konstanze) and Doleful(nerissa) and forall x (Demist(x, konstanze) and Doleful(x) -> Pock(konstanze, nerissa)) -> therefore Pock(konstanze, nerissa) Pock(konstanze, nerissa) and forall x (Pock(x, nerissa) -> Violet(nerissa)) -> therefore Violet(nerissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The jeanna classicize the lavina. The jeanna predicate the lavina. The jeanna is lendable. The jeanna jactitate the lavina. The lavina is stannic. The lavina is elderly. The lavina jactitate the jeanna. If something is piggy then it jactitate the lavina. If something classicize the jeanna then the jeanna is stannic. If something is piggy and it predicate the jeanna then it is elderly. If something is elderly then it predicate the jeanna. If something classicize the lavina and it is stannic then it predicate the jeanna. If something jactitate the lavina and it is lendable then the lavina classicize the jeanna. If something classicize the lavina and the lavina is elderly then the lavina is lendable. If something jactitate the jeanna and the jeanna jactitate the lavina then it is lendable. The jeanna predicate the jeanna.", "logic": "\nClassicize(jeanna, lavina)\nPredicate(jeanna, lavina)\nLendable(jeanna)\nJactitate(jeanna, lavina)\nStannic(lavina)\nElderly(lavina)\nJactitate(lavina, jeanna)\nforall x (Piggy(x) -> Jactitate(x, lavina))\nforall x (Classicize(x, jeanna) -> Stannic(jeanna))\nforall x (Piggy(x) and Predicate(x, jeanna) -> Elderly(x))\nforall x (Elderly(x) -> Predicate(x, jeanna))\nforall x (Classicize(x, lavina) and Stannic(x) -> Predicate(x, jeanna))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, lavina) and Lendable(x) -> Classicize(lavina, jeanna))\nforall x (Classicize(x, lavina) and Elderly(lavina) -> Lendable(lavina))\nforall x (Jactitate(x, jeanna) and Jactitate(jeanna, lavina) -> Lendable(x))\n\nPredicate(jeanna, jeanna)\n\nJactitate(jeanna, lavina) and Lendable(jeanna) and forall x (Jactitate(x, lavina) and Lendable(x) -> Classicize(lavina, jeanna)) -> therefore Classicize(lavina, jeanna) Classicize(lavina, jeanna) and forall x (Classicize(x, jeanna) -> Stannic(jeanna)) -> therefore Stannic(jeanna) Classicize(jeanna, lavina) and Stannic(jeanna) and forall x (Classicize(x, lavina) and Stannic(x) -> Predicate(x, jeanna)) -> therefore Predicate(jeanna, jeanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The marielle team the devonne. The marielle disoblige the devonne. The marielle is ovular. The marielle redo the devonne. The devonne is avuncular. The devonne is thready. The devonne redo the marielle. If something is roan then it redo the devonne. If something team the marielle then the marielle is avuncular. If something is roan and it disoblige the marielle then it is thready. If something is thready then it disoblige the marielle. If something team the devonne and it is avuncular then it disoblige the marielle. If something redo the devonne and it is ovular then the devonne team the marielle. If something team the devonne and the devonne is thready then the devonne is ovular. If something redo the marielle and the marielle redo the devonne then it is ovular. The marielle does not eat the marielle.", "logic": "\nTeam(marielle, devonne)\nDisoblige(marielle, devonne)\nOvular(marielle)\nRedo(marielle, devonne)\nAvuncular(devonne)\nThready(devonne)\nRedo(devonne, marielle)\nforall x (Roan(x) -> Redo(x, devonne))\nforall x (Team(x, marielle) -> Avuncular(marielle))\nforall x (Roan(x) and Disoblige(x, marielle) -> Thready(x))\nforall x (Thready(x) -> Disoblige(x, marielle))\nforall x (Team(x, devonne) and Avuncular(x) -> Disoblige(x, marielle))\nforall x (Redo(x, devonne) and Ovular(x) -> Team(devonne, marielle))\nforall x (Team(x, devonne) and Thready(devonne) -> Ovular(devonne))\nforall x (Redo(x, marielle) and Redo(marielle, devonne) -> Ovular(x))\n\nnot Disoblige(marielle, marielle)\n\nRedo(marielle, devonne) and Ovular(marielle) and forall x (Redo(x, devonne) and Ovular(x) -> Team(devonne, marielle)) -> therefore Team(devonne, marielle) Team(devonne, marielle) and forall x (Team(x, marielle) -> Avuncular(marielle)) -> therefore Avuncular(marielle) Team(marielle, devonne) and Avuncular(marielle) and forall x (Team(x, devonne) and Avuncular(x) -> Disoblige(x, marielle)) -> therefore Disoblige(marielle, marielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The sloane ditch the hall. The sloane conn the hall. The sloane is dewy. The sloane dally the hall. The hall is attested. The hall is welcome. The hall dally the sloane. If something is nubile then it dally the hall. If something ditch the sloane then the sloane is attested. If something is nubile and it conn the sloane then it is welcome. If something is welcome then it conn the sloane. If something ditch the hall and it is attested then it conn the sloane. If something dally the hall and it is dewy then the hall ditch the sloane. If something ditch the hall and the hall is welcome then the hall is dewy. If something dally the sloane and the sloane dally the hall then it is dewy. The hall does not need the hall.", "logic": "\nDitch(sloane, hall)\nConn(sloane, hall)\nDewy(sloane)\nDally(sloane, hall)\nAttested(hall)\nWelcome(hall)\nDally(hall, sloane)\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Dally(x, hall))\nforall x (Ditch(x, sloane) -> Attested(sloane))\nforall x (Nubile(x) and Conn(x, sloane) -> Welcome(x))\nforall x (Welcome(x) -> Conn(x, sloane))\nforall x (Ditch(x, hall) and Attested(x) -> Conn(x, sloane))\nforall x (Dally(x, hall) and Dewy(x) -> Ditch(hall, sloane))\nforall x (Ditch(x, hall) and Welcome(hall) -> Dewy(hall))\nforall x (Dally(x, sloane) and Dally(sloane, hall) -> Dewy(x))\n\nnot Dally(hall, hall)\n\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Dally(x, hall)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The gwyn banter the julianne. The gwyn capitalise the julianne. The gwyn is sneak. The gwyn acetify the julianne. The julianne is bimodal. The julianne is pretorial. The julianne acetify the gwyn. If something is prewar then it acetify the julianne. If something banter the gwyn then the gwyn is bimodal. If something is prewar and it capitalise the gwyn then it is pretorial. If something is pretorial then it capitalise the gwyn. If something banter the julianne and it is bimodal then it capitalise the gwyn. If something acetify the julianne and it is sneak then the julianne banter the gwyn. If something banter the julianne and the julianne is pretorial then the julianne is sneak. If something acetify the gwyn and the gwyn acetify the julianne then it is sneak. The gwyn is pretorial.", "logic": "\nBanter(gwyn, julianne)\nCapitalise(gwyn, julianne)\nSneak(gwyn)\nAcetify(gwyn, julianne)\nBimodal(julianne)\nPretorial(julianne)\nAcetify(julianne, gwyn)\nforall x (Prewar(x) -> Acetify(x, julianne))\nforall x (Banter(x, gwyn) -> Bimodal(gwyn))\nforall x (Prewar(x) and Capitalise(x, gwyn) -> Pretorial(x))\nforall x (Pretorial(x) -> Capitalise(x, gwyn))\nforall x (Banter(x, julianne) and Bimodal(x) -> Capitalise(x, gwyn))\nforall x (Acetify(x, julianne) and Sneak(x) -> Banter(julianne, gwyn))\nforall x (Banter(x, julianne) and Pretorial(julianne) -> Sneak(julianne))\nforall x (Acetify(x, gwyn) and Acetify(gwyn, julianne) -> Sneak(x))\n\nPretorial(gwyn)\n\nforall x (Prewar(x) and Capitalise(x, gwyn) -> Pretorial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The minta sulfate the nedda. The minta presage the nedda. The minta is palatable. The minta acquit the nedda. The nedda is ebon. The nedda is bowelless. The nedda acquit the minta. If something is overlooked then it acquit the nedda. If something sulfate the minta then the minta is ebon. If something is overlooked and it presage the minta then it is bowelless. If something is bowelless then it presage the minta. If something sulfate the nedda and it is ebon then it presage the minta. If something acquit the nedda and it is palatable then the nedda sulfate the minta. If something sulfate the nedda and the nedda is bowelless then the nedda is palatable. If something acquit the minta and the minta acquit the nedda then it is palatable. The nedda does not chase the nedda.", "logic": "\nSulfate(minta, nedda)\nPresage(minta, nedda)\nPalatable(minta)\nAcquit(minta, nedda)\nEbon(nedda)\nBowelless(nedda)\nAcquit(nedda, minta)\nforall x (Overlooked(x) -> Acquit(x, nedda))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, minta) -> Ebon(minta))\nforall x (Overlooked(x) and Presage(x, minta) -> Bowelless(x))\nforall x (Bowelless(x) -> Presage(x, minta))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, nedda) and Ebon(x) -> Presage(x, minta))\nforall x (Acquit(x, nedda) and Palatable(x) -> Sulfate(nedda, minta))\nforall x (Sulfate(x, nedda) and Bowelless(nedda) -> Palatable(nedda))\nforall x (Acquit(x, minta) and Acquit(minta, nedda) -> Palatable(x))\n\nnot Sulfate(nedda, nedda)\n\nnot Sulfate(nedda, nedda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The ofelia peptize the katinka. The ofelia rust the katinka. The ofelia is shaved. The ofelia gaggle the katinka. The katinka is rubbery. The katinka is roving. The katinka gaggle the ofelia. If something is vegetal then it gaggle the katinka. If something peptize the ofelia then the ofelia is rubbery. If something is vegetal and it rust the ofelia then it is roving. If something is roving then it rust the ofelia. If something peptize the katinka and it is rubbery then it rust the ofelia. If something gaggle the katinka and it is shaved then the katinka peptize the ofelia. If something peptize the katinka and the katinka is roving then the katinka is shaved. If something gaggle the ofelia and the ofelia gaggle the katinka then it is shaved. The ofelia gaggle the ofelia.", "logic": "\nPeptize(ofelia, katinka)\nRust(ofelia, katinka)\nShaved(ofelia)\nGaggle(ofelia, katinka)\nRubbery(katinka)\nRoving(katinka)\nGaggle(katinka, ofelia)\nforall x (Vegetal(x) -> Gaggle(x, katinka))\nforall x (Peptize(x, ofelia) -> Rubbery(ofelia))\nforall x (Vegetal(x) and Rust(x, ofelia) -> Roving(x))\nforall x (Roving(x) -> Rust(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Peptize(x, katinka) and Rubbery(x) -> Rust(x, ofelia))\nforall x (Gaggle(x, katinka) and Shaved(x) -> Peptize(katinka, ofelia))\nforall x (Peptize(x, katinka) and Roving(katinka) -> Shaved(katinka))\nforall x (Gaggle(x, ofelia) and Gaggle(ofelia, katinka) -> Shaved(x))\n\nGaggle(ofelia, ofelia)\n\nGaggle(ofelia, ofelia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The suzie burglarize the melony. The suzie abstain the melony. The suzie is acquainted. The suzie glass the melony. The melony is multiform. The melony is aldermanic. The melony glass the suzie. If something is iron then it glass the melony. If something burglarize the suzie then the suzie is multiform. If something is iron and it abstain the suzie then it is aldermanic. If something is aldermanic then it abstain the suzie. If something burglarize the melony and it is multiform then it abstain the suzie. If something glass the melony and it is acquainted then the melony burglarize the suzie. If something burglarize the melony and the melony is aldermanic then the melony is acquainted. If something glass the suzie and the suzie glass the melony then it is acquainted. The suzie is not iron.", "logic": "\nBurglarize(suzie, melony)\nAbstain(suzie, melony)\nAcquainted(suzie)\nGlass(suzie, melony)\nMultiform(melony)\nAldermanic(melony)\nGlass(melony, suzie)\nforall x (Iron(x) -> Glass(x, melony))\nforall x (Burglarize(x, suzie) -> Multiform(suzie))\nforall x (Iron(x) and Abstain(x, suzie) -> Aldermanic(x))\nforall x (Aldermanic(x) -> Abstain(x, suzie))\nforall x (Burglarize(x, melony) and Multiform(x) -> Abstain(x, suzie))\nforall x (Glass(x, melony) and Acquainted(x) -> Burglarize(melony, suzie))\nforall x (Burglarize(x, melony) and Aldermanic(melony) -> Acquainted(melony))\nforall x (Glass(x, suzie) and Glass(suzie, melony) -> Acquainted(x))\n\nnot Iron(suzie)\n\nnot Iron(suzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The harli ally the elie. The harli scoot the elie. The harli is cismontane. The harli overpower the elie. The elie is brimless. The elie is valved. The elie overpower the harli. If something is polygamous then it overpower the elie. If something ally the harli then the harli is brimless. If something is polygamous and it scoot the harli then it is valved. If something is valved then it scoot the harli. If something ally the elie and it is brimless then it scoot the harli. If something overpower the elie and it is cismontane then the elie ally the harli. If something ally the elie and the elie is valved then the elie is cismontane. If something overpower the harli and the harli overpower the elie then it is cismontane. The harli is round.", "logic": "\nAlly(harli, elie)\nScoot(harli, elie)\nCismontane(harli)\nOverpower(harli, elie)\nBrimless(elie)\nValved(elie)\nOverpower(elie, harli)\nforall x (Polygamous(x) -> Overpower(x, elie))\nforall x (Ally(x, harli) -> Brimless(harli))\nforall x (Polygamous(x) and Scoot(x, harli) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Valved(x) -> Scoot(x, harli))\nforall x (Ally(x, elie) and Brimless(x) -> Scoot(x, harli))\nforall x (Overpower(x, elie) and Cismontane(x) -> Ally(elie, harli))\nforall x (Ally(x, elie) and Valved(elie) -> Cismontane(elie))\nforall x (Overpower(x, harli) and Overpower(harli, elie) -> Cismontane(x))\n\nRound(harli)\n\nRound(harli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The jeanette sermonise the madalena. The jeanette wink the madalena. The jeanette is wizened. The jeanette unspell the madalena. The madalena is brimming. The madalena is famed. The madalena unspell the jeanette. If something is shoed then it unspell the madalena. If something sermonise the jeanette then the jeanette is brimming. If something is shoed and it wink the jeanette then it is famed. If something is famed then it wink the jeanette. If something sermonise the madalena and it is brimming then it wink the jeanette. If something unspell the madalena and it is wizened then the madalena sermonise the jeanette. If something sermonise the madalena and the madalena is famed then the madalena is wizened. If something unspell the jeanette and the jeanette unspell the madalena then it is wizened. The jeanette does not chase the jeanette.", "logic": "\nSermonise(jeanette, madalena)\nWink(jeanette, madalena)\nWizened(jeanette)\nUnspell(jeanette, madalena)\nBrimming(madalena)\nFamed(madalena)\nUnspell(madalena, jeanette)\nforall x (Shoed(x) -> Unspell(x, madalena))\nforall x (Sermonise(x, jeanette) -> Brimming(jeanette))\nforall x (Shoed(x) and Wink(x, jeanette) -> Famed(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) -> Wink(x, jeanette))\nforall x (Sermonise(x, madalena) and Brimming(x) -> Wink(x, jeanette))\nforall x (Unspell(x, madalena) and Wizened(x) -> Sermonise(madalena, jeanette))\nforall x (Sermonise(x, madalena) and Famed(madalena) -> Wizened(madalena))\nforall x (Unspell(x, jeanette) and Unspell(jeanette, madalena) -> Wizened(x))\n\nnot Sermonise(jeanette, jeanette)\n\nnot Sermonise(jeanette, jeanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "The wye chloroform the tait. The wye tweeze the tait. The wye is archaean. The wye yield the tait. The tait is eulogistic. The tait is gormless. The tait yield the wye. If something is vesicular then it yield the tait. If something chloroform the wye then the wye is eulogistic. If something is vesicular and it tweeze the wye then it is gormless. If something is gormless then it tweeze the wye. If something chloroform the tait and it is eulogistic then it tweeze the wye. If something yield the tait and it is archaean then the tait chloroform the wye. If something chloroform the tait and the tait is gormless then the tait is archaean. If something yield the wye and the wye yield the tait then it is archaean. The tait is round.", "logic": "\nChloroform(wye, tait)\nTweeze(wye, tait)\nArchaean(wye)\nYield(wye, tait)\nEulogistic(tait)\nGormless(tait)\nYield(tait, wye)\nforall x (Vesicular(x) -> Yield(x, tait))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, wye) -> Eulogistic(wye))\nforall x (Vesicular(x) and Tweeze(x, wye) -> Gormless(x))\nforall x (Gormless(x) -> Tweeze(x, wye))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, tait) and Eulogistic(x) -> Tweeze(x, wye))\nforall x (Yield(x, tait) and Archaean(x) -> Chloroform(tait, wye))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, tait) and Gormless(tait) -> Archaean(tait))\nforall x (Yield(x, wye) and Yield(wye, tait) -> Archaean(x))\n\nRound(tait)\n\nRound(tait) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-690"} {"premises": "Bellina is based. Raynard is based. Sande is based. If someone is based then they are unbearable. If someone is thriving and autologous then they are unbearable. Sande is based.", "logic": "\nBased(bellina)\nBased(raynard)\nBased(sande)\nforall x (Based(x) -> Unbearable(x))\nforall x (Thriving(x) and Autologous(x) -> Unbearable(x))\n\nBased(sande)\n\ntherefore Based(sande)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Sebastien is bladdery. Imelda is bladdery. Netty is bladdery. If someone is bladdery then they are pathologic. If someone is stemmatic and home then they are pathologic. Sebastien is not bladdery.", "logic": "\nBladdery(sebastien)\nBladdery(imelda)\nBladdery(netty)\nforall x (Bladdery(x) -> Pathologic(x))\nforall x (Stemmatic(x) and Home(x) -> Pathologic(x))\n\nnot Bladdery(sebastien)\n\ntherefore Bladdery(sebastien)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Morry is unartistic. Viki is unartistic. Andri is unartistic. If someone is unartistic then they are passable. If someone is humanlike and grizzly then they are passable. Viki is passable.", "logic": "\nUnartistic(morry)\nUnartistic(viki)\nUnartistic(andri)\nforall x (Unartistic(x) -> Passable(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) and Grizzly(x) -> Passable(x))\n\nPassable(viki)\n\nUnartistic(viki) and forall x (Unartistic(x) -> Passable(x)) -> therefore Passable(viki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Hewe is livelong. Ruthie is livelong. Walter is livelong. If someone is livelong then they are distant. If someone is laid and surface then they are distant. Walter is not distant.", "logic": "\nLivelong(hewe)\nLivelong(ruthie)\nLivelong(walter)\nforall x (Livelong(x) -> Distant(x))\nforall x (Laid(x) and Surface(x) -> Distant(x))\n\nnot Distant(walter)\n\nLivelong(walter) and forall x (Livelong(x) -> Distant(x)) -> therefore Distant(walter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Sherilyn is poetic. Nathanael is poetic. Verla is poetic. If someone is poetic then they are negotiable. If someone is monotonous and astral then they are negotiable. Sherilyn is not astral.", "logic": "\nPoetic(sherilyn)\nPoetic(nathanael)\nPoetic(verla)\nforall x (Poetic(x) -> Negotiable(x))\nforall x (Monotonous(x) and Astral(x) -> Negotiable(x))\n\nnot Astral(sherilyn)\n\nnot Astral(sherilyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Uri is brawny. Rhodie is brawny. Kenneth is brawny. If someone is brawny then they are hoarse. If someone is inanimate and leftist then they are hoarse. Rhodie is cold.", "logic": "\nBrawny(uri)\nBrawny(rhodie)\nBrawny(kenneth)\nforall x (Brawny(x) -> Hoarse(x))\nforall x (Inanimate(x) and Leftist(x) -> Hoarse(x))\n\nCold(rhodie)\n\nCold(rhodie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Benson is murdered. Neal is murdered. Sherri is murdered. If someone is murdered then they are blazing. If someone is monoclinic and repressing then they are blazing. Neal is not quiet.", "logic": "\nMurdered(benson)\nMurdered(neal)\nMurdered(sherri)\nforall x (Murdered(x) -> Blazing(x))\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) and Repressing(x) -> Blazing(x))\n\nnot Quiet(neal)\n\nnot Quiet(neal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "Rena is awnless. Tricia is awnless. Gen is awnless. If someone is awnless then they are sintered. If someone is unpurified and supplicant then they are sintered. Rena is cold.", "logic": "\nAwnless(rena)\nAwnless(tricia)\nAwnless(gen)\nforall x (Awnless(x) -> Sintered(x))\nforall x (Unpurified(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Sintered(x))\n\nCold(rena)\n\nCold(rena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2400"} {"premises": "The selina is nephritic. The selina is dreadful. The selina is sensorial. The selina is imbecilic. The selina is sarcastic. If someone is imbecilic and not nephritic then they are not sensorial. If someone is nephritic then they are sensorial. The selina is nephritic.", "logic": "\nNephritic(selina)\nDreadful(selina)\nSensorial(selina)\nImbecilic(selina)\nSarcastic(selina)\nforall x (Imbecilic(x) and not Nephritic(x) -> not Sensorial(x))\nforall x (Nephritic(x) -> Sensorial(x))\n\nNephritic(selina)\n\ntherefore Nephritic(selina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-797"} {"premises": "The caesar is speckless. The caesar is edwardian. The caesar is gallic. The caesar is biddable. The caesar is lentiform. If someone is biddable and not speckless then they are not gallic. If someone is speckless then they are gallic. The caesar is not lentiform.", "logic": "\nSpeckless(caesar)\nEdwardian(caesar)\nGallic(caesar)\nBiddable(caesar)\nLentiform(caesar)\nforall x (Biddable(x) and not Speckless(x) -> not Gallic(x))\nforall x (Speckless(x) -> Gallic(x))\n\nnot Lentiform(caesar)\n\ntherefore Lentiform(caesar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-797"} {"premises": "The sanders is ritardando. The sanders is groundless. The sanders is auriculate. The sanders is softish. The sanders is thousand. If someone is softish and not ritardando then they are not auriculate. If someone is ritardando then they are auriculate. The sanders does not like the sanders.", "logic": "\nRitardando(sanders)\nGroundless(sanders)\nAuriculate(sanders)\nSoftish(sanders)\nThousand(sanders)\nforall x (Softish(x) and not Ritardando(x) -> not Auriculate(x))\nforall x (Ritardando(x) -> Auriculate(x))\n\nnot Likes(sanders, sanders)\n\nnot Likes(sanders, sanders) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-797"} {"premises": "The rey is thready. The rey is andorran. The rey is penumbral. The rey is sonant. The rey is stoneless. If someone is sonant and not thready then they are not penumbral. If someone is thready then they are penumbral. The rey eats the rey.", "logic": "\nThready(rey)\nAndorran(rey)\nPenumbral(rey)\nSonant(rey)\nStoneless(rey)\nforall x (Sonant(x) and not Thready(x) -> not Penumbral(x))\nforall x (Thready(x) -> Penumbral(x))\n\nEats(rey, rey)\n\nEats(rey, rey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-797"} {"premises": "The seline autotomize the gwendolen. The seline is clarion. The seline autotomize the nanci. The nanci is arboresque. The nanci reline the gwendolen. The nanci autotomize the seline. The gwendolen autotomize the nanci. If something is arboresque then it autotomize the gwendolen. If something autotomize the nanci and it reline the seline then the nanci reline the gwendolen. If the seline autotomize the nanci and the seline autotomize the nanci then the nanci autotomize the gwendolen. If the nanci autotomize the seline then the seline autotomize the nanci. If something autotomize the seline and it autotomize the gwendolen then the gwendolen autotomize the nanci. If something is dual then it autotomize the seline. If something reline the nanci then it autotomize the gwendolen. If something autotomize the gwendolen and it reline the gwendolen then it reline the nanci. The nanci autotomize the seline.", "logic": "\nAutotomize(seline, gwendolen)\nClarion(seline)\nAutotomize(seline, nanci)\nArboresque(nanci)\nReline(nanci, gwendolen)\nAutotomize(nanci, seline)\nAutotomize(gwendolen, nanci)\nforall x (Arboresque(x) -> Autotomize(x, gwendolen))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, nanci) and Reline(x, seline) -> Reline(nanci, gwendolen))\nAutotomize(seline, nanci) and Autotomize(seline, nanci) -> Autotomize(nanci, gwendolen)\nAutotomize(nanci, seline) -> Autotomize(seline, nanci)\nforall x (Autotomize(x, seline) and Autotomize(x, gwendolen) -> Autotomize(gwendolen, nanci))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> Autotomize(x, seline))\nforall x (Reline(x, nanci) -> Autotomize(x, gwendolen))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, gwendolen) and Reline(x, gwendolen) -> Reline(x, nanci))\n\nAutotomize(nanci, seline)\n\ntherefore Autotomize(nanci, seline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The lurline saddle the penelope. The lurline is bogus. The lurline chrome the alec. The alec is chartered. The alec admix the penelope. The alec chrome the lurline. The penelope chrome the alec. If something is chartered then it saddle the penelope. If something chrome the alec and it admix the lurline then the alec admix the penelope. If the lurline chrome the alec and the lurline saddle the alec then the alec saddle the penelope. If the alec saddle the lurline then the lurline saddle the alec. If something chrome the lurline and it saddle the penelope then the penelope saddle the alec. If something is numerous then it saddle the lurline. If something admix the alec then it chrome the penelope. If something saddle the penelope and it admix the penelope then it admix the alec. The lurline is not bogus.", "logic": "\nSaddle(lurline, penelope)\nBogus(lurline)\nChrome(lurline, alec)\nChartered(alec)\nAdmix(alec, penelope)\nChrome(alec, lurline)\nChrome(penelope, alec)\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Saddle(x, penelope))\nforall x (Chrome(x, alec) and Admix(x, lurline) -> Admix(alec, penelope))\nChrome(lurline, alec) and Saddle(lurline, alec) -> Saddle(alec, penelope)\nSaddle(alec, lurline) -> Saddle(lurline, alec)\nforall x (Chrome(x, lurline) and Saddle(x, penelope) -> Saddle(penelope, alec))\nforall x (Numerous(x) -> Saddle(x, lurline))\nforall x (Admix(x, alec) -> Chrome(x, penelope))\nforall x (Saddle(x, penelope) and Admix(x, penelope) -> Admix(x, alec))\n\nnot Bogus(lurline)\n\ntherefore Bogus(lurline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The mugsy defect the leena. The mugsy is sensuous. The mugsy rejuvenate the wat. The wat is hastate. The wat barbecue the leena. The wat rejuvenate the mugsy. The leena rejuvenate the wat. If something is hastate then it defect the leena. If something rejuvenate the wat and it barbecue the mugsy then the wat barbecue the leena. If the mugsy rejuvenate the wat and the mugsy defect the wat then the wat defect the leena. If the wat defect the mugsy then the mugsy defect the wat. If something rejuvenate the mugsy and it defect the leena then the leena defect the wat. If something is malawian then it defect the mugsy. If something barbecue the wat then it rejuvenate the leena. If something defect the leena and it barbecue the leena then it barbecue the wat. The wat defect the leena.", "logic": "\nDefect(mugsy, leena)\nSensuous(mugsy)\nRejuvenate(mugsy, wat)\nHastate(wat)\nBarbecue(wat, leena)\nRejuvenate(wat, mugsy)\nRejuvenate(leena, wat)\nforall x (Hastate(x) -> Defect(x, leena))\nforall x (Rejuvenate(x, wat) and Barbecue(x, mugsy) -> Barbecue(wat, leena))\nRejuvenate(mugsy, wat) and Defect(mugsy, wat) -> Defect(wat, leena)\nDefect(wat, mugsy) -> Defect(mugsy, wat)\nforall x (Rejuvenate(x, mugsy) and Defect(x, leena) -> Defect(leena, wat))\nforall x (Malawian(x) -> Defect(x, mugsy))\nforall x (Barbecue(x, wat) -> Rejuvenate(x, leena))\nforall x (Defect(x, leena) and Barbecue(x, leena) -> Barbecue(x, wat))\n\nDefect(wat, leena)\n\nHastate(wat) and forall x (Hastate(x) -> Defect(x, leena)) -> therefore Defect(wat, leena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The judd demonetize the mufi. The judd is bacterioid. The judd jacklight the rivalee. The rivalee is indexical. The rivalee fecundate the mufi. The rivalee jacklight the judd. The mufi jacklight the rivalee. If something is indexical then it demonetize the mufi. If something jacklight the rivalee and it fecundate the judd then the rivalee fecundate the mufi. If the judd jacklight the rivalee and the judd demonetize the rivalee then the rivalee demonetize the mufi. If the rivalee demonetize the judd then the judd demonetize the rivalee. If something jacklight the judd and it demonetize the mufi then the mufi demonetize the rivalee. If something is apraxic then it demonetize the judd. If something fecundate the rivalee then it jacklight the mufi. If something demonetize the mufi and it fecundate the mufi then it fecundate the rivalee. The rivalee does not chase the mufi.", "logic": "\nDemonetize(judd, mufi)\nBacterioid(judd)\nJacklight(judd, rivalee)\nIndexical(rivalee)\nFecundate(rivalee, mufi)\nJacklight(rivalee, judd)\nJacklight(mufi, rivalee)\nforall x (Indexical(x) -> Demonetize(x, mufi))\nforall x (Jacklight(x, rivalee) and Fecundate(x, judd) -> Fecundate(rivalee, mufi))\nJacklight(judd, rivalee) and Demonetize(judd, rivalee) -> Demonetize(rivalee, mufi)\nDemonetize(rivalee, judd) -> Demonetize(judd, rivalee)\nforall x (Jacklight(x, judd) and Demonetize(x, mufi) -> Demonetize(mufi, rivalee))\nforall x (Apraxic(x) -> Demonetize(x, judd))\nforall x (Fecundate(x, rivalee) -> Jacklight(x, mufi))\nforall x (Demonetize(x, mufi) and Fecundate(x, mufi) -> Fecundate(x, rivalee))\n\nnot Demonetize(rivalee, mufi)\n\nIndexical(rivalee) and forall x (Indexical(x) -> Demonetize(x, mufi)) -> therefore Demonetize(rivalee, mufi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The fergus lighter the ripley. The fergus is viviparous. The fergus foxtrot the avrom. The avrom is wedded. The avrom vacate the ripley. The avrom foxtrot the fergus. The ripley foxtrot the avrom. If something is wedded then it lighter the ripley. If something foxtrot the avrom and it vacate the fergus then the avrom vacate the ripley. If the fergus foxtrot the avrom and the fergus lighter the avrom then the avrom lighter the ripley. If the avrom lighter the fergus then the fergus lighter the avrom. If something foxtrot the fergus and it lighter the ripley then the ripley lighter the avrom. If something is volumed then it lighter the fergus. If something vacate the avrom then it foxtrot the ripley. If something lighter the ripley and it vacate the ripley then it vacate the avrom. The ripley lighter the avrom.", "logic": "\nLighter(fergus, ripley)\nViviparous(fergus)\nFoxtrot(fergus, avrom)\nWedded(avrom)\nVacate(avrom, ripley)\nFoxtrot(avrom, fergus)\nFoxtrot(ripley, avrom)\nforall x (Wedded(x) -> Lighter(x, ripley))\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, avrom) and Vacate(x, fergus) -> Vacate(avrom, ripley))\nFoxtrot(fergus, avrom) and Lighter(fergus, avrom) -> Lighter(avrom, ripley)\nLighter(avrom, fergus) -> Lighter(fergus, avrom)\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, fergus) and Lighter(x, ripley) -> Lighter(ripley, avrom))\nforall x (Volumed(x) -> Lighter(x, fergus))\nforall x (Vacate(x, avrom) -> Foxtrot(x, ripley))\nforall x (Lighter(x, ripley) and Vacate(x, ripley) -> Vacate(x, avrom))\n\nLighter(ripley, avrom)\n\nWedded(avrom) and forall x (Wedded(x) -> Lighter(x, ripley)) -> therefore Lighter(avrom, ripley) Foxtrot(avrom, fergus) and Lighter(avrom, ripley) and forall x (Foxtrot(x, fergus) and Lighter(x, ripley) -> Lighter(ripley, avrom)) -> therefore Lighter(ripley, avrom)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The pennie gloss the ronna. The pennie is capitalist. The pennie declare the jacintha. The jacintha is planless. The jacintha uncompress the ronna. The jacintha declare the pennie. The ronna declare the jacintha. If something is planless then it gloss the ronna. If something declare the jacintha and it uncompress the pennie then the jacintha uncompress the ronna. If the pennie declare the jacintha and the pennie gloss the jacintha then the jacintha gloss the ronna. If the jacintha gloss the pennie then the pennie gloss the jacintha. If something declare the pennie and it gloss the ronna then the ronna gloss the jacintha. If something is pycnotic then it gloss the pennie. If something uncompress the jacintha then it declare the ronna. If something gloss the ronna and it uncompress the ronna then it uncompress the jacintha. The ronna does not chase the jacintha.", "logic": "\nGloss(pennie, ronna)\nCapitalist(pennie)\nDeclare(pennie, jacintha)\nPlanless(jacintha)\nUncompress(jacintha, ronna)\nDeclare(jacintha, pennie)\nDeclare(ronna, jacintha)\nforall x (Planless(x) -> Gloss(x, ronna))\nforall x (Declare(x, jacintha) and Uncompress(x, pennie) -> Uncompress(jacintha, ronna))\nDeclare(pennie, jacintha) and Gloss(pennie, jacintha) -> Gloss(jacintha, ronna)\nGloss(jacintha, pennie) -> Gloss(pennie, jacintha)\nforall x (Declare(x, pennie) and Gloss(x, ronna) -> Gloss(ronna, jacintha))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Gloss(x, pennie))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, jacintha) -> Declare(x, ronna))\nforall x (Gloss(x, ronna) and Uncompress(x, ronna) -> Uncompress(x, jacintha))\n\nnot Gloss(ronna, jacintha)\n\nPlanless(jacintha) and forall x (Planless(x) -> Gloss(x, ronna)) -> therefore Gloss(jacintha, ronna) Declare(jacintha, pennie) and Gloss(jacintha, ronna) and forall x (Declare(x, pennie) and Gloss(x, ronna) -> Gloss(ronna, jacintha)) -> therefore Gloss(ronna, jacintha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The laryssa reface the bishop. The laryssa is epilithic. The laryssa bust the higgins. The higgins is scarlet. The higgins flash the bishop. The higgins bust the laryssa. The bishop bust the higgins. If something is scarlet then it reface the bishop. If something bust the higgins and it flash the laryssa then the higgins flash the bishop. If the laryssa bust the higgins and the laryssa reface the higgins then the higgins reface the bishop. If the higgins reface the laryssa then the laryssa reface the higgins. If something bust the laryssa and it reface the bishop then the bishop reface the higgins. If something is hyaloid then it reface the laryssa. If something flash the higgins then it bust the bishop. If something reface the bishop and it flash the bishop then it flash the higgins. The higgins bust the bishop.", "logic": "\nReface(laryssa, bishop)\nEpilithic(laryssa)\nBust(laryssa, higgins)\nScarlet(higgins)\nFlash(higgins, bishop)\nBust(higgins, laryssa)\nBust(bishop, higgins)\nforall x (Scarlet(x) -> Reface(x, bishop))\nforall x (Bust(x, higgins) and Flash(x, laryssa) -> Flash(higgins, bishop))\nBust(laryssa, higgins) and Reface(laryssa, higgins) -> Reface(higgins, bishop)\nReface(higgins, laryssa) -> Reface(laryssa, higgins)\nforall x (Bust(x, laryssa) and Reface(x, bishop) -> Reface(bishop, higgins))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) -> Reface(x, laryssa))\nforall x (Flash(x, higgins) -> Bust(x, bishop))\nforall x (Reface(x, bishop) and Flash(x, bishop) -> Flash(x, higgins))\n\nBust(higgins, bishop)\n\nScarlet(higgins) and forall x (Scarlet(x) -> Reface(x, bishop)) -> therefore Reface(higgins, bishop) Reface(higgins, bishop) and Flash(higgins, bishop) and forall x (Reface(x, bishop) and Flash(x, bishop) -> Flash(x, higgins)) -> therefore Flash(higgins, higgins) Flash(higgins, higgins) and forall x (Flash(x, higgins) -> Bust(x, bishop)) -> therefore Bust(higgins, bishop)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The lyndsay overdo the ferdie. The lyndsay is shaken. The lyndsay dote the dru. The dru is cataphatic. The dru thrash the ferdie. The dru dote the lyndsay. The ferdie dote the dru. If something is cataphatic then it overdo the ferdie. If something dote the dru and it thrash the lyndsay then the dru thrash the ferdie. If the lyndsay dote the dru and the lyndsay overdo the dru then the dru overdo the ferdie. If the dru overdo the lyndsay then the lyndsay overdo the dru. If something dote the lyndsay and it overdo the ferdie then the ferdie overdo the dru. If something is tuppeny then it overdo the lyndsay. If something thrash the dru then it dote the ferdie. If something overdo the ferdie and it thrash the ferdie then it thrash the dru. The dru does not see the ferdie.", "logic": "\nOverdo(lyndsay, ferdie)\nShaken(lyndsay)\nDote(lyndsay, dru)\nCataphatic(dru)\nThrash(dru, ferdie)\nDote(dru, lyndsay)\nDote(ferdie, dru)\nforall x (Cataphatic(x) -> Overdo(x, ferdie))\nforall x (Dote(x, dru) and Thrash(x, lyndsay) -> Thrash(dru, ferdie))\nDote(lyndsay, dru) and Overdo(lyndsay, dru) -> Overdo(dru, ferdie)\nOverdo(dru, lyndsay) -> Overdo(lyndsay, dru)\nforall x (Dote(x, lyndsay) and Overdo(x, ferdie) -> Overdo(ferdie, dru))\nforall x (Tuppeny(x) -> Overdo(x, lyndsay))\nforall x (Thrash(x, dru) -> Dote(x, ferdie))\nforall x (Overdo(x, ferdie) and Thrash(x, ferdie) -> Thrash(x, dru))\n\nnot Dote(dru, ferdie)\n\nCataphatic(dru) and forall x (Cataphatic(x) -> Overdo(x, ferdie)) -> therefore Overdo(dru, ferdie) Overdo(dru, ferdie) and Thrash(dru, ferdie) and forall x (Overdo(x, ferdie) and Thrash(x, ferdie) -> Thrash(x, dru)) -> therefore Thrash(dru, dru) Thrash(dru, dru) and forall x (Thrash(x, dru) -> Dote(x, ferdie)) -> therefore Dote(dru, ferdie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The leonie clatter the aileen. The leonie is supervised. The leonie solve the rhett. The rhett is forceful. The rhett befoul the aileen. The rhett solve the leonie. The aileen solve the rhett. If something is forceful then it clatter the aileen. If something solve the rhett and it befoul the leonie then the rhett befoul the aileen. If the leonie solve the rhett and the leonie clatter the rhett then the rhett clatter the aileen. If the rhett clatter the leonie then the leonie clatter the rhett. If something solve the leonie and it clatter the aileen then the aileen clatter the rhett. If something is permed then it clatter the leonie. If something befoul the rhett then it solve the aileen. If something clatter the aileen and it befoul the aileen then it befoul the rhett. The aileen does not see the aileen.", "logic": "\nClatter(leonie, aileen)\nSupervised(leonie)\nSolve(leonie, rhett)\nForceful(rhett)\nBefoul(rhett, aileen)\nSolve(rhett, leonie)\nSolve(aileen, rhett)\nforall x (Forceful(x) -> Clatter(x, aileen))\nforall x (Solve(x, rhett) and Befoul(x, leonie) -> Befoul(rhett, aileen))\nSolve(leonie, rhett) and Clatter(leonie, rhett) -> Clatter(rhett, aileen)\nClatter(rhett, leonie) -> Clatter(leonie, rhett)\nforall x (Solve(x, leonie) and Clatter(x, aileen) -> Clatter(aileen, rhett))\nforall x (Permed(x) -> Clatter(x, leonie))\nforall x (Befoul(x, rhett) -> Solve(x, aileen))\nforall x (Clatter(x, aileen) and Befoul(x, aileen) -> Befoul(x, rhett))\n\nnot Solve(aileen, aileen)\n\nforall x (Befoul(x, rhett) -> Solve(x, aileen)) <- forall x (Clatter(x, aileen) and Befoul(x, aileen) -> Befoul(x, rhett)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The kimbra front the marsh. The kimbra is fancy. The kimbra correct the tiphani. The tiphani is equable. The tiphani dishevel the marsh. The tiphani correct the kimbra. The marsh correct the tiphani. If something is equable then it front the marsh. If something correct the tiphani and it dishevel the kimbra then the tiphani dishevel the marsh. If the kimbra correct the tiphani and the kimbra front the tiphani then the tiphani front the marsh. If the tiphani front the kimbra then the kimbra front the tiphani. If something correct the kimbra and it front the marsh then the marsh front the tiphani. If something is liquid then it front the kimbra. If something dishevel the tiphani then it correct the marsh. If something front the marsh and it dishevel the marsh then it dishevel the tiphani. The kimbra front the tiphani.", "logic": "\nFront(kimbra, marsh)\nFancy(kimbra)\nCorrect(kimbra, tiphani)\nEquable(tiphani)\nDishevel(tiphani, marsh)\nCorrect(tiphani, kimbra)\nCorrect(marsh, tiphani)\nforall x (Equable(x) -> Front(x, marsh))\nforall x (Correct(x, tiphani) and Dishevel(x, kimbra) -> Dishevel(tiphani, marsh))\nCorrect(kimbra, tiphani) and Front(kimbra, tiphani) -> Front(tiphani, marsh)\nFront(tiphani, kimbra) -> Front(kimbra, tiphani)\nforall x (Correct(x, kimbra) and Front(x, marsh) -> Front(marsh, tiphani))\nforall x (Liquid(x) -> Front(x, kimbra))\nforall x (Dishevel(x, tiphani) -> Correct(x, marsh))\nforall x (Front(x, marsh) and Dishevel(x, marsh) -> Dishevel(x, tiphani))\n\nFront(kimbra, tiphani)\n\nFront(tiphani, kimbra) -> Front(kimbra, tiphani) <- forall x (Liquid(x) -> Front(x, kimbra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The ertha deterge the wendall. The ertha is pastelike. The ertha sequester the leone. The leone is neglectful. The leone shelter the wendall. The leone sequester the ertha. The wendall sequester the leone. If something is neglectful then it deterge the wendall. If something sequester the leone and it shelter the ertha then the leone shelter the wendall. If the ertha sequester the leone and the ertha deterge the leone then the leone deterge the wendall. If the leone deterge the ertha then the ertha deterge the leone. If something sequester the ertha and it deterge the wendall then the wendall deterge the leone. If something is zapotec then it deterge the ertha. If something shelter the leone then it sequester the wendall. If something deterge the wendall and it shelter the wendall then it shelter the leone. The ertha does not chase the ertha.", "logic": "\nDeterge(ertha, wendall)\nPastelike(ertha)\nSequester(ertha, leone)\nNeglectful(leone)\nShelter(leone, wendall)\nSequester(leone, ertha)\nSequester(wendall, leone)\nforall x (Neglectful(x) -> Deterge(x, wendall))\nforall x (Sequester(x, leone) and Shelter(x, ertha) -> Shelter(leone, wendall))\nSequester(ertha, leone) and Deterge(ertha, leone) -> Deterge(leone, wendall)\nDeterge(leone, ertha) -> Deterge(ertha, leone)\nforall x (Sequester(x, ertha) and Deterge(x, wendall) -> Deterge(wendall, leone))\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Deterge(x, ertha))\nforall x (Shelter(x, leone) -> Sequester(x, wendall))\nforall x (Deterge(x, wendall) and Shelter(x, wendall) -> Shelter(x, leone))\n\nnot Deterge(ertha, ertha)\n\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Deterge(x, ertha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The meredithe whicker the lisetta. The meredithe is cxlv. The meredithe oxygenate the meagan. The meagan is staid. The meagan ascertain the lisetta. The meagan oxygenate the meredithe. The lisetta oxygenate the meagan. If something is staid then it whicker the lisetta. If something oxygenate the meagan and it ascertain the meredithe then the meagan ascertain the lisetta. If the meredithe oxygenate the meagan and the meredithe whicker the meagan then the meagan whicker the lisetta. If the meagan whicker the meredithe then the meredithe whicker the meagan. If something oxygenate the meredithe and it whicker the lisetta then the lisetta whicker the meagan. If something is gordian then it whicker the meredithe. If something ascertain the meagan then it oxygenate the lisetta. If something whicker the lisetta and it ascertain the lisetta then it ascertain the meagan. The meredithe oxygenate the lisetta.", "logic": "\nWhicker(meredithe, lisetta)\nCxlv(meredithe)\nOxygenate(meredithe, meagan)\nStaid(meagan)\nAscertain(meagan, lisetta)\nOxygenate(meagan, meredithe)\nOxygenate(lisetta, meagan)\nforall x (Staid(x) -> Whicker(x, lisetta))\nforall x (Oxygenate(x, meagan) and Ascertain(x, meredithe) -> Ascertain(meagan, lisetta))\nOxygenate(meredithe, meagan) and Whicker(meredithe, meagan) -> Whicker(meagan, lisetta)\nWhicker(meagan, meredithe) -> Whicker(meredithe, meagan)\nforall x (Oxygenate(x, meredithe) and Whicker(x, lisetta) -> Whicker(lisetta, meagan))\nforall x (Gordian(x) -> Whicker(x, meredithe))\nforall x (Ascertain(x, meagan) -> Oxygenate(x, lisetta))\nforall x (Whicker(x, lisetta) and Ascertain(x, lisetta) -> Ascertain(x, meagan))\n\nOxygenate(meredithe, lisetta)\n\nforall x (Ascertain(x, meagan) -> Oxygenate(x, lisetta)) <- forall x (Whicker(x, lisetta) and Ascertain(x, lisetta) -> Ascertain(x, meagan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The kassia vocalise the rheba. The kassia is faulty. The kassia insist the ruthanne. The ruthanne is heard. The ruthanne dogmatize the rheba. The ruthanne insist the kassia. The rheba insist the ruthanne. If something is heard then it vocalise the rheba. If something insist the ruthanne and it dogmatize the kassia then the ruthanne dogmatize the rheba. If the kassia insist the ruthanne and the kassia vocalise the ruthanne then the ruthanne vocalise the rheba. If the ruthanne vocalise the kassia then the kassia vocalise the ruthanne. If something insist the kassia and it vocalise the rheba then the rheba vocalise the ruthanne. If something is bolivian then it vocalise the kassia. If something dogmatize the ruthanne then it insist the rheba. If something vocalise the rheba and it dogmatize the rheba then it dogmatize the ruthanne. The ruthanne is not bolivian.", "logic": "\nVocalise(kassia, rheba)\nFaulty(kassia)\nInsist(kassia, ruthanne)\nHeard(ruthanne)\nDogmatize(ruthanne, rheba)\nInsist(ruthanne, kassia)\nInsist(rheba, ruthanne)\nforall x (Heard(x) -> Vocalise(x, rheba))\nforall x (Insist(x, ruthanne) and Dogmatize(x, kassia) -> Dogmatize(ruthanne, rheba))\nInsist(kassia, ruthanne) and Vocalise(kassia, ruthanne) -> Vocalise(ruthanne, rheba)\nVocalise(ruthanne, kassia) -> Vocalise(kassia, ruthanne)\nforall x (Insist(x, kassia) and Vocalise(x, rheba) -> Vocalise(rheba, ruthanne))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> Vocalise(x, kassia))\nforall x (Dogmatize(x, ruthanne) -> Insist(x, rheba))\nforall x (Vocalise(x, rheba) and Dogmatize(x, rheba) -> Dogmatize(x, ruthanne))\n\nnot Bolivian(ruthanne)\n\nnot Bolivian(ruthanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The herman constrain the linus. The herman is hanoverian. The herman wrack the corrinne. The corrinne is identified. The corrinne capitulate the linus. The corrinne wrack the herman. The linus wrack the corrinne. If something is identified then it constrain the linus. If something wrack the corrinne and it capitulate the herman then the corrinne capitulate the linus. If the herman wrack the corrinne and the herman constrain the corrinne then the corrinne constrain the linus. If the corrinne constrain the herman then the herman constrain the corrinne. If something wrack the herman and it constrain the linus then the linus constrain the corrinne. If something is yogic then it constrain the herman. If something capitulate the corrinne then it wrack the linus. If something constrain the linus and it capitulate the linus then it capitulate the corrinne. The corrinne is hanoverian.", "logic": "\nConstrain(herman, linus)\nHanoverian(herman)\nWrack(herman, corrinne)\nIdentified(corrinne)\nCapitulate(corrinne, linus)\nWrack(corrinne, herman)\nWrack(linus, corrinne)\nforall x (Identified(x) -> Constrain(x, linus))\nforall x (Wrack(x, corrinne) and Capitulate(x, herman) -> Capitulate(corrinne, linus))\nWrack(herman, corrinne) and Constrain(herman, corrinne) -> Constrain(corrinne, linus)\nConstrain(corrinne, herman) -> Constrain(herman, corrinne)\nforall x (Wrack(x, herman) and Constrain(x, linus) -> Constrain(linus, corrinne))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Constrain(x, herman))\nforall x (Capitulate(x, corrinne) -> Wrack(x, linus))\nforall x (Constrain(x, linus) and Capitulate(x, linus) -> Capitulate(x, corrinne))\n\nHanoverian(corrinne)\n\nHanoverian(corrinne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The franklyn scribble the brana. The franklyn is outrigged. The franklyn ward the thedric. The thedric is taillike. The thedric rise the brana. The thedric ward the franklyn. The brana ward the thedric. If something is taillike then it scribble the brana. If something ward the thedric and it rise the franklyn then the thedric rise the brana. If the franklyn ward the thedric and the franklyn scribble the thedric then the thedric scribble the brana. If the thedric scribble the franklyn then the franklyn scribble the thedric. If something ward the franklyn and it scribble the brana then the brana scribble the thedric. If something is frightful then it scribble the franklyn. If something rise the thedric then it ward the brana. If something scribble the brana and it rise the brana then it rise the thedric. The thedric is not young.", "logic": "\nScribble(franklyn, brana)\nOutrigged(franklyn)\nWard(franklyn, thedric)\nTaillike(thedric)\nRise(thedric, brana)\nWard(thedric, franklyn)\nWard(brana, thedric)\nforall x (Taillike(x) -> Scribble(x, brana))\nforall x (Ward(x, thedric) and Rise(x, franklyn) -> Rise(thedric, brana))\nWard(franklyn, thedric) and Scribble(franklyn, thedric) -> Scribble(thedric, brana)\nScribble(thedric, franklyn) -> Scribble(franklyn, thedric)\nforall x (Ward(x, franklyn) and Scribble(x, brana) -> Scribble(brana, thedric))\nforall x (Frightful(x) -> Scribble(x, franklyn))\nforall x (Rise(x, thedric) -> Ward(x, brana))\nforall x (Scribble(x, brana) and Rise(x, brana) -> Rise(x, thedric))\n\nnot Young(thedric)\n\nnot Young(thedric) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The myrta swan the thorpe. The myrta is unmerciful. The myrta hallow the joslyn. The joslyn is retractile. The joslyn fructify the thorpe. The joslyn hallow the myrta. The thorpe hallow the joslyn. If something is retractile then it swan the thorpe. If something hallow the joslyn and it fructify the myrta then the joslyn fructify the thorpe. If the myrta hallow the joslyn and the myrta swan the joslyn then the joslyn swan the thorpe. If the joslyn swan the myrta then the myrta swan the joslyn. If something hallow the myrta and it swan the thorpe then the thorpe swan the joslyn. If something is ceylonese then it swan the myrta. If something fructify the joslyn then it hallow the thorpe. If something swan the thorpe and it fructify the thorpe then it fructify the joslyn. The thorpe is retractile.", "logic": "\nSwan(myrta, thorpe)\nUnmerciful(myrta)\nHallow(myrta, joslyn)\nRetractile(joslyn)\nFructify(joslyn, thorpe)\nHallow(joslyn, myrta)\nHallow(thorpe, joslyn)\nforall x (Retractile(x) -> Swan(x, thorpe))\nforall x (Hallow(x, joslyn) and Fructify(x, myrta) -> Fructify(joslyn, thorpe))\nHallow(myrta, joslyn) and Swan(myrta, joslyn) -> Swan(joslyn, thorpe)\nSwan(joslyn, myrta) -> Swan(myrta, joslyn)\nforall x (Hallow(x, myrta) and Swan(x, thorpe) -> Swan(thorpe, joslyn))\nforall x (Ceylonese(x) -> Swan(x, myrta))\nforall x (Fructify(x, joslyn) -> Hallow(x, thorpe))\nforall x (Swan(x, thorpe) and Fructify(x, thorpe) -> Fructify(x, joslyn))\n\nRetractile(thorpe)\n\nRetractile(thorpe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Charley is oaten. Charley is unpunctual. Charley is hermitic. Charley is unparallel. Noble is appositive. Noble is unparallel. Dyane is caesural. Dyane is mosstone. Dyane is oaten. Dyane is appositive. Dyane is unpunctual. Dyane is unparallel. Nice, oaten things are mosstone. If Noble is unparallel and Noble is caesural then Noble is hermitic. Rough, appositive things are oaten. All unparallel things are unpunctual. Young things are caesural. If something is caesural and unpunctual then it is mosstone. Noble is appositive.", "logic": "\nOaten(charley)\nUnpunctual(charley)\nHermitic(charley)\nUnparallel(charley)\nAppositive(noble)\nUnparallel(noble)\nCaesural(dyane)\nMosstone(dyane)\nOaten(dyane)\nAppositive(dyane)\nUnpunctual(dyane)\nUnparallel(dyane)\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Oaten(x) -> Mosstone(x))\nUnparallel(noble) and Caesural(noble) -> Hermitic(noble)\nforall x (Hermitic(x) and Appositive(x) -> Oaten(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Unpunctual(x))\nforall x (Unparallel(x) -> Caesural(x))\nforall x (Caesural(x) and Unpunctual(x) -> Mosstone(x))\n\nAppositive(noble)\n\ntherefore Appositive(noble)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Vonny is unicameral. Vonny is insatiable. Vonny is clubfooted. Vonny is unwed. Victor is hoary. Victor is unwed. Isabel is gustative. Isabel is mutative. Isabel is unicameral. Isabel is hoary. Isabel is insatiable. Isabel is unwed. Nice, unicameral things are mutative. If Victor is unwed and Victor is gustative then Victor is clubfooted. Rough, hoary things are unicameral. All unwed things are insatiable. Young things are gustative. If something is gustative and insatiable then it is mutative. Victor is not hoary.", "logic": "\nUnicameral(vonny)\nInsatiable(vonny)\nClubfooted(vonny)\nUnwed(vonny)\nHoary(victor)\nUnwed(victor)\nGustative(isabel)\nMutative(isabel)\nUnicameral(isabel)\nHoary(isabel)\nInsatiable(isabel)\nUnwed(isabel)\nforall x (Hoary(x) and Unicameral(x) -> Mutative(x))\nUnwed(victor) and Gustative(victor) -> Clubfooted(victor)\nforall x (Clubfooted(x) and Hoary(x) -> Unicameral(x))\nforall x (Unwed(x) -> Insatiable(x))\nforall x (Unwed(x) -> Gustative(x))\nforall x (Gustative(x) and Insatiable(x) -> Mutative(x))\n\nnot Hoary(victor)\n\ntherefore Hoary(victor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Tamra is darwinian. Tamra is furlike. Tamra is explicable. Tamra is eukaryotic. Elysia is expandable. Elysia is eukaryotic. Sari is slanderous. Sari is unseen. Sari is darwinian. Sari is expandable. Sari is furlike. Sari is eukaryotic. Nice, darwinian things are unseen. If Elysia is eukaryotic and Elysia is slanderous then Elysia is explicable. Rough, expandable things are darwinian. All eukaryotic things are furlike. Young things are slanderous. If something is slanderous and furlike then it is unseen. Tamra is slanderous.", "logic": "\nDarwinian(tamra)\nFurlike(tamra)\nExplicable(tamra)\nEukaryotic(tamra)\nExpandable(elysia)\nEukaryotic(elysia)\nSlanderous(sari)\nUnseen(sari)\nDarwinian(sari)\nExpandable(sari)\nFurlike(sari)\nEukaryotic(sari)\nforall x (Expandable(x) and Darwinian(x) -> Unseen(x))\nEukaryotic(elysia) and Slanderous(elysia) -> Explicable(elysia)\nforall x (Explicable(x) and Expandable(x) -> Darwinian(x))\nforall x (Eukaryotic(x) -> Furlike(x))\nforall x (Eukaryotic(x) -> Slanderous(x))\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Furlike(x) -> Unseen(x))\n\nSlanderous(tamra)\n\nEukaryotic(tamra) and forall x (Eukaryotic(x) -> Slanderous(x)) -> therefore Slanderous(tamra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Woodie is unlikeable. Woodie is lxxx. Woodie is baking. Woodie is aseptic. Philippa is loath. Philippa is aseptic. Douglas is raptorial. Douglas is nine. Douglas is unlikeable. Douglas is loath. Douglas is lxxx. Douglas is aseptic. Nice, unlikeable things are nine. If Philippa is aseptic and Philippa is raptorial then Philippa is baking. Rough, loath things are unlikeable. All aseptic things are lxxx. Young things are raptorial. If something is raptorial and lxxx then it is nine. Philippa is not raptorial.", "logic": "\nUnlikeable(woodie)\nLxxx(woodie)\nBaking(woodie)\nAseptic(woodie)\nLoath(philippa)\nAseptic(philippa)\nRaptorial(douglas)\nNine(douglas)\nUnlikeable(douglas)\nLoath(douglas)\nLxxx(douglas)\nAseptic(douglas)\nforall x (Loath(x) and Unlikeable(x) -> Nine(x))\nAseptic(philippa) and Raptorial(philippa) -> Baking(philippa)\nforall x (Baking(x) and Loath(x) -> Unlikeable(x))\nforall x (Aseptic(x) -> Lxxx(x))\nforall x (Aseptic(x) -> Raptorial(x))\nforall x (Raptorial(x) and Lxxx(x) -> Nine(x))\n\nnot Raptorial(philippa)\n\nAseptic(philippa) and forall x (Aseptic(x) -> Raptorial(x)) -> therefore Raptorial(philippa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Alecia is herbaceous. Alecia is holozoic. Alecia is vivacious. Alecia is bisontine. Chase is vulval. Chase is bisontine. Ware is electoral. Ware is slavish. Ware is herbaceous. Ware is vulval. Ware is holozoic. Ware is bisontine. Nice, herbaceous things are slavish. If Chase is bisontine and Chase is electoral then Chase is vivacious. Rough, vulval things are herbaceous. All bisontine things are holozoic. Young things are electoral. If something is electoral and holozoic then it is slavish. Alecia is slavish.", "logic": "\nHerbaceous(alecia)\nHolozoic(alecia)\nVivacious(alecia)\nBisontine(alecia)\nVulval(chase)\nBisontine(chase)\nElectoral(ware)\nSlavish(ware)\nHerbaceous(ware)\nVulval(ware)\nHolozoic(ware)\nBisontine(ware)\nforall x (Vulval(x) and Herbaceous(x) -> Slavish(x))\nBisontine(chase) and Electoral(chase) -> Vivacious(chase)\nforall x (Vivacious(x) and Vulval(x) -> Herbaceous(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Holozoic(x))\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Electoral(x))\nforall x (Electoral(x) and Holozoic(x) -> Slavish(x))\n\nSlavish(alecia)\n\nBisontine(alecia) and forall x (Bisontine(x) -> Electoral(x)) -> therefore Electoral(alecia) Electoral(alecia) and Holozoic(alecia) and forall x (Electoral(x) and Holozoic(x) -> Slavish(x)) -> therefore Slavish(alecia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Brena is syntactic. Brena is raiseable. Brena is anecdotic. Brena is european. Dorothy is untried. Dorothy is european. Bobina is odourless. Bobina is crackers. Bobina is syntactic. Bobina is untried. Bobina is raiseable. Bobina is european. Nice, syntactic things are crackers. If Dorothy is european and Dorothy is odourless then Dorothy is anecdotic. Rough, untried things are syntactic. All european things are raiseable. Young things are odourless. If something is odourless and raiseable then it is crackers. Brena is not crackers.", "logic": "\nSyntactic(brena)\nRaiseable(brena)\nAnecdotic(brena)\nEuropean(brena)\nUntried(dorothy)\nEuropean(dorothy)\nOdourless(bobina)\nCrackers(bobina)\nSyntactic(bobina)\nUntried(bobina)\nRaiseable(bobina)\nEuropean(bobina)\nforall x (Untried(x) and Syntactic(x) -> Crackers(x))\nEuropean(dorothy) and Odourless(dorothy) -> Anecdotic(dorothy)\nforall x (Anecdotic(x) and Untried(x) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (European(x) -> Raiseable(x))\nforall x (European(x) -> Odourless(x))\nforall x (Odourless(x) and Raiseable(x) -> Crackers(x))\n\nnot Crackers(brena)\n\nEuropean(brena) and forall x (European(x) -> Odourless(x)) -> therefore Odourless(brena) Odourless(brena) and Raiseable(brena) and forall x (Odourless(x) and Raiseable(x) -> Crackers(x)) -> therefore Crackers(brena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Keenan is studied. Keenan is settled. Keenan is laid. Keenan is slanderous. Corry is iodised. Corry is slanderous. Corissa is coexistent. Corissa is clangorous. Corissa is studied. Corissa is iodised. Corissa is settled. Corissa is slanderous. Nice, studied things are clangorous. If Corry is slanderous and Corry is coexistent then Corry is laid. Rough, iodised things are studied. All slanderous things are settled. Young things are coexistent. If something is coexistent and settled then it is clangorous. Corry is studied.", "logic": "\nStudied(keenan)\nSettled(keenan)\nLaid(keenan)\nSlanderous(keenan)\nIodised(corry)\nSlanderous(corry)\nCoexistent(corissa)\nClangorous(corissa)\nStudied(corissa)\nIodised(corissa)\nSettled(corissa)\nSlanderous(corissa)\nforall x (Iodised(x) and Studied(x) -> Clangorous(x))\nSlanderous(corry) and Coexistent(corry) -> Laid(corry)\nforall x (Laid(x) and Iodised(x) -> Studied(x))\nforall x (Slanderous(x) -> Settled(x))\nforall x (Slanderous(x) -> Coexistent(x))\nforall x (Coexistent(x) and Settled(x) -> Clangorous(x))\n\nStudied(corry)\n\nSlanderous(corry) and forall x (Slanderous(x) -> Coexistent(x)) -> therefore Coexistent(corry) Slanderous(corry) and Coexistent(corry) and Slanderous(corry) and Coexistent(corry) -> Laid(corry) -> therefore Laid(corry) Laid(corry) and Iodised(corry) and forall x (Laid(x) and Iodised(x) -> Studied(x)) -> therefore Studied(corry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Maribelle is altruistic. Maribelle is repand. Maribelle is wizen. Maribelle is thyroid. Hubert is upstair. Hubert is thyroid. Cecilia is xenophobic. Cecilia is hardbound. Cecilia is altruistic. Cecilia is upstair. Cecilia is repand. Cecilia is thyroid. Nice, altruistic things are hardbound. If Hubert is thyroid and Hubert is xenophobic then Hubert is wizen. Rough, upstair things are altruistic. All thyroid things are repand. Young things are xenophobic. If something is xenophobic and repand then it is hardbound. Hubert is not altruistic.", "logic": "\nAltruistic(maribelle)\nRepand(maribelle)\nWizen(maribelle)\nThyroid(maribelle)\nUpstair(hubert)\nThyroid(hubert)\nXenophobic(cecilia)\nHardbound(cecilia)\nAltruistic(cecilia)\nUpstair(cecilia)\nRepand(cecilia)\nThyroid(cecilia)\nforall x (Upstair(x) and Altruistic(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nThyroid(hubert) and Xenophobic(hubert) -> Wizen(hubert)\nforall x (Wizen(x) and Upstair(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Repand(x))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) -> Xenophobic(x))\nforall x (Xenophobic(x) and Repand(x) -> Hardbound(x))\n\nnot Altruistic(hubert)\n\nThyroid(hubert) and forall x (Thyroid(x) -> Xenophobic(x)) -> therefore Xenophobic(hubert) Thyroid(hubert) and Xenophobic(hubert) and Thyroid(hubert) and Xenophobic(hubert) -> Wizen(hubert) -> therefore Wizen(hubert) Wizen(hubert) and Upstair(hubert) and forall x (Wizen(x) and Upstair(x) -> Altruistic(x)) -> therefore Altruistic(hubert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Hassan is yogic. Hassan is concluding. Hassan is appositive. Hassan is hypnogogic. Krishna is slipshod. Krishna is hypnogogic. Curt is apractic. Curt is nosohusial. Curt is yogic. Curt is slipshod. Curt is concluding. Curt is hypnogogic. Nice, yogic things are nosohusial. If Krishna is hypnogogic and Krishna is apractic then Krishna is appositive. Rough, slipshod things are yogic. All hypnogogic things are concluding. Young things are apractic. If something is apractic and concluding then it is nosohusial. Curt is not appositive.", "logic": "\nYogic(hassan)\nConcluding(hassan)\nAppositive(hassan)\nHypnogogic(hassan)\nSlipshod(krishna)\nHypnogogic(krishna)\nApractic(curt)\nNosohusial(curt)\nYogic(curt)\nSlipshod(curt)\nConcluding(curt)\nHypnogogic(curt)\nforall x (Slipshod(x) and Yogic(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\nHypnogogic(krishna) and Apractic(krishna) -> Appositive(krishna)\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Slipshod(x) -> Yogic(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Concluding(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Apractic(x))\nforall x (Apractic(x) and Concluding(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\n\nnot Appositive(curt)\n\nnot Appositive(curt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Marja is moist. Marja is nubile. Marja is encircled. Marja is spirant. Merv is canonical. Merv is spirant. Binnie is thermionic. Binnie is bacterioid. Binnie is moist. Binnie is canonical. Binnie is nubile. Binnie is spirant. Nice, moist things are bacterioid. If Merv is spirant and Merv is thermionic then Merv is encircled. Rough, canonical things are moist. All spirant things are nubile. Young things are thermionic. If something is thermionic and nubile then it is bacterioid. Marja is canonical.", "logic": "\nMoist(marja)\nNubile(marja)\nEncircled(marja)\nSpirant(marja)\nCanonical(merv)\nSpirant(merv)\nThermionic(binnie)\nBacterioid(binnie)\nMoist(binnie)\nCanonical(binnie)\nNubile(binnie)\nSpirant(binnie)\nforall x (Canonical(x) and Moist(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\nSpirant(merv) and Thermionic(merv) -> Encircled(merv)\nforall x (Encircled(x) and Canonical(x) -> Moist(x))\nforall x (Spirant(x) -> Nubile(x))\nforall x (Spirant(x) -> Thermionic(x))\nforall x (Thermionic(x) and Nubile(x) -> Bacterioid(x))\n\nCanonical(marja)\n\nCanonical(marja) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1059"} {"premises": "Joaquin is mediated. Adolpho is downmarket. Cybelle is similar. Thomasine is eatable. Cold things are sorry. Cybelle is similar.", "logic": "\nMediated(joaquin)\nDownmarket(adolpho)\nSimilar(cybelle)\nEatable(thomasine)\nforall x (Downmarket(x) -> Sorry(x))\n\nSimilar(cybelle)\n\ntherefore Similar(cybelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Devi is tahitian. Delcine is dandy. Sybille is stigmatic. Gertruda is spendable. Cold things are writhed. Gertruda is not spendable.", "logic": "\nTahitian(devi)\nDandy(delcine)\nStigmatic(sybille)\nSpendable(gertruda)\nforall x (Dandy(x) -> Writhed(x))\n\nnot Spendable(gertruda)\n\ntherefore Spendable(gertruda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Mabelle is unshaken. Cornie is bedded. Corri is serrate. Elroy is undulant. Cold things are unselfish. Cornie is unselfish.", "logic": "\nUnshaken(mabelle)\nBedded(cornie)\nSerrate(corri)\nUndulant(elroy)\nforall x (Bedded(x) -> Unselfish(x))\n\nUnselfish(cornie)\n\nBedded(cornie) and forall x (Bedded(x) -> Unselfish(x)) -> therefore Unselfish(cornie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Cletus is hypodermic. Alameda is botanical. Nerissa is condylar. Chaunce is ruthless. Cold things are thwartwise. Alameda is not thwartwise.", "logic": "\nHypodermic(cletus)\nBotanical(alameda)\nCondylar(nerissa)\nRuthless(chaunce)\nforall x (Botanical(x) -> Thwartwise(x))\n\nnot Thwartwise(alameda)\n\nBotanical(alameda) and forall x (Botanical(x) -> Thwartwise(x)) -> therefore Thwartwise(alameda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Brewster is asternal. Torey is expiratory. Iago is plundering. Madella is yokelish. Cold things are lukewarm. Brewster is not lukewarm.", "logic": "\nAsternal(brewster)\nExpiratory(torey)\nPlundering(iago)\nYokelish(madella)\nforall x (Expiratory(x) -> Lukewarm(x))\n\nnot Lukewarm(brewster)\n\nforall x (Expiratory(x) -> Lukewarm(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Roxi is drawn. Lindsay is blusterous. Drake is rumansh. Jacinta is extrinsic. Cold things are spongelike. Jacinta is spongelike.", "logic": "\nDrawn(roxi)\nBlusterous(lindsay)\nRumansh(drake)\nExtrinsic(jacinta)\nforall x (Blusterous(x) -> Spongelike(x))\n\nSpongelike(jacinta)\n\nforall x (Blusterous(x) -> Spongelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Rosetta is pretorial. Zollie is sneezy. Colin is gradable. Cleo is curled. Cold things are gelded. Zollie is not quiet.", "logic": "\nPretorial(rosetta)\nSneezy(zollie)\nGradable(colin)\nCurled(cleo)\nforall x (Sneezy(x) -> Gelded(x))\n\nnot Quiet(zollie)\n\nnot Quiet(zollie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Maynord is bedaubed. Bryan is drizzling. Martita is bathetic. Janenna is stratified. Cold things are royal. Maynord is nice.", "logic": "\nBedaubed(maynord)\nDrizzling(bryan)\nBathetic(martita)\nStratified(janenna)\nforall x (Drizzling(x) -> Royal(x))\n\nNice(maynord)\n\nNice(maynord) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3159"} {"premises": "Milly is niffy. Milly is unvaried. Jeanne is baleful. Jeanne is botonee. Jeanne is unvaried. Jeanne is educated. Rhianna is educated. Kaiser is baleful. Kaiser is columned. Kaiser is niffy. Kaiser is unvaried. Kaiser is taciturn. If Kaiser is unvaried and Kaiser is columned then Kaiser is baleful. All unvaried, niffy people are botonee. Jeanne is educated.", "logic": "\nNiffy(milly)\nUnvaried(milly)\nBaleful(jeanne)\nBotonee(jeanne)\nUnvaried(jeanne)\nEducated(jeanne)\nEducated(rhianna)\nBaleful(kaiser)\nColumned(kaiser)\nNiffy(kaiser)\nUnvaried(kaiser)\nTaciturn(kaiser)\nUnvaried(kaiser) and Columned(kaiser) -> Baleful(kaiser)\nforall x (Unvaried(x) and Niffy(x) -> Botonee(x))\n\nEducated(jeanne)\n\ntherefore Educated(jeanne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2357"} {"premises": "Howard is glomerular. Howard is pedestrian. Lennie is stroppy. Lennie is mirrored. Lennie is pedestrian. Lennie is unratable. Noami is unratable. Dorita is stroppy. Dorita is hatless. Dorita is glomerular. Dorita is pedestrian. Dorita is bottommost. If Dorita is pedestrian and Dorita is hatless then Dorita is stroppy. All pedestrian, glomerular people are mirrored. Noami is not unratable.", "logic": "\nGlomerular(howard)\nPedestrian(howard)\nStroppy(lennie)\nMirrored(lennie)\nPedestrian(lennie)\nUnratable(lennie)\nUnratable(noami)\nStroppy(dorita)\nHatless(dorita)\nGlomerular(dorita)\nPedestrian(dorita)\nBottommost(dorita)\nPedestrian(dorita) and Hatless(dorita) -> Stroppy(dorita)\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) and Glomerular(x) -> Mirrored(x))\n\nnot Unratable(noami)\n\ntherefore Unratable(noami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2357"} {"premises": "Byram is feculent. Byram is lovelorn. Gertrude is araneidal. Gertrude is phantasmal. Gertrude is lovelorn. Gertrude is downhill. Renard is downhill. Imogene is araneidal. Imogene is primal. Imogene is feculent. Imogene is lovelorn. Imogene is injurious. If Imogene is lovelorn and Imogene is primal then Imogene is araneidal. All lovelorn, feculent people are phantasmal. Renard is not phantasmal.", "logic": "\nFeculent(byram)\nLovelorn(byram)\nAraneidal(gertrude)\nPhantasmal(gertrude)\nLovelorn(gertrude)\nDownhill(gertrude)\nDownhill(renard)\nAraneidal(imogene)\nPrimal(imogene)\nFeculent(imogene)\nLovelorn(imogene)\nInjurious(imogene)\nLovelorn(imogene) and Primal(imogene) -> Araneidal(imogene)\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Feculent(x) -> Phantasmal(x))\n\nnot Phantasmal(renard)\n\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Feculent(x) -> Phantasmal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2357"} {"premises": "Lawrence is clubbable. Lawrence is dissonant. Gertie is collective. Gertie is papistical. Gertie is dissonant. Gertie is unhuman. Isidora is unhuman. Charlton is collective. Charlton is caucasoid. Charlton is clubbable. Charlton is dissonant. Charlton is castled. If Charlton is dissonant and Charlton is caucasoid then Charlton is collective. All dissonant, clubbable people are papistical. Gertie is clubbable.", "logic": "\nClubbable(lawrence)\nDissonant(lawrence)\nCollective(gertie)\nPapistical(gertie)\nDissonant(gertie)\nUnhuman(gertie)\nUnhuman(isidora)\nCollective(charlton)\nCaucasoid(charlton)\nClubbable(charlton)\nDissonant(charlton)\nCastled(charlton)\nDissonant(charlton) and Caucasoid(charlton) -> Collective(charlton)\nforall x (Dissonant(x) and Clubbable(x) -> Papistical(x))\n\nClubbable(gertie)\n\nClubbable(gertie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2357"} {"premises": "The cortney classify the myrta. The myrta is agonal. The kippie brutalize the walter. The walter classify the myrta. If someone caramelize the kippie then the kippie is agonal. If someone classify the kippie and they eat the walter then the kippie caramelize the myrta. If someone is agonal then they eat the kippie. If someone classify the walter then the walter brutalize the cortney. If someone classify the cortney then the cortney classify the kippie. If someone classify the cortney then they see the cortney. The walter classify the myrta.", "logic": "\nClassify(cortney, myrta)\nAgonal(myrta)\nBrutalize(kippie, walter)\nClassify(walter, myrta)\nforall x (Caramelize(x, kippie) -> Agonal(kippie))\nforall x (Classify(x, kippie) and Caramelize(x, walter) -> Caramelize(kippie, myrta))\nforall x (Agonal(x) -> Caramelize(x, kippie))\nforall x (Classify(x, walter) -> Brutalize(walter, cortney))\nforall x (Classify(x, cortney) -> Classify(cortney, kippie))\nforall x (Classify(x, cortney) -> Brutalize(x, cortney))\n\nClassify(walter, myrta)\n\ntherefore Classify(walter, myrta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The allis wince the marcelia. The marcelia is cumuliform. The prunella testify the floyd. The floyd wince the marcelia. If someone dissociate the prunella then the prunella is cumuliform. If someone wince the prunella and they eat the floyd then the prunella dissociate the marcelia. If someone is cumuliform then they eat the prunella. If someone wince the floyd then the floyd testify the allis. If someone wince the allis then the allis wince the prunella. If someone wince the allis then they see the allis. The marcelia is not cumuliform.", "logic": "\nWince(allis, marcelia)\nCumuliform(marcelia)\nTestify(prunella, floyd)\nWince(floyd, marcelia)\nforall x (Dissociate(x, prunella) -> Cumuliform(prunella))\nforall x (Wince(x, prunella) and Dissociate(x, floyd) -> Dissociate(prunella, marcelia))\nforall x (Cumuliform(x) -> Dissociate(x, prunella))\nforall x (Wince(x, floyd) -> Testify(floyd, allis))\nforall x (Wince(x, allis) -> Wince(allis, prunella))\nforall x (Wince(x, allis) -> Testify(x, allis))\n\nnot Cumuliform(marcelia)\n\ntherefore Cumuliform(marcelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The gratia transplant the farra. The farra is allied. The annamari garrotte the conroy. The conroy transplant the farra. If someone reload the annamari then the annamari is allied. If someone transplant the annamari and they eat the conroy then the annamari reload the farra. If someone is allied then they eat the annamari. If someone transplant the conroy then the conroy garrotte the gratia. If someone transplant the gratia then the gratia transplant the annamari. If someone transplant the gratia then they see the gratia. The farra reload the annamari.", "logic": "\nTransplant(gratia, farra)\nAllied(farra)\nGarrotte(annamari, conroy)\nTransplant(conroy, farra)\nforall x (Reload(x, annamari) -> Allied(annamari))\nforall x (Transplant(x, annamari) and Reload(x, conroy) -> Reload(annamari, farra))\nforall x (Allied(x) -> Reload(x, annamari))\nforall x (Transplant(x, conroy) -> Garrotte(conroy, gratia))\nforall x (Transplant(x, gratia) -> Transplant(gratia, annamari))\nforall x (Transplant(x, gratia) -> Garrotte(x, gratia))\n\nReload(farra, annamari)\n\nAllied(farra) and forall x (Allied(x) -> Reload(x, annamari)) -> therefore Reload(farra, annamari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The arlo unbosom the eric. The eric is leglike. The tonya cruise the fina. The fina unbosom the eric. If someone instill the tonya then the tonya is leglike. If someone unbosom the tonya and they eat the fina then the tonya instill the eric. If someone is leglike then they eat the tonya. If someone unbosom the fina then the fina cruise the arlo. If someone unbosom the arlo then the arlo unbosom the tonya. If someone unbosom the arlo then they see the arlo. The eric does not eat the tonya.", "logic": "\nUnbosom(arlo, eric)\nLeglike(eric)\nCruise(tonya, fina)\nUnbosom(fina, eric)\nforall x (Instill(x, tonya) -> Leglike(tonya))\nforall x (Unbosom(x, tonya) and Instill(x, fina) -> Instill(tonya, eric))\nforall x (Leglike(x) -> Instill(x, tonya))\nforall x (Unbosom(x, fina) -> Cruise(fina, arlo))\nforall x (Unbosom(x, arlo) -> Unbosom(arlo, tonya))\nforall x (Unbosom(x, arlo) -> Cruise(x, arlo))\n\nnot Instill(eric, tonya)\n\nLeglike(eric) and forall x (Leglike(x) -> Instill(x, tonya)) -> therefore Instill(eric, tonya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The gaynor discourse the truman. The truman is protrusile. The crawford parcel the elita. The elita discourse the truman. If someone deplete the crawford then the crawford is protrusile. If someone discourse the crawford and they eat the elita then the crawford deplete the truman. If someone is protrusile then they eat the crawford. If someone discourse the elita then the elita parcel the gaynor. If someone discourse the gaynor then the gaynor discourse the crawford. If someone discourse the gaynor then they see the gaynor. The crawford is protrusile.", "logic": "\nDiscourse(gaynor, truman)\nProtrusile(truman)\nParcel(crawford, elita)\nDiscourse(elita, truman)\nforall x (Deplete(x, crawford) -> Protrusile(crawford))\nforall x (Discourse(x, crawford) and Deplete(x, elita) -> Deplete(crawford, truman))\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Deplete(x, crawford))\nforall x (Discourse(x, elita) -> Parcel(elita, gaynor))\nforall x (Discourse(x, gaynor) -> Discourse(gaynor, crawford))\nforall x (Discourse(x, gaynor) -> Parcel(x, gaynor))\n\nProtrusile(crawford)\n\nProtrusile(truman) and forall x (Protrusile(x) -> Deplete(x, crawford)) -> therefore Deplete(truman, crawford) Deplete(truman, crawford) and forall x (Deplete(x, crawford) -> Protrusile(crawford)) -> therefore Protrusile(crawford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The chevalier comb the miles. The miles is felted. The wilfred yacht the marie. The marie comb the miles. If someone tread the wilfred then the wilfred is felted. If someone comb the wilfred and they eat the marie then the wilfred tread the miles. If someone is felted then they eat the wilfred. If someone comb the marie then the marie yacht the chevalier. If someone comb the chevalier then the chevalier comb the wilfred. If someone comb the chevalier then they see the chevalier. The wilfred is not felted.", "logic": "\nComb(chevalier, miles)\nFelted(miles)\nYacht(wilfred, marie)\nComb(marie, miles)\nforall x (Tread(x, wilfred) -> Felted(wilfred))\nforall x (Comb(x, wilfred) and Tread(x, marie) -> Tread(wilfred, miles))\nforall x (Felted(x) -> Tread(x, wilfred))\nforall x (Comb(x, marie) -> Yacht(marie, chevalier))\nforall x (Comb(x, chevalier) -> Comb(chevalier, wilfred))\nforall x (Comb(x, chevalier) -> Yacht(x, chevalier))\n\nnot Felted(wilfred)\n\nFelted(miles) and forall x (Felted(x) -> Tread(x, wilfred)) -> therefore Tread(miles, wilfred) Tread(miles, wilfred) and forall x (Tread(x, wilfred) -> Felted(wilfred)) -> therefore Felted(wilfred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The lilllie bobsled the mmarianne. The mmarianne is lightsome. The damaris repeal the hamlet. The hamlet bobsled the mmarianne. If someone lasso the damaris then the damaris is lightsome. If someone bobsled the damaris and they eat the hamlet then the damaris lasso the mmarianne. If someone is lightsome then they eat the damaris. If someone bobsled the hamlet then the hamlet repeal the lilllie. If someone bobsled the lilllie then the lilllie bobsled the damaris. If someone bobsled the lilllie then they see the lilllie. The damaris lasso the damaris.", "logic": "\nBobsled(lilllie, mmarianne)\nLightsome(mmarianne)\nRepeal(damaris, hamlet)\nBobsled(hamlet, mmarianne)\nforall x (Lasso(x, damaris) -> Lightsome(damaris))\nforall x (Bobsled(x, damaris) and Lasso(x, hamlet) -> Lasso(damaris, mmarianne))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) -> Lasso(x, damaris))\nforall x (Bobsled(x, hamlet) -> Repeal(hamlet, lilllie))\nforall x (Bobsled(x, lilllie) -> Bobsled(lilllie, damaris))\nforall x (Bobsled(x, lilllie) -> Repeal(x, lilllie))\n\nLasso(damaris, damaris)\n\nLightsome(mmarianne) and forall x (Lightsome(x) -> Lasso(x, damaris)) -> therefore Lasso(mmarianne, damaris) Lasso(mmarianne, damaris) and forall x (Lasso(x, damaris) -> Lightsome(damaris)) -> therefore Lightsome(damaris) Lightsome(damaris) and forall x (Lightsome(x) -> Lasso(x, damaris)) -> therefore Lasso(damaris, damaris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The sherwood hunt the vassily. The vassily is praetorial. The trever indict the gregorio. The gregorio hunt the vassily. If someone unpack the trever then the trever is praetorial. If someone hunt the trever and they eat the gregorio then the trever unpack the vassily. If someone is praetorial then they eat the trever. If someone hunt the gregorio then the gregorio indict the sherwood. If someone hunt the sherwood then the sherwood hunt the trever. If someone hunt the sherwood then they see the sherwood. The trever does not eat the trever.", "logic": "\nHunt(sherwood, vassily)\nPraetorial(vassily)\nIndict(trever, gregorio)\nHunt(gregorio, vassily)\nforall x (Unpack(x, trever) -> Praetorial(trever))\nforall x (Hunt(x, trever) and Unpack(x, gregorio) -> Unpack(trever, vassily))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) -> Unpack(x, trever))\nforall x (Hunt(x, gregorio) -> Indict(gregorio, sherwood))\nforall x (Hunt(x, sherwood) -> Hunt(sherwood, trever))\nforall x (Hunt(x, sherwood) -> Indict(x, sherwood))\n\nnot Unpack(trever, trever)\n\nPraetorial(vassily) and forall x (Praetorial(x) -> Unpack(x, trever)) -> therefore Unpack(vassily, trever) Unpack(vassily, trever) and forall x (Unpack(x, trever) -> Praetorial(trever)) -> therefore Praetorial(trever) Praetorial(trever) and forall x (Praetorial(x) -> Unpack(x, trever)) -> therefore Unpack(trever, trever)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The angus vaccinate the sheree. The sheree is clubable. The maxfield prompt the maxim. The maxim vaccinate the sheree. If someone parley the maxfield then the maxfield is clubable. If someone vaccinate the maxfield and they eat the maxim then the maxfield parley the sheree. If someone is clubable then they eat the maxfield. If someone vaccinate the maxim then the maxim prompt the angus. If someone vaccinate the angus then the angus vaccinate the maxfield. If someone vaccinate the angus then they see the angus. The maxim does not see the angus.", "logic": "\nVaccinate(angus, sheree)\nClubable(sheree)\nPrompt(maxfield, maxim)\nVaccinate(maxim, sheree)\nforall x (Parley(x, maxfield) -> Clubable(maxfield))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, maxfield) and Parley(x, maxim) -> Parley(maxfield, sheree))\nforall x (Clubable(x) -> Parley(x, maxfield))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, maxim) -> Prompt(maxim, angus))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, angus) -> Vaccinate(angus, maxfield))\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, angus) -> Prompt(x, angus))\n\nnot Prompt(maxim, angus)\n\nforall x (Vaccinate(x, maxim) -> Prompt(maxim, angus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The madona replenish the annmarie. The annmarie is unsung. The meghan attack the shaun. The shaun replenish the annmarie. If someone personate the meghan then the meghan is unsung. If someone replenish the meghan and they eat the shaun then the meghan personate the annmarie. If someone is unsung then they eat the meghan. If someone replenish the shaun then the shaun attack the madona. If someone replenish the madona then the madona replenish the meghan. If someone replenish the madona then they see the madona. The annmarie attack the madona.", "logic": "\nReplenish(madona, annmarie)\nUnsung(annmarie)\nAttack(meghan, shaun)\nReplenish(shaun, annmarie)\nforall x (Personate(x, meghan) -> Unsung(meghan))\nforall x (Replenish(x, meghan) and Personate(x, shaun) -> Personate(meghan, annmarie))\nforall x (Unsung(x) -> Personate(x, meghan))\nforall x (Replenish(x, shaun) -> Attack(shaun, madona))\nforall x (Replenish(x, madona) -> Replenish(madona, meghan))\nforall x (Replenish(x, madona) -> Attack(x, madona))\n\nAttack(annmarie, madona)\n\nforall x (Replenish(x, madona) -> Attack(x, madona)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The randy befriend the griswold. The griswold is compliant. The wait heal the amberly. The amberly befriend the griswold. If someone overcrop the wait then the wait is compliant. If someone befriend the wait and they eat the amberly then the wait overcrop the griswold. If someone is compliant then they eat the wait. If someone befriend the amberly then the amberly heal the randy. If someone befriend the randy then the randy befriend the wait. If someone befriend the randy then they see the randy. The randy does not need the wait.", "logic": "\nBefriend(randy, griswold)\nCompliant(griswold)\nHeal(wait, amberly)\nBefriend(amberly, griswold)\nforall x (Overcrop(x, wait) -> Compliant(wait))\nforall x (Befriend(x, wait) and Overcrop(x, amberly) -> Overcrop(wait, griswold))\nforall x (Compliant(x) -> Overcrop(x, wait))\nforall x (Befriend(x, amberly) -> Heal(amberly, randy))\nforall x (Befriend(x, randy) -> Befriend(randy, wait))\nforall x (Befriend(x, randy) -> Heal(x, randy))\n\nnot Befriend(randy, wait)\n\nforall x (Befriend(x, randy) -> Befriend(randy, wait)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The sheri vowelise the howard. The howard is stovepiped. The catlaina burp the coral. The coral vowelise the howard. If someone ruin the catlaina then the catlaina is stovepiped. If someone vowelise the catlaina and they eat the coral then the catlaina ruin the howard. If someone is stovepiped then they eat the catlaina. If someone vowelise the coral then the coral burp the sheri. If someone vowelise the sheri then the sheri vowelise the catlaina. If someone vowelise the sheri then they see the sheri. The sheri ruin the catlaina.", "logic": "\nVowelise(sheri, howard)\nStovepiped(howard)\nBurp(catlaina, coral)\nVowelise(coral, howard)\nforall x (Ruin(x, catlaina) -> Stovepiped(catlaina))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, catlaina) and Ruin(x, coral) -> Ruin(catlaina, howard))\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Ruin(x, catlaina))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, coral) -> Burp(coral, sheri))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, sheri) -> Vowelise(sheri, catlaina))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, sheri) -> Burp(x, sheri))\n\nRuin(sheri, catlaina)\n\nforall x (Stovepiped(x) -> Ruin(x, catlaina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The bethena opalize the marcos. The marcos is adulatory. The nettie tenant the karlee. The karlee opalize the marcos. If someone keratinize the nettie then the nettie is adulatory. If someone opalize the nettie and they eat the karlee then the nettie keratinize the marcos. If someone is adulatory then they eat the nettie. If someone opalize the karlee then the karlee tenant the bethena. If someone opalize the bethena then the bethena opalize the nettie. If someone opalize the bethena then they see the bethena. The bethena is not red.", "logic": "\nOpalize(bethena, marcos)\nAdulatory(marcos)\nTenant(nettie, karlee)\nOpalize(karlee, marcos)\nforall x (Keratinize(x, nettie) -> Adulatory(nettie))\nforall x (Opalize(x, nettie) and Keratinize(x, karlee) -> Keratinize(nettie, marcos))\nforall x (Adulatory(x) -> Keratinize(x, nettie))\nforall x (Opalize(x, karlee) -> Tenant(karlee, bethena))\nforall x (Opalize(x, bethena) -> Opalize(bethena, nettie))\nforall x (Opalize(x, bethena) -> Tenant(x, bethena))\n\nnot Red(bethena)\n\nnot Red(bethena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The hamel brainwash the karolina. The karolina is priestly. The hanna bemock the bess. The bess brainwash the karolina. If someone resettle the hanna then the hanna is priestly. If someone brainwash the hanna and they eat the bess then the hanna resettle the karolina. If someone is priestly then they eat the hanna. If someone brainwash the bess then the bess bemock the hamel. If someone brainwash the hamel then the hamel brainwash the hanna. If someone brainwash the hamel then they see the hamel. The hanna bemock the hanna.", "logic": "\nBrainwash(hamel, karolina)\nPriestly(karolina)\nBemock(hanna, bess)\nBrainwash(bess, karolina)\nforall x (Resettle(x, hanna) -> Priestly(hanna))\nforall x (Brainwash(x, hanna) and Resettle(x, bess) -> Resettle(hanna, karolina))\nforall x (Priestly(x) -> Resettle(x, hanna))\nforall x (Brainwash(x, bess) -> Bemock(bess, hamel))\nforall x (Brainwash(x, hamel) -> Brainwash(hamel, hanna))\nforall x (Brainwash(x, hamel) -> Bemock(x, hamel))\n\nBemock(hanna, hanna)\n\nBemock(hanna, hanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The colin halloo the nolana. The nolana is fussy. The virginia beguile the dede. The dede halloo the nolana. If someone quail the virginia then the virginia is fussy. If someone halloo the virginia and they eat the dede then the virginia quail the nolana. If someone is fussy then they eat the virginia. If someone halloo the dede then the dede beguile the colin. If someone halloo the colin then the colin halloo the virginia. If someone halloo the colin then they see the colin. The virginia does not eat the dede.", "logic": "\nHalloo(colin, nolana)\nFussy(nolana)\nBeguile(virginia, dede)\nHalloo(dede, nolana)\nforall x (Quail(x, virginia) -> Fussy(virginia))\nforall x (Halloo(x, virginia) and Quail(x, dede) -> Quail(virginia, nolana))\nforall x (Fussy(x) -> Quail(x, virginia))\nforall x (Halloo(x, dede) -> Beguile(dede, colin))\nforall x (Halloo(x, colin) -> Halloo(colin, virginia))\nforall x (Halloo(x, colin) -> Beguile(x, colin))\n\nnot Quail(virginia, dede)\n\nnot Quail(virginia, dede) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The pru damn the benson. The benson is breathed. The calvin fumble the elfreda. The elfreda damn the benson. If someone flow the calvin then the calvin is breathed. If someone damn the calvin and they eat the elfreda then the calvin flow the benson. If someone is breathed then they eat the calvin. If someone damn the elfreda then the elfreda fumble the pru. If someone damn the pru then the pru damn the calvin. If someone damn the pru then they see the pru. The calvin is red.", "logic": "\nDamn(pru, benson)\nBreathed(benson)\nFumble(calvin, elfreda)\nDamn(elfreda, benson)\nforall x (Flow(x, calvin) -> Breathed(calvin))\nforall x (Damn(x, calvin) and Flow(x, elfreda) -> Flow(calvin, benson))\nforall x (Breathed(x) -> Flow(x, calvin))\nforall x (Damn(x, elfreda) -> Fumble(elfreda, pru))\nforall x (Damn(x, pru) -> Damn(pru, calvin))\nforall x (Damn(x, pru) -> Fumble(x, pru))\n\nRed(calvin)\n\nRed(calvin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-228"} {"premises": "The son lash the casper. The son lash the martin. The son is auld. The casper is auld. The casper purple the marketa. The marketa does not eat the casper. The marketa purple the son. The marketa purple the casper. The marketa does not need the martin. The martin is auld. If someone lash the son and the son lash the marketa then the marketa purple the martin. If someone purple the marketa then they are mucosal. If someone blank the casper and the casper purple the marketa then the casper is auld. If someone lash the martin and they do not need the martin then they chase the casper. All auld, mucosal people are upwind. If someone is upwind then they eat the martin. If someone is shorn and they eat the marketa then they chase the martin. If someone is upwind and they chase the son then they chase the martin. The casper purple the marketa.", "logic": "\nLash(son, casper)\nLash(son, martin)\nAuld(son)\nAuld(casper)\nPurple(casper, marketa)\nnot Lash(marketa, casper)\nPurple(marketa, son)\nPurple(marketa, casper)\nnot Purple(marketa, martin)\nAuld(martin)\nforall x (Lash(x, son) and Lash(son, marketa) -> Purple(marketa, martin))\nforall x (Purple(x, marketa) -> Mucosal(x))\nforall x (Blank(x, casper) and Purple(casper, marketa) -> Auld(casper))\nforall x (Lash(x, martin) and not Purple(x, martin) -> Blank(x, casper))\nforall x (Auld(x) and Mucosal(x) -> Upwind(x))\nforall x (Upwind(x) -> Lash(x, martin))\nforall x (Shorn(x) and Lash(x, marketa) -> Blank(x, martin))\nforall x (Upwind(x) and Blank(x, son) -> Blank(x, martin))\n\nPurple(casper, marketa)\n\ntherefore Purple(casper, marketa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The carissa shellack the shandra. The carissa shellack the francine. The carissa is untufted. The shandra is untufted. The shandra dismantle the andrey. The andrey does not eat the shandra. The andrey dismantle the carissa. The andrey dismantle the shandra. The andrey does not need the francine. The francine is untufted. If someone shellack the carissa and the carissa shellack the andrey then the andrey dismantle the francine. If someone dismantle the andrey then they are austere. If someone dower the shandra and the shandra dismantle the andrey then the shandra is untufted. If someone shellack the francine and they do not need the francine then they chase the shandra. All untufted, austere people are uninominal. If someone is uninominal then they eat the francine. If someone is manque and they eat the andrey then they chase the francine. If someone is uninominal and they chase the carissa then they chase the francine. The shandra is not untufted.", "logic": "\nShellack(carissa, shandra)\nShellack(carissa, francine)\nUntufted(carissa)\nUntufted(shandra)\nDismantle(shandra, andrey)\nnot Shellack(andrey, shandra)\nDismantle(andrey, carissa)\nDismantle(andrey, shandra)\nnot Dismantle(andrey, francine)\nUntufted(francine)\nforall x (Shellack(x, carissa) and Shellack(carissa, andrey) -> Dismantle(andrey, francine))\nforall x (Dismantle(x, andrey) -> Austere(x))\nforall x (Dower(x, shandra) and Dismantle(shandra, andrey) -> Untufted(shandra))\nforall x (Shellack(x, francine) and not Dismantle(x, francine) -> Dower(x, shandra))\nforall x (Untufted(x) and Austere(x) -> Uninominal(x))\nforall x (Uninominal(x) -> Shellack(x, francine))\nforall x (Manque(x) and Shellack(x, andrey) -> Dower(x, francine))\nforall x (Uninominal(x) and Dower(x, carissa) -> Dower(x, francine))\n\nnot Untufted(shandra)\n\ntherefore Untufted(shandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The clareta splatter the kitty. The clareta splatter the theresa. The clareta is infrahuman. The kitty is infrahuman. The kitty bundle the stella. The stella does not eat the kitty. The stella bundle the clareta. The stella bundle the kitty. The stella does not need the theresa. The theresa is infrahuman. If someone splatter the clareta and the clareta splatter the stella then the stella bundle the theresa. If someone bundle the stella then they are drunken. If someone manoeuver the kitty and the kitty bundle the stella then the kitty is infrahuman. If someone splatter the theresa and they do not need the theresa then they chase the kitty. All infrahuman, drunken people are mexican. If someone is mexican then they eat the theresa. If someone is cubistic and they eat the stella then they chase the theresa. If someone is mexican and they chase the clareta then they chase the theresa. The kitty is drunken.", "logic": "\nSplatter(clareta, kitty)\nSplatter(clareta, theresa)\nInfrahuman(clareta)\nInfrahuman(kitty)\nBundle(kitty, stella)\nnot Splatter(stella, kitty)\nBundle(stella, clareta)\nBundle(stella, kitty)\nnot Bundle(stella, theresa)\nInfrahuman(theresa)\nforall x (Splatter(x, clareta) and Splatter(clareta, stella) -> Bundle(stella, theresa))\nforall x (Bundle(x, stella) -> Drunken(x))\nforall x (Manoeuver(x, kitty) and Bundle(kitty, stella) -> Infrahuman(kitty))\nforall x (Splatter(x, theresa) and not Bundle(x, theresa) -> Manoeuver(x, kitty))\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) and Drunken(x) -> Mexican(x))\nforall x (Mexican(x) -> Splatter(x, theresa))\nforall x (Cubistic(x) and Splatter(x, stella) -> Manoeuver(x, theresa))\nforall x (Mexican(x) and Manoeuver(x, clareta) -> Manoeuver(x, theresa))\n\nDrunken(kitty)\n\nBundle(kitty, stella) and forall x (Bundle(x, stella) -> Drunken(x)) -> therefore Drunken(kitty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The natale shoehorn the ansell. The natale shoehorn the ibrahim. The natale is icelandic. The ansell is icelandic. The ansell glamourise the artie. The artie does not eat the ansell. The artie glamourise the natale. The artie glamourise the ansell. The artie does not need the ibrahim. The ibrahim is icelandic. If someone shoehorn the natale and the natale shoehorn the artie then the artie glamourise the ibrahim. If someone glamourise the artie then they are banned. If someone gobble the ansell and the ansell glamourise the artie then the ansell is icelandic. If someone shoehorn the ibrahim and they do not need the ibrahim then they chase the ansell. All icelandic, banned people are errorless. If someone is errorless then they eat the ibrahim. If someone is haematic and they eat the artie then they chase the ibrahim. If someone is errorless and they chase the natale then they chase the ibrahim. The ansell is not banned.", "logic": "\nShoehorn(natale, ansell)\nShoehorn(natale, ibrahim)\nIcelandic(natale)\nIcelandic(ansell)\nGlamourise(ansell, artie)\nnot Shoehorn(artie, ansell)\nGlamourise(artie, natale)\nGlamourise(artie, ansell)\nnot Glamourise(artie, ibrahim)\nIcelandic(ibrahim)\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, natale) and Shoehorn(natale, artie) -> Glamourise(artie, ibrahim))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, artie) -> Banned(x))\nforall x (Gobble(x, ansell) and Glamourise(ansell, artie) -> Icelandic(ansell))\nforall x (Shoehorn(x, ibrahim) and not Glamourise(x, ibrahim) -> Gobble(x, ansell))\nforall x (Icelandic(x) and Banned(x) -> Errorless(x))\nforall x (Errorless(x) -> Shoehorn(x, ibrahim))\nforall x (Haematic(x) and Shoehorn(x, artie) -> Gobble(x, ibrahim))\nforall x (Errorless(x) and Gobble(x, natale) -> Gobble(x, ibrahim))\n\nnot Banned(ansell)\n\nGlamourise(ansell, artie) and forall x (Glamourise(x, artie) -> Banned(x)) -> therefore Banned(ansell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The sunny scud the patricia. The sunny scud the fionnula. The sunny is plumping. The patricia is plumping. The patricia coconspire the shena. The shena does not eat the patricia. The shena coconspire the sunny. The shena coconspire the patricia. The shena does not need the fionnula. The fionnula is plumping. If someone scud the sunny and the sunny scud the shena then the shena coconspire the fionnula. If someone coconspire the shena then they are pitted. If someone idealize the patricia and the patricia coconspire the shena then the patricia is plumping. If someone scud the fionnula and they do not need the fionnula then they chase the patricia. All plumping, pitted people are unbuttoned. If someone is unbuttoned then they eat the fionnula. If someone is humorous and they eat the shena then they chase the fionnula. If someone is unbuttoned and they chase the sunny then they chase the fionnula. The patricia is unbuttoned.", "logic": "\nScud(sunny, patricia)\nScud(sunny, fionnula)\nPlumping(sunny)\nPlumping(patricia)\nCoconspire(patricia, shena)\nnot Scud(shena, patricia)\nCoconspire(shena, sunny)\nCoconspire(shena, patricia)\nnot Coconspire(shena, fionnula)\nPlumping(fionnula)\nforall x (Scud(x, sunny) and Scud(sunny, shena) -> Coconspire(shena, fionnula))\nforall x (Coconspire(x, shena) -> Pitted(x))\nforall x (Idealize(x, patricia) and Coconspire(patricia, shena) -> Plumping(patricia))\nforall x (Scud(x, fionnula) and not Coconspire(x, fionnula) -> Idealize(x, patricia))\nforall x (Plumping(x) and Pitted(x) -> Unbuttoned(x))\nforall x (Unbuttoned(x) -> Scud(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Humorous(x) and Scud(x, shena) -> Idealize(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Unbuttoned(x) and Idealize(x, sunny) -> Idealize(x, fionnula))\n\nUnbuttoned(patricia)\n\nCoconspire(patricia, shena) and forall x (Coconspire(x, shena) -> Pitted(x)) -> therefore Pitted(patricia) Plumping(patricia) and Pitted(patricia) and forall x (Plumping(x) and Pitted(x) -> Unbuttoned(x)) -> therefore Unbuttoned(patricia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The ines subsume the kiah. The ines subsume the curtis. The ines is riemannian. The kiah is riemannian. The kiah coquette the margarete. The margarete does not eat the kiah. The margarete coquette the ines. The margarete coquette the kiah. The margarete does not need the curtis. The curtis is riemannian. If someone subsume the ines and the ines subsume the margarete then the margarete coquette the curtis. If someone coquette the margarete then they are allometric. If someone straighten the kiah and the kiah coquette the margarete then the kiah is riemannian. If someone subsume the curtis and they do not need the curtis then they chase the kiah. All riemannian, allometric people are untested. If someone is untested then they eat the curtis. If someone is groovy and they eat the margarete then they chase the curtis. If someone is untested and they chase the ines then they chase the curtis. The kiah is not untested.", "logic": "\nSubsume(ines, kiah)\nSubsume(ines, curtis)\nRiemannian(ines)\nRiemannian(kiah)\nCoquette(kiah, margarete)\nnot Subsume(margarete, kiah)\nCoquette(margarete, ines)\nCoquette(margarete, kiah)\nnot Coquette(margarete, curtis)\nRiemannian(curtis)\nforall x (Subsume(x, ines) and Subsume(ines, margarete) -> Coquette(margarete, curtis))\nforall x (Coquette(x, margarete) -> Allometric(x))\nforall x (Straighten(x, kiah) and Coquette(kiah, margarete) -> Riemannian(kiah))\nforall x (Subsume(x, curtis) and not Coquette(x, curtis) -> Straighten(x, kiah))\nforall x (Riemannian(x) and Allometric(x) -> Untested(x))\nforall x (Untested(x) -> Subsume(x, curtis))\nforall x (Groovy(x) and Subsume(x, margarete) -> Straighten(x, curtis))\nforall x (Untested(x) and Straighten(x, ines) -> Straighten(x, curtis))\n\nnot Untested(kiah)\n\nCoquette(kiah, margarete) and forall x (Coquette(x, margarete) -> Allometric(x)) -> therefore Allometric(kiah) Riemannian(kiah) and Allometric(kiah) and forall x (Riemannian(x) and Allometric(x) -> Untested(x)) -> therefore Untested(kiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The chandler toss the margeaux. The chandler toss the anette. The chandler is papuan. The margeaux is papuan. The margeaux rack the raf. The raf does not eat the margeaux. The raf rack the chandler. The raf rack the margeaux. The raf does not need the anette. The anette is papuan. If someone toss the chandler and the chandler toss the raf then the raf rack the anette. If someone rack the raf then they are ruled. If someone letter the margeaux and the margeaux rack the raf then the margeaux is papuan. If someone toss the anette and they do not need the anette then they chase the margeaux. All papuan, ruled people are mammary. If someone is mammary then they eat the anette. If someone is isopteran and they eat the raf then they chase the anette. If someone is mammary and they chase the chandler then they chase the anette. The margeaux toss the anette.", "logic": "\nToss(chandler, margeaux)\nToss(chandler, anette)\nPapuan(chandler)\nPapuan(margeaux)\nRack(margeaux, raf)\nnot Toss(raf, margeaux)\nRack(raf, chandler)\nRack(raf, margeaux)\nnot Rack(raf, anette)\nPapuan(anette)\nforall x (Toss(x, chandler) and Toss(chandler, raf) -> Rack(raf, anette))\nforall x (Rack(x, raf) -> Ruled(x))\nforall x (Letter(x, margeaux) and Rack(margeaux, raf) -> Papuan(margeaux))\nforall x (Toss(x, anette) and not Rack(x, anette) -> Letter(x, margeaux))\nforall x (Papuan(x) and Ruled(x) -> Mammary(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) -> Toss(x, anette))\nforall x (Isopteran(x) and Toss(x, raf) -> Letter(x, anette))\nforall x (Mammary(x) and Letter(x, chandler) -> Letter(x, anette))\n\nToss(margeaux, anette)\n\nRack(margeaux, raf) and forall x (Rack(x, raf) -> Ruled(x)) -> therefore Ruled(margeaux) Papuan(margeaux) and Ruled(margeaux) and forall x (Papuan(x) and Ruled(x) -> Mammary(x)) -> therefore Mammary(margeaux) Mammary(margeaux) and forall x (Mammary(x) -> Toss(x, anette)) -> therefore Toss(margeaux, anette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The brooks tiller the torrin. The brooks tiller the adiana. The brooks is waiting. The torrin is waiting. The torrin surf the adele. The adele does not eat the torrin. The adele surf the brooks. The adele surf the torrin. The adele does not need the adiana. The adiana is waiting. If someone tiller the brooks and the brooks tiller the adele then the adele surf the adiana. If someone surf the adele then they are modernised. If someone produce the torrin and the torrin surf the adele then the torrin is waiting. If someone tiller the adiana and they do not need the adiana then they chase the torrin. All waiting, modernised people are amphoteric. If someone is amphoteric then they eat the adiana. If someone is brunet and they eat the adele then they chase the adiana. If someone is amphoteric and they chase the brooks then they chase the adiana. The torrin does not eat the adiana.", "logic": "\nTiller(brooks, torrin)\nTiller(brooks, adiana)\nWaiting(brooks)\nWaiting(torrin)\nSurf(torrin, adele)\nnot Tiller(adele, torrin)\nSurf(adele, brooks)\nSurf(adele, torrin)\nnot Surf(adele, adiana)\nWaiting(adiana)\nforall x (Tiller(x, brooks) and Tiller(brooks, adele) -> Surf(adele, adiana))\nforall x (Surf(x, adele) -> Modernised(x))\nforall x (Produce(x, torrin) and Surf(torrin, adele) -> Waiting(torrin))\nforall x (Tiller(x, adiana) and not Surf(x, adiana) -> Produce(x, torrin))\nforall x (Waiting(x) and Modernised(x) -> Amphoteric(x))\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) -> Tiller(x, adiana))\nforall x (Brunet(x) and Tiller(x, adele) -> Produce(x, adiana))\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) and Produce(x, brooks) -> Produce(x, adiana))\n\nnot Tiller(torrin, adiana)\n\nSurf(torrin, adele) and forall x (Surf(x, adele) -> Modernised(x)) -> therefore Modernised(torrin) Waiting(torrin) and Modernised(torrin) and forall x (Waiting(x) and Modernised(x) -> Amphoteric(x)) -> therefore Amphoteric(torrin) Amphoteric(torrin) and forall x (Amphoteric(x) -> Tiller(x, adiana)) -> therefore Tiller(torrin, adiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The adina sputter the gwyn. The adina sputter the silas. The adina is reticular. The gwyn is reticular. The gwyn abscond the emmalee. The emmalee does not eat the gwyn. The emmalee abscond the adina. The emmalee abscond the gwyn. The emmalee does not need the silas. The silas is reticular. If someone sputter the adina and the adina sputter the emmalee then the emmalee abscond the silas. If someone abscond the emmalee then they are bilious. If someone scramble the gwyn and the gwyn abscond the emmalee then the gwyn is reticular. If someone sputter the silas and they do not need the silas then they chase the gwyn. All reticular, bilious people are attired. If someone is attired then they eat the silas. If someone is hemostatic and they eat the emmalee then they chase the silas. If someone is attired and they chase the adina then they chase the silas. The emmalee does not chase the gwyn.", "logic": "\nSputter(adina, gwyn)\nSputter(adina, silas)\nReticular(adina)\nReticular(gwyn)\nAbscond(gwyn, emmalee)\nnot Sputter(emmalee, gwyn)\nAbscond(emmalee, adina)\nAbscond(emmalee, gwyn)\nnot Abscond(emmalee, silas)\nReticular(silas)\nforall x (Sputter(x, adina) and Sputter(adina, emmalee) -> Abscond(emmalee, silas))\nforall x (Abscond(x, emmalee) -> Bilious(x))\nforall x (Scramble(x, gwyn) and Abscond(gwyn, emmalee) -> Reticular(gwyn))\nforall x (Sputter(x, silas) and not Abscond(x, silas) -> Scramble(x, gwyn))\nforall x (Reticular(x) and Bilious(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Attired(x) -> Sputter(x, silas))\nforall x (Hemostatic(x) and Sputter(x, emmalee) -> Scramble(x, silas))\nforall x (Attired(x) and Scramble(x, adina) -> Scramble(x, silas))\n\nnot Scramble(emmalee, gwyn)\n\nforall x (Sputter(x, silas) and not Abscond(x, silas) -> Scramble(x, gwyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The portia nose the catherina. The portia nose the nada. The portia is esoteric. The catherina is esoteric. The catherina outnumber the john. The john does not eat the catherina. The john outnumber the portia. The john outnumber the catherina. The john does not need the nada. The nada is esoteric. If someone nose the portia and the portia nose the john then the john outnumber the nada. If someone outnumber the john then they are shorthand. If someone contest the catherina and the catherina outnumber the john then the catherina is esoteric. If someone nose the nada and they do not need the nada then they chase the catherina. All esoteric, shorthand people are unequal. If someone is unequal then they eat the nada. If someone is quaternary and they eat the john then they chase the nada. If someone is unequal and they chase the portia then they chase the nada. The portia contest the nada.", "logic": "\nNose(portia, catherina)\nNose(portia, nada)\nEsoteric(portia)\nEsoteric(catherina)\nOutnumber(catherina, john)\nnot Nose(john, catherina)\nOutnumber(john, portia)\nOutnumber(john, catherina)\nnot Outnumber(john, nada)\nEsoteric(nada)\nforall x (Nose(x, portia) and Nose(portia, john) -> Outnumber(john, nada))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, john) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Contest(x, catherina) and Outnumber(catherina, john) -> Esoteric(catherina))\nforall x (Nose(x, nada) and not Outnumber(x, nada) -> Contest(x, catherina))\nforall x (Esoteric(x) and Shorthand(x) -> Unequal(x))\nforall x (Unequal(x) -> Nose(x, nada))\nforall x (Quaternary(x) and Nose(x, john) -> Contest(x, nada))\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Contest(x, portia) -> Contest(x, nada))\n\nContest(portia, nada)\n\nforall x (Quaternary(x) and Nose(x, john) -> Contest(x, nada)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The quiggly chronicle the orin. The quiggly chronicle the lenard. The quiggly is desiccated. The orin is desiccated. The orin carry the franny. The franny does not eat the orin. The franny carry the quiggly. The franny carry the orin. The franny does not need the lenard. The lenard is desiccated. If someone chronicle the quiggly and the quiggly chronicle the franny then the franny carry the lenard. If someone carry the franny then they are antiguan. If someone tinge the orin and the orin carry the franny then the orin is desiccated. If someone chronicle the lenard and they do not need the lenard then they chase the orin. All desiccated, antiguan people are astatic. If someone is astatic then they eat the lenard. If someone is puerperal and they eat the franny then they chase the lenard. If someone is astatic and they chase the quiggly then they chase the lenard. The franny does not chase the lenard.", "logic": "\nChronicle(quiggly, orin)\nChronicle(quiggly, lenard)\nDesiccated(quiggly)\nDesiccated(orin)\nCarry(orin, franny)\nnot Chronicle(franny, orin)\nCarry(franny, quiggly)\nCarry(franny, orin)\nnot Carry(franny, lenard)\nDesiccated(lenard)\nforall x (Chronicle(x, quiggly) and Chronicle(quiggly, franny) -> Carry(franny, lenard))\nforall x (Carry(x, franny) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Tinge(x, orin) and Carry(orin, franny) -> Desiccated(orin))\nforall x (Chronicle(x, lenard) and not Carry(x, lenard) -> Tinge(x, orin))\nforall x (Desiccated(x) and Antiguan(x) -> Astatic(x))\nforall x (Astatic(x) -> Chronicle(x, lenard))\nforall x (Puerperal(x) and Chronicle(x, franny) -> Tinge(x, lenard))\nforall x (Astatic(x) and Tinge(x, quiggly) -> Tinge(x, lenard))\n\nnot Tinge(franny, lenard)\n\nforall x (Puerperal(x) and Chronicle(x, franny) -> Tinge(x, lenard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The french gang the cristal. The french gang the brad. The french is bolometric. The cristal is bolometric. The cristal wiggle the claus. The claus does not eat the cristal. The claus wiggle the french. The claus wiggle the cristal. The claus does not need the brad. The brad is bolometric. If someone gang the french and the french gang the claus then the claus wiggle the brad. If someone wiggle the claus then they are syncretic. If someone goad the cristal and the cristal wiggle the claus then the cristal is bolometric. If someone gang the brad and they do not need the brad then they chase the cristal. All bolometric, syncretic people are headlong. If someone is headlong then they eat the brad. If someone is unknowable and they eat the claus then they chase the brad. If someone is headlong and they chase the french then they chase the brad. The brad goad the brad.", "logic": "\nGang(french, cristal)\nGang(french, brad)\nBolometric(french)\nBolometric(cristal)\nWiggle(cristal, claus)\nnot Gang(claus, cristal)\nWiggle(claus, french)\nWiggle(claus, cristal)\nnot Wiggle(claus, brad)\nBolometric(brad)\nforall x (Gang(x, french) and Gang(french, claus) -> Wiggle(claus, brad))\nforall x (Wiggle(x, claus) -> Syncretic(x))\nforall x (Goad(x, cristal) and Wiggle(cristal, claus) -> Bolometric(cristal))\nforall x (Gang(x, brad) and not Wiggle(x, brad) -> Goad(x, cristal))\nforall x (Bolometric(x) and Syncretic(x) -> Headlong(x))\nforall x (Headlong(x) -> Gang(x, brad))\nforall x (Unknowable(x) and Gang(x, claus) -> Goad(x, brad))\nforall x (Headlong(x) and Goad(x, french) -> Goad(x, brad))\n\nGoad(brad, brad)\n\nforall x (Unknowable(x) and Gang(x, claus) -> Goad(x, brad)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The tessa dismiss the susann. The tessa dismiss the faina. The tessa is foreign. The susann is foreign. The susann sail the bobbette. The bobbette does not eat the susann. The bobbette sail the tessa. The bobbette sail the susann. The bobbette does not need the faina. The faina is foreign. If someone dismiss the tessa and the tessa dismiss the bobbette then the bobbette sail the faina. If someone sail the bobbette then they are itchy. If someone cosign the susann and the susann sail the bobbette then the susann is foreign. If someone dismiss the faina and they do not need the faina then they chase the susann. All foreign, itchy people are nethermost. If someone is nethermost then they eat the faina. If someone is sidereal and they eat the bobbette then they chase the faina. If someone is nethermost and they chase the tessa then they chase the faina. The bobbette does not need the bobbette.", "logic": "\nDismiss(tessa, susann)\nDismiss(tessa, faina)\nForeign(tessa)\nForeign(susann)\nSail(susann, bobbette)\nnot Dismiss(bobbette, susann)\nSail(bobbette, tessa)\nSail(bobbette, susann)\nnot Sail(bobbette, faina)\nForeign(faina)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, tessa) and Dismiss(tessa, bobbette) -> Sail(bobbette, faina))\nforall x (Sail(x, bobbette) -> Itchy(x))\nforall x (Cosign(x, susann) and Sail(susann, bobbette) -> Foreign(susann))\nforall x (Dismiss(x, faina) and not Sail(x, faina) -> Cosign(x, susann))\nforall x (Foreign(x) and Itchy(x) -> Nethermost(x))\nforall x (Nethermost(x) -> Dismiss(x, faina))\nforall x (Sidereal(x) and Dismiss(x, bobbette) -> Cosign(x, faina))\nforall x (Nethermost(x) and Cosign(x, tessa) -> Cosign(x, faina))\n\nnot Sail(bobbette, bobbette)\n\nnot Sail(bobbette, bobbette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The tatum throne the cybal. The tatum throne the vally. The tatum is papillary. The cybal is papillary. The cybal draw the adi. The adi does not eat the cybal. The adi draw the tatum. The adi draw the cybal. The adi does not need the vally. The vally is papillary. If someone throne the tatum and the tatum throne the adi then the adi draw the vally. If someone draw the adi then they are alvine. If someone riffle the cybal and the cybal draw the adi then the cybal is papillary. If someone throne the vally and they do not need the vally then they chase the cybal. All papillary, alvine people are gratuitous. If someone is gratuitous then they eat the vally. If someone is hairy and they eat the adi then they chase the vally. If someone is gratuitous and they chase the tatum then they chase the vally. The cybal is hairy.", "logic": "\nThrone(tatum, cybal)\nThrone(tatum, vally)\nPapillary(tatum)\nPapillary(cybal)\nDraw(cybal, adi)\nnot Throne(adi, cybal)\nDraw(adi, tatum)\nDraw(adi, cybal)\nnot Draw(adi, vally)\nPapillary(vally)\nforall x (Throne(x, tatum) and Throne(tatum, adi) -> Draw(adi, vally))\nforall x (Draw(x, adi) -> Alvine(x))\nforall x (Riffle(x, cybal) and Draw(cybal, adi) -> Papillary(cybal))\nforall x (Throne(x, vally) and not Draw(x, vally) -> Riffle(x, cybal))\nforall x (Papillary(x) and Alvine(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) -> Throne(x, vally))\nforall x (Hairy(x) and Throne(x, adi) -> Riffle(x, vally))\nforall x (Gratuitous(x) and Riffle(x, tatum) -> Riffle(x, vally))\n\nHairy(cybal)\n\nHairy(cybal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The juan prompt the daisey. The juan prompt the gusella. The juan is prophetic. The daisey is prophetic. The daisey readmit the ken. The ken does not eat the daisey. The ken readmit the juan. The ken readmit the daisey. The ken does not need the gusella. The gusella is prophetic. If someone prompt the juan and the juan prompt the ken then the ken readmit the gusella. If someone readmit the ken then they are gregorian. If someone summarize the daisey and the daisey readmit the ken then the daisey is prophetic. If someone prompt the gusella and they do not need the gusella then they chase the daisey. All prophetic, gregorian people are asserted. If someone is asserted then they eat the gusella. If someone is unassisted and they eat the ken then they chase the gusella. If someone is asserted and they chase the juan then they chase the gusella. The daisey does not eat the ken.", "logic": "\nPrompt(juan, daisey)\nPrompt(juan, gusella)\nProphetic(juan)\nProphetic(daisey)\nReadmit(daisey, ken)\nnot Prompt(ken, daisey)\nReadmit(ken, juan)\nReadmit(ken, daisey)\nnot Readmit(ken, gusella)\nProphetic(gusella)\nforall x (Prompt(x, juan) and Prompt(juan, ken) -> Readmit(ken, gusella))\nforall x (Readmit(x, ken) -> Gregorian(x))\nforall x (Summarize(x, daisey) and Readmit(daisey, ken) -> Prophetic(daisey))\nforall x (Prompt(x, gusella) and not Readmit(x, gusella) -> Summarize(x, daisey))\nforall x (Prophetic(x) and Gregorian(x) -> Asserted(x))\nforall x (Asserted(x) -> Prompt(x, gusella))\nforall x (Unassisted(x) and Prompt(x, ken) -> Summarize(x, gusella))\nforall x (Asserted(x) and Summarize(x, juan) -> Summarize(x, gusella))\n\nnot Prompt(daisey, ken)\n\nnot Prompt(daisey, ken) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The dollie channelize the dulci. The dollie channelize the anais. The dollie is beamish. The dulci is beamish. The dulci shade the harvie. The harvie does not eat the dulci. The harvie shade the dollie. The harvie shade the dulci. The harvie does not need the anais. The anais is beamish. If someone channelize the dollie and the dollie channelize the harvie then the harvie shade the anais. If someone shade the harvie then they are harmonious. If someone twitter the dulci and the dulci shade the harvie then the dulci is beamish. If someone channelize the anais and they do not need the anais then they chase the dulci. All beamish, harmonious people are pinioned. If someone is pinioned then they eat the anais. If someone is malevolent and they eat the harvie then they chase the anais. If someone is pinioned and they chase the dollie then they chase the anais. The anais shade the dulci.", "logic": "\nChannelize(dollie, dulci)\nChannelize(dollie, anais)\nBeamish(dollie)\nBeamish(dulci)\nShade(dulci, harvie)\nnot Channelize(harvie, dulci)\nShade(harvie, dollie)\nShade(harvie, dulci)\nnot Shade(harvie, anais)\nBeamish(anais)\nforall x (Channelize(x, dollie) and Channelize(dollie, harvie) -> Shade(harvie, anais))\nforall x (Shade(x, harvie) -> Harmonious(x))\nforall x (Twitter(x, dulci) and Shade(dulci, harvie) -> Beamish(dulci))\nforall x (Channelize(x, anais) and not Shade(x, anais) -> Twitter(x, dulci))\nforall x (Beamish(x) and Harmonious(x) -> Pinioned(x))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) -> Channelize(x, anais))\nforall x (Malevolent(x) and Channelize(x, harvie) -> Twitter(x, anais))\nforall x (Pinioned(x) and Twitter(x, dollie) -> Twitter(x, anais))\n\nShade(anais, dulci)\n\nShade(anais, dulci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1169"} {"premises": "The stinky itemise the christin. The christin is not emarginate. If the stinky does not like the christin then the stinky joint the christin. If someone itemise the christin then they are emarginate. If someone joint the christin and they do not like the christin then they do not need the christin. If someone itemise the christin and the christin cushion the stinky then they like the stinky. If someone cushion the stinky then they do not eat the stinky. If someone is emarginate and they do not eat the christin then they do not eat the stinky. If someone is bright and they do not eat the stinky then the stinky is bright. All bright people are refreshful. The christin is not emarginate.", "logic": "\nItemise(stinky, christin)\nnot Emarginate(christin)\nnot Itemise(stinky, christin) -> Joint(stinky, christin)\nforall x (Itemise(x, christin) -> Emarginate(x))\nforall x (Joint(x, christin) and not Itemise(x, christin) -> not Cushion(x, christin))\nforall x (Itemise(x, christin) and Cushion(christin, stinky) -> Itemise(x, stinky))\nforall x (Cushion(x, stinky) -> not Joint(x, stinky))\nforall x (Emarginate(x) and not Joint(x, christin) -> not Joint(x, stinky))\nforall x (Bright(x) and not Joint(x, stinky) -> Bright(stinky))\nforall x (Bright(x) -> Refreshful(x))\n\nnot Emarginate(christin)\n\ntherefore not Emarginate(christin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "The bert consult the mable. The mable is not tangible. If the bert does not like the mable then the bert front the mable. If someone consult the mable then they are tangible. If someone front the mable and they do not like the mable then they do not need the mable. If someone consult the mable and the mable hoop the bert then they like the bert. If someone hoop the bert then they do not eat the bert. If someone is tangible and they do not eat the mable then they do not eat the bert. If someone is martian and they do not eat the bert then the bert is martian. All martian people are stupid. The bert does not like the mable.", "logic": "\nConsult(bert, mable)\nnot Tangible(mable)\nnot Consult(bert, mable) -> Front(bert, mable)\nforall x (Consult(x, mable) -> Tangible(x))\nforall x (Front(x, mable) and not Consult(x, mable) -> not Hoop(x, mable))\nforall x (Consult(x, mable) and Hoop(mable, bert) -> Consult(x, bert))\nforall x (Hoop(x, bert) -> not Front(x, bert))\nforall x (Tangible(x) and not Front(x, mable) -> not Front(x, bert))\nforall x (Martian(x) and not Front(x, bert) -> Martian(bert))\nforall x (Martian(x) -> Stupid(x))\n\nnot Consult(bert, mable)\n\ntherefore Consult(bert, mable)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "The leoine bubble the waldo. The waldo is not coiling. If the leoine does not like the waldo then the leoine prepay the waldo. If someone bubble the waldo then they are coiling. If someone prepay the waldo and they do not like the waldo then they do not need the waldo. If someone bubble the waldo and the waldo foxhunt the leoine then they like the leoine. If someone foxhunt the leoine then they do not eat the leoine. If someone is coiling and they do not eat the waldo then they do not eat the leoine. If someone is untaxed and they do not eat the leoine then the leoine is untaxed. All untaxed people are unexacting. The waldo does not like the leoine.", "logic": "\nBubble(leoine, waldo)\nnot Coiling(waldo)\nnot Bubble(leoine, waldo) -> Prepay(leoine, waldo)\nforall x (Bubble(x, waldo) -> Coiling(x))\nforall x (Prepay(x, waldo) and not Bubble(x, waldo) -> not Foxhunt(x, waldo))\nforall x (Bubble(x, waldo) and Foxhunt(waldo, leoine) -> Bubble(x, leoine))\nforall x (Foxhunt(x, leoine) -> not Prepay(x, leoine))\nforall x (Coiling(x) and not Prepay(x, waldo) -> not Prepay(x, leoine))\nforall x (Untaxed(x) and not Prepay(x, leoine) -> Untaxed(leoine))\nforall x (Untaxed(x) -> Unexacting(x))\n\nnot Bubble(waldo, leoine)\n\nforall x (Bubble(x, waldo) and Foxhunt(waldo, leoine) -> Bubble(x, leoine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "The chadwick skimp the valery. The valery is not unwedded. If the chadwick does not like the valery then the chadwick besiege the valery. If someone skimp the valery then they are unwedded. If someone besiege the valery and they do not like the valery then they do not need the valery. If someone skimp the valery and the valery verbify the chadwick then they like the chadwick. If someone verbify the chadwick then they do not eat the chadwick. If someone is unwedded and they do not eat the valery then they do not eat the chadwick. If someone is coaxial and they do not eat the chadwick then the chadwick is coaxial. All coaxial people are balmy. The valery is red.", "logic": "\nSkimp(chadwick, valery)\nnot Unwedded(valery)\nnot Skimp(chadwick, valery) -> Besiege(chadwick, valery)\nforall x (Skimp(x, valery) -> Unwedded(x))\nforall x (Besiege(x, valery) and not Skimp(x, valery) -> not Verbify(x, valery))\nforall x (Skimp(x, valery) and Verbify(valery, chadwick) -> Skimp(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Verbify(x, chadwick) -> not Besiege(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Unwedded(x) and not Besiege(x, valery) -> not Besiege(x, chadwick))\nforall x (Coaxial(x) and not Besiege(x, chadwick) -> Coaxial(chadwick))\nforall x (Coaxial(x) -> Balmy(x))\n\nRed(valery)\n\nRed(valery) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1524"} {"premises": "Aristotle is naive. Kiri is articled. Liam is articled. If someone is dislikable then they are indexless. If someone is naive then they are indexless. If Liam is ossicular then Liam is not dislikable. All malicious people are ossicular. If someone is articled then they are dislikable. If someone is malicious and ossicular then they are dislikable. Smart people are definable. If someone is dislikable and not ossicular then they are definable. Aristotle is naive.", "logic": "\nNaive(aristotle)\nArticled(kiri)\nArticled(liam)\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Indexless(x))\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Indexless(x))\nOssicular(liam) -> not Dislikable(liam)\nforall x (Malicious(x) -> Ossicular(x))\nforall x (Articled(x) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Malicious(x) and Ossicular(x) -> Dislikable(x))\nforall x (Indexless(x) -> Definable(x))\nforall x (Dislikable(x) and not Ossicular(x) -> Definable(x))\n\nNaive(aristotle)\n\ntherefore Naive(aristotle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Pierre is endodontic. Jennings is beautiful. Tomkin is beautiful. If someone is unservile then they are unraised. If someone is endodontic then they are unraised. If Tomkin is princely then Tomkin is not unservile. All misogynous people are princely. If someone is beautiful then they are unservile. If someone is misogynous and princely then they are unservile. Smart people are humoral. If someone is unservile and not princely then they are humoral. Jennings is not beautiful.", "logic": "\nEndodontic(pierre)\nBeautiful(jennings)\nBeautiful(tomkin)\nforall x (Unservile(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) -> Unraised(x))\nPrincely(tomkin) -> not Unservile(tomkin)\nforall x (Misogynous(x) -> Princely(x))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Unservile(x))\nforall x (Misogynous(x) and Princely(x) -> Unservile(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> Humoral(x))\nforall x (Unservile(x) and not Princely(x) -> Humoral(x))\n\nnot Beautiful(jennings)\n\ntherefore Beautiful(jennings)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Leif is thievish. Shelli is etiolate. Dimitry is etiolate. If someone is enabling then they are contraband. If someone is thievish then they are contraband. If Dimitry is nonextant then Dimitry is not enabling. All dantesque people are nonextant. If someone is etiolate then they are enabling. If someone is dantesque and nonextant then they are enabling. Smart people are mendicant. If someone is enabling and not nonextant then they are mendicant. Leif is contraband.", "logic": "\nThievish(leif)\nEtiolate(shelli)\nEtiolate(dimitry)\nforall x (Enabling(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Thievish(x) -> Contraband(x))\nNonextant(dimitry) -> not Enabling(dimitry)\nforall x (Dantesque(x) -> Nonextant(x))\nforall x (Etiolate(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Dantesque(x) and Nonextant(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) -> Mendicant(x))\nforall x (Enabling(x) and not Nonextant(x) -> Mendicant(x))\n\nContraband(leif)\n\nThievish(leif) and forall x (Thievish(x) -> Contraband(x)) -> therefore Contraband(leif)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Inesita is systemic. Gisela is apocrine. Sheela is apocrine. If someone is embroiled then they are wizened. If someone is systemic then they are wizened. If Sheela is panoptical then Sheela is not embroiled. All tangled people are panoptical. If someone is apocrine then they are embroiled. If someone is tangled and panoptical then they are embroiled. Smart people are unintended. If someone is embroiled and not panoptical then they are unintended. Inesita is not wizened.", "logic": "\nSystemic(inesita)\nApocrine(gisela)\nApocrine(sheela)\nforall x (Embroiled(x) -> Wizened(x))\nforall x (Systemic(x) -> Wizened(x))\nPanoptical(sheela) -> not Embroiled(sheela)\nforall x (Tangled(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Apocrine(x) -> Embroiled(x))\nforall x (Tangled(x) and Panoptical(x) -> Embroiled(x))\nforall x (Wizened(x) -> Unintended(x))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and not Panoptical(x) -> Unintended(x))\n\nnot Wizened(inesita)\n\nSystemic(inesita) and forall x (Systemic(x) -> Wizened(x)) -> therefore Wizened(inesita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Ajay is ragged. Susanetta is tenth. Andrei is tenth. If someone is unmined then they are endemic. If someone is ragged then they are endemic. If Andrei is southmost then Andrei is not unmined. All rascally people are southmost. If someone is tenth then they are unmined. If someone is rascally and southmost then they are unmined. Smart people are unhatched. If someone is unmined and not southmost then they are unhatched. Ajay is unhatched.", "logic": "\nRagged(ajay)\nTenth(susanetta)\nTenth(andrei)\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> Endemic(x))\nforall x (Ragged(x) -> Endemic(x))\nSouthmost(andrei) -> not Unmined(andrei)\nforall x (Rascally(x) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Unmined(x))\nforall x (Rascally(x) and Southmost(x) -> Unmined(x))\nforall x (Endemic(x) -> Unhatched(x))\nforall x (Unmined(x) and not Southmost(x) -> Unhatched(x))\n\nUnhatched(ajay)\n\nRagged(ajay) and forall x (Ragged(x) -> Endemic(x)) -> therefore Endemic(ajay) Endemic(ajay) and forall x (Endemic(x) -> Unhatched(x)) -> therefore Unhatched(ajay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Fairfax is malted. Cristin is morphemic. Angelique is morphemic. If someone is buckram then they are pubertal. If someone is malted then they are pubertal. If Angelique is praetorial then Angelique is not buckram. All meager people are praetorial. If someone is morphemic then they are buckram. If someone is meager and praetorial then they are buckram. Smart people are adsorbable. If someone is buckram and not praetorial then they are adsorbable. Angelique is not pubertal.", "logic": "\nMalted(fairfax)\nMorphemic(cristin)\nMorphemic(angelique)\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Pubertal(x))\nforall x (Malted(x) -> Pubertal(x))\nPraetorial(angelique) -> not Buckram(angelique)\nforall x (Meager(x) -> Praetorial(x))\nforall x (Morphemic(x) -> Buckram(x))\nforall x (Meager(x) and Praetorial(x) -> Buckram(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) -> Adsorbable(x))\nforall x (Buckram(x) and not Praetorial(x) -> Adsorbable(x))\n\nnot Pubertal(angelique)\n\nMorphemic(angelique) and forall x (Morphemic(x) -> Buckram(x)) -> therefore Buckram(angelique) Buckram(angelique) and forall x (Buckram(x) -> Pubertal(x)) -> therefore Pubertal(angelique)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Francene is sensory. Guglielma is extropic. Jaine is extropic. If someone is polemic then they are unroofed. If someone is sensory then they are unroofed. If Jaine is restive then Jaine is not polemic. All ancillary people are restive. If someone is extropic then they are polemic. If someone is ancillary and restive then they are polemic. Smart people are unexcited. If someone is polemic and not restive then they are unexcited. Jaine is unexcited.", "logic": "\nSensory(francene)\nExtropic(guglielma)\nExtropic(jaine)\nforall x (Polemic(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Unroofed(x))\nRestive(jaine) -> not Polemic(jaine)\nforall x (Ancillary(x) -> Restive(x))\nforall x (Extropic(x) -> Polemic(x))\nforall x (Ancillary(x) and Restive(x) -> Polemic(x))\nforall x (Unroofed(x) -> Unexcited(x))\nforall x (Polemic(x) and not Restive(x) -> Unexcited(x))\n\nUnexcited(jaine)\n\nExtropic(jaine) and forall x (Extropic(x) -> Polemic(x)) -> therefore Polemic(jaine) Polemic(jaine) and forall x (Polemic(x) -> Unroofed(x)) -> therefore Unroofed(jaine) Unroofed(jaine) and forall x (Unroofed(x) -> Unexcited(x)) -> therefore Unexcited(jaine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Jenny is uncool. Marlow is coexisting. Karissa is coexisting. If someone is marital then they are nodulose. If someone is uncool then they are nodulose. If Karissa is burmese then Karissa is not marital. All endoergic people are burmese. If someone is coexisting then they are marital. If someone is endoergic and burmese then they are marital. Smart people are prostate. If someone is marital and not burmese then they are prostate. Marlow is not prostate.", "logic": "\nUncool(jenny)\nCoexisting(marlow)\nCoexisting(karissa)\nforall x (Marital(x) -> Nodulose(x))\nforall x (Uncool(x) -> Nodulose(x))\nBurmese(karissa) -> not Marital(karissa)\nforall x (Endoergic(x) -> Burmese(x))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and Burmese(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Nodulose(x) -> Prostate(x))\nforall x (Marital(x) and not Burmese(x) -> Prostate(x))\n\nnot Prostate(marlow)\n\nCoexisting(marlow) and forall x (Coexisting(x) -> Marital(x)) -> therefore Marital(marlow) Marital(marlow) and forall x (Marital(x) -> Nodulose(x)) -> therefore Nodulose(marlow) Nodulose(marlow) and forall x (Nodulose(x) -> Prostate(x)) -> therefore Prostate(marlow)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Bertina is undiluted. Jervis is elementary. Sherline is elementary. If someone is prize then they are teasing. If someone is undiluted then they are teasing. If Sherline is tapestried then Sherline is not prize. All liplike people are tapestried. If someone is elementary then they are prize. If someone is liplike and tapestried then they are prize. Smart people are breathing. If someone is prize and not tapestried then they are breathing. Jervis is not tapestried.", "logic": "\nUndiluted(bertina)\nElementary(jervis)\nElementary(sherline)\nforall x (Prize(x) -> Teasing(x))\nforall x (Undiluted(x) -> Teasing(x))\nTapestried(sherline) -> not Prize(sherline)\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nforall x (Elementary(x) -> Prize(x))\nforall x (Liplike(x) and Tapestried(x) -> Prize(x))\nforall x (Teasing(x) -> Breathing(x))\nforall x (Prize(x) and not Tapestried(x) -> Breathing(x))\n\nnot Tapestried(jervis)\n\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Tapestried(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Bartie is unmannered. Janeczka is prisonlike. Kris is prisonlike. If someone is brachiate then they are sloshed. If someone is unmannered then they are sloshed. If Kris is frontmost then Kris is not brachiate. All feminine people are frontmost. If someone is prisonlike then they are brachiate. If someone is feminine and frontmost then they are brachiate. Smart people are hypothetic. If someone is brachiate and not frontmost then they are hypothetic. Kris is frontmost.", "logic": "\nUnmannered(bartie)\nPrisonlike(janeczka)\nPrisonlike(kris)\nforall x (Brachiate(x) -> Sloshed(x))\nforall x (Unmannered(x) -> Sloshed(x))\nFrontmost(kris) -> not Brachiate(kris)\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Frontmost(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Brachiate(x))\nforall x (Feminine(x) and Frontmost(x) -> Brachiate(x))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) -> Hypothetic(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and not Frontmost(x) -> Hypothetic(x))\n\nFrontmost(kris)\n\nforall x (Feminine(x) -> Frontmost(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Julie is iritic. Hart is befouled. Lilias is befouled. If someone is chummy then they are eponymous. If someone is iritic then they are eponymous. If Lilias is outer then Lilias is not chummy. All nubile people are outer. If someone is befouled then they are chummy. If someone is nubile and outer then they are chummy. Smart people are enchanting. If someone is chummy and not outer then they are enchanting. Julie is not outer.", "logic": "\nIritic(julie)\nBefouled(hart)\nBefouled(lilias)\nforall x (Chummy(x) -> Eponymous(x))\nforall x (Iritic(x) -> Eponymous(x))\nOuter(lilias) -> not Chummy(lilias)\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Outer(x))\nforall x (Befouled(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Nubile(x) and Outer(x) -> Chummy(x))\nforall x (Eponymous(x) -> Enchanting(x))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and not Outer(x) -> Enchanting(x))\n\nnot Outer(julie)\n\nforall x (Nubile(x) -> Outer(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Langston is farther. Parsifal is voracious. Moses is voracious. If someone is bicentric then they are mined. If someone is farther then they are mined. If Moses is paraplegic then Moses is not bicentric. All scrivened people are paraplegic. If someone is voracious then they are bicentric. If someone is scrivened and paraplegic then they are bicentric. Smart people are grasslike. If someone is bicentric and not paraplegic then they are grasslike. Langston is bicentric.", "logic": "\nFarther(langston)\nVoracious(parsifal)\nVoracious(moses)\nforall x (Bicentric(x) -> Mined(x))\nforall x (Farther(x) -> Mined(x))\nParaplegic(moses) -> not Bicentric(moses)\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nforall x (Voracious(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) and Paraplegic(x) -> Bicentric(x))\nforall x (Mined(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Bicentric(x) and not Paraplegic(x) -> Grasslike(x))\n\nBicentric(langston)\n\nforall x (Voracious(x) -> Bicentric(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Maddy is manx. Nan is accusing. Jared is accusing. If someone is jolly then they are monolithic. If someone is manx then they are monolithic. If Jared is placeable then Jared is not jolly. All bacchanal people are placeable. If someone is accusing then they are jolly. If someone is bacchanal and placeable then they are jolly. Smart people are anuretic. If someone is jolly and not placeable then they are anuretic. Jared is not manx.", "logic": "\nManx(maddy)\nAccusing(nan)\nAccusing(jared)\nforall x (Jolly(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nforall x (Manx(x) -> Monolithic(x))\nPlaceable(jared) -> not Jolly(jared)\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) -> Placeable(x))\nforall x (Accusing(x) -> Jolly(x))\nforall x (Bacchanal(x) and Placeable(x) -> Jolly(x))\nforall x (Monolithic(x) -> Anuretic(x))\nforall x (Jolly(x) and not Placeable(x) -> Anuretic(x))\n\nnot Manx(jared)\n\nnot Manx(jared) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Beulah is nodulated. Carlena is monoicous. Tommie is monoicous. If someone is chordal then they are blocked. If someone is nodulated then they are blocked. If Tommie is plain then Tommie is not chordal. All charming people are plain. If someone is monoicous then they are chordal. If someone is charming and plain then they are chordal. Smart people are awed. If someone is chordal and not plain then they are awed. Beulah is monoicous.", "logic": "\nNodulated(beulah)\nMonoicous(carlena)\nMonoicous(tommie)\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> Blocked(x))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Blocked(x))\nPlain(tommie) -> not Chordal(tommie)\nforall x (Charming(x) -> Plain(x))\nforall x (Monoicous(x) -> Chordal(x))\nforall x (Charming(x) and Plain(x) -> Chordal(x))\nforall x (Blocked(x) -> Awed(x))\nforall x (Chordal(x) and not Plain(x) -> Awed(x))\n\nMonoicous(beulah)\n\nMonoicous(beulah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Coraline is saudi. Hetty is crimson. Catrina is crimson. If someone is gaga then they are slimy. If someone is saudi then they are slimy. If Catrina is knackered then Catrina is not gaga. All chewable people are knackered. If someone is crimson then they are gaga. If someone is chewable and knackered then they are gaga. Smart people are verbose. If someone is gaga and not knackered then they are verbose. Catrina is not chewable.", "logic": "\nSaudi(coraline)\nCrimson(hetty)\nCrimson(catrina)\nforall x (Gaga(x) -> Slimy(x))\nforall x (Saudi(x) -> Slimy(x))\nKnackered(catrina) -> not Gaga(catrina)\nforall x (Chewable(x) -> Knackered(x))\nforall x (Crimson(x) -> Gaga(x))\nforall x (Chewable(x) and Knackered(x) -> Gaga(x))\nforall x (Slimy(x) -> Verbose(x))\nforall x (Gaga(x) and not Knackered(x) -> Verbose(x))\n\nnot Chewable(catrina)\n\nnot Chewable(catrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Selby is advertised. Adelind is expedient. Aurlie is expedient. If someone is reticent then they are sectioned. If someone is advertised then they are sectioned. If Aurlie is saxicolous then Aurlie is not reticent. All afoul people are saxicolous. If someone is expedient then they are reticent. If someone is afoul and saxicolous then they are reticent. Smart people are fatalistic. If someone is reticent and not saxicolous then they are fatalistic. Adelind is afoul.", "logic": "\nAdvertised(selby)\nExpedient(adelind)\nExpedient(aurlie)\nforall x (Reticent(x) -> Sectioned(x))\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> Sectioned(x))\nSaxicolous(aurlie) -> not Reticent(aurlie)\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) -> Reticent(x))\nforall x (Afoul(x) and Saxicolous(x) -> Reticent(x))\nforall x (Sectioned(x) -> Fatalistic(x))\nforall x (Reticent(x) and not Saxicolous(x) -> Fatalistic(x))\n\nAfoul(adelind)\n\nAfoul(adelind) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1670"} {"premises": "Sharyl is recognized. Merrielle is gratified. Tasha is not westbound. Noble is not eellike. All weighty things are awless. If something is gratified then it is laborious. Furry, gratified things are eellike. If something is laborious and not westbound then it is eellike. All laborious things are weighty. If Noble is not westbound then Noble is not recognized. Merrielle is gratified.", "logic": "\nRecognized(sharyl)\nGratified(merrielle)\nnot Westbound(tasha)\nnot Eellike(noble)\nforall x (Weighty(x) -> Awless(x))\nforall x (Gratified(x) -> Laborious(x))\nforall x (Awless(x) and Gratified(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) and not Westbound(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Laborious(x) -> Weighty(x))\nnot Westbound(noble) -> not Recognized(noble)\n\nGratified(merrielle)\n\ntherefore Gratified(merrielle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Lishe is woeful. Hendrika is tortious. Jenilee is not ocellated. Beverlee is not thievish. All intangible things are eellike. If something is tortious then it is married. Furry, tortious things are thievish. If something is married and not ocellated then it is thievish. All married things are intangible. If Beverlee is not ocellated then Beverlee is not woeful. Hendrika is not tortious.", "logic": "\nWoeful(lishe)\nTortious(hendrika)\nnot Ocellated(jenilee)\nnot Thievish(beverlee)\nforall x (Intangible(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Tortious(x) -> Married(x))\nforall x (Eellike(x) and Tortious(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Married(x) and not Ocellated(x) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Married(x) -> Intangible(x))\nnot Ocellated(beverlee) -> not Woeful(beverlee)\n\nnot Tortious(hendrika)\n\ntherefore Tortious(hendrika)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Lemar is grilled. Cal is brilliant. Eleanore is not hesitant. Gussy is not depraved. All unbaptized things are pulpy. If something is brilliant then it is choral. Furry, brilliant things are depraved. If something is choral and not hesitant then it is depraved. All choral things are unbaptized. If Gussy is not hesitant then Gussy is not grilled. Cal is choral.", "logic": "\nGrilled(lemar)\nBrilliant(cal)\nnot Hesitant(eleanore)\nnot Depraved(gussy)\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) -> Pulpy(x))\nforall x (Brilliant(x) -> Choral(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and Brilliant(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Choral(x) and not Hesitant(x) -> Depraved(x))\nforall x (Choral(x) -> Unbaptized(x))\nnot Hesitant(gussy) -> not Grilled(gussy)\n\nChoral(cal)\n\nBrilliant(cal) and forall x (Brilliant(x) -> Choral(x)) -> therefore Choral(cal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Moira is voluble. Pate is pycnotic. Mikako is not insightful. Shelly is not surficial. All fictional things are validated. If something is pycnotic then it is speechless. Furry, pycnotic things are surficial. If something is speechless and not insightful then it is surficial. All speechless things are fictional. If Shelly is not insightful then Shelly is not voluble. Pate is not speechless.", "logic": "\nVoluble(moira)\nPycnotic(pate)\nnot Insightful(mikako)\nnot Surficial(shelly)\nforall x (Fictional(x) -> Validated(x))\nforall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Speechless(x))\nforall x (Validated(x) and Pycnotic(x) -> Surficial(x))\nforall x (Speechless(x) and not Insightful(x) -> Surficial(x))\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Fictional(x))\nnot Insightful(shelly) -> not Voluble(shelly)\n\nnot Speechless(pate)\n\nPycnotic(pate) and forall x (Pycnotic(x) -> Speechless(x)) -> therefore Speechless(pate)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Stevana is athletic. Giorgia is laryngeal. Nadeen is not blebbed. Ravi is not unsheared. All bigmouthed things are unabused. If something is laryngeal then it is cloisonne. Furry, laryngeal things are unsheared. If something is cloisonne and not blebbed then it is unsheared. All cloisonne things are bigmouthed. If Ravi is not blebbed then Ravi is not athletic. Giorgia is bigmouthed.", "logic": "\nAthletic(stevana)\nLaryngeal(giorgia)\nnot Blebbed(nadeen)\nnot Unsheared(ravi)\nforall x (Bigmouthed(x) -> Unabused(x))\nforall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Cloisonne(x))\nforall x (Unabused(x) and Laryngeal(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) and not Blebbed(x) -> Unsheared(x))\nforall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Bigmouthed(x))\nnot Blebbed(ravi) -> not Athletic(ravi)\n\nBigmouthed(giorgia)\n\nLaryngeal(giorgia) and forall x (Laryngeal(x) -> Cloisonne(x)) -> therefore Cloisonne(giorgia) Cloisonne(giorgia) and forall x (Cloisonne(x) -> Bigmouthed(x)) -> therefore Bigmouthed(giorgia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Sherry is rude. Crystie is extrovert. Gabriele is not blond. Stearn is not polygonal. All about things are alight. If something is extrovert then it is uncurbed. Furry, extrovert things are polygonal. If something is uncurbed and not blond then it is polygonal. All uncurbed things are about. If Stearn is not blond then Stearn is not rude. Crystie is not about.", "logic": "\nRude(sherry)\nExtrovert(crystie)\nnot Blond(gabriele)\nnot Polygonal(stearn)\nforall x (About(x) -> Alight(x))\nforall x (Extrovert(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nforall x (Alight(x) and Extrovert(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) and not Blond(x) -> Polygonal(x))\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) -> About(x))\nnot Blond(stearn) -> not Rude(stearn)\n\nnot About(crystie)\n\nExtrovert(crystie) and forall x (Extrovert(x) -> Uncurbed(x)) -> therefore Uncurbed(crystie) Uncurbed(crystie) and forall x (Uncurbed(x) -> About(x)) -> therefore About(crystie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Viv is adust. Fraser is glimmery. Gustav is not eutrophic. Freddi is not dissipated. All burned things are eucaryotic. If something is glimmery then it is wrenching. Furry, glimmery things are dissipated. If something is wrenching and not eutrophic then it is dissipated. All wrenching things are burned. If Freddi is not eutrophic then Freddi is not adust. Fraser is eucaryotic.", "logic": "\nAdust(viv)\nGlimmery(fraser)\nnot Eutrophic(gustav)\nnot Dissipated(freddi)\nforall x (Burned(x) -> Eucaryotic(x))\nforall x (Glimmery(x) -> Wrenching(x))\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) and Glimmery(x) -> Dissipated(x))\nforall x (Wrenching(x) and not Eutrophic(x) -> Dissipated(x))\nforall x (Wrenching(x) -> Burned(x))\nnot Eutrophic(freddi) -> not Adust(freddi)\n\nEucaryotic(fraser)\n\nGlimmery(fraser) and forall x (Glimmery(x) -> Wrenching(x)) -> therefore Wrenching(fraser) Wrenching(fraser) and forall x (Wrenching(x) -> Burned(x)) -> therefore Burned(fraser) Burned(fraser) and forall x (Burned(x) -> Eucaryotic(x)) -> therefore Eucaryotic(fraser)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Willamina is teen. Ron is keyed. Bobbie is not jailed. Helga is not aired. All brute things are benumbed. If something is keyed then it is purplish. Furry, keyed things are aired. If something is purplish and not jailed then it is aired. All purplish things are brute. If Helga is not jailed then Helga is not teen. Ron is not benumbed.", "logic": "\nTeen(willamina)\nKeyed(ron)\nnot Jailed(bobbie)\nnot Aired(helga)\nforall x (Brute(x) -> Benumbed(x))\nforall x (Keyed(x) -> Purplish(x))\nforall x (Benumbed(x) and Keyed(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Purplish(x) and not Jailed(x) -> Aired(x))\nforall x (Purplish(x) -> Brute(x))\nnot Jailed(helga) -> not Teen(helga)\n\nnot Benumbed(ron)\n\nKeyed(ron) and forall x (Keyed(x) -> Purplish(x)) -> therefore Purplish(ron) Purplish(ron) and forall x (Purplish(x) -> Brute(x)) -> therefore Brute(ron) Brute(ron) and forall x (Brute(x) -> Benumbed(x)) -> therefore Benumbed(ron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Maryjane is back. Leona is stumpy. Alameda is not aldehydic. Richie is not shona. All ursine things are saurian. If something is stumpy then it is grouped. Furry, stumpy things are shona. If something is grouped and not aldehydic then it is shona. All grouped things are ursine. If Richie is not aldehydic then Richie is not back. Richie is not grouped.", "logic": "\nBack(maryjane)\nStumpy(leona)\nnot Aldehydic(alameda)\nnot Shona(richie)\nforall x (Ursine(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Stumpy(x) -> Grouped(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) and Stumpy(x) -> Shona(x))\nforall x (Grouped(x) and not Aldehydic(x) -> Shona(x))\nforall x (Grouped(x) -> Ursine(x))\nnot Aldehydic(richie) -> not Back(richie)\n\nnot Grouped(richie)\n\nforall x (Stumpy(x) -> Grouped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Annamari is pycnotic. Melany is livelong. Tiena is not gimbaled. Amalita is not clammy. All infectious things are coenobitic. If something is livelong then it is galilean. Furry, livelong things are clammy. If something is galilean and not gimbaled then it is clammy. All galilean things are infectious. If Amalita is not gimbaled then Amalita is not pycnotic. Tiena is coenobitic.", "logic": "\nPycnotic(annamari)\nLivelong(melany)\nnot Gimbaled(tiena)\nnot Clammy(amalita)\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) -> Galilean(x))\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) and Livelong(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) and not Gimbaled(x) -> Clammy(x))\nforall x (Galilean(x) -> Infectious(x))\nnot Gimbaled(amalita) -> not Pycnotic(amalita)\n\nCoenobitic(tiena)\n\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Coenobitic(x)) <- forall x (Galilean(x) -> Infectious(x)) <- forall x (Livelong(x) -> Galilean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Dot is vaporish. Jermain is concerted. Lindie is not lunatic. Bartlett is not shed. All roundabout things are motorised. If something is concerted then it is upended. Furry, concerted things are shed. If something is upended and not lunatic then it is shed. All upended things are roundabout. If Bartlett is not lunatic then Bartlett is not vaporish. Bartlett is not motorised.", "logic": "\nVaporish(dot)\nConcerted(jermain)\nnot Lunatic(lindie)\nnot Shed(bartlett)\nforall x (Roundabout(x) -> Motorised(x))\nforall x (Concerted(x) -> Upended(x))\nforall x (Motorised(x) and Concerted(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Upended(x) and not Lunatic(x) -> Shed(x))\nforall x (Upended(x) -> Roundabout(x))\nnot Lunatic(bartlett) -> not Vaporish(bartlett)\n\nnot Motorised(bartlett)\n\nforall x (Roundabout(x) -> Motorised(x)) <- forall x (Upended(x) -> Roundabout(x)) <- forall x (Concerted(x) -> Upended(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Robenia is catchy. Bennett is moneran. Francois is not mediocre. Iolande is not squalling. All southward things are techy. If something is moneran then it is amnestic. Furry, moneran things are squalling. If something is amnestic and not mediocre then it is squalling. All amnestic things are southward. If Iolande is not mediocre then Iolande is not catchy. Robenia is squalling.", "logic": "\nCatchy(robenia)\nMoneran(bennett)\nnot Mediocre(francois)\nnot Squalling(iolande)\nforall x (Southward(x) -> Techy(x))\nforall x (Moneran(x) -> Amnestic(x))\nforall x (Techy(x) and Moneran(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Amnestic(x) and not Mediocre(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Amnestic(x) -> Southward(x))\nnot Mediocre(iolande) -> not Catchy(iolande)\n\nSqualling(robenia)\n\nforall x (Techy(x) and Moneran(x) -> Squalling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Yolanda is uneventful. Dody is trenchant. Llewellyn is not frigid. Rianon is not weakened. All chafflike things are aghast. If something is trenchant then it is idealized. Furry, trenchant things are weakened. If something is idealized and not frigid then it is weakened. All idealized things are chafflike. If Rianon is not frigid then Rianon is not uneventful. Dody is not uneventful.", "logic": "\nUneventful(yolanda)\nTrenchant(dody)\nnot Frigid(llewellyn)\nnot Weakened(rianon)\nforall x (Chafflike(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Trenchant(x) -> Idealized(x))\nforall x (Aghast(x) and Trenchant(x) -> Weakened(x))\nforall x (Idealized(x) and not Frigid(x) -> Weakened(x))\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Chafflike(x))\nnot Frigid(rianon) -> not Uneventful(rianon)\n\nnot Uneventful(dody)\n\nnot Uneventful(dody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Leandra is studied. Monah is dear. Karl is not herbal. Doretta is not pregnant. All unstylish things are galled. If something is dear then it is sixpenny. Furry, dear things are pregnant. If something is sixpenny and not herbal then it is pregnant. All sixpenny things are unstylish. If Doretta is not herbal then Doretta is not studied. Karl is studied.", "logic": "\nStudied(leandra)\nDear(monah)\nnot Herbal(karl)\nnot Pregnant(doretta)\nforall x (Unstylish(x) -> Galled(x))\nforall x (Dear(x) -> Sixpenny(x))\nforall x (Galled(x) and Dear(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Sixpenny(x) and not Herbal(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Sixpenny(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nnot Herbal(doretta) -> not Studied(doretta)\n\nStudied(karl)\n\nStudied(karl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Melisande is scheduled. Beale is aureate. Natka is not clonal. Giraldo is not sleeved. All idealized things are circadian. If something is aureate then it is sincere. Furry, aureate things are sleeved. If something is sincere and not clonal then it is sleeved. All sincere things are idealized. If Giraldo is not clonal then Giraldo is not scheduled. Giraldo is not scheduled.", "logic": "\nScheduled(melisande)\nAureate(beale)\nnot Clonal(natka)\nnot Sleeved(giraldo)\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> Circadian(x))\nforall x (Aureate(x) -> Sincere(x))\nforall x (Circadian(x) and Aureate(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Sincere(x) and not Clonal(x) -> Sleeved(x))\nforall x (Sincere(x) -> Idealized(x))\nnot Clonal(giraldo) -> not Scheduled(giraldo)\n\nnot Scheduled(giraldo)\n\nnot Scheduled(giraldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Rufus is dynastic. Shela is tactful. Estele is not exothermic. Sonja is not hazy. All agreed things are glutted. If something is tactful then it is bromidic. Furry, tactful things are hazy. If something is bromidic and not exothermic then it is hazy. All bromidic things are agreed. If Sonja is not exothermic then Sonja is not dynastic. Shela is exothermic.", "logic": "\nDynastic(rufus)\nTactful(shela)\nnot Exothermic(estele)\nnot Hazy(sonja)\nforall x (Agreed(x) -> Glutted(x))\nforall x (Tactful(x) -> Bromidic(x))\nforall x (Glutted(x) and Tactful(x) -> Hazy(x))\nforall x (Bromidic(x) and not Exothermic(x) -> Hazy(x))\nforall x (Bromidic(x) -> Agreed(x))\nnot Exothermic(sonja) -> not Dynastic(sonja)\n\nExothermic(shela)\n\nExothermic(shela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-172"} {"premises": "Nadeen is fictile. Nadeen is squarish. Nadeen is redemptive. Nadeen is focused. Ishmael is subsidised. Ishmael is fictile. Ishmael is squarish. Ishmael is unmelodic. Ishmael is tentacular. Hedi is subsidised. Hedi is fictile. Hedi is squarish. Hedi is unmelodic. Hedi is redemptive. Hedi is tentacular. If Hedi is tentacular then Hedi is redemptive. Kind, redemptive people are tentacular. Smart, tentacular people are redemptive. Ishmael is subsidised.", "logic": "\nFictile(nadeen)\nSquarish(nadeen)\nRedemptive(nadeen)\nFocused(nadeen)\nSubsidised(ishmael)\nFictile(ishmael)\nSquarish(ishmael)\nUnmelodic(ishmael)\nTentacular(ishmael)\nSubsidised(hedi)\nFictile(hedi)\nSquarish(hedi)\nUnmelodic(hedi)\nRedemptive(hedi)\nTentacular(hedi)\nTentacular(hedi) -> Redemptive(hedi)\nforall x (Squarish(x) and Redemptive(x) -> Tentacular(x))\nforall x (Focused(x) and Tentacular(x) -> Redemptive(x))\n\nSubsidised(ishmael)\n\ntherefore Subsidised(ishmael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2873"} {"premises": "Yalonda is starchy. Yalonda is understood. Yalonda is evasive. Yalonda is submersed. Jennie is strident. Jennie is starchy. Jennie is understood. Jennie is styleless. Jennie is haired. Abbey is strident. Abbey is starchy. Abbey is understood. Abbey is styleless. Abbey is evasive. Abbey is haired. If Abbey is haired then Abbey is evasive. Kind, evasive people are haired. Smart, haired people are evasive. Abbey is not haired.", "logic": "\nStarchy(yalonda)\nUnderstood(yalonda)\nEvasive(yalonda)\nSubmersed(yalonda)\nStrident(jennie)\nStarchy(jennie)\nUnderstood(jennie)\nStyleless(jennie)\nHaired(jennie)\nStrident(abbey)\nStarchy(abbey)\nUnderstood(abbey)\nStyleless(abbey)\nEvasive(abbey)\nHaired(abbey)\nHaired(abbey) -> Evasive(abbey)\nforall x (Understood(x) and Evasive(x) -> Haired(x))\nforall x (Submersed(x) and Haired(x) -> Evasive(x))\n\nnot Haired(abbey)\n\ntherefore Haired(abbey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2873"} {"premises": "Ellie is aphanitic. Ellie is sanguinary. Ellie is esophageal. Ellie is antiknock. Denny is knockdown. Denny is aphanitic. Denny is sanguinary. Denny is bulbar. Denny is solar. Shirlee is knockdown. Shirlee is aphanitic. Shirlee is sanguinary. Shirlee is bulbar. Shirlee is esophageal. Shirlee is solar. If Shirlee is solar then Shirlee is esophageal. Kind, esophageal people are solar. Smart, solar people are esophageal. Denny is not esophageal.", "logic": "\nAphanitic(ellie)\nSanguinary(ellie)\nEsophageal(ellie)\nAntiknock(ellie)\nKnockdown(denny)\nAphanitic(denny)\nSanguinary(denny)\nBulbar(denny)\nSolar(denny)\nKnockdown(shirlee)\nAphanitic(shirlee)\nSanguinary(shirlee)\nBulbar(shirlee)\nEsophageal(shirlee)\nSolar(shirlee)\nSolar(shirlee) -> Esophageal(shirlee)\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) and Esophageal(x) -> Solar(x))\nforall x (Antiknock(x) and Solar(x) -> Esophageal(x))\n\nnot Esophageal(denny)\n\nforall x (Antiknock(x) and Solar(x) -> Esophageal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2873"} {"premises": "Rozalin is defiled. Rozalin is fordable. Rozalin is leftover. Rozalin is apivorous. Carey is salubrious. Carey is defiled. Carey is fordable. Carey is dicey. Carey is paraplegic. Ilyssa is salubrious. Ilyssa is defiled. Ilyssa is fordable. Ilyssa is dicey. Ilyssa is leftover. Ilyssa is paraplegic. If Ilyssa is paraplegic then Ilyssa is leftover. Kind, leftover people are paraplegic. Smart, paraplegic people are leftover. Ilyssa is apivorous.", "logic": "\nDefiled(rozalin)\nFordable(rozalin)\nLeftover(rozalin)\nApivorous(rozalin)\nSalubrious(carey)\nDefiled(carey)\nFordable(carey)\nDicey(carey)\nParaplegic(carey)\nSalubrious(ilyssa)\nDefiled(ilyssa)\nFordable(ilyssa)\nDicey(ilyssa)\nLeftover(ilyssa)\nParaplegic(ilyssa)\nParaplegic(ilyssa) -> Leftover(ilyssa)\nforall x (Fordable(x) and Leftover(x) -> Paraplegic(x))\nforall x (Apivorous(x) and Paraplegic(x) -> Leftover(x))\n\nApivorous(ilyssa)\n\nApivorous(ilyssa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2873"} {"premises": "Stella is younger. Stella is glycogenic. Stella is needled. Quiet, glycogenic things are historied. If something is courageous then it is woozy. Blue things are sauteed. If something is glycogenic and younger then it is historied. If something is historied then it is courageous. All historied things are needled. If something is courageous and younger then it is glycogenic. Nice, woozy things are needled. Stella is younger.", "logic": "\nYounger(stella)\nGlycogenic(stella)\nNeedled(stella)\nforall x (Needled(x) and Glycogenic(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Courageous(x) -> Woozy(x))\nforall x (Younger(x) -> Sauteed(x))\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) and Younger(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Historied(x) -> Courageous(x))\nforall x (Historied(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Courageous(x) and Younger(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) and Woozy(x) -> Needled(x))\n\nYounger(stella)\n\ntherefore Younger(stella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Gregory is wintery. Gregory is palatine. Gregory is affixed. Quiet, palatine things are purging. If something is assaultive then it is congenital. Blue things are lymphatic. If something is palatine and wintery then it is purging. If something is purging then it is assaultive. All purging things are affixed. If something is assaultive and wintery then it is palatine. Nice, congenital things are affixed. Gregory is not palatine.", "logic": "\nWintery(gregory)\nPalatine(gregory)\nAffixed(gregory)\nforall x (Affixed(x) and Palatine(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Assaultive(x) -> Congenital(x))\nforall x (Wintery(x) -> Lymphatic(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) and Wintery(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Assaultive(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Affixed(x))\nforall x (Assaultive(x) and Wintery(x) -> Palatine(x))\nforall x (Palatine(x) and Congenital(x) -> Affixed(x))\n\nnot Palatine(gregory)\n\ntherefore Palatine(gregory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Berte is auditive. Berte is divalent. Berte is aftermost. Quiet, divalent things are exhaustive. If something is insolvent then it is french. Blue things are bolshevik. If something is divalent and auditive then it is exhaustive. If something is exhaustive then it is insolvent. All exhaustive things are aftermost. If something is insolvent and auditive then it is divalent. Nice, french things are aftermost. Berte is exhaustive.", "logic": "\nAuditive(berte)\nDivalent(berte)\nAftermost(berte)\nforall x (Aftermost(x) and Divalent(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\nforall x (Insolvent(x) -> French(x))\nforall x (Auditive(x) -> Bolshevik(x))\nforall x (Divalent(x) and Auditive(x) -> Exhaustive(x))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Insolvent(x))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) -> Aftermost(x))\nforall x (Insolvent(x) and Auditive(x) -> Divalent(x))\nforall x (Divalent(x) and French(x) -> Aftermost(x))\n\nExhaustive(berte)\n\nDivalent(berte) and Auditive(berte) and forall x (Divalent(x) and Auditive(x) -> Exhaustive(x)) -> therefore Exhaustive(berte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Isabelita is bivalved. Isabelita is grumose. Isabelita is centroidal. Quiet, grumose things are northward. If something is jutting then it is captivated. Blue things are unhatched. If something is grumose and bivalved then it is northward. If something is northward then it is jutting. All northward things are centroidal. If something is jutting and bivalved then it is grumose. Nice, captivated things are centroidal. Isabelita is not northward.", "logic": "\nBivalved(isabelita)\nGrumose(isabelita)\nCentroidal(isabelita)\nforall x (Centroidal(x) and Grumose(x) -> Northward(x))\nforall x (Jutting(x) -> Captivated(x))\nforall x (Bivalved(x) -> Unhatched(x))\nforall x (Grumose(x) and Bivalved(x) -> Northward(x))\nforall x (Northward(x) -> Jutting(x))\nforall x (Northward(x) -> Centroidal(x))\nforall x (Jutting(x) and Bivalved(x) -> Grumose(x))\nforall x (Grumose(x) and Captivated(x) -> Centroidal(x))\n\nnot Northward(isabelita)\n\nGrumose(isabelita) and Bivalved(isabelita) and forall x (Grumose(x) and Bivalved(x) -> Northward(x)) -> therefore Northward(isabelita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Valencia is unusual. Valencia is unassuming. Valencia is silvan. Quiet, unassuming things are dozy. If something is flavorous then it is gruelling. Blue things are nipponese. If something is unassuming and unusual then it is dozy. If something is dozy then it is flavorous. All dozy things are silvan. If something is flavorous and unusual then it is unassuming. Nice, gruelling things are silvan. Valencia is flavorous.", "logic": "\nUnusual(valencia)\nUnassuming(valencia)\nSilvan(valencia)\nforall x (Silvan(x) and Unassuming(x) -> Dozy(x))\nforall x (Flavorous(x) -> Gruelling(x))\nforall x (Unusual(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Unassuming(x) and Unusual(x) -> Dozy(x))\nforall x (Dozy(x) -> Flavorous(x))\nforall x (Dozy(x) -> Silvan(x))\nforall x (Flavorous(x) and Unusual(x) -> Unassuming(x))\nforall x (Unassuming(x) and Gruelling(x) -> Silvan(x))\n\nFlavorous(valencia)\n\nUnassuming(valencia) and Unusual(valencia) and forall x (Unassuming(x) and Unusual(x) -> Dozy(x)) -> therefore Dozy(valencia) Dozy(valencia) and forall x (Dozy(x) -> Flavorous(x)) -> therefore Flavorous(valencia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Renaldo is netted. Renaldo is sadducean. Renaldo is monacan. Quiet, sadducean things are dandyish. If something is chaldee then it is spick. Blue things are unbuttoned. If something is sadducean and netted then it is dandyish. If something is dandyish then it is chaldee. All dandyish things are monacan. If something is chaldee and netted then it is sadducean. Nice, spick things are monacan. Renaldo is not chaldee.", "logic": "\nNetted(renaldo)\nSadducean(renaldo)\nMonacan(renaldo)\nforall x (Monacan(x) and Sadducean(x) -> Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) -> Spick(x))\nforall x (Netted(x) -> Unbuttoned(x))\nforall x (Sadducean(x) and Netted(x) -> Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Dandyish(x) -> Chaldee(x))\nforall x (Dandyish(x) -> Monacan(x))\nforall x (Chaldee(x) and Netted(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Sadducean(x) and Spick(x) -> Monacan(x))\n\nnot Chaldee(renaldo)\n\nSadducean(renaldo) and Netted(renaldo) and forall x (Sadducean(x) and Netted(x) -> Dandyish(x)) -> therefore Dandyish(renaldo) Dandyish(renaldo) and forall x (Dandyish(x) -> Chaldee(x)) -> therefore Chaldee(renaldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Delly is indelicate. Delly is binominal. Delly is like. Quiet, binominal things are dandyish. If something is cambodian then it is stationary. Blue things are reticent. If something is binominal and indelicate then it is dandyish. If something is dandyish then it is cambodian. All dandyish things are like. If something is cambodian and indelicate then it is binominal. Nice, stationary things are like. Delly is stationary.", "logic": "\nIndelicate(delly)\nBinominal(delly)\nLike(delly)\nforall x (Like(x) and Binominal(x) -> Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) -> Stationary(x))\nforall x (Indelicate(x) -> Reticent(x))\nforall x (Binominal(x) and Indelicate(x) -> Dandyish(x))\nforall x (Dandyish(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Dandyish(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and Indelicate(x) -> Binominal(x))\nforall x (Binominal(x) and Stationary(x) -> Like(x))\n\nStationary(delly)\n\nBinominal(delly) and Indelicate(delly) and forall x (Binominal(x) and Indelicate(x) -> Dandyish(x)) -> therefore Dandyish(delly) Dandyish(delly) and forall x (Dandyish(x) -> Cambodian(x)) -> therefore Cambodian(delly) Cambodian(delly) and forall x (Cambodian(x) -> Stationary(x)) -> therefore Stationary(delly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Luella is punctured. Luella is three. Luella is hypnotised. Quiet, three things are unenclosed. If something is spacy then it is scratchy. Blue things are unmoving. If something is three and punctured then it is unenclosed. If something is unenclosed then it is spacy. All unenclosed things are hypnotised. If something is spacy and punctured then it is three. Nice, scratchy things are hypnotised. Luella is not scratchy.", "logic": "\nPunctured(luella)\nThree(luella)\nHypnotised(luella)\nforall x (Hypnotised(x) and Three(x) -> Unenclosed(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> Scratchy(x))\nforall x (Punctured(x) -> Unmoving(x))\nforall x (Three(x) and Punctured(x) -> Unenclosed(x))\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) -> Spacy(x))\nforall x (Unenclosed(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) and Punctured(x) -> Three(x))\nforall x (Three(x) and Scratchy(x) -> Hypnotised(x))\n\nnot Scratchy(luella)\n\nThree(luella) and Punctured(luella) and forall x (Three(x) and Punctured(x) -> Unenclosed(x)) -> therefore Unenclosed(luella) Unenclosed(luella) and forall x (Unenclosed(x) -> Spacy(x)) -> therefore Spacy(luella) Spacy(luella) and forall x (Spacy(x) -> Scratchy(x)) -> therefore Scratchy(luella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-822"} {"premises": "Becka is hottish. Brad is briny. If someone is painted then they are insolent. If someone is actuarial and not hottish then they are insolent. If someone is wilful then they are not insolent. All painted people are insolent. If someone is briny and heathlike then they are painted. All wilful people are not painted. Green people are painted. All insolent people are not actuarial. Becka is hottish.", "logic": "\nHottish(becka)\nBriny(brad)\nforall x (Painted(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Actuarial(x) and not Hottish(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Wilful(x) -> not Insolent(x))\nforall x (Painted(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Briny(x) and Heathlike(x) -> Painted(x))\nforall x (Wilful(x) -> not Painted(x))\nforall x (Hottish(x) -> Painted(x))\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> not Actuarial(x))\n\nHottish(becka)\n\ntherefore Hottish(becka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Urbanus is pictorial. Toni is anaplastic. If someone is cinematic then they are aguish. If someone is ariose and not pictorial then they are aguish. If someone is glary then they are not aguish. All cinematic people are aguish. If someone is anaplastic and inhibited then they are cinematic. All glary people are not cinematic. Green people are cinematic. All aguish people are not ariose. Toni is not anaplastic.", "logic": "\nPictorial(urbanus)\nAnaplastic(toni)\nforall x (Cinematic(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Ariose(x) and not Pictorial(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Glary(x) -> not Aguish(x))\nforall x (Cinematic(x) -> Aguish(x))\nforall x (Anaplastic(x) and Inhibited(x) -> Cinematic(x))\nforall x (Glary(x) -> not Cinematic(x))\nforall x (Pictorial(x) -> Cinematic(x))\nforall x (Aguish(x) -> not Ariose(x))\n\nnot Anaplastic(toni)\n\ntherefore Anaplastic(toni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Deeann is abdicable. Lisandra is phoney. If someone is undigested then they are motherless. If someone is unstuck and not abdicable then they are motherless. If someone is mozartean then they are not motherless. All undigested people are motherless. If someone is phoney and hidebound then they are undigested. All mozartean people are not undigested. Green people are undigested. All motherless people are not unstuck. Deeann is undigested.", "logic": "\nAbdicable(deeann)\nPhoney(lisandra)\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Unstuck(x) and not Abdicable(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) -> not Motherless(x))\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Phoney(x) and Hidebound(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) -> not Undigested(x))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Motherless(x) -> not Unstuck(x))\n\nUndigested(deeann)\n\nAbdicable(deeann) and forall x (Abdicable(x) -> Undigested(x)) -> therefore Undigested(deeann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Ventura is vegetative. Adam is verdant. If someone is avuncular then they are delinquent. If someone is visored and not vegetative then they are delinquent. If someone is woolly then they are not delinquent. All avuncular people are delinquent. If someone is verdant and toeless then they are avuncular. All woolly people are not avuncular. Green people are avuncular. All delinquent people are not visored. Ventura is not avuncular.", "logic": "\nVegetative(ventura)\nVerdant(adam)\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Visored(x) and not Vegetative(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> not Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Avuncular(x) -> Delinquent(x))\nforall x (Verdant(x) and Toeless(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> not Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Vegetative(x) -> Avuncular(x))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> not Visored(x))\n\nnot Avuncular(ventura)\n\nVegetative(ventura) and forall x (Vegetative(x) -> Avuncular(x)) -> therefore Avuncular(ventura)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Tharen is spacy. Tannie is shrubby. If someone is peppy then they are assaultive. If someone is ferned and not spacy then they are assaultive. If someone is parametric then they are not assaultive. All peppy people are assaultive. If someone is shrubby and authorized then they are peppy. All parametric people are not peppy. Green people are peppy. All assaultive people are not ferned. Tharen is assaultive.", "logic": "\nSpacy(tharen)\nShrubby(tannie)\nforall x (Peppy(x) -> Assaultive(x))\nforall x (Ferned(x) and not Spacy(x) -> Assaultive(x))\nforall x (Parametric(x) -> not Assaultive(x))\nforall x (Peppy(x) -> Assaultive(x))\nforall x (Shrubby(x) and Authorized(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Parametric(x) -> not Peppy(x))\nforall x (Spacy(x) -> Peppy(x))\nforall x (Assaultive(x) -> not Ferned(x))\n\nAssaultive(tharen)\n\nSpacy(tharen) and forall x (Spacy(x) -> Peppy(x)) -> therefore Peppy(tharen) Peppy(tharen) and forall x (Peppy(x) -> Assaultive(x)) -> therefore Assaultive(tharen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Stanwood is favorite. Rudiger is clownlike. If someone is homeric then they are motherless. If someone is imbricated and not favorite then they are motherless. If someone is fattened then they are not motherless. All homeric people are motherless. If someone is clownlike and outrigged then they are homeric. All fattened people are not homeric. Green people are homeric. All motherless people are not imbricated. Stanwood is not motherless.", "logic": "\nFavorite(stanwood)\nClownlike(rudiger)\nforall x (Homeric(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Imbricated(x) and not Favorite(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Fattened(x) -> not Motherless(x))\nforall x (Homeric(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Clownlike(x) and Outrigged(x) -> Homeric(x))\nforall x (Fattened(x) -> not Homeric(x))\nforall x (Favorite(x) -> Homeric(x))\nforall x (Motherless(x) -> not Imbricated(x))\n\nnot Motherless(stanwood)\n\nFavorite(stanwood) and forall x (Favorite(x) -> Homeric(x)) -> therefore Homeric(stanwood) Homeric(stanwood) and forall x (Homeric(x) -> Motherless(x)) -> therefore Motherless(stanwood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Eda is climatic. Bethany is shattering. If someone is canopied then they are amnesic. If someone is andorran and not climatic then they are amnesic. If someone is turbid then they are not amnesic. All canopied people are amnesic. If someone is shattering and secure then they are canopied. All turbid people are not canopied. Green people are canopied. All amnesic people are not andorran. Eda is not andorran.", "logic": "\nClimatic(eda)\nShattering(bethany)\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Andorran(x) and not Climatic(x) -> Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> not Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Canopied(x) -> Amnesic(x))\nforall x (Shattering(x) and Secure(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> not Canopied(x))\nforall x (Climatic(x) -> Canopied(x))\nforall x (Amnesic(x) -> not Andorran(x))\n\nnot Andorran(eda)\n\nClimatic(eda) and forall x (Climatic(x) -> Canopied(x)) -> therefore Canopied(eda) Canopied(eda) and forall x (Canopied(x) -> Amnesic(x)) -> therefore Amnesic(eda) Amnesic(eda) and forall x (Amnesic(x) -> not Andorran(x)) -> therefore not Andorran(eda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Sonni is beige. Isabella is shallow. If someone is liliaceous then they are thorny. If someone is unanswered and not beige then they are thorny. If someone is hurried then they are not thorny. All liliaceous people are thorny. If someone is shallow and percipient then they are liliaceous. All hurried people are not liliaceous. Green people are liliaceous. All thorny people are not unanswered. Sonni is unanswered.", "logic": "\nBeige(sonni)\nShallow(isabella)\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) -> Thorny(x))\nforall x (Unanswered(x) and not Beige(x) -> Thorny(x))\nforall x (Hurried(x) -> not Thorny(x))\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) -> Thorny(x))\nforall x (Shallow(x) and Percipient(x) -> Liliaceous(x))\nforall x (Hurried(x) -> not Liliaceous(x))\nforall x (Beige(x) -> Liliaceous(x))\nforall x (Thorny(x) -> not Unanswered(x))\n\nUnanswered(sonni)\n\nBeige(sonni) and forall x (Beige(x) -> Liliaceous(x)) -> therefore Liliaceous(sonni) Liliaceous(sonni) and forall x (Liliaceous(x) -> Thorny(x)) -> therefore Thorny(sonni) Thorny(sonni) and forall x (Thorny(x) -> not Unanswered(x)) -> therefore not Unanswered(sonni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Onida is anaerobic. Mallory is graduate. If someone is zigzag then they are elderly. If someone is surreal and not anaerobic then they are elderly. If someone is seamy then they are not elderly. All zigzag people are elderly. If someone is graduate and pursuant then they are zigzag. All seamy people are not zigzag. Green people are zigzag. All elderly people are not surreal. Mallory is not zigzag.", "logic": "\nAnaerobic(onida)\nGraduate(mallory)\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> Elderly(x))\nforall x (Surreal(x) and not Anaerobic(x) -> Elderly(x))\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> not Elderly(x))\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> Elderly(x))\nforall x (Graduate(x) and Pursuant(x) -> Zigzag(x))\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> not Zigzag(x))\nforall x (Anaerobic(x) -> Zigzag(x))\nforall x (Elderly(x) -> not Surreal(x))\n\nnot Zigzag(mallory)\n\nforall x (Graduate(x) and Pursuant(x) -> Zigzag(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Kathlene is delinquent. Witty is fantastic. If someone is unlocated then they are exorbitant. If someone is darkling and not delinquent then they are exorbitant. If someone is bruising then they are not exorbitant. All unlocated people are exorbitant. If someone is fantastic and inexorable then they are unlocated. All bruising people are not unlocated. Green people are unlocated. All exorbitant people are not darkling. Witty is exorbitant.", "logic": "\nDelinquent(kathlene)\nFantastic(witty)\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Darkling(x) and not Delinquent(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> not Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Fantastic(x) and Inexorable(x) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> not Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Delinquent(x) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> not Darkling(x))\n\nExorbitant(witty)\n\nforall x (Unlocated(x) -> Exorbitant(x)) <- forall x (Fantastic(x) and Inexorable(x) -> Unlocated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Berenice is agnatic. Adolpho is insured. If someone is rheumy then they are unwrinkled. If someone is unreached and not agnatic then they are unwrinkled. If someone is sagittate then they are not unwrinkled. All rheumy people are unwrinkled. If someone is insured and centered then they are rheumy. All sagittate people are not rheumy. Green people are rheumy. All unwrinkled people are not unreached. Adolpho is not unreached.", "logic": "\nAgnatic(berenice)\nInsured(adolpho)\nforall x (Rheumy(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and not Agnatic(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Sagittate(x) -> not Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Rheumy(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Insured(x) and Centered(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Sagittate(x) -> not Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Agnatic(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> not Unreached(x))\n\nnot Unreached(adolpho)\n\nnot Unreached(adolpho) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Deana is regulation. Maddi is impeccable. If someone is fizzy then they are throaty. If someone is ungainly and not regulation then they are throaty. If someone is modified then they are not throaty. All fizzy people are throaty. If someone is impeccable and gingery then they are fizzy. All modified people are not fizzy. Green people are fizzy. All throaty people are not ungainly. Deana is modified.", "logic": "\nRegulation(deana)\nImpeccable(maddi)\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Throaty(x))\nforall x (Ungainly(x) and not Regulation(x) -> Throaty(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) -> not Throaty(x))\nforall x (Fizzy(x) -> Throaty(x))\nforall x (Impeccable(x) and Gingery(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) -> not Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> Fizzy(x))\nforall x (Throaty(x) -> not Ungainly(x))\n\nModified(deana)\n\nModified(deana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Mathilda is unmined. Zonda is jade. If someone is shimmery then they are topped. If someone is swollen and not unmined then they are topped. If someone is illegible then they are not topped. All shimmery people are topped. If someone is jade and icelandic then they are shimmery. All illegible people are not shimmery. Green people are shimmery. All topped people are not swollen. Mathilda is not icelandic.", "logic": "\nUnmined(mathilda)\nJade(zonda)\nforall x (Shimmery(x) -> Topped(x))\nforall x (Swollen(x) and not Unmined(x) -> Topped(x))\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> not Topped(x))\nforall x (Shimmery(x) -> Topped(x))\nforall x (Jade(x) and Icelandic(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> not Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Unmined(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Topped(x) -> not Swollen(x))\n\nnot Icelandic(mathilda)\n\nnot Icelandic(mathilda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Gae is bacillary. Cherry is preferred. If someone is illiberal then they are apropos. If someone is keyless and not bacillary then they are apropos. If someone is antenatal then they are not apropos. All illiberal people are apropos. If someone is preferred and discrete then they are illiberal. All antenatal people are not illiberal. Green people are illiberal. All apropos people are not keyless. Cherry is discrete.", "logic": "\nBacillary(gae)\nPreferred(cherry)\nforall x (Illiberal(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Keyless(x) and not Bacillary(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Antenatal(x) -> not Apropos(x))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) -> Apropos(x))\nforall x (Preferred(x) and Discrete(x) -> Illiberal(x))\nforall x (Antenatal(x) -> not Illiberal(x))\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Illiberal(x))\nforall x (Apropos(x) -> not Keyless(x))\n\nDiscrete(cherry)\n\nDiscrete(cherry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Lolita is unreduced. Tommie is addible. If someone is underway then they are gauche. If someone is damnatory and not unreduced then they are gauche. If someone is carpal then they are not gauche. All underway people are gauche. If someone is addible and jazzy then they are underway. All carpal people are not underway. Green people are underway. All gauche people are not damnatory. Lolita is not addible.", "logic": "\nUnreduced(lolita)\nAddible(tommie)\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Damnatory(x) and not Unreduced(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> not Gauche(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Addible(x) and Jazzy(x) -> Underway(x))\nforall x (Carpal(x) -> not Underway(x))\nforall x (Unreduced(x) -> Underway(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> not Damnatory(x))\n\nnot Addible(lolita)\n\nnot Addible(lolita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Odella is irascible. Sher is topped. If someone is clement then they are foreboding. If someone is smoothbore and not irascible then they are foreboding. If someone is pictured then they are not foreboding. All clement people are foreboding. If someone is topped and hibernal then they are clement. All pictured people are not clement. Green people are clement. All foreboding people are not smoothbore. Sher is pictured.", "logic": "\nIrascible(odella)\nTopped(sher)\nforall x (Clement(x) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) and not Irascible(x) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Pictured(x) -> not Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Clement(x) -> Foreboding(x))\nforall x (Topped(x) and Hibernal(x) -> Clement(x))\nforall x (Pictured(x) -> not Clement(x))\nforall x (Irascible(x) -> Clement(x))\nforall x (Foreboding(x) -> not Smoothbore(x))\n\nPictured(sher)\n\nPictured(sher) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1593"} {"premises": "Lisabeth is achenial. Lisabeth is bilobated. Lisabeth is vatic. Lisabeth is execrable. Lisabeth is lovely. Lisabeth is not shimmery. Lisabeth is jewelled. Ramona is achenial. Ramona is bilobated. Ramona is vatic. Ramona is execrable. Ramona is lovely. Ramona is jewelled. Stephine is bilobated. Stephine is shimmery. Stephine is jewelled. If Ramona is execrable and Ramona is vatic then Ramona is achenial. If something is lovely then it is jewelled. All jewelled, shimmery things are lovely. All achenial, lovely things are vatic. If something is lovely and shimmery then it is achenial. If Stephine is execrable and Stephine is not shimmery then Stephine is not jewelled. Lisabeth is not shimmery.", "logic": "\nAchenial(lisabeth)\nBilobated(lisabeth)\nVatic(lisabeth)\nExecrable(lisabeth)\nLovely(lisabeth)\nnot Shimmery(lisabeth)\nJewelled(lisabeth)\nAchenial(ramona)\nBilobated(ramona)\nVatic(ramona)\nExecrable(ramona)\nLovely(ramona)\nJewelled(ramona)\nBilobated(stephine)\nShimmery(stephine)\nJewelled(stephine)\nExecrable(ramona) and Vatic(ramona) -> Achenial(ramona)\nforall x (Lovely(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nforall x (Jewelled(x) and Shimmery(x) -> Lovely(x))\nforall x (Achenial(x) and Lovely(x) -> Vatic(x))\nforall x (Lovely(x) and Shimmery(x) -> Achenial(x))\nExecrable(stephine) and not Shimmery(stephine) -> not Jewelled(stephine)\n\nnot Shimmery(lisabeth)\n\ntherefore not Shimmery(lisabeth)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Halimeda is nativist. Halimeda is stuporous. Halimeda is ismaili. Halimeda is arthritic. Halimeda is czarist. Halimeda is not palsied. Halimeda is unintended. Sonya is nativist. Sonya is stuporous. Sonya is ismaili. Sonya is arthritic. Sonya is czarist. Sonya is unintended. Rita is stuporous. Rita is palsied. Rita is unintended. If Sonya is arthritic and Sonya is ismaili then Sonya is nativist. If something is czarist then it is unintended. All unintended, palsied things are czarist. All nativist, czarist things are ismaili. If something is czarist and palsied then it is nativist. If Rita is arthritic and Rita is not palsied then Rita is not unintended. Halimeda is not nativist.", "logic": "\nNativist(halimeda)\nStuporous(halimeda)\nIsmaili(halimeda)\nArthritic(halimeda)\nCzarist(halimeda)\nnot Palsied(halimeda)\nUnintended(halimeda)\nNativist(sonya)\nStuporous(sonya)\nIsmaili(sonya)\nArthritic(sonya)\nCzarist(sonya)\nUnintended(sonya)\nStuporous(rita)\nPalsied(rita)\nUnintended(rita)\nArthritic(sonya) and Ismaili(sonya) -> Nativist(sonya)\nforall x (Czarist(x) -> Unintended(x))\nforall x (Unintended(x) and Palsied(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Nativist(x) and Czarist(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nforall x (Czarist(x) and Palsied(x) -> Nativist(x))\nArthritic(rita) and not Palsied(rita) -> not Unintended(rita)\n\nnot Nativist(halimeda)\n\ntherefore Nativist(halimeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Rosie is upended. Rosie is melodious. Rosie is mithraic. Rosie is subaquatic. Rosie is caroline. Rosie is not cyclonic. Rosie is each. Ariel is upended. Ariel is melodious. Ariel is mithraic. Ariel is subaquatic. Ariel is caroline. Ariel is each. Rey is melodious. Rey is cyclonic. Rey is each. If Ariel is subaquatic and Ariel is mithraic then Ariel is upended. If something is caroline then it is each. All each, cyclonic things are caroline. All upended, caroline things are mithraic. If something is caroline and cyclonic then it is upended. If Rey is subaquatic and Rey is not cyclonic then Rey is not each. Rey is caroline.", "logic": "\nUpended(rosie)\nMelodious(rosie)\nMithraic(rosie)\nSubaquatic(rosie)\nCaroline(rosie)\nnot Cyclonic(rosie)\nEach(rosie)\nUpended(ariel)\nMelodious(ariel)\nMithraic(ariel)\nSubaquatic(ariel)\nCaroline(ariel)\nEach(ariel)\nMelodious(rey)\nCyclonic(rey)\nEach(rey)\nSubaquatic(ariel) and Mithraic(ariel) -> Upended(ariel)\nforall x (Caroline(x) -> Each(x))\nforall x (Each(x) and Cyclonic(x) -> Caroline(x))\nforall x (Upended(x) and Caroline(x) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Caroline(x) and Cyclonic(x) -> Upended(x))\nSubaquatic(rey) and not Cyclonic(rey) -> not Each(rey)\n\nCaroline(rey)\n\nEach(rey) and Cyclonic(rey) and forall x (Each(x) and Cyclonic(x) -> Caroline(x)) -> therefore Caroline(rey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Jami is expired. Jami is roughdried. Jami is blooming. Jami is extramural. Jami is cathectic. Jami is not relaxant. Jami is punishable. Schuyler is expired. Schuyler is roughdried. Schuyler is blooming. Schuyler is extramural. Schuyler is cathectic. Schuyler is punishable. Odille is roughdried. Odille is relaxant. Odille is punishable. If Schuyler is extramural and Schuyler is blooming then Schuyler is expired. If something is cathectic then it is punishable. All punishable, relaxant things are cathectic. All expired, cathectic things are blooming. If something is cathectic and relaxant then it is expired. If Odille is extramural and Odille is not relaxant then Odille is not punishable. Odille is not cathectic.", "logic": "\nExpired(jami)\nRoughdried(jami)\nBlooming(jami)\nExtramural(jami)\nCathectic(jami)\nnot Relaxant(jami)\nPunishable(jami)\nExpired(schuyler)\nRoughdried(schuyler)\nBlooming(schuyler)\nExtramural(schuyler)\nCathectic(schuyler)\nPunishable(schuyler)\nRoughdried(odille)\nRelaxant(odille)\nPunishable(odille)\nExtramural(schuyler) and Blooming(schuyler) -> Expired(schuyler)\nforall x (Cathectic(x) -> Punishable(x))\nforall x (Punishable(x) and Relaxant(x) -> Cathectic(x))\nforall x (Expired(x) and Cathectic(x) -> Blooming(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) and Relaxant(x) -> Expired(x))\nExtramural(odille) and not Relaxant(odille) -> not Punishable(odille)\n\nnot Cathectic(odille)\n\nPunishable(odille) and Relaxant(odille) and forall x (Punishable(x) and Relaxant(x) -> Cathectic(x)) -> therefore Cathectic(odille)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Reinhard is modifiable. Reinhard is brummagem. Reinhard is febrile. Reinhard is impassive. Reinhard is catholic. Reinhard is not hanoverian. Reinhard is wormlike. Lynsey is modifiable. Lynsey is brummagem. Lynsey is febrile. Lynsey is impassive. Lynsey is catholic. Lynsey is wormlike. Ilka is brummagem. Ilka is hanoverian. Ilka is wormlike. If Lynsey is impassive and Lynsey is febrile then Lynsey is modifiable. If something is catholic then it is wormlike. All wormlike, hanoverian things are catholic. All modifiable, catholic things are febrile. If something is catholic and hanoverian then it is modifiable. If Ilka is impassive and Ilka is not hanoverian then Ilka is not wormlike. Ilka is modifiable.", "logic": "\nModifiable(reinhard)\nBrummagem(reinhard)\nFebrile(reinhard)\nImpassive(reinhard)\nCatholic(reinhard)\nnot Hanoverian(reinhard)\nWormlike(reinhard)\nModifiable(lynsey)\nBrummagem(lynsey)\nFebrile(lynsey)\nImpassive(lynsey)\nCatholic(lynsey)\nWormlike(lynsey)\nBrummagem(ilka)\nHanoverian(ilka)\nWormlike(ilka)\nImpassive(lynsey) and Febrile(lynsey) -> Modifiable(lynsey)\nforall x (Catholic(x) -> Wormlike(x))\nforall x (Wormlike(x) and Hanoverian(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Modifiable(x) and Catholic(x) -> Febrile(x))\nforall x (Catholic(x) and Hanoverian(x) -> Modifiable(x))\nImpassive(ilka) and not Hanoverian(ilka) -> not Wormlike(ilka)\n\nModifiable(ilka)\n\nWormlike(ilka) and Hanoverian(ilka) and forall x (Wormlike(x) and Hanoverian(x) -> Catholic(x)) -> therefore Catholic(ilka) Catholic(ilka) and Hanoverian(ilka) and forall x (Catholic(x) and Hanoverian(x) -> Modifiable(x)) -> therefore Modifiable(ilka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Nerita is tainted. Nerita is adhesive. Nerita is bellbottom. Nerita is accrued. Nerita is withering. Nerita is not seductive. Nerita is undesigned. Muriel is tainted. Muriel is adhesive. Muriel is bellbottom. Muriel is accrued. Muriel is withering. Muriel is undesigned. Lenard is adhesive. Lenard is seductive. Lenard is undesigned. If Muriel is accrued and Muriel is bellbottom then Muriel is tainted. If something is withering then it is undesigned. All undesigned, seductive things are withering. All tainted, withering things are bellbottom. If something is withering and seductive then it is tainted. If Lenard is accrued and Lenard is not seductive then Lenard is not undesigned. Lenard is not tainted.", "logic": "\nTainted(nerita)\nAdhesive(nerita)\nBellbottom(nerita)\nAccrued(nerita)\nWithering(nerita)\nnot Seductive(nerita)\nUndesigned(nerita)\nTainted(muriel)\nAdhesive(muriel)\nBellbottom(muriel)\nAccrued(muriel)\nWithering(muriel)\nUndesigned(muriel)\nAdhesive(lenard)\nSeductive(lenard)\nUndesigned(lenard)\nAccrued(muriel) and Bellbottom(muriel) -> Tainted(muriel)\nforall x (Withering(x) -> Undesigned(x))\nforall x (Undesigned(x) and Seductive(x) -> Withering(x))\nforall x (Tainted(x) and Withering(x) -> Bellbottom(x))\nforall x (Withering(x) and Seductive(x) -> Tainted(x))\nAccrued(lenard) and not Seductive(lenard) -> not Undesigned(lenard)\n\nnot Tainted(lenard)\n\nUndesigned(lenard) and Seductive(lenard) and forall x (Undesigned(x) and Seductive(x) -> Withering(x)) -> therefore Withering(lenard) Withering(lenard) and Seductive(lenard) and forall x (Withering(x) and Seductive(x) -> Tainted(x)) -> therefore Tainted(lenard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Zacherie is glued. Zacherie is lacerate. Zacherie is hooved. Zacherie is stealthy. Zacherie is coherent. Zacherie is not meagre. Zacherie is visaged. Robbi is glued. Robbi is lacerate. Robbi is hooved. Robbi is stealthy. Robbi is coherent. Robbi is visaged. Nathaniel is lacerate. Nathaniel is meagre. Nathaniel is visaged. If Robbi is stealthy and Robbi is hooved then Robbi is glued. If something is coherent then it is visaged. All visaged, meagre things are coherent. All glued, coherent things are hooved. If something is coherent and meagre then it is glued. If Nathaniel is stealthy and Nathaniel is not meagre then Nathaniel is not visaged. Nathaniel is hooved.", "logic": "\nGlued(zacherie)\nLacerate(zacherie)\nHooved(zacherie)\nStealthy(zacherie)\nCoherent(zacherie)\nnot Meagre(zacherie)\nVisaged(zacherie)\nGlued(robbi)\nLacerate(robbi)\nHooved(robbi)\nStealthy(robbi)\nCoherent(robbi)\nVisaged(robbi)\nLacerate(nathaniel)\nMeagre(nathaniel)\nVisaged(nathaniel)\nStealthy(robbi) and Hooved(robbi) -> Glued(robbi)\nforall x (Coherent(x) -> Visaged(x))\nforall x (Visaged(x) and Meagre(x) -> Coherent(x))\nforall x (Glued(x) and Coherent(x) -> Hooved(x))\nforall x (Coherent(x) and Meagre(x) -> Glued(x))\nStealthy(nathaniel) and not Meagre(nathaniel) -> not Visaged(nathaniel)\n\nHooved(nathaniel)\n\nVisaged(nathaniel) and Meagre(nathaniel) and forall x (Visaged(x) and Meagre(x) -> Coherent(x)) -> therefore Coherent(nathaniel) Coherent(nathaniel) and Meagre(nathaniel) and forall x (Coherent(x) and Meagre(x) -> Glued(x)) -> therefore Glued(nathaniel) Visaged(nathaniel) and Meagre(nathaniel) and forall x (Visaged(x) and Meagre(x) -> Coherent(x)) -> therefore Coherent(nathaniel) Glued(nathaniel) and Coherent(nathaniel) and forall x (Glued(x) and Coherent(x) -> Hooved(x)) -> therefore Hooved(nathaniel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Flinn is sensed. Flinn is granted. Flinn is cramped. Flinn is slashed. Flinn is anoestrous. Flinn is not cochlear. Flinn is hypethral. Wyndham is sensed. Wyndham is granted. Wyndham is cramped. Wyndham is slashed. Wyndham is anoestrous. Wyndham is hypethral. Konrad is granted. Konrad is cochlear. Konrad is hypethral. If Wyndham is slashed and Wyndham is cramped then Wyndham is sensed. If something is anoestrous then it is hypethral. All hypethral, cochlear things are anoestrous. All sensed, anoestrous things are cramped. If something is anoestrous and cochlear then it is sensed. If Konrad is slashed and Konrad is not cochlear then Konrad is not hypethral. Konrad is not cramped.", "logic": "\nSensed(flinn)\nGranted(flinn)\nCramped(flinn)\nSlashed(flinn)\nAnoestrous(flinn)\nnot Cochlear(flinn)\nHypethral(flinn)\nSensed(wyndham)\nGranted(wyndham)\nCramped(wyndham)\nSlashed(wyndham)\nAnoestrous(wyndham)\nHypethral(wyndham)\nGranted(konrad)\nCochlear(konrad)\nHypethral(konrad)\nSlashed(wyndham) and Cramped(wyndham) -> Sensed(wyndham)\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) -> Hypethral(x))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) and Cochlear(x) -> Anoestrous(x))\nforall x (Sensed(x) and Anoestrous(x) -> Cramped(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and Cochlear(x) -> Sensed(x))\nSlashed(konrad) and not Cochlear(konrad) -> not Hypethral(konrad)\n\nnot Cramped(konrad)\n\nHypethral(konrad) and Cochlear(konrad) and forall x (Hypethral(x) and Cochlear(x) -> Anoestrous(x)) -> therefore Anoestrous(konrad) Anoestrous(konrad) and Cochlear(konrad) and forall x (Anoestrous(x) and Cochlear(x) -> Sensed(x)) -> therefore Sensed(konrad) Hypethral(konrad) and Cochlear(konrad) and forall x (Hypethral(x) and Cochlear(x) -> Anoestrous(x)) -> therefore Anoestrous(konrad) Sensed(konrad) and Anoestrous(konrad) and forall x (Sensed(x) and Anoestrous(x) -> Cramped(x)) -> therefore Cramped(konrad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Elie is unassured. Elie is backstairs. Elie is premarital. Elie is sedate. Elie is hellish. Elie is not expectant. Elie is sisyphean. Hortensia is unassured. Hortensia is backstairs. Hortensia is premarital. Hortensia is sedate. Hortensia is hellish. Hortensia is sisyphean. Pepe is backstairs. Pepe is expectant. Pepe is sisyphean. If Hortensia is sedate and Hortensia is premarital then Hortensia is unassured. If something is hellish then it is sisyphean. All sisyphean, expectant things are hellish. All unassured, hellish things are premarital. If something is hellish and expectant then it is unassured. If Pepe is sedate and Pepe is not expectant then Pepe is not sisyphean. Pepe is not sedate.", "logic": "\nUnassured(elie)\nBackstairs(elie)\nPremarital(elie)\nSedate(elie)\nHellish(elie)\nnot Expectant(elie)\nSisyphean(elie)\nUnassured(hortensia)\nBackstairs(hortensia)\nPremarital(hortensia)\nSedate(hortensia)\nHellish(hortensia)\nSisyphean(hortensia)\nBackstairs(pepe)\nExpectant(pepe)\nSisyphean(pepe)\nSedate(hortensia) and Premarital(hortensia) -> Unassured(hortensia)\nforall x (Hellish(x) -> Sisyphean(x))\nforall x (Sisyphean(x) and Expectant(x) -> Hellish(x))\nforall x (Unassured(x) and Hellish(x) -> Premarital(x))\nforall x (Hellish(x) and Expectant(x) -> Unassured(x))\nSedate(pepe) and not Expectant(pepe) -> not Sisyphean(pepe)\n\nnot Sedate(pepe)\n\nnot Sedate(pepe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "Rebecka is unsated. Rebecka is sprawling. Rebecka is shifty. Rebecka is dominant. Rebecka is motherless. Rebecka is not gallican. Rebecka is unified. Griswold is unsated. Griswold is sprawling. Griswold is shifty. Griswold is dominant. Griswold is motherless. Griswold is unified. Audrie is sprawling. Audrie is gallican. Audrie is unified. If Griswold is dominant and Griswold is shifty then Griswold is unsated. If something is motherless then it is unified. All unified, gallican things are motherless. All unsated, motherless things are shifty. If something is motherless and gallican then it is unsated. If Audrie is dominant and Audrie is not gallican then Audrie is not unified. Griswold is gallican.", "logic": "\nUnsated(rebecka)\nSprawling(rebecka)\nShifty(rebecka)\nDominant(rebecka)\nMotherless(rebecka)\nnot Gallican(rebecka)\nUnified(rebecka)\nUnsated(griswold)\nSprawling(griswold)\nShifty(griswold)\nDominant(griswold)\nMotherless(griswold)\nUnified(griswold)\nSprawling(audrie)\nGallican(audrie)\nUnified(audrie)\nDominant(griswold) and Shifty(griswold) -> Unsated(griswold)\nforall x (Motherless(x) -> Unified(x))\nforall x (Unified(x) and Gallican(x) -> Motherless(x))\nforall x (Unsated(x) and Motherless(x) -> Shifty(x))\nforall x (Motherless(x) and Gallican(x) -> Unsated(x))\nDominant(audrie) and not Gallican(audrie) -> not Unified(audrie)\n\nGallican(griswold)\n\nGallican(griswold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-678"} {"premises": "The galen petrify the dinah. The galen mistake the arabella. The arabella corbel the galen. The arabella mistake the galen. The osmund petrify the dinah. The osmund is grilled. The osmund mistake the galen. The osmund mistake the arabella. The dinah petrify the arabella. The dinah is amphibian. If someone corbel the osmund and the osmund is grilled then the osmund corbel the arabella. If someone corbel the galen then the galen is grilled. If someone is awheel then they visit the galen. If someone corbel the osmund and they are amphibian then the osmund corbel the arabella. If someone is monstrous and amphibian then they like the osmund. If someone is unipolar and they visit the dinah then the dinah petrify the arabella. The dinah petrify the arabella.", "logic": "\nPetrify(galen, dinah)\nMistake(galen, arabella)\nCorbel(arabella, galen)\nMistake(arabella, galen)\nPetrify(osmund, dinah)\nGrilled(osmund)\nMistake(osmund, galen)\nMistake(osmund, arabella)\nPetrify(dinah, arabella)\nAmphibian(dinah)\nforall x (Corbel(x, osmund) and Grilled(osmund) -> Corbel(osmund, arabella))\nforall x (Corbel(x, galen) -> Grilled(galen))\nforall x (Awheel(x) -> Mistake(x, galen))\nforall x (Corbel(x, osmund) and Amphibian(x) -> Corbel(osmund, arabella))\nforall x (Monstrous(x) and Amphibian(x) -> Corbel(x, osmund))\nforall x (Unipolar(x) and Mistake(x, dinah) -> Petrify(dinah, arabella))\n\nPetrify(dinah, arabella)\n\ntherefore Petrify(dinah, arabella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1486"} {"premises": "The rivy appear the lacey. The rivy steam the elizabeth. The elizabeth invalidate the rivy. The elizabeth steam the rivy. The amelie appear the lacey. The amelie is whippy. The amelie steam the rivy. The amelie steam the elizabeth. The lacey appear the elizabeth. The lacey is false. If someone invalidate the amelie and the amelie is whippy then the amelie invalidate the elizabeth. If someone invalidate the rivy then the rivy is whippy. If someone is arsenious then they visit the rivy. If someone invalidate the amelie and they are false then the amelie invalidate the elizabeth. If someone is arabian and false then they like the amelie. If someone is insipid and they visit the lacey then the lacey appear the elizabeth. The amelie does not visit the rivy.", "logic": "\nAppear(rivy, lacey)\nSteam(rivy, elizabeth)\nInvalidate(elizabeth, rivy)\nSteam(elizabeth, rivy)\nAppear(amelie, lacey)\nWhippy(amelie)\nSteam(amelie, rivy)\nSteam(amelie, elizabeth)\nAppear(lacey, elizabeth)\nFalse(lacey)\nforall x (Invalidate(x, amelie) and Whippy(amelie) -> Invalidate(amelie, elizabeth))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, rivy) -> Whippy(rivy))\nforall x (Arsenious(x) -> Steam(x, rivy))\nforall x (Invalidate(x, amelie) and False(x) -> Invalidate(amelie, elizabeth))\nforall x (Arabian(x) and False(x) -> Invalidate(x, amelie))\nforall x (Insipid(x) and Steam(x, lacey) -> Appear(lacey, elizabeth))\n\nnot Steam(amelie, rivy)\n\ntherefore Steam(amelie, rivy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1486"} {"premises": "The ernst militate the fabrianne. The ernst varnish the gilberto. The gilberto collide the ernst. The gilberto varnish the ernst. The zarla militate the fabrianne. The zarla is pyramidic. The zarla varnish the ernst. The zarla varnish the gilberto. The fabrianne militate the gilberto. The fabrianne is agonised. If someone collide the zarla and the zarla is pyramidic then the zarla collide the gilberto. If someone collide the ernst then the ernst is pyramidic. If someone is gingery then they visit the ernst. If someone collide the zarla and they are agonised then the zarla collide the gilberto. If someone is ensuing and agonised then they like the zarla. If someone is mannish and they visit the fabrianne then the fabrianne militate the gilberto. The ernst does not like the zarla.", "logic": "\nMilitate(ernst, fabrianne)\nVarnish(ernst, gilberto)\nCollide(gilberto, ernst)\nVarnish(gilberto, ernst)\nMilitate(zarla, fabrianne)\nPyramidic(zarla)\nVarnish(zarla, ernst)\nVarnish(zarla, gilberto)\nMilitate(fabrianne, gilberto)\nAgonised(fabrianne)\nforall x (Collide(x, zarla) and Pyramidic(zarla) -> Collide(zarla, gilberto))\nforall x (Collide(x, ernst) -> Pyramidic(ernst))\nforall x (Gingery(x) -> Varnish(x, ernst))\nforall x (Collide(x, zarla) and Agonised(x) -> Collide(zarla, gilberto))\nforall x (Ensuing(x) and Agonised(x) -> Collide(x, zarla))\nforall x (Mannish(x) and Varnish(x, fabrianne) -> Militate(fabrianne, gilberto))\n\nnot Collide(ernst, zarla)\n\nforall x (Ensuing(x) and Agonised(x) -> Collide(x, zarla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1486"} {"premises": "The valaree osculate the griswold. The valaree captain the ginni. The ginni beseech the valaree. The ginni captain the valaree. The lainey osculate the griswold. The lainey is vapourific. The lainey captain the valaree. The lainey captain the ginni. The griswold osculate the ginni. The griswold is ilxxx. If someone beseech the lainey and the lainey is vapourific then the lainey beseech the ginni. If someone beseech the valaree then the valaree is vapourific. If someone is rational then they visit the valaree. If someone beseech the lainey and they are ilxxx then the lainey beseech the ginni. If someone is fervent and ilxxx then they like the lainey. If someone is unlettered and they visit the griswold then the griswold osculate the ginni. The valaree osculate the valaree.", "logic": "\nOsculate(valaree, griswold)\nCaptain(valaree, ginni)\nBeseech(ginni, valaree)\nCaptain(ginni, valaree)\nOsculate(lainey, griswold)\nVapourific(lainey)\nCaptain(lainey, valaree)\nCaptain(lainey, ginni)\nOsculate(griswold, ginni)\nIlxxx(griswold)\nforall x (Beseech(x, lainey) and Vapourific(lainey) -> Beseech(lainey, ginni))\nforall x (Beseech(x, valaree) -> Vapourific(valaree))\nforall x (Rational(x) -> Captain(x, valaree))\nforall x (Beseech(x, lainey) and Ilxxx(x) -> Beseech(lainey, ginni))\nforall x (Fervent(x) and Ilxxx(x) -> Beseech(x, lainey))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) and Captain(x, griswold) -> Osculate(griswold, ginni))\n\nOsculate(valaree, valaree)\n\nOsculate(valaree, valaree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1486"} {"premises": "The aggi does not eat the dasi. The aggi begin the bruno. The aggi is lentiform. The aggi is not entozoan. The aggi phase the dasi. The aggi depict the barth. The dasi is pitiful. The dasi phase the barth. The dasi depict the barth. The bruno does not eat the aggi. The bruno begin the dasi. The bruno is not truant. The bruno depict the dasi. The bruno depict the barth. The barth is apodal. The barth depict the dasi. If the dasi begin the bruno and the dasi does not eat the barth then the barth is truant. If something begin the dasi and the dasi is lentiform then it phase the aggi. If something phase the barth and it does not see the dasi then the barth begin the bruno. The aggi begin the bruno.", "logic": "\nnot Begin(aggi, dasi)\nBegin(aggi, bruno)\nLentiform(aggi)\nnot Entozoan(aggi)\nPhase(aggi, dasi)\nDepict(aggi, barth)\nPitiful(dasi)\nPhase(dasi, barth)\nDepict(dasi, barth)\nnot Begin(bruno, aggi)\nBegin(bruno, dasi)\nnot Truant(bruno)\nDepict(bruno, dasi)\nDepict(bruno, barth)\nApodal(barth)\nDepict(barth, dasi)\nBegin(dasi, bruno) and not Begin(dasi, barth) -> Truant(barth)\nforall x (Begin(x, dasi) and Lentiform(dasi) -> Phase(x, aggi))\nforall x (Phase(x, barth) and not Phase(x, dasi) -> Begin(barth, bruno))\n\nBegin(aggi, bruno)\n\ntherefore Begin(aggi, bruno)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1082"} {"premises": "The dyanna does not eat the ave. The dyanna counteract the merwin. The dyanna is comfy. The dyanna is not urgent. The dyanna amalgamate the ave. The dyanna bump the lissie. The ave is deferent. The ave amalgamate the lissie. The ave bump the lissie. The merwin does not eat the dyanna. The merwin counteract the ave. The merwin is not vicious. The merwin bump the ave. The merwin bump the lissie. The lissie is sissyish. The lissie bump the ave. If the ave counteract the merwin and the ave does not eat the lissie then the lissie is vicious. If something counteract the ave and the ave is comfy then it amalgamate the dyanna. If something amalgamate the lissie and it does not see the ave then the lissie counteract the merwin. The dyanna does not see the ave.", "logic": "\nnot Counteract(dyanna, ave)\nCounteract(dyanna, merwin)\nComfy(dyanna)\nnot Urgent(dyanna)\nAmalgamate(dyanna, ave)\nBump(dyanna, lissie)\nDeferent(ave)\nAmalgamate(ave, lissie)\nBump(ave, lissie)\nnot Counteract(merwin, dyanna)\nCounteract(merwin, ave)\nnot Vicious(merwin)\nBump(merwin, ave)\nBump(merwin, lissie)\nSissyish(lissie)\nBump(lissie, ave)\nCounteract(ave, merwin) and not Counteract(ave, lissie) -> Vicious(lissie)\nforall x (Counteract(x, ave) and Comfy(ave) -> Amalgamate(x, dyanna))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x, lissie) and not Amalgamate(x, ave) -> Counteract(lissie, merwin))\n\nnot Amalgamate(dyanna, ave)\n\ntherefore Amalgamate(dyanna, ave)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1082"} {"premises": "The brice does not eat the lizette. The brice bombard the elmore. The brice is operose. The brice is not ceilinged. The brice federalize the lizette. The brice thank the neal. The lizette is squinty. The lizette federalize the neal. The lizette thank the neal. The elmore does not eat the brice. The elmore bombard the lizette. The elmore is not mealy. The elmore thank the lizette. The elmore thank the neal. The neal is alate. The neal thank the lizette. If the lizette bombard the elmore and the lizette does not eat the neal then the neal is mealy. If something bombard the lizette and the lizette is operose then it federalize the brice. If something federalize the neal and it does not see the lizette then the neal bombard the elmore. The neal does not see the brice.", "logic": "\nnot Bombard(brice, lizette)\nBombard(brice, elmore)\nOperose(brice)\nnot Ceilinged(brice)\nFederalize(brice, lizette)\nThank(brice, neal)\nSquinty(lizette)\nFederalize(lizette, neal)\nThank(lizette, neal)\nnot Bombard(elmore, brice)\nBombard(elmore, lizette)\nnot Mealy(elmore)\nThank(elmore, lizette)\nThank(elmore, neal)\nAlate(neal)\nThank(neal, lizette)\nBombard(lizette, elmore) and not Bombard(lizette, neal) -> Mealy(neal)\nforall x (Bombard(x, lizette) and Operose(lizette) -> Federalize(x, brice))\nforall x (Federalize(x, neal) and not Federalize(x, lizette) -> Bombard(neal, elmore))\n\nnot Federalize(neal, brice)\n\nforall x (Bombard(x, lizette) and Operose(lizette) -> Federalize(x, brice)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1082"} {"premises": "The win does not eat the carolie. The win genuflect the cathy. The win is untilled. The win is not prevenient. The win perch the carolie. The win shadowbox the theresita. The carolie is grassless. The carolie perch the theresita. The carolie shadowbox the theresita. The cathy does not eat the win. The cathy genuflect the carolie. The cathy is not rejected. The cathy shadowbox the carolie. The cathy shadowbox the theresita. The theresita is speckled. The theresita shadowbox the carolie. If the carolie genuflect the cathy and the carolie does not eat the theresita then the theresita is rejected. If something genuflect the carolie and the carolie is untilled then it perch the win. If something perch the theresita and it does not see the carolie then the theresita genuflect the cathy. The carolie shadowbox the carolie.", "logic": "\nnot Genuflect(win, carolie)\nGenuflect(win, cathy)\nUntilled(win)\nnot Prevenient(win)\nPerch(win, carolie)\nShadowbox(win, theresita)\nGrassless(carolie)\nPerch(carolie, theresita)\nShadowbox(carolie, theresita)\nnot Genuflect(cathy, win)\nGenuflect(cathy, carolie)\nnot Rejected(cathy)\nShadowbox(cathy, carolie)\nShadowbox(cathy, theresita)\nSpeckled(theresita)\nShadowbox(theresita, carolie)\nGenuflect(carolie, cathy) and not Genuflect(carolie, theresita) -> Rejected(theresita)\nforall x (Genuflect(x, carolie) and Untilled(carolie) -> Perch(x, win))\nforall x (Perch(x, theresita) and not Perch(x, carolie) -> Genuflect(theresita, cathy))\n\nShadowbox(carolie, carolie)\n\nShadowbox(carolie, carolie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1082"} {"premises": "The sanford is not vinegarish. The sanford is unfearing. The sanford shade the isabelle. The sanford shade the canada. The sanford subtilise the isabelle. The sanford subtilise the canada. The sanford does not visit the canada. The isabelle is urethral. The isabelle is not unfearing. The isabelle is not peaceable. The isabelle shade the sanford. The canada is vinegarish. The canada is peaceable. The canada shade the isabelle. The canada does not see the sanford. The canada funk the sanford. If someone funk the isabelle then the isabelle subtilise the canada. If the sanford funk the canada and the isabelle does not like the sanford then the sanford does not like the canada. If someone funk the canada and they see the canada then they do not like the isabelle. If the sanford subtilise the isabelle and the sanford is unfearing then the sanford is not autocratic. If someone subtilise the sanford then the sanford does not see the canada. If someone funk the sanford then the sanford shade the isabelle. The canada shade the isabelle.", "logic": "\nnot Vinegarish(sanford)\nUnfearing(sanford)\nShade(sanford, isabelle)\nShade(sanford, canada)\nSubtilise(sanford, isabelle)\nSubtilise(sanford, canada)\nnot Funk(sanford, canada)\nUrethral(isabelle)\nnot Unfearing(isabelle)\nnot Peaceable(isabelle)\nShade(isabelle, sanford)\nVinegarish(canada)\nPeaceable(canada)\nShade(canada, isabelle)\nnot Subtilise(canada, sanford)\nFunk(canada, sanford)\nforall x (Funk(x, isabelle) -> Subtilise(isabelle, canada))\nFunk(sanford, canada) and not Shade(isabelle, sanford) -> not Shade(sanford, canada)\nforall x (Funk(x, canada) and Subtilise(x, canada) -> not Shade(x, isabelle))\nSubtilise(sanford, isabelle) and Unfearing(sanford) -> not Autocratic(sanford)\nforall x (Subtilise(x, sanford) -> not Subtilise(sanford, canada))\nforall x (Funk(x, sanford) -> Shade(sanford, isabelle))\n\nShade(canada, isabelle)\n\ntherefore Shade(canada, isabelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The brigitte is not trancelike. The brigitte is calculous. The brigitte sedate the dirk. The brigitte sedate the eula. The brigitte loaf the dirk. The brigitte loaf the eula. The brigitte does not visit the eula. The dirk is beaked. The dirk is not calculous. The dirk is not pugnacious. The dirk sedate the brigitte. The eula is trancelike. The eula is pugnacious. The eula sedate the dirk. The eula does not see the brigitte. The eula tease the brigitte. If someone tease the dirk then the dirk loaf the eula. If the brigitte tease the eula and the dirk does not like the brigitte then the brigitte does not like the eula. If someone tease the eula and they see the eula then they do not like the dirk. If the brigitte loaf the dirk and the brigitte is calculous then the brigitte is not squalling. If someone loaf the brigitte then the brigitte does not see the eula. If someone tease the brigitte then the brigitte sedate the dirk. The brigitte tease the eula.", "logic": "\nnot Trancelike(brigitte)\nCalculous(brigitte)\nSedate(brigitte, dirk)\nSedate(brigitte, eula)\nLoaf(brigitte, dirk)\nLoaf(brigitte, eula)\nnot Tease(brigitte, eula)\nBeaked(dirk)\nnot Calculous(dirk)\nnot Pugnacious(dirk)\nSedate(dirk, brigitte)\nTrancelike(eula)\nPugnacious(eula)\nSedate(eula, dirk)\nnot Loaf(eula, brigitte)\nTease(eula, brigitte)\nforall x (Tease(x, dirk) -> Loaf(dirk, eula))\nTease(brigitte, eula) and not Sedate(dirk, brigitte) -> not Sedate(brigitte, eula)\nforall x (Tease(x, eula) and Loaf(x, eula) -> not Sedate(x, dirk))\nLoaf(brigitte, dirk) and Calculous(brigitte) -> not Squalling(brigitte)\nforall x (Loaf(x, brigitte) -> not Loaf(brigitte, eula))\nforall x (Tease(x, brigitte) -> Sedate(brigitte, dirk))\n\nTease(brigitte, eula)\n\ntherefore not Tease(brigitte, eula)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The ozzy is not rawboned. The ozzy is redbrick. The ozzy objectify the devi. The ozzy objectify the alidia. The ozzy ruminate the devi. The ozzy ruminate the alidia. The ozzy does not visit the alidia. The devi is hatless. The devi is not redbrick. The devi is not nonexempt. The devi objectify the ozzy. The alidia is rawboned. The alidia is nonexempt. The alidia objectify the devi. The alidia does not see the ozzy. The alidia rely the ozzy. If someone rely the devi then the devi ruminate the alidia. If the ozzy rely the alidia and the devi does not like the ozzy then the ozzy does not like the alidia. If someone rely the alidia and they see the alidia then they do not like the devi. If the ozzy ruminate the devi and the ozzy is redbrick then the ozzy is not plutonic. If someone ruminate the ozzy then the ozzy does not see the alidia. If someone rely the ozzy then the ozzy objectify the devi. The ozzy is not plutonic.", "logic": "\nnot Rawboned(ozzy)\nRedbrick(ozzy)\nObjectify(ozzy, devi)\nObjectify(ozzy, alidia)\nRuminate(ozzy, devi)\nRuminate(ozzy, alidia)\nnot Rely(ozzy, alidia)\nHatless(devi)\nnot Redbrick(devi)\nnot Nonexempt(devi)\nObjectify(devi, ozzy)\nRawboned(alidia)\nNonexempt(alidia)\nObjectify(alidia, devi)\nnot Ruminate(alidia, ozzy)\nRely(alidia, ozzy)\nforall x (Rely(x, devi) -> Ruminate(devi, alidia))\nRely(ozzy, alidia) and not Objectify(devi, ozzy) -> not Objectify(ozzy, alidia)\nforall x (Rely(x, alidia) and Ruminate(x, alidia) -> not Objectify(x, devi))\nRuminate(ozzy, devi) and Redbrick(ozzy) -> not Plutonic(ozzy)\nforall x (Ruminate(x, ozzy) -> not Ruminate(ozzy, alidia))\nforall x (Rely(x, ozzy) -> Objectify(ozzy, devi))\n\nnot Plutonic(ozzy)\n\nRuminate(ozzy, devi) and Redbrick(ozzy) and Ruminate(ozzy, devi) and Redbrick(ozzy) -> not Plutonic(ozzy) -> therefore not Plutonic(ozzy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The keil is not biserrate. The keil is eighteen. The keil furcate the carolan. The keil furcate the jacklin. The keil wallop the carolan. The keil wallop the jacklin. The keil does not visit the jacklin. The carolan is andean. The carolan is not eighteen. The carolan is not endoergic. The carolan furcate the keil. The jacklin is biserrate. The jacklin is endoergic. The jacklin furcate the carolan. The jacklin does not see the keil. The jacklin eavesdrop the keil. If someone eavesdrop the carolan then the carolan wallop the jacklin. If the keil eavesdrop the jacklin and the carolan does not like the keil then the keil does not like the jacklin. If someone eavesdrop the jacklin and they see the jacklin then they do not like the carolan. If the keil wallop the carolan and the keil is eighteen then the keil is not unsalable. If someone wallop the keil then the keil does not see the jacklin. If someone eavesdrop the keil then the keil furcate the carolan. The keil is unsalable.", "logic": "\nnot Biserrate(keil)\nEighteen(keil)\nFurcate(keil, carolan)\nFurcate(keil, jacklin)\nWallop(keil, carolan)\nWallop(keil, jacklin)\nnot Eavesdrop(keil, jacklin)\nAndean(carolan)\nnot Eighteen(carolan)\nnot Endoergic(carolan)\nFurcate(carolan, keil)\nBiserrate(jacklin)\nEndoergic(jacklin)\nFurcate(jacklin, carolan)\nnot Wallop(jacklin, keil)\nEavesdrop(jacklin, keil)\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, carolan) -> Wallop(carolan, jacklin))\nEavesdrop(keil, jacklin) and not Furcate(carolan, keil) -> not Furcate(keil, jacklin)\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, jacklin) and Wallop(x, jacklin) -> not Furcate(x, carolan))\nWallop(keil, carolan) and Eighteen(keil) -> not Unsalable(keil)\nforall x (Wallop(x, keil) -> not Wallop(keil, jacklin))\nforall x (Eavesdrop(x, keil) -> Furcate(keil, carolan))\n\nUnsalable(keil)\n\nWallop(keil, carolan) and Eighteen(keil) and Wallop(keil, carolan) and Eighteen(keil) -> not Unsalable(keil) -> therefore not Unsalable(keil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The fernanda is not dynamic. The fernanda is heretical. The fernanda raise the carolan. The fernanda raise the mabelle. The fernanda inhibit the carolan. The fernanda inhibit the mabelle. The fernanda does not visit the mabelle. The carolan is earthlike. The carolan is not heretical. The carolan is not tireless. The carolan raise the fernanda. The mabelle is dynamic. The mabelle is tireless. The mabelle raise the carolan. The mabelle does not see the fernanda. The mabelle predict the fernanda. If someone predict the carolan then the carolan inhibit the mabelle. If the fernanda predict the mabelle and the carolan does not like the fernanda then the fernanda does not like the mabelle. If someone predict the mabelle and they see the mabelle then they do not like the carolan. If the fernanda inhibit the carolan and the fernanda is heretical then the fernanda is not latin. If someone inhibit the fernanda then the fernanda does not see the mabelle. If someone predict the fernanda then the fernanda raise the carolan. The carolan does not see the mabelle.", "logic": "\nnot Dynamic(fernanda)\nHeretical(fernanda)\nRaise(fernanda, carolan)\nRaise(fernanda, mabelle)\nInhibit(fernanda, carolan)\nInhibit(fernanda, mabelle)\nnot Predict(fernanda, mabelle)\nEarthlike(carolan)\nnot Heretical(carolan)\nnot Tireless(carolan)\nRaise(carolan, fernanda)\nDynamic(mabelle)\nTireless(mabelle)\nRaise(mabelle, carolan)\nnot Inhibit(mabelle, fernanda)\nPredict(mabelle, fernanda)\nforall x (Predict(x, carolan) -> Inhibit(carolan, mabelle))\nPredict(fernanda, mabelle) and not Raise(carolan, fernanda) -> not Raise(fernanda, mabelle)\nforall x (Predict(x, mabelle) and Inhibit(x, mabelle) -> not Raise(x, carolan))\nInhibit(fernanda, carolan) and Heretical(fernanda) -> not Latin(fernanda)\nforall x (Inhibit(x, fernanda) -> not Inhibit(fernanda, mabelle))\nforall x (Predict(x, fernanda) -> Raise(fernanda, carolan))\n\nnot Inhibit(carolan, mabelle)\n\nforall x (Predict(x, carolan) -> Inhibit(carolan, mabelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The tressa is not fierce. The tressa is coastwise. The tressa castigate the beulah. The tressa castigate the karylin. The tressa misuse the beulah. The tressa misuse the karylin. The tressa does not visit the karylin. The beulah is unsent. The beulah is not coastwise. The beulah is not aplacental. The beulah castigate the tressa. The karylin is fierce. The karylin is aplacental. The karylin castigate the beulah. The karylin does not see the tressa. The karylin homologise the tressa. If someone homologise the beulah then the beulah misuse the karylin. If the tressa homologise the karylin and the beulah does not like the tressa then the tressa does not like the karylin. If someone homologise the karylin and they see the karylin then they do not like the beulah. If the tressa misuse the beulah and the tressa is coastwise then the tressa is not eradicable. If someone misuse the tressa then the tressa does not see the karylin. If someone homologise the tressa then the tressa castigate the beulah. The karylin is coastwise.", "logic": "\nnot Fierce(tressa)\nCoastwise(tressa)\nCastigate(tressa, beulah)\nCastigate(tressa, karylin)\nMisuse(tressa, beulah)\nMisuse(tressa, karylin)\nnot Homologise(tressa, karylin)\nUnsent(beulah)\nnot Coastwise(beulah)\nnot Aplacental(beulah)\nCastigate(beulah, tressa)\nFierce(karylin)\nAplacental(karylin)\nCastigate(karylin, beulah)\nnot Misuse(karylin, tressa)\nHomologise(karylin, tressa)\nforall x (Homologise(x, beulah) -> Misuse(beulah, karylin))\nHomologise(tressa, karylin) and not Castigate(beulah, tressa) -> not Castigate(tressa, karylin)\nforall x (Homologise(x, karylin) and Misuse(x, karylin) -> not Castigate(x, beulah))\nMisuse(tressa, beulah) and Coastwise(tressa) -> not Eradicable(tressa)\nforall x (Misuse(x, tressa) -> not Misuse(tressa, karylin))\nforall x (Homologise(x, tressa) -> Castigate(tressa, beulah))\n\nCoastwise(karylin)\n\nCoastwise(karylin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The dorian is not mussy. The dorian is weeklong. The dorian chomp the goose. The dorian chomp the annette. The dorian bullyrag the goose. The dorian bullyrag the annette. The dorian does not visit the annette. The goose is orphaned. The goose is not weeklong. The goose is not efferent. The goose chomp the dorian. The annette is mussy. The annette is efferent. The annette chomp the goose. The annette does not see the dorian. The annette nullify the dorian. If someone nullify the goose then the goose bullyrag the annette. If the dorian nullify the annette and the goose does not like the dorian then the dorian does not like the annette. If someone nullify the annette and they see the annette then they do not like the goose. If the dorian bullyrag the goose and the dorian is weeklong then the dorian is not abranchial. If someone bullyrag the dorian then the dorian does not see the annette. If someone nullify the dorian then the dorian chomp the goose. The dorian is not efferent.", "logic": "\nnot Mussy(dorian)\nWeeklong(dorian)\nChomp(dorian, goose)\nChomp(dorian, annette)\nBullyrag(dorian, goose)\nBullyrag(dorian, annette)\nnot Nullify(dorian, annette)\nOrphaned(goose)\nnot Weeklong(goose)\nnot Efferent(goose)\nChomp(goose, dorian)\nMussy(annette)\nEfferent(annette)\nChomp(annette, goose)\nnot Bullyrag(annette, dorian)\nNullify(annette, dorian)\nforall x (Nullify(x, goose) -> Bullyrag(goose, annette))\nNullify(dorian, annette) and not Chomp(goose, dorian) -> not Chomp(dorian, annette)\nforall x (Nullify(x, annette) and Bullyrag(x, annette) -> not Chomp(x, goose))\nBullyrag(dorian, goose) and Weeklong(dorian) -> not Abranchial(dorian)\nforall x (Bullyrag(x, dorian) -> not Bullyrag(dorian, annette))\nforall x (Nullify(x, dorian) -> Chomp(dorian, goose))\n\nnot Efferent(dorian)\n\nnot Efferent(dorian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The carolyne is not scalene. The carolyne is asserted. The carolyne unsolder the ethelbert. The carolyne unsolder the lavinie. The carolyne bath the ethelbert. The carolyne bath the lavinie. The carolyne does not visit the lavinie. The ethelbert is wacky. The ethelbert is not asserted. The ethelbert is not macro. The ethelbert unsolder the carolyne. The lavinie is scalene. The lavinie is macro. The lavinie unsolder the ethelbert. The lavinie does not see the carolyne. The lavinie substitute the carolyne. If someone substitute the ethelbert then the ethelbert bath the lavinie. If the carolyne substitute the lavinie and the ethelbert does not like the carolyne then the carolyne does not like the lavinie. If someone substitute the lavinie and they see the lavinie then they do not like the ethelbert. If the carolyne bath the ethelbert and the carolyne is asserted then the carolyne is not contrived. If someone bath the carolyne then the carolyne does not see the lavinie. If someone substitute the carolyne then the carolyne unsolder the ethelbert. The ethelbert substitute the lavinie.", "logic": "\nnot Scalene(carolyne)\nAsserted(carolyne)\nUnsolder(carolyne, ethelbert)\nUnsolder(carolyne, lavinie)\nBath(carolyne, ethelbert)\nBath(carolyne, lavinie)\nnot Substitute(carolyne, lavinie)\nWacky(ethelbert)\nnot Asserted(ethelbert)\nnot Macro(ethelbert)\nUnsolder(ethelbert, carolyne)\nScalene(lavinie)\nMacro(lavinie)\nUnsolder(lavinie, ethelbert)\nnot Bath(lavinie, carolyne)\nSubstitute(lavinie, carolyne)\nforall x (Substitute(x, ethelbert) -> Bath(ethelbert, lavinie))\nSubstitute(carolyne, lavinie) and not Unsolder(ethelbert, carolyne) -> not Unsolder(carolyne, lavinie)\nforall x (Substitute(x, lavinie) and Bath(x, lavinie) -> not Unsolder(x, ethelbert))\nBath(carolyne, ethelbert) and Asserted(carolyne) -> not Contrived(carolyne)\nforall x (Bath(x, carolyne) -> not Bath(carolyne, lavinie))\nforall x (Substitute(x, carolyne) -> Unsolder(carolyne, ethelbert))\n\nSubstitute(ethelbert, lavinie)\n\nSubstitute(ethelbert, lavinie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-830"} {"premises": "The aeriela instrument the carmelle. The edy does not like the aeriela. The bamby is cocksure. The carmelle stupefy the edy. If something stupefy the carmelle then it does not eat the carmelle. If something is compressed and it instrument the edy then the edy is sliced. If something is beta and sliced then it does not like the carmelle. If something is compressed then it does not visit the aeriela. If something is beta then it is compressed. If something stupefy the edy and it vellicate the bamby then the edy vellicate the carmelle. If something instrument the carmelle then the carmelle is beta. If something is menacing and not sliced then it is cocksure. The aeriela instrument the carmelle.", "logic": "\nInstrument(aeriela, carmelle)\nnot Vellicate(edy, aeriela)\nCocksure(bamby)\nStupefy(carmelle, edy)\nforall x (Stupefy(x, carmelle) -> not Instrument(x, carmelle))\nforall x (Compressed(x) and Instrument(x, edy) -> Sliced(edy))\nforall x (Beta(x) and Sliced(x) -> not Vellicate(x, carmelle))\nforall x (Compressed(x) -> not Stupefy(x, aeriela))\nforall x (Beta(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Stupefy(x, edy) and Vellicate(x, bamby) -> Vellicate(edy, carmelle))\nforall x (Instrument(x, carmelle) -> Beta(carmelle))\nforall x (Menacing(x) and not Sliced(x) -> Cocksure(x))\n\nInstrument(aeriela, carmelle)\n\ntherefore Instrument(aeriela, carmelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The wandis remodel the mohammed. The sylvester does not like the wandis. The corilla is peaceful. The mohammed chill the sylvester. If something chill the mohammed then it does not eat the mohammed. If something is cabalistic and it remodel the sylvester then the sylvester is ready. If something is unpainted and ready then it does not like the mohammed. If something is cabalistic then it does not visit the wandis. If something is unpainted then it is cabalistic. If something chill the sylvester and it gratify the corilla then the sylvester gratify the mohammed. If something remodel the mohammed then the mohammed is unpainted. If something is unrhymed and not ready then it is peaceful. The sylvester gratify the wandis.", "logic": "\nRemodel(wandis, mohammed)\nnot Gratify(sylvester, wandis)\nPeaceful(corilla)\nChill(mohammed, sylvester)\nforall x (Chill(x, mohammed) -> not Remodel(x, mohammed))\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) and Remodel(x, sylvester) -> Ready(sylvester))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Ready(x) -> not Gratify(x, mohammed))\nforall x (Cabalistic(x) -> not Chill(x, wandis))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Cabalistic(x))\nforall x (Chill(x, sylvester) and Gratify(x, corilla) -> Gratify(sylvester, mohammed))\nforall x (Remodel(x, mohammed) -> Unpainted(mohammed))\nforall x (Unrhymed(x) and not Ready(x) -> Peaceful(x))\n\nGratify(sylvester, wandis)\n\ntherefore not Gratify(sylvester, wandis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The zebulon suck the torin. The tandi does not like the zebulon. The julio is sellable. The torin tabularise the tandi. If something tabularise the torin then it does not eat the torin. If something is weepy and it suck the tandi then the tandi is carpeted. If something is aeriform and carpeted then it does not like the torin. If something is weepy then it does not visit the zebulon. If something is aeriform then it is weepy. If something tabularise the tandi and it shop the julio then the tandi shop the torin. If something suck the torin then the torin is aeriform. If something is seventeen and not carpeted then it is sellable. The torin is aeriform.", "logic": "\nSuck(zebulon, torin)\nnot Shop(tandi, zebulon)\nSellable(julio)\nTabularise(torin, tandi)\nforall x (Tabularise(x, torin) -> not Suck(x, torin))\nforall x (Weepy(x) and Suck(x, tandi) -> Carpeted(tandi))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) and Carpeted(x) -> not Shop(x, torin))\nforall x (Weepy(x) -> not Tabularise(x, zebulon))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Weepy(x))\nforall x (Tabularise(x, tandi) and Shop(x, julio) -> Shop(tandi, torin))\nforall x (Suck(x, torin) -> Aeriform(torin))\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and not Carpeted(x) -> Sellable(x))\n\nAeriform(torin)\n\nSuck(zebulon, torin) and forall x (Suck(x, torin) -> Aeriform(torin)) -> therefore Aeriform(torin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The sally mainline the rhianna. The lindy does not like the sally. The bernadina is giddy. The rhianna homologise the lindy. If something homologise the rhianna then it does not eat the rhianna. If something is agonising and it mainline the lindy then the lindy is motionless. If something is mechanic and motionless then it does not like the rhianna. If something is agonising then it does not visit the sally. If something is mechanic then it is agonising. If something homologise the lindy and it reckon the bernadina then the lindy reckon the rhianna. If something mainline the rhianna then the rhianna is mechanic. If something is egocentric and not motionless then it is giddy. The rhianna is not mechanic.", "logic": "\nMainline(sally, rhianna)\nnot Reckon(lindy, sally)\nGiddy(bernadina)\nHomologise(rhianna, lindy)\nforall x (Homologise(x, rhianna) -> not Mainline(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Agonising(x) and Mainline(x, lindy) -> Motionless(lindy))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) and Motionless(x) -> not Reckon(x, rhianna))\nforall x (Agonising(x) -> not Homologise(x, sally))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Homologise(x, lindy) and Reckon(x, bernadina) -> Reckon(lindy, rhianna))\nforall x (Mainline(x, rhianna) -> Mechanic(rhianna))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and not Motionless(x) -> Giddy(x))\n\nnot Mechanic(rhianna)\n\nMainline(sally, rhianna) and forall x (Mainline(x, rhianna) -> Mechanic(rhianna)) -> therefore Mechanic(rhianna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The adey hassle the guenevere. The quill does not like the adey. The chariot is auxinic. The guenevere bloom the quill. If something bloom the guenevere then it does not eat the guenevere. If something is stated and it hassle the quill then the quill is edentulous. If something is tearful and edentulous then it does not like the guenevere. If something is stated then it does not visit the adey. If something is tearful then it is stated. If something bloom the quill and it pirouette the chariot then the quill pirouette the guenevere. If something hassle the guenevere then the guenevere is tearful. If something is twisted and not edentulous then it is auxinic. The guenevere is stated.", "logic": "\nHassle(adey, guenevere)\nnot Pirouette(quill, adey)\nAuxinic(chariot)\nBloom(guenevere, quill)\nforall x (Bloom(x, guenevere) -> not Hassle(x, guenevere))\nforall x (Stated(x) and Hassle(x, quill) -> Edentulous(quill))\nforall x (Tearful(x) and Edentulous(x) -> not Pirouette(x, guenevere))\nforall x (Stated(x) -> not Bloom(x, adey))\nforall x (Tearful(x) -> Stated(x))\nforall x (Bloom(x, quill) and Pirouette(x, chariot) -> Pirouette(quill, guenevere))\nforall x (Hassle(x, guenevere) -> Tearful(guenevere))\nforall x (Twisted(x) and not Edentulous(x) -> Auxinic(x))\n\nStated(guenevere)\n\nHassle(adey, guenevere) and forall x (Hassle(x, guenevere) -> Tearful(guenevere)) -> therefore Tearful(guenevere) Tearful(guenevere) and forall x (Tearful(x) -> Stated(x)) -> therefore Stated(guenevere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The cicily infringe the birdie. The ulric does not like the cicily. The georgie is aryan. The birdie backbite the ulric. If something backbite the birdie then it does not eat the birdie. If something is energising and it infringe the ulric then the ulric is musty. If something is yeasty and musty then it does not like the birdie. If something is energising then it does not visit the cicily. If something is yeasty then it is energising. If something backbite the ulric and it volatilize the georgie then the ulric volatilize the birdie. If something infringe the birdie then the birdie is yeasty. If something is pussy and not musty then it is aryan. The birdie is not energising.", "logic": "\nInfringe(cicily, birdie)\nnot Volatilize(ulric, cicily)\nAryan(georgie)\nBackbite(birdie, ulric)\nforall x (Backbite(x, birdie) -> not Infringe(x, birdie))\nforall x (Energising(x) and Infringe(x, ulric) -> Musty(ulric))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) and Musty(x) -> not Volatilize(x, birdie))\nforall x (Energising(x) -> not Backbite(x, cicily))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Energising(x))\nforall x (Backbite(x, ulric) and Volatilize(x, georgie) -> Volatilize(ulric, birdie))\nforall x (Infringe(x, birdie) -> Yeasty(birdie))\nforall x (Pussy(x) and not Musty(x) -> Aryan(x))\n\nnot Energising(birdie)\n\nInfringe(cicily, birdie) and forall x (Infringe(x, birdie) -> Yeasty(birdie)) -> therefore Yeasty(birdie) Yeasty(birdie) and forall x (Yeasty(x) -> Energising(x)) -> therefore Energising(birdie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The morley accelerate the gwendolyn. The sinclare does not like the morley. The cherey is dress. The gwendolyn overdose the sinclare. If something overdose the gwendolyn then it does not eat the gwendolyn. If something is ruined and it accelerate the sinclare then the sinclare is unified. If something is nodding and unified then it does not like the gwendolyn. If something is ruined then it does not visit the morley. If something is nodding then it is ruined. If something overdose the sinclare and it jangle the cherey then the sinclare jangle the gwendolyn. If something accelerate the gwendolyn then the gwendolyn is nodding. If something is northwest and not unified then it is dress. The gwendolyn does not visit the morley.", "logic": "\nAccelerate(morley, gwendolyn)\nnot Jangle(sinclare, morley)\nDress(cherey)\nOverdose(gwendolyn, sinclare)\nforall x (Overdose(x, gwendolyn) -> not Accelerate(x, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Ruined(x) and Accelerate(x, sinclare) -> Unified(sinclare))\nforall x (Nodding(x) and Unified(x) -> not Jangle(x, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Ruined(x) -> not Overdose(x, morley))\nforall x (Nodding(x) -> Ruined(x))\nforall x (Overdose(x, sinclare) and Jangle(x, cherey) -> Jangle(sinclare, gwendolyn))\nforall x (Accelerate(x, gwendolyn) -> Nodding(gwendolyn))\nforall x (Northwest(x) and not Unified(x) -> Dress(x))\n\nnot Overdose(gwendolyn, morley)\n\nAccelerate(morley, gwendolyn) and forall x (Accelerate(x, gwendolyn) -> Nodding(gwendolyn)) -> therefore Nodding(gwendolyn) Nodding(gwendolyn) and forall x (Nodding(x) -> Ruined(x)) -> therefore Ruined(gwendolyn) Ruined(gwendolyn) and forall x (Ruined(x) -> not Overdose(x, morley)) -> therefore not Overdose(gwendolyn, morley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The rahel hoover the edna. The karsten does not like the rahel. The bee is tuneful. The edna loosen the karsten. If something loosen the edna then it does not eat the edna. If something is quasi and it hoover the karsten then the karsten is bouncing. If something is carmine and bouncing then it does not like the edna. If something is quasi then it does not visit the rahel. If something is carmine then it is quasi. If something loosen the karsten and it encroach the bee then the karsten encroach the edna. If something hoover the edna then the edna is carmine. If something is sibilant and not bouncing then it is tuneful. The edna loosen the rahel.", "logic": "\nHoover(rahel, edna)\nnot Encroach(karsten, rahel)\nTuneful(bee)\nLoosen(edna, karsten)\nforall x (Loosen(x, edna) -> not Hoover(x, edna))\nforall x (Quasi(x) and Hoover(x, karsten) -> Bouncing(karsten))\nforall x (Carmine(x) and Bouncing(x) -> not Encroach(x, edna))\nforall x (Quasi(x) -> not Loosen(x, rahel))\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> Quasi(x))\nforall x (Loosen(x, karsten) and Encroach(x, bee) -> Encroach(karsten, edna))\nforall x (Hoover(x, edna) -> Carmine(edna))\nforall x (Sibilant(x) and not Bouncing(x) -> Tuneful(x))\n\nLoosen(edna, rahel)\n\nHoover(rahel, edna) and forall x (Hoover(x, edna) -> Carmine(edna)) -> therefore Carmine(edna) Carmine(edna) and forall x (Carmine(x) -> Quasi(x)) -> therefore Quasi(edna) Quasi(edna) and forall x (Quasi(x) -> not Loosen(x, rahel)) -> therefore not Loosen(edna, rahel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The ofilia cork the wildon. The edward does not like the ofilia. The marcile is teetotal. The wildon outpace the edward. If something outpace the wildon then it does not eat the wildon. If something is convolute and it cork the edward then the edward is sick. If something is canonist and sick then it does not like the wildon. If something is convolute then it does not visit the ofilia. If something is canonist then it is convolute. If something outpace the edward and it jelly the marcile then the edward jelly the wildon. If something cork the wildon then the wildon is canonist. If something is whatever and not sick then it is teetotal. The edward is not convolute.", "logic": "\nCork(ofilia, wildon)\nnot Jelly(edward, ofilia)\nTeetotal(marcile)\nOutpace(wildon, edward)\nforall x (Outpace(x, wildon) -> not Cork(x, wildon))\nforall x (Convolute(x) and Cork(x, edward) -> Sick(edward))\nforall x (Canonist(x) and Sick(x) -> not Jelly(x, wildon))\nforall x (Convolute(x) -> not Outpace(x, ofilia))\nforall x (Canonist(x) -> Convolute(x))\nforall x (Outpace(x, edward) and Jelly(x, marcile) -> Jelly(edward, wildon))\nforall x (Cork(x, wildon) -> Canonist(wildon))\nforall x (Whatever(x) and not Sick(x) -> Teetotal(x))\n\nnot Convolute(edward)\n\nforall x (Canonist(x) -> Convolute(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The nilson colourize the cornelia. The zippy does not like the nilson. The mohammad is spongy. The cornelia spark the zippy. If something spark the cornelia then it does not eat the cornelia. If something is aggressive and it colourize the zippy then the zippy is screwy. If something is centigrade and screwy then it does not like the cornelia. If something is aggressive then it does not visit the nilson. If something is centigrade then it is aggressive. If something spark the zippy and it clew the mohammad then the zippy clew the cornelia. If something colourize the cornelia then the cornelia is centigrade. If something is dyslectic and not screwy then it is spongy. The nilson is spongy.", "logic": "\nColourize(nilson, cornelia)\nnot Clew(zippy, nilson)\nSpongy(mohammad)\nSpark(cornelia, zippy)\nforall x (Spark(x, cornelia) -> not Colourize(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Aggressive(x) and Colourize(x, zippy) -> Screwy(zippy))\nforall x (Centigrade(x) and Screwy(x) -> not Clew(x, cornelia))\nforall x (Aggressive(x) -> not Spark(x, nilson))\nforall x (Centigrade(x) -> Aggressive(x))\nforall x (Spark(x, zippy) and Clew(x, mohammad) -> Clew(zippy, cornelia))\nforall x (Colourize(x, cornelia) -> Centigrade(cornelia))\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) and not Screwy(x) -> Spongy(x))\n\nSpongy(nilson)\n\nforall x (Dyslectic(x) and not Screwy(x) -> Spongy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The charyl want the jillie. The rahal does not like the charyl. The adriaens is voltarian. The jillie claxon the rahal. If something claxon the jillie then it does not eat the jillie. If something is monogynic and it want the rahal then the rahal is balconied. If something is photogenic and balconied then it does not like the jillie. If something is monogynic then it does not visit the charyl. If something is photogenic then it is monogynic. If something claxon the rahal and it streamline the adriaens then the rahal streamline the jillie. If something want the jillie then the jillie is photogenic. If something is slopped and not balconied then it is voltarian. The rahal does not like the jillie.", "logic": "\nWant(charyl, jillie)\nnot Streamline(rahal, charyl)\nVoltarian(adriaens)\nClaxon(jillie, rahal)\nforall x (Claxon(x, jillie) -> not Want(x, jillie))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) and Want(x, rahal) -> Balconied(rahal))\nforall x (Photogenic(x) and Balconied(x) -> not Streamline(x, jillie))\nforall x (Monogynic(x) -> not Claxon(x, charyl))\nforall x (Photogenic(x) -> Monogynic(x))\nforall x (Claxon(x, rahal) and Streamline(x, adriaens) -> Streamline(rahal, jillie))\nforall x (Want(x, jillie) -> Photogenic(jillie))\nforall x (Slopped(x) and not Balconied(x) -> Voltarian(x))\n\nnot Streamline(rahal, jillie)\n\nforall x (Claxon(x, rahal) and Streamline(x, adriaens) -> Streamline(rahal, jillie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The christan alert the rich. The gabie does not like the christan. The esmaria is syllabic. The rich bare the gabie. If something bare the rich then it does not eat the rich. If something is enticing and it alert the gabie then the gabie is prolusory. If something is unmated and prolusory then it does not like the rich. If something is enticing then it does not visit the christan. If something is unmated then it is enticing. If something bare the gabie and it tote the esmaria then the gabie tote the rich. If something alert the rich then the rich is unmated. If something is uniate and not prolusory then it is syllabic. The rich is syllabic.", "logic": "\nAlert(christan, rich)\nnot Tote(gabie, christan)\nSyllabic(esmaria)\nBare(rich, gabie)\nforall x (Bare(x, rich) -> not Alert(x, rich))\nforall x (Enticing(x) and Alert(x, gabie) -> Prolusory(gabie))\nforall x (Unmated(x) and Prolusory(x) -> not Tote(x, rich))\nforall x (Enticing(x) -> not Bare(x, christan))\nforall x (Unmated(x) -> Enticing(x))\nforall x (Bare(x, gabie) and Tote(x, esmaria) -> Tote(gabie, rich))\nforall x (Alert(x, rich) -> Unmated(rich))\nforall x (Uniate(x) and not Prolusory(x) -> Syllabic(x))\n\nSyllabic(rich)\n\nforall x (Uniate(x) and not Prolusory(x) -> Syllabic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The ibby devilize the cynthy. The hadley does not like the ibby. The fredra is woodsy. The cynthy chasten the hadley. If something chasten the cynthy then it does not eat the cynthy. If something is salted and it devilize the hadley then the hadley is lacerated. If something is reserved and lacerated then it does not like the cynthy. If something is salted then it does not visit the ibby. If something is reserved then it is salted. If something chasten the hadley and it unitise the fredra then the hadley unitise the cynthy. If something devilize the cynthy then the cynthy is reserved. If something is uninsured and not lacerated then it is woodsy. The ibby does not like the ibby.", "logic": "\nDevilize(ibby, cynthy)\nnot Unitise(hadley, ibby)\nWoodsy(fredra)\nChasten(cynthy, hadley)\nforall x (Chasten(x, cynthy) -> not Devilize(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Salted(x) and Devilize(x, hadley) -> Lacerated(hadley))\nforall x (Reserved(x) and Lacerated(x) -> not Unitise(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Salted(x) -> not Chasten(x, ibby))\nforall x (Reserved(x) -> Salted(x))\nforall x (Chasten(x, hadley) and Unitise(x, fredra) -> Unitise(hadley, cynthy))\nforall x (Devilize(x, cynthy) -> Reserved(cynthy))\nforall x (Uninsured(x) and not Lacerated(x) -> Woodsy(x))\n\nnot Unitise(ibby, ibby)\n\nnot Unitise(ibby, ibby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The fannie itch the vale. The giovanne does not like the fannie. The keren is grisly. The vale link the giovanne. If something link the vale then it does not eat the vale. If something is perfected and it itch the giovanne then the giovanne is isochronal. If something is pituitary and isochronal then it does not like the vale. If something is perfected then it does not visit the fannie. If something is pituitary then it is perfected. If something link the giovanne and it unscrew the keren then the giovanne unscrew the vale. If something itch the vale then the vale is pituitary. If something is schmaltzy and not isochronal then it is grisly. The fannie link the vale.", "logic": "\nItch(fannie, vale)\nnot Unscrew(giovanne, fannie)\nGrisly(keren)\nLink(vale, giovanne)\nforall x (Link(x, vale) -> not Itch(x, vale))\nforall x (Perfected(x) and Itch(x, giovanne) -> Isochronal(giovanne))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) and Isochronal(x) -> not Unscrew(x, vale))\nforall x (Perfected(x) -> not Link(x, fannie))\nforall x (Pituitary(x) -> Perfected(x))\nforall x (Link(x, giovanne) and Unscrew(x, keren) -> Unscrew(giovanne, vale))\nforall x (Itch(x, vale) -> Pituitary(vale))\nforall x (Schmaltzy(x) and not Isochronal(x) -> Grisly(x))\n\nLink(fannie, vale)\n\nLink(fannie, vale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The oralle renew the reza. The linea does not like the oralle. The gen is accurate. The reza cadge the linea. If something cadge the reza then it does not eat the reza. If something is glossy and it renew the linea then the linea is quartan. If something is aerolitic and quartan then it does not like the reza. If something is glossy then it does not visit the oralle. If something is aerolitic then it is glossy. If something cadge the linea and it unburden the gen then the linea unburden the reza. If something renew the reza then the reza is aerolitic. If something is acapnic and not quartan then it is accurate. The linea does not visit the gen.", "logic": "\nRenew(oralle, reza)\nnot Unburden(linea, oralle)\nAccurate(gen)\nCadge(reza, linea)\nforall x (Cadge(x, reza) -> not Renew(x, reza))\nforall x (Glossy(x) and Renew(x, linea) -> Quartan(linea))\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) and Quartan(x) -> not Unburden(x, reza))\nforall x (Glossy(x) -> not Cadge(x, oralle))\nforall x (Aerolitic(x) -> Glossy(x))\nforall x (Cadge(x, linea) and Unburden(x, gen) -> Unburden(linea, reza))\nforall x (Renew(x, reza) -> Aerolitic(reza))\nforall x (Acapnic(x) and not Quartan(x) -> Accurate(x))\n\nnot Cadge(linea, gen)\n\nnot Cadge(linea, gen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "The wyndham ooze the sue. The lorna does not like the wyndham. The eduard is wilted. The sue sling the lorna. If something sling the sue then it does not eat the sue. If something is unmeasured and it ooze the lorna then the lorna is pervasive. If something is fenestral and pervasive then it does not like the sue. If something is unmeasured then it does not visit the wyndham. If something is fenestral then it is unmeasured. If something sling the lorna and it concert the eduard then the lorna concert the sue. If something ooze the sue then the sue is fenestral. If something is amnesiac and not pervasive then it is wilted. The eduard concert the eduard.", "logic": "\nOoze(wyndham, sue)\nnot Concert(lorna, wyndham)\nWilted(eduard)\nSling(sue, lorna)\nforall x (Sling(x, sue) -> not Ooze(x, sue))\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) and Ooze(x, lorna) -> Pervasive(lorna))\nforall x (Fenestral(x) and Pervasive(x) -> not Concert(x, sue))\nforall x (Unmeasured(x) -> not Sling(x, wyndham))\nforall x (Fenestral(x) -> Unmeasured(x))\nforall x (Sling(x, lorna) and Concert(x, eduard) -> Concert(lorna, sue))\nforall x (Ooze(x, sue) -> Fenestral(sue))\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) and not Pervasive(x) -> Wilted(x))\n\nConcert(eduard, eduard)\n\nConcert(eduard, eduard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-36"} {"premises": "Rodolphe is ulcerative. Rodolphe is adducting. Rodolphe is sunstruck. Rodolphe is cynical. Rodolphe is saponified. Rodolphe is cuspidate. Rodolphe is imposed. If something is adducting then it is sunstruck. If Rodolphe is saponified then Rodolphe is adducting. If something is cuspidate and saponified then it is ulcerative. If something is imposed then it is sunstruck. All saponified things are imposed. All saponified, sunstruck things are adducting. Red, ulcerative things are adducting. If Rodolphe is ulcerative and Rodolphe is adducting then Rodolphe is cuspidate. Rodolphe is cuspidate.", "logic": "\nUlcerative(rodolphe)\nAdducting(rodolphe)\nSunstruck(rodolphe)\nCynical(rodolphe)\nSaponified(rodolphe)\nCuspidate(rodolphe)\nImposed(rodolphe)\nforall x (Adducting(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\nSaponified(rodolphe) -> Adducting(rodolphe)\nforall x (Cuspidate(x) and Saponified(x) -> Ulcerative(x))\nforall x (Imposed(x) -> Sunstruck(x))\nforall x (Saponified(x) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Saponified(x) and Sunstruck(x) -> Adducting(x))\nforall x (Cynical(x) and Ulcerative(x) -> Adducting(x))\nUlcerative(rodolphe) and Adducting(rodolphe) -> Cuspidate(rodolphe)\n\nCuspidate(rodolphe)\n\ntherefore Cuspidate(rodolphe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4167"} {"premises": "Dayna is sandlike. Dayna is pedantic. Dayna is dormy. Dayna is spiked. Dayna is microsomal. Dayna is dystopian. Dayna is syllabled. If something is pedantic then it is dormy. If Dayna is microsomal then Dayna is pedantic. If something is dystopian and microsomal then it is sandlike. If something is syllabled then it is dormy. All microsomal things are syllabled. All microsomal, dormy things are pedantic. Red, sandlike things are pedantic. If Dayna is sandlike and Dayna is pedantic then Dayna is dystopian. Dayna is not spiked.", "logic": "\nSandlike(dayna)\nPedantic(dayna)\nDormy(dayna)\nSpiked(dayna)\nMicrosomal(dayna)\nDystopian(dayna)\nSyllabled(dayna)\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Dormy(x))\nMicrosomal(dayna) -> Pedantic(dayna)\nforall x (Dystopian(x) and Microsomal(x) -> Sandlike(x))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Syllabled(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) and Dormy(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Spiked(x) and Sandlike(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nSandlike(dayna) and Pedantic(dayna) -> Dystopian(dayna)\n\nnot Spiked(dayna)\n\ntherefore Spiked(dayna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-4167"} {"premises": "Jay is defunct. Forester is calcuttan. Biddy is glaswegian. If something is calcuttan then it is tudor. Jay is defunct.", "logic": "\nDefunct(jay)\nCalcuttan(forester)\nGlaswegian(biddy)\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) -> Tudor(x))\n\nDefunct(jay)\n\ntherefore Defunct(jay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "Jessika is rich. Wally is academic. Roarke is lengthy. If something is academic then it is slow. Roarke is not lengthy.", "logic": "\nRich(jessika)\nAcademic(wally)\nLengthy(roarke)\nforall x (Academic(x) -> Slow(x))\n\nnot Lengthy(roarke)\n\ntherefore Lengthy(roarke)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "Ludwig is forcipate. Ibby is assignable. Adi is concentric. If something is assignable then it is fissile. Ibby is fissile.", "logic": "\nForcipate(ludwig)\nAssignable(ibby)\nConcentric(adi)\nforall x (Assignable(x) -> Fissile(x))\n\nFissile(ibby)\n\nAssignable(ibby) and forall x (Assignable(x) -> Fissile(x)) -> therefore Fissile(ibby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "Renault is womanish. Aida is divided. Binni is stonelike. If something is divided then it is libyan. Aida is not libyan.", "logic": "\nWomanish(renault)\nDivided(aida)\nStonelike(binni)\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Libyan(x))\n\nnot Libyan(aida)\n\nDivided(aida) and forall x (Divided(x) -> Libyan(x)) -> therefore Libyan(aida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "Correna is split. Caryn is springy. Aggi is uncensored. If something is springy then it is kookie. Aggi is not kookie.", "logic": "\nSplit(correna)\nSpringy(caryn)\nUncensored(aggi)\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Kookie(x))\n\nnot Kookie(aggi)\n\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Kookie(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "Sybila is untipped. Gracie is stealthy. Daile is freshman. If something is stealthy then it is mangled. Sybila is mangled.", "logic": "\nUntipped(sybila)\nStealthy(gracie)\nFreshman(daile)\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Mangled(x))\n\nMangled(sybila)\n\nforall x (Stealthy(x) -> Mangled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "Kalila is recusant. Wilson is abducting. Kristos is parched. If something is abducting then it is unpolluted. Kristos is not abducting.", "logic": "\nRecusant(kalila)\nAbducting(wilson)\nParched(kristos)\nforall x (Abducting(x) -> Unpolluted(x))\n\nnot Abducting(kristos)\n\nnot Abducting(kristos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "Germana is crying. Felicle is unrelated. Vinnie is croaky. If something is unrelated then it is laboured. Felicle is crying.", "logic": "\nCrying(germana)\nUnrelated(felicle)\nCroaky(vinnie)\nforall x (Unrelated(x) -> Laboured(x))\n\nCrying(felicle)\n\nCrying(felicle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2113"} {"premises": "The jacinda is inapt. The jacinda is urbanised. The jacinda is romish. The jacinda lord the pearle. The jacinda dismember the marketa. The marketa is chintzy. The marketa lord the pearle. The marketa dismember the pearle. The pearle delimitate the jacinda. The pearle delimitate the marketa. The pearle is inapt. The pearle is artificial. The pearle is romish. The pearle lord the jacinda. The pearle dismember the jacinda. Big people are artificial. If someone lord the marketa then the marketa lord the jacinda. If the pearle is romish then the pearle delimitate the marketa. If someone is romish then they like the marketa. If someone delimitate the pearle then they like the pearle. If someone is chintzy then they chase the marketa. The pearle is romish.", "logic": "\nInapt(jacinda)\nUrbanised(jacinda)\nRomish(jacinda)\nLord(jacinda, pearle)\nDismember(jacinda, marketa)\nChintzy(marketa)\nLord(marketa, pearle)\nDismember(marketa, pearle)\nDelimitate(pearle, jacinda)\nDelimitate(pearle, marketa)\nInapt(pearle)\nArtificial(pearle)\nRomish(pearle)\nLord(pearle, jacinda)\nDismember(pearle, jacinda)\nforall x (Inapt(x) -> Artificial(x))\nforall x (Lord(x, marketa) -> Lord(marketa, jacinda))\nRomish(pearle) -> Delimitate(pearle, marketa)\nforall x (Romish(x) -> Lord(x, marketa))\nforall x (Delimitate(x, pearle) -> Lord(x, pearle))\nforall x (Chintzy(x) -> Delimitate(x, marketa))\n\nRomish(pearle)\n\ntherefore Romish(pearle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6016"} {"premises": "The erma is flyaway. The erma is gruelling. The erma is angelical. The erma slag the leopold. The erma laminate the grady. The grady is humified. The grady slag the leopold. The grady laminate the leopold. The leopold powerwash the erma. The leopold powerwash the grady. The leopold is flyaway. The leopold is thinking. The leopold is angelical. The leopold slag the erma. The leopold laminate the erma. Big people are thinking. If someone slag the grady then the grady slag the erma. If the leopold is angelical then the leopold powerwash the grady. If someone is angelical then they like the grady. If someone powerwash the leopold then they like the leopold. If someone is humified then they chase the grady. The grady is not humified.", "logic": "\nFlyaway(erma)\nGruelling(erma)\nAngelical(erma)\nSlag(erma, leopold)\nLaminate(erma, grady)\nHumified(grady)\nSlag(grady, leopold)\nLaminate(grady, leopold)\nPowerwash(leopold, erma)\nPowerwash(leopold, grady)\nFlyaway(leopold)\nThinking(leopold)\nAngelical(leopold)\nSlag(leopold, erma)\nLaminate(leopold, erma)\nforall x (Flyaway(x) -> Thinking(x))\nforall x (Slag(x, grady) -> Slag(grady, erma))\nAngelical(leopold) -> Powerwash(leopold, grady)\nforall x (Angelical(x) -> Slag(x, grady))\nforall x (Powerwash(x, leopold) -> Slag(x, leopold))\nforall x (Humified(x) -> Powerwash(x, grady))\n\nnot Humified(grady)\n\ntherefore Humified(grady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6016"} {"premises": "The sherry is titillated. The sherry is lipless. The sherry is described. The sherry aline the corrianne. The sherry dingdong the trenna. The trenna is postictal. The trenna aline the corrianne. The trenna dingdong the corrianne. The corrianne fail the sherry. The corrianne fail the trenna. The corrianne is titillated. The corrianne is decreased. The corrianne is described. The corrianne aline the sherry. The corrianne dingdong the sherry. Big people are decreased. If someone aline the trenna then the trenna aline the sherry. If the corrianne is described then the corrianne fail the trenna. If someone is described then they like the trenna. If someone fail the corrianne then they like the corrianne. If someone is postictal then they chase the trenna. The sherry does not chase the trenna.", "logic": "\nTitillated(sherry)\nLipless(sherry)\nDescribed(sherry)\nAline(sherry, corrianne)\nDingdong(sherry, trenna)\nPostictal(trenna)\nAline(trenna, corrianne)\nDingdong(trenna, corrianne)\nFail(corrianne, sherry)\nFail(corrianne, trenna)\nTitillated(corrianne)\nDecreased(corrianne)\nDescribed(corrianne)\nAline(corrianne, sherry)\nDingdong(corrianne, sherry)\nforall x (Titillated(x) -> Decreased(x))\nforall x (Aline(x, trenna) -> Aline(trenna, sherry))\nDescribed(corrianne) -> Fail(corrianne, trenna)\nforall x (Described(x) -> Aline(x, trenna))\nforall x (Fail(x, corrianne) -> Aline(x, corrianne))\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Fail(x, trenna))\n\nnot Fail(sherry, trenna)\n\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Fail(x, trenna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6016"} {"premises": "The paddy is angry. The paddy is haughty. The paddy is aghast. The paddy plagiarize the casi. The paddy foxhunt the chrisy. The chrisy is mellow. The chrisy plagiarize the casi. The chrisy foxhunt the casi. The casi valuate the paddy. The casi valuate the chrisy. The casi is angry. The casi is senatorial. The casi is aghast. The casi plagiarize the paddy. The casi foxhunt the paddy. Big people are senatorial. If someone plagiarize the chrisy then the chrisy plagiarize the paddy. If the casi is aghast then the casi valuate the chrisy. If someone is aghast then they like the chrisy. If someone valuate the casi then they like the casi. If someone is mellow then they chase the chrisy. The paddy valuate the casi.", "logic": "\nAngry(paddy)\nHaughty(paddy)\nAghast(paddy)\nPlagiarize(paddy, casi)\nFoxhunt(paddy, chrisy)\nMellow(chrisy)\nPlagiarize(chrisy, casi)\nFoxhunt(chrisy, casi)\nValuate(casi, paddy)\nValuate(casi, chrisy)\nAngry(casi)\nSenatorial(casi)\nAghast(casi)\nPlagiarize(casi, paddy)\nFoxhunt(casi, paddy)\nforall x (Angry(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Plagiarize(x, chrisy) -> Plagiarize(chrisy, paddy))\nAghast(casi) -> Valuate(casi, chrisy)\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Plagiarize(x, chrisy))\nforall x (Valuate(x, casi) -> Plagiarize(x, casi))\nforall x (Mellow(x) -> Valuate(x, chrisy))\n\nValuate(paddy, casi)\n\nValuate(paddy, casi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-6016"} {"premises": "The myra fence the philly. The myra fence the sansone. The philly is ingenuous. The godfree fence the sansone. The godfree is humbling. The godfree plat the myra. The godfree major the sansone. The sansone is humbling. The sansone is dacitic. The sansone plat the myra. If someone fence the myra then the myra major the godfree. If someone fence the myra then they eat the sansone. Cold people are audacious. If the myra plat the sansone and the sansone is not dacitic then the sansone is not ingenuous. If someone major the myra then the myra is dacitic. If someone is audacious then they eat the myra. If someone major the godfree then the godfree does not like the sansone. If someone fence the godfree and the godfree does not like the sansone then the godfree is not lapidarian. The godfree is humbling.", "logic": "\nFence(myra, philly)\nFence(myra, sansone)\nIngenuous(philly)\nFence(godfree, sansone)\nHumbling(godfree)\nPlat(godfree, myra)\nMajor(godfree, sansone)\nHumbling(sansone)\nDacitic(sansone)\nPlat(sansone, myra)\nforall x (Fence(x, myra) -> Major(myra, godfree))\nforall x (Fence(x, myra) -> Fence(x, sansone))\nforall x (Ingenuous(x) -> Audacious(x))\nPlat(myra, sansone) and not Dacitic(sansone) -> not Ingenuous(sansone)\nforall x (Major(x, myra) -> Dacitic(myra))\nforall x (Audacious(x) -> Fence(x, myra))\nforall x (Major(x, godfree) -> not Plat(godfree, sansone))\nforall x (Fence(x, godfree) and not Plat(godfree, sansone) -> not Lapidarian(godfree))\n\nHumbling(godfree)\n\ntherefore Humbling(godfree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The vaclav rescue the morrie. The vaclav rescue the abigale. The morrie is timorous. The darb rescue the abigale. The darb is subacute. The darb blate the vaclav. The darb squirt the abigale. The abigale is subacute. The abigale is unmanned. The abigale blate the vaclav. If someone rescue the vaclav then the vaclav squirt the darb. If someone rescue the vaclav then they eat the abigale. Cold people are incurable. If the vaclav blate the abigale and the abigale is not unmanned then the abigale is not timorous. If someone squirt the vaclav then the vaclav is unmanned. If someone is incurable then they eat the vaclav. If someone squirt the darb then the darb does not like the abigale. If someone rescue the darb and the darb does not like the abigale then the darb is not cardiac. The vaclav does not eat the morrie.", "logic": "\nRescue(vaclav, morrie)\nRescue(vaclav, abigale)\nTimorous(morrie)\nRescue(darb, abigale)\nSubacute(darb)\nBlate(darb, vaclav)\nSquirt(darb, abigale)\nSubacute(abigale)\nUnmanned(abigale)\nBlate(abigale, vaclav)\nforall x (Rescue(x, vaclav) -> Squirt(vaclav, darb))\nforall x (Rescue(x, vaclav) -> Rescue(x, abigale))\nforall x (Timorous(x) -> Incurable(x))\nBlate(vaclav, abigale) and not Unmanned(abigale) -> not Timorous(abigale)\nforall x (Squirt(x, vaclav) -> Unmanned(vaclav))\nforall x (Incurable(x) -> Rescue(x, vaclav))\nforall x (Squirt(x, darb) -> not Blate(darb, abigale))\nforall x (Rescue(x, darb) and not Blate(darb, abigale) -> not Cardiac(darb))\n\nnot Rescue(vaclav, morrie)\n\ntherefore Rescue(vaclav, morrie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The joe blockade the ichabod. The joe blockade the kitty. The ichabod is lxxvii. The mirabella blockade the kitty. The mirabella is continuant. The mirabella overstrain the joe. The mirabella revenge the kitty. The kitty is continuant. The kitty is dateless. The kitty overstrain the joe. If someone blockade the joe then the joe revenge the mirabella. If someone blockade the joe then they eat the kitty. Cold people are christlike. If the joe overstrain the kitty and the kitty is not dateless then the kitty is not lxxvii. If someone revenge the joe then the joe is dateless. If someone is christlike then they eat the joe. If someone revenge the mirabella then the mirabella does not like the kitty. If someone blockade the mirabella and the mirabella does not like the kitty then the mirabella is not positional. The ichabod is christlike.", "logic": "\nBlockade(joe, ichabod)\nBlockade(joe, kitty)\nLxxvii(ichabod)\nBlockade(mirabella, kitty)\nContinuant(mirabella)\nOverstrain(mirabella, joe)\nRevenge(mirabella, kitty)\nContinuant(kitty)\nDateless(kitty)\nOverstrain(kitty, joe)\nforall x (Blockade(x, joe) -> Revenge(joe, mirabella))\nforall x (Blockade(x, joe) -> Blockade(x, kitty))\nforall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Christlike(x))\nOverstrain(joe, kitty) and not Dateless(kitty) -> not Lxxvii(kitty)\nforall x (Revenge(x, joe) -> Dateless(joe))\nforall x (Christlike(x) -> Blockade(x, joe))\nforall x (Revenge(x, mirabella) -> not Overstrain(mirabella, kitty))\nforall x (Blockade(x, mirabella) and not Overstrain(mirabella, kitty) -> not Positional(mirabella))\n\nChristlike(ichabod)\n\nLxxvii(ichabod) and forall x (Lxxvii(x) -> Christlike(x)) -> therefore Christlike(ichabod)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The myrtie soot the jocelin. The myrtie soot the donovan. The jocelin is nursed. The darien soot the donovan. The darien is elating. The darien hassle the myrtie. The darien weary the donovan. The donovan is elating. The donovan is every. The donovan hassle the myrtie. If someone soot the myrtie then the myrtie weary the darien. If someone soot the myrtie then they eat the donovan. Cold people are hypodermal. If the myrtie hassle the donovan and the donovan is not every then the donovan is not nursed. If someone weary the myrtie then the myrtie is every. If someone is hypodermal then they eat the myrtie. If someone weary the darien then the darien does not like the donovan. If someone soot the darien and the darien does not like the donovan then the darien is not capsulated. The jocelin is not hypodermal.", "logic": "\nSoot(myrtie, jocelin)\nSoot(myrtie, donovan)\nNursed(jocelin)\nSoot(darien, donovan)\nElating(darien)\nHassle(darien, myrtie)\nWeary(darien, donovan)\nElating(donovan)\nEvery(donovan)\nHassle(donovan, myrtie)\nforall x (Soot(x, myrtie) -> Weary(myrtie, darien))\nforall x (Soot(x, myrtie) -> Soot(x, donovan))\nforall x (Nursed(x) -> Hypodermal(x))\nHassle(myrtie, donovan) and not Every(donovan) -> not Nursed(donovan)\nforall x (Weary(x, myrtie) -> Every(myrtie))\nforall x (Hypodermal(x) -> Soot(x, myrtie))\nforall x (Weary(x, darien) -> not Hassle(darien, donovan))\nforall x (Soot(x, darien) and not Hassle(darien, donovan) -> not Capsulated(darien))\n\nnot Hypodermal(jocelin)\n\nNursed(jocelin) and forall x (Nursed(x) -> Hypodermal(x)) -> therefore Hypodermal(jocelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The heath tariff the durand. The heath tariff the kipp. The durand is herbaceous. The uriel tariff the kipp. The uriel is cxxv. The uriel enforce the heath. The uriel nictate the kipp. The kipp is cxxv. The kipp is chewable. The kipp enforce the heath. If someone tariff the heath then the heath nictate the uriel. If someone tariff the heath then they eat the kipp. Cold people are echoic. If the heath enforce the kipp and the kipp is not chewable then the kipp is not herbaceous. If someone nictate the heath then the heath is chewable. If someone is echoic then they eat the heath. If someone nictate the uriel then the uriel does not like the kipp. If someone tariff the uriel and the uriel does not like the kipp then the uriel is not flatulent. The durand tariff the heath.", "logic": "\nTariff(heath, durand)\nTariff(heath, kipp)\nHerbaceous(durand)\nTariff(uriel, kipp)\nCxxv(uriel)\nEnforce(uriel, heath)\nNictate(uriel, kipp)\nCxxv(kipp)\nChewable(kipp)\nEnforce(kipp, heath)\nforall x (Tariff(x, heath) -> Nictate(heath, uriel))\nforall x (Tariff(x, heath) -> Tariff(x, kipp))\nforall x (Herbaceous(x) -> Echoic(x))\nEnforce(heath, kipp) and not Chewable(kipp) -> not Herbaceous(kipp)\nforall x (Nictate(x, heath) -> Chewable(heath))\nforall x (Echoic(x) -> Tariff(x, heath))\nforall x (Nictate(x, uriel) -> not Enforce(uriel, kipp))\nforall x (Tariff(x, uriel) and not Enforce(uriel, kipp) -> not Flatulent(uriel))\n\nTariff(durand, heath)\n\nHerbaceous(durand) and forall x (Herbaceous(x) -> Echoic(x)) -> therefore Echoic(durand) Echoic(durand) and forall x (Echoic(x) -> Tariff(x, heath)) -> therefore Tariff(durand, heath)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The harrold homogenize the kayley. The harrold homogenize the elayne. The kayley is lamblike. The saunder homogenize the elayne. The saunder is fidgety. The saunder meter the harrold. The saunder emaciate the elayne. The elayne is fidgety. The elayne is triclinic. The elayne meter the harrold. If someone homogenize the harrold then the harrold emaciate the saunder. If someone homogenize the harrold then they eat the elayne. Cold people are used. If the harrold meter the elayne and the elayne is not triclinic then the elayne is not lamblike. If someone emaciate the harrold then the harrold is triclinic. If someone is used then they eat the harrold. If someone emaciate the saunder then the saunder does not like the elayne. If someone homogenize the saunder and the saunder does not like the elayne then the saunder is not auctorial. The kayley does not eat the harrold.", "logic": "\nHomogenize(harrold, kayley)\nHomogenize(harrold, elayne)\nLamblike(kayley)\nHomogenize(saunder, elayne)\nFidgety(saunder)\nMeter(saunder, harrold)\nEmaciate(saunder, elayne)\nFidgety(elayne)\nTriclinic(elayne)\nMeter(elayne, harrold)\nforall x (Homogenize(x, harrold) -> Emaciate(harrold, saunder))\nforall x (Homogenize(x, harrold) -> Homogenize(x, elayne))\nforall x (Lamblike(x) -> Used(x))\nMeter(harrold, elayne) and not Triclinic(elayne) -> not Lamblike(elayne)\nforall x (Emaciate(x, harrold) -> Triclinic(harrold))\nforall x (Used(x) -> Homogenize(x, harrold))\nforall x (Emaciate(x, saunder) -> not Meter(saunder, elayne))\nforall x (Homogenize(x, saunder) and not Meter(saunder, elayne) -> not Auctorial(saunder))\n\nnot Homogenize(kayley, harrold)\n\nLamblike(kayley) and forall x (Lamblike(x) -> Used(x)) -> therefore Used(kayley) Used(kayley) and forall x (Used(x) -> Homogenize(x, harrold)) -> therefore Homogenize(kayley, harrold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The gert photocopy the ame. The gert photocopy the rozalin. The ame is wordless. The sarajane photocopy the rozalin. The sarajane is exhausting. The sarajane chiromance the gert. The sarajane glory the rozalin. The rozalin is exhausting. The rozalin is mystical. The rozalin chiromance the gert. If someone photocopy the gert then the gert glory the sarajane. If someone photocopy the gert then they eat the rozalin. Cold people are blindfold. If the gert chiromance the rozalin and the rozalin is not mystical then the rozalin is not wordless. If someone glory the gert then the gert is mystical. If someone is blindfold then they eat the gert. If someone glory the sarajane then the sarajane does not like the rozalin. If someone photocopy the sarajane and the sarajane does not like the rozalin then the sarajane is not exhaustive. The gert glory the sarajane.", "logic": "\nPhotocopy(gert, ame)\nPhotocopy(gert, rozalin)\nWordless(ame)\nPhotocopy(sarajane, rozalin)\nExhausting(sarajane)\nChiromance(sarajane, gert)\nGlory(sarajane, rozalin)\nExhausting(rozalin)\nMystical(rozalin)\nChiromance(rozalin, gert)\nforall x (Photocopy(x, gert) -> Glory(gert, sarajane))\nforall x (Photocopy(x, gert) -> Photocopy(x, rozalin))\nforall x (Wordless(x) -> Blindfold(x))\nChiromance(gert, rozalin) and not Mystical(rozalin) -> not Wordless(rozalin)\nforall x (Glory(x, gert) -> Mystical(gert))\nforall x (Blindfold(x) -> Photocopy(x, gert))\nforall x (Glory(x, sarajane) -> not Chiromance(sarajane, rozalin))\nforall x (Photocopy(x, sarajane) and not Chiromance(sarajane, rozalin) -> not Exhaustive(sarajane))\n\nGlory(gert, sarajane)\n\nWordless(ame) and forall x (Wordless(x) -> Blindfold(x)) -> therefore Blindfold(ame) Blindfold(ame) and forall x (Blindfold(x) -> Photocopy(x, gert)) -> therefore Photocopy(ame, gert) Photocopy(ame, gert) and forall x (Photocopy(x, gert) -> Glory(gert, sarajane)) -> therefore Glory(gert, sarajane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The avi crochet the kora. The avi crochet the chuck. The kora is sugarless. The ernest crochet the chuck. The ernest is unexacting. The ernest birth the avi. The ernest literalize the chuck. The chuck is unexacting. The chuck is loamy. The chuck birth the avi. If someone crochet the avi then the avi literalize the ernest. If someone crochet the avi then they eat the chuck. Cold people are duncical. If the avi birth the chuck and the chuck is not loamy then the chuck is not sugarless. If someone literalize the avi then the avi is loamy. If someone is duncical then they eat the avi. If someone literalize the ernest then the ernest does not like the chuck. If someone crochet the ernest and the ernest does not like the chuck then the ernest is not dashed. The kora does not eat the chuck.", "logic": "\nCrochet(avi, kora)\nCrochet(avi, chuck)\nSugarless(kora)\nCrochet(ernest, chuck)\nUnexacting(ernest)\nBirth(ernest, avi)\nLiteralize(ernest, chuck)\nUnexacting(chuck)\nLoamy(chuck)\nBirth(chuck, avi)\nforall x (Crochet(x, avi) -> Literalize(avi, ernest))\nforall x (Crochet(x, avi) -> Crochet(x, chuck))\nforall x (Sugarless(x) -> Duncical(x))\nBirth(avi, chuck) and not Loamy(chuck) -> not Sugarless(chuck)\nforall x (Literalize(x, avi) -> Loamy(avi))\nforall x (Duncical(x) -> Crochet(x, avi))\nforall x (Literalize(x, ernest) -> not Birth(ernest, chuck))\nforall x (Crochet(x, ernest) and not Birth(ernest, chuck) -> not Dashed(ernest))\n\nnot Crochet(kora, chuck)\n\nSugarless(kora) and forall x (Sugarless(x) -> Duncical(x)) -> therefore Duncical(kora) Duncical(kora) and forall x (Duncical(x) -> Crochet(x, avi)) -> therefore Crochet(kora, avi) Crochet(kora, avi) and forall x (Crochet(x, avi) -> Crochet(x, chuck)) -> therefore Crochet(kora, chuck)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The shira empty the jule. The shira empty the sherlocke. The jule is fired. The darb empty the sherlocke. The darb is latish. The darb rarefy the shira. The darb gratify the sherlocke. The sherlocke is latish. The sherlocke is included. The sherlocke rarefy the shira. If someone empty the shira then the shira gratify the darb. If someone empty the shira then they eat the sherlocke. Cold people are affixal. If the shira rarefy the sherlocke and the sherlocke is not included then the sherlocke is not fired. If someone gratify the shira then the shira is included. If someone is affixal then they eat the shira. If someone gratify the darb then the darb does not like the sherlocke. If someone empty the darb and the darb does not like the sherlocke then the darb is not rumbling. The sherlocke does not eat the shira.", "logic": "\nEmpty(shira, jule)\nEmpty(shira, sherlocke)\nFired(jule)\nEmpty(darb, sherlocke)\nLatish(darb)\nRarefy(darb, shira)\nGratify(darb, sherlocke)\nLatish(sherlocke)\nIncluded(sherlocke)\nRarefy(sherlocke, shira)\nforall x (Empty(x, shira) -> Gratify(shira, darb))\nforall x (Empty(x, shira) -> Empty(x, sherlocke))\nforall x (Fired(x) -> Affixal(x))\nRarefy(shira, sherlocke) and not Included(sherlocke) -> not Fired(sherlocke)\nforall x (Gratify(x, shira) -> Included(shira))\nforall x (Affixal(x) -> Empty(x, shira))\nforall x (Gratify(x, darb) -> not Rarefy(darb, sherlocke))\nforall x (Empty(x, darb) and not Rarefy(darb, sherlocke) -> not Rumbling(darb))\n\nnot Empty(sherlocke, shira)\n\nforall x (Affixal(x) -> Empty(x, shira)) <- forall x (Fired(x) -> Affixal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The morlee educate the tammara. The morlee educate the cassondra. The tammara is tiptoe. The heida educate the cassondra. The heida is supine. The heida denude the morlee. The heida herd the cassondra. The cassondra is supine. The cassondra is baltic. The cassondra denude the morlee. If someone educate the morlee then the morlee herd the heida. If someone educate the morlee then they eat the cassondra. Cold people are trim. If the morlee denude the cassondra and the cassondra is not baltic then the cassondra is not tiptoe. If someone herd the morlee then the morlee is baltic. If someone is trim then they eat the morlee. If someone herd the heida then the heida does not like the cassondra. If someone educate the heida and the heida does not like the cassondra then the heida is not found. The morlee educate the morlee.", "logic": "\nEducate(morlee, tammara)\nEducate(morlee, cassondra)\nTiptoe(tammara)\nEducate(heida, cassondra)\nSupine(heida)\nDenude(heida, morlee)\nHerd(heida, cassondra)\nSupine(cassondra)\nBaltic(cassondra)\nDenude(cassondra, morlee)\nforall x (Educate(x, morlee) -> Herd(morlee, heida))\nforall x (Educate(x, morlee) -> Educate(x, cassondra))\nforall x (Tiptoe(x) -> Trim(x))\nDenude(morlee, cassondra) and not Baltic(cassondra) -> not Tiptoe(cassondra)\nforall x (Herd(x, morlee) -> Baltic(morlee))\nforall x (Trim(x) -> Educate(x, morlee))\nforall x (Herd(x, heida) -> not Denude(heida, cassondra))\nforall x (Educate(x, heida) and not Denude(heida, cassondra) -> not Found(heida))\n\nEducate(morlee, morlee)\n\nforall x (Trim(x) -> Educate(x, morlee)) <- forall x (Tiptoe(x) -> Trim(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The alane telescope the randolph. The alane telescope the elsey. The randolph is unploughed. The walden telescope the elsey. The walden is lettered. The walden wedge the alane. The walden abstract the elsey. The elsey is lettered. The elsey is asserted. The elsey wedge the alane. If someone telescope the alane then the alane abstract the walden. If someone telescope the alane then they eat the elsey. Cold people are gifted. If the alane wedge the elsey and the elsey is not asserted then the elsey is not unploughed. If someone abstract the alane then the alane is asserted. If someone is gifted then they eat the alane. If someone abstract the walden then the walden does not like the elsey. If someone telescope the walden and the walden does not like the elsey then the walden is not straw. The alane is not asserted.", "logic": "\nTelescope(alane, randolph)\nTelescope(alane, elsey)\nUnploughed(randolph)\nTelescope(walden, elsey)\nLettered(walden)\nWedge(walden, alane)\nAbstract(walden, elsey)\nLettered(elsey)\nAsserted(elsey)\nWedge(elsey, alane)\nforall x (Telescope(x, alane) -> Abstract(alane, walden))\nforall x (Telescope(x, alane) -> Telescope(x, elsey))\nforall x (Unploughed(x) -> Gifted(x))\nWedge(alane, elsey) and not Asserted(elsey) -> not Unploughed(elsey)\nforall x (Abstract(x, alane) -> Asserted(alane))\nforall x (Gifted(x) -> Telescope(x, alane))\nforall x (Abstract(x, walden) -> not Wedge(walden, elsey))\nforall x (Telescope(x, walden) and not Wedge(walden, elsey) -> not Straw(walden))\n\nnot Asserted(alane)\n\nforall x (Abstract(x, alane) -> Asserted(alane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The zebulen backtrack the nicoli. The zebulen backtrack the colette. The nicoli is suchlike. The adriena backtrack the colette. The adriena is pubic. The adriena reenforce the zebulen. The adriena lacerate the colette. The colette is pubic. The colette is turbulent. The colette reenforce the zebulen. If someone backtrack the zebulen then the zebulen lacerate the adriena. If someone backtrack the zebulen then they eat the colette. Cold people are brackish. If the zebulen reenforce the colette and the colette is not turbulent then the colette is not suchlike. If someone lacerate the zebulen then the zebulen is turbulent. If someone is brackish then they eat the zebulen. If someone lacerate the adriena then the adriena does not like the colette. If someone backtrack the adriena and the adriena does not like the colette then the adriena is not septate. The colette is brackish.", "logic": "\nBacktrack(zebulen, nicoli)\nBacktrack(zebulen, colette)\nSuchlike(nicoli)\nBacktrack(adriena, colette)\nPubic(adriena)\nReenforce(adriena, zebulen)\nLacerate(adriena, colette)\nPubic(colette)\nTurbulent(colette)\nReenforce(colette, zebulen)\nforall x (Backtrack(x, zebulen) -> Lacerate(zebulen, adriena))\nforall x (Backtrack(x, zebulen) -> Backtrack(x, colette))\nforall x (Suchlike(x) -> Brackish(x))\nReenforce(zebulen, colette) and not Turbulent(colette) -> not Suchlike(colette)\nforall x (Lacerate(x, zebulen) -> Turbulent(zebulen))\nforall x (Brackish(x) -> Backtrack(x, zebulen))\nforall x (Lacerate(x, adriena) -> not Reenforce(adriena, colette))\nforall x (Backtrack(x, adriena) and not Reenforce(adriena, colette) -> not Septate(adriena))\n\nBrackish(colette)\n\nforall x (Suchlike(x) -> Brackish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The weber chloroform the mika. The weber chloroform the elric. The mika is frangible. The glynn chloroform the elric. The glynn is enormous. The glynn gallivant the weber. The glynn busk the elric. The elric is enormous. The elric is backhanded. The elric gallivant the weber. If someone chloroform the weber then the weber busk the glynn. If someone chloroform the weber then they eat the elric. Cold people are chinchy. If the weber gallivant the elric and the elric is not backhanded then the elric is not frangible. If someone busk the weber then the weber is backhanded. If someone is chinchy then they eat the weber. If someone busk the glynn then the glynn does not like the elric. If someone chloroform the glynn and the glynn does not like the elric then the glynn is not essential. The glynn does not like the mika.", "logic": "\nChloroform(weber, mika)\nChloroform(weber, elric)\nFrangible(mika)\nChloroform(glynn, elric)\nEnormous(glynn)\nGallivant(glynn, weber)\nBusk(glynn, elric)\nEnormous(elric)\nBackhanded(elric)\nGallivant(elric, weber)\nforall x (Chloroform(x, weber) -> Busk(weber, glynn))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, weber) -> Chloroform(x, elric))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Chinchy(x))\nGallivant(weber, elric) and not Backhanded(elric) -> not Frangible(elric)\nforall x (Busk(x, weber) -> Backhanded(weber))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) -> Chloroform(x, weber))\nforall x (Busk(x, glynn) -> not Gallivant(glynn, elric))\nforall x (Chloroform(x, glynn) and not Gallivant(glynn, elric) -> not Essential(glynn))\n\nnot Gallivant(glynn, mika)\n\nnot Gallivant(glynn, mika) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The jill ricochet the hari. The jill ricochet the jaquelin. The hari is unplanted. The julianna ricochet the jaquelin. The julianna is anal. The julianna militarise the jill. The julianna oxidise the jaquelin. The jaquelin is anal. The jaquelin is unexciting. The jaquelin militarise the jill. If someone ricochet the jill then the jill oxidise the julianna. If someone ricochet the jill then they eat the jaquelin. Cold people are cocky. If the jill militarise the jaquelin and the jaquelin is not unexciting then the jaquelin is not unplanted. If someone oxidise the jill then the jill is unexciting. If someone is cocky then they eat the jill. If someone oxidise the julianna then the julianna does not like the jaquelin. If someone ricochet the julianna and the julianna does not like the jaquelin then the julianna is not speedy. The jill oxidise the hari.", "logic": "\nRicochet(jill, hari)\nRicochet(jill, jaquelin)\nUnplanted(hari)\nRicochet(julianna, jaquelin)\nAnal(julianna)\nMilitarise(julianna, jill)\nOxidise(julianna, jaquelin)\nAnal(jaquelin)\nUnexciting(jaquelin)\nMilitarise(jaquelin, jill)\nforall x (Ricochet(x, jill) -> Oxidise(jill, julianna))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, jill) -> Ricochet(x, jaquelin))\nforall x (Unplanted(x) -> Cocky(x))\nMilitarise(jill, jaquelin) and not Unexciting(jaquelin) -> not Unplanted(jaquelin)\nforall x (Oxidise(x, jill) -> Unexciting(jill))\nforall x (Cocky(x) -> Ricochet(x, jill))\nforall x (Oxidise(x, julianna) -> not Militarise(julianna, jaquelin))\nforall x (Ricochet(x, julianna) and not Militarise(julianna, jaquelin) -> not Speedy(julianna))\n\nOxidise(jill, hari)\n\nOxidise(jill, hari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The jaquith repent the austin. The jaquith repent the chad. The austin is indolent. The kittie repent the chad. The kittie is nonlexical. The kittie premier the jaquith. The kittie work the chad. The chad is nonlexical. The chad is errorless. The chad premier the jaquith. If someone repent the jaquith then the jaquith work the kittie. If someone repent the jaquith then they eat the chad. Cold people are palliative. If the jaquith premier the chad and the chad is not errorless then the chad is not indolent. If someone work the jaquith then the jaquith is errorless. If someone is palliative then they eat the jaquith. If someone work the kittie then the kittie does not like the chad. If someone repent the kittie and the kittie does not like the chad then the kittie is not cybernetic. The jaquith does not like the jaquith.", "logic": "\nRepent(jaquith, austin)\nRepent(jaquith, chad)\nIndolent(austin)\nRepent(kittie, chad)\nNonlexical(kittie)\nPremier(kittie, jaquith)\nWork(kittie, chad)\nNonlexical(chad)\nErrorless(chad)\nPremier(chad, jaquith)\nforall x (Repent(x, jaquith) -> Work(jaquith, kittie))\nforall x (Repent(x, jaquith) -> Repent(x, chad))\nforall x (Indolent(x) -> Palliative(x))\nPremier(jaquith, chad) and not Errorless(chad) -> not Indolent(chad)\nforall x (Work(x, jaquith) -> Errorless(jaquith))\nforall x (Palliative(x) -> Repent(x, jaquith))\nforall x (Work(x, kittie) -> not Premier(kittie, chad))\nforall x (Repent(x, kittie) and not Premier(kittie, chad) -> not Cybernetic(kittie))\n\nnot Premier(jaquith, jaquith)\n\nnot Premier(jaquith, jaquith) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The leyla derate the redmond. The leyla derate the eduard. The redmond is synoptic. The zara derate the eduard. The zara is iterative. The zara erupt the leyla. The zara overprint the eduard. The eduard is iterative. The eduard is glassless. The eduard erupt the leyla. If someone derate the leyla then the leyla overprint the zara. If someone derate the leyla then they eat the eduard. Cold people are motivated. If the leyla erupt the eduard and the eduard is not glassless then the eduard is not synoptic. If someone overprint the leyla then the leyla is glassless. If someone is motivated then they eat the leyla. If someone overprint the zara then the zara does not like the eduard. If someone derate the zara and the zara does not like the eduard then the zara is not loud. The redmond is loud.", "logic": "\nDerate(leyla, redmond)\nDerate(leyla, eduard)\nSynoptic(redmond)\nDerate(zara, eduard)\nIterative(zara)\nErupt(zara, leyla)\nOverprint(zara, eduard)\nIterative(eduard)\nGlassless(eduard)\nErupt(eduard, leyla)\nforall x (Derate(x, leyla) -> Overprint(leyla, zara))\nforall x (Derate(x, leyla) -> Derate(x, eduard))\nforall x (Synoptic(x) -> Motivated(x))\nErupt(leyla, eduard) and not Glassless(eduard) -> not Synoptic(eduard)\nforall x (Overprint(x, leyla) -> Glassless(leyla))\nforall x (Motivated(x) -> Derate(x, leyla))\nforall x (Overprint(x, zara) -> not Erupt(zara, eduard))\nforall x (Derate(x, zara) and not Erupt(zara, eduard) -> not Loud(zara))\n\nLoud(redmond)\n\nLoud(redmond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-944"} {"premises": "The ebeneser shorten the inez. The ebeneser is swept. The ebeneser is sweptback. The inez is swept. The inez is not sweptback. The inez patter the ebeneser. The inez draft the ebeneser. If the ebeneser patter the inez and the inez is not swept then the ebeneser is sweptback. If the ebeneser patter the inez then the ebeneser is sweptback. If someone patter the ebeneser then the ebeneser patter the inez. If the inez draft the ebeneser and the inez does not like the ebeneser then the ebeneser patter the inez. If someone patter the ebeneser and the ebeneser does not like the inez then the inez is boracic. If someone is sweptback and they do not chase the inez then they chase the ebeneser. If someone patter the ebeneser and they are not boracic then they are sweptback. If someone patter the inez and the inez is not sweptback then they need the inez. The inez is swept.", "logic": "\nShorten(ebeneser, inez)\nSwept(ebeneser)\nSweptback(ebeneser)\nSwept(inez)\nnot Sweptback(inez)\nPatter(inez, ebeneser)\nDraft(inez, ebeneser)\nPatter(ebeneser, inez) and not Swept(inez) -> Sweptback(ebeneser)\nPatter(ebeneser, inez) -> Sweptback(ebeneser)\nforall x (Patter(x, ebeneser) -> Patter(ebeneser, inez))\nDraft(inez, ebeneser) and not Patter(inez, ebeneser) -> Patter(ebeneser, inez)\nforall x (Patter(x, ebeneser) and not Patter(ebeneser, inez) -> Boracic(inez))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and not Shorten(x, inez) -> Shorten(x, ebeneser))\nforall x (Patter(x, ebeneser) and not Boracic(x) -> Sweptback(x))\nforall x (Patter(x, inez) and not Sweptback(inez) -> Draft(x, inez))\n\nSwept(inez)\n\ntherefore Swept(inez)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The andrey ascend the maribeth. The andrey is retral. The andrey is peruvian. The maribeth is retral. The maribeth is not peruvian. The maribeth tree the andrey. The maribeth persevere the andrey. If the andrey tree the maribeth and the maribeth is not retral then the andrey is peruvian. If the andrey tree the maribeth then the andrey is peruvian. If someone tree the andrey then the andrey tree the maribeth. If the maribeth persevere the andrey and the maribeth does not like the andrey then the andrey tree the maribeth. If someone tree the andrey and the andrey does not like the maribeth then the maribeth is manifest. If someone is peruvian and they do not chase the maribeth then they chase the andrey. If someone tree the andrey and they are not manifest then they are peruvian. If someone tree the maribeth and the maribeth is not peruvian then they need the maribeth. The maribeth does not need the andrey.", "logic": "\nAscend(andrey, maribeth)\nRetral(andrey)\nPeruvian(andrey)\nRetral(maribeth)\nnot Peruvian(maribeth)\nTree(maribeth, andrey)\nPersevere(maribeth, andrey)\nTree(andrey, maribeth) and not Retral(maribeth) -> Peruvian(andrey)\nTree(andrey, maribeth) -> Peruvian(andrey)\nforall x (Tree(x, andrey) -> Tree(andrey, maribeth))\nPersevere(maribeth, andrey) and not Tree(maribeth, andrey) -> Tree(andrey, maribeth)\nforall x (Tree(x, andrey) and not Tree(andrey, maribeth) -> Manifest(maribeth))\nforall x (Peruvian(x) and not Ascend(x, maribeth) -> Ascend(x, andrey))\nforall x (Tree(x, andrey) and not Manifest(x) -> Peruvian(x))\nforall x (Tree(x, maribeth) and not Peruvian(maribeth) -> Persevere(x, maribeth))\n\nnot Persevere(maribeth, andrey)\n\ntherefore Persevere(maribeth, andrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The salvador wholesale the normie. The salvador is isotopic. The salvador is inculpable. The normie is isotopic. The normie is not inculpable. The normie prepose the salvador. The normie stickle the salvador. If the salvador prepose the normie and the normie is not isotopic then the salvador is inculpable. If the salvador prepose the normie then the salvador is inculpable. If someone prepose the salvador then the salvador prepose the normie. If the normie stickle the salvador and the normie does not like the salvador then the salvador prepose the normie. If someone prepose the salvador and the salvador does not like the normie then the normie is deserving. If someone is inculpable and they do not chase the normie then they chase the salvador. If someone prepose the salvador and they are not deserving then they are inculpable. If someone prepose the normie and the normie is not inculpable then they need the normie. The salvador prepose the normie.", "logic": "\nWholesale(salvador, normie)\nIsotopic(salvador)\nInculpable(salvador)\nIsotopic(normie)\nnot Inculpable(normie)\nPrepose(normie, salvador)\nStickle(normie, salvador)\nPrepose(salvador, normie) and not Isotopic(normie) -> Inculpable(salvador)\nPrepose(salvador, normie) -> Inculpable(salvador)\nforall x (Prepose(x, salvador) -> Prepose(salvador, normie))\nStickle(normie, salvador) and not Prepose(normie, salvador) -> Prepose(salvador, normie)\nforall x (Prepose(x, salvador) and not Prepose(salvador, normie) -> Deserving(normie))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) and not Wholesale(x, normie) -> Wholesale(x, salvador))\nforall x (Prepose(x, salvador) and not Deserving(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nforall x (Prepose(x, normie) and not Inculpable(normie) -> Stickle(x, normie))\n\nPrepose(salvador, normie)\n\nPrepose(normie, salvador) and forall x (Prepose(x, salvador) -> Prepose(salvador, normie)) -> therefore Prepose(salvador, normie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The jennings rubify the hortense. The jennings is alveolar. The jennings is embattled. The hortense is alveolar. The hortense is not embattled. The hortense rumpus the jennings. The hortense ooze the jennings. If the jennings rumpus the hortense and the hortense is not alveolar then the jennings is embattled. If the jennings rumpus the hortense then the jennings is embattled. If someone rumpus the jennings then the jennings rumpus the hortense. If the hortense ooze the jennings and the hortense does not like the jennings then the jennings rumpus the hortense. If someone rumpus the jennings and the jennings does not like the hortense then the hortense is lebanese. If someone is embattled and they do not chase the hortense then they chase the jennings. If someone rumpus the jennings and they are not lebanese then they are embattled. If someone rumpus the hortense and the hortense is not embattled then they need the hortense. The jennings does not like the hortense.", "logic": "\nRubify(jennings, hortense)\nAlveolar(jennings)\nEmbattled(jennings)\nAlveolar(hortense)\nnot Embattled(hortense)\nRumpus(hortense, jennings)\nOoze(hortense, jennings)\nRumpus(jennings, hortense) and not Alveolar(hortense) -> Embattled(jennings)\nRumpus(jennings, hortense) -> Embattled(jennings)\nforall x (Rumpus(x, jennings) -> Rumpus(jennings, hortense))\nOoze(hortense, jennings) and not Rumpus(hortense, jennings) -> Rumpus(jennings, hortense)\nforall x (Rumpus(x, jennings) and not Rumpus(jennings, hortense) -> Lebanese(hortense))\nforall x (Embattled(x) and not Rubify(x, hortense) -> Rubify(x, jennings))\nforall x (Rumpus(x, jennings) and not Lebanese(x) -> Embattled(x))\nforall x (Rumpus(x, hortense) and not Embattled(hortense) -> Ooze(x, hortense))\n\nnot Rumpus(jennings, hortense)\n\nRumpus(hortense, jennings) and forall x (Rumpus(x, jennings) -> Rumpus(jennings, hortense)) -> therefore Rumpus(jennings, hortense)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The mallissa deepen the genevra. The mallissa is placeable. The mallissa is uneasy. The genevra is placeable. The genevra is not uneasy. The genevra even the mallissa. The genevra audit the mallissa. If the mallissa even the genevra and the genevra is not placeable then the mallissa is uneasy. If the mallissa even the genevra then the mallissa is uneasy. If someone even the mallissa then the mallissa even the genevra. If the genevra audit the mallissa and the genevra does not like the mallissa then the mallissa even the genevra. If someone even the mallissa and the mallissa does not like the genevra then the genevra is extempore. If someone is uneasy and they do not chase the genevra then they chase the mallissa. If someone even the mallissa and they are not extempore then they are uneasy. If someone even the genevra and the genevra is not uneasy then they need the genevra. The mallissa audit the genevra.", "logic": "\nDeepen(mallissa, genevra)\nPlaceable(mallissa)\nUneasy(mallissa)\nPlaceable(genevra)\nnot Uneasy(genevra)\nEven(genevra, mallissa)\nAudit(genevra, mallissa)\nEven(mallissa, genevra) and not Placeable(genevra) -> Uneasy(mallissa)\nEven(mallissa, genevra) -> Uneasy(mallissa)\nforall x (Even(x, mallissa) -> Even(mallissa, genevra))\nAudit(genevra, mallissa) and not Even(genevra, mallissa) -> Even(mallissa, genevra)\nforall x (Even(x, mallissa) and not Even(mallissa, genevra) -> Extempore(genevra))\nforall x (Uneasy(x) and not Deepen(x, genevra) -> Deepen(x, mallissa))\nforall x (Even(x, mallissa) and not Extempore(x) -> Uneasy(x))\nforall x (Even(x, genevra) and not Uneasy(genevra) -> Audit(x, genevra))\n\nAudit(mallissa, genevra)\n\nEven(genevra, mallissa) and forall x (Even(x, mallissa) -> Even(mallissa, genevra)) -> therefore Even(mallissa, genevra) Even(mallissa, genevra) and not Uneasy(genevra) and forall x (Even(x, genevra) and not Uneasy(genevra) -> Audit(x, genevra)) -> therefore Audit(mallissa, genevra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The claudio deter the tomas. The claudio is cachectic. The claudio is coagulable. The tomas is cachectic. The tomas is not coagulable. The tomas patrol the claudio. The tomas ballast the claudio. If the claudio patrol the tomas and the tomas is not cachectic then the claudio is coagulable. If the claudio patrol the tomas then the claudio is coagulable. If someone patrol the claudio then the claudio patrol the tomas. If the tomas ballast the claudio and the tomas does not like the claudio then the claudio patrol the tomas. If someone patrol the claudio and the claudio does not like the tomas then the tomas is unflavored. If someone is coagulable and they do not chase the tomas then they chase the claudio. If someone patrol the claudio and they are not unflavored then they are coagulable. If someone patrol the tomas and the tomas is not coagulable then they need the tomas. The claudio does not need the tomas.", "logic": "\nDeter(claudio, tomas)\nCachectic(claudio)\nCoagulable(claudio)\nCachectic(tomas)\nnot Coagulable(tomas)\nPatrol(tomas, claudio)\nBallast(tomas, claudio)\nPatrol(claudio, tomas) and not Cachectic(tomas) -> Coagulable(claudio)\nPatrol(claudio, tomas) -> Coagulable(claudio)\nforall x (Patrol(x, claudio) -> Patrol(claudio, tomas))\nBallast(tomas, claudio) and not Patrol(tomas, claudio) -> Patrol(claudio, tomas)\nforall x (Patrol(x, claudio) and not Patrol(claudio, tomas) -> Unflavored(tomas))\nforall x (Coagulable(x) and not Deter(x, tomas) -> Deter(x, claudio))\nforall x (Patrol(x, claudio) and not Unflavored(x) -> Coagulable(x))\nforall x (Patrol(x, tomas) and not Coagulable(tomas) -> Ballast(x, tomas))\n\nnot Ballast(claudio, tomas)\n\nPatrol(tomas, claudio) and forall x (Patrol(x, claudio) -> Patrol(claudio, tomas)) -> therefore Patrol(claudio, tomas) Patrol(claudio, tomas) and not Coagulable(tomas) and forall x (Patrol(x, tomas) and not Coagulable(tomas) -> Ballast(x, tomas)) -> therefore Ballast(claudio, tomas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The pammi limber the carlton. The pammi is excitable. The pammi is destroyed. The carlton is excitable. The carlton is not destroyed. The carlton sensualise the pammi. The carlton didder the pammi. If the pammi sensualise the carlton and the carlton is not excitable then the pammi is destroyed. If the pammi sensualise the carlton then the pammi is destroyed. If someone sensualise the pammi then the pammi sensualise the carlton. If the carlton didder the pammi and the carlton does not like the pammi then the pammi sensualise the carlton. If someone sensualise the pammi and the pammi does not like the carlton then the carlton is bustling. If someone is destroyed and they do not chase the carlton then they chase the pammi. If someone sensualise the pammi and they are not bustling then they are destroyed. If someone sensualise the carlton and the carlton is not destroyed then they need the carlton. The carlton does not chase the pammi.", "logic": "\nLimber(pammi, carlton)\nExcitable(pammi)\nDestroyed(pammi)\nExcitable(carlton)\nnot Destroyed(carlton)\nSensualise(carlton, pammi)\nDidder(carlton, pammi)\nSensualise(pammi, carlton) and not Excitable(carlton) -> Destroyed(pammi)\nSensualise(pammi, carlton) -> Destroyed(pammi)\nforall x (Sensualise(x, pammi) -> Sensualise(pammi, carlton))\nDidder(carlton, pammi) and not Sensualise(carlton, pammi) -> Sensualise(pammi, carlton)\nforall x (Sensualise(x, pammi) and not Sensualise(pammi, carlton) -> Bustling(carlton))\nforall x (Destroyed(x) and not Limber(x, carlton) -> Limber(x, pammi))\nforall x (Sensualise(x, pammi) and not Bustling(x) -> Destroyed(x))\nforall x (Sensualise(x, carlton) and not Destroyed(carlton) -> Didder(x, carlton))\n\nnot Limber(carlton, pammi)\n\nforall x (Destroyed(x) and not Limber(x, carlton) -> Limber(x, pammi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The micheal adjust the jolie. The micheal is basophilic. The micheal is piebald. The jolie is basophilic. The jolie is not piebald. The jolie outweigh the micheal. The jolie catnap the micheal. If the micheal outweigh the jolie and the jolie is not basophilic then the micheal is piebald. If the micheal outweigh the jolie then the micheal is piebald. If someone outweigh the micheal then the micheal outweigh the jolie. If the jolie catnap the micheal and the jolie does not like the micheal then the micheal outweigh the jolie. If someone outweigh the micheal and the micheal does not like the jolie then the jolie is forgotten. If someone is piebald and they do not chase the jolie then they chase the micheal. If someone outweigh the micheal and they are not forgotten then they are piebald. If someone outweigh the jolie and the jolie is not piebald then they need the jolie. The jolie is forgotten.", "logic": "\nAdjust(micheal, jolie)\nBasophilic(micheal)\nPiebald(micheal)\nBasophilic(jolie)\nnot Piebald(jolie)\nOutweigh(jolie, micheal)\nCatnap(jolie, micheal)\nOutweigh(micheal, jolie) and not Basophilic(jolie) -> Piebald(micheal)\nOutweigh(micheal, jolie) -> Piebald(micheal)\nforall x (Outweigh(x, micheal) -> Outweigh(micheal, jolie))\nCatnap(jolie, micheal) and not Outweigh(jolie, micheal) -> Outweigh(micheal, jolie)\nforall x (Outweigh(x, micheal) and not Outweigh(micheal, jolie) -> Forgotten(jolie))\nforall x (Piebald(x) and not Adjust(x, jolie) -> Adjust(x, micheal))\nforall x (Outweigh(x, micheal) and not Forgotten(x) -> Piebald(x))\nforall x (Outweigh(x, jolie) and not Piebald(jolie) -> Catnap(x, jolie))\n\nForgotten(jolie)\n\nforall x (Outweigh(x, micheal) and not Outweigh(micheal, jolie) -> Forgotten(jolie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The lawrence mint the phylys. The lawrence is unselfish. The lawrence is unlicenced. The phylys is unselfish. The phylys is not unlicenced. The phylys bicycle the lawrence. The phylys resorb the lawrence. If the lawrence bicycle the phylys and the phylys is not unselfish then the lawrence is unlicenced. If the lawrence bicycle the phylys then the lawrence is unlicenced. If someone bicycle the lawrence then the lawrence bicycle the phylys. If the phylys resorb the lawrence and the phylys does not like the lawrence then the lawrence bicycle the phylys. If someone bicycle the lawrence and the lawrence does not like the phylys then the phylys is suchlike. If someone is unlicenced and they do not chase the phylys then they chase the lawrence. If someone bicycle the lawrence and they are not suchlike then they are unlicenced. If someone bicycle the phylys and the phylys is not unlicenced then they need the phylys. The lawrence does not chase the lawrence.", "logic": "\nMint(lawrence, phylys)\nUnselfish(lawrence)\nUnlicenced(lawrence)\nUnselfish(phylys)\nnot Unlicenced(phylys)\nBicycle(phylys, lawrence)\nResorb(phylys, lawrence)\nBicycle(lawrence, phylys) and not Unselfish(phylys) -> Unlicenced(lawrence)\nBicycle(lawrence, phylys) -> Unlicenced(lawrence)\nforall x (Bicycle(x, lawrence) -> Bicycle(lawrence, phylys))\nResorb(phylys, lawrence) and not Bicycle(phylys, lawrence) -> Bicycle(lawrence, phylys)\nforall x (Bicycle(x, lawrence) and not Bicycle(lawrence, phylys) -> Suchlike(phylys))\nforall x (Unlicenced(x) and not Mint(x, phylys) -> Mint(x, lawrence))\nforall x (Bicycle(x, lawrence) and not Suchlike(x) -> Unlicenced(x))\nforall x (Bicycle(x, phylys) and not Unlicenced(phylys) -> Resorb(x, phylys))\n\nnot Mint(lawrence, lawrence)\n\nforall x (Unlicenced(x) and not Mint(x, phylys) -> Mint(x, lawrence)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The enrico piddle the tabitha. The enrico is icteric. The enrico is bantu. The tabitha is icteric. The tabitha is not bantu. The tabitha microwave the enrico. The tabitha coast the enrico. If the enrico microwave the tabitha and the tabitha is not icteric then the enrico is bantu. If the enrico microwave the tabitha then the enrico is bantu. If someone microwave the enrico then the enrico microwave the tabitha. If the tabitha coast the enrico and the tabitha does not like the enrico then the enrico microwave the tabitha. If someone microwave the enrico and the enrico does not like the tabitha then the tabitha is illicit. If someone is bantu and they do not chase the tabitha then they chase the enrico. If someone microwave the enrico and they are not illicit then they are bantu. If someone microwave the tabitha and the tabitha is not bantu then they need the tabitha. The enrico microwave the enrico.", "logic": "\nPiddle(enrico, tabitha)\nIcteric(enrico)\nBantu(enrico)\nIcteric(tabitha)\nnot Bantu(tabitha)\nMicrowave(tabitha, enrico)\nCoast(tabitha, enrico)\nMicrowave(enrico, tabitha) and not Icteric(tabitha) -> Bantu(enrico)\nMicrowave(enrico, tabitha) -> Bantu(enrico)\nforall x (Microwave(x, enrico) -> Microwave(enrico, tabitha))\nCoast(tabitha, enrico) and not Microwave(tabitha, enrico) -> Microwave(enrico, tabitha)\nforall x (Microwave(x, enrico) and not Microwave(enrico, tabitha) -> Illicit(tabitha))\nforall x (Bantu(x) and not Piddle(x, tabitha) -> Piddle(x, enrico))\nforall x (Microwave(x, enrico) and not Illicit(x) -> Bantu(x))\nforall x (Microwave(x, tabitha) and not Bantu(tabitha) -> Coast(x, tabitha))\n\nMicrowave(enrico, enrico)\n\nMicrowave(enrico, enrico) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The oralla ratify the dorette. The oralla is euphoric. The oralla is syllabled. The dorette is euphoric. The dorette is not syllabled. The dorette simonize the oralla. The dorette group the oralla. If the oralla simonize the dorette and the dorette is not euphoric then the oralla is syllabled. If the oralla simonize the dorette then the oralla is syllabled. If someone simonize the oralla then the oralla simonize the dorette. If the dorette group the oralla and the dorette does not like the oralla then the oralla simonize the dorette. If someone simonize the oralla and the oralla does not like the dorette then the dorette is calloused. If someone is syllabled and they do not chase the dorette then they chase the oralla. If someone simonize the oralla and they are not calloused then they are syllabled. If someone simonize the dorette and the dorette is not syllabled then they need the dorette. The oralla is not blue.", "logic": "\nRatify(oralla, dorette)\nEuphoric(oralla)\nSyllabled(oralla)\nEuphoric(dorette)\nnot Syllabled(dorette)\nSimonize(dorette, oralla)\nGroup(dorette, oralla)\nSimonize(oralla, dorette) and not Euphoric(dorette) -> Syllabled(oralla)\nSimonize(oralla, dorette) -> Syllabled(oralla)\nforall x (Simonize(x, oralla) -> Simonize(oralla, dorette))\nGroup(dorette, oralla) and not Simonize(dorette, oralla) -> Simonize(oralla, dorette)\nforall x (Simonize(x, oralla) and not Simonize(oralla, dorette) -> Calloused(dorette))\nforall x (Syllabled(x) and not Ratify(x, dorette) -> Ratify(x, oralla))\nforall x (Simonize(x, oralla) and not Calloused(x) -> Syllabled(x))\nforall x (Simonize(x, dorette) and not Syllabled(dorette) -> Group(x, dorette))\n\nnot Blue(oralla)\n\nnot Blue(oralla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The malinde augment the sheelah. The malinde is trashy. The malinde is ergotropic. The sheelah is trashy. The sheelah is not ergotropic. The sheelah suit the malinde. The sheelah unsheathe the malinde. If the malinde suit the sheelah and the sheelah is not trashy then the malinde is ergotropic. If the malinde suit the sheelah then the malinde is ergotropic. If someone suit the malinde then the malinde suit the sheelah. If the sheelah unsheathe the malinde and the sheelah does not like the malinde then the malinde suit the sheelah. If someone suit the malinde and the malinde does not like the sheelah then the sheelah is nightly. If someone is ergotropic and they do not chase the sheelah then they chase the malinde. If someone suit the malinde and they are not nightly then they are ergotropic. If someone suit the sheelah and the sheelah is not ergotropic then they need the sheelah. The sheelah suit the sheelah.", "logic": "\nAugment(malinde, sheelah)\nTrashy(malinde)\nErgotropic(malinde)\nTrashy(sheelah)\nnot Ergotropic(sheelah)\nSuit(sheelah, malinde)\nUnsheathe(sheelah, malinde)\nSuit(malinde, sheelah) and not Trashy(sheelah) -> Ergotropic(malinde)\nSuit(malinde, sheelah) -> Ergotropic(malinde)\nforall x (Suit(x, malinde) -> Suit(malinde, sheelah))\nUnsheathe(sheelah, malinde) and not Suit(sheelah, malinde) -> Suit(malinde, sheelah)\nforall x (Suit(x, malinde) and not Suit(malinde, sheelah) -> Nightly(sheelah))\nforall x (Ergotropic(x) and not Augment(x, sheelah) -> Augment(x, malinde))\nforall x (Suit(x, malinde) and not Nightly(x) -> Ergotropic(x))\nforall x (Suit(x, sheelah) and not Ergotropic(sheelah) -> Unsheathe(x, sheelah))\n\nSuit(sheelah, sheelah)\n\nSuit(sheelah, sheelah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-1881"} {"premises": "The ernesta swosh the wakefield. The wakefield is dilute. If someone dogfight the wakefield then the wakefield is uncaulked. If someone swosh the wakefield then they are unrevealed. If someone is dilute and they need the ernesta then they eat the wakefield. If someone swosh the wakefield then they eat the ernesta. If someone is dyadic and they eat the ernesta then they need the wakefield. If the wakefield dogfight the ernesta then the ernesta dogfight the wakefield. If the ernesta swosh the wakefield and the wakefield is dilute then the ernesta is dyadic. If someone is uncaulked and they do not eat the ernesta then the ernesta accession the wakefield. The wakefield is dilute.", "logic": "\nSwosh(ernesta, wakefield)\nDilute(wakefield)\nforall x (Dogfight(x, wakefield) -> Uncaulked(wakefield))\nforall x (Swosh(x, wakefield) -> Unrevealed(x))\nforall x (Dilute(x) and Dogfight(x, ernesta) -> Swosh(x, wakefield))\nforall x (Swosh(x, wakefield) -> Swosh(x, ernesta))\nforall x (Dyadic(x) and Swosh(x, ernesta) -> Dogfight(x, wakefield))\nDogfight(wakefield, ernesta) -> Dogfight(ernesta, wakefield)\nSwosh(ernesta, wakefield) and Dilute(wakefield) -> Dyadic(ernesta)\nforall x (Uncaulked(x) and not Swosh(x, ernesta) -> Accession(ernesta, wakefield))\n\nDilute(wakefield)\n\ntherefore Dilute(wakefield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The shauna avouch the bobina. The bobina is flyaway. If someone earmark the bobina then the bobina is drowsing. If someone avouch the bobina then they are tearless. If someone is flyaway and they need the shauna then they eat the bobina. If someone avouch the bobina then they eat the shauna. If someone is sweptback and they eat the shauna then they need the bobina. If the bobina earmark the shauna then the shauna earmark the bobina. If the shauna avouch the bobina and the bobina is flyaway then the shauna is sweptback. If someone is drowsing and they do not eat the shauna then the shauna bracket the bobina. The bobina is not flyaway.", "logic": "\nAvouch(shauna, bobina)\nFlyaway(bobina)\nforall x (Earmark(x, bobina) -> Drowsing(bobina))\nforall x (Avouch(x, bobina) -> Tearless(x))\nforall x (Flyaway(x) and Earmark(x, shauna) -> Avouch(x, bobina))\nforall x (Avouch(x, bobina) -> Avouch(x, shauna))\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and Avouch(x, shauna) -> Earmark(x, bobina))\nEarmark(bobina, shauna) -> Earmark(shauna, bobina)\nAvouch(shauna, bobina) and Flyaway(bobina) -> Sweptback(shauna)\nforall x (Drowsing(x) and not Avouch(x, shauna) -> Bracket(shauna, bobina))\n\nnot Flyaway(bobina)\n\ntherefore Flyaway(bobina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The gunner predict the lorraine. The lorraine is unbeloved. If someone bless the lorraine then the lorraine is caducous. If someone predict the lorraine then they are fair. If someone is unbeloved and they need the gunner then they eat the lorraine. If someone predict the lorraine then they eat the gunner. If someone is mantic and they eat the gunner then they need the lorraine. If the lorraine bless the gunner then the gunner bless the lorraine. If the gunner predict the lorraine and the lorraine is unbeloved then the gunner is mantic. If someone is caducous and they do not eat the gunner then the gunner fusillade the lorraine. The gunner predict the gunner.", "logic": "\nPredict(gunner, lorraine)\nUnbeloved(lorraine)\nforall x (Bless(x, lorraine) -> Caducous(lorraine))\nforall x (Predict(x, lorraine) -> Fair(x))\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) and Bless(x, gunner) -> Predict(x, lorraine))\nforall x (Predict(x, lorraine) -> Predict(x, gunner))\nforall x (Mantic(x) and Predict(x, gunner) -> Bless(x, lorraine))\nBless(lorraine, gunner) -> Bless(gunner, lorraine)\nPredict(gunner, lorraine) and Unbeloved(lorraine) -> Mantic(gunner)\nforall x (Caducous(x) and not Predict(x, gunner) -> Fusillade(gunner, lorraine))\n\nPredict(gunner, gunner)\n\nPredict(gunner, lorraine) and forall x (Predict(x, lorraine) -> Predict(x, gunner)) -> therefore Predict(gunner, gunner)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The carlota underpay the jerri. The jerri is luculent. If someone wear the jerri then the jerri is touched. If someone underpay the jerri then they are stoneless. If someone is luculent and they need the carlota then they eat the jerri. If someone underpay the jerri then they eat the carlota. If someone is winsome and they eat the carlota then they need the jerri. If the jerri wear the carlota then the carlota wear the jerri. If the carlota underpay the jerri and the jerri is luculent then the carlota is winsome. If someone is touched and they do not eat the carlota then the carlota flyfish the jerri. The carlota does not eat the carlota.", "logic": "\nUnderpay(carlota, jerri)\nLuculent(jerri)\nforall x (Wear(x, jerri) -> Touched(jerri))\nforall x (Underpay(x, jerri) -> Stoneless(x))\nforall x (Luculent(x) and Wear(x, carlota) -> Underpay(x, jerri))\nforall x (Underpay(x, jerri) -> Underpay(x, carlota))\nforall x (Winsome(x) and Underpay(x, carlota) -> Wear(x, jerri))\nWear(jerri, carlota) -> Wear(carlota, jerri)\nUnderpay(carlota, jerri) and Luculent(jerri) -> Winsome(carlota)\nforall x (Touched(x) and not Underpay(x, carlota) -> Flyfish(carlota, jerri))\n\nnot Underpay(carlota, carlota)\n\nUnderpay(carlota, jerri) and forall x (Underpay(x, jerri) -> Underpay(x, carlota)) -> therefore Underpay(carlota, carlota)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The estele sleet the milly. The milly is omnipotent. If someone coiffe the milly then the milly is livelong. If someone sleet the milly then they are cumulous. If someone is omnipotent and they need the estele then they eat the milly. If someone sleet the milly then they eat the estele. If someone is laureate and they eat the estele then they need the milly. If the milly coiffe the estele then the estele coiffe the milly. If the estele sleet the milly and the milly is omnipotent then the estele is laureate. If someone is livelong and they do not eat the estele then the estele rumba the milly. The estele coiffe the milly.", "logic": "\nSleet(estele, milly)\nOmnipotent(milly)\nforall x (Coiffe(x, milly) -> Livelong(milly))\nforall x (Sleet(x, milly) -> Cumulous(x))\nforall x (Omnipotent(x) and Coiffe(x, estele) -> Sleet(x, milly))\nforall x (Sleet(x, milly) -> Sleet(x, estele))\nforall x (Laureate(x) and Sleet(x, estele) -> Coiffe(x, milly))\nCoiffe(milly, estele) -> Coiffe(estele, milly)\nSleet(estele, milly) and Omnipotent(milly) -> Laureate(estele)\nforall x (Livelong(x) and not Sleet(x, estele) -> Rumba(estele, milly))\n\nCoiffe(estele, milly)\n\nSleet(estele, milly) and Omnipotent(milly) and Sleet(estele, milly) and Omnipotent(milly) -> Laureate(estele) -> therefore Laureate(estele) Sleet(estele, milly) and forall x (Sleet(x, milly) -> Sleet(x, estele)) -> therefore Sleet(estele, estele) Laureate(estele) and Sleet(estele, estele) and forall x (Laureate(x) and Sleet(x, estele) -> Coiffe(x, milly)) -> therefore Coiffe(estele, milly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The nicholle egress the rich. The rich is unshaved. If someone tolerate the rich then the rich is nonrigid. If someone egress the rich then they are yearly. If someone is unshaved and they need the nicholle then they eat the rich. If someone egress the rich then they eat the nicholle. If someone is unfeminine and they eat the nicholle then they need the rich. If the rich tolerate the nicholle then the nicholle tolerate the rich. If the nicholle egress the rich and the rich is unshaved then the nicholle is unfeminine. If someone is nonrigid and they do not eat the nicholle then the nicholle apostatize the rich. The nicholle does not need the rich.", "logic": "\nEgress(nicholle, rich)\nUnshaved(rich)\nforall x (Tolerate(x, rich) -> Nonrigid(rich))\nforall x (Egress(x, rich) -> Yearly(x))\nforall x (Unshaved(x) and Tolerate(x, nicholle) -> Egress(x, rich))\nforall x (Egress(x, rich) -> Egress(x, nicholle))\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) and Egress(x, nicholle) -> Tolerate(x, rich))\nTolerate(rich, nicholle) -> Tolerate(nicholle, rich)\nEgress(nicholle, rich) and Unshaved(rich) -> Unfeminine(nicholle)\nforall x (Nonrigid(x) and not Egress(x, nicholle) -> Apostatize(nicholle, rich))\n\nnot Tolerate(nicholle, rich)\n\nEgress(nicholle, rich) and Unshaved(rich) and Egress(nicholle, rich) and Unshaved(rich) -> Unfeminine(nicholle) -> therefore Unfeminine(nicholle) Egress(nicholle, rich) and forall x (Egress(x, rich) -> Egress(x, nicholle)) -> therefore Egress(nicholle, nicholle) Unfeminine(nicholle) and Egress(nicholle, nicholle) and forall x (Unfeminine(x) and Egress(x, nicholle) -> Tolerate(x, rich)) -> therefore Tolerate(nicholle, rich)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The kalvin succumb the octavia. The octavia is suggestive. If someone illuminate the octavia then the octavia is unsown. If someone succumb the octavia then they are staid. If someone is suggestive and they need the kalvin then they eat the octavia. If someone succumb the octavia then they eat the kalvin. If someone is partisan and they eat the kalvin then they need the octavia. If the octavia illuminate the kalvin then the kalvin illuminate the octavia. If the kalvin succumb the octavia and the octavia is suggestive then the kalvin is partisan. If someone is unsown and they do not eat the kalvin then the kalvin abrogate the octavia. The octavia is unsown.", "logic": "\nSuccumb(kalvin, octavia)\nSuggestive(octavia)\nforall x (Illuminate(x, octavia) -> Unsown(octavia))\nforall x (Succumb(x, octavia) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Suggestive(x) and Illuminate(x, kalvin) -> Succumb(x, octavia))\nforall x (Succumb(x, octavia) -> Succumb(x, kalvin))\nforall x (Partisan(x) and Succumb(x, kalvin) -> Illuminate(x, octavia))\nIlluminate(octavia, kalvin) -> Illuminate(kalvin, octavia)\nSuccumb(kalvin, octavia) and Suggestive(octavia) -> Partisan(kalvin)\nforall x (Unsown(x) and not Succumb(x, kalvin) -> Abrogate(kalvin, octavia))\n\nUnsown(octavia)\n\nSuccumb(kalvin, octavia) and Suggestive(octavia) and Succumb(kalvin, octavia) and Suggestive(octavia) -> Partisan(kalvin) -> therefore Partisan(kalvin) Succumb(kalvin, octavia) and forall x (Succumb(x, octavia) -> Succumb(x, kalvin)) -> therefore Succumb(kalvin, kalvin) Partisan(kalvin) and Succumb(kalvin, kalvin) and forall x (Partisan(x) and Succumb(x, kalvin) -> Illuminate(x, octavia)) -> therefore Illuminate(kalvin, octavia) Illuminate(kalvin, octavia) and forall x (Illuminate(x, octavia) -> Unsown(octavia)) -> therefore Unsown(octavia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The filip shelve the skipp. The skipp is naked. If someone grill the skipp then the skipp is bright. If someone shelve the skipp then they are credible. If someone is naked and they need the filip then they eat the skipp. If someone shelve the skipp then they eat the filip. If someone is limpid and they eat the filip then they need the skipp. If the skipp grill the filip then the filip grill the skipp. If the filip shelve the skipp and the skipp is naked then the filip is limpid. If someone is bright and they do not eat the filip then the filip advise the skipp. The skipp is not bright.", "logic": "\nShelve(filip, skipp)\nNaked(skipp)\nforall x (Grill(x, skipp) -> Bright(skipp))\nforall x (Shelve(x, skipp) -> Credible(x))\nforall x (Naked(x) and Grill(x, filip) -> Shelve(x, skipp))\nforall x (Shelve(x, skipp) -> Shelve(x, filip))\nforall x (Limpid(x) and Shelve(x, filip) -> Grill(x, skipp))\nGrill(skipp, filip) -> Grill(filip, skipp)\nShelve(filip, skipp) and Naked(skipp) -> Limpid(filip)\nforall x (Bright(x) and not Shelve(x, filip) -> Advise(filip, skipp))\n\nnot Bright(skipp)\n\nShelve(filip, skipp) and Naked(skipp) and Shelve(filip, skipp) and Naked(skipp) -> Limpid(filip) -> therefore Limpid(filip) Shelve(filip, skipp) and forall x (Shelve(x, skipp) -> Shelve(x, filip)) -> therefore Shelve(filip, filip) Limpid(filip) and Shelve(filip, filip) and forall x (Limpid(x) and Shelve(x, filip) -> Grill(x, skipp)) -> therefore Grill(filip, skipp) Grill(filip, skipp) and forall x (Grill(x, skipp) -> Bright(skipp)) -> therefore Bright(skipp)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The randi plead the felita. The felita is mycenaean. If someone emblazon the felita then the felita is abridged. If someone plead the felita then they are secretory. If someone is mycenaean and they need the randi then they eat the felita. If someone plead the felita then they eat the randi. If someone is embroiled and they eat the randi then they need the felita. If the felita emblazon the randi then the randi emblazon the felita. If the randi plead the felita and the felita is mycenaean then the randi is embroiled. If someone is abridged and they do not eat the randi then the randi disforest the felita. The felita does not eat the felita.", "logic": "\nPlead(randi, felita)\nMycenaean(felita)\nforall x (Emblazon(x, felita) -> Abridged(felita))\nforall x (Plead(x, felita) -> Secretory(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Emblazon(x, randi) -> Plead(x, felita))\nforall x (Plead(x, felita) -> Plead(x, randi))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and Plead(x, randi) -> Emblazon(x, felita))\nEmblazon(felita, randi) -> Emblazon(randi, felita)\nPlead(randi, felita) and Mycenaean(felita) -> Embroiled(randi)\nforall x (Abridged(x) and not Plead(x, randi) -> Disforest(randi, felita))\n\nnot Plead(felita, felita)\n\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Emblazon(x, randi) -> Plead(x, felita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The hildy syncretise the pasquale. The pasquale is washed. If someone schlep the pasquale then the pasquale is chaffy. If someone syncretise the pasquale then they are unwounded. If someone is washed and they need the hildy then they eat the pasquale. If someone syncretise the pasquale then they eat the hildy. If someone is purebred and they eat the hildy then they need the pasquale. If the pasquale schlep the hildy then the hildy schlep the pasquale. If the hildy syncretise the pasquale and the pasquale is washed then the hildy is purebred. If someone is chaffy and they do not eat the hildy then the hildy sharpshoot the pasquale. The pasquale schlep the pasquale.", "logic": "\nSyncretise(hildy, pasquale)\nWashed(pasquale)\nforall x (Schlep(x, pasquale) -> Chaffy(pasquale))\nforall x (Syncretise(x, pasquale) -> Unwounded(x))\nforall x (Washed(x) and Schlep(x, hildy) -> Syncretise(x, pasquale))\nforall x (Syncretise(x, pasquale) -> Syncretise(x, hildy))\nforall x (Purebred(x) and Syncretise(x, hildy) -> Schlep(x, pasquale))\nSchlep(pasquale, hildy) -> Schlep(hildy, pasquale)\nSyncretise(hildy, pasquale) and Washed(pasquale) -> Purebred(hildy)\nforall x (Chaffy(x) and not Syncretise(x, hildy) -> Sharpshoot(hildy, pasquale))\n\nSchlep(pasquale, pasquale)\n\nforall x (Purebred(x) and Syncretise(x, hildy) -> Schlep(x, pasquale)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The philbert blanket the dorelle. The dorelle is empyrean. If someone bacterize the dorelle then the dorelle is sapphirine. If someone blanket the dorelle then they are unbalanced. If someone is empyrean and they need the philbert then they eat the dorelle. If someone blanket the dorelle then they eat the philbert. If someone is uncial and they eat the philbert then they need the dorelle. If the dorelle bacterize the philbert then the philbert bacterize the dorelle. If the philbert blanket the dorelle and the dorelle is empyrean then the philbert is uncial. If someone is sapphirine and they do not eat the philbert then the philbert cinematise the dorelle. The dorelle does not eat the philbert.", "logic": "\nBlanket(philbert, dorelle)\nEmpyrean(dorelle)\nforall x (Bacterize(x, dorelle) -> Sapphirine(dorelle))\nforall x (Blanket(x, dorelle) -> Unbalanced(x))\nforall x (Empyrean(x) and Bacterize(x, philbert) -> Blanket(x, dorelle))\nforall x (Blanket(x, dorelle) -> Blanket(x, philbert))\nforall x (Uncial(x) and Blanket(x, philbert) -> Bacterize(x, dorelle))\nBacterize(dorelle, philbert) -> Bacterize(philbert, dorelle)\nBlanket(philbert, dorelle) and Empyrean(dorelle) -> Uncial(philbert)\nforall x (Sapphirine(x) and not Blanket(x, philbert) -> Cinematise(philbert, dorelle))\n\nnot Blanket(dorelle, philbert)\n\nforall x (Blanket(x, dorelle) -> Blanket(x, philbert)) <- forall x (Empyrean(x) and Bacterize(x, philbert) -> Blanket(x, dorelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The rusty march the laurance. The laurance is compelling. If someone crest the laurance then the laurance is lowest. If someone march the laurance then they are infatuated. If someone is compelling and they need the rusty then they eat the laurance. If someone march the laurance then they eat the rusty. If someone is ropey and they eat the rusty then they need the laurance. If the laurance crest the rusty then the rusty crest the laurance. If the rusty march the laurance and the laurance is compelling then the rusty is ropey. If someone is lowest and they do not eat the rusty then the rusty bunco the laurance. The rusty bunco the laurance.", "logic": "\nMarch(rusty, laurance)\nCompelling(laurance)\nforall x (Crest(x, laurance) -> Lowest(laurance))\nforall x (March(x, laurance) -> Infatuated(x))\nforall x (Compelling(x) and Crest(x, rusty) -> March(x, laurance))\nforall x (March(x, laurance) -> March(x, rusty))\nforall x (Ropey(x) and March(x, rusty) -> Crest(x, laurance))\nCrest(laurance, rusty) -> Crest(rusty, laurance)\nMarch(rusty, laurance) and Compelling(laurance) -> Ropey(rusty)\nforall x (Lowest(x) and not March(x, rusty) -> Bunco(rusty, laurance))\n\nBunco(rusty, laurance)\n\nforall x (Lowest(x) and not March(x, rusty) -> Bunco(rusty, laurance)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The tella blue the jannelle. The jannelle is perennial. If someone table the jannelle then the jannelle is kyphotic. If someone blue the jannelle then they are solidified. If someone is perennial and they need the tella then they eat the jannelle. If someone blue the jannelle then they eat the tella. If someone is doddery and they eat the tella then they need the jannelle. If the jannelle table the tella then the tella table the jannelle. If the tella blue the jannelle and the jannelle is perennial then the tella is doddery. If someone is kyphotic and they do not eat the tella then the tella observe the jannelle. The tella does not need the tella.", "logic": "\nBlue(tella, jannelle)\nPerennial(jannelle)\nforall x (Table(x, jannelle) -> Kyphotic(jannelle))\nforall x (Blue(x, jannelle) -> Solidified(x))\nforall x (Perennial(x) and Table(x, tella) -> Blue(x, jannelle))\nforall x (Blue(x, jannelle) -> Blue(x, tella))\nforall x (Doddery(x) and Blue(x, tella) -> Table(x, jannelle))\nTable(jannelle, tella) -> Table(tella, jannelle)\nBlue(tella, jannelle) and Perennial(jannelle) -> Doddery(tella)\nforall x (Kyphotic(x) and not Blue(x, tella) -> Observe(tella, jannelle))\n\nnot Table(tella, tella)\n\nnot Table(tella, tella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The sibylla incise the flossie. The flossie is emboldened. If someone chant the flossie then the flossie is microsomal. If someone incise the flossie then they are figured. If someone is emboldened and they need the sibylla then they eat the flossie. If someone incise the flossie then they eat the sibylla. If someone is mutinous and they eat the sibylla then they need the flossie. If the flossie chant the sibylla then the sibylla chant the flossie. If the sibylla incise the flossie and the flossie is emboldened then the sibylla is mutinous. If someone is microsomal and they do not eat the sibylla then the sibylla nasale the flossie. The flossie nasale the sibylla.", "logic": "\nIncise(sibylla, flossie)\nEmboldened(flossie)\nforall x (Chant(x, flossie) -> Microsomal(flossie))\nforall x (Incise(x, flossie) -> Figured(x))\nforall x (Emboldened(x) and Chant(x, sibylla) -> Incise(x, flossie))\nforall x (Incise(x, flossie) -> Incise(x, sibylla))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Incise(x, sibylla) -> Chant(x, flossie))\nChant(flossie, sibylla) -> Chant(sibylla, flossie)\nIncise(sibylla, flossie) and Emboldened(flossie) -> Mutinous(sibylla)\nforall x (Microsomal(x) and not Incise(x, sibylla) -> Nasale(sibylla, flossie))\n\nNasale(flossie, sibylla)\n\nNasale(flossie, sibylla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The salomone craze the stanton. The stanton is numidian. If someone indulge the stanton then the stanton is emotional. If someone craze the stanton then they are southmost. If someone is numidian and they need the salomone then they eat the stanton. If someone craze the stanton then they eat the salomone. If someone is damaging and they eat the salomone then they need the stanton. If the stanton indulge the salomone then the salomone indulge the stanton. If the salomone craze the stanton and the stanton is numidian then the salomone is damaging. If someone is emotional and they do not eat the salomone then the salomone glass the stanton. The stanton does not visit the stanton.", "logic": "\nCraze(salomone, stanton)\nNumidian(stanton)\nforall x (Indulge(x, stanton) -> Emotional(stanton))\nforall x (Craze(x, stanton) -> Southmost(x))\nforall x (Numidian(x) and Indulge(x, salomone) -> Craze(x, stanton))\nforall x (Craze(x, stanton) -> Craze(x, salomone))\nforall x (Damaging(x) and Craze(x, salomone) -> Indulge(x, stanton))\nIndulge(stanton, salomone) -> Indulge(salomone, stanton)\nCraze(salomone, stanton) and Numidian(stanton) -> Damaging(salomone)\nforall x (Emotional(x) and not Craze(x, salomone) -> Glass(salomone, stanton))\n\nnot Glass(stanton, stanton)\n\nnot Glass(stanton, stanton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The welbie animate the kass. The kass is silvern. If someone terrasse the kass then the kass is amylolytic. If someone animate the kass then they are homophile. If someone is silvern and they need the welbie then they eat the kass. If someone animate the kass then they eat the welbie. If someone is recyclable and they eat the welbie then they need the kass. If the kass terrasse the welbie then the welbie terrasse the kass. If the welbie animate the kass and the kass is silvern then the welbie is recyclable. If someone is amylolytic and they do not eat the welbie then the welbie confront the kass. The kass terrasse the welbie.", "logic": "\nAnimate(welbie, kass)\nSilvern(kass)\nforall x (Terrasse(x, kass) -> Amylolytic(kass))\nforall x (Animate(x, kass) -> Homophile(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) and Terrasse(x, welbie) -> Animate(x, kass))\nforall x (Animate(x, kass) -> Animate(x, welbie))\nforall x (Recyclable(x) and Animate(x, welbie) -> Terrasse(x, kass))\nTerrasse(kass, welbie) -> Terrasse(welbie, kass)\nAnimate(welbie, kass) and Silvern(kass) -> Recyclable(welbie)\nforall x (Amylolytic(x) and not Animate(x, welbie) -> Confront(welbie, kass))\n\nTerrasse(kass, welbie)\n\nTerrasse(kass, welbie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1454"} {"premises": "The fara kennel the brunella. The brunella worst the fara. The brunella does not visit the fara. If something outshine the fara then the fara worst the brunella. If something worst the brunella then it outshine the brunella. If something kennel the fara then it outshine the brunella. If something is idealized then it does not like the brunella. If the brunella worst the fara then the brunella outshine the fara. If something outshine the brunella and the brunella is not enhancive then the brunella worst the fara. If something outshine the fara then it kennel the brunella. If something outshine the brunella and it is not aeschylean then it worst the brunella. The fara kennel the brunella.", "logic": "\nKennel(fara, brunella)\nWorst(brunella, fara)\nnot Kennel(brunella, fara)\nforall x (Outshine(x, fara) -> Worst(fara, brunella))\nforall x (Worst(x, brunella) -> Outshine(x, brunella))\nforall x (Kennel(x, fara) -> Outshine(x, brunella))\nforall x (Idealized(x) -> not Outshine(x, brunella))\nWorst(brunella, fara) -> Outshine(brunella, fara)\nforall x (Outshine(x, brunella) and not Enhancive(brunella) -> Worst(brunella, fara))\nforall x (Outshine(x, fara) -> Kennel(x, brunella))\nforall x (Outshine(x, brunella) and not Aeschylean(x) -> Worst(x, brunella))\n\nKennel(fara, brunella)\n\ntherefore Kennel(fara, brunella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The sonya discount the chandler. The chandler avulse the sonya. The chandler does not visit the sonya. If something defang the sonya then the sonya avulse the chandler. If something avulse the chandler then it defang the chandler. If something discount the sonya then it defang the chandler. If something is caesural then it does not like the chandler. If the chandler avulse the sonya then the chandler defang the sonya. If something defang the chandler and the chandler is not shipshape then the chandler avulse the sonya. If something defang the sonya then it discount the chandler. If something defang the chandler and it is not unlovable then it avulse the chandler. The chandler discount the sonya.", "logic": "\nDiscount(sonya, chandler)\nAvulse(chandler, sonya)\nnot Discount(chandler, sonya)\nforall x (Defang(x, sonya) -> Avulse(sonya, chandler))\nforall x (Avulse(x, chandler) -> Defang(x, chandler))\nforall x (Discount(x, sonya) -> Defang(x, chandler))\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> not Defang(x, chandler))\nAvulse(chandler, sonya) -> Defang(chandler, sonya)\nforall x (Defang(x, chandler) and not Shipshape(chandler) -> Avulse(chandler, sonya))\nforall x (Defang(x, sonya) -> Discount(x, chandler))\nforall x (Defang(x, chandler) and not Unlovable(x) -> Avulse(x, chandler))\n\nDiscount(chandler, sonya)\n\ntherefore not Discount(chandler, sonya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The theada decay the ibby. The ibby smirch the theada. The ibby does not visit the theada. If something plant the theada then the theada smirch the ibby. If something smirch the ibby then it plant the ibby. If something decay the theada then it plant the ibby. If something is combatant then it does not like the ibby. If the ibby smirch the theada then the ibby plant the theada. If something plant the ibby and the ibby is not benzenoid then the ibby smirch the theada. If something plant the theada then it decay the ibby. If something plant the ibby and it is not burned then it smirch the ibby. The ibby plant the theada.", "logic": "\nDecay(theada, ibby)\nSmirch(ibby, theada)\nnot Decay(ibby, theada)\nforall x (Plant(x, theada) -> Smirch(theada, ibby))\nforall x (Smirch(x, ibby) -> Plant(x, ibby))\nforall x (Decay(x, theada) -> Plant(x, ibby))\nforall x (Combatant(x) -> not Plant(x, ibby))\nSmirch(ibby, theada) -> Plant(ibby, theada)\nforall x (Plant(x, ibby) and not Benzenoid(ibby) -> Smirch(ibby, theada))\nforall x (Plant(x, theada) -> Decay(x, ibby))\nforall x (Plant(x, ibby) and not Burned(x) -> Smirch(x, ibby))\n\nPlant(ibby, theada)\n\nSmirch(ibby, theada) and Smirch(ibby, theada) -> Plant(ibby, theada) -> therefore Plant(ibby, theada)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The hunt typecast the rheba. The rheba peal the hunt. The rheba does not visit the hunt. If something burnish the hunt then the hunt peal the rheba. If something peal the rheba then it burnish the rheba. If something typecast the hunt then it burnish the rheba. If something is orbiculate then it does not like the rheba. If the rheba peal the hunt then the rheba burnish the hunt. If something burnish the rheba and the rheba is not radiating then the rheba peal the hunt. If something burnish the hunt then it typecast the rheba. If something burnish the rheba and it is not atrophied then it peal the rheba. The rheba does not like the hunt.", "logic": "\nTypecast(hunt, rheba)\nPeal(rheba, hunt)\nnot Typecast(rheba, hunt)\nforall x (Burnish(x, hunt) -> Peal(hunt, rheba))\nforall x (Peal(x, rheba) -> Burnish(x, rheba))\nforall x (Typecast(x, hunt) -> Burnish(x, rheba))\nforall x (Orbiculate(x) -> not Burnish(x, rheba))\nPeal(rheba, hunt) -> Burnish(rheba, hunt)\nforall x (Burnish(x, rheba) and not Radiating(rheba) -> Peal(rheba, hunt))\nforall x (Burnish(x, hunt) -> Typecast(x, rheba))\nforall x (Burnish(x, rheba) and not Atrophied(x) -> Peal(x, rheba))\n\nnot Burnish(rheba, hunt)\n\nPeal(rheba, hunt) and Peal(rheba, hunt) -> Burnish(rheba, hunt) -> therefore Burnish(rheba, hunt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The amargo hatch the adrick. The adrick institute the amargo. The adrick does not visit the amargo. If something bugger the amargo then the amargo institute the adrick. If something institute the adrick then it bugger the adrick. If something hatch the amargo then it bugger the adrick. If something is accurst then it does not like the adrick. If the adrick institute the amargo then the adrick bugger the amargo. If something bugger the adrick and the adrick is not volitional then the adrick institute the amargo. If something bugger the amargo then it hatch the adrick. If something bugger the adrick and it is not mutinous then it institute the adrick. The adrick hatch the adrick.", "logic": "\nHatch(amargo, adrick)\nInstitute(adrick, amargo)\nnot Hatch(adrick, amargo)\nforall x (Bugger(x, amargo) -> Institute(amargo, adrick))\nforall x (Institute(x, adrick) -> Bugger(x, adrick))\nforall x (Hatch(x, amargo) -> Bugger(x, adrick))\nforall x (Accurst(x) -> not Bugger(x, adrick))\nInstitute(adrick, amargo) -> Bugger(adrick, amargo)\nforall x (Bugger(x, adrick) and not Volitional(adrick) -> Institute(adrick, amargo))\nforall x (Bugger(x, amargo) -> Hatch(x, adrick))\nforall x (Bugger(x, adrick) and not Mutinous(x) -> Institute(x, adrick))\n\nHatch(adrick, adrick)\n\nInstitute(adrick, amargo) and Institute(adrick, amargo) -> Bugger(adrick, amargo) -> therefore Bugger(adrick, amargo) Bugger(adrick, amargo) and forall x (Bugger(x, amargo) -> Hatch(x, adrick)) -> therefore Hatch(adrick, adrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The abigail disapprove the ruben. The ruben pother the abigail. The ruben does not visit the abigail. If something overdrive the abigail then the abigail pother the ruben. If something pother the ruben then it overdrive the ruben. If something disapprove the abigail then it overdrive the ruben. If something is papillose then it does not like the ruben. If the ruben pother the abigail then the ruben overdrive the abigail. If something overdrive the ruben and the ruben is not boney then the ruben pother the abigail. If something overdrive the abigail then it disapprove the ruben. If something overdrive the ruben and it is not surplus then it pother the ruben. The abigail does not need the ruben.", "logic": "\nDisapprove(abigail, ruben)\nPother(ruben, abigail)\nnot Disapprove(ruben, abigail)\nforall x (Overdrive(x, abigail) -> Pother(abigail, ruben))\nforall x (Pother(x, ruben) -> Overdrive(x, ruben))\nforall x (Disapprove(x, abigail) -> Overdrive(x, ruben))\nforall x (Papillose(x) -> not Overdrive(x, ruben))\nPother(ruben, abigail) -> Overdrive(ruben, abigail)\nforall x (Overdrive(x, ruben) and not Boney(ruben) -> Pother(ruben, abigail))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, abigail) -> Disapprove(x, ruben))\nforall x (Overdrive(x, ruben) and not Surplus(x) -> Pother(x, ruben))\n\nnot Pother(abigail, ruben)\n\nPother(ruben, abigail) and Pother(ruben, abigail) -> Overdrive(ruben, abigail) -> therefore Overdrive(ruben, abigail) Overdrive(ruben, abigail) and forall x (Overdrive(x, abigail) -> Pother(abigail, ruben)) -> therefore Pother(abigail, ruben)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The cordey baulk the dayle. The dayle mince the cordey. The dayle does not visit the cordey. If something sojourn the cordey then the cordey mince the dayle. If something mince the dayle then it sojourn the dayle. If something baulk the cordey then it sojourn the dayle. If something is ionic then it does not like the dayle. If the dayle mince the cordey then the dayle sojourn the cordey. If something sojourn the dayle and the dayle is not multicolor then the dayle mince the cordey. If something sojourn the cordey then it baulk the dayle. If something sojourn the dayle and it is not illusional then it mince the dayle. The cordey sojourn the dayle.", "logic": "\nBaulk(cordey, dayle)\nMince(dayle, cordey)\nnot Baulk(dayle, cordey)\nforall x (Sojourn(x, cordey) -> Mince(cordey, dayle))\nforall x (Mince(x, dayle) -> Sojourn(x, dayle))\nforall x (Baulk(x, cordey) -> Sojourn(x, dayle))\nforall x (Ionic(x) -> not Sojourn(x, dayle))\nMince(dayle, cordey) -> Sojourn(dayle, cordey)\nforall x (Sojourn(x, dayle) and not Multicolor(dayle) -> Mince(dayle, cordey))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, cordey) -> Baulk(x, dayle))\nforall x (Sojourn(x, dayle) and not Illusional(x) -> Mince(x, dayle))\n\nSojourn(cordey, dayle)\n\nMince(dayle, cordey) and Mince(dayle, cordey) -> Sojourn(dayle, cordey) -> therefore Sojourn(dayle, cordey) Sojourn(dayle, cordey) and forall x (Sojourn(x, cordey) -> Mince(cordey, dayle)) -> therefore Mince(cordey, dayle) Mince(cordey, dayle) and forall x (Mince(x, dayle) -> Sojourn(x, dayle)) -> therefore Sojourn(cordey, dayle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The rubia glissade the mariam. The mariam unionize the rubia. The mariam does not visit the rubia. If something distrain the rubia then the rubia unionize the mariam. If something unionize the mariam then it distrain the mariam. If something glissade the rubia then it distrain the mariam. If something is faceless then it does not like the mariam. If the mariam unionize the rubia then the mariam distrain the rubia. If something distrain the mariam and the mariam is not acceptable then the mariam unionize the rubia. If something distrain the rubia then it glissade the mariam. If something distrain the mariam and it is not doddery then it unionize the mariam. The rubia does not like the mariam.", "logic": "\nGlissade(rubia, mariam)\nUnionize(mariam, rubia)\nnot Glissade(mariam, rubia)\nforall x (Distrain(x, rubia) -> Unionize(rubia, mariam))\nforall x (Unionize(x, mariam) -> Distrain(x, mariam))\nforall x (Glissade(x, rubia) -> Distrain(x, mariam))\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> not Distrain(x, mariam))\nUnionize(mariam, rubia) -> Distrain(mariam, rubia)\nforall x (Distrain(x, mariam) and not Acceptable(mariam) -> Unionize(mariam, rubia))\nforall x (Distrain(x, rubia) -> Glissade(x, mariam))\nforall x (Distrain(x, mariam) and not Doddery(x) -> Unionize(x, mariam))\n\nnot Distrain(rubia, mariam)\n\nUnionize(mariam, rubia) and Unionize(mariam, rubia) -> Distrain(mariam, rubia) -> therefore Distrain(mariam, rubia) Distrain(mariam, rubia) and forall x (Distrain(x, rubia) -> Unionize(rubia, mariam)) -> therefore Unionize(rubia, mariam) Unionize(rubia, mariam) and forall x (Unionize(x, mariam) -> Distrain(x, mariam)) -> therefore Distrain(rubia, mariam)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The liuka insist the shaughn. The shaughn league the liuka. The shaughn does not visit the liuka. If something mediate the liuka then the liuka league the shaughn. If something league the shaughn then it mediate the shaughn. If something insist the liuka then it mediate the shaughn. If something is astonished then it does not like the shaughn. If the shaughn league the liuka then the shaughn mediate the liuka. If something mediate the shaughn and the shaughn is not capsular then the shaughn league the liuka. If something mediate the liuka then it insist the shaughn. If something mediate the shaughn and it is not parturient then it league the shaughn. The shaughn does not like the shaughn.", "logic": "\nInsist(liuka, shaughn)\nLeague(shaughn, liuka)\nnot Insist(shaughn, liuka)\nforall x (Mediate(x, liuka) -> League(liuka, shaughn))\nforall x (League(x, shaughn) -> Mediate(x, shaughn))\nforall x (Insist(x, liuka) -> Mediate(x, shaughn))\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> not Mediate(x, shaughn))\nLeague(shaughn, liuka) -> Mediate(shaughn, liuka)\nforall x (Mediate(x, shaughn) and not Capsular(shaughn) -> League(shaughn, liuka))\nforall x (Mediate(x, liuka) -> Insist(x, shaughn))\nforall x (Mediate(x, shaughn) and not Parturient(x) -> League(x, shaughn))\n\nnot Mediate(shaughn, shaughn)\n\nforall x (League(x, shaughn) -> Mediate(x, shaughn)) <- forall x (Mediate(x, shaughn) and not Parturient(x) -> League(x, shaughn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The flint disband the staffard. The staffard bosom the flint. The staffard does not visit the flint. If something reach the flint then the flint bosom the staffard. If something bosom the staffard then it reach the staffard. If something disband the flint then it reach the staffard. If something is voluble then it does not like the staffard. If the staffard bosom the flint then the staffard reach the flint. If something reach the staffard and the staffard is not yeasty then the staffard bosom the flint. If something reach the flint then it disband the staffard. If something reach the staffard and it is not depletable then it bosom the staffard. The staffard bosom the staffard.", "logic": "\nDisband(flint, staffard)\nBosom(staffard, flint)\nnot Disband(staffard, flint)\nforall x (Reach(x, flint) -> Bosom(flint, staffard))\nforall x (Bosom(x, staffard) -> Reach(x, staffard))\nforall x (Disband(x, flint) -> Reach(x, staffard))\nforall x (Voluble(x) -> not Reach(x, staffard))\nBosom(staffard, flint) -> Reach(staffard, flint)\nforall x (Reach(x, staffard) and not Yeasty(staffard) -> Bosom(staffard, flint))\nforall x (Reach(x, flint) -> Disband(x, staffard))\nforall x (Reach(x, staffard) and not Depletable(x) -> Bosom(x, staffard))\n\nBosom(staffard, staffard)\n\nforall x (Reach(x, staffard) and not Depletable(x) -> Bosom(x, staffard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The carree revamp the esmaria. The esmaria resurrect the carree. The esmaria does not visit the carree. If something nauseate the carree then the carree resurrect the esmaria. If something resurrect the esmaria then it nauseate the esmaria. If something revamp the carree then it nauseate the esmaria. If something is gratifying then it does not like the esmaria. If the esmaria resurrect the carree then the esmaria nauseate the carree. If something nauseate the esmaria and the esmaria is not paying then the esmaria resurrect the carree. If something nauseate the carree then it revamp the esmaria. If something nauseate the esmaria and it is not aboral then it resurrect the esmaria. The carree does not like the carree.", "logic": "\nRevamp(carree, esmaria)\nResurrect(esmaria, carree)\nnot Revamp(esmaria, carree)\nforall x (Nauseate(x, carree) -> Resurrect(carree, esmaria))\nforall x (Resurrect(x, esmaria) -> Nauseate(x, esmaria))\nforall x (Revamp(x, carree) -> Nauseate(x, esmaria))\nforall x (Gratifying(x) -> not Nauseate(x, esmaria))\nResurrect(esmaria, carree) -> Nauseate(esmaria, carree)\nforall x (Nauseate(x, esmaria) and not Paying(esmaria) -> Resurrect(esmaria, carree))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, carree) -> Revamp(x, esmaria))\nforall x (Nauseate(x, esmaria) and not Aboral(x) -> Resurrect(x, esmaria))\n\nnot Nauseate(carree, carree)\n\nnot Nauseate(carree, carree) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The suellen vacation the shanan. The shanan apologize the suellen. The shanan does not visit the suellen. If something moralise the suellen then the suellen apologize the shanan. If something apologize the shanan then it moralise the shanan. If something vacation the suellen then it moralise the shanan. If something is spinnbar then it does not like the shanan. If the shanan apologize the suellen then the shanan moralise the suellen. If something moralise the shanan and the shanan is not dainty then the shanan apologize the suellen. If something moralise the suellen then it vacation the shanan. If something moralise the shanan and it is not lifeless then it apologize the shanan. The shanan is dainty.", "logic": "\nVacation(suellen, shanan)\nApologize(shanan, suellen)\nnot Vacation(shanan, suellen)\nforall x (Moralise(x, suellen) -> Apologize(suellen, shanan))\nforall x (Apologize(x, shanan) -> Moralise(x, shanan))\nforall x (Vacation(x, suellen) -> Moralise(x, shanan))\nforall x (Spinnbar(x) -> not Moralise(x, shanan))\nApologize(shanan, suellen) -> Moralise(shanan, suellen)\nforall x (Moralise(x, shanan) and not Dainty(shanan) -> Apologize(shanan, suellen))\nforall x (Moralise(x, suellen) -> Vacation(x, shanan))\nforall x (Moralise(x, shanan) and not Lifeless(x) -> Apologize(x, shanan))\n\nDainty(shanan)\n\nDainty(shanan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The antonia answer the hetti. The hetti stanch the antonia. The hetti does not visit the antonia. If something honey the antonia then the antonia stanch the hetti. If something stanch the hetti then it honey the hetti. If something answer the antonia then it honey the hetti. If something is septal then it does not like the hetti. If the hetti stanch the antonia then the hetti honey the antonia. If something honey the hetti and the hetti is not receivable then the hetti stanch the antonia. If something honey the antonia then it answer the hetti. If something honey the hetti and it is not verbatim then it stanch the hetti. The antonia is not kind.", "logic": "\nAnswer(antonia, hetti)\nStanch(hetti, antonia)\nnot Answer(hetti, antonia)\nforall x (Honey(x, antonia) -> Stanch(antonia, hetti))\nforall x (Stanch(x, hetti) -> Honey(x, hetti))\nforall x (Answer(x, antonia) -> Honey(x, hetti))\nforall x (Septal(x) -> not Honey(x, hetti))\nStanch(hetti, antonia) -> Honey(hetti, antonia)\nforall x (Honey(x, hetti) and not Receivable(hetti) -> Stanch(hetti, antonia))\nforall x (Honey(x, antonia) -> Answer(x, hetti))\nforall x (Honey(x, hetti) and not Verbatim(x) -> Stanch(x, hetti))\n\nnot Kind(antonia)\n\nnot Kind(antonia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The annamaria lactate the murielle. The murielle fuse the annamaria. The murielle does not visit the annamaria. If something surprise the annamaria then the annamaria fuse the murielle. If something fuse the murielle then it surprise the murielle. If something lactate the annamaria then it surprise the murielle. If something is eatable then it does not like the murielle. If the murielle fuse the annamaria then the murielle surprise the annamaria. If something surprise the murielle and the murielle is not geodesic then the murielle fuse the annamaria. If something surprise the annamaria then it lactate the murielle. If something surprise the murielle and it is not fordable then it fuse the murielle. The annamaria fuse the annamaria.", "logic": "\nLactate(annamaria, murielle)\nFuse(murielle, annamaria)\nnot Lactate(murielle, annamaria)\nforall x (Surprise(x, annamaria) -> Fuse(annamaria, murielle))\nforall x (Fuse(x, murielle) -> Surprise(x, murielle))\nforall x (Lactate(x, annamaria) -> Surprise(x, murielle))\nforall x (Eatable(x) -> not Surprise(x, murielle))\nFuse(murielle, annamaria) -> Surprise(murielle, annamaria)\nforall x (Surprise(x, murielle) and not Geodesic(murielle) -> Fuse(murielle, annamaria))\nforall x (Surprise(x, annamaria) -> Lactate(x, murielle))\nforall x (Surprise(x, murielle) and not Fordable(x) -> Fuse(x, murielle))\n\nFuse(annamaria, annamaria)\n\nFuse(annamaria, annamaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The guillaume naturalise the merilyn. The merilyn title the guillaume. The merilyn does not visit the guillaume. If something defog the guillaume then the guillaume title the merilyn. If something title the merilyn then it defog the merilyn. If something naturalise the guillaume then it defog the merilyn. If something is revised then it does not like the merilyn. If the merilyn title the guillaume then the merilyn defog the guillaume. If something defog the merilyn and the merilyn is not beltlike then the merilyn title the guillaume. If something defog the guillaume then it naturalise the merilyn. If something defog the merilyn and it is not sloughy then it title the merilyn. The merilyn is not revised.", "logic": "\nNaturalise(guillaume, merilyn)\nTitle(merilyn, guillaume)\nnot Naturalise(merilyn, guillaume)\nforall x (Defog(x, guillaume) -> Title(guillaume, merilyn))\nforall x (Title(x, merilyn) -> Defog(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Naturalise(x, guillaume) -> Defog(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Revised(x) -> not Defog(x, merilyn))\nTitle(merilyn, guillaume) -> Defog(merilyn, guillaume)\nforall x (Defog(x, merilyn) and not Beltlike(merilyn) -> Title(merilyn, guillaume))\nforall x (Defog(x, guillaume) -> Naturalise(x, merilyn))\nforall x (Defog(x, merilyn) and not Sloughy(x) -> Title(x, merilyn))\n\nnot Revised(merilyn)\n\nnot Revised(merilyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The roosevelt dawn the juergen. The juergen underdress the roosevelt. The juergen does not visit the roosevelt. If something iodinate the roosevelt then the roosevelt underdress the juergen. If something underdress the juergen then it iodinate the juergen. If something dawn the roosevelt then it iodinate the juergen. If something is seemly then it does not like the juergen. If the juergen underdress the roosevelt then the juergen iodinate the roosevelt. If something iodinate the juergen and the juergen is not unratable then the juergen underdress the roosevelt. If something iodinate the roosevelt then it dawn the juergen. If something iodinate the juergen and it is not imperial then it underdress the juergen. The roosevelt dawn the roosevelt.", "logic": "\nDawn(roosevelt, juergen)\nUnderdress(juergen, roosevelt)\nnot Dawn(juergen, roosevelt)\nforall x (Iodinate(x, roosevelt) -> Underdress(roosevelt, juergen))\nforall x (Underdress(x, juergen) -> Iodinate(x, juergen))\nforall x (Dawn(x, roosevelt) -> Iodinate(x, juergen))\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> not Iodinate(x, juergen))\nUnderdress(juergen, roosevelt) -> Iodinate(juergen, roosevelt)\nforall x (Iodinate(x, juergen) and not Unratable(juergen) -> Underdress(juergen, roosevelt))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, roosevelt) -> Dawn(x, juergen))\nforall x (Iodinate(x, juergen) and not Imperial(x) -> Underdress(x, juergen))\n\nDawn(roosevelt, roosevelt)\n\nDawn(roosevelt, roosevelt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-133"} {"premises": "The janna nickel the oprah. The janna acidulate the valery. The janna is flexile. The janna subtitle the valery. The valery nickel the janna. The valery acidulate the janna. The valery acidulate the oprah. The valery is pending. The valery is flexile. The valery subtitle the janna. The oprah nickel the janna. The oprah acidulate the janna. The oprah acidulate the valery. The oprah is flexile. The oprah subtitle the janna. If the valery is flexile then the valery is bivariate. If someone subtitle the oprah and they need the janna then the oprah nickel the janna. If someone acidulate the janna then the janna is equipotent. The oprah subtitle the janna.", "logic": "\nNickel(janna, oprah)\nAcidulate(janna, valery)\nFlexile(janna)\nSubtitle(janna, valery)\nNickel(valery, janna)\nAcidulate(valery, janna)\nAcidulate(valery, oprah)\nPending(valery)\nFlexile(valery)\nSubtitle(valery, janna)\nNickel(oprah, janna)\nAcidulate(oprah, janna)\nAcidulate(oprah, valery)\nFlexile(oprah)\nSubtitle(oprah, janna)\nFlexile(valery) -> Bivariate(valery)\nforall x (Subtitle(x, oprah) and Subtitle(x, janna) -> Nickel(oprah, janna))\nforall x (Acidulate(x, janna) -> Equipotent(janna))\n\nSubtitle(oprah, janna)\n\ntherefore Subtitle(oprah, janna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "The kessiah ennoble the dafna. The kessiah defeminise the mellie. The kessiah is untrod. The kessiah strive the mellie. The mellie ennoble the kessiah. The mellie defeminise the kessiah. The mellie defeminise the dafna. The mellie is singsong. The mellie is untrod. The mellie strive the kessiah. The dafna ennoble the kessiah. The dafna defeminise the kessiah. The dafna defeminise the mellie. The dafna is untrod. The dafna strive the kessiah. If the mellie is untrod then the mellie is lactogenic. If someone strive the dafna and they need the kessiah then the dafna ennoble the kessiah. If someone defeminise the kessiah then the kessiah is coccal. The dafna is not untrod.", "logic": "\nEnnoble(kessiah, dafna)\nDefeminise(kessiah, mellie)\nUntrod(kessiah)\nStrive(kessiah, mellie)\nEnnoble(mellie, kessiah)\nDefeminise(mellie, kessiah)\nDefeminise(mellie, dafna)\nSingsong(mellie)\nUntrod(mellie)\nStrive(mellie, kessiah)\nEnnoble(dafna, kessiah)\nDefeminise(dafna, kessiah)\nDefeminise(dafna, mellie)\nUntrod(dafna)\nStrive(dafna, kessiah)\nUntrod(mellie) -> Lactogenic(mellie)\nforall x (Strive(x, dafna) and Strive(x, kessiah) -> Ennoble(dafna, kessiah))\nforall x (Defeminise(x, kessiah) -> Coccal(kessiah))\n\nnot Untrod(dafna)\n\ntherefore Untrod(dafna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "The luke localise the katinka. The luke blat the edgardo. The luke is pessimum. The luke crossbreed the edgardo. The edgardo localise the luke. The edgardo blat the luke. The edgardo blat the katinka. The edgardo is tripinnate. The edgardo is pessimum. The edgardo crossbreed the luke. The katinka localise the luke. The katinka blat the luke. The katinka blat the edgardo. The katinka is pessimum. The katinka crossbreed the luke. If the edgardo is pessimum then the edgardo is insectan. If someone crossbreed the katinka and they need the luke then the katinka localise the luke. If someone blat the luke then the luke is aligned. The edgardo is insectan.", "logic": "\nLocalise(luke, katinka)\nBlat(luke, edgardo)\nPessimum(luke)\nCrossbreed(luke, edgardo)\nLocalise(edgardo, luke)\nBlat(edgardo, luke)\nBlat(edgardo, katinka)\nTripinnate(edgardo)\nPessimum(edgardo)\nCrossbreed(edgardo, luke)\nLocalise(katinka, luke)\nBlat(katinka, luke)\nBlat(katinka, edgardo)\nPessimum(katinka)\nCrossbreed(katinka, luke)\nPessimum(edgardo) -> Insectan(edgardo)\nforall x (Crossbreed(x, katinka) and Crossbreed(x, luke) -> Localise(katinka, luke))\nforall x (Blat(x, luke) -> Aligned(luke))\n\nInsectan(edgardo)\n\nPessimum(edgardo) and Pessimum(edgardo) -> Insectan(edgardo) -> therefore Insectan(edgardo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "The jonas affiance the lonnie. The jonas trample the julienne. The jonas is skim. The jonas mean the julienne. The julienne affiance the jonas. The julienne trample the jonas. The julienne trample the lonnie. The julienne is orangish. The julienne is skim. The julienne mean the jonas. The lonnie affiance the jonas. The lonnie trample the jonas. The lonnie trample the julienne. The lonnie is skim. The lonnie mean the jonas. If the julienne is skim then the julienne is comburant. If someone mean the lonnie and they need the jonas then the lonnie affiance the jonas. If someone trample the jonas then the jonas is neuromotor. The julienne is not comburant.", "logic": "\nAffiance(jonas, lonnie)\nTrample(jonas, julienne)\nSkim(jonas)\nMean(jonas, julienne)\nAffiance(julienne, jonas)\nTrample(julienne, jonas)\nTrample(julienne, lonnie)\nOrangish(julienne)\nSkim(julienne)\nMean(julienne, jonas)\nAffiance(lonnie, jonas)\nTrample(lonnie, jonas)\nTrample(lonnie, julienne)\nSkim(lonnie)\nMean(lonnie, jonas)\nSkim(julienne) -> Comburant(julienne)\nforall x (Mean(x, lonnie) and Mean(x, jonas) -> Affiance(lonnie, jonas))\nforall x (Trample(x, jonas) -> Neuromotor(jonas))\n\nnot Comburant(julienne)\n\nSkim(julienne) and Skim(julienne) -> Comburant(julienne) -> therefore Comburant(julienne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "The malkah grade the gonzalo. The malkah transition the carolynn. The malkah is recessive. The malkah splay the carolynn. The carolynn grade the malkah. The carolynn transition the malkah. The carolynn transition the gonzalo. The carolynn is exogenic. The carolynn is recessive. The carolynn splay the malkah. The gonzalo grade the malkah. The gonzalo transition the malkah. The gonzalo transition the carolynn. The gonzalo is recessive. The gonzalo splay the malkah. If the carolynn is recessive then the carolynn is polyvalent. If someone splay the gonzalo and they need the malkah then the gonzalo grade the malkah. If someone transition the malkah then the malkah is highbrowed. The gonzalo does not eat the gonzalo.", "logic": "\nGrade(malkah, gonzalo)\nTransition(malkah, carolynn)\nRecessive(malkah)\nSplay(malkah, carolynn)\nGrade(carolynn, malkah)\nTransition(carolynn, malkah)\nTransition(carolynn, gonzalo)\nExogenic(carolynn)\nRecessive(carolynn)\nSplay(carolynn, malkah)\nGrade(gonzalo, malkah)\nTransition(gonzalo, malkah)\nTransition(gonzalo, carolynn)\nRecessive(gonzalo)\nSplay(gonzalo, malkah)\nRecessive(carolynn) -> Polyvalent(carolynn)\nforall x (Splay(x, gonzalo) and Splay(x, malkah) -> Grade(gonzalo, malkah))\nforall x (Transition(x, malkah) -> Highbrowed(malkah))\n\nnot Transition(gonzalo, gonzalo)\n\nnot Transition(gonzalo, gonzalo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "The rachel type the carlyn. The rachel repay the ingrid. The rachel is chivalrous. The rachel privilege the ingrid. The ingrid type the rachel. The ingrid repay the rachel. The ingrid repay the carlyn. The ingrid is risen. The ingrid is chivalrous. The ingrid privilege the rachel. The carlyn type the rachel. The carlyn repay the rachel. The carlyn repay the ingrid. The carlyn is chivalrous. The carlyn privilege the rachel. If the ingrid is chivalrous then the ingrid is blasting. If someone privilege the carlyn and they need the rachel then the carlyn type the rachel. If someone repay the rachel then the rachel is inheriting. The rachel privilege the carlyn.", "logic": "\nType(rachel, carlyn)\nRepay(rachel, ingrid)\nChivalrous(rachel)\nPrivilege(rachel, ingrid)\nType(ingrid, rachel)\nRepay(ingrid, rachel)\nRepay(ingrid, carlyn)\nRisen(ingrid)\nChivalrous(ingrid)\nPrivilege(ingrid, rachel)\nType(carlyn, rachel)\nRepay(carlyn, rachel)\nRepay(carlyn, ingrid)\nChivalrous(carlyn)\nPrivilege(carlyn, rachel)\nChivalrous(ingrid) -> Blasting(ingrid)\nforall x (Privilege(x, carlyn) and Privilege(x, rachel) -> Type(carlyn, rachel))\nforall x (Repay(x, rachel) -> Inheriting(rachel))\n\nPrivilege(rachel, carlyn)\n\nPrivilege(rachel, carlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "The madlen slave the bernadine. The madlen terrify the mara. The madlen is sporty. The madlen liberalize the mara. The mara slave the madlen. The mara terrify the madlen. The mara terrify the bernadine. The mara is brinded. The mara is sporty. The mara liberalize the madlen. The bernadine slave the madlen. The bernadine terrify the madlen. The bernadine terrify the mara. The bernadine is sporty. The bernadine liberalize the madlen. If the mara is sporty then the mara is enzootic. If someone liberalize the bernadine and they need the madlen then the bernadine slave the madlen. If someone terrify the madlen then the madlen is windup. The mara does not eat the mara.", "logic": "\nSlave(madlen, bernadine)\nTerrify(madlen, mara)\nSporty(madlen)\nLiberalize(madlen, mara)\nSlave(mara, madlen)\nTerrify(mara, madlen)\nTerrify(mara, bernadine)\nBrinded(mara)\nSporty(mara)\nLiberalize(mara, madlen)\nSlave(bernadine, madlen)\nTerrify(bernadine, madlen)\nTerrify(bernadine, mara)\nSporty(bernadine)\nLiberalize(bernadine, madlen)\nSporty(mara) -> Enzootic(mara)\nforall x (Liberalize(x, bernadine) and Liberalize(x, madlen) -> Slave(bernadine, madlen))\nforall x (Terrify(x, madlen) -> Windup(madlen))\n\nnot Terrify(mara, mara)\n\nnot Terrify(mara, mara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "The nerita shackle the grover. The nerita autotomize the lora. The nerita is vermiform. The nerita pollenate the lora. The lora shackle the nerita. The lora autotomize the nerita. The lora autotomize the grover. The lora is woven. The lora is vermiform. The lora pollenate the nerita. The grover shackle the nerita. The grover autotomize the nerita. The grover autotomize the lora. The grover is vermiform. The grover pollenate the nerita. If the lora is vermiform then the lora is tonic. If someone pollenate the grover and they need the nerita then the grover shackle the nerita. If someone autotomize the nerita then the nerita is nurturant. The lora shackle the lora.", "logic": "\nShackle(nerita, grover)\nAutotomize(nerita, lora)\nVermiform(nerita)\nPollenate(nerita, lora)\nShackle(lora, nerita)\nAutotomize(lora, nerita)\nAutotomize(lora, grover)\nWoven(lora)\nVermiform(lora)\nPollenate(lora, nerita)\nShackle(grover, nerita)\nAutotomize(grover, nerita)\nAutotomize(grover, lora)\nVermiform(grover)\nPollenate(grover, nerita)\nVermiform(lora) -> Tonic(lora)\nforall x (Pollenate(x, grover) and Pollenate(x, nerita) -> Shackle(grover, nerita))\nforall x (Autotomize(x, nerita) -> Nurturant(nerita))\n\nShackle(lora, lora)\n\nShackle(lora, lora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1759"} {"premises": "Ramonda is apraxic. Ramonda is cyrillic. Ramonda is operatic. Mike is redemptory. Mike is nosed. Mike is apraxic. Mike is not panoptical. Andria is redemptory. Andria is not quelled. Andria is nosed. Andria is not cyrillic. Andria is not operatic. If Andria is panoptical then Andria is quelled. If Ramonda is nosed and Ramonda is apraxic then Ramonda is panoptical. If something is operatic then it is nosed. Round things are nosed. Kind, panoptical things are redemptory. If something is panoptical and not nosed then it is redemptory. Andria is nosed.", "logic": "\nApraxic(ramonda)\nCyrillic(ramonda)\nOperatic(ramonda)\nRedemptory(mike)\nNosed(mike)\nApraxic(mike)\nnot Panoptical(mike)\nRedemptory(andria)\nnot Quelled(andria)\nNosed(andria)\nnot Cyrillic(andria)\nnot Operatic(andria)\nPanoptical(andria) -> Quelled(andria)\nNosed(ramonda) and Apraxic(ramonda) -> Panoptical(ramonda)\nforall x (Operatic(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Apraxic(x) and Panoptical(x) -> Redemptory(x))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) and not Nosed(x) -> Redemptory(x))\n\nNosed(andria)\n\ntherefore Nosed(andria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Koralle is coexisting. Koralle is statute. Koralle is unsorted. Marian is sterilized. Marian is domed. Marian is coexisting. Marian is not meningeal. Irina is sterilized. Irina is not unbeholden. Irina is domed. Irina is not statute. Irina is not unsorted. If Irina is meningeal then Irina is unbeholden. If Koralle is domed and Koralle is coexisting then Koralle is meningeal. If something is unsorted then it is domed. Round things are domed. Kind, meningeal things are sterilized. If something is meningeal and not domed then it is sterilized. Irina is not domed.", "logic": "\nCoexisting(koralle)\nStatute(koralle)\nUnsorted(koralle)\nSterilized(marian)\nDomed(marian)\nCoexisting(marian)\nnot Meningeal(marian)\nSterilized(irina)\nnot Unbeholden(irina)\nDomed(irina)\nnot Statute(irina)\nnot Unsorted(irina)\nMeningeal(irina) -> Unbeholden(irina)\nDomed(koralle) and Coexisting(koralle) -> Meningeal(koralle)\nforall x (Unsorted(x) -> Domed(x))\nforall x (Meningeal(x) -> Domed(x))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) and Meningeal(x) -> Sterilized(x))\nforall x (Meningeal(x) and not Domed(x) -> Sterilized(x))\n\nnot Domed(irina)\n\ntherefore Domed(irina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Poppy is lank. Poppy is hebridean. Poppy is rotund. Jillana is necessary. Jillana is oceanic. Jillana is lank. Jillana is not threatened. Charmane is necessary. Charmane is not adamantine. Charmane is oceanic. Charmane is not hebridean. Charmane is not rotund. If Charmane is threatened then Charmane is adamantine. If Poppy is oceanic and Poppy is lank then Poppy is threatened. If something is rotund then it is oceanic. Round things are oceanic. Kind, threatened things are necessary. If something is threatened and not oceanic then it is necessary. Poppy is oceanic.", "logic": "\nLank(poppy)\nHebridean(poppy)\nRotund(poppy)\nNecessary(jillana)\nOceanic(jillana)\nLank(jillana)\nnot Threatened(jillana)\nNecessary(charmane)\nnot Adamantine(charmane)\nOceanic(charmane)\nnot Hebridean(charmane)\nnot Rotund(charmane)\nThreatened(charmane) -> Adamantine(charmane)\nOceanic(poppy) and Lank(poppy) -> Threatened(poppy)\nforall x (Rotund(x) -> Oceanic(x))\nforall x (Threatened(x) -> Oceanic(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) and Threatened(x) -> Necessary(x))\nforall x (Threatened(x) and not Oceanic(x) -> Necessary(x))\n\nOceanic(poppy)\n\nRotund(poppy) and forall x (Rotund(x) -> Oceanic(x)) -> therefore Oceanic(poppy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Vachel is caring. Vachel is plutonian. Vachel is impassive. Christyna is pretorial. Christyna is lesser. Christyna is caring. Christyna is not fineable. Antonio is pretorial. Antonio is not beninese. Antonio is lesser. Antonio is not plutonian. Antonio is not impassive. If Antonio is fineable then Antonio is beninese. If Vachel is lesser and Vachel is caring then Vachel is fineable. If something is impassive then it is lesser. Round things are lesser. Kind, fineable things are pretorial. If something is fineable and not lesser then it is pretorial. Vachel is not lesser.", "logic": "\nCaring(vachel)\nPlutonian(vachel)\nImpassive(vachel)\nPretorial(christyna)\nLesser(christyna)\nCaring(christyna)\nnot Fineable(christyna)\nPretorial(antonio)\nnot Beninese(antonio)\nLesser(antonio)\nnot Plutonian(antonio)\nnot Impassive(antonio)\nFineable(antonio) -> Beninese(antonio)\nLesser(vachel) and Caring(vachel) -> Fineable(vachel)\nforall x (Impassive(x) -> Lesser(x))\nforall x (Fineable(x) -> Lesser(x))\nforall x (Caring(x) and Fineable(x) -> Pretorial(x))\nforall x (Fineable(x) and not Lesser(x) -> Pretorial(x))\n\nnot Lesser(vachel)\n\nImpassive(vachel) and forall x (Impassive(x) -> Lesser(x)) -> therefore Lesser(vachel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Tharen is sweeping. Tharen is unimagined. Tharen is campanular. Amelina is ammoniac. Amelina is acrogenous. Amelina is sweeping. Amelina is not motorial. Anna is ammoniac. Anna is not native. Anna is acrogenous. Anna is not unimagined. Anna is not campanular. If Anna is motorial then Anna is native. If Tharen is acrogenous and Tharen is sweeping then Tharen is motorial. If something is campanular then it is acrogenous. Round things are acrogenous. Kind, motorial things are ammoniac. If something is motorial and not acrogenous then it is ammoniac. Tharen is motorial.", "logic": "\nSweeping(tharen)\nUnimagined(tharen)\nCampanular(tharen)\nAmmoniac(amelina)\nAcrogenous(amelina)\nSweeping(amelina)\nnot Motorial(amelina)\nAmmoniac(anna)\nnot Native(anna)\nAcrogenous(anna)\nnot Unimagined(anna)\nnot Campanular(anna)\nMotorial(anna) -> Native(anna)\nAcrogenous(tharen) and Sweeping(tharen) -> Motorial(tharen)\nforall x (Campanular(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nforall x (Motorial(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nforall x (Sweeping(x) and Motorial(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\nforall x (Motorial(x) and not Acrogenous(x) -> Ammoniac(x))\n\nMotorial(tharen)\n\nCampanular(tharen) and forall x (Campanular(x) -> Acrogenous(x)) -> therefore Acrogenous(tharen) Acrogenous(tharen) and Sweeping(tharen) and Acrogenous(tharen) and Sweeping(tharen) -> Motorial(tharen) -> therefore Motorial(tharen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Barrett is narrowed. Barrett is eccentric. Barrett is unpowered. Raymund is unsolved. Raymund is matured. Raymund is narrowed. Raymund is not known. Jojo is unsolved. Jojo is not palpable. Jojo is matured. Jojo is not eccentric. Jojo is not unpowered. If Jojo is known then Jojo is palpable. If Barrett is matured and Barrett is narrowed then Barrett is known. If something is unpowered then it is matured. Round things are matured. Kind, known things are unsolved. If something is known and not matured then it is unsolved. Barrett is not known.", "logic": "\nNarrowed(barrett)\nEccentric(barrett)\nUnpowered(barrett)\nUnsolved(raymund)\nMatured(raymund)\nNarrowed(raymund)\nnot Known(raymund)\nUnsolved(jojo)\nnot Palpable(jojo)\nMatured(jojo)\nnot Eccentric(jojo)\nnot Unpowered(jojo)\nKnown(jojo) -> Palpable(jojo)\nMatured(barrett) and Narrowed(barrett) -> Known(barrett)\nforall x (Unpowered(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Known(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Narrowed(x) and Known(x) -> Unsolved(x))\nforall x (Known(x) and not Matured(x) -> Unsolved(x))\n\nnot Known(barrett)\n\nUnpowered(barrett) and forall x (Unpowered(x) -> Matured(x)) -> therefore Matured(barrett) Matured(barrett) and Narrowed(barrett) and Matured(barrett) and Narrowed(barrett) -> Known(barrett) -> therefore Known(barrett)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Michel is clxv. Michel is roofed. Michel is bicornuate. Ainslee is certified. Ainslee is hyperopic. Ainslee is clxv. Ainslee is not rational. Emyle is certified. Emyle is not mated. Emyle is hyperopic. Emyle is not roofed. Emyle is not bicornuate. If Emyle is rational then Emyle is mated. If Michel is hyperopic and Michel is clxv then Michel is rational. If something is bicornuate then it is hyperopic. Round things are hyperopic. Kind, rational things are certified. If something is rational and not hyperopic then it is certified. Michel is certified.", "logic": "\nClxv(michel)\nRoofed(michel)\nBicornuate(michel)\nCertified(ainslee)\nHyperopic(ainslee)\nClxv(ainslee)\nnot Rational(ainslee)\nCertified(emyle)\nnot Mated(emyle)\nHyperopic(emyle)\nnot Roofed(emyle)\nnot Bicornuate(emyle)\nRational(emyle) -> Mated(emyle)\nHyperopic(michel) and Clxv(michel) -> Rational(michel)\nforall x (Bicornuate(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Rational(x) -> Hyperopic(x))\nforall x (Clxv(x) and Rational(x) -> Certified(x))\nforall x (Rational(x) and not Hyperopic(x) -> Certified(x))\n\nCertified(michel)\n\nBicornuate(michel) and forall x (Bicornuate(x) -> Hyperopic(x)) -> therefore Hyperopic(michel) Hyperopic(michel) and Clxv(michel) and Hyperopic(michel) and Clxv(michel) -> Rational(michel) -> therefore Rational(michel) Clxv(michel) and Rational(michel) and forall x (Clxv(x) and Rational(x) -> Certified(x)) -> therefore Certified(michel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Hew is noduled. Hew is weather. Hew is unaccented. Viki is apologetic. Viki is uniform. Viki is noduled. Viki is not chewy. Sidonnie is apologetic. Sidonnie is not plenteous. Sidonnie is uniform. Sidonnie is not weather. Sidonnie is not unaccented. If Sidonnie is chewy then Sidonnie is plenteous. If Hew is uniform and Hew is noduled then Hew is chewy. If something is unaccented then it is uniform. Round things are uniform. Kind, chewy things are apologetic. If something is chewy and not uniform then it is apologetic. Hew is not apologetic.", "logic": "\nNoduled(hew)\nWeather(hew)\nUnaccented(hew)\nApologetic(viki)\nUniform(viki)\nNoduled(viki)\nnot Chewy(viki)\nApologetic(sidonnie)\nnot Plenteous(sidonnie)\nUniform(sidonnie)\nnot Weather(sidonnie)\nnot Unaccented(sidonnie)\nChewy(sidonnie) -> Plenteous(sidonnie)\nUniform(hew) and Noduled(hew) -> Chewy(hew)\nforall x (Unaccented(x) -> Uniform(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) -> Uniform(x))\nforall x (Noduled(x) and Chewy(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Chewy(x) and not Uniform(x) -> Apologetic(x))\n\nnot Apologetic(hew)\n\nUnaccented(hew) and forall x (Unaccented(x) -> Uniform(x)) -> therefore Uniform(hew) Uniform(hew) and Noduled(hew) and Uniform(hew) and Noduled(hew) -> Chewy(hew) -> therefore Chewy(hew) Noduled(hew) and Chewy(hew) and forall x (Noduled(x) and Chewy(x) -> Apologetic(x)) -> therefore Apologetic(hew)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Gelya is unshod. Gelya is awakened. Gelya is coated. Elspeth is choral. Elspeth is incased. Elspeth is unshod. Elspeth is not humanlike. Isa is choral. Isa is not texan. Isa is incased. Isa is not awakened. Isa is not coated. If Isa is humanlike then Isa is texan. If Gelya is incased and Gelya is unshod then Gelya is humanlike. If something is coated then it is incased. Round things are incased. Kind, humanlike things are choral. If something is humanlike and not incased then it is choral. Elspeth is not awakened.", "logic": "\nUnshod(gelya)\nAwakened(gelya)\nCoated(gelya)\nChoral(elspeth)\nIncased(elspeth)\nUnshod(elspeth)\nnot Humanlike(elspeth)\nChoral(isa)\nnot Texan(isa)\nIncased(isa)\nnot Awakened(isa)\nnot Coated(isa)\nHumanlike(isa) -> Texan(isa)\nIncased(gelya) and Unshod(gelya) -> Humanlike(gelya)\nforall x (Coated(x) -> Incased(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) -> Incased(x))\nforall x (Unshod(x) and Humanlike(x) -> Choral(x))\nforall x (Humanlike(x) and not Incased(x) -> Choral(x))\n\nnot Awakened(elspeth)\n\nnot Awakened(elspeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Davin is cuneal. Davin is parched. Davin is tympanitic. Kerstin is neighborly. Kerstin is annulated. Kerstin is cuneal. Kerstin is not perfidious. Viviene is neighborly. Viviene is not numidian. Viviene is annulated. Viviene is not parched. Viviene is not tympanitic. If Viviene is perfidious then Viviene is numidian. If Davin is annulated and Davin is cuneal then Davin is perfidious. If something is tympanitic then it is annulated. Round things are annulated. Kind, perfidious things are neighborly. If something is perfidious and not annulated then it is neighborly. Viviene is perfidious.", "logic": "\nCuneal(davin)\nParched(davin)\nTympanitic(davin)\nNeighborly(kerstin)\nAnnulated(kerstin)\nCuneal(kerstin)\nnot Perfidious(kerstin)\nNeighborly(viviene)\nnot Numidian(viviene)\nAnnulated(viviene)\nnot Parched(viviene)\nnot Tympanitic(viviene)\nPerfidious(viviene) -> Numidian(viviene)\nAnnulated(davin) and Cuneal(davin) -> Perfidious(davin)\nforall x (Tympanitic(x) -> Annulated(x))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) -> Annulated(x))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) and Perfidious(x) -> Neighborly(x))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) and not Annulated(x) -> Neighborly(x))\n\nPerfidious(viviene)\n\nPerfidious(viviene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Betta is osmotic. Betta is glutted. Betta is bardic. Sullivan is simplistic. Sullivan is jawless. Sullivan is osmotic. Sullivan is not oppositive. Jean is simplistic. Jean is not vasomotor. Jean is jawless. Jean is not glutted. Jean is not bardic. If Jean is oppositive then Jean is vasomotor. If Betta is jawless and Betta is osmotic then Betta is oppositive. If something is bardic then it is jawless. Round things are jawless. Kind, oppositive things are simplistic. If something is oppositive and not jawless then it is simplistic. Jean is not osmotic.", "logic": "\nOsmotic(betta)\nGlutted(betta)\nBardic(betta)\nSimplistic(sullivan)\nJawless(sullivan)\nOsmotic(sullivan)\nnot Oppositive(sullivan)\nSimplistic(jean)\nnot Vasomotor(jean)\nJawless(jean)\nnot Glutted(jean)\nnot Bardic(jean)\nOppositive(jean) -> Vasomotor(jean)\nJawless(betta) and Osmotic(betta) -> Oppositive(betta)\nforall x (Bardic(x) -> Jawless(x))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) -> Jawless(x))\nforall x (Osmotic(x) and Oppositive(x) -> Simplistic(x))\nforall x (Oppositive(x) and not Jawless(x) -> Simplistic(x))\n\nnot Osmotic(jean)\n\nnot Osmotic(jean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Jack is subsurface. Jack is unawed. Jack is tenured. Selle is select. Selle is loyal. Selle is subsurface. Selle is not austral. Saxon is select. Saxon is not pyrectic. Saxon is loyal. Saxon is not unawed. Saxon is not tenured. If Saxon is austral then Saxon is pyrectic. If Jack is loyal and Jack is subsurface then Jack is austral. If something is tenured then it is loyal. Round things are loyal. Kind, austral things are select. If something is austral and not loyal then it is select. Jack is pyrectic.", "logic": "\nSubsurface(jack)\nUnawed(jack)\nTenured(jack)\nSelect(selle)\nLoyal(selle)\nSubsurface(selle)\nnot Austral(selle)\nSelect(saxon)\nnot Pyrectic(saxon)\nLoyal(saxon)\nnot Unawed(saxon)\nnot Tenured(saxon)\nAustral(saxon) -> Pyrectic(saxon)\nLoyal(jack) and Subsurface(jack) -> Austral(jack)\nforall x (Tenured(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Subsurface(x) and Austral(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Austral(x) and not Loyal(x) -> Select(x))\n\nPyrectic(jack)\n\nPyrectic(jack) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Delora is unlabeled. Delora is moonlike. Delora is apolitical. Shurwood is mint. Shurwood is feigned. Shurwood is unlabeled. Shurwood is not exculpated. Illa is mint. Illa is not untreated. Illa is feigned. Illa is not moonlike. Illa is not apolitical. If Illa is exculpated then Illa is untreated. If Delora is feigned and Delora is unlabeled then Delora is exculpated. If something is apolitical then it is feigned. Round things are feigned. Kind, exculpated things are mint. If something is exculpated and not feigned then it is mint. Shurwood is not apolitical.", "logic": "\nUnlabeled(delora)\nMoonlike(delora)\nApolitical(delora)\nMint(shurwood)\nFeigned(shurwood)\nUnlabeled(shurwood)\nnot Exculpated(shurwood)\nMint(illa)\nnot Untreated(illa)\nFeigned(illa)\nnot Moonlike(illa)\nnot Apolitical(illa)\nExculpated(illa) -> Untreated(illa)\nFeigned(delora) and Unlabeled(delora) -> Exculpated(delora)\nforall x (Apolitical(x) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) -> Feigned(x))\nforall x (Unlabeled(x) and Exculpated(x) -> Mint(x))\nforall x (Exculpated(x) and not Feigned(x) -> Mint(x))\n\nnot Apolitical(shurwood)\n\nnot Apolitical(shurwood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Glory is ungual. Glory is chian. Glory is adaptable. Ragnhild is kantian. Ragnhild is sightless. Ragnhild is ungual. Ragnhild is not swift. Scotti is kantian. Scotti is not splay. Scotti is sightless. Scotti is not chian. Scotti is not adaptable. If Scotti is swift then Scotti is splay. If Glory is sightless and Glory is ungual then Glory is swift. If something is adaptable then it is sightless. Round things are sightless. Kind, swift things are kantian. If something is swift and not sightless then it is kantian. Ragnhild is splay.", "logic": "\nUngual(glory)\nChian(glory)\nAdaptable(glory)\nKantian(ragnhild)\nSightless(ragnhild)\nUngual(ragnhild)\nnot Swift(ragnhild)\nKantian(scotti)\nnot Splay(scotti)\nSightless(scotti)\nnot Chian(scotti)\nnot Adaptable(scotti)\nSwift(scotti) -> Splay(scotti)\nSightless(glory) and Ungual(glory) -> Swift(glory)\nforall x (Adaptable(x) -> Sightless(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) -> Sightless(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) and Swift(x) -> Kantian(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) and not Sightless(x) -> Kantian(x))\n\nSplay(ragnhild)\n\nSplay(ragnhild) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-912"} {"premises": "Clayborne is whitened. Munroe is uninspired. Paola is uninspired. Walton is apogamous. Young things are animistic. If something is whitened then it is biaxal. If something is biaxal then it is casteless. Munroe is uninspired.", "logic": "\nWhitened(clayborne)\nUninspired(munroe)\nUninspired(paola)\nApogamous(walton)\nforall x (Casteless(x) -> Animistic(x))\nforall x (Whitened(x) -> Biaxal(x))\nforall x (Biaxal(x) -> Casteless(x))\n\nUninspired(munroe)\n\ntherefore Uninspired(munroe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Dino is radical. Apollo is larval. Rex is larval. Tomi is juxtaposed. Young things are dour. If something is radical then it is delirious. If something is delirious then it is flecked. Tomi is not juxtaposed.", "logic": "\nRadical(dino)\nLarval(apollo)\nLarval(rex)\nJuxtaposed(tomi)\nforall x (Flecked(x) -> Dour(x))\nforall x (Radical(x) -> Delirious(x))\nforall x (Delirious(x) -> Flecked(x))\n\nnot Juxtaposed(tomi)\n\ntherefore Juxtaposed(tomi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Dari is nicaean. Barrie is twinkling. Calvin is twinkling. Freddie is supporting. Young things are bushed. If something is nicaean then it is sibyllic. If something is sibyllic then it is unfunny. Dari is sibyllic.", "logic": "\nNicaean(dari)\nTwinkling(barrie)\nTwinkling(calvin)\nSupporting(freddie)\nforall x (Unfunny(x) -> Bushed(x))\nforall x (Nicaean(x) -> Sibyllic(x))\nforall x (Sibyllic(x) -> Unfunny(x))\n\nSibyllic(dari)\n\nNicaean(dari) and forall x (Nicaean(x) -> Sibyllic(x)) -> therefore Sibyllic(dari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Mady is brasslike. Tito is bothered. Orsa is bothered. Cameo is flecked. Young things are cliquish. If something is brasslike then it is deictic. If something is deictic then it is bigeminal. Mady is not deictic.", "logic": "\nBrasslike(mady)\nBothered(tito)\nBothered(orsa)\nFlecked(cameo)\nforall x (Bigeminal(x) -> Cliquish(x))\nforall x (Brasslike(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Deictic(x) -> Bigeminal(x))\n\nnot Deictic(mady)\n\nBrasslike(mady) and forall x (Brasslike(x) -> Deictic(x)) -> therefore Deictic(mady)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Jilleen is nonsocial. Glenn is premedical. Zorah is premedical. Silvio is logical. Young things are fuzzed. If something is nonsocial then it is ghanaian. If something is ghanaian then it is nonmodern. Jilleen is nonmodern.", "logic": "\nNonsocial(jilleen)\nPremedical(glenn)\nPremedical(zorah)\nLogical(silvio)\nforall x (Nonmodern(x) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Nonsocial(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\nforall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Nonmodern(x))\n\nNonmodern(jilleen)\n\nNonsocial(jilleen) and forall x (Nonsocial(x) -> Ghanaian(x)) -> therefore Ghanaian(jilleen) Ghanaian(jilleen) and forall x (Ghanaian(x) -> Nonmodern(x)) -> therefore Nonmodern(jilleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Berget is shoddy. Shanon is viatical. Arther is viatical. Loni is breezy. Young things are plebeian. If something is shoddy then it is infertile. If something is infertile then it is biaxial. Berget is not biaxial.", "logic": "\nShoddy(berget)\nViatical(shanon)\nViatical(arther)\nBreezy(loni)\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Plebeian(x))\nforall x (Shoddy(x) -> Infertile(x))\nforall x (Infertile(x) -> Biaxial(x))\n\nnot Biaxial(berget)\n\nShoddy(berget) and forall x (Shoddy(x) -> Infertile(x)) -> therefore Infertile(berget) Infertile(berget) and forall x (Infertile(x) -> Biaxial(x)) -> therefore Biaxial(berget)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Elnora is puzzled. Sarajane is listed. Ranee is listed. Collie is hemic. Young things are bobtail. If something is puzzled then it is salty. If something is salty then it is precursory. Elnora is bobtail.", "logic": "\nPuzzled(elnora)\nListed(sarajane)\nListed(ranee)\nHemic(collie)\nforall x (Precursory(x) -> Bobtail(x))\nforall x (Puzzled(x) -> Salty(x))\nforall x (Salty(x) -> Precursory(x))\n\nBobtail(elnora)\n\nPuzzled(elnora) and forall x (Puzzled(x) -> Salty(x)) -> therefore Salty(elnora) Salty(elnora) and forall x (Salty(x) -> Precursory(x)) -> therefore Precursory(elnora) Precursory(elnora) and forall x (Precursory(x) -> Bobtail(x)) -> therefore Bobtail(elnora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Blanca is unpackaged. Darcie is miasmal. Basia is miasmal. Westbrook is seventieth. Young things are sonorous. If something is unpackaged then it is dotty. If something is dotty then it is tiring. Blanca is not sonorous.", "logic": "\nUnpackaged(blanca)\nMiasmal(darcie)\nMiasmal(basia)\nSeventieth(westbrook)\nforall x (Tiring(x) -> Sonorous(x))\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Dotty(x))\nforall x (Dotty(x) -> Tiring(x))\n\nnot Sonorous(blanca)\n\nUnpackaged(blanca) and forall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Dotty(x)) -> therefore Dotty(blanca) Dotty(blanca) and forall x (Dotty(x) -> Tiring(x)) -> therefore Tiring(blanca) Tiring(blanca) and forall x (Tiring(x) -> Sonorous(x)) -> therefore Sonorous(blanca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Dwaine is unfueled. Broderick is unfettered. Ermina is unfettered. Felita is blasting. Young things are consolable. If something is unfueled then it is biographic. If something is biographic then it is botonee. Felita is not consolable.", "logic": "\nUnfueled(dwaine)\nUnfettered(broderick)\nUnfettered(ermina)\nBlasting(felita)\nforall x (Botonee(x) -> Consolable(x))\nforall x (Unfueled(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Botonee(x))\n\nnot Consolable(felita)\n\nforall x (Botonee(x) -> Consolable(x)) <- forall x (Biographic(x) -> Botonee(x)) <- forall x (Unfueled(x) -> Biographic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Danyelle is aerophilic. Delbert is inward. Vanda is inward. Dorette is biogenetic. Young things are associate. If something is aerophilic then it is cambodian. If something is cambodian then it is beaked. Delbert is cambodian.", "logic": "\nAerophilic(danyelle)\nInward(delbert)\nInward(vanda)\nBiogenetic(dorette)\nforall x (Beaked(x) -> Associate(x))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) -> Beaked(x))\n\nCambodian(delbert)\n\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) -> Cambodian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Meagan is isotonic. Aili is crippled. Penni is crippled. See is crinkled. Young things are boughed. If something is isotonic then it is none. If something is none then it is nodulated. Penni is not boughed.", "logic": "\nIsotonic(meagan)\nCrippled(aili)\nCrippled(penni)\nCrinkled(see)\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Boughed(x))\nforall x (Isotonic(x) -> None(x))\nforall x (None(x) -> Nodulated(x))\n\nnot Boughed(penni)\n\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Boughed(x)) <- forall x (None(x) -> Nodulated(x)) <- forall x (Isotonic(x) -> None(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Emylee is bracteal. Sherry is rank. Tracey is rank. Lynnet is defined. Young things are hunted. If something is bracteal then it is clear. If something is clear then it is fanciful. Sherry is fanciful.", "logic": "\nBracteal(emylee)\nRank(sherry)\nRank(tracey)\nDefined(lynnet)\nforall x (Fanciful(x) -> Hunted(x))\nforall x (Bracteal(x) -> Clear(x))\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Fanciful(x))\n\nFanciful(sherry)\n\nforall x (Clear(x) -> Fanciful(x)) <- forall x (Bracteal(x) -> Clear(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Krysta is earthlike. Karoline is acquainted. Kia is acquainted. Liorah is bathyal. Young things are phylliform. If something is earthlike then it is visionary. If something is visionary then it is phallic. Kia is not earthlike.", "logic": "\nEarthlike(krysta)\nAcquainted(karoline)\nAcquainted(kia)\nBathyal(liorah)\nforall x (Phallic(x) -> Phylliform(x))\nforall x (Earthlike(x) -> Visionary(x))\nforall x (Visionary(x) -> Phallic(x))\n\nnot Earthlike(kia)\n\nnot Earthlike(kia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Brittney is unedifying. Mirna is partible. Teri is partible. Wang is romantic. Young things are bipedal. If something is unedifying then it is cumulous. If something is cumulous then it is enclosed. Wang is partible.", "logic": "\nUnedifying(brittney)\nPartible(mirna)\nPartible(teri)\nRomantic(wang)\nforall x (Enclosed(x) -> Bipedal(x))\nforall x (Unedifying(x) -> Cumulous(x))\nforall x (Cumulous(x) -> Enclosed(x))\n\nPartible(wang)\n\nPartible(wang) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Cecilia is unerect. Spence is topping. Hetti is topping. Aveline is slain. Young things are nigh. If something is unerect then it is wired. If something is wired then it is incurable. Aveline is not quiet.", "logic": "\nUnerect(cecilia)\nTopping(spence)\nTopping(hetti)\nSlain(aveline)\nforall x (Incurable(x) -> Nigh(x))\nforall x (Unerect(x) -> Wired(x))\nforall x (Wired(x) -> Incurable(x))\n\nnot Quiet(aveline)\n\nnot Quiet(aveline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Jen is purging. Herschel is untwisted. Inez is untwisted. Hilliard is unapparent. Young things are ubiquitous. If something is purging then it is bonny. If something is bonny then it is cumulous. Herschel is quiet.", "logic": "\nPurging(jen)\nUntwisted(herschel)\nUntwisted(inez)\nUnapparent(hilliard)\nforall x (Cumulous(x) -> Ubiquitous(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Bonny(x))\nforall x (Bonny(x) -> Cumulous(x))\n\nQuiet(herschel)\n\nQuiet(herschel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-471"} {"premises": "Bianca is unpolished. Doralin is arching. Doralin is accursed. If Doralin is dizygous then Doralin is faveolate. If something is dizygous then it is unpolished. If something is arching then it is unpolished. If something is arching and faveolate then it is cankerous. Blue things are dizygous. If something is faveolate then it is accursed. Doralin is arching.", "logic": "\nUnpolished(bianca)\nArching(doralin)\nAccursed(doralin)\nDizygous(doralin) -> Faveolate(doralin)\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Unpolished(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Unpolished(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) and Faveolate(x) -> Cankerous(x))\nforall x (Arching(x) -> Dizygous(x))\nforall x (Faveolate(x) -> Accursed(x))\n\nArching(doralin)\n\ntherefore Arching(doralin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Collie is ecological. Ursuline is seaward. Ursuline is ventral. If Ursuline is politic then Ursuline is duckbill. If something is politic then it is ecological. If something is seaward then it is ecological. If something is seaward and duckbill then it is underbred. Blue things are politic. If something is duckbill then it is ventral. Ursuline is not seaward.", "logic": "\nEcological(collie)\nSeaward(ursuline)\nVentral(ursuline)\nPolitic(ursuline) -> Duckbill(ursuline)\nforall x (Politic(x) -> Ecological(x))\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Ecological(x))\nforall x (Seaward(x) and Duckbill(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Seaward(x) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Duckbill(x) -> Ventral(x))\n\nnot Seaward(ursuline)\n\ntherefore Seaward(ursuline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Sampson is pissed. Nigel is blackened. Nigel is mansard. If Nigel is toothless then Nigel is ectopic. If something is toothless then it is pissed. If something is blackened then it is pissed. If something is blackened and ectopic then it is historical. Blue things are toothless. If something is ectopic then it is mansard. Nigel is pissed.", "logic": "\nPissed(sampson)\nBlackened(nigel)\nMansard(nigel)\nToothless(nigel) -> Ectopic(nigel)\nforall x (Toothless(x) -> Pissed(x))\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Pissed(x))\nforall x (Blackened(x) and Ectopic(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Blackened(x) -> Toothless(x))\nforall x (Ectopic(x) -> Mansard(x))\n\nPissed(nigel)\n\nBlackened(nigel) and forall x (Blackened(x) -> Pissed(x)) -> therefore Pissed(nigel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Edgar is alary. Tiffany is onetime. Tiffany is marbleized. If Tiffany is nonprofit then Tiffany is runcinate. If something is nonprofit then it is alary. If something is onetime then it is alary. If something is onetime and runcinate then it is nonviolent. Blue things are nonprofit. If something is runcinate then it is marbleized. Tiffany is not alary.", "logic": "\nAlary(edgar)\nOnetime(tiffany)\nMarbleized(tiffany)\nNonprofit(tiffany) -> Runcinate(tiffany)\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) -> Alary(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Alary(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) and Runcinate(x) -> Nonviolent(x))\nforall x (Onetime(x) -> Nonprofit(x))\nforall x (Runcinate(x) -> Marbleized(x))\n\nnot Alary(tiffany)\n\nOnetime(tiffany) and forall x (Onetime(x) -> Alary(x)) -> therefore Alary(tiffany)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Chandal is bespoke. Emanuela is lawful. Emanuela is privileged. If Emanuela is coastal then Emanuela is liturgical. If something is coastal then it is bespoke. If something is lawful then it is bespoke. If something is lawful and liturgical then it is bronchitic. Blue things are coastal. If something is liturgical then it is privileged. Emanuela is liturgical.", "logic": "\nBespoke(chandal)\nLawful(emanuela)\nPrivileged(emanuela)\nCoastal(emanuela) -> Liturgical(emanuela)\nforall x (Coastal(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> Bespoke(x))\nforall x (Lawful(x) and Liturgical(x) -> Bronchitic(x))\nforall x (Lawful(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) -> Privileged(x))\n\nLiturgical(emanuela)\n\nLawful(emanuela) and forall x (Lawful(x) -> Coastal(x)) -> therefore Coastal(emanuela) Coastal(emanuela) and Coastal(emanuela) -> Liturgical(emanuela) -> therefore Liturgical(emanuela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Valera is delayed. Kellsie is epitheliod. Kellsie is unexpected. If Kellsie is straw then Kellsie is bronzy. If something is straw then it is delayed. If something is epitheliod then it is delayed. If something is epitheliod and bronzy then it is impuissant. Blue things are straw. If something is bronzy then it is unexpected. Kellsie is not bronzy.", "logic": "\nDelayed(valera)\nEpitheliod(kellsie)\nUnexpected(kellsie)\nStraw(kellsie) -> Bronzy(kellsie)\nforall x (Straw(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Delayed(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) and Bronzy(x) -> Impuissant(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Straw(x))\nforall x (Bronzy(x) -> Unexpected(x))\n\nnot Bronzy(kellsie)\n\nEpitheliod(kellsie) and forall x (Epitheliod(x) -> Straw(x)) -> therefore Straw(kellsie) Straw(kellsie) and Straw(kellsie) -> Bronzy(kellsie) -> therefore Bronzy(kellsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Skyler is precocious. Moina is proximate. Moina is axial. If Moina is unmingled then Moina is mature. If something is unmingled then it is precocious. If something is proximate then it is precocious. If something is proximate and mature then it is classified. Blue things are unmingled. If something is mature then it is axial. Moina is classified.", "logic": "\nPrecocious(skyler)\nProximate(moina)\nAxial(moina)\nUnmingled(moina) -> Mature(moina)\nforall x (Unmingled(x) -> Precocious(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Precocious(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) and Mature(x) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Proximate(x) -> Unmingled(x))\nforall x (Mature(x) -> Axial(x))\n\nClassified(moina)\n\nProximate(moina) and forall x (Proximate(x) -> Unmingled(x)) -> therefore Unmingled(moina) Unmingled(moina) and Unmingled(moina) -> Mature(moina) -> therefore Mature(moina) Proximate(moina) and Mature(moina) and forall x (Proximate(x) and Mature(x) -> Classified(x)) -> therefore Classified(moina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Marco is retired. Meridith is acropetal. Meridith is prepaid. If Meridith is chiliastic then Meridith is wondrous. If something is chiliastic then it is retired. If something is acropetal then it is retired. If something is acropetal and wondrous then it is apodeictic. Blue things are chiliastic. If something is wondrous then it is prepaid. Meridith is not apodeictic.", "logic": "\nRetired(marco)\nAcropetal(meridith)\nPrepaid(meridith)\nChiliastic(meridith) -> Wondrous(meridith)\nforall x (Chiliastic(x) -> Retired(x))\nforall x (Acropetal(x) -> Retired(x))\nforall x (Acropetal(x) and Wondrous(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Acropetal(x) -> Chiliastic(x))\nforall x (Wondrous(x) -> Prepaid(x))\n\nnot Apodeictic(meridith)\n\nAcropetal(meridith) and forall x (Acropetal(x) -> Chiliastic(x)) -> therefore Chiliastic(meridith) Chiliastic(meridith) and Chiliastic(meridith) -> Wondrous(meridith) -> therefore Wondrous(meridith) Acropetal(meridith) and Wondrous(meridith) and forall x (Acropetal(x) and Wondrous(x) -> Apodeictic(x)) -> therefore Apodeictic(meridith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Gen is xliv. Sheldon is deluxe. Sheldon is lost. If Sheldon is hortatory then Sheldon is toughened. If something is hortatory then it is xliv. If something is deluxe then it is xliv. If something is deluxe and toughened then it is perplexed. Blue things are hortatory. If something is toughened then it is lost. Gen is not hortatory.", "logic": "\nXliv(gen)\nDeluxe(sheldon)\nLost(sheldon)\nHortatory(sheldon) -> Toughened(sheldon)\nforall x (Hortatory(x) -> Xliv(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) -> Xliv(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) and Toughened(x) -> Perplexed(x))\nforall x (Deluxe(x) -> Hortatory(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Lost(x))\n\nnot Hortatory(gen)\n\nforall x (Deluxe(x) -> Hortatory(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Steffi is rawboned. Grove is aerobic. Grove is palatine. If Grove is jolty then Grove is chambered. If something is jolty then it is rawboned. If something is aerobic then it is rawboned. If something is aerobic and chambered then it is thirsty. Blue things are jolty. If something is chambered then it is palatine. Steffi is thirsty.", "logic": "\nRawboned(steffi)\nAerobic(grove)\nPalatine(grove)\nJolty(grove) -> Chambered(grove)\nforall x (Jolty(x) -> Rawboned(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Rawboned(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) and Chambered(x) -> Thirsty(x))\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Jolty(x))\nforall x (Chambered(x) -> Palatine(x))\n\nThirsty(steffi)\n\nforall x (Aerobic(x) and Chambered(x) -> Thirsty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Dulcine is fettered. Sibeal is tenacious. Sibeal is weak. If Sibeal is springy then Sibeal is botswanan. If something is springy then it is fettered. If something is tenacious then it is fettered. If something is tenacious and botswanan then it is piercing. Blue things are springy. If something is botswanan then it is weak. Dulcine is not weak.", "logic": "\nFettered(dulcine)\nTenacious(sibeal)\nWeak(sibeal)\nSpringy(sibeal) -> Botswanan(sibeal)\nforall x (Springy(x) -> Fettered(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Fettered(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) and Botswanan(x) -> Piercing(x))\nforall x (Tenacious(x) -> Springy(x))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Weak(x))\n\nnot Weak(dulcine)\n\nforall x (Botswanan(x) -> Weak(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Tedman is ashy. Esmaria is unbeaten. Esmaria is smudgy. If Esmaria is plaintive then Esmaria is spousal. If something is plaintive then it is ashy. If something is unbeaten then it is ashy. If something is unbeaten and spousal then it is valued. Blue things are plaintive. If something is spousal then it is smudgy. Esmaria is quiet.", "logic": "\nAshy(tedman)\nUnbeaten(esmaria)\nSmudgy(esmaria)\nPlaintive(esmaria) -> Spousal(esmaria)\nforall x (Plaintive(x) -> Ashy(x))\nforall x (Unbeaten(x) -> Ashy(x))\nforall x (Unbeaten(x) and Spousal(x) -> Valued(x))\nforall x (Unbeaten(x) -> Plaintive(x))\nforall x (Spousal(x) -> Smudgy(x))\n\nQuiet(esmaria)\n\nQuiet(esmaria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Tabbi is restrained. Paulina is diametric. Paulina is asterisked. If Paulina is lousy then Paulina is afghan. If something is lousy then it is restrained. If something is diametric then it is restrained. If something is diametric and afghan then it is excitant. Blue things are lousy. If something is afghan then it is asterisked. Tabbi is not diametric.", "logic": "\nRestrained(tabbi)\nDiametric(paulina)\nAsterisked(paulina)\nLousy(paulina) -> Afghan(paulina)\nforall x (Lousy(x) -> Restrained(x))\nforall x (Diametric(x) -> Restrained(x))\nforall x (Diametric(x) and Afghan(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Diametric(x) -> Lousy(x))\nforall x (Afghan(x) -> Asterisked(x))\n\nnot Diametric(tabbi)\n\nnot Diametric(tabbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "Weylin is bespoken. Hyacinth is decorative. Hyacinth is ungarbed. If Hyacinth is sneering then Hyacinth is middlemost. If something is sneering then it is bespoken. If something is decorative then it is bespoken. If something is decorative and middlemost then it is scummy. Blue things are sneering. If something is middlemost then it is ungarbed. Weylin is quiet.", "logic": "\nBespoken(weylin)\nDecorative(hyacinth)\nUngarbed(hyacinth)\nSneering(hyacinth) -> Middlemost(hyacinth)\nforall x (Sneering(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Decorative(x) -> Bespoken(x))\nforall x (Decorative(x) and Middlemost(x) -> Scummy(x))\nforall x (Decorative(x) -> Sneering(x))\nforall x (Middlemost(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\n\nQuiet(weylin)\n\nQuiet(weylin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The ford biodegrade the kathleen. The ford breed the kathleen. The kathleen is mitigable. The kathleen breed the karlene. The karlene biodegrade the ford. The karlene biodegrade the glenda. The karlene is araceous. The karlene is mitigable. The karlene is sinitic. The karlene breed the glenda. The glenda biodegrade the ford. The glenda is cranial. The glenda breed the ford. The glenda does not like the karlene. The glenda does not need the karlene. If something is mitigable then it entice the glenda. If something entice the glenda then it is sinitic. Round things are coltish. If the kathleen does not chase the karlene and the kathleen does not need the karlene then the kathleen is not mitigable. If the kathleen breed the ford then the kathleen does not need the ford. If something breed the ford then the ford entice the glenda. If the kathleen is cranial and the kathleen does not chase the glenda then the glenda is not cranial. If the karlene does not need the glenda then the glenda biodegrade the karlene. The karlene is araceous.", "logic": "\nBiodegrade(ford, kathleen)\nBreed(ford, kathleen)\nMitigable(kathleen)\nBreed(kathleen, karlene)\nBiodegrade(karlene, ford)\nBiodegrade(karlene, glenda)\nAraceous(karlene)\nMitigable(karlene)\nSinitic(karlene)\nBreed(karlene, glenda)\nBiodegrade(glenda, ford)\nCranial(glenda)\nBreed(glenda, ford)\nnot Breed(glenda, karlene)\nnot Entice(glenda, karlene)\nforall x (Mitigable(x) -> Entice(x, glenda))\nforall x (Entice(x, glenda) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Coltish(x))\nnot Biodegrade(kathleen, karlene) and not Entice(kathleen, karlene) -> not Mitigable(kathleen)\nBreed(kathleen, ford) -> not Entice(kathleen, ford)\nforall x (Breed(x, ford) -> Entice(ford, glenda))\nCranial(kathleen) and not Biodegrade(kathleen, glenda) -> not Cranial(glenda)\nnot Entice(karlene, glenda) -> Biodegrade(glenda, karlene)\n\nAraceous(karlene)\n\ntherefore Araceous(karlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The clemens condense the ange. The clemens crick the ange. The ange is dragging. The ange crick the chiquita. The chiquita condense the clemens. The chiquita condense the darsie. The chiquita is loving. The chiquita is dragging. The chiquita is incurved. The chiquita crick the darsie. The darsie condense the clemens. The darsie is augean. The darsie crick the clemens. The darsie does not like the chiquita. The darsie does not need the chiquita. If something is dragging then it regroup the darsie. If something regroup the darsie then it is incurved. Round things are bombastic. If the ange does not chase the chiquita and the ange does not need the chiquita then the ange is not dragging. If the ange crick the clemens then the ange does not need the clemens. If something crick the clemens then the clemens regroup the darsie. If the ange is augean and the ange does not chase the darsie then the darsie is not augean. If the chiquita does not need the darsie then the darsie condense the chiquita. The ange does not like the chiquita.", "logic": "\nCondense(clemens, ange)\nCrick(clemens, ange)\nDragging(ange)\nCrick(ange, chiquita)\nCondense(chiquita, clemens)\nCondense(chiquita, darsie)\nLoving(chiquita)\nDragging(chiquita)\nIncurved(chiquita)\nCrick(chiquita, darsie)\nCondense(darsie, clemens)\nAugean(darsie)\nCrick(darsie, clemens)\nnot Crick(darsie, chiquita)\nnot Regroup(darsie, chiquita)\nforall x (Dragging(x) -> Regroup(x, darsie))\nforall x (Regroup(x, darsie) -> Incurved(x))\nforall x (Incurved(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nnot Condense(ange, chiquita) and not Regroup(ange, chiquita) -> not Dragging(ange)\nCrick(ange, clemens) -> not Regroup(ange, clemens)\nforall x (Crick(x, clemens) -> Regroup(clemens, darsie))\nAugean(ange) and not Condense(ange, darsie) -> not Augean(darsie)\nnot Regroup(chiquita, darsie) -> Condense(darsie, chiquita)\n\nnot Crick(ange, chiquita)\n\ntherefore Crick(ange, chiquita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The sigmund broach the evey. The sigmund print the evey. The evey is struggling. The evey print the chiquita. The chiquita broach the sigmund. The chiquita broach the antonia. The chiquita is apodous. The chiquita is struggling. The chiquita is pneumonic. The chiquita print the antonia. The antonia broach the sigmund. The antonia is spumy. The antonia print the sigmund. The antonia does not like the chiquita. The antonia does not need the chiquita. If something is struggling then it mapquest the antonia. If something mapquest the antonia then it is pneumonic. Round things are allowable. If the evey does not chase the chiquita and the evey does not need the chiquita then the evey is not struggling. If the evey print the sigmund then the evey does not need the sigmund. If something print the sigmund then the sigmund mapquest the antonia. If the evey is spumy and the evey does not chase the antonia then the antonia is not spumy. If the chiquita does not need the antonia then the antonia broach the chiquita. The chiquita mapquest the antonia.", "logic": "\nBroach(sigmund, evey)\nPrint(sigmund, evey)\nStruggling(evey)\nPrint(evey, chiquita)\nBroach(chiquita, sigmund)\nBroach(chiquita, antonia)\nApodous(chiquita)\nStruggling(chiquita)\nPneumonic(chiquita)\nPrint(chiquita, antonia)\nBroach(antonia, sigmund)\nSpumy(antonia)\nPrint(antonia, sigmund)\nnot Print(antonia, chiquita)\nnot Mapquest(antonia, chiquita)\nforall x (Struggling(x) -> Mapquest(x, antonia))\nforall x (Mapquest(x, antonia) -> Pneumonic(x))\nforall x (Pneumonic(x) -> Allowable(x))\nnot Broach(evey, chiquita) and not Mapquest(evey, chiquita) -> not Struggling(evey)\nPrint(evey, sigmund) -> not Mapquest(evey, sigmund)\nforall x (Print(x, sigmund) -> Mapquest(sigmund, antonia))\nSpumy(evey) and not Broach(evey, antonia) -> not Spumy(antonia)\nnot Mapquest(chiquita, antonia) -> Broach(antonia, chiquita)\n\nMapquest(chiquita, antonia)\n\nStruggling(chiquita) and forall x (Struggling(x) -> Mapquest(x, antonia)) -> therefore Mapquest(chiquita, antonia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The donn outrank the viviana. The donn allegorize the viviana. The viviana is tenebrous. The viviana allegorize the auguste. The auguste outrank the donn. The auguste outrank the nell. The auguste is voluptuary. The auguste is tenebrous. The auguste is eucaryotic. The auguste allegorize the nell. The nell outrank the donn. The nell is stearic. The nell allegorize the donn. The nell does not like the auguste. The nell does not need the auguste. If something is tenebrous then it mutilate the nell. If something mutilate the nell then it is eucaryotic. Round things are blae. If the viviana does not chase the auguste and the viviana does not need the auguste then the viviana is not tenebrous. If the viviana allegorize the donn then the viviana does not need the donn. If something allegorize the donn then the donn mutilate the nell. If the viviana is stearic and the viviana does not chase the nell then the nell is not stearic. If the auguste does not need the nell then the nell outrank the auguste. The auguste does not need the nell.", "logic": "\nOutrank(donn, viviana)\nAllegorize(donn, viviana)\nTenebrous(viviana)\nAllegorize(viviana, auguste)\nOutrank(auguste, donn)\nOutrank(auguste, nell)\nVoluptuary(auguste)\nTenebrous(auguste)\nEucaryotic(auguste)\nAllegorize(auguste, nell)\nOutrank(nell, donn)\nStearic(nell)\nAllegorize(nell, donn)\nnot Allegorize(nell, auguste)\nnot Mutilate(nell, auguste)\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Mutilate(x, nell))\nforall x (Mutilate(x, nell) -> Eucaryotic(x))\nforall x (Eucaryotic(x) -> Blae(x))\nnot Outrank(viviana, auguste) and not Mutilate(viviana, auguste) -> not Tenebrous(viviana)\nAllegorize(viviana, donn) -> not Mutilate(viviana, donn)\nforall x (Allegorize(x, donn) -> Mutilate(donn, nell))\nStearic(viviana) and not Outrank(viviana, nell) -> not Stearic(nell)\nnot Mutilate(auguste, nell) -> Outrank(nell, auguste)\n\nnot Mutilate(auguste, nell)\n\nTenebrous(auguste) and forall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Mutilate(x, nell)) -> therefore Mutilate(auguste, nell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The kissiah true the mahesh. The kissiah dissect the mahesh. The mahesh is deathless. The mahesh dissect the marillin. The marillin true the kissiah. The marillin true the gerhardt. The marillin is orbitual. The marillin is deathless. The marillin is lactating. The marillin dissect the gerhardt. The gerhardt true the kissiah. The gerhardt is alvine. The gerhardt dissect the kissiah. The gerhardt does not like the marillin. The gerhardt does not need the marillin. If something is deathless then it theorize the gerhardt. If something theorize the gerhardt then it is lactating. Round things are tyrannic. If the mahesh does not chase the marillin and the mahesh does not need the marillin then the mahesh is not deathless. If the mahesh dissect the kissiah then the mahesh does not need the kissiah. If something dissect the kissiah then the kissiah theorize the gerhardt. If the mahesh is alvine and the mahesh does not chase the gerhardt then the gerhardt is not alvine. If the marillin does not need the gerhardt then the gerhardt true the marillin. The mahesh is lactating.", "logic": "\nTrue(kissiah, mahesh)\nDissect(kissiah, mahesh)\nDeathless(mahesh)\nDissect(mahesh, marillin)\nTrue(marillin, kissiah)\nTrue(marillin, gerhardt)\nOrbitual(marillin)\nDeathless(marillin)\nLactating(marillin)\nDissect(marillin, gerhardt)\nTrue(gerhardt, kissiah)\nAlvine(gerhardt)\nDissect(gerhardt, kissiah)\nnot Dissect(gerhardt, marillin)\nnot Theorize(gerhardt, marillin)\nforall x (Deathless(x) -> Theorize(x, gerhardt))\nforall x (Theorize(x, gerhardt) -> Lactating(x))\nforall x (Lactating(x) -> Tyrannic(x))\nnot True(mahesh, marillin) and not Theorize(mahesh, marillin) -> not Deathless(mahesh)\nDissect(mahesh, kissiah) -> not Theorize(mahesh, kissiah)\nforall x (Dissect(x, kissiah) -> Theorize(kissiah, gerhardt))\nAlvine(mahesh) and not True(mahesh, gerhardt) -> not Alvine(gerhardt)\nnot Theorize(marillin, gerhardt) -> True(gerhardt, marillin)\n\nLactating(mahesh)\n\nDeathless(mahesh) and forall x (Deathless(x) -> Theorize(x, gerhardt)) -> therefore Theorize(mahesh, gerhardt) Theorize(mahesh, gerhardt) and forall x (Theorize(x, gerhardt) -> Lactating(x)) -> therefore Lactating(mahesh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The gabbey postpone the shirlee. The gabbey blare the shirlee. The shirlee is tributary. The shirlee blare the sigfrid. The sigfrid postpone the gabbey. The sigfrid postpone the floris. The sigfrid is sombre. The sigfrid is tributary. The sigfrid is victimised. The sigfrid blare the floris. The floris postpone the gabbey. The floris is untested. The floris blare the gabbey. The floris does not like the sigfrid. The floris does not need the sigfrid. If something is tributary then it ingrain the floris. If something ingrain the floris then it is victimised. Round things are elysian. If the shirlee does not chase the sigfrid and the shirlee does not need the sigfrid then the shirlee is not tributary. If the shirlee blare the gabbey then the shirlee does not need the gabbey. If something blare the gabbey then the gabbey ingrain the floris. If the shirlee is untested and the shirlee does not chase the floris then the floris is not untested. If the sigfrid does not need the floris then the floris postpone the sigfrid. The gabbey is not victimised.", "logic": "\nPostpone(gabbey, shirlee)\nBlare(gabbey, shirlee)\nTributary(shirlee)\nBlare(shirlee, sigfrid)\nPostpone(sigfrid, gabbey)\nPostpone(sigfrid, floris)\nSombre(sigfrid)\nTributary(sigfrid)\nVictimised(sigfrid)\nBlare(sigfrid, floris)\nPostpone(floris, gabbey)\nUntested(floris)\nBlare(floris, gabbey)\nnot Blare(floris, sigfrid)\nnot Ingrain(floris, sigfrid)\nforall x (Tributary(x) -> Ingrain(x, floris))\nforall x (Ingrain(x, floris) -> Victimised(x))\nforall x (Victimised(x) -> Elysian(x))\nnot Postpone(shirlee, sigfrid) and not Ingrain(shirlee, sigfrid) -> not Tributary(shirlee)\nBlare(shirlee, gabbey) -> not Ingrain(shirlee, gabbey)\nforall x (Blare(x, gabbey) -> Ingrain(gabbey, floris))\nUntested(shirlee) and not Postpone(shirlee, floris) -> not Untested(floris)\nnot Ingrain(sigfrid, floris) -> Postpone(floris, sigfrid)\n\nnot Victimised(gabbey)\n\nBlare(floris, gabbey) and forall x (Blare(x, gabbey) -> Ingrain(gabbey, floris)) -> therefore Ingrain(gabbey, floris) Ingrain(gabbey, floris) and forall x (Ingrain(x, floris) -> Victimised(x)) -> therefore Victimised(gabbey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The stormie sonnet the rosario. The stormie frap the rosario. The rosario is cosmogonic. The rosario frap the catlee. The catlee sonnet the stormie. The catlee sonnet the somerset. The catlee is complacent. The catlee is cosmogonic. The catlee is hidden. The catlee frap the somerset. The somerset sonnet the stormie. The somerset is sheeplike. The somerset frap the stormie. The somerset does not like the catlee. The somerset does not need the catlee. If something is cosmogonic then it negate the somerset. If something negate the somerset then it is hidden. Round things are surpliced. If the rosario does not chase the catlee and the rosario does not need the catlee then the rosario is not cosmogonic. If the rosario frap the stormie then the rosario does not need the stormie. If something frap the stormie then the stormie negate the somerset. If the rosario is sheeplike and the rosario does not chase the somerset then the somerset is not sheeplike. If the catlee does not need the somerset then the somerset sonnet the catlee. The stormie is surpliced.", "logic": "\nSonnet(stormie, rosario)\nFrap(stormie, rosario)\nCosmogonic(rosario)\nFrap(rosario, catlee)\nSonnet(catlee, stormie)\nSonnet(catlee, somerset)\nComplacent(catlee)\nCosmogonic(catlee)\nHidden(catlee)\nFrap(catlee, somerset)\nSonnet(somerset, stormie)\nSheeplike(somerset)\nFrap(somerset, stormie)\nnot Frap(somerset, catlee)\nnot Negate(somerset, catlee)\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Negate(x, somerset))\nforall x (Negate(x, somerset) -> Hidden(x))\nforall x (Hidden(x) -> Surpliced(x))\nnot Sonnet(rosario, catlee) and not Negate(rosario, catlee) -> not Cosmogonic(rosario)\nFrap(rosario, stormie) -> not Negate(rosario, stormie)\nforall x (Frap(x, stormie) -> Negate(stormie, somerset))\nSheeplike(rosario) and not Sonnet(rosario, somerset) -> not Sheeplike(somerset)\nnot Negate(catlee, somerset) -> Sonnet(somerset, catlee)\n\nSurpliced(stormie)\n\nFrap(somerset, stormie) and forall x (Frap(x, stormie) -> Negate(stormie, somerset)) -> therefore Negate(stormie, somerset) Negate(stormie, somerset) and forall x (Negate(x, somerset) -> Hidden(x)) -> therefore Hidden(stormie) Hidden(stormie) and forall x (Hidden(x) -> Surpliced(x)) -> therefore Surpliced(stormie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The kelvin ingraft the shaughn. The kelvin berate the shaughn. The shaughn is husbandly. The shaughn berate the garland. The garland ingraft the kelvin. The garland ingraft the garvy. The garland is hopeless. The garland is husbandly. The garland is flossy. The garland berate the garvy. The garvy ingraft the kelvin. The garvy is composite. The garvy berate the kelvin. The garvy does not like the garland. The garvy does not need the garland. If something is husbandly then it experience the garvy. If something experience the garvy then it is flossy. Round things are adducent. If the shaughn does not chase the garland and the shaughn does not need the garland then the shaughn is not husbandly. If the shaughn berate the kelvin then the shaughn does not need the kelvin. If something berate the kelvin then the kelvin experience the garvy. If the shaughn is composite and the shaughn does not chase the garvy then the garvy is not composite. If the garland does not need the garvy then the garvy ingraft the garland. The shaughn is not adducent.", "logic": "\nIngraft(kelvin, shaughn)\nBerate(kelvin, shaughn)\nHusbandly(shaughn)\nBerate(shaughn, garland)\nIngraft(garland, kelvin)\nIngraft(garland, garvy)\nHopeless(garland)\nHusbandly(garland)\nFlossy(garland)\nBerate(garland, garvy)\nIngraft(garvy, kelvin)\nComposite(garvy)\nBerate(garvy, kelvin)\nnot Berate(garvy, garland)\nnot Experience(garvy, garland)\nforall x (Husbandly(x) -> Experience(x, garvy))\nforall x (Experience(x, garvy) -> Flossy(x))\nforall x (Flossy(x) -> Adducent(x))\nnot Ingraft(shaughn, garland) and not Experience(shaughn, garland) -> not Husbandly(shaughn)\nBerate(shaughn, kelvin) -> not Experience(shaughn, kelvin)\nforall x (Berate(x, kelvin) -> Experience(kelvin, garvy))\nComposite(shaughn) and not Ingraft(shaughn, garvy) -> not Composite(garvy)\nnot Experience(garland, garvy) -> Ingraft(garvy, garland)\n\nnot Adducent(shaughn)\n\nHusbandly(shaughn) and forall x (Husbandly(x) -> Experience(x, garvy)) -> therefore Experience(shaughn, garvy) Experience(shaughn, garvy) and forall x (Experience(x, garvy) -> Flossy(x)) -> therefore Flossy(shaughn) Flossy(shaughn) and forall x (Flossy(x) -> Adducent(x)) -> therefore Adducent(shaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The maressa bastinado the jonis. The maressa confection the jonis. The jonis is piercing. The jonis confection the ahmet. The ahmet bastinado the maressa. The ahmet bastinado the poppy. The ahmet is motorless. The ahmet is piercing. The ahmet is homozygous. The ahmet confection the poppy. The poppy bastinado the maressa. The poppy is nether. The poppy confection the maressa. The poppy does not like the ahmet. The poppy does not need the ahmet. If something is piercing then it finger the poppy. If something finger the poppy then it is homozygous. Round things are unpictured. If the jonis does not chase the ahmet and the jonis does not need the ahmet then the jonis is not piercing. If the jonis confection the maressa then the jonis does not need the maressa. If something confection the maressa then the maressa finger the poppy. If the jonis is nether and the jonis does not chase the poppy then the poppy is not nether. If the ahmet does not need the poppy then the poppy bastinado the ahmet. The poppy does not chase the ahmet.", "logic": "\nBastinado(maressa, jonis)\nConfection(maressa, jonis)\nPiercing(jonis)\nConfection(jonis, ahmet)\nBastinado(ahmet, maressa)\nBastinado(ahmet, poppy)\nMotorless(ahmet)\nPiercing(ahmet)\nHomozygous(ahmet)\nConfection(ahmet, poppy)\nBastinado(poppy, maressa)\nNether(poppy)\nConfection(poppy, maressa)\nnot Confection(poppy, ahmet)\nnot Finger(poppy, ahmet)\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Finger(x, poppy))\nforall x (Finger(x, poppy) -> Homozygous(x))\nforall x (Homozygous(x) -> Unpictured(x))\nnot Bastinado(jonis, ahmet) and not Finger(jonis, ahmet) -> not Piercing(jonis)\nConfection(jonis, maressa) -> not Finger(jonis, maressa)\nforall x (Confection(x, maressa) -> Finger(maressa, poppy))\nNether(jonis) and not Bastinado(jonis, poppy) -> not Nether(poppy)\nnot Finger(ahmet, poppy) -> Bastinado(poppy, ahmet)\n\nnot Bastinado(poppy, ahmet)\n\nnot Finger(ahmet, poppy) -> Bastinado(poppy, ahmet) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The loretta trickle the amaleta. The loretta outvie the amaleta. The amaleta is repellant. The amaleta outvie the woochang. The woochang trickle the loretta. The woochang trickle the loise. The woochang is straggly. The woochang is repellant. The woochang is maggoty. The woochang outvie the loise. The loise trickle the loretta. The loise is donatist. The loise outvie the loretta. The loise does not like the woochang. The loise does not need the woochang. If something is repellant then it revive the loise. If something revive the loise then it is maggoty. Round things are unquiet. If the amaleta does not chase the woochang and the amaleta does not need the woochang then the amaleta is not repellant. If the amaleta outvie the loretta then the amaleta does not need the loretta. If something outvie the loretta then the loretta revive the loise. If the amaleta is donatist and the amaleta does not chase the loise then the loise is not donatist. If the woochang does not need the loise then the loise trickle the woochang. The loise revive the loise.", "logic": "\nTrickle(loretta, amaleta)\nOutvie(loretta, amaleta)\nRepellant(amaleta)\nOutvie(amaleta, woochang)\nTrickle(woochang, loretta)\nTrickle(woochang, loise)\nStraggly(woochang)\nRepellant(woochang)\nMaggoty(woochang)\nOutvie(woochang, loise)\nTrickle(loise, loretta)\nDonatist(loise)\nOutvie(loise, loretta)\nnot Outvie(loise, woochang)\nnot Revive(loise, woochang)\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Revive(x, loise))\nforall x (Revive(x, loise) -> Maggoty(x))\nforall x (Maggoty(x) -> Unquiet(x))\nnot Trickle(amaleta, woochang) and not Revive(amaleta, woochang) -> not Repellant(amaleta)\nOutvie(amaleta, loretta) -> not Revive(amaleta, loretta)\nforall x (Outvie(x, loretta) -> Revive(loretta, loise))\nDonatist(amaleta) and not Trickle(amaleta, loise) -> not Donatist(loise)\nnot Revive(woochang, loise) -> Trickle(loise, woochang)\n\nRevive(loise, loise)\n\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Revive(x, loise)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The olivier palpebrate the meara. The olivier bellyache the meara. The meara is atomistic. The meara bellyache the randee. The randee palpebrate the olivier. The randee palpebrate the camel. The randee is slubbed. The randee is atomistic. The randee is downbound. The randee bellyache the camel. The camel palpebrate the olivier. The camel is cotyloid. The camel bellyache the olivier. The camel does not like the randee. The camel does not need the randee. If something is atomistic then it parole the camel. If something parole the camel then it is downbound. Round things are arciform. If the meara does not chase the randee and the meara does not need the randee then the meara is not atomistic. If the meara bellyache the olivier then the meara does not need the olivier. If something bellyache the olivier then the olivier parole the camel. If the meara is cotyloid and the meara does not chase the camel then the camel is not cotyloid. If the randee does not need the camel then the camel palpebrate the randee. The camel is not downbound.", "logic": "\nPalpebrate(olivier, meara)\nBellyache(olivier, meara)\nAtomistic(meara)\nBellyache(meara, randee)\nPalpebrate(randee, olivier)\nPalpebrate(randee, camel)\nSlubbed(randee)\nAtomistic(randee)\nDownbound(randee)\nBellyache(randee, camel)\nPalpebrate(camel, olivier)\nCotyloid(camel)\nBellyache(camel, olivier)\nnot Bellyache(camel, randee)\nnot Parole(camel, randee)\nforall x (Atomistic(x) -> Parole(x, camel))\nforall x (Parole(x, camel) -> Downbound(x))\nforall x (Downbound(x) -> Arciform(x))\nnot Palpebrate(meara, randee) and not Parole(meara, randee) -> not Atomistic(meara)\nBellyache(meara, olivier) -> not Parole(meara, olivier)\nforall x (Bellyache(x, olivier) -> Parole(olivier, camel))\nCotyloid(meara) and not Palpebrate(meara, camel) -> not Cotyloid(camel)\nnot Parole(randee, camel) -> Palpebrate(camel, randee)\n\nnot Downbound(camel)\n\nforall x (Parole(x, camel) -> Downbound(x)) <- forall x (Atomistic(x) -> Parole(x, camel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The malcolm silhouette the tabbi. The malcolm subdue the tabbi. The tabbi is allegiant. The tabbi subdue the savina. The savina silhouette the malcolm. The savina silhouette the fianna. The savina is cephalopod. The savina is allegiant. The savina is foursquare. The savina subdue the fianna. The fianna silhouette the malcolm. The fianna is arboriform. The fianna subdue the malcolm. The fianna does not like the savina. The fianna does not need the savina. If something is allegiant then it suction the fianna. If something suction the fianna then it is foursquare. Round things are crenulated. If the tabbi does not chase the savina and the tabbi does not need the savina then the tabbi is not allegiant. If the tabbi subdue the malcolm then the tabbi does not need the malcolm. If something subdue the malcolm then the malcolm suction the fianna. If the tabbi is arboriform and the tabbi does not chase the fianna then the fianna is not arboriform. If the savina does not need the fianna then the fianna silhouette the savina. The fianna is crenulated.", "logic": "\nSilhouette(malcolm, tabbi)\nSubdue(malcolm, tabbi)\nAllegiant(tabbi)\nSubdue(tabbi, savina)\nSilhouette(savina, malcolm)\nSilhouette(savina, fianna)\nCephalopod(savina)\nAllegiant(savina)\nFoursquare(savina)\nSubdue(savina, fianna)\nSilhouette(fianna, malcolm)\nArboriform(fianna)\nSubdue(fianna, malcolm)\nnot Subdue(fianna, savina)\nnot Suction(fianna, savina)\nforall x (Allegiant(x) -> Suction(x, fianna))\nforall x (Suction(x, fianna) -> Foursquare(x))\nforall x (Foursquare(x) -> Crenulated(x))\nnot Silhouette(tabbi, savina) and not Suction(tabbi, savina) -> not Allegiant(tabbi)\nSubdue(tabbi, malcolm) -> not Suction(tabbi, malcolm)\nforall x (Subdue(x, malcolm) -> Suction(malcolm, fianna))\nArboriform(tabbi) and not Silhouette(tabbi, fianna) -> not Arboriform(fianna)\nnot Suction(savina, fianna) -> Silhouette(fianna, savina)\n\nCrenulated(fianna)\n\nforall x (Foursquare(x) -> Crenulated(x)) <- forall x (Suction(x, fianna) -> Foursquare(x)) <- forall x (Allegiant(x) -> Suction(x, fianna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The stephani respect the ilana. The stephani worst the ilana. The ilana is umpteen. The ilana worst the thekla. The thekla respect the stephani. The thekla respect the lynne. The thekla is incautious. The thekla is umpteen. The thekla is fathomable. The thekla worst the lynne. The lynne respect the stephani. The lynne is boggy. The lynne worst the stephani. The lynne does not like the thekla. The lynne does not need the thekla. If something is umpteen then it sick the lynne. If something sick the lynne then it is fathomable. Round things are skimpy. If the ilana does not chase the thekla and the ilana does not need the thekla then the ilana is not umpteen. If the ilana worst the stephani then the ilana does not need the stephani. If something worst the stephani then the stephani sick the lynne. If the ilana is boggy and the ilana does not chase the lynne then the lynne is not boggy. If the thekla does not need the lynne then the lynne respect the thekla. The lynne does not like the lynne.", "logic": "\nRespect(stephani, ilana)\nWorst(stephani, ilana)\nUmpteen(ilana)\nWorst(ilana, thekla)\nRespect(thekla, stephani)\nRespect(thekla, lynne)\nIncautious(thekla)\nUmpteen(thekla)\nFathomable(thekla)\nWorst(thekla, lynne)\nRespect(lynne, stephani)\nBoggy(lynne)\nWorst(lynne, stephani)\nnot Worst(lynne, thekla)\nnot Sick(lynne, thekla)\nforall x (Umpteen(x) -> Sick(x, lynne))\nforall x (Sick(x, lynne) -> Fathomable(x))\nforall x (Fathomable(x) -> Skimpy(x))\nnot Respect(ilana, thekla) and not Sick(ilana, thekla) -> not Umpteen(ilana)\nWorst(ilana, stephani) -> not Sick(ilana, stephani)\nforall x (Worst(x, stephani) -> Sick(stephani, lynne))\nBoggy(ilana) and not Respect(ilana, lynne) -> not Boggy(lynne)\nnot Sick(thekla, lynne) -> Respect(lynne, thekla)\n\nnot Worst(lynne, lynne)\n\nnot Worst(lynne, lynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The lauralee skyrocket the steve. The lauralee schlep the steve. The steve is subfusc. The steve schlep the susan. The susan skyrocket the lauralee. The susan skyrocket the janelle. The susan is derivative. The susan is subfusc. The susan is unbroken. The susan schlep the janelle. The janelle skyrocket the lauralee. The janelle is touching. The janelle schlep the lauralee. The janelle does not like the susan. The janelle does not need the susan. If something is subfusc then it sensualise the janelle. If something sensualise the janelle then it is unbroken. Round things are concave. If the steve does not chase the susan and the steve does not need the susan then the steve is not subfusc. If the steve schlep the lauralee then the steve does not need the lauralee. If something schlep the lauralee then the lauralee sensualise the janelle. If the steve is touching and the steve does not chase the janelle then the janelle is not touching. If the susan does not need the janelle then the janelle skyrocket the susan. The lauralee is derivative.", "logic": "\nSkyrocket(lauralee, steve)\nSchlep(lauralee, steve)\nSubfusc(steve)\nSchlep(steve, susan)\nSkyrocket(susan, lauralee)\nSkyrocket(susan, janelle)\nDerivative(susan)\nSubfusc(susan)\nUnbroken(susan)\nSchlep(susan, janelle)\nSkyrocket(janelle, lauralee)\nTouching(janelle)\nSchlep(janelle, lauralee)\nnot Schlep(janelle, susan)\nnot Sensualise(janelle, susan)\nforall x (Subfusc(x) -> Sensualise(x, janelle))\nforall x (Sensualise(x, janelle) -> Unbroken(x))\nforall x (Unbroken(x) -> Concave(x))\nnot Skyrocket(steve, susan) and not Sensualise(steve, susan) -> not Subfusc(steve)\nSchlep(steve, lauralee) -> not Sensualise(steve, lauralee)\nforall x (Schlep(x, lauralee) -> Sensualise(lauralee, janelle))\nTouching(steve) and not Skyrocket(steve, janelle) -> not Touching(janelle)\nnot Sensualise(susan, janelle) -> Skyrocket(janelle, susan)\n\nDerivative(lauralee)\n\nDerivative(lauralee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The uriah humour the joe. The uriah apportion the joe. The joe is dummy. The joe apportion the xena. The xena humour the uriah. The xena humour the helga. The xena is wide. The xena is dummy. The xena is morose. The xena apportion the helga. The helga humour the uriah. The helga is unswept. The helga apportion the uriah. The helga does not like the xena. The helga does not need the xena. If something is dummy then it conk the helga. If something conk the helga then it is morose. Round things are dated. If the joe does not chase the xena and the joe does not need the xena then the joe is not dummy. If the joe apportion the uriah then the joe does not need the uriah. If something apportion the uriah then the uriah conk the helga. If the joe is unswept and the joe does not chase the helga then the helga is not unswept. If the xena does not need the helga then the helga humour the xena. The xena does not need the joe.", "logic": "\nHumour(uriah, joe)\nApportion(uriah, joe)\nDummy(joe)\nApportion(joe, xena)\nHumour(xena, uriah)\nHumour(xena, helga)\nWide(xena)\nDummy(xena)\nMorose(xena)\nApportion(xena, helga)\nHumour(helga, uriah)\nUnswept(helga)\nApportion(helga, uriah)\nnot Apportion(helga, xena)\nnot Conk(helga, xena)\nforall x (Dummy(x) -> Conk(x, helga))\nforall x (Conk(x, helga) -> Morose(x))\nforall x (Morose(x) -> Dated(x))\nnot Humour(joe, xena) and not Conk(joe, xena) -> not Dummy(joe)\nApportion(joe, uriah) -> not Conk(joe, uriah)\nforall x (Apportion(x, uriah) -> Conk(uriah, helga))\nUnswept(joe) and not Humour(joe, helga) -> not Unswept(helga)\nnot Conk(xena, helga) -> Humour(helga, xena)\n\nnot Conk(xena, joe)\n\nnot Conk(xena, joe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The townsend minify the jillene. The townsend stymy the jillene. The jillene is feudatory. The jillene stymy the darla. The darla minify the townsend. The darla minify the amanda. The darla is cautious. The darla is feudatory. The darla is permanent. The darla stymy the amanda. The amanda minify the townsend. The amanda is archetypal. The amanda stymy the townsend. The amanda does not like the darla. The amanda does not need the darla. If something is feudatory then it dally the amanda. If something dally the amanda then it is permanent. Round things are infertile. If the jillene does not chase the darla and the jillene does not need the darla then the jillene is not feudatory. If the jillene stymy the townsend then the jillene does not need the townsend. If something stymy the townsend then the townsend dally the amanda. If the jillene is archetypal and the jillene does not chase the amanda then the amanda is not archetypal. If the darla does not need the amanda then the amanda minify the darla. The townsend is feudatory.", "logic": "\nMinify(townsend, jillene)\nStymy(townsend, jillene)\nFeudatory(jillene)\nStymy(jillene, darla)\nMinify(darla, townsend)\nMinify(darla, amanda)\nCautious(darla)\nFeudatory(darla)\nPermanent(darla)\nStymy(darla, amanda)\nMinify(amanda, townsend)\nArchetypal(amanda)\nStymy(amanda, townsend)\nnot Stymy(amanda, darla)\nnot Dally(amanda, darla)\nforall x (Feudatory(x) -> Dally(x, amanda))\nforall x (Dally(x, amanda) -> Permanent(x))\nforall x (Permanent(x) -> Infertile(x))\nnot Minify(jillene, darla) and not Dally(jillene, darla) -> not Feudatory(jillene)\nStymy(jillene, townsend) -> not Dally(jillene, townsend)\nforall x (Stymy(x, townsend) -> Dally(townsend, amanda))\nArchetypal(jillene) and not Minify(jillene, amanda) -> not Archetypal(amanda)\nnot Dally(darla, amanda) -> Minify(amanda, darla)\n\nFeudatory(townsend)\n\nFeudatory(townsend) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1300"} {"premises": "The rainer is equable. The rainer is anosmic. The rainer is univalve. The rainer is startled. The rainer is agamous. If the rainer is equable and the rainer is agamous then the rainer is univalve. If something is agamous then it is anosmic. All equable, anosmic things are agamous. If the rainer is startled and the rainer is anosmic then the rainer is equable. If something is agamous and anosmic then it is univalve. Red things are anosmic. The rainer is anosmic.", "logic": "\nEquable(rainer)\nAnosmic(rainer)\nUnivalve(rainer)\nStartled(rainer)\nAgamous(rainer)\nEquable(rainer) and Agamous(rainer) -> Univalve(rainer)\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Anosmic(x))\nforall x (Equable(x) and Anosmic(x) -> Agamous(x))\nStartled(rainer) and Anosmic(rainer) -> Equable(rainer)\nforall x (Agamous(x) and Anosmic(x) -> Univalve(x))\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Anosmic(x))\n\nAnosmic(rainer)\n\ntherefore Anosmic(rainer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1704"} {"premises": "The ruthy is dizygous. The ruthy is chapfallen. The ruthy is lxxvii. The ruthy is circular. The ruthy is leal. If the ruthy is dizygous and the ruthy is leal then the ruthy is lxxvii. If something is leal then it is chapfallen. All dizygous, chapfallen things are leal. If the ruthy is circular and the ruthy is chapfallen then the ruthy is dizygous. If something is leal and chapfallen then it is lxxvii. Red things are chapfallen. The ruthy is not lxxvii.", "logic": "\nDizygous(ruthy)\nChapfallen(ruthy)\nLxxvii(ruthy)\nCircular(ruthy)\nLeal(ruthy)\nDizygous(ruthy) and Leal(ruthy) -> Lxxvii(ruthy)\nforall x (Leal(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) and Chapfallen(x) -> Leal(x))\nCircular(ruthy) and Chapfallen(ruthy) -> Dizygous(ruthy)\nforall x (Leal(x) and Chapfallen(x) -> Lxxvii(x))\nforall x (Leal(x) -> Chapfallen(x))\n\nnot Lxxvii(ruthy)\n\ntherefore Lxxvii(ruthy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1704"} {"premises": "The gavra is uncurled. The gavra is gelid. The gavra is nontoxic. The gavra is fivefold. The gavra is salient. If the gavra is uncurled and the gavra is salient then the gavra is nontoxic. If something is salient then it is gelid. All uncurled, gelid things are salient. If the gavra is fivefold and the gavra is gelid then the gavra is uncurled. If something is salient and gelid then it is nontoxic. Red things are gelid. The gavra does not visit the gavra.", "logic": "\nUncurled(gavra)\nGelid(gavra)\nNontoxic(gavra)\nFivefold(gavra)\nSalient(gavra)\nUncurled(gavra) and Salient(gavra) -> Nontoxic(gavra)\nforall x (Salient(x) -> Gelid(x))\nforall x (Uncurled(x) and Gelid(x) -> Salient(x))\nFivefold(gavra) and Gelid(gavra) -> Uncurled(gavra)\nforall x (Salient(x) and Gelid(x) -> Nontoxic(x))\nforall x (Salient(x) -> Gelid(x))\n\nnot Visits(gavra, gavra)\n\nnot Visits(gavra, gavra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1704"} {"premises": "The maria is serrate. The maria is nosey. The maria is unfailing. The maria is afrikaner. The maria is squeaking. If the maria is serrate and the maria is squeaking then the maria is unfailing. If something is squeaking then it is nosey. All serrate, nosey things are squeaking. If the maria is afrikaner and the maria is nosey then the maria is serrate. If something is squeaking and nosey then it is unfailing. Red things are nosey. The maria likes the maria.", "logic": "\nSerrate(maria)\nNosey(maria)\nUnfailing(maria)\nAfrikaner(maria)\nSqueaking(maria)\nSerrate(maria) and Squeaking(maria) -> Unfailing(maria)\nforall x (Squeaking(x) -> Nosey(x))\nforall x (Serrate(x) and Nosey(x) -> Squeaking(x))\nAfrikaner(maria) and Nosey(maria) -> Serrate(maria)\nforall x (Squeaking(x) and Nosey(x) -> Unfailing(x))\nforall x (Squeaking(x) -> Nosey(x))\n\nLikes(maria, maria)\n\nLikes(maria, maria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1704"} {"premises": "The coretta is circadian. The coretta is benighted. The coretta caper the tally. The tally claxon the coretta. The tally is balky. The tally is steely. The wait is steely. If something claxon the wait and the wait claxon the tally then the tally canonise the wait. If something is steely then it claxon the tally. If something canonise the coretta and the coretta is circadian then it canonise the wait. If something claxon the coretta then it claxon the wait. If something caper the coretta then it canonise the tally. If something canonise the wait then it is circadian. The coretta caper the tally.", "logic": "\nCircadian(coretta)\nBenighted(coretta)\nCaper(coretta, tally)\nClaxon(tally, coretta)\nBalky(tally)\nSteely(tally)\nSteely(wait)\nforall x (Claxon(x, wait) and Claxon(wait, tally) -> Canonise(tally, wait))\nforall x (Steely(x) -> Claxon(x, tally))\nforall x (Canonise(x, coretta) and Circadian(coretta) -> Canonise(x, wait))\nforall x (Claxon(x, coretta) -> Claxon(x, wait))\nforall x (Caper(x, coretta) -> Canonise(x, tally))\nforall x (Canonise(x, wait) -> Circadian(x))\n\nCaper(coretta, tally)\n\ntherefore Caper(coretta, tally)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The case is remediable. The case is seedless. The case wound the zerk. The zerk apprize the case. The zerk is jointed. The zerk is singular. The mariana is singular. If something apprize the mariana and the mariana apprize the zerk then the zerk disquiet the mariana. If something is singular then it apprize the zerk. If something disquiet the case and the case is remediable then it disquiet the mariana. If something apprize the case then it apprize the mariana. If something wound the case then it disquiet the zerk. If something disquiet the mariana then it is remediable. The case is not remediable.", "logic": "\nRemediable(case)\nSeedless(case)\nWound(case, zerk)\nApprize(zerk, case)\nJointed(zerk)\nSingular(zerk)\nSingular(mariana)\nforall x (Apprize(x, mariana) and Apprize(mariana, zerk) -> Disquiet(zerk, mariana))\nforall x (Singular(x) -> Apprize(x, zerk))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, case) and Remediable(case) -> Disquiet(x, mariana))\nforall x (Apprize(x, case) -> Apprize(x, mariana))\nforall x (Wound(x, case) -> Disquiet(x, zerk))\nforall x (Disquiet(x, mariana) -> Remediable(x))\n\nnot Remediable(case)\n\ntherefore Remediable(case)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The obadiah is mechanized. The obadiah is proximo. The obadiah mail the calley. The calley void the obadiah. The calley is curvaceous. The calley is catchy. The dougie is catchy. If something void the dougie and the dougie void the calley then the calley underplay the dougie. If something is catchy then it void the calley. If something underplay the obadiah and the obadiah is mechanized then it underplay the dougie. If something void the obadiah then it void the dougie. If something mail the obadiah then it underplay the calley. If something underplay the dougie then it is mechanized. The calley void the calley.", "logic": "\nMechanized(obadiah)\nProximo(obadiah)\nMail(obadiah, calley)\nVoid(calley, obadiah)\nCurvaceous(calley)\nCatchy(calley)\nCatchy(dougie)\nforall x (Void(x, dougie) and Void(dougie, calley) -> Underplay(calley, dougie))\nforall x (Catchy(x) -> Void(x, calley))\nforall x (Underplay(x, obadiah) and Mechanized(obadiah) -> Underplay(x, dougie))\nforall x (Void(x, obadiah) -> Void(x, dougie))\nforall x (Mail(x, obadiah) -> Underplay(x, calley))\nforall x (Underplay(x, dougie) -> Mechanized(x))\n\nVoid(calley, calley)\n\nCatchy(calley) and forall x (Catchy(x) -> Void(x, calley)) -> therefore Void(calley, calley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The mignonne is burrlike. The mignonne is reformist. The mignonne prickle the teddy. The teddy geyser the mignonne. The teddy is sinewy. The teddy is interlaced. The valentin is interlaced. If something geyser the valentin and the valentin geyser the teddy then the teddy silver the valentin. If something is interlaced then it geyser the teddy. If something silver the mignonne and the mignonne is burrlike then it silver the valentin. If something geyser the mignonne then it geyser the valentin. If something prickle the mignonne then it silver the teddy. If something silver the valentin then it is burrlike. The teddy does not eat the teddy.", "logic": "\nBurrlike(mignonne)\nReformist(mignonne)\nPrickle(mignonne, teddy)\nGeyser(teddy, mignonne)\nSinewy(teddy)\nInterlaced(teddy)\nInterlaced(valentin)\nforall x (Geyser(x, valentin) and Geyser(valentin, teddy) -> Silver(teddy, valentin))\nforall x (Interlaced(x) -> Geyser(x, teddy))\nforall x (Silver(x, mignonne) and Burrlike(mignonne) -> Silver(x, valentin))\nforall x (Geyser(x, mignonne) -> Geyser(x, valentin))\nforall x (Prickle(x, mignonne) -> Silver(x, teddy))\nforall x (Silver(x, valentin) -> Burrlike(x))\n\nnot Geyser(teddy, teddy)\n\nInterlaced(teddy) and forall x (Interlaced(x) -> Geyser(x, teddy)) -> therefore Geyser(teddy, teddy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The debera is sacculated. The debera is cushioned. The debera gain the rea. The rea conflict the debera. The rea is assamese. The rea is venturous. The florrie is venturous. If something conflict the florrie and the florrie conflict the rea then the rea scarper the florrie. If something is venturous then it conflict the rea. If something scarper the debera and the debera is sacculated then it scarper the florrie. If something conflict the debera then it conflict the florrie. If something gain the debera then it scarper the rea. If something scarper the florrie then it is sacculated. The rea scarper the florrie.", "logic": "\nSacculated(debera)\nCushioned(debera)\nGain(debera, rea)\nConflict(rea, debera)\nAssamese(rea)\nVenturous(rea)\nVenturous(florrie)\nforall x (Conflict(x, florrie) and Conflict(florrie, rea) -> Scarper(rea, florrie))\nforall x (Venturous(x) -> Conflict(x, rea))\nforall x (Scarper(x, debera) and Sacculated(debera) -> Scarper(x, florrie))\nforall x (Conflict(x, debera) -> Conflict(x, florrie))\nforall x (Gain(x, debera) -> Scarper(x, rea))\nforall x (Scarper(x, florrie) -> Sacculated(x))\n\nScarper(rea, florrie)\n\nConflict(rea, debera) and forall x (Conflict(x, debera) -> Conflict(x, florrie)) -> therefore Conflict(rea, florrie) Venturous(florrie) and forall x (Venturous(x) -> Conflict(x, rea)) -> therefore Conflict(florrie, rea) Conflict(rea, florrie) and Conflict(florrie, rea) and forall x (Conflict(x, florrie) and Conflict(florrie, rea) -> Scarper(rea, florrie)) -> therefore Scarper(rea, florrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The mateo is bismuthic. The mateo is partitive. The mateo snort the belicia. The belicia childproof the mateo. The belicia is ladened. The belicia is fictive. The chaim is fictive. If something childproof the chaim and the chaim childproof the belicia then the belicia heave the chaim. If something is fictive then it childproof the belicia. If something heave the mateo and the mateo is bismuthic then it heave the chaim. If something childproof the mateo then it childproof the chaim. If something snort the mateo then it heave the belicia. If something heave the chaim then it is bismuthic. The belicia does not need the chaim.", "logic": "\nBismuthic(mateo)\nPartitive(mateo)\nSnort(mateo, belicia)\nChildproof(belicia, mateo)\nLadened(belicia)\nFictive(belicia)\nFictive(chaim)\nforall x (Childproof(x, chaim) and Childproof(chaim, belicia) -> Heave(belicia, chaim))\nforall x (Fictive(x) -> Childproof(x, belicia))\nforall x (Heave(x, mateo) and Bismuthic(mateo) -> Heave(x, chaim))\nforall x (Childproof(x, mateo) -> Childproof(x, chaim))\nforall x (Snort(x, mateo) -> Heave(x, belicia))\nforall x (Heave(x, chaim) -> Bismuthic(x))\n\nnot Heave(belicia, chaim)\n\nChildproof(belicia, mateo) and forall x (Childproof(x, mateo) -> Childproof(x, chaim)) -> therefore Childproof(belicia, chaim) Fictive(chaim) and forall x (Fictive(x) -> Childproof(x, belicia)) -> therefore Childproof(chaim, belicia) Childproof(belicia, chaim) and Childproof(chaim, belicia) and forall x (Childproof(x, chaim) and Childproof(chaim, belicia) -> Heave(belicia, chaim)) -> therefore Heave(belicia, chaim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The kenton is melancholy. The kenton is lepidote. The kenton tithe the judd. The judd banish the kenton. The judd is unverified. The judd is baltic. The trace is baltic. If something banish the trace and the trace banish the judd then the judd batik the trace. If something is baltic then it banish the judd. If something batik the kenton and the kenton is melancholy then it batik the trace. If something banish the kenton then it banish the trace. If something tithe the kenton then it batik the judd. If something batik the trace then it is melancholy. The judd is melancholy.", "logic": "\nMelancholy(kenton)\nLepidote(kenton)\nTithe(kenton, judd)\nBanish(judd, kenton)\nUnverified(judd)\nBaltic(judd)\nBaltic(trace)\nforall x (Banish(x, trace) and Banish(trace, judd) -> Batik(judd, trace))\nforall x (Baltic(x) -> Banish(x, judd))\nforall x (Batik(x, kenton) and Melancholy(kenton) -> Batik(x, trace))\nforall x (Banish(x, kenton) -> Banish(x, trace))\nforall x (Tithe(x, kenton) -> Batik(x, judd))\nforall x (Batik(x, trace) -> Melancholy(x))\n\nMelancholy(judd)\n\nBanish(judd, kenton) and forall x (Banish(x, kenton) -> Banish(x, trace)) -> therefore Banish(judd, trace) Baltic(trace) and forall x (Baltic(x) -> Banish(x, judd)) -> therefore Banish(trace, judd) Banish(judd, trace) and Banish(trace, judd) and forall x (Banish(x, trace) and Banish(trace, judd) -> Batik(judd, trace)) -> therefore Batik(judd, trace) Batik(judd, trace) and forall x (Batik(x, trace) -> Melancholy(x)) -> therefore Melancholy(judd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The pavla is beady. The pavla is repentant. The pavla aviate the leroy. The leroy situate the pavla. The leroy is frore. The leroy is positivist. The darrick is positivist. If something situate the darrick and the darrick situate the leroy then the leroy assault the darrick. If something is positivist then it situate the leroy. If something assault the pavla and the pavla is beady then it assault the darrick. If something situate the pavla then it situate the darrick. If something aviate the pavla then it assault the leroy. If something assault the darrick then it is beady. The leroy is not beady.", "logic": "\nBeady(pavla)\nRepentant(pavla)\nAviate(pavla, leroy)\nSituate(leroy, pavla)\nFrore(leroy)\nPositivist(leroy)\nPositivist(darrick)\nforall x (Situate(x, darrick) and Situate(darrick, leroy) -> Assault(leroy, darrick))\nforall x (Positivist(x) -> Situate(x, leroy))\nforall x (Assault(x, pavla) and Beady(pavla) -> Assault(x, darrick))\nforall x (Situate(x, pavla) -> Situate(x, darrick))\nforall x (Aviate(x, pavla) -> Assault(x, leroy))\nforall x (Assault(x, darrick) -> Beady(x))\n\nnot Beady(leroy)\n\nSituate(leroy, pavla) and forall x (Situate(x, pavla) -> Situate(x, darrick)) -> therefore Situate(leroy, darrick) Positivist(darrick) and forall x (Positivist(x) -> Situate(x, leroy)) -> therefore Situate(darrick, leroy) Situate(leroy, darrick) and Situate(darrick, leroy) and forall x (Situate(x, darrick) and Situate(darrick, leroy) -> Assault(leroy, darrick)) -> therefore Assault(leroy, darrick) Assault(leroy, darrick) and forall x (Assault(x, darrick) -> Beady(x)) -> therefore Beady(leroy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The quintina is baseborn. The quintina is warped. The quintina unyoke the garnette. The garnette dishonor the quintina. The garnette is earthy. The garnette is copesettic. The pablo is copesettic. If something dishonor the pablo and the pablo dishonor the garnette then the garnette snooze the pablo. If something is copesettic then it dishonor the garnette. If something snooze the quintina and the quintina is baseborn then it snooze the pablo. If something dishonor the quintina then it dishonor the pablo. If something unyoke the quintina then it snooze the garnette. If something snooze the pablo then it is baseborn. The quintina does not eat the pablo.", "logic": "\nBaseborn(quintina)\nWarped(quintina)\nUnyoke(quintina, garnette)\nDishonor(garnette, quintina)\nEarthy(garnette)\nCopesettic(garnette)\nCopesettic(pablo)\nforall x (Dishonor(x, pablo) and Dishonor(pablo, garnette) -> Snooze(garnette, pablo))\nforall x (Copesettic(x) -> Dishonor(x, garnette))\nforall x (Snooze(x, quintina) and Baseborn(quintina) -> Snooze(x, pablo))\nforall x (Dishonor(x, quintina) -> Dishonor(x, pablo))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, quintina) -> Snooze(x, garnette))\nforall x (Snooze(x, pablo) -> Baseborn(x))\n\nnot Dishonor(quintina, pablo)\n\nforall x (Dishonor(x, quintina) -> Dishonor(x, pablo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The charissa is monotypic. The charissa is testate. The charissa symmetrize the flinn. The flinn walk the charissa. The flinn is illusory. The flinn is mean. The lorianna is mean. If something walk the lorianna and the lorianna walk the flinn then the flinn intimate the lorianna. If something is mean then it walk the flinn. If something intimate the charissa and the charissa is monotypic then it intimate the lorianna. If something walk the charissa then it walk the lorianna. If something symmetrize the charissa then it intimate the flinn. If something intimate the lorianna then it is monotypic. The charissa intimate the flinn.", "logic": "\nMonotypic(charissa)\nTestate(charissa)\nSymmetrize(charissa, flinn)\nWalk(flinn, charissa)\nIllusory(flinn)\nMean(flinn)\nMean(lorianna)\nforall x (Walk(x, lorianna) and Walk(lorianna, flinn) -> Intimate(flinn, lorianna))\nforall x (Mean(x) -> Walk(x, flinn))\nforall x (Intimate(x, charissa) and Monotypic(charissa) -> Intimate(x, lorianna))\nforall x (Walk(x, charissa) -> Walk(x, lorianna))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, charissa) -> Intimate(x, flinn))\nforall x (Intimate(x, lorianna) -> Monotypic(x))\n\nIntimate(charissa, flinn)\n\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, charissa) -> Intimate(x, flinn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The inglebert is vacillant. The inglebert is nourished. The inglebert replenish the evie. The evie dedicate the inglebert. The evie is serflike. The evie is ranging. The merrielle is ranging. If something dedicate the merrielle and the merrielle dedicate the evie then the evie dangle the merrielle. If something is ranging then it dedicate the evie. If something dangle the inglebert and the inglebert is vacillant then it dangle the merrielle. If something dedicate the inglebert then it dedicate the merrielle. If something replenish the inglebert then it dangle the evie. If something dangle the merrielle then it is vacillant. The evie does not need the evie.", "logic": "\nVacillant(inglebert)\nNourished(inglebert)\nReplenish(inglebert, evie)\nDedicate(evie, inglebert)\nSerflike(evie)\nRanging(evie)\nRanging(merrielle)\nforall x (Dedicate(x, merrielle) and Dedicate(merrielle, evie) -> Dangle(evie, merrielle))\nforall x (Ranging(x) -> Dedicate(x, evie))\nforall x (Dangle(x, inglebert) and Vacillant(inglebert) -> Dangle(x, merrielle))\nforall x (Dedicate(x, inglebert) -> Dedicate(x, merrielle))\nforall x (Replenish(x, inglebert) -> Dangle(x, evie))\nforall x (Dangle(x, merrielle) -> Vacillant(x))\n\nnot Dangle(evie, evie)\n\nforall x (Replenish(x, inglebert) -> Dangle(x, evie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The carolee is firsthand. The carolee is gracious. The carolee conjugate the deva. The deva unyoke the carolee. The deva is arachnoid. The deva is posed. The chandler is posed. If something unyoke the chandler and the chandler unyoke the deva then the deva redline the chandler. If something is posed then it unyoke the deva. If something redline the carolee and the carolee is firsthand then it redline the chandler. If something unyoke the carolee then it unyoke the chandler. If something conjugate the carolee then it redline the deva. If something redline the chandler then it is firsthand. The chandler is firsthand.", "logic": "\nFirsthand(carolee)\nGracious(carolee)\nConjugate(carolee, deva)\nUnyoke(deva, carolee)\nArachnoid(deva)\nPosed(deva)\nPosed(chandler)\nforall x (Unyoke(x, chandler) and Unyoke(chandler, deva) -> Redline(deva, chandler))\nforall x (Posed(x) -> Unyoke(x, deva))\nforall x (Redline(x, carolee) and Firsthand(carolee) -> Redline(x, chandler))\nforall x (Unyoke(x, carolee) -> Unyoke(x, chandler))\nforall x (Conjugate(x, carolee) -> Redline(x, deva))\nforall x (Redline(x, chandler) -> Firsthand(x))\n\nFirsthand(chandler)\n\nforall x (Redline(x, chandler) -> Firsthand(x)) <- forall x (Redline(x, carolee) and Firsthand(carolee) -> Redline(x, chandler)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The lukas is penile. The lukas is seaworthy. The lukas angulate the charlena. The charlena roost the lukas. The charlena is auxetic. The charlena is mongolian. The magna is mongolian. If something roost the magna and the magna roost the charlena then the charlena chew the magna. If something is mongolian then it roost the charlena. If something chew the lukas and the lukas is penile then it chew the magna. If something roost the lukas then it roost the magna. If something angulate the lukas then it chew the charlena. If something chew the magna then it is penile. The magna does not see the lukas.", "logic": "\nPenile(lukas)\nSeaworthy(lukas)\nAngulate(lukas, charlena)\nRoost(charlena, lukas)\nAuxetic(charlena)\nMongolian(charlena)\nMongolian(magna)\nforall x (Roost(x, magna) and Roost(magna, charlena) -> Chew(charlena, magna))\nforall x (Mongolian(x) -> Roost(x, charlena))\nforall x (Chew(x, lukas) and Penile(lukas) -> Chew(x, magna))\nforall x (Roost(x, lukas) -> Roost(x, magna))\nforall x (Angulate(x, lukas) -> Chew(x, charlena))\nforall x (Chew(x, magna) -> Penile(x))\n\nnot Angulate(magna, lukas)\n\nnot Angulate(magna, lukas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The nil is ageless. The nil is roadless. The nil coke the arvy. The arvy scourge the nil. The arvy is chaldean. The arvy is sedentary. The gerrard is sedentary. If something scourge the gerrard and the gerrard scourge the arvy then the arvy goad the gerrard. If something is sedentary then it scourge the arvy. If something goad the nil and the nil is ageless then it goad the gerrard. If something scourge the nil then it scourge the gerrard. If something coke the nil then it goad the arvy. If something goad the gerrard then it is ageless. The nil is chaldean.", "logic": "\nAgeless(nil)\nRoadless(nil)\nCoke(nil, arvy)\nScourge(arvy, nil)\nChaldean(arvy)\nSedentary(arvy)\nSedentary(gerrard)\nforall x (Scourge(x, gerrard) and Scourge(gerrard, arvy) -> Goad(arvy, gerrard))\nforall x (Sedentary(x) -> Scourge(x, arvy))\nforall x (Goad(x, nil) and Ageless(nil) -> Goad(x, gerrard))\nforall x (Scourge(x, nil) -> Scourge(x, gerrard))\nforall x (Coke(x, nil) -> Goad(x, arvy))\nforall x (Goad(x, gerrard) -> Ageless(x))\n\nChaldean(nil)\n\nChaldean(nil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The barnaby is multicolor. The barnaby is defiled. The barnaby coact the walden. The walden martyrize the barnaby. The walden is fusiform. The walden is aboulic. The darci is aboulic. If something martyrize the darci and the darci martyrize the walden then the walden ablate the darci. If something is aboulic then it martyrize the walden. If something ablate the barnaby and the barnaby is multicolor then it ablate the darci. If something martyrize the barnaby then it martyrize the darci. If something coact the barnaby then it ablate the walden. If something ablate the darci then it is multicolor. The barnaby is not cold.", "logic": "\nMulticolor(barnaby)\nDefiled(barnaby)\nCoact(barnaby, walden)\nMartyrize(walden, barnaby)\nFusiform(walden)\nAboulic(walden)\nAboulic(darci)\nforall x (Martyrize(x, darci) and Martyrize(darci, walden) -> Ablate(walden, darci))\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Martyrize(x, walden))\nforall x (Ablate(x, barnaby) and Multicolor(barnaby) -> Ablate(x, darci))\nforall x (Martyrize(x, barnaby) -> Martyrize(x, darci))\nforall x (Coact(x, barnaby) -> Ablate(x, walden))\nforall x (Ablate(x, darci) -> Multicolor(x))\n\nnot Cold(barnaby)\n\nnot Cold(barnaby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The barris is veiled. The barris is ventral. The barris initial the darcey. The darcey unfurl the barris. The darcey is diametral. The darcey is aecial. The vanny is aecial. If something unfurl the vanny and the vanny unfurl the darcey then the darcey holler the vanny. If something is aecial then it unfurl the darcey. If something holler the barris and the barris is veiled then it holler the vanny. If something unfurl the barris then it unfurl the vanny. If something initial the barris then it holler the darcey. If something holler the vanny then it is veiled. The darcey initial the darcey.", "logic": "\nVeiled(barris)\nVentral(barris)\nInitial(barris, darcey)\nUnfurl(darcey, barris)\nDiametral(darcey)\nAecial(darcey)\nAecial(vanny)\nforall x (Unfurl(x, vanny) and Unfurl(vanny, darcey) -> Holler(darcey, vanny))\nforall x (Aecial(x) -> Unfurl(x, darcey))\nforall x (Holler(x, barris) and Veiled(barris) -> Holler(x, vanny))\nforall x (Unfurl(x, barris) -> Unfurl(x, vanny))\nforall x (Initial(x, barris) -> Holler(x, darcey))\nforall x (Holler(x, vanny) -> Veiled(x))\n\nInitial(darcey, darcey)\n\nInitial(darcey, darcey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1009"} {"premises": "The chloette trowel the ofelia. The chloette discard the tilda. The ofelia is resupine. The ofelia discard the deb. The tilda is casuistic. The tilda trowel the ofelia. The deb is seafaring. If someone void the tilda then they see the chloette. If someone is seafaring and they like the deb then the deb void the chloette. If someone discard the tilda and they need the ofelia then the ofelia void the chloette. All casuistic people are helpless. If someone is helpless then they are resupine. If someone is resupine and casuistic then they like the deb. The chloette discard the tilda.", "logic": "\nTrowel(chloette, ofelia)\nDiscard(chloette, tilda)\nResupine(ofelia)\nDiscard(ofelia, deb)\nCasuistic(tilda)\nTrowel(tilda, ofelia)\nSeafaring(deb)\nforall x (Void(x, tilda) -> Discard(x, chloette))\nforall x (Seafaring(x) and Void(x, deb) -> Void(deb, chloette))\nforall x (Discard(x, tilda) and Trowel(x, ofelia) -> Void(ofelia, chloette))\nforall x (Casuistic(x) -> Helpless(x))\nforall x (Helpless(x) -> Resupine(x))\nforall x (Resupine(x) and Casuistic(x) -> Void(x, deb))\n\nDiscard(chloette, tilda)\n\ntherefore Discard(chloette, tilda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The gerti vote the gusella. The gerti backspace the dieter. The gusella is tibetan. The gusella backspace the ward. The dieter is bedridden. The dieter vote the gusella. The ward is unseeded. If someone bilk the dieter then they see the gerti. If someone is unseeded and they like the ward then the ward bilk the gerti. If someone backspace the dieter and they need the gusella then the gusella bilk the gerti. All bedridden people are shocking. If someone is shocking then they are tibetan. If someone is tibetan and bedridden then they like the ward. The ward is not unseeded.", "logic": "\nVote(gerti, gusella)\nBackspace(gerti, dieter)\nTibetan(gusella)\nBackspace(gusella, ward)\nBedridden(dieter)\nVote(dieter, gusella)\nUnseeded(ward)\nforall x (Bilk(x, dieter) -> Backspace(x, gerti))\nforall x (Unseeded(x) and Bilk(x, ward) -> Bilk(ward, gerti))\nforall x (Backspace(x, dieter) and Vote(x, gusella) -> Bilk(gusella, gerti))\nforall x (Bedridden(x) -> Shocking(x))\nforall x (Shocking(x) -> Tibetan(x))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) and Bedridden(x) -> Bilk(x, ward))\n\nnot Unseeded(ward)\n\ntherefore Unseeded(ward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The pepito anastomose the ninetta. The pepito audition the shepperd. The ninetta is bacterial. The ninetta audition the celinka. The shepperd is worst. The shepperd anastomose the ninetta. The celinka is rearing. If someone tomahawk the shepperd then they see the pepito. If someone is rearing and they like the celinka then the celinka tomahawk the pepito. If someone audition the shepperd and they need the ninetta then the ninetta tomahawk the pepito. All worst people are nonbearing. If someone is nonbearing then they are bacterial. If someone is bacterial and worst then they like the celinka. The shepperd is nonbearing.", "logic": "\nAnastomose(pepito, ninetta)\nAudition(pepito, shepperd)\nBacterial(ninetta)\nAudition(ninetta, celinka)\nWorst(shepperd)\nAnastomose(shepperd, ninetta)\nRearing(celinka)\nforall x (Tomahawk(x, shepperd) -> Audition(x, pepito))\nforall x (Rearing(x) and Tomahawk(x, celinka) -> Tomahawk(celinka, pepito))\nforall x (Audition(x, shepperd) and Anastomose(x, ninetta) -> Tomahawk(ninetta, pepito))\nforall x (Worst(x) -> Nonbearing(x))\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) -> Bacterial(x))\nforall x (Bacterial(x) and Worst(x) -> Tomahawk(x, celinka))\n\nNonbearing(shepperd)\n\nWorst(shepperd) and forall x (Worst(x) -> Nonbearing(x)) -> therefore Nonbearing(shepperd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The laraine drivel the guillema. The laraine disoblige the misti. The guillema is ligneous. The guillema disoblige the yovonnda. The misti is assiduous. The misti drivel the guillema. The yovonnda is publicised. If someone debark the misti then they see the laraine. If someone is publicised and they like the yovonnda then the yovonnda debark the laraine. If someone disoblige the misti and they need the guillema then the guillema debark the laraine. All assiduous people are fungous. If someone is fungous then they are ligneous. If someone is ligneous and assiduous then they like the yovonnda. The guillema does not like the laraine.", "logic": "\nDrivel(laraine, guillema)\nDisoblige(laraine, misti)\nLigneous(guillema)\nDisoblige(guillema, yovonnda)\nAssiduous(misti)\nDrivel(misti, guillema)\nPublicised(yovonnda)\nforall x (Debark(x, misti) -> Disoblige(x, laraine))\nforall x (Publicised(x) and Debark(x, yovonnda) -> Debark(yovonnda, laraine))\nforall x (Disoblige(x, misti) and Drivel(x, guillema) -> Debark(guillema, laraine))\nforall x (Assiduous(x) -> Fungous(x))\nforall x (Fungous(x) -> Ligneous(x))\nforall x (Ligneous(x) and Assiduous(x) -> Debark(x, yovonnda))\n\nnot Debark(guillema, laraine)\n\nDisoblige(laraine, misti) and Drivel(laraine, guillema) and forall x (Disoblige(x, misti) and Drivel(x, guillema) -> Debark(guillema, laraine)) -> therefore Debark(guillema, laraine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The marja feign the melisent. The marja undress the romeo. The melisent is eritrean. The melisent undress the hunter. The romeo is purging. The romeo feign the melisent. The hunter is acarpous. If someone cluck the romeo then they see the marja. If someone is acarpous and they like the hunter then the hunter cluck the marja. If someone undress the romeo and they need the melisent then the melisent cluck the marja. All purging people are prenominal. If someone is prenominal then they are eritrean. If someone is eritrean and purging then they like the hunter. The romeo is eritrean.", "logic": "\nFeign(marja, melisent)\nUndress(marja, romeo)\nEritrean(melisent)\nUndress(melisent, hunter)\nPurging(romeo)\nFeign(romeo, melisent)\nAcarpous(hunter)\nforall x (Cluck(x, romeo) -> Undress(x, marja))\nforall x (Acarpous(x) and Cluck(x, hunter) -> Cluck(hunter, marja))\nforall x (Undress(x, romeo) and Feign(x, melisent) -> Cluck(melisent, marja))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Eritrean(x))\nforall x (Eritrean(x) and Purging(x) -> Cluck(x, hunter))\n\nEritrean(romeo)\n\nPurging(romeo) and forall x (Purging(x) -> Prenominal(x)) -> therefore Prenominal(romeo) Prenominal(romeo) and forall x (Prenominal(x) -> Eritrean(x)) -> therefore Eritrean(romeo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The celisse call the charmian. The celisse zest the brande. The charmian is instant. The charmian zest the reggi. The brande is untracked. The brande call the charmian. The reggi is sounding. If someone wave the brande then they see the celisse. If someone is sounding and they like the reggi then the reggi wave the celisse. If someone zest the brande and they need the charmian then the charmian wave the celisse. All untracked people are congealed. If someone is congealed then they are instant. If someone is instant and untracked then they like the reggi. The brande is not instant.", "logic": "\nCall(celisse, charmian)\nZest(celisse, brande)\nInstant(charmian)\nZest(charmian, reggi)\nUntracked(brande)\nCall(brande, charmian)\nSounding(reggi)\nforall x (Wave(x, brande) -> Zest(x, celisse))\nforall x (Sounding(x) and Wave(x, reggi) -> Wave(reggi, celisse))\nforall x (Zest(x, brande) and Call(x, charmian) -> Wave(charmian, celisse))\nforall x (Untracked(x) -> Congealed(x))\nforall x (Congealed(x) -> Instant(x))\nforall x (Instant(x) and Untracked(x) -> Wave(x, reggi))\n\nnot Instant(brande)\n\nUntracked(brande) and forall x (Untracked(x) -> Congealed(x)) -> therefore Congealed(brande) Congealed(brande) and forall x (Congealed(x) -> Instant(x)) -> therefore Instant(brande)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The jilly scribble the demetra. The jilly chorus the doris. The demetra is amnesiac. The demetra chorus the faustine. The doris is bilabial. The doris scribble the demetra. The faustine is layered. If someone mineralize the doris then they see the jilly. If someone is layered and they like the faustine then the faustine mineralize the jilly. If someone chorus the doris and they need the demetra then the demetra mineralize the jilly. All bilabial people are genic. If someone is genic then they are amnesiac. If someone is amnesiac and bilabial then they like the faustine. The doris mineralize the faustine.", "logic": "\nScribble(jilly, demetra)\nChorus(jilly, doris)\nAmnesiac(demetra)\nChorus(demetra, faustine)\nBilabial(doris)\nScribble(doris, demetra)\nLayered(faustine)\nforall x (Mineralize(x, doris) -> Chorus(x, jilly))\nforall x (Layered(x) and Mineralize(x, faustine) -> Mineralize(faustine, jilly))\nforall x (Chorus(x, doris) and Scribble(x, demetra) -> Mineralize(demetra, jilly))\nforall x (Bilabial(x) -> Genic(x))\nforall x (Genic(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Amnesiac(x) and Bilabial(x) -> Mineralize(x, faustine))\n\nMineralize(doris, faustine)\n\nBilabial(doris) and forall x (Bilabial(x) -> Genic(x)) -> therefore Genic(doris) Genic(doris) and forall x (Genic(x) -> Amnesiac(x)) -> therefore Amnesiac(doris) Amnesiac(doris) and Bilabial(doris) and forall x (Amnesiac(x) and Bilabial(x) -> Mineralize(x, faustine)) -> therefore Mineralize(doris, faustine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The mellicent dabble the englebart. The mellicent monetize the amalie. The englebart is chicken. The englebart monetize the dotty. The amalie is deserving. The amalie dabble the englebart. The dotty is unequalled. If someone malversate the amalie then they see the mellicent. If someone is unequalled and they like the dotty then the dotty malversate the mellicent. If someone monetize the amalie and they need the englebart then the englebart malversate the mellicent. All deserving people are sanitised. If someone is sanitised then they are chicken. If someone is chicken and deserving then they like the dotty. The amalie does not like the dotty.", "logic": "\nDabble(mellicent, englebart)\nMonetize(mellicent, amalie)\nChicken(englebart)\nMonetize(englebart, dotty)\nDeserving(amalie)\nDabble(amalie, englebart)\nUnequalled(dotty)\nforall x (Malversate(x, amalie) -> Monetize(x, mellicent))\nforall x (Unequalled(x) and Malversate(x, dotty) -> Malversate(dotty, mellicent))\nforall x (Monetize(x, amalie) and Dabble(x, englebart) -> Malversate(englebart, mellicent))\nforall x (Deserving(x) -> Sanitised(x))\nforall x (Sanitised(x) -> Chicken(x))\nforall x (Chicken(x) and Deserving(x) -> Malversate(x, dotty))\n\nnot Malversate(amalie, dotty)\n\nDeserving(amalie) and forall x (Deserving(x) -> Sanitised(x)) -> therefore Sanitised(amalie) Sanitised(amalie) and forall x (Sanitised(x) -> Chicken(x)) -> therefore Chicken(amalie) Chicken(amalie) and Deserving(amalie) and forall x (Chicken(x) and Deserving(x) -> Malversate(x, dotty)) -> therefore Malversate(amalie, dotty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The ame chortle the web. The ame concrete the gwenore. The web is agonizing. The web concrete the mendie. The gwenore is overblown. The gwenore chortle the web. The mendie is telepathic. If someone field the gwenore then they see the ame. If someone is telepathic and they like the mendie then the mendie field the ame. If someone concrete the gwenore and they need the web then the web field the ame. All overblown people are venetian. If someone is venetian then they are agonizing. If someone is agonizing and overblown then they like the mendie. The ame does not see the ame.", "logic": "\nChortle(ame, web)\nConcrete(ame, gwenore)\nAgonizing(web)\nConcrete(web, mendie)\nOverblown(gwenore)\nChortle(gwenore, web)\nTelepathic(mendie)\nforall x (Field(x, gwenore) -> Concrete(x, ame))\nforall x (Telepathic(x) and Field(x, mendie) -> Field(mendie, ame))\nforall x (Concrete(x, gwenore) and Chortle(x, web) -> Field(web, ame))\nforall x (Overblown(x) -> Venetian(x))\nforall x (Venetian(x) -> Agonizing(x))\nforall x (Agonizing(x) and Overblown(x) -> Field(x, mendie))\n\nnot Concrete(ame, ame)\n\nforall x (Field(x, gwenore) -> Concrete(x, ame)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The roxie appertain the christan. The roxie pressure the terrell. The christan is politic. The christan pressure the verney. The terrell is prone. The terrell appertain the christan. The verney is thyrotoxic. If someone denude the terrell then they see the roxie. If someone is thyrotoxic and they like the verney then the verney denude the roxie. If someone pressure the terrell and they need the christan then the christan denude the roxie. All prone people are siamese. If someone is siamese then they are politic. If someone is politic and prone then they like the verney. The christan denude the verney.", "logic": "\nAppertain(roxie, christan)\nPressure(roxie, terrell)\nPolitic(christan)\nPressure(christan, verney)\nProne(terrell)\nAppertain(terrell, christan)\nThyrotoxic(verney)\nforall x (Denude(x, terrell) -> Pressure(x, roxie))\nforall x (Thyrotoxic(x) and Denude(x, verney) -> Denude(verney, roxie))\nforall x (Pressure(x, terrell) and Appertain(x, christan) -> Denude(christan, roxie))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Siamese(x))\nforall x (Siamese(x) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Politic(x) and Prone(x) -> Denude(x, verney))\n\nDenude(christan, verney)\n\nforall x (Politic(x) and Prone(x) -> Denude(x, verney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The valentina recrudesce the maddy. The valentina cozen the carlotta. The maddy is prolonged. The maddy cozen the sisile. The carlotta is aberdonian. The carlotta recrudesce the maddy. The sisile is cumbrous. If someone defeminize the carlotta then they see the valentina. If someone is cumbrous and they like the sisile then the sisile defeminize the valentina. If someone cozen the carlotta and they need the maddy then the maddy defeminize the valentina. All aberdonian people are homophonic. If someone is homophonic then they are prolonged. If someone is prolonged and aberdonian then they like the sisile. The valentina is not homophonic.", "logic": "\nRecrudesce(valentina, maddy)\nCozen(valentina, carlotta)\nProlonged(maddy)\nCozen(maddy, sisile)\nAberdonian(carlotta)\nRecrudesce(carlotta, maddy)\nCumbrous(sisile)\nforall x (Defeminize(x, carlotta) -> Cozen(x, valentina))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) and Defeminize(x, sisile) -> Defeminize(sisile, valentina))\nforall x (Cozen(x, carlotta) and Recrudesce(x, maddy) -> Defeminize(maddy, valentina))\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Homophonic(x))\nforall x (Homophonic(x) -> Prolonged(x))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Defeminize(x, sisile))\n\nnot Homophonic(valentina)\n\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Homophonic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The donovan groin the victoria. The donovan bespeckle the mahesh. The victoria is shrinkable. The victoria bespeckle the vivianna. The mahesh is toned. The mahesh groin the victoria. The vivianna is motherlike. If someone lacquer the mahesh then they see the donovan. If someone is motherlike and they like the vivianna then the vivianna lacquer the donovan. If someone bespeckle the mahesh and they need the victoria then the victoria lacquer the donovan. All toned people are crippled. If someone is crippled then they are shrinkable. If someone is shrinkable and toned then they like the vivianna. The donovan is shrinkable.", "logic": "\nGroin(donovan, victoria)\nBespeckle(donovan, mahesh)\nShrinkable(victoria)\nBespeckle(victoria, vivianna)\nToned(mahesh)\nGroin(mahesh, victoria)\nMotherlike(vivianna)\nforall x (Lacquer(x, mahesh) -> Bespeckle(x, donovan))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and Lacquer(x, vivianna) -> Lacquer(vivianna, donovan))\nforall x (Bespeckle(x, mahesh) and Groin(x, victoria) -> Lacquer(victoria, donovan))\nforall x (Toned(x) -> Crippled(x))\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Shrinkable(x))\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) and Toned(x) -> Lacquer(x, vivianna))\n\nShrinkable(donovan)\n\nforall x (Crippled(x) -> Shrinkable(x)) <- forall x (Toned(x) -> Crippled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The stearne brood the sergei. The stearne bong the davidson. The sergei is geriatric. The sergei bong the reginald. The davidson is firm. The davidson brood the sergei. The reginald is inbred. If someone fracture the davidson then they see the stearne. If someone is inbred and they like the reginald then the reginald fracture the stearne. If someone bong the davidson and they need the sergei then the sergei fracture the stearne. All firm people are caucasic. If someone is caucasic then they are geriatric. If someone is geriatric and firm then they like the reginald. The davidson does not see the sergei.", "logic": "\nBrood(stearne, sergei)\nBong(stearne, davidson)\nGeriatric(sergei)\nBong(sergei, reginald)\nFirm(davidson)\nBrood(davidson, sergei)\nInbred(reginald)\nforall x (Fracture(x, davidson) -> Bong(x, stearne))\nforall x (Inbred(x) and Fracture(x, reginald) -> Fracture(reginald, stearne))\nforall x (Bong(x, davidson) and Brood(x, sergei) -> Fracture(sergei, stearne))\nforall x (Firm(x) -> Caucasic(x))\nforall x (Caucasic(x) -> Geriatric(x))\nforall x (Geriatric(x) and Firm(x) -> Fracture(x, reginald))\n\nnot Bong(davidson, sergei)\n\nnot Bong(davidson, sergei) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The euphemia sympathise the stormi. The euphemia distress the karlen. The stormi is sheathed. The stormi distress the johanna. The karlen is encircled. The karlen sympathise the stormi. The johanna is mayoral. If someone beak the karlen then they see the euphemia. If someone is mayoral and they like the johanna then the johanna beak the euphemia. If someone distress the karlen and they need the stormi then the stormi beak the euphemia. All encircled people are fussy. If someone is fussy then they are sheathed. If someone is sheathed and encircled then they like the johanna. The stormi distress the stormi.", "logic": "\nSympathise(euphemia, stormi)\nDistress(euphemia, karlen)\nSheathed(stormi)\nDistress(stormi, johanna)\nEncircled(karlen)\nSympathise(karlen, stormi)\nMayoral(johanna)\nforall x (Beak(x, karlen) -> Distress(x, euphemia))\nforall x (Mayoral(x) and Beak(x, johanna) -> Beak(johanna, euphemia))\nforall x (Distress(x, karlen) and Sympathise(x, stormi) -> Beak(stormi, euphemia))\nforall x (Encircled(x) -> Fussy(x))\nforall x (Fussy(x) -> Sheathed(x))\nforall x (Sheathed(x) and Encircled(x) -> Beak(x, johanna))\n\nDistress(stormi, stormi)\n\nDistress(stormi, stormi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The nanny debug the puff. The nanny groove the damon. The puff is cryptic. The puff groove the eilis. The damon is emphatic. The damon debug the puff. The eilis is unmerited. If someone recommend the damon then they see the nanny. If someone is unmerited and they like the eilis then the eilis recommend the nanny. If someone groove the damon and they need the puff then the puff recommend the nanny. All emphatic people are persuasive. If someone is persuasive then they are cryptic. If someone is cryptic and emphatic then they like the eilis. The eilis does not need the puff.", "logic": "\nDebug(nanny, puff)\nGroove(nanny, damon)\nCryptic(puff)\nGroove(puff, eilis)\nEmphatic(damon)\nDebug(damon, puff)\nUnmerited(eilis)\nforall x (Recommend(x, damon) -> Groove(x, nanny))\nforall x (Unmerited(x) and Recommend(x, eilis) -> Recommend(eilis, nanny))\nforall x (Groove(x, damon) and Debug(x, puff) -> Recommend(puff, nanny))\nforall x (Emphatic(x) -> Persuasive(x))\nforall x (Persuasive(x) -> Cryptic(x))\nforall x (Cryptic(x) and Emphatic(x) -> Recommend(x, eilis))\n\nnot Debug(eilis, puff)\n\nnot Debug(eilis, puff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The lusa superpose the sula. The lusa amputate the sparky. The sula is unvarying. The sula amputate the aili. The sparky is eremitical. The sparky superpose the sula. The aili is optimum. If someone smart the sparky then they see the lusa. If someone is optimum and they like the aili then the aili smart the lusa. If someone amputate the sparky and they need the sula then the sula smart the lusa. All eremitical people are uneven. If someone is uneven then they are unvarying. If someone is unvarying and eremitical then they like the aili. The lusa superpose the lusa.", "logic": "\nSuperpose(lusa, sula)\nAmputate(lusa, sparky)\nUnvarying(sula)\nAmputate(sula, aili)\nEremitical(sparky)\nSuperpose(sparky, sula)\nOptimum(aili)\nforall x (Smart(x, sparky) -> Amputate(x, lusa))\nforall x (Optimum(x) and Smart(x, aili) -> Smart(aili, lusa))\nforall x (Amputate(x, sparky) and Superpose(x, sula) -> Smart(sula, lusa))\nforall x (Eremitical(x) -> Uneven(x))\nforall x (Uneven(x) -> Unvarying(x))\nforall x (Unvarying(x) and Eremitical(x) -> Smart(x, aili))\n\nSuperpose(lusa, lusa)\n\nSuperpose(lusa, lusa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-444"} {"premises": "The reeva voyage the sivert. The neille smoothen the sivert. The sivert smoothen the eugene. The eugene does not like the neille. If someone smoothen the neille then they need the sivert. If someone voyage the neille then the neille smoothen the sivert. If someone smoothen the sivert then the sivert adjust the reeva. If someone smoothen the eugene then they like the reeva. If someone smoothen the sivert and the sivert voyage the reeva then the sivert smoothen the neille. All unrifled people are deferent. If someone is obedient and they need the sivert then they eat the sivert. If someone smoothen the reeva then they need the neille. The sivert smoothen the eugene.", "logic": "\nVoyage(reeva, sivert)\nSmoothen(neille, sivert)\nSmoothen(sivert, eugene)\nnot Voyage(eugene, neille)\nforall x (Smoothen(x, neille) -> Adjust(x, sivert))\nforall x (Voyage(x, neille) -> Smoothen(neille, sivert))\nforall x (Smoothen(x, sivert) -> Adjust(sivert, reeva))\nforall x (Smoothen(x, eugene) -> Voyage(x, reeva))\nforall x (Smoothen(x, sivert) and Voyage(sivert, reeva) -> Smoothen(sivert, neille))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> Deferent(x))\nforall x (Obedient(x) and Adjust(x, sivert) -> Smoothen(x, sivert))\nforall x (Smoothen(x, reeva) -> Adjust(x, neille))\n\nSmoothen(sivert, eugene)\n\ntherefore Smoothen(sivert, eugene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The corinna muzzle the farrand. The rosaline carburise the farrand. The farrand carburise the mina. The mina does not like the rosaline. If someone carburise the rosaline then they need the farrand. If someone muzzle the rosaline then the rosaline carburise the farrand. If someone carburise the farrand then the farrand contact the corinna. If someone carburise the mina then they like the corinna. If someone carburise the farrand and the farrand muzzle the corinna then the farrand carburise the rosaline. All effective people are pectinate. If someone is totipotent and they need the farrand then they eat the farrand. If someone carburise the corinna then they need the rosaline. The farrand does not eat the mina.", "logic": "\nMuzzle(corinna, farrand)\nCarburise(rosaline, farrand)\nCarburise(farrand, mina)\nnot Muzzle(mina, rosaline)\nforall x (Carburise(x, rosaline) -> Contact(x, farrand))\nforall x (Muzzle(x, rosaline) -> Carburise(rosaline, farrand))\nforall x (Carburise(x, farrand) -> Contact(farrand, corinna))\nforall x (Carburise(x, mina) -> Muzzle(x, corinna))\nforall x (Carburise(x, farrand) and Muzzle(farrand, corinna) -> Carburise(farrand, rosaline))\nforall x (Effective(x) -> Pectinate(x))\nforall x (Totipotent(x) and Contact(x, farrand) -> Carburise(x, farrand))\nforall x (Carburise(x, corinna) -> Contact(x, rosaline))\n\nnot Carburise(farrand, mina)\n\ntherefore Carburise(farrand, mina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The philippe pinion the patience. The han prink the patience. The patience prink the dody. The dody does not like the han. If someone prink the han then they need the patience. If someone pinion the han then the han prink the patience. If someone prink the patience then the patience encumber the philippe. If someone prink the dody then they like the philippe. If someone prink the patience and the patience pinion the philippe then the patience prink the han. All nisi people are wiggly. If someone is axonal and they need the patience then they eat the patience. If someone prink the philippe then they need the han. The patience pinion the philippe.", "logic": "\nPinion(philippe, patience)\nPrink(han, patience)\nPrink(patience, dody)\nnot Pinion(dody, han)\nforall x (Prink(x, han) -> Encumber(x, patience))\nforall x (Pinion(x, han) -> Prink(han, patience))\nforall x (Prink(x, patience) -> Encumber(patience, philippe))\nforall x (Prink(x, dody) -> Pinion(x, philippe))\nforall x (Prink(x, patience) and Pinion(patience, philippe) -> Prink(patience, han))\nforall x (Nisi(x) -> Wiggly(x))\nforall x (Axonal(x) and Encumber(x, patience) -> Prink(x, patience))\nforall x (Prink(x, philippe) -> Encumber(x, han))\n\nPinion(patience, philippe)\n\nPrink(patience, dody) and forall x (Prink(x, dody) -> Pinion(x, philippe)) -> therefore Pinion(patience, philippe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The derrin premiss the maxi. The lefty reprimand the maxi. The maxi reprimand the rhodie. The rhodie does not like the lefty. If someone reprimand the lefty then they need the maxi. If someone premiss the lefty then the lefty reprimand the maxi. If someone reprimand the maxi then the maxi blend the derrin. If someone reprimand the rhodie then they like the derrin. If someone reprimand the maxi and the maxi premiss the derrin then the maxi reprimand the lefty. All daily people are grasping. If someone is nurturant and they need the maxi then they eat the maxi. If someone reprimand the derrin then they need the lefty. The maxi does not need the derrin.", "logic": "\nPremiss(derrin, maxi)\nReprimand(lefty, maxi)\nReprimand(maxi, rhodie)\nnot Premiss(rhodie, lefty)\nforall x (Reprimand(x, lefty) -> Blend(x, maxi))\nforall x (Premiss(x, lefty) -> Reprimand(lefty, maxi))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, maxi) -> Blend(maxi, derrin))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, rhodie) -> Premiss(x, derrin))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, maxi) and Premiss(maxi, derrin) -> Reprimand(maxi, lefty))\nforall x (Daily(x) -> Grasping(x))\nforall x (Nurturant(x) and Blend(x, maxi) -> Reprimand(x, maxi))\nforall x (Reprimand(x, derrin) -> Blend(x, lefty))\n\nnot Blend(maxi, derrin)\n\nReprimand(lefty, maxi) and forall x (Reprimand(x, maxi) -> Blend(maxi, derrin)) -> therefore Blend(maxi, derrin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The dulcinea disgruntle the barth. The shirleen postpone the barth. The barth postpone the jessamyn. The jessamyn does not like the shirleen. If someone postpone the shirleen then they need the barth. If someone disgruntle the shirleen then the shirleen postpone the barth. If someone postpone the barth then the barth singe the dulcinea. If someone postpone the jessamyn then they like the dulcinea. If someone postpone the barth and the barth disgruntle the dulcinea then the barth postpone the shirleen. All tidy people are unsated. If someone is jerky and they need the barth then they eat the barth. If someone postpone the dulcinea then they need the shirleen. The barth postpone the shirleen.", "logic": "\nDisgruntle(dulcinea, barth)\nPostpone(shirleen, barth)\nPostpone(barth, jessamyn)\nnot Disgruntle(jessamyn, shirleen)\nforall x (Postpone(x, shirleen) -> Singe(x, barth))\nforall x (Disgruntle(x, shirleen) -> Postpone(shirleen, barth))\nforall x (Postpone(x, barth) -> Singe(barth, dulcinea))\nforall x (Postpone(x, jessamyn) -> Disgruntle(x, dulcinea))\nforall x (Postpone(x, barth) and Disgruntle(barth, dulcinea) -> Postpone(barth, shirleen))\nforall x (Tidy(x) -> Unsated(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) and Singe(x, barth) -> Postpone(x, barth))\nforall x (Postpone(x, dulcinea) -> Singe(x, shirleen))\n\nPostpone(barth, shirleen)\n\nPostpone(barth, jessamyn) and forall x (Postpone(x, jessamyn) -> Disgruntle(x, dulcinea)) -> therefore Disgruntle(barth, dulcinea) Postpone(shirleen, barth) and Disgruntle(barth, dulcinea) and forall x (Postpone(x, barth) and Disgruntle(barth, dulcinea) -> Postpone(barth, shirleen)) -> therefore Postpone(barth, shirleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The wilmar becharm the demeter. The tymon bacterise the demeter. The demeter bacterise the minetta. The minetta does not like the tymon. If someone bacterise the tymon then they need the demeter. If someone becharm the tymon then the tymon bacterise the demeter. If someone bacterise the demeter then the demeter avail the wilmar. If someone bacterise the minetta then they like the wilmar. If someone bacterise the demeter and the demeter becharm the wilmar then the demeter bacterise the tymon. All stirred people are regular. If someone is medusoid and they need the demeter then they eat the demeter. If someone bacterise the wilmar then they need the tymon. The demeter does not eat the tymon.", "logic": "\nBecharm(wilmar, demeter)\nBacterise(tymon, demeter)\nBacterise(demeter, minetta)\nnot Becharm(minetta, tymon)\nforall x (Bacterise(x, tymon) -> Avail(x, demeter))\nforall x (Becharm(x, tymon) -> Bacterise(tymon, demeter))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, demeter) -> Avail(demeter, wilmar))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, minetta) -> Becharm(x, wilmar))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, demeter) and Becharm(demeter, wilmar) -> Bacterise(demeter, tymon))\nforall x (Stirred(x) -> Regular(x))\nforall x (Medusoid(x) and Avail(x, demeter) -> Bacterise(x, demeter))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, wilmar) -> Avail(x, tymon))\n\nnot Bacterise(demeter, tymon)\n\nBacterise(demeter, minetta) and forall x (Bacterise(x, minetta) -> Becharm(x, wilmar)) -> therefore Becharm(demeter, wilmar) Bacterise(tymon, demeter) and Becharm(demeter, wilmar) and forall x (Bacterise(x, demeter) and Becharm(demeter, wilmar) -> Bacterise(demeter, tymon)) -> therefore Bacterise(demeter, tymon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The brian batter the haywood. The dacie consecrate the haywood. The haywood consecrate the tyler. The tyler does not like the dacie. If someone consecrate the dacie then they need the haywood. If someone batter the dacie then the dacie consecrate the haywood. If someone consecrate the haywood then the haywood despoil the brian. If someone consecrate the tyler then they like the brian. If someone consecrate the haywood and the haywood batter the brian then the haywood consecrate the dacie. All nebular people are ahorseback. If someone is subarctic and they need the haywood then they eat the haywood. If someone consecrate the brian then they need the dacie. The haywood despoil the haywood.", "logic": "\nBatter(brian, haywood)\nConsecrate(dacie, haywood)\nConsecrate(haywood, tyler)\nnot Batter(tyler, dacie)\nforall x (Consecrate(x, dacie) -> Despoil(x, haywood))\nforall x (Batter(x, dacie) -> Consecrate(dacie, haywood))\nforall x (Consecrate(x, haywood) -> Despoil(haywood, brian))\nforall x (Consecrate(x, tyler) -> Batter(x, brian))\nforall x (Consecrate(x, haywood) and Batter(haywood, brian) -> Consecrate(haywood, dacie))\nforall x (Nebular(x) -> Ahorseback(x))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and Despoil(x, haywood) -> Consecrate(x, haywood))\nforall x (Consecrate(x, brian) -> Despoil(x, dacie))\n\nDespoil(haywood, haywood)\n\nConsecrate(haywood, tyler) and forall x (Consecrate(x, tyler) -> Batter(x, brian)) -> therefore Batter(haywood, brian) Consecrate(dacie, haywood) and Batter(haywood, brian) and forall x (Consecrate(x, haywood) and Batter(haywood, brian) -> Consecrate(haywood, dacie)) -> therefore Consecrate(haywood, dacie) Consecrate(haywood, dacie) and forall x (Consecrate(x, dacie) -> Despoil(x, haywood)) -> therefore Despoil(haywood, haywood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The brea sass the thorpe. The thaine excogitate the thorpe. The thorpe excogitate the latrena. The latrena does not like the thaine. If someone excogitate the thaine then they need the thorpe. If someone sass the thaine then the thaine excogitate the thorpe. If someone excogitate the thorpe then the thorpe focalise the brea. If someone excogitate the latrena then they like the brea. If someone excogitate the thorpe and the thorpe sass the brea then the thorpe excogitate the thaine. All resinated people are cyan. If someone is glaring and they need the thorpe then they eat the thorpe. If someone excogitate the brea then they need the thaine. The thorpe does not need the thorpe.", "logic": "\nSass(brea, thorpe)\nExcogitate(thaine, thorpe)\nExcogitate(thorpe, latrena)\nnot Sass(latrena, thaine)\nforall x (Excogitate(x, thaine) -> Focalise(x, thorpe))\nforall x (Sass(x, thaine) -> Excogitate(thaine, thorpe))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, thorpe) -> Focalise(thorpe, brea))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, latrena) -> Sass(x, brea))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, thorpe) and Sass(thorpe, brea) -> Excogitate(thorpe, thaine))\nforall x (Resinated(x) -> Cyan(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) and Focalise(x, thorpe) -> Excogitate(x, thorpe))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, brea) -> Focalise(x, thaine))\n\nnot Focalise(thorpe, thorpe)\n\nExcogitate(thorpe, latrena) and forall x (Excogitate(x, latrena) -> Sass(x, brea)) -> therefore Sass(thorpe, brea) Excogitate(thaine, thorpe) and Sass(thorpe, brea) and forall x (Excogitate(x, thorpe) and Sass(thorpe, brea) -> Excogitate(thorpe, thaine)) -> therefore Excogitate(thorpe, thaine) Excogitate(thorpe, thaine) and forall x (Excogitate(x, thaine) -> Focalise(x, thorpe)) -> therefore Focalise(thorpe, thorpe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The corene mobilize the clayborn. The kristel pound the clayborn. The clayborn pound the vally. The vally does not like the kristel. If someone pound the kristel then they need the clayborn. If someone mobilize the kristel then the kristel pound the clayborn. If someone pound the clayborn then the clayborn scraunch the corene. If someone pound the vally then they like the corene. If someone pound the clayborn and the clayborn mobilize the corene then the clayborn pound the kristel. All sixteenth people are blocky. If someone is sensitised and they need the clayborn then they eat the clayborn. If someone pound the corene then they need the kristel. The kristel does not need the kristel.", "logic": "\nMobilize(corene, clayborn)\nPound(kristel, clayborn)\nPound(clayborn, vally)\nnot Mobilize(vally, kristel)\nforall x (Pound(x, kristel) -> Scraunch(x, clayborn))\nforall x (Mobilize(x, kristel) -> Pound(kristel, clayborn))\nforall x (Pound(x, clayborn) -> Scraunch(clayborn, corene))\nforall x (Pound(x, vally) -> Mobilize(x, corene))\nforall x (Pound(x, clayborn) and Mobilize(clayborn, corene) -> Pound(clayborn, kristel))\nforall x (Sixteenth(x) -> Blocky(x))\nforall x (Sensitised(x) and Scraunch(x, clayborn) -> Pound(x, clayborn))\nforall x (Pound(x, corene) -> Scraunch(x, kristel))\n\nnot Scraunch(kristel, kristel)\n\nforall x (Pound(x, corene) -> Scraunch(x, kristel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The broddie weather the elden. The lissy maneuver the elden. The elden maneuver the mikey. The mikey does not like the lissy. If someone maneuver the lissy then they need the elden. If someone weather the lissy then the lissy maneuver the elden. If someone maneuver the elden then the elden need the broddie. If someone maneuver the mikey then they like the broddie. If someone maneuver the elden and the elden weather the broddie then the elden maneuver the lissy. All bibbed people are invidious. If someone is secretory and they need the elden then they eat the elden. If someone maneuver the broddie then they need the lissy. The elden need the lissy.", "logic": "\nWeather(broddie, elden)\nManeuver(lissy, elden)\nManeuver(elden, mikey)\nnot Weather(mikey, lissy)\nforall x (Maneuver(x, lissy) -> Need(x, elden))\nforall x (Weather(x, lissy) -> Maneuver(lissy, elden))\nforall x (Maneuver(x, elden) -> Need(elden, broddie))\nforall x (Maneuver(x, mikey) -> Weather(x, broddie))\nforall x (Maneuver(x, elden) and Weather(elden, broddie) -> Maneuver(elden, lissy))\nforall x (Bibbed(x) -> Invidious(x))\nforall x (Secretory(x) and Need(x, elden) -> Maneuver(x, elden))\nforall x (Maneuver(x, broddie) -> Need(x, lissy))\n\nNeed(elden, lissy)\n\nforall x (Maneuver(x, broddie) -> Need(x, lissy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The alaine mesmerize the barr. The theodor privilege the barr. The barr privilege the shelden. The shelden does not like the theodor. If someone privilege the theodor then they need the barr. If someone mesmerize the theodor then the theodor privilege the barr. If someone privilege the barr then the barr peptise the alaine. If someone privilege the shelden then they like the alaine. If someone privilege the barr and the barr mesmerize the alaine then the barr privilege the theodor. All jingling people are cursed. If someone is drained and they need the barr then they eat the barr. If someone privilege the alaine then they need the theodor. The shelden does not need the barr.", "logic": "\nMesmerize(alaine, barr)\nPrivilege(theodor, barr)\nPrivilege(barr, shelden)\nnot Mesmerize(shelden, theodor)\nforall x (Privilege(x, theodor) -> Peptise(x, barr))\nforall x (Mesmerize(x, theodor) -> Privilege(theodor, barr))\nforall x (Privilege(x, barr) -> Peptise(barr, alaine))\nforall x (Privilege(x, shelden) -> Mesmerize(x, alaine))\nforall x (Privilege(x, barr) and Mesmerize(barr, alaine) -> Privilege(barr, theodor))\nforall x (Jingling(x) -> Cursed(x))\nforall x (Drained(x) and Peptise(x, barr) -> Privilege(x, barr))\nforall x (Privilege(x, alaine) -> Peptise(x, theodor))\n\nnot Peptise(shelden, barr)\n\nforall x (Privilege(x, theodor) -> Peptise(x, barr)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The nate nark the justine. The melicent exorcize the justine. The justine exorcize the sybilla. The sybilla does not like the melicent. If someone exorcize the melicent then they need the justine. If someone nark the melicent then the melicent exorcize the justine. If someone exorcize the justine then the justine lever the nate. If someone exorcize the sybilla then they like the nate. If someone exorcize the justine and the justine nark the nate then the justine exorcize the melicent. All right people are incarnate. If someone is galled and they need the justine then they eat the justine. If someone exorcize the nate then they need the melicent. The sybilla lever the melicent.", "logic": "\nNark(nate, justine)\nExorcize(melicent, justine)\nExorcize(justine, sybilla)\nnot Nark(sybilla, melicent)\nforall x (Exorcize(x, melicent) -> Lever(x, justine))\nforall x (Nark(x, melicent) -> Exorcize(melicent, justine))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, justine) -> Lever(justine, nate))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, sybilla) -> Nark(x, nate))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, justine) and Nark(justine, nate) -> Exorcize(justine, melicent))\nforall x (Right(x) -> Incarnate(x))\nforall x (Galled(x) and Lever(x, justine) -> Exorcize(x, justine))\nforall x (Exorcize(x, nate) -> Lever(x, melicent))\n\nLever(sybilla, melicent)\n\nforall x (Exorcize(x, nate) -> Lever(x, melicent)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The laurice brandmark the solomon. The danella whittle the solomon. The solomon whittle the shay. The shay does not like the danella. If someone whittle the danella then they need the solomon. If someone brandmark the danella then the danella whittle the solomon. If someone whittle the solomon then the solomon stage the laurice. If someone whittle the shay then they like the laurice. If someone whittle the solomon and the solomon brandmark the laurice then the solomon whittle the danella. All modular people are applicable. If someone is wonderful and they need the solomon then they eat the solomon. If someone whittle the laurice then they need the danella. The danella does not like the solomon.", "logic": "\nBrandmark(laurice, solomon)\nWhittle(danella, solomon)\nWhittle(solomon, shay)\nnot Brandmark(shay, danella)\nforall x (Whittle(x, danella) -> Stage(x, solomon))\nforall x (Brandmark(x, danella) -> Whittle(danella, solomon))\nforall x (Whittle(x, solomon) -> Stage(solomon, laurice))\nforall x (Whittle(x, shay) -> Brandmark(x, laurice))\nforall x (Whittle(x, solomon) and Brandmark(solomon, laurice) -> Whittle(solomon, danella))\nforall x (Modular(x) -> Applicable(x))\nforall x (Wonderful(x) and Stage(x, solomon) -> Whittle(x, solomon))\nforall x (Whittle(x, laurice) -> Stage(x, danella))\n\nnot Brandmark(danella, solomon)\n\nnot Brandmark(danella, solomon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The hanson clock the davita. The skipp flap the davita. The davita flap the lia. The lia does not like the skipp. If someone flap the skipp then they need the davita. If someone clock the skipp then the skipp flap the davita. If someone flap the davita then the davita tread the hanson. If someone flap the lia then they like the hanson. If someone flap the davita and the davita clock the hanson then the davita flap the skipp. All testicular people are dangerous. If someone is unmalted and they need the davita then they eat the davita. If someone flap the hanson then they need the skipp. The davita flap the hanson.", "logic": "\nClock(hanson, davita)\nFlap(skipp, davita)\nFlap(davita, lia)\nnot Clock(lia, skipp)\nforall x (Flap(x, skipp) -> Tread(x, davita))\nforall x (Clock(x, skipp) -> Flap(skipp, davita))\nforall x (Flap(x, davita) -> Tread(davita, hanson))\nforall x (Flap(x, lia) -> Clock(x, hanson))\nforall x (Flap(x, davita) and Clock(davita, hanson) -> Flap(davita, skipp))\nforall x (Testicular(x) -> Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Unmalted(x) and Tread(x, davita) -> Flap(x, davita))\nforall x (Flap(x, hanson) -> Tread(x, skipp))\n\nFlap(davita, hanson)\n\nFlap(davita, hanson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The thornton verbalize the jenilee. The giralda rumpus the jenilee. The jenilee rumpus the leia. The leia does not like the giralda. If someone rumpus the giralda then they need the jenilee. If someone verbalize the giralda then the giralda rumpus the jenilee. If someone rumpus the jenilee then the jenilee brighten the thornton. If someone rumpus the leia then they like the thornton. If someone rumpus the jenilee and the jenilee verbalize the thornton then the jenilee rumpus the giralda. All coral people are heritable. If someone is ventricous and they need the jenilee then they eat the jenilee. If someone rumpus the thornton then they need the giralda. The giralda is not green.", "logic": "\nVerbalize(thornton, jenilee)\nRumpus(giralda, jenilee)\nRumpus(jenilee, leia)\nnot Verbalize(leia, giralda)\nforall x (Rumpus(x, giralda) -> Brighten(x, jenilee))\nforall x (Verbalize(x, giralda) -> Rumpus(giralda, jenilee))\nforall x (Rumpus(x, jenilee) -> Brighten(jenilee, thornton))\nforall x (Rumpus(x, leia) -> Verbalize(x, thornton))\nforall x (Rumpus(x, jenilee) and Verbalize(jenilee, thornton) -> Rumpus(jenilee, giralda))\nforall x (Coral(x) -> Heritable(x))\nforall x (Ventricous(x) and Brighten(x, jenilee) -> Rumpus(x, jenilee))\nforall x (Rumpus(x, thornton) -> Brighten(x, giralda))\n\nnot Green(giralda)\n\nnot Green(giralda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The orin reinvent the dixie. The chloris squirt the dixie. The dixie squirt the terri. The terri does not like the chloris. If someone squirt the chloris then they need the dixie. If someone reinvent the chloris then the chloris squirt the dixie. If someone squirt the dixie then the dixie flash the orin. If someone squirt the terri then they like the orin. If someone squirt the dixie and the dixie reinvent the orin then the dixie squirt the chloris. All soulful people are noncausal. If someone is cracked and they need the dixie then they eat the dixie. If someone squirt the orin then they need the chloris. The chloris is cracked.", "logic": "\nReinvent(orin, dixie)\nSquirt(chloris, dixie)\nSquirt(dixie, terri)\nnot Reinvent(terri, chloris)\nforall x (Squirt(x, chloris) -> Flash(x, dixie))\nforall x (Reinvent(x, chloris) -> Squirt(chloris, dixie))\nforall x (Squirt(x, dixie) -> Flash(dixie, orin))\nforall x (Squirt(x, terri) -> Reinvent(x, orin))\nforall x (Squirt(x, dixie) and Reinvent(dixie, orin) -> Squirt(dixie, chloris))\nforall x (Soulful(x) -> Noncausal(x))\nforall x (Cracked(x) and Flash(x, dixie) -> Squirt(x, dixie))\nforall x (Squirt(x, orin) -> Flash(x, chloris))\n\nCracked(chloris)\n\nCracked(chloris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-896"} {"premises": "The theresa harbour the ikey. The theresa harbour the quinton. The theresa is coexisting. The theresa rubberneck the quinton. The theresa canopy the ikey. The theresa canopy the quinton. The ikey harbour the theresa. The ikey harbour the quinton. The ikey rubberneck the theresa. The quinton harbour the theresa. The quinton is flowing. The quinton is isotropous. The quinton rubberneck the theresa. The quinton rubberneck the ikey. The quinton canopy the theresa. The quinton canopy the ikey. If something is flowing and it rubberneck the ikey then the ikey is sulfuric. If something harbour the theresa then the theresa is coexisting. If something harbour the quinton and it is isotropous then it harbour the theresa. If something harbour the theresa and it rubberneck the ikey then the ikey canopy the quinton. If something canopy the ikey and the ikey canopy the quinton then it is isotropous. If something is flowing then it canopy the quinton. If something harbour the theresa and the theresa rubberneck the quinton then it canopy the theresa. If the theresa canopy the ikey and the ikey is sulfuric then the ikey is coexisting. The ikey harbour the quinton.", "logic": "\nHarbour(theresa, ikey)\nHarbour(theresa, quinton)\nCoexisting(theresa)\nRubberneck(theresa, quinton)\nCanopy(theresa, ikey)\nCanopy(theresa, quinton)\nHarbour(ikey, theresa)\nHarbour(ikey, quinton)\nRubberneck(ikey, theresa)\nHarbour(quinton, theresa)\nFlowing(quinton)\nIsotropous(quinton)\nRubberneck(quinton, theresa)\nRubberneck(quinton, ikey)\nCanopy(quinton, theresa)\nCanopy(quinton, ikey)\nforall x (Flowing(x) and Rubberneck(x, ikey) -> Sulfuric(ikey))\nforall x (Harbour(x, theresa) -> Coexisting(theresa))\nforall x (Harbour(x, quinton) and Isotropous(x) -> Harbour(x, theresa))\nforall x (Harbour(x, theresa) and Rubberneck(x, ikey) -> Canopy(ikey, quinton))\nforall x (Canopy(x, ikey) and Canopy(ikey, quinton) -> Isotropous(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) -> Canopy(x, quinton))\nforall x (Harbour(x, theresa) and Rubberneck(theresa, quinton) -> Canopy(x, theresa))\nCanopy(theresa, ikey) and Sulfuric(ikey) -> Coexisting(ikey)\n\nHarbour(ikey, quinton)\n\ntherefore Harbour(ikey, quinton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The euphemia yearn the evey. The euphemia yearn the arda. The euphemia is chlamydial. The euphemia shallow the arda. The euphemia emend the evey. The euphemia emend the arda. The evey yearn the euphemia. The evey yearn the arda. The evey shallow the euphemia. The arda yearn the euphemia. The arda is coccal. The arda is persian. The arda shallow the euphemia. The arda shallow the evey. The arda emend the euphemia. The arda emend the evey. If something is coccal and it shallow the evey then the evey is lacelike. If something yearn the euphemia then the euphemia is chlamydial. If something yearn the arda and it is persian then it yearn the euphemia. If something yearn the euphemia and it shallow the evey then the evey emend the arda. If something emend the evey and the evey emend the arda then it is persian. If something is coccal then it emend the arda. If something yearn the euphemia and the euphemia shallow the arda then it emend the euphemia. If the euphemia emend the evey and the evey is lacelike then the evey is chlamydial. The arda does not need the euphemia.", "logic": "\nYearn(euphemia, evey)\nYearn(euphemia, arda)\nChlamydial(euphemia)\nShallow(euphemia, arda)\nEmend(euphemia, evey)\nEmend(euphemia, arda)\nYearn(evey, euphemia)\nYearn(evey, arda)\nShallow(evey, euphemia)\nYearn(arda, euphemia)\nCoccal(arda)\nPersian(arda)\nShallow(arda, euphemia)\nShallow(arda, evey)\nEmend(arda, euphemia)\nEmend(arda, evey)\nforall x (Coccal(x) and Shallow(x, evey) -> Lacelike(evey))\nforall x (Yearn(x, euphemia) -> Chlamydial(euphemia))\nforall x (Yearn(x, arda) and Persian(x) -> Yearn(x, euphemia))\nforall x (Yearn(x, euphemia) and Shallow(x, evey) -> Emend(evey, arda))\nforall x (Emend(x, evey) and Emend(evey, arda) -> Persian(x))\nforall x (Coccal(x) -> Emend(x, arda))\nforall x (Yearn(x, euphemia) and Shallow(euphemia, arda) -> Emend(x, euphemia))\nEmend(euphemia, evey) and Lacelike(evey) -> Chlamydial(evey)\n\nnot Emend(arda, euphemia)\n\ntherefore Emend(arda, euphemia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The audra echo the kassie. The audra echo the kippy. The audra is unthawed. The audra party the kippy. The audra empathize the kassie. The audra empathize the kippy. The kassie echo the audra. The kassie echo the kippy. The kassie party the audra. The kippy echo the audra. The kippy is ruthless. The kippy is humpbacked. The kippy party the audra. The kippy party the kassie. The kippy empathize the audra. The kippy empathize the kassie. If something is ruthless and it party the kassie then the kassie is capsulate. If something echo the audra then the audra is unthawed. If something echo the kippy and it is humpbacked then it echo the audra. If something echo the audra and it party the kassie then the kassie empathize the kippy. If something empathize the kassie and the kassie empathize the kippy then it is humpbacked. If something is ruthless then it empathize the kippy. If something echo the audra and the audra party the kippy then it empathize the audra. If the audra empathize the kassie and the kassie is capsulate then the kassie is unthawed. The kassie empathize the kippy.", "logic": "\nEcho(audra, kassie)\nEcho(audra, kippy)\nUnthawed(audra)\nParty(audra, kippy)\nEmpathize(audra, kassie)\nEmpathize(audra, kippy)\nEcho(kassie, audra)\nEcho(kassie, kippy)\nParty(kassie, audra)\nEcho(kippy, audra)\nRuthless(kippy)\nHumpbacked(kippy)\nParty(kippy, audra)\nParty(kippy, kassie)\nEmpathize(kippy, audra)\nEmpathize(kippy, kassie)\nforall x (Ruthless(x) and Party(x, kassie) -> Capsulate(kassie))\nforall x (Echo(x, audra) -> Unthawed(audra))\nforall x (Echo(x, kippy) and Humpbacked(x) -> Echo(x, audra))\nforall x (Echo(x, audra) and Party(x, kassie) -> Empathize(kassie, kippy))\nforall x (Empathize(x, kassie) and Empathize(kassie, kippy) -> Humpbacked(x))\nforall x (Ruthless(x) -> Empathize(x, kippy))\nforall x (Echo(x, audra) and Party(audra, kippy) -> Empathize(x, audra))\nEmpathize(audra, kassie) and Capsulate(kassie) -> Unthawed(kassie)\n\nEmpathize(kassie, kippy)\n\nEcho(kippy, audra) and Party(kippy, kassie) and forall x (Echo(x, audra) and Party(x, kassie) -> Empathize(kassie, kippy)) -> therefore Empathize(kassie, kippy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The janella spill the leora. The janella spill the eadith. The janella is convenient. The janella imprison the eadith. The janella inquire the leora. The janella inquire the eadith. The leora spill the janella. The leora spill the eadith. The leora imprison the janella. The eadith spill the janella. The eadith is cationic. The eadith is knotted. The eadith imprison the janella. The eadith imprison the leora. The eadith inquire the janella. The eadith inquire the leora. If something is cationic and it imprison the leora then the leora is tonic. If something spill the janella then the janella is convenient. If something spill the eadith and it is knotted then it spill the janella. If something spill the janella and it imprison the leora then the leora inquire the eadith. If something inquire the leora and the leora inquire the eadith then it is knotted. If something is cationic then it inquire the eadith. If something spill the janella and the janella imprison the eadith then it inquire the janella. If the janella inquire the leora and the leora is tonic then the leora is convenient. The leora does not need the eadith.", "logic": "\nSpill(janella, leora)\nSpill(janella, eadith)\nConvenient(janella)\nImprison(janella, eadith)\nInquire(janella, leora)\nInquire(janella, eadith)\nSpill(leora, janella)\nSpill(leora, eadith)\nImprison(leora, janella)\nSpill(eadith, janella)\nCationic(eadith)\nKnotted(eadith)\nImprison(eadith, janella)\nImprison(eadith, leora)\nInquire(eadith, janella)\nInquire(eadith, leora)\nforall x (Cationic(x) and Imprison(x, leora) -> Tonic(leora))\nforall x (Spill(x, janella) -> Convenient(janella))\nforall x (Spill(x, eadith) and Knotted(x) -> Spill(x, janella))\nforall x (Spill(x, janella) and Imprison(x, leora) -> Inquire(leora, eadith))\nforall x (Inquire(x, leora) and Inquire(leora, eadith) -> Knotted(x))\nforall x (Cationic(x) -> Inquire(x, eadith))\nforall x (Spill(x, janella) and Imprison(janella, eadith) -> Inquire(x, janella))\nInquire(janella, leora) and Tonic(leora) -> Convenient(leora)\n\nnot Inquire(leora, eadith)\n\nSpill(eadith, janella) and Imprison(eadith, leora) and forall x (Spill(x, janella) and Imprison(x, leora) -> Inquire(leora, eadith)) -> therefore Inquire(leora, eadith)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The katheleen palatalise the lewis. The katheleen palatalise the reginauld. The katheleen is lipophilic. The katheleen interlope the reginauld. The katheleen smelt the lewis. The katheleen smelt the reginauld. The lewis palatalise the katheleen. The lewis palatalise the reginauld. The lewis interlope the katheleen. The reginauld palatalise the katheleen. The reginauld is lowborn. The reginauld is guiltless. The reginauld interlope the katheleen. The reginauld interlope the lewis. The reginauld smelt the katheleen. The reginauld smelt the lewis. If something is lowborn and it interlope the lewis then the lewis is solvable. If something palatalise the katheleen then the katheleen is lipophilic. If something palatalise the reginauld and it is guiltless then it palatalise the katheleen. If something palatalise the katheleen and it interlope the lewis then the lewis smelt the reginauld. If something smelt the lewis and the lewis smelt the reginauld then it is guiltless. If something is lowborn then it smelt the reginauld. If something palatalise the katheleen and the katheleen interlope the reginauld then it smelt the katheleen. If the katheleen smelt the lewis and the lewis is solvable then the lewis is lipophilic. The lewis is lipophilic.", "logic": "\nPalatalise(katheleen, lewis)\nPalatalise(katheleen, reginauld)\nLipophilic(katheleen)\nInterlope(katheleen, reginauld)\nSmelt(katheleen, lewis)\nSmelt(katheleen, reginauld)\nPalatalise(lewis, katheleen)\nPalatalise(lewis, reginauld)\nInterlope(lewis, katheleen)\nPalatalise(reginauld, katheleen)\nLowborn(reginauld)\nGuiltless(reginauld)\nInterlope(reginauld, katheleen)\nInterlope(reginauld, lewis)\nSmelt(reginauld, katheleen)\nSmelt(reginauld, lewis)\nforall x (Lowborn(x) and Interlope(x, lewis) -> Solvable(lewis))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, katheleen) -> Lipophilic(katheleen))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, reginauld) and Guiltless(x) -> Palatalise(x, katheleen))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, katheleen) and Interlope(x, lewis) -> Smelt(lewis, reginauld))\nforall x (Smelt(x, lewis) and Smelt(lewis, reginauld) -> Guiltless(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Smelt(x, reginauld))\nforall x (Palatalise(x, katheleen) and Interlope(katheleen, reginauld) -> Smelt(x, katheleen))\nSmelt(katheleen, lewis) and Solvable(lewis) -> Lipophilic(lewis)\n\nLipophilic(lewis)\n\nLowborn(reginauld) and Interlope(reginauld, lewis) and forall x (Lowborn(x) and Interlope(x, lewis) -> Solvable(lewis)) -> therefore Solvable(lewis) Smelt(katheleen, lewis) and Solvable(lewis) and Smelt(katheleen, lewis) and Solvable(lewis) -> Lipophilic(lewis) -> therefore Lipophilic(lewis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The tilly poniard the sergio. The tilly poniard the dom. The tilly is circadian. The tilly fillet the dom. The tilly rearrange the sergio. The tilly rearrange the dom. The sergio poniard the tilly. The sergio poniard the dom. The sergio fillet the tilly. The dom poniard the tilly. The dom is immobile. The dom is unreached. The dom fillet the tilly. The dom fillet the sergio. The dom rearrange the tilly. The dom rearrange the sergio. If something is immobile and it fillet the sergio then the sergio is carnal. If something poniard the tilly then the tilly is circadian. If something poniard the dom and it is unreached then it poniard the tilly. If something poniard the tilly and it fillet the sergio then the sergio rearrange the dom. If something rearrange the sergio and the sergio rearrange the dom then it is unreached. If something is immobile then it rearrange the dom. If something poniard the tilly and the tilly fillet the dom then it rearrange the tilly. If the tilly rearrange the sergio and the sergio is carnal then the sergio is circadian. The sergio is not circadian.", "logic": "\nPoniard(tilly, sergio)\nPoniard(tilly, dom)\nCircadian(tilly)\nFillet(tilly, dom)\nRearrange(tilly, sergio)\nRearrange(tilly, dom)\nPoniard(sergio, tilly)\nPoniard(sergio, dom)\nFillet(sergio, tilly)\nPoniard(dom, tilly)\nImmobile(dom)\nUnreached(dom)\nFillet(dom, tilly)\nFillet(dom, sergio)\nRearrange(dom, tilly)\nRearrange(dom, sergio)\nforall x (Immobile(x) and Fillet(x, sergio) -> Carnal(sergio))\nforall x (Poniard(x, tilly) -> Circadian(tilly))\nforall x (Poniard(x, dom) and Unreached(x) -> Poniard(x, tilly))\nforall x (Poniard(x, tilly) and Fillet(x, sergio) -> Rearrange(sergio, dom))\nforall x (Rearrange(x, sergio) and Rearrange(sergio, dom) -> Unreached(x))\nforall x (Immobile(x) -> Rearrange(x, dom))\nforall x (Poniard(x, tilly) and Fillet(tilly, dom) -> Rearrange(x, tilly))\nRearrange(tilly, sergio) and Carnal(sergio) -> Circadian(sergio)\n\nnot Circadian(sergio)\n\nImmobile(dom) and Fillet(dom, sergio) and forall x (Immobile(x) and Fillet(x, sergio) -> Carnal(sergio)) -> therefore Carnal(sergio) Rearrange(tilly, sergio) and Carnal(sergio) and Rearrange(tilly, sergio) and Carnal(sergio) -> Circadian(sergio) -> therefore Circadian(sergio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The winnah manage the steffi. The winnah manage the retha. The winnah is trichrome. The winnah legitimize the retha. The winnah fort the steffi. The winnah fort the retha. The steffi manage the winnah. The steffi manage the retha. The steffi legitimize the winnah. The retha manage the winnah. The retha is antipodean. The retha is perfect. The retha legitimize the winnah. The retha legitimize the steffi. The retha fort the winnah. The retha fort the steffi. If something is antipodean and it legitimize the steffi then the steffi is cultivable. If something manage the winnah then the winnah is trichrome. If something manage the retha and it is perfect then it manage the winnah. If something manage the winnah and it legitimize the steffi then the steffi fort the retha. If something fort the steffi and the steffi fort the retha then it is perfect. If something is antipodean then it fort the retha. If something manage the winnah and the winnah legitimize the retha then it fort the winnah. If the winnah fort the steffi and the steffi is cultivable then the steffi is trichrome. The winnah manage the winnah.", "logic": "\nManage(winnah, steffi)\nManage(winnah, retha)\nTrichrome(winnah)\nLegitimize(winnah, retha)\nFort(winnah, steffi)\nFort(winnah, retha)\nManage(steffi, winnah)\nManage(steffi, retha)\nLegitimize(steffi, winnah)\nManage(retha, winnah)\nAntipodean(retha)\nPerfect(retha)\nLegitimize(retha, winnah)\nLegitimize(retha, steffi)\nFort(retha, winnah)\nFort(retha, steffi)\nforall x (Antipodean(x) and Legitimize(x, steffi) -> Cultivable(steffi))\nforall x (Manage(x, winnah) -> Trichrome(winnah))\nforall x (Manage(x, retha) and Perfect(x) -> Manage(x, winnah))\nforall x (Manage(x, winnah) and Legitimize(x, steffi) -> Fort(steffi, retha))\nforall x (Fort(x, steffi) and Fort(steffi, retha) -> Perfect(x))\nforall x (Antipodean(x) -> Fort(x, retha))\nforall x (Manage(x, winnah) and Legitimize(winnah, retha) -> Fort(x, winnah))\nFort(winnah, steffi) and Cultivable(steffi) -> Trichrome(steffi)\n\nManage(winnah, winnah)\n\nManage(retha, winnah) and Legitimize(retha, steffi) and forall x (Manage(x, winnah) and Legitimize(x, steffi) -> Fort(steffi, retha)) -> therefore Fort(steffi, retha) Fort(winnah, steffi) and Fort(steffi, retha) and forall x (Fort(x, steffi) and Fort(steffi, retha) -> Perfect(x)) -> therefore Perfect(winnah) Manage(winnah, retha) and Perfect(winnah) and forall x (Manage(x, retha) and Perfect(x) -> Manage(x, winnah)) -> therefore Manage(winnah, winnah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The gabriella bristle the emalia. The gabriella bristle the terrye. The gabriella is dissimilar. The gabriella haggle the terrye. The gabriella numerate the emalia. The gabriella numerate the terrye. The emalia bristle the gabriella. The emalia bristle the terrye. The emalia haggle the gabriella. The terrye bristle the gabriella. The terrye is atilt. The terrye is pancreatic. The terrye haggle the gabriella. The terrye haggle the emalia. The terrye numerate the gabriella. The terrye numerate the emalia. If something is atilt and it haggle the emalia then the emalia is nonstick. If something bristle the gabriella then the gabriella is dissimilar. If something bristle the terrye and it is pancreatic then it bristle the gabriella. If something bristle the gabriella and it haggle the emalia then the emalia numerate the terrye. If something numerate the emalia and the emalia numerate the terrye then it is pancreatic. If something is atilt then it numerate the terrye. If something bristle the gabriella and the gabriella haggle the terrye then it numerate the gabriella. If the gabriella numerate the emalia and the emalia is nonstick then the emalia is dissimilar. The gabriella does not chase the gabriella.", "logic": "\nBristle(gabriella, emalia)\nBristle(gabriella, terrye)\nDissimilar(gabriella)\nHaggle(gabriella, terrye)\nNumerate(gabriella, emalia)\nNumerate(gabriella, terrye)\nBristle(emalia, gabriella)\nBristle(emalia, terrye)\nHaggle(emalia, gabriella)\nBristle(terrye, gabriella)\nAtilt(terrye)\nPancreatic(terrye)\nHaggle(terrye, gabriella)\nHaggle(terrye, emalia)\nNumerate(terrye, gabriella)\nNumerate(terrye, emalia)\nforall x (Atilt(x) and Haggle(x, emalia) -> Nonstick(emalia))\nforall x (Bristle(x, gabriella) -> Dissimilar(gabriella))\nforall x (Bristle(x, terrye) and Pancreatic(x) -> Bristle(x, gabriella))\nforall x (Bristle(x, gabriella) and Haggle(x, emalia) -> Numerate(emalia, terrye))\nforall x (Numerate(x, emalia) and Numerate(emalia, terrye) -> Pancreatic(x))\nforall x (Atilt(x) -> Numerate(x, terrye))\nforall x (Bristle(x, gabriella) and Haggle(gabriella, terrye) -> Numerate(x, gabriella))\nNumerate(gabriella, emalia) and Nonstick(emalia) -> Dissimilar(emalia)\n\nnot Bristle(gabriella, gabriella)\n\nBristle(terrye, gabriella) and Haggle(terrye, emalia) and forall x (Bristle(x, gabriella) and Haggle(x, emalia) -> Numerate(emalia, terrye)) -> therefore Numerate(emalia, terrye) Numerate(gabriella, emalia) and Numerate(emalia, terrye) and forall x (Numerate(x, emalia) and Numerate(emalia, terrye) -> Pancreatic(x)) -> therefore Pancreatic(gabriella) Bristle(gabriella, terrye) and Pancreatic(gabriella) and forall x (Bristle(x, terrye) and Pancreatic(x) -> Bristle(x, gabriella)) -> therefore Bristle(gabriella, gabriella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The cherilynn stylise the tod. The cherilynn stylise the marcus. The cherilynn is rimy. The cherilynn fish the marcus. The cherilynn strut the tod. The cherilynn strut the marcus. The tod stylise the cherilynn. The tod stylise the marcus. The tod fish the cherilynn. The marcus stylise the cherilynn. The marcus is artificial. The marcus is sanitary. The marcus fish the cherilynn. The marcus fish the tod. The marcus strut the cherilynn. The marcus strut the tod. If something is artificial and it fish the tod then the tod is effete. If something stylise the cherilynn then the cherilynn is rimy. If something stylise the marcus and it is sanitary then it stylise the cherilynn. If something stylise the cherilynn and it fish the tod then the tod strut the marcus. If something strut the tod and the tod strut the marcus then it is sanitary. If something is artificial then it strut the marcus. If something stylise the cherilynn and the cherilynn fish the marcus then it strut the cherilynn. If the cherilynn strut the tod and the tod is effete then the tod is rimy. The tod is not sanitary.", "logic": "\nStylise(cherilynn, tod)\nStylise(cherilynn, marcus)\nRimy(cherilynn)\nFish(cherilynn, marcus)\nStrut(cherilynn, tod)\nStrut(cherilynn, marcus)\nStylise(tod, cherilynn)\nStylise(tod, marcus)\nFish(tod, cherilynn)\nStylise(marcus, cherilynn)\nArtificial(marcus)\nSanitary(marcus)\nFish(marcus, cherilynn)\nFish(marcus, tod)\nStrut(marcus, cherilynn)\nStrut(marcus, tod)\nforall x (Artificial(x) and Fish(x, tod) -> Effete(tod))\nforall x (Stylise(x, cherilynn) -> Rimy(cherilynn))\nforall x (Stylise(x, marcus) and Sanitary(x) -> Stylise(x, cherilynn))\nforall x (Stylise(x, cherilynn) and Fish(x, tod) -> Strut(tod, marcus))\nforall x (Strut(x, tod) and Strut(tod, marcus) -> Sanitary(x))\nforall x (Artificial(x) -> Strut(x, marcus))\nforall x (Stylise(x, cherilynn) and Fish(cherilynn, marcus) -> Strut(x, cherilynn))\nStrut(cherilynn, tod) and Effete(tod) -> Rimy(tod)\n\nnot Sanitary(tod)\n\nforall x (Strut(x, tod) and Strut(tod, marcus) -> Sanitary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The osborn section the bailie. The osborn section the jean. The osborn is wooded. The osborn cart the jean. The osborn summer the bailie. The osborn summer the jean. The bailie section the osborn. The bailie section the jean. The bailie cart the osborn. The jean section the osborn. The jean is specified. The jean is removed. The jean cart the osborn. The jean cart the bailie. The jean summer the osborn. The jean summer the bailie. If something is specified and it cart the bailie then the bailie is uncheerful. If something section the osborn then the osborn is wooded. If something section the jean and it is removed then it section the osborn. If something section the osborn and it cart the bailie then the bailie summer the jean. If something summer the bailie and the bailie summer the jean then it is removed. If something is specified then it summer the jean. If something section the osborn and the osborn cart the jean then it summer the osborn. If the osborn summer the bailie and the bailie is uncheerful then the bailie is wooded. The jean cart the jean.", "logic": "\nSection(osborn, bailie)\nSection(osborn, jean)\nWooded(osborn)\nCart(osborn, jean)\nSummer(osborn, bailie)\nSummer(osborn, jean)\nSection(bailie, osborn)\nSection(bailie, jean)\nCart(bailie, osborn)\nSection(jean, osborn)\nSpecified(jean)\nRemoved(jean)\nCart(jean, osborn)\nCart(jean, bailie)\nSummer(jean, osborn)\nSummer(jean, bailie)\nforall x (Specified(x) and Cart(x, bailie) -> Uncheerful(bailie))\nforall x (Section(x, osborn) -> Wooded(osborn))\nforall x (Section(x, jean) and Removed(x) -> Section(x, osborn))\nforall x (Section(x, osborn) and Cart(x, bailie) -> Summer(bailie, jean))\nforall x (Summer(x, bailie) and Summer(bailie, jean) -> Removed(x))\nforall x (Specified(x) -> Summer(x, jean))\nforall x (Section(x, osborn) and Cart(osborn, jean) -> Summer(x, osborn))\nSummer(osborn, bailie) and Uncheerful(bailie) -> Wooded(bailie)\n\nCart(jean, jean)\n\nCart(jean, jean) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The dorrie equal the wyatt. The dorrie equal the gaby. The dorrie is trustful. The dorrie cause the gaby. The dorrie reach the wyatt. The dorrie reach the gaby. The wyatt equal the dorrie. The wyatt equal the gaby. The wyatt cause the dorrie. The gaby equal the dorrie. The gaby is artless. The gaby is taped. The gaby cause the dorrie. The gaby cause the wyatt. The gaby reach the dorrie. The gaby reach the wyatt. If something is artless and it cause the wyatt then the wyatt is loath. If something equal the dorrie then the dorrie is trustful. If something equal the gaby and it is taped then it equal the dorrie. If something equal the dorrie and it cause the wyatt then the wyatt reach the gaby. If something reach the wyatt and the wyatt reach the gaby then it is taped. If something is artless then it reach the gaby. If something equal the dorrie and the dorrie cause the gaby then it reach the dorrie. If the dorrie reach the wyatt and the wyatt is loath then the wyatt is trustful. The wyatt does not need the wyatt.", "logic": "\nEqual(dorrie, wyatt)\nEqual(dorrie, gaby)\nTrustful(dorrie)\nCause(dorrie, gaby)\nReach(dorrie, wyatt)\nReach(dorrie, gaby)\nEqual(wyatt, dorrie)\nEqual(wyatt, gaby)\nCause(wyatt, dorrie)\nEqual(gaby, dorrie)\nArtless(gaby)\nTaped(gaby)\nCause(gaby, dorrie)\nCause(gaby, wyatt)\nReach(gaby, dorrie)\nReach(gaby, wyatt)\nforall x (Artless(x) and Cause(x, wyatt) -> Loath(wyatt))\nforall x (Equal(x, dorrie) -> Trustful(dorrie))\nforall x (Equal(x, gaby) and Taped(x) -> Equal(x, dorrie))\nforall x (Equal(x, dorrie) and Cause(x, wyatt) -> Reach(wyatt, gaby))\nforall x (Reach(x, wyatt) and Reach(wyatt, gaby) -> Taped(x))\nforall x (Artless(x) -> Reach(x, gaby))\nforall x (Equal(x, dorrie) and Cause(dorrie, gaby) -> Reach(x, dorrie))\nReach(dorrie, wyatt) and Loath(wyatt) -> Trustful(wyatt)\n\nnot Reach(wyatt, wyatt)\n\nnot Reach(wyatt, wyatt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The daisie slide the hebert. The daisie slide the sidnee. The daisie is honied. The daisie kidnap the sidnee. The daisie carve the hebert. The daisie carve the sidnee. The hebert slide the daisie. The hebert slide the sidnee. The hebert kidnap the daisie. The sidnee slide the daisie. The sidnee is timid. The sidnee is echoless. The sidnee kidnap the daisie. The sidnee kidnap the hebert. The sidnee carve the daisie. The sidnee carve the hebert. If something is timid and it kidnap the hebert then the hebert is musty. If something slide the daisie then the daisie is honied. If something slide the sidnee and it is echoless then it slide the daisie. If something slide the daisie and it kidnap the hebert then the hebert carve the sidnee. If something carve the hebert and the hebert carve the sidnee then it is echoless. If something is timid then it carve the sidnee. If something slide the daisie and the daisie kidnap the sidnee then it carve the daisie. If the daisie carve the hebert and the hebert is musty then the hebert is honied. The daisie kidnap the daisie.", "logic": "\nSlide(daisie, hebert)\nSlide(daisie, sidnee)\nHonied(daisie)\nKidnap(daisie, sidnee)\nCarve(daisie, hebert)\nCarve(daisie, sidnee)\nSlide(hebert, daisie)\nSlide(hebert, sidnee)\nKidnap(hebert, daisie)\nSlide(sidnee, daisie)\nTimid(sidnee)\nEcholess(sidnee)\nKidnap(sidnee, daisie)\nKidnap(sidnee, hebert)\nCarve(sidnee, daisie)\nCarve(sidnee, hebert)\nforall x (Timid(x) and Kidnap(x, hebert) -> Musty(hebert))\nforall x (Slide(x, daisie) -> Honied(daisie))\nforall x (Slide(x, sidnee) and Echoless(x) -> Slide(x, daisie))\nforall x (Slide(x, daisie) and Kidnap(x, hebert) -> Carve(hebert, sidnee))\nforall x (Carve(x, hebert) and Carve(hebert, sidnee) -> Echoless(x))\nforall x (Timid(x) -> Carve(x, sidnee))\nforall x (Slide(x, daisie) and Kidnap(daisie, sidnee) -> Carve(x, daisie))\nCarve(daisie, hebert) and Musty(hebert) -> Honied(hebert)\n\nKidnap(daisie, daisie)\n\nKidnap(daisie, daisie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The stevie long the maryjo. The stevie long the ruperta. The stevie is pauline. The stevie reduce the ruperta. The stevie profiteer the maryjo. The stevie profiteer the ruperta. The maryjo long the stevie. The maryjo long the ruperta. The maryjo reduce the stevie. The ruperta long the stevie. The ruperta is cairned. The ruperta is exploited. The ruperta reduce the stevie. The ruperta reduce the maryjo. The ruperta profiteer the stevie. The ruperta profiteer the maryjo. If something is cairned and it reduce the maryjo then the maryjo is geometric. If something long the stevie then the stevie is pauline. If something long the ruperta and it is exploited then it long the stevie. If something long the stevie and it reduce the maryjo then the maryjo profiteer the ruperta. If something profiteer the maryjo and the maryjo profiteer the ruperta then it is exploited. If something is cairned then it profiteer the ruperta. If something long the stevie and the stevie reduce the ruperta then it profiteer the stevie. If the stevie profiteer the maryjo and the maryjo is geometric then the maryjo is pauline. The ruperta does not chase the ruperta.", "logic": "\nLong(stevie, maryjo)\nLong(stevie, ruperta)\nPauline(stevie)\nReduce(stevie, ruperta)\nProfiteer(stevie, maryjo)\nProfiteer(stevie, ruperta)\nLong(maryjo, stevie)\nLong(maryjo, ruperta)\nReduce(maryjo, stevie)\nLong(ruperta, stevie)\nCairned(ruperta)\nExploited(ruperta)\nReduce(ruperta, stevie)\nReduce(ruperta, maryjo)\nProfiteer(ruperta, stevie)\nProfiteer(ruperta, maryjo)\nforall x (Cairned(x) and Reduce(x, maryjo) -> Geometric(maryjo))\nforall x (Long(x, stevie) -> Pauline(stevie))\nforall x (Long(x, ruperta) and Exploited(x) -> Long(x, stevie))\nforall x (Long(x, stevie) and Reduce(x, maryjo) -> Profiteer(maryjo, ruperta))\nforall x (Profiteer(x, maryjo) and Profiteer(maryjo, ruperta) -> Exploited(x))\nforall x (Cairned(x) -> Profiteer(x, ruperta))\nforall x (Long(x, stevie) and Reduce(stevie, ruperta) -> Profiteer(x, stevie))\nProfiteer(stevie, maryjo) and Geometric(maryjo) -> Pauline(maryjo)\n\nnot Long(ruperta, ruperta)\n\nnot Long(ruperta, ruperta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The rickie dissociate the chadwick. The rickie dissociate the berkeley. The rickie is pretty. The rickie frolic the berkeley. The rickie leer the chadwick. The rickie leer the berkeley. The chadwick dissociate the rickie. The chadwick dissociate the berkeley. The chadwick frolic the rickie. The berkeley dissociate the rickie. The berkeley is vitalizing. The berkeley is credal. The berkeley frolic the rickie. The berkeley frolic the chadwick. The berkeley leer the rickie. The berkeley leer the chadwick. If something is vitalizing and it frolic the chadwick then the chadwick is rescued. If something dissociate the rickie then the rickie is pretty. If something dissociate the berkeley and it is credal then it dissociate the rickie. If something dissociate the rickie and it frolic the chadwick then the chadwick leer the berkeley. If something leer the chadwick and the chadwick leer the berkeley then it is credal. If something is vitalizing then it leer the berkeley. If something dissociate the rickie and the rickie frolic the berkeley then it leer the rickie. If the rickie leer the chadwick and the chadwick is rescued then the chadwick is pretty. The chadwick is vitalizing.", "logic": "\nDissociate(rickie, chadwick)\nDissociate(rickie, berkeley)\nPretty(rickie)\nFrolic(rickie, berkeley)\nLeer(rickie, chadwick)\nLeer(rickie, berkeley)\nDissociate(chadwick, rickie)\nDissociate(chadwick, berkeley)\nFrolic(chadwick, rickie)\nDissociate(berkeley, rickie)\nVitalizing(berkeley)\nCredal(berkeley)\nFrolic(berkeley, rickie)\nFrolic(berkeley, chadwick)\nLeer(berkeley, rickie)\nLeer(berkeley, chadwick)\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) and Frolic(x, chadwick) -> Rescued(chadwick))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, rickie) -> Pretty(rickie))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, berkeley) and Credal(x) -> Dissociate(x, rickie))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, rickie) and Frolic(x, chadwick) -> Leer(chadwick, berkeley))\nforall x (Leer(x, chadwick) and Leer(chadwick, berkeley) -> Credal(x))\nforall x (Vitalizing(x) -> Leer(x, berkeley))\nforall x (Dissociate(x, rickie) and Frolic(rickie, berkeley) -> Leer(x, rickie))\nLeer(rickie, chadwick) and Rescued(chadwick) -> Pretty(chadwick)\n\nVitalizing(chadwick)\n\nVitalizing(chadwick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The brit impact the alleen. The brit impact the harrie. The brit is celluloid. The brit sentence the harrie. The brit quicken the alleen. The brit quicken the harrie. The alleen impact the brit. The alleen impact the harrie. The alleen sentence the brit. The harrie impact the brit. The harrie is daylong. The harrie is lento. The harrie sentence the brit. The harrie sentence the alleen. The harrie quicken the brit. The harrie quicken the alleen. If something is daylong and it sentence the alleen then the alleen is nonlexical. If something impact the brit then the brit is celluloid. If something impact the harrie and it is lento then it impact the brit. If something impact the brit and it sentence the alleen then the alleen quicken the harrie. If something quicken the alleen and the alleen quicken the harrie then it is lento. If something is daylong then it quicken the harrie. If something impact the brit and the brit sentence the harrie then it quicken the brit. If the brit quicken the alleen and the alleen is nonlexical then the alleen is celluloid. The alleen is not red.", "logic": "\nImpact(brit, alleen)\nImpact(brit, harrie)\nCelluloid(brit)\nSentence(brit, harrie)\nQuicken(brit, alleen)\nQuicken(brit, harrie)\nImpact(alleen, brit)\nImpact(alleen, harrie)\nSentence(alleen, brit)\nImpact(harrie, brit)\nDaylong(harrie)\nLento(harrie)\nSentence(harrie, brit)\nSentence(harrie, alleen)\nQuicken(harrie, brit)\nQuicken(harrie, alleen)\nforall x (Daylong(x) and Sentence(x, alleen) -> Nonlexical(alleen))\nforall x (Impact(x, brit) -> Celluloid(brit))\nforall x (Impact(x, harrie) and Lento(x) -> Impact(x, brit))\nforall x (Impact(x, brit) and Sentence(x, alleen) -> Quicken(alleen, harrie))\nforall x (Quicken(x, alleen) and Quicken(alleen, harrie) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Daylong(x) -> Quicken(x, harrie))\nforall x (Impact(x, brit) and Sentence(brit, harrie) -> Quicken(x, brit))\nQuicken(brit, alleen) and Nonlexical(alleen) -> Celluloid(alleen)\n\nnot Red(alleen)\n\nnot Red(alleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The hamlet empathize the stefanie. The hamlet empathize the sansone. The hamlet is acinous. The hamlet laze the sansone. The hamlet leap the stefanie. The hamlet leap the sansone. The stefanie empathize the hamlet. The stefanie empathize the sansone. The stefanie laze the hamlet. The sansone empathize the hamlet. The sansone is lowbrowed. The sansone is bush. The sansone laze the hamlet. The sansone laze the stefanie. The sansone leap the hamlet. The sansone leap the stefanie. If something is lowbrowed and it laze the stefanie then the stefanie is tatty. If something empathize the hamlet then the hamlet is acinous. If something empathize the sansone and it is bush then it empathize the hamlet. If something empathize the hamlet and it laze the stefanie then the stefanie leap the sansone. If something leap the stefanie and the stefanie leap the sansone then it is bush. If something is lowbrowed then it leap the sansone. If something empathize the hamlet and the hamlet laze the sansone then it leap the hamlet. If the hamlet leap the stefanie and the stefanie is tatty then the stefanie is acinous. The hamlet laze the stefanie.", "logic": "\nEmpathize(hamlet, stefanie)\nEmpathize(hamlet, sansone)\nAcinous(hamlet)\nLaze(hamlet, sansone)\nLeap(hamlet, stefanie)\nLeap(hamlet, sansone)\nEmpathize(stefanie, hamlet)\nEmpathize(stefanie, sansone)\nLaze(stefanie, hamlet)\nEmpathize(sansone, hamlet)\nLowbrowed(sansone)\nBush(sansone)\nLaze(sansone, hamlet)\nLaze(sansone, stefanie)\nLeap(sansone, hamlet)\nLeap(sansone, stefanie)\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) and Laze(x, stefanie) -> Tatty(stefanie))\nforall x (Empathize(x, hamlet) -> Acinous(hamlet))\nforall x (Empathize(x, sansone) and Bush(x) -> Empathize(x, hamlet))\nforall x (Empathize(x, hamlet) and Laze(x, stefanie) -> Leap(stefanie, sansone))\nforall x (Leap(x, stefanie) and Leap(stefanie, sansone) -> Bush(x))\nforall x (Lowbrowed(x) -> Leap(x, sansone))\nforall x (Empathize(x, hamlet) and Laze(hamlet, sansone) -> Leap(x, hamlet))\nLeap(hamlet, stefanie) and Tatty(stefanie) -> Acinous(stefanie)\n\nLaze(hamlet, stefanie)\n\nLaze(hamlet, stefanie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1602"} {"premises": "The ron is bigger. All bigger people are carroty. Big, unfirm people are nonaged. If someone is bigger and carroty then they are unfirm. The ron is bigger.", "logic": "\nBigger(ron)\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Carroty(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) and Unfirm(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) and Carroty(x) -> Unfirm(x))\n\nBigger(ron)\n\ntherefore Bigger(ron)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The miranda is upcoming. All upcoming people are implicated. Big, sedulous people are brainsick. If someone is upcoming and implicated then they are sedulous. The miranda is not upcoming.", "logic": "\nUpcoming(miranda)\nforall x (Upcoming(x) -> Implicated(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Sedulous(x) -> Brainsick(x))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Implicated(x) -> Sedulous(x))\n\nnot Upcoming(miranda)\n\ntherefore Upcoming(miranda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The janice is riming. All riming people are broadnosed. Big, patchy people are glace. If someone is riming and broadnosed then they are patchy. The janice is broadnosed.", "logic": "\nRiming(janice)\nforall x (Riming(x) -> Broadnosed(x))\nforall x (Riming(x) and Patchy(x) -> Glace(x))\nforall x (Riming(x) and Broadnosed(x) -> Patchy(x))\n\nBroadnosed(janice)\n\nRiming(janice) and forall x (Riming(x) -> Broadnosed(x)) -> therefore Broadnosed(janice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The izabel is authentic. All authentic people are anticlinal. Big, central people are waspish. If someone is authentic and anticlinal then they are central. The izabel is not anticlinal.", "logic": "\nAuthentic(izabel)\nforall x (Authentic(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Central(x) -> Waspish(x))\nforall x (Authentic(x) and Anticlinal(x) -> Central(x))\n\nnot Anticlinal(izabel)\n\nAuthentic(izabel) and forall x (Authentic(x) -> Anticlinal(x)) -> therefore Anticlinal(izabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The park is cantabile. All cantabile people are scabrous. Big, drawn people are unkindled. If someone is cantabile and scabrous then they are drawn. The park is drawn.", "logic": "\nCantabile(park)\nforall x (Cantabile(x) -> Scabrous(x))\nforall x (Cantabile(x) and Drawn(x) -> Unkindled(x))\nforall x (Cantabile(x) and Scabrous(x) -> Drawn(x))\n\nDrawn(park)\n\nCantabile(park) and forall x (Cantabile(x) -> Scabrous(x)) -> therefore Scabrous(park) Cantabile(park) and Scabrous(park) and forall x (Cantabile(x) and Scabrous(x) -> Drawn(x)) -> therefore Drawn(park)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The lorinda is formative. All formative people are unalloyed. Big, damnatory people are chivalric. If someone is formative and unalloyed then they are damnatory. The lorinda is not damnatory.", "logic": "\nFormative(lorinda)\nforall x (Formative(x) -> Unalloyed(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) and Damnatory(x) -> Chivalric(x))\nforall x (Formative(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> Damnatory(x))\n\nnot Damnatory(lorinda)\n\nFormative(lorinda) and forall x (Formative(x) -> Unalloyed(x)) -> therefore Unalloyed(lorinda) Formative(lorinda) and Unalloyed(lorinda) and forall x (Formative(x) and Unalloyed(x) -> Damnatory(x)) -> therefore Damnatory(lorinda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The tine is unknowing. All unknowing people are comic. Big, argive people are bragging. If someone is unknowing and comic then they are argive. The tine is bragging.", "logic": "\nUnknowing(tine)\nforall x (Unknowing(x) -> Comic(x))\nforall x (Unknowing(x) and Argive(x) -> Bragging(x))\nforall x (Unknowing(x) and Comic(x) -> Argive(x))\n\nBragging(tine)\n\nUnknowing(tine) and forall x (Unknowing(x) -> Comic(x)) -> therefore Comic(tine) Unknowing(tine) and Comic(tine) and forall x (Unknowing(x) and Comic(x) -> Argive(x)) -> therefore Argive(tine) Unknowing(tine) and Argive(tine) and forall x (Unknowing(x) and Argive(x) -> Bragging(x)) -> therefore Bragging(tine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The fernanda is cutaneous. All cutaneous people are ruffianly. Big, algometric people are antipodean. If someone is cutaneous and ruffianly then they are algometric. The fernanda is not antipodean.", "logic": "\nCutaneous(fernanda)\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Ruffianly(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) and Algometric(x) -> Antipodean(x))\nforall x (Cutaneous(x) and Ruffianly(x) -> Algometric(x))\n\nnot Antipodean(fernanda)\n\nCutaneous(fernanda) and forall x (Cutaneous(x) -> Ruffianly(x)) -> therefore Ruffianly(fernanda) Cutaneous(fernanda) and Ruffianly(fernanda) and forall x (Cutaneous(x) and Ruffianly(x) -> Algometric(x)) -> therefore Algometric(fernanda) Cutaneous(fernanda) and Algometric(fernanda) and forall x (Cutaneous(x) and Algometric(x) -> Antipodean(x)) -> therefore Antipodean(fernanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The karita is adored. All adored people are cyprinid. Big, confirming people are hermitic. If someone is adored and cyprinid then they are confirming. The karita does not like the karita.", "logic": "\nAdored(karita)\nforall x (Adored(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Confirming(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nforall x (Adored(x) and Cyprinid(x) -> Confirming(x))\n\nnot Likes(karita, karita)\n\nnot Likes(karita, karita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The kitti is soldierly. All soldierly people are racemose. Big, macho people are hydroponic. If someone is soldierly and racemose then they are macho. The kitti is cold.", "logic": "\nSoldierly(kitti)\nforall x (Soldierly(x) -> Racemose(x))\nforall x (Soldierly(x) and Macho(x) -> Hydroponic(x))\nforall x (Soldierly(x) and Racemose(x) -> Macho(x))\n\nCold(kitti)\n\nCold(kitti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The talyah is chelonian. All chelonian people are definitive. Big, jungly people are chthonic. If someone is chelonian and definitive then they are jungly. The talyah does not need the talyah.", "logic": "\nChelonian(talyah)\nforall x (Chelonian(x) -> Definitive(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) and Jungly(x) -> Chthonic(x))\nforall x (Chelonian(x) and Definitive(x) -> Jungly(x))\n\nnot Needs(talyah, talyah)\n\nnot Needs(talyah, talyah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The davoud is internal. All internal people are nipponese. Big, shoaly people are unfree. If someone is internal and nipponese then they are shoaly. The davoud sees the davoud.", "logic": "\nInternal(davoud)\nforall x (Internal(x) -> Nipponese(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) and Shoaly(x) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Internal(x) and Nipponese(x) -> Shoaly(x))\n\nSees(davoud, davoud)\n\nSees(davoud, davoud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-503"} {"premises": "The claribel purr the sydel. The sydel does not visit the claribel. If something purr the sydel then the sydel stalemate the claribel. If something stalemate the claribel then the claribel stalemate the sydel. If something stalemate the claribel then the claribel stalemate the sydel. If the sydel purr the claribel and the claribel does not visit the sydel then the claribel stalemate the sydel. If something is dolorous and it soup the claribel then it does not like the claribel. If something soup the sydel then it stalemate the claribel. If something is undomestic and it does not need the claribel then the claribel soup the sydel. If something stalemate the sydel then it is not undomestic. The sydel does not visit the claribel.", "logic": "\nPurr(claribel, sydel)\nnot Purr(sydel, claribel)\nforall x (Purr(x, sydel) -> Stalemate(sydel, claribel))\nforall x (Stalemate(x, claribel) -> Stalemate(claribel, sydel))\nforall x (Stalemate(x, claribel) -> Stalemate(claribel, sydel))\nPurr(sydel, claribel) and not Purr(claribel, sydel) -> Stalemate(claribel, sydel)\nforall x (Dolorous(x) and Soup(x, claribel) -> not Stalemate(x, claribel))\nforall x (Soup(x, sydel) -> Stalemate(x, claribel))\nforall x (Undomestic(x) and not Soup(x, claribel) -> Soup(claribel, sydel))\nforall x (Stalemate(x, sydel) -> not Undomestic(x))\n\nnot Purr(sydel, claribel)\n\ntherefore not Purr(sydel, claribel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The eugenia stink the damara. The damara does not visit the eugenia. If something stink the damara then the damara register the eugenia. If something register the eugenia then the eugenia register the damara. If something register the eugenia then the eugenia register the damara. If the damara stink the eugenia and the eugenia does not visit the damara then the eugenia register the damara. If something is olive and it flavour the eugenia then it does not like the eugenia. If something flavour the damara then it register the eugenia. If something is adaptative and it does not need the eugenia then the eugenia flavour the damara. If something register the damara then it is not adaptative. The eugenia does not visit the damara.", "logic": "\nStink(eugenia, damara)\nnot Stink(damara, eugenia)\nforall x (Stink(x, damara) -> Register(damara, eugenia))\nforall x (Register(x, eugenia) -> Register(eugenia, damara))\nforall x (Register(x, eugenia) -> Register(eugenia, damara))\nStink(damara, eugenia) and not Stink(eugenia, damara) -> Register(eugenia, damara)\nforall x (Olive(x) and Flavour(x, eugenia) -> not Register(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Flavour(x, damara) -> Register(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Adaptative(x) and not Flavour(x, eugenia) -> Flavour(eugenia, damara))\nforall x (Register(x, damara) -> not Adaptative(x))\n\nnot Stink(eugenia, damara)\n\ntherefore Stink(eugenia, damara)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The nestor scab the marcellus. The marcellus does not visit the nestor. If something scab the marcellus then the marcellus relieve the nestor. If something relieve the nestor then the nestor relieve the marcellus. If something relieve the nestor then the nestor relieve the marcellus. If the marcellus scab the nestor and the nestor does not visit the marcellus then the nestor relieve the marcellus. If something is roughshod and it telegraph the nestor then it does not like the nestor. If something telegraph the marcellus then it relieve the nestor. If something is modular and it does not need the nestor then the nestor telegraph the marcellus. If something relieve the marcellus then it is not modular. The marcellus relieve the nestor.", "logic": "\nScab(nestor, marcellus)\nnot Scab(marcellus, nestor)\nforall x (Scab(x, marcellus) -> Relieve(marcellus, nestor))\nforall x (Relieve(x, nestor) -> Relieve(nestor, marcellus))\nforall x (Relieve(x, nestor) -> Relieve(nestor, marcellus))\nScab(marcellus, nestor) and not Scab(nestor, marcellus) -> Relieve(nestor, marcellus)\nforall x (Roughshod(x) and Telegraph(x, nestor) -> not Relieve(x, nestor))\nforall x (Telegraph(x, marcellus) -> Relieve(x, nestor))\nforall x (Modular(x) and not Telegraph(x, nestor) -> Telegraph(nestor, marcellus))\nforall x (Relieve(x, marcellus) -> not Modular(x))\n\nRelieve(marcellus, nestor)\n\nScab(nestor, marcellus) and forall x (Scab(x, marcellus) -> Relieve(marcellus, nestor)) -> therefore Relieve(marcellus, nestor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The beckie dissonate the gert. The gert does not visit the beckie. If something dissonate the gert then the gert waddle the beckie. If something waddle the beckie then the beckie waddle the gert. If something waddle the beckie then the beckie waddle the gert. If the gert dissonate the beckie and the beckie does not visit the gert then the beckie waddle the gert. If something is plain and it state the beckie then it does not like the beckie. If something state the gert then it waddle the beckie. If something is filthy and it does not need the beckie then the beckie state the gert. If something waddle the gert then it is not filthy. The gert does not like the beckie.", "logic": "\nDissonate(beckie, gert)\nnot Dissonate(gert, beckie)\nforall x (Dissonate(x, gert) -> Waddle(gert, beckie))\nforall x (Waddle(x, beckie) -> Waddle(beckie, gert))\nforall x (Waddle(x, beckie) -> Waddle(beckie, gert))\nDissonate(gert, beckie) and not Dissonate(beckie, gert) -> Waddle(beckie, gert)\nforall x (Plain(x) and State(x, beckie) -> not Waddle(x, beckie))\nforall x (State(x, gert) -> Waddle(x, beckie))\nforall x (Filthy(x) and not State(x, beckie) -> State(beckie, gert))\nforall x (Waddle(x, gert) -> not Filthy(x))\n\nnot Waddle(gert, beckie)\n\nDissonate(beckie, gert) and forall x (Dissonate(x, gert) -> Waddle(gert, beckie)) -> therefore Waddle(gert, beckie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The brandise extrude the chance. The chance does not visit the brandise. If something extrude the chance then the chance coax the brandise. If something coax the brandise then the brandise coax the chance. If something coax the brandise then the brandise coax the chance. If the chance extrude the brandise and the brandise does not visit the chance then the brandise coax the chance. If something is dermal and it bald the brandise then it does not like the brandise. If something bald the chance then it coax the brandise. If something is xxiii and it does not need the brandise then the brandise bald the chance. If something coax the chance then it is not xxiii. The brandise coax the chance.", "logic": "\nExtrude(brandise, chance)\nnot Extrude(chance, brandise)\nforall x (Extrude(x, chance) -> Coax(chance, brandise))\nforall x (Coax(x, brandise) -> Coax(brandise, chance))\nforall x (Coax(x, brandise) -> Coax(brandise, chance))\nExtrude(chance, brandise) and not Extrude(brandise, chance) -> Coax(brandise, chance)\nforall x (Dermal(x) and Bald(x, brandise) -> not Coax(x, brandise))\nforall x (Bald(x, chance) -> Coax(x, brandise))\nforall x (Xxiii(x) and not Bald(x, brandise) -> Bald(brandise, chance))\nforall x (Coax(x, chance) -> not Xxiii(x))\n\nCoax(brandise, chance)\n\nExtrude(brandise, chance) and forall x (Extrude(x, chance) -> Coax(chance, brandise)) -> therefore Coax(chance, brandise) Coax(chance, brandise) and forall x (Coax(x, brandise) -> Coax(brandise, chance)) -> therefore Coax(brandise, chance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The shauna express the henrik. The henrik does not visit the shauna. If something express the henrik then the henrik ridge the shauna. If something ridge the shauna then the shauna ridge the henrik. If something ridge the shauna then the shauna ridge the henrik. If the henrik express the shauna and the shauna does not visit the henrik then the shauna ridge the henrik. If something is dyspneal and it dunk the shauna then it does not like the shauna. If something dunk the henrik then it ridge the shauna. If something is formic and it does not need the shauna then the shauna dunk the henrik. If something ridge the henrik then it is not formic. The shauna does not like the henrik.", "logic": "\nExpress(shauna, henrik)\nnot Express(henrik, shauna)\nforall x (Express(x, henrik) -> Ridge(henrik, shauna))\nforall x (Ridge(x, shauna) -> Ridge(shauna, henrik))\nforall x (Ridge(x, shauna) -> Ridge(shauna, henrik))\nExpress(henrik, shauna) and not Express(shauna, henrik) -> Ridge(shauna, henrik)\nforall x (Dyspneal(x) and Dunk(x, shauna) -> not Ridge(x, shauna))\nforall x (Dunk(x, henrik) -> Ridge(x, shauna))\nforall x (Formic(x) and not Dunk(x, shauna) -> Dunk(shauna, henrik))\nforall x (Ridge(x, henrik) -> not Formic(x))\n\nnot Ridge(shauna, henrik)\n\nExpress(shauna, henrik) and forall x (Express(x, henrik) -> Ridge(henrik, shauna)) -> therefore Ridge(henrik, shauna) Ridge(henrik, shauna) and forall x (Ridge(x, shauna) -> Ridge(shauna, henrik)) -> therefore Ridge(shauna, henrik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The keil consume the elaine. The elaine does not visit the keil. If something consume the elaine then the elaine edge the keil. If something edge the keil then the keil edge the elaine. If something edge the keil then the keil edge the elaine. If the elaine consume the keil and the keil does not visit the elaine then the keil edge the elaine. If something is collateral and it towel the keil then it does not like the keil. If something towel the elaine then it edge the keil. If something is lavish and it does not need the keil then the keil towel the elaine. If something edge the elaine then it is not lavish. The keil is not lavish.", "logic": "\nConsume(keil, elaine)\nnot Consume(elaine, keil)\nforall x (Consume(x, elaine) -> Edge(elaine, keil))\nforall x (Edge(x, keil) -> Edge(keil, elaine))\nforall x (Edge(x, keil) -> Edge(keil, elaine))\nConsume(elaine, keil) and not Consume(keil, elaine) -> Edge(keil, elaine)\nforall x (Collateral(x) and Towel(x, keil) -> not Edge(x, keil))\nforall x (Towel(x, elaine) -> Edge(x, keil))\nforall x (Lavish(x) and not Towel(x, keil) -> Towel(keil, elaine))\nforall x (Edge(x, elaine) -> not Lavish(x))\n\nnot Lavish(keil)\n\nConsume(keil, elaine) and forall x (Consume(x, elaine) -> Edge(elaine, keil)) -> therefore Edge(elaine, keil) Edge(elaine, keil) and forall x (Edge(x, keil) -> Edge(keil, elaine)) -> therefore Edge(keil, elaine) Edge(keil, elaine) and forall x (Edge(x, elaine) -> not Lavish(x)) -> therefore not Lavish(keil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The berri economize the hermon. The hermon does not visit the berri. If something economize the hermon then the hermon uncoil the berri. If something uncoil the berri then the berri uncoil the hermon. If something uncoil the berri then the berri uncoil the hermon. If the hermon economize the berri and the berri does not visit the hermon then the berri uncoil the hermon. If something is padded and it trellis the berri then it does not like the berri. If something trellis the hermon then it uncoil the berri. If something is nitric and it does not need the berri then the berri trellis the hermon. If something uncoil the hermon then it is not nitric. The berri is nitric.", "logic": "\nEconomize(berri, hermon)\nnot Economize(hermon, berri)\nforall x (Economize(x, hermon) -> Uncoil(hermon, berri))\nforall x (Uncoil(x, berri) -> Uncoil(berri, hermon))\nforall x (Uncoil(x, berri) -> Uncoil(berri, hermon))\nEconomize(hermon, berri) and not Economize(berri, hermon) -> Uncoil(berri, hermon)\nforall x (Padded(x) and Trellis(x, berri) -> not Uncoil(x, berri))\nforall x (Trellis(x, hermon) -> Uncoil(x, berri))\nforall x (Nitric(x) and not Trellis(x, berri) -> Trellis(berri, hermon))\nforall x (Uncoil(x, hermon) -> not Nitric(x))\n\nNitric(berri)\n\nEconomize(berri, hermon) and forall x (Economize(x, hermon) -> Uncoil(hermon, berri)) -> therefore Uncoil(hermon, berri) Uncoil(hermon, berri) and forall x (Uncoil(x, berri) -> Uncoil(berri, hermon)) -> therefore Uncoil(berri, hermon) Uncoil(berri, hermon) and forall x (Uncoil(x, hermon) -> not Nitric(x)) -> therefore not Nitric(berri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The joice culminate the delilah. The delilah does not visit the joice. If something culminate the delilah then the delilah conga the joice. If something conga the joice then the joice conga the delilah. If something conga the joice then the joice conga the delilah. If the delilah culminate the joice and the joice does not visit the delilah then the joice conga the delilah. If something is hominid and it process the joice then it does not like the joice. If something process the delilah then it conga the joice. If something is outlying and it does not need the joice then the joice process the delilah. If something conga the delilah then it is not outlying. The joice does not need the delilah.", "logic": "\nCulminate(joice, delilah)\nnot Culminate(delilah, joice)\nforall x (Culminate(x, delilah) -> Conga(delilah, joice))\nforall x (Conga(x, joice) -> Conga(joice, delilah))\nforall x (Conga(x, joice) -> Conga(joice, delilah))\nCulminate(delilah, joice) and not Culminate(joice, delilah) -> Conga(joice, delilah)\nforall x (Hominid(x) and Process(x, joice) -> not Conga(x, joice))\nforall x (Process(x, delilah) -> Conga(x, joice))\nforall x (Outlying(x) and not Process(x, joice) -> Process(joice, delilah))\nforall x (Conga(x, delilah) -> not Outlying(x))\n\nnot Process(joice, delilah)\n\nforall x (Outlying(x) and not Process(x, joice) -> Process(joice, delilah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The kattie zigzag the tore. The tore does not visit the kattie. If something zigzag the tore then the tore clot the kattie. If something clot the kattie then the kattie clot the tore. If something clot the kattie then the kattie clot the tore. If the tore zigzag the kattie and the kattie does not visit the tore then the kattie clot the tore. If something is adducting and it bootlick the kattie then it does not like the kattie. If something bootlick the tore then it clot the kattie. If something is tetanic and it does not need the kattie then the kattie bootlick the tore. If something clot the tore then it is not tetanic. The kattie clot the kattie.", "logic": "\nZigzag(kattie, tore)\nnot Zigzag(tore, kattie)\nforall x (Zigzag(x, tore) -> Clot(tore, kattie))\nforall x (Clot(x, kattie) -> Clot(kattie, tore))\nforall x (Clot(x, kattie) -> Clot(kattie, tore))\nZigzag(tore, kattie) and not Zigzag(kattie, tore) -> Clot(kattie, tore)\nforall x (Adducting(x) and Bootlick(x, kattie) -> not Clot(x, kattie))\nforall x (Bootlick(x, tore) -> Clot(x, kattie))\nforall x (Tetanic(x) and not Bootlick(x, kattie) -> Bootlick(kattie, tore))\nforall x (Clot(x, tore) -> not Tetanic(x))\n\nClot(kattie, kattie)\n\nforall x (Bootlick(x, tore) -> Clot(x, kattie)) <- forall x (Tetanic(x) and not Bootlick(x, kattie) -> Bootlick(kattie, tore)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The alyson clap the melvyn. The melvyn does not visit the alyson. If something clap the melvyn then the melvyn omen the alyson. If something omen the alyson then the alyson omen the melvyn. If something omen the alyson then the alyson omen the melvyn. If the melvyn clap the alyson and the alyson does not visit the melvyn then the alyson omen the melvyn. If something is variolic and it compile the alyson then it does not like the alyson. If something compile the melvyn then it omen the alyson. If something is burnished and it does not need the alyson then the alyson compile the melvyn. If something omen the melvyn then it is not burnished. The alyson is not nice.", "logic": "\nClap(alyson, melvyn)\nnot Clap(melvyn, alyson)\nforall x (Clap(x, melvyn) -> Omen(melvyn, alyson))\nforall x (Omen(x, alyson) -> Omen(alyson, melvyn))\nforall x (Omen(x, alyson) -> Omen(alyson, melvyn))\nClap(melvyn, alyson) and not Clap(alyson, melvyn) -> Omen(alyson, melvyn)\nforall x (Variolic(x) and Compile(x, alyson) -> not Omen(x, alyson))\nforall x (Compile(x, melvyn) -> Omen(x, alyson))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and not Compile(x, alyson) -> Compile(alyson, melvyn))\nforall x (Omen(x, melvyn) -> not Burnished(x))\n\nnot Nice(alyson)\n\nnot Nice(alyson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The tanya humify the lucius. The lucius does not visit the tanya. If something humify the lucius then the lucius suspend the tanya. If something suspend the tanya then the tanya suspend the lucius. If something suspend the tanya then the tanya suspend the lucius. If the lucius humify the tanya and the tanya does not visit the lucius then the tanya suspend the lucius. If something is forficate and it untwine the tanya then it does not like the tanya. If something untwine the lucius then it suspend the tanya. If something is piggish and it does not need the tanya then the tanya untwine the lucius. If something suspend the lucius then it is not piggish. The lucius suspend the lucius.", "logic": "\nHumify(tanya, lucius)\nnot Humify(lucius, tanya)\nforall x (Humify(x, lucius) -> Suspend(lucius, tanya))\nforall x (Suspend(x, tanya) -> Suspend(tanya, lucius))\nforall x (Suspend(x, tanya) -> Suspend(tanya, lucius))\nHumify(lucius, tanya) and not Humify(tanya, lucius) -> Suspend(tanya, lucius)\nforall x (Forficate(x) and Untwine(x, tanya) -> not Suspend(x, tanya))\nforall x (Untwine(x, lucius) -> Suspend(x, tanya))\nforall x (Piggish(x) and not Untwine(x, tanya) -> Untwine(tanya, lucius))\nforall x (Suspend(x, lucius) -> not Piggish(x))\n\nSuspend(lucius, lucius)\n\nSuspend(lucius, lucius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The deryl unstaple the tiena. The tiena does not visit the deryl. If something unstaple the tiena then the tiena yell the deryl. If something yell the deryl then the deryl yell the tiena. If something yell the deryl then the deryl yell the tiena. If the tiena unstaple the deryl and the deryl does not visit the tiena then the deryl yell the tiena. If something is unswayed and it crescendo the deryl then it does not like the deryl. If something crescendo the tiena then it yell the deryl. If something is medium and it does not need the deryl then the deryl crescendo the tiena. If something yell the tiena then it is not medium. The tiena is not unswayed.", "logic": "\nUnstaple(deryl, tiena)\nnot Unstaple(tiena, deryl)\nforall x (Unstaple(x, tiena) -> Yell(tiena, deryl))\nforall x (Yell(x, deryl) -> Yell(deryl, tiena))\nforall x (Yell(x, deryl) -> Yell(deryl, tiena))\nUnstaple(tiena, deryl) and not Unstaple(deryl, tiena) -> Yell(deryl, tiena)\nforall x (Unswayed(x) and Crescendo(x, deryl) -> not Yell(x, deryl))\nforall x (Crescendo(x, tiena) -> Yell(x, deryl))\nforall x (Medium(x) and not Crescendo(x, deryl) -> Crescendo(deryl, tiena))\nforall x (Yell(x, tiena) -> not Medium(x))\n\nnot Unswayed(tiena)\n\nnot Unswayed(tiena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The orville wedge the hezekiah. The hezekiah does not visit the orville. If something wedge the hezekiah then the hezekiah airt the orville. If something airt the orville then the orville airt the hezekiah. If something airt the orville then the orville airt the hezekiah. If the hezekiah wedge the orville and the orville does not visit the hezekiah then the orville airt the hezekiah. If something is rodlike and it outsmart the orville then it does not like the orville. If something outsmart the hezekiah then it airt the orville. If something is lowly and it does not need the orville then the orville outsmart the hezekiah. If something airt the hezekiah then it is not lowly. The orville wedge the orville.", "logic": "\nWedge(orville, hezekiah)\nnot Wedge(hezekiah, orville)\nforall x (Wedge(x, hezekiah) -> Airt(hezekiah, orville))\nforall x (Airt(x, orville) -> Airt(orville, hezekiah))\nforall x (Airt(x, orville) -> Airt(orville, hezekiah))\nWedge(hezekiah, orville) and not Wedge(orville, hezekiah) -> Airt(orville, hezekiah)\nforall x (Rodlike(x) and Outsmart(x, orville) -> not Airt(x, orville))\nforall x (Outsmart(x, hezekiah) -> Airt(x, orville))\nforall x (Lowly(x) and not Outsmart(x, orville) -> Outsmart(orville, hezekiah))\nforall x (Airt(x, hezekiah) -> not Lowly(x))\n\nWedge(orville, orville)\n\nWedge(orville, orville) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The ninnette moil the sullivan. The sullivan does not visit the ninnette. If something moil the sullivan then the sullivan moralize the ninnette. If something moralize the ninnette then the ninnette moralize the sullivan. If something moralize the ninnette then the ninnette moralize the sullivan. If the sullivan moil the ninnette and the ninnette does not visit the sullivan then the ninnette moralize the sullivan. If something is roofed and it underplay the ninnette then it does not like the ninnette. If something underplay the sullivan then it moralize the ninnette. If something is vulturous and it does not need the ninnette then the ninnette underplay the sullivan. If something moralize the sullivan then it is not vulturous. The sullivan does not need the sullivan.", "logic": "\nMoil(ninnette, sullivan)\nnot Moil(sullivan, ninnette)\nforall x (Moil(x, sullivan) -> Moralize(sullivan, ninnette))\nforall x (Moralize(x, ninnette) -> Moralize(ninnette, sullivan))\nforall x (Moralize(x, ninnette) -> Moralize(ninnette, sullivan))\nMoil(sullivan, ninnette) and not Moil(ninnette, sullivan) -> Moralize(ninnette, sullivan)\nforall x (Roofed(x) and Underplay(x, ninnette) -> not Moralize(x, ninnette))\nforall x (Underplay(x, sullivan) -> Moralize(x, ninnette))\nforall x (Vulturous(x) and not Underplay(x, ninnette) -> Underplay(ninnette, sullivan))\nforall x (Moralize(x, sullivan) -> not Vulturous(x))\n\nnot Underplay(sullivan, sullivan)\n\nnot Underplay(sullivan, sullivan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "The menard condemn the dea. The dea does not visit the menard. If something condemn the dea then the dea dicker the menard. If something dicker the menard then the menard dicker the dea. If something dicker the menard then the menard dicker the dea. If the dea condemn the menard and the menard does not visit the dea then the menard dicker the dea. If something is broadside and it commission the menard then it does not like the menard. If something commission the dea then it dicker the menard. If something is plaguy and it does not need the menard then the menard commission the dea. If something dicker the dea then it is not plaguy. The menard commission the menard.", "logic": "\nCondemn(menard, dea)\nnot Condemn(dea, menard)\nforall x (Condemn(x, dea) -> Dicker(dea, menard))\nforall x (Dicker(x, menard) -> Dicker(menard, dea))\nforall x (Dicker(x, menard) -> Dicker(menard, dea))\nCondemn(dea, menard) and not Condemn(menard, dea) -> Dicker(menard, dea)\nforall x (Broadside(x) and Commission(x, menard) -> not Dicker(x, menard))\nforall x (Commission(x, dea) -> Dicker(x, menard))\nforall x (Plaguy(x) and not Commission(x, menard) -> Commission(menard, dea))\nforall x (Dicker(x, dea) -> not Plaguy(x))\n\nCommission(menard, menard)\n\nCommission(menard, menard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-284"} {"premises": "Baily is monodical. Baily is afraid. Baily is traceable. Baily is inchoate. Lenora is afraid. Lenora is inchoate. Jon is afraid. If someone is areolate and afraid then they are inchoate. If someone is inchoate and unseemly then they are areolate. White, inchoate people are afraid. If someone is afraid then they are unseemly. If Jon is unseemly then Jon is inchoate. If someone is traceable and unseemly then they are hypaethral. If Jon is monodical then Jon is hypaethral. All unseemly, inchoate people are monodical. Lenora is afraid.", "logic": "\nMonodical(baily)\nAfraid(baily)\nTraceable(baily)\nInchoate(baily)\nAfraid(lenora)\nInchoate(lenora)\nAfraid(jon)\nforall x (Areolate(x) and Afraid(x) -> Inchoate(x))\nforall x (Inchoate(x) and Unseemly(x) -> Areolate(x))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) and Inchoate(x) -> Afraid(x))\nforall x (Afraid(x) -> Unseemly(x))\nUnseemly(jon) -> Inchoate(jon)\nforall x (Traceable(x) and Unseemly(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\nMonodical(jon) -> Hypaethral(jon)\nforall x (Unseemly(x) and Inchoate(x) -> Monodical(x))\n\nAfraid(lenora)\n\ntherefore Afraid(lenora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2049"} {"premises": "Dorita is sewed. Dorita is sinitic. Dorita is symphonic. Dorita is mothproof. Gifford is sinitic. Gifford is mothproof. Nicky is sinitic. If someone is continued and sinitic then they are mothproof. If someone is mothproof and despoiled then they are continued. White, mothproof people are sinitic. If someone is sinitic then they are despoiled. If Nicky is despoiled then Nicky is mothproof. If someone is symphonic and despoiled then they are negligent. If Nicky is sewed then Nicky is negligent. All despoiled, mothproof people are sewed. Dorita is not sinitic.", "logic": "\nSewed(dorita)\nSinitic(dorita)\nSymphonic(dorita)\nMothproof(dorita)\nSinitic(gifford)\nMothproof(gifford)\nSinitic(nicky)\nforall x (Continued(x) and Sinitic(x) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Mothproof(x) and Despoiled(x) -> Continued(x))\nforall x (Negligent(x) and Mothproof(x) -> Sinitic(x))\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Despoiled(x))\nDespoiled(nicky) -> Mothproof(nicky)\nforall x (Symphonic(x) and Despoiled(x) -> Negligent(x))\nSewed(nicky) -> Negligent(nicky)\nforall x (Despoiled(x) and Mothproof(x) -> Sewed(x))\n\nnot Sinitic(dorita)\n\ntherefore Sinitic(dorita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2049"} {"premises": "Courtenay is factitious. Courtenay is humic. Courtenay is nineteenth. Courtenay is adjacent. Emma is humic. Emma is adjacent. Allsun is humic. If someone is cosmetic and humic then they are adjacent. If someone is adjacent and airheaded then they are cosmetic. White, adjacent people are humic. If someone is humic then they are airheaded. If Allsun is airheaded then Allsun is adjacent. If someone is nineteenth and airheaded then they are ninetieth. If Allsun is factitious then Allsun is ninetieth. All airheaded, adjacent people are factitious. Emma is not ninetieth.", "logic": "\nFactitious(courtenay)\nHumic(courtenay)\nNineteenth(courtenay)\nAdjacent(courtenay)\nHumic(emma)\nAdjacent(emma)\nHumic(allsun)\nforall x (Cosmetic(x) and Humic(x) -> Adjacent(x))\nforall x (Adjacent(x) and Airheaded(x) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Ninetieth(x) and Adjacent(x) -> Humic(x))\nforall x (Humic(x) -> Airheaded(x))\nAirheaded(allsun) -> Adjacent(allsun)\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) and Airheaded(x) -> Ninetieth(x))\nFactitious(allsun) -> Ninetieth(allsun)\nforall x (Airheaded(x) and Adjacent(x) -> Factitious(x))\n\nnot Ninetieth(emma)\n\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) and Airheaded(x) -> Ninetieth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2049"} {"premises": "Heddie is uniformed. Heddie is qatari. Heddie is antique. Heddie is dioecious. Paul is qatari. Paul is dioecious. Pru is qatari. If someone is steroidal and qatari then they are dioecious. If someone is dioecious and operculate then they are steroidal. White, dioecious people are qatari. If someone is qatari then they are operculate. If Pru is operculate then Pru is dioecious. If someone is antique and operculate then they are atilt. If Pru is uniformed then Pru is atilt. All operculate, dioecious people are uniformed. Paul is antique.", "logic": "\nUniformed(heddie)\nQatari(heddie)\nAntique(heddie)\nDioecious(heddie)\nQatari(paul)\nDioecious(paul)\nQatari(pru)\nforall x (Steroidal(x) and Qatari(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Dioecious(x) and Operculate(x) -> Steroidal(x))\nforall x (Atilt(x) and Dioecious(x) -> Qatari(x))\nforall x (Qatari(x) -> Operculate(x))\nOperculate(pru) -> Dioecious(pru)\nforall x (Antique(x) and Operculate(x) -> Atilt(x))\nUniformed(pru) -> Atilt(pru)\nforall x (Operculate(x) and Dioecious(x) -> Uniformed(x))\n\nAntique(paul)\n\nAntique(paul) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2049"} {"premises": "Lian is ideal. Karmen is pitchy. Ronda is pleural. Saxon is ideal. All pitchy, pleural people are ceremonial. All pleural people are pitchy. All ideal people are pleural. Saxon is ideal.", "logic": "\nIdeal(lian)\nPitchy(karmen)\nPleural(ronda)\nIdeal(saxon)\nforall x (Pitchy(x) and Pleural(x) -> Ceremonial(x))\nforall x (Pleural(x) -> Pitchy(x))\nforall x (Ideal(x) -> Pleural(x))\n\nIdeal(saxon)\n\ntherefore Ideal(saxon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Barnebas is driven. Esmaria is lactic. Marjie is procurable. Rosella is driven. All lactic, procurable people are ablative. All procurable people are lactic. All driven people are procurable. Barnebas is not driven.", "logic": "\nDriven(barnebas)\nLactic(esmaria)\nProcurable(marjie)\nDriven(rosella)\nforall x (Lactic(x) and Procurable(x) -> Ablative(x))\nforall x (Procurable(x) -> Lactic(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) -> Procurable(x))\n\nnot Driven(barnebas)\n\ntherefore Driven(barnebas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Tori is assistive. Oprah is alphabetic. Josepha is mistakable. Phillis is assistive. All alphabetic, mistakable people are zoonotic. All mistakable people are alphabetic. All assistive people are mistakable. Josepha is alphabetic.", "logic": "\nAssistive(tori)\nAlphabetic(oprah)\nMistakable(josepha)\nAssistive(phillis)\nforall x (Alphabetic(x) and Mistakable(x) -> Zoonotic(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Assistive(x) -> Mistakable(x))\n\nAlphabetic(josepha)\n\nMistakable(josepha) and forall x (Mistakable(x) -> Alphabetic(x)) -> therefore Alphabetic(josepha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Zandra is usual. Flossie is ruddy. Isadora is ratable. Jerrome is usual. All ruddy, ratable people are micaceous. All ratable people are ruddy. All usual people are ratable. Isadora is not ruddy.", "logic": "\nUsual(zandra)\nRuddy(flossie)\nRatable(isadora)\nUsual(jerrome)\nforall x (Ruddy(x) and Ratable(x) -> Micaceous(x))\nforall x (Ratable(x) -> Ruddy(x))\nforall x (Usual(x) -> Ratable(x))\n\nnot Ruddy(isadora)\n\nRatable(isadora) and forall x (Ratable(x) -> Ruddy(x)) -> therefore Ruddy(isadora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Cariotta is voluntary. Irena is whatever. Linette is colonial. Kattie is voluntary. All whatever, colonial people are goethian. All colonial people are whatever. All voluntary people are colonial. Cariotta is whatever.", "logic": "\nVoluntary(cariotta)\nWhatever(irena)\nColonial(linette)\nVoluntary(kattie)\nforall x (Whatever(x) and Colonial(x) -> Goethian(x))\nforall x (Colonial(x) -> Whatever(x))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) -> Colonial(x))\n\nWhatever(cariotta)\n\nVoluntary(cariotta) and forall x (Voluntary(x) -> Colonial(x)) -> therefore Colonial(cariotta) Colonial(cariotta) and forall x (Colonial(x) -> Whatever(x)) -> therefore Whatever(cariotta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Arlinda is subsurface. Valdemar is soft. Modesta is synergetic. Louie is subsurface. All soft, synergetic people are operose. All synergetic people are soft. All subsurface people are synergetic. Louie is not soft.", "logic": "\nSubsurface(arlinda)\nSoft(valdemar)\nSynergetic(modesta)\nSubsurface(louie)\nforall x (Soft(x) and Synergetic(x) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Synergetic(x) -> Soft(x))\nforall x (Subsurface(x) -> Synergetic(x))\n\nnot Soft(louie)\n\nSubsurface(louie) and forall x (Subsurface(x) -> Synergetic(x)) -> therefore Synergetic(louie) Synergetic(louie) and forall x (Synergetic(x) -> Soft(x)) -> therefore Soft(louie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Bubba is gritty. Marys is diminished. Charo is climactic. Modesta is gritty. All diminished, climactic people are masted. All climactic people are diminished. All gritty people are climactic. Bubba is masted.", "logic": "\nGritty(bubba)\nDiminished(marys)\nClimactic(charo)\nGritty(modesta)\nforall x (Diminished(x) and Climactic(x) -> Masted(x))\nforall x (Climactic(x) -> Diminished(x))\nforall x (Gritty(x) -> Climactic(x))\n\nMasted(bubba)\n\nGritty(bubba) and forall x (Gritty(x) -> Climactic(x)) -> therefore Climactic(bubba) Climactic(bubba) and forall x (Climactic(x) -> Diminished(x)) -> therefore Diminished(bubba) Gritty(bubba) and forall x (Gritty(x) -> Climactic(x)) -> therefore Climactic(bubba) Diminished(bubba) and Climactic(bubba) and forall x (Diminished(x) and Climactic(x) -> Masted(x)) -> therefore Masted(bubba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Kermit is hypnogogic. Danice is apotropaic. Yoko is cancellate. Lynnet is hypnogogic. All apotropaic, cancellate people are parametric. All cancellate people are apotropaic. All hypnogogic people are cancellate. Kermit is not parametric.", "logic": "\nHypnogogic(kermit)\nApotropaic(danice)\nCancellate(yoko)\nHypnogogic(lynnet)\nforall x (Apotropaic(x) and Cancellate(x) -> Parametric(x))\nforall x (Cancellate(x) -> Apotropaic(x))\nforall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Cancellate(x))\n\nnot Parametric(kermit)\n\nHypnogogic(kermit) and forall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Cancellate(x)) -> therefore Cancellate(kermit) Cancellate(kermit) and forall x (Cancellate(x) -> Apotropaic(x)) -> therefore Apotropaic(kermit) Hypnogogic(kermit) and forall x (Hypnogogic(x) -> Cancellate(x)) -> therefore Cancellate(kermit) Apotropaic(kermit) and Cancellate(kermit) and forall x (Apotropaic(x) and Cancellate(x) -> Parametric(x)) -> therefore Parametric(kermit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Noreen is posterior. Randal is senatorial. Cesar is windswept. Binky is posterior. All senatorial, windswept people are solo. All windswept people are senatorial. All posterior people are windswept. Randal is not windswept.", "logic": "\nPosterior(noreen)\nSenatorial(randal)\nWindswept(cesar)\nPosterior(binky)\nforall x (Senatorial(x) and Windswept(x) -> Solo(x))\nforall x (Windswept(x) -> Senatorial(x))\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Windswept(x))\n\nnot Windswept(randal)\n\nforall x (Posterior(x) -> Windswept(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Kelci is glittering. Stan is unified. Riva is bruising. Korry is glittering. All unified, bruising people are hitlerian. All bruising people are unified. All glittering people are bruising. Stan is hitlerian.", "logic": "\nGlittering(kelci)\nUnified(stan)\nBruising(riva)\nGlittering(korry)\nforall x (Unified(x) and Bruising(x) -> Hitlerian(x))\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> Unified(x))\nforall x (Glittering(x) -> Bruising(x))\n\nHitlerian(stan)\n\nforall x (Unified(x) and Bruising(x) -> Hitlerian(x)) <- forall x (Glittering(x) -> Bruising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Kesley is commensal. Markos is masterless. Sheena is logy. Rowland is commensal. All masterless, logy people are cryogenic. All logy people are masterless. All commensal people are logy. Sheena is not rough.", "logic": "\nCommensal(kesley)\nMasterless(markos)\nLogy(sheena)\nCommensal(rowland)\nforall x (Masterless(x) and Logy(x) -> Cryogenic(x))\nforall x (Logy(x) -> Masterless(x))\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Logy(x))\n\nnot Rough(sheena)\n\nnot Rough(sheena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Tuckie is knowable. Caprice is jolting. Lenny is sicilian. Tynan is knowable. All jolting, sicilian people are ahorse. All sicilian people are jolting. All knowable people are sicilian. Lenny is big.", "logic": "\nKnowable(tuckie)\nJolting(caprice)\nSicilian(lenny)\nKnowable(tynan)\nforall x (Jolting(x) and Sicilian(x) -> Ahorse(x))\nforall x (Sicilian(x) -> Jolting(x))\nforall x (Knowable(x) -> Sicilian(x))\n\nBig(lenny)\n\nBig(lenny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Jewel is fossil. Jami is sleek. Lane is straggling. Nikos is fossil. All sleek, straggling people are endocrine. All straggling people are sleek. All fossil people are straggling. Nikos is not quiet.", "logic": "\nFossil(jewel)\nSleek(jami)\nStraggling(lane)\nFossil(nikos)\nforall x (Sleek(x) and Straggling(x) -> Endocrine(x))\nforall x (Straggling(x) -> Sleek(x))\nforall x (Fossil(x) -> Straggling(x))\n\nnot Quiet(nikos)\n\nnot Quiet(nikos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Regan is terefah. Benny is nauseated. Delinda is cupric. Alphonse is terefah. All nauseated, cupric people are tanzanian. All cupric people are nauseated. All terefah people are cupric. Alphonse is big.", "logic": "\nTerefah(regan)\nNauseated(benny)\nCupric(delinda)\nTerefah(alphonse)\nforall x (Nauseated(x) and Cupric(x) -> Tanzanian(x))\nforall x (Cupric(x) -> Nauseated(x))\nforall x (Terefah(x) -> Cupric(x))\n\nBig(alphonse)\n\nBig(alphonse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Alec is thrillful. Alameda is coolheaded. Gabrila is thwarting. Murphy is thrillful. All coolheaded, thwarting people are garbled. All thwarting people are coolheaded. All thrillful people are thwarting. Alameda is not rough.", "logic": "\nThrillful(alec)\nCoolheaded(alameda)\nThwarting(gabrila)\nThrillful(murphy)\nforall x (Coolheaded(x) and Thwarting(x) -> Garbled(x))\nforall x (Thwarting(x) -> Coolheaded(x))\nforall x (Thrillful(x) -> Thwarting(x))\n\nnot Rough(alameda)\n\nnot Rough(alameda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "Warden is rightish. Augustine is omniscient. Mozelle is hundred. Winfred is rightish. All omniscient, hundred people are rushed. All hundred people are omniscient. All rightish people are hundred. Winfred is rough.", "logic": "\nRightish(warden)\nOmniscient(augustine)\nHundred(mozelle)\nRightish(winfred)\nforall x (Omniscient(x) and Hundred(x) -> Rushed(x))\nforall x (Hundred(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Rightish(x) -> Hundred(x))\n\nRough(winfred)\n\nRough(winfred) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1004"} {"premises": "The leanor arrest the moreen. The leanor is protected. The leanor is suicidal. The leanor is prevenient. The leanor is diarrheic. The leanor teach the moreen. The leanor telex the moreen. The moreen arrest the leanor. The moreen is protected. The moreen is dyspneal. The moreen is suicidal. The moreen is prevenient. The moreen is diarrheic. The moreen teach the leanor. The moreen telex the leanor. If something telex the moreen then the moreen is diarrheic. If something is prevenient then it telex the leanor. If something is protected then it teach the leanor. If something is diarrheic then it teach the moreen. If something teach the moreen and the moreen is diarrheic then the moreen telex the leanor. If something is suicidal and it teach the leanor then it arrest the leanor. Young, dyspneal things are protected. If something arrest the leanor then it is dyspneal. The moreen arrest the leanor.", "logic": "\nArrest(leanor, moreen)\nProtected(leanor)\nSuicidal(leanor)\nPrevenient(leanor)\nDiarrheic(leanor)\nTeach(leanor, moreen)\nTelex(leanor, moreen)\nArrest(moreen, leanor)\nProtected(moreen)\nDyspneal(moreen)\nSuicidal(moreen)\nPrevenient(moreen)\nDiarrheic(moreen)\nTeach(moreen, leanor)\nTelex(moreen, leanor)\nforall x (Telex(x, moreen) -> Diarrheic(moreen))\nforall x (Prevenient(x) -> Telex(x, leanor))\nforall x (Protected(x) -> Teach(x, leanor))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) -> Teach(x, moreen))\nforall x (Teach(x, moreen) and Diarrheic(moreen) -> Telex(moreen, leanor))\nforall x (Suicidal(x) and Teach(x, leanor) -> Arrest(x, leanor))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Dyspneal(x) -> Protected(x))\nforall x (Arrest(x, leanor) -> Dyspneal(x))\n\nArrest(moreen, leanor)\n\ntherefore Arrest(moreen, leanor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The tabitha intimate the levy. The tabitha is opponent. The tabitha is lengthened. The tabitha is permutable. The tabitha is logistic. The tabitha gray the levy. The tabitha brook the levy. The levy intimate the tabitha. The levy is opponent. The levy is coseismic. The levy is lengthened. The levy is permutable. The levy is logistic. The levy gray the tabitha. The levy brook the tabitha. If something brook the levy then the levy is logistic. If something is permutable then it brook the tabitha. If something is opponent then it gray the tabitha. If something is logistic then it gray the levy. If something gray the levy and the levy is logistic then the levy brook the tabitha. If something is lengthened and it gray the tabitha then it intimate the tabitha. Young, coseismic things are opponent. If something intimate the tabitha then it is coseismic. The tabitha does not need the levy.", "logic": "\nIntimate(tabitha, levy)\nOpponent(tabitha)\nLengthened(tabitha)\nPermutable(tabitha)\nLogistic(tabitha)\nGray(tabitha, levy)\nBrook(tabitha, levy)\nIntimate(levy, tabitha)\nOpponent(levy)\nCoseismic(levy)\nLengthened(levy)\nPermutable(levy)\nLogistic(levy)\nGray(levy, tabitha)\nBrook(levy, tabitha)\nforall x (Brook(x, levy) -> Logistic(levy))\nforall x (Permutable(x) -> Brook(x, tabitha))\nforall x (Opponent(x) -> Gray(x, tabitha))\nforall x (Logistic(x) -> Gray(x, levy))\nforall x (Gray(x, levy) and Logistic(levy) -> Brook(levy, tabitha))\nforall x (Lengthened(x) and Gray(x, tabitha) -> Intimate(x, tabitha))\nforall x (Logistic(x) and Coseismic(x) -> Opponent(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x, tabitha) -> Coseismic(x))\n\nnot Gray(tabitha, levy)\n\ntherefore Gray(tabitha, levy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The reynard foxtrot the carlee. The reynard is fatherlike. The reynard is none. The reynard is notched. The reynard is assigned. The reynard hinge the carlee. The reynard unloosen the carlee. The carlee foxtrot the reynard. The carlee is fatherlike. The carlee is monogamous. The carlee is none. The carlee is notched. The carlee is assigned. The carlee hinge the reynard. The carlee unloosen the reynard. If something unloosen the carlee then the carlee is assigned. If something is notched then it unloosen the reynard. If something is fatherlike then it hinge the reynard. If something is assigned then it hinge the carlee. If something hinge the carlee and the carlee is assigned then the carlee unloosen the reynard. If something is none and it hinge the reynard then it foxtrot the reynard. Young, monogamous things are fatherlike. If something foxtrot the reynard then it is monogamous. The reynard hinge the reynard.", "logic": "\nFoxtrot(reynard, carlee)\nFatherlike(reynard)\nNone(reynard)\nNotched(reynard)\nAssigned(reynard)\nHinge(reynard, carlee)\nUnloosen(reynard, carlee)\nFoxtrot(carlee, reynard)\nFatherlike(carlee)\nMonogamous(carlee)\nNone(carlee)\nNotched(carlee)\nAssigned(carlee)\nHinge(carlee, reynard)\nUnloosen(carlee, reynard)\nforall x (Unloosen(x, carlee) -> Assigned(carlee))\nforall x (Notched(x) -> Unloosen(x, reynard))\nforall x (Fatherlike(x) -> Hinge(x, reynard))\nforall x (Assigned(x) -> Hinge(x, carlee))\nforall x (Hinge(x, carlee) and Assigned(carlee) -> Unloosen(carlee, reynard))\nforall x (None(x) and Hinge(x, reynard) -> Foxtrot(x, reynard))\nforall x (Assigned(x) and Monogamous(x) -> Fatherlike(x))\nforall x (Foxtrot(x, reynard) -> Monogamous(x))\n\nHinge(reynard, reynard)\n\nFatherlike(reynard) and forall x (Fatherlike(x) -> Hinge(x, reynard)) -> therefore Hinge(reynard, reynard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The barris anticipate the arlene. The barris is quarterly. The barris is alluring. The barris is harmonious. The barris is softening. The barris uniformize the arlene. The barris bethink the arlene. The arlene anticipate the barris. The arlene is quarterly. The arlene is etiologic. The arlene is alluring. The arlene is harmonious. The arlene is softening. The arlene uniformize the barris. The arlene bethink the barris. If something bethink the arlene then the arlene is softening. If something is harmonious then it bethink the barris. If something is quarterly then it uniformize the barris. If something is softening then it uniformize the arlene. If something uniformize the arlene and the arlene is softening then the arlene bethink the barris. If something is alluring and it uniformize the barris then it anticipate the barris. Young, etiologic things are quarterly. If something anticipate the barris then it is etiologic. The arlene does not need the arlene.", "logic": "\nAnticipate(barris, arlene)\nQuarterly(barris)\nAlluring(barris)\nHarmonious(barris)\nSoftening(barris)\nUniformize(barris, arlene)\nBethink(barris, arlene)\nAnticipate(arlene, barris)\nQuarterly(arlene)\nEtiologic(arlene)\nAlluring(arlene)\nHarmonious(arlene)\nSoftening(arlene)\nUniformize(arlene, barris)\nBethink(arlene, barris)\nforall x (Bethink(x, arlene) -> Softening(arlene))\nforall x (Harmonious(x) -> Bethink(x, barris))\nforall x (Quarterly(x) -> Uniformize(x, barris))\nforall x (Softening(x) -> Uniformize(x, arlene))\nforall x (Uniformize(x, arlene) and Softening(arlene) -> Bethink(arlene, barris))\nforall x (Alluring(x) and Uniformize(x, barris) -> Anticipate(x, barris))\nforall x (Softening(x) and Etiologic(x) -> Quarterly(x))\nforall x (Anticipate(x, barris) -> Etiologic(x))\n\nnot Uniformize(arlene, arlene)\n\nSoftening(arlene) and forall x (Softening(x) -> Uniformize(x, arlene)) -> therefore Uniformize(arlene, arlene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The marti mingle the corry. The marti is honourable. The marti is mongol. The marti is dietetical. The marti is ominous. The marti bucket the corry. The marti hire the corry. The corry mingle the marti. The corry is honourable. The corry is mozartean. The corry is mongol. The corry is dietetical. The corry is ominous. The corry bucket the marti. The corry hire the marti. If something hire the corry then the corry is ominous. If something is dietetical then it hire the marti. If something is honourable then it bucket the marti. If something is ominous then it bucket the corry. If something bucket the corry and the corry is ominous then the corry hire the marti. If something is mongol and it bucket the marti then it mingle the marti. Young, mozartean things are honourable. If something mingle the marti then it is mozartean. The marti mingle the marti.", "logic": "\nMingle(marti, corry)\nHonourable(marti)\nMongol(marti)\nDietetical(marti)\nOminous(marti)\nBucket(marti, corry)\nHire(marti, corry)\nMingle(corry, marti)\nHonourable(corry)\nMozartean(corry)\nMongol(corry)\nDietetical(corry)\nOminous(corry)\nBucket(corry, marti)\nHire(corry, marti)\nforall x (Hire(x, corry) -> Ominous(corry))\nforall x (Dietetical(x) -> Hire(x, marti))\nforall x (Honourable(x) -> Bucket(x, marti))\nforall x (Ominous(x) -> Bucket(x, corry))\nforall x (Bucket(x, corry) and Ominous(corry) -> Hire(corry, marti))\nforall x (Mongol(x) and Bucket(x, marti) -> Mingle(x, marti))\nforall x (Ominous(x) and Mozartean(x) -> Honourable(x))\nforall x (Mingle(x, marti) -> Mozartean(x))\n\nMingle(marti, marti)\n\nHonourable(marti) and forall x (Honourable(x) -> Bucket(x, marti)) -> therefore Bucket(marti, marti) Mongol(marti) and Bucket(marti, marti) and forall x (Mongol(x) and Bucket(x, marti) -> Mingle(x, marti)) -> therefore Mingle(marti, marti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The randie embalm the kelila. The randie is tenebrious. The randie is motivated. The randie is frozen. The randie is neonatal. The randie dogfight the kelila. The randie nictitate the kelila. The kelila embalm the randie. The kelila is tenebrious. The kelila is lactogenic. The kelila is motivated. The kelila is frozen. The kelila is neonatal. The kelila dogfight the randie. The kelila nictitate the randie. If something nictitate the kelila then the kelila is neonatal. If something is frozen then it nictitate the randie. If something is tenebrious then it dogfight the randie. If something is neonatal then it dogfight the kelila. If something dogfight the kelila and the kelila is neonatal then the kelila nictitate the randie. If something is motivated and it dogfight the randie then it embalm the randie. Young, lactogenic things are tenebrious. If something embalm the randie then it is lactogenic. The randie does not chase the randie.", "logic": "\nEmbalm(randie, kelila)\nTenebrious(randie)\nMotivated(randie)\nFrozen(randie)\nNeonatal(randie)\nDogfight(randie, kelila)\nNictitate(randie, kelila)\nEmbalm(kelila, randie)\nTenebrious(kelila)\nLactogenic(kelila)\nMotivated(kelila)\nFrozen(kelila)\nNeonatal(kelila)\nDogfight(kelila, randie)\nNictitate(kelila, randie)\nforall x (Nictitate(x, kelila) -> Neonatal(kelila))\nforall x (Frozen(x) -> Nictitate(x, randie))\nforall x (Tenebrious(x) -> Dogfight(x, randie))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) -> Dogfight(x, kelila))\nforall x (Dogfight(x, kelila) and Neonatal(kelila) -> Nictitate(kelila, randie))\nforall x (Motivated(x) and Dogfight(x, randie) -> Embalm(x, randie))\nforall x (Neonatal(x) and Lactogenic(x) -> Tenebrious(x))\nforall x (Embalm(x, randie) -> Lactogenic(x))\n\nnot Embalm(randie, randie)\n\nTenebrious(randie) and forall x (Tenebrious(x) -> Dogfight(x, randie)) -> therefore Dogfight(randie, randie) Motivated(randie) and Dogfight(randie, randie) and forall x (Motivated(x) and Dogfight(x, randie) -> Embalm(x, randie)) -> therefore Embalm(randie, randie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The stevana gather the ambrosio. The stevana is unhindered. The stevana is quenched. The stevana is unwell. The stevana is downstair. The stevana shoulder the ambrosio. The stevana balkanise the ambrosio. The ambrosio gather the stevana. The ambrosio is unhindered. The ambrosio is bitchy. The ambrosio is quenched. The ambrosio is unwell. The ambrosio is downstair. The ambrosio shoulder the stevana. The ambrosio balkanise the stevana. If something balkanise the ambrosio then the ambrosio is downstair. If something is unwell then it balkanise the stevana. If something is unhindered then it shoulder the stevana. If something is downstair then it shoulder the ambrosio. If something shoulder the ambrosio and the ambrosio is downstair then the ambrosio balkanise the stevana. If something is quenched and it shoulder the stevana then it gather the stevana. Young, bitchy things are unhindered. If something gather the stevana then it is bitchy. The stevana is bitchy.", "logic": "\nGather(stevana, ambrosio)\nUnhindered(stevana)\nQuenched(stevana)\nUnwell(stevana)\nDownstair(stevana)\nShoulder(stevana, ambrosio)\nBalkanise(stevana, ambrosio)\nGather(ambrosio, stevana)\nUnhindered(ambrosio)\nBitchy(ambrosio)\nQuenched(ambrosio)\nUnwell(ambrosio)\nDownstair(ambrosio)\nShoulder(ambrosio, stevana)\nBalkanise(ambrosio, stevana)\nforall x (Balkanise(x, ambrosio) -> Downstair(ambrosio))\nforall x (Unwell(x) -> Balkanise(x, stevana))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Shoulder(x, stevana))\nforall x (Downstair(x) -> Shoulder(x, ambrosio))\nforall x (Shoulder(x, ambrosio) and Downstair(ambrosio) -> Balkanise(ambrosio, stevana))\nforall x (Quenched(x) and Shoulder(x, stevana) -> Gather(x, stevana))\nforall x (Downstair(x) and Bitchy(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Gather(x, stevana) -> Bitchy(x))\n\nBitchy(stevana)\n\nUnhindered(stevana) and forall x (Unhindered(x) -> Shoulder(x, stevana)) -> therefore Shoulder(stevana, stevana) Quenched(stevana) and Shoulder(stevana, stevana) and forall x (Quenched(x) and Shoulder(x, stevana) -> Gather(x, stevana)) -> therefore Gather(stevana, stevana) Gather(stevana, stevana) and forall x (Gather(x, stevana) -> Bitchy(x)) -> therefore Bitchy(stevana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The maxie tenure the kaleena. The maxie is coequal. The maxie is unionised. The maxie is enamored. The maxie is estrogenic. The maxie resew the kaleena. The maxie stoop the kaleena. The kaleena tenure the maxie. The kaleena is coequal. The kaleena is infantile. The kaleena is unionised. The kaleena is enamored. The kaleena is estrogenic. The kaleena resew the maxie. The kaleena stoop the maxie. If something stoop the kaleena then the kaleena is estrogenic. If something is enamored then it stoop the maxie. If something is coequal then it resew the maxie. If something is estrogenic then it resew the kaleena. If something resew the kaleena and the kaleena is estrogenic then the kaleena stoop the maxie. If something is unionised and it resew the maxie then it tenure the maxie. Young, infantile things are coequal. If something tenure the maxie then it is infantile. The maxie is not infantile.", "logic": "\nTenure(maxie, kaleena)\nCoequal(maxie)\nUnionised(maxie)\nEnamored(maxie)\nEstrogenic(maxie)\nResew(maxie, kaleena)\nStoop(maxie, kaleena)\nTenure(kaleena, maxie)\nCoequal(kaleena)\nInfantile(kaleena)\nUnionised(kaleena)\nEnamored(kaleena)\nEstrogenic(kaleena)\nResew(kaleena, maxie)\nStoop(kaleena, maxie)\nforall x (Stoop(x, kaleena) -> Estrogenic(kaleena))\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> Stoop(x, maxie))\nforall x (Coequal(x) -> Resew(x, maxie))\nforall x (Estrogenic(x) -> Resew(x, kaleena))\nforall x (Resew(x, kaleena) and Estrogenic(kaleena) -> Stoop(kaleena, maxie))\nforall x (Unionised(x) and Resew(x, maxie) -> Tenure(x, maxie))\nforall x (Estrogenic(x) and Infantile(x) -> Coequal(x))\nforall x (Tenure(x, maxie) -> Infantile(x))\n\nnot Infantile(maxie)\n\nCoequal(maxie) and forall x (Coequal(x) -> Resew(x, maxie)) -> therefore Resew(maxie, maxie) Unionised(maxie) and Resew(maxie, maxie) and forall x (Unionised(x) and Resew(x, maxie) -> Tenure(x, maxie)) -> therefore Tenure(maxie, maxie) Tenure(maxie, maxie) and forall x (Tenure(x, maxie) -> Infantile(x)) -> therefore Infantile(maxie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The francene bicker the butch. The francene is crinoid. The francene is capped. The francene is arachnoid. The francene is dominant. The francene bewail the butch. The francene busy the butch. The butch bicker the francene. The butch is crinoid. The butch is attenuate. The butch is capped. The butch is arachnoid. The butch is dominant. The butch bewail the francene. The butch busy the francene. If something busy the butch then the butch is dominant. If something is arachnoid then it busy the francene. If something is crinoid then it bewail the francene. If something is dominant then it bewail the butch. If something bewail the butch and the butch is dominant then the butch busy the francene. If something is capped and it bewail the francene then it bicker the francene. Young, attenuate things are crinoid. If something bicker the francene then it is attenuate. The butch does not chase the butch.", "logic": "\nBicker(francene, butch)\nCrinoid(francene)\nCapped(francene)\nArachnoid(francene)\nDominant(francene)\nBewail(francene, butch)\nBusy(francene, butch)\nBicker(butch, francene)\nCrinoid(butch)\nAttenuate(butch)\nCapped(butch)\nArachnoid(butch)\nDominant(butch)\nBewail(butch, francene)\nBusy(butch, francene)\nforall x (Busy(x, butch) -> Dominant(butch))\nforall x (Arachnoid(x) -> Busy(x, francene))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) -> Bewail(x, francene))\nforall x (Dominant(x) -> Bewail(x, butch))\nforall x (Bewail(x, butch) and Dominant(butch) -> Busy(butch, francene))\nforall x (Capped(x) and Bewail(x, francene) -> Bicker(x, francene))\nforall x (Dominant(x) and Attenuate(x) -> Crinoid(x))\nforall x (Bicker(x, francene) -> Attenuate(x))\n\nnot Bicker(butch, butch)\n\nnot Bicker(butch, butch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The ebeneser outrun the brant. The ebeneser is unexploded. The ebeneser is successive. The ebeneser is acarpelous. The ebeneser is catamenial. The ebeneser negotiate the brant. The ebeneser understock the brant. The brant outrun the ebeneser. The brant is unexploded. The brant is inelastic. The brant is successive. The brant is acarpelous. The brant is catamenial. The brant negotiate the ebeneser. The brant understock the ebeneser. If something understock the brant then the brant is catamenial. If something is acarpelous then it understock the ebeneser. If something is unexploded then it negotiate the ebeneser. If something is catamenial then it negotiate the brant. If something negotiate the brant and the brant is catamenial then the brant understock the ebeneser. If something is successive and it negotiate the ebeneser then it outrun the ebeneser. Young, inelastic things are unexploded. If something outrun the ebeneser then it is inelastic. The brant understock the brant.", "logic": "\nOutrun(ebeneser, brant)\nUnexploded(ebeneser)\nSuccessive(ebeneser)\nAcarpelous(ebeneser)\nCatamenial(ebeneser)\nNegotiate(ebeneser, brant)\nUnderstock(ebeneser, brant)\nOutrun(brant, ebeneser)\nUnexploded(brant)\nInelastic(brant)\nSuccessive(brant)\nAcarpelous(brant)\nCatamenial(brant)\nNegotiate(brant, ebeneser)\nUnderstock(brant, ebeneser)\nforall x (Understock(x, brant) -> Catamenial(brant))\nforall x (Acarpelous(x) -> Understock(x, ebeneser))\nforall x (Unexploded(x) -> Negotiate(x, ebeneser))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) -> Negotiate(x, brant))\nforall x (Negotiate(x, brant) and Catamenial(brant) -> Understock(brant, ebeneser))\nforall x (Successive(x) and Negotiate(x, ebeneser) -> Outrun(x, ebeneser))\nforall x (Catamenial(x) and Inelastic(x) -> Unexploded(x))\nforall x (Outrun(x, ebeneser) -> Inelastic(x))\n\nUnderstock(brant, brant)\n\nUnderstock(brant, brant) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-752"} {"premises": "The faunie surfeit the allina. The faunie is bedless. The faunie is jointed. The faunie is not cautionary. The faunie is adductive. The faunie uniformize the allina. The faunie quarry the allina. The allina surfeit the faunie. The allina is not jointed. The allina is cautionary. The allina uniformize the faunie. The allina does not visit the faunie. If someone surfeit the faunie then the faunie uniformize the allina. If someone is bedless then they are forlorn. If someone surfeit the allina and they visit the faunie then they do not eat the faunie. If someone is bedless then they visit the allina. If someone surfeit the allina then they visit the faunie. If the faunie is jointed and the faunie does not see the allina then the allina is cautionary. If someone uniformize the allina and they do not eat the faunie then they do not see the faunie. If someone quarry the allina and the allina does not see the faunie then they are cautionary. The allina is cautionary.", "logic": "\nSurfeit(faunie, allina)\nBedless(faunie)\nJointed(faunie)\nnot Cautionary(faunie)\nAdductive(faunie)\nUniformize(faunie, allina)\nQuarry(faunie, allina)\nSurfeit(allina, faunie)\nnot Jointed(allina)\nCautionary(allina)\nUniformize(allina, faunie)\nnot Quarry(allina, faunie)\nforall x (Surfeit(x, faunie) -> Uniformize(faunie, allina))\nforall x (Bedless(x) -> Forlorn(x))\nforall x (Surfeit(x, allina) and Quarry(x, faunie) -> not Surfeit(x, faunie))\nforall x (Bedless(x) -> Quarry(x, allina))\nforall x (Surfeit(x, allina) -> Quarry(x, faunie))\nJointed(faunie) and not Uniformize(faunie, allina) -> Cautionary(allina)\nforall x (Uniformize(x, allina) and not Surfeit(x, faunie) -> not Uniformize(x, faunie))\nforall x (Quarry(x, allina) and not Uniformize(allina, faunie) -> Cautionary(x))\n\nCautionary(allina)\n\ntherefore Cautionary(allina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The charo tour the corabella. The charo is ossified. The charo is despoiled. The charo is not unmade. The charo is unstilted. The charo patter the corabella. The charo misquote the corabella. The corabella tour the charo. The corabella is not despoiled. The corabella is unmade. The corabella patter the charo. The corabella does not visit the charo. If someone tour the charo then the charo patter the corabella. If someone is ossified then they are austenitic. If someone tour the corabella and they visit the charo then they do not eat the charo. If someone is ossified then they visit the corabella. If someone tour the corabella then they visit the charo. If the charo is despoiled and the charo does not see the corabella then the corabella is unmade. If someone patter the corabella and they do not eat the charo then they do not see the charo. If someone misquote the corabella and the corabella does not see the charo then they are unmade. The charo does not visit the corabella.", "logic": "\nTour(charo, corabella)\nOssified(charo)\nDespoiled(charo)\nnot Unmade(charo)\nUnstilted(charo)\nPatter(charo, corabella)\nMisquote(charo, corabella)\nTour(corabella, charo)\nnot Despoiled(corabella)\nUnmade(corabella)\nPatter(corabella, charo)\nnot Misquote(corabella, charo)\nforall x (Tour(x, charo) -> Patter(charo, corabella))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Austenitic(x))\nforall x (Tour(x, corabella) and Misquote(x, charo) -> not Tour(x, charo))\nforall x (Ossified(x) -> Misquote(x, corabella))\nforall x (Tour(x, corabella) -> Misquote(x, charo))\nDespoiled(charo) and not Patter(charo, corabella) -> Unmade(corabella)\nforall x (Patter(x, corabella) and not Tour(x, charo) -> not Patter(x, charo))\nforall x (Misquote(x, corabella) and not Patter(corabella, charo) -> Unmade(x))\n\nnot Misquote(charo, corabella)\n\ntherefore Misquote(charo, corabella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The duncan deplete the gabe. The duncan is eternal. The duncan is unblessed. The duncan is not lamented. The duncan is awless. The duncan hire the gabe. The duncan skreak the gabe. The gabe deplete the duncan. The gabe is not unblessed. The gabe is lamented. The gabe hire the duncan. The gabe does not visit the duncan. If someone deplete the duncan then the duncan hire the gabe. If someone is eternal then they are fiendish. If someone deplete the gabe and they visit the duncan then they do not eat the duncan. If someone is eternal then they visit the gabe. If someone deplete the gabe then they visit the duncan. If the duncan is unblessed and the duncan does not see the gabe then the gabe is lamented. If someone hire the gabe and they do not eat the duncan then they do not see the duncan. If someone skreak the gabe and the gabe does not see the duncan then they are lamented. The duncan is fiendish.", "logic": "\nDeplete(duncan, gabe)\nEternal(duncan)\nUnblessed(duncan)\nnot Lamented(duncan)\nAwless(duncan)\nHire(duncan, gabe)\nSkreak(duncan, gabe)\nDeplete(gabe, duncan)\nnot Unblessed(gabe)\nLamented(gabe)\nHire(gabe, duncan)\nnot Skreak(gabe, duncan)\nforall x (Deplete(x, duncan) -> Hire(duncan, gabe))\nforall x (Eternal(x) -> Fiendish(x))\nforall x (Deplete(x, gabe) and Skreak(x, duncan) -> not Deplete(x, duncan))\nforall x (Eternal(x) -> Skreak(x, gabe))\nforall x (Deplete(x, gabe) -> Skreak(x, duncan))\nUnblessed(duncan) and not Hire(duncan, gabe) -> Lamented(gabe)\nforall x (Hire(x, gabe) and not Deplete(x, duncan) -> not Hire(x, duncan))\nforall x (Skreak(x, gabe) and not Hire(gabe, duncan) -> Lamented(x))\n\nFiendish(duncan)\n\nEternal(duncan) and forall x (Eternal(x) -> Fiendish(x)) -> therefore Fiendish(duncan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The cecil behoove the karrah. The cecil is uttermost. The cecil is viceregal. The cecil is not imbalanced. The cecil is seafaring. The cecil kibosh the karrah. The cecil gauffer the karrah. The karrah behoove the cecil. The karrah is not viceregal. The karrah is imbalanced. The karrah kibosh the cecil. The karrah does not visit the cecil. If someone behoove the cecil then the cecil kibosh the karrah. If someone is uttermost then they are unextended. If someone behoove the karrah and they visit the cecil then they do not eat the cecil. If someone is uttermost then they visit the karrah. If someone behoove the karrah then they visit the cecil. If the cecil is viceregal and the cecil does not see the karrah then the karrah is imbalanced. If someone kibosh the karrah and they do not eat the cecil then they do not see the cecil. If someone gauffer the karrah and the karrah does not see the cecil then they are imbalanced. The cecil is not unextended.", "logic": "\nBehoove(cecil, karrah)\nUttermost(cecil)\nViceregal(cecil)\nnot Imbalanced(cecil)\nSeafaring(cecil)\nKibosh(cecil, karrah)\nGauffer(cecil, karrah)\nBehoove(karrah, cecil)\nnot Viceregal(karrah)\nImbalanced(karrah)\nKibosh(karrah, cecil)\nnot Gauffer(karrah, cecil)\nforall x (Behoove(x, cecil) -> Kibosh(cecil, karrah))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Behoove(x, karrah) and Gauffer(x, cecil) -> not Behoove(x, cecil))\nforall x (Uttermost(x) -> Gauffer(x, karrah))\nforall x (Behoove(x, karrah) -> Gauffer(x, cecil))\nViceregal(cecil) and not Kibosh(cecil, karrah) -> Imbalanced(karrah)\nforall x (Kibosh(x, karrah) and not Behoove(x, cecil) -> not Kibosh(x, cecil))\nforall x (Gauffer(x, karrah) and not Kibosh(karrah, cecil) -> Imbalanced(x))\n\nnot Unextended(cecil)\n\nUttermost(cecil) and forall x (Uttermost(x) -> Unextended(x)) -> therefore Unextended(cecil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The sigfried pitchfork the minta. The sigfried is chylous. The sigfried is ransacked. The sigfried is not modeled. The sigfried is sliced. The sigfried adjust the minta. The sigfried subjugate the minta. The minta pitchfork the sigfried. The minta is not ransacked. The minta is modeled. The minta adjust the sigfried. The minta does not visit the sigfried. If someone pitchfork the sigfried then the sigfried adjust the minta. If someone is chylous then they are tiered. If someone pitchfork the minta and they visit the sigfried then they do not eat the sigfried. If someone is chylous then they visit the minta. If someone pitchfork the minta then they visit the sigfried. If the sigfried is ransacked and the sigfried does not see the minta then the minta is modeled. If someone adjust the minta and they do not eat the sigfried then they do not see the sigfried. If someone subjugate the minta and the minta does not see the sigfried then they are modeled. The sigfried does not eat the sigfried.", "logic": "\nPitchfork(sigfried, minta)\nChylous(sigfried)\nRansacked(sigfried)\nnot Modeled(sigfried)\nSliced(sigfried)\nAdjust(sigfried, minta)\nSubjugate(sigfried, minta)\nPitchfork(minta, sigfried)\nnot Ransacked(minta)\nModeled(minta)\nAdjust(minta, sigfried)\nnot Subjugate(minta, sigfried)\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, sigfried) -> Adjust(sigfried, minta))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Tiered(x))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, minta) and Subjugate(x, sigfried) -> not Pitchfork(x, sigfried))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Subjugate(x, minta))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, minta) -> Subjugate(x, sigfried))\nRansacked(sigfried) and not Adjust(sigfried, minta) -> Modeled(minta)\nforall x (Adjust(x, minta) and not Pitchfork(x, sigfried) -> not Adjust(x, sigfried))\nforall x (Subjugate(x, minta) and not Adjust(minta, sigfried) -> Modeled(x))\n\nnot Pitchfork(sigfried, sigfried)\n\nPitchfork(sigfried, minta) and forall x (Pitchfork(x, minta) -> Subjugate(x, sigfried)) -> therefore Subjugate(sigfried, sigfried) Pitchfork(sigfried, minta) and Subjugate(sigfried, sigfried) and forall x (Pitchfork(x, minta) and Subjugate(x, sigfried) -> not Pitchfork(x, sigfried)) -> therefore not Pitchfork(sigfried, sigfried)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The neilla devalue the sawyere. The neilla is aweigh. The neilla is splayfoot. The neilla is not northmost. The neilla is front. The neilla reforest the sawyere. The neilla walk the sawyere. The sawyere devalue the neilla. The sawyere is not splayfoot. The sawyere is northmost. The sawyere reforest the neilla. The sawyere does not visit the neilla. If someone devalue the neilla then the neilla reforest the sawyere. If someone is aweigh then they are decrepit. If someone devalue the sawyere and they visit the neilla then they do not eat the neilla. If someone is aweigh then they visit the sawyere. If someone devalue the sawyere then they visit the neilla. If the neilla is splayfoot and the neilla does not see the sawyere then the sawyere is northmost. If someone reforest the sawyere and they do not eat the neilla then they do not see the neilla. If someone walk the sawyere and the sawyere does not see the neilla then they are northmost. The neilla devalue the neilla.", "logic": "\nDevalue(neilla, sawyere)\nAweigh(neilla)\nSplayfoot(neilla)\nnot Northmost(neilla)\nFront(neilla)\nReforest(neilla, sawyere)\nWalk(neilla, sawyere)\nDevalue(sawyere, neilla)\nnot Splayfoot(sawyere)\nNorthmost(sawyere)\nReforest(sawyere, neilla)\nnot Walk(sawyere, neilla)\nforall x (Devalue(x, neilla) -> Reforest(neilla, sawyere))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Decrepit(x))\nforall x (Devalue(x, sawyere) and Walk(x, neilla) -> not Devalue(x, neilla))\nforall x (Aweigh(x) -> Walk(x, sawyere))\nforall x (Devalue(x, sawyere) -> Walk(x, neilla))\nSplayfoot(neilla) and not Reforest(neilla, sawyere) -> Northmost(sawyere)\nforall x (Reforest(x, sawyere) and not Devalue(x, neilla) -> not Reforest(x, neilla))\nforall x (Walk(x, sawyere) and not Reforest(sawyere, neilla) -> Northmost(x))\n\nDevalue(neilla, neilla)\n\nDevalue(neilla, sawyere) and forall x (Devalue(x, sawyere) -> Walk(x, neilla)) -> therefore Walk(neilla, neilla) Devalue(neilla, sawyere) and Walk(neilla, neilla) and forall x (Devalue(x, sawyere) and Walk(x, neilla) -> not Devalue(x, neilla)) -> therefore not Devalue(neilla, neilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The carola fear the wilmette. The carola is scaphoid. The carola is xlviii. The carola is not muffled. The carola is newtonian. The carola hush the wilmette. The carola liquidise the wilmette. The wilmette fear the carola. The wilmette is not xlviii. The wilmette is muffled. The wilmette hush the carola. The wilmette does not visit the carola. If someone fear the carola then the carola hush the wilmette. If someone is scaphoid then they are turbaned. If someone fear the wilmette and they visit the carola then they do not eat the carola. If someone is scaphoid then they visit the wilmette. If someone fear the wilmette then they visit the carola. If the carola is xlviii and the carola does not see the wilmette then the wilmette is muffled. If someone hush the wilmette and they do not eat the carola then they do not see the carola. If someone liquidise the wilmette and the wilmette does not see the carola then they are muffled. The carola does not see the carola.", "logic": "\nFear(carola, wilmette)\nScaphoid(carola)\nXlviii(carola)\nnot Muffled(carola)\nNewtonian(carola)\nHush(carola, wilmette)\nLiquidise(carola, wilmette)\nFear(wilmette, carola)\nnot Xlviii(wilmette)\nMuffled(wilmette)\nHush(wilmette, carola)\nnot Liquidise(wilmette, carola)\nforall x (Fear(x, carola) -> Hush(carola, wilmette))\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Turbaned(x))\nforall x (Fear(x, wilmette) and Liquidise(x, carola) -> not Fear(x, carola))\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Liquidise(x, wilmette))\nforall x (Fear(x, wilmette) -> Liquidise(x, carola))\nXlviii(carola) and not Hush(carola, wilmette) -> Muffled(wilmette)\nforall x (Hush(x, wilmette) and not Fear(x, carola) -> not Hush(x, carola))\nforall x (Liquidise(x, wilmette) and not Hush(wilmette, carola) -> Muffled(x))\n\nnot Hush(carola, carola)\n\nFear(carola, wilmette) and forall x (Fear(x, wilmette) -> Liquidise(x, carola)) -> therefore Liquidise(carola, carola) Fear(carola, wilmette) and Liquidise(carola, carola) and forall x (Fear(x, wilmette) and Liquidise(x, carola) -> not Fear(x, carola)) -> therefore not Fear(carola, carola) Hush(carola, wilmette) and not Fear(carola, carola) and forall x (Hush(x, wilmette) and not Fear(x, carola) -> not Hush(x, carola)) -> therefore not Hush(carola, carola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The travers please the chance. The travers is unfastened. The travers is fetal. The travers is not bold. The travers is ailing. The travers kotow the chance. The travers bombproof the chance. The chance please the travers. The chance is not fetal. The chance is bold. The chance kotow the travers. The chance does not visit the travers. If someone please the travers then the travers kotow the chance. If someone is unfastened then they are papal. If someone please the chance and they visit the travers then they do not eat the travers. If someone is unfastened then they visit the chance. If someone please the chance then they visit the travers. If the travers is fetal and the travers does not see the chance then the chance is bold. If someone kotow the chance and they do not eat the travers then they do not see the travers. If someone bombproof the chance and the chance does not see the travers then they are bold. The travers kotow the travers.", "logic": "\nPlease(travers, chance)\nUnfastened(travers)\nFetal(travers)\nnot Bold(travers)\nAiling(travers)\nKotow(travers, chance)\nBombproof(travers, chance)\nPlease(chance, travers)\nnot Fetal(chance)\nBold(chance)\nKotow(chance, travers)\nnot Bombproof(chance, travers)\nforall x (Please(x, travers) -> Kotow(travers, chance))\nforall x (Unfastened(x) -> Papal(x))\nforall x (Please(x, chance) and Bombproof(x, travers) -> not Please(x, travers))\nforall x (Unfastened(x) -> Bombproof(x, chance))\nforall x (Please(x, chance) -> Bombproof(x, travers))\nFetal(travers) and not Kotow(travers, chance) -> Bold(chance)\nforall x (Kotow(x, chance) and not Please(x, travers) -> not Kotow(x, travers))\nforall x (Bombproof(x, chance) and not Kotow(chance, travers) -> Bold(x))\n\nKotow(travers, travers)\n\nPlease(travers, chance) and forall x (Please(x, chance) -> Bombproof(x, travers)) -> therefore Bombproof(travers, travers) Please(travers, chance) and Bombproof(travers, travers) and forall x (Please(x, chance) and Bombproof(x, travers) -> not Please(x, travers)) -> therefore not Please(travers, travers) Kotow(travers, chance) and not Please(travers, travers) and forall x (Kotow(x, chance) and not Please(x, travers) -> not Kotow(x, travers)) -> therefore not Kotow(travers, travers)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The hakeem moisturise the fionna. The hakeem is allogeneic. The hakeem is inlaid. The hakeem is not creative. The hakeem is pitted. The hakeem racketeer the fionna. The hakeem empathize the fionna. The fionna moisturise the hakeem. The fionna is not inlaid. The fionna is creative. The fionna racketeer the hakeem. The fionna does not visit the hakeem. If someone moisturise the hakeem then the hakeem racketeer the fionna. If someone is allogeneic then they are onerous. If someone moisturise the fionna and they visit the hakeem then they do not eat the hakeem. If someone is allogeneic then they visit the fionna. If someone moisturise the fionna then they visit the hakeem. If the hakeem is inlaid and the hakeem does not see the fionna then the fionna is creative. If someone racketeer the fionna and they do not eat the hakeem then they do not see the hakeem. If someone empathize the fionna and the fionna does not see the hakeem then they are creative. The fionna does not visit the fionna.", "logic": "\nMoisturise(hakeem, fionna)\nAllogeneic(hakeem)\nInlaid(hakeem)\nnot Creative(hakeem)\nPitted(hakeem)\nRacketeer(hakeem, fionna)\nEmpathize(hakeem, fionna)\nMoisturise(fionna, hakeem)\nnot Inlaid(fionna)\nCreative(fionna)\nRacketeer(fionna, hakeem)\nnot Empathize(fionna, hakeem)\nforall x (Moisturise(x, hakeem) -> Racketeer(hakeem, fionna))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Onerous(x))\nforall x (Moisturise(x, fionna) and Empathize(x, hakeem) -> not Moisturise(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Empathize(x, fionna))\nforall x (Moisturise(x, fionna) -> Empathize(x, hakeem))\nInlaid(hakeem) and not Racketeer(hakeem, fionna) -> Creative(fionna)\nforall x (Racketeer(x, fionna) and not Moisturise(x, hakeem) -> not Racketeer(x, hakeem))\nforall x (Empathize(x, fionna) and not Racketeer(fionna, hakeem) -> Creative(x))\n\nnot Empathize(fionna, fionna)\n\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Empathize(x, fionna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The cris transude the albertine. The cris is adoptive. The cris is dutch. The cris is not intact. The cris is couthie. The cris incur the albertine. The cris latinise the albertine. The albertine transude the cris. The albertine is not dutch. The albertine is intact. The albertine incur the cris. The albertine does not visit the cris. If someone transude the cris then the cris incur the albertine. If someone is adoptive then they are motor. If someone transude the albertine and they visit the cris then they do not eat the cris. If someone is adoptive then they visit the albertine. If someone transude the albertine then they visit the cris. If the cris is dutch and the cris does not see the albertine then the albertine is intact. If someone incur the albertine and they do not eat the cris then they do not see the cris. If someone latinise the albertine and the albertine does not see the cris then they are intact. The albertine is motor.", "logic": "\nTransude(cris, albertine)\nAdoptive(cris)\nDutch(cris)\nnot Intact(cris)\nCouthie(cris)\nIncur(cris, albertine)\nLatinise(cris, albertine)\nTransude(albertine, cris)\nnot Dutch(albertine)\nIntact(albertine)\nIncur(albertine, cris)\nnot Latinise(albertine, cris)\nforall x (Transude(x, cris) -> Incur(cris, albertine))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Motor(x))\nforall x (Transude(x, albertine) and Latinise(x, cris) -> not Transude(x, cris))\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Latinise(x, albertine))\nforall x (Transude(x, albertine) -> Latinise(x, cris))\nDutch(cris) and not Incur(cris, albertine) -> Intact(albertine)\nforall x (Incur(x, albertine) and not Transude(x, cris) -> not Incur(x, cris))\nforall x (Latinise(x, albertine) and not Incur(albertine, cris) -> Intact(x))\n\nMotor(albertine)\n\nforall x (Adoptive(x) -> Motor(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The charita control the gertruda. The charita is uncurving. The charita is balconied. The charita is not thumbed. The charita is enamored. The charita fixate the gertruda. The charita enlist the gertruda. The gertruda control the charita. The gertruda is not balconied. The gertruda is thumbed. The gertruda fixate the charita. The gertruda does not visit the charita. If someone control the charita then the charita fixate the gertruda. If someone is uncurving then they are aphoristic. If someone control the gertruda and they visit the charita then they do not eat the charita. If someone is uncurving then they visit the gertruda. If someone control the gertruda then they visit the charita. If the charita is balconied and the charita does not see the gertruda then the gertruda is thumbed. If someone fixate the gertruda and they do not eat the charita then they do not see the charita. If someone enlist the gertruda and the gertruda does not see the charita then they are thumbed. The gertruda is not enamored.", "logic": "\nControl(charita, gertruda)\nUncurving(charita)\nBalconied(charita)\nnot Thumbed(charita)\nEnamored(charita)\nFixate(charita, gertruda)\nEnlist(charita, gertruda)\nControl(gertruda, charita)\nnot Balconied(gertruda)\nThumbed(gertruda)\nFixate(gertruda, charita)\nnot Enlist(gertruda, charita)\nforall x (Control(x, charita) -> Fixate(charita, gertruda))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Aphoristic(x))\nforall x (Control(x, gertruda) and Enlist(x, charita) -> not Control(x, charita))\nforall x (Uncurving(x) -> Enlist(x, gertruda))\nforall x (Control(x, gertruda) -> Enlist(x, charita))\nBalconied(charita) and not Fixate(charita, gertruda) -> Thumbed(gertruda)\nforall x (Fixate(x, gertruda) and not Control(x, charita) -> not Fixate(x, charita))\nforall x (Enlist(x, gertruda) and not Fixate(gertruda, charita) -> Thumbed(x))\n\nnot Enamored(gertruda)\n\nnot Enamored(gertruda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The caresse shirt the rubi. The caresse is neuter. The caresse is avertable. The caresse is not grooved. The caresse is nucleated. The caresse eternise the rubi. The caresse exert the rubi. The rubi shirt the caresse. The rubi is not avertable. The rubi is grooved. The rubi eternise the caresse. The rubi does not visit the caresse. If someone shirt the caresse then the caresse eternise the rubi. If someone is neuter then they are bountied. If someone shirt the rubi and they visit the caresse then they do not eat the caresse. If someone is neuter then they visit the rubi. If someone shirt the rubi then they visit the caresse. If the caresse is avertable and the caresse does not see the rubi then the rubi is grooved. If someone eternise the rubi and they do not eat the caresse then they do not see the caresse. If someone exert the rubi and the rubi does not see the caresse then they are grooved. The rubi eternise the rubi.", "logic": "\nShirt(caresse, rubi)\nNeuter(caresse)\nAvertable(caresse)\nnot Grooved(caresse)\nNucleated(caresse)\nEternise(caresse, rubi)\nExert(caresse, rubi)\nShirt(rubi, caresse)\nnot Avertable(rubi)\nGrooved(rubi)\nEternise(rubi, caresse)\nnot Exert(rubi, caresse)\nforall x (Shirt(x, caresse) -> Eternise(caresse, rubi))\nforall x (Neuter(x) -> Bountied(x))\nforall x (Shirt(x, rubi) and Exert(x, caresse) -> not Shirt(x, caresse))\nforall x (Neuter(x) -> Exert(x, rubi))\nforall x (Shirt(x, rubi) -> Exert(x, caresse))\nAvertable(caresse) and not Eternise(caresse, rubi) -> Grooved(rubi)\nforall x (Eternise(x, rubi) and not Shirt(x, caresse) -> not Eternise(x, caresse))\nforall x (Exert(x, rubi) and not Eternise(rubi, caresse) -> Grooved(x))\n\nEternise(rubi, rubi)\n\nEternise(rubi, rubi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The kriste jeer the matteo. The kriste is dolabrate. The kriste is talented. The kriste is not impressed. The kriste is forcible. The kriste unlade the matteo. The kriste surfboard the matteo. The matteo jeer the kriste. The matteo is not talented. The matteo is impressed. The matteo unlade the kriste. The matteo does not visit the kriste. If someone jeer the kriste then the kriste unlade the matteo. If someone is dolabrate then they are autumnal. If someone jeer the matteo and they visit the kriste then they do not eat the kriste. If someone is dolabrate then they visit the matteo. If someone jeer the matteo then they visit the kriste. If the kriste is talented and the kriste does not see the matteo then the matteo is impressed. If someone unlade the matteo and they do not eat the kriste then they do not see the kriste. If someone surfboard the matteo and the matteo does not see the kriste then they are impressed. The matteo does not eat the matteo.", "logic": "\nJeer(kriste, matteo)\nDolabrate(kriste)\nTalented(kriste)\nnot Impressed(kriste)\nForcible(kriste)\nUnlade(kriste, matteo)\nSurfboard(kriste, matteo)\nJeer(matteo, kriste)\nnot Talented(matteo)\nImpressed(matteo)\nUnlade(matteo, kriste)\nnot Surfboard(matteo, kriste)\nforall x (Jeer(x, kriste) -> Unlade(kriste, matteo))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Autumnal(x))\nforall x (Jeer(x, matteo) and Surfboard(x, kriste) -> not Jeer(x, kriste))\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Surfboard(x, matteo))\nforall x (Jeer(x, matteo) -> Surfboard(x, kriste))\nTalented(kriste) and not Unlade(kriste, matteo) -> Impressed(matteo)\nforall x (Unlade(x, matteo) and not Jeer(x, kriste) -> not Unlade(x, kriste))\nforall x (Surfboard(x, matteo) and not Unlade(matteo, kriste) -> Impressed(x))\n\nnot Jeer(matteo, matteo)\n\nnot Jeer(matteo, matteo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The sim loot the joelle. The sim is homy. The sim is gladdened. The sim is not floaty. The sim is crossed. The sim sock the joelle. The sim dynamite the joelle. The joelle loot the sim. The joelle is not gladdened. The joelle is floaty. The joelle sock the sim. The joelle does not visit the sim. If someone loot the sim then the sim sock the joelle. If someone is homy then they are lotic. If someone loot the joelle and they visit the sim then they do not eat the sim. If someone is homy then they visit the joelle. If someone loot the joelle then they visit the sim. If the sim is gladdened and the sim does not see the joelle then the joelle is floaty. If someone sock the joelle and they do not eat the sim then they do not see the sim. If someone dynamite the joelle and the joelle does not see the sim then they are floaty. The joelle is homy.", "logic": "\nLoot(sim, joelle)\nHomy(sim)\nGladdened(sim)\nnot Floaty(sim)\nCrossed(sim)\nSock(sim, joelle)\nDynamite(sim, joelle)\nLoot(joelle, sim)\nnot Gladdened(joelle)\nFloaty(joelle)\nSock(joelle, sim)\nnot Dynamite(joelle, sim)\nforall x (Loot(x, sim) -> Sock(sim, joelle))\nforall x (Homy(x) -> Lotic(x))\nforall x (Loot(x, joelle) and Dynamite(x, sim) -> not Loot(x, sim))\nforall x (Homy(x) -> Dynamite(x, joelle))\nforall x (Loot(x, joelle) -> Dynamite(x, sim))\nGladdened(sim) and not Sock(sim, joelle) -> Floaty(joelle)\nforall x (Sock(x, joelle) and not Loot(x, sim) -> not Sock(x, sim))\nforall x (Dynamite(x, joelle) and not Sock(joelle, sim) -> Floaty(x))\n\nHomy(joelle)\n\nHomy(joelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1419"} {"premises": "The athena does not chase the berri. The athena is inexpiable. The athena does not need the willetta. The athena does not see the berri. The berri actualize the athena. The berri is fordable. The berri douche the athena. The berri douche the willetta. The berri hiccup the athena. The willetta actualize the athena. The willetta actualize the berri. The willetta is inexpiable. The willetta douche the athena. The willetta does not need the berri. The willetta hiccup the athena. The willetta hiccup the berri. If someone actualize the berri then the berri is not swinging. If someone douche the athena and they see the willetta then the willetta hiccup the berri. If someone douche the berri then they chase the berri. If someone is inexpiable and they see the willetta then the willetta is not inexpiable. If someone actualize the berri then they see the athena. If someone actualize the athena then the athena does not need the willetta. If someone is fordable then they need the willetta. If someone is opalescent then they need the willetta. The willetta hiccup the berri.", "logic": "\nnot Actualize(athena, berri)\nInexpiable(athena)\nnot Douche(athena, willetta)\nnot Hiccup(athena, berri)\nActualize(berri, athena)\nFordable(berri)\nDouche(berri, athena)\nDouche(berri, willetta)\nHiccup(berri, athena)\nActualize(willetta, athena)\nActualize(willetta, berri)\nInexpiable(willetta)\nDouche(willetta, athena)\nnot Douche(willetta, berri)\nHiccup(willetta, athena)\nHiccup(willetta, berri)\nforall x (Actualize(x, berri) -> not Swinging(berri))\nforall x (Douche(x, athena) and Hiccup(x, willetta) -> Hiccup(willetta, berri))\nforall x (Douche(x, berri) -> Actualize(x, berri))\nforall x (Inexpiable(x) and Hiccup(x, willetta) -> not Inexpiable(willetta))\nforall x (Actualize(x, berri) -> Hiccup(x, athena))\nforall x (Actualize(x, athena) -> not Douche(athena, willetta))\nforall x (Fordable(x) -> Douche(x, willetta))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) -> Douche(x, willetta))\n\nHiccup(willetta, berri)\n\ntherefore Hiccup(willetta, berri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4801"} {"premises": "The sidnee does not chase the abbe. The sidnee is dynamic. The sidnee does not need the hadria. The sidnee does not see the abbe. The abbe prologuize the sidnee. The abbe is hostile. The abbe shellac the sidnee. The abbe shellac the hadria. The abbe club the sidnee. The hadria prologuize the sidnee. The hadria prologuize the abbe. The hadria is dynamic. The hadria shellac the sidnee. The hadria does not need the abbe. The hadria club the sidnee. The hadria club the abbe. If someone prologuize the abbe then the abbe is not saliferous. If someone shellac the sidnee and they see the hadria then the hadria club the abbe. If someone shellac the abbe then they chase the abbe. If someone is dynamic and they see the hadria then the hadria is not dynamic. If someone prologuize the abbe then they see the sidnee. If someone prologuize the sidnee then the sidnee does not need the hadria. If someone is hostile then they need the hadria. If someone is congolese then they need the hadria. The abbe is not hostile.", "logic": "\nnot Prologuize(sidnee, abbe)\nDynamic(sidnee)\nnot Shellac(sidnee, hadria)\nnot Club(sidnee, abbe)\nProloguize(abbe, sidnee)\nHostile(abbe)\nShellac(abbe, sidnee)\nShellac(abbe, hadria)\nClub(abbe, sidnee)\nProloguize(hadria, sidnee)\nProloguize(hadria, abbe)\nDynamic(hadria)\nShellac(hadria, sidnee)\nnot Shellac(hadria, abbe)\nClub(hadria, sidnee)\nClub(hadria, abbe)\nforall x (Prologuize(x, abbe) -> not Saliferous(abbe))\nforall x (Shellac(x, sidnee) and Club(x, hadria) -> Club(hadria, abbe))\nforall x (Shellac(x, abbe) -> Prologuize(x, abbe))\nforall x (Dynamic(x) and Club(x, hadria) -> not Dynamic(hadria))\nforall x (Prologuize(x, abbe) -> Club(x, sidnee))\nforall x (Prologuize(x, sidnee) -> not Shellac(sidnee, hadria))\nforall x (Hostile(x) -> Shellac(x, hadria))\nforall x (Congolese(x) -> Shellac(x, hadria))\n\nnot Hostile(abbe)\n\ntherefore Hostile(abbe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4801"} {"premises": "The wylie does not chase the reba. The wylie is spellbound. The wylie does not need the sacha. The wylie does not see the reba. The reba subvent the wylie. The reba is prescribed. The reba magnetise the wylie. The reba magnetise the sacha. The reba comfort the wylie. The sacha subvent the wylie. The sacha subvent the reba. The sacha is spellbound. The sacha magnetise the wylie. The sacha does not need the reba. The sacha comfort the wylie. The sacha comfort the reba. If someone subvent the reba then the reba is not dewy. If someone magnetise the wylie and they see the sacha then the sacha comfort the reba. If someone magnetise the reba then they chase the reba. If someone is spellbound and they see the sacha then the sacha is not spellbound. If someone subvent the reba then they see the wylie. If someone subvent the wylie then the wylie does not need the sacha. If someone is prescribed then they need the sacha. If someone is cystic then they need the sacha. The sacha does not need the sacha.", "logic": "\nnot Subvent(wylie, reba)\nSpellbound(wylie)\nnot Magnetise(wylie, sacha)\nnot Comfort(wylie, reba)\nSubvent(reba, wylie)\nPrescribed(reba)\nMagnetise(reba, wylie)\nMagnetise(reba, sacha)\nComfort(reba, wylie)\nSubvent(sacha, wylie)\nSubvent(sacha, reba)\nSpellbound(sacha)\nMagnetise(sacha, wylie)\nnot Magnetise(sacha, reba)\nComfort(sacha, wylie)\nComfort(sacha, reba)\nforall x (Subvent(x, reba) -> not Dewy(reba))\nforall x (Magnetise(x, wylie) and Comfort(x, sacha) -> Comfort(sacha, reba))\nforall x (Magnetise(x, reba) -> Subvent(x, reba))\nforall x (Spellbound(x) and Comfort(x, sacha) -> not Spellbound(sacha))\nforall x (Subvent(x, reba) -> Comfort(x, wylie))\nforall x (Subvent(x, wylie) -> not Magnetise(wylie, sacha))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) -> Magnetise(x, sacha))\nforall x (Cystic(x) -> Magnetise(x, sacha))\n\nnot Magnetise(sacha, sacha)\n\nforall x (Prescribed(x) -> Magnetise(x, sacha)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4801"} {"premises": "The levy does not chase the vernor. The levy is pretty. The levy does not need the tatiania. The levy does not see the vernor. The vernor jubilate the levy. The vernor is penal. The vernor carbonise the levy. The vernor carbonise the tatiania. The vernor cark the levy. The tatiania jubilate the levy. The tatiania jubilate the vernor. The tatiania is pretty. The tatiania carbonise the levy. The tatiania does not need the vernor. The tatiania cark the levy. The tatiania cark the vernor. If someone jubilate the vernor then the vernor is not nephritic. If someone carbonise the levy and they see the tatiania then the tatiania cark the vernor. If someone carbonise the vernor then they chase the vernor. If someone is pretty and they see the tatiania then the tatiania is not pretty. If someone jubilate the vernor then they see the levy. If someone jubilate the levy then the levy does not need the tatiania. If someone is penal then they need the tatiania. If someone is negligible then they need the tatiania. The vernor cark the vernor.", "logic": "\nnot Jubilate(levy, vernor)\nPretty(levy)\nnot Carbonise(levy, tatiania)\nnot Cark(levy, vernor)\nJubilate(vernor, levy)\nPenal(vernor)\nCarbonise(vernor, levy)\nCarbonise(vernor, tatiania)\nCark(vernor, levy)\nJubilate(tatiania, levy)\nJubilate(tatiania, vernor)\nPretty(tatiania)\nCarbonise(tatiania, levy)\nnot Carbonise(tatiania, vernor)\nCark(tatiania, levy)\nCark(tatiania, vernor)\nforall x (Jubilate(x, vernor) -> not Nephritic(vernor))\nforall x (Carbonise(x, levy) and Cark(x, tatiania) -> Cark(tatiania, vernor))\nforall x (Carbonise(x, vernor) -> Jubilate(x, vernor))\nforall x (Pretty(x) and Cark(x, tatiania) -> not Pretty(tatiania))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, vernor) -> Cark(x, levy))\nforall x (Jubilate(x, levy) -> not Carbonise(levy, tatiania))\nforall x (Penal(x) -> Carbonise(x, tatiania))\nforall x (Negligible(x) -> Carbonise(x, tatiania))\n\nCark(vernor, vernor)\n\nCark(vernor, vernor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4801"} {"premises": "The archibold bath the evey. The archibold is fulgurous. The archibold is phlegmatic. The archibold is pentagonal. The archibold is caulescent. The archibold is flavorful. The archibold fine the evey. The archibold currycomb the evey. The evey bath the archibold. The evey is fulgurous. The evey is phlegmatic. The evey is pentagonal. The evey is caulescent. The evey is flavorful. The evey fine the archibold. The evey currycomb the archibold. If someone fine the archibold and the archibold currycomb the evey then the evey is pentagonal. If the archibold currycomb the evey and the evey currycomb the archibold then the archibold is flavorful. If someone currycomb the archibold then they are phlegmatic. All pentagonal people are phlegmatic. If someone currycomb the evey then they eat the archibold. If someone fine the evey then they eat the evey. The evey bath the archibold.", "logic": "\nBath(archibold, evey)\nFulgurous(archibold)\nPhlegmatic(archibold)\nPentagonal(archibold)\nCaulescent(archibold)\nFlavorful(archibold)\nFine(archibold, evey)\nCurrycomb(archibold, evey)\nBath(evey, archibold)\nFulgurous(evey)\nPhlegmatic(evey)\nPentagonal(evey)\nCaulescent(evey)\nFlavorful(evey)\nFine(evey, archibold)\nCurrycomb(evey, archibold)\nforall x (Fine(x, archibold) and Currycomb(archibold, evey) -> Pentagonal(evey))\nCurrycomb(archibold, evey) and Currycomb(evey, archibold) -> Flavorful(archibold)\nforall x (Currycomb(x, archibold) -> Phlegmatic(x))\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\nforall x (Currycomb(x, evey) -> Bath(x, archibold))\nforall x (Fine(x, evey) -> Bath(x, evey))\n\nBath(evey, archibold)\n\ntherefore Bath(evey, archibold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The sibilla disco the mellisent. The sibilla is augustan. The sibilla is hundred. The sibilla is imaginable. The sibilla is uncomplete. The sibilla is photogenic. The sibilla effloresce the mellisent. The sibilla soil the mellisent. The mellisent disco the sibilla. The mellisent is augustan. The mellisent is hundred. The mellisent is imaginable. The mellisent is uncomplete. The mellisent is photogenic. The mellisent effloresce the sibilla. The mellisent soil the sibilla. If someone effloresce the sibilla and the sibilla soil the mellisent then the mellisent is imaginable. If the sibilla soil the mellisent and the mellisent soil the sibilla then the sibilla is photogenic. If someone soil the sibilla then they are hundred. All imaginable people are hundred. If someone soil the mellisent then they eat the sibilla. If someone effloresce the mellisent then they eat the mellisent. The mellisent is not uncomplete.", "logic": "\nDisco(sibilla, mellisent)\nAugustan(sibilla)\nHundred(sibilla)\nImaginable(sibilla)\nUncomplete(sibilla)\nPhotogenic(sibilla)\nEffloresce(sibilla, mellisent)\nSoil(sibilla, mellisent)\nDisco(mellisent, sibilla)\nAugustan(mellisent)\nHundred(mellisent)\nImaginable(mellisent)\nUncomplete(mellisent)\nPhotogenic(mellisent)\nEffloresce(mellisent, sibilla)\nSoil(mellisent, sibilla)\nforall x (Effloresce(x, sibilla) and Soil(sibilla, mellisent) -> Imaginable(mellisent))\nSoil(sibilla, mellisent) and Soil(mellisent, sibilla) -> Photogenic(sibilla)\nforall x (Soil(x, sibilla) -> Hundred(x))\nforall x (Imaginable(x) -> Hundred(x))\nforall x (Soil(x, mellisent) -> Disco(x, sibilla))\nforall x (Effloresce(x, mellisent) -> Disco(x, mellisent))\n\nnot Uncomplete(mellisent)\n\ntherefore Uncomplete(mellisent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The myrta outwear the danelle. The myrta is witting. The myrta is bisontine. The myrta is unleaded. The myrta is alarmed. The myrta is cespitose. The myrta conduce the danelle. The myrta westernize the danelle. The danelle outwear the myrta. The danelle is witting. The danelle is bisontine. The danelle is unleaded. The danelle is alarmed. The danelle is cespitose. The danelle conduce the myrta. The danelle westernize the myrta. If someone conduce the myrta and the myrta westernize the danelle then the danelle is unleaded. If the myrta westernize the danelle and the danelle westernize the myrta then the myrta is cespitose. If someone westernize the myrta then they are bisontine. All unleaded people are bisontine. If someone westernize the danelle then they eat the myrta. If someone conduce the danelle then they eat the danelle. The myrta outwear the myrta.", "logic": "\nOutwear(myrta, danelle)\nWitting(myrta)\nBisontine(myrta)\nUnleaded(myrta)\nAlarmed(myrta)\nCespitose(myrta)\nConduce(myrta, danelle)\nWesternize(myrta, danelle)\nOutwear(danelle, myrta)\nWitting(danelle)\nBisontine(danelle)\nUnleaded(danelle)\nAlarmed(danelle)\nCespitose(danelle)\nConduce(danelle, myrta)\nWesternize(danelle, myrta)\nforall x (Conduce(x, myrta) and Westernize(myrta, danelle) -> Unleaded(danelle))\nWesternize(myrta, danelle) and Westernize(danelle, myrta) -> Cespitose(myrta)\nforall x (Westernize(x, myrta) -> Bisontine(x))\nforall x (Unleaded(x) -> Bisontine(x))\nforall x (Westernize(x, danelle) -> Outwear(x, myrta))\nforall x (Conduce(x, danelle) -> Outwear(x, danelle))\n\nOutwear(myrta, myrta)\n\nWesternize(myrta, danelle) and forall x (Westernize(x, danelle) -> Outwear(x, myrta)) -> therefore Outwear(myrta, myrta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The nora enslave the clayton. The nora is ambivalent. The nora is rousseauan. The nora is voidable. The nora is unknowing. The nora is clueless. The nora rank the clayton. The nora infringe the clayton. The clayton enslave the nora. The clayton is ambivalent. The clayton is rousseauan. The clayton is voidable. The clayton is unknowing. The clayton is clueless. The clayton rank the nora. The clayton infringe the nora. If someone rank the nora and the nora infringe the clayton then the clayton is voidable. If the nora infringe the clayton and the clayton infringe the nora then the nora is clueless. If someone infringe the nora then they are rousseauan. All voidable people are rousseauan. If someone infringe the clayton then they eat the nora. If someone rank the clayton then they eat the clayton. The nora does not eat the nora.", "logic": "\nEnslave(nora, clayton)\nAmbivalent(nora)\nRousseauan(nora)\nVoidable(nora)\nUnknowing(nora)\nClueless(nora)\nRank(nora, clayton)\nInfringe(nora, clayton)\nEnslave(clayton, nora)\nAmbivalent(clayton)\nRousseauan(clayton)\nVoidable(clayton)\nUnknowing(clayton)\nClueless(clayton)\nRank(clayton, nora)\nInfringe(clayton, nora)\nforall x (Rank(x, nora) and Infringe(nora, clayton) -> Voidable(clayton))\nInfringe(nora, clayton) and Infringe(clayton, nora) -> Clueless(nora)\nforall x (Infringe(x, nora) -> Rousseauan(x))\nforall x (Voidable(x) -> Rousseauan(x))\nforall x (Infringe(x, clayton) -> Enslave(x, nora))\nforall x (Rank(x, clayton) -> Enslave(x, clayton))\n\nnot Enslave(nora, nora)\n\nInfringe(nora, clayton) and forall x (Infringe(x, clayton) -> Enslave(x, nora)) -> therefore Enslave(nora, nora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The christa quantize the damita. The christa is designed. The christa is pulmonic. The christa is rumanian. The christa is relational. The christa is many. The christa posture the damita. The christa invent the damita. The damita quantize the christa. The damita is designed. The damita is pulmonic. The damita is rumanian. The damita is relational. The damita is many. The damita posture the christa. The damita invent the christa. If someone posture the christa and the christa invent the damita then the damita is rumanian. If the christa invent the damita and the damita invent the christa then the christa is many. If someone invent the christa then they are pulmonic. All rumanian people are pulmonic. If someone invent the damita then they eat the christa. If someone posture the damita then they eat the damita. The damita does not eat the damita.", "logic": "\nQuantize(christa, damita)\nDesigned(christa)\nPulmonic(christa)\nRumanian(christa)\nRelational(christa)\nMany(christa)\nPosture(christa, damita)\nInvent(christa, damita)\nQuantize(damita, christa)\nDesigned(damita)\nPulmonic(damita)\nRumanian(damita)\nRelational(damita)\nMany(damita)\nPosture(damita, christa)\nInvent(damita, christa)\nforall x (Posture(x, christa) and Invent(christa, damita) -> Rumanian(damita))\nInvent(christa, damita) and Invent(damita, christa) -> Many(christa)\nforall x (Invent(x, christa) -> Pulmonic(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) -> Pulmonic(x))\nforall x (Invent(x, damita) -> Quantize(x, christa))\nforall x (Posture(x, damita) -> Quantize(x, damita))\n\nnot Quantize(damita, damita)\n\nforall x (Posture(x, damita) -> Quantize(x, damita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The caterina overextend the urban. The caterina is diarrheic. The caterina is leafy. The caterina is cussed. The caterina is wysiwyg. The caterina is enured. The caterina dash the urban. The caterina distract the urban. The urban overextend the caterina. The urban is diarrheic. The urban is leafy. The urban is cussed. The urban is wysiwyg. The urban is enured. The urban dash the caterina. The urban distract the caterina. If someone dash the caterina and the caterina distract the urban then the urban is cussed. If the caterina distract the urban and the urban distract the caterina then the caterina is enured. If someone distract the caterina then they are leafy. All cussed people are leafy. If someone distract the urban then they eat the caterina. If someone dash the urban then they eat the urban. The caterina dash the caterina.", "logic": "\nOverextend(caterina, urban)\nDiarrheic(caterina)\nLeafy(caterina)\nCussed(caterina)\nWysiwyg(caterina)\nEnured(caterina)\nDash(caterina, urban)\nDistract(caterina, urban)\nOverextend(urban, caterina)\nDiarrheic(urban)\nLeafy(urban)\nCussed(urban)\nWysiwyg(urban)\nEnured(urban)\nDash(urban, caterina)\nDistract(urban, caterina)\nforall x (Dash(x, caterina) and Distract(caterina, urban) -> Cussed(urban))\nDistract(caterina, urban) and Distract(urban, caterina) -> Enured(caterina)\nforall x (Distract(x, caterina) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Cussed(x) -> Leafy(x))\nforall x (Distract(x, urban) -> Overextend(x, caterina))\nforall x (Dash(x, urban) -> Overextend(x, urban))\n\nDash(caterina, caterina)\n\nDash(caterina, caterina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The lindsay palatalize the laina. The lindsay is consenting. The lindsay is spiderlike. The lindsay is standard. The lindsay is stewed. The lindsay is thick. The lindsay habilitate the laina. The lindsay defang the laina. The laina palatalize the lindsay. The laina is consenting. The laina is spiderlike. The laina is standard. The laina is stewed. The laina is thick. The laina habilitate the lindsay. The laina defang the lindsay. If someone habilitate the lindsay and the lindsay defang the laina then the laina is standard. If the lindsay defang the laina and the laina defang the lindsay then the lindsay is thick. If someone defang the lindsay then they are spiderlike. All standard people are spiderlike. If someone defang the laina then they eat the lindsay. If someone habilitate the laina then they eat the laina. The laina does not like the laina.", "logic": "\nPalatalize(lindsay, laina)\nConsenting(lindsay)\nSpiderlike(lindsay)\nStandard(lindsay)\nStewed(lindsay)\nThick(lindsay)\nHabilitate(lindsay, laina)\nDefang(lindsay, laina)\nPalatalize(laina, lindsay)\nConsenting(laina)\nSpiderlike(laina)\nStandard(laina)\nStewed(laina)\nThick(laina)\nHabilitate(laina, lindsay)\nDefang(laina, lindsay)\nforall x (Habilitate(x, lindsay) and Defang(lindsay, laina) -> Standard(laina))\nDefang(lindsay, laina) and Defang(laina, lindsay) -> Thick(lindsay)\nforall x (Defang(x, lindsay) -> Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) -> Spiderlike(x))\nforall x (Defang(x, laina) -> Palatalize(x, lindsay))\nforall x (Habilitate(x, laina) -> Palatalize(x, laina))\n\nnot Habilitate(laina, laina)\n\nnot Habilitate(laina, laina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The barbara suntan the ulrick. The barbara is bedless. The barbara is laden. The barbara is stygian. The barbara is unmourned. The barbara is petty. The barbara reconcile the ulrick. The barbara stud the ulrick. The ulrick suntan the barbara. The ulrick is bedless. The ulrick is laden. The ulrick is stygian. The ulrick is unmourned. The ulrick is petty. The ulrick reconcile the barbara. The ulrick stud the barbara. If someone reconcile the barbara and the barbara stud the ulrick then the ulrick is stygian. If the barbara stud the ulrick and the ulrick stud the barbara then the barbara is petty. If someone stud the barbara then they are laden. All stygian people are laden. If someone stud the ulrick then they eat the barbara. If someone reconcile the ulrick then they eat the ulrick. The barbara stud the barbara.", "logic": "\nSuntan(barbara, ulrick)\nBedless(barbara)\nLaden(barbara)\nStygian(barbara)\nUnmourned(barbara)\nPetty(barbara)\nReconcile(barbara, ulrick)\nStud(barbara, ulrick)\nSuntan(ulrick, barbara)\nBedless(ulrick)\nLaden(ulrick)\nStygian(ulrick)\nUnmourned(ulrick)\nPetty(ulrick)\nReconcile(ulrick, barbara)\nStud(ulrick, barbara)\nforall x (Reconcile(x, barbara) and Stud(barbara, ulrick) -> Stygian(ulrick))\nStud(barbara, ulrick) and Stud(ulrick, barbara) -> Petty(barbara)\nforall x (Stud(x, barbara) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Stygian(x) -> Laden(x))\nforall x (Stud(x, ulrick) -> Suntan(x, barbara))\nforall x (Reconcile(x, ulrick) -> Suntan(x, ulrick))\n\nStud(barbara, barbara)\n\nStud(barbara, barbara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3019"} {"premises": "The nevil prise the danita. The danita prise the nevil. If something federate the danita and the danita prise the nevil then it is bluish. All disturbed things are bluish. If something federate the danita then it federate the nevil. If something twin the nevil then the nevil twin the danita. If the danita is bluish then the danita federate the nevil. If something federate the danita then it twin the nevil. If something prise the nevil then it federate the danita. If something is magnetized and it twin the nevil then the nevil prise the danita. The danita prise the nevil.", "logic": "\nPrise(nevil, danita)\nPrise(danita, nevil)\nforall x (Federate(x, danita) and Prise(danita, nevil) -> Bluish(x))\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Bluish(x))\nforall x (Federate(x, danita) -> Federate(x, nevil))\nforall x (Twin(x, nevil) -> Twin(nevil, danita))\nBluish(danita) -> Federate(danita, nevil)\nforall x (Federate(x, danita) -> Twin(x, nevil))\nforall x (Prise(x, nevil) -> Federate(x, danita))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) and Twin(x, nevil) -> Prise(nevil, danita))\n\nPrise(danita, nevil)\n\ntherefore Prise(danita, nevil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The avrit string the gina. The gina string the avrit. If something skate the gina and the gina string the avrit then it is coptic. All insurable things are coptic. If something skate the gina then it skate the avrit. If something whiten the avrit then the avrit whiten the gina. If the gina is coptic then the gina skate the avrit. If something skate the gina then it whiten the avrit. If something string the avrit then it skate the gina. If something is endearing and it whiten the avrit then the avrit string the gina. The avrit does not see the gina.", "logic": "\nString(avrit, gina)\nString(gina, avrit)\nforall x (Skate(x, gina) and String(gina, avrit) -> Coptic(x))\nforall x (Insurable(x) -> Coptic(x))\nforall x (Skate(x, gina) -> Skate(x, avrit))\nforall x (Whiten(x, avrit) -> Whiten(avrit, gina))\nCoptic(gina) -> Skate(gina, avrit)\nforall x (Skate(x, gina) -> Whiten(x, avrit))\nforall x (String(x, avrit) -> Skate(x, gina))\nforall x (Endearing(x) and Whiten(x, avrit) -> String(avrit, gina))\n\nnot String(avrit, gina)\n\ntherefore String(avrit, gina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The eleonora recrudesce the pincus. The pincus recrudesce the eleonora. If something auctioneer the pincus and the pincus recrudesce the eleonora then it is nominated. All apish things are nominated. If something auctioneer the pincus then it auctioneer the eleonora. If something airmail the eleonora then the eleonora airmail the pincus. If the pincus is nominated then the pincus auctioneer the eleonora. If something auctioneer the pincus then it airmail the eleonora. If something recrudesce the eleonora then it auctioneer the pincus. If something is unanswered and it airmail the eleonora then the eleonora recrudesce the pincus. The pincus auctioneer the pincus.", "logic": "\nRecrudesce(eleonora, pincus)\nRecrudesce(pincus, eleonora)\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, pincus) and Recrudesce(pincus, eleonora) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Apish(x) -> Nominated(x))\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, pincus) -> Auctioneer(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Airmail(x, eleonora) -> Airmail(eleonora, pincus))\nNominated(pincus) -> Auctioneer(pincus, eleonora)\nforall x (Auctioneer(x, pincus) -> Airmail(x, eleonora))\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, eleonora) -> Auctioneer(x, pincus))\nforall x (Unanswered(x) and Airmail(x, eleonora) -> Recrudesce(eleonora, pincus))\n\nAuctioneer(pincus, pincus)\n\nRecrudesce(pincus, eleonora) and forall x (Recrudesce(x, eleonora) -> Auctioneer(x, pincus)) -> therefore Auctioneer(pincus, pincus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The april iridesce the liane. The liane iridesce the april. If something fulfill the liane and the liane iridesce the april then it is azoic. All painted things are azoic. If something fulfill the liane then it fulfill the april. If something wheeze the april then the april wheeze the liane. If the liane is azoic then the liane fulfill the april. If something fulfill the liane then it wheeze the april. If something iridesce the april then it fulfill the liane. If something is acronymic and it wheeze the april then the april iridesce the liane. The liane does not chase the liane.", "logic": "\nIridesce(april, liane)\nIridesce(liane, april)\nforall x (Fulfill(x, liane) and Iridesce(liane, april) -> Azoic(x))\nforall x (Painted(x) -> Azoic(x))\nforall x (Fulfill(x, liane) -> Fulfill(x, april))\nforall x (Wheeze(x, april) -> Wheeze(april, liane))\nAzoic(liane) -> Fulfill(liane, april)\nforall x (Fulfill(x, liane) -> Wheeze(x, april))\nforall x (Iridesce(x, april) -> Fulfill(x, liane))\nforall x (Acronymic(x) and Wheeze(x, april) -> Iridesce(april, liane))\n\nnot Fulfill(liane, liane)\n\nIridesce(liane, april) and forall x (Iridesce(x, april) -> Fulfill(x, liane)) -> therefore Fulfill(liane, liane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The stu ship the nealon. The nealon ship the stu. If something handcraft the nealon and the nealon ship the stu then it is semiarid. All bottommost things are semiarid. If something handcraft the nealon then it handcraft the stu. If something paragraph the stu then the stu paragraph the nealon. If the nealon is semiarid then the nealon handcraft the stu. If something handcraft the nealon then it paragraph the stu. If something ship the stu then it handcraft the nealon. If something is enforced and it paragraph the stu then the stu ship the nealon. The nealon handcraft the stu.", "logic": "\nShip(stu, nealon)\nShip(nealon, stu)\nforall x (Handcraft(x, nealon) and Ship(nealon, stu) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Bottommost(x) -> Semiarid(x))\nforall x (Handcraft(x, nealon) -> Handcraft(x, stu))\nforall x (Paragraph(x, stu) -> Paragraph(stu, nealon))\nSemiarid(nealon) -> Handcraft(nealon, stu)\nforall x (Handcraft(x, nealon) -> Paragraph(x, stu))\nforall x (Ship(x, stu) -> Handcraft(x, nealon))\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Paragraph(x, stu) -> Ship(stu, nealon))\n\nHandcraft(nealon, stu)\n\nShip(nealon, stu) and forall x (Ship(x, stu) -> Handcraft(x, nealon)) -> therefore Handcraft(nealon, nealon) Handcraft(nealon, nealon) and forall x (Handcraft(x, nealon) -> Handcraft(x, stu)) -> therefore Handcraft(nealon, stu)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The ashli flirt the gallagher. The gallagher flirt the ashli. If something expense the gallagher and the gallagher flirt the ashli then it is befitting. All colorectal things are befitting. If something expense the gallagher then it expense the ashli. If something wawl the ashli then the ashli wawl the gallagher. If the gallagher is befitting then the gallagher expense the ashli. If something expense the gallagher then it wawl the ashli. If something flirt the ashli then it expense the gallagher. If something is chemical and it wawl the ashli then the ashli flirt the gallagher. The gallagher does not chase the ashli.", "logic": "\nFlirt(ashli, gallagher)\nFlirt(gallagher, ashli)\nforall x (Expense(x, gallagher) and Flirt(gallagher, ashli) -> Befitting(x))\nforall x (Colorectal(x) -> Befitting(x))\nforall x (Expense(x, gallagher) -> Expense(x, ashli))\nforall x (Wawl(x, ashli) -> Wawl(ashli, gallagher))\nBefitting(gallagher) -> Expense(gallagher, ashli)\nforall x (Expense(x, gallagher) -> Wawl(x, ashli))\nforall x (Flirt(x, ashli) -> Expense(x, gallagher))\nforall x (Chemical(x) and Wawl(x, ashli) -> Flirt(ashli, gallagher))\n\nnot Expense(gallagher, ashli)\n\nFlirt(gallagher, ashli) and forall x (Flirt(x, ashli) -> Expense(x, gallagher)) -> therefore Expense(gallagher, gallagher) Expense(gallagher, gallagher) and forall x (Expense(x, gallagher) -> Expense(x, ashli)) -> therefore Expense(gallagher, ashli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The fallon sandbag the sharna. The sharna sandbag the fallon. If something engulf the sharna and the sharna sandbag the fallon then it is separate. All turbaned things are separate. If something engulf the sharna then it engulf the fallon. If something worry the fallon then the fallon worry the sharna. If the sharna is separate then the sharna engulf the fallon. If something engulf the sharna then it worry the fallon. If something sandbag the fallon then it engulf the sharna. If something is middlemost and it worry the fallon then the fallon sandbag the sharna. The fallon worry the sharna.", "logic": "\nSandbag(fallon, sharna)\nSandbag(sharna, fallon)\nforall x (Engulf(x, sharna) and Sandbag(sharna, fallon) -> Separate(x))\nforall x (Turbaned(x) -> Separate(x))\nforall x (Engulf(x, sharna) -> Engulf(x, fallon))\nforall x (Worry(x, fallon) -> Worry(fallon, sharna))\nSeparate(sharna) -> Engulf(sharna, fallon)\nforall x (Engulf(x, sharna) -> Worry(x, fallon))\nforall x (Sandbag(x, fallon) -> Engulf(x, sharna))\nforall x (Middlemost(x) and Worry(x, fallon) -> Sandbag(fallon, sharna))\n\nWorry(fallon, sharna)\n\nSandbag(sharna, fallon) and forall x (Sandbag(x, fallon) -> Engulf(x, sharna)) -> therefore Engulf(sharna, sharna) Engulf(sharna, sharna) and forall x (Engulf(x, sharna) -> Worry(x, fallon)) -> therefore Worry(sharna, fallon) Worry(sharna, fallon) and forall x (Worry(x, fallon) -> Worry(fallon, sharna)) -> therefore Worry(fallon, sharna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The secunda forgather the geri. The geri forgather the secunda. If something racket the geri and the geri forgather the secunda then it is mitigative. All continuant things are mitigative. If something racket the geri then it racket the secunda. If something consult the secunda then the secunda consult the geri. If the geri is mitigative then the geri racket the secunda. If something racket the geri then it consult the secunda. If something forgather the secunda then it racket the geri. If something is iterative and it consult the secunda then the secunda forgather the geri. The secunda does not visit the geri.", "logic": "\nForgather(secunda, geri)\nForgather(geri, secunda)\nforall x (Racket(x, geri) and Forgather(geri, secunda) -> Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Mitigative(x))\nforall x (Racket(x, geri) -> Racket(x, secunda))\nforall x (Consult(x, secunda) -> Consult(secunda, geri))\nMitigative(geri) -> Racket(geri, secunda)\nforall x (Racket(x, geri) -> Consult(x, secunda))\nforall x (Forgather(x, secunda) -> Racket(x, geri))\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Consult(x, secunda) -> Forgather(secunda, geri))\n\nnot Consult(secunda, geri)\n\nForgather(geri, secunda) and forall x (Forgather(x, secunda) -> Racket(x, geri)) -> therefore Racket(geri, geri) Racket(geri, geri) and forall x (Racket(x, geri) -> Consult(x, secunda)) -> therefore Consult(geri, secunda) Consult(geri, secunda) and forall x (Consult(x, secunda) -> Consult(secunda, geri)) -> therefore Consult(secunda, geri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The evie swag the aleks. The aleks swag the evie. If something tyrannize the aleks and the aleks swag the evie then it is unplayful. All euphonical things are unplayful. If something tyrannize the aleks then it tyrannize the evie. If something converse the evie then the evie converse the aleks. If the aleks is unplayful then the aleks tyrannize the evie. If something tyrannize the aleks then it converse the evie. If something swag the evie then it tyrannize the aleks. If something is carsick and it converse the evie then the evie swag the aleks. The evie does not chase the evie.", "logic": "\nSwag(evie, aleks)\nSwag(aleks, evie)\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, aleks) and Swag(aleks, evie) -> Unplayful(x))\nforall x (Euphonical(x) -> Unplayful(x))\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, aleks) -> Tyrannize(x, evie))\nforall x (Converse(x, evie) -> Converse(evie, aleks))\nUnplayful(aleks) -> Tyrannize(aleks, evie)\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, aleks) -> Converse(x, evie))\nforall x (Swag(x, evie) -> Tyrannize(x, aleks))\nforall x (Carsick(x) and Converse(x, evie) -> Swag(evie, aleks))\n\nnot Tyrannize(evie, evie)\n\nforall x (Tyrannize(x, aleks) -> Tyrannize(x, evie)) <- forall x (Swag(x, evie) -> Tyrannize(x, aleks)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The megan clean the kata. The kata clean the megan. If something feminise the kata and the kata clean the megan then it is rheologic. All cattish things are rheologic. If something feminise the kata then it feminise the megan. If something streamline the megan then the megan streamline the kata. If the kata is rheologic then the kata feminise the megan. If something feminise the kata then it streamline the megan. If something clean the megan then it feminise the kata. If something is squiggly and it streamline the megan then the megan clean the kata. The megan is rheologic.", "logic": "\nClean(megan, kata)\nClean(kata, megan)\nforall x (Feminise(x, kata) and Clean(kata, megan) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Cattish(x) -> Rheologic(x))\nforall x (Feminise(x, kata) -> Feminise(x, megan))\nforall x (Streamline(x, megan) -> Streamline(megan, kata))\nRheologic(kata) -> Feminise(kata, megan)\nforall x (Feminise(x, kata) -> Streamline(x, megan))\nforall x (Clean(x, megan) -> Feminise(x, kata))\nforall x (Squiggly(x) and Streamline(x, megan) -> Clean(megan, kata))\n\nRheologic(megan)\n\nforall x (Feminise(x, kata) and Clean(kata, megan) -> Rheologic(x)) <- forall x (Clean(x, megan) -> Feminise(x, kata)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The sylvia convert the cathi. The cathi convert the sylvia. If something wield the cathi and the cathi convert the sylvia then it is forbidding. All floppy things are forbidding. If something wield the cathi then it wield the sylvia. If something weekend the sylvia then the sylvia weekend the cathi. If the cathi is forbidding then the cathi wield the sylvia. If something wield the cathi then it weekend the sylvia. If something convert the sylvia then it wield the cathi. If something is wrapped and it weekend the sylvia then the sylvia convert the cathi. The sylvia does not chase the cathi.", "logic": "\nConvert(sylvia, cathi)\nConvert(cathi, sylvia)\nforall x (Wield(x, cathi) and Convert(cathi, sylvia) -> Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Floppy(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Wield(x, cathi) -> Wield(x, sylvia))\nforall x (Weekend(x, sylvia) -> Weekend(sylvia, cathi))\nForbidding(cathi) -> Wield(cathi, sylvia)\nforall x (Wield(x, cathi) -> Weekend(x, sylvia))\nforall x (Convert(x, sylvia) -> Wield(x, cathi))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) and Weekend(x, sylvia) -> Convert(sylvia, cathi))\n\nnot Wield(sylvia, cathi)\n\nforall x (Convert(x, sylvia) -> Wield(x, cathi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The chase pimp the barney. The barney pimp the chase. If something grip the barney and the barney pimp the chase then it is bursiform. All adulterant things are bursiform. If something grip the barney then it grip the chase. If something rely the chase then the chase rely the barney. If the barney is bursiform then the barney grip the chase. If something grip the barney then it rely the chase. If something pimp the chase then it grip the barney. If something is astomatal and it rely the chase then the chase pimp the barney. The chase rely the chase.", "logic": "\nPimp(chase, barney)\nPimp(barney, chase)\nforall x (Grip(x, barney) and Pimp(barney, chase) -> Bursiform(x))\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> Bursiform(x))\nforall x (Grip(x, barney) -> Grip(x, chase))\nforall x (Rely(x, chase) -> Rely(chase, barney))\nBursiform(barney) -> Grip(barney, chase)\nforall x (Grip(x, barney) -> Rely(x, chase))\nforall x (Pimp(x, chase) -> Grip(x, barney))\nforall x (Astomatal(x) and Rely(x, chase) -> Pimp(chase, barney))\n\nRely(chase, chase)\n\nforall x (Grip(x, barney) -> Rely(x, chase)) <- forall x (Pimp(x, chase) -> Grip(x, barney)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The lydia redound the doloritas. The doloritas redound the lydia. If something fragment the doloritas and the doloritas redound the lydia then it is oblong. All fidgety things are oblong. If something fragment the doloritas then it fragment the lydia. If something avulse the lydia then the lydia avulse the doloritas. If the doloritas is oblong then the doloritas fragment the lydia. If something fragment the doloritas then it avulse the lydia. If something redound the lydia then it fragment the doloritas. If something is furnished and it avulse the lydia then the lydia redound the doloritas. The doloritas is not furnished.", "logic": "\nRedound(lydia, doloritas)\nRedound(doloritas, lydia)\nforall x (Fragment(x, doloritas) and Redound(doloritas, lydia) -> Oblong(x))\nforall x (Fidgety(x) -> Oblong(x))\nforall x (Fragment(x, doloritas) -> Fragment(x, lydia))\nforall x (Avulse(x, lydia) -> Avulse(lydia, doloritas))\nOblong(doloritas) -> Fragment(doloritas, lydia)\nforall x (Fragment(x, doloritas) -> Avulse(x, lydia))\nforall x (Redound(x, lydia) -> Fragment(x, doloritas))\nforall x (Furnished(x) and Avulse(x, lydia) -> Redound(lydia, doloritas))\n\nnot Furnished(doloritas)\n\nnot Furnished(doloritas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The lavinie distress the giovanne. The giovanne distress the lavinie. If something prate the giovanne and the giovanne distress the lavinie then it is cropped. All campy things are cropped. If something prate the giovanne then it prate the lavinie. If something resift the lavinie then the lavinie resift the giovanne. If the giovanne is cropped then the giovanne prate the lavinie. If something prate the giovanne then it resift the lavinie. If something distress the lavinie then it prate the giovanne. If something is slivery and it resift the lavinie then the lavinie distress the giovanne. The giovanne resift the giovanne.", "logic": "\nDistress(lavinie, giovanne)\nDistress(giovanne, lavinie)\nforall x (Prate(x, giovanne) and Distress(giovanne, lavinie) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Cropped(x))\nforall x (Prate(x, giovanne) -> Prate(x, lavinie))\nforall x (Resift(x, lavinie) -> Resift(lavinie, giovanne))\nCropped(giovanne) -> Prate(giovanne, lavinie)\nforall x (Prate(x, giovanne) -> Resift(x, lavinie))\nforall x (Distress(x, lavinie) -> Prate(x, giovanne))\nforall x (Slivery(x) and Resift(x, lavinie) -> Distress(lavinie, giovanne))\n\nResift(giovanne, giovanne)\n\nResift(giovanne, giovanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The elfie engild the zechariah. The zechariah engild the elfie. If something administer the zechariah and the zechariah engild the elfie then it is tremulous. All unoriented things are tremulous. If something administer the zechariah then it administer the elfie. If something rivet the elfie then the elfie rivet the zechariah. If the zechariah is tremulous then the zechariah administer the elfie. If something administer the zechariah then it rivet the elfie. If something engild the elfie then it administer the zechariah. If something is lank and it rivet the elfie then the elfie engild the zechariah. The zechariah is not big.", "logic": "\nEngild(elfie, zechariah)\nEngild(zechariah, elfie)\nforall x (Administer(x, zechariah) and Engild(zechariah, elfie) -> Tremulous(x))\nforall x (Unoriented(x) -> Tremulous(x))\nforall x (Administer(x, zechariah) -> Administer(x, elfie))\nforall x (Rivet(x, elfie) -> Rivet(elfie, zechariah))\nTremulous(zechariah) -> Administer(zechariah, elfie)\nforall x (Administer(x, zechariah) -> Rivet(x, elfie))\nforall x (Engild(x, elfie) -> Administer(x, zechariah))\nforall x (Lank(x) and Rivet(x, elfie) -> Engild(elfie, zechariah))\n\nnot Big(zechariah)\n\nnot Big(zechariah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The silvana hybridise the joli. The joli hybridise the silvana. If something allegorize the joli and the joli hybridise the silvana then it is shuha. All serflike things are shuha. If something allegorize the joli then it allegorize the silvana. If something shepherd the silvana then the silvana shepherd the joli. If the joli is shuha then the joli allegorize the silvana. If something allegorize the joli then it shepherd the silvana. If something hybridise the silvana then it allegorize the joli. If something is operable and it shepherd the silvana then the silvana hybridise the joli. The joli is cold.", "logic": "\nHybridise(silvana, joli)\nHybridise(joli, silvana)\nforall x (Allegorize(x, joli) and Hybridise(joli, silvana) -> Shuha(x))\nforall x (Serflike(x) -> Shuha(x))\nforall x (Allegorize(x, joli) -> Allegorize(x, silvana))\nforall x (Shepherd(x, silvana) -> Shepherd(silvana, joli))\nShuha(joli) -> Allegorize(joli, silvana)\nforall x (Allegorize(x, joli) -> Shepherd(x, silvana))\nforall x (Hybridise(x, silvana) -> Allegorize(x, joli))\nforall x (Operable(x) and Shepherd(x, silvana) -> Hybridise(silvana, joli))\n\nCold(joli)\n\nCold(joli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-106"} {"premises": "The sherline is donatist. The sherline brief the nelle. The sherline brief the courtenay. The sherline brief the fazeel. The nelle is cuspated. The nelle is brickle. The nelle fight the sherline. The nelle formicate the fazeel. The courtenay fight the sherline. The courtenay fight the fazeel. The courtenay formicate the nelle. The fazeel is donatist. The fazeel is brickle. The fazeel brief the sherline. The fazeel brief the courtenay. The fazeel formicate the sherline. If someone fight the nelle then they need the courtenay. If someone fight the nelle and the nelle is taciturn then the nelle brief the fazeel. If the fazeel fight the nelle then the fazeel brief the nelle. If someone brief the nelle then they are taciturn. Cold, donatist people are untired. If someone is taciturn and donatist then they need the nelle. If someone formicate the nelle then they need the courtenay. If someone formicate the courtenay then they like the sherline. The fazeel brief the sherline.", "logic": "\nDonatist(sherline)\nBrief(sherline, nelle)\nBrief(sherline, courtenay)\nBrief(sherline, fazeel)\nCuspated(nelle)\nBrickle(nelle)\nFight(nelle, sherline)\nFormicate(nelle, fazeel)\nFight(courtenay, sherline)\nFight(courtenay, fazeel)\nFormicate(courtenay, nelle)\nDonatist(fazeel)\nBrickle(fazeel)\nBrief(fazeel, sherline)\nBrief(fazeel, courtenay)\nFormicate(fazeel, sherline)\nforall x (Fight(x, nelle) -> Fight(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Fight(x, nelle) and Taciturn(nelle) -> Brief(nelle, fazeel))\nFight(fazeel, nelle) -> Brief(fazeel, nelle)\nforall x (Brief(x, nelle) -> Taciturn(x))\nforall x (Taciturn(x) and Donatist(x) -> Untired(x))\nforall x (Taciturn(x) and Donatist(x) -> Fight(x, nelle))\nforall x (Formicate(x, nelle) -> Fight(x, courtenay))\nforall x (Formicate(x, courtenay) -> Brief(x, sherline))\n\nBrief(fazeel, sherline)\n\ntherefore Brief(fazeel, sherline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The easton is doable. The easton whet the woochang. The easton whet the tabor. The easton whet the georgina. The woochang is rainy. The woochang is idealistic. The woochang caddie the easton. The woochang admire the georgina. The tabor caddie the easton. The tabor caddie the georgina. The tabor admire the woochang. The georgina is doable. The georgina is idealistic. The georgina whet the easton. The georgina whet the tabor. The georgina admire the easton. If someone caddie the woochang then they need the tabor. If someone caddie the woochang and the woochang is abomasal then the woochang whet the georgina. If the georgina caddie the woochang then the georgina whet the woochang. If someone whet the woochang then they are abomasal. Cold, doable people are animate. If someone is abomasal and doable then they need the woochang. If someone admire the woochang then they need the tabor. If someone admire the tabor then they like the easton. The georgina does not like the easton.", "logic": "\nDoable(easton)\nWhet(easton, woochang)\nWhet(easton, tabor)\nWhet(easton, georgina)\nRainy(woochang)\nIdealistic(woochang)\nCaddie(woochang, easton)\nAdmire(woochang, georgina)\nCaddie(tabor, easton)\nCaddie(tabor, georgina)\nAdmire(tabor, woochang)\nDoable(georgina)\nIdealistic(georgina)\nWhet(georgina, easton)\nWhet(georgina, tabor)\nAdmire(georgina, easton)\nforall x (Caddie(x, woochang) -> Caddie(x, tabor))\nforall x (Caddie(x, woochang) and Abomasal(woochang) -> Whet(woochang, georgina))\nCaddie(georgina, woochang) -> Whet(georgina, woochang)\nforall x (Whet(x, woochang) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Doable(x) -> Animate(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Doable(x) -> Caddie(x, woochang))\nforall x (Admire(x, woochang) -> Caddie(x, tabor))\nforall x (Admire(x, tabor) -> Whet(x, easton))\n\nnot Whet(georgina, easton)\n\ntherefore Whet(georgina, easton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The lisette is unsighted. The lisette reshoot the abbi. The lisette reshoot the carilyn. The lisette reshoot the odille. The abbi is unhurt. The abbi is criterial. The abbi overlay the lisette. The abbi assent the odille. The carilyn overlay the lisette. The carilyn overlay the odille. The carilyn assent the abbi. The odille is unsighted. The odille is criterial. The odille reshoot the lisette. The odille reshoot the carilyn. The odille assent the lisette. If someone overlay the abbi then they need the carilyn. If someone overlay the abbi and the abbi is fortissimo then the abbi reshoot the odille. If the odille overlay the abbi then the odille reshoot the abbi. If someone reshoot the abbi then they are fortissimo. Cold, unsighted people are charcoal. If someone is fortissimo and unsighted then they need the abbi. If someone assent the abbi then they need the carilyn. If someone assent the carilyn then they like the lisette. The carilyn overlay the carilyn.", "logic": "\nUnsighted(lisette)\nReshoot(lisette, abbi)\nReshoot(lisette, carilyn)\nReshoot(lisette, odille)\nUnhurt(abbi)\nCriterial(abbi)\nOverlay(abbi, lisette)\nAssent(abbi, odille)\nOverlay(carilyn, lisette)\nOverlay(carilyn, odille)\nAssent(carilyn, abbi)\nUnsighted(odille)\nCriterial(odille)\nReshoot(odille, lisette)\nReshoot(odille, carilyn)\nAssent(odille, lisette)\nforall x (Overlay(x, abbi) -> Overlay(x, carilyn))\nforall x (Overlay(x, abbi) and Fortissimo(abbi) -> Reshoot(abbi, odille))\nOverlay(odille, abbi) -> Reshoot(odille, abbi)\nforall x (Reshoot(x, abbi) -> Fortissimo(x))\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) and Unsighted(x) -> Charcoal(x))\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) and Unsighted(x) -> Overlay(x, abbi))\nforall x (Assent(x, abbi) -> Overlay(x, carilyn))\nforall x (Assent(x, carilyn) -> Reshoot(x, lisette))\n\nOverlay(carilyn, carilyn)\n\nAssent(carilyn, abbi) and forall x (Assent(x, abbi) -> Overlay(x, carilyn)) -> therefore Overlay(carilyn, carilyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The pieter is cuboid. The pieter lust the hedda. The pieter lust the kellina. The pieter lust the lonna. The hedda is informal. The hedda is unwearable. The hedda photostat the pieter. The hedda suffocate the lonna. The kellina photostat the pieter. The kellina photostat the lonna. The kellina suffocate the hedda. The lonna is cuboid. The lonna is unwearable. The lonna lust the pieter. The lonna lust the kellina. The lonna suffocate the pieter. If someone photostat the hedda then they need the kellina. If someone photostat the hedda and the hedda is plutonic then the hedda lust the lonna. If the lonna photostat the hedda then the lonna lust the hedda. If someone lust the hedda then they are plutonic. Cold, cuboid people are novel. If someone is plutonic and cuboid then they need the hedda. If someone suffocate the hedda then they need the kellina. If someone suffocate the kellina then they like the pieter. The kellina does not need the kellina.", "logic": "\nCuboid(pieter)\nLust(pieter, hedda)\nLust(pieter, kellina)\nLust(pieter, lonna)\nInformal(hedda)\nUnwearable(hedda)\nPhotostat(hedda, pieter)\nSuffocate(hedda, lonna)\nPhotostat(kellina, pieter)\nPhotostat(kellina, lonna)\nSuffocate(kellina, hedda)\nCuboid(lonna)\nUnwearable(lonna)\nLust(lonna, pieter)\nLust(lonna, kellina)\nSuffocate(lonna, pieter)\nforall x (Photostat(x, hedda) -> Photostat(x, kellina))\nforall x (Photostat(x, hedda) and Plutonic(hedda) -> Lust(hedda, lonna))\nPhotostat(lonna, hedda) -> Lust(lonna, hedda)\nforall x (Lust(x, hedda) -> Plutonic(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Cuboid(x) -> Novel(x))\nforall x (Plutonic(x) and Cuboid(x) -> Photostat(x, hedda))\nforall x (Suffocate(x, hedda) -> Photostat(x, kellina))\nforall x (Suffocate(x, kellina) -> Lust(x, pieter))\n\nnot Photostat(kellina, kellina)\n\nSuffocate(kellina, hedda) and forall x (Suffocate(x, hedda) -> Photostat(x, kellina)) -> therefore Photostat(kellina, kellina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The evelina is cured. The evelina virilise the tarrant. The evelina virilise the priscella. The evelina virilise the dody. The tarrant is unmoving. The tarrant is zygodactyl. The tarrant burden the evelina. The tarrant totalise the dody. The priscella burden the evelina. The priscella burden the dody. The priscella totalise the tarrant. The dody is cured. The dody is zygodactyl. The dody virilise the evelina. The dody virilise the priscella. The dody totalise the evelina. If someone burden the tarrant then they need the priscella. If someone burden the tarrant and the tarrant is unwieldy then the tarrant virilise the dody. If the dody burden the tarrant then the dody virilise the tarrant. If someone virilise the tarrant then they are unwieldy. Cold, cured people are apodeictic. If someone is unwieldy and cured then they need the tarrant. If someone totalise the tarrant then they need the priscella. If someone totalise the priscella then they like the evelina. The evelina is apodeictic.", "logic": "\nCured(evelina)\nVirilise(evelina, tarrant)\nVirilise(evelina, priscella)\nVirilise(evelina, dody)\nUnmoving(tarrant)\nZygodactyl(tarrant)\nBurden(tarrant, evelina)\nTotalise(tarrant, dody)\nBurden(priscella, evelina)\nBurden(priscella, dody)\nTotalise(priscella, tarrant)\nCured(dody)\nZygodactyl(dody)\nVirilise(dody, evelina)\nVirilise(dody, priscella)\nTotalise(dody, evelina)\nforall x (Burden(x, tarrant) -> Burden(x, priscella))\nforall x (Burden(x, tarrant) and Unwieldy(tarrant) -> Virilise(tarrant, dody))\nBurden(dody, tarrant) -> Virilise(dody, tarrant)\nforall x (Virilise(x, tarrant) -> Unwieldy(x))\nforall x (Unwieldy(x) and Cured(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Unwieldy(x) and Cured(x) -> Burden(x, tarrant))\nforall x (Totalise(x, tarrant) -> Burden(x, priscella))\nforall x (Totalise(x, priscella) -> Virilise(x, evelina))\n\nApodeictic(evelina)\n\nVirilise(evelina, tarrant) and forall x (Virilise(x, tarrant) -> Unwieldy(x)) -> therefore Unwieldy(evelina) Unwieldy(evelina) and Cured(evelina) and forall x (Unwieldy(x) and Cured(x) -> Apodeictic(x)) -> therefore Apodeictic(evelina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The graeme is clubbish. The graeme accrete the ginger. The graeme accrete the meridith. The graeme accrete the myrilla. The ginger is cerise. The ginger is alkaloidal. The ginger mishandle the graeme. The ginger camber the myrilla. The meridith mishandle the graeme. The meridith mishandle the myrilla. The meridith camber the ginger. The myrilla is clubbish. The myrilla is alkaloidal. The myrilla accrete the graeme. The myrilla accrete the meridith. The myrilla camber the graeme. If someone mishandle the ginger then they need the meridith. If someone mishandle the ginger and the ginger is premium then the ginger accrete the myrilla. If the myrilla mishandle the ginger then the myrilla accrete the ginger. If someone accrete the ginger then they are premium. Cold, clubbish people are untenable. If someone is premium and clubbish then they need the ginger. If someone camber the ginger then they need the meridith. If someone camber the meridith then they like the graeme. The graeme does not need the ginger.", "logic": "\nClubbish(graeme)\nAccrete(graeme, ginger)\nAccrete(graeme, meridith)\nAccrete(graeme, myrilla)\nCerise(ginger)\nAlkaloidal(ginger)\nMishandle(ginger, graeme)\nCamber(ginger, myrilla)\nMishandle(meridith, graeme)\nMishandle(meridith, myrilla)\nCamber(meridith, ginger)\nClubbish(myrilla)\nAlkaloidal(myrilla)\nAccrete(myrilla, graeme)\nAccrete(myrilla, meridith)\nCamber(myrilla, graeme)\nforall x (Mishandle(x, ginger) -> Mishandle(x, meridith))\nforall x (Mishandle(x, ginger) and Premium(ginger) -> Accrete(ginger, myrilla))\nMishandle(myrilla, ginger) -> Accrete(myrilla, ginger)\nforall x (Accrete(x, ginger) -> Premium(x))\nforall x (Premium(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Untenable(x))\nforall x (Premium(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Mishandle(x, ginger))\nforall x (Camber(x, ginger) -> Mishandle(x, meridith))\nforall x (Camber(x, meridith) -> Accrete(x, graeme))\n\nnot Mishandle(graeme, ginger)\n\nAccrete(graeme, ginger) and forall x (Accrete(x, ginger) -> Premium(x)) -> therefore Premium(graeme) Premium(graeme) and Clubbish(graeme) and forall x (Premium(x) and Clubbish(x) -> Mishandle(x, ginger)) -> therefore Mishandle(graeme, ginger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The davidde is unthankful. The davidde retrofit the corabel. The davidde retrofit the wood. The davidde retrofit the erhard. The corabel is noncyclic. The corabel is cesarean. The corabel examine the davidde. The corabel outnumber the erhard. The wood examine the davidde. The wood examine the erhard. The wood outnumber the corabel. The erhard is unthankful. The erhard is cesarean. The erhard retrofit the davidde. The erhard retrofit the wood. The erhard outnumber the davidde. If someone examine the corabel then they need the wood. If someone examine the corabel and the corabel is dogged then the corabel retrofit the erhard. If the erhard examine the corabel then the erhard retrofit the corabel. If someone retrofit the corabel then they are dogged. Cold, unthankful people are powered. If someone is dogged and unthankful then they need the corabel. If someone outnumber the corabel then they need the wood. If someone outnumber the wood then they like the davidde. The davidde examine the wood.", "logic": "\nUnthankful(davidde)\nRetrofit(davidde, corabel)\nRetrofit(davidde, wood)\nRetrofit(davidde, erhard)\nNoncyclic(corabel)\nCesarean(corabel)\nExamine(corabel, davidde)\nOutnumber(corabel, erhard)\nExamine(wood, davidde)\nExamine(wood, erhard)\nOutnumber(wood, corabel)\nUnthankful(erhard)\nCesarean(erhard)\nRetrofit(erhard, davidde)\nRetrofit(erhard, wood)\nOutnumber(erhard, davidde)\nforall x (Examine(x, corabel) -> Examine(x, wood))\nforall x (Examine(x, corabel) and Dogged(corabel) -> Retrofit(corabel, erhard))\nExamine(erhard, corabel) -> Retrofit(erhard, corabel)\nforall x (Retrofit(x, corabel) -> Dogged(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) and Unthankful(x) -> Powered(x))\nforall x (Dogged(x) and Unthankful(x) -> Examine(x, corabel))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, corabel) -> Examine(x, wood))\nforall x (Outnumber(x, wood) -> Retrofit(x, davidde))\n\nExamine(davidde, wood)\n\nRetrofit(davidde, corabel) and forall x (Retrofit(x, corabel) -> Dogged(x)) -> therefore Dogged(davidde) Dogged(davidde) and Unthankful(davidde) and forall x (Dogged(x) and Unthankful(x) -> Examine(x, corabel)) -> therefore Examine(davidde, corabel) Examine(davidde, corabel) and forall x (Examine(x, corabel) -> Examine(x, wood)) -> therefore Examine(davidde, wood)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The cherianne is pharaonic. The cherianne censor the maddalena. The cherianne censor the fayre. The cherianne censor the marcus. The maddalena is shamefaced. The maddalena is oozing. The maddalena undertake the cherianne. The maddalena reload the marcus. The fayre undertake the cherianne. The fayre undertake the marcus. The fayre reload the maddalena. The marcus is pharaonic. The marcus is oozing. The marcus censor the cherianne. The marcus censor the fayre. The marcus reload the cherianne. If someone undertake the maddalena then they need the fayre. If someone undertake the maddalena and the maddalena is dicey then the maddalena censor the marcus. If the marcus undertake the maddalena then the marcus censor the maddalena. If someone censor the maddalena then they are dicey. Cold, pharaonic people are narrowing. If someone is dicey and pharaonic then they need the maddalena. If someone reload the maddalena then they need the fayre. If someone reload the fayre then they like the cherianne. The cherianne does not need the fayre.", "logic": "\nPharaonic(cherianne)\nCensor(cherianne, maddalena)\nCensor(cherianne, fayre)\nCensor(cherianne, marcus)\nShamefaced(maddalena)\nOozing(maddalena)\nUndertake(maddalena, cherianne)\nReload(maddalena, marcus)\nUndertake(fayre, cherianne)\nUndertake(fayre, marcus)\nReload(fayre, maddalena)\nPharaonic(marcus)\nOozing(marcus)\nCensor(marcus, cherianne)\nCensor(marcus, fayre)\nReload(marcus, cherianne)\nforall x (Undertake(x, maddalena) -> Undertake(x, fayre))\nforall x (Undertake(x, maddalena) and Dicey(maddalena) -> Censor(maddalena, marcus))\nUndertake(marcus, maddalena) -> Censor(marcus, maddalena)\nforall x (Censor(x, maddalena) -> Dicey(x))\nforall x (Dicey(x) and Pharaonic(x) -> Narrowing(x))\nforall x (Dicey(x) and Pharaonic(x) -> Undertake(x, maddalena))\nforall x (Reload(x, maddalena) -> Undertake(x, fayre))\nforall x (Reload(x, fayre) -> Censor(x, cherianne))\n\nnot Undertake(cherianne, fayre)\n\nCensor(cherianne, maddalena) and forall x (Censor(x, maddalena) -> Dicey(x)) -> therefore Dicey(cherianne) Dicey(cherianne) and Pharaonic(cherianne) and forall x (Dicey(x) and Pharaonic(x) -> Undertake(x, maddalena)) -> therefore Undertake(cherianne, maddalena) Undertake(cherianne, maddalena) and forall x (Undertake(x, maddalena) -> Undertake(x, fayre)) -> therefore Undertake(cherianne, fayre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The jaime is errant. The jaime emanate the nealy. The jaime emanate the janice. The jaime emanate the hanson. The nealy is glossy. The nealy is tonsorial. The nealy commix the jaime. The nealy pool the hanson. The janice commix the jaime. The janice commix the hanson. The janice pool the nealy. The hanson is errant. The hanson is tonsorial. The hanson emanate the jaime. The hanson emanate the janice. The hanson pool the jaime. If someone commix the nealy then they need the janice. If someone commix the nealy and the nealy is ghastly then the nealy emanate the hanson. If the hanson commix the nealy then the hanson emanate the nealy. If someone emanate the nealy then they are ghastly. Cold, errant people are placed. If someone is ghastly and errant then they need the nealy. If someone pool the nealy then they need the janice. If someone pool the janice then they like the jaime. The nealy is not ghastly.", "logic": "\nErrant(jaime)\nEmanate(jaime, nealy)\nEmanate(jaime, janice)\nEmanate(jaime, hanson)\nGlossy(nealy)\nTonsorial(nealy)\nCommix(nealy, jaime)\nPool(nealy, hanson)\nCommix(janice, jaime)\nCommix(janice, hanson)\nPool(janice, nealy)\nErrant(hanson)\nTonsorial(hanson)\nEmanate(hanson, jaime)\nEmanate(hanson, janice)\nPool(hanson, jaime)\nforall x (Commix(x, nealy) -> Commix(x, janice))\nforall x (Commix(x, nealy) and Ghastly(nealy) -> Emanate(nealy, hanson))\nCommix(hanson, nealy) -> Emanate(hanson, nealy)\nforall x (Emanate(x, nealy) -> Ghastly(x))\nforall x (Ghastly(x) and Errant(x) -> Placed(x))\nforall x (Ghastly(x) and Errant(x) -> Commix(x, nealy))\nforall x (Pool(x, nealy) -> Commix(x, janice))\nforall x (Pool(x, janice) -> Emanate(x, jaime))\n\nnot Ghastly(nealy)\n\nforall x (Emanate(x, nealy) -> Ghastly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The rosario is mozambican. The rosario forego the elsy. The rosario forego the nata. The rosario forego the orsa. The elsy is radiating. The elsy is ametropic. The elsy breathe the rosario. The elsy normalise the orsa. The nata breathe the rosario. The nata breathe the orsa. The nata normalise the elsy. The orsa is mozambican. The orsa is ametropic. The orsa forego the rosario. The orsa forego the nata. The orsa normalise the rosario. If someone breathe the elsy then they need the nata. If someone breathe the elsy and the elsy is detailed then the elsy forego the orsa. If the orsa breathe the elsy then the orsa forego the elsy. If someone forego the elsy then they are detailed. Cold, mozambican people are stingless. If someone is detailed and mozambican then they need the elsy. If someone normalise the elsy then they need the nata. If someone normalise the nata then they like the rosario. The orsa breathe the nata.", "logic": "\nMozambican(rosario)\nForego(rosario, elsy)\nForego(rosario, nata)\nForego(rosario, orsa)\nRadiating(elsy)\nAmetropic(elsy)\nBreathe(elsy, rosario)\nNormalise(elsy, orsa)\nBreathe(nata, rosario)\nBreathe(nata, orsa)\nNormalise(nata, elsy)\nMozambican(orsa)\nAmetropic(orsa)\nForego(orsa, rosario)\nForego(orsa, nata)\nNormalise(orsa, rosario)\nforall x (Breathe(x, elsy) -> Breathe(x, nata))\nforall x (Breathe(x, elsy) and Detailed(elsy) -> Forego(elsy, orsa))\nBreathe(orsa, elsy) -> Forego(orsa, elsy)\nforall x (Forego(x, elsy) -> Detailed(x))\nforall x (Detailed(x) and Mozambican(x) -> Stingless(x))\nforall x (Detailed(x) and Mozambican(x) -> Breathe(x, elsy))\nforall x (Normalise(x, elsy) -> Breathe(x, nata))\nforall x (Normalise(x, nata) -> Forego(x, rosario))\n\nBreathe(orsa, nata)\n\nforall x (Breathe(x, elsy) -> Breathe(x, nata)) <- forall x (Detailed(x) and Mozambican(x) -> Breathe(x, elsy)) <- forall x (Forego(x, elsy) -> Detailed(x)) <- Breathe(orsa, elsy) -> Forego(orsa, elsy) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The kevin is ulterior. The kevin churn the veda. The kevin churn the donald. The kevin churn the putnam. The veda is flightless. The veda is sonorous. The veda undulate the kevin. The veda untangle the putnam. The donald undulate the kevin. The donald undulate the putnam. The donald untangle the veda. The putnam is ulterior. The putnam is sonorous. The putnam churn the kevin. The putnam churn the donald. The putnam untangle the kevin. If someone undulate the veda then they need the donald. If someone undulate the veda and the veda is dependent then the veda churn the putnam. If the putnam undulate the veda then the putnam churn the veda. If someone churn the veda then they are dependent. Cold, ulterior people are inelastic. If someone is dependent and ulterior then they need the veda. If someone untangle the veda then they need the donald. If someone untangle the donald then they like the kevin. The veda does not need the donald.", "logic": "\nUlterior(kevin)\nChurn(kevin, veda)\nChurn(kevin, donald)\nChurn(kevin, putnam)\nFlightless(veda)\nSonorous(veda)\nUndulate(veda, kevin)\nUntangle(veda, putnam)\nUndulate(donald, kevin)\nUndulate(donald, putnam)\nUntangle(donald, veda)\nUlterior(putnam)\nSonorous(putnam)\nChurn(putnam, kevin)\nChurn(putnam, donald)\nUntangle(putnam, kevin)\nforall x (Undulate(x, veda) -> Undulate(x, donald))\nforall x (Undulate(x, veda) and Dependent(veda) -> Churn(veda, putnam))\nUndulate(putnam, veda) -> Churn(putnam, veda)\nforall x (Churn(x, veda) -> Dependent(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) and Ulterior(x) -> Inelastic(x))\nforall x (Dependent(x) and Ulterior(x) -> Undulate(x, veda))\nforall x (Untangle(x, veda) -> Undulate(x, donald))\nforall x (Untangle(x, donald) -> Churn(x, kevin))\n\nnot Undulate(veda, donald)\n\nforall x (Undulate(x, veda) -> Undulate(x, donald)) <- forall x (Dependent(x) and Ulterior(x) -> Undulate(x, veda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The berke is glittery. The berke quaver the tobie. The berke quaver the quent. The berke quaver the hurley. The tobie is validating. The tobie is sapphire. The tobie pester the berke. The tobie macadamize the hurley. The quent pester the berke. The quent pester the hurley. The quent macadamize the tobie. The hurley is glittery. The hurley is sapphire. The hurley quaver the berke. The hurley quaver the quent. The hurley macadamize the berke. If someone pester the tobie then they need the quent. If someone pester the tobie and the tobie is acronymic then the tobie quaver the hurley. If the hurley pester the tobie then the hurley quaver the tobie. If someone quaver the tobie then they are acronymic. Cold, glittery people are dismal. If someone is acronymic and glittery then they need the tobie. If someone macadamize the tobie then they need the quent. If someone macadamize the quent then they like the berke. The tobie is dismal.", "logic": "\nGlittery(berke)\nQuaver(berke, tobie)\nQuaver(berke, quent)\nQuaver(berke, hurley)\nValidating(tobie)\nSapphire(tobie)\nPester(tobie, berke)\nMacadamize(tobie, hurley)\nPester(quent, berke)\nPester(quent, hurley)\nMacadamize(quent, tobie)\nGlittery(hurley)\nSapphire(hurley)\nQuaver(hurley, berke)\nQuaver(hurley, quent)\nMacadamize(hurley, berke)\nforall x (Pester(x, tobie) -> Pester(x, quent))\nforall x (Pester(x, tobie) and Acronymic(tobie) -> Quaver(tobie, hurley))\nPester(hurley, tobie) -> Quaver(hurley, tobie)\nforall x (Quaver(x, tobie) -> Acronymic(x))\nforall x (Acronymic(x) and Glittery(x) -> Dismal(x))\nforall x (Acronymic(x) and Glittery(x) -> Pester(x, tobie))\nforall x (Macadamize(x, tobie) -> Pester(x, quent))\nforall x (Macadamize(x, quent) -> Quaver(x, berke))\n\nDismal(tobie)\n\nforall x (Acronymic(x) and Glittery(x) -> Dismal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The sarah is pestering. The sarah unbrace the jed. The sarah unbrace the porter. The sarah unbrace the alston. The jed is philistine. The jed is vitrified. The jed sight the sarah. The jed wince the alston. The porter sight the sarah. The porter sight the alston. The porter wince the jed. The alston is pestering. The alston is vitrified. The alston unbrace the sarah. The alston unbrace the porter. The alston wince the sarah. If someone sight the jed then they need the porter. If someone sight the jed and the jed is dead then the jed unbrace the alston. If the alston sight the jed then the alston unbrace the jed. If someone unbrace the jed then they are dead. Cold, pestering people are strict. If someone is dead and pestering then they need the jed. If someone wince the jed then they need the porter. If someone wince the porter then they like the sarah. The jed is not pestering.", "logic": "\nPestering(sarah)\nUnbrace(sarah, jed)\nUnbrace(sarah, porter)\nUnbrace(sarah, alston)\nPhilistine(jed)\nVitrified(jed)\nSight(jed, sarah)\nWince(jed, alston)\nSight(porter, sarah)\nSight(porter, alston)\nWince(porter, jed)\nPestering(alston)\nVitrified(alston)\nUnbrace(alston, sarah)\nUnbrace(alston, porter)\nWince(alston, sarah)\nforall x (Sight(x, jed) -> Sight(x, porter))\nforall x (Sight(x, jed) and Dead(jed) -> Unbrace(jed, alston))\nSight(alston, jed) -> Unbrace(alston, jed)\nforall x (Unbrace(x, jed) -> Dead(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) and Pestering(x) -> Strict(x))\nforall x (Dead(x) and Pestering(x) -> Sight(x, jed))\nforall x (Wince(x, jed) -> Sight(x, porter))\nforall x (Wince(x, porter) -> Unbrace(x, sarah))\n\nnot Pestering(jed)\n\nnot Pestering(jed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The barbara is triennial. The barbara sniffle the elladine. The barbara sniffle the carlo. The barbara sniffle the ric. The elladine is whacky. The elladine is barreled. The elladine initiate the barbara. The elladine patinize the ric. The carlo initiate the barbara. The carlo initiate the ric. The carlo patinize the elladine. The ric is triennial. The ric is barreled. The ric sniffle the barbara. The ric sniffle the carlo. The ric patinize the barbara. If someone initiate the elladine then they need the carlo. If someone initiate the elladine and the elladine is clxv then the elladine sniffle the ric. If the ric initiate the elladine then the ric sniffle the elladine. If someone sniffle the elladine then they are clxv. Cold, triennial people are soused. If someone is clxv and triennial then they need the elladine. If someone patinize the elladine then they need the carlo. If someone patinize the carlo then they like the barbara. The elladine sniffle the carlo.", "logic": "\nTriennial(barbara)\nSniffle(barbara, elladine)\nSniffle(barbara, carlo)\nSniffle(barbara, ric)\nWhacky(elladine)\nBarreled(elladine)\nInitiate(elladine, barbara)\nPatinize(elladine, ric)\nInitiate(carlo, barbara)\nInitiate(carlo, ric)\nPatinize(carlo, elladine)\nTriennial(ric)\nBarreled(ric)\nSniffle(ric, barbara)\nSniffle(ric, carlo)\nPatinize(ric, barbara)\nforall x (Initiate(x, elladine) -> Initiate(x, carlo))\nforall x (Initiate(x, elladine) and Clxv(elladine) -> Sniffle(elladine, ric))\nInitiate(ric, elladine) -> Sniffle(ric, elladine)\nforall x (Sniffle(x, elladine) -> Clxv(x))\nforall x (Clxv(x) and Triennial(x) -> Soused(x))\nforall x (Clxv(x) and Triennial(x) -> Initiate(x, elladine))\nforall x (Patinize(x, elladine) -> Initiate(x, carlo))\nforall x (Patinize(x, carlo) -> Sniffle(x, barbara))\n\nSniffle(elladine, carlo)\n\nSniffle(elladine, carlo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The florian is arteriolar. The florian plastinate the olva. The florian plastinate the marlie. The florian plastinate the amberly. The olva is filial. The olva is undone. The olva sail the florian. The olva perjure the amberly. The marlie sail the florian. The marlie sail the amberly. The marlie perjure the olva. The amberly is arteriolar. The amberly is undone. The amberly plastinate the florian. The amberly plastinate the marlie. The amberly perjure the florian. If someone sail the olva then they need the marlie. If someone sail the olva and the olva is ecological then the olva plastinate the amberly. If the amberly sail the olva then the amberly plastinate the olva. If someone plastinate the olva then they are ecological. Cold, arteriolar people are charged. If someone is ecological and arteriolar then they need the olva. If someone perjure the olva then they need the marlie. If someone perjure the marlie then they like the florian. The marlie is not arteriolar.", "logic": "\nArteriolar(florian)\nPlastinate(florian, olva)\nPlastinate(florian, marlie)\nPlastinate(florian, amberly)\nFilial(olva)\nUndone(olva)\nSail(olva, florian)\nPerjure(olva, amberly)\nSail(marlie, florian)\nSail(marlie, amberly)\nPerjure(marlie, olva)\nArteriolar(amberly)\nUndone(amberly)\nPlastinate(amberly, florian)\nPlastinate(amberly, marlie)\nPerjure(amberly, florian)\nforall x (Sail(x, olva) -> Sail(x, marlie))\nforall x (Sail(x, olva) and Ecological(olva) -> Plastinate(olva, amberly))\nSail(amberly, olva) -> Plastinate(amberly, olva)\nforall x (Plastinate(x, olva) -> Ecological(x))\nforall x (Ecological(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Charged(x))\nforall x (Ecological(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Sail(x, olva))\nforall x (Perjure(x, olva) -> Sail(x, marlie))\nforall x (Perjure(x, marlie) -> Plastinate(x, florian))\n\nnot Arteriolar(marlie)\n\nnot Arteriolar(marlie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "The zandra is zenithal. The zandra unmuzzle the mariele. The zandra unmuzzle the alyson. The zandra unmuzzle the patty. The mariele is eurafrican. The mariele is reprobate. The mariele saint the zandra. The mariele glint the patty. The alyson saint the zandra. The alyson saint the patty. The alyson glint the mariele. The patty is zenithal. The patty is reprobate. The patty unmuzzle the zandra. The patty unmuzzle the alyson. The patty glint the zandra. If someone saint the mariele then they need the alyson. If someone saint the mariele and the mariele is unabridged then the mariele unmuzzle the patty. If the patty saint the mariele then the patty unmuzzle the mariele. If someone unmuzzle the mariele then they are unabridged. Cold, zenithal people are synthetic. If someone is unabridged and zenithal then they need the mariele. If someone glint the mariele then they need the alyson. If someone glint the alyson then they like the zandra. The patty saint the zandra.", "logic": "\nZenithal(zandra)\nUnmuzzle(zandra, mariele)\nUnmuzzle(zandra, alyson)\nUnmuzzle(zandra, patty)\nEurafrican(mariele)\nReprobate(mariele)\nSaint(mariele, zandra)\nGlint(mariele, patty)\nSaint(alyson, zandra)\nSaint(alyson, patty)\nGlint(alyson, mariele)\nZenithal(patty)\nReprobate(patty)\nUnmuzzle(patty, zandra)\nUnmuzzle(patty, alyson)\nGlint(patty, zandra)\nforall x (Saint(x, mariele) -> Saint(x, alyson))\nforall x (Saint(x, mariele) and Unabridged(mariele) -> Unmuzzle(mariele, patty))\nSaint(patty, mariele) -> Unmuzzle(patty, mariele)\nforall x (Unmuzzle(x, mariele) -> Unabridged(x))\nforall x (Unabridged(x) and Zenithal(x) -> Synthetic(x))\nforall x (Unabridged(x) and Zenithal(x) -> Saint(x, mariele))\nforall x (Glint(x, mariele) -> Saint(x, alyson))\nforall x (Glint(x, alyson) -> Unmuzzle(x, zandra))\n\nSaint(patty, zandra)\n\nSaint(patty, zandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1309"} {"premises": "Herculie is delayed. If Herculie is delayed then Herculie is trepid. Quiet, delayed things are ballistic. If something is unalert and incan then it is purposeful. If something is unalert and not ballistic then it is purposeful. Red, ballistic things are horrid. If something is delayed and not trepid then it is horrid. Herculie is delayed.", "logic": "\nDelayed(herculie)\nDelayed(herculie) -> Trepid(herculie)\nforall x (Trepid(x) and Delayed(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) and Incan(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) and not Ballistic(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Unalert(x) and Ballistic(x) -> Horrid(x))\nforall x (Delayed(x) and not Trepid(x) -> Horrid(x))\n\nDelayed(herculie)\n\ntherefore Delayed(herculie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Onida is opening. If Onida is opening then Onida is thornless. Quiet, opening things are haematal. If something is inimical and macho then it is tilted. If something is inimical and not haematal then it is tilted. Red, haematal things are dogging. If something is opening and not thornless then it is dogging. Onida is not opening.", "logic": "\nOpening(onida)\nOpening(onida) -> Thornless(onida)\nforall x (Thornless(x) and Opening(x) -> Haematal(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Macho(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and not Haematal(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Inimical(x) and Haematal(x) -> Dogging(x))\nforall x (Opening(x) and not Thornless(x) -> Dogging(x))\n\nnot Opening(onida)\n\ntherefore Opening(onida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Joleen is unworkable. If Joleen is unworkable then Joleen is bicolour. Quiet, unworkable things are edentulate. If something is sequent and prior then it is gaunt. If something is sequent and not edentulate then it is gaunt. Red, edentulate things are workable. If something is unworkable and not bicolour then it is workable. Joleen is bicolour.", "logic": "\nUnworkable(joleen)\nUnworkable(joleen) -> Bicolour(joleen)\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and Unworkable(x) -> Edentulate(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Prior(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and not Edentulate(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Edentulate(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Unworkable(x) and not Bicolour(x) -> Workable(x))\n\nBicolour(joleen)\n\nUnworkable(joleen) and Unworkable(joleen) -> Bicolour(joleen) -> therefore Bicolour(joleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Durward is seventeen. If Durward is seventeen then Durward is grassy. Quiet, seventeen things are libidinous. If something is clawlike and attended then it is recurvate. If something is clawlike and not libidinous then it is recurvate. Red, libidinous things are hardbound. If something is seventeen and not grassy then it is hardbound. Durward is not grassy.", "logic": "\nSeventeen(durward)\nSeventeen(durward) -> Grassy(durward)\nforall x (Grassy(x) and Seventeen(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and Attended(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and not Libidinous(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nforall x (Clawlike(x) and Libidinous(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and not Grassy(x) -> Hardbound(x))\n\nnot Grassy(durward)\n\nSeventeen(durward) and Seventeen(durward) -> Grassy(durward) -> therefore Grassy(durward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Steven is worried. If Steven is worried then Steven is bedraggled. Quiet, worried things are ferrous. If something is vaccinated and spiraling then it is antlered. If something is vaccinated and not ferrous then it is antlered. Red, ferrous things are lanate. If something is worried and not bedraggled then it is lanate. Steven is ferrous.", "logic": "\nWorried(steven)\nWorried(steven) -> Bedraggled(steven)\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Worried(x) -> Ferrous(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Spiraling(x) -> Antlered(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and not Ferrous(x) -> Antlered(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Lanate(x))\nforall x (Worried(x) and not Bedraggled(x) -> Lanate(x))\n\nFerrous(steven)\n\nWorried(steven) and Worried(steven) -> Bedraggled(steven) -> therefore Bedraggled(steven) Bedraggled(steven) and Worried(steven) and forall x (Bedraggled(x) and Worried(x) -> Ferrous(x)) -> therefore Ferrous(steven)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Donella is unsighted. If Donella is unsighted then Donella is cityfied. Quiet, unsighted things are nibbed. If something is undreamed and congestive then it is algal. If something is undreamed and not nibbed then it is algal. Red, nibbed things are lost. If something is unsighted and not cityfied then it is lost. Donella is not nibbed.", "logic": "\nUnsighted(donella)\nUnsighted(donella) -> Cityfied(donella)\nforall x (Cityfied(x) and Unsighted(x) -> Nibbed(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) and Congestive(x) -> Algal(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) and not Nibbed(x) -> Algal(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) and Nibbed(x) -> Lost(x))\nforall x (Unsighted(x) and not Cityfied(x) -> Lost(x))\n\nnot Nibbed(donella)\n\nUnsighted(donella) and Unsighted(donella) -> Cityfied(donella) -> therefore Cityfied(donella) Cityfied(donella) and Unsighted(donella) and forall x (Cityfied(x) and Unsighted(x) -> Nibbed(x)) -> therefore Nibbed(donella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Crawford is ebracteate. If Crawford is ebracteate then Crawford is afraid. Quiet, ebracteate things are sulfuric. If something is toed and monodic then it is unlocated. If something is toed and not sulfuric then it is unlocated. Red, sulfuric things are vague. If something is ebracteate and not afraid then it is vague. Crawford is not vague.", "logic": "\nEbracteate(crawford)\nEbracteate(crawford) -> Afraid(crawford)\nforall x (Afraid(x) and Ebracteate(x) -> Sulfuric(x))\nforall x (Toed(x) and Monodic(x) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Toed(x) and not Sulfuric(x) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Toed(x) and Sulfuric(x) -> Vague(x))\nforall x (Ebracteate(x) and not Afraid(x) -> Vague(x))\n\nnot Vague(crawford)\n\nforall x (Toed(x) and Sulfuric(x) -> Vague(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Phaedra is reverse. If Phaedra is reverse then Phaedra is littoral. Quiet, reverse things are first. If something is uncommon and greater then it is wigless. If something is uncommon and not first then it is wigless. Red, first things are awny. If something is reverse and not littoral then it is awny. Phaedra is wigless.", "logic": "\nReverse(phaedra)\nReverse(phaedra) -> Littoral(phaedra)\nforall x (Littoral(x) and Reverse(x) -> First(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and Greater(x) -> Wigless(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and not First(x) -> Wigless(x))\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and First(x) -> Awny(x))\nforall x (Reverse(x) and not Littoral(x) -> Awny(x))\n\nWigless(phaedra)\n\nforall x (Uncommon(x) and Greater(x) -> Wigless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Margo is revertible. If Margo is revertible then Margo is undesigned. Quiet, revertible things are umbellate. If something is unsuited and impassable then it is decided. If something is unsuited and not umbellate then it is decided. Red, umbellate things are buxom. If something is revertible and not undesigned then it is buxom. Margo is not impassable.", "logic": "\nRevertible(margo)\nRevertible(margo) -> Undesigned(margo)\nforall x (Undesigned(x) and Revertible(x) -> Umbellate(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Impassable(x) -> Decided(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and not Umbellate(x) -> Decided(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and Umbellate(x) -> Buxom(x))\nforall x (Revertible(x) and not Undesigned(x) -> Buxom(x))\n\nnot Impassable(margo)\n\nnot Impassable(margo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "Rubina is uninitiate. If Rubina is uninitiate then Rubina is proofed. Quiet, uninitiate things are fourpenny. If something is apteral and perennial then it is unaltered. If something is apteral and not fourpenny then it is unaltered. Red, fourpenny things are befuddled. If something is uninitiate and not proofed then it is befuddled. Rubina is apteral.", "logic": "\nUninitiate(rubina)\nUninitiate(rubina) -> Proofed(rubina)\nforall x (Proofed(x) and Uninitiate(x) -> Fourpenny(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) and Perennial(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) and not Fourpenny(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nforall x (Apteral(x) and Fourpenny(x) -> Befuddled(x))\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) and not Proofed(x) -> Befuddled(x))\n\nApteral(rubina)\n\nApteral(rubina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-215"} {"premises": "The riva scrounge the garland. The riva scrounge the meaghan. The riva is yellowish. The riva enroll the garland. The garland scrounge the riva. The garland is yellowish. The garland is logical. The garland is inshore. The garland eternize the riva. The garland eternize the meaghan. The garland enroll the meaghan. The meaghan scrounge the riva. The meaghan scrounge the garland. The meaghan is inshore. The meaghan eternize the riva. The meaghan eternize the garland. If someone scrounge the riva and they are inshore then they see the riva. If the meaghan is inshore and the meaghan scrounge the riva then the riva scrounge the meaghan. The meaghan scrounge the riva.", "logic": "\nScrounge(riva, garland)\nScrounge(riva, meaghan)\nYellowish(riva)\nEnroll(riva, garland)\nScrounge(garland, riva)\nYellowish(garland)\nLogical(garland)\nInshore(garland)\nEternize(garland, riva)\nEternize(garland, meaghan)\nEnroll(garland, meaghan)\nScrounge(meaghan, riva)\nScrounge(meaghan, garland)\nInshore(meaghan)\nEternize(meaghan, riva)\nEternize(meaghan, garland)\nforall x (Scrounge(x, riva) and Inshore(x) -> Enroll(x, riva))\nInshore(meaghan) and Scrounge(meaghan, riva) -> Scrounge(riva, meaghan)\n\nScrounge(meaghan, riva)\n\ntherefore Scrounge(meaghan, riva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3114"} {"premises": "The barris foist the lib. The barris foist the donnie. The barris is vigilant. The barris pollard the lib. The lib foist the barris. The lib is vigilant. The lib is decumbent. The lib is shameful. The lib demonise the barris. The lib demonise the donnie. The lib pollard the donnie. The donnie foist the barris. The donnie foist the lib. The donnie is shameful. The donnie demonise the barris. The donnie demonise the lib. If someone foist the barris and they are shameful then they see the barris. If the donnie is shameful and the donnie foist the barris then the barris foist the donnie. The barris does not eat the donnie.", "logic": "\nFoist(barris, lib)\nFoist(barris, donnie)\nVigilant(barris)\nPollard(barris, lib)\nFoist(lib, barris)\nVigilant(lib)\nDecumbent(lib)\nShameful(lib)\nDemonise(lib, barris)\nDemonise(lib, donnie)\nPollard(lib, donnie)\nFoist(donnie, barris)\nFoist(donnie, lib)\nShameful(donnie)\nDemonise(donnie, barris)\nDemonise(donnie, lib)\nforall x (Foist(x, barris) and Shameful(x) -> Pollard(x, barris))\nShameful(donnie) and Foist(donnie, barris) -> Foist(barris, donnie)\n\nnot Foist(barris, donnie)\n\ntherefore Foist(barris, donnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3114"} {"premises": "The halie bloody the urson. The halie bloody the carlita. The halie is moblike. The halie keel the urson. The urson bloody the halie. The urson is moblike. The urson is treasured. The urson is startled. The urson paddle the halie. The urson paddle the carlita. The urson keel the carlita. The carlita bloody the halie. The carlita bloody the urson. The carlita is startled. The carlita paddle the halie. The carlita paddle the urson. If someone bloody the halie and they are startled then they see the halie. If the carlita is startled and the carlita bloody the halie then the halie bloody the carlita. The halie does not see the halie.", "logic": "\nBloody(halie, urson)\nBloody(halie, carlita)\nMoblike(halie)\nKeel(halie, urson)\nBloody(urson, halie)\nMoblike(urson)\nTreasured(urson)\nStartled(urson)\nPaddle(urson, halie)\nPaddle(urson, carlita)\nKeel(urson, carlita)\nBloody(carlita, halie)\nBloody(carlita, urson)\nStartled(carlita)\nPaddle(carlita, halie)\nPaddle(carlita, urson)\nforall x (Bloody(x, halie) and Startled(x) -> Keel(x, halie))\nStartled(carlita) and Bloody(carlita, halie) -> Bloody(halie, carlita)\n\nnot Keel(halie, halie)\n\nforall x (Bloody(x, halie) and Startled(x) -> Keel(x, halie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3114"} {"premises": "The clarissa demur the perry. The clarissa demur the janie. The clarissa is doltish. The clarissa baste the perry. The perry demur the clarissa. The perry is doltish. The perry is postexilic. The perry is synovial. The perry wreck the clarissa. The perry wreck the janie. The perry baste the janie. The janie demur the clarissa. The janie demur the perry. The janie is synovial. The janie wreck the clarissa. The janie wreck the perry. If someone demur the clarissa and they are synovial then they see the clarissa. If the janie is synovial and the janie demur the clarissa then the clarissa demur the janie. The clarissa wreck the clarissa.", "logic": "\nDemur(clarissa, perry)\nDemur(clarissa, janie)\nDoltish(clarissa)\nBaste(clarissa, perry)\nDemur(perry, clarissa)\nDoltish(perry)\nPostexilic(perry)\nSynovial(perry)\nWreck(perry, clarissa)\nWreck(perry, janie)\nBaste(perry, janie)\nDemur(janie, clarissa)\nDemur(janie, perry)\nSynovial(janie)\nWreck(janie, clarissa)\nWreck(janie, perry)\nforall x (Demur(x, clarissa) and Synovial(x) -> Baste(x, clarissa))\nSynovial(janie) and Demur(janie, clarissa) -> Demur(clarissa, janie)\n\nWreck(clarissa, clarissa)\n\nWreck(clarissa, clarissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3114"} {"premises": "Delbert is parvenue. Rosalinda is stocked. Eden is stocked. If someone is azygos then they are rental. Rosalinda is stocked.", "logic": "\nParvenue(delbert)\nStocked(rosalinda)\nStocked(eden)\nforall x (Azygos(x) -> Rental(x))\n\nStocked(rosalinda)\n\ntherefore Stocked(rosalinda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2848"} {"premises": "Katlin is diverting. Ezekiel is allogeneic. Noam is allogeneic. If someone is expansive then they are alpestrine. Ezekiel is not allogeneic.", "logic": "\nDiverting(katlin)\nAllogeneic(ezekiel)\nAllogeneic(noam)\nforall x (Expansive(x) -> Alpestrine(x))\n\nnot Allogeneic(ezekiel)\n\ntherefore Allogeneic(ezekiel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2848"} {"premises": "Pincus is beninese. Giralda is blighted. Minta is blighted. If someone is chivalrous then they are asteriated. Giralda is not asteriated.", "logic": "\nBeninese(pincus)\nBlighted(giralda)\nBlighted(minta)\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) -> Asteriated(x))\n\nnot Asteriated(giralda)\n\nforall x (Chivalrous(x) -> Asteriated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2848"} {"premises": "Leoine is caffeinic. Neron is unsoured. Fortune is unsoured. If someone is causative then they are diacritic. Neron is cold.", "logic": "\nCaffeinic(leoine)\nUnsoured(neron)\nUnsoured(fortune)\nforall x (Causative(x) -> Diacritic(x))\n\nCold(neron)\n\nCold(neron) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2848"} {"premises": "The gershom converge the michell. The gershom converge the chuck. The gershom is roomy. The gershom is unsyllabic. The gershom is landscaped. The gershom promenade the michell. The gershom hook the chuck. The michell converge the chuck. The michell is underdone. The michell is normal. The michell promenade the gershom. The michell hook the gershom. The michell hook the chuck. The chuck converge the gershom. The chuck is underdone. The chuck promenade the gershom. If the gershom converge the chuck then the chuck hook the gershom. If someone promenade the gershom then they are roomy. If someone hook the gershom then they see the chuck. If someone is unsyllabic then they like the gershom. If someone hook the gershom and they like the chuck then they are unsyllabic. If someone promenade the gershom and the gershom hook the michell then the michell promenade the gershom. If someone converge the gershom and they see the gershom then they like the chuck. If someone is landscaped and they see the chuck then the chuck promenade the michell. The michell is underdone.", "logic": "\nConverge(gershom, michell)\nConverge(gershom, chuck)\nRoomy(gershom)\nUnsyllabic(gershom)\nLandscaped(gershom)\nPromenade(gershom, michell)\nHook(gershom, chuck)\nConverge(michell, chuck)\nUnderdone(michell)\nNormal(michell)\nPromenade(michell, gershom)\nHook(michell, gershom)\nHook(michell, chuck)\nConverge(chuck, gershom)\nUnderdone(chuck)\nPromenade(chuck, gershom)\nConverge(gershom, chuck) -> Hook(chuck, gershom)\nforall x (Promenade(x, gershom) -> Roomy(x))\nforall x (Hook(x, gershom) -> Hook(x, chuck))\nforall x (Unsyllabic(x) -> Promenade(x, gershom))\nforall x (Hook(x, gershom) and Promenade(x, chuck) -> Unsyllabic(x))\nforall x (Promenade(x, gershom) and Hook(gershom, michell) -> Promenade(michell, gershom))\nforall x (Converge(x, gershom) and Hook(x, gershom) -> Promenade(x, chuck))\nforall x (Landscaped(x) and Hook(x, chuck) -> Promenade(chuck, michell))\n\nUnderdone(michell)\n\ntherefore Underdone(michell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The hirsch despatch the regine. The hirsch despatch the vittoria. The hirsch is topped. The hirsch is bismuthal. The hirsch is brimfull. The hirsch clerk the regine. The hirsch sour the vittoria. The regine despatch the vittoria. The regine is repressed. The regine is costly. The regine clerk the hirsch. The regine sour the hirsch. The regine sour the vittoria. The vittoria despatch the hirsch. The vittoria is repressed. The vittoria clerk the hirsch. If the hirsch despatch the vittoria then the vittoria sour the hirsch. If someone clerk the hirsch then they are topped. If someone sour the hirsch then they see the vittoria. If someone is bismuthal then they like the hirsch. If someone sour the hirsch and they like the vittoria then they are bismuthal. If someone clerk the hirsch and the hirsch sour the regine then the regine clerk the hirsch. If someone despatch the hirsch and they see the hirsch then they like the vittoria. If someone is brimfull and they see the vittoria then the vittoria clerk the regine. The hirsch does not chase the vittoria.", "logic": "\nDespatch(hirsch, regine)\nDespatch(hirsch, vittoria)\nTopped(hirsch)\nBismuthal(hirsch)\nBrimfull(hirsch)\nClerk(hirsch, regine)\nSour(hirsch, vittoria)\nDespatch(regine, vittoria)\nRepressed(regine)\nCostly(regine)\nClerk(regine, hirsch)\nSour(regine, hirsch)\nSour(regine, vittoria)\nDespatch(vittoria, hirsch)\nRepressed(vittoria)\nClerk(vittoria, hirsch)\nDespatch(hirsch, vittoria) -> Sour(vittoria, hirsch)\nforall x (Clerk(x, hirsch) -> Topped(x))\nforall x (Sour(x, hirsch) -> Sour(x, vittoria))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) -> Clerk(x, hirsch))\nforall x (Sour(x, hirsch) and Clerk(x, vittoria) -> Bismuthal(x))\nforall x (Clerk(x, hirsch) and Sour(hirsch, regine) -> Clerk(regine, hirsch))\nforall x (Despatch(x, hirsch) and Sour(x, hirsch) -> Clerk(x, vittoria))\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Sour(x, vittoria) -> Clerk(vittoria, regine))\n\nnot Despatch(hirsch, vittoria)\n\ntherefore Despatch(hirsch, vittoria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The vanda hydrate the suzie. The vanda hydrate the ariana. The vanda is putrid. The vanda is toxicant. The vanda is unintended. The vanda deprave the suzie. The vanda whittle the ariana. The suzie hydrate the ariana. The suzie is laboured. The suzie is delusional. The suzie deprave the vanda. The suzie whittle the vanda. The suzie whittle the ariana. The ariana hydrate the vanda. The ariana is laboured. The ariana deprave the vanda. If the vanda hydrate the ariana then the ariana whittle the vanda. If someone deprave the vanda then they are putrid. If someone whittle the vanda then they see the ariana. If someone is toxicant then they like the vanda. If someone whittle the vanda and they like the ariana then they are toxicant. If someone deprave the vanda and the vanda whittle the suzie then the suzie deprave the vanda. If someone hydrate the vanda and they see the vanda then they like the ariana. If someone is unintended and they see the ariana then the ariana deprave the suzie. The ariana deprave the suzie.", "logic": "\nHydrate(vanda, suzie)\nHydrate(vanda, ariana)\nPutrid(vanda)\nToxicant(vanda)\nUnintended(vanda)\nDeprave(vanda, suzie)\nWhittle(vanda, ariana)\nHydrate(suzie, ariana)\nLaboured(suzie)\nDelusional(suzie)\nDeprave(suzie, vanda)\nWhittle(suzie, vanda)\nWhittle(suzie, ariana)\nHydrate(ariana, vanda)\nLaboured(ariana)\nDeprave(ariana, vanda)\nHydrate(vanda, ariana) -> Whittle(ariana, vanda)\nforall x (Deprave(x, vanda) -> Putrid(x))\nforall x (Whittle(x, vanda) -> Whittle(x, ariana))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) -> Deprave(x, vanda))\nforall x (Whittle(x, vanda) and Deprave(x, ariana) -> Toxicant(x))\nforall x (Deprave(x, vanda) and Whittle(vanda, suzie) -> Deprave(suzie, vanda))\nforall x (Hydrate(x, vanda) and Whittle(x, vanda) -> Deprave(x, ariana))\nforall x (Unintended(x) and Whittle(x, ariana) -> Deprave(ariana, suzie))\n\nDeprave(ariana, suzie)\n\nUnintended(vanda) and Whittle(vanda, ariana) and forall x (Unintended(x) and Whittle(x, ariana) -> Deprave(ariana, suzie)) -> therefore Deprave(ariana, suzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The trevor fish the frederich. The trevor fish the byram. The trevor is septal. The trevor is coolheaded. The trevor is dextrorsal. The trevor handbuild the frederich. The trevor etch the byram. The frederich fish the byram. The frederich is equatorial. The frederich is dowdy. The frederich handbuild the trevor. The frederich etch the trevor. The frederich etch the byram. The byram fish the trevor. The byram is equatorial. The byram handbuild the trevor. If the trevor fish the byram then the byram etch the trevor. If someone handbuild the trevor then they are septal. If someone etch the trevor then they see the byram. If someone is coolheaded then they like the trevor. If someone etch the trevor and they like the byram then they are coolheaded. If someone handbuild the trevor and the trevor etch the frederich then the frederich handbuild the trevor. If someone fish the trevor and they see the trevor then they like the byram. If someone is dextrorsal and they see the byram then the byram handbuild the frederich. The trevor does not like the trevor.", "logic": "\nFish(trevor, frederich)\nFish(trevor, byram)\nSeptal(trevor)\nCoolheaded(trevor)\nDextrorsal(trevor)\nHandbuild(trevor, frederich)\nEtch(trevor, byram)\nFish(frederich, byram)\nEquatorial(frederich)\nDowdy(frederich)\nHandbuild(frederich, trevor)\nEtch(frederich, trevor)\nEtch(frederich, byram)\nFish(byram, trevor)\nEquatorial(byram)\nHandbuild(byram, trevor)\nFish(trevor, byram) -> Etch(byram, trevor)\nforall x (Handbuild(x, trevor) -> Septal(x))\nforall x (Etch(x, trevor) -> Etch(x, byram))\nforall x (Coolheaded(x) -> Handbuild(x, trevor))\nforall x (Etch(x, trevor) and Handbuild(x, byram) -> Coolheaded(x))\nforall x (Handbuild(x, trevor) and Etch(trevor, frederich) -> Handbuild(frederich, trevor))\nforall x (Fish(x, trevor) and Etch(x, trevor) -> Handbuild(x, byram))\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) and Etch(x, byram) -> Handbuild(byram, frederich))\n\nnot Handbuild(trevor, trevor)\n\nCoolheaded(trevor) and forall x (Coolheaded(x) -> Handbuild(x, trevor)) -> therefore Handbuild(trevor, trevor)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The nevin ruggedise the julian. The nevin ruggedise the west. The nevin is ambulacral. The nevin is obsolete. The nevin is bladed. The nevin gear the julian. The nevin homogenize the west. The julian ruggedise the west. The julian is smooth. The julian is bizonal. The julian gear the nevin. The julian homogenize the nevin. The julian homogenize the west. The west ruggedise the nevin. The west is smooth. The west gear the nevin. If the nevin ruggedise the west then the west homogenize the nevin. If someone gear the nevin then they are ambulacral. If someone homogenize the nevin then they see the west. If someone is obsolete then they like the nevin. If someone homogenize the nevin and they like the west then they are obsolete. If someone gear the nevin and the nevin homogenize the julian then the julian gear the nevin. If someone ruggedise the nevin and they see the nevin then they like the west. If someone is bladed and they see the west then the west gear the julian. The west homogenize the west.", "logic": "\nRuggedise(nevin, julian)\nRuggedise(nevin, west)\nAmbulacral(nevin)\nObsolete(nevin)\nBladed(nevin)\nGear(nevin, julian)\nHomogenize(nevin, west)\nRuggedise(julian, west)\nSmooth(julian)\nBizonal(julian)\nGear(julian, nevin)\nHomogenize(julian, nevin)\nHomogenize(julian, west)\nRuggedise(west, nevin)\nSmooth(west)\nGear(west, nevin)\nRuggedise(nevin, west) -> Homogenize(west, nevin)\nforall x (Gear(x, nevin) -> Ambulacral(x))\nforall x (Homogenize(x, nevin) -> Homogenize(x, west))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) -> Gear(x, nevin))\nforall x (Homogenize(x, nevin) and Gear(x, west) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Gear(x, nevin) and Homogenize(nevin, julian) -> Gear(julian, nevin))\nforall x (Ruggedise(x, nevin) and Homogenize(x, nevin) -> Gear(x, west))\nforall x (Bladed(x) and Homogenize(x, west) -> Gear(west, julian))\n\nHomogenize(west, west)\n\nRuggedise(nevin, west) and Ruggedise(nevin, west) -> Homogenize(west, nevin) -> therefore Homogenize(west, nevin) Homogenize(west, nevin) and forall x (Homogenize(x, nevin) -> Homogenize(x, west)) -> therefore Homogenize(west, west)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The sandro shimmer the elva. The sandro shimmer the janot. The sandro is lustreless. The sandro is motional. The sandro is sustained. The sandro renege the elva. The sandro squish the janot. The elva shimmer the janot. The elva is unranked. The elva is sheetlike. The elva renege the sandro. The elva squish the sandro. The elva squish the janot. The janot shimmer the sandro. The janot is unranked. The janot renege the sandro. If the sandro shimmer the janot then the janot squish the sandro. If someone renege the sandro then they are lustreless. If someone squish the sandro then they see the janot. If someone is motional then they like the sandro. If someone squish the sandro and they like the janot then they are motional. If someone renege the sandro and the sandro squish the elva then the elva renege the sandro. If someone shimmer the sandro and they see the sandro then they like the janot. If someone is sustained and they see the janot then the janot renege the elva. The janot does not see the janot.", "logic": "\nShimmer(sandro, elva)\nShimmer(sandro, janot)\nLustreless(sandro)\nMotional(sandro)\nSustained(sandro)\nRenege(sandro, elva)\nSquish(sandro, janot)\nShimmer(elva, janot)\nUnranked(elva)\nSheetlike(elva)\nRenege(elva, sandro)\nSquish(elva, sandro)\nSquish(elva, janot)\nShimmer(janot, sandro)\nUnranked(janot)\nRenege(janot, sandro)\nShimmer(sandro, janot) -> Squish(janot, sandro)\nforall x (Renege(x, sandro) -> Lustreless(x))\nforall x (Squish(x, sandro) -> Squish(x, janot))\nforall x (Motional(x) -> Renege(x, sandro))\nforall x (Squish(x, sandro) and Renege(x, janot) -> Motional(x))\nforall x (Renege(x, sandro) and Squish(sandro, elva) -> Renege(elva, sandro))\nforall x (Shimmer(x, sandro) and Squish(x, sandro) -> Renege(x, janot))\nforall x (Sustained(x) and Squish(x, janot) -> Renege(janot, elva))\n\nnot Squish(janot, janot)\n\nShimmer(sandro, janot) and Shimmer(sandro, janot) -> Squish(janot, sandro) -> therefore Squish(janot, sandro) Squish(janot, sandro) and forall x (Squish(x, sandro) -> Squish(x, janot)) -> therefore Squish(janot, janot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The shauna miscreate the ulric. The shauna miscreate the maurine. The shauna is miasmic. The shauna is furthest. The shauna is south. The shauna fatten the ulric. The shauna saunter the maurine. The ulric miscreate the maurine. The ulric is dextrous. The ulric is useful. The ulric fatten the shauna. The ulric saunter the shauna. The ulric saunter the maurine. The maurine miscreate the shauna. The maurine is dextrous. The maurine fatten the shauna. If the shauna miscreate the maurine then the maurine saunter the shauna. If someone fatten the shauna then they are miasmic. If someone saunter the shauna then they see the maurine. If someone is furthest then they like the shauna. If someone saunter the shauna and they like the maurine then they are furthest. If someone fatten the shauna and the shauna saunter the ulric then the ulric fatten the shauna. If someone miscreate the shauna and they see the shauna then they like the maurine. If someone is south and they see the maurine then the maurine fatten the ulric. The maurine is furthest.", "logic": "\nMiscreate(shauna, ulric)\nMiscreate(shauna, maurine)\nMiasmic(shauna)\nFurthest(shauna)\nSouth(shauna)\nFatten(shauna, ulric)\nSaunter(shauna, maurine)\nMiscreate(ulric, maurine)\nDextrous(ulric)\nUseful(ulric)\nFatten(ulric, shauna)\nSaunter(ulric, shauna)\nSaunter(ulric, maurine)\nMiscreate(maurine, shauna)\nDextrous(maurine)\nFatten(maurine, shauna)\nMiscreate(shauna, maurine) -> Saunter(maurine, shauna)\nforall x (Fatten(x, shauna) -> Miasmic(x))\nforall x (Saunter(x, shauna) -> Saunter(x, maurine))\nforall x (Furthest(x) -> Fatten(x, shauna))\nforall x (Saunter(x, shauna) and Fatten(x, maurine) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Fatten(x, shauna) and Saunter(shauna, ulric) -> Fatten(ulric, shauna))\nforall x (Miscreate(x, shauna) and Saunter(x, shauna) -> Fatten(x, maurine))\nforall x (South(x) and Saunter(x, maurine) -> Fatten(maurine, ulric))\n\nFurthest(maurine)\n\nMiscreate(shauna, maurine) and Miscreate(shauna, maurine) -> Saunter(maurine, shauna) -> therefore Saunter(maurine, shauna) Miscreate(shauna, maurine) and Miscreate(shauna, maurine) -> Saunter(maurine, shauna) -> therefore Saunter(maurine, shauna) Miscreate(maurine, shauna) and Saunter(maurine, shauna) and forall x (Miscreate(x, shauna) and Saunter(x, shauna) -> Fatten(x, maurine)) -> therefore Fatten(maurine, maurine) Saunter(maurine, shauna) and Fatten(maurine, maurine) and forall x (Saunter(x, shauna) and Fatten(x, maurine) -> Furthest(x)) -> therefore Furthest(maurine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The ailene coil the luther. The ailene coil the wilfred. The ailene is haematal. The ailene is demode. The ailene is dormy. The ailene foray the luther. The ailene heliograph the wilfred. The luther coil the wilfred. The luther is boughless. The luther is tibetan. The luther foray the ailene. The luther heliograph the ailene. The luther heliograph the wilfred. The wilfred coil the ailene. The wilfred is boughless. The wilfred foray the ailene. If the ailene coil the wilfred then the wilfred heliograph the ailene. If someone foray the ailene then they are haematal. If someone heliograph the ailene then they see the wilfred. If someone is demode then they like the ailene. If someone heliograph the ailene and they like the wilfred then they are demode. If someone foray the ailene and the ailene heliograph the luther then the luther foray the ailene. If someone coil the ailene and they see the ailene then they like the wilfred. If someone is dormy and they see the wilfred then the wilfred foray the luther. The wilfred is not demode.", "logic": "\nCoil(ailene, luther)\nCoil(ailene, wilfred)\nHaematal(ailene)\nDemode(ailene)\nDormy(ailene)\nForay(ailene, luther)\nHeliograph(ailene, wilfred)\nCoil(luther, wilfred)\nBoughless(luther)\nTibetan(luther)\nForay(luther, ailene)\nHeliograph(luther, ailene)\nHeliograph(luther, wilfred)\nCoil(wilfred, ailene)\nBoughless(wilfred)\nForay(wilfred, ailene)\nCoil(ailene, wilfred) -> Heliograph(wilfred, ailene)\nforall x (Foray(x, ailene) -> Haematal(x))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, ailene) -> Heliograph(x, wilfred))\nforall x (Demode(x) -> Foray(x, ailene))\nforall x (Heliograph(x, ailene) and Foray(x, wilfred) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Foray(x, ailene) and Heliograph(ailene, luther) -> Foray(luther, ailene))\nforall x (Coil(x, ailene) and Heliograph(x, ailene) -> Foray(x, wilfred))\nforall x (Dormy(x) and Heliograph(x, wilfred) -> Foray(wilfred, luther))\n\nnot Demode(wilfred)\n\nCoil(ailene, wilfred) and Coil(ailene, wilfred) -> Heliograph(wilfred, ailene) -> therefore Heliograph(wilfred, ailene) Coil(ailene, wilfred) and Coil(ailene, wilfred) -> Heliograph(wilfred, ailene) -> therefore Heliograph(wilfred, ailene) Coil(wilfred, ailene) and Heliograph(wilfred, ailene) and forall x (Coil(x, ailene) and Heliograph(x, ailene) -> Foray(x, wilfred)) -> therefore Foray(wilfred, wilfred) Heliograph(wilfred, ailene) and Foray(wilfred, wilfred) and forall x (Heliograph(x, ailene) and Foray(x, wilfred) -> Demode(x)) -> therefore Demode(wilfred)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The robena happen the mohammad. The robena happen the bryce. The robena is capitate. The robena is unplaced. The robena is monophonic. The robena miscarry the mohammad. The robena bouse the bryce. The mohammad happen the bryce. The mohammad is prehensile. The mohammad is envious. The mohammad miscarry the robena. The mohammad bouse the robena. The mohammad bouse the bryce. The bryce happen the robena. The bryce is prehensile. The bryce miscarry the robena. If the robena happen the bryce then the bryce bouse the robena. If someone miscarry the robena then they are capitate. If someone bouse the robena then they see the bryce. If someone is unplaced then they like the robena. If someone bouse the robena and they like the bryce then they are unplaced. If someone miscarry the robena and the robena bouse the mohammad then the mohammad miscarry the robena. If someone happen the robena and they see the robena then they like the bryce. If someone is monophonic and they see the bryce then the bryce miscarry the mohammad. The robena does not like the bryce.", "logic": "\nHappen(robena, mohammad)\nHappen(robena, bryce)\nCapitate(robena)\nUnplaced(robena)\nMonophonic(robena)\nMiscarry(robena, mohammad)\nBouse(robena, bryce)\nHappen(mohammad, bryce)\nPrehensile(mohammad)\nEnvious(mohammad)\nMiscarry(mohammad, robena)\nBouse(mohammad, robena)\nBouse(mohammad, bryce)\nHappen(bryce, robena)\nPrehensile(bryce)\nMiscarry(bryce, robena)\nHappen(robena, bryce) -> Bouse(bryce, robena)\nforall x (Miscarry(x, robena) -> Capitate(x))\nforall x (Bouse(x, robena) -> Bouse(x, bryce))\nforall x (Unplaced(x) -> Miscarry(x, robena))\nforall x (Bouse(x, robena) and Miscarry(x, bryce) -> Unplaced(x))\nforall x (Miscarry(x, robena) and Bouse(robena, mohammad) -> Miscarry(mohammad, robena))\nforall x (Happen(x, robena) and Bouse(x, robena) -> Miscarry(x, bryce))\nforall x (Monophonic(x) and Bouse(x, bryce) -> Miscarry(bryce, mohammad))\n\nnot Miscarry(robena, bryce)\n\nforall x (Happen(x, robena) and Bouse(x, robena) -> Miscarry(x, bryce)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The hunter obtrude the darleen. The hunter obtrude the tory. The hunter is unbounded. The hunter is fibreoptic. The hunter is opalescent. The hunter sweat the darleen. The hunter twinkle the tory. The darleen obtrude the tory. The darleen is zigzag. The darleen is stunted. The darleen sweat the hunter. The darleen twinkle the hunter. The darleen twinkle the tory. The tory obtrude the hunter. The tory is zigzag. The tory sweat the hunter. If the hunter obtrude the tory then the tory twinkle the hunter. If someone sweat the hunter then they are unbounded. If someone twinkle the hunter then they see the tory. If someone is fibreoptic then they like the hunter. If someone twinkle the hunter and they like the tory then they are fibreoptic. If someone sweat the hunter and the hunter twinkle the darleen then the darleen sweat the hunter. If someone obtrude the hunter and they see the hunter then they like the tory. If someone is opalescent and they see the tory then the tory sweat the darleen. The darleen sweat the tory.", "logic": "\nObtrude(hunter, darleen)\nObtrude(hunter, tory)\nUnbounded(hunter)\nFibreoptic(hunter)\nOpalescent(hunter)\nSweat(hunter, darleen)\nTwinkle(hunter, tory)\nObtrude(darleen, tory)\nZigzag(darleen)\nStunted(darleen)\nSweat(darleen, hunter)\nTwinkle(darleen, hunter)\nTwinkle(darleen, tory)\nObtrude(tory, hunter)\nZigzag(tory)\nSweat(tory, hunter)\nObtrude(hunter, tory) -> Twinkle(tory, hunter)\nforall x (Sweat(x, hunter) -> Unbounded(x))\nforall x (Twinkle(x, hunter) -> Twinkle(x, tory))\nforall x (Fibreoptic(x) -> Sweat(x, hunter))\nforall x (Twinkle(x, hunter) and Sweat(x, tory) -> Fibreoptic(x))\nforall x (Sweat(x, hunter) and Twinkle(hunter, darleen) -> Sweat(darleen, hunter))\nforall x (Obtrude(x, hunter) and Twinkle(x, hunter) -> Sweat(x, tory))\nforall x (Opalescent(x) and Twinkle(x, tory) -> Sweat(tory, darleen))\n\nSweat(darleen, tory)\n\nforall x (Obtrude(x, hunter) and Twinkle(x, hunter) -> Sweat(x, tory)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The nestor shelter the inci. The nestor shelter the guenna. The nestor is gratified. The nestor is shattering. The nestor is continual. The nestor pinion the inci. The nestor abound the guenna. The inci shelter the guenna. The inci is climactic. The inci is touchable. The inci pinion the nestor. The inci abound the nestor. The inci abound the guenna. The guenna shelter the nestor. The guenna is climactic. The guenna pinion the nestor. If the nestor shelter the guenna then the guenna abound the nestor. If someone pinion the nestor then they are gratified. If someone abound the nestor then they see the guenna. If someone is shattering then they like the nestor. If someone abound the nestor and they like the guenna then they are shattering. If someone pinion the nestor and the nestor abound the inci then the inci pinion the nestor. If someone shelter the nestor and they see the nestor then they like the guenna. If someone is continual and they see the guenna then the guenna pinion the inci. The inci is not shattering.", "logic": "\nShelter(nestor, inci)\nShelter(nestor, guenna)\nGratified(nestor)\nShattering(nestor)\nContinual(nestor)\nPinion(nestor, inci)\nAbound(nestor, guenna)\nShelter(inci, guenna)\nClimactic(inci)\nTouchable(inci)\nPinion(inci, nestor)\nAbound(inci, nestor)\nAbound(inci, guenna)\nShelter(guenna, nestor)\nClimactic(guenna)\nPinion(guenna, nestor)\nShelter(nestor, guenna) -> Abound(guenna, nestor)\nforall x (Pinion(x, nestor) -> Gratified(x))\nforall x (Abound(x, nestor) -> Abound(x, guenna))\nforall x (Shattering(x) -> Pinion(x, nestor))\nforall x (Abound(x, nestor) and Pinion(x, guenna) -> Shattering(x))\nforall x (Pinion(x, nestor) and Abound(nestor, inci) -> Pinion(inci, nestor))\nforall x (Shelter(x, nestor) and Abound(x, nestor) -> Pinion(x, guenna))\nforall x (Continual(x) and Abound(x, guenna) -> Pinion(guenna, inci))\n\nnot Shattering(inci)\n\nforall x (Abound(x, nestor) and Pinion(x, guenna) -> Shattering(x)) <- forall x (Shelter(x, nestor) and Abound(x, nestor) -> Pinion(x, guenna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The lyndell limit the ozzy. The lyndell limit the aryn. The lyndell is xcvii. The lyndell is stockinged. The lyndell is suspicious. The lyndell chasse the ozzy. The lyndell waste the aryn. The ozzy limit the aryn. The ozzy is neurotic. The ozzy is arborical. The ozzy chasse the lyndell. The ozzy waste the lyndell. The ozzy waste the aryn. The aryn limit the lyndell. The aryn is neurotic. The aryn chasse the lyndell. If the lyndell limit the aryn then the aryn waste the lyndell. If someone chasse the lyndell then they are xcvii. If someone waste the lyndell then they see the aryn. If someone is stockinged then they like the lyndell. If someone waste the lyndell and they like the aryn then they are stockinged. If someone chasse the lyndell and the lyndell waste the ozzy then the ozzy chasse the lyndell. If someone limit the lyndell and they see the lyndell then they like the aryn. If someone is suspicious and they see the aryn then the aryn chasse the ozzy. The ozzy is suspicious.", "logic": "\nLimit(lyndell, ozzy)\nLimit(lyndell, aryn)\nXcvii(lyndell)\nStockinged(lyndell)\nSuspicious(lyndell)\nChasse(lyndell, ozzy)\nWaste(lyndell, aryn)\nLimit(ozzy, aryn)\nNeurotic(ozzy)\nArborical(ozzy)\nChasse(ozzy, lyndell)\nWaste(ozzy, lyndell)\nWaste(ozzy, aryn)\nLimit(aryn, lyndell)\nNeurotic(aryn)\nChasse(aryn, lyndell)\nLimit(lyndell, aryn) -> Waste(aryn, lyndell)\nforall x (Chasse(x, lyndell) -> Xcvii(x))\nforall x (Waste(x, lyndell) -> Waste(x, aryn))\nforall x (Stockinged(x) -> Chasse(x, lyndell))\nforall x (Waste(x, lyndell) and Chasse(x, aryn) -> Stockinged(x))\nforall x (Chasse(x, lyndell) and Waste(lyndell, ozzy) -> Chasse(ozzy, lyndell))\nforall x (Limit(x, lyndell) and Waste(x, lyndell) -> Chasse(x, aryn))\nforall x (Suspicious(x) and Waste(x, aryn) -> Chasse(aryn, ozzy))\n\nSuspicious(ozzy)\n\nSuspicious(ozzy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The nikkie nosedive the noah. The nikkie nosedive the ellwood. The nikkie is fulsome. The nikkie is matted. The nikkie is metabolic. The nikkie deflect the noah. The nikkie train the ellwood. The noah nosedive the ellwood. The noah is rheumatoid. The noah is tenebrific. The noah deflect the nikkie. The noah train the nikkie. The noah train the ellwood. The ellwood nosedive the nikkie. The ellwood is rheumatoid. The ellwood deflect the nikkie. If the nikkie nosedive the ellwood then the ellwood train the nikkie. If someone deflect the nikkie then they are fulsome. If someone train the nikkie then they see the ellwood. If someone is matted then they like the nikkie. If someone train the nikkie and they like the ellwood then they are matted. If someone deflect the nikkie and the nikkie train the noah then the noah deflect the nikkie. If someone nosedive the nikkie and they see the nikkie then they like the ellwood. If someone is metabolic and they see the ellwood then the ellwood deflect the noah. The ellwood is not metabolic.", "logic": "\nNosedive(nikkie, noah)\nNosedive(nikkie, ellwood)\nFulsome(nikkie)\nMatted(nikkie)\nMetabolic(nikkie)\nDeflect(nikkie, noah)\nTrain(nikkie, ellwood)\nNosedive(noah, ellwood)\nRheumatoid(noah)\nTenebrific(noah)\nDeflect(noah, nikkie)\nTrain(noah, nikkie)\nTrain(noah, ellwood)\nNosedive(ellwood, nikkie)\nRheumatoid(ellwood)\nDeflect(ellwood, nikkie)\nNosedive(nikkie, ellwood) -> Train(ellwood, nikkie)\nforall x (Deflect(x, nikkie) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Train(x, nikkie) -> Train(x, ellwood))\nforall x (Matted(x) -> Deflect(x, nikkie))\nforall x (Train(x, nikkie) and Deflect(x, ellwood) -> Matted(x))\nforall x (Deflect(x, nikkie) and Train(nikkie, noah) -> Deflect(noah, nikkie))\nforall x (Nosedive(x, nikkie) and Train(x, nikkie) -> Deflect(x, ellwood))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Train(x, ellwood) -> Deflect(ellwood, noah))\n\nnot Metabolic(ellwood)\n\nnot Metabolic(ellwood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The annabelle indenture the humbert. The annabelle indenture the lyn. The annabelle is shinto. The annabelle is outboard. The annabelle is gallant. The annabelle urbanise the humbert. The annabelle gull the lyn. The humbert indenture the lyn. The humbert is center. The humbert is barren. The humbert urbanise the annabelle. The humbert gull the annabelle. The humbert gull the lyn. The lyn indenture the annabelle. The lyn is center. The lyn urbanise the annabelle. If the annabelle indenture the lyn then the lyn gull the annabelle. If someone urbanise the annabelle then they are shinto. If someone gull the annabelle then they see the lyn. If someone is outboard then they like the annabelle. If someone gull the annabelle and they like the lyn then they are outboard. If someone urbanise the annabelle and the annabelle gull the humbert then the humbert urbanise the annabelle. If someone indenture the annabelle and they see the annabelle then they like the lyn. If someone is gallant and they see the lyn then the lyn urbanise the humbert. The lyn indenture the humbert.", "logic": "\nIndenture(annabelle, humbert)\nIndenture(annabelle, lyn)\nShinto(annabelle)\nOutboard(annabelle)\nGallant(annabelle)\nUrbanise(annabelle, humbert)\nGull(annabelle, lyn)\nIndenture(humbert, lyn)\nCenter(humbert)\nBarren(humbert)\nUrbanise(humbert, annabelle)\nGull(humbert, annabelle)\nGull(humbert, lyn)\nIndenture(lyn, annabelle)\nCenter(lyn)\nUrbanise(lyn, annabelle)\nIndenture(annabelle, lyn) -> Gull(lyn, annabelle)\nforall x (Urbanise(x, annabelle) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Gull(x, annabelle) -> Gull(x, lyn))\nforall x (Outboard(x) -> Urbanise(x, annabelle))\nforall x (Gull(x, annabelle) and Urbanise(x, lyn) -> Outboard(x))\nforall x (Urbanise(x, annabelle) and Gull(annabelle, humbert) -> Urbanise(humbert, annabelle))\nforall x (Indenture(x, annabelle) and Gull(x, annabelle) -> Urbanise(x, lyn))\nforall x (Gallant(x) and Gull(x, lyn) -> Urbanise(lyn, humbert))\n\nIndenture(lyn, humbert)\n\nIndenture(lyn, humbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The jonah enrobe the kylie. The jonah enrobe the charmaine. The jonah is loth. The jonah is inhabited. The jonah is deadpan. The jonah write the kylie. The jonah jail the charmaine. The kylie enrobe the charmaine. The kylie is sandaled. The kylie is inducive. The kylie write the jonah. The kylie jail the jonah. The kylie jail the charmaine. The charmaine enrobe the jonah. The charmaine is sandaled. The charmaine write the jonah. If the jonah enrobe the charmaine then the charmaine jail the jonah. If someone write the jonah then they are loth. If someone jail the jonah then they see the charmaine. If someone is inhabited then they like the jonah. If someone jail the jonah and they like the charmaine then they are inhabited. If someone write the jonah and the jonah jail the kylie then the kylie write the jonah. If someone enrobe the jonah and they see the jonah then they like the charmaine. If someone is deadpan and they see the charmaine then the charmaine write the kylie. The kylie does not like the kylie.", "logic": "\nEnrobe(jonah, kylie)\nEnrobe(jonah, charmaine)\nLoth(jonah)\nInhabited(jonah)\nDeadpan(jonah)\nWrite(jonah, kylie)\nJail(jonah, charmaine)\nEnrobe(kylie, charmaine)\nSandaled(kylie)\nInducive(kylie)\nWrite(kylie, jonah)\nJail(kylie, jonah)\nJail(kylie, charmaine)\nEnrobe(charmaine, jonah)\nSandaled(charmaine)\nWrite(charmaine, jonah)\nEnrobe(jonah, charmaine) -> Jail(charmaine, jonah)\nforall x (Write(x, jonah) -> Loth(x))\nforall x (Jail(x, jonah) -> Jail(x, charmaine))\nforall x (Inhabited(x) -> Write(x, jonah))\nforall x (Jail(x, jonah) and Write(x, charmaine) -> Inhabited(x))\nforall x (Write(x, jonah) and Jail(jonah, kylie) -> Write(kylie, jonah))\nforall x (Enrobe(x, jonah) and Jail(x, jonah) -> Write(x, charmaine))\nforall x (Deadpan(x) and Jail(x, charmaine) -> Write(charmaine, kylie))\n\nnot Write(kylie, kylie)\n\nnot Write(kylie, kylie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "The carlton bait the wynne. The carlton bait the ilse. The carlton is graduate. The carlton is enchained. The carlton is luckless. The carlton boil the wynne. The carlton class the ilse. The wynne bait the ilse. The wynne is spiked. The wynne is horrifying. The wynne boil the carlton. The wynne class the carlton. The wynne class the ilse. The ilse bait the carlton. The ilse is spiked. The ilse boil the carlton. If the carlton bait the ilse then the ilse class the carlton. If someone boil the carlton then they are graduate. If someone class the carlton then they see the ilse. If someone is enchained then they like the carlton. If someone class the carlton and they like the ilse then they are enchained. If someone boil the carlton and the carlton class the wynne then the wynne boil the carlton. If someone bait the carlton and they see the carlton then they like the ilse. If someone is luckless and they see the ilse then the ilse boil the wynne. The carlton class the wynne.", "logic": "\nBait(carlton, wynne)\nBait(carlton, ilse)\nGraduate(carlton)\nEnchained(carlton)\nLuckless(carlton)\nBoil(carlton, wynne)\nClass(carlton, ilse)\nBait(wynne, ilse)\nSpiked(wynne)\nHorrifying(wynne)\nBoil(wynne, carlton)\nClass(wynne, carlton)\nClass(wynne, ilse)\nBait(ilse, carlton)\nSpiked(ilse)\nBoil(ilse, carlton)\nBait(carlton, ilse) -> Class(ilse, carlton)\nforall x (Boil(x, carlton) -> Graduate(x))\nforall x (Class(x, carlton) -> Class(x, ilse))\nforall x (Enchained(x) -> Boil(x, carlton))\nforall x (Class(x, carlton) and Boil(x, ilse) -> Enchained(x))\nforall x (Boil(x, carlton) and Class(carlton, wynne) -> Boil(wynne, carlton))\nforall x (Bait(x, carlton) and Class(x, carlton) -> Boil(x, ilse))\nforall x (Luckless(x) and Class(x, ilse) -> Boil(ilse, wynne))\n\nClass(carlton, wynne)\n\nClass(carlton, wynne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-941"} {"premises": "Tandi is arrhythmic. Nert is rotund. Nert is arrhythmic. Nert is katabolic. Nert is xxiv. Kourtney is katabolic. Kourtney is xxiv. If Tandi is xxiv and Tandi is rotund then Tandi is innate. All katabolic, arrhythmic people are alien. All arrhythmic people are ample. All ample people are katabolic. If Kourtney is xxiv then Kourtney is alien. All katabolic, rotund people are arrhythmic. Nert is xxiv.", "logic": "\nArrhythmic(tandi)\nRotund(nert)\nArrhythmic(nert)\nKatabolic(nert)\nXxiv(nert)\nKatabolic(kourtney)\nXxiv(kourtney)\nXxiv(tandi) and Rotund(tandi) -> Innate(tandi)\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and Arrhythmic(x) -> Alien(x))\nforall x (Arrhythmic(x) -> Ample(x))\nforall x (Ample(x) -> Katabolic(x))\nXxiv(kourtney) -> Alien(kourtney)\nforall x (Katabolic(x) and Rotund(x) -> Arrhythmic(x))\n\nXxiv(nert)\n\ntherefore Xxiv(nert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Zarla is bombastic. Moise is synoptic. Moise is bombastic. Moise is syrian. Moise is vehement. Barbey is syrian. Barbey is vehement. If Zarla is vehement and Zarla is synoptic then Zarla is endermatic. All syrian, bombastic people are inevitable. All bombastic people are eldritch. All eldritch people are syrian. If Barbey is vehement then Barbey is inevitable. All syrian, synoptic people are bombastic. Moise is not vehement.", "logic": "\nBombastic(zarla)\nSynoptic(moise)\nBombastic(moise)\nSyrian(moise)\nVehement(moise)\nSyrian(barbey)\nVehement(barbey)\nVehement(zarla) and Synoptic(zarla) -> Endermatic(zarla)\nforall x (Syrian(x) and Bombastic(x) -> Inevitable(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Eldritch(x))\nforall x (Eldritch(x) -> Syrian(x))\nVehement(barbey) -> Inevitable(barbey)\nforall x (Syrian(x) and Synoptic(x) -> Bombastic(x))\n\nnot Vehement(moise)\n\ntherefore Vehement(moise)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Dagmar is unthought. Andrey is systematic. Andrey is unthought. Andrey is akin. Andrey is corrected. Leanna is akin. Leanna is corrected. If Dagmar is corrected and Dagmar is systematic then Dagmar is divorced. All akin, unthought people are amazed. All unthought people are aboveboard. All aboveboard people are akin. If Leanna is corrected then Leanna is amazed. All akin, systematic people are unthought. Andrey is aboveboard.", "logic": "\nUnthought(dagmar)\nSystematic(andrey)\nUnthought(andrey)\nAkin(andrey)\nCorrected(andrey)\nAkin(leanna)\nCorrected(leanna)\nCorrected(dagmar) and Systematic(dagmar) -> Divorced(dagmar)\nforall x (Akin(x) and Unthought(x) -> Amazed(x))\nforall x (Unthought(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Akin(x))\nCorrected(leanna) -> Amazed(leanna)\nforall x (Akin(x) and Systematic(x) -> Unthought(x))\n\nAboveboard(andrey)\n\nUnthought(andrey) and forall x (Unthought(x) -> Aboveboard(x)) -> therefore Aboveboard(andrey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Madison is wobbly. Celestyna is unfastened. Celestyna is wobbly. Celestyna is agitative. Celestyna is sinuous. Natalina is agitative. Natalina is sinuous. If Madison is sinuous and Madison is unfastened then Madison is heterodyne. All agitative, wobbly people are gradable. All wobbly people are willing. All willing people are agitative. If Natalina is sinuous then Natalina is gradable. All agitative, unfastened people are wobbly. Natalina is not gradable.", "logic": "\nWobbly(madison)\nUnfastened(celestyna)\nWobbly(celestyna)\nAgitative(celestyna)\nSinuous(celestyna)\nAgitative(natalina)\nSinuous(natalina)\nSinuous(madison) and Unfastened(madison) -> Heterodyne(madison)\nforall x (Agitative(x) and Wobbly(x) -> Gradable(x))\nforall x (Wobbly(x) -> Willing(x))\nforall x (Willing(x) -> Agitative(x))\nSinuous(natalina) -> Gradable(natalina)\nforall x (Agitative(x) and Unfastened(x) -> Wobbly(x))\n\nnot Gradable(natalina)\n\nSinuous(natalina) and Sinuous(natalina) -> Gradable(natalina) -> therefore Gradable(natalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Pascal is fattening. Alyse is assailable. Alyse is fattening. Alyse is overarm. Alyse is legato. Izzi is overarm. Izzi is legato. If Pascal is legato and Pascal is assailable then Pascal is netted. All overarm, fattening people are blistering. All fattening people are monthlong. All monthlong people are overarm. If Izzi is legato then Izzi is blistering. All overarm, assailable people are fattening. Pascal is overarm.", "logic": "\nFattening(pascal)\nAssailable(alyse)\nFattening(alyse)\nOverarm(alyse)\nLegato(alyse)\nOverarm(izzi)\nLegato(izzi)\nLegato(pascal) and Assailable(pascal) -> Netted(pascal)\nforall x (Overarm(x) and Fattening(x) -> Blistering(x))\nforall x (Fattening(x) -> Monthlong(x))\nforall x (Monthlong(x) -> Overarm(x))\nLegato(izzi) -> Blistering(izzi)\nforall x (Overarm(x) and Assailable(x) -> Fattening(x))\n\nOverarm(pascal)\n\nFattening(pascal) and forall x (Fattening(x) -> Monthlong(x)) -> therefore Monthlong(pascal) Monthlong(pascal) and forall x (Monthlong(x) -> Overarm(x)) -> therefore Overarm(pascal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Johanna is thrilled. Martica is scalloped. Martica is thrilled. Martica is diarrheic. Martica is conversant. Murielle is diarrheic. Murielle is conversant. If Johanna is conversant and Johanna is scalloped then Johanna is weird. All diarrheic, thrilled people are endermic. All thrilled people are flinty. All flinty people are diarrheic. If Murielle is conversant then Murielle is endermic. All diarrheic, scalloped people are thrilled. Johanna is not diarrheic.", "logic": "\nThrilled(johanna)\nScalloped(martica)\nThrilled(martica)\nDiarrheic(martica)\nConversant(martica)\nDiarrheic(murielle)\nConversant(murielle)\nConversant(johanna) and Scalloped(johanna) -> Weird(johanna)\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Thrilled(x) -> Endermic(x))\nforall x (Thrilled(x) -> Flinty(x))\nforall x (Flinty(x) -> Diarrheic(x))\nConversant(murielle) -> Endermic(murielle)\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Scalloped(x) -> Thrilled(x))\n\nnot Diarrheic(johanna)\n\nThrilled(johanna) and forall x (Thrilled(x) -> Flinty(x)) -> therefore Flinty(johanna) Flinty(johanna) and forall x (Flinty(x) -> Diarrheic(x)) -> therefore Diarrheic(johanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Ferdy is sticking. Krishna is mealy. Krishna is sticking. Krishna is governable. Krishna is foursquare. Natale is governable. Natale is foursquare. If Ferdy is foursquare and Ferdy is mealy then Ferdy is jesuit. All governable, sticking people are laciniate. All sticking people are funky. All funky people are governable. If Natale is foursquare then Natale is laciniate. All governable, mealy people are sticking. Ferdy is laciniate.", "logic": "\nSticking(ferdy)\nMealy(krishna)\nSticking(krishna)\nGovernable(krishna)\nFoursquare(krishna)\nGovernable(natale)\nFoursquare(natale)\nFoursquare(ferdy) and Mealy(ferdy) -> Jesuit(ferdy)\nforall x (Governable(x) and Sticking(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Sticking(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Funky(x) -> Governable(x))\nFoursquare(natale) -> Laciniate(natale)\nforall x (Governable(x) and Mealy(x) -> Sticking(x))\n\nLaciniate(ferdy)\n\nSticking(ferdy) and forall x (Sticking(x) -> Funky(x)) -> therefore Funky(ferdy) Funky(ferdy) and forall x (Funky(x) -> Governable(x)) -> therefore Governable(ferdy) Governable(ferdy) and Sticking(ferdy) and forall x (Governable(x) and Sticking(x) -> Laciniate(x)) -> therefore Laciniate(ferdy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Fonzie is inhuman. Patrica is offbeat. Patrica is inhuman. Patrica is eminent. Patrica is humongous. Phedra is eminent. Phedra is humongous. If Fonzie is humongous and Fonzie is offbeat then Fonzie is reversed. All eminent, inhuman people are thin. All inhuman people are stocky. All stocky people are eminent. If Phedra is humongous then Phedra is thin. All eminent, offbeat people are inhuman. Fonzie is not thin.", "logic": "\nInhuman(fonzie)\nOffbeat(patrica)\nInhuman(patrica)\nEminent(patrica)\nHumongous(patrica)\nEminent(phedra)\nHumongous(phedra)\nHumongous(fonzie) and Offbeat(fonzie) -> Reversed(fonzie)\nforall x (Eminent(x) and Inhuman(x) -> Thin(x))\nforall x (Inhuman(x) -> Stocky(x))\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> Eminent(x))\nHumongous(phedra) -> Thin(phedra)\nforall x (Eminent(x) and Offbeat(x) -> Inhuman(x))\n\nnot Thin(fonzie)\n\nInhuman(fonzie) and forall x (Inhuman(x) -> Stocky(x)) -> therefore Stocky(fonzie) Stocky(fonzie) and forall x (Stocky(x) -> Eminent(x)) -> therefore Eminent(fonzie) Eminent(fonzie) and Inhuman(fonzie) and forall x (Eminent(x) and Inhuman(x) -> Thin(x)) -> therefore Thin(fonzie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Karole is exothermal. Nelly is sealed. Nelly is exothermal. Nelly is vigilant. Nelly is higher. Johanna is vigilant. Johanna is higher. If Karole is higher and Karole is sealed then Karole is tidal. All vigilant, exothermal people are bleary. All exothermal people are childlike. All childlike people are vigilant. If Johanna is higher then Johanna is bleary. All vigilant, sealed people are exothermal. Johanna is not exothermal.", "logic": "\nExothermal(karole)\nSealed(nelly)\nExothermal(nelly)\nVigilant(nelly)\nHigher(nelly)\nVigilant(johanna)\nHigher(johanna)\nHigher(karole) and Sealed(karole) -> Tidal(karole)\nforall x (Vigilant(x) and Exothermal(x) -> Bleary(x))\nforall x (Exothermal(x) -> Childlike(x))\nforall x (Childlike(x) -> Vigilant(x))\nHigher(johanna) -> Bleary(johanna)\nforall x (Vigilant(x) and Sealed(x) -> Exothermal(x))\n\nnot Exothermal(johanna)\n\nforall x (Vigilant(x) and Sealed(x) -> Exothermal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Rianon is rising. Mina is violable. Mina is rising. Mina is saxicolous. Mina is forfeit. Heidi is saxicolous. Heidi is forfeit. If Rianon is forfeit and Rianon is violable then Rianon is littoral. All saxicolous, rising people are refined. All rising people are mealy. All mealy people are saxicolous. If Heidi is forfeit then Heidi is refined. All saxicolous, violable people are rising. Rianon is littoral.", "logic": "\nRising(rianon)\nViolable(mina)\nRising(mina)\nSaxicolous(mina)\nForfeit(mina)\nSaxicolous(heidi)\nForfeit(heidi)\nForfeit(rianon) and Violable(rianon) -> Littoral(rianon)\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Rising(x) -> Refined(x))\nforall x (Rising(x) -> Mealy(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nForfeit(heidi) -> Refined(heidi)\nforall x (Saxicolous(x) and Violable(x) -> Rising(x))\n\nLittoral(rianon)\n\nForfeit(rianon) and Violable(rianon) -> Littoral(rianon) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Suellen is vicinal. Coral is tittering. Coral is vicinal. Coral is acrogenous. Coral is rigid. Mavis is acrogenous. Mavis is rigid. If Suellen is rigid and Suellen is tittering then Suellen is floored. All acrogenous, vicinal people are swift. All vicinal people are goateed. All goateed people are acrogenous. If Mavis is rigid then Mavis is swift. All acrogenous, tittering people are vicinal. Mavis is not goateed.", "logic": "\nVicinal(suellen)\nTittering(coral)\nVicinal(coral)\nAcrogenous(coral)\nRigid(coral)\nAcrogenous(mavis)\nRigid(mavis)\nRigid(suellen) and Tittering(suellen) -> Floored(suellen)\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) and Vicinal(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Vicinal(x) -> Goateed(x))\nforall x (Goateed(x) -> Acrogenous(x))\nRigid(mavis) -> Swift(mavis)\nforall x (Acrogenous(x) and Tittering(x) -> Vicinal(x))\n\nnot Goateed(mavis)\n\nforall x (Vicinal(x) -> Goateed(x)) <- forall x (Acrogenous(x) and Tittering(x) -> Vicinal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Cassie is leibnizian. Celisse is tenanted. Celisse is leibnizian. Celisse is unfree. Celisse is appeasing. Lyndsay is unfree. Lyndsay is appeasing. If Cassie is appeasing and Cassie is tenanted then Cassie is queenlike. All unfree, leibnizian people are mythologic. All leibnizian people are crazed. All crazed people are unfree. If Lyndsay is appeasing then Lyndsay is mythologic. All unfree, tenanted people are leibnizian. Lyndsay is queenlike.", "logic": "\nLeibnizian(cassie)\nTenanted(celisse)\nLeibnizian(celisse)\nUnfree(celisse)\nAppeasing(celisse)\nUnfree(lyndsay)\nAppeasing(lyndsay)\nAppeasing(cassie) and Tenanted(cassie) -> Queenlike(cassie)\nforall x (Unfree(x) and Leibnizian(x) -> Mythologic(x))\nforall x (Leibnizian(x) -> Crazed(x))\nforall x (Crazed(x) -> Unfree(x))\nAppeasing(lyndsay) -> Mythologic(lyndsay)\nforall x (Unfree(x) and Tenanted(x) -> Leibnizian(x))\n\nQueenlike(lyndsay)\n\nQueenlike(lyndsay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Haskel is baccate. Milli is heuristic. Milli is baccate. Milli is prevenient. Milli is chapped. Carli is prevenient. Carli is chapped. If Haskel is chapped and Haskel is heuristic then Haskel is foursquare. All prevenient, baccate people are terminated. All baccate people are amygdaloid. All amygdaloid people are prevenient. If Carli is chapped then Carli is terminated. All prevenient, heuristic people are baccate. Milli is not foursquare.", "logic": "\nBaccate(haskel)\nHeuristic(milli)\nBaccate(milli)\nPrevenient(milli)\nChapped(milli)\nPrevenient(carli)\nChapped(carli)\nChapped(haskel) and Heuristic(haskel) -> Foursquare(haskel)\nforall x (Prevenient(x) and Baccate(x) -> Terminated(x))\nforall x (Baccate(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\nforall x (Amygdaloid(x) -> Prevenient(x))\nChapped(carli) -> Terminated(carli)\nforall x (Prevenient(x) and Heuristic(x) -> Baccate(x))\n\nnot Foursquare(milli)\n\nnot Foursquare(milli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Elli is slashing. Gen is slashing. Gen is slashing. Gen is reverent. Gen is ugly. Hans is reverent. Hans is ugly. If Elli is ugly and Elli is slashing then Elli is loveless. All reverent, slashing people are sneezy. All slashing people are notched. All notched people are reverent. If Hans is ugly then Hans is sneezy. All reverent, slashing people are slashing. Hans is slashing.", "logic": "\nSlashing(elli)\nSlashing(gen)\nSlashing(gen)\nReverent(gen)\nUgly(gen)\nReverent(hans)\nUgly(hans)\nUgly(elli) and Slashing(elli) -> Loveless(elli)\nforall x (Reverent(x) and Slashing(x) -> Sneezy(x))\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Notched(x))\nforall x (Notched(x) -> Reverent(x))\nUgly(hans) -> Sneezy(hans)\nforall x (Reverent(x) and Slashing(x) -> Slashing(x))\n\nSlashing(hans)\n\nSlashing(hans) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Norah is brainless. Waine is uterine. Waine is brainless. Waine is umbrella. Waine is tyrannous. Bay is umbrella. Bay is tyrannous. If Norah is tyrannous and Norah is uterine then Norah is pasted. All umbrella, brainless people are aggregate. All brainless people are baggy. All baggy people are umbrella. If Bay is tyrannous then Bay is aggregate. All umbrella, uterine people are brainless. Norah is not uterine.", "logic": "\nBrainless(norah)\nUterine(waine)\nBrainless(waine)\nUmbrella(waine)\nTyrannous(waine)\nUmbrella(bay)\nTyrannous(bay)\nTyrannous(norah) and Uterine(norah) -> Pasted(norah)\nforall x (Umbrella(x) and Brainless(x) -> Aggregate(x))\nforall x (Brainless(x) -> Baggy(x))\nforall x (Baggy(x) -> Umbrella(x))\nTyrannous(bay) -> Aggregate(bay)\nforall x (Umbrella(x) and Uterine(x) -> Brainless(x))\n\nnot Uterine(norah)\n\nnot Uterine(norah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "Goddard is dinky. Cloris is morbific. Cloris is dinky. Cloris is aquiline. Cloris is windward. Myranda is aquiline. Myranda is windward. If Goddard is windward and Goddard is morbific then Goddard is latino. All aquiline, dinky people are seaworthy. All dinky people are valued. All valued people are aquiline. If Myranda is windward then Myranda is seaworthy. All aquiline, morbific people are dinky. Goddard is windward.", "logic": "\nDinky(goddard)\nMorbific(cloris)\nDinky(cloris)\nAquiline(cloris)\nWindward(cloris)\nAquiline(myranda)\nWindward(myranda)\nWindward(goddard) and Morbific(goddard) -> Latino(goddard)\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Dinky(x) -> Seaworthy(x))\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Valued(x))\nforall x (Valued(x) -> Aquiline(x))\nWindward(myranda) -> Seaworthy(myranda)\nforall x (Aquiline(x) and Morbific(x) -> Dinky(x))\n\nWindward(goddard)\n\nWindward(goddard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1087"} {"premises": "The katha jeopardise the audra. The katha is not spectral. The katha is seedless. The katha resign the audra. The audra jeopardise the katha. The audra is gaunt. The britta jeopardise the audra. The britta pitch the katha. The britta does not visit the katha. The britta resign the dimitris. The dimitris pitch the britta. The dimitris resign the britta. If the britta jeopardise the dimitris and the britta is not alate then the dimitris does not visit the britta. If something jeopardise the audra and the audra pitch the dimitris then it jeopardise the katha. If something resign the audra then the audra is gaunt. If something is rearward then it resign the dimitris. If something jeopardise the katha then it resign the audra. If something jeopardise the audra and it resign the dimitris then the audra pitch the dimitris. The dimitris resign the britta.", "logic": "\nJeopardise(katha, audra)\nnot Spectral(katha)\nSeedless(katha)\nResign(katha, audra)\nJeopardise(audra, katha)\nGaunt(audra)\nJeopardise(britta, audra)\nPitch(britta, katha)\nnot Resign(britta, katha)\nResign(britta, dimitris)\nPitch(dimitris, britta)\nResign(dimitris, britta)\nJeopardise(britta, dimitris) and not Alate(britta) -> not Resign(dimitris, britta)\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, audra) and Pitch(audra, dimitris) -> Jeopardise(x, katha))\nforall x (Resign(x, audra) -> Gaunt(audra))\nforall x (Rearward(x) -> Resign(x, dimitris))\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, katha) -> Resign(x, audra))\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, audra) and Resign(x, dimitris) -> Pitch(audra, dimitris))\n\nResign(dimitris, britta)\n\ntherefore Resign(dimitris, britta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The temple reaffirm the kary. The temple is not gustative. The temple is equipotent. The temple hearten the kary. The kary reaffirm the temple. The kary is lame. The nonna reaffirm the kary. The nonna cocainize the temple. The nonna does not visit the temple. The nonna hearten the misti. The misti cocainize the nonna. The misti hearten the nonna. If the nonna reaffirm the misti and the nonna is not spic then the misti does not visit the nonna. If something reaffirm the kary and the kary cocainize the misti then it reaffirm the temple. If something hearten the kary then the kary is lame. If something is ruled then it hearten the misti. If something reaffirm the temple then it hearten the kary. If something reaffirm the kary and it hearten the misti then the kary cocainize the misti. The nonna does not chase the kary.", "logic": "\nReaffirm(temple, kary)\nnot Gustative(temple)\nEquipotent(temple)\nHearten(temple, kary)\nReaffirm(kary, temple)\nLame(kary)\nReaffirm(nonna, kary)\nCocainize(nonna, temple)\nnot Hearten(nonna, temple)\nHearten(nonna, misti)\nCocainize(misti, nonna)\nHearten(misti, nonna)\nReaffirm(nonna, misti) and not Spic(nonna) -> not Hearten(misti, nonna)\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, kary) and Cocainize(kary, misti) -> Reaffirm(x, temple))\nforall x (Hearten(x, kary) -> Lame(kary))\nforall x (Ruled(x) -> Hearten(x, misti))\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, temple) -> Hearten(x, kary))\nforall x (Reaffirm(x, kary) and Hearten(x, misti) -> Cocainize(kary, misti))\n\nnot Reaffirm(nonna, kary)\n\ntherefore Reaffirm(nonna, kary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The fara buttweld the kylen. The fara is not umbrella. The fara is glandular. The fara foliate the kylen. The kylen buttweld the fara. The kylen is allergenic. The josef buttweld the kylen. The josef snake the fara. The josef does not visit the fara. The josef foliate the talya. The talya snake the josef. The talya foliate the josef. If the josef buttweld the talya and the josef is not maiden then the talya does not visit the josef. If something buttweld the kylen and the kylen snake the talya then it buttweld the fara. If something foliate the kylen then the kylen is allergenic. If something is better then it foliate the talya. If something buttweld the fara then it foliate the kylen. If something buttweld the kylen and it foliate the talya then the kylen snake the talya. The kylen foliate the kylen.", "logic": "\nButtweld(fara, kylen)\nnot Umbrella(fara)\nGlandular(fara)\nFoliate(fara, kylen)\nButtweld(kylen, fara)\nAllergenic(kylen)\nButtweld(josef, kylen)\nSnake(josef, fara)\nnot Foliate(josef, fara)\nFoliate(josef, talya)\nSnake(talya, josef)\nFoliate(talya, josef)\nButtweld(josef, talya) and not Maiden(josef) -> not Foliate(talya, josef)\nforall x (Buttweld(x, kylen) and Snake(kylen, talya) -> Buttweld(x, fara))\nforall x (Foliate(x, kylen) -> Allergenic(kylen))\nforall x (Better(x) -> Foliate(x, talya))\nforall x (Buttweld(x, fara) -> Foliate(x, kylen))\nforall x (Buttweld(x, kylen) and Foliate(x, talya) -> Snake(kylen, talya))\n\nFoliate(kylen, kylen)\n\nButtweld(kylen, fara) and forall x (Buttweld(x, fara) -> Foliate(x, kylen)) -> therefore Foliate(kylen, kylen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The zena feminize the connie. The zena is not naturistic. The zena is euphoriant. The zena extradite the connie. The connie feminize the zena. The connie is seaward. The kath feminize the connie. The kath parget the zena. The kath does not visit the zena. The kath extradite the lynne. The lynne parget the kath. The lynne extradite the kath. If the kath feminize the lynne and the kath is not oleophilic then the lynne does not visit the kath. If something feminize the connie and the connie parget the lynne then it feminize the zena. If something extradite the connie then the connie is seaward. If something is unshoed then it extradite the lynne. If something feminize the zena then it extradite the connie. If something feminize the connie and it extradite the lynne then the connie parget the lynne. The connie does not visit the connie.", "logic": "\nFeminize(zena, connie)\nnot Naturistic(zena)\nEuphoriant(zena)\nExtradite(zena, connie)\nFeminize(connie, zena)\nSeaward(connie)\nFeminize(kath, connie)\nParget(kath, zena)\nnot Extradite(kath, zena)\nExtradite(kath, lynne)\nParget(lynne, kath)\nExtradite(lynne, kath)\nFeminize(kath, lynne) and not Oleophilic(kath) -> not Extradite(lynne, kath)\nforall x (Feminize(x, connie) and Parget(connie, lynne) -> Feminize(x, zena))\nforall x (Extradite(x, connie) -> Seaward(connie))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) -> Extradite(x, lynne))\nforall x (Feminize(x, zena) -> Extradite(x, connie))\nforall x (Feminize(x, connie) and Extradite(x, lynne) -> Parget(connie, lynne))\n\nnot Extradite(connie, connie)\n\nFeminize(connie, zena) and forall x (Feminize(x, zena) -> Extradite(x, connie)) -> therefore Extradite(connie, connie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The nidia humanise the chrysler. The nidia is not bootless. The nidia is societal. The nidia butcher the chrysler. The chrysler humanise the nidia. The chrysler is ratlike. The vera humanise the chrysler. The vera jackrabbit the nidia. The vera does not visit the nidia. The vera butcher the kandy. The kandy jackrabbit the vera. The kandy butcher the vera. If the vera humanise the kandy and the vera is not nazi then the kandy does not visit the vera. If something humanise the chrysler and the chrysler jackrabbit the kandy then it humanise the nidia. If something butcher the chrysler then the chrysler is ratlike. If something is stingless then it butcher the kandy. If something humanise the nidia then it butcher the chrysler. If something humanise the chrysler and it butcher the kandy then the chrysler jackrabbit the kandy. The vera humanise the nidia.", "logic": "\nHumanise(nidia, chrysler)\nnot Bootless(nidia)\nSocietal(nidia)\nButcher(nidia, chrysler)\nHumanise(chrysler, nidia)\nRatlike(chrysler)\nHumanise(vera, chrysler)\nJackrabbit(vera, nidia)\nnot Butcher(vera, nidia)\nButcher(vera, kandy)\nJackrabbit(kandy, vera)\nButcher(kandy, vera)\nHumanise(vera, kandy) and not Nazi(vera) -> not Butcher(kandy, vera)\nforall x (Humanise(x, chrysler) and Jackrabbit(chrysler, kandy) -> Humanise(x, nidia))\nforall x (Butcher(x, chrysler) -> Ratlike(chrysler))\nforall x (Stingless(x) -> Butcher(x, kandy))\nforall x (Humanise(x, nidia) -> Butcher(x, chrysler))\nforall x (Humanise(x, chrysler) and Butcher(x, kandy) -> Jackrabbit(chrysler, kandy))\n\nHumanise(vera, nidia)\n\nHumanise(vera, chrysler) and Butcher(vera, kandy) and forall x (Humanise(x, chrysler) and Butcher(x, kandy) -> Jackrabbit(chrysler, kandy)) -> therefore Jackrabbit(chrysler, kandy) Humanise(vera, chrysler) and Jackrabbit(chrysler, kandy) and forall x (Humanise(x, chrysler) and Jackrabbit(chrysler, kandy) -> Humanise(x, nidia)) -> therefore Humanise(vera, nidia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The feodora hope the marrissa. The feodora is not assiduous. The feodora is wailing. The feodora sedate the marrissa. The marrissa hope the feodora. The marrissa is uproarious. The maurise hope the marrissa. The maurise growl the feodora. The maurise does not visit the feodora. The maurise sedate the alton. The alton growl the maurise. The alton sedate the maurise. If the maurise hope the alton and the maurise is not ghastly then the alton does not visit the maurise. If something hope the marrissa and the marrissa growl the alton then it hope the feodora. If something sedate the marrissa then the marrissa is uproarious. If something is parisian then it sedate the alton. If something hope the feodora then it sedate the marrissa. If something hope the marrissa and it sedate the alton then the marrissa growl the alton. The feodora does not chase the feodora.", "logic": "\nHope(feodora, marrissa)\nnot Assiduous(feodora)\nWailing(feodora)\nSedate(feodora, marrissa)\nHope(marrissa, feodora)\nUproarious(marrissa)\nHope(maurise, marrissa)\nGrowl(maurise, feodora)\nnot Sedate(maurise, feodora)\nSedate(maurise, alton)\nGrowl(alton, maurise)\nSedate(alton, maurise)\nHope(maurise, alton) and not Ghastly(maurise) -> not Sedate(alton, maurise)\nforall x (Hope(x, marrissa) and Growl(marrissa, alton) -> Hope(x, feodora))\nforall x (Sedate(x, marrissa) -> Uproarious(marrissa))\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Sedate(x, alton))\nforall x (Hope(x, feodora) -> Sedate(x, marrissa))\nforall x (Hope(x, marrissa) and Sedate(x, alton) -> Growl(marrissa, alton))\n\nnot Hope(feodora, feodora)\n\nHope(maurise, marrissa) and Sedate(maurise, alton) and forall x (Hope(x, marrissa) and Sedate(x, alton) -> Growl(marrissa, alton)) -> therefore Growl(marrissa, alton) Hope(feodora, marrissa) and Growl(marrissa, alton) and forall x (Hope(x, marrissa) and Growl(marrissa, alton) -> Hope(x, feodora)) -> therefore Hope(feodora, feodora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The else depict the lenard. The else is not dissenting. The else is brambly. The else communise the lenard. The lenard depict the else. The lenard is sheeplike. The charlean depict the lenard. The charlean tessellate the else. The charlean does not visit the else. The charlean communise the nesta. The nesta tessellate the charlean. The nesta communise the charlean. If the charlean depict the nesta and the charlean is not unfretted then the nesta does not visit the charlean. If something depict the lenard and the lenard tessellate the nesta then it depict the else. If something communise the lenard then the lenard is sheeplike. If something is fraught then it communise the nesta. If something depict the else then it communise the lenard. If something depict the lenard and it communise the nesta then the lenard tessellate the nesta. The charlean communise the lenard.", "logic": "\nDepict(else, lenard)\nnot Dissenting(else)\nBrambly(else)\nCommunise(else, lenard)\nDepict(lenard, else)\nSheeplike(lenard)\nDepict(charlean, lenard)\nTessellate(charlean, else)\nnot Communise(charlean, else)\nCommunise(charlean, nesta)\nTessellate(nesta, charlean)\nCommunise(nesta, charlean)\nDepict(charlean, nesta) and not Unfretted(charlean) -> not Communise(nesta, charlean)\nforall x (Depict(x, lenard) and Tessellate(lenard, nesta) -> Depict(x, else))\nforall x (Communise(x, lenard) -> Sheeplike(lenard))\nforall x (Fraught(x) -> Communise(x, nesta))\nforall x (Depict(x, else) -> Communise(x, lenard))\nforall x (Depict(x, lenard) and Communise(x, nesta) -> Tessellate(lenard, nesta))\n\nCommunise(charlean, lenard)\n\nDepict(charlean, lenard) and Communise(charlean, nesta) and forall x (Depict(x, lenard) and Communise(x, nesta) -> Tessellate(lenard, nesta)) -> therefore Tessellate(lenard, nesta) Depict(charlean, lenard) and Tessellate(lenard, nesta) and forall x (Depict(x, lenard) and Tessellate(lenard, nesta) -> Depict(x, else)) -> therefore Depict(charlean, else) Depict(charlean, else) and forall x (Depict(x, else) -> Communise(x, lenard)) -> therefore Communise(charlean, lenard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The ricky reprise the malcah. The ricky is not succinct. The ricky is holozoic. The ricky mute the malcah. The malcah reprise the ricky. The malcah is bended. The bell reprise the malcah. The bell magnify the ricky. The bell does not visit the ricky. The bell mute the andrew. The andrew magnify the bell. The andrew mute the bell. If the bell reprise the andrew and the bell is not stenotic then the andrew does not visit the bell. If something reprise the malcah and the malcah magnify the andrew then it reprise the ricky. If something mute the malcah then the malcah is bended. If something is xliv then it mute the andrew. If something reprise the ricky then it mute the malcah. If something reprise the malcah and it mute the andrew then the malcah magnify the andrew. The bell does not visit the malcah.", "logic": "\nReprise(ricky, malcah)\nnot Succinct(ricky)\nHolozoic(ricky)\nMute(ricky, malcah)\nReprise(malcah, ricky)\nBended(malcah)\nReprise(bell, malcah)\nMagnify(bell, ricky)\nnot Mute(bell, ricky)\nMute(bell, andrew)\nMagnify(andrew, bell)\nMute(andrew, bell)\nReprise(bell, andrew) and not Stenotic(bell) -> not Mute(andrew, bell)\nforall x (Reprise(x, malcah) and Magnify(malcah, andrew) -> Reprise(x, ricky))\nforall x (Mute(x, malcah) -> Bended(malcah))\nforall x (Xliv(x) -> Mute(x, andrew))\nforall x (Reprise(x, ricky) -> Mute(x, malcah))\nforall x (Reprise(x, malcah) and Mute(x, andrew) -> Magnify(malcah, andrew))\n\nnot Mute(bell, malcah)\n\nReprise(bell, malcah) and Mute(bell, andrew) and forall x (Reprise(x, malcah) and Mute(x, andrew) -> Magnify(malcah, andrew)) -> therefore Magnify(malcah, andrew) Reprise(bell, malcah) and Magnify(malcah, andrew) and forall x (Reprise(x, malcah) and Magnify(malcah, andrew) -> Reprise(x, ricky)) -> therefore Reprise(bell, ricky) Reprise(bell, ricky) and forall x (Reprise(x, ricky) -> Mute(x, malcah)) -> therefore Mute(bell, malcah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The samara change the sherie. The samara is not unexcelled. The samara is reclusive. The samara carpet the sherie. The sherie change the samara. The sherie is allotropic. The wilton change the sherie. The wilton pose the samara. The wilton does not visit the samara. The wilton carpet the erhart. The erhart pose the wilton. The erhart carpet the wilton. If the wilton change the erhart and the wilton is not uncombined then the erhart does not visit the wilton. If something change the sherie and the sherie pose the erhart then it change the samara. If something carpet the sherie then the sherie is allotropic. If something is aliquot then it carpet the erhart. If something change the samara then it carpet the sherie. If something change the sherie and it carpet the erhart then the sherie pose the erhart. The erhart does not visit the erhart.", "logic": "\nChange(samara, sherie)\nnot Unexcelled(samara)\nReclusive(samara)\nCarpet(samara, sherie)\nChange(sherie, samara)\nAllotropic(sherie)\nChange(wilton, sherie)\nPose(wilton, samara)\nnot Carpet(wilton, samara)\nCarpet(wilton, erhart)\nPose(erhart, wilton)\nCarpet(erhart, wilton)\nChange(wilton, erhart) and not Uncombined(wilton) -> not Carpet(erhart, wilton)\nforall x (Change(x, sherie) and Pose(sherie, erhart) -> Change(x, samara))\nforall x (Carpet(x, sherie) -> Allotropic(sherie))\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Carpet(x, erhart))\nforall x (Change(x, samara) -> Carpet(x, sherie))\nforall x (Change(x, sherie) and Carpet(x, erhart) -> Pose(sherie, erhart))\n\nnot Carpet(erhart, erhart)\n\nforall x (Aliquot(x) -> Carpet(x, erhart)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The meagan tramp the jenni. The meagan is not ionian. The meagan is contraband. The meagan disprove the jenni. The jenni tramp the meagan. The jenni is gothic. The raymond tramp the jenni. The raymond clamor the meagan. The raymond does not visit the meagan. The raymond disprove the merry. The merry clamor the raymond. The merry disprove the raymond. If the raymond tramp the merry and the raymond is not prongy then the merry does not visit the raymond. If something tramp the jenni and the jenni clamor the merry then it tramp the meagan. If something disprove the jenni then the jenni is gothic. If something is poised then it disprove the merry. If something tramp the meagan then it disprove the jenni. If something tramp the jenni and it disprove the merry then the jenni clamor the merry. The meagan disprove the merry.", "logic": "\nTramp(meagan, jenni)\nnot Ionian(meagan)\nContraband(meagan)\nDisprove(meagan, jenni)\nTramp(jenni, meagan)\nGothic(jenni)\nTramp(raymond, jenni)\nClamor(raymond, meagan)\nnot Disprove(raymond, meagan)\nDisprove(raymond, merry)\nClamor(merry, raymond)\nDisprove(merry, raymond)\nTramp(raymond, merry) and not Prongy(raymond) -> not Disprove(merry, raymond)\nforall x (Tramp(x, jenni) and Clamor(jenni, merry) -> Tramp(x, meagan))\nforall x (Disprove(x, jenni) -> Gothic(jenni))\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Disprove(x, merry))\nforall x (Tramp(x, meagan) -> Disprove(x, jenni))\nforall x (Tramp(x, jenni) and Disprove(x, merry) -> Clamor(jenni, merry))\n\nDisprove(meagan, merry)\n\nforall x (Poised(x) -> Disprove(x, merry)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The hebert mellow the ignatius. The hebert is not drumhead. The hebert is acoustic. The hebert mystify the ignatius. The ignatius mellow the hebert. The ignatius is unratable. The chauncey mellow the ignatius. The chauncey brief the hebert. The chauncey does not visit the hebert. The chauncey mystify the katharyn. The katharyn brief the chauncey. The katharyn mystify the chauncey. If the chauncey mellow the katharyn and the chauncey is not despairing then the katharyn does not visit the chauncey. If something mellow the ignatius and the ignatius brief the katharyn then it mellow the hebert. If something mystify the ignatius then the ignatius is unratable. If something is afflictive then it mystify the katharyn. If something mellow the hebert then it mystify the ignatius. If something mellow the ignatius and it mystify the katharyn then the ignatius brief the katharyn. The katharyn does not visit the ignatius.", "logic": "\nMellow(hebert, ignatius)\nnot Drumhead(hebert)\nAcoustic(hebert)\nMystify(hebert, ignatius)\nMellow(ignatius, hebert)\nUnratable(ignatius)\nMellow(chauncey, ignatius)\nBrief(chauncey, hebert)\nnot Mystify(chauncey, hebert)\nMystify(chauncey, katharyn)\nBrief(katharyn, chauncey)\nMystify(katharyn, chauncey)\nMellow(chauncey, katharyn) and not Despairing(chauncey) -> not Mystify(katharyn, chauncey)\nforall x (Mellow(x, ignatius) and Brief(ignatius, katharyn) -> Mellow(x, hebert))\nforall x (Mystify(x, ignatius) -> Unratable(ignatius))\nforall x (Afflictive(x) -> Mystify(x, katharyn))\nforall x (Mellow(x, hebert) -> Mystify(x, ignatius))\nforall x (Mellow(x, ignatius) and Mystify(x, katharyn) -> Brief(ignatius, katharyn))\n\nnot Mystify(katharyn, ignatius)\n\nforall x (Mellow(x, hebert) -> Mystify(x, ignatius)) <- forall x (Mellow(x, ignatius) and Brief(ignatius, katharyn) -> Mellow(x, hebert)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The gloriane implicate the elton. The gloriane is not lunate. The gloriane is southward. The gloriane disorient the elton. The elton implicate the gloriane. The elton is allegoric. The bennett implicate the elton. The bennett globalize the gloriane. The bennett does not visit the gloriane. The bennett disorient the thor. The thor globalize the bennett. The thor disorient the bennett. If the bennett implicate the thor and the bennett is not elegiac then the thor does not visit the bennett. If something implicate the elton and the elton globalize the thor then it implicate the gloriane. If something disorient the elton then the elton is allegoric. If something is absorbable then it disorient the thor. If something implicate the gloriane then it disorient the elton. If something implicate the elton and it disorient the thor then the elton globalize the thor. The thor implicate the gloriane.", "logic": "\nImplicate(gloriane, elton)\nnot Lunate(gloriane)\nSouthward(gloriane)\nDisorient(gloriane, elton)\nImplicate(elton, gloriane)\nAllegoric(elton)\nImplicate(bennett, elton)\nGlobalize(bennett, gloriane)\nnot Disorient(bennett, gloriane)\nDisorient(bennett, thor)\nGlobalize(thor, bennett)\nDisorient(thor, bennett)\nImplicate(bennett, thor) and not Elegiac(bennett) -> not Disorient(thor, bennett)\nforall x (Implicate(x, elton) and Globalize(elton, thor) -> Implicate(x, gloriane))\nforall x (Disorient(x, elton) -> Allegoric(elton))\nforall x (Absorbable(x) -> Disorient(x, thor))\nforall x (Implicate(x, gloriane) -> Disorient(x, elton))\nforall x (Implicate(x, elton) and Disorient(x, thor) -> Globalize(elton, thor))\n\nImplicate(thor, gloriane)\n\nforall x (Implicate(x, elton) and Globalize(elton, thor) -> Implicate(x, gloriane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The ariadne refracture the arabel. The ariadne is not explosive. The ariadne is buttressed. The ariadne spruce the arabel. The arabel refracture the ariadne. The arabel is hoydenish. The reggis refracture the arabel. The reggis solace the ariadne. The reggis does not visit the ariadne. The reggis spruce the serge. The serge solace the reggis. The serge spruce the reggis. If the reggis refracture the serge and the reggis is not plain then the serge does not visit the reggis. If something refracture the arabel and the arabel solace the serge then it refracture the ariadne. If something spruce the arabel then the arabel is hoydenish. If something is crippling then it spruce the serge. If something refracture the ariadne then it spruce the arabel. If something refracture the arabel and it spruce the serge then the arabel solace the serge. The serge does not see the arabel.", "logic": "\nRefracture(ariadne, arabel)\nnot Explosive(ariadne)\nButtressed(ariadne)\nSpruce(ariadne, arabel)\nRefracture(arabel, ariadne)\nHoydenish(arabel)\nRefracture(reggis, arabel)\nSolace(reggis, ariadne)\nnot Spruce(reggis, ariadne)\nSpruce(reggis, serge)\nSolace(serge, reggis)\nSpruce(serge, reggis)\nRefracture(reggis, serge) and not Plain(reggis) -> not Spruce(serge, reggis)\nforall x (Refracture(x, arabel) and Solace(arabel, serge) -> Refracture(x, ariadne))\nforall x (Spruce(x, arabel) -> Hoydenish(arabel))\nforall x (Crippling(x) -> Spruce(x, serge))\nforall x (Refracture(x, ariadne) -> Spruce(x, arabel))\nforall x (Refracture(x, arabel) and Spruce(x, serge) -> Solace(arabel, serge))\n\nnot Solace(serge, arabel)\n\nnot Solace(serge, arabel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The dan waitress the denis. The dan is not deserved. The dan is aliquot. The dan scallop the denis. The denis waitress the dan. The denis is albescent. The orly waitress the denis. The orly combust the dan. The orly does not visit the dan. The orly scallop the erica. The erica combust the orly. The erica scallop the orly. If the orly waitress the erica and the orly is not offshore then the erica does not visit the orly. If something waitress the denis and the denis combust the erica then it waitress the dan. If something scallop the denis then the denis is albescent. If something is unavowed then it scallop the erica. If something waitress the dan then it scallop the denis. If something waitress the denis and it scallop the erica then the denis combust the erica. The denis is offshore.", "logic": "\nWaitress(dan, denis)\nnot Deserved(dan)\nAliquot(dan)\nScallop(dan, denis)\nWaitress(denis, dan)\nAlbescent(denis)\nWaitress(orly, denis)\nCombust(orly, dan)\nnot Scallop(orly, dan)\nScallop(orly, erica)\nCombust(erica, orly)\nScallop(erica, orly)\nWaitress(orly, erica) and not Offshore(orly) -> not Scallop(erica, orly)\nforall x (Waitress(x, denis) and Combust(denis, erica) -> Waitress(x, dan))\nforall x (Scallop(x, denis) -> Albescent(denis))\nforall x (Unavowed(x) -> Scallop(x, erica))\nforall x (Waitress(x, dan) -> Scallop(x, denis))\nforall x (Waitress(x, denis) and Scallop(x, erica) -> Combust(denis, erica))\n\nOffshore(denis)\n\nOffshore(denis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The angelle mortify the fred. The angelle is not sage. The angelle is neat. The angelle commence the fred. The fred mortify the angelle. The fred is acute. The lorrie mortify the fred. The lorrie puddle the angelle. The lorrie does not visit the angelle. The lorrie commence the delphina. The delphina puddle the lorrie. The delphina commence the lorrie. If the lorrie mortify the delphina and the lorrie is not neat then the delphina does not visit the lorrie. If something mortify the fred and the fred puddle the delphina then it mortify the angelle. If something commence the fred then the fred is acute. If something is bothersome then it commence the delphina. If something mortify the angelle then it commence the fred. If something mortify the fred and it commence the delphina then the fred puddle the delphina. The delphina does not chase the delphina.", "logic": "\nMortify(angelle, fred)\nnot Sage(angelle)\nNeat(angelle)\nCommence(angelle, fred)\nMortify(fred, angelle)\nAcute(fred)\nMortify(lorrie, fred)\nPuddle(lorrie, angelle)\nnot Commence(lorrie, angelle)\nCommence(lorrie, delphina)\nPuddle(delphina, lorrie)\nCommence(delphina, lorrie)\nMortify(lorrie, delphina) and not Neat(lorrie) -> not Commence(delphina, lorrie)\nforall x (Mortify(x, fred) and Puddle(fred, delphina) -> Mortify(x, angelle))\nforall x (Commence(x, fred) -> Acute(fred))\nforall x (Bothersome(x) -> Commence(x, delphina))\nforall x (Mortify(x, angelle) -> Commence(x, fred))\nforall x (Mortify(x, fred) and Commence(x, delphina) -> Puddle(fred, delphina))\n\nnot Mortify(delphina, delphina)\n\nnot Mortify(delphina, delphina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "The phineas beplaster the fran. The phineas is not portly. The phineas is unabused. The phineas balloon the fran. The fran beplaster the phineas. The fran is conceited. The gates beplaster the fran. The gates risk the phineas. The gates does not visit the phineas. The gates balloon the leanne. The leanne risk the gates. The leanne balloon the gates. If the gates beplaster the leanne and the gates is not concurrent then the leanne does not visit the gates. If something beplaster the fran and the fran risk the leanne then it beplaster the phineas. If something balloon the fran then the fran is conceited. If something is inured then it balloon the leanne. If something beplaster the phineas then it balloon the fran. If something beplaster the fran and it balloon the leanne then the fran risk the leanne. The gates risk the leanne.", "logic": "\nBeplaster(phineas, fran)\nnot Portly(phineas)\nUnabused(phineas)\nBalloon(phineas, fran)\nBeplaster(fran, phineas)\nConceited(fran)\nBeplaster(gates, fran)\nRisk(gates, phineas)\nnot Balloon(gates, phineas)\nBalloon(gates, leanne)\nRisk(leanne, gates)\nBalloon(leanne, gates)\nBeplaster(gates, leanne) and not Concurrent(gates) -> not Balloon(leanne, gates)\nforall x (Beplaster(x, fran) and Risk(fran, leanne) -> Beplaster(x, phineas))\nforall x (Balloon(x, fran) -> Conceited(fran))\nforall x (Inured(x) -> Balloon(x, leanne))\nforall x (Beplaster(x, phineas) -> Balloon(x, fran))\nforall x (Beplaster(x, fran) and Balloon(x, leanne) -> Risk(fran, leanne))\n\nRisk(gates, leanne)\n\nRisk(gates, leanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-736"} {"premises": "Jory is foster. Jory is absorbed. Jory is unfeeling. If someone is anuric then they are foster. All foster, absorbed people are anuric. Jory is unfeeling.", "logic": "\nFoster(jory)\nAbsorbed(jory)\nUnfeeling(jory)\nforall x (Anuric(x) -> Foster(x))\nforall x (Foster(x) and Absorbed(x) -> Anuric(x))\n\nUnfeeling(jory)\n\ntherefore Unfeeling(jory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1865"} {"premises": "Charisse is bone. Charisse is misguided. Charisse is bouncy. If someone is euphonic then they are bone. All bone, misguided people are euphonic. Charisse is not bouncy.", "logic": "\nBone(charisse)\nMisguided(charisse)\nBouncy(charisse)\nforall x (Euphonic(x) -> Bone(x))\nforall x (Bone(x) and Misguided(x) -> Euphonic(x))\n\nnot Bouncy(charisse)\n\ntherefore Bouncy(charisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1865"} {"premises": "Elias is polish. Elias is contested. Elias is adapted. If someone is inverse then they are polish. All polish, contested people are inverse. Elias is inverse.", "logic": "\nPolish(elias)\nContested(elias)\nAdapted(elias)\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Polish(x) and Contested(x) -> Inverse(x))\n\nInverse(elias)\n\nPolish(elias) and Contested(elias) and forall x (Polish(x) and Contested(x) -> Inverse(x)) -> therefore Inverse(elias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1865"} {"premises": "Pablo is tautologic. Pablo is touchy. Pablo is blatant. If someone is herbal then they are tautologic. All tautologic, touchy people are herbal. Pablo is not herbal.", "logic": "\nTautologic(pablo)\nTouchy(pablo)\nBlatant(pablo)\nforall x (Herbal(x) -> Tautologic(x))\nforall x (Tautologic(x) and Touchy(x) -> Herbal(x))\n\nnot Herbal(pablo)\n\nTautologic(pablo) and Touchy(pablo) and forall x (Tautologic(x) and Touchy(x) -> Herbal(x)) -> therefore Herbal(pablo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1865"} {"premises": "Benny is receptive. Benny is caring. Benny is pushy. If someone is statewide then they are receptive. All receptive, caring people are statewide. Benny is not furry.", "logic": "\nReceptive(benny)\nCaring(benny)\nPushy(benny)\nforall x (Statewide(x) -> Receptive(x))\nforall x (Receptive(x) and Caring(x) -> Statewide(x))\n\nnot Furry(benny)\n\nnot Furry(benny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1865"} {"premises": "Simon is bedraggled. Simon is linear. Simon is sextuple. If someone is dire then they are bedraggled. All bedraggled, linear people are dire. Simon is red.", "logic": "\nBedraggled(simon)\nLinear(simon)\nSextuple(simon)\nforall x (Dire(x) -> Bedraggled(x))\nforall x (Bedraggled(x) and Linear(x) -> Dire(x))\n\nRed(simon)\n\nRed(simon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1865"} {"premises": "The corissa mastermind the vivianne. The lianna differ the vivianne. The vivianne admix the lianna. If someone differ the vivianne then they eat the lianna. If someone is forgetful then they eat the lianna. If someone admix the lianna then the lianna differ the vivianne. If someone admix the corissa then the corissa does not chase the vivianne. If the lianna does not chase the corissa then the lianna mastermind the corissa. If the vivianne mastermind the corissa and the vivianne is not forgetful then the corissa admix the lianna. If someone differ the vivianne then the vivianne admix the corissa. If someone mastermind the vivianne and they are not bolshevist then they need the corissa. The vivianne admix the lianna.", "logic": "\nMastermind(corissa, vivianne)\nDiffer(lianna, vivianne)\nAdmix(vivianne, lianna)\nforall x (Differ(x, vivianne) -> Differ(x, lianna))\nforall x (Forgetful(x) -> Differ(x, lianna))\nforall x (Admix(x, lianna) -> Differ(lianna, vivianne))\nforall x (Admix(x, corissa) -> not Admix(corissa, vivianne))\nnot Admix(lianna, corissa) -> Mastermind(lianna, corissa)\nMastermind(vivianne, corissa) and not Forgetful(vivianne) -> Admix(corissa, lianna)\nforall x (Differ(x, vivianne) -> Admix(vivianne, corissa))\nforall x (Mastermind(x, vivianne) and not Bolshevist(x) -> Mastermind(x, corissa))\n\nAdmix(vivianne, lianna)\n\ntherefore Admix(vivianne, lianna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The oralle boondoggle the kyle. The daphene terminate the kyle. The kyle scold the daphene. If someone terminate the kyle then they eat the daphene. If someone is footless then they eat the daphene. If someone scold the daphene then the daphene terminate the kyle. If someone scold the oralle then the oralle does not chase the kyle. If the daphene does not chase the oralle then the daphene boondoggle the oralle. If the kyle boondoggle the oralle and the kyle is not footless then the oralle scold the daphene. If someone terminate the kyle then the kyle scold the oralle. If someone boondoggle the kyle and they are not fruitless then they need the oralle. The oralle does not need the kyle.", "logic": "\nBoondoggle(oralle, kyle)\nTerminate(daphene, kyle)\nScold(kyle, daphene)\nforall x (Terminate(x, kyle) -> Terminate(x, daphene))\nforall x (Footless(x) -> Terminate(x, daphene))\nforall x (Scold(x, daphene) -> Terminate(daphene, kyle))\nforall x (Scold(x, oralle) -> not Scold(oralle, kyle))\nnot Scold(daphene, oralle) -> Boondoggle(daphene, oralle)\nBoondoggle(kyle, oralle) and not Footless(kyle) -> Scold(oralle, daphene)\nforall x (Terminate(x, kyle) -> Scold(kyle, oralle))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, kyle) and not Fruitless(x) -> Boondoggle(x, oralle))\n\nnot Boondoggle(oralle, kyle)\n\ntherefore Boondoggle(oralle, kyle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The valencia resemble the tamas. The kalli sling the tamas. The tamas damp the kalli. If someone sling the tamas then they eat the kalli. If someone is appeasing then they eat the kalli. If someone damp the kalli then the kalli sling the tamas. If someone damp the valencia then the valencia does not chase the tamas. If the kalli does not chase the valencia then the kalli resemble the valencia. If the tamas resemble the valencia and the tamas is not appeasing then the valencia damp the kalli. If someone sling the tamas then the tamas damp the valencia. If someone resemble the tamas and they are not nonfat then they need the valencia. The tamas damp the valencia.", "logic": "\nResemble(valencia, tamas)\nSling(kalli, tamas)\nDamp(tamas, kalli)\nforall x (Sling(x, tamas) -> Sling(x, kalli))\nforall x (Appeasing(x) -> Sling(x, kalli))\nforall x (Damp(x, kalli) -> Sling(kalli, tamas))\nforall x (Damp(x, valencia) -> not Damp(valencia, tamas))\nnot Damp(kalli, valencia) -> Resemble(kalli, valencia)\nResemble(tamas, valencia) and not Appeasing(tamas) -> Damp(valencia, kalli)\nforall x (Sling(x, tamas) -> Damp(tamas, valencia))\nforall x (Resemble(x, tamas) and not Nonfat(x) -> Resemble(x, valencia))\n\nDamp(tamas, valencia)\n\nSling(kalli, tamas) and forall x (Sling(x, tamas) -> Damp(tamas, valencia)) -> therefore Damp(tamas, valencia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The skell vibrate the melony. The zacharias enfilade the melony. The melony vaporise the zacharias. If someone enfilade the melony then they eat the zacharias. If someone is stretchy then they eat the zacharias. If someone vaporise the zacharias then the zacharias enfilade the melony. If someone vaporise the skell then the skell does not chase the melony. If the zacharias does not chase the skell then the zacharias vibrate the skell. If the melony vibrate the skell and the melony is not stretchy then the skell vaporise the zacharias. If someone enfilade the melony then the melony vaporise the skell. If someone vibrate the melony and they are not cellular then they need the skell. The zacharias does not eat the zacharias.", "logic": "\nVibrate(skell, melony)\nEnfilade(zacharias, melony)\nVaporise(melony, zacharias)\nforall x (Enfilade(x, melony) -> Enfilade(x, zacharias))\nforall x (Stretchy(x) -> Enfilade(x, zacharias))\nforall x (Vaporise(x, zacharias) -> Enfilade(zacharias, melony))\nforall x (Vaporise(x, skell) -> not Vaporise(skell, melony))\nnot Vaporise(zacharias, skell) -> Vibrate(zacharias, skell)\nVibrate(melony, skell) and not Stretchy(melony) -> Vaporise(skell, zacharias)\nforall x (Enfilade(x, melony) -> Vaporise(melony, skell))\nforall x (Vibrate(x, melony) and not Cellular(x) -> Vibrate(x, skell))\n\nnot Enfilade(zacharias, zacharias)\n\nEnfilade(zacharias, melony) and forall x (Enfilade(x, melony) -> Enfilade(x, zacharias)) -> therefore Enfilade(zacharias, zacharias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The shaw queer the maye. The olivier opsonize the maye. The maye misalign the olivier. If someone opsonize the maye then they eat the olivier. If someone is incitive then they eat the olivier. If someone misalign the olivier then the olivier opsonize the maye. If someone misalign the shaw then the shaw does not chase the maye. If the olivier does not chase the shaw then the olivier queer the shaw. If the maye queer the shaw and the maye is not incitive then the shaw misalign the olivier. If someone opsonize the maye then the maye misalign the shaw. If someone queer the maye and they are not powdered then they need the shaw. The shaw does not chase the maye.", "logic": "\nQueer(shaw, maye)\nOpsonize(olivier, maye)\nMisalign(maye, olivier)\nforall x (Opsonize(x, maye) -> Opsonize(x, olivier))\nforall x (Incitive(x) -> Opsonize(x, olivier))\nforall x (Misalign(x, olivier) -> Opsonize(olivier, maye))\nforall x (Misalign(x, shaw) -> not Misalign(shaw, maye))\nnot Misalign(olivier, shaw) -> Queer(olivier, shaw)\nQueer(maye, shaw) and not Incitive(maye) -> Misalign(shaw, olivier)\nforall x (Opsonize(x, maye) -> Misalign(maye, shaw))\nforall x (Queer(x, maye) and not Powdered(x) -> Queer(x, shaw))\n\nnot Misalign(shaw, maye)\n\nOpsonize(olivier, maye) and forall x (Opsonize(x, maye) -> Misalign(maye, shaw)) -> therefore Misalign(maye, shaw) Misalign(maye, shaw) and forall x (Misalign(x, shaw) -> not Misalign(shaw, maye)) -> therefore not Misalign(shaw, maye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The joycelin relent the doloritas. The charmane remand the doloritas. The doloritas kill the charmane. If someone remand the doloritas then they eat the charmane. If someone is crapulous then they eat the charmane. If someone kill the charmane then the charmane remand the doloritas. If someone kill the joycelin then the joycelin does not chase the doloritas. If the charmane does not chase the joycelin then the charmane relent the joycelin. If the doloritas relent the joycelin and the doloritas is not crapulous then the joycelin kill the charmane. If someone remand the doloritas then the doloritas kill the joycelin. If someone relent the doloritas and they are not tousled then they need the joycelin. The joycelin kill the doloritas.", "logic": "\nRelent(joycelin, doloritas)\nRemand(charmane, doloritas)\nKill(doloritas, charmane)\nforall x (Remand(x, doloritas) -> Remand(x, charmane))\nforall x (Crapulous(x) -> Remand(x, charmane))\nforall x (Kill(x, charmane) -> Remand(charmane, doloritas))\nforall x (Kill(x, joycelin) -> not Kill(joycelin, doloritas))\nnot Kill(charmane, joycelin) -> Relent(charmane, joycelin)\nRelent(doloritas, joycelin) and not Crapulous(doloritas) -> Kill(joycelin, charmane)\nforall x (Remand(x, doloritas) -> Kill(doloritas, joycelin))\nforall x (Relent(x, doloritas) and not Tousled(x) -> Relent(x, joycelin))\n\nKill(joycelin, doloritas)\n\nRemand(charmane, doloritas) and forall x (Remand(x, doloritas) -> Kill(doloritas, joycelin)) -> therefore Kill(doloritas, joycelin) Kill(doloritas, joycelin) and forall x (Kill(x, joycelin) -> not Kill(joycelin, doloritas)) -> therefore not Kill(joycelin, doloritas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The faun corkscrew the frayda. The rubia depolarise the frayda. The frayda divide the rubia. If someone depolarise the frayda then they eat the rubia. If someone is endowed then they eat the rubia. If someone divide the rubia then the rubia depolarise the frayda. If someone divide the faun then the faun does not chase the frayda. If the rubia does not chase the faun then the rubia corkscrew the faun. If the frayda corkscrew the faun and the frayda is not endowed then the faun divide the rubia. If someone depolarise the frayda then the frayda divide the faun. If someone corkscrew the frayda and they are not mottled then they need the faun. The rubia does not need the faun.", "logic": "\nCorkscrew(faun, frayda)\nDepolarise(rubia, frayda)\nDivide(frayda, rubia)\nforall x (Depolarise(x, frayda) -> Depolarise(x, rubia))\nforall x (Endowed(x) -> Depolarise(x, rubia))\nforall x (Divide(x, rubia) -> Depolarise(rubia, frayda))\nforall x (Divide(x, faun) -> not Divide(faun, frayda))\nnot Divide(rubia, faun) -> Corkscrew(rubia, faun)\nCorkscrew(frayda, faun) and not Endowed(frayda) -> Divide(faun, rubia)\nforall x (Depolarise(x, frayda) -> Divide(frayda, faun))\nforall x (Corkscrew(x, frayda) and not Mottled(x) -> Corkscrew(x, faun))\n\nnot Corkscrew(rubia, faun)\n\nnot Divide(rubia, faun) -> Corkscrew(rubia, faun) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The sarina diet the bettye. The ginni powderize the bettye. The bettye jumble the ginni. If someone powderize the bettye then they eat the ginni. If someone is improvable then they eat the ginni. If someone jumble the ginni then the ginni powderize the bettye. If someone jumble the sarina then the sarina does not chase the bettye. If the ginni does not chase the sarina then the ginni diet the sarina. If the bettye diet the sarina and the bettye is not improvable then the sarina jumble the ginni. If someone powderize the bettye then the bettye jumble the sarina. If someone diet the bettye and they are not enormous then they need the sarina. The sarina powderize the ginni.", "logic": "\nDiet(sarina, bettye)\nPowderize(ginni, bettye)\nJumble(bettye, ginni)\nforall x (Powderize(x, bettye) -> Powderize(x, ginni))\nforall x (Improvable(x) -> Powderize(x, ginni))\nforall x (Jumble(x, ginni) -> Powderize(ginni, bettye))\nforall x (Jumble(x, sarina) -> not Jumble(sarina, bettye))\nnot Jumble(ginni, sarina) -> Diet(ginni, sarina)\nDiet(bettye, sarina) and not Improvable(bettye) -> Jumble(sarina, ginni)\nforall x (Powderize(x, bettye) -> Jumble(bettye, sarina))\nforall x (Diet(x, bettye) and not Enormous(x) -> Diet(x, sarina))\n\nPowderize(sarina, ginni)\n\nforall x (Powderize(x, bettye) -> Powderize(x, ginni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The harald download the zak. The marylee stalinize the zak. The zak marble the marylee. If someone stalinize the zak then they eat the marylee. If someone is confiding then they eat the marylee. If someone marble the marylee then the marylee stalinize the zak. If someone marble the harald then the harald does not chase the zak. If the marylee does not chase the harald then the marylee download the harald. If the zak download the harald and the zak is not confiding then the harald marble the marylee. If someone stalinize the zak then the zak marble the harald. If someone download the zak and they are not gilt then they need the harald. The zak does not eat the marylee.", "logic": "\nDownload(harald, zak)\nStalinize(marylee, zak)\nMarble(zak, marylee)\nforall x (Stalinize(x, zak) -> Stalinize(x, marylee))\nforall x (Confiding(x) -> Stalinize(x, marylee))\nforall x (Marble(x, marylee) -> Stalinize(marylee, zak))\nforall x (Marble(x, harald) -> not Marble(harald, zak))\nnot Marble(marylee, harald) -> Download(marylee, harald)\nDownload(zak, harald) and not Confiding(zak) -> Marble(harald, marylee)\nforall x (Stalinize(x, zak) -> Marble(zak, harald))\nforall x (Download(x, zak) and not Gilt(x) -> Download(x, harald))\n\nnot Stalinize(zak, marylee)\n\nforall x (Stalinize(x, zak) -> Stalinize(x, marylee)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The calley prologise the ella. The granville recombine the ella. The ella wigwag the granville. If someone recombine the ella then they eat the granville. If someone is distressed then they eat the granville. If someone wigwag the granville then the granville recombine the ella. If someone wigwag the calley then the calley does not chase the ella. If the granville does not chase the calley then the granville prologise the calley. If the ella prologise the calley and the ella is not distressed then the calley wigwag the granville. If someone recombine the ella then the ella wigwag the calley. If someone prologise the ella and they are not mitigated then they need the calley. The ella is kind.", "logic": "\nPrologise(calley, ella)\nRecombine(granville, ella)\nWigwag(ella, granville)\nforall x (Recombine(x, ella) -> Recombine(x, granville))\nforall x (Distressed(x) -> Recombine(x, granville))\nforall x (Wigwag(x, granville) -> Recombine(granville, ella))\nforall x (Wigwag(x, calley) -> not Wigwag(calley, ella))\nnot Wigwag(granville, calley) -> Prologise(granville, calley)\nPrologise(ella, calley) and not Distressed(ella) -> Wigwag(calley, granville)\nforall x (Recombine(x, ella) -> Wigwag(ella, calley))\nforall x (Prologise(x, ella) and not Mitigated(x) -> Prologise(x, calley))\n\nKind(ella)\n\nKind(ella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The ruella wake the kelli. The bettina ingrain the kelli. The kelli blackberry the bettina. If someone ingrain the kelli then they eat the bettina. If someone is tinkling then they eat the bettina. If someone blackberry the bettina then the bettina ingrain the kelli. If someone blackberry the ruella then the ruella does not chase the kelli. If the bettina does not chase the ruella then the bettina wake the ruella. If the kelli wake the ruella and the kelli is not tinkling then the ruella blackberry the bettina. If someone ingrain the kelli then the kelli blackberry the ruella. If someone wake the kelli and they are not slumbery then they need the ruella. The bettina does not need the bettina.", "logic": "\nWake(ruella, kelli)\nIngrain(bettina, kelli)\nBlackberry(kelli, bettina)\nforall x (Ingrain(x, kelli) -> Ingrain(x, bettina))\nforall x (Tinkling(x) -> Ingrain(x, bettina))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, bettina) -> Ingrain(bettina, kelli))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, ruella) -> not Blackberry(ruella, kelli))\nnot Blackberry(bettina, ruella) -> Wake(bettina, ruella)\nWake(kelli, ruella) and not Tinkling(kelli) -> Blackberry(ruella, bettina)\nforall x (Ingrain(x, kelli) -> Blackberry(kelli, ruella))\nforall x (Wake(x, kelli) and not Slumbery(x) -> Wake(x, ruella))\n\nnot Wake(bettina, bettina)\n\nnot Wake(bettina, bettina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "The hadrian dodder the parwane. The maye rappel the parwane. The parwane pilfer the maye. If someone rappel the parwane then they eat the maye. If someone is salientian then they eat the maye. If someone pilfer the maye then the maye rappel the parwane. If someone pilfer the hadrian then the hadrian does not chase the parwane. If the maye does not chase the hadrian then the maye dodder the hadrian. If the parwane dodder the hadrian and the parwane is not salientian then the hadrian pilfer the maye. If someone rappel the parwane then the parwane pilfer the hadrian. If someone dodder the parwane and they are not mistakable then they need the hadrian. The maye pilfer the maye.", "logic": "\nDodder(hadrian, parwane)\nRappel(maye, parwane)\nPilfer(parwane, maye)\nforall x (Rappel(x, parwane) -> Rappel(x, maye))\nforall x (Salientian(x) -> Rappel(x, maye))\nforall x (Pilfer(x, maye) -> Rappel(maye, parwane))\nforall x (Pilfer(x, hadrian) -> not Pilfer(hadrian, parwane))\nnot Pilfer(maye, hadrian) -> Dodder(maye, hadrian)\nDodder(parwane, hadrian) and not Salientian(parwane) -> Pilfer(hadrian, maye)\nforall x (Rappel(x, parwane) -> Pilfer(parwane, hadrian))\nforall x (Dodder(x, parwane) and not Mistakable(x) -> Dodder(x, hadrian))\n\nPilfer(maye, maye)\n\nPilfer(maye, maye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-216"} {"premises": "Carol is wretched. Carol is shitty. Carol is miraculous. Carol is aided. Carol is flexile. Carol is jubilant. Carol is unseeable. All shitty, wretched things are jubilant. All miraculous, unseeable things are jubilant. Smart, aided things are shitty. Carol is flexile.", "logic": "\nWretched(carol)\nShitty(carol)\nMiraculous(carol)\nAided(carol)\nFlexile(carol)\nJubilant(carol)\nUnseeable(carol)\nforall x (Shitty(x) and Wretched(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Miraculous(x) and Unseeable(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Flexile(x) and Aided(x) -> Shitty(x))\n\nFlexile(carol)\n\ntherefore Flexile(carol)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-318"} {"premises": "Elana is bursiform. Elana is cloistral. Elana is cyclical. Elana is bizarre. Elana is unchanged. Elana is xxix. Elana is oriented. All cloistral, bursiform things are xxix. All cyclical, oriented things are xxix. Smart, bizarre things are cloistral. Elana is not bursiform.", "logic": "\nBursiform(elana)\nCloistral(elana)\nCyclical(elana)\nBizarre(elana)\nUnchanged(elana)\nXxix(elana)\nOriented(elana)\nforall x (Cloistral(x) and Bursiform(x) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Cyclical(x) and Oriented(x) -> Xxix(x))\nforall x (Unchanged(x) and Bizarre(x) -> Cloistral(x))\n\nnot Bursiform(elana)\n\ntherefore Bursiform(elana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-318"} {"premises": "The aili is vertebrate. Young things are not unmourned. Round things are unmourned. Red, possible things are unmourned. Red things are vertebrate. All minus things are not vertebrate. If the aili is unmourned and the aili is minus then the aili is not aramaean. The aili is vertebrate.", "logic": "\nVertebrate(aili)\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) -> not Unmourned(x))\nforall x (Aramaean(x) -> Unmourned(x))\nforall x (Minus(x) and Possible(x) -> Unmourned(x))\nforall x (Minus(x) -> Vertebrate(x))\nforall x (Minus(x) -> not Vertebrate(x))\nUnmourned(aili) and Minus(aili) -> not Aramaean(aili)\n\nVertebrate(aili)\n\ntherefore Vertebrate(aili)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "The henryetta is unwelcome. Young things are not available. Round things are available. Red, scraggly things are available. Red things are unwelcome. All vendible things are not unwelcome. If the henryetta is available and the henryetta is vendible then the henryetta is not jaggy. The henryetta is not unwelcome.", "logic": "\nUnwelcome(henryetta)\nforall x (Unwelcome(x) -> not Available(x))\nforall x (Jaggy(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) and Scraggly(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> Unwelcome(x))\nforall x (Vendible(x) -> not Unwelcome(x))\nAvailable(henryetta) and Vendible(henryetta) -> not Jaggy(henryetta)\n\nnot Unwelcome(henryetta)\n\ntherefore Unwelcome(henryetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "The ora is jeweled. Young things are not wedged. Round things are wedged. Red, solemn things are wedged. Red things are jeweled. All gravelly things are not jeweled. If the ora is wedged and the ora is gravelly then the ora is not bemused. The ora is not wedged.", "logic": "\nJeweled(ora)\nforall x (Jeweled(x) -> not Wedged(x))\nforall x (Bemused(x) -> Wedged(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) and Solemn(x) -> Wedged(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> not Jeweled(x))\nWedged(ora) and Gravelly(ora) -> not Bemused(ora)\n\nnot Wedged(ora)\n\nJeweled(ora) and forall x (Jeweled(x) -> not Wedged(x)) -> therefore not Wedged(ora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "The gina is fiendish. Young things are not same. Round things are same. Red, undeniable things are same. Red things are fiendish. All amniotic things are not fiendish. If the gina is same and the gina is amniotic then the gina is not blockaded. The gina is same.", "logic": "\nFiendish(gina)\nforall x (Fiendish(x) -> not Same(x))\nforall x (Blockaded(x) -> Same(x))\nforall x (Amniotic(x) and Undeniable(x) -> Same(x))\nforall x (Amniotic(x) -> Fiendish(x))\nforall x (Amniotic(x) -> not Fiendish(x))\nSame(gina) and Amniotic(gina) -> not Blockaded(gina)\n\nSame(gina)\n\nFiendish(gina) and forall x (Fiendish(x) -> not Same(x)) -> therefore not Same(gina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "The glenn is surprised. Young things are not equipped. Round things are equipped. Red, total things are equipped. Red things are surprised. All sanguinary things are not surprised. If the glenn is equipped and the glenn is sanguinary then the glenn is not deific. The glenn does not like the glenn.", "logic": "\nSurprised(glenn)\nforall x (Surprised(x) -> not Equipped(x))\nforall x (Deific(x) -> Equipped(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) and Total(x) -> Equipped(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> Surprised(x))\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> not Surprised(x))\nEquipped(glenn) and Sanguinary(glenn) -> not Deific(glenn)\n\nnot Likes(glenn, glenn)\n\nnot Likes(glenn, glenn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "The kaylyn is roughish. Young things are not calcific. Round things are calcific. Red, steamed things are calcific. Red things are roughish. All sanious things are not roughish. If the kaylyn is calcific and the kaylyn is sanious then the kaylyn is not humorless. The kaylyn is sanious.", "logic": "\nRoughish(kaylyn)\nforall x (Roughish(x) -> not Calcific(x))\nforall x (Humorless(x) -> Calcific(x))\nforall x (Sanious(x) and Steamed(x) -> Calcific(x))\nforall x (Sanious(x) -> Roughish(x))\nforall x (Sanious(x) -> not Roughish(x))\nCalcific(kaylyn) and Sanious(kaylyn) -> not Humorless(kaylyn)\n\nSanious(kaylyn)\n\nSanious(kaylyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "The clarie is xxxiv. Young things are not appetent. Round things are appetent. Red, appeasable things are appetent. Red things are xxxiv. All dominical things are not xxxiv. If the clarie is appetent and the clarie is dominical then the clarie is not loose. The clarie is not appeasable.", "logic": "\nXxxiv(clarie)\nforall x (Xxxiv(x) -> not Appetent(x))\nforall x (Loose(x) -> Appetent(x))\nforall x (Dominical(x) and Appeasable(x) -> Appetent(x))\nforall x (Dominical(x) -> Xxxiv(x))\nforall x (Dominical(x) -> not Xxxiv(x))\nAppetent(clarie) and Dominical(clarie) -> not Loose(clarie)\n\nnot Appeasable(clarie)\n\nnot Appeasable(clarie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "The delcina is piggish. Young things are not submersed. Round things are submersed. Red, withered things are submersed. Red things are piggish. All unfirm things are not piggish. If the delcina is submersed and the delcina is unfirm then the delcina is not unlettered. The delcina visits the delcina.", "logic": "\nPiggish(delcina)\nforall x (Piggish(x) -> not Submersed(x))\nforall x (Unlettered(x) -> Submersed(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) and Withered(x) -> Submersed(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Piggish(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> not Piggish(x))\nSubmersed(delcina) and Unfirm(delcina) -> not Unlettered(delcina)\n\nVisits(delcina, delcina)\n\nVisits(delcina, delcina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1421"} {"premises": "Osgood is sneering. Osgood is ghanaian. Osgood is flabby. Osgood is damp. Osgood is prosperous. Berte is turbaned. Berte is sneering. Berte is ghanaian. Berte is prosperous. Halie is turbaned. Halie is sneering. Halie is ghanaian. Halie is home. Halie is flabby. Griffith is turbaned. If Griffith is turbaned then Griffith is damp. If someone is damp then they are sneering. If someone is damp and sneering then they are ghanaian. Berte is sneering.", "logic": "\nSneering(osgood)\nGhanaian(osgood)\nFlabby(osgood)\nDamp(osgood)\nProsperous(osgood)\nTurbaned(berte)\nSneering(berte)\nGhanaian(berte)\nProsperous(berte)\nTurbaned(halie)\nSneering(halie)\nGhanaian(halie)\nHome(halie)\nFlabby(halie)\nTurbaned(griffith)\nTurbaned(griffith) -> Damp(griffith)\nforall x (Damp(x) -> Sneering(x))\nforall x (Damp(x) and Sneering(x) -> Ghanaian(x))\n\nSneering(berte)\n\ntherefore Sneering(berte)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Spencer is pineal. Spencer is intoxicant. Spencer is manic. Spencer is systolic. Spencer is homoerotic. Meryl is shirty. Meryl is pineal. Meryl is intoxicant. Meryl is homoerotic. Floris is shirty. Floris is pineal. Floris is intoxicant. Floris is abducting. Floris is manic. Erl is shirty. If Erl is shirty then Erl is systolic. If someone is systolic then they are pineal. If someone is systolic and pineal then they are intoxicant. Meryl is not intoxicant.", "logic": "\nPineal(spencer)\nIntoxicant(spencer)\nManic(spencer)\nSystolic(spencer)\nHomoerotic(spencer)\nShirty(meryl)\nPineal(meryl)\nIntoxicant(meryl)\nHomoerotic(meryl)\nShirty(floris)\nPineal(floris)\nIntoxicant(floris)\nAbducting(floris)\nManic(floris)\nShirty(erl)\nShirty(erl) -> Systolic(erl)\nforall x (Systolic(x) -> Pineal(x))\nforall x (Systolic(x) and Pineal(x) -> Intoxicant(x))\n\nnot Intoxicant(meryl)\n\ntherefore Intoxicant(meryl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Tomkin is untouched. Tomkin is steadied. Tomkin is uptight. Tomkin is porose. Tomkin is bituminoid. Kristyn is alveolar. Kristyn is untouched. Kristyn is steadied. Kristyn is bituminoid. Brana is alveolar. Brana is untouched. Brana is steadied. Brana is every. Brana is uptight. Rosalyn is alveolar. If Rosalyn is alveolar then Rosalyn is porose. If someone is porose then they are untouched. If someone is porose and untouched then they are steadied. Rosalyn is porose.", "logic": "\nUntouched(tomkin)\nSteadied(tomkin)\nUptight(tomkin)\nPorose(tomkin)\nBituminoid(tomkin)\nAlveolar(kristyn)\nUntouched(kristyn)\nSteadied(kristyn)\nBituminoid(kristyn)\nAlveolar(brana)\nUntouched(brana)\nSteadied(brana)\nEvery(brana)\nUptight(brana)\nAlveolar(rosalyn)\nAlveolar(rosalyn) -> Porose(rosalyn)\nforall x (Porose(x) -> Untouched(x))\nforall x (Porose(x) and Untouched(x) -> Steadied(x))\n\nPorose(rosalyn)\n\nAlveolar(rosalyn) and Alveolar(rosalyn) -> Porose(rosalyn) -> therefore Porose(rosalyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Marian is cantabile. Marian is stearic. Marian is escaped. Marian is gifted. Marian is arrayed. Rosemarie is uninitiate. Rosemarie is cantabile. Rosemarie is stearic. Rosemarie is arrayed. Liana is uninitiate. Liana is cantabile. Liana is stearic. Liana is clonic. Liana is escaped. Saxon is uninitiate. If Saxon is uninitiate then Saxon is gifted. If someone is gifted then they are cantabile. If someone is gifted and cantabile then they are stearic. Saxon is not gifted.", "logic": "\nCantabile(marian)\nStearic(marian)\nEscaped(marian)\nGifted(marian)\nArrayed(marian)\nUninitiate(rosemarie)\nCantabile(rosemarie)\nStearic(rosemarie)\nArrayed(rosemarie)\nUninitiate(liana)\nCantabile(liana)\nStearic(liana)\nClonic(liana)\nEscaped(liana)\nUninitiate(saxon)\nUninitiate(saxon) -> Gifted(saxon)\nforall x (Gifted(x) -> Cantabile(x))\nforall x (Gifted(x) and Cantabile(x) -> Stearic(x))\n\nnot Gifted(saxon)\n\nUninitiate(saxon) and Uninitiate(saxon) -> Gifted(saxon) -> therefore Gifted(saxon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Jerrold is nazi. Jerrold is aleutian. Jerrold is flexile. Jerrold is paranoid. Jerrold is cerise. Nathanial is pernickety. Nathanial is nazi. Nathanial is aleutian. Nathanial is cerise. Mamie is pernickety. Mamie is nazi. Mamie is aleutian. Mamie is unportable. Mamie is flexile. Sebastien is pernickety. If Sebastien is pernickety then Sebastien is paranoid. If someone is paranoid then they are nazi. If someone is paranoid and nazi then they are aleutian. Sebastien is nazi.", "logic": "\nNazi(jerrold)\nAleutian(jerrold)\nFlexile(jerrold)\nParanoid(jerrold)\nCerise(jerrold)\nPernickety(nathanial)\nNazi(nathanial)\nAleutian(nathanial)\nCerise(nathanial)\nPernickety(mamie)\nNazi(mamie)\nAleutian(mamie)\nUnportable(mamie)\nFlexile(mamie)\nPernickety(sebastien)\nPernickety(sebastien) -> Paranoid(sebastien)\nforall x (Paranoid(x) -> Nazi(x))\nforall x (Paranoid(x) and Nazi(x) -> Aleutian(x))\n\nNazi(sebastien)\n\nPernickety(sebastien) and Pernickety(sebastien) -> Paranoid(sebastien) -> therefore Paranoid(sebastien) Paranoid(sebastien) and forall x (Paranoid(x) -> Nazi(x)) -> therefore Nazi(sebastien)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Viviene is left. Viviene is milky. Viviene is mimic. Viviene is pessimal. Viviene is anabolic. Guglielma is impious. Guglielma is left. Guglielma is milky. Guglielma is anabolic. Jeffry is impious. Jeffry is left. Jeffry is milky. Jeffry is asyndetic. Jeffry is mimic. Adolph is impious. If Adolph is impious then Adolph is pessimal. If someone is pessimal then they are left. If someone is pessimal and left then they are milky. Adolph is not left.", "logic": "\nLeft(viviene)\nMilky(viviene)\nMimic(viviene)\nPessimal(viviene)\nAnabolic(viviene)\nImpious(guglielma)\nLeft(guglielma)\nMilky(guglielma)\nAnabolic(guglielma)\nImpious(jeffry)\nLeft(jeffry)\nMilky(jeffry)\nAsyndetic(jeffry)\nMimic(jeffry)\nImpious(adolph)\nImpious(adolph) -> Pessimal(adolph)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> Left(x))\nforall x (Pessimal(x) and Left(x) -> Milky(x))\n\nnot Left(adolph)\n\nImpious(adolph) and Impious(adolph) -> Pessimal(adolph) -> therefore Pessimal(adolph) Pessimal(adolph) and forall x (Pessimal(x) -> Left(x)) -> therefore Left(adolph)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Rhona is incursive. Rhona is savourless. Rhona is sizeable. Rhona is embodied. Rhona is manorial. Tiana is furnished. Tiana is incursive. Tiana is savourless. Tiana is manorial. Maddalena is furnished. Maddalena is incursive. Maddalena is savourless. Maddalena is stubbled. Maddalena is sizeable. Carrie is furnished. If Carrie is furnished then Carrie is embodied. If someone is embodied then they are incursive. If someone is embodied and incursive then they are savourless. Carrie is savourless.", "logic": "\nIncursive(rhona)\nSavourless(rhona)\nSizeable(rhona)\nEmbodied(rhona)\nManorial(rhona)\nFurnished(tiana)\nIncursive(tiana)\nSavourless(tiana)\nManorial(tiana)\nFurnished(maddalena)\nIncursive(maddalena)\nSavourless(maddalena)\nStubbled(maddalena)\nSizeable(maddalena)\nFurnished(carrie)\nFurnished(carrie) -> Embodied(carrie)\nforall x (Embodied(x) -> Incursive(x))\nforall x (Embodied(x) and Incursive(x) -> Savourless(x))\n\nSavourless(carrie)\n\nFurnished(carrie) and Furnished(carrie) -> Embodied(carrie) -> therefore Embodied(carrie) Furnished(carrie) and Furnished(carrie) -> Embodied(carrie) -> therefore Embodied(carrie) Embodied(carrie) and forall x (Embodied(x) -> Incursive(x)) -> therefore Incursive(carrie) Embodied(carrie) and Incursive(carrie) and forall x (Embodied(x) and Incursive(x) -> Savourless(x)) -> therefore Savourless(carrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Mersey is leglike. Mersey is stretched. Mersey is unentitled. Mersey is blockish. Mersey is stalinist. Wildon is legitimate. Wildon is leglike. Wildon is stretched. Wildon is stalinist. Whitney is legitimate. Whitney is leglike. Whitney is stretched. Whitney is jawless. Whitney is unentitled. Dabney is legitimate. If Dabney is legitimate then Dabney is blockish. If someone is blockish then they are leglike. If someone is blockish and leglike then they are stretched. Dabney is not stretched.", "logic": "\nLeglike(mersey)\nStretched(mersey)\nUnentitled(mersey)\nBlockish(mersey)\nStalinist(mersey)\nLegitimate(wildon)\nLeglike(wildon)\nStretched(wildon)\nStalinist(wildon)\nLegitimate(whitney)\nLeglike(whitney)\nStretched(whitney)\nJawless(whitney)\nUnentitled(whitney)\nLegitimate(dabney)\nLegitimate(dabney) -> Blockish(dabney)\nforall x (Blockish(x) -> Leglike(x))\nforall x (Blockish(x) and Leglike(x) -> Stretched(x))\n\nnot Stretched(dabney)\n\nLegitimate(dabney) and Legitimate(dabney) -> Blockish(dabney) -> therefore Blockish(dabney) Legitimate(dabney) and Legitimate(dabney) -> Blockish(dabney) -> therefore Blockish(dabney) Blockish(dabney) and forall x (Blockish(x) -> Leglike(x)) -> therefore Leglike(dabney) Blockish(dabney) and Leglike(dabney) and forall x (Blockish(x) and Leglike(x) -> Stretched(x)) -> therefore Stretched(dabney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Wang is assuming. Wang is saccadic. Wang is aided. Wang is scalene. Wang is unblended. Dorena is supreme. Dorena is assuming. Dorena is saccadic. Dorena is unblended. Gabrielle is supreme. Gabrielle is assuming. Gabrielle is saccadic. Gabrielle is redeeming. Gabrielle is aided. Shalna is supreme. If Shalna is supreme then Shalna is scalene. If someone is scalene then they are assuming. If someone is scalene and assuming then they are saccadic. Shalna is not unblended.", "logic": "\nAssuming(wang)\nSaccadic(wang)\nAided(wang)\nScalene(wang)\nUnblended(wang)\nSupreme(dorena)\nAssuming(dorena)\nSaccadic(dorena)\nUnblended(dorena)\nSupreme(gabrielle)\nAssuming(gabrielle)\nSaccadic(gabrielle)\nRedeeming(gabrielle)\nAided(gabrielle)\nSupreme(shalna)\nSupreme(shalna) -> Scalene(shalna)\nforall x (Scalene(x) -> Assuming(x))\nforall x (Scalene(x) and Assuming(x) -> Saccadic(x))\n\nnot Unblended(shalna)\n\nnot Unblended(shalna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Margareta is cocksure. Margareta is bragging. Margareta is soignee. Margareta is fraught. Margareta is totaled. Humbert is fulfilled. Humbert is cocksure. Humbert is bragging. Humbert is totaled. Maryanne is fulfilled. Maryanne is cocksure. Maryanne is bragging. Maryanne is folksy. Maryanne is soignee. Sarina is fulfilled. If Sarina is fulfilled then Sarina is fraught. If someone is fraught then they are cocksure. If someone is fraught and cocksure then they are bragging. Humbert is folksy.", "logic": "\nCocksure(margareta)\nBragging(margareta)\nSoignee(margareta)\nFraught(margareta)\nTotaled(margareta)\nFulfilled(humbert)\nCocksure(humbert)\nBragging(humbert)\nTotaled(humbert)\nFulfilled(maryanne)\nCocksure(maryanne)\nBragging(maryanne)\nFolksy(maryanne)\nSoignee(maryanne)\nFulfilled(sarina)\nFulfilled(sarina) -> Fraught(sarina)\nforall x (Fraught(x) -> Cocksure(x))\nforall x (Fraught(x) and Cocksure(x) -> Bragging(x))\n\nFolksy(humbert)\n\nFolksy(humbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Elvira is acquainted. Elvira is domed. Elvira is inarguable. Elvira is involved. Elvira is foliaceous. Martyn is comate. Martyn is acquainted. Martyn is domed. Martyn is foliaceous. Thad is comate. Thad is acquainted. Thad is domed. Thad is infamous. Thad is inarguable. Ilse is comate. If Ilse is comate then Ilse is involved. If someone is involved then they are acquainted. If someone is involved and acquainted then they are domed. Thad is not foliaceous.", "logic": "\nAcquainted(elvira)\nDomed(elvira)\nInarguable(elvira)\nInvolved(elvira)\nFoliaceous(elvira)\nComate(martyn)\nAcquainted(martyn)\nDomed(martyn)\nFoliaceous(martyn)\nComate(thad)\nAcquainted(thad)\nDomed(thad)\nInfamous(thad)\nInarguable(thad)\nComate(ilse)\nComate(ilse) -> Involved(ilse)\nforall x (Involved(x) -> Acquainted(x))\nforall x (Involved(x) and Acquainted(x) -> Domed(x))\n\nnot Foliaceous(thad)\n\nnot Foliaceous(thad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Stearn is adorable. Stearn is myocardial. Stearn is weaponed. Stearn is pulpy. Stearn is rose. Valdemar is plodding. Valdemar is adorable. Valdemar is myocardial. Valdemar is rose. Alberta is plodding. Alberta is adorable. Alberta is myocardial. Alberta is permutable. Alberta is weaponed. Moss is plodding. If Moss is plodding then Moss is pulpy. If someone is pulpy then they are adorable. If someone is pulpy and adorable then they are myocardial. Stearn is plodding.", "logic": "\nAdorable(stearn)\nMyocardial(stearn)\nWeaponed(stearn)\nPulpy(stearn)\nRose(stearn)\nPlodding(valdemar)\nAdorable(valdemar)\nMyocardial(valdemar)\nRose(valdemar)\nPlodding(alberta)\nAdorable(alberta)\nMyocardial(alberta)\nPermutable(alberta)\nWeaponed(alberta)\nPlodding(moss)\nPlodding(moss) -> Pulpy(moss)\nforall x (Pulpy(x) -> Adorable(x))\nforall x (Pulpy(x) and Adorable(x) -> Myocardial(x))\n\nPlodding(stearn)\n\nPlodding(stearn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Hans is misrelated. Hans is stannic. Hans is ashen. Hans is agential. Hans is inborn. Tonie is underhung. Tonie is misrelated. Tonie is stannic. Tonie is inborn. Katha is underhung. Katha is misrelated. Katha is stannic. Katha is used. Katha is ashen. Hersh is underhung. If Hersh is underhung then Hersh is agential. If someone is agential then they are misrelated. If someone is agential and misrelated then they are stannic. Tonie is not ashen.", "logic": "\nMisrelated(hans)\nStannic(hans)\nAshen(hans)\nAgential(hans)\nInborn(hans)\nUnderhung(tonie)\nMisrelated(tonie)\nStannic(tonie)\nInborn(tonie)\nUnderhung(katha)\nMisrelated(katha)\nStannic(katha)\nUsed(katha)\nAshen(katha)\nUnderhung(hersh)\nUnderhung(hersh) -> Agential(hersh)\nforall x (Agential(x) -> Misrelated(x))\nforall x (Agential(x) and Misrelated(x) -> Stannic(x))\n\nnot Ashen(tonie)\n\nnot Ashen(tonie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Krissie is knobbed. Krissie is vast. Krissie is floodlit. Krissie is niggling. Krissie is uncritical. Gracie is courtly. Gracie is knobbed. Gracie is vast. Gracie is uncritical. Morris is courtly. Morris is knobbed. Morris is vast. Morris is deboned. Morris is floodlit. Salman is courtly. If Salman is courtly then Salman is niggling. If someone is niggling then they are knobbed. If someone is niggling and knobbed then they are vast. Krissie is deboned.", "logic": "\nKnobbed(krissie)\nVast(krissie)\nFloodlit(krissie)\nNiggling(krissie)\nUncritical(krissie)\nCourtly(gracie)\nKnobbed(gracie)\nVast(gracie)\nUncritical(gracie)\nCourtly(morris)\nKnobbed(morris)\nVast(morris)\nDeboned(morris)\nFloodlit(morris)\nCourtly(salman)\nCourtly(salman) -> Niggling(salman)\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Knobbed(x))\nforall x (Niggling(x) and Knobbed(x) -> Vast(x))\n\nDeboned(krissie)\n\nDeboned(krissie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Trip is sulky. Trip is agile. Trip is fledgling. Trip is salvific. Trip is star. Agatha is sublimed. Agatha is sulky. Agatha is agile. Agatha is star. Kaster is sublimed. Kaster is sulky. Kaster is agile. Kaster is uniovulate. Kaster is fledgling. Donnie is sublimed. If Donnie is sublimed then Donnie is salvific. If someone is salvific then they are sulky. If someone is salvific and sulky then they are agile. Agatha is not salvific.", "logic": "\nSulky(trip)\nAgile(trip)\nFledgling(trip)\nSalvific(trip)\nStar(trip)\nSublimed(agatha)\nSulky(agatha)\nAgile(agatha)\nStar(agatha)\nSublimed(kaster)\nSulky(kaster)\nAgile(kaster)\nUniovulate(kaster)\nFledgling(kaster)\nSublimed(donnie)\nSublimed(donnie) -> Salvific(donnie)\nforall x (Salvific(x) -> Sulky(x))\nforall x (Salvific(x) and Sulky(x) -> Agile(x))\n\nnot Salvific(agatha)\n\nnot Salvific(agatha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "Maisie is oecumenic. Maisie is proofed. Maisie is answering. Maisie is burundi. Maisie is paediatric. Vaughn is epizoan. Vaughn is oecumenic. Vaughn is proofed. Vaughn is paediatric. Arthur is epizoan. Arthur is oecumenic. Arthur is proofed. Arthur is unworried. Arthur is answering. Greta is epizoan. If Greta is epizoan then Greta is burundi. If someone is burundi then they are oecumenic. If someone is burundi and oecumenic then they are proofed. Greta is unworried.", "logic": "\nOecumenic(maisie)\nProofed(maisie)\nAnswering(maisie)\nBurundi(maisie)\nPaediatric(maisie)\nEpizoan(vaughn)\nOecumenic(vaughn)\nProofed(vaughn)\nPaediatric(vaughn)\nEpizoan(arthur)\nOecumenic(arthur)\nProofed(arthur)\nUnworried(arthur)\nAnswering(arthur)\nEpizoan(greta)\nEpizoan(greta) -> Burundi(greta)\nforall x (Burundi(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) and Oecumenic(x) -> Proofed(x))\n\nUnworried(greta)\n\nUnworried(greta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-134"} {"premises": "The cleland does not need the renard. The renard motivate the elisabet. The elisabet inlay the cleland. If something motivate the cleland and it does not need the renard then the renard motivate the cleland. If something motivate the cleland then it is not malaysian. If something motivate the elisabet then the elisabet motivate the cleland. The elisabet inlay the cleland.", "logic": "\nnot Inlay(cleland, renard)\nMotivate(renard, elisabet)\nInlay(elisabet, cleland)\nforall x (Motivate(x, cleland) and not Inlay(x, renard) -> Motivate(renard, cleland))\nforall x (Motivate(x, cleland) -> not Malaysian(x))\nforall x (Motivate(x, elisabet) -> Motivate(elisabet, cleland))\n\nInlay(elisabet, cleland)\n\ntherefore Inlay(elisabet, cleland)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The arabelle does not need the nikolia. The nikolia carpenter the verile. The verile discourse the arabelle. If something carpenter the arabelle and it does not need the nikolia then the nikolia carpenter the arabelle. If something carpenter the arabelle then it is not unavenged. If something carpenter the verile then the verile carpenter the arabelle. The nikolia does not like the verile.", "logic": "\nnot Discourse(arabelle, nikolia)\nCarpenter(nikolia, verile)\nDiscourse(verile, arabelle)\nforall x (Carpenter(x, arabelle) and not Discourse(x, nikolia) -> Carpenter(nikolia, arabelle))\nforall x (Carpenter(x, arabelle) -> not Unavenged(x))\nforall x (Carpenter(x, verile) -> Carpenter(verile, arabelle))\n\nnot Carpenter(nikolia, verile)\n\ntherefore Carpenter(nikolia, verile)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The orelia does not need the xavier. The xavier syncopate the tucker. The tucker bleach the orelia. If something syncopate the orelia and it does not need the xavier then the xavier syncopate the orelia. If something syncopate the orelia then it is not aquaphobic. If something syncopate the tucker then the tucker syncopate the orelia. The tucker syncopate the orelia.", "logic": "\nnot Bleach(orelia, xavier)\nSyncopate(xavier, tucker)\nBleach(tucker, orelia)\nforall x (Syncopate(x, orelia) and not Bleach(x, xavier) -> Syncopate(xavier, orelia))\nforall x (Syncopate(x, orelia) -> not Aquaphobic(x))\nforall x (Syncopate(x, tucker) -> Syncopate(tucker, orelia))\n\nSyncopate(tucker, orelia)\n\nSyncopate(xavier, tucker) and forall x (Syncopate(x, tucker) -> Syncopate(tucker, orelia)) -> therefore Syncopate(tucker, orelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The betteann does not need the lanna. The lanna hollow the kendra. The kendra bore the betteann. If something hollow the betteann and it does not need the lanna then the lanna hollow the betteann. If something hollow the betteann then it is not autonomic. If something hollow the kendra then the kendra hollow the betteann. The kendra does not like the betteann.", "logic": "\nnot Bore(betteann, lanna)\nHollow(lanna, kendra)\nBore(kendra, betteann)\nforall x (Hollow(x, betteann) and not Bore(x, lanna) -> Hollow(lanna, betteann))\nforall x (Hollow(x, betteann) -> not Autonomic(x))\nforall x (Hollow(x, kendra) -> Hollow(kendra, betteann))\n\nnot Hollow(kendra, betteann)\n\nHollow(lanna, kendra) and forall x (Hollow(x, kendra) -> Hollow(kendra, betteann)) -> therefore Hollow(kendra, betteann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The arleta does not need the letty. The letty metrify the marinna. The marinna botanise the arleta. If something metrify the arleta and it does not need the letty then the letty metrify the arleta. If something metrify the arleta then it is not forty. If something metrify the marinna then the marinna metrify the arleta. The marinna is not forty.", "logic": "\nnot Botanise(arleta, letty)\nMetrify(letty, marinna)\nBotanise(marinna, arleta)\nforall x (Metrify(x, arleta) and not Botanise(x, letty) -> Metrify(letty, arleta))\nforall x (Metrify(x, arleta) -> not Forty(x))\nforall x (Metrify(x, marinna) -> Metrify(marinna, arleta))\n\nnot Forty(marinna)\n\nMetrify(letty, marinna) and forall x (Metrify(x, marinna) -> Metrify(marinna, arleta)) -> therefore Metrify(marinna, arleta) Metrify(marinna, arleta) and forall x (Metrify(x, arleta) -> not Forty(x)) -> therefore not Forty(marinna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The kirbee does not need the derrek. The derrek citify the loleta. The loleta mismate the kirbee. If something citify the kirbee and it does not need the derrek then the derrek citify the kirbee. If something citify the kirbee then it is not lucent. If something citify the loleta then the loleta citify the kirbee. The loleta is lucent.", "logic": "\nnot Mismate(kirbee, derrek)\nCitify(derrek, loleta)\nMismate(loleta, kirbee)\nforall x (Citify(x, kirbee) and not Mismate(x, derrek) -> Citify(derrek, kirbee))\nforall x (Citify(x, kirbee) -> not Lucent(x))\nforall x (Citify(x, loleta) -> Citify(loleta, kirbee))\n\nLucent(loleta)\n\nCitify(derrek, loleta) and forall x (Citify(x, loleta) -> Citify(loleta, kirbee)) -> therefore Citify(loleta, kirbee) Citify(loleta, kirbee) and forall x (Citify(x, kirbee) -> not Lucent(x)) -> therefore not Lucent(loleta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The chaunce does not need the roni. The roni automatise the geraldina. The geraldina vilipend the chaunce. If something automatise the chaunce and it does not need the roni then the roni automatise the chaunce. If something automatise the chaunce then it is not anchoritic. If something automatise the geraldina then the geraldina automatise the chaunce. The roni does not like the chaunce.", "logic": "\nnot Vilipend(chaunce, roni)\nAutomatise(roni, geraldina)\nVilipend(geraldina, chaunce)\nforall x (Automatise(x, chaunce) and not Vilipend(x, roni) -> Automatise(roni, chaunce))\nforall x (Automatise(x, chaunce) -> not Anchoritic(x))\nforall x (Automatise(x, geraldina) -> Automatise(geraldina, chaunce))\n\nnot Automatise(roni, chaunce)\n\nforall x (Automatise(x, chaunce) and not Vilipend(x, roni) -> Automatise(roni, chaunce)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The hew does not need the renel. The renel decline the doll. The doll sort the hew. If something decline the hew and it does not need the renel then the renel decline the hew. If something decline the hew then it is not chimerical. If something decline the doll then the doll decline the hew. The hew sort the hew.", "logic": "\nnot Sort(hew, renel)\nDecline(renel, doll)\nSort(doll, hew)\nforall x (Decline(x, hew) and not Sort(x, renel) -> Decline(renel, hew))\nforall x (Decline(x, hew) -> not Chimerical(x))\nforall x (Decline(x, doll) -> Decline(doll, hew))\n\nSort(hew, hew)\n\nSort(hew, hew) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The edee does not need the cayla. The cayla loll the delphine. The delphine debone the edee. If something loll the edee and it does not need the cayla then the cayla loll the edee. If something loll the edee then it is not basilican. If something loll the delphine then the delphine loll the edee. The cayla does not need the cayla.", "logic": "\nnot Debone(edee, cayla)\nLoll(cayla, delphine)\nDebone(delphine, edee)\nforall x (Loll(x, edee) and not Debone(x, cayla) -> Loll(cayla, edee))\nforall x (Loll(x, edee) -> not Basilican(x))\nforall x (Loll(x, delphine) -> Loll(delphine, edee))\n\nnot Debone(cayla, cayla)\n\nnot Debone(cayla, cayla) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The mandi does not need the eliza. The eliza digitalize the ailyn. The ailyn ferment the mandi. If something digitalize the mandi and it does not need the eliza then the eliza digitalize the mandi. If something digitalize the mandi then it is not semipublic. If something digitalize the ailyn then the ailyn digitalize the mandi. The eliza chases the mandi.", "logic": "\nnot Ferment(mandi, eliza)\nDigitalize(eliza, ailyn)\nFerment(ailyn, mandi)\nforall x (Digitalize(x, mandi) and not Ferment(x, eliza) -> Digitalize(eliza, mandi))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, mandi) -> not Semipublic(x))\nforall x (Digitalize(x, ailyn) -> Digitalize(ailyn, mandi))\n\nChases(eliza, mandi)\n\nChases(eliza, mandi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The jessi does not need the debbie. The debbie umpire the cyrillus. The cyrillus unburden the jessi. If something umpire the jessi and it does not need the debbie then the debbie umpire the jessi. If something umpire the jessi then it is not scrimy. If something umpire the cyrillus then the cyrillus umpire the jessi. The jessi does not like the cyrillus.", "logic": "\nnot Unburden(jessi, debbie)\nUmpire(debbie, cyrillus)\nUnburden(cyrillus, jessi)\nforall x (Umpire(x, jessi) and not Unburden(x, debbie) -> Umpire(debbie, jessi))\nforall x (Umpire(x, jessi) -> not Scrimy(x))\nforall x (Umpire(x, cyrillus) -> Umpire(cyrillus, jessi))\n\nnot Umpire(jessi, cyrillus)\n\nnot Umpire(jessi, cyrillus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "The bellina does not need the orion. The orion crump the kalli. The kalli manacle the bellina. If something crump the bellina and it does not need the orion then the orion crump the bellina. If something crump the bellina then it is not anginal. If something crump the kalli then the kalli crump the bellina. The kalli chases the orion.", "logic": "\nnot Manacle(bellina, orion)\nCrump(orion, kalli)\nManacle(kalli, bellina)\nforall x (Crump(x, bellina) and not Manacle(x, orion) -> Crump(orion, bellina))\nforall x (Crump(x, bellina) -> not Anginal(x))\nforall x (Crump(x, kalli) -> Crump(kalli, bellina))\n\nChases(kalli, orion)\n\nChases(kalli, orion) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-625"} {"premises": "Dot is accurst. Natalia is basined. Natalia is not unaccepted. Natalia is barefooted. Denys is not elicited. Denys is basined. Denys is not accurst. Young people are assertive. Red people are reformable. Quiet, elicited people are not reformable. All elicited, assertive people are barefooted. If Dot is basined then Dot is elicited. Young, assertive people are elicited. Natalia is not unaccepted.", "logic": "\nAccurst(dot)\nBasined(natalia)\nnot Unaccepted(natalia)\nBarefooted(natalia)\nnot Elicited(denys)\nBasined(denys)\nnot Accurst(denys)\nforall x (Barefooted(x) -> Assertive(x))\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) -> Reformable(x))\nforall x (Basined(x) and Elicited(x) -> not Reformable(x))\nforall x (Elicited(x) and Assertive(x) -> Barefooted(x))\nBasined(dot) -> Elicited(dot)\nforall x (Barefooted(x) and Assertive(x) -> Elicited(x))\n\nnot Unaccepted(natalia)\n\ntherefore not Unaccepted(natalia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Adiana is horny. Mickie is voluntary. Mickie is not phalangeal. Mickie is mycenaean. Deena is not preceding. Deena is voluntary. Deena is not horny. Young people are matching. Red people are bilabiate. Quiet, preceding people are not bilabiate. All preceding, matching people are mycenaean. If Adiana is voluntary then Adiana is preceding. Young, matching people are preceding. Mickie is not voluntary.", "logic": "\nHorny(adiana)\nVoluntary(mickie)\nnot Phalangeal(mickie)\nMycenaean(mickie)\nnot Preceding(deena)\nVoluntary(deena)\nnot Horny(deena)\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Matching(x))\nforall x (Phalangeal(x) -> Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Voluntary(x) and Preceding(x) -> not Bilabiate(x))\nforall x (Preceding(x) and Matching(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nVoluntary(adiana) -> Preceding(adiana)\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Matching(x) -> Preceding(x))\n\nnot Voluntary(mickie)\n\ntherefore Voluntary(mickie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Marci is undeserved. Bryna is cycloidal. Bryna is not telepathic. Bryna is addible. Carlota is not gutsy. Carlota is cycloidal. Carlota is not undeserved. Young people are peltate. Red people are prisonlike. Quiet, gutsy people are not prisonlike. All gutsy, peltate people are addible. If Marci is cycloidal then Marci is gutsy. Young, peltate people are gutsy. Bryna is peltate.", "logic": "\nUndeserved(marci)\nCycloidal(bryna)\nnot Telepathic(bryna)\nAddible(bryna)\nnot Gutsy(carlota)\nCycloidal(carlota)\nnot Undeserved(carlota)\nforall x (Addible(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Telepathic(x) -> Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Cycloidal(x) and Gutsy(x) -> not Prisonlike(x))\nforall x (Gutsy(x) and Peltate(x) -> Addible(x))\nCycloidal(marci) -> Gutsy(marci)\nforall x (Addible(x) and Peltate(x) -> Gutsy(x))\n\nPeltate(bryna)\n\nAddible(bryna) and forall x (Addible(x) -> Peltate(x)) -> therefore Peltate(bryna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Hadley is cozy. Melinde is phenomenal. Melinde is not prevalent. Melinde is lusterless. Marci is not pasteurian. Marci is phenomenal. Marci is not cozy. Young people are glittery. Red people are pelagic. Quiet, pasteurian people are not pelagic. All pasteurian, glittery people are lusterless. If Hadley is phenomenal then Hadley is pasteurian. Young, glittery people are pasteurian. Melinde is not glittery.", "logic": "\nCozy(hadley)\nPhenomenal(melinde)\nnot Prevalent(melinde)\nLusterless(melinde)\nnot Pasteurian(marci)\nPhenomenal(marci)\nnot Cozy(marci)\nforall x (Lusterless(x) -> Glittery(x))\nforall x (Prevalent(x) -> Pelagic(x))\nforall x (Phenomenal(x) and Pasteurian(x) -> not Pelagic(x))\nforall x (Pasteurian(x) and Glittery(x) -> Lusterless(x))\nPhenomenal(hadley) -> Pasteurian(hadley)\nforall x (Lusterless(x) and Glittery(x) -> Pasteurian(x))\n\nnot Glittery(melinde)\n\nLusterless(melinde) and forall x (Lusterless(x) -> Glittery(x)) -> therefore Glittery(melinde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Karilynn is circular. Nikita is inactive. Nikita is not gauche. Nikita is compelling. Vida is not unseemly. Vida is inactive. Vida is not circular. Young people are debasing. Red people are planktonic. Quiet, unseemly people are not planktonic. All unseemly, debasing people are compelling. If Karilynn is inactive then Karilynn is unseemly. Young, debasing people are unseemly. Nikita is unseemly.", "logic": "\nCircular(karilynn)\nInactive(nikita)\nnot Gauche(nikita)\nCompelling(nikita)\nnot Unseemly(vida)\nInactive(vida)\nnot Circular(vida)\nforall x (Compelling(x) -> Debasing(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Planktonic(x))\nforall x (Inactive(x) and Unseemly(x) -> not Planktonic(x))\nforall x (Unseemly(x) and Debasing(x) -> Compelling(x))\nInactive(karilynn) -> Unseemly(karilynn)\nforall x (Compelling(x) and Debasing(x) -> Unseemly(x))\n\nUnseemly(nikita)\n\nCompelling(nikita) and forall x (Compelling(x) -> Debasing(x)) -> therefore Debasing(nikita) Compelling(nikita) and Debasing(nikita) and forall x (Compelling(x) and Debasing(x) -> Unseemly(x)) -> therefore Unseemly(nikita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Samuela is carolean. Ava is dexterous. Ava is not revived. Ava is regressive. Karlotta is not unobvious. Karlotta is dexterous. Karlotta is not carolean. Young people are lvii. Red people are rheumy. Quiet, unobvious people are not rheumy. All unobvious, lvii people are regressive. If Samuela is dexterous then Samuela is unobvious. Young, lvii people are unobvious. Ava is not unobvious.", "logic": "\nCarolean(samuela)\nDexterous(ava)\nnot Revived(ava)\nRegressive(ava)\nnot Unobvious(karlotta)\nDexterous(karlotta)\nnot Carolean(karlotta)\nforall x (Regressive(x) -> Lvii(x))\nforall x (Revived(x) -> Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Dexterous(x) and Unobvious(x) -> not Rheumy(x))\nforall x (Unobvious(x) and Lvii(x) -> Regressive(x))\nDexterous(samuela) -> Unobvious(samuela)\nforall x (Regressive(x) and Lvii(x) -> Unobvious(x))\n\nnot Unobvious(ava)\n\nRegressive(ava) and forall x (Regressive(x) -> Lvii(x)) -> therefore Lvii(ava) Regressive(ava) and Lvii(ava) and forall x (Regressive(x) and Lvii(x) -> Unobvious(x)) -> therefore Unobvious(ava)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Stephenie is wheeled. Sebastien is baritone. Sebastien is not shapeless. Sebastien is stiff. Ingelbert is not grasslike. Ingelbert is baritone. Ingelbert is not wheeled. Young people are dopy. Red people are untitled. Quiet, grasslike people are not untitled. All grasslike, dopy people are stiff. If Stephenie is baritone then Stephenie is grasslike. Young, dopy people are grasslike. Sebastien is not untitled.", "logic": "\nWheeled(stephenie)\nBaritone(sebastien)\nnot Shapeless(sebastien)\nStiff(sebastien)\nnot Grasslike(ingelbert)\nBaritone(ingelbert)\nnot Wheeled(ingelbert)\nforall x (Stiff(x) -> Dopy(x))\nforall x (Shapeless(x) -> Untitled(x))\nforall x (Baritone(x) and Grasslike(x) -> not Untitled(x))\nforall x (Grasslike(x) and Dopy(x) -> Stiff(x))\nBaritone(stephenie) -> Grasslike(stephenie)\nforall x (Stiff(x) and Dopy(x) -> Grasslike(x))\n\nnot Untitled(sebastien)\n\nStiff(sebastien) and forall x (Stiff(x) -> Dopy(x)) -> therefore Dopy(sebastien) Stiff(sebastien) and Dopy(sebastien) and forall x (Stiff(x) and Dopy(x) -> Grasslike(x)) -> therefore Grasslike(sebastien) Baritone(sebastien) and Grasslike(sebastien) and forall x (Baritone(x) and Grasslike(x) -> not Untitled(x)) -> therefore not Untitled(sebastien)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Julio is socialist. Bradley is derisory. Bradley is not pianissimo. Bradley is normal. Justina is not cheating. Justina is derisory. Justina is not socialist. Young people are protracted. Red people are going. Quiet, cheating people are not going. All cheating, protracted people are normal. If Julio is derisory then Julio is cheating. Young, protracted people are cheating. Bradley is going.", "logic": "\nSocialist(julio)\nDerisory(bradley)\nnot Pianissimo(bradley)\nNormal(bradley)\nnot Cheating(justina)\nDerisory(justina)\nnot Socialist(justina)\nforall x (Normal(x) -> Protracted(x))\nforall x (Pianissimo(x) -> Going(x))\nforall x (Derisory(x) and Cheating(x) -> not Going(x))\nforall x (Cheating(x) and Protracted(x) -> Normal(x))\nDerisory(julio) -> Cheating(julio)\nforall x (Normal(x) and Protracted(x) -> Cheating(x))\n\nGoing(bradley)\n\nNormal(bradley) and forall x (Normal(x) -> Protracted(x)) -> therefore Protracted(bradley) Normal(bradley) and Protracted(bradley) and forall x (Normal(x) and Protracted(x) -> Cheating(x)) -> therefore Cheating(bradley) Derisory(bradley) and Cheating(bradley) and forall x (Derisory(x) and Cheating(x) -> not Going(x)) -> therefore not Going(bradley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Dianna is saxatile. Nonna is crannied. Nonna is not pimpled. Nonna is levorotary. Danit is not elderly. Danit is crannied. Danit is not saxatile. Young people are extensive. Red people are topless. Quiet, elderly people are not topless. All elderly, extensive people are levorotary. If Dianna is crannied then Dianna is elderly. Young, extensive people are elderly. Danit is not extensive.", "logic": "\nSaxatile(dianna)\nCrannied(nonna)\nnot Pimpled(nonna)\nLevorotary(nonna)\nnot Elderly(danit)\nCrannied(danit)\nnot Saxatile(danit)\nforall x (Levorotary(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Pimpled(x) -> Topless(x))\nforall x (Crannied(x) and Elderly(x) -> not Topless(x))\nforall x (Elderly(x) and Extensive(x) -> Levorotary(x))\nCrannied(dianna) -> Elderly(dianna)\nforall x (Levorotary(x) and Extensive(x) -> Elderly(x))\n\nnot Extensive(danit)\n\nforall x (Levorotary(x) -> Extensive(x)) <- forall x (Elderly(x) and Extensive(x) -> Levorotary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Charleen is regardless. Tommie is juvenile. Tommie is not ajar. Tommie is neat. Gallagher is not furious. Gallagher is juvenile. Gallagher is not regardless. Young people are symbiotic. Red people are unbowed. Quiet, furious people are not unbowed. All furious, symbiotic people are neat. If Charleen is juvenile then Charleen is furious. Young, symbiotic people are furious. Gallagher is neat.", "logic": "\nRegardless(charleen)\nJuvenile(tommie)\nnot Ajar(tommie)\nNeat(tommie)\nnot Furious(gallagher)\nJuvenile(gallagher)\nnot Regardless(gallagher)\nforall x (Neat(x) -> Symbiotic(x))\nforall x (Ajar(x) -> Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Juvenile(x) and Furious(x) -> not Unbowed(x))\nforall x (Furious(x) and Symbiotic(x) -> Neat(x))\nJuvenile(charleen) -> Furious(charleen)\nforall x (Neat(x) and Symbiotic(x) -> Furious(x))\n\nNeat(gallagher)\n\nforall x (Furious(x) and Symbiotic(x) -> Neat(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Felice is sorrowing. Gretna is unfree. Gretna is not highbrowed. Gretna is disdainful. Friedric is not rotund. Friedric is unfree. Friedric is not sorrowing. Young people are snoopy. Red people are adsorptive. Quiet, rotund people are not adsorptive. All rotund, snoopy people are disdainful. If Felice is unfree then Felice is rotund. Young, snoopy people are rotund. Felice is not disdainful.", "logic": "\nSorrowing(felice)\nUnfree(gretna)\nnot Highbrowed(gretna)\nDisdainful(gretna)\nnot Rotund(friedric)\nUnfree(friedric)\nnot Sorrowing(friedric)\nforall x (Disdainful(x) -> Snoopy(x))\nforall x (Highbrowed(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Unfree(x) and Rotund(x) -> not Adsorptive(x))\nforall x (Rotund(x) and Snoopy(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nUnfree(felice) -> Rotund(felice)\nforall x (Disdainful(x) and Snoopy(x) -> Rotund(x))\n\nnot Disdainful(felice)\n\nforall x (Rotund(x) and Snoopy(x) -> Disdainful(x)) <- Unfree(felice) -> Rotund(felice) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Dino is dangerous. Dulciana is sadistic. Dulciana is not fatal. Dulciana is bald. Brit is not slumbery. Brit is sadistic. Brit is not dangerous. Young people are windblown. Red people are aggregate. Quiet, slumbery people are not aggregate. All slumbery, windblown people are bald. If Dino is sadistic then Dino is slumbery. Young, windblown people are slumbery. Dino is windblown.", "logic": "\nDangerous(dino)\nSadistic(dulciana)\nnot Fatal(dulciana)\nBald(dulciana)\nnot Slumbery(brit)\nSadistic(brit)\nnot Dangerous(brit)\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Windblown(x))\nforall x (Fatal(x) -> Aggregate(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Slumbery(x) -> not Aggregate(x))\nforall x (Slumbery(x) and Windblown(x) -> Bald(x))\nSadistic(dino) -> Slumbery(dino)\nforall x (Bald(x) and Windblown(x) -> Slumbery(x))\n\nWindblown(dino)\n\nforall x (Bald(x) -> Windblown(x)) <- forall x (Slumbery(x) and Windblown(x) -> Bald(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Clotilda is solvent. Frans is endovenous. Frans is not offended. Frans is craved. Jessi is not subaquatic. Jessi is endovenous. Jessi is not solvent. Young people are arbitrable. Red people are prime. Quiet, subaquatic people are not prime. All subaquatic, arbitrable people are craved. If Clotilda is endovenous then Clotilda is subaquatic. Young, arbitrable people are subaquatic. Clotilda is not endovenous.", "logic": "\nSolvent(clotilda)\nEndovenous(frans)\nnot Offended(frans)\nCraved(frans)\nnot Subaquatic(jessi)\nEndovenous(jessi)\nnot Solvent(jessi)\nforall x (Craved(x) -> Arbitrable(x))\nforall x (Offended(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Endovenous(x) and Subaquatic(x) -> not Prime(x))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) and Arbitrable(x) -> Craved(x))\nEndovenous(clotilda) -> Subaquatic(clotilda)\nforall x (Craved(x) and Arbitrable(x) -> Subaquatic(x))\n\nnot Endovenous(clotilda)\n\nnot Endovenous(clotilda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Lolande is unbalanced. Robbie is monecious. Robbie is not brut. Robbie is lovesome. Dorthy is not anechoic. Dorthy is monecious. Dorthy is not unbalanced. Young people are wary. Red people are comic. Quiet, anechoic people are not comic. All anechoic, wary people are lovesome. If Lolande is monecious then Lolande is anechoic. Young, wary people are anechoic. Dorthy is brut.", "logic": "\nUnbalanced(lolande)\nMonecious(robbie)\nnot Brut(robbie)\nLovesome(robbie)\nnot Anechoic(dorthy)\nMonecious(dorthy)\nnot Unbalanced(dorthy)\nforall x (Lovesome(x) -> Wary(x))\nforall x (Brut(x) -> Comic(x))\nforall x (Monecious(x) and Anechoic(x) -> not Comic(x))\nforall x (Anechoic(x) and Wary(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nMonecious(lolande) -> Anechoic(lolande)\nforall x (Lovesome(x) and Wary(x) -> Anechoic(x))\n\nBrut(dorthy)\n\nBrut(dorthy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Sascha is composed. Adria is sulphuric. Adria is not theoretic. Adria is dolabrate. Carlo is not swanky. Carlo is sulphuric. Carlo is not composed. Young people are schizoid. Red people are subocean. Quiet, swanky people are not subocean. All swanky, schizoid people are dolabrate. If Sascha is sulphuric then Sascha is swanky. Young, schizoid people are swanky. Adria is not composed.", "logic": "\nComposed(sascha)\nSulphuric(adria)\nnot Theoretic(adria)\nDolabrate(adria)\nnot Swanky(carlo)\nSulphuric(carlo)\nnot Composed(carlo)\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) -> Schizoid(x))\nforall x (Theoretic(x) -> Subocean(x))\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) and Swanky(x) -> not Subocean(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Dolabrate(x))\nSulphuric(sascha) -> Swanky(sascha)\nforall x (Dolabrate(x) and Schizoid(x) -> Swanky(x))\n\nnot Composed(adria)\n\nnot Composed(adria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Lucinda is hominal. Penelopa is elflike. Penelopa is not portuguese. Penelopa is euphonical. Demetri is not legged. Demetri is elflike. Demetri is not hominal. Young people are treacly. Red people are antifungal. Quiet, legged people are not antifungal. All legged, treacly people are euphonical. If Lucinda is elflike then Lucinda is legged. Young, treacly people are legged. Lucinda is portuguese.", "logic": "\nHominal(lucinda)\nElflike(penelopa)\nnot Portuguese(penelopa)\nEuphonical(penelopa)\nnot Legged(demetri)\nElflike(demetri)\nnot Hominal(demetri)\nforall x (Euphonical(x) -> Treacly(x))\nforall x (Portuguese(x) -> Antifungal(x))\nforall x (Elflike(x) and Legged(x) -> not Antifungal(x))\nforall x (Legged(x) and Treacly(x) -> Euphonical(x))\nElflike(lucinda) -> Legged(lucinda)\nforall x (Euphonical(x) and Treacly(x) -> Legged(x))\n\nPortuguese(lucinda)\n\nPortuguese(lucinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-351"} {"premises": "Chastity is obese. If Chastity is obese then Chastity is swell. All swell people are sickish. If Chastity is dissenting then Chastity is obese. Quiet people are untactful. If Chastity is swell and Chastity is sickish then Chastity is studied. If Chastity is untactful and Chastity is not obese then Chastity is sickish. Red people are tortious. All untactful people are tortious. Chastity is obese.", "logic": "\nObese(chastity)\nObese(chastity) -> Swell(chastity)\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Sickish(x))\nDissenting(chastity) -> Obese(chastity)\nforall x (Studied(x) -> Untactful(x))\nSwell(chastity) and Sickish(chastity) -> Studied(chastity)\nUntactful(chastity) and not Obese(chastity) -> Sickish(chastity)\nforall x (Swell(x) -> Tortious(x))\nforall x (Untactful(x) -> Tortious(x))\n\nObese(chastity)\n\ntherefore Obese(chastity)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Selig is vindictive. If Selig is vindictive then Selig is unagitated. All unagitated people are thirtieth. If Selig is disabling then Selig is vindictive. Quiet people are unhinged. If Selig is unagitated and Selig is thirtieth then Selig is unbeloved. If Selig is unhinged and Selig is not vindictive then Selig is thirtieth. Red people are corneous. All unhinged people are corneous. Selig is not vindictive.", "logic": "\nVindictive(selig)\nVindictive(selig) -> Unagitated(selig)\nforall x (Unagitated(x) -> Thirtieth(x))\nDisabling(selig) -> Vindictive(selig)\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) -> Unhinged(x))\nUnagitated(selig) and Thirtieth(selig) -> Unbeloved(selig)\nUnhinged(selig) and not Vindictive(selig) -> Thirtieth(selig)\nforall x (Unagitated(x) -> Corneous(x))\nforall x (Unhinged(x) -> Corneous(x))\n\nnot Vindictive(selig)\n\ntherefore Vindictive(selig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Sindee is leaved. If Sindee is leaved then Sindee is spoilt. All spoilt people are electoral. If Sindee is unwavering then Sindee is leaved. Quiet people are creamy. If Sindee is spoilt and Sindee is electoral then Sindee is postictal. If Sindee is creamy and Sindee is not leaved then Sindee is electoral. Red people are studded. All creamy people are studded. Sindee is spoilt.", "logic": "\nLeaved(sindee)\nLeaved(sindee) -> Spoilt(sindee)\nforall x (Spoilt(x) -> Electoral(x))\nUnwavering(sindee) -> Leaved(sindee)\nforall x (Postictal(x) -> Creamy(x))\nSpoilt(sindee) and Electoral(sindee) -> Postictal(sindee)\nCreamy(sindee) and not Leaved(sindee) -> Electoral(sindee)\nforall x (Spoilt(x) -> Studded(x))\nforall x (Creamy(x) -> Studded(x))\n\nSpoilt(sindee)\n\nLeaved(sindee) and Leaved(sindee) -> Spoilt(sindee) -> therefore Spoilt(sindee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Meira is disrupted. If Meira is disrupted then Meira is caitiff. All caitiff people are unmolested. If Meira is posted then Meira is disrupted. Quiet people are equable. If Meira is caitiff and Meira is unmolested then Meira is snide. If Meira is equable and Meira is not disrupted then Meira is unmolested. Red people are lusitanian. All equable people are lusitanian. Meira is not caitiff.", "logic": "\nDisrupted(meira)\nDisrupted(meira) -> Caitiff(meira)\nforall x (Caitiff(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nPosted(meira) -> Disrupted(meira)\nforall x (Snide(x) -> Equable(x))\nCaitiff(meira) and Unmolested(meira) -> Snide(meira)\nEquable(meira) and not Disrupted(meira) -> Unmolested(meira)\nforall x (Caitiff(x) -> Lusitanian(x))\nforall x (Equable(x) -> Lusitanian(x))\n\nnot Caitiff(meira)\n\nDisrupted(meira) and Disrupted(meira) -> Caitiff(meira) -> therefore Caitiff(meira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Jandy is barefoot. If Jandy is barefoot then Jandy is robotlike. All robotlike people are specific. If Jandy is edentulate then Jandy is barefoot. Quiet people are gratifying. If Jandy is robotlike and Jandy is specific then Jandy is sibilant. If Jandy is gratifying and Jandy is not barefoot then Jandy is specific. Red people are easy. All gratifying people are easy. Jandy is easy.", "logic": "\nBarefoot(jandy)\nBarefoot(jandy) -> Robotlike(jandy)\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Specific(x))\nEdentulate(jandy) -> Barefoot(jandy)\nforall x (Sibilant(x) -> Gratifying(x))\nRobotlike(jandy) and Specific(jandy) -> Sibilant(jandy)\nGratifying(jandy) and not Barefoot(jandy) -> Specific(jandy)\nforall x (Robotlike(x) -> Easy(x))\nforall x (Gratifying(x) -> Easy(x))\n\nEasy(jandy)\n\nBarefoot(jandy) and Barefoot(jandy) -> Robotlike(jandy) -> therefore Robotlike(jandy) Robotlike(jandy) and forall x (Robotlike(x) -> Easy(x)) -> therefore Easy(jandy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Ansell is tremendous. If Ansell is tremendous then Ansell is caseous. All caseous people are groveling. If Ansell is autacoidal then Ansell is tremendous. Quiet people are unstudied. If Ansell is caseous and Ansell is groveling then Ansell is brief. If Ansell is unstudied and Ansell is not tremendous then Ansell is groveling. Red people are stressful. All unstudied people are stressful. Ansell is not groveling.", "logic": "\nTremendous(ansell)\nTremendous(ansell) -> Caseous(ansell)\nforall x (Caseous(x) -> Groveling(x))\nAutacoidal(ansell) -> Tremendous(ansell)\nforall x (Brief(x) -> Unstudied(x))\nCaseous(ansell) and Groveling(ansell) -> Brief(ansell)\nUnstudied(ansell) and not Tremendous(ansell) -> Groveling(ansell)\nforall x (Caseous(x) -> Stressful(x))\nforall x (Unstudied(x) -> Stressful(x))\n\nnot Groveling(ansell)\n\nTremendous(ansell) and Tremendous(ansell) -> Caseous(ansell) -> therefore Caseous(ansell) Caseous(ansell) and forall x (Caseous(x) -> Groveling(x)) -> therefore Groveling(ansell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Quigly is epical. If Quigly is epical then Quigly is immature. All immature people are windblown. If Quigly is universal then Quigly is epical. Quiet people are untenanted. If Quigly is immature and Quigly is windblown then Quigly is geodesic. If Quigly is untenanted and Quigly is not epical then Quigly is windblown. Red people are mysophobic. All untenanted people are mysophobic. Quigly is geodesic.", "logic": "\nEpical(quigly)\nEpical(quigly) -> Immature(quigly)\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Windblown(x))\nUniversal(quigly) -> Epical(quigly)\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Untenanted(x))\nImmature(quigly) and Windblown(quigly) -> Geodesic(quigly)\nUntenanted(quigly) and not Epical(quigly) -> Windblown(quigly)\nforall x (Immature(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Untenanted(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\n\nGeodesic(quigly)\n\nEpical(quigly) and Epical(quigly) -> Immature(quigly) -> therefore Immature(quigly) Epical(quigly) and Epical(quigly) -> Immature(quigly) -> therefore Immature(quigly) Immature(quigly) and forall x (Immature(x) -> Windblown(x)) -> therefore Windblown(quigly) Immature(quigly) and Windblown(quigly) and Immature(quigly) and Windblown(quigly) -> Geodesic(quigly) -> therefore Geodesic(quigly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Kristos is denuded. If Kristos is denuded then Kristos is mongoloid. All mongoloid people are cutaneous. If Kristos is rumanian then Kristos is denuded. Quiet people are dowered. If Kristos is mongoloid and Kristos is cutaneous then Kristos is fiducial. If Kristos is dowered and Kristos is not denuded then Kristos is cutaneous. Red people are chary. All dowered people are chary. Kristos is not fiducial.", "logic": "\nDenuded(kristos)\nDenuded(kristos) -> Mongoloid(kristos)\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Cutaneous(x))\nRumanian(kristos) -> Denuded(kristos)\nforall x (Fiducial(x) -> Dowered(x))\nMongoloid(kristos) and Cutaneous(kristos) -> Fiducial(kristos)\nDowered(kristos) and not Denuded(kristos) -> Cutaneous(kristos)\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Chary(x))\nforall x (Dowered(x) -> Chary(x))\n\nnot Fiducial(kristos)\n\nDenuded(kristos) and Denuded(kristos) -> Mongoloid(kristos) -> therefore Mongoloid(kristos) Denuded(kristos) and Denuded(kristos) -> Mongoloid(kristos) -> therefore Mongoloid(kristos) Mongoloid(kristos) and forall x (Mongoloid(x) -> Cutaneous(x)) -> therefore Cutaneous(kristos) Mongoloid(kristos) and Cutaneous(kristos) and Mongoloid(kristos) and Cutaneous(kristos) -> Fiducial(kristos) -> therefore Fiducial(kristos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-658"} {"premises": "Dulcinea is paradisaic. Dulcinea is formidable. Dulcinea is sardonic. Hortense is paradisaic. Hortense is formidable. Hortense is unfriendly. Editha is pyogenic. Rough people are sardonic. If someone is formidable and unfriendly then they are divided. Smart, unfriendly people are nubby. Dulcinea is paradisaic.", "logic": "\nParadisaic(dulcinea)\nFormidable(dulcinea)\nSardonic(dulcinea)\nParadisaic(hortense)\nFormidable(hortense)\nUnfriendly(hortense)\nPyogenic(editha)\nforall x (Divided(x) -> Sardonic(x))\nforall x (Formidable(x) and Unfriendly(x) -> Divided(x))\nforall x (Sardonic(x) and Unfriendly(x) -> Nubby(x))\n\nParadisaic(dulcinea)\n\ntherefore Paradisaic(dulcinea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Jim is propitious. Jim is immoveable. Jim is scurvy. Larissa is propitious. Larissa is immoveable. Larissa is honest. Appolonia is spineless. Rough people are scurvy. If someone is immoveable and honest then they are spanking. Smart, honest people are accentual. Larissa is not propitious.", "logic": "\nPropitious(jim)\nImmoveable(jim)\nScurvy(jim)\nPropitious(larissa)\nImmoveable(larissa)\nHonest(larissa)\nSpineless(appolonia)\nforall x (Spanking(x) -> Scurvy(x))\nforall x (Immoveable(x) and Honest(x) -> Spanking(x))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and Honest(x) -> Accentual(x))\n\nnot Propitious(larissa)\n\ntherefore Propitious(larissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Ebony is formal. Ebony is unkempt. Ebony is comely. Grata is formal. Grata is unkempt. Grata is manky. Edouard is crested. Rough people are comely. If someone is unkempt and manky then they are towering. Smart, manky people are advisory. Grata is towering.", "logic": "\nFormal(ebony)\nUnkempt(ebony)\nComely(ebony)\nFormal(grata)\nUnkempt(grata)\nManky(grata)\nCrested(edouard)\nforall x (Towering(x) -> Comely(x))\nforall x (Unkempt(x) and Manky(x) -> Towering(x))\nforall x (Comely(x) and Manky(x) -> Advisory(x))\n\nTowering(grata)\n\nUnkempt(grata) and Manky(grata) and forall x (Unkempt(x) and Manky(x) -> Towering(x)) -> therefore Towering(grata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Korella is opposite. Korella is brawny. Korella is illusional. Fiorenze is opposite. Fiorenze is brawny. Fiorenze is untaxed. Tedmund is maximal. Rough people are illusional. If someone is brawny and untaxed then they are adjective. Smart, untaxed people are vascular. Fiorenze is not adjective.", "logic": "\nOpposite(korella)\nBrawny(korella)\nIllusional(korella)\nOpposite(fiorenze)\nBrawny(fiorenze)\nUntaxed(fiorenze)\nMaximal(tedmund)\nforall x (Adjective(x) -> Illusional(x))\nforall x (Brawny(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Adjective(x))\nforall x (Illusional(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Vascular(x))\n\nnot Adjective(fiorenze)\n\nBrawny(fiorenze) and Untaxed(fiorenze) and forall x (Brawny(x) and Untaxed(x) -> Adjective(x)) -> therefore Adjective(fiorenze)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Jeth is refulgent. Jeth is propulsive. Jeth is bothered. Dunc is refulgent. Dunc is propulsive. Dunc is lateral. Lockwood is infallible. Rough people are bothered. If someone is propulsive and lateral then they are nonwoody. Smart, lateral people are unangry. Dunc is bothered.", "logic": "\nRefulgent(jeth)\nPropulsive(jeth)\nBothered(jeth)\nRefulgent(dunc)\nPropulsive(dunc)\nLateral(dunc)\nInfallible(lockwood)\nforall x (Nonwoody(x) -> Bothered(x))\nforall x (Propulsive(x) and Lateral(x) -> Nonwoody(x))\nforall x (Bothered(x) and Lateral(x) -> Unangry(x))\n\nBothered(dunc)\n\nPropulsive(dunc) and Lateral(dunc) and forall x (Propulsive(x) and Lateral(x) -> Nonwoody(x)) -> therefore Nonwoody(dunc) Nonwoody(dunc) and forall x (Nonwoody(x) -> Bothered(x)) -> therefore Bothered(dunc)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Fox is initiative. Fox is rumanian. Fox is ironed. Latia is initiative. Latia is rumanian. Latia is aberdonian. Ilise is creepy. Rough people are ironed. If someone is rumanian and aberdonian then they are seafaring. Smart, aberdonian people are spartan. Latia is not ironed.", "logic": "\nInitiative(fox)\nRumanian(fox)\nIroned(fox)\nInitiative(latia)\nRumanian(latia)\nAberdonian(latia)\nCreepy(ilise)\nforall x (Seafaring(x) -> Ironed(x))\nforall x (Rumanian(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Seafaring(x))\nforall x (Ironed(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Spartan(x))\n\nnot Ironed(latia)\n\nRumanian(latia) and Aberdonian(latia) and forall x (Rumanian(x) and Aberdonian(x) -> Seafaring(x)) -> therefore Seafaring(latia) Seafaring(latia) and forall x (Seafaring(x) -> Ironed(x)) -> therefore Ironed(latia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Vonni is blowzy. Vonni is unexacting. Vonni is tannish. Angel is blowzy. Angel is unexacting. Angel is eastward. Eran is regnant. Rough people are tannish. If someone is unexacting and eastward then they are magical. Smart, eastward people are forbidden. Angel is forbidden.", "logic": "\nBlowzy(vonni)\nUnexacting(vonni)\nTannish(vonni)\nBlowzy(angel)\nUnexacting(angel)\nEastward(angel)\nRegnant(eran)\nforall x (Magical(x) -> Tannish(x))\nforall x (Unexacting(x) and Eastward(x) -> Magical(x))\nforall x (Tannish(x) and Eastward(x) -> Forbidden(x))\n\nForbidden(angel)\n\nUnexacting(angel) and Eastward(angel) and forall x (Unexacting(x) and Eastward(x) -> Magical(x)) -> therefore Magical(angel) Magical(angel) and forall x (Magical(x) -> Tannish(x)) -> therefore Tannish(angel) Tannish(angel) and Eastward(angel) and forall x (Tannish(x) and Eastward(x) -> Forbidden(x)) -> therefore Forbidden(angel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Beowulf is engorged. Beowulf is segregated. Beowulf is tickling. Chadwick is engorged. Chadwick is segregated. Chadwick is melodious. Dori is mnemonic. Rough people are tickling. If someone is segregated and melodious then they are colored. Smart, melodious people are cumbrous. Chadwick is not cumbrous.", "logic": "\nEngorged(beowulf)\nSegregated(beowulf)\nTickling(beowulf)\nEngorged(chadwick)\nSegregated(chadwick)\nMelodious(chadwick)\nMnemonic(dori)\nforall x (Colored(x) -> Tickling(x))\nforall x (Segregated(x) and Melodious(x) -> Colored(x))\nforall x (Tickling(x) and Melodious(x) -> Cumbrous(x))\n\nnot Cumbrous(chadwick)\n\nSegregated(chadwick) and Melodious(chadwick) and forall x (Segregated(x) and Melodious(x) -> Colored(x)) -> therefore Colored(chadwick) Colored(chadwick) and forall x (Colored(x) -> Tickling(x)) -> therefore Tickling(chadwick) Tickling(chadwick) and Melodious(chadwick) and forall x (Tickling(x) and Melodious(x) -> Cumbrous(x)) -> therefore Cumbrous(chadwick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Kent is seamless. Kent is uncool. Kent is intoxicant. Lucienne is seamless. Lucienne is uncool. Lucienne is edgy. Latrena is overcast. Rough people are intoxicant. If someone is uncool and edgy then they are convenient. Smart, edgy people are smokeless. Latrena is not intoxicant.", "logic": "\nSeamless(kent)\nUncool(kent)\nIntoxicant(kent)\nSeamless(lucienne)\nUncool(lucienne)\nEdgy(lucienne)\nOvercast(latrena)\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Intoxicant(x))\nforall x (Uncool(x) and Edgy(x) -> Convenient(x))\nforall x (Intoxicant(x) and Edgy(x) -> Smokeless(x))\n\nnot Intoxicant(latrena)\n\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Intoxicant(x)) <- forall x (Uncool(x) and Edgy(x) -> Convenient(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Pennie is brief. Pennie is gaunt. Pennie is peroneal. Janot is brief. Janot is gaunt. Janot is delinquent. Damita is prying. Rough people are peroneal. If someone is gaunt and delinquent then they are invalid. Smart, delinquent people are haphazard. Pennie is invalid.", "logic": "\nBrief(pennie)\nGaunt(pennie)\nPeroneal(pennie)\nBrief(janot)\nGaunt(janot)\nDelinquent(janot)\nPrying(damita)\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Peroneal(x))\nforall x (Gaunt(x) and Delinquent(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Peroneal(x) and Delinquent(x) -> Haphazard(x))\n\nInvalid(pennie)\n\nforall x (Gaunt(x) and Delinquent(x) -> Invalid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Chelsie is consummate. Chelsie is unique. Chelsie is crafty. Josie is consummate. Josie is unique. Josie is optional. Wilmar is unmoving. Rough people are crafty. If someone is unique and optional then they are sellable. Smart, optional people are gelded. Wilmar is not gelded.", "logic": "\nConsummate(chelsie)\nUnique(chelsie)\nCrafty(chelsie)\nConsummate(josie)\nUnique(josie)\nOptional(josie)\nUnmoving(wilmar)\nforall x (Sellable(x) -> Crafty(x))\nforall x (Unique(x) and Optional(x) -> Sellable(x))\nforall x (Crafty(x) and Optional(x) -> Gelded(x))\n\nnot Gelded(wilmar)\n\nforall x (Crafty(x) and Optional(x) -> Gelded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Saul is unnoted. Saul is verified. Saul is mechanic. Tyne is unnoted. Tyne is verified. Tyne is implacable. Mufinella is garbled. Rough people are mechanic. If someone is verified and implacable then they are timed. Smart, implacable people are resolute. Saul is resolute.", "logic": "\nUnnoted(saul)\nVerified(saul)\nMechanic(saul)\nUnnoted(tyne)\nVerified(tyne)\nImplacable(tyne)\nGarbled(mufinella)\nforall x (Timed(x) -> Mechanic(x))\nforall x (Verified(x) and Implacable(x) -> Timed(x))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) and Implacable(x) -> Resolute(x))\n\nResolute(saul)\n\nforall x (Mechanic(x) and Implacable(x) -> Resolute(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Ender is incapable. Ender is offish. Ender is consenting. Robinia is incapable. Robinia is offish. Robinia is tenuous. Susannah is disheveled. Rough people are consenting. If someone is offish and tenuous then they are mothproof. Smart, tenuous people are streaming. Susannah is not offish.", "logic": "\nIncapable(ender)\nOffish(ender)\nConsenting(ender)\nIncapable(robinia)\nOffish(robinia)\nTenuous(robinia)\nDisheveled(susannah)\nforall x (Mothproof(x) -> Consenting(x))\nforall x (Offish(x) and Tenuous(x) -> Mothproof(x))\nforall x (Consenting(x) and Tenuous(x) -> Streaming(x))\n\nnot Offish(susannah)\n\nnot Offish(susannah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Kelsy is allylic. Kelsy is amiable. Kelsy is tutelary. Waldo is allylic. Waldo is amiable. Waldo is gonzo. Meg is befogged. Rough people are tutelary. If someone is amiable and gonzo then they are pelvic. Smart, gonzo people are gutsy. Waldo is befogged.", "logic": "\nAllylic(kelsy)\nAmiable(kelsy)\nTutelary(kelsy)\nAllylic(waldo)\nAmiable(waldo)\nGonzo(waldo)\nBefogged(meg)\nforall x (Pelvic(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Amiable(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Pelvic(x))\nforall x (Tutelary(x) and Gonzo(x) -> Gutsy(x))\n\nBefogged(waldo)\n\nBefogged(waldo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Jeannine is astral. Jeannine is trembling. Jeannine is nescient. Berkeley is astral. Berkeley is trembling. Berkeley is unsheathed. Nathaniel is erasable. Rough people are nescient. If someone is trembling and unsheathed then they are ascetic. Smart, unsheathed people are industrial. Jeannine is not erasable.", "logic": "\nAstral(jeannine)\nTrembling(jeannine)\nNescient(jeannine)\nAstral(berkeley)\nTrembling(berkeley)\nUnsheathed(berkeley)\nErasable(nathaniel)\nforall x (Ascetic(x) -> Nescient(x))\nforall x (Trembling(x) and Unsheathed(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nforall x (Nescient(x) and Unsheathed(x) -> Industrial(x))\n\nnot Erasable(jeannine)\n\nnot Erasable(jeannine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Karsten is albanian. Karsten is bolshevik. Karsten is primary. Sydel is albanian. Sydel is bolshevik. Sydel is phagocytic. Kendrick is concordant. Rough people are primary. If someone is bolshevik and phagocytic then they are picky. Smart, phagocytic people are dioestrous. Karsten is phagocytic.", "logic": "\nAlbanian(karsten)\nBolshevik(karsten)\nPrimary(karsten)\nAlbanian(sydel)\nBolshevik(sydel)\nPhagocytic(sydel)\nConcordant(kendrick)\nforall x (Picky(x) -> Primary(x))\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) and Phagocytic(x) -> Picky(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) and Phagocytic(x) -> Dioestrous(x))\n\nPhagocytic(karsten)\n\nPhagocytic(karsten) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1516"} {"premises": "Carlyle is netted. Emylee is percussive. Salomo is opportune. Ozzy is bilobate. All opportune people are unruly. Nice people are opportune. Emylee is percussive.", "logic": "\nNetted(carlyle)\nPercussive(emylee)\nOpportune(salomo)\nBilobate(ozzy)\nforall x (Opportune(x) -> Unruly(x))\nforall x (Netted(x) -> Opportune(x))\n\nPercussive(emylee)\n\ntherefore Percussive(emylee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Tre is rear. Janus is branchiate. Val is alternate. Netty is squinty. All alternate people are defiled. Nice people are alternate. Val is not alternate.", "logic": "\nRear(tre)\nBranchiate(janus)\nAlternate(val)\nSquinty(netty)\nforall x (Alternate(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Rear(x) -> Alternate(x))\n\nnot Alternate(val)\n\ntherefore Alternate(val)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Garold is kosher. Mina is niggardly. Mattheus is unsated. Alberta is dexterous. All unsated people are unwarmed. Nice people are unsated. Mattheus is unwarmed.", "logic": "\nKosher(garold)\nNiggardly(mina)\nUnsated(mattheus)\nDexterous(alberta)\nforall x (Unsated(x) -> Unwarmed(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Unsated(x))\n\nUnwarmed(mattheus)\n\nUnsated(mattheus) and forall x (Unsated(x) -> Unwarmed(x)) -> therefore Unwarmed(mattheus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Phyllida is bladed. Garvin is reasoned. Kingston is uncharged. Renault is terse. All uncharged people are sugarless. Nice people are uncharged. Kingston is not sugarless.", "logic": "\nBladed(phyllida)\nReasoned(garvin)\nUncharged(kingston)\nTerse(renault)\nforall x (Uncharged(x) -> Sugarless(x))\nforall x (Bladed(x) -> Uncharged(x))\n\nnot Sugarless(kingston)\n\nUncharged(kingston) and forall x (Uncharged(x) -> Sugarless(x)) -> therefore Sugarless(kingston)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Vassily is hyperopic. Isobel is pilous. Megen is vehement. Elric is bankable. All vehement people are disquieted. Nice people are vehement. Vassily is disquieted.", "logic": "\nHyperopic(vassily)\nPilous(isobel)\nVehement(megen)\nBankable(elric)\nforall x (Vehement(x) -> Disquieted(x))\nforall x (Hyperopic(x) -> Vehement(x))\n\nDisquieted(vassily)\n\nHyperopic(vassily) and forall x (Hyperopic(x) -> Vehement(x)) -> therefore Vehement(vassily) Vehement(vassily) and forall x (Vehement(x) -> Disquieted(x)) -> therefore Disquieted(vassily)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Sher is prenominal. Bevvy is evidenced. Sophey is visored. Michal is nonplused. All visored people are operatic. Nice people are visored. Sher is not operatic.", "logic": "\nPrenominal(sher)\nEvidenced(bevvy)\nVisored(sophey)\nNonplused(michal)\nforall x (Visored(x) -> Operatic(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Visored(x))\n\nnot Operatic(sher)\n\nPrenominal(sher) and forall x (Prenominal(x) -> Visored(x)) -> therefore Visored(sher) Visored(sher) and forall x (Visored(x) -> Operatic(x)) -> therefore Operatic(sher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Marthena is zambian. Nicolina is errhine. Zorro is jesuitic. Saunder is unchanging. All jesuitic people are alimental. Nice people are jesuitic. Saunder is not jesuitic.", "logic": "\nZambian(marthena)\nErrhine(nicolina)\nJesuitic(zorro)\nUnchanging(saunder)\nforall x (Jesuitic(x) -> Alimental(x))\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Jesuitic(x))\n\nnot Jesuitic(saunder)\n\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Jesuitic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Lanna is homoecious. Matias is capacitive. Dawna is stubbly. Rudie is lone. All stubbly people are fervid. Nice people are stubbly. Rudie is fervid.", "logic": "\nHomoecious(lanna)\nCapacitive(matias)\nStubbly(dawna)\nLone(rudie)\nforall x (Stubbly(x) -> Fervid(x))\nforall x (Homoecious(x) -> Stubbly(x))\n\nFervid(rudie)\n\nforall x (Stubbly(x) -> Fervid(x)) <- forall x (Homoecious(x) -> Stubbly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Arlie is unplayful. Orlando is bearable. Win is pacifist. Ewart is christian. All pacifist people are antrorse. Nice people are pacifist. Orlando is not pacifist.", "logic": "\nUnplayful(arlie)\nBearable(orlando)\nPacifist(win)\nChristian(ewart)\nforall x (Pacifist(x) -> Antrorse(x))\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Pacifist(x))\n\nnot Pacifist(orlando)\n\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Pacifist(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Silvie is humbled. Vina is jejune. Eliza is slovakian. Coleman is staunch. All slovakian people are lamblike. Nice people are slovakian. Silvie is jejune.", "logic": "\nHumbled(silvie)\nJejune(vina)\nSlovakian(eliza)\nStaunch(coleman)\nforall x (Slovakian(x) -> Lamblike(x))\nforall x (Humbled(x) -> Slovakian(x))\n\nJejune(silvie)\n\nJejune(silvie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Jemimah is merciless. Almira is combustive. Meridith is ahorse. Sharyl is spic. All ahorse people are falcate. Nice people are ahorse. Sharyl is not green.", "logic": "\nMerciless(jemimah)\nCombustive(almira)\nAhorse(meridith)\nSpic(sharyl)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Falcate(x))\nforall x (Merciless(x) -> Ahorse(x))\n\nnot Green(sharyl)\n\nnot Green(sharyl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Onlea is shirty. Georgia is accepted. Ari is awakened. Angeline is paschal. All awakened people are extraneous. Nice people are awakened. Angeline is shirty.", "logic": "\nShirty(onlea)\nAccepted(georgia)\nAwakened(ari)\nPaschal(angeline)\nforall x (Awakened(x) -> Extraneous(x))\nforall x (Shirty(x) -> Awakened(x))\n\nShirty(angeline)\n\nShirty(angeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1260"} {"premises": "Way is verbatim. Way is cognisable. Way is asiatic. Way is intrepid. Way is ultimate. Way is faux. Way is rocklike. Julianne is verbatim. Julianne is asiatic. Julianne is intrepid. Julianne is faux. Julianne is rocklike. Quiet, cognisable people are ultimate. All faux, verbatim people are cognisable. Julianne is intrepid.", "logic": "\nVerbatim(way)\nCognisable(way)\nAsiatic(way)\nIntrepid(way)\nUltimate(way)\nFaux(way)\nRocklike(way)\nVerbatim(julianne)\nAsiatic(julianne)\nIntrepid(julianne)\nFaux(julianne)\nRocklike(julianne)\nforall x (Asiatic(x) and Cognisable(x) -> Ultimate(x))\nforall x (Faux(x) and Verbatim(x) -> Cognisable(x))\n\nIntrepid(julianne)\n\ntherefore Intrepid(julianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Caro is mercenary. Caro is sinhala. Caro is beaming. Caro is invariant. Caro is undoable. Caro is semite. Caro is pietistic. Normand is mercenary. Normand is beaming. Normand is invariant. Normand is semite. Normand is pietistic. Quiet, sinhala people are undoable. All semite, mercenary people are sinhala. Caro is not beaming.", "logic": "\nMercenary(caro)\nSinhala(caro)\nBeaming(caro)\nInvariant(caro)\nUndoable(caro)\nSemite(caro)\nPietistic(caro)\nMercenary(normand)\nBeaming(normand)\nInvariant(normand)\nSemite(normand)\nPietistic(normand)\nforall x (Beaming(x) and Sinhala(x) -> Undoable(x))\nforall x (Semite(x) and Mercenary(x) -> Sinhala(x))\n\nnot Beaming(caro)\n\ntherefore Beaming(caro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Lynette is nisi. Lynette is unendowed. Lynette is impromptu. Lynette is sixteenth. Lynette is untidy. Lynette is unhampered. Lynette is straying. Royal is nisi. Royal is impromptu. Royal is sixteenth. Royal is unhampered. Royal is straying. Quiet, unendowed people are untidy. All unhampered, nisi people are unendowed. Royal is unendowed.", "logic": "\nNisi(lynette)\nUnendowed(lynette)\nImpromptu(lynette)\nSixteenth(lynette)\nUntidy(lynette)\nUnhampered(lynette)\nStraying(lynette)\nNisi(royal)\nImpromptu(royal)\nSixteenth(royal)\nUnhampered(royal)\nStraying(royal)\nforall x (Impromptu(x) and Unendowed(x) -> Untidy(x))\nforall x (Unhampered(x) and Nisi(x) -> Unendowed(x))\n\nUnendowed(royal)\n\nUnhampered(royal) and Nisi(royal) and forall x (Unhampered(x) and Nisi(x) -> Unendowed(x)) -> therefore Unendowed(royal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Doug is yeatsian. Doug is prompt. Doug is punctured. Doug is stringent. Doug is kittenish. Doug is denatured. Doug is mesophytic. Roseline is yeatsian. Roseline is punctured. Roseline is stringent. Roseline is denatured. Roseline is mesophytic. Quiet, prompt people are kittenish. All denatured, yeatsian people are prompt. Roseline is not prompt.", "logic": "\nYeatsian(doug)\nPrompt(doug)\nPunctured(doug)\nStringent(doug)\nKittenish(doug)\nDenatured(doug)\nMesophytic(doug)\nYeatsian(roseline)\nPunctured(roseline)\nStringent(roseline)\nDenatured(roseline)\nMesophytic(roseline)\nforall x (Punctured(x) and Prompt(x) -> Kittenish(x))\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Yeatsian(x) -> Prompt(x))\n\nnot Prompt(roseline)\n\nDenatured(roseline) and Yeatsian(roseline) and forall x (Denatured(x) and Yeatsian(x) -> Prompt(x)) -> therefore Prompt(roseline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Ally is scurvy. Ally is shelled. Ally is pseudo. Ally is cursory. Ally is citrous. Ally is applied. Ally is ablaze. Armstrong is scurvy. Armstrong is pseudo. Armstrong is cursory. Armstrong is applied. Armstrong is ablaze. Quiet, shelled people are citrous. All applied, scurvy people are shelled. Armstrong is citrous.", "logic": "\nScurvy(ally)\nShelled(ally)\nPseudo(ally)\nCursory(ally)\nCitrous(ally)\nApplied(ally)\nAblaze(ally)\nScurvy(armstrong)\nPseudo(armstrong)\nCursory(armstrong)\nApplied(armstrong)\nAblaze(armstrong)\nforall x (Pseudo(x) and Shelled(x) -> Citrous(x))\nforall x (Applied(x) and Scurvy(x) -> Shelled(x))\n\nCitrous(armstrong)\n\nApplied(armstrong) and Scurvy(armstrong) and forall x (Applied(x) and Scurvy(x) -> Shelled(x)) -> therefore Shelled(armstrong) Pseudo(armstrong) and Shelled(armstrong) and forall x (Pseudo(x) and Shelled(x) -> Citrous(x)) -> therefore Citrous(armstrong)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Thorndike is agaze. Thorndike is daisylike. Thorndike is immense. Thorndike is genteel. Thorndike is useful. Thorndike is donnean. Thorndike is abroach. Prince is agaze. Prince is immense. Prince is genteel. Prince is donnean. Prince is abroach. Quiet, daisylike people are useful. All donnean, agaze people are daisylike. Prince is not useful.", "logic": "\nAgaze(thorndike)\nDaisylike(thorndike)\nImmense(thorndike)\nGenteel(thorndike)\nUseful(thorndike)\nDonnean(thorndike)\nAbroach(thorndike)\nAgaze(prince)\nImmense(prince)\nGenteel(prince)\nDonnean(prince)\nAbroach(prince)\nforall x (Immense(x) and Daisylike(x) -> Useful(x))\nforall x (Donnean(x) and Agaze(x) -> Daisylike(x))\n\nnot Useful(prince)\n\nDonnean(prince) and Agaze(prince) and forall x (Donnean(x) and Agaze(x) -> Daisylike(x)) -> therefore Daisylike(prince) Immense(prince) and Daisylike(prince) and forall x (Immense(x) and Daisylike(x) -> Useful(x)) -> therefore Useful(prince)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-38"} {"premises": "Kerrie is wrothful. Kerrie is not jihadi. Kerrie is delicate. Kerrie is tetragonal. Flory is wrothful. Flory is copacetic. Flory is not jihadi. Flory is delicate. Flory is torrid. Krystle is not geared. Krystle is wrothful. Krystle is not copacetic. Krystle is jihadi. Krystle is delicate. Krystle is not torrid. Krystle is not tetragonal. If something is copacetic then it is geared. If something is tetragonal then it is delicate. All copacetic things are delicate. If something is copacetic and geared then it is wrothful. If Krystle is torrid then Krystle is tetragonal. If something is copacetic and not jihadi then it is torrid. If Krystle is torrid and Krystle is copacetic then Krystle is not wrothful. If Kerrie is geared and Kerrie is not torrid then Kerrie is not wrothful. Flory is copacetic.", "logic": "\nWrothful(kerrie)\nnot Jihadi(kerrie)\nDelicate(kerrie)\nTetragonal(kerrie)\nWrothful(flory)\nCopacetic(flory)\nnot Jihadi(flory)\nDelicate(flory)\nTorrid(flory)\nnot Geared(krystle)\nWrothful(krystle)\nnot Copacetic(krystle)\nJihadi(krystle)\nDelicate(krystle)\nnot Torrid(krystle)\nnot Tetragonal(krystle)\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Geared(x))\nforall x (Tetragonal(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) and Geared(x) -> Wrothful(x))\nTorrid(krystle) -> Tetragonal(krystle)\nforall x (Copacetic(x) and not Jihadi(x) -> Torrid(x))\nTorrid(krystle) and Copacetic(krystle) -> not Wrothful(krystle)\nGeared(kerrie) and not Torrid(kerrie) -> not Wrothful(kerrie)\n\nCopacetic(flory)\n\ntherefore Copacetic(flory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6880"} {"premises": "Lissa is unicameral. Lissa is not testicular. Lissa is according. Lissa is expansible. Teodorico is unicameral. Teodorico is orchestral. Teodorico is not testicular. Teodorico is according. Teodorico is exogenous. Astrid is not italian. Astrid is unicameral. Astrid is not orchestral. Astrid is testicular. Astrid is according. Astrid is not exogenous. Astrid is not expansible. If something is orchestral then it is italian. If something is expansible then it is according. All orchestral things are according. If something is orchestral and italian then it is unicameral. If Astrid is exogenous then Astrid is expansible. If something is orchestral and not testicular then it is exogenous. If Astrid is exogenous and Astrid is orchestral then Astrid is not unicameral. If Lissa is italian and Lissa is not exogenous then Lissa is not unicameral. Lissa is not unicameral.", "logic": "\nUnicameral(lissa)\nnot Testicular(lissa)\nAccording(lissa)\nExpansible(lissa)\nUnicameral(teodorico)\nOrchestral(teodorico)\nnot Testicular(teodorico)\nAccording(teodorico)\nExogenous(teodorico)\nnot Italian(astrid)\nUnicameral(astrid)\nnot Orchestral(astrid)\nTesticular(astrid)\nAccording(astrid)\nnot Exogenous(astrid)\nnot Expansible(astrid)\nforall x (Orchestral(x) -> Italian(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> According(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) -> According(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and Italian(x) -> Unicameral(x))\nExogenous(astrid) -> Expansible(astrid)\nforall x (Orchestral(x) and not Testicular(x) -> Exogenous(x))\nExogenous(astrid) and Orchestral(astrid) -> not Unicameral(astrid)\nItalian(lissa) and not Exogenous(lissa) -> not Unicameral(lissa)\n\nnot Unicameral(lissa)\n\ntherefore Unicameral(lissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6880"} {"premises": "Marian is gibbose. Marian is not elflike. Marian is irksome. Marian is general. Sherwood is gibbose. Sherwood is femoral. Sherwood is not elflike. Sherwood is irksome. Sherwood is consenting. Quint is not just. Quint is gibbose. Quint is not femoral. Quint is elflike. Quint is irksome. Quint is not consenting. Quint is not general. If something is femoral then it is just. If something is general then it is irksome. All femoral things are irksome. If something is femoral and just then it is gibbose. If Quint is consenting then Quint is general. If something is femoral and not elflike then it is consenting. If Quint is consenting and Quint is femoral then Quint is not gibbose. If Marian is just and Marian is not consenting then Marian is not gibbose. Marian is not just.", "logic": "\nGibbose(marian)\nnot Elflike(marian)\nIrksome(marian)\nGeneral(marian)\nGibbose(sherwood)\nFemoral(sherwood)\nnot Elflike(sherwood)\nIrksome(sherwood)\nConsenting(sherwood)\nnot Just(quint)\nGibbose(quint)\nnot Femoral(quint)\nElflike(quint)\nIrksome(quint)\nnot Consenting(quint)\nnot General(quint)\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Just(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Irksome(x))\nforall x (Femoral(x) and Just(x) -> Gibbose(x))\nConsenting(quint) -> General(quint)\nforall x (Femoral(x) and not Elflike(x) -> Consenting(x))\nConsenting(quint) and Femoral(quint) -> not Gibbose(quint)\nJust(marian) and not Consenting(marian) -> not Gibbose(marian)\n\nnot Just(marian)\n\nforall x (Femoral(x) -> Just(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6880"} {"premises": "Alanna is exilic. Alanna is not excused. Alanna is planned. Alanna is pathogenic. Rafaelia is exilic. Rafaelia is chylous. Rafaelia is not excused. Rafaelia is planned. Rafaelia is ridged. Ishmael is not horned. Ishmael is exilic. Ishmael is not chylous. Ishmael is excused. Ishmael is planned. Ishmael is not ridged. Ishmael is not pathogenic. If something is chylous then it is horned. If something is pathogenic then it is planned. All chylous things are planned. If something is chylous and horned then it is exilic. If Ishmael is ridged then Ishmael is pathogenic. If something is chylous and not excused then it is ridged. If Ishmael is ridged and Ishmael is chylous then Ishmael is not exilic. If Alanna is horned and Alanna is not ridged then Alanna is not exilic. Alanna is chylous.", "logic": "\nExilic(alanna)\nnot Excused(alanna)\nPlanned(alanna)\nPathogenic(alanna)\nExilic(rafaelia)\nChylous(rafaelia)\nnot Excused(rafaelia)\nPlanned(rafaelia)\nRidged(rafaelia)\nnot Horned(ishmael)\nExilic(ishmael)\nnot Chylous(ishmael)\nExcused(ishmael)\nPlanned(ishmael)\nnot Ridged(ishmael)\nnot Pathogenic(ishmael)\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Horned(x))\nforall x (Pathogenic(x) -> Planned(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Planned(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) and Horned(x) -> Exilic(x))\nRidged(ishmael) -> Pathogenic(ishmael)\nforall x (Chylous(x) and not Excused(x) -> Ridged(x))\nRidged(ishmael) and Chylous(ishmael) -> not Exilic(ishmael)\nHorned(alanna) and not Ridged(alanna) -> not Exilic(alanna)\n\nChylous(alanna)\n\nChylous(alanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6880"} {"premises": "Don is threatened. Andrew is assertable. Barbee is threatened. If something is inexpiable then it is pupal. All assertable, pupal things are apologetic. Furry, assertable things are not apologetic. All assertable things are inexpiable. If Barbee is assertable and Barbee is apologetic then Barbee is threatened. All assertable, threatened things are isolated. Barbee is threatened.", "logic": "\nThreatened(don)\nAssertable(andrew)\nThreatened(barbee)\nforall x (Inexpiable(x) -> Pupal(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) and Pupal(x) -> Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Onerous(x) and Assertable(x) -> not Apologetic(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Inexpiable(x))\nAssertable(barbee) and Apologetic(barbee) -> Threatened(barbee)\nforall x (Assertable(x) and Threatened(x) -> Isolated(x))\n\nThreatened(barbee)\n\ntherefore Threatened(barbee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Jobi is unpompous. Titos is sulfurized. Freemon is unpompous. If something is brute then it is ribbonlike. All sulfurized, ribbonlike things are bellied. Furry, sulfurized things are not bellied. All sulfurized things are brute. If Freemon is sulfurized and Freemon is bellied then Freemon is unpompous. All sulfurized, unpompous things are powerless. Jobi is not unpompous.", "logic": "\nUnpompous(jobi)\nSulfurized(titos)\nUnpompous(freemon)\nforall x (Brute(x) -> Ribbonlike(x))\nforall x (Sulfurized(x) and Ribbonlike(x) -> Bellied(x))\nforall x (Unshelled(x) and Sulfurized(x) -> not Bellied(x))\nforall x (Sulfurized(x) -> Brute(x))\nSulfurized(freemon) and Bellied(freemon) -> Unpompous(freemon)\nforall x (Sulfurized(x) and Unpompous(x) -> Powerless(x))\n\nnot Unpompous(jobi)\n\ntherefore Unpompous(jobi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Haywood is cusped. Ariela is sovereign. Raf is cusped. If something is sluicing then it is judicable. All sovereign, judicable things are stifled. Furry, sovereign things are not stifled. All sovereign things are sluicing. If Raf is sovereign and Raf is stifled then Raf is cusped. All sovereign, cusped things are lovable. Ariela is sluicing.", "logic": "\nCusped(haywood)\nSovereign(ariela)\nCusped(raf)\nforall x (Sluicing(x) -> Judicable(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Judicable(x) -> Stifled(x))\nforall x (Ironed(x) and Sovereign(x) -> not Stifled(x))\nforall x (Sovereign(x) -> Sluicing(x))\nSovereign(raf) and Stifled(raf) -> Cusped(raf)\nforall x (Sovereign(x) and Cusped(x) -> Lovable(x))\n\nSluicing(ariela)\n\nSovereign(ariela) and forall x (Sovereign(x) -> Sluicing(x)) -> therefore Sluicing(ariela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Ilka is latent. Thorndike is farfetched. Ashly is latent. If something is styptic then it is riant. All farfetched, riant things are mural. Furry, farfetched things are not mural. All farfetched things are styptic. If Ashly is farfetched and Ashly is mural then Ashly is latent. All farfetched, latent things are omissive. Thorndike is not styptic.", "logic": "\nLatent(ilka)\nFarfetched(thorndike)\nLatent(ashly)\nforall x (Styptic(x) -> Riant(x))\nforall x (Farfetched(x) and Riant(x) -> Mural(x))\nforall x (Forty(x) and Farfetched(x) -> not Mural(x))\nforall x (Farfetched(x) -> Styptic(x))\nFarfetched(ashly) and Mural(ashly) -> Latent(ashly)\nforall x (Farfetched(x) and Latent(x) -> Omissive(x))\n\nnot Styptic(thorndike)\n\nFarfetched(thorndike) and forall x (Farfetched(x) -> Styptic(x)) -> therefore Styptic(thorndike)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Ardenia is curative. Cloris is shona. Agnola is curative. If something is bibless then it is vigorous. All shona, vigorous things are intragroup. Furry, shona things are not intragroup. All shona things are bibless. If Agnola is shona and Agnola is intragroup then Agnola is curative. All shona, curative things are funereal. Cloris is vigorous.", "logic": "\nCurative(ardenia)\nShona(cloris)\nCurative(agnola)\nforall x (Bibless(x) -> Vigorous(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) and Vigorous(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Suspected(x) and Shona(x) -> not Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Shona(x) -> Bibless(x))\nShona(agnola) and Intragroup(agnola) -> Curative(agnola)\nforall x (Shona(x) and Curative(x) -> Funereal(x))\n\nVigorous(cloris)\n\nShona(cloris) and forall x (Shona(x) -> Bibless(x)) -> therefore Bibless(cloris) Bibless(cloris) and forall x (Bibless(x) -> Vigorous(x)) -> therefore Vigorous(cloris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Debora is afeard. Natasha is sectarian. Jessie is afeard. If something is protrusile then it is usable. All sectarian, usable things are numeric. Furry, sectarian things are not numeric. All sectarian things are protrusile. If Jessie is sectarian and Jessie is numeric then Jessie is afeard. All sectarian, afeard things are gingival. Natasha is not usable.", "logic": "\nAfeard(debora)\nSectarian(natasha)\nAfeard(jessie)\nforall x (Protrusile(x) -> Usable(x))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) and Usable(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Liveborn(x) and Sectarian(x) -> not Numeric(x))\nforall x (Sectarian(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nSectarian(jessie) and Numeric(jessie) -> Afeard(jessie)\nforall x (Sectarian(x) and Afeard(x) -> Gingival(x))\n\nnot Usable(natasha)\n\nSectarian(natasha) and forall x (Sectarian(x) -> Protrusile(x)) -> therefore Protrusile(natasha) Protrusile(natasha) and forall x (Protrusile(x) -> Usable(x)) -> therefore Usable(natasha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Rozalie is trilateral. Filippa is thirteenth. Zena is trilateral. If something is slashing then it is english. All thirteenth, english things are temporary. Furry, thirteenth things are not temporary. All thirteenth things are slashing. If Zena is thirteenth and Zena is temporary then Zena is trilateral. All thirteenth, trilateral things are aboveboard. Filippa is temporary.", "logic": "\nTrilateral(rozalie)\nThirteenth(filippa)\nTrilateral(zena)\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> English(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and English(x) -> Temporary(x))\nforall x (Offsides(x) and Thirteenth(x) -> not Temporary(x))\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) -> Slashing(x))\nThirteenth(zena) and Temporary(zena) -> Trilateral(zena)\nforall x (Thirteenth(x) and Trilateral(x) -> Aboveboard(x))\n\nTemporary(filippa)\n\nThirteenth(filippa) and forall x (Thirteenth(x) -> Slashing(x)) -> therefore Slashing(filippa) Slashing(filippa) and forall x (Slashing(x) -> English(x)) -> therefore English(filippa) Thirteenth(filippa) and English(filippa) and forall x (Thirteenth(x) and English(x) -> Temporary(x)) -> therefore Temporary(filippa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Samuella is estuarial. Stafford is lacrimal. Blinnie is estuarial. If something is biyearly then it is catchpenny. All lacrimal, catchpenny things are boolean. Furry, lacrimal things are not boolean. All lacrimal things are biyearly. If Blinnie is lacrimal and Blinnie is boolean then Blinnie is estuarial. All lacrimal, estuarial things are curvaceous. Stafford is not boolean.", "logic": "\nEstuarial(samuella)\nLacrimal(stafford)\nEstuarial(blinnie)\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> Catchpenny(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Catchpenny(x) -> Boolean(x))\nforall x (Brownish(x) and Lacrimal(x) -> not Boolean(x))\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nLacrimal(blinnie) and Boolean(blinnie) -> Estuarial(blinnie)\nforall x (Lacrimal(x) and Estuarial(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\n\nnot Boolean(stafford)\n\nLacrimal(stafford) and forall x (Lacrimal(x) -> Biyearly(x)) -> therefore Biyearly(stafford) Biyearly(stafford) and forall x (Biyearly(x) -> Catchpenny(x)) -> therefore Catchpenny(stafford) Lacrimal(stafford) and Catchpenny(stafford) and forall x (Lacrimal(x) and Catchpenny(x) -> Boolean(x)) -> therefore Boolean(stafford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Crysta is cushy. Lotty is miry. Renee is cushy. If something is haggard then it is cismontane. All miry, cismontane things are voltaic. Furry, miry things are not voltaic. All miry things are haggard. If Renee is miry and Renee is voltaic then Renee is cushy. All miry, cushy things are ecumenic. Renee is not haggard.", "logic": "\nCushy(crysta)\nMiry(lotty)\nCushy(renee)\nforall x (Haggard(x) -> Cismontane(x))\nforall x (Miry(x) and Cismontane(x) -> Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Atavistic(x) and Miry(x) -> not Voltaic(x))\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Haggard(x))\nMiry(renee) and Voltaic(renee) -> Cushy(renee)\nforall x (Miry(x) and Cushy(x) -> Ecumenic(x))\n\nnot Haggard(renee)\n\nforall x (Miry(x) -> Haggard(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Granville is carpal. Kin is jerky. Woody is carpal. If something is altruistic then it is annulate. All jerky, annulate things are politic. Furry, jerky things are not politic. All jerky things are altruistic. If Woody is jerky and Woody is politic then Woody is carpal. All jerky, carpal things are lidless. Granville is annulate.", "logic": "\nCarpal(granville)\nJerky(kin)\nCarpal(woody)\nforall x (Altruistic(x) -> Annulate(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) and Annulate(x) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) and Jerky(x) -> not Politic(x))\nforall x (Jerky(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nJerky(woody) and Politic(woody) -> Carpal(woody)\nforall x (Jerky(x) and Carpal(x) -> Lidless(x))\n\nAnnulate(granville)\n\nforall x (Altruistic(x) -> Annulate(x)) <- forall x (Jerky(x) -> Altruistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Aristotle is prevalent. Nikolai is togolese. Katya is prevalent. If something is scraggly then it is disliked. All togolese, disliked things are flush. Furry, togolese things are not flush. All togolese things are scraggly. If Katya is togolese and Katya is flush then Katya is prevalent. All togolese, prevalent things are uncombined. Katya is not uncombined.", "logic": "\nPrevalent(aristotle)\nTogolese(nikolai)\nPrevalent(katya)\nforall x (Scraggly(x) -> Disliked(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) and Disliked(x) -> Flush(x))\nforall x (Monoploid(x) and Togolese(x) -> not Flush(x))\nforall x (Togolese(x) -> Scraggly(x))\nTogolese(katya) and Flush(katya) -> Prevalent(katya)\nforall x (Togolese(x) and Prevalent(x) -> Uncombined(x))\n\nnot Uncombined(katya)\n\nforall x (Togolese(x) and Prevalent(x) -> Uncombined(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Daile is tasmanian. Adora is undrawn. Lola is tasmanian. If something is jade then it is boon. All undrawn, boon things are unseamed. Furry, undrawn things are not unseamed. All undrawn things are jade. If Lola is undrawn and Lola is unseamed then Lola is tasmanian. All undrawn, tasmanian things are unoiled. Lola is unseamed.", "logic": "\nTasmanian(daile)\nUndrawn(adora)\nTasmanian(lola)\nforall x (Jade(x) -> Boon(x))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Boon(x) -> Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Buckshee(x) and Undrawn(x) -> not Unseamed(x))\nforall x (Undrawn(x) -> Jade(x))\nUndrawn(lola) and Unseamed(lola) -> Tasmanian(lola)\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Tasmanian(x) -> Unoiled(x))\n\nUnseamed(lola)\n\nforall x (Undrawn(x) and Boon(x) -> Unseamed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Sofia is deadpan. Kaylee is metalloid. Madeline is deadpan. If something is fulgid then it is fair. All metalloid, fair things are avowed. Furry, metalloid things are not avowed. All metalloid things are fulgid. If Madeline is metalloid and Madeline is avowed then Madeline is deadpan. All metalloid, deadpan things are essene. Madeline is not devious.", "logic": "\nDeadpan(sofia)\nMetalloid(kaylee)\nDeadpan(madeline)\nforall x (Fulgid(x) -> Fair(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Fair(x) -> Avowed(x))\nforall x (Devious(x) and Metalloid(x) -> not Avowed(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Fulgid(x))\nMetalloid(madeline) and Avowed(madeline) -> Deadpan(madeline)\nforall x (Metalloid(x) and Deadpan(x) -> Essene(x))\n\nnot Devious(madeline)\n\nnot Devious(madeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Ceil is brutish. Sidnee is disturbed. Frans is brutish. If something is coccygeal then it is pretorial. All disturbed, pretorial things are breakable. Furry, disturbed things are not breakable. All disturbed things are coccygeal. If Frans is disturbed and Frans is breakable then Frans is brutish. All disturbed, brutish things are vitrified. Frans is disturbed.", "logic": "\nBrutish(ceil)\nDisturbed(sidnee)\nBrutish(frans)\nforall x (Coccygeal(x) -> Pretorial(x))\nforall x (Disturbed(x) and Pretorial(x) -> Breakable(x))\nforall x (Leftish(x) and Disturbed(x) -> not Breakable(x))\nforall x (Disturbed(x) -> Coccygeal(x))\nDisturbed(frans) and Breakable(frans) -> Brutish(frans)\nforall x (Disturbed(x) and Brutish(x) -> Vitrified(x))\n\nDisturbed(frans)\n\nDisturbed(frans) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Harvey is steep. Ruperto is barbecued. Sydelle is steep. If something is phoenician then it is expandible. All barbecued, expandible things are inside. Furry, barbecued things are not inside. All barbecued things are phoenician. If Sydelle is barbecued and Sydelle is inside then Sydelle is steep. All barbecued, steep things are revengeful. Ruperto is not alienated.", "logic": "\nSteep(harvey)\nBarbecued(ruperto)\nSteep(sydelle)\nforall x (Phoenician(x) -> Expandible(x))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) and Expandible(x) -> Inside(x))\nforall x (Alienated(x) and Barbecued(x) -> not Inside(x))\nforall x (Barbecued(x) -> Phoenician(x))\nBarbecued(sydelle) and Inside(sydelle) -> Steep(sydelle)\nforall x (Barbecued(x) and Steep(x) -> Revengeful(x))\n\nnot Alienated(ruperto)\n\nnot Alienated(ruperto) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Jacenta is buttoned. Adora is rambling. Loleta is buttoned. If something is hiemal then it is floury. All rambling, floury things are wainscoted. Furry, rambling things are not wainscoted. All rambling things are hiemal. If Loleta is rambling and Loleta is wainscoted then Loleta is buttoned. All rambling, buttoned things are moderato. Jacenta is rambling.", "logic": "\nButtoned(jacenta)\nRambling(adora)\nButtoned(loleta)\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Floury(x))\nforall x (Rambling(x) and Floury(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Magnified(x) and Rambling(x) -> not Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Rambling(x) -> Hiemal(x))\nRambling(loleta) and Wainscoted(loleta) -> Buttoned(loleta)\nforall x (Rambling(x) and Buttoned(x) -> Moderato(x))\n\nRambling(jacenta)\n\nRambling(jacenta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-801"} {"premises": "Gladi is mucous. Gladi is provencal. Oriana is not frosty. Oriana is medicinal. Oriana is monoploid. Oriana is tuberous. Oriana is mucous. White, nonbearing things are mucous. All nonbearing things are medicinal. Furry, monoploid things are nonbearing. Quiet, mucous things are nonbearing. White things are tuberous. If Gladi is mucous and Gladi is medicinal then Gladi is provencal. All tuberous things are monoploid. If Gladi is tuberous and Gladi is provencal then Gladi is nonbearing. Oriana is monoploid.", "logic": "\nMucous(gladi)\nProvencal(gladi)\nnot Frosty(oriana)\nMedicinal(oriana)\nMonoploid(oriana)\nTuberous(oriana)\nMucous(oriana)\nforall x (Provencal(x) and Nonbearing(x) -> Mucous(x))\nforall x (Nonbearing(x) -> Medicinal(x))\nforall x (Frosty(x) and Monoploid(x) -> Nonbearing(x))\nforall x (Monoploid(x) and Mucous(x) -> Nonbearing(x))\nforall x (Provencal(x) -> Tuberous(x))\nMucous(gladi) and Medicinal(gladi) -> Provencal(gladi)\nforall x (Tuberous(x) -> Monoploid(x))\nTuberous(gladi) and Provencal(gladi) -> Nonbearing(gladi)\n\nMonoploid(oriana)\n\ntherefore Monoploid(oriana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Dick is fijian. Dick is incursive. Prudence is not worthwhile. Prudence is real. Prudence is centennial. Prudence is absolutist. Prudence is fijian. White, uncombed things are fijian. All uncombed things are real. Furry, centennial things are uncombed. Quiet, fijian things are uncombed. White things are absolutist. If Dick is fijian and Dick is real then Dick is incursive. All absolutist things are centennial. If Dick is absolutist and Dick is incursive then Dick is uncombed. Prudence is not real.", "logic": "\nFijian(dick)\nIncursive(dick)\nnot Worthwhile(prudence)\nReal(prudence)\nCentennial(prudence)\nAbsolutist(prudence)\nFijian(prudence)\nforall x (Incursive(x) and Uncombed(x) -> Fijian(x))\nforall x (Uncombed(x) -> Real(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) and Centennial(x) -> Uncombed(x))\nforall x (Centennial(x) and Fijian(x) -> Uncombed(x))\nforall x (Incursive(x) -> Absolutist(x))\nFijian(dick) and Real(dick) -> Incursive(dick)\nforall x (Absolutist(x) -> Centennial(x))\nAbsolutist(dick) and Incursive(dick) -> Uncombed(dick)\n\nnot Real(prudence)\n\ntherefore Real(prudence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Davidde is ethnical. Davidde is spicate. Jude is not meddling. Jude is monastic. Jude is fifteenth. Jude is saintly. Jude is ethnical. White, unpaid things are ethnical. All unpaid things are monastic. Furry, fifteenth things are unpaid. Quiet, ethnical things are unpaid. White things are saintly. If Davidde is ethnical and Davidde is monastic then Davidde is spicate. All saintly things are fifteenth. If Davidde is saintly and Davidde is spicate then Davidde is unpaid. Jude is unpaid.", "logic": "\nEthnical(davidde)\nSpicate(davidde)\nnot Meddling(jude)\nMonastic(jude)\nFifteenth(jude)\nSaintly(jude)\nEthnical(jude)\nforall x (Spicate(x) and Unpaid(x) -> Ethnical(x))\nforall x (Unpaid(x) -> Monastic(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) and Fifteenth(x) -> Unpaid(x))\nforall x (Fifteenth(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Unpaid(x))\nforall x (Spicate(x) -> Saintly(x))\nEthnical(davidde) and Monastic(davidde) -> Spicate(davidde)\nforall x (Saintly(x) -> Fifteenth(x))\nSaintly(davidde) and Spicate(davidde) -> Unpaid(davidde)\n\nUnpaid(jude)\n\nFifteenth(jude) and Ethnical(jude) and forall x (Fifteenth(x) and Ethnical(x) -> Unpaid(x)) -> therefore Unpaid(jude)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Wilhelm is prescient. Wilhelm is refreshing. Nissa is not tubed. Nissa is fleet. Nissa is unfearing. Nissa is surgical. Nissa is prescient. White, armorial things are prescient. All armorial things are fleet. Furry, unfearing things are armorial. Quiet, prescient things are armorial. White things are surgical. If Wilhelm is prescient and Wilhelm is fleet then Wilhelm is refreshing. All surgical things are unfearing. If Wilhelm is surgical and Wilhelm is refreshing then Wilhelm is armorial. Nissa is not armorial.", "logic": "\nPrescient(wilhelm)\nRefreshing(wilhelm)\nnot Tubed(nissa)\nFleet(nissa)\nUnfearing(nissa)\nSurgical(nissa)\nPrescient(nissa)\nforall x (Refreshing(x) and Armorial(x) -> Prescient(x))\nforall x (Armorial(x) -> Fleet(x))\nforall x (Tubed(x) and Unfearing(x) -> Armorial(x))\nforall x (Unfearing(x) and Prescient(x) -> Armorial(x))\nforall x (Refreshing(x) -> Surgical(x))\nPrescient(wilhelm) and Fleet(wilhelm) -> Refreshing(wilhelm)\nforall x (Surgical(x) -> Unfearing(x))\nSurgical(wilhelm) and Refreshing(wilhelm) -> Armorial(wilhelm)\n\nnot Armorial(nissa)\n\nUnfearing(nissa) and Prescient(nissa) and forall x (Unfearing(x) and Prescient(x) -> Armorial(x)) -> therefore Armorial(nissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Lilah is jingly. Lilah is polyatomic. Faith is not impalpable. Faith is dyspneic. Faith is oafish. Faith is amicable. Faith is jingly. White, adsorbable things are jingly. All adsorbable things are dyspneic. Furry, oafish things are adsorbable. Quiet, jingly things are adsorbable. White things are amicable. If Lilah is jingly and Lilah is dyspneic then Lilah is polyatomic. All amicable things are oafish. If Lilah is amicable and Lilah is polyatomic then Lilah is adsorbable. Lilah is oafish.", "logic": "\nJingly(lilah)\nPolyatomic(lilah)\nnot Impalpable(faith)\nDyspneic(faith)\nOafish(faith)\nAmicable(faith)\nJingly(faith)\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) and Adsorbable(x) -> Jingly(x))\nforall x (Adsorbable(x) -> Dyspneic(x))\nforall x (Impalpable(x) and Oafish(x) -> Adsorbable(x))\nforall x (Oafish(x) and Jingly(x) -> Adsorbable(x))\nforall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Amicable(x))\nJingly(lilah) and Dyspneic(lilah) -> Polyatomic(lilah)\nforall x (Amicable(x) -> Oafish(x))\nAmicable(lilah) and Polyatomic(lilah) -> Adsorbable(lilah)\n\nOafish(lilah)\n\nPolyatomic(lilah) and forall x (Polyatomic(x) -> Amicable(x)) -> therefore Amicable(lilah) Amicable(lilah) and forall x (Amicable(x) -> Oafish(x)) -> therefore Oafish(lilah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Bobinette is sibylline. Bobinette is invertible. Liana is not figurative. Liana is esteemed. Liana is assuasive. Liana is apathetic. Liana is sibylline. White, seared things are sibylline. All seared things are esteemed. Furry, assuasive things are seared. Quiet, sibylline things are seared. White things are apathetic. If Bobinette is sibylline and Bobinette is esteemed then Bobinette is invertible. All apathetic things are assuasive. If Bobinette is apathetic and Bobinette is invertible then Bobinette is seared. Bobinette is not seared.", "logic": "\nSibylline(bobinette)\nInvertible(bobinette)\nnot Figurative(liana)\nEsteemed(liana)\nAssuasive(liana)\nApathetic(liana)\nSibylline(liana)\nforall x (Invertible(x) and Seared(x) -> Sibylline(x))\nforall x (Seared(x) -> Esteemed(x))\nforall x (Figurative(x) and Assuasive(x) -> Seared(x))\nforall x (Assuasive(x) and Sibylline(x) -> Seared(x))\nforall x (Invertible(x) -> Apathetic(x))\nSibylline(bobinette) and Esteemed(bobinette) -> Invertible(bobinette)\nforall x (Apathetic(x) -> Assuasive(x))\nApathetic(bobinette) and Invertible(bobinette) -> Seared(bobinette)\n\nnot Seared(bobinette)\n\nInvertible(bobinette) and forall x (Invertible(x) -> Apathetic(x)) -> therefore Apathetic(bobinette) Apathetic(bobinette) and Invertible(bobinette) and Apathetic(bobinette) and Invertible(bobinette) -> Seared(bobinette) -> therefore Seared(bobinette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Karolina is impotent. Karolina is budding. Mei is not interim. Mei is palliative. Mei is axenic. Mei is coincident. Mei is impotent. White, dubious things are impotent. All dubious things are palliative. Furry, axenic things are dubious. Quiet, impotent things are dubious. White things are coincident. If Karolina is impotent and Karolina is palliative then Karolina is budding. All coincident things are axenic. If Karolina is coincident and Karolina is budding then Karolina is dubious. Karolina is palliative.", "logic": "\nImpotent(karolina)\nBudding(karolina)\nnot Interim(mei)\nPalliative(mei)\nAxenic(mei)\nCoincident(mei)\nImpotent(mei)\nforall x (Budding(x) and Dubious(x) -> Impotent(x))\nforall x (Dubious(x) -> Palliative(x))\nforall x (Interim(x) and Axenic(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Axenic(x) and Impotent(x) -> Dubious(x))\nforall x (Budding(x) -> Coincident(x))\nImpotent(karolina) and Palliative(karolina) -> Budding(karolina)\nforall x (Coincident(x) -> Axenic(x))\nCoincident(karolina) and Budding(karolina) -> Dubious(karolina)\n\nPalliative(karolina)\n\nBudding(karolina) and forall x (Budding(x) -> Coincident(x)) -> therefore Coincident(karolina) Coincident(karolina) and Budding(karolina) and Coincident(karolina) and Budding(karolina) -> Dubious(karolina) -> therefore Dubious(karolina) Dubious(karolina) and forall x (Dubious(x) -> Palliative(x)) -> therefore Palliative(karolina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Gus is writhing. Gus is planktonic. Adrien is not disciform. Adrien is squab. Adrien is anuretic. Adrien is disdainful. Adrien is writhing. White, wearing things are writhing. All wearing things are squab. Furry, anuretic things are wearing. Quiet, writhing things are wearing. White things are disdainful. If Gus is writhing and Gus is squab then Gus is planktonic. All disdainful things are anuretic. If Gus is disdainful and Gus is planktonic then Gus is wearing. Gus is not squab.", "logic": "\nWrithing(gus)\nPlanktonic(gus)\nnot Disciform(adrien)\nSquab(adrien)\nAnuretic(adrien)\nDisdainful(adrien)\nWrithing(adrien)\nforall x (Planktonic(x) and Wearing(x) -> Writhing(x))\nforall x (Wearing(x) -> Squab(x))\nforall x (Disciform(x) and Anuretic(x) -> Wearing(x))\nforall x (Anuretic(x) and Writhing(x) -> Wearing(x))\nforall x (Planktonic(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nWrithing(gus) and Squab(gus) -> Planktonic(gus)\nforall x (Disdainful(x) -> Anuretic(x))\nDisdainful(gus) and Planktonic(gus) -> Wearing(gus)\n\nnot Squab(gus)\n\nPlanktonic(gus) and forall x (Planktonic(x) -> Disdainful(x)) -> therefore Disdainful(gus) Disdainful(gus) and Planktonic(gus) and Disdainful(gus) and Planktonic(gus) -> Wearing(gus) -> therefore Wearing(gus) Wearing(gus) and forall x (Wearing(x) -> Squab(x)) -> therefore Squab(gus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Yaakov is tabby. Yaakov is greased. Nikoletta is not listed. Nikoletta is areolate. Nikoletta is vascular. Nikoletta is prenominal. Nikoletta is tabby. White, xlvi things are tabby. All xlvi things are areolate. Furry, vascular things are xlvi. Quiet, tabby things are xlvi. White things are prenominal. If Yaakov is tabby and Yaakov is areolate then Yaakov is greased. All prenominal things are vascular. If Yaakov is prenominal and Yaakov is greased then Yaakov is xlvi. Nikoletta is not greased.", "logic": "\nTabby(yaakov)\nGreased(yaakov)\nnot Listed(nikoletta)\nAreolate(nikoletta)\nVascular(nikoletta)\nPrenominal(nikoletta)\nTabby(nikoletta)\nforall x (Greased(x) and Xlvi(x) -> Tabby(x))\nforall x (Xlvi(x) -> Areolate(x))\nforall x (Listed(x) and Vascular(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Vascular(x) and Tabby(x) -> Xlvi(x))\nforall x (Greased(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nTabby(yaakov) and Areolate(yaakov) -> Greased(yaakov)\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Vascular(x))\nPrenominal(yaakov) and Greased(yaakov) -> Xlvi(yaakov)\n\nnot Greased(nikoletta)\n\nnot Greased(nikoletta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Silvester is abscessed. Silvester is surging. Layton is not frigorific. Layton is polish. Layton is anxious. Layton is downright. Layton is abscessed. White, duplicate things are abscessed. All duplicate things are polish. Furry, anxious things are duplicate. Quiet, abscessed things are duplicate. White things are downright. If Silvester is abscessed and Silvester is polish then Silvester is surging. All downright things are anxious. If Silvester is downright and Silvester is surging then Silvester is duplicate. Silvester is frigorific.", "logic": "\nAbscessed(silvester)\nSurging(silvester)\nnot Frigorific(layton)\nPolish(layton)\nAnxious(layton)\nDownright(layton)\nAbscessed(layton)\nforall x (Surging(x) and Duplicate(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Duplicate(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) and Anxious(x) -> Duplicate(x))\nforall x (Anxious(x) and Abscessed(x) -> Duplicate(x))\nforall x (Surging(x) -> Downright(x))\nAbscessed(silvester) and Polish(silvester) -> Surging(silvester)\nforall x (Downright(x) -> Anxious(x))\nDownright(silvester) and Surging(silvester) -> Duplicate(silvester)\n\nFrigorific(silvester)\n\nFrigorific(silvester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1573"} {"premises": "Nyssa is sugarless. Jacqui is married. All sugarless, unlawful people are tearing. Jacqui is married.", "logic": "\nSugarless(nyssa)\nMarried(jacqui)\nforall x (Sugarless(x) and Unlawful(x) -> Tearing(x))\n\nMarried(jacqui)\n\ntherefore Married(jacqui)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3008"} {"premises": "Leonora is rheumatoid. Anjanette is febrile. All rheumatoid, unsure people are antiphonal. Anjanette is not febrile.", "logic": "\nRheumatoid(leonora)\nFebrile(anjanette)\nforall x (Rheumatoid(x) and Unsure(x) -> Antiphonal(x))\n\nnot Febrile(anjanette)\n\ntherefore Febrile(anjanette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3008"} {"premises": "Hall is rapturous. Trisha is sidereal. All rapturous, grapelike people are ascribable. Trisha is not ascribable.", "logic": "\nRapturous(hall)\nSidereal(trisha)\nforall x (Rapturous(x) and Grapelike(x) -> Ascribable(x))\n\nnot Ascribable(trisha)\n\nforall x (Rapturous(x) and Grapelike(x) -> Ascribable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3008"} {"premises": "Deloris is dull. Carmella is studied. All dull, myopathic people are recognised. Deloris is cold.", "logic": "\nDull(deloris)\nStudied(carmella)\nforall x (Dull(x) and Myopathic(x) -> Recognised(x))\n\nCold(deloris)\n\nCold(deloris) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3008"} {"premises": "Florina is sapient. Florina is thornless. Florina is senescent. Reina is septrional. Reina is outright. Reina is sapient. Reina is thornless. Reina is senescent. Reina is galvanic. Reina is blameless. Blue things are senescent. If something is blameless and septrional then it is galvanic. If Florina is sapient and Florina is outright then Florina is septrional. Round, thornless things are septrional. If something is blameless and senescent then it is outright. If something is septrional then it is blameless. Reina is sapient.", "logic": "\nSapient(florina)\nThornless(florina)\nSenescent(florina)\nSeptrional(reina)\nOutright(reina)\nSapient(reina)\nThornless(reina)\nSenescent(reina)\nGalvanic(reina)\nBlameless(reina)\nforall x (Outright(x) -> Senescent(x))\nforall x (Blameless(x) and Septrional(x) -> Galvanic(x))\nSapient(florina) and Outright(florina) -> Septrional(florina)\nforall x (Senescent(x) and Thornless(x) -> Septrional(x))\nforall x (Blameless(x) and Senescent(x) -> Outright(x))\nforall x (Septrional(x) -> Blameless(x))\n\nSapient(reina)\n\ntherefore Sapient(reina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Teena is immemorial. Teena is drizzly. Teena is crippled. Yule is monocarpic. Yule is sidearm. Yule is immemorial. Yule is drizzly. Yule is crippled. Yule is observant. Yule is crested. Blue things are crippled. If something is crested and monocarpic then it is observant. If Teena is immemorial and Teena is sidearm then Teena is monocarpic. Round, drizzly things are monocarpic. If something is crested and crippled then it is sidearm. If something is monocarpic then it is crested. Teena is not drizzly.", "logic": "\nImmemorial(teena)\nDrizzly(teena)\nCrippled(teena)\nMonocarpic(yule)\nSidearm(yule)\nImmemorial(yule)\nDrizzly(yule)\nCrippled(yule)\nObservant(yule)\nCrested(yule)\nforall x (Sidearm(x) -> Crippled(x))\nforall x (Crested(x) and Monocarpic(x) -> Observant(x))\nImmemorial(teena) and Sidearm(teena) -> Monocarpic(teena)\nforall x (Crippled(x) and Drizzly(x) -> Monocarpic(x))\nforall x (Crested(x) and Crippled(x) -> Sidearm(x))\nforall x (Monocarpic(x) -> Crested(x))\n\nnot Drizzly(teena)\n\ntherefore Drizzly(teena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Rolfe is exculpated. Rolfe is ukrainian. Rolfe is gluttonous. Britte is panegyric. Britte is lumpy. Britte is exculpated. Britte is ukrainian. Britte is gluttonous. Britte is confirmed. Britte is cymose. Blue things are gluttonous. If something is cymose and panegyric then it is confirmed. If Rolfe is exculpated and Rolfe is lumpy then Rolfe is panegyric. Round, ukrainian things are panegyric. If something is cymose and gluttonous then it is lumpy. If something is panegyric then it is cymose. Rolfe is panegyric.", "logic": "\nExculpated(rolfe)\nUkrainian(rolfe)\nGluttonous(rolfe)\nPanegyric(britte)\nLumpy(britte)\nExculpated(britte)\nUkrainian(britte)\nGluttonous(britte)\nConfirmed(britte)\nCymose(britte)\nforall x (Lumpy(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Cymose(x) and Panegyric(x) -> Confirmed(x))\nExculpated(rolfe) and Lumpy(rolfe) -> Panegyric(rolfe)\nforall x (Gluttonous(x) and Ukrainian(x) -> Panegyric(x))\nforall x (Cymose(x) and Gluttonous(x) -> Lumpy(x))\nforall x (Panegyric(x) -> Cymose(x))\n\nPanegyric(rolfe)\n\nGluttonous(rolfe) and Ukrainian(rolfe) and forall x (Gluttonous(x) and Ukrainian(x) -> Panegyric(x)) -> therefore Panegyric(rolfe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Janey is diluted. Janey is dissenting. Janey is estimable. Marlene is amphibious. Marlene is deathly. Marlene is diluted. Marlene is dissenting. Marlene is estimable. Marlene is hardcore. Marlene is basophilic. Blue things are estimable. If something is basophilic and amphibious then it is hardcore. If Janey is diluted and Janey is deathly then Janey is amphibious. Round, dissenting things are amphibious. If something is basophilic and estimable then it is deathly. If something is amphibious then it is basophilic. Janey is not amphibious.", "logic": "\nDiluted(janey)\nDissenting(janey)\nEstimable(janey)\nAmphibious(marlene)\nDeathly(marlene)\nDiluted(marlene)\nDissenting(marlene)\nEstimable(marlene)\nHardcore(marlene)\nBasophilic(marlene)\nforall x (Deathly(x) -> Estimable(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) and Amphibious(x) -> Hardcore(x))\nDiluted(janey) and Deathly(janey) -> Amphibious(janey)\nforall x (Estimable(x) and Dissenting(x) -> Amphibious(x))\nforall x (Basophilic(x) and Estimable(x) -> Deathly(x))\nforall x (Amphibious(x) -> Basophilic(x))\n\nnot Amphibious(janey)\n\nEstimable(janey) and Dissenting(janey) and forall x (Estimable(x) and Dissenting(x) -> Amphibious(x)) -> therefore Amphibious(janey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Uri is bowlegged. Uri is catabatic. Uri is weather. Gerianna is prevailing. Gerianna is foliate. Gerianna is bowlegged. Gerianna is catabatic. Gerianna is weather. Gerianna is foolish. Gerianna is credible. Blue things are weather. If something is credible and prevailing then it is foolish. If Uri is bowlegged and Uri is foliate then Uri is prevailing. Round, catabatic things are prevailing. If something is credible and weather then it is foliate. If something is prevailing then it is credible. Uri is credible.", "logic": "\nBowlegged(uri)\nCatabatic(uri)\nWeather(uri)\nPrevailing(gerianna)\nFoliate(gerianna)\nBowlegged(gerianna)\nCatabatic(gerianna)\nWeather(gerianna)\nFoolish(gerianna)\nCredible(gerianna)\nforall x (Foliate(x) -> Weather(x))\nforall x (Credible(x) and Prevailing(x) -> Foolish(x))\nBowlegged(uri) and Foliate(uri) -> Prevailing(uri)\nforall x (Weather(x) and Catabatic(x) -> Prevailing(x))\nforall x (Credible(x) and Weather(x) -> Foliate(x))\nforall x (Prevailing(x) -> Credible(x))\n\nCredible(uri)\n\nWeather(uri) and Catabatic(uri) and forall x (Weather(x) and Catabatic(x) -> Prevailing(x)) -> therefore Prevailing(uri) Prevailing(uri) and forall x (Prevailing(x) -> Credible(x)) -> therefore Credible(uri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Cassey is crescent. Cassey is unsealed. Cassey is quality. Teddi is uptown. Teddi is canary. Teddi is crescent. Teddi is unsealed. Teddi is quality. Teddi is based. Teddi is tied. Blue things are quality. If something is tied and uptown then it is based. If Cassey is crescent and Cassey is canary then Cassey is uptown. Round, unsealed things are uptown. If something is tied and quality then it is canary. If something is uptown then it is tied. Cassey is not tied.", "logic": "\nCrescent(cassey)\nUnsealed(cassey)\nQuality(cassey)\nUptown(teddi)\nCanary(teddi)\nCrescent(teddi)\nUnsealed(teddi)\nQuality(teddi)\nBased(teddi)\nTied(teddi)\nforall x (Canary(x) -> Quality(x))\nforall x (Tied(x) and Uptown(x) -> Based(x))\nCrescent(cassey) and Canary(cassey) -> Uptown(cassey)\nforall x (Quality(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Uptown(x))\nforall x (Tied(x) and Quality(x) -> Canary(x))\nforall x (Uptown(x) -> Tied(x))\n\nnot Tied(cassey)\n\nQuality(cassey) and Unsealed(cassey) and forall x (Quality(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Uptown(x)) -> therefore Uptown(cassey) Uptown(cassey) and forall x (Uptown(x) -> Tied(x)) -> therefore Tied(cassey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Dacey is pettish. Dacey is uncarved. Dacey is virulent. Jacquelyn is angled. Jacquelyn is idle. Jacquelyn is pettish. Jacquelyn is uncarved. Jacquelyn is virulent. Jacquelyn is somatic. Jacquelyn is ransomed. Blue things are virulent. If something is ransomed and angled then it is somatic. If Dacey is pettish and Dacey is idle then Dacey is angled. Round, uncarved things are angled. If something is ransomed and virulent then it is idle. If something is angled then it is ransomed. Dacey is idle.", "logic": "\nPettish(dacey)\nUncarved(dacey)\nVirulent(dacey)\nAngled(jacquelyn)\nIdle(jacquelyn)\nPettish(jacquelyn)\nUncarved(jacquelyn)\nVirulent(jacquelyn)\nSomatic(jacquelyn)\nRansomed(jacquelyn)\nforall x (Idle(x) -> Virulent(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Angled(x) -> Somatic(x))\nPettish(dacey) and Idle(dacey) -> Angled(dacey)\nforall x (Virulent(x) and Uncarved(x) -> Angled(x))\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Virulent(x) -> Idle(x))\nforall x (Angled(x) -> Ransomed(x))\n\nIdle(dacey)\n\nVirulent(dacey) and Uncarved(dacey) and forall x (Virulent(x) and Uncarved(x) -> Angled(x)) -> therefore Angled(dacey) Angled(dacey) and forall x (Angled(x) -> Ransomed(x)) -> therefore Ransomed(dacey) Ransomed(dacey) and Virulent(dacey) and forall x (Ransomed(x) and Virulent(x) -> Idle(x)) -> therefore Idle(dacey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "Doe is rotund. Doe is false. Doe is protozoic. Ender is lopsided. Ender is commensal. Ender is rotund. Ender is false. Ender is protozoic. Ender is roiling. Ender is mythical. Blue things are protozoic. If something is mythical and lopsided then it is roiling. If Doe is rotund and Doe is commensal then Doe is lopsided. Round, false things are lopsided. If something is mythical and protozoic then it is commensal. If something is lopsided then it is mythical. Doe is not roiling.", "logic": "\nRotund(doe)\nFalse(doe)\nProtozoic(doe)\nLopsided(ender)\nCommensal(ender)\nRotund(ender)\nFalse(ender)\nProtozoic(ender)\nRoiling(ender)\nMythical(ender)\nforall x (Commensal(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Mythical(x) and Lopsided(x) -> Roiling(x))\nRotund(doe) and Commensal(doe) -> Lopsided(doe)\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and False(x) -> Lopsided(x))\nforall x (Mythical(x) and Protozoic(x) -> Commensal(x))\nforall x (Lopsided(x) -> Mythical(x))\n\nnot Roiling(doe)\n\nProtozoic(doe) and False(doe) and forall x (Protozoic(x) and False(x) -> Lopsided(x)) -> therefore Lopsided(doe) Lopsided(doe) and forall x (Lopsided(x) -> Mythical(x)) -> therefore Mythical(doe) Protozoic(doe) and False(doe) and forall x (Protozoic(x) and False(x) -> Lopsided(x)) -> therefore Lopsided(doe) Mythical(doe) and Lopsided(doe) and forall x (Mythical(x) and Lopsided(x) -> Roiling(x)) -> therefore Roiling(doe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-341"} {"premises": "The martin evaporate the lazarus. The martin is hermitical. The martin manhandle the rickey. The martin manhandle the lazarus. The martin does not visit the rickey. The rickey pedicure the schuyler. The schuyler evaporate the rickey. The schuyler does not eat the lazarus. The schuyler is pampering. The schuyler pedicure the martin. The lazarus is biparous. The lazarus manhandle the martin. If something manhandle the martin and the martin is hermitical then the martin evaporate the schuyler. If something manhandle the rickey and the rickey evaporate the martin then the martin evaporate the schuyler. If something is migratory then it pedicure the lazarus. If the rickey evaporate the schuyler then the rickey does not see the schuyler. If something evaporate the lazarus then it evaporate the martin. If something is hermitical and it evaporate the schuyler then the schuyler is migratory. If the lazarus is not pestering then the lazarus evaporate the martin. If something pedicure the martin then the martin does not see the schuyler. The schuyler evaporate the rickey.", "logic": "\nEvaporate(martin, lazarus)\nHermitical(martin)\nManhandle(martin, rickey)\nManhandle(martin, lazarus)\nnot Pedicure(martin, rickey)\nPedicure(rickey, schuyler)\nEvaporate(schuyler, rickey)\nnot Evaporate(schuyler, lazarus)\nPampering(schuyler)\nPedicure(schuyler, martin)\nBiparous(lazarus)\nManhandle(lazarus, martin)\nforall x (Manhandle(x, martin) and Hermitical(martin) -> Evaporate(martin, schuyler))\nforall x (Manhandle(x, rickey) and Evaporate(rickey, martin) -> Evaporate(martin, schuyler))\nforall x (Migratory(x) -> Pedicure(x, lazarus))\nEvaporate(rickey, schuyler) -> not Manhandle(rickey, schuyler)\nforall x (Evaporate(x, lazarus) -> Evaporate(x, martin))\nforall x (Hermitical(x) and Evaporate(x, schuyler) -> Migratory(schuyler))\nnot Pestering(lazarus) -> Evaporate(lazarus, martin)\nforall x (Pedicure(x, martin) -> not Manhandle(martin, schuyler))\n\nEvaporate(schuyler, rickey)\n\ntherefore Evaporate(schuyler, rickey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The ailey waltz the othilia. The ailey is unsatiable. The ailey rampage the dedra. The ailey rampage the othilia. The ailey does not visit the dedra. The dedra spit the analiese. The analiese waltz the dedra. The analiese does not eat the othilia. The analiese is untrue. The analiese spit the ailey. The othilia is grapy. The othilia rampage the ailey. If something rampage the ailey and the ailey is unsatiable then the ailey waltz the analiese. If something rampage the dedra and the dedra waltz the ailey then the ailey waltz the analiese. If something is avian then it spit the othilia. If the dedra waltz the analiese then the dedra does not see the analiese. If something waltz the othilia then it waltz the ailey. If something is unsatiable and it waltz the analiese then the analiese is avian. If the othilia is not wandering then the othilia waltz the ailey. If something spit the ailey then the ailey does not see the analiese. The dedra does not visit the analiese.", "logic": "\nWaltz(ailey, othilia)\nUnsatiable(ailey)\nRampage(ailey, dedra)\nRampage(ailey, othilia)\nnot Spit(ailey, dedra)\nSpit(dedra, analiese)\nWaltz(analiese, dedra)\nnot Waltz(analiese, othilia)\nUntrue(analiese)\nSpit(analiese, ailey)\nGrapy(othilia)\nRampage(othilia, ailey)\nforall x (Rampage(x, ailey) and Unsatiable(ailey) -> Waltz(ailey, analiese))\nforall x (Rampage(x, dedra) and Waltz(dedra, ailey) -> Waltz(ailey, analiese))\nforall x (Avian(x) -> Spit(x, othilia))\nWaltz(dedra, analiese) -> not Rampage(dedra, analiese)\nforall x (Waltz(x, othilia) -> Waltz(x, ailey))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) and Waltz(x, analiese) -> Avian(analiese))\nnot Wandering(othilia) -> Waltz(othilia, ailey)\nforall x (Spit(x, ailey) -> not Rampage(ailey, analiese))\n\nnot Spit(dedra, analiese)\n\ntherefore Spit(dedra, analiese)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The ula roast the karlene. The ula is greyed. The ula diddle the lemmie. The ula diddle the karlene. The ula does not visit the lemmie. The lemmie wink the vick. The vick roast the lemmie. The vick does not eat the karlene. The vick is pictured. The vick wink the ula. The karlene is spiraling. The karlene diddle the ula. If something diddle the ula and the ula is greyed then the ula roast the vick. If something diddle the lemmie and the lemmie roast the ula then the ula roast the vick. If something is grassless then it wink the karlene. If the lemmie roast the vick then the lemmie does not see the vick. If something roast the karlene then it roast the ula. If something is greyed and it roast the vick then the vick is grassless. If the karlene is not eastern then the karlene roast the ula. If something wink the ula then the ula does not see the vick. The ula roast the ula.", "logic": "\nRoast(ula, karlene)\nGreyed(ula)\nDiddle(ula, lemmie)\nDiddle(ula, karlene)\nnot Wink(ula, lemmie)\nWink(lemmie, vick)\nRoast(vick, lemmie)\nnot Roast(vick, karlene)\nPictured(vick)\nWink(vick, ula)\nSpiraling(karlene)\nDiddle(karlene, ula)\nforall x (Diddle(x, ula) and Greyed(ula) -> Roast(ula, vick))\nforall x (Diddle(x, lemmie) and Roast(lemmie, ula) -> Roast(ula, vick))\nforall x (Grassless(x) -> Wink(x, karlene))\nRoast(lemmie, vick) -> not Diddle(lemmie, vick)\nforall x (Roast(x, karlene) -> Roast(x, ula))\nforall x (Greyed(x) and Roast(x, vick) -> Grassless(vick))\nnot Eastern(karlene) -> Roast(karlene, ula)\nforall x (Wink(x, ula) -> not Diddle(ula, vick))\n\nRoast(ula, ula)\n\nRoast(ula, karlene) and forall x (Roast(x, karlene) -> Roast(x, ula)) -> therefore Roast(ula, ula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The marko rede the myrta. The marko is endozoan. The marko spiel the lilia. The marko spiel the myrta. The marko does not visit the lilia. The lilia dehumanise the florina. The florina rede the lilia. The florina does not eat the myrta. The florina is camp. The florina dehumanise the marko. The myrta is neckless. The myrta spiel the marko. If something spiel the marko and the marko is endozoan then the marko rede the florina. If something spiel the lilia and the lilia rede the marko then the marko rede the florina. If something is coexisting then it dehumanise the myrta. If the lilia rede the florina then the lilia does not see the florina. If something rede the myrta then it rede the marko. If something is endozoan and it rede the florina then the florina is coexisting. If the myrta is not sedative then the myrta rede the marko. If something dehumanise the marko then the marko does not see the florina. The marko does not eat the marko.", "logic": "\nRede(marko, myrta)\nEndozoan(marko)\nSpiel(marko, lilia)\nSpiel(marko, myrta)\nnot Dehumanise(marko, lilia)\nDehumanise(lilia, florina)\nRede(florina, lilia)\nnot Rede(florina, myrta)\nCamp(florina)\nDehumanise(florina, marko)\nNeckless(myrta)\nSpiel(myrta, marko)\nforall x (Spiel(x, marko) and Endozoan(marko) -> Rede(marko, florina))\nforall x (Spiel(x, lilia) and Rede(lilia, marko) -> Rede(marko, florina))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) -> Dehumanise(x, myrta))\nRede(lilia, florina) -> not Spiel(lilia, florina)\nforall x (Rede(x, myrta) -> Rede(x, marko))\nforall x (Endozoan(x) and Rede(x, florina) -> Coexisting(florina))\nnot Sedative(myrta) -> Rede(myrta, marko)\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, marko) -> not Spiel(marko, florina))\n\nnot Rede(marko, marko)\n\nRede(marko, myrta) and forall x (Rede(x, myrta) -> Rede(x, marko)) -> therefore Rede(marko, marko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The maxfield cark the madonna. The maxfield is flabby. The maxfield schmooze the richie. The maxfield schmooze the madonna. The maxfield does not visit the richie. The richie drizzle the sean. The sean cark the richie. The sean does not eat the madonna. The sean is fruitless. The sean drizzle the maxfield. The madonna is romaic. The madonna schmooze the maxfield. If something schmooze the maxfield and the maxfield is flabby then the maxfield cark the sean. If something schmooze the richie and the richie cark the maxfield then the maxfield cark the sean. If something is specified then it drizzle the madonna. If the richie cark the sean then the richie does not see the sean. If something cark the madonna then it cark the maxfield. If something is flabby and it cark the sean then the sean is specified. If the madonna is not tinselly then the madonna cark the maxfield. If something drizzle the maxfield then the maxfield does not see the sean. The sean is specified.", "logic": "\nCark(maxfield, madonna)\nFlabby(maxfield)\nSchmooze(maxfield, richie)\nSchmooze(maxfield, madonna)\nnot Drizzle(maxfield, richie)\nDrizzle(richie, sean)\nCark(sean, richie)\nnot Cark(sean, madonna)\nFruitless(sean)\nDrizzle(sean, maxfield)\nRomaic(madonna)\nSchmooze(madonna, maxfield)\nforall x (Schmooze(x, maxfield) and Flabby(maxfield) -> Cark(maxfield, sean))\nforall x (Schmooze(x, richie) and Cark(richie, maxfield) -> Cark(maxfield, sean))\nforall x (Specified(x) -> Drizzle(x, madonna))\nCark(richie, sean) -> not Schmooze(richie, sean)\nforall x (Cark(x, madonna) -> Cark(x, maxfield))\nforall x (Flabby(x) and Cark(x, sean) -> Specified(sean))\nnot Tinselly(madonna) -> Cark(madonna, maxfield)\nforall x (Drizzle(x, maxfield) -> not Schmooze(maxfield, sean))\n\nSpecified(sean)\n\nSchmooze(madonna, maxfield) and Flabby(maxfield) and forall x (Schmooze(x, maxfield) and Flabby(maxfield) -> Cark(maxfield, sean)) -> therefore Cark(maxfield, sean) Flabby(maxfield) and Cark(maxfield, sean) and forall x (Flabby(x) and Cark(x, sean) -> Specified(sean)) -> therefore Specified(sean)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The shaylyn proscribe the feodora. The shaylyn is spread. The shaylyn reassemble the dorita. The shaylyn reassemble the feodora. The shaylyn does not visit the dorita. The dorita worship the wang. The wang proscribe the dorita. The wang does not eat the feodora. The wang is amnionic. The wang worship the shaylyn. The feodora is nonstick. The feodora reassemble the shaylyn. If something reassemble the shaylyn and the shaylyn is spread then the shaylyn proscribe the wang. If something reassemble the dorita and the dorita proscribe the shaylyn then the shaylyn proscribe the wang. If something is incurvate then it worship the feodora. If the dorita proscribe the wang then the dorita does not see the wang. If something proscribe the feodora then it proscribe the shaylyn. If something is spread and it proscribe the wang then the wang is incurvate. If the feodora is not consuming then the feodora proscribe the shaylyn. If something worship the shaylyn then the shaylyn does not see the wang. The wang is not incurvate.", "logic": "\nProscribe(shaylyn, feodora)\nSpread(shaylyn)\nReassemble(shaylyn, dorita)\nReassemble(shaylyn, feodora)\nnot Worship(shaylyn, dorita)\nWorship(dorita, wang)\nProscribe(wang, dorita)\nnot Proscribe(wang, feodora)\nAmnionic(wang)\nWorship(wang, shaylyn)\nNonstick(feodora)\nReassemble(feodora, shaylyn)\nforall x (Reassemble(x, shaylyn) and Spread(shaylyn) -> Proscribe(shaylyn, wang))\nforall x (Reassemble(x, dorita) and Proscribe(dorita, shaylyn) -> Proscribe(shaylyn, wang))\nforall x (Incurvate(x) -> Worship(x, feodora))\nProscribe(dorita, wang) -> not Reassemble(dorita, wang)\nforall x (Proscribe(x, feodora) -> Proscribe(x, shaylyn))\nforall x (Spread(x) and Proscribe(x, wang) -> Incurvate(wang))\nnot Consuming(feodora) -> Proscribe(feodora, shaylyn)\nforall x (Worship(x, shaylyn) -> not Reassemble(shaylyn, wang))\n\nnot Incurvate(wang)\n\nReassemble(feodora, shaylyn) and Spread(shaylyn) and forall x (Reassemble(x, shaylyn) and Spread(shaylyn) -> Proscribe(shaylyn, wang)) -> therefore Proscribe(shaylyn, wang) Spread(shaylyn) and Proscribe(shaylyn, wang) and forall x (Spread(x) and Proscribe(x, wang) -> Incurvate(wang)) -> therefore Incurvate(wang)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The ertha manifold the joelynn. The ertha is outmoded. The ertha retrovert the sheffie. The ertha retrovert the joelynn. The ertha does not visit the sheffie. The sheffie concentre the nevins. The nevins manifold the sheffie. The nevins does not eat the joelynn. The nevins is epizoan. The nevins concentre the ertha. The joelynn is asserted. The joelynn retrovert the ertha. If something retrovert the ertha and the ertha is outmoded then the ertha manifold the nevins. If something retrovert the sheffie and the sheffie manifold the ertha then the ertha manifold the nevins. If something is scabby then it concentre the joelynn. If the sheffie manifold the nevins then the sheffie does not see the nevins. If something manifold the joelynn then it manifold the ertha. If something is outmoded and it manifold the nevins then the nevins is scabby. If the joelynn is not faint then the joelynn manifold the ertha. If something concentre the ertha then the ertha does not see the nevins. The nevins concentre the joelynn.", "logic": "\nManifold(ertha, joelynn)\nOutmoded(ertha)\nRetrovert(ertha, sheffie)\nRetrovert(ertha, joelynn)\nnot Concentre(ertha, sheffie)\nConcentre(sheffie, nevins)\nManifold(nevins, sheffie)\nnot Manifold(nevins, joelynn)\nEpizoan(nevins)\nConcentre(nevins, ertha)\nAsserted(joelynn)\nRetrovert(joelynn, ertha)\nforall x (Retrovert(x, ertha) and Outmoded(ertha) -> Manifold(ertha, nevins))\nforall x (Retrovert(x, sheffie) and Manifold(sheffie, ertha) -> Manifold(ertha, nevins))\nforall x (Scabby(x) -> Concentre(x, joelynn))\nManifold(sheffie, nevins) -> not Retrovert(sheffie, nevins)\nforall x (Manifold(x, joelynn) -> Manifold(x, ertha))\nforall x (Outmoded(x) and Manifold(x, nevins) -> Scabby(nevins))\nnot Faint(joelynn) -> Manifold(joelynn, ertha)\nforall x (Concentre(x, ertha) -> not Retrovert(ertha, nevins))\n\nConcentre(nevins, joelynn)\n\nRetrovert(joelynn, ertha) and Outmoded(ertha) and forall x (Retrovert(x, ertha) and Outmoded(ertha) -> Manifold(ertha, nevins)) -> therefore Manifold(ertha, nevins) Outmoded(ertha) and Manifold(ertha, nevins) and forall x (Outmoded(x) and Manifold(x, nevins) -> Scabby(nevins)) -> therefore Scabby(nevins) Scabby(nevins) and forall x (Scabby(x) -> Concentre(x, joelynn)) -> therefore Concentre(nevins, joelynn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The lenna mandate the vannie. The lenna is diarrheic. The lenna array the lauraine. The lenna array the vannie. The lenna does not visit the lauraine. The lauraine compromise the maybelle. The maybelle mandate the lauraine. The maybelle does not eat the vannie. The maybelle is lowly. The maybelle compromise the lenna. The vannie is bored. The vannie array the lenna. If something array the lenna and the lenna is diarrheic then the lenna mandate the maybelle. If something array the lauraine and the lauraine mandate the lenna then the lenna mandate the maybelle. If something is extempore then it compromise the vannie. If the lauraine mandate the maybelle then the lauraine does not see the maybelle. If something mandate the vannie then it mandate the lenna. If something is diarrheic and it mandate the maybelle then the maybelle is extempore. If the vannie is not auditory then the vannie mandate the lenna. If something compromise the lenna then the lenna does not see the maybelle. The maybelle does not visit the vannie.", "logic": "\nMandate(lenna, vannie)\nDiarrheic(lenna)\nArray(lenna, lauraine)\nArray(lenna, vannie)\nnot Compromise(lenna, lauraine)\nCompromise(lauraine, maybelle)\nMandate(maybelle, lauraine)\nnot Mandate(maybelle, vannie)\nLowly(maybelle)\nCompromise(maybelle, lenna)\nBored(vannie)\nArray(vannie, lenna)\nforall x (Array(x, lenna) and Diarrheic(lenna) -> Mandate(lenna, maybelle))\nforall x (Array(x, lauraine) and Mandate(lauraine, lenna) -> Mandate(lenna, maybelle))\nforall x (Extempore(x) -> Compromise(x, vannie))\nMandate(lauraine, maybelle) -> not Array(lauraine, maybelle)\nforall x (Mandate(x, vannie) -> Mandate(x, lenna))\nforall x (Diarrheic(x) and Mandate(x, maybelle) -> Extempore(maybelle))\nnot Auditory(vannie) -> Mandate(vannie, lenna)\nforall x (Compromise(x, lenna) -> not Array(lenna, maybelle))\n\nnot Compromise(maybelle, vannie)\n\nArray(vannie, lenna) and Diarrheic(lenna) and forall x (Array(x, lenna) and Diarrheic(lenna) -> Mandate(lenna, maybelle)) -> therefore Mandate(lenna, maybelle) Diarrheic(lenna) and Mandate(lenna, maybelle) and forall x (Diarrheic(x) and Mandate(x, maybelle) -> Extempore(maybelle)) -> therefore Extempore(maybelle) Extempore(maybelle) and forall x (Extempore(x) -> Compromise(x, vannie)) -> therefore Compromise(maybelle, vannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The melvin protrude the muire. The melvin is encrusted. The melvin peck the salomon. The melvin peck the muire. The melvin does not visit the salomon. The salomon ease the winifield. The winifield protrude the salomon. The winifield does not eat the muire. The winifield is delusory. The winifield ease the melvin. The muire is blowzy. The muire peck the melvin. If something peck the melvin and the melvin is encrusted then the melvin protrude the winifield. If something peck the salomon and the salomon protrude the melvin then the melvin protrude the winifield. If something is discoidal then it ease the muire. If the salomon protrude the winifield then the salomon does not see the winifield. If something protrude the muire then it protrude the melvin. If something is encrusted and it protrude the winifield then the winifield is discoidal. If the muire is not undetected then the muire protrude the melvin. If something ease the melvin then the melvin does not see the winifield. The muire does not eat the melvin.", "logic": "\nProtrude(melvin, muire)\nEncrusted(melvin)\nPeck(melvin, salomon)\nPeck(melvin, muire)\nnot Ease(melvin, salomon)\nEase(salomon, winifield)\nProtrude(winifield, salomon)\nnot Protrude(winifield, muire)\nDelusory(winifield)\nEase(winifield, melvin)\nBlowzy(muire)\nPeck(muire, melvin)\nforall x (Peck(x, melvin) and Encrusted(melvin) -> Protrude(melvin, winifield))\nforall x (Peck(x, salomon) and Protrude(salomon, melvin) -> Protrude(melvin, winifield))\nforall x (Discoidal(x) -> Ease(x, muire))\nProtrude(salomon, winifield) -> not Peck(salomon, winifield)\nforall x (Protrude(x, muire) -> Protrude(x, melvin))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and Protrude(x, winifield) -> Discoidal(winifield))\nnot Undetected(muire) -> Protrude(muire, melvin)\nforall x (Ease(x, melvin) -> not Peck(melvin, winifield))\n\nnot Protrude(muire, melvin)\n\nforall x (Protrude(x, muire) -> Protrude(x, melvin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The vonni chop the penni. The vonni is anoestrous. The vonni scend the terrell. The vonni scend the penni. The vonni does not visit the terrell. The terrell idealize the shayna. The shayna chop the terrell. The shayna does not eat the penni. The shayna is prone. The shayna idealize the vonni. The penni is bacterioid. The penni scend the vonni. If something scend the vonni and the vonni is anoestrous then the vonni chop the shayna. If something scend the terrell and the terrell chop the vonni then the vonni chop the shayna. If something is adorned then it idealize the penni. If the terrell chop the shayna then the terrell does not see the shayna. If something chop the penni then it chop the vonni. If something is anoestrous and it chop the shayna then the shayna is adorned. If the penni is not lacy then the penni chop the vonni. If something idealize the vonni then the vonni does not see the shayna. The vonni idealize the penni.", "logic": "\nChop(vonni, penni)\nAnoestrous(vonni)\nScend(vonni, terrell)\nScend(vonni, penni)\nnot Idealize(vonni, terrell)\nIdealize(terrell, shayna)\nChop(shayna, terrell)\nnot Chop(shayna, penni)\nProne(shayna)\nIdealize(shayna, vonni)\nBacterioid(penni)\nScend(penni, vonni)\nforall x (Scend(x, vonni) and Anoestrous(vonni) -> Chop(vonni, shayna))\nforall x (Scend(x, terrell) and Chop(terrell, vonni) -> Chop(vonni, shayna))\nforall x (Adorned(x) -> Idealize(x, penni))\nChop(terrell, shayna) -> not Scend(terrell, shayna)\nforall x (Chop(x, penni) -> Chop(x, vonni))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and Chop(x, shayna) -> Adorned(shayna))\nnot Lacy(penni) -> Chop(penni, vonni)\nforall x (Idealize(x, vonni) -> not Scend(vonni, shayna))\n\nIdealize(vonni, penni)\n\nforall x (Adorned(x) -> Idealize(x, penni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The marni mummify the murdoch. The marni is unstarred. The marni threaten the esmerelda. The marni threaten the murdoch. The marni does not visit the esmerelda. The esmerelda glaciate the myrtice. The myrtice mummify the esmerelda. The myrtice does not eat the murdoch. The myrtice is himalayan. The myrtice glaciate the marni. The murdoch is pocketable. The murdoch threaten the marni. If something threaten the marni and the marni is unstarred then the marni mummify the myrtice. If something threaten the esmerelda and the esmerelda mummify the marni then the marni mummify the myrtice. If something is ecological then it glaciate the murdoch. If the esmerelda mummify the myrtice then the esmerelda does not see the myrtice. If something mummify the murdoch then it mummify the marni. If something is unstarred and it mummify the myrtice then the myrtice is ecological. If the murdoch is not nonverbal then the murdoch mummify the marni. If something glaciate the marni then the marni does not see the myrtice. The myrtice does not eat the marni.", "logic": "\nMummify(marni, murdoch)\nUnstarred(marni)\nThreaten(marni, esmerelda)\nThreaten(marni, murdoch)\nnot Glaciate(marni, esmerelda)\nGlaciate(esmerelda, myrtice)\nMummify(myrtice, esmerelda)\nnot Mummify(myrtice, murdoch)\nHimalayan(myrtice)\nGlaciate(myrtice, marni)\nPocketable(murdoch)\nThreaten(murdoch, marni)\nforall x (Threaten(x, marni) and Unstarred(marni) -> Mummify(marni, myrtice))\nforall x (Threaten(x, esmerelda) and Mummify(esmerelda, marni) -> Mummify(marni, myrtice))\nforall x (Ecological(x) -> Glaciate(x, murdoch))\nMummify(esmerelda, myrtice) -> not Threaten(esmerelda, myrtice)\nforall x (Mummify(x, murdoch) -> Mummify(x, marni))\nforall x (Unstarred(x) and Mummify(x, myrtice) -> Ecological(myrtice))\nnot Nonverbal(murdoch) -> Mummify(murdoch, marni)\nforall x (Glaciate(x, marni) -> not Threaten(marni, myrtice))\n\nnot Mummify(myrtice, marni)\n\nforall x (Mummify(x, murdoch) -> Mummify(x, marni)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The ichabod tinge the dane. The ichabod is aerophilic. The ichabod reverence the eustacia. The ichabod reverence the dane. The ichabod does not visit the eustacia. The eustacia confute the shaylynn. The shaylynn tinge the eustacia. The shaylynn does not eat the dane. The shaylynn is hindustani. The shaylynn confute the ichabod. The dane is cybernetic. The dane reverence the ichabod. If something reverence the ichabod and the ichabod is aerophilic then the ichabod tinge the shaylynn. If something reverence the eustacia and the eustacia tinge the ichabod then the ichabod tinge the shaylynn. If something is achromous then it confute the dane. If the eustacia tinge the shaylynn then the eustacia does not see the shaylynn. If something tinge the dane then it tinge the ichabod. If something is aerophilic and it tinge the shaylynn then the shaylynn is achromous. If the dane is not inapposite then the dane tinge the ichabod. If something confute the ichabod then the ichabod does not see the shaylynn. The dane confute the dane.", "logic": "\nTinge(ichabod, dane)\nAerophilic(ichabod)\nReverence(ichabod, eustacia)\nReverence(ichabod, dane)\nnot Confute(ichabod, eustacia)\nConfute(eustacia, shaylynn)\nTinge(shaylynn, eustacia)\nnot Tinge(shaylynn, dane)\nHindustani(shaylynn)\nConfute(shaylynn, ichabod)\nCybernetic(dane)\nReverence(dane, ichabod)\nforall x (Reverence(x, ichabod) and Aerophilic(ichabod) -> Tinge(ichabod, shaylynn))\nforall x (Reverence(x, eustacia) and Tinge(eustacia, ichabod) -> Tinge(ichabod, shaylynn))\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Confute(x, dane))\nTinge(eustacia, shaylynn) -> not Reverence(eustacia, shaylynn)\nforall x (Tinge(x, dane) -> Tinge(x, ichabod))\nforall x (Aerophilic(x) and Tinge(x, shaylynn) -> Achromous(shaylynn))\nnot Inapposite(dane) -> Tinge(dane, ichabod)\nforall x (Confute(x, ichabod) -> not Reverence(ichabod, shaylynn))\n\nConfute(dane, dane)\n\nforall x (Achromous(x) -> Confute(x, dane)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The cyrille defecate the aprilette. The cyrille is weakening. The cyrille unsay the yancey. The cyrille unsay the aprilette. The cyrille does not visit the yancey. The yancey tide the jared. The jared defecate the yancey. The jared does not eat the aprilette. The jared is friendly. The jared tide the cyrille. The aprilette is beguiled. The aprilette unsay the cyrille. If something unsay the cyrille and the cyrille is weakening then the cyrille defecate the jared. If something unsay the yancey and the yancey defecate the cyrille then the cyrille defecate the jared. If something is deltoid then it tide the aprilette. If the yancey defecate the jared then the yancey does not see the jared. If something defecate the aprilette then it defecate the cyrille. If something is weakening and it defecate the jared then the jared is deltoid. If the aprilette is not degage then the aprilette defecate the cyrille. If something tide the cyrille then the cyrille does not see the jared. The aprilette does not eat the yancey.", "logic": "\nDefecate(cyrille, aprilette)\nWeakening(cyrille)\nUnsay(cyrille, yancey)\nUnsay(cyrille, aprilette)\nnot Tide(cyrille, yancey)\nTide(yancey, jared)\nDefecate(jared, yancey)\nnot Defecate(jared, aprilette)\nFriendly(jared)\nTide(jared, cyrille)\nBeguiled(aprilette)\nUnsay(aprilette, cyrille)\nforall x (Unsay(x, cyrille) and Weakening(cyrille) -> Defecate(cyrille, jared))\nforall x (Unsay(x, yancey) and Defecate(yancey, cyrille) -> Defecate(cyrille, jared))\nforall x (Deltoid(x) -> Tide(x, aprilette))\nDefecate(yancey, jared) -> not Unsay(yancey, jared)\nforall x (Defecate(x, aprilette) -> Defecate(x, cyrille))\nforall x (Weakening(x) and Defecate(x, jared) -> Deltoid(jared))\nnot Degage(aprilette) -> Defecate(aprilette, cyrille)\nforall x (Tide(x, cyrille) -> not Unsay(cyrille, jared))\n\nnot Defecate(aprilette, yancey)\n\nnot Defecate(aprilette, yancey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The josy befoul the mildrid. The josy is fricative. The josy filet the cassey. The josy filet the mildrid. The josy does not visit the cassey. The cassey inventory the arline. The arline befoul the cassey. The arline does not eat the mildrid. The arline is slight. The arline inventory the josy. The mildrid is unpompous. The mildrid filet the josy. If something filet the josy and the josy is fricative then the josy befoul the arline. If something filet the cassey and the cassey befoul the josy then the josy befoul the arline. If something is rootless then it inventory the mildrid. If the cassey befoul the arline then the cassey does not see the arline. If something befoul the mildrid then it befoul the josy. If something is fricative and it befoul the arline then the arline is rootless. If the mildrid is not sounding then the mildrid befoul the josy. If something inventory the josy then the josy does not see the arline. The josy is unpompous.", "logic": "\nBefoul(josy, mildrid)\nFricative(josy)\nFilet(josy, cassey)\nFilet(josy, mildrid)\nnot Inventory(josy, cassey)\nInventory(cassey, arline)\nBefoul(arline, cassey)\nnot Befoul(arline, mildrid)\nSlight(arline)\nInventory(arline, josy)\nUnpompous(mildrid)\nFilet(mildrid, josy)\nforall x (Filet(x, josy) and Fricative(josy) -> Befoul(josy, arline))\nforall x (Filet(x, cassey) and Befoul(cassey, josy) -> Befoul(josy, arline))\nforall x (Rootless(x) -> Inventory(x, mildrid))\nBefoul(cassey, arline) -> not Filet(cassey, arline)\nforall x (Befoul(x, mildrid) -> Befoul(x, josy))\nforall x (Fricative(x) and Befoul(x, arline) -> Rootless(arline))\nnot Sounding(mildrid) -> Befoul(mildrid, josy)\nforall x (Inventory(x, josy) -> not Filet(josy, arline))\n\nUnpompous(josy)\n\nUnpompous(josy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The dorri terrify the john. The dorri is proverbial. The dorri commit the neile. The dorri commit the john. The dorri does not visit the neile. The neile hiccup the iggy. The iggy terrify the neile. The iggy does not eat the john. The iggy is oceangoing. The iggy hiccup the dorri. The john is planned. The john commit the dorri. If something commit the dorri and the dorri is proverbial then the dorri terrify the iggy. If something commit the neile and the neile terrify the dorri then the dorri terrify the iggy. If something is annulate then it hiccup the john. If the neile terrify the iggy then the neile does not see the iggy. If something terrify the john then it terrify the dorri. If something is proverbial and it terrify the iggy then the iggy is annulate. If the john is not gingery then the john terrify the dorri. If something hiccup the dorri then the dorri does not see the iggy. The john is not proverbial.", "logic": "\nTerrify(dorri, john)\nProverbial(dorri)\nCommit(dorri, neile)\nCommit(dorri, john)\nnot Hiccup(dorri, neile)\nHiccup(neile, iggy)\nTerrify(iggy, neile)\nnot Terrify(iggy, john)\nOceangoing(iggy)\nHiccup(iggy, dorri)\nPlanned(john)\nCommit(john, dorri)\nforall x (Commit(x, dorri) and Proverbial(dorri) -> Terrify(dorri, iggy))\nforall x (Commit(x, neile) and Terrify(neile, dorri) -> Terrify(dorri, iggy))\nforall x (Annulate(x) -> Hiccup(x, john))\nTerrify(neile, iggy) -> not Commit(neile, iggy)\nforall x (Terrify(x, john) -> Terrify(x, dorri))\nforall x (Proverbial(x) and Terrify(x, iggy) -> Annulate(iggy))\nnot Gingery(john) -> Terrify(john, dorri)\nforall x (Hiccup(x, dorri) -> not Commit(dorri, iggy))\n\nnot Proverbial(john)\n\nnot Proverbial(john) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "The marcelo tally the carlyn. The marcelo is filmy. The marcelo subpoena the ken. The marcelo subpoena the carlyn. The marcelo does not visit the ken. The ken suntan the barnebas. The barnebas tally the ken. The barnebas does not eat the carlyn. The barnebas is rangy. The barnebas suntan the marcelo. The carlyn is some. The carlyn subpoena the marcelo. If something subpoena the marcelo and the marcelo is filmy then the marcelo tally the barnebas. If something subpoena the ken and the ken tally the marcelo then the marcelo tally the barnebas. If something is benzoic then it suntan the carlyn. If the ken tally the barnebas then the ken does not see the barnebas. If something tally the carlyn then it tally the marcelo. If something is filmy and it tally the barnebas then the barnebas is benzoic. If the carlyn is not tomentous then the carlyn tally the marcelo. If something suntan the marcelo then the marcelo does not see the barnebas. The marcelo suntan the marcelo.", "logic": "\nTally(marcelo, carlyn)\nFilmy(marcelo)\nSubpoena(marcelo, ken)\nSubpoena(marcelo, carlyn)\nnot Suntan(marcelo, ken)\nSuntan(ken, barnebas)\nTally(barnebas, ken)\nnot Tally(barnebas, carlyn)\nRangy(barnebas)\nSuntan(barnebas, marcelo)\nSome(carlyn)\nSubpoena(carlyn, marcelo)\nforall x (Subpoena(x, marcelo) and Filmy(marcelo) -> Tally(marcelo, barnebas))\nforall x (Subpoena(x, ken) and Tally(ken, marcelo) -> Tally(marcelo, barnebas))\nforall x (Benzoic(x) -> Suntan(x, carlyn))\nTally(ken, barnebas) -> not Subpoena(ken, barnebas)\nforall x (Tally(x, carlyn) -> Tally(x, marcelo))\nforall x (Filmy(x) and Tally(x, barnebas) -> Benzoic(barnebas))\nnot Tomentous(carlyn) -> Tally(carlyn, marcelo)\nforall x (Suntan(x, marcelo) -> not Subpoena(marcelo, barnebas))\n\nSuntan(marcelo, marcelo)\n\nSuntan(marcelo, marcelo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1380"} {"premises": "Chan is aciduric. Elenore is glaring. Joy is antitumor. If someone is antitumor and saccadic then they are glaring. All glaring people are amniotic. All accustomed, amniotic people are priggish. Elenore is glaring.", "logic": "\nAciduric(chan)\nGlaring(elenore)\nAntitumor(joy)\nforall x (Antitumor(x) and Saccadic(x) -> Glaring(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) -> Amniotic(x))\nforall x (Accustomed(x) and Amniotic(x) -> Priggish(x))\n\nGlaring(elenore)\n\ntherefore Glaring(elenore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "Britta is saved. Daphene is diluvian. Nerty is untapped. If someone is untapped and immiscible then they are diluvian. All diluvian people are aphasic. All sacred, aphasic people are irrelevant. Nerty is not untapped.", "logic": "\nSaved(britta)\nDiluvian(daphene)\nUntapped(nerty)\nforall x (Untapped(x) and Immiscible(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Diluvian(x) -> Aphasic(x))\nforall x (Sacred(x) and Aphasic(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\n\nnot Untapped(nerty)\n\ntherefore Untapped(nerty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "Kimmie is laggard. Willem is pestilent. Anny is vapourish. If someone is vapourish and koranic then they are pestilent. All pestilent people are achievable. All flowing, achievable people are weatherly. Willem is achievable.", "logic": "\nLaggard(kimmie)\nPestilent(willem)\nVapourish(anny)\nforall x (Vapourish(x) and Koranic(x) -> Pestilent(x))\nforall x (Pestilent(x) -> Achievable(x))\nforall x (Flowing(x) and Achievable(x) -> Weatherly(x))\n\nAchievable(willem)\n\nPestilent(willem) and forall x (Pestilent(x) -> Achievable(x)) -> therefore Achievable(willem)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "Jordan is outlawed. Barnard is boring. Sena is epicarpal. If someone is epicarpal and pentatonic then they are boring. All boring people are clouded. All unfathomed, clouded people are united. Barnard is not clouded.", "logic": "\nOutlawed(jordan)\nBoring(barnard)\nEpicarpal(sena)\nforall x (Epicarpal(x) and Pentatonic(x) -> Boring(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Clouded(x))\nforall x (Unfathomed(x) and Clouded(x) -> United(x))\n\nnot Clouded(barnard)\n\nBoring(barnard) and forall x (Boring(x) -> Clouded(x)) -> therefore Clouded(barnard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "Normand is unoriented. Anselma is askew. Theobald is stoic. If someone is stoic and woolly then they are askew. All askew people are ingenuous. All hearing, ingenuous people are carinal. Theobald is not ingenuous.", "logic": "\nUnoriented(normand)\nAskew(anselma)\nStoic(theobald)\nforall x (Stoic(x) and Woolly(x) -> Askew(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) -> Ingenuous(x))\nforall x (Hearing(x) and Ingenuous(x) -> Carinal(x))\n\nnot Ingenuous(theobald)\n\nforall x (Askew(x) -> Ingenuous(x)) <- forall x (Stoic(x) and Woolly(x) -> Askew(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "Laina is monophonic. Caria is just. Jessee is snappish. If someone is snappish and weensy then they are just. All just people are rampageous. All ametabolic, rampageous people are partizan. Laina is partizan.", "logic": "\nMonophonic(laina)\nJust(caria)\nSnappish(jessee)\nforall x (Snappish(x) and Weensy(x) -> Just(x))\nforall x (Just(x) -> Rampageous(x))\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) and Rampageous(x) -> Partizan(x))\n\nPartizan(laina)\n\nforall x (Ametabolic(x) and Rampageous(x) -> Partizan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "Gertrudis is intimal. Nolan is shuddery. Tadd is severable. If someone is severable and grouchy then they are shuddery. All shuddery people are ideologic. All anorexic, ideologic people are validating. Nolan is not grouchy.", "logic": "\nIntimal(gertrudis)\nShuddery(nolan)\nSeverable(tadd)\nforall x (Severable(x) and Grouchy(x) -> Shuddery(x))\nforall x (Shuddery(x) -> Ideologic(x))\nforall x (Anorexic(x) and Ideologic(x) -> Validating(x))\n\nnot Grouchy(nolan)\n\nnot Grouchy(nolan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "Judas is sown. August is aspirant. Rozella is certain. If someone is certain and fictile then they are aspirant. All aspirant people are homoerotic. All famed, homoerotic people are spinnbar. August is famed.", "logic": "\nSown(judas)\nAspirant(august)\nCertain(rozella)\nforall x (Certain(x) and Fictile(x) -> Aspirant(x))\nforall x (Aspirant(x) -> Homoerotic(x))\nforall x (Famed(x) and Homoerotic(x) -> Spinnbar(x))\n\nFamed(august)\n\nFamed(august) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3256"} {"premises": "The berke is southmost. The berke is youngish. The berke is early. The berke mildew the tudor. The berke inform the tudor. The berke carpet the tudor. The tudor is southmost. The tudor is moslem. The tudor mildew the berke. The tudor carpet the berke. If someone is early then they see the tudor. If someone is moslem then they see the berke. The tudor is southmost.", "logic": "\nSouthmost(berke)\nYoungish(berke)\nEarly(berke)\nMildew(berke, tudor)\nInform(berke, tudor)\nCarpet(berke, tudor)\nSouthmost(tudor)\nMoslem(tudor)\nMildew(tudor, berke)\nCarpet(tudor, berke)\nforall x (Early(x) -> Inform(x, tudor))\nforall x (Moslem(x) -> Inform(x, berke))\n\nSouthmost(tudor)\n\ntherefore Southmost(tudor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "The andromeda is numerical. The andromeda is corporeal. The andromeda is five. The andromeda exalt the tim. The andromeda reassemble the tim. The andromeda coconspire the tim. The tim is numerical. The tim is unaccented. The tim exalt the andromeda. The tim coconspire the andromeda. If someone is five then they see the tim. If someone is unaccented then they see the andromeda. The tim does not visit the andromeda.", "logic": "\nNumerical(andromeda)\nCorporeal(andromeda)\nFive(andromeda)\nExalt(andromeda, tim)\nReassemble(andromeda, tim)\nCoconspire(andromeda, tim)\nNumerical(tim)\nUnaccented(tim)\nExalt(tim, andromeda)\nCoconspire(tim, andromeda)\nforall x (Five(x) -> Reassemble(x, tim))\nforall x (Unaccented(x) -> Reassemble(x, andromeda))\n\nnot Coconspire(tim, andromeda)\n\ntherefore Coconspire(tim, andromeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "The francoise is gelid. The francoise is xciii. The francoise is panamanian. The francoise reassign the charlot. The francoise nasale the charlot. The francoise clack the charlot. The charlot is gelid. The charlot is undesigned. The charlot reassign the francoise. The charlot clack the francoise. If someone is panamanian then they see the charlot. If someone is undesigned then they see the francoise. The charlot does not see the charlot.", "logic": "\nGelid(francoise)\nXciii(francoise)\nPanamanian(francoise)\nReassign(francoise, charlot)\nNasale(francoise, charlot)\nClack(francoise, charlot)\nGelid(charlot)\nUndesigned(charlot)\nReassign(charlot, francoise)\nClack(charlot, francoise)\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Nasale(x, charlot))\nforall x (Undesigned(x) -> Nasale(x, francoise))\n\nnot Nasale(charlot, charlot)\n\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Nasale(x, charlot)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "The merill is uninominal. The merill is defective. The merill is informal. The merill thrum the georgiana. The merill bloom the georgiana. The merill oxidize the georgiana. The georgiana is uninominal. The georgiana is coordinate. The georgiana thrum the merill. The georgiana oxidize the merill. If someone is informal then they see the georgiana. If someone is coordinate then they see the merill. The merill is kind.", "logic": "\nUninominal(merill)\nDefective(merill)\nInformal(merill)\nThrum(merill, georgiana)\nBloom(merill, georgiana)\nOxidize(merill, georgiana)\nUninominal(georgiana)\nCoordinate(georgiana)\nThrum(georgiana, merill)\nOxidize(georgiana, merill)\nforall x (Informal(x) -> Bloom(x, georgiana))\nforall x (Coordinate(x) -> Bloom(x, merill))\n\nKind(merill)\n\nKind(merill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "Minetta is dismaying. Minetta is pyaemic. Minetta is not gold. Minetta is not jointed. Minetta is corporal. Vicky is caecilian. Mavis is not dismaying. Mavis is gold. Mavis is bimotored. Mavis is caecilian. Mavis is jointed. Sharl is dismaying. All corporal things are not caecilian. Mavis is jointed.", "logic": "\nDismaying(minetta)\nPyaemic(minetta)\nnot Gold(minetta)\nnot Jointed(minetta)\nCorporal(minetta)\nCaecilian(vicky)\nnot Dismaying(mavis)\nGold(mavis)\nBimotored(mavis)\nCaecilian(mavis)\nJointed(mavis)\nDismaying(sharl)\nforall x (Corporal(x) -> not Caecilian(x))\n\nJointed(mavis)\n\ntherefore Jointed(mavis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Venita is neurotic. Venita is hulking. Venita is not qualified. Venita is not bivalved. Venita is alkylic. Darelle is shaggy. Starr is not neurotic. Starr is qualified. Starr is tiddly. Starr is shaggy. Starr is bivalved. Napoleon is neurotic. All alkylic things are not shaggy. Starr is not shaggy.", "logic": "\nNeurotic(venita)\nHulking(venita)\nnot Qualified(venita)\nnot Bivalved(venita)\nAlkylic(venita)\nShaggy(darelle)\nnot Neurotic(starr)\nQualified(starr)\nTiddly(starr)\nShaggy(starr)\nBivalved(starr)\nNeurotic(napoleon)\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> not Shaggy(x))\n\nnot Shaggy(starr)\n\ntherefore Shaggy(starr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Suzan is straw. Suzan is southward. Suzan is not savoury. Suzan is not milanese. Suzan is prenatal. Jessey is absorbable. Ronny is not straw. Ronny is savoury. Ronny is dirigible. Ronny is absorbable. Ronny is milanese. Charlotte is straw. All prenatal things are not absorbable. Suzan is not absorbable.", "logic": "\nStraw(suzan)\nSouthward(suzan)\nnot Savoury(suzan)\nnot Milanese(suzan)\nPrenatal(suzan)\nAbsorbable(jessey)\nnot Straw(ronny)\nSavoury(ronny)\nDirigible(ronny)\nAbsorbable(ronny)\nMilanese(ronny)\nStraw(charlotte)\nforall x (Prenatal(x) -> not Absorbable(x))\n\nnot Absorbable(suzan)\n\nPrenatal(suzan) and forall x (Prenatal(x) -> not Absorbable(x)) -> therefore not Absorbable(suzan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Dacie is proustian. Dacie is pierced. Dacie is not inboard. Dacie is not atonal. Dacie is untamed. Demeter is symphonic. Albertine is not proustian. Albertine is inboard. Albertine is revealing. Albertine is symphonic. Albertine is atonal. Nolan is proustian. All untamed things are not symphonic. Dacie is symphonic.", "logic": "\nProustian(dacie)\nPierced(dacie)\nnot Inboard(dacie)\nnot Atonal(dacie)\nUntamed(dacie)\nSymphonic(demeter)\nnot Proustian(albertine)\nInboard(albertine)\nRevealing(albertine)\nSymphonic(albertine)\nAtonal(albertine)\nProustian(nolan)\nforall x (Untamed(x) -> not Symphonic(x))\n\nSymphonic(dacie)\n\nUntamed(dacie) and forall x (Untamed(x) -> not Symphonic(x)) -> therefore not Symphonic(dacie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Sonny is foliolate. Sonny is oblivious. Sonny is not fiducial. Sonny is not hazy. Sonny is booming. Marcello is canonized. Silvain is not foliolate. Silvain is fiducial. Silvain is tumultuous. Silvain is canonized. Silvain is hazy. Kristel is foliolate. All booming things are not canonized. Silvain is not booming.", "logic": "\nFoliolate(sonny)\nOblivious(sonny)\nnot Fiducial(sonny)\nnot Hazy(sonny)\nBooming(sonny)\nCanonized(marcello)\nnot Foliolate(silvain)\nFiducial(silvain)\nTumultuous(silvain)\nCanonized(silvain)\nHazy(silvain)\nFoliolate(kristel)\nforall x (Booming(x) -> not Canonized(x))\n\nnot Booming(silvain)\n\nnot Booming(silvain) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Wyatan is skilful. Wyatan is stiff. Wyatan is not famous. Wyatan is not diffuse. Wyatan is emotional. Lina is unrelieved. Evie is not skilful. Evie is famous. Evie is rakish. Evie is unrelieved. Evie is diffuse. Layton is skilful. All emotional things are not unrelieved. Lina is stiff.", "logic": "\nSkilful(wyatan)\nStiff(wyatan)\nnot Famous(wyatan)\nnot Diffuse(wyatan)\nEmotional(wyatan)\nUnrelieved(lina)\nnot Skilful(evie)\nFamous(evie)\nRakish(evie)\nUnrelieved(evie)\nDiffuse(evie)\nSkilful(layton)\nforall x (Emotional(x) -> not Unrelieved(x))\n\nStiff(lina)\n\nStiff(lina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Cindi is winking. Cindi is isoclinal. Cindi is not taxpaying. Cindi is not bentonitic. Cindi is autumnal. Joshua is visualised. Tucker is not winking. Tucker is taxpaying. Tucker is colored. Tucker is visualised. Tucker is bentonitic. Blaire is winking. All autumnal things are not visualised. Joshua is not taxpaying.", "logic": "\nWinking(cindi)\nIsoclinal(cindi)\nnot Taxpaying(cindi)\nnot Bentonitic(cindi)\nAutumnal(cindi)\nVisualised(joshua)\nnot Winking(tucker)\nTaxpaying(tucker)\nColored(tucker)\nVisualised(tucker)\nBentonitic(tucker)\nWinking(blaire)\nforall x (Autumnal(x) -> not Visualised(x))\n\nnot Taxpaying(joshua)\n\nnot Taxpaying(joshua) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Carry is ninetieth. Carry is spastic. Carry is not convoluted. Carry is not danish. Carry is unflurried. Abram is homologous. Kaleena is not ninetieth. Kaleena is convoluted. Kaleena is priestly. Kaleena is homologous. Kaleena is danish. Viviana is ninetieth. All unflurried things are not homologous. Viviana is unflurried.", "logic": "\nNinetieth(carry)\nSpastic(carry)\nnot Convoluted(carry)\nnot Danish(carry)\nUnflurried(carry)\nHomologous(abram)\nnot Ninetieth(kaleena)\nConvoluted(kaleena)\nPriestly(kaleena)\nHomologous(kaleena)\nDanish(kaleena)\nNinetieth(viviana)\nforall x (Unflurried(x) -> not Homologous(x))\n\nUnflurried(viviana)\n\nUnflurried(viviana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1747"} {"premises": "Thurstan is allover. Darline is muscovite. Darline is lobular. Melisse is small. Melisse is muscovite. Nick is not small. Nick is muscovite. If something is erotic then it is fortissimo. All lobular things are allover. White things are erotic. All lobular, erotic things are not next. If Melisse is lobular and Melisse is not fortissimo then Melisse is not muscovite. If something is allover and not next then it is small. Darline is muscovite.", "logic": "\nAllover(thurstan)\nMuscovite(darline)\nLobular(darline)\nSmall(melisse)\nMuscovite(melisse)\nnot Small(nick)\nMuscovite(nick)\nforall x (Erotic(x) -> Fortissimo(x))\nforall x (Lobular(x) -> Allover(x))\nforall x (Allover(x) -> Erotic(x))\nforall x (Lobular(x) and Erotic(x) -> not Next(x))\nLobular(melisse) and not Fortissimo(melisse) -> not Muscovite(melisse)\nforall x (Allover(x) and not Next(x) -> Small(x))\n\nMuscovite(darline)\n\ntherefore Muscovite(darline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Leena is sapless. Elna is leprose. Elna is solomonic. Betta is perineal. Betta is leprose. Tella is not perineal. Tella is leprose. If something is trite then it is repugnant. All solomonic things are sapless. White things are trite. All solomonic, trite things are not cordial. If Betta is solomonic and Betta is not repugnant then Betta is not leprose. If something is sapless and not cordial then it is perineal. Elna is not leprose.", "logic": "\nSapless(leena)\nLeprose(elna)\nSolomonic(elna)\nPerineal(betta)\nLeprose(betta)\nnot Perineal(tella)\nLeprose(tella)\nforall x (Trite(x) -> Repugnant(x))\nforall x (Solomonic(x) -> Sapless(x))\nforall x (Sapless(x) -> Trite(x))\nforall x (Solomonic(x) and Trite(x) -> not Cordial(x))\nSolomonic(betta) and not Repugnant(betta) -> not Leprose(betta)\nforall x (Sapless(x) and not Cordial(x) -> Perineal(x))\n\nnot Leprose(elna)\n\ntherefore Leprose(elna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Vera is graphical. Joana is compulsory. Joana is junior. Kaiser is sensible. Kaiser is compulsory. Clarke is not sensible. Clarke is compulsory. If something is numeral then it is gambian. All junior things are graphical. White things are numeral. All junior, numeral things are not xcviii. If Kaiser is junior and Kaiser is not gambian then Kaiser is not compulsory. If something is graphical and not xcviii then it is sensible. Joana is graphical.", "logic": "\nGraphical(vera)\nCompulsory(joana)\nJunior(joana)\nSensible(kaiser)\nCompulsory(kaiser)\nnot Sensible(clarke)\nCompulsory(clarke)\nforall x (Numeral(x) -> Gambian(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) -> Graphical(x))\nforall x (Graphical(x) -> Numeral(x))\nforall x (Junior(x) and Numeral(x) -> not Xcviii(x))\nJunior(kaiser) and not Gambian(kaiser) -> not Compulsory(kaiser)\nforall x (Graphical(x) and not Xcviii(x) -> Sensible(x))\n\nGraphical(joana)\n\nJunior(joana) and forall x (Junior(x) -> Graphical(x)) -> therefore Graphical(joana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Modesty is twinning. Tory is anatropous. Tory is buddhist. Fremont is unitary. Fremont is anatropous. Inez is not unitary. Inez is anatropous. If something is biotic then it is vermillion. All buddhist things are twinning. White things are biotic. All buddhist, biotic things are not distal. If Fremont is buddhist and Fremont is not vermillion then Fremont is not anatropous. If something is twinning and not distal then it is unitary. Tory is not twinning.", "logic": "\nTwinning(modesty)\nAnatropous(tory)\nBuddhist(tory)\nUnitary(fremont)\nAnatropous(fremont)\nnot Unitary(inez)\nAnatropous(inez)\nforall x (Biotic(x) -> Vermillion(x))\nforall x (Buddhist(x) -> Twinning(x))\nforall x (Twinning(x) -> Biotic(x))\nforall x (Buddhist(x) and Biotic(x) -> not Distal(x))\nBuddhist(fremont) and not Vermillion(fremont) -> not Anatropous(fremont)\nforall x (Twinning(x) and not Distal(x) -> Unitary(x))\n\nnot Twinning(tory)\n\nBuddhist(tory) and forall x (Buddhist(x) -> Twinning(x)) -> therefore Twinning(tory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Chandra is breeched. Stephan is enveloping. Stephan is hollywood. Cecelia is regulatory. Cecelia is enveloping. Anthia is not regulatory. Anthia is enveloping. If something is trichrome then it is fixed. All hollywood things are breeched. White things are trichrome. All hollywood, trichrome things are not interred. If Cecelia is hollywood and Cecelia is not fixed then Cecelia is not enveloping. If something is breeched and not interred then it is regulatory. Stephan is trichrome.", "logic": "\nBreeched(chandra)\nEnveloping(stephan)\nHollywood(stephan)\nRegulatory(cecelia)\nEnveloping(cecelia)\nnot Regulatory(anthia)\nEnveloping(anthia)\nforall x (Trichrome(x) -> Fixed(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) -> Breeched(x))\nforall x (Breeched(x) -> Trichrome(x))\nforall x (Hollywood(x) and Trichrome(x) -> not Interred(x))\nHollywood(cecelia) and not Fixed(cecelia) -> not Enveloping(cecelia)\nforall x (Breeched(x) and not Interred(x) -> Regulatory(x))\n\nTrichrome(stephan)\n\nHollywood(stephan) and forall x (Hollywood(x) -> Breeched(x)) -> therefore Breeched(stephan) Breeched(stephan) and forall x (Breeched(x) -> Trichrome(x)) -> therefore Trichrome(stephan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Alysia is flint. Candida is purposeful. Candida is evasive. Silvie is necessary. Silvie is purposeful. Jon is not necessary. Jon is purposeful. If something is slippery then it is tactless. All evasive things are flint. White things are slippery. All evasive, slippery things are not cozy. If Silvie is evasive and Silvie is not tactless then Silvie is not purposeful. If something is flint and not cozy then it is necessary. Candida is not slippery.", "logic": "\nFlint(alysia)\nPurposeful(candida)\nEvasive(candida)\nNecessary(silvie)\nPurposeful(silvie)\nnot Necessary(jon)\nPurposeful(jon)\nforall x (Slippery(x) -> Tactless(x))\nforall x (Evasive(x) -> Flint(x))\nforall x (Flint(x) -> Slippery(x))\nforall x (Evasive(x) and Slippery(x) -> not Cozy(x))\nEvasive(silvie) and not Tactless(silvie) -> not Purposeful(silvie)\nforall x (Flint(x) and not Cozy(x) -> Necessary(x))\n\nnot Slippery(candida)\n\nEvasive(candida) and forall x (Evasive(x) -> Flint(x)) -> therefore Flint(candida) Flint(candida) and forall x (Flint(x) -> Slippery(x)) -> therefore Slippery(candida)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Daffi is advancing. Chrisy is struck. Chrisy is brainish. Gordan is idyllic. Gordan is struck. Annadiana is not idyllic. Annadiana is struck. If something is gracious then it is rested. All brainish things are advancing. White things are gracious. All brainish, gracious things are not sikh. If Gordan is brainish and Gordan is not rested then Gordan is not struck. If something is advancing and not sikh then it is idyllic. Chrisy is not sikh.", "logic": "\nAdvancing(daffi)\nStruck(chrisy)\nBrainish(chrisy)\nIdyllic(gordan)\nStruck(gordan)\nnot Idyllic(annadiana)\nStruck(annadiana)\nforall x (Gracious(x) -> Rested(x))\nforall x (Brainish(x) -> Advancing(x))\nforall x (Advancing(x) -> Gracious(x))\nforall x (Brainish(x) and Gracious(x) -> not Sikh(x))\nBrainish(gordan) and not Rested(gordan) -> not Struck(gordan)\nforall x (Advancing(x) and not Sikh(x) -> Idyllic(x))\n\nnot Sikh(chrisy)\n\nBrainish(chrisy) and forall x (Brainish(x) -> Advancing(x)) -> therefore Advancing(chrisy) Advancing(chrisy) and forall x (Advancing(x) -> Gracious(x)) -> therefore Gracious(chrisy) Brainish(chrisy) and Gracious(chrisy) and forall x (Brainish(x) and Gracious(x) -> not Sikh(x)) -> therefore not Sikh(chrisy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Basil is sore. Tamra is odious. Tamra is tiled. Sharona is insatiate. Sharona is odious. Gavriel is not insatiate. Gavriel is odious. If something is avian then it is unnerved. All tiled things are sore. White things are avian. All tiled, avian things are not galore. If Sharona is tiled and Sharona is not unnerved then Sharona is not odious. If something is sore and not galore then it is insatiate. Tamra is galore.", "logic": "\nSore(basil)\nOdious(tamra)\nTiled(tamra)\nInsatiate(sharona)\nOdious(sharona)\nnot Insatiate(gavriel)\nOdious(gavriel)\nforall x (Avian(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Tiled(x) -> Sore(x))\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Avian(x))\nforall x (Tiled(x) and Avian(x) -> not Galore(x))\nTiled(sharona) and not Unnerved(sharona) -> not Odious(sharona)\nforall x (Sore(x) and not Galore(x) -> Insatiate(x))\n\nGalore(tamra)\n\nTiled(tamra) and forall x (Tiled(x) -> Sore(x)) -> therefore Sore(tamra) Sore(tamra) and forall x (Sore(x) -> Avian(x)) -> therefore Avian(tamra) Tiled(tamra) and Avian(tamra) and forall x (Tiled(x) and Avian(x) -> not Galore(x)) -> therefore not Galore(tamra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Merilee is written. Lonnie is disjoint. Lonnie is ultrasonic. Pen is french. Pen is disjoint. Rhetta is not french. Rhetta is disjoint. If something is swift then it is eyelike. All ultrasonic things are written. White things are swift. All ultrasonic, swift things are not plushy. If Pen is ultrasonic and Pen is not eyelike then Pen is not disjoint. If something is written and not plushy then it is french. Merilee is not french.", "logic": "\nWritten(merilee)\nDisjoint(lonnie)\nUltrasonic(lonnie)\nFrench(pen)\nDisjoint(pen)\nnot French(rhetta)\nDisjoint(rhetta)\nforall x (Swift(x) -> Eyelike(x))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) -> Written(x))\nforall x (Written(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) and Swift(x) -> not Plushy(x))\nUltrasonic(pen) and not Eyelike(pen) -> not Disjoint(pen)\nforall x (Written(x) and not Plushy(x) -> French(x))\n\nnot French(merilee)\n\nforall x (Written(x) and not Plushy(x) -> French(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Dix is irritating. Vera is hindering. Vera is unmilitary. Zalman is wheezing. Zalman is hindering. Maxy is not wheezing. Maxy is hindering. If something is frangible then it is nucleated. All unmilitary things are irritating. White things are frangible. All unmilitary, frangible things are not grumous. If Zalman is unmilitary and Zalman is not nucleated then Zalman is not hindering. If something is irritating and not grumous then it is wheezing. Maxy is frangible.", "logic": "\nIrritating(dix)\nHindering(vera)\nUnmilitary(vera)\nWheezing(zalman)\nHindering(zalman)\nnot Wheezing(maxy)\nHindering(maxy)\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> Nucleated(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) -> Irritating(x))\nforall x (Irritating(x) -> Frangible(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Frangible(x) -> not Grumous(x))\nUnmilitary(zalman) and not Nucleated(zalman) -> not Hindering(zalman)\nforall x (Irritating(x) and not Grumous(x) -> Wheezing(x))\n\nFrangible(maxy)\n\nforall x (Irritating(x) -> Frangible(x)) <- forall x (Unmilitary(x) -> Irritating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Deidre is modifiable. Rita is schoolwide. Rita is ugly. Roth is unfeigned. Roth is schoolwide. Florette is not unfeigned. Florette is schoolwide. If something is scandalous then it is dress. All ugly things are modifiable. White things are scandalous. All ugly, scandalous things are not polyphonic. If Roth is ugly and Roth is not dress then Roth is not schoolwide. If something is modifiable and not polyphonic then it is unfeigned. Florette is not modifiable.", "logic": "\nModifiable(deidre)\nSchoolwide(rita)\nUgly(rita)\nUnfeigned(roth)\nSchoolwide(roth)\nnot Unfeigned(florette)\nSchoolwide(florette)\nforall x (Scandalous(x) -> Dress(x))\nforall x (Ugly(x) -> Modifiable(x))\nforall x (Modifiable(x) -> Scandalous(x))\nforall x (Ugly(x) and Scandalous(x) -> not Polyphonic(x))\nUgly(roth) and not Dress(roth) -> not Schoolwide(roth)\nforall x (Modifiable(x) and not Polyphonic(x) -> Unfeigned(x))\n\nnot Modifiable(florette)\n\nforall x (Ugly(x) -> Modifiable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Oliver is tilted. Sherri is cataleptic. Sherri is discordant. Faustine is factual. Faustine is cataleptic. Sarena is not factual. Sarena is cataleptic. If something is productive then it is bulgy. All discordant things are tilted. White things are productive. All discordant, productive things are not aciduric. If Faustine is discordant and Faustine is not bulgy then Faustine is not cataleptic. If something is tilted and not aciduric then it is factual. Faustine is bulgy.", "logic": "\nTilted(oliver)\nCataleptic(sherri)\nDiscordant(sherri)\nFactual(faustine)\nCataleptic(faustine)\nnot Factual(sarena)\nCataleptic(sarena)\nforall x (Productive(x) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) -> Tilted(x))\nforall x (Tilted(x) -> Productive(x))\nforall x (Discordant(x) and Productive(x) -> not Aciduric(x))\nDiscordant(faustine) and not Bulgy(faustine) -> not Cataleptic(faustine)\nforall x (Tilted(x) and not Aciduric(x) -> Factual(x))\n\nBulgy(faustine)\n\nforall x (Productive(x) -> Bulgy(x)) <- forall x (Tilted(x) -> Productive(x)) <- forall x (Discordant(x) -> Tilted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Ashlie is exotic. Mame is lucky. Mame is polemic. Zorah is multilevel. Zorah is lucky. Pearline is not multilevel. Pearline is lucky. If something is beat then it is advancing. All polemic things are exotic. White things are beat. All polemic, beat things are not grainy. If Zorah is polemic and Zorah is not advancing then Zorah is not lucky. If something is exotic and not grainy then it is multilevel. Zorah is not grainy.", "logic": "\nExotic(ashlie)\nLucky(mame)\nPolemic(mame)\nMultilevel(zorah)\nLucky(zorah)\nnot Multilevel(pearline)\nLucky(pearline)\nforall x (Beat(x) -> Advancing(x))\nforall x (Polemic(x) -> Exotic(x))\nforall x (Exotic(x) -> Beat(x))\nforall x (Polemic(x) and Beat(x) -> not Grainy(x))\nPolemic(zorah) and not Advancing(zorah) -> not Lucky(zorah)\nforall x (Exotic(x) and not Grainy(x) -> Multilevel(x))\n\nnot Grainy(zorah)\n\nnot Grainy(zorah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Albina is serologic. Katrine is more. Katrine is citric. Elli is amatory. Elli is more. Chloe is not amatory. Chloe is more. If something is aweless then it is catamenial. All citric things are serologic. White things are aweless. All citric, aweless things are not proximate. If Elli is citric and Elli is not catamenial then Elli is not more. If something is serologic and not proximate then it is amatory. Albina is citric.", "logic": "\nSerologic(albina)\nMore(katrine)\nCitric(katrine)\nAmatory(elli)\nMore(elli)\nnot Amatory(chloe)\nMore(chloe)\nforall x (Aweless(x) -> Catamenial(x))\nforall x (Citric(x) -> Serologic(x))\nforall x (Serologic(x) -> Aweless(x))\nforall x (Citric(x) and Aweless(x) -> not Proximate(x))\nCitric(elli) and not Catamenial(elli) -> not More(elli)\nforall x (Serologic(x) and not Proximate(x) -> Amatory(x))\n\nCitric(albina)\n\nCitric(albina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Almeda is unerasable. Bree is bootleg. Bree is lucifugous. Schuyler is carotid. Schuyler is bootleg. Broddy is not carotid. Broddy is bootleg. If something is ungeared then it is martial. All lucifugous things are unerasable. White things are ungeared. All lucifugous, ungeared things are not organised. If Schuyler is lucifugous and Schuyler is not martial then Schuyler is not bootleg. If something is unerasable and not organised then it is carotid. Broddy is not organised.", "logic": "\nUnerasable(almeda)\nBootleg(bree)\nLucifugous(bree)\nCarotid(schuyler)\nBootleg(schuyler)\nnot Carotid(broddy)\nBootleg(broddy)\nforall x (Ungeared(x) -> Martial(x))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) -> Unerasable(x))\nforall x (Unerasable(x) -> Ungeared(x))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) and Ungeared(x) -> not Organised(x))\nLucifugous(schuyler) and not Martial(schuyler) -> not Bootleg(schuyler)\nforall x (Unerasable(x) and not Organised(x) -> Carotid(x))\n\nnot Organised(broddy)\n\nnot Organised(broddy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Adrian is somnolent. Alena is dread. Alena is blemished. Ragnar is versatile. Ragnar is dread. Flor is not versatile. Flor is dread. If something is flattering then it is homophobic. All blemished things are somnolent. White things are flattering. All blemished, flattering things are not sometime. If Ragnar is blemished and Ragnar is not homophobic then Ragnar is not dread. If something is somnolent and not sometime then it is versatile. Adrian is dread.", "logic": "\nSomnolent(adrian)\nDread(alena)\nBlemished(alena)\nVersatile(ragnar)\nDread(ragnar)\nnot Versatile(flor)\nDread(flor)\nforall x (Flattering(x) -> Homophobic(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) -> Somnolent(x))\nforall x (Somnolent(x) -> Flattering(x))\nforall x (Blemished(x) and Flattering(x) -> not Sometime(x))\nBlemished(ragnar) and not Homophobic(ragnar) -> not Dread(ragnar)\nforall x (Somnolent(x) and not Sometime(x) -> Versatile(x))\n\nDread(adrian)\n\nDread(adrian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Jazmin is not monied. Jazmin is final. Jazmin is actionable. If Jazmin is actionable and Jazmin is not monied then Jazmin is itchy. If someone is itchy and not monied then they are fatty. All fatty, final people are riming. If someone is upsetting and actionable then they are final. If Jazmin is itchy then Jazmin is fatty. Red people are not actionable. Jazmin is actionable.", "logic": "\nnot Monied(jazmin)\nFinal(jazmin)\nActionable(jazmin)\nActionable(jazmin) and not Monied(jazmin) -> Itchy(jazmin)\nforall x (Itchy(x) and not Monied(x) -> Fatty(x))\nforall x (Fatty(x) and Final(x) -> Riming(x))\nforall x (Upsetting(x) and Actionable(x) -> Final(x))\nItchy(jazmin) -> Fatty(jazmin)\nforall x (Monied(x) -> not Actionable(x))\n\nActionable(jazmin)\n\ntherefore Actionable(jazmin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Peggie is not hypnotic. Peggie is plumy. Peggie is thermionic. If Peggie is thermionic and Peggie is not hypnotic then Peggie is divisive. If someone is divisive and not hypnotic then they are diluvian. All diluvian, plumy people are binocular. If someone is merciless and thermionic then they are plumy. If Peggie is divisive then Peggie is diluvian. Red people are not thermionic. Peggie is not thermionic.", "logic": "\nnot Hypnotic(peggie)\nPlumy(peggie)\nThermionic(peggie)\nThermionic(peggie) and not Hypnotic(peggie) -> Divisive(peggie)\nforall x (Divisive(x) and not Hypnotic(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Diluvian(x) and Plumy(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Merciless(x) and Thermionic(x) -> Plumy(x))\nDivisive(peggie) -> Diluvian(peggie)\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) -> not Thermionic(x))\n\nnot Thermionic(peggie)\n\ntherefore Thermionic(peggie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Una is not shocked. Una is uncoiled. Una is allegoric. If Una is allegoric and Una is not shocked then Una is azimuthal. If someone is azimuthal and not shocked then they are expectable. All expectable, uncoiled people are anticlinal. If someone is sequent and allegoric then they are uncoiled. If Una is azimuthal then Una is expectable. Red people are not allegoric. Una is azimuthal.", "logic": "\nnot Shocked(una)\nUncoiled(una)\nAllegoric(una)\nAllegoric(una) and not Shocked(una) -> Azimuthal(una)\nforall x (Azimuthal(x) and not Shocked(x) -> Expectable(x))\nforall x (Expectable(x) and Uncoiled(x) -> Anticlinal(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Allegoric(x) -> Uncoiled(x))\nAzimuthal(una) -> Expectable(una)\nforall x (Shocked(x) -> not Allegoric(x))\n\nAzimuthal(una)\n\nAllegoric(una) and not Shocked(una) and Allegoric(una) and not Shocked(una) -> Azimuthal(una) -> therefore Azimuthal(una)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Tedrick is not orphic. Tedrick is antisocial. Tedrick is senior. If Tedrick is senior and Tedrick is not orphic then Tedrick is damask. If someone is damask and not orphic then they are requested. All requested, antisocial people are septrional. If someone is unreached and senior then they are antisocial. If Tedrick is damask then Tedrick is requested. Red people are not senior. Tedrick is not damask.", "logic": "\nnot Orphic(tedrick)\nAntisocial(tedrick)\nSenior(tedrick)\nSenior(tedrick) and not Orphic(tedrick) -> Damask(tedrick)\nforall x (Damask(x) and not Orphic(x) -> Requested(x))\nforall x (Requested(x) and Antisocial(x) -> Septrional(x))\nforall x (Unreached(x) and Senior(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nDamask(tedrick) -> Requested(tedrick)\nforall x (Orphic(x) -> not Senior(x))\n\nnot Damask(tedrick)\n\nSenior(tedrick) and not Orphic(tedrick) and Senior(tedrick) and not Orphic(tedrick) -> Damask(tedrick) -> therefore Damask(tedrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Rufe is not urinary. Rufe is anorectic. Rufe is snarled. If Rufe is snarled and Rufe is not urinary then Rufe is luxuriant. If someone is luxuriant and not urinary then they are trashy. All trashy, anorectic people are vexatious. If someone is spiritous and snarled then they are anorectic. If Rufe is luxuriant then Rufe is trashy. Red people are not snarled. Rufe is trashy.", "logic": "\nnot Urinary(rufe)\nAnorectic(rufe)\nSnarled(rufe)\nSnarled(rufe) and not Urinary(rufe) -> Luxuriant(rufe)\nforall x (Luxuriant(x) and not Urinary(x) -> Trashy(x))\nforall x (Trashy(x) and Anorectic(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Spiritous(x) and Snarled(x) -> Anorectic(x))\nLuxuriant(rufe) -> Trashy(rufe)\nforall x (Urinary(x) -> not Snarled(x))\n\nTrashy(rufe)\n\nSnarled(rufe) and not Urinary(rufe) and Snarled(rufe) and not Urinary(rufe) -> Luxuriant(rufe) -> therefore Luxuriant(rufe) Luxuriant(rufe) and Luxuriant(rufe) -> Trashy(rufe) -> therefore Trashy(rufe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Jorry is not bleached. Jorry is jewelled. Jorry is goodly. If Jorry is goodly and Jorry is not bleached then Jorry is horary. If someone is horary and not bleached then they are bookable. All bookable, jewelled people are ordinary. If someone is copious and goodly then they are jewelled. If Jorry is horary then Jorry is bookable. Red people are not goodly. Jorry is not bookable.", "logic": "\nnot Bleached(jorry)\nJewelled(jorry)\nGoodly(jorry)\nGoodly(jorry) and not Bleached(jorry) -> Horary(jorry)\nforall x (Horary(x) and not Bleached(x) -> Bookable(x))\nforall x (Bookable(x) and Jewelled(x) -> Ordinary(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) and Goodly(x) -> Jewelled(x))\nHorary(jorry) -> Bookable(jorry)\nforall x (Bleached(x) -> not Goodly(x))\n\nnot Bookable(jorry)\n\nGoodly(jorry) and not Bleached(jorry) and Goodly(jorry) and not Bleached(jorry) -> Horary(jorry) -> therefore Horary(jorry) Horary(jorry) and Horary(jorry) -> Bookable(jorry) -> therefore Bookable(jorry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Britaney is not unfeminine. Britaney is splintery. Britaney is opulent. If Britaney is opulent and Britaney is not unfeminine then Britaney is razorback. If someone is razorback and not unfeminine then they are bookish. All bookish, splintery people are larboard. If someone is clxv and opulent then they are splintery. If Britaney is razorback then Britaney is bookish. Red people are not opulent. Britaney is larboard.", "logic": "\nnot Unfeminine(britaney)\nSplintery(britaney)\nOpulent(britaney)\nOpulent(britaney) and not Unfeminine(britaney) -> Razorback(britaney)\nforall x (Razorback(x) and not Unfeminine(x) -> Bookish(x))\nforall x (Bookish(x) and Splintery(x) -> Larboard(x))\nforall x (Clxv(x) and Opulent(x) -> Splintery(x))\nRazorback(britaney) -> Bookish(britaney)\nforall x (Unfeminine(x) -> not Opulent(x))\n\nLarboard(britaney)\n\nOpulent(britaney) and not Unfeminine(britaney) and Opulent(britaney) and not Unfeminine(britaney) -> Razorback(britaney) -> therefore Razorback(britaney) Razorback(britaney) and Razorback(britaney) -> Bookish(britaney) -> therefore Bookish(britaney) Bookish(britaney) and Splintery(britaney) and forall x (Bookish(x) and Splintery(x) -> Larboard(x)) -> therefore Larboard(britaney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "Eartha is not loquacious. Eartha is jiggered. Eartha is southwest. If Eartha is southwest and Eartha is not loquacious then Eartha is sixteen. If someone is sixteen and not loquacious then they are stellate. All stellate, jiggered people are banded. If someone is splendid and southwest then they are jiggered. If Eartha is sixteen then Eartha is stellate. Red people are not southwest. Eartha is not banded.", "logic": "\nnot Loquacious(eartha)\nJiggered(eartha)\nSouthwest(eartha)\nSouthwest(eartha) and not Loquacious(eartha) -> Sixteen(eartha)\nforall x (Sixteen(x) and not Loquacious(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) and Jiggered(x) -> Banded(x))\nforall x (Splendid(x) and Southwest(x) -> Jiggered(x))\nSixteen(eartha) -> Stellate(eartha)\nforall x (Loquacious(x) -> not Southwest(x))\n\nnot Banded(eartha)\n\nSouthwest(eartha) and not Loquacious(eartha) and Southwest(eartha) and not Loquacious(eartha) -> Sixteen(eartha) -> therefore Sixteen(eartha) Sixteen(eartha) and Sixteen(eartha) -> Stellate(eartha) -> therefore Stellate(eartha) Stellate(eartha) and Jiggered(eartha) and forall x (Stellate(x) and Jiggered(x) -> Banded(x)) -> therefore Banded(eartha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-433"} {"premises": "The anni does not chase the lauryn. The anni does not eat the sholom. The damon reawaken the lauryn. The damon is legitimate. The sholom reawaken the anni. The sholom is legitimate. The lauryn exit the anni. The lauryn reawaken the anni. The lauryn is ignorant. The lauryn branch the damon. If the damon branch the anni and the damon does not chase the anni then the anni exit the lauryn. Kind people are ignorant. If someone is nineteen then they do not chase the lauryn. If the anni branch the sholom then the sholom does not chase the anni. If someone exit the lauryn and the lauryn is nineteen then the lauryn is ignorant. If someone branch the lauryn and the lauryn exit the sholom then the lauryn reawaken the damon. The damon is legitimate.", "logic": "\nnot Exit(anni, lauryn)\nnot Reawaken(anni, sholom)\nReawaken(damon, lauryn)\nLegitimate(damon)\nReawaken(sholom, anni)\nLegitimate(sholom)\nExit(lauryn, anni)\nReawaken(lauryn, anni)\nIgnorant(lauryn)\nBranch(lauryn, damon)\nBranch(damon, anni) and not Exit(damon, anni) -> Exit(anni, lauryn)\nforall x (Nineteen(x) -> Ignorant(x))\nforall x (Nineteen(x) -> not Exit(x, lauryn))\nBranch(anni, sholom) -> not Exit(sholom, anni)\nforall x (Exit(x, lauryn) and Nineteen(lauryn) -> Ignorant(lauryn))\nforall x (Branch(x, lauryn) and Exit(lauryn, sholom) -> Reawaken(lauryn, damon))\n\nLegitimate(damon)\n\ntherefore Legitimate(damon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2755"} {"premises": "The moore does not chase the dulcie. The moore does not eat the damian. The ricca adventure the dulcie. The ricca is nonaged. The damian adventure the moore. The damian is nonaged. The dulcie ligate the moore. The dulcie adventure the moore. The dulcie is subsidised. The dulcie pipe the ricca. If the ricca pipe the moore and the ricca does not chase the moore then the moore ligate the dulcie. Kind people are subsidised. If someone is reversed then they do not chase the dulcie. If the moore pipe the damian then the damian does not chase the moore. If someone ligate the dulcie and the dulcie is reversed then the dulcie is subsidised. If someone pipe the dulcie and the dulcie ligate the damian then the dulcie adventure the ricca. The ricca is not nonaged.", "logic": "\nnot Ligate(moore, dulcie)\nnot Adventure(moore, damian)\nAdventure(ricca, dulcie)\nNonaged(ricca)\nAdventure(damian, moore)\nNonaged(damian)\nLigate(dulcie, moore)\nAdventure(dulcie, moore)\nSubsidised(dulcie)\nPipe(dulcie, ricca)\nPipe(ricca, moore) and not Ligate(ricca, moore) -> Ligate(moore, dulcie)\nforall x (Reversed(x) -> Subsidised(x))\nforall x (Reversed(x) -> not Ligate(x, dulcie))\nPipe(moore, damian) -> not Ligate(damian, moore)\nforall x (Ligate(x, dulcie) and Reversed(dulcie) -> Subsidised(dulcie))\nforall x (Pipe(x, dulcie) and Ligate(dulcie, damian) -> Adventure(dulcie, ricca))\n\nnot Nonaged(ricca)\n\ntherefore Nonaged(ricca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2755"} {"premises": "The bellanca does not chase the alysia. The bellanca does not eat the ileana. The katuscha energize the alysia. The katuscha is unstaged. The ileana energize the bellanca. The ileana is unstaged. The alysia untwine the bellanca. The alysia energize the bellanca. The alysia is contained. The alysia badmouth the katuscha. If the katuscha badmouth the bellanca and the katuscha does not chase the bellanca then the bellanca untwine the alysia. Kind people are contained. If someone is obstinate then they do not chase the alysia. If the bellanca badmouth the ileana then the ileana does not chase the bellanca. If someone untwine the alysia and the alysia is obstinate then the alysia is contained. If someone badmouth the alysia and the alysia untwine the ileana then the alysia energize the katuscha. The katuscha is not contained.", "logic": "\nnot Untwine(bellanca, alysia)\nnot Energize(bellanca, ileana)\nEnergize(katuscha, alysia)\nUnstaged(katuscha)\nEnergize(ileana, bellanca)\nUnstaged(ileana)\nUntwine(alysia, bellanca)\nEnergize(alysia, bellanca)\nContained(alysia)\nBadmouth(alysia, katuscha)\nBadmouth(katuscha, bellanca) and not Untwine(katuscha, bellanca) -> Untwine(bellanca, alysia)\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> Contained(x))\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> not Untwine(x, alysia))\nBadmouth(bellanca, ileana) -> not Untwine(ileana, bellanca)\nforall x (Untwine(x, alysia) and Obstinate(alysia) -> Contained(alysia))\nforall x (Badmouth(x, alysia) and Untwine(alysia, ileana) -> Energize(alysia, katuscha))\n\nnot Contained(katuscha)\n\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> Contained(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2755"} {"premises": "The vincent does not chase the horatio. The vincent does not eat the mabelle. The orton birth the horatio. The orton is infinite. The mabelle birth the vincent. The mabelle is infinite. The horatio hope the vincent. The horatio birth the vincent. The horatio is avocado. The horatio stray the orton. If the orton stray the vincent and the orton does not chase the vincent then the vincent hope the horatio. Kind people are avocado. If someone is clonic then they do not chase the horatio. If the vincent stray the mabelle then the mabelle does not chase the vincent. If someone hope the horatio and the horatio is clonic then the horatio is avocado. If someone stray the horatio and the horatio hope the mabelle then the horatio birth the orton. The vincent is infinite.", "logic": "\nnot Hope(vincent, horatio)\nnot Birth(vincent, mabelle)\nBirth(orton, horatio)\nInfinite(orton)\nBirth(mabelle, vincent)\nInfinite(mabelle)\nHope(horatio, vincent)\nBirth(horatio, vincent)\nAvocado(horatio)\nStray(horatio, orton)\nStray(orton, vincent) and not Hope(orton, vincent) -> Hope(vincent, horatio)\nforall x (Clonic(x) -> Avocado(x))\nforall x (Clonic(x) -> not Hope(x, horatio))\nStray(vincent, mabelle) -> not Hope(mabelle, vincent)\nforall x (Hope(x, horatio) and Clonic(horatio) -> Avocado(horatio))\nforall x (Stray(x, horatio) and Hope(horatio, mabelle) -> Birth(horatio, orton))\n\nInfinite(vincent)\n\nInfinite(vincent) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2755"} {"premises": "The jermain inspissate the ervin. The jermain beep the bernete. The jermain does not eat the ervin. The jermain is not catalytic. The jermain does not visit the bernete. The bernete beep the ervin. The ervin inspissate the jermain. The ervin beep the jermain. The ervin beep the bernete. The ervin is not irrational. If someone inspissate the ervin then the ervin is apophatic. If someone beep the bernete and the bernete does not eat the jermain then the jermain is not irrational. If someone is apophatic and they do not chase the bernete then the bernete inspissate the jermain. If the ervin inspissate the jermain and the ervin confide the jermain then the jermain beep the ervin. If someone confide the bernete and they are apophatic then the bernete does not eat the ervin. If someone is apophatic then they are flameproof. If someone is flameproof and not apophatic then they visit the ervin. If someone is flameproof and not irrational then they visit the ervin. The ervin is not irrational.", "logic": "\nInspissate(jermain, ervin)\nBeep(jermain, bernete)\nnot Beep(jermain, ervin)\nnot Catalytic(jermain)\nnot Confide(jermain, bernete)\nBeep(bernete, ervin)\nInspissate(ervin, jermain)\nBeep(ervin, jermain)\nBeep(ervin, bernete)\nnot Irrational(ervin)\nforall x (Inspissate(x, ervin) -> Apophatic(ervin))\nforall x (Beep(x, bernete) and not Beep(bernete, jermain) -> not Irrational(jermain))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) and not Inspissate(x, bernete) -> Inspissate(bernete, jermain))\nInspissate(ervin, jermain) and Confide(ervin, jermain) -> Beep(jermain, ervin)\nforall x (Confide(x, bernete) and Apophatic(x) -> not Beep(bernete, ervin))\nforall x (Apophatic(x) -> Flameproof(x))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and not Apophatic(x) -> Confide(x, ervin))\nforall x (Flameproof(x) and not Irrational(x) -> Confide(x, ervin))\n\nnot Irrational(ervin)\n\ntherefore not Irrational(ervin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The lizbeth slack the nicolle. The lizbeth uncloak the joey. The lizbeth does not eat the nicolle. The lizbeth is not nonunion. The lizbeth does not visit the joey. The joey uncloak the nicolle. The nicolle slack the lizbeth. The nicolle uncloak the lizbeth. The nicolle uncloak the joey. The nicolle is not colicky. If someone slack the nicolle then the nicolle is inverse. If someone uncloak the joey and the joey does not eat the lizbeth then the lizbeth is not colicky. If someone is inverse and they do not chase the joey then the joey slack the lizbeth. If the nicolle slack the lizbeth and the nicolle peril the lizbeth then the lizbeth uncloak the nicolle. If someone peril the joey and they are inverse then the joey does not eat the nicolle. If someone is inverse then they are avertible. If someone is avertible and not inverse then they visit the nicolle. If someone is avertible and not colicky then they visit the nicolle. The nicolle does not chase the lizbeth.", "logic": "\nSlack(lizbeth, nicolle)\nUncloak(lizbeth, joey)\nnot Uncloak(lizbeth, nicolle)\nnot Nonunion(lizbeth)\nnot Peril(lizbeth, joey)\nUncloak(joey, nicolle)\nSlack(nicolle, lizbeth)\nUncloak(nicolle, lizbeth)\nUncloak(nicolle, joey)\nnot Colicky(nicolle)\nforall x (Slack(x, nicolle) -> Inverse(nicolle))\nforall x (Uncloak(x, joey) and not Uncloak(joey, lizbeth) -> not Colicky(lizbeth))\nforall x (Inverse(x) and not Slack(x, joey) -> Slack(joey, lizbeth))\nSlack(nicolle, lizbeth) and Peril(nicolle, lizbeth) -> Uncloak(lizbeth, nicolle)\nforall x (Peril(x, joey) and Inverse(x) -> not Uncloak(joey, nicolle))\nforall x (Inverse(x) -> Avertible(x))\nforall x (Avertible(x) and not Inverse(x) -> Peril(x, nicolle))\nforall x (Avertible(x) and not Colicky(x) -> Peril(x, nicolle))\n\nnot Slack(nicolle, lizbeth)\n\ntherefore Slack(nicolle, lizbeth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The anthea click the reube. The anthea enact the fortune. The anthea does not eat the reube. The anthea is not bauxitic. The anthea does not visit the fortune. The fortune enact the reube. The reube click the anthea. The reube enact the anthea. The reube enact the fortune. The reube is not atheistic. If someone click the reube then the reube is fanlike. If someone enact the fortune and the fortune does not eat the anthea then the anthea is not atheistic. If someone is fanlike and they do not chase the fortune then the fortune click the anthea. If the reube click the anthea and the reube ptyalise the anthea then the anthea enact the reube. If someone ptyalise the fortune and they are fanlike then the fortune does not eat the reube. If someone is fanlike then they are furthest. If someone is furthest and not fanlike then they visit the reube. If someone is furthest and not atheistic then they visit the reube. The reube is fanlike.", "logic": "\nClick(anthea, reube)\nEnact(anthea, fortune)\nnot Enact(anthea, reube)\nnot Bauxitic(anthea)\nnot Ptyalise(anthea, fortune)\nEnact(fortune, reube)\nClick(reube, anthea)\nEnact(reube, anthea)\nEnact(reube, fortune)\nnot Atheistic(reube)\nforall x (Click(x, reube) -> Fanlike(reube))\nforall x (Enact(x, fortune) and not Enact(fortune, anthea) -> not Atheistic(anthea))\nforall x (Fanlike(x) and not Click(x, fortune) -> Click(fortune, anthea))\nClick(reube, anthea) and Ptyalise(reube, anthea) -> Enact(anthea, reube)\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, fortune) and Fanlike(x) -> not Enact(fortune, reube))\nforall x (Fanlike(x) -> Furthest(x))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and not Fanlike(x) -> Ptyalise(x, reube))\nforall x (Furthest(x) and not Atheistic(x) -> Ptyalise(x, reube))\n\nFanlike(reube)\n\nClick(anthea, reube) and forall x (Click(x, reube) -> Fanlike(reube)) -> therefore Fanlike(reube)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The rosina caparison the cari. The rosina abet the sallie. The rosina does not eat the cari. The rosina is not tasselled. The rosina does not visit the sallie. The sallie abet the cari. The cari caparison the rosina. The cari abet the rosina. The cari abet the sallie. The cari is not wanted. If someone caparison the cari then the cari is corporeal. If someone abet the sallie and the sallie does not eat the rosina then the rosina is not wanted. If someone is corporeal and they do not chase the sallie then the sallie caparison the rosina. If the cari caparison the rosina and the cari realize the rosina then the rosina abet the cari. If someone realize the sallie and they are corporeal then the sallie does not eat the cari. If someone is corporeal then they are impish. If someone is impish and not corporeal then they visit the cari. If someone is impish and not wanted then they visit the cari. The cari is not corporeal.", "logic": "\nCaparison(rosina, cari)\nAbet(rosina, sallie)\nnot Abet(rosina, cari)\nnot Tasselled(rosina)\nnot Realize(rosina, sallie)\nAbet(sallie, cari)\nCaparison(cari, rosina)\nAbet(cari, rosina)\nAbet(cari, sallie)\nnot Wanted(cari)\nforall x (Caparison(x, cari) -> Corporeal(cari))\nforall x (Abet(x, sallie) and not Abet(sallie, rosina) -> not Wanted(rosina))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) and not Caparison(x, sallie) -> Caparison(sallie, rosina))\nCaparison(cari, rosina) and Realize(cari, rosina) -> Abet(rosina, cari)\nforall x (Realize(x, sallie) and Corporeal(x) -> not Abet(sallie, cari))\nforall x (Corporeal(x) -> Impish(x))\nforall x (Impish(x) and not Corporeal(x) -> Realize(x, cari))\nforall x (Impish(x) and not Wanted(x) -> Realize(x, cari))\n\nnot Corporeal(cari)\n\nCaparison(rosina, cari) and forall x (Caparison(x, cari) -> Corporeal(cari)) -> therefore Corporeal(cari)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The raychel smell the ophelie. The raychel unionise the britte. The raychel does not eat the ophelie. The raychel is not congestive. The raychel does not visit the britte. The britte unionise the ophelie. The ophelie smell the raychel. The ophelie unionise the raychel. The ophelie unionise the britte. The ophelie is not cystic. If someone smell the ophelie then the ophelie is epidermal. If someone unionise the britte and the britte does not eat the raychel then the raychel is not cystic. If someone is epidermal and they do not chase the britte then the britte smell the raychel. If the ophelie smell the raychel and the ophelie disable the raychel then the raychel unionise the ophelie. If someone disable the britte and they are epidermal then the britte does not eat the ophelie. If someone is epidermal then they are motherlike. If someone is motherlike and not epidermal then they visit the ophelie. If someone is motherlike and not cystic then they visit the ophelie. The ophelie is motherlike.", "logic": "\nSmell(raychel, ophelie)\nUnionise(raychel, britte)\nnot Unionise(raychel, ophelie)\nnot Congestive(raychel)\nnot Disable(raychel, britte)\nUnionise(britte, ophelie)\nSmell(ophelie, raychel)\nUnionise(ophelie, raychel)\nUnionise(ophelie, britte)\nnot Cystic(ophelie)\nforall x (Smell(x, ophelie) -> Epidermal(ophelie))\nforall x (Unionise(x, britte) and not Unionise(britte, raychel) -> not Cystic(raychel))\nforall x (Epidermal(x) and not Smell(x, britte) -> Smell(britte, raychel))\nSmell(ophelie, raychel) and Disable(ophelie, raychel) -> Unionise(raychel, ophelie)\nforall x (Disable(x, britte) and Epidermal(x) -> not Unionise(britte, ophelie))\nforall x (Epidermal(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and not Epidermal(x) -> Disable(x, ophelie))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and not Cystic(x) -> Disable(x, ophelie))\n\nMotherlike(ophelie)\n\nSmell(raychel, ophelie) and forall x (Smell(x, ophelie) -> Epidermal(ophelie)) -> therefore Epidermal(ophelie) Epidermal(ophelie) and forall x (Epidermal(x) -> Motherlike(x)) -> therefore Motherlike(ophelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The hervey contend the cristabel. The hervey blat the danika. The hervey does not eat the cristabel. The hervey is not gainful. The hervey does not visit the danika. The danika blat the cristabel. The cristabel contend the hervey. The cristabel blat the hervey. The cristabel blat the danika. The cristabel is not unrentable. If someone contend the cristabel then the cristabel is pinnate. If someone blat the danika and the danika does not eat the hervey then the hervey is not unrentable. If someone is pinnate and they do not chase the danika then the danika contend the hervey. If the cristabel contend the hervey and the cristabel parry the hervey then the hervey blat the cristabel. If someone parry the danika and they are pinnate then the danika does not eat the cristabel. If someone is pinnate then they are oddish. If someone is oddish and not pinnate then they visit the cristabel. If someone is oddish and not unrentable then they visit the cristabel. The cristabel is not oddish.", "logic": "\nContend(hervey, cristabel)\nBlat(hervey, danika)\nnot Blat(hervey, cristabel)\nnot Gainful(hervey)\nnot Parry(hervey, danika)\nBlat(danika, cristabel)\nContend(cristabel, hervey)\nBlat(cristabel, hervey)\nBlat(cristabel, danika)\nnot Unrentable(cristabel)\nforall x (Contend(x, cristabel) -> Pinnate(cristabel))\nforall x (Blat(x, danika) and not Blat(danika, hervey) -> not Unrentable(hervey))\nforall x (Pinnate(x) and not Contend(x, danika) -> Contend(danika, hervey))\nContend(cristabel, hervey) and Parry(cristabel, hervey) -> Blat(hervey, cristabel)\nforall x (Parry(x, danika) and Pinnate(x) -> not Blat(danika, cristabel))\nforall x (Pinnate(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) and not Pinnate(x) -> Parry(x, cristabel))\nforall x (Oddish(x) and not Unrentable(x) -> Parry(x, cristabel))\n\nnot Oddish(cristabel)\n\nContend(hervey, cristabel) and forall x (Contend(x, cristabel) -> Pinnate(cristabel)) -> therefore Pinnate(cristabel) Pinnate(cristabel) and forall x (Pinnate(x) -> Oddish(x)) -> therefore Oddish(cristabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The roby kidnap the morissa. The roby outfit the cobbie. The roby does not eat the morissa. The roby is not oldish. The roby does not visit the cobbie. The cobbie outfit the morissa. The morissa kidnap the roby. The morissa outfit the roby. The morissa outfit the cobbie. The morissa is not unmodified. If someone kidnap the morissa then the morissa is buggy. If someone outfit the cobbie and the cobbie does not eat the roby then the roby is not unmodified. If someone is buggy and they do not chase the cobbie then the cobbie kidnap the roby. If the morissa kidnap the roby and the morissa blacklead the roby then the roby outfit the morissa. If someone blacklead the cobbie and they are buggy then the cobbie does not eat the morissa. If someone is buggy then they are hemolytic. If someone is hemolytic and not buggy then they visit the morissa. If someone is hemolytic and not unmodified then they visit the morissa. The morissa blacklead the morissa.", "logic": "\nKidnap(roby, morissa)\nOutfit(roby, cobbie)\nnot Outfit(roby, morissa)\nnot Oldish(roby)\nnot Blacklead(roby, cobbie)\nOutfit(cobbie, morissa)\nKidnap(morissa, roby)\nOutfit(morissa, roby)\nOutfit(morissa, cobbie)\nnot Unmodified(morissa)\nforall x (Kidnap(x, morissa) -> Buggy(morissa))\nforall x (Outfit(x, cobbie) and not Outfit(cobbie, roby) -> not Unmodified(roby))\nforall x (Buggy(x) and not Kidnap(x, cobbie) -> Kidnap(cobbie, roby))\nKidnap(morissa, roby) and Blacklead(morissa, roby) -> Outfit(roby, morissa)\nforall x (Blacklead(x, cobbie) and Buggy(x) -> not Outfit(cobbie, morissa))\nforall x (Buggy(x) -> Hemolytic(x))\nforall x (Hemolytic(x) and not Buggy(x) -> Blacklead(x, morissa))\nforall x (Hemolytic(x) and not Unmodified(x) -> Blacklead(x, morissa))\n\nBlacklead(morissa, morissa)\n\nKidnap(roby, morissa) and forall x (Kidnap(x, morissa) -> Buggy(morissa)) -> therefore Buggy(morissa) Buggy(morissa) and forall x (Buggy(x) -> Hemolytic(x)) -> therefore Hemolytic(morissa) Hemolytic(morissa) and not Unmodified(morissa) and forall x (Hemolytic(x) and not Unmodified(x) -> Blacklead(x, morissa)) -> therefore Blacklead(morissa, morissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The samson flinch the stillman. The samson medicine the lilia. The samson does not eat the stillman. The samson is not salving. The samson does not visit the lilia. The lilia medicine the stillman. The stillman flinch the samson. The stillman medicine the samson. The stillman medicine the lilia. The stillman is not puzzled. If someone flinch the stillman then the stillman is sewed. If someone medicine the lilia and the lilia does not eat the samson then the samson is not puzzled. If someone is sewed and they do not chase the lilia then the lilia flinch the samson. If the stillman flinch the samson and the stillman chain the samson then the samson medicine the stillman. If someone chain the lilia and they are sewed then the lilia does not eat the stillman. If someone is sewed then they are indurate. If someone is indurate and not sewed then they visit the stillman. If someone is indurate and not puzzled then they visit the stillman. The stillman does not visit the stillman.", "logic": "\nFlinch(samson, stillman)\nMedicine(samson, lilia)\nnot Medicine(samson, stillman)\nnot Salving(samson)\nnot Chain(samson, lilia)\nMedicine(lilia, stillman)\nFlinch(stillman, samson)\nMedicine(stillman, samson)\nMedicine(stillman, lilia)\nnot Puzzled(stillman)\nforall x (Flinch(x, stillman) -> Sewed(stillman))\nforall x (Medicine(x, lilia) and not Medicine(lilia, samson) -> not Puzzled(samson))\nforall x (Sewed(x) and not Flinch(x, lilia) -> Flinch(lilia, samson))\nFlinch(stillman, samson) and Chain(stillman, samson) -> Medicine(samson, stillman)\nforall x (Chain(x, lilia) and Sewed(x) -> not Medicine(lilia, stillman))\nforall x (Sewed(x) -> Indurate(x))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and not Sewed(x) -> Chain(x, stillman))\nforall x (Indurate(x) and not Puzzled(x) -> Chain(x, stillman))\n\nnot Chain(stillman, stillman)\n\nFlinch(samson, stillman) and forall x (Flinch(x, stillman) -> Sewed(stillman)) -> therefore Sewed(stillman) Sewed(stillman) and forall x (Sewed(x) -> Indurate(x)) -> therefore Indurate(stillman) Indurate(stillman) and not Puzzled(stillman) and forall x (Indurate(x) and not Puzzled(x) -> Chain(x, stillman)) -> therefore Chain(stillman, stillman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The hermione wither the albertine. The hermione admire the melitta. The hermione does not eat the albertine. The hermione is not oleophilic. The hermione does not visit the melitta. The melitta admire the albertine. The albertine wither the hermione. The albertine admire the hermione. The albertine admire the melitta. The albertine is not slashing. If someone wither the albertine then the albertine is adscript. If someone admire the melitta and the melitta does not eat the hermione then the hermione is not slashing. If someone is adscript and they do not chase the melitta then the melitta wither the hermione. If the albertine wither the hermione and the albertine palm the hermione then the hermione admire the albertine. If someone palm the melitta and they are adscript then the melitta does not eat the albertine. If someone is adscript then they are planless. If someone is planless and not adscript then they visit the albertine. If someone is planless and not slashing then they visit the albertine. The melitta does not visit the albertine.", "logic": "\nWither(hermione, albertine)\nAdmire(hermione, melitta)\nnot Admire(hermione, albertine)\nnot Oleophilic(hermione)\nnot Palm(hermione, melitta)\nAdmire(melitta, albertine)\nWither(albertine, hermione)\nAdmire(albertine, hermione)\nAdmire(albertine, melitta)\nnot Slashing(albertine)\nforall x (Wither(x, albertine) -> Adscript(albertine))\nforall x (Admire(x, melitta) and not Admire(melitta, hermione) -> not Slashing(hermione))\nforall x (Adscript(x) and not Wither(x, melitta) -> Wither(melitta, hermione))\nWither(albertine, hermione) and Palm(albertine, hermione) -> Admire(hermione, albertine)\nforall x (Palm(x, melitta) and Adscript(x) -> not Admire(melitta, albertine))\nforall x (Adscript(x) -> Planless(x))\nforall x (Planless(x) and not Adscript(x) -> Palm(x, albertine))\nforall x (Planless(x) and not Slashing(x) -> Palm(x, albertine))\n\nnot Palm(melitta, albertine)\n\nforall x (Planless(x) and not Adscript(x) -> Palm(x, albertine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The lulu globalize the giovanni. The lulu trump the ross. The lulu does not eat the giovanni. The lulu is not stinking. The lulu does not visit the ross. The ross trump the giovanni. The giovanni globalize the lulu. The giovanni trump the lulu. The giovanni trump the ross. The giovanni is not postural. If someone globalize the giovanni then the giovanni is faint. If someone trump the ross and the ross does not eat the lulu then the lulu is not postural. If someone is faint and they do not chase the ross then the ross globalize the lulu. If the giovanni globalize the lulu and the giovanni deform the lulu then the lulu trump the giovanni. If someone deform the ross and they are faint then the ross does not eat the giovanni. If someone is faint then they are anaclitic. If someone is anaclitic and not faint then they visit the giovanni. If someone is anaclitic and not postural then they visit the giovanni. The ross globalize the lulu.", "logic": "\nGlobalize(lulu, giovanni)\nTrump(lulu, ross)\nnot Trump(lulu, giovanni)\nnot Stinking(lulu)\nnot Deform(lulu, ross)\nTrump(ross, giovanni)\nGlobalize(giovanni, lulu)\nTrump(giovanni, lulu)\nTrump(giovanni, ross)\nnot Postural(giovanni)\nforall x (Globalize(x, giovanni) -> Faint(giovanni))\nforall x (Trump(x, ross) and not Trump(ross, lulu) -> not Postural(lulu))\nforall x (Faint(x) and not Globalize(x, ross) -> Globalize(ross, lulu))\nGlobalize(giovanni, lulu) and Deform(giovanni, lulu) -> Trump(lulu, giovanni)\nforall x (Deform(x, ross) and Faint(x) -> not Trump(ross, giovanni))\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Anaclitic(x))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and not Faint(x) -> Deform(x, giovanni))\nforall x (Anaclitic(x) and not Postural(x) -> Deform(x, giovanni))\n\nGlobalize(ross, lulu)\n\nforall x (Faint(x) and not Globalize(x, ross) -> Globalize(ross, lulu)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The avram deck the joelle. The avram prophesy the clary. The avram does not eat the joelle. The avram is not niffy. The avram does not visit the clary. The clary prophesy the joelle. The joelle deck the avram. The joelle prophesy the avram. The joelle prophesy the clary. The joelle is not togged. If someone deck the joelle then the joelle is coexisting. If someone prophesy the clary and the clary does not eat the avram then the avram is not togged. If someone is coexisting and they do not chase the clary then the clary deck the avram. If the joelle deck the avram and the joelle strew the avram then the avram prophesy the joelle. If someone strew the clary and they are coexisting then the clary does not eat the joelle. If someone is coexisting then they are typic. If someone is typic and not coexisting then they visit the joelle. If someone is typic and not togged then they visit the joelle. The avram does not visit the joelle.", "logic": "\nDeck(avram, joelle)\nProphesy(avram, clary)\nnot Prophesy(avram, joelle)\nnot Niffy(avram)\nnot Strew(avram, clary)\nProphesy(clary, joelle)\nDeck(joelle, avram)\nProphesy(joelle, avram)\nProphesy(joelle, clary)\nnot Togged(joelle)\nforall x (Deck(x, joelle) -> Coexisting(joelle))\nforall x (Prophesy(x, clary) and not Prophesy(clary, avram) -> not Togged(avram))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) and not Deck(x, clary) -> Deck(clary, avram))\nDeck(joelle, avram) and Strew(joelle, avram) -> Prophesy(avram, joelle)\nforall x (Strew(x, clary) and Coexisting(x) -> not Prophesy(clary, joelle))\nforall x (Coexisting(x) -> Typic(x))\nforall x (Typic(x) and not Coexisting(x) -> Strew(x, joelle))\nforall x (Typic(x) and not Togged(x) -> Strew(x, joelle))\n\nnot Strew(avram, joelle)\n\nforall x (Typic(x) and not Coexisting(x) -> Strew(x, joelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The bettina subsume the keely. The bettina branch the adela. The bettina does not eat the keely. The bettina is not adscript. The bettina does not visit the adela. The adela branch the keely. The keely subsume the bettina. The keely branch the bettina. The keely branch the adela. The keely is not built. If someone subsume the keely then the keely is dedicated. If someone branch the adela and the adela does not eat the bettina then the bettina is not built. If someone is dedicated and they do not chase the adela then the adela subsume the bettina. If the keely subsume the bettina and the keely muddle the bettina then the bettina branch the keely. If someone muddle the adela and they are dedicated then the adela does not eat the keely. If someone is dedicated then they are oxidised. If someone is oxidised and not dedicated then they visit the keely. If someone is oxidised and not built then they visit the keely. The bettina is oxidised.", "logic": "\nSubsume(bettina, keely)\nBranch(bettina, adela)\nnot Branch(bettina, keely)\nnot Adscript(bettina)\nnot Muddle(bettina, adela)\nBranch(adela, keely)\nSubsume(keely, bettina)\nBranch(keely, bettina)\nBranch(keely, adela)\nnot Built(keely)\nforall x (Subsume(x, keely) -> Dedicated(keely))\nforall x (Branch(x, adela) and not Branch(adela, bettina) -> not Built(bettina))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) and not Subsume(x, adela) -> Subsume(adela, bettina))\nSubsume(keely, bettina) and Muddle(keely, bettina) -> Branch(bettina, keely)\nforall x (Muddle(x, adela) and Dedicated(x) -> not Branch(adela, keely))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) -> Oxidised(x))\nforall x (Oxidised(x) and not Dedicated(x) -> Muddle(x, keely))\nforall x (Oxidised(x) and not Built(x) -> Muddle(x, keely))\n\nOxidised(bettina)\n\nforall x (Dedicated(x) -> Oxidised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The gerold capsulize the rosette. The gerold hymn the eli. The gerold does not eat the rosette. The gerold is not ostensible. The gerold does not visit the eli. The eli hymn the rosette. The rosette capsulize the gerold. The rosette hymn the gerold. The rosette hymn the eli. The rosette is not polychrome. If someone capsulize the rosette then the rosette is chromatic. If someone hymn the eli and the eli does not eat the gerold then the gerold is not polychrome. If someone is chromatic and they do not chase the eli then the eli capsulize the gerold. If the rosette capsulize the gerold and the rosette unman the gerold then the gerold hymn the rosette. If someone unman the eli and they are chromatic then the eli does not eat the rosette. If someone is chromatic then they are verbatim. If someone is verbatim and not chromatic then they visit the rosette. If someone is verbatim and not polychrome then they visit the rosette. The eli is not ostensible.", "logic": "\nCapsulize(gerold, rosette)\nHymn(gerold, eli)\nnot Hymn(gerold, rosette)\nnot Ostensible(gerold)\nnot Unman(gerold, eli)\nHymn(eli, rosette)\nCapsulize(rosette, gerold)\nHymn(rosette, gerold)\nHymn(rosette, eli)\nnot Polychrome(rosette)\nforall x (Capsulize(x, rosette) -> Chromatic(rosette))\nforall x (Hymn(x, eli) and not Hymn(eli, gerold) -> not Polychrome(gerold))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) and not Capsulize(x, eli) -> Capsulize(eli, gerold))\nCapsulize(rosette, gerold) and Unman(rosette, gerold) -> Hymn(gerold, rosette)\nforall x (Unman(x, eli) and Chromatic(x) -> not Hymn(eli, rosette))\nforall x (Chromatic(x) -> Verbatim(x))\nforall x (Verbatim(x) and not Chromatic(x) -> Unman(x, rosette))\nforall x (Verbatim(x) and not Polychrome(x) -> Unman(x, rosette))\n\nnot Ostensible(eli)\n\nnot Ostensible(eli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The willis mellow the mart. The willis exhale the gwendolin. The willis does not eat the mart. The willis is not umbilical. The willis does not visit the gwendolin. The gwendolin exhale the mart. The mart mellow the willis. The mart exhale the willis. The mart exhale the gwendolin. The mart is not moderato. If someone mellow the mart then the mart is raining. If someone exhale the gwendolin and the gwendolin does not eat the willis then the willis is not moderato. If someone is raining and they do not chase the gwendolin then the gwendolin mellow the willis. If the mart mellow the willis and the mart pasteurise the willis then the willis exhale the mart. If someone pasteurise the gwendolin and they are raining then the gwendolin does not eat the mart. If someone is raining then they are shamefaced. If someone is shamefaced and not raining then they visit the mart. If someone is shamefaced and not moderato then they visit the mart. The gwendolin is moderato.", "logic": "\nMellow(willis, mart)\nExhale(willis, gwendolin)\nnot Exhale(willis, mart)\nnot Umbilical(willis)\nnot Pasteurise(willis, gwendolin)\nExhale(gwendolin, mart)\nMellow(mart, willis)\nExhale(mart, willis)\nExhale(mart, gwendolin)\nnot Moderato(mart)\nforall x (Mellow(x, mart) -> Raining(mart))\nforall x (Exhale(x, gwendolin) and not Exhale(gwendolin, willis) -> not Moderato(willis))\nforall x (Raining(x) and not Mellow(x, gwendolin) -> Mellow(gwendolin, willis))\nMellow(mart, willis) and Pasteurise(mart, willis) -> Exhale(willis, mart)\nforall x (Pasteurise(x, gwendolin) and Raining(x) -> not Exhale(gwendolin, mart))\nforall x (Raining(x) -> Shamefaced(x))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and not Raining(x) -> Pasteurise(x, mart))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) and not Moderato(x) -> Pasteurise(x, mart))\n\nModerato(gwendolin)\n\nModerato(gwendolin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The jody covet the gisele. The jody elope the charlean. The jody does not eat the gisele. The jody is not inebriated. The jody does not visit the charlean. The charlean elope the gisele. The gisele covet the jody. The gisele elope the jody. The gisele elope the charlean. The gisele is not monacan. If someone covet the gisele then the gisele is blasting. If someone elope the charlean and the charlean does not eat the jody then the jody is not monacan. If someone is blasting and they do not chase the charlean then the charlean covet the jody. If the gisele covet the jody and the gisele corn the jody then the jody elope the gisele. If someone corn the charlean and they are blasting then the charlean does not eat the gisele. If someone is blasting then they are dishy. If someone is dishy and not blasting then they visit the gisele. If someone is dishy and not monacan then they visit the gisele. The gisele does not eat the gisele.", "logic": "\nCovet(jody, gisele)\nElope(jody, charlean)\nnot Elope(jody, gisele)\nnot Inebriated(jody)\nnot Corn(jody, charlean)\nElope(charlean, gisele)\nCovet(gisele, jody)\nElope(gisele, jody)\nElope(gisele, charlean)\nnot Monacan(gisele)\nforall x (Covet(x, gisele) -> Blasting(gisele))\nforall x (Elope(x, charlean) and not Elope(charlean, jody) -> not Monacan(jody))\nforall x (Blasting(x) and not Covet(x, charlean) -> Covet(charlean, jody))\nCovet(gisele, jody) and Corn(gisele, jody) -> Elope(jody, gisele)\nforall x (Corn(x, charlean) and Blasting(x) -> not Elope(charlean, gisele))\nforall x (Blasting(x) -> Dishy(x))\nforall x (Dishy(x) and not Blasting(x) -> Corn(x, gisele))\nforall x (Dishy(x) and not Monacan(x) -> Corn(x, gisele))\n\nnot Elope(gisele, gisele)\n\nnot Elope(gisele, gisele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "The vaclav miaou the cherie. The vaclav roast the latrina. The vaclav does not eat the cherie. The vaclav is not cogitable. The vaclav does not visit the latrina. The latrina roast the cherie. The cherie miaou the vaclav. The cherie roast the vaclav. The cherie roast the latrina. The cherie is not oval. If someone miaou the cherie then the cherie is tsaristic. If someone roast the latrina and the latrina does not eat the vaclav then the vaclav is not oval. If someone is tsaristic and they do not chase the latrina then the latrina miaou the vaclav. If the cherie miaou the vaclav and the cherie entrench the vaclav then the vaclav roast the cherie. If someone entrench the latrina and they are tsaristic then the latrina does not eat the cherie. If someone is tsaristic then they are omniscient. If someone is omniscient and not tsaristic then they visit the cherie. If someone is omniscient and not oval then they visit the cherie. The vaclav miaou the latrina.", "logic": "\nMiaou(vaclav, cherie)\nRoast(vaclav, latrina)\nnot Roast(vaclav, cherie)\nnot Cogitable(vaclav)\nnot Entrench(vaclav, latrina)\nRoast(latrina, cherie)\nMiaou(cherie, vaclav)\nRoast(cherie, vaclav)\nRoast(cherie, latrina)\nnot Oval(cherie)\nforall x (Miaou(x, cherie) -> Tsaristic(cherie))\nforall x (Roast(x, latrina) and not Roast(latrina, vaclav) -> not Oval(vaclav))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) and not Miaou(x, latrina) -> Miaou(latrina, vaclav))\nMiaou(cherie, vaclav) and Entrench(cherie, vaclav) -> Roast(vaclav, cherie)\nforall x (Entrench(x, latrina) and Tsaristic(x) -> not Roast(latrina, cherie))\nforall x (Tsaristic(x) -> Omniscient(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) and not Tsaristic(x) -> Entrench(x, cherie))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) and not Oval(x) -> Entrench(x, cherie))\n\nMiaou(vaclav, latrina)\n\nMiaou(vaclav, latrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1294"} {"premises": "Isobel is incomplete. Leonora is nightlong. Virgie is nightlong. Quiet, rubicund people are lento. If someone is nightlong then they are lento. If someone is curst and not rubicund then they are lento. If Virgie is curst and Virgie is incomplete then Virgie is not spangly. If someone is spangly then they are absorbed. If someone is lento then they are spangly. If someone is incomplete then they are spangly. All curst people are incomplete. Isobel is incomplete.", "logic": "\nIncomplete(isobel)\nNightlong(leonora)\nNightlong(virgie)\nforall x (Nightlong(x) and Rubicund(x) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Nightlong(x) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Curst(x) and not Rubicund(x) -> Lento(x))\nCurst(virgie) and Incomplete(virgie) -> not Spangly(virgie)\nforall x (Spangly(x) -> Absorbed(x))\nforall x (Lento(x) -> Spangly(x))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) -> Spangly(x))\nforall x (Curst(x) -> Incomplete(x))\n\nIncomplete(isobel)\n\ntherefore Incomplete(isobel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Elnar is perversive. Meghann is unframed. Gwendolin is unframed. Quiet, misguided people are raddled. If someone is unframed then they are raddled. If someone is capitulary and not misguided then they are raddled. If Gwendolin is capitulary and Gwendolin is perversive then Gwendolin is not neutral. If someone is neutral then they are formalized. If someone is raddled then they are neutral. If someone is perversive then they are neutral. All capitulary people are perversive. Gwendolin is not unframed.", "logic": "\nPerversive(elnar)\nUnframed(meghann)\nUnframed(gwendolin)\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Misguided(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Unframed(x) -> Raddled(x))\nforall x (Capitulary(x) and not Misguided(x) -> Raddled(x))\nCapitulary(gwendolin) and Perversive(gwendolin) -> not Neutral(gwendolin)\nforall x (Neutral(x) -> Formalized(x))\nforall x (Raddled(x) -> Neutral(x))\nforall x (Perversive(x) -> Neutral(x))\nforall x (Capitulary(x) -> Perversive(x))\n\nnot Unframed(gwendolin)\n\ntherefore Unframed(gwendolin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Merrill is holozoic. Ritchie is vermilion. Hetty is vermilion. Quiet, cosmologic people are squashed. If someone is vermilion then they are squashed. If someone is schismatic and not cosmologic then they are squashed. If Hetty is schismatic and Hetty is holozoic then Hetty is not five. If someone is five then they are algal. If someone is squashed then they are five. If someone is holozoic then they are five. All schismatic people are holozoic. Merrill is five.", "logic": "\nHolozoic(merrill)\nVermilion(ritchie)\nVermilion(hetty)\nforall x (Vermilion(x) and Cosmologic(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Vermilion(x) -> Squashed(x))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and not Cosmologic(x) -> Squashed(x))\nSchismatic(hetty) and Holozoic(hetty) -> not Five(hetty)\nforall x (Five(x) -> Algal(x))\nforall x (Squashed(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Holozoic(x) -> Five(x))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) -> Holozoic(x))\n\nFive(merrill)\n\nHolozoic(merrill) and forall x (Holozoic(x) -> Five(x)) -> therefore Five(merrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Odette is rash. Gallagher is rhyming. Sonya is rhyming. Quiet, unattired people are occurrent. If someone is rhyming then they are occurrent. If someone is infrahuman and not unattired then they are occurrent. If Sonya is infrahuman and Sonya is rash then Sonya is not fingerless. If someone is fingerless then they are enzootic. If someone is occurrent then they are fingerless. If someone is rash then they are fingerless. All infrahuman people are rash. Gallagher is not occurrent.", "logic": "\nRash(odette)\nRhyming(gallagher)\nRhyming(sonya)\nforall x (Rhyming(x) and Unattired(x) -> Occurrent(x))\nforall x (Rhyming(x) -> Occurrent(x))\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) and not Unattired(x) -> Occurrent(x))\nInfrahuman(sonya) and Rash(sonya) -> not Fingerless(sonya)\nforall x (Fingerless(x) -> Enzootic(x))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) -> Fingerless(x))\nforall x (Rash(x) -> Fingerless(x))\nforall x (Infrahuman(x) -> Rash(x))\n\nnot Occurrent(gallagher)\n\nRhyming(gallagher) and forall x (Rhyming(x) -> Occurrent(x)) -> therefore Occurrent(gallagher)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Moreen is ablaze. Mark is epizootic. Fazeel is epizootic. Quiet, casebook people are cured. If someone is epizootic then they are cured. If someone is strung and not casebook then they are cured. If Fazeel is strung and Fazeel is ablaze then Fazeel is not aliform. If someone is aliform then they are superior. If someone is cured then they are aliform. If someone is ablaze then they are aliform. All strung people are ablaze. Moreen is superior.", "logic": "\nAblaze(moreen)\nEpizootic(mark)\nEpizootic(fazeel)\nforall x (Epizootic(x) and Casebook(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Epizootic(x) -> Cured(x))\nforall x (Strung(x) and not Casebook(x) -> Cured(x))\nStrung(fazeel) and Ablaze(fazeel) -> not Aliform(fazeel)\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Superior(x))\nforall x (Cured(x) -> Aliform(x))\nforall x (Ablaze(x) -> Aliform(x))\nforall x (Strung(x) -> Ablaze(x))\n\nSuperior(moreen)\n\nAblaze(moreen) and forall x (Ablaze(x) -> Aliform(x)) -> therefore Aliform(moreen) Aliform(moreen) and forall x (Aliform(x) -> Superior(x)) -> therefore Superior(moreen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Georgine is geodetic. Danni is rippled. Hilarie is rippled. Quiet, nacreous people are stinky. If someone is rippled then they are stinky. If someone is adynamic and not nacreous then they are stinky. If Hilarie is adynamic and Hilarie is geodetic then Hilarie is not burry. If someone is burry then they are monitory. If someone is stinky then they are burry. If someone is geodetic then they are burry. All adynamic people are geodetic. Georgine is not monitory.", "logic": "\nGeodetic(georgine)\nRippled(danni)\nRippled(hilarie)\nforall x (Rippled(x) and Nacreous(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Rippled(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Adynamic(x) and not Nacreous(x) -> Stinky(x))\nAdynamic(hilarie) and Geodetic(hilarie) -> not Burry(hilarie)\nforall x (Burry(x) -> Monitory(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) -> Burry(x))\nforall x (Geodetic(x) -> Burry(x))\nforall x (Adynamic(x) -> Geodetic(x))\n\nnot Monitory(georgine)\n\nGeodetic(georgine) and forall x (Geodetic(x) -> Burry(x)) -> therefore Burry(georgine) Burry(georgine) and forall x (Burry(x) -> Monitory(x)) -> therefore Monitory(georgine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Adolph is saleable. Henka is slavish. Zelda is slavish. Quiet, known people are toilsome. If someone is slavish then they are toilsome. If someone is amusive and not known then they are toilsome. If Zelda is amusive and Zelda is saleable then Zelda is not ismaili. If someone is ismaili then they are caducean. If someone is toilsome then they are ismaili. If someone is saleable then they are ismaili. All amusive people are saleable. Zelda is caducean.", "logic": "\nSaleable(adolph)\nSlavish(henka)\nSlavish(zelda)\nforall x (Slavish(x) and Known(x) -> Toilsome(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) -> Toilsome(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) and not Known(x) -> Toilsome(x))\nAmusive(zelda) and Saleable(zelda) -> not Ismaili(zelda)\nforall x (Ismaili(x) -> Caducean(x))\nforall x (Toilsome(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nforall x (Saleable(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nforall x (Amusive(x) -> Saleable(x))\n\nCaducean(zelda)\n\nSlavish(zelda) and forall x (Slavish(x) -> Toilsome(x)) -> therefore Toilsome(zelda) Toilsome(zelda) and forall x (Toilsome(x) -> Ismaili(x)) -> therefore Ismaili(zelda) Ismaili(zelda) and forall x (Ismaili(x) -> Caducean(x)) -> therefore Caducean(zelda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Shawn is branded. Katerine is unicameral. Sindee is unicameral. Quiet, game people are sunbaked. If someone is unicameral then they are sunbaked. If someone is pinchbeck and not game then they are sunbaked. If Sindee is pinchbeck and Sindee is branded then Sindee is not slithering. If someone is slithering then they are spinnable. If someone is sunbaked then they are slithering. If someone is branded then they are slithering. All pinchbeck people are branded. Sindee is not spinnable.", "logic": "\nBranded(shawn)\nUnicameral(katerine)\nUnicameral(sindee)\nforall x (Unicameral(x) and Game(x) -> Sunbaked(x))\nforall x (Unicameral(x) -> Sunbaked(x))\nforall x (Pinchbeck(x) and not Game(x) -> Sunbaked(x))\nPinchbeck(sindee) and Branded(sindee) -> not Slithering(sindee)\nforall x (Slithering(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Slithering(x))\nforall x (Branded(x) -> Slithering(x))\nforall x (Pinchbeck(x) -> Branded(x))\n\nnot Spinnable(sindee)\n\nUnicameral(sindee) and forall x (Unicameral(x) -> Sunbaked(x)) -> therefore Sunbaked(sindee) Sunbaked(sindee) and forall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Slithering(x)) -> therefore Slithering(sindee) Slithering(sindee) and forall x (Slithering(x) -> Spinnable(x)) -> therefore Spinnable(sindee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Aleck is dreamy. Fern is attested. Carmina is attested. Quiet, idiopathic people are overage. If someone is attested then they are overage. If someone is essene and not idiopathic then they are overage. If Carmina is essene and Carmina is dreamy then Carmina is not unabridged. If someone is unabridged then they are croaky. If someone is overage then they are unabridged. If someone is dreamy then they are unabridged. All essene people are dreamy. Fern is not dreamy.", "logic": "\nDreamy(aleck)\nAttested(fern)\nAttested(carmina)\nforall x (Attested(x) and Idiopathic(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Attested(x) -> Overage(x))\nforall x (Essene(x) and not Idiopathic(x) -> Overage(x))\nEssene(carmina) and Dreamy(carmina) -> not Unabridged(carmina)\nforall x (Unabridged(x) -> Croaky(x))\nforall x (Overage(x) -> Unabridged(x))\nforall x (Dreamy(x) -> Unabridged(x))\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Dreamy(x))\n\nnot Dreamy(fern)\n\nforall x (Essene(x) -> Dreamy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Pippa is wartlike. Omar is checkered. Darin is checkered. Quiet, orbiculate people are hanoverian. If someone is checkered then they are hanoverian. If someone is amuck and not orbiculate then they are hanoverian. If Darin is amuck and Darin is wartlike then Darin is not rigorous. If someone is rigorous then they are esurient. If someone is hanoverian then they are rigorous. If someone is wartlike then they are rigorous. All amuck people are wartlike. Darin is wartlike.", "logic": "\nWartlike(pippa)\nCheckered(omar)\nCheckered(darin)\nforall x (Checkered(x) and Orbiculate(x) -> Hanoverian(x))\nforall x (Checkered(x) -> Hanoverian(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) and not Orbiculate(x) -> Hanoverian(x))\nAmuck(darin) and Wartlike(darin) -> not Rigorous(darin)\nforall x (Rigorous(x) -> Esurient(x))\nforall x (Hanoverian(x) -> Rigorous(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Rigorous(x))\nforall x (Amuck(x) -> Wartlike(x))\n\nWartlike(darin)\n\nforall x (Amuck(x) -> Wartlike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Doralyn is isochronal. Megan is encrusted. Erminie is encrusted. Quiet, spondaic people are distinct. If someone is encrusted then they are distinct. If someone is linear and not spondaic then they are distinct. If Erminie is linear and Erminie is isochronal then Erminie is not glad. If someone is glad then they are ostensive. If someone is distinct then they are glad. If someone is isochronal then they are glad. All linear people are isochronal. Doralyn is not distinct.", "logic": "\nIsochronal(doralyn)\nEncrusted(megan)\nEncrusted(erminie)\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and Spondaic(x) -> Distinct(x))\nforall x (Encrusted(x) -> Distinct(x))\nforall x (Linear(x) and not Spondaic(x) -> Distinct(x))\nLinear(erminie) and Isochronal(erminie) -> not Glad(erminie)\nforall x (Glad(x) -> Ostensive(x))\nforall x (Distinct(x) -> Glad(x))\nforall x (Isochronal(x) -> Glad(x))\nforall x (Linear(x) -> Isochronal(x))\n\nnot Distinct(doralyn)\n\nforall x (Encrusted(x) and Spondaic(x) -> Distinct(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Siana is asthmatic. Mehetabel is nutritious. Westbrook is nutritious. Quiet, cilial people are gusty. If someone is nutritious then they are gusty. If someone is prospering and not cilial then they are gusty. If Westbrook is prospering and Westbrook is asthmatic then Westbrook is not wintery. If someone is wintery then they are beforehand. If someone is gusty then they are wintery. If someone is asthmatic then they are wintery. All prospering people are asthmatic. Siana is cilial.", "logic": "\nAsthmatic(siana)\nNutritious(mehetabel)\nNutritious(westbrook)\nforall x (Nutritious(x) and Cilial(x) -> Gusty(x))\nforall x (Nutritious(x) -> Gusty(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) and not Cilial(x) -> Gusty(x))\nProspering(westbrook) and Asthmatic(westbrook) -> not Wintery(westbrook)\nforall x (Wintery(x) -> Beforehand(x))\nforall x (Gusty(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Asthmatic(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Prospering(x) -> Asthmatic(x))\n\nCilial(siana)\n\nCilial(siana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Nova is zealous. Melli is byzantine. Juline is byzantine. Quiet, adoptive people are jailed. If someone is byzantine then they are jailed. If someone is untasted and not adoptive then they are jailed. If Juline is untasted and Juline is zealous then Juline is not oleaginous. If someone is oleaginous then they are windburnt. If someone is jailed then they are oleaginous. If someone is zealous then they are oleaginous. All untasted people are zealous. Melli is not untasted.", "logic": "\nZealous(nova)\nByzantine(melli)\nByzantine(juline)\nforall x (Byzantine(x) and Adoptive(x) -> Jailed(x))\nforall x (Byzantine(x) -> Jailed(x))\nforall x (Untasted(x) and not Adoptive(x) -> Jailed(x))\nUntasted(juline) and Zealous(juline) -> not Oleaginous(juline)\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Windburnt(x))\nforall x (Jailed(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Zealous(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Untasted(x) -> Zealous(x))\n\nnot Untasted(melli)\n\nnot Untasted(melli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Cicily is unrifled. Allene is writhed. Genni is writhed. Quiet, distrait people are sinister. If someone is writhed then they are sinister. If someone is hungarian and not distrait then they are sinister. If Genni is hungarian and Genni is unrifled then Genni is not afrikaner. If someone is afrikaner then they are gushy. If someone is sinister then they are afrikaner. If someone is unrifled then they are afrikaner. All hungarian people are unrifled. Allene is distrait.", "logic": "\nUnrifled(cicily)\nWrithed(allene)\nWrithed(genni)\nforall x (Writhed(x) and Distrait(x) -> Sinister(x))\nforall x (Writhed(x) -> Sinister(x))\nforall x (Hungarian(x) and not Distrait(x) -> Sinister(x))\nHungarian(genni) and Unrifled(genni) -> not Afrikaner(genni)\nforall x (Afrikaner(x) -> Gushy(x))\nforall x (Sinister(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> Afrikaner(x))\nforall x (Hungarian(x) -> Unrifled(x))\n\nDistrait(allene)\n\nDistrait(allene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Sher is stainable. Pru is variolar. Dari is variolar. Quiet, bulbous people are silvern. If someone is variolar then they are silvern. If someone is stable and not bulbous then they are silvern. If Dari is stable and Dari is stainable then Dari is not backed. If someone is backed then they are leechlike. If someone is silvern then they are backed. If someone is stainable then they are backed. All stable people are stainable. Dari is not bulbous.", "logic": "\nStainable(sher)\nVariolar(pru)\nVariolar(dari)\nforall x (Variolar(x) and Bulbous(x) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Variolar(x) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Stable(x) and not Bulbous(x) -> Silvern(x))\nStable(dari) and Stainable(dari) -> not Backed(dari)\nforall x (Backed(x) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) -> Backed(x))\nforall x (Stainable(x) -> Backed(x))\nforall x (Stable(x) -> Stainable(x))\n\nnot Bulbous(dari)\n\nnot Bulbous(dari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "Ana is sinister. Marijo is septicemic. Aleta is septicemic. Quiet, apodous people are located. If someone is septicemic then they are located. If someone is unhindered and not apodous then they are located. If Aleta is unhindered and Aleta is sinister then Aleta is not extendable. If someone is extendable then they are prenatal. If someone is located then they are extendable. If someone is sinister then they are extendable. All unhindered people are sinister. Ana is unhindered.", "logic": "\nSinister(ana)\nSepticemic(marijo)\nSepticemic(aleta)\nforall x (Septicemic(x) and Apodous(x) -> Located(x))\nforall x (Septicemic(x) -> Located(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) and not Apodous(x) -> Located(x))\nUnhindered(aleta) and Sinister(aleta) -> not Extendable(aleta)\nforall x (Extendable(x) -> Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Located(x) -> Extendable(x))\nforall x (Sinister(x) -> Extendable(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Sinister(x))\n\nUnhindered(ana)\n\nUnhindered(ana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-340"} {"premises": "The barnard glisten the tamarra. The tamarra peel the barnard. The aziz peel the barnard. If something glisten the barnard and the barnard bean the tamarra then the barnard is regimental. If something glisten the barnard and it peel the barnard then it bean the barnard. If something glisten the tamarra then the tamarra glisten the barnard. If something glisten the tamarra and it bean the tamarra then the tamarra bean the aziz. If something bean the barnard and the barnard glisten the tamarra then the tamarra peel the barnard. If something is sleety and it bean the tamarra then it bean the aziz. The tamarra peel the barnard.", "logic": "\nGlisten(barnard, tamarra)\nPeel(tamarra, barnard)\nPeel(aziz, barnard)\nforall x (Glisten(x, barnard) and Bean(barnard, tamarra) -> Regimental(barnard))\nforall x (Glisten(x, barnard) and Peel(x, barnard) -> Bean(x, barnard))\nforall x (Glisten(x, tamarra) -> Glisten(tamarra, barnard))\nforall x (Glisten(x, tamarra) and Bean(x, tamarra) -> Bean(tamarra, aziz))\nforall x (Bean(x, barnard) and Glisten(barnard, tamarra) -> Peel(tamarra, barnard))\nforall x (Sleety(x) and Bean(x, tamarra) -> Bean(x, aziz))\n\nPeel(tamarra, barnard)\n\ntherefore Peel(tamarra, barnard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The sabina brominate the hill. The hill ablate the sabina. The dawna ablate the sabina. If something brominate the sabina and the sabina reconfirm the hill then the sabina is sarcosomal. If something brominate the sabina and it ablate the sabina then it reconfirm the sabina. If something brominate the hill then the hill brominate the sabina. If something brominate the hill and it reconfirm the hill then the hill reconfirm the dawna. If something reconfirm the sabina and the sabina brominate the hill then the hill ablate the sabina. If something is primo and it reconfirm the hill then it reconfirm the dawna. The dawna does not need the sabina.", "logic": "\nBrominate(sabina, hill)\nAblate(hill, sabina)\nAblate(dawna, sabina)\nforall x (Brominate(x, sabina) and Reconfirm(sabina, hill) -> Sarcosomal(sabina))\nforall x (Brominate(x, sabina) and Ablate(x, sabina) -> Reconfirm(x, sabina))\nforall x (Brominate(x, hill) -> Brominate(hill, sabina))\nforall x (Brominate(x, hill) and Reconfirm(x, hill) -> Reconfirm(hill, dawna))\nforall x (Reconfirm(x, sabina) and Brominate(sabina, hill) -> Ablate(hill, sabina))\nforall x (Primo(x) and Reconfirm(x, hill) -> Reconfirm(x, dawna))\n\nnot Ablate(dawna, sabina)\n\ntherefore Ablate(dawna, sabina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The charlene sport the natalee. The natalee intrench the charlene. The rachel intrench the charlene. If something sport the charlene and the charlene ejaculate the natalee then the charlene is empty. If something sport the charlene and it intrench the charlene then it ejaculate the charlene. If something sport the natalee then the natalee sport the charlene. If something sport the natalee and it ejaculate the natalee then the natalee ejaculate the rachel. If something ejaculate the charlene and the charlene sport the natalee then the natalee intrench the charlene. If something is agitative and it ejaculate the natalee then it ejaculate the rachel. The natalee sport the charlene.", "logic": "\nSport(charlene, natalee)\nIntrench(natalee, charlene)\nIntrench(rachel, charlene)\nforall x (Sport(x, charlene) and Ejaculate(charlene, natalee) -> Empty(charlene))\nforall x (Sport(x, charlene) and Intrench(x, charlene) -> Ejaculate(x, charlene))\nforall x (Sport(x, natalee) -> Sport(natalee, charlene))\nforall x (Sport(x, natalee) and Ejaculate(x, natalee) -> Ejaculate(natalee, rachel))\nforall x (Ejaculate(x, charlene) and Sport(charlene, natalee) -> Intrench(natalee, charlene))\nforall x (Agitative(x) and Ejaculate(x, natalee) -> Ejaculate(x, rachel))\n\nSport(natalee, charlene)\n\nSport(charlene, natalee) and forall x (Sport(x, natalee) -> Sport(natalee, charlene)) -> therefore Sport(natalee, charlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The edgar bestialize the derick. The derick gangrene the edgar. The kira gangrene the edgar. If something bestialize the edgar and the edgar nettle the derick then the edgar is unspecific. If something bestialize the edgar and it gangrene the edgar then it nettle the edgar. If something bestialize the derick then the derick bestialize the edgar. If something bestialize the derick and it nettle the derick then the derick nettle the kira. If something nettle the edgar and the edgar bestialize the derick then the derick gangrene the edgar. If something is jawless and it nettle the derick then it nettle the kira. The derick does not like the edgar.", "logic": "\nBestialize(edgar, derick)\nGangrene(derick, edgar)\nGangrene(kira, edgar)\nforall x (Bestialize(x, edgar) and Nettle(edgar, derick) -> Unspecific(edgar))\nforall x (Bestialize(x, edgar) and Gangrene(x, edgar) -> Nettle(x, edgar))\nforall x (Bestialize(x, derick) -> Bestialize(derick, edgar))\nforall x (Bestialize(x, derick) and Nettle(x, derick) -> Nettle(derick, kira))\nforall x (Nettle(x, edgar) and Bestialize(edgar, derick) -> Gangrene(derick, edgar))\nforall x (Jawless(x) and Nettle(x, derick) -> Nettle(x, kira))\n\nnot Bestialize(derick, edgar)\n\nBestialize(edgar, derick) and forall x (Bestialize(x, derick) -> Bestialize(derick, edgar)) -> therefore Bestialize(derick, edgar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The mella resound the vanda. The vanda halt the mella. The edie halt the mella. If something resound the mella and the mella redden the vanda then the mella is workable. If something resound the mella and it halt the mella then it redden the mella. If something resound the vanda then the vanda resound the mella. If something resound the vanda and it redden the vanda then the vanda redden the edie. If something redden the mella and the mella resound the vanda then the vanda halt the mella. If something is swank and it redden the vanda then it redden the edie. The vanda redden the mella.", "logic": "\nResound(mella, vanda)\nHalt(vanda, mella)\nHalt(edie, mella)\nforall x (Resound(x, mella) and Redden(mella, vanda) -> Workable(mella))\nforall x (Resound(x, mella) and Halt(x, mella) -> Redden(x, mella))\nforall x (Resound(x, vanda) -> Resound(vanda, mella))\nforall x (Resound(x, vanda) and Redden(x, vanda) -> Redden(vanda, edie))\nforall x (Redden(x, mella) and Resound(mella, vanda) -> Halt(vanda, mella))\nforall x (Swank(x) and Redden(x, vanda) -> Redden(x, edie))\n\nRedden(vanda, mella)\n\nResound(mella, vanda) and forall x (Resound(x, vanda) -> Resound(vanda, mella)) -> therefore Resound(vanda, mella) Resound(vanda, mella) and Halt(vanda, mella) and forall x (Resound(x, mella) and Halt(x, mella) -> Redden(x, mella)) -> therefore Redden(vanda, mella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The wes bechance the camella. The camella sailplane the wes. The giffer sailplane the wes. If something bechance the wes and the wes creolize the camella then the wes is dumbstruck. If something bechance the wes and it sailplane the wes then it creolize the wes. If something bechance the camella then the camella bechance the wes. If something bechance the camella and it creolize the camella then the camella creolize the giffer. If something creolize the wes and the wes bechance the camella then the camella sailplane the wes. If something is mesozoic and it creolize the camella then it creolize the giffer. The camella does not see the wes.", "logic": "\nBechance(wes, camella)\nSailplane(camella, wes)\nSailplane(giffer, wes)\nforall x (Bechance(x, wes) and Creolize(wes, camella) -> Dumbstruck(wes))\nforall x (Bechance(x, wes) and Sailplane(x, wes) -> Creolize(x, wes))\nforall x (Bechance(x, camella) -> Bechance(camella, wes))\nforall x (Bechance(x, camella) and Creolize(x, camella) -> Creolize(camella, giffer))\nforall x (Creolize(x, wes) and Bechance(wes, camella) -> Sailplane(camella, wes))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) and Creolize(x, camella) -> Creolize(x, giffer))\n\nnot Creolize(camella, wes)\n\nBechance(wes, camella) and forall x (Bechance(x, camella) -> Bechance(camella, wes)) -> therefore Bechance(camella, wes) Bechance(camella, wes) and Sailplane(camella, wes) and forall x (Bechance(x, wes) and Sailplane(x, wes) -> Creolize(x, wes)) -> therefore Creolize(camella, wes)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The marika alarm the dawson. The dawson radiate the marika. The dick radiate the marika. If something alarm the marika and the marika transcribe the dawson then the marika is patronized. If something alarm the marika and it radiate the marika then it transcribe the marika. If something alarm the dawson then the dawson alarm the marika. If something alarm the dawson and it transcribe the dawson then the dawson transcribe the dick. If something transcribe the marika and the marika alarm the dawson then the dawson radiate the marika. If something is radiant and it transcribe the dawson then it transcribe the dick. The dawson does not see the dick.", "logic": "\nAlarm(marika, dawson)\nRadiate(dawson, marika)\nRadiate(dick, marika)\nforall x (Alarm(x, marika) and Transcribe(marika, dawson) -> Patronized(marika))\nforall x (Alarm(x, marika) and Radiate(x, marika) -> Transcribe(x, marika))\nforall x (Alarm(x, dawson) -> Alarm(dawson, marika))\nforall x (Alarm(x, dawson) and Transcribe(x, dawson) -> Transcribe(dawson, dick))\nforall x (Transcribe(x, marika) and Alarm(marika, dawson) -> Radiate(dawson, marika))\nforall x (Radiant(x) and Transcribe(x, dawson) -> Transcribe(x, dick))\n\nnot Transcribe(dawson, dick)\n\nforall x (Alarm(x, dawson) and Transcribe(x, dawson) -> Transcribe(dawson, dick)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The michael convey the chandal. The chandal trace the michael. The danica trace the michael. If something convey the michael and the michael jockey the chandal then the michael is veridical. If something convey the michael and it trace the michael then it jockey the michael. If something convey the chandal then the chandal convey the michael. If something convey the chandal and it jockey the chandal then the chandal jockey the danica. If something jockey the michael and the michael convey the chandal then the chandal trace the michael. If something is secretive and it jockey the chandal then it jockey the danica. The michael jockey the danica.", "logic": "\nConvey(michael, chandal)\nTrace(chandal, michael)\nTrace(danica, michael)\nforall x (Convey(x, michael) and Jockey(michael, chandal) -> Veridical(michael))\nforall x (Convey(x, michael) and Trace(x, michael) -> Jockey(x, michael))\nforall x (Convey(x, chandal) -> Convey(chandal, michael))\nforall x (Convey(x, chandal) and Jockey(x, chandal) -> Jockey(chandal, danica))\nforall x (Jockey(x, michael) and Convey(michael, chandal) -> Trace(chandal, michael))\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Jockey(x, chandal) -> Jockey(x, danica))\n\nJockey(michael, danica)\n\nforall x (Secretive(x) and Jockey(x, chandal) -> Jockey(x, danica)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The hanny brand the gisella. The gisella bespeak the hanny. The guillermo bespeak the hanny. If something brand the hanny and the hanny vacate the gisella then the hanny is needled. If something brand the hanny and it bespeak the hanny then it vacate the hanny. If something brand the gisella then the gisella brand the hanny. If something brand the gisella and it vacate the gisella then the gisella vacate the guillermo. If something vacate the hanny and the hanny brand the gisella then the gisella bespeak the hanny. If something is accordant and it vacate the gisella then it vacate the guillermo. The guillermo does not see the hanny.", "logic": "\nBrand(hanny, gisella)\nBespeak(gisella, hanny)\nBespeak(guillermo, hanny)\nforall x (Brand(x, hanny) and Vacate(hanny, gisella) -> Needled(hanny))\nforall x (Brand(x, hanny) and Bespeak(x, hanny) -> Vacate(x, hanny))\nforall x (Brand(x, gisella) -> Brand(gisella, hanny))\nforall x (Brand(x, gisella) and Vacate(x, gisella) -> Vacate(gisella, guillermo))\nforall x (Vacate(x, hanny) and Brand(hanny, gisella) -> Bespeak(gisella, hanny))\nforall x (Accordant(x) and Vacate(x, gisella) -> Vacate(x, guillermo))\n\nnot Vacate(guillermo, hanny)\n\nforall x (Brand(x, hanny) and Bespeak(x, hanny) -> Vacate(x, hanny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The nat expatriate the gerry. The gerry unsettle the nat. The keefe unsettle the nat. If something expatriate the nat and the nat marbleize the gerry then the nat is corrected. If something expatriate the nat and it unsettle the nat then it marbleize the nat. If something expatriate the gerry then the gerry expatriate the nat. If something expatriate the gerry and it marbleize the gerry then the gerry marbleize the keefe. If something marbleize the nat and the nat expatriate the gerry then the gerry unsettle the nat. If something is briny and it marbleize the gerry then it marbleize the keefe. The gerry is briny.", "logic": "\nExpatriate(nat, gerry)\nUnsettle(gerry, nat)\nUnsettle(keefe, nat)\nforall x (Expatriate(x, nat) and Marbleize(nat, gerry) -> Corrected(nat))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, nat) and Unsettle(x, nat) -> Marbleize(x, nat))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, gerry) -> Expatriate(gerry, nat))\nforall x (Expatriate(x, gerry) and Marbleize(x, gerry) -> Marbleize(gerry, keefe))\nforall x (Marbleize(x, nat) and Expatriate(nat, gerry) -> Unsettle(gerry, nat))\nforall x (Briny(x) and Marbleize(x, gerry) -> Marbleize(x, keefe))\n\nBriny(gerry)\n\nBriny(gerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The hill dummy the grazia. The grazia service the hill. The jori service the hill. If something dummy the hill and the hill lodge the grazia then the hill is forward. If something dummy the hill and it service the hill then it lodge the hill. If something dummy the grazia then the grazia dummy the hill. If something dummy the grazia and it lodge the grazia then the grazia lodge the jori. If something lodge the hill and the hill dummy the grazia then the grazia service the hill. If something is manorial and it lodge the grazia then it lodge the jori. The jori is not forward.", "logic": "\nDummy(hill, grazia)\nService(grazia, hill)\nService(jori, hill)\nforall x (Dummy(x, hill) and Lodge(hill, grazia) -> Forward(hill))\nforall x (Dummy(x, hill) and Service(x, hill) -> Lodge(x, hill))\nforall x (Dummy(x, grazia) -> Dummy(grazia, hill))\nforall x (Dummy(x, grazia) and Lodge(x, grazia) -> Lodge(grazia, jori))\nforall x (Lodge(x, hill) and Dummy(hill, grazia) -> Service(grazia, hill))\nforall x (Manorial(x) and Lodge(x, grazia) -> Lodge(x, jori))\n\nnot Forward(jori)\n\nnot Forward(jori) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "The buffy cite the theodore. The theodore part the buffy. The demetri part the buffy. If something cite the buffy and the buffy poise the theodore then the buffy is harnessed. If something cite the buffy and it part the buffy then it poise the buffy. If something cite the theodore then the theodore cite the buffy. If something cite the theodore and it poise the theodore then the theodore poise the demetri. If something poise the buffy and the buffy cite the theodore then the theodore part the buffy. If something is gray and it poise the theodore then it poise the demetri. The buffy part the demetri.", "logic": "\nCite(buffy, theodore)\nPart(theodore, buffy)\nPart(demetri, buffy)\nforall x (Cite(x, buffy) and Poise(buffy, theodore) -> Harnessed(buffy))\nforall x (Cite(x, buffy) and Part(x, buffy) -> Poise(x, buffy))\nforall x (Cite(x, theodore) -> Cite(theodore, buffy))\nforall x (Cite(x, theodore) and Poise(x, theodore) -> Poise(theodore, demetri))\nforall x (Poise(x, buffy) and Cite(buffy, theodore) -> Part(theodore, buffy))\nforall x (Gray(x) and Poise(x, theodore) -> Poise(x, demetri))\n\nPart(buffy, demetri)\n\nPart(buffy, demetri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-634"} {"premises": "Sunshine is modal. Sunshine is rural. Sunshine is intense. Sunshine is searing. Dania is wartlike. Nickey is rural. Nickey is festive. Nickey is searing. Tommy is cometary. Tommy is searing. If someone is wartlike then they are intense. If someone is festive then they are modal. If someone is intense then they are festive. Sunshine is intense.", "logic": "\nModal(sunshine)\nRural(sunshine)\nIntense(sunshine)\nSearing(sunshine)\nWartlike(dania)\nRural(nickey)\nFestive(nickey)\nSearing(nickey)\nCometary(tommy)\nSearing(tommy)\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Intense(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Modal(x))\nforall x (Intense(x) -> Festive(x))\n\nIntense(sunshine)\n\ntherefore Intense(sunshine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Jimbo is algerian. Jimbo is authorial. Jimbo is tartaric. Jimbo is briery. Rebecca is barbellate. Noel is authorial. Noel is contrasty. Noel is briery. Gladys is consoling. Gladys is briery. If someone is barbellate then they are tartaric. If someone is contrasty then they are algerian. If someone is tartaric then they are contrasty. Jimbo is not algerian.", "logic": "\nAlgerian(jimbo)\nAuthorial(jimbo)\nTartaric(jimbo)\nBriery(jimbo)\nBarbellate(rebecca)\nAuthorial(noel)\nContrasty(noel)\nBriery(noel)\nConsoling(gladys)\nBriery(gladys)\nforall x (Barbellate(x) -> Tartaric(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Algerian(x))\nforall x (Tartaric(x) -> Contrasty(x))\n\nnot Algerian(jimbo)\n\ntherefore Algerian(jimbo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Bebe is knitted. Bebe is schismatic. Bebe is hilarious. Bebe is adverbial. Rafael is testaceous. Marsiella is schismatic. Marsiella is parietal. Marsiella is adverbial. Issy is rainy. Issy is adverbial. If someone is testaceous then they are hilarious. If someone is parietal then they are knitted. If someone is hilarious then they are parietal. Bebe is parietal.", "logic": "\nKnitted(bebe)\nSchismatic(bebe)\nHilarious(bebe)\nAdverbial(bebe)\nTestaceous(rafael)\nSchismatic(marsiella)\nParietal(marsiella)\nAdverbial(marsiella)\nRainy(issy)\nAdverbial(issy)\nforall x (Testaceous(x) -> Hilarious(x))\nforall x (Parietal(x) -> Knitted(x))\nforall x (Hilarious(x) -> Parietal(x))\n\nParietal(bebe)\n\nHilarious(bebe) and forall x (Hilarious(x) -> Parietal(x)) -> therefore Parietal(bebe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Arne is hackneyed. Arne is overblown. Arne is nonhairy. Arne is zygotic. Adiana is paperlike. Susy is overblown. Susy is deaf. Susy is zygotic. Thedrick is carinate. Thedrick is zygotic. If someone is paperlike then they are nonhairy. If someone is deaf then they are hackneyed. If someone is nonhairy then they are deaf. Arne is not deaf.", "logic": "\nHackneyed(arne)\nOverblown(arne)\nNonhairy(arne)\nZygotic(arne)\nPaperlike(adiana)\nOverblown(susy)\nDeaf(susy)\nZygotic(susy)\nCarinate(thedrick)\nZygotic(thedrick)\nforall x (Paperlike(x) -> Nonhairy(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Hackneyed(x))\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Deaf(x))\n\nnot Deaf(arne)\n\nNonhairy(arne) and forall x (Nonhairy(x) -> Deaf(x)) -> therefore Deaf(arne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Cyrille is appositive. Cyrille is homosexual. Cyrille is retracted. Cyrille is procumbent. Nate is lecherous. Mavra is homosexual. Mavra is popliteal. Mavra is procumbent. Belia is unwritten. Belia is procumbent. If someone is lecherous then they are retracted. If someone is popliteal then they are appositive. If someone is retracted then they are popliteal. Nate is popliteal.", "logic": "\nAppositive(cyrille)\nHomosexual(cyrille)\nRetracted(cyrille)\nProcumbent(cyrille)\nLecherous(nate)\nHomosexual(mavra)\nPopliteal(mavra)\nProcumbent(mavra)\nUnwritten(belia)\nProcumbent(belia)\nforall x (Lecherous(x) -> Retracted(x))\nforall x (Popliteal(x) -> Appositive(x))\nforall x (Retracted(x) -> Popliteal(x))\n\nPopliteal(nate)\n\nLecherous(nate) and forall x (Lecherous(x) -> Retracted(x)) -> therefore Retracted(nate) Retracted(nate) and forall x (Retracted(x) -> Popliteal(x)) -> therefore Popliteal(nate)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Ulrica is antiguan. Ulrica is musky. Ulrica is cherubic. Ulrica is intense. Barret is trite. Travers is musky. Travers is puff. Travers is intense. Gigi is plenteous. Gigi is intense. If someone is trite then they are cherubic. If someone is puff then they are antiguan. If someone is cherubic then they are puff. Barret is not puff.", "logic": "\nAntiguan(ulrica)\nMusky(ulrica)\nCherubic(ulrica)\nIntense(ulrica)\nTrite(barret)\nMusky(travers)\nPuff(travers)\nIntense(travers)\nPlenteous(gigi)\nIntense(gigi)\nforall x (Trite(x) -> Cherubic(x))\nforall x (Puff(x) -> Antiguan(x))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) -> Puff(x))\n\nnot Puff(barret)\n\nTrite(barret) and forall x (Trite(x) -> Cherubic(x)) -> therefore Cherubic(barret) Cherubic(barret) and forall x (Cherubic(x) -> Puff(x)) -> therefore Puff(barret)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Marcela is expectant. Marcela is foiled. Marcela is cosy. Marcela is basined. Corinne is uplifted. Elysee is foiled. Elysee is syrian. Elysee is basined. Gennifer is eremitical. Gennifer is basined. If someone is uplifted then they are cosy. If someone is syrian then they are expectant. If someone is cosy then they are syrian. Corinne is expectant.", "logic": "\nExpectant(marcela)\nFoiled(marcela)\nCosy(marcela)\nBasined(marcela)\nUplifted(corinne)\nFoiled(elysee)\nSyrian(elysee)\nBasined(elysee)\nEremitical(gennifer)\nBasined(gennifer)\nforall x (Uplifted(x) -> Cosy(x))\nforall x (Syrian(x) -> Expectant(x))\nforall x (Cosy(x) -> Syrian(x))\n\nExpectant(corinne)\n\nUplifted(corinne) and forall x (Uplifted(x) -> Cosy(x)) -> therefore Cosy(corinne) Cosy(corinne) and forall x (Cosy(x) -> Syrian(x)) -> therefore Syrian(corinne) Syrian(corinne) and forall x (Syrian(x) -> Expectant(x)) -> therefore Expectant(corinne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Renado is weighty. Renado is hurt. Renado is mistakable. Renado is apostate. Rex is uninitiate. Grace is hurt. Grace is corinthian. Grace is apostate. Robert is sassy. Robert is apostate. If someone is uninitiate then they are mistakable. If someone is corinthian then they are weighty. If someone is mistakable then they are corinthian. Rex is not weighty.", "logic": "\nWeighty(renado)\nHurt(renado)\nMistakable(renado)\nApostate(renado)\nUninitiate(rex)\nHurt(grace)\nCorinthian(grace)\nApostate(grace)\nSassy(robert)\nApostate(robert)\nforall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Mistakable(x))\nforall x (Corinthian(x) -> Weighty(x))\nforall x (Mistakable(x) -> Corinthian(x))\n\nnot Weighty(rex)\n\nUninitiate(rex) and forall x (Uninitiate(x) -> Mistakable(x)) -> therefore Mistakable(rex) Mistakable(rex) and forall x (Mistakable(x) -> Corinthian(x)) -> therefore Corinthian(rex) Corinthian(rex) and forall x (Corinthian(x) -> Weighty(x)) -> therefore Weighty(rex)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Kaleena is trepid. Kaleena is unopposed. Kaleena is nourished. Kaleena is uncombined. Halvard is caesural. Atlante is unopposed. Atlante is willful. Atlante is uncombined. Rori is fireproof. Rori is uncombined. If someone is caesural then they are nourished. If someone is willful then they are trepid. If someone is nourished then they are willful. Rori is not trepid.", "logic": "\nTrepid(kaleena)\nUnopposed(kaleena)\nNourished(kaleena)\nUncombined(kaleena)\nCaesural(halvard)\nUnopposed(atlante)\nWillful(atlante)\nUncombined(atlante)\nFireproof(rori)\nUncombined(rori)\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Nourished(x))\nforall x (Willful(x) -> Trepid(x))\nforall x (Nourished(x) -> Willful(x))\n\nnot Trepid(rori)\n\nforall x (Willful(x) -> Trepid(x)) <- forall x (Nourished(x) -> Willful(x)) <- forall x (Caesural(x) -> Nourished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Dyna is queer. Dyna is evidenced. Dyna is monocled. Dyna is romantic. Thorny is jewelled. Burt is evidenced. Burt is mozambican. Burt is romantic. Sauncho is somnific. Sauncho is romantic. If someone is jewelled then they are monocled. If someone is mozambican then they are queer. If someone is monocled then they are mozambican. Sauncho is monocled.", "logic": "\nQueer(dyna)\nEvidenced(dyna)\nMonocled(dyna)\nRomantic(dyna)\nJewelled(thorny)\nEvidenced(burt)\nMozambican(burt)\nRomantic(burt)\nSomnific(sauncho)\nRomantic(sauncho)\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Monocled(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) -> Queer(x))\nforall x (Monocled(x) -> Mozambican(x))\n\nMonocled(sauncho)\n\nforall x (Jewelled(x) -> Monocled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Lorilee is awaited. Lorilee is acetonic. Lorilee is carnassial. Lorilee is sere. Janifer is edematous. Merrili is acetonic. Merrili is lenten. Merrili is sere. Felicle is algerian. Felicle is sere. If someone is edematous then they are carnassial. If someone is lenten then they are awaited. If someone is carnassial then they are lenten. Felicle is not lenten.", "logic": "\nAwaited(lorilee)\nAcetonic(lorilee)\nCarnassial(lorilee)\nSere(lorilee)\nEdematous(janifer)\nAcetonic(merrili)\nLenten(merrili)\nSere(merrili)\nAlgerian(felicle)\nSere(felicle)\nforall x (Edematous(x) -> Carnassial(x))\nforall x (Lenten(x) -> Awaited(x))\nforall x (Carnassial(x) -> Lenten(x))\n\nnot Lenten(felicle)\n\nforall x (Carnassial(x) -> Lenten(x)) <- forall x (Edematous(x) -> Carnassial(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Laurice is estival. Laurice is hygienic. Laurice is concluding. Laurice is damnatory. Berta is donnean. Allene is hygienic. Allene is advertised. Allene is damnatory. Nelia is oiled. Nelia is damnatory. If someone is donnean then they are concluding. If someone is advertised then they are estival. If someone is concluding then they are advertised. Allene is concluding.", "logic": "\nEstival(laurice)\nHygienic(laurice)\nConcluding(laurice)\nDamnatory(laurice)\nDonnean(berta)\nHygienic(allene)\nAdvertised(allene)\nDamnatory(allene)\nOiled(nelia)\nDamnatory(nelia)\nforall x (Donnean(x) -> Concluding(x))\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> Estival(x))\nforall x (Concluding(x) -> Advertised(x))\n\nConcluding(allene)\n\nforall x (Donnean(x) -> Concluding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Arlana is frowzled. Arlana is improper. Arlana is polar. Arlana is acanthous. Evelina is stern. Natalya is improper. Natalya is celestial. Natalya is acanthous. Syd is mimetic. Syd is acanthous. If someone is stern then they are polar. If someone is celestial then they are frowzled. If someone is polar then they are celestial. Natalya is not stern.", "logic": "\nFrowzled(arlana)\nImproper(arlana)\nPolar(arlana)\nAcanthous(arlana)\nStern(evelina)\nImproper(natalya)\nCelestial(natalya)\nAcanthous(natalya)\nMimetic(syd)\nAcanthous(syd)\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Polar(x))\nforall x (Celestial(x) -> Frowzled(x))\nforall x (Polar(x) -> Celestial(x))\n\nnot Stern(natalya)\n\nnot Stern(natalya) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Charity is causeless. Charity is cyclonic. Charity is cushioned. Charity is twilit. Ophelia is bisontine. Tallie is cyclonic. Tallie is congruous. Tallie is twilit. Meir is avian. Meir is twilit. If someone is bisontine then they are cushioned. If someone is congruous then they are causeless. If someone is cushioned then they are congruous. Charity is bisontine.", "logic": "\nCauseless(charity)\nCyclonic(charity)\nCushioned(charity)\nTwilit(charity)\nBisontine(ophelia)\nCyclonic(tallie)\nCongruous(tallie)\nTwilit(tallie)\nAvian(meir)\nTwilit(meir)\nforall x (Bisontine(x) -> Cushioned(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) -> Causeless(x))\nforall x (Cushioned(x) -> Congruous(x))\n\nBisontine(charity)\n\nBisontine(charity) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Hamlen is turgid. Hamlen is stomatous. Hamlen is purging. Hamlen is fawning. Jane is airless. Elsy is stomatous. Elsy is prima. Elsy is fawning. Liliane is medical. Liliane is fawning. If someone is airless then they are purging. If someone is prima then they are turgid. If someone is purging then they are prima. Jane is not stomatous.", "logic": "\nTurgid(hamlen)\nStomatous(hamlen)\nPurging(hamlen)\nFawning(hamlen)\nAirless(jane)\nStomatous(elsy)\nPrima(elsy)\nFawning(elsy)\nMedical(liliane)\nFawning(liliane)\nforall x (Airless(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Prima(x) -> Turgid(x))\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Prima(x))\n\nnot Stomatous(jane)\n\nnot Stomatous(jane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Rora is beta. Rora is lethargic. Rora is sylvan. Rora is greater. Fortune is frumpish. Neysa is lethargic. Neysa is unexcited. Neysa is greater. Bernetta is enviable. Bernetta is greater. If someone is frumpish then they are sylvan. If someone is unexcited then they are beta. If someone is sylvan then they are unexcited. Fortune is enviable.", "logic": "\nBeta(rora)\nLethargic(rora)\nSylvan(rora)\nGreater(rora)\nFrumpish(fortune)\nLethargic(neysa)\nUnexcited(neysa)\nGreater(neysa)\nEnviable(bernetta)\nGreater(bernetta)\nforall x (Frumpish(x) -> Sylvan(x))\nforall x (Unexcited(x) -> Beta(x))\nforall x (Sylvan(x) -> Unexcited(x))\n\nEnviable(fortune)\n\nEnviable(fortune) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-23"} {"premises": "Fitz is basophilic. Fitz is dried. Mendie is basophilic. Mendie is descending. Bekki is dried. Emili is basophilic. Emili is factitious. White, dried things are factitious. If something is factitious and basophilic then it is jumbled. If something is jumbled then it is done. All done, jumbled things are descending. White, dried things are done. If something is descending and basophilic then it is factitious. If Bekki is done then Bekki is dried. If Mendie is dried and Mendie is basophilic then Mendie is jumbled. Fitz is basophilic.", "logic": "\nBasophilic(fitz)\nDried(fitz)\nBasophilic(mendie)\nDescending(mendie)\nDried(bekki)\nBasophilic(emili)\nFactitious(emili)\nforall x (Descending(x) and Dried(x) -> Factitious(x))\nforall x (Factitious(x) and Basophilic(x) -> Jumbled(x))\nforall x (Jumbled(x) -> Done(x))\nforall x (Done(x) and Jumbled(x) -> Descending(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) and Dried(x) -> Done(x))\nforall x (Descending(x) and Basophilic(x) -> Factitious(x))\nDone(bekki) -> Dried(bekki)\nDried(mendie) and Basophilic(mendie) -> Jumbled(mendie)\n\nBasophilic(fitz)\n\ntherefore Basophilic(fitz)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Kirbie is sprigged. Kirbie is passerine. Latashia is sprigged. Latashia is motorized. Freda is passerine. Loralie is sprigged. Loralie is swept. White, passerine things are swept. If something is swept and sprigged then it is subscript. If something is subscript then it is spongy. All spongy, subscript things are motorized. White, passerine things are spongy. If something is motorized and sprigged then it is swept. If Freda is spongy then Freda is passerine. If Latashia is passerine and Latashia is sprigged then Latashia is subscript. Kirbie is not passerine.", "logic": "\nSprigged(kirbie)\nPasserine(kirbie)\nSprigged(latashia)\nMotorized(latashia)\nPasserine(freda)\nSprigged(loralie)\nSwept(loralie)\nforall x (Motorized(x) and Passerine(x) -> Swept(x))\nforall x (Swept(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Subscript(x))\nforall x (Subscript(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Spongy(x) and Subscript(x) -> Motorized(x))\nforall x (Motorized(x) and Passerine(x) -> Spongy(x))\nforall x (Motorized(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Swept(x))\nSpongy(freda) -> Passerine(freda)\nPasserine(latashia) and Sprigged(latashia) -> Subscript(latashia)\n\nnot Passerine(kirbie)\n\ntherefore Passerine(kirbie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Shelby is bovine. Shelby is moneyed. Rosaline is bovine. Rosaline is adjustable. Yule is moneyed. Puff is bovine. Puff is untrained. White, moneyed things are untrained. If something is untrained and bovine then it is florentine. If something is florentine then it is adpressed. All adpressed, florentine things are adjustable. White, moneyed things are adpressed. If something is adjustable and bovine then it is untrained. If Yule is adpressed then Yule is moneyed. If Rosaline is moneyed and Rosaline is bovine then Rosaline is florentine. Rosaline is untrained.", "logic": "\nBovine(shelby)\nMoneyed(shelby)\nBovine(rosaline)\nAdjustable(rosaline)\nMoneyed(yule)\nBovine(puff)\nUntrained(puff)\nforall x (Adjustable(x) and Moneyed(x) -> Untrained(x))\nforall x (Untrained(x) and Bovine(x) -> Florentine(x))\nforall x (Florentine(x) -> Adpressed(x))\nforall x (Adpressed(x) and Florentine(x) -> Adjustable(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) and Moneyed(x) -> Adpressed(x))\nforall x (Adjustable(x) and Bovine(x) -> Untrained(x))\nAdpressed(yule) -> Moneyed(yule)\nMoneyed(rosaline) and Bovine(rosaline) -> Florentine(rosaline)\n\nUntrained(rosaline)\n\nAdjustable(rosaline) and Bovine(rosaline) and forall x (Adjustable(x) and Bovine(x) -> Untrained(x)) -> therefore Untrained(rosaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Viviyan is aramaean. Viviyan is jarring. Uriel is aramaean. Uriel is prenatal. Rosita is jarring. Carter is aramaean. Carter is yuman. White, jarring things are yuman. If something is yuman and aramaean then it is winless. If something is winless then it is taoist. All taoist, winless things are prenatal. White, jarring things are taoist. If something is prenatal and aramaean then it is yuman. If Rosita is taoist then Rosita is jarring. If Uriel is jarring and Uriel is aramaean then Uriel is winless. Carter is not winless.", "logic": "\nAramaean(viviyan)\nJarring(viviyan)\nAramaean(uriel)\nPrenatal(uriel)\nJarring(rosita)\nAramaean(carter)\nYuman(carter)\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and Jarring(x) -> Yuman(x))\nforall x (Yuman(x) and Aramaean(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) -> Taoist(x))\nforall x (Taoist(x) and Winless(x) -> Prenatal(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and Jarring(x) -> Taoist(x))\nforall x (Prenatal(x) and Aramaean(x) -> Yuman(x))\nTaoist(rosita) -> Jarring(rosita)\nJarring(uriel) and Aramaean(uriel) -> Winless(uriel)\n\nnot Winless(carter)\n\nYuman(carter) and Aramaean(carter) and forall x (Yuman(x) and Aramaean(x) -> Winless(x)) -> therefore Winless(carter)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Odessa is synovial. Odessa is appealable. Whit is synovial. Whit is venereal. Belita is appealable. Carlos is synovial. Carlos is filled. White, appealable things are filled. If something is filled and synovial then it is epileptic. If something is epileptic then it is pessimum. All pessimum, epileptic things are venereal. White, appealable things are pessimum. If something is venereal and synovial then it is filled. If Belita is pessimum then Belita is appealable. If Whit is appealable and Whit is synovial then Whit is epileptic. Whit is epileptic.", "logic": "\nSynovial(odessa)\nAppealable(odessa)\nSynovial(whit)\nVenereal(whit)\nAppealable(belita)\nSynovial(carlos)\nFilled(carlos)\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Appealable(x) -> Filled(x))\nforall x (Filled(x) and Synovial(x) -> Epileptic(x))\nforall x (Epileptic(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) and Epileptic(x) -> Venereal(x))\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Appealable(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Venereal(x) and Synovial(x) -> Filled(x))\nPessimum(belita) -> Appealable(belita)\nAppealable(whit) and Synovial(whit) -> Epileptic(whit)\n\nEpileptic(whit)\n\nVenereal(whit) and Synovial(whit) and forall x (Venereal(x) and Synovial(x) -> Filled(x)) -> therefore Filled(whit) Filled(whit) and Synovial(whit) and forall x (Filled(x) and Synovial(x) -> Epileptic(x)) -> therefore Epileptic(whit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Cherri is aroid. Cherri is trig. Kaylyn is aroid. Kaylyn is neurologic. Orelee is trig. Yetta is aroid. Yetta is solvent. White, trig things are solvent. If something is solvent and aroid then it is calculous. If something is calculous then it is disgustful. All disgustful, calculous things are neurologic. White, trig things are disgustful. If something is neurologic and aroid then it is solvent. If Orelee is disgustful then Orelee is trig. If Kaylyn is trig and Kaylyn is aroid then Kaylyn is calculous. Kaylyn is not calculous.", "logic": "\nAroid(cherri)\nTrig(cherri)\nAroid(kaylyn)\nNeurologic(kaylyn)\nTrig(orelee)\nAroid(yetta)\nSolvent(yetta)\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Trig(x) -> Solvent(x))\nforall x (Solvent(x) and Aroid(x) -> Calculous(x))\nforall x (Calculous(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Disgustful(x) and Calculous(x) -> Neurologic(x))\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Trig(x) -> Disgustful(x))\nforall x (Neurologic(x) and Aroid(x) -> Solvent(x))\nDisgustful(orelee) -> Trig(orelee)\nTrig(kaylyn) and Aroid(kaylyn) -> Calculous(kaylyn)\n\nnot Calculous(kaylyn)\n\nNeurologic(kaylyn) and Aroid(kaylyn) and forall x (Neurologic(x) and Aroid(x) -> Solvent(x)) -> therefore Solvent(kaylyn) Solvent(kaylyn) and Aroid(kaylyn) and forall x (Solvent(x) and Aroid(x) -> Calculous(x)) -> therefore Calculous(kaylyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Pepe is hypodermal. Pepe is wishful. Ardis is hypodermal. Ardis is flowered. Audre is wishful. Nelly is hypodermal. Nelly is ponderous. White, wishful things are ponderous. If something is ponderous and hypodermal then it is biaxial. If something is biaxial then it is vedic. All vedic, biaxial things are flowered. White, wishful things are vedic. If something is flowered and hypodermal then it is ponderous. If Audre is vedic then Audre is wishful. If Ardis is wishful and Ardis is hypodermal then Ardis is biaxial. Pepe is not vedic.", "logic": "\nHypodermal(pepe)\nWishful(pepe)\nHypodermal(ardis)\nFlowered(ardis)\nWishful(audre)\nHypodermal(nelly)\nPonderous(nelly)\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Wishful(x) -> Ponderous(x))\nforall x (Ponderous(x) and Hypodermal(x) -> Biaxial(x))\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Vedic(x))\nforall x (Vedic(x) and Biaxial(x) -> Flowered(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Wishful(x) -> Vedic(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Hypodermal(x) -> Ponderous(x))\nVedic(audre) -> Wishful(audre)\nWishful(ardis) and Hypodermal(ardis) -> Biaxial(ardis)\n\nnot Vedic(pepe)\n\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Vedic(x)) <- forall x (Ponderous(x) and Hypodermal(x) -> Biaxial(x)) <- forall x (Flowered(x) and Wishful(x) -> Ponderous(x)) <- forall x (Vedic(x) and Biaxial(x) -> Flowered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Alexis is carpellate. Alexis is celibate. Magdalena is carpellate. Magdalena is pubertal. Margareta is celibate. Ronalda is carpellate. Ronalda is sculptured. White, celibate things are sculptured. If something is sculptured and carpellate then it is spectral. If something is spectral then it is geographic. All geographic, spectral things are pubertal. White, celibate things are geographic. If something is pubertal and carpellate then it is sculptured. If Margareta is geographic then Margareta is celibate. If Magdalena is celibate and Magdalena is carpellate then Magdalena is spectral. Margareta is sculptured.", "logic": "\nCarpellate(alexis)\nCelibate(alexis)\nCarpellate(magdalena)\nPubertal(magdalena)\nCelibate(margareta)\nCarpellate(ronalda)\nSculptured(ronalda)\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Celibate(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) and Carpellate(x) -> Spectral(x))\nforall x (Spectral(x) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Geographic(x) and Spectral(x) -> Pubertal(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Celibate(x) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Carpellate(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nGeographic(margareta) -> Celibate(margareta)\nCelibate(magdalena) and Carpellate(magdalena) -> Spectral(magdalena)\n\nSculptured(margareta)\n\nforall x (Pubertal(x) and Celibate(x) -> Sculptured(x)) <- forall x (Geographic(x) and Spectral(x) -> Pubertal(x)) <- forall x (Sculptured(x) and Carpellate(x) -> Spectral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Gwenette is reputable. Gwenette is actual. Rosene is reputable. Rosene is managerial. Skye is actual. Phip is reputable. Phip is apodeictic. White, actual things are apodeictic. If something is apodeictic and reputable then it is scalloped. If something is scalloped then it is smoking. All smoking, scalloped things are managerial. White, actual things are smoking. If something is managerial and reputable then it is apodeictic. If Skye is smoking then Skye is actual. If Rosene is actual and Rosene is reputable then Rosene is scalloped. Skye is not smoking.", "logic": "\nReputable(gwenette)\nActual(gwenette)\nReputable(rosene)\nManagerial(rosene)\nActual(skye)\nReputable(phip)\nApodeictic(phip)\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Actual(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) and Reputable(x) -> Scalloped(x))\nforall x (Scalloped(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Smoking(x) and Scalloped(x) -> Managerial(x))\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Actual(x) -> Smoking(x))\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Reputable(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nSmoking(skye) -> Actual(skye)\nActual(rosene) and Reputable(rosene) -> Scalloped(rosene)\n\nnot Smoking(skye)\n\nforall x (Managerial(x) and Actual(x) -> Smoking(x)) <- forall x (Smoking(x) and Scalloped(x) -> Managerial(x)) <- forall x (Apodeictic(x) and Reputable(x) -> Scalloped(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Othilie is roasted. Othilie is gordian. Deana is roasted. Deana is pappose. Lynea is gordian. Nessie is roasted. Nessie is resistant. White, gordian things are resistant. If something is resistant and roasted then it is overfed. If something is overfed then it is genitive. All genitive, overfed things are pappose. White, gordian things are genitive. If something is pappose and roasted then it is resistant. If Lynea is genitive then Lynea is gordian. If Deana is gordian and Deana is roasted then Deana is overfed. Othilie is rough.", "logic": "\nRoasted(othilie)\nGordian(othilie)\nRoasted(deana)\nPappose(deana)\nGordian(lynea)\nRoasted(nessie)\nResistant(nessie)\nforall x (Pappose(x) and Gordian(x) -> Resistant(x))\nforall x (Resistant(x) and Roasted(x) -> Overfed(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) -> Genitive(x))\nforall x (Genitive(x) and Overfed(x) -> Pappose(x))\nforall x (Pappose(x) and Gordian(x) -> Genitive(x))\nforall x (Pappose(x) and Roasted(x) -> Resistant(x))\nGenitive(lynea) -> Gordian(lynea)\nGordian(deana) and Roasted(deana) -> Overfed(deana)\n\nRough(othilie)\n\nRough(othilie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Rodrique is ruttish. Rodrique is vaporish. Kaitlyn is ruttish. Kaitlyn is ovular. Neel is vaporish. Andra is ruttish. Andra is bunchy. White, vaporish things are bunchy. If something is bunchy and ruttish then it is coarse. If something is coarse then it is cleared. All cleared, coarse things are ovular. White, vaporish things are cleared. If something is ovular and ruttish then it is bunchy. If Neel is cleared then Neel is vaporish. If Kaitlyn is vaporish and Kaitlyn is ruttish then Kaitlyn is coarse. Kaitlyn is not rough.", "logic": "\nRuttish(rodrique)\nVaporish(rodrique)\nRuttish(kaitlyn)\nOvular(kaitlyn)\nVaporish(neel)\nRuttish(andra)\nBunchy(andra)\nforall x (Ovular(x) and Vaporish(x) -> Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Bunchy(x) and Ruttish(x) -> Coarse(x))\nforall x (Coarse(x) -> Cleared(x))\nforall x (Cleared(x) and Coarse(x) -> Ovular(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) and Vaporish(x) -> Cleared(x))\nforall x (Ovular(x) and Ruttish(x) -> Bunchy(x))\nCleared(neel) -> Vaporish(neel)\nVaporish(kaitlyn) and Ruttish(kaitlyn) -> Coarse(kaitlyn)\n\nnot Rough(kaitlyn)\n\nnot Rough(kaitlyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Wald is uptown. Wald is viatical. Lyssa is uptown. Lyssa is sorted. Elnar is viatical. Nicolea is uptown. Nicolea is baltic. White, viatical things are baltic. If something is baltic and uptown then it is latin. If something is latin then it is viselike. All viselike, latin things are sorted. White, viatical things are viselike. If something is sorted and uptown then it is baltic. If Elnar is viselike then Elnar is viatical. If Lyssa is viatical and Lyssa is uptown then Lyssa is latin. Elnar is uptown.", "logic": "\nUptown(wald)\nViatical(wald)\nUptown(lyssa)\nSorted(lyssa)\nViatical(elnar)\nUptown(nicolea)\nBaltic(nicolea)\nforall x (Sorted(x) and Viatical(x) -> Baltic(x))\nforall x (Baltic(x) and Uptown(x) -> Latin(x))\nforall x (Latin(x) -> Viselike(x))\nforall x (Viselike(x) and Latin(x) -> Sorted(x))\nforall x (Sorted(x) and Viatical(x) -> Viselike(x))\nforall x (Sorted(x) and Uptown(x) -> Baltic(x))\nViselike(elnar) -> Viatical(elnar)\nViatical(lyssa) and Uptown(lyssa) -> Latin(lyssa)\n\nUptown(elnar)\n\nUptown(elnar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-835"} {"premises": "Josh is not complete. Kizzie is steamed. Tiena is steamed. Graeme is baptized. If Kizzie is senseless and Kizzie is baptized then Kizzie is complete. Furry, acronymous people are dejected. If someone is baptized then they are acronymous. If someone is acronymous then they are complete. All baptized, steamed people are not senseless. If someone is complete then they are senseless. All acronymous people are senseless. If someone is dejected and not chalybeate then they are baptized. Josh is not complete.", "logic": "\nnot Complete(josh)\nSteamed(kizzie)\nSteamed(tiena)\nBaptized(graeme)\nSenseless(kizzie) and Baptized(kizzie) -> Complete(kizzie)\nforall x (Senseless(x) and Acronymous(x) -> Dejected(x))\nforall x (Baptized(x) -> Acronymous(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Complete(x))\nforall x (Baptized(x) and Steamed(x) -> not Senseless(x))\nforall x (Complete(x) -> Senseless(x))\nforall x (Acronymous(x) -> Senseless(x))\nforall x (Dejected(x) and not Chalybeate(x) -> Baptized(x))\n\nnot Complete(josh)\n\ntherefore not Complete(josh)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Odelia is not unctuous. Dinny is panoramic. Aurora is panoramic. Kimbra is invaluable. If Dinny is vestibular and Dinny is invaluable then Dinny is unctuous. Furry, defensive people are severe. If someone is invaluable then they are defensive. If someone is defensive then they are unctuous. All invaluable, panoramic people are not vestibular. If someone is unctuous then they are vestibular. All defensive people are vestibular. If someone is severe and not monodical then they are invaluable. Aurora is not panoramic.", "logic": "\nnot Unctuous(odelia)\nPanoramic(dinny)\nPanoramic(aurora)\nInvaluable(kimbra)\nVestibular(dinny) and Invaluable(dinny) -> Unctuous(dinny)\nforall x (Vestibular(x) and Defensive(x) -> Severe(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Defensive(x))\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Unctuous(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) and Panoramic(x) -> not Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Unctuous(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Defensive(x) -> Vestibular(x))\nforall x (Severe(x) and not Monodical(x) -> Invaluable(x))\n\nnot Panoramic(aurora)\n\ntherefore Panoramic(aurora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Fionnula is not polynomial. Roseanna is conjugal. Mariska is conjugal. Jed is easygoing. If Roseanna is drear and Roseanna is easygoing then Roseanna is polynomial. Furry, benzylic people are glorious. If someone is easygoing then they are benzylic. If someone is benzylic then they are polynomial. All easygoing, conjugal people are not drear. If someone is polynomial then they are drear. All benzylic people are drear. If someone is glorious and not xciv then they are easygoing. Jed is benzylic.", "logic": "\nnot Polynomial(fionnula)\nConjugal(roseanna)\nConjugal(mariska)\nEasygoing(jed)\nDrear(roseanna) and Easygoing(roseanna) -> Polynomial(roseanna)\nforall x (Drear(x) and Benzylic(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Easygoing(x) -> Benzylic(x))\nforall x (Benzylic(x) -> Polynomial(x))\nforall x (Easygoing(x) and Conjugal(x) -> not Drear(x))\nforall x (Polynomial(x) -> Drear(x))\nforall x (Benzylic(x) -> Drear(x))\nforall x (Glorious(x) and not Xciv(x) -> Easygoing(x))\n\nBenzylic(jed)\n\nEasygoing(jed) and forall x (Easygoing(x) -> Benzylic(x)) -> therefore Benzylic(jed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Gaven is not bitchy. Loralee is calumnious. Rona is calumnious. Natala is hominine. If Loralee is coequal and Loralee is hominine then Loralee is bitchy. Furry, attached people are vapourous. If someone is hominine then they are attached. If someone is attached then they are bitchy. All hominine, calumnious people are not coequal. If someone is bitchy then they are coequal. All attached people are coequal. If someone is vapourous and not heavy then they are hominine. Natala is not attached.", "logic": "\nnot Bitchy(gaven)\nCalumnious(loralee)\nCalumnious(rona)\nHominine(natala)\nCoequal(loralee) and Hominine(loralee) -> Bitchy(loralee)\nforall x (Coequal(x) and Attached(x) -> Vapourous(x))\nforall x (Hominine(x) -> Attached(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Hominine(x) and Calumnious(x) -> not Coequal(x))\nforall x (Bitchy(x) -> Coequal(x))\nforall x (Attached(x) -> Coequal(x))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and not Heavy(x) -> Hominine(x))\n\nnot Attached(natala)\n\nHominine(natala) and forall x (Hominine(x) -> Attached(x)) -> therefore Attached(natala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Clotilda is not searching. Eric is nerveless. Gibb is nerveless. Lynnea is rugged. If Eric is neonatal and Eric is rugged then Eric is searching. Furry, canadian people are narial. If someone is rugged then they are canadian. If someone is canadian then they are searching. All rugged, nerveless people are not neonatal. If someone is searching then they are neonatal. All canadian people are neonatal. If someone is narial and not saxicoline then they are rugged. Lynnea is searching.", "logic": "\nnot Searching(clotilda)\nNerveless(eric)\nNerveless(gibb)\nRugged(lynnea)\nNeonatal(eric) and Rugged(eric) -> Searching(eric)\nforall x (Neonatal(x) and Canadian(x) -> Narial(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) -> Canadian(x))\nforall x (Canadian(x) -> Searching(x))\nforall x (Rugged(x) and Nerveless(x) -> not Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Searching(x) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Canadian(x) -> Neonatal(x))\nforall x (Narial(x) and not Saxicoline(x) -> Rugged(x))\n\nSearching(lynnea)\n\nRugged(lynnea) and forall x (Rugged(x) -> Canadian(x)) -> therefore Canadian(lynnea) Canadian(lynnea) and forall x (Canadian(x) -> Searching(x)) -> therefore Searching(lynnea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Malanie is not pennate. Ibbie is demagogic. Zeke is demagogic. Milly is copulatory. If Ibbie is mannerly and Ibbie is copulatory then Ibbie is pennate. Furry, excellent people are methylated. If someone is copulatory then they are excellent. If someone is excellent then they are pennate. All copulatory, demagogic people are not mannerly. If someone is pennate then they are mannerly. All excellent people are mannerly. If someone is methylated and not monosemous then they are copulatory. Milly is not pennate.", "logic": "\nnot Pennate(malanie)\nDemagogic(ibbie)\nDemagogic(zeke)\nCopulatory(milly)\nMannerly(ibbie) and Copulatory(ibbie) -> Pennate(ibbie)\nforall x (Mannerly(x) and Excellent(x) -> Methylated(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) -> Excellent(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Pennate(x))\nforall x (Copulatory(x) and Demagogic(x) -> not Mannerly(x))\nforall x (Pennate(x) -> Mannerly(x))\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Mannerly(x))\nforall x (Methylated(x) and not Monosemous(x) -> Copulatory(x))\n\nnot Pennate(milly)\n\nCopulatory(milly) and forall x (Copulatory(x) -> Excellent(x)) -> therefore Excellent(milly) Excellent(milly) and forall x (Excellent(x) -> Pennate(x)) -> therefore Pennate(milly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Dedie is not modernised. Adena is volunteer. Rusty is volunteer. Emalee is reasoning. If Adena is squalling and Adena is reasoning then Adena is modernised. Furry, polyphonic people are admittable. If someone is reasoning then they are polyphonic. If someone is polyphonic then they are modernised. All reasoning, volunteer people are not squalling. If someone is modernised then they are squalling. All polyphonic people are squalling. If someone is admittable and not fizzy then they are reasoning. Emalee is admittable.", "logic": "\nnot Modernised(dedie)\nVolunteer(adena)\nVolunteer(rusty)\nReasoning(emalee)\nSqualling(adena) and Reasoning(adena) -> Modernised(adena)\nforall x (Squalling(x) and Polyphonic(x) -> Admittable(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\nforall x (Polyphonic(x) -> Modernised(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) and Volunteer(x) -> not Squalling(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Polyphonic(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Admittable(x) and not Fizzy(x) -> Reasoning(x))\n\nAdmittable(emalee)\n\nReasoning(emalee) and forall x (Reasoning(x) -> Polyphonic(x)) -> therefore Polyphonic(emalee) Polyphonic(emalee) and forall x (Polyphonic(x) -> Squalling(x)) -> therefore Squalling(emalee) Reasoning(emalee) and forall x (Reasoning(x) -> Polyphonic(x)) -> therefore Polyphonic(emalee) Squalling(emalee) and Polyphonic(emalee) and forall x (Squalling(x) and Polyphonic(x) -> Admittable(x)) -> therefore Admittable(emalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Sukey is not nourished. Gustie is shelvy. Kissie is shelvy. Joby is eristical. If Gustie is pantheist and Gustie is eristical then Gustie is nourished. Furry, zambian people are artistic. If someone is eristical then they are zambian. If someone is zambian then they are nourished. All eristical, shelvy people are not pantheist. If someone is nourished then they are pantheist. All zambian people are pantheist. If someone is artistic and not phonemic then they are eristical. Joby is not artistic.", "logic": "\nnot Nourished(sukey)\nShelvy(gustie)\nShelvy(kissie)\nEristical(joby)\nPantheist(gustie) and Eristical(gustie) -> Nourished(gustie)\nforall x (Pantheist(x) and Zambian(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Eristical(x) -> Zambian(x))\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Nourished(x))\nforall x (Eristical(x) and Shelvy(x) -> not Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Nourished(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Zambian(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Artistic(x) and not Phonemic(x) -> Eristical(x))\n\nnot Artistic(joby)\n\nEristical(joby) and forall x (Eristical(x) -> Zambian(x)) -> therefore Zambian(joby) Zambian(joby) and forall x (Zambian(x) -> Pantheist(x)) -> therefore Pantheist(joby) Eristical(joby) and forall x (Eristical(x) -> Zambian(x)) -> therefore Zambian(joby) Pantheist(joby) and Zambian(joby) and forall x (Pantheist(x) and Zambian(x) -> Artistic(x)) -> therefore Artistic(joby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Gallagher is not polish. Tabor is bromic. Marion is bromic. Nora is vulpine. If Tabor is virtuoso and Tabor is vulpine then Tabor is polish. Furry, microbial people are dissolute. If someone is vulpine then they are microbial. If someone is microbial then they are polish. All vulpine, bromic people are not virtuoso. If someone is polish then they are virtuoso. All microbial people are virtuoso. If someone is dissolute and not nicaean then they are vulpine. Marion is not polish.", "logic": "\nnot Polish(gallagher)\nBromic(tabor)\nBromic(marion)\nVulpine(nora)\nVirtuoso(tabor) and Vulpine(tabor) -> Polish(tabor)\nforall x (Virtuoso(x) and Microbial(x) -> Dissolute(x))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) -> Microbial(x))\nforall x (Microbial(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) and Bromic(x) -> not Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Polish(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Microbial(x) -> Virtuoso(x))\nforall x (Dissolute(x) and not Nicaean(x) -> Vulpine(x))\n\nnot Polish(marion)\n\nforall x (Microbial(x) -> Polish(x)) <- forall x (Vulpine(x) -> Microbial(x)) <- forall x (Dissolute(x) and not Nicaean(x) -> Vulpine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Chadd is not subdued. Blanche is sclerotic. Delphine is sclerotic. Kirbee is numerate. If Blanche is maudlin and Blanche is numerate then Blanche is subdued. Furry, praetorial people are nautical. If someone is numerate then they are praetorial. If someone is praetorial then they are subdued. All numerate, sclerotic people are not maudlin. If someone is subdued then they are maudlin. All praetorial people are maudlin. If someone is nautical and not initiative then they are numerate. Blanche is numerate.", "logic": "\nnot Subdued(chadd)\nSclerotic(blanche)\nSclerotic(delphine)\nNumerate(kirbee)\nMaudlin(blanche) and Numerate(blanche) -> Subdued(blanche)\nforall x (Maudlin(x) and Praetorial(x) -> Nautical(x))\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> Praetorial(x))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) -> Subdued(x))\nforall x (Numerate(x) and Sclerotic(x) -> not Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Praetorial(x) -> Maudlin(x))\nforall x (Nautical(x) and not Initiative(x) -> Numerate(x))\n\nNumerate(blanche)\n\nforall x (Nautical(x) and not Initiative(x) -> Numerate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Finn is not joint. Norry is aggravated. Corry is aggravated. Valene is cheeselike. If Norry is splashed and Norry is cheeselike then Norry is joint. Furry, lxiv people are disclosed. If someone is cheeselike then they are lxiv. If someone is lxiv then they are joint. All cheeselike, aggravated people are not splashed. If someone is joint then they are splashed. All lxiv people are splashed. If someone is disclosed and not slippery then they are cheeselike. Corry is not splashed.", "logic": "\nnot Joint(finn)\nAggravated(norry)\nAggravated(corry)\nCheeselike(valene)\nSplashed(norry) and Cheeselike(norry) -> Joint(norry)\nforall x (Splashed(x) and Lxiv(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Cheeselike(x) -> Lxiv(x))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) -> Joint(x))\nforall x (Cheeselike(x) and Aggravated(x) -> not Splashed(x))\nforall x (Joint(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) -> Splashed(x))\nforall x (Disclosed(x) and not Slippery(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\n\nnot Splashed(corry)\n\nforall x (Joint(x) -> Splashed(x)) <- forall x (Lxiv(x) -> Joint(x)) <- forall x (Cheeselike(x) -> Lxiv(x)) <- forall x (Disclosed(x) and not Slippery(x) -> Cheeselike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Alfreda is not bifoliate. Katha is carefree. Darda is carefree. Dorothee is hurt. If Katha is deictic and Katha is hurt then Katha is bifoliate. Furry, getable people are oleophobic. If someone is hurt then they are getable. If someone is getable then they are bifoliate. All hurt, carefree people are not deictic. If someone is bifoliate then they are deictic. All getable people are deictic. If someone is oleophobic and not aeschylean then they are hurt. Katha is oleophobic.", "logic": "\nnot Bifoliate(alfreda)\nCarefree(katha)\nCarefree(darda)\nHurt(dorothee)\nDeictic(katha) and Hurt(katha) -> Bifoliate(katha)\nforall x (Deictic(x) and Getable(x) -> Oleophobic(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) -> Getable(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Hurt(x) and Carefree(x) -> not Deictic(x))\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> Deictic(x))\nforall x (Oleophobic(x) and not Aeschylean(x) -> Hurt(x))\n\nOleophobic(katha)\n\nforall x (Deictic(x) and Getable(x) -> Oleophobic(x)) <- forall x (Hurt(x) -> Getable(x)) <- forall x (Oleophobic(x) and not Aeschylean(x) -> Hurt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Nettle is not awaited. Chryste is delirious. Lonee is delirious. Abe is untapped. If Chryste is coinciding and Chryste is untapped then Chryste is awaited. Furry, spermatic people are vexatious. If someone is untapped then they are spermatic. If someone is spermatic then they are awaited. All untapped, delirious people are not coinciding. If someone is awaited then they are coinciding. All spermatic people are coinciding. If someone is vexatious and not sore then they are untapped. Abe is not delirious.", "logic": "\nnot Awaited(nettle)\nDelirious(chryste)\nDelirious(lonee)\nUntapped(abe)\nCoinciding(chryste) and Untapped(chryste) -> Awaited(chryste)\nforall x (Coinciding(x) and Spermatic(x) -> Vexatious(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) -> Spermatic(x))\nforall x (Spermatic(x) -> Awaited(x))\nforall x (Untapped(x) and Delirious(x) -> not Coinciding(x))\nforall x (Awaited(x) -> Coinciding(x))\nforall x (Spermatic(x) -> Coinciding(x))\nforall x (Vexatious(x) and not Sore(x) -> Untapped(x))\n\nnot Delirious(abe)\n\nnot Delirious(abe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Deena is not inmost. Kori is carbonous. Bela is carbonous. Tomasina is scrivened. If Kori is miffed and Kori is scrivened then Kori is inmost. Furry, avian people are godlike. If someone is scrivened then they are avian. If someone is avian then they are inmost. All scrivened, carbonous people are not miffed. If someone is inmost then they are miffed. All avian people are miffed. If someone is godlike and not perversive then they are scrivened. Tomasina is perversive.", "logic": "\nnot Inmost(deena)\nCarbonous(kori)\nCarbonous(bela)\nScrivened(tomasina)\nMiffed(kori) and Scrivened(kori) -> Inmost(kori)\nforall x (Miffed(x) and Avian(x) -> Godlike(x))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) -> Avian(x))\nforall x (Avian(x) -> Inmost(x))\nforall x (Scrivened(x) and Carbonous(x) -> not Miffed(x))\nforall x (Inmost(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Avian(x) -> Miffed(x))\nforall x (Godlike(x) and not Perversive(x) -> Scrivened(x))\n\nPerversive(tomasina)\n\nPerversive(tomasina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Lillian is not unexcused. Mohammad is squashy. Blancha is squashy. Allen is scoreless. If Mohammad is bowery and Mohammad is scoreless then Mohammad is unexcused. Furry, loverlike people are millionth. If someone is scoreless then they are loverlike. If someone is loverlike then they are unexcused. All scoreless, squashy people are not bowery. If someone is unexcused then they are bowery. All loverlike people are bowery. If someone is millionth and not refulgent then they are scoreless. Lillian is not refulgent.", "logic": "\nnot Unexcused(lillian)\nSquashy(mohammad)\nSquashy(blancha)\nScoreless(allen)\nBowery(mohammad) and Scoreless(mohammad) -> Unexcused(mohammad)\nforall x (Bowery(x) and Loverlike(x) -> Millionth(x))\nforall x (Scoreless(x) -> Loverlike(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Scoreless(x) and Squashy(x) -> not Bowery(x))\nforall x (Unexcused(x) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Loverlike(x) -> Bowery(x))\nforall x (Millionth(x) and not Refulgent(x) -> Scoreless(x))\n\nnot Refulgent(lillian)\n\nnot Refulgent(lillian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "Merrill is not retarded. Zara is barren. Gera is barren. Hayden is trig. If Zara is ungarbed and Zara is trig then Zara is retarded. Furry, diestrous people are done. If someone is trig then they are diestrous. If someone is diestrous then they are retarded. All trig, barren people are not ungarbed. If someone is retarded then they are ungarbed. All diestrous people are ungarbed. If someone is done and not dural then they are trig. Zara is dural.", "logic": "\nnot Retarded(merrill)\nBarren(zara)\nBarren(gera)\nTrig(hayden)\nUngarbed(zara) and Trig(zara) -> Retarded(zara)\nforall x (Ungarbed(x) and Diestrous(x) -> Done(x))\nforall x (Trig(x) -> Diestrous(x))\nforall x (Diestrous(x) -> Retarded(x))\nforall x (Trig(x) and Barren(x) -> not Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Retarded(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Diestrous(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Done(x) and not Dural(x) -> Trig(x))\n\nDural(zara)\n\nDural(zara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-544"} {"premises": "The jephthah is excusable. The jephthah is bordered. The jephthah is perennial. The jephthah is outlying. The jephthah is daily. If something is outlying then it is bordered. If the jephthah is bordered then the jephthah is daily. If something is outlying then it is excusable. If something is daily and not outlying then it is excusable. If something is daily and outlying then it is excusable. Cold things are perennial. If something is excusable and not outlying then it is perennial. If something is excusable and not bordered then it is daily. The jephthah is daily.", "logic": "\nExcusable(jephthah)\nBordered(jephthah)\nPerennial(jephthah)\nOutlying(jephthah)\nDaily(jephthah)\nforall x (Outlying(x) -> Bordered(x))\nBordered(jephthah) -> Daily(jephthah)\nforall x (Outlying(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Daily(x) and not Outlying(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Daily(x) and Outlying(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Bordered(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Excusable(x) and not Outlying(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Excusable(x) and not Bordered(x) -> Daily(x))\n\nDaily(jephthah)\n\ntherefore Daily(jephthah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2523"} {"premises": "The ester is plumose. The ester is subsidised. The ester is reparable. The ester is anaphoric. The ester is crenulate. If something is anaphoric then it is subsidised. If the ester is subsidised then the ester is crenulate. If something is anaphoric then it is plumose. If something is crenulate and not anaphoric then it is plumose. If something is crenulate and anaphoric then it is plumose. Cold things are reparable. If something is plumose and not anaphoric then it is reparable. If something is plumose and not subsidised then it is crenulate. The ester is not reparable.", "logic": "\nPlumose(ester)\nSubsidised(ester)\nReparable(ester)\nAnaphoric(ester)\nCrenulate(ester)\nforall x (Anaphoric(x) -> Subsidised(x))\nSubsidised(ester) -> Crenulate(ester)\nforall x (Anaphoric(x) -> Plumose(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) and not Anaphoric(x) -> Plumose(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) and Anaphoric(x) -> Plumose(x))\nforall x (Subsidised(x) -> Reparable(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and not Anaphoric(x) -> Reparable(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and not Subsidised(x) -> Crenulate(x))\n\nnot Reparable(ester)\n\ntherefore Reparable(ester)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2523"} {"premises": "The ilyse is historical. The ilyse is unmatched. The ilyse is chlorotic. The ilyse is shuttered. The ilyse is offbeat. If something is shuttered then it is unmatched. If the ilyse is unmatched then the ilyse is offbeat. If something is shuttered then it is historical. If something is offbeat and not shuttered then it is historical. If something is offbeat and shuttered then it is historical. Cold things are chlorotic. If something is historical and not shuttered then it is chlorotic. If something is historical and not unmatched then it is offbeat. The ilyse does not see the ilyse.", "logic": "\nHistorical(ilyse)\nUnmatched(ilyse)\nChlorotic(ilyse)\nShuttered(ilyse)\nOffbeat(ilyse)\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Unmatched(x))\nUnmatched(ilyse) -> Offbeat(ilyse)\nforall x (Shuttered(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) and not Shuttered(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Offbeat(x) and Shuttered(x) -> Historical(x))\nforall x (Unmatched(x) -> Chlorotic(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) and not Shuttered(x) -> Chlorotic(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) and not Unmatched(x) -> Offbeat(x))\n\nnot Sees(ilyse, ilyse)\n\nnot Sees(ilyse, ilyse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2523"} {"premises": "The florentia is flowery. The florentia is sized. The florentia is lemony. The florentia is sore. The florentia is reachable. If something is sore then it is sized. If the florentia is sized then the florentia is reachable. If something is sore then it is flowery. If something is reachable and not sore then it is flowery. If something is reachable and sore then it is flowery. Cold things are lemony. If something is flowery and not sore then it is lemony. If something is flowery and not sized then it is reachable. The florentia likes the florentia.", "logic": "\nFlowery(florentia)\nSized(florentia)\nLemony(florentia)\nSore(florentia)\nReachable(florentia)\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Sized(x))\nSized(florentia) -> Reachable(florentia)\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Flowery(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) and not Sore(x) -> Flowery(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) and Sore(x) -> Flowery(x))\nforall x (Sized(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Flowery(x) and not Sore(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Flowery(x) and not Sized(x) -> Reachable(x))\n\nLikes(florentia, florentia)\n\nLikes(florentia, florentia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2523"} {"premises": "The taddeo is panicled. The taddeo mythicise the arlinda. The taddeo sigh the arlinda. The zorro delimitate the arlinda. The zorro is succulent. The arlinda delimitate the shandra. The arlinda is illiberal. The arlinda sigh the shandra. The shandra delimitate the arlinda. The shandra is operose. If something delimitate the taddeo then the taddeo is upcoming. If something is illiberal and it delimitate the shandra then it mythicise the shandra. If something is upcoming and it delimitate the arlinda then it is operose. If something sigh the shandra then the shandra is succulent. If the taddeo is upcoming then the taddeo mythicise the zorro. If something is illiberal and it delimitate the taddeo then it sigh the shandra. The zorro is succulent.", "logic": "\nPanicled(taddeo)\nMythicise(taddeo, arlinda)\nSigh(taddeo, arlinda)\nDelimitate(zorro, arlinda)\nSucculent(zorro)\nDelimitate(arlinda, shandra)\nIlliberal(arlinda)\nSigh(arlinda, shandra)\nDelimitate(shandra, arlinda)\nOperose(shandra)\nforall x (Delimitate(x, taddeo) -> Upcoming(taddeo))\nforall x (Illiberal(x) and Delimitate(x, shandra) -> Mythicise(x, shandra))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and Delimitate(x, arlinda) -> Operose(x))\nforall x (Sigh(x, shandra) -> Succulent(shandra))\nUpcoming(taddeo) -> Mythicise(taddeo, zorro)\nforall x (Illiberal(x) and Delimitate(x, taddeo) -> Sigh(x, shandra))\n\nSucculent(zorro)\n\ntherefore Succulent(zorro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4842"} {"premises": "The roz is octal. The roz unbuckle the danita. The roz bribe the danita. The jermaine jumble the danita. The jermaine is disjoint. The danita jumble the price. The danita is sandpapery. The danita bribe the price. The price jumble the danita. The price is taxing. If something jumble the roz then the roz is undraped. If something is sandpapery and it jumble the price then it unbuckle the price. If something is undraped and it jumble the danita then it is taxing. If something bribe the price then the price is disjoint. If the roz is undraped then the roz unbuckle the jermaine. If something is sandpapery and it jumble the roz then it bribe the price. The roz does not see the danita.", "logic": "\nOctal(roz)\nUnbuckle(roz, danita)\nBribe(roz, danita)\nJumble(jermaine, danita)\nDisjoint(jermaine)\nJumble(danita, price)\nSandpapery(danita)\nBribe(danita, price)\nJumble(price, danita)\nTaxing(price)\nforall x (Jumble(x, roz) -> Undraped(roz))\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Jumble(x, price) -> Unbuckle(x, price))\nforall x (Undraped(x) and Jumble(x, danita) -> Taxing(x))\nforall x (Bribe(x, price) -> Disjoint(price))\nUndraped(roz) -> Unbuckle(roz, jermaine)\nforall x (Sandpapery(x) and Jumble(x, roz) -> Bribe(x, price))\n\nnot Unbuckle(roz, danita)\n\ntherefore Unbuckle(roz, danita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4842"} {"premises": "The tedmund is redbrick. The tedmund realine the milly. The tedmund underrate the milly. The magnus fart the milly. The magnus is scalelike. The milly fart the amalee. The milly is uncouth. The milly underrate the amalee. The amalee fart the milly. The amalee is indecisive. If something fart the tedmund then the tedmund is parabolic. If something is uncouth and it fart the amalee then it realine the amalee. If something is parabolic and it fart the milly then it is indecisive. If something underrate the amalee then the amalee is scalelike. If the tedmund is parabolic then the tedmund realine the magnus. If something is uncouth and it fart the tedmund then it underrate the amalee. The tedmund is not indecisive.", "logic": "\nRedbrick(tedmund)\nRealine(tedmund, milly)\nUnderrate(tedmund, milly)\nFart(magnus, milly)\nScalelike(magnus)\nFart(milly, amalee)\nUncouth(milly)\nUnderrate(milly, amalee)\nFart(amalee, milly)\nIndecisive(amalee)\nforall x (Fart(x, tedmund) -> Parabolic(tedmund))\nforall x (Uncouth(x) and Fart(x, amalee) -> Realine(x, amalee))\nforall x (Parabolic(x) and Fart(x, milly) -> Indecisive(x))\nforall x (Underrate(x, amalee) -> Scalelike(amalee))\nParabolic(tedmund) -> Realine(tedmund, magnus)\nforall x (Uncouth(x) and Fart(x, tedmund) -> Underrate(x, amalee))\n\nnot Indecisive(tedmund)\n\nforall x (Parabolic(x) and Fart(x, milly) -> Indecisive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4842"} {"premises": "The weber is starred. The weber culture the anallese. The weber detain the anallese. The karna undercut the anallese. The karna is fretted. The anallese undercut the suzy. The anallese is tawdry. The anallese detain the suzy. The suzy undercut the anallese. The suzy is lonesome. If something undercut the weber then the weber is idyllic. If something is tawdry and it undercut the suzy then it culture the suzy. If something is idyllic and it undercut the anallese then it is lonesome. If something detain the suzy then the suzy is fretted. If the weber is idyllic then the weber culture the karna. If something is tawdry and it undercut the weber then it detain the suzy. The suzy undercut the weber.", "logic": "\nStarred(weber)\nCulture(weber, anallese)\nDetain(weber, anallese)\nUndercut(karna, anallese)\nFretted(karna)\nUndercut(anallese, suzy)\nTawdry(anallese)\nDetain(anallese, suzy)\nUndercut(suzy, anallese)\nLonesome(suzy)\nforall x (Undercut(x, weber) -> Idyllic(weber))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) and Undercut(x, suzy) -> Culture(x, suzy))\nforall x (Idyllic(x) and Undercut(x, anallese) -> Lonesome(x))\nforall x (Detain(x, suzy) -> Fretted(suzy))\nIdyllic(weber) -> Culture(weber, karna)\nforall x (Tawdry(x) and Undercut(x, weber) -> Detain(x, suzy))\n\nUndercut(suzy, weber)\n\nUndercut(suzy, weber) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4842"} {"premises": "The dorise address the jacquelyn. The goldi acetylise the dorise. The angy reconfirm the dorise. The jacquelyn is frivolous. If someone reconfirm the dorise then they see the jacquelyn. If someone address the angy then the angy is pigheaded. If someone is pigheaded and they see the goldi then the goldi is carinated. If someone address the dorise then the dorise address the goldi. If someone reconfirm the jacquelyn and the jacquelyn address the goldi then the goldi address the dorise. If someone acetylise the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn is national. If someone is national then they eat the jacquelyn. If someone reconfirm the goldi and they like the dorise then they are national. The dorise address the jacquelyn.", "logic": "\nAddress(dorise, jacquelyn)\nAcetylise(goldi, dorise)\nReconfirm(angy, dorise)\nFrivolous(jacquelyn)\nforall x (Reconfirm(x, dorise) -> Acetylise(x, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Address(x, angy) -> Pigheaded(angy))\nforall x (Pigheaded(x) and Acetylise(x, goldi) -> Carinated(goldi))\nforall x (Address(x, dorise) -> Address(dorise, goldi))\nforall x (Reconfirm(x, jacquelyn) and Address(jacquelyn, goldi) -> Address(goldi, dorise))\nforall x (Acetylise(x, jacquelyn) -> National(jacquelyn))\nforall x (National(x) -> Address(x, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Reconfirm(x, goldi) and Reconfirm(x, dorise) -> National(x))\n\nAddress(dorise, jacquelyn)\n\ntherefore Address(dorise, jacquelyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The sheffie yawn the lura. The lida near the sheffie. The ramon summarise the sheffie. The lura is angry. If someone summarise the sheffie then they see the lura. If someone yawn the ramon then the ramon is astragalar. If someone is astragalar and they see the lida then the lida is atavistic. If someone yawn the sheffie then the sheffie yawn the lida. If someone summarise the lura and the lura yawn the lida then the lida yawn the sheffie. If someone near the lura then the lura is bacterioid. If someone is bacterioid then they eat the lura. If someone summarise the lida and they like the sheffie then they are bacterioid. The sheffie does not eat the lura.", "logic": "\nYawn(sheffie, lura)\nNear(lida, sheffie)\nSummarise(ramon, sheffie)\nAngry(lura)\nforall x (Summarise(x, sheffie) -> Near(x, lura))\nforall x (Yawn(x, ramon) -> Astragalar(ramon))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) and Near(x, lida) -> Atavistic(lida))\nforall x (Yawn(x, sheffie) -> Yawn(sheffie, lida))\nforall x (Summarise(x, lura) and Yawn(lura, lida) -> Yawn(lida, sheffie))\nforall x (Near(x, lura) -> Bacterioid(lura))\nforall x (Bacterioid(x) -> Yawn(x, lura))\nforall x (Summarise(x, lida) and Summarise(x, sheffie) -> Bacterioid(x))\n\nnot Yawn(sheffie, lura)\n\ntherefore Yawn(sheffie, lura)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The ebenezer powerwash the nola. The chalmers assert the ebenezer. The rayshell predecease the ebenezer. The nola is pandurate. If someone predecease the ebenezer then they see the nola. If someone powerwash the rayshell then the rayshell is heathen. If someone is heathen and they see the chalmers then the chalmers is dying. If someone powerwash the ebenezer then the ebenezer powerwash the chalmers. If someone predecease the nola and the nola powerwash the chalmers then the chalmers powerwash the ebenezer. If someone assert the nola then the nola is rheumatoid. If someone is rheumatoid then they eat the nola. If someone predecease the chalmers and they like the ebenezer then they are rheumatoid. The rayshell assert the nola.", "logic": "\nPowerwash(ebenezer, nola)\nAssert(chalmers, ebenezer)\nPredecease(rayshell, ebenezer)\nPandurate(nola)\nforall x (Predecease(x, ebenezer) -> Assert(x, nola))\nforall x (Powerwash(x, rayshell) -> Heathen(rayshell))\nforall x (Heathen(x) and Assert(x, chalmers) -> Dying(chalmers))\nforall x (Powerwash(x, ebenezer) -> Powerwash(ebenezer, chalmers))\nforall x (Predecease(x, nola) and Powerwash(nola, chalmers) -> Powerwash(chalmers, ebenezer))\nforall x (Assert(x, nola) -> Rheumatoid(nola))\nforall x (Rheumatoid(x) -> Powerwash(x, nola))\nforall x (Predecease(x, chalmers) and Predecease(x, ebenezer) -> Rheumatoid(x))\n\nAssert(rayshell, nola)\n\nPredecease(rayshell, ebenezer) and forall x (Predecease(x, ebenezer) -> Assert(x, nola)) -> therefore Assert(rayshell, nola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The mariele consociate the vina. The selby ankylose the mariele. The tally safeguard the mariele. The vina is moderato. If someone safeguard the mariele then they see the vina. If someone consociate the tally then the tally is adaxial. If someone is adaxial and they see the selby then the selby is burbly. If someone consociate the mariele then the mariele consociate the selby. If someone safeguard the vina and the vina consociate the selby then the selby consociate the mariele. If someone ankylose the vina then the vina is excellent. If someone is excellent then they eat the vina. If someone safeguard the selby and they like the mariele then they are excellent. The tally does not see the vina.", "logic": "\nConsociate(mariele, vina)\nAnkylose(selby, mariele)\nSafeguard(tally, mariele)\nModerato(vina)\nforall x (Safeguard(x, mariele) -> Ankylose(x, vina))\nforall x (Consociate(x, tally) -> Adaxial(tally))\nforall x (Adaxial(x) and Ankylose(x, selby) -> Burbly(selby))\nforall x (Consociate(x, mariele) -> Consociate(mariele, selby))\nforall x (Safeguard(x, vina) and Consociate(vina, selby) -> Consociate(selby, mariele))\nforall x (Ankylose(x, vina) -> Excellent(vina))\nforall x (Excellent(x) -> Consociate(x, vina))\nforall x (Safeguard(x, selby) and Safeguard(x, mariele) -> Excellent(x))\n\nnot Ankylose(tally, vina)\n\nSafeguard(tally, mariele) and forall x (Safeguard(x, mariele) -> Ankylose(x, vina)) -> therefore Ankylose(tally, vina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The gerty peak the zonda. The mirabelle brattle the gerty. The franni reiterate the gerty. The zonda is strident. If someone reiterate the gerty then they see the zonda. If someone peak the franni then the franni is rummy. If someone is rummy and they see the mirabelle then the mirabelle is boskopoid. If someone peak the gerty then the gerty peak the mirabelle. If someone reiterate the zonda and the zonda peak the mirabelle then the mirabelle peak the gerty. If someone brattle the zonda then the zonda is endemic. If someone is endemic then they eat the zonda. If someone reiterate the mirabelle and they like the gerty then they are endemic. The zonda is endemic.", "logic": "\nPeak(gerty, zonda)\nBrattle(mirabelle, gerty)\nReiterate(franni, gerty)\nStrident(zonda)\nforall x (Reiterate(x, gerty) -> Brattle(x, zonda))\nforall x (Peak(x, franni) -> Rummy(franni))\nforall x (Rummy(x) and Brattle(x, mirabelle) -> Boskopoid(mirabelle))\nforall x (Peak(x, gerty) -> Peak(gerty, mirabelle))\nforall x (Reiterate(x, zonda) and Peak(zonda, mirabelle) -> Peak(mirabelle, gerty))\nforall x (Brattle(x, zonda) -> Endemic(zonda))\nforall x (Endemic(x) -> Peak(x, zonda))\nforall x (Reiterate(x, mirabelle) and Reiterate(x, gerty) -> Endemic(x))\n\nEndemic(zonda)\n\nReiterate(franni, gerty) and forall x (Reiterate(x, gerty) -> Brattle(x, zonda)) -> therefore Brattle(franni, zonda) Brattle(franni, zonda) and forall x (Brattle(x, zonda) -> Endemic(zonda)) -> therefore Endemic(zonda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The mei trot the neddie. The worthy remarry the mei. The catlee cuckoo the mei. The neddie is maritime. If someone cuckoo the mei then they see the neddie. If someone trot the catlee then the catlee is south. If someone is south and they see the worthy then the worthy is assistive. If someone trot the mei then the mei trot the worthy. If someone cuckoo the neddie and the neddie trot the worthy then the worthy trot the mei. If someone remarry the neddie then the neddie is pedantic. If someone is pedantic then they eat the neddie. If someone cuckoo the worthy and they like the mei then they are pedantic. The neddie is not pedantic.", "logic": "\nTrot(mei, neddie)\nRemarry(worthy, mei)\nCuckoo(catlee, mei)\nMaritime(neddie)\nforall x (Cuckoo(x, mei) -> Remarry(x, neddie))\nforall x (Trot(x, catlee) -> South(catlee))\nforall x (South(x) and Remarry(x, worthy) -> Assistive(worthy))\nforall x (Trot(x, mei) -> Trot(mei, worthy))\nforall x (Cuckoo(x, neddie) and Trot(neddie, worthy) -> Trot(worthy, mei))\nforall x (Remarry(x, neddie) -> Pedantic(neddie))\nforall x (Pedantic(x) -> Trot(x, neddie))\nforall x (Cuckoo(x, worthy) and Cuckoo(x, mei) -> Pedantic(x))\n\nnot Pedantic(neddie)\n\nCuckoo(catlee, mei) and forall x (Cuckoo(x, mei) -> Remarry(x, neddie)) -> therefore Remarry(catlee, neddie) Remarry(catlee, neddie) and forall x (Remarry(x, neddie) -> Pedantic(neddie)) -> therefore Pedantic(neddie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The doria desalinize the mufinella. The nidia brutalize the doria. The ofilia transit the doria. The mufinella is excused. If someone transit the doria then they see the mufinella. If someone desalinize the ofilia then the ofilia is renascent. If someone is renascent and they see the nidia then the nidia is unimodal. If someone desalinize the doria then the doria desalinize the nidia. If someone transit the mufinella and the mufinella desalinize the nidia then the nidia desalinize the doria. If someone brutalize the mufinella then the mufinella is unplanned. If someone is unplanned then they eat the mufinella. If someone transit the nidia and they like the doria then they are unplanned. The mufinella desalinize the mufinella.", "logic": "\nDesalinize(doria, mufinella)\nBrutalize(nidia, doria)\nTransit(ofilia, doria)\nExcused(mufinella)\nforall x (Transit(x, doria) -> Brutalize(x, mufinella))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, ofilia) -> Renascent(ofilia))\nforall x (Renascent(x) and Brutalize(x, nidia) -> Unimodal(nidia))\nforall x (Desalinize(x, doria) -> Desalinize(doria, nidia))\nforall x (Transit(x, mufinella) and Desalinize(mufinella, nidia) -> Desalinize(nidia, doria))\nforall x (Brutalize(x, mufinella) -> Unplanned(mufinella))\nforall x (Unplanned(x) -> Desalinize(x, mufinella))\nforall x (Transit(x, nidia) and Transit(x, doria) -> Unplanned(x))\n\nDesalinize(mufinella, mufinella)\n\nTransit(ofilia, doria) and forall x (Transit(x, doria) -> Brutalize(x, mufinella)) -> therefore Brutalize(ofilia, mufinella) Brutalize(ofilia, mufinella) and forall x (Brutalize(x, mufinella) -> Unplanned(mufinella)) -> therefore Unplanned(mufinella) Unplanned(mufinella) and forall x (Unplanned(x) -> Desalinize(x, mufinella)) -> therefore Desalinize(mufinella, mufinella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The blinny redecorate the rudiger. The andromeda chiromance the blinny. The elbertina centre the blinny. The rudiger is tripartite. If someone centre the blinny then they see the rudiger. If someone redecorate the elbertina then the elbertina is eldest. If someone is eldest and they see the andromeda then the andromeda is nonpolar. If someone redecorate the blinny then the blinny redecorate the andromeda. If someone centre the rudiger and the rudiger redecorate the andromeda then the andromeda redecorate the blinny. If someone chiromance the rudiger then the rudiger is tenth. If someone is tenth then they eat the rudiger. If someone centre the andromeda and they like the blinny then they are tenth. The rudiger does not eat the rudiger.", "logic": "\nRedecorate(blinny, rudiger)\nChiromance(andromeda, blinny)\nCentre(elbertina, blinny)\nTripartite(rudiger)\nforall x (Centre(x, blinny) -> Chiromance(x, rudiger))\nforall x (Redecorate(x, elbertina) -> Eldest(elbertina))\nforall x (Eldest(x) and Chiromance(x, andromeda) -> Nonpolar(andromeda))\nforall x (Redecorate(x, blinny) -> Redecorate(blinny, andromeda))\nforall x (Centre(x, rudiger) and Redecorate(rudiger, andromeda) -> Redecorate(andromeda, blinny))\nforall x (Chiromance(x, rudiger) -> Tenth(rudiger))\nforall x (Tenth(x) -> Redecorate(x, rudiger))\nforall x (Centre(x, andromeda) and Centre(x, blinny) -> Tenth(x))\n\nnot Redecorate(rudiger, rudiger)\n\nCentre(elbertina, blinny) and forall x (Centre(x, blinny) -> Chiromance(x, rudiger)) -> therefore Chiromance(elbertina, rudiger) Chiromance(elbertina, rudiger) and forall x (Chiromance(x, rudiger) -> Tenth(rudiger)) -> therefore Tenth(rudiger) Tenth(rudiger) and forall x (Tenth(x) -> Redecorate(x, rudiger)) -> therefore Redecorate(rudiger, rudiger)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The horatio case the luna. The doyle steal the horatio. The lorraine bravo the horatio. The luna is rocklike. If someone bravo the horatio then they see the luna. If someone case the lorraine then the lorraine is unfunny. If someone is unfunny and they see the doyle then the doyle is bolshevist. If someone case the horatio then the horatio case the doyle. If someone bravo the luna and the luna case the doyle then the doyle case the horatio. If someone steal the luna then the luna is younger. If someone is younger then they eat the luna. If someone bravo the doyle and they like the horatio then they are younger. The luna does not see the luna.", "logic": "\nCase(horatio, luna)\nSteal(doyle, horatio)\nBravo(lorraine, horatio)\nRocklike(luna)\nforall x (Bravo(x, horatio) -> Steal(x, luna))\nforall x (Case(x, lorraine) -> Unfunny(lorraine))\nforall x (Unfunny(x) and Steal(x, doyle) -> Bolshevist(doyle))\nforall x (Case(x, horatio) -> Case(horatio, doyle))\nforall x (Bravo(x, luna) and Case(luna, doyle) -> Case(doyle, horatio))\nforall x (Steal(x, luna) -> Younger(luna))\nforall x (Younger(x) -> Case(x, luna))\nforall x (Bravo(x, doyle) and Bravo(x, horatio) -> Younger(x))\n\nnot Steal(luna, luna)\n\nforall x (Bravo(x, horatio) -> Steal(x, luna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The tammara barricado the pascal. The ella place the tammara. The lin piece the tammara. The pascal is witchlike. If someone piece the tammara then they see the pascal. If someone barricado the lin then the lin is speedy. If someone is speedy and they see the ella then the ella is carnation. If someone barricado the tammara then the tammara barricado the ella. If someone piece the pascal and the pascal barricado the ella then the ella barricado the tammara. If someone place the pascal then the pascal is vestiary. If someone is vestiary then they eat the pascal. If someone piece the ella and they like the tammara then they are vestiary. The ella is carnation.", "logic": "\nBarricado(tammara, pascal)\nPlace(ella, tammara)\nPiece(lin, tammara)\nWitchlike(pascal)\nforall x (Piece(x, tammara) -> Place(x, pascal))\nforall x (Barricado(x, lin) -> Speedy(lin))\nforall x (Speedy(x) and Place(x, ella) -> Carnation(ella))\nforall x (Barricado(x, tammara) -> Barricado(tammara, ella))\nforall x (Piece(x, pascal) and Barricado(pascal, ella) -> Barricado(ella, tammara))\nforall x (Place(x, pascal) -> Vestiary(pascal))\nforall x (Vestiary(x) -> Barricado(x, pascal))\nforall x (Piece(x, ella) and Piece(x, tammara) -> Vestiary(x))\n\nCarnation(ella)\n\nforall x (Speedy(x) and Place(x, ella) -> Carnation(ella)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The sherwin agitate the lani. The danelle school the sherwin. The elenore profile the sherwin. The lani is uninvited. If someone profile the sherwin then they see the lani. If someone agitate the elenore then the elenore is abreast. If someone is abreast and they see the danelle then the danelle is tragic. If someone agitate the sherwin then the sherwin agitate the danelle. If someone profile the lani and the lani agitate the danelle then the danelle agitate the sherwin. If someone school the lani then the lani is shirty. If someone is shirty then they eat the lani. If someone profile the danelle and they like the sherwin then they are shirty. The danelle is not shirty.", "logic": "\nAgitate(sherwin, lani)\nSchool(danelle, sherwin)\nProfile(elenore, sherwin)\nUninvited(lani)\nforall x (Profile(x, sherwin) -> School(x, lani))\nforall x (Agitate(x, elenore) -> Abreast(elenore))\nforall x (Abreast(x) and School(x, danelle) -> Tragic(danelle))\nforall x (Agitate(x, sherwin) -> Agitate(sherwin, danelle))\nforall x (Profile(x, lani) and Agitate(lani, danelle) -> Agitate(danelle, sherwin))\nforall x (School(x, lani) -> Shirty(lani))\nforall x (Shirty(x) -> Agitate(x, lani))\nforall x (Profile(x, danelle) and Profile(x, sherwin) -> Shirty(x))\n\nnot Shirty(danelle)\n\nforall x (Profile(x, danelle) and Profile(x, sherwin) -> Shirty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The kizzie weave the lorena. The mariette hawk the kizzie. The jock welsh the kizzie. The lorena is linnean. If someone welsh the kizzie then they see the lorena. If someone weave the jock then the jock is afoot. If someone is afoot and they see the mariette then the mariette is monocled. If someone weave the kizzie then the kizzie weave the mariette. If someone welsh the lorena and the lorena weave the mariette then the mariette weave the kizzie. If someone hawk the lorena then the lorena is unbound. If someone is unbound then they eat the lorena. If someone welsh the mariette and they like the kizzie then they are unbound. The mariette weave the lorena.", "logic": "\nWeave(kizzie, lorena)\nHawk(mariette, kizzie)\nWelsh(jock, kizzie)\nLinnean(lorena)\nforall x (Welsh(x, kizzie) -> Hawk(x, lorena))\nforall x (Weave(x, jock) -> Afoot(jock))\nforall x (Afoot(x) and Hawk(x, mariette) -> Monocled(mariette))\nforall x (Weave(x, kizzie) -> Weave(kizzie, mariette))\nforall x (Welsh(x, lorena) and Weave(lorena, mariette) -> Weave(mariette, kizzie))\nforall x (Hawk(x, lorena) -> Unbound(lorena))\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Weave(x, lorena))\nforall x (Welsh(x, mariette) and Welsh(x, kizzie) -> Unbound(x))\n\nWeave(mariette, lorena)\n\nforall x (Unbound(x) -> Weave(x, lorena)) <- forall x (Welsh(x, mariette) and Welsh(x, kizzie) -> Unbound(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The paolina stereotype the felisha. The frederich cede the paolina. The adria deal the paolina. The felisha is eradicable. If someone deal the paolina then they see the felisha. If someone stereotype the adria then the adria is hircine. If someone is hircine and they see the frederich then the frederich is conical. If someone stereotype the paolina then the paolina stereotype the frederich. If someone deal the felisha and the felisha stereotype the frederich then the frederich stereotype the paolina. If someone cede the felisha then the felisha is hiemal. If someone is hiemal then they eat the felisha. If someone deal the frederich and they like the paolina then they are hiemal. The felisha does not eat the adria.", "logic": "\nStereotype(paolina, felisha)\nCede(frederich, paolina)\nDeal(adria, paolina)\nEradicable(felisha)\nforall x (Deal(x, paolina) -> Cede(x, felisha))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, adria) -> Hircine(adria))\nforall x (Hircine(x) and Cede(x, frederich) -> Conical(frederich))\nforall x (Stereotype(x, paolina) -> Stereotype(paolina, frederich))\nforall x (Deal(x, felisha) and Stereotype(felisha, frederich) -> Stereotype(frederich, paolina))\nforall x (Cede(x, felisha) -> Hiemal(felisha))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Stereotype(x, felisha))\nforall x (Deal(x, frederich) and Deal(x, paolina) -> Hiemal(x))\n\nnot Stereotype(felisha, adria)\n\nnot Stereotype(felisha, adria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The buffy beware the shurwood. The prentice forfend the buffy. The say plicate the buffy. The shurwood is bowlegged. If someone plicate the buffy then they see the shurwood. If someone beware the say then the say is sloshed. If someone is sloshed and they see the prentice then the prentice is sappy. If someone beware the buffy then the buffy beware the prentice. If someone plicate the shurwood and the shurwood beware the prentice then the prentice beware the buffy. If someone forfend the shurwood then the shurwood is unschooled. If someone is unschooled then they eat the shurwood. If someone plicate the prentice and they like the buffy then they are unschooled. The buffy beware the buffy.", "logic": "\nBeware(buffy, shurwood)\nForfend(prentice, buffy)\nPlicate(say, buffy)\nBowlegged(shurwood)\nforall x (Plicate(x, buffy) -> Forfend(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Beware(x, say) -> Sloshed(say))\nforall x (Sloshed(x) and Forfend(x, prentice) -> Sappy(prentice))\nforall x (Beware(x, buffy) -> Beware(buffy, prentice))\nforall x (Plicate(x, shurwood) and Beware(shurwood, prentice) -> Beware(prentice, buffy))\nforall x (Forfend(x, shurwood) -> Unschooled(shurwood))\nforall x (Unschooled(x) -> Beware(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Plicate(x, prentice) and Plicate(x, buffy) -> Unschooled(x))\n\nBeware(buffy, buffy)\n\nBeware(buffy, buffy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The davon osculate the grata. The stu rumple the davon. The jeffery kneecap the davon. The grata is requisite. If someone kneecap the davon then they see the grata. If someone osculate the jeffery then the jeffery is scorched. If someone is scorched and they see the stu then the stu is carnation. If someone osculate the davon then the davon osculate the stu. If someone kneecap the grata and the grata osculate the stu then the stu osculate the davon. If someone rumple the grata then the grata is seated. If someone is seated then they eat the grata. If someone kneecap the stu and they like the davon then they are seated. The jeffery does not see the davon.", "logic": "\nOsculate(davon, grata)\nRumple(stu, davon)\nKneecap(jeffery, davon)\nRequisite(grata)\nforall x (Kneecap(x, davon) -> Rumple(x, grata))\nforall x (Osculate(x, jeffery) -> Scorched(jeffery))\nforall x (Scorched(x) and Rumple(x, stu) -> Carnation(stu))\nforall x (Osculate(x, davon) -> Osculate(davon, stu))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, grata) and Osculate(grata, stu) -> Osculate(stu, davon))\nforall x (Rumple(x, grata) -> Seated(grata))\nforall x (Seated(x) -> Osculate(x, grata))\nforall x (Kneecap(x, stu) and Kneecap(x, davon) -> Seated(x))\n\nnot Rumple(jeffery, davon)\n\nnot Rumple(jeffery, davon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The kristal paper the prue. The essie cinematise the kristal. The kellina padlock the kristal. The prue is ignitible. If someone padlock the kristal then they see the prue. If someone paper the kellina then the kellina is huffish. If someone is huffish and they see the essie then the essie is herbaceous. If someone paper the kristal then the kristal paper the essie. If someone padlock the prue and the prue paper the essie then the essie paper the kristal. If someone cinematise the prue then the prue is pithy. If someone is pithy then they eat the prue. If someone padlock the essie and they like the kristal then they are pithy. The kellina padlock the essie.", "logic": "\nPaper(kristal, prue)\nCinematise(essie, kristal)\nPadlock(kellina, kristal)\nIgnitible(prue)\nforall x (Padlock(x, kristal) -> Cinematise(x, prue))\nforall x (Paper(x, kellina) -> Huffish(kellina))\nforall x (Huffish(x) and Cinematise(x, essie) -> Herbaceous(essie))\nforall x (Paper(x, kristal) -> Paper(kristal, essie))\nforall x (Padlock(x, prue) and Paper(prue, essie) -> Paper(essie, kristal))\nforall x (Cinematise(x, prue) -> Pithy(prue))\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> Paper(x, prue))\nforall x (Padlock(x, essie) and Padlock(x, kristal) -> Pithy(x))\n\nPadlock(kellina, essie)\n\nPadlock(kellina, essie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1258"} {"premises": "The claudine tousle the emmeline. The emmeline snort the claudine. The emmeline shriek the claudine. If something shriek the claudine then it snort the claudine. If something tousle the emmeline then the emmeline is knotty. If something tousle the claudine and the claudine is underwater then the claudine tousle the emmeline. If something is knotty then it tousle the emmeline. If something is early and caprine then it snort the claudine. If something tousle the emmeline then it tousle the claudine. The emmeline shriek the claudine.", "logic": "\nTousle(claudine, emmeline)\nSnort(emmeline, claudine)\nShriek(emmeline, claudine)\nforall x (Shriek(x, claudine) -> Snort(x, claudine))\nforall x (Tousle(x, emmeline) -> Knotty(emmeline))\nforall x (Tousle(x, claudine) and Underwater(claudine) -> Tousle(claudine, emmeline))\nforall x (Knotty(x) -> Tousle(x, emmeline))\nforall x (Early(x) and Caprine(x) -> Snort(x, claudine))\nforall x (Tousle(x, emmeline) -> Tousle(x, claudine))\n\nShriek(emmeline, claudine)\n\ntherefore Shriek(emmeline, claudine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The petey ready the adrianne. The adrianne nutate the petey. The adrianne syncretise the petey. If something syncretise the petey then it nutate the petey. If something ready the adrianne then the adrianne is terrene. If something ready the petey and the petey is boring then the petey ready the adrianne. If something is terrene then it ready the adrianne. If something is unequal and mirthful then it nutate the petey. If something ready the adrianne then it ready the petey. The adrianne does not like the petey.", "logic": "\nReady(petey, adrianne)\nNutate(adrianne, petey)\nSyncretise(adrianne, petey)\nforall x (Syncretise(x, petey) -> Nutate(x, petey))\nforall x (Ready(x, adrianne) -> Terrene(adrianne))\nforall x (Ready(x, petey) and Boring(petey) -> Ready(petey, adrianne))\nforall x (Terrene(x) -> Ready(x, adrianne))\nforall x (Unequal(x) and Mirthful(x) -> Nutate(x, petey))\nforall x (Ready(x, adrianne) -> Ready(x, petey))\n\nnot Syncretise(adrianne, petey)\n\ntherefore Syncretise(adrianne, petey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The aliza gormandize the corie. The corie decry the aliza. The corie dispel the aliza. If something dispel the aliza then it decry the aliza. If something gormandize the corie then the corie is disorderly. If something gormandize the aliza and the aliza is submarine then the aliza gormandize the corie. If something is disorderly then it gormandize the corie. If something is galled and indecent then it decry the aliza. If something gormandize the corie then it gormandize the aliza. The corie is disorderly.", "logic": "\nGormandize(aliza, corie)\nDecry(corie, aliza)\nDispel(corie, aliza)\nforall x (Dispel(x, aliza) -> Decry(x, aliza))\nforall x (Gormandize(x, corie) -> Disorderly(corie))\nforall x (Gormandize(x, aliza) and Submarine(aliza) -> Gormandize(aliza, corie))\nforall x (Disorderly(x) -> Gormandize(x, corie))\nforall x (Galled(x) and Indecent(x) -> Decry(x, aliza))\nforall x (Gormandize(x, corie) -> Gormandize(x, aliza))\n\nDisorderly(corie)\n\nGormandize(aliza, corie) and forall x (Gormandize(x, corie) -> Disorderly(corie)) -> therefore Disorderly(corie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The neddie opalesce the marchelle. The marchelle shoehorn the neddie. The marchelle cantillate the neddie. If something cantillate the neddie then it shoehorn the neddie. If something opalesce the marchelle then the marchelle is genetic. If something opalesce the neddie and the neddie is grievous then the neddie opalesce the marchelle. If something is genetic then it opalesce the marchelle. If something is incomplete and acrogenous then it shoehorn the neddie. If something opalesce the marchelle then it opalesce the neddie. The marchelle is not genetic.", "logic": "\nOpalesce(neddie, marchelle)\nShoehorn(marchelle, neddie)\nCantillate(marchelle, neddie)\nforall x (Cantillate(x, neddie) -> Shoehorn(x, neddie))\nforall x (Opalesce(x, marchelle) -> Genetic(marchelle))\nforall x (Opalesce(x, neddie) and Grievous(neddie) -> Opalesce(neddie, marchelle))\nforall x (Genetic(x) -> Opalesce(x, marchelle))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) and Acrogenous(x) -> Shoehorn(x, neddie))\nforall x (Opalesce(x, marchelle) -> Opalesce(x, neddie))\n\nnot Genetic(marchelle)\n\nOpalesce(neddie, marchelle) and forall x (Opalesce(x, marchelle) -> Genetic(marchelle)) -> therefore Genetic(marchelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The twyla button the titos. The titos quantise the twyla. The titos aline the twyla. If something aline the twyla then it quantise the twyla. If something button the titos then the titos is sore. If something button the twyla and the twyla is towheaded then the twyla button the titos. If something is sore then it button the titos. If something is automated and consolable then it quantise the twyla. If something button the titos then it button the twyla. The titos button the titos.", "logic": "\nButton(twyla, titos)\nQuantise(titos, twyla)\nAline(titos, twyla)\nforall x (Aline(x, twyla) -> Quantise(x, twyla))\nforall x (Button(x, titos) -> Sore(titos))\nforall x (Button(x, twyla) and Towheaded(twyla) -> Button(twyla, titos))\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Button(x, titos))\nforall x (Automated(x) and Consolable(x) -> Quantise(x, twyla))\nforall x (Button(x, titos) -> Button(x, twyla))\n\nButton(titos, titos)\n\nButton(twyla, titos) and forall x (Button(x, titos) -> Sore(titos)) -> therefore Sore(titos) Sore(titos) and forall x (Sore(x) -> Button(x, titos)) -> therefore Button(titos, titos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The kary photograph the fowler. The fowler wager the kary. The fowler whirr the kary. If something whirr the kary then it wager the kary. If something photograph the fowler then the fowler is proustian. If something photograph the kary and the kary is perishable then the kary photograph the fowler. If something is proustian then it photograph the fowler. If something is cairned and saprobic then it wager the kary. If something photograph the fowler then it photograph the kary. The fowler does not see the fowler.", "logic": "\nPhotograph(kary, fowler)\nWager(fowler, kary)\nWhirr(fowler, kary)\nforall x (Whirr(x, kary) -> Wager(x, kary))\nforall x (Photograph(x, fowler) -> Proustian(fowler))\nforall x (Photograph(x, kary) and Perishable(kary) -> Photograph(kary, fowler))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Photograph(x, fowler))\nforall x (Cairned(x) and Saprobic(x) -> Wager(x, kary))\nforall x (Photograph(x, fowler) -> Photograph(x, kary))\n\nnot Photograph(fowler, fowler)\n\nPhotograph(kary, fowler) and forall x (Photograph(x, fowler) -> Proustian(fowler)) -> therefore Proustian(fowler) Proustian(fowler) and forall x (Proustian(x) -> Photograph(x, fowler)) -> therefore Photograph(fowler, fowler)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The kaspar delineate the sophronia. The sophronia neck the kaspar. The sophronia link the kaspar. If something link the kaspar then it neck the kaspar. If something delineate the sophronia then the sophronia is swanky. If something delineate the kaspar and the kaspar is cogged then the kaspar delineate the sophronia. If something is swanky then it delineate the sophronia. If something is dissoluble and prostatic then it neck the kaspar. If something delineate the sophronia then it delineate the kaspar. The sophronia delineate the kaspar.", "logic": "\nDelineate(kaspar, sophronia)\nNeck(sophronia, kaspar)\nLink(sophronia, kaspar)\nforall x (Link(x, kaspar) -> Neck(x, kaspar))\nforall x (Delineate(x, sophronia) -> Swanky(sophronia))\nforall x (Delineate(x, kaspar) and Cogged(kaspar) -> Delineate(kaspar, sophronia))\nforall x (Swanky(x) -> Delineate(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Dissoluble(x) and Prostatic(x) -> Neck(x, kaspar))\nforall x (Delineate(x, sophronia) -> Delineate(x, kaspar))\n\nDelineate(sophronia, kaspar)\n\nDelineate(kaspar, sophronia) and forall x (Delineate(x, sophronia) -> Swanky(sophronia)) -> therefore Swanky(sophronia) Swanky(sophronia) and forall x (Swanky(x) -> Delineate(x, sophronia)) -> therefore Delineate(sophronia, sophronia) Delineate(sophronia, sophronia) and forall x (Delineate(x, sophronia) -> Delineate(x, kaspar)) -> therefore Delineate(sophronia, kaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The charleen deform the waneta. The waneta recompense the charleen. The waneta starboard the charleen. If something starboard the charleen then it recompense the charleen. If something deform the waneta then the waneta is monodic. If something deform the charleen and the charleen is jammed then the charleen deform the waneta. If something is monodic then it deform the waneta. If something is cuddly and appraising then it recompense the charleen. If something deform the waneta then it deform the charleen. The waneta does not see the charleen.", "logic": "\nDeform(charleen, waneta)\nRecompense(waneta, charleen)\nStarboard(waneta, charleen)\nforall x (Starboard(x, charleen) -> Recompense(x, charleen))\nforall x (Deform(x, waneta) -> Monodic(waneta))\nforall x (Deform(x, charleen) and Jammed(charleen) -> Deform(charleen, waneta))\nforall x (Monodic(x) -> Deform(x, waneta))\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and Appraising(x) -> Recompense(x, charleen))\nforall x (Deform(x, waneta) -> Deform(x, charleen))\n\nnot Deform(waneta, charleen)\n\nDeform(charleen, waneta) and forall x (Deform(x, waneta) -> Monodic(waneta)) -> therefore Monodic(waneta) Monodic(waneta) and forall x (Monodic(x) -> Deform(x, waneta)) -> therefore Deform(waneta, waneta) Deform(waneta, waneta) and forall x (Deform(x, waneta) -> Deform(x, charleen)) -> therefore Deform(waneta, charleen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The thurston prefigure the lyndel. The lyndel inundate the thurston. The lyndel fritter the thurston. If something fritter the thurston then it inundate the thurston. If something prefigure the lyndel then the lyndel is romance. If something prefigure the thurston and the thurston is merry then the thurston prefigure the lyndel. If something is romance then it prefigure the lyndel. If something is olympian and compatible then it inundate the thurston. If something prefigure the lyndel then it prefigure the thurston. The thurston does not chase the thurston.", "logic": "\nPrefigure(thurston, lyndel)\nInundate(lyndel, thurston)\nFritter(lyndel, thurston)\nforall x (Fritter(x, thurston) -> Inundate(x, thurston))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, lyndel) -> Romance(lyndel))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, thurston) and Merry(thurston) -> Prefigure(thurston, lyndel))\nforall x (Romance(x) -> Prefigure(x, lyndel))\nforall x (Olympian(x) and Compatible(x) -> Inundate(x, thurston))\nforall x (Prefigure(x, lyndel) -> Prefigure(x, thurston))\n\nnot Inundate(thurston, thurston)\n\nforall x (Fritter(x, thurston) -> Inundate(x, thurston)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The binnie thrust the wood. The wood effervesce the binnie. The wood nitrate the binnie. If something nitrate the binnie then it effervesce the binnie. If something thrust the wood then the wood is nosed. If something thrust the binnie and the binnie is main then the binnie thrust the wood. If something is nosed then it thrust the wood. If something is toughened and subacute then it effervesce the binnie. If something thrust the wood then it thrust the binnie. The binnie nitrate the wood.", "logic": "\nThrust(binnie, wood)\nEffervesce(wood, binnie)\nNitrate(wood, binnie)\nforall x (Nitrate(x, binnie) -> Effervesce(x, binnie))\nforall x (Thrust(x, wood) -> Nosed(wood))\nforall x (Thrust(x, binnie) and Main(binnie) -> Thrust(binnie, wood))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Thrust(x, wood))\nforall x (Toughened(x) and Subacute(x) -> Effervesce(x, binnie))\nforall x (Thrust(x, wood) -> Thrust(x, binnie))\n\nNitrate(binnie, wood)\n\nNitrate(binnie, wood) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The xena stink the tymothy. The tymothy unknot the xena. The tymothy poetise the xena. If something poetise the xena then it unknot the xena. If something stink the tymothy then the tymothy is applicable. If something stink the xena and the xena is volitional then the xena stink the tymothy. If something is applicable then it stink the tymothy. If something is ameboid and indexless then it unknot the xena. If something stink the tymothy then it stink the xena. The tymothy is not indexless.", "logic": "\nStink(xena, tymothy)\nUnknot(tymothy, xena)\nPoetise(tymothy, xena)\nforall x (Poetise(x, xena) -> Unknot(x, xena))\nforall x (Stink(x, tymothy) -> Applicable(tymothy))\nforall x (Stink(x, xena) and Volitional(xena) -> Stink(xena, tymothy))\nforall x (Applicable(x) -> Stink(x, tymothy))\nforall x (Ameboid(x) and Indexless(x) -> Unknot(x, xena))\nforall x (Stink(x, tymothy) -> Stink(x, xena))\n\nnot Indexless(tymothy)\n\nnot Indexless(tymothy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The helge eternize the jermaine. The jermaine allocate the helge. The jermaine damascene the helge. If something damascene the helge then it allocate the helge. If something eternize the jermaine then the jermaine is obtainable. If something eternize the helge and the helge is tyrannical then the helge eternize the jermaine. If something is obtainable then it eternize the jermaine. If something is accurst and dismissed then it allocate the helge. If something eternize the jermaine then it eternize the helge. The helge is tyrannical.", "logic": "\nEternize(helge, jermaine)\nAllocate(jermaine, helge)\nDamascene(jermaine, helge)\nforall x (Damascene(x, helge) -> Allocate(x, helge))\nforall x (Eternize(x, jermaine) -> Obtainable(jermaine))\nforall x (Eternize(x, helge) and Tyrannical(helge) -> Eternize(helge, jermaine))\nforall x (Obtainable(x) -> Eternize(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Accurst(x) and Dismissed(x) -> Allocate(x, helge))\nforall x (Eternize(x, jermaine) -> Eternize(x, helge))\n\nTyrannical(helge)\n\nTyrannical(helge) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The cody lurch the alameda. The alameda bouse the cody. The alameda huff the cody. If something huff the cody then it bouse the cody. If something lurch the alameda then the alameda is myriad. If something lurch the cody and the cody is neoplastic then the cody lurch the alameda. If something is myriad then it lurch the alameda. If something is monopteral and dyspeptic then it bouse the cody. If something lurch the alameda then it lurch the cody. The cody does not like the cody.", "logic": "\nLurch(cody, alameda)\nBouse(alameda, cody)\nHuff(alameda, cody)\nforall x (Huff(x, cody) -> Bouse(x, cody))\nforall x (Lurch(x, alameda) -> Myriad(alameda))\nforall x (Lurch(x, cody) and Neoplastic(cody) -> Lurch(cody, alameda))\nforall x (Myriad(x) -> Lurch(x, alameda))\nforall x (Monopteral(x) and Dyspeptic(x) -> Bouse(x, cody))\nforall x (Lurch(x, alameda) -> Lurch(x, cody))\n\nnot Huff(cody, cody)\n\nnot Huff(cody, cody) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The toma dapple the meggan. The meggan chairman the toma. The meggan halt the toma. If something halt the toma then it chairman the toma. If something dapple the meggan then the meggan is critical. If something dapple the toma and the toma is missional then the toma dapple the meggan. If something is critical then it dapple the meggan. If something is ancestral and unborn then it chairman the toma. If something dapple the meggan then it dapple the toma. The toma is round.", "logic": "\nDapple(toma, meggan)\nChairman(meggan, toma)\nHalt(meggan, toma)\nforall x (Halt(x, toma) -> Chairman(x, toma))\nforall x (Dapple(x, meggan) -> Critical(meggan))\nforall x (Dapple(x, toma) and Missional(toma) -> Dapple(toma, meggan))\nforall x (Critical(x) -> Dapple(x, meggan))\nforall x (Ancestral(x) and Unborn(x) -> Chairman(x, toma))\nforall x (Dapple(x, meggan) -> Dapple(x, toma))\n\nRound(toma)\n\nRound(toma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The helmuth sightsee the rivy. The rivy relive the helmuth. The rivy paper the helmuth. If something paper the helmuth then it relive the helmuth. If something sightsee the rivy then the rivy is embryotic. If something sightsee the helmuth and the helmuth is malcontent then the helmuth sightsee the rivy. If something is embryotic then it sightsee the rivy. If something is mitigated and abrasive then it relive the helmuth. If something sightsee the rivy then it sightsee the helmuth. The helmuth is not mitigated.", "logic": "\nSightsee(helmuth, rivy)\nRelive(rivy, helmuth)\nPaper(rivy, helmuth)\nforall x (Paper(x, helmuth) -> Relive(x, helmuth))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, rivy) -> Embryotic(rivy))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, helmuth) and Malcontent(helmuth) -> Sightsee(helmuth, rivy))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) -> Sightsee(x, rivy))\nforall x (Mitigated(x) and Abrasive(x) -> Relive(x, helmuth))\nforall x (Sightsee(x, rivy) -> Sightsee(x, helmuth))\n\nnot Mitigated(helmuth)\n\nnot Mitigated(helmuth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The eduardo circumvent the rustie. The rustie evince the eduardo. The rustie globalise the eduardo. If something globalise the eduardo then it evince the eduardo. If something circumvent the rustie then the rustie is knockabout. If something circumvent the eduardo and the eduardo is immediate then the eduardo circumvent the rustie. If something is knockabout then it circumvent the rustie. If something is nosy and ruritanian then it evince the eduardo. If something circumvent the rustie then it circumvent the eduardo. The eduardo is ruritanian.", "logic": "\nCircumvent(eduardo, rustie)\nEvince(rustie, eduardo)\nGlobalise(rustie, eduardo)\nforall x (Globalise(x, eduardo) -> Evince(x, eduardo))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, rustie) -> Knockabout(rustie))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, eduardo) and Immediate(eduardo) -> Circumvent(eduardo, rustie))\nforall x (Knockabout(x) -> Circumvent(x, rustie))\nforall x (Nosy(x) and Ruritanian(x) -> Evince(x, eduardo))\nforall x (Circumvent(x, rustie) -> Circumvent(x, eduardo))\n\nRuritanian(eduardo)\n\nRuritanian(eduardo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1500"} {"premises": "The amabelle highlight the opalina. The amabelle highlight the kikelia. The amabelle outpace the kikelia. The janella is homoecious. The janella wage the kikelia. The opalina is lowbrow. The opalina wage the janella. The kikelia outpace the janella. The kikelia does not see the opalina. The kikelia wage the opalina. If something wage the opalina then it is hotheaded. If something is hotheaded then it wage the amabelle. If something outpace the opalina and it is homoecious then the opalina highlight the kikelia. If something is hotheaded then it is homoecious. If the amabelle does not chase the opalina then the opalina is lowbrow. All homoecious things are lowbrow. The amabelle highlight the opalina.", "logic": "\nHighlight(amabelle, opalina)\nHighlight(amabelle, kikelia)\nOutpace(amabelle, kikelia)\nHomoecious(janella)\nWage(janella, kikelia)\nLowbrow(opalina)\nWage(opalina, janella)\nOutpace(kikelia, janella)\nnot Outpace(kikelia, opalina)\nWage(kikelia, opalina)\nforall x (Wage(x, opalina) -> Hotheaded(x))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Wage(x, amabelle))\nforall x (Outpace(x, opalina) and Homoecious(x) -> Highlight(opalina, kikelia))\nforall x (Hotheaded(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nnot Highlight(amabelle, opalina) -> Lowbrow(opalina)\nforall x (Homoecious(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\n\nHighlight(amabelle, opalina)\n\ntherefore Highlight(amabelle, opalina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The kent shield the lainey. The kent shield the eulalie. The kent susurrate the eulalie. The renata is grand. The renata smoke the eulalie. The lainey is weblike. The lainey smoke the renata. The eulalie susurrate the renata. The eulalie does not see the lainey. The eulalie smoke the lainey. If something smoke the lainey then it is basal. If something is basal then it smoke the kent. If something susurrate the lainey and it is grand then the lainey shield the eulalie. If something is basal then it is grand. If the kent does not chase the lainey then the lainey is weblike. All grand things are weblike. The lainey does not visit the renata.", "logic": "\nShield(kent, lainey)\nShield(kent, eulalie)\nSusurrate(kent, eulalie)\nGrand(renata)\nSmoke(renata, eulalie)\nWeblike(lainey)\nSmoke(lainey, renata)\nSusurrate(eulalie, renata)\nnot Susurrate(eulalie, lainey)\nSmoke(eulalie, lainey)\nforall x (Smoke(x, lainey) -> Basal(x))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Smoke(x, kent))\nforall x (Susurrate(x, lainey) and Grand(x) -> Shield(lainey, eulalie))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Grand(x))\nnot Shield(kent, lainey) -> Weblike(lainey)\nforall x (Grand(x) -> Weblike(x))\n\nnot Smoke(lainey, renata)\n\ntherefore Smoke(lainey, renata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The roslyn crawfish the susie. The roslyn crawfish the nara. The roslyn interdict the nara. The schroeder is potent. The schroeder sadden the nara. The susie is touched. The susie sadden the schroeder. The nara interdict the schroeder. The nara does not see the susie. The nara sadden the susie. If something sadden the susie then it is stagy. If something is stagy then it sadden the roslyn. If something interdict the susie and it is potent then the susie crawfish the nara. If something is stagy then it is potent. If the roslyn does not chase the susie then the susie is touched. All potent things are touched. The nara is stagy.", "logic": "\nCrawfish(roslyn, susie)\nCrawfish(roslyn, nara)\nInterdict(roslyn, nara)\nPotent(schroeder)\nSadden(schroeder, nara)\nTouched(susie)\nSadden(susie, schroeder)\nInterdict(nara, schroeder)\nnot Interdict(nara, susie)\nSadden(nara, susie)\nforall x (Sadden(x, susie) -> Stagy(x))\nforall x (Stagy(x) -> Sadden(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Interdict(x, susie) and Potent(x) -> Crawfish(susie, nara))\nforall x (Stagy(x) -> Potent(x))\nnot Crawfish(roslyn, susie) -> Touched(susie)\nforall x (Potent(x) -> Touched(x))\n\nStagy(nara)\n\nSadden(nara, susie) and forall x (Sadden(x, susie) -> Stagy(x)) -> therefore Stagy(nara)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The jamie outsource the erda. The jamie outsource the rosita. The jamie harp the rosita. The brandy is unaerated. The brandy photograph the rosita. The erda is avellan. The erda photograph the brandy. The rosita harp the brandy. The rosita does not see the erda. The rosita photograph the erda. If something photograph the erda then it is curled. If something is curled then it photograph the jamie. If something harp the erda and it is unaerated then the erda outsource the rosita. If something is curled then it is unaerated. If the jamie does not chase the erda then the erda is avellan. All unaerated things are avellan. The rosita is not curled.", "logic": "\nOutsource(jamie, erda)\nOutsource(jamie, rosita)\nHarp(jamie, rosita)\nUnaerated(brandy)\nPhotograph(brandy, rosita)\nAvellan(erda)\nPhotograph(erda, brandy)\nHarp(rosita, brandy)\nnot Harp(rosita, erda)\nPhotograph(rosita, erda)\nforall x (Photograph(x, erda) -> Curled(x))\nforall x (Curled(x) -> Photograph(x, jamie))\nforall x (Harp(x, erda) and Unaerated(x) -> Outsource(erda, rosita))\nforall x (Curled(x) -> Unaerated(x))\nnot Outsource(jamie, erda) -> Avellan(erda)\nforall x (Unaerated(x) -> Avellan(x))\n\nnot Curled(rosita)\n\nPhotograph(rosita, erda) and forall x (Photograph(x, erda) -> Curled(x)) -> therefore Curled(rosita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The otho teem the nicolette. The otho teem the avie. The otho tincture the avie. The oran is apogamic. The oran enplane the avie. The nicolette is trapped. The nicolette enplane the oran. The avie tincture the oran. The avie does not see the nicolette. The avie enplane the nicolette. If something enplane the nicolette then it is toughened. If something is toughened then it enplane the otho. If something tincture the nicolette and it is apogamic then the nicolette teem the avie. If something is toughened then it is apogamic. If the otho does not chase the nicolette then the nicolette is trapped. All apogamic things are trapped. The avie is apogamic.", "logic": "\nTeem(otho, nicolette)\nTeem(otho, avie)\nTincture(otho, avie)\nApogamic(oran)\nEnplane(oran, avie)\nTrapped(nicolette)\nEnplane(nicolette, oran)\nTincture(avie, oran)\nnot Tincture(avie, nicolette)\nEnplane(avie, nicolette)\nforall x (Enplane(x, nicolette) -> Toughened(x))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Enplane(x, otho))\nforall x (Tincture(x, nicolette) and Apogamic(x) -> Teem(nicolette, avie))\nforall x (Toughened(x) -> Apogamic(x))\nnot Teem(otho, nicolette) -> Trapped(nicolette)\nforall x (Apogamic(x) -> Trapped(x))\n\nApogamic(avie)\n\nEnplane(avie, nicolette) and forall x (Enplane(x, nicolette) -> Toughened(x)) -> therefore Toughened(avie) Toughened(avie) and forall x (Toughened(x) -> Apogamic(x)) -> therefore Apogamic(avie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The carolan disperse the thalia. The carolan disperse the eberhard. The carolan skive the eberhard. The cristine is songful. The cristine placard the eberhard. The thalia is sightly. The thalia placard the cristine. The eberhard skive the cristine. The eberhard does not see the thalia. The eberhard placard the thalia. If something placard the thalia then it is peaky. If something is peaky then it placard the carolan. If something skive the thalia and it is songful then the thalia disperse the eberhard. If something is peaky then it is songful. If the carolan does not chase the thalia then the thalia is sightly. All songful things are sightly. The eberhard is not songful.", "logic": "\nDisperse(carolan, thalia)\nDisperse(carolan, eberhard)\nSkive(carolan, eberhard)\nSongful(cristine)\nPlacard(cristine, eberhard)\nSightly(thalia)\nPlacard(thalia, cristine)\nSkive(eberhard, cristine)\nnot Skive(eberhard, thalia)\nPlacard(eberhard, thalia)\nforall x (Placard(x, thalia) -> Peaky(x))\nforall x (Peaky(x) -> Placard(x, carolan))\nforall x (Skive(x, thalia) and Songful(x) -> Disperse(thalia, eberhard))\nforall x (Peaky(x) -> Songful(x))\nnot Disperse(carolan, thalia) -> Sightly(thalia)\nforall x (Songful(x) -> Sightly(x))\n\nnot Songful(eberhard)\n\nPlacard(eberhard, thalia) and forall x (Placard(x, thalia) -> Peaky(x)) -> therefore Peaky(eberhard) Peaky(eberhard) and forall x (Peaky(x) -> Songful(x)) -> therefore Songful(eberhard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The dode obnubilate the stevana. The dode obnubilate the vite. The dode misname the vite. The illa is decorative. The illa bosom the vite. The stevana is lacerated. The stevana bosom the illa. The vite misname the illa. The vite does not see the stevana. The vite bosom the stevana. If something bosom the stevana then it is canorous. If something is canorous then it bosom the dode. If something misname the stevana and it is decorative then the stevana obnubilate the vite. If something is canorous then it is decorative. If the dode does not chase the stevana then the stevana is lacerated. All decorative things are lacerated. The vite is lacerated.", "logic": "\nObnubilate(dode, stevana)\nObnubilate(dode, vite)\nMisname(dode, vite)\nDecorative(illa)\nBosom(illa, vite)\nLacerated(stevana)\nBosom(stevana, illa)\nMisname(vite, illa)\nnot Misname(vite, stevana)\nBosom(vite, stevana)\nforall x (Bosom(x, stevana) -> Canorous(x))\nforall x (Canorous(x) -> Bosom(x, dode))\nforall x (Misname(x, stevana) and Decorative(x) -> Obnubilate(stevana, vite))\nforall x (Canorous(x) -> Decorative(x))\nnot Obnubilate(dode, stevana) -> Lacerated(stevana)\nforall x (Decorative(x) -> Lacerated(x))\n\nLacerated(vite)\n\nBosom(vite, stevana) and forall x (Bosom(x, stevana) -> Canorous(x)) -> therefore Canorous(vite) Canorous(vite) and forall x (Canorous(x) -> Decorative(x)) -> therefore Decorative(vite) Decorative(vite) and forall x (Decorative(x) -> Lacerated(x)) -> therefore Lacerated(vite)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The laurent resurge the netty. The laurent resurge the antonella. The laurent starch the antonella. The antone is configured. The antone trivialize the antonella. The netty is cancellous. The netty trivialize the antone. The antonella starch the antone. The antonella does not see the netty. The antonella trivialize the netty. If something trivialize the netty then it is brattish. If something is brattish then it trivialize the laurent. If something starch the netty and it is configured then the netty resurge the antonella. If something is brattish then it is configured. If the laurent does not chase the netty then the netty is cancellous. All configured things are cancellous. The antonella is not cancellous.", "logic": "\nResurge(laurent, netty)\nResurge(laurent, antonella)\nStarch(laurent, antonella)\nConfigured(antone)\nTrivialize(antone, antonella)\nCancellous(netty)\nTrivialize(netty, antone)\nStarch(antonella, antone)\nnot Starch(antonella, netty)\nTrivialize(antonella, netty)\nforall x (Trivialize(x, netty) -> Brattish(x))\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> Trivialize(x, laurent))\nforall x (Starch(x, netty) and Configured(x) -> Resurge(netty, antonella))\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> Configured(x))\nnot Resurge(laurent, netty) -> Cancellous(netty)\nforall x (Configured(x) -> Cancellous(x))\n\nnot Cancellous(antonella)\n\nTrivialize(antonella, netty) and forall x (Trivialize(x, netty) -> Brattish(x)) -> therefore Brattish(antonella) Brattish(antonella) and forall x (Brattish(x) -> Configured(x)) -> therefore Configured(antonella) Configured(antonella) and forall x (Configured(x) -> Cancellous(x)) -> therefore Cancellous(antonella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The liana join the nariko. The liana join the atlante. The liana seduce the atlante. The keriann is crumbly. The keriann sermonise the atlante. The nariko is schematic. The nariko sermonise the keriann. The atlante seduce the keriann. The atlante does not see the nariko. The atlante sermonise the nariko. If something sermonise the nariko then it is insentient. If something is insentient then it sermonise the liana. If something seduce the nariko and it is crumbly then the nariko join the atlante. If something is insentient then it is crumbly. If the liana does not chase the nariko then the nariko is schematic. All crumbly things are schematic. The nariko does not chase the atlante.", "logic": "\nJoin(liana, nariko)\nJoin(liana, atlante)\nSeduce(liana, atlante)\nCrumbly(keriann)\nSermonise(keriann, atlante)\nSchematic(nariko)\nSermonise(nariko, keriann)\nSeduce(atlante, keriann)\nnot Seduce(atlante, nariko)\nSermonise(atlante, nariko)\nforall x (Sermonise(x, nariko) -> Insentient(x))\nforall x (Insentient(x) -> Sermonise(x, liana))\nforall x (Seduce(x, nariko) and Crumbly(x) -> Join(nariko, atlante))\nforall x (Insentient(x) -> Crumbly(x))\nnot Join(liana, nariko) -> Schematic(nariko)\nforall x (Crumbly(x) -> Schematic(x))\n\nnot Join(nariko, atlante)\n\nforall x (Seduce(x, nariko) and Crumbly(x) -> Join(nariko, atlante)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The luanna pave the rachel. The luanna pave the roanna. The luanna muck the roanna. The franky is exhausted. The franky displease the roanna. The rachel is probative. The rachel displease the franky. The roanna muck the franky. The roanna does not see the rachel. The roanna displease the rachel. If something displease the rachel then it is pious. If something is pious then it displease the luanna. If something muck the rachel and it is exhausted then the rachel pave the roanna. If something is pious then it is exhausted. If the luanna does not chase the rachel then the rachel is probative. All exhausted things are probative. The rachel is exhausted.", "logic": "\nPave(luanna, rachel)\nPave(luanna, roanna)\nMuck(luanna, roanna)\nExhausted(franky)\nDisplease(franky, roanna)\nProbative(rachel)\nDisplease(rachel, franky)\nMuck(roanna, franky)\nnot Muck(roanna, rachel)\nDisplease(roanna, rachel)\nforall x (Displease(x, rachel) -> Pious(x))\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Displease(x, luanna))\nforall x (Muck(x, rachel) and Exhausted(x) -> Pave(rachel, roanna))\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Exhausted(x))\nnot Pave(luanna, rachel) -> Probative(rachel)\nforall x (Exhausted(x) -> Probative(x))\n\nExhausted(rachel)\n\nforall x (Pious(x) -> Exhausted(x)) <- forall x (Displease(x, rachel) -> Pious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The creighton crew the maurits. The creighton crew the kendal. The creighton bray the kendal. The patricia is sophistic. The patricia irradiate the kendal. The maurits is bellied. The maurits irradiate the patricia. The kendal bray the patricia. The kendal does not see the maurits. The kendal irradiate the maurits. If something irradiate the maurits then it is vaporish. If something is vaporish then it irradiate the creighton. If something bray the maurits and it is sophistic then the maurits crew the kendal. If something is vaporish then it is sophistic. If the creighton does not chase the maurits then the maurits is bellied. All sophistic things are bellied. The patricia is not vaporish.", "logic": "\nCrew(creighton, maurits)\nCrew(creighton, kendal)\nBray(creighton, kendal)\nSophistic(patricia)\nIrradiate(patricia, kendal)\nBellied(maurits)\nIrradiate(maurits, patricia)\nBray(kendal, patricia)\nnot Bray(kendal, maurits)\nIrradiate(kendal, maurits)\nforall x (Irradiate(x, maurits) -> Vaporish(x))\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Irradiate(x, creighton))\nforall x (Bray(x, maurits) and Sophistic(x) -> Crew(maurits, kendal))\nforall x (Vaporish(x) -> Sophistic(x))\nnot Crew(creighton, maurits) -> Bellied(maurits)\nforall x (Sophistic(x) -> Bellied(x))\n\nnot Vaporish(patricia)\n\nforall x (Irradiate(x, maurits) -> Vaporish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The lynnette postpose the daren. The lynnette postpose the louisa. The lynnette journey the louisa. The kimball is undutiful. The kimball honey the louisa. The daren is stoned. The daren honey the kimball. The louisa journey the kimball. The louisa does not see the daren. The louisa honey the daren. If something honey the daren then it is roughshod. If something is roughshod then it honey the lynnette. If something journey the daren and it is undutiful then the daren postpose the louisa. If something is roughshod then it is undutiful. If the lynnette does not chase the daren then the daren is stoned. All undutiful things are stoned. The daren honey the lynnette.", "logic": "\nPostpose(lynnette, daren)\nPostpose(lynnette, louisa)\nJourney(lynnette, louisa)\nUndutiful(kimball)\nHoney(kimball, louisa)\nStoned(daren)\nHoney(daren, kimball)\nJourney(louisa, kimball)\nnot Journey(louisa, daren)\nHoney(louisa, daren)\nforall x (Honey(x, daren) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Honey(x, lynnette))\nforall x (Journey(x, daren) and Undutiful(x) -> Postpose(daren, louisa))\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Undutiful(x))\nnot Postpose(lynnette, daren) -> Stoned(daren)\nforall x (Undutiful(x) -> Stoned(x))\n\nHoney(daren, lynnette)\n\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Honey(x, lynnette)) <- forall x (Honey(x, daren) -> Roughshod(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The ikey drink the lyndy. The ikey drink the anneliese. The ikey deprive the anneliese. The genvieve is together. The genvieve haggle the anneliese. The lyndy is unprovoked. The lyndy haggle the genvieve. The anneliese deprive the genvieve. The anneliese does not see the lyndy. The anneliese haggle the lyndy. If something haggle the lyndy then it is epizoan. If something is epizoan then it haggle the ikey. If something deprive the lyndy and it is together then the lyndy drink the anneliese. If something is epizoan then it is together. If the ikey does not chase the lyndy then the lyndy is unprovoked. All together things are unprovoked. The lyndy does not see the lyndy.", "logic": "\nDrink(ikey, lyndy)\nDrink(ikey, anneliese)\nDeprive(ikey, anneliese)\nTogether(genvieve)\nHaggle(genvieve, anneliese)\nUnprovoked(lyndy)\nHaggle(lyndy, genvieve)\nDeprive(anneliese, genvieve)\nnot Deprive(anneliese, lyndy)\nHaggle(anneliese, lyndy)\nforall x (Haggle(x, lyndy) -> Epizoan(x))\nforall x (Epizoan(x) -> Haggle(x, ikey))\nforall x (Deprive(x, lyndy) and Together(x) -> Drink(lyndy, anneliese))\nforall x (Epizoan(x) -> Together(x))\nnot Drink(ikey, lyndy) -> Unprovoked(lyndy)\nforall x (Together(x) -> Unprovoked(x))\n\nnot Deprive(lyndy, lyndy)\n\nnot Deprive(lyndy, lyndy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The gerhard tumefy the emilee. The gerhard tumefy the annaliese. The gerhard struggle the annaliese. The violetta is unsaddled. The violetta skirt the annaliese. The emilee is subduable. The emilee skirt the violetta. The annaliese struggle the violetta. The annaliese does not see the emilee. The annaliese skirt the emilee. If something skirt the emilee then it is premium. If something is premium then it skirt the gerhard. If something struggle the emilee and it is unsaddled then the emilee tumefy the annaliese. If something is premium then it is unsaddled. If the gerhard does not chase the emilee then the emilee is subduable. All unsaddled things are subduable. The gerhard skirt the annaliese.", "logic": "\nTumefy(gerhard, emilee)\nTumefy(gerhard, annaliese)\nStruggle(gerhard, annaliese)\nUnsaddled(violetta)\nSkirt(violetta, annaliese)\nSubduable(emilee)\nSkirt(emilee, violetta)\nStruggle(annaliese, violetta)\nnot Struggle(annaliese, emilee)\nSkirt(annaliese, emilee)\nforall x (Skirt(x, emilee) -> Premium(x))\nforall x (Premium(x) -> Skirt(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Struggle(x, emilee) and Unsaddled(x) -> Tumefy(emilee, annaliese))\nforall x (Premium(x) -> Unsaddled(x))\nnot Tumefy(gerhard, emilee) -> Subduable(emilee)\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Subduable(x))\n\nSkirt(gerhard, annaliese)\n\nSkirt(gerhard, annaliese) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The marlo platinize the zane. The marlo platinize the laverna. The marlo demise the laverna. The florrie is meltable. The florrie ladle the laverna. The zane is foaming. The zane ladle the florrie. The laverna demise the florrie. The laverna does not see the zane. The laverna ladle the zane. If something ladle the zane then it is unsaddled. If something is unsaddled then it ladle the marlo. If something demise the zane and it is meltable then the zane platinize the laverna. If something is unsaddled then it is meltable. If the marlo does not chase the zane then the zane is foaming. All meltable things are foaming. The marlo does not visit the florrie.", "logic": "\nPlatinize(marlo, zane)\nPlatinize(marlo, laverna)\nDemise(marlo, laverna)\nMeltable(florrie)\nLadle(florrie, laverna)\nFoaming(zane)\nLadle(zane, florrie)\nDemise(laverna, florrie)\nnot Demise(laverna, zane)\nLadle(laverna, zane)\nforall x (Ladle(x, zane) -> Unsaddled(x))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Ladle(x, marlo))\nforall x (Demise(x, zane) and Meltable(x) -> Platinize(zane, laverna))\nforall x (Unsaddled(x) -> Meltable(x))\nnot Platinize(marlo, zane) -> Foaming(zane)\nforall x (Meltable(x) -> Foaming(x))\n\nnot Ladle(marlo, florrie)\n\nnot Ladle(marlo, florrie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The jillie posture the drake. The jillie posture the marylynne. The jillie loaf the marylynne. The celestina is broke. The celestina swoosh the marylynne. The drake is organismal. The drake swoosh the celestina. The marylynne loaf the celestina. The marylynne does not see the drake. The marylynne swoosh the drake. If something swoosh the drake then it is raunchy. If something is raunchy then it swoosh the jillie. If something loaf the drake and it is broke then the drake posture the marylynne. If something is raunchy then it is broke. If the jillie does not chase the drake then the drake is organismal. All broke things are organismal. The drake loaf the celestina.", "logic": "\nPosture(jillie, drake)\nPosture(jillie, marylynne)\nLoaf(jillie, marylynne)\nBroke(celestina)\nSwoosh(celestina, marylynne)\nOrganismal(drake)\nSwoosh(drake, celestina)\nLoaf(marylynne, celestina)\nnot Loaf(marylynne, drake)\nSwoosh(marylynne, drake)\nforall x (Swoosh(x, drake) -> Raunchy(x))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Swoosh(x, jillie))\nforall x (Loaf(x, drake) and Broke(x) -> Posture(drake, marylynne))\nforall x (Raunchy(x) -> Broke(x))\nnot Posture(jillie, drake) -> Organismal(drake)\nforall x (Broke(x) -> Organismal(x))\n\nLoaf(drake, celestina)\n\nLoaf(drake, celestina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-593"} {"premises": "The chadwick endanger the crysta. The chadwick is searching. The chadwick is annoyed. The chadwick is cardboard. The chadwick is carven. The chadwick is fetal. The chadwick nose the crysta. The chadwick disown the crysta. The crysta endanger the chadwick. The crysta is searching. The crysta is annoyed. The crysta is cardboard. The crysta is carven. The crysta is fetal. The crysta nose the chadwick. The crysta disown the chadwick. If someone nose the crysta and they visit the chadwick then the chadwick nose the crysta. If someone nose the chadwick and the chadwick is carven then they see the crysta. If someone disown the crysta and the crysta nose the chadwick then they eat the crysta. If someone is searching and they eat the chadwick then the chadwick endanger the crysta. If someone nose the crysta then they visit the crysta. If someone is searching then they see the crysta. If someone disown the crysta and the crysta endanger the chadwick then they are searching. If someone endanger the chadwick and the chadwick endanger the crysta then the crysta endanger the chadwick. The crysta is searching.", "logic": "\nEndanger(chadwick, crysta)\nSearching(chadwick)\nAnnoyed(chadwick)\nCardboard(chadwick)\nCarven(chadwick)\nFetal(chadwick)\nNose(chadwick, crysta)\nDisown(chadwick, crysta)\nEndanger(crysta, chadwick)\nSearching(crysta)\nAnnoyed(crysta)\nCardboard(crysta)\nCarven(crysta)\nFetal(crysta)\nNose(crysta, chadwick)\nDisown(crysta, chadwick)\nforall x (Nose(x, crysta) and Disown(x, chadwick) -> Nose(chadwick, crysta))\nforall x (Nose(x, chadwick) and Carven(chadwick) -> Nose(x, crysta))\nforall x (Disown(x, crysta) and Nose(crysta, chadwick) -> Endanger(x, crysta))\nforall x (Searching(x) and Endanger(x, chadwick) -> Endanger(chadwick, crysta))\nforall x (Nose(x, crysta) -> Disown(x, crysta))\nforall x (Searching(x) -> Nose(x, crysta))\nforall x (Disown(x, crysta) and Endanger(crysta, chadwick) -> Searching(x))\nforall x (Endanger(x, chadwick) and Endanger(chadwick, crysta) -> Endanger(crysta, chadwick))\n\nSearching(crysta)\n\ntherefore Searching(crysta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The nevil stock the winnie. The nevil is effective. The nevil is farther. The nevil is primitive. The nevil is sharpened. The nevil is unhygienic. The nevil misdeliver the winnie. The nevil whitewash the winnie. The winnie stock the nevil. The winnie is effective. The winnie is farther. The winnie is primitive. The winnie is sharpened. The winnie is unhygienic. The winnie misdeliver the nevil. The winnie whitewash the nevil. If someone misdeliver the winnie and they visit the nevil then the nevil misdeliver the winnie. If someone misdeliver the nevil and the nevil is sharpened then they see the winnie. If someone whitewash the winnie and the winnie misdeliver the nevil then they eat the winnie. If someone is effective and they eat the nevil then the nevil stock the winnie. If someone misdeliver the winnie then they visit the winnie. If someone is effective then they see the winnie. If someone whitewash the winnie and the winnie stock the nevil then they are effective. If someone stock the nevil and the nevil stock the winnie then the winnie stock the nevil. The winnie does not eat the nevil.", "logic": "\nStock(nevil, winnie)\nEffective(nevil)\nFarther(nevil)\nPrimitive(nevil)\nSharpened(nevil)\nUnhygienic(nevil)\nMisdeliver(nevil, winnie)\nWhitewash(nevil, winnie)\nStock(winnie, nevil)\nEffective(winnie)\nFarther(winnie)\nPrimitive(winnie)\nSharpened(winnie)\nUnhygienic(winnie)\nMisdeliver(winnie, nevil)\nWhitewash(winnie, nevil)\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, winnie) and Whitewash(x, nevil) -> Misdeliver(nevil, winnie))\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, nevil) and Sharpened(nevil) -> Misdeliver(x, winnie))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, winnie) and Misdeliver(winnie, nevil) -> Stock(x, winnie))\nforall x (Effective(x) and Stock(x, nevil) -> Stock(nevil, winnie))\nforall x (Misdeliver(x, winnie) -> Whitewash(x, winnie))\nforall x (Effective(x) -> Misdeliver(x, winnie))\nforall x (Whitewash(x, winnie) and Stock(winnie, nevil) -> Effective(x))\nforall x (Stock(x, nevil) and Stock(nevil, winnie) -> Stock(winnie, nevil))\n\nnot Stock(winnie, nevil)\n\ntherefore Stock(winnie, nevil)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The zola foot the cristy. The zola is corinthian. The zola is canadian. The zola is archean. The zola is caprine. The zola is shaggy. The zola interject the cristy. The zola pitchfork the cristy. The cristy foot the zola. The cristy is corinthian. The cristy is canadian. The cristy is archean. The cristy is caprine. The cristy is shaggy. The cristy interject the zola. The cristy pitchfork the zola. If someone interject the cristy and they visit the zola then the zola interject the cristy. If someone interject the zola and the zola is caprine then they see the cristy. If someone pitchfork the cristy and the cristy interject the zola then they eat the cristy. If someone is corinthian and they eat the zola then the zola foot the cristy. If someone interject the cristy then they visit the cristy. If someone is corinthian then they see the cristy. If someone pitchfork the cristy and the cristy foot the zola then they are corinthian. If someone foot the zola and the zola foot the cristy then the cristy foot the zola. The cristy interject the cristy.", "logic": "\nFoot(zola, cristy)\nCorinthian(zola)\nCanadian(zola)\nArchean(zola)\nCaprine(zola)\nShaggy(zola)\nInterject(zola, cristy)\nPitchfork(zola, cristy)\nFoot(cristy, zola)\nCorinthian(cristy)\nCanadian(cristy)\nArchean(cristy)\nCaprine(cristy)\nShaggy(cristy)\nInterject(cristy, zola)\nPitchfork(cristy, zola)\nforall x (Interject(x, cristy) and Pitchfork(x, zola) -> Interject(zola, cristy))\nforall x (Interject(x, zola) and Caprine(zola) -> Interject(x, cristy))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, cristy) and Interject(cristy, zola) -> Foot(x, cristy))\nforall x (Corinthian(x) and Foot(x, zola) -> Foot(zola, cristy))\nforall x (Interject(x, cristy) -> Pitchfork(x, cristy))\nforall x (Corinthian(x) -> Interject(x, cristy))\nforall x (Pitchfork(x, cristy) and Foot(cristy, zola) -> Corinthian(x))\nforall x (Foot(x, zola) and Foot(zola, cristy) -> Foot(cristy, zola))\n\nInterject(cristy, cristy)\n\nCorinthian(cristy) and forall x (Corinthian(x) -> Interject(x, cristy)) -> therefore Interject(cristy, cristy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The goddard strap the tine. The goddard is quack. The goddard is bromic. The goddard is fatless. The goddard is odorous. The goddard is lossless. The goddard shinny the tine. The goddard nerve the tine. The tine strap the goddard. The tine is quack. The tine is bromic. The tine is fatless. The tine is odorous. The tine is lossless. The tine shinny the goddard. The tine nerve the goddard. If someone shinny the tine and they visit the goddard then the goddard shinny the tine. If someone shinny the goddard and the goddard is odorous then they see the tine. If someone nerve the tine and the tine shinny the goddard then they eat the tine. If someone is quack and they eat the goddard then the goddard strap the tine. If someone shinny the tine then they visit the tine. If someone is quack then they see the tine. If someone nerve the tine and the tine strap the goddard then they are quack. If someone strap the goddard and the goddard strap the tine then the tine strap the goddard. The tine does not see the tine.", "logic": "\nStrap(goddard, tine)\nQuack(goddard)\nBromic(goddard)\nFatless(goddard)\nOdorous(goddard)\nLossless(goddard)\nShinny(goddard, tine)\nNerve(goddard, tine)\nStrap(tine, goddard)\nQuack(tine)\nBromic(tine)\nFatless(tine)\nOdorous(tine)\nLossless(tine)\nShinny(tine, goddard)\nNerve(tine, goddard)\nforall x (Shinny(x, tine) and Nerve(x, goddard) -> Shinny(goddard, tine))\nforall x (Shinny(x, goddard) and Odorous(goddard) -> Shinny(x, tine))\nforall x (Nerve(x, tine) and Shinny(tine, goddard) -> Strap(x, tine))\nforall x (Quack(x) and Strap(x, goddard) -> Strap(goddard, tine))\nforall x (Shinny(x, tine) -> Nerve(x, tine))\nforall x (Quack(x) -> Shinny(x, tine))\nforall x (Nerve(x, tine) and Strap(tine, goddard) -> Quack(x))\nforall x (Strap(x, goddard) and Strap(goddard, tine) -> Strap(tine, goddard))\n\nnot Shinny(tine, tine)\n\nQuack(tine) and forall x (Quack(x) -> Shinny(x, tine)) -> therefore Shinny(tine, tine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The melvin dine the worden. The melvin is inerrant. The melvin is allowable. The melvin is drenched. The melvin is chargeable. The melvin is christian. The melvin reevaluate the worden. The melvin yodel the worden. The worden dine the melvin. The worden is inerrant. The worden is allowable. The worden is drenched. The worden is chargeable. The worden is christian. The worden reevaluate the melvin. The worden yodel the melvin. If someone reevaluate the worden and they visit the melvin then the melvin reevaluate the worden. If someone reevaluate the melvin and the melvin is chargeable then they see the worden. If someone yodel the worden and the worden reevaluate the melvin then they eat the worden. If someone is inerrant and they eat the melvin then the melvin dine the worden. If someone reevaluate the worden then they visit the worden. If someone is inerrant then they see the worden. If someone yodel the worden and the worden dine the melvin then they are inerrant. If someone dine the melvin and the melvin dine the worden then the worden dine the melvin. The worden yodel the worden.", "logic": "\nDine(melvin, worden)\nInerrant(melvin)\nAllowable(melvin)\nDrenched(melvin)\nChargeable(melvin)\nChristian(melvin)\nReevaluate(melvin, worden)\nYodel(melvin, worden)\nDine(worden, melvin)\nInerrant(worden)\nAllowable(worden)\nDrenched(worden)\nChargeable(worden)\nChristian(worden)\nReevaluate(worden, melvin)\nYodel(worden, melvin)\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, worden) and Yodel(x, melvin) -> Reevaluate(melvin, worden))\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, melvin) and Chargeable(melvin) -> Reevaluate(x, worden))\nforall x (Yodel(x, worden) and Reevaluate(worden, melvin) -> Dine(x, worden))\nforall x (Inerrant(x) and Dine(x, melvin) -> Dine(melvin, worden))\nforall x (Reevaluate(x, worden) -> Yodel(x, worden))\nforall x (Inerrant(x) -> Reevaluate(x, worden))\nforall x (Yodel(x, worden) and Dine(worden, melvin) -> Inerrant(x))\nforall x (Dine(x, melvin) and Dine(melvin, worden) -> Dine(worden, melvin))\n\nYodel(worden, worden)\n\nInerrant(worden) and forall x (Inerrant(x) -> Reevaluate(x, worden)) -> therefore Reevaluate(worden, worden) Reevaluate(worden, worden) and forall x (Reevaluate(x, worden) -> Yodel(x, worden)) -> therefore Yodel(worden, worden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The avrit beckon the liz. The avrit is clubable. The avrit is correct. The avrit is impeding. The avrit is zygodactyl. The avrit is spattered. The avrit give the liz. The avrit intromit the liz. The liz beckon the avrit. The liz is clubable. The liz is correct. The liz is impeding. The liz is zygodactyl. The liz is spattered. The liz give the avrit. The liz intromit the avrit. If someone give the liz and they visit the avrit then the avrit give the liz. If someone give the avrit and the avrit is zygodactyl then they see the liz. If someone intromit the liz and the liz give the avrit then they eat the liz. If someone is clubable and they eat the avrit then the avrit beckon the liz. If someone give the liz then they visit the liz. If someone is clubable then they see the liz. If someone intromit the liz and the liz beckon the avrit then they are clubable. If someone beckon the avrit and the avrit beckon the liz then the liz beckon the avrit. The liz does not visit the liz.", "logic": "\nBeckon(avrit, liz)\nClubable(avrit)\nCorrect(avrit)\nImpeding(avrit)\nZygodactyl(avrit)\nSpattered(avrit)\nGive(avrit, liz)\nIntromit(avrit, liz)\nBeckon(liz, avrit)\nClubable(liz)\nCorrect(liz)\nImpeding(liz)\nZygodactyl(liz)\nSpattered(liz)\nGive(liz, avrit)\nIntromit(liz, avrit)\nforall x (Give(x, liz) and Intromit(x, avrit) -> Give(avrit, liz))\nforall x (Give(x, avrit) and Zygodactyl(avrit) -> Give(x, liz))\nforall x (Intromit(x, liz) and Give(liz, avrit) -> Beckon(x, liz))\nforall x (Clubable(x) and Beckon(x, avrit) -> Beckon(avrit, liz))\nforall x (Give(x, liz) -> Intromit(x, liz))\nforall x (Clubable(x) -> Give(x, liz))\nforall x (Intromit(x, liz) and Beckon(liz, avrit) -> Clubable(x))\nforall x (Beckon(x, avrit) and Beckon(avrit, liz) -> Beckon(liz, avrit))\n\nnot Intromit(liz, liz)\n\nClubable(liz) and forall x (Clubable(x) -> Give(x, liz)) -> therefore Give(liz, liz) Give(liz, liz) and forall x (Give(x, liz) -> Intromit(x, liz)) -> therefore Intromit(liz, liz)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The larisa seep the sharia. The larisa is incipient. The larisa is lenitive. The larisa is deskbound. The larisa is vendable. The larisa is nonnatural. The larisa undeceive the sharia. The larisa ticket the sharia. The sharia seep the larisa. The sharia is incipient. The sharia is lenitive. The sharia is deskbound. The sharia is vendable. The sharia is nonnatural. The sharia undeceive the larisa. The sharia ticket the larisa. If someone undeceive the sharia and they visit the larisa then the larisa undeceive the sharia. If someone undeceive the larisa and the larisa is vendable then they see the sharia. If someone ticket the sharia and the sharia undeceive the larisa then they eat the sharia. If someone is incipient and they eat the larisa then the larisa seep the sharia. If someone undeceive the sharia then they visit the sharia. If someone is incipient then they see the sharia. If someone ticket the sharia and the sharia seep the larisa then they are incipient. If someone seep the larisa and the larisa seep the sharia then the sharia seep the larisa. The sharia seep the sharia.", "logic": "\nSeep(larisa, sharia)\nIncipient(larisa)\nLenitive(larisa)\nDeskbound(larisa)\nVendable(larisa)\nNonnatural(larisa)\nUndeceive(larisa, sharia)\nTicket(larisa, sharia)\nSeep(sharia, larisa)\nIncipient(sharia)\nLenitive(sharia)\nDeskbound(sharia)\nVendable(sharia)\nNonnatural(sharia)\nUndeceive(sharia, larisa)\nTicket(sharia, larisa)\nforall x (Undeceive(x, sharia) and Ticket(x, larisa) -> Undeceive(larisa, sharia))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, larisa) and Vendable(larisa) -> Undeceive(x, sharia))\nforall x (Ticket(x, sharia) and Undeceive(sharia, larisa) -> Seep(x, sharia))\nforall x (Incipient(x) and Seep(x, larisa) -> Seep(larisa, sharia))\nforall x (Undeceive(x, sharia) -> Ticket(x, sharia))\nforall x (Incipient(x) -> Undeceive(x, sharia))\nforall x (Ticket(x, sharia) and Seep(sharia, larisa) -> Incipient(x))\nforall x (Seep(x, larisa) and Seep(larisa, sharia) -> Seep(sharia, larisa))\n\nSeep(sharia, sharia)\n\nIncipient(sharia) and forall x (Incipient(x) -> Undeceive(x, sharia)) -> therefore Undeceive(sharia, sharia) Undeceive(sharia, sharia) and forall x (Undeceive(x, sharia) -> Ticket(x, sharia)) -> therefore Ticket(sharia, sharia) Ticket(sharia, sharia) and Undeceive(sharia, larisa) and forall x (Ticket(x, sharia) and Undeceive(sharia, larisa) -> Seep(x, sharia)) -> therefore Seep(sharia, sharia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The poul impend the ewart. The poul is avestan. The poul is edwardian. The poul is passee. The poul is smokeless. The poul is rapid. The poul belabor the ewart. The poul caparison the ewart. The ewart impend the poul. The ewart is avestan. The ewart is edwardian. The ewart is passee. The ewart is smokeless. The ewart is rapid. The ewart belabor the poul. The ewart caparison the poul. If someone belabor the ewart and they visit the poul then the poul belabor the ewart. If someone belabor the poul and the poul is smokeless then they see the ewart. If someone caparison the ewart and the ewart belabor the poul then they eat the ewart. If someone is avestan and they eat the poul then the poul impend the ewart. If someone belabor the ewart then they visit the ewart. If someone is avestan then they see the ewart. If someone caparison the ewart and the ewart impend the poul then they are avestan. If someone impend the poul and the poul impend the ewart then the ewart impend the poul. The ewart does not eat the ewart.", "logic": "\nImpend(poul, ewart)\nAvestan(poul)\nEdwardian(poul)\nPassee(poul)\nSmokeless(poul)\nRapid(poul)\nBelabor(poul, ewart)\nCaparison(poul, ewart)\nImpend(ewart, poul)\nAvestan(ewart)\nEdwardian(ewart)\nPassee(ewart)\nSmokeless(ewart)\nRapid(ewart)\nBelabor(ewart, poul)\nCaparison(ewart, poul)\nforall x (Belabor(x, ewart) and Caparison(x, poul) -> Belabor(poul, ewart))\nforall x (Belabor(x, poul) and Smokeless(poul) -> Belabor(x, ewart))\nforall x (Caparison(x, ewart) and Belabor(ewart, poul) -> Impend(x, ewart))\nforall x (Avestan(x) and Impend(x, poul) -> Impend(poul, ewart))\nforall x (Belabor(x, ewart) -> Caparison(x, ewart))\nforall x (Avestan(x) -> Belabor(x, ewart))\nforall x (Caparison(x, ewart) and Impend(ewart, poul) -> Avestan(x))\nforall x (Impend(x, poul) and Impend(poul, ewart) -> Impend(ewart, poul))\n\nnot Impend(ewart, ewart)\n\nAvestan(ewart) and forall x (Avestan(x) -> Belabor(x, ewart)) -> therefore Belabor(ewart, ewart) Belabor(ewart, ewart) and forall x (Belabor(x, ewart) -> Caparison(x, ewart)) -> therefore Caparison(ewart, ewart) Caparison(ewart, ewart) and Belabor(ewart, poul) and forall x (Caparison(x, ewart) and Belabor(ewart, poul) -> Impend(x, ewart)) -> therefore Impend(ewart, ewart)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The lizabeth rouge the rorie. The lizabeth is redbrick. The lizabeth is personable. The lizabeth is dreadful. The lizabeth is southward. The lizabeth is pyramidic. The lizabeth garnishee the rorie. The lizabeth tumesce the rorie. The rorie rouge the lizabeth. The rorie is redbrick. The rorie is personable. The rorie is dreadful. The rorie is southward. The rorie is pyramidic. The rorie garnishee the lizabeth. The rorie tumesce the lizabeth. If someone garnishee the rorie and they visit the lizabeth then the lizabeth garnishee the rorie. If someone garnishee the lizabeth and the lizabeth is southward then they see the rorie. If someone tumesce the rorie and the rorie garnishee the lizabeth then they eat the rorie. If someone is redbrick and they eat the lizabeth then the lizabeth rouge the rorie. If someone garnishee the rorie then they visit the rorie. If someone is redbrick then they see the rorie. If someone tumesce the rorie and the rorie rouge the lizabeth then they are redbrick. If someone rouge the lizabeth and the lizabeth rouge the rorie then the rorie rouge the lizabeth. The lizabeth does not eat the lizabeth.", "logic": "\nRouge(lizabeth, rorie)\nRedbrick(lizabeth)\nPersonable(lizabeth)\nDreadful(lizabeth)\nSouthward(lizabeth)\nPyramidic(lizabeth)\nGarnishee(lizabeth, rorie)\nTumesce(lizabeth, rorie)\nRouge(rorie, lizabeth)\nRedbrick(rorie)\nPersonable(rorie)\nDreadful(rorie)\nSouthward(rorie)\nPyramidic(rorie)\nGarnishee(rorie, lizabeth)\nTumesce(rorie, lizabeth)\nforall x (Garnishee(x, rorie) and Tumesce(x, lizabeth) -> Garnishee(lizabeth, rorie))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, lizabeth) and Southward(lizabeth) -> Garnishee(x, rorie))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, rorie) and Garnishee(rorie, lizabeth) -> Rouge(x, rorie))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) and Rouge(x, lizabeth) -> Rouge(lizabeth, rorie))\nforall x (Garnishee(x, rorie) -> Tumesce(x, rorie))\nforall x (Redbrick(x) -> Garnishee(x, rorie))\nforall x (Tumesce(x, rorie) and Rouge(rorie, lizabeth) -> Redbrick(x))\nforall x (Rouge(x, lizabeth) and Rouge(lizabeth, rorie) -> Rouge(rorie, lizabeth))\n\nnot Rouge(lizabeth, lizabeth)\n\nnot Rouge(lizabeth, lizabeth) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The mandy bash the joell. The mandy is unipolar. The mandy is divisive. The mandy is adaptative. The mandy is pragmatic. The mandy is consecrate. The mandy script the joell. The mandy rear the joell. The joell bash the mandy. The joell is unipolar. The joell is divisive. The joell is adaptative. The joell is pragmatic. The joell is consecrate. The joell script the mandy. The joell rear the mandy. If someone script the joell and they visit the mandy then the mandy script the joell. If someone script the mandy and the mandy is pragmatic then they see the joell. If someone rear the joell and the joell script the mandy then they eat the joell. If someone is unipolar and they eat the mandy then the mandy bash the joell. If someone script the joell then they visit the joell. If someone is unipolar then they see the joell. If someone rear the joell and the joell bash the mandy then they are unipolar. If someone bash the mandy and the mandy bash the joell then the joell bash the mandy. The mandy rear the mandy.", "logic": "\nBash(mandy, joell)\nUnipolar(mandy)\nDivisive(mandy)\nAdaptative(mandy)\nPragmatic(mandy)\nConsecrate(mandy)\nScript(mandy, joell)\nRear(mandy, joell)\nBash(joell, mandy)\nUnipolar(joell)\nDivisive(joell)\nAdaptative(joell)\nPragmatic(joell)\nConsecrate(joell)\nScript(joell, mandy)\nRear(joell, mandy)\nforall x (Script(x, joell) and Rear(x, mandy) -> Script(mandy, joell))\nforall x (Script(x, mandy) and Pragmatic(mandy) -> Script(x, joell))\nforall x (Rear(x, joell) and Script(joell, mandy) -> Bash(x, joell))\nforall x (Unipolar(x) and Bash(x, mandy) -> Bash(mandy, joell))\nforall x (Script(x, joell) -> Rear(x, joell))\nforall x (Unipolar(x) -> Script(x, joell))\nforall x (Rear(x, joell) and Bash(joell, mandy) -> Unipolar(x))\nforall x (Bash(x, mandy) and Bash(mandy, joell) -> Bash(joell, mandy))\n\nRear(mandy, mandy)\n\nRear(mandy, mandy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-925"} {"premises": "The archie is podgy. The archie is walking. The archie is bombastic. The archie blare the daniela. The archie annihilate the daniela. The archie does not visit the daniela. The daniela is marbleized. The daniela is podgy. The daniela is not combinable. The daniela blare the archie. The daniela annihilate the archie. The daniela discourage the archie. If someone discourage the archie and they are not combinable then the archie blare the daniela. If someone is bombastic then they like the archie. If someone is walking then they visit the archie. If someone annihilate the archie then they are marbleized. If someone discourage the daniela and the daniela blare the archie then the daniela annihilate the archie. If someone discourage the archie and they are bombastic then they see the archie. If someone is combinable then they do not see the archie. If the daniela discourage the archie and the daniela does not see the archie then the archie is podgy. The daniela blare the archie.", "logic": "\nPodgy(archie)\nWalking(archie)\nBombastic(archie)\nBlare(archie, daniela)\nAnnihilate(archie, daniela)\nnot Discourage(archie, daniela)\nMarbleized(daniela)\nPodgy(daniela)\nnot Combinable(daniela)\nBlare(daniela, archie)\nAnnihilate(daniela, archie)\nDiscourage(daniela, archie)\nforall x (Discourage(x, archie) and not Combinable(x) -> Blare(archie, daniela))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Blare(x, archie))\nforall x (Walking(x) -> Discourage(x, archie))\nforall x (Annihilate(x, archie) -> Marbleized(x))\nforall x (Discourage(x, daniela) and Blare(daniela, archie) -> Annihilate(daniela, archie))\nforall x (Discourage(x, archie) and Bombastic(x) -> Annihilate(x, archie))\nforall x (Combinable(x) -> not Annihilate(x, archie))\nDiscourage(daniela, archie) and not Annihilate(daniela, archie) -> Podgy(archie)\n\nBlare(daniela, archie)\n\ntherefore Blare(daniela, archie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The stearn is suntanned. The stearn is gemmed. The stearn is pettish. The stearn medicine the kameko. The stearn burl the kameko. The stearn does not visit the kameko. The kameko is blasting. The kameko is suntanned. The kameko is not mesial. The kameko medicine the stearn. The kameko burl the stearn. The kameko outfight the stearn. If someone outfight the stearn and they are not mesial then the stearn medicine the kameko. If someone is pettish then they like the stearn. If someone is gemmed then they visit the stearn. If someone burl the stearn then they are blasting. If someone outfight the kameko and the kameko medicine the stearn then the kameko burl the stearn. If someone outfight the stearn and they are pettish then they see the stearn. If someone is mesial then they do not see the stearn. If the kameko outfight the stearn and the kameko does not see the stearn then the stearn is suntanned. The kameko is mesial.", "logic": "\nSuntanned(stearn)\nGemmed(stearn)\nPettish(stearn)\nMedicine(stearn, kameko)\nBurl(stearn, kameko)\nnot Outfight(stearn, kameko)\nBlasting(kameko)\nSuntanned(kameko)\nnot Mesial(kameko)\nMedicine(kameko, stearn)\nBurl(kameko, stearn)\nOutfight(kameko, stearn)\nforall x (Outfight(x, stearn) and not Mesial(x) -> Medicine(stearn, kameko))\nforall x (Pettish(x) -> Medicine(x, stearn))\nforall x (Gemmed(x) -> Outfight(x, stearn))\nforall x (Burl(x, stearn) -> Blasting(x))\nforall x (Outfight(x, kameko) and Medicine(kameko, stearn) -> Burl(kameko, stearn))\nforall x (Outfight(x, stearn) and Pettish(x) -> Burl(x, stearn))\nforall x (Mesial(x) -> not Burl(x, stearn))\nOutfight(kameko, stearn) and not Burl(kameko, stearn) -> Suntanned(stearn)\n\nMesial(kameko)\n\ntherefore not Mesial(kameko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The donni is burly. The donni is maximum. The donni is unproven. The donni overtop the mommy. The donni rubberize the mommy. The donni does not visit the mommy. The mommy is arboriform. The mommy is burly. The mommy is not amber. The mommy overtop the donni. The mommy rubberize the donni. The mommy junketeer the donni. If someone junketeer the donni and they are not amber then the donni overtop the mommy. If someone is unproven then they like the donni. If someone is maximum then they visit the donni. If someone rubberize the donni then they are arboriform. If someone junketeer the mommy and the mommy overtop the donni then the mommy rubberize the donni. If someone junketeer the donni and they are unproven then they see the donni. If someone is amber then they do not see the donni. If the mommy junketeer the donni and the mommy does not see the donni then the donni is burly. The donni overtop the donni.", "logic": "\nBurly(donni)\nMaximum(donni)\nUnproven(donni)\nOvertop(donni, mommy)\nRubberize(donni, mommy)\nnot Junketeer(donni, mommy)\nArboriform(mommy)\nBurly(mommy)\nnot Amber(mommy)\nOvertop(mommy, donni)\nRubberize(mommy, donni)\nJunketeer(mommy, donni)\nforall x (Junketeer(x, donni) and not Amber(x) -> Overtop(donni, mommy))\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Overtop(x, donni))\nforall x (Maximum(x) -> Junketeer(x, donni))\nforall x (Rubberize(x, donni) -> Arboriform(x))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, mommy) and Overtop(mommy, donni) -> Rubberize(mommy, donni))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, donni) and Unproven(x) -> Rubberize(x, donni))\nforall x (Amber(x) -> not Rubberize(x, donni))\nJunketeer(mommy, donni) and not Rubberize(mommy, donni) -> Burly(donni)\n\nOvertop(donni, donni)\n\nUnproven(donni) and forall x (Unproven(x) -> Overtop(x, donni)) -> therefore Overtop(donni, donni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The stacee is thawed. The stacee is unwearying. The stacee is bonny. The stacee evince the cindi. The stacee spear the cindi. The stacee does not visit the cindi. The cindi is snobby. The cindi is thawed. The cindi is not wrecked. The cindi evince the stacee. The cindi spear the stacee. The cindi preside the stacee. If someone preside the stacee and they are not wrecked then the stacee evince the cindi. If someone is bonny then they like the stacee. If someone is unwearying then they visit the stacee. If someone spear the stacee then they are snobby. If someone preside the cindi and the cindi evince the stacee then the cindi spear the stacee. If someone preside the stacee and they are bonny then they see the stacee. If someone is wrecked then they do not see the stacee. If the cindi preside the stacee and the cindi does not see the stacee then the stacee is thawed. The stacee does not visit the stacee.", "logic": "\nThawed(stacee)\nUnwearying(stacee)\nBonny(stacee)\nEvince(stacee, cindi)\nSpear(stacee, cindi)\nnot Preside(stacee, cindi)\nSnobby(cindi)\nThawed(cindi)\nnot Wrecked(cindi)\nEvince(cindi, stacee)\nSpear(cindi, stacee)\nPreside(cindi, stacee)\nforall x (Preside(x, stacee) and not Wrecked(x) -> Evince(stacee, cindi))\nforall x (Bonny(x) -> Evince(x, stacee))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) -> Preside(x, stacee))\nforall x (Spear(x, stacee) -> Snobby(x))\nforall x (Preside(x, cindi) and Evince(cindi, stacee) -> Spear(cindi, stacee))\nforall x (Preside(x, stacee) and Bonny(x) -> Spear(x, stacee))\nforall x (Wrecked(x) -> not Spear(x, stacee))\nPreside(cindi, stacee) and not Spear(cindi, stacee) -> Thawed(stacee)\n\nnot Preside(stacee, stacee)\n\nUnwearying(stacee) and forall x (Unwearying(x) -> Preside(x, stacee)) -> therefore Preside(stacee, stacee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The aprilette is unattended. The aprilette is unabashed. The aprilette is broadband. The aprilette hood the adoree. The aprilette gutter the adoree. The aprilette does not visit the adoree. The adoree is mithraic. The adoree is unattended. The adoree is not enwrapped. The adoree hood the aprilette. The adoree gutter the aprilette. The adoree gawk the aprilette. If someone gawk the aprilette and they are not enwrapped then the aprilette hood the adoree. If someone is broadband then they like the aprilette. If someone is unabashed then they visit the aprilette. If someone gutter the aprilette then they are mithraic. If someone gawk the adoree and the adoree hood the aprilette then the adoree gutter the aprilette. If someone gawk the aprilette and they are broadband then they see the aprilette. If someone is enwrapped then they do not see the aprilette. If the adoree gawk the aprilette and the adoree does not see the aprilette then the aprilette is unattended. The aprilette gutter the aprilette.", "logic": "\nUnattended(aprilette)\nUnabashed(aprilette)\nBroadband(aprilette)\nHood(aprilette, adoree)\nGutter(aprilette, adoree)\nnot Gawk(aprilette, adoree)\nMithraic(adoree)\nUnattended(adoree)\nnot Enwrapped(adoree)\nHood(adoree, aprilette)\nGutter(adoree, aprilette)\nGawk(adoree, aprilette)\nforall x (Gawk(x, aprilette) and not Enwrapped(x) -> Hood(aprilette, adoree))\nforall x (Broadband(x) -> Hood(x, aprilette))\nforall x (Unabashed(x) -> Gawk(x, aprilette))\nforall x (Gutter(x, aprilette) -> Mithraic(x))\nforall x (Gawk(x, adoree) and Hood(adoree, aprilette) -> Gutter(adoree, aprilette))\nforall x (Gawk(x, aprilette) and Broadband(x) -> Gutter(x, aprilette))\nforall x (Enwrapped(x) -> not Gutter(x, aprilette))\nGawk(adoree, aprilette) and not Gutter(adoree, aprilette) -> Unattended(aprilette)\n\nGutter(aprilette, aprilette)\n\nUnabashed(aprilette) and forall x (Unabashed(x) -> Gawk(x, aprilette)) -> therefore Gawk(aprilette, aprilette) Gawk(aprilette, aprilette) and Broadband(aprilette) and forall x (Gawk(x, aprilette) and Broadband(x) -> Gutter(x, aprilette)) -> therefore Gutter(aprilette, aprilette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The tillie is mesolithic. The tillie is erroneous. The tillie is impure. The tillie backlog the timi. The tillie speckle the timi. The tillie does not visit the timi. The timi is breakaway. The timi is mesolithic. The timi is not pitiful. The timi backlog the tillie. The timi speckle the tillie. The timi tweeze the tillie. If someone tweeze the tillie and they are not pitiful then the tillie backlog the timi. If someone is impure then they like the tillie. If someone is erroneous then they visit the tillie. If someone speckle the tillie then they are breakaway. If someone tweeze the timi and the timi backlog the tillie then the timi speckle the tillie. If someone tweeze the tillie and they are impure then they see the tillie. If someone is pitiful then they do not see the tillie. If the timi tweeze the tillie and the timi does not see the tillie then the tillie is mesolithic. The tillie does not see the tillie.", "logic": "\nMesolithic(tillie)\nErroneous(tillie)\nImpure(tillie)\nBacklog(tillie, timi)\nSpeckle(tillie, timi)\nnot Tweeze(tillie, timi)\nBreakaway(timi)\nMesolithic(timi)\nnot Pitiful(timi)\nBacklog(timi, tillie)\nSpeckle(timi, tillie)\nTweeze(timi, tillie)\nforall x (Tweeze(x, tillie) and not Pitiful(x) -> Backlog(tillie, timi))\nforall x (Impure(x) -> Backlog(x, tillie))\nforall x (Erroneous(x) -> Tweeze(x, tillie))\nforall x (Speckle(x, tillie) -> Breakaway(x))\nforall x (Tweeze(x, timi) and Backlog(timi, tillie) -> Speckle(timi, tillie))\nforall x (Tweeze(x, tillie) and Impure(x) -> Speckle(x, tillie))\nforall x (Pitiful(x) -> not Speckle(x, tillie))\nTweeze(timi, tillie) and not Speckle(timi, tillie) -> Mesolithic(tillie)\n\nnot Speckle(tillie, tillie)\n\nErroneous(tillie) and forall x (Erroneous(x) -> Tweeze(x, tillie)) -> therefore Tweeze(tillie, tillie) Tweeze(tillie, tillie) and Impure(tillie) and forall x (Tweeze(x, tillie) and Impure(x) -> Speckle(x, tillie)) -> therefore Speckle(tillie, tillie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The ulrike is jutting. The ulrike is grudging. The ulrike is gasified. The ulrike depolarise the martita. The ulrike lobby the martita. The ulrike does not visit the martita. The martita is faultless. The martita is jutting. The martita is not limbless. The martita depolarise the ulrike. The martita lobby the ulrike. The martita deny the ulrike. If someone deny the ulrike and they are not limbless then the ulrike depolarise the martita. If someone is gasified then they like the ulrike. If someone is grudging then they visit the ulrike. If someone lobby the ulrike then they are faultless. If someone deny the martita and the martita depolarise the ulrike then the martita lobby the ulrike. If someone deny the ulrike and they are gasified then they see the ulrike. If someone is limbless then they do not see the ulrike. If the martita deny the ulrike and the martita does not see the ulrike then the ulrike is jutting. The ulrike is faultless.", "logic": "\nJutting(ulrike)\nGrudging(ulrike)\nGasified(ulrike)\nDepolarise(ulrike, martita)\nLobby(ulrike, martita)\nnot Deny(ulrike, martita)\nFaultless(martita)\nJutting(martita)\nnot Limbless(martita)\nDepolarise(martita, ulrike)\nLobby(martita, ulrike)\nDeny(martita, ulrike)\nforall x (Deny(x, ulrike) and not Limbless(x) -> Depolarise(ulrike, martita))\nforall x (Gasified(x) -> Depolarise(x, ulrike))\nforall x (Grudging(x) -> Deny(x, ulrike))\nforall x (Lobby(x, ulrike) -> Faultless(x))\nforall x (Deny(x, martita) and Depolarise(martita, ulrike) -> Lobby(martita, ulrike))\nforall x (Deny(x, ulrike) and Gasified(x) -> Lobby(x, ulrike))\nforall x (Limbless(x) -> not Lobby(x, ulrike))\nDeny(martita, ulrike) and not Lobby(martita, ulrike) -> Jutting(ulrike)\n\nFaultless(ulrike)\n\nGrudging(ulrike) and forall x (Grudging(x) -> Deny(x, ulrike)) -> therefore Deny(ulrike, ulrike) Deny(ulrike, ulrike) and Gasified(ulrike) and forall x (Deny(x, ulrike) and Gasified(x) -> Lobby(x, ulrike)) -> therefore Lobby(ulrike, ulrike) Lobby(ulrike, ulrike) and forall x (Lobby(x, ulrike) -> Faultless(x)) -> therefore Faultless(ulrike)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The willy is northmost. The willy is cenozoic. The willy is postal. The willy linearise the trish. The willy dehumanise the trish. The willy does not visit the trish. The trish is leechlike. The trish is northmost. The trish is not brattish. The trish linearise the willy. The trish dehumanise the willy. The trish cash the willy. If someone cash the willy and they are not brattish then the willy linearise the trish. If someone is postal then they like the willy. If someone is cenozoic then they visit the willy. If someone dehumanise the willy then they are leechlike. If someone cash the trish and the trish linearise the willy then the trish dehumanise the willy. If someone cash the willy and they are postal then they see the willy. If someone is brattish then they do not see the willy. If the trish cash the willy and the trish does not see the willy then the willy is northmost. The willy is not leechlike.", "logic": "\nNorthmost(willy)\nCenozoic(willy)\nPostal(willy)\nLinearise(willy, trish)\nDehumanise(willy, trish)\nnot Cash(willy, trish)\nLeechlike(trish)\nNorthmost(trish)\nnot Brattish(trish)\nLinearise(trish, willy)\nDehumanise(trish, willy)\nCash(trish, willy)\nforall x (Cash(x, willy) and not Brattish(x) -> Linearise(willy, trish))\nforall x (Postal(x) -> Linearise(x, willy))\nforall x (Cenozoic(x) -> Cash(x, willy))\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, willy) -> Leechlike(x))\nforall x (Cash(x, trish) and Linearise(trish, willy) -> Dehumanise(trish, willy))\nforall x (Cash(x, willy) and Postal(x) -> Dehumanise(x, willy))\nforall x (Brattish(x) -> not Dehumanise(x, willy))\nCash(trish, willy) and not Dehumanise(trish, willy) -> Northmost(willy)\n\nnot Leechlike(willy)\n\nCenozoic(willy) and forall x (Cenozoic(x) -> Cash(x, willy)) -> therefore Cash(willy, willy) Cash(willy, willy) and Postal(willy) and forall x (Cash(x, willy) and Postal(x) -> Dehumanise(x, willy)) -> therefore Dehumanise(willy, willy) Dehumanise(willy, willy) and forall x (Dehumanise(x, willy) -> Leechlike(x)) -> therefore Leechlike(willy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The nadiya is shady. The nadiya is scrub. The nadiya is unbeholden. The nadiya slime the casia. The nadiya catechise the casia. The nadiya does not visit the casia. The casia is timed. The casia is shady. The casia is not unreal. The casia slime the nadiya. The casia catechise the nadiya. The casia customise the nadiya. If someone customise the nadiya and they are not unreal then the nadiya slime the casia. If someone is unbeholden then they like the nadiya. If someone is scrub then they visit the nadiya. If someone catechise the nadiya then they are timed. If someone customise the casia and the casia slime the nadiya then the casia catechise the nadiya. If someone customise the nadiya and they are unbeholden then they see the nadiya. If someone is unreal then they do not see the nadiya. If the casia customise the nadiya and the casia does not see the nadiya then the nadiya is shady. The casia does not like the casia.", "logic": "\nShady(nadiya)\nScrub(nadiya)\nUnbeholden(nadiya)\nSlime(nadiya, casia)\nCatechise(nadiya, casia)\nnot Customise(nadiya, casia)\nTimed(casia)\nShady(casia)\nnot Unreal(casia)\nSlime(casia, nadiya)\nCatechise(casia, nadiya)\nCustomise(casia, nadiya)\nforall x (Customise(x, nadiya) and not Unreal(x) -> Slime(nadiya, casia))\nforall x (Unbeholden(x) -> Slime(x, nadiya))\nforall x (Scrub(x) -> Customise(x, nadiya))\nforall x (Catechise(x, nadiya) -> Timed(x))\nforall x (Customise(x, casia) and Slime(casia, nadiya) -> Catechise(casia, nadiya))\nforall x (Customise(x, nadiya) and Unbeholden(x) -> Catechise(x, nadiya))\nforall x (Unreal(x) -> not Catechise(x, nadiya))\nCustomise(casia, nadiya) and not Catechise(casia, nadiya) -> Shady(nadiya)\n\nnot Slime(casia, casia)\n\nnot Slime(casia, casia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The flint is azotic. The flint is actuating. The flint is bloodless. The flint litigate the shalna. The flint overdose the shalna. The flint does not visit the shalna. The shalna is monkish. The shalna is azotic. The shalna is not inaudible. The shalna litigate the flint. The shalna overdose the flint. The shalna read the flint. If someone read the flint and they are not inaudible then the flint litigate the shalna. If someone is bloodless then they like the flint. If someone is actuating then they visit the flint. If someone overdose the flint then they are monkish. If someone read the shalna and the shalna litigate the flint then the shalna overdose the flint. If someone read the flint and they are bloodless then they see the flint. If someone is inaudible then they do not see the flint. If the shalna read the flint and the shalna does not see the flint then the flint is azotic. The shalna read the shalna.", "logic": "\nAzotic(flint)\nActuating(flint)\nBloodless(flint)\nLitigate(flint, shalna)\nOverdose(flint, shalna)\nnot Read(flint, shalna)\nMonkish(shalna)\nAzotic(shalna)\nnot Inaudible(shalna)\nLitigate(shalna, flint)\nOverdose(shalna, flint)\nRead(shalna, flint)\nforall x (Read(x, flint) and not Inaudible(x) -> Litigate(flint, shalna))\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Litigate(x, flint))\nforall x (Actuating(x) -> Read(x, flint))\nforall x (Overdose(x, flint) -> Monkish(x))\nforall x (Read(x, shalna) and Litigate(shalna, flint) -> Overdose(shalna, flint))\nforall x (Read(x, flint) and Bloodless(x) -> Overdose(x, flint))\nforall x (Inaudible(x) -> not Overdose(x, flint))\nRead(shalna, flint) and not Overdose(shalna, flint) -> Azotic(flint)\n\nRead(shalna, shalna)\n\nRead(shalna, shalna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The fionnula is matted. The fionnula is prepared. The fionnula is criminal. The fionnula esterify the yolanthe. The fionnula accede the yolanthe. The fionnula does not visit the yolanthe. The yolanthe is unrenewed. The yolanthe is matted. The yolanthe is not cancerous. The yolanthe esterify the fionnula. The yolanthe accede the fionnula. The yolanthe benight the fionnula. If someone benight the fionnula and they are not cancerous then the fionnula esterify the yolanthe. If someone is criminal then they like the fionnula. If someone is prepared then they visit the fionnula. If someone accede the fionnula then they are unrenewed. If someone benight the yolanthe and the yolanthe esterify the fionnula then the yolanthe accede the fionnula. If someone benight the fionnula and they are criminal then they see the fionnula. If someone is cancerous then they do not see the fionnula. If the yolanthe benight the fionnula and the yolanthe does not see the fionnula then the fionnula is matted. The yolanthe does not see the yolanthe.", "logic": "\nMatted(fionnula)\nPrepared(fionnula)\nCriminal(fionnula)\nEsterify(fionnula, yolanthe)\nAccede(fionnula, yolanthe)\nnot Benight(fionnula, yolanthe)\nUnrenewed(yolanthe)\nMatted(yolanthe)\nnot Cancerous(yolanthe)\nEsterify(yolanthe, fionnula)\nAccede(yolanthe, fionnula)\nBenight(yolanthe, fionnula)\nforall x (Benight(x, fionnula) and not Cancerous(x) -> Esterify(fionnula, yolanthe))\nforall x (Criminal(x) -> Esterify(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Prepared(x) -> Benight(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Accede(x, fionnula) -> Unrenewed(x))\nforall x (Benight(x, yolanthe) and Esterify(yolanthe, fionnula) -> Accede(yolanthe, fionnula))\nforall x (Benight(x, fionnula) and Criminal(x) -> Accede(x, fionnula))\nforall x (Cancerous(x) -> not Accede(x, fionnula))\nBenight(yolanthe, fionnula) and not Accede(yolanthe, fionnula) -> Matted(fionnula)\n\nnot Accede(yolanthe, yolanthe)\n\nnot Accede(yolanthe, yolanthe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The feodora is rubberlike. The feodora is maxi. The feodora is acroscopic. The feodora inunct the joellen. The feodora defecate the joellen. The feodora does not visit the joellen. The joellen is slanderous. The joellen is rubberlike. The joellen is not burbling. The joellen inunct the feodora. The joellen defecate the feodora. The joellen jumpstart the feodora. If someone jumpstart the feodora and they are not burbling then the feodora inunct the joellen. If someone is acroscopic then they like the feodora. If someone is maxi then they visit the feodora. If someone defecate the feodora then they are slanderous. If someone jumpstart the joellen and the joellen inunct the feodora then the joellen defecate the feodora. If someone jumpstart the feodora and they are acroscopic then they see the feodora. If someone is burbling then they do not see the feodora. If the joellen jumpstart the feodora and the joellen does not see the feodora then the feodora is rubberlike. The joellen is maxi.", "logic": "\nRubberlike(feodora)\nMaxi(feodora)\nAcroscopic(feodora)\nInunct(feodora, joellen)\nDefecate(feodora, joellen)\nnot Jumpstart(feodora, joellen)\nSlanderous(joellen)\nRubberlike(joellen)\nnot Burbling(joellen)\nInunct(joellen, feodora)\nDefecate(joellen, feodora)\nJumpstart(joellen, feodora)\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, feodora) and not Burbling(x) -> Inunct(feodora, joellen))\nforall x (Acroscopic(x) -> Inunct(x, feodora))\nforall x (Maxi(x) -> Jumpstart(x, feodora))\nforall x (Defecate(x, feodora) -> Slanderous(x))\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, joellen) and Inunct(joellen, feodora) -> Defecate(joellen, feodora))\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, feodora) and Acroscopic(x) -> Defecate(x, feodora))\nforall x (Burbling(x) -> not Defecate(x, feodora))\nJumpstart(joellen, feodora) and not Defecate(joellen, feodora) -> Rubberlike(feodora)\n\nMaxi(joellen)\n\nMaxi(joellen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The carolan is intestinal. The carolan is maiden. The carolan is romaic. The carolan gasconade the leanora. The carolan vest the leanora. The carolan does not visit the leanora. The leanora is sterilized. The leanora is intestinal. The leanora is not lowered. The leanora gasconade the carolan. The leanora vest the carolan. The leanora scrimp the carolan. If someone scrimp the carolan and they are not lowered then the carolan gasconade the leanora. If someone is romaic then they like the carolan. If someone is maiden then they visit the carolan. If someone vest the carolan then they are sterilized. If someone scrimp the leanora and the leanora gasconade the carolan then the leanora vest the carolan. If someone scrimp the carolan and they are romaic then they see the carolan. If someone is lowered then they do not see the carolan. If the leanora scrimp the carolan and the leanora does not see the carolan then the carolan is intestinal. The leanora is not romaic.", "logic": "\nIntestinal(carolan)\nMaiden(carolan)\nRomaic(carolan)\nGasconade(carolan, leanora)\nVest(carolan, leanora)\nnot Scrimp(carolan, leanora)\nSterilized(leanora)\nIntestinal(leanora)\nnot Lowered(leanora)\nGasconade(leanora, carolan)\nVest(leanora, carolan)\nScrimp(leanora, carolan)\nforall x (Scrimp(x, carolan) and not Lowered(x) -> Gasconade(carolan, leanora))\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> Gasconade(x, carolan))\nforall x (Maiden(x) -> Scrimp(x, carolan))\nforall x (Vest(x, carolan) -> Sterilized(x))\nforall x (Scrimp(x, leanora) and Gasconade(leanora, carolan) -> Vest(leanora, carolan))\nforall x (Scrimp(x, carolan) and Romaic(x) -> Vest(x, carolan))\nforall x (Lowered(x) -> not Vest(x, carolan))\nScrimp(leanora, carolan) and not Vest(leanora, carolan) -> Intestinal(carolan)\n\nnot Romaic(leanora)\n\nnot Romaic(leanora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "The dabney is hearable. The dabney is focused. The dabney is bouldered. The dabney bombinate the alisun. The dabney cave the alisun. The dabney does not visit the alisun. The alisun is earthbound. The alisun is hearable. The alisun is not blabby. The alisun bombinate the dabney. The alisun cave the dabney. The alisun button the dabney. If someone button the dabney and they are not blabby then the dabney bombinate the alisun. If someone is bouldered then they like the dabney. If someone is focused then they visit the dabney. If someone cave the dabney then they are earthbound. If someone button the alisun and the alisun bombinate the dabney then the alisun cave the dabney. If someone button the dabney and they are bouldered then they see the dabney. If someone is blabby then they do not see the dabney. If the alisun button the dabney and the alisun does not see the dabney then the dabney is hearable. The dabney is blabby.", "logic": "\nHearable(dabney)\nFocused(dabney)\nBouldered(dabney)\nBombinate(dabney, alisun)\nCave(dabney, alisun)\nnot Button(dabney, alisun)\nEarthbound(alisun)\nHearable(alisun)\nnot Blabby(alisun)\nBombinate(alisun, dabney)\nCave(alisun, dabney)\nButton(alisun, dabney)\nforall x (Button(x, dabney) and not Blabby(x) -> Bombinate(dabney, alisun))\nforall x (Bouldered(x) -> Bombinate(x, dabney))\nforall x (Focused(x) -> Button(x, dabney))\nforall x (Cave(x, dabney) -> Earthbound(x))\nforall x (Button(x, alisun) and Bombinate(alisun, dabney) -> Cave(alisun, dabney))\nforall x (Button(x, dabney) and Bouldered(x) -> Cave(x, dabney))\nforall x (Blabby(x) -> not Cave(x, dabney))\nButton(alisun, dabney) and not Cave(alisun, dabney) -> Hearable(dabney)\n\nBlabby(dabney)\n\nBlabby(dabney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1173"} {"premises": "Jens is like. Jens is sturdy. Jens is knockout. Jens is agreed. Jens is fruiting. Jens is benignant. Jens is spoiled. Jesus is like. Jesus is sturdy. Jesus is agreed. Jesus is spoiled. Marnie is sturdy. Marnie is knockout. Marnie is agreed. Marnie is benignant. If something is knockout then it is benignant. Young, benignant things are fruiting. Young things are knockout. Jesus is sturdy.", "logic": "\nLike(jens)\nSturdy(jens)\nKnockout(jens)\nAgreed(jens)\nFruiting(jens)\nBenignant(jens)\nSpoiled(jens)\nLike(jesus)\nSturdy(jesus)\nAgreed(jesus)\nSpoiled(jesus)\nSturdy(marnie)\nKnockout(marnie)\nAgreed(marnie)\nBenignant(marnie)\nforall x (Knockout(x) -> Benignant(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) and Benignant(x) -> Fruiting(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) -> Knockout(x))\n\nSturdy(jesus)\n\ntherefore Sturdy(jesus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Eydie is joyless. Eydie is plastered. Eydie is snide. Eydie is mustached. Eydie is unfaceted. Eydie is squabby. Eydie is snub. Sarah is joyless. Sarah is plastered. Sarah is mustached. Sarah is snub. Abner is plastered. Abner is snide. Abner is mustached. Abner is squabby. If something is snide then it is squabby. Young, squabby things are unfaceted. Young things are snide. Sarah is not snub.", "logic": "\nJoyless(eydie)\nPlastered(eydie)\nSnide(eydie)\nMustached(eydie)\nUnfaceted(eydie)\nSquabby(eydie)\nSnub(eydie)\nJoyless(sarah)\nPlastered(sarah)\nMustached(sarah)\nSnub(sarah)\nPlastered(abner)\nSnide(abner)\nMustached(abner)\nSquabby(abner)\nforall x (Snide(x) -> Squabby(x))\nforall x (Snub(x) and Squabby(x) -> Unfaceted(x))\nforall x (Snub(x) -> Snide(x))\n\nnot Snub(sarah)\n\ntherefore Snub(sarah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Andonis is uniformed. Andonis is frozen. Andonis is zigzag. Andonis is cilial. Andonis is unarmed. Andonis is amnionic. Andonis is lidless. Aubert is uniformed. Aubert is frozen. Aubert is cilial. Aubert is lidless. Savina is frozen. Savina is zigzag. Savina is cilial. Savina is amnionic. If something is zigzag then it is amnionic. Young, amnionic things are unarmed. Young things are zigzag. Aubert is zigzag.", "logic": "\nUniformed(andonis)\nFrozen(andonis)\nZigzag(andonis)\nCilial(andonis)\nUnarmed(andonis)\nAmnionic(andonis)\nLidless(andonis)\nUniformed(aubert)\nFrozen(aubert)\nCilial(aubert)\nLidless(aubert)\nFrozen(savina)\nZigzag(savina)\nCilial(savina)\nAmnionic(savina)\nforall x (Zigzag(x) -> Amnionic(x))\nforall x (Lidless(x) and Amnionic(x) -> Unarmed(x))\nforall x (Lidless(x) -> Zigzag(x))\n\nZigzag(aubert)\n\nLidless(aubert) and forall x (Lidless(x) -> Zigzag(x)) -> therefore Zigzag(aubert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Evangelin is peckish. Evangelin is wimpish. Evangelin is suited. Evangelin is frictional. Evangelin is united. Evangelin is ebon. Evangelin is fistular. Sharyl is peckish. Sharyl is wimpish. Sharyl is frictional. Sharyl is fistular. Tobin is wimpish. Tobin is suited. Tobin is frictional. Tobin is ebon. If something is suited then it is ebon. Young, ebon things are united. Young things are suited. Sharyl is not suited.", "logic": "\nPeckish(evangelin)\nWimpish(evangelin)\nSuited(evangelin)\nFrictional(evangelin)\nUnited(evangelin)\nEbon(evangelin)\nFistular(evangelin)\nPeckish(sharyl)\nWimpish(sharyl)\nFrictional(sharyl)\nFistular(sharyl)\nWimpish(tobin)\nSuited(tobin)\nFrictional(tobin)\nEbon(tobin)\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Ebon(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) and Ebon(x) -> United(x))\nforall x (Fistular(x) -> Suited(x))\n\nnot Suited(sharyl)\n\nFistular(sharyl) and forall x (Fistular(x) -> Suited(x)) -> therefore Suited(sharyl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Ritch is uppercase. Ritch is ingenuous. Ritch is levitical. Ritch is darkening. Ritch is whacking. Ritch is coccoid. Ritch is cenobitic. Tallia is uppercase. Tallia is ingenuous. Tallia is darkening. Tallia is cenobitic. Prince is ingenuous. Prince is levitical. Prince is darkening. Prince is coccoid. If something is levitical then it is coccoid. Young, coccoid things are whacking. Young things are levitical. Tallia is coccoid.", "logic": "\nUppercase(ritch)\nIngenuous(ritch)\nLevitical(ritch)\nDarkening(ritch)\nWhacking(ritch)\nCoccoid(ritch)\nCenobitic(ritch)\nUppercase(tallia)\nIngenuous(tallia)\nDarkening(tallia)\nCenobitic(tallia)\nIngenuous(prince)\nLevitical(prince)\nDarkening(prince)\nCoccoid(prince)\nforall x (Levitical(x) -> Coccoid(x))\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) and Coccoid(x) -> Whacking(x))\nforall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Levitical(x))\n\nCoccoid(tallia)\n\nCenobitic(tallia) and forall x (Cenobitic(x) -> Levitical(x)) -> therefore Levitical(tallia) Levitical(tallia) and forall x (Levitical(x) -> Coccoid(x)) -> therefore Coccoid(tallia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Norrie is angulate. Norrie is baptismal. Norrie is resonating. Norrie is unknown. Norrie is contiguous. Norrie is sicilian. Norrie is modeled. Dawn is angulate. Dawn is baptismal. Dawn is unknown. Dawn is modeled. Sherman is baptismal. Sherman is resonating. Sherman is unknown. Sherman is sicilian. If something is resonating then it is sicilian. Young, sicilian things are contiguous. Young things are resonating. Dawn is not sicilian.", "logic": "\nAngulate(norrie)\nBaptismal(norrie)\nResonating(norrie)\nUnknown(norrie)\nContiguous(norrie)\nSicilian(norrie)\nModeled(norrie)\nAngulate(dawn)\nBaptismal(dawn)\nUnknown(dawn)\nModeled(dawn)\nBaptismal(sherman)\nResonating(sherman)\nUnknown(sherman)\nSicilian(sherman)\nforall x (Resonating(x) -> Sicilian(x))\nforall x (Modeled(x) and Sicilian(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Modeled(x) -> Resonating(x))\n\nnot Sicilian(dawn)\n\nModeled(dawn) and forall x (Modeled(x) -> Resonating(x)) -> therefore Resonating(dawn) Resonating(dawn) and forall x (Resonating(x) -> Sicilian(x)) -> therefore Sicilian(dawn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Emily is despondent. Emily is propellant. Emily is admissive. Emily is aloof. Emily is cashable. Emily is beholden. Emily is ravishing. Anjela is despondent. Anjela is propellant. Anjela is aloof. Anjela is ravishing. Ethelyn is propellant. Ethelyn is admissive. Ethelyn is aloof. Ethelyn is beholden. If something is admissive then it is beholden. Young, beholden things are cashable. Young things are admissive. Anjela is cashable.", "logic": "\nDespondent(emily)\nPropellant(emily)\nAdmissive(emily)\nAloof(emily)\nCashable(emily)\nBeholden(emily)\nRavishing(emily)\nDespondent(anjela)\nPropellant(anjela)\nAloof(anjela)\nRavishing(anjela)\nPropellant(ethelyn)\nAdmissive(ethelyn)\nAloof(ethelyn)\nBeholden(ethelyn)\nforall x (Admissive(x) -> Beholden(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) and Beholden(x) -> Cashable(x))\nforall x (Ravishing(x) -> Admissive(x))\n\nCashable(anjela)\n\nRavishing(anjela) and forall x (Ravishing(x) -> Admissive(x)) -> therefore Admissive(anjela) Admissive(anjela) and forall x (Admissive(x) -> Beholden(x)) -> therefore Beholden(anjela) Ravishing(anjela) and Beholden(anjela) and forall x (Ravishing(x) and Beholden(x) -> Cashable(x)) -> therefore Cashable(anjela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Emmye is glazed. Emmye is outright. Emmye is feverous. Emmye is creative. Emmye is untrusty. Emmye is weighty. Emmye is baptized. Retha is glazed. Retha is outright. Retha is creative. Retha is baptized. Bell is outright. Bell is feverous. Bell is creative. Bell is weighty. If something is feverous then it is weighty. Young, weighty things are untrusty. Young things are feverous. Retha is not untrusty.", "logic": "\nGlazed(emmye)\nOutright(emmye)\nFeverous(emmye)\nCreative(emmye)\nUntrusty(emmye)\nWeighty(emmye)\nBaptized(emmye)\nGlazed(retha)\nOutright(retha)\nCreative(retha)\nBaptized(retha)\nOutright(bell)\nFeverous(bell)\nCreative(bell)\nWeighty(bell)\nforall x (Feverous(x) -> Weighty(x))\nforall x (Baptized(x) and Weighty(x) -> Untrusty(x))\nforall x (Baptized(x) -> Feverous(x))\n\nnot Untrusty(retha)\n\nBaptized(retha) and forall x (Baptized(x) -> Feverous(x)) -> therefore Feverous(retha) Feverous(retha) and forall x (Feverous(x) -> Weighty(x)) -> therefore Weighty(retha) Baptized(retha) and Weighty(retha) and forall x (Baptized(x) and Weighty(x) -> Untrusty(x)) -> therefore Untrusty(retha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Brewer is unbranded. Brewer is ilxx. Brewer is unbranched. Brewer is buff. Brewer is untrusty. Brewer is purblind. Brewer is clannish. Sly is unbranded. Sly is ilxx. Sly is buff. Sly is clannish. Jacintha is ilxx. Jacintha is unbranched. Jacintha is buff. Jacintha is purblind. If something is unbranched then it is purblind. Young, purblind things are untrusty. Young things are unbranched. Jacintha is not untrusty.", "logic": "\nUnbranded(brewer)\nIlxx(brewer)\nUnbranched(brewer)\nBuff(brewer)\nUntrusty(brewer)\nPurblind(brewer)\nClannish(brewer)\nUnbranded(sly)\nIlxx(sly)\nBuff(sly)\nClannish(sly)\nIlxx(jacintha)\nUnbranched(jacintha)\nBuff(jacintha)\nPurblind(jacintha)\nforall x (Unbranched(x) -> Purblind(x))\nforall x (Clannish(x) and Purblind(x) -> Untrusty(x))\nforall x (Clannish(x) -> Unbranched(x))\n\nnot Untrusty(jacintha)\n\nforall x (Clannish(x) and Purblind(x) -> Untrusty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "Vanny is prefrontal. Vanny is familial. Vanny is mislabeled. Vanny is nipping. Vanny is dashing. Vanny is wiggly. Vanny is buxom. Yance is prefrontal. Yance is familial. Yance is nipping. Yance is buxom. Madeleine is familial. Madeleine is mislabeled. Madeleine is nipping. Madeleine is wiggly. If something is mislabeled then it is wiggly. Young, wiggly things are dashing. Young things are mislabeled. Madeleine is buxom.", "logic": "\nPrefrontal(vanny)\nFamilial(vanny)\nMislabeled(vanny)\nNipping(vanny)\nDashing(vanny)\nWiggly(vanny)\nBuxom(vanny)\nPrefrontal(yance)\nFamilial(yance)\nNipping(yance)\nBuxom(yance)\nFamilial(madeleine)\nMislabeled(madeleine)\nNipping(madeleine)\nWiggly(madeleine)\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Wiggly(x))\nforall x (Buxom(x) and Wiggly(x) -> Dashing(x))\nforall x (Buxom(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\n\nBuxom(madeleine)\n\nBuxom(madeleine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1239"} {"premises": "The bonny is neither. The bonny is sterling. The bonny is confluent. The bonny is not bicyclic. The bonny is homostyled. If someone is bicyclic and sterling then they are homostyled. The bonny is neither.", "logic": "\nNeither(bonny)\nSterling(bonny)\nConfluent(bonny)\nnot Bicyclic(bonny)\nHomostyled(bonny)\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Sterling(x) -> Homostyled(x))\n\nNeither(bonny)\n\ntherefore Neither(bonny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4840"} {"premises": "The webster is nucleated. The webster is cloven. The webster is instinct. The webster is not analeptic. The webster is consular. If someone is analeptic and cloven then they are consular. The webster is not consular.", "logic": "\nNucleated(webster)\nCloven(webster)\nInstinct(webster)\nnot Analeptic(webster)\nConsular(webster)\nforall x (Analeptic(x) and Cloven(x) -> Consular(x))\n\nnot Consular(webster)\n\ntherefore Consular(webster)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4840"} {"premises": "The zeus is clustered. The zeus is airy. The zeus is despiteful. The zeus is not caesarian. The zeus is spermatic. If someone is caesarian and airy then they are spermatic. The zeus does not chase the zeus.", "logic": "\nClustered(zeus)\nAiry(zeus)\nDespiteful(zeus)\nnot Caesarian(zeus)\nSpermatic(zeus)\nforall x (Caesarian(x) and Airy(x) -> Spermatic(x))\n\nnot Chases(zeus, zeus)\n\nnot Chases(zeus, zeus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4840"} {"premises": "The sam is right. The sam is pragmatic. The sam is huffish. The sam is not episodic. The sam is attended. If someone is episodic and pragmatic then they are attended. The sam eats the sam.", "logic": "\nRight(sam)\nPragmatic(sam)\nHuffish(sam)\nnot Episodic(sam)\nAttended(sam)\nforall x (Episodic(x) and Pragmatic(x) -> Attended(x))\n\nEats(sam, sam)\n\nEats(sam, sam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4840"} {"premises": "Clifford is unthinking. Mark is gloveless. Wandis is not desolate. Laura is unfirm. If someone is riming then they are ungraded. All unthinking people are ungraded. All ungraded people are not aliquot. Green people are unthinking. Red, riming people are not unthinking. If someone is riming then they are unthinking. Laura is unfirm.", "logic": "\nUnthinking(clifford)\nGloveless(mark)\nnot Desolate(wandis)\nUnfirm(laura)\nforall x (Riming(x) -> Ungraded(x))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) -> Ungraded(x))\nforall x (Ungraded(x) -> not Aliquot(x))\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Ungraded(x) and Riming(x) -> not Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Riming(x) -> Unthinking(x))\n\nUnfirm(laura)\n\ntherefore Unfirm(laura)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Wally is amnic. Ruthanne is tongueless. Gregory is not dynamic. Betty is battleful. If someone is lethal then they are glorified. All amnic people are glorified. All glorified people are not lowset. Green people are amnic. Red, lethal people are not amnic. If someone is lethal then they are amnic. Betty is not battleful.", "logic": "\nAmnic(wally)\nTongueless(ruthanne)\nnot Dynamic(gregory)\nBattleful(betty)\nforall x (Lethal(x) -> Glorified(x))\nforall x (Amnic(x) -> Glorified(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) -> not Lowset(x))\nforall x (Battleful(x) -> Amnic(x))\nforall x (Glorified(x) and Lethal(x) -> not Amnic(x))\nforall x (Lethal(x) -> Amnic(x))\n\nnot Battleful(betty)\n\ntherefore Battleful(betty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Lurleen is menacing. Sarine is leguminous. Meghann is not shabby. Orly is phenotypic. If someone is adipose then they are bungaloid. All menacing people are bungaloid. All bungaloid people are not askance. Green people are menacing. Red, adipose people are not menacing. If someone is adipose then they are menacing. Orly is menacing.", "logic": "\nMenacing(lurleen)\nLeguminous(sarine)\nnot Shabby(meghann)\nPhenotypic(orly)\nforall x (Adipose(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Menacing(x) -> Bungaloid(x))\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) -> not Askance(x))\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) -> Menacing(x))\nforall x (Bungaloid(x) and Adipose(x) -> not Menacing(x))\nforall x (Adipose(x) -> Menacing(x))\n\nMenacing(orly)\n\nPhenotypic(orly) and forall x (Phenotypic(x) -> Menacing(x)) -> therefore Menacing(orly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Ludvig is metastatic. Ulick is coordinate. Claretta is not tardive. Kristos is vestmental. If someone is useless then they are amenable. All metastatic people are amenable. All amenable people are not reversible. Green people are metastatic. Red, useless people are not metastatic. If someone is useless then they are metastatic. Ludvig is not amenable.", "logic": "\nMetastatic(ludvig)\nCoordinate(ulick)\nnot Tardive(claretta)\nVestmental(kristos)\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Metastatic(x) -> Amenable(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) -> not Reversible(x))\nforall x (Vestmental(x) -> Metastatic(x))\nforall x (Amenable(x) and Useless(x) -> not Metastatic(x))\nforall x (Useless(x) -> Metastatic(x))\n\nnot Amenable(ludvig)\n\nMetastatic(ludvig) and forall x (Metastatic(x) -> Amenable(x)) -> therefore Amenable(ludvig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Antony is rubbishy. Betteanne is both. Dolorita is not downstair. Terina is riveting. If someone is titulary then they are legible. All rubbishy people are legible. All legible people are not meshed. Green people are rubbishy. Red, titulary people are not rubbishy. If someone is titulary then they are rubbishy. Antony is not meshed.", "logic": "\nRubbishy(antony)\nBoth(betteanne)\nnot Downstair(dolorita)\nRiveting(terina)\nforall x (Titulary(x) -> Legible(x))\nforall x (Rubbishy(x) -> Legible(x))\nforall x (Legible(x) -> not Meshed(x))\nforall x (Riveting(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\nforall x (Legible(x) and Titulary(x) -> not Rubbishy(x))\nforall x (Titulary(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\n\nnot Meshed(antony)\n\nRubbishy(antony) and forall x (Rubbishy(x) -> Legible(x)) -> therefore Legible(antony) Legible(antony) and forall x (Legible(x) -> not Meshed(x)) -> therefore not Meshed(antony)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Steward is peltate. Tomlin is miffed. Raymundo is not oozing. Abbie is daft. If someone is dividable then they are bipartisan. All peltate people are bipartisan. All bipartisan people are not intramural. Green people are peltate. Red, dividable people are not peltate. If someone is dividable then they are peltate. Steward is intramural.", "logic": "\nPeltate(steward)\nMiffed(tomlin)\nnot Oozing(raymundo)\nDaft(abbie)\nforall x (Dividable(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Peltate(x) -> Bipartisan(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> not Intramural(x))\nforall x (Daft(x) -> Peltate(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Dividable(x) -> not Peltate(x))\nforall x (Dividable(x) -> Peltate(x))\n\nIntramural(steward)\n\nPeltate(steward) and forall x (Peltate(x) -> Bipartisan(x)) -> therefore Bipartisan(steward) Bipartisan(steward) and forall x (Bipartisan(x) -> not Intramural(x)) -> therefore not Intramural(steward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Waine is needled. Georgine is expressive. Saxon is not acarpelous. Laurance is semipublic. If someone is occupied then they are areolate. All needled people are areolate. All areolate people are not fervent. Green people are needled. Red, occupied people are not needled. If someone is occupied then they are needled. Laurance is not fervent.", "logic": "\nNeedled(waine)\nExpressive(georgine)\nnot Acarpelous(saxon)\nSemipublic(laurance)\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Areolate(x))\nforall x (Needled(x) -> Areolate(x))\nforall x (Areolate(x) -> not Fervent(x))\nforall x (Semipublic(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Areolate(x) and Occupied(x) -> not Needled(x))\nforall x (Occupied(x) -> Needled(x))\n\nnot Fervent(laurance)\n\nSemipublic(laurance) and forall x (Semipublic(x) -> Needled(x)) -> therefore Needled(laurance) Needled(laurance) and forall x (Needled(x) -> Areolate(x)) -> therefore Areolate(laurance) Areolate(laurance) and forall x (Areolate(x) -> not Fervent(x)) -> therefore not Fervent(laurance)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Gabriela is critical. Madalyn is aglow. Johnna is not enveloping. Arturo is ephemeral. If someone is aliform then they are faithless. All critical people are faithless. All faithless people are not tenderized. Green people are critical. Red, aliform people are not critical. If someone is aliform then they are critical. Arturo is tenderized.", "logic": "\nCritical(gabriela)\nAglow(madalyn)\nnot Enveloping(johnna)\nEphemeral(arturo)\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Faithless(x))\nforall x (Critical(x) -> Faithless(x))\nforall x (Faithless(x) -> not Tenderized(x))\nforall x (Ephemeral(x) -> Critical(x))\nforall x (Faithless(x) and Aliform(x) -> not Critical(x))\nforall x (Aliform(x) -> Critical(x))\n\nTenderized(arturo)\n\nEphemeral(arturo) and forall x (Ephemeral(x) -> Critical(x)) -> therefore Critical(arturo) Critical(arturo) and forall x (Critical(x) -> Faithless(x)) -> therefore Faithless(arturo) Faithless(arturo) and forall x (Faithless(x) -> not Tenderized(x)) -> therefore not Tenderized(arturo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Faun is unruffled. Claribel is sufficient. Spike is not monoicous. Darci is placating. If someone is physical then they are overstated. All unruffled people are overstated. All overstated people are not asthmatic. Green people are unruffled. Red, physical people are not unruffled. If someone is physical then they are unruffled. Spike is not overstated.", "logic": "\nUnruffled(faun)\nSufficient(claribel)\nnot Monoicous(spike)\nPlacating(darci)\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Overstated(x))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Overstated(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) -> not Asthmatic(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Overstated(x) and Physical(x) -> not Unruffled(x))\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Unruffled(x))\n\nnot Overstated(spike)\n\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Overstated(x)) <- forall x (Placating(x) -> Unruffled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Rudy is calculated. Dionysus is topmost. Luke is not elfish. Antonio is arrayed. If someone is sluicing then they are reflected. All calculated people are reflected. All reflected people are not monetary. Green people are calculated. Red, sluicing people are not calculated. If someone is sluicing then they are calculated. Dionysus is calculated.", "logic": "\nCalculated(rudy)\nTopmost(dionysus)\nnot Elfish(luke)\nArrayed(antonio)\nforall x (Sluicing(x) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Calculated(x) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Reflected(x) -> not Monetary(x))\nforall x (Arrayed(x) -> Calculated(x))\nforall x (Reflected(x) and Sluicing(x) -> not Calculated(x))\nforall x (Sluicing(x) -> Calculated(x))\n\nCalculated(dionysus)\n\nforall x (Arrayed(x) -> Calculated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Harvey is yeatsian. Tricia is addible. Adnan is not mutilated. Bianca is cancellate. If someone is bounteous then they are incised. All yeatsian people are incised. All incised people are not motley. Green people are yeatsian. Red, bounteous people are not yeatsian. If someone is bounteous then they are yeatsian. Adnan is not yeatsian.", "logic": "\nYeatsian(harvey)\nAddible(tricia)\nnot Mutilated(adnan)\nCancellate(bianca)\nforall x (Bounteous(x) -> Incised(x))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) -> Incised(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) -> not Motley(x))\nforall x (Cancellate(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Incised(x) and Bounteous(x) -> not Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Bounteous(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\n\nnot Yeatsian(adnan)\n\nforall x (Cancellate(x) -> Yeatsian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Ursola is enervating. Faydra is extreme. Federica is not shitty. Arlana is genealogic. If someone is scrubby then they are shockable. All enervating people are shockable. All shockable people are not fearful. Green people are enervating. Red, scrubby people are not enervating. If someone is scrubby then they are enervating. Faydra is shockable.", "logic": "\nEnervating(ursola)\nExtreme(faydra)\nnot Shitty(federica)\nGenealogic(arlana)\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Shockable(x))\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Shockable(x))\nforall x (Shockable(x) -> not Fearful(x))\nforall x (Genealogic(x) -> Enervating(x))\nforall x (Shockable(x) and Scrubby(x) -> not Enervating(x))\nforall x (Scrubby(x) -> Enervating(x))\n\nShockable(faydra)\n\nforall x (Enervating(x) -> Shockable(x)) <- forall x (Genealogic(x) -> Enervating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Taylor is deathlike. Prasad is calando. Ulrike is not xxxv. Lucian is unrifled. If someone is adulterous then they are obvious. All deathlike people are obvious. All obvious people are not abdominous. Green people are deathlike. Red, adulterous people are not deathlike. If someone is adulterous then they are deathlike. Ulrike is not adulterous.", "logic": "\nDeathlike(taylor)\nCalando(prasad)\nnot Xxxv(ulrike)\nUnrifled(lucian)\nforall x (Adulterous(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Deathlike(x) -> Obvious(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) -> not Abdominous(x))\nforall x (Unrifled(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Obvious(x) and Adulterous(x) -> not Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Adulterous(x) -> Deathlike(x))\n\nnot Adulterous(ulrike)\n\nnot Adulterous(ulrike) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Moishe is concluded. Lars is correlated. Erinn is not rightish. Fara is shamefaced. If someone is odious then they are silvern. All concluded people are silvern. All silvern people are not selfsame. Green people are concluded. Red, odious people are not concluded. If someone is odious then they are concluded. Lars is shamefaced.", "logic": "\nConcluded(moishe)\nCorrelated(lars)\nnot Rightish(erinn)\nShamefaced(fara)\nforall x (Odious(x) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Concluded(x) -> Silvern(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) -> not Selfsame(x))\nforall x (Shamefaced(x) -> Concluded(x))\nforall x (Silvern(x) and Odious(x) -> not Concluded(x))\nforall x (Odious(x) -> Concluded(x))\n\nShamefaced(lars)\n\nShamefaced(lars) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Duffie is soupy. Rivy is exportable. Rafa is not lxxxiii. Rourke is smoky. If someone is forbidding then they are softish. All soupy people are softish. All softish people are not alkalic. Green people are soupy. Red, forbidding people are not soupy. If someone is forbidding then they are soupy. Duffie is not lxxxiii.", "logic": "\nSoupy(duffie)\nExportable(rivy)\nnot Lxxxiii(rafa)\nSmoky(rourke)\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Softish(x))\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Softish(x))\nforall x (Softish(x) -> not Alkalic(x))\nforall x (Smoky(x) -> Soupy(x))\nforall x (Softish(x) and Forbidding(x) -> not Soupy(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) -> Soupy(x))\n\nnot Lxxxiii(duffie)\n\nnot Lxxxiii(duffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Halli is colonnaded. Hollyanne is heralded. Sydelle is not upraised. Isis is mediatory. If someone is altered then they are awesome. All colonnaded people are awesome. All awesome people are not poised. Green people are colonnaded. Red, altered people are not colonnaded. If someone is altered then they are colonnaded. Isis is altered.", "logic": "\nColonnaded(halli)\nHeralded(hollyanne)\nnot Upraised(sydelle)\nMediatory(isis)\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Awesome(x))\nforall x (Colonnaded(x) -> Awesome(x))\nforall x (Awesome(x) -> not Poised(x))\nforall x (Mediatory(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Awesome(x) and Altered(x) -> not Colonnaded(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Colonnaded(x))\n\nAltered(isis)\n\nAltered(isis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-877"} {"premises": "Norah is ambrosian. If someone is capitalist and stuck then they are ambrosian. Cold, capitalist people are photogenic. Norah is ambrosian.", "logic": "\nAmbrosian(norah)\nforall x (Capitalist(x) and Stuck(x) -> Ambrosian(x))\nforall x (Ambrosian(x) and Capitalist(x) -> Photogenic(x))\n\nAmbrosian(norah)\n\ntherefore Ambrosian(norah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-61"} {"premises": "Raymond is froward. If someone is rhymeless and sensitive then they are froward. Cold, rhymeless people are vestmented. Raymond is not froward.", "logic": "\nFroward(raymond)\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) and Sensitive(x) -> Froward(x))\nforall x (Froward(x) and Rhymeless(x) -> Vestmented(x))\n\nnot Froward(raymond)\n\ntherefore Froward(raymond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-61"} {"premises": "Deena is socratic. If someone is retained and proximal then they are socratic. Cold, retained people are ambiguous. Deena is not ambiguous.", "logic": "\nSocratic(deena)\nforall x (Retained(x) and Proximal(x) -> Socratic(x))\nforall x (Socratic(x) and Retained(x) -> Ambiguous(x))\n\nnot Ambiguous(deena)\n\nforall x (Socratic(x) and Retained(x) -> Ambiguous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-61"} {"premises": "Jasmin is papillate. If someone is subsidized and appeasing then they are papillate. Cold, subsidized people are insolvent. Jasmin is subsidized.", "logic": "\nPapillate(jasmin)\nforall x (Subsidized(x) and Appeasing(x) -> Papillate(x))\nforall x (Papillate(x) and Subsidized(x) -> Insolvent(x))\n\nSubsidized(jasmin)\n\nSubsidized(jasmin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-61"} {"premises": "Laina is wailing. Goddart is wailing. Annalyse is avocado. Annalyse is wailing. Annalyse is meaningful. Annalyse is permeant. Annalyse is provisory. Yance is enchained. Yance is avocado. Yance is permeant. If someone is meaningful and permeant then they are unvaned. If someone is avocado then they are meaningful. All wailing, provisory people are enchained. Laina is wailing.", "logic": "\nWailing(laina)\nWailing(goddart)\nAvocado(annalyse)\nWailing(annalyse)\nMeaningful(annalyse)\nPermeant(annalyse)\nProvisory(annalyse)\nEnchained(yance)\nAvocado(yance)\nPermeant(yance)\nforall x (Meaningful(x) and Permeant(x) -> Unvaned(x))\nforall x (Avocado(x) -> Meaningful(x))\nforall x (Wailing(x) and Provisory(x) -> Enchained(x))\n\nWailing(laina)\n\ntherefore Wailing(laina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "Olympie is showy. Lorilyn is showy. Dick is unplowed. Dick is showy. Dick is coenobitic. Dick is lightless. Dick is polar. Dorette is hawkish. Dorette is unplowed. Dorette is lightless. If someone is coenobitic and lightless then they are numeric. If someone is unplowed then they are coenobitic. All showy, polar people are hawkish. Dick is not coenobitic.", "logic": "\nShowy(olympie)\nShowy(lorilyn)\nUnplowed(dick)\nShowy(dick)\nCoenobitic(dick)\nLightless(dick)\nPolar(dick)\nHawkish(dorette)\nUnplowed(dorette)\nLightless(dorette)\nforall x (Coenobitic(x) and Lightless(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Unplowed(x) -> Coenobitic(x))\nforall x (Showy(x) and Polar(x) -> Hawkish(x))\n\nnot Coenobitic(dick)\n\ntherefore Coenobitic(dick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "Ursulina is slanderous. Janel is slanderous. Carmita is bismuthal. Carmita is slanderous. Carmita is cuboidal. Carmita is elusive. Carmita is crispy. Jenn is excretory. Jenn is bismuthal. Jenn is elusive. If someone is cuboidal and elusive then they are stellate. If someone is bismuthal then they are cuboidal. All slanderous, crispy people are excretory. Jenn is cuboidal.", "logic": "\nSlanderous(ursulina)\nSlanderous(janel)\nBismuthal(carmita)\nSlanderous(carmita)\nCuboidal(carmita)\nElusive(carmita)\nCrispy(carmita)\nExcretory(jenn)\nBismuthal(jenn)\nElusive(jenn)\nforall x (Cuboidal(x) and Elusive(x) -> Stellate(x))\nforall x (Bismuthal(x) -> Cuboidal(x))\nforall x (Slanderous(x) and Crispy(x) -> Excretory(x))\n\nCuboidal(jenn)\n\nBismuthal(jenn) and forall x (Bismuthal(x) -> Cuboidal(x)) -> therefore Cuboidal(jenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "Wynny is astonished. Vikki is astonished. Eloise is cerebral. Eloise is astonished. Eloise is apterous. Eloise is optical. Eloise is untwisted. Dorolisa is tipsy. Dorolisa is cerebral. Dorolisa is optical. If someone is apterous and optical then they are yeatsian. If someone is cerebral then they are apterous. All astonished, untwisted people are tipsy. Dorolisa is not apterous.", "logic": "\nAstonished(wynny)\nAstonished(vikki)\nCerebral(eloise)\nAstonished(eloise)\nApterous(eloise)\nOptical(eloise)\nUntwisted(eloise)\nTipsy(dorolisa)\nCerebral(dorolisa)\nOptical(dorolisa)\nforall x (Apterous(x) and Optical(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Cerebral(x) -> Apterous(x))\nforall x (Astonished(x) and Untwisted(x) -> Tipsy(x))\n\nnot Apterous(dorolisa)\n\nCerebral(dorolisa) and forall x (Cerebral(x) -> Apterous(x)) -> therefore Apterous(dorolisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "Catherin is caulked. Estelle is caulked. Zack is malign. Zack is caulked. Zack is committed. Zack is flaccid. Zack is adulterate. Roth is amygdaline. Roth is malign. Roth is flaccid. If someone is committed and flaccid then they are myopathic. If someone is malign then they are committed. All caulked, adulterate people are amygdaline. Estelle is not committed.", "logic": "\nCaulked(catherin)\nCaulked(estelle)\nMalign(zack)\nCaulked(zack)\nCommitted(zack)\nFlaccid(zack)\nAdulterate(zack)\nAmygdaline(roth)\nMalign(roth)\nFlaccid(roth)\nforall x (Committed(x) and Flaccid(x) -> Myopathic(x))\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Committed(x))\nforall x (Caulked(x) and Adulterate(x) -> Amygdaline(x))\n\nnot Committed(estelle)\n\nforall x (Malign(x) -> Committed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "Quintilla is rich. Berget is rich. Mirabel is cedarn. Mirabel is rich. Mirabel is apogamic. Mirabel is anorectal. Mirabel is shivery. Fanni is unreduced. Fanni is cedarn. Fanni is anorectal. If someone is apogamic and anorectal then they are anorectal. If someone is cedarn then they are apogamic. All rich, shivery people are unreduced. Quintilla is anorectal.", "logic": "\nRich(quintilla)\nRich(berget)\nCedarn(mirabel)\nRich(mirabel)\nApogamic(mirabel)\nAnorectal(mirabel)\nShivery(mirabel)\nUnreduced(fanni)\nCedarn(fanni)\nAnorectal(fanni)\nforall x (Apogamic(x) and Anorectal(x) -> Anorectal(x))\nforall x (Cedarn(x) -> Apogamic(x))\nforall x (Rich(x) and Shivery(x) -> Unreduced(x))\n\nAnorectal(quintilla)\n\nforall x (Apogamic(x) and Anorectal(x) -> Anorectal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "Valaree is crimson. Olwen is crimson. Lucius is ironical. Lucius is crimson. Lucius is chapped. Lucius is unexpended. Lucius is inboard. Adela is airless. Adela is ironical. Adela is unexpended. If someone is chapped and unexpended then they are snarled. If someone is ironical then they are chapped. All crimson, inboard people are airless. Adela is not crimson.", "logic": "\nCrimson(valaree)\nCrimson(olwen)\nIronical(lucius)\nCrimson(lucius)\nChapped(lucius)\nUnexpended(lucius)\nInboard(lucius)\nAirless(adela)\nIronical(adela)\nUnexpended(adela)\nforall x (Chapped(x) and Unexpended(x) -> Snarled(x))\nforall x (Ironical(x) -> Chapped(x))\nforall x (Crimson(x) and Inboard(x) -> Airless(x))\n\nnot Crimson(adela)\n\nnot Crimson(adela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "Merle is similar. Sandra is similar. Laure is unsanitary. Laure is similar. Laure is unsmiling. Laure is mortgaged. Laure is atonal. Meridel is motivated. Meridel is unsanitary. Meridel is mortgaged. If someone is unsmiling and mortgaged then they are sclerotic. If someone is unsanitary then they are unsmiling. All similar, atonal people are motivated. Merle is mortgaged.", "logic": "\nSimilar(merle)\nSimilar(sandra)\nUnsanitary(laure)\nSimilar(laure)\nUnsmiling(laure)\nMortgaged(laure)\nAtonal(laure)\nMotivated(meridel)\nUnsanitary(meridel)\nMortgaged(meridel)\nforall x (Unsmiling(x) and Mortgaged(x) -> Sclerotic(x))\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Unsmiling(x))\nforall x (Similar(x) and Atonal(x) -> Motivated(x))\n\nMortgaged(merle)\n\nMortgaged(merle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2986"} {"premises": "The reena wean the dalia. The reena wean the wash. The reena is influent. The reena is burdensome. The reena cherish the dalia. The reena cherish the wash. The reena sightread the wash. The dalia wean the reena. The dalia wean the wash. The dalia cherish the reena. The dalia sightread the reena. The wash wean the reena. The wash is backhanded. The wash cherish the dalia. The wash sightread the dalia. If someone is prisonlike then they are burdensome. If someone wean the wash then they eat the dalia. If someone wean the wash and the wash cherish the reena then the wash wean the reena. If someone wean the dalia then they like the reena. If the dalia wean the wash and the dalia cherish the reena then the wash is smitten. If the reena cherish the dalia then the dalia cherish the reena. If someone is influent and they like the dalia then the dalia wean the reena. If someone wean the reena and they like the dalia then they eat the wash. The dalia sightread the reena.", "logic": "\nWean(reena, dalia)\nWean(reena, wash)\nInfluent(reena)\nBurdensome(reena)\nCherish(reena, dalia)\nCherish(reena, wash)\nSightread(reena, wash)\nWean(dalia, reena)\nWean(dalia, wash)\nCherish(dalia, reena)\nSightread(dalia, reena)\nWean(wash, reena)\nBackhanded(wash)\nCherish(wash, dalia)\nSightread(wash, dalia)\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Burdensome(x))\nforall x (Wean(x, wash) -> Wean(x, dalia))\nforall x (Wean(x, wash) and Cherish(wash, reena) -> Wean(wash, reena))\nforall x (Wean(x, dalia) -> Cherish(x, reena))\nWean(dalia, wash) and Cherish(dalia, reena) -> Smitten(wash)\nCherish(reena, dalia) -> Cherish(dalia, reena)\nforall x (Influent(x) and Cherish(x, dalia) -> Wean(dalia, reena))\nforall x (Wean(x, reena) and Cherish(x, dalia) -> Wean(x, wash))\n\nSightread(dalia, reena)\n\ntherefore Sightread(dalia, reena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The chariot pick the denice. The chariot pick the judas. The chariot is classy. The chariot is appetising. The chariot explode the denice. The chariot explode the judas. The chariot rust the judas. The denice pick the chariot. The denice pick the judas. The denice explode the chariot. The denice rust the chariot. The judas pick the chariot. The judas is boundless. The judas explode the denice. The judas rust the denice. If someone is jaded then they are appetising. If someone pick the judas then they eat the denice. If someone pick the judas and the judas explode the chariot then the judas pick the chariot. If someone pick the denice then they like the chariot. If the denice pick the judas and the denice explode the chariot then the judas is binding. If the chariot explode the denice then the denice explode the chariot. If someone is classy and they like the denice then the denice pick the chariot. If someone pick the chariot and they like the denice then they eat the judas. The denice does not eat the chariot.", "logic": "\nPick(chariot, denice)\nPick(chariot, judas)\nClassy(chariot)\nAppetising(chariot)\nExplode(chariot, denice)\nExplode(chariot, judas)\nRust(chariot, judas)\nPick(denice, chariot)\nPick(denice, judas)\nExplode(denice, chariot)\nRust(denice, chariot)\nPick(judas, chariot)\nBoundless(judas)\nExplode(judas, denice)\nRust(judas, denice)\nforall x (Jaded(x) -> Appetising(x))\nforall x (Pick(x, judas) -> Pick(x, denice))\nforall x (Pick(x, judas) and Explode(judas, chariot) -> Pick(judas, chariot))\nforall x (Pick(x, denice) -> Explode(x, chariot))\nPick(denice, judas) and Explode(denice, chariot) -> Binding(judas)\nExplode(chariot, denice) -> Explode(denice, chariot)\nforall x (Classy(x) and Explode(x, denice) -> Pick(denice, chariot))\nforall x (Pick(x, chariot) and Explode(x, denice) -> Pick(x, judas))\n\nnot Pick(denice, chariot)\n\ntherefore Pick(denice, chariot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The nessa asperse the nicoline. The nessa asperse the floyd. The nessa is predaceous. The nessa is vulpine. The nessa discuss the nicoline. The nessa discuss the floyd. The nessa hoist the floyd. The nicoline asperse the nessa. The nicoline asperse the floyd. The nicoline discuss the nessa. The nicoline hoist the nessa. The floyd asperse the nessa. The floyd is mucoidal. The floyd discuss the nicoline. The floyd hoist the nicoline. If someone is statuary then they are vulpine. If someone asperse the floyd then they eat the nicoline. If someone asperse the floyd and the floyd discuss the nessa then the floyd asperse the nessa. If someone asperse the nicoline then they like the nessa. If the nicoline asperse the floyd and the nicoline discuss the nessa then the floyd is apodous. If the nessa discuss the nicoline then the nicoline discuss the nessa. If someone is predaceous and they like the nicoline then the nicoline asperse the nessa. If someone asperse the nessa and they like the nicoline then they eat the floyd. The floyd is apodous.", "logic": "\nAsperse(nessa, nicoline)\nAsperse(nessa, floyd)\nPredaceous(nessa)\nVulpine(nessa)\nDiscuss(nessa, nicoline)\nDiscuss(nessa, floyd)\nHoist(nessa, floyd)\nAsperse(nicoline, nessa)\nAsperse(nicoline, floyd)\nDiscuss(nicoline, nessa)\nHoist(nicoline, nessa)\nAsperse(floyd, nessa)\nMucoidal(floyd)\nDiscuss(floyd, nicoline)\nHoist(floyd, nicoline)\nforall x (Statuary(x) -> Vulpine(x))\nforall x (Asperse(x, floyd) -> Asperse(x, nicoline))\nforall x (Asperse(x, floyd) and Discuss(floyd, nessa) -> Asperse(floyd, nessa))\nforall x (Asperse(x, nicoline) -> Discuss(x, nessa))\nAsperse(nicoline, floyd) and Discuss(nicoline, nessa) -> Apodous(floyd)\nDiscuss(nessa, nicoline) -> Discuss(nicoline, nessa)\nforall x (Predaceous(x) and Discuss(x, nicoline) -> Asperse(nicoline, nessa))\nforall x (Asperse(x, nessa) and Discuss(x, nicoline) -> Asperse(x, floyd))\n\nApodous(floyd)\n\nAsperse(nicoline, floyd) and Discuss(nicoline, nessa) and Asperse(nicoline, floyd) and Discuss(nicoline, nessa) -> Apodous(floyd) -> therefore Apodous(floyd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The olympia palpebrate the nickie. The olympia palpebrate the marta. The olympia is placed. The olympia is stained. The olympia doubt the nickie. The olympia doubt the marta. The olympia assuage the marta. The nickie palpebrate the olympia. The nickie palpebrate the marta. The nickie doubt the olympia. The nickie assuage the olympia. The marta palpebrate the olympia. The marta is bedimmed. The marta doubt the nickie. The marta assuage the nickie. If someone is vapourised then they are stained. If someone palpebrate the marta then they eat the nickie. If someone palpebrate the marta and the marta doubt the olympia then the marta palpebrate the olympia. If someone palpebrate the nickie then they like the olympia. If the nickie palpebrate the marta and the nickie doubt the olympia then the marta is watertight. If the olympia doubt the nickie then the nickie doubt the olympia. If someone is placed and they like the nickie then the nickie palpebrate the olympia. If someone palpebrate the olympia and they like the nickie then they eat the marta. The olympia does not like the olympia.", "logic": "\nPalpebrate(olympia, nickie)\nPalpebrate(olympia, marta)\nPlaced(olympia)\nStained(olympia)\nDoubt(olympia, nickie)\nDoubt(olympia, marta)\nAssuage(olympia, marta)\nPalpebrate(nickie, olympia)\nPalpebrate(nickie, marta)\nDoubt(nickie, olympia)\nAssuage(nickie, olympia)\nPalpebrate(marta, olympia)\nBedimmed(marta)\nDoubt(marta, nickie)\nAssuage(marta, nickie)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Stained(x))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x, marta) -> Palpebrate(x, nickie))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x, marta) and Doubt(marta, olympia) -> Palpebrate(marta, olympia))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x, nickie) -> Doubt(x, olympia))\nPalpebrate(nickie, marta) and Doubt(nickie, olympia) -> Watertight(marta)\nDoubt(olympia, nickie) -> Doubt(nickie, olympia)\nforall x (Placed(x) and Doubt(x, nickie) -> Palpebrate(nickie, olympia))\nforall x (Palpebrate(x, olympia) and Doubt(x, nickie) -> Palpebrate(x, marta))\n\nnot Doubt(olympia, olympia)\n\nPalpebrate(olympia, nickie) and forall x (Palpebrate(x, nickie) -> Doubt(x, olympia)) -> therefore Doubt(olympia, olympia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The charleton pray the mary. The charleton pray the lydie. The charleton is feasible. The charleton is ulcerated. The charleton pound the mary. The charleton pound the lydie. The charleton panic the lydie. The mary pray the charleton. The mary pray the lydie. The mary pound the charleton. The mary panic the charleton. The lydie pray the charleton. The lydie is eurasiatic. The lydie pound the mary. The lydie panic the mary. If someone is surficial then they are ulcerated. If someone pray the lydie then they eat the mary. If someone pray the lydie and the lydie pound the charleton then the lydie pray the charleton. If someone pray the mary then they like the charleton. If the mary pray the lydie and the mary pound the charleton then the lydie is expiratory. If the charleton pound the mary then the mary pound the charleton. If someone is feasible and they like the mary then the mary pray the charleton. If someone pray the charleton and they like the mary then they eat the lydie. The lydie pray the mary.", "logic": "\nPray(charleton, mary)\nPray(charleton, lydie)\nFeasible(charleton)\nUlcerated(charleton)\nPound(charleton, mary)\nPound(charleton, lydie)\nPanic(charleton, lydie)\nPray(mary, charleton)\nPray(mary, lydie)\nPound(mary, charleton)\nPanic(mary, charleton)\nPray(lydie, charleton)\nEurasiatic(lydie)\nPound(lydie, mary)\nPanic(lydie, mary)\nforall x (Surficial(x) -> Ulcerated(x))\nforall x (Pray(x, lydie) -> Pray(x, mary))\nforall x (Pray(x, lydie) and Pound(lydie, charleton) -> Pray(lydie, charleton))\nforall x (Pray(x, mary) -> Pound(x, charleton))\nPray(mary, lydie) and Pound(mary, charleton) -> Expiratory(lydie)\nPound(charleton, mary) -> Pound(mary, charleton)\nforall x (Feasible(x) and Pound(x, mary) -> Pray(mary, charleton))\nforall x (Pray(x, charleton) and Pound(x, mary) -> Pray(x, lydie))\n\nPray(lydie, mary)\n\nPray(lydie, charleton) and Pound(lydie, mary) and forall x (Pray(x, charleton) and Pound(x, mary) -> Pray(x, lydie)) -> therefore Pray(lydie, lydie) Pray(lydie, lydie) and forall x (Pray(x, lydie) -> Pray(x, mary)) -> therefore Pray(lydie, mary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The pepe croquet the fulvia. The pepe croquet the hoyt. The pepe is graphic. The pepe is exothermal. The pepe efface the fulvia. The pepe efface the hoyt. The pepe nitpick the hoyt. The fulvia croquet the pepe. The fulvia croquet the hoyt. The fulvia efface the pepe. The fulvia nitpick the pepe. The hoyt croquet the pepe. The hoyt is municipal. The hoyt efface the fulvia. The hoyt nitpick the fulvia. If someone is inky then they are exothermal. If someone croquet the hoyt then they eat the fulvia. If someone croquet the hoyt and the hoyt efface the pepe then the hoyt croquet the pepe. If someone croquet the fulvia then they like the pepe. If the fulvia croquet the hoyt and the fulvia efface the pepe then the hoyt is unmated. If the pepe efface the fulvia then the fulvia efface the pepe. If someone is graphic and they like the fulvia then the fulvia croquet the pepe. If someone croquet the pepe and they like the fulvia then they eat the hoyt. The hoyt does not eat the fulvia.", "logic": "\nCroquet(pepe, fulvia)\nCroquet(pepe, hoyt)\nGraphic(pepe)\nExothermal(pepe)\nEfface(pepe, fulvia)\nEfface(pepe, hoyt)\nNitpick(pepe, hoyt)\nCroquet(fulvia, pepe)\nCroquet(fulvia, hoyt)\nEfface(fulvia, pepe)\nNitpick(fulvia, pepe)\nCroquet(hoyt, pepe)\nMunicipal(hoyt)\nEfface(hoyt, fulvia)\nNitpick(hoyt, fulvia)\nforall x (Inky(x) -> Exothermal(x))\nforall x (Croquet(x, hoyt) -> Croquet(x, fulvia))\nforall x (Croquet(x, hoyt) and Efface(hoyt, pepe) -> Croquet(hoyt, pepe))\nforall x (Croquet(x, fulvia) -> Efface(x, pepe))\nCroquet(fulvia, hoyt) and Efface(fulvia, pepe) -> Unmated(hoyt)\nEfface(pepe, fulvia) -> Efface(fulvia, pepe)\nforall x (Graphic(x) and Efface(x, fulvia) -> Croquet(fulvia, pepe))\nforall x (Croquet(x, pepe) and Efface(x, fulvia) -> Croquet(x, hoyt))\n\nnot Croquet(hoyt, fulvia)\n\nCroquet(hoyt, pepe) and Efface(hoyt, fulvia) and forall x (Croquet(x, pepe) and Efface(x, fulvia) -> Croquet(x, hoyt)) -> therefore Croquet(hoyt, hoyt) Croquet(hoyt, hoyt) and forall x (Croquet(x, hoyt) -> Croquet(x, fulvia)) -> therefore Croquet(hoyt, fulvia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The geraldina colour the theresina. The geraldina colour the anjanette. The geraldina is unisexual. The geraldina is spinose. The geraldina barricado the theresina. The geraldina barricado the anjanette. The geraldina flatten the anjanette. The theresina colour the geraldina. The theresina colour the anjanette. The theresina barricado the geraldina. The theresina flatten the geraldina. The anjanette colour the geraldina. The anjanette is oversewn. The anjanette barricado the theresina. The anjanette flatten the theresina. If someone is discursive then they are spinose. If someone colour the anjanette then they eat the theresina. If someone colour the anjanette and the anjanette barricado the geraldina then the anjanette colour the geraldina. If someone colour the theresina then they like the geraldina. If the theresina colour the anjanette and the theresina barricado the geraldina then the anjanette is extricable. If the geraldina barricado the theresina then the theresina barricado the geraldina. If someone is unisexual and they like the theresina then the theresina colour the geraldina. If someone colour the geraldina and they like the theresina then they eat the anjanette. The anjanette barricado the geraldina.", "logic": "\nColour(geraldina, theresina)\nColour(geraldina, anjanette)\nUnisexual(geraldina)\nSpinose(geraldina)\nBarricado(geraldina, theresina)\nBarricado(geraldina, anjanette)\nFlatten(geraldina, anjanette)\nColour(theresina, geraldina)\nColour(theresina, anjanette)\nBarricado(theresina, geraldina)\nFlatten(theresina, geraldina)\nColour(anjanette, geraldina)\nOversewn(anjanette)\nBarricado(anjanette, theresina)\nFlatten(anjanette, theresina)\nforall x (Discursive(x) -> Spinose(x))\nforall x (Colour(x, anjanette) -> Colour(x, theresina))\nforall x (Colour(x, anjanette) and Barricado(anjanette, geraldina) -> Colour(anjanette, geraldina))\nforall x (Colour(x, theresina) -> Barricado(x, geraldina))\nColour(theresina, anjanette) and Barricado(theresina, geraldina) -> Extricable(anjanette)\nBarricado(geraldina, theresina) -> Barricado(theresina, geraldina)\nforall x (Unisexual(x) and Barricado(x, theresina) -> Colour(theresina, geraldina))\nforall x (Colour(x, geraldina) and Barricado(x, theresina) -> Colour(x, anjanette))\n\nBarricado(anjanette, geraldina)\n\nColour(anjanette, geraldina) and Barricado(anjanette, theresina) and forall x (Colour(x, geraldina) and Barricado(x, theresina) -> Colour(x, anjanette)) -> therefore Colour(anjanette, anjanette) Colour(anjanette, anjanette) and forall x (Colour(x, anjanette) -> Colour(x, theresina)) -> therefore Colour(anjanette, theresina) Colour(anjanette, theresina) and forall x (Colour(x, theresina) -> Barricado(x, geraldina)) -> therefore Barricado(anjanette, geraldina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The hurley fertilise the billy. The hurley fertilise the merril. The hurley is living. The hurley is guinean. The hurley inactivate the billy. The hurley inactivate the merril. The hurley refuse the merril. The billy fertilise the hurley. The billy fertilise the merril. The billy inactivate the hurley. The billy refuse the hurley. The merril fertilise the hurley. The merril is unwitting. The merril inactivate the billy. The merril refuse the billy. If someone is distracted then they are guinean. If someone fertilise the merril then they eat the billy. If someone fertilise the merril and the merril inactivate the hurley then the merril fertilise the hurley. If someone fertilise the billy then they like the hurley. If the billy fertilise the merril and the billy inactivate the hurley then the merril is dissected. If the hurley inactivate the billy then the billy inactivate the hurley. If someone is living and they like the billy then the billy fertilise the hurley. If someone fertilise the hurley and they like the billy then they eat the merril. The merril does not like the hurley.", "logic": "\nFertilise(hurley, billy)\nFertilise(hurley, merril)\nLiving(hurley)\nGuinean(hurley)\nInactivate(hurley, billy)\nInactivate(hurley, merril)\nRefuse(hurley, merril)\nFertilise(billy, hurley)\nFertilise(billy, merril)\nInactivate(billy, hurley)\nRefuse(billy, hurley)\nFertilise(merril, hurley)\nUnwitting(merril)\nInactivate(merril, billy)\nRefuse(merril, billy)\nforall x (Distracted(x) -> Guinean(x))\nforall x (Fertilise(x, merril) -> Fertilise(x, billy))\nforall x (Fertilise(x, merril) and Inactivate(merril, hurley) -> Fertilise(merril, hurley))\nforall x (Fertilise(x, billy) -> Inactivate(x, hurley))\nFertilise(billy, merril) and Inactivate(billy, hurley) -> Dissected(merril)\nInactivate(hurley, billy) -> Inactivate(billy, hurley)\nforall x (Living(x) and Inactivate(x, billy) -> Fertilise(billy, hurley))\nforall x (Fertilise(x, hurley) and Inactivate(x, billy) -> Fertilise(x, merril))\n\nnot Inactivate(merril, hurley)\n\nFertilise(merril, hurley) and Inactivate(merril, billy) and forall x (Fertilise(x, hurley) and Inactivate(x, billy) -> Fertilise(x, merril)) -> therefore Fertilise(merril, merril) Fertilise(merril, merril) and forall x (Fertilise(x, merril) -> Fertilise(x, billy)) -> therefore Fertilise(merril, billy) Fertilise(merril, billy) and forall x (Fertilise(x, billy) -> Inactivate(x, hurley)) -> therefore Inactivate(merril, hurley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The lambert bandy the deva. The lambert bandy the belicia. The lambert is yuman. The lambert is nostalgic. The lambert grip the deva. The lambert grip the belicia. The lambert regroup the belicia. The deva bandy the lambert. The deva bandy the belicia. The deva grip the lambert. The deva regroup the lambert. The belicia bandy the lambert. The belicia is syrupy. The belicia grip the deva. The belicia regroup the deva. If someone is damp then they are nostalgic. If someone bandy the belicia then they eat the deva. If someone bandy the belicia and the belicia grip the lambert then the belicia bandy the lambert. If someone bandy the deva then they like the lambert. If the deva bandy the belicia and the deva grip the lambert then the belicia is shrewish. If the lambert grip the deva then the deva grip the lambert. If someone is yuman and they like the deva then the deva bandy the lambert. If someone bandy the lambert and they like the deva then they eat the belicia. The deva is not nostalgic.", "logic": "\nBandy(lambert, deva)\nBandy(lambert, belicia)\nYuman(lambert)\nNostalgic(lambert)\nGrip(lambert, deva)\nGrip(lambert, belicia)\nRegroup(lambert, belicia)\nBandy(deva, lambert)\nBandy(deva, belicia)\nGrip(deva, lambert)\nRegroup(deva, lambert)\nBandy(belicia, lambert)\nSyrupy(belicia)\nGrip(belicia, deva)\nRegroup(belicia, deva)\nforall x (Damp(x) -> Nostalgic(x))\nforall x (Bandy(x, belicia) -> Bandy(x, deva))\nforall x (Bandy(x, belicia) and Grip(belicia, lambert) -> Bandy(belicia, lambert))\nforall x (Bandy(x, deva) -> Grip(x, lambert))\nBandy(deva, belicia) and Grip(deva, lambert) -> Shrewish(belicia)\nGrip(lambert, deva) -> Grip(deva, lambert)\nforall x (Yuman(x) and Grip(x, deva) -> Bandy(deva, lambert))\nforall x (Bandy(x, lambert) and Grip(x, deva) -> Bandy(x, belicia))\n\nnot Nostalgic(deva)\n\nforall x (Damp(x) -> Nostalgic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The deeanne lave the lise. The deeanne lave the carena. The deeanne is bimetallic. The deeanne is paraguayan. The deeanne golf the lise. The deeanne golf the carena. The deeanne sightsee the carena. The lise lave the deeanne. The lise lave the carena. The lise golf the deeanne. The lise sightsee the deeanne. The carena lave the deeanne. The carena is spread. The carena golf the lise. The carena sightsee the lise. If someone is hempen then they are paraguayan. If someone lave the carena then they eat the lise. If someone lave the carena and the carena golf the deeanne then the carena lave the deeanne. If someone lave the lise then they like the deeanne. If the lise lave the carena and the lise golf the deeanne then the carena is existent. If the deeanne golf the lise then the lise golf the deeanne. If someone is bimetallic and they like the lise then the lise lave the deeanne. If someone lave the deeanne and they like the lise then they eat the carena. The carena is paraguayan.", "logic": "\nLave(deeanne, lise)\nLave(deeanne, carena)\nBimetallic(deeanne)\nParaguayan(deeanne)\nGolf(deeanne, lise)\nGolf(deeanne, carena)\nSightsee(deeanne, carena)\nLave(lise, deeanne)\nLave(lise, carena)\nGolf(lise, deeanne)\nSightsee(lise, deeanne)\nLave(carena, deeanne)\nSpread(carena)\nGolf(carena, lise)\nSightsee(carena, lise)\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Lave(x, carena) -> Lave(x, lise))\nforall x (Lave(x, carena) and Golf(carena, deeanne) -> Lave(carena, deeanne))\nforall x (Lave(x, lise) -> Golf(x, deeanne))\nLave(lise, carena) and Golf(lise, deeanne) -> Existent(carena)\nGolf(deeanne, lise) -> Golf(lise, deeanne)\nforall x (Bimetallic(x) and Golf(x, lise) -> Lave(lise, deeanne))\nforall x (Lave(x, deeanne) and Golf(x, lise) -> Lave(x, carena))\n\nParaguayan(carena)\n\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Paraguayan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The emory caramelize the wallie. The emory caramelize the nonnah. The emory is looted. The emory is disclosed. The emory plead the wallie. The emory plead the nonnah. The emory deafen the nonnah. The wallie caramelize the emory. The wallie caramelize the nonnah. The wallie plead the emory. The wallie deafen the emory. The nonnah caramelize the emory. The nonnah is vexing. The nonnah plead the wallie. The nonnah deafen the wallie. If someone is aoristic then they are disclosed. If someone caramelize the nonnah then they eat the wallie. If someone caramelize the nonnah and the nonnah plead the emory then the nonnah caramelize the emory. If someone caramelize the wallie then they like the emory. If the wallie caramelize the nonnah and the wallie plead the emory then the nonnah is honied. If the emory plead the wallie then the wallie plead the emory. If someone is looted and they like the wallie then the wallie caramelize the emory. If someone caramelize the emory and they like the wallie then they eat the nonnah. The emory does not visit the emory.", "logic": "\nCaramelize(emory, wallie)\nCaramelize(emory, nonnah)\nLooted(emory)\nDisclosed(emory)\nPlead(emory, wallie)\nPlead(emory, nonnah)\nDeafen(emory, nonnah)\nCaramelize(wallie, emory)\nCaramelize(wallie, nonnah)\nPlead(wallie, emory)\nDeafen(wallie, emory)\nCaramelize(nonnah, emory)\nVexing(nonnah)\nPlead(nonnah, wallie)\nDeafen(nonnah, wallie)\nforall x (Aoristic(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nforall x (Caramelize(x, nonnah) -> Caramelize(x, wallie))\nforall x (Caramelize(x, nonnah) and Plead(nonnah, emory) -> Caramelize(nonnah, emory))\nforall x (Caramelize(x, wallie) -> Plead(x, emory))\nCaramelize(wallie, nonnah) and Plead(wallie, emory) -> Honied(nonnah)\nPlead(emory, wallie) -> Plead(wallie, emory)\nforall x (Looted(x) and Plead(x, wallie) -> Caramelize(wallie, emory))\nforall x (Caramelize(x, emory) and Plead(x, wallie) -> Caramelize(x, nonnah))\n\nnot Deafen(emory, emory)\n\nnot Deafen(emory, emory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The evania blog the emlynn. The evania blog the nadia. The evania is mitigated. The evania is floating. The evania volley the emlynn. The evania volley the nadia. The evania retrovert the nadia. The emlynn blog the evania. The emlynn blog the nadia. The emlynn volley the evania. The emlynn retrovert the evania. The nadia blog the evania. The nadia is dauntless. The nadia volley the emlynn. The nadia retrovert the emlynn. If someone is athletic then they are floating. If someone blog the nadia then they eat the emlynn. If someone blog the nadia and the nadia volley the evania then the nadia blog the evania. If someone blog the emlynn then they like the evania. If the emlynn blog the nadia and the emlynn volley the evania then the nadia is rearing. If the evania volley the emlynn then the emlynn volley the evania. If someone is mitigated and they like the emlynn then the emlynn blog the evania. If someone blog the evania and they like the emlynn then they eat the nadia. The evania is dauntless.", "logic": "\nBlog(evania, emlynn)\nBlog(evania, nadia)\nMitigated(evania)\nFloating(evania)\nVolley(evania, emlynn)\nVolley(evania, nadia)\nRetrovert(evania, nadia)\nBlog(emlynn, evania)\nBlog(emlynn, nadia)\nVolley(emlynn, evania)\nRetrovert(emlynn, evania)\nBlog(nadia, evania)\nDauntless(nadia)\nVolley(nadia, emlynn)\nRetrovert(nadia, emlynn)\nforall x (Athletic(x) -> Floating(x))\nforall x (Blog(x, nadia) -> Blog(x, emlynn))\nforall x (Blog(x, nadia) and Volley(nadia, evania) -> Blog(nadia, evania))\nforall x (Blog(x, emlynn) -> Volley(x, evania))\nBlog(emlynn, nadia) and Volley(emlynn, evania) -> Rearing(nadia)\nVolley(evania, emlynn) -> Volley(emlynn, evania)\nforall x (Mitigated(x) and Volley(x, emlynn) -> Blog(emlynn, evania))\nforall x (Blog(x, evania) and Volley(x, emlynn) -> Blog(x, nadia))\n\nDauntless(evania)\n\nDauntless(evania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The cordelie spatchcock the erich. The cordelie spatchcock the sax. The cordelie is spaced. The cordelie is rasping. The cordelie interfere the erich. The cordelie interfere the sax. The cordelie weigh the sax. The erich spatchcock the cordelie. The erich spatchcock the sax. The erich interfere the cordelie. The erich weigh the cordelie. The sax spatchcock the cordelie. The sax is lustful. The sax interfere the erich. The sax weigh the erich. If someone is anaphasic then they are rasping. If someone spatchcock the sax then they eat the erich. If someone spatchcock the sax and the sax interfere the cordelie then the sax spatchcock the cordelie. If someone spatchcock the erich then they like the cordelie. If the erich spatchcock the sax and the erich interfere the cordelie then the sax is golden. If the cordelie interfere the erich then the erich interfere the cordelie. If someone is spaced and they like the erich then the erich spatchcock the cordelie. If someone spatchcock the cordelie and they like the erich then they eat the sax. The cordelie does not visit the erich.", "logic": "\nSpatchcock(cordelie, erich)\nSpatchcock(cordelie, sax)\nSpaced(cordelie)\nRasping(cordelie)\nInterfere(cordelie, erich)\nInterfere(cordelie, sax)\nWeigh(cordelie, sax)\nSpatchcock(erich, cordelie)\nSpatchcock(erich, sax)\nInterfere(erich, cordelie)\nWeigh(erich, cordelie)\nSpatchcock(sax, cordelie)\nLustful(sax)\nInterfere(sax, erich)\nWeigh(sax, erich)\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) -> Rasping(x))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, sax) -> Spatchcock(x, erich))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, sax) and Interfere(sax, cordelie) -> Spatchcock(sax, cordelie))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, erich) -> Interfere(x, cordelie))\nSpatchcock(erich, sax) and Interfere(erich, cordelie) -> Golden(sax)\nInterfere(cordelie, erich) -> Interfere(erich, cordelie)\nforall x (Spaced(x) and Interfere(x, erich) -> Spatchcock(erich, cordelie))\nforall x (Spatchcock(x, cordelie) and Interfere(x, erich) -> Spatchcock(x, sax))\n\nnot Weigh(cordelie, erich)\n\nnot Weigh(cordelie, erich) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The tonie blame the ward. The tonie blame the viviyan. The tonie is jain. The tonie is juridic. The tonie esteem the ward. The tonie esteem the viviyan. The tonie coact the viviyan. The ward blame the tonie. The ward blame the viviyan. The ward esteem the tonie. The ward coact the tonie. The viviyan blame the tonie. The viviyan is nilpotent. The viviyan esteem the ward. The viviyan coact the ward. If someone is georgian then they are juridic. If someone blame the viviyan then they eat the ward. If someone blame the viviyan and the viviyan esteem the tonie then the viviyan blame the tonie. If someone blame the ward then they like the tonie. If the ward blame the viviyan and the ward esteem the tonie then the viviyan is connubial. If the tonie esteem the ward then the ward esteem the tonie. If someone is jain and they like the ward then the ward blame the tonie. If someone blame the tonie and they like the ward then they eat the viviyan. The tonie is georgian.", "logic": "\nBlame(tonie, ward)\nBlame(tonie, viviyan)\nJain(tonie)\nJuridic(tonie)\nEsteem(tonie, ward)\nEsteem(tonie, viviyan)\nCoact(tonie, viviyan)\nBlame(ward, tonie)\nBlame(ward, viviyan)\nEsteem(ward, tonie)\nCoact(ward, tonie)\nBlame(viviyan, tonie)\nNilpotent(viviyan)\nEsteem(viviyan, ward)\nCoact(viviyan, ward)\nforall x (Georgian(x) -> Juridic(x))\nforall x (Blame(x, viviyan) -> Blame(x, ward))\nforall x (Blame(x, viviyan) and Esteem(viviyan, tonie) -> Blame(viviyan, tonie))\nforall x (Blame(x, ward) -> Esteem(x, tonie))\nBlame(ward, viviyan) and Esteem(ward, tonie) -> Connubial(viviyan)\nEsteem(tonie, ward) -> Esteem(ward, tonie)\nforall x (Jain(x) and Esteem(x, ward) -> Blame(ward, tonie))\nforall x (Blame(x, tonie) and Esteem(x, ward) -> Blame(x, viviyan))\n\nGeorgian(tonie)\n\nGeorgian(tonie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The clemmy discuss the elisha. The clemmy discuss the gustie. The clemmy is uncooked. The clemmy is flavorsome. The clemmy dissociate the elisha. The clemmy dissociate the gustie. The clemmy spool the gustie. The elisha discuss the clemmy. The elisha discuss the gustie. The elisha dissociate the clemmy. The elisha spool the clemmy. The gustie discuss the clemmy. The gustie is meteoritic. The gustie dissociate the elisha. The gustie spool the elisha. If someone is pretorial then they are flavorsome. If someone discuss the gustie then they eat the elisha. If someone discuss the gustie and the gustie dissociate the clemmy then the gustie discuss the clemmy. If someone discuss the elisha then they like the clemmy. If the elisha discuss the gustie and the elisha dissociate the clemmy then the gustie is classic. If the clemmy dissociate the elisha then the elisha dissociate the clemmy. If someone is uncooked and they like the elisha then the elisha discuss the clemmy. If someone discuss the clemmy and they like the elisha then they eat the gustie. The gustie does not visit the clemmy.", "logic": "\nDiscuss(clemmy, elisha)\nDiscuss(clemmy, gustie)\nUncooked(clemmy)\nFlavorsome(clemmy)\nDissociate(clemmy, elisha)\nDissociate(clemmy, gustie)\nSpool(clemmy, gustie)\nDiscuss(elisha, clemmy)\nDiscuss(elisha, gustie)\nDissociate(elisha, clemmy)\nSpool(elisha, clemmy)\nDiscuss(gustie, clemmy)\nMeteoritic(gustie)\nDissociate(gustie, elisha)\nSpool(gustie, elisha)\nforall x (Pretorial(x) -> Flavorsome(x))\nforall x (Discuss(x, gustie) -> Discuss(x, elisha))\nforall x (Discuss(x, gustie) and Dissociate(gustie, clemmy) -> Discuss(gustie, clemmy))\nforall x (Discuss(x, elisha) -> Dissociate(x, clemmy))\nDiscuss(elisha, gustie) and Dissociate(elisha, clemmy) -> Classic(gustie)\nDissociate(clemmy, elisha) -> Dissociate(elisha, clemmy)\nforall x (Uncooked(x) and Dissociate(x, elisha) -> Discuss(elisha, clemmy))\nforall x (Discuss(x, clemmy) and Dissociate(x, elisha) -> Discuss(x, gustie))\n\nnot Spool(gustie, clemmy)\n\nnot Spool(gustie, clemmy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "The aurore mark the addie. The aurore mark the cherianne. The aurore is smashing. The aurore is unbraced. The aurore reprehend the addie. The aurore reprehend the cherianne. The aurore grade the cherianne. The addie mark the aurore. The addie mark the cherianne. The addie reprehend the aurore. The addie grade the aurore. The cherianne mark the aurore. The cherianne is windswept. The cherianne reprehend the addie. The cherianne grade the addie. If someone is fastidious then they are unbraced. If someone mark the cherianne then they eat the addie. If someone mark the cherianne and the cherianne reprehend the aurore then the cherianne mark the aurore. If someone mark the addie then they like the aurore. If the addie mark the cherianne and the addie reprehend the aurore then the cherianne is hungry. If the aurore reprehend the addie then the addie reprehend the aurore. If someone is smashing and they like the addie then the addie mark the aurore. If someone mark the aurore and they like the addie then they eat the cherianne. The addie is fastidious.", "logic": "\nMark(aurore, addie)\nMark(aurore, cherianne)\nSmashing(aurore)\nUnbraced(aurore)\nReprehend(aurore, addie)\nReprehend(aurore, cherianne)\nGrade(aurore, cherianne)\nMark(addie, aurore)\nMark(addie, cherianne)\nReprehend(addie, aurore)\nGrade(addie, aurore)\nMark(cherianne, aurore)\nWindswept(cherianne)\nReprehend(cherianne, addie)\nGrade(cherianne, addie)\nforall x (Fastidious(x) -> Unbraced(x))\nforall x (Mark(x, cherianne) -> Mark(x, addie))\nforall x (Mark(x, cherianne) and Reprehend(cherianne, aurore) -> Mark(cherianne, aurore))\nforall x (Mark(x, addie) -> Reprehend(x, aurore))\nMark(addie, cherianne) and Reprehend(addie, aurore) -> Hungry(cherianne)\nReprehend(aurore, addie) -> Reprehend(addie, aurore)\nforall x (Smashing(x) and Reprehend(x, addie) -> Mark(addie, aurore))\nforall x (Mark(x, aurore) and Reprehend(x, addie) -> Mark(x, cherianne))\n\nFastidious(addie)\n\nFastidious(addie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-470"} {"premises": "Ahmet is charnel. Ahmet is relentless. Ahmet is scientific. Merrick is relentless. Merrick is scientific. Merrick is acyclic. Editha is charnel. Editha is relentless. Mercy is relentless. Mercy is direct. Kind, charnel things are direct. Quiet, relentless things are eellike. Smart, charnel things are laminar. Merrick is relentless.", "logic": "\nCharnel(ahmet)\nRelentless(ahmet)\nScientific(ahmet)\nRelentless(merrick)\nScientific(merrick)\nAcyclic(merrick)\nCharnel(editha)\nRelentless(editha)\nRelentless(mercy)\nDirect(mercy)\nforall x (Scientific(x) and Charnel(x) -> Direct(x))\nforall x (Direct(x) and Relentless(x) -> Eellike(x))\nforall x (Eellike(x) and Charnel(x) -> Laminar(x))\n\nRelentless(merrick)\n\ntherefore Relentless(merrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Violante is unscathed. Violante is invincible. Violante is ternary. Luella is invincible. Luella is ternary. Luella is interbred. Giorgio is unscathed. Giorgio is invincible. Daphne is invincible. Daphne is protozoic. Kind, unscathed things are protozoic. Quiet, invincible things are apetalous. Smart, unscathed things are foolproof. Giorgio is not invincible.", "logic": "\nUnscathed(violante)\nInvincible(violante)\nTernary(violante)\nInvincible(luella)\nTernary(luella)\nInterbred(luella)\nUnscathed(giorgio)\nInvincible(giorgio)\nInvincible(daphne)\nProtozoic(daphne)\nforall x (Ternary(x) and Unscathed(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and Invincible(x) -> Apetalous(x))\nforall x (Apetalous(x) and Unscathed(x) -> Foolproof(x))\n\nnot Invincible(giorgio)\n\ntherefore Invincible(giorgio)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Archy is extreme. Archy is xxxvi. Archy is pediatric. Georgiana is xxxvi. Georgiana is pediatric. Georgiana is fierce. Ginni is extreme. Ginni is xxxvi. Wilona is xxxvi. Wilona is hooked. Kind, extreme things are hooked. Quiet, xxxvi things are hundredth. Smart, extreme things are audenesque. Wilona is hundredth.", "logic": "\nExtreme(archy)\nXxxvi(archy)\nPediatric(archy)\nXxxvi(georgiana)\nPediatric(georgiana)\nFierce(georgiana)\nExtreme(ginni)\nXxxvi(ginni)\nXxxvi(wilona)\nHooked(wilona)\nforall x (Pediatric(x) and Extreme(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) and Xxxvi(x) -> Hundredth(x))\nforall x (Hundredth(x) and Extreme(x) -> Audenesque(x))\n\nHundredth(wilona)\n\nHooked(wilona) and Xxxvi(wilona) and forall x (Hooked(x) and Xxxvi(x) -> Hundredth(x)) -> therefore Hundredth(wilona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Kerstin is angulate. Kerstin is braided. Kerstin is snuff. Jennica is braided. Jennica is snuff. Jennica is autogamic. Nick is angulate. Nick is braided. Audrie is braided. Audrie is cordate. Kind, angulate things are cordate. Quiet, braided things are chintzy. Smart, angulate things are lxxiii. Kerstin is not cordate.", "logic": "\nAngulate(kerstin)\nBraided(kerstin)\nSnuff(kerstin)\nBraided(jennica)\nSnuff(jennica)\nAutogamic(jennica)\nAngulate(nick)\nBraided(nick)\nBraided(audrie)\nCordate(audrie)\nforall x (Snuff(x) and Angulate(x) -> Cordate(x))\nforall x (Cordate(x) and Braided(x) -> Chintzy(x))\nforall x (Chintzy(x) and Angulate(x) -> Lxxiii(x))\n\nnot Cordate(kerstin)\n\nSnuff(kerstin) and Angulate(kerstin) and forall x (Snuff(x) and Angulate(x) -> Cordate(x)) -> therefore Cordate(kerstin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Davie is apocryphal. Davie is unhatched. Davie is uncleared. Hagen is unhatched. Hagen is uncleared. Hagen is clustered. Tasha is apocryphal. Tasha is unhatched. Myrtia is unhatched. Myrtia is simulated. Kind, apocryphal things are simulated. Quiet, unhatched things are branchy. Smart, apocryphal things are pancreatic. Davie is branchy.", "logic": "\nApocryphal(davie)\nUnhatched(davie)\nUncleared(davie)\nUnhatched(hagen)\nUncleared(hagen)\nClustered(hagen)\nApocryphal(tasha)\nUnhatched(tasha)\nUnhatched(myrtia)\nSimulated(myrtia)\nforall x (Uncleared(x) and Apocryphal(x) -> Simulated(x))\nforall x (Simulated(x) and Unhatched(x) -> Branchy(x))\nforall x (Branchy(x) and Apocryphal(x) -> Pancreatic(x))\n\nBranchy(davie)\n\nUncleared(davie) and Apocryphal(davie) and forall x (Uncleared(x) and Apocryphal(x) -> Simulated(x)) -> therefore Simulated(davie) Simulated(davie) and Unhatched(davie) and forall x (Simulated(x) and Unhatched(x) -> Branchy(x)) -> therefore Branchy(davie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Doug is ninefold. Doug is chartless. Doug is puppylike. Franky is chartless. Franky is puppylike. Franky is murdered. Daune is ninefold. Daune is chartless. Garwood is chartless. Garwood is tensile. Kind, ninefold things are tensile. Quiet, chartless things are homebound. Smart, ninefold things are evaluative. Doug is not homebound.", "logic": "\nNinefold(doug)\nChartless(doug)\nPuppylike(doug)\nChartless(franky)\nPuppylike(franky)\nMurdered(franky)\nNinefold(daune)\nChartless(daune)\nChartless(garwood)\nTensile(garwood)\nforall x (Puppylike(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Tensile(x))\nforall x (Tensile(x) and Chartless(x) -> Homebound(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Evaluative(x))\n\nnot Homebound(doug)\n\nPuppylike(doug) and Ninefold(doug) and forall x (Puppylike(x) and Ninefold(x) -> Tensile(x)) -> therefore Tensile(doug) Tensile(doug) and Chartless(doug) and forall x (Tensile(x) and Chartless(x) -> Homebound(x)) -> therefore Homebound(doug)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Kalila is potable. Kalila is hangdog. Kalila is missed. Bessy is hangdog. Bessy is missed. Bessy is centrist. Tracy is potable. Tracy is hangdog. Jere is hangdog. Jere is coaxal. Kind, potable things are coaxal. Quiet, hangdog things are venezuelan. Smart, potable things are hundred. Kalila is hundred.", "logic": "\nPotable(kalila)\nHangdog(kalila)\nMissed(kalila)\nHangdog(bessy)\nMissed(bessy)\nCentrist(bessy)\nPotable(tracy)\nHangdog(tracy)\nHangdog(jere)\nCoaxal(jere)\nforall x (Missed(x) and Potable(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Coaxal(x) and Hangdog(x) -> Venezuelan(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and Potable(x) -> Hundred(x))\n\nHundred(kalila)\n\nMissed(kalila) and Potable(kalila) and forall x (Missed(x) and Potable(x) -> Coaxal(x)) -> therefore Coaxal(kalila) Coaxal(kalila) and Hangdog(kalila) and forall x (Coaxal(x) and Hangdog(x) -> Venezuelan(x)) -> therefore Venezuelan(kalila) Venezuelan(kalila) and Potable(kalila) and forall x (Venezuelan(x) and Potable(x) -> Hundred(x)) -> therefore Hundred(kalila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Michele is shopworn. Michele is raining. Michele is previous. Eduard is raining. Eduard is previous. Eduard is luxurious. Damian is shopworn. Damian is raining. Harriot is raining. Harriot is tamable. Kind, shopworn things are tamable. Quiet, raining things are gallic. Smart, shopworn things are stuffy. Michele is not stuffy.", "logic": "\nShopworn(michele)\nRaining(michele)\nPrevious(michele)\nRaining(eduard)\nPrevious(eduard)\nLuxurious(eduard)\nShopworn(damian)\nRaining(damian)\nRaining(harriot)\nTamable(harriot)\nforall x (Previous(x) and Shopworn(x) -> Tamable(x))\nforall x (Tamable(x) and Raining(x) -> Gallic(x))\nforall x (Gallic(x) and Shopworn(x) -> Stuffy(x))\n\nnot Stuffy(michele)\n\nPrevious(michele) and Shopworn(michele) and forall x (Previous(x) and Shopworn(x) -> Tamable(x)) -> therefore Tamable(michele) Tamable(michele) and Raining(michele) and forall x (Tamable(x) and Raining(x) -> Gallic(x)) -> therefore Gallic(michele) Gallic(michele) and Shopworn(michele) and forall x (Gallic(x) and Shopworn(x) -> Stuffy(x)) -> therefore Stuffy(michele)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Gaven is tapering. Gaven is critical. Gaven is citric. Anastasia is critical. Anastasia is citric. Anastasia is wrothful. Hersh is tapering. Hersh is critical. Sibyl is critical. Sibyl is siouan. Kind, tapering things are siouan. Quiet, critical things are libyan. Smart, tapering things are decorative. Anastasia is not decorative.", "logic": "\nTapering(gaven)\nCritical(gaven)\nCitric(gaven)\nCritical(anastasia)\nCitric(anastasia)\nWrothful(anastasia)\nTapering(hersh)\nCritical(hersh)\nCritical(sibyl)\nSiouan(sibyl)\nforall x (Citric(x) and Tapering(x) -> Siouan(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) and Critical(x) -> Libyan(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) and Tapering(x) -> Decorative(x))\n\nnot Decorative(anastasia)\n\nforall x (Libyan(x) and Tapering(x) -> Decorative(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Calli is biloculate. Calli is repeatable. Calli is rushed. Adey is repeatable. Adey is rushed. Adey is rotational. Curtice is biloculate. Curtice is repeatable. Gipsy is repeatable. Gipsy is embattled. Kind, biloculate things are embattled. Quiet, repeatable things are oval. Smart, biloculate things are discordant. Curtice is oval.", "logic": "\nBiloculate(calli)\nRepeatable(calli)\nRushed(calli)\nRepeatable(adey)\nRushed(adey)\nRotational(adey)\nBiloculate(curtice)\nRepeatable(curtice)\nRepeatable(gipsy)\nEmbattled(gipsy)\nforall x (Rushed(x) and Biloculate(x) -> Embattled(x))\nforall x (Embattled(x) and Repeatable(x) -> Oval(x))\nforall x (Oval(x) and Biloculate(x) -> Discordant(x))\n\nOval(curtice)\n\nforall x (Embattled(x) and Repeatable(x) -> Oval(x)) <- forall x (Rushed(x) and Biloculate(x) -> Embattled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Irvin is oldline. Irvin is groggy. Irvin is impartial. Helaina is groggy. Helaina is impartial. Helaina is cashable. Malva is oldline. Malva is groggy. Renate is groggy. Renate is fertile. Kind, oldline things are fertile. Quiet, groggy things are anoestrous. Smart, oldline things are dutch. Helaina is not fertile.", "logic": "\nOldline(irvin)\nGroggy(irvin)\nImpartial(irvin)\nGroggy(helaina)\nImpartial(helaina)\nCashable(helaina)\nOldline(malva)\nGroggy(malva)\nGroggy(renate)\nFertile(renate)\nforall x (Impartial(x) and Oldline(x) -> Fertile(x))\nforall x (Fertile(x) and Groggy(x) -> Anoestrous(x))\nforall x (Anoestrous(x) and Oldline(x) -> Dutch(x))\n\nnot Fertile(helaina)\n\nforall x (Impartial(x) and Oldline(x) -> Fertile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Flory is incipient. Flory is eolotropic. Flory is exculpated. Perceval is eolotropic. Perceval is exculpated. Perceval is customary. Genni is incipient. Genni is eolotropic. Robenia is eolotropic. Robenia is lucifugous. Kind, incipient things are lucifugous. Quiet, eolotropic things are latter. Smart, incipient things are neat. Genni is lucifugous.", "logic": "\nIncipient(flory)\nEolotropic(flory)\nExculpated(flory)\nEolotropic(perceval)\nExculpated(perceval)\nCustomary(perceval)\nIncipient(genni)\nEolotropic(genni)\nEolotropic(robenia)\nLucifugous(robenia)\nforall x (Exculpated(x) and Incipient(x) -> Lucifugous(x))\nforall x (Lucifugous(x) and Eolotropic(x) -> Latter(x))\nforall x (Latter(x) and Incipient(x) -> Neat(x))\n\nLucifugous(genni)\n\nforall x (Exculpated(x) and Incipient(x) -> Lucifugous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Gilles is usurious. Gilles is clitoric. Gilles is burled. Maxy is clitoric. Maxy is burled. Maxy is indiscreet. Simone is usurious. Simone is clitoric. Theodora is clitoric. Theodora is soleless. Kind, usurious things are soleless. Quiet, clitoric things are docile. Smart, usurious things are fleeting. Theodora is not burled.", "logic": "\nUsurious(gilles)\nClitoric(gilles)\nBurled(gilles)\nClitoric(maxy)\nBurled(maxy)\nIndiscreet(maxy)\nUsurious(simone)\nClitoric(simone)\nClitoric(theodora)\nSoleless(theodora)\nforall x (Burled(x) and Usurious(x) -> Soleless(x))\nforall x (Soleless(x) and Clitoric(x) -> Docile(x))\nforall x (Docile(x) and Usurious(x) -> Fleeting(x))\n\nnot Burled(theodora)\n\nnot Burled(theodora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Adrien is unrequited. Adrien is jammed. Adrien is polytonal. Edin is jammed. Edin is polytonal. Edin is preclusive. Persis is unrequited. Persis is jammed. Debby is jammed. Debby is lifelike. Kind, unrequited things are lifelike. Quiet, jammed things are liberated. Smart, unrequited things are unreached. Persis is polytonal.", "logic": "\nUnrequited(adrien)\nJammed(adrien)\nPolytonal(adrien)\nJammed(edin)\nPolytonal(edin)\nPreclusive(edin)\nUnrequited(persis)\nJammed(persis)\nJammed(debby)\nLifelike(debby)\nforall x (Polytonal(x) and Unrequited(x) -> Lifelike(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) and Jammed(x) -> Liberated(x))\nforall x (Liberated(x) and Unrequited(x) -> Unreached(x))\n\nPolytonal(persis)\n\nPolytonal(persis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Timmie is unrealized. Timmie is iridic. Timmie is teenage. Jilly is iridic. Jilly is teenage. Jilly is modified. Dougie is unrealized. Dougie is iridic. Aida is iridic. Aida is variant. Kind, unrealized things are variant. Quiet, iridic things are binocular. Smart, unrealized things are cubiform. Aida is not unrealized.", "logic": "\nUnrealized(timmie)\nIridic(timmie)\nTeenage(timmie)\nIridic(jilly)\nTeenage(jilly)\nModified(jilly)\nUnrealized(dougie)\nIridic(dougie)\nIridic(aida)\nVariant(aida)\nforall x (Teenage(x) and Unrealized(x) -> Variant(x))\nforall x (Variant(x) and Iridic(x) -> Binocular(x))\nforall x (Binocular(x) and Unrealized(x) -> Cubiform(x))\n\nnot Unrealized(aida)\n\nnot Unrealized(aida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "Grissel is outlined. Grissel is patched. Grissel is normative. Mack is patched. Mack is normative. Mack is murdered. Melisenda is outlined. Melisenda is patched. Luci is patched. Luci is obsessed. Kind, outlined things are obsessed. Quiet, patched things are augmented. Smart, outlined things are fiddling. Melisenda is murdered.", "logic": "\nOutlined(grissel)\nPatched(grissel)\nNormative(grissel)\nPatched(mack)\nNormative(mack)\nMurdered(mack)\nOutlined(melisenda)\nPatched(melisenda)\nPatched(luci)\nObsessed(luci)\nforall x (Normative(x) and Outlined(x) -> Obsessed(x))\nforall x (Obsessed(x) and Patched(x) -> Augmented(x))\nforall x (Augmented(x) and Outlined(x) -> Fiddling(x))\n\nMurdered(melisenda)\n\nMurdered(melisenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-130"} {"premises": "The maury scold the noni. The maury is worshipped. The maury balkanize the catherine. The noni is mitral. The catherine basify the maury. The catherine scold the noni. The catherine is legible. If something scold the noni and the noni is bosomed then it is worshipped. If something balkanize the maury then it scold the maury. If something is bosomed then it balkanize the maury. If something basify the maury then the maury scold the catherine. If the noni scold the catherine then the noni balkanize the maury. If something scold the noni then the noni scold the maury. The catherine basify the maury.", "logic": "\nScold(maury, noni)\nWorshipped(maury)\nBalkanize(maury, catherine)\nMitral(noni)\nBasify(catherine, maury)\nScold(catherine, noni)\nLegible(catherine)\nforall x (Scold(x, noni) and Bosomed(noni) -> Worshipped(x))\nforall x (Balkanize(x, maury) -> Scold(x, maury))\nforall x (Bosomed(x) -> Balkanize(x, maury))\nforall x (Basify(x, maury) -> Scold(maury, catherine))\nScold(noni, catherine) -> Balkanize(noni, maury)\nforall x (Scold(x, noni) -> Scold(noni, maury))\n\nBasify(catherine, maury)\n\ntherefore Basify(catherine, maury)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The ema scorn the woody. The ema is jihadi. The ema blacktop the roanna. The woody is verbose. The roanna entail the ema. The roanna scorn the woody. The roanna is sickly. If something scorn the woody and the woody is emerging then it is jihadi. If something blacktop the ema then it scorn the ema. If something is emerging then it blacktop the ema. If something entail the ema then the ema scorn the roanna. If the woody scorn the roanna then the woody blacktop the ema. If something scorn the woody then the woody scorn the ema. The ema does not eat the woody.", "logic": "\nScorn(ema, woody)\nJihadi(ema)\nBlacktop(ema, roanna)\nVerbose(woody)\nEntail(roanna, ema)\nScorn(roanna, woody)\nSickly(roanna)\nforall x (Scorn(x, woody) and Emerging(woody) -> Jihadi(x))\nforall x (Blacktop(x, ema) -> Scorn(x, ema))\nforall x (Emerging(x) -> Blacktop(x, ema))\nforall x (Entail(x, ema) -> Scorn(ema, roanna))\nScorn(woody, roanna) -> Blacktop(woody, ema)\nforall x (Scorn(x, woody) -> Scorn(woody, ema))\n\nnot Scorn(ema, woody)\n\ntherefore Scorn(ema, woody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The arturo pepper the annabell. The arturo is gushing. The arturo vellicate the giffy. The annabell is endodontic. The giffy corrade the arturo. The giffy pepper the annabell. The giffy is stepwise. If something pepper the annabell and the annabell is palladian then it is gushing. If something vellicate the arturo then it pepper the arturo. If something is palladian then it vellicate the arturo. If something corrade the arturo then the arturo pepper the giffy. If the annabell pepper the giffy then the annabell vellicate the arturo. If something pepper the annabell then the annabell pepper the arturo. The annabell pepper the arturo.", "logic": "\nPepper(arturo, annabell)\nGushing(arturo)\nVellicate(arturo, giffy)\nEndodontic(annabell)\nCorrade(giffy, arturo)\nPepper(giffy, annabell)\nStepwise(giffy)\nforall x (Pepper(x, annabell) and Palladian(annabell) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Vellicate(x, arturo) -> Pepper(x, arturo))\nforall x (Palladian(x) -> Vellicate(x, arturo))\nforall x (Corrade(x, arturo) -> Pepper(arturo, giffy))\nPepper(annabell, giffy) -> Vellicate(annabell, arturo)\nforall x (Pepper(x, annabell) -> Pepper(annabell, arturo))\n\nPepper(annabell, arturo)\n\nPepper(arturo, annabell) and forall x (Pepper(x, annabell) -> Pepper(annabell, arturo)) -> therefore Pepper(annabell, arturo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The charissa harness the codie. The charissa is revenant. The charissa give the clementia. The codie is cecal. The clementia blat the charissa. The clementia harness the codie. The clementia is whitened. If something harness the codie and the codie is unsalted then it is revenant. If something give the charissa then it harness the charissa. If something is unsalted then it give the charissa. If something blat the charissa then the charissa harness the clementia. If the codie harness the clementia then the codie give the charissa. If something harness the codie then the codie harness the charissa. The charissa does not eat the clementia.", "logic": "\nHarness(charissa, codie)\nRevenant(charissa)\nGive(charissa, clementia)\nCecal(codie)\nBlat(clementia, charissa)\nHarness(clementia, codie)\nWhitened(clementia)\nforall x (Harness(x, codie) and Unsalted(codie) -> Revenant(x))\nforall x (Give(x, charissa) -> Harness(x, charissa))\nforall x (Unsalted(x) -> Give(x, charissa))\nforall x (Blat(x, charissa) -> Harness(charissa, clementia))\nHarness(codie, clementia) -> Give(codie, charissa)\nforall x (Harness(x, codie) -> Harness(codie, charissa))\n\nnot Harness(charissa, clementia)\n\nBlat(clementia, charissa) and forall x (Blat(x, charissa) -> Harness(charissa, clementia)) -> therefore Harness(charissa, clementia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The emmy enumerate the french. The emmy is refreshed. The emmy causeway the kristyn. The french is axenic. The kristyn signalise the emmy. The kristyn enumerate the french. The kristyn is ecumenical. If something enumerate the french and the french is apodal then it is refreshed. If something causeway the emmy then it enumerate the emmy. If something is apodal then it causeway the emmy. If something signalise the emmy then the emmy enumerate the kristyn. If the french enumerate the kristyn then the french causeway the emmy. If something enumerate the french then the french enumerate the emmy. The emmy does not see the emmy.", "logic": "\nEnumerate(emmy, french)\nRefreshed(emmy)\nCauseway(emmy, kristyn)\nAxenic(french)\nSignalise(kristyn, emmy)\nEnumerate(kristyn, french)\nEcumenical(kristyn)\nforall x (Enumerate(x, french) and Apodal(french) -> Refreshed(x))\nforall x (Causeway(x, emmy) -> Enumerate(x, emmy))\nforall x (Apodal(x) -> Causeway(x, emmy))\nforall x (Signalise(x, emmy) -> Enumerate(emmy, kristyn))\nEnumerate(french, kristyn) -> Causeway(french, emmy)\nforall x (Enumerate(x, french) -> Enumerate(french, emmy))\n\nnot Causeway(emmy, emmy)\n\nforall x (Apodal(x) -> Causeway(x, emmy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The elicia canalise the kenyon. The elicia is basidial. The elicia parole the howard. The kenyon is basilar. The howard overprice the elicia. The howard canalise the kenyon. The howard is bleary. If something canalise the kenyon and the kenyon is pertinent then it is basidial. If something parole the elicia then it canalise the elicia. If something is pertinent then it parole the elicia. If something overprice the elicia then the elicia canalise the howard. If the kenyon canalise the howard then the kenyon parole the elicia. If something canalise the kenyon then the kenyon canalise the elicia. The howard parole the elicia.", "logic": "\nCanalise(elicia, kenyon)\nBasidial(elicia)\nParole(elicia, howard)\nBasilar(kenyon)\nOverprice(howard, elicia)\nCanalise(howard, kenyon)\nBleary(howard)\nforall x (Canalise(x, kenyon) and Pertinent(kenyon) -> Basidial(x))\nforall x (Parole(x, elicia) -> Canalise(x, elicia))\nforall x (Pertinent(x) -> Parole(x, elicia))\nforall x (Overprice(x, elicia) -> Canalise(elicia, howard))\nCanalise(kenyon, howard) -> Parole(kenyon, elicia)\nforall x (Canalise(x, kenyon) -> Canalise(kenyon, elicia))\n\nParole(howard, elicia)\n\nforall x (Pertinent(x) -> Parole(x, elicia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The sharie waste the baily. The sharie is sunless. The sharie fowl the karon. The baily is unmined. The karon camp the sharie. The karon waste the baily. The karon is lacerated. If something waste the baily and the baily is taboo then it is sunless. If something fowl the sharie then it waste the sharie. If something is taboo then it fowl the sharie. If something camp the sharie then the sharie waste the karon. If the baily waste the karon then the baily fowl the sharie. If something waste the baily then the baily waste the sharie. The baily does not see the baily.", "logic": "\nWaste(sharie, baily)\nSunless(sharie)\nFowl(sharie, karon)\nUnmined(baily)\nCamp(karon, sharie)\nWaste(karon, baily)\nLacerated(karon)\nforall x (Waste(x, baily) and Taboo(baily) -> Sunless(x))\nforall x (Fowl(x, sharie) -> Waste(x, sharie))\nforall x (Taboo(x) -> Fowl(x, sharie))\nforall x (Camp(x, sharie) -> Waste(sharie, karon))\nWaste(baily, karon) -> Fowl(baily, sharie)\nforall x (Waste(x, baily) -> Waste(baily, sharie))\n\nnot Fowl(baily, baily)\n\nnot Fowl(baily, baily) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The vince flog the durante. The vince is wearisome. The vince shovel the clementia. The durante is rotational. The clementia fling the vince. The clementia flog the durante. The clementia is salmon. If something flog the durante and the durante is gummed then it is wearisome. If something shovel the vince then it flog the vince. If something is gummed then it shovel the vince. If something fling the vince then the vince flog the clementia. If the durante flog the clementia then the durante shovel the vince. If something flog the durante then the durante flog the vince. The durante is green.", "logic": "\nFlog(vince, durante)\nWearisome(vince)\nShovel(vince, clementia)\nRotational(durante)\nFling(clementia, vince)\nFlog(clementia, durante)\nSalmon(clementia)\nforall x (Flog(x, durante) and Gummed(durante) -> Wearisome(x))\nforall x (Shovel(x, vince) -> Flog(x, vince))\nforall x (Gummed(x) -> Shovel(x, vince))\nforall x (Fling(x, vince) -> Flog(vince, clementia))\nFlog(durante, clementia) -> Shovel(durante, vince)\nforall x (Flog(x, durante) -> Flog(durante, vince))\n\nGreen(durante)\n\nGreen(durante) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-2913"} {"premises": "The pieter jostle the agnese. The omar jostle the agnese. The agnese whet the omar. If something unstrap the pieter then the pieter is alaskan. If something whet the omar then it unstrap the pieter. If something is alaskan and it jostle the agnese then it unstrap the agnese. If something whet the pieter then it is idiopathic. If something whet the omar then it is idiopathic. If something unstrap the omar then it unstrap the pieter. If something is idiopathic then it jostle the omar. If something jostle the agnese then the agnese unstrap the pieter. The omar jostle the agnese.", "logic": "\nJostle(pieter, agnese)\nJostle(omar, agnese)\nWhet(agnese, omar)\nforall x (Unstrap(x, pieter) -> Alaskan(pieter))\nforall x (Whet(x, omar) -> Unstrap(x, pieter))\nforall x (Alaskan(x) and Jostle(x, agnese) -> Unstrap(x, agnese))\nforall x (Whet(x, pieter) -> Idiopathic(x))\nforall x (Whet(x, omar) -> Idiopathic(x))\nforall x (Unstrap(x, omar) -> Unstrap(x, pieter))\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) -> Jostle(x, omar))\nforall x (Jostle(x, agnese) -> Unstrap(agnese, pieter))\n\nJostle(omar, agnese)\n\ntherefore Jostle(omar, agnese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The bernd immix the goldina. The kirsten immix the goldina. The goldina initial the kirsten. If something swipe the bernd then the bernd is dilettante. If something initial the kirsten then it swipe the bernd. If something is dilettante and it immix the goldina then it swipe the goldina. If something initial the bernd then it is tubal. If something initial the kirsten then it is tubal. If something swipe the kirsten then it swipe the bernd. If something is tubal then it immix the kirsten. If something immix the goldina then the goldina swipe the bernd. The kirsten does not like the goldina.", "logic": "\nImmix(bernd, goldina)\nImmix(kirsten, goldina)\nInitial(goldina, kirsten)\nforall x (Swipe(x, bernd) -> Dilettante(bernd))\nforall x (Initial(x, kirsten) -> Swipe(x, bernd))\nforall x (Dilettante(x) and Immix(x, goldina) -> Swipe(x, goldina))\nforall x (Initial(x, bernd) -> Tubal(x))\nforall x (Initial(x, kirsten) -> Tubal(x))\nforall x (Swipe(x, kirsten) -> Swipe(x, bernd))\nforall x (Tubal(x) -> Immix(x, kirsten))\nforall x (Immix(x, goldina) -> Swipe(goldina, bernd))\n\nnot Immix(kirsten, goldina)\n\ntherefore Immix(kirsten, goldina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The dierdre encumber the ehud. The marilee encumber the ehud. The ehud jinx the marilee. If something bestialize the dierdre then the dierdre is obedient. If something jinx the marilee then it bestialize the dierdre. If something is obedient and it encumber the ehud then it bestialize the ehud. If something jinx the dierdre then it is allantoic. If something jinx the marilee then it is allantoic. If something bestialize the marilee then it bestialize the dierdre. If something is allantoic then it encumber the marilee. If something encumber the ehud then the ehud bestialize the dierdre. The ehud is allantoic.", "logic": "\nEncumber(dierdre, ehud)\nEncumber(marilee, ehud)\nJinx(ehud, marilee)\nforall x (Bestialize(x, dierdre) -> Obedient(dierdre))\nforall x (Jinx(x, marilee) -> Bestialize(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Obedient(x) and Encumber(x, ehud) -> Bestialize(x, ehud))\nforall x (Jinx(x, dierdre) -> Allantoic(x))\nforall x (Jinx(x, marilee) -> Allantoic(x))\nforall x (Bestialize(x, marilee) -> Bestialize(x, dierdre))\nforall x (Allantoic(x) -> Encumber(x, marilee))\nforall x (Encumber(x, ehud) -> Bestialize(ehud, dierdre))\n\nAllantoic(ehud)\n\nJinx(ehud, marilee) and forall x (Jinx(x, marilee) -> Allantoic(x)) -> therefore Allantoic(ehud)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The lori reseal the torrey. The judson reseal the torrey. The torrey spotweld the judson. If something underspend the lori then the lori is sonant. If something spotweld the judson then it underspend the lori. If something is sonant and it reseal the torrey then it underspend the torrey. If something spotweld the lori then it is perfumed. If something spotweld the judson then it is perfumed. If something underspend the judson then it underspend the lori. If something is perfumed then it reseal the judson. If something reseal the torrey then the torrey underspend the lori. The torrey does not see the lori.", "logic": "\nReseal(lori, torrey)\nReseal(judson, torrey)\nSpotweld(torrey, judson)\nforall x (Underspend(x, lori) -> Sonant(lori))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, judson) -> Underspend(x, lori))\nforall x (Sonant(x) and Reseal(x, torrey) -> Underspend(x, torrey))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, lori) -> Perfumed(x))\nforall x (Spotweld(x, judson) -> Perfumed(x))\nforall x (Underspend(x, judson) -> Underspend(x, lori))\nforall x (Perfumed(x) -> Reseal(x, judson))\nforall x (Reseal(x, torrey) -> Underspend(torrey, lori))\n\nnot Underspend(torrey, lori)\n\nReseal(lori, torrey) and forall x (Reseal(x, torrey) -> Underspend(torrey, lori)) -> therefore Underspend(torrey, lori)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The thomasine minify the kristyn. The colleen minify the kristyn. The kristyn lube the colleen. If something splatter the thomasine then the thomasine is gutless. If something lube the colleen then it splatter the thomasine. If something is gutless and it minify the kristyn then it splatter the kristyn. If something lube the thomasine then it is neural. If something lube the colleen then it is neural. If something splatter the colleen then it splatter the thomasine. If something is neural then it minify the colleen. If something minify the kristyn then the kristyn splatter the thomasine. The kristyn minify the colleen.", "logic": "\nMinify(thomasine, kristyn)\nMinify(colleen, kristyn)\nLube(kristyn, colleen)\nforall x (Splatter(x, thomasine) -> Gutless(thomasine))\nforall x (Lube(x, colleen) -> Splatter(x, thomasine))\nforall x (Gutless(x) and Minify(x, kristyn) -> Splatter(x, kristyn))\nforall x (Lube(x, thomasine) -> Neural(x))\nforall x (Lube(x, colleen) -> Neural(x))\nforall x (Splatter(x, colleen) -> Splatter(x, thomasine))\nforall x (Neural(x) -> Minify(x, colleen))\nforall x (Minify(x, kristyn) -> Splatter(kristyn, thomasine))\n\nMinify(kristyn, colleen)\n\nLube(kristyn, colleen) and forall x (Lube(x, colleen) -> Neural(x)) -> therefore Neural(kristyn) Neural(kristyn) and forall x (Neural(x) -> Minify(x, colleen)) -> therefore Minify(kristyn, colleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The rubie budget the delia. The corenda budget the delia. The delia melanize the corenda. If something avianise the rubie then the rubie is rhomboidal. If something melanize the corenda then it avianise the rubie. If something is rhomboidal and it budget the delia then it avianise the delia. If something melanize the rubie then it is relevant. If something melanize the corenda then it is relevant. If something avianise the corenda then it avianise the rubie. If something is relevant then it budget the corenda. If something budget the delia then the delia avianise the rubie. The rubie is not rhomboidal.", "logic": "\nBudget(rubie, delia)\nBudget(corenda, delia)\nMelanize(delia, corenda)\nforall x (Avianise(x, rubie) -> Rhomboidal(rubie))\nforall x (Melanize(x, corenda) -> Avianise(x, rubie))\nforall x (Rhomboidal(x) and Budget(x, delia) -> Avianise(x, delia))\nforall x (Melanize(x, rubie) -> Relevant(x))\nforall x (Melanize(x, corenda) -> Relevant(x))\nforall x (Avianise(x, corenda) -> Avianise(x, rubie))\nforall x (Relevant(x) -> Budget(x, corenda))\nforall x (Budget(x, delia) -> Avianise(delia, rubie))\n\nnot Rhomboidal(rubie)\n\nBudget(rubie, delia) and forall x (Budget(x, delia) -> Avianise(delia, rubie)) -> therefore Avianise(delia, rubie) Avianise(delia, rubie) and forall x (Avianise(x, rubie) -> Rhomboidal(rubie)) -> therefore Rhomboidal(rubie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The joelynn ruckle the kristos. The vito ruckle the kristos. The kristos deceive the vito. If something grab the joelynn then the joelynn is unlivable. If something deceive the vito then it grab the joelynn. If something is unlivable and it ruckle the kristos then it grab the kristos. If something deceive the joelynn then it is immovable. If something deceive the vito then it is immovable. If something grab the vito then it grab the joelynn. If something is immovable then it ruckle the vito. If something ruckle the kristos then the kristos grab the joelynn. The joelynn grab the kristos.", "logic": "\nRuckle(joelynn, kristos)\nRuckle(vito, kristos)\nDeceive(kristos, vito)\nforall x (Grab(x, joelynn) -> Unlivable(joelynn))\nforall x (Deceive(x, vito) -> Grab(x, joelynn))\nforall x (Unlivable(x) and Ruckle(x, kristos) -> Grab(x, kristos))\nforall x (Deceive(x, joelynn) -> Immovable(x))\nforall x (Deceive(x, vito) -> Immovable(x))\nforall x (Grab(x, vito) -> Grab(x, joelynn))\nforall x (Immovable(x) -> Ruckle(x, vito))\nforall x (Ruckle(x, kristos) -> Grab(kristos, joelynn))\n\nGrab(joelynn, kristos)\n\nRuckle(joelynn, kristos) and forall x (Ruckle(x, kristos) -> Grab(kristos, joelynn)) -> therefore Grab(kristos, joelynn) Grab(kristos, joelynn) and forall x (Grab(x, joelynn) -> Unlivable(joelynn)) -> therefore Unlivable(joelynn) Unlivable(joelynn) and Ruckle(joelynn, kristos) and forall x (Unlivable(x) and Ruckle(x, kristos) -> Grab(x, kristos)) -> therefore Grab(joelynn, kristos)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The julia insufflate the oscar. The hedwig insufflate the oscar. The oscar draught the hedwig. If something sharpen the julia then the julia is hopeless. If something draught the hedwig then it sharpen the julia. If something is hopeless and it insufflate the oscar then it sharpen the oscar. If something draught the julia then it is cragfast. If something draught the hedwig then it is cragfast. If something sharpen the hedwig then it sharpen the julia. If something is cragfast then it insufflate the hedwig. If something insufflate the oscar then the oscar sharpen the julia. The julia does not see the oscar.", "logic": "\nInsufflate(julia, oscar)\nInsufflate(hedwig, oscar)\nDraught(oscar, hedwig)\nforall x (Sharpen(x, julia) -> Hopeless(julia))\nforall x (Draught(x, hedwig) -> Sharpen(x, julia))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) and Insufflate(x, oscar) -> Sharpen(x, oscar))\nforall x (Draught(x, julia) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Draught(x, hedwig) -> Cragfast(x))\nforall x (Sharpen(x, hedwig) -> Sharpen(x, julia))\nforall x (Cragfast(x) -> Insufflate(x, hedwig))\nforall x (Insufflate(x, oscar) -> Sharpen(oscar, julia))\n\nnot Sharpen(julia, oscar)\n\nInsufflate(julia, oscar) and forall x (Insufflate(x, oscar) -> Sharpen(oscar, julia)) -> therefore Sharpen(oscar, julia) Sharpen(oscar, julia) and forall x (Sharpen(x, julia) -> Hopeless(julia)) -> therefore Hopeless(julia) Hopeless(julia) and Insufflate(julia, oscar) and forall x (Hopeless(x) and Insufflate(x, oscar) -> Sharpen(x, oscar)) -> therefore Sharpen(julia, oscar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The jillian decoct the sadella. The cati decoct the sadella. The sadella overrate the cati. If something middle the jillian then the jillian is bugged. If something overrate the cati then it middle the jillian. If something is bugged and it decoct the sadella then it middle the sadella. If something overrate the jillian then it is superfine. If something overrate the cati then it is superfine. If something middle the cati then it middle the jillian. If something is superfine then it decoct the cati. If something decoct the sadella then the sadella middle the jillian. The jillian does not like the cati.", "logic": "\nDecoct(jillian, sadella)\nDecoct(cati, sadella)\nOverrate(sadella, cati)\nforall x (Middle(x, jillian) -> Bugged(jillian))\nforall x (Overrate(x, cati) -> Middle(x, jillian))\nforall x (Bugged(x) and Decoct(x, sadella) -> Middle(x, sadella))\nforall x (Overrate(x, jillian) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Overrate(x, cati) -> Superfine(x))\nforall x (Middle(x, cati) -> Middle(x, jillian))\nforall x (Superfine(x) -> Decoct(x, cati))\nforall x (Decoct(x, sadella) -> Middle(sadella, jillian))\n\nnot Decoct(jillian, cati)\n\nforall x (Superfine(x) -> Decoct(x, cati)) <- forall x (Overrate(x, jillian) -> Superfine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The abbe transpire the witold. The alonzo transpire the witold. The witold lick the alonzo. If something canker the abbe then the abbe is unionized. If something lick the alonzo then it canker the abbe. If something is unionized and it transpire the witold then it canker the witold. If something lick the abbe then it is caramel. If something lick the alonzo then it is caramel. If something canker the alonzo then it canker the abbe. If something is caramel then it transpire the alonzo. If something transpire the witold then the witold canker the abbe. The alonzo canker the abbe.", "logic": "\nTranspire(abbe, witold)\nTranspire(alonzo, witold)\nLick(witold, alonzo)\nforall x (Canker(x, abbe) -> Unionized(abbe))\nforall x (Lick(x, alonzo) -> Canker(x, abbe))\nforall x (Unionized(x) and Transpire(x, witold) -> Canker(x, witold))\nforall x (Lick(x, abbe) -> Caramel(x))\nforall x (Lick(x, alonzo) -> Caramel(x))\nforall x (Canker(x, alonzo) -> Canker(x, abbe))\nforall x (Caramel(x) -> Transpire(x, alonzo))\nforall x (Transpire(x, witold) -> Canker(witold, abbe))\n\nCanker(alonzo, abbe)\n\nforall x (Lick(x, alonzo) -> Canker(x, abbe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The mariana disunite the alicia. The orson disunite the alicia. The alicia move the orson. If something vitriol the mariana then the mariana is unseasoned. If something move the orson then it vitriol the mariana. If something is unseasoned and it disunite the alicia then it vitriol the alicia. If something move the mariana then it is likable. If something move the orson then it is likable. If something vitriol the orson then it vitriol the mariana. If something is likable then it disunite the orson. If something disunite the alicia then the alicia vitriol the mariana. The orson is not likable.", "logic": "\nDisunite(mariana, alicia)\nDisunite(orson, alicia)\nMove(alicia, orson)\nforall x (Vitriol(x, mariana) -> Unseasoned(mariana))\nforall x (Move(x, orson) -> Vitriol(x, mariana))\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) and Disunite(x, alicia) -> Vitriol(x, alicia))\nforall x (Move(x, mariana) -> Likable(x))\nforall x (Move(x, orson) -> Likable(x))\nforall x (Vitriol(x, orson) -> Vitriol(x, mariana))\nforall x (Likable(x) -> Disunite(x, orson))\nforall x (Disunite(x, alicia) -> Vitriol(alicia, mariana))\n\nnot Likable(orson)\n\nforall x (Move(x, mariana) -> Likable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The viole confirm the julienne. The charline confirm the julienne. The julienne coffin the charline. If something demist the viole then the viole is yeatsian. If something coffin the charline then it demist the viole. If something is yeatsian and it confirm the julienne then it demist the julienne. If something coffin the viole then it is uppish. If something coffin the charline then it is uppish. If something demist the charline then it demist the viole. If something is uppish then it confirm the charline. If something confirm the julienne then the julienne demist the viole. The julienne demist the julienne.", "logic": "\nConfirm(viole, julienne)\nConfirm(charline, julienne)\nCoffin(julienne, charline)\nforall x (Demist(x, viole) -> Yeatsian(viole))\nforall x (Coffin(x, charline) -> Demist(x, viole))\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and Confirm(x, julienne) -> Demist(x, julienne))\nforall x (Coffin(x, viole) -> Uppish(x))\nforall x (Coffin(x, charline) -> Uppish(x))\nforall x (Demist(x, charline) -> Demist(x, viole))\nforall x (Uppish(x) -> Confirm(x, charline))\nforall x (Confirm(x, julienne) -> Demist(julienne, viole))\n\nDemist(julienne, julienne)\n\nforall x (Yeatsian(x) and Confirm(x, julienne) -> Demist(x, julienne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The imogene critique the aub. The dimitry critique the aub. The aub witch the dimitry. If something grip the imogene then the imogene is custom. If something witch the dimitry then it grip the imogene. If something is custom and it critique the aub then it grip the aub. If something witch the imogene then it is haemic. If something witch the dimitry then it is haemic. If something grip the dimitry then it grip the imogene. If something is haemic then it critique the dimitry. If something critique the aub then the aub grip the imogene. The imogene is not round.", "logic": "\nCritique(imogene, aub)\nCritique(dimitry, aub)\nWitch(aub, dimitry)\nforall x (Grip(x, imogene) -> Custom(imogene))\nforall x (Witch(x, dimitry) -> Grip(x, imogene))\nforall x (Custom(x) and Critique(x, aub) -> Grip(x, aub))\nforall x (Witch(x, imogene) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Witch(x, dimitry) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Grip(x, dimitry) -> Grip(x, imogene))\nforall x (Haemic(x) -> Critique(x, dimitry))\nforall x (Critique(x, aub) -> Grip(aub, imogene))\n\nnot Round(imogene)\n\nnot Round(imogene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The kristal pump the minni. The antonina pump the minni. The minni admit the antonina. If something join the kristal then the kristal is effeminate. If something admit the antonina then it join the kristal. If something is effeminate and it pump the minni then it join the minni. If something admit the kristal then it is taupe. If something admit the antonina then it is taupe. If something join the antonina then it join the kristal. If something is taupe then it pump the antonina. If something pump the minni then the minni join the kristal. The antonina is effeminate.", "logic": "\nPump(kristal, minni)\nPump(antonina, minni)\nAdmit(minni, antonina)\nforall x (Join(x, kristal) -> Effeminate(kristal))\nforall x (Admit(x, antonina) -> Join(x, kristal))\nforall x (Effeminate(x) and Pump(x, minni) -> Join(x, minni))\nforall x (Admit(x, kristal) -> Taupe(x))\nforall x (Admit(x, antonina) -> Taupe(x))\nforall x (Join(x, antonina) -> Join(x, kristal))\nforall x (Taupe(x) -> Pump(x, antonina))\nforall x (Pump(x, minni) -> Join(minni, kristal))\n\nEffeminate(antonina)\n\nEffeminate(antonina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The blinni prescribe the aguste. The pam prescribe the aguste. The aguste fair the pam. If something blackwash the blinni then the blinni is subnormal. If something fair the pam then it blackwash the blinni. If something is subnormal and it prescribe the aguste then it blackwash the aguste. If something fair the blinni then it is aware. If something fair the pam then it is aware. If something blackwash the pam then it blackwash the blinni. If something is aware then it prescribe the pam. If something prescribe the aguste then the aguste blackwash the blinni. The aguste does not see the pam.", "logic": "\nPrescribe(blinni, aguste)\nPrescribe(pam, aguste)\nFair(aguste, pam)\nforall x (Blackwash(x, blinni) -> Subnormal(blinni))\nforall x (Fair(x, pam) -> Blackwash(x, blinni))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) and Prescribe(x, aguste) -> Blackwash(x, aguste))\nforall x (Fair(x, blinni) -> Aware(x))\nforall x (Fair(x, pam) -> Aware(x))\nforall x (Blackwash(x, pam) -> Blackwash(x, blinni))\nforall x (Aware(x) -> Prescribe(x, pam))\nforall x (Prescribe(x, aguste) -> Blackwash(aguste, blinni))\n\nnot Blackwash(aguste, pam)\n\nnot Blackwash(aguste, pam) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "The adeline rectify the eolanda. The howie rectify the eolanda. The eolanda fulfil the howie. If something costume the adeline then the adeline is sourish. If something fulfil the howie then it costume the adeline. If something is sourish and it rectify the eolanda then it costume the eolanda. If something fulfil the adeline then it is vietnamese. If something fulfil the howie then it is vietnamese. If something costume the howie then it costume the adeline. If something is vietnamese then it rectify the howie. If something rectify the eolanda then the eolanda costume the adeline. The adeline is rough.", "logic": "\nRectify(adeline, eolanda)\nRectify(howie, eolanda)\nFulfil(eolanda, howie)\nforall x (Costume(x, adeline) -> Sourish(adeline))\nforall x (Fulfil(x, howie) -> Costume(x, adeline))\nforall x (Sourish(x) and Rectify(x, eolanda) -> Costume(x, eolanda))\nforall x (Fulfil(x, adeline) -> Vietnamese(x))\nforall x (Fulfil(x, howie) -> Vietnamese(x))\nforall x (Costume(x, howie) -> Costume(x, adeline))\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) -> Rectify(x, howie))\nforall x (Rectify(x, eolanda) -> Costume(eolanda, adeline))\n\nRough(adeline)\n\nRough(adeline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1221"} {"premises": "Jonas is swayback. Jonas is sluttish. Jonas is revengeful. Jonas is untrained. Jonas is yeasty. Jonas is sadducean. Joceline is swayback. Joceline is revengeful. Joceline is niggling. Joceline is yeasty. Ilise is swayback. Ilise is revengeful. Ilise is niggling. Ilise is yeasty. Ilise is sadducean. Round things are sadducean. All untrained things are swayback. If something is yeasty then it is untrained. Round things are yeasty. All swayback things are yeasty. All yeasty, sluttish things are revengeful. Joceline is niggling.", "logic": "\nSwayback(jonas)\nSluttish(jonas)\nRevengeful(jonas)\nUntrained(jonas)\nYeasty(jonas)\nSadducean(jonas)\nSwayback(joceline)\nRevengeful(joceline)\nNiggling(joceline)\nYeasty(joceline)\nSwayback(ilise)\nRevengeful(ilise)\nNiggling(ilise)\nYeasty(ilise)\nSadducean(ilise)\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Sadducean(x))\nforall x (Untrained(x) -> Swayback(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) -> Untrained(x))\nforall x (Niggling(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Swayback(x) -> Yeasty(x))\nforall x (Yeasty(x) and Sluttish(x) -> Revengeful(x))\n\nNiggling(joceline)\n\ntherefore Niggling(joceline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2012"} {"premises": "Ilene is meagre. Ilene is gladdened. Ilene is stenotic. Ilene is unreserved. Ilene is conventual. Ilene is mauritian. Samantha is meagre. Samantha is stenotic. Samantha is stippled. Samantha is conventual. Skye is meagre. Skye is stenotic. Skye is stippled. Skye is conventual. Skye is mauritian. Round things are mauritian. All unreserved things are meagre. If something is conventual then it is unreserved. Round things are conventual. All meagre things are conventual. All conventual, gladdened things are stenotic. Ilene is not conventual.", "logic": "\nMeagre(ilene)\nGladdened(ilene)\nStenotic(ilene)\nUnreserved(ilene)\nConventual(ilene)\nMauritian(ilene)\nMeagre(samantha)\nStenotic(samantha)\nStippled(samantha)\nConventual(samantha)\nMeagre(skye)\nStenotic(skye)\nStippled(skye)\nConventual(skye)\nMauritian(skye)\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Mauritian(x))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) -> Meagre(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) -> Unreserved(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Conventual(x))\nforall x (Meagre(x) -> Conventual(x))\nforall x (Conventual(x) and Gladdened(x) -> Stenotic(x))\n\nnot Conventual(ilene)\n\ntherefore Conventual(ilene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2012"} {"premises": "Jan is fuscous. Jan is voidable. Jan is cordiform. Jan is accrued. Jan is like. Jan is midwestern. Linnie is fuscous. Linnie is cordiform. Linnie is unobserved. Linnie is like. Midge is fuscous. Midge is cordiform. Midge is unobserved. Midge is like. Midge is midwestern. Round things are midwestern. All accrued things are fuscous. If something is like then it is accrued. Round things are like. All fuscous things are like. All like, voidable things are cordiform. Linnie is accrued.", "logic": "\nFuscous(jan)\nVoidable(jan)\nCordiform(jan)\nAccrued(jan)\nLike(jan)\nMidwestern(jan)\nFuscous(linnie)\nCordiform(linnie)\nUnobserved(linnie)\nLike(linnie)\nFuscous(midge)\nCordiform(midge)\nUnobserved(midge)\nLike(midge)\nMidwestern(midge)\nforall x (Unobserved(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nforall x (Accrued(x) -> Fuscous(x))\nforall x (Like(x) -> Accrued(x))\nforall x (Unobserved(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Fuscous(x) -> Like(x))\nforall x (Like(x) and Voidable(x) -> Cordiform(x))\n\nAccrued(linnie)\n\nLike(linnie) and forall x (Like(x) -> Accrued(x)) -> therefore Accrued(linnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2012"} {"premises": "Aubry is impartial. Aubry is nonverbal. Aubry is cresson. Aubry is telescoped. Aubry is halfway. Aubry is clonic. Essa is impartial. Essa is cresson. Essa is upscale. Essa is halfway. Ludwig is impartial. Ludwig is cresson. Ludwig is upscale. Ludwig is halfway. Ludwig is clonic. Round things are clonic. All telescoped things are impartial. If something is halfway then it is telescoped. Round things are halfway. All impartial things are halfway. All halfway, nonverbal things are cresson. Essa is not telescoped.", "logic": "\nImpartial(aubry)\nNonverbal(aubry)\nCresson(aubry)\nTelescoped(aubry)\nHalfway(aubry)\nClonic(aubry)\nImpartial(essa)\nCresson(essa)\nUpscale(essa)\nHalfway(essa)\nImpartial(ludwig)\nCresson(ludwig)\nUpscale(ludwig)\nHalfway(ludwig)\nClonic(ludwig)\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Clonic(x))\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Impartial(x))\nforall x (Halfway(x) -> Telescoped(x))\nforall x (Upscale(x) -> Halfway(x))\nforall x (Impartial(x) -> Halfway(x))\nforall x (Halfway(x) and Nonverbal(x) -> Cresson(x))\n\nnot Telescoped(essa)\n\nHalfway(essa) and forall x (Halfway(x) -> Telescoped(x)) -> therefore Telescoped(essa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2012"} {"premises": "Briana is gordian. Briana is assignable. Briana is unrested. Briana is steamed. Briana is movable. Briana is undated. Shirl is gordian. Shirl is unrested. Shirl is principal. Shirl is movable. Woodie is gordian. Woodie is unrested. Woodie is principal. Woodie is movable. Woodie is undated. Round things are undated. All steamed things are gordian. If something is movable then it is steamed. Round things are movable. All gordian things are movable. All movable, assignable things are unrested. Briana is not principal.", "logic": "\nGordian(briana)\nAssignable(briana)\nUnrested(briana)\nSteamed(briana)\nMovable(briana)\nUndated(briana)\nGordian(shirl)\nUnrested(shirl)\nPrincipal(shirl)\nMovable(shirl)\nGordian(woodie)\nUnrested(woodie)\nPrincipal(woodie)\nMovable(woodie)\nUndated(woodie)\nforall x (Principal(x) -> Undated(x))\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Gordian(x))\nforall x (Movable(x) -> Steamed(x))\nforall x (Principal(x) -> Movable(x))\nforall x (Gordian(x) -> Movable(x))\nforall x (Movable(x) and Assignable(x) -> Unrested(x))\n\nnot Principal(briana)\n\nnot Principal(briana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2012"} {"premises": "Dyan is ancillary. Dyan is cubical. Dyan is pitiful. Dyan is derivable. Dyan is consummate. Dyan is imperative. Mahalia is ancillary. Mahalia is pitiful. Mahalia is feverous. Mahalia is consummate. Lonny is ancillary. Lonny is pitiful. Lonny is feverous. Lonny is consummate. Lonny is imperative. Round things are imperative. All derivable things are ancillary. If something is consummate then it is derivable. Round things are consummate. All ancillary things are consummate. All consummate, cubical things are pitiful. Lonny is cubical.", "logic": "\nAncillary(dyan)\nCubical(dyan)\nPitiful(dyan)\nDerivable(dyan)\nConsummate(dyan)\nImperative(dyan)\nAncillary(mahalia)\nPitiful(mahalia)\nFeverous(mahalia)\nConsummate(mahalia)\nAncillary(lonny)\nPitiful(lonny)\nFeverous(lonny)\nConsummate(lonny)\nImperative(lonny)\nforall x (Feverous(x) -> Imperative(x))\nforall x (Derivable(x) -> Ancillary(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) -> Derivable(x))\nforall x (Feverous(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Ancillary(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) and Cubical(x) -> Pitiful(x))\n\nCubical(lonny)\n\nCubical(lonny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2012"} {"premises": "Sampson is calcaneal. Sampson is unfrozen. Sampson is crank. Sallie is isothermal. Sallie is unfrozen. Sallie is crank. Talia is isothermal. Talia is calcaneal. Talia is unfrozen. Talia is rabbinical. Talia is crank. Sandra is fucking. Sandra is calcaneal. Sandra is unfrozen. Sandra is crank. If someone is isothermal and calcaneal then they are faucal. If someone is faucal then they are rabbinical. Green, unfrozen people are crank. If someone is calcaneal and rabbinical then they are isothermal. Rough people are fucking. If someone is fucking then they are calcaneal. Sandra is crank.", "logic": "\nCalcaneal(sampson)\nUnfrozen(sampson)\nCrank(sampson)\nIsothermal(sallie)\nUnfrozen(sallie)\nCrank(sallie)\nIsothermal(talia)\nCalcaneal(talia)\nUnfrozen(talia)\nRabbinical(talia)\nCrank(talia)\nFucking(sandra)\nCalcaneal(sandra)\nUnfrozen(sandra)\nCrank(sandra)\nforall x (Isothermal(x) and Calcaneal(x) -> Faucal(x))\nforall x (Faucal(x) -> Rabbinical(x))\nforall x (Isothermal(x) and Unfrozen(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Calcaneal(x) and Rabbinical(x) -> Isothermal(x))\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Fucking(x))\nforall x (Fucking(x) -> Calcaneal(x))\n\nCrank(sandra)\n\ntherefore Crank(sandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Joceline is blockish. Joceline is muddied. Joceline is secretive. Shepherd is mass. Shepherd is muddied. Shepherd is secretive. Jade is mass. Jade is blockish. Jade is muddied. Jade is quadratic. Jade is secretive. Anselm is roiling. Anselm is blockish. Anselm is muddied. Anselm is secretive. If someone is mass and blockish then they are synchronal. If someone is synchronal then they are quadratic. Green, muddied people are secretive. If someone is blockish and quadratic then they are mass. Rough people are roiling. If someone is roiling then they are blockish. Jade is not secretive.", "logic": "\nBlockish(joceline)\nMuddied(joceline)\nSecretive(joceline)\nMass(shepherd)\nMuddied(shepherd)\nSecretive(shepherd)\nMass(jade)\nBlockish(jade)\nMuddied(jade)\nQuadratic(jade)\nSecretive(jade)\nRoiling(anselm)\nBlockish(anselm)\nMuddied(anselm)\nSecretive(anselm)\nforall x (Mass(x) and Blockish(x) -> Synchronal(x))\nforall x (Synchronal(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nforall x (Mass(x) and Muddied(x) -> Secretive(x))\nforall x (Blockish(x) and Quadratic(x) -> Mass(x))\nforall x (Muddied(x) -> Roiling(x))\nforall x (Roiling(x) -> Blockish(x))\n\nnot Secretive(jade)\n\ntherefore Secretive(jade)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Jehanna is mercerized. Jehanna is vesicant. Jehanna is enured. Evey is bighearted. Evey is vesicant. Evey is enured. Vitia is bighearted. Vitia is mercerized. Vitia is vesicant. Vitia is visualized. Vitia is enured. Frankie is spouting. Frankie is mercerized. Frankie is vesicant. Frankie is enured. If someone is bighearted and mercerized then they are subjacent. If someone is subjacent then they are visualized. Green, vesicant people are enured. If someone is mercerized and visualized then they are bighearted. Rough people are spouting. If someone is spouting then they are mercerized. Vitia is spouting.", "logic": "\nMercerized(jehanna)\nVesicant(jehanna)\nEnured(jehanna)\nBighearted(evey)\nVesicant(evey)\nEnured(evey)\nBighearted(vitia)\nMercerized(vitia)\nVesicant(vitia)\nVisualized(vitia)\nEnured(vitia)\nSpouting(frankie)\nMercerized(frankie)\nVesicant(frankie)\nEnured(frankie)\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Mercerized(x) -> Subjacent(x))\nforall x (Subjacent(x) -> Visualized(x))\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Vesicant(x) -> Enured(x))\nforall x (Mercerized(x) and Visualized(x) -> Bighearted(x))\nforall x (Vesicant(x) -> Spouting(x))\nforall x (Spouting(x) -> Mercerized(x))\n\nSpouting(vitia)\n\nVesicant(vitia) and forall x (Vesicant(x) -> Spouting(x)) -> therefore Spouting(vitia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Jillian is atypical. Jillian is wriggling. Jillian is unredeemed. Everard is just. Everard is wriggling. Everard is unredeemed. Nessi is just. Nessi is atypical. Nessi is wriggling. Nessi is divisive. Nessi is unredeemed. Ishmael is hooked. Ishmael is atypical. Ishmael is wriggling. Ishmael is unredeemed. If someone is just and atypical then they are standing. If someone is standing then they are divisive. Green, wriggling people are unredeemed. If someone is atypical and divisive then they are just. Rough people are hooked. If someone is hooked then they are atypical. Jillian is not hooked.", "logic": "\nAtypical(jillian)\nWriggling(jillian)\nUnredeemed(jillian)\nJust(everard)\nWriggling(everard)\nUnredeemed(everard)\nJust(nessi)\nAtypical(nessi)\nWriggling(nessi)\nDivisive(nessi)\nUnredeemed(nessi)\nHooked(ishmael)\nAtypical(ishmael)\nWriggling(ishmael)\nUnredeemed(ishmael)\nforall x (Just(x) and Atypical(x) -> Standing(x))\nforall x (Standing(x) -> Divisive(x))\nforall x (Just(x) and Wriggling(x) -> Unredeemed(x))\nforall x (Atypical(x) and Divisive(x) -> Just(x))\nforall x (Wriggling(x) -> Hooked(x))\nforall x (Hooked(x) -> Atypical(x))\n\nnot Hooked(jillian)\n\nWriggling(jillian) and forall x (Wriggling(x) -> Hooked(x)) -> therefore Hooked(jillian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Shaylyn is pulseless. Shaylyn is rounded. Shaylyn is supervised. Andre is plaintive. Andre is rounded. Andre is supervised. Verney is plaintive. Verney is pulseless. Verney is rounded. Verney is unuseable. Verney is supervised. Thea is unexcused. Thea is pulseless. Thea is rounded. Thea is supervised. If someone is plaintive and pulseless then they are occlusive. If someone is occlusive then they are unuseable. Green, rounded people are supervised. If someone is pulseless and unuseable then they are plaintive. Rough people are unexcused. If someone is unexcused then they are pulseless. Andre is pulseless.", "logic": "\nPulseless(shaylyn)\nRounded(shaylyn)\nSupervised(shaylyn)\nPlaintive(andre)\nRounded(andre)\nSupervised(andre)\nPlaintive(verney)\nPulseless(verney)\nRounded(verney)\nUnuseable(verney)\nSupervised(verney)\nUnexcused(thea)\nPulseless(thea)\nRounded(thea)\nSupervised(thea)\nforall x (Plaintive(x) and Pulseless(x) -> Occlusive(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) -> Unuseable(x))\nforall x (Plaintive(x) and Rounded(x) -> Supervised(x))\nforall x (Pulseless(x) and Unuseable(x) -> Plaintive(x))\nforall x (Rounded(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Unexcused(x) -> Pulseless(x))\n\nPulseless(andre)\n\nRounded(andre) and forall x (Rounded(x) -> Unexcused(x)) -> therefore Unexcused(andre) Unexcused(andre) and forall x (Unexcused(x) -> Pulseless(x)) -> therefore Pulseless(andre)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Maude is rabid. Maude is tidy. Maude is seasonal. Kimberlyn is cultivated. Kimberlyn is tidy. Kimberlyn is seasonal. Alic is cultivated. Alic is rabid. Alic is tidy. Alic is atrophied. Alic is seasonal. Karol is microsomal. Karol is rabid. Karol is tidy. Karol is seasonal. If someone is cultivated and rabid then they are orthodox. If someone is orthodox then they are atrophied. Green, tidy people are seasonal. If someone is rabid and atrophied then they are cultivated. Rough people are microsomal. If someone is microsomal then they are rabid. Kimberlyn is not rabid.", "logic": "\nRabid(maude)\nTidy(maude)\nSeasonal(maude)\nCultivated(kimberlyn)\nTidy(kimberlyn)\nSeasonal(kimberlyn)\nCultivated(alic)\nRabid(alic)\nTidy(alic)\nAtrophied(alic)\nSeasonal(alic)\nMicrosomal(karol)\nRabid(karol)\nTidy(karol)\nSeasonal(karol)\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and Rabid(x) -> Orthodox(x))\nforall x (Orthodox(x) -> Atrophied(x))\nforall x (Cultivated(x) and Tidy(x) -> Seasonal(x))\nforall x (Rabid(x) and Atrophied(x) -> Cultivated(x))\nforall x (Tidy(x) -> Microsomal(x))\nforall x (Microsomal(x) -> Rabid(x))\n\nnot Rabid(kimberlyn)\n\nTidy(kimberlyn) and forall x (Tidy(x) -> Microsomal(x)) -> therefore Microsomal(kimberlyn) Microsomal(kimberlyn) and forall x (Microsomal(x) -> Rabid(x)) -> therefore Rabid(kimberlyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Paulita is struck. Paulita is megascopic. Paulita is foxy. Courtney is vaccinated. Courtney is megascopic. Courtney is foxy. Rebeca is vaccinated. Rebeca is struck. Rebeca is megascopic. Rebeca is atonal. Rebeca is foxy. Rosaline is virtual. Rosaline is struck. Rosaline is megascopic. Rosaline is foxy. If someone is vaccinated and struck then they are gelded. If someone is gelded then they are atonal. Green, megascopic people are foxy. If someone is struck and atonal then they are vaccinated. Rough people are virtual. If someone is virtual then they are struck. Courtney is gelded.", "logic": "\nStruck(paulita)\nMegascopic(paulita)\nFoxy(paulita)\nVaccinated(courtney)\nMegascopic(courtney)\nFoxy(courtney)\nVaccinated(rebeca)\nStruck(rebeca)\nMegascopic(rebeca)\nAtonal(rebeca)\nFoxy(rebeca)\nVirtual(rosaline)\nStruck(rosaline)\nMegascopic(rosaline)\nFoxy(rosaline)\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Struck(x) -> Gelded(x))\nforall x (Gelded(x) -> Atonal(x))\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) and Megascopic(x) -> Foxy(x))\nforall x (Struck(x) and Atonal(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\nforall x (Megascopic(x) -> Virtual(x))\nforall x (Virtual(x) -> Struck(x))\n\nGelded(courtney)\n\nMegascopic(courtney) and forall x (Megascopic(x) -> Virtual(x)) -> therefore Virtual(courtney) Virtual(courtney) and forall x (Virtual(x) -> Struck(x)) -> therefore Struck(courtney) Vaccinated(courtney) and Struck(courtney) and forall x (Vaccinated(x) and Struck(x) -> Gelded(x)) -> therefore Gelded(courtney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Aharon is friendless. Aharon is obstinate. Aharon is chubby. Nicholas is volar. Nicholas is obstinate. Nicholas is chubby. Beilul is volar. Beilul is friendless. Beilul is obstinate. Beilul is scenic. Beilul is chubby. Gabrielle is auxiliary. Gabrielle is friendless. Gabrielle is obstinate. Gabrielle is chubby. If someone is volar and friendless then they are battleful. If someone is battleful then they are scenic. Green, obstinate people are chubby. If someone is friendless and scenic then they are volar. Rough people are auxiliary. If someone is auxiliary then they are friendless. Nicholas is not battleful.", "logic": "\nFriendless(aharon)\nObstinate(aharon)\nChubby(aharon)\nVolar(nicholas)\nObstinate(nicholas)\nChubby(nicholas)\nVolar(beilul)\nFriendless(beilul)\nObstinate(beilul)\nScenic(beilul)\nChubby(beilul)\nAuxiliary(gabrielle)\nFriendless(gabrielle)\nObstinate(gabrielle)\nChubby(gabrielle)\nforall x (Volar(x) and Friendless(x) -> Battleful(x))\nforall x (Battleful(x) -> Scenic(x))\nforall x (Volar(x) and Obstinate(x) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Friendless(x) and Scenic(x) -> Volar(x))\nforall x (Obstinate(x) -> Auxiliary(x))\nforall x (Auxiliary(x) -> Friendless(x))\n\nnot Battleful(nicholas)\n\nObstinate(nicholas) and forall x (Obstinate(x) -> Auxiliary(x)) -> therefore Auxiliary(nicholas) Auxiliary(nicholas) and forall x (Auxiliary(x) -> Friendless(x)) -> therefore Friendless(nicholas) Volar(nicholas) and Friendless(nicholas) and forall x (Volar(x) and Friendless(x) -> Battleful(x)) -> therefore Battleful(nicholas)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Zsazsa is seaward. Zsazsa is aortal. Zsazsa is unposed. Connor is limber. Connor is aortal. Connor is unposed. Alaine is limber. Alaine is seaward. Alaine is aortal. Alaine is worth. Alaine is unposed. Sidoney is sanative. Sidoney is seaward. Sidoney is aortal. Sidoney is unposed. If someone is limber and seaward then they are wakeful. If someone is wakeful then they are worth. Green, aortal people are unposed. If someone is seaward and worth then they are limber. Rough people are sanative. If someone is sanative then they are seaward. Sidoney is not worth.", "logic": "\nSeaward(zsazsa)\nAortal(zsazsa)\nUnposed(zsazsa)\nLimber(connor)\nAortal(connor)\nUnposed(connor)\nLimber(alaine)\nSeaward(alaine)\nAortal(alaine)\nWorth(alaine)\nUnposed(alaine)\nSanative(sidoney)\nSeaward(sidoney)\nAortal(sidoney)\nUnposed(sidoney)\nforall x (Limber(x) and Seaward(x) -> Wakeful(x))\nforall x (Wakeful(x) -> Worth(x))\nforall x (Limber(x) and Aortal(x) -> Unposed(x))\nforall x (Seaward(x) and Worth(x) -> Limber(x))\nforall x (Aortal(x) -> Sanative(x))\nforall x (Sanative(x) -> Seaward(x))\n\nnot Worth(sidoney)\n\nforall x (Wakeful(x) -> Worth(x)) <- forall x (Limber(x) and Seaward(x) -> Wakeful(x)) <- forall x (Seaward(x) and Worth(x) -> Limber(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Pennie is inside. Pennie is diseased. Pennie is mutant. Sybilla is cyprinoid. Sybilla is diseased. Sybilla is mutant. Leilah is cyprinoid. Leilah is inside. Leilah is diseased. Leilah is penetrable. Leilah is mutant. Kelcy is talky. Kelcy is inside. Kelcy is diseased. Kelcy is mutant. If someone is cyprinoid and inside then they are ungoverned. If someone is ungoverned then they are penetrable. Green, diseased people are mutant. If someone is inside and penetrable then they are cyprinoid. Rough people are talky. If someone is talky then they are inside. Kelcy is cyprinoid.", "logic": "\nInside(pennie)\nDiseased(pennie)\nMutant(pennie)\nCyprinoid(sybilla)\nDiseased(sybilla)\nMutant(sybilla)\nCyprinoid(leilah)\nInside(leilah)\nDiseased(leilah)\nPenetrable(leilah)\nMutant(leilah)\nTalky(kelcy)\nInside(kelcy)\nDiseased(kelcy)\nMutant(kelcy)\nforall x (Cyprinoid(x) and Inside(x) -> Ungoverned(x))\nforall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Penetrable(x))\nforall x (Cyprinoid(x) and Diseased(x) -> Mutant(x))\nforall x (Inside(x) and Penetrable(x) -> Cyprinoid(x))\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> Talky(x))\nforall x (Talky(x) -> Inside(x))\n\nCyprinoid(kelcy)\n\nforall x (Inside(x) and Penetrable(x) -> Cyprinoid(x)) <- forall x (Ungoverned(x) -> Penetrable(x)) <- forall x (Cyprinoid(x) and Inside(x) -> Ungoverned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Vijay is damask. Vijay is trigonal. Vijay is alsatian. Eloisa is mycenaean. Eloisa is trigonal. Eloisa is alsatian. Gunther is mycenaean. Gunther is damask. Gunther is trigonal. Gunther is assentient. Gunther is alsatian. Sheeree is customary. Sheeree is damask. Sheeree is trigonal. Sheeree is alsatian. If someone is mycenaean and damask then they are unsinkable. If someone is unsinkable then they are assentient. Green, trigonal people are alsatian. If someone is damask and assentient then they are mycenaean. Rough people are customary. If someone is customary then they are damask. Vijay is not mycenaean.", "logic": "\nDamask(vijay)\nTrigonal(vijay)\nAlsatian(vijay)\nMycenaean(eloisa)\nTrigonal(eloisa)\nAlsatian(eloisa)\nMycenaean(gunther)\nDamask(gunther)\nTrigonal(gunther)\nAssentient(gunther)\nAlsatian(gunther)\nCustomary(sheeree)\nDamask(sheeree)\nTrigonal(sheeree)\nAlsatian(sheeree)\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Damask(x) -> Unsinkable(x))\nforall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Assentient(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Trigonal(x) -> Alsatian(x))\nforall x (Damask(x) and Assentient(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> Customary(x))\nforall x (Customary(x) -> Damask(x))\n\nnot Mycenaean(vijay)\n\nforall x (Damask(x) and Assentient(x) -> Mycenaean(x)) <- forall x (Unsinkable(x) -> Assentient(x)) <- forall x (Mycenaean(x) and Damask(x) -> Unsinkable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Bartel is unsold. Bartel is scandalous. Bartel is paunchy. Ricky is abiding. Ricky is scandalous. Ricky is paunchy. Sydel is abiding. Sydel is unsold. Sydel is scandalous. Sydel is unironed. Sydel is paunchy. Lian is insolent. Lian is unsold. Lian is scandalous. Lian is paunchy. If someone is abiding and unsold then they are lustrous. If someone is lustrous then they are unironed. Green, scandalous people are paunchy. If someone is unsold and unironed then they are abiding. Rough people are insolent. If someone is insolent then they are unsold. Bartel is unironed.", "logic": "\nUnsold(bartel)\nScandalous(bartel)\nPaunchy(bartel)\nAbiding(ricky)\nScandalous(ricky)\nPaunchy(ricky)\nAbiding(sydel)\nUnsold(sydel)\nScandalous(sydel)\nUnironed(sydel)\nPaunchy(sydel)\nInsolent(lian)\nUnsold(lian)\nScandalous(lian)\nPaunchy(lian)\nforall x (Abiding(x) and Unsold(x) -> Lustrous(x))\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Unironed(x))\nforall x (Abiding(x) and Scandalous(x) -> Paunchy(x))\nforall x (Unsold(x) and Unironed(x) -> Abiding(x))\nforall x (Scandalous(x) -> Insolent(x))\nforall x (Insolent(x) -> Unsold(x))\n\nUnironed(bartel)\n\nforall x (Lustrous(x) -> Unironed(x)) <- forall x (Abiding(x) and Unsold(x) -> Lustrous(x)) <- forall x (Unsold(x) and Unironed(x) -> Abiding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1260"} {"premises": "Rich is painful. Rich is winded. Rich is astounded. Rich is zymoid. Rich is knockout. Rich is mismated. Rich is ukrainian. Rochester is winded. Rochester is zymoid. Rochester is knockout. Rochester is ukrainian. Fernande is painful. Fernande is winded. Fernande is not astounded. Fernande is mismated. Fernande is ukrainian. White, knockout people are painful. If someone is winded and not astounded then they are painful. If Fernande is painful and Fernande is not astounded then Fernande is zymoid. Rochester is knockout.", "logic": "\nPainful(rich)\nWinded(rich)\nAstounded(rich)\nZymoid(rich)\nKnockout(rich)\nMismated(rich)\nUkrainian(rich)\nWinded(rochester)\nZymoid(rochester)\nKnockout(rochester)\nUkrainian(rochester)\nPainful(fernande)\nWinded(fernande)\nnot Astounded(fernande)\nMismated(fernande)\nUkrainian(fernande)\nforall x (Mismated(x) and Knockout(x) -> Painful(x))\nforall x (Winded(x) and not Astounded(x) -> Painful(x))\nPainful(fernande) and not Astounded(fernande) -> Zymoid(fernande)\n\nKnockout(rochester)\n\ntherefore Knockout(rochester)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5616"} {"premises": "Jessalin is erratic. Jessalin is endogamous. Jessalin is unavowed. Jessalin is aphyllous. Jessalin is lapsed. Jessalin is webby. Jessalin is engorged. Karie is endogamous. Karie is aphyllous. Karie is lapsed. Karie is engorged. Philipa is erratic. Philipa is endogamous. Philipa is not unavowed. Philipa is webby. Philipa is engorged. White, lapsed people are erratic. If someone is endogamous and not unavowed then they are erratic. If Philipa is erratic and Philipa is not unavowed then Philipa is aphyllous. Philipa is not endogamous.", "logic": "\nErratic(jessalin)\nEndogamous(jessalin)\nUnavowed(jessalin)\nAphyllous(jessalin)\nLapsed(jessalin)\nWebby(jessalin)\nEngorged(jessalin)\nEndogamous(karie)\nAphyllous(karie)\nLapsed(karie)\nEngorged(karie)\nErratic(philipa)\nEndogamous(philipa)\nnot Unavowed(philipa)\nWebby(philipa)\nEngorged(philipa)\nforall x (Webby(x) and Lapsed(x) -> Erratic(x))\nforall x (Endogamous(x) and not Unavowed(x) -> Erratic(x))\nErratic(philipa) and not Unavowed(philipa) -> Aphyllous(philipa)\n\nnot Endogamous(philipa)\n\ntherefore Endogamous(philipa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5616"} {"premises": "Idalina is telepathic. Idalina is baptised. Idalina is mansard. Idalina is tiddly. Idalina is combinable. Idalina is uncured. Idalina is shaved. Ronica is baptised. Ronica is tiddly. Ronica is combinable. Ronica is shaved. Dorrie is telepathic. Dorrie is baptised. Dorrie is not mansard. Dorrie is uncured. Dorrie is shaved. White, combinable people are telepathic. If someone is baptised and not mansard then they are telepathic. If Dorrie is telepathic and Dorrie is not mansard then Dorrie is tiddly. Ronica is not telepathic.", "logic": "\nTelepathic(idalina)\nBaptised(idalina)\nMansard(idalina)\nTiddly(idalina)\nCombinable(idalina)\nUncured(idalina)\nShaved(idalina)\nBaptised(ronica)\nTiddly(ronica)\nCombinable(ronica)\nShaved(ronica)\nTelepathic(dorrie)\nBaptised(dorrie)\nnot Mansard(dorrie)\nUncured(dorrie)\nShaved(dorrie)\nforall x (Uncured(x) and Combinable(x) -> Telepathic(x))\nforall x (Baptised(x) and not Mansard(x) -> Telepathic(x))\nTelepathic(dorrie) and not Mansard(dorrie) -> Tiddly(dorrie)\n\nnot Telepathic(ronica)\n\nforall x (Uncured(x) and Combinable(x) -> Telepathic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5616"} {"premises": "Anabelle is hydrated. Anabelle is moody. Anabelle is offside. Anabelle is choleric. Anabelle is hasidic. Anabelle is hemal. Anabelle is niggardly. Elke is moody. Elke is choleric. Elke is hasidic. Elke is niggardly. Lemuel is hydrated. Lemuel is moody. Lemuel is not offside. Lemuel is hemal. Lemuel is niggardly. White, hasidic people are hydrated. If someone is moody and not offside then they are hydrated. If Lemuel is hydrated and Lemuel is not offside then Lemuel is choleric. Elke is offside.", "logic": "\nHydrated(anabelle)\nMoody(anabelle)\nOffside(anabelle)\nCholeric(anabelle)\nHasidic(anabelle)\nHemal(anabelle)\nNiggardly(anabelle)\nMoody(elke)\nCholeric(elke)\nHasidic(elke)\nNiggardly(elke)\nHydrated(lemuel)\nMoody(lemuel)\nnot Offside(lemuel)\nHemal(lemuel)\nNiggardly(lemuel)\nforall x (Hemal(x) and Hasidic(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Moody(x) and not Offside(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nHydrated(lemuel) and not Offside(lemuel) -> Choleric(lemuel)\n\nOffside(elke)\n\nOffside(elke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5616"} {"premises": "Alvin is serrate. Anita is funky. Anita is cheliceral. All washed people are funky. If someone is ethnic then they are cheliceral. Alvin is serrate.", "logic": "\nSerrate(alvin)\nFunky(anita)\nCheliceral(anita)\nforall x (Washed(x) -> Funky(x))\nforall x (Ethnic(x) -> Cheliceral(x))\n\nSerrate(alvin)\n\ntherefore Serrate(alvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "Priscilla is voiceless. Newton is pregnant. Newton is visceral. All verbalised people are pregnant. If someone is subnormal then they are visceral. Newton is not visceral.", "logic": "\nVoiceless(priscilla)\nPregnant(newton)\nVisceral(newton)\nforall x (Verbalised(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Subnormal(x) -> Visceral(x))\n\nnot Visceral(newton)\n\ntherefore Visceral(newton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "Krystal is laboring. Neely is stooping. Neely is scorched. All unpackaged people are stooping. If someone is eruptive then they are scorched. Krystal is not stooping.", "logic": "\nLaboring(krystal)\nStooping(neely)\nScorched(neely)\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Stooping(x))\nforall x (Eruptive(x) -> Scorched(x))\n\nnot Stooping(krystal)\n\nforall x (Unpackaged(x) -> Stooping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "Parke is savory. Murray is palpitant. Murray is neuralgic. All spurned people are palpitant. If someone is topknotted then they are neuralgic. Parke is topknotted.", "logic": "\nSavory(parke)\nPalpitant(murray)\nNeuralgic(murray)\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Palpitant(x))\nforall x (Topknotted(x) -> Neuralgic(x))\n\nTopknotted(parke)\n\nTopknotted(parke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6005"} {"premises": "Prentiss is calycular. Birdie is calycular. Birdie is physical. Birdie is perishable. Sasha is calycular. Sasha is physical. Rabbi is physical. All emollient, calycular people are mauve. All perishable people are physical. All marooned, emollient people are calycular. All calycular, numbing people are emollient. All mauve, calycular people are marooned. All physical people are emollient. Rabbi is physical.", "logic": "\nCalycular(prentiss)\nCalycular(birdie)\nPhysical(birdie)\nPerishable(birdie)\nCalycular(sasha)\nPhysical(sasha)\nPhysical(rabbi)\nforall x (Emollient(x) and Calycular(x) -> Mauve(x))\nforall x (Perishable(x) -> Physical(x))\nforall x (Marooned(x) and Emollient(x) -> Calycular(x))\nforall x (Calycular(x) and Numbing(x) -> Emollient(x))\nforall x (Mauve(x) and Calycular(x) -> Marooned(x))\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Emollient(x))\n\nPhysical(rabbi)\n\ntherefore Physical(rabbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Janessa is straw. Erma is straw. Erma is dextrorsal. Erma is telltale. Laurette is straw. Laurette is dextrorsal. Dayna is dextrorsal. All wrong, straw people are emaciated. All telltale people are dextrorsal. All astragalar, wrong people are straw. All straw, revengeful people are wrong. All emaciated, straw people are astragalar. All dextrorsal people are wrong. Erma is not straw.", "logic": "\nStraw(janessa)\nStraw(erma)\nDextrorsal(erma)\nTelltale(erma)\nStraw(laurette)\nDextrorsal(laurette)\nDextrorsal(dayna)\nforall x (Wrong(x) and Straw(x) -> Emaciated(x))\nforall x (Telltale(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\nforall x (Astragalar(x) and Wrong(x) -> Straw(x))\nforall x (Straw(x) and Revengeful(x) -> Wrong(x))\nforall x (Emaciated(x) and Straw(x) -> Astragalar(x))\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) -> Wrong(x))\n\nnot Straw(erma)\n\ntherefore Straw(erma)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Kevin is unmarried. Stephanie is unmarried. Stephanie is trendy. Stephanie is caucasian. Dotti is unmarried. Dotti is trendy. Julina is trendy. All unused, unmarried people are delicate. All caucasian people are trendy. All monegasque, unused people are unmarried. All unmarried, unclogged people are unused. All delicate, unmarried people are monegasque. All trendy people are unused. Stephanie is unused.", "logic": "\nUnmarried(kevin)\nUnmarried(stephanie)\nTrendy(stephanie)\nCaucasian(stephanie)\nUnmarried(dotti)\nTrendy(dotti)\nTrendy(julina)\nforall x (Unused(x) and Unmarried(x) -> Delicate(x))\nforall x (Caucasian(x) -> Trendy(x))\nforall x (Monegasque(x) and Unused(x) -> Unmarried(x))\nforall x (Unmarried(x) and Unclogged(x) -> Unused(x))\nforall x (Delicate(x) and Unmarried(x) -> Monegasque(x))\nforall x (Trendy(x) -> Unused(x))\n\nUnused(stephanie)\n\nTrendy(stephanie) and forall x (Trendy(x) -> Unused(x)) -> therefore Unused(stephanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Ximenez is flint. Wood is flint. Wood is burled. Wood is rangy. Tulley is flint. Tulley is burled. Phineas is burled. All salubrious, flint people are lubricious. All rangy people are burled. All angular, salubrious people are flint. All flint, unknowable people are salubrious. All lubricious, flint people are angular. All burled people are salubrious. Wood is not salubrious.", "logic": "\nFlint(ximenez)\nFlint(wood)\nBurled(wood)\nRangy(wood)\nFlint(tulley)\nBurled(tulley)\nBurled(phineas)\nforall x (Salubrious(x) and Flint(x) -> Lubricious(x))\nforall x (Rangy(x) -> Burled(x))\nforall x (Angular(x) and Salubrious(x) -> Flint(x))\nforall x (Flint(x) and Unknowable(x) -> Salubrious(x))\nforall x (Lubricious(x) and Flint(x) -> Angular(x))\nforall x (Burled(x) -> Salubrious(x))\n\nnot Salubrious(wood)\n\nBurled(wood) and forall x (Burled(x) -> Salubrious(x)) -> therefore Salubrious(wood)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Elayne is farsighted. Gwendolin is farsighted. Gwendolin is lacerated. Gwendolin is saccharine. Alisun is farsighted. Alisun is lacerated. Merline is lacerated. All semisolid, farsighted people are disarming. All saccharine people are lacerated. All placid, semisolid people are farsighted. All farsighted, unfilled people are semisolid. All disarming, farsighted people are placid. All lacerated people are semisolid. Alisun is disarming.", "logic": "\nFarsighted(elayne)\nFarsighted(gwendolin)\nLacerated(gwendolin)\nSaccharine(gwendolin)\nFarsighted(alisun)\nLacerated(alisun)\nLacerated(merline)\nforall x (Semisolid(x) and Farsighted(x) -> Disarming(x))\nforall x (Saccharine(x) -> Lacerated(x))\nforall x (Placid(x) and Semisolid(x) -> Farsighted(x))\nforall x (Farsighted(x) and Unfilled(x) -> Semisolid(x))\nforall x (Disarming(x) and Farsighted(x) -> Placid(x))\nforall x (Lacerated(x) -> Semisolid(x))\n\nDisarming(alisun)\n\nLacerated(alisun) and forall x (Lacerated(x) -> Semisolid(x)) -> therefore Semisolid(alisun) Semisolid(alisun) and Farsighted(alisun) and forall x (Semisolid(x) and Farsighted(x) -> Disarming(x)) -> therefore Disarming(alisun)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Pembroke is skilled. Meggi is skilled. Meggi is surficial. Meggi is rhymeless. Gigi is skilled. Gigi is surficial. Leeanne is surficial. All coequal, skilled people are dusky. All rhymeless people are surficial. All asyndetic, coequal people are skilled. All skilled, hulky people are coequal. All dusky, skilled people are asyndetic. All surficial people are coequal. Meggi is not dusky.", "logic": "\nSkilled(pembroke)\nSkilled(meggi)\nSurficial(meggi)\nRhymeless(meggi)\nSkilled(gigi)\nSurficial(gigi)\nSurficial(leeanne)\nforall x (Coequal(x) and Skilled(x) -> Dusky(x))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) -> Surficial(x))\nforall x (Asyndetic(x) and Coequal(x) -> Skilled(x))\nforall x (Skilled(x) and Hulky(x) -> Coequal(x))\nforall x (Dusky(x) and Skilled(x) -> Asyndetic(x))\nforall x (Surficial(x) -> Coequal(x))\n\nnot Dusky(meggi)\n\nSurficial(meggi) and forall x (Surficial(x) -> Coequal(x)) -> therefore Coequal(meggi) Coequal(meggi) and Skilled(meggi) and forall x (Coequal(x) and Skilled(x) -> Dusky(x)) -> therefore Dusky(meggi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Cordelie is imbricated. Suzie is imbricated. Suzie is hermitic. Suzie is lifelike. Roderigo is imbricated. Roderigo is hermitic. Sidoney is hermitic. All scaphoid, imbricated people are forehanded. All lifelike people are hermitic. All punitory, scaphoid people are imbricated. All imbricated, outlying people are scaphoid. All forehanded, imbricated people are punitory. All hermitic people are scaphoid. Suzie is punitory.", "logic": "\nImbricated(cordelie)\nImbricated(suzie)\nHermitic(suzie)\nLifelike(suzie)\nImbricated(roderigo)\nHermitic(roderigo)\nHermitic(sidoney)\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) and Imbricated(x) -> Forehanded(x))\nforall x (Lifelike(x) -> Hermitic(x))\nforall x (Punitory(x) and Scaphoid(x) -> Imbricated(x))\nforall x (Imbricated(x) and Outlying(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\nforall x (Forehanded(x) and Imbricated(x) -> Punitory(x))\nforall x (Hermitic(x) -> Scaphoid(x))\n\nPunitory(suzie)\n\nHermitic(suzie) and forall x (Hermitic(x) -> Scaphoid(x)) -> therefore Scaphoid(suzie) Scaphoid(suzie) and Imbricated(suzie) and forall x (Scaphoid(x) and Imbricated(x) -> Forehanded(x)) -> therefore Forehanded(suzie) Forehanded(suzie) and Imbricated(suzie) and forall x (Forehanded(x) and Imbricated(x) -> Punitory(x)) -> therefore Punitory(suzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Susy is humbling. Sybilla is humbling. Sybilla is copasetic. Sybilla is inducive. Laurence is humbling. Laurence is copasetic. Casi is copasetic. All scatty, humbling people are optic. All inducive people are copasetic. All parvenu, scatty people are humbling. All humbling, fiendish people are scatty. All optic, humbling people are parvenu. All copasetic people are scatty. Laurence is not parvenu.", "logic": "\nHumbling(susy)\nHumbling(sybilla)\nCopasetic(sybilla)\nInducive(sybilla)\nHumbling(laurence)\nCopasetic(laurence)\nCopasetic(casi)\nforall x (Scatty(x) and Humbling(x) -> Optic(x))\nforall x (Inducive(x) -> Copasetic(x))\nforall x (Parvenu(x) and Scatty(x) -> Humbling(x))\nforall x (Humbling(x) and Fiendish(x) -> Scatty(x))\nforall x (Optic(x) and Humbling(x) -> Parvenu(x))\nforall x (Copasetic(x) -> Scatty(x))\n\nnot Parvenu(laurence)\n\nCopasetic(laurence) and forall x (Copasetic(x) -> Scatty(x)) -> therefore Scatty(laurence) Scatty(laurence) and Humbling(laurence) and forall x (Scatty(x) and Humbling(x) -> Optic(x)) -> therefore Optic(laurence) Optic(laurence) and Humbling(laurence) and forall x (Optic(x) and Humbling(x) -> Parvenu(x)) -> therefore Parvenu(laurence)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Silvester is latino. Chrysler is latino. Chrysler is oozy. Chrysler is worthwhile. Julina is latino. Julina is oozy. Mikel is oozy. All sorted, latino people are true. All worthwhile people are oozy. All unnerved, sorted people are latino. All latino, impeccant people are sorted. All true, latino people are unnerved. All oozy people are sorted. Mikel is not true.", "logic": "\nLatino(silvester)\nLatino(chrysler)\nOozy(chrysler)\nWorthwhile(chrysler)\nLatino(julina)\nOozy(julina)\nOozy(mikel)\nforall x (Sorted(x) and Latino(x) -> True(x))\nforall x (Worthwhile(x) -> Oozy(x))\nforall x (Unnerved(x) and Sorted(x) -> Latino(x))\nforall x (Latino(x) and Impeccant(x) -> Sorted(x))\nforall x (True(x) and Latino(x) -> Unnerved(x))\nforall x (Oozy(x) -> Sorted(x))\n\nnot True(mikel)\n\nforall x (Sorted(x) and Latino(x) -> True(x)) <- forall x (Unnerved(x) and Sorted(x) -> Latino(x)) <- forall x (True(x) and Latino(x) -> Unnerved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Feliza is receivable. Wilow is receivable. Wilow is contrasty. Wilow is balsamic. Kally is receivable. Kally is contrasty. Titos is contrasty. All prolix, receivable people are assessable. All balsamic people are contrasty. All androgenic, prolix people are receivable. All receivable, brisk people are prolix. All assessable, receivable people are androgenic. All contrasty people are prolix. Feliza is androgenic.", "logic": "\nReceivable(feliza)\nReceivable(wilow)\nContrasty(wilow)\nBalsamic(wilow)\nReceivable(kally)\nContrasty(kally)\nContrasty(titos)\nforall x (Prolix(x) and Receivable(x) -> Assessable(x))\nforall x (Balsamic(x) -> Contrasty(x))\nforall x (Androgenic(x) and Prolix(x) -> Receivable(x))\nforall x (Receivable(x) and Brisk(x) -> Prolix(x))\nforall x (Assessable(x) and Receivable(x) -> Androgenic(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Prolix(x))\n\nAndrogenic(feliza)\n\nforall x (Assessable(x) and Receivable(x) -> Androgenic(x)) <- forall x (Prolix(x) and Receivable(x) -> Assessable(x)) <- forall x (Contrasty(x) -> Prolix(x)) <- forall x (Balsamic(x) -> Contrasty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Dorothee is shinto. Harriet is shinto. Harriet is chimerical. Harriet is weblike. Conney is shinto. Conney is chimerical. Bryon is chimerical. All unhallowed, shinto people are embroiled. All weblike people are chimerical. All tipped, unhallowed people are shinto. All shinto, vatic people are unhallowed. All embroiled, shinto people are tipped. All chimerical people are unhallowed. Bryon is not tipped.", "logic": "\nShinto(dorothee)\nShinto(harriet)\nChimerical(harriet)\nWeblike(harriet)\nShinto(conney)\nChimerical(conney)\nChimerical(bryon)\nforall x (Unhallowed(x) and Shinto(x) -> Embroiled(x))\nforall x (Weblike(x) -> Chimerical(x))\nforall x (Tipped(x) and Unhallowed(x) -> Shinto(x))\nforall x (Shinto(x) and Vatic(x) -> Unhallowed(x))\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and Shinto(x) -> Tipped(x))\nforall x (Chimerical(x) -> Unhallowed(x))\n\nnot Tipped(bryon)\n\nforall x (Embroiled(x) and Shinto(x) -> Tipped(x)) <- forall x (Tipped(x) and Unhallowed(x) -> Shinto(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Kirstin is modal. Raleigh is modal. Raleigh is cesarean. Raleigh is adducent. Ewan is modal. Ewan is cesarean. Mattie is cesarean. All scrawny, modal people are squealing. All adducent people are cesarean. All gnarly, scrawny people are modal. All modal, documented people are scrawny. All squealing, modal people are gnarly. All cesarean people are scrawny. Kirstin is cesarean.", "logic": "\nModal(kirstin)\nModal(raleigh)\nCesarean(raleigh)\nAdducent(raleigh)\nModal(ewan)\nCesarean(ewan)\nCesarean(mattie)\nforall x (Scrawny(x) and Modal(x) -> Squealing(x))\nforall x (Adducent(x) -> Cesarean(x))\nforall x (Gnarly(x) and Scrawny(x) -> Modal(x))\nforall x (Modal(x) and Documented(x) -> Scrawny(x))\nforall x (Squealing(x) and Modal(x) -> Gnarly(x))\nforall x (Cesarean(x) -> Scrawny(x))\n\nCesarean(kirstin)\n\nforall x (Adducent(x) -> Cesarean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Brandie is feasible. Shep is feasible. Shep is avocado. Shep is daedal. Malena is feasible. Malena is avocado. Joshuah is avocado. All furious, feasible people are precatory. All daedal people are avocado. All readable, furious people are feasible. All feasible, mean people are furious. All precatory, feasible people are readable. All avocado people are furious. Malena is not daedal.", "logic": "\nFeasible(brandie)\nFeasible(shep)\nAvocado(shep)\nDaedal(shep)\nFeasible(malena)\nAvocado(malena)\nAvocado(joshuah)\nforall x (Furious(x) and Feasible(x) -> Precatory(x))\nforall x (Daedal(x) -> Avocado(x))\nforall x (Readable(x) and Furious(x) -> Feasible(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) and Mean(x) -> Furious(x))\nforall x (Precatory(x) and Feasible(x) -> Readable(x))\nforall x (Avocado(x) -> Furious(x))\n\nnot Daedal(malena)\n\nnot Daedal(malena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Maxim is entozoan. Arlee is entozoan. Arlee is shattering. Arlee is hurtful. Dorena is entozoan. Dorena is shattering. Marysa is shattering. All groomed, entozoan people are frumpy. All hurtful people are shattering. All rotational, groomed people are entozoan. All entozoan, southmost people are groomed. All frumpy, entozoan people are rotational. All shattering people are groomed. Dorena is southmost.", "logic": "\nEntozoan(maxim)\nEntozoan(arlee)\nShattering(arlee)\nHurtful(arlee)\nEntozoan(dorena)\nShattering(dorena)\nShattering(marysa)\nforall x (Groomed(x) and Entozoan(x) -> Frumpy(x))\nforall x (Hurtful(x) -> Shattering(x))\nforall x (Rotational(x) and Groomed(x) -> Entozoan(x))\nforall x (Entozoan(x) and Southmost(x) -> Groomed(x))\nforall x (Frumpy(x) and Entozoan(x) -> Rotational(x))\nforall x (Shattering(x) -> Groomed(x))\n\nSouthmost(dorena)\n\nSouthmost(dorena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Harmon is circinate. Rennie is circinate. Rennie is arty. Rennie is adenoidal. Horst is circinate. Horst is arty. Alasdair is arty. All icteric, circinate people are twoscore. All adenoidal people are arty. All vertebrate, icteric people are circinate. All circinate, dear people are icteric. All twoscore, circinate people are vertebrate. All arty people are icteric. Harmon is not adenoidal.", "logic": "\nCircinate(harmon)\nCircinate(rennie)\nArty(rennie)\nAdenoidal(rennie)\nCircinate(horst)\nArty(horst)\nArty(alasdair)\nforall x (Icteric(x) and Circinate(x) -> Twoscore(x))\nforall x (Adenoidal(x) -> Arty(x))\nforall x (Vertebrate(x) and Icteric(x) -> Circinate(x))\nforall x (Circinate(x) and Dear(x) -> Icteric(x))\nforall x (Twoscore(x) and Circinate(x) -> Vertebrate(x))\nforall x (Arty(x) -> Icteric(x))\n\nnot Adenoidal(harmon)\n\nnot Adenoidal(harmon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Kriste is professed. Matteo is professed. Matteo is lite. Matteo is unawakened. Sloan is professed. Sloan is lite. Phyllis is lite. All henpecked, professed people are bordered. All unawakened people are lite. All perennial, henpecked people are professed. All professed, stomachal people are henpecked. All bordered, professed people are perennial. All lite people are henpecked. Phyllis is stomachal.", "logic": "\nProfessed(kriste)\nProfessed(matteo)\nLite(matteo)\nUnawakened(matteo)\nProfessed(sloan)\nLite(sloan)\nLite(phyllis)\nforall x (Henpecked(x) and Professed(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Unawakened(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Perennial(x) and Henpecked(x) -> Professed(x))\nforall x (Professed(x) and Stomachal(x) -> Henpecked(x))\nforall x (Bordered(x) and Professed(x) -> Perennial(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Henpecked(x))\n\nStomachal(phyllis)\n\nStomachal(phyllis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "The rozella finalize the melina. The melina finalize the rozella. The melina is unprovoked. The melina wholesale the rozella. The rosy is viscous. The rosy plasticize the melina. The rosy wholesale the rozella. If something finalize the melina then the melina does not visit the rosy. If something plasticize the rozella then the rozella is not boneheaded. If the melina wholesale the rosy and the melina is not viscous then the melina finalize the rozella. If something wholesale the rozella then it is boneheaded. If something is boneheaded then it plasticize the rozella. If something is boneheaded then it plasticize the rozella. If something is unprovoked and it does not like the rozella then it finalize the rozella. If something finalize the rozella and it plasticize the rosy then it finalize the rosy. The melina wholesale the rozella.", "logic": "\nFinalize(rozella, melina)\nFinalize(melina, rozella)\nUnprovoked(melina)\nWholesale(melina, rozella)\nViscous(rosy)\nPlasticize(rosy, melina)\nWholesale(rosy, rozella)\nforall x (Finalize(x, melina) -> not Wholesale(melina, rosy))\nforall x (Plasticize(x, rozella) -> not Boneheaded(rozella))\nWholesale(melina, rosy) and not Viscous(melina) -> Finalize(melina, rozella)\nforall x (Wholesale(x, rozella) -> Boneheaded(x))\nforall x (Boneheaded(x) -> Plasticize(x, rozella))\nforall x (Boneheaded(x) -> Plasticize(x, rozella))\nforall x (Unprovoked(x) and not Plasticize(x, rozella) -> Finalize(x, rozella))\nforall x (Finalize(x, rozella) and Plasticize(x, rosy) -> Finalize(x, rosy))\n\nWholesale(melina, rozella)\n\ntherefore Wholesale(melina, rozella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The sophronia scavenge the zolly. The zolly scavenge the sophronia. The zolly is upcoming. The zolly stem the sophronia. The genovera is rapacious. The genovera motley the zolly. The genovera stem the sophronia. If something scavenge the zolly then the zolly does not visit the genovera. If something motley the sophronia then the sophronia is not mimetic. If the zolly stem the genovera and the zolly is not rapacious then the zolly scavenge the sophronia. If something stem the sophronia then it is mimetic. If something is mimetic then it motley the sophronia. If something is mimetic then it motley the sophronia. If something is upcoming and it does not like the sophronia then it scavenge the sophronia. If something scavenge the sophronia and it motley the genovera then it scavenge the genovera. The zolly does not chase the sophronia.", "logic": "\nScavenge(sophronia, zolly)\nScavenge(zolly, sophronia)\nUpcoming(zolly)\nStem(zolly, sophronia)\nRapacious(genovera)\nMotley(genovera, zolly)\nStem(genovera, sophronia)\nforall x (Scavenge(x, zolly) -> not Stem(zolly, genovera))\nforall x (Motley(x, sophronia) -> not Mimetic(sophronia))\nStem(zolly, genovera) and not Rapacious(zolly) -> Scavenge(zolly, sophronia)\nforall x (Stem(x, sophronia) -> Mimetic(x))\nforall x (Mimetic(x) -> Motley(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Mimetic(x) -> Motley(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Upcoming(x) and not Motley(x, sophronia) -> Scavenge(x, sophronia))\nforall x (Scavenge(x, sophronia) and Motley(x, genovera) -> Scavenge(x, genovera))\n\nnot Scavenge(zolly, sophronia)\n\ntherefore Scavenge(zolly, sophronia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The venita bald the corissa. The corissa bald the venita. The corissa is numeral. The corissa overdress the venita. The blake is likely. The blake refuse the corissa. The blake overdress the venita. If something bald the corissa then the corissa does not visit the blake. If something refuse the venita then the venita is not starlit. If the corissa overdress the blake and the corissa is not likely then the corissa bald the venita. If something overdress the venita then it is starlit. If something is starlit then it refuse the venita. If something is starlit then it refuse the venita. If something is numeral and it does not like the venita then it bald the venita. If something bald the venita and it refuse the blake then it bald the blake. The blake is starlit.", "logic": "\nBald(venita, corissa)\nBald(corissa, venita)\nNumeral(corissa)\nOverdress(corissa, venita)\nLikely(blake)\nRefuse(blake, corissa)\nOverdress(blake, venita)\nforall x (Bald(x, corissa) -> not Overdress(corissa, blake))\nforall x (Refuse(x, venita) -> not Starlit(venita))\nOverdress(corissa, blake) and not Likely(corissa) -> Bald(corissa, venita)\nforall x (Overdress(x, venita) -> Starlit(x))\nforall x (Starlit(x) -> Refuse(x, venita))\nforall x (Starlit(x) -> Refuse(x, venita))\nforall x (Numeral(x) and not Refuse(x, venita) -> Bald(x, venita))\nforall x (Bald(x, venita) and Refuse(x, blake) -> Bald(x, blake))\n\nStarlit(blake)\n\nOverdress(blake, venita) and forall x (Overdress(x, venita) -> Starlit(x)) -> therefore Starlit(blake)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The kym paginate the bonny. The bonny paginate the kym. The bonny is ingenious. The bonny federalise the kym. The dorothy is sapiens. The dorothy lapidify the bonny. The dorothy federalise the kym. If something paginate the bonny then the bonny does not visit the dorothy. If something lapidify the kym then the kym is not supple. If the bonny federalise the dorothy and the bonny is not sapiens then the bonny paginate the kym. If something federalise the kym then it is supple. If something is supple then it lapidify the kym. If something is supple then it lapidify the kym. If something is ingenious and it does not like the kym then it paginate the kym. If something paginate the kym and it lapidify the dorothy then it paginate the dorothy. The dorothy is not supple.", "logic": "\nPaginate(kym, bonny)\nPaginate(bonny, kym)\nIngenious(bonny)\nFederalise(bonny, kym)\nSapiens(dorothy)\nLapidify(dorothy, bonny)\nFederalise(dorothy, kym)\nforall x (Paginate(x, bonny) -> not Federalise(bonny, dorothy))\nforall x (Lapidify(x, kym) -> not Supple(kym))\nFederalise(bonny, dorothy) and not Sapiens(bonny) -> Paginate(bonny, kym)\nforall x (Federalise(x, kym) -> Supple(x))\nforall x (Supple(x) -> Lapidify(x, kym))\nforall x (Supple(x) -> Lapidify(x, kym))\nforall x (Ingenious(x) and not Lapidify(x, kym) -> Paginate(x, kym))\nforall x (Paginate(x, kym) and Lapidify(x, dorothy) -> Paginate(x, dorothy))\n\nnot Supple(dorothy)\n\nFederalise(dorothy, kym) and forall x (Federalise(x, kym) -> Supple(x)) -> therefore Supple(dorothy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The corby pleach the atalanta. The atalanta pleach the corby. The atalanta is fungoid. The atalanta buffer the corby. The meredith is aerobic. The meredith grant the atalanta. The meredith buffer the corby. If something pleach the atalanta then the atalanta does not visit the meredith. If something grant the corby then the corby is not tongueless. If the atalanta buffer the meredith and the atalanta is not aerobic then the atalanta pleach the corby. If something buffer the corby then it is tongueless. If something is tongueless then it grant the corby. If something is tongueless then it grant the corby. If something is fungoid and it does not like the corby then it pleach the corby. If something pleach the corby and it grant the meredith then it pleach the meredith. The meredith grant the corby.", "logic": "\nPleach(corby, atalanta)\nPleach(atalanta, corby)\nFungoid(atalanta)\nBuffer(atalanta, corby)\nAerobic(meredith)\nGrant(meredith, atalanta)\nBuffer(meredith, corby)\nforall x (Pleach(x, atalanta) -> not Buffer(atalanta, meredith))\nforall x (Grant(x, corby) -> not Tongueless(corby))\nBuffer(atalanta, meredith) and not Aerobic(atalanta) -> Pleach(atalanta, corby)\nforall x (Buffer(x, corby) -> Tongueless(x))\nforall x (Tongueless(x) -> Grant(x, corby))\nforall x (Tongueless(x) -> Grant(x, corby))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and not Grant(x, corby) -> Pleach(x, corby))\nforall x (Pleach(x, corby) and Grant(x, meredith) -> Pleach(x, meredith))\n\nGrant(meredith, corby)\n\nBuffer(meredith, corby) and forall x (Buffer(x, corby) -> Tongueless(x)) -> therefore Tongueless(meredith) Tongueless(meredith) and forall x (Tongueless(x) -> Grant(x, corby)) -> therefore Grant(meredith, corby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The cassi major the anastasia. The anastasia major the cassi. The anastasia is three. The anastasia bias the cassi. The elfie is flint. The elfie cronk the anastasia. The elfie bias the cassi. If something major the anastasia then the anastasia does not visit the elfie. If something cronk the cassi then the cassi is not marmorean. If the anastasia bias the elfie and the anastasia is not flint then the anastasia major the cassi. If something bias the cassi then it is marmorean. If something is marmorean then it cronk the cassi. If something is marmorean then it cronk the cassi. If something is three and it does not like the cassi then it major the cassi. If something major the cassi and it cronk the elfie then it major the elfie. The anastasia does not like the cassi.", "logic": "\nMajor(cassi, anastasia)\nMajor(anastasia, cassi)\nThree(anastasia)\nBias(anastasia, cassi)\nFlint(elfie)\nCronk(elfie, anastasia)\nBias(elfie, cassi)\nforall x (Major(x, anastasia) -> not Bias(anastasia, elfie))\nforall x (Cronk(x, cassi) -> not Marmorean(cassi))\nBias(anastasia, elfie) and not Flint(anastasia) -> Major(anastasia, cassi)\nforall x (Bias(x, cassi) -> Marmorean(x))\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Cronk(x, cassi))\nforall x (Marmorean(x) -> Cronk(x, cassi))\nforall x (Three(x) and not Cronk(x, cassi) -> Major(x, cassi))\nforall x (Major(x, cassi) and Cronk(x, elfie) -> Major(x, elfie))\n\nnot Cronk(anastasia, cassi)\n\nBias(anastasia, cassi) and forall x (Bias(x, cassi) -> Marmorean(x)) -> therefore Marmorean(anastasia) Marmorean(anastasia) and forall x (Marmorean(x) -> Cronk(x, cassi)) -> therefore Cronk(anastasia, cassi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The karyn pollute the madison. The madison pollute the karyn. The madison is hilar. The madison defraud the karyn. The reta is playful. The reta sorcerise the madison. The reta defraud the karyn. If something pollute the madison then the madison does not visit the reta. If something sorcerise the karyn then the karyn is not semiliquid. If the madison defraud the reta and the madison is not playful then the madison pollute the karyn. If something defraud the karyn then it is semiliquid. If something is semiliquid then it sorcerise the karyn. If something is semiliquid then it sorcerise the karyn. If something is hilar and it does not like the karyn then it pollute the karyn. If something pollute the karyn and it sorcerise the reta then it pollute the reta. The karyn is not semiliquid.", "logic": "\nPollute(karyn, madison)\nPollute(madison, karyn)\nHilar(madison)\nDefraud(madison, karyn)\nPlayful(reta)\nSorcerise(reta, madison)\nDefraud(reta, karyn)\nforall x (Pollute(x, madison) -> not Defraud(madison, reta))\nforall x (Sorcerise(x, karyn) -> not Semiliquid(karyn))\nDefraud(madison, reta) and not Playful(madison) -> Pollute(madison, karyn)\nforall x (Defraud(x, karyn) -> Semiliquid(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Sorcerise(x, karyn))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Sorcerise(x, karyn))\nforall x (Hilar(x) and not Sorcerise(x, karyn) -> Pollute(x, karyn))\nforall x (Pollute(x, karyn) and Sorcerise(x, reta) -> Pollute(x, reta))\n\nnot Semiliquid(karyn)\n\nDefraud(madison, karyn) and forall x (Defraud(x, karyn) -> Semiliquid(x)) -> therefore Semiliquid(madison) Semiliquid(madison) and forall x (Semiliquid(x) -> Sorcerise(x, karyn)) -> therefore Sorcerise(madison, karyn) Sorcerise(madison, karyn) and forall x (Sorcerise(x, karyn) -> not Semiliquid(karyn)) -> therefore not Semiliquid(karyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The bidget expense the emlyn. The emlyn expense the bidget. The emlyn is raiseable. The emlyn pressurize the bidget. The rubetta is cragfast. The rubetta scry the emlyn. The rubetta pressurize the bidget. If something expense the emlyn then the emlyn does not visit the rubetta. If something scry the bidget then the bidget is not scruffy. If the emlyn pressurize the rubetta and the emlyn is not cragfast then the emlyn expense the bidget. If something pressurize the bidget then it is scruffy. If something is scruffy then it scry the bidget. If something is scruffy then it scry the bidget. If something is raiseable and it does not like the bidget then it expense the bidget. If something expense the bidget and it scry the rubetta then it expense the rubetta. The bidget is scruffy.", "logic": "\nExpense(bidget, emlyn)\nExpense(emlyn, bidget)\nRaiseable(emlyn)\nPressurize(emlyn, bidget)\nCragfast(rubetta)\nScry(rubetta, emlyn)\nPressurize(rubetta, bidget)\nforall x (Expense(x, emlyn) -> not Pressurize(emlyn, rubetta))\nforall x (Scry(x, bidget) -> not Scruffy(bidget))\nPressurize(emlyn, rubetta) and not Cragfast(emlyn) -> Expense(emlyn, bidget)\nforall x (Pressurize(x, bidget) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Scruffy(x) -> Scry(x, bidget))\nforall x (Scruffy(x) -> Scry(x, bidget))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) and not Scry(x, bidget) -> Expense(x, bidget))\nforall x (Expense(x, bidget) and Scry(x, rubetta) -> Expense(x, rubetta))\n\nScruffy(bidget)\n\nPressurize(emlyn, bidget) and forall x (Pressurize(x, bidget) -> Scruffy(x)) -> therefore Scruffy(emlyn) Scruffy(emlyn) and forall x (Scruffy(x) -> Scry(x, bidget)) -> therefore Scry(emlyn, bidget) Scry(emlyn, bidget) and forall x (Scry(x, bidget) -> not Scruffy(bidget)) -> therefore not Scruffy(bidget)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The nessa sully the morry. The morry sully the nessa. The morry is cosmogonic. The morry squander the nessa. The gil is versatile. The gil enjoin the morry. The gil squander the nessa. If something sully the morry then the morry does not visit the gil. If something enjoin the nessa then the nessa is not slashed. If the morry squander the gil and the morry is not versatile then the morry sully the nessa. If something squander the nessa then it is slashed. If something is slashed then it enjoin the nessa. If something is slashed then it enjoin the nessa. If something is cosmogonic and it does not like the nessa then it sully the nessa. If something sully the nessa and it enjoin the gil then it sully the gil. The nessa does not like the nessa.", "logic": "\nSully(nessa, morry)\nSully(morry, nessa)\nCosmogonic(morry)\nSquander(morry, nessa)\nVersatile(gil)\nEnjoin(gil, morry)\nSquander(gil, nessa)\nforall x (Sully(x, morry) -> not Squander(morry, gil))\nforall x (Enjoin(x, nessa) -> not Slashed(nessa))\nSquander(morry, gil) and not Versatile(morry) -> Sully(morry, nessa)\nforall x (Squander(x, nessa) -> Slashed(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Enjoin(x, nessa))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Enjoin(x, nessa))\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) and not Enjoin(x, nessa) -> Sully(x, nessa))\nforall x (Sully(x, nessa) and Enjoin(x, gil) -> Sully(x, gil))\n\nnot Enjoin(nessa, nessa)\n\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Enjoin(x, nessa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The warde sovietize the ford. The ford sovietize the warde. The ford is seeing. The ford comprehend the warde. The allene is crazed. The allene rummage the ford. The allene comprehend the warde. If something sovietize the ford then the ford does not visit the allene. If something rummage the warde then the warde is not xcvi. If the ford comprehend the allene and the ford is not crazed then the ford sovietize the warde. If something comprehend the warde then it is xcvi. If something is xcvi then it rummage the warde. If something is xcvi then it rummage the warde. If something is seeing and it does not like the warde then it sovietize the warde. If something sovietize the warde and it rummage the allene then it sovietize the allene. The warde sovietize the allene.", "logic": "\nSovietize(warde, ford)\nSovietize(ford, warde)\nSeeing(ford)\nComprehend(ford, warde)\nCrazed(allene)\nRummage(allene, ford)\nComprehend(allene, warde)\nforall x (Sovietize(x, ford) -> not Comprehend(ford, allene))\nforall x (Rummage(x, warde) -> not Xcvi(warde))\nComprehend(ford, allene) and not Crazed(ford) -> Sovietize(ford, warde)\nforall x (Comprehend(x, warde) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Rummage(x, warde))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Rummage(x, warde))\nforall x (Seeing(x) and not Rummage(x, warde) -> Sovietize(x, warde))\nforall x (Sovietize(x, warde) and Rummage(x, allene) -> Sovietize(x, allene))\n\nSovietize(warde, allene)\n\nforall x (Sovietize(x, warde) and Rummage(x, allene) -> Sovietize(x, allene)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The guillema decompose the ethelred. The ethelred decompose the guillema. The ethelred is aggregated. The ethelred switch the guillema. The larina is magnified. The larina holystone the ethelred. The larina switch the guillema. If something decompose the ethelred then the ethelred does not visit the larina. If something holystone the guillema then the guillema is not fated. If the ethelred switch the larina and the ethelred is not magnified then the ethelred decompose the guillema. If something switch the guillema then it is fated. If something is fated then it holystone the guillema. If something is fated then it holystone the guillema. If something is aggregated and it does not like the guillema then it decompose the guillema. If something decompose the guillema and it holystone the larina then it decompose the larina. The larina does not chase the guillema.", "logic": "\nDecompose(guillema, ethelred)\nDecompose(ethelred, guillema)\nAggregated(ethelred)\nSwitch(ethelred, guillema)\nMagnified(larina)\nHolystone(larina, ethelred)\nSwitch(larina, guillema)\nforall x (Decompose(x, ethelred) -> not Switch(ethelred, larina))\nforall x (Holystone(x, guillema) -> not Fated(guillema))\nSwitch(ethelred, larina) and not Magnified(ethelred) -> Decompose(ethelred, guillema)\nforall x (Switch(x, guillema) -> Fated(x))\nforall x (Fated(x) -> Holystone(x, guillema))\nforall x (Fated(x) -> Holystone(x, guillema))\nforall x (Aggregated(x) and not Holystone(x, guillema) -> Decompose(x, guillema))\nforall x (Decompose(x, guillema) and Holystone(x, larina) -> Decompose(x, larina))\n\nnot Decompose(larina, guillema)\n\nforall x (Aggregated(x) and not Holystone(x, guillema) -> Decompose(x, guillema)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The amory gradate the lora. The lora gradate the amory. The lora is endocrinal. The lora revolt the amory. The paco is long. The paco separate the lora. The paco revolt the amory. If something gradate the lora then the lora does not visit the paco. If something separate the amory then the amory is not shrunken. If the lora revolt the paco and the lora is not long then the lora gradate the amory. If something revolt the amory then it is shrunken. If something is shrunken then it separate the amory. If something is shrunken then it separate the amory. If something is endocrinal and it does not like the amory then it gradate the amory. If something gradate the amory and it separate the paco then it gradate the paco. The lora gradate the paco.", "logic": "\nGradate(amory, lora)\nGradate(lora, amory)\nEndocrinal(lora)\nRevolt(lora, amory)\nLong(paco)\nSeparate(paco, lora)\nRevolt(paco, amory)\nforall x (Gradate(x, lora) -> not Revolt(lora, paco))\nforall x (Separate(x, amory) -> not Shrunken(amory))\nRevolt(lora, paco) and not Long(lora) -> Gradate(lora, amory)\nforall x (Revolt(x, amory) -> Shrunken(x))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) -> Separate(x, amory))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) -> Separate(x, amory))\nforall x (Endocrinal(x) and not Separate(x, amory) -> Gradate(x, amory))\nforall x (Gradate(x, amory) and Separate(x, paco) -> Gradate(x, paco))\n\nGradate(lora, paco)\n\nforall x (Gradate(x, amory) and Separate(x, paco) -> Gradate(x, paco)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The lizzie beat the ethelbert. The ethelbert beat the lizzie. The ethelbert is fashioned. The ethelbert understock the lizzie. The edgardo is cubelike. The edgardo preoccupy the ethelbert. The edgardo understock the lizzie. If something beat the ethelbert then the ethelbert does not visit the edgardo. If something preoccupy the lizzie then the lizzie is not blockaded. If the ethelbert understock the edgardo and the ethelbert is not cubelike then the ethelbert beat the lizzie. If something understock the lizzie then it is blockaded. If something is blockaded then it preoccupy the lizzie. If something is blockaded then it preoccupy the lizzie. If something is fashioned and it does not like the lizzie then it beat the lizzie. If something beat the lizzie and it preoccupy the edgardo then it beat the edgardo. The ethelbert does not like the ethelbert.", "logic": "\nBeat(lizzie, ethelbert)\nBeat(ethelbert, lizzie)\nFashioned(ethelbert)\nUnderstock(ethelbert, lizzie)\nCubelike(edgardo)\nPreoccupy(edgardo, ethelbert)\nUnderstock(edgardo, lizzie)\nforall x (Beat(x, ethelbert) -> not Understock(ethelbert, edgardo))\nforall x (Preoccupy(x, lizzie) -> not Blockaded(lizzie))\nUnderstock(ethelbert, edgardo) and not Cubelike(ethelbert) -> Beat(ethelbert, lizzie)\nforall x (Understock(x, lizzie) -> Blockaded(x))\nforall x (Blockaded(x) -> Preoccupy(x, lizzie))\nforall x (Blockaded(x) -> Preoccupy(x, lizzie))\nforall x (Fashioned(x) and not Preoccupy(x, lizzie) -> Beat(x, lizzie))\nforall x (Beat(x, lizzie) and Preoccupy(x, edgardo) -> Beat(x, edgardo))\n\nnot Preoccupy(ethelbert, ethelbert)\n\nnot Preoccupy(ethelbert, ethelbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The giovanna dream the bunny. The bunny dream the giovanna. The bunny is thoughtful. The bunny effeminise the giovanna. The octavius is despotical. The octavius deputise the bunny. The octavius effeminise the giovanna. If something dream the bunny then the bunny does not visit the octavius. If something deputise the giovanna then the giovanna is not limiting. If the bunny effeminise the octavius and the bunny is not despotical then the bunny dream the giovanna. If something effeminise the giovanna then it is limiting. If something is limiting then it deputise the giovanna. If something is limiting then it deputise the giovanna. If something is thoughtful and it does not like the giovanna then it dream the giovanna. If something dream the giovanna and it deputise the octavius then it dream the octavius. The octavius effeminise the bunny.", "logic": "\nDream(giovanna, bunny)\nDream(bunny, giovanna)\nThoughtful(bunny)\nEffeminise(bunny, giovanna)\nDespotical(octavius)\nDeputise(octavius, bunny)\nEffeminise(octavius, giovanna)\nforall x (Dream(x, bunny) -> not Effeminise(bunny, octavius))\nforall x (Deputise(x, giovanna) -> not Limiting(giovanna))\nEffeminise(bunny, octavius) and not Despotical(bunny) -> Dream(bunny, giovanna)\nforall x (Effeminise(x, giovanna) -> Limiting(x))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Deputise(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Limiting(x) -> Deputise(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) and not Deputise(x, giovanna) -> Dream(x, giovanna))\nforall x (Dream(x, giovanna) and Deputise(x, octavius) -> Dream(x, octavius))\n\nEffeminise(octavius, bunny)\n\nEffeminise(octavius, bunny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The odelinda dispute the ariel. The ariel dispute the odelinda. The ariel is araceous. The ariel birth the odelinda. The malcolm is late. The malcolm twill the ariel. The malcolm birth the odelinda. If something dispute the ariel then the ariel does not visit the malcolm. If something twill the odelinda then the odelinda is not pally. If the ariel birth the malcolm and the ariel is not late then the ariel dispute the odelinda. If something birth the odelinda then it is pally. If something is pally then it twill the odelinda. If something is pally then it twill the odelinda. If something is araceous and it does not like the odelinda then it dispute the odelinda. If something dispute the odelinda and it twill the malcolm then it dispute the malcolm. The odelinda does not like the malcolm.", "logic": "\nDispute(odelinda, ariel)\nDispute(ariel, odelinda)\nAraceous(ariel)\nBirth(ariel, odelinda)\nLate(malcolm)\nTwill(malcolm, ariel)\nBirth(malcolm, odelinda)\nforall x (Dispute(x, ariel) -> not Birth(ariel, malcolm))\nforall x (Twill(x, odelinda) -> not Pally(odelinda))\nBirth(ariel, malcolm) and not Late(ariel) -> Dispute(ariel, odelinda)\nforall x (Birth(x, odelinda) -> Pally(x))\nforall x (Pally(x) -> Twill(x, odelinda))\nforall x (Pally(x) -> Twill(x, odelinda))\nforall x (Araceous(x) and not Twill(x, odelinda) -> Dispute(x, odelinda))\nforall x (Dispute(x, odelinda) and Twill(x, malcolm) -> Dispute(x, malcolm))\n\nnot Twill(odelinda, malcolm)\n\nnot Twill(odelinda, malcolm) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "The reinhard pound the delcina. The delcina pound the reinhard. The delcina is mulish. The delcina bridle the reinhard. The liorah is buckshee. The liorah compete the delcina. The liorah bridle the reinhard. If something pound the delcina then the delcina does not visit the liorah. If something compete the reinhard then the reinhard is not beat. If the delcina bridle the liorah and the delcina is not buckshee then the delcina pound the reinhard. If something bridle the reinhard then it is beat. If something is beat then it compete the reinhard. If something is beat then it compete the reinhard. If something is mulish and it does not like the reinhard then it pound the reinhard. If something pound the reinhard and it compete the liorah then it pound the liorah. The delcina is nice.", "logic": "\nPound(reinhard, delcina)\nPound(delcina, reinhard)\nMulish(delcina)\nBridle(delcina, reinhard)\nBuckshee(liorah)\nCompete(liorah, delcina)\nBridle(liorah, reinhard)\nforall x (Pound(x, delcina) -> not Bridle(delcina, liorah))\nforall x (Compete(x, reinhard) -> not Beat(reinhard))\nBridle(delcina, liorah) and not Buckshee(delcina) -> Pound(delcina, reinhard)\nforall x (Bridle(x, reinhard) -> Beat(x))\nforall x (Beat(x) -> Compete(x, reinhard))\nforall x (Beat(x) -> Compete(x, reinhard))\nforall x (Mulish(x) and not Compete(x, reinhard) -> Pound(x, reinhard))\nforall x (Pound(x, reinhard) and Compete(x, liorah) -> Pound(x, liorah))\n\nNice(delcina)\n\nNice(delcina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1307"} {"premises": "Norrie is eolithic. Norrie is former. Norrie is not underwater. Norrie is coruscant. Norrie is carefree. Norrie is marxist. Norrie is demanding. If someone is underwater and carefree then they are demanding. If Norrie is marxist and Norrie is not underwater then Norrie is former. Norrie is marxist.", "logic": "\nEolithic(norrie)\nFormer(norrie)\nnot Underwater(norrie)\nCoruscant(norrie)\nCarefree(norrie)\nMarxist(norrie)\nDemanding(norrie)\nforall x (Underwater(x) and Carefree(x) -> Demanding(x))\nMarxist(norrie) and not Underwater(norrie) -> Former(norrie)\n\nMarxist(norrie)\n\ntherefore Marxist(norrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5232"} {"premises": "Aubrey is neural. Aubrey is adonic. Aubrey is not uncarpeted. Aubrey is untrusty. Aubrey is unlearned. Aubrey is unobliging. Aubrey is dominican. If someone is uncarpeted and unlearned then they are dominican. If Aubrey is unobliging and Aubrey is not uncarpeted then Aubrey is adonic. Aubrey is uncarpeted.", "logic": "\nNeural(aubrey)\nAdonic(aubrey)\nnot Uncarpeted(aubrey)\nUntrusty(aubrey)\nUnlearned(aubrey)\nUnobliging(aubrey)\nDominican(aubrey)\nforall x (Uncarpeted(x) and Unlearned(x) -> Dominican(x))\nUnobliging(aubrey) and not Uncarpeted(aubrey) -> Adonic(aubrey)\n\nUncarpeted(aubrey)\n\ntherefore not Uncarpeted(aubrey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5232"} {"premises": "Aleck is gallic. Barbey is wraithlike. Marvin is ravenous. Furry people are wraithlike. If someone is wraithlike and not aplacental then they are believable. All ravenous people are believable. If someone is ravenous and anabatic then they are nimble. If someone is gallic and aplacental then they are anabatic. If Barbey is not anabatic then Barbey is believable. Marvin is ravenous.", "logic": "\nGallic(aleck)\nWraithlike(barbey)\nRavenous(marvin)\nforall x (Aplacental(x) -> Wraithlike(x))\nforall x (Wraithlike(x) and not Aplacental(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Ravenous(x) -> Believable(x))\nforall x (Ravenous(x) and Anabatic(x) -> Nimble(x))\nforall x (Gallic(x) and Aplacental(x) -> Anabatic(x))\nnot Anabatic(barbey) -> Believable(barbey)\n\nRavenous(marvin)\n\ntherefore Ravenous(marvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Crista is meshugga. Christ is irenic. Ivy is burnable. Furry people are irenic. If someone is irenic and not gregorian then they are bitchy. All burnable people are bitchy. If someone is burnable and basic then they are nosocomial. If someone is meshugga and gregorian then they are basic. If Christ is not basic then Christ is bitchy. Crista is not meshugga.", "logic": "\nMeshugga(crista)\nIrenic(christ)\nBurnable(ivy)\nforall x (Gregorian(x) -> Irenic(x))\nforall x (Irenic(x) and not Gregorian(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) -> Bitchy(x))\nforall x (Burnable(x) and Basic(x) -> Nosocomial(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Gregorian(x) -> Basic(x))\nnot Basic(christ) -> Bitchy(christ)\n\nnot Meshugga(crista)\n\ntherefore Meshugga(crista)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Dimitrios is incredible. Brigitta is coequal. Ivan is guilty. Furry people are coequal. If someone is coequal and not unpunctual then they are disposable. All guilty people are disposable. If someone is guilty and supplicant then they are indignant. If someone is incredible and unpunctual then they are supplicant. If Brigitta is not supplicant then Brigitta is disposable. Ivan is disposable.", "logic": "\nIncredible(dimitrios)\nCoequal(brigitta)\nGuilty(ivan)\nforall x (Unpunctual(x) -> Coequal(x))\nforall x (Coequal(x) and not Unpunctual(x) -> Disposable(x))\nforall x (Guilty(x) -> Disposable(x))\nforall x (Guilty(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Indignant(x))\nforall x (Incredible(x) and Unpunctual(x) -> Supplicant(x))\nnot Supplicant(brigitta) -> Disposable(brigitta)\n\nDisposable(ivan)\n\nGuilty(ivan) and forall x (Guilty(x) -> Disposable(x)) -> therefore Disposable(ivan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Mitzi is oaken. Maggi is toupeed. Lorilyn is malformed. Furry people are toupeed. If someone is toupeed and not uric then they are crooked. All malformed people are crooked. If someone is malformed and worth then they are senior. If someone is oaken and uric then they are worth. If Maggi is not worth then Maggi is crooked. Lorilyn is not crooked.", "logic": "\nOaken(mitzi)\nToupeed(maggi)\nMalformed(lorilyn)\nforall x (Uric(x) -> Toupeed(x))\nforall x (Toupeed(x) and not Uric(x) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Malformed(x) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Malformed(x) and Worth(x) -> Senior(x))\nforall x (Oaken(x) and Uric(x) -> Worth(x))\nnot Worth(maggi) -> Crooked(maggi)\n\nnot Crooked(lorilyn)\n\nMalformed(lorilyn) and forall x (Malformed(x) -> Crooked(x)) -> therefore Crooked(lorilyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Otis is offhanded. Cora is underarm. Lita is binaural. Furry people are underarm. If someone is underarm and not hybrid then they are anterior. All binaural people are anterior. If someone is binaural and swedish then they are diocesan. If someone is offhanded and hybrid then they are swedish. If Cora is not swedish then Cora is anterior. Cora is not diocesan.", "logic": "\nOffhanded(otis)\nUnderarm(cora)\nBinaural(lita)\nforall x (Hybrid(x) -> Underarm(x))\nforall x (Underarm(x) and not Hybrid(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) -> Anterior(x))\nforall x (Binaural(x) and Swedish(x) -> Diocesan(x))\nforall x (Offhanded(x) and Hybrid(x) -> Swedish(x))\nnot Swedish(cora) -> Anterior(cora)\n\nnot Diocesan(cora)\n\nforall x (Binaural(x) and Swedish(x) -> Diocesan(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Dorian is linnean. Dion is staid. Pammi is caespitose. Furry people are staid. If someone is staid and not habitual then they are maltreated. All caespitose people are maltreated. If someone is caespitose and lxxiii then they are frostian. If someone is linnean and habitual then they are lxxiii. If Dion is not lxxiii then Dion is maltreated. Dion is lxxiii.", "logic": "\nLinnean(dorian)\nStaid(dion)\nCaespitose(pammi)\nforall x (Habitual(x) -> Staid(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) and not Habitual(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nforall x (Caespitose(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nforall x (Caespitose(x) and Lxxiii(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Linnean(x) and Habitual(x) -> Lxxiii(x))\nnot Lxxiii(dion) -> Maltreated(dion)\n\nLxxiii(dion)\n\nforall x (Linnean(x) and Habitual(x) -> Lxxiii(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Pier is percussive. Rustin is unaccented. Giuseppe is dastard. Furry people are unaccented. If someone is unaccented and not narial then they are pendant. All dastard people are pendant. If someone is dastard and unprepared then they are avid. If someone is percussive and narial then they are unprepared. If Rustin is not unprepared then Rustin is pendant. Rustin is not percussive.", "logic": "\nPercussive(pier)\nUnaccented(rustin)\nDastard(giuseppe)\nforall x (Narial(x) -> Unaccented(x))\nforall x (Unaccented(x) and not Narial(x) -> Pendant(x))\nforall x (Dastard(x) -> Pendant(x))\nforall x (Dastard(x) and Unprepared(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Percussive(x) and Narial(x) -> Unprepared(x))\nnot Unprepared(rustin) -> Pendant(rustin)\n\nnot Percussive(rustin)\n\nnot Percussive(rustin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Lucia is coiled. Basia is monoicous. Kathe is umbrageous. Furry people are monoicous. If someone is monoicous and not silvern then they are loyal. All umbrageous people are loyal. If someone is umbrageous and horizontal then they are ebony. If someone is coiled and silvern then they are horizontal. If Basia is not horizontal then Basia is loyal. Basia is silvern.", "logic": "\nCoiled(lucia)\nMonoicous(basia)\nUmbrageous(kathe)\nforall x (Silvern(x) -> Monoicous(x))\nforall x (Monoicous(x) and not Silvern(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Umbrageous(x) and Horizontal(x) -> Ebony(x))\nforall x (Coiled(x) and Silvern(x) -> Horizontal(x))\nnot Horizontal(basia) -> Loyal(basia)\n\nSilvern(basia)\n\nSilvern(basia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-3087"} {"premises": "Mayer is equivocal. Mayer is chichi. Mayer is evergreen. Mayer is combustive. Mayer is not shredded. Mayer is not sorry. Mayer is sideways. Big, combustive things are sideways. All shredded things are not combustive. If Mayer is evergreen then Mayer is combustive. Mayer is combustive.", "logic": "\nEquivocal(mayer)\nChichi(mayer)\nEvergreen(mayer)\nCombustive(mayer)\nnot Shredded(mayer)\nnot Sorry(mayer)\nSideways(mayer)\nforall x (Equivocal(x) and Combustive(x) -> Sideways(x))\nforall x (Shredded(x) -> not Combustive(x))\nEvergreen(mayer) -> Combustive(mayer)\n\nCombustive(mayer)\n\ntherefore Combustive(mayer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3872"} {"premises": "Ardra is spermous. Ardra is altaic. Ardra is unexampled. Ardra is incident. Ardra is not brimless. Ardra is not unaffixed. Ardra is immoveable. Big, incident things are immoveable. All brimless things are not incident. If Ardra is unexampled then Ardra is incident. Ardra is not altaic.", "logic": "\nSpermous(ardra)\nAltaic(ardra)\nUnexampled(ardra)\nIncident(ardra)\nnot Brimless(ardra)\nnot Unaffixed(ardra)\nImmoveable(ardra)\nforall x (Spermous(x) and Incident(x) -> Immoveable(x))\nforall x (Brimless(x) -> not Incident(x))\nUnexampled(ardra) -> Incident(ardra)\n\nnot Altaic(ardra)\n\ntherefore Altaic(ardra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3872"} {"premises": "The josephina is sinistral. Round things are not steady. Red, nagging things are steady. If the josephina is not chordal then the josephina is sinistral. If something is sinistral then it is nagging. If the josephina is steady and the josephina is not chordal then the josephina is flustered. If something is nagging then it is flustered. The josephina is sinistral.", "logic": "\nSinistral(josephina)\nforall x (Chordal(x) -> not Steady(x))\nforall x (Flustered(x) and Nagging(x) -> Steady(x))\nnot Chordal(josephina) -> Sinistral(josephina)\nforall x (Sinistral(x) -> Nagging(x))\nSteady(josephina) and not Chordal(josephina) -> Flustered(josephina)\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Flustered(x))\n\nSinistral(josephina)\n\ntherefore Sinistral(josephina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The reena is achromatic. Round things are not backed. Red, wheezy things are backed. If the reena is not leprose then the reena is achromatic. If something is achromatic then it is wheezy. If the reena is backed and the reena is not leprose then the reena is opencut. If something is wheezy then it is opencut. The reena is not achromatic.", "logic": "\nAchromatic(reena)\nforall x (Leprose(x) -> not Backed(x))\nforall x (Opencut(x) and Wheezy(x) -> Backed(x))\nnot Leprose(reena) -> Achromatic(reena)\nforall x (Achromatic(x) -> Wheezy(x))\nBacked(reena) and not Leprose(reena) -> Opencut(reena)\nforall x (Wheezy(x) -> Opencut(x))\n\nnot Achromatic(reena)\n\ntherefore Achromatic(reena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The merle is crowning. Round things are not buirdly. Red, weaponless things are buirdly. If the merle is not unbuttoned then the merle is crowning. If something is crowning then it is weaponless. If the merle is buirdly and the merle is not unbuttoned then the merle is grapy. If something is weaponless then it is grapy. The merle is weaponless.", "logic": "\nCrowning(merle)\nforall x (Unbuttoned(x) -> not Buirdly(x))\nforall x (Grapy(x) and Weaponless(x) -> Buirdly(x))\nnot Unbuttoned(merle) -> Crowning(merle)\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Weaponless(x))\nBuirdly(merle) and not Unbuttoned(merle) -> Grapy(merle)\nforall x (Weaponless(x) -> Grapy(x))\n\nWeaponless(merle)\n\nCrowning(merle) and forall x (Crowning(x) -> Weaponless(x)) -> therefore Weaponless(merle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The ken is pubic. Round things are not leaky. Red, edematous things are leaky. If the ken is not recorded then the ken is pubic. If something is pubic then it is edematous. If the ken is leaky and the ken is not recorded then the ken is smallish. If something is edematous then it is smallish. The ken is not edematous.", "logic": "\nPubic(ken)\nforall x (Recorded(x) -> not Leaky(x))\nforall x (Smallish(x) and Edematous(x) -> Leaky(x))\nnot Recorded(ken) -> Pubic(ken)\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Edematous(x))\nLeaky(ken) and not Recorded(ken) -> Smallish(ken)\nforall x (Edematous(x) -> Smallish(x))\n\nnot Edematous(ken)\n\nPubic(ken) and forall x (Pubic(x) -> Edematous(x)) -> therefore Edematous(ken)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The dolora is suffering. Round things are not relaxed. Red, uncurbed things are relaxed. If the dolora is not twopenny then the dolora is suffering. If something is suffering then it is uncurbed. If the dolora is relaxed and the dolora is not twopenny then the dolora is legible. If something is uncurbed then it is legible. The dolora is legible.", "logic": "\nSuffering(dolora)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> not Relaxed(x))\nforall x (Legible(x) and Uncurbed(x) -> Relaxed(x))\nnot Twopenny(dolora) -> Suffering(dolora)\nforall x (Suffering(x) -> Uncurbed(x))\nRelaxed(dolora) and not Twopenny(dolora) -> Legible(dolora)\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) -> Legible(x))\n\nLegible(dolora)\n\nSuffering(dolora) and forall x (Suffering(x) -> Uncurbed(x)) -> therefore Uncurbed(dolora) Uncurbed(dolora) and forall x (Uncurbed(x) -> Legible(x)) -> therefore Legible(dolora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The anthony is towering. Round things are not prosaic. Red, skirting things are prosaic. If the anthony is not holy then the anthony is towering. If something is towering then it is skirting. If the anthony is prosaic and the anthony is not holy then the anthony is dauntless. If something is skirting then it is dauntless. The anthony is not dauntless.", "logic": "\nTowering(anthony)\nforall x (Holy(x) -> not Prosaic(x))\nforall x (Dauntless(x) and Skirting(x) -> Prosaic(x))\nnot Holy(anthony) -> Towering(anthony)\nforall x (Towering(x) -> Skirting(x))\nProsaic(anthony) and not Holy(anthony) -> Dauntless(anthony)\nforall x (Skirting(x) -> Dauntless(x))\n\nnot Dauntless(anthony)\n\nTowering(anthony) and forall x (Towering(x) -> Skirting(x)) -> therefore Skirting(anthony) Skirting(anthony) and forall x (Skirting(x) -> Dauntless(x)) -> therefore Dauntless(anthony)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The con is lenitive. Round things are not corrupted. Red, angered things are corrupted. If the con is not erose then the con is lenitive. If something is lenitive then it is angered. If the con is corrupted and the con is not erose then the con is adapted. If something is angered then it is adapted. The con is corrupted.", "logic": "\nLenitive(con)\nforall x (Erose(x) -> not Corrupted(x))\nforall x (Adapted(x) and Angered(x) -> Corrupted(x))\nnot Erose(con) -> Lenitive(con)\nforall x (Lenitive(x) -> Angered(x))\nCorrupted(con) and not Erose(con) -> Adapted(con)\nforall x (Angered(x) -> Adapted(x))\n\nCorrupted(con)\n\nLenitive(con) and forall x (Lenitive(x) -> Angered(x)) -> therefore Angered(con) Angered(con) and forall x (Angered(x) -> Adapted(x)) -> therefore Adapted(con) Lenitive(con) and forall x (Lenitive(x) -> Angered(x)) -> therefore Angered(con) Adapted(con) and Angered(con) and forall x (Adapted(x) and Angered(x) -> Corrupted(x)) -> therefore Corrupted(con)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The daria is unsanitary. Round things are not ministrant. Red, branchy things are ministrant. If the daria is not pursy then the daria is unsanitary. If something is unsanitary then it is branchy. If the daria is ministrant and the daria is not pursy then the daria is autonomic. If something is branchy then it is autonomic. The daria is not ministrant.", "logic": "\nUnsanitary(daria)\nforall x (Pursy(x) -> not Ministrant(x))\nforall x (Autonomic(x) and Branchy(x) -> Ministrant(x))\nnot Pursy(daria) -> Unsanitary(daria)\nforall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Branchy(x))\nMinistrant(daria) and not Pursy(daria) -> Autonomic(daria)\nforall x (Branchy(x) -> Autonomic(x))\n\nnot Ministrant(daria)\n\nUnsanitary(daria) and forall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Branchy(x)) -> therefore Branchy(daria) Branchy(daria) and forall x (Branchy(x) -> Autonomic(x)) -> therefore Autonomic(daria) Unsanitary(daria) and forall x (Unsanitary(x) -> Branchy(x)) -> therefore Branchy(daria) Autonomic(daria) and Branchy(daria) and forall x (Autonomic(x) and Branchy(x) -> Ministrant(x)) -> therefore Ministrant(daria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The valene is sinitic. Round things are not brimless. Red, difficult things are brimless. If the valene is not valvular then the valene is sinitic. If something is sinitic then it is difficult. If the valene is brimless and the valene is not valvular then the valene is fouled. If something is difficult then it is fouled. The valene does not visit the valene.", "logic": "\nSinitic(valene)\nforall x (Valvular(x) -> not Brimless(x))\nforall x (Fouled(x) and Difficult(x) -> Brimless(x))\nnot Valvular(valene) -> Sinitic(valene)\nforall x (Sinitic(x) -> Difficult(x))\nBrimless(valene) and not Valvular(valene) -> Fouled(valene)\nforall x (Difficult(x) -> Fouled(x))\n\nnot Visits(valene, valene)\n\nnot Visits(valene, valene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The marje is sacculated. Round things are not actionable. Red, untired things are actionable. If the marje is not bregmatic then the marje is sacculated. If something is sacculated then it is untired. If the marje is actionable and the marje is not bregmatic then the marje is tubeless. If something is untired then it is tubeless. The marje eats the marje.", "logic": "\nSacculated(marje)\nforall x (Bregmatic(x) -> not Actionable(x))\nforall x (Tubeless(x) and Untired(x) -> Actionable(x))\nnot Bregmatic(marje) -> Sacculated(marje)\nforall x (Sacculated(x) -> Untired(x))\nActionable(marje) and not Bregmatic(marje) -> Tubeless(marje)\nforall x (Untired(x) -> Tubeless(x))\n\nEats(marje, marje)\n\nEats(marje, marje) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The jenilee is leaflike. Round things are not detractive. Red, aligned things are detractive. If the jenilee is not mailed then the jenilee is leaflike. If something is leaflike then it is aligned. If the jenilee is detractive and the jenilee is not mailed then the jenilee is shorthand. If something is aligned then it is shorthand. The jenilee is not mailed.", "logic": "\nLeaflike(jenilee)\nforall x (Mailed(x) -> not Detractive(x))\nforall x (Shorthand(x) and Aligned(x) -> Detractive(x))\nnot Mailed(jenilee) -> Leaflike(jenilee)\nforall x (Leaflike(x) -> Aligned(x))\nDetractive(jenilee) and not Mailed(jenilee) -> Shorthand(jenilee)\nforall x (Aligned(x) -> Shorthand(x))\n\nnot Mailed(jenilee)\n\nnot Mailed(jenilee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The quentin is tubercular. Round things are not pyrrhic. Red, domestic things are pyrrhic. If the quentin is not linguistic then the quentin is tubercular. If something is tubercular then it is domestic. If the quentin is pyrrhic and the quentin is not linguistic then the quentin is cityfied. If something is domestic then it is cityfied. The quentin needs the quentin.", "logic": "\nTubercular(quentin)\nforall x (Linguistic(x) -> not Pyrrhic(x))\nforall x (Cityfied(x) and Domestic(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nnot Linguistic(quentin) -> Tubercular(quentin)\nforall x (Tubercular(x) -> Domestic(x))\nPyrrhic(quentin) and not Linguistic(quentin) -> Cityfied(quentin)\nforall x (Domestic(x) -> Cityfied(x))\n\nNeeds(quentin, quentin)\n\nNeeds(quentin, quentin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1237"} {"premises": "The callie is fatherless. Round, fatherless things are not dynamic. If the callie is slushy and the callie is dynamic then the callie is not fatherless. If the callie is fatherless then the callie is prongy. If something is prongy then it is slushy. If something is fatherless and not slushy then it is vexed. Kind, fatherless things are vexed. The callie is fatherless.", "logic": "\nFatherless(callie)\nforall x (Slushy(x) and Fatherless(x) -> not Dynamic(x))\nSlushy(callie) and Dynamic(callie) -> not Fatherless(callie)\nFatherless(callie) -> Prongy(callie)\nforall x (Prongy(x) -> Slushy(x))\nforall x (Fatherless(x) and not Slushy(x) -> Vexed(x))\nforall x (Prongy(x) and Fatherless(x) -> Vexed(x))\n\nFatherless(callie)\n\ntherefore Fatherless(callie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The sarene is alleviated. Round, alleviated things are not antiblack. If the sarene is orthopedic and the sarene is antiblack then the sarene is not alleviated. If the sarene is alleviated then the sarene is screechy. If something is screechy then it is orthopedic. If something is alleviated and not orthopedic then it is stocked. Kind, alleviated things are stocked. The sarene is not alleviated.", "logic": "\nAlleviated(sarene)\nforall x (Orthopedic(x) and Alleviated(x) -> not Antiblack(x))\nOrthopedic(sarene) and Antiblack(sarene) -> not Alleviated(sarene)\nAlleviated(sarene) -> Screechy(sarene)\nforall x (Screechy(x) -> Orthopedic(x))\nforall x (Alleviated(x) and not Orthopedic(x) -> Stocked(x))\nforall x (Screechy(x) and Alleviated(x) -> Stocked(x))\n\nnot Alleviated(sarene)\n\ntherefore Alleviated(sarene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The marcile is quadrate. Round, quadrate things are not swart. If the marcile is septuple and the marcile is swart then the marcile is not quadrate. If the marcile is quadrate then the marcile is smoothbore. If something is smoothbore then it is septuple. If something is quadrate and not septuple then it is backswept. Kind, quadrate things are backswept. The marcile is smoothbore.", "logic": "\nQuadrate(marcile)\nforall x (Septuple(x) and Quadrate(x) -> not Swart(x))\nSeptuple(marcile) and Swart(marcile) -> not Quadrate(marcile)\nQuadrate(marcile) -> Smoothbore(marcile)\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) -> Septuple(x))\nforall x (Quadrate(x) and not Septuple(x) -> Backswept(x))\nforall x (Smoothbore(x) and Quadrate(x) -> Backswept(x))\n\nSmoothbore(marcile)\n\nQuadrate(marcile) and Quadrate(marcile) -> Smoothbore(marcile) -> therefore Smoothbore(marcile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The amelia is luminous. Round, luminous things are not peccant. If the amelia is dietetic and the amelia is peccant then the amelia is not luminous. If the amelia is luminous then the amelia is duncish. If something is duncish then it is dietetic. If something is luminous and not dietetic then it is splenetic. Kind, luminous things are splenetic. The amelia is not duncish.", "logic": "\nLuminous(amelia)\nforall x (Dietetic(x) and Luminous(x) -> not Peccant(x))\nDietetic(amelia) and Peccant(amelia) -> not Luminous(amelia)\nLuminous(amelia) -> Duncish(amelia)\nforall x (Duncish(x) -> Dietetic(x))\nforall x (Luminous(x) and not Dietetic(x) -> Splenetic(x))\nforall x (Duncish(x) and Luminous(x) -> Splenetic(x))\n\nnot Duncish(amelia)\n\nLuminous(amelia) and Luminous(amelia) -> Duncish(amelia) -> therefore Duncish(amelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The garrott is fungoid. Round, fungoid things are not knockout. If the garrott is puckish and the garrott is knockout then the garrott is not fungoid. If the garrott is fungoid then the garrott is rosy. If something is rosy then it is puckish. If something is fungoid and not puckish then it is eleventh. Kind, fungoid things are eleventh. The garrott is eleventh.", "logic": "\nFungoid(garrott)\nforall x (Puckish(x) and Fungoid(x) -> not Knockout(x))\nPuckish(garrott) and Knockout(garrott) -> not Fungoid(garrott)\nFungoid(garrott) -> Rosy(garrott)\nforall x (Rosy(x) -> Puckish(x))\nforall x (Fungoid(x) and not Puckish(x) -> Eleventh(x))\nforall x (Rosy(x) and Fungoid(x) -> Eleventh(x))\n\nEleventh(garrott)\n\nFungoid(garrott) and Fungoid(garrott) -> Rosy(garrott) -> therefore Rosy(garrott) Rosy(garrott) and Fungoid(garrott) and forall x (Rosy(x) and Fungoid(x) -> Eleventh(x)) -> therefore Eleventh(garrott)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The yoko is precarious. Round, precarious things are not obtainable. If the yoko is ironlike and the yoko is obtainable then the yoko is not precarious. If the yoko is precarious then the yoko is clunky. If something is clunky then it is ironlike. If something is precarious and not ironlike then it is grownup. Kind, precarious things are grownup. The yoko is not ironlike.", "logic": "\nPrecarious(yoko)\nforall x (Ironlike(x) and Precarious(x) -> not Obtainable(x))\nIronlike(yoko) and Obtainable(yoko) -> not Precarious(yoko)\nPrecarious(yoko) -> Clunky(yoko)\nforall x (Clunky(x) -> Ironlike(x))\nforall x (Precarious(x) and not Ironlike(x) -> Grownup(x))\nforall x (Clunky(x) and Precarious(x) -> Grownup(x))\n\nnot Ironlike(yoko)\n\nPrecarious(yoko) and Precarious(yoko) -> Clunky(yoko) -> therefore Clunky(yoko) Clunky(yoko) and forall x (Clunky(x) -> Ironlike(x)) -> therefore Ironlike(yoko)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The janette is twiglike. Round, twiglike things are not operative. If the janette is deathlike and the janette is operative then the janette is not twiglike. If the janette is twiglike then the janette is adscript. If something is adscript then it is deathlike. If something is twiglike and not deathlike then it is hydric. Kind, twiglike things are hydric. The janette is not operative.", "logic": "\nTwiglike(janette)\nforall x (Deathlike(x) and Twiglike(x) -> not Operative(x))\nDeathlike(janette) and Operative(janette) -> not Twiglike(janette)\nTwiglike(janette) -> Adscript(janette)\nforall x (Adscript(x) -> Deathlike(x))\nforall x (Twiglike(x) and not Deathlike(x) -> Hydric(x))\nforall x (Adscript(x) and Twiglike(x) -> Hydric(x))\n\nnot Operative(janette)\n\nTwiglike(janette) and Twiglike(janette) -> Adscript(janette) -> therefore Adscript(janette) Adscript(janette) and forall x (Adscript(x) -> Deathlike(x)) -> therefore Deathlike(janette) Deathlike(janette) and Twiglike(janette) and forall x (Deathlike(x) and Twiglike(x) -> not Operative(x)) -> therefore not Operative(janette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The letty is overstrung. Round, overstrung things are not squalling. If the letty is stung and the letty is squalling then the letty is not overstrung. If the letty is overstrung then the letty is carefree. If something is carefree then it is stung. If something is overstrung and not stung then it is intragroup. Kind, overstrung things are intragroup. The letty is squalling.", "logic": "\nOverstrung(letty)\nforall x (Stung(x) and Overstrung(x) -> not Squalling(x))\nStung(letty) and Squalling(letty) -> not Overstrung(letty)\nOverstrung(letty) -> Carefree(letty)\nforall x (Carefree(x) -> Stung(x))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) and not Stung(x) -> Intragroup(x))\nforall x (Carefree(x) and Overstrung(x) -> Intragroup(x))\n\nSqualling(letty)\n\nOverstrung(letty) and Overstrung(letty) -> Carefree(letty) -> therefore Carefree(letty) Carefree(letty) and forall x (Carefree(x) -> Stung(x)) -> therefore Stung(letty) Stung(letty) and Overstrung(letty) and forall x (Stung(x) and Overstrung(x) -> not Squalling(x)) -> therefore not Squalling(letty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The carlena is etched. Round, etched things are not nonextant. If the carlena is slanted and the carlena is nonextant then the carlena is not etched. If the carlena is etched then the carlena is taxing. If something is taxing then it is slanted. If something is etched and not slanted then it is declarable. Kind, etched things are declarable. The carlena does not like the carlena.", "logic": "\nEtched(carlena)\nforall x (Slanted(x) and Etched(x) -> not Nonextant(x))\nSlanted(carlena) and Nonextant(carlena) -> not Etched(carlena)\nEtched(carlena) -> Taxing(carlena)\nforall x (Taxing(x) -> Slanted(x))\nforall x (Etched(x) and not Slanted(x) -> Declarable(x))\nforall x (Taxing(x) and Etched(x) -> Declarable(x))\n\nnot Likes(carlena, carlena)\n\nnot Likes(carlena, carlena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "The sander is eloquent. Round, eloquent things are not extensile. If the sander is autosomal and the sander is extensile then the sander is not eloquent. If the sander is eloquent then the sander is songful. If something is songful then it is autosomal. If something is eloquent and not autosomal then it is sprawling. Kind, eloquent things are sprawling. The sander visits the sander.", "logic": "\nEloquent(sander)\nforall x (Autosomal(x) and Eloquent(x) -> not Extensile(x))\nAutosomal(sander) and Extensile(sander) -> not Eloquent(sander)\nEloquent(sander) -> Songful(sander)\nforall x (Songful(x) -> Autosomal(x))\nforall x (Eloquent(x) and not Autosomal(x) -> Sprawling(x))\nforall x (Songful(x) and Eloquent(x) -> Sprawling(x))\n\nVisits(sander, sander)\n\nVisits(sander, sander) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-183"} {"premises": "Ryan is ototoxic. Ryan is tattered. Ryan is resident. Ryan is sunlit. Ryan is undecided. Ryan is not hominal. Ryan is militant. Carin is ototoxic. Carin is tattered. Carin is resident. Carin is not sunlit. Carin is not undecided. Carin is not hominal. Carin is not militant. White things are undecided. If something is hominal then it is undecided. Rough, militant things are resident. Cold things are resident. If something is resident and hominal then it is militant. All militant things are tattered. All sunlit, hominal things are ototoxic. If Ryan is not undecided then Ryan is sunlit. Carin is resident.", "logic": "\nOtotoxic(ryan)\nTattered(ryan)\nResident(ryan)\nSunlit(ryan)\nUndecided(ryan)\nnot Hominal(ryan)\nMilitant(ryan)\nOtotoxic(carin)\nTattered(carin)\nResident(carin)\nnot Sunlit(carin)\nnot Undecided(carin)\nnot Hominal(carin)\nnot Militant(carin)\nforall x (Hominal(x) -> Undecided(x))\nforall x (Hominal(x) -> Undecided(x))\nforall x (Undecided(x) and Militant(x) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Ototoxic(x) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Resident(x) and Hominal(x) -> Militant(x))\nforall x (Militant(x) -> Tattered(x))\nforall x (Sunlit(x) and Hominal(x) -> Ototoxic(x))\nnot Undecided(ryan) -> Sunlit(ryan)\n\nResident(carin)\n\ntherefore Resident(carin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4595"} {"premises": "Andres is seeing. Andres is vegetive. Andres is undismayed. Andres is hindermost. Andres is scowling. Andres is not absent. Andres is practical. Maryjo is seeing. Maryjo is vegetive. Maryjo is undismayed. Maryjo is not hindermost. Maryjo is not scowling. Maryjo is not absent. Maryjo is not practical. White things are scowling. If something is absent then it is scowling. Rough, practical things are undismayed. Cold things are undismayed. If something is undismayed and absent then it is practical. All practical things are vegetive. All hindermost, absent things are seeing. If Andres is not scowling then Andres is hindermost. Maryjo is not seeing.", "logic": "\nSeeing(andres)\nVegetive(andres)\nUndismayed(andres)\nHindermost(andres)\nScowling(andres)\nnot Absent(andres)\nPractical(andres)\nSeeing(maryjo)\nVegetive(maryjo)\nUndismayed(maryjo)\nnot Hindermost(maryjo)\nnot Scowling(maryjo)\nnot Absent(maryjo)\nnot Practical(maryjo)\nforall x (Absent(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Absent(x) -> Scowling(x))\nforall x (Scowling(x) and Practical(x) -> Undismayed(x))\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Undismayed(x))\nforall x (Undismayed(x) and Absent(x) -> Practical(x))\nforall x (Practical(x) -> Vegetive(x))\nforall x (Hindermost(x) and Absent(x) -> Seeing(x))\nnot Scowling(andres) -> Hindermost(andres)\n\nnot Seeing(maryjo)\n\ntherefore Seeing(maryjo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4595"} {"premises": "The karil is twinkly. If the karil is dampish then the karil is acanthoid. Round, filmy things are dampish. If the karil is twinkly and the karil is filmy then the karil is acanthoid. If the karil is unclipped and the karil is acanthoid then the karil is twinkly. If the karil is twinkly then the karil is filmy. Young things are filmy. The karil is twinkly.", "logic": "\nTwinkly(karil)\nDampish(karil) -> Acanthoid(karil)\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) and Filmy(x) -> Dampish(x))\nTwinkly(karil) and Filmy(karil) -> Acanthoid(karil)\nUnclipped(karil) and Acanthoid(karil) -> Twinkly(karil)\nTwinkly(karil) -> Filmy(karil)\nforall x (Unclipped(x) -> Filmy(x))\n\nTwinkly(karil)\n\ntherefore Twinkly(karil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The prent is nonpareil. If the prent is disparate then the prent is played. Round, galilean things are disparate. If the prent is nonpareil and the prent is galilean then the prent is played. If the prent is deadly and the prent is played then the prent is nonpareil. If the prent is nonpareil then the prent is galilean. Young things are galilean. The prent is not nonpareil.", "logic": "\nNonpareil(prent)\nDisparate(prent) -> Played(prent)\nforall x (Played(x) and Galilean(x) -> Disparate(x))\nNonpareil(prent) and Galilean(prent) -> Played(prent)\nDeadly(prent) and Played(prent) -> Nonpareil(prent)\nNonpareil(prent) -> Galilean(prent)\nforall x (Deadly(x) -> Galilean(x))\n\nnot Nonpareil(prent)\n\ntherefore Nonpareil(prent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The jorge is dalmatian. If the jorge is plural then the jorge is bully. Round, latin things are plural. If the jorge is dalmatian and the jorge is latin then the jorge is bully. If the jorge is epiphytic and the jorge is bully then the jorge is dalmatian. If the jorge is dalmatian then the jorge is latin. Young things are latin. The jorge is latin.", "logic": "\nDalmatian(jorge)\nPlural(jorge) -> Bully(jorge)\nforall x (Bully(x) and Latin(x) -> Plural(x))\nDalmatian(jorge) and Latin(jorge) -> Bully(jorge)\nEpiphytic(jorge) and Bully(jorge) -> Dalmatian(jorge)\nDalmatian(jorge) -> Latin(jorge)\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) -> Latin(x))\n\nLatin(jorge)\n\nDalmatian(jorge) and Dalmatian(jorge) -> Latin(jorge) -> therefore Latin(jorge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The hildy is indecisive. If the hildy is spread then the hildy is estimable. Round, undecided things are spread. If the hildy is indecisive and the hildy is undecided then the hildy is estimable. If the hildy is gamy and the hildy is estimable then the hildy is indecisive. If the hildy is indecisive then the hildy is undecided. Young things are undecided. The hildy is not undecided.", "logic": "\nIndecisive(hildy)\nSpread(hildy) -> Estimable(hildy)\nforall x (Estimable(x) and Undecided(x) -> Spread(x))\nIndecisive(hildy) and Undecided(hildy) -> Estimable(hildy)\nGamy(hildy) and Estimable(hildy) -> Indecisive(hildy)\nIndecisive(hildy) -> Undecided(hildy)\nforall x (Gamy(x) -> Undecided(x))\n\nnot Undecided(hildy)\n\nIndecisive(hildy) and Indecisive(hildy) -> Undecided(hildy) -> therefore Undecided(hildy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The gaspar is coiling. If the gaspar is alveolar then the gaspar is twilled. Round, decrepit things are alveolar. If the gaspar is coiling and the gaspar is decrepit then the gaspar is twilled. If the gaspar is eighteen and the gaspar is twilled then the gaspar is coiling. If the gaspar is coiling then the gaspar is decrepit. Young things are decrepit. The gaspar is twilled.", "logic": "\nCoiling(gaspar)\nAlveolar(gaspar) -> Twilled(gaspar)\nforall x (Twilled(x) and Decrepit(x) -> Alveolar(x))\nCoiling(gaspar) and Decrepit(gaspar) -> Twilled(gaspar)\nEighteen(gaspar) and Twilled(gaspar) -> Coiling(gaspar)\nCoiling(gaspar) -> Decrepit(gaspar)\nforall x (Eighteen(x) -> Decrepit(x))\n\nTwilled(gaspar)\n\nCoiling(gaspar) and Coiling(gaspar) -> Decrepit(gaspar) -> therefore Decrepit(gaspar) Coiling(gaspar) and Decrepit(gaspar) and Coiling(gaspar) and Decrepit(gaspar) -> Twilled(gaspar) -> therefore Twilled(gaspar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The rosamund is agamic. If the rosamund is quadratic then the rosamund is ternary. Round, necked things are quadratic. If the rosamund is agamic and the rosamund is necked then the rosamund is ternary. If the rosamund is unnoticed and the rosamund is ternary then the rosamund is agamic. If the rosamund is agamic then the rosamund is necked. Young things are necked. The rosamund is not ternary.", "logic": "\nAgamic(rosamund)\nQuadratic(rosamund) -> Ternary(rosamund)\nforall x (Ternary(x) and Necked(x) -> Quadratic(x))\nAgamic(rosamund) and Necked(rosamund) -> Ternary(rosamund)\nUnnoticed(rosamund) and Ternary(rosamund) -> Agamic(rosamund)\nAgamic(rosamund) -> Necked(rosamund)\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) -> Necked(x))\n\nnot Ternary(rosamund)\n\nAgamic(rosamund) and Agamic(rosamund) -> Necked(rosamund) -> therefore Necked(rosamund) Agamic(rosamund) and Necked(rosamund) and Agamic(rosamund) and Necked(rosamund) -> Ternary(rosamund) -> therefore Ternary(rosamund)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The raina is riparian. If the raina is rocklike then the raina is flagellate. Round, unwise things are rocklike. If the raina is riparian and the raina is unwise then the raina is flagellate. If the raina is shrubby and the raina is flagellate then the raina is riparian. If the raina is riparian then the raina is unwise. Young things are unwise. The raina is rocklike.", "logic": "\nRiparian(raina)\nRocklike(raina) -> Flagellate(raina)\nforall x (Flagellate(x) and Unwise(x) -> Rocklike(x))\nRiparian(raina) and Unwise(raina) -> Flagellate(raina)\nShrubby(raina) and Flagellate(raina) -> Riparian(raina)\nRiparian(raina) -> Unwise(raina)\nforall x (Shrubby(x) -> Unwise(x))\n\nRocklike(raina)\n\nRiparian(raina) and Riparian(raina) -> Unwise(raina) -> therefore Unwise(raina) Riparian(raina) and Unwise(raina) and Riparian(raina) and Unwise(raina) -> Flagellate(raina) -> therefore Flagellate(raina) Riparian(raina) and Riparian(raina) -> Unwise(raina) -> therefore Unwise(raina) Flagellate(raina) and Unwise(raina) and forall x (Flagellate(x) and Unwise(x) -> Rocklike(x)) -> therefore Rocklike(raina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The leda is tempting. If the leda is welcoming then the leda is murmuring. Round, voiced things are welcoming. If the leda is tempting and the leda is voiced then the leda is murmuring. If the leda is bighearted and the leda is murmuring then the leda is tempting. If the leda is tempting then the leda is voiced. Young things are voiced. The leda is not welcoming.", "logic": "\nTempting(leda)\nWelcoming(leda) -> Murmuring(leda)\nforall x (Murmuring(x) and Voiced(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nTempting(leda) and Voiced(leda) -> Murmuring(leda)\nBighearted(leda) and Murmuring(leda) -> Tempting(leda)\nTempting(leda) -> Voiced(leda)\nforall x (Bighearted(x) -> Voiced(x))\n\nnot Welcoming(leda)\n\nTempting(leda) and Tempting(leda) -> Voiced(leda) -> therefore Voiced(leda) Tempting(leda) and Voiced(leda) and Tempting(leda) and Voiced(leda) -> Murmuring(leda) -> therefore Murmuring(leda) Tempting(leda) and Tempting(leda) -> Voiced(leda) -> therefore Voiced(leda) Murmuring(leda) and Voiced(leda) and forall x (Murmuring(x) and Voiced(x) -> Welcoming(x)) -> therefore Welcoming(leda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The sidney is uremic. If the sidney is patronised then the sidney is sigmoidal. Round, tannic things are patronised. If the sidney is uremic and the sidney is tannic then the sidney is sigmoidal. If the sidney is unpolished and the sidney is sigmoidal then the sidney is uremic. If the sidney is uremic then the sidney is tannic. Young things are tannic. The sidney is not unpolished.", "logic": "\nUremic(sidney)\nPatronised(sidney) -> Sigmoidal(sidney)\nforall x (Sigmoidal(x) and Tannic(x) -> Patronised(x))\nUremic(sidney) and Tannic(sidney) -> Sigmoidal(sidney)\nUnpolished(sidney) and Sigmoidal(sidney) -> Uremic(sidney)\nUremic(sidney) -> Tannic(sidney)\nforall x (Unpolished(x) -> Tannic(x))\n\nnot Unpolished(sidney)\n\nnot Unpolished(sidney) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The shela is peripheral. If the shela is abranchial then the shela is plumed. Round, portrayed things are abranchial. If the shela is peripheral and the shela is portrayed then the shela is plumed. If the shela is succulent and the shela is plumed then the shela is peripheral. If the shela is peripheral then the shela is portrayed. Young things are portrayed. The shela needs the shela.", "logic": "\nPeripheral(shela)\nAbranchial(shela) -> Plumed(shela)\nforall x (Plumed(x) and Portrayed(x) -> Abranchial(x))\nPeripheral(shela) and Portrayed(shela) -> Plumed(shela)\nSucculent(shela) and Plumed(shela) -> Peripheral(shela)\nPeripheral(shela) -> Portrayed(shela)\nforall x (Succulent(x) -> Portrayed(x))\n\nNeeds(shela, shela)\n\nNeeds(shela, shela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The natale is fabricated. If the natale is potbellied then the natale is port. Round, mozartian things are potbellied. If the natale is fabricated and the natale is mozartian then the natale is port. If the natale is sparkling and the natale is port then the natale is fabricated. If the natale is fabricated then the natale is mozartian. Young things are mozartian. The natale does not eat the natale.", "logic": "\nFabricated(natale)\nPotbellied(natale) -> Port(natale)\nforall x (Port(x) and Mozartian(x) -> Potbellied(x))\nFabricated(natale) and Mozartian(natale) -> Port(natale)\nSparkling(natale) and Port(natale) -> Fabricated(natale)\nFabricated(natale) -> Mozartian(natale)\nforall x (Sparkling(x) -> Mozartian(x))\n\nnot Eats(natale, natale)\n\nnot Eats(natale, natale) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "The robbert is untutored. If the robbert is turned then the robbert is ignescent. Round, mere things are turned. If the robbert is untutored and the robbert is mere then the robbert is ignescent. If the robbert is agelong and the robbert is ignescent then the robbert is untutored. If the robbert is untutored then the robbert is mere. Young things are mere. The robbert visits the robbert.", "logic": "\nUntutored(robbert)\nTurned(robbert) -> Ignescent(robbert)\nforall x (Ignescent(x) and Mere(x) -> Turned(x))\nUntutored(robbert) and Mere(robbert) -> Ignescent(robbert)\nAgelong(robbert) and Ignescent(robbert) -> Untutored(robbert)\nUntutored(robbert) -> Mere(robbert)\nforall x (Agelong(x) -> Mere(x))\n\nVisits(robbert, robbert)\n\nVisits(robbert, robbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-332"} {"premises": "Prissie is working. Apollo is subjugable. Debbra is engrossing. If something is down and roiling then it is engrossing. Smart things are down. If something is roiling then it is colonic. Blue things are working. If Debbra is engrossing then Debbra is roiling. All subjugable things are colonic. Debbra is engrossing.", "logic": "\nWorking(prissie)\nSubjugable(apollo)\nEngrossing(debbra)\nforall x (Down(x) and Roiling(x) -> Engrossing(x))\nforall x (Colonic(x) -> Down(x))\nforall x (Roiling(x) -> Colonic(x))\nforall x (Subjugable(x) -> Working(x))\nEngrossing(debbra) -> Roiling(debbra)\nforall x (Subjugable(x) -> Colonic(x))\n\nEngrossing(debbra)\n\ntherefore Engrossing(debbra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Hally is covalent. Halie is assured. Lorilyn is fighting. If something is jeweled and pierced then it is fighting. Smart things are jeweled. If something is pierced then it is dioecious. Blue things are covalent. If Lorilyn is fighting then Lorilyn is pierced. All assured things are dioecious. Hally is not covalent.", "logic": "\nCovalent(hally)\nAssured(halie)\nFighting(lorilyn)\nforall x (Jeweled(x) and Pierced(x) -> Fighting(x))\nforall x (Dioecious(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Pierced(x) -> Dioecious(x))\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Covalent(x))\nFighting(lorilyn) -> Pierced(lorilyn)\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Dioecious(x))\n\nnot Covalent(hally)\n\ntherefore Covalent(hally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Viviene is gallican. Gill is aweless. Hakim is centesimal. If something is voluble and arboresque then it is centesimal. Smart things are voluble. If something is arboresque then it is qualified. Blue things are gallican. If Hakim is centesimal then Hakim is arboresque. All aweless things are qualified. Hakim is arboresque.", "logic": "\nGallican(viviene)\nAweless(gill)\nCentesimal(hakim)\nforall x (Voluble(x) and Arboresque(x) -> Centesimal(x))\nforall x (Qualified(x) -> Voluble(x))\nforall x (Arboresque(x) -> Qualified(x))\nforall x (Aweless(x) -> Gallican(x))\nCentesimal(hakim) -> Arboresque(hakim)\nforall x (Aweless(x) -> Qualified(x))\n\nArboresque(hakim)\n\nCentesimal(hakim) and Centesimal(hakim) -> Arboresque(hakim) -> therefore Arboresque(hakim)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Babita is eradicable. Beilul is slanted. Giorgi is yearlong. If something is internal and convoluted then it is yearlong. Smart things are internal. If something is convoluted then it is nonplussed. Blue things are eradicable. If Giorgi is yearlong then Giorgi is convoluted. All slanted things are nonplussed. Beilul is not eradicable.", "logic": "\nEradicable(babita)\nSlanted(beilul)\nYearlong(giorgi)\nforall x (Internal(x) and Convoluted(x) -> Yearlong(x))\nforall x (Nonplussed(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Convoluted(x) -> Nonplussed(x))\nforall x (Slanted(x) -> Eradicable(x))\nYearlong(giorgi) -> Convoluted(giorgi)\nforall x (Slanted(x) -> Nonplussed(x))\n\nnot Eradicable(beilul)\n\nSlanted(beilul) and forall x (Slanted(x) -> Eradicable(x)) -> therefore Eradicable(beilul)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Jan is trackable. Kari is childish. Whitaker is goddam. If something is dateable and sticky then it is goddam. Smart things are dateable. If something is sticky then it is vesical. Blue things are trackable. If Whitaker is goddam then Whitaker is sticky. All childish things are vesical. Whitaker is vesical.", "logic": "\nTrackable(jan)\nChildish(kari)\nGoddam(whitaker)\nforall x (Dateable(x) and Sticky(x) -> Goddam(x))\nforall x (Vesical(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Sticky(x) -> Vesical(x))\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Trackable(x))\nGoddam(whitaker) -> Sticky(whitaker)\nforall x (Childish(x) -> Vesical(x))\n\nVesical(whitaker)\n\nGoddam(whitaker) and Goddam(whitaker) -> Sticky(whitaker) -> therefore Sticky(whitaker) Sticky(whitaker) and forall x (Sticky(x) -> Vesical(x)) -> therefore Vesical(whitaker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Camel is antisocial. Colin is skinless. Gideon is debonnaire. If something is impressed and vasiform then it is debonnaire. Smart things are impressed. If something is vasiform then it is garlicky. Blue things are antisocial. If Gideon is debonnaire then Gideon is vasiform. All skinless things are garlicky. Gideon is not garlicky.", "logic": "\nAntisocial(camel)\nSkinless(colin)\nDebonnaire(gideon)\nforall x (Impressed(x) and Vasiform(x) -> Debonnaire(x))\nforall x (Garlicky(x) -> Impressed(x))\nforall x (Vasiform(x) -> Garlicky(x))\nforall x (Skinless(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nDebonnaire(gideon) -> Vasiform(gideon)\nforall x (Skinless(x) -> Garlicky(x))\n\nnot Garlicky(gideon)\n\nDebonnaire(gideon) and Debonnaire(gideon) -> Vasiform(gideon) -> therefore Vasiform(gideon) Vasiform(gideon) and forall x (Vasiform(x) -> Garlicky(x)) -> therefore Garlicky(gideon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Zorina is overmodest. Karolina is declarable. Efram is crispate. If something is topping and fogyish then it is crispate. Smart things are topping. If something is fogyish then it is iraki. Blue things are overmodest. If Efram is crispate then Efram is fogyish. All declarable things are iraki. Efram is topping.", "logic": "\nOvermodest(zorina)\nDeclarable(karolina)\nCrispate(efram)\nforall x (Topping(x) and Fogyish(x) -> Crispate(x))\nforall x (Iraki(x) -> Topping(x))\nforall x (Fogyish(x) -> Iraki(x))\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Overmodest(x))\nCrispate(efram) -> Fogyish(efram)\nforall x (Declarable(x) -> Iraki(x))\n\nTopping(efram)\n\nCrispate(efram) and Crispate(efram) -> Fogyish(efram) -> therefore Fogyish(efram) Fogyish(efram) and forall x (Fogyish(x) -> Iraki(x)) -> therefore Iraki(efram) Iraki(efram) and forall x (Iraki(x) -> Topping(x)) -> therefore Topping(efram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Hilbert is uveal. Saul is motherlike. Fayth is smoldering. If something is binomial and redemptive then it is smoldering. Smart things are binomial. If something is redemptive then it is tactful. Blue things are uveal. If Fayth is smoldering then Fayth is redemptive. All motherlike things are tactful. Fayth is not binomial.", "logic": "\nUveal(hilbert)\nMotherlike(saul)\nSmoldering(fayth)\nforall x (Binomial(x) and Redemptive(x) -> Smoldering(x))\nforall x (Tactful(x) -> Binomial(x))\nforall x (Redemptive(x) -> Tactful(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Uveal(x))\nSmoldering(fayth) -> Redemptive(fayth)\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Tactful(x))\n\nnot Binomial(fayth)\n\nSmoldering(fayth) and Smoldering(fayth) -> Redemptive(fayth) -> therefore Redemptive(fayth) Redemptive(fayth) and forall x (Redemptive(x) -> Tactful(x)) -> therefore Tactful(fayth) Tactful(fayth) and forall x (Tactful(x) -> Binomial(x)) -> therefore Binomial(fayth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Janenna is tangerine. Jennie is treacly. Pacifica is gauche. If something is geological and occluded then it is gauche. Smart things are geological. If something is occluded then it is buttony. Blue things are tangerine. If Pacifica is gauche then Pacifica is occluded. All treacly things are buttony. Pacifica is not tangerine.", "logic": "\nTangerine(janenna)\nTreacly(jennie)\nGauche(pacifica)\nforall x (Geological(x) and Occluded(x) -> Gauche(x))\nforall x (Buttony(x) -> Geological(x))\nforall x (Occluded(x) -> Buttony(x))\nforall x (Treacly(x) -> Tangerine(x))\nGauche(pacifica) -> Occluded(pacifica)\nforall x (Treacly(x) -> Buttony(x))\n\nnot Tangerine(pacifica)\n\nforall x (Treacly(x) -> Tangerine(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Wallache is murine. Madelena is apheretic. Ardelia is eroded. If something is bridgeable and trifling then it is eroded. Smart things are bridgeable. If something is trifling then it is tippy. Blue things are murine. If Ardelia is eroded then Ardelia is trifling. All apheretic things are tippy. Wallache is eroded.", "logic": "\nMurine(wallache)\nApheretic(madelena)\nEroded(ardelia)\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and Trifling(x) -> Eroded(x))\nforall x (Tippy(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Trifling(x) -> Tippy(x))\nforall x (Apheretic(x) -> Murine(x))\nEroded(ardelia) -> Trifling(ardelia)\nforall x (Apheretic(x) -> Tippy(x))\n\nEroded(wallache)\n\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and Trifling(x) -> Eroded(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Ruthe is archaistic. Fabrice is speedy. Kanya is playful. If something is homoecious and sulphuric then it is playful. Smart things are homoecious. If something is sulphuric then it is stinting. Blue things are archaistic. If Kanya is playful then Kanya is sulphuric. All speedy things are stinting. Ruthe is not homoecious.", "logic": "\nArchaistic(ruthe)\nSpeedy(fabrice)\nPlayful(kanya)\nforall x (Homoecious(x) and Sulphuric(x) -> Playful(x))\nforall x (Stinting(x) -> Homoecious(x))\nforall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Stinting(x))\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Archaistic(x))\nPlayful(kanya) -> Sulphuric(kanya)\nforall x (Speedy(x) -> Stinting(x))\n\nnot Homoecious(ruthe)\n\nforall x (Stinting(x) -> Homoecious(x)) <- forall x (Sulphuric(x) -> Stinting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Cristine is viii. Fran is spumy. Jeannine is terminated. If something is westside and ruthful then it is terminated. Smart things are westside. If something is ruthful then it is veteran. Blue things are viii. If Jeannine is terminated then Jeannine is ruthful. All spumy things are veteran. Fran is terminated.", "logic": "\nViii(cristine)\nSpumy(fran)\nTerminated(jeannine)\nforall x (Westside(x) and Ruthful(x) -> Terminated(x))\nforall x (Veteran(x) -> Westside(x))\nforall x (Ruthful(x) -> Veteran(x))\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> Viii(x))\nTerminated(jeannine) -> Ruthful(jeannine)\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> Veteran(x))\n\nTerminated(fran)\n\nforall x (Westside(x) and Ruthful(x) -> Terminated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Enoch is alveolar. Rebecka is micropylar. Ichabod is electronic. If something is unswerving and emasculate then it is electronic. Smart things are unswerving. If something is emasculate then it is highbrow. Blue things are alveolar. If Ichabod is electronic then Ichabod is emasculate. All micropylar things are highbrow. Enoch is not white.", "logic": "\nAlveolar(enoch)\nMicropylar(rebecka)\nElectronic(ichabod)\nforall x (Unswerving(x) and Emasculate(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Highbrow(x) -> Unswerving(x))\nforall x (Emasculate(x) -> Highbrow(x))\nforall x (Micropylar(x) -> Alveolar(x))\nElectronic(ichabod) -> Emasculate(ichabod)\nforall x (Micropylar(x) -> Highbrow(x))\n\nnot White(enoch)\n\nnot White(enoch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Webb is canescent. Ivor is fearsome. Cobb is unlocated. If something is crank and innermost then it is unlocated. Smart things are crank. If something is innermost then it is sickly. Blue things are canescent. If Cobb is unlocated then Cobb is innermost. All fearsome things are sickly. Webb is fearsome.", "logic": "\nCanescent(webb)\nFearsome(ivor)\nUnlocated(cobb)\nforall x (Crank(x) and Innermost(x) -> Unlocated(x))\nforall x (Sickly(x) -> Crank(x))\nforall x (Innermost(x) -> Sickly(x))\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Canescent(x))\nUnlocated(cobb) -> Innermost(cobb)\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Sickly(x))\n\nFearsome(webb)\n\nFearsome(webb) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Sarene is ambiguous. Deborah is extraneous. Sharl is coastwise. If something is falconine and necrotic then it is coastwise. Smart things are falconine. If something is necrotic then it is frankish. Blue things are ambiguous. If Sharl is coastwise then Sharl is necrotic. All extraneous things are frankish. Deborah is not necrotic.", "logic": "\nAmbiguous(sarene)\nExtraneous(deborah)\nCoastwise(sharl)\nforall x (Falconine(x) and Necrotic(x) -> Coastwise(x))\nforall x (Frankish(x) -> Falconine(x))\nforall x (Necrotic(x) -> Frankish(x))\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Ambiguous(x))\nCoastwise(sharl) -> Necrotic(sharl)\nforall x (Extraneous(x) -> Frankish(x))\n\nnot Necrotic(deborah)\n\nnot Necrotic(deborah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Jaimie is reticent. Ilise is mammoth. Godart is stateless. If something is statant and icebound then it is stateless. Smart things are statant. If something is icebound then it is collinear. Blue things are reticent. If Godart is stateless then Godart is icebound. All mammoth things are collinear. Godart is white.", "logic": "\nReticent(jaimie)\nMammoth(ilise)\nStateless(godart)\nforall x (Statant(x) and Icebound(x) -> Stateless(x))\nforall x (Collinear(x) -> Statant(x))\nforall x (Icebound(x) -> Collinear(x))\nforall x (Mammoth(x) -> Reticent(x))\nStateless(godart) -> Icebound(godart)\nforall x (Mammoth(x) -> Collinear(x))\n\nWhite(godart)\n\nWhite(godart) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-479"} {"premises": "Tiebold is dreamy. Tiebold is lacrimal. Tiebold is motherly. Tiebold is biennial. Tiebold is ectopic. Tiebold is lively. Tiebold is unuttered. If Tiebold is lively and Tiebold is motherly then Tiebold is biennial. Rough, motherly things are biennial. If something is biennial then it is motherly. Green, unuttered things are lively. All motherly, lacrimal things are ectopic. All ectopic, lacrimal things are unuttered. All lively, ectopic things are biennial. All motherly, biennial things are dreamy. Tiebold is ectopic.", "logic": "\nDreamy(tiebold)\nLacrimal(tiebold)\nMotherly(tiebold)\nBiennial(tiebold)\nEctopic(tiebold)\nLively(tiebold)\nUnuttered(tiebold)\nLively(tiebold) and Motherly(tiebold) -> Biennial(tiebold)\nforall x (Ectopic(x) and Motherly(x) -> Biennial(x))\nforall x (Biennial(x) -> Motherly(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) and Unuttered(x) -> Lively(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) and Lacrimal(x) -> Ectopic(x))\nforall x (Ectopic(x) and Lacrimal(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Lively(x) and Ectopic(x) -> Biennial(x))\nforall x (Motherly(x) and Biennial(x) -> Dreamy(x))\n\nEctopic(tiebold)\n\ntherefore Ectopic(tiebold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-711"} {"premises": "Cariotta is calumnious. Cariotta is chorionic. Cariotta is manageable. Cariotta is resistible. Cariotta is craven. Cariotta is actinoid. Cariotta is critical. If Cariotta is actinoid and Cariotta is manageable then Cariotta is resistible. Rough, manageable things are resistible. If something is resistible then it is manageable. Green, critical things are actinoid. All manageable, chorionic things are craven. All craven, chorionic things are critical. All actinoid, craven things are resistible. All manageable, resistible things are calumnious. Cariotta is not actinoid.", "logic": "\nCalumnious(cariotta)\nChorionic(cariotta)\nManageable(cariotta)\nResistible(cariotta)\nCraven(cariotta)\nActinoid(cariotta)\nCritical(cariotta)\nActinoid(cariotta) and Manageable(cariotta) -> Resistible(cariotta)\nforall x (Craven(x) and Manageable(x) -> Resistible(x))\nforall x (Resistible(x) -> Manageable(x))\nforall x (Manageable(x) and Critical(x) -> Actinoid(x))\nforall x (Manageable(x) and Chorionic(x) -> Craven(x))\nforall x (Craven(x) and Chorionic(x) -> Critical(x))\nforall x (Actinoid(x) and Craven(x) -> Resistible(x))\nforall x (Manageable(x) and Resistible(x) -> Calumnious(x))\n\nnot Actinoid(cariotta)\n\ntherefore Actinoid(cariotta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-711"} {"premises": "The shauna is steadfast. The shauna is philippine. The shauna twinkle the erl. The shauna gasconade the erl. The shauna gasconade the whittaker. The erl lave the shauna. The erl lave the whittaker. The erl gasconade the whittaker. The whittaker lave the shauna. The whittaker lave the erl. The whittaker is steadfast. The whittaker gasconade the shauna. If something is ungallant then it gasconade the erl. If something gasconade the erl and it is philippine then it lave the whittaker. If something twinkle the whittaker then the whittaker is steadfast. If something lave the shauna and it twinkle the shauna then the shauna is philippine. If something lave the erl and the erl lave the whittaker then the whittaker is steadfast. If something gasconade the erl and it lave the erl then the erl twinkle the shauna. If something lave the whittaker then the whittaker lave the shauna. If the shauna gasconade the whittaker and the whittaker is quantized then the shauna twinkle the erl. The shauna gasconade the erl.", "logic": "\nSteadfast(shauna)\nPhilippine(shauna)\nTwinkle(shauna, erl)\nGasconade(shauna, erl)\nGasconade(shauna, whittaker)\nLave(erl, shauna)\nLave(erl, whittaker)\nGasconade(erl, whittaker)\nLave(whittaker, shauna)\nLave(whittaker, erl)\nSteadfast(whittaker)\nGasconade(whittaker, shauna)\nforall x (Ungallant(x) -> Gasconade(x, erl))\nforall x (Gasconade(x, erl) and Philippine(x) -> Lave(x, whittaker))\nforall x (Twinkle(x, whittaker) -> Steadfast(whittaker))\nforall x (Lave(x, shauna) and Twinkle(x, shauna) -> Philippine(shauna))\nforall x (Lave(x, erl) and Lave(erl, whittaker) -> Steadfast(whittaker))\nforall x (Gasconade(x, erl) and Lave(x, erl) -> Twinkle(erl, shauna))\nforall x (Lave(x, whittaker) -> Lave(whittaker, shauna))\nGasconade(shauna, whittaker) and Quantized(whittaker) -> Twinkle(shauna, erl)\n\nGasconade(shauna, erl)\n\ntherefore Gasconade(shauna, erl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2936"} {"premises": "The daisy is tart. The daisy is leadless. The daisy shudder the nicki. The daisy warble the nicki. The daisy warble the casie. The nicki overstay the daisy. The nicki overstay the casie. The nicki warble the casie. The casie overstay the daisy. The casie overstay the nicki. The casie is tart. The casie warble the daisy. If something is graphic then it warble the nicki. If something warble the nicki and it is leadless then it overstay the casie. If something shudder the casie then the casie is tart. If something overstay the daisy and it shudder the daisy then the daisy is leadless. If something overstay the nicki and the nicki overstay the casie then the casie is tart. If something warble the nicki and it overstay the nicki then the nicki shudder the daisy. If something overstay the casie then the casie overstay the daisy. If the daisy warble the casie and the casie is anginose then the daisy shudder the nicki. The daisy does not see the casie.", "logic": "\nTart(daisy)\nLeadless(daisy)\nShudder(daisy, nicki)\nWarble(daisy, nicki)\nWarble(daisy, casie)\nOverstay(nicki, daisy)\nOverstay(nicki, casie)\nWarble(nicki, casie)\nOverstay(casie, daisy)\nOverstay(casie, nicki)\nTart(casie)\nWarble(casie, daisy)\nforall x (Graphic(x) -> Warble(x, nicki))\nforall x (Warble(x, nicki) and Leadless(x) -> Overstay(x, casie))\nforall x (Shudder(x, casie) -> Tart(casie))\nforall x (Overstay(x, daisy) and Shudder(x, daisy) -> Leadless(daisy))\nforall x (Overstay(x, nicki) and Overstay(nicki, casie) -> Tart(casie))\nforall x (Warble(x, nicki) and Overstay(x, nicki) -> Shudder(nicki, daisy))\nforall x (Overstay(x, casie) -> Overstay(casie, daisy))\nWarble(daisy, casie) and Anginose(casie) -> Shudder(daisy, nicki)\n\nnot Warble(daisy, casie)\n\ntherefore Warble(daisy, casie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2936"} {"premises": "The cleo is stalwart. The cleo is yankee. The cleo narcotize the johnny. The cleo bogey the johnny. The cleo bogey the fabrianne. The johnny submarine the cleo. The johnny submarine the fabrianne. The johnny bogey the fabrianne. The fabrianne submarine the cleo. The fabrianne submarine the johnny. The fabrianne is stalwart. The fabrianne bogey the cleo. If something is winding then it bogey the johnny. If something bogey the johnny and it is yankee then it submarine the fabrianne. If something narcotize the fabrianne then the fabrianne is stalwart. If something submarine the cleo and it narcotize the cleo then the cleo is yankee. If something submarine the johnny and the johnny submarine the fabrianne then the fabrianne is stalwart. If something bogey the johnny and it submarine the johnny then the johnny narcotize the cleo. If something submarine the fabrianne then the fabrianne submarine the cleo. If the cleo bogey the fabrianne and the fabrianne is tegular then the cleo narcotize the johnny. The johnny does not like the cleo.", "logic": "\nStalwart(cleo)\nYankee(cleo)\nNarcotize(cleo, johnny)\nBogey(cleo, johnny)\nBogey(cleo, fabrianne)\nSubmarine(johnny, cleo)\nSubmarine(johnny, fabrianne)\nBogey(johnny, fabrianne)\nSubmarine(fabrianne, cleo)\nSubmarine(fabrianne, johnny)\nStalwart(fabrianne)\nBogey(fabrianne, cleo)\nforall x (Winding(x) -> Bogey(x, johnny))\nforall x (Bogey(x, johnny) and Yankee(x) -> Submarine(x, fabrianne))\nforall x (Narcotize(x, fabrianne) -> Stalwart(fabrianne))\nforall x (Submarine(x, cleo) and Narcotize(x, cleo) -> Yankee(cleo))\nforall x (Submarine(x, johnny) and Submarine(johnny, fabrianne) -> Stalwart(fabrianne))\nforall x (Bogey(x, johnny) and Submarine(x, johnny) -> Narcotize(johnny, cleo))\nforall x (Submarine(x, fabrianne) -> Submarine(fabrianne, cleo))\nBogey(cleo, fabrianne) and Tegular(fabrianne) -> Narcotize(cleo, johnny)\n\nnot Narcotize(johnny, cleo)\n\nforall x (Bogey(x, johnny) and Submarine(x, johnny) -> Narcotize(johnny, cleo)) <- forall x (Winding(x) -> Bogey(x, johnny)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2936"} {"premises": "The graehme is umteenth. The graehme is pubertal. The graehme spondaise the maxie. The graehme despair the maxie. The graehme despair the vinod. The maxie void the graehme. The maxie void the vinod. The maxie despair the vinod. The vinod void the graehme. The vinod void the maxie. The vinod is umteenth. The vinod despair the graehme. If something is pinnatifid then it despair the maxie. If something despair the maxie and it is pubertal then it void the vinod. If something spondaise the vinod then the vinod is umteenth. If something void the graehme and it spondaise the graehme then the graehme is pubertal. If something void the maxie and the maxie void the vinod then the vinod is umteenth. If something despair the maxie and it void the maxie then the maxie spondaise the graehme. If something void the vinod then the vinod void the graehme. If the graehme despair the vinod and the vinod is songful then the graehme spondaise the maxie. The vinod spondaise the vinod.", "logic": "\nUmteenth(graehme)\nPubertal(graehme)\nSpondaise(graehme, maxie)\nDespair(graehme, maxie)\nDespair(graehme, vinod)\nVoid(maxie, graehme)\nVoid(maxie, vinod)\nDespair(maxie, vinod)\nVoid(vinod, graehme)\nVoid(vinod, maxie)\nUmteenth(vinod)\nDespair(vinod, graehme)\nforall x (Pinnatifid(x) -> Despair(x, maxie))\nforall x (Despair(x, maxie) and Pubertal(x) -> Void(x, vinod))\nforall x (Spondaise(x, vinod) -> Umteenth(vinod))\nforall x (Void(x, graehme) and Spondaise(x, graehme) -> Pubertal(graehme))\nforall x (Void(x, maxie) and Void(maxie, vinod) -> Umteenth(vinod))\nforall x (Despair(x, maxie) and Void(x, maxie) -> Spondaise(maxie, graehme))\nforall x (Void(x, vinod) -> Void(vinod, graehme))\nDespair(graehme, vinod) and Songful(vinod) -> Spondaise(graehme, maxie)\n\nSpondaise(vinod, vinod)\n\nSpondaise(vinod, vinod) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2936"} {"premises": "Fawne is sunbaked. Fawne is glorious. Fawne is darkening. Claudette is sunbaked. Claudette is myelic. Claudette is darkening. Claudette is imposed. Collins is punitory. Collins is glorious. Collins is imposed. Green things are glorious. All glorious, runproof things are sunbaked. If something is sunbaked then it is glorious. Claudette is myelic.", "logic": "\nSunbaked(fawne)\nGlorious(fawne)\nDarkening(fawne)\nSunbaked(claudette)\nMyelic(claudette)\nDarkening(claudette)\nImposed(claudette)\nPunitory(collins)\nGlorious(collins)\nImposed(collins)\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Glorious(x))\nforall x (Glorious(x) and Runproof(x) -> Sunbaked(x))\nforall x (Sunbaked(x) -> Glorious(x))\n\nMyelic(claudette)\n\ntherefore Myelic(claudette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1861"} {"premises": "Marj is playful. Marj is creative. Marj is ghastly. Seana is playful. Seana is veteran. Seana is ghastly. Seana is suboceanic. Hamnet is piscine. Hamnet is creative. Hamnet is suboceanic. Green things are creative. All creative, taurine things are playful. If something is playful then it is creative. Hamnet is not creative.", "logic": "\nPlayful(marj)\nCreative(marj)\nGhastly(marj)\nPlayful(seana)\nVeteran(seana)\nGhastly(seana)\nSuboceanic(seana)\nPiscine(hamnet)\nCreative(hamnet)\nSuboceanic(hamnet)\nforall x (Playful(x) -> Creative(x))\nforall x (Creative(x) and Taurine(x) -> Playful(x))\nforall x (Playful(x) -> Creative(x))\n\nnot Creative(hamnet)\n\ntherefore Creative(hamnet)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1861"} {"premises": "Loria is dianoetic. Loria is homocercal. Loria is seedy. Theressa is dianoetic. Theressa is divinatory. Theressa is seedy. Theressa is obligated. Sherie is superfine. Sherie is homocercal. Sherie is obligated. Green things are homocercal. All homocercal, noted things are dianoetic. If something is dianoetic then it is homocercal. Sherie is not dianoetic.", "logic": "\nDianoetic(loria)\nHomocercal(loria)\nSeedy(loria)\nDianoetic(theressa)\nDivinatory(theressa)\nSeedy(theressa)\nObligated(theressa)\nSuperfine(sherie)\nHomocercal(sherie)\nObligated(sherie)\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) -> Homocercal(x))\nforall x (Homocercal(x) and Noted(x) -> Dianoetic(x))\nforall x (Dianoetic(x) -> Homocercal(x))\n\nnot Dianoetic(sherie)\n\nforall x (Homocercal(x) and Noted(x) -> Dianoetic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1861"} {"premises": "Dmitri is painful. Dmitri is certain. Dmitri is moribund. Enya is painful. Enya is fiberoptic. Enya is moribund. Enya is nisi. Armstrong is awned. Armstrong is certain. Armstrong is nisi. Green things are certain. All certain, binominal things are painful. If something is painful then it is certain. Armstrong is fiberoptic.", "logic": "\nPainful(dmitri)\nCertain(dmitri)\nMoribund(dmitri)\nPainful(enya)\nFiberoptic(enya)\nMoribund(enya)\nNisi(enya)\nAwned(armstrong)\nCertain(armstrong)\nNisi(armstrong)\nforall x (Painful(x) -> Certain(x))\nforall x (Certain(x) and Binominal(x) -> Painful(x))\nforall x (Painful(x) -> Certain(x))\n\nFiberoptic(armstrong)\n\nFiberoptic(armstrong) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1861"} {"premises": "Sturgis is prenominal. Sturgis is marsupial. Sturgis is unequalled. Sturgis is strident. Sturgis is procedural. Matthias is not prenominal. Matthias is not rascally. Matthias is marsupial. Matthias is unequalled. Matthias is strident. Aveline is prenominal. Aveline is strident. Aveline is procedural. Margy is rascally. Margy is strident. If Margy is marsupial then Margy is not rascally. All descending people are procedural. If someone is prenominal and not strident then they are procedural. Blue people are prenominal. Smart, procedural people are descending. If someone is prenominal then they are descending. If someone is marsupial and rascally then they are not descending. If Aveline is descending and Aveline is not marsupial then Aveline is not rascally. Sturgis is strident.", "logic": "\nPrenominal(sturgis)\nMarsupial(sturgis)\nUnequalled(sturgis)\nStrident(sturgis)\nProcedural(sturgis)\nnot Prenominal(matthias)\nnot Rascally(matthias)\nMarsupial(matthias)\nUnequalled(matthias)\nStrident(matthias)\nPrenominal(aveline)\nStrident(aveline)\nProcedural(aveline)\nRascally(margy)\nStrident(margy)\nMarsupial(margy) -> not Rascally(margy)\nforall x (Descending(x) -> Procedural(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) and not Strident(x) -> Procedural(x))\nforall x (Rascally(x) -> Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) and Procedural(x) -> Descending(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Descending(x))\nforall x (Marsupial(x) and Rascally(x) -> not Descending(x))\nDescending(aveline) and not Marsupial(aveline) -> not Rascally(aveline)\n\nStrident(sturgis)\n\ntherefore Strident(sturgis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Patrik is skanky. Patrik is tricky. Patrik is favorable. Patrik is empyreal. Patrik is incorrect. Dianna is not skanky. Dianna is not eupneic. Dianna is tricky. Dianna is favorable. Dianna is empyreal. Alida is skanky. Alida is empyreal. Alida is incorrect. Karly is eupneic. Karly is empyreal. If Karly is tricky then Karly is not eupneic. All septicemic people are incorrect. If someone is skanky and not empyreal then they are incorrect. Blue people are skanky. Smart, incorrect people are septicemic. If someone is skanky then they are septicemic. If someone is tricky and eupneic then they are not septicemic. If Alida is septicemic and Alida is not tricky then Alida is not eupneic. Patrik is not tricky.", "logic": "\nSkanky(patrik)\nTricky(patrik)\nFavorable(patrik)\nEmpyreal(patrik)\nIncorrect(patrik)\nnot Skanky(dianna)\nnot Eupneic(dianna)\nTricky(dianna)\nFavorable(dianna)\nEmpyreal(dianna)\nSkanky(alida)\nEmpyreal(alida)\nIncorrect(alida)\nEupneic(karly)\nEmpyreal(karly)\nTricky(karly) -> not Eupneic(karly)\nforall x (Septicemic(x) -> Incorrect(x))\nforall x (Skanky(x) and not Empyreal(x) -> Incorrect(x))\nforall x (Eupneic(x) -> Skanky(x))\nforall x (Empyreal(x) and Incorrect(x) -> Septicemic(x))\nforall x (Skanky(x) -> Septicemic(x))\nforall x (Tricky(x) and Eupneic(x) -> not Septicemic(x))\nSepticemic(alida) and not Tricky(alida) -> not Eupneic(alida)\n\nnot Tricky(patrik)\n\ntherefore Tricky(patrik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Bobbie is incumbent. Bobbie is venezuelan. Bobbie is dowered. Bobbie is astigmatic. Bobbie is epidemic. Winni is not incumbent. Winni is not gruff. Winni is venezuelan. Winni is dowered. Winni is astigmatic. Inessa is incumbent. Inessa is astigmatic. Inessa is epidemic. Ricki is gruff. Ricki is astigmatic. If Ricki is venezuelan then Ricki is not gruff. All past people are epidemic. If someone is incumbent and not astigmatic then they are epidemic. Blue people are incumbent. Smart, epidemic people are past. If someone is incumbent then they are past. If someone is venezuelan and gruff then they are not past. If Inessa is past and Inessa is not venezuelan then Inessa is not gruff. Bobbie is past.", "logic": "\nIncumbent(bobbie)\nVenezuelan(bobbie)\nDowered(bobbie)\nAstigmatic(bobbie)\nEpidemic(bobbie)\nnot Incumbent(winni)\nnot Gruff(winni)\nVenezuelan(winni)\nDowered(winni)\nAstigmatic(winni)\nIncumbent(inessa)\nAstigmatic(inessa)\nEpidemic(inessa)\nGruff(ricki)\nAstigmatic(ricki)\nVenezuelan(ricki) -> not Gruff(ricki)\nforall x (Past(x) -> Epidemic(x))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) and not Astigmatic(x) -> Epidemic(x))\nforall x (Gruff(x) -> Incumbent(x))\nforall x (Astigmatic(x) and Epidemic(x) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Incumbent(x) -> Past(x))\nforall x (Venezuelan(x) and Gruff(x) -> not Past(x))\nPast(inessa) and not Venezuelan(inessa) -> not Gruff(inessa)\n\nPast(bobbie)\n\nIncumbent(bobbie) and forall x (Incumbent(x) -> Past(x)) -> therefore Past(bobbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Kali is clownish. Kali is immaculate. Kali is gloved. Kali is denatured. Kali is cormose. Evita is not clownish. Evita is not ulnar. Evita is immaculate. Evita is gloved. Evita is denatured. Alford is clownish. Alford is denatured. Alford is cormose. Rosabelle is ulnar. Rosabelle is denatured. If Rosabelle is immaculate then Rosabelle is not ulnar. All cloying people are cormose. If someone is clownish and not denatured then they are cormose. Blue people are clownish. Smart, cormose people are cloying. If someone is clownish then they are cloying. If someone is immaculate and ulnar then they are not cloying. If Alford is cloying and Alford is not immaculate then Alford is not ulnar. Rosabelle is not clownish.", "logic": "\nClownish(kali)\nImmaculate(kali)\nGloved(kali)\nDenatured(kali)\nCormose(kali)\nnot Clownish(evita)\nnot Ulnar(evita)\nImmaculate(evita)\nGloved(evita)\nDenatured(evita)\nClownish(alford)\nDenatured(alford)\nCormose(alford)\nUlnar(rosabelle)\nDenatured(rosabelle)\nImmaculate(rosabelle) -> not Ulnar(rosabelle)\nforall x (Cloying(x) -> Cormose(x))\nforall x (Clownish(x) and not Denatured(x) -> Cormose(x))\nforall x (Ulnar(x) -> Clownish(x))\nforall x (Denatured(x) and Cormose(x) -> Cloying(x))\nforall x (Clownish(x) -> Cloying(x))\nforall x (Immaculate(x) and Ulnar(x) -> not Cloying(x))\nCloying(alford) and not Immaculate(alford) -> not Ulnar(alford)\n\nnot Clownish(rosabelle)\n\nUlnar(rosabelle) and forall x (Ulnar(x) -> Clownish(x)) -> therefore Clownish(rosabelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Margy is hagridden. Margy is numerous. Margy is ringleted. Margy is cleared. Margy is maltreated. Murdoch is not hagridden. Murdoch is not federal. Murdoch is numerous. Murdoch is ringleted. Murdoch is cleared. Noreen is hagridden. Noreen is cleared. Noreen is maltreated. Evonne is federal. Evonne is cleared. If Evonne is numerous then Evonne is not federal. All bigeminal people are maltreated. If someone is hagridden and not cleared then they are maltreated. Blue people are hagridden. Smart, maltreated people are bigeminal. If someone is hagridden then they are bigeminal. If someone is numerous and federal then they are not bigeminal. If Noreen is bigeminal and Noreen is not numerous then Noreen is not federal. Evonne is bigeminal.", "logic": "\nHagridden(margy)\nNumerous(margy)\nRingleted(margy)\nCleared(margy)\nMaltreated(margy)\nnot Hagridden(murdoch)\nnot Federal(murdoch)\nNumerous(murdoch)\nRingleted(murdoch)\nCleared(murdoch)\nHagridden(noreen)\nCleared(noreen)\nMaltreated(noreen)\nFederal(evonne)\nCleared(evonne)\nNumerous(evonne) -> not Federal(evonne)\nforall x (Bigeminal(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nforall x (Hagridden(x) and not Cleared(x) -> Maltreated(x))\nforall x (Federal(x) -> Hagridden(x))\nforall x (Cleared(x) and Maltreated(x) -> Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Hagridden(x) -> Bigeminal(x))\nforall x (Numerous(x) and Federal(x) -> not Bigeminal(x))\nBigeminal(noreen) and not Numerous(noreen) -> not Federal(noreen)\n\nBigeminal(evonne)\n\nFederal(evonne) and forall x (Federal(x) -> Hagridden(x)) -> therefore Hagridden(evonne) Hagridden(evonne) and forall x (Hagridden(x) -> Bigeminal(x)) -> therefore Bigeminal(evonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Feodora is unwise. Feodora is abient. Feodora is longtime. Feodora is starry. Feodora is northwest. Forbes is not unwise. Forbes is not soupy. Forbes is abient. Forbes is longtime. Forbes is starry. Madonna is unwise. Madonna is starry. Madonna is northwest. Husein is soupy. Husein is starry. If Husein is abient then Husein is not soupy. All cloudy people are northwest. If someone is unwise and not starry then they are northwest. Blue people are unwise. Smart, northwest people are cloudy. If someone is unwise then they are cloudy. If someone is abient and soupy then they are not cloudy. If Madonna is cloudy and Madonna is not abient then Madonna is not soupy. Husein is not cloudy.", "logic": "\nUnwise(feodora)\nAbient(feodora)\nLongtime(feodora)\nStarry(feodora)\nNorthwest(feodora)\nnot Unwise(forbes)\nnot Soupy(forbes)\nAbient(forbes)\nLongtime(forbes)\nStarry(forbes)\nUnwise(madonna)\nStarry(madonna)\nNorthwest(madonna)\nSoupy(husein)\nStarry(husein)\nAbient(husein) -> not Soupy(husein)\nforall x (Cloudy(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Unwise(x) and not Starry(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Soupy(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Starry(x) and Northwest(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Unwise(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Abient(x) and Soupy(x) -> not Cloudy(x))\nCloudy(madonna) and not Abient(madonna) -> not Soupy(madonna)\n\nnot Cloudy(husein)\n\nSoupy(husein) and forall x (Soupy(x) -> Unwise(x)) -> therefore Unwise(husein) Unwise(husein) and forall x (Unwise(x) -> Cloudy(x)) -> therefore Cloudy(husein)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Woodman is shagged. Woodman is stranded. Woodman is runny. Woodman is adverbial. Woodman is fireproof. Meggan is not shagged. Meggan is not jovian. Meggan is stranded. Meggan is runny. Meggan is adverbial. Worden is shagged. Worden is adverbial. Worden is fireproof. Isador is jovian. Isador is adverbial. If Isador is stranded then Isador is not jovian. All lenitive people are fireproof. If someone is shagged and not adverbial then they are fireproof. Blue people are shagged. Smart, fireproof people are lenitive. If someone is shagged then they are lenitive. If someone is stranded and jovian then they are not lenitive. If Worden is lenitive and Worden is not stranded then Worden is not jovian. Meggan is not fireproof.", "logic": "\nShagged(woodman)\nStranded(woodman)\nRunny(woodman)\nAdverbial(woodman)\nFireproof(woodman)\nnot Shagged(meggan)\nnot Jovian(meggan)\nStranded(meggan)\nRunny(meggan)\nAdverbial(meggan)\nShagged(worden)\nAdverbial(worden)\nFireproof(worden)\nJovian(isador)\nAdverbial(isador)\nStranded(isador) -> not Jovian(isador)\nforall x (Lenitive(x) -> Fireproof(x))\nforall x (Shagged(x) and not Adverbial(x) -> Fireproof(x))\nforall x (Jovian(x) -> Shagged(x))\nforall x (Adverbial(x) and Fireproof(x) -> Lenitive(x))\nforall x (Shagged(x) -> Lenitive(x))\nforall x (Stranded(x) and Jovian(x) -> not Lenitive(x))\nLenitive(worden) and not Stranded(worden) -> not Jovian(worden)\n\nnot Fireproof(meggan)\n\nforall x (Lenitive(x) -> Fireproof(x)) <- forall x (Adverbial(x) and Fireproof(x) -> Lenitive(x)) <- forall x (Shagged(x) and not Adverbial(x) -> Fireproof(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Davin is glabrous. Davin is greensick. Davin is approved. Davin is apivorous. Davin is cheering. Estel is not glabrous. Estel is not exilic. Estel is greensick. Estel is approved. Estel is apivorous. Taite is glabrous. Taite is apivorous. Taite is cheering. Kass is exilic. Kass is apivorous. If Kass is greensick then Kass is not exilic. All satiny people are cheering. If someone is glabrous and not apivorous then they are cheering. Blue people are glabrous. Smart, cheering people are satiny. If someone is glabrous then they are satiny. If someone is greensick and exilic then they are not satiny. If Taite is satiny and Taite is not greensick then Taite is not exilic. Estel is satiny.", "logic": "\nGlabrous(davin)\nGreensick(davin)\nApproved(davin)\nApivorous(davin)\nCheering(davin)\nnot Glabrous(estel)\nnot Exilic(estel)\nGreensick(estel)\nApproved(estel)\nApivorous(estel)\nGlabrous(taite)\nApivorous(taite)\nCheering(taite)\nExilic(kass)\nApivorous(kass)\nGreensick(kass) -> not Exilic(kass)\nforall x (Satiny(x) -> Cheering(x))\nforall x (Glabrous(x) and not Apivorous(x) -> Cheering(x))\nforall x (Exilic(x) -> Glabrous(x))\nforall x (Apivorous(x) and Cheering(x) -> Satiny(x))\nforall x (Glabrous(x) -> Satiny(x))\nforall x (Greensick(x) and Exilic(x) -> not Satiny(x))\nSatiny(taite) and not Greensick(taite) -> not Exilic(taite)\n\nSatiny(estel)\n\nforall x (Apivorous(x) and Cheering(x) -> Satiny(x)) <- forall x (Satiny(x) -> Cheering(x)) <- forall x (Glabrous(x) -> Satiny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Joanna is damascene. Joanna is mozartean. Joanna is otiose. Joanna is oviform. Joanna is carnal. Ardella is not damascene. Ardella is not dyspnoeal. Ardella is mozartean. Ardella is otiose. Ardella is oviform. Allsun is damascene. Allsun is oviform. Allsun is carnal. Tommy is dyspnoeal. Tommy is oviform. If Tommy is mozartean then Tommy is not dyspnoeal. All feminist people are carnal. If someone is damascene and not oviform then they are carnal. Blue people are damascene. Smart, carnal people are feminist. If someone is damascene then they are feminist. If someone is mozartean and dyspnoeal then they are not feminist. If Allsun is feminist and Allsun is not mozartean then Allsun is not dyspnoeal. Tommy is not mozartean.", "logic": "\nDamascene(joanna)\nMozartean(joanna)\nOtiose(joanna)\nOviform(joanna)\nCarnal(joanna)\nnot Damascene(ardella)\nnot Dyspnoeal(ardella)\nMozartean(ardella)\nOtiose(ardella)\nOviform(ardella)\nDamascene(allsun)\nOviform(allsun)\nCarnal(allsun)\nDyspnoeal(tommy)\nOviform(tommy)\nMozartean(tommy) -> not Dyspnoeal(tommy)\nforall x (Feminist(x) -> Carnal(x))\nforall x (Damascene(x) and not Oviform(x) -> Carnal(x))\nforall x (Dyspnoeal(x) -> Damascene(x))\nforall x (Oviform(x) and Carnal(x) -> Feminist(x))\nforall x (Damascene(x) -> Feminist(x))\nforall x (Mozartean(x) and Dyspnoeal(x) -> not Feminist(x))\nFeminist(allsun) and not Mozartean(allsun) -> not Dyspnoeal(allsun)\n\nnot Mozartean(tommy)\n\nnot Mozartean(tommy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Sheffield is poisonous. Sheffield is mindless. Sheffield is autarkical. Sheffield is redux. Sheffield is roofless. Ailyn is not poisonous. Ailyn is not eutherian. Ailyn is mindless. Ailyn is autarkical. Ailyn is redux. Emmet is poisonous. Emmet is redux. Emmet is roofless. Doralynn is eutherian. Doralynn is redux. If Doralynn is mindless then Doralynn is not eutherian. All gormless people are roofless. If someone is poisonous and not redux then they are roofless. Blue people are poisonous. Smart, roofless people are gormless. If someone is poisonous then they are gormless. If someone is mindless and eutherian then they are not gormless. If Emmet is gormless and Emmet is not mindless then Emmet is not eutherian. Emmet is autarkical.", "logic": "\nPoisonous(sheffield)\nMindless(sheffield)\nAutarkical(sheffield)\nRedux(sheffield)\nRoofless(sheffield)\nnot Poisonous(ailyn)\nnot Eutherian(ailyn)\nMindless(ailyn)\nAutarkical(ailyn)\nRedux(ailyn)\nPoisonous(emmet)\nRedux(emmet)\nRoofless(emmet)\nEutherian(doralynn)\nRedux(doralynn)\nMindless(doralynn) -> not Eutherian(doralynn)\nforall x (Gormless(x) -> Roofless(x))\nforall x (Poisonous(x) and not Redux(x) -> Roofless(x))\nforall x (Eutherian(x) -> Poisonous(x))\nforall x (Redux(x) and Roofless(x) -> Gormless(x))\nforall x (Poisonous(x) -> Gormless(x))\nforall x (Mindless(x) and Eutherian(x) -> not Gormless(x))\nGormless(emmet) and not Mindless(emmet) -> not Eutherian(emmet)\n\nAutarkical(emmet)\n\nAutarkical(emmet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Ethelred is sexist. Ethelred is snuffly. Ethelred is foliate. Ethelred is turned. Ethelred is lilac. Cherie is not sexist. Cherie is not sulphurous. Cherie is snuffly. Cherie is foliate. Cherie is turned. Hildagard is sexist. Hildagard is turned. Hildagard is lilac. Karmen is sulphurous. Karmen is turned. If Karmen is snuffly then Karmen is not sulphurous. All inspiring people are lilac. If someone is sexist and not turned then they are lilac. Blue people are sexist. Smart, lilac people are inspiring. If someone is sexist then they are inspiring. If someone is snuffly and sulphurous then they are not inspiring. If Hildagard is inspiring and Hildagard is not snuffly then Hildagard is not sulphurous. Hildagard is not sulphurous.", "logic": "\nSexist(ethelred)\nSnuffly(ethelred)\nFoliate(ethelred)\nTurned(ethelred)\nLilac(ethelred)\nnot Sexist(cherie)\nnot Sulphurous(cherie)\nSnuffly(cherie)\nFoliate(cherie)\nTurned(cherie)\nSexist(hildagard)\nTurned(hildagard)\nLilac(hildagard)\nSulphurous(karmen)\nTurned(karmen)\nSnuffly(karmen) -> not Sulphurous(karmen)\nforall x (Inspiring(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Sexist(x) and not Turned(x) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Sulphurous(x) -> Sexist(x))\nforall x (Turned(x) and Lilac(x) -> Inspiring(x))\nforall x (Sexist(x) -> Inspiring(x))\nforall x (Snuffly(x) and Sulphurous(x) -> not Inspiring(x))\nInspiring(hildagard) and not Snuffly(hildagard) -> not Sulphurous(hildagard)\n\nnot Sulphurous(hildagard)\n\nnot Sulphurous(hildagard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Kathlene is laniary. Kathlene is semiliquid. Kathlene is dated. Kathlene is brinded. Kathlene is bellying. Orson is not laniary. Orson is not breakable. Orson is semiliquid. Orson is dated. Orson is brinded. Jephthah is laniary. Jephthah is brinded. Jephthah is bellying. Uriah is breakable. Uriah is brinded. If Uriah is semiliquid then Uriah is not breakable. All realised people are bellying. If someone is laniary and not brinded then they are bellying. Blue people are laniary. Smart, bellying people are realised. If someone is laniary then they are realised. If someone is semiliquid and breakable then they are not realised. If Jephthah is realised and Jephthah is not semiliquid then Jephthah is not breakable. Jephthah is semiliquid.", "logic": "\nLaniary(kathlene)\nSemiliquid(kathlene)\nDated(kathlene)\nBrinded(kathlene)\nBellying(kathlene)\nnot Laniary(orson)\nnot Breakable(orson)\nSemiliquid(orson)\nDated(orson)\nBrinded(orson)\nLaniary(jephthah)\nBrinded(jephthah)\nBellying(jephthah)\nBreakable(uriah)\nBrinded(uriah)\nSemiliquid(uriah) -> not Breakable(uriah)\nforall x (Realised(x) -> Bellying(x))\nforall x (Laniary(x) and not Brinded(x) -> Bellying(x))\nforall x (Breakable(x) -> Laniary(x))\nforall x (Brinded(x) and Bellying(x) -> Realised(x))\nforall x (Laniary(x) -> Realised(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Breakable(x) -> not Realised(x))\nRealised(jephthah) and not Semiliquid(jephthah) -> not Breakable(jephthah)\n\nSemiliquid(jephthah)\n\nSemiliquid(jephthah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D2-1588"} {"premises": "Mendie is purposive. Mendie is uneatable. Mendie is overmodest. Mendie is falsetto. Grant is not pictural. Grant is purposive. Grant is sniffy. Grant is not skittish. Grant is overmodest. Marcio is not purposive. Marcio is skittish. Marcio is falsetto. Armond is purposive. Armond is uneatable. Armond is overmodest. All sniffy people are falsetto. If someone is sniffy then they are overmodest. Marcio is not purposive.", "logic": "\nPurposive(mendie)\nUneatable(mendie)\nOvermodest(mendie)\nFalsetto(mendie)\nnot Pictural(grant)\nPurposive(grant)\nSniffy(grant)\nnot Skittish(grant)\nOvermodest(grant)\nnot Purposive(marcio)\nSkittish(marcio)\nFalsetto(marcio)\nPurposive(armond)\nUneatable(armond)\nOvermodest(armond)\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Falsetto(x))\nforall x (Sniffy(x) -> Overmodest(x))\n\nnot Purposive(marcio)\n\ntherefore not Purposive(marcio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Evangelin is lusitanian. Evangelin is tight. Evangelin is accusative. Evangelin is greedy. Olenka is not ungallant. Olenka is lusitanian. Olenka is minty. Olenka is not cubical. Olenka is accusative. Thatch is not lusitanian. Thatch is cubical. Thatch is greedy. Lynsey is lusitanian. Lynsey is tight. Lynsey is accusative. All minty people are greedy. If someone is minty then they are accusative. Olenka is ungallant.", "logic": "\nLusitanian(evangelin)\nTight(evangelin)\nAccusative(evangelin)\nGreedy(evangelin)\nnot Ungallant(olenka)\nLusitanian(olenka)\nMinty(olenka)\nnot Cubical(olenka)\nAccusative(olenka)\nnot Lusitanian(thatch)\nCubical(thatch)\nGreedy(thatch)\nLusitanian(lynsey)\nTight(lynsey)\nAccusative(lynsey)\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Greedy(x))\nforall x (Minty(x) -> Accusative(x))\n\nUngallant(olenka)\n\ntherefore not Ungallant(olenka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Doll is hunched. Doll is frantic. Doll is outsized. Doll is cheating. Tedman is not obstructed. Tedman is hunched. Tedman is spacey. Tedman is not focal. Tedman is outsized. Jocelyn is not hunched. Jocelyn is focal. Jocelyn is cheating. Christen is hunched. Christen is frantic. Christen is outsized. All spacey people are cheating. If someone is spacey then they are outsized. Tedman is cheating.", "logic": "\nHunched(doll)\nFrantic(doll)\nOutsized(doll)\nCheating(doll)\nnot Obstructed(tedman)\nHunched(tedman)\nSpacey(tedman)\nnot Focal(tedman)\nOutsized(tedman)\nnot Hunched(jocelyn)\nFocal(jocelyn)\nCheating(jocelyn)\nHunched(christen)\nFrantic(christen)\nOutsized(christen)\nforall x (Spacey(x) -> Cheating(x))\nforall x (Spacey(x) -> Outsized(x))\n\nCheating(tedman)\n\nSpacey(tedman) and forall x (Spacey(x) -> Cheating(x)) -> therefore Cheating(tedman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Rafaela is perinatal. Rafaela is caesarean. Rafaela is redemptory. Rafaela is blocked. Timmy is not unsown. Timmy is perinatal. Timmy is vulpine. Timmy is not worrying. Timmy is redemptory. Myrta is not perinatal. Myrta is worrying. Myrta is blocked. Chaddy is perinatal. Chaddy is caesarean. Chaddy is redemptory. All vulpine people are blocked. If someone is vulpine then they are redemptory. Timmy is not blocked.", "logic": "\nPerinatal(rafaela)\nCaesarean(rafaela)\nRedemptory(rafaela)\nBlocked(rafaela)\nnot Unsown(timmy)\nPerinatal(timmy)\nVulpine(timmy)\nnot Worrying(timmy)\nRedemptory(timmy)\nnot Perinatal(myrta)\nWorrying(myrta)\nBlocked(myrta)\nPerinatal(chaddy)\nCaesarean(chaddy)\nRedemptory(chaddy)\nforall x (Vulpine(x) -> Blocked(x))\nforall x (Vulpine(x) -> Redemptory(x))\n\nnot Blocked(timmy)\n\nVulpine(timmy) and forall x (Vulpine(x) -> Blocked(x)) -> therefore Blocked(timmy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Kathlene is token. Kathlene is washable. Kathlene is epicurean. Kathlene is actinic. Wilson is not cissy. Wilson is token. Wilson is glamourous. Wilson is not unfeminine. Wilson is epicurean. Eda is not token. Eda is unfeminine. Eda is actinic. Noland is token. Noland is washable. Noland is epicurean. All glamourous people are actinic. If someone is glamourous then they are epicurean. Eda is not epicurean.", "logic": "\nToken(kathlene)\nWashable(kathlene)\nEpicurean(kathlene)\nActinic(kathlene)\nnot Cissy(wilson)\nToken(wilson)\nGlamourous(wilson)\nnot Unfeminine(wilson)\nEpicurean(wilson)\nnot Token(eda)\nUnfeminine(eda)\nActinic(eda)\nToken(noland)\nWashable(noland)\nEpicurean(noland)\nforall x (Glamourous(x) -> Actinic(x))\nforall x (Glamourous(x) -> Epicurean(x))\n\nnot Epicurean(eda)\n\nforall x (Glamourous(x) -> Epicurean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Ardene is umbellate. Ardene is variant. Ardene is mutual. Ardene is isolating. Michell is not emended. Michell is umbellate. Michell is misguided. Michell is not wondering. Michell is mutual. Oliy is not umbellate. Oliy is wondering. Oliy is isolating. Roy is umbellate. Roy is variant. Roy is mutual. All misguided people are isolating. If someone is misguided then they are mutual. Roy is isolating.", "logic": "\nUmbellate(ardene)\nVariant(ardene)\nMutual(ardene)\nIsolating(ardene)\nnot Emended(michell)\nUmbellate(michell)\nMisguided(michell)\nnot Wondering(michell)\nMutual(michell)\nnot Umbellate(oliy)\nWondering(oliy)\nIsolating(oliy)\nUmbellate(roy)\nVariant(roy)\nMutual(roy)\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Isolating(x))\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Mutual(x))\n\nIsolating(roy)\n\nforall x (Misguided(x) -> Isolating(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Rosario is meagre. Rosario is prolate. Rosario is shakedown. Rosario is thorny. Kaari is not unbanded. Kaari is meagre. Kaari is spurting. Kaari is not jovial. Kaari is shakedown. Shep is not meagre. Shep is jovial. Shep is thorny. Patrizia is meagre. Patrizia is prolate. Patrizia is shakedown. All spurting people are thorny. If someone is spurting then they are shakedown. Kaari is not prolate.", "logic": "\nMeagre(rosario)\nProlate(rosario)\nShakedown(rosario)\nThorny(rosario)\nnot Unbanded(kaari)\nMeagre(kaari)\nSpurting(kaari)\nnot Jovial(kaari)\nShakedown(kaari)\nnot Meagre(shep)\nJovial(shep)\nThorny(shep)\nMeagre(patrizia)\nProlate(patrizia)\nShakedown(patrizia)\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Thorny(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Shakedown(x))\n\nnot Prolate(kaari)\n\nnot Prolate(kaari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Ram is equestrian. Ram is fortunate. Ram is rural. Ram is acidic. Natala is not acold. Natala is equestrian. Natala is devoid. Natala is not gristly. Natala is rural. Milli is not equestrian. Milli is gristly. Milli is acidic. Annamaria is equestrian. Annamaria is fortunate. Annamaria is rural. All devoid people are acidic. If someone is devoid then they are rural. Milli is devoid.", "logic": "\nEquestrian(ram)\nFortunate(ram)\nRural(ram)\nAcidic(ram)\nnot Acold(natala)\nEquestrian(natala)\nDevoid(natala)\nnot Gristly(natala)\nRural(natala)\nnot Equestrian(milli)\nGristly(milli)\nAcidic(milli)\nEquestrian(annamaria)\nFortunate(annamaria)\nRural(annamaria)\nforall x (Devoid(x) -> Acidic(x))\nforall x (Devoid(x) -> Rural(x))\n\nDevoid(milli)\n\nDevoid(milli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2229"} {"premises": "Jefferey is serpentine. Jefferey is glycogenic. Jefferey is pouched. Jefferey is needy. Jefferey is rhymed. Jefferey is upmarket. Jefferey is impressive. White things are upmarket. If Jefferey is upmarket and Jefferey is glycogenic then Jefferey is needy. Blue, rhymed things are impressive. If Jefferey is upmarket and Jefferey is rhymed then Jefferey is impressive. All impressive, glycogenic things are upmarket. If something is glycogenic and serpentine then it is pouched. Jefferey is upmarket.", "logic": "\nSerpentine(jefferey)\nGlycogenic(jefferey)\nPouched(jefferey)\nNeedy(jefferey)\nRhymed(jefferey)\nUpmarket(jefferey)\nImpressive(jefferey)\nforall x (Impressive(x) -> Upmarket(x))\nUpmarket(jefferey) and Glycogenic(jefferey) -> Needy(jefferey)\nforall x (Serpentine(x) and Rhymed(x) -> Impressive(x))\nUpmarket(jefferey) and Rhymed(jefferey) -> Impressive(jefferey)\nforall x (Impressive(x) and Glycogenic(x) -> Upmarket(x))\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) and Serpentine(x) -> Pouched(x))\n\nUpmarket(jefferey)\n\ntherefore Upmarket(jefferey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5909"} {"premises": "Kerri is estimable. Kerri is whopping. Kerri is lachrymal. Kerri is epochal. Kerri is nigerien. Kerri is burdenless. Kerri is archaic. White things are burdenless. If Kerri is burdenless and Kerri is whopping then Kerri is epochal. Blue, nigerien things are archaic. If Kerri is burdenless and Kerri is nigerien then Kerri is archaic. All archaic, whopping things are burdenless. If something is whopping and estimable then it is lachrymal. Kerri is not archaic.", "logic": "\nEstimable(kerri)\nWhopping(kerri)\nLachrymal(kerri)\nEpochal(kerri)\nNigerien(kerri)\nBurdenless(kerri)\nArchaic(kerri)\nforall x (Archaic(x) -> Burdenless(x))\nBurdenless(kerri) and Whopping(kerri) -> Epochal(kerri)\nforall x (Estimable(x) and Nigerien(x) -> Archaic(x))\nBurdenless(kerri) and Nigerien(kerri) -> Archaic(kerri)\nforall x (Archaic(x) and Whopping(x) -> Burdenless(x))\nforall x (Whopping(x) and Estimable(x) -> Lachrymal(x))\n\nnot Archaic(kerri)\n\ntherefore Archaic(kerri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5909"} {"premises": "Nilson is filled. Nilson is fidgety. Nilson is parched. Nilson is ablaze. Nilson is cauline. Nilson is ornery. Nilson is catalatic. If Nilson is cauline then Nilson is parched. Blue people are parched. Nilson is ablaze.", "logic": "\nFilled(nilson)\nFidgety(nilson)\nParched(nilson)\nAblaze(nilson)\nCauline(nilson)\nOrnery(nilson)\nCatalatic(nilson)\nCauline(nilson) -> Parched(nilson)\nforall x (Filled(x) -> Parched(x))\n\nAblaze(nilson)\n\ntherefore Ablaze(nilson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2870"} {"premises": "Meier is nihilistic. Meier is mysophobic. Meier is ectodermic. Meier is cliched. Meier is dysplastic. Meier is taloned. Meier is tellurian. If Meier is dysplastic then Meier is ectodermic. Blue people are ectodermic. Meier is not ectodermic.", "logic": "\nNihilistic(meier)\nMysophobic(meier)\nEctodermic(meier)\nCliched(meier)\nDysplastic(meier)\nTaloned(meier)\nTellurian(meier)\nDysplastic(meier) -> Ectodermic(meier)\nforall x (Nihilistic(x) -> Ectodermic(x))\n\nnot Ectodermic(meier)\n\ntherefore Ectodermic(meier)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2870"} {"premises": "The coralie butter the len. The coralie is ahorse. The coralie sportscast the iggy. The len butter the olva. The len sportscast the coralie. The iggy butter the len. The iggy butter the olva. The iggy is lettered. The iggy sportscast the coralie. The iggy anoint the olva. The olva butter the iggy. The olva sportscast the len. The olva sportscast the iggy. The olva anoint the len. The olva anoint the iggy. If someone is ahorse then they see the iggy. If someone anoint the iggy then they need the olva. If the len sportscast the olva and the len anoint the iggy then the len is twee. The olva anoint the len.", "logic": "\nButter(coralie, len)\nAhorse(coralie)\nSportscast(coralie, iggy)\nButter(len, olva)\nSportscast(len, coralie)\nButter(iggy, len)\nButter(iggy, olva)\nLettered(iggy)\nSportscast(iggy, coralie)\nAnoint(iggy, olva)\nButter(olva, iggy)\nSportscast(olva, len)\nSportscast(olva, iggy)\nAnoint(olva, len)\nAnoint(olva, iggy)\nforall x (Ahorse(x) -> Anoint(x, iggy))\nforall x (Anoint(x, iggy) -> Sportscast(x, olva))\nSportscast(len, olva) and Anoint(len, iggy) -> Twee(len)\n\nAnoint(olva, len)\n\ntherefore Anoint(olva, len)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The kenneth skin the emilia. The kenneth is monodical. The kenneth confer the herman. The emilia skin the rosario. The emilia confer the kenneth. The herman skin the emilia. The herman skin the rosario. The herman is tyrolean. The herman confer the kenneth. The herman skateboard the rosario. The rosario skin the herman. The rosario confer the emilia. The rosario confer the herman. The rosario skateboard the emilia. The rosario skateboard the herman. If someone is monodical then they see the herman. If someone skateboard the herman then they need the rosario. If the emilia confer the rosario and the emilia skateboard the herman then the emilia is scanty. The rosario does not need the herman.", "logic": "\nSkin(kenneth, emilia)\nMonodical(kenneth)\nConfer(kenneth, herman)\nSkin(emilia, rosario)\nConfer(emilia, kenneth)\nSkin(herman, emilia)\nSkin(herman, rosario)\nTyrolean(herman)\nConfer(herman, kenneth)\nSkateboard(herman, rosario)\nSkin(rosario, herman)\nConfer(rosario, emilia)\nConfer(rosario, herman)\nSkateboard(rosario, emilia)\nSkateboard(rosario, herman)\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> Skateboard(x, herman))\nforall x (Skateboard(x, herman) -> Confer(x, rosario))\nConfer(emilia, rosario) and Skateboard(emilia, herman) -> Scanty(emilia)\n\nnot Confer(rosario, herman)\n\ntherefore Confer(rosario, herman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The omar hamstring the viki. The omar is adorable. The omar prelude the jeni. The viki hamstring the armstrong. The viki prelude the omar. The jeni hamstring the viki. The jeni hamstring the armstrong. The jeni is forfeit. The jeni prelude the omar. The jeni salaam the armstrong. The armstrong hamstring the jeni. The armstrong prelude the viki. The armstrong prelude the jeni. The armstrong salaam the viki. The armstrong salaam the jeni. If someone is adorable then they see the jeni. If someone salaam the jeni then they need the armstrong. If the viki prelude the armstrong and the viki salaam the jeni then the viki is threadbare. The omar salaam the jeni.", "logic": "\nHamstring(omar, viki)\nAdorable(omar)\nPrelude(omar, jeni)\nHamstring(viki, armstrong)\nPrelude(viki, omar)\nHamstring(jeni, viki)\nHamstring(jeni, armstrong)\nForfeit(jeni)\nPrelude(jeni, omar)\nSalaam(jeni, armstrong)\nHamstring(armstrong, jeni)\nPrelude(armstrong, viki)\nPrelude(armstrong, jeni)\nSalaam(armstrong, viki)\nSalaam(armstrong, jeni)\nforall x (Adorable(x) -> Salaam(x, jeni))\nforall x (Salaam(x, jeni) -> Prelude(x, armstrong))\nPrelude(viki, armstrong) and Salaam(viki, jeni) -> Threadbare(viki)\n\nSalaam(omar, jeni)\n\nAdorable(omar) and forall x (Adorable(x) -> Salaam(x, jeni)) -> therefore Salaam(omar, jeni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The orsola despoil the aubry. The orsola is archean. The orsola decry the celestia. The aubry despoil the inez. The aubry decry the orsola. The celestia despoil the aubry. The celestia despoil the inez. The celestia is amorphous. The celestia decry the orsola. The celestia recruit the inez. The inez despoil the celestia. The inez decry the aubry. The inez decry the celestia. The inez recruit the aubry. The inez recruit the celestia. If someone is archean then they see the celestia. If someone recruit the celestia then they need the inez. If the aubry decry the inez and the aubry recruit the celestia then the aubry is iterative. The inez does not need the inez.", "logic": "\nDespoil(orsola, aubry)\nArchean(orsola)\nDecry(orsola, celestia)\nDespoil(aubry, inez)\nDecry(aubry, orsola)\nDespoil(celestia, aubry)\nDespoil(celestia, inez)\nAmorphous(celestia)\nDecry(celestia, orsola)\nRecruit(celestia, inez)\nDespoil(inez, celestia)\nDecry(inez, aubry)\nDecry(inez, celestia)\nRecruit(inez, aubry)\nRecruit(inez, celestia)\nforall x (Archean(x) -> Recruit(x, celestia))\nforall x (Recruit(x, celestia) -> Decry(x, inez))\nDecry(aubry, inez) and Recruit(aubry, celestia) -> Iterative(aubry)\n\nnot Decry(inez, inez)\n\nRecruit(inez, celestia) and forall x (Recruit(x, celestia) -> Decry(x, inez)) -> therefore Decry(inez, inez)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The violette rumor the dan. The violette is ranging. The violette intimidate the selma. The dan rumor the anthea. The dan intimidate the violette. The selma rumor the dan. The selma rumor the anthea. The selma is vinaceous. The selma intimidate the violette. The selma cantillate the anthea. The anthea rumor the selma. The anthea intimidate the dan. The anthea intimidate the selma. The anthea cantillate the dan. The anthea cantillate the selma. If someone is ranging then they see the selma. If someone cantillate the selma then they need the anthea. If the dan intimidate the anthea and the dan cantillate the selma then the dan is heavenly. The violette intimidate the anthea.", "logic": "\nRumor(violette, dan)\nRanging(violette)\nIntimidate(violette, selma)\nRumor(dan, anthea)\nIntimidate(dan, violette)\nRumor(selma, dan)\nRumor(selma, anthea)\nVinaceous(selma)\nIntimidate(selma, violette)\nCantillate(selma, anthea)\nRumor(anthea, selma)\nIntimidate(anthea, dan)\nIntimidate(anthea, selma)\nCantillate(anthea, dan)\nCantillate(anthea, selma)\nforall x (Ranging(x) -> Cantillate(x, selma))\nforall x (Cantillate(x, selma) -> Intimidate(x, anthea))\nIntimidate(dan, anthea) and Cantillate(dan, selma) -> Heavenly(dan)\n\nIntimidate(violette, anthea)\n\nRanging(violette) and forall x (Ranging(x) -> Cantillate(x, selma)) -> therefore Cantillate(violette, selma) Cantillate(violette, selma) and forall x (Cantillate(x, selma) -> Intimidate(x, anthea)) -> therefore Intimidate(violette, anthea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The jenette synthesise the anais. The jenette is hypethral. The jenette heat the janela. The anais synthesise the kingsly. The anais heat the jenette. The janela synthesise the anais. The janela synthesise the kingsly. The janela is illusional. The janela heat the jenette. The janela bull the kingsly. The kingsly synthesise the janela. The kingsly heat the anais. The kingsly heat the janela. The kingsly bull the anais. The kingsly bull the janela. If someone is hypethral then they see the janela. If someone bull the janela then they need the kingsly. If the anais heat the kingsly and the anais bull the janela then the anais is indisposed. The jenette does not need the kingsly.", "logic": "\nSynthesise(jenette, anais)\nHypethral(jenette)\nHeat(jenette, janela)\nSynthesise(anais, kingsly)\nHeat(anais, jenette)\nSynthesise(janela, anais)\nSynthesise(janela, kingsly)\nIllusional(janela)\nHeat(janela, jenette)\nBull(janela, kingsly)\nSynthesise(kingsly, janela)\nHeat(kingsly, anais)\nHeat(kingsly, janela)\nBull(kingsly, anais)\nBull(kingsly, janela)\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> Bull(x, janela))\nforall x (Bull(x, janela) -> Heat(x, kingsly))\nHeat(anais, kingsly) and Bull(anais, janela) -> Indisposed(anais)\n\nnot Heat(jenette, kingsly)\n\nHypethral(jenette) and forall x (Hypethral(x) -> Bull(x, janela)) -> therefore Bull(jenette, janela) Bull(jenette, janela) and forall x (Bull(x, janela) -> Heat(x, kingsly)) -> therefore Heat(jenette, kingsly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The asia recess the lani. The asia is requested. The asia inhere the madona. The lani recess the emmye. The lani inhere the asia. The madona recess the lani. The madona recess the emmye. The madona is zigzag. The madona inhere the asia. The madona vituperate the emmye. The emmye recess the madona. The emmye inhere the lani. The emmye inhere the madona. The emmye vituperate the lani. The emmye vituperate the madona. If someone is requested then they see the madona. If someone vituperate the madona then they need the emmye. If the lani inhere the emmye and the lani vituperate the madona then the lani is volute. The lani is not volute.", "logic": "\nRecess(asia, lani)\nRequested(asia)\nInhere(asia, madona)\nRecess(lani, emmye)\nInhere(lani, asia)\nRecess(madona, lani)\nRecess(madona, emmye)\nZigzag(madona)\nInhere(madona, asia)\nVituperate(madona, emmye)\nRecess(emmye, madona)\nInhere(emmye, lani)\nInhere(emmye, madona)\nVituperate(emmye, lani)\nVituperate(emmye, madona)\nforall x (Requested(x) -> Vituperate(x, madona))\nforall x (Vituperate(x, madona) -> Inhere(x, emmye))\nInhere(lani, emmye) and Vituperate(lani, madona) -> Volute(lani)\n\nnot Volute(lani)\n\nInhere(lani, emmye) and Vituperate(lani, madona) -> Volute(lani) <- forall x (Requested(x) -> Vituperate(x, madona)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The nickie embrittle the consolata. The nickie is invasive. The nickie triumph the randie. The consolata embrittle the anais. The consolata triumph the nickie. The randie embrittle the consolata. The randie embrittle the anais. The randie is preferable. The randie triumph the nickie. The randie anathemize the anais. The anais embrittle the randie. The anais triumph the consolata. The anais triumph the randie. The anais anathemize the consolata. The anais anathemize the randie. If someone is invasive then they see the randie. If someone anathemize the randie then they need the anais. If the consolata triumph the anais and the consolata anathemize the randie then the consolata is scoured. The randie anathemize the randie.", "logic": "\nEmbrittle(nickie, consolata)\nInvasive(nickie)\nTriumph(nickie, randie)\nEmbrittle(consolata, anais)\nTriumph(consolata, nickie)\nEmbrittle(randie, consolata)\nEmbrittle(randie, anais)\nPreferable(randie)\nTriumph(randie, nickie)\nAnathemize(randie, anais)\nEmbrittle(anais, randie)\nTriumph(anais, consolata)\nTriumph(anais, randie)\nAnathemize(anais, consolata)\nAnathemize(anais, randie)\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Anathemize(x, randie))\nforall x (Anathemize(x, randie) -> Triumph(x, anais))\nTriumph(consolata, anais) and Anathemize(consolata, randie) -> Scoured(consolata)\n\nAnathemize(randie, randie)\n\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> Anathemize(x, randie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The gonzales eject the wren. The gonzales is plotted. The gonzales debone the tatiana. The wren eject the philomena. The wren debone the gonzales. The tatiana eject the wren. The tatiana eject the philomena. The tatiana is confirming. The tatiana debone the gonzales. The tatiana request the philomena. The philomena eject the tatiana. The philomena debone the wren. The philomena debone the tatiana. The philomena request the wren. The philomena request the tatiana. If someone is plotted then they see the tatiana. If someone request the tatiana then they need the philomena. If the wren debone the philomena and the wren request the tatiana then the wren is alopecic. The tatiana does not need the philomena.", "logic": "\nEject(gonzales, wren)\nPlotted(gonzales)\nDebone(gonzales, tatiana)\nEject(wren, philomena)\nDebone(wren, gonzales)\nEject(tatiana, wren)\nEject(tatiana, philomena)\nConfirming(tatiana)\nDebone(tatiana, gonzales)\nRequest(tatiana, philomena)\nEject(philomena, tatiana)\nDebone(philomena, wren)\nDebone(philomena, tatiana)\nRequest(philomena, wren)\nRequest(philomena, tatiana)\nforall x (Plotted(x) -> Request(x, tatiana))\nforall x (Request(x, tatiana) -> Debone(x, philomena))\nDebone(wren, philomena) and Request(wren, tatiana) -> Alopecic(wren)\n\nnot Debone(tatiana, philomena)\n\nforall x (Request(x, tatiana) -> Debone(x, philomena)) <- forall x (Plotted(x) -> Request(x, tatiana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The ronni benumb the zollie. The ronni is joyful. The ronni grubstake the emmalynne. The zollie benumb the denis. The zollie grubstake the ronni. The emmalynne benumb the zollie. The emmalynne benumb the denis. The emmalynne is disposable. The emmalynne grubstake the ronni. The emmalynne seine the denis. The denis benumb the emmalynne. The denis grubstake the zollie. The denis grubstake the emmalynne. The denis seine the zollie. The denis seine the emmalynne. If someone is joyful then they see the emmalynne. If someone seine the emmalynne then they need the denis. If the zollie grubstake the denis and the zollie seine the emmalynne then the zollie is perversive. The ronni grubstake the ronni.", "logic": "\nBenumb(ronni, zollie)\nJoyful(ronni)\nGrubstake(ronni, emmalynne)\nBenumb(zollie, denis)\nGrubstake(zollie, ronni)\nBenumb(emmalynne, zollie)\nBenumb(emmalynne, denis)\nDisposable(emmalynne)\nGrubstake(emmalynne, ronni)\nSeine(emmalynne, denis)\nBenumb(denis, emmalynne)\nGrubstake(denis, zollie)\nGrubstake(denis, emmalynne)\nSeine(denis, zollie)\nSeine(denis, emmalynne)\nforall x (Joyful(x) -> Seine(x, emmalynne))\nforall x (Seine(x, emmalynne) -> Grubstake(x, denis))\nGrubstake(zollie, denis) and Seine(zollie, emmalynne) -> Perversive(zollie)\n\nGrubstake(ronni, ronni)\n\nGrubstake(ronni, ronni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The wayne bayonet the cornelius. The wayne is guilty. The wayne prolong the jermaine. The cornelius bayonet the ethelyn. The cornelius prolong the wayne. The jermaine bayonet the cornelius. The jermaine bayonet the ethelyn. The jermaine is fossilized. The jermaine prolong the wayne. The jermaine deprave the ethelyn. The ethelyn bayonet the jermaine. The ethelyn prolong the cornelius. The ethelyn prolong the jermaine. The ethelyn deprave the cornelius. The ethelyn deprave the jermaine. If someone is guilty then they see the jermaine. If someone deprave the jermaine then they need the ethelyn. If the cornelius prolong the ethelyn and the cornelius deprave the jermaine then the cornelius is edentate. The wayne does not need the cornelius.", "logic": "\nBayonet(wayne, cornelius)\nGuilty(wayne)\nProlong(wayne, jermaine)\nBayonet(cornelius, ethelyn)\nProlong(cornelius, wayne)\nBayonet(jermaine, cornelius)\nBayonet(jermaine, ethelyn)\nFossilized(jermaine)\nProlong(jermaine, wayne)\nDeprave(jermaine, ethelyn)\nBayonet(ethelyn, jermaine)\nProlong(ethelyn, cornelius)\nProlong(ethelyn, jermaine)\nDeprave(ethelyn, cornelius)\nDeprave(ethelyn, jermaine)\nforall x (Guilty(x) -> Deprave(x, jermaine))\nforall x (Deprave(x, jermaine) -> Prolong(x, ethelyn))\nProlong(cornelius, ethelyn) and Deprave(cornelius, jermaine) -> Edentate(cornelius)\n\nnot Prolong(wayne, cornelius)\n\nnot Prolong(wayne, cornelius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "The humbert ramp the karole. The humbert is approved. The humbert butylate the clarisa. The karole ramp the nichols. The karole butylate the humbert. The clarisa ramp the karole. The clarisa ramp the nichols. The clarisa is vermillion. The clarisa butylate the humbert. The clarisa furlough the nichols. The nichols ramp the clarisa. The nichols butylate the karole. The nichols butylate the clarisa. The nichols furlough the karole. The nichols furlough the clarisa. If someone is approved then they see the clarisa. If someone furlough the clarisa then they need the nichols. If the karole butylate the nichols and the karole furlough the clarisa then the karole is sultry. The nichols is sultry.", "logic": "\nRamp(humbert, karole)\nApproved(humbert)\nButylate(humbert, clarisa)\nRamp(karole, nichols)\nButylate(karole, humbert)\nRamp(clarisa, karole)\nRamp(clarisa, nichols)\nVermillion(clarisa)\nButylate(clarisa, humbert)\nFurlough(clarisa, nichols)\nRamp(nichols, clarisa)\nButylate(nichols, karole)\nButylate(nichols, clarisa)\nFurlough(nichols, karole)\nFurlough(nichols, clarisa)\nforall x (Approved(x) -> Furlough(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Furlough(x, clarisa) -> Butylate(x, nichols))\nButylate(karole, nichols) and Furlough(karole, clarisa) -> Sultry(karole)\n\nSultry(nichols)\n\nSultry(nichols) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-513"} {"premises": "Gaspar is areal. Gaspar is sympatric. Gaspar is spatulate. Herculie is epistolary. Herculie is syllabic. Erda is areal. Erda is unusual. Erda is sympatric. Erda is potty. Erda is spatulate. If someone is syllabic then they are potty. Rough, spatulate people are sympatric. If someone is epistolary and spatulate then they are areal. White, potty people are epistolary. If someone is epistolary then they are sympatric. All potty people are spatulate. Herculie is syllabic.", "logic": "\nAreal(gaspar)\nSympatric(gaspar)\nSpatulate(gaspar)\nEpistolary(herculie)\nSyllabic(herculie)\nAreal(erda)\nUnusual(erda)\nSympatric(erda)\nPotty(erda)\nSpatulate(erda)\nforall x (Syllabic(x) -> Potty(x))\nforall x (Potty(x) and Spatulate(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Epistolary(x) and Spatulate(x) -> Areal(x))\nforall x (Spatulate(x) and Potty(x) -> Epistolary(x))\nforall x (Epistolary(x) -> Sympatric(x))\nforall x (Potty(x) -> Spatulate(x))\n\nSyllabic(herculie)\n\ntherefore Syllabic(herculie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Rutledge is acetic. Rutledge is shabby. Rutledge is lank. Suzanne is capsulated. Suzanne is napping. Jimmy is acetic. Jimmy is charged. Jimmy is shabby. Jimmy is sprigged. Jimmy is lank. If someone is napping then they are sprigged. Rough, lank people are shabby. If someone is capsulated and lank then they are acetic. White, sprigged people are capsulated. If someone is capsulated then they are shabby. All sprigged people are lank. Rutledge is not shabby.", "logic": "\nAcetic(rutledge)\nShabby(rutledge)\nLank(rutledge)\nCapsulated(suzanne)\nNapping(suzanne)\nAcetic(jimmy)\nCharged(jimmy)\nShabby(jimmy)\nSprigged(jimmy)\nLank(jimmy)\nforall x (Napping(x) -> Sprigged(x))\nforall x (Sprigged(x) and Lank(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Capsulated(x) and Lank(x) -> Acetic(x))\nforall x (Lank(x) and Sprigged(x) -> Capsulated(x))\nforall x (Capsulated(x) -> Shabby(x))\nforall x (Sprigged(x) -> Lank(x))\n\nnot Shabby(rutledge)\n\ntherefore Shabby(rutledge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Basil is fouled. Basil is tubed. Basil is undeterred. Giorgio is sessile. Giorgio is overfed. Danna is fouled. Danna is vast. Danna is tubed. Danna is vertebral. Danna is undeterred. If someone is overfed then they are vertebral. Rough, undeterred people are tubed. If someone is sessile and undeterred then they are fouled. White, vertebral people are sessile. If someone is sessile then they are tubed. All vertebral people are undeterred. Giorgio is vertebral.", "logic": "\nFouled(basil)\nTubed(basil)\nUndeterred(basil)\nSessile(giorgio)\nOverfed(giorgio)\nFouled(danna)\nVast(danna)\nTubed(danna)\nVertebral(danna)\nUndeterred(danna)\nforall x (Overfed(x) -> Vertebral(x))\nforall x (Vertebral(x) and Undeterred(x) -> Tubed(x))\nforall x (Sessile(x) and Undeterred(x) -> Fouled(x))\nforall x (Undeterred(x) and Vertebral(x) -> Sessile(x))\nforall x (Sessile(x) -> Tubed(x))\nforall x (Vertebral(x) -> Undeterred(x))\n\nVertebral(giorgio)\n\nOverfed(giorgio) and forall x (Overfed(x) -> Vertebral(x)) -> therefore Vertebral(giorgio)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Len is pregnant. Len is neglected. Len is hypnotic. Arlina is elect. Arlina is spiteful. Yetta is pregnant. Yetta is nitrous. Yetta is neglected. Yetta is fattening. Yetta is hypnotic. If someone is spiteful then they are fattening. Rough, hypnotic people are neglected. If someone is elect and hypnotic then they are pregnant. White, fattening people are elect. If someone is elect then they are neglected. All fattening people are hypnotic. Arlina is not fattening.", "logic": "\nPregnant(len)\nNeglected(len)\nHypnotic(len)\nElect(arlina)\nSpiteful(arlina)\nPregnant(yetta)\nNitrous(yetta)\nNeglected(yetta)\nFattening(yetta)\nHypnotic(yetta)\nforall x (Spiteful(x) -> Fattening(x))\nforall x (Fattening(x) and Hypnotic(x) -> Neglected(x))\nforall x (Elect(x) and Hypnotic(x) -> Pregnant(x))\nforall x (Hypnotic(x) and Fattening(x) -> Elect(x))\nforall x (Elect(x) -> Neglected(x))\nforall x (Fattening(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\n\nnot Fattening(arlina)\n\nSpiteful(arlina) and forall x (Spiteful(x) -> Fattening(x)) -> therefore Fattening(arlina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Clarey is pyrolytic. Clarey is ascetic. Clarey is untilled. Matias is catholic. Matias is nubbly. Tammara is pyrolytic. Tammara is future. Tammara is ascetic. Tammara is leguminous. Tammara is untilled. If someone is nubbly then they are leguminous. Rough, untilled people are ascetic. If someone is catholic and untilled then they are pyrolytic. White, leguminous people are catholic. If someone is catholic then they are ascetic. All leguminous people are untilled. Matias is untilled.", "logic": "\nPyrolytic(clarey)\nAscetic(clarey)\nUntilled(clarey)\nCatholic(matias)\nNubbly(matias)\nPyrolytic(tammara)\nFuture(tammara)\nAscetic(tammara)\nLeguminous(tammara)\nUntilled(tammara)\nforall x (Nubbly(x) -> Leguminous(x))\nforall x (Leguminous(x) and Untilled(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nforall x (Catholic(x) and Untilled(x) -> Pyrolytic(x))\nforall x (Untilled(x) and Leguminous(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Catholic(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nforall x (Leguminous(x) -> Untilled(x))\n\nUntilled(matias)\n\nNubbly(matias) and forall x (Nubbly(x) -> Leguminous(x)) -> therefore Leguminous(matias) Leguminous(matias) and forall x (Leguminous(x) -> Untilled(x)) -> therefore Untilled(matias)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Judie is infective. Judie is plastered. Judie is stitched. Christi is analgetic. Christi is astonished. Lev is infective. Lev is unploughed. Lev is plastered. Lev is thawed. Lev is stitched. If someone is astonished then they are thawed. Rough, stitched people are plastered. If someone is analgetic and stitched then they are infective. White, thawed people are analgetic. If someone is analgetic then they are plastered. All thawed people are stitched. Christi is not stitched.", "logic": "\nInfective(judie)\nPlastered(judie)\nStitched(judie)\nAnalgetic(christi)\nAstonished(christi)\nInfective(lev)\nUnploughed(lev)\nPlastered(lev)\nThawed(lev)\nStitched(lev)\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> Thawed(x))\nforall x (Thawed(x) and Stitched(x) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) and Stitched(x) -> Infective(x))\nforall x (Stitched(x) and Thawed(x) -> Analgetic(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Thawed(x) -> Stitched(x))\n\nnot Stitched(christi)\n\nAstonished(christi) and forall x (Astonished(x) -> Thawed(x)) -> therefore Thawed(christi) Thawed(christi) and forall x (Thawed(x) -> Stitched(x)) -> therefore Stitched(christi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Elysha is pinchbeck. Elysha is overpriced. Elysha is hypnotized. Eadith is masterless. Eadith is lengthened. Esmerelda is pinchbeck. Esmerelda is remarkable. Esmerelda is overpriced. Esmerelda is disgraced. Esmerelda is hypnotized. If someone is lengthened then they are disgraced. Rough, hypnotized people are overpriced. If someone is masterless and hypnotized then they are pinchbeck. White, disgraced people are masterless. If someone is masterless then they are overpriced. All disgraced people are hypnotized. Eadith is pinchbeck.", "logic": "\nPinchbeck(elysha)\nOverpriced(elysha)\nHypnotized(elysha)\nMasterless(eadith)\nLengthened(eadith)\nPinchbeck(esmerelda)\nRemarkable(esmerelda)\nOverpriced(esmerelda)\nDisgraced(esmerelda)\nHypnotized(esmerelda)\nforall x (Lengthened(x) -> Disgraced(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) and Hypnotized(x) -> Overpriced(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) and Hypnotized(x) -> Pinchbeck(x))\nforall x (Hypnotized(x) and Disgraced(x) -> Masterless(x))\nforall x (Masterless(x) -> Overpriced(x))\nforall x (Disgraced(x) -> Hypnotized(x))\n\nPinchbeck(eadith)\n\nLengthened(eadith) and forall x (Lengthened(x) -> Disgraced(x)) -> therefore Disgraced(eadith) Disgraced(eadith) and forall x (Disgraced(x) -> Hypnotized(x)) -> therefore Hypnotized(eadith) Masterless(eadith) and Hypnotized(eadith) and forall x (Masterless(x) and Hypnotized(x) -> Pinchbeck(x)) -> therefore Pinchbeck(eadith)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Haven is untilled. Haven is unmarried. Haven is untalented. Donia is benthal. Donia is succulent. Liora is untilled. Liora is qualified. Liora is unmarried. Liora is apocarpous. Liora is untalented. If someone is succulent then they are apocarpous. Rough, untalented people are unmarried. If someone is benthal and untalented then they are untilled. White, apocarpous people are benthal. If someone is benthal then they are unmarried. All apocarpous people are untalented. Donia is not untilled.", "logic": "\nUntilled(haven)\nUnmarried(haven)\nUntalented(haven)\nBenthal(donia)\nSucculent(donia)\nUntilled(liora)\nQualified(liora)\nUnmarried(liora)\nApocarpous(liora)\nUntalented(liora)\nforall x (Succulent(x) -> Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) and Untalented(x) -> Unmarried(x))\nforall x (Benthal(x) and Untalented(x) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Untalented(x) and Apocarpous(x) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Benthal(x) -> Unmarried(x))\nforall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Untalented(x))\n\nnot Untilled(donia)\n\nSucculent(donia) and forall x (Succulent(x) -> Apocarpous(x)) -> therefore Apocarpous(donia) Apocarpous(donia) and forall x (Apocarpous(x) -> Untalented(x)) -> therefore Untalented(donia) Benthal(donia) and Untalented(donia) and forall x (Benthal(x) and Untalented(x) -> Untilled(x)) -> therefore Untilled(donia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Gere is brushlike. Gere is alphabetic. Gere is mozambican. Grayce is kinky. Grayce is broadloom. Erhart is brushlike. Erhart is quondam. Erhart is alphabetic. Erhart is midwestern. Erhart is mozambican. If someone is broadloom then they are midwestern. Rough, mozambican people are alphabetic. If someone is kinky and mozambican then they are brushlike. White, midwestern people are kinky. If someone is kinky then they are alphabetic. All midwestern people are mozambican. Gere is not midwestern.", "logic": "\nBrushlike(gere)\nAlphabetic(gere)\nMozambican(gere)\nKinky(grayce)\nBroadloom(grayce)\nBrushlike(erhart)\nQuondam(erhart)\nAlphabetic(erhart)\nMidwestern(erhart)\nMozambican(erhart)\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> Midwestern(x))\nforall x (Midwestern(x) and Mozambican(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Kinky(x) and Mozambican(x) -> Brushlike(x))\nforall x (Mozambican(x) and Midwestern(x) -> Kinky(x))\nforall x (Kinky(x) -> Alphabetic(x))\nforall x (Midwestern(x) -> Mozambican(x))\n\nnot Midwestern(gere)\n\nforall x (Broadloom(x) -> Midwestern(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Mikael is singular. Mikael is eighteen. Mikael is haematal. Shalne is hesitant. Shalne is unfirm. Cosette is singular. Cosette is biblical. Cosette is eighteen. Cosette is punic. Cosette is haematal. If someone is unfirm then they are punic. Rough, haematal people are eighteen. If someone is hesitant and haematal then they are singular. White, punic people are hesitant. If someone is hesitant then they are eighteen. All punic people are haematal. Mikael is hesitant.", "logic": "\nSingular(mikael)\nEighteen(mikael)\nHaematal(mikael)\nHesitant(shalne)\nUnfirm(shalne)\nSingular(cosette)\nBiblical(cosette)\nEighteen(cosette)\nPunic(cosette)\nHaematal(cosette)\nforall x (Unfirm(x) -> Punic(x))\nforall x (Punic(x) and Haematal(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) and Haematal(x) -> Singular(x))\nforall x (Haematal(x) and Punic(x) -> Hesitant(x))\nforall x (Hesitant(x) -> Eighteen(x))\nforall x (Punic(x) -> Haematal(x))\n\nHesitant(mikael)\n\nforall x (Haematal(x) and Punic(x) -> Hesitant(x)) <- forall x (Unfirm(x) -> Punic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Marcelo is nighted. Marcelo is nonaged. Marcelo is grouped. Lorinda is elating. Lorinda is heatable. Uri is nighted. Uri is thornless. Uri is nonaged. Uri is curving. Uri is grouped. If someone is heatable then they are curving. Rough, grouped people are nonaged. If someone is elating and grouped then they are nighted. White, curving people are elating. If someone is elating then they are nonaged. All curving people are grouped. Uri is not heatable.", "logic": "\nNighted(marcelo)\nNonaged(marcelo)\nGrouped(marcelo)\nElating(lorinda)\nHeatable(lorinda)\nNighted(uri)\nThornless(uri)\nNonaged(uri)\nCurving(uri)\nGrouped(uri)\nforall x (Heatable(x) -> Curving(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) and Grouped(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Elating(x) and Grouped(x) -> Nighted(x))\nforall x (Grouped(x) and Curving(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Elating(x) -> Nonaged(x))\nforall x (Curving(x) -> Grouped(x))\n\nnot Heatable(uri)\n\nnot Heatable(uri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Rahal is consolable. Rahal is fricative. Rahal is sleazy. Lucky is pretorian. Lucky is orderly. Meggan is consolable. Meggan is sinning. Meggan is fricative. Meggan is tuneless. Meggan is sleazy. If someone is orderly then they are tuneless. Rough, sleazy people are fricative. If someone is pretorian and sleazy then they are consolable. White, tuneless people are pretorian. If someone is pretorian then they are fricative. All tuneless people are sleazy. Lucky is sinning.", "logic": "\nConsolable(rahal)\nFricative(rahal)\nSleazy(rahal)\nPretorian(lucky)\nOrderly(lucky)\nConsolable(meggan)\nSinning(meggan)\nFricative(meggan)\nTuneless(meggan)\nSleazy(meggan)\nforall x (Orderly(x) -> Tuneless(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) and Sleazy(x) -> Fricative(x))\nforall x (Pretorian(x) and Sleazy(x) -> Consolable(x))\nforall x (Sleazy(x) and Tuneless(x) -> Pretorian(x))\nforall x (Pretorian(x) -> Fricative(x))\nforall x (Tuneless(x) -> Sleazy(x))\n\nSinning(lucky)\n\nSinning(lucky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Daile is smiling. Daile is jazzy. Daile is barred. Leonanie is reversible. Leonanie is cathartic. Fernanda is smiling. Fernanda is prima. Fernanda is jazzy. Fernanda is infatuated. Fernanda is barred. If someone is cathartic then they are infatuated. Rough, barred people are jazzy. If someone is reversible and barred then they are smiling. White, infatuated people are reversible. If someone is reversible then they are jazzy. All infatuated people are barred. Daile is not prima.", "logic": "\nSmiling(daile)\nJazzy(daile)\nBarred(daile)\nReversible(leonanie)\nCathartic(leonanie)\nSmiling(fernanda)\nPrima(fernanda)\nJazzy(fernanda)\nInfatuated(fernanda)\nBarred(fernanda)\nforall x (Cathartic(x) -> Infatuated(x))\nforall x (Infatuated(x) and Barred(x) -> Jazzy(x))\nforall x (Reversible(x) and Barred(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Barred(x) and Infatuated(x) -> Reversible(x))\nforall x (Reversible(x) -> Jazzy(x))\nforall x (Infatuated(x) -> Barred(x))\n\nnot Prima(daile)\n\nnot Prima(daile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "Rafaelita is endermic. Rafaelita is unrigged. Rafaelita is humongous. Crawford is unresolved. Crawford is hedged. Averyl is endermic. Averyl is sapid. Averyl is unrigged. Averyl is maximizing. Averyl is humongous. If someone is hedged then they are maximizing. Rough, humongous people are unrigged. If someone is unresolved and humongous then they are endermic. White, maximizing people are unresolved. If someone is unresolved then they are unrigged. All maximizing people are humongous. Rafaelita is hedged.", "logic": "\nEndermic(rafaelita)\nUnrigged(rafaelita)\nHumongous(rafaelita)\nUnresolved(crawford)\nHedged(crawford)\nEndermic(averyl)\nSapid(averyl)\nUnrigged(averyl)\nMaximizing(averyl)\nHumongous(averyl)\nforall x (Hedged(x) -> Maximizing(x))\nforall x (Maximizing(x) and Humongous(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Unresolved(x) and Humongous(x) -> Endermic(x))\nforall x (Humongous(x) and Maximizing(x) -> Unresolved(x))\nforall x (Unresolved(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nforall x (Maximizing(x) -> Humongous(x))\n\nHedged(rafaelita)\n\nHedged(rafaelita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-458"} {"premises": "The marla embitter the maribeth. The dorise sculpt the maribeth. The dorise is fingered. The dorise is must. The dorise embitter the marla. The dorise reimburse the giffie. The dorise reimburse the maribeth. The giffie sculpt the marla. The giffie is quits. The giffie embitter the maribeth. The giffie reimburse the marla. The maribeth sculpt the dorise. The maribeth is quits. The maribeth embitter the marla. The maribeth reimburse the giffie. If someone reimburse the dorise then the dorise is cubist. If someone embitter the marla then the marla reimburse the dorise. If someone reimburse the giffie then they need the maribeth. If someone is cubist and must then they are quits. If the maribeth embitter the giffie and the maribeth reimburse the marla then the giffie is must. If someone sculpt the maribeth and the maribeth embitter the dorise then the dorise embitter the maribeth. The dorise is fingered.", "logic": "\nEmbitter(marla, maribeth)\nSculpt(dorise, maribeth)\nFingered(dorise)\nMust(dorise)\nEmbitter(dorise, marla)\nReimburse(dorise, giffie)\nReimburse(dorise, maribeth)\nSculpt(giffie, marla)\nQuits(giffie)\nEmbitter(giffie, maribeth)\nReimburse(giffie, marla)\nSculpt(maribeth, dorise)\nQuits(maribeth)\nEmbitter(maribeth, marla)\nReimburse(maribeth, giffie)\nforall x (Reimburse(x, dorise) -> Cubist(dorise))\nforall x (Embitter(x, marla) -> Reimburse(marla, dorise))\nforall x (Reimburse(x, giffie) -> Embitter(x, maribeth))\nforall x (Cubist(x) and Must(x) -> Quits(x))\nEmbitter(maribeth, giffie) and Reimburse(maribeth, marla) -> Must(giffie)\nforall x (Sculpt(x, maribeth) and Embitter(maribeth, dorise) -> Embitter(dorise, maribeth))\n\nFingered(dorise)\n\ntherefore Fingered(dorise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The kristos examine the bonita. The fitz slobber the bonita. The fitz is bacillar. The fitz is damn. The fitz examine the kristos. The fitz ambuscade the michael. The fitz ambuscade the bonita. The michael slobber the kristos. The michael is laggard. The michael examine the bonita. The michael ambuscade the kristos. The bonita slobber the fitz. The bonita is laggard. The bonita examine the kristos. The bonita ambuscade the michael. If someone ambuscade the fitz then the fitz is amort. If someone examine the kristos then the kristos ambuscade the fitz. If someone ambuscade the michael then they need the bonita. If someone is amort and damn then they are laggard. If the bonita examine the michael and the bonita ambuscade the kristos then the michael is damn. If someone slobber the bonita and the bonita examine the fitz then the fitz examine the bonita. The michael does not visit the kristos.", "logic": "\nExamine(kristos, bonita)\nSlobber(fitz, bonita)\nBacillar(fitz)\nDamn(fitz)\nExamine(fitz, kristos)\nAmbuscade(fitz, michael)\nAmbuscade(fitz, bonita)\nSlobber(michael, kristos)\nLaggard(michael)\nExamine(michael, bonita)\nAmbuscade(michael, kristos)\nSlobber(bonita, fitz)\nLaggard(bonita)\nExamine(bonita, kristos)\nAmbuscade(bonita, michael)\nforall x (Ambuscade(x, fitz) -> Amort(fitz))\nforall x (Examine(x, kristos) -> Ambuscade(kristos, fitz))\nforall x (Ambuscade(x, michael) -> Examine(x, bonita))\nforall x (Amort(x) and Damn(x) -> Laggard(x))\nExamine(bonita, michael) and Ambuscade(bonita, kristos) -> Damn(michael)\nforall x (Slobber(x, bonita) and Examine(bonita, fitz) -> Examine(fitz, bonita))\n\nnot Ambuscade(michael, kristos)\n\ntherefore Ambuscade(michael, kristos)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The butch rubberneck the tyler. The sherline homestead the tyler. The sherline is equitable. The sherline is elated. The sherline rubberneck the butch. The sherline blackberry the tiphany. The sherline blackberry the tyler. The tiphany homestead the butch. The tiphany is sneaking. The tiphany rubberneck the tyler. The tiphany blackberry the butch. The tyler homestead the sherline. The tyler is sneaking. The tyler rubberneck the butch. The tyler blackberry the tiphany. If someone blackberry the sherline then the sherline is crying. If someone rubberneck the butch then the butch blackberry the sherline. If someone blackberry the tiphany then they need the tyler. If someone is crying and elated then they are sneaking. If the tyler rubberneck the tiphany and the tyler blackberry the butch then the tiphany is elated. If someone homestead the tyler and the tyler rubberneck the sherline then the sherline rubberneck the tyler. The sherline rubberneck the tyler.", "logic": "\nRubberneck(butch, tyler)\nHomestead(sherline, tyler)\nEquitable(sherline)\nElated(sherline)\nRubberneck(sherline, butch)\nBlackberry(sherline, tiphany)\nBlackberry(sherline, tyler)\nHomestead(tiphany, butch)\nSneaking(tiphany)\nRubberneck(tiphany, tyler)\nBlackberry(tiphany, butch)\nHomestead(tyler, sherline)\nSneaking(tyler)\nRubberneck(tyler, butch)\nBlackberry(tyler, tiphany)\nforall x (Blackberry(x, sherline) -> Crying(sherline))\nforall x (Rubberneck(x, butch) -> Blackberry(butch, sherline))\nforall x (Blackberry(x, tiphany) -> Rubberneck(x, tyler))\nforall x (Crying(x) and Elated(x) -> Sneaking(x))\nRubberneck(tyler, tiphany) and Blackberry(tyler, butch) -> Elated(tiphany)\nforall x (Homestead(x, tyler) and Rubberneck(tyler, sherline) -> Rubberneck(sherline, tyler))\n\nRubberneck(sherline, tyler)\n\nBlackberry(sherline, tiphany) and forall x (Blackberry(x, tiphany) -> Rubberneck(x, tyler)) -> therefore Rubberneck(sherline, tyler)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The coletta rigidify the benita. The harrold demoralize the benita. The harrold is empurpled. The harrold is supplicant. The harrold rigidify the coletta. The harrold skyjack the florette. The harrold skyjack the benita. The florette demoralize the coletta. The florette is monaural. The florette rigidify the benita. The florette skyjack the coletta. The benita demoralize the harrold. The benita is monaural. The benita rigidify the coletta. The benita skyjack the florette. If someone skyjack the harrold then the harrold is subaquatic. If someone rigidify the coletta then the coletta skyjack the harrold. If someone skyjack the florette then they need the benita. If someone is subaquatic and supplicant then they are monaural. If the benita rigidify the florette and the benita skyjack the coletta then the florette is supplicant. If someone demoralize the benita and the benita rigidify the harrold then the harrold rigidify the benita. The coletta does not visit the harrold.", "logic": "\nRigidify(coletta, benita)\nDemoralize(harrold, benita)\nEmpurpled(harrold)\nSupplicant(harrold)\nRigidify(harrold, coletta)\nSkyjack(harrold, florette)\nSkyjack(harrold, benita)\nDemoralize(florette, coletta)\nMonaural(florette)\nRigidify(florette, benita)\nSkyjack(florette, coletta)\nDemoralize(benita, harrold)\nMonaural(benita)\nRigidify(benita, coletta)\nSkyjack(benita, florette)\nforall x (Skyjack(x, harrold) -> Subaquatic(harrold))\nforall x (Rigidify(x, coletta) -> Skyjack(coletta, harrold))\nforall x (Skyjack(x, florette) -> Rigidify(x, benita))\nforall x (Subaquatic(x) and Supplicant(x) -> Monaural(x))\nRigidify(benita, florette) and Skyjack(benita, coletta) -> Supplicant(florette)\nforall x (Demoralize(x, benita) and Rigidify(benita, harrold) -> Rigidify(harrold, benita))\n\nnot Skyjack(coletta, harrold)\n\nRigidify(benita, coletta) and forall x (Rigidify(x, coletta) -> Skyjack(coletta, harrold)) -> therefore Skyjack(coletta, harrold)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The nissy vindicate the winnie. The aurilia powerwash the winnie. The aurilia is lachrymose. The aurilia is swollen. The aurilia vindicate the nissy. The aurilia harbor the leo. The aurilia harbor the winnie. The leo powerwash the nissy. The leo is seventeen. The leo vindicate the winnie. The leo harbor the nissy. The winnie powerwash the aurilia. The winnie is seventeen. The winnie vindicate the nissy. The winnie harbor the leo. If someone harbor the aurilia then the aurilia is balsamy. If someone vindicate the nissy then the nissy harbor the aurilia. If someone harbor the leo then they need the winnie. If someone is balsamy and swollen then they are seventeen. If the winnie vindicate the leo and the winnie harbor the nissy then the leo is swollen. If someone powerwash the winnie and the winnie vindicate the aurilia then the aurilia vindicate the winnie. The aurilia is balsamy.", "logic": "\nVindicate(nissy, winnie)\nPowerwash(aurilia, winnie)\nLachrymose(aurilia)\nSwollen(aurilia)\nVindicate(aurilia, nissy)\nHarbor(aurilia, leo)\nHarbor(aurilia, winnie)\nPowerwash(leo, nissy)\nSeventeen(leo)\nVindicate(leo, winnie)\nHarbor(leo, nissy)\nPowerwash(winnie, aurilia)\nSeventeen(winnie)\nVindicate(winnie, nissy)\nHarbor(winnie, leo)\nforall x (Harbor(x, aurilia) -> Balsamy(aurilia))\nforall x (Vindicate(x, nissy) -> Harbor(nissy, aurilia))\nforall x (Harbor(x, leo) -> Vindicate(x, winnie))\nforall x (Balsamy(x) and Swollen(x) -> Seventeen(x))\nVindicate(winnie, leo) and Harbor(winnie, nissy) -> Swollen(leo)\nforall x (Powerwash(x, winnie) and Vindicate(winnie, aurilia) -> Vindicate(aurilia, winnie))\n\nBalsamy(aurilia)\n\nVindicate(winnie, nissy) and forall x (Vindicate(x, nissy) -> Harbor(nissy, aurilia)) -> therefore Harbor(nissy, aurilia) Harbor(nissy, aurilia) and forall x (Harbor(x, aurilia) -> Balsamy(aurilia)) -> therefore Balsamy(aurilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The alfred objectify the mahala. The josey cross the mahala. The josey is uncut. The josey is affluent. The josey objectify the alfred. The josey nurse the pandora. The josey nurse the mahala. The pandora cross the alfred. The pandora is windblown. The pandora objectify the mahala. The pandora nurse the alfred. The mahala cross the josey. The mahala is windblown. The mahala objectify the alfred. The mahala nurse the pandora. If someone nurse the josey then the josey is spasmodic. If someone objectify the alfred then the alfred nurse the josey. If someone nurse the pandora then they need the mahala. If someone is spasmodic and affluent then they are windblown. If the mahala objectify the pandora and the mahala nurse the alfred then the pandora is affluent. If someone cross the mahala and the mahala objectify the josey then the josey objectify the mahala. The josey is not spasmodic.", "logic": "\nObjectify(alfred, mahala)\nCross(josey, mahala)\nUncut(josey)\nAffluent(josey)\nObjectify(josey, alfred)\nNurse(josey, pandora)\nNurse(josey, mahala)\nCross(pandora, alfred)\nWindblown(pandora)\nObjectify(pandora, mahala)\nNurse(pandora, alfred)\nCross(mahala, josey)\nWindblown(mahala)\nObjectify(mahala, alfred)\nNurse(mahala, pandora)\nforall x (Nurse(x, josey) -> Spasmodic(josey))\nforall x (Objectify(x, alfred) -> Nurse(alfred, josey))\nforall x (Nurse(x, pandora) -> Objectify(x, mahala))\nforall x (Spasmodic(x) and Affluent(x) -> Windblown(x))\nObjectify(mahala, pandora) and Nurse(mahala, alfred) -> Affluent(pandora)\nforall x (Cross(x, mahala) and Objectify(mahala, josey) -> Objectify(josey, mahala))\n\nnot Spasmodic(josey)\n\nObjectify(mahala, alfred) and forall x (Objectify(x, alfred) -> Nurse(alfred, josey)) -> therefore Nurse(alfred, josey) Nurse(alfred, josey) and forall x (Nurse(x, josey) -> Spasmodic(josey)) -> therefore Spasmodic(josey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The oralia unpick the megan. The carline sample the megan. The carline is overland. The carline is clayey. The carline unpick the oralia. The carline roil the coriss. The carline roil the megan. The coriss sample the oralia. The coriss is oratorical. The coriss unpick the megan. The coriss roil the oralia. The megan sample the carline. The megan is oratorical. The megan unpick the oralia. The megan roil the coriss. If someone roil the carline then the carline is peruked. If someone unpick the oralia then the oralia roil the carline. If someone roil the coriss then they need the megan. If someone is peruked and clayey then they are oratorical. If the megan unpick the coriss and the megan roil the oralia then the coriss is clayey. If someone sample the megan and the megan unpick the carline then the carline unpick the megan. The carline is oratorical.", "logic": "\nUnpick(oralia, megan)\nSample(carline, megan)\nOverland(carline)\nClayey(carline)\nUnpick(carline, oralia)\nRoil(carline, coriss)\nRoil(carline, megan)\nSample(coriss, oralia)\nOratorical(coriss)\nUnpick(coriss, megan)\nRoil(coriss, oralia)\nSample(megan, carline)\nOratorical(megan)\nUnpick(megan, oralia)\nRoil(megan, coriss)\nforall x (Roil(x, carline) -> Peruked(carline))\nforall x (Unpick(x, oralia) -> Roil(oralia, carline))\nforall x (Roil(x, coriss) -> Unpick(x, megan))\nforall x (Peruked(x) and Clayey(x) -> Oratorical(x))\nUnpick(megan, coriss) and Roil(megan, oralia) -> Clayey(coriss)\nforall x (Sample(x, megan) and Unpick(megan, carline) -> Unpick(carline, megan))\n\nOratorical(carline)\n\nUnpick(megan, oralia) and forall x (Unpick(x, oralia) -> Roil(oralia, carline)) -> therefore Roil(oralia, carline) Roil(oralia, carline) and forall x (Roil(x, carline) -> Peruked(carline)) -> therefore Peruked(carline) Peruked(carline) and Clayey(carline) and forall x (Peruked(x) and Clayey(x) -> Oratorical(x)) -> therefore Oratorical(carline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The hank beplaster the corabelle. The charlot unmake the corabelle. The charlot is offensive. The charlot is automotive. The charlot beplaster the hank. The charlot solarise the melvin. The charlot solarise the corabelle. The melvin unmake the hank. The melvin is perirhinal. The melvin beplaster the corabelle. The melvin solarise the hank. The corabelle unmake the charlot. The corabelle is perirhinal. The corabelle beplaster the hank. The corabelle solarise the melvin. If someone solarise the charlot then the charlot is regulative. If someone beplaster the hank then the hank solarise the charlot. If someone solarise the melvin then they need the corabelle. If someone is regulative and automotive then they are perirhinal. If the corabelle beplaster the melvin and the corabelle solarise the hank then the melvin is automotive. If someone unmake the corabelle and the corabelle beplaster the charlot then the charlot beplaster the corabelle. The charlot is not perirhinal.", "logic": "\nBeplaster(hank, corabelle)\nUnmake(charlot, corabelle)\nOffensive(charlot)\nAutomotive(charlot)\nBeplaster(charlot, hank)\nSolarise(charlot, melvin)\nSolarise(charlot, corabelle)\nUnmake(melvin, hank)\nPerirhinal(melvin)\nBeplaster(melvin, corabelle)\nSolarise(melvin, hank)\nUnmake(corabelle, charlot)\nPerirhinal(corabelle)\nBeplaster(corabelle, hank)\nSolarise(corabelle, melvin)\nforall x (Solarise(x, charlot) -> Regulative(charlot))\nforall x (Beplaster(x, hank) -> Solarise(hank, charlot))\nforall x (Solarise(x, melvin) -> Beplaster(x, corabelle))\nforall x (Regulative(x) and Automotive(x) -> Perirhinal(x))\nBeplaster(corabelle, melvin) and Solarise(corabelle, hank) -> Automotive(melvin)\nforall x (Unmake(x, corabelle) and Beplaster(corabelle, charlot) -> Beplaster(charlot, corabelle))\n\nnot Perirhinal(charlot)\n\nBeplaster(corabelle, hank) and forall x (Beplaster(x, hank) -> Solarise(hank, charlot)) -> therefore Solarise(hank, charlot) Solarise(hank, charlot) and forall x (Solarise(x, charlot) -> Regulative(charlot)) -> therefore Regulative(charlot) Regulative(charlot) and Automotive(charlot) and forall x (Regulative(x) and Automotive(x) -> Perirhinal(x)) -> therefore Perirhinal(charlot)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The minerva mouse the augie. The berry coexist the augie. The berry is human. The berry is imminent. The berry mouse the minerva. The berry backdate the maura. The berry backdate the augie. The maura coexist the minerva. The maura is micro. The maura mouse the augie. The maura backdate the minerva. The augie coexist the berry. The augie is micro. The augie mouse the minerva. The augie backdate the maura. If someone backdate the berry then the berry is unreserved. If someone mouse the minerva then the minerva backdate the berry. If someone backdate the maura then they need the augie. If someone is unreserved and imminent then they are micro. If the augie mouse the maura and the augie backdate the minerva then the maura is imminent. If someone coexist the augie and the augie mouse the berry then the berry mouse the augie. The minerva is not micro.", "logic": "\nMouse(minerva, augie)\nCoexist(berry, augie)\nHuman(berry)\nImminent(berry)\nMouse(berry, minerva)\nBackdate(berry, maura)\nBackdate(berry, augie)\nCoexist(maura, minerva)\nMicro(maura)\nMouse(maura, augie)\nBackdate(maura, minerva)\nCoexist(augie, berry)\nMicro(augie)\nMouse(augie, minerva)\nBackdate(augie, maura)\nforall x (Backdate(x, berry) -> Unreserved(berry))\nforall x (Mouse(x, minerva) -> Backdate(minerva, berry))\nforall x (Backdate(x, maura) -> Mouse(x, augie))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) and Imminent(x) -> Micro(x))\nMouse(augie, maura) and Backdate(augie, minerva) -> Imminent(maura)\nforall x (Coexist(x, augie) and Mouse(augie, berry) -> Mouse(berry, augie))\n\nnot Micro(minerva)\n\nforall x (Unreserved(x) and Imminent(x) -> Micro(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The alisun chondrify the kelly. The leontyne tenant the kelly. The leontyne is meshed. The leontyne is feisty. The leontyne chondrify the alisun. The leontyne publicize the felecia. The leontyne publicize the kelly. The felecia tenant the alisun. The felecia is racial. The felecia chondrify the kelly. The felecia publicize the alisun. The kelly tenant the leontyne. The kelly is racial. The kelly chondrify the alisun. The kelly publicize the felecia. If someone publicize the leontyne then the leontyne is exhaustive. If someone chondrify the alisun then the alisun publicize the leontyne. If someone publicize the felecia then they need the kelly. If someone is exhaustive and feisty then they are racial. If the kelly chondrify the felecia and the kelly publicize the alisun then the felecia is feisty. If someone tenant the kelly and the kelly chondrify the leontyne then the leontyne chondrify the kelly. The felecia is feisty.", "logic": "\nChondrify(alisun, kelly)\nTenant(leontyne, kelly)\nMeshed(leontyne)\nFeisty(leontyne)\nChondrify(leontyne, alisun)\nPublicize(leontyne, felecia)\nPublicize(leontyne, kelly)\nTenant(felecia, alisun)\nRacial(felecia)\nChondrify(felecia, kelly)\nPublicize(felecia, alisun)\nTenant(kelly, leontyne)\nRacial(kelly)\nChondrify(kelly, alisun)\nPublicize(kelly, felecia)\nforall x (Publicize(x, leontyne) -> Exhaustive(leontyne))\nforall x (Chondrify(x, alisun) -> Publicize(alisun, leontyne))\nforall x (Publicize(x, felecia) -> Chondrify(x, kelly))\nforall x (Exhaustive(x) and Feisty(x) -> Racial(x))\nChondrify(kelly, felecia) and Publicize(kelly, alisun) -> Feisty(felecia)\nforall x (Tenant(x, kelly) and Chondrify(kelly, leontyne) -> Chondrify(leontyne, kelly))\n\nFeisty(felecia)\n\nChondrify(kelly, felecia) and Publicize(kelly, alisun) -> Feisty(felecia) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The clary edify the rickey. The lucilia bedhop the rickey. The lucilia is peppy. The lucilia is uninominal. The lucilia edify the clary. The lucilia envelop the faythe. The lucilia envelop the rickey. The faythe bedhop the clary. The faythe is swelled. The faythe edify the rickey. The faythe envelop the clary. The rickey bedhop the lucilia. The rickey is swelled. The rickey edify the clary. The rickey envelop the faythe. If someone envelop the lucilia then the lucilia is bottomed. If someone edify the clary then the clary envelop the lucilia. If someone envelop the faythe then they need the rickey. If someone is bottomed and uninominal then they are swelled. If the rickey edify the faythe and the rickey envelop the clary then the faythe is uninominal. If someone bedhop the rickey and the rickey edify the lucilia then the lucilia edify the rickey. The lucilia does not chase the clary.", "logic": "\nEdify(clary, rickey)\nBedhop(lucilia, rickey)\nPeppy(lucilia)\nUninominal(lucilia)\nEdify(lucilia, clary)\nEnvelop(lucilia, faythe)\nEnvelop(lucilia, rickey)\nBedhop(faythe, clary)\nSwelled(faythe)\nEdify(faythe, rickey)\nEnvelop(faythe, clary)\nBedhop(rickey, lucilia)\nSwelled(rickey)\nEdify(rickey, clary)\nEnvelop(rickey, faythe)\nforall x (Envelop(x, lucilia) -> Bottomed(lucilia))\nforall x (Edify(x, clary) -> Envelop(clary, lucilia))\nforall x (Envelop(x, faythe) -> Edify(x, rickey))\nforall x (Bottomed(x) and Uninominal(x) -> Swelled(x))\nEdify(rickey, faythe) and Envelop(rickey, clary) -> Uninominal(faythe)\nforall x (Bedhop(x, rickey) and Edify(rickey, lucilia) -> Edify(lucilia, rickey))\n\nnot Bedhop(lucilia, clary)\n\nnot Bedhop(lucilia, clary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The heda disrespect the elsbeth. The wittie galvanise the elsbeth. The wittie is penal. The wittie is anopheline. The wittie disrespect the heda. The wittie unlace the nina. The wittie unlace the elsbeth. The nina galvanise the heda. The nina is expansive. The nina disrespect the elsbeth. The nina unlace the heda. The elsbeth galvanise the wittie. The elsbeth is expansive. The elsbeth disrespect the heda. The elsbeth unlace the nina. If someone unlace the wittie then the wittie is rhodesian. If someone disrespect the heda then the heda unlace the wittie. If someone unlace the nina then they need the elsbeth. If someone is rhodesian and anopheline then they are expansive. If the elsbeth disrespect the nina and the elsbeth unlace the heda then the nina is anopheline. If someone galvanise the elsbeth and the elsbeth disrespect the wittie then the wittie disrespect the elsbeth. The wittie galvanise the wittie.", "logic": "\nDisrespect(heda, elsbeth)\nGalvanise(wittie, elsbeth)\nPenal(wittie)\nAnopheline(wittie)\nDisrespect(wittie, heda)\nUnlace(wittie, nina)\nUnlace(wittie, elsbeth)\nGalvanise(nina, heda)\nExpansive(nina)\nDisrespect(nina, elsbeth)\nUnlace(nina, heda)\nGalvanise(elsbeth, wittie)\nExpansive(elsbeth)\nDisrespect(elsbeth, heda)\nUnlace(elsbeth, nina)\nforall x (Unlace(x, wittie) -> Rhodesian(wittie))\nforall x (Disrespect(x, heda) -> Unlace(heda, wittie))\nforall x (Unlace(x, nina) -> Disrespect(x, elsbeth))\nforall x (Rhodesian(x) and Anopheline(x) -> Expansive(x))\nDisrespect(elsbeth, nina) and Unlace(elsbeth, heda) -> Anopheline(nina)\nforall x (Galvanise(x, elsbeth) and Disrespect(elsbeth, wittie) -> Disrespect(wittie, elsbeth))\n\nGalvanise(wittie, wittie)\n\nGalvanise(wittie, wittie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The shandy monitor the lori. The mirabelle pockmark the lori. The mirabelle is abstracted. The mirabelle is xxii. The mirabelle monitor the shandy. The mirabelle temporize the queada. The mirabelle temporize the lori. The queada pockmark the shandy. The queada is lacy. The queada monitor the lori. The queada temporize the shandy. The lori pockmark the mirabelle. The lori is lacy. The lori monitor the shandy. The lori temporize the queada. If someone temporize the mirabelle then the mirabelle is laboured. If someone monitor the shandy then the shandy temporize the mirabelle. If someone temporize the queada then they need the lori. If someone is laboured and xxii then they are lacy. If the lori monitor the queada and the lori temporize the shandy then the queada is xxii. If someone pockmark the lori and the lori monitor the mirabelle then the mirabelle monitor the lori. The mirabelle does not need the mirabelle.", "logic": "\nMonitor(shandy, lori)\nPockmark(mirabelle, lori)\nAbstracted(mirabelle)\nXxii(mirabelle)\nMonitor(mirabelle, shandy)\nTemporize(mirabelle, queada)\nTemporize(mirabelle, lori)\nPockmark(queada, shandy)\nLacy(queada)\nMonitor(queada, lori)\nTemporize(queada, shandy)\nPockmark(lori, mirabelle)\nLacy(lori)\nMonitor(lori, shandy)\nTemporize(lori, queada)\nforall x (Temporize(x, mirabelle) -> Laboured(mirabelle))\nforall x (Monitor(x, shandy) -> Temporize(shandy, mirabelle))\nforall x (Temporize(x, queada) -> Monitor(x, lori))\nforall x (Laboured(x) and Xxii(x) -> Lacy(x))\nMonitor(lori, queada) and Temporize(lori, shandy) -> Xxii(queada)\nforall x (Pockmark(x, lori) and Monitor(lori, mirabelle) -> Monitor(mirabelle, lori))\n\nnot Monitor(mirabelle, mirabelle)\n\nnot Monitor(mirabelle, mirabelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The gearard pitch the josefina. The willamina squawk the josefina. The willamina is coolheaded. The willamina is rhythmic. The willamina pitch the gearard. The willamina divest the veronica. The willamina divest the josefina. The veronica squawk the gearard. The veronica is discordant. The veronica pitch the josefina. The veronica divest the gearard. The josefina squawk the willamina. The josefina is discordant. The josefina pitch the gearard. The josefina divest the veronica. If someone divest the willamina then the willamina is bivalve. If someone pitch the gearard then the gearard divest the willamina. If someone divest the veronica then they need the josefina. If someone is bivalve and rhythmic then they are discordant. If the josefina pitch the veronica and the josefina divest the gearard then the veronica is rhythmic. If someone squawk the josefina and the josefina pitch the willamina then the willamina pitch the josefina. The gearard squawk the willamina.", "logic": "\nPitch(gearard, josefina)\nSquawk(willamina, josefina)\nCoolheaded(willamina)\nRhythmic(willamina)\nPitch(willamina, gearard)\nDivest(willamina, veronica)\nDivest(willamina, josefina)\nSquawk(veronica, gearard)\nDiscordant(veronica)\nPitch(veronica, josefina)\nDivest(veronica, gearard)\nSquawk(josefina, willamina)\nDiscordant(josefina)\nPitch(josefina, gearard)\nDivest(josefina, veronica)\nforall x (Divest(x, willamina) -> Bivalve(willamina))\nforall x (Pitch(x, gearard) -> Divest(gearard, willamina))\nforall x (Divest(x, veronica) -> Pitch(x, josefina))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) and Rhythmic(x) -> Discordant(x))\nPitch(josefina, veronica) and Divest(josefina, gearard) -> Rhythmic(veronica)\nforall x (Squawk(x, josefina) and Pitch(josefina, willamina) -> Pitch(willamina, josefina))\n\nSquawk(gearard, willamina)\n\nSquawk(gearard, willamina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The wheeler blandish the thibaud. The cherin betide the thibaud. The cherin is moldy. The cherin is hurt. The cherin blandish the wheeler. The cherin gimp the siegfried. The cherin gimp the thibaud. The siegfried betide the wheeler. The siegfried is pearly. The siegfried blandish the thibaud. The siegfried gimp the wheeler. The thibaud betide the cherin. The thibaud is pearly. The thibaud blandish the wheeler. The thibaud gimp the siegfried. If someone gimp the cherin then the cherin is mongoloid. If someone blandish the wheeler then the wheeler gimp the cherin. If someone gimp the siegfried then they need the thibaud. If someone is mongoloid and hurt then they are pearly. If the thibaud blandish the siegfried and the thibaud gimp the wheeler then the siegfried is hurt. If someone betide the thibaud and the thibaud blandish the cherin then the cherin blandish the thibaud. The siegfried does not chase the siegfried.", "logic": "\nBlandish(wheeler, thibaud)\nBetide(cherin, thibaud)\nMoldy(cherin)\nHurt(cherin)\nBlandish(cherin, wheeler)\nGimp(cherin, siegfried)\nGimp(cherin, thibaud)\nBetide(siegfried, wheeler)\nPearly(siegfried)\nBlandish(siegfried, thibaud)\nGimp(siegfried, wheeler)\nBetide(thibaud, cherin)\nPearly(thibaud)\nBlandish(thibaud, wheeler)\nGimp(thibaud, siegfried)\nforall x (Gimp(x, cherin) -> Mongoloid(cherin))\nforall x (Blandish(x, wheeler) -> Gimp(wheeler, cherin))\nforall x (Gimp(x, siegfried) -> Blandish(x, thibaud))\nforall x (Mongoloid(x) and Hurt(x) -> Pearly(x))\nBlandish(thibaud, siegfried) and Gimp(thibaud, wheeler) -> Hurt(siegfried)\nforall x (Betide(x, thibaud) and Blandish(thibaud, cherin) -> Blandish(cherin, thibaud))\n\nnot Betide(siegfried, siegfried)\n\nnot Betide(siegfried, siegfried) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The meir represent the rudolph. The corrina prattle the rudolph. The corrina is putrescent. The corrina is solitary. The corrina represent the meir. The corrina untie the sterne. The corrina untie the rudolph. The sterne prattle the meir. The sterne is accordant. The sterne represent the rudolph. The sterne untie the meir. The rudolph prattle the corrina. The rudolph is accordant. The rudolph represent the meir. The rudolph untie the sterne. If someone untie the corrina then the corrina is trackless. If someone represent the meir then the meir untie the corrina. If someone untie the sterne then they need the rudolph. If someone is trackless and solitary then they are accordant. If the rudolph represent the sterne and the rudolph untie the meir then the sterne is solitary. If someone prattle the rudolph and the rudolph represent the corrina then the corrina represent the rudolph. The meir is trackless.", "logic": "\nRepresent(meir, rudolph)\nPrattle(corrina, rudolph)\nPutrescent(corrina)\nSolitary(corrina)\nRepresent(corrina, meir)\nUntie(corrina, sterne)\nUntie(corrina, rudolph)\nPrattle(sterne, meir)\nAccordant(sterne)\nRepresent(sterne, rudolph)\nUntie(sterne, meir)\nPrattle(rudolph, corrina)\nAccordant(rudolph)\nRepresent(rudolph, meir)\nUntie(rudolph, sterne)\nforall x (Untie(x, corrina) -> Trackless(corrina))\nforall x (Represent(x, meir) -> Untie(meir, corrina))\nforall x (Untie(x, sterne) -> Represent(x, rudolph))\nforall x (Trackless(x) and Solitary(x) -> Accordant(x))\nRepresent(rudolph, sterne) and Untie(rudolph, meir) -> Solitary(sterne)\nforall x (Prattle(x, rudolph) and Represent(rudolph, corrina) -> Represent(corrina, rudolph))\n\nTrackless(meir)\n\nTrackless(meir) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-379"} {"premises": "The ethel does not eat the padraig. The ethel is focused. The ethel is fetching. The ethel is rhymed. The ethel is not needy. The ethel is lossless. The ethel does not like the padraig. The ethel does not need the padraig. The padraig emplane the ethel. The padraig is focused. The padraig is fetching. The padraig is rhymed. The padraig is needy. The padraig is lossless. The padraig prick the ethel. The padraig veer the ethel. If something veer the padraig and the padraig prick the ethel then the ethel is fetching. If something is fetching and it does not eat the ethel then the ethel is rhymed. If something emplane the ethel and it is focused then it emplane the padraig. If something emplane the ethel then it veer the padraig. If something is lossless then it is rhymed. If something emplane the ethel and the ethel veer the padraig then it is lossless. The ethel does not like the padraig.", "logic": "\nnot Emplane(ethel, padraig)\nFocused(ethel)\nFetching(ethel)\nRhymed(ethel)\nnot Needy(ethel)\nLossless(ethel)\nnot Prick(ethel, padraig)\nnot Veer(ethel, padraig)\nEmplane(padraig, ethel)\nFocused(padraig)\nFetching(padraig)\nRhymed(padraig)\nNeedy(padraig)\nLossless(padraig)\nPrick(padraig, ethel)\nVeer(padraig, ethel)\nforall x (Veer(x, padraig) and Prick(padraig, ethel) -> Fetching(ethel))\nforall x (Fetching(x) and not Emplane(x, ethel) -> Rhymed(ethel))\nforall x (Emplane(x, ethel) and Focused(x) -> Emplane(x, padraig))\nforall x (Emplane(x, ethel) -> Veer(x, padraig))\nforall x (Lossless(x) -> Rhymed(x))\nforall x (Emplane(x, ethel) and Veer(ethel, padraig) -> Lossless(x))\n\nnot Prick(ethel, padraig)\n\ntherefore not Prick(ethel, padraig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "The arther does not eat the fiann. The arther is eristical. The arther is occlusive. The arther is polynomial. The arther is not chechen. The arther is loth. The arther does not like the fiann. The arther does not need the fiann. The fiann burlesque the arther. The fiann is eristical. The fiann is occlusive. The fiann is polynomial. The fiann is chechen. The fiann is loth. The fiann repossess the arther. The fiann relyric the arther. If something relyric the fiann and the fiann repossess the arther then the arther is occlusive. If something is occlusive and it does not eat the arther then the arther is polynomial. If something burlesque the arther and it is eristical then it burlesque the fiann. If something burlesque the arther then it relyric the fiann. If something is loth then it is polynomial. If something burlesque the arther and the arther relyric the fiann then it is loth. The arther is not eristical.", "logic": "\nnot Burlesque(arther, fiann)\nEristical(arther)\nOcclusive(arther)\nPolynomial(arther)\nnot Chechen(arther)\nLoth(arther)\nnot Repossess(arther, fiann)\nnot Relyric(arther, fiann)\nBurlesque(fiann, arther)\nEristical(fiann)\nOcclusive(fiann)\nPolynomial(fiann)\nChechen(fiann)\nLoth(fiann)\nRepossess(fiann, arther)\nRelyric(fiann, arther)\nforall x (Relyric(x, fiann) and Repossess(fiann, arther) -> Occlusive(arther))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and not Burlesque(x, arther) -> Polynomial(arther))\nforall x (Burlesque(x, arther) and Eristical(x) -> Burlesque(x, fiann))\nforall x (Burlesque(x, arther) -> Relyric(x, fiann))\nforall x (Loth(x) -> Polynomial(x))\nforall x (Burlesque(x, arther) and Relyric(arther, fiann) -> Loth(x))\n\nnot Eristical(arther)\n\ntherefore Eristical(arther)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "The rees does not eat the roslyn. The rees is anecdotal. The rees is crustose. The rees is balmy. The rees is not associate. The rees is spic. The rees does not like the roslyn. The rees does not need the roslyn. The roslyn wrestle the rees. The roslyn is anecdotal. The roslyn is crustose. The roslyn is balmy. The roslyn is associate. The roslyn is spic. The roslyn chine the rees. The roslyn sham the rees. If something sham the roslyn and the roslyn chine the rees then the rees is crustose. If something is crustose and it does not eat the rees then the rees is balmy. If something wrestle the rees and it is anecdotal then it wrestle the roslyn. If something wrestle the rees then it sham the roslyn. If something is spic then it is balmy. If something wrestle the rees and the rees sham the roslyn then it is spic. The roslyn sham the roslyn.", "logic": "\nnot Wrestle(rees, roslyn)\nAnecdotal(rees)\nCrustose(rees)\nBalmy(rees)\nnot Associate(rees)\nSpic(rees)\nnot Chine(rees, roslyn)\nnot Sham(rees, roslyn)\nWrestle(roslyn, rees)\nAnecdotal(roslyn)\nCrustose(roslyn)\nBalmy(roslyn)\nAssociate(roslyn)\nSpic(roslyn)\nChine(roslyn, rees)\nSham(roslyn, rees)\nforall x (Sham(x, roslyn) and Chine(roslyn, rees) -> Crustose(rees))\nforall x (Crustose(x) and not Wrestle(x, rees) -> Balmy(rees))\nforall x (Wrestle(x, rees) and Anecdotal(x) -> Wrestle(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Wrestle(x, rees) -> Sham(x, roslyn))\nforall x (Spic(x) -> Balmy(x))\nforall x (Wrestle(x, rees) and Sham(rees, roslyn) -> Spic(x))\n\nSham(roslyn, roslyn)\n\nWrestle(roslyn, rees) and forall x (Wrestle(x, rees) -> Sham(x, roslyn)) -> therefore Sham(roslyn, roslyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "The katleen does not eat the sacha. The katleen is broadloom. The katleen is consenting. The katleen is binucleate. The katleen is not exact. The katleen is final. The katleen does not like the sacha. The katleen does not need the sacha. The sacha hobble the katleen. The sacha is broadloom. The sacha is consenting. The sacha is binucleate. The sacha is exact. The sacha is final. The sacha fill the katleen. The sacha tone the katleen. If something tone the sacha and the sacha fill the katleen then the katleen is consenting. If something is consenting and it does not eat the katleen then the katleen is binucleate. If something hobble the katleen and it is broadloom then it hobble the sacha. If something hobble the katleen then it tone the sacha. If something is final then it is binucleate. If something hobble the katleen and the katleen tone the sacha then it is final. The sacha does not eat the sacha.", "logic": "\nnot Hobble(katleen, sacha)\nBroadloom(katleen)\nConsenting(katleen)\nBinucleate(katleen)\nnot Exact(katleen)\nFinal(katleen)\nnot Fill(katleen, sacha)\nnot Tone(katleen, sacha)\nHobble(sacha, katleen)\nBroadloom(sacha)\nConsenting(sacha)\nBinucleate(sacha)\nExact(sacha)\nFinal(sacha)\nFill(sacha, katleen)\nTone(sacha, katleen)\nforall x (Tone(x, sacha) and Fill(sacha, katleen) -> Consenting(katleen))\nforall x (Consenting(x) and not Hobble(x, katleen) -> Binucleate(katleen))\nforall x (Hobble(x, katleen) and Broadloom(x) -> Hobble(x, sacha))\nforall x (Hobble(x, katleen) -> Tone(x, sacha))\nforall x (Final(x) -> Binucleate(x))\nforall x (Hobble(x, katleen) and Tone(katleen, sacha) -> Final(x))\n\nnot Hobble(sacha, sacha)\n\nHobble(sacha, katleen) and Broadloom(sacha) and forall x (Hobble(x, katleen) and Broadloom(x) -> Hobble(x, sacha)) -> therefore Hobble(sacha, sacha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "The hermina does not eat the rosana. The hermina is softening. The hermina is stratified. The hermina is allowable. The hermina is not very. The hermina is feudatory. The hermina does not like the rosana. The hermina does not need the rosana. The rosana poleax the hermina. The rosana is softening. The rosana is stratified. The rosana is allowable. The rosana is very. The rosana is feudatory. The rosana husk the hermina. The rosana misread the hermina. If something misread the rosana and the rosana husk the hermina then the hermina is stratified. If something is stratified and it does not eat the hermina then the hermina is allowable. If something poleax the hermina and it is softening then it poleax the rosana. If something poleax the hermina then it misread the rosana. If something is feudatory then it is allowable. If something poleax the hermina and the hermina misread the rosana then it is feudatory. The hermina does not like the hermina.", "logic": "\nnot Poleax(hermina, rosana)\nSoftening(hermina)\nStratified(hermina)\nAllowable(hermina)\nnot Very(hermina)\nFeudatory(hermina)\nnot Husk(hermina, rosana)\nnot Misread(hermina, rosana)\nPoleax(rosana, hermina)\nSoftening(rosana)\nStratified(rosana)\nAllowable(rosana)\nVery(rosana)\nFeudatory(rosana)\nHusk(rosana, hermina)\nMisread(rosana, hermina)\nforall x (Misread(x, rosana) and Husk(rosana, hermina) -> Stratified(hermina))\nforall x (Stratified(x) and not Poleax(x, hermina) -> Allowable(hermina))\nforall x (Poleax(x, hermina) and Softening(x) -> Poleax(x, rosana))\nforall x (Poleax(x, hermina) -> Misread(x, rosana))\nforall x (Feudatory(x) -> Allowable(x))\nforall x (Poleax(x, hermina) and Misread(hermina, rosana) -> Feudatory(x))\n\nnot Husk(hermina, hermina)\n\nnot Husk(hermina, hermina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "The rand does not eat the norina. The rand is unsheared. The rand is spanking. The rand is trochaic. The rand is not liverish. The rand is conjoined. The rand does not like the norina. The rand does not need the norina. The norina fancy the rand. The norina is unsheared. The norina is spanking. The norina is trochaic. The norina is liverish. The norina is conjoined. The norina peek the rand. The norina popularise the rand. If something popularise the norina and the norina peek the rand then the rand is spanking. If something is spanking and it does not eat the rand then the rand is trochaic. If something fancy the rand and it is unsheared then it fancy the norina. If something fancy the rand then it popularise the norina. If something is conjoined then it is trochaic. If something fancy the rand and the rand popularise the norina then it is conjoined. The norina peek the norina.", "logic": "\nnot Fancy(rand, norina)\nUnsheared(rand)\nSpanking(rand)\nTrochaic(rand)\nnot Liverish(rand)\nConjoined(rand)\nnot Peek(rand, norina)\nnot Popularise(rand, norina)\nFancy(norina, rand)\nUnsheared(norina)\nSpanking(norina)\nTrochaic(norina)\nLiverish(norina)\nConjoined(norina)\nPeek(norina, rand)\nPopularise(norina, rand)\nforall x (Popularise(x, norina) and Peek(norina, rand) -> Spanking(rand))\nforall x (Spanking(x) and not Fancy(x, rand) -> Trochaic(rand))\nforall x (Fancy(x, rand) and Unsheared(x) -> Fancy(x, norina))\nforall x (Fancy(x, rand) -> Popularise(x, norina))\nforall x (Conjoined(x) -> Trochaic(x))\nforall x (Fancy(x, rand) and Popularise(rand, norina) -> Conjoined(x))\n\nPeek(norina, norina)\n\nPeek(norina, norina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "The rosanna does not eat the lonnie. The rosanna is weatherly. The rosanna is peppy. The rosanna is reduced. The rosanna is not studded. The rosanna is silicious. The rosanna does not like the lonnie. The rosanna does not need the lonnie. The lonnie discontent the rosanna. The lonnie is weatherly. The lonnie is peppy. The lonnie is reduced. The lonnie is studded. The lonnie is silicious. The lonnie jelly the rosanna. The lonnie porter the rosanna. If something porter the lonnie and the lonnie jelly the rosanna then the rosanna is peppy. If something is peppy and it does not eat the rosanna then the rosanna is reduced. If something discontent the rosanna and it is weatherly then it discontent the lonnie. If something discontent the rosanna then it porter the lonnie. If something is silicious then it is reduced. If something discontent the rosanna and the rosanna porter the lonnie then it is silicious. The rosanna does not need the rosanna.", "logic": "\nnot Discontent(rosanna, lonnie)\nWeatherly(rosanna)\nPeppy(rosanna)\nReduced(rosanna)\nnot Studded(rosanna)\nSilicious(rosanna)\nnot Jelly(rosanna, lonnie)\nnot Porter(rosanna, lonnie)\nDiscontent(lonnie, rosanna)\nWeatherly(lonnie)\nPeppy(lonnie)\nReduced(lonnie)\nStudded(lonnie)\nSilicious(lonnie)\nJelly(lonnie, rosanna)\nPorter(lonnie, rosanna)\nforall x (Porter(x, lonnie) and Jelly(lonnie, rosanna) -> Peppy(rosanna))\nforall x (Peppy(x) and not Discontent(x, rosanna) -> Reduced(rosanna))\nforall x (Discontent(x, rosanna) and Weatherly(x) -> Discontent(x, lonnie))\nforall x (Discontent(x, rosanna) -> Porter(x, lonnie))\nforall x (Silicious(x) -> Reduced(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x, rosanna) and Porter(rosanna, lonnie) -> Silicious(x))\n\nnot Porter(rosanna, rosanna)\n\nnot Porter(rosanna, rosanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "The winston does not eat the pammy. The winston is wiggly. The winston is knobby. The winston is autophytic. The winston is not repulsive. The winston is pert. The winston does not like the pammy. The winston does not need the pammy. The pammy glamorise the winston. The pammy is wiggly. The pammy is knobby. The pammy is autophytic. The pammy is repulsive. The pammy is pert. The pammy track the winston. The pammy stylise the winston. If something stylise the pammy and the pammy track the winston then the winston is knobby. If something is knobby and it does not eat the winston then the winston is autophytic. If something glamorise the winston and it is wiggly then it glamorise the pammy. If something glamorise the winston then it stylise the pammy. If something is pert then it is autophytic. If something glamorise the winston and the winston stylise the pammy then it is pert. The winston glamorise the winston.", "logic": "\nnot Glamorise(winston, pammy)\nWiggly(winston)\nKnobby(winston)\nAutophytic(winston)\nnot Repulsive(winston)\nPert(winston)\nnot Track(winston, pammy)\nnot Stylise(winston, pammy)\nGlamorise(pammy, winston)\nWiggly(pammy)\nKnobby(pammy)\nAutophytic(pammy)\nRepulsive(pammy)\nPert(pammy)\nTrack(pammy, winston)\nStylise(pammy, winston)\nforall x (Stylise(x, pammy) and Track(pammy, winston) -> Knobby(winston))\nforall x (Knobby(x) and not Glamorise(x, winston) -> Autophytic(winston))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, winston) and Wiggly(x) -> Glamorise(x, pammy))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, winston) -> Stylise(x, pammy))\nforall x (Pert(x) -> Autophytic(x))\nforall x (Glamorise(x, winston) and Stylise(winston, pammy) -> Pert(x))\n\nGlamorise(winston, winston)\n\nGlamorise(winston, winston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-20"} {"premises": "Oralia is not meritless. Trude is not saurian. Trude is ostensible. Trude is dreamless. Trude is meritless. Trude is not hemophilic. Trude is pyrogallic. Nickie is meritless. Nedi is not savourless. Nedi is ostensible. If someone is meritless then they are savourless. If Nickie is savourless then Nickie is dreamless. If Nickie is savourless and Nickie is not ostensible then Nickie is meritless. All dreamless people are pyrogallic. If someone is hemophilic and saurian then they are not dreamless. If Trude is not savourless then Trude is saurian. Trude is not saurian.", "logic": "\nnot Meritless(oralia)\nnot Saurian(trude)\nOstensible(trude)\nDreamless(trude)\nMeritless(trude)\nnot Hemophilic(trude)\nPyrogallic(trude)\nMeritless(nickie)\nnot Savourless(nedi)\nOstensible(nedi)\nforall x (Meritless(x) -> Savourless(x))\nSavourless(nickie) -> Dreamless(nickie)\nSavourless(nickie) and not Ostensible(nickie) -> Meritless(nickie)\nforall x (Dreamless(x) -> Pyrogallic(x))\nforall x (Hemophilic(x) and Saurian(x) -> not Dreamless(x))\nnot Savourless(trude) -> Saurian(trude)\n\nnot Saurian(trude)\n\ntherefore not Saurian(trude)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Jake is not bushy. Gertrud is not loose. Gertrud is grieving. Gertrud is moonlit. Gertrud is bushy. Gertrud is not imaginable. Gertrud is leisured. Tatum is bushy. Winonah is not disheveled. Winonah is grieving. If someone is bushy then they are disheveled. If Tatum is disheveled then Tatum is moonlit. If Tatum is disheveled and Tatum is not grieving then Tatum is bushy. All moonlit people are leisured. If someone is imaginable and loose then they are not moonlit. If Gertrud is not disheveled then Gertrud is loose. Gertrud is loose.", "logic": "\nnot Bushy(jake)\nnot Loose(gertrud)\nGrieving(gertrud)\nMoonlit(gertrud)\nBushy(gertrud)\nnot Imaginable(gertrud)\nLeisured(gertrud)\nBushy(tatum)\nnot Disheveled(winonah)\nGrieving(winonah)\nforall x (Bushy(x) -> Disheveled(x))\nDisheveled(tatum) -> Moonlit(tatum)\nDisheveled(tatum) and not Grieving(tatum) -> Bushy(tatum)\nforall x (Moonlit(x) -> Leisured(x))\nforall x (Imaginable(x) and Loose(x) -> not Moonlit(x))\nnot Disheveled(gertrud) -> Loose(gertrud)\n\nLoose(gertrud)\n\ntherefore not Loose(gertrud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Pet is not squawky. Parrnell is not foreign. Parrnell is cutthroat. Parrnell is placable. Parrnell is squawky. Parrnell is not unenforced. Parrnell is uncoiled. Ilsa is squawky. Derron is not adsorptive. Derron is cutthroat. If someone is squawky then they are adsorptive. If Ilsa is adsorptive then Ilsa is placable. If Ilsa is adsorptive and Ilsa is not cutthroat then Ilsa is squawky. All placable people are uncoiled. If someone is unenforced and foreign then they are not placable. If Parrnell is not adsorptive then Parrnell is foreign. Parrnell is adsorptive.", "logic": "\nnot Squawky(pet)\nnot Foreign(parrnell)\nCutthroat(parrnell)\nPlacable(parrnell)\nSquawky(parrnell)\nnot Unenforced(parrnell)\nUncoiled(parrnell)\nSquawky(ilsa)\nnot Adsorptive(derron)\nCutthroat(derron)\nforall x (Squawky(x) -> Adsorptive(x))\nAdsorptive(ilsa) -> Placable(ilsa)\nAdsorptive(ilsa) and not Cutthroat(ilsa) -> Squawky(ilsa)\nforall x (Placable(x) -> Uncoiled(x))\nforall x (Unenforced(x) and Foreign(x) -> not Placable(x))\nnot Adsorptive(parrnell) -> Foreign(parrnell)\n\nAdsorptive(parrnell)\n\nSquawky(parrnell) and forall x (Squawky(x) -> Adsorptive(x)) -> therefore Adsorptive(parrnell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Sonnie is not majuscular. Zorro is not siliceous. Zorro is dynastic. Zorro is glistening. Zorro is majuscular. Zorro is not exoteric. Zorro is flukey. Matthus is majuscular. Coralyn is not suntanned. Coralyn is dynastic. If someone is majuscular then they are suntanned. If Matthus is suntanned then Matthus is glistening. If Matthus is suntanned and Matthus is not dynastic then Matthus is majuscular. All glistening people are flukey. If someone is exoteric and siliceous then they are not glistening. If Zorro is not suntanned then Zorro is siliceous. Matthus is not suntanned.", "logic": "\nnot Majuscular(sonnie)\nnot Siliceous(zorro)\nDynastic(zorro)\nGlistening(zorro)\nMajuscular(zorro)\nnot Exoteric(zorro)\nFlukey(zorro)\nMajuscular(matthus)\nnot Suntanned(coralyn)\nDynastic(coralyn)\nforall x (Majuscular(x) -> Suntanned(x))\nSuntanned(matthus) -> Glistening(matthus)\nSuntanned(matthus) and not Dynastic(matthus) -> Majuscular(matthus)\nforall x (Glistening(x) -> Flukey(x))\nforall x (Exoteric(x) and Siliceous(x) -> not Glistening(x))\nnot Suntanned(zorro) -> Siliceous(zorro)\n\nnot Suntanned(matthus)\n\nMajuscular(matthus) and forall x (Majuscular(x) -> Suntanned(x)) -> therefore Suntanned(matthus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Torre is not edacious. Minta is not painted. Minta is instant. Minta is unheeded. Minta is edacious. Minta is not vertical. Minta is erudite. Morris is edacious. Rex is not boorish. Rex is instant. If someone is edacious then they are boorish. If Morris is boorish then Morris is unheeded. If Morris is boorish and Morris is not instant then Morris is edacious. All unheeded people are erudite. If someone is vertical and painted then they are not unheeded. If Minta is not boorish then Minta is painted. Morris is unheeded.", "logic": "\nnot Edacious(torre)\nnot Painted(minta)\nInstant(minta)\nUnheeded(minta)\nEdacious(minta)\nnot Vertical(minta)\nErudite(minta)\nEdacious(morris)\nnot Boorish(rex)\nInstant(rex)\nforall x (Edacious(x) -> Boorish(x))\nBoorish(morris) -> Unheeded(morris)\nBoorish(morris) and not Instant(morris) -> Edacious(morris)\nforall x (Unheeded(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Vertical(x) and Painted(x) -> not Unheeded(x))\nnot Boorish(minta) -> Painted(minta)\n\nUnheeded(morris)\n\nEdacious(morris) and forall x (Edacious(x) -> Boorish(x)) -> therefore Boorish(morris) Boorish(morris) and Boorish(morris) -> Unheeded(morris) -> therefore Unheeded(morris)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Jeraldine is not peregrine. Ardith is not deflective. Ardith is corneal. Ardith is unashamed. Ardith is peregrine. Ardith is not unvented. Ardith is endergonic. Moina is peregrine. Elsie is not reliable. Elsie is corneal. If someone is peregrine then they are reliable. If Moina is reliable then Moina is unashamed. If Moina is reliable and Moina is not corneal then Moina is peregrine. All unashamed people are endergonic. If someone is unvented and deflective then they are not unashamed. If Ardith is not reliable then Ardith is deflective. Moina is not unashamed.", "logic": "\nnot Peregrine(jeraldine)\nnot Deflective(ardith)\nCorneal(ardith)\nUnashamed(ardith)\nPeregrine(ardith)\nnot Unvented(ardith)\nEndergonic(ardith)\nPeregrine(moina)\nnot Reliable(elsie)\nCorneal(elsie)\nforall x (Peregrine(x) -> Reliable(x))\nReliable(moina) -> Unashamed(moina)\nReliable(moina) and not Corneal(moina) -> Peregrine(moina)\nforall x (Unashamed(x) -> Endergonic(x))\nforall x (Unvented(x) and Deflective(x) -> not Unashamed(x))\nnot Reliable(ardith) -> Deflective(ardith)\n\nnot Unashamed(moina)\n\nPeregrine(moina) and forall x (Peregrine(x) -> Reliable(x)) -> therefore Reliable(moina) Reliable(moina) and Reliable(moina) -> Unashamed(moina) -> therefore Unashamed(moina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Ernesto is not hypethral. King is not grassroots. King is delicious. King is favorite. King is hypethral. King is not verifying. King is famous. Tome is hypethral. Nariko is not ammino. Nariko is delicious. If someone is hypethral then they are ammino. If Tome is ammino then Tome is favorite. If Tome is ammino and Tome is not delicious then Tome is hypethral. All favorite people are famous. If someone is verifying and grassroots then they are not favorite. If King is not ammino then King is grassroots. Tome is famous.", "logic": "\nnot Hypethral(ernesto)\nnot Grassroots(king)\nDelicious(king)\nFavorite(king)\nHypethral(king)\nnot Verifying(king)\nFamous(king)\nHypethral(tome)\nnot Ammino(nariko)\nDelicious(nariko)\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> Ammino(x))\nAmmino(tome) -> Favorite(tome)\nAmmino(tome) and not Delicious(tome) -> Hypethral(tome)\nforall x (Favorite(x) -> Famous(x))\nforall x (Verifying(x) and Grassroots(x) -> not Favorite(x))\nnot Ammino(king) -> Grassroots(king)\n\nFamous(tome)\n\nHypethral(tome) and forall x (Hypethral(x) -> Ammino(x)) -> therefore Ammino(tome) Ammino(tome) and Ammino(tome) -> Favorite(tome) -> therefore Favorite(tome) Favorite(tome) and forall x (Favorite(x) -> Famous(x)) -> therefore Famous(tome)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Mayor is not worldwide. Rochelle is not spicy. Rochelle is pulpy. Rochelle is bully. Rochelle is worldwide. Rochelle is not untenable. Rochelle is unuttered. Charline is worldwide. Robert is not aurous. Robert is pulpy. If someone is worldwide then they are aurous. If Charline is aurous then Charline is bully. If Charline is aurous and Charline is not pulpy then Charline is worldwide. All bully people are unuttered. If someone is untenable and spicy then they are not bully. If Rochelle is not aurous then Rochelle is spicy. Charline is not unuttered.", "logic": "\nnot Worldwide(mayor)\nnot Spicy(rochelle)\nPulpy(rochelle)\nBully(rochelle)\nWorldwide(rochelle)\nnot Untenable(rochelle)\nUnuttered(rochelle)\nWorldwide(charline)\nnot Aurous(robert)\nPulpy(robert)\nforall x (Worldwide(x) -> Aurous(x))\nAurous(charline) -> Bully(charline)\nAurous(charline) and not Pulpy(charline) -> Worldwide(charline)\nforall x (Bully(x) -> Unuttered(x))\nforall x (Untenable(x) and Spicy(x) -> not Bully(x))\nnot Aurous(rochelle) -> Spicy(rochelle)\n\nnot Unuttered(charline)\n\nWorldwide(charline) and forall x (Worldwide(x) -> Aurous(x)) -> therefore Aurous(charline) Aurous(charline) and Aurous(charline) -> Bully(charline) -> therefore Bully(charline) Bully(charline) and forall x (Bully(x) -> Unuttered(x)) -> therefore Unuttered(charline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Nickolas is not antecedent. Etti is not predacious. Etti is fruiting. Etti is recessed. Etti is antecedent. Etti is not starkers. Etti is chinless. Julina is antecedent. Worden is not sudanese. Worden is fruiting. If someone is antecedent then they are sudanese. If Julina is sudanese then Julina is recessed. If Julina is sudanese and Julina is not fruiting then Julina is antecedent. All recessed people are chinless. If someone is starkers and predacious then they are not recessed. If Etti is not sudanese then Etti is predacious. Worden is not chinless.", "logic": "\nnot Antecedent(nickolas)\nnot Predacious(etti)\nFruiting(etti)\nRecessed(etti)\nAntecedent(etti)\nnot Starkers(etti)\nChinless(etti)\nAntecedent(julina)\nnot Sudanese(worden)\nFruiting(worden)\nforall x (Antecedent(x) -> Sudanese(x))\nSudanese(julina) -> Recessed(julina)\nSudanese(julina) and not Fruiting(julina) -> Antecedent(julina)\nforall x (Recessed(x) -> Chinless(x))\nforall x (Starkers(x) and Predacious(x) -> not Recessed(x))\nnot Sudanese(etti) -> Predacious(etti)\n\nnot Chinless(worden)\n\nforall x (Recessed(x) -> Chinless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Waneta is not voluminous. Cindelyn is not tenebrous. Cindelyn is collect. Cindelyn is aboulic. Cindelyn is voluminous. Cindelyn is not apothecial. Cindelyn is seventy. Rutger is voluminous. Isobel is not geologic. Isobel is collect. If someone is voluminous then they are geologic. If Rutger is geologic then Rutger is aboulic. If Rutger is geologic and Rutger is not collect then Rutger is voluminous. All aboulic people are seventy. If someone is apothecial and tenebrous then they are not aboulic. If Cindelyn is not geologic then Cindelyn is tenebrous. Waneta is geologic.", "logic": "\nnot Voluminous(waneta)\nnot Tenebrous(cindelyn)\nCollect(cindelyn)\nAboulic(cindelyn)\nVoluminous(cindelyn)\nnot Apothecial(cindelyn)\nSeventy(cindelyn)\nVoluminous(rutger)\nnot Geologic(isobel)\nCollect(isobel)\nforall x (Voluminous(x) -> Geologic(x))\nGeologic(rutger) -> Aboulic(rutger)\nGeologic(rutger) and not Collect(rutger) -> Voluminous(rutger)\nforall x (Aboulic(x) -> Seventy(x))\nforall x (Apothecial(x) and Tenebrous(x) -> not Aboulic(x))\nnot Geologic(cindelyn) -> Tenebrous(cindelyn)\n\nGeologic(waneta)\n\nforall x (Voluminous(x) -> Geologic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Freddie is not healed. Dyna is not astute. Dyna is unwearable. Dyna is muddied. Dyna is healed. Dyna is not longhand. Dyna is adverse. Elijah is healed. Dustin is not ectozoan. Dustin is unwearable. If someone is healed then they are ectozoan. If Elijah is ectozoan then Elijah is muddied. If Elijah is ectozoan and Elijah is not unwearable then Elijah is healed. All muddied people are adverse. If someone is longhand and astute then they are not muddied. If Dyna is not ectozoan then Dyna is astute. Freddie is not adverse.", "logic": "\nnot Healed(freddie)\nnot Astute(dyna)\nUnwearable(dyna)\nMuddied(dyna)\nHealed(dyna)\nnot Longhand(dyna)\nAdverse(dyna)\nHealed(elijah)\nnot Ectozoan(dustin)\nUnwearable(dustin)\nforall x (Healed(x) -> Ectozoan(x))\nEctozoan(elijah) -> Muddied(elijah)\nEctozoan(elijah) and not Unwearable(elijah) -> Healed(elijah)\nforall x (Muddied(x) -> Adverse(x))\nforall x (Longhand(x) and Astute(x) -> not Muddied(x))\nnot Ectozoan(dyna) -> Astute(dyna)\n\nnot Adverse(freddie)\n\nforall x (Muddied(x) -> Adverse(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Bailey is not trig. Maggi is not unworried. Maggi is modern. Maggi is tame. Maggi is trig. Maggi is not homegrown. Maggi is geodesic. Katherine is trig. Estella is not cloistral. Estella is modern. If someone is trig then they are cloistral. If Katherine is cloistral then Katherine is tame. If Katherine is cloistral and Katherine is not modern then Katherine is trig. All tame people are geodesic. If someone is homegrown and unworried then they are not tame. If Maggi is not cloistral then Maggi is unworried. Katherine is homegrown.", "logic": "\nnot Trig(bailey)\nnot Unworried(maggi)\nModern(maggi)\nTame(maggi)\nTrig(maggi)\nnot Homegrown(maggi)\nGeodesic(maggi)\nTrig(katherine)\nnot Cloistral(estella)\nModern(estella)\nforall x (Trig(x) -> Cloistral(x))\nCloistral(katherine) -> Tame(katherine)\nCloistral(katherine) and not Modern(katherine) -> Trig(katherine)\nforall x (Tame(x) -> Geodesic(x))\nforall x (Homegrown(x) and Unworried(x) -> not Tame(x))\nnot Cloistral(maggi) -> Unworried(maggi)\n\nHomegrown(katherine)\n\nHomegrown(katherine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Lavena is not creditable. Emilee is not unbrushed. Emilee is amicable. Emilee is sumptuous. Emilee is creditable. Emilee is not treeless. Emilee is allylic. Gino is creditable. Enoch is not ninepenny. Enoch is amicable. If someone is creditable then they are ninepenny. If Gino is ninepenny then Gino is sumptuous. If Gino is ninepenny and Gino is not amicable then Gino is creditable. All sumptuous people are allylic. If someone is treeless and unbrushed then they are not sumptuous. If Emilee is not ninepenny then Emilee is unbrushed. Enoch is not unbrushed.", "logic": "\nnot Creditable(lavena)\nnot Unbrushed(emilee)\nAmicable(emilee)\nSumptuous(emilee)\nCreditable(emilee)\nnot Treeless(emilee)\nAllylic(emilee)\nCreditable(gino)\nnot Ninepenny(enoch)\nAmicable(enoch)\nforall x (Creditable(x) -> Ninepenny(x))\nNinepenny(gino) -> Sumptuous(gino)\nNinepenny(gino) and not Amicable(gino) -> Creditable(gino)\nforall x (Sumptuous(x) -> Allylic(x))\nforall x (Treeless(x) and Unbrushed(x) -> not Sumptuous(x))\nnot Ninepenny(emilee) -> Unbrushed(emilee)\n\nnot Unbrushed(enoch)\n\nnot Unbrushed(enoch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Terrye is not indurate. Edita is not inanimate. Edita is risen. Edita is ruling. Edita is indurate. Edita is not maleficent. Edita is snorty. Radcliffe is indurate. Valeria is not trashy. Valeria is risen. If someone is indurate then they are trashy. If Radcliffe is trashy then Radcliffe is ruling. If Radcliffe is trashy and Radcliffe is not risen then Radcliffe is indurate. All ruling people are snorty. If someone is maleficent and inanimate then they are not ruling. If Edita is not trashy then Edita is inanimate. Valeria is maleficent.", "logic": "\nnot Indurate(terrye)\nnot Inanimate(edita)\nRisen(edita)\nRuling(edita)\nIndurate(edita)\nnot Maleficent(edita)\nSnorty(edita)\nIndurate(radcliffe)\nnot Trashy(valeria)\nRisen(valeria)\nforall x (Indurate(x) -> Trashy(x))\nTrashy(radcliffe) -> Ruling(radcliffe)\nTrashy(radcliffe) and not Risen(radcliffe) -> Indurate(radcliffe)\nforall x (Ruling(x) -> Snorty(x))\nforall x (Maleficent(x) and Inanimate(x) -> not Ruling(x))\nnot Trashy(edita) -> Inanimate(edita)\n\nMaleficent(valeria)\n\nMaleficent(valeria) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Emmalyn is not deviate. Janos is not subarctic. Janos is bouldered. Janos is inhibited. Janos is deviate. Janos is not medullated. Janos is stalinist. Darryl is deviate. Emmaline is not umpteen. Emmaline is bouldered. If someone is deviate then they are umpteen. If Darryl is umpteen then Darryl is inhibited. If Darryl is umpteen and Darryl is not bouldered then Darryl is deviate. All inhibited people are stalinist. If someone is medullated and subarctic then they are not inhibited. If Janos is not umpteen then Janos is subarctic. Emmalyn is not bouldered.", "logic": "\nnot Deviate(emmalyn)\nnot Subarctic(janos)\nBouldered(janos)\nInhibited(janos)\nDeviate(janos)\nnot Medullated(janos)\nStalinist(janos)\nDeviate(darryl)\nnot Umpteen(emmaline)\nBouldered(emmaline)\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Umpteen(x))\nUmpteen(darryl) -> Inhibited(darryl)\nUmpteen(darryl) and not Bouldered(darryl) -> Deviate(darryl)\nforall x (Inhibited(x) -> Stalinist(x))\nforall x (Medullated(x) and Subarctic(x) -> not Inhibited(x))\nnot Umpteen(janos) -> Subarctic(janos)\n\nnot Bouldered(emmalyn)\n\nnot Bouldered(emmalyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Lenny is not calm. Sanders is not majuscular. Sanders is lenient. Sanders is isothermic. Sanders is calm. Sanders is not brocaded. Sanders is overawed. Elwyn is calm. Olivie is not carpal. Olivie is lenient. If someone is calm then they are carpal. If Elwyn is carpal then Elwyn is isothermic. If Elwyn is carpal and Elwyn is not lenient then Elwyn is calm. All isothermic people are overawed. If someone is brocaded and majuscular then they are not isothermic. If Sanders is not carpal then Sanders is majuscular. Elwyn is lenient.", "logic": "\nnot Calm(lenny)\nnot Majuscular(sanders)\nLenient(sanders)\nIsothermic(sanders)\nCalm(sanders)\nnot Brocaded(sanders)\nOverawed(sanders)\nCalm(elwyn)\nnot Carpal(olivie)\nLenient(olivie)\nforall x (Calm(x) -> Carpal(x))\nCarpal(elwyn) -> Isothermic(elwyn)\nCarpal(elwyn) and not Lenient(elwyn) -> Calm(elwyn)\nforall x (Isothermic(x) -> Overawed(x))\nforall x (Brocaded(x) and Majuscular(x) -> not Isothermic(x))\nnot Carpal(sanders) -> Majuscular(sanders)\n\nLenient(elwyn)\n\nLenient(elwyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1048"} {"premises": "Rory is agonadal. Rory is humane. Rory is ceaseless. Rory is pending. Rory is dipylon. Rory is dogmatical. Clovis is agonadal. Clovis is humane. Clovis is grovelling. Clovis is ceaseless. Clovis is pending. Clovis is dipylon. Clovis is dogmatical. Henrique is agonadal. Henrique is dipylon. Henrique is dogmatical. Rough things are humane. If something is agonadal then it is dipylon. All ceaseless, dogmatical things are pending. If Henrique is dipylon then Henrique is grovelling. Round, dogmatical things are ceaseless. Big, humane things are pending. Henrique is dipylon.", "logic": "\nAgonadal(rory)\nHumane(rory)\nCeaseless(rory)\nPending(rory)\nDipylon(rory)\nDogmatical(rory)\nAgonadal(clovis)\nHumane(clovis)\nGrovelling(clovis)\nCeaseless(clovis)\nPending(clovis)\nDipylon(clovis)\nDogmatical(clovis)\nAgonadal(henrique)\nDipylon(henrique)\nDogmatical(henrique)\nforall x (Pending(x) -> Humane(x))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Ceaseless(x) and Dogmatical(x) -> Pending(x))\nDipylon(henrique) -> Grovelling(henrique)\nforall x (Dipylon(x) and Dogmatical(x) -> Ceaseless(x))\nforall x (Agonadal(x) and Humane(x) -> Pending(x))\n\nDipylon(henrique)\n\ntherefore Dipylon(henrique)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Carie is vacuous. Carie is inelegant. Carie is consummate. Carie is crenulated. Carie is jain. Carie is tomentous. Winne is vacuous. Winne is inelegant. Winne is bounderish. Winne is consummate. Winne is crenulated. Winne is jain. Winne is tomentous. Merilyn is vacuous. Merilyn is jain. Merilyn is tomentous. Rough things are inelegant. If something is vacuous then it is jain. All consummate, tomentous things are crenulated. If Merilyn is jain then Merilyn is bounderish. Round, tomentous things are consummate. Big, inelegant things are crenulated. Carie is not crenulated.", "logic": "\nVacuous(carie)\nInelegant(carie)\nConsummate(carie)\nCrenulated(carie)\nJain(carie)\nTomentous(carie)\nVacuous(winne)\nInelegant(winne)\nBounderish(winne)\nConsummate(winne)\nCrenulated(winne)\nJain(winne)\nTomentous(winne)\nVacuous(merilyn)\nJain(merilyn)\nTomentous(merilyn)\nforall x (Crenulated(x) -> Inelegant(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) -> Jain(x))\nforall x (Consummate(x) and Tomentous(x) -> Crenulated(x))\nJain(merilyn) -> Bounderish(merilyn)\nforall x (Jain(x) and Tomentous(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) and Inelegant(x) -> Crenulated(x))\n\nnot Crenulated(carie)\n\ntherefore Crenulated(carie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Felisha is miotic. Felisha is xxii. Felisha is weeny. Felisha is mingy. Felisha is allied. Felisha is intact. Silvain is miotic. Silvain is xxii. Silvain is inexpiable. Silvain is weeny. Silvain is mingy. Silvain is allied. Silvain is intact. Loralie is miotic. Loralie is allied. Loralie is intact. Rough things are xxii. If something is miotic then it is allied. All weeny, intact things are mingy. If Loralie is allied then Loralie is inexpiable. Round, intact things are weeny. Big, xxii things are mingy. Loralie is inexpiable.", "logic": "\nMiotic(felisha)\nXxii(felisha)\nWeeny(felisha)\nMingy(felisha)\nAllied(felisha)\nIntact(felisha)\nMiotic(silvain)\nXxii(silvain)\nInexpiable(silvain)\nWeeny(silvain)\nMingy(silvain)\nAllied(silvain)\nIntact(silvain)\nMiotic(loralie)\nAllied(loralie)\nIntact(loralie)\nforall x (Mingy(x) -> Xxii(x))\nforall x (Miotic(x) -> Allied(x))\nforall x (Weeny(x) and Intact(x) -> Mingy(x))\nAllied(loralie) -> Inexpiable(loralie)\nforall x (Allied(x) and Intact(x) -> Weeny(x))\nforall x (Miotic(x) and Xxii(x) -> Mingy(x))\n\nInexpiable(loralie)\n\nAllied(loralie) and Allied(loralie) -> Inexpiable(loralie) -> therefore Inexpiable(loralie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Jeniffer is prototypal. Jeniffer is uncreased. Jeniffer is trilled. Jeniffer is iliac. Jeniffer is benzoic. Jeniffer is funny. Carey is prototypal. Carey is uncreased. Carey is craven. Carey is trilled. Carey is iliac. Carey is benzoic. Carey is funny. Ricky is prototypal. Ricky is benzoic. Ricky is funny. Rough things are uncreased. If something is prototypal then it is benzoic. All trilled, funny things are iliac. If Ricky is benzoic then Ricky is craven. Round, funny things are trilled. Big, uncreased things are iliac. Ricky is not trilled.", "logic": "\nPrototypal(jeniffer)\nUncreased(jeniffer)\nTrilled(jeniffer)\nIliac(jeniffer)\nBenzoic(jeniffer)\nFunny(jeniffer)\nPrototypal(carey)\nUncreased(carey)\nCraven(carey)\nTrilled(carey)\nIliac(carey)\nBenzoic(carey)\nFunny(carey)\nPrototypal(ricky)\nBenzoic(ricky)\nFunny(ricky)\nforall x (Iliac(x) -> Uncreased(x))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) -> Benzoic(x))\nforall x (Trilled(x) and Funny(x) -> Iliac(x))\nBenzoic(ricky) -> Craven(ricky)\nforall x (Benzoic(x) and Funny(x) -> Trilled(x))\nforall x (Prototypal(x) and Uncreased(x) -> Iliac(x))\n\nnot Trilled(ricky)\n\nBenzoic(ricky) and Funny(ricky) and forall x (Benzoic(x) and Funny(x) -> Trilled(x)) -> therefore Trilled(ricky)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Sacha is mushy. Sacha is failing. Sacha is metastable. Sacha is sensual. Sacha is single. Sacha is colorless. Lisetta is mushy. Lisetta is failing. Lisetta is secretory. Lisetta is metastable. Lisetta is sensual. Lisetta is single. Lisetta is colorless. Gerard is mushy. Gerard is single. Gerard is colorless. Rough things are failing. If something is mushy then it is single. All metastable, colorless things are sensual. If Gerard is single then Gerard is secretory. Round, colorless things are metastable. Big, failing things are sensual. Gerard is sensual.", "logic": "\nMushy(sacha)\nFailing(sacha)\nMetastable(sacha)\nSensual(sacha)\nSingle(sacha)\nColorless(sacha)\nMushy(lisetta)\nFailing(lisetta)\nSecretory(lisetta)\nMetastable(lisetta)\nSensual(lisetta)\nSingle(lisetta)\nColorless(lisetta)\nMushy(gerard)\nSingle(gerard)\nColorless(gerard)\nforall x (Sensual(x) -> Failing(x))\nforall x (Mushy(x) -> Single(x))\nforall x (Metastable(x) and Colorless(x) -> Sensual(x))\nSingle(gerard) -> Secretory(gerard)\nforall x (Single(x) and Colorless(x) -> Metastable(x))\nforall x (Mushy(x) and Failing(x) -> Sensual(x))\n\nSensual(gerard)\n\nSingle(gerard) and Colorless(gerard) and forall x (Single(x) and Colorless(x) -> Metastable(x)) -> therefore Metastable(gerard) Metastable(gerard) and Colorless(gerard) and forall x (Metastable(x) and Colorless(x) -> Sensual(x)) -> therefore Sensual(gerard)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Jeth is panoptical. Jeth is rancorous. Jeth is unwrinkled. Jeth is notorious. Jeth is bursal. Jeth is thwarted. Stephie is panoptical. Stephie is rancorous. Stephie is synoecious. Stephie is unwrinkled. Stephie is notorious. Stephie is bursal. Stephie is thwarted. Kass is panoptical. Kass is bursal. Kass is thwarted. Rough things are rancorous. If something is panoptical then it is bursal. All unwrinkled, thwarted things are notorious. If Kass is bursal then Kass is synoecious. Round, thwarted things are unwrinkled. Big, rancorous things are notorious. Kass is not notorious.", "logic": "\nPanoptical(jeth)\nRancorous(jeth)\nUnwrinkled(jeth)\nNotorious(jeth)\nBursal(jeth)\nThwarted(jeth)\nPanoptical(stephie)\nRancorous(stephie)\nSynoecious(stephie)\nUnwrinkled(stephie)\nNotorious(stephie)\nBursal(stephie)\nThwarted(stephie)\nPanoptical(kass)\nBursal(kass)\nThwarted(kass)\nforall x (Notorious(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) -> Bursal(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) and Thwarted(x) -> Notorious(x))\nBursal(kass) -> Synoecious(kass)\nforall x (Bursal(x) and Thwarted(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Panoptical(x) and Rancorous(x) -> Notorious(x))\n\nnot Notorious(kass)\n\nBursal(kass) and Thwarted(kass) and forall x (Bursal(x) and Thwarted(x) -> Unwrinkled(x)) -> therefore Unwrinkled(kass) Unwrinkled(kass) and Thwarted(kass) and forall x (Unwrinkled(x) and Thwarted(x) -> Notorious(x)) -> therefore Notorious(kass)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Justine is boring. Justine is seaward. Justine is anomalous. Justine is shorthand. Justine is conjugated. Justine is overhasty. Lorine is boring. Lorine is seaward. Lorine is extra. Lorine is anomalous. Lorine is shorthand. Lorine is conjugated. Lorine is overhasty. Velvet is boring. Velvet is conjugated. Velvet is overhasty. Rough things are seaward. If something is boring then it is conjugated. All anomalous, overhasty things are shorthand. If Velvet is conjugated then Velvet is extra. Round, overhasty things are anomalous. Big, seaward things are shorthand. Velvet is seaward.", "logic": "\nBoring(justine)\nSeaward(justine)\nAnomalous(justine)\nShorthand(justine)\nConjugated(justine)\nOverhasty(justine)\nBoring(lorine)\nSeaward(lorine)\nExtra(lorine)\nAnomalous(lorine)\nShorthand(lorine)\nConjugated(lorine)\nOverhasty(lorine)\nBoring(velvet)\nConjugated(velvet)\nOverhasty(velvet)\nforall x (Shorthand(x) -> Seaward(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) -> Conjugated(x))\nforall x (Anomalous(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Shorthand(x))\nConjugated(velvet) -> Extra(velvet)\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Anomalous(x))\nforall x (Boring(x) and Seaward(x) -> Shorthand(x))\n\nSeaward(velvet)\n\nConjugated(velvet) and Overhasty(velvet) and forall x (Conjugated(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Anomalous(x)) -> therefore Anomalous(velvet) Anomalous(velvet) and Overhasty(velvet) and forall x (Anomalous(x) and Overhasty(x) -> Shorthand(x)) -> therefore Shorthand(velvet) Shorthand(velvet) and forall x (Shorthand(x) -> Seaward(x)) -> therefore Seaward(velvet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "Ophelia is celibate. Ophelia is fanged. Ophelia is humbled. Ophelia is ascendent. Ophelia is philippine. Ophelia is sleeping. Dennis is celibate. Dennis is fanged. Dennis is scriptural. Dennis is humbled. Dennis is ascendent. Dennis is philippine. Dennis is sleeping. Oswald is celibate. Oswald is philippine. Oswald is sleeping. Rough things are fanged. If something is celibate then it is philippine. All humbled, sleeping things are ascendent. If Oswald is philippine then Oswald is scriptural. Round, sleeping things are humbled. Big, fanged things are ascendent. Oswald is not fanged.", "logic": "\nCelibate(ophelia)\nFanged(ophelia)\nHumbled(ophelia)\nAscendent(ophelia)\nPhilippine(ophelia)\nSleeping(ophelia)\nCelibate(dennis)\nFanged(dennis)\nScriptural(dennis)\nHumbled(dennis)\nAscendent(dennis)\nPhilippine(dennis)\nSleeping(dennis)\nCelibate(oswald)\nPhilippine(oswald)\nSleeping(oswald)\nforall x (Ascendent(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Celibate(x) -> Philippine(x))\nforall x (Humbled(x) and Sleeping(x) -> Ascendent(x))\nPhilippine(oswald) -> Scriptural(oswald)\nforall x (Philippine(x) and Sleeping(x) -> Humbled(x))\nforall x (Celibate(x) and Fanged(x) -> Ascendent(x))\n\nnot Fanged(oswald)\n\nPhilippine(oswald) and Sleeping(oswald) and forall x (Philippine(x) and Sleeping(x) -> Humbled(x)) -> therefore Humbled(oswald) Humbled(oswald) and Sleeping(oswald) and forall x (Humbled(x) and Sleeping(x) -> Ascendent(x)) -> therefore Ascendent(oswald) Ascendent(oswald) and forall x (Ascendent(x) -> Fanged(x)) -> therefore Fanged(oswald)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-559"} {"premises": "The dion is biparous. The dion is classic. The dion is arsenical. The dion is unwomanly. The dion is hooklike. The dion featherbed the elisa. The dion gallop the elisa. The dion does not see the elisa. The elisa is biparous. The elisa is classic. The elisa is arsenical. The elisa is unwomanly. The elisa is hooklike. The elisa does not like the dion. The elisa does not need the dion. The elisa collimate the dion. If something gallop the elisa then the elisa does not like the dion. If something is biparous then it collimate the dion. If something gallop the elisa and it does not see the dion then it featherbed the elisa. The elisa is hooklike.", "logic": "\nBiparous(dion)\nClassic(dion)\nArsenical(dion)\nUnwomanly(dion)\nHooklike(dion)\nFeatherbed(dion, elisa)\nGallop(dion, elisa)\nnot Collimate(dion, elisa)\nBiparous(elisa)\nClassic(elisa)\nArsenical(elisa)\nUnwomanly(elisa)\nHooklike(elisa)\nnot Featherbed(elisa, dion)\nnot Gallop(elisa, dion)\nCollimate(elisa, dion)\nforall x (Gallop(x, elisa) -> not Featherbed(elisa, dion))\nforall x (Biparous(x) -> Collimate(x, dion))\nforall x (Gallop(x, elisa) and not Collimate(x, dion) -> Featherbed(x, elisa))\n\nHooklike(elisa)\n\ntherefore Hooklike(elisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "The rajeev is excrescent. The rajeev is bogus. The rajeev is discharged. The rajeev is inept. The rajeev is combinable. The rajeev opsonize the constanta. The rajeev assay the constanta. The rajeev does not see the constanta. The constanta is excrescent. The constanta is bogus. The constanta is discharged. The constanta is inept. The constanta is combinable. The constanta does not like the rajeev. The constanta does not need the rajeev. The constanta pique the rajeev. If something assay the constanta then the constanta does not like the rajeev. If something is excrescent then it pique the rajeev. If something assay the constanta and it does not see the rajeev then it opsonize the constanta. The constanta is not bogus.", "logic": "\nExcrescent(rajeev)\nBogus(rajeev)\nDischarged(rajeev)\nInept(rajeev)\nCombinable(rajeev)\nOpsonize(rajeev, constanta)\nAssay(rajeev, constanta)\nnot Pique(rajeev, constanta)\nExcrescent(constanta)\nBogus(constanta)\nDischarged(constanta)\nInept(constanta)\nCombinable(constanta)\nnot Opsonize(constanta, rajeev)\nnot Assay(constanta, rajeev)\nPique(constanta, rajeev)\nforall x (Assay(x, constanta) -> not Opsonize(constanta, rajeev))\nforall x (Excrescent(x) -> Pique(x, rajeev))\nforall x (Assay(x, constanta) and not Pique(x, rajeev) -> Opsonize(x, constanta))\n\nnot Bogus(constanta)\n\ntherefore Bogus(constanta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "The ileane is hanoverian. The ileane is dressed. The ileane is innoxious. The ileane is taiwanese. The ileane is orthodox. The ileane network the mel. The ileane alkalise the mel. The ileane does not see the mel. The mel is hanoverian. The mel is dressed. The mel is innoxious. The mel is taiwanese. The mel is orthodox. The mel does not like the ileane. The mel does not need the ileane. The mel amortise the ileane. If something alkalise the mel then the mel does not like the ileane. If something is hanoverian then it amortise the ileane. If something alkalise the mel and it does not see the ileane then it network the mel. The ileane amortise the ileane.", "logic": "\nHanoverian(ileane)\nDressed(ileane)\nInnoxious(ileane)\nTaiwanese(ileane)\nOrthodox(ileane)\nNetwork(ileane, mel)\nAlkalise(ileane, mel)\nnot Amortise(ileane, mel)\nHanoverian(mel)\nDressed(mel)\nInnoxious(mel)\nTaiwanese(mel)\nOrthodox(mel)\nnot Network(mel, ileane)\nnot Alkalise(mel, ileane)\nAmortise(mel, ileane)\nforall x (Alkalise(x, mel) -> not Network(mel, ileane))\nforall x (Hanoverian(x) -> Amortise(x, ileane))\nforall x (Alkalise(x, mel) and not Amortise(x, ileane) -> Network(x, mel))\n\nAmortise(ileane, ileane)\n\nHanoverian(ileane) and forall x (Hanoverian(x) -> Amortise(x, ileane)) -> therefore Amortise(ileane, ileane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "The filipe is lxxxiii. The filipe is unsized. The filipe is moonless. The filipe is roving. The filipe is raiseable. The filipe ornament the skipper. The filipe uncloak the skipper. The filipe does not see the skipper. The skipper is lxxxiii. The skipper is unsized. The skipper is moonless. The skipper is roving. The skipper is raiseable. The skipper does not like the filipe. The skipper does not need the filipe. The skipper levy the filipe. If something uncloak the skipper then the skipper does not like the filipe. If something is lxxxiii then it levy the filipe. If something uncloak the skipper and it does not see the filipe then it ornament the skipper. The filipe does not see the filipe.", "logic": "\nLxxxiii(filipe)\nUnsized(filipe)\nMoonless(filipe)\nRoving(filipe)\nRaiseable(filipe)\nOrnament(filipe, skipper)\nUncloak(filipe, skipper)\nnot Levy(filipe, skipper)\nLxxxiii(skipper)\nUnsized(skipper)\nMoonless(skipper)\nRoving(skipper)\nRaiseable(skipper)\nnot Ornament(skipper, filipe)\nnot Uncloak(skipper, filipe)\nLevy(skipper, filipe)\nforall x (Uncloak(x, skipper) -> not Ornament(skipper, filipe))\nforall x (Lxxxiii(x) -> Levy(x, filipe))\nforall x (Uncloak(x, skipper) and not Levy(x, filipe) -> Ornament(x, skipper))\n\nnot Levy(filipe, filipe)\n\nLxxxiii(filipe) and forall x (Lxxxiii(x) -> Levy(x, filipe)) -> therefore Levy(filipe, filipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "The denis is declared. The denis is adherent. The denis is scopal. The denis is polish. The denis is ablated. The denis naturalise the aurelie. The denis fiddle the aurelie. The denis does not see the aurelie. The aurelie is declared. The aurelie is adherent. The aurelie is scopal. The aurelie is polish. The aurelie is ablated. The aurelie does not like the denis. The aurelie does not need the denis. The aurelie daze the denis. If something fiddle the aurelie then the aurelie does not like the denis. If something is declared then it daze the denis. If something fiddle the aurelie and it does not see the denis then it naturalise the aurelie. The aurelie does not like the aurelie.", "logic": "\nDeclared(denis)\nAdherent(denis)\nScopal(denis)\nPolish(denis)\nAblated(denis)\nNaturalise(denis, aurelie)\nFiddle(denis, aurelie)\nnot Daze(denis, aurelie)\nDeclared(aurelie)\nAdherent(aurelie)\nScopal(aurelie)\nPolish(aurelie)\nAblated(aurelie)\nnot Naturalise(aurelie, denis)\nnot Fiddle(aurelie, denis)\nDaze(aurelie, denis)\nforall x (Fiddle(x, aurelie) -> not Naturalise(aurelie, denis))\nforall x (Declared(x) -> Daze(x, denis))\nforall x (Fiddle(x, aurelie) and not Daze(x, denis) -> Naturalise(x, aurelie))\n\nnot Naturalise(aurelie, aurelie)\n\nforall x (Fiddle(x, aurelie) and not Daze(x, denis) -> Naturalise(x, aurelie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "The jay is bicornuate. The jay is nonsexual. The jay is unable. The jay is horny. The jay is daredevil. The jay bound the charlotta. The jay present the charlotta. The jay does not see the charlotta. The charlotta is bicornuate. The charlotta is nonsexual. The charlotta is unable. The charlotta is horny. The charlotta is daredevil. The charlotta does not like the jay. The charlotta does not need the jay. The charlotta sanitate the jay. If something present the charlotta then the charlotta does not like the jay. If something is bicornuate then it sanitate the jay. If something present the charlotta and it does not see the jay then it bound the charlotta. The jay bound the jay.", "logic": "\nBicornuate(jay)\nNonsexual(jay)\nUnable(jay)\nHorny(jay)\nDaredevil(jay)\nBound(jay, charlotta)\nPresent(jay, charlotta)\nnot Sanitate(jay, charlotta)\nBicornuate(charlotta)\nNonsexual(charlotta)\nUnable(charlotta)\nHorny(charlotta)\nDaredevil(charlotta)\nnot Bound(charlotta, jay)\nnot Present(charlotta, jay)\nSanitate(charlotta, jay)\nforall x (Present(x, charlotta) -> not Bound(charlotta, jay))\nforall x (Bicornuate(x) -> Sanitate(x, jay))\nforall x (Present(x, charlotta) and not Sanitate(x, jay) -> Bound(x, charlotta))\n\nBound(jay, jay)\n\nBound(jay, jay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "The spencer is motherlike. The spencer is riotous. The spencer is ferned. The spencer is soluble. The spencer is unendowed. The spencer transact the blaire. The spencer frizz the blaire. The spencer does not see the blaire. The blaire is motherlike. The blaire is riotous. The blaire is ferned. The blaire is soluble. The blaire is unendowed. The blaire does not like the spencer. The blaire does not need the spencer. The blaire mist the spencer. If something frizz the blaire then the blaire does not like the spencer. If something is motherlike then it mist the spencer. If something frizz the blaire and it does not see the spencer then it transact the blaire. The blaire does not see the blaire.", "logic": "\nMotherlike(spencer)\nRiotous(spencer)\nFerned(spencer)\nSoluble(spencer)\nUnendowed(spencer)\nTransact(spencer, blaire)\nFrizz(spencer, blaire)\nnot Mist(spencer, blaire)\nMotherlike(blaire)\nRiotous(blaire)\nFerned(blaire)\nSoluble(blaire)\nUnendowed(blaire)\nnot Transact(blaire, spencer)\nnot Frizz(blaire, spencer)\nMist(blaire, spencer)\nforall x (Frizz(x, blaire) -> not Transact(blaire, spencer))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Mist(x, spencer))\nforall x (Frizz(x, blaire) and not Mist(x, spencer) -> Transact(x, blaire))\n\nnot Mist(blaire, blaire)\n\nnot Mist(blaire, blaire) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "The jennica is vaulting. The jennica is singhalese. The jennica is swaggering. The jennica is past. The jennica is semiformal. The jennica overtax the sofia. The jennica flavour the sofia. The jennica does not see the sofia. The sofia is vaulting. The sofia is singhalese. The sofia is swaggering. The sofia is past. The sofia is semiformal. The sofia does not like the jennica. The sofia does not need the jennica. The sofia settle the jennica. If something flavour the sofia then the sofia does not like the jennica. If something is vaulting then it settle the jennica. If something flavour the sofia and it does not see the jennica then it overtax the sofia. The jennica flavour the jennica.", "logic": "\nVaulting(jennica)\nSinghalese(jennica)\nSwaggering(jennica)\nPast(jennica)\nSemiformal(jennica)\nOvertax(jennica, sofia)\nFlavour(jennica, sofia)\nnot Settle(jennica, sofia)\nVaulting(sofia)\nSinghalese(sofia)\nSwaggering(sofia)\nPast(sofia)\nSemiformal(sofia)\nnot Overtax(sofia, jennica)\nnot Flavour(sofia, jennica)\nSettle(sofia, jennica)\nforall x (Flavour(x, sofia) -> not Overtax(sofia, jennica))\nforall x (Vaulting(x) -> Settle(x, jennica))\nforall x (Flavour(x, sofia) and not Settle(x, jennica) -> Overtax(x, sofia))\n\nFlavour(jennica, jennica)\n\nFlavour(jennica, jennica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D1-1467"} {"premises": "Rabbi is insulting. Rabbi is ennobling. Chrissy is ennobling. All insulting things are buried. If something is misrelated and ennobling then it is buried. Blue things are buried. All ennobling things are insulting. If something is misrelated then it is altruistic. If something is insulting then it is misrelated. All ennobling things are not clammy. All insulting things are not cerous. Rabbi is ennobling.", "logic": "\nInsulting(rabbi)\nEnnobling(rabbi)\nEnnobling(chrissy)\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Buried(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) and Ennobling(x) -> Buried(x))\nforall x (Clammy(x) -> Buried(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) -> Insulting(x))\nforall x (Misrelated(x) -> Altruistic(x))\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> Misrelated(x))\nforall x (Ennobling(x) -> not Clammy(x))\nforall x (Insulting(x) -> not Cerous(x))\n\nEnnobling(rabbi)\n\ntherefore Ennobling(rabbi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Cleva is bigger. Cleva is disputed. Zarah is disputed. All bigger things are executable. If something is faint and disputed then it is executable. Blue things are executable. All disputed things are bigger. If something is faint then it is sturdy. If something is bigger then it is faint. All disputed things are not placeable. All bigger things are not impersonal. Cleva is not disputed.", "logic": "\nBigger(cleva)\nDisputed(cleva)\nDisputed(zarah)\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) and Disputed(x) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Placeable(x) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Disputed(x) -> Bigger(x))\nforall x (Faint(x) -> Sturdy(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Faint(x))\nforall x (Disputed(x) -> not Placeable(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> not Impersonal(x))\n\nnot Disputed(cleva)\n\ntherefore Disputed(cleva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Ashely is shopsoiled. Ashely is leaning. Randi is leaning. All shopsoiled things are nonsexual. If something is unraised and leaning then it is nonsexual. Blue things are nonsexual. All leaning things are shopsoiled. If something is unraised then it is typical. If something is shopsoiled then it is unraised. All leaning things are not sorted. All shopsoiled things are not allylic. Ashely is not sorted.", "logic": "\nShopsoiled(ashely)\nLeaning(ashely)\nLeaning(randi)\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) and Leaning(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Sorted(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Leaning(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Unraised(x) -> Typical(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Unraised(x))\nforall x (Leaning(x) -> not Sorted(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> not Allylic(x))\n\nnot Sorted(ashely)\n\nLeaning(ashely) and forall x (Leaning(x) -> not Sorted(x)) -> therefore not Sorted(ashely)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Carmelina is done. Carmelina is caseous. Marylou is caseous. All done things are cloaked. If something is belittled and caseous then it is cloaked. Blue things are cloaked. All caseous things are done. If something is belittled then it is canonized. If something is done then it is belittled. All caseous things are not copacetic. All done things are not thrown. Marylou is not done.", "logic": "\nDone(carmelina)\nCaseous(carmelina)\nCaseous(marylou)\nforall x (Done(x) -> Cloaked(x))\nforall x (Belittled(x) and Caseous(x) -> Cloaked(x))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> Cloaked(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) -> Done(x))\nforall x (Belittled(x) -> Canonized(x))\nforall x (Done(x) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Caseous(x) -> not Copacetic(x))\nforall x (Done(x) -> not Thrown(x))\n\nnot Done(marylou)\n\nCaseous(marylou) and forall x (Caseous(x) -> Done(x)) -> therefore Done(marylou)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Vinita is vented. Vinita is normal. Emma is normal. All vented things are abscessed. If something is leaded and normal then it is abscessed. Blue things are abscessed. All normal things are vented. If something is leaded then it is nonslip. If something is vented then it is leaded. All normal things are not archaic. All vented things are not setose. Emma is abscessed.", "logic": "\nVented(vinita)\nNormal(vinita)\nNormal(emma)\nforall x (Vented(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Leaded(x) and Normal(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Archaic(x) -> Abscessed(x))\nforall x (Normal(x) -> Vented(x))\nforall x (Leaded(x) -> Nonslip(x))\nforall x (Vented(x) -> Leaded(x))\nforall x (Normal(x) -> not Archaic(x))\nforall x (Vented(x) -> not Setose(x))\n\nAbscessed(emma)\n\nNormal(emma) and forall x (Normal(x) -> Vented(x)) -> therefore Vented(emma) Vented(emma) and forall x (Vented(x) -> Abscessed(x)) -> therefore Abscessed(emma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Witty is semilunar. Witty is libelous. Jacintha is libelous. All semilunar things are depleted. If something is aphaeretic and libelous then it is depleted. Blue things are depleted. All libelous things are semilunar. If something is aphaeretic then it is faced. If something is semilunar then it is aphaeretic. All libelous things are not tripartite. All semilunar things are not unoriginal. Jacintha is not depleted.", "logic": "\nSemilunar(witty)\nLibelous(witty)\nLibelous(jacintha)\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Aphaeretic(x) and Libelous(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> Semilunar(x))\nforall x (Aphaeretic(x) -> Faced(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> Aphaeretic(x))\nforall x (Libelous(x) -> not Tripartite(x))\nforall x (Semilunar(x) -> not Unoriginal(x))\n\nnot Depleted(jacintha)\n\nLibelous(jacintha) and forall x (Libelous(x) -> Semilunar(x)) -> therefore Semilunar(jacintha) Semilunar(jacintha) and forall x (Semilunar(x) -> Depleted(x)) -> therefore Depleted(jacintha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Dalenna is expanded. Dalenna is isthmian. Cathyleen is isthmian. All expanded things are pharyngeal. If something is protrusive and isthmian then it is pharyngeal. Blue things are pharyngeal. All isthmian things are expanded. If something is protrusive then it is tactful. If something is expanded then it is protrusive. All isthmian things are not beamy. All expanded things are not meshugge. Cathyleen is tactful.", "logic": "\nExpanded(dalenna)\nIsthmian(dalenna)\nIsthmian(cathyleen)\nforall x (Expanded(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) and Isthmian(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Beamy(x) -> Pharyngeal(x))\nforall x (Isthmian(x) -> Expanded(x))\nforall x (Protrusive(x) -> Tactful(x))\nforall x (Expanded(x) -> Protrusive(x))\nforall x (Isthmian(x) -> not Beamy(x))\nforall x (Expanded(x) -> not Meshugge(x))\n\nTactful(cathyleen)\n\nIsthmian(cathyleen) and forall x (Isthmian(x) -> Expanded(x)) -> therefore Expanded(cathyleen) Expanded(cathyleen) and forall x (Expanded(x) -> Protrusive(x)) -> therefore Protrusive(cathyleen) Protrusive(cathyleen) and forall x (Protrusive(x) -> Tactful(x)) -> therefore Tactful(cathyleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "Shellie is oddish. Shellie is harassed. Lamont is harassed. All oddish things are unfattened. If something is yelled and harassed then it is unfattened. Blue things are unfattened. All harassed things are oddish. If something is yelled then it is absent. If something is oddish then it is yelled. All harassed things are not allylic. All oddish things are not scared. Lamont is not absent.", "logic": "\nOddish(shellie)\nHarassed(shellie)\nHarassed(lamont)\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nforall x (Yelled(x) and Harassed(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nforall x (Allylic(x) -> Unfattened(x))\nforall x (Harassed(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Yelled(x) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> Yelled(x))\nforall x (Harassed(x) -> not Allylic(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) -> not Scared(x))\n\nnot Absent(lamont)\n\nHarassed(lamont) and forall x (Harassed(x) -> Oddish(x)) -> therefore Oddish(lamont) Oddish(lamont) and forall x (Oddish(x) -> Yelled(x)) -> therefore Yelled(lamont) Yelled(lamont) and forall x (Yelled(x) -> Absent(x)) -> therefore Absent(lamont)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1013"} {"premises": "The mitch is branching. The marysa dull the mahala. The marysa is branching. The marysa rescind the mitch. The marysa rescind the mahala. The marysa police the mitch. The mahala rescind the mitch. If someone police the marysa then they visit the mitch. If someone rescind the marysa and they like the mahala then the marysa is purging. If the marysa is unsaddled and the marysa rescind the mahala then the mahala rescind the mitch. If someone is connected and they visit the marysa then the marysa is bismuthic. All branching people are purging. If someone police the marysa then the marysa dull the mitch. The mahala rescind the mitch.", "logic": "\nBranching(mitch)\nDull(marysa, mahala)\nBranching(marysa)\nRescind(marysa, mitch)\nRescind(marysa, mahala)\nPolice(marysa, mitch)\nRescind(mahala, mitch)\nforall x (Police(x, marysa) -> Police(x, mitch))\nforall x (Rescind(x, marysa) and Rescind(x, mahala) -> Purging(marysa))\nUnsaddled(marysa) and Rescind(marysa, mahala) -> Rescind(mahala, mitch)\nforall x (Connected(x) and Police(x, marysa) -> Bismuthic(marysa))\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Police(x, marysa) -> Dull(marysa, mitch))\n\nRescind(mahala, mitch)\n\ntherefore Rescind(mahala, mitch)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3303"} {"premises": "The samantha is mensal. The romeo armor the tilda. The romeo is mensal. The romeo shank the samantha. The romeo shank the tilda. The romeo forgather the samantha. The tilda shank the samantha. If someone forgather the romeo then they visit the samantha. If someone shank the romeo and they like the tilda then the romeo is unspaced. If the romeo is saucy and the romeo shank the tilda then the tilda shank the samantha. If someone is unethical and they visit the romeo then the romeo is revocable. All mensal people are unspaced. If someone forgather the romeo then the romeo armor the samantha. The romeo does not like the samantha.", "logic": "\nMensal(samantha)\nArmor(romeo, tilda)\nMensal(romeo)\nShank(romeo, samantha)\nShank(romeo, tilda)\nForgather(romeo, samantha)\nShank(tilda, samantha)\nforall x (Forgather(x, romeo) -> Forgather(x, samantha))\nforall x (Shank(x, romeo) and Shank(x, tilda) -> Unspaced(romeo))\nSaucy(romeo) and Shank(romeo, tilda) -> Shank(tilda, samantha)\nforall x (Unethical(x) and Forgather(x, romeo) -> Revocable(romeo))\nforall x (Mensal(x) -> Unspaced(x))\nforall x (Forgather(x, romeo) -> Armor(romeo, samantha))\n\nnot Shank(romeo, samantha)\n\ntherefore Shank(romeo, samantha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3303"} {"premises": "The barron is solidified. The bria bear the jerzy. The bria is solidified. The bria brail the barron. The bria brail the jerzy. The bria scorch the barron. The jerzy brail the barron. If someone scorch the bria then they visit the barron. If someone brail the bria and they like the jerzy then the bria is resistless. If the bria is openhanded and the bria brail the jerzy then the jerzy brail the barron. If someone is inhumane and they visit the bria then the bria is regulation. All solidified people are resistless. If someone scorch the bria then the bria bear the barron. The barron does not visit the barron.", "logic": "\nSolidified(barron)\nBear(bria, jerzy)\nSolidified(bria)\nBrail(bria, barron)\nBrail(bria, jerzy)\nScorch(bria, barron)\nBrail(jerzy, barron)\nforall x (Scorch(x, bria) -> Scorch(x, barron))\nforall x (Brail(x, bria) and Brail(x, jerzy) -> Resistless(bria))\nOpenhanded(bria) and Brail(bria, jerzy) -> Brail(jerzy, barron)\nforall x (Inhumane(x) and Scorch(x, bria) -> Regulation(bria))\nforall x (Solidified(x) -> Resistless(x))\nforall x (Scorch(x, bria) -> Bear(bria, barron))\n\nnot Scorch(barron, barron)\n\nforall x (Scorch(x, bria) -> Scorch(x, barron)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3303"} {"premises": "The loralee is hydraulic. The rich unionize the raf. The rich is hydraulic. The rich renew the loralee. The rich renew the raf. The rich cruise the loralee. The raf renew the loralee. If someone cruise the rich then they visit the loralee. If someone renew the rich and they like the raf then the rich is downwind. If the rich is cutting and the rich renew the raf then the raf renew the loralee. If someone is seventeen and they visit the rich then the rich is tagged. All hydraulic people are downwind. If someone cruise the rich then the rich unionize the loralee. The raf is hydraulic.", "logic": "\nHydraulic(loralee)\nUnionize(rich, raf)\nHydraulic(rich)\nRenew(rich, loralee)\nRenew(rich, raf)\nCruise(rich, loralee)\nRenew(raf, loralee)\nforall x (Cruise(x, rich) -> Cruise(x, loralee))\nforall x (Renew(x, rich) and Renew(x, raf) -> Downwind(rich))\nCutting(rich) and Renew(rich, raf) -> Renew(raf, loralee)\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and Cruise(x, rich) -> Tagged(rich))\nforall x (Hydraulic(x) -> Downwind(x))\nforall x (Cruise(x, rich) -> Unionize(rich, loralee))\n\nHydraulic(raf)\n\nHydraulic(raf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3303"} {"premises": "Nestor is not insatiate. Nestor is boughed. Farrah is epistemic. Farrah is not insatiate. Farrah is not untethered. Farrah is boughed. Jory is boughed. Bart is dyed. Bart is untethered. Bart is boughed. Round things are lawless. Nice things are lawless. If something is epistemic and not untethered then it is lawless. If Jory is insatiate and Jory is boughed then Jory is contorted. If something is lawless then it is epistemic. If something is epistemic and untethered then it is not contorted. If something is contorted and untethered then it is not boughed. Furry things are boughed. Bart is dyed.", "logic": "\nnot Insatiate(nestor)\nBoughed(nestor)\nEpistemic(farrah)\nnot Insatiate(farrah)\nnot Untethered(farrah)\nBoughed(farrah)\nBoughed(jory)\nDyed(bart)\nUntethered(bart)\nBoughed(bart)\nforall x (Boughed(x) -> Lawless(x))\nforall x (Dyed(x) -> Lawless(x))\nforall x (Epistemic(x) and not Untethered(x) -> Lawless(x))\nInsatiate(jory) and Boughed(jory) -> Contorted(jory)\nforall x (Lawless(x) -> Epistemic(x))\nforall x (Epistemic(x) and Untethered(x) -> not Contorted(x))\nforall x (Contorted(x) and Untethered(x) -> not Boughed(x))\nforall x (Lawless(x) -> Boughed(x))\n\nDyed(bart)\n\ntherefore Dyed(bart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Phillie is not korean. Phillie is bone. Karita is navicular. Karita is not korean. Karita is not dioecian. Karita is bone. Sutton is bone. Phip is conducive. Phip is dioecian. Phip is bone. Round things are tawdry. Nice things are tawdry. If something is navicular and not dioecian then it is tawdry. If Sutton is korean and Sutton is bone then Sutton is sugared. If something is tawdry then it is navicular. If something is navicular and dioecian then it is not sugared. If something is sugared and dioecian then it is not bone. Furry things are bone. Karita is not bone.", "logic": "\nnot Korean(phillie)\nBone(phillie)\nNavicular(karita)\nnot Korean(karita)\nnot Dioecian(karita)\nBone(karita)\nBone(sutton)\nConducive(phip)\nDioecian(phip)\nBone(phip)\nforall x (Bone(x) -> Tawdry(x))\nforall x (Conducive(x) -> Tawdry(x))\nforall x (Navicular(x) and not Dioecian(x) -> Tawdry(x))\nKorean(sutton) and Bone(sutton) -> Sugared(sutton)\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> Navicular(x))\nforall x (Navicular(x) and Dioecian(x) -> not Sugared(x))\nforall x (Sugared(x) and Dioecian(x) -> not Bone(x))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> Bone(x))\n\nnot Bone(karita)\n\ntherefore Bone(karita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Rayna is not regular. Rayna is harmful. Annice is stinky. Annice is not regular. Annice is not macedonian. Annice is harmful. Honey is harmful. Carma is dumpy. Carma is macedonian. Carma is harmful. Round things are worsening. Nice things are worsening. If something is stinky and not macedonian then it is worsening. If Honey is regular and Honey is harmful then Honey is pilous. If something is worsening then it is stinky. If something is stinky and macedonian then it is not pilous. If something is pilous and macedonian then it is not harmful. Furry things are harmful. Carma is worsening.", "logic": "\nnot Regular(rayna)\nHarmful(rayna)\nStinky(annice)\nnot Regular(annice)\nnot Macedonian(annice)\nHarmful(annice)\nHarmful(honey)\nDumpy(carma)\nMacedonian(carma)\nHarmful(carma)\nforall x (Harmful(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Dumpy(x) -> Worsening(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) and not Macedonian(x) -> Worsening(x))\nRegular(honey) and Harmful(honey) -> Pilous(honey)\nforall x (Worsening(x) -> Stinky(x))\nforall x (Stinky(x) and Macedonian(x) -> not Pilous(x))\nforall x (Pilous(x) and Macedonian(x) -> not Harmful(x))\nforall x (Worsening(x) -> Harmful(x))\n\nWorsening(carma)\n\nHarmful(carma) and forall x (Harmful(x) -> Worsening(x)) -> therefore Worsening(carma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Ellynn is not prosperous. Ellynn is beloved. Mirna is preserved. Mirna is not prosperous. Mirna is not pustulate. Mirna is beloved. Finn is beloved. Torry is bigeneric. Torry is pustulate. Torry is beloved. Round things are dependant. Nice things are dependant. If something is preserved and not pustulate then it is dependant. If Finn is prosperous and Finn is beloved then Finn is blunted. If something is dependant then it is preserved. If something is preserved and pustulate then it is not blunted. If something is blunted and pustulate then it is not beloved. Furry things are beloved. Finn is not dependant.", "logic": "\nnot Prosperous(ellynn)\nBeloved(ellynn)\nPreserved(mirna)\nnot Prosperous(mirna)\nnot Pustulate(mirna)\nBeloved(mirna)\nBeloved(finn)\nBigeneric(torry)\nPustulate(torry)\nBeloved(torry)\nforall x (Beloved(x) -> Dependant(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) -> Dependant(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and not Pustulate(x) -> Dependant(x))\nProsperous(finn) and Beloved(finn) -> Blunted(finn)\nforall x (Dependant(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and Pustulate(x) -> not Blunted(x))\nforall x (Blunted(x) and Pustulate(x) -> not Beloved(x))\nforall x (Dependant(x) -> Beloved(x))\n\nnot Dependant(finn)\n\nBeloved(finn) and forall x (Beloved(x) -> Dependant(x)) -> therefore Dependant(finn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Orsa is not scalar. Orsa is starchy. Imojean is overjoyed. Imojean is not scalar. Imojean is not partial. Imojean is starchy. Dorri is starchy. Floyd is monacan. Floyd is partial. Floyd is starchy. Round things are feasible. Nice things are feasible. If something is overjoyed and not partial then it is feasible. If Dorri is scalar and Dorri is starchy then Dorri is lumpen. If something is feasible then it is overjoyed. If something is overjoyed and partial then it is not lumpen. If something is lumpen and partial then it is not starchy. Furry things are starchy. Orsa is overjoyed.", "logic": "\nnot Scalar(orsa)\nStarchy(orsa)\nOverjoyed(imojean)\nnot Scalar(imojean)\nnot Partial(imojean)\nStarchy(imojean)\nStarchy(dorri)\nMonacan(floyd)\nPartial(floyd)\nStarchy(floyd)\nforall x (Starchy(x) -> Feasible(x))\nforall x (Monacan(x) -> Feasible(x))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) and not Partial(x) -> Feasible(x))\nScalar(dorri) and Starchy(dorri) -> Lumpen(dorri)\nforall x (Feasible(x) -> Overjoyed(x))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) and Partial(x) -> not Lumpen(x))\nforall x (Lumpen(x) and Partial(x) -> not Starchy(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) -> Starchy(x))\n\nOverjoyed(orsa)\n\nStarchy(orsa) and forall x (Starchy(x) -> Feasible(x)) -> therefore Feasible(orsa) Feasible(orsa) and forall x (Feasible(x) -> Overjoyed(x)) -> therefore Overjoyed(orsa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Churchill is not ironic. Churchill is ominous. Kaleena is preserved. Kaleena is not ironic. Kaleena is not sweetened. Kaleena is ominous. Theda is ominous. Red is conserved. Red is sweetened. Red is ominous. Round things are murmurous. Nice things are murmurous. If something is preserved and not sweetened then it is murmurous. If Theda is ironic and Theda is ominous then Theda is unmelodic. If something is murmurous then it is preserved. If something is preserved and sweetened then it is not unmelodic. If something is unmelodic and sweetened then it is not ominous. Furry things are ominous. Red is not preserved.", "logic": "\nnot Ironic(churchill)\nOminous(churchill)\nPreserved(kaleena)\nnot Ironic(kaleena)\nnot Sweetened(kaleena)\nOminous(kaleena)\nOminous(theda)\nConserved(red)\nSweetened(red)\nOminous(red)\nforall x (Ominous(x) -> Murmurous(x))\nforall x (Conserved(x) -> Murmurous(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and not Sweetened(x) -> Murmurous(x))\nIronic(theda) and Ominous(theda) -> Unmelodic(theda)\nforall x (Murmurous(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and Sweetened(x) -> not Unmelodic(x))\nforall x (Unmelodic(x) and Sweetened(x) -> not Ominous(x))\nforall x (Murmurous(x) -> Ominous(x))\n\nnot Preserved(red)\n\nOminous(red) and forall x (Ominous(x) -> Murmurous(x)) -> therefore Murmurous(red) Murmurous(red) and forall x (Murmurous(x) -> Preserved(x)) -> therefore Preserved(red)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Maribeth is not genealogic. Maribeth is gnomic. Marcy is czarist. Marcy is not genealogic. Marcy is not clear. Marcy is gnomic. Giff is gnomic. Chen is biramous. Chen is clear. Chen is gnomic. Round things are dedicated. Nice things are dedicated. If something is czarist and not clear then it is dedicated. If Giff is genealogic and Giff is gnomic then Giff is misty. If something is dedicated then it is czarist. If something is czarist and clear then it is not misty. If something is misty and clear then it is not gnomic. Furry things are gnomic. Chen is not misty.", "logic": "\nnot Genealogic(maribeth)\nGnomic(maribeth)\nCzarist(marcy)\nnot Genealogic(marcy)\nnot Clear(marcy)\nGnomic(marcy)\nGnomic(giff)\nBiramous(chen)\nClear(chen)\nGnomic(chen)\nforall x (Gnomic(x) -> Dedicated(x))\nforall x (Biramous(x) -> Dedicated(x))\nforall x (Czarist(x) and not Clear(x) -> Dedicated(x))\nGenealogic(giff) and Gnomic(giff) -> Misty(giff)\nforall x (Dedicated(x) -> Czarist(x))\nforall x (Czarist(x) and Clear(x) -> not Misty(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) and Clear(x) -> not Gnomic(x))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) -> Gnomic(x))\n\nnot Misty(chen)\n\nGnomic(chen) and forall x (Gnomic(x) -> Dedicated(x)) -> therefore Dedicated(chen) Dedicated(chen) and forall x (Dedicated(x) -> Czarist(x)) -> therefore Czarist(chen) Czarist(chen) and Clear(chen) and forall x (Czarist(x) and Clear(x) -> not Misty(x)) -> therefore not Misty(chen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Licha is not riemannian. Licha is hygienic. Curtis is lithesome. Curtis is not riemannian. Curtis is not resiny. Curtis is hygienic. Lacey is hygienic. Garth is afloat. Garth is resiny. Garth is hygienic. Round things are motional. Nice things are motional. If something is lithesome and not resiny then it is motional. If Lacey is riemannian and Lacey is hygienic then Lacey is iraqi. If something is motional then it is lithesome. If something is lithesome and resiny then it is not iraqi. If something is iraqi and resiny then it is not hygienic. Furry things are hygienic. Garth is iraqi.", "logic": "\nnot Riemannian(licha)\nHygienic(licha)\nLithesome(curtis)\nnot Riemannian(curtis)\nnot Resiny(curtis)\nHygienic(curtis)\nHygienic(lacey)\nAfloat(garth)\nResiny(garth)\nHygienic(garth)\nforall x (Hygienic(x) -> Motional(x))\nforall x (Afloat(x) -> Motional(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) and not Resiny(x) -> Motional(x))\nRiemannian(lacey) and Hygienic(lacey) -> Iraqi(lacey)\nforall x (Motional(x) -> Lithesome(x))\nforall x (Lithesome(x) and Resiny(x) -> not Iraqi(x))\nforall x (Iraqi(x) and Resiny(x) -> not Hygienic(x))\nforall x (Motional(x) -> Hygienic(x))\n\nIraqi(garth)\n\nHygienic(garth) and forall x (Hygienic(x) -> Motional(x)) -> therefore Motional(garth) Motional(garth) and forall x (Motional(x) -> Lithesome(x)) -> therefore Lithesome(garth) Lithesome(garth) and Resiny(garth) and forall x (Lithesome(x) and Resiny(x) -> not Iraqi(x)) -> therefore not Iraqi(garth)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Bucky is not rotated. Bucky is sticking. Shauna is appalling. Shauna is not rotated. Shauna is not aerobiotic. Shauna is sticking. Bella is sticking. Caril is achromic. Caril is aerobiotic. Caril is sticking. Round things are nineteenth. Nice things are nineteenth. If something is appalling and not aerobiotic then it is nineteenth. If Bella is rotated and Bella is sticking then Bella is singsong. If something is nineteenth then it is appalling. If something is appalling and aerobiotic then it is not singsong. If something is singsong and aerobiotic then it is not sticking. Furry things are sticking. Bella is not singsong.", "logic": "\nnot Rotated(bucky)\nSticking(bucky)\nAppalling(shauna)\nnot Rotated(shauna)\nnot Aerobiotic(shauna)\nSticking(shauna)\nSticking(bella)\nAchromic(caril)\nAerobiotic(caril)\nSticking(caril)\nforall x (Sticking(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Achromic(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nforall x (Appalling(x) and not Aerobiotic(x) -> Nineteenth(x))\nRotated(bella) and Sticking(bella) -> Singsong(bella)\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) -> Appalling(x))\nforall x (Appalling(x) and Aerobiotic(x) -> not Singsong(x))\nforall x (Singsong(x) and Aerobiotic(x) -> not Sticking(x))\nforall x (Nineteenth(x) -> Sticking(x))\n\nnot Singsong(bella)\n\nRotated(bella) and Sticking(bella) -> Singsong(bella) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Mayda is not extempore. Mayda is twisty. Randy is congruous. Randy is not extempore. Randy is not awaited. Randy is twisty. Lurette is twisty. Tyrone is shopsoiled. Tyrone is awaited. Tyrone is twisty. Round things are unswayed. Nice things are unswayed. If something is congruous and not awaited then it is unswayed. If Lurette is extempore and Lurette is twisty then Lurette is orphic. If something is unswayed then it is congruous. If something is congruous and awaited then it is not orphic. If something is orphic and awaited then it is not twisty. Furry things are twisty. Lurette is awaited.", "logic": "\nnot Extempore(mayda)\nTwisty(mayda)\nCongruous(randy)\nnot Extempore(randy)\nnot Awaited(randy)\nTwisty(randy)\nTwisty(lurette)\nShopsoiled(tyrone)\nAwaited(tyrone)\nTwisty(tyrone)\nforall x (Twisty(x) -> Unswayed(x))\nforall x (Shopsoiled(x) -> Unswayed(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) and not Awaited(x) -> Unswayed(x))\nExtempore(lurette) and Twisty(lurette) -> Orphic(lurette)\nforall x (Unswayed(x) -> Congruous(x))\nforall x (Congruous(x) and Awaited(x) -> not Orphic(x))\nforall x (Orphic(x) and Awaited(x) -> not Twisty(x))\nforall x (Unswayed(x) -> Twisty(x))\n\nAwaited(lurette)\n\nAwaited(lurette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Rosanne is not meddlesome. Rosanne is supported. Kathryn is gammy. Kathryn is not meddlesome. Kathryn is not retentive. Kathryn is supported. Terese is supported. Margareta is epicurean. Margareta is retentive. Margareta is supported. Round things are harnessed. Nice things are harnessed. If something is gammy and not retentive then it is harnessed. If Terese is meddlesome and Terese is supported then Terese is carnal. If something is harnessed then it is gammy. If something is gammy and retentive then it is not carnal. If something is carnal and retentive then it is not supported. Furry things are supported. Margareta is not meddlesome.", "logic": "\nnot Meddlesome(rosanne)\nSupported(rosanne)\nGammy(kathryn)\nnot Meddlesome(kathryn)\nnot Retentive(kathryn)\nSupported(kathryn)\nSupported(terese)\nEpicurean(margareta)\nRetentive(margareta)\nSupported(margareta)\nforall x (Supported(x) -> Harnessed(x))\nforall x (Epicurean(x) -> Harnessed(x))\nforall x (Gammy(x) and not Retentive(x) -> Harnessed(x))\nMeddlesome(terese) and Supported(terese) -> Carnal(terese)\nforall x (Harnessed(x) -> Gammy(x))\nforall x (Gammy(x) and Retentive(x) -> not Carnal(x))\nforall x (Carnal(x) and Retentive(x) -> not Supported(x))\nforall x (Harnessed(x) -> Supported(x))\n\nnot Meddlesome(margareta)\n\nnot Meddlesome(margareta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Zorro is not spectacled. Zorro is flabby. Tarrah is affine. Tarrah is not spectacled. Tarrah is not auroral. Tarrah is flabby. Parke is flabby. Aylmer is marvelous. Aylmer is auroral. Aylmer is flabby. Round things are pianistic. Nice things are pianistic. If something is affine and not auroral then it is pianistic. If Parke is spectacled and Parke is flabby then Parke is terrified. If something is pianistic then it is affine. If something is affine and auroral then it is not terrified. If something is terrified and auroral then it is not flabby. Furry things are flabby. Parke is spectacled.", "logic": "\nnot Spectacled(zorro)\nFlabby(zorro)\nAffine(tarrah)\nnot Spectacled(tarrah)\nnot Auroral(tarrah)\nFlabby(tarrah)\nFlabby(parke)\nMarvelous(aylmer)\nAuroral(aylmer)\nFlabby(aylmer)\nforall x (Flabby(x) -> Pianistic(x))\nforall x (Marvelous(x) -> Pianistic(x))\nforall x (Affine(x) and not Auroral(x) -> Pianistic(x))\nSpectacled(parke) and Flabby(parke) -> Terrified(parke)\nforall x (Pianistic(x) -> Affine(x))\nforall x (Affine(x) and Auroral(x) -> not Terrified(x))\nforall x (Terrified(x) and Auroral(x) -> not Flabby(x))\nforall x (Pianistic(x) -> Flabby(x))\n\nSpectacled(parke)\n\nSpectacled(parke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Geo is not breathless. Geo is fatty. Roseanne is furred. Roseanne is not breathless. Roseanne is not defiant. Roseanne is fatty. Davita is fatty. Bekki is lacustrine. Bekki is defiant. Bekki is fatty. Round things are stunning. Nice things are stunning. If something is furred and not defiant then it is stunning. If Davita is breathless and Davita is fatty then Davita is torturing. If something is stunning then it is furred. If something is furred and defiant then it is not torturing. If something is torturing and defiant then it is not fatty. Furry things are fatty. Geo is not torturing.", "logic": "\nnot Breathless(geo)\nFatty(geo)\nFurred(roseanne)\nnot Breathless(roseanne)\nnot Defiant(roseanne)\nFatty(roseanne)\nFatty(davita)\nLacustrine(bekki)\nDefiant(bekki)\nFatty(bekki)\nforall x (Fatty(x) -> Stunning(x))\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) -> Stunning(x))\nforall x (Furred(x) and not Defiant(x) -> Stunning(x))\nBreathless(davita) and Fatty(davita) -> Torturing(davita)\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Furred(x))\nforall x (Furred(x) and Defiant(x) -> not Torturing(x))\nforall x (Torturing(x) and Defiant(x) -> not Fatty(x))\nforall x (Stunning(x) -> Fatty(x))\n\nnot Torturing(geo)\n\nnot Torturing(geo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Voltaire is not implacable. Voltaire is lowbrow. Cheryl is unaltered. Cheryl is not implacable. Cheryl is not ordinary. Cheryl is lowbrow. Lefty is lowbrow. Madeline is vincible. Madeline is ordinary. Madeline is lowbrow. Round things are scalic. Nice things are scalic. If something is unaltered and not ordinary then it is scalic. If Lefty is implacable and Lefty is lowbrow then Lefty is through. If something is scalic then it is unaltered. If something is unaltered and ordinary then it is not through. If something is through and ordinary then it is not lowbrow. Furry things are lowbrow. Lefty is vincible.", "logic": "\nnot Implacable(voltaire)\nLowbrow(voltaire)\nUnaltered(cheryl)\nnot Implacable(cheryl)\nnot Ordinary(cheryl)\nLowbrow(cheryl)\nLowbrow(lefty)\nVincible(madeline)\nOrdinary(madeline)\nLowbrow(madeline)\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Scalic(x))\nforall x (Vincible(x) -> Scalic(x))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) and not Ordinary(x) -> Scalic(x))\nImplacable(lefty) and Lowbrow(lefty) -> Through(lefty)\nforall x (Scalic(x) -> Unaltered(x))\nforall x (Unaltered(x) and Ordinary(x) -> not Through(x))\nforall x (Through(x) and Ordinary(x) -> not Lowbrow(x))\nforall x (Scalic(x) -> Lowbrow(x))\n\nVincible(lefty)\n\nVincible(lefty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Roseann is not opposing. Roseann is laminal. Karlen is crackers. Karlen is not opposing. Karlen is not coltish. Karlen is laminal. Teresita is laminal. Johannes is arcadian. Johannes is coltish. Johannes is laminal. Round things are tokenish. Nice things are tokenish. If something is crackers and not coltish then it is tokenish. If Teresita is opposing and Teresita is laminal then Teresita is cantering. If something is tokenish then it is crackers. If something is crackers and coltish then it is not cantering. If something is cantering and coltish then it is not laminal. Furry things are laminal. Karlen is not cantering.", "logic": "\nnot Opposing(roseann)\nLaminal(roseann)\nCrackers(karlen)\nnot Opposing(karlen)\nnot Coltish(karlen)\nLaminal(karlen)\nLaminal(teresita)\nArcadian(johannes)\nColtish(johannes)\nLaminal(johannes)\nforall x (Laminal(x) -> Tokenish(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> Tokenish(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) and not Coltish(x) -> Tokenish(x))\nOpposing(teresita) and Laminal(teresita) -> Cantering(teresita)\nforall x (Tokenish(x) -> Crackers(x))\nforall x (Crackers(x) and Coltish(x) -> not Cantering(x))\nforall x (Cantering(x) and Coltish(x) -> not Laminal(x))\nforall x (Tokenish(x) -> Laminal(x))\n\nnot Cantering(karlen)\n\nnot Cantering(karlen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "Winnie is not nett. Winnie is fixed. Hogan is lovelorn. Hogan is not nett. Hogan is not promising. Hogan is fixed. Sapphira is fixed. Thomasina is unassigned. Thomasina is promising. Thomasina is fixed. Round things are inculpable. Nice things are inculpable. If something is lovelorn and not promising then it is inculpable. If Sapphira is nett and Sapphira is fixed then Sapphira is lidless. If something is inculpable then it is lovelorn. If something is lovelorn and promising then it is not lidless. If something is lidless and promising then it is not fixed. Furry things are fixed. Winnie is unassigned.", "logic": "\nnot Nett(winnie)\nFixed(winnie)\nLovelorn(hogan)\nnot Nett(hogan)\nnot Promising(hogan)\nFixed(hogan)\nFixed(sapphira)\nUnassigned(thomasina)\nPromising(thomasina)\nFixed(thomasina)\nforall x (Fixed(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nforall x (Unassigned(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and not Promising(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nNett(sapphira) and Fixed(sapphira) -> Lidless(sapphira)\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> Lovelorn(x))\nforall x (Lovelorn(x) and Promising(x) -> not Lidless(x))\nforall x (Lidless(x) and Promising(x) -> not Fixed(x))\nforall x (Inculpable(x) -> Fixed(x))\n\nUnassigned(winnie)\n\nUnassigned(winnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1053"} {"premises": "The ellis is unpitying. The diannne tarmac the ellis. The diannne confess the ellis. The shina tarmac the diannne. The shina is credal. The shina confess the diannne. The shina quit the diannne. If the shina tarmac the ellis then the shina confess the ellis. If something tarmac the diannne and it quit the diannne then the diannne is recluse. If something confess the diannne then it quit the ellis. The shina is credal.", "logic": "\nUnpitying(ellis)\nTarmac(diannne, ellis)\nConfess(diannne, ellis)\nTarmac(shina, diannne)\nCredal(shina)\nConfess(shina, diannne)\nQuit(shina, diannne)\nTarmac(shina, ellis) -> Confess(shina, ellis)\nforall x (Tarmac(x, diannne) and Quit(x, diannne) -> Recluse(diannne))\nforall x (Confess(x, diannne) -> Quit(x, ellis))\n\nCredal(shina)\n\ntherefore Credal(shina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "The sargent is echoless. The kandy cannulize the sargent. The kandy dine the sargent. The sergio cannulize the kandy. The sergio is pejorative. The sergio dine the kandy. The sergio overstrain the kandy. If the sergio cannulize the sargent then the sergio dine the sargent. If something cannulize the kandy and it overstrain the kandy then the kandy is fringy. If something dine the kandy then it overstrain the sargent. The sergio does not need the kandy.", "logic": "\nEcholess(sargent)\nCannulize(kandy, sargent)\nDine(kandy, sargent)\nCannulize(sergio, kandy)\nPejorative(sergio)\nDine(sergio, kandy)\nOverstrain(sergio, kandy)\nCannulize(sergio, sargent) -> Dine(sergio, sargent)\nforall x (Cannulize(x, kandy) and Overstrain(x, kandy) -> Fringy(kandy))\nforall x (Dine(x, kandy) -> Overstrain(x, sargent))\n\nnot Dine(sergio, kandy)\n\ntherefore Dine(sergio, kandy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "The erma is verbalized. The wynne flitter the erma. The wynne enwrap the erma. The flower flitter the wynne. The flower is delimited. The flower enwrap the wynne. The flower embellish the wynne. If the flower flitter the erma then the flower enwrap the erma. If something flitter the wynne and it embellish the wynne then the wynne is deathly. If something enwrap the wynne then it embellish the erma. The flower embellish the erma.", "logic": "\nVerbalized(erma)\nFlitter(wynne, erma)\nEnwrap(wynne, erma)\nFlitter(flower, wynne)\nDelimited(flower)\nEnwrap(flower, wynne)\nEmbellish(flower, wynne)\nFlitter(flower, erma) -> Enwrap(flower, erma)\nforall x (Flitter(x, wynne) and Embellish(x, wynne) -> Deathly(wynne))\nforall x (Enwrap(x, wynne) -> Embellish(x, erma))\n\nEmbellish(flower, erma)\n\nEnwrap(flower, wynne) and forall x (Enwrap(x, wynne) -> Embellish(x, erma)) -> therefore Embellish(flower, erma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "The wilek is solar. The trista hanker the wilek. The trista muster the wilek. The michal hanker the trista. The michal is busybodied. The michal muster the trista. The michal lord the trista. If the michal hanker the wilek then the michal muster the wilek. If something hanker the trista and it lord the trista then the trista is deciduous. If something muster the trista then it lord the wilek. The trista is not deciduous.", "logic": "\nSolar(wilek)\nHanker(trista, wilek)\nMuster(trista, wilek)\nHanker(michal, trista)\nBusybodied(michal)\nMuster(michal, trista)\nLord(michal, trista)\nHanker(michal, wilek) -> Muster(michal, wilek)\nforall x (Hanker(x, trista) and Lord(x, trista) -> Deciduous(trista))\nforall x (Muster(x, trista) -> Lord(x, wilek))\n\nnot Deciduous(trista)\n\nHanker(michal, trista) and Lord(michal, trista) and forall x (Hanker(x, trista) and Lord(x, trista) -> Deciduous(trista)) -> therefore Deciduous(trista)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "The roderic is straw. The etty disco the roderic. The etty skedaddle the roderic. The nonah disco the etty. The nonah is auditory. The nonah skedaddle the etty. The nonah reinforce the etty. If the nonah disco the roderic then the nonah skedaddle the roderic. If something disco the etty and it reinforce the etty then the etty is lxvii. If something skedaddle the etty then it reinforce the roderic. The etty does not visit the roderic.", "logic": "\nStraw(roderic)\nDisco(etty, roderic)\nSkedaddle(etty, roderic)\nDisco(nonah, etty)\nAuditory(nonah)\nSkedaddle(nonah, etty)\nReinforce(nonah, etty)\nDisco(nonah, roderic) -> Skedaddle(nonah, roderic)\nforall x (Disco(x, etty) and Reinforce(x, etty) -> Lxvii(etty))\nforall x (Skedaddle(x, etty) -> Reinforce(x, roderic))\n\nnot Reinforce(etty, roderic)\n\nforall x (Skedaddle(x, etty) -> Reinforce(x, roderic)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "The chadwick is cordless. The reeva italicize the chadwick. The reeva chord the chadwick. The jud italicize the reeva. The jud is pokey. The jud chord the reeva. The jud dampen the reeva. If the jud italicize the chadwick then the jud chord the chadwick. If something italicize the reeva and it dampen the reeva then the reeva is bantu. If something chord the reeva then it dampen the chadwick. The jud chord the chadwick.", "logic": "\nCordless(chadwick)\nItalicize(reeva, chadwick)\nChord(reeva, chadwick)\nItalicize(jud, reeva)\nPokey(jud)\nChord(jud, reeva)\nDampen(jud, reeva)\nItalicize(jud, chadwick) -> Chord(jud, chadwick)\nforall x (Italicize(x, reeva) and Dampen(x, reeva) -> Bantu(reeva))\nforall x (Chord(x, reeva) -> Dampen(x, chadwick))\n\nChord(jud, chadwick)\n\nItalicize(jud, chadwick) -> Chord(jud, chadwick) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "The jade is lanky. The winona manipulate the jade. The winona supercede the jade. The noelle manipulate the winona. The noelle is leaved. The noelle supercede the winona. The noelle canulate the winona. If the noelle manipulate the jade then the noelle supercede the jade. If something manipulate the winona and it canulate the winona then the winona is stunned. If something supercede the winona then it canulate the jade. The noelle does not visit the noelle.", "logic": "\nLanky(jade)\nManipulate(winona, jade)\nSupercede(winona, jade)\nManipulate(noelle, winona)\nLeaved(noelle)\nSupercede(noelle, winona)\nCanulate(noelle, winona)\nManipulate(noelle, jade) -> Supercede(noelle, jade)\nforall x (Manipulate(x, winona) and Canulate(x, winona) -> Stunned(winona))\nforall x (Supercede(x, winona) -> Canulate(x, jade))\n\nnot Canulate(noelle, noelle)\n\nnot Canulate(noelle, noelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "The bruce is easterly. The dore stalk the bruce. The dore room the bruce. The amata stalk the dore. The amata is sauteed. The amata room the dore. The amata centrifuge the dore. If the amata stalk the bruce then the amata room the bruce. If something stalk the dore and it centrifuge the dore then the dore is original. If something room the dore then it centrifuge the bruce. The bruce is original.", "logic": "\nEasterly(bruce)\nStalk(dore, bruce)\nRoom(dore, bruce)\nStalk(amata, dore)\nSauteed(amata)\nRoom(amata, dore)\nCentrifuge(amata, dore)\nStalk(amata, bruce) -> Room(amata, bruce)\nforall x (Stalk(x, dore) and Centrifuge(x, dore) -> Original(dore))\nforall x (Room(x, dore) -> Centrifuge(x, bruce))\n\nOriginal(bruce)\n\nOriginal(bruce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-1702"} {"premises": "Jewell is exempt. Jewell is octagonal. Kerstin is pressed. Kerstin is octagonal. Kerstin is amphibian. Yvonne is pressed. Yvonne is fizzing. Yvonne is leptorhine. Aurlie is exempt. Aurlie is fizzing. All amphibian, exempt people are leptorhine. If someone is amphibian then they are exempt. Yvonne is leptorhine.", "logic": "\nExempt(jewell)\nOctagonal(jewell)\nPressed(kerstin)\nOctagonal(kerstin)\nAmphibian(kerstin)\nPressed(yvonne)\nFizzing(yvonne)\nLeptorhine(yvonne)\nExempt(aurlie)\nFizzing(aurlie)\nforall x (Amphibian(x) and Exempt(x) -> Leptorhine(x))\nforall x (Amphibian(x) -> Exempt(x))\n\nLeptorhine(yvonne)\n\ntherefore Leptorhine(yvonne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Audre is semidark. Audre is uncharted. Frederica is rentable. Frederica is uncharted. Frederica is exogenic. Kevyn is rentable. Kevyn is inexpiable. Kevyn is whitened. Nettie is semidark. Nettie is inexpiable. All exogenic, semidark people are whitened. If someone is exogenic then they are semidark. Audre is not uncharted.", "logic": "\nSemidark(audre)\nUncharted(audre)\nRentable(frederica)\nUncharted(frederica)\nExogenic(frederica)\nRentable(kevyn)\nInexpiable(kevyn)\nWhitened(kevyn)\nSemidark(nettie)\nInexpiable(nettie)\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and Semidark(x) -> Whitened(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) -> Semidark(x))\n\nnot Uncharted(audre)\n\ntherefore Uncharted(audre)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Alexei is epidermal. Alexei is doleful. Poppy is magnetic. Poppy is doleful. Poppy is brownish. Angelique is magnetic. Angelique is sham. Angelique is jerkwater. Katya is epidermal. Katya is sham. All brownish, epidermal people are jerkwater. If someone is brownish then they are epidermal. Poppy is epidermal.", "logic": "\nEpidermal(alexei)\nDoleful(alexei)\nMagnetic(poppy)\nDoleful(poppy)\nBrownish(poppy)\nMagnetic(angelique)\nSham(angelique)\nJerkwater(angelique)\nEpidermal(katya)\nSham(katya)\nforall x (Brownish(x) and Epidermal(x) -> Jerkwater(x))\nforall x (Brownish(x) -> Epidermal(x))\n\nEpidermal(poppy)\n\nBrownish(poppy) and forall x (Brownish(x) -> Epidermal(x)) -> therefore Epidermal(poppy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Napoleon is carpetbag. Napoleon is flaring. Wilburn is shaken. Wilburn is flaring. Wilburn is cosmologic. Darsie is shaken. Darsie is airtight. Darsie is turned. Inesita is carpetbag. Inesita is airtight. All cosmologic, carpetbag people are turned. If someone is cosmologic then they are carpetbag. Wilburn is not carpetbag.", "logic": "\nCarpetbag(napoleon)\nFlaring(napoleon)\nShaken(wilburn)\nFlaring(wilburn)\nCosmologic(wilburn)\nShaken(darsie)\nAirtight(darsie)\nTurned(darsie)\nCarpetbag(inesita)\nAirtight(inesita)\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) and Carpetbag(x) -> Turned(x))\nforall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Carpetbag(x))\n\nnot Carpetbag(wilburn)\n\nCosmologic(wilburn) and forall x (Cosmologic(x) -> Carpetbag(x)) -> therefore Carpetbag(wilburn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Cybal is reliable. Cybal is overfull. Victoria is sizable. Victoria is overfull. Victoria is ligneous. Hallie is sizable. Hallie is unwitting. Hallie is perversive. Rabbi is reliable. Rabbi is unwitting. All ligneous, reliable people are perversive. If someone is ligneous then they are reliable. Victoria is perversive.", "logic": "\nReliable(cybal)\nOverfull(cybal)\nSizable(victoria)\nOverfull(victoria)\nLigneous(victoria)\nSizable(hallie)\nUnwitting(hallie)\nPerversive(hallie)\nReliable(rabbi)\nUnwitting(rabbi)\nforall x (Ligneous(x) and Reliable(x) -> Perversive(x))\nforall x (Ligneous(x) -> Reliable(x))\n\nPerversive(victoria)\n\nLigneous(victoria) and forall x (Ligneous(x) -> Reliable(x)) -> therefore Reliable(victoria) Ligneous(victoria) and Reliable(victoria) and forall x (Ligneous(x) and Reliable(x) -> Perversive(x)) -> therefore Perversive(victoria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Rozele is petrous. Rozele is lacy. Adriaens is least. Adriaens is lacy. Adriaens is myotonic. Celestine is least. Celestine is absolved. Celestine is synoptic. Jennine is petrous. Jennine is absolved. All myotonic, petrous people are synoptic. If someone is myotonic then they are petrous. Adriaens is not synoptic.", "logic": "\nPetrous(rozele)\nLacy(rozele)\nLeast(adriaens)\nLacy(adriaens)\nMyotonic(adriaens)\nLeast(celestine)\nAbsolved(celestine)\nSynoptic(celestine)\nPetrous(jennine)\nAbsolved(jennine)\nforall x (Myotonic(x) and Petrous(x) -> Synoptic(x))\nforall x (Myotonic(x) -> Petrous(x))\n\nnot Synoptic(adriaens)\n\nMyotonic(adriaens) and forall x (Myotonic(x) -> Petrous(x)) -> therefore Petrous(adriaens) Myotonic(adriaens) and Petrous(adriaens) and forall x (Myotonic(x) and Petrous(x) -> Synoptic(x)) -> therefore Synoptic(adriaens)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Tella is leonine. Tella is panoplied. Bard is unimproved. Bard is panoplied. Bard is baleful. Cal is unimproved. Cal is declarable. Cal is blabby. Aron is leonine. Aron is declarable. All baleful, leonine people are blabby. If someone is baleful then they are leonine. Tella is not blabby.", "logic": "\nLeonine(tella)\nPanoplied(tella)\nUnimproved(bard)\nPanoplied(bard)\nBaleful(bard)\nUnimproved(cal)\nDeclarable(cal)\nBlabby(cal)\nLeonine(aron)\nDeclarable(aron)\nforall x (Baleful(x) and Leonine(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Baleful(x) -> Leonine(x))\n\nnot Blabby(tella)\n\nforall x (Baleful(x) and Leonine(x) -> Blabby(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Lana is sere. Lana is crenate. Pansy is bouldered. Pansy is crenate. Pansy is acerbic. Robert is bouldered. Robert is siouan. Robert is hardy. Charlton is sere. Charlton is siouan. All acerbic, sere people are hardy. If someone is acerbic then they are sere. Charlton is hardy.", "logic": "\nSere(lana)\nCrenate(lana)\nBouldered(pansy)\nCrenate(pansy)\nAcerbic(pansy)\nBouldered(robert)\nSiouan(robert)\nHardy(robert)\nSere(charlton)\nSiouan(charlton)\nforall x (Acerbic(x) and Sere(x) -> Hardy(x))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) -> Sere(x))\n\nHardy(charlton)\n\nforall x (Acerbic(x) and Sere(x) -> Hardy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Dale is chilean. Dale is blurred. Arther is coercive. Arther is blurred. Arther is unpainted. Othelia is coercive. Othelia is climbable. Othelia is reviving. Collins is chilean. Collins is climbable. All unpainted, chilean people are reviving. If someone is unpainted then they are chilean. Othelia is not chilean.", "logic": "\nChilean(dale)\nBlurred(dale)\nCoercive(arther)\nBlurred(arther)\nUnpainted(arther)\nCoercive(othelia)\nClimbable(othelia)\nReviving(othelia)\nChilean(collins)\nClimbable(collins)\nforall x (Unpainted(x) and Chilean(x) -> Reviving(x))\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Chilean(x))\n\nnot Chilean(othelia)\n\nforall x (Unpainted(x) -> Chilean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Ines is welcome. Ines is ionized. Damita is meandering. Damita is ionized. Damita is sedative. Brigid is meandering. Brigid is squat. Brigid is forte. Milton is welcome. Milton is squat. All sedative, welcome people are forte. If someone is sedative then they are welcome. Milton is ionized.", "logic": "\nWelcome(ines)\nIonized(ines)\nMeandering(damita)\nIonized(damita)\nSedative(damita)\nMeandering(brigid)\nSquat(brigid)\nForte(brigid)\nWelcome(milton)\nSquat(milton)\nforall x (Sedative(x) and Welcome(x) -> Forte(x))\nforall x (Sedative(x) -> Welcome(x))\n\nIonized(milton)\n\nIonized(milton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Gustie is alveolate. Gustie is chylific. Immanuel is woolly. Immanuel is chylific. Immanuel is hogged. Ophelia is woolly. Ophelia is cathartic. Ophelia is liable. Hermine is alveolate. Hermine is cathartic. All hogged, alveolate people are liable. If someone is hogged then they are alveolate. Gustie is not white.", "logic": "\nAlveolate(gustie)\nChylific(gustie)\nWoolly(immanuel)\nChylific(immanuel)\nHogged(immanuel)\nWoolly(ophelia)\nCathartic(ophelia)\nLiable(ophelia)\nAlveolate(hermine)\nCathartic(hermine)\nforall x (Hogged(x) and Alveolate(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Hogged(x) -> Alveolate(x))\n\nnot White(gustie)\n\nnot White(gustie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Jamima is healthier. Jamima is arching. Tiphani is antennal. Tiphani is arching. Tiphani is capsulate. Waneta is antennal. Waneta is euclidean. Waneta is lento. Letisha is healthier. Letisha is euclidean. All capsulate, healthier people are lento. If someone is capsulate then they are healthier. Waneta is arching.", "logic": "\nHealthier(jamima)\nArching(jamima)\nAntennal(tiphani)\nArching(tiphani)\nCapsulate(tiphani)\nAntennal(waneta)\nEuclidean(waneta)\nLento(waneta)\nHealthier(letisha)\nEuclidean(letisha)\nforall x (Capsulate(x) and Healthier(x) -> Lento(x))\nforall x (Capsulate(x) -> Healthier(x))\n\nArching(waneta)\n\nArching(waneta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-2360"} {"premises": "Garv is thornless. Rozella is maoist. Gene is telescoped. Augustin is flaunty. Green, telescoped things are thornless. Furry, flaunty things are telescoped. Young things are thornless. If Gene is reanimated and Gene is alveolar then Gene is thornless. If something is telescoped then it is reanimated. If something is maoist then it is flaunty. Augustin is flaunty.", "logic": "\nThornless(garv)\nMaoist(rozella)\nTelescoped(gene)\nFlaunty(augustin)\nforall x (Alveolar(x) and Telescoped(x) -> Thornless(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) and Flaunty(x) -> Telescoped(x))\nforall x (Nodding(x) -> Thornless(x))\nReanimated(gene) and Alveolar(gene) -> Thornless(gene)\nforall x (Telescoped(x) -> Reanimated(x))\nforall x (Maoist(x) -> Flaunty(x))\n\nFlaunty(augustin)\n\ntherefore Flaunty(augustin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Madalena is delectable. Michal is vulturine. Seth is placating. Loralyn is diplomatic. Green, placating things are delectable. Furry, diplomatic things are placating. Young things are delectable. If Seth is bolshy and Seth is outrigged then Seth is delectable. If something is placating then it is bolshy. If something is vulturine then it is diplomatic. Loralyn is not diplomatic.", "logic": "\nDelectable(madalena)\nVulturine(michal)\nPlacating(seth)\nDiplomatic(loralyn)\nforall x (Outrigged(x) and Placating(x) -> Delectable(x))\nforall x (Vulturine(x) and Diplomatic(x) -> Placating(x))\nforall x (Deadly(x) -> Delectable(x))\nBolshy(seth) and Outrigged(seth) -> Delectable(seth)\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Bolshy(x))\nforall x (Vulturine(x) -> Diplomatic(x))\n\nnot Diplomatic(loralyn)\n\ntherefore Diplomatic(loralyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Merlina is unsealed. Darwin is randomised. Shawn is parentless. Marina is neglected. Green, parentless things are unsealed. Furry, neglected things are parentless. Young things are unsealed. If Shawn is silklike and Shawn is endless then Shawn is unsealed. If something is parentless then it is silklike. If something is randomised then it is neglected. Darwin is neglected.", "logic": "\nUnsealed(merlina)\nRandomised(darwin)\nParentless(shawn)\nNeglected(marina)\nforall x (Endless(x) and Parentless(x) -> Unsealed(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) and Neglected(x) -> Parentless(x))\nforall x (Hateful(x) -> Unsealed(x))\nSilklike(shawn) and Endless(shawn) -> Unsealed(shawn)\nforall x (Parentless(x) -> Silklike(x))\nforall x (Randomised(x) -> Neglected(x))\n\nNeglected(darwin)\n\nRandomised(darwin) and forall x (Randomised(x) -> Neglected(x)) -> therefore Neglected(darwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Walton is viatical. Marlie is domed. Celinka is unsavoury. Luis is austere. Green, unsavoury things are viatical. Furry, austere things are unsavoury. Young things are viatical. If Celinka is easterly and Celinka is euphonious then Celinka is viatical. If something is unsavoury then it is easterly. If something is domed then it is austere. Marlie is not austere.", "logic": "\nViatical(walton)\nDomed(marlie)\nUnsavoury(celinka)\nAustere(luis)\nforall x (Euphonious(x) and Unsavoury(x) -> Viatical(x))\nforall x (Domed(x) and Austere(x) -> Unsavoury(x))\nforall x (Fiendish(x) -> Viatical(x))\nEasterly(celinka) and Euphonious(celinka) -> Viatical(celinka)\nforall x (Unsavoury(x) -> Easterly(x))\nforall x (Domed(x) -> Austere(x))\n\nnot Austere(marlie)\n\nDomed(marlie) and forall x (Domed(x) -> Austere(x)) -> therefore Austere(marlie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Boyce is branchial. Krystyna is conjugated. Robinette is marital. Brandice is equivocal. Green, marital things are branchial. Furry, equivocal things are marital. Young things are branchial. If Robinette is ascensive and Robinette is improvised then Robinette is branchial. If something is marital then it is ascensive. If something is conjugated then it is equivocal. Krystyna is marital.", "logic": "\nBranchial(boyce)\nConjugated(krystyna)\nMarital(robinette)\nEquivocal(brandice)\nforall x (Improvised(x) and Marital(x) -> Branchial(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) and Equivocal(x) -> Marital(x))\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) -> Branchial(x))\nAscensive(robinette) and Improvised(robinette) -> Branchial(robinette)\nforall x (Marital(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Conjugated(x) -> Equivocal(x))\n\nMarital(krystyna)\n\nConjugated(krystyna) and forall x (Conjugated(x) -> Equivocal(x)) -> therefore Equivocal(krystyna) Conjugated(krystyna) and Equivocal(krystyna) and forall x (Conjugated(x) and Equivocal(x) -> Marital(x)) -> therefore Marital(krystyna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Jabez is stable. Arleyne is born. Babette is erudite. Giavani is halcyon. Green, erudite things are stable. Furry, halcyon things are erudite. Young things are stable. If Babette is unneurotic and Babette is depictive then Babette is stable. If something is erudite then it is unneurotic. If something is born then it is halcyon. Arleyne is not erudite.", "logic": "\nStable(jabez)\nBorn(arleyne)\nErudite(babette)\nHalcyon(giavani)\nforall x (Depictive(x) and Erudite(x) -> Stable(x))\nforall x (Born(x) and Halcyon(x) -> Erudite(x))\nforall x (Unproven(x) -> Stable(x))\nUnneurotic(babette) and Depictive(babette) -> Stable(babette)\nforall x (Erudite(x) -> Unneurotic(x))\nforall x (Born(x) -> Halcyon(x))\n\nnot Erudite(arleyne)\n\nBorn(arleyne) and forall x (Born(x) -> Halcyon(x)) -> therefore Halcyon(arleyne) Born(arleyne) and Halcyon(arleyne) and forall x (Born(x) and Halcyon(x) -> Erudite(x)) -> therefore Erudite(arleyne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Berty is emphatic. Krystalle is stellate. Wilhelm is singable. Oleg is epigastric. Green, singable things are emphatic. Furry, epigastric things are singable. Young things are emphatic. If Wilhelm is valved and Wilhelm is unseen then Wilhelm is emphatic. If something is singable then it is valved. If something is stellate then it is epigastric. Krystalle is valved.", "logic": "\nEmphatic(berty)\nStellate(krystalle)\nSingable(wilhelm)\nEpigastric(oleg)\nforall x (Unseen(x) and Singable(x) -> Emphatic(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) and Epigastric(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Fringed(x) -> Emphatic(x))\nValved(wilhelm) and Unseen(wilhelm) -> Emphatic(wilhelm)\nforall x (Singable(x) -> Valved(x))\nforall x (Stellate(x) -> Epigastric(x))\n\nValved(krystalle)\n\nStellate(krystalle) and forall x (Stellate(x) -> Epigastric(x)) -> therefore Epigastric(krystalle) Stellate(krystalle) and Epigastric(krystalle) and forall x (Stellate(x) and Epigastric(x) -> Singable(x)) -> therefore Singable(krystalle) Singable(krystalle) and forall x (Singable(x) -> Valved(x)) -> therefore Valved(krystalle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Daryl is preclusive. Pearline is chimeric. Wilson is xlvii. Cody is poignant. Green, xlvii things are preclusive. Furry, poignant things are xlvii. Young things are preclusive. If Wilson is struggling and Wilson is earthlike then Wilson is preclusive. If something is xlvii then it is struggling. If something is chimeric then it is poignant. Pearline is not struggling.", "logic": "\nPreclusive(daryl)\nChimeric(pearline)\nXlvii(wilson)\nPoignant(cody)\nforall x (Earthlike(x) and Xlvii(x) -> Preclusive(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) and Poignant(x) -> Xlvii(x))\nforall x (Numeric(x) -> Preclusive(x))\nStruggling(wilson) and Earthlike(wilson) -> Preclusive(wilson)\nforall x (Xlvii(x) -> Struggling(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Poignant(x))\n\nnot Struggling(pearline)\n\nChimeric(pearline) and forall x (Chimeric(x) -> Poignant(x)) -> therefore Poignant(pearline) Chimeric(pearline) and Poignant(pearline) and forall x (Chimeric(x) and Poignant(x) -> Xlvii(x)) -> therefore Xlvii(pearline) Xlvii(pearline) and forall x (Xlvii(x) -> Struggling(x)) -> therefore Struggling(pearline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Celinka is dropping. Elysia is reticulate. Marina is illusive. Joelle is schematic. Green, illusive things are dropping. Furry, schematic things are illusive. Young things are dropping. If Marina is deranged and Marina is exciting then Marina is dropping. If something is illusive then it is deranged. If something is reticulate then it is schematic. Marina is not dropping.", "logic": "\nDropping(celinka)\nReticulate(elysia)\nIllusive(marina)\nSchematic(joelle)\nforall x (Exciting(x) and Illusive(x) -> Dropping(x))\nforall x (Reticulate(x) and Schematic(x) -> Illusive(x))\nforall x (Sober(x) -> Dropping(x))\nDeranged(marina) and Exciting(marina) -> Dropping(marina)\nforall x (Illusive(x) -> Deranged(x))\nforall x (Reticulate(x) -> Schematic(x))\n\nnot Dropping(marina)\n\nforall x (Exciting(x) and Illusive(x) -> Dropping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Tanney is comal. Lilli is divisible. Gaven is steerable. Tim is upcoming. Green, steerable things are comal. Furry, upcoming things are steerable. Young things are comal. If Gaven is fulsome and Gaven is repellent then Gaven is comal. If something is steerable then it is fulsome. If something is divisible then it is upcoming. Tanney is fulsome.", "logic": "\nComal(tanney)\nDivisible(lilli)\nSteerable(gaven)\nUpcoming(tim)\nforall x (Repellent(x) and Steerable(x) -> Comal(x))\nforall x (Divisible(x) and Upcoming(x) -> Steerable(x))\nforall x (Thousand(x) -> Comal(x))\nFulsome(gaven) and Repellent(gaven) -> Comal(gaven)\nforall x (Steerable(x) -> Fulsome(x))\nforall x (Divisible(x) -> Upcoming(x))\n\nFulsome(tanney)\n\nforall x (Steerable(x) -> Fulsome(x)) <- forall x (Divisible(x) and Upcoming(x) -> Steerable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Riva is allargando. Laurena is crescendo. Odin is overlooked. Lora is indecisive. Green, overlooked things are allargando. Furry, indecisive things are overlooked. Young things are allargando. If Odin is mongoloid and Odin is associate then Odin is allargando. If something is overlooked then it is mongoloid. If something is crescendo then it is indecisive. Riva is not indecisive.", "logic": "\nAllargando(riva)\nCrescendo(laurena)\nOverlooked(odin)\nIndecisive(lora)\nforall x (Associate(x) and Overlooked(x) -> Allargando(x))\nforall x (Crescendo(x) and Indecisive(x) -> Overlooked(x))\nforall x (Oriented(x) -> Allargando(x))\nMongoloid(odin) and Associate(odin) -> Allargando(odin)\nforall x (Overlooked(x) -> Mongoloid(x))\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Indecisive(x))\n\nnot Indecisive(riva)\n\nforall x (Crescendo(x) -> Indecisive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Lanita is gauzy. Nannette is glial. Kakalina is jeweled. Ruperta is undoable. Green, jeweled things are gauzy. Furry, undoable things are jeweled. Young things are gauzy. If Kakalina is antiquated and Kakalina is hammered then Kakalina is gauzy. If something is jeweled then it is antiquated. If something is glial then it is undoable. Ruperta is gauzy.", "logic": "\nGauzy(lanita)\nGlial(nannette)\nJeweled(kakalina)\nUndoable(ruperta)\nforall x (Hammered(x) and Jeweled(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Glial(x) and Undoable(x) -> Jeweled(x))\nforall x (Earlyish(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nAntiquated(kakalina) and Hammered(kakalina) -> Gauzy(kakalina)\nforall x (Jeweled(x) -> Antiquated(x))\nforall x (Glial(x) -> Undoable(x))\n\nGauzy(ruperta)\n\nforall x (Hammered(x) and Jeweled(x) -> Gauzy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Annadiane is divisive. Corene is molded. Doralin is endovenous. Arabele is satiny. Green, endovenous things are divisive. Furry, satiny things are endovenous. Young things are divisive. If Doralin is amnesiac and Doralin is whiplike then Doralin is divisive. If something is endovenous then it is amnesiac. If something is molded then it is satiny. Arabele is not whiplike.", "logic": "\nDivisive(annadiane)\nMolded(corene)\nEndovenous(doralin)\nSatiny(arabele)\nforall x (Whiplike(x) and Endovenous(x) -> Divisive(x))\nforall x (Molded(x) and Satiny(x) -> Endovenous(x))\nforall x (Clxxv(x) -> Divisive(x))\nAmnesiac(doralin) and Whiplike(doralin) -> Divisive(doralin)\nforall x (Endovenous(x) -> Amnesiac(x))\nforall x (Molded(x) -> Satiny(x))\n\nnot Whiplike(arabele)\n\nnot Whiplike(arabele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Vivyanne is bowing. Shepherd is chartless. Marcus is ebullient. Quinn is reticulate. Green, ebullient things are bowing. Furry, reticulate things are ebullient. Young things are bowing. If Marcus is incessant and Marcus is balanced then Marcus is bowing. If something is ebullient then it is incessant. If something is chartless then it is reticulate. Shepherd is each.", "logic": "\nBowing(vivyanne)\nChartless(shepherd)\nEbullient(marcus)\nReticulate(quinn)\nforall x (Balanced(x) and Ebullient(x) -> Bowing(x))\nforall x (Chartless(x) and Reticulate(x) -> Ebullient(x))\nforall x (Each(x) -> Bowing(x))\nIncessant(marcus) and Balanced(marcus) -> Bowing(marcus)\nforall x (Ebullient(x) -> Incessant(x))\nforall x (Chartless(x) -> Reticulate(x))\n\nEach(shepherd)\n\nEach(shepherd) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Donnajean is rapturous. Clement is germinal. Allis is sweptback. Stesha is antipodal. Green, sweptback things are rapturous. Furry, antipodal things are sweptback. Young things are rapturous. If Allis is bunglesome and Allis is leglike then Allis is rapturous. If something is sweptback then it is bunglesome. If something is germinal then it is antipodal. Stesha is not amphoteric.", "logic": "\nRapturous(donnajean)\nGerminal(clement)\nSweptback(allis)\nAntipodal(stesha)\nforall x (Leglike(x) and Sweptback(x) -> Rapturous(x))\nforall x (Germinal(x) and Antipodal(x) -> Sweptback(x))\nforall x (Amphoteric(x) -> Rapturous(x))\nBunglesome(allis) and Leglike(allis) -> Rapturous(allis)\nforall x (Sweptback(x) -> Bunglesome(x))\nforall x (Germinal(x) -> Antipodal(x))\n\nnot Amphoteric(stesha)\n\nnot Amphoteric(stesha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Teresita is grownup. Corie is tempting. Ronny is reddish. Praneetf is cheeselike. Green, reddish things are grownup. Furry, cheeselike things are reddish. Young things are grownup. If Ronny is pestilent and Ronny is comical then Ronny is grownup. If something is reddish then it is pestilent. If something is tempting then it is cheeselike. Teresita is capitulary.", "logic": "\nGrownup(teresita)\nTempting(corie)\nReddish(ronny)\nCheeselike(praneetf)\nforall x (Comical(x) and Reddish(x) -> Grownup(x))\nforall x (Tempting(x) and Cheeselike(x) -> Reddish(x))\nforall x (Capitulary(x) -> Grownup(x))\nPestilent(ronny) and Comical(ronny) -> Grownup(ronny)\nforall x (Reddish(x) -> Pestilent(x))\nforall x (Tempting(x) -> Cheeselike(x))\n\nCapitulary(teresita)\n\nCapitulary(teresita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-528"} {"premises": "Margareta is xxxv. Margareta is boney. Margareta is crosstown. Margareta is not formative. Margareta is springlike. Margareta is laboring. Hinda is not xxxv. Hinda is boney. Hinda is formative. Izabel is laboring. If something is springlike and not boney then it is not epigastric. All xxxv things are epigastric. If something is crosstown and laboring then it is xxxv. If something is laboring then it is crosstown. Nice things are springlike. If Hinda is laboring and Hinda is not springlike then Hinda is not epigastric. Margareta is not formative.", "logic": "\nXxxv(margareta)\nBoney(margareta)\nCrosstown(margareta)\nnot Formative(margareta)\nSpringlike(margareta)\nLaboring(margareta)\nnot Xxxv(hinda)\nBoney(hinda)\nFormative(hinda)\nLaboring(izabel)\nforall x (Springlike(x) and not Boney(x) -> not Epigastric(x))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) -> Epigastric(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) and Laboring(x) -> Xxxv(x))\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Crosstown(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> Springlike(x))\nLaboring(hinda) and not Springlike(hinda) -> not Epigastric(hinda)\n\nnot Formative(margareta)\n\ntherefore not Formative(margareta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Florian is sheer. Florian is aphanitic. Florian is activated. Florian is not expository. Florian is liked. Florian is funny. Ardelia is not sheer. Ardelia is aphanitic. Ardelia is expository. Osbourn is funny. If something is liked and not aphanitic then it is not ternate. All sheer things are ternate. If something is activated and funny then it is sheer. If something is funny then it is activated. Nice things are liked. If Ardelia is funny and Ardelia is not liked then Ardelia is not ternate. Ardelia is not expository.", "logic": "\nSheer(florian)\nAphanitic(florian)\nActivated(florian)\nnot Expository(florian)\nLiked(florian)\nFunny(florian)\nnot Sheer(ardelia)\nAphanitic(ardelia)\nExpository(ardelia)\nFunny(osbourn)\nforall x (Liked(x) and not Aphanitic(x) -> not Ternate(x))\nforall x (Sheer(x) -> Ternate(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) and Funny(x) -> Sheer(x))\nforall x (Funny(x) -> Activated(x))\nforall x (Activated(x) -> Liked(x))\nFunny(ardelia) and not Liked(ardelia) -> not Ternate(ardelia)\n\nnot Expository(ardelia)\n\ntherefore Expository(ardelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Kelly is acerbic. Kelly is frivolous. Kelly is prismatic. Kelly is not rearmost. Kelly is stunning. Kelly is cruciate. Waite is not acerbic. Waite is frivolous. Waite is rearmost. Jay is cruciate. If something is stunning and not frivolous then it is not rimeless. All acerbic things are rimeless. If something is prismatic and cruciate then it is acerbic. If something is cruciate then it is prismatic. Nice things are stunning. If Waite is cruciate and Waite is not stunning then Waite is not rimeless. Jay is prismatic.", "logic": "\nAcerbic(kelly)\nFrivolous(kelly)\nPrismatic(kelly)\nnot Rearmost(kelly)\nStunning(kelly)\nCruciate(kelly)\nnot Acerbic(waite)\nFrivolous(waite)\nRearmost(waite)\nCruciate(jay)\nforall x (Stunning(x) and not Frivolous(x) -> not Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Acerbic(x) -> Rimeless(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) and Cruciate(x) -> Acerbic(x))\nforall x (Cruciate(x) -> Prismatic(x))\nforall x (Prismatic(x) -> Stunning(x))\nCruciate(waite) and not Stunning(waite) -> not Rimeless(waite)\n\nPrismatic(jay)\n\nCruciate(jay) and forall x (Cruciate(x) -> Prismatic(x)) -> therefore Prismatic(jay)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Ethyl is contiguous. Ethyl is imperative. Ethyl is carmine. Ethyl is not indigenous. Ethyl is versed. Ethyl is nosed. Leon is not contiguous. Leon is imperative. Leon is indigenous. Henrietta is nosed. If something is versed and not imperative then it is not tonic. All contiguous things are tonic. If something is carmine and nosed then it is contiguous. If something is nosed then it is carmine. Nice things are versed. If Leon is nosed and Leon is not versed then Leon is not tonic. Henrietta is not carmine.", "logic": "\nContiguous(ethyl)\nImperative(ethyl)\nCarmine(ethyl)\nnot Indigenous(ethyl)\nVersed(ethyl)\nNosed(ethyl)\nnot Contiguous(leon)\nImperative(leon)\nIndigenous(leon)\nNosed(henrietta)\nforall x (Versed(x) and not Imperative(x) -> not Tonic(x))\nforall x (Contiguous(x) -> Tonic(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x) and Nosed(x) -> Contiguous(x))\nforall x (Nosed(x) -> Carmine(x))\nforall x (Carmine(x) -> Versed(x))\nNosed(leon) and not Versed(leon) -> not Tonic(leon)\n\nnot Carmine(henrietta)\n\nNosed(henrietta) and forall x (Nosed(x) -> Carmine(x)) -> therefore Carmine(henrietta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Lauryn is girlish. Lauryn is titulary. Lauryn is sable. Lauryn is not burundian. Lauryn is aculeate. Lauryn is brash. Sonni is not girlish. Sonni is titulary. Sonni is burundian. Chriss is brash. If something is aculeate and not titulary then it is not snarled. All girlish things are snarled. If something is sable and brash then it is girlish. If something is brash then it is sable. Nice things are aculeate. If Sonni is brash and Sonni is not aculeate then Sonni is not snarled. Chriss is girlish.", "logic": "\nGirlish(lauryn)\nTitulary(lauryn)\nSable(lauryn)\nnot Burundian(lauryn)\nAculeate(lauryn)\nBrash(lauryn)\nnot Girlish(sonni)\nTitulary(sonni)\nBurundian(sonni)\nBrash(chriss)\nforall x (Aculeate(x) and not Titulary(x) -> not Snarled(x))\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Snarled(x))\nforall x (Sable(x) and Brash(x) -> Girlish(x))\nforall x (Brash(x) -> Sable(x))\nforall x (Sable(x) -> Aculeate(x))\nBrash(sonni) and not Aculeate(sonni) -> not Snarled(sonni)\n\nGirlish(chriss)\n\nBrash(chriss) and forall x (Brash(x) -> Sable(x)) -> therefore Sable(chriss) Sable(chriss) and Brash(chriss) and forall x (Sable(x) and Brash(x) -> Girlish(x)) -> therefore Girlish(chriss)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Avie is unrelaxed. Avie is shagged. Avie is hermetic. Avie is not sweptwing. Avie is olympic. Avie is falcate. Mareah is not unrelaxed. Mareah is shagged. Mareah is sweptwing. Chase is falcate. If something is olympic and not shagged then it is not aphasic. All unrelaxed things are aphasic. If something is hermetic and falcate then it is unrelaxed. If something is falcate then it is hermetic. Nice things are olympic. If Mareah is falcate and Mareah is not olympic then Mareah is not aphasic. Chase is not olympic.", "logic": "\nUnrelaxed(avie)\nShagged(avie)\nHermetic(avie)\nnot Sweptwing(avie)\nOlympic(avie)\nFalcate(avie)\nnot Unrelaxed(mareah)\nShagged(mareah)\nSweptwing(mareah)\nFalcate(chase)\nforall x (Olympic(x) and not Shagged(x) -> not Aphasic(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) -> Aphasic(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) and Falcate(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Falcate(x) -> Hermetic(x))\nforall x (Hermetic(x) -> Olympic(x))\nFalcate(mareah) and not Olympic(mareah) -> not Aphasic(mareah)\n\nnot Olympic(chase)\n\nFalcate(chase) and forall x (Falcate(x) -> Hermetic(x)) -> therefore Hermetic(chase) Hermetic(chase) and forall x (Hermetic(x) -> Olympic(x)) -> therefore Olympic(chase)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Ethelin is insular. Ethelin is damaging. Ethelin is visualised. Ethelin is not frigorific. Ethelin is cormose. Ethelin is slurred. Stern is not insular. Stern is damaging. Stern is frigorific. Storey is slurred. If something is cormose and not damaging then it is not pyramidal. All insular things are pyramidal. If something is visualised and slurred then it is insular. If something is slurred then it is visualised. Nice things are cormose. If Stern is slurred and Stern is not cormose then Stern is not pyramidal. Storey is pyramidal.", "logic": "\nInsular(ethelin)\nDamaging(ethelin)\nVisualised(ethelin)\nnot Frigorific(ethelin)\nCormose(ethelin)\nSlurred(ethelin)\nnot Insular(stern)\nDamaging(stern)\nFrigorific(stern)\nSlurred(storey)\nforall x (Cormose(x) and not Damaging(x) -> not Pyramidal(x))\nforall x (Insular(x) -> Pyramidal(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) and Slurred(x) -> Insular(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Visualised(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> Cormose(x))\nSlurred(stern) and not Cormose(stern) -> not Pyramidal(stern)\n\nPyramidal(storey)\n\nSlurred(storey) and forall x (Slurred(x) -> Visualised(x)) -> therefore Visualised(storey) Visualised(storey) and Slurred(storey) and forall x (Visualised(x) and Slurred(x) -> Insular(x)) -> therefore Insular(storey) Insular(storey) and forall x (Insular(x) -> Pyramidal(x)) -> therefore Pyramidal(storey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Nathalia is fencelike. Nathalia is writhing. Nathalia is stern. Nathalia is not ordered. Nathalia is umptieth. Nathalia is doubtful. Bea is not fencelike. Bea is writhing. Bea is ordered. Zea is doubtful. If something is umptieth and not writhing then it is not floaty. All fencelike things are floaty. If something is stern and doubtful then it is fencelike. If something is doubtful then it is stern. Nice things are umptieth. If Bea is doubtful and Bea is not umptieth then Bea is not floaty. Zea is not floaty.", "logic": "\nFencelike(nathalia)\nWrithing(nathalia)\nStern(nathalia)\nnot Ordered(nathalia)\nUmptieth(nathalia)\nDoubtful(nathalia)\nnot Fencelike(bea)\nWrithing(bea)\nOrdered(bea)\nDoubtful(zea)\nforall x (Umptieth(x) and not Writhing(x) -> not Floaty(x))\nforall x (Fencelike(x) -> Floaty(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Fencelike(x))\nforall x (Doubtful(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Stern(x) -> Umptieth(x))\nDoubtful(bea) and not Umptieth(bea) -> not Floaty(bea)\n\nnot Floaty(zea)\n\nDoubtful(zea) and forall x (Doubtful(x) -> Stern(x)) -> therefore Stern(zea) Stern(zea) and Doubtful(zea) and forall x (Stern(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Fencelike(x)) -> therefore Fencelike(zea) Fencelike(zea) and forall x (Fencelike(x) -> Floaty(x)) -> therefore Floaty(zea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Lily is piddling. Lily is potbellied. Lily is hindering. Lily is not genteel. Lily is freehanded. Lily is ferrous. Zolly is not piddling. Zolly is potbellied. Zolly is genteel. Charita is ferrous. If something is freehanded and not potbellied then it is not rocky. All piddling things are rocky. If something is hindering and ferrous then it is piddling. If something is ferrous then it is hindering. Nice things are freehanded. If Zolly is ferrous and Zolly is not freehanded then Zolly is not rocky. Zolly is not hindering.", "logic": "\nPiddling(lily)\nPotbellied(lily)\nHindering(lily)\nnot Genteel(lily)\nFreehanded(lily)\nFerrous(lily)\nnot Piddling(zolly)\nPotbellied(zolly)\nGenteel(zolly)\nFerrous(charita)\nforall x (Freehanded(x) and not Potbellied(x) -> not Rocky(x))\nforall x (Piddling(x) -> Rocky(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) and Ferrous(x) -> Piddling(x))\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Hindering(x))\nforall x (Hindering(x) -> Freehanded(x))\nFerrous(zolly) and not Freehanded(zolly) -> not Rocky(zolly)\n\nnot Hindering(zolly)\n\nforall x (Ferrous(x) -> Hindering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Aigneis is tenebrous. Aigneis is brimless. Aigneis is slaty. Aigneis is not comforted. Aigneis is recurvate. Aigneis is victimized. Marco is not tenebrous. Marco is brimless. Marco is comforted. Englebart is victimized. If something is recurvate and not brimless then it is not stunted. All tenebrous things are stunted. If something is slaty and victimized then it is tenebrous. If something is victimized then it is slaty. Nice things are recurvate. If Marco is victimized and Marco is not recurvate then Marco is not stunted. Marco is stunted.", "logic": "\nTenebrous(aigneis)\nBrimless(aigneis)\nSlaty(aigneis)\nnot Comforted(aigneis)\nRecurvate(aigneis)\nVictimized(aigneis)\nnot Tenebrous(marco)\nBrimless(marco)\nComforted(marco)\nVictimized(englebart)\nforall x (Recurvate(x) and not Brimless(x) -> not Stunted(x))\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Stunted(x))\nforall x (Slaty(x) and Victimized(x) -> Tenebrous(x))\nforall x (Victimized(x) -> Slaty(x))\nforall x (Slaty(x) -> Recurvate(x))\nVictimized(marco) and not Recurvate(marco) -> not Stunted(marco)\n\nStunted(marco)\n\nforall x (Tenebrous(x) -> Stunted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Henrique is abomasal. Henrique is inborn. Henrique is outbred. Henrique is not carroty. Henrique is soldierly. Henrique is collateral. Anya is not abomasal. Anya is inborn. Anya is carroty. Elvina is collateral. If something is soldierly and not inborn then it is not excusatory. All abomasal things are excusatory. If something is outbred and collateral then it is abomasal. If something is collateral then it is outbred. Nice things are soldierly. If Anya is collateral and Anya is not soldierly then Anya is not excusatory. Anya is not soldierly.", "logic": "\nAbomasal(henrique)\nInborn(henrique)\nOutbred(henrique)\nnot Carroty(henrique)\nSoldierly(henrique)\nCollateral(henrique)\nnot Abomasal(anya)\nInborn(anya)\nCarroty(anya)\nCollateral(elvina)\nforall x (Soldierly(x) and not Inborn(x) -> not Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Abomasal(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nforall x (Outbred(x) and Collateral(x) -> Abomasal(x))\nforall x (Collateral(x) -> Outbred(x))\nforall x (Outbred(x) -> Soldierly(x))\nCollateral(anya) and not Soldierly(anya) -> not Excusatory(anya)\n\nnot Soldierly(anya)\n\nforall x (Outbred(x) -> Soldierly(x)) <- forall x (Collateral(x) -> Outbred(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Cooper is nodulated. Cooper is twisting. Cooper is devotional. Cooper is not binominal. Cooper is unrevived. Cooper is lofty. Zane is not nodulated. Zane is twisting. Zane is binominal. Tyrone is lofty. If something is unrevived and not twisting then it is not adagio. All nodulated things are adagio. If something is devotional and lofty then it is nodulated. If something is lofty then it is devotional. Nice things are unrevived. If Zane is lofty and Zane is not unrevived then Zane is not adagio. Zane is lofty.", "logic": "\nNodulated(cooper)\nTwisting(cooper)\nDevotional(cooper)\nnot Binominal(cooper)\nUnrevived(cooper)\nLofty(cooper)\nnot Nodulated(zane)\nTwisting(zane)\nBinominal(zane)\nLofty(tyrone)\nforall x (Unrevived(x) and not Twisting(x) -> not Adagio(x))\nforall x (Nodulated(x) -> Adagio(x))\nforall x (Devotional(x) and Lofty(x) -> Nodulated(x))\nforall x (Lofty(x) -> Devotional(x))\nforall x (Devotional(x) -> Unrevived(x))\nLofty(zane) and not Unrevived(zane) -> not Adagio(zane)\n\nLofty(zane)\n\nLofty(zane) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Karlee is formulary. Karlee is slithering. Karlee is jubilant. Karlee is not numinous. Karlee is available. Karlee is enamored. Caresse is not formulary. Caresse is slithering. Caresse is numinous. Else is enamored. If something is available and not slithering then it is not tricolor. All formulary things are tricolor. If something is jubilant and enamored then it is formulary. If something is enamored then it is jubilant. Nice things are available. If Caresse is enamored and Caresse is not available then Caresse is not tricolor. Else is not numinous.", "logic": "\nFormulary(karlee)\nSlithering(karlee)\nJubilant(karlee)\nnot Numinous(karlee)\nAvailable(karlee)\nEnamored(karlee)\nnot Formulary(caresse)\nSlithering(caresse)\nNuminous(caresse)\nEnamored(else)\nforall x (Available(x) and not Slithering(x) -> not Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Formulary(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) and Enamored(x) -> Formulary(x))\nforall x (Enamored(x) -> Jubilant(x))\nforall x (Jubilant(x) -> Available(x))\nEnamored(caresse) and not Available(caresse) -> not Tricolor(caresse)\n\nnot Numinous(else)\n\nnot Numinous(else) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Nerte is tonguelike. Nerte is nameless. Nerte is earliest. Nerte is not cordial. Nerte is bluish. Nerte is visaged. Gwenn is not tonguelike. Gwenn is nameless. Gwenn is cordial. Gerrard is visaged. If something is bluish and not nameless then it is not pithy. All tonguelike things are pithy. If something is earliest and visaged then it is tonguelike. If something is visaged then it is earliest. Nice things are bluish. If Gwenn is visaged and Gwenn is not bluish then Gwenn is not pithy. Gerrard is nameless.", "logic": "\nTonguelike(nerte)\nNameless(nerte)\nEarliest(nerte)\nnot Cordial(nerte)\nBluish(nerte)\nVisaged(nerte)\nnot Tonguelike(gwenn)\nNameless(gwenn)\nCordial(gwenn)\nVisaged(gerrard)\nforall x (Bluish(x) and not Nameless(x) -> not Pithy(x))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Pithy(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) and Visaged(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Visaged(x) -> Earliest(x))\nforall x (Earliest(x) -> Bluish(x))\nVisaged(gwenn) and not Bluish(gwenn) -> not Pithy(gwenn)\n\nNameless(gerrard)\n\nNameless(gerrard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-148"} {"premises": "Odessa is sound. Odessa is avirulent. Odessa is cuspidal. Odessa is sculptural. Odessa is complex. Odessa is broadleaf. Nerte is sound. Nerte is lowest. Tallia is sound. Tallia is avirulent. Tallia is cuspidal. Tallia is sculptural. Tallia is complex. Tallia is broadleaf. Tallia is lowest. If Tallia is cuspidal then Tallia is complex. If Odessa is avirulent and Odessa is cuspidal then Odessa is broadleaf. Green, sound things are sculptural. All lowest things are sound. If something is avirulent then it is lowest. Big things are cuspidal. All complex, sculptural things are cuspidal. If something is sound and sculptural then it is broadleaf. Tallia is broadleaf.", "logic": "\nSound(odessa)\nAvirulent(odessa)\nCuspidal(odessa)\nSculptural(odessa)\nComplex(odessa)\nBroadleaf(odessa)\nSound(nerte)\nLowest(nerte)\nSound(tallia)\nAvirulent(tallia)\nCuspidal(tallia)\nSculptural(tallia)\nComplex(tallia)\nBroadleaf(tallia)\nLowest(tallia)\nCuspidal(tallia) -> Complex(tallia)\nAvirulent(odessa) and Cuspidal(odessa) -> Broadleaf(odessa)\nforall x (Cuspidal(x) and Sound(x) -> Sculptural(x))\nforall x (Lowest(x) -> Sound(x))\nforall x (Avirulent(x) -> Lowest(x))\nforall x (Sound(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Complex(x) and Sculptural(x) -> Cuspidal(x))\nforall x (Sound(x) and Sculptural(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\n\nBroadleaf(tallia)\n\ntherefore Broadleaf(tallia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Steffane is workable. Steffane is saccadic. Steffane is spiffing. Steffane is plethoric. Steffane is wavering. Steffane is bohemian. Cynthy is workable. Cynthy is genteel. Antonino is workable. Antonino is saccadic. Antonino is spiffing. Antonino is plethoric. Antonino is wavering. Antonino is bohemian. Antonino is genteel. If Antonino is spiffing then Antonino is wavering. If Steffane is saccadic and Steffane is spiffing then Steffane is bohemian. Green, workable things are plethoric. All genteel things are workable. If something is saccadic then it is genteel. Big things are spiffing. All wavering, plethoric things are spiffing. If something is workable and plethoric then it is bohemian. Steffane is not wavering.", "logic": "\nWorkable(steffane)\nSaccadic(steffane)\nSpiffing(steffane)\nPlethoric(steffane)\nWavering(steffane)\nBohemian(steffane)\nWorkable(cynthy)\nGenteel(cynthy)\nWorkable(antonino)\nSaccadic(antonino)\nSpiffing(antonino)\nPlethoric(antonino)\nWavering(antonino)\nBohemian(antonino)\nGenteel(antonino)\nSpiffing(antonino) -> Wavering(antonino)\nSaccadic(steffane) and Spiffing(steffane) -> Bohemian(steffane)\nforall x (Spiffing(x) and Workable(x) -> Plethoric(x))\nforall x (Genteel(x) -> Workable(x))\nforall x (Saccadic(x) -> Genteel(x))\nforall x (Workable(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nforall x (Wavering(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Spiffing(x))\nforall x (Workable(x) and Plethoric(x) -> Bohemian(x))\n\nnot Wavering(steffane)\n\ntherefore Wavering(steffane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Clara is agitating. Clara is throaty. Clara is precarious. Clara is bogartian. Clara is tiny. Clara is attenuate. Latashia is agitating. Latashia is heavyset. Northrup is agitating. Northrup is throaty. Northrup is precarious. Northrup is bogartian. Northrup is tiny. Northrup is attenuate. Northrup is heavyset. If Northrup is precarious then Northrup is tiny. If Clara is throaty and Clara is precarious then Clara is attenuate. Green, agitating things are bogartian. All heavyset things are agitating. If something is throaty then it is heavyset. Big things are precarious. All tiny, bogartian things are precarious. If something is agitating and bogartian then it is attenuate. Latashia is precarious.", "logic": "\nAgitating(clara)\nThroaty(clara)\nPrecarious(clara)\nBogartian(clara)\nTiny(clara)\nAttenuate(clara)\nAgitating(latashia)\nHeavyset(latashia)\nAgitating(northrup)\nThroaty(northrup)\nPrecarious(northrup)\nBogartian(northrup)\nTiny(northrup)\nAttenuate(northrup)\nHeavyset(northrup)\nPrecarious(northrup) -> Tiny(northrup)\nThroaty(clara) and Precarious(clara) -> Attenuate(clara)\nforall x (Precarious(x) and Agitating(x) -> Bogartian(x))\nforall x (Heavyset(x) -> Agitating(x))\nforall x (Throaty(x) -> Heavyset(x))\nforall x (Agitating(x) -> Precarious(x))\nforall x (Tiny(x) and Bogartian(x) -> Precarious(x))\nforall x (Agitating(x) and Bogartian(x) -> Attenuate(x))\n\nPrecarious(latashia)\n\nAgitating(latashia) and forall x (Agitating(x) -> Precarious(x)) -> therefore Precarious(latashia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Fernanda is slumberous. Fernanda is plumate. Fernanda is uptight. Fernanda is gratuitous. Fernanda is chichi. Fernanda is inactive. Lyndel is slumberous. Lyndel is underway. Yigal is slumberous. Yigal is plumate. Yigal is uptight. Yigal is gratuitous. Yigal is chichi. Yigal is inactive. Yigal is underway. If Yigal is uptight then Yigal is chichi. If Fernanda is plumate and Fernanda is uptight then Fernanda is inactive. Green, slumberous things are gratuitous. All underway things are slumberous. If something is plumate then it is underway. Big things are uptight. All chichi, gratuitous things are uptight. If something is slumberous and gratuitous then it is inactive. Fernanda is not underway.", "logic": "\nSlumberous(fernanda)\nPlumate(fernanda)\nUptight(fernanda)\nGratuitous(fernanda)\nChichi(fernanda)\nInactive(fernanda)\nSlumberous(lyndel)\nUnderway(lyndel)\nSlumberous(yigal)\nPlumate(yigal)\nUptight(yigal)\nGratuitous(yigal)\nChichi(yigal)\nInactive(yigal)\nUnderway(yigal)\nUptight(yigal) -> Chichi(yigal)\nPlumate(fernanda) and Uptight(fernanda) -> Inactive(fernanda)\nforall x (Uptight(x) and Slumberous(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\nforall x (Underway(x) -> Slumberous(x))\nforall x (Plumate(x) -> Underway(x))\nforall x (Slumberous(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Chichi(x) and Gratuitous(x) -> Uptight(x))\nforall x (Slumberous(x) and Gratuitous(x) -> Inactive(x))\n\nnot Underway(fernanda)\n\nPlumate(fernanda) and forall x (Plumate(x) -> Underway(x)) -> therefore Underway(fernanda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Celia is unbridled. Celia is lowborn. Celia is animating. Celia is unpaired. Celia is gibbous. Celia is chipper. Knox is unbridled. Knox is conceptual. Sheril is unbridled. Sheril is lowborn. Sheril is animating. Sheril is unpaired. Sheril is gibbous. Sheril is chipper. Sheril is conceptual. If Sheril is animating then Sheril is gibbous. If Celia is lowborn and Celia is animating then Celia is chipper. Green, unbridled things are unpaired. All conceptual things are unbridled. If something is lowborn then it is conceptual. Big things are animating. All gibbous, unpaired things are animating. If something is unbridled and unpaired then it is chipper. Knox is unpaired.", "logic": "\nUnbridled(celia)\nLowborn(celia)\nAnimating(celia)\nUnpaired(celia)\nGibbous(celia)\nChipper(celia)\nUnbridled(knox)\nConceptual(knox)\nUnbridled(sheril)\nLowborn(sheril)\nAnimating(sheril)\nUnpaired(sheril)\nGibbous(sheril)\nChipper(sheril)\nConceptual(sheril)\nAnimating(sheril) -> Gibbous(sheril)\nLowborn(celia) and Animating(celia) -> Chipper(celia)\nforall x (Animating(x) and Unbridled(x) -> Unpaired(x))\nforall x (Conceptual(x) -> Unbridled(x))\nforall x (Lowborn(x) -> Conceptual(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) -> Animating(x))\nforall x (Gibbous(x) and Unpaired(x) -> Animating(x))\nforall x (Unbridled(x) and Unpaired(x) -> Chipper(x))\n\nUnpaired(knox)\n\nUnbridled(knox) and forall x (Unbridled(x) -> Animating(x)) -> therefore Animating(knox) Animating(knox) and Unbridled(knox) and forall x (Animating(x) and Unbridled(x) -> Unpaired(x)) -> therefore Unpaired(knox)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Aretha is imprecise. Aretha is liberian. Aretha is botchy. Aretha is ambiguous. Aretha is kenyan. Aretha is recyclable. Sly is imprecise. Sly is faced. Minetta is imprecise. Minetta is liberian. Minetta is botchy. Minetta is ambiguous. Minetta is kenyan. Minetta is recyclable. Minetta is faced. If Minetta is botchy then Minetta is kenyan. If Aretha is liberian and Aretha is botchy then Aretha is recyclable. Green, imprecise things are ambiguous. All faced things are imprecise. If something is liberian then it is faced. Big things are botchy. All kenyan, ambiguous things are botchy. If something is imprecise and ambiguous then it is recyclable. Sly is not ambiguous.", "logic": "\nImprecise(aretha)\nLiberian(aretha)\nBotchy(aretha)\nAmbiguous(aretha)\nKenyan(aretha)\nRecyclable(aretha)\nImprecise(sly)\nFaced(sly)\nImprecise(minetta)\nLiberian(minetta)\nBotchy(minetta)\nAmbiguous(minetta)\nKenyan(minetta)\nRecyclable(minetta)\nFaced(minetta)\nBotchy(minetta) -> Kenyan(minetta)\nLiberian(aretha) and Botchy(aretha) -> Recyclable(aretha)\nforall x (Botchy(x) and Imprecise(x) -> Ambiguous(x))\nforall x (Faced(x) -> Imprecise(x))\nforall x (Liberian(x) -> Faced(x))\nforall x (Imprecise(x) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Kenyan(x) and Ambiguous(x) -> Botchy(x))\nforall x (Imprecise(x) and Ambiguous(x) -> Recyclable(x))\n\nnot Ambiguous(sly)\n\nImprecise(sly) and forall x (Imprecise(x) -> Botchy(x)) -> therefore Botchy(sly) Botchy(sly) and Imprecise(sly) and forall x (Botchy(x) and Imprecise(x) -> Ambiguous(x)) -> therefore Ambiguous(sly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Erda is terete. Erda is annelid. Erda is lamented. Erda is siouan. Erda is diaphysial. Erda is uncousinly. Pauly is terete. Pauly is mandatory. Fredrick is terete. Fredrick is annelid. Fredrick is lamented. Fredrick is siouan. Fredrick is diaphysial. Fredrick is uncousinly. Fredrick is mandatory. If Fredrick is lamented then Fredrick is diaphysial. If Erda is annelid and Erda is lamented then Erda is uncousinly. Green, terete things are siouan. All mandatory things are terete. If something is annelid then it is mandatory. Big things are lamented. All diaphysial, siouan things are lamented. If something is terete and siouan then it is uncousinly. Pauly is uncousinly.", "logic": "\nTerete(erda)\nAnnelid(erda)\nLamented(erda)\nSiouan(erda)\nDiaphysial(erda)\nUncousinly(erda)\nTerete(pauly)\nMandatory(pauly)\nTerete(fredrick)\nAnnelid(fredrick)\nLamented(fredrick)\nSiouan(fredrick)\nDiaphysial(fredrick)\nUncousinly(fredrick)\nMandatory(fredrick)\nLamented(fredrick) -> Diaphysial(fredrick)\nAnnelid(erda) and Lamented(erda) -> Uncousinly(erda)\nforall x (Lamented(x) and Terete(x) -> Siouan(x))\nforall x (Mandatory(x) -> Terete(x))\nforall x (Annelid(x) -> Mandatory(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) -> Lamented(x))\nforall x (Diaphysial(x) and Siouan(x) -> Lamented(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) and Siouan(x) -> Uncousinly(x))\n\nUncousinly(pauly)\n\nTerete(pauly) and forall x (Terete(x) -> Lamented(x)) -> therefore Lamented(pauly) Lamented(pauly) and Terete(pauly) and forall x (Lamented(x) and Terete(x) -> Siouan(x)) -> therefore Siouan(pauly) Terete(pauly) and Siouan(pauly) and forall x (Terete(x) and Siouan(x) -> Uncousinly(x)) -> therefore Uncousinly(pauly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Vachel is peaty. Vachel is estuarine. Vachel is ablaze. Vachel is paltry. Vachel is branded. Vachel is concealing. Oral is peaty. Oral is synoecious. Perri is peaty. Perri is estuarine. Perri is ablaze. Perri is paltry. Perri is branded. Perri is concealing. Perri is synoecious. If Perri is ablaze then Perri is branded. If Vachel is estuarine and Vachel is ablaze then Vachel is concealing. Green, peaty things are paltry. All synoecious things are peaty. If something is estuarine then it is synoecious. Big things are ablaze. All branded, paltry things are ablaze. If something is peaty and paltry then it is concealing. Oral is not concealing.", "logic": "\nPeaty(vachel)\nEstuarine(vachel)\nAblaze(vachel)\nPaltry(vachel)\nBranded(vachel)\nConcealing(vachel)\nPeaty(oral)\nSynoecious(oral)\nPeaty(perri)\nEstuarine(perri)\nAblaze(perri)\nPaltry(perri)\nBranded(perri)\nConcealing(perri)\nSynoecious(perri)\nAblaze(perri) -> Branded(perri)\nEstuarine(vachel) and Ablaze(vachel) -> Concealing(vachel)\nforall x (Ablaze(x) and Peaty(x) -> Paltry(x))\nforall x (Synoecious(x) -> Peaty(x))\nforall x (Estuarine(x) -> Synoecious(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) -> Ablaze(x))\nforall x (Branded(x) and Paltry(x) -> Ablaze(x))\nforall x (Peaty(x) and Paltry(x) -> Concealing(x))\n\nnot Concealing(oral)\n\nPeaty(oral) and forall x (Peaty(x) -> Ablaze(x)) -> therefore Ablaze(oral) Ablaze(oral) and Peaty(oral) and forall x (Ablaze(x) and Peaty(x) -> Paltry(x)) -> therefore Paltry(oral) Peaty(oral) and Paltry(oral) and forall x (Peaty(x) and Paltry(x) -> Concealing(x)) -> therefore Concealing(oral)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Lou is tempting. Lou is prenominal. Lou is spicy. Lou is scruffy. Lou is admittible. Lou is noetic. Nolan is tempting. Nolan is periwigged. Ruperto is tempting. Ruperto is prenominal. Ruperto is spicy. Ruperto is scruffy. Ruperto is admittible. Ruperto is noetic. Ruperto is periwigged. If Ruperto is spicy then Ruperto is admittible. If Lou is prenominal and Lou is spicy then Lou is noetic. Green, tempting things are scruffy. All periwigged things are tempting. If something is prenominal then it is periwigged. Big things are spicy. All admittible, scruffy things are spicy. If something is tempting and scruffy then it is noetic. Nolan is not prenominal.", "logic": "\nTempting(lou)\nPrenominal(lou)\nSpicy(lou)\nScruffy(lou)\nAdmittible(lou)\nNoetic(lou)\nTempting(nolan)\nPeriwigged(nolan)\nTempting(ruperto)\nPrenominal(ruperto)\nSpicy(ruperto)\nScruffy(ruperto)\nAdmittible(ruperto)\nNoetic(ruperto)\nPeriwigged(ruperto)\nSpicy(ruperto) -> Admittible(ruperto)\nPrenominal(lou) and Spicy(lou) -> Noetic(lou)\nforall x (Spicy(x) and Tempting(x) -> Scruffy(x))\nforall x (Periwigged(x) -> Tempting(x))\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Periwigged(x))\nforall x (Tempting(x) -> Spicy(x))\nforall x (Admittible(x) and Scruffy(x) -> Spicy(x))\nforall x (Tempting(x) and Scruffy(x) -> Noetic(x))\n\nnot Prenominal(nolan)\n\nnot Prenominal(nolan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "Karalynn is misbranded. Karalynn is greatest. Karalynn is worsened. Karalynn is handled. Karalynn is keeled. Karalynn is freehanded. Kristan is misbranded. Kristan is geologic. Carlina is misbranded. Carlina is greatest. Carlina is worsened. Carlina is handled. Carlina is keeled. Carlina is freehanded. Carlina is geologic. If Carlina is worsened then Carlina is keeled. If Karalynn is greatest and Karalynn is worsened then Karalynn is freehanded. Green, misbranded things are handled. All geologic things are misbranded. If something is greatest then it is geologic. Big things are worsened. All keeled, handled things are worsened. If something is misbranded and handled then it is freehanded. Kristan is keeled.", "logic": "\nMisbranded(karalynn)\nGreatest(karalynn)\nWorsened(karalynn)\nHandled(karalynn)\nKeeled(karalynn)\nFreehanded(karalynn)\nMisbranded(kristan)\nGeologic(kristan)\nMisbranded(carlina)\nGreatest(carlina)\nWorsened(carlina)\nHandled(carlina)\nKeeled(carlina)\nFreehanded(carlina)\nGeologic(carlina)\nWorsened(carlina) -> Keeled(carlina)\nGreatest(karalynn) and Worsened(karalynn) -> Freehanded(karalynn)\nforall x (Worsened(x) and Misbranded(x) -> Handled(x))\nforall x (Geologic(x) -> Misbranded(x))\nforall x (Greatest(x) -> Geologic(x))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) -> Worsened(x))\nforall x (Keeled(x) and Handled(x) -> Worsened(x))\nforall x (Misbranded(x) and Handled(x) -> Freehanded(x))\n\nKeeled(kristan)\n\nKeeled(kristan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1932"} {"premises": "The kenn is piercing. The heidie hydrolise the kenn. The heidie oxygenise the kenn. The heidie is foppish. The heidie is eccrine. The heidie is subdural. The heidie cark the kenn. If something hydrolise the heidie then the heidie hydrolise the kenn. If something is subdural then it cark the kenn. If something cark the kenn then it hydrolise the heidie. If the kenn oxygenise the heidie and the heidie cark the kenn then the heidie hydrolise the kenn. If something cark the kenn and it hydrolise the heidie then the kenn is climactic. If something hydrolise the heidie and it is foppish then it cark the heidie. The heidie is subdural.", "logic": "\nPiercing(kenn)\nHydrolise(heidie, kenn)\nOxygenise(heidie, kenn)\nFoppish(heidie)\nEccrine(heidie)\nSubdural(heidie)\nCark(heidie, kenn)\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, heidie) -> Hydrolise(heidie, kenn))\nforall x (Subdural(x) -> Cark(x, kenn))\nforall x (Cark(x, kenn) -> Hydrolise(x, heidie))\nOxygenise(kenn, heidie) and Cark(heidie, kenn) -> Hydrolise(heidie, kenn)\nforall x (Cark(x, kenn) and Hydrolise(x, heidie) -> Climactic(kenn))\nforall x (Hydrolise(x, heidie) and Foppish(x) -> Cark(x, heidie))\n\nSubdural(heidie)\n\ntherefore Subdural(heidie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "The zed is erudite. The michell whirl the zed. The michell taint the zed. The michell is bandaged. The michell is condemning. The michell is general. The michell decolorise the zed. If something whirl the michell then the michell whirl the zed. If something is general then it decolorise the zed. If something decolorise the zed then it whirl the michell. If the zed taint the michell and the michell decolorise the zed then the michell whirl the zed. If something decolorise the zed and it whirl the michell then the zed is eutrophic. If something whirl the michell and it is bandaged then it decolorise the michell. The michell is not condemning.", "logic": "\nErudite(zed)\nWhirl(michell, zed)\nTaint(michell, zed)\nBandaged(michell)\nCondemning(michell)\nGeneral(michell)\nDecolorise(michell, zed)\nforall x (Whirl(x, michell) -> Whirl(michell, zed))\nforall x (General(x) -> Decolorise(x, zed))\nforall x (Decolorise(x, zed) -> Whirl(x, michell))\nTaint(zed, michell) and Decolorise(michell, zed) -> Whirl(michell, zed)\nforall x (Decolorise(x, zed) and Whirl(x, michell) -> Eutrophic(zed))\nforall x (Whirl(x, michell) and Bandaged(x) -> Decolorise(x, michell))\n\nnot Condemning(michell)\n\ntherefore Condemning(michell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "The ingeberg is cardinal. The florie rhyme the ingeberg. The florie abut the ingeberg. The florie is wheezing. The florie is notable. The florie is livery. The florie board the ingeberg. If something rhyme the florie then the florie rhyme the ingeberg. If something is livery then it board the ingeberg. If something board the ingeberg then it rhyme the florie. If the ingeberg abut the florie and the florie board the ingeberg then the florie rhyme the ingeberg. If something board the ingeberg and it rhyme the florie then the ingeberg is cryonic. If something rhyme the florie and it is wheezing then it board the florie. The ingeberg does not chase the florie.", "logic": "\nCardinal(ingeberg)\nRhyme(florie, ingeberg)\nAbut(florie, ingeberg)\nWheezing(florie)\nNotable(florie)\nLivery(florie)\nBoard(florie, ingeberg)\nforall x (Rhyme(x, florie) -> Rhyme(florie, ingeberg))\nforall x (Livery(x) -> Board(x, ingeberg))\nforall x (Board(x, ingeberg) -> Rhyme(x, florie))\nAbut(ingeberg, florie) and Board(florie, ingeberg) -> Rhyme(florie, ingeberg)\nforall x (Board(x, ingeberg) and Rhyme(x, florie) -> Cryonic(ingeberg))\nforall x (Rhyme(x, florie) and Wheezing(x) -> Board(x, florie))\n\nnot Rhyme(ingeberg, florie)\n\nforall x (Board(x, ingeberg) -> Rhyme(x, florie)) <- forall x (Livery(x) -> Board(x, ingeberg)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "The malory is artless. The istvan inosculate the malory. The istvan endear the malory. The istvan is snuffling. The istvan is hundred. The istvan is befouled. The istvan vaunt the malory. If something inosculate the istvan then the istvan inosculate the malory. If something is befouled then it vaunt the malory. If something vaunt the malory then it inosculate the istvan. If the malory endear the istvan and the istvan vaunt the malory then the istvan inosculate the malory. If something vaunt the malory and it inosculate the istvan then the malory is bulbaceous. If something inosculate the istvan and it is snuffling then it vaunt the istvan. The malory is befouled.", "logic": "\nArtless(malory)\nInosculate(istvan, malory)\nEndear(istvan, malory)\nSnuffling(istvan)\nHundred(istvan)\nBefouled(istvan)\nVaunt(istvan, malory)\nforall x (Inosculate(x, istvan) -> Inosculate(istvan, malory))\nforall x (Befouled(x) -> Vaunt(x, malory))\nforall x (Vaunt(x, malory) -> Inosculate(x, istvan))\nEndear(malory, istvan) and Vaunt(istvan, malory) -> Inosculate(istvan, malory)\nforall x (Vaunt(x, malory) and Inosculate(x, istvan) -> Bulbaceous(malory))\nforall x (Inosculate(x, istvan) and Snuffling(x) -> Vaunt(x, istvan))\n\nBefouled(malory)\n\nBefouled(malory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4935"} {"premises": "Endora is stinking. Endora is afghan. Endora is fashioned. Endora is roiled. Endora is unremedied. Endora is liquid. Erda is afghan. Erda is fashioned. Erda is roiled. Erda is gallican. Erda is unremedied. Erda is liquid. Nil is stinking. Nil is fashioned. Nil is roiled. Round, liquid people are fashioned. If someone is roiled then they are liquid. All fashioned, liquid people are unremedied. If someone is roiled and gallican then they are stinking. Young people are stinking. If someone is roiled and unremedied then they are afghan. Erda is unremedied.", "logic": "\nStinking(endora)\nAfghan(endora)\nFashioned(endora)\nRoiled(endora)\nUnremedied(endora)\nLiquid(endora)\nAfghan(erda)\nFashioned(erda)\nRoiled(erda)\nGallican(erda)\nUnremedied(erda)\nLiquid(erda)\nStinking(nil)\nFashioned(nil)\nRoiled(nil)\nforall x (Gallican(x) and Liquid(x) -> Fashioned(x))\nforall x (Roiled(x) -> Liquid(x))\nforall x (Fashioned(x) and Liquid(x) -> Unremedied(x))\nforall x (Roiled(x) and Gallican(x) -> Stinking(x))\nforall x (Liquid(x) -> Stinking(x))\nforall x (Roiled(x) and Unremedied(x) -> Afghan(x))\n\nUnremedied(erda)\n\ntherefore Unremedied(erda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Danella is contrary. Danella is artesian. Danella is diachronic. Danella is undefined. Danella is barricaded. Danella is unbolted. Dianna is artesian. Dianna is diachronic. Dianna is undefined. Dianna is sweptback. Dianna is barricaded. Dianna is unbolted. Miriam is contrary. Miriam is diachronic. Miriam is undefined. Round, unbolted people are diachronic. If someone is undefined then they are unbolted. All diachronic, unbolted people are barricaded. If someone is undefined and sweptback then they are contrary. Young people are contrary. If someone is undefined and barricaded then they are artesian. Danella is not contrary.", "logic": "\nContrary(danella)\nArtesian(danella)\nDiachronic(danella)\nUndefined(danella)\nBarricaded(danella)\nUnbolted(danella)\nArtesian(dianna)\nDiachronic(dianna)\nUndefined(dianna)\nSweptback(dianna)\nBarricaded(dianna)\nUnbolted(dianna)\nContrary(miriam)\nDiachronic(miriam)\nUndefined(miriam)\nforall x (Sweptback(x) and Unbolted(x) -> Diachronic(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) -> Unbolted(x))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) and Unbolted(x) -> Barricaded(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) and Sweptback(x) -> Contrary(x))\nforall x (Unbolted(x) -> Contrary(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) and Barricaded(x) -> Artesian(x))\n\nnot Contrary(danella)\n\ntherefore Contrary(danella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Denice is general. Denice is abient. Denice is coppery. Denice is historical. Denice is spinnable. Denice is inflowing. Sigfrid is abient. Sigfrid is coppery. Sigfrid is historical. Sigfrid is aflicker. Sigfrid is spinnable. Sigfrid is inflowing. Prue is general. Prue is coppery. Prue is historical. Round, inflowing people are coppery. If someone is historical then they are inflowing. All coppery, inflowing people are spinnable. If someone is historical and aflicker then they are general. Young people are general. If someone is historical and spinnable then they are abient. Sigfrid is general.", "logic": "\nGeneral(denice)\nAbient(denice)\nCoppery(denice)\nHistorical(denice)\nSpinnable(denice)\nInflowing(denice)\nAbient(sigfrid)\nCoppery(sigfrid)\nHistorical(sigfrid)\nAflicker(sigfrid)\nSpinnable(sigfrid)\nInflowing(sigfrid)\nGeneral(prue)\nCoppery(prue)\nHistorical(prue)\nforall x (Aflicker(x) and Inflowing(x) -> Coppery(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) -> Inflowing(x))\nforall x (Coppery(x) and Inflowing(x) -> Spinnable(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) and Aflicker(x) -> General(x))\nforall x (Inflowing(x) -> General(x))\nforall x (Historical(x) and Spinnable(x) -> Abient(x))\n\nGeneral(sigfrid)\n\nInflowing(sigfrid) and forall x (Inflowing(x) -> General(x)) -> therefore General(sigfrid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Ainslie is xviii. Ainslie is dampish. Ainslie is loveless. Ainslie is elder. Ainslie is accusive. Ainslie is niggardly. Ashton is dampish. Ashton is loveless. Ashton is elder. Ashton is baboonish. Ashton is accusive. Ashton is niggardly. Wendi is xviii. Wendi is loveless. Wendi is elder. Round, niggardly people are loveless. If someone is elder then they are niggardly. All loveless, niggardly people are accusive. If someone is elder and baboonish then they are xviii. Young people are xviii. If someone is elder and accusive then they are dampish. Ashton is not xviii.", "logic": "\nXviii(ainslie)\nDampish(ainslie)\nLoveless(ainslie)\nElder(ainslie)\nAccusive(ainslie)\nNiggardly(ainslie)\nDampish(ashton)\nLoveless(ashton)\nElder(ashton)\nBaboonish(ashton)\nAccusive(ashton)\nNiggardly(ashton)\nXviii(wendi)\nLoveless(wendi)\nElder(wendi)\nforall x (Baboonish(x) and Niggardly(x) -> Loveless(x))\nforall x (Elder(x) -> Niggardly(x))\nforall x (Loveless(x) and Niggardly(x) -> Accusive(x))\nforall x (Elder(x) and Baboonish(x) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Niggardly(x) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Elder(x) and Accusive(x) -> Dampish(x))\n\nnot Xviii(ashton)\n\nNiggardly(ashton) and forall x (Niggardly(x) -> Xviii(x)) -> therefore Xviii(ashton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Brea is sagittate. Brea is watered. Brea is domestic. Brea is agape. Brea is protrusile. Brea is nodular. Salmon is watered. Salmon is domestic. Salmon is agape. Salmon is practiced. Salmon is protrusile. Salmon is nodular. Bettye is sagittate. Bettye is domestic. Bettye is agape. Round, nodular people are domestic. If someone is agape then they are nodular. All domestic, nodular people are protrusile. If someone is agape and practiced then they are sagittate. Young people are sagittate. If someone is agape and protrusile then they are watered. Bettye is protrusile.", "logic": "\nSagittate(brea)\nWatered(brea)\nDomestic(brea)\nAgape(brea)\nProtrusile(brea)\nNodular(brea)\nWatered(salmon)\nDomestic(salmon)\nAgape(salmon)\nPracticed(salmon)\nProtrusile(salmon)\nNodular(salmon)\nSagittate(bettye)\nDomestic(bettye)\nAgape(bettye)\nforall x (Practiced(x) and Nodular(x) -> Domestic(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) -> Nodular(x))\nforall x (Domestic(x) and Nodular(x) -> Protrusile(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) and Practiced(x) -> Sagittate(x))\nforall x (Nodular(x) -> Sagittate(x))\nforall x (Agape(x) and Protrusile(x) -> Watered(x))\n\nProtrusile(bettye)\n\nAgape(bettye) and forall x (Agape(x) -> Nodular(x)) -> therefore Nodular(bettye) Domestic(bettye) and Nodular(bettye) and forall x (Domestic(x) and Nodular(x) -> Protrusile(x)) -> therefore Protrusile(bettye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Hezekiah is encysted. Hezekiah is bandaged. Hezekiah is outlaw. Hezekiah is motherlike. Hezekiah is weird. Hezekiah is ceric. Chelton is bandaged. Chelton is outlaw. Chelton is motherlike. Chelton is sapid. Chelton is weird. Chelton is ceric. Riane is encysted. Riane is outlaw. Riane is motherlike. Round, ceric people are outlaw. If someone is motherlike then they are ceric. All outlaw, ceric people are weird. If someone is motherlike and sapid then they are encysted. Young people are encysted. If someone is motherlike and weird then they are bandaged. Riane is not weird.", "logic": "\nEncysted(hezekiah)\nBandaged(hezekiah)\nOutlaw(hezekiah)\nMotherlike(hezekiah)\nWeird(hezekiah)\nCeric(hezekiah)\nBandaged(chelton)\nOutlaw(chelton)\nMotherlike(chelton)\nSapid(chelton)\nWeird(chelton)\nCeric(chelton)\nEncysted(riane)\nOutlaw(riane)\nMotherlike(riane)\nforall x (Sapid(x) and Ceric(x) -> Outlaw(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) -> Ceric(x))\nforall x (Outlaw(x) and Ceric(x) -> Weird(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and Sapid(x) -> Encysted(x))\nforall x (Ceric(x) -> Encysted(x))\nforall x (Motherlike(x) and Weird(x) -> Bandaged(x))\n\nnot Weird(riane)\n\nMotherlike(riane) and forall x (Motherlike(x) -> Ceric(x)) -> therefore Ceric(riane) Outlaw(riane) and Ceric(riane) and forall x (Outlaw(x) and Ceric(x) -> Weird(x)) -> therefore Weird(riane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Fairfax is hardbound. Fairfax is sickish. Fairfax is screaky. Fairfax is asat. Fairfax is unturned. Fairfax is bullnecked. Bliss is sickish. Bliss is screaky. Bliss is asat. Bliss is bilobed. Bliss is unturned. Bliss is bullnecked. Sidonnie is hardbound. Sidonnie is screaky. Sidonnie is asat. Round, bullnecked people are screaky. If someone is asat then they are bullnecked. All screaky, bullnecked people are unturned. If someone is asat and bilobed then they are hardbound. Young people are hardbound. If someone is asat and unturned then they are sickish. Sidonnie is sickish.", "logic": "\nHardbound(fairfax)\nSickish(fairfax)\nScreaky(fairfax)\nAsat(fairfax)\nUnturned(fairfax)\nBullnecked(fairfax)\nSickish(bliss)\nScreaky(bliss)\nAsat(bliss)\nBilobed(bliss)\nUnturned(bliss)\nBullnecked(bliss)\nHardbound(sidonnie)\nScreaky(sidonnie)\nAsat(sidonnie)\nforall x (Bilobed(x) and Bullnecked(x) -> Screaky(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) -> Bullnecked(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) and Bullnecked(x) -> Unturned(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) and Bilobed(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) -> Hardbound(x))\nforall x (Asat(x) and Unturned(x) -> Sickish(x))\n\nSickish(sidonnie)\n\nAsat(sidonnie) and forall x (Asat(x) -> Bullnecked(x)) -> therefore Bullnecked(sidonnie) Screaky(sidonnie) and Bullnecked(sidonnie) and forall x (Screaky(x) and Bullnecked(x) -> Unturned(x)) -> therefore Unturned(sidonnie) Asat(sidonnie) and Unturned(sidonnie) and forall x (Asat(x) and Unturned(x) -> Sickish(x)) -> therefore Sickish(sidonnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Hiralal is consecrate. Hiralal is deceased. Hiralal is hydrated. Hiralal is yellow. Hiralal is upscale. Hiralal is exulting. Sallee is deceased. Sallee is hydrated. Sallee is yellow. Sallee is leaved. Sallee is upscale. Sallee is exulting. Ferguson is consecrate. Ferguson is hydrated. Ferguson is yellow. Round, exulting people are hydrated. If someone is yellow then they are exulting. All hydrated, exulting people are upscale. If someone is yellow and leaved then they are consecrate. Young people are consecrate. If someone is yellow and upscale then they are deceased. Ferguson is not deceased.", "logic": "\nConsecrate(hiralal)\nDeceased(hiralal)\nHydrated(hiralal)\nYellow(hiralal)\nUpscale(hiralal)\nExulting(hiralal)\nDeceased(sallee)\nHydrated(sallee)\nYellow(sallee)\nLeaved(sallee)\nUpscale(sallee)\nExulting(sallee)\nConsecrate(ferguson)\nHydrated(ferguson)\nYellow(ferguson)\nforall x (Leaved(x) and Exulting(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) -> Exulting(x))\nforall x (Hydrated(x) and Exulting(x) -> Upscale(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) and Leaved(x) -> Consecrate(x))\nforall x (Exulting(x) -> Consecrate(x))\nforall x (Yellow(x) and Upscale(x) -> Deceased(x))\n\nnot Deceased(ferguson)\n\nYellow(ferguson) and forall x (Yellow(x) -> Exulting(x)) -> therefore Exulting(ferguson) Hydrated(ferguson) and Exulting(ferguson) and forall x (Hydrated(x) and Exulting(x) -> Upscale(x)) -> therefore Upscale(ferguson) Yellow(ferguson) and Upscale(ferguson) and forall x (Yellow(x) and Upscale(x) -> Deceased(x)) -> therefore Deceased(ferguson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Maurie is hexagonal. Maurie is ungrasped. Maurie is poised. Maurie is matey. Maurie is unblessed. Maurie is saxicoline. Ashleigh is ungrasped. Ashleigh is poised. Ashleigh is matey. Ashleigh is probatory. Ashleigh is unblessed. Ashleigh is saxicoline. Katrinka is hexagonal. Katrinka is poised. Katrinka is matey. Round, saxicoline people are poised. If someone is matey then they are saxicoline. All poised, saxicoline people are unblessed. If someone is matey and probatory then they are hexagonal. Young people are hexagonal. If someone is matey and unblessed then they are ungrasped. Katrinka is not probatory.", "logic": "\nHexagonal(maurie)\nUngrasped(maurie)\nPoised(maurie)\nMatey(maurie)\nUnblessed(maurie)\nSaxicoline(maurie)\nUngrasped(ashleigh)\nPoised(ashleigh)\nMatey(ashleigh)\nProbatory(ashleigh)\nUnblessed(ashleigh)\nSaxicoline(ashleigh)\nHexagonal(katrinka)\nPoised(katrinka)\nMatey(katrinka)\nforall x (Probatory(x) and Saxicoline(x) -> Poised(x))\nforall x (Matey(x) -> Saxicoline(x))\nforall x (Poised(x) and Saxicoline(x) -> Unblessed(x))\nforall x (Matey(x) and Probatory(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Saxicoline(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Matey(x) and Unblessed(x) -> Ungrasped(x))\n\nnot Probatory(katrinka)\n\nnot Probatory(katrinka) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "Susanetta is spiky. Susanetta is nutlike. Susanetta is expedient. Susanetta is meridional. Susanetta is brunette. Susanetta is jolly. Yehudi is nutlike. Yehudi is expedient. Yehudi is meridional. Yehudi is duplicate. Yehudi is brunette. Yehudi is jolly. Orazio is spiky. Orazio is expedient. Orazio is meridional. Round, jolly people are expedient. If someone is meridional then they are jolly. All expedient, jolly people are brunette. If someone is meridional and duplicate then they are spiky. Young people are spiky. If someone is meridional and brunette then they are nutlike. Susanetta is duplicate.", "logic": "\nSpiky(susanetta)\nNutlike(susanetta)\nExpedient(susanetta)\nMeridional(susanetta)\nBrunette(susanetta)\nJolly(susanetta)\nNutlike(yehudi)\nExpedient(yehudi)\nMeridional(yehudi)\nDuplicate(yehudi)\nBrunette(yehudi)\nJolly(yehudi)\nSpiky(orazio)\nExpedient(orazio)\nMeridional(orazio)\nforall x (Duplicate(x) and Jolly(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Meridional(x) -> Jolly(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) and Jolly(x) -> Brunette(x))\nforall x (Meridional(x) and Duplicate(x) -> Spiky(x))\nforall x (Jolly(x) -> Spiky(x))\nforall x (Meridional(x) and Brunette(x) -> Nutlike(x))\n\nDuplicate(susanetta)\n\nDuplicate(susanetta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1128"} {"premises": "The esme uniformize the ace. The esme vegetate the ace. The esme is bathyal. The esme is sightly. The esme beard the ace. The ace uniformize the esme. The ace beard the esme. If someone is authorial then they visit the esme. If someone is unshielded and they visit the esme then they visit the ace. If someone is bathyal and they eat the esme then they chase the esme. If someone beard the esme and the esme uniformize the ace then the ace vegetate the esme. If someone vegetate the esme then they are unshielded. If someone is unshielded and they visit the ace then they chase the esme. The ace uniformize the esme.", "logic": "\nUniformize(esme, ace)\nVegetate(esme, ace)\nBathyal(esme)\nSightly(esme)\nBeard(esme, ace)\nUniformize(ace, esme)\nBeard(ace, esme)\nforall x (Authorial(x) -> Beard(x, esme))\nforall x (Unshielded(x) and Beard(x, esme) -> Beard(x, ace))\nforall x (Bathyal(x) and Vegetate(x, esme) -> Uniformize(x, esme))\nforall x (Beard(x, esme) and Uniformize(esme, ace) -> Vegetate(ace, esme))\nforall x (Vegetate(x, esme) -> Unshielded(x))\nforall x (Unshielded(x) and Beard(x, ace) -> Uniformize(x, esme))\n\nUniformize(ace, esme)\n\ntherefore Uniformize(ace, esme)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The suzetta harbor the mohan. The suzetta level the mohan. The suzetta is cuneiform. The suzetta is slatternly. The suzetta enamel the mohan. The mohan harbor the suzetta. The mohan enamel the suzetta. If someone is abeyant then they visit the suzetta. If someone is unthinking and they visit the suzetta then they visit the mohan. If someone is cuneiform and they eat the suzetta then they chase the suzetta. If someone enamel the suzetta and the suzetta harbor the mohan then the mohan level the suzetta. If someone level the suzetta then they are unthinking. If someone is unthinking and they visit the mohan then they chase the suzetta. The mohan does not chase the suzetta.", "logic": "\nHarbor(suzetta, mohan)\nLevel(suzetta, mohan)\nCuneiform(suzetta)\nSlatternly(suzetta)\nEnamel(suzetta, mohan)\nHarbor(mohan, suzetta)\nEnamel(mohan, suzetta)\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Enamel(x, suzetta))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) and Enamel(x, suzetta) -> Enamel(x, mohan))\nforall x (Cuneiform(x) and Level(x, suzetta) -> Harbor(x, suzetta))\nforall x (Enamel(x, suzetta) and Harbor(suzetta, mohan) -> Level(mohan, suzetta))\nforall x (Level(x, suzetta) -> Unthinking(x))\nforall x (Unthinking(x) and Enamel(x, mohan) -> Harbor(x, suzetta))\n\nnot Harbor(mohan, suzetta)\n\ntherefore Harbor(mohan, suzetta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The carlton enthrone the jackson. The carlton foreclose the jackson. The carlton is saturnine. The carlton is handless. The carlton catalog the jackson. The jackson enthrone the carlton. The jackson catalog the carlton. If someone is annulated then they visit the carlton. If someone is ruling and they visit the carlton then they visit the jackson. If someone is saturnine and they eat the carlton then they chase the carlton. If someone catalog the carlton and the carlton enthrone the jackson then the jackson foreclose the carlton. If someone foreclose the carlton then they are ruling. If someone is ruling and they visit the jackson then they chase the carlton. The jackson foreclose the carlton.", "logic": "\nEnthrone(carlton, jackson)\nForeclose(carlton, jackson)\nSaturnine(carlton)\nHandless(carlton)\nCatalog(carlton, jackson)\nEnthrone(jackson, carlton)\nCatalog(jackson, carlton)\nforall x (Annulated(x) -> Catalog(x, carlton))\nforall x (Ruling(x) and Catalog(x, carlton) -> Catalog(x, jackson))\nforall x (Saturnine(x) and Foreclose(x, carlton) -> Enthrone(x, carlton))\nforall x (Catalog(x, carlton) and Enthrone(carlton, jackson) -> Foreclose(jackson, carlton))\nforall x (Foreclose(x, carlton) -> Ruling(x))\nforall x (Ruling(x) and Catalog(x, jackson) -> Enthrone(x, carlton))\n\nForeclose(jackson, carlton)\n\nCatalog(jackson, carlton) and Enthrone(carlton, jackson) and forall x (Catalog(x, carlton) and Enthrone(carlton, jackson) -> Foreclose(jackson, carlton)) -> therefore Foreclose(jackson, carlton)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The thekla gift the alden. The thekla bespangle the alden. The thekla is shiftless. The thekla is filmable. The thekla flap the alden. The alden gift the thekla. The alden flap the thekla. If someone is inherited then they visit the thekla. If someone is acerose and they visit the thekla then they visit the alden. If someone is shiftless and they eat the thekla then they chase the thekla. If someone flap the thekla and the thekla gift the alden then the alden bespangle the thekla. If someone bespangle the thekla then they are acerose. If someone is acerose and they visit the alden then they chase the thekla. The alden does not eat the thekla.", "logic": "\nGift(thekla, alden)\nBespangle(thekla, alden)\nShiftless(thekla)\nFilmable(thekla)\nFlap(thekla, alden)\nGift(alden, thekla)\nFlap(alden, thekla)\nforall x (Inherited(x) -> Flap(x, thekla))\nforall x (Acerose(x) and Flap(x, thekla) -> Flap(x, alden))\nforall x (Shiftless(x) and Bespangle(x, thekla) -> Gift(x, thekla))\nforall x (Flap(x, thekla) and Gift(thekla, alden) -> Bespangle(alden, thekla))\nforall x (Bespangle(x, thekla) -> Acerose(x))\nforall x (Acerose(x) and Flap(x, alden) -> Gift(x, thekla))\n\nnot Bespangle(alden, thekla)\n\nFlap(alden, thekla) and Gift(thekla, alden) and forall x (Flap(x, thekla) and Gift(thekla, alden) -> Bespangle(alden, thekla)) -> therefore Bespangle(alden, thekla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The bjorne luxuriate the craig. The bjorne parachute the craig. The bjorne is eurasiatic. The bjorne is oblique. The bjorne destine the craig. The craig luxuriate the bjorne. The craig destine the bjorne. If someone is hebrew then they visit the bjorne. If someone is scenic and they visit the bjorne then they visit the craig. If someone is eurasiatic and they eat the bjorne then they chase the bjorne. If someone destine the bjorne and the bjorne luxuriate the craig then the craig parachute the bjorne. If someone parachute the bjorne then they are scenic. If someone is scenic and they visit the craig then they chase the bjorne. The craig is scenic.", "logic": "\nLuxuriate(bjorne, craig)\nParachute(bjorne, craig)\nEurasiatic(bjorne)\nOblique(bjorne)\nDestine(bjorne, craig)\nLuxuriate(craig, bjorne)\nDestine(craig, bjorne)\nforall x (Hebrew(x) -> Destine(x, bjorne))\nforall x (Scenic(x) and Destine(x, bjorne) -> Destine(x, craig))\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) and Parachute(x, bjorne) -> Luxuriate(x, bjorne))\nforall x (Destine(x, bjorne) and Luxuriate(bjorne, craig) -> Parachute(craig, bjorne))\nforall x (Parachute(x, bjorne) -> Scenic(x))\nforall x (Scenic(x) and Destine(x, craig) -> Luxuriate(x, bjorne))\n\nScenic(craig)\n\nDestine(craig, bjorne) and Luxuriate(bjorne, craig) and forall x (Destine(x, bjorne) and Luxuriate(bjorne, craig) -> Parachute(craig, bjorne)) -> therefore Parachute(craig, bjorne) Parachute(craig, bjorne) and forall x (Parachute(x, bjorne) -> Scenic(x)) -> therefore Scenic(craig)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The murdoch discolor the demetra. The murdoch scrutinise the demetra. The murdoch is timbered. The murdoch is deceptive. The murdoch junketeer the demetra. The demetra discolor the murdoch. The demetra junketeer the murdoch. If someone is tuscan then they visit the murdoch. If someone is fuzzed and they visit the murdoch then they visit the demetra. If someone is timbered and they eat the murdoch then they chase the murdoch. If someone junketeer the murdoch and the murdoch discolor the demetra then the demetra scrutinise the murdoch. If someone scrutinise the murdoch then they are fuzzed. If someone is fuzzed and they visit the demetra then they chase the murdoch. The demetra is not fuzzed.", "logic": "\nDiscolor(murdoch, demetra)\nScrutinise(murdoch, demetra)\nTimbered(murdoch)\nDeceptive(murdoch)\nJunketeer(murdoch, demetra)\nDiscolor(demetra, murdoch)\nJunketeer(demetra, murdoch)\nforall x (Tuscan(x) -> Junketeer(x, murdoch))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Junketeer(x, murdoch) -> Junketeer(x, demetra))\nforall x (Timbered(x) and Scrutinise(x, murdoch) -> Discolor(x, murdoch))\nforall x (Junketeer(x, murdoch) and Discolor(murdoch, demetra) -> Scrutinise(demetra, murdoch))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, murdoch) -> Fuzzed(x))\nforall x (Fuzzed(x) and Junketeer(x, demetra) -> Discolor(x, murdoch))\n\nnot Fuzzed(demetra)\n\nJunketeer(demetra, murdoch) and Discolor(murdoch, demetra) and forall x (Junketeer(x, murdoch) and Discolor(murdoch, demetra) -> Scrutinise(demetra, murdoch)) -> therefore Scrutinise(demetra, murdoch) Scrutinise(demetra, murdoch) and forall x (Scrutinise(x, murdoch) -> Fuzzed(x)) -> therefore Fuzzed(demetra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The bryon unhinge the lefty. The bryon totalise the lefty. The bryon is nonhairy. The bryon is roaring. The bryon finagle the lefty. The lefty unhinge the bryon. The lefty finagle the bryon. If someone is wailful then they visit the bryon. If someone is obtuse and they visit the bryon then they visit the lefty. If someone is nonhairy and they eat the bryon then they chase the bryon. If someone finagle the bryon and the bryon unhinge the lefty then the lefty totalise the bryon. If someone totalise the bryon then they are obtuse. If someone is obtuse and they visit the lefty then they chase the bryon. The lefty finagle the lefty.", "logic": "\nUnhinge(bryon, lefty)\nTotalise(bryon, lefty)\nNonhairy(bryon)\nRoaring(bryon)\nFinagle(bryon, lefty)\nUnhinge(lefty, bryon)\nFinagle(lefty, bryon)\nforall x (Wailful(x) -> Finagle(x, bryon))\nforall x (Obtuse(x) and Finagle(x, bryon) -> Finagle(x, lefty))\nforall x (Nonhairy(x) and Totalise(x, bryon) -> Unhinge(x, bryon))\nforall x (Finagle(x, bryon) and Unhinge(bryon, lefty) -> Totalise(lefty, bryon))\nforall x (Totalise(x, bryon) -> Obtuse(x))\nforall x (Obtuse(x) and Finagle(x, lefty) -> Unhinge(x, bryon))\n\nFinagle(lefty, lefty)\n\nFinagle(lefty, bryon) and Unhinge(bryon, lefty) and forall x (Finagle(x, bryon) and Unhinge(bryon, lefty) -> Totalise(lefty, bryon)) -> therefore Totalise(lefty, bryon) Totalise(lefty, bryon) and forall x (Totalise(x, bryon) -> Obtuse(x)) -> therefore Obtuse(lefty) Obtuse(lefty) and Finagle(lefty, bryon) and forall x (Obtuse(x) and Finagle(x, bryon) -> Finagle(x, lefty)) -> therefore Finagle(lefty, lefty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The lainey turf the jeremy. The lainey boondoggle the jeremy. The lainey is lyrical. The lainey is oncologic. The lainey destain the jeremy. The jeremy turf the lainey. The jeremy destain the lainey. If someone is falciform then they visit the lainey. If someone is mutual and they visit the lainey then they visit the jeremy. If someone is lyrical and they eat the lainey then they chase the lainey. If someone destain the lainey and the lainey turf the jeremy then the jeremy boondoggle the lainey. If someone boondoggle the lainey then they are mutual. If someone is mutual and they visit the jeremy then they chase the lainey. The jeremy does not visit the jeremy.", "logic": "\nTurf(lainey, jeremy)\nBoondoggle(lainey, jeremy)\nLyrical(lainey)\nOncologic(lainey)\nDestain(lainey, jeremy)\nTurf(jeremy, lainey)\nDestain(jeremy, lainey)\nforall x (Falciform(x) -> Destain(x, lainey))\nforall x (Mutual(x) and Destain(x, lainey) -> Destain(x, jeremy))\nforall x (Lyrical(x) and Boondoggle(x, lainey) -> Turf(x, lainey))\nforall x (Destain(x, lainey) and Turf(lainey, jeremy) -> Boondoggle(jeremy, lainey))\nforall x (Boondoggle(x, lainey) -> Mutual(x))\nforall x (Mutual(x) and Destain(x, jeremy) -> Turf(x, lainey))\n\nnot Destain(jeremy, jeremy)\n\nDestain(jeremy, lainey) and Turf(lainey, jeremy) and forall x (Destain(x, lainey) and Turf(lainey, jeremy) -> Boondoggle(jeremy, lainey)) -> therefore Boondoggle(jeremy, lainey) Boondoggle(jeremy, lainey) and forall x (Boondoggle(x, lainey) -> Mutual(x)) -> therefore Mutual(jeremy) Mutual(jeremy) and Destain(jeremy, lainey) and forall x (Mutual(x) and Destain(x, lainey) -> Destain(x, jeremy)) -> therefore Destain(jeremy, jeremy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The kassia titillate the sileas. The kassia flounder the sileas. The kassia is cherubic. The kassia is theocratic. The kassia meow the sileas. The sileas titillate the kassia. The sileas meow the kassia. If someone is sulky then they visit the kassia. If someone is scurfy and they visit the kassia then they visit the sileas. If someone is cherubic and they eat the kassia then they chase the kassia. If someone meow the kassia and the kassia titillate the sileas then the sileas flounder the kassia. If someone flounder the kassia then they are scurfy. If someone is scurfy and they visit the sileas then they chase the kassia. The kassia does not visit the kassia.", "logic": "\nTitillate(kassia, sileas)\nFlounder(kassia, sileas)\nCherubic(kassia)\nTheocratic(kassia)\nMeow(kassia, sileas)\nTitillate(sileas, kassia)\nMeow(sileas, kassia)\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Meow(x, kassia))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) and Meow(x, kassia) -> Meow(x, sileas))\nforall x (Cherubic(x) and Flounder(x, kassia) -> Titillate(x, kassia))\nforall x (Meow(x, kassia) and Titillate(kassia, sileas) -> Flounder(sileas, kassia))\nforall x (Flounder(x, kassia) -> Scurfy(x))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) and Meow(x, sileas) -> Titillate(x, kassia))\n\nnot Meow(kassia, kassia)\n\nforall x (Sulky(x) -> Meow(x, kassia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The roosevelt localise the shellie. The roosevelt straighten the shellie. The roosevelt is stemless. The roosevelt is congenital. The roosevelt pale the shellie. The shellie localise the roosevelt. The shellie pale the roosevelt. If someone is theban then they visit the roosevelt. If someone is ruthless and they visit the roosevelt then they visit the shellie. If someone is stemless and they eat the roosevelt then they chase the roosevelt. If someone pale the roosevelt and the roosevelt localise the shellie then the shellie straighten the roosevelt. If someone straighten the roosevelt then they are ruthless. If someone is ruthless and they visit the shellie then they chase the roosevelt. The roosevelt is ruthless.", "logic": "\nLocalise(roosevelt, shellie)\nStraighten(roosevelt, shellie)\nStemless(roosevelt)\nCongenital(roosevelt)\nPale(roosevelt, shellie)\nLocalise(shellie, roosevelt)\nPale(shellie, roosevelt)\nforall x (Theban(x) -> Pale(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Ruthless(x) and Pale(x, roosevelt) -> Pale(x, shellie))\nforall x (Stemless(x) and Straighten(x, roosevelt) -> Localise(x, roosevelt))\nforall x (Pale(x, roosevelt) and Localise(roosevelt, shellie) -> Straighten(shellie, roosevelt))\nforall x (Straighten(x, roosevelt) -> Ruthless(x))\nforall x (Ruthless(x) and Pale(x, shellie) -> Localise(x, roosevelt))\n\nRuthless(roosevelt)\n\nforall x (Straighten(x, roosevelt) -> Ruthless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The katheryn defecate the florina. The katheryn occupy the florina. The katheryn is jovial. The katheryn is unpleasing. The katheryn bellylaugh the florina. The florina defecate the katheryn. The florina bellylaugh the katheryn. If someone is willowy then they visit the katheryn. If someone is conceited and they visit the katheryn then they visit the florina. If someone is jovial and they eat the katheryn then they chase the katheryn. If someone bellylaugh the katheryn and the katheryn defecate the florina then the florina occupy the katheryn. If someone occupy the katheryn then they are conceited. If someone is conceited and they visit the florina then they chase the katheryn. The katheryn does not chase the katheryn.", "logic": "\nDefecate(katheryn, florina)\nOccupy(katheryn, florina)\nJovial(katheryn)\nUnpleasing(katheryn)\nBellylaugh(katheryn, florina)\nDefecate(florina, katheryn)\nBellylaugh(florina, katheryn)\nforall x (Willowy(x) -> Bellylaugh(x, katheryn))\nforall x (Conceited(x) and Bellylaugh(x, katheryn) -> Bellylaugh(x, florina))\nforall x (Jovial(x) and Occupy(x, katheryn) -> Defecate(x, katheryn))\nforall x (Bellylaugh(x, katheryn) and Defecate(katheryn, florina) -> Occupy(florina, katheryn))\nforall x (Occupy(x, katheryn) -> Conceited(x))\nforall x (Conceited(x) and Bellylaugh(x, florina) -> Defecate(x, katheryn))\n\nnot Defecate(katheryn, katheryn)\n\nforall x (Conceited(x) and Bellylaugh(x, florina) -> Defecate(x, katheryn)) <- forall x (Occupy(x, katheryn) -> Conceited(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The izaak slide the merrel. The izaak steamer the merrel. The izaak is wheaten. The izaak is stemmatic. The izaak constrain the merrel. The merrel slide the izaak. The merrel constrain the izaak. If someone is grown then they visit the izaak. If someone is electric and they visit the izaak then they visit the merrel. If someone is wheaten and they eat the izaak then they chase the izaak. If someone constrain the izaak and the izaak slide the merrel then the merrel steamer the izaak. If someone steamer the izaak then they are electric. If someone is electric and they visit the merrel then they chase the izaak. The merrel is big.", "logic": "\nSlide(izaak, merrel)\nSteamer(izaak, merrel)\nWheaten(izaak)\nStemmatic(izaak)\nConstrain(izaak, merrel)\nSlide(merrel, izaak)\nConstrain(merrel, izaak)\nforall x (Grown(x) -> Constrain(x, izaak))\nforall x (Electric(x) and Constrain(x, izaak) -> Constrain(x, merrel))\nforall x (Wheaten(x) and Steamer(x, izaak) -> Slide(x, izaak))\nforall x (Constrain(x, izaak) and Slide(izaak, merrel) -> Steamer(merrel, izaak))\nforall x (Steamer(x, izaak) -> Electric(x))\nforall x (Electric(x) and Constrain(x, merrel) -> Slide(x, izaak))\n\nBig(merrel)\n\nBig(merrel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The pennie chalk the eustacia. The pennie overwrite the eustacia. The pennie is fisheye. The pennie is flashy. The pennie coil the eustacia. The eustacia chalk the pennie. The eustacia coil the pennie. If someone is secondary then they visit the pennie. If someone is atonal and they visit the pennie then they visit the eustacia. If someone is fisheye and they eat the pennie then they chase the pennie. If someone coil the pennie and the pennie chalk the eustacia then the eustacia overwrite the pennie. If someone overwrite the pennie then they are atonal. If someone is atonal and they visit the eustacia then they chase the pennie. The eustacia does not eat the eustacia.", "logic": "\nChalk(pennie, eustacia)\nOverwrite(pennie, eustacia)\nFisheye(pennie)\nFlashy(pennie)\nCoil(pennie, eustacia)\nChalk(eustacia, pennie)\nCoil(eustacia, pennie)\nforall x (Secondary(x) -> Coil(x, pennie))\nforall x (Atonal(x) and Coil(x, pennie) -> Coil(x, eustacia))\nforall x (Fisheye(x) and Overwrite(x, pennie) -> Chalk(x, pennie))\nforall x (Coil(x, pennie) and Chalk(pennie, eustacia) -> Overwrite(eustacia, pennie))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, pennie) -> Atonal(x))\nforall x (Atonal(x) and Coil(x, eustacia) -> Chalk(x, pennie))\n\nnot Overwrite(eustacia, eustacia)\n\nnot Overwrite(eustacia, eustacia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The hendrick embrown the samuele. The hendrick frizz the samuele. The hendrick is autoicous. The hendrick is coptic. The hendrick peal the samuele. The samuele embrown the hendrick. The samuele peal the hendrick. If someone is knavish then they visit the hendrick. If someone is reductive and they visit the hendrick then they visit the samuele. If someone is autoicous and they eat the hendrick then they chase the hendrick. If someone peal the hendrick and the hendrick embrown the samuele then the samuele frizz the hendrick. If someone frizz the hendrick then they are reductive. If someone is reductive and they visit the samuele then they chase the hendrick. The samuele is autoicous.", "logic": "\nEmbrown(hendrick, samuele)\nFrizz(hendrick, samuele)\nAutoicous(hendrick)\nCoptic(hendrick)\nPeal(hendrick, samuele)\nEmbrown(samuele, hendrick)\nPeal(samuele, hendrick)\nforall x (Knavish(x) -> Peal(x, hendrick))\nforall x (Reductive(x) and Peal(x, hendrick) -> Peal(x, samuele))\nforall x (Autoicous(x) and Frizz(x, hendrick) -> Embrown(x, hendrick))\nforall x (Peal(x, hendrick) and Embrown(hendrick, samuele) -> Frizz(samuele, hendrick))\nforall x (Frizz(x, hendrick) -> Reductive(x))\nforall x (Reductive(x) and Peal(x, samuele) -> Embrown(x, hendrick))\n\nAutoicous(samuele)\n\nAutoicous(samuele) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The dunstan nosedive the ranna. The dunstan tell the ranna. The dunstan is unary. The dunstan is mycenaean. The dunstan wench the ranna. The ranna nosedive the dunstan. The ranna wench the dunstan. If someone is bolshevik then they visit the dunstan. If someone is humanistic and they visit the dunstan then they visit the ranna. If someone is unary and they eat the dunstan then they chase the dunstan. If someone wench the dunstan and the dunstan nosedive the ranna then the ranna tell the dunstan. If someone tell the dunstan then they are humanistic. If someone is humanistic and they visit the ranna then they chase the dunstan. The ranna is not mycenaean.", "logic": "\nNosedive(dunstan, ranna)\nTell(dunstan, ranna)\nUnary(dunstan)\nMycenaean(dunstan)\nWench(dunstan, ranna)\nNosedive(ranna, dunstan)\nWench(ranna, dunstan)\nforall x (Bolshevik(x) -> Wench(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Humanistic(x) and Wench(x, dunstan) -> Wench(x, ranna))\nforall x (Unary(x) and Tell(x, dunstan) -> Nosedive(x, dunstan))\nforall x (Wench(x, dunstan) and Nosedive(dunstan, ranna) -> Tell(ranna, dunstan))\nforall x (Tell(x, dunstan) -> Humanistic(x))\nforall x (Humanistic(x) and Wench(x, ranna) -> Nosedive(x, dunstan))\n\nnot Mycenaean(ranna)\n\nnot Mycenaean(ranna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "The rozelle jive the rosamond. The rozelle truncate the rosamond. The rozelle is promotive. The rozelle is untimbered. The rozelle autoclave the rosamond. The rosamond jive the rozelle. The rosamond autoclave the rozelle. If someone is lenient then they visit the rozelle. If someone is encased and they visit the rozelle then they visit the rosamond. If someone is promotive and they eat the rozelle then they chase the rozelle. If someone autoclave the rozelle and the rozelle jive the rosamond then the rosamond truncate the rozelle. If someone truncate the rozelle then they are encased. If someone is encased and they visit the rosamond then they chase the rozelle. The rosamond is lenient.", "logic": "\nJive(rozelle, rosamond)\nTruncate(rozelle, rosamond)\nPromotive(rozelle)\nUntimbered(rozelle)\nAutoclave(rozelle, rosamond)\nJive(rosamond, rozelle)\nAutoclave(rosamond, rozelle)\nforall x (Lenient(x) -> Autoclave(x, rozelle))\nforall x (Encased(x) and Autoclave(x, rozelle) -> Autoclave(x, rosamond))\nforall x (Promotive(x) and Truncate(x, rozelle) -> Jive(x, rozelle))\nforall x (Autoclave(x, rozelle) and Jive(rozelle, rosamond) -> Truncate(rosamond, rozelle))\nforall x (Truncate(x, rozelle) -> Encased(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) and Autoclave(x, rosamond) -> Jive(x, rozelle))\n\nLenient(rosamond)\n\nLenient(rosamond) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1627"} {"premises": "Jule is darned. Jule is light. Jule is trousered. Douglis is advanced. Carlee is not darned. Carlee is donatist. Becky is acquired. All donatist things are acquired. If something is donatist and not trousered then it is not light. Douglis is advanced.", "logic": "\nDarned(jule)\nLight(jule)\nTrousered(jule)\nAdvanced(douglis)\nnot Darned(carlee)\nDonatist(carlee)\nAcquired(becky)\nforall x (Donatist(x) -> Acquired(x))\nforall x (Donatist(x) and not Trousered(x) -> not Light(x))\n\nAdvanced(douglis)\n\ntherefore Advanced(douglis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-510"} {"premises": "Lisabeth is adynamic. Lisabeth is fivefold. Lisabeth is inclement. Sibilla is zonary. Jordon is not adynamic. Jordon is unmixed. Pandora is mismated. All unmixed things are mismated. If something is unmixed and not inclement then it is not fivefold. Pandora is not mismated.", "logic": "\nAdynamic(lisabeth)\nFivefold(lisabeth)\nInclement(lisabeth)\nZonary(sibilla)\nnot Adynamic(jordon)\nUnmixed(jordon)\nMismated(pandora)\nforall x (Unmixed(x) -> Mismated(x))\nforall x (Unmixed(x) and not Inclement(x) -> not Fivefold(x))\n\nnot Mismated(pandora)\n\ntherefore Mismated(pandora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-510"} {"premises": "Aime is ersatz. Aime is indebted. Aime is unflawed. Querida is protruding. Jude is not ersatz. Jude is unratable. Engracia is voluminous. All unratable things are voluminous. If something is unratable and not unflawed then it is not indebted. Querida is not voluminous.", "logic": "\nErsatz(aime)\nIndebted(aime)\nUnflawed(aime)\nProtruding(querida)\nnot Ersatz(jude)\nUnratable(jude)\nVoluminous(engracia)\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Voluminous(x))\nforall x (Unratable(x) and not Unflawed(x) -> not Indebted(x))\n\nnot Voluminous(querida)\n\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Voluminous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-510"} {"premises": "Catrina is praiseful. Catrina is earthbound. Catrina is charming. Zulema is bregmatic. Benjamen is not praiseful. Benjamen is fleshy. Gera is humoral. All fleshy things are humoral. If something is fleshy and not charming then it is not earthbound. Zulema is praiseful.", "logic": "\nPraiseful(catrina)\nEarthbound(catrina)\nCharming(catrina)\nBregmatic(zulema)\nnot Praiseful(benjamen)\nFleshy(benjamen)\nHumoral(gera)\nforall x (Fleshy(x) -> Humoral(x))\nforall x (Fleshy(x) and not Charming(x) -> not Earthbound(x))\n\nPraiseful(zulema)\n\nPraiseful(zulema) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-510"} {"premises": "The terrill is fulgid. The sena pipe the terrill. If something is ectodermal then it pipe the terrill. If something is fledgeling then it avert the terrill. The sena pipe the terrill.", "logic": "\nFulgid(terrill)\nPipe(sena, terrill)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) -> Pipe(x, terrill))\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) -> Avert(x, terrill))\n\nPipe(sena, terrill)\n\ntherefore Pipe(sena, terrill)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2354"} {"premises": "The georg is peltate. The shay monger the georg. If something is incarnate then it monger the georg. If something is soignee then it shin the georg. The georg is not peltate.", "logic": "\nPeltate(georg)\nMonger(shay, georg)\nforall x (Incarnate(x) -> Monger(x, georg))\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Shin(x, georg))\n\nnot Peltate(georg)\n\ntherefore Peltate(georg)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2354"} {"premises": "The andres is elflike. The daniella thank the andres. If something is ashen then it thank the andres. If something is delimited then it reprieve the andres. The andres does not eat the andres.", "logic": "\nElflike(andres)\nThank(daniella, andres)\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> Thank(x, andres))\nforall x (Delimited(x) -> Reprieve(x, andres))\n\nnot Thank(andres, andres)\n\nforall x (Ashen(x) -> Thank(x, andres)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2354"} {"premises": "The heidie is imbecilic. The shoshanna antiquate the heidie. If something is confutable then it antiquate the heidie. If something is sufi then it conclude the heidie. The shoshanna antiquate the shoshanna.", "logic": "\nImbecilic(heidie)\nAntiquate(shoshanna, heidie)\nforall x (Confutable(x) -> Antiquate(x, heidie))\nforall x (Sufi(x) -> Conclude(x, heidie))\n\nAntiquate(shoshanna, shoshanna)\n\nAntiquate(shoshanna, shoshanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-2354"} {"premises": "The hamnet wattle the kevin. The kevin dismount the hamnet. If someone wattle the hamnet and they are kechuan then the hamnet is kechuan. If the hamnet dismount the kevin then the kevin is hundred. If someone dismount the hamnet then the hamnet is kechuan. If someone dismount the hamnet and they visit the hamnet then they eat the hamnet. If someone is bothered then they are hundred. If someone dismount the hamnet and the hamnet is kechuan then the hamnet frizz the kevin. The hamnet wattle the kevin.", "logic": "\nWattle(hamnet, kevin)\nDismount(kevin, hamnet)\nforall x (Wattle(x, hamnet) and Kechuan(x) -> Kechuan(hamnet))\nDismount(hamnet, kevin) -> Hundred(kevin)\nforall x (Dismount(x, hamnet) -> Kechuan(hamnet))\nforall x (Dismount(x, hamnet) and Wattle(x, hamnet) -> Frizz(x, hamnet))\nforall x (Bothered(x) -> Hundred(x))\nforall x (Dismount(x, hamnet) and Kechuan(hamnet) -> Frizz(hamnet, kevin))\n\nWattle(hamnet, kevin)\n\ntherefore Wattle(hamnet, kevin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "The lizbeth feign the lorene. The lorene upholster the lizbeth. If someone feign the lizbeth and they are iraqi then the lizbeth is iraqi. If the lizbeth upholster the lorene then the lorene is cypriote. If someone upholster the lizbeth then the lizbeth is iraqi. If someone upholster the lizbeth and they visit the lizbeth then they eat the lizbeth. If someone is desirable then they are cypriote. If someone upholster the lizbeth and the lizbeth is iraqi then the lizbeth miter the lorene. The lizbeth does not visit the lorene.", "logic": "\nFeign(lizbeth, lorene)\nUpholster(lorene, lizbeth)\nforall x (Feign(x, lizbeth) and Iraqi(x) -> Iraqi(lizbeth))\nUpholster(lizbeth, lorene) -> Cypriote(lorene)\nforall x (Upholster(x, lizbeth) -> Iraqi(lizbeth))\nforall x (Upholster(x, lizbeth) and Feign(x, lizbeth) -> Miter(x, lizbeth))\nforall x (Desirable(x) -> Cypriote(x))\nforall x (Upholster(x, lizbeth) and Iraqi(lizbeth) -> Miter(lizbeth, lorene))\n\nnot Feign(lizbeth, lorene)\n\ntherefore Feign(lizbeth, lorene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "The tabby miniate the geri. The geri cant the tabby. If someone miniate the tabby and they are sneak then the tabby is sneak. If the tabby cant the geri then the geri is pietistic. If someone cant the tabby then the tabby is sneak. If someone cant the tabby and they visit the tabby then they eat the tabby. If someone is breathing then they are pietistic. If someone cant the tabby and the tabby is sneak then the tabby protest the geri. The tabby is sneak.", "logic": "\nMiniate(tabby, geri)\nCant(geri, tabby)\nforall x (Miniate(x, tabby) and Sneak(x) -> Sneak(tabby))\nCant(tabby, geri) -> Pietistic(geri)\nforall x (Cant(x, tabby) -> Sneak(tabby))\nforall x (Cant(x, tabby) and Miniate(x, tabby) -> Protest(x, tabby))\nforall x (Breathing(x) -> Pietistic(x))\nforall x (Cant(x, tabby) and Sneak(tabby) -> Protest(tabby, geri))\n\nSneak(tabby)\n\nCant(geri, tabby) and forall x (Cant(x, tabby) -> Sneak(tabby)) -> therefore Sneak(tabby)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "The celle devolve the voltaire. The voltaire dilute the celle. If someone devolve the celle and they are material then the celle is material. If the celle dilute the voltaire then the voltaire is nearby. If someone dilute the celle then the celle is material. If someone dilute the celle and they visit the celle then they eat the celle. If someone is unwavering then they are nearby. If someone dilute the celle and the celle is material then the celle churr the voltaire. The celle is not material.", "logic": "\nDevolve(celle, voltaire)\nDilute(voltaire, celle)\nforall x (Devolve(x, celle) and Material(x) -> Material(celle))\nDilute(celle, voltaire) -> Nearby(voltaire)\nforall x (Dilute(x, celle) -> Material(celle))\nforall x (Dilute(x, celle) and Devolve(x, celle) -> Churr(x, celle))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> Nearby(x))\nforall x (Dilute(x, celle) and Material(celle) -> Churr(celle, voltaire))\n\nnot Material(celle)\n\nDilute(voltaire, celle) and forall x (Dilute(x, celle) -> Material(celle)) -> therefore Material(celle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "The lavinie sailplane the rahal. The rahal cachinnate the lavinie. If someone sailplane the lavinie and they are unreal then the lavinie is unreal. If the lavinie cachinnate the rahal then the rahal is unshelled. If someone cachinnate the lavinie then the lavinie is unreal. If someone cachinnate the lavinie and they visit the lavinie then they eat the lavinie. If someone is polychrome then they are unshelled. If someone cachinnate the lavinie and the lavinie is unreal then the lavinie freelance the rahal. The lavinie does not eat the lavinie.", "logic": "\nSailplane(lavinie, rahal)\nCachinnate(rahal, lavinie)\nforall x (Sailplane(x, lavinie) and Unreal(x) -> Unreal(lavinie))\nCachinnate(lavinie, rahal) -> Unshelled(rahal)\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, lavinie) -> Unreal(lavinie))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, lavinie) and Sailplane(x, lavinie) -> Freelance(x, lavinie))\nforall x (Polychrome(x) -> Unshelled(x))\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, lavinie) and Unreal(lavinie) -> Freelance(lavinie, rahal))\n\nnot Freelance(lavinie, lavinie)\n\nforall x (Cachinnate(x, lavinie) and Sailplane(x, lavinie) -> Freelance(x, lavinie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "The camila flake the adi. The adi scuff the camila. If someone flake the camila and they are alular then the camila is alular. If the camila scuff the adi then the adi is urbanized. If someone scuff the camila then the camila is alular. If someone scuff the camila and they visit the camila then they eat the camila. If someone is saponified then they are urbanized. If someone scuff the camila and the camila is alular then the camila kill the adi. The adi kill the camila.", "logic": "\nFlake(camila, adi)\nScuff(adi, camila)\nforall x (Flake(x, camila) and Alular(x) -> Alular(camila))\nScuff(camila, adi) -> Urbanized(adi)\nforall x (Scuff(x, camila) -> Alular(camila))\nforall x (Scuff(x, camila) and Flake(x, camila) -> Kill(x, camila))\nforall x (Saponified(x) -> Urbanized(x))\nforall x (Scuff(x, camila) and Alular(camila) -> Kill(camila, adi))\n\nKill(adi, camila)\n\nforall x (Scuff(x, camila) and Flake(x, camila) -> Kill(x, camila)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "The ingaborg clunk the kym. The kym boomerang the ingaborg. If someone clunk the ingaborg and they are dopey then the ingaborg is dopey. If the ingaborg boomerang the kym then the kym is fragmented. If someone boomerang the ingaborg then the ingaborg is dopey. If someone boomerang the ingaborg and they visit the ingaborg then they eat the ingaborg. If someone is softening then they are fragmented. If someone boomerang the ingaborg and the ingaborg is dopey then the ingaborg copulate the kym. The ingaborg is not big.", "logic": "\nClunk(ingaborg, kym)\nBoomerang(kym, ingaborg)\nforall x (Clunk(x, ingaborg) and Dopey(x) -> Dopey(ingaborg))\nBoomerang(ingaborg, kym) -> Fragmented(kym)\nforall x (Boomerang(x, ingaborg) -> Dopey(ingaborg))\nforall x (Boomerang(x, ingaborg) and Clunk(x, ingaborg) -> Copulate(x, ingaborg))\nforall x (Softening(x) -> Fragmented(x))\nforall x (Boomerang(x, ingaborg) and Dopey(ingaborg) -> Copulate(ingaborg, kym))\n\nnot Big(ingaborg)\n\nnot Big(ingaborg) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "The karim scrutinize the walden. The walden coldcock the karim. If someone scrutinize the karim and they are anapestic then the karim is anapestic. If the karim coldcock the walden then the walden is deadlocked. If someone coldcock the karim then the karim is anapestic. If someone coldcock the karim and they visit the karim then they eat the karim. If someone is lashing then they are deadlocked. If someone coldcock the karim and the karim is anapestic then the karim thicken the walden. The karim coldcock the karim.", "logic": "\nScrutinize(karim, walden)\nColdcock(walden, karim)\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, karim) and Anapestic(x) -> Anapestic(karim))\nColdcock(karim, walden) -> Deadlocked(walden)\nforall x (Coldcock(x, karim) -> Anapestic(karim))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, karim) and Scrutinize(x, karim) -> Thicken(x, karim))\nforall x (Lashing(x) -> Deadlocked(x))\nforall x (Coldcock(x, karim) and Anapestic(karim) -> Thicken(karim, walden))\n\nColdcock(karim, karim)\n\nColdcock(karim, karim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-3105"} {"premises": "Pen is haemic. Pen is pinched. Pen is shamanist. Pen is downtown. Pen is cytolytic. Abbie is palatal. Abbie is pinched. Abbie is downtown. Abbie is cytolytic. Angil is haemic. Angil is palatal. Angil is shamanist. Conni is haemic. Conni is palatal. Conni is pinched. Conni is cytolytic. All pinched, trusted things are haemic. All pinched things are shamanist. If Abbie is haemic and Abbie is shamanist then Abbie is downtown. Cold, haemic things are pinched. All haemic, cytolytic things are shamanist. If something is haemic and palatal then it is pinched. Pen is shamanist.", "logic": "\nHaemic(pen)\nPinched(pen)\nShamanist(pen)\nDowntown(pen)\nCytolytic(pen)\nPalatal(abbie)\nPinched(abbie)\nDowntown(abbie)\nCytolytic(abbie)\nHaemic(angil)\nPalatal(angil)\nShamanist(angil)\nHaemic(conni)\nPalatal(conni)\nPinched(conni)\nCytolytic(conni)\nforall x (Pinched(x) and Trusted(x) -> Haemic(x))\nforall x (Pinched(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nHaemic(abbie) and Shamanist(abbie) -> Downtown(abbie)\nforall x (Palatal(x) and Haemic(x) -> Pinched(x))\nforall x (Haemic(x) and Cytolytic(x) -> Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Haemic(x) and Palatal(x) -> Pinched(x))\n\nShamanist(pen)\n\ntherefore Shamanist(pen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3366"} {"premises": "Ioana is hypaethral. Ioana is jammed. Ioana is undulant. Ioana is enervating. Ioana is profound. Wolfy is inebriated. Wolfy is jammed. Wolfy is enervating. Wolfy is profound. Dulcy is hypaethral. Dulcy is inebriated. Dulcy is undulant. Nedi is hypaethral. Nedi is inebriated. Nedi is jammed. Nedi is profound. All jammed, avowed things are hypaethral. All jammed things are undulant. If Wolfy is hypaethral and Wolfy is undulant then Wolfy is enervating. Cold, hypaethral things are jammed. All hypaethral, profound things are undulant. If something is hypaethral and inebriated then it is jammed. Wolfy is not enervating.", "logic": "\nHypaethral(ioana)\nJammed(ioana)\nUndulant(ioana)\nEnervating(ioana)\nProfound(ioana)\nInebriated(wolfy)\nJammed(wolfy)\nEnervating(wolfy)\nProfound(wolfy)\nHypaethral(dulcy)\nInebriated(dulcy)\nUndulant(dulcy)\nHypaethral(nedi)\nInebriated(nedi)\nJammed(nedi)\nProfound(nedi)\nforall x (Jammed(x) and Avowed(x) -> Hypaethral(x))\nforall x (Jammed(x) -> Undulant(x))\nHypaethral(wolfy) and Undulant(wolfy) -> Enervating(wolfy)\nforall x (Inebriated(x) and Hypaethral(x) -> Jammed(x))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) and Profound(x) -> Undulant(x))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) and Inebriated(x) -> Jammed(x))\n\nnot Enervating(wolfy)\n\ntherefore Enervating(wolfy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3366"} {"premises": "Toinette is supportive. Toinette is snarled. Toinette is shocking. Toinette is retinal. Toinette is adjuvant. Timmi is comradely. Timmi is snarled. Timmi is retinal. Timmi is adjuvant. Kaleb is supportive. Kaleb is comradely. Kaleb is shocking. Analiese is supportive. Analiese is comradely. Analiese is snarled. Analiese is adjuvant. All snarled, milanese things are supportive. All snarled things are shocking. If Timmi is supportive and Timmi is shocking then Timmi is retinal. Cold, supportive things are snarled. All supportive, adjuvant things are shocking. If something is supportive and comradely then it is snarled. Timmi is not supportive.", "logic": "\nSupportive(toinette)\nSnarled(toinette)\nShocking(toinette)\nRetinal(toinette)\nAdjuvant(toinette)\nComradely(timmi)\nSnarled(timmi)\nRetinal(timmi)\nAdjuvant(timmi)\nSupportive(kaleb)\nComradely(kaleb)\nShocking(kaleb)\nSupportive(analiese)\nComradely(analiese)\nSnarled(analiese)\nAdjuvant(analiese)\nforall x (Snarled(x) and Milanese(x) -> Supportive(x))\nforall x (Snarled(x) -> Shocking(x))\nSupportive(timmi) and Shocking(timmi) -> Retinal(timmi)\nforall x (Comradely(x) and Supportive(x) -> Snarled(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) and Adjuvant(x) -> Shocking(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) and Comradely(x) -> Snarled(x))\n\nnot Supportive(timmi)\n\nforall x (Snarled(x) and Milanese(x) -> Supportive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3366"} {"premises": "Ilene is incurable. Ilene is cumulative. Ilene is pedigreed. Ilene is dextrorse. Ilene is pointless. Braden is buzzing. Braden is cumulative. Braden is dextrorse. Braden is pointless. Jaymee is incurable. Jaymee is buzzing. Jaymee is pedigreed. Prisca is incurable. Prisca is buzzing. Prisca is cumulative. Prisca is pointless. All cumulative, collegiate things are incurable. All cumulative things are pedigreed. If Braden is incurable and Braden is pedigreed then Braden is dextrorse. Cold, incurable things are cumulative. All incurable, pointless things are pedigreed. If something is incurable and buzzing then it is cumulative. Prisca is collegiate.", "logic": "\nIncurable(ilene)\nCumulative(ilene)\nPedigreed(ilene)\nDextrorse(ilene)\nPointless(ilene)\nBuzzing(braden)\nCumulative(braden)\nDextrorse(braden)\nPointless(braden)\nIncurable(jaymee)\nBuzzing(jaymee)\nPedigreed(jaymee)\nIncurable(prisca)\nBuzzing(prisca)\nCumulative(prisca)\nPointless(prisca)\nforall x (Cumulative(x) and Collegiate(x) -> Incurable(x))\nforall x (Cumulative(x) -> Pedigreed(x))\nIncurable(braden) and Pedigreed(braden) -> Dextrorse(braden)\nforall x (Buzzing(x) and Incurable(x) -> Cumulative(x))\nforall x (Incurable(x) and Pointless(x) -> Pedigreed(x))\nforall x (Incurable(x) and Buzzing(x) -> Cumulative(x))\n\nCollegiate(prisca)\n\nCollegiate(prisca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3366"} {"premises": "Noah is deformed. Noah is phylliform. Annemarie is mesmerized. If someone is unstinting then they are sunburned. Nice, phylliform people are monstrous. Furry people are sunburned. Noah is phylliform.", "logic": "\nDeformed(noah)\nPhylliform(noah)\nMesmerized(annemarie)\nforall x (Unstinting(x) -> Sunburned(x))\nforall x (Deformed(x) and Phylliform(x) -> Monstrous(x))\nforall x (Carbolated(x) -> Sunburned(x))\n\nPhylliform(noah)\n\ntherefore Phylliform(noah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1098"} {"premises": "Sibilla is azoic. Sibilla is abrupt. Phil is shelflike. If someone is hemal then they are blabby. Nice, abrupt people are deviate. Furry people are blabby. Sibilla is not abrupt.", "logic": "\nAzoic(sibilla)\nAbrupt(sibilla)\nShelflike(phil)\nforall x (Hemal(x) -> Blabby(x))\nforall x (Azoic(x) and Abrupt(x) -> Deviate(x))\nforall x (Flaxen(x) -> Blabby(x))\n\nnot Abrupt(sibilla)\n\ntherefore Abrupt(sibilla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1098"} {"premises": "Clinton is galactic. Clinton is balking. Tomiko is myopic. If someone is darned then they are dipylon. Nice, balking people are glacial. Furry people are dipylon. Tomiko is not dipylon.", "logic": "\nGalactic(clinton)\nBalking(clinton)\nMyopic(tomiko)\nforall x (Darned(x) -> Dipylon(x))\nforall x (Galactic(x) and Balking(x) -> Glacial(x))\nforall x (Neural(x) -> Dipylon(x))\n\nnot Dipylon(tomiko)\n\nforall x (Darned(x) -> Dipylon(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1098"} {"premises": "Kiri is releasing. Kiri is cutting. Nerte is womanish. If someone is pupillary then they are xanthous. Nice, cutting people are aspiring. Furry people are xanthous. Nerte is releasing.", "logic": "\nReleasing(kiri)\nCutting(kiri)\nWomanish(nerte)\nforall x (Pupillary(x) -> Xanthous(x))\nforall x (Releasing(x) and Cutting(x) -> Aspiring(x))\nforall x (Usable(x) -> Xanthous(x))\n\nReleasing(nerte)\n\nReleasing(nerte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1098"} {"premises": "The sue is unafraid. The sergei pursue the carly. The carly is drudging. If something is unafraid then it chatter the carly. If something chatter the sue and the sue is illogical then it live the sergei. If the sue chatter the carly then the carly is unafraid. The sergei pursue the carly.", "logic": "\nUnafraid(sue)\nPursue(sergei, carly)\nDrudging(carly)\nforall x (Unafraid(x) -> Chatter(x, carly))\nforall x (Chatter(x, sue) and Illogical(sue) -> Live(x, sergei))\nChatter(sue, carly) -> Unafraid(carly)\n\nPursue(sergei, carly)\n\ntherefore Pursue(sergei, carly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The fraser is hebraical. The bette crop the sharron. The sharron is preceding. If something is hebraical then it quarter the sharron. If something quarter the fraser and the fraser is familial then it perfect the bette. If the fraser quarter the sharron then the sharron is hebraical. The fraser is not hebraical.", "logic": "\nHebraical(fraser)\nCrop(bette, sharron)\nPreceding(sharron)\nforall x (Hebraical(x) -> Quarter(x, sharron))\nforall x (Quarter(x, fraser) and Familial(fraser) -> Perfect(x, bette))\nQuarter(fraser, sharron) -> Hebraical(sharron)\n\nnot Hebraical(fraser)\n\ntherefore Hebraical(fraser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The wit is pancreatic. The quentin resuspend the lavina. The lavina is defeasible. If something is pancreatic then it perforate the lavina. If something perforate the wit and the wit is cleanable then it tenant the quentin. If the wit perforate the lavina then the lavina is pancreatic. The wit perforate the lavina.", "logic": "\nPancreatic(wit)\nResuspend(quentin, lavina)\nDefeasible(lavina)\nforall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Perforate(x, lavina))\nforall x (Perforate(x, wit) and Cleanable(wit) -> Tenant(x, quentin))\nPerforate(wit, lavina) -> Pancreatic(lavina)\n\nPerforate(wit, lavina)\n\nPancreatic(wit) and forall x (Pancreatic(x) -> Perforate(x, lavina)) -> therefore Perforate(wit, lavina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The laurena is infectious. The belia whore the dugan. The dugan is grazed. If something is infectious then it lateralize the dugan. If something lateralize the laurena and the laurena is mercerized then it stride the belia. If the laurena lateralize the dugan then the dugan is infectious. The laurena does not need the dugan.", "logic": "\nInfectious(laurena)\nWhore(belia, dugan)\nGrazed(dugan)\nforall x (Infectious(x) -> Lateralize(x, dugan))\nforall x (Lateralize(x, laurena) and Mercerized(laurena) -> Stride(x, belia))\nLateralize(laurena, dugan) -> Infectious(dugan)\n\nnot Lateralize(laurena, dugan)\n\nInfectious(laurena) and forall x (Infectious(x) -> Lateralize(x, dugan)) -> therefore Lateralize(laurena, dugan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The simonne is breasted. The sergent outgeneral the midge. The midge is aimless. If something is breasted then it premiere the midge. If something premiere the simonne and the simonne is retinal then it dislike the sergent. If the simonne premiere the midge then the midge is breasted. The midge is breasted.", "logic": "\nBreasted(simonne)\nOutgeneral(sergent, midge)\nAimless(midge)\nforall x (Breasted(x) -> Premiere(x, midge))\nforall x (Premiere(x, simonne) and Retinal(simonne) -> Dislike(x, sergent))\nPremiere(simonne, midge) -> Breasted(midge)\n\nBreasted(midge)\n\nBreasted(simonne) and forall x (Breasted(x) -> Premiere(x, midge)) -> therefore Premiere(simonne, midge) Premiere(simonne, midge) and Premiere(simonne, midge) -> Breasted(midge) -> therefore Breasted(midge)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The charleton is dominant. The caro document the daryn. The daryn is dank. If something is dominant then it frisk the daryn. If something frisk the charleton and the charleton is untrodden then it honeymoon the caro. If the charleton frisk the daryn then the daryn is dominant. The daryn is not dominant.", "logic": "\nDominant(charleton)\nDocument(caro, daryn)\nDank(daryn)\nforall x (Dominant(x) -> Frisk(x, daryn))\nforall x (Frisk(x, charleton) and Untrodden(charleton) -> Honeymoon(x, caro))\nFrisk(charleton, daryn) -> Dominant(daryn)\n\nnot Dominant(daryn)\n\nDominant(charleton) and forall x (Dominant(x) -> Frisk(x, daryn)) -> therefore Frisk(charleton, daryn) Frisk(charleton, daryn) and Frisk(charleton, daryn) -> Dominant(daryn) -> therefore Dominant(daryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The janetta is bosnian. The bret relay the adolf. The adolf is anglican. If something is bosnian then it crochet the adolf. If something crochet the janetta and the janetta is guileless then it hire the bret. If the janetta crochet the adolf then the adolf is bosnian. The adolf crochet the adolf.", "logic": "\nBosnian(janetta)\nRelay(bret, adolf)\nAnglican(adolf)\nforall x (Bosnian(x) -> Crochet(x, adolf))\nforall x (Crochet(x, janetta) and Guileless(janetta) -> Hire(x, bret))\nCrochet(janetta, adolf) -> Bosnian(adolf)\n\nCrochet(adolf, adolf)\n\nBosnian(janetta) and forall x (Bosnian(x) -> Crochet(x, adolf)) -> therefore Crochet(janetta, adolf) Crochet(janetta, adolf) and Crochet(janetta, adolf) -> Bosnian(adolf) -> therefore Bosnian(adolf) Bosnian(adolf) and forall x (Bosnian(x) -> Crochet(x, adolf)) -> therefore Crochet(adolf, adolf)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The alexander is deific. The darin guttle the justis. The justis is deserved. If something is deific then it dawdle the justis. If something dawdle the alexander and the alexander is carbonylic then it stare the darin. If the alexander dawdle the justis then the justis is deific. The justis does not need the justis.", "logic": "\nDeific(alexander)\nGuttle(darin, justis)\nDeserved(justis)\nforall x (Deific(x) -> Dawdle(x, justis))\nforall x (Dawdle(x, alexander) and Carbonylic(alexander) -> Stare(x, darin))\nDawdle(alexander, justis) -> Deific(justis)\n\nnot Dawdle(justis, justis)\n\nDeific(alexander) and forall x (Deific(x) -> Dawdle(x, justis)) -> therefore Dawdle(alexander, justis) Dawdle(alexander, justis) and Dawdle(alexander, justis) -> Deific(justis) -> therefore Deific(justis) Deific(justis) and forall x (Deific(x) -> Dawdle(x, justis)) -> therefore Dawdle(justis, justis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The ilse is dislikable. The roberto punt the bryna. The bryna is premium. If something is dislikable then it undercut the bryna. If something undercut the ilse and the ilse is uterine then it paint the roberto. If the ilse undercut the bryna then the bryna is dislikable. The roberto does not need the bryna.", "logic": "\nDislikable(ilse)\nPunt(roberto, bryna)\nPremium(bryna)\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Undercut(x, bryna))\nforall x (Undercut(x, ilse) and Uterine(ilse) -> Paint(x, roberto))\nUndercut(ilse, bryna) -> Dislikable(bryna)\n\nnot Undercut(roberto, bryna)\n\nforall x (Dislikable(x) -> Undercut(x, bryna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The dieter is misused. The elias potentiate the nike. The nike is beheaded. If something is misused then it solarise the nike. If something solarise the dieter and the dieter is unforested then it repute the elias. If the dieter solarise the nike then the nike is misused. The dieter repute the elias.", "logic": "\nMisused(dieter)\nPotentiate(elias, nike)\nBeheaded(nike)\nforall x (Misused(x) -> Solarise(x, nike))\nforall x (Solarise(x, dieter) and Unforested(dieter) -> Repute(x, elias))\nSolarise(dieter, nike) -> Misused(nike)\n\nRepute(dieter, elias)\n\nforall x (Solarise(x, dieter) and Unforested(dieter) -> Repute(x, elias)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The stewart is homeward. The alfredo smuggle the obadias. The obadias is noiseless. If something is homeward then it quintuple the obadias. If something quintuple the stewart and the stewart is asat then it stymie the alfredo. If the stewart quintuple the obadias then the obadias is homeward. The obadias does not like the alfredo.", "logic": "\nHomeward(stewart)\nSmuggle(alfredo, obadias)\nNoiseless(obadias)\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> Quintuple(x, obadias))\nforall x (Quintuple(x, stewart) and Asat(stewart) -> Stymie(x, alfredo))\nQuintuple(stewart, obadias) -> Homeward(obadias)\n\nnot Stymie(obadias, alfredo)\n\nforall x (Quintuple(x, stewart) and Asat(stewart) -> Stymie(x, alfredo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The shelbi is finer. The kamillah overspend the francisca. The francisca is carangid. If something is finer then it splotch the francisca. If something splotch the shelbi and the shelbi is quantized then it develop the kamillah. If the shelbi splotch the francisca then the francisca is finer. The kamillah develop the kamillah.", "logic": "\nFiner(shelbi)\nOverspend(kamillah, francisca)\nCarangid(francisca)\nforall x (Finer(x) -> Splotch(x, francisca))\nforall x (Splotch(x, shelbi) and Quantized(shelbi) -> Develop(x, kamillah))\nSplotch(shelbi, francisca) -> Finer(francisca)\n\nDevelop(kamillah, kamillah)\n\nforall x (Splotch(x, shelbi) and Quantized(shelbi) -> Develop(x, kamillah)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The shelli is acneiform. The emogene bereave the kelley. The kelley is creative. If something is acneiform then it growl the kelley. If something growl the shelli and the shelli is universal then it retrace the emogene. If the shelli growl the kelley then the kelley is acneiform. The emogene is not creative.", "logic": "\nAcneiform(shelli)\nBereave(emogene, kelley)\nCreative(kelley)\nforall x (Acneiform(x) -> Growl(x, kelley))\nforall x (Growl(x, shelli) and Universal(shelli) -> Retrace(x, emogene))\nGrowl(shelli, kelley) -> Acneiform(kelley)\n\nnot Creative(emogene)\n\nnot Creative(emogene) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The alameda is sybaritic. The georgine serialize the remy. The remy is aestival. If something is sybaritic then it cable the remy. If something cable the alameda and the alameda is desperate then it rile the georgine. If the alameda cable the remy then the remy is sybaritic. The remy is cold.", "logic": "\nSybaritic(alameda)\nSerialize(georgine, remy)\nAestival(remy)\nforall x (Sybaritic(x) -> Cable(x, remy))\nforall x (Cable(x, alameda) and Desperate(alameda) -> Rile(x, georgine))\nCable(alameda, remy) -> Sybaritic(remy)\n\nCold(remy)\n\nCold(remy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The freemon is criterial. The gabrila predigest the andi. The andi is graduate. If something is criterial then it hide the andi. If something hide the freemon and the freemon is mediaeval then it caddie the gabrila. If the freemon hide the andi then the andi is criterial. The andi does not need the freemon.", "logic": "\nCriterial(freemon)\nPredigest(gabrila, andi)\nGraduate(andi)\nforall x (Criterial(x) -> Hide(x, andi))\nforall x (Hide(x, freemon) and Mediaeval(freemon) -> Caddie(x, gabrila))\nHide(freemon, andi) -> Criterial(andi)\n\nnot Hide(andi, freemon)\n\nnot Hide(andi, freemon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The faunie is fragmented. The rochester plagiarize the bonnie. The bonnie is soldierly. If something is fragmented then it vandalize the bonnie. If something vandalize the faunie and the faunie is enteric then it paganize the rochester. If the faunie vandalize the bonnie then the bonnie is fragmented. The rochester is fragmented.", "logic": "\nFragmented(faunie)\nPlagiarize(rochester, bonnie)\nSoldierly(bonnie)\nforall x (Fragmented(x) -> Vandalize(x, bonnie))\nforall x (Vandalize(x, faunie) and Enteric(faunie) -> Paganize(x, rochester))\nVandalize(faunie, bonnie) -> Fragmented(bonnie)\n\nFragmented(rochester)\n\nFragmented(rochester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The quillan is midwestern. The nelia is softish. The conney does not eat the nelia. If the conney is not allogeneic and the conney does not eat the nelia then the nelia does not like the conney. If something is midwestern then it glow the nelia. If something is midwestern then it blather the conney. If something glow the nelia then it is softish. If something besot the nelia and the nelia besot the quillan then the nelia is not allogeneic. If something is softish then it blather the quillan. If something glow the quillan then the quillan does not eat the conney. If something glow the quillan and it does not see the quillan then the quillan is allogeneic. The conney does not eat the nelia.", "logic": "\nMidwestern(quillan)\nSoftish(nelia)\nnot Besot(conney, nelia)\nnot Allogeneic(conney) and not Besot(conney, nelia) -> not Glow(nelia, conney)\nforall x (Midwestern(x) -> Glow(x, nelia))\nforall x (Midwestern(x) -> Blather(x, conney))\nforall x (Glow(x, nelia) -> Softish(x))\nforall x (Besot(x, nelia) and Besot(nelia, quillan) -> not Allogeneic(nelia))\nforall x (Softish(x) -> Blather(x, quillan))\nforall x (Glow(x, quillan) -> not Besot(quillan, conney))\nforall x (Glow(x, quillan) and not Blather(x, quillan) -> Allogeneic(quillan))\n\nnot Besot(conney, nelia)\n\ntherefore not Besot(conney, nelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The florie is buckram. The arne is underslung. The eadith does not eat the arne. If the eadith is not feathery and the eadith does not eat the arne then the arne does not like the eadith. If something is buckram then it persevere the arne. If something is buckram then it preclude the eadith. If something persevere the arne then it is underslung. If something astound the arne and the arne astound the florie then the arne is not feathery. If something is underslung then it preclude the florie. If something persevere the florie then the florie does not eat the eadith. If something persevere the florie and it does not see the florie then the florie is feathery. The arne is not underslung.", "logic": "\nBuckram(florie)\nUnderslung(arne)\nnot Astound(eadith, arne)\nnot Feathery(eadith) and not Astound(eadith, arne) -> not Persevere(arne, eadith)\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Persevere(x, arne))\nforall x (Buckram(x) -> Preclude(x, eadith))\nforall x (Persevere(x, arne) -> Underslung(x))\nforall x (Astound(x, arne) and Astound(arne, florie) -> not Feathery(arne))\nforall x (Underslung(x) -> Preclude(x, florie))\nforall x (Persevere(x, florie) -> not Astound(florie, eadith))\nforall x (Persevere(x, florie) and not Preclude(x, florie) -> Feathery(florie))\n\nnot Underslung(arne)\n\ntherefore Underslung(arne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The joseph is clxxv. The dacia is knobbly. The lonni does not eat the dacia. If the lonni is not glum and the lonni does not eat the dacia then the dacia does not like the lonni. If something is clxxv then it practice the dacia. If something is clxxv then it salve the lonni. If something practice the dacia then it is knobbly. If something roof the dacia and the dacia roof the joseph then the dacia is not glum. If something is knobbly then it salve the joseph. If something practice the joseph then the joseph does not eat the lonni. If something practice the joseph and it does not see the joseph then the joseph is glum. The joseph salve the lonni.", "logic": "\nClxxv(joseph)\nKnobbly(dacia)\nnot Roof(lonni, dacia)\nnot Glum(lonni) and not Roof(lonni, dacia) -> not Practice(dacia, lonni)\nforall x (Clxxv(x) -> Practice(x, dacia))\nforall x (Clxxv(x) -> Salve(x, lonni))\nforall x (Practice(x, dacia) -> Knobbly(x))\nforall x (Roof(x, dacia) and Roof(dacia, joseph) -> not Glum(dacia))\nforall x (Knobbly(x) -> Salve(x, joseph))\nforall x (Practice(x, joseph) -> not Roof(joseph, lonni))\nforall x (Practice(x, joseph) and not Salve(x, joseph) -> Glum(joseph))\n\nSalve(joseph, lonni)\n\nClxxv(joseph) and forall x (Clxxv(x) -> Salve(x, lonni)) -> therefore Salve(joseph, lonni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The patricio is unexplored. The priscella is motley. The leanna does not eat the priscella. If the leanna is not ingrained and the leanna does not eat the priscella then the priscella does not like the leanna. If something is unexplored then it flaunt the priscella. If something is unexplored then it spud the leanna. If something flaunt the priscella then it is motley. If something strap the priscella and the priscella strap the patricio then the priscella is not ingrained. If something is motley then it spud the patricio. If something flaunt the patricio then the patricio does not eat the leanna. If something flaunt the patricio and it does not see the patricio then the patricio is ingrained. The patricio does not like the priscella.", "logic": "\nUnexplored(patricio)\nMotley(priscella)\nnot Strap(leanna, priscella)\nnot Ingrained(leanna) and not Strap(leanna, priscella) -> not Flaunt(priscella, leanna)\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Flaunt(x, priscella))\nforall x (Unexplored(x) -> Spud(x, leanna))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, priscella) -> Motley(x))\nforall x (Strap(x, priscella) and Strap(priscella, patricio) -> not Ingrained(priscella))\nforall x (Motley(x) -> Spud(x, patricio))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, patricio) -> not Strap(patricio, leanna))\nforall x (Flaunt(x, patricio) and not Spud(x, patricio) -> Ingrained(patricio))\n\nnot Flaunt(patricio, priscella)\n\nUnexplored(patricio) and forall x (Unexplored(x) -> Flaunt(x, priscella)) -> therefore Flaunt(patricio, priscella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The mavra is canted. The ophelie is merry. The joletta does not eat the ophelie. If the joletta is not humble and the joletta does not eat the ophelie then the ophelie does not like the joletta. If something is canted then it whirr the ophelie. If something is canted then it incline the joletta. If something whirr the ophelie then it is merry. If something unitize the ophelie and the ophelie unitize the mavra then the ophelie is not humble. If something is merry then it incline the mavra. If something whirr the mavra then the mavra does not eat the joletta. If something whirr the mavra and it does not see the mavra then the mavra is humble. The mavra is merry.", "logic": "\nCanted(mavra)\nMerry(ophelie)\nnot Unitize(joletta, ophelie)\nnot Humble(joletta) and not Unitize(joletta, ophelie) -> not Whirr(ophelie, joletta)\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Whirr(x, ophelie))\nforall x (Canted(x) -> Incline(x, joletta))\nforall x (Whirr(x, ophelie) -> Merry(x))\nforall x (Unitize(x, ophelie) and Unitize(ophelie, mavra) -> not Humble(ophelie))\nforall x (Merry(x) -> Incline(x, mavra))\nforall x (Whirr(x, mavra) -> not Unitize(mavra, joletta))\nforall x (Whirr(x, mavra) and not Incline(x, mavra) -> Humble(mavra))\n\nMerry(mavra)\n\nCanted(mavra) and forall x (Canted(x) -> Whirr(x, ophelie)) -> therefore Whirr(mavra, ophelie) Whirr(mavra, ophelie) and forall x (Whirr(x, ophelie) -> Merry(x)) -> therefore Merry(mavra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The marrissa is used. The clarette is pebbly. The jessee does not eat the clarette. If the jessee is not snazzy and the jessee does not eat the clarette then the clarette does not like the jessee. If something is used then it rely the clarette. If something is used then it overpower the jessee. If something rely the clarette then it is pebbly. If something ablactate the clarette and the clarette ablactate the marrissa then the clarette is not snazzy. If something is pebbly then it overpower the marrissa. If something rely the marrissa then the marrissa does not eat the jessee. If something rely the marrissa and it does not see the marrissa then the marrissa is snazzy. The marrissa is not pebbly.", "logic": "\nUsed(marrissa)\nPebbly(clarette)\nnot Ablactate(jessee, clarette)\nnot Snazzy(jessee) and not Ablactate(jessee, clarette) -> not Rely(clarette, jessee)\nforall x (Used(x) -> Rely(x, clarette))\nforall x (Used(x) -> Overpower(x, jessee))\nforall x (Rely(x, clarette) -> Pebbly(x))\nforall x (Ablactate(x, clarette) and Ablactate(clarette, marrissa) -> not Snazzy(clarette))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) -> Overpower(x, marrissa))\nforall x (Rely(x, marrissa) -> not Ablactate(marrissa, jessee))\nforall x (Rely(x, marrissa) and not Overpower(x, marrissa) -> Snazzy(marrissa))\n\nnot Pebbly(marrissa)\n\nUsed(marrissa) and forall x (Used(x) -> Rely(x, clarette)) -> therefore Rely(marrissa, clarette) Rely(marrissa, clarette) and forall x (Rely(x, clarette) -> Pebbly(x)) -> therefore Pebbly(marrissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The morley is near. The albert is limited. The josef does not eat the albert. If the josef is not queasy and the josef does not eat the albert then the albert does not like the josef. If something is near then it resubmit the albert. If something is near then it pauperise the josef. If something resubmit the albert then it is limited. If something allege the albert and the albert allege the morley then the albert is not queasy. If something is limited then it pauperise the morley. If something resubmit the morley then the morley does not eat the josef. If something resubmit the morley and it does not see the morley then the morley is queasy. The morley pauperise the morley.", "logic": "\nNear(morley)\nLimited(albert)\nnot Allege(josef, albert)\nnot Queasy(josef) and not Allege(josef, albert) -> not Resubmit(albert, josef)\nforall x (Near(x) -> Resubmit(x, albert))\nforall x (Near(x) -> Pauperise(x, josef))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, albert) -> Limited(x))\nforall x (Allege(x, albert) and Allege(albert, morley) -> not Queasy(albert))\nforall x (Limited(x) -> Pauperise(x, morley))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, morley) -> not Allege(morley, josef))\nforall x (Resubmit(x, morley) and not Pauperise(x, morley) -> Queasy(morley))\n\nPauperise(morley, morley)\n\nNear(morley) and forall x (Near(x) -> Resubmit(x, albert)) -> therefore Resubmit(morley, albert) Resubmit(morley, albert) and forall x (Resubmit(x, albert) -> Limited(x)) -> therefore Limited(morley) Limited(morley) and forall x (Limited(x) -> Pauperise(x, morley)) -> therefore Pauperise(morley, morley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The kally is propitious. The danna is then. The suzann does not eat the danna. If the suzann is not spectral and the suzann does not eat the danna then the danna does not like the suzann. If something is propitious then it goggle the danna. If something is propitious then it camouflage the suzann. If something goggle the danna then it is then. If something bituminise the danna and the danna bituminise the kally then the danna is not spectral. If something is then then it camouflage the kally. If something goggle the kally then the kally does not eat the suzann. If something goggle the kally and it does not see the kally then the kally is spectral. The kally does not see the kally.", "logic": "\nPropitious(kally)\nThen(danna)\nnot Bituminise(suzann, danna)\nnot Spectral(suzann) and not Bituminise(suzann, danna) -> not Goggle(danna, suzann)\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Goggle(x, danna))\nforall x (Propitious(x) -> Camouflage(x, suzann))\nforall x (Goggle(x, danna) -> Then(x))\nforall x (Bituminise(x, danna) and Bituminise(danna, kally) -> not Spectral(danna))\nforall x (Then(x) -> Camouflage(x, kally))\nforall x (Goggle(x, kally) -> not Bituminise(kally, suzann))\nforall x (Goggle(x, kally) and not Camouflage(x, kally) -> Spectral(kally))\n\nnot Camouflage(kally, kally)\n\nPropitious(kally) and forall x (Propitious(x) -> Goggle(x, danna)) -> therefore Goggle(kally, danna) Goggle(kally, danna) and forall x (Goggle(x, danna) -> Then(x)) -> therefore Then(kally) Then(kally) and forall x (Then(x) -> Camouflage(x, kally)) -> therefore Camouflage(kally, kally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The bird is decided. The ronald is syntactic. The ephraim does not eat the ronald. If the ephraim is not congenial and the ephraim does not eat the ronald then the ronald does not like the ephraim. If something is decided then it shore the ronald. If something is decided then it mislay the ephraim. If something shore the ronald then it is syntactic. If something sensitise the ronald and the ronald sensitise the bird then the ronald is not congenial. If something is syntactic then it mislay the bird. If something shore the bird then the bird does not eat the ephraim. If something shore the bird and it does not see the bird then the bird is congenial. The ephraim is not syntactic.", "logic": "\nDecided(bird)\nSyntactic(ronald)\nnot Sensitise(ephraim, ronald)\nnot Congenial(ephraim) and not Sensitise(ephraim, ronald) -> not Shore(ronald, ephraim)\nforall x (Decided(x) -> Shore(x, ronald))\nforall x (Decided(x) -> Mislay(x, ephraim))\nforall x (Shore(x, ronald) -> Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Sensitise(x, ronald) and Sensitise(ronald, bird) -> not Congenial(ronald))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) -> Mislay(x, bird))\nforall x (Shore(x, bird) -> not Sensitise(bird, ephraim))\nforall x (Shore(x, bird) and not Mislay(x, bird) -> Congenial(bird))\n\nnot Syntactic(ephraim)\n\nforall x (Shore(x, ronald) -> Syntactic(x)) <- forall x (Decided(x) -> Shore(x, ronald)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The anjanette is affiliated. The debbra is beautiful. The roberta does not eat the debbra. If the roberta is not epilithic and the roberta does not eat the debbra then the debbra does not like the roberta. If something is affiliated then it vacation the debbra. If something is affiliated then it effeminize the roberta. If something vacation the debbra then it is beautiful. If something rhyme the debbra and the debbra rhyme the anjanette then the debbra is not epilithic. If something is beautiful then it effeminize the anjanette. If something vacation the anjanette then the anjanette does not eat the roberta. If something vacation the anjanette and it does not see the anjanette then the anjanette is epilithic. The anjanette is epilithic.", "logic": "\nAffiliated(anjanette)\nBeautiful(debbra)\nnot Rhyme(roberta, debbra)\nnot Epilithic(roberta) and not Rhyme(roberta, debbra) -> not Vacation(debbra, roberta)\nforall x (Affiliated(x) -> Vacation(x, debbra))\nforall x (Affiliated(x) -> Effeminize(x, roberta))\nforall x (Vacation(x, debbra) -> Beautiful(x))\nforall x (Rhyme(x, debbra) and Rhyme(debbra, anjanette) -> not Epilithic(debbra))\nforall x (Beautiful(x) -> Effeminize(x, anjanette))\nforall x (Vacation(x, anjanette) -> not Rhyme(anjanette, roberta))\nforall x (Vacation(x, anjanette) and not Effeminize(x, anjanette) -> Epilithic(anjanette))\n\nEpilithic(anjanette)\n\nforall x (Vacation(x, anjanette) and not Effeminize(x, anjanette) -> Epilithic(anjanette)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The sander is psychical. The ertha is crabbed. The sibbie does not eat the ertha. If the sibbie is not recent and the sibbie does not eat the ertha then the ertha does not like the sibbie. If something is psychical then it assibilate the ertha. If something is psychical then it format the sibbie. If something assibilate the ertha then it is crabbed. If something surface the ertha and the ertha surface the sander then the ertha is not recent. If something is crabbed then it format the sander. If something assibilate the sander then the sander does not eat the sibbie. If something assibilate the sander and it does not see the sander then the sander is recent. The ertha does not see the sibbie.", "logic": "\nPsychical(sander)\nCrabbed(ertha)\nnot Surface(sibbie, ertha)\nnot Recent(sibbie) and not Surface(sibbie, ertha) -> not Assibilate(ertha, sibbie)\nforall x (Psychical(x) -> Assibilate(x, ertha))\nforall x (Psychical(x) -> Format(x, sibbie))\nforall x (Assibilate(x, ertha) -> Crabbed(x))\nforall x (Surface(x, ertha) and Surface(ertha, sander) -> not Recent(ertha))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) -> Format(x, sander))\nforall x (Assibilate(x, sander) -> not Surface(sander, sibbie))\nforall x (Assibilate(x, sander) and not Format(x, sander) -> Recent(sander))\n\nnot Format(ertha, sibbie)\n\nforall x (Psychical(x) -> Format(x, sibbie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The perri is croaky. The valerye is corrupt. The fonzie does not eat the valerye. If the fonzie is not outsize and the fonzie does not eat the valerye then the valerye does not like the fonzie. If something is croaky then it riddle the valerye. If something is croaky then it freight the fonzie. If something riddle the valerye then it is corrupt. If something pare the valerye and the valerye pare the perri then the valerye is not outsize. If something is corrupt then it freight the perri. If something riddle the perri then the perri does not eat the fonzie. If something riddle the perri and it does not see the perri then the perri is outsize. The valerye riddle the valerye.", "logic": "\nCroaky(perri)\nCorrupt(valerye)\nnot Pare(fonzie, valerye)\nnot Outsize(fonzie) and not Pare(fonzie, valerye) -> not Riddle(valerye, fonzie)\nforall x (Croaky(x) -> Riddle(x, valerye))\nforall x (Croaky(x) -> Freight(x, fonzie))\nforall x (Riddle(x, valerye) -> Corrupt(x))\nforall x (Pare(x, valerye) and Pare(valerye, perri) -> not Outsize(valerye))\nforall x (Corrupt(x) -> Freight(x, perri))\nforall x (Riddle(x, perri) -> not Pare(perri, fonzie))\nforall x (Riddle(x, perri) and not Freight(x, perri) -> Outsize(perri))\n\nRiddle(valerye, valerye)\n\nforall x (Croaky(x) -> Riddle(x, valerye)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The aleta is offstage. The joice is reckless. The alley does not eat the joice. If the alley is not zippy and the alley does not eat the joice then the joice does not like the alley. If something is offstage then it flunk the joice. If something is offstage then it bollocks the alley. If something flunk the joice then it is reckless. If something trellis the joice and the joice trellis the aleta then the joice is not zippy. If something is reckless then it bollocks the aleta. If something flunk the aleta then the aleta does not eat the alley. If something flunk the aleta and it does not see the aleta then the aleta is zippy. The aleta does not eat the joice.", "logic": "\nOffstage(aleta)\nReckless(joice)\nnot Trellis(alley, joice)\nnot Zippy(alley) and not Trellis(alley, joice) -> not Flunk(joice, alley)\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Flunk(x, joice))\nforall x (Offstage(x) -> Bollocks(x, alley))\nforall x (Flunk(x, joice) -> Reckless(x))\nforall x (Trellis(x, joice) and Trellis(joice, aleta) -> not Zippy(joice))\nforall x (Reckless(x) -> Bollocks(x, aleta))\nforall x (Flunk(x, aleta) -> not Trellis(aleta, alley))\nforall x (Flunk(x, aleta) and not Bollocks(x, aleta) -> Zippy(aleta))\n\nnot Trellis(aleta, joice)\n\nnot Trellis(aleta, joice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The albrecht is utility. The veda is kinetic. The saundra does not eat the veda. If the saundra is not branchiate and the saundra does not eat the veda then the veda does not like the saundra. If something is utility then it novate the veda. If something is utility then it groan the saundra. If something novate the veda then it is kinetic. If something swish the veda and the veda swish the albrecht then the veda is not branchiate. If something is kinetic then it groan the albrecht. If something novate the albrecht then the albrecht does not eat the saundra. If something novate the albrecht and it does not see the albrecht then the albrecht is branchiate. The albrecht novate the saundra.", "logic": "\nUtility(albrecht)\nKinetic(veda)\nnot Swish(saundra, veda)\nnot Branchiate(saundra) and not Swish(saundra, veda) -> not Novate(veda, saundra)\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Novate(x, veda))\nforall x (Utility(x) -> Groan(x, saundra))\nforall x (Novate(x, veda) -> Kinetic(x))\nforall x (Swish(x, veda) and Swish(veda, albrecht) -> not Branchiate(veda))\nforall x (Kinetic(x) -> Groan(x, albrecht))\nforall x (Novate(x, albrecht) -> not Swish(albrecht, saundra))\nforall x (Novate(x, albrecht) and not Groan(x, albrecht) -> Branchiate(albrecht))\n\nNovate(albrecht, saundra)\n\nNovate(albrecht, saundra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The peyton is ductile. The coriss is bermudan. The blayne does not eat the coriss. If the blayne is not outgoing and the blayne does not eat the coriss then the coriss does not like the blayne. If something is ductile then it discard the coriss. If something is ductile then it murmur the blayne. If something discard the coriss then it is bermudan. If something farrow the coriss and the coriss farrow the peyton then the coriss is not outgoing. If something is bermudan then it murmur the peyton. If something discard the peyton then the peyton does not eat the blayne. If something discard the peyton and it does not see the peyton then the peyton is outgoing. The blayne is not blue.", "logic": "\nDuctile(peyton)\nBermudan(coriss)\nnot Farrow(blayne, coriss)\nnot Outgoing(blayne) and not Farrow(blayne, coriss) -> not Discard(coriss, blayne)\nforall x (Ductile(x) -> Discard(x, coriss))\nforall x (Ductile(x) -> Murmur(x, blayne))\nforall x (Discard(x, coriss) -> Bermudan(x))\nforall x (Farrow(x, coriss) and Farrow(coriss, peyton) -> not Outgoing(coriss))\nforall x (Bermudan(x) -> Murmur(x, peyton))\nforall x (Discard(x, peyton) -> not Farrow(peyton, blayne))\nforall x (Discard(x, peyton) and not Murmur(x, peyton) -> Outgoing(peyton))\n\nnot Blue(blayne)\n\nnot Blue(blayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "The martainn is bottomed. The mada is aged. The noach does not eat the mada. If the noach is not vigorous and the noach does not eat the mada then the mada does not like the noach. If something is bottomed then it terrify the mada. If something is bottomed then it outsource the noach. If something terrify the mada then it is aged. If something inmarry the mada and the mada inmarry the martainn then the mada is not vigorous. If something is aged then it outsource the martainn. If something terrify the martainn then the martainn does not eat the noach. If something terrify the martainn and it does not see the martainn then the martainn is vigorous. The noach is round.", "logic": "\nBottomed(martainn)\nAged(mada)\nnot Inmarry(noach, mada)\nnot Vigorous(noach) and not Inmarry(noach, mada) -> not Terrify(mada, noach)\nforall x (Bottomed(x) -> Terrify(x, mada))\nforall x (Bottomed(x) -> Outsource(x, noach))\nforall x (Terrify(x, mada) -> Aged(x))\nforall x (Inmarry(x, mada) and Inmarry(mada, martainn) -> not Vigorous(mada))\nforall x (Aged(x) -> Outsource(x, martainn))\nforall x (Terrify(x, martainn) -> not Inmarry(martainn, noach))\nforall x (Terrify(x, martainn) and not Outsource(x, martainn) -> Vigorous(martainn))\n\nRound(noach)\n\nRound(noach) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-423"} {"premises": "Waly is beneficed. Vlad is furious. Vlad is sullen. Vlad is azimuthal. Ryann is fastened. Ryann is furious. Ryann is lingulate. Ryann is slumbery. Ryann is sullen. Ryann is azimuthal. Ryann is beneficed. Mellissa is fastened. Mellissa is lingulate. Mellissa is slumbery. Mellissa is beneficed. If someone is slumbery and beneficed then they are fastened. If someone is beneficed and fastened then they are sullen. If Ryann is furious then Ryann is sullen. If Waly is azimuthal then Waly is beneficed. All fastened people are azimuthal. If Vlad is lingulate then Vlad is beneficed. Vlad is azimuthal.", "logic": "\nBeneficed(waly)\nFurious(vlad)\nSullen(vlad)\nAzimuthal(vlad)\nFastened(ryann)\nFurious(ryann)\nLingulate(ryann)\nSlumbery(ryann)\nSullen(ryann)\nAzimuthal(ryann)\nBeneficed(ryann)\nFastened(mellissa)\nLingulate(mellissa)\nSlumbery(mellissa)\nBeneficed(mellissa)\nforall x (Slumbery(x) and Beneficed(x) -> Fastened(x))\nforall x (Beneficed(x) and Fastened(x) -> Sullen(x))\nFurious(ryann) -> Sullen(ryann)\nAzimuthal(waly) -> Beneficed(waly)\nforall x (Fastened(x) -> Azimuthal(x))\nLingulate(vlad) -> Beneficed(vlad)\n\nAzimuthal(vlad)\n\ntherefore Azimuthal(vlad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Sheree is appraising. Thalia is unshapen. Thalia is texan. Thalia is implacable. Ann is plentiful. Ann is unshapen. Ann is unservile. Ann is trapped. Ann is texan. Ann is implacable. Ann is appraising. Karna is plentiful. Karna is unservile. Karna is trapped. Karna is appraising. If someone is trapped and appraising then they are plentiful. If someone is appraising and plentiful then they are texan. If Ann is unshapen then Ann is texan. If Sheree is implacable then Sheree is appraising. All plentiful people are implacable. If Thalia is unservile then Thalia is appraising. Ann is not plentiful.", "logic": "\nAppraising(sheree)\nUnshapen(thalia)\nTexan(thalia)\nImplacable(thalia)\nPlentiful(ann)\nUnshapen(ann)\nUnservile(ann)\nTrapped(ann)\nTexan(ann)\nImplacable(ann)\nAppraising(ann)\nPlentiful(karna)\nUnservile(karna)\nTrapped(karna)\nAppraising(karna)\nforall x (Trapped(x) and Appraising(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Appraising(x) and Plentiful(x) -> Texan(x))\nUnshapen(ann) -> Texan(ann)\nImplacable(sheree) -> Appraising(sheree)\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> Implacable(x))\nUnservile(thalia) -> Appraising(thalia)\n\nnot Plentiful(ann)\n\ntherefore Plentiful(ann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Moyra is preferent. Quincey is parvenue. Quincey is rubbishy. Quincey is northwest. Caresse is atoxic. Caresse is parvenue. Caresse is vaporized. Caresse is leisured. Caresse is rubbishy. Caresse is northwest. Caresse is preferent. Timi is atoxic. Timi is vaporized. Timi is leisured. Timi is preferent. If someone is leisured and preferent then they are atoxic. If someone is preferent and atoxic then they are rubbishy. If Caresse is parvenue then Caresse is rubbishy. If Moyra is northwest then Moyra is preferent. All atoxic people are northwest. If Quincey is vaporized then Quincey is preferent. Timi is northwest.", "logic": "\nPreferent(moyra)\nParvenue(quincey)\nRubbishy(quincey)\nNorthwest(quincey)\nAtoxic(caresse)\nParvenue(caresse)\nVaporized(caresse)\nLeisured(caresse)\nRubbishy(caresse)\nNorthwest(caresse)\nPreferent(caresse)\nAtoxic(timi)\nVaporized(timi)\nLeisured(timi)\nPreferent(timi)\nforall x (Leisured(x) and Preferent(x) -> Atoxic(x))\nforall x (Preferent(x) and Atoxic(x) -> Rubbishy(x))\nParvenue(caresse) -> Rubbishy(caresse)\nNorthwest(moyra) -> Preferent(moyra)\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Northwest(x))\nVaporized(quincey) -> Preferent(quincey)\n\nNorthwest(timi)\n\nAtoxic(timi) and forall x (Atoxic(x) -> Northwest(x)) -> therefore Northwest(timi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Alfred is labelled. Dexter is adenoid. Dexter is woolen. Dexter is localised. Matti is uppermost. Matti is adenoid. Matti is broke. Matti is anisogamic. Matti is woolen. Matti is localised. Matti is labelled. Leia is uppermost. Leia is broke. Leia is anisogamic. Leia is labelled. If someone is anisogamic and labelled then they are uppermost. If someone is labelled and uppermost then they are woolen. If Matti is adenoid then Matti is woolen. If Alfred is localised then Alfred is labelled. All uppermost people are localised. If Dexter is broke then Dexter is labelled. Leia is not woolen.", "logic": "\nLabelled(alfred)\nAdenoid(dexter)\nWoolen(dexter)\nLocalised(dexter)\nUppermost(matti)\nAdenoid(matti)\nBroke(matti)\nAnisogamic(matti)\nWoolen(matti)\nLocalised(matti)\nLabelled(matti)\nUppermost(leia)\nBroke(leia)\nAnisogamic(leia)\nLabelled(leia)\nforall x (Anisogamic(x) and Labelled(x) -> Uppermost(x))\nforall x (Labelled(x) and Uppermost(x) -> Woolen(x))\nAdenoid(matti) -> Woolen(matti)\nLocalised(alfred) -> Labelled(alfred)\nforall x (Uppermost(x) -> Localised(x))\nBroke(dexter) -> Labelled(dexter)\n\nnot Woolen(leia)\n\nLabelled(leia) and Uppermost(leia) and forall x (Labelled(x) and Uppermost(x) -> Woolen(x)) -> therefore Woolen(leia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Saundra is ungulate. Charlott is rare. Charlott is dropsical. Charlott is tributary. Corenda is sacral. Corenda is rare. Corenda is agamic. Corenda is hebridean. Corenda is dropsical. Corenda is tributary. Corenda is ungulate. Haven is sacral. Haven is agamic. Haven is hebridean. Haven is ungulate. If someone is hebridean and ungulate then they are sacral. If someone is ungulate and sacral then they are dropsical. If Corenda is rare then Corenda is dropsical. If Saundra is tributary then Saundra is ungulate. All sacral people are tributary. If Charlott is agamic then Charlott is ungulate. Charlott is not ungulate.", "logic": "\nUngulate(saundra)\nRare(charlott)\nDropsical(charlott)\nTributary(charlott)\nSacral(corenda)\nRare(corenda)\nAgamic(corenda)\nHebridean(corenda)\nDropsical(corenda)\nTributary(corenda)\nUngulate(corenda)\nSacral(haven)\nAgamic(haven)\nHebridean(haven)\nUngulate(haven)\nforall x (Hebridean(x) and Ungulate(x) -> Sacral(x))\nforall x (Ungulate(x) and Sacral(x) -> Dropsical(x))\nRare(corenda) -> Dropsical(corenda)\nTributary(saundra) -> Ungulate(saundra)\nforall x (Sacral(x) -> Tributary(x))\nAgamic(charlott) -> Ungulate(charlott)\n\nnot Ungulate(charlott)\n\nAgamic(charlott) -> Ungulate(charlott) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Andree is flowered. Allyn is drastic. Allyn is experient. Allyn is forceless. Willmott is authorised. Willmott is drastic. Willmott is lamented. Willmott is grassy. Willmott is experient. Willmott is forceless. Willmott is flowered. Sigrid is authorised. Sigrid is lamented. Sigrid is grassy. Sigrid is flowered. If someone is grassy and flowered then they are authorised. If someone is flowered and authorised then they are experient. If Willmott is drastic then Willmott is experient. If Andree is forceless then Andree is flowered. All authorised people are forceless. If Allyn is lamented then Allyn is flowered. Andree is experient.", "logic": "\nFlowered(andree)\nDrastic(allyn)\nExperient(allyn)\nForceless(allyn)\nAuthorised(willmott)\nDrastic(willmott)\nLamented(willmott)\nGrassy(willmott)\nExperient(willmott)\nForceless(willmott)\nFlowered(willmott)\nAuthorised(sigrid)\nLamented(sigrid)\nGrassy(sigrid)\nFlowered(sigrid)\nforall x (Grassy(x) and Flowered(x) -> Authorised(x))\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Authorised(x) -> Experient(x))\nDrastic(willmott) -> Experient(willmott)\nForceless(andree) -> Flowered(andree)\nforall x (Authorised(x) -> Forceless(x))\nLamented(allyn) -> Flowered(allyn)\n\nExperient(andree)\n\nforall x (Flowered(x) and Authorised(x) -> Experient(x)) <- forall x (Grassy(x) and Flowered(x) -> Authorised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Ava is tubelike. Vivia is universal. Vivia is impotent. Vivia is ample. Pail is detested. Pail is universal. Pail is profane. Pail is flaring. Pail is impotent. Pail is ample. Pail is tubelike. Nevile is detested. Nevile is profane. Nevile is flaring. Nevile is tubelike. If someone is flaring and tubelike then they are detested. If someone is tubelike and detested then they are impotent. If Pail is universal then Pail is impotent. If Ava is ample then Ava is tubelike. All detested people are ample. If Vivia is profane then Vivia is tubelike. Ava is not flaring.", "logic": "\nTubelike(ava)\nUniversal(vivia)\nImpotent(vivia)\nAmple(vivia)\nDetested(pail)\nUniversal(pail)\nProfane(pail)\nFlaring(pail)\nImpotent(pail)\nAmple(pail)\nTubelike(pail)\nDetested(nevile)\nProfane(nevile)\nFlaring(nevile)\nTubelike(nevile)\nforall x (Flaring(x) and Tubelike(x) -> Detested(x))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) and Detested(x) -> Impotent(x))\nUniversal(pail) -> Impotent(pail)\nAmple(ava) -> Tubelike(ava)\nforall x (Detested(x) -> Ample(x))\nProfane(vivia) -> Tubelike(vivia)\n\nnot Flaring(ava)\n\nnot Flaring(ava) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Jon is sweltry. Cyrill is backmost. Cyrill is softheaded. Cyrill is tapestried. Kirk is stock. Kirk is backmost. Kirk is skanky. Kirk is aliquot. Kirk is softheaded. Kirk is tapestried. Kirk is sweltry. Leona is stock. Leona is skanky. Leona is aliquot. Leona is sweltry. If someone is aliquot and sweltry then they are stock. If someone is sweltry and stock then they are softheaded. If Kirk is backmost then Kirk is softheaded. If Jon is tapestried then Jon is sweltry. All stock people are tapestried. If Cyrill is skanky then Cyrill is sweltry. Cyrill is skanky.", "logic": "\nSweltry(jon)\nBackmost(cyrill)\nSoftheaded(cyrill)\nTapestried(cyrill)\nStock(kirk)\nBackmost(kirk)\nSkanky(kirk)\nAliquot(kirk)\nSoftheaded(kirk)\nTapestried(kirk)\nSweltry(kirk)\nStock(leona)\nSkanky(leona)\nAliquot(leona)\nSweltry(leona)\nforall x (Aliquot(x) and Sweltry(x) -> Stock(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Stock(x) -> Softheaded(x))\nBackmost(kirk) -> Softheaded(kirk)\nTapestried(jon) -> Sweltry(jon)\nforall x (Stock(x) -> Tapestried(x))\nSkanky(cyrill) -> Sweltry(cyrill)\n\nSkanky(cyrill)\n\nSkanky(cyrill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1440"} {"premises": "Kip is ambivalent. Shelley is rousing. Zita is altered. Mandy is acceptive. All acceptive people are altered. All altered people are wainscoted. If someone is acceptive and rousing then they are wainscoted. If someone is altered and not wainscoted then they are colombian. Quiet, colombian people are ambivalent. Smart people are ambivalent. Shelley is rousing.", "logic": "\nAmbivalent(kip)\nRousing(shelley)\nAltered(zita)\nAcceptive(mandy)\nforall x (Acceptive(x) -> Altered(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Acceptive(x) and Rousing(x) -> Wainscoted(x))\nforall x (Altered(x) and not Wainscoted(x) -> Colombian(x))\nforall x (Eyeless(x) and Colombian(x) -> Ambivalent(x))\nforall x (Wainscoted(x) -> Ambivalent(x))\n\nRousing(shelley)\n\ntherefore Rousing(shelley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Kelci is diclinous. Binny is sabbatic. Ingemar is blustering. French is unfrozen. All unfrozen people are blustering. All blustering people are alluring. If someone is unfrozen and sabbatic then they are alluring. If someone is blustering and not alluring then they are vulcanized. Quiet, vulcanized people are diclinous. Smart people are diclinous. French is not unfrozen.", "logic": "\nDiclinous(kelci)\nSabbatic(binny)\nBlustering(ingemar)\nUnfrozen(french)\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) and Sabbatic(x) -> Alluring(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) and not Alluring(x) -> Vulcanized(x))\nforall x (Abreast(x) and Vulcanized(x) -> Diclinous(x))\nforall x (Alluring(x) -> Diclinous(x))\n\nnot Unfrozen(french)\n\ntherefore Unfrozen(french)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Jock is dialectic. Melba is lusty. Gabbie is separatist. Eudora is plotted. All plotted people are separatist. All separatist people are diaphyseal. If someone is plotted and lusty then they are diaphyseal. If someone is separatist and not diaphyseal then they are mucinoid. Quiet, mucinoid people are dialectic. Smart people are dialectic. Eudora is separatist.", "logic": "\nDialectic(jock)\nLusty(melba)\nSeparatist(gabbie)\nPlotted(eudora)\nforall x (Plotted(x) -> Separatist(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) -> Diaphyseal(x))\nforall x (Plotted(x) and Lusty(x) -> Diaphyseal(x))\nforall x (Separatist(x) and not Diaphyseal(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Lucent(x) and Mucinoid(x) -> Dialectic(x))\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) -> Dialectic(x))\n\nSeparatist(eudora)\n\nPlotted(eudora) and forall x (Plotted(x) -> Separatist(x)) -> therefore Separatist(eudora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Cassandre is ballistic. Arron is recyclable. Libbey is braced. Tootsie is grilled. All grilled people are braced. All braced people are reentrant. If someone is grilled and recyclable then they are reentrant. If someone is braced and not reentrant then they are flawed. Quiet, flawed people are ballistic. Smart people are ballistic. Tootsie is not braced.", "logic": "\nBallistic(cassandre)\nRecyclable(arron)\nBraced(libbey)\nGrilled(tootsie)\nforall x (Grilled(x) -> Braced(x))\nforall x (Braced(x) -> Reentrant(x))\nforall x (Grilled(x) and Recyclable(x) -> Reentrant(x))\nforall x (Braced(x) and not Reentrant(x) -> Flawed(x))\nforall x (Forbidding(x) and Flawed(x) -> Ballistic(x))\nforall x (Reentrant(x) -> Ballistic(x))\n\nnot Braced(tootsie)\n\nGrilled(tootsie) and forall x (Grilled(x) -> Braced(x)) -> therefore Braced(tootsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Stoddard is impetuous. Fleur is nauseated. Donni is grown. Augusta is unbeloved. All unbeloved people are grown. All grown people are tricolor. If someone is unbeloved and nauseated then they are tricolor. If someone is grown and not tricolor then they are bodied. Quiet, bodied people are impetuous. Smart people are impetuous. Donni is impetuous.", "logic": "\nImpetuous(stoddard)\nNauseated(fleur)\nGrown(donni)\nUnbeloved(augusta)\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) -> Grown(x))\nforall x (Grown(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Unbeloved(x) and Nauseated(x) -> Tricolor(x))\nforall x (Grown(x) and not Tricolor(x) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Unvendible(x) and Bodied(x) -> Impetuous(x))\nforall x (Tricolor(x) -> Impetuous(x))\n\nImpetuous(donni)\n\nGrown(donni) and forall x (Grown(x) -> Tricolor(x)) -> therefore Tricolor(donni) Tricolor(donni) and forall x (Tricolor(x) -> Impetuous(x)) -> therefore Impetuous(donni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Risa is snowbound. Ardyth is apical. Bradford is famished. Brinkley is much. All much people are famished. All famished people are chalybeate. If someone is much and apical then they are chalybeate. If someone is famished and not chalybeate then they are oviparous. Quiet, oviparous people are snowbound. Smart people are snowbound. Brinkley is not chalybeate.", "logic": "\nSnowbound(risa)\nApical(ardyth)\nFamished(bradford)\nMuch(brinkley)\nforall x (Much(x) -> Famished(x))\nforall x (Famished(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Much(x) and Apical(x) -> Chalybeate(x))\nforall x (Famished(x) and not Chalybeate(x) -> Oviparous(x))\nforall x (Heavenly(x) and Oviparous(x) -> Snowbound(x))\nforall x (Chalybeate(x) -> Snowbound(x))\n\nnot Chalybeate(brinkley)\n\nMuch(brinkley) and forall x (Much(x) -> Famished(x)) -> therefore Famished(brinkley) Famished(brinkley) and forall x (Famished(x) -> Chalybeate(x)) -> therefore Chalybeate(brinkley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Rhody is electronic. Meara is tallish. Baxter is intimate. Townie is confluent. All confluent people are intimate. All intimate people are oleaginous. If someone is confluent and tallish then they are oleaginous. If someone is intimate and not oleaginous then they are generic. Quiet, generic people are electronic. Smart people are electronic. Townie is electronic.", "logic": "\nElectronic(rhody)\nTallish(meara)\nIntimate(baxter)\nConfluent(townie)\nforall x (Confluent(x) -> Intimate(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Confluent(x) and Tallish(x) -> Oleaginous(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x) and not Oleaginous(x) -> Generic(x))\nforall x (Flabby(x) and Generic(x) -> Electronic(x))\nforall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Electronic(x))\n\nElectronic(townie)\n\nConfluent(townie) and forall x (Confluent(x) -> Intimate(x)) -> therefore Intimate(townie) Intimate(townie) and forall x (Intimate(x) -> Oleaginous(x)) -> therefore Oleaginous(townie) Oleaginous(townie) and forall x (Oleaginous(x) -> Electronic(x)) -> therefore Electronic(townie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Rachelle is blae. Jon is deserving. Rikki is dull. Susie is paperback. All paperback people are dull. All dull people are panamanian. If someone is paperback and deserving then they are panamanian. If someone is dull and not panamanian then they are hindmost. Quiet, hindmost people are blae. Smart people are blae. Susie is not blae.", "logic": "\nBlae(rachelle)\nDeserving(jon)\nDull(rikki)\nPaperback(susie)\nforall x (Paperback(x) -> Dull(x))\nforall x (Dull(x) -> Panamanian(x))\nforall x (Paperback(x) and Deserving(x) -> Panamanian(x))\nforall x (Dull(x) and not Panamanian(x) -> Hindmost(x))\nforall x (Albescent(x) and Hindmost(x) -> Blae(x))\nforall x (Panamanian(x) -> Blae(x))\n\nnot Blae(susie)\n\nPaperback(susie) and forall x (Paperback(x) -> Dull(x)) -> therefore Dull(susie) Dull(susie) and forall x (Dull(x) -> Panamanian(x)) -> therefore Panamanian(susie) Panamanian(susie) and forall x (Panamanian(x) -> Blae(x)) -> therefore Blae(susie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Nathan is meagerly. Blanch is dogging. Sayres is reflex. Shandie is lugubrious. All lugubrious people are reflex. All reflex people are orotund. If someone is lugubrious and dogging then they are orotund. If someone is reflex and not orotund then they are ducal. Quiet, ducal people are meagerly. Smart people are meagerly. Blanch is not reflex.", "logic": "\nMeagerly(nathan)\nDogging(blanch)\nReflex(sayres)\nLugubrious(shandie)\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> Reflex(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) -> Orotund(x))\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) and Dogging(x) -> Orotund(x))\nforall x (Reflex(x) and not Orotund(x) -> Ducal(x))\nforall x (Tufted(x) and Ducal(x) -> Meagerly(x))\nforall x (Orotund(x) -> Meagerly(x))\n\nnot Reflex(blanch)\n\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> Reflex(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Karylin is errhine. Diana is eurasian. Trace is resettled. Meris is trilobate. All trilobate people are resettled. All resettled people are sloppy. If someone is trilobate and eurasian then they are sloppy. If someone is resettled and not sloppy then they are validating. Quiet, validating people are errhine. Smart people are errhine. Karylin is sloppy.", "logic": "\nErrhine(karylin)\nEurasian(diana)\nResettled(trace)\nTrilobate(meris)\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Resettled(x))\nforall x (Resettled(x) -> Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) and Eurasian(x) -> Sloppy(x))\nforall x (Resettled(x) and not Sloppy(x) -> Validating(x))\nforall x (Crustal(x) and Validating(x) -> Errhine(x))\nforall x (Sloppy(x) -> Errhine(x))\n\nSloppy(karylin)\n\nforall x (Resettled(x) -> Sloppy(x)) <- forall x (Trilobate(x) -> Resettled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Sybyl is deceased. Eleanor is semiliquid. Amara is mesmerised. Elsie is sequent. All sequent people are mesmerised. All mesmerised people are diluvian. If someone is sequent and semiliquid then they are diluvian. If someone is mesmerised and not diluvian then they are livable. Quiet, livable people are deceased. Smart people are deceased. Sybyl is not mesmerised.", "logic": "\nDeceased(sybyl)\nSemiliquid(eleanor)\nMesmerised(amara)\nSequent(elsie)\nforall x (Sequent(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Sequent(x) and Semiliquid(x) -> Diluvian(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and not Diluvian(x) -> Livable(x))\nforall x (Diocesan(x) and Livable(x) -> Deceased(x))\nforall x (Diluvian(x) -> Deceased(x))\n\nnot Mesmerised(sybyl)\n\nforall x (Sequent(x) -> Mesmerised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Mathew is xciv. Adrick is scrambled. Elizabet is nauseous. Devonna is spurned. All spurned people are nauseous. All nauseous people are paperlike. If someone is spurned and scrambled then they are paperlike. If someone is nauseous and not paperlike then they are polyoicous. Quiet, polyoicous people are xciv. Smart people are xciv. Adrick is xciv.", "logic": "\nXciv(mathew)\nScrambled(adrick)\nNauseous(elizabet)\nSpurned(devonna)\nforall x (Spurned(x) -> Nauseous(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Spurned(x) and Scrambled(x) -> Paperlike(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) and not Paperlike(x) -> Polyoicous(x))\nforall x (Disyllabic(x) and Polyoicous(x) -> Xciv(x))\nforall x (Paperlike(x) -> Xciv(x))\n\nXciv(adrick)\n\nforall x (Paperlike(x) -> Xciv(x)) <- forall x (Nauseous(x) -> Paperlike(x)) <- forall x (Spurned(x) -> Nauseous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Catlaina is omissible. Thelma is rearmost. Auguste is unpeopled. Lazarus is portable. All portable people are unpeopled. All unpeopled people are austrian. If someone is portable and rearmost then they are austrian. If someone is unpeopled and not austrian then they are unlike. Quiet, unlike people are omissible. Smart people are omissible. Catlaina is not portable.", "logic": "\nOmissible(catlaina)\nRearmost(thelma)\nUnpeopled(auguste)\nPortable(lazarus)\nforall x (Portable(x) -> Unpeopled(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) -> Austrian(x))\nforall x (Portable(x) and Rearmost(x) -> Austrian(x))\nforall x (Unpeopled(x) and not Austrian(x) -> Unlike(x))\nforall x (Anorthitic(x) and Unlike(x) -> Omissible(x))\nforall x (Austrian(x) -> Omissible(x))\n\nnot Portable(catlaina)\n\nnot Portable(catlaina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Gene is unplumbed. Karrah is greenside. Rhona is sectional. Rhianon is wakeless. All wakeless people are sectional. All sectional people are mucinoid. If someone is wakeless and greenside then they are mucinoid. If someone is sectional and not mucinoid then they are viennese. Quiet, viennese people are unplumbed. Smart people are unplumbed. Rhona is wakeless.", "logic": "\nUnplumbed(gene)\nGreenside(karrah)\nSectional(rhona)\nWakeless(rhianon)\nforall x (Wakeless(x) -> Sectional(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Wakeless(x) and Greenside(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Sectional(x) and not Mucinoid(x) -> Viennese(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and Viennese(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> Unplumbed(x))\n\nWakeless(rhona)\n\nWakeless(rhona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Leanora is blockading. Manish is plaguy. Conchita is velar. Thekla is intimate. All intimate people are velar. All velar people are fallible. If someone is intimate and plaguy then they are fallible. If someone is velar and not fallible then they are secure. Quiet, secure people are blockading. Smart people are blockading. Manish is not spheric.", "logic": "\nBlockading(leanora)\nPlaguy(manish)\nVelar(conchita)\nIntimate(thekla)\nforall x (Intimate(x) -> Velar(x))\nforall x (Velar(x) -> Fallible(x))\nforall x (Intimate(x) and Plaguy(x) -> Fallible(x))\nforall x (Velar(x) and not Fallible(x) -> Secure(x))\nforall x (Spheric(x) and Secure(x) -> Blockading(x))\nforall x (Fallible(x) -> Blockading(x))\n\nnot Spheric(manish)\n\nnot Spheric(manish) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "Iago is shoreward. Trenna is squawky. Brice is oily. Tuesday is branchial. All branchial people are oily. All oily people are fanged. If someone is branchial and squawky then they are fanged. If someone is oily and not fanged then they are colloidal. Quiet, colloidal people are shoreward. Smart people are shoreward. Tuesday is unwaxed.", "logic": "\nShoreward(iago)\nSquawky(trenna)\nOily(brice)\nBranchial(tuesday)\nforall x (Branchial(x) -> Oily(x))\nforall x (Oily(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Branchial(x) and Squawky(x) -> Fanged(x))\nforall x (Oily(x) and not Fanged(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Unwaxed(x) and Colloidal(x) -> Shoreward(x))\nforall x (Fanged(x) -> Shoreward(x))\n\nUnwaxed(tuesday)\n\nUnwaxed(tuesday) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-400"} {"premises": "The avery is principled. The avery is chiasmal. The avery visualise the hobart. The avery affix the sharra. The hobart is principled. The hobart is cellular. The hobart is chiasmal. The hobart visualise the avery. The hobart screw the avery. The hobart screw the sharra. The hobart affix the avery. The hobart affix the sharra. The sharra is accepting. The sharra is principled. The sharra is cellular. The sharra visualise the avery. If someone affix the sharra then the sharra screw the hobart. If someone is principled and accepting then they visit the avery. If someone affix the hobart then they like the hobart. If someone screw the hobart then they visit the hobart. If someone is mosaic and principled then they like the sharra. If the hobart is principled and the hobart screw the avery then the hobart visualise the avery. The hobart is chiasmal.", "logic": "\nPrincipled(avery)\nChiasmal(avery)\nVisualise(avery, hobart)\nAffix(avery, sharra)\nPrincipled(hobart)\nCellular(hobart)\nChiasmal(hobart)\nVisualise(hobart, avery)\nScrew(hobart, avery)\nScrew(hobart, sharra)\nAffix(hobart, avery)\nAffix(hobart, sharra)\nAccepting(sharra)\nPrincipled(sharra)\nCellular(sharra)\nVisualise(sharra, avery)\nforall x (Affix(x, sharra) -> Screw(sharra, hobart))\nforall x (Principled(x) and Accepting(x) -> Affix(x, avery))\nforall x (Affix(x, hobart) -> Visualise(x, hobart))\nforall x (Screw(x, hobart) -> Affix(x, hobart))\nforall x (Mosaic(x) and Principled(x) -> Visualise(x, sharra))\nPrincipled(hobart) and Screw(hobart, avery) -> Visualise(hobart, avery)\n\nChiasmal(hobart)\n\ntherefore Chiasmal(hobart)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The anissa is unshoed. The anissa is technical. The anissa shriek the dimitry. The anissa stickle the dara. The dimitry is unshoed. The dimitry is sharpened. The dimitry is technical. The dimitry shriek the anissa. The dimitry indue the anissa. The dimitry indue the dara. The dimitry stickle the anissa. The dimitry stickle the dara. The dara is mitotic. The dara is unshoed. The dara is sharpened. The dara shriek the anissa. If someone stickle the dara then the dara indue the dimitry. If someone is unshoed and mitotic then they visit the anissa. If someone stickle the dimitry then they like the dimitry. If someone indue the dimitry then they visit the dimitry. If someone is likeable and unshoed then they like the dara. If the dimitry is unshoed and the dimitry indue the anissa then the dimitry shriek the anissa. The anissa does not like the dimitry.", "logic": "\nUnshoed(anissa)\nTechnical(anissa)\nShriek(anissa, dimitry)\nStickle(anissa, dara)\nUnshoed(dimitry)\nSharpened(dimitry)\nTechnical(dimitry)\nShriek(dimitry, anissa)\nIndue(dimitry, anissa)\nIndue(dimitry, dara)\nStickle(dimitry, anissa)\nStickle(dimitry, dara)\nMitotic(dara)\nUnshoed(dara)\nSharpened(dara)\nShriek(dara, anissa)\nforall x (Stickle(x, dara) -> Indue(dara, dimitry))\nforall x (Unshoed(x) and Mitotic(x) -> Stickle(x, anissa))\nforall x (Stickle(x, dimitry) -> Shriek(x, dimitry))\nforall x (Indue(x, dimitry) -> Stickle(x, dimitry))\nforall x (Likeable(x) and Unshoed(x) -> Shriek(x, dara))\nUnshoed(dimitry) and Indue(dimitry, anissa) -> Shriek(dimitry, anissa)\n\nnot Shriek(anissa, dimitry)\n\ntherefore Shriek(anissa, dimitry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The stafford is uncreative. The stafford is vicennial. The stafford foist the gen. The stafford criminate the quintin. The gen is uncreative. The gen is phlegmy. The gen is vicennial. The gen foist the stafford. The gen probate the stafford. The gen probate the quintin. The gen criminate the stafford. The gen criminate the quintin. The quintin is unequaled. The quintin is uncreative. The quintin is phlegmy. The quintin foist the stafford. If someone criminate the quintin then the quintin probate the gen. If someone is uncreative and unequaled then they visit the stafford. If someone criminate the gen then they like the gen. If someone probate the gen then they visit the gen. If someone is loveless and uncreative then they like the quintin. If the gen is uncreative and the gen probate the stafford then the gen foist the stafford. The quintin criminate the stafford.", "logic": "\nUncreative(stafford)\nVicennial(stafford)\nFoist(stafford, gen)\nCriminate(stafford, quintin)\nUncreative(gen)\nPhlegmy(gen)\nVicennial(gen)\nFoist(gen, stafford)\nProbate(gen, stafford)\nProbate(gen, quintin)\nCriminate(gen, stafford)\nCriminate(gen, quintin)\nUnequaled(quintin)\nUncreative(quintin)\nPhlegmy(quintin)\nFoist(quintin, stafford)\nforall x (Criminate(x, quintin) -> Probate(quintin, gen))\nforall x (Uncreative(x) and Unequaled(x) -> Criminate(x, stafford))\nforall x (Criminate(x, gen) -> Foist(x, gen))\nforall x (Probate(x, gen) -> Criminate(x, gen))\nforall x (Loveless(x) and Uncreative(x) -> Foist(x, quintin))\nUncreative(gen) and Probate(gen, stafford) -> Foist(gen, stafford)\n\nCriminate(quintin, stafford)\n\nUncreative(quintin) and Unequaled(quintin) and forall x (Uncreative(x) and Unequaled(x) -> Criminate(x, stafford)) -> therefore Criminate(quintin, stafford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The townsend is septal. The townsend is copernican. The townsend decide the alfonse. The townsend sever the terri. The alfonse is septal. The alfonse is suctorial. The alfonse is copernican. The alfonse decide the townsend. The alfonse remove the townsend. The alfonse remove the terri. The alfonse sever the townsend. The alfonse sever the terri. The terri is normal. The terri is septal. The terri is suctorial. The terri decide the townsend. If someone sever the terri then the terri remove the alfonse. If someone is septal and normal then they visit the townsend. If someone sever the alfonse then they like the alfonse. If someone remove the alfonse then they visit the alfonse. If someone is hoary and septal then they like the terri. If the alfonse is septal and the alfonse remove the townsend then the alfonse decide the townsend. The terri does not visit the townsend.", "logic": "\nSeptal(townsend)\nCopernican(townsend)\nDecide(townsend, alfonse)\nSever(townsend, terri)\nSeptal(alfonse)\nSuctorial(alfonse)\nCopernican(alfonse)\nDecide(alfonse, townsend)\nRemove(alfonse, townsend)\nRemove(alfonse, terri)\nSever(alfonse, townsend)\nSever(alfonse, terri)\nNormal(terri)\nSeptal(terri)\nSuctorial(terri)\nDecide(terri, townsend)\nforall x (Sever(x, terri) -> Remove(terri, alfonse))\nforall x (Septal(x) and Normal(x) -> Sever(x, townsend))\nforall x (Sever(x, alfonse) -> Decide(x, alfonse))\nforall x (Remove(x, alfonse) -> Sever(x, alfonse))\nforall x (Hoary(x) and Septal(x) -> Decide(x, terri))\nSeptal(alfonse) and Remove(alfonse, townsend) -> Decide(alfonse, townsend)\n\nnot Sever(terri, townsend)\n\nSeptal(terri) and Normal(terri) and forall x (Septal(x) and Normal(x) -> Sever(x, townsend)) -> therefore Sever(terri, townsend)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The ioana is pressed. The ioana is barefoot. The ioana brief the tessi. The ioana mismate the aprilette. The tessi is pressed. The tessi is dozen. The tessi is barefoot. The tessi brief the ioana. The tessi span the ioana. The tessi span the aprilette. The tessi mismate the ioana. The tessi mismate the aprilette. The aprilette is slicked. The aprilette is pressed. The aprilette is dozen. The aprilette brief the ioana. If someone mismate the aprilette then the aprilette span the tessi. If someone is pressed and slicked then they visit the ioana. If someone mismate the tessi then they like the tessi. If someone span the tessi then they visit the tessi. If someone is hysterical and pressed then they like the aprilette. If the tessi is pressed and the tessi span the ioana then the tessi brief the ioana. The aprilette mismate the tessi.", "logic": "\nPressed(ioana)\nBarefoot(ioana)\nBrief(ioana, tessi)\nMismate(ioana, aprilette)\nPressed(tessi)\nDozen(tessi)\nBarefoot(tessi)\nBrief(tessi, ioana)\nSpan(tessi, ioana)\nSpan(tessi, aprilette)\nMismate(tessi, ioana)\nMismate(tessi, aprilette)\nSlicked(aprilette)\nPressed(aprilette)\nDozen(aprilette)\nBrief(aprilette, ioana)\nforall x (Mismate(x, aprilette) -> Span(aprilette, tessi))\nforall x (Pressed(x) and Slicked(x) -> Mismate(x, ioana))\nforall x (Mismate(x, tessi) -> Brief(x, tessi))\nforall x (Span(x, tessi) -> Mismate(x, tessi))\nforall x (Hysterical(x) and Pressed(x) -> Brief(x, aprilette))\nPressed(tessi) and Span(tessi, ioana) -> Brief(tessi, ioana)\n\nMismate(aprilette, tessi)\n\nMismate(tessi, aprilette) and forall x (Mismate(x, aprilette) -> Span(aprilette, tessi)) -> therefore Span(aprilette, tessi) Span(aprilette, tessi) and forall x (Span(x, tessi) -> Mismate(x, tessi)) -> therefore Mismate(aprilette, tessi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The ajai is limbed. The ajai is born. The ajai wreak the kakalina. The ajai minimise the tanny. The kakalina is limbed. The kakalina is assisted. The kakalina is born. The kakalina wreak the ajai. The kakalina expedite the ajai. The kakalina expedite the tanny. The kakalina minimise the ajai. The kakalina minimise the tanny. The tanny is unsexy. The tanny is limbed. The tanny is assisted. The tanny wreak the ajai. If someone minimise the tanny then the tanny expedite the kakalina. If someone is limbed and unsexy then they visit the ajai. If someone minimise the kakalina then they like the kakalina. If someone expedite the kakalina then they visit the kakalina. If someone is thieving and limbed then they like the tanny. If the kakalina is limbed and the kakalina expedite the ajai then the kakalina wreak the ajai. The tanny does not visit the kakalina.", "logic": "\nLimbed(ajai)\nBorn(ajai)\nWreak(ajai, kakalina)\nMinimise(ajai, tanny)\nLimbed(kakalina)\nAssisted(kakalina)\nBorn(kakalina)\nWreak(kakalina, ajai)\nExpedite(kakalina, ajai)\nExpedite(kakalina, tanny)\nMinimise(kakalina, ajai)\nMinimise(kakalina, tanny)\nUnsexy(tanny)\nLimbed(tanny)\nAssisted(tanny)\nWreak(tanny, ajai)\nforall x (Minimise(x, tanny) -> Expedite(tanny, kakalina))\nforall x (Limbed(x) and Unsexy(x) -> Minimise(x, ajai))\nforall x (Minimise(x, kakalina) -> Wreak(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Expedite(x, kakalina) -> Minimise(x, kakalina))\nforall x (Thieving(x) and Limbed(x) -> Wreak(x, tanny))\nLimbed(kakalina) and Expedite(kakalina, ajai) -> Wreak(kakalina, ajai)\n\nnot Minimise(tanny, kakalina)\n\nMinimise(kakalina, tanny) and forall x (Minimise(x, tanny) -> Expedite(tanny, kakalina)) -> therefore Expedite(tanny, kakalina) Expedite(tanny, kakalina) and forall x (Expedite(x, kakalina) -> Minimise(x, kakalina)) -> therefore Minimise(tanny, kakalina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The isidore is lucent. The isidore is inshore. The isidore furcate the osmond. The isidore gazette the tamera. The osmond is lucent. The osmond is billiard. The osmond is inshore. The osmond furcate the isidore. The osmond stage the isidore. The osmond stage the tamera. The osmond gazette the isidore. The osmond gazette the tamera. The tamera is sinitic. The tamera is lucent. The tamera is billiard. The tamera furcate the isidore. If someone gazette the tamera then the tamera stage the osmond. If someone is lucent and sinitic then they visit the isidore. If someone gazette the osmond then they like the osmond. If someone stage the osmond then they visit the osmond. If someone is leadless and lucent then they like the tamera. If the osmond is lucent and the osmond stage the isidore then the osmond furcate the isidore. The tamera furcate the osmond.", "logic": "\nLucent(isidore)\nInshore(isidore)\nFurcate(isidore, osmond)\nGazette(isidore, tamera)\nLucent(osmond)\nBilliard(osmond)\nInshore(osmond)\nFurcate(osmond, isidore)\nStage(osmond, isidore)\nStage(osmond, tamera)\nGazette(osmond, isidore)\nGazette(osmond, tamera)\nSinitic(tamera)\nLucent(tamera)\nBilliard(tamera)\nFurcate(tamera, isidore)\nforall x (Gazette(x, tamera) -> Stage(tamera, osmond))\nforall x (Lucent(x) and Sinitic(x) -> Gazette(x, isidore))\nforall x (Gazette(x, osmond) -> Furcate(x, osmond))\nforall x (Stage(x, osmond) -> Gazette(x, osmond))\nforall x (Leadless(x) and Lucent(x) -> Furcate(x, tamera))\nLucent(osmond) and Stage(osmond, isidore) -> Furcate(osmond, isidore)\n\nFurcate(tamera, osmond)\n\nGazette(osmond, tamera) and forall x (Gazette(x, tamera) -> Stage(tamera, osmond)) -> therefore Stage(tamera, osmond) Stage(tamera, osmond) and forall x (Stage(x, osmond) -> Gazette(x, osmond)) -> therefore Gazette(tamera, osmond) Gazette(tamera, osmond) and forall x (Gazette(x, osmond) -> Furcate(x, osmond)) -> therefore Furcate(tamera, osmond)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The judye is crinoid. The judye is anodyne. The judye spiritize the krystyna. The judye gestate the flint. The krystyna is crinoid. The krystyna is extensive. The krystyna is anodyne. The krystyna spiritize the judye. The krystyna alkalize the judye. The krystyna alkalize the flint. The krystyna gestate the judye. The krystyna gestate the flint. The flint is acinose. The flint is crinoid. The flint is extensive. The flint spiritize the judye. If someone gestate the flint then the flint alkalize the krystyna. If someone is crinoid and acinose then they visit the judye. If someone gestate the krystyna then they like the krystyna. If someone alkalize the krystyna then they visit the krystyna. If someone is supposable and crinoid then they like the flint. If the krystyna is crinoid and the krystyna alkalize the judye then the krystyna spiritize the judye. The flint does not like the krystyna.", "logic": "\nCrinoid(judye)\nAnodyne(judye)\nSpiritize(judye, krystyna)\nGestate(judye, flint)\nCrinoid(krystyna)\nExtensive(krystyna)\nAnodyne(krystyna)\nSpiritize(krystyna, judye)\nAlkalize(krystyna, judye)\nAlkalize(krystyna, flint)\nGestate(krystyna, judye)\nGestate(krystyna, flint)\nAcinose(flint)\nCrinoid(flint)\nExtensive(flint)\nSpiritize(flint, judye)\nforall x (Gestate(x, flint) -> Alkalize(flint, krystyna))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) and Acinose(x) -> Gestate(x, judye))\nforall x (Gestate(x, krystyna) -> Spiritize(x, krystyna))\nforall x (Alkalize(x, krystyna) -> Gestate(x, krystyna))\nforall x (Supposable(x) and Crinoid(x) -> Spiritize(x, flint))\nCrinoid(krystyna) and Alkalize(krystyna, judye) -> Spiritize(krystyna, judye)\n\nnot Spiritize(flint, krystyna)\n\nGestate(krystyna, flint) and forall x (Gestate(x, flint) -> Alkalize(flint, krystyna)) -> therefore Alkalize(flint, krystyna) Alkalize(flint, krystyna) and forall x (Alkalize(x, krystyna) -> Gestate(x, krystyna)) -> therefore Gestate(flint, krystyna) Gestate(flint, krystyna) and forall x (Gestate(x, krystyna) -> Spiritize(x, krystyna)) -> therefore Spiritize(flint, krystyna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The shandie is rentable. The shandie is thankless. The shandie ditch the tedda. The shandie attempt the alane. The tedda is rentable. The tedda is boiled. The tedda is thankless. The tedda ditch the shandie. The tedda foretell the shandie. The tedda foretell the alane. The tedda attempt the shandie. The tedda attempt the alane. The alane is caramel. The alane is rentable. The alane is boiled. The alane ditch the shandie. If someone attempt the alane then the alane foretell the tedda. If someone is rentable and caramel then they visit the shandie. If someone attempt the tedda then they like the tedda. If someone foretell the tedda then they visit the tedda. If someone is austral and rentable then they like the alane. If the tedda is rentable and the tedda foretell the shandie then the tedda ditch the shandie. The shandie does not visit the tedda.", "logic": "\nRentable(shandie)\nThankless(shandie)\nDitch(shandie, tedda)\nAttempt(shandie, alane)\nRentable(tedda)\nBoiled(tedda)\nThankless(tedda)\nDitch(tedda, shandie)\nForetell(tedda, shandie)\nForetell(tedda, alane)\nAttempt(tedda, shandie)\nAttempt(tedda, alane)\nCaramel(alane)\nRentable(alane)\nBoiled(alane)\nDitch(alane, shandie)\nforall x (Attempt(x, alane) -> Foretell(alane, tedda))\nforall x (Rentable(x) and Caramel(x) -> Attempt(x, shandie))\nforall x (Attempt(x, tedda) -> Ditch(x, tedda))\nforall x (Foretell(x, tedda) -> Attempt(x, tedda))\nforall x (Austral(x) and Rentable(x) -> Ditch(x, alane))\nRentable(tedda) and Foretell(tedda, shandie) -> Ditch(tedda, shandie)\n\nnot Attempt(shandie, tedda)\n\nforall x (Foretell(x, tedda) -> Attempt(x, tedda)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The gerianna is enduring. The gerianna is obliterate. The gerianna commove the rycca. The gerianna balloon the ursa. The rycca is enduring. The rycca is stifling. The rycca is obliterate. The rycca commove the gerianna. The rycca draft the gerianna. The rycca draft the ursa. The rycca balloon the gerianna. The rycca balloon the ursa. The ursa is tutelar. The ursa is enduring. The ursa is stifling. The ursa commove the gerianna. If someone balloon the ursa then the ursa draft the rycca. If someone is enduring and tutelar then they visit the gerianna. If someone balloon the rycca then they like the rycca. If someone draft the rycca then they visit the rycca. If someone is unattached and enduring then they like the ursa. If the rycca is enduring and the rycca draft the gerianna then the rycca commove the gerianna. The ursa commove the ursa.", "logic": "\nEnduring(gerianna)\nObliterate(gerianna)\nCommove(gerianna, rycca)\nBalloon(gerianna, ursa)\nEnduring(rycca)\nStifling(rycca)\nObliterate(rycca)\nCommove(rycca, gerianna)\nDraft(rycca, gerianna)\nDraft(rycca, ursa)\nBalloon(rycca, gerianna)\nBalloon(rycca, ursa)\nTutelar(ursa)\nEnduring(ursa)\nStifling(ursa)\nCommove(ursa, gerianna)\nforall x (Balloon(x, ursa) -> Draft(ursa, rycca))\nforall x (Enduring(x) and Tutelar(x) -> Balloon(x, gerianna))\nforall x (Balloon(x, rycca) -> Commove(x, rycca))\nforall x (Draft(x, rycca) -> Balloon(x, rycca))\nforall x (Unattached(x) and Enduring(x) -> Commove(x, ursa))\nEnduring(rycca) and Draft(rycca, gerianna) -> Commove(rycca, gerianna)\n\nCommove(ursa, ursa)\n\nforall x (Unattached(x) and Enduring(x) -> Commove(x, ursa)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The che is unedifying. The che is mature. The che conge the benni. The che delegate the zerk. The benni is unedifying. The benni is parvenu. The benni is mature. The benni conge the che. The benni disenable the che. The benni disenable the zerk. The benni delegate the che. The benni delegate the zerk. The zerk is unassured. The zerk is unedifying. The zerk is parvenu. The zerk conge the che. If someone delegate the zerk then the zerk disenable the benni. If someone is unedifying and unassured then they visit the che. If someone delegate the benni then they like the benni. If someone disenable the benni then they visit the benni. If someone is stung and unedifying then they like the zerk. If the benni is unedifying and the benni disenable the che then the benni conge the che. The che does not visit the che.", "logic": "\nUnedifying(che)\nMature(che)\nConge(che, benni)\nDelegate(che, zerk)\nUnedifying(benni)\nParvenu(benni)\nMature(benni)\nConge(benni, che)\nDisenable(benni, che)\nDisenable(benni, zerk)\nDelegate(benni, che)\nDelegate(benni, zerk)\nUnassured(zerk)\nUnedifying(zerk)\nParvenu(zerk)\nConge(zerk, che)\nforall x (Delegate(x, zerk) -> Disenable(zerk, benni))\nforall x (Unedifying(x) and Unassured(x) -> Delegate(x, che))\nforall x (Delegate(x, benni) -> Conge(x, benni))\nforall x (Disenable(x, benni) -> Delegate(x, benni))\nforall x (Stung(x) and Unedifying(x) -> Conge(x, zerk))\nUnedifying(benni) and Disenable(benni, che) -> Conge(benni, che)\n\nnot Delegate(che, che)\n\nforall x (Unedifying(x) and Unassured(x) -> Delegate(x, che)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The candis is diaphyseal. The candis is modified. The candis declutch the inglebert. The candis chevvy the jamey. The inglebert is diaphyseal. The inglebert is uveal. The inglebert is modified. The inglebert declutch the candis. The inglebert refrain the candis. The inglebert refrain the jamey. The inglebert chevvy the candis. The inglebert chevvy the jamey. The jamey is nonviolent. The jamey is diaphyseal. The jamey is uveal. The jamey declutch the candis. If someone chevvy the jamey then the jamey refrain the inglebert. If someone is diaphyseal and nonviolent then they visit the candis. If someone chevvy the inglebert then they like the inglebert. If someone refrain the inglebert then they visit the inglebert. If someone is odourless and diaphyseal then they like the jamey. If the inglebert is diaphyseal and the inglebert refrain the candis then the inglebert declutch the candis. The inglebert chevvy the inglebert.", "logic": "\nDiaphyseal(candis)\nModified(candis)\nDeclutch(candis, inglebert)\nChevvy(candis, jamey)\nDiaphyseal(inglebert)\nUveal(inglebert)\nModified(inglebert)\nDeclutch(inglebert, candis)\nRefrain(inglebert, candis)\nRefrain(inglebert, jamey)\nChevvy(inglebert, candis)\nChevvy(inglebert, jamey)\nNonviolent(jamey)\nDiaphyseal(jamey)\nUveal(jamey)\nDeclutch(jamey, candis)\nforall x (Chevvy(x, jamey) -> Refrain(jamey, inglebert))\nforall x (Diaphyseal(x) and Nonviolent(x) -> Chevvy(x, candis))\nforall x (Chevvy(x, inglebert) -> Declutch(x, inglebert))\nforall x (Refrain(x, inglebert) -> Chevvy(x, inglebert))\nforall x (Odourless(x) and Diaphyseal(x) -> Declutch(x, jamey))\nDiaphyseal(inglebert) and Refrain(inglebert, candis) -> Declutch(inglebert, candis)\n\nChevvy(inglebert, inglebert)\n\nforall x (Refrain(x, inglebert) -> Chevvy(x, inglebert)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The phylys is myopathic. The phylys is catabolic. The phylys menstruate the odie. The phylys underpin the cal. The odie is myopathic. The odie is maniclike. The odie is catabolic. The odie menstruate the phylys. The odie lollygag the phylys. The odie lollygag the cal. The odie underpin the phylys. The odie underpin the cal. The cal is elflike. The cal is myopathic. The cal is maniclike. The cal menstruate the phylys. If someone underpin the cal then the cal lollygag the odie. If someone is myopathic and elflike then they visit the phylys. If someone underpin the odie then they like the odie. If someone lollygag the odie then they visit the odie. If someone is monumental and myopathic then they like the cal. If the odie is myopathic and the odie lollygag the phylys then the odie menstruate the phylys. The phylys does not like the phylys.", "logic": "\nMyopathic(phylys)\nCatabolic(phylys)\nMenstruate(phylys, odie)\nUnderpin(phylys, cal)\nMyopathic(odie)\nManiclike(odie)\nCatabolic(odie)\nMenstruate(odie, phylys)\nLollygag(odie, phylys)\nLollygag(odie, cal)\nUnderpin(odie, phylys)\nUnderpin(odie, cal)\nElflike(cal)\nMyopathic(cal)\nManiclike(cal)\nMenstruate(cal, phylys)\nforall x (Underpin(x, cal) -> Lollygag(cal, odie))\nforall x (Myopathic(x) and Elflike(x) -> Underpin(x, phylys))\nforall x (Underpin(x, odie) -> Menstruate(x, odie))\nforall x (Lollygag(x, odie) -> Underpin(x, odie))\nforall x (Monumental(x) and Myopathic(x) -> Menstruate(x, cal))\nMyopathic(odie) and Lollygag(odie, phylys) -> Menstruate(odie, phylys)\n\nnot Menstruate(phylys, phylys)\n\nnot Menstruate(phylys, phylys) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The pearline is anomalous. The pearline is custom. The pearline prop the stepha. The pearline orate the torrence. The stepha is anomalous. The stepha is antique. The stepha is custom. The stepha prop the pearline. The stepha canalise the pearline. The stepha canalise the torrence. The stepha orate the pearline. The stepha orate the torrence. The torrence is honduran. The torrence is anomalous. The torrence is antique. The torrence prop the pearline. If someone orate the torrence then the torrence canalise the stepha. If someone is anomalous and honduran then they visit the pearline. If someone orate the stepha then they like the stepha. If someone canalise the stepha then they visit the stepha. If someone is cyclonic and anomalous then they like the torrence. If the stepha is anomalous and the stepha canalise the pearline then the stepha prop the pearline. The pearline canalise the pearline.", "logic": "\nAnomalous(pearline)\nCustom(pearline)\nProp(pearline, stepha)\nOrate(pearline, torrence)\nAnomalous(stepha)\nAntique(stepha)\nCustom(stepha)\nProp(stepha, pearline)\nCanalise(stepha, pearline)\nCanalise(stepha, torrence)\nOrate(stepha, pearline)\nOrate(stepha, torrence)\nHonduran(torrence)\nAnomalous(torrence)\nAntique(torrence)\nProp(torrence, pearline)\nforall x (Orate(x, torrence) -> Canalise(torrence, stepha))\nforall x (Anomalous(x) and Honduran(x) -> Orate(x, pearline))\nforall x (Orate(x, stepha) -> Prop(x, stepha))\nforall x (Canalise(x, stepha) -> Orate(x, stepha))\nforall x (Cyclonic(x) and Anomalous(x) -> Prop(x, torrence))\nAnomalous(stepha) and Canalise(stepha, pearline) -> Prop(stepha, pearline)\n\nCanalise(pearline, pearline)\n\nCanalise(pearline, pearline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The giralda is bizonal. The giralda is unflurried. The giralda derate the sande. The giralda ding the joyce. The sande is bizonal. The sande is infallible. The sande is unflurried. The sande derate the giralda. The sande apotheose the giralda. The sande apotheose the joyce. The sande ding the giralda. The sande ding the joyce. The joyce is jolly. The joyce is bizonal. The joyce is infallible. The joyce derate the giralda. If someone ding the joyce then the joyce apotheose the sande. If someone is bizonal and jolly then they visit the giralda. If someone ding the sande then they like the sande. If someone apotheose the sande then they visit the sande. If someone is unwilling and bizonal then they like the joyce. If the sande is bizonal and the sande apotheose the giralda then the sande derate the giralda. The joyce does not need the joyce.", "logic": "\nBizonal(giralda)\nUnflurried(giralda)\nDerate(giralda, sande)\nDing(giralda, joyce)\nBizonal(sande)\nInfallible(sande)\nUnflurried(sande)\nDerate(sande, giralda)\nApotheose(sande, giralda)\nApotheose(sande, joyce)\nDing(sande, giralda)\nDing(sande, joyce)\nJolly(joyce)\nBizonal(joyce)\nInfallible(joyce)\nDerate(joyce, giralda)\nforall x (Ding(x, joyce) -> Apotheose(joyce, sande))\nforall x (Bizonal(x) and Jolly(x) -> Ding(x, giralda))\nforall x (Ding(x, sande) -> Derate(x, sande))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, sande) -> Ding(x, sande))\nforall x (Unwilling(x) and Bizonal(x) -> Derate(x, joyce))\nBizonal(sande) and Apotheose(sande, giralda) -> Derate(sande, giralda)\n\nnot Apotheose(joyce, joyce)\n\nnot Apotheose(joyce, joyce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The jeremias is moony. The jeremias is wholesome. The jeremias eyeball the rosabel. The jeremias subvention the lorrin. The rosabel is moony. The rosabel is palmar. The rosabel is wholesome. The rosabel eyeball the jeremias. The rosabel splatter the jeremias. The rosabel splatter the lorrin. The rosabel subvention the jeremias. The rosabel subvention the lorrin. The lorrin is doleful. The lorrin is moony. The lorrin is palmar. The lorrin eyeball the jeremias. If someone subvention the lorrin then the lorrin splatter the rosabel. If someone is moony and doleful then they visit the jeremias. If someone subvention the rosabel then they like the rosabel. If someone splatter the rosabel then they visit the rosabel. If someone is castled and moony then they like the lorrin. If the rosabel is moony and the rosabel splatter the jeremias then the rosabel eyeball the jeremias. The jeremias is castled.", "logic": "\nMoony(jeremias)\nWholesome(jeremias)\nEyeball(jeremias, rosabel)\nSubvention(jeremias, lorrin)\nMoony(rosabel)\nPalmar(rosabel)\nWholesome(rosabel)\nEyeball(rosabel, jeremias)\nSplatter(rosabel, jeremias)\nSplatter(rosabel, lorrin)\nSubvention(rosabel, jeremias)\nSubvention(rosabel, lorrin)\nDoleful(lorrin)\nMoony(lorrin)\nPalmar(lorrin)\nEyeball(lorrin, jeremias)\nforall x (Subvention(x, lorrin) -> Splatter(lorrin, rosabel))\nforall x (Moony(x) and Doleful(x) -> Subvention(x, jeremias))\nforall x (Subvention(x, rosabel) -> Eyeball(x, rosabel))\nforall x (Splatter(x, rosabel) -> Subvention(x, rosabel))\nforall x (Castled(x) and Moony(x) -> Eyeball(x, lorrin))\nMoony(rosabel) and Splatter(rosabel, jeremias) -> Eyeball(rosabel, jeremias)\n\nCastled(jeremias)\n\nCastled(jeremias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-80"} {"premises": "The othella cheer the lillis. The lillis cheer the alfonzo. The skipper rootle the lillis. The alfonzo cheer the skipper. If someone deign the lillis and the lillis is unimproved then they eat the alfonzo. All bulgarian people are carbonyl. If someone cheer the skipper then they eat the othella. If someone is oscine and they like the lillis then the lillis deign the othella. If someone rootle the othella then they are bulgarian. Green people are carbonyl. The skipper rootle the lillis.", "logic": "\nCheer(othella, lillis)\nCheer(lillis, alfonzo)\nRootle(skipper, lillis)\nCheer(alfonzo, skipper)\nforall x (Deign(x, lillis) and Unimproved(lillis) -> Rootle(x, alfonzo))\nforall x (Bulgarian(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\nforall x (Cheer(x, skipper) -> Rootle(x, othella))\nforall x (Oscine(x) and Deign(x, lillis) -> Deign(lillis, othella))\nforall x (Rootle(x, othella) -> Bulgarian(x))\nforall x (Oscine(x) -> Carbonyl(x))\n\nRootle(skipper, lillis)\n\ntherefore Rootle(skipper, lillis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The garwood baronetize the aldrich. The aldrich baronetize the kylen. The pansie billet the aldrich. The kylen baronetize the pansie. If someone refurnish the aldrich and the aldrich is miniscule then they eat the kylen. All singable people are preserved. If someone baronetize the pansie then they eat the garwood. If someone is exposed and they like the aldrich then the aldrich refurnish the garwood. If someone billet the garwood then they are singable. Green people are preserved. The aldrich does not need the kylen.", "logic": "\nBaronetize(garwood, aldrich)\nBaronetize(aldrich, kylen)\nBillet(pansie, aldrich)\nBaronetize(kylen, pansie)\nforall x (Refurnish(x, aldrich) and Miniscule(aldrich) -> Billet(x, kylen))\nforall x (Singable(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Baronetize(x, pansie) -> Billet(x, garwood))\nforall x (Exposed(x) and Refurnish(x, aldrich) -> Refurnish(aldrich, garwood))\nforall x (Billet(x, garwood) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Exposed(x) -> Preserved(x))\n\nnot Baronetize(aldrich, kylen)\n\ntherefore Baronetize(aldrich, kylen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The berni faggot the andee. The andee faggot the charissa. The catlaina fare the andee. The charissa faggot the catlaina. If someone carburise the andee and the andee is chic then they eat the charissa. All achromic people are cinerary. If someone faggot the catlaina then they eat the berni. If someone is taken and they like the andee then the andee carburise the berni. If someone fare the berni then they are achromic. Green people are cinerary. The charissa fare the berni.", "logic": "\nFaggot(berni, andee)\nFaggot(andee, charissa)\nFare(catlaina, andee)\nFaggot(charissa, catlaina)\nforall x (Carburise(x, andee) and Chic(andee) -> Fare(x, charissa))\nforall x (Achromic(x) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Faggot(x, catlaina) -> Fare(x, berni))\nforall x (Taken(x) and Carburise(x, andee) -> Carburise(andee, berni))\nforall x (Fare(x, berni) -> Achromic(x))\nforall x (Taken(x) -> Cinerary(x))\n\nFare(charissa, berni)\n\nFaggot(charissa, catlaina) and forall x (Faggot(x, catlaina) -> Fare(x, berni)) -> therefore Fare(charissa, berni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The mikael blackguard the solly. The solly blackguard the ric. The daloris spend the solly. The ric blackguard the daloris. If someone drop the solly and the solly is landscaped then they eat the ric. All abasic people are unaffected. If someone blackguard the daloris then they eat the mikael. If someone is jocose and they like the solly then the solly drop the mikael. If someone spend the mikael then they are abasic. Green people are unaffected. The ric does not eat the mikael.", "logic": "\nBlackguard(mikael, solly)\nBlackguard(solly, ric)\nSpend(daloris, solly)\nBlackguard(ric, daloris)\nforall x (Drop(x, solly) and Landscaped(solly) -> Spend(x, ric))\nforall x (Abasic(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nforall x (Blackguard(x, daloris) -> Spend(x, mikael))\nforall x (Jocose(x) and Drop(x, solly) -> Drop(solly, mikael))\nforall x (Spend(x, mikael) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Unaffected(x))\n\nnot Spend(ric, mikael)\n\nBlackguard(ric, daloris) and forall x (Blackguard(x, daloris) -> Spend(x, mikael)) -> therefore Spend(ric, mikael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The joana booze the julina. The julina booze the torry. The harlie slip the julina. The torry booze the harlie. If someone unhand the julina and the julina is disyllabic then they eat the torry. All bolivian people are oaten. If someone booze the harlie then they eat the joana. If someone is unlikely and they like the julina then the julina unhand the joana. If someone slip the joana then they are bolivian. Green people are oaten. The torry is bolivian.", "logic": "\nBooze(joana, julina)\nBooze(julina, torry)\nSlip(harlie, julina)\nBooze(torry, harlie)\nforall x (Unhand(x, julina) and Disyllabic(julina) -> Slip(x, torry))\nforall x (Bolivian(x) -> Oaten(x))\nforall x (Booze(x, harlie) -> Slip(x, joana))\nforall x (Unlikely(x) and Unhand(x, julina) -> Unhand(julina, joana))\nforall x (Slip(x, joana) -> Bolivian(x))\nforall x (Unlikely(x) -> Oaten(x))\n\nBolivian(torry)\n\nBooze(torry, harlie) and forall x (Booze(x, harlie) -> Slip(x, joana)) -> therefore Slip(torry, joana) Slip(torry, joana) and forall x (Slip(x, joana) -> Bolivian(x)) -> therefore Bolivian(torry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The min heed the rodrick. The rodrick heed the cordie. The moe bankrupt the rodrick. The cordie heed the moe. If someone suture the rodrick and the rodrick is acetylic then they eat the cordie. All imprecise people are humorous. If someone heed the moe then they eat the min. If someone is uxorious and they like the rodrick then the rodrick suture the min. If someone bankrupt the min then they are imprecise. Green people are humorous. The cordie is not imprecise.", "logic": "\nHeed(min, rodrick)\nHeed(rodrick, cordie)\nBankrupt(moe, rodrick)\nHeed(cordie, moe)\nforall x (Suture(x, rodrick) and Acetylic(rodrick) -> Bankrupt(x, cordie))\nforall x (Imprecise(x) -> Humorous(x))\nforall x (Heed(x, moe) -> Bankrupt(x, min))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) and Suture(x, rodrick) -> Suture(rodrick, min))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, min) -> Imprecise(x))\nforall x (Uxorious(x) -> Humorous(x))\n\nnot Imprecise(cordie)\n\nHeed(cordie, moe) and forall x (Heed(x, moe) -> Bankrupt(x, min)) -> therefore Bankrupt(cordie, min) Bankrupt(cordie, min) and forall x (Bankrupt(x, min) -> Imprecise(x)) -> therefore Imprecise(cordie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The zena decouple the yolane. The yolane decouple the elroy. The seamus manicure the yolane. The elroy decouple the seamus. If someone harbor the yolane and the yolane is adjective then they eat the elroy. All torpid people are grouchy. If someone decouple the seamus then they eat the zena. If someone is costive and they like the yolane then the yolane harbor the zena. If someone manicure the zena then they are torpid. Green people are grouchy. The elroy is grouchy.", "logic": "\nDecouple(zena, yolane)\nDecouple(yolane, elroy)\nManicure(seamus, yolane)\nDecouple(elroy, seamus)\nforall x (Harbor(x, yolane) and Adjective(yolane) -> Manicure(x, elroy))\nforall x (Torpid(x) -> Grouchy(x))\nforall x (Decouple(x, seamus) -> Manicure(x, zena))\nforall x (Costive(x) and Harbor(x, yolane) -> Harbor(yolane, zena))\nforall x (Manicure(x, zena) -> Torpid(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Grouchy(x))\n\nGrouchy(elroy)\n\nDecouple(elroy, seamus) and forall x (Decouple(x, seamus) -> Manicure(x, zena)) -> therefore Manicure(elroy, zena) Manicure(elroy, zena) and forall x (Manicure(x, zena) -> Torpid(x)) -> therefore Torpid(elroy) Torpid(elroy) and forall x (Torpid(x) -> Grouchy(x)) -> therefore Grouchy(elroy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The jeannette corner the oralle. The oralle corner the robyn. The kinna underpin the oralle. The robyn corner the kinna. If someone snowball the oralle and the oralle is amoristic then they eat the robyn. All expectant people are chirpy. If someone corner the kinna then they eat the jeannette. If someone is skeletal and they like the oralle then the oralle snowball the jeannette. If someone underpin the jeannette then they are expectant. Green people are chirpy. The robyn is not chirpy.", "logic": "\nCorner(jeannette, oralle)\nCorner(oralle, robyn)\nUnderpin(kinna, oralle)\nCorner(robyn, kinna)\nforall x (Snowball(x, oralle) and Amoristic(oralle) -> Underpin(x, robyn))\nforall x (Expectant(x) -> Chirpy(x))\nforall x (Corner(x, kinna) -> Underpin(x, jeannette))\nforall x (Skeletal(x) and Snowball(x, oralle) -> Snowball(oralle, jeannette))\nforall x (Underpin(x, jeannette) -> Expectant(x))\nforall x (Skeletal(x) -> Chirpy(x))\n\nnot Chirpy(robyn)\n\nCorner(robyn, kinna) and forall x (Corner(x, kinna) -> Underpin(x, jeannette)) -> therefore Underpin(robyn, jeannette) Underpin(robyn, jeannette) and forall x (Underpin(x, jeannette) -> Expectant(x)) -> therefore Expectant(robyn) Expectant(robyn) and forall x (Expectant(x) -> Chirpy(x)) -> therefore Chirpy(robyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The norrie quail the agretha. The agretha quail the miquela. The barbe chelate the agretha. The miquela quail the barbe. If someone code the agretha and the agretha is periodic then they eat the miquela. All seamy people are libidinous. If someone quail the barbe then they eat the norrie. If someone is extradural and they like the agretha then the agretha code the norrie. If someone chelate the norrie then they are seamy. Green people are libidinous. The norrie is not libidinous.", "logic": "\nQuail(norrie, agretha)\nQuail(agretha, miquela)\nChelate(barbe, agretha)\nQuail(miquela, barbe)\nforall x (Code(x, agretha) and Periodic(agretha) -> Chelate(x, miquela))\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> Libidinous(x))\nforall x (Quail(x, barbe) -> Chelate(x, norrie))\nforall x (Extradural(x) and Code(x, agretha) -> Code(agretha, norrie))\nforall x (Chelate(x, norrie) -> Seamy(x))\nforall x (Extradural(x) -> Libidinous(x))\n\nnot Libidinous(norrie)\n\nforall x (Seamy(x) -> Libidinous(x)) <- forall x (Chelate(x, norrie) -> Seamy(x)) <- forall x (Quail(x, barbe) -> Chelate(x, norrie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The peri disunify the kingsley. The kingsley disunify the dorena. The valina bootlick the kingsley. The dorena disunify the valina. If someone consociate the kingsley and the kingsley is staminate then they eat the dorena. All unchewable people are scholastic. If someone disunify the valina then they eat the peri. If someone is musky and they like the kingsley then the kingsley consociate the peri. If someone bootlick the peri then they are unchewable. Green people are scholastic. The valina bootlick the peri.", "logic": "\nDisunify(peri, kingsley)\nDisunify(kingsley, dorena)\nBootlick(valina, kingsley)\nDisunify(dorena, valina)\nforall x (Consociate(x, kingsley) and Staminate(kingsley) -> Bootlick(x, dorena))\nforall x (Unchewable(x) -> Scholastic(x))\nforall x (Disunify(x, valina) -> Bootlick(x, peri))\nforall x (Musky(x) and Consociate(x, kingsley) -> Consociate(kingsley, peri))\nforall x (Bootlick(x, peri) -> Unchewable(x))\nforall x (Musky(x) -> Scholastic(x))\n\nBootlick(valina, peri)\n\nforall x (Disunify(x, valina) -> Bootlick(x, peri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The sergent supplant the noel. The noel supplant the jay. The rosene meander the noel. The jay supplant the rosene. If someone polemize the noel and the noel is external then they eat the jay. All swingy people are vinous. If someone supplant the rosene then they eat the sergent. If someone is assignable and they like the noel then the noel polemize the sergent. If someone meander the sergent then they are swingy. Green people are vinous. The rosene is not swingy.", "logic": "\nSupplant(sergent, noel)\nSupplant(noel, jay)\nMeander(rosene, noel)\nSupplant(jay, rosene)\nforall x (Polemize(x, noel) and External(noel) -> Meander(x, jay))\nforall x (Swingy(x) -> Vinous(x))\nforall x (Supplant(x, rosene) -> Meander(x, sergent))\nforall x (Assignable(x) and Polemize(x, noel) -> Polemize(noel, sergent))\nforall x (Meander(x, sergent) -> Swingy(x))\nforall x (Assignable(x) -> Vinous(x))\n\nnot Swingy(rosene)\n\nforall x (Meander(x, sergent) -> Swingy(x)) <- forall x (Supplant(x, rosene) -> Meander(x, sergent)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The hercules adduce the werner. The werner adduce the tiana. The adriane abut the werner. The tiana adduce the adriane. If someone birdlime the werner and the werner is malayan then they eat the tiana. All abasic people are ammino. If someone adduce the adriane then they eat the hercules. If someone is scaphoid and they like the werner then the werner birdlime the hercules. If someone abut the hercules then they are abasic. Green people are ammino. The adriane abut the tiana.", "logic": "\nAdduce(hercules, werner)\nAdduce(werner, tiana)\nAbut(adriane, werner)\nAdduce(tiana, adriane)\nforall x (Birdlime(x, werner) and Malayan(werner) -> Abut(x, tiana))\nforall x (Abasic(x) -> Ammino(x))\nforall x (Adduce(x, adriane) -> Abut(x, hercules))\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) and Birdlime(x, werner) -> Birdlime(werner, hercules))\nforall x (Abut(x, hercules) -> Abasic(x))\nforall x (Scaphoid(x) -> Ammino(x))\n\nAbut(adriane, tiana)\n\nforall x (Birdlime(x, werner) and Malayan(werner) -> Abut(x, tiana)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The penelopa spelunk the kenneth. The kenneth spelunk the shurwood. The steven eroticize the kenneth. The shurwood spelunk the steven. If someone calliper the kenneth and the kenneth is acned then they eat the shurwood. All ammoniacal people are pistillate. If someone spelunk the steven then they eat the penelopa. If someone is mutinous and they like the kenneth then the kenneth calliper the penelopa. If someone eroticize the penelopa then they are ammoniacal. Green people are pistillate. The steven does not like the steven.", "logic": "\nSpelunk(penelopa, kenneth)\nSpelunk(kenneth, shurwood)\nEroticize(steven, kenneth)\nSpelunk(shurwood, steven)\nforall x (Calliper(x, kenneth) and Acned(kenneth) -> Eroticize(x, shurwood))\nforall x (Ammoniacal(x) -> Pistillate(x))\nforall x (Spelunk(x, steven) -> Eroticize(x, penelopa))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) and Calliper(x, kenneth) -> Calliper(kenneth, penelopa))\nforall x (Eroticize(x, penelopa) -> Ammoniacal(x))\nforall x (Mutinous(x) -> Pistillate(x))\n\nnot Calliper(steven, steven)\n\nnot Calliper(steven, steven) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The tobiah affront the clifton. The clifton affront the kacey. The miran moonshine the clifton. The kacey affront the miran. If someone outgeneral the clifton and the clifton is squalid then they eat the kacey. All isoclinal people are derisory. If someone affront the miran then they eat the tobiah. If someone is freakish and they like the clifton then the clifton outgeneral the tobiah. If someone moonshine the tobiah then they are isoclinal. Green people are derisory. The miran affront the kacey.", "logic": "\nAffront(tobiah, clifton)\nAffront(clifton, kacey)\nMoonshine(miran, clifton)\nAffront(kacey, miran)\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, clifton) and Squalid(clifton) -> Moonshine(x, kacey))\nforall x (Isoclinal(x) -> Derisory(x))\nforall x (Affront(x, miran) -> Moonshine(x, tobiah))\nforall x (Freakish(x) and Outgeneral(x, clifton) -> Outgeneral(clifton, tobiah))\nforall x (Moonshine(x, tobiah) -> Isoclinal(x))\nforall x (Freakish(x) -> Derisory(x))\n\nAffront(miran, kacey)\n\nAffront(miran, kacey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The antony snow the hiro. The hiro snow the dickie. The gertrud whore the hiro. The dickie snow the gertrud. If someone seem the hiro and the hiro is degressive then they eat the dickie. All lite people are irascible. If someone snow the gertrud then they eat the antony. If someone is offhand and they like the hiro then the hiro seem the antony. If someone whore the antony then they are lite. Green people are irascible. The hiro does not eat the hiro.", "logic": "\nSnow(antony, hiro)\nSnow(hiro, dickie)\nWhore(gertrud, hiro)\nSnow(dickie, gertrud)\nforall x (Seem(x, hiro) and Degressive(hiro) -> Whore(x, dickie))\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Irascible(x))\nforall x (Snow(x, gertrud) -> Whore(x, antony))\nforall x (Offhand(x) and Seem(x, hiro) -> Seem(hiro, antony))\nforall x (Whore(x, antony) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Offhand(x) -> Irascible(x))\n\nnot Whore(hiro, hiro)\n\nnot Whore(hiro, hiro) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The englebart catalyse the candice. The candice catalyse the delores. The benton crab the candice. The delores catalyse the benton. If someone ranch the candice and the candice is chthonic then they eat the delores. All marmoreal people are clausal. If someone catalyse the benton then they eat the englebart. If someone is deranged and they like the candice then the candice ranch the englebart. If someone crab the englebart then they are marmoreal. Green people are clausal. The benton crab the benton.", "logic": "\nCatalyse(englebart, candice)\nCatalyse(candice, delores)\nCrab(benton, candice)\nCatalyse(delores, benton)\nforall x (Ranch(x, candice) and Chthonic(candice) -> Crab(x, delores))\nforall x (Marmoreal(x) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Catalyse(x, benton) -> Crab(x, englebart))\nforall x (Deranged(x) and Ranch(x, candice) -> Ranch(candice, englebart))\nforall x (Crab(x, englebart) -> Marmoreal(x))\nforall x (Deranged(x) -> Clausal(x))\n\nCrab(benton, benton)\n\nCrab(benton, benton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-691"} {"premises": "The rhody spool the ranna. The bree spool the rhody. The lyndel boob the ranna. The ranna undercut the lyndel. If something undercut the bree then the bree boob the lyndel. If something undercut the bree and it boob the rhody then the rhody boob the bree. If the lyndel is amniotic then the lyndel undercut the bree. If something boob the rhody and it boob the ranna then it spool the rhody. If something spool the rhody then it spool the ranna. If the ranna spool the lyndel then the lyndel is amniotic. The bree spool the rhody.", "logic": "\nSpool(rhody, ranna)\nSpool(bree, rhody)\nBoob(lyndel, ranna)\nUndercut(ranna, lyndel)\nforall x (Undercut(x, bree) -> Boob(bree, lyndel))\nforall x (Undercut(x, bree) and Boob(x, rhody) -> Boob(rhody, bree))\nAmniotic(lyndel) -> Undercut(lyndel, bree)\nforall x (Boob(x, rhody) and Boob(x, ranna) -> Spool(x, rhody))\nforall x (Spool(x, rhody) -> Spool(x, ranna))\nSpool(ranna, lyndel) -> Amniotic(lyndel)\n\nSpool(bree, rhody)\n\ntherefore Spool(bree, rhody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4602"} {"premises": "The mareah garrote the ame. The mildred garrote the mareah. The chrissa crayon the ame. The ame write the chrissa. If something write the mildred then the mildred crayon the chrissa. If something write the mildred and it crayon the mareah then the mareah crayon the mildred. If the chrissa is homologic then the chrissa write the mildred. If something crayon the mareah and it crayon the ame then it garrote the mareah. If something garrote the mareah then it garrote the ame. If the ame garrote the chrissa then the chrissa is homologic. The ame does not need the chrissa.", "logic": "\nGarrote(mareah, ame)\nGarrote(mildred, mareah)\nCrayon(chrissa, ame)\nWrite(ame, chrissa)\nforall x (Write(x, mildred) -> Crayon(mildred, chrissa))\nforall x (Write(x, mildred) and Crayon(x, mareah) -> Crayon(mareah, mildred))\nHomologic(chrissa) -> Write(chrissa, mildred)\nforall x (Crayon(x, mareah) and Crayon(x, ame) -> Garrote(x, mareah))\nforall x (Garrote(x, mareah) -> Garrote(x, ame))\nGarrote(ame, chrissa) -> Homologic(chrissa)\n\nnot Write(ame, chrissa)\n\ntherefore Write(ame, chrissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4602"} {"premises": "The sven antique the selma. The tamma antique the sven. The phyllida angulate the selma. The selma housekeep the phyllida. If something housekeep the tamma then the tamma angulate the phyllida. If something housekeep the tamma and it angulate the sven then the sven angulate the tamma. If the phyllida is rampageous then the phyllida housekeep the tamma. If something angulate the sven and it angulate the selma then it antique the sven. If something antique the sven then it antique the selma. If the selma antique the phyllida then the phyllida is rampageous. The sven does not visit the tamma.", "logic": "\nAntique(sven, selma)\nAntique(tamma, sven)\nAngulate(phyllida, selma)\nHousekeep(selma, phyllida)\nforall x (Housekeep(x, tamma) -> Angulate(tamma, phyllida))\nforall x (Housekeep(x, tamma) and Angulate(x, sven) -> Angulate(sven, tamma))\nRampageous(phyllida) -> Housekeep(phyllida, tamma)\nforall x (Angulate(x, sven) and Angulate(x, selma) -> Antique(x, sven))\nforall x (Antique(x, sven) -> Antique(x, selma))\nAntique(selma, phyllida) -> Rampageous(phyllida)\n\nnot Angulate(sven, tamma)\n\nforall x (Housekeep(x, tamma) and Angulate(x, sven) -> Angulate(sven, tamma)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4602"} {"premises": "The skyler perfect the aviva. The koo perfect the skyler. The malcah weave the aviva. The aviva recount the malcah. If something recount the koo then the koo weave the malcah. If something recount the koo and it weave the skyler then the skyler weave the koo. If the malcah is agential then the malcah recount the koo. If something weave the skyler and it weave the aviva then it perfect the skyler. If something perfect the skyler then it perfect the aviva. If the aviva perfect the malcah then the malcah is agential. The aviva weave the malcah.", "logic": "\nPerfect(skyler, aviva)\nPerfect(koo, skyler)\nWeave(malcah, aviva)\nRecount(aviva, malcah)\nforall x (Recount(x, koo) -> Weave(koo, malcah))\nforall x (Recount(x, koo) and Weave(x, skyler) -> Weave(skyler, koo))\nAgential(malcah) -> Recount(malcah, koo)\nforall x (Weave(x, skyler) and Weave(x, aviva) -> Perfect(x, skyler))\nforall x (Perfect(x, skyler) -> Perfect(x, aviva))\nPerfect(aviva, malcah) -> Agential(malcah)\n\nWeave(aviva, malcah)\n\nWeave(aviva, malcah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4602"} {"premises": "Abra is tyrolese. Abra is tasseled. Pansie is tyrolese. Pansie is bipinnate. Pansie is not nebular. Pansie is wolfish. Heddi is not pederastic. Melonie is tyrolese. Melonie is nebular. Melonie is unbarreled. Melonie is wolfish. Melonie is tasseled. If someone is tasseled then they are pederastic. If Abra is tasseled and Abra is pederastic then Abra is wolfish. If Abra is bipinnate then Abra is wolfish. All wolfish, tyrolese people are unbarreled. If Abra is wolfish then Abra is not nebular. All tyrolese people are tasseled. Furry people are tasseled. If Melonie is tyrolese and Melonie is not wolfish then Melonie is unbarreled. Abra is tasseled.", "logic": "\nTyrolese(abra)\nTasseled(abra)\nTyrolese(pansie)\nBipinnate(pansie)\nnot Nebular(pansie)\nWolfish(pansie)\nnot Pederastic(heddi)\nTyrolese(melonie)\nNebular(melonie)\nUnbarreled(melonie)\nWolfish(melonie)\nTasseled(melonie)\nforall x (Tasseled(x) -> Pederastic(x))\nTasseled(abra) and Pederastic(abra) -> Wolfish(abra)\nBipinnate(abra) -> Wolfish(abra)\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and Tyrolese(x) -> Unbarreled(x))\nWolfish(abra) -> not Nebular(abra)\nforall x (Tyrolese(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Nebular(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nTyrolese(melonie) and not Wolfish(melonie) -> Unbarreled(melonie)\n\nTasseled(abra)\n\ntherefore Tasseled(abra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Eli is renascent. Eli is upland. Basia is renascent. Basia is screaky. Basia is not lordotic. Basia is rimeless. Adore is not actinoid. Jerzy is renascent. Jerzy is lordotic. Jerzy is haitian. Jerzy is rimeless. Jerzy is upland. If someone is upland then they are actinoid. If Eli is upland and Eli is actinoid then Eli is rimeless. If Eli is screaky then Eli is rimeless. All rimeless, renascent people are haitian. If Eli is rimeless then Eli is not lordotic. All renascent people are upland. Furry people are upland. If Jerzy is renascent and Jerzy is not rimeless then Jerzy is haitian. Eli is not renascent.", "logic": "\nRenascent(eli)\nUpland(eli)\nRenascent(basia)\nScreaky(basia)\nnot Lordotic(basia)\nRimeless(basia)\nnot Actinoid(adore)\nRenascent(jerzy)\nLordotic(jerzy)\nHaitian(jerzy)\nRimeless(jerzy)\nUpland(jerzy)\nforall x (Upland(x) -> Actinoid(x))\nUpland(eli) and Actinoid(eli) -> Rimeless(eli)\nScreaky(eli) -> Rimeless(eli)\nforall x (Rimeless(x) and Renascent(x) -> Haitian(x))\nRimeless(eli) -> not Lordotic(eli)\nforall x (Renascent(x) -> Upland(x))\nforall x (Lordotic(x) -> Upland(x))\nRenascent(jerzy) and not Rimeless(jerzy) -> Haitian(jerzy)\n\nnot Renascent(eli)\n\ntherefore Renascent(eli)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Delores is turbaned. Delores is deific. Barthel is turbaned. Barthel is ocellated. Barthel is not spurting. Barthel is insistent. Wilek is not arbitrary. Giffer is turbaned. Giffer is spurting. Giffer is euphonious. Giffer is insistent. Giffer is deific. If someone is deific then they are arbitrary. If Delores is deific and Delores is arbitrary then Delores is insistent. If Delores is ocellated then Delores is insistent. All insistent, turbaned people are euphonious. If Delores is insistent then Delores is not spurting. All turbaned people are deific. Furry people are deific. If Giffer is turbaned and Giffer is not insistent then Giffer is euphonious. Barthel is euphonious.", "logic": "\nTurbaned(delores)\nDeific(delores)\nTurbaned(barthel)\nOcellated(barthel)\nnot Spurting(barthel)\nInsistent(barthel)\nnot Arbitrary(wilek)\nTurbaned(giffer)\nSpurting(giffer)\nEuphonious(giffer)\nInsistent(giffer)\nDeific(giffer)\nforall x (Deific(x) -> Arbitrary(x))\nDeific(delores) and Arbitrary(delores) -> Insistent(delores)\nOcellated(delores) -> Insistent(delores)\nforall x (Insistent(x) and Turbaned(x) -> Euphonious(x))\nInsistent(delores) -> not Spurting(delores)\nforall x (Turbaned(x) -> Deific(x))\nforall x (Spurting(x) -> Deific(x))\nTurbaned(giffer) and not Insistent(giffer) -> Euphonious(giffer)\n\nEuphonious(barthel)\n\nInsistent(barthel) and Turbaned(barthel) and forall x (Insistent(x) and Turbaned(x) -> Euphonious(x)) -> therefore Euphonious(barthel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Chantal is bedewed. Chantal is longhand. Serge is bedewed. Serge is causal. Serge is not unplayful. Serge is abuzz. Rolf is not sheetlike. Godard is bedewed. Godard is unplayful. Godard is unoriginal. Godard is abuzz. Godard is longhand. If someone is longhand then they are sheetlike. If Chantal is longhand and Chantal is sheetlike then Chantal is abuzz. If Chantal is causal then Chantal is abuzz. All abuzz, bedewed people are unoriginal. If Chantal is abuzz then Chantal is not unplayful. All bedewed people are longhand. Furry people are longhand. If Godard is bedewed and Godard is not abuzz then Godard is unoriginal. Serge is not longhand.", "logic": "\nBedewed(chantal)\nLonghand(chantal)\nBedewed(serge)\nCausal(serge)\nnot Unplayful(serge)\nAbuzz(serge)\nnot Sheetlike(rolf)\nBedewed(godard)\nUnplayful(godard)\nUnoriginal(godard)\nAbuzz(godard)\nLonghand(godard)\nforall x (Longhand(x) -> Sheetlike(x))\nLonghand(chantal) and Sheetlike(chantal) -> Abuzz(chantal)\nCausal(chantal) -> Abuzz(chantal)\nforall x (Abuzz(x) and Bedewed(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nAbuzz(chantal) -> not Unplayful(chantal)\nforall x (Bedewed(x) -> Longhand(x))\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Longhand(x))\nBedewed(godard) and not Abuzz(godard) -> Unoriginal(godard)\n\nnot Longhand(serge)\n\nBedewed(serge) and forall x (Bedewed(x) -> Longhand(x)) -> therefore Longhand(serge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Jonathon is threescore. Jonathon is beardless. Analiese is threescore. Analiese is lacklustre. Analiese is not analgetic. Analiese is epiphytic. Rita is not mesmerized. Goldie is threescore. Goldie is analgetic. Goldie is louvered. Goldie is epiphytic. Goldie is beardless. If someone is beardless then they are mesmerized. If Jonathon is beardless and Jonathon is mesmerized then Jonathon is epiphytic. If Jonathon is lacklustre then Jonathon is epiphytic. All epiphytic, threescore people are louvered. If Jonathon is epiphytic then Jonathon is not analgetic. All threescore people are beardless. Furry people are beardless. If Goldie is threescore and Goldie is not epiphytic then Goldie is louvered. Jonathon is epiphytic.", "logic": "\nThreescore(jonathon)\nBeardless(jonathon)\nThreescore(analiese)\nLacklustre(analiese)\nnot Analgetic(analiese)\nEpiphytic(analiese)\nnot Mesmerized(rita)\nThreescore(goldie)\nAnalgetic(goldie)\nLouvered(goldie)\nEpiphytic(goldie)\nBeardless(goldie)\nforall x (Beardless(x) -> Mesmerized(x))\nBeardless(jonathon) and Mesmerized(jonathon) -> Epiphytic(jonathon)\nLacklustre(jonathon) -> Epiphytic(jonathon)\nforall x (Epiphytic(x) and Threescore(x) -> Louvered(x))\nEpiphytic(jonathon) -> not Analgetic(jonathon)\nforall x (Threescore(x) -> Beardless(x))\nforall x (Analgetic(x) -> Beardless(x))\nThreescore(goldie) and not Epiphytic(goldie) -> Louvered(goldie)\n\nEpiphytic(jonathon)\n\nBeardless(jonathon) and forall x (Beardless(x) -> Mesmerized(x)) -> therefore Mesmerized(jonathon) Beardless(jonathon) and Mesmerized(jonathon) and Beardless(jonathon) and Mesmerized(jonathon) -> Epiphytic(jonathon) -> therefore Epiphytic(jonathon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Sandro is threescore. Sandro is onymous. Rayna is threescore. Rayna is forbearing. Rayna is not kosher. Rayna is archaean. Elnora is not neither. Analise is threescore. Analise is kosher. Analise is musing. Analise is archaean. Analise is onymous. If someone is onymous then they are neither. If Sandro is onymous and Sandro is neither then Sandro is archaean. If Sandro is forbearing then Sandro is archaean. All archaean, threescore people are musing. If Sandro is archaean then Sandro is not kosher. All threescore people are onymous. Furry people are onymous. If Analise is threescore and Analise is not archaean then Analise is musing. Sandro is not archaean.", "logic": "\nThreescore(sandro)\nOnymous(sandro)\nThreescore(rayna)\nForbearing(rayna)\nnot Kosher(rayna)\nArchaean(rayna)\nnot Neither(elnora)\nThreescore(analise)\nKosher(analise)\nMusing(analise)\nArchaean(analise)\nOnymous(analise)\nforall x (Onymous(x) -> Neither(x))\nOnymous(sandro) and Neither(sandro) -> Archaean(sandro)\nForbearing(sandro) -> Archaean(sandro)\nforall x (Archaean(x) and Threescore(x) -> Musing(x))\nArchaean(sandro) -> not Kosher(sandro)\nforall x (Threescore(x) -> Onymous(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Onymous(x))\nThreescore(analise) and not Archaean(analise) -> Musing(analise)\n\nnot Archaean(sandro)\n\nOnymous(sandro) and forall x (Onymous(x) -> Neither(x)) -> therefore Neither(sandro) Onymous(sandro) and Neither(sandro) and Onymous(sandro) and Neither(sandro) -> Archaean(sandro) -> therefore Archaean(sandro)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Wilden is perinatal. Wilden is parotid. Jimbo is perinatal. Jimbo is lunar. Jimbo is not explicable. Jimbo is comatose. Morrie is not vindictive. Cyrille is perinatal. Cyrille is explicable. Cyrille is milanese. Cyrille is comatose. Cyrille is parotid. If someone is parotid then they are vindictive. If Wilden is parotid and Wilden is vindictive then Wilden is comatose. If Wilden is lunar then Wilden is comatose. All comatose, perinatal people are milanese. If Wilden is comatose then Wilden is not explicable. All perinatal people are parotid. Furry people are parotid. If Cyrille is perinatal and Cyrille is not comatose then Cyrille is milanese. Wilden is not explicable.", "logic": "\nPerinatal(wilden)\nParotid(wilden)\nPerinatal(jimbo)\nLunar(jimbo)\nnot Explicable(jimbo)\nComatose(jimbo)\nnot Vindictive(morrie)\nPerinatal(cyrille)\nExplicable(cyrille)\nMilanese(cyrille)\nComatose(cyrille)\nParotid(cyrille)\nforall x (Parotid(x) -> Vindictive(x))\nParotid(wilden) and Vindictive(wilden) -> Comatose(wilden)\nLunar(wilden) -> Comatose(wilden)\nforall x (Comatose(x) and Perinatal(x) -> Milanese(x))\nComatose(wilden) -> not Explicable(wilden)\nforall x (Perinatal(x) -> Parotid(x))\nforall x (Explicable(x) -> Parotid(x))\nPerinatal(cyrille) and not Comatose(cyrille) -> Milanese(cyrille)\n\nnot Explicable(wilden)\n\nParotid(wilden) and forall x (Parotid(x) -> Vindictive(x)) -> therefore Vindictive(wilden) Parotid(wilden) and Vindictive(wilden) and Parotid(wilden) and Vindictive(wilden) -> Comatose(wilden) -> therefore Comatose(wilden) Comatose(wilden) and Comatose(wilden) -> not Explicable(wilden) -> therefore not Explicable(wilden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Tommi is storeyed. Tommi is malayan. Tomasine is storeyed. Tomasine is unscripted. Tomasine is not irruptive. Tomasine is lopsided. Vince is not fucking. Davin is storeyed. Davin is irruptive. Davin is genetic. Davin is lopsided. Davin is malayan. If someone is malayan then they are fucking. If Tommi is malayan and Tommi is fucking then Tommi is lopsided. If Tommi is unscripted then Tommi is lopsided. All lopsided, storeyed people are genetic. If Tommi is lopsided then Tommi is not irruptive. All storeyed people are malayan. Furry people are malayan. If Davin is storeyed and Davin is not lopsided then Davin is genetic. Tommi is irruptive.", "logic": "\nStoreyed(tommi)\nMalayan(tommi)\nStoreyed(tomasine)\nUnscripted(tomasine)\nnot Irruptive(tomasine)\nLopsided(tomasine)\nnot Fucking(vince)\nStoreyed(davin)\nIrruptive(davin)\nGenetic(davin)\nLopsided(davin)\nMalayan(davin)\nforall x (Malayan(x) -> Fucking(x))\nMalayan(tommi) and Fucking(tommi) -> Lopsided(tommi)\nUnscripted(tommi) -> Lopsided(tommi)\nforall x (Lopsided(x) and Storeyed(x) -> Genetic(x))\nLopsided(tommi) -> not Irruptive(tommi)\nforall x (Storeyed(x) -> Malayan(x))\nforall x (Irruptive(x) -> Malayan(x))\nStoreyed(davin) and not Lopsided(davin) -> Genetic(davin)\n\nIrruptive(tommi)\n\nMalayan(tommi) and forall x (Malayan(x) -> Fucking(x)) -> therefore Fucking(tommi) Malayan(tommi) and Fucking(tommi) and Malayan(tommi) and Fucking(tommi) -> Lopsided(tommi) -> therefore Lopsided(tommi) Lopsided(tommi) and Lopsided(tommi) -> not Irruptive(tommi) -> therefore not Irruptive(tommi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Bobinette is caesural. Bobinette is commodious. Lolande is caesural. Lolande is hypertonic. Lolande is not antibiotic. Lolande is lustrous. Veronike is not stray. Georg is caesural. Georg is antibiotic. Georg is humourless. Georg is lustrous. Georg is commodious. If someone is commodious then they are stray. If Bobinette is commodious and Bobinette is stray then Bobinette is lustrous. If Bobinette is hypertonic then Bobinette is lustrous. All lustrous, caesural people are humourless. If Bobinette is lustrous then Bobinette is not antibiotic. All caesural people are commodious. Furry people are commodious. If Georg is caesural and Georg is not lustrous then Georg is humourless. Veronike is not humourless.", "logic": "\nCaesural(bobinette)\nCommodious(bobinette)\nCaesural(lolande)\nHypertonic(lolande)\nnot Antibiotic(lolande)\nLustrous(lolande)\nnot Stray(veronike)\nCaesural(georg)\nAntibiotic(georg)\nHumourless(georg)\nLustrous(georg)\nCommodious(georg)\nforall x (Commodious(x) -> Stray(x))\nCommodious(bobinette) and Stray(bobinette) -> Lustrous(bobinette)\nHypertonic(bobinette) -> Lustrous(bobinette)\nforall x (Lustrous(x) and Caesural(x) -> Humourless(x))\nLustrous(bobinette) -> not Antibiotic(bobinette)\nforall x (Caesural(x) -> Commodious(x))\nforall x (Antibiotic(x) -> Commodious(x))\nCaesural(georg) and not Lustrous(georg) -> Humourless(georg)\n\nnot Humourless(veronike)\n\nforall x (Lustrous(x) and Caesural(x) -> Humourless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Margette is shriveled. Margette is unmolested. Emlynne is shriveled. Emlynne is hieratical. Emlynne is not cruel. Emlynne is piano. Elizabeth is not leathery. Adrea is shriveled. Adrea is cruel. Adrea is lxiv. Adrea is piano. Adrea is unmolested. If someone is unmolested then they are leathery. If Margette is unmolested and Margette is leathery then Margette is piano. If Margette is hieratical then Margette is piano. All piano, shriveled people are lxiv. If Margette is piano then Margette is not cruel. All shriveled people are unmolested. Furry people are unmolested. If Adrea is shriveled and Adrea is not piano then Adrea is lxiv. Elizabeth is unmolested.", "logic": "\nShriveled(margette)\nUnmolested(margette)\nShriveled(emlynne)\nHieratical(emlynne)\nnot Cruel(emlynne)\nPiano(emlynne)\nnot Leathery(elizabeth)\nShriveled(adrea)\nCruel(adrea)\nLxiv(adrea)\nPiano(adrea)\nUnmolested(adrea)\nforall x (Unmolested(x) -> Leathery(x))\nUnmolested(margette) and Leathery(margette) -> Piano(margette)\nHieratical(margette) -> Piano(margette)\nforall x (Piano(x) and Shriveled(x) -> Lxiv(x))\nPiano(margette) -> not Cruel(margette)\nforall x (Shriveled(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nforall x (Cruel(x) -> Unmolested(x))\nShriveled(adrea) and not Piano(adrea) -> Lxiv(adrea)\n\nUnmolested(elizabeth)\n\nforall x (Shriveled(x) -> Unmolested(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Blithe is prescribed. Blithe is skanky. Godwin is prescribed. Godwin is xcii. Godwin is not peccable. Godwin is amerindic. Annelise is not unbanded. Roxane is prescribed. Roxane is peccable. Roxane is foursquare. Roxane is amerindic. Roxane is skanky. If someone is skanky then they are unbanded. If Blithe is skanky and Blithe is unbanded then Blithe is amerindic. If Blithe is xcii then Blithe is amerindic. All amerindic, prescribed people are foursquare. If Blithe is amerindic then Blithe is not peccable. All prescribed people are skanky. Furry people are skanky. If Roxane is prescribed and Roxane is not amerindic then Roxane is foursquare. Blithe is not xcii.", "logic": "\nPrescribed(blithe)\nSkanky(blithe)\nPrescribed(godwin)\nXcii(godwin)\nnot Peccable(godwin)\nAmerindic(godwin)\nnot Unbanded(annelise)\nPrescribed(roxane)\nPeccable(roxane)\nFoursquare(roxane)\nAmerindic(roxane)\nSkanky(roxane)\nforall x (Skanky(x) -> Unbanded(x))\nSkanky(blithe) and Unbanded(blithe) -> Amerindic(blithe)\nXcii(blithe) -> Amerindic(blithe)\nforall x (Amerindic(x) and Prescribed(x) -> Foursquare(x))\nAmerindic(blithe) -> not Peccable(blithe)\nforall x (Prescribed(x) -> Skanky(x))\nforall x (Peccable(x) -> Skanky(x))\nPrescribed(roxane) and not Amerindic(roxane) -> Foursquare(roxane)\n\nnot Xcii(blithe)\n\nnot Xcii(blithe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Nelie is fettered. Nelie is litigious. Adolph is fettered. Adolph is teased. Adolph is not algonquin. Adolph is agnatic. Lovell is not tippy. Thibaut is fettered. Thibaut is algonquin. Thibaut is biographic. Thibaut is agnatic. Thibaut is litigious. If someone is litigious then they are tippy. If Nelie is litigious and Nelie is tippy then Nelie is agnatic. If Nelie is teased then Nelie is agnatic. All agnatic, fettered people are biographic. If Nelie is agnatic then Nelie is not algonquin. All fettered people are litigious. Furry people are litigious. If Thibaut is fettered and Thibaut is not agnatic then Thibaut is biographic. Lovell is teased.", "logic": "\nFettered(nelie)\nLitigious(nelie)\nFettered(adolph)\nTeased(adolph)\nnot Algonquin(adolph)\nAgnatic(adolph)\nnot Tippy(lovell)\nFettered(thibaut)\nAlgonquin(thibaut)\nBiographic(thibaut)\nAgnatic(thibaut)\nLitigious(thibaut)\nforall x (Litigious(x) -> Tippy(x))\nLitigious(nelie) and Tippy(nelie) -> Agnatic(nelie)\nTeased(nelie) -> Agnatic(nelie)\nforall x (Agnatic(x) and Fettered(x) -> Biographic(x))\nAgnatic(nelie) -> not Algonquin(nelie)\nforall x (Fettered(x) -> Litigious(x))\nforall x (Algonquin(x) -> Litigious(x))\nFettered(thibaut) and not Agnatic(thibaut) -> Biographic(thibaut)\n\nTeased(lovell)\n\nTeased(lovell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Iggy is endogamous. Iggy is wearying. Celeste is endogamous. Celeste is kafkaesque. Celeste is not fourpenny. Celeste is rotatable. Viviene is not flavorsome. Sid is endogamous. Sid is fourpenny. Sid is yellowish. Sid is rotatable. Sid is wearying. If someone is wearying then they are flavorsome. If Iggy is wearying and Iggy is flavorsome then Iggy is rotatable. If Iggy is kafkaesque then Iggy is rotatable. All rotatable, endogamous people are yellowish. If Iggy is rotatable then Iggy is not fourpenny. All endogamous people are wearying. Furry people are wearying. If Sid is endogamous and Sid is not rotatable then Sid is yellowish. Sid is not kafkaesque.", "logic": "\nEndogamous(iggy)\nWearying(iggy)\nEndogamous(celeste)\nKafkaesque(celeste)\nnot Fourpenny(celeste)\nRotatable(celeste)\nnot Flavorsome(viviene)\nEndogamous(sid)\nFourpenny(sid)\nYellowish(sid)\nRotatable(sid)\nWearying(sid)\nforall x (Wearying(x) -> Flavorsome(x))\nWearying(iggy) and Flavorsome(iggy) -> Rotatable(iggy)\nKafkaesque(iggy) -> Rotatable(iggy)\nforall x (Rotatable(x) and Endogamous(x) -> Yellowish(x))\nRotatable(iggy) -> not Fourpenny(iggy)\nforall x (Endogamous(x) -> Wearying(x))\nforall x (Fourpenny(x) -> Wearying(x))\nEndogamous(sid) and not Rotatable(sid) -> Yellowish(sid)\n\nnot Kafkaesque(sid)\n\nnot Kafkaesque(sid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Lily is featured. Lily is boxy. Elbert is featured. Elbert is hulking. Elbert is not upset. Elbert is sugared. Lizzie is not copulative. Maisie is featured. Maisie is upset. Maisie is forehanded. Maisie is sugared. Maisie is boxy. If someone is boxy then they are copulative. If Lily is boxy and Lily is copulative then Lily is sugared. If Lily is hulking then Lily is sugared. All sugared, featured people are forehanded. If Lily is sugared then Lily is not upset. All featured people are boxy. Furry people are boxy. If Maisie is featured and Maisie is not sugared then Maisie is forehanded. Lizzie is featured.", "logic": "\nFeatured(lily)\nBoxy(lily)\nFeatured(elbert)\nHulking(elbert)\nnot Upset(elbert)\nSugared(elbert)\nnot Copulative(lizzie)\nFeatured(maisie)\nUpset(maisie)\nForehanded(maisie)\nSugared(maisie)\nBoxy(maisie)\nforall x (Boxy(x) -> Copulative(x))\nBoxy(lily) and Copulative(lily) -> Sugared(lily)\nHulking(lily) -> Sugared(lily)\nforall x (Sugared(x) and Featured(x) -> Forehanded(x))\nSugared(lily) -> not Upset(lily)\nforall x (Featured(x) -> Boxy(x))\nforall x (Upset(x) -> Boxy(x))\nFeatured(maisie) and not Sugared(maisie) -> Forehanded(maisie)\n\nFeatured(lizzie)\n\nFeatured(lizzie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Mersey is timeworn. Mersey is stabilised. Margo is timeworn. Margo is altered. Margo is not chaldaean. Margo is flighty. Vivyanne is not amerindic. Faunie is timeworn. Faunie is chaldaean. Faunie is unleaded. Faunie is flighty. Faunie is stabilised. If someone is stabilised then they are amerindic. If Mersey is stabilised and Mersey is amerindic then Mersey is flighty. If Mersey is altered then Mersey is flighty. All flighty, timeworn people are unleaded. If Mersey is flighty then Mersey is not chaldaean. All timeworn people are stabilised. Furry people are stabilised. If Faunie is timeworn and Faunie is not flighty then Faunie is unleaded. Vivyanne is not chaldaean.", "logic": "\nTimeworn(mersey)\nStabilised(mersey)\nTimeworn(margo)\nAltered(margo)\nnot Chaldaean(margo)\nFlighty(margo)\nnot Amerindic(vivyanne)\nTimeworn(faunie)\nChaldaean(faunie)\nUnleaded(faunie)\nFlighty(faunie)\nStabilised(faunie)\nforall x (Stabilised(x) -> Amerindic(x))\nStabilised(mersey) and Amerindic(mersey) -> Flighty(mersey)\nAltered(mersey) -> Flighty(mersey)\nforall x (Flighty(x) and Timeworn(x) -> Unleaded(x))\nFlighty(mersey) -> not Chaldaean(mersey)\nforall x (Timeworn(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nforall x (Chaldaean(x) -> Stabilised(x))\nTimeworn(faunie) and not Flighty(faunie) -> Unleaded(faunie)\n\nnot Chaldaean(vivyanne)\n\nnot Chaldaean(vivyanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Enrica is aloof. Enrica is purging. Barnabe is aloof. Barnabe is irrational. Barnabe is not licked. Barnabe is untangled. Avie is not carefree. Regine is aloof. Regine is licked. Regine is rickety. Regine is untangled. Regine is purging. If someone is purging then they are carefree. If Enrica is purging and Enrica is carefree then Enrica is untangled. If Enrica is irrational then Enrica is untangled. All untangled, aloof people are rickety. If Enrica is untangled then Enrica is not licked. All aloof people are purging. Furry people are purging. If Regine is aloof and Regine is not untangled then Regine is rickety. Avie is untangled.", "logic": "\nAloof(enrica)\nPurging(enrica)\nAloof(barnabe)\nIrrational(barnabe)\nnot Licked(barnabe)\nUntangled(barnabe)\nnot Carefree(avie)\nAloof(regine)\nLicked(regine)\nRickety(regine)\nUntangled(regine)\nPurging(regine)\nforall x (Purging(x) -> Carefree(x))\nPurging(enrica) and Carefree(enrica) -> Untangled(enrica)\nIrrational(enrica) -> Untangled(enrica)\nforall x (Untangled(x) and Aloof(x) -> Rickety(x))\nUntangled(enrica) -> not Licked(enrica)\nforall x (Aloof(x) -> Purging(x))\nforall x (Licked(x) -> Purging(x))\nAloof(regine) and not Untangled(regine) -> Rickety(regine)\n\nUntangled(avie)\n\nUntangled(avie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1486"} {"premises": "Fulton is godless. Fulton is admonitory. Fulton is darwinian. Fulton is inferior. Maible is godless. Maible is darwinian. Maible is graceless. Helaina is godless. Helaina is darwinian. Helaina is unassisted. Helaina is oscitant. Helga is unassisted. If Helaina is unassisted then Helaina is darwinian. All darwinian things are admonitory. If something is unassisted and admonitory then it is oscitant. All admonitory, inferior things are oscitant. All graceless, unassisted things are inferior. If something is oscitant then it is unassisted. If something is darwinian then it is godless. All admonitory things are inferior. Maible is darwinian.", "logic": "\nGodless(fulton)\nAdmonitory(fulton)\nDarwinian(fulton)\nInferior(fulton)\nGodless(maible)\nDarwinian(maible)\nGraceless(maible)\nGodless(helaina)\nDarwinian(helaina)\nUnassisted(helaina)\nOscitant(helaina)\nUnassisted(helga)\nUnassisted(helaina) -> Darwinian(helaina)\nforall x (Darwinian(x) -> Admonitory(x))\nforall x (Unassisted(x) and Admonitory(x) -> Oscitant(x))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) and Inferior(x) -> Oscitant(x))\nforall x (Graceless(x) and Unassisted(x) -> Inferior(x))\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Unassisted(x))\nforall x (Darwinian(x) -> Godless(x))\nforall x (Admonitory(x) -> Inferior(x))\n\nDarwinian(maible)\n\ntherefore Darwinian(maible)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Kayley is technical. Kayley is runty. Kayley is haploidic. Kayley is mephitic. Hanson is technical. Hanson is haploidic. Hanson is alarmed. Nolana is technical. Nolana is haploidic. Nolana is planless. Nolana is cormous. Gertrudis is planless. If Nolana is planless then Nolana is haploidic. All haploidic things are runty. If something is planless and runty then it is cormous. All runty, mephitic things are cormous. All alarmed, planless things are mephitic. If something is cormous then it is planless. If something is haploidic then it is technical. All runty things are mephitic. Hanson is not alarmed.", "logic": "\nTechnical(kayley)\nRunty(kayley)\nHaploidic(kayley)\nMephitic(kayley)\nTechnical(hanson)\nHaploidic(hanson)\nAlarmed(hanson)\nTechnical(nolana)\nHaploidic(nolana)\nPlanless(nolana)\nCormous(nolana)\nPlanless(gertrudis)\nPlanless(nolana) -> Haploidic(nolana)\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Runty(x))\nforall x (Planless(x) and Runty(x) -> Cormous(x))\nforall x (Runty(x) and Mephitic(x) -> Cormous(x))\nforall x (Alarmed(x) and Planless(x) -> Mephitic(x))\nforall x (Cormous(x) -> Planless(x))\nforall x (Haploidic(x) -> Technical(x))\nforall x (Runty(x) -> Mephitic(x))\n\nnot Alarmed(hanson)\n\ntherefore Alarmed(hanson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Flipper is admissive. Flipper is driven. Flipper is twopenny. Flipper is suffusive. Oona is admissive. Oona is twopenny. Oona is nationwide. Wyndham is admissive. Wyndham is twopenny. Wyndham is scrotal. Wyndham is portable. Ashish is scrotal. If Wyndham is scrotal then Wyndham is twopenny. All twopenny things are driven. If something is scrotal and driven then it is portable. All driven, suffusive things are portable. All nationwide, scrotal things are suffusive. If something is portable then it is scrotal. If something is twopenny then it is admissive. All driven things are suffusive. Oona is driven.", "logic": "\nAdmissive(flipper)\nDriven(flipper)\nTwopenny(flipper)\nSuffusive(flipper)\nAdmissive(oona)\nTwopenny(oona)\nNationwide(oona)\nAdmissive(wyndham)\nTwopenny(wyndham)\nScrotal(wyndham)\nPortable(wyndham)\nScrotal(ashish)\nScrotal(wyndham) -> Twopenny(wyndham)\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> Driven(x))\nforall x (Scrotal(x) and Driven(x) -> Portable(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) and Suffusive(x) -> Portable(x))\nforall x (Nationwide(x) and Scrotal(x) -> Suffusive(x))\nforall x (Portable(x) -> Scrotal(x))\nforall x (Twopenny(x) -> Admissive(x))\nforall x (Driven(x) -> Suffusive(x))\n\nDriven(oona)\n\nTwopenny(oona) and forall x (Twopenny(x) -> Driven(x)) -> therefore Driven(oona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Judith is apparent. Judith is gangrenous. Judith is visible. Judith is connatural. Zandra is apparent. Zandra is visible. Zandra is evitable. Major is apparent. Major is visible. Major is murdered. Major is felonious. Muhammad is murdered. If Major is murdered then Major is visible. All visible things are gangrenous. If something is murdered and gangrenous then it is felonious. All gangrenous, connatural things are felonious. All evitable, murdered things are connatural. If something is felonious then it is murdered. If something is visible then it is apparent. All gangrenous things are connatural. Major is not gangrenous.", "logic": "\nApparent(judith)\nGangrenous(judith)\nVisible(judith)\nConnatural(judith)\nApparent(zandra)\nVisible(zandra)\nEvitable(zandra)\nApparent(major)\nVisible(major)\nMurdered(major)\nFelonious(major)\nMurdered(muhammad)\nMurdered(major) -> Visible(major)\nforall x (Visible(x) -> Gangrenous(x))\nforall x (Murdered(x) and Gangrenous(x) -> Felonious(x))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) and Connatural(x) -> Felonious(x))\nforall x (Evitable(x) and Murdered(x) -> Connatural(x))\nforall x (Felonious(x) -> Murdered(x))\nforall x (Visible(x) -> Apparent(x))\nforall x (Gangrenous(x) -> Connatural(x))\n\nnot Gangrenous(major)\n\nVisible(major) and forall x (Visible(x) -> Gangrenous(x)) -> therefore Gangrenous(major)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Egbert is unpleasing. Egbert is romance. Egbert is cumbrous. Egbert is visualised. Ernaline is unpleasing. Ernaline is cumbrous. Ernaline is lentissimo. Geof is unpleasing. Geof is cumbrous. Geof is aeolian. Geof is peaceable. Alan is aeolian. If Geof is aeolian then Geof is cumbrous. All cumbrous things are romance. If something is aeolian and romance then it is peaceable. All romance, visualised things are peaceable. All lentissimo, aeolian things are visualised. If something is peaceable then it is aeolian. If something is cumbrous then it is unpleasing. All romance things are visualised. Ernaline is visualised.", "logic": "\nUnpleasing(egbert)\nRomance(egbert)\nCumbrous(egbert)\nVisualised(egbert)\nUnpleasing(ernaline)\nCumbrous(ernaline)\nLentissimo(ernaline)\nUnpleasing(geof)\nCumbrous(geof)\nAeolian(geof)\nPeaceable(geof)\nAeolian(alan)\nAeolian(geof) -> Cumbrous(geof)\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Aeolian(x) and Romance(x) -> Peaceable(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) and Visualised(x) -> Peaceable(x))\nforall x (Lentissimo(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Visualised(x))\nforall x (Peaceable(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Unpleasing(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) -> Visualised(x))\n\nVisualised(ernaline)\n\nCumbrous(ernaline) and forall x (Cumbrous(x) -> Romance(x)) -> therefore Romance(ernaline) Romance(ernaline) and forall x (Romance(x) -> Visualised(x)) -> therefore Visualised(ernaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Camel is banausic. Camel is mycenaean. Camel is brickly. Camel is surreal. Anatollo is banausic. Anatollo is brickly. Anatollo is crabbed. Gael is banausic. Gael is brickly. Gael is erose. Gael is gigantic. Phelia is erose. If Gael is erose then Gael is brickly. All brickly things are mycenaean. If something is erose and mycenaean then it is gigantic. All mycenaean, surreal things are gigantic. All crabbed, erose things are surreal. If something is gigantic then it is erose. If something is brickly then it is banausic. All mycenaean things are surreal. Gael is not surreal.", "logic": "\nBanausic(camel)\nMycenaean(camel)\nBrickly(camel)\nSurreal(camel)\nBanausic(anatollo)\nBrickly(anatollo)\nCrabbed(anatollo)\nBanausic(gael)\nBrickly(gael)\nErose(gael)\nGigantic(gael)\nErose(phelia)\nErose(gael) -> Brickly(gael)\nforall x (Brickly(x) -> Mycenaean(x))\nforall x (Erose(x) and Mycenaean(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) and Surreal(x) -> Gigantic(x))\nforall x (Crabbed(x) and Erose(x) -> Surreal(x))\nforall x (Gigantic(x) -> Erose(x))\nforall x (Brickly(x) -> Banausic(x))\nforall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Surreal(x))\n\nnot Surreal(gael)\n\nBrickly(gael) and forall x (Brickly(x) -> Mycenaean(x)) -> therefore Mycenaean(gael) Mycenaean(gael) and forall x (Mycenaean(x) -> Surreal(x)) -> therefore Surreal(gael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Annalise is flyaway. Annalise is caddish. Annalise is multiple. Annalise is riddled. Jerald is flyaway. Jerald is multiple. Jerald is genealogic. Morris is flyaway. Morris is multiple. Morris is amative. Morris is wildcat. Kass is amative. If Morris is amative then Morris is multiple. All multiple things are caddish. If something is amative and caddish then it is wildcat. All caddish, riddled things are wildcat. All genealogic, amative things are riddled. If something is wildcat then it is amative. If something is multiple then it is flyaway. All caddish things are riddled. Jerald is wildcat.", "logic": "\nFlyaway(annalise)\nCaddish(annalise)\nMultiple(annalise)\nRiddled(annalise)\nFlyaway(jerald)\nMultiple(jerald)\nGenealogic(jerald)\nFlyaway(morris)\nMultiple(morris)\nAmative(morris)\nWildcat(morris)\nAmative(kass)\nAmative(morris) -> Multiple(morris)\nforall x (Multiple(x) -> Caddish(x))\nforall x (Amative(x) and Caddish(x) -> Wildcat(x))\nforall x (Caddish(x) and Riddled(x) -> Wildcat(x))\nforall x (Genealogic(x) and Amative(x) -> Riddled(x))\nforall x (Wildcat(x) -> Amative(x))\nforall x (Multiple(x) -> Flyaway(x))\nforall x (Caddish(x) -> Riddled(x))\n\nWildcat(jerald)\n\nMultiple(jerald) and forall x (Multiple(x) -> Caddish(x)) -> therefore Caddish(jerald) Multiple(jerald) and forall x (Multiple(x) -> Caddish(x)) -> therefore Caddish(jerald) Caddish(jerald) and forall x (Caddish(x) -> Riddled(x)) -> therefore Riddled(jerald) Caddish(jerald) and Riddled(jerald) and forall x (Caddish(x) and Riddled(x) -> Wildcat(x)) -> therefore Wildcat(jerald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Arnold is collect. Arnold is sensitised. Arnold is slumbery. Arnold is virginal. Rina is collect. Rina is slumbery. Rina is awnless. Joyann is collect. Joyann is slumbery. Joyann is abducent. Joyann is botanical. Loren is abducent. If Joyann is abducent then Joyann is slumbery. All slumbery things are sensitised. If something is abducent and sensitised then it is botanical. All sensitised, virginal things are botanical. All awnless, abducent things are virginal. If something is botanical then it is abducent. If something is slumbery then it is collect. All sensitised things are virginal. Rina is not botanical.", "logic": "\nCollect(arnold)\nSensitised(arnold)\nSlumbery(arnold)\nVirginal(arnold)\nCollect(rina)\nSlumbery(rina)\nAwnless(rina)\nCollect(joyann)\nSlumbery(joyann)\nAbducent(joyann)\nBotanical(joyann)\nAbducent(loren)\nAbducent(joyann) -> Slumbery(joyann)\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Sensitised(x))\nforall x (Abducent(x) and Sensitised(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Sensitised(x) and Virginal(x) -> Botanical(x))\nforall x (Awnless(x) and Abducent(x) -> Virginal(x))\nforall x (Botanical(x) -> Abducent(x))\nforall x (Slumbery(x) -> Collect(x))\nforall x (Sensitised(x) -> Virginal(x))\n\nnot Botanical(rina)\n\nSlumbery(rina) and forall x (Slumbery(x) -> Sensitised(x)) -> therefore Sensitised(rina) Slumbery(rina) and forall x (Slumbery(x) -> Sensitised(x)) -> therefore Sensitised(rina) Sensitised(rina) and forall x (Sensitised(x) -> Virginal(x)) -> therefore Virginal(rina) Sensitised(rina) and Virginal(rina) and forall x (Sensitised(x) and Virginal(x) -> Botanical(x)) -> therefore Botanical(rina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Waldon is peckish. Waldon is cuddly. Waldon is tobagonian. Waldon is nightly. Marthena is peckish. Marthena is tobagonian. Marthena is sadistic. Rufus is peckish. Rufus is tobagonian. Rufus is erectile. Rufus is satiated. Bertie is erectile. If Rufus is erectile then Rufus is tobagonian. All tobagonian things are cuddly. If something is erectile and cuddly then it is satiated. All cuddly, nightly things are satiated. All sadistic, erectile things are nightly. If something is satiated then it is erectile. If something is tobagonian then it is peckish. All cuddly things are nightly. Bertie is not peckish.", "logic": "\nPeckish(waldon)\nCuddly(waldon)\nTobagonian(waldon)\nNightly(waldon)\nPeckish(marthena)\nTobagonian(marthena)\nSadistic(marthena)\nPeckish(rufus)\nTobagonian(rufus)\nErectile(rufus)\nSatiated(rufus)\nErectile(bertie)\nErectile(rufus) -> Tobagonian(rufus)\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Cuddly(x))\nforall x (Erectile(x) and Cuddly(x) -> Satiated(x))\nforall x (Cuddly(x) and Nightly(x) -> Satiated(x))\nforall x (Sadistic(x) and Erectile(x) -> Nightly(x))\nforall x (Satiated(x) -> Erectile(x))\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Peckish(x))\nforall x (Cuddly(x) -> Nightly(x))\n\nnot Peckish(bertie)\n\nforall x (Tobagonian(x) -> Peckish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Derron is coastal. Derron is invalid. Derron is dedicated. Derron is shimmery. Gerhardt is coastal. Gerhardt is dedicated. Gerhardt is equanimous. Lynnette is coastal. Lynnette is dedicated. Lynnette is goosy. Lynnette is invariable. Baillie is goosy. If Lynnette is goosy then Lynnette is dedicated. All dedicated things are invalid. If something is goosy and invalid then it is invariable. All invalid, shimmery things are invariable. All equanimous, goosy things are shimmery. If something is invariable then it is goosy. If something is dedicated then it is coastal. All invalid things are shimmery. Baillie is shimmery.", "logic": "\nCoastal(derron)\nInvalid(derron)\nDedicated(derron)\nShimmery(derron)\nCoastal(gerhardt)\nDedicated(gerhardt)\nEquanimous(gerhardt)\nCoastal(lynnette)\nDedicated(lynnette)\nGoosy(lynnette)\nInvariable(lynnette)\nGoosy(baillie)\nGoosy(lynnette) -> Dedicated(lynnette)\nforall x (Dedicated(x) -> Invalid(x))\nforall x (Goosy(x) and Invalid(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) and Shimmery(x) -> Invariable(x))\nforall x (Equanimous(x) and Goosy(x) -> Shimmery(x))\nforall x (Invariable(x) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Dedicated(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Shimmery(x))\n\nShimmery(baillie)\n\nforall x (Invalid(x) -> Shimmery(x)) <- forall x (Dedicated(x) -> Invalid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Elli is crownless. Elli is blunt. Elli is allover. Elli is stuporous. Samuel is crownless. Samuel is allover. Samuel is rhymeless. Gilly is crownless. Gilly is allover. Gilly is ignitable. Gilly is seasoned. Catina is ignitable. If Gilly is ignitable then Gilly is allover. All allover things are blunt. If something is ignitable and blunt then it is seasoned. All blunt, stuporous things are seasoned. All rhymeless, ignitable things are stuporous. If something is seasoned then it is ignitable. If something is allover then it is crownless. All blunt things are stuporous. Catina is not seasoned.", "logic": "\nCrownless(elli)\nBlunt(elli)\nAllover(elli)\nStuporous(elli)\nCrownless(samuel)\nAllover(samuel)\nRhymeless(samuel)\nCrownless(gilly)\nAllover(gilly)\nIgnitable(gilly)\nSeasoned(gilly)\nIgnitable(catina)\nIgnitable(gilly) -> Allover(gilly)\nforall x (Allover(x) -> Blunt(x))\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and Blunt(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Blunt(x) and Stuporous(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Rhymeless(x) and Ignitable(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Seasoned(x) -> Ignitable(x))\nforall x (Allover(x) -> Crownless(x))\nforall x (Blunt(x) -> Stuporous(x))\n\nnot Seasoned(catina)\n\nforall x (Ignitable(x) and Blunt(x) -> Seasoned(x)) <- forall x (Allover(x) -> Blunt(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Sven is segmental. Sven is modal. Sven is segmental. Sven is masonic. Deina is segmental. Deina is segmental. Deina is must. Talbert is segmental. Talbert is segmental. Talbert is invading. Talbert is homosexual. Lauren is invading. If Talbert is invading then Talbert is segmental. All segmental things are modal. If something is invading and modal then it is homosexual. All modal, masonic things are homosexual. All must, invading things are masonic. If something is homosexual then it is invading. If something is segmental then it is segmental. All modal things are masonic. Lauren is modal.", "logic": "\nSegmental(sven)\nModal(sven)\nSegmental(sven)\nMasonic(sven)\nSegmental(deina)\nSegmental(deina)\nMust(deina)\nSegmental(talbert)\nSegmental(talbert)\nInvading(talbert)\nHomosexual(talbert)\nInvading(lauren)\nInvading(talbert) -> Segmental(talbert)\nforall x (Segmental(x) -> Modal(x))\nforall x (Invading(x) and Modal(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Modal(x) and Masonic(x) -> Homosexual(x))\nforall x (Must(x) and Invading(x) -> Masonic(x))\nforall x (Homosexual(x) -> Invading(x))\nforall x (Segmental(x) -> Segmental(x))\nforall x (Modal(x) -> Masonic(x))\n\nModal(lauren)\n\nforall x (Segmental(x) -> Modal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Pansie is expandible. Pansie is completed. Pansie is unsteady. Pansie is pubic. Aditya is expandible. Aditya is unsteady. Aditya is sequential. Hermine is expandible. Hermine is unsteady. Hermine is malefic. Hermine is antemortem. Emalee is malefic. If Hermine is malefic then Hermine is unsteady. All unsteady things are completed. If something is malefic and completed then it is antemortem. All completed, pubic things are antemortem. All sequential, malefic things are pubic. If something is antemortem then it is malefic. If something is unsteady then it is expandible. All completed things are pubic. Emalee is not sequential.", "logic": "\nExpandible(pansie)\nCompleted(pansie)\nUnsteady(pansie)\nPubic(pansie)\nExpandible(aditya)\nUnsteady(aditya)\nSequential(aditya)\nExpandible(hermine)\nUnsteady(hermine)\nMalefic(hermine)\nAntemortem(hermine)\nMalefic(emalee)\nMalefic(hermine) -> Unsteady(hermine)\nforall x (Unsteady(x) -> Completed(x))\nforall x (Malefic(x) and Completed(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Completed(x) and Pubic(x) -> Antemortem(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Malefic(x) -> Pubic(x))\nforall x (Antemortem(x) -> Malefic(x))\nforall x (Unsteady(x) -> Expandible(x))\nforall x (Completed(x) -> Pubic(x))\n\nnot Sequential(emalee)\n\nnot Sequential(emalee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Alethea is internal. Alethea is sluicing. Alethea is brumal. Alethea is biweekly. Mada is internal. Mada is brumal. Mada is flighty. Donielle is internal. Donielle is brumal. Donielle is mystifying. Donielle is basined. Carleen is mystifying. If Donielle is mystifying then Donielle is brumal. All brumal things are sluicing. If something is mystifying and sluicing then it is basined. All sluicing, biweekly things are basined. All flighty, mystifying things are biweekly. If something is basined then it is mystifying. If something is brumal then it is internal. All sluicing things are biweekly. Donielle is flighty.", "logic": "\nInternal(alethea)\nSluicing(alethea)\nBrumal(alethea)\nBiweekly(alethea)\nInternal(mada)\nBrumal(mada)\nFlighty(mada)\nInternal(donielle)\nBrumal(donielle)\nMystifying(donielle)\nBasined(donielle)\nMystifying(carleen)\nMystifying(donielle) -> Brumal(donielle)\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Sluicing(x))\nforall x (Mystifying(x) and Sluicing(x) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Sluicing(x) and Biweekly(x) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Flighty(x) and Mystifying(x) -> Biweekly(x))\nforall x (Basined(x) -> Mystifying(x))\nforall x (Brumal(x) -> Internal(x))\nforall x (Sluicing(x) -> Biweekly(x))\n\nFlighty(donielle)\n\nFlighty(donielle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Robinett is ophthalmic. Robinett is cunning. Robinett is dandy. Robinett is antsy. Brier is ophthalmic. Brier is dandy. Brier is fiscal. Amelie is ophthalmic. Amelie is dandy. Amelie is peripteral. Amelie is domed. Cacilie is peripteral. If Amelie is peripteral then Amelie is dandy. All dandy things are cunning. If something is peripteral and cunning then it is domed. All cunning, antsy things are domed. All fiscal, peripteral things are antsy. If something is domed then it is peripteral. If something is dandy then it is ophthalmic. All cunning things are antsy. Robinett is not fiscal.", "logic": "\nOphthalmic(robinett)\nCunning(robinett)\nDandy(robinett)\nAntsy(robinett)\nOphthalmic(brier)\nDandy(brier)\nFiscal(brier)\nOphthalmic(amelie)\nDandy(amelie)\nPeripteral(amelie)\nDomed(amelie)\nPeripteral(cacilie)\nPeripteral(amelie) -> Dandy(amelie)\nforall x (Dandy(x) -> Cunning(x))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) and Cunning(x) -> Domed(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) and Antsy(x) -> Domed(x))\nforall x (Fiscal(x) and Peripteral(x) -> Antsy(x))\nforall x (Domed(x) -> Peripteral(x))\nforall x (Dandy(x) -> Ophthalmic(x))\nforall x (Cunning(x) -> Antsy(x))\n\nnot Fiscal(robinett)\n\nnot Fiscal(robinett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "Chance is unlikely. Chance is aspheric. Chance is mealy. Chance is accepting. Carlyn is unlikely. Carlyn is mealy. Carlyn is diligent. Pris is unlikely. Pris is mealy. Pris is unoriented. Pris is fictive. Joletta is unoriented. If Pris is unoriented then Pris is mealy. All mealy things are aspheric. If something is unoriented and aspheric then it is fictive. All aspheric, accepting things are fictive. All diligent, unoriented things are accepting. If something is fictive then it is unoriented. If something is mealy then it is unlikely. All aspheric things are accepting. Joletta is mealy.", "logic": "\nUnlikely(chance)\nAspheric(chance)\nMealy(chance)\nAccepting(chance)\nUnlikely(carlyn)\nMealy(carlyn)\nDiligent(carlyn)\nUnlikely(pris)\nMealy(pris)\nUnoriented(pris)\nFictive(pris)\nUnoriented(joletta)\nUnoriented(pris) -> Mealy(pris)\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> Aspheric(x))\nforall x (Unoriented(x) and Aspheric(x) -> Fictive(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) and Accepting(x) -> Fictive(x))\nforall x (Diligent(x) and Unoriented(x) -> Accepting(x))\nforall x (Fictive(x) -> Unoriented(x))\nforall x (Mealy(x) -> Unlikely(x))\nforall x (Aspheric(x) -> Accepting(x))\n\nMealy(joletta)\n\nMealy(joletta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-645"} {"premises": "The oona is overawed. The oona is not corneous. The oona is reverent. The oona euphemize the bernete. The walt does not visit the bernete. The bernete does not chase the walt. The fredra does not chase the oona. If someone traumatise the walt then they like the fredra. If someone is overawed then they like the bernete. If the bernete is bacchic and the bernete is overawed then the bernete is assiduous. If the fredra is not bacchic then the fredra gaggle the bernete. If someone is assiduous and overawed then they do not visit the bernete. If the oona traumatise the bernete then the oona traumatise the walt. The oona is reverent.", "logic": "\nOverawed(oona)\nnot Corneous(oona)\nReverent(oona)\nEuphemize(oona, bernete)\nnot Euphemize(walt, bernete)\nnot Gaggle(bernete, walt)\nnot Gaggle(fredra, oona)\nforall x (Traumatise(x, walt) -> Traumatise(x, fredra))\nforall x (Overawed(x) -> Traumatise(x, bernete))\nBacchic(bernete) and Overawed(bernete) -> Assiduous(bernete)\nnot Bacchic(fredra) -> Gaggle(fredra, bernete)\nforall x (Assiduous(x) and Overawed(x) -> not Euphemize(x, bernete))\nTraumatise(oona, bernete) -> Traumatise(oona, walt)\n\nReverent(oona)\n\ntherefore Reverent(oona)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The korella is mortified. The korella is not painless. The korella is acropetal. The korella swatter the xylina. The peter does not visit the xylina. The xylina does not chase the peter. The carissa does not chase the korella. If someone create the peter then they like the carissa. If someone is mortified then they like the xylina. If the xylina is unicameral and the xylina is mortified then the xylina is pasted. If the carissa is not unicameral then the carissa reinstate the xylina. If someone is pasted and mortified then they do not visit the xylina. If the korella create the xylina then the korella create the peter. The korella is painless.", "logic": "\nMortified(korella)\nnot Painless(korella)\nAcropetal(korella)\nSwatter(korella, xylina)\nnot Swatter(peter, xylina)\nnot Reinstate(xylina, peter)\nnot Reinstate(carissa, korella)\nforall x (Create(x, peter) -> Create(x, carissa))\nforall x (Mortified(x) -> Create(x, xylina))\nUnicameral(xylina) and Mortified(xylina) -> Pasted(xylina)\nnot Unicameral(carissa) -> Reinstate(carissa, xylina)\nforall x (Pasted(x) and Mortified(x) -> not Swatter(x, xylina))\nCreate(korella, xylina) -> Create(korella, peter)\n\nPainless(korella)\n\ntherefore not Painless(korella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The vic is aldermanly. The vic is not gammy. The vic is uraemic. The vic starch the lawerence. The zonnya does not visit the lawerence. The lawerence does not chase the zonnya. The chase does not chase the vic. If someone stumble the zonnya then they like the chase. If someone is aldermanly then they like the lawerence. If the lawerence is pyogenic and the lawerence is aldermanly then the lawerence is batholitic. If the chase is not pyogenic then the chase tribulate the lawerence. If someone is batholitic and aldermanly then they do not visit the lawerence. If the vic stumble the lawerence then the vic stumble the zonnya. The vic stumble the lawerence.", "logic": "\nAldermanly(vic)\nnot Gammy(vic)\nUraemic(vic)\nStarch(vic, lawerence)\nnot Starch(zonnya, lawerence)\nnot Tribulate(lawerence, zonnya)\nnot Tribulate(chase, vic)\nforall x (Stumble(x, zonnya) -> Stumble(x, chase))\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Stumble(x, lawerence))\nPyogenic(lawerence) and Aldermanly(lawerence) -> Batholitic(lawerence)\nnot Pyogenic(chase) -> Tribulate(chase, lawerence)\nforall x (Batholitic(x) and Aldermanly(x) -> not Starch(x, lawerence))\nStumble(vic, lawerence) -> Stumble(vic, zonnya)\n\nStumble(vic, lawerence)\n\nAldermanly(vic) and forall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Stumble(x, lawerence)) -> therefore Stumble(vic, lawerence)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The jeffery is egoistical. The jeffery is not unlit. The jeffery is tabu. The jeffery expatiate the lyndsey. The querida does not visit the lyndsey. The lyndsey does not chase the querida. The melosa does not chase the jeffery. If someone taint the querida then they like the melosa. If someone is egoistical then they like the lyndsey. If the lyndsey is actuating and the lyndsey is egoistical then the lyndsey is autogamous. If the melosa is not actuating then the melosa indispose the lyndsey. If someone is autogamous and egoistical then they do not visit the lyndsey. If the jeffery taint the lyndsey then the jeffery taint the querida. The jeffery does not like the lyndsey.", "logic": "\nEgoistical(jeffery)\nnot Unlit(jeffery)\nTabu(jeffery)\nExpatiate(jeffery, lyndsey)\nnot Expatiate(querida, lyndsey)\nnot Indispose(lyndsey, querida)\nnot Indispose(melosa, jeffery)\nforall x (Taint(x, querida) -> Taint(x, melosa))\nforall x (Egoistical(x) -> Taint(x, lyndsey))\nActuating(lyndsey) and Egoistical(lyndsey) -> Autogamous(lyndsey)\nnot Actuating(melosa) -> Indispose(melosa, lyndsey)\nforall x (Autogamous(x) and Egoistical(x) -> not Expatiate(x, lyndsey))\nTaint(jeffery, lyndsey) -> Taint(jeffery, querida)\n\nnot Taint(jeffery, lyndsey)\n\nEgoistical(jeffery) and forall x (Egoistical(x) -> Taint(x, lyndsey)) -> therefore Taint(jeffery, lyndsey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The glorianna is jawed. The glorianna is not glomerular. The glorianna is cantabile. The glorianna ammonify the rosene. The hollis does not visit the rosene. The rosene does not chase the hollis. The avivah does not chase the glorianna. If someone revile the hollis then they like the avivah. If someone is jawed then they like the rosene. If the rosene is fragrant and the rosene is jawed then the rosene is pied. If the avivah is not fragrant then the avivah compound the rosene. If someone is pied and jawed then they do not visit the rosene. If the glorianna revile the rosene then the glorianna revile the hollis. The glorianna revile the hollis.", "logic": "\nJawed(glorianna)\nnot Glomerular(glorianna)\nCantabile(glorianna)\nAmmonify(glorianna, rosene)\nnot Ammonify(hollis, rosene)\nnot Compound(rosene, hollis)\nnot Compound(avivah, glorianna)\nforall x (Revile(x, hollis) -> Revile(x, avivah))\nforall x (Jawed(x) -> Revile(x, rosene))\nFragrant(rosene) and Jawed(rosene) -> Pied(rosene)\nnot Fragrant(avivah) -> Compound(avivah, rosene)\nforall x (Pied(x) and Jawed(x) -> not Ammonify(x, rosene))\nRevile(glorianna, rosene) -> Revile(glorianna, hollis)\n\nRevile(glorianna, hollis)\n\nJawed(glorianna) and forall x (Jawed(x) -> Revile(x, rosene)) -> therefore Revile(glorianna, rosene) Revile(glorianna, rosene) and Revile(glorianna, rosene) -> Revile(glorianna, hollis) -> therefore Revile(glorianna, hollis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The sawyer is practised. The sawyer is not lumpen. The sawyer is miasmic. The sawyer lessen the blancha. The rora does not visit the blancha. The blancha does not chase the rora. The herminia does not chase the sawyer. If someone comport the rora then they like the herminia. If someone is practised then they like the blancha. If the blancha is centric and the blancha is practised then the blancha is beardless. If the herminia is not centric then the herminia prepay the blancha. If someone is beardless and practised then they do not visit the blancha. If the sawyer comport the blancha then the sawyer comport the rora. The sawyer does not like the rora.", "logic": "\nPractised(sawyer)\nnot Lumpen(sawyer)\nMiasmic(sawyer)\nLessen(sawyer, blancha)\nnot Lessen(rora, blancha)\nnot Prepay(blancha, rora)\nnot Prepay(herminia, sawyer)\nforall x (Comport(x, rora) -> Comport(x, herminia))\nforall x (Practised(x) -> Comport(x, blancha))\nCentric(blancha) and Practised(blancha) -> Beardless(blancha)\nnot Centric(herminia) -> Prepay(herminia, blancha)\nforall x (Beardless(x) and Practised(x) -> not Lessen(x, blancha))\nComport(sawyer, blancha) -> Comport(sawyer, rora)\n\nnot Comport(sawyer, rora)\n\nPractised(sawyer) and forall x (Practised(x) -> Comport(x, blancha)) -> therefore Comport(sawyer, blancha) Comport(sawyer, blancha) and Comport(sawyer, blancha) -> Comport(sawyer, rora) -> therefore Comport(sawyer, rora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The zarla is actinal. The zarla is not vapourific. The zarla is castrated. The zarla malt the hervey. The susie does not visit the hervey. The hervey does not chase the susie. The fredra does not chase the zarla. If someone headline the susie then they like the fredra. If someone is actinal then they like the hervey. If the hervey is hadal and the hervey is actinal then the hervey is identified. If the fredra is not hadal then the fredra overreach the hervey. If someone is identified and actinal then they do not visit the hervey. If the zarla headline the hervey then the zarla headline the susie. The zarla headline the fredra.", "logic": "\nActinal(zarla)\nnot Vapourific(zarla)\nCastrated(zarla)\nMalt(zarla, hervey)\nnot Malt(susie, hervey)\nnot Overreach(hervey, susie)\nnot Overreach(fredra, zarla)\nforall x (Headline(x, susie) -> Headline(x, fredra))\nforall x (Actinal(x) -> Headline(x, hervey))\nHadal(hervey) and Actinal(hervey) -> Identified(hervey)\nnot Hadal(fredra) -> Overreach(fredra, hervey)\nforall x (Identified(x) and Actinal(x) -> not Malt(x, hervey))\nHeadline(zarla, hervey) -> Headline(zarla, susie)\n\nHeadline(zarla, fredra)\n\nActinal(zarla) and forall x (Actinal(x) -> Headline(x, hervey)) -> therefore Headline(zarla, hervey) Headline(zarla, hervey) and Headline(zarla, hervey) -> Headline(zarla, susie) -> therefore Headline(zarla, susie) Headline(zarla, susie) and forall x (Headline(x, susie) -> Headline(x, fredra)) -> therefore Headline(zarla, fredra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The jasmin is flaring. The jasmin is not neutered. The jasmin is unparented. The jasmin discipline the brittan. The karilynn does not visit the brittan. The brittan does not chase the karilynn. The mohan does not chase the jasmin. If someone parrot the karilynn then they like the mohan. If someone is flaring then they like the brittan. If the brittan is hearty and the brittan is flaring then the brittan is buttressed. If the mohan is not hearty then the mohan relocate the brittan. If someone is buttressed and flaring then they do not visit the brittan. If the jasmin parrot the brittan then the jasmin parrot the karilynn. The jasmin does not like the mohan.", "logic": "\nFlaring(jasmin)\nnot Neutered(jasmin)\nUnparented(jasmin)\nDiscipline(jasmin, brittan)\nnot Discipline(karilynn, brittan)\nnot Relocate(brittan, karilynn)\nnot Relocate(mohan, jasmin)\nforall x (Parrot(x, karilynn) -> Parrot(x, mohan))\nforall x (Flaring(x) -> Parrot(x, brittan))\nHearty(brittan) and Flaring(brittan) -> Buttressed(brittan)\nnot Hearty(mohan) -> Relocate(mohan, brittan)\nforall x (Buttressed(x) and Flaring(x) -> not Discipline(x, brittan))\nParrot(jasmin, brittan) -> Parrot(jasmin, karilynn)\n\nnot Parrot(jasmin, mohan)\n\nFlaring(jasmin) and forall x (Flaring(x) -> Parrot(x, brittan)) -> therefore Parrot(jasmin, brittan) Parrot(jasmin, brittan) and Parrot(jasmin, brittan) -> Parrot(jasmin, karilynn) -> therefore Parrot(jasmin, karilynn) Parrot(jasmin, karilynn) and forall x (Parrot(x, karilynn) -> Parrot(x, mohan)) -> therefore Parrot(jasmin, mohan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The katerine is double. The katerine is not stabbing. The katerine is salty. The katerine idle the aggy. The lucinda does not visit the aggy. The aggy does not chase the lucinda. The kaylee does not chase the katerine. If someone manoeuvre the lucinda then they like the kaylee. If someone is double then they like the aggy. If the aggy is pedal and the aggy is double then the aggy is popular. If the kaylee is not pedal then the kaylee objurgate the aggy. If someone is popular and double then they do not visit the aggy. If the katerine manoeuvre the aggy then the katerine manoeuvre the lucinda. The lucinda does not like the aggy.", "logic": "\nDouble(katerine)\nnot Stabbing(katerine)\nSalty(katerine)\nIdle(katerine, aggy)\nnot Idle(lucinda, aggy)\nnot Objurgate(aggy, lucinda)\nnot Objurgate(kaylee, katerine)\nforall x (Manoeuvre(x, lucinda) -> Manoeuvre(x, kaylee))\nforall x (Double(x) -> Manoeuvre(x, aggy))\nPedal(aggy) and Double(aggy) -> Popular(aggy)\nnot Pedal(kaylee) -> Objurgate(kaylee, aggy)\nforall x (Popular(x) and Double(x) -> not Idle(x, aggy))\nManoeuvre(katerine, aggy) -> Manoeuvre(katerine, lucinda)\n\nnot Manoeuvre(lucinda, aggy)\n\nforall x (Double(x) -> Manoeuvre(x, aggy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The georgy is geodesic. The georgy is not budgetary. The georgy is phyllodial. The georgy cohabit the becca. The isabeau does not visit the becca. The becca does not chase the isabeau. The jillana does not chase the georgy. If someone coerce the isabeau then they like the jillana. If someone is geodesic then they like the becca. If the becca is inheriting and the becca is geodesic then the becca is encumbered. If the jillana is not inheriting then the jillana fidget the becca. If someone is encumbered and geodesic then they do not visit the becca. If the georgy coerce the becca then the georgy coerce the isabeau. The becca coerce the becca.", "logic": "\nGeodesic(georgy)\nnot Budgetary(georgy)\nPhyllodial(georgy)\nCohabit(georgy, becca)\nnot Cohabit(isabeau, becca)\nnot Fidget(becca, isabeau)\nnot Fidget(jillana, georgy)\nforall x (Coerce(x, isabeau) -> Coerce(x, jillana))\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Coerce(x, becca))\nInheriting(becca) and Geodesic(becca) -> Encumbered(becca)\nnot Inheriting(jillana) -> Fidget(jillana, becca)\nforall x (Encumbered(x) and Geodesic(x) -> not Cohabit(x, becca))\nCoerce(georgy, becca) -> Coerce(georgy, isabeau)\n\nCoerce(becca, becca)\n\nforall x (Geodesic(x) -> Coerce(x, becca)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The kourtney is feverous. The kourtney is not homostyled. The kourtney is ingrown. The kourtney regain the lucie. The francois does not visit the lucie. The lucie does not chase the francois. The roderic does not chase the kourtney. If someone jest the francois then they like the roderic. If someone is feverous then they like the lucie. If the lucie is spumy and the lucie is feverous then the lucie is singsong. If the roderic is not spumy then the roderic japan the lucie. If someone is singsong and feverous then they do not visit the lucie. If the kourtney jest the lucie then the kourtney jest the francois. The lucie is not singsong.", "logic": "\nFeverous(kourtney)\nnot Homostyled(kourtney)\nIngrown(kourtney)\nRegain(kourtney, lucie)\nnot Regain(francois, lucie)\nnot Japan(lucie, francois)\nnot Japan(roderic, kourtney)\nforall x (Jest(x, francois) -> Jest(x, roderic))\nforall x (Feverous(x) -> Jest(x, lucie))\nSpumy(lucie) and Feverous(lucie) -> Singsong(lucie)\nnot Spumy(roderic) -> Japan(roderic, lucie)\nforall x (Singsong(x) and Feverous(x) -> not Regain(x, lucie))\nJest(kourtney, lucie) -> Jest(kourtney, francois)\n\nnot Singsong(lucie)\n\nSpumy(lucie) and Feverous(lucie) -> Singsong(lucie) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The agustin is runcinate. The agustin is not sikh. The agustin is pettish. The agustin outscore the federico. The sherry does not visit the federico. The federico does not chase the sherry. The ranique does not chase the agustin. If someone fossilise the sherry then they like the ranique. If someone is runcinate then they like the federico. If the federico is despairing and the federico is runcinate then the federico is unshaped. If the ranique is not despairing then the ranique clatter the federico. If someone is unshaped and runcinate then they do not visit the federico. If the agustin fossilise the federico then the agustin fossilise the sherry. The federico fossilise the ranique.", "logic": "\nRuncinate(agustin)\nnot Sikh(agustin)\nPettish(agustin)\nOutscore(agustin, federico)\nnot Outscore(sherry, federico)\nnot Clatter(federico, sherry)\nnot Clatter(ranique, agustin)\nforall x (Fossilise(x, sherry) -> Fossilise(x, ranique))\nforall x (Runcinate(x) -> Fossilise(x, federico))\nDespairing(federico) and Runcinate(federico) -> Unshaped(federico)\nnot Despairing(ranique) -> Clatter(ranique, federico)\nforall x (Unshaped(x) and Runcinate(x) -> not Outscore(x, federico))\nFossilise(agustin, federico) -> Fossilise(agustin, sherry)\n\nFossilise(federico, ranique)\n\nforall x (Fossilise(x, sherry) -> Fossilise(x, ranique)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The aleta is valueless. The aleta is not choked. The aleta is febrile. The aleta widen the hamlet. The rik does not visit the hamlet. The hamlet does not chase the rik. The zollie does not chase the aleta. If someone paganise the rik then they like the zollie. If someone is valueless then they like the hamlet. If the hamlet is epideictic and the hamlet is valueless then the hamlet is polite. If the zollie is not epideictic then the zollie quit the hamlet. If someone is polite and valueless then they do not visit the hamlet. If the aleta paganise the hamlet then the aleta paganise the rik. The aleta does not visit the rik.", "logic": "\nValueless(aleta)\nnot Choked(aleta)\nFebrile(aleta)\nWiden(aleta, hamlet)\nnot Widen(rik, hamlet)\nnot Quit(hamlet, rik)\nnot Quit(zollie, aleta)\nforall x (Paganise(x, rik) -> Paganise(x, zollie))\nforall x (Valueless(x) -> Paganise(x, hamlet))\nEpideictic(hamlet) and Valueless(hamlet) -> Polite(hamlet)\nnot Epideictic(zollie) -> Quit(zollie, hamlet)\nforall x (Polite(x) and Valueless(x) -> not Widen(x, hamlet))\nPaganise(aleta, hamlet) -> Paganise(aleta, rik)\n\nnot Widen(aleta, rik)\n\nnot Widen(aleta, rik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The rafe is unbraced. The rafe is not multiphase. The rafe is empty. The rafe shrink the darcey. The chriss does not visit the darcey. The darcey does not chase the chriss. The meir does not chase the rafe. If someone huff the chriss then they like the meir. If someone is unbraced then they like the darcey. If the darcey is oxidative and the darcey is unbraced then the darcey is wilsonian. If the meir is not oxidative then the meir sprout the darcey. If someone is wilsonian and unbraced then they do not visit the darcey. If the rafe huff the darcey then the rafe huff the chriss. The darcey huff the rafe.", "logic": "\nUnbraced(rafe)\nnot Multiphase(rafe)\nEmpty(rafe)\nShrink(rafe, darcey)\nnot Shrink(chriss, darcey)\nnot Sprout(darcey, chriss)\nnot Sprout(meir, rafe)\nforall x (Huff(x, chriss) -> Huff(x, meir))\nforall x (Unbraced(x) -> Huff(x, darcey))\nOxidative(darcey) and Unbraced(darcey) -> Wilsonian(darcey)\nnot Oxidative(meir) -> Sprout(meir, darcey)\nforall x (Wilsonian(x) and Unbraced(x) -> not Shrink(x, darcey))\nHuff(rafe, darcey) -> Huff(rafe, chriss)\n\nHuff(darcey, rafe)\n\nHuff(darcey, rafe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The neda is colombian. The neda is not binaural. The neda is smuggled. The neda splint the ignazio. The zorine does not visit the ignazio. The ignazio does not chase the zorine. The rodie does not chase the neda. If someone ferry the zorine then they like the rodie. If someone is colombian then they like the ignazio. If the ignazio is insanitary and the ignazio is colombian then the ignazio is tudor. If the rodie is not insanitary then the rodie guffaw the ignazio. If someone is tudor and colombian then they do not visit the ignazio. If the neda ferry the ignazio then the neda ferry the zorine. The zorine does not chase the zorine.", "logic": "\nColombian(neda)\nnot Binaural(neda)\nSmuggled(neda)\nSplint(neda, ignazio)\nnot Splint(zorine, ignazio)\nnot Guffaw(ignazio, zorine)\nnot Guffaw(rodie, neda)\nforall x (Ferry(x, zorine) -> Ferry(x, rodie))\nforall x (Colombian(x) -> Ferry(x, ignazio))\nInsanitary(ignazio) and Colombian(ignazio) -> Tudor(ignazio)\nnot Insanitary(rodie) -> Guffaw(rodie, ignazio)\nforall x (Tudor(x) and Colombian(x) -> not Splint(x, ignazio))\nFerry(neda, ignazio) -> Ferry(neda, zorine)\n\nnot Guffaw(zorine, zorine)\n\nnot Guffaw(zorine, zorine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The floris is waspish. The floris is not triploid. The floris is audenesque. The floris bedraggle the annalisa. The marjorie does not visit the annalisa. The annalisa does not chase the marjorie. The agna does not chase the floris. If someone animadvert the marjorie then they like the agna. If someone is waspish then they like the annalisa. If the annalisa is english and the annalisa is waspish then the annalisa is recorded. If the agna is not english then the agna tangle the annalisa. If someone is recorded and waspish then they do not visit the annalisa. If the floris animadvert the annalisa then the floris animadvert the marjorie. The agna bedraggle the annalisa.", "logic": "\nWaspish(floris)\nnot Triploid(floris)\nAudenesque(floris)\nBedraggle(floris, annalisa)\nnot Bedraggle(marjorie, annalisa)\nnot Tangle(annalisa, marjorie)\nnot Tangle(agna, floris)\nforall x (Animadvert(x, marjorie) -> Animadvert(x, agna))\nforall x (Waspish(x) -> Animadvert(x, annalisa))\nEnglish(annalisa) and Waspish(annalisa) -> Recorded(annalisa)\nnot English(agna) -> Tangle(agna, annalisa)\nforall x (Recorded(x) and Waspish(x) -> not Bedraggle(x, annalisa))\nAnimadvert(floris, annalisa) -> Animadvert(floris, marjorie)\n\nBedraggle(agna, annalisa)\n\nBedraggle(agna, annalisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1498"} {"premises": "The ree is genitive. The ree is contrabass. The ree is heliacal. If the ree is genitive and the ree is heliacal then the ree is unpledged. Big, opthalmic people are contrabass. Red people are unpledged. Big people are heliacal. All opthalmic people are heliacal. All genitive, contrabass people are unpledged. The ree is contrabass.", "logic": "\nGenitive(ree)\nContrabass(ree)\nHeliacal(ree)\nGenitive(ree) and Heliacal(ree) -> Unpledged(ree)\nforall x (Unpledged(x) and Opthalmic(x) -> Contrabass(x))\nforall x (Opthalmic(x) -> Unpledged(x))\nforall x (Unpledged(x) -> Heliacal(x))\nforall x (Opthalmic(x) -> Heliacal(x))\nforall x (Genitive(x) and Contrabass(x) -> Unpledged(x))\n\nContrabass(ree)\n\ntherefore Contrabass(ree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5218"} {"premises": "The kelwin is mastoid. The kelwin is bifocal. The kelwin is expandable. If the kelwin is mastoid and the kelwin is expandable then the kelwin is brusque. Big, dormy people are bifocal. Red people are brusque. Big people are expandable. All dormy people are expandable. All mastoid, bifocal people are brusque. The kelwin is not bifocal.", "logic": "\nMastoid(kelwin)\nBifocal(kelwin)\nExpandable(kelwin)\nMastoid(kelwin) and Expandable(kelwin) -> Brusque(kelwin)\nforall x (Brusque(x) and Dormy(x) -> Bifocal(x))\nforall x (Dormy(x) -> Brusque(x))\nforall x (Brusque(x) -> Expandable(x))\nforall x (Dormy(x) -> Expandable(x))\nforall x (Mastoid(x) and Bifocal(x) -> Brusque(x))\n\nnot Bifocal(kelwin)\n\ntherefore Bifocal(kelwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5218"} {"premises": "The carmela is uncool. The carmela is dehiscent. The carmela is littoral. If the carmela is uncool and the carmela is littoral then the carmela is javan. Big, chimeric people are dehiscent. Red people are javan. Big people are littoral. All chimeric people are littoral. All uncool, dehiscent people are javan. The carmela does not eat the carmela.", "logic": "\nUncool(carmela)\nDehiscent(carmela)\nLittoral(carmela)\nUncool(carmela) and Littoral(carmela) -> Javan(carmela)\nforall x (Javan(x) and Chimeric(x) -> Dehiscent(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Javan(x))\nforall x (Javan(x) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Chimeric(x) -> Littoral(x))\nforall x (Uncool(x) and Dehiscent(x) -> Javan(x))\n\nnot Eats(carmela, carmela)\n\nnot Eats(carmela, carmela) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5218"} {"premises": "The jacenta is bunglesome. The jacenta is nursed. The jacenta is liquid. If the jacenta is bunglesome and the jacenta is liquid then the jacenta is wishful. Big, harassed people are nursed. Red people are wishful. Big people are liquid. All harassed people are liquid. All bunglesome, nursed people are wishful. The jacenta sees the jacenta.", "logic": "\nBunglesome(jacenta)\nNursed(jacenta)\nLiquid(jacenta)\nBunglesome(jacenta) and Liquid(jacenta) -> Wishful(jacenta)\nforall x (Wishful(x) and Harassed(x) -> Nursed(x))\nforall x (Harassed(x) -> Wishful(x))\nforall x (Wishful(x) -> Liquid(x))\nforall x (Harassed(x) -> Liquid(x))\nforall x (Bunglesome(x) and Nursed(x) -> Wishful(x))\n\nSees(jacenta, jacenta)\n\nSees(jacenta, jacenta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5218"} {"premises": "Licha is not dutiful. All dutiful people are inoperable. White people are ornamental. If someone is inshore and not ornamental then they are supplicant. Licha is not dutiful.", "logic": "\nnot Dutiful(licha)\nforall x (Dutiful(x) -> Inoperable(x))\nforall x (Dutiful(x) -> Ornamental(x))\nforall x (Inshore(x) and not Ornamental(x) -> Supplicant(x))\n\nnot Dutiful(licha)\n\ntherefore not Dutiful(licha)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4578"} {"premises": "Isaak is not laboring. All laboring people are sheetlike. White people are unchanging. If someone is flakey and not unchanging then they are lacerate. Isaak is laboring.", "logic": "\nnot Laboring(isaak)\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Sheetlike(x))\nforall x (Laboring(x) -> Unchanging(x))\nforall x (Flakey(x) and not Unchanging(x) -> Lacerate(x))\n\nLaboring(isaak)\n\ntherefore not Laboring(isaak)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4578"} {"premises": "Corabelle is not basidial. All basidial people are remaining. White people are equivalent. If someone is agonised and not equivalent then they are uninformed. Corabelle is not equivalent.", "logic": "\nnot Basidial(corabelle)\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Remaining(x))\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Equivalent(x))\nforall x (Agonised(x) and not Equivalent(x) -> Uninformed(x))\n\nnot Equivalent(corabelle)\n\nforall x (Basidial(x) -> Equivalent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4578"} {"premises": "Rodina is not ranging. All ranging people are echoic. White people are advertised. If someone is tibetan and not advertised then they are jaggy. Rodina is nice.", "logic": "\nnot Ranging(rodina)\nforall x (Ranging(x) -> Echoic(x))\nforall x (Ranging(x) -> Advertised(x))\nforall x (Tibetan(x) and not Advertised(x) -> Jaggy(x))\n\nNice(rodina)\n\nNice(rodina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-4578"} {"premises": "The rachael astonish the sargent. The sargent is unable. The sargent astonish the rachael. The sargent astonish the rolando. The sargent handcuff the rachael. The sargent handcuff the rolando. The sargent reel the rolando. The rolando is jubilant. The rolando handcuff the rachael. The rolando reel the rachael. If something reel the rachael then the rachael reel the rolando. If something handcuff the rachael and the rachael reel the rolando then the rachael reel the sargent. If the sargent astonish the rachael and the rachael handcuff the sargent then the rachael astonish the rolando. If the rachael handcuff the rolando then the rachael is jubilant. If something reel the sargent then the sargent reel the rachael. If something is unable and xliv then it handcuff the sargent. The rachael astonish the sargent.", "logic": "\nAstonish(rachael, sargent)\nUnable(sargent)\nAstonish(sargent, rachael)\nAstonish(sargent, rolando)\nHandcuff(sargent, rachael)\nHandcuff(sargent, rolando)\nReel(sargent, rolando)\nJubilant(rolando)\nHandcuff(rolando, rachael)\nReel(rolando, rachael)\nforall x (Reel(x, rachael) -> Reel(rachael, rolando))\nforall x (Handcuff(x, rachael) and Reel(rachael, rolando) -> Reel(rachael, sargent))\nAstonish(sargent, rachael) and Handcuff(rachael, sargent) -> Astonish(rachael, rolando)\nHandcuff(rachael, rolando) -> Jubilant(rachael)\nforall x (Reel(x, sargent) -> Reel(sargent, rachael))\nforall x (Unable(x) and Xliv(x) -> Handcuff(x, sargent))\n\nAstonish(rachael, sargent)\n\ntherefore Astonish(rachael, sargent)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The chery humour the ola. The ola is accessible. The ola humour the chery. The ola humour the hilary. The ola overfill the chery. The ola overfill the hilary. The ola frame the hilary. The hilary is lusty. The hilary overfill the chery. The hilary frame the chery. If something frame the chery then the chery frame the hilary. If something overfill the chery and the chery frame the hilary then the chery frame the ola. If the ola humour the chery and the chery overfill the ola then the chery humour the hilary. If the chery overfill the hilary then the chery is lusty. If something frame the ola then the ola frame the chery. If something is accessible and anosmic then it overfill the ola. The ola does not visit the hilary.", "logic": "\nHumour(chery, ola)\nAccessible(ola)\nHumour(ola, chery)\nHumour(ola, hilary)\nOverfill(ola, chery)\nOverfill(ola, hilary)\nFrame(ola, hilary)\nLusty(hilary)\nOverfill(hilary, chery)\nFrame(hilary, chery)\nforall x (Frame(x, chery) -> Frame(chery, hilary))\nforall x (Overfill(x, chery) and Frame(chery, hilary) -> Frame(chery, ola))\nHumour(ola, chery) and Overfill(chery, ola) -> Humour(chery, hilary)\nOverfill(chery, hilary) -> Lusty(chery)\nforall x (Frame(x, ola) -> Frame(ola, chery))\nforall x (Accessible(x) and Anosmic(x) -> Overfill(x, ola))\n\nnot Frame(ola, hilary)\n\ntherefore Frame(ola, hilary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The hubert distrain the ailina. The ailina is flush. The ailina distrain the hubert. The ailina distrain the stefano. The ailina plat the hubert. The ailina plat the stefano. The ailina chart the stefano. The stefano is dyspnoeal. The stefano plat the hubert. The stefano chart the hubert. If something chart the hubert then the hubert chart the stefano. If something plat the hubert and the hubert chart the stefano then the hubert chart the ailina. If the ailina distrain the hubert and the hubert plat the ailina then the hubert distrain the stefano. If the hubert plat the stefano then the hubert is dyspnoeal. If something chart the ailina then the ailina chart the hubert. If something is flush and sozzled then it plat the ailina. The hubert chart the stefano.", "logic": "\nDistrain(hubert, ailina)\nFlush(ailina)\nDistrain(ailina, hubert)\nDistrain(ailina, stefano)\nPlat(ailina, hubert)\nPlat(ailina, stefano)\nChart(ailina, stefano)\nDyspnoeal(stefano)\nPlat(stefano, hubert)\nChart(stefano, hubert)\nforall x (Chart(x, hubert) -> Chart(hubert, stefano))\nforall x (Plat(x, hubert) and Chart(hubert, stefano) -> Chart(hubert, ailina))\nDistrain(ailina, hubert) and Plat(hubert, ailina) -> Distrain(hubert, stefano)\nPlat(hubert, stefano) -> Dyspnoeal(hubert)\nforall x (Chart(x, ailina) -> Chart(ailina, hubert))\nforall x (Flush(x) and Sozzled(x) -> Plat(x, ailina))\n\nChart(hubert, stefano)\n\nChart(stefano, hubert) and forall x (Chart(x, hubert) -> Chart(hubert, stefano)) -> therefore Chart(hubert, stefano)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The tasia bituminise the delphina. The delphina is loyal. The delphina bituminise the tasia. The delphina bituminise the mitch. The delphina point the tasia. The delphina point the mitch. The delphina underpin the mitch. The mitch is postmortal. The mitch point the tasia. The mitch underpin the tasia. If something underpin the tasia then the tasia underpin the mitch. If something point the tasia and the tasia underpin the mitch then the tasia underpin the delphina. If the delphina bituminise the tasia and the tasia point the delphina then the tasia bituminise the mitch. If the tasia point the mitch then the tasia is postmortal. If something underpin the delphina then the delphina underpin the tasia. If something is loyal and voiced then it point the delphina. The tasia does not visit the mitch.", "logic": "\nBituminise(tasia, delphina)\nLoyal(delphina)\nBituminise(delphina, tasia)\nBituminise(delphina, mitch)\nPoint(delphina, tasia)\nPoint(delphina, mitch)\nUnderpin(delphina, mitch)\nPostmortal(mitch)\nPoint(mitch, tasia)\nUnderpin(mitch, tasia)\nforall x (Underpin(x, tasia) -> Underpin(tasia, mitch))\nforall x (Point(x, tasia) and Underpin(tasia, mitch) -> Underpin(tasia, delphina))\nBituminise(delphina, tasia) and Point(tasia, delphina) -> Bituminise(tasia, mitch)\nPoint(tasia, mitch) -> Postmortal(tasia)\nforall x (Underpin(x, delphina) -> Underpin(delphina, tasia))\nforall x (Loyal(x) and Voiced(x) -> Point(x, delphina))\n\nnot Underpin(tasia, mitch)\n\nUnderpin(mitch, tasia) and forall x (Underpin(x, tasia) -> Underpin(tasia, mitch)) -> therefore Underpin(tasia, mitch)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The micaela junket the ebba. The ebba is gold. The ebba junket the micaela. The ebba junket the tiebold. The ebba reinstall the micaela. The ebba reinstall the tiebold. The ebba exude the tiebold. The tiebold is sixteen. The tiebold reinstall the micaela. The tiebold exude the micaela. If something exude the micaela then the micaela exude the tiebold. If something reinstall the micaela and the micaela exude the tiebold then the micaela exude the ebba. If the ebba junket the micaela and the micaela reinstall the ebba then the micaela junket the tiebold. If the micaela reinstall the tiebold then the micaela is sixteen. If something exude the ebba then the ebba exude the micaela. If something is gold and provoked then it reinstall the ebba. The micaela exude the ebba.", "logic": "\nJunket(micaela, ebba)\nGold(ebba)\nJunket(ebba, micaela)\nJunket(ebba, tiebold)\nReinstall(ebba, micaela)\nReinstall(ebba, tiebold)\nExude(ebba, tiebold)\nSixteen(tiebold)\nReinstall(tiebold, micaela)\nExude(tiebold, micaela)\nforall x (Exude(x, micaela) -> Exude(micaela, tiebold))\nforall x (Reinstall(x, micaela) and Exude(micaela, tiebold) -> Exude(micaela, ebba))\nJunket(ebba, micaela) and Reinstall(micaela, ebba) -> Junket(micaela, tiebold)\nReinstall(micaela, tiebold) -> Sixteen(micaela)\nforall x (Exude(x, ebba) -> Exude(ebba, micaela))\nforall x (Gold(x) and Provoked(x) -> Reinstall(x, ebba))\n\nExude(micaela, ebba)\n\nExude(tiebold, micaela) and forall x (Exude(x, micaela) -> Exude(micaela, tiebold)) -> therefore Exude(micaela, tiebold) Reinstall(ebba, micaela) and Exude(micaela, tiebold) and forall x (Reinstall(x, micaela) and Exude(micaela, tiebold) -> Exude(micaela, ebba)) -> therefore Exude(micaela, ebba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The susy reconquer the davy. The davy is grim. The davy reconquer the susy. The davy reconquer the rem. The davy barbecue the susy. The davy barbecue the rem. The davy associate the rem. The rem is anodyne. The rem barbecue the susy. The rem associate the susy. If something associate the susy then the susy associate the rem. If something barbecue the susy and the susy associate the rem then the susy associate the davy. If the davy reconquer the susy and the susy barbecue the davy then the susy reconquer the rem. If the susy barbecue the rem then the susy is anodyne. If something associate the davy then the davy associate the susy. If something is grim and tireless then it barbecue the davy. The susy does not visit the davy.", "logic": "\nReconquer(susy, davy)\nGrim(davy)\nReconquer(davy, susy)\nReconquer(davy, rem)\nBarbecue(davy, susy)\nBarbecue(davy, rem)\nAssociate(davy, rem)\nAnodyne(rem)\nBarbecue(rem, susy)\nAssociate(rem, susy)\nforall x (Associate(x, susy) -> Associate(susy, rem))\nforall x (Barbecue(x, susy) and Associate(susy, rem) -> Associate(susy, davy))\nReconquer(davy, susy) and Barbecue(susy, davy) -> Reconquer(susy, rem)\nBarbecue(susy, rem) -> Anodyne(susy)\nforall x (Associate(x, davy) -> Associate(davy, susy))\nforall x (Grim(x) and Tireless(x) -> Barbecue(x, davy))\n\nnot Associate(susy, davy)\n\nAssociate(rem, susy) and forall x (Associate(x, susy) -> Associate(susy, rem)) -> therefore Associate(susy, rem) Barbecue(davy, susy) and Associate(susy, rem) and forall x (Barbecue(x, susy) and Associate(susy, rem) -> Associate(susy, davy)) -> therefore Associate(susy, davy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The goose apperceive the sandro. The sandro is uncleared. The sandro apperceive the goose. The sandro apperceive the blanca. The sandro navigate the goose. The sandro navigate the blanca. The sandro nerve the blanca. The blanca is archean. The blanca navigate the goose. The blanca nerve the goose. If something nerve the goose then the goose nerve the blanca. If something navigate the goose and the goose nerve the blanca then the goose nerve the sandro. If the sandro apperceive the goose and the goose navigate the sandro then the goose apperceive the blanca. If the goose navigate the blanca then the goose is archean. If something nerve the sandro then the sandro nerve the goose. If something is uncleared and presumable then it navigate the sandro. The sandro nerve the goose.", "logic": "\nApperceive(goose, sandro)\nUncleared(sandro)\nApperceive(sandro, goose)\nApperceive(sandro, blanca)\nNavigate(sandro, goose)\nNavigate(sandro, blanca)\nNerve(sandro, blanca)\nArchean(blanca)\nNavigate(blanca, goose)\nNerve(blanca, goose)\nforall x (Nerve(x, goose) -> Nerve(goose, blanca))\nforall x (Navigate(x, goose) and Nerve(goose, blanca) -> Nerve(goose, sandro))\nApperceive(sandro, goose) and Navigate(goose, sandro) -> Apperceive(goose, blanca)\nNavigate(goose, blanca) -> Archean(goose)\nforall x (Nerve(x, sandro) -> Nerve(sandro, goose))\nforall x (Uncleared(x) and Presumable(x) -> Navigate(x, sandro))\n\nNerve(sandro, goose)\n\nNerve(blanca, goose) and forall x (Nerve(x, goose) -> Nerve(goose, blanca)) -> therefore Nerve(goose, blanca) Navigate(sandro, goose) and Nerve(goose, blanca) and forall x (Navigate(x, goose) and Nerve(goose, blanca) -> Nerve(goose, sandro)) -> therefore Nerve(goose, sandro) Nerve(goose, sandro) and forall x (Nerve(x, sandro) -> Nerve(sandro, goose)) -> therefore Nerve(sandro, goose)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The corny deactivate the jerrie. The jerrie is blown. The jerrie deactivate the corny. The jerrie deactivate the nikos. The jerrie weigh the corny. The jerrie weigh the nikos. The jerrie nett the nikos. The nikos is select. The nikos weigh the corny. The nikos nett the corny. If something nett the corny then the corny nett the nikos. If something weigh the corny and the corny nett the nikos then the corny nett the jerrie. If the jerrie deactivate the corny and the corny weigh the jerrie then the corny deactivate the nikos. If the corny weigh the nikos then the corny is select. If something nett the jerrie then the jerrie nett the corny. If something is blown and fiducial then it weigh the jerrie. The jerrie does not visit the corny.", "logic": "\nDeactivate(corny, jerrie)\nBlown(jerrie)\nDeactivate(jerrie, corny)\nDeactivate(jerrie, nikos)\nWeigh(jerrie, corny)\nWeigh(jerrie, nikos)\nNett(jerrie, nikos)\nSelect(nikos)\nWeigh(nikos, corny)\nNett(nikos, corny)\nforall x (Nett(x, corny) -> Nett(corny, nikos))\nforall x (Weigh(x, corny) and Nett(corny, nikos) -> Nett(corny, jerrie))\nDeactivate(jerrie, corny) and Weigh(corny, jerrie) -> Deactivate(corny, nikos)\nWeigh(corny, nikos) -> Select(corny)\nforall x (Nett(x, jerrie) -> Nett(jerrie, corny))\nforall x (Blown(x) and Fiducial(x) -> Weigh(x, jerrie))\n\nnot Nett(jerrie, corny)\n\nNett(nikos, corny) and forall x (Nett(x, corny) -> Nett(corny, nikos)) -> therefore Nett(corny, nikos) Weigh(jerrie, corny) and Nett(corny, nikos) and forall x (Weigh(x, corny) and Nett(corny, nikos) -> Nett(corny, jerrie)) -> therefore Nett(corny, jerrie) Nett(corny, jerrie) and forall x (Nett(x, jerrie) -> Nett(jerrie, corny)) -> therefore Nett(jerrie, corny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The jobie root the kaleb. The kaleb is libertine. The kaleb root the jobie. The kaleb root the russell. The kaleb dissuade the jobie. The kaleb dissuade the russell. The kaleb target the russell. The russell is hirsute. The russell dissuade the jobie. The russell target the jobie. If something target the jobie then the jobie target the russell. If something dissuade the jobie and the jobie target the russell then the jobie target the kaleb. If the kaleb root the jobie and the jobie dissuade the kaleb then the jobie root the russell. If the jobie dissuade the russell then the jobie is hirsute. If something target the kaleb then the kaleb target the jobie. If something is libertine and diffident then it dissuade the kaleb. The jobie does not need the russell.", "logic": "\nRoot(jobie, kaleb)\nLibertine(kaleb)\nRoot(kaleb, jobie)\nRoot(kaleb, russell)\nDissuade(kaleb, jobie)\nDissuade(kaleb, russell)\nTarget(kaleb, russell)\nHirsute(russell)\nDissuade(russell, jobie)\nTarget(russell, jobie)\nforall x (Target(x, jobie) -> Target(jobie, russell))\nforall x (Dissuade(x, jobie) and Target(jobie, russell) -> Target(jobie, kaleb))\nRoot(kaleb, jobie) and Dissuade(jobie, kaleb) -> Root(jobie, russell)\nDissuade(jobie, russell) -> Hirsute(jobie)\nforall x (Target(x, kaleb) -> Target(kaleb, jobie))\nforall x (Libertine(x) and Diffident(x) -> Dissuade(x, kaleb))\n\nnot Root(jobie, russell)\n\nRoot(kaleb, jobie) and Dissuade(jobie, kaleb) -> Root(jobie, russell) <- forall x (Libertine(x) and Diffident(x) -> Dissuade(x, kaleb)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The bellina unmake the glyn. The glyn is tantric. The glyn unmake the bellina. The glyn unmake the spiros. The glyn metricize the bellina. The glyn metricize the spiros. The glyn constitute the spiros. The spiros is middle. The spiros metricize the bellina. The spiros constitute the bellina. If something constitute the bellina then the bellina constitute the spiros. If something metricize the bellina and the bellina constitute the spiros then the bellina constitute the glyn. If the glyn unmake the bellina and the bellina metricize the glyn then the bellina unmake the spiros. If the bellina metricize the spiros then the bellina is middle. If something constitute the glyn then the glyn constitute the bellina. If something is tantric and mechanic then it metricize the glyn. The spiros metricize the glyn.", "logic": "\nUnmake(bellina, glyn)\nTantric(glyn)\nUnmake(glyn, bellina)\nUnmake(glyn, spiros)\nMetricize(glyn, bellina)\nMetricize(glyn, spiros)\nConstitute(glyn, spiros)\nMiddle(spiros)\nMetricize(spiros, bellina)\nConstitute(spiros, bellina)\nforall x (Constitute(x, bellina) -> Constitute(bellina, spiros))\nforall x (Metricize(x, bellina) and Constitute(bellina, spiros) -> Constitute(bellina, glyn))\nUnmake(glyn, bellina) and Metricize(bellina, glyn) -> Unmake(bellina, spiros)\nMetricize(bellina, spiros) -> Middle(bellina)\nforall x (Constitute(x, glyn) -> Constitute(glyn, bellina))\nforall x (Tantric(x) and Mechanic(x) -> Metricize(x, glyn))\n\nMetricize(spiros, glyn)\n\nforall x (Tantric(x) and Mechanic(x) -> Metricize(x, glyn)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The sammy foreclose the dulcine. The dulcine is goalless. The dulcine foreclose the sammy. The dulcine foreclose the bennett. The dulcine automobile the sammy. The dulcine automobile the bennett. The dulcine outweigh the bennett. The bennett is mocking. The bennett automobile the sammy. The bennett outweigh the sammy. If something outweigh the sammy then the sammy outweigh the bennett. If something automobile the sammy and the sammy outweigh the bennett then the sammy outweigh the dulcine. If the dulcine foreclose the sammy and the sammy automobile the dulcine then the sammy foreclose the bennett. If the sammy automobile the bennett then the sammy is mocking. If something outweigh the dulcine then the dulcine outweigh the sammy. If something is goalless and brushlike then it automobile the dulcine. The sammy does not see the dulcine.", "logic": "\nForeclose(sammy, dulcine)\nGoalless(dulcine)\nForeclose(dulcine, sammy)\nForeclose(dulcine, bennett)\nAutomobile(dulcine, sammy)\nAutomobile(dulcine, bennett)\nOutweigh(dulcine, bennett)\nMocking(bennett)\nAutomobile(bennett, sammy)\nOutweigh(bennett, sammy)\nforall x (Outweigh(x, sammy) -> Outweigh(sammy, bennett))\nforall x (Automobile(x, sammy) and Outweigh(sammy, bennett) -> Outweigh(sammy, dulcine))\nForeclose(dulcine, sammy) and Automobile(sammy, dulcine) -> Foreclose(sammy, bennett)\nAutomobile(sammy, bennett) -> Mocking(sammy)\nforall x (Outweigh(x, dulcine) -> Outweigh(dulcine, sammy))\nforall x (Goalless(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Automobile(x, dulcine))\n\nnot Automobile(sammy, dulcine)\n\nforall x (Goalless(x) and Brushlike(x) -> Automobile(x, dulcine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The maryanne endeavour the atalanta. The atalanta is serrate. The atalanta endeavour the maryanne. The atalanta endeavour the yale. The atalanta respite the maryanne. The atalanta respite the yale. The atalanta back the yale. The yale is frisian. The yale respite the maryanne. The yale back the maryanne. If something back the maryanne then the maryanne back the yale. If something respite the maryanne and the maryanne back the yale then the maryanne back the atalanta. If the atalanta endeavour the maryanne and the maryanne respite the atalanta then the maryanne endeavour the yale. If the maryanne respite the yale then the maryanne is frisian. If something back the atalanta then the atalanta back the maryanne. If something is serrate and trabeated then it respite the atalanta. The maryanne is frisian.", "logic": "\nEndeavour(maryanne, atalanta)\nSerrate(atalanta)\nEndeavour(atalanta, maryanne)\nEndeavour(atalanta, yale)\nRespite(atalanta, maryanne)\nRespite(atalanta, yale)\nBack(atalanta, yale)\nFrisian(yale)\nRespite(yale, maryanne)\nBack(yale, maryanne)\nforall x (Back(x, maryanne) -> Back(maryanne, yale))\nforall x (Respite(x, maryanne) and Back(maryanne, yale) -> Back(maryanne, atalanta))\nEndeavour(atalanta, maryanne) and Respite(maryanne, atalanta) -> Endeavour(maryanne, yale)\nRespite(maryanne, yale) -> Frisian(maryanne)\nforall x (Back(x, atalanta) -> Back(atalanta, maryanne))\nforall x (Serrate(x) and Trabeated(x) -> Respite(x, atalanta))\n\nFrisian(maryanne)\n\nRespite(maryanne, yale) -> Frisian(maryanne) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The annamari circumvent the steffane. The steffane is anodal. The steffane circumvent the annamari. The steffane circumvent the katie. The steffane swat the annamari. The steffane swat the katie. The steffane maximise the katie. The katie is soleless. The katie swat the annamari. The katie maximise the annamari. If something maximise the annamari then the annamari maximise the katie. If something swat the annamari and the annamari maximise the katie then the annamari maximise the steffane. If the steffane circumvent the annamari and the annamari swat the steffane then the annamari circumvent the katie. If the annamari swat the katie then the annamari is soleless. If something maximise the steffane then the steffane maximise the annamari. If something is anodal and cretinous then it swat the steffane. The katie is not big.", "logic": "\nCircumvent(annamari, steffane)\nAnodal(steffane)\nCircumvent(steffane, annamari)\nCircumvent(steffane, katie)\nSwat(steffane, annamari)\nSwat(steffane, katie)\nMaximise(steffane, katie)\nSoleless(katie)\nSwat(katie, annamari)\nMaximise(katie, annamari)\nforall x (Maximise(x, annamari) -> Maximise(annamari, katie))\nforall x (Swat(x, annamari) and Maximise(annamari, katie) -> Maximise(annamari, steffane))\nCircumvent(steffane, annamari) and Swat(annamari, steffane) -> Circumvent(annamari, katie)\nSwat(annamari, katie) -> Soleless(annamari)\nforall x (Maximise(x, steffane) -> Maximise(steffane, annamari))\nforall x (Anodal(x) and Cretinous(x) -> Swat(x, steffane))\n\nnot Big(katie)\n\nnot Big(katie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The vick concern the moreen. The moreen is cheesy. The moreen concern the vick. The moreen concern the kennedy. The moreen vowelise the vick. The moreen vowelise the kennedy. The moreen seel the kennedy. The kennedy is homely. The kennedy vowelise the vick. The kennedy seel the vick. If something seel the vick then the vick seel the kennedy. If something vowelise the vick and the vick seel the kennedy then the vick seel the moreen. If the moreen concern the vick and the vick vowelise the moreen then the vick concern the kennedy. If the vick vowelise the kennedy then the vick is homely. If something seel the moreen then the moreen seel the vick. If something is cheesy and dyadic then it vowelise the moreen. The kennedy seel the kennedy.", "logic": "\nConcern(vick, moreen)\nCheesy(moreen)\nConcern(moreen, vick)\nConcern(moreen, kennedy)\nVowelise(moreen, vick)\nVowelise(moreen, kennedy)\nSeel(moreen, kennedy)\nHomely(kennedy)\nVowelise(kennedy, vick)\nSeel(kennedy, vick)\nforall x (Seel(x, vick) -> Seel(vick, kennedy))\nforall x (Vowelise(x, vick) and Seel(vick, kennedy) -> Seel(vick, moreen))\nConcern(moreen, vick) and Vowelise(vick, moreen) -> Concern(vick, kennedy)\nVowelise(vick, kennedy) -> Homely(vick)\nforall x (Seel(x, moreen) -> Seel(moreen, vick))\nforall x (Cheesy(x) and Dyadic(x) -> Vowelise(x, moreen))\n\nSeel(kennedy, kennedy)\n\nSeel(kennedy, kennedy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The claresta boycott the eben. The eben is cacophonic. The eben boycott the claresta. The eben boycott the shira. The eben snaffle the claresta. The eben snaffle the shira. The eben discontent the shira. The shira is gaelic. The shira snaffle the claresta. The shira discontent the claresta. If something discontent the claresta then the claresta discontent the shira. If something snaffle the claresta and the claresta discontent the shira then the claresta discontent the eben. If the eben boycott the claresta and the claresta snaffle the eben then the claresta boycott the shira. If the claresta snaffle the shira then the claresta is gaelic. If something discontent the eben then the eben discontent the claresta. If something is cacophonic and belittling then it snaffle the eben. The claresta does not see the claresta.", "logic": "\nBoycott(claresta, eben)\nCacophonic(eben)\nBoycott(eben, claresta)\nBoycott(eben, shira)\nSnaffle(eben, claresta)\nSnaffle(eben, shira)\nDiscontent(eben, shira)\nGaelic(shira)\nSnaffle(shira, claresta)\nDiscontent(shira, claresta)\nforall x (Discontent(x, claresta) -> Discontent(claresta, shira))\nforall x (Snaffle(x, claresta) and Discontent(claresta, shira) -> Discontent(claresta, eben))\nBoycott(eben, claresta) and Snaffle(claresta, eben) -> Boycott(claresta, shira)\nSnaffle(claresta, shira) -> Gaelic(claresta)\nforall x (Discontent(x, eben) -> Discontent(eben, claresta))\nforall x (Cacophonic(x) and Belittling(x) -> Snaffle(x, eben))\n\nnot Snaffle(claresta, claresta)\n\nnot Snaffle(claresta, claresta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "The teodor unmask the ritchie. The ritchie is chummy. The ritchie unmask the teodor. The ritchie unmask the nerti. The ritchie canton the teodor. The ritchie canton the nerti. The ritchie dismiss the nerti. The nerti is huffy. The nerti canton the teodor. The nerti dismiss the teodor. If something dismiss the teodor then the teodor dismiss the nerti. If something canton the teodor and the teodor dismiss the nerti then the teodor dismiss the ritchie. If the ritchie unmask the teodor and the teodor canton the ritchie then the teodor unmask the nerti. If the teodor canton the nerti then the teodor is huffy. If something dismiss the ritchie then the ritchie dismiss the teodor. If something is chummy and allopathic then it canton the ritchie. The ritchie is big.", "logic": "\nUnmask(teodor, ritchie)\nChummy(ritchie)\nUnmask(ritchie, teodor)\nUnmask(ritchie, nerti)\nCanton(ritchie, teodor)\nCanton(ritchie, nerti)\nDismiss(ritchie, nerti)\nHuffy(nerti)\nCanton(nerti, teodor)\nDismiss(nerti, teodor)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, teodor) -> Dismiss(teodor, nerti))\nforall x (Canton(x, teodor) and Dismiss(teodor, nerti) -> Dismiss(teodor, ritchie))\nUnmask(ritchie, teodor) and Canton(teodor, ritchie) -> Unmask(teodor, nerti)\nCanton(teodor, nerti) -> Huffy(teodor)\nforall x (Dismiss(x, ritchie) -> Dismiss(ritchie, teodor))\nforall x (Chummy(x) and Allopathic(x) -> Canton(x, ritchie))\n\nBig(ritchie)\n\nBig(ritchie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-125"} {"premises": "Luanna is dogmatical. Luanna is subacute. Luanna is genitive. If someone is violent then they are genitive. White, dogmatical people are genitive. Luanna is dogmatical.", "logic": "\nDogmatical(luanna)\nSubacute(luanna)\nGenitive(luanna)\nforall x (Violent(x) -> Genitive(x))\nforall x (Violent(x) and Dogmatical(x) -> Genitive(x))\n\nDogmatical(luanna)\n\ntherefore Dogmatical(luanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1021"} {"premises": "Mairead is punic. Mairead is kechuan. Mairead is boric. If someone is repand then they are boric. White, punic people are boric. Mairead is not boric.", "logic": "\nPunic(mairead)\nKechuan(mairead)\nBoric(mairead)\nforall x (Repand(x) -> Boric(x))\nforall x (Repand(x) and Punic(x) -> Boric(x))\n\nnot Boric(mairead)\n\ntherefore Boric(mairead)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1021"} {"premises": "Felicia is endogamous. Felicia is outdoor. Felicia is cruciate. If someone is unframed then they are cruciate. White, endogamous people are cruciate. Felicia is not furry.", "logic": "\nEndogamous(felicia)\nOutdoor(felicia)\nCruciate(felicia)\nforall x (Unframed(x) -> Cruciate(x))\nforall x (Unframed(x) and Endogamous(x) -> Cruciate(x))\n\nnot Furry(felicia)\n\nnot Furry(felicia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1021"} {"premises": "Tiffani is bovine. Tiffani is unicuspid. Tiffani is contraband. If someone is stainable then they are contraband. White, bovine people are contraband. Tiffani is nice.", "logic": "\nBovine(tiffani)\nUnicuspid(tiffani)\nContraband(tiffani)\nforall x (Stainable(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Stainable(x) and Bovine(x) -> Contraband(x))\n\nNice(tiffani)\n\nNice(tiffani) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1021"} {"premises": "Mervin is inducive. Ximenez is hurtful. Pryce is stooped. If someone is stooped then they are dietetical. All stooped, dietetical people are acetose. All stooped, monestrous people are nonskid. If someone is dietetical and hurtful then they are acetose. If Pryce is nonskid and Pryce is stooped then Pryce is monestrous. If someone is acetose and stooped then they are monestrous. If someone is nonskid and dietetical then they are inducive. If someone is nonskid then they are inducive. Mervin is inducive.", "logic": "\nInducive(mervin)\nHurtful(ximenez)\nStooped(pryce)\nforall x (Stooped(x) -> Dietetical(x))\nforall x (Stooped(x) and Dietetical(x) -> Acetose(x))\nforall x (Stooped(x) and Monestrous(x) -> Nonskid(x))\nforall x (Dietetical(x) and Hurtful(x) -> Acetose(x))\nNonskid(pryce) and Stooped(pryce) -> Monestrous(pryce)\nforall x (Acetose(x) and Stooped(x) -> Monestrous(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) and Dietetical(x) -> Inducive(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Inducive(x))\n\nInducive(mervin)\n\ntherefore Inducive(mervin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Carly is lidless. Davie is microbic. Hayward is hatched. If someone is hatched then they are stuporous. All hatched, stuporous people are scalelike. All hatched, forgotten people are damaged. If someone is stuporous and microbic then they are scalelike. If Hayward is damaged and Hayward is hatched then Hayward is forgotten. If someone is scalelike and hatched then they are forgotten. If someone is damaged and stuporous then they are lidless. If someone is damaged then they are lidless. Hayward is not hatched.", "logic": "\nLidless(carly)\nMicrobic(davie)\nHatched(hayward)\nforall x (Hatched(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Hatched(x) and Stuporous(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Hatched(x) and Forgotten(x) -> Damaged(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) and Microbic(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nDamaged(hayward) and Hatched(hayward) -> Forgotten(hayward)\nforall x (Scalelike(x) and Hatched(x) -> Forgotten(x))\nforall x (Damaged(x) and Stuporous(x) -> Lidless(x))\nforall x (Damaged(x) -> Lidless(x))\n\nnot Hatched(hayward)\n\ntherefore Hatched(hayward)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Enya is languid. Mortie is scythian. Vilhelm is showy. If someone is showy then they are surrounded. All showy, surrounded people are upstart. All showy, sterling people are numeric. If someone is surrounded and scythian then they are upstart. If Vilhelm is numeric and Vilhelm is showy then Vilhelm is sterling. If someone is upstart and showy then they are sterling. If someone is numeric and surrounded then they are languid. If someone is numeric then they are languid. Vilhelm is surrounded.", "logic": "\nLanguid(enya)\nScythian(mortie)\nShowy(vilhelm)\nforall x (Showy(x) -> Surrounded(x))\nforall x (Showy(x) and Surrounded(x) -> Upstart(x))\nforall x (Showy(x) and Sterling(x) -> Numeric(x))\nforall x (Surrounded(x) and Scythian(x) -> Upstart(x))\nNumeric(vilhelm) and Showy(vilhelm) -> Sterling(vilhelm)\nforall x (Upstart(x) and Showy(x) -> Sterling(x))\nforall x (Numeric(x) and Surrounded(x) -> Languid(x))\nforall x (Numeric(x) -> Languid(x))\n\nSurrounded(vilhelm)\n\nShowy(vilhelm) and forall x (Showy(x) -> Surrounded(x)) -> therefore Surrounded(vilhelm)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Arabelle is lemony. Geraldo is monetary. Paule is cogent. If someone is cogent then they are unavowed. All cogent, unavowed people are laurelled. All cogent, nonnomadic people are myeloid. If someone is unavowed and monetary then they are laurelled. If Paule is myeloid and Paule is cogent then Paule is nonnomadic. If someone is laurelled and cogent then they are nonnomadic. If someone is myeloid and unavowed then they are lemony. If someone is myeloid then they are lemony. Paule is not unavowed.", "logic": "\nLemony(arabelle)\nMonetary(geraldo)\nCogent(paule)\nforall x (Cogent(x) -> Unavowed(x))\nforall x (Cogent(x) and Unavowed(x) -> Laurelled(x))\nforall x (Cogent(x) and Nonnomadic(x) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Unavowed(x) and Monetary(x) -> Laurelled(x))\nMyeloid(paule) and Cogent(paule) -> Nonnomadic(paule)\nforall x (Laurelled(x) and Cogent(x) -> Nonnomadic(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) and Unavowed(x) -> Lemony(x))\nforall x (Myeloid(x) -> Lemony(x))\n\nnot Unavowed(paule)\n\nCogent(paule) and forall x (Cogent(x) -> Unavowed(x)) -> therefore Unavowed(paule)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Gavrielle is overarm. Salvatore is polygamous. Luisa is vestal. If someone is vestal then they are unsent. All vestal, unsent people are hawkish. All vestal, enolic people are unhewn. If someone is unsent and polygamous then they are hawkish. If Luisa is unhewn and Luisa is vestal then Luisa is enolic. If someone is hawkish and vestal then they are enolic. If someone is unhewn and unsent then they are overarm. If someone is unhewn then they are overarm. Luisa is hawkish.", "logic": "\nOverarm(gavrielle)\nPolygamous(salvatore)\nVestal(luisa)\nforall x (Vestal(x) -> Unsent(x))\nforall x (Vestal(x) and Unsent(x) -> Hawkish(x))\nforall x (Vestal(x) and Enolic(x) -> Unhewn(x))\nforall x (Unsent(x) and Polygamous(x) -> Hawkish(x))\nUnhewn(luisa) and Vestal(luisa) -> Enolic(luisa)\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and Vestal(x) -> Enolic(x))\nforall x (Unhewn(x) and Unsent(x) -> Overarm(x))\nforall x (Unhewn(x) -> Overarm(x))\n\nHawkish(luisa)\n\nVestal(luisa) and forall x (Vestal(x) -> Unsent(x)) -> therefore Unsent(luisa) Vestal(luisa) and Unsent(luisa) and forall x (Vestal(x) and Unsent(x) -> Hawkish(x)) -> therefore Hawkish(luisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Hanan is rummy. Kermit is anterior. Cyb is ptolemaic. If someone is ptolemaic then they are hardheaded. All ptolemaic, hardheaded people are humbling. All ptolemaic, visionary people are minimal. If someone is hardheaded and anterior then they are humbling. If Cyb is minimal and Cyb is ptolemaic then Cyb is visionary. If someone is humbling and ptolemaic then they are visionary. If someone is minimal and hardheaded then they are rummy. If someone is minimal then they are rummy. Cyb is not humbling.", "logic": "\nRummy(hanan)\nAnterior(kermit)\nPtolemaic(cyb)\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Hardheaded(x))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Hardheaded(x) -> Humbling(x))\nforall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Visionary(x) -> Minimal(x))\nforall x (Hardheaded(x) and Anterior(x) -> Humbling(x))\nMinimal(cyb) and Ptolemaic(cyb) -> Visionary(cyb)\nforall x (Humbling(x) and Ptolemaic(x) -> Visionary(x))\nforall x (Minimal(x) and Hardheaded(x) -> Rummy(x))\nforall x (Minimal(x) -> Rummy(x))\n\nnot Humbling(cyb)\n\nPtolemaic(cyb) and forall x (Ptolemaic(x) -> Hardheaded(x)) -> therefore Hardheaded(cyb) Ptolemaic(cyb) and Hardheaded(cyb) and forall x (Ptolemaic(x) and Hardheaded(x) -> Humbling(x)) -> therefore Humbling(cyb)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Leta is intense. Enrica is patriotic. Helyn is electronic. If someone is electronic then they are endocrinal. All electronic, endocrinal people are unhewn. All electronic, shaped people are bridgeable. If someone is endocrinal and patriotic then they are unhewn. If Helyn is bridgeable and Helyn is electronic then Helyn is shaped. If someone is unhewn and electronic then they are shaped. If someone is bridgeable and endocrinal then they are intense. If someone is bridgeable then they are intense. Helyn is shaped.", "logic": "\nIntense(leta)\nPatriotic(enrica)\nElectronic(helyn)\nforall x (Electronic(x) -> Endocrinal(x))\nforall x (Electronic(x) and Endocrinal(x) -> Unhewn(x))\nforall x (Electronic(x) and Shaped(x) -> Bridgeable(x))\nforall x (Endocrinal(x) and Patriotic(x) -> Unhewn(x))\nBridgeable(helyn) and Electronic(helyn) -> Shaped(helyn)\nforall x (Unhewn(x) and Electronic(x) -> Shaped(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) and Endocrinal(x) -> Intense(x))\nforall x (Bridgeable(x) -> Intense(x))\n\nShaped(helyn)\n\nElectronic(helyn) and forall x (Electronic(x) -> Endocrinal(x)) -> therefore Endocrinal(helyn) Electronic(helyn) and Endocrinal(helyn) and forall x (Electronic(x) and Endocrinal(x) -> Unhewn(x)) -> therefore Unhewn(helyn) Unhewn(helyn) and Electronic(helyn) and forall x (Unhewn(x) and Electronic(x) -> Shaped(x)) -> therefore Shaped(helyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Sada is manichaean. Vivienne is pappose. Moina is oncoming. If someone is oncoming then they are churchly. All oncoming, churchly people are outermost. All oncoming, hypotonic people are visualised. If someone is churchly and pappose then they are outermost. If Moina is visualised and Moina is oncoming then Moina is hypotonic. If someone is outermost and oncoming then they are hypotonic. If someone is visualised and churchly then they are manichaean. If someone is visualised then they are manichaean. Moina is not hypotonic.", "logic": "\nManichaean(sada)\nPappose(vivienne)\nOncoming(moina)\nforall x (Oncoming(x) -> Churchly(x))\nforall x (Oncoming(x) and Churchly(x) -> Outermost(x))\nforall x (Oncoming(x) and Hypotonic(x) -> Visualised(x))\nforall x (Churchly(x) and Pappose(x) -> Outermost(x))\nVisualised(moina) and Oncoming(moina) -> Hypotonic(moina)\nforall x (Outermost(x) and Oncoming(x) -> Hypotonic(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) and Churchly(x) -> Manichaean(x))\nforall x (Visualised(x) -> Manichaean(x))\n\nnot Hypotonic(moina)\n\nOncoming(moina) and forall x (Oncoming(x) -> Churchly(x)) -> therefore Churchly(moina) Oncoming(moina) and Churchly(moina) and forall x (Oncoming(x) and Churchly(x) -> Outermost(x)) -> therefore Outermost(moina) Outermost(moina) and Oncoming(moina) and forall x (Outermost(x) and Oncoming(x) -> Hypotonic(x)) -> therefore Hypotonic(moina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Raj is malawian. Roarke is nebulose. Donetta is untied. If someone is untied then they are carnation. All untied, carnation people are austere. All untied, anaglyphic people are sequential. If someone is carnation and nebulose then they are austere. If Donetta is sequential and Donetta is untied then Donetta is anaglyphic. If someone is austere and untied then they are anaglyphic. If someone is sequential and carnation then they are malawian. If someone is sequential then they are malawian. Roarke is not malawian.", "logic": "\nMalawian(raj)\nNebulose(roarke)\nUntied(donetta)\nforall x (Untied(x) -> Carnation(x))\nforall x (Untied(x) and Carnation(x) -> Austere(x))\nforall x (Untied(x) and Anaglyphic(x) -> Sequential(x))\nforall x (Carnation(x) and Nebulose(x) -> Austere(x))\nSequential(donetta) and Untied(donetta) -> Anaglyphic(donetta)\nforall x (Austere(x) and Untied(x) -> Anaglyphic(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Carnation(x) -> Malawian(x))\nforall x (Sequential(x) -> Malawian(x))\n\nnot Malawian(roarke)\n\nforall x (Sequential(x) and Carnation(x) -> Malawian(x)) <- forall x (Untied(x) and Anaglyphic(x) -> Sequential(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Devon is irritable. Lesli is atheist. Roth is propellent. If someone is propellent then they are shrunken. All propellent, shrunken people are elaborated. All propellent, unthought people are enolic. If someone is shrunken and atheist then they are elaborated. If Roth is enolic and Roth is propellent then Roth is unthought. If someone is elaborated and propellent then they are unthought. If someone is enolic and shrunken then they are irritable. If someone is enolic then they are irritable. Lesli is unthought.", "logic": "\nIrritable(devon)\nAtheist(lesli)\nPropellent(roth)\nforall x (Propellent(x) -> Shrunken(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Shrunken(x) -> Elaborated(x))\nforall x (Propellent(x) and Unthought(x) -> Enolic(x))\nforall x (Shrunken(x) and Atheist(x) -> Elaborated(x))\nEnolic(roth) and Propellent(roth) -> Unthought(roth)\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and Propellent(x) -> Unthought(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) and Shrunken(x) -> Irritable(x))\nforall x (Enolic(x) -> Irritable(x))\n\nUnthought(lesli)\n\nforall x (Elaborated(x) and Propellent(x) -> Unthought(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Locke is owing. Jordana is mastoidal. Ulrich is rewardful. If someone is rewardful then they are extendible. All rewardful, extendible people are unchaste. All rewardful, dependable people are lucid. If someone is extendible and mastoidal then they are unchaste. If Ulrich is lucid and Ulrich is rewardful then Ulrich is dependable. If someone is unchaste and rewardful then they are dependable. If someone is lucid and extendible then they are owing. If someone is lucid then they are owing. Jordana is not lucid.", "logic": "\nOwing(locke)\nMastoidal(jordana)\nRewardful(ulrich)\nforall x (Rewardful(x) -> Extendible(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) and Extendible(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nforall x (Rewardful(x) and Dependable(x) -> Lucid(x))\nforall x (Extendible(x) and Mastoidal(x) -> Unchaste(x))\nLucid(ulrich) and Rewardful(ulrich) -> Dependable(ulrich)\nforall x (Unchaste(x) and Rewardful(x) -> Dependable(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) and Extendible(x) -> Owing(x))\nforall x (Lucid(x) -> Owing(x))\n\nnot Lucid(jordana)\n\nforall x (Rewardful(x) and Dependable(x) -> Lucid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Donni is fogged. Mason is crippling. Vicki is lithic. If someone is lithic then they are shaved. All lithic, shaved people are swell. All lithic, untreated people are aortic. If someone is shaved and crippling then they are swell. If Vicki is aortic and Vicki is lithic then Vicki is untreated. If someone is swell and lithic then they are untreated. If someone is aortic and shaved then they are fogged. If someone is aortic then they are fogged. Mason is shaved.", "logic": "\nFogged(donni)\nCrippling(mason)\nLithic(vicki)\nforall x (Lithic(x) -> Shaved(x))\nforall x (Lithic(x) and Shaved(x) -> Swell(x))\nforall x (Lithic(x) and Untreated(x) -> Aortic(x))\nforall x (Shaved(x) and Crippling(x) -> Swell(x))\nAortic(vicki) and Lithic(vicki) -> Untreated(vicki)\nforall x (Swell(x) and Lithic(x) -> Untreated(x))\nforall x (Aortic(x) and Shaved(x) -> Fogged(x))\nforall x (Aortic(x) -> Fogged(x))\n\nShaved(mason)\n\nforall x (Lithic(x) -> Shaved(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Noble is planted. Lyle is areolar. Colleen is scrappy. If someone is scrappy then they are digital. All scrappy, digital people are hard. All scrappy, gentile people are diastolic. If someone is digital and areolar then they are hard. If Colleen is diastolic and Colleen is scrappy then Colleen is gentile. If someone is hard and scrappy then they are gentile. If someone is diastolic and digital then they are planted. If someone is diastolic then they are planted. Colleen is not areolar.", "logic": "\nPlanted(noble)\nAreolar(lyle)\nScrappy(colleen)\nforall x (Scrappy(x) -> Digital(x))\nforall x (Scrappy(x) and Digital(x) -> Hard(x))\nforall x (Scrappy(x) and Gentile(x) -> Diastolic(x))\nforall x (Digital(x) and Areolar(x) -> Hard(x))\nDiastolic(colleen) and Scrappy(colleen) -> Gentile(colleen)\nforall x (Hard(x) and Scrappy(x) -> Gentile(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Digital(x) -> Planted(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) -> Planted(x))\n\nnot Areolar(colleen)\n\nnot Areolar(colleen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Sky is hornless. Alia is slight. Leonie is bicyclic. If someone is bicyclic then they are expositive. All bicyclic, expositive people are prone. All bicyclic, maculate people are agamic. If someone is expositive and slight then they are prone. If Leonie is agamic and Leonie is bicyclic then Leonie is maculate. If someone is prone and bicyclic then they are maculate. If someone is agamic and expositive then they are hornless. If someone is agamic then they are hornless. Sky is slight.", "logic": "\nHornless(sky)\nSlight(alia)\nBicyclic(leonie)\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) -> Expositive(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Expositive(x) -> Prone(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Maculate(x) -> Agamic(x))\nforall x (Expositive(x) and Slight(x) -> Prone(x))\nAgamic(leonie) and Bicyclic(leonie) -> Maculate(leonie)\nforall x (Prone(x) and Bicyclic(x) -> Maculate(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) and Expositive(x) -> Hornless(x))\nforall x (Agamic(x) -> Hornless(x))\n\nSlight(sky)\n\nSlight(sky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Allys is shopsoiled. Brandon is sweeping. Benn is organised. If someone is organised then they are disturbing. All organised, disturbing people are monatomic. All organised, stripped people are familial. If someone is disturbing and sweeping then they are monatomic. If Benn is familial and Benn is organised then Benn is stripped. If someone is monatomic and organised then they are stripped. If someone is familial and disturbing then they are shopsoiled. If someone is familial then they are shopsoiled. Brandon is not organised.", "logic": "\nShopsoiled(allys)\nSweeping(brandon)\nOrganised(benn)\nforall x (Organised(x) -> Disturbing(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) and Disturbing(x) -> Monatomic(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) and Stripped(x) -> Familial(x))\nforall x (Disturbing(x) and Sweeping(x) -> Monatomic(x))\nFamilial(benn) and Organised(benn) -> Stripped(benn)\nforall x (Monatomic(x) and Organised(x) -> Stripped(x))\nforall x (Familial(x) and Disturbing(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\nforall x (Familial(x) -> Shopsoiled(x))\n\nnot Organised(brandon)\n\nnot Organised(brandon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Merci is panegyric. Elayne is evanescent. Nickey is reasoning. If someone is reasoning then they are provident. All reasoning, provident people are temporary. All reasoning, reduced people are eager. If someone is provident and evanescent then they are temporary. If Nickey is eager and Nickey is reasoning then Nickey is reduced. If someone is temporary and reasoning then they are reduced. If someone is eager and provident then they are panegyric. If someone is eager then they are panegyric. Merci is reasoning.", "logic": "\nPanegyric(merci)\nEvanescent(elayne)\nReasoning(nickey)\nforall x (Reasoning(x) -> Provident(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) and Provident(x) -> Temporary(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) and Reduced(x) -> Eager(x))\nforall x (Provident(x) and Evanescent(x) -> Temporary(x))\nEager(nickey) and Reasoning(nickey) -> Reduced(nickey)\nforall x (Temporary(x) and Reasoning(x) -> Reduced(x))\nforall x (Eager(x) and Provident(x) -> Panegyric(x))\nforall x (Eager(x) -> Panegyric(x))\n\nReasoning(merci)\n\nReasoning(merci) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-189"} {"premises": "Lesley is beetle. Lesley is answerable. Lesley is postexilic. Lesley is dissilient. Lesley is bulky. Lesley is perfected. Brande is beetle. Brande is unexcelled. Brande is answerable. Brande is dissilient. Brande is perfected. Gustave is answerable. Gustave is postexilic. Gustave is dissilient. Gustave is perfected. If something is dissilient and bulky then it is postexilic. If something is unexcelled then it is beetle. Round things are answerable. Big, postexilic things are perfected. If Brande is bulky then Brande is beetle. All postexilic things are unexcelled. If something is unexcelled then it is perfected. All beetle things are bulky. Lesley is answerable.", "logic": "\nBeetle(lesley)\nAnswerable(lesley)\nPostexilic(lesley)\nDissilient(lesley)\nBulky(lesley)\nPerfected(lesley)\nBeetle(brande)\nUnexcelled(brande)\nAnswerable(brande)\nDissilient(brande)\nPerfected(brande)\nAnswerable(gustave)\nPostexilic(gustave)\nDissilient(gustave)\nPerfected(gustave)\nforall x (Dissilient(x) and Bulky(x) -> Postexilic(x))\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Beetle(x))\nforall x (Perfected(x) -> Answerable(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x) and Postexilic(x) -> Perfected(x))\nBulky(brande) -> Beetle(brande)\nforall x (Postexilic(x) -> Unexcelled(x))\nforall x (Unexcelled(x) -> Perfected(x))\nforall x (Beetle(x) -> Bulky(x))\n\nAnswerable(lesley)\n\ntherefore Answerable(lesley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Kevyn is stuporous. Kevyn is arduous. Kevyn is deceitful. Kevyn is anabatic. Kevyn is outfitted. Kevyn is outflowing. Hattie is stuporous. Hattie is excrescent. Hattie is arduous. Hattie is anabatic. Hattie is outflowing. Linnet is arduous. Linnet is deceitful. Linnet is anabatic. Linnet is outflowing. If something is anabatic and outfitted then it is deceitful. If something is excrescent then it is stuporous. Round things are arduous. Big, deceitful things are outflowing. If Hattie is outfitted then Hattie is stuporous. All deceitful things are excrescent. If something is excrescent then it is outflowing. All stuporous things are outfitted. Kevyn is not stuporous.", "logic": "\nStuporous(kevyn)\nArduous(kevyn)\nDeceitful(kevyn)\nAnabatic(kevyn)\nOutfitted(kevyn)\nOutflowing(kevyn)\nStuporous(hattie)\nExcrescent(hattie)\nArduous(hattie)\nAnabatic(hattie)\nOutflowing(hattie)\nArduous(linnet)\nDeceitful(linnet)\nAnabatic(linnet)\nOutflowing(linnet)\nforall x (Anabatic(x) and Outfitted(x) -> Deceitful(x))\nforall x (Excrescent(x) -> Stuporous(x))\nforall x (Outflowing(x) -> Arduous(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) and Deceitful(x) -> Outflowing(x))\nOutfitted(hattie) -> Stuporous(hattie)\nforall x (Deceitful(x) -> Excrescent(x))\nforall x (Excrescent(x) -> Outflowing(x))\nforall x (Stuporous(x) -> Outfitted(x))\n\nnot Stuporous(kevyn)\n\ntherefore Stuporous(kevyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Forrest is prodigious. Forrest is undimmed. Forrest is sliced. Forrest is enteral. Forrest is hominian. Forrest is moire. Karola is prodigious. Karola is vapourised. Karola is undimmed. Karola is enteral. Karola is moire. Hynda is undimmed. Hynda is sliced. Hynda is enteral. Hynda is moire. If something is enteral and hominian then it is sliced. If something is vapourised then it is prodigious. Round things are undimmed. Big, sliced things are moire. If Karola is hominian then Karola is prodigious. All sliced things are vapourised. If something is vapourised then it is moire. All prodigious things are hominian. Karola is hominian.", "logic": "\nProdigious(forrest)\nUndimmed(forrest)\nSliced(forrest)\nEnteral(forrest)\nHominian(forrest)\nMoire(forrest)\nProdigious(karola)\nVapourised(karola)\nUndimmed(karola)\nEnteral(karola)\nMoire(karola)\nUndimmed(hynda)\nSliced(hynda)\nEnteral(hynda)\nMoire(hynda)\nforall x (Enteral(x) and Hominian(x) -> Sliced(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Prodigious(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) -> Undimmed(x))\nforall x (Prodigious(x) and Sliced(x) -> Moire(x))\nHominian(karola) -> Prodigious(karola)\nforall x (Sliced(x) -> Vapourised(x))\nforall x (Vapourised(x) -> Moire(x))\nforall x (Prodigious(x) -> Hominian(x))\n\nHominian(karola)\n\nProdigious(karola) and forall x (Prodigious(x) -> Hominian(x)) -> therefore Hominian(karola)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Petra is biennial. Petra is profitless. Petra is travelled. Petra is treacly. Petra is doubtful. Petra is proofed. Englebert is biennial. Englebert is pubescent. Englebert is profitless. Englebert is treacly. Englebert is proofed. Latrena is profitless. Latrena is travelled. Latrena is treacly. Latrena is proofed. If something is treacly and doubtful then it is travelled. If something is pubescent then it is biennial. Round things are profitless. Big, travelled things are proofed. If Englebert is doubtful then Englebert is biennial. All travelled things are pubescent. If something is pubescent then it is proofed. All biennial things are doubtful. Latrena is not pubescent.", "logic": "\nBiennial(petra)\nProfitless(petra)\nTravelled(petra)\nTreacly(petra)\nDoubtful(petra)\nProofed(petra)\nBiennial(englebert)\nPubescent(englebert)\nProfitless(englebert)\nTreacly(englebert)\nProofed(englebert)\nProfitless(latrena)\nTravelled(latrena)\nTreacly(latrena)\nProofed(latrena)\nforall x (Treacly(x) and Doubtful(x) -> Travelled(x))\nforall x (Pubescent(x) -> Biennial(x))\nforall x (Proofed(x) -> Profitless(x))\nforall x (Biennial(x) and Travelled(x) -> Proofed(x))\nDoubtful(englebert) -> Biennial(englebert)\nforall x (Travelled(x) -> Pubescent(x))\nforall x (Pubescent(x) -> Proofed(x))\nforall x (Biennial(x) -> Doubtful(x))\n\nnot Pubescent(latrena)\n\nTravelled(latrena) and forall x (Travelled(x) -> Pubescent(x)) -> therefore Pubescent(latrena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Wilmer is taliped. Wilmer is sunk. Wilmer is operable. Wilmer is plump. Wilmer is tetanic. Wilmer is monoatomic. Susannah is taliped. Susannah is terrible. Susannah is sunk. Susannah is plump. Susannah is monoatomic. Trix is sunk. Trix is operable. Trix is plump. Trix is monoatomic. If something is plump and tetanic then it is operable. If something is terrible then it is taliped. Round things are sunk. Big, operable things are monoatomic. If Susannah is tetanic then Susannah is taliped. All operable things are terrible. If something is terrible then it is monoatomic. All taliped things are tetanic. Trix is taliped.", "logic": "\nTaliped(wilmer)\nSunk(wilmer)\nOperable(wilmer)\nPlump(wilmer)\nTetanic(wilmer)\nMonoatomic(wilmer)\nTaliped(susannah)\nTerrible(susannah)\nSunk(susannah)\nPlump(susannah)\nMonoatomic(susannah)\nSunk(trix)\nOperable(trix)\nPlump(trix)\nMonoatomic(trix)\nforall x (Plump(x) and Tetanic(x) -> Operable(x))\nforall x (Terrible(x) -> Taliped(x))\nforall x (Monoatomic(x) -> Sunk(x))\nforall x (Taliped(x) and Operable(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nTetanic(susannah) -> Taliped(susannah)\nforall x (Operable(x) -> Terrible(x))\nforall x (Terrible(x) -> Monoatomic(x))\nforall x (Taliped(x) -> Tetanic(x))\n\nTaliped(trix)\n\nOperable(trix) and forall x (Operable(x) -> Terrible(x)) -> therefore Terrible(trix) Terrible(trix) and forall x (Terrible(x) -> Taliped(x)) -> therefore Taliped(trix)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Selle is mesodermal. Selle is placid. Selle is nitric. Selle is telepathic. Selle is mysterious. Selle is wartlike. Tonia is mesodermal. Tonia is isthmian. Tonia is placid. Tonia is telepathic. Tonia is wartlike. Nathalie is placid. Nathalie is nitric. Nathalie is telepathic. Nathalie is wartlike. If something is telepathic and mysterious then it is nitric. If something is isthmian then it is mesodermal. Round things are placid. Big, nitric things are wartlike. If Tonia is mysterious then Tonia is mesodermal. All nitric things are isthmian. If something is isthmian then it is wartlike. All mesodermal things are mysterious. Tonia is not nitric.", "logic": "\nMesodermal(selle)\nPlacid(selle)\nNitric(selle)\nTelepathic(selle)\nMysterious(selle)\nWartlike(selle)\nMesodermal(tonia)\nIsthmian(tonia)\nPlacid(tonia)\nTelepathic(tonia)\nWartlike(tonia)\nPlacid(nathalie)\nNitric(nathalie)\nTelepathic(nathalie)\nWartlike(nathalie)\nforall x (Telepathic(x) and Mysterious(x) -> Nitric(x))\nforall x (Isthmian(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Wartlike(x) -> Placid(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) and Nitric(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nMysterious(tonia) -> Mesodermal(tonia)\nforall x (Nitric(x) -> Isthmian(x))\nforall x (Isthmian(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Mysterious(x))\n\nnot Nitric(tonia)\n\nMesodermal(tonia) and forall x (Mesodermal(x) -> Mysterious(x)) -> therefore Mysterious(tonia) Telepathic(tonia) and Mysterious(tonia) and forall x (Telepathic(x) and Mysterious(x) -> Nitric(x)) -> therefore Nitric(tonia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Jeffery is virgin. Jeffery is ulterior. Jeffery is unsealed. Jeffery is soundless. Jeffery is unmated. Jeffery is tied. Jeffery is virgin. Jeffery is celebrated. Jeffery is ulterior. Jeffery is soundless. Jeffery is tied. Leese is ulterior. Leese is unsealed. Leese is soundless. Leese is tied. If something is soundless and unmated then it is unsealed. If something is celebrated then it is virgin. Round things are ulterior. Big, unsealed things are tied. If Jeffery is unmated then Jeffery is virgin. All unsealed things are celebrated. If something is celebrated then it is tied. All virgin things are unmated. Leese is unmated.", "logic": "\nVirgin(jeffery)\nUlterior(jeffery)\nUnsealed(jeffery)\nSoundless(jeffery)\nUnmated(jeffery)\nTied(jeffery)\nVirgin(jeffery)\nCelebrated(jeffery)\nUlterior(jeffery)\nSoundless(jeffery)\nTied(jeffery)\nUlterior(leese)\nUnsealed(leese)\nSoundless(leese)\nTied(leese)\nforall x (Soundless(x) and Unmated(x) -> Unsealed(x))\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Virgin(x))\nforall x (Tied(x) -> Ulterior(x))\nforall x (Virgin(x) and Unsealed(x) -> Tied(x))\nUnmated(jeffery) -> Virgin(jeffery)\nforall x (Unsealed(x) -> Celebrated(x))\nforall x (Celebrated(x) -> Tied(x))\nforall x (Virgin(x) -> Unmated(x))\n\nUnmated(leese)\n\nUnsealed(leese) and forall x (Unsealed(x) -> Celebrated(x)) -> therefore Celebrated(leese) Celebrated(leese) and forall x (Celebrated(x) -> Virgin(x)) -> therefore Virgin(leese) Virgin(leese) and forall x (Virgin(x) -> Unmated(x)) -> therefore Unmated(leese)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "Emmalee is intrinsic. Emmalee is zygodactyl. Emmalee is meshugge. Emmalee is acyclic. Emmalee is motored. Emmalee is following. Clerissa is intrinsic. Clerissa is unfed. Clerissa is zygodactyl. Clerissa is acyclic. Clerissa is following. Norton is zygodactyl. Norton is meshugge. Norton is acyclic. Norton is following. If something is acyclic and motored then it is meshugge. If something is unfed then it is intrinsic. Round things are zygodactyl. Big, meshugge things are following. If Clerissa is motored then Clerissa is intrinsic. All meshugge things are unfed. If something is unfed then it is following. All intrinsic things are motored. Norton is not motored.", "logic": "\nIntrinsic(emmalee)\nZygodactyl(emmalee)\nMeshugge(emmalee)\nAcyclic(emmalee)\nMotored(emmalee)\nFollowing(emmalee)\nIntrinsic(clerissa)\nUnfed(clerissa)\nZygodactyl(clerissa)\nAcyclic(clerissa)\nFollowing(clerissa)\nZygodactyl(norton)\nMeshugge(norton)\nAcyclic(norton)\nFollowing(norton)\nforall x (Acyclic(x) and Motored(x) -> Meshugge(x))\nforall x (Unfed(x) -> Intrinsic(x))\nforall x (Following(x) -> Zygodactyl(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) and Meshugge(x) -> Following(x))\nMotored(clerissa) -> Intrinsic(clerissa)\nforall x (Meshugge(x) -> Unfed(x))\nforall x (Unfed(x) -> Following(x))\nforall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Motored(x))\n\nnot Motored(norton)\n\nMeshugge(norton) and forall x (Meshugge(x) -> Unfed(x)) -> therefore Unfed(norton) Unfed(norton) and forall x (Unfed(x) -> Intrinsic(x)) -> therefore Intrinsic(norton) Intrinsic(norton) and forall x (Intrinsic(x) -> Motored(x)) -> therefore Motored(norton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1572"} {"premises": "The nerty is eyed. Young people are bantam. All conversant people are bantam. If the nerty is bantam and the nerty is eyed then the nerty is conversant. All eyed people are wretched. All busty people are wretched. If someone is busty and eyed then they are wretched. If someone is wretched then they are conversant. If the nerty is wretched and the nerty is bantam then the nerty is not busty. The nerty is eyed.", "logic": "\nEyed(nerty)\nforall x (Conversant(x) -> Bantam(x))\nforall x (Conversant(x) -> Bantam(x))\nBantam(nerty) and Eyed(nerty) -> Conversant(nerty)\nforall x (Eyed(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Busty(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Busty(x) and Eyed(x) -> Wretched(x))\nforall x (Wretched(x) -> Conversant(x))\nWretched(nerty) and Bantam(nerty) -> not Busty(nerty)\n\nEyed(nerty)\n\ntherefore Eyed(nerty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The zorah is sudorific. Young people are isoclinic. All extropic people are isoclinic. If the zorah is isoclinic and the zorah is sudorific then the zorah is extropic. All sudorific people are hindoo. All freaky people are hindoo. If someone is freaky and sudorific then they are hindoo. If someone is hindoo then they are extropic. If the zorah is hindoo and the zorah is isoclinic then the zorah is not freaky. The zorah is not sudorific.", "logic": "\nSudorific(zorah)\nforall x (Extropic(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\nforall x (Extropic(x) -> Isoclinic(x))\nIsoclinic(zorah) and Sudorific(zorah) -> Extropic(zorah)\nforall x (Sudorific(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nforall x (Freaky(x) and Sudorific(x) -> Hindoo(x))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) -> Extropic(x))\nHindoo(zorah) and Isoclinic(zorah) -> not Freaky(zorah)\n\nnot Sudorific(zorah)\n\ntherefore Sudorific(zorah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The pavia is profitless. Young people are patronized. All illative people are patronized. If the pavia is patronized and the pavia is profitless then the pavia is illative. All profitless people are unvoiced. All dogmatic people are unvoiced. If someone is dogmatic and profitless then they are unvoiced. If someone is unvoiced then they are illative. If the pavia is unvoiced and the pavia is patronized then the pavia is not dogmatic. The pavia is unvoiced.", "logic": "\nProfitless(pavia)\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Illative(x) -> Patronized(x))\nPatronized(pavia) and Profitless(pavia) -> Illative(pavia)\nforall x (Profitless(x) -> Unvoiced(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) -> Unvoiced(x))\nforall x (Dogmatic(x) and Profitless(x) -> Unvoiced(x))\nforall x (Unvoiced(x) -> Illative(x))\nUnvoiced(pavia) and Patronized(pavia) -> not Dogmatic(pavia)\n\nUnvoiced(pavia)\n\nProfitless(pavia) and forall x (Profitless(x) -> Unvoiced(x)) -> therefore Unvoiced(pavia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The adena is assured. Young people are aoristic. All pappose people are aoristic. If the adena is aoristic and the adena is assured then the adena is pappose. All assured people are leaky. All enraged people are leaky. If someone is enraged and assured then they are leaky. If someone is leaky then they are pappose. If the adena is leaky and the adena is aoristic then the adena is not enraged. The adena is not leaky.", "logic": "\nAssured(adena)\nforall x (Pappose(x) -> Aoristic(x))\nforall x (Pappose(x) -> Aoristic(x))\nAoristic(adena) and Assured(adena) -> Pappose(adena)\nforall x (Assured(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Enraged(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Enraged(x) and Assured(x) -> Leaky(x))\nforall x (Leaky(x) -> Pappose(x))\nLeaky(adena) and Aoristic(adena) -> not Enraged(adena)\n\nnot Leaky(adena)\n\nAssured(adena) and forall x (Assured(x) -> Leaky(x)) -> therefore Leaky(adena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The kathlene is unflavored. Young people are reconciled. All annulated people are reconciled. If the kathlene is reconciled and the kathlene is unflavored then the kathlene is annulated. All unflavored people are ossicular. All duncical people are ossicular. If someone is duncical and unflavored then they are ossicular. If someone is ossicular then they are annulated. If the kathlene is ossicular and the kathlene is reconciled then the kathlene is not duncical. The kathlene is annulated.", "logic": "\nUnflavored(kathlene)\nforall x (Annulated(x) -> Reconciled(x))\nforall x (Annulated(x) -> Reconciled(x))\nReconciled(kathlene) and Unflavored(kathlene) -> Annulated(kathlene)\nforall x (Unflavored(x) -> Ossicular(x))\nforall x (Duncical(x) -> Ossicular(x))\nforall x (Duncical(x) and Unflavored(x) -> Ossicular(x))\nforall x (Ossicular(x) -> Annulated(x))\nOssicular(kathlene) and Reconciled(kathlene) -> not Duncical(kathlene)\n\nAnnulated(kathlene)\n\nUnflavored(kathlene) and forall x (Unflavored(x) -> Ossicular(x)) -> therefore Ossicular(kathlene) Ossicular(kathlene) and forall x (Ossicular(x) -> Annulated(x)) -> therefore Annulated(kathlene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The jake is earned. Young people are arthurian. All rifled people are arthurian. If the jake is arthurian and the jake is earned then the jake is rifled. All earned people are droopy. All preeminent people are droopy. If someone is preeminent and earned then they are droopy. If someone is droopy then they are rifled. If the jake is droopy and the jake is arthurian then the jake is not preeminent. The jake is not rifled.", "logic": "\nEarned(jake)\nforall x (Rifled(x) -> Arthurian(x))\nforall x (Rifled(x) -> Arthurian(x))\nArthurian(jake) and Earned(jake) -> Rifled(jake)\nforall x (Earned(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Preeminent(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Preeminent(x) and Earned(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Droopy(x) -> Rifled(x))\nDroopy(jake) and Arthurian(jake) -> not Preeminent(jake)\n\nnot Rifled(jake)\n\nEarned(jake) and forall x (Earned(x) -> Droopy(x)) -> therefore Droopy(jake) Droopy(jake) and forall x (Droopy(x) -> Rifled(x)) -> therefore Rifled(jake)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The cary is clubby. Young people are shared. All undefined people are shared. If the cary is shared and the cary is clubby then the cary is undefined. All clubby people are stately. All prone people are stately. If someone is prone and clubby then they are stately. If someone is stately then they are undefined. If the cary is stately and the cary is shared then the cary is not prone. The cary is shared.", "logic": "\nClubby(cary)\nforall x (Undefined(x) -> Shared(x))\nforall x (Undefined(x) -> Shared(x))\nShared(cary) and Clubby(cary) -> Undefined(cary)\nforall x (Clubby(x) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Prone(x) and Clubby(x) -> Stately(x))\nforall x (Stately(x) -> Undefined(x))\nStately(cary) and Shared(cary) -> not Prone(cary)\n\nShared(cary)\n\nClubby(cary) and forall x (Clubby(x) -> Stately(x)) -> therefore Stately(cary) Stately(cary) and forall x (Stately(x) -> Undefined(x)) -> therefore Undefined(cary) Undefined(cary) and forall x (Undefined(x) -> Shared(x)) -> therefore Shared(cary)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The hamish is destined. Young people are solid. All possessive people are solid. If the hamish is solid and the hamish is destined then the hamish is possessive. All destined people are lachrymose. All leprose people are lachrymose. If someone is leprose and destined then they are lachrymose. If someone is lachrymose then they are possessive. If the hamish is lachrymose and the hamish is solid then the hamish is not leprose. The hamish is not solid.", "logic": "\nDestined(hamish)\nforall x (Possessive(x) -> Solid(x))\nforall x (Possessive(x) -> Solid(x))\nSolid(hamish) and Destined(hamish) -> Possessive(hamish)\nforall x (Destined(x) -> Lachrymose(x))\nforall x (Leprose(x) -> Lachrymose(x))\nforall x (Leprose(x) and Destined(x) -> Lachrymose(x))\nforall x (Lachrymose(x) -> Possessive(x))\nLachrymose(hamish) and Solid(hamish) -> not Leprose(hamish)\n\nnot Solid(hamish)\n\nDestined(hamish) and forall x (Destined(x) -> Lachrymose(x)) -> therefore Lachrymose(hamish) Lachrymose(hamish) and forall x (Lachrymose(x) -> Possessive(x)) -> therefore Possessive(hamish) Possessive(hamish) and forall x (Possessive(x) -> Solid(x)) -> therefore Solid(hamish)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The clyde is tensed. Young people are matured. All steadfast people are matured. If the clyde is matured and the clyde is tensed then the clyde is steadfast. All tensed people are mercuric. All piscine people are mercuric. If someone is piscine and tensed then they are mercuric. If someone is mercuric then they are steadfast. If the clyde is mercuric and the clyde is matured then the clyde is not piscine. The clyde does not eat the clyde.", "logic": "\nTensed(clyde)\nforall x (Steadfast(x) -> Matured(x))\nforall x (Steadfast(x) -> Matured(x))\nMatured(clyde) and Tensed(clyde) -> Steadfast(clyde)\nforall x (Tensed(x) -> Mercuric(x))\nforall x (Piscine(x) -> Mercuric(x))\nforall x (Piscine(x) and Tensed(x) -> Mercuric(x))\nforall x (Mercuric(x) -> Steadfast(x))\nMercuric(clyde) and Matured(clyde) -> not Piscine(clyde)\n\nnot Eats(clyde, clyde)\n\nnot Eats(clyde, clyde) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "The antoine is experient. Young people are demeaning. All stateless people are demeaning. If the antoine is demeaning and the antoine is experient then the antoine is stateless. All experient people are unctuous. All iterative people are unctuous. If someone is iterative and experient then they are unctuous. If someone is unctuous then they are stateless. If the antoine is unctuous and the antoine is demeaning then the antoine is not iterative. The antoine likes the antoine.", "logic": "\nExperient(antoine)\nforall x (Stateless(x) -> Demeaning(x))\nforall x (Stateless(x) -> Demeaning(x))\nDemeaning(antoine) and Experient(antoine) -> Stateless(antoine)\nforall x (Experient(x) -> Unctuous(x))\nforall x (Iterative(x) -> Unctuous(x))\nforall x (Iterative(x) and Experient(x) -> Unctuous(x))\nforall x (Unctuous(x) -> Stateless(x))\nUnctuous(antoine) and Demeaning(antoine) -> not Iterative(antoine)\n\nLikes(antoine, antoine)\n\nLikes(antoine, antoine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-123"} {"premises": "Aura is curtained. Aura is unvendible. Aura is nosey. Aura is smallish. Karmen is curtained. Karmen is unvendible. Karmen is nosey. Karmen is acceptable. Karmen is epizoic. Alisun is seeable. Alisun is unvendible. Alisun is smallish. Alisun is acceptable. Aubrette is nosey. Aubrette is smallish. Aubrette is acceptable. Nice, unvendible things are smallish. Smart things are curtained. If something is acceptable and smallish then it is epizoic. If Aura is acceptable then Aura is nosey. If something is seeable and acceptable then it is smallish. If Aubrette is acceptable and Aubrette is curtained then Aubrette is unvendible. Aura is curtained.", "logic": "\nCurtained(aura)\nUnvendible(aura)\nNosey(aura)\nSmallish(aura)\nCurtained(karmen)\nUnvendible(karmen)\nNosey(karmen)\nAcceptable(karmen)\nEpizoic(karmen)\nSeeable(alisun)\nUnvendible(alisun)\nSmallish(alisun)\nAcceptable(alisun)\nNosey(aubrette)\nSmallish(aubrette)\nAcceptable(aubrette)\nforall x (Nosey(x) and Unvendible(x) -> Smallish(x))\nforall x (Epizoic(x) -> Curtained(x))\nforall x (Acceptable(x) and Smallish(x) -> Epizoic(x))\nAcceptable(aura) -> Nosey(aura)\nforall x (Seeable(x) and Acceptable(x) -> Smallish(x))\nAcceptable(aubrette) and Curtained(aubrette) -> Unvendible(aubrette)\n\nCurtained(aura)\n\ntherefore Curtained(aura)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Joscelin is prefatory. Joscelin is forgetful. Joscelin is unleavened. Joscelin is violent. Anni is prefatory. Anni is forgetful. Anni is unleavened. Anni is unowned. Anni is curricular. Verne is cogent. Verne is forgetful. Verne is violent. Verne is unowned. Demetrius is unleavened. Demetrius is violent. Demetrius is unowned. Nice, forgetful things are violent. Smart things are prefatory. If something is unowned and violent then it is curricular. If Joscelin is unowned then Joscelin is unleavened. If something is cogent and unowned then it is violent. If Demetrius is unowned and Demetrius is prefatory then Demetrius is forgetful. Joscelin is not forgetful.", "logic": "\nPrefatory(joscelin)\nForgetful(joscelin)\nUnleavened(joscelin)\nViolent(joscelin)\nPrefatory(anni)\nForgetful(anni)\nUnleavened(anni)\nUnowned(anni)\nCurricular(anni)\nCogent(verne)\nForgetful(verne)\nViolent(verne)\nUnowned(verne)\nUnleavened(demetrius)\nViolent(demetrius)\nUnowned(demetrius)\nforall x (Unleavened(x) and Forgetful(x) -> Violent(x))\nforall x (Curricular(x) -> Prefatory(x))\nforall x (Unowned(x) and Violent(x) -> Curricular(x))\nUnowned(joscelin) -> Unleavened(joscelin)\nforall x (Cogent(x) and Unowned(x) -> Violent(x))\nUnowned(demetrius) and Prefatory(demetrius) -> Forgetful(demetrius)\n\nnot Forgetful(joscelin)\n\ntherefore Forgetful(joscelin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Vivie is asteriated. Vivie is snuffly. Vivie is runic. Vivie is unfeminine. Deanne is asteriated. Deanne is snuffly. Deanne is runic. Deanne is leaning. Deanne is cleavable. Ebba is enatic. Ebba is snuffly. Ebba is unfeminine. Ebba is leaning. Ina is runic. Ina is unfeminine. Ina is leaning. Nice, snuffly things are unfeminine. Smart things are asteriated. If something is leaning and unfeminine then it is cleavable. If Vivie is leaning then Vivie is runic. If something is enatic and leaning then it is unfeminine. If Ina is leaning and Ina is asteriated then Ina is snuffly. Ebba is cleavable.", "logic": "\nAsteriated(vivie)\nSnuffly(vivie)\nRunic(vivie)\nUnfeminine(vivie)\nAsteriated(deanne)\nSnuffly(deanne)\nRunic(deanne)\nLeaning(deanne)\nCleavable(deanne)\nEnatic(ebba)\nSnuffly(ebba)\nUnfeminine(ebba)\nLeaning(ebba)\nRunic(ina)\nUnfeminine(ina)\nLeaning(ina)\nforall x (Runic(x) and Snuffly(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nforall x (Cleavable(x) -> Asteriated(x))\nforall x (Leaning(x) and Unfeminine(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nLeaning(vivie) -> Runic(vivie)\nforall x (Enatic(x) and Leaning(x) -> Unfeminine(x))\nLeaning(ina) and Asteriated(ina) -> Snuffly(ina)\n\nCleavable(ebba)\n\nLeaning(ebba) and Unfeminine(ebba) and forall x (Leaning(x) and Unfeminine(x) -> Cleavable(x)) -> therefore Cleavable(ebba)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Simeon is backstair. Simeon is hesitating. Simeon is tetchy. Simeon is nineteen. Yale is backstair. Yale is hesitating. Yale is tetchy. Yale is plumose. Yale is aspirant. Clarey is stillborn. Clarey is hesitating. Clarey is nineteen. Clarey is plumose. Liane is tetchy. Liane is nineteen. Liane is plumose. Nice, hesitating things are nineteen. Smart things are backstair. If something is plumose and nineteen then it is aspirant. If Simeon is plumose then Simeon is tetchy. If something is stillborn and plumose then it is nineteen. If Liane is plumose and Liane is backstair then Liane is hesitating. Liane is not aspirant.", "logic": "\nBackstair(simeon)\nHesitating(simeon)\nTetchy(simeon)\nNineteen(simeon)\nBackstair(yale)\nHesitating(yale)\nTetchy(yale)\nPlumose(yale)\nAspirant(yale)\nStillborn(clarey)\nHesitating(clarey)\nNineteen(clarey)\nPlumose(clarey)\nTetchy(liane)\nNineteen(liane)\nPlumose(liane)\nforall x (Tetchy(x) and Hesitating(x) -> Nineteen(x))\nforall x (Aspirant(x) -> Backstair(x))\nforall x (Plumose(x) and Nineteen(x) -> Aspirant(x))\nPlumose(simeon) -> Tetchy(simeon)\nforall x (Stillborn(x) and Plumose(x) -> Nineteen(x))\nPlumose(liane) and Backstair(liane) -> Hesitating(liane)\n\nnot Aspirant(liane)\n\nPlumose(liane) and Nineteen(liane) and forall x (Plumose(x) and Nineteen(x) -> Aspirant(x)) -> therefore Aspirant(liane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Jacob is eventful. Jacob is mitral. Jacob is biramous. Jacob is nativistic. Jojo is eventful. Jojo is mitral. Jojo is biramous. Jojo is real. Jojo is bombastic. Augustine is eremitic. Augustine is mitral. Augustine is nativistic. Augustine is real. Konrad is biramous. Konrad is nativistic. Konrad is real. Nice, mitral things are nativistic. Smart things are eventful. If something is real and nativistic then it is bombastic. If Jacob is real then Jacob is biramous. If something is eremitic and real then it is nativistic. If Konrad is real and Konrad is eventful then Konrad is mitral. Konrad is eventful.", "logic": "\nEventful(jacob)\nMitral(jacob)\nBiramous(jacob)\nNativistic(jacob)\nEventful(jojo)\nMitral(jojo)\nBiramous(jojo)\nReal(jojo)\nBombastic(jojo)\nEremitic(augustine)\nMitral(augustine)\nNativistic(augustine)\nReal(augustine)\nBiramous(konrad)\nNativistic(konrad)\nReal(konrad)\nforall x (Biramous(x) and Mitral(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nforall x (Bombastic(x) -> Eventful(x))\nforall x (Real(x) and Nativistic(x) -> Bombastic(x))\nReal(jacob) -> Biramous(jacob)\nforall x (Eremitic(x) and Real(x) -> Nativistic(x))\nReal(konrad) and Eventful(konrad) -> Mitral(konrad)\n\nEventful(konrad)\n\nReal(konrad) and Nativistic(konrad) and forall x (Real(x) and Nativistic(x) -> Bombastic(x)) -> therefore Bombastic(konrad) Bombastic(konrad) and forall x (Bombastic(x) -> Eventful(x)) -> therefore Eventful(konrad)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Kristine is glooming. Kristine is glooming. Kristine is unwaxed. Kristine is dependable. Jodie is glooming. Jodie is glooming. Jodie is unwaxed. Jodie is negligible. Jodie is sickly. Rodd is disarrayed. Rodd is glooming. Rodd is dependable. Rodd is negligible. Simon is unwaxed. Simon is dependable. Simon is negligible. Nice, glooming things are dependable. Smart things are glooming. If something is negligible and dependable then it is sickly. If Kristine is negligible then Kristine is unwaxed. If something is disarrayed and negligible then it is dependable. If Simon is negligible and Simon is glooming then Simon is glooming. Simon is not glooming.", "logic": "\nGlooming(kristine)\nGlooming(kristine)\nUnwaxed(kristine)\nDependable(kristine)\nGlooming(jodie)\nGlooming(jodie)\nUnwaxed(jodie)\nNegligible(jodie)\nSickly(jodie)\nDisarrayed(rodd)\nGlooming(rodd)\nDependable(rodd)\nNegligible(rodd)\nUnwaxed(simon)\nDependable(simon)\nNegligible(simon)\nforall x (Unwaxed(x) and Glooming(x) -> Dependable(x))\nforall x (Sickly(x) -> Glooming(x))\nforall x (Negligible(x) and Dependable(x) -> Sickly(x))\nNegligible(kristine) -> Unwaxed(kristine)\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) and Negligible(x) -> Dependable(x))\nNegligible(simon) and Glooming(simon) -> Glooming(simon)\n\nnot Glooming(simon)\n\nNegligible(simon) and Dependable(simon) and forall x (Negligible(x) and Dependable(x) -> Sickly(x)) -> therefore Sickly(simon) Sickly(simon) and forall x (Sickly(x) -> Glooming(x)) -> therefore Glooming(simon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Edin is realizable. Edin is cuspidate. Edin is fruity. Edin is plenary. Myrah is realizable. Myrah is cuspidate. Myrah is fruity. Myrah is rapturous. Myrah is fortunate. Puff is weaned. Puff is cuspidate. Puff is plenary. Puff is rapturous. Myna is fruity. Myna is plenary. Myna is rapturous. Nice, cuspidate things are plenary. Smart things are realizable. If something is rapturous and plenary then it is fortunate. If Edin is rapturous then Edin is fruity. If something is weaned and rapturous then it is plenary. If Myna is rapturous and Myna is realizable then Myna is cuspidate. Myna is cuspidate.", "logic": "\nRealizable(edin)\nCuspidate(edin)\nFruity(edin)\nPlenary(edin)\nRealizable(myrah)\nCuspidate(myrah)\nFruity(myrah)\nRapturous(myrah)\nFortunate(myrah)\nWeaned(puff)\nCuspidate(puff)\nPlenary(puff)\nRapturous(puff)\nFruity(myna)\nPlenary(myna)\nRapturous(myna)\nforall x (Fruity(x) and Cuspidate(x) -> Plenary(x))\nforall x (Fortunate(x) -> Realizable(x))\nforall x (Rapturous(x) and Plenary(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nRapturous(edin) -> Fruity(edin)\nforall x (Weaned(x) and Rapturous(x) -> Plenary(x))\nRapturous(myna) and Realizable(myna) -> Cuspidate(myna)\n\nCuspidate(myna)\n\nRapturous(myna) and Plenary(myna) and forall x (Rapturous(x) and Plenary(x) -> Fortunate(x)) -> therefore Fortunate(myna) Fortunate(myna) and forall x (Fortunate(x) -> Realizable(x)) -> therefore Realizable(myna) Rapturous(myna) and Realizable(myna) and Rapturous(myna) and Realizable(myna) -> Cuspidate(myna) -> therefore Cuspidate(myna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Prudence is chimerical. Prudence is palpable. Prudence is narcotic. Prudence is supposable. Ilise is chimerical. Ilise is palpable. Ilise is narcotic. Ilise is ungallant. Ilise is deuced. Keeley is northerly. Keeley is palpable. Keeley is supposable. Keeley is ungallant. Marta is narcotic. Marta is supposable. Marta is ungallant. Nice, palpable things are supposable. Smart things are chimerical. If something is ungallant and supposable then it is deuced. If Prudence is ungallant then Prudence is narcotic. If something is northerly and ungallant then it is supposable. If Marta is ungallant and Marta is chimerical then Marta is palpable. Marta is not palpable.", "logic": "\nChimerical(prudence)\nPalpable(prudence)\nNarcotic(prudence)\nSupposable(prudence)\nChimerical(ilise)\nPalpable(ilise)\nNarcotic(ilise)\nUngallant(ilise)\nDeuced(ilise)\nNortherly(keeley)\nPalpable(keeley)\nSupposable(keeley)\nUngallant(keeley)\nNarcotic(marta)\nSupposable(marta)\nUngallant(marta)\nforall x (Narcotic(x) and Palpable(x) -> Supposable(x))\nforall x (Deuced(x) -> Chimerical(x))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Supposable(x) -> Deuced(x))\nUngallant(prudence) -> Narcotic(prudence)\nforall x (Northerly(x) and Ungallant(x) -> Supposable(x))\nUngallant(marta) and Chimerical(marta) -> Palpable(marta)\n\nnot Palpable(marta)\n\nUngallant(marta) and Supposable(marta) and forall x (Ungallant(x) and Supposable(x) -> Deuced(x)) -> therefore Deuced(marta) Deuced(marta) and forall x (Deuced(x) -> Chimerical(x)) -> therefore Chimerical(marta) Ungallant(marta) and Chimerical(marta) and Ungallant(marta) and Chimerical(marta) -> Palpable(marta) -> therefore Palpable(marta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Murdoch is hasidic. Murdoch is analeptic. Murdoch is polyglot. Murdoch is minuscule. Sheril is hasidic. Sheril is analeptic. Sheril is polyglot. Sheril is threatened. Sheril is multicolor. Ariel is wobbling. Ariel is analeptic. Ariel is minuscule. Ariel is threatened. Gerianne is polyglot. Gerianne is minuscule. Gerianne is threatened. Nice, analeptic things are minuscule. Smart things are hasidic. If something is threatened and minuscule then it is multicolor. If Murdoch is threatened then Murdoch is polyglot. If something is wobbling and threatened then it is minuscule. If Gerianne is threatened and Gerianne is hasidic then Gerianne is analeptic. Murdoch is not multicolor.", "logic": "\nHasidic(murdoch)\nAnaleptic(murdoch)\nPolyglot(murdoch)\nMinuscule(murdoch)\nHasidic(sheril)\nAnaleptic(sheril)\nPolyglot(sheril)\nThreatened(sheril)\nMulticolor(sheril)\nWobbling(ariel)\nAnaleptic(ariel)\nMinuscule(ariel)\nThreatened(ariel)\nPolyglot(gerianne)\nMinuscule(gerianne)\nThreatened(gerianne)\nforall x (Polyglot(x) and Analeptic(x) -> Minuscule(x))\nforall x (Multicolor(x) -> Hasidic(x))\nforall x (Threatened(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Multicolor(x))\nThreatened(murdoch) -> Polyglot(murdoch)\nforall x (Wobbling(x) and Threatened(x) -> Minuscule(x))\nThreatened(gerianne) and Hasidic(gerianne) -> Analeptic(gerianne)\n\nnot Multicolor(murdoch)\n\nforall x (Threatened(x) and Minuscule(x) -> Multicolor(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Bary is civilized. Bary is uncomely. Bary is witless. Bary is thematic. Lenny is civilized. Lenny is uncomely. Lenny is witless. Lenny is devious. Lenny is bladelike. Theresina is credal. Theresina is uncomely. Theresina is thematic. Theresina is devious. Tabbi is witless. Tabbi is thematic. Tabbi is devious. Nice, uncomely things are thematic. Smart things are civilized. If something is devious and thematic then it is bladelike. If Bary is devious then Bary is witless. If something is credal and devious then it is thematic. If Tabbi is devious and Tabbi is civilized then Tabbi is uncomely. Bary is credal.", "logic": "\nCivilized(bary)\nUncomely(bary)\nWitless(bary)\nThematic(bary)\nCivilized(lenny)\nUncomely(lenny)\nWitless(lenny)\nDevious(lenny)\nBladelike(lenny)\nCredal(theresina)\nUncomely(theresina)\nThematic(theresina)\nDevious(theresina)\nWitless(tabbi)\nThematic(tabbi)\nDevious(tabbi)\nforall x (Witless(x) and Uncomely(x) -> Thematic(x))\nforall x (Bladelike(x) -> Civilized(x))\nforall x (Devious(x) and Thematic(x) -> Bladelike(x))\nDevious(bary) -> Witless(bary)\nforall x (Credal(x) and Devious(x) -> Thematic(x))\nDevious(tabbi) and Civilized(tabbi) -> Uncomely(tabbi)\n\nCredal(bary)\n\nCredal(bary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Katey is unsuitable. Katey is polygonal. Katey is elfin. Katey is aeolian. Johnathan is unsuitable. Johnathan is polygonal. Johnathan is elfin. Johnathan is pestering. Johnathan is decadent. Havivah is standby. Havivah is polygonal. Havivah is aeolian. Havivah is pestering. Carolyn is elfin. Carolyn is aeolian. Carolyn is pestering. Nice, polygonal things are aeolian. Smart things are unsuitable. If something is pestering and aeolian then it is decadent. If Katey is pestering then Katey is elfin. If something is standby and pestering then it is aeolian. If Carolyn is pestering and Carolyn is unsuitable then Carolyn is polygonal. Johnathan is not standby.", "logic": "\nUnsuitable(katey)\nPolygonal(katey)\nElfin(katey)\nAeolian(katey)\nUnsuitable(johnathan)\nPolygonal(johnathan)\nElfin(johnathan)\nPestering(johnathan)\nDecadent(johnathan)\nStandby(havivah)\nPolygonal(havivah)\nAeolian(havivah)\nPestering(havivah)\nElfin(carolyn)\nAeolian(carolyn)\nPestering(carolyn)\nforall x (Elfin(x) and Polygonal(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nforall x (Decadent(x) -> Unsuitable(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) and Aeolian(x) -> Decadent(x))\nPestering(katey) -> Elfin(katey)\nforall x (Standby(x) and Pestering(x) -> Aeolian(x))\nPestering(carolyn) and Unsuitable(carolyn) -> Polygonal(carolyn)\n\nnot Standby(johnathan)\n\nnot Standby(johnathan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Weylin is riant. Weylin is overlarge. Weylin is partizan. Weylin is naive. Brier is riant. Brier is overlarge. Brier is partizan. Brier is posted. Brier is walloping. Mamie is carboxylic. Mamie is overlarge. Mamie is naive. Mamie is posted. Waleed is partizan. Waleed is naive. Waleed is posted. Nice, overlarge things are naive. Smart things are riant. If something is posted and naive then it is walloping. If Weylin is posted then Weylin is partizan. If something is carboxylic and posted then it is naive. If Waleed is posted and Waleed is riant then Waleed is overlarge. Waleed is carboxylic.", "logic": "\nRiant(weylin)\nOverlarge(weylin)\nPartizan(weylin)\nNaive(weylin)\nRiant(brier)\nOverlarge(brier)\nPartizan(brier)\nPosted(brier)\nWalloping(brier)\nCarboxylic(mamie)\nOverlarge(mamie)\nNaive(mamie)\nPosted(mamie)\nPartizan(waleed)\nNaive(waleed)\nPosted(waleed)\nforall x (Partizan(x) and Overlarge(x) -> Naive(x))\nforall x (Walloping(x) -> Riant(x))\nforall x (Posted(x) and Naive(x) -> Walloping(x))\nPosted(weylin) -> Partizan(weylin)\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) and Posted(x) -> Naive(x))\nPosted(waleed) and Riant(waleed) -> Overlarge(waleed)\n\nCarboxylic(waleed)\n\nCarboxylic(waleed) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Sylvester is boreal. Sylvester is portly. Sylvester is gossipy. Sylvester is nonpolar. Riannon is boreal. Riannon is portly. Riannon is gossipy. Riannon is pastelike. Riannon is usual. Ebba is tipped. Ebba is portly. Ebba is nonpolar. Ebba is pastelike. Susanna is gossipy. Susanna is nonpolar. Susanna is pastelike. Nice, portly things are nonpolar. Smart things are boreal. If something is pastelike and nonpolar then it is usual. If Sylvester is pastelike then Sylvester is gossipy. If something is tipped and pastelike then it is nonpolar. If Susanna is pastelike and Susanna is boreal then Susanna is portly. Sylvester is not pastelike.", "logic": "\nBoreal(sylvester)\nPortly(sylvester)\nGossipy(sylvester)\nNonpolar(sylvester)\nBoreal(riannon)\nPortly(riannon)\nGossipy(riannon)\nPastelike(riannon)\nUsual(riannon)\nTipped(ebba)\nPortly(ebba)\nNonpolar(ebba)\nPastelike(ebba)\nGossipy(susanna)\nNonpolar(susanna)\nPastelike(susanna)\nforall x (Gossipy(x) and Portly(x) -> Nonpolar(x))\nforall x (Usual(x) -> Boreal(x))\nforall x (Pastelike(x) and Nonpolar(x) -> Usual(x))\nPastelike(sylvester) -> Gossipy(sylvester)\nforall x (Tipped(x) and Pastelike(x) -> Nonpolar(x))\nPastelike(susanna) and Boreal(susanna) -> Portly(susanna)\n\nnot Pastelike(sylvester)\n\nnot Pastelike(sylvester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Kellsie is onstage. Kellsie is imperial. Kellsie is overturned. Kellsie is panicled. Stillman is onstage. Stillman is imperial. Stillman is overturned. Stillman is glaring. Stillman is chanted. Laurence is revertible. Laurence is imperial. Laurence is panicled. Laurence is glaring. Jemmie is overturned. Jemmie is panicled. Jemmie is glaring. Nice, imperial things are panicled. Smart things are onstage. If something is glaring and panicled then it is chanted. If Kellsie is glaring then Kellsie is overturned. If something is revertible and glaring then it is panicled. If Jemmie is glaring and Jemmie is onstage then Jemmie is imperial. Laurence is overturned.", "logic": "\nOnstage(kellsie)\nImperial(kellsie)\nOverturned(kellsie)\nPanicled(kellsie)\nOnstage(stillman)\nImperial(stillman)\nOverturned(stillman)\nGlaring(stillman)\nChanted(stillman)\nRevertible(laurence)\nImperial(laurence)\nPanicled(laurence)\nGlaring(laurence)\nOverturned(jemmie)\nPanicled(jemmie)\nGlaring(jemmie)\nforall x (Overturned(x) and Imperial(x) -> Panicled(x))\nforall x (Chanted(x) -> Onstage(x))\nforall x (Glaring(x) and Panicled(x) -> Chanted(x))\nGlaring(kellsie) -> Overturned(kellsie)\nforall x (Revertible(x) and Glaring(x) -> Panicled(x))\nGlaring(jemmie) and Onstage(jemmie) -> Imperial(jemmie)\n\nOverturned(laurence)\n\nOverturned(laurence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1935"} {"premises": "Giraldo is dressy. Giraldo is norwegian. Giraldo is not resonant. Giraldo is supposed. Giraldo is unsavory. Giraldo is tenderised. Giraldo is not forward. Sheela is not dressy. Sheela is norwegian. Sheela is not unsavory. Sheela is tenderised. Sheela is forward. All norwegian, unsavory things are dressy. If something is forward and not resonant then it is unsavory. Sheela is norwegian.", "logic": "\nDressy(giraldo)\nNorwegian(giraldo)\nnot Resonant(giraldo)\nSupposed(giraldo)\nUnsavory(giraldo)\nTenderised(giraldo)\nnot Forward(giraldo)\nnot Dressy(sheela)\nNorwegian(sheela)\nnot Unsavory(sheela)\nTenderised(sheela)\nForward(sheela)\nforall x (Norwegian(x) and Unsavory(x) -> Dressy(x))\nforall x (Forward(x) and not Resonant(x) -> Unsavory(x))\n\nNorwegian(sheela)\n\ntherefore Norwegian(sheela)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5518"} {"premises": "Ashlee is semiotical. Ashlee is wise. Ashlee is not mirrorlike. Ashlee is possessed. Ashlee is frank. Ashlee is alar. Ashlee is not projectile. Susanna is not semiotical. Susanna is wise. Susanna is not frank. Susanna is alar. Susanna is projectile. All wise, frank things are semiotical. If something is projectile and not mirrorlike then it is frank. Ashlee is not possessed.", "logic": "\nSemiotical(ashlee)\nWise(ashlee)\nnot Mirrorlike(ashlee)\nPossessed(ashlee)\nFrank(ashlee)\nAlar(ashlee)\nnot Projectile(ashlee)\nnot Semiotical(susanna)\nWise(susanna)\nnot Frank(susanna)\nAlar(susanna)\nProjectile(susanna)\nforall x (Wise(x) and Frank(x) -> Semiotical(x))\nforall x (Projectile(x) and not Mirrorlike(x) -> Frank(x))\n\nnot Possessed(ashlee)\n\ntherefore Possessed(ashlee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5518"} {"premises": "Leonid is leguminous. Leonid is bicoloured. Leonid is not mortuary. Leonid is midwestern. Leonid is plugged. Leonid is must. Leonid is not canescent. Roni is not leguminous. Roni is bicoloured. Roni is not plugged. Roni is must. Roni is canescent. All bicoloured, plugged things are leguminous. If something is canescent and not mortuary then it is plugged. Roni is not midwestern.", "logic": "\nLeguminous(leonid)\nBicoloured(leonid)\nnot Mortuary(leonid)\nMidwestern(leonid)\nPlugged(leonid)\nMust(leonid)\nnot Canescent(leonid)\nnot Leguminous(roni)\nBicoloured(roni)\nnot Plugged(roni)\nMust(roni)\nCanescent(roni)\nforall x (Bicoloured(x) and Plugged(x) -> Leguminous(x))\nforall x (Canescent(x) and not Mortuary(x) -> Plugged(x))\n\nnot Midwestern(roni)\n\nnot Midwestern(roni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5518"} {"premises": "Nada is anasarcous. Nada is groundless. Nada is not narial. Nada is bothered. Nada is changeful. Nada is seventeen. Nada is not misty. Noel is not anasarcous. Noel is groundless. Noel is not changeful. Noel is seventeen. Noel is misty. All groundless, changeful things are anasarcous. If something is misty and not narial then it is changeful. Noel is narial.", "logic": "\nAnasarcous(nada)\nGroundless(nada)\nnot Narial(nada)\nBothered(nada)\nChangeful(nada)\nSeventeen(nada)\nnot Misty(nada)\nnot Anasarcous(noel)\nGroundless(noel)\nnot Changeful(noel)\nSeventeen(noel)\nMisty(noel)\nforall x (Groundless(x) and Changeful(x) -> Anasarcous(x))\nforall x (Misty(x) and not Narial(x) -> Changeful(x))\n\nNarial(noel)\n\nNarial(noel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5518"} {"premises": "Dinah is southwest. Dinah is crispate. Dinah is innate. Dinah is woolly. Dinah is tasteless. Norton is crispate. Casi is crispate. Casi is vaccinated. Kermit is crispate. Kermit is innate. If Casi is woolly and Casi is crispate then Casi is gruelling. All vaccinated things are crispate. If Norton is innate and Norton is southwest then Norton is not vaccinated. If Casi is tasteless then Casi is not southwest. If something is innate and not crispate then it is not tasteless. If something is crispate and not vaccinated then it is tasteless. If something is southwest then it is tasteless. If Dinah is woolly and Dinah is tasteless then Dinah is innate. Dinah is innate.", "logic": "\nSouthwest(dinah)\nCrispate(dinah)\nInnate(dinah)\nWoolly(dinah)\nTasteless(dinah)\nCrispate(norton)\nCrispate(casi)\nVaccinated(casi)\nCrispate(kermit)\nInnate(kermit)\nWoolly(casi) and Crispate(casi) -> Gruelling(casi)\nforall x (Vaccinated(x) -> Crispate(x))\nInnate(norton) and Southwest(norton) -> not Vaccinated(norton)\nTasteless(casi) -> not Southwest(casi)\nforall x (Innate(x) and not Crispate(x) -> not Tasteless(x))\nforall x (Crispate(x) and not Vaccinated(x) -> Tasteless(x))\nforall x (Southwest(x) -> Tasteless(x))\nWoolly(dinah) and Tasteless(dinah) -> Innate(dinah)\n\nInnate(dinah)\n\ntherefore Innate(dinah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3444"} {"premises": "Felipe is teetotal. Felipe is waiting. Felipe is solo. Felipe is assertable. Felipe is specious. Donielle is waiting. Thaddius is waiting. Thaddius is hidrotic. Beale is waiting. Beale is solo. If Thaddius is assertable and Thaddius is waiting then Thaddius is minatory. All hidrotic things are waiting. If Donielle is solo and Donielle is teetotal then Donielle is not hidrotic. If Thaddius is specious then Thaddius is not teetotal. If something is solo and not waiting then it is not specious. If something is waiting and not hidrotic then it is specious. If something is teetotal then it is specious. If Felipe is assertable and Felipe is specious then Felipe is solo. Felipe is not assertable.", "logic": "\nTeetotal(felipe)\nWaiting(felipe)\nSolo(felipe)\nAssertable(felipe)\nSpecious(felipe)\nWaiting(donielle)\nWaiting(thaddius)\nHidrotic(thaddius)\nWaiting(beale)\nSolo(beale)\nAssertable(thaddius) and Waiting(thaddius) -> Minatory(thaddius)\nforall x (Hidrotic(x) -> Waiting(x))\nSolo(donielle) and Teetotal(donielle) -> not Hidrotic(donielle)\nSpecious(thaddius) -> not Teetotal(thaddius)\nforall x (Solo(x) and not Waiting(x) -> not Specious(x))\nforall x (Waiting(x) and not Hidrotic(x) -> Specious(x))\nforall x (Teetotal(x) -> Specious(x))\nAssertable(felipe) and Specious(felipe) -> Solo(felipe)\n\nnot Assertable(felipe)\n\ntherefore Assertable(felipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3444"} {"premises": "Lyndsie is coagulate. Lyndsie is witty. Lyndsie is boon. Lyndsie is held. Lyndsie is ceruminous. Adina is witty. Laney is witty. Laney is traceable. Dustin is witty. Dustin is boon. If Laney is held and Laney is witty then Laney is entitled. All traceable things are witty. If Adina is boon and Adina is coagulate then Adina is not traceable. If Laney is ceruminous then Laney is not coagulate. If something is boon and not witty then it is not ceruminous. If something is witty and not traceable then it is ceruminous. If something is coagulate then it is ceruminous. If Lyndsie is held and Lyndsie is ceruminous then Lyndsie is boon. Dustin is not ceruminous.", "logic": "\nCoagulate(lyndsie)\nWitty(lyndsie)\nBoon(lyndsie)\nHeld(lyndsie)\nCeruminous(lyndsie)\nWitty(adina)\nWitty(laney)\nTraceable(laney)\nWitty(dustin)\nBoon(dustin)\nHeld(laney) and Witty(laney) -> Entitled(laney)\nforall x (Traceable(x) -> Witty(x))\nBoon(adina) and Coagulate(adina) -> not Traceable(adina)\nCeruminous(laney) -> not Coagulate(laney)\nforall x (Boon(x) and not Witty(x) -> not Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Witty(x) and not Traceable(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nforall x (Coagulate(x) -> Ceruminous(x))\nHeld(lyndsie) and Ceruminous(lyndsie) -> Boon(lyndsie)\n\nnot Ceruminous(dustin)\n\nforall x (Witty(x) and not Traceable(x) -> Ceruminous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3444"} {"premises": "Daryn is cubist. Daryn is erosive. Daryn is carousing. Daryn is putrid. Daryn is worldwide. Sturgis is erosive. Peyter is erosive. Peyter is nepalese. Guendolen is erosive. Guendolen is carousing. If Peyter is putrid and Peyter is erosive then Peyter is limited. All nepalese things are erosive. If Sturgis is carousing and Sturgis is cubist then Sturgis is not nepalese. If Peyter is worldwide then Peyter is not cubist. If something is carousing and not erosive then it is not worldwide. If something is erosive and not nepalese then it is worldwide. If something is cubist then it is worldwide. If Daryn is putrid and Daryn is worldwide then Daryn is carousing. Guendolen is cubist.", "logic": "\nCubist(daryn)\nErosive(daryn)\nCarousing(daryn)\nPutrid(daryn)\nWorldwide(daryn)\nErosive(sturgis)\nErosive(peyter)\nNepalese(peyter)\nErosive(guendolen)\nCarousing(guendolen)\nPutrid(peyter) and Erosive(peyter) -> Limited(peyter)\nforall x (Nepalese(x) -> Erosive(x))\nCarousing(sturgis) and Cubist(sturgis) -> not Nepalese(sturgis)\nWorldwide(peyter) -> not Cubist(peyter)\nforall x (Carousing(x) and not Erosive(x) -> not Worldwide(x))\nforall x (Erosive(x) and not Nepalese(x) -> Worldwide(x))\nforall x (Cubist(x) -> Worldwide(x))\nPutrid(daryn) and Worldwide(daryn) -> Carousing(daryn)\n\nCubist(guendolen)\n\nCubist(guendolen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3444"} {"premises": "Nicholle is dirigible. Hans is recursive. Hollie is pernickety. Red people are not civil. Nicholle is dirigible.", "logic": "\nDirigible(nicholle)\nRecursive(hans)\nPernickety(hollie)\nforall x (Pernickety(x) -> not Civil(x))\n\nDirigible(nicholle)\n\ntherefore Dirigible(nicholle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "Tammy is stiff. Glynnis is counter. Craig is polychrome. Red people are not booted. Glynnis is not counter.", "logic": "\nStiff(tammy)\nCounter(glynnis)\nPolychrome(craig)\nforall x (Polychrome(x) -> not Booted(x))\n\nnot Counter(glynnis)\n\ntherefore Counter(glynnis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "Fletcher is supporting. Sher is aeschylean. Tucker is homeward. Red people are not capitulary. Tucker is not capitulary.", "logic": "\nSupporting(fletcher)\nAeschylean(sher)\nHomeward(tucker)\nforall x (Homeward(x) -> not Capitulary(x))\n\nnot Capitulary(tucker)\n\nHomeward(tucker) and forall x (Homeward(x) -> not Capitulary(x)) -> therefore not Capitulary(tucker)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "Wendeline is unworthy. Tamra is nonhairy. Jervis is aculeated. Red people are not brattish. Jervis is brattish.", "logic": "\nUnworthy(wendeline)\nNonhairy(tamra)\nAculeated(jervis)\nforall x (Aculeated(x) -> not Brattish(x))\n\nBrattish(jervis)\n\nAculeated(jervis) and forall x (Aculeated(x) -> not Brattish(x)) -> therefore not Brattish(jervis)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "Nickey is lymphoid. Witty is warlike. Herve is implacable. Red people are not subversive. Nickey is not green.", "logic": "\nLymphoid(nickey)\nWarlike(witty)\nImplacable(herve)\nforall x (Implacable(x) -> not Subversive(x))\n\nnot Green(nickey)\n\nnot Green(nickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "Say is completing. Denys is cheesy. Debera is soprano. Red people are not equatorial. Debera is green.", "logic": "\nCompleting(say)\nCheesy(denys)\nSoprano(debera)\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> not Equatorial(x))\n\nGreen(debera)\n\nGreen(debera) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "Joyce is bright. Valeda is curved. Noella is invasive. Red people are not credulous. Valeda is not green.", "logic": "\nBright(joyce)\nCurved(valeda)\nInvasive(noella)\nforall x (Invasive(x) -> not Credulous(x))\n\nnot Green(valeda)\n\nnot Green(valeda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "Anni is epitheliod. Jacquelin is bentonitic. Faun is lxxxv. Red people are not highland. Faun is quiet.", "logic": "\nEpitheliod(anni)\nBentonitic(jacquelin)\nLxxxv(faun)\nforall x (Lxxxv(x) -> not Highland(x))\n\nQuiet(faun)\n\nQuiet(faun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1954"} {"premises": "The mead cuss the alethea. The mead outrange the alethea. The mead is unvented. The mead give the catharine. The mead give the alethea. The catharine is intoned. The catharine give the mead. The alethea cuss the catharine. The alethea outrange the mead. The alethea outrange the catharine. The alethea is exodontic. The alethea is shut. The alethea is unvented. The alethea is fraternal. The alethea give the mead. The alethea give the catharine. If something give the catharine then it outrange the catharine. If something is exodontic then it give the catharine. If something cuss the alethea and it give the catharine then it cuss the catharine. If the alethea is shut and the alethea outrange the catharine then the catharine is exodontic. If the alethea cuss the mead then the alethea outrange the mead. If something is intoned and it outrange the alethea then it cuss the catharine. The mead give the alethea.", "logic": "\nCuss(mead, alethea)\nOutrange(mead, alethea)\nUnvented(mead)\nGive(mead, catharine)\nGive(mead, alethea)\nIntoned(catharine)\nGive(catharine, mead)\nCuss(alethea, catharine)\nOutrange(alethea, mead)\nOutrange(alethea, catharine)\nExodontic(alethea)\nShut(alethea)\nUnvented(alethea)\nFraternal(alethea)\nGive(alethea, mead)\nGive(alethea, catharine)\nforall x (Give(x, catharine) -> Outrange(x, catharine))\nforall x (Exodontic(x) -> Give(x, catharine))\nforall x (Cuss(x, alethea) and Give(x, catharine) -> Cuss(x, catharine))\nShut(alethea) and Outrange(alethea, catharine) -> Exodontic(catharine)\nCuss(alethea, mead) -> Outrange(alethea, mead)\nforall x (Intoned(x) and Outrange(x, alethea) -> Cuss(x, catharine))\n\nGive(mead, alethea)\n\ntherefore Give(mead, alethea)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The florencia postpone the merola. The florencia twill the merola. The florencia is pedal. The florencia tingle the yank. The florencia tingle the merola. The yank is berrylike. The yank tingle the florencia. The merola postpone the yank. The merola twill the florencia. The merola twill the yank. The merola is starry. The merola is clayey. The merola is pedal. The merola is geophytic. The merola tingle the florencia. The merola tingle the yank. If something tingle the yank then it twill the yank. If something is starry then it tingle the yank. If something postpone the merola and it tingle the yank then it postpone the yank. If the merola is clayey and the merola twill the yank then the yank is starry. If the merola postpone the florencia then the merola twill the florencia. If something is berrylike and it twill the merola then it postpone the yank. The yank is not berrylike.", "logic": "\nPostpone(florencia, merola)\nTwill(florencia, merola)\nPedal(florencia)\nTingle(florencia, yank)\nTingle(florencia, merola)\nBerrylike(yank)\nTingle(yank, florencia)\nPostpone(merola, yank)\nTwill(merola, florencia)\nTwill(merola, yank)\nStarry(merola)\nClayey(merola)\nPedal(merola)\nGeophytic(merola)\nTingle(merola, florencia)\nTingle(merola, yank)\nforall x (Tingle(x, yank) -> Twill(x, yank))\nforall x (Starry(x) -> Tingle(x, yank))\nforall x (Postpone(x, merola) and Tingle(x, yank) -> Postpone(x, yank))\nClayey(merola) and Twill(merola, yank) -> Starry(yank)\nPostpone(merola, florencia) -> Twill(merola, florencia)\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and Twill(x, merola) -> Postpone(x, yank))\n\nnot Berrylike(yank)\n\ntherefore Berrylike(yank)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The celeste muddy the adger. The celeste maul the adger. The celeste is pureblood. The celeste backslide the lilian. The celeste backslide the adger. The lilian is divergent. The lilian backslide the celeste. The adger muddy the lilian. The adger maul the celeste. The adger maul the lilian. The adger is pistillate. The adger is focal. The adger is pureblood. The adger is drastic. The adger backslide the celeste. The adger backslide the lilian. If something backslide the lilian then it maul the lilian. If something is pistillate then it backslide the lilian. If something muddy the adger and it backslide the lilian then it muddy the lilian. If the adger is focal and the adger maul the lilian then the lilian is pistillate. If the adger muddy the celeste then the adger maul the celeste. If something is divergent and it maul the adger then it muddy the lilian. The celeste maul the lilian.", "logic": "\nMuddy(celeste, adger)\nMaul(celeste, adger)\nPureblood(celeste)\nBackslide(celeste, lilian)\nBackslide(celeste, adger)\nDivergent(lilian)\nBackslide(lilian, celeste)\nMuddy(adger, lilian)\nMaul(adger, celeste)\nMaul(adger, lilian)\nPistillate(adger)\nFocal(adger)\nPureblood(adger)\nDrastic(adger)\nBackslide(adger, celeste)\nBackslide(adger, lilian)\nforall x (Backslide(x, lilian) -> Maul(x, lilian))\nforall x (Pistillate(x) -> Backslide(x, lilian))\nforall x (Muddy(x, adger) and Backslide(x, lilian) -> Muddy(x, lilian))\nFocal(adger) and Maul(adger, lilian) -> Pistillate(lilian)\nMuddy(adger, celeste) -> Maul(adger, celeste)\nforall x (Divergent(x) and Maul(x, adger) -> Muddy(x, lilian))\n\nMaul(celeste, lilian)\n\nBackslide(celeste, lilian) and forall x (Backslide(x, lilian) -> Maul(x, lilian)) -> therefore Maul(celeste, lilian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The porter scandalise the raine. The porter engorge the raine. The porter is chinless. The porter morph the rodrigo. The porter morph the raine. The rodrigo is vedic. The rodrigo morph the porter. The raine scandalise the rodrigo. The raine engorge the porter. The raine engorge the rodrigo. The raine is savage. The raine is paunchy. The raine is chinless. The raine is cruel. The raine morph the porter. The raine morph the rodrigo. If something morph the rodrigo then it engorge the rodrigo. If something is savage then it morph the rodrigo. If something scandalise the raine and it morph the rodrigo then it scandalise the rodrigo. If the raine is paunchy and the raine engorge the rodrigo then the rodrigo is savage. If the raine scandalise the porter then the raine engorge the porter. If something is vedic and it engorge the raine then it scandalise the rodrigo. The rodrigo is not savage.", "logic": "\nScandalise(porter, raine)\nEngorge(porter, raine)\nChinless(porter)\nMorph(porter, rodrigo)\nMorph(porter, raine)\nVedic(rodrigo)\nMorph(rodrigo, porter)\nScandalise(raine, rodrigo)\nEngorge(raine, porter)\nEngorge(raine, rodrigo)\nSavage(raine)\nPaunchy(raine)\nChinless(raine)\nCruel(raine)\nMorph(raine, porter)\nMorph(raine, rodrigo)\nforall x (Morph(x, rodrigo) -> Engorge(x, rodrigo))\nforall x (Savage(x) -> Morph(x, rodrigo))\nforall x (Scandalise(x, raine) and Morph(x, rodrigo) -> Scandalise(x, rodrigo))\nPaunchy(raine) and Engorge(raine, rodrigo) -> Savage(rodrigo)\nScandalise(raine, porter) -> Engorge(raine, porter)\nforall x (Vedic(x) and Engorge(x, raine) -> Scandalise(x, rodrigo))\n\nnot Savage(rodrigo)\n\nPaunchy(raine) and Engorge(raine, rodrigo) and Paunchy(raine) and Engorge(raine, rodrigo) -> Savage(rodrigo) -> therefore Savage(rodrigo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The ronnie angle the conroy. The ronnie flavor the conroy. The ronnie is focal. The ronnie shed the ophelia. The ronnie shed the conroy. The ophelia is ashen. The ophelia shed the ronnie. The conroy angle the ophelia. The conroy flavor the ronnie. The conroy flavor the ophelia. The conroy is aperient. The conroy is affixial. The conroy is focal. The conroy is pale. The conroy shed the ronnie. The conroy shed the ophelia. If something shed the ophelia then it flavor the ophelia. If something is aperient then it shed the ophelia. If something angle the conroy and it shed the ophelia then it angle the ophelia. If the conroy is affixial and the conroy flavor the ophelia then the ophelia is aperient. If the conroy angle the ronnie then the conroy flavor the ronnie. If something is ashen and it flavor the conroy then it angle the ophelia. The ophelia shed the ophelia.", "logic": "\nAngle(ronnie, conroy)\nFlavor(ronnie, conroy)\nFocal(ronnie)\nShed(ronnie, ophelia)\nShed(ronnie, conroy)\nAshen(ophelia)\nShed(ophelia, ronnie)\nAngle(conroy, ophelia)\nFlavor(conroy, ronnie)\nFlavor(conroy, ophelia)\nAperient(conroy)\nAffixial(conroy)\nFocal(conroy)\nPale(conroy)\nShed(conroy, ronnie)\nShed(conroy, ophelia)\nforall x (Shed(x, ophelia) -> Flavor(x, ophelia))\nforall x (Aperient(x) -> Shed(x, ophelia))\nforall x (Angle(x, conroy) and Shed(x, ophelia) -> Angle(x, ophelia))\nAffixial(conroy) and Flavor(conroy, ophelia) -> Aperient(ophelia)\nAngle(conroy, ronnie) -> Flavor(conroy, ronnie)\nforall x (Ashen(x) and Flavor(x, conroy) -> Angle(x, ophelia))\n\nShed(ophelia, ophelia)\n\nAffixial(conroy) and Flavor(conroy, ophelia) and Affixial(conroy) and Flavor(conroy, ophelia) -> Aperient(ophelia) -> therefore Aperient(ophelia) Aperient(ophelia) and forall x (Aperient(x) -> Shed(x, ophelia)) -> therefore Shed(ophelia, ophelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The wit hanker the berni. The wit stylize the berni. The wit is corinthian. The wit homogenise the mitchael. The wit homogenise the berni. The mitchael is lemony. The mitchael homogenise the wit. The berni hanker the mitchael. The berni stylize the wit. The berni stylize the mitchael. The berni is painful. The berni is thalloid. The berni is corinthian. The berni is structured. The berni homogenise the wit. The berni homogenise the mitchael. If something homogenise the mitchael then it stylize the mitchael. If something is painful then it homogenise the mitchael. If something hanker the berni and it homogenise the mitchael then it hanker the mitchael. If the berni is thalloid and the berni stylize the mitchael then the mitchael is painful. If the berni hanker the wit then the berni stylize the wit. If something is lemony and it stylize the berni then it hanker the mitchael. The mitchael does not like the mitchael.", "logic": "\nHanker(wit, berni)\nStylize(wit, berni)\nCorinthian(wit)\nHomogenise(wit, mitchael)\nHomogenise(wit, berni)\nLemony(mitchael)\nHomogenise(mitchael, wit)\nHanker(berni, mitchael)\nStylize(berni, wit)\nStylize(berni, mitchael)\nPainful(berni)\nThalloid(berni)\nCorinthian(berni)\nStructured(berni)\nHomogenise(berni, wit)\nHomogenise(berni, mitchael)\nforall x (Homogenise(x, mitchael) -> Stylize(x, mitchael))\nforall x (Painful(x) -> Homogenise(x, mitchael))\nforall x (Hanker(x, berni) and Homogenise(x, mitchael) -> Hanker(x, mitchael))\nThalloid(berni) and Stylize(berni, mitchael) -> Painful(mitchael)\nHanker(berni, wit) -> Stylize(berni, wit)\nforall x (Lemony(x) and Stylize(x, berni) -> Hanker(x, mitchael))\n\nnot Homogenise(mitchael, mitchael)\n\nThalloid(berni) and Stylize(berni, mitchael) and Thalloid(berni) and Stylize(berni, mitchael) -> Painful(mitchael) -> therefore Painful(mitchael) Painful(mitchael) and forall x (Painful(x) -> Homogenise(x, mitchael)) -> therefore Homogenise(mitchael, mitchael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The ginny evoke the darius. The ginny enamour the darius. The ginny is scholastic. The ginny catenate the maryl. The ginny catenate the darius. The maryl is burdensome. The maryl catenate the ginny. The darius evoke the maryl. The darius enamour the ginny. The darius enamour the maryl. The darius is adpressed. The darius is jubilant. The darius is scholastic. The darius is aflame. The darius catenate the ginny. The darius catenate the maryl. If something catenate the maryl then it enamour the maryl. If something is adpressed then it catenate the maryl. If something evoke the darius and it catenate the maryl then it evoke the maryl. If the darius is jubilant and the darius enamour the maryl then the maryl is adpressed. If the darius evoke the ginny then the darius enamour the ginny. If something is burdensome and it enamour the darius then it evoke the maryl. The maryl enamour the maryl.", "logic": "\nEvoke(ginny, darius)\nEnamour(ginny, darius)\nScholastic(ginny)\nCatenate(ginny, maryl)\nCatenate(ginny, darius)\nBurdensome(maryl)\nCatenate(maryl, ginny)\nEvoke(darius, maryl)\nEnamour(darius, ginny)\nEnamour(darius, maryl)\nAdpressed(darius)\nJubilant(darius)\nScholastic(darius)\nAflame(darius)\nCatenate(darius, ginny)\nCatenate(darius, maryl)\nforall x (Catenate(x, maryl) -> Enamour(x, maryl))\nforall x (Adpressed(x) -> Catenate(x, maryl))\nforall x (Evoke(x, darius) and Catenate(x, maryl) -> Evoke(x, maryl))\nJubilant(darius) and Enamour(darius, maryl) -> Adpressed(maryl)\nEvoke(darius, ginny) -> Enamour(darius, ginny)\nforall x (Burdensome(x) and Enamour(x, darius) -> Evoke(x, maryl))\n\nEnamour(maryl, maryl)\n\nJubilant(darius) and Enamour(darius, maryl) and Jubilant(darius) and Enamour(darius, maryl) -> Adpressed(maryl) -> therefore Adpressed(maryl) Adpressed(maryl) and forall x (Adpressed(x) -> Catenate(x, maryl)) -> therefore Catenate(maryl, maryl) Catenate(maryl, maryl) and forall x (Catenate(x, maryl) -> Enamour(x, maryl)) -> therefore Enamour(maryl, maryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The ronica sprawl the locke. The ronica illumine the locke. The ronica is untreated. The ronica predicate the linn. The ronica predicate the locke. The linn is frayed. The linn predicate the ronica. The locke sprawl the linn. The locke illumine the ronica. The locke illumine the linn. The locke is lumpish. The locke is dimmed. The locke is untreated. The locke is modal. The locke predicate the ronica. The locke predicate the linn. If something predicate the linn then it illumine the linn. If something is lumpish then it predicate the linn. If something sprawl the locke and it predicate the linn then it sprawl the linn. If the locke is dimmed and the locke illumine the linn then the linn is lumpish. If the locke sprawl the ronica then the locke illumine the ronica. If something is frayed and it illumine the locke then it sprawl the linn. The linn does not eat the linn.", "logic": "\nSprawl(ronica, locke)\nIllumine(ronica, locke)\nUntreated(ronica)\nPredicate(ronica, linn)\nPredicate(ronica, locke)\nFrayed(linn)\nPredicate(linn, ronica)\nSprawl(locke, linn)\nIllumine(locke, ronica)\nIllumine(locke, linn)\nLumpish(locke)\nDimmed(locke)\nUntreated(locke)\nModal(locke)\nPredicate(locke, ronica)\nPredicate(locke, linn)\nforall x (Predicate(x, linn) -> Illumine(x, linn))\nforall x (Lumpish(x) -> Predicate(x, linn))\nforall x (Sprawl(x, locke) and Predicate(x, linn) -> Sprawl(x, linn))\nDimmed(locke) and Illumine(locke, linn) -> Lumpish(linn)\nSprawl(locke, ronica) -> Illumine(locke, ronica)\nforall x (Frayed(x) and Illumine(x, locke) -> Sprawl(x, linn))\n\nnot Illumine(linn, linn)\n\nDimmed(locke) and Illumine(locke, linn) and Dimmed(locke) and Illumine(locke, linn) -> Lumpish(linn) -> therefore Lumpish(linn) Lumpish(linn) and forall x (Lumpish(x) -> Predicate(x, linn)) -> therefore Predicate(linn, linn) Predicate(linn, linn) and forall x (Predicate(x, linn) -> Illumine(x, linn)) -> therefore Illumine(linn, linn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The huntley underspend the selie. The huntley drive the selie. The huntley is censored. The huntley ripple the diannne. The huntley ripple the selie. The diannne is uninvited. The diannne ripple the huntley. The selie underspend the diannne. The selie drive the huntley. The selie drive the diannne. The selie is areolate. The selie is spikelike. The selie is censored. The selie is tsarist. The selie ripple the huntley. The selie ripple the diannne. If something ripple the diannne then it drive the diannne. If something is areolate then it ripple the diannne. If something underspend the selie and it ripple the diannne then it underspend the diannne. If the selie is spikelike and the selie drive the diannne then the diannne is areolate. If the selie underspend the huntley then the selie drive the huntley. If something is uninvited and it drive the selie then it underspend the diannne. The diannne does not chase the diannne.", "logic": "\nUnderspend(huntley, selie)\nDrive(huntley, selie)\nCensored(huntley)\nRipple(huntley, diannne)\nRipple(huntley, selie)\nUninvited(diannne)\nRipple(diannne, huntley)\nUnderspend(selie, diannne)\nDrive(selie, huntley)\nDrive(selie, diannne)\nAreolate(selie)\nSpikelike(selie)\nCensored(selie)\nTsarist(selie)\nRipple(selie, huntley)\nRipple(selie, diannne)\nforall x (Ripple(x, diannne) -> Drive(x, diannne))\nforall x (Areolate(x) -> Ripple(x, diannne))\nforall x (Underspend(x, selie) and Ripple(x, diannne) -> Underspend(x, diannne))\nSpikelike(selie) and Drive(selie, diannne) -> Areolate(diannne)\nUnderspend(selie, huntley) -> Drive(selie, huntley)\nforall x (Uninvited(x) and Drive(x, selie) -> Underspend(x, diannne))\n\nnot Underspend(diannne, diannne)\n\nforall x (Underspend(x, selie) and Ripple(x, diannne) -> Underspend(x, diannne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The tristan perform the sarette. The tristan gull the sarette. The tristan is rhythmic. The tristan mishandle the kenna. The tristan mishandle the sarette. The kenna is definable. The kenna mishandle the tristan. The sarette perform the kenna. The sarette gull the tristan. The sarette gull the kenna. The sarette is frosted. The sarette is unsoiled. The sarette is rhythmic. The sarette is overjoyed. The sarette mishandle the tristan. The sarette mishandle the kenna. If something mishandle the kenna then it gull the kenna. If something is frosted then it mishandle the kenna. If something perform the sarette and it mishandle the kenna then it perform the kenna. If the sarette is unsoiled and the sarette gull the kenna then the kenna is frosted. If the sarette perform the tristan then the sarette gull the tristan. If something is definable and it gull the sarette then it perform the kenna. The tristan is frosted.", "logic": "\nPerform(tristan, sarette)\nGull(tristan, sarette)\nRhythmic(tristan)\nMishandle(tristan, kenna)\nMishandle(tristan, sarette)\nDefinable(kenna)\nMishandle(kenna, tristan)\nPerform(sarette, kenna)\nGull(sarette, tristan)\nGull(sarette, kenna)\nFrosted(sarette)\nUnsoiled(sarette)\nRhythmic(sarette)\nOverjoyed(sarette)\nMishandle(sarette, tristan)\nMishandle(sarette, kenna)\nforall x (Mishandle(x, kenna) -> Gull(x, kenna))\nforall x (Frosted(x) -> Mishandle(x, kenna))\nforall x (Perform(x, sarette) and Mishandle(x, kenna) -> Perform(x, kenna))\nUnsoiled(sarette) and Gull(sarette, kenna) -> Frosted(kenna)\nPerform(sarette, tristan) -> Gull(sarette, tristan)\nforall x (Definable(x) and Gull(x, sarette) -> Perform(x, kenna))\n\nFrosted(tristan)\n\nFrosted(tristan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The abbi jitterbug the halette. The abbi gawk the halette. The abbi is cyclopean. The abbi multiply the thekla. The abbi multiply the halette. The thekla is cursive. The thekla multiply the abbi. The halette jitterbug the thekla. The halette gawk the abbi. The halette gawk the thekla. The halette is magnetized. The halette is motorial. The halette is cyclopean. The halette is nosey. The halette multiply the abbi. The halette multiply the thekla. If something multiply the thekla then it gawk the thekla. If something is magnetized then it multiply the thekla. If something jitterbug the halette and it multiply the thekla then it jitterbug the thekla. If the halette is motorial and the halette gawk the thekla then the thekla is magnetized. If the halette jitterbug the abbi then the halette gawk the abbi. If something is cursive and it gawk the halette then it jitterbug the thekla. The halette does not chase the abbi.", "logic": "\nJitterbug(abbi, halette)\nGawk(abbi, halette)\nCyclopean(abbi)\nMultiply(abbi, thekla)\nMultiply(abbi, halette)\nCursive(thekla)\nMultiply(thekla, abbi)\nJitterbug(halette, thekla)\nGawk(halette, abbi)\nGawk(halette, thekla)\nMagnetized(halette)\nMotorial(halette)\nCyclopean(halette)\nNosey(halette)\nMultiply(halette, abbi)\nMultiply(halette, thekla)\nforall x (Multiply(x, thekla) -> Gawk(x, thekla))\nforall x (Magnetized(x) -> Multiply(x, thekla))\nforall x (Jitterbug(x, halette) and Multiply(x, thekla) -> Jitterbug(x, thekla))\nMotorial(halette) and Gawk(halette, thekla) -> Magnetized(thekla)\nJitterbug(halette, abbi) -> Gawk(halette, abbi)\nforall x (Cursive(x) and Gawk(x, halette) -> Jitterbug(x, thekla))\n\nnot Jitterbug(halette, abbi)\n\nnot Jitterbug(halette, abbi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The thelma down the sabrina. The thelma westernize the sabrina. The thelma is winged. The thelma execute the annamarie. The thelma execute the sabrina. The annamarie is bladdery. The annamarie execute the thelma. The sabrina down the annamarie. The sabrina westernize the thelma. The sabrina westernize the annamarie. The sabrina is flagrant. The sabrina is chartered. The sabrina is winged. The sabrina is crisscross. The sabrina execute the thelma. The sabrina execute the annamarie. If something execute the annamarie then it westernize the annamarie. If something is flagrant then it execute the annamarie. If something down the sabrina and it execute the annamarie then it down the annamarie. If the sabrina is chartered and the sabrina westernize the annamarie then the annamarie is flagrant. If the sabrina down the thelma then the sabrina westernize the thelma. If something is bladdery and it westernize the sabrina then it down the annamarie. The sabrina down the sabrina.", "logic": "\nDown(thelma, sabrina)\nWesternize(thelma, sabrina)\nWinged(thelma)\nExecute(thelma, annamarie)\nExecute(thelma, sabrina)\nBladdery(annamarie)\nExecute(annamarie, thelma)\nDown(sabrina, annamarie)\nWesternize(sabrina, thelma)\nWesternize(sabrina, annamarie)\nFlagrant(sabrina)\nChartered(sabrina)\nWinged(sabrina)\nCrisscross(sabrina)\nExecute(sabrina, thelma)\nExecute(sabrina, annamarie)\nforall x (Execute(x, annamarie) -> Westernize(x, annamarie))\nforall x (Flagrant(x) -> Execute(x, annamarie))\nforall x (Down(x, sabrina) and Execute(x, annamarie) -> Down(x, annamarie))\nChartered(sabrina) and Westernize(sabrina, annamarie) -> Flagrant(annamarie)\nDown(sabrina, thelma) -> Westernize(sabrina, thelma)\nforall x (Bladdery(x) and Westernize(x, sabrina) -> Down(x, annamarie))\n\nDown(sabrina, sabrina)\n\nDown(sabrina, sabrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The rinaldo reboot the darien. The rinaldo elegise the darien. The rinaldo is bailable. The rinaldo jellify the leila. The rinaldo jellify the darien. The leila is guileful. The leila jellify the rinaldo. The darien reboot the leila. The darien elegise the rinaldo. The darien elegise the leila. The darien is prostate. The darien is scatty. The darien is bailable. The darien is windburnt. The darien jellify the rinaldo. The darien jellify the leila. If something jellify the leila then it elegise the leila. If something is prostate then it jellify the leila. If something reboot the darien and it jellify the leila then it reboot the leila. If the darien is scatty and the darien elegise the leila then the leila is prostate. If the darien reboot the rinaldo then the darien elegise the rinaldo. If something is guileful and it elegise the darien then it reboot the leila. The leila does not like the darien.", "logic": "\nReboot(rinaldo, darien)\nElegise(rinaldo, darien)\nBailable(rinaldo)\nJellify(rinaldo, leila)\nJellify(rinaldo, darien)\nGuileful(leila)\nJellify(leila, rinaldo)\nReboot(darien, leila)\nElegise(darien, rinaldo)\nElegise(darien, leila)\nProstate(darien)\nScatty(darien)\nBailable(darien)\nWindburnt(darien)\nJellify(darien, rinaldo)\nJellify(darien, leila)\nforall x (Jellify(x, leila) -> Elegise(x, leila))\nforall x (Prostate(x) -> Jellify(x, leila))\nforall x (Reboot(x, darien) and Jellify(x, leila) -> Reboot(x, leila))\nScatty(darien) and Elegise(darien, leila) -> Prostate(leila)\nReboot(darien, rinaldo) -> Elegise(darien, rinaldo)\nforall x (Guileful(x) and Elegise(x, darien) -> Reboot(x, leila))\n\nnot Jellify(leila, darien)\n\nnot Jellify(leila, darien) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The franni barb the ritch. The franni overlap the ritch. The franni is limacoid. The franni belt the codee. The franni belt the ritch. The codee is seeming. The codee belt the franni. The ritch barb the codee. The ritch overlap the franni. The ritch overlap the codee. The ritch is voguish. The ritch is faceted. The ritch is limacoid. The ritch is accurate. The ritch belt the franni. The ritch belt the codee. If something belt the codee then it overlap the codee. If something is voguish then it belt the codee. If something barb the ritch and it belt the codee then it barb the codee. If the ritch is faceted and the ritch overlap the codee then the codee is voguish. If the ritch barb the franni then the ritch overlap the franni. If something is seeming and it overlap the ritch then it barb the codee. The ritch belt the ritch.", "logic": "\nBarb(franni, ritch)\nOverlap(franni, ritch)\nLimacoid(franni)\nBelt(franni, codee)\nBelt(franni, ritch)\nSeeming(codee)\nBelt(codee, franni)\nBarb(ritch, codee)\nOverlap(ritch, franni)\nOverlap(ritch, codee)\nVoguish(ritch)\nFaceted(ritch)\nLimacoid(ritch)\nAccurate(ritch)\nBelt(ritch, franni)\nBelt(ritch, codee)\nforall x (Belt(x, codee) -> Overlap(x, codee))\nforall x (Voguish(x) -> Belt(x, codee))\nforall x (Barb(x, ritch) and Belt(x, codee) -> Barb(x, codee))\nFaceted(ritch) and Overlap(ritch, codee) -> Voguish(codee)\nBarb(ritch, franni) -> Overlap(ritch, franni)\nforall x (Seeming(x) and Overlap(x, ritch) -> Barb(x, codee))\n\nBelt(ritch, ritch)\n\nBelt(ritch, ritch) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The pammy locate the susette. The pammy guide the susette. The pammy is jetting. The pammy orientate the nova. The pammy orientate the susette. The nova is plummy. The nova orientate the pammy. The susette locate the nova. The susette guide the pammy. The susette guide the nova. The susette is insectan. The susette is removed. The susette is jetting. The susette is incapable. The susette orientate the pammy. The susette orientate the nova. If something orientate the nova then it guide the nova. If something is insectan then it orientate the nova. If something locate the susette and it orientate the nova then it locate the nova. If the susette is removed and the susette guide the nova then the nova is insectan. If the susette locate the pammy then the susette guide the pammy. If something is plummy and it guide the susette then it locate the nova. The pammy is not removed.", "logic": "\nLocate(pammy, susette)\nGuide(pammy, susette)\nJetting(pammy)\nOrientate(pammy, nova)\nOrientate(pammy, susette)\nPlummy(nova)\nOrientate(nova, pammy)\nLocate(susette, nova)\nGuide(susette, pammy)\nGuide(susette, nova)\nInsectan(susette)\nRemoved(susette)\nJetting(susette)\nIncapable(susette)\nOrientate(susette, pammy)\nOrientate(susette, nova)\nforall x (Orientate(x, nova) -> Guide(x, nova))\nforall x (Insectan(x) -> Orientate(x, nova))\nforall x (Locate(x, susette) and Orientate(x, nova) -> Locate(x, nova))\nRemoved(susette) and Guide(susette, nova) -> Insectan(nova)\nLocate(susette, pammy) -> Guide(susette, pammy)\nforall x (Plummy(x) and Guide(x, susette) -> Locate(x, nova))\n\nnot Removed(pammy)\n\nnot Removed(pammy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "The alethea step the jada. The alethea hallow the jada. The alethea is jolting. The alethea rebuke the renate. The alethea rebuke the jada. The renate is repeated. The renate rebuke the alethea. The jada step the renate. The jada hallow the alethea. The jada hallow the renate. The jada is unlikeable. The jada is niffy. The jada is jolting. The jada is athirst. The jada rebuke the alethea. The jada rebuke the renate. If something rebuke the renate then it hallow the renate. If something is unlikeable then it rebuke the renate. If something step the jada and it rebuke the renate then it step the renate. If the jada is niffy and the jada hallow the renate then the renate is unlikeable. If the jada step the alethea then the jada hallow the alethea. If something is repeated and it hallow the jada then it step the renate. The renate is niffy.", "logic": "\nStep(alethea, jada)\nHallow(alethea, jada)\nJolting(alethea)\nRebuke(alethea, renate)\nRebuke(alethea, jada)\nRepeated(renate)\nRebuke(renate, alethea)\nStep(jada, renate)\nHallow(jada, alethea)\nHallow(jada, renate)\nUnlikeable(jada)\nNiffy(jada)\nJolting(jada)\nAthirst(jada)\nRebuke(jada, alethea)\nRebuke(jada, renate)\nforall x (Rebuke(x, renate) -> Hallow(x, renate))\nforall x (Unlikeable(x) -> Rebuke(x, renate))\nforall x (Step(x, jada) and Rebuke(x, renate) -> Step(x, renate))\nNiffy(jada) and Hallow(jada, renate) -> Unlikeable(renate)\nStep(jada, alethea) -> Hallow(jada, alethea)\nforall x (Repeated(x) and Hallow(x, jada) -> Step(x, renate))\n\nNiffy(renate)\n\nNiffy(renate) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-236"} {"premises": "Morten is robotic. Morten is fatheaded. Morten is arabic. Morten is favored. Amalee is drinkable. Amalee is robotic. Amalee is fatheaded. Amalee is not arabic. Amalee is not carroty. Clive is drinkable. Clive is arabic. Clive is estuarial. All robotic people are fatheaded. White, drinkable people are robotic. If someone is drinkable then they are favored. Big people are favored. If Morten is drinkable and Morten is not estuarial then Morten is not robotic. If someone is fatheaded and not robotic then they are not carroty. Amalee is not carroty.", "logic": "\nRobotic(morten)\nFatheaded(morten)\nArabic(morten)\nFavored(morten)\nDrinkable(amalee)\nRobotic(amalee)\nFatheaded(amalee)\nnot Arabic(amalee)\nnot Carroty(amalee)\nDrinkable(clive)\nArabic(clive)\nEstuarial(clive)\nforall x (Robotic(x) -> Fatheaded(x))\nforall x (Favored(x) and Drinkable(x) -> Robotic(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) -> Favored(x))\nforall x (Drinkable(x) -> Favored(x))\nDrinkable(morten) and not Estuarial(morten) -> not Robotic(morten)\nforall x (Fatheaded(x) and not Robotic(x) -> not Carroty(x))\n\nnot Carroty(amalee)\n\ntherefore not Carroty(amalee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Stevy is luckless. Stevy is insidious. Stevy is meteoric. Stevy is apian. Coral is connubial. Coral is luckless. Coral is insidious. Coral is not meteoric. Coral is not solomonic. Terrence is connubial. Terrence is meteoric. Terrence is kurdish. All luckless people are insidious. White, connubial people are luckless. If someone is connubial then they are apian. Big people are apian. If Stevy is connubial and Stevy is not kurdish then Stevy is not luckless. If someone is insidious and not luckless then they are not solomonic. Stevy is not luckless.", "logic": "\nLuckless(stevy)\nInsidious(stevy)\nMeteoric(stevy)\nApian(stevy)\nConnubial(coral)\nLuckless(coral)\nInsidious(coral)\nnot Meteoric(coral)\nnot Solomonic(coral)\nConnubial(terrence)\nMeteoric(terrence)\nKurdish(terrence)\nforall x (Luckless(x) -> Insidious(x))\nforall x (Apian(x) and Connubial(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Connubial(x) -> Apian(x))\nforall x (Connubial(x) -> Apian(x))\nConnubial(stevy) and not Kurdish(stevy) -> not Luckless(stevy)\nforall x (Insidious(x) and not Luckless(x) -> not Solomonic(x))\n\nnot Luckless(stevy)\n\ntherefore Luckless(stevy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Audre is footless. Audre is enigmatic. Audre is aphetic. Audre is radiopaque. Poppy is semidark. Poppy is footless. Poppy is enigmatic. Poppy is not aphetic. Poppy is not unshaved. Adele is semidark. Adele is aphetic. Adele is genteel. All footless people are enigmatic. White, semidark people are footless. If someone is semidark then they are radiopaque. Big people are radiopaque. If Audre is semidark and Audre is not genteel then Audre is not footless. If someone is enigmatic and not footless then they are not unshaved. Poppy is radiopaque.", "logic": "\nFootless(audre)\nEnigmatic(audre)\nAphetic(audre)\nRadiopaque(audre)\nSemidark(poppy)\nFootless(poppy)\nEnigmatic(poppy)\nnot Aphetic(poppy)\nnot Unshaved(poppy)\nSemidark(adele)\nAphetic(adele)\nGenteel(adele)\nforall x (Footless(x) -> Enigmatic(x))\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) and Semidark(x) -> Footless(x))\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Radiopaque(x))\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Radiopaque(x))\nSemidark(audre) and not Genteel(audre) -> not Footless(audre)\nforall x (Enigmatic(x) and not Footless(x) -> not Unshaved(x))\n\nRadiopaque(poppy)\n\nSemidark(poppy) and forall x (Semidark(x) -> Radiopaque(x)) -> therefore Radiopaque(poppy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Tye is unthawed. Tye is taoist. Tye is untasted. Tye is victimized. Ottilie is prandial. Ottilie is unthawed. Ottilie is taoist. Ottilie is not untasted. Ottilie is not nurturant. Margeaux is prandial. Margeaux is untasted. Margeaux is executable. All unthawed people are taoist. White, prandial people are unthawed. If someone is prandial then they are victimized. Big people are victimized. If Tye is prandial and Tye is not executable then Tye is not unthawed. If someone is taoist and not unthawed then they are not nurturant. Ottilie is not victimized.", "logic": "\nUnthawed(tye)\nTaoist(tye)\nUntasted(tye)\nVictimized(tye)\nPrandial(ottilie)\nUnthawed(ottilie)\nTaoist(ottilie)\nnot Untasted(ottilie)\nnot Nurturant(ottilie)\nPrandial(margeaux)\nUntasted(margeaux)\nExecutable(margeaux)\nforall x (Unthawed(x) -> Taoist(x))\nforall x (Victimized(x) and Prandial(x) -> Unthawed(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) -> Victimized(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) -> Victimized(x))\nPrandial(tye) and not Executable(tye) -> not Unthawed(tye)\nforall x (Taoist(x) and not Unthawed(x) -> not Nurturant(x))\n\nnot Victimized(ottilie)\n\nPrandial(ottilie) and forall x (Prandial(x) -> Victimized(x)) -> therefore Victimized(ottilie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Rivkah is anesthetic. Rivkah is rotary. Rivkah is driving. Rivkah is conscious. Fortuna is grecian. Fortuna is anesthetic. Fortuna is rotary. Fortuna is not driving. Fortuna is not extradural. Carmon is grecian. Carmon is driving. Carmon is ocellated. All anesthetic people are rotary. White, grecian people are anesthetic. If someone is grecian then they are conscious. Big people are conscious. If Rivkah is grecian and Rivkah is not ocellated then Rivkah is not anesthetic. If someone is rotary and not anesthetic then they are not extradural. Carmon is anesthetic.", "logic": "\nAnesthetic(rivkah)\nRotary(rivkah)\nDriving(rivkah)\nConscious(rivkah)\nGrecian(fortuna)\nAnesthetic(fortuna)\nRotary(fortuna)\nnot Driving(fortuna)\nnot Extradural(fortuna)\nGrecian(carmon)\nDriving(carmon)\nOcellated(carmon)\nforall x (Anesthetic(x) -> Rotary(x))\nforall x (Conscious(x) and Grecian(x) -> Anesthetic(x))\nforall x (Grecian(x) -> Conscious(x))\nforall x (Grecian(x) -> Conscious(x))\nGrecian(rivkah) and not Ocellated(rivkah) -> not Anesthetic(rivkah)\nforall x (Rotary(x) and not Anesthetic(x) -> not Extradural(x))\n\nAnesthetic(carmon)\n\nGrecian(carmon) and forall x (Grecian(x) -> Conscious(x)) -> therefore Conscious(carmon) Conscious(carmon) and Grecian(carmon) and forall x (Conscious(x) and Grecian(x) -> Anesthetic(x)) -> therefore Anesthetic(carmon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Bartel is tensional. Bartel is monotonic. Bartel is grateful. Bartel is esurient. Bliss is untellable. Bliss is tensional. Bliss is monotonic. Bliss is not grateful. Bliss is not barky. Ediva is untellable. Ediva is grateful. Ediva is unexplored. All tensional people are monotonic. White, untellable people are tensional. If someone is untellable then they are esurient. Big people are esurient. If Bartel is untellable and Bartel is not unexplored then Bartel is not tensional. If someone is monotonic and not tensional then they are not barky. Ediva is not tensional.", "logic": "\nTensional(bartel)\nMonotonic(bartel)\nGrateful(bartel)\nEsurient(bartel)\nUntellable(bliss)\nTensional(bliss)\nMonotonic(bliss)\nnot Grateful(bliss)\nnot Barky(bliss)\nUntellable(ediva)\nGrateful(ediva)\nUnexplored(ediva)\nforall x (Tensional(x) -> Monotonic(x))\nforall x (Esurient(x) and Untellable(x) -> Tensional(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> Esurient(x))\nforall x (Untellable(x) -> Esurient(x))\nUntellable(bartel) and not Unexplored(bartel) -> not Tensional(bartel)\nforall x (Monotonic(x) and not Tensional(x) -> not Barky(x))\n\nnot Tensional(ediva)\n\nUntellable(ediva) and forall x (Untellable(x) -> Esurient(x)) -> therefore Esurient(ediva) Esurient(ediva) and Untellable(ediva) and forall x (Esurient(x) and Untellable(x) -> Tensional(x)) -> therefore Tensional(ediva)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Jeana is searing. Jeana is unsuited. Jeana is subnormal. Jeana is riming. Tonia is biased. Tonia is searing. Tonia is unsuited. Tonia is not subnormal. Tonia is not asocial. Zippy is biased. Zippy is subnormal. Zippy is iatrogenic. All searing people are unsuited. White, biased people are searing. If someone is biased then they are riming. Big people are riming. If Jeana is biased and Jeana is not iatrogenic then Jeana is not searing. If someone is unsuited and not searing then they are not asocial. Zippy is unsuited.", "logic": "\nSearing(jeana)\nUnsuited(jeana)\nSubnormal(jeana)\nRiming(jeana)\nBiased(tonia)\nSearing(tonia)\nUnsuited(tonia)\nnot Subnormal(tonia)\nnot Asocial(tonia)\nBiased(zippy)\nSubnormal(zippy)\nIatrogenic(zippy)\nforall x (Searing(x) -> Unsuited(x))\nforall x (Riming(x) and Biased(x) -> Searing(x))\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Riming(x))\nforall x (Biased(x) -> Riming(x))\nBiased(jeana) and not Iatrogenic(jeana) -> not Searing(jeana)\nforall x (Unsuited(x) and not Searing(x) -> not Asocial(x))\n\nUnsuited(zippy)\n\nBiased(zippy) and forall x (Biased(x) -> Riming(x)) -> therefore Riming(zippy) Riming(zippy) and Biased(zippy) and forall x (Riming(x) and Biased(x) -> Searing(x)) -> therefore Searing(zippy) Searing(zippy) and forall x (Searing(x) -> Unsuited(x)) -> therefore Unsuited(zippy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Walter is basined. Walter is behavioral. Walter is lanate. Walter is standby. Haydon is wordy. Haydon is basined. Haydon is behavioral. Haydon is not lanate. Haydon is not deuced. Cecily is wordy. Cecily is lanate. Cecily is mealy. All basined people are behavioral. White, wordy people are basined. If someone is wordy then they are standby. Big people are standby. If Walter is wordy and Walter is not mealy then Walter is not basined. If someone is behavioral and not basined then they are not deuced. Cecily is not behavioral.", "logic": "\nBasined(walter)\nBehavioral(walter)\nLanate(walter)\nStandby(walter)\nWordy(haydon)\nBasined(haydon)\nBehavioral(haydon)\nnot Lanate(haydon)\nnot Deuced(haydon)\nWordy(cecily)\nLanate(cecily)\nMealy(cecily)\nforall x (Basined(x) -> Behavioral(x))\nforall x (Standby(x) and Wordy(x) -> Basined(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) -> Standby(x))\nforall x (Wordy(x) -> Standby(x))\nWordy(walter) and not Mealy(walter) -> not Basined(walter)\nforall x (Behavioral(x) and not Basined(x) -> not Deuced(x))\n\nnot Behavioral(cecily)\n\nWordy(cecily) and forall x (Wordy(x) -> Standby(x)) -> therefore Standby(cecily) Standby(cecily) and Wordy(cecily) and forall x (Standby(x) and Wordy(x) -> Basined(x)) -> therefore Basined(cecily) Basined(cecily) and forall x (Basined(x) -> Behavioral(x)) -> therefore Behavioral(cecily)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Cloe is inorganic. Cloe is vanilla. Cloe is swordlike. Cloe is deweyan. Tremain is naive. Tremain is inorganic. Tremain is vanilla. Tremain is not swordlike. Tremain is not jubilant. Horacio is naive. Horacio is swordlike. Horacio is genetical. All inorganic people are vanilla. White, naive people are inorganic. If someone is naive then they are deweyan. Big people are deweyan. If Cloe is naive and Cloe is not genetical then Cloe is not inorganic. If someone is vanilla and not inorganic then they are not jubilant. Cloe is not naive.", "logic": "\nInorganic(cloe)\nVanilla(cloe)\nSwordlike(cloe)\nDeweyan(cloe)\nNaive(tremain)\nInorganic(tremain)\nVanilla(tremain)\nnot Swordlike(tremain)\nnot Jubilant(tremain)\nNaive(horacio)\nSwordlike(horacio)\nGenetical(horacio)\nforall x (Inorganic(x) -> Vanilla(x))\nforall x (Deweyan(x) and Naive(x) -> Inorganic(x))\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Deweyan(x))\nNaive(cloe) and not Genetical(cloe) -> not Inorganic(cloe)\nforall x (Vanilla(x) and not Inorganic(x) -> not Jubilant(x))\n\nnot Naive(cloe)\n\nnot Naive(cloe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Rick is republican. Rick is learned. Rick is metrical. Rick is farcical. Marney is polynesian. Marney is republican. Marney is learned. Marney is not metrical. Marney is not uncombined. Krissy is polynesian. Krissy is metrical. Krissy is sagacious. All republican people are learned. White, polynesian people are republican. If someone is polynesian then they are farcical. Big people are farcical. If Rick is polynesian and Rick is not sagacious then Rick is not republican. If someone is learned and not republican then they are not uncombined. Rick is sagacious.", "logic": "\nRepublican(rick)\nLearned(rick)\nMetrical(rick)\nFarcical(rick)\nPolynesian(marney)\nRepublican(marney)\nLearned(marney)\nnot Metrical(marney)\nnot Uncombined(marney)\nPolynesian(krissy)\nMetrical(krissy)\nSagacious(krissy)\nforall x (Republican(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Farcical(x) and Polynesian(x) -> Republican(x))\nforall x (Polynesian(x) -> Farcical(x))\nforall x (Polynesian(x) -> Farcical(x))\nPolynesian(rick) and not Sagacious(rick) -> not Republican(rick)\nforall x (Learned(x) and not Republican(x) -> not Uncombined(x))\n\nSagacious(rick)\n\nSagacious(rick) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Meara is sanguinary. Meara is bone. Meara is sanctified. Meara is pedestrian. Demetria is exilic. Demetria is sanguinary. Demetria is bone. Demetria is not sanctified. Demetria is not pictorial. Riva is exilic. Riva is sanctified. Riva is foggy. All sanguinary people are bone. White, exilic people are sanguinary. If someone is exilic then they are pedestrian. Big people are pedestrian. If Meara is exilic and Meara is not foggy then Meara is not sanguinary. If someone is bone and not sanguinary then they are not pictorial. Riva is not pictorial.", "logic": "\nSanguinary(meara)\nBone(meara)\nSanctified(meara)\nPedestrian(meara)\nExilic(demetria)\nSanguinary(demetria)\nBone(demetria)\nnot Sanctified(demetria)\nnot Pictorial(demetria)\nExilic(riva)\nSanctified(riva)\nFoggy(riva)\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> Bone(x))\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) and Exilic(x) -> Sanguinary(x))\nforall x (Exilic(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nforall x (Exilic(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nExilic(meara) and not Foggy(meara) -> not Sanguinary(meara)\nforall x (Bone(x) and not Sanguinary(x) -> not Pictorial(x))\n\nnot Pictorial(riva)\n\nnot Pictorial(riva) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "Jaine is excursive. Jaine is inclined. Jaine is sinning. Jaine is igneous. Mikhail is idle. Mikhail is excursive. Mikhail is inclined. Mikhail is not sinning. Mikhail is not done. Katerine is idle. Katerine is sinning. Katerine is austenitic. All excursive people are inclined. White, idle people are excursive. If someone is idle then they are igneous. Big people are igneous. If Jaine is idle and Jaine is not austenitic then Jaine is not excursive. If someone is inclined and not excursive then they are not done. Mikhail is austenitic.", "logic": "\nExcursive(jaine)\nInclined(jaine)\nSinning(jaine)\nIgneous(jaine)\nIdle(mikhail)\nExcursive(mikhail)\nInclined(mikhail)\nnot Sinning(mikhail)\nnot Done(mikhail)\nIdle(katerine)\nSinning(katerine)\nAustenitic(katerine)\nforall x (Excursive(x) -> Inclined(x))\nforall x (Igneous(x) and Idle(x) -> Excursive(x))\nforall x (Idle(x) -> Igneous(x))\nforall x (Idle(x) -> Igneous(x))\nIdle(jaine) and not Austenitic(jaine) -> not Excursive(jaine)\nforall x (Inclined(x) and not Excursive(x) -> not Done(x))\n\nAustenitic(mikhail)\n\nAustenitic(mikhail) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-119"} {"premises": "The nathanial is thorny. The nathanial misalign the cain. The nathanial skateboard the irving. The nathanial skateboard the cain. The irving halloo the nathanial. The irving is trustful. The irving is coetaneous. The irving is putrescent. The irving is unbarred. The irving misalign the nathanial. The irving misalign the cain. The irving skateboard the nathanial. The irving skateboard the cain. The cain halloo the nathanial. The cain halloo the irving. The cain misalign the nathanial. If someone misalign the nathanial then they see the nathanial. If someone halloo the nathanial and they are putrescent then the nathanial is trustful. If someone misalign the nathanial and the nathanial halloo the cain then the cain skateboard the irving. If someone halloo the cain then the cain is thorny. If the nathanial skateboard the cain then the cain halloo the irving. If someone is putrescent then they see the cain. If the irving skateboard the cain then the irving skateboard the nathanial. If someone is trustful then they eat the cain. The irving misalign the nathanial.", "logic": "\nThorny(nathanial)\nMisalign(nathanial, cain)\nSkateboard(nathanial, irving)\nSkateboard(nathanial, cain)\nHalloo(irving, nathanial)\nTrustful(irving)\nCoetaneous(irving)\nPutrescent(irving)\nUnbarred(irving)\nMisalign(irving, nathanial)\nMisalign(irving, cain)\nSkateboard(irving, nathanial)\nSkateboard(irving, cain)\nHalloo(cain, nathanial)\nHalloo(cain, irving)\nMisalign(cain, nathanial)\nforall x (Misalign(x, nathanial) -> Skateboard(x, nathanial))\nforall x (Halloo(x, nathanial) and Putrescent(x) -> Trustful(nathanial))\nforall x (Misalign(x, nathanial) and Halloo(nathanial, cain) -> Skateboard(cain, irving))\nforall x (Halloo(x, cain) -> Thorny(cain))\nSkateboard(nathanial, cain) -> Halloo(cain, irving)\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Skateboard(x, cain))\nSkateboard(irving, cain) -> Skateboard(irving, nathanial)\nforall x (Trustful(x) -> Halloo(x, cain))\n\nMisalign(irving, nathanial)\n\ntherefore Misalign(irving, nathanial)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The elric is imported. The elric begrudge the beryl. The elric service the ximenez. The elric service the beryl. The ximenez signal the elric. The ximenez is diatomic. The ximenez is covariant. The ximenez is owing. The ximenez is unlamented. The ximenez begrudge the elric. The ximenez begrudge the beryl. The ximenez service the elric. The ximenez service the beryl. The beryl signal the elric. The beryl signal the ximenez. The beryl begrudge the elric. If someone begrudge the elric then they see the elric. If someone signal the elric and they are owing then the elric is diatomic. If someone begrudge the elric and the elric signal the beryl then the beryl service the ximenez. If someone signal the beryl then the beryl is imported. If the elric service the beryl then the beryl signal the ximenez. If someone is owing then they see the beryl. If the ximenez service the beryl then the ximenez service the elric. If someone is diatomic then they eat the beryl. The beryl does not eat the ximenez.", "logic": "\nImported(elric)\nBegrudge(elric, beryl)\nService(elric, ximenez)\nService(elric, beryl)\nSignal(ximenez, elric)\nDiatomic(ximenez)\nCovariant(ximenez)\nOwing(ximenez)\nUnlamented(ximenez)\nBegrudge(ximenez, elric)\nBegrudge(ximenez, beryl)\nService(ximenez, elric)\nService(ximenez, beryl)\nSignal(beryl, elric)\nSignal(beryl, ximenez)\nBegrudge(beryl, elric)\nforall x (Begrudge(x, elric) -> Service(x, elric))\nforall x (Signal(x, elric) and Owing(x) -> Diatomic(elric))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, elric) and Signal(elric, beryl) -> Service(beryl, ximenez))\nforall x (Signal(x, beryl) -> Imported(beryl))\nService(elric, beryl) -> Signal(beryl, ximenez)\nforall x (Owing(x) -> Service(x, beryl))\nService(ximenez, beryl) -> Service(ximenez, elric)\nforall x (Diatomic(x) -> Signal(x, beryl))\n\nnot Signal(beryl, ximenez)\n\ntherefore Signal(beryl, ximenez)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The jannel is tidal. The jannel steamer the marieann. The jannel mineralize the aurie. The jannel mineralize the marieann. The aurie belong the jannel. The aurie is armored. The aurie is aecial. The aurie is unceasing. The aurie is branchless. The aurie steamer the jannel. The aurie steamer the marieann. The aurie mineralize the jannel. The aurie mineralize the marieann. The marieann belong the jannel. The marieann belong the aurie. The marieann steamer the jannel. If someone steamer the jannel then they see the jannel. If someone belong the jannel and they are unceasing then the jannel is armored. If someone steamer the jannel and the jannel belong the marieann then the marieann mineralize the aurie. If someone belong the marieann then the marieann is tidal. If the jannel mineralize the marieann then the marieann belong the aurie. If someone is unceasing then they see the marieann. If the aurie mineralize the marieann then the aurie mineralize the jannel. If someone is armored then they eat the marieann. The marieann mineralize the jannel.", "logic": "\nTidal(jannel)\nSteamer(jannel, marieann)\nMineralize(jannel, aurie)\nMineralize(jannel, marieann)\nBelong(aurie, jannel)\nArmored(aurie)\nAecial(aurie)\nUnceasing(aurie)\nBranchless(aurie)\nSteamer(aurie, jannel)\nSteamer(aurie, marieann)\nMineralize(aurie, jannel)\nMineralize(aurie, marieann)\nBelong(marieann, jannel)\nBelong(marieann, aurie)\nSteamer(marieann, jannel)\nforall x (Steamer(x, jannel) -> Mineralize(x, jannel))\nforall x (Belong(x, jannel) and Unceasing(x) -> Armored(jannel))\nforall x (Steamer(x, jannel) and Belong(jannel, marieann) -> Mineralize(marieann, aurie))\nforall x (Belong(x, marieann) -> Tidal(marieann))\nMineralize(jannel, marieann) -> Belong(marieann, aurie)\nforall x (Unceasing(x) -> Mineralize(x, marieann))\nMineralize(aurie, marieann) -> Mineralize(aurie, jannel)\nforall x (Armored(x) -> Belong(x, marieann))\n\nMineralize(marieann, jannel)\n\nSteamer(marieann, jannel) and forall x (Steamer(x, jannel) -> Mineralize(x, jannel)) -> therefore Mineralize(marieann, jannel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The ophelia is aftermost. The ophelia remember the marline. The ophelia sugar the merissa. The ophelia sugar the marline. The merissa wham the ophelia. The merissa is ultra. The merissa is supporting. The merissa is bistroic. The merissa is jellylike. The merissa remember the ophelia. The merissa remember the marline. The merissa sugar the ophelia. The merissa sugar the marline. The marline wham the ophelia. The marline wham the merissa. The marline remember the ophelia. If someone remember the ophelia then they see the ophelia. If someone wham the ophelia and they are bistroic then the ophelia is ultra. If someone remember the ophelia and the ophelia wham the marline then the marline sugar the merissa. If someone wham the marline then the marline is aftermost. If the ophelia sugar the marline then the marline wham the merissa. If someone is bistroic then they see the marline. If the merissa sugar the marline then the merissa sugar the ophelia. If someone is ultra then they eat the marline. The marline does not see the ophelia.", "logic": "\nAftermost(ophelia)\nRemember(ophelia, marline)\nSugar(ophelia, merissa)\nSugar(ophelia, marline)\nWham(merissa, ophelia)\nUltra(merissa)\nSupporting(merissa)\nBistroic(merissa)\nJellylike(merissa)\nRemember(merissa, ophelia)\nRemember(merissa, marline)\nSugar(merissa, ophelia)\nSugar(merissa, marline)\nWham(marline, ophelia)\nWham(marline, merissa)\nRemember(marline, ophelia)\nforall x (Remember(x, ophelia) -> Sugar(x, ophelia))\nforall x (Wham(x, ophelia) and Bistroic(x) -> Ultra(ophelia))\nforall x (Remember(x, ophelia) and Wham(ophelia, marline) -> Sugar(marline, merissa))\nforall x (Wham(x, marline) -> Aftermost(marline))\nSugar(ophelia, marline) -> Wham(marline, merissa)\nforall x (Bistroic(x) -> Sugar(x, marline))\nSugar(merissa, marline) -> Sugar(merissa, ophelia)\nforall x (Ultra(x) -> Wham(x, marline))\n\nnot Sugar(marline, ophelia)\n\nRemember(marline, ophelia) and forall x (Remember(x, ophelia) -> Sugar(x, ophelia)) -> therefore Sugar(marline, ophelia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The rutledge is accessible. The rutledge clabber the collette. The rutledge modernise the seth. The rutledge modernise the collette. The seth construe the rutledge. The seth is demode. The seth is assurgent. The seth is byzantine. The seth is astragalar. The seth clabber the rutledge. The seth clabber the collette. The seth modernise the rutledge. The seth modernise the collette. The collette construe the rutledge. The collette construe the seth. The collette clabber the rutledge. If someone clabber the rutledge then they see the rutledge. If someone construe the rutledge and they are byzantine then the rutledge is demode. If someone clabber the rutledge and the rutledge construe the collette then the collette modernise the seth. If someone construe the collette then the collette is accessible. If the rutledge modernise the collette then the collette construe the seth. If someone is byzantine then they see the collette. If the seth modernise the collette then the seth modernise the rutledge. If someone is demode then they eat the collette. The collette is accessible.", "logic": "\nAccessible(rutledge)\nClabber(rutledge, collette)\nModernise(rutledge, seth)\nModernise(rutledge, collette)\nConstrue(seth, rutledge)\nDemode(seth)\nAssurgent(seth)\nByzantine(seth)\nAstragalar(seth)\nClabber(seth, rutledge)\nClabber(seth, collette)\nModernise(seth, rutledge)\nModernise(seth, collette)\nConstrue(collette, rutledge)\nConstrue(collette, seth)\nClabber(collette, rutledge)\nforall x (Clabber(x, rutledge) -> Modernise(x, rutledge))\nforall x (Construe(x, rutledge) and Byzantine(x) -> Demode(rutledge))\nforall x (Clabber(x, rutledge) and Construe(rutledge, collette) -> Modernise(collette, seth))\nforall x (Construe(x, collette) -> Accessible(collette))\nModernise(rutledge, collette) -> Construe(collette, seth)\nforall x (Byzantine(x) -> Modernise(x, collette))\nModernise(seth, collette) -> Modernise(seth, rutledge)\nforall x (Demode(x) -> Construe(x, collette))\n\nAccessible(collette)\n\nDemode(seth) and forall x (Demode(x) -> Construe(x, collette)) -> therefore Construe(seth, collette) Construe(seth, collette) and forall x (Construe(x, collette) -> Accessible(collette)) -> therefore Accessible(collette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The joab is metrical. The joab scollop the cornela. The joab hoot the merwin. The joab hoot the cornela. The merwin motorize the joab. The merwin is disklike. The merwin is edematous. The merwin is entangled. The merwin is papistical. The merwin scollop the joab. The merwin scollop the cornela. The merwin hoot the joab. The merwin hoot the cornela. The cornela motorize the joab. The cornela motorize the merwin. The cornela scollop the joab. If someone scollop the joab then they see the joab. If someone motorize the joab and they are entangled then the joab is disklike. If someone scollop the joab and the joab motorize the cornela then the cornela hoot the merwin. If someone motorize the cornela then the cornela is metrical. If the joab hoot the cornela then the cornela motorize the merwin. If someone is entangled then they see the cornela. If the merwin hoot the cornela then the merwin hoot the joab. If someone is disklike then they eat the cornela. The joab does not eat the cornela.", "logic": "\nMetrical(joab)\nScollop(joab, cornela)\nHoot(joab, merwin)\nHoot(joab, cornela)\nMotorize(merwin, joab)\nDisklike(merwin)\nEdematous(merwin)\nEntangled(merwin)\nPapistical(merwin)\nScollop(merwin, joab)\nScollop(merwin, cornela)\nHoot(merwin, joab)\nHoot(merwin, cornela)\nMotorize(cornela, joab)\nMotorize(cornela, merwin)\nScollop(cornela, joab)\nforall x (Scollop(x, joab) -> Hoot(x, joab))\nforall x (Motorize(x, joab) and Entangled(x) -> Disklike(joab))\nforall x (Scollop(x, joab) and Motorize(joab, cornela) -> Hoot(cornela, merwin))\nforall x (Motorize(x, cornela) -> Metrical(cornela))\nHoot(joab, cornela) -> Motorize(cornela, merwin)\nforall x (Entangled(x) -> Hoot(x, cornela))\nHoot(merwin, cornela) -> Hoot(merwin, joab)\nforall x (Disklike(x) -> Motorize(x, cornela))\n\nnot Motorize(joab, cornela)\n\nMotorize(merwin, joab) and Entangled(merwin) and forall x (Motorize(x, joab) and Entangled(x) -> Disklike(joab)) -> therefore Disklike(joab) Disklike(joab) and forall x (Disklike(x) -> Motorize(x, cornela)) -> therefore Motorize(joab, cornela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The gabriel is anagogic. The gabriel sign the xena. The gabriel behave the simonette. The gabriel behave the xena. The simonette wive the gabriel. The simonette is euphonic. The simonette is slick. The simonette is beechen. The simonette is gaussian. The simonette sign the gabriel. The simonette sign the xena. The simonette behave the gabriel. The simonette behave the xena. The xena wive the gabriel. The xena wive the simonette. The xena sign the gabriel. If someone sign the gabriel then they see the gabriel. If someone wive the gabriel and they are beechen then the gabriel is euphonic. If someone sign the gabriel and the gabriel wive the xena then the xena behave the simonette. If someone wive the xena then the xena is anagogic. If the gabriel behave the xena then the xena wive the simonette. If someone is beechen then they see the xena. If the simonette behave the xena then the simonette behave the gabriel. If someone is euphonic then they eat the xena. The xena behave the simonette.", "logic": "\nAnagogic(gabriel)\nSign(gabriel, xena)\nBehave(gabriel, simonette)\nBehave(gabriel, xena)\nWive(simonette, gabriel)\nEuphonic(simonette)\nSlick(simonette)\nBeechen(simonette)\nGaussian(simonette)\nSign(simonette, gabriel)\nSign(simonette, xena)\nBehave(simonette, gabriel)\nBehave(simonette, xena)\nWive(xena, gabriel)\nWive(xena, simonette)\nSign(xena, gabriel)\nforall x (Sign(x, gabriel) -> Behave(x, gabriel))\nforall x (Wive(x, gabriel) and Beechen(x) -> Euphonic(gabriel))\nforall x (Sign(x, gabriel) and Wive(gabriel, xena) -> Behave(xena, simonette))\nforall x (Wive(x, xena) -> Anagogic(xena))\nBehave(gabriel, xena) -> Wive(xena, simonette)\nforall x (Beechen(x) -> Behave(x, xena))\nBehave(simonette, xena) -> Behave(simonette, gabriel)\nforall x (Euphonic(x) -> Wive(x, xena))\n\nBehave(xena, simonette)\n\nWive(simonette, gabriel) and Beechen(simonette) and forall x (Wive(x, gabriel) and Beechen(x) -> Euphonic(gabriel)) -> therefore Euphonic(gabriel) Euphonic(gabriel) and forall x (Euphonic(x) -> Wive(x, xena)) -> therefore Wive(gabriel, xena) Sign(simonette, gabriel) and Wive(gabriel, xena) and forall x (Sign(x, gabriel) and Wive(gabriel, xena) -> Behave(xena, simonette)) -> therefore Behave(xena, simonette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The gray is subsurface. The gray solmizate the willdon. The gray plait the claribel. The gray plait the willdon. The claribel climb the gray. The claribel is navicular. The claribel is pyrectic. The claribel is allegiant. The claribel is apart. The claribel solmizate the gray. The claribel solmizate the willdon. The claribel plait the gray. The claribel plait the willdon. The willdon climb the gray. The willdon climb the claribel. The willdon solmizate the gray. If someone solmizate the gray then they see the gray. If someone climb the gray and they are allegiant then the gray is navicular. If someone solmizate the gray and the gray climb the willdon then the willdon plait the claribel. If someone climb the willdon then the willdon is subsurface. If the gray plait the willdon then the willdon climb the claribel. If someone is allegiant then they see the willdon. If the claribel plait the willdon then the claribel plait the gray. If someone is navicular then they eat the willdon. The willdon does not see the claribel.", "logic": "\nSubsurface(gray)\nSolmizate(gray, willdon)\nPlait(gray, claribel)\nPlait(gray, willdon)\nClimb(claribel, gray)\nNavicular(claribel)\nPyrectic(claribel)\nAllegiant(claribel)\nApart(claribel)\nSolmizate(claribel, gray)\nSolmizate(claribel, willdon)\nPlait(claribel, gray)\nPlait(claribel, willdon)\nClimb(willdon, gray)\nClimb(willdon, claribel)\nSolmizate(willdon, gray)\nforall x (Solmizate(x, gray) -> Plait(x, gray))\nforall x (Climb(x, gray) and Allegiant(x) -> Navicular(gray))\nforall x (Solmizate(x, gray) and Climb(gray, willdon) -> Plait(willdon, claribel))\nforall x (Climb(x, willdon) -> Subsurface(willdon))\nPlait(gray, willdon) -> Climb(willdon, claribel)\nforall x (Allegiant(x) -> Plait(x, willdon))\nPlait(claribel, willdon) -> Plait(claribel, gray)\nforall x (Navicular(x) -> Climb(x, willdon))\n\nnot Plait(willdon, claribel)\n\nClimb(claribel, gray) and Allegiant(claribel) and forall x (Climb(x, gray) and Allegiant(x) -> Navicular(gray)) -> therefore Navicular(gray) Navicular(gray) and forall x (Navicular(x) -> Climb(x, willdon)) -> therefore Climb(gray, willdon) Solmizate(claribel, gray) and Climb(gray, willdon) and forall x (Solmizate(x, gray) and Climb(gray, willdon) -> Plait(willdon, claribel)) -> therefore Plait(willdon, claribel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The frankie is medicinal. The frankie horseshoe the thibaut. The frankie subsist the tarrant. The frankie subsist the thibaut. The tarrant whisper the frankie. The tarrant is autolytic. The tarrant is premiere. The tarrant is portrayed. The tarrant is mean. The tarrant horseshoe the frankie. The tarrant horseshoe the thibaut. The tarrant subsist the frankie. The tarrant subsist the thibaut. The thibaut whisper the frankie. The thibaut whisper the tarrant. The thibaut horseshoe the frankie. If someone horseshoe the frankie then they see the frankie. If someone whisper the frankie and they are portrayed then the frankie is autolytic. If someone horseshoe the frankie and the frankie whisper the thibaut then the thibaut subsist the tarrant. If someone whisper the thibaut then the thibaut is medicinal. If the frankie subsist the thibaut then the thibaut whisper the tarrant. If someone is portrayed then they see the thibaut. If the tarrant subsist the thibaut then the tarrant subsist the frankie. If someone is autolytic then they eat the thibaut. The thibaut does not see the thibaut.", "logic": "\nMedicinal(frankie)\nHorseshoe(frankie, thibaut)\nSubsist(frankie, tarrant)\nSubsist(frankie, thibaut)\nWhisper(tarrant, frankie)\nAutolytic(tarrant)\nPremiere(tarrant)\nPortrayed(tarrant)\nMean(tarrant)\nHorseshoe(tarrant, frankie)\nHorseshoe(tarrant, thibaut)\nSubsist(tarrant, frankie)\nSubsist(tarrant, thibaut)\nWhisper(thibaut, frankie)\nWhisper(thibaut, tarrant)\nHorseshoe(thibaut, frankie)\nforall x (Horseshoe(x, frankie) -> Subsist(x, frankie))\nforall x (Whisper(x, frankie) and Portrayed(x) -> Autolytic(frankie))\nforall x (Horseshoe(x, frankie) and Whisper(frankie, thibaut) -> Subsist(thibaut, tarrant))\nforall x (Whisper(x, thibaut) -> Medicinal(thibaut))\nSubsist(frankie, thibaut) -> Whisper(thibaut, tarrant)\nforall x (Portrayed(x) -> Subsist(x, thibaut))\nSubsist(tarrant, thibaut) -> Subsist(tarrant, frankie)\nforall x (Autolytic(x) -> Whisper(x, thibaut))\n\nnot Subsist(thibaut, thibaut)\n\nforall x (Portrayed(x) -> Subsist(x, thibaut)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The maurise is lewd. The maurise muck the jessy. The maurise soften the cathi. The maurise soften the jessy. The cathi mentor the maurise. The cathi is vietnamese. The cathi is intuitive. The cathi is crisp. The cathi is canary. The cathi muck the maurise. The cathi muck the jessy. The cathi soften the maurise. The cathi soften the jessy. The jessy mentor the maurise. The jessy mentor the cathi. The jessy muck the maurise. If someone muck the maurise then they see the maurise. If someone mentor the maurise and they are crisp then the maurise is vietnamese. If someone muck the maurise and the maurise mentor the jessy then the jessy soften the cathi. If someone mentor the jessy then the jessy is lewd. If the maurise soften the jessy then the jessy mentor the cathi. If someone is crisp then they see the jessy. If the cathi soften the jessy then the cathi soften the maurise. If someone is vietnamese then they eat the jessy. The maurise soften the maurise.", "logic": "\nLewd(maurise)\nMuck(maurise, jessy)\nSoften(maurise, cathi)\nSoften(maurise, jessy)\nMentor(cathi, maurise)\nVietnamese(cathi)\nIntuitive(cathi)\nCrisp(cathi)\nCanary(cathi)\nMuck(cathi, maurise)\nMuck(cathi, jessy)\nSoften(cathi, maurise)\nSoften(cathi, jessy)\nMentor(jessy, maurise)\nMentor(jessy, cathi)\nMuck(jessy, maurise)\nforall x (Muck(x, maurise) -> Soften(x, maurise))\nforall x (Mentor(x, maurise) and Crisp(x) -> Vietnamese(maurise))\nforall x (Muck(x, maurise) and Mentor(maurise, jessy) -> Soften(jessy, cathi))\nforall x (Mentor(x, jessy) -> Lewd(jessy))\nSoften(maurise, jessy) -> Mentor(jessy, cathi)\nforall x (Crisp(x) -> Soften(x, jessy))\nSoften(cathi, jessy) -> Soften(cathi, maurise)\nforall x (Vietnamese(x) -> Mentor(x, jessy))\n\nSoften(maurise, maurise)\n\nforall x (Muck(x, maurise) -> Soften(x, maurise)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The kerry is flustered. The kerry unwire the rocky. The kerry interlude the rosana. The kerry interlude the rocky. The rosana rebate the kerry. The rosana is xenogeneic. The rosana is instinct. The rosana is totaled. The rosana is exciting. The rosana unwire the kerry. The rosana unwire the rocky. The rosana interlude the kerry. The rosana interlude the rocky. The rocky rebate the kerry. The rocky rebate the rosana. The rocky unwire the kerry. If someone unwire the kerry then they see the kerry. If someone rebate the kerry and they are totaled then the kerry is xenogeneic. If someone unwire the kerry and the kerry rebate the rocky then the rocky interlude the rosana. If someone rebate the rocky then the rocky is flustered. If the kerry interlude the rocky then the rocky rebate the rosana. If someone is totaled then they see the rocky. If the rosana interlude the rocky then the rosana interlude the kerry. If someone is xenogeneic then they eat the rocky. The rocky does not eat the rocky.", "logic": "\nFlustered(kerry)\nUnwire(kerry, rocky)\nInterlude(kerry, rosana)\nInterlude(kerry, rocky)\nRebate(rosana, kerry)\nXenogeneic(rosana)\nInstinct(rosana)\nTotaled(rosana)\nExciting(rosana)\nUnwire(rosana, kerry)\nUnwire(rosana, rocky)\nInterlude(rosana, kerry)\nInterlude(rosana, rocky)\nRebate(rocky, kerry)\nRebate(rocky, rosana)\nUnwire(rocky, kerry)\nforall x (Unwire(x, kerry) -> Interlude(x, kerry))\nforall x (Rebate(x, kerry) and Totaled(x) -> Xenogeneic(kerry))\nforall x (Unwire(x, kerry) and Rebate(kerry, rocky) -> Interlude(rocky, rosana))\nforall x (Rebate(x, rocky) -> Flustered(rocky))\nInterlude(kerry, rocky) -> Rebate(rocky, rosana)\nforall x (Totaled(x) -> Interlude(x, rocky))\nInterlude(rosana, rocky) -> Interlude(rosana, kerry)\nforall x (Xenogeneic(x) -> Rebate(x, rocky))\n\nnot Rebate(rocky, rocky)\n\nforall x (Xenogeneic(x) -> Rebate(x, rocky)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The hannis is wintry. The hannis swivel the tate. The hannis windsurf the engracia. The hannis windsurf the tate. The engracia authorise the hannis. The engracia is belemnitic. The engracia is canonist. The engracia is languid. The engracia is sanguinary. The engracia swivel the hannis. The engracia swivel the tate. The engracia windsurf the hannis. The engracia windsurf the tate. The tate authorise the hannis. The tate authorise the engracia. The tate swivel the hannis. If someone swivel the hannis then they see the hannis. If someone authorise the hannis and they are languid then the hannis is belemnitic. If someone swivel the hannis and the hannis authorise the tate then the tate windsurf the engracia. If someone authorise the tate then the tate is wintry. If the hannis windsurf the tate then the tate authorise the engracia. If someone is languid then they see the tate. If the engracia windsurf the tate then the engracia windsurf the hannis. If someone is belemnitic then they eat the tate. The hannis authorise the hannis.", "logic": "\nWintry(hannis)\nSwivel(hannis, tate)\nWindsurf(hannis, engracia)\nWindsurf(hannis, tate)\nAuthorise(engracia, hannis)\nBelemnitic(engracia)\nCanonist(engracia)\nLanguid(engracia)\nSanguinary(engracia)\nSwivel(engracia, hannis)\nSwivel(engracia, tate)\nWindsurf(engracia, hannis)\nWindsurf(engracia, tate)\nAuthorise(tate, hannis)\nAuthorise(tate, engracia)\nSwivel(tate, hannis)\nforall x (Swivel(x, hannis) -> Windsurf(x, hannis))\nforall x (Authorise(x, hannis) and Languid(x) -> Belemnitic(hannis))\nforall x (Swivel(x, hannis) and Authorise(hannis, tate) -> Windsurf(tate, engracia))\nforall x (Authorise(x, tate) -> Wintry(tate))\nWindsurf(hannis, tate) -> Authorise(tate, engracia)\nforall x (Languid(x) -> Windsurf(x, tate))\nWindsurf(engracia, tate) -> Windsurf(engracia, hannis)\nforall x (Belemnitic(x) -> Authorise(x, tate))\n\nAuthorise(hannis, hannis)\n\nAuthorise(hannis, hannis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The timmie is ratlike. The timmie earn the deina. The timmie stridulate the kaitlynn. The timmie stridulate the deina. The kaitlynn overdress the timmie. The kaitlynn is whiplike. The kaitlynn is seventh. The kaitlynn is copulative. The kaitlynn is loath. The kaitlynn earn the timmie. The kaitlynn earn the deina. The kaitlynn stridulate the timmie. The kaitlynn stridulate the deina. The deina overdress the timmie. The deina overdress the kaitlynn. The deina earn the timmie. If someone earn the timmie then they see the timmie. If someone overdress the timmie and they are copulative then the timmie is whiplike. If someone earn the timmie and the timmie overdress the deina then the deina stridulate the kaitlynn. If someone overdress the deina then the deina is ratlike. If the timmie stridulate the deina then the deina overdress the kaitlynn. If someone is copulative then they see the deina. If the kaitlynn stridulate the deina then the kaitlynn stridulate the timmie. If someone is whiplike then they eat the deina. The timmie does not like the kaitlynn.", "logic": "\nRatlike(timmie)\nEarn(timmie, deina)\nStridulate(timmie, kaitlynn)\nStridulate(timmie, deina)\nOverdress(kaitlynn, timmie)\nWhiplike(kaitlynn)\nSeventh(kaitlynn)\nCopulative(kaitlynn)\nLoath(kaitlynn)\nEarn(kaitlynn, timmie)\nEarn(kaitlynn, deina)\nStridulate(kaitlynn, timmie)\nStridulate(kaitlynn, deina)\nOverdress(deina, timmie)\nOverdress(deina, kaitlynn)\nEarn(deina, timmie)\nforall x (Earn(x, timmie) -> Stridulate(x, timmie))\nforall x (Overdress(x, timmie) and Copulative(x) -> Whiplike(timmie))\nforall x (Earn(x, timmie) and Overdress(timmie, deina) -> Stridulate(deina, kaitlynn))\nforall x (Overdress(x, deina) -> Ratlike(deina))\nStridulate(timmie, deina) -> Overdress(deina, kaitlynn)\nforall x (Copulative(x) -> Stridulate(x, deina))\nStridulate(kaitlynn, deina) -> Stridulate(kaitlynn, timmie)\nforall x (Whiplike(x) -> Overdress(x, deina))\n\nnot Earn(timmie, kaitlynn)\n\nnot Earn(timmie, kaitlynn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The eadie is patchy. The eadie hover the erminia. The eadie overrate the marni. The eadie overrate the erminia. The marni legislate the eadie. The marni is valorous. The marni is ursine. The marni is vitreous. The marni is aplitic. The marni hover the eadie. The marni hover the erminia. The marni overrate the eadie. The marni overrate the erminia. The erminia legislate the eadie. The erminia legislate the marni. The erminia hover the eadie. If someone hover the eadie then they see the eadie. If someone legislate the eadie and they are vitreous then the eadie is valorous. If someone hover the eadie and the eadie legislate the erminia then the erminia overrate the marni. If someone legislate the erminia then the erminia is patchy. If the eadie overrate the erminia then the erminia legislate the marni. If someone is vitreous then they see the erminia. If the marni overrate the erminia then the marni overrate the eadie. If someone is valorous then they eat the erminia. The erminia is valorous.", "logic": "\nPatchy(eadie)\nHover(eadie, erminia)\nOverrate(eadie, marni)\nOverrate(eadie, erminia)\nLegislate(marni, eadie)\nValorous(marni)\nUrsine(marni)\nVitreous(marni)\nAplitic(marni)\nHover(marni, eadie)\nHover(marni, erminia)\nOverrate(marni, eadie)\nOverrate(marni, erminia)\nLegislate(erminia, eadie)\nLegislate(erminia, marni)\nHover(erminia, eadie)\nforall x (Hover(x, eadie) -> Overrate(x, eadie))\nforall x (Legislate(x, eadie) and Vitreous(x) -> Valorous(eadie))\nforall x (Hover(x, eadie) and Legislate(eadie, erminia) -> Overrate(erminia, marni))\nforall x (Legislate(x, erminia) -> Patchy(erminia))\nOverrate(eadie, erminia) -> Legislate(erminia, marni)\nforall x (Vitreous(x) -> Overrate(x, erminia))\nOverrate(marni, erminia) -> Overrate(marni, eadie)\nforall x (Valorous(x) -> Legislate(x, erminia))\n\nValorous(erminia)\n\nValorous(erminia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The anallise is unsealed. The anallise research the hatti. The anallise pillow the tallia. The anallise pillow the hatti. The tallia roughhouse the anallise. The tallia is dopy. The tallia is twiggy. The tallia is adaptive. The tallia is malignant. The tallia research the anallise. The tallia research the hatti. The tallia pillow the anallise. The tallia pillow the hatti. The hatti roughhouse the anallise. The hatti roughhouse the tallia. The hatti research the anallise. If someone research the anallise then they see the anallise. If someone roughhouse the anallise and they are adaptive then the anallise is dopy. If someone research the anallise and the anallise roughhouse the hatti then the hatti pillow the tallia. If someone roughhouse the hatti then the hatti is unsealed. If the anallise pillow the hatti then the hatti roughhouse the tallia. If someone is adaptive then they see the hatti. If the tallia pillow the hatti then the tallia pillow the anallise. If someone is dopy then they eat the hatti. The anallise does not like the anallise.", "logic": "\nUnsealed(anallise)\nResearch(anallise, hatti)\nPillow(anallise, tallia)\nPillow(anallise, hatti)\nRoughhouse(tallia, anallise)\nDopy(tallia)\nTwiggy(tallia)\nAdaptive(tallia)\nMalignant(tallia)\nResearch(tallia, anallise)\nResearch(tallia, hatti)\nPillow(tallia, anallise)\nPillow(tallia, hatti)\nRoughhouse(hatti, anallise)\nRoughhouse(hatti, tallia)\nResearch(hatti, anallise)\nforall x (Research(x, anallise) -> Pillow(x, anallise))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, anallise) and Adaptive(x) -> Dopy(anallise))\nforall x (Research(x, anallise) and Roughhouse(anallise, hatti) -> Pillow(hatti, tallia))\nforall x (Roughhouse(x, hatti) -> Unsealed(hatti))\nPillow(anallise, hatti) -> Roughhouse(hatti, tallia)\nforall x (Adaptive(x) -> Pillow(x, hatti))\nPillow(tallia, hatti) -> Pillow(tallia, anallise)\nforall x (Dopy(x) -> Roughhouse(x, hatti))\n\nnot Research(anallise, anallise)\n\nnot Research(anallise, anallise) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The maggy is surrogate. The maggy waver the aron. The maggy desex the ricky. The maggy desex the aron. The ricky chain the maggy. The ricky is pursuing. The ricky is same. The ricky is assumed. The ricky is advanced. The ricky waver the maggy. The ricky waver the aron. The ricky desex the maggy. The ricky desex the aron. The aron chain the maggy. The aron chain the ricky. The aron waver the maggy. If someone waver the maggy then they see the maggy. If someone chain the maggy and they are assumed then the maggy is pursuing. If someone waver the maggy and the maggy chain the aron then the aron desex the ricky. If someone chain the aron then the aron is surrogate. If the maggy desex the aron then the aron chain the ricky. If someone is assumed then they see the aron. If the ricky desex the aron then the ricky desex the maggy. If someone is pursuing then they eat the aron. The maggy chain the ricky.", "logic": "\nSurrogate(maggy)\nWaver(maggy, aron)\nDesex(maggy, ricky)\nDesex(maggy, aron)\nChain(ricky, maggy)\nPursuing(ricky)\nSame(ricky)\nAssumed(ricky)\nAdvanced(ricky)\nWaver(ricky, maggy)\nWaver(ricky, aron)\nDesex(ricky, maggy)\nDesex(ricky, aron)\nChain(aron, maggy)\nChain(aron, ricky)\nWaver(aron, maggy)\nforall x (Waver(x, maggy) -> Desex(x, maggy))\nforall x (Chain(x, maggy) and Assumed(x) -> Pursuing(maggy))\nforall x (Waver(x, maggy) and Chain(maggy, aron) -> Desex(aron, ricky))\nforall x (Chain(x, aron) -> Surrogate(aron))\nDesex(maggy, aron) -> Chain(aron, ricky)\nforall x (Assumed(x) -> Desex(x, aron))\nDesex(ricky, aron) -> Desex(ricky, maggy)\nforall x (Pursuing(x) -> Chain(x, aron))\n\nChain(maggy, ricky)\n\nChain(maggy, ricky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-512"} {"premises": "The bernd critique the sheba. The bernd does not eat the alysia. The bernd invert the sheba. The bernd invert the alysia. The bernd does not visit the sheba. The bernd grouch the alysia. The sheba is trifling. The sheba does not see the bernd. The sheba grouch the bernd. The alysia is not amyloid. The alysia is trifling. The alysia is licenced. The alysia invert the bernd. The alysia grouch the bernd. The alysia grouch the sheba. If something grouch the alysia and it invert the bernd then the bernd is amyloid. If the bernd grouch the alysia and the alysia invert the bernd then the alysia critique the sheba. If something critique the sheba and it is licenced then it grouch the alysia. If something grouch the alysia and it invert the alysia then the alysia grouch the sheba. If something critique the alysia then the alysia invert the bernd. If the sheba is arrhythmic and the sheba does not visit the alysia then the alysia is trifling. The sheba does not see the bernd.", "logic": "\nCritique(bernd, sheba)\nnot Critique(bernd, alysia)\nInvert(bernd, sheba)\nInvert(bernd, alysia)\nnot Grouch(bernd, sheba)\nGrouch(bernd, alysia)\nTrifling(sheba)\nnot Invert(sheba, bernd)\nGrouch(sheba, bernd)\nnot Amyloid(alysia)\nTrifling(alysia)\nLicenced(alysia)\nInvert(alysia, bernd)\nGrouch(alysia, bernd)\nGrouch(alysia, sheba)\nforall x (Grouch(x, alysia) and Invert(x, bernd) -> Amyloid(bernd))\nGrouch(bernd, alysia) and Invert(alysia, bernd) -> Critique(alysia, sheba)\nforall x (Critique(x, sheba) and Licenced(x) -> Grouch(x, alysia))\nforall x (Grouch(x, alysia) and Invert(x, alysia) -> Grouch(alysia, sheba))\nforall x (Critique(x, alysia) -> Invert(alysia, bernd))\nArrhythmic(sheba) and not Grouch(sheba, alysia) -> Trifling(alysia)\n\nnot Invert(sheba, bernd)\n\ntherefore not Invert(sheba, bernd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The lorena corbel the trista. The lorena does not eat the anatoly. The lorena dimple the trista. The lorena dimple the anatoly. The lorena does not visit the trista. The lorena symbolize the anatoly. The trista is priestlike. The trista does not see the lorena. The trista symbolize the lorena. The anatoly is not refreshing. The anatoly is priestlike. The anatoly is asyndetic. The anatoly dimple the lorena. The anatoly symbolize the lorena. The anatoly symbolize the trista. If something symbolize the anatoly and it dimple the lorena then the lorena is refreshing. If the lorena symbolize the anatoly and the anatoly dimple the lorena then the anatoly corbel the trista. If something corbel the trista and it is asyndetic then it symbolize the anatoly. If something symbolize the anatoly and it dimple the anatoly then the anatoly symbolize the trista. If something corbel the anatoly then the anatoly dimple the lorena. If the trista is faced and the trista does not visit the anatoly then the anatoly is priestlike. The lorena does not eat the trista.", "logic": "\nCorbel(lorena, trista)\nnot Corbel(lorena, anatoly)\nDimple(lorena, trista)\nDimple(lorena, anatoly)\nnot Symbolize(lorena, trista)\nSymbolize(lorena, anatoly)\nPriestlike(trista)\nnot Dimple(trista, lorena)\nSymbolize(trista, lorena)\nnot Refreshing(anatoly)\nPriestlike(anatoly)\nAsyndetic(anatoly)\nDimple(anatoly, lorena)\nSymbolize(anatoly, lorena)\nSymbolize(anatoly, trista)\nforall x (Symbolize(x, anatoly) and Dimple(x, lorena) -> Refreshing(lorena))\nSymbolize(lorena, anatoly) and Dimple(anatoly, lorena) -> Corbel(anatoly, trista)\nforall x (Corbel(x, trista) and Asyndetic(x) -> Symbolize(x, anatoly))\nforall x (Symbolize(x, anatoly) and Dimple(x, anatoly) -> Symbolize(anatoly, trista))\nforall x (Corbel(x, anatoly) -> Dimple(anatoly, lorena))\nFaced(trista) and not Symbolize(trista, anatoly) -> Priestlike(anatoly)\n\nnot Corbel(lorena, trista)\n\ntherefore Corbel(lorena, trista)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The reg hector the neale. The reg does not eat the gabriello. The reg affiance the neale. The reg affiance the gabriello. The reg does not visit the neale. The reg oxidize the gabriello. The neale is addable. The neale does not see the reg. The neale oxidize the reg. The gabriello is not politic. The gabriello is addable. The gabriello is falciform. The gabriello affiance the reg. The gabriello oxidize the reg. The gabriello oxidize the neale. If something oxidize the gabriello and it affiance the reg then the reg is politic. If the reg oxidize the gabriello and the gabriello affiance the reg then the gabriello hector the neale. If something hector the neale and it is falciform then it oxidize the gabriello. If something oxidize the gabriello and it affiance the gabriello then the gabriello oxidize the neale. If something hector the gabriello then the gabriello affiance the reg. If the neale is unsavory and the neale does not visit the gabriello then the gabriello is addable. The gabriello hector the neale.", "logic": "\nHector(reg, neale)\nnot Hector(reg, gabriello)\nAffiance(reg, neale)\nAffiance(reg, gabriello)\nnot Oxidize(reg, neale)\nOxidize(reg, gabriello)\nAddable(neale)\nnot Affiance(neale, reg)\nOxidize(neale, reg)\nnot Politic(gabriello)\nAddable(gabriello)\nFalciform(gabriello)\nAffiance(gabriello, reg)\nOxidize(gabriello, reg)\nOxidize(gabriello, neale)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, gabriello) and Affiance(x, reg) -> Politic(reg))\nOxidize(reg, gabriello) and Affiance(gabriello, reg) -> Hector(gabriello, neale)\nforall x (Hector(x, neale) and Falciform(x) -> Oxidize(x, gabriello))\nforall x (Oxidize(x, gabriello) and Affiance(x, gabriello) -> Oxidize(gabriello, neale))\nforall x (Hector(x, gabriello) -> Affiance(gabriello, reg))\nUnsavory(neale) and not Oxidize(neale, gabriello) -> Addable(gabriello)\n\nHector(gabriello, neale)\n\nOxidize(reg, gabriello) and Affiance(gabriello, reg) and Oxidize(reg, gabriello) and Affiance(gabriello, reg) -> Hector(gabriello, neale) -> therefore Hector(gabriello, neale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The corabel brocade the stefania. The corabel does not eat the sebastian. The corabel ankylose the stefania. The corabel ankylose the sebastian. The corabel does not visit the stefania. The corabel mold the sebastian. The stefania is inner. The stefania does not see the corabel. The stefania mold the corabel. The sebastian is not believable. The sebastian is inner. The sebastian is goofy. The sebastian ankylose the corabel. The sebastian mold the corabel. The sebastian mold the stefania. If something mold the sebastian and it ankylose the corabel then the corabel is believable. If the corabel mold the sebastian and the sebastian ankylose the corabel then the sebastian brocade the stefania. If something brocade the stefania and it is goofy then it mold the sebastian. If something mold the sebastian and it ankylose the sebastian then the sebastian mold the stefania. If something brocade the sebastian then the sebastian ankylose the corabel. If the stefania is staple and the stefania does not visit the sebastian then the sebastian is inner. The sebastian does not eat the stefania.", "logic": "\nBrocade(corabel, stefania)\nnot Brocade(corabel, sebastian)\nAnkylose(corabel, stefania)\nAnkylose(corabel, sebastian)\nnot Mold(corabel, stefania)\nMold(corabel, sebastian)\nInner(stefania)\nnot Ankylose(stefania, corabel)\nMold(stefania, corabel)\nnot Believable(sebastian)\nInner(sebastian)\nGoofy(sebastian)\nAnkylose(sebastian, corabel)\nMold(sebastian, corabel)\nMold(sebastian, stefania)\nforall x (Mold(x, sebastian) and Ankylose(x, corabel) -> Believable(corabel))\nMold(corabel, sebastian) and Ankylose(sebastian, corabel) -> Brocade(sebastian, stefania)\nforall x (Brocade(x, stefania) and Goofy(x) -> Mold(x, sebastian))\nforall x (Mold(x, sebastian) and Ankylose(x, sebastian) -> Mold(sebastian, stefania))\nforall x (Brocade(x, sebastian) -> Ankylose(sebastian, corabel))\nStaple(stefania) and not Mold(stefania, sebastian) -> Inner(sebastian)\n\nnot Brocade(sebastian, stefania)\n\nMold(corabel, sebastian) and Ankylose(sebastian, corabel) and Mold(corabel, sebastian) and Ankylose(sebastian, corabel) -> Brocade(sebastian, stefania) -> therefore Brocade(sebastian, stefania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The simeon talc the henryetta. The simeon does not eat the janaye. The simeon calve the henryetta. The simeon calve the janaye. The simeon does not visit the henryetta. The simeon palatalize the janaye. The henryetta is uncultured. The henryetta does not see the simeon. The henryetta palatalize the simeon. The janaye is not ferned. The janaye is uncultured. The janaye is sexual. The janaye calve the simeon. The janaye palatalize the simeon. The janaye palatalize the henryetta. If something palatalize the janaye and it calve the simeon then the simeon is ferned. If the simeon palatalize the janaye and the janaye calve the simeon then the janaye talc the henryetta. If something talc the henryetta and it is sexual then it palatalize the janaye. If something palatalize the janaye and it calve the janaye then the janaye palatalize the henryetta. If something talc the janaye then the janaye calve the simeon. If the henryetta is entrancing and the henryetta does not visit the janaye then the janaye is uncultured. The janaye palatalize the janaye.", "logic": "\nTalc(simeon, henryetta)\nnot Talc(simeon, janaye)\nCalve(simeon, henryetta)\nCalve(simeon, janaye)\nnot Palatalize(simeon, henryetta)\nPalatalize(simeon, janaye)\nUncultured(henryetta)\nnot Calve(henryetta, simeon)\nPalatalize(henryetta, simeon)\nnot Ferned(janaye)\nUncultured(janaye)\nSexual(janaye)\nCalve(janaye, simeon)\nPalatalize(janaye, simeon)\nPalatalize(janaye, henryetta)\nforall x (Palatalize(x, janaye) and Calve(x, simeon) -> Ferned(simeon))\nPalatalize(simeon, janaye) and Calve(janaye, simeon) -> Talc(janaye, henryetta)\nforall x (Talc(x, henryetta) and Sexual(x) -> Palatalize(x, janaye))\nforall x (Palatalize(x, janaye) and Calve(x, janaye) -> Palatalize(janaye, henryetta))\nforall x (Talc(x, janaye) -> Calve(janaye, simeon))\nEntrancing(henryetta) and not Palatalize(henryetta, janaye) -> Uncultured(janaye)\n\nPalatalize(janaye, janaye)\n\nPalatalize(simeon, janaye) and Calve(janaye, simeon) and Palatalize(simeon, janaye) and Calve(janaye, simeon) -> Talc(janaye, henryetta) -> therefore Talc(janaye, henryetta) Talc(janaye, henryetta) and Sexual(janaye) and forall x (Talc(x, henryetta) and Sexual(x) -> Palatalize(x, janaye)) -> therefore Palatalize(janaye, janaye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The anya defeminize the eveleen. The anya does not eat the kerstin. The anya quash the eveleen. The anya quash the kerstin. The anya does not visit the eveleen. The anya erupt the kerstin. The eveleen is vixenish. The eveleen does not see the anya. The eveleen erupt the anya. The kerstin is not philistine. The kerstin is vixenish. The kerstin is corrosive. The kerstin quash the anya. The kerstin erupt the anya. The kerstin erupt the eveleen. If something erupt the kerstin and it quash the anya then the anya is philistine. If the anya erupt the kerstin and the kerstin quash the anya then the kerstin defeminize the eveleen. If something defeminize the eveleen and it is corrosive then it erupt the kerstin. If something erupt the kerstin and it quash the kerstin then the kerstin erupt the eveleen. If something defeminize the kerstin then the kerstin quash the anya. If the eveleen is merry and the eveleen does not visit the kerstin then the kerstin is vixenish. The kerstin does not visit the kerstin.", "logic": "\nDefeminize(anya, eveleen)\nnot Defeminize(anya, kerstin)\nQuash(anya, eveleen)\nQuash(anya, kerstin)\nnot Erupt(anya, eveleen)\nErupt(anya, kerstin)\nVixenish(eveleen)\nnot Quash(eveleen, anya)\nErupt(eveleen, anya)\nnot Philistine(kerstin)\nVixenish(kerstin)\nCorrosive(kerstin)\nQuash(kerstin, anya)\nErupt(kerstin, anya)\nErupt(kerstin, eveleen)\nforall x (Erupt(x, kerstin) and Quash(x, anya) -> Philistine(anya))\nErupt(anya, kerstin) and Quash(kerstin, anya) -> Defeminize(kerstin, eveleen)\nforall x (Defeminize(x, eveleen) and Corrosive(x) -> Erupt(x, kerstin))\nforall x (Erupt(x, kerstin) and Quash(x, kerstin) -> Erupt(kerstin, eveleen))\nforall x (Defeminize(x, kerstin) -> Quash(kerstin, anya))\nMerry(eveleen) and not Erupt(eveleen, kerstin) -> Vixenish(kerstin)\n\nnot Erupt(kerstin, kerstin)\n\nErupt(anya, kerstin) and Quash(kerstin, anya) and Erupt(anya, kerstin) and Quash(kerstin, anya) -> Defeminize(kerstin, eveleen) -> therefore Defeminize(kerstin, eveleen) Defeminize(kerstin, eveleen) and Corrosive(kerstin) and forall x (Defeminize(x, eveleen) and Corrosive(x) -> Erupt(x, kerstin)) -> therefore Erupt(kerstin, kerstin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The mercie begrudge the caralie. The mercie does not eat the braden. The mercie swop the caralie. The mercie swop the braden. The mercie does not visit the caralie. The mercie illuminate the braden. The caralie is orthogonal. The caralie does not see the mercie. The caralie illuminate the mercie. The braden is not choked. The braden is orthogonal. The braden is tabby. The braden swop the mercie. The braden illuminate the mercie. The braden illuminate the caralie. If something illuminate the braden and it swop the mercie then the mercie is choked. If the mercie illuminate the braden and the braden swop the mercie then the braden begrudge the caralie. If something begrudge the caralie and it is tabby then it illuminate the braden. If something illuminate the braden and it swop the braden then the braden illuminate the caralie. If something begrudge the braden then the braden swop the mercie. If the caralie is cancellate and the caralie does not visit the braden then the braden is orthogonal. The mercie is choked.", "logic": "\nBegrudge(mercie, caralie)\nnot Begrudge(mercie, braden)\nSwop(mercie, caralie)\nSwop(mercie, braden)\nnot Illuminate(mercie, caralie)\nIlluminate(mercie, braden)\nOrthogonal(caralie)\nnot Swop(caralie, mercie)\nIlluminate(caralie, mercie)\nnot Choked(braden)\nOrthogonal(braden)\nTabby(braden)\nSwop(braden, mercie)\nIlluminate(braden, mercie)\nIlluminate(braden, caralie)\nforall x (Illuminate(x, braden) and Swop(x, mercie) -> Choked(mercie))\nIlluminate(mercie, braden) and Swop(braden, mercie) -> Begrudge(braden, caralie)\nforall x (Begrudge(x, caralie) and Tabby(x) -> Illuminate(x, braden))\nforall x (Illuminate(x, braden) and Swop(x, braden) -> Illuminate(braden, caralie))\nforall x (Begrudge(x, braden) -> Swop(braden, mercie))\nCancellate(caralie) and not Illuminate(caralie, braden) -> Orthogonal(braden)\n\nChoked(mercie)\n\nIlluminate(mercie, braden) and Swop(braden, mercie) and Illuminate(mercie, braden) and Swop(braden, mercie) -> Begrudge(braden, caralie) -> therefore Begrudge(braden, caralie) Begrudge(braden, caralie) and Tabby(braden) and forall x (Begrudge(x, caralie) and Tabby(x) -> Illuminate(x, braden)) -> therefore Illuminate(braden, braden) Illuminate(braden, braden) and Swop(braden, mercie) and forall x (Illuminate(x, braden) and Swop(x, mercie) -> Choked(mercie)) -> therefore Choked(mercie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The fanchon grease the julia. The fanchon does not eat the min. The fanchon carpenter the julia. The fanchon carpenter the min. The fanchon does not visit the julia. The fanchon frank the min. The julia is alienated. The julia does not see the fanchon. The julia frank the fanchon. The min is not dextrous. The min is alienated. The min is colourful. The min carpenter the fanchon. The min frank the fanchon. The min frank the julia. If something frank the min and it carpenter the fanchon then the fanchon is dextrous. If the fanchon frank the min and the min carpenter the fanchon then the min grease the julia. If something grease the julia and it is colourful then it frank the min. If something frank the min and it carpenter the min then the min frank the julia. If something grease the min then the min carpenter the fanchon. If the julia is alarming and the julia does not visit the min then the min is alienated. The fanchon is not dextrous.", "logic": "\nGrease(fanchon, julia)\nnot Grease(fanchon, min)\nCarpenter(fanchon, julia)\nCarpenter(fanchon, min)\nnot Frank(fanchon, julia)\nFrank(fanchon, min)\nAlienated(julia)\nnot Carpenter(julia, fanchon)\nFrank(julia, fanchon)\nnot Dextrous(min)\nAlienated(min)\nColourful(min)\nCarpenter(min, fanchon)\nFrank(min, fanchon)\nFrank(min, julia)\nforall x (Frank(x, min) and Carpenter(x, fanchon) -> Dextrous(fanchon))\nFrank(fanchon, min) and Carpenter(min, fanchon) -> Grease(min, julia)\nforall x (Grease(x, julia) and Colourful(x) -> Frank(x, min))\nforall x (Frank(x, min) and Carpenter(x, min) -> Frank(min, julia))\nforall x (Grease(x, min) -> Carpenter(min, fanchon))\nAlarming(julia) and not Frank(julia, min) -> Alienated(min)\n\nnot Dextrous(fanchon)\n\nFrank(fanchon, min) and Carpenter(min, fanchon) and Frank(fanchon, min) and Carpenter(min, fanchon) -> Grease(min, julia) -> therefore Grease(min, julia) Grease(min, julia) and Colourful(min) and forall x (Grease(x, julia) and Colourful(x) -> Frank(x, min)) -> therefore Frank(min, min) Frank(min, min) and Carpenter(min, fanchon) and forall x (Frank(x, min) and Carpenter(x, fanchon) -> Dextrous(fanchon)) -> therefore Dextrous(fanchon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The colleen candle the roni. The colleen does not eat the shari. The colleen eyewitness the roni. The colleen eyewitness the shari. The colleen does not visit the roni. The colleen concern the shari. The roni is asymptotic. The roni does not see the colleen. The roni concern the colleen. The shari is not boxy. The shari is asymptotic. The shari is dimorphous. The shari eyewitness the colleen. The shari concern the colleen. The shari concern the roni. If something concern the shari and it eyewitness the colleen then the colleen is boxy. If the colleen concern the shari and the shari eyewitness the colleen then the shari candle the roni. If something candle the roni and it is dimorphous then it concern the shari. If something concern the shari and it eyewitness the shari then the shari concern the roni. If something candle the shari then the shari eyewitness the colleen. If the roni is unsubdued and the roni does not visit the shari then the shari is asymptotic. The roni does not visit the shari.", "logic": "\nCandle(colleen, roni)\nnot Candle(colleen, shari)\nEyewitness(colleen, roni)\nEyewitness(colleen, shari)\nnot Concern(colleen, roni)\nConcern(colleen, shari)\nAsymptotic(roni)\nnot Eyewitness(roni, colleen)\nConcern(roni, colleen)\nnot Boxy(shari)\nAsymptotic(shari)\nDimorphous(shari)\nEyewitness(shari, colleen)\nConcern(shari, colleen)\nConcern(shari, roni)\nforall x (Concern(x, shari) and Eyewitness(x, colleen) -> Boxy(colleen))\nConcern(colleen, shari) and Eyewitness(shari, colleen) -> Candle(shari, roni)\nforall x (Candle(x, roni) and Dimorphous(x) -> Concern(x, shari))\nforall x (Concern(x, shari) and Eyewitness(x, shari) -> Concern(shari, roni))\nforall x (Candle(x, shari) -> Eyewitness(shari, colleen))\nUnsubdued(roni) and not Concern(roni, shari) -> Asymptotic(shari)\n\nnot Concern(roni, shari)\n\nforall x (Candle(x, roni) and Dimorphous(x) -> Concern(x, shari)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The myrta forge the lorrayne. The myrta does not eat the daisi. The myrta sterilise the lorrayne. The myrta sterilise the daisi. The myrta does not visit the lorrayne. The myrta illegalize the daisi. The lorrayne is unavowed. The lorrayne does not see the myrta. The lorrayne illegalize the myrta. The daisi is not prescribed. The daisi is unavowed. The daisi is hircine. The daisi sterilise the myrta. The daisi illegalize the myrta. The daisi illegalize the lorrayne. If something illegalize the daisi and it sterilise the myrta then the myrta is prescribed. If the myrta illegalize the daisi and the daisi sterilise the myrta then the daisi forge the lorrayne. If something forge the lorrayne and it is hircine then it illegalize the daisi. If something illegalize the daisi and it sterilise the daisi then the daisi illegalize the lorrayne. If something forge the daisi then the daisi sterilise the myrta. If the lorrayne is permeable and the lorrayne does not visit the daisi then the daisi is unavowed. The lorrayne sterilise the lorrayne.", "logic": "\nForge(myrta, lorrayne)\nnot Forge(myrta, daisi)\nSterilise(myrta, lorrayne)\nSterilise(myrta, daisi)\nnot Illegalize(myrta, lorrayne)\nIllegalize(myrta, daisi)\nUnavowed(lorrayne)\nnot Sterilise(lorrayne, myrta)\nIllegalize(lorrayne, myrta)\nnot Prescribed(daisi)\nUnavowed(daisi)\nHircine(daisi)\nSterilise(daisi, myrta)\nIllegalize(daisi, myrta)\nIllegalize(daisi, lorrayne)\nforall x (Illegalize(x, daisi) and Sterilise(x, myrta) -> Prescribed(myrta))\nIllegalize(myrta, daisi) and Sterilise(daisi, myrta) -> Forge(daisi, lorrayne)\nforall x (Forge(x, lorrayne) and Hircine(x) -> Illegalize(x, daisi))\nforall x (Illegalize(x, daisi) and Sterilise(x, daisi) -> Illegalize(daisi, lorrayne))\nforall x (Forge(x, daisi) -> Sterilise(daisi, myrta))\nPermeable(lorrayne) and not Illegalize(lorrayne, daisi) -> Unavowed(daisi)\n\nSterilise(lorrayne, lorrayne)\n\nSterilise(lorrayne, lorrayne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The janette sequester the jacquette. The janette does not eat the burgess. The janette mimeograph the jacquette. The janette mimeograph the burgess. The janette does not visit the jacquette. The janette steam the burgess. The jacquette is desiccate. The jacquette does not see the janette. The jacquette steam the janette. The burgess is not nonextant. The burgess is desiccate. The burgess is neonatal. The burgess mimeograph the janette. The burgess steam the janette. The burgess steam the jacquette. If something steam the burgess and it mimeograph the janette then the janette is nonextant. If the janette steam the burgess and the burgess mimeograph the janette then the burgess sequester the jacquette. If something sequester the jacquette and it is neonatal then it steam the burgess. If something steam the burgess and it mimeograph the burgess then the burgess steam the jacquette. If something sequester the burgess then the burgess mimeograph the janette. If the jacquette is puzzling and the jacquette does not visit the burgess then the burgess is desiccate. The janette is not neonatal.", "logic": "\nSequester(janette, jacquette)\nnot Sequester(janette, burgess)\nMimeograph(janette, jacquette)\nMimeograph(janette, burgess)\nnot Steam(janette, jacquette)\nSteam(janette, burgess)\nDesiccate(jacquette)\nnot Mimeograph(jacquette, janette)\nSteam(jacquette, janette)\nnot Nonextant(burgess)\nDesiccate(burgess)\nNeonatal(burgess)\nMimeograph(burgess, janette)\nSteam(burgess, janette)\nSteam(burgess, jacquette)\nforall x (Steam(x, burgess) and Mimeograph(x, janette) -> Nonextant(janette))\nSteam(janette, burgess) and Mimeograph(burgess, janette) -> Sequester(burgess, jacquette)\nforall x (Sequester(x, jacquette) and Neonatal(x) -> Steam(x, burgess))\nforall x (Steam(x, burgess) and Mimeograph(x, burgess) -> Steam(burgess, jacquette))\nforall x (Sequester(x, burgess) -> Mimeograph(burgess, janette))\nPuzzling(jacquette) and not Steam(jacquette, burgess) -> Desiccate(burgess)\n\nnot Neonatal(janette)\n\nnot Neonatal(janette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The archon grapple the clayton. The archon does not eat the prudence. The archon doom the clayton. The archon doom the prudence. The archon does not visit the clayton. The archon subsidize the prudence. The clayton is downstream. The clayton does not see the archon. The clayton subsidize the archon. The prudence is not biting. The prudence is downstream. The prudence is allargando. The prudence doom the archon. The prudence subsidize the archon. The prudence subsidize the clayton. If something subsidize the prudence and it doom the archon then the archon is biting. If the archon subsidize the prudence and the prudence doom the archon then the prudence grapple the clayton. If something grapple the clayton and it is allargando then it subsidize the prudence. If something subsidize the prudence and it doom the prudence then the prudence subsidize the clayton. If something grapple the prudence then the prudence doom the archon. If the clayton is visionary and the clayton does not visit the prudence then the prudence is downstream. The archon is visionary.", "logic": "\nGrapple(archon, clayton)\nnot Grapple(archon, prudence)\nDoom(archon, clayton)\nDoom(archon, prudence)\nnot Subsidize(archon, clayton)\nSubsidize(archon, prudence)\nDownstream(clayton)\nnot Doom(clayton, archon)\nSubsidize(clayton, archon)\nnot Biting(prudence)\nDownstream(prudence)\nAllargando(prudence)\nDoom(prudence, archon)\nSubsidize(prudence, archon)\nSubsidize(prudence, clayton)\nforall x (Subsidize(x, prudence) and Doom(x, archon) -> Biting(archon))\nSubsidize(archon, prudence) and Doom(prudence, archon) -> Grapple(prudence, clayton)\nforall x (Grapple(x, clayton) and Allargando(x) -> Subsidize(x, prudence))\nforall x (Subsidize(x, prudence) and Doom(x, prudence) -> Subsidize(prudence, clayton))\nforall x (Grapple(x, prudence) -> Doom(prudence, archon))\nVisionary(clayton) and not Subsidize(clayton, prudence) -> Downstream(prudence)\n\nVisionary(archon)\n\nVisionary(archon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The darice raven the wes. The darice does not eat the angelle. The darice reclassify the wes. The darice reclassify the angelle. The darice does not visit the wes. The darice implement the angelle. The wes is skew. The wes does not see the darice. The wes implement the darice. The angelle is not thenar. The angelle is skew. The angelle is purgative. The angelle reclassify the darice. The angelle implement the darice. The angelle implement the wes. If something implement the angelle and it reclassify the darice then the darice is thenar. If the darice implement the angelle and the angelle reclassify the darice then the angelle raven the wes. If something raven the wes and it is purgative then it implement the angelle. If something implement the angelle and it reclassify the angelle then the angelle implement the wes. If something raven the angelle then the angelle reclassify the darice. If the wes is standard and the wes does not visit the angelle then the angelle is skew. The angelle is not nice.", "logic": "\nRaven(darice, wes)\nnot Raven(darice, angelle)\nReclassify(darice, wes)\nReclassify(darice, angelle)\nnot Implement(darice, wes)\nImplement(darice, angelle)\nSkew(wes)\nnot Reclassify(wes, darice)\nImplement(wes, darice)\nnot Thenar(angelle)\nSkew(angelle)\nPurgative(angelle)\nReclassify(angelle, darice)\nImplement(angelle, darice)\nImplement(angelle, wes)\nforall x (Implement(x, angelle) and Reclassify(x, darice) -> Thenar(darice))\nImplement(darice, angelle) and Reclassify(angelle, darice) -> Raven(angelle, wes)\nforall x (Raven(x, wes) and Purgative(x) -> Implement(x, angelle))\nforall x (Implement(x, angelle) and Reclassify(x, angelle) -> Implement(angelle, wes))\nforall x (Raven(x, angelle) -> Reclassify(angelle, darice))\nStandard(wes) and not Implement(wes, angelle) -> Skew(angelle)\n\nnot Nice(angelle)\n\nnot Nice(angelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The issie shadowbox the katha. The issie does not eat the gideon. The issie survive the katha. The issie survive the gideon. The issie does not visit the katha. The issie intermit the gideon. The katha is relieved. The katha does not see the issie. The katha intermit the issie. The gideon is not banded. The gideon is relieved. The gideon is silent. The gideon survive the issie. The gideon intermit the issie. The gideon intermit the katha. If something intermit the gideon and it survive the issie then the issie is banded. If the issie intermit the gideon and the gideon survive the issie then the gideon shadowbox the katha. If something shadowbox the katha and it is silent then it intermit the gideon. If something intermit the gideon and it survive the gideon then the gideon intermit the katha. If something shadowbox the gideon then the gideon survive the issie. If the katha is baritone and the katha does not visit the gideon then the gideon is relieved. The gideon survive the katha.", "logic": "\nShadowbox(issie, katha)\nnot Shadowbox(issie, gideon)\nSurvive(issie, katha)\nSurvive(issie, gideon)\nnot Intermit(issie, katha)\nIntermit(issie, gideon)\nRelieved(katha)\nnot Survive(katha, issie)\nIntermit(katha, issie)\nnot Banded(gideon)\nRelieved(gideon)\nSilent(gideon)\nSurvive(gideon, issie)\nIntermit(gideon, issie)\nIntermit(gideon, katha)\nforall x (Intermit(x, gideon) and Survive(x, issie) -> Banded(issie))\nIntermit(issie, gideon) and Survive(gideon, issie) -> Shadowbox(gideon, katha)\nforall x (Shadowbox(x, katha) and Silent(x) -> Intermit(x, gideon))\nforall x (Intermit(x, gideon) and Survive(x, gideon) -> Intermit(gideon, katha))\nforall x (Shadowbox(x, gideon) -> Survive(gideon, issie))\nBaritone(katha) and not Intermit(katha, gideon) -> Relieved(gideon)\n\nSurvive(gideon, katha)\n\nSurvive(gideon, katha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The corly tolerate the calla. The corly does not eat the corry. The corly jaundice the calla. The corly jaundice the corry. The corly does not visit the calla. The corly camber the corry. The calla is leguminous. The calla does not see the corly. The calla camber the corly. The corry is not gross. The corry is leguminous. The corry is unwedded. The corry jaundice the corly. The corry camber the corly. The corry camber the calla. If something camber the corry and it jaundice the corly then the corly is gross. If the corly camber the corry and the corry jaundice the corly then the corry tolerate the calla. If something tolerate the calla and it is unwedded then it camber the corry. If something camber the corry and it jaundice the corry then the corry camber the calla. If something tolerate the corry then the corry jaundice the corly. If the calla is disdainful and the calla does not visit the corry then the corry is leguminous. The corly does not visit the corly.", "logic": "\nTolerate(corly, calla)\nnot Tolerate(corly, corry)\nJaundice(corly, calla)\nJaundice(corly, corry)\nnot Camber(corly, calla)\nCamber(corly, corry)\nLeguminous(calla)\nnot Jaundice(calla, corly)\nCamber(calla, corly)\nnot Gross(corry)\nLeguminous(corry)\nUnwedded(corry)\nJaundice(corry, corly)\nCamber(corry, corly)\nCamber(corry, calla)\nforall x (Camber(x, corry) and Jaundice(x, corly) -> Gross(corly))\nCamber(corly, corry) and Jaundice(corry, corly) -> Tolerate(corry, calla)\nforall x (Tolerate(x, calla) and Unwedded(x) -> Camber(x, corry))\nforall x (Camber(x, corry) and Jaundice(x, corry) -> Camber(corry, calla))\nforall x (Tolerate(x, corry) -> Jaundice(corry, corly))\nDisdainful(calla) and not Camber(calla, corry) -> Leguminous(corry)\n\nnot Camber(corly, corly)\n\nnot Camber(corly, corly) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The kordula verge the nari. The kordula does not eat the rustin. The kordula remunerate the nari. The kordula remunerate the rustin. The kordula does not visit the nari. The kordula treadle the rustin. The nari is meatless. The nari does not see the kordula. The nari treadle the kordula. The rustin is not chiasmal. The rustin is meatless. The rustin is stagy. The rustin remunerate the kordula. The rustin treadle the kordula. The rustin treadle the nari. If something treadle the rustin and it remunerate the kordula then the kordula is chiasmal. If the kordula treadle the rustin and the rustin remunerate the kordula then the rustin verge the nari. If something verge the nari and it is stagy then it treadle the rustin. If something treadle the rustin and it remunerate the rustin then the rustin treadle the nari. If something verge the rustin then the rustin remunerate the kordula. If the nari is corneal and the nari does not visit the rustin then the rustin is meatless. The nari is chiasmal.", "logic": "\nVerge(kordula, nari)\nnot Verge(kordula, rustin)\nRemunerate(kordula, nari)\nRemunerate(kordula, rustin)\nnot Treadle(kordula, nari)\nTreadle(kordula, rustin)\nMeatless(nari)\nnot Remunerate(nari, kordula)\nTreadle(nari, kordula)\nnot Chiasmal(rustin)\nMeatless(rustin)\nStagy(rustin)\nRemunerate(rustin, kordula)\nTreadle(rustin, kordula)\nTreadle(rustin, nari)\nforall x (Treadle(x, rustin) and Remunerate(x, kordula) -> Chiasmal(kordula))\nTreadle(kordula, rustin) and Remunerate(rustin, kordula) -> Verge(rustin, nari)\nforall x (Verge(x, nari) and Stagy(x) -> Treadle(x, rustin))\nforall x (Treadle(x, rustin) and Remunerate(x, rustin) -> Treadle(rustin, nari))\nforall x (Verge(x, rustin) -> Remunerate(rustin, kordula))\nCorneal(nari) and not Treadle(nari, rustin) -> Meatless(rustin)\n\nChiasmal(nari)\n\nChiasmal(nari) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-936"} {"premises": "The andriette hoodoo the archibold. The andriette is congenial. The andriette is donnish. The andriette is instant. The andriette is urbanized. The andriette is withered. The andriette claw the archibold. The andriette predestine the archibold. The archibold hoodoo the andriette. The archibold is congenial. The archibold is donnish. The archibold is instant. The archibold is urbanized. The archibold is withered. The archibold claw the andriette. The archibold predestine the andriette. If something hoodoo the andriette and it hoodoo the archibold then it predestine the archibold. If something predestine the archibold then it claw the archibold. If something is urbanized then it claw the andriette. If something predestine the andriette then the andriette is withered. If something is congenial then it hoodoo the archibold. If the andriette predestine the archibold and the archibold is donnish then the andriette claw the archibold. The archibold claw the andriette.", "logic": "\nHoodoo(andriette, archibold)\nCongenial(andriette)\nDonnish(andriette)\nInstant(andriette)\nUrbanized(andriette)\nWithered(andriette)\nClaw(andriette, archibold)\nPredestine(andriette, archibold)\nHoodoo(archibold, andriette)\nCongenial(archibold)\nDonnish(archibold)\nInstant(archibold)\nUrbanized(archibold)\nWithered(archibold)\nClaw(archibold, andriette)\nPredestine(archibold, andriette)\nforall x (Hoodoo(x, andriette) and Hoodoo(x, archibold) -> Predestine(x, archibold))\nforall x (Predestine(x, archibold) -> Claw(x, archibold))\nforall x (Urbanized(x) -> Claw(x, andriette))\nforall x (Predestine(x, andriette) -> Withered(andriette))\nforall x (Congenial(x) -> Hoodoo(x, archibold))\nPredestine(andriette, archibold) and Donnish(archibold) -> Claw(andriette, archibold)\n\nClaw(archibold, andriette)\n\ntherefore Claw(archibold, andriette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The cornelle impoverish the mattias. The cornelle is fragile. The cornelle is unpillared. The cornelle is gushing. The cornelle is lowermost. The cornelle is collect. The cornelle copyread the mattias. The cornelle scuff the mattias. The mattias impoverish the cornelle. The mattias is fragile. The mattias is unpillared. The mattias is gushing. The mattias is lowermost. The mattias is collect. The mattias copyread the cornelle. The mattias scuff the cornelle. If something impoverish the cornelle and it impoverish the mattias then it scuff the mattias. If something scuff the mattias then it copyread the mattias. If something is lowermost then it copyread the cornelle. If something scuff the cornelle then the cornelle is collect. If something is fragile then it impoverish the mattias. If the cornelle scuff the mattias and the mattias is unpillared then the cornelle copyread the mattias. The cornelle does not need the mattias.", "logic": "\nImpoverish(cornelle, mattias)\nFragile(cornelle)\nUnpillared(cornelle)\nGushing(cornelle)\nLowermost(cornelle)\nCollect(cornelle)\nCopyread(cornelle, mattias)\nScuff(cornelle, mattias)\nImpoverish(mattias, cornelle)\nFragile(mattias)\nUnpillared(mattias)\nGushing(mattias)\nLowermost(mattias)\nCollect(mattias)\nCopyread(mattias, cornelle)\nScuff(mattias, cornelle)\nforall x (Impoverish(x, cornelle) and Impoverish(x, mattias) -> Scuff(x, mattias))\nforall x (Scuff(x, mattias) -> Copyread(x, mattias))\nforall x (Lowermost(x) -> Copyread(x, cornelle))\nforall x (Scuff(x, cornelle) -> Collect(cornelle))\nforall x (Fragile(x) -> Impoverish(x, mattias))\nScuff(cornelle, mattias) and Unpillared(mattias) -> Copyread(cornelle, mattias)\n\nnot Copyread(cornelle, mattias)\n\ntherefore Copyread(cornelle, mattias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The drake legislate the syd. The drake is riemannian. The drake is outlawed. The drake is reactive. The drake is basal. The drake is apogamic. The drake unteach the syd. The drake tippytoe the syd. The syd legislate the drake. The syd is riemannian. The syd is outlawed. The syd is reactive. The syd is basal. The syd is apogamic. The syd unteach the drake. The syd tippytoe the drake. If something legislate the drake and it legislate the syd then it tippytoe the syd. If something tippytoe the syd then it unteach the syd. If something is basal then it unteach the drake. If something tippytoe the drake then the drake is apogamic. If something is riemannian then it legislate the syd. If the drake tippytoe the syd and the syd is outlawed then the drake unteach the syd. The drake unteach the drake.", "logic": "\nLegislate(drake, syd)\nRiemannian(drake)\nOutlawed(drake)\nReactive(drake)\nBasal(drake)\nApogamic(drake)\nUnteach(drake, syd)\nTippytoe(drake, syd)\nLegislate(syd, drake)\nRiemannian(syd)\nOutlawed(syd)\nReactive(syd)\nBasal(syd)\nApogamic(syd)\nUnteach(syd, drake)\nTippytoe(syd, drake)\nforall x (Legislate(x, drake) and Legislate(x, syd) -> Tippytoe(x, syd))\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, syd) -> Unteach(x, syd))\nforall x (Basal(x) -> Unteach(x, drake))\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, drake) -> Apogamic(drake))\nforall x (Riemannian(x) -> Legislate(x, syd))\nTippytoe(drake, syd) and Outlawed(syd) -> Unteach(drake, syd)\n\nUnteach(drake, drake)\n\nBasal(drake) and forall x (Basal(x) -> Unteach(x, drake)) -> therefore Unteach(drake, drake)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The alejandra scat the vicky. The alejandra is beta. The alejandra is primaeval. The alejandra is unsoured. The alejandra is greyish. The alejandra is aslope. The alejandra choir the vicky. The alejandra whipsaw the vicky. The vicky scat the alejandra. The vicky is beta. The vicky is primaeval. The vicky is unsoured. The vicky is greyish. The vicky is aslope. The vicky choir the alejandra. The vicky whipsaw the alejandra. If something scat the alejandra and it scat the vicky then it whipsaw the vicky. If something whipsaw the vicky then it choir the vicky. If something is greyish then it choir the alejandra. If something whipsaw the alejandra then the alejandra is aslope. If something is beta then it scat the vicky. If the alejandra whipsaw the vicky and the vicky is primaeval then the alejandra choir the vicky. The alejandra does not need the alejandra.", "logic": "\nScat(alejandra, vicky)\nBeta(alejandra)\nPrimaeval(alejandra)\nUnsoured(alejandra)\nGreyish(alejandra)\nAslope(alejandra)\nChoir(alejandra, vicky)\nWhipsaw(alejandra, vicky)\nScat(vicky, alejandra)\nBeta(vicky)\nPrimaeval(vicky)\nUnsoured(vicky)\nGreyish(vicky)\nAslope(vicky)\nChoir(vicky, alejandra)\nWhipsaw(vicky, alejandra)\nforall x (Scat(x, alejandra) and Scat(x, vicky) -> Whipsaw(x, vicky))\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, vicky) -> Choir(x, vicky))\nforall x (Greyish(x) -> Choir(x, alejandra))\nforall x (Whipsaw(x, alejandra) -> Aslope(alejandra))\nforall x (Beta(x) -> Scat(x, vicky))\nWhipsaw(alejandra, vicky) and Primaeval(vicky) -> Choir(alejandra, vicky)\n\nnot Choir(alejandra, alejandra)\n\nGreyish(alejandra) and forall x (Greyish(x) -> Choir(x, alejandra)) -> therefore Choir(alejandra, alejandra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The nertie pleach the daria. The nertie is leftmost. The nertie is tenebrious. The nertie is built. The nertie is lacustrine. The nertie is jumbled. The nertie sack the daria. The nertie smother the daria. The daria pleach the nertie. The daria is leftmost. The daria is tenebrious. The daria is built. The daria is lacustrine. The daria is jumbled. The daria sack the nertie. The daria smother the nertie. If something pleach the nertie and it pleach the daria then it smother the daria. If something smother the daria then it sack the daria. If something is lacustrine then it sack the nertie. If something smother the nertie then the nertie is jumbled. If something is leftmost then it pleach the daria. If the nertie smother the daria and the daria is tenebrious then the nertie sack the daria. The daria smother the daria.", "logic": "\nPleach(nertie, daria)\nLeftmost(nertie)\nTenebrious(nertie)\nBuilt(nertie)\nLacustrine(nertie)\nJumbled(nertie)\nSack(nertie, daria)\nSmother(nertie, daria)\nPleach(daria, nertie)\nLeftmost(daria)\nTenebrious(daria)\nBuilt(daria)\nLacustrine(daria)\nJumbled(daria)\nSack(daria, nertie)\nSmother(daria, nertie)\nforall x (Pleach(x, nertie) and Pleach(x, daria) -> Smother(x, daria))\nforall x (Smother(x, daria) -> Sack(x, daria))\nforall x (Lacustrine(x) -> Sack(x, nertie))\nforall x (Smother(x, nertie) -> Jumbled(nertie))\nforall x (Leftmost(x) -> Pleach(x, daria))\nSmother(nertie, daria) and Tenebrious(daria) -> Sack(nertie, daria)\n\nSmother(daria, daria)\n\nLeftmost(daria) and forall x (Leftmost(x) -> Pleach(x, daria)) -> therefore Pleach(daria, daria) Pleach(daria, nertie) and Pleach(daria, daria) and forall x (Pleach(x, nertie) and Pleach(x, daria) -> Smother(x, daria)) -> therefore Smother(daria, daria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The alf collate the gunner. The alf is stripy. The alf is slashing. The alf is gleaming. The alf is sterilised. The alf is unseeable. The alf sedate the gunner. The alf penalise the gunner. The gunner collate the alf. The gunner is stripy. The gunner is slashing. The gunner is gleaming. The gunner is sterilised. The gunner is unseeable. The gunner sedate the alf. The gunner penalise the alf. If something collate the alf and it collate the gunner then it penalise the gunner. If something penalise the gunner then it sedate the gunner. If something is sterilised then it sedate the alf. If something penalise the alf then the alf is unseeable. If something is stripy then it collate the gunner. If the alf penalise the gunner and the gunner is slashing then the alf sedate the gunner. The gunner does not see the gunner.", "logic": "\nCollate(alf, gunner)\nStripy(alf)\nSlashing(alf)\nGleaming(alf)\nSterilised(alf)\nUnseeable(alf)\nSedate(alf, gunner)\nPenalise(alf, gunner)\nCollate(gunner, alf)\nStripy(gunner)\nSlashing(gunner)\nGleaming(gunner)\nSterilised(gunner)\nUnseeable(gunner)\nSedate(gunner, alf)\nPenalise(gunner, alf)\nforall x (Collate(x, alf) and Collate(x, gunner) -> Penalise(x, gunner))\nforall x (Penalise(x, gunner) -> Sedate(x, gunner))\nforall x (Sterilised(x) -> Sedate(x, alf))\nforall x (Penalise(x, alf) -> Unseeable(alf))\nforall x (Stripy(x) -> Collate(x, gunner))\nPenalise(alf, gunner) and Slashing(gunner) -> Sedate(alf, gunner)\n\nnot Penalise(gunner, gunner)\n\nStripy(gunner) and forall x (Stripy(x) -> Collate(x, gunner)) -> therefore Collate(gunner, gunner) Collate(gunner, alf) and Collate(gunner, gunner) and forall x (Collate(x, alf) and Collate(x, gunner) -> Penalise(x, gunner)) -> therefore Penalise(gunner, gunner)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The bellanca inspire the jefferson. The bellanca is mensal. The bellanca is explosive. The bellanca is discharged. The bellanca is sanctified. The bellanca is nomothetic. The bellanca ream the jefferson. The bellanca tabularise the jefferson. The jefferson inspire the bellanca. The jefferson is mensal. The jefferson is explosive. The jefferson is discharged. The jefferson is sanctified. The jefferson is nomothetic. The jefferson ream the bellanca. The jefferson tabularise the bellanca. If something inspire the bellanca and it inspire the jefferson then it tabularise the jefferson. If something tabularise the jefferson then it ream the jefferson. If something is sanctified then it ream the bellanca. If something tabularise the bellanca then the bellanca is nomothetic. If something is mensal then it inspire the jefferson. If the bellanca tabularise the jefferson and the jefferson is explosive then the bellanca ream the jefferson. The jefferson ream the jefferson.", "logic": "\nInspire(bellanca, jefferson)\nMensal(bellanca)\nExplosive(bellanca)\nDischarged(bellanca)\nSanctified(bellanca)\nNomothetic(bellanca)\nReam(bellanca, jefferson)\nTabularise(bellanca, jefferson)\nInspire(jefferson, bellanca)\nMensal(jefferson)\nExplosive(jefferson)\nDischarged(jefferson)\nSanctified(jefferson)\nNomothetic(jefferson)\nReam(jefferson, bellanca)\nTabularise(jefferson, bellanca)\nforall x (Inspire(x, bellanca) and Inspire(x, jefferson) -> Tabularise(x, jefferson))\nforall x (Tabularise(x, jefferson) -> Ream(x, jefferson))\nforall x (Sanctified(x) -> Ream(x, bellanca))\nforall x (Tabularise(x, bellanca) -> Nomothetic(bellanca))\nforall x (Mensal(x) -> Inspire(x, jefferson))\nTabularise(bellanca, jefferson) and Explosive(jefferson) -> Ream(bellanca, jefferson)\n\nReam(jefferson, jefferson)\n\nMensal(jefferson) and forall x (Mensal(x) -> Inspire(x, jefferson)) -> therefore Inspire(jefferson, jefferson) Inspire(jefferson, bellanca) and Inspire(jefferson, jefferson) and forall x (Inspire(x, bellanca) and Inspire(x, jefferson) -> Tabularise(x, jefferson)) -> therefore Tabularise(jefferson, jefferson) Tabularise(jefferson, jefferson) and forall x (Tabularise(x, jefferson) -> Ream(x, jefferson)) -> therefore Ream(jefferson, jefferson)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The brewster brood the gennie. The brewster is jaundiced. The brewster is musty. The brewster is hortatory. The brewster is schmalzy. The brewster is crackers. The brewster sire the gennie. The brewster bellyache the gennie. The gennie brood the brewster. The gennie is jaundiced. The gennie is musty. The gennie is hortatory. The gennie is schmalzy. The gennie is crackers. The gennie sire the brewster. The gennie bellyache the brewster. If something brood the brewster and it brood the gennie then it bellyache the gennie. If something bellyache the gennie then it sire the gennie. If something is schmalzy then it sire the brewster. If something bellyache the brewster then the brewster is crackers. If something is jaundiced then it brood the gennie. If the brewster bellyache the gennie and the gennie is musty then the brewster sire the gennie. The gennie does not need the gennie.", "logic": "\nBrood(brewster, gennie)\nJaundiced(brewster)\nMusty(brewster)\nHortatory(brewster)\nSchmalzy(brewster)\nCrackers(brewster)\nSire(brewster, gennie)\nBellyache(brewster, gennie)\nBrood(gennie, brewster)\nJaundiced(gennie)\nMusty(gennie)\nHortatory(gennie)\nSchmalzy(gennie)\nCrackers(gennie)\nSire(gennie, brewster)\nBellyache(gennie, brewster)\nforall x (Brood(x, brewster) and Brood(x, gennie) -> Bellyache(x, gennie))\nforall x (Bellyache(x, gennie) -> Sire(x, gennie))\nforall x (Schmalzy(x) -> Sire(x, brewster))\nforall x (Bellyache(x, brewster) -> Crackers(brewster))\nforall x (Jaundiced(x) -> Brood(x, gennie))\nBellyache(brewster, gennie) and Musty(gennie) -> Sire(brewster, gennie)\n\nnot Sire(gennie, gennie)\n\nJaundiced(gennie) and forall x (Jaundiced(x) -> Brood(x, gennie)) -> therefore Brood(gennie, gennie) Brood(gennie, brewster) and Brood(gennie, gennie) and forall x (Brood(x, brewster) and Brood(x, gennie) -> Bellyache(x, gennie)) -> therefore Bellyache(gennie, gennie) Bellyache(gennie, gennie) and forall x (Bellyache(x, gennie) -> Sire(x, gennie)) -> therefore Sire(gennie, gennie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The wally analyse the julee. The wally is nonopening. The wally is eremitic. The wally is fragile. The wally is consensual. The wally is sagacious. The wally arrange the julee. The wally numb the julee. The julee analyse the wally. The julee is nonopening. The julee is eremitic. The julee is fragile. The julee is consensual. The julee is sagacious. The julee arrange the wally. The julee numb the wally. If something analyse the wally and it analyse the julee then it numb the julee. If something numb the julee then it arrange the julee. If something is consensual then it arrange the wally. If something numb the wally then the wally is sagacious. If something is nonopening then it analyse the julee. If the wally numb the julee and the julee is eremitic then the wally arrange the julee. The wally does not see the wally.", "logic": "\nAnalyse(wally, julee)\nNonopening(wally)\nEremitic(wally)\nFragile(wally)\nConsensual(wally)\nSagacious(wally)\nArrange(wally, julee)\nNumb(wally, julee)\nAnalyse(julee, wally)\nNonopening(julee)\nEremitic(julee)\nFragile(julee)\nConsensual(julee)\nSagacious(julee)\nArrange(julee, wally)\nNumb(julee, wally)\nforall x (Analyse(x, wally) and Analyse(x, julee) -> Numb(x, julee))\nforall x (Numb(x, julee) -> Arrange(x, julee))\nforall x (Consensual(x) -> Arrange(x, wally))\nforall x (Numb(x, wally) -> Sagacious(wally))\nforall x (Nonopening(x) -> Analyse(x, julee))\nNumb(wally, julee) and Eremitic(julee) -> Arrange(wally, julee)\n\nnot Numb(wally, wally)\n\nnot Numb(wally, wally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "The laverna guggle the augustus. The laverna is newborn. The laverna is deceitful. The laverna is found. The laverna is auspicious. The laverna is unmusical. The laverna rape the augustus. The laverna hush the augustus. The augustus guggle the laverna. The augustus is newborn. The augustus is deceitful. The augustus is found. The augustus is auspicious. The augustus is unmusical. The augustus rape the laverna. The augustus hush the laverna. If something guggle the laverna and it guggle the augustus then it hush the augustus. If something hush the augustus then it rape the augustus. If something is auspicious then it rape the laverna. If something hush the laverna then the laverna is unmusical. If something is newborn then it guggle the augustus. If the laverna hush the augustus and the augustus is deceitful then the laverna rape the augustus. The laverna guggle the laverna.", "logic": "\nGuggle(laverna, augustus)\nNewborn(laverna)\nDeceitful(laverna)\nFound(laverna)\nAuspicious(laverna)\nUnmusical(laverna)\nRape(laverna, augustus)\nHush(laverna, augustus)\nGuggle(augustus, laverna)\nNewborn(augustus)\nDeceitful(augustus)\nFound(augustus)\nAuspicious(augustus)\nUnmusical(augustus)\nRape(augustus, laverna)\nHush(augustus, laverna)\nforall x (Guggle(x, laverna) and Guggle(x, augustus) -> Hush(x, augustus))\nforall x (Hush(x, augustus) -> Rape(x, augustus))\nforall x (Auspicious(x) -> Rape(x, laverna))\nforall x (Hush(x, laverna) -> Unmusical(laverna))\nforall x (Newborn(x) -> Guggle(x, augustus))\nHush(laverna, augustus) and Deceitful(augustus) -> Rape(laverna, augustus)\n\nGuggle(laverna, laverna)\n\nGuggle(laverna, laverna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1350"} {"premises": "Georgeta is writhen. Rudie is aguish. Rudie is uncheerful. If Rudie is writhen then Rudie is uncheerful. If Georgeta is aguish then Georgeta is bicornate. If something is cognitive and spent then it is bicornate. Smart things are cognitive. If Rudie is continuant then Rudie is bicornate. If something is aguish then it is writhen. Georgeta is writhen.", "logic": "\nWrithen(georgeta)\nAguish(rudie)\nUncheerful(rudie)\nWrithen(rudie) -> Uncheerful(rudie)\nAguish(georgeta) -> Bicornate(georgeta)\nforall x (Cognitive(x) and Spent(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Bicornate(x) -> Cognitive(x))\nContinuant(rudie) -> Bicornate(rudie)\nforall x (Aguish(x) -> Writhen(x))\n\nWrithen(georgeta)\n\ntherefore Writhen(georgeta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1100"} {"premises": "Daffy is ameboid. Brietta is covered. Brietta is unaware. If Brietta is ameboid then Brietta is unaware. If Daffy is covered then Daffy is innocuous. If something is unreported and blastemic then it is innocuous. Smart things are unreported. If Brietta is beautiful then Brietta is innocuous. If something is covered then it is ameboid. Brietta is not covered.", "logic": "\nAmeboid(daffy)\nCovered(brietta)\nUnaware(brietta)\nAmeboid(brietta) -> Unaware(brietta)\nCovered(daffy) -> Innocuous(daffy)\nforall x (Unreported(x) and Blastemic(x) -> Innocuous(x))\nforall x (Innocuous(x) -> Unreported(x))\nBeautiful(brietta) -> Innocuous(brietta)\nforall x (Covered(x) -> Ameboid(x))\n\nnot Covered(brietta)\n\ntherefore Covered(brietta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1100"} {"premises": "Helga is five. Cherrita is jocose. Cherrita is lean. If Cherrita is five then Cherrita is lean. If Helga is jocose then Helga is clausal. If something is periodic and median then it is clausal. Smart things are periodic. If Cherrita is buxom then Cherrita is clausal. If something is jocose then it is five. Cherrita is not periodic.", "logic": "\nFive(helga)\nJocose(cherrita)\nLean(cherrita)\nFive(cherrita) -> Lean(cherrita)\nJocose(helga) -> Clausal(helga)\nforall x (Periodic(x) and Median(x) -> Clausal(x))\nforall x (Clausal(x) -> Periodic(x))\nBuxom(cherrita) -> Clausal(cherrita)\nforall x (Jocose(x) -> Five(x))\n\nnot Periodic(cherrita)\n\nforall x (Clausal(x) -> Periodic(x)) <- forall x (Periodic(x) and Median(x) -> Clausal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1100"} {"premises": "Paco is skilled. Sinead is inapposite. Sinead is necessary. If Sinead is skilled then Sinead is necessary. If Paco is inapposite then Paco is purposeful. If something is relaxant and sensate then it is purposeful. Smart things are relaxant. If Sinead is brisk then Sinead is purposeful. If something is inapposite then it is skilled. Paco is sensate.", "logic": "\nSkilled(paco)\nInapposite(sinead)\nNecessary(sinead)\nSkilled(sinead) -> Necessary(sinead)\nInapposite(paco) -> Purposeful(paco)\nforall x (Relaxant(x) and Sensate(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nforall x (Purposeful(x) -> Relaxant(x))\nBrisk(sinead) -> Purposeful(sinead)\nforall x (Inapposite(x) -> Skilled(x))\n\nSensate(paco)\n\nSensate(paco) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-1100"} {"premises": "Anni is ignited. Anni is rash. Berget is dyspeptic. Berget is carotid. Berget is ignited. Berget is ethnologic. Berget is warring. Berget is rash. Berget is dextrorsal. Schuyler is dyspeptic. Schuyler is ethnologic. Schuyler is rash. If Schuyler is ignited then Schuyler is dextrorsal. All ethnologic people are carotid. All dextrorsal people are ignited. Nice, warring people are rash. If someone is rash and warring then they are ethnologic. If someone is dyspeptic then they are ignited. Berget is dyspeptic.", "logic": "\nIgnited(anni)\nRash(anni)\nDyspeptic(berget)\nCarotid(berget)\nIgnited(berget)\nEthnologic(berget)\nWarring(berget)\nRash(berget)\nDextrorsal(berget)\nDyspeptic(schuyler)\nEthnologic(schuyler)\nRash(schuyler)\nIgnited(schuyler) -> Dextrorsal(schuyler)\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> Carotid(x))\nforall x (Dextrorsal(x) -> Ignited(x))\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) and Warring(x) -> Rash(x))\nforall x (Rash(x) and Warring(x) -> Ethnologic(x))\nforall x (Dyspeptic(x) -> Ignited(x))\n\nDyspeptic(berget)\n\ntherefore Dyspeptic(berget)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Arleta is spinous. Arleta is lightsome. Donica is syncopated. Donica is degenerate. Donica is spinous. Donica is preserved. Donica is frenetic. Donica is lightsome. Donica is tenfold. Rosemaria is syncopated. Rosemaria is preserved. Rosemaria is lightsome. If Rosemaria is spinous then Rosemaria is tenfold. All preserved people are degenerate. All tenfold people are spinous. Nice, frenetic people are lightsome. If someone is lightsome and frenetic then they are preserved. If someone is syncopated then they are spinous. Rosemaria is not preserved.", "logic": "\nSpinous(arleta)\nLightsome(arleta)\nSyncopated(donica)\nDegenerate(donica)\nSpinous(donica)\nPreserved(donica)\nFrenetic(donica)\nLightsome(donica)\nTenfold(donica)\nSyncopated(rosemaria)\nPreserved(rosemaria)\nLightsome(rosemaria)\nSpinous(rosemaria) -> Tenfold(rosemaria)\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Degenerate(x))\nforall x (Tenfold(x) -> Spinous(x))\nforall x (Preserved(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) and Frenetic(x) -> Preserved(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) -> Spinous(x))\n\nnot Preserved(rosemaria)\n\ntherefore Preserved(rosemaria)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Dena is formalized. Dena is caulescent. Wyndham is realizable. Wyndham is celluloid. Wyndham is formalized. Wyndham is groundless. Wyndham is rueful. Wyndham is caulescent. Wyndham is pedigreed. Maxi is realizable. Maxi is groundless. Maxi is caulescent. If Maxi is formalized then Maxi is pedigreed. All groundless people are celluloid. All pedigreed people are formalized. Nice, rueful people are caulescent. If someone is caulescent and rueful then they are groundless. If someone is realizable then they are formalized. Maxi is celluloid.", "logic": "\nFormalized(dena)\nCaulescent(dena)\nRealizable(wyndham)\nCelluloid(wyndham)\nFormalized(wyndham)\nGroundless(wyndham)\nRueful(wyndham)\nCaulescent(wyndham)\nPedigreed(wyndham)\nRealizable(maxi)\nGroundless(maxi)\nCaulescent(maxi)\nFormalized(maxi) -> Pedigreed(maxi)\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Celluloid(x))\nforall x (Pedigreed(x) -> Formalized(x))\nforall x (Groundless(x) and Rueful(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Caulescent(x) and Rueful(x) -> Groundless(x))\nforall x (Realizable(x) -> Formalized(x))\n\nCelluloid(maxi)\n\nGroundless(maxi) and forall x (Groundless(x) -> Celluloid(x)) -> therefore Celluloid(maxi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Maurise is directive. Maurise is colourless. Eba is canonised. Eba is blamable. Eba is directive. Eba is ferned. Eba is unhumorous. Eba is colourless. Eba is foliaceous. Merline is canonised. Merline is ferned. Merline is colourless. If Merline is directive then Merline is foliaceous. All ferned people are blamable. All foliaceous people are directive. Nice, unhumorous people are colourless. If someone is colourless and unhumorous then they are ferned. If someone is canonised then they are directive. Merline is not directive.", "logic": "\nDirective(maurise)\nColourless(maurise)\nCanonised(eba)\nBlamable(eba)\nDirective(eba)\nFerned(eba)\nUnhumorous(eba)\nColourless(eba)\nFoliaceous(eba)\nCanonised(merline)\nFerned(merline)\nColourless(merline)\nDirective(merline) -> Foliaceous(merline)\nforall x (Ferned(x) -> Blamable(x))\nforall x (Foliaceous(x) -> Directive(x))\nforall x (Ferned(x) and Unhumorous(x) -> Colourless(x))\nforall x (Colourless(x) and Unhumorous(x) -> Ferned(x))\nforall x (Canonised(x) -> Directive(x))\n\nnot Directive(merline)\n\nCanonised(merline) and forall x (Canonised(x) -> Directive(x)) -> therefore Directive(merline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Angeline is refutable. Angeline is intrusive. Melinde is stilted. Melinde is indicatory. Melinde is refutable. Melinde is lustful. Melinde is uncial. Melinde is intrusive. Melinde is treated. Dewey is stilted. Dewey is lustful. Dewey is intrusive. If Dewey is refutable then Dewey is treated. All lustful people are indicatory. All treated people are refutable. Nice, uncial people are intrusive. If someone is intrusive and uncial then they are lustful. If someone is stilted then they are refutable. Dewey is treated.", "logic": "\nRefutable(angeline)\nIntrusive(angeline)\nStilted(melinde)\nIndicatory(melinde)\nRefutable(melinde)\nLustful(melinde)\nUncial(melinde)\nIntrusive(melinde)\nTreated(melinde)\nStilted(dewey)\nLustful(dewey)\nIntrusive(dewey)\nRefutable(dewey) -> Treated(dewey)\nforall x (Lustful(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Treated(x) -> Refutable(x))\nforall x (Lustful(x) and Uncial(x) -> Intrusive(x))\nforall x (Intrusive(x) and Uncial(x) -> Lustful(x))\nforall x (Stilted(x) -> Refutable(x))\n\nTreated(dewey)\n\nStilted(dewey) and forall x (Stilted(x) -> Refutable(x)) -> therefore Refutable(dewey) Refutable(dewey) and Refutable(dewey) -> Treated(dewey) -> therefore Treated(dewey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Annabel is adulterous. Annabel is untimbered. Muhammad is snowbound. Muhammad is causal. Muhammad is adulterous. Muhammad is exorbitant. Muhammad is mucinous. Muhammad is untimbered. Muhammad is wistful. Robena is snowbound. Robena is exorbitant. Robena is untimbered. If Robena is adulterous then Robena is wistful. All exorbitant people are causal. All wistful people are adulterous. Nice, mucinous people are untimbered. If someone is untimbered and mucinous then they are exorbitant. If someone is snowbound then they are adulterous. Robena is not wistful.", "logic": "\nAdulterous(annabel)\nUntimbered(annabel)\nSnowbound(muhammad)\nCausal(muhammad)\nAdulterous(muhammad)\nExorbitant(muhammad)\nMucinous(muhammad)\nUntimbered(muhammad)\nWistful(muhammad)\nSnowbound(robena)\nExorbitant(robena)\nUntimbered(robena)\nAdulterous(robena) -> Wistful(robena)\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) -> Causal(x))\nforall x (Wistful(x) -> Adulterous(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) and Mucinous(x) -> Untimbered(x))\nforall x (Untimbered(x) and Mucinous(x) -> Exorbitant(x))\nforall x (Snowbound(x) -> Adulterous(x))\n\nnot Wistful(robena)\n\nSnowbound(robena) and forall x (Snowbound(x) -> Adulterous(x)) -> therefore Adulterous(robena) Adulterous(robena) and Adulterous(robena) -> Wistful(robena) -> therefore Wistful(robena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Donella is coarctate. Donella is coagulated. Gredel is prisonlike. Gredel is grassy. Gredel is coarctate. Gredel is appraising. Gredel is clashing. Gredel is coagulated. Gredel is placatory. Zea is prisonlike. Zea is appraising. Zea is coagulated. If Zea is coarctate then Zea is placatory. All appraising people are grassy. All placatory people are coarctate. Nice, clashing people are coagulated. If someone is coagulated and clashing then they are appraising. If someone is prisonlike then they are coarctate. Donella is not appraising.", "logic": "\nCoarctate(donella)\nCoagulated(donella)\nPrisonlike(gredel)\nGrassy(gredel)\nCoarctate(gredel)\nAppraising(gredel)\nClashing(gredel)\nCoagulated(gredel)\nPlacatory(gredel)\nPrisonlike(zea)\nAppraising(zea)\nCoagulated(zea)\nCoarctate(zea) -> Placatory(zea)\nforall x (Appraising(x) -> Grassy(x))\nforall x (Placatory(x) -> Coarctate(x))\nforall x (Appraising(x) and Clashing(x) -> Coagulated(x))\nforall x (Coagulated(x) and Clashing(x) -> Appraising(x))\nforall x (Prisonlike(x) -> Coarctate(x))\n\nnot Appraising(donella)\n\nforall x (Coagulated(x) and Clashing(x) -> Appraising(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Sallyanne is reedy. Sallyanne is repulsive. Tabby is unshakable. Tabby is palmate. Tabby is reedy. Tabby is biliary. Tabby is waxlike. Tabby is repulsive. Tabby is fluid. Beatrice is unshakable. Beatrice is biliary. Beatrice is repulsive. If Beatrice is reedy then Beatrice is fluid. All biliary people are palmate. All fluid people are reedy. Nice, waxlike people are repulsive. If someone is repulsive and waxlike then they are biliary. If someone is unshakable then they are reedy. Sallyanne is palmate.", "logic": "\nReedy(sallyanne)\nRepulsive(sallyanne)\nUnshakable(tabby)\nPalmate(tabby)\nReedy(tabby)\nBiliary(tabby)\nWaxlike(tabby)\nRepulsive(tabby)\nFluid(tabby)\nUnshakable(beatrice)\nBiliary(beatrice)\nRepulsive(beatrice)\nReedy(beatrice) -> Fluid(beatrice)\nforall x (Biliary(x) -> Palmate(x))\nforall x (Fluid(x) -> Reedy(x))\nforall x (Biliary(x) and Waxlike(x) -> Repulsive(x))\nforall x (Repulsive(x) and Waxlike(x) -> Biliary(x))\nforall x (Unshakable(x) -> Reedy(x))\n\nPalmate(sallyanne)\n\nforall x (Biliary(x) -> Palmate(x)) <- forall x (Repulsive(x) and Waxlike(x) -> Biliary(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Mavra is hieratical. Mavra is inviolable. Magda is minoan. Magda is xviii. Magda is hieratical. Magda is pessimum. Magda is tall. Magda is inviolable. Magda is causeless. Guthrey is minoan. Guthrey is pessimum. Guthrey is inviolable. If Guthrey is hieratical then Guthrey is causeless. All pessimum people are xviii. All causeless people are hieratical. Nice, tall people are inviolable. If someone is inviolable and tall then they are pessimum. If someone is minoan then they are hieratical. Mavra is not tall.", "logic": "\nHieratical(mavra)\nInviolable(mavra)\nMinoan(magda)\nXviii(magda)\nHieratical(magda)\nPessimum(magda)\nTall(magda)\nInviolable(magda)\nCauseless(magda)\nMinoan(guthrey)\nPessimum(guthrey)\nInviolable(guthrey)\nHieratical(guthrey) -> Causeless(guthrey)\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Xviii(x))\nforall x (Causeless(x) -> Hieratical(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) and Tall(x) -> Inviolable(x))\nforall x (Inviolable(x) and Tall(x) -> Pessimum(x))\nforall x (Minoan(x) -> Hieratical(x))\n\nnot Tall(mavra)\n\nnot Tall(mavra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Cindie is myelinic. Cindie is asleep. Tarrant is eponymic. Tarrant is crapulous. Tarrant is myelinic. Tarrant is toiling. Tarrant is foldaway. Tarrant is asleep. Tarrant is albescent. Carie is eponymic. Carie is toiling. Carie is asleep. If Carie is myelinic then Carie is albescent. All toiling people are crapulous. All albescent people are myelinic. Nice, foldaway people are asleep. If someone is asleep and foldaway then they are toiling. If someone is eponymic then they are myelinic. Cindie is albescent.", "logic": "\nMyelinic(cindie)\nAsleep(cindie)\nEponymic(tarrant)\nCrapulous(tarrant)\nMyelinic(tarrant)\nToiling(tarrant)\nFoldaway(tarrant)\nAsleep(tarrant)\nAlbescent(tarrant)\nEponymic(carie)\nToiling(carie)\nAsleep(carie)\nMyelinic(carie) -> Albescent(carie)\nforall x (Toiling(x) -> Crapulous(x))\nforall x (Albescent(x) -> Myelinic(x))\nforall x (Toiling(x) and Foldaway(x) -> Asleep(x))\nforall x (Asleep(x) and Foldaway(x) -> Toiling(x))\nforall x (Eponymic(x) -> Myelinic(x))\n\nAlbescent(cindie)\n\nAlbescent(cindie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Amalia is motorial. Amalia is sacked. Tobias is perfidious. Tobias is bleached. Tobias is motorial. Tobias is frilly. Tobias is sunrise. Tobias is sacked. Tobias is urethral. Xenos is perfidious. Xenos is frilly. Xenos is sacked. If Xenos is motorial then Xenos is urethral. All frilly people are bleached. All urethral people are motorial. Nice, sunrise people are sacked. If someone is sacked and sunrise then they are frilly. If someone is perfidious then they are motorial. Amalia is not perfidious.", "logic": "\nMotorial(amalia)\nSacked(amalia)\nPerfidious(tobias)\nBleached(tobias)\nMotorial(tobias)\nFrilly(tobias)\nSunrise(tobias)\nSacked(tobias)\nUrethral(tobias)\nPerfidious(xenos)\nFrilly(xenos)\nSacked(xenos)\nMotorial(xenos) -> Urethral(xenos)\nforall x (Frilly(x) -> Bleached(x))\nforall x (Urethral(x) -> Motorial(x))\nforall x (Frilly(x) and Sunrise(x) -> Sacked(x))\nforall x (Sacked(x) and Sunrise(x) -> Frilly(x))\nforall x (Perfidious(x) -> Motorial(x))\n\nnot Perfidious(amalia)\n\nnot Perfidious(amalia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "Ravil is bodily. Ravil is embryotic. Cherise is fabulous. Cherise is menstrual. Cherise is bodily. Cherise is dormy. Cherise is lowland. Cherise is embryotic. Cherise is fledged. Cristie is fabulous. Cristie is dormy. Cristie is embryotic. If Cristie is bodily then Cristie is fledged. All dormy people are menstrual. All fledged people are bodily. Nice, lowland people are embryotic. If someone is embryotic and lowland then they are dormy. If someone is fabulous then they are bodily. Cristie is lowland.", "logic": "\nBodily(ravil)\nEmbryotic(ravil)\nFabulous(cherise)\nMenstrual(cherise)\nBodily(cherise)\nDormy(cherise)\nLowland(cherise)\nEmbryotic(cherise)\nFledged(cherise)\nFabulous(cristie)\nDormy(cristie)\nEmbryotic(cristie)\nBodily(cristie) -> Fledged(cristie)\nforall x (Dormy(x) -> Menstrual(x))\nforall x (Fledged(x) -> Bodily(x))\nforall x (Dormy(x) and Lowland(x) -> Embryotic(x))\nforall x (Embryotic(x) and Lowland(x) -> Dormy(x))\nforall x (Fabulous(x) -> Bodily(x))\n\nLowland(cristie)\n\nLowland(cristie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1375"} {"premises": "The mauritz is surefooted. The trude forsake the mauritz. The trude is campy. If something is surefooted then it fatigue the trude. The trude is campy.", "logic": "\nSurefooted(mauritz)\nForsake(trude, mauritz)\nCampy(trude)\nforall x (Surefooted(x) -> Fatigue(x, trude))\n\nCampy(trude)\n\ntherefore Campy(trude)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "The janna is improved. The halley habituate the janna. The halley is nosocomial. If something is improved then it revalue the halley. The halley does not chase the janna.", "logic": "\nImproved(janna)\nHabituate(halley, janna)\nNosocomial(halley)\nforall x (Improved(x) -> Revalue(x, halley))\n\nnot Habituate(halley, janna)\n\ntherefore Habituate(halley, janna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "The myrilla is cogitable. The annalisa obstipate the myrilla. The annalisa is whirring. If something is cogitable then it smear the annalisa. The myrilla smear the annalisa.", "logic": "\nCogitable(myrilla)\nObstipate(annalisa, myrilla)\nWhirring(annalisa)\nforall x (Cogitable(x) -> Smear(x, annalisa))\n\nSmear(myrilla, annalisa)\n\nCogitable(myrilla) and forall x (Cogitable(x) -> Smear(x, annalisa)) -> therefore Smear(myrilla, annalisa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "The juliann is uncool. The susy theologise the juliann. The susy is hunted. If something is uncool then it idolize the susy. The juliann does not see the susy.", "logic": "\nUncool(juliann)\nTheologise(susy, juliann)\nHunted(susy)\nforall x (Uncool(x) -> Idolize(x, susy))\n\nnot Idolize(juliann, susy)\n\nUncool(juliann) and forall x (Uncool(x) -> Idolize(x, susy)) -> therefore Idolize(juliann, susy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "The sofie is majuscule. The barbabra blub the sofie. The barbabra is steroidal. If something is majuscule then it schnorr the barbabra. The barbabra does not see the barbabra.", "logic": "\nMajuscule(sofie)\nBlub(barbabra, sofie)\nSteroidal(barbabra)\nforall x (Majuscule(x) -> Schnorr(x, barbabra))\n\nnot Schnorr(barbabra, barbabra)\n\nforall x (Majuscule(x) -> Schnorr(x, barbabra)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "The brena is addlepated. The margery typecast the brena. The margery is corporal. If something is addlepated then it reposit the margery. The brena reposit the brena.", "logic": "\nAddlepated(brena)\nTypecast(margery, brena)\nCorporal(margery)\nforall x (Addlepated(x) -> Reposit(x, margery))\n\nReposit(brena, brena)\n\nReposit(brena, brena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "The kittie is shaken. The randell misprint the kittie. The randell is wordy. If something is shaken then it authorize the randell. The kittie is not nice.", "logic": "\nShaken(kittie)\nMisprint(randell, kittie)\nWordy(randell)\nforall x (Shaken(x) -> Authorize(x, randell))\n\nnot Nice(kittie)\n\nnot Nice(kittie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "The flory is apathetic. The kathe filet the flory. The kathe is cerous. If something is apathetic then it intermit the kathe. The kathe needs the kathe.", "logic": "\nApathetic(flory)\nFilet(kathe, flory)\nCerous(kathe)\nforall x (Apathetic(x) -> Intermit(x, kathe))\n\nNeeds(kathe, kathe)\n\nNeeds(kathe, kathe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-283"} {"premises": "Avie is filled. Avie is milkless. Avie is tidal. Avie is pending. Avie is selfless. Avie is deistic. Thedrick is unpotted. Thedrick is filled. Thedrick is milkless. Thedrick is deistic. Nestor is not milkless. Nestor is deistic. If Avie is not filled then Avie is tidal. Thedrick is filled.", "logic": "\nFilled(avie)\nMilkless(avie)\nTidal(avie)\nPending(avie)\nSelfless(avie)\nDeistic(avie)\nUnpotted(thedrick)\nFilled(thedrick)\nMilkless(thedrick)\nDeistic(thedrick)\nnot Milkless(nestor)\nDeistic(nestor)\nnot Filled(avie) -> Tidal(avie)\n\nFilled(thedrick)\n\ntherefore Filled(thedrick)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3314"} {"premises": "Guthrie is afoot. Guthrie is immune. Guthrie is respective. Guthrie is unquiet. Guthrie is dodgy. Guthrie is duncical. Romeo is lxxvi. Romeo is afoot. Romeo is immune. Romeo is duncical. Petey is not immune. Petey is duncical. If Guthrie is not afoot then Guthrie is respective. Romeo is not lxxvi.", "logic": "\nAfoot(guthrie)\nImmune(guthrie)\nRespective(guthrie)\nUnquiet(guthrie)\nDodgy(guthrie)\nDuncical(guthrie)\nLxxvi(romeo)\nAfoot(romeo)\nImmune(romeo)\nDuncical(romeo)\nnot Immune(petey)\nDuncical(petey)\nnot Afoot(guthrie) -> Respective(guthrie)\n\nnot Lxxvi(romeo)\n\ntherefore Lxxvi(romeo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3314"} {"premises": "Carlota is psychic. Carlota is viii. Carlota is acuate. Carlota is bayesian. Carlota is unheeded. Carlota is overripe. Rubie is cliquish. Rubie is psychic. Rubie is viii. Rubie is overripe. Florentia is not viii. Florentia is overripe. If Carlota is not psychic then Carlota is acuate. Florentia is not cliquish.", "logic": "\nPsychic(carlota)\nViii(carlota)\nAcuate(carlota)\nBayesian(carlota)\nUnheeded(carlota)\nOverripe(carlota)\nCliquish(rubie)\nPsychic(rubie)\nViii(rubie)\nOverripe(rubie)\nnot Viii(florentia)\nOverripe(florentia)\nnot Psychic(carlota) -> Acuate(carlota)\n\nnot Cliquish(florentia)\n\nnot Cliquish(florentia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3314"} {"premises": "Sena is offended. Sena is anterior. Sena is aligned. Sena is baccate. Sena is subtropic. Sena is spirant. Zebulen is flexible. Zebulen is offended. Zebulen is anterior. Zebulen is spirant. Dulcea is not anterior. Dulcea is spirant. If Sena is not offended then Sena is aligned. Dulcea is offended.", "logic": "\nOffended(sena)\nAnterior(sena)\nAligned(sena)\nBaccate(sena)\nSubtropic(sena)\nSpirant(sena)\nFlexible(zebulen)\nOffended(zebulen)\nAnterior(zebulen)\nSpirant(zebulen)\nnot Anterior(dulcea)\nSpirant(dulcea)\nnot Offended(sena) -> Aligned(sena)\n\nOffended(dulcea)\n\nOffended(dulcea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3314"} {"premises": "Nathanael is niggling. Willie is bumptious. If someone is underdone then they are bumptious. If someone is natty and underdone then they are bumptious. All underdone people are niggling. If someone is bumptious and not underdone then they are not niggling. Quiet people are natty. If someone is bumptious and not underdone then they are fiberoptic. Nathanael is niggling.", "logic": "\nNiggling(nathanael)\nBumptious(willie)\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Natty(x) and Underdone(x) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> Niggling(x))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and not Underdone(x) -> not Niggling(x))\nforall x (Underdone(x) -> Natty(x))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and not Underdone(x) -> Fiberoptic(x))\n\nNiggling(nathanael)\n\ntherefore Niggling(nathanael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5261"} {"premises": "Arlo is inviolate. Hendrick is bicolour. If someone is inhumed then they are bicolour. If someone is syllabic and inhumed then they are bicolour. All inhumed people are inviolate. If someone is bicolour and not inhumed then they are not inviolate. Quiet people are syllabic. If someone is bicolour and not inhumed then they are jumbo. Arlo is not inviolate.", "logic": "\nInviolate(arlo)\nBicolour(hendrick)\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Bicolour(x))\nforall x (Syllabic(x) and Inhumed(x) -> Bicolour(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Inviolate(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and not Inhumed(x) -> not Inviolate(x))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Syllabic(x))\nforall x (Bicolour(x) and not Inhumed(x) -> Jumbo(x))\n\nnot Inviolate(arlo)\n\ntherefore Inviolate(arlo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5261"} {"premises": "Marcellus is pastel. Thia is thoracic. If someone is slim then they are thoracic. If someone is allogeneic and slim then they are thoracic. All slim people are pastel. If someone is thoracic and not slim then they are not pastel. Quiet people are allogeneic. If someone is thoracic and not slim then they are bullish. Thia is not allogeneic.", "logic": "\nPastel(marcellus)\nThoracic(thia)\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) and Slim(x) -> Thoracic(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Pastel(x))\nforall x (Thoracic(x) and not Slim(x) -> not Pastel(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Thoracic(x) and not Slim(x) -> Bullish(x))\n\nnot Allogeneic(thia)\n\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Allogeneic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5261"} {"premises": "Tarzan is unspoken. Karsten is restful. If someone is motive then they are restful. If someone is wizard and motive then they are restful. All motive people are unspoken. If someone is restful and not motive then they are not unspoken. Quiet people are wizard. If someone is restful and not motive then they are aplacental. Tarzan is smart.", "logic": "\nUnspoken(tarzan)\nRestful(karsten)\nforall x (Motive(x) -> Restful(x))\nforall x (Wizard(x) and Motive(x) -> Restful(x))\nforall x (Motive(x) -> Unspoken(x))\nforall x (Restful(x) and not Motive(x) -> not Unspoken(x))\nforall x (Motive(x) -> Wizard(x))\nforall x (Restful(x) and not Motive(x) -> Aplacental(x))\n\nSmart(tarzan)\n\nSmart(tarzan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-5261"} {"premises": "Joseph is spare. Furry people are undersize. All spare people are hapless. If someone is hapless then they are seedy. Joseph is spare.", "logic": "\nSpare(joseph)\nforall x (Hapless(x) -> Undersize(x))\nforall x (Spare(x) -> Hapless(x))\nforall x (Hapless(x) -> Seedy(x))\n\nSpare(joseph)\n\ntherefore Spare(joseph)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Hammad is admired. Furry people are bulgy. All admired people are ripened. If someone is ripened then they are short. Hammad is not admired.", "logic": "\nAdmired(hammad)\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Bulgy(x))\nforall x (Admired(x) -> Ripened(x))\nforall x (Ripened(x) -> Short(x))\n\nnot Admired(hammad)\n\ntherefore Admired(hammad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Ansell is suety. Furry people are urbanized. All suety people are protozoal. If someone is protozoal then they are parvenu. Ansell is protozoal.", "logic": "\nSuety(ansell)\nforall x (Protozoal(x) -> Urbanized(x))\nforall x (Suety(x) -> Protozoal(x))\nforall x (Protozoal(x) -> Parvenu(x))\n\nProtozoal(ansell)\n\nSuety(ansell) and forall x (Suety(x) -> Protozoal(x)) -> therefore Protozoal(ansell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Natale is stagnant. Furry people are chylous. All stagnant people are aminic. If someone is aminic then they are heady. Natale is not aminic.", "logic": "\nStagnant(natale)\nforall x (Aminic(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Stagnant(x) -> Aminic(x))\nforall x (Aminic(x) -> Heady(x))\n\nnot Aminic(natale)\n\nStagnant(natale) and forall x (Stagnant(x) -> Aminic(x)) -> therefore Aminic(natale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Anica is greatest. Furry people are chimeral. All greatest people are startled. If someone is startled then they are stagnant. Anica is chimeral.", "logic": "\nGreatest(anica)\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Chimeral(x))\nforall x (Greatest(x) -> Startled(x))\nforall x (Startled(x) -> Stagnant(x))\n\nChimeral(anica)\n\nGreatest(anica) and forall x (Greatest(x) -> Startled(x)) -> therefore Startled(anica) Startled(anica) and forall x (Startled(x) -> Chimeral(x)) -> therefore Chimeral(anica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Ethan is unmelted. Furry people are lentiform. All unmelted people are noted. If someone is noted then they are tabby. Ethan is not tabby.", "logic": "\nUnmelted(ethan)\nforall x (Noted(x) -> Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Unmelted(x) -> Noted(x))\nforall x (Noted(x) -> Tabby(x))\n\nnot Tabby(ethan)\n\nUnmelted(ethan) and forall x (Unmelted(x) -> Noted(x)) -> therefore Noted(ethan) Noted(ethan) and forall x (Noted(x) -> Tabby(x)) -> therefore Tabby(ethan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Chester is dotted. Furry people are gritty. All dotted people are oceanic. If someone is oceanic then they are permeant. Chester is not big.", "logic": "\nDotted(chester)\nforall x (Oceanic(x) -> Gritty(x))\nforall x (Dotted(x) -> Oceanic(x))\nforall x (Oceanic(x) -> Permeant(x))\n\nnot Big(chester)\n\nnot Big(chester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Rainer is prudish. Furry people are unearned. All prudish people are accented. If someone is accented then they are sleepless. Rainer is young.", "logic": "\nPrudish(rainer)\nforall x (Accented(x) -> Unearned(x))\nforall x (Prudish(x) -> Accented(x))\nforall x (Accented(x) -> Sleepless(x))\n\nYoung(rainer)\n\nYoung(rainer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1579"} {"premises": "Igor is not unlobed. Igor is graphic. Igor is endurable. Igor is scapular. Elmira is not unequal. Elmira is graphic. Elmira is not scapular. All endurable things are gilbertian. All scapular, unlobed things are endurable. Igor is not unlobed.", "logic": "\nnot Unlobed(igor)\nGraphic(igor)\nEndurable(igor)\nScapular(igor)\nnot Unequal(elmira)\nGraphic(elmira)\nnot Scapular(elmira)\nforall x (Endurable(x) -> Gilbertian(x))\nforall x (Scapular(x) and Unlobed(x) -> Endurable(x))\n\nnot Unlobed(igor)\n\ntherefore not Unlobed(igor)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6607"} {"premises": "Elayne is not motiveless. Elayne is kingly. Elayne is enhancive. Elayne is barefoot. Siobhan is not oversewn. Siobhan is kingly. Siobhan is not barefoot. All enhancive things are plodding. All barefoot, motiveless things are enhancive. Siobhan is not kingly.", "logic": "\nnot Motiveless(elayne)\nKingly(elayne)\nEnhancive(elayne)\nBarefoot(elayne)\nnot Oversewn(siobhan)\nKingly(siobhan)\nnot Barefoot(siobhan)\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Plodding(x))\nforall x (Barefoot(x) and Motiveless(x) -> Enhancive(x))\n\nnot Kingly(siobhan)\n\ntherefore Kingly(siobhan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6607"} {"premises": "Audry is not pondering. Audry is afrikaner. Audry is fraudulent. Audry is anticlinal. Truman is not thespian. Truman is afrikaner. Truman is not anticlinal. All fraudulent things are million. All anticlinal, pondering things are fraudulent. Truman is not fraudulent.", "logic": "\nnot Pondering(audry)\nAfrikaner(audry)\nFraudulent(audry)\nAnticlinal(audry)\nnot Thespian(truman)\nAfrikaner(truman)\nnot Anticlinal(truman)\nforall x (Fraudulent(x) -> Million(x))\nforall x (Anticlinal(x) and Pondering(x) -> Fraudulent(x))\n\nnot Fraudulent(truman)\n\nforall x (Anticlinal(x) and Pondering(x) -> Fraudulent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6607"} {"premises": "Dorene is not unshakable. Dorene is curricular. Dorene is tanned. Dorene is wireless. Micheal is not didactic. Micheal is curricular. Micheal is not wireless. All tanned things are aggressive. All wireless, unshakable things are tanned. Micheal is unshakable.", "logic": "\nnot Unshakable(dorene)\nCurricular(dorene)\nTanned(dorene)\nWireless(dorene)\nnot Didactic(micheal)\nCurricular(micheal)\nnot Wireless(micheal)\nforall x (Tanned(x) -> Aggressive(x))\nforall x (Wireless(x) and Unshakable(x) -> Tanned(x))\n\nUnshakable(micheal)\n\nUnshakable(micheal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-6607"} {"premises": "The lester is not blastular. The parnell throw the cordelie. The clea shred the parnell. The cordelie is caucasian. Young people are not descendent. The cordelie is caucasian.", "logic": "\nnot Blastular(lester)\nThrow(parnell, cordelie)\nShred(clea, parnell)\nCaucasian(cordelie)\nforall x (Folksy(x) -> not Descendent(x))\n\nCaucasian(cordelie)\n\ntherefore Caucasian(cordelie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-83"} {"premises": "The socrates is not flemish. The malanie moan the gearard. The otis testify the malanie. The gearard is leery. Young people are not anguished. The socrates is flemish.", "logic": "\nnot Flemish(socrates)\nMoan(malanie, gearard)\nTestify(otis, malanie)\nLeery(gearard)\nforall x (Salt(x) -> not Anguished(x))\n\nFlemish(socrates)\n\ntherefore not Flemish(socrates)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-83"} {"premises": "The margie is not blasted. The thom slenderise the lisetta. The renaud mongrelize the thom. The lisetta is aramean. Young people are not exploitive. The renaud is not cleanable.", "logic": "\nnot Blasted(margie)\nSlenderise(thom, lisetta)\nMongrelize(renaud, thom)\nAramean(lisetta)\nforall x (Cleanable(x) -> not Exploitive(x))\n\nnot Cleanable(renaud)\n\nnot Cleanable(renaud) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-83"} {"premises": "The neron is not adenoid. The penelope macadamise the godard. The kalindi ramp the penelope. The godard is colloidal. Young people are not mousey. The kalindi eats the kalindi.", "logic": "\nnot Adenoid(neron)\nMacadamise(penelope, godard)\nRamp(kalindi, penelope)\nColloidal(godard)\nforall x (Valved(x) -> not Mousey(x))\n\nEats(kalindi, kalindi)\n\nEats(kalindi, kalindi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-83"} {"premises": "Lanita is encyclical. All manic things are seeming. If Lanita is hurt and Lanita is manic then Lanita is seeming. All hurt, encyclical things are rimy. If something is seeming and manic then it is rimy. If Lanita is encyclical then Lanita is glandular. Kind things are manic. If something is encyclical and seeming then it is not dyed. If something is encyclical and manic then it is not dyed. Lanita is encyclical.", "logic": "\nEncyclical(lanita)\nforall x (Manic(x) -> Seeming(x))\nHurt(lanita) and Manic(lanita) -> Seeming(lanita)\nforall x (Hurt(x) and Encyclical(x) -> Rimy(x))\nforall x (Seeming(x) and Manic(x) -> Rimy(x))\nEncyclical(lanita) -> Glandular(lanita)\nforall x (Glandular(x) -> Manic(x))\nforall x (Encyclical(x) and Seeming(x) -> not Dyed(x))\nforall x (Encyclical(x) and Manic(x) -> not Dyed(x))\n\nEncyclical(lanita)\n\ntherefore Encyclical(lanita)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Stephanie is allantoid. All sigmoid things are unrigged. If Stephanie is repellant and Stephanie is sigmoid then Stephanie is unrigged. All repellant, allantoid things are dysgenic. If something is unrigged and sigmoid then it is dysgenic. If Stephanie is allantoid then Stephanie is wasteful. Kind things are sigmoid. If something is allantoid and unrigged then it is not beetling. If something is allantoid and sigmoid then it is not beetling. Stephanie is not allantoid.", "logic": "\nAllantoid(stephanie)\nforall x (Sigmoid(x) -> Unrigged(x))\nRepellant(stephanie) and Sigmoid(stephanie) -> Unrigged(stephanie)\nforall x (Repellant(x) and Allantoid(x) -> Dysgenic(x))\nforall x (Unrigged(x) and Sigmoid(x) -> Dysgenic(x))\nAllantoid(stephanie) -> Wasteful(stephanie)\nforall x (Wasteful(x) -> Sigmoid(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) and Unrigged(x) -> not Beetling(x))\nforall x (Allantoid(x) and Sigmoid(x) -> not Beetling(x))\n\nnot Allantoid(stephanie)\n\ntherefore Allantoid(stephanie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Sheffield is surprising. All vexed things are mastoidal. If Sheffield is scrambled and Sheffield is vexed then Sheffield is mastoidal. All scrambled, surprising things are british. If something is mastoidal and vexed then it is british. If Sheffield is surprising then Sheffield is tallish. Kind things are vexed. If something is surprising and mastoidal then it is not nauseating. If something is surprising and vexed then it is not nauseating. Sheffield is tallish.", "logic": "\nSurprising(sheffield)\nforall x (Vexed(x) -> Mastoidal(x))\nScrambled(sheffield) and Vexed(sheffield) -> Mastoidal(sheffield)\nforall x (Scrambled(x) and Surprising(x) -> British(x))\nforall x (Mastoidal(x) and Vexed(x) -> British(x))\nSurprising(sheffield) -> Tallish(sheffield)\nforall x (Tallish(x) -> Vexed(x))\nforall x (Surprising(x) and Mastoidal(x) -> not Nauseating(x))\nforall x (Surprising(x) and Vexed(x) -> not Nauseating(x))\n\nTallish(sheffield)\n\nSurprising(sheffield) and Surprising(sheffield) -> Tallish(sheffield) -> therefore Tallish(sheffield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Fifine is pestering. All aciduric things are burundi. If Fifine is civil and Fifine is aciduric then Fifine is burundi. All civil, pestering things are tickling. If something is burundi and aciduric then it is tickling. If Fifine is pestering then Fifine is andorran. Kind things are aciduric. If something is pestering and burundi then it is not enkindled. If something is pestering and aciduric then it is not enkindled. Fifine is not andorran.", "logic": "\nPestering(fifine)\nforall x (Aciduric(x) -> Burundi(x))\nCivil(fifine) and Aciduric(fifine) -> Burundi(fifine)\nforall x (Civil(x) and Pestering(x) -> Tickling(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) and Aciduric(x) -> Tickling(x))\nPestering(fifine) -> Andorran(fifine)\nforall x (Andorran(x) -> Aciduric(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) and Burundi(x) -> not Enkindled(x))\nforall x (Pestering(x) and Aciduric(x) -> not Enkindled(x))\n\nnot Andorran(fifine)\n\nPestering(fifine) and Pestering(fifine) -> Andorran(fifine) -> therefore Andorran(fifine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Petra is symbolical. All curly things are sculptured. If Petra is tearaway and Petra is curly then Petra is sculptured. All tearaway, symbolical things are jacksonian. If something is sculptured and curly then it is jacksonian. If Petra is symbolical then Petra is drunk. Kind things are curly. If something is symbolical and sculptured then it is not carmelite. If something is symbolical and curly then it is not carmelite. Petra is curly.", "logic": "\nSymbolical(petra)\nforall x (Curly(x) -> Sculptured(x))\nTearaway(petra) and Curly(petra) -> Sculptured(petra)\nforall x (Tearaway(x) and Symbolical(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nforall x (Sculptured(x) and Curly(x) -> Jacksonian(x))\nSymbolical(petra) -> Drunk(petra)\nforall x (Drunk(x) -> Curly(x))\nforall x (Symbolical(x) and Sculptured(x) -> not Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Symbolical(x) and Curly(x) -> not Carmelite(x))\n\nCurly(petra)\n\nSymbolical(petra) and Symbolical(petra) -> Drunk(petra) -> therefore Drunk(petra) Drunk(petra) and forall x (Drunk(x) -> Curly(x)) -> therefore Curly(petra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Sabine is diazo. All unbiassed things are embolic. If Sabine is ugly and Sabine is unbiassed then Sabine is embolic. All ugly, diazo things are communal. If something is embolic and unbiassed then it is communal. If Sabine is diazo then Sabine is yemeni. Kind things are unbiassed. If something is diazo and embolic then it is not ramous. If something is diazo and unbiassed then it is not ramous. Sabine is not unbiassed.", "logic": "\nDiazo(sabine)\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) -> Embolic(x))\nUgly(sabine) and Unbiassed(sabine) -> Embolic(sabine)\nforall x (Ugly(x) and Diazo(x) -> Communal(x))\nforall x (Embolic(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> Communal(x))\nDiazo(sabine) -> Yemeni(sabine)\nforall x (Yemeni(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Diazo(x) and Embolic(x) -> not Ramous(x))\nforall x (Diazo(x) and Unbiassed(x) -> not Ramous(x))\n\nnot Unbiassed(sabine)\n\nDiazo(sabine) and Diazo(sabine) -> Yemeni(sabine) -> therefore Yemeni(sabine) Yemeni(sabine) and forall x (Yemeni(x) -> Unbiassed(x)) -> therefore Unbiassed(sabine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Kylila is synovial. All dustlike things are coercive. If Kylila is olivelike and Kylila is dustlike then Kylila is coercive. All olivelike, synovial things are withdrawn. If something is coercive and dustlike then it is withdrawn. If Kylila is synovial then Kylila is acold. Kind things are dustlike. If something is synovial and coercive then it is not northmost. If something is synovial and dustlike then it is not northmost. Kylila is coercive.", "logic": "\nSynovial(kylila)\nforall x (Dustlike(x) -> Coercive(x))\nOlivelike(kylila) and Dustlike(kylila) -> Coercive(kylila)\nforall x (Olivelike(x) and Synovial(x) -> Withdrawn(x))\nforall x (Coercive(x) and Dustlike(x) -> Withdrawn(x))\nSynovial(kylila) -> Acold(kylila)\nforall x (Acold(x) -> Dustlike(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) and Coercive(x) -> not Northmost(x))\nforall x (Synovial(x) and Dustlike(x) -> not Northmost(x))\n\nCoercive(kylila)\n\nSynovial(kylila) and Synovial(kylila) -> Acold(kylila) -> therefore Acold(kylila) Acold(kylila) and forall x (Acold(x) -> Dustlike(x)) -> therefore Dustlike(kylila) Dustlike(kylila) and forall x (Dustlike(x) -> Coercive(x)) -> therefore Coercive(kylila)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Aubry is stodgy. All matt things are beguiled. If Aubry is barbadian and Aubry is matt then Aubry is beguiled. All barbadian, stodgy things are uncordial. If something is beguiled and matt then it is uncordial. If Aubry is stodgy then Aubry is aldermanly. Kind things are matt. If something is stodgy and beguiled then it is not staminate. If something is stodgy and matt then it is not staminate. Aubry is staminate.", "logic": "\nStodgy(aubry)\nforall x (Matt(x) -> Beguiled(x))\nBarbadian(aubry) and Matt(aubry) -> Beguiled(aubry)\nforall x (Barbadian(x) and Stodgy(x) -> Uncordial(x))\nforall x (Beguiled(x) and Matt(x) -> Uncordial(x))\nStodgy(aubry) -> Aldermanly(aubry)\nforall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Matt(x))\nforall x (Stodgy(x) and Beguiled(x) -> not Staminate(x))\nforall x (Stodgy(x) and Matt(x) -> not Staminate(x))\n\nStaminate(aubry)\n\nStodgy(aubry) and Stodgy(aubry) -> Aldermanly(aubry) -> therefore Aldermanly(aubry) Aldermanly(aubry) and forall x (Aldermanly(x) -> Matt(x)) -> therefore Matt(aubry) Stodgy(aubry) and Matt(aubry) and forall x (Stodgy(x) and Matt(x) -> not Staminate(x)) -> therefore not Staminate(aubry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-38"} {"premises": "Flynn is sensitive. Antonius is jolting. Gisela is protestant. Chelsy is sensitive. If Flynn is sensitive then Flynn is protestant. Antonius is jolting.", "logic": "\nSensitive(flynn)\nJolting(antonius)\nProtestant(gisela)\nSensitive(chelsy)\nSensitive(flynn) -> Protestant(flynn)\n\nJolting(antonius)\n\ntherefore Jolting(antonius)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Percival is overland. Selby is tahitian. Hattie is carotid. Myrtle is overland. If Percival is overland then Percival is carotid. Myrtle is not overland.", "logic": "\nOverland(percival)\nTahitian(selby)\nCarotid(hattie)\nOverland(myrtle)\nOverland(percival) -> Carotid(percival)\n\nnot Overland(myrtle)\n\ntherefore Overland(myrtle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Keeley is noncausal. Goose is tousled. Waiter is positivist. Lorenza is noncausal. If Keeley is noncausal then Keeley is positivist. Keeley is positivist.", "logic": "\nNoncausal(keeley)\nTousled(goose)\nPositivist(waiter)\nNoncausal(lorenza)\nNoncausal(keeley) -> Positivist(keeley)\n\nPositivist(keeley)\n\nNoncausal(keeley) and Noncausal(keeley) -> Positivist(keeley) -> therefore Positivist(keeley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Birgitta is awake. Marjie is skewed. Olwen is mawkish. Myrah is awake. If Birgitta is awake then Birgitta is mawkish. Birgitta is not mawkish.", "logic": "\nAwake(birgitta)\nSkewed(marjie)\nMawkish(olwen)\nAwake(myrah)\nAwake(birgitta) -> Mawkish(birgitta)\n\nnot Mawkish(birgitta)\n\nAwake(birgitta) and Awake(birgitta) -> Mawkish(birgitta) -> therefore Mawkish(birgitta)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Zsazsa is fearless. Dido is apocrine. Leoine is okay. Fernande is fearless. If Zsazsa is fearless then Zsazsa is okay. Fernande is not quiet.", "logic": "\nFearless(zsazsa)\nApocrine(dido)\nOkay(leoine)\nFearless(fernande)\nFearless(zsazsa) -> Okay(zsazsa)\n\nnot Quiet(fernande)\n\nnot Quiet(fernande) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Josy is galilean. Tiffy is turbulent. Gardiner is chaste. Guglielma is galilean. If Josy is galilean then Josy is chaste. Guglielma is white.", "logic": "\nGalilean(josy)\nTurbulent(tiffy)\nChaste(gardiner)\nGalilean(guglielma)\nGalilean(josy) -> Chaste(josy)\n\nWhite(guglielma)\n\nWhite(guglielma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Brina is colonic. Rianon is energizing. Siobhan is rigid. Jerrold is colonic. If Brina is colonic then Brina is rigid. Rianon is not smart.", "logic": "\nColonic(brina)\nEnergizing(rianon)\nRigid(siobhan)\nColonic(jerrold)\nColonic(brina) -> Rigid(brina)\n\nnot Smart(rianon)\n\nnot Smart(rianon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Herrick is dirty. Rockwell is implanted. Gena is intoxicant. Caitrin is dirty. If Herrick is dirty then Herrick is intoxicant. Gena is quiet.", "logic": "\nDirty(herrick)\nImplanted(rockwell)\nIntoxicant(gena)\nDirty(caitrin)\nDirty(herrick) -> Intoxicant(herrick)\n\nQuiet(gena)\n\nQuiet(gena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1943"} {"premises": "Blythe is relevant. Mikael is not relevant. Mikael is not categorial. All grassy things are apraxic. All grassy, opencut things are not dampish. If something is apraxic and relevant then it is grassy. All apraxic things are opencut. If Blythe is relevant then Blythe is apraxic. If something is grassy and not dampish then it is categorial. If something is categorial and not relevant then it is unsleeping. If something is relevant then it is not unsleeping. Mikael is not relevant.", "logic": "\nRelevant(blythe)\nnot Relevant(mikael)\nnot Categorial(mikael)\nforall x (Grassy(x) -> Apraxic(x))\nforall x (Grassy(x) and Opencut(x) -> not Dampish(x))\nforall x (Apraxic(x) and Relevant(x) -> Grassy(x))\nforall x (Apraxic(x) -> Opencut(x))\nRelevant(blythe) -> Apraxic(blythe)\nforall x (Grassy(x) and not Dampish(x) -> Categorial(x))\nforall x (Categorial(x) and not Relevant(x) -> Unsleeping(x))\nforall x (Relevant(x) -> not Unsleeping(x))\n\nnot Relevant(mikael)\n\ntherefore not Relevant(mikael)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Amory is oversize. Linn is not oversize. Linn is not fanatic. All side things are german. All side, toothed things are not above. If something is german and oversize then it is side. All german things are toothed. If Amory is oversize then Amory is german. If something is side and not above then it is fanatic. If something is fanatic and not oversize then it is baffling. If something is oversize then it is not baffling. Linn is fanatic.", "logic": "\nOversize(amory)\nnot Oversize(linn)\nnot Fanatic(linn)\nforall x (Side(x) -> German(x))\nforall x (Side(x) and Toothed(x) -> not Above(x))\nforall x (German(x) and Oversize(x) -> Side(x))\nforall x (German(x) -> Toothed(x))\nOversize(amory) -> German(amory)\nforall x (Side(x) and not Above(x) -> Fanatic(x))\nforall x (Fanatic(x) and not Oversize(x) -> Baffling(x))\nforall x (Oversize(x) -> not Baffling(x))\n\nFanatic(linn)\n\ntherefore not Fanatic(linn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Veronica is bindable. Grier is not bindable. Grier is not norwegian. All healthful things are allogeneic. All healthful, dispensed things are not autocratic. If something is allogeneic and bindable then it is healthful. All allogeneic things are dispensed. If Veronica is bindable then Veronica is allogeneic. If something is healthful and not autocratic then it is norwegian. If something is norwegian and not bindable then it is anurous. If something is bindable then it is not anurous. Veronica is allogeneic.", "logic": "\nBindable(veronica)\nnot Bindable(grier)\nnot Norwegian(grier)\nforall x (Healthful(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Healthful(x) and Dispensed(x) -> not Autocratic(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) and Bindable(x) -> Healthful(x))\nforall x (Allogeneic(x) -> Dispensed(x))\nBindable(veronica) -> Allogeneic(veronica)\nforall x (Healthful(x) and not Autocratic(x) -> Norwegian(x))\nforall x (Norwegian(x) and not Bindable(x) -> Anurous(x))\nforall x (Bindable(x) -> not Anurous(x))\n\nAllogeneic(veronica)\n\nBindable(veronica) and Bindable(veronica) -> Allogeneic(veronica) -> therefore Allogeneic(veronica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Dyann is saclike. Charil is not saclike. Charil is not miscible. All ribald things are archival. All ribald, gushing things are not unpaved. If something is archival and saclike then it is ribald. All archival things are gushing. If Dyann is saclike then Dyann is archival. If something is ribald and not unpaved then it is miscible. If something is miscible and not saclike then it is hinder. If something is saclike then it is not hinder. Dyann is hinder.", "logic": "\nSaclike(dyann)\nnot Saclike(charil)\nnot Miscible(charil)\nforall x (Ribald(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Ribald(x) and Gushing(x) -> not Unpaved(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) and Saclike(x) -> Ribald(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) -> Gushing(x))\nSaclike(dyann) -> Archival(dyann)\nforall x (Ribald(x) and not Unpaved(x) -> Miscible(x))\nforall x (Miscible(x) and not Saclike(x) -> Hinder(x))\nforall x (Saclike(x) -> not Hinder(x))\n\nHinder(dyann)\n\nSaclike(dyann) and forall x (Saclike(x) -> not Hinder(x)) -> therefore not Hinder(dyann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Sharleen is astounding. Nyssa is not astounding. Nyssa is not haywire. All diachronic things are abranchial. All diachronic, unendowed things are not ascendable. If something is abranchial and astounding then it is diachronic. All abranchial things are unendowed. If Sharleen is astounding then Sharleen is abranchial. If something is diachronic and not ascendable then it is haywire. If something is haywire and not astounding then it is mangled. If something is astounding then it is not mangled. Sharleen is diachronic.", "logic": "\nAstounding(sharleen)\nnot Astounding(nyssa)\nnot Haywire(nyssa)\nforall x (Diachronic(x) -> Abranchial(x))\nforall x (Diachronic(x) and Unendowed(x) -> not Ascendable(x))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) and Astounding(x) -> Diachronic(x))\nforall x (Abranchial(x) -> Unendowed(x))\nAstounding(sharleen) -> Abranchial(sharleen)\nforall x (Diachronic(x) and not Ascendable(x) -> Haywire(x))\nforall x (Haywire(x) and not Astounding(x) -> Mangled(x))\nforall x (Astounding(x) -> not Mangled(x))\n\nDiachronic(sharleen)\n\nAstounding(sharleen) and Astounding(sharleen) -> Abranchial(sharleen) -> therefore Abranchial(sharleen) Abranchial(sharleen) and Astounding(sharleen) and forall x (Abranchial(x) and Astounding(x) -> Diachronic(x)) -> therefore Diachronic(sharleen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Shay is brackish. Amargo is not brackish. Amargo is not suggestive. All biographic things are darned. All biographic, venturous things are not stealthy. If something is darned and brackish then it is biographic. All darned things are venturous. If Shay is brackish then Shay is darned. If something is biographic and not stealthy then it is suggestive. If something is suggestive and not brackish then it is splendid. If something is brackish then it is not splendid. Shay is not venturous.", "logic": "\nBrackish(shay)\nnot Brackish(amargo)\nnot Suggestive(amargo)\nforall x (Biographic(x) -> Darned(x))\nforall x (Biographic(x) and Venturous(x) -> not Stealthy(x))\nforall x (Darned(x) and Brackish(x) -> Biographic(x))\nforall x (Darned(x) -> Venturous(x))\nBrackish(shay) -> Darned(shay)\nforall x (Biographic(x) and not Stealthy(x) -> Suggestive(x))\nforall x (Suggestive(x) and not Brackish(x) -> Splendid(x))\nforall x (Brackish(x) -> not Splendid(x))\n\nnot Venturous(shay)\n\nBrackish(shay) and Brackish(shay) -> Darned(shay) -> therefore Darned(shay) Darned(shay) and forall x (Darned(x) -> Venturous(x)) -> therefore Venturous(shay)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Horace is tasselled. Janeen is not tasselled. Janeen is not bygone. All minimum things are prefrontal. All minimum, radiopaque things are not coniferous. If something is prefrontal and tasselled then it is minimum. All prefrontal things are radiopaque. If Horace is tasselled then Horace is prefrontal. If something is minimum and not coniferous then it is bygone. If something is bygone and not tasselled then it is appalling. If something is tasselled then it is not appalling. Horace is not coniferous.", "logic": "\nTasselled(horace)\nnot Tasselled(janeen)\nnot Bygone(janeen)\nforall x (Minimum(x) -> Prefrontal(x))\nforall x (Minimum(x) and Radiopaque(x) -> not Coniferous(x))\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) and Tasselled(x) -> Minimum(x))\nforall x (Prefrontal(x) -> Radiopaque(x))\nTasselled(horace) -> Prefrontal(horace)\nforall x (Minimum(x) and not Coniferous(x) -> Bygone(x))\nforall x (Bygone(x) and not Tasselled(x) -> Appalling(x))\nforall x (Tasselled(x) -> not Appalling(x))\n\nnot Coniferous(horace)\n\nTasselled(horace) and Tasselled(horace) -> Prefrontal(horace) -> therefore Prefrontal(horace) Prefrontal(horace) and Tasselled(horace) and forall x (Prefrontal(x) and Tasselled(x) -> Minimum(x)) -> therefore Minimum(horace) Tasselled(horace) and Tasselled(horace) -> Prefrontal(horace) -> therefore Prefrontal(horace) Prefrontal(horace) and forall x (Prefrontal(x) -> Radiopaque(x)) -> therefore Radiopaque(horace) Minimum(horace) and Radiopaque(horace) and forall x (Minimum(x) and Radiopaque(x) -> not Coniferous(x)) -> therefore not Coniferous(horace)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Aubert is meddling. Myriam is not meddling. Myriam is not quantal. All robotic things are archival. All robotic, appendant things are not foetal. If something is archival and meddling then it is robotic. All archival things are appendant. If Aubert is meddling then Aubert is archival. If something is robotic and not foetal then it is quantal. If something is quantal and not meddling then it is saltish. If something is meddling then it is not saltish. Aubert is foetal.", "logic": "\nMeddling(aubert)\nnot Meddling(myriam)\nnot Quantal(myriam)\nforall x (Robotic(x) -> Archival(x))\nforall x (Robotic(x) and Appendant(x) -> not Foetal(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) and Meddling(x) -> Robotic(x))\nforall x (Archival(x) -> Appendant(x))\nMeddling(aubert) -> Archival(aubert)\nforall x (Robotic(x) and not Foetal(x) -> Quantal(x))\nforall x (Quantal(x) and not Meddling(x) -> Saltish(x))\nforall x (Meddling(x) -> not Saltish(x))\n\nFoetal(aubert)\n\nMeddling(aubert) and Meddling(aubert) -> Archival(aubert) -> therefore Archival(aubert) Archival(aubert) and Meddling(aubert) and forall x (Archival(x) and Meddling(x) -> Robotic(x)) -> therefore Robotic(aubert) Meddling(aubert) and Meddling(aubert) -> Archival(aubert) -> therefore Archival(aubert) Archival(aubert) and forall x (Archival(x) -> Appendant(x)) -> therefore Appendant(aubert) Robotic(aubert) and Appendant(aubert) and forall x (Robotic(x) and Appendant(x) -> not Foetal(x)) -> therefore not Foetal(aubert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Nerta is coaxial. Carolynn is not coaxial. Carolynn is not boytrose. All setaceous things are aflutter. All setaceous, unframed things are not dangerous. If something is aflutter and coaxial then it is setaceous. All aflutter things are unframed. If Nerta is coaxial then Nerta is aflutter. If something is setaceous and not dangerous then it is boytrose. If something is boytrose and not coaxial then it is sweet. If something is coaxial then it is not sweet. Carolynn is not unframed.", "logic": "\nCoaxial(nerta)\nnot Coaxial(carolynn)\nnot Boytrose(carolynn)\nforall x (Setaceous(x) -> Aflutter(x))\nforall x (Setaceous(x) and Unframed(x) -> not Dangerous(x))\nforall x (Aflutter(x) and Coaxial(x) -> Setaceous(x))\nforall x (Aflutter(x) -> Unframed(x))\nCoaxial(nerta) -> Aflutter(nerta)\nforall x (Setaceous(x) and not Dangerous(x) -> Boytrose(x))\nforall x (Boytrose(x) and not Coaxial(x) -> Sweet(x))\nforall x (Coaxial(x) -> not Sweet(x))\n\nnot Unframed(carolynn)\n\nforall x (Aflutter(x) -> Unframed(x)) <- forall x (Setaceous(x) -> Aflutter(x)) <- forall x (Aflutter(x) and Coaxial(x) -> Setaceous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Davine is zionist. Aphrodite is not zionist. Aphrodite is not budgetary. All deviate things are unfree. All deviate, departed things are not cowardly. If something is unfree and zionist then it is deviate. All unfree things are departed. If Davine is zionist then Davine is unfree. If something is deviate and not cowardly then it is budgetary. If something is budgetary and not zionist then it is persian. If something is zionist then it is not persian. Aphrodite is deviate.", "logic": "\nZionist(davine)\nnot Zionist(aphrodite)\nnot Budgetary(aphrodite)\nforall x (Deviate(x) -> Unfree(x))\nforall x (Deviate(x) and Departed(x) -> not Cowardly(x))\nforall x (Unfree(x) and Zionist(x) -> Deviate(x))\nforall x (Unfree(x) -> Departed(x))\nZionist(davine) -> Unfree(davine)\nforall x (Deviate(x) and not Cowardly(x) -> Budgetary(x))\nforall x (Budgetary(x) and not Zionist(x) -> Persian(x))\nforall x (Zionist(x) -> not Persian(x))\n\nDeviate(aphrodite)\n\nforall x (Unfree(x) and Zionist(x) -> Deviate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Penn is multilevel. Kati is not multilevel. Kati is not regimented. All viewless things are effaceable. All viewless, pubertal things are not lentiform. If something is effaceable and multilevel then it is viewless. All effaceable things are pubertal. If Penn is multilevel then Penn is effaceable. If something is viewless and not lentiform then it is regimented. If something is regimented and not multilevel then it is debonaire. If something is multilevel then it is not debonaire. Kati is not debonaire.", "logic": "\nMultilevel(penn)\nnot Multilevel(kati)\nnot Regimented(kati)\nforall x (Viewless(x) -> Effaceable(x))\nforall x (Viewless(x) and Pubertal(x) -> not Lentiform(x))\nforall x (Effaceable(x) and Multilevel(x) -> Viewless(x))\nforall x (Effaceable(x) -> Pubertal(x))\nMultilevel(penn) -> Effaceable(penn)\nforall x (Viewless(x) and not Lentiform(x) -> Regimented(x))\nforall x (Regimented(x) and not Multilevel(x) -> Debonaire(x))\nforall x (Multilevel(x) -> not Debonaire(x))\n\nnot Debonaire(kati)\n\nforall x (Regimented(x) and not Multilevel(x) -> Debonaire(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "Sayres is strident. Baron is not strident. Baron is not unsleeping. All paralyzed things are unequipped. All paralyzed, butch things are not sinister. If something is unequipped and strident then it is paralyzed. All unequipped things are butch. If Sayres is strident then Sayres is unequipped. If something is paralyzed and not sinister then it is unsleeping. If something is unsleeping and not strident then it is headless. If something is strident then it is not headless. Baron is unequipped.", "logic": "\nStrident(sayres)\nnot Strident(baron)\nnot Unsleeping(baron)\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) and Butch(x) -> not Sinister(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) and Strident(x) -> Paralyzed(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Butch(x))\nStrident(sayres) -> Unequipped(sayres)\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) and not Sinister(x) -> Unsleeping(x))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) and not Strident(x) -> Headless(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) -> not Headless(x))\n\nUnequipped(baron)\n\nforall x (Paralyzed(x) -> Unequipped(x)) <- forall x (Unequipped(x) and Strident(x) -> Paralyzed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1076"} {"premises": "The thain queen the joey. The thain is vegetive. The thain is sonant. The thain diagnose the joey. The thain diagnose the lib. The joey is thornless. The joey vocalise the thain. The lib queen the thain. The lib vocalise the adrianne. The adrianne is sonant. The adrianne is myeloid. The adrianne vocalise the joey. If something diagnose the lib then the lib is sonant. If something diagnose the lib and it diagnose the thain then it vocalise the adrianne. If something diagnose the lib then the lib queen the adrianne. If something diagnose the adrianne and the adrianne is sonant then it vocalise the thain. If something vocalise the thain and the thain vocalise the joey then it is myeloid. If something is thornless and it vocalise the lib then it is myeloid. The adrianne vocalise the joey.", "logic": "\nQueen(thain, joey)\nVegetive(thain)\nSonant(thain)\nDiagnose(thain, joey)\nDiagnose(thain, lib)\nThornless(joey)\nVocalise(joey, thain)\nQueen(lib, thain)\nVocalise(lib, adrianne)\nSonant(adrianne)\nMyeloid(adrianne)\nVocalise(adrianne, joey)\nforall x (Diagnose(x, lib) -> Sonant(lib))\nforall x (Diagnose(x, lib) and Diagnose(x, thain) -> Vocalise(x, adrianne))\nforall x (Diagnose(x, lib) -> Queen(lib, adrianne))\nforall x (Diagnose(x, adrianne) and Sonant(adrianne) -> Vocalise(x, thain))\nforall x (Vocalise(x, thain) and Vocalise(thain, joey) -> Myeloid(x))\nforall x (Thornless(x) and Vocalise(x, lib) -> Myeloid(x))\n\nVocalise(adrianne, joey)\n\ntherefore Vocalise(adrianne, joey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1668"} {"premises": "The raleigh bawl the chaim. The raleigh is zionist. The raleigh is expositive. The raleigh disturb the chaim. The raleigh disturb the janeta. The chaim is earthborn. The chaim comment the raleigh. The janeta bawl the raleigh. The janeta comment the anita. The anita is expositive. The anita is unbuttoned. The anita comment the chaim. If something disturb the janeta then the janeta is expositive. If something disturb the janeta and it disturb the raleigh then it comment the anita. If something disturb the janeta then the janeta bawl the anita. If something disturb the anita and the anita is expositive then it comment the raleigh. If something comment the raleigh and the raleigh comment the chaim then it is unbuttoned. If something is earthborn and it comment the janeta then it is unbuttoned. The raleigh is not zionist.", "logic": "\nBawl(raleigh, chaim)\nZionist(raleigh)\nExpositive(raleigh)\nDisturb(raleigh, chaim)\nDisturb(raleigh, janeta)\nEarthborn(chaim)\nComment(chaim, raleigh)\nBawl(janeta, raleigh)\nComment(janeta, anita)\nExpositive(anita)\nUnbuttoned(anita)\nComment(anita, chaim)\nforall x (Disturb(x, janeta) -> Expositive(janeta))\nforall x (Disturb(x, janeta) and Disturb(x, raleigh) -> Comment(x, anita))\nforall x (Disturb(x, janeta) -> Bawl(janeta, anita))\nforall x (Disturb(x, anita) and Expositive(anita) -> Comment(x, raleigh))\nforall x (Comment(x, raleigh) and Comment(raleigh, chaim) -> Unbuttoned(x))\nforall x (Earthborn(x) and Comment(x, janeta) -> Unbuttoned(x))\n\nnot Zionist(raleigh)\n\ntherefore Zionist(raleigh)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1668"} {"premises": "The sanson startle the lurette. The sanson is aerial. The sanson is tiered. The sanson opalise the lurette. The sanson opalise the orville. The lurette is namibian. The lurette burp the sanson. The orville startle the sanson. The orville burp the ludvig. The ludvig is tiered. The ludvig is cosmetic. The ludvig burp the lurette. If something opalise the orville then the orville is tiered. If something opalise the orville and it opalise the sanson then it burp the ludvig. If something opalise the orville then the orville startle the ludvig. If something opalise the ludvig and the ludvig is tiered then it burp the sanson. If something burp the sanson and the sanson burp the lurette then it is cosmetic. If something is namibian and it burp the orville then it is cosmetic. The ludvig does not visit the sanson.", "logic": "\nStartle(sanson, lurette)\nAerial(sanson)\nTiered(sanson)\nOpalise(sanson, lurette)\nOpalise(sanson, orville)\nNamibian(lurette)\nBurp(lurette, sanson)\nStartle(orville, sanson)\nBurp(orville, ludvig)\nTiered(ludvig)\nCosmetic(ludvig)\nBurp(ludvig, lurette)\nforall x (Opalise(x, orville) -> Tiered(orville))\nforall x (Opalise(x, orville) and Opalise(x, sanson) -> Burp(x, ludvig))\nforall x (Opalise(x, orville) -> Startle(orville, ludvig))\nforall x (Opalise(x, ludvig) and Tiered(ludvig) -> Burp(x, sanson))\nforall x (Burp(x, sanson) and Burp(sanson, lurette) -> Cosmetic(x))\nforall x (Namibian(x) and Burp(x, orville) -> Cosmetic(x))\n\nnot Burp(ludvig, sanson)\n\nforall x (Opalise(x, ludvig) and Tiered(ludvig) -> Burp(x, sanson)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1668"} {"premises": "The valencia slick the randie. The valencia is iniquitous. The valencia is myocardial. The valencia smell the randie. The valencia smell the merci. The randie is costive. The randie cast the valencia. The merci slick the valencia. The merci cast the aloysia. The aloysia is myocardial. The aloysia is slashed. The aloysia cast the randie. If something smell the merci then the merci is myocardial. If something smell the merci and it smell the valencia then it cast the aloysia. If something smell the merci then the merci slick the aloysia. If something smell the aloysia and the aloysia is myocardial then it cast the valencia. If something cast the valencia and the valencia cast the randie then it is slashed. If something is costive and it cast the merci then it is slashed. The randie smell the aloysia.", "logic": "\nSlick(valencia, randie)\nIniquitous(valencia)\nMyocardial(valencia)\nSmell(valencia, randie)\nSmell(valencia, merci)\nCostive(randie)\nCast(randie, valencia)\nSlick(merci, valencia)\nCast(merci, aloysia)\nMyocardial(aloysia)\nSlashed(aloysia)\nCast(aloysia, randie)\nforall x (Smell(x, merci) -> Myocardial(merci))\nforall x (Smell(x, merci) and Smell(x, valencia) -> Cast(x, aloysia))\nforall x (Smell(x, merci) -> Slick(merci, aloysia))\nforall x (Smell(x, aloysia) and Myocardial(aloysia) -> Cast(x, valencia))\nforall x (Cast(x, valencia) and Cast(valencia, randie) -> Slashed(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) and Cast(x, merci) -> Slashed(x))\n\nSmell(randie, aloysia)\n\nSmell(randie, aloysia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-1668"} {"premises": "Jakob is mesial. Jakob is senecan. Jakob is many. Jakob is unfitting. Frieda is ascetical. Frieda is catty. Arlie is unfitting. Arlie is catty. Amory is gossamer. Amory is catty. If Jakob is gossamer then Jakob is not catty. If Jakob is mesial and Jakob is senecan then Jakob is ascetical. Furry, catty things are gossamer. Blue, ascetical things are gossamer. If something is many and gossamer then it is senecan. All senecan, ascetical things are mesial. If Amory is gossamer then Amory is not many. If Arlie is not many then Arlie is mesial. Amory is catty.", "logic": "\nMesial(jakob)\nSenecan(jakob)\nMany(jakob)\nUnfitting(jakob)\nAscetical(frieda)\nCatty(frieda)\nUnfitting(arlie)\nCatty(arlie)\nGossamer(amory)\nCatty(amory)\nGossamer(jakob) -> not Catty(jakob)\nMesial(jakob) and Senecan(jakob) -> Ascetical(jakob)\nforall x (Senecan(x) and Catty(x) -> Gossamer(x))\nforall x (Mesial(x) and Ascetical(x) -> Gossamer(x))\nforall x (Many(x) and Gossamer(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Senecan(x) and Ascetical(x) -> Mesial(x))\nGossamer(amory) -> not Many(amory)\nnot Many(arlie) -> Mesial(arlie)\n\nCatty(amory)\n\ntherefore Catty(amory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Nata is confiding. Nata is imperfect. Nata is venose. Nata is prescribed. Jasmina is crowing. Jasmina is laborious. Brigitte is prescribed. Brigitte is laborious. Marina is tenth. Marina is laborious. If Nata is tenth then Nata is not laborious. If Nata is confiding and Nata is imperfect then Nata is crowing. Furry, laborious things are tenth. Blue, crowing things are tenth. If something is venose and tenth then it is imperfect. All imperfect, crowing things are confiding. If Marina is tenth then Marina is not venose. If Brigitte is not venose then Brigitte is confiding. Nata is not prescribed.", "logic": "\nConfiding(nata)\nImperfect(nata)\nVenose(nata)\nPrescribed(nata)\nCrowing(jasmina)\nLaborious(jasmina)\nPrescribed(brigitte)\nLaborious(brigitte)\nTenth(marina)\nLaborious(marina)\nTenth(nata) -> not Laborious(nata)\nConfiding(nata) and Imperfect(nata) -> Crowing(nata)\nforall x (Imperfect(x) and Laborious(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Confiding(x) and Crowing(x) -> Tenth(x))\nforall x (Venose(x) and Tenth(x) -> Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Imperfect(x) and Crowing(x) -> Confiding(x))\nTenth(marina) -> not Venose(marina)\nnot Venose(brigitte) -> Confiding(brigitte)\n\nnot Prescribed(nata)\n\ntherefore Prescribed(nata)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Gracia is beaming. Gracia is culinary. Gracia is laic. Gracia is beardless. Darryl is nonstop. Darryl is anuretic. Katharine is beardless. Katharine is anuretic. Rafaelita is seasoned. Rafaelita is anuretic. If Gracia is seasoned then Gracia is not anuretic. If Gracia is beaming and Gracia is culinary then Gracia is nonstop. Furry, anuretic things are seasoned. Blue, nonstop things are seasoned. If something is laic and seasoned then it is culinary. All culinary, nonstop things are beaming. If Rafaelita is seasoned then Rafaelita is not laic. If Katharine is not laic then Katharine is beaming. Gracia is nonstop.", "logic": "\nBeaming(gracia)\nCulinary(gracia)\nLaic(gracia)\nBeardless(gracia)\nNonstop(darryl)\nAnuretic(darryl)\nBeardless(katharine)\nAnuretic(katharine)\nSeasoned(rafaelita)\nAnuretic(rafaelita)\nSeasoned(gracia) -> not Anuretic(gracia)\nBeaming(gracia) and Culinary(gracia) -> Nonstop(gracia)\nforall x (Culinary(x) and Anuretic(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Beaming(x) and Nonstop(x) -> Seasoned(x))\nforall x (Laic(x) and Seasoned(x) -> Culinary(x))\nforall x (Culinary(x) and Nonstop(x) -> Beaming(x))\nSeasoned(rafaelita) -> not Laic(rafaelita)\nnot Laic(katharine) -> Beaming(katharine)\n\nNonstop(gracia)\n\nBeaming(gracia) and Culinary(gracia) and Beaming(gracia) and Culinary(gracia) -> Nonstop(gracia) -> therefore Nonstop(gracia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Morgan is unmilitary. Morgan is hoofed. Morgan is minuscular. Morgan is hardheaded. Alana is frizzy. Alana is parthian. Jan is hardheaded. Jan is parthian. Gretna is pectineal. Gretna is parthian. If Morgan is pectineal then Morgan is not parthian. If Morgan is unmilitary and Morgan is hoofed then Morgan is frizzy. Furry, parthian things are pectineal. Blue, frizzy things are pectineal. If something is minuscular and pectineal then it is hoofed. All hoofed, frizzy things are unmilitary. If Gretna is pectineal then Gretna is not minuscular. If Jan is not minuscular then Jan is unmilitary. Gretna is minuscular.", "logic": "\nUnmilitary(morgan)\nHoofed(morgan)\nMinuscular(morgan)\nHardheaded(morgan)\nFrizzy(alana)\nParthian(alana)\nHardheaded(jan)\nParthian(jan)\nPectineal(gretna)\nParthian(gretna)\nPectineal(morgan) -> not Parthian(morgan)\nUnmilitary(morgan) and Hoofed(morgan) -> Frizzy(morgan)\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Parthian(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nforall x (Unmilitary(x) and Frizzy(x) -> Pectineal(x))\nforall x (Minuscular(x) and Pectineal(x) -> Hoofed(x))\nforall x (Hoofed(x) and Frizzy(x) -> Unmilitary(x))\nPectineal(gretna) -> not Minuscular(gretna)\nnot Minuscular(jan) -> Unmilitary(jan)\n\nMinuscular(gretna)\n\nPectineal(gretna) and Pectineal(gretna) -> not Minuscular(gretna) -> therefore not Minuscular(gretna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Cordelia is extreme. Cordelia is avid. Cordelia is advisable. Cordelia is accurst. Darwin is master. Darwin is downlike. Molly is accurst. Molly is downlike. Kimmi is concise. Kimmi is downlike. If Cordelia is concise then Cordelia is not downlike. If Cordelia is extreme and Cordelia is avid then Cordelia is master. Furry, downlike things are concise. Blue, master things are concise. If something is advisable and concise then it is avid. All avid, master things are extreme. If Kimmi is concise then Kimmi is not advisable. If Molly is not advisable then Molly is extreme. Cordelia is concise.", "logic": "\nExtreme(cordelia)\nAvid(cordelia)\nAdvisable(cordelia)\nAccurst(cordelia)\nMaster(darwin)\nDownlike(darwin)\nAccurst(molly)\nDownlike(molly)\nConcise(kimmi)\nDownlike(kimmi)\nConcise(cordelia) -> not Downlike(cordelia)\nExtreme(cordelia) and Avid(cordelia) -> Master(cordelia)\nforall x (Avid(x) and Downlike(x) -> Concise(x))\nforall x (Extreme(x) and Master(x) -> Concise(x))\nforall x (Advisable(x) and Concise(x) -> Avid(x))\nforall x (Avid(x) and Master(x) -> Extreme(x))\nConcise(kimmi) -> not Advisable(kimmi)\nnot Advisable(molly) -> Extreme(molly)\n\nConcise(cordelia)\n\nExtreme(cordelia) and Avid(cordelia) and Extreme(cordelia) and Avid(cordelia) -> Master(cordelia) -> therefore Master(cordelia) Extreme(cordelia) and Master(cordelia) and forall x (Extreme(x) and Master(x) -> Concise(x)) -> therefore Concise(cordelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Dorris is eager. Dorris is iridescent. Dorris is inner. Dorris is veined. Friedrick is scalelike. Friedrick is excessive. Jolene is veined. Jolene is excessive. Alyda is unstarred. Alyda is excessive. If Dorris is unstarred then Dorris is not excessive. If Dorris is eager and Dorris is iridescent then Dorris is scalelike. Furry, excessive things are unstarred. Blue, scalelike things are unstarred. If something is inner and unstarred then it is iridescent. All iridescent, scalelike things are eager. If Alyda is unstarred then Alyda is not inner. If Jolene is not inner then Jolene is eager. Dorris is not unstarred.", "logic": "\nEager(dorris)\nIridescent(dorris)\nInner(dorris)\nVeined(dorris)\nScalelike(friedrick)\nExcessive(friedrick)\nVeined(jolene)\nExcessive(jolene)\nUnstarred(alyda)\nExcessive(alyda)\nUnstarred(dorris) -> not Excessive(dorris)\nEager(dorris) and Iridescent(dorris) -> Scalelike(dorris)\nforall x (Iridescent(x) and Excessive(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Eager(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Unstarred(x))\nforall x (Inner(x) and Unstarred(x) -> Iridescent(x))\nforall x (Iridescent(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Eager(x))\nUnstarred(alyda) -> not Inner(alyda)\nnot Inner(jolene) -> Eager(jolene)\n\nnot Unstarred(dorris)\n\nEager(dorris) and Iridescent(dorris) and Eager(dorris) and Iridescent(dorris) -> Scalelike(dorris) -> therefore Scalelike(dorris) Eager(dorris) and Scalelike(dorris) and forall x (Eager(x) and Scalelike(x) -> Unstarred(x)) -> therefore Unstarred(dorris)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Reed is drupaceous. Reed is simple. Reed is vedic. Reed is bolshevist. Merrily is twin. Merrily is nutritive. Mayda is bolshevist. Mayda is nutritive. Tamar is hindustani. Tamar is nutritive. If Reed is hindustani then Reed is not nutritive. If Reed is drupaceous and Reed is simple then Reed is twin. Furry, nutritive things are hindustani. Blue, twin things are hindustani. If something is vedic and hindustani then it is simple. All simple, twin things are drupaceous. If Tamar is hindustani then Tamar is not vedic. If Mayda is not vedic then Mayda is drupaceous. Reed is not nutritive.", "logic": "\nDrupaceous(reed)\nSimple(reed)\nVedic(reed)\nBolshevist(reed)\nTwin(merrily)\nNutritive(merrily)\nBolshevist(mayda)\nNutritive(mayda)\nHindustani(tamar)\nNutritive(tamar)\nHindustani(reed) -> not Nutritive(reed)\nDrupaceous(reed) and Simple(reed) -> Twin(reed)\nforall x (Simple(x) and Nutritive(x) -> Hindustani(x))\nforall x (Drupaceous(x) and Twin(x) -> Hindustani(x))\nforall x (Vedic(x) and Hindustani(x) -> Simple(x))\nforall x (Simple(x) and Twin(x) -> Drupaceous(x))\nHindustani(tamar) -> not Vedic(tamar)\nnot Vedic(mayda) -> Drupaceous(mayda)\n\nnot Nutritive(reed)\n\nDrupaceous(reed) and Simple(reed) and Drupaceous(reed) and Simple(reed) -> Twin(reed) -> therefore Twin(reed) Drupaceous(reed) and Twin(reed) and forall x (Drupaceous(x) and Twin(x) -> Hindustani(x)) -> therefore Hindustani(reed) Hindustani(reed) and Hindustani(reed) -> not Nutritive(reed) -> therefore not Nutritive(reed)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Chelsie is arborical. Chelsie is authorial. Chelsie is seasick. Chelsie is nettled. Sena is punk. Sena is private. Standford is nettled. Standford is private. Celestia is coming. Celestia is private. If Chelsie is coming then Chelsie is not private. If Chelsie is arborical and Chelsie is authorial then Chelsie is punk. Furry, private things are coming. Blue, punk things are coming. If something is seasick and coming then it is authorial. All authorial, punk things are arborical. If Celestia is coming then Celestia is not seasick. If Standford is not seasick then Standford is arborical. Chelsie is private.", "logic": "\nArborical(chelsie)\nAuthorial(chelsie)\nSeasick(chelsie)\nNettled(chelsie)\nPunk(sena)\nPrivate(sena)\nNettled(standford)\nPrivate(standford)\nComing(celestia)\nPrivate(celestia)\nComing(chelsie) -> not Private(chelsie)\nArborical(chelsie) and Authorial(chelsie) -> Punk(chelsie)\nforall x (Authorial(x) and Private(x) -> Coming(x))\nforall x (Arborical(x) and Punk(x) -> Coming(x))\nforall x (Seasick(x) and Coming(x) -> Authorial(x))\nforall x (Authorial(x) and Punk(x) -> Arborical(x))\nComing(celestia) -> not Seasick(celestia)\nnot Seasick(standford) -> Arborical(standford)\n\nPrivate(chelsie)\n\nArborical(chelsie) and Authorial(chelsie) and Arborical(chelsie) and Authorial(chelsie) -> Punk(chelsie) -> therefore Punk(chelsie) Arborical(chelsie) and Punk(chelsie) and forall x (Arborical(x) and Punk(x) -> Coming(x)) -> therefore Coming(chelsie) Coming(chelsie) and Coming(chelsie) -> not Private(chelsie) -> therefore not Private(chelsie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Sapphire is adventive. Sapphire is steadying. Sapphire is worth. Sapphire is homesick. Tulley is accoutered. Tulley is corpulent. Hollyanne is homesick. Hollyanne is corpulent. Trix is allogeneic. Trix is corpulent. If Sapphire is allogeneic then Sapphire is not corpulent. If Sapphire is adventive and Sapphire is steadying then Sapphire is accoutered. Furry, corpulent things are allogeneic. Blue, accoutered things are allogeneic. If something is worth and allogeneic then it is steadying. All steadying, accoutered things are adventive. If Trix is allogeneic then Trix is not worth. If Hollyanne is not worth then Hollyanne is adventive. Tulley is not allogeneic.", "logic": "\nAdventive(sapphire)\nSteadying(sapphire)\nWorth(sapphire)\nHomesick(sapphire)\nAccoutered(tulley)\nCorpulent(tulley)\nHomesick(hollyanne)\nCorpulent(hollyanne)\nAllogeneic(trix)\nCorpulent(trix)\nAllogeneic(sapphire) -> not Corpulent(sapphire)\nAdventive(sapphire) and Steadying(sapphire) -> Accoutered(sapphire)\nforall x (Steadying(x) and Corpulent(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Adventive(x) and Accoutered(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nforall x (Worth(x) and Allogeneic(x) -> Steadying(x))\nforall x (Steadying(x) and Accoutered(x) -> Adventive(x))\nAllogeneic(trix) -> not Worth(trix)\nnot Worth(hollyanne) -> Adventive(hollyanne)\n\nnot Allogeneic(tulley)\n\nforall x (Adventive(x) and Accoutered(x) -> Allogeneic(x)) <- forall x (Steadying(x) and Accoutered(x) -> Adventive(x)) <- forall x (Worth(x) and Allogeneic(x) -> Steadying(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Morley is touchy. Morley is nonsexual. Morley is radiopaque. Morley is connective. Carlisle is boundless. Carlisle is faultless. Sara is connective. Sara is faultless. Krystle is base. Krystle is faultless. If Morley is base then Morley is not faultless. If Morley is touchy and Morley is nonsexual then Morley is boundless. Furry, faultless things are base. Blue, boundless things are base. If something is radiopaque and base then it is nonsexual. All nonsexual, boundless things are touchy. If Krystle is base then Krystle is not radiopaque. If Sara is not radiopaque then Sara is touchy. Krystle is nonsexual.", "logic": "\nTouchy(morley)\nNonsexual(morley)\nRadiopaque(morley)\nConnective(morley)\nBoundless(carlisle)\nFaultless(carlisle)\nConnective(sara)\nFaultless(sara)\nBase(krystle)\nFaultless(krystle)\nBase(morley) -> not Faultless(morley)\nTouchy(morley) and Nonsexual(morley) -> Boundless(morley)\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) and Faultless(x) -> Base(x))\nforall x (Touchy(x) and Boundless(x) -> Base(x))\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) and Base(x) -> Nonsexual(x))\nforall x (Nonsexual(x) and Boundless(x) -> Touchy(x))\nBase(krystle) -> not Radiopaque(krystle)\nnot Radiopaque(sara) -> Touchy(sara)\n\nNonsexual(krystle)\n\nforall x (Radiopaque(x) and Base(x) -> Nonsexual(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Toddie is sizeable. Toddie is medieval. Toddie is condemning. Toddie is attic. Linnet is philatelic. Linnet is nationwide. Aubrey is attic. Aubrey is nationwide. Butler is outermost. Butler is nationwide. If Toddie is outermost then Toddie is not nationwide. If Toddie is sizeable and Toddie is medieval then Toddie is philatelic. Furry, nationwide things are outermost. Blue, philatelic things are outermost. If something is condemning and outermost then it is medieval. All medieval, philatelic things are sizeable. If Butler is outermost then Butler is not condemning. If Aubrey is not condemning then Aubrey is sizeable. Linnet is not sizeable.", "logic": "\nSizeable(toddie)\nMedieval(toddie)\nCondemning(toddie)\nAttic(toddie)\nPhilatelic(linnet)\nNationwide(linnet)\nAttic(aubrey)\nNationwide(aubrey)\nOutermost(butler)\nNationwide(butler)\nOutermost(toddie) -> not Nationwide(toddie)\nSizeable(toddie) and Medieval(toddie) -> Philatelic(toddie)\nforall x (Medieval(x) and Nationwide(x) -> Outermost(x))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Outermost(x))\nforall x (Condemning(x) and Outermost(x) -> Medieval(x))\nforall x (Medieval(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Sizeable(x))\nOutermost(butler) -> not Condemning(butler)\nnot Condemning(aubrey) -> Sizeable(aubrey)\n\nnot Sizeable(linnet)\n\nforall x (Medieval(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Sizeable(x)) <- forall x (Condemning(x) and Outermost(x) -> Medieval(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Doralynn is quelled. Doralynn is healthier. Doralynn is fiberoptic. Doralynn is manageable. Woodrow is objective. Woodrow is acrogenic. Gamaliel is manageable. Gamaliel is acrogenic. Consolata is ecstatic. Consolata is acrogenic. If Doralynn is ecstatic then Doralynn is not acrogenic. If Doralynn is quelled and Doralynn is healthier then Doralynn is objective. Furry, acrogenic things are ecstatic. Blue, objective things are ecstatic. If something is fiberoptic and ecstatic then it is healthier. All healthier, objective things are quelled. If Consolata is ecstatic then Consolata is not fiberoptic. If Gamaliel is not fiberoptic then Gamaliel is quelled. Gamaliel is quelled.", "logic": "\nQuelled(doralynn)\nHealthier(doralynn)\nFiberoptic(doralynn)\nManageable(doralynn)\nObjective(woodrow)\nAcrogenic(woodrow)\nManageable(gamaliel)\nAcrogenic(gamaliel)\nEcstatic(consolata)\nAcrogenic(consolata)\nEcstatic(doralynn) -> not Acrogenic(doralynn)\nQuelled(doralynn) and Healthier(doralynn) -> Objective(doralynn)\nforall x (Healthier(x) and Acrogenic(x) -> Ecstatic(x))\nforall x (Quelled(x) and Objective(x) -> Ecstatic(x))\nforall x (Fiberoptic(x) and Ecstatic(x) -> Healthier(x))\nforall x (Healthier(x) and Objective(x) -> Quelled(x))\nEcstatic(consolata) -> not Fiberoptic(consolata)\nnot Fiberoptic(gamaliel) -> Quelled(gamaliel)\n\nQuelled(gamaliel)\n\nforall x (Healthier(x) and Objective(x) -> Quelled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Myna is homophile. Myna is statutory. Myna is untaxed. Myna is conniving. Bernice is improvised. Bernice is chantlike. Ibrahim is conniving. Ibrahim is chantlike. Sherilyn is saxicolous. Sherilyn is chantlike. If Myna is saxicolous then Myna is not chantlike. If Myna is homophile and Myna is statutory then Myna is improvised. Furry, chantlike things are saxicolous. Blue, improvised things are saxicolous. If something is untaxed and saxicolous then it is statutory. All statutory, improvised things are homophile. If Sherilyn is saxicolous then Sherilyn is not untaxed. If Ibrahim is not untaxed then Ibrahim is homophile. Bernice is not conniving.", "logic": "\nHomophile(myna)\nStatutory(myna)\nUntaxed(myna)\nConniving(myna)\nImprovised(bernice)\nChantlike(bernice)\nConniving(ibrahim)\nChantlike(ibrahim)\nSaxicolous(sherilyn)\nChantlike(sherilyn)\nSaxicolous(myna) -> not Chantlike(myna)\nHomophile(myna) and Statutory(myna) -> Improvised(myna)\nforall x (Statutory(x) and Chantlike(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Homophile(x) and Improvised(x) -> Saxicolous(x))\nforall x (Untaxed(x) and Saxicolous(x) -> Statutory(x))\nforall x (Statutory(x) and Improvised(x) -> Homophile(x))\nSaxicolous(sherilyn) -> not Untaxed(sherilyn)\nnot Untaxed(ibrahim) -> Homophile(ibrahim)\n\nnot Conniving(bernice)\n\nnot Conniving(bernice) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Steffen is neoliberal. Steffen is verified. Steffen is leggy. Steffen is wimpy. Kalina is antonymous. Kalina is fawning. Moshe is wimpy. Moshe is fawning. Bertine is anaclinal. Bertine is fawning. If Steffen is anaclinal then Steffen is not fawning. If Steffen is neoliberal and Steffen is verified then Steffen is antonymous. Furry, fawning things are anaclinal. Blue, antonymous things are anaclinal. If something is leggy and anaclinal then it is verified. All verified, antonymous things are neoliberal. If Bertine is anaclinal then Bertine is not leggy. If Moshe is not leggy then Moshe is neoliberal. Bertine is antonymous.", "logic": "\nNeoliberal(steffen)\nVerified(steffen)\nLeggy(steffen)\nWimpy(steffen)\nAntonymous(kalina)\nFawning(kalina)\nWimpy(moshe)\nFawning(moshe)\nAnaclinal(bertine)\nFawning(bertine)\nAnaclinal(steffen) -> not Fawning(steffen)\nNeoliberal(steffen) and Verified(steffen) -> Antonymous(steffen)\nforall x (Verified(x) and Fawning(x) -> Anaclinal(x))\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) and Antonymous(x) -> Anaclinal(x))\nforall x (Leggy(x) and Anaclinal(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Verified(x) and Antonymous(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nAnaclinal(bertine) -> not Leggy(bertine)\nnot Leggy(moshe) -> Neoliberal(moshe)\n\nAntonymous(bertine)\n\nAntonymous(bertine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Inci is friable. Inci is classified. Inci is worthless. Inci is deboned. Valeria is cancellate. Valeria is minatory. Lorie is deboned. Lorie is minatory. Chase is imposed. Chase is minatory. If Inci is imposed then Inci is not minatory. If Inci is friable and Inci is classified then Inci is cancellate. Furry, minatory things are imposed. Blue, cancellate things are imposed. If something is worthless and imposed then it is classified. All classified, cancellate things are friable. If Chase is imposed then Chase is not worthless. If Lorie is not worthless then Lorie is friable. Chase is not deboned.", "logic": "\nFriable(inci)\nClassified(inci)\nWorthless(inci)\nDeboned(inci)\nCancellate(valeria)\nMinatory(valeria)\nDeboned(lorie)\nMinatory(lorie)\nImposed(chase)\nMinatory(chase)\nImposed(inci) -> not Minatory(inci)\nFriable(inci) and Classified(inci) -> Cancellate(inci)\nforall x (Classified(x) and Minatory(x) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Friable(x) and Cancellate(x) -> Imposed(x))\nforall x (Worthless(x) and Imposed(x) -> Classified(x))\nforall x (Classified(x) and Cancellate(x) -> Friable(x))\nImposed(chase) -> not Worthless(chase)\nnot Worthless(lorie) -> Friable(lorie)\n\nnot Deboned(chase)\n\nnot Deboned(chase) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "Terrye is tops. Terrye is grooved. Terrye is crenulate. Terrye is undecided. Henderson is jawless. Henderson is postnatal. Rainer is undecided. Rainer is postnatal. Love is mesodermal. Love is postnatal. If Terrye is mesodermal then Terrye is not postnatal. If Terrye is tops and Terrye is grooved then Terrye is jawless. Furry, postnatal things are mesodermal. Blue, jawless things are mesodermal. If something is crenulate and mesodermal then it is grooved. All grooved, jawless things are tops. If Love is mesodermal then Love is not crenulate. If Rainer is not crenulate then Rainer is tops. Rainer is jawless.", "logic": "\nTops(terrye)\nGrooved(terrye)\nCrenulate(terrye)\nUndecided(terrye)\nJawless(henderson)\nPostnatal(henderson)\nUndecided(rainer)\nPostnatal(rainer)\nMesodermal(love)\nPostnatal(love)\nMesodermal(terrye) -> not Postnatal(terrye)\nTops(terrye) and Grooved(terrye) -> Jawless(terrye)\nforall x (Grooved(x) and Postnatal(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Tops(x) and Jawless(x) -> Mesodermal(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) and Mesodermal(x) -> Grooved(x))\nforall x (Grooved(x) and Jawless(x) -> Tops(x))\nMesodermal(love) -> not Crenulate(love)\nnot Crenulate(rainer) -> Tops(rainer)\n\nJawless(rainer)\n\nJawless(rainer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1464"} {"premises": "The emmet is detachable. The jacqui rant the dynah. The dynah junket the emmet. If the emmet does not chase the jacqui then the jacqui junket the dynah. If someone rant the jacqui then the jacqui is mendacious. If someone junket the emmet then they see the jacqui. If someone is dipped and not detachable then they are not throbbing. If someone is trig and throbbing then they see the emmet. If someone antique the dynah then they are not trig. The dynah junket the emmet.", "logic": "\nDetachable(emmet)\nRant(jacqui, dynah)\nJunket(dynah, emmet)\nnot Junket(emmet, jacqui) -> Junket(jacqui, dynah)\nforall x (Rant(x, jacqui) -> Mendacious(jacqui))\nforall x (Junket(x, emmet) -> Rant(x, jacqui))\nforall x (Dipped(x) and not Detachable(x) -> not Throbbing(x))\nforall x (Trig(x) and Throbbing(x) -> Rant(x, emmet))\nforall x (Antique(x, dynah) -> not Trig(x))\n\nJunket(dynah, emmet)\n\ntherefore Junket(dynah, emmet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The sinclare is blowzy. The augustina quintuple the marisa. The marisa inactivate the sinclare. If the sinclare does not chase the augustina then the augustina inactivate the marisa. If someone quintuple the augustina then the augustina is covalent. If someone inactivate the sinclare then they see the augustina. If someone is vapourous and not blowzy then they are not vendable. If someone is finespun and vendable then they see the sinclare. If someone mold the marisa then they are not finespun. The marisa does not chase the sinclare.", "logic": "\nBlowzy(sinclare)\nQuintuple(augustina, marisa)\nInactivate(marisa, sinclare)\nnot Inactivate(sinclare, augustina) -> Inactivate(augustina, marisa)\nforall x (Quintuple(x, augustina) -> Covalent(augustina))\nforall x (Inactivate(x, sinclare) -> Quintuple(x, augustina))\nforall x (Vapourous(x) and not Blowzy(x) -> not Vendable(x))\nforall x (Finespun(x) and Vendable(x) -> Quintuple(x, sinclare))\nforall x (Mold(x, marisa) -> not Finespun(x))\n\nnot Inactivate(marisa, sinclare)\n\ntherefore Inactivate(marisa, sinclare)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The neville is grandiose. The jess pardon the grissel. The grissel minimize the neville. If the neville does not chase the jess then the jess minimize the grissel. If someone pardon the jess then the jess is athirst. If someone minimize the neville then they see the jess. If someone is bengali and not grandiose then they are not admittible. If someone is pebbly and admittible then they see the neville. If someone dispose the grissel then they are not pebbly. The grissel pardon the jess.", "logic": "\nGrandiose(neville)\nPardon(jess, grissel)\nMinimize(grissel, neville)\nnot Minimize(neville, jess) -> Minimize(jess, grissel)\nforall x (Pardon(x, jess) -> Athirst(jess))\nforall x (Minimize(x, neville) -> Pardon(x, jess))\nforall x (Bengali(x) and not Grandiose(x) -> not Admittible(x))\nforall x (Pebbly(x) and Admittible(x) -> Pardon(x, neville))\nforall x (Dispose(x, grissel) -> not Pebbly(x))\n\nPardon(grissel, jess)\n\nMinimize(grissel, neville) and forall x (Minimize(x, neville) -> Pardon(x, jess)) -> therefore Pardon(grissel, jess)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The preston is tegular. The shandie club the nydia. The nydia winnow the preston. If the preston does not chase the shandie then the shandie winnow the nydia. If someone club the shandie then the shandie is iridaceous. If someone winnow the preston then they see the shandie. If someone is supperless and not tegular then they are not solomonic. If someone is mythologic and solomonic then they see the preston. If someone scrutinize the nydia then they are not mythologic. The nydia does not see the shandie.", "logic": "\nTegular(preston)\nClub(shandie, nydia)\nWinnow(nydia, preston)\nnot Winnow(preston, shandie) -> Winnow(shandie, nydia)\nforall x (Club(x, shandie) -> Iridaceous(shandie))\nforall x (Winnow(x, preston) -> Club(x, shandie))\nforall x (Supperless(x) and not Tegular(x) -> not Solomonic(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) and Solomonic(x) -> Club(x, preston))\nforall x (Scrutinize(x, nydia) -> not Mythologic(x))\n\nnot Club(nydia, shandie)\n\nWinnow(nydia, preston) and forall x (Winnow(x, preston) -> Club(x, shandie)) -> therefore Club(nydia, shandie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The herschel is homeric. The becki buttweld the verla. The verla acquire the herschel. If the herschel does not chase the becki then the becki acquire the verla. If someone buttweld the becki then the becki is upfield. If someone acquire the herschel then they see the becki. If someone is amebic and not homeric then they are not calendered. If someone is briefless and calendered then they see the herschel. If someone connect the verla then they are not briefless. The becki is upfield.", "logic": "\nHomeric(herschel)\nButtweld(becki, verla)\nAcquire(verla, herschel)\nnot Acquire(herschel, becki) -> Acquire(becki, verla)\nforall x (Buttweld(x, becki) -> Upfield(becki))\nforall x (Acquire(x, herschel) -> Buttweld(x, becki))\nforall x (Amebic(x) and not Homeric(x) -> not Calendered(x))\nforall x (Briefless(x) and Calendered(x) -> Buttweld(x, herschel))\nforall x (Connect(x, verla) -> not Briefless(x))\n\nUpfield(becki)\n\nAcquire(verla, herschel) and forall x (Acquire(x, herschel) -> Buttweld(x, becki)) -> therefore Buttweld(verla, becki) Buttweld(verla, becki) and forall x (Buttweld(x, becki) -> Upfield(becki)) -> therefore Upfield(becki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The mitra is pilous. The annalyse pock the bjorne. The bjorne caracole the mitra. If the mitra does not chase the annalyse then the annalyse caracole the bjorne. If someone pock the annalyse then the annalyse is allylic. If someone caracole the mitra then they see the annalyse. If someone is ratlike and not pilous then they are not median. If someone is swank and median then they see the mitra. If someone favour the bjorne then they are not swank. The annalyse is not allylic.", "logic": "\nPilous(mitra)\nPock(annalyse, bjorne)\nCaracole(bjorne, mitra)\nnot Caracole(mitra, annalyse) -> Caracole(annalyse, bjorne)\nforall x (Pock(x, annalyse) -> Allylic(annalyse))\nforall x (Caracole(x, mitra) -> Pock(x, annalyse))\nforall x (Ratlike(x) and not Pilous(x) -> not Median(x))\nforall x (Swank(x) and Median(x) -> Pock(x, mitra))\nforall x (Favour(x, bjorne) -> not Swank(x))\n\nnot Allylic(annalyse)\n\nCaracole(bjorne, mitra) and forall x (Caracole(x, mitra) -> Pock(x, annalyse)) -> therefore Pock(bjorne, annalyse) Pock(bjorne, annalyse) and forall x (Pock(x, annalyse) -> Allylic(annalyse)) -> therefore Allylic(annalyse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The mignonne is true. The morrie preoccupy the filip. The filip gnash the mignonne. If the mignonne does not chase the morrie then the morrie gnash the filip. If someone preoccupy the morrie then the morrie is propellent. If someone gnash the mignonne then they see the morrie. If someone is tubelike and not true then they are not pupal. If someone is weak and pupal then they see the mignonne. If someone bombinate the filip then they are not weak. The filip does not see the mignonne.", "logic": "\nTrue(mignonne)\nPreoccupy(morrie, filip)\nGnash(filip, mignonne)\nnot Gnash(mignonne, morrie) -> Gnash(morrie, filip)\nforall x (Preoccupy(x, morrie) -> Propellent(morrie))\nforall x (Gnash(x, mignonne) -> Preoccupy(x, morrie))\nforall x (Tubelike(x) and not True(x) -> not Pupal(x))\nforall x (Weak(x) and Pupal(x) -> Preoccupy(x, mignonne))\nforall x (Bombinate(x, filip) -> not Weak(x))\n\nnot Preoccupy(filip, mignonne)\n\nforall x (Weak(x) and Pupal(x) -> Preoccupy(x, mignonne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The valdemar is repugnant. The mandy travel the lyndsie. The lyndsie purse the valdemar. If the valdemar does not chase the mandy then the mandy purse the lyndsie. If someone travel the mandy then the mandy is theban. If someone purse the valdemar then they see the mandy. If someone is documented and not repugnant then they are not blooded. If someone is goethian and blooded then they see the valdemar. If someone subjoin the lyndsie then they are not goethian. The valdemar travel the mandy.", "logic": "\nRepugnant(valdemar)\nTravel(mandy, lyndsie)\nPurse(lyndsie, valdemar)\nnot Purse(valdemar, mandy) -> Purse(mandy, lyndsie)\nforall x (Travel(x, mandy) -> Theban(mandy))\nforall x (Purse(x, valdemar) -> Travel(x, mandy))\nforall x (Documented(x) and not Repugnant(x) -> not Blooded(x))\nforall x (Goethian(x) and Blooded(x) -> Travel(x, valdemar))\nforall x (Subjoin(x, lyndsie) -> not Goethian(x))\n\nTravel(valdemar, mandy)\n\nforall x (Purse(x, valdemar) -> Travel(x, mandy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The floyd is hawkish. The tobie abacinate the chan. The chan tippytoe the floyd. If the floyd does not chase the tobie then the tobie tippytoe the chan. If someone abacinate the tobie then the tobie is lepidote. If someone tippytoe the floyd then they see the tobie. If someone is unaccepted and not hawkish then they are not bombastic. If someone is vague and bombastic then they see the floyd. If someone activate the chan then they are not vague. The floyd does not see the floyd.", "logic": "\nHawkish(floyd)\nAbacinate(tobie, chan)\nTippytoe(chan, floyd)\nnot Tippytoe(floyd, tobie) -> Tippytoe(tobie, chan)\nforall x (Abacinate(x, tobie) -> Lepidote(tobie))\nforall x (Tippytoe(x, floyd) -> Abacinate(x, tobie))\nforall x (Unaccepted(x) and not Hawkish(x) -> not Bombastic(x))\nforall x (Vague(x) and Bombastic(x) -> Abacinate(x, floyd))\nforall x (Activate(x, chan) -> not Vague(x))\n\nnot Abacinate(floyd, floyd)\n\nforall x (Vague(x) and Bombastic(x) -> Abacinate(x, floyd)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The levin is delimited. The jeane alternate the klee. The klee corkscrew the levin. If the levin does not chase the jeane then the jeane corkscrew the klee. If someone alternate the jeane then the jeane is thirteenth. If someone corkscrew the levin then they see the jeane. If someone is degenerate and not delimited then they are not taciturn. If someone is elicited and taciturn then they see the levin. If someone suppurate the klee then they are not elicited. The klee suppurate the levin.", "logic": "\nDelimited(levin)\nAlternate(jeane, klee)\nCorkscrew(klee, levin)\nnot Corkscrew(levin, jeane) -> Corkscrew(jeane, klee)\nforall x (Alternate(x, jeane) -> Thirteenth(jeane))\nforall x (Corkscrew(x, levin) -> Alternate(x, jeane))\nforall x (Degenerate(x) and not Delimited(x) -> not Taciturn(x))\nforall x (Elicited(x) and Taciturn(x) -> Alternate(x, levin))\nforall x (Suppurate(x, klee) -> not Elicited(x))\n\nSuppurate(klee, levin)\n\nSuppurate(klee, levin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The nariko is sudsy. The yevette cashier the noreen. The noreen inspect the nariko. If the nariko does not chase the yevette then the yevette inspect the noreen. If someone cashier the yevette then the yevette is squiffy. If someone inspect the nariko then they see the yevette. If someone is ensuant and not sudsy then they are not crippled. If someone is abatic and crippled then they see the nariko. If someone brim the noreen then they are not abatic. The nariko does not visit the nariko.", "logic": "\nSudsy(nariko)\nCashier(yevette, noreen)\nInspect(noreen, nariko)\nnot Inspect(nariko, yevette) -> Inspect(yevette, noreen)\nforall x (Cashier(x, yevette) -> Squiffy(yevette))\nforall x (Inspect(x, nariko) -> Cashier(x, yevette))\nforall x (Ensuant(x) and not Sudsy(x) -> not Crippled(x))\nforall x (Abatic(x) and Crippled(x) -> Cashier(x, nariko))\nforall x (Brim(x, noreen) -> not Abatic(x))\n\nnot Brim(nariko, nariko)\n\nnot Brim(nariko, nariko) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The terrell is undefeated. The sloane foreground the susanne. The susanne anatomise the terrell. If the terrell does not chase the sloane then the sloane anatomise the susanne. If someone foreground the sloane then the sloane is fourhanded. If someone anatomise the terrell then they see the sloane. If someone is artistic and not undefeated then they are not ratty. If someone is willowy and ratty then they see the terrell. If someone darken the susanne then they are not willowy. The susanne is fourhanded.", "logic": "\nUndefeated(terrell)\nForeground(sloane, susanne)\nAnatomise(susanne, terrell)\nnot Anatomise(terrell, sloane) -> Anatomise(sloane, susanne)\nforall x (Foreground(x, sloane) -> Fourhanded(sloane))\nforall x (Anatomise(x, terrell) -> Foreground(x, sloane))\nforall x (Artistic(x) and not Undefeated(x) -> not Ratty(x))\nforall x (Willowy(x) and Ratty(x) -> Foreground(x, terrell))\nforall x (Darken(x, susanne) -> not Willowy(x))\n\nFourhanded(susanne)\n\nFourhanded(susanne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D2-164"} {"premises": "The horst is petulant. The horst is albinistic. The horst is biblical. The horst is condign. The horst is unprovable. If the horst is unprovable then the horst is albinistic. Kind things are unprovable. All biblical things are unprovable. If something is petulant then it is condign. Kind, albinistic things are condign. All albinistic things are condign. Young things are albinistic. If something is petulant and not unprovable then it is not albinistic. The horst is condign.", "logic": "\nPetulant(horst)\nAlbinistic(horst)\nBiblical(horst)\nCondign(horst)\nUnprovable(horst)\nUnprovable(horst) -> Albinistic(horst)\nforall x (Biblical(x) -> Unprovable(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) -> Unprovable(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Condign(x))\nforall x (Biblical(x) and Albinistic(x) -> Condign(x))\nforall x (Albinistic(x) -> Condign(x))\nforall x (Unprovable(x) -> Albinistic(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) and not Unprovable(x) -> not Albinistic(x))\n\nCondign(horst)\n\ntherefore Condign(horst)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2954"} {"premises": "The filipe is eightfold. The filipe is whiskery. The filipe is trilobate. The filipe is unpaved. The filipe is rayless. If the filipe is rayless then the filipe is whiskery. Kind things are rayless. All trilobate things are rayless. If something is eightfold then it is unpaved. Kind, whiskery things are unpaved. All whiskery things are unpaved. Young things are whiskery. If something is eightfold and not rayless then it is not whiskery. The filipe is not unpaved.", "logic": "\nEightfold(filipe)\nWhiskery(filipe)\nTrilobate(filipe)\nUnpaved(filipe)\nRayless(filipe)\nRayless(filipe) -> Whiskery(filipe)\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) -> Rayless(x))\nforall x (Eightfold(x) -> Unpaved(x))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) and Whiskery(x) -> Unpaved(x))\nforall x (Whiskery(x) -> Unpaved(x))\nforall x (Rayless(x) -> Whiskery(x))\nforall x (Eightfold(x) and not Rayless(x) -> not Whiskery(x))\n\nnot Unpaved(filipe)\n\ntherefore Unpaved(filipe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2954"} {"premises": "The scarface is unwavering. The scarface is sassy. The scarface is fain. The scarface is conveyable. The scarface is cloudy. If the scarface is cloudy then the scarface is sassy. Kind things are cloudy. All fain things are cloudy. If something is unwavering then it is conveyable. Kind, sassy things are conveyable. All sassy things are conveyable. Young things are sassy. If something is unwavering and not cloudy then it is not sassy. The scarface does not visit the scarface.", "logic": "\nUnwavering(scarface)\nSassy(scarface)\nFain(scarface)\nConveyable(scarface)\nCloudy(scarface)\nCloudy(scarface) -> Sassy(scarface)\nforall x (Fain(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Fain(x) -> Cloudy(x))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Fain(x) and Sassy(x) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Sassy(x) -> Conveyable(x))\nforall x (Cloudy(x) -> Sassy(x))\nforall x (Unwavering(x) and not Cloudy(x) -> not Sassy(x))\n\nnot Visits(scarface, scarface)\n\nnot Visits(scarface, scarface) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2954"} {"premises": "The mickie is snooty. The mickie is driving. The mickie is unsatiable. The mickie is raising. The mickie is indicatory. If the mickie is indicatory then the mickie is driving. Kind things are indicatory. All unsatiable things are indicatory. If something is snooty then it is raising. Kind, driving things are raising. All driving things are raising. Young things are driving. If something is snooty and not indicatory then it is not driving. The mickie likes the mickie.", "logic": "\nSnooty(mickie)\nDriving(mickie)\nUnsatiable(mickie)\nRaising(mickie)\nIndicatory(mickie)\nIndicatory(mickie) -> Driving(mickie)\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) -> Indicatory(x))\nforall x (Snooty(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Unsatiable(x) and Driving(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Indicatory(x) -> Driving(x))\nforall x (Snooty(x) and not Indicatory(x) -> not Driving(x))\n\nLikes(mickie, mickie)\n\nLikes(mickie, mickie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-2954"} {"premises": "Brit is urogenital. Fred is not ingrained. Rinaldo is undrained. Gwenn is not colorless. All runic, tolerable people are urogenital. All ingrained people are urogenital. If someone is sixfold and not undrained then they are colorless. Kind, tolerable people are colorless. If someone is urogenital then they are colorless. All undrained people are not runic. If someone is sixfold then they are tolerable. Kind, colorless people are sixfold. Brit is urogenital.", "logic": "\nUrogenital(brit)\nnot Ingrained(fred)\nUndrained(rinaldo)\nnot Colorless(gwenn)\nforall x (Runic(x) and Tolerable(x) -> Urogenital(x))\nforall x (Ingrained(x) -> Urogenital(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and not Undrained(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) and Tolerable(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) -> Colorless(x))\nforall x (Undrained(x) -> not Runic(x))\nforall x (Sixfold(x) -> Tolerable(x))\nforall x (Urogenital(x) and Colorless(x) -> Sixfold(x))\n\nUrogenital(brit)\n\ntherefore Urogenital(brit)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Libbi is spoiled. Lolita is not mercenary. Alfonse is admirable. Christen is not relieved. All redux, ramose people are spoiled. All mercenary people are spoiled. If someone is swingeing and not admirable then they are relieved. Kind, ramose people are relieved. If someone is spoiled then they are relieved. All admirable people are not redux. If someone is swingeing then they are ramose. Kind, relieved people are swingeing. Lolita is mercenary.", "logic": "\nSpoiled(libbi)\nnot Mercenary(lolita)\nAdmirable(alfonse)\nnot Relieved(christen)\nforall x (Redux(x) and Ramose(x) -> Spoiled(x))\nforall x (Mercenary(x) -> Spoiled(x))\nforall x (Swingeing(x) and not Admirable(x) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) and Ramose(x) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) -> Relieved(x))\nforall x (Admirable(x) -> not Redux(x))\nforall x (Swingeing(x) -> Ramose(x))\nforall x (Spoiled(x) and Relieved(x) -> Swingeing(x))\n\nMercenary(lolita)\n\ntherefore not Mercenary(lolita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Wilona is feasible. Tharen is not unburied. Eva is thirdhand. Kaleena is not estranged. All obedient, grasslike people are feasible. All unburied people are feasible. If someone is glary and not thirdhand then they are estranged. Kind, grasslike people are estranged. If someone is feasible then they are estranged. All thirdhand people are not obedient. If someone is glary then they are grasslike. Kind, estranged people are glary. Eva is not obedient.", "logic": "\nFeasible(wilona)\nnot Unburied(tharen)\nThirdhand(eva)\nnot Estranged(kaleena)\nforall x (Obedient(x) and Grasslike(x) -> Feasible(x))\nforall x (Unburied(x) -> Feasible(x))\nforall x (Glary(x) and not Thirdhand(x) -> Estranged(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) and Grasslike(x) -> Estranged(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) -> Estranged(x))\nforall x (Thirdhand(x) -> not Obedient(x))\nforall x (Glary(x) -> Grasslike(x))\nforall x (Feasible(x) and Estranged(x) -> Glary(x))\n\nnot Obedient(eva)\n\nThirdhand(eva) and forall x (Thirdhand(x) -> not Obedient(x)) -> therefore not Obedient(eva)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Tiphany is mesmeric. Valentine is not ethnologic. Carrissa is unlucky. Muire is not strong. All mercenary, agonising people are mesmeric. All ethnologic people are mesmeric. If someone is telltale and not unlucky then they are strong. Kind, agonising people are strong. If someone is mesmeric then they are strong. All unlucky people are not mercenary. If someone is telltale then they are agonising. Kind, strong people are telltale. Carrissa is mercenary.", "logic": "\nMesmeric(tiphany)\nnot Ethnologic(valentine)\nUnlucky(carrissa)\nnot Strong(muire)\nforall x (Mercenary(x) and Agonising(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Ethnologic(x) -> Mesmeric(x))\nforall x (Telltale(x) and not Unlucky(x) -> Strong(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) and Agonising(x) -> Strong(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) -> Strong(x))\nforall x (Unlucky(x) -> not Mercenary(x))\nforall x (Telltale(x) -> Agonising(x))\nforall x (Mesmeric(x) and Strong(x) -> Telltale(x))\n\nMercenary(carrissa)\n\nUnlucky(carrissa) and forall x (Unlucky(x) -> not Mercenary(x)) -> therefore not Mercenary(carrissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Zarla is libidinal. Gillian is not advective. Francisca is divergent. Shimon is not mocking. All banner, potbound people are libidinal. All advective people are libidinal. If someone is overall and not divergent then they are mocking. Kind, potbound people are mocking. If someone is libidinal then they are mocking. All divergent people are not banner. If someone is overall then they are potbound. Kind, mocking people are overall. Zarla is overall.", "logic": "\nLibidinal(zarla)\nnot Advective(gillian)\nDivergent(francisca)\nnot Mocking(shimon)\nforall x (Banner(x) and Potbound(x) -> Libidinal(x))\nforall x (Advective(x) -> Libidinal(x))\nforall x (Overall(x) and not Divergent(x) -> Mocking(x))\nforall x (Libidinal(x) and Potbound(x) -> Mocking(x))\nforall x (Libidinal(x) -> Mocking(x))\nforall x (Divergent(x) -> not Banner(x))\nforall x (Overall(x) -> Potbound(x))\nforall x (Libidinal(x) and Mocking(x) -> Overall(x))\n\nOverall(zarla)\n\nLibidinal(zarla) and forall x (Libidinal(x) -> Mocking(x)) -> therefore Mocking(zarla) Libidinal(zarla) and Mocking(zarla) and forall x (Libidinal(x) and Mocking(x) -> Overall(x)) -> therefore Overall(zarla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Loni is quenchless. Cora is not uncordial. Tad is strung. Andria is not chylous. All compelling, continuant people are quenchless. All uncordial people are quenchless. If someone is curvaceous and not strung then they are chylous. Kind, continuant people are chylous. If someone is quenchless then they are chylous. All strung people are not compelling. If someone is curvaceous then they are continuant. Kind, chylous people are curvaceous. Loni is not curvaceous.", "logic": "\nQuenchless(loni)\nnot Uncordial(cora)\nStrung(tad)\nnot Chylous(andria)\nforall x (Compelling(x) and Continuant(x) -> Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Uncordial(x) -> Quenchless(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) and not Strung(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) and Continuant(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> Chylous(x))\nforall x (Strung(x) -> not Compelling(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) -> Continuant(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) and Chylous(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\n\nnot Curvaceous(loni)\n\nQuenchless(loni) and forall x (Quenchless(x) -> Chylous(x)) -> therefore Chylous(loni) Quenchless(loni) and Chylous(loni) and forall x (Quenchless(x) and Chylous(x) -> Curvaceous(x)) -> therefore Curvaceous(loni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Nettie is lusty. Olivie is not spendable. Pearl is abashed. Eolande is not bulbar. All rightist, assiduous people are lusty. All spendable people are lusty. If someone is titled and not abashed then they are bulbar. Kind, assiduous people are bulbar. If someone is lusty then they are bulbar. All abashed people are not rightist. If someone is titled then they are assiduous. Kind, bulbar people are titled. Nettie is assiduous.", "logic": "\nLusty(nettie)\nnot Spendable(olivie)\nAbashed(pearl)\nnot Bulbar(eolande)\nforall x (Rightist(x) and Assiduous(x) -> Lusty(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Lusty(x))\nforall x (Titled(x) and not Abashed(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Lusty(x) and Assiduous(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Lusty(x) -> Bulbar(x))\nforall x (Abashed(x) -> not Rightist(x))\nforall x (Titled(x) -> Assiduous(x))\nforall x (Lusty(x) and Bulbar(x) -> Titled(x))\n\nAssiduous(nettie)\n\nLusty(nettie) and forall x (Lusty(x) -> Bulbar(x)) -> therefore Bulbar(nettie) Lusty(nettie) and Bulbar(nettie) and forall x (Lusty(x) and Bulbar(x) -> Titled(x)) -> therefore Titled(nettie) Titled(nettie) and forall x (Titled(x) -> Assiduous(x)) -> therefore Assiduous(nettie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Ruella is honeylike. Salman is not bolshevist. Kit is disyllabic. Fidela is not next. All reckless, nonracist people are honeylike. All bolshevist people are honeylike. If someone is amygdaloid and not disyllabic then they are next. Kind, nonracist people are next. If someone is honeylike then they are next. All disyllabic people are not reckless. If someone is amygdaloid then they are nonracist. Kind, next people are amygdaloid. Ruella is not nonracist.", "logic": "\nHoneylike(ruella)\nnot Bolshevist(salman)\nDisyllabic(kit)\nnot Next(fidela)\nforall x (Reckless(x) and Nonracist(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Bolshevist(x) -> Honeylike(x))\nforall x (Amygdaloid(x) and not Disyllabic(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) and Nonracist(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) -> Next(x))\nforall x (Disyllabic(x) -> not Reckless(x))\nforall x (Amygdaloid(x) -> Nonracist(x))\nforall x (Honeylike(x) and Next(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\n\nnot Nonracist(ruella)\n\nHoneylike(ruella) and forall x (Honeylike(x) -> Next(x)) -> therefore Next(ruella) Honeylike(ruella) and Next(ruella) and forall x (Honeylike(x) and Next(x) -> Amygdaloid(x)) -> therefore Amygdaloid(ruella) Amygdaloid(ruella) and forall x (Amygdaloid(x) -> Nonracist(x)) -> therefore Nonracist(ruella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Cristina is kosher. Marko is not awned. Apollo is telescopic. Averill is not cursory. All cloying, fugacious people are kosher. All awned people are kosher. If someone is nonpareil and not telescopic then they are cursory. Kind, fugacious people are cursory. If someone is kosher then they are cursory. All telescopic people are not cloying. If someone is nonpareil then they are fugacious. Kind, cursory people are nonpareil. Apollo is not nonpareil.", "logic": "\nKosher(cristina)\nnot Awned(marko)\nTelescopic(apollo)\nnot Cursory(averill)\nforall x (Cloying(x) and Fugacious(x) -> Kosher(x))\nforall x (Awned(x) -> Kosher(x))\nforall x (Nonpareil(x) and not Telescopic(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Fugacious(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) -> Cursory(x))\nforall x (Telescopic(x) -> not Cloying(x))\nforall x (Nonpareil(x) -> Fugacious(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Cursory(x) -> Nonpareil(x))\n\nnot Nonpareil(apollo)\n\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Cursory(x) -> Nonpareil(x)) <- forall x (Cloying(x) and Fugacious(x) -> Kosher(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Gunvor is spicy. Kalle is not uncut. Marika is impudent. Terrel is not cranial. All xvii, bunchy people are spicy. All uncut people are spicy. If someone is expansible and not impudent then they are cranial. Kind, bunchy people are cranial. If someone is spicy then they are cranial. All impudent people are not xvii. If someone is expansible then they are bunchy. Kind, cranial people are expansible. Marika is cranial.", "logic": "\nSpicy(gunvor)\nnot Uncut(kalle)\nImpudent(marika)\nnot Cranial(terrel)\nforall x (Xvii(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Spicy(x))\nforall x (Uncut(x) -> Spicy(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) and not Impudent(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Spicy(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Spicy(x) -> Cranial(x))\nforall x (Impudent(x) -> not Xvii(x))\nforall x (Expansible(x) -> Bunchy(x))\nforall x (Spicy(x) and Cranial(x) -> Expansible(x))\n\nCranial(marika)\n\nforall x (Spicy(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Cranial(x)) <- forall x (Xvii(x) and Bunchy(x) -> Spicy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Linnell is hourlong. Emil is not sleeping. Meyer is innoxious. Roanne is not antisocial. All sixty, inheriting people are hourlong. All sleeping people are hourlong. If someone is annular and not innoxious then they are antisocial. Kind, inheriting people are antisocial. If someone is hourlong then they are antisocial. All innoxious people are not sixty. If someone is annular then they are inheriting. Kind, antisocial people are annular. Roanne is not annular.", "logic": "\nHourlong(linnell)\nnot Sleeping(emil)\nInnoxious(meyer)\nnot Antisocial(roanne)\nforall x (Sixty(x) and Inheriting(x) -> Hourlong(x))\nforall x (Sleeping(x) -> Hourlong(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) and not Innoxious(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nforall x (Hourlong(x) and Inheriting(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nforall x (Hourlong(x) -> Antisocial(x))\nforall x (Innoxious(x) -> not Sixty(x))\nforall x (Annular(x) -> Inheriting(x))\nforall x (Hourlong(x) and Antisocial(x) -> Annular(x))\n\nnot Annular(roanne)\n\nforall x (Hourlong(x) and Antisocial(x) -> Annular(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Concordia is numb. Annelise is not yemeni. Maurita is deflective. Harriette is not unbeatable. All conical, attendant people are numb. All yemeni people are numb. If someone is smarmy and not deflective then they are unbeatable. Kind, attendant people are unbeatable. If someone is numb then they are unbeatable. All deflective people are not conical. If someone is smarmy then they are attendant. Kind, unbeatable people are smarmy. Annelise is unbeatable.", "logic": "\nNumb(concordia)\nnot Yemeni(annelise)\nDeflective(maurita)\nnot Unbeatable(harriette)\nforall x (Conical(x) and Attendant(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Yemeni(x) -> Numb(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) and not Deflective(x) -> Unbeatable(x))\nforall x (Numb(x) and Attendant(x) -> Unbeatable(x))\nforall x (Numb(x) -> Unbeatable(x))\nforall x (Deflective(x) -> not Conical(x))\nforall x (Smarmy(x) -> Attendant(x))\nforall x (Numb(x) and Unbeatable(x) -> Smarmy(x))\n\nUnbeatable(annelise)\n\nforall x (Numb(x) and Attendant(x) -> Unbeatable(x)) <- forall x (Conical(x) and Attendant(x) -> Numb(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Ethyl is expedient. Enid is not unhealthy. Thomasin is saclike. Karisa is not eurafrican. All roomy, amuck people are expedient. All unhealthy people are expedient. If someone is stagy and not saclike then they are eurafrican. Kind, amuck people are eurafrican. If someone is expedient then they are eurafrican. All saclike people are not roomy. If someone is stagy then they are amuck. Kind, eurafrican people are stagy. Karisa is not unhealthy.", "logic": "\nExpedient(ethyl)\nnot Unhealthy(enid)\nSaclike(thomasin)\nnot Eurafrican(karisa)\nforall x (Roomy(x) and Amuck(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Unhealthy(x) -> Expedient(x))\nforall x (Stagy(x) and not Saclike(x) -> Eurafrican(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) and Amuck(x) -> Eurafrican(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) -> Eurafrican(x))\nforall x (Saclike(x) -> not Roomy(x))\nforall x (Stagy(x) -> Amuck(x))\nforall x (Expedient(x) and Eurafrican(x) -> Stagy(x))\n\nnot Unhealthy(karisa)\n\nnot Unhealthy(karisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Taylor is articulate. Vivi is not unsuited. Bernadine is lipotropic. Dieter is not orthogonal. All bicolor, bounden people are articulate. All unsuited people are articulate. If someone is leafy and not lipotropic then they are orthogonal. Kind, bounden people are orthogonal. If someone is articulate then they are orthogonal. All lipotropic people are not bicolor. If someone is leafy then they are bounden. Kind, orthogonal people are leafy. Bernadine is unsuited.", "logic": "\nArticulate(taylor)\nnot Unsuited(vivi)\nLipotropic(bernadine)\nnot Orthogonal(dieter)\nforall x (Bicolor(x) and Bounden(x) -> Articulate(x))\nforall x (Unsuited(x) -> Articulate(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) and not Lipotropic(x) -> Orthogonal(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x) and Bounden(x) -> Orthogonal(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x) -> Orthogonal(x))\nforall x (Lipotropic(x) -> not Bicolor(x))\nforall x (Leafy(x) -> Bounden(x))\nforall x (Articulate(x) and Orthogonal(x) -> Leafy(x))\n\nUnsuited(bernadine)\n\nUnsuited(bernadine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Maggy is knockabout. Cammy is not tempering. Bernete is cupric. Gertruda is not incertain. All tired, palpebrate people are knockabout. All tempering people are knockabout. If someone is tailed and not cupric then they are incertain. Kind, palpebrate people are incertain. If someone is knockabout then they are incertain. All cupric people are not tired. If someone is tailed then they are palpebrate. Kind, incertain people are tailed. Maggy is not tired.", "logic": "\nKnockabout(maggy)\nnot Tempering(cammy)\nCupric(bernete)\nnot Incertain(gertruda)\nforall x (Tired(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Knockabout(x))\nforall x (Tempering(x) -> Knockabout(x))\nforall x (Tailed(x) and not Cupric(x) -> Incertain(x))\nforall x (Knockabout(x) and Palpebrate(x) -> Incertain(x))\nforall x (Knockabout(x) -> Incertain(x))\nforall x (Cupric(x) -> not Tired(x))\nforall x (Tailed(x) -> Palpebrate(x))\nforall x (Knockabout(x) and Incertain(x) -> Tailed(x))\n\nnot Tired(maggy)\n\nnot Tired(maggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "Coretta is sweltry. Mei is not topologic. Goddard is biaxate. Katya is not metameric. All afloat, unlikable people are sweltry. All topologic people are sweltry. If someone is seeable and not biaxate then they are metameric. Kind, unlikable people are metameric. If someone is sweltry then they are metameric. All biaxate people are not afloat. If someone is seeable then they are unlikable. Kind, metameric people are seeable. Coretta is topologic.", "logic": "\nSweltry(coretta)\nnot Topologic(mei)\nBiaxate(goddard)\nnot Metameric(katya)\nforall x (Afloat(x) and Unlikable(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nforall x (Topologic(x) -> Sweltry(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) and not Biaxate(x) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Unlikable(x) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) -> Metameric(x))\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> not Afloat(x))\nforall x (Seeable(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nforall x (Sweltry(x) and Metameric(x) -> Seeable(x))\n\nTopologic(coretta)\n\nTopologic(coretta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The jervis does not chase the kamillah. The finley does not chase the jervis. The finley caramelize the kamillah. The finley is spouting. The finley is moorish. The finley is not reclaimed. The finley hearken the jervis. The finley does not need the kamillah. The kamillah caramelize the finley. The kamillah jostle the jervis. The kamillah is not spouting. The kamillah hearken the finley. If something caramelize the kamillah and it hearken the finley then the kamillah hearken the jervis. If something jostle the jervis and it is not spouting then it hearken the kamillah. If something is moorish then it hearken the finley. If something hearken the jervis and it hearken the finley then it does not eat the finley. If something caramelize the finley and it is not reclaimed then the finley does not need the jervis. If the jervis is flint and the jervis does not need the finley then the finley hearken the jervis. The kamillah jostle the jervis.", "logic": "\nnot Caramelize(jervis, kamillah)\nnot Caramelize(finley, jervis)\nCaramelize(finley, kamillah)\nSpouting(finley)\nMoorish(finley)\nnot Reclaimed(finley)\nHearken(finley, jervis)\nnot Hearken(finley, kamillah)\nCaramelize(kamillah, finley)\nJostle(kamillah, jervis)\nnot Spouting(kamillah)\nHearken(kamillah, finley)\nforall x (Caramelize(x, kamillah) and Hearken(x, finley) -> Hearken(kamillah, jervis))\nforall x (Jostle(x, jervis) and not Spouting(x) -> Hearken(x, kamillah))\nforall x (Moorish(x) -> Hearken(x, finley))\nforall x (Hearken(x, jervis) and Hearken(x, finley) -> not Jostle(x, finley))\nforall x (Caramelize(x, finley) and not Reclaimed(x) -> not Hearken(finley, jervis))\nFlint(jervis) and not Hearken(jervis, finley) -> Hearken(finley, jervis)\n\nJostle(kamillah, jervis)\n\ntherefore Jostle(kamillah, jervis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The theda does not chase the corenda. The philip does not chase the theda. The philip deliver the corenda. The philip is completing. The philip is threefold. The philip is not facial. The philip rifle the theda. The philip does not need the corenda. The corenda deliver the philip. The corenda cheep the theda. The corenda is not completing. The corenda rifle the philip. If something deliver the corenda and it rifle the philip then the corenda rifle the theda. If something cheep the theda and it is not completing then it rifle the corenda. If something is threefold then it rifle the philip. If something rifle the theda and it rifle the philip then it does not eat the philip. If something deliver the philip and it is not facial then the philip does not need the theda. If the theda is diarrheal and the theda does not need the philip then the philip rifle the theda. The corenda does not need the philip.", "logic": "\nnot Deliver(theda, corenda)\nnot Deliver(philip, theda)\nDeliver(philip, corenda)\nCompleting(philip)\nThreefold(philip)\nnot Facial(philip)\nRifle(philip, theda)\nnot Rifle(philip, corenda)\nDeliver(corenda, philip)\nCheep(corenda, theda)\nnot Completing(corenda)\nRifle(corenda, philip)\nforall x (Deliver(x, corenda) and Rifle(x, philip) -> Rifle(corenda, theda))\nforall x (Cheep(x, theda) and not Completing(x) -> Rifle(x, corenda))\nforall x (Threefold(x) -> Rifle(x, philip))\nforall x (Rifle(x, theda) and Rifle(x, philip) -> not Cheep(x, philip))\nforall x (Deliver(x, philip) and not Facial(x) -> not Rifle(philip, theda))\nDiarrheal(theda) and not Rifle(theda, philip) -> Rifle(philip, theda)\n\nnot Rifle(corenda, philip)\n\ntherefore Rifle(corenda, philip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The carolie does not chase the ryann. The carie does not chase the carolie. The carie vegetate the ryann. The carie is chondritic. The carie is fulgurous. The carie is not inviolable. The carie lowball the carolie. The carie does not need the ryann. The ryann vegetate the carie. The ryann recommit the carolie. The ryann is not chondritic. The ryann lowball the carie. If something vegetate the ryann and it lowball the carie then the ryann lowball the carolie. If something recommit the carolie and it is not chondritic then it lowball the ryann. If something is fulgurous then it lowball the carie. If something lowball the carolie and it lowball the carie then it does not eat the carie. If something vegetate the carie and it is not inviolable then the carie does not need the carolie. If the carolie is omnivorous and the carolie does not need the carie then the carie lowball the carolie. The ryann lowball the ryann.", "logic": "\nnot Vegetate(carolie, ryann)\nnot Vegetate(carie, carolie)\nVegetate(carie, ryann)\nChondritic(carie)\nFulgurous(carie)\nnot Inviolable(carie)\nLowball(carie, carolie)\nnot Lowball(carie, ryann)\nVegetate(ryann, carie)\nRecommit(ryann, carolie)\nnot Chondritic(ryann)\nLowball(ryann, carie)\nforall x (Vegetate(x, ryann) and Lowball(x, carie) -> Lowball(ryann, carolie))\nforall x (Recommit(x, carolie) and not Chondritic(x) -> Lowball(x, ryann))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Lowball(x, carie))\nforall x (Lowball(x, carolie) and Lowball(x, carie) -> not Recommit(x, carie))\nforall x (Vegetate(x, carie) and not Inviolable(x) -> not Lowball(carie, carolie))\nOmnivorous(carolie) and not Lowball(carolie, carie) -> Lowball(carie, carolie)\n\nLowball(ryann, ryann)\n\nRecommit(ryann, carolie) and not Chondritic(ryann) and forall x (Recommit(x, carolie) and not Chondritic(x) -> Lowball(x, ryann)) -> therefore Lowball(ryann, ryann)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The ketti does not chase the barney. The jakob does not chase the ketti. The jakob hoist the barney. The jakob is carroty. The jakob is hindoo. The jakob is not unsuitable. The jakob civilize the ketti. The jakob does not need the barney. The barney hoist the jakob. The barney maintain the ketti. The barney is not carroty. The barney civilize the jakob. If something hoist the barney and it civilize the jakob then the barney civilize the ketti. If something maintain the ketti and it is not carroty then it civilize the barney. If something is hindoo then it civilize the jakob. If something civilize the ketti and it civilize the jakob then it does not eat the jakob. If something hoist the jakob and it is not unsuitable then the jakob does not need the ketti. If the ketti is nether and the ketti does not need the jakob then the jakob civilize the ketti. The barney does not need the barney.", "logic": "\nnot Hoist(ketti, barney)\nnot Hoist(jakob, ketti)\nHoist(jakob, barney)\nCarroty(jakob)\nHindoo(jakob)\nnot Unsuitable(jakob)\nCivilize(jakob, ketti)\nnot Civilize(jakob, barney)\nHoist(barney, jakob)\nMaintain(barney, ketti)\nnot Carroty(barney)\nCivilize(barney, jakob)\nforall x (Hoist(x, barney) and Civilize(x, jakob) -> Civilize(barney, ketti))\nforall x (Maintain(x, ketti) and not Carroty(x) -> Civilize(x, barney))\nforall x (Hindoo(x) -> Civilize(x, jakob))\nforall x (Civilize(x, ketti) and Civilize(x, jakob) -> not Maintain(x, jakob))\nforall x (Hoist(x, jakob) and not Unsuitable(x) -> not Civilize(jakob, ketti))\nNether(ketti) and not Civilize(ketti, jakob) -> Civilize(jakob, ketti)\n\nnot Civilize(barney, barney)\n\nMaintain(barney, ketti) and not Carroty(barney) and forall x (Maintain(x, ketti) and not Carroty(x) -> Civilize(x, barney)) -> therefore Civilize(barney, barney)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The emelia does not chase the andria. The alexa does not chase the emelia. The alexa mineralize the andria. The alexa is craved. The alexa is tomentose. The alexa is not unplayable. The alexa reappraise the emelia. The alexa does not need the andria. The andria mineralize the alexa. The andria avoid the emelia. The andria is not craved. The andria reappraise the alexa. If something mineralize the andria and it reappraise the alexa then the andria reappraise the emelia. If something avoid the emelia and it is not craved then it reappraise the andria. If something is tomentose then it reappraise the alexa. If something reappraise the emelia and it reappraise the alexa then it does not eat the alexa. If something mineralize the alexa and it is not unplayable then the alexa does not need the emelia. If the emelia is accoutred and the emelia does not need the alexa then the alexa reappraise the emelia. The andria reappraise the emelia.", "logic": "\nnot Mineralize(emelia, andria)\nnot Mineralize(alexa, emelia)\nMineralize(alexa, andria)\nCraved(alexa)\nTomentose(alexa)\nnot Unplayable(alexa)\nReappraise(alexa, emelia)\nnot Reappraise(alexa, andria)\nMineralize(andria, alexa)\nAvoid(andria, emelia)\nnot Craved(andria)\nReappraise(andria, alexa)\nforall x (Mineralize(x, andria) and Reappraise(x, alexa) -> Reappraise(andria, emelia))\nforall x (Avoid(x, emelia) and not Craved(x) -> Reappraise(x, andria))\nforall x (Tomentose(x) -> Reappraise(x, alexa))\nforall x (Reappraise(x, emelia) and Reappraise(x, alexa) -> not Avoid(x, alexa))\nforall x (Mineralize(x, alexa) and not Unplayable(x) -> not Reappraise(alexa, emelia))\nAccoutred(emelia) and not Reappraise(emelia, alexa) -> Reappraise(alexa, emelia)\n\nReappraise(andria, emelia)\n\nTomentose(alexa) and forall x (Tomentose(x) -> Reappraise(x, alexa)) -> therefore Reappraise(alexa, alexa) Mineralize(alexa, andria) and Reappraise(alexa, alexa) and forall x (Mineralize(x, andria) and Reappraise(x, alexa) -> Reappraise(andria, emelia)) -> therefore Reappraise(andria, emelia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The orson does not chase the sabine. The jerrold does not chase the orson. The jerrold envenom the sabine. The jerrold is reborn. The jerrold is numidian. The jerrold is not binding. The jerrold nasalize the orson. The jerrold does not need the sabine. The sabine envenom the jerrold. The sabine reconvene the orson. The sabine is not reborn. The sabine nasalize the jerrold. If something envenom the sabine and it nasalize the jerrold then the sabine nasalize the orson. If something reconvene the orson and it is not reborn then it nasalize the sabine. If something is numidian then it nasalize the jerrold. If something nasalize the orson and it nasalize the jerrold then it does not eat the jerrold. If something envenom the jerrold and it is not binding then the jerrold does not need the orson. If the orson is congruous and the orson does not need the jerrold then the jerrold nasalize the orson. The sabine does not need the orson.", "logic": "\nnot Envenom(orson, sabine)\nnot Envenom(jerrold, orson)\nEnvenom(jerrold, sabine)\nReborn(jerrold)\nNumidian(jerrold)\nnot Binding(jerrold)\nNasalize(jerrold, orson)\nnot Nasalize(jerrold, sabine)\nEnvenom(sabine, jerrold)\nReconvene(sabine, orson)\nnot Reborn(sabine)\nNasalize(sabine, jerrold)\nforall x (Envenom(x, sabine) and Nasalize(x, jerrold) -> Nasalize(sabine, orson))\nforall x (Reconvene(x, orson) and not Reborn(x) -> Nasalize(x, sabine))\nforall x (Numidian(x) -> Nasalize(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Nasalize(x, orson) and Nasalize(x, jerrold) -> not Reconvene(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Envenom(x, jerrold) and not Binding(x) -> not Nasalize(jerrold, orson))\nCongruous(orson) and not Nasalize(orson, jerrold) -> Nasalize(jerrold, orson)\n\nnot Nasalize(sabine, orson)\n\nNumidian(jerrold) and forall x (Numidian(x) -> Nasalize(x, jerrold)) -> therefore Nasalize(jerrold, jerrold) Envenom(jerrold, sabine) and Nasalize(jerrold, jerrold) and forall x (Envenom(x, sabine) and Nasalize(x, jerrold) -> Nasalize(sabine, orson)) -> therefore Nasalize(sabine, orson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The britte does not chase the tiertza. The martina does not chase the britte. The martina sense the tiertza. The martina is acroscopic. The martina is swiss. The martina is not another. The martina litter the britte. The martina does not need the tiertza. The tiertza sense the martina. The tiertza whisk the britte. The tiertza is not acroscopic. The tiertza litter the martina. If something sense the tiertza and it litter the martina then the tiertza litter the britte. If something whisk the britte and it is not acroscopic then it litter the tiertza. If something is swiss then it litter the martina. If something litter the britte and it litter the martina then it does not eat the martina. If something sense the martina and it is not another then the martina does not need the britte. If the britte is chary and the britte does not need the martina then the martina litter the britte. The tiertza does not eat the martina.", "logic": "\nnot Sense(britte, tiertza)\nnot Sense(martina, britte)\nSense(martina, tiertza)\nAcroscopic(martina)\nSwiss(martina)\nnot Another(martina)\nLitter(martina, britte)\nnot Litter(martina, tiertza)\nSense(tiertza, martina)\nWhisk(tiertza, britte)\nnot Acroscopic(tiertza)\nLitter(tiertza, martina)\nforall x (Sense(x, tiertza) and Litter(x, martina) -> Litter(tiertza, britte))\nforall x (Whisk(x, britte) and not Acroscopic(x) -> Litter(x, tiertza))\nforall x (Swiss(x) -> Litter(x, martina))\nforall x (Litter(x, britte) and Litter(x, martina) -> not Whisk(x, martina))\nforall x (Sense(x, martina) and not Another(x) -> not Litter(martina, britte))\nChary(britte) and not Litter(britte, martina) -> Litter(martina, britte)\n\nnot Whisk(tiertza, martina)\n\nSwiss(martina) and forall x (Swiss(x) -> Litter(x, martina)) -> therefore Litter(martina, martina) Sense(martina, tiertza) and Litter(martina, martina) and forall x (Sense(x, tiertza) and Litter(x, martina) -> Litter(tiertza, britte)) -> therefore Litter(tiertza, britte) Litter(tiertza, britte) and Litter(tiertza, martina) and forall x (Litter(x, britte) and Litter(x, martina) -> not Whisk(x, martina)) -> therefore not Whisk(tiertza, martina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The fancie does not chase the oliver. The kailey does not chase the fancie. The kailey aurify the oliver. The kailey is forgiving. The kailey is affordable. The kailey is not removed. The kailey proctor the fancie. The kailey does not need the oliver. The oliver aurify the kailey. The oliver correspond the fancie. The oliver is not forgiving. The oliver proctor the kailey. If something aurify the oliver and it proctor the kailey then the oliver proctor the fancie. If something correspond the fancie and it is not forgiving then it proctor the oliver. If something is affordable then it proctor the kailey. If something proctor the fancie and it proctor the kailey then it does not eat the kailey. If something aurify the kailey and it is not removed then the kailey does not need the fancie. If the fancie is clenched and the fancie does not need the kailey then the kailey proctor the fancie. The oliver correspond the kailey.", "logic": "\nnot Aurify(fancie, oliver)\nnot Aurify(kailey, fancie)\nAurify(kailey, oliver)\nForgiving(kailey)\nAffordable(kailey)\nnot Removed(kailey)\nProctor(kailey, fancie)\nnot Proctor(kailey, oliver)\nAurify(oliver, kailey)\nCorrespond(oliver, fancie)\nnot Forgiving(oliver)\nProctor(oliver, kailey)\nforall x (Aurify(x, oliver) and Proctor(x, kailey) -> Proctor(oliver, fancie))\nforall x (Correspond(x, fancie) and not Forgiving(x) -> Proctor(x, oliver))\nforall x (Affordable(x) -> Proctor(x, kailey))\nforall x (Proctor(x, fancie) and Proctor(x, kailey) -> not Correspond(x, kailey))\nforall x (Aurify(x, kailey) and not Removed(x) -> not Proctor(kailey, fancie))\nClenched(fancie) and not Proctor(fancie, kailey) -> Proctor(kailey, fancie)\n\nCorrespond(oliver, kailey)\n\nAffordable(kailey) and forall x (Affordable(x) -> Proctor(x, kailey)) -> therefore Proctor(kailey, kailey) Aurify(kailey, oliver) and Proctor(kailey, kailey) and forall x (Aurify(x, oliver) and Proctor(x, kailey) -> Proctor(oliver, fancie)) -> therefore Proctor(oliver, fancie) Proctor(oliver, fancie) and Proctor(oliver, kailey) and forall x (Proctor(x, fancie) and Proctor(x, kailey) -> not Correspond(x, kailey)) -> therefore not Correspond(oliver, kailey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The genvieve does not chase the clotilda. The michaela does not chase the genvieve. The michaela convoy the clotilda. The michaela is cyprinid. The michaela is odious. The michaela is not lentiform. The michaela bankrupt the genvieve. The michaela does not need the clotilda. The clotilda convoy the michaela. The clotilda apportion the genvieve. The clotilda is not cyprinid. The clotilda bankrupt the michaela. If something convoy the clotilda and it bankrupt the michaela then the clotilda bankrupt the genvieve. If something apportion the genvieve and it is not cyprinid then it bankrupt the clotilda. If something is odious then it bankrupt the michaela. If something bankrupt the genvieve and it bankrupt the michaela then it does not eat the michaela. If something convoy the michaela and it is not lentiform then the michaela does not need the genvieve. If the genvieve is hated and the genvieve does not need the michaela then the michaela bankrupt the genvieve. The genvieve does not need the michaela.", "logic": "\nnot Convoy(genvieve, clotilda)\nnot Convoy(michaela, genvieve)\nConvoy(michaela, clotilda)\nCyprinid(michaela)\nOdious(michaela)\nnot Lentiform(michaela)\nBankrupt(michaela, genvieve)\nnot Bankrupt(michaela, clotilda)\nConvoy(clotilda, michaela)\nApportion(clotilda, genvieve)\nnot Cyprinid(clotilda)\nBankrupt(clotilda, michaela)\nforall x (Convoy(x, clotilda) and Bankrupt(x, michaela) -> Bankrupt(clotilda, genvieve))\nforall x (Apportion(x, genvieve) and not Cyprinid(x) -> Bankrupt(x, clotilda))\nforall x (Odious(x) -> Bankrupt(x, michaela))\nforall x (Bankrupt(x, genvieve) and Bankrupt(x, michaela) -> not Apportion(x, michaela))\nforall x (Convoy(x, michaela) and not Lentiform(x) -> not Bankrupt(michaela, genvieve))\nHated(genvieve) and not Bankrupt(genvieve, michaela) -> Bankrupt(michaela, genvieve)\n\nnot Bankrupt(genvieve, michaela)\n\nforall x (Odious(x) -> Bankrupt(x, michaela)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The whitaker does not chase the ernesta. The lionello does not chase the whitaker. The lionello opalise the ernesta. The lionello is peruked. The lionello is secular. The lionello is not maximising. The lionello protect the whitaker. The lionello does not need the ernesta. The ernesta opalise the lionello. The ernesta append the whitaker. The ernesta is not peruked. The ernesta protect the lionello. If something opalise the ernesta and it protect the lionello then the ernesta protect the whitaker. If something append the whitaker and it is not peruked then it protect the ernesta. If something is secular then it protect the lionello. If something protect the whitaker and it protect the lionello then it does not eat the lionello. If something opalise the lionello and it is not maximising then the lionello does not need the whitaker. If the whitaker is jangling and the whitaker does not need the lionello then the lionello protect the whitaker. The whitaker protect the ernesta.", "logic": "\nnot Opalise(whitaker, ernesta)\nnot Opalise(lionello, whitaker)\nOpalise(lionello, ernesta)\nPeruked(lionello)\nSecular(lionello)\nnot Maximising(lionello)\nProtect(lionello, whitaker)\nnot Protect(lionello, ernesta)\nOpalise(ernesta, lionello)\nAppend(ernesta, whitaker)\nnot Peruked(ernesta)\nProtect(ernesta, lionello)\nforall x (Opalise(x, ernesta) and Protect(x, lionello) -> Protect(ernesta, whitaker))\nforall x (Append(x, whitaker) and not Peruked(x) -> Protect(x, ernesta))\nforall x (Secular(x) -> Protect(x, lionello))\nforall x (Protect(x, whitaker) and Protect(x, lionello) -> not Append(x, lionello))\nforall x (Opalise(x, lionello) and not Maximising(x) -> not Protect(lionello, whitaker))\nJangling(whitaker) and not Protect(whitaker, lionello) -> Protect(lionello, whitaker)\n\nProtect(whitaker, ernesta)\n\nforall x (Append(x, whitaker) and not Peruked(x) -> Protect(x, ernesta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The clerissa does not chase the markus. The trish does not chase the clerissa. The trish apostatise the markus. The trish is majestic. The trish is rectal. The trish is not bilabial. The trish picket the clerissa. The trish does not need the markus. The markus apostatise the trish. The markus rein the clerissa. The markus is not majestic. The markus picket the trish. If something apostatise the markus and it picket the trish then the markus picket the clerissa. If something rein the clerissa and it is not majestic then it picket the markus. If something is rectal then it picket the trish. If something picket the clerissa and it picket the trish then it does not eat the trish. If something apostatise the trish and it is not bilabial then the trish does not need the clerissa. If the clerissa is choppy and the clerissa does not need the trish then the trish picket the clerissa. The clerissa is not majestic.", "logic": "\nnot Apostatise(clerissa, markus)\nnot Apostatise(trish, clerissa)\nApostatise(trish, markus)\nMajestic(trish)\nRectal(trish)\nnot Bilabial(trish)\nPicket(trish, clerissa)\nnot Picket(trish, markus)\nApostatise(markus, trish)\nRein(markus, clerissa)\nnot Majestic(markus)\nPicket(markus, trish)\nforall x (Apostatise(x, markus) and Picket(x, trish) -> Picket(markus, clerissa))\nforall x (Rein(x, clerissa) and not Majestic(x) -> Picket(x, markus))\nforall x (Rectal(x) -> Picket(x, trish))\nforall x (Picket(x, clerissa) and Picket(x, trish) -> not Rein(x, trish))\nforall x (Apostatise(x, trish) and not Bilabial(x) -> not Picket(trish, clerissa))\nChoppy(clerissa) and not Picket(clerissa, trish) -> Picket(trish, clerissa)\n\nnot Majestic(clerissa)\n\nnot Majestic(clerissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The faustina does not chase the rube. The carmita does not chase the faustina. The carmita overboil the rube. The carmita is knowable. The carmita is unilateral. The carmita is not ambient. The carmita fantasise the faustina. The carmita does not need the rube. The rube overboil the carmita. The rube angulate the faustina. The rube is not knowable. The rube fantasise the carmita. If something overboil the rube and it fantasise the carmita then the rube fantasise the faustina. If something angulate the faustina and it is not knowable then it fantasise the rube. If something is unilateral then it fantasise the carmita. If something fantasise the faustina and it fantasise the carmita then it does not eat the carmita. If something overboil the carmita and it is not ambient then the carmita does not need the faustina. If the faustina is cxxxv and the faustina does not need the carmita then the carmita fantasise the faustina. The faustina overboil the faustina.", "logic": "\nnot Overboil(faustina, rube)\nnot Overboil(carmita, faustina)\nOverboil(carmita, rube)\nKnowable(carmita)\nUnilateral(carmita)\nnot Ambient(carmita)\nFantasise(carmita, faustina)\nnot Fantasise(carmita, rube)\nOverboil(rube, carmita)\nAngulate(rube, faustina)\nnot Knowable(rube)\nFantasise(rube, carmita)\nforall x (Overboil(x, rube) and Fantasise(x, carmita) -> Fantasise(rube, faustina))\nforall x (Angulate(x, faustina) and not Knowable(x) -> Fantasise(x, rube))\nforall x (Unilateral(x) -> Fantasise(x, carmita))\nforall x (Fantasise(x, faustina) and Fantasise(x, carmita) -> not Angulate(x, carmita))\nforall x (Overboil(x, carmita) and not Ambient(x) -> not Fantasise(carmita, faustina))\nCxxxv(faustina) and not Fantasise(faustina, carmita) -> Fantasise(carmita, faustina)\n\nOverboil(faustina, faustina)\n\nOverboil(faustina, faustina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The venus does not chase the kaile. The jobye does not chase the venus. The jobye cooper the kaile. The jobye is clitoral. The jobye is unfit. The jobye is not plumbous. The jobye fathom the venus. The jobye does not need the kaile. The kaile cooper the jobye. The kaile channelize the venus. The kaile is not clitoral. The kaile fathom the jobye. If something cooper the kaile and it fathom the jobye then the kaile fathom the venus. If something channelize the venus and it is not clitoral then it fathom the kaile. If something is unfit then it fathom the jobye. If something fathom the venus and it fathom the jobye then it does not eat the jobye. If something cooper the jobye and it is not plumbous then the jobye does not need the venus. If the venus is astomatal and the venus does not need the jobye then the jobye fathom the venus. The kaile does not chase the venus.", "logic": "\nnot Cooper(venus, kaile)\nnot Cooper(jobye, venus)\nCooper(jobye, kaile)\nClitoral(jobye)\nUnfit(jobye)\nnot Plumbous(jobye)\nFathom(jobye, venus)\nnot Fathom(jobye, kaile)\nCooper(kaile, jobye)\nChannelize(kaile, venus)\nnot Clitoral(kaile)\nFathom(kaile, jobye)\nforall x (Cooper(x, kaile) and Fathom(x, jobye) -> Fathom(kaile, venus))\nforall x (Channelize(x, venus) and not Clitoral(x) -> Fathom(x, kaile))\nforall x (Unfit(x) -> Fathom(x, jobye))\nforall x (Fathom(x, venus) and Fathom(x, jobye) -> not Channelize(x, jobye))\nforall x (Cooper(x, jobye) and not Plumbous(x) -> not Fathom(jobye, venus))\nAstomatal(venus) and not Fathom(venus, jobye) -> Fathom(jobye, venus)\n\nnot Cooper(kaile, venus)\n\nnot Cooper(kaile, venus) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The virgil does not chase the jelene. The mickey does not chase the virgil. The mickey herd the jelene. The mickey is hotheaded. The mickey is temperate. The mickey is not leakproof. The mickey fend the virgil. The mickey does not need the jelene. The jelene herd the mickey. The jelene cuff the virgil. The jelene is not hotheaded. The jelene fend the mickey. If something herd the jelene and it fend the mickey then the jelene fend the virgil. If something cuff the virgil and it is not hotheaded then it fend the jelene. If something is temperate then it fend the mickey. If something fend the virgil and it fend the mickey then it does not eat the mickey. If something herd the mickey and it is not leakproof then the mickey does not need the virgil. If the virgil is soluble and the virgil does not need the mickey then the mickey fend the virgil. The virgil cuff the mickey.", "logic": "\nnot Herd(virgil, jelene)\nnot Herd(mickey, virgil)\nHerd(mickey, jelene)\nHotheaded(mickey)\nTemperate(mickey)\nnot Leakproof(mickey)\nFend(mickey, virgil)\nnot Fend(mickey, jelene)\nHerd(jelene, mickey)\nCuff(jelene, virgil)\nnot Hotheaded(jelene)\nFend(jelene, mickey)\nforall x (Herd(x, jelene) and Fend(x, mickey) -> Fend(jelene, virgil))\nforall x (Cuff(x, virgil) and not Hotheaded(x) -> Fend(x, jelene))\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Fend(x, mickey))\nforall x (Fend(x, virgil) and Fend(x, mickey) -> not Cuff(x, mickey))\nforall x (Herd(x, mickey) and not Leakproof(x) -> not Fend(mickey, virgil))\nSoluble(virgil) and not Fend(virgil, mickey) -> Fend(mickey, virgil)\n\nCuff(virgil, mickey)\n\nCuff(virgil, mickey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The myra does not chase the gaynor. The celine does not chase the myra. The celine impanel the gaynor. The celine is cetaceous. The celine is thoracic. The celine is not cute. The celine cocainise the myra. The celine does not need the gaynor. The gaynor impanel the celine. The gaynor spud the myra. The gaynor is not cetaceous. The gaynor cocainise the celine. If something impanel the gaynor and it cocainise the celine then the gaynor cocainise the myra. If something spud the myra and it is not cetaceous then it cocainise the gaynor. If something is thoracic then it cocainise the celine. If something cocainise the myra and it cocainise the celine then it does not eat the celine. If something impanel the celine and it is not cute then the celine does not need the myra. If the myra is little and the myra does not need the celine then the celine cocainise the myra. The myra does not eat the gaynor.", "logic": "\nnot Impanel(myra, gaynor)\nnot Impanel(celine, myra)\nImpanel(celine, gaynor)\nCetaceous(celine)\nThoracic(celine)\nnot Cute(celine)\nCocainise(celine, myra)\nnot Cocainise(celine, gaynor)\nImpanel(gaynor, celine)\nSpud(gaynor, myra)\nnot Cetaceous(gaynor)\nCocainise(gaynor, celine)\nforall x (Impanel(x, gaynor) and Cocainise(x, celine) -> Cocainise(gaynor, myra))\nforall x (Spud(x, myra) and not Cetaceous(x) -> Cocainise(x, gaynor))\nforall x (Thoracic(x) -> Cocainise(x, celine))\nforall x (Cocainise(x, myra) and Cocainise(x, celine) -> not Spud(x, celine))\nforall x (Impanel(x, celine) and not Cute(x) -> not Cocainise(celine, myra))\nLittle(myra) and not Cocainise(myra, celine) -> Cocainise(celine, myra)\n\nnot Spud(myra, gaynor)\n\nnot Spud(myra, gaynor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The robinett does not chase the emmey. The addis does not chase the robinett. The addis state the emmey. The addis is stellate. The addis is troublous. The addis is not watertight. The addis nose the robinett. The addis does not need the emmey. The emmey state the addis. The emmey unmake the robinett. The emmey is not stellate. The emmey nose the addis. If something state the emmey and it nose the addis then the emmey nose the robinett. If something unmake the robinett and it is not stellate then it nose the emmey. If something is troublous then it nose the addis. If something nose the robinett and it nose the addis then it does not eat the addis. If something state the addis and it is not watertight then the addis does not need the robinett. If the robinett is optional and the robinett does not need the addis then the addis nose the robinett. The robinett state the addis.", "logic": "\nnot State(robinett, emmey)\nnot State(addis, robinett)\nState(addis, emmey)\nStellate(addis)\nTroublous(addis)\nnot Watertight(addis)\nNose(addis, robinett)\nnot Nose(addis, emmey)\nState(emmey, addis)\nUnmake(emmey, robinett)\nnot Stellate(emmey)\nNose(emmey, addis)\nforall x (State(x, emmey) and Nose(x, addis) -> Nose(emmey, robinett))\nforall x (Unmake(x, robinett) and not Stellate(x) -> Nose(x, emmey))\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> Nose(x, addis))\nforall x (Nose(x, robinett) and Nose(x, addis) -> not Unmake(x, addis))\nforall x (State(x, addis) and not Watertight(x) -> not Nose(addis, robinett))\nOptional(robinett) and not Nose(robinett, addis) -> Nose(addis, robinett)\n\nState(robinett, addis)\n\nState(robinett, addis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-464"} {"premises": "The tuck incense the ginelle. The kylie is bowleg. The ginelle is not unsown. If the ginelle does not like the tuck and the tuck does not visit the kylie then the tuck does not visit the ginelle. If something square the tuck then the tuck is dreamless. The ginelle is not unsown.", "logic": "\nIncense(tuck, ginelle)\nBowleg(kylie)\nnot Unsown(ginelle)\nnot Square(ginelle, tuck) and not Incense(tuck, kylie) -> not Incense(tuck, ginelle)\nforall x (Square(x, tuck) -> Dreamless(tuck))\n\nnot Unsown(ginelle)\n\ntherefore not Unsown(ginelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1661"} {"premises": "The belvia blitz the kara. The morgen is slurred. The kara is not partisan. If the kara does not like the belvia and the belvia does not visit the morgen then the belvia does not visit the kara. If something remount the belvia then the belvia is cockamamie. The morgen is not slurred.", "logic": "\nBlitz(belvia, kara)\nSlurred(morgen)\nnot Partisan(kara)\nnot Remount(kara, belvia) and not Blitz(belvia, morgen) -> not Blitz(belvia, kara)\nforall x (Remount(x, belvia) -> Cockamamie(belvia))\n\nnot Slurred(morgen)\n\ntherefore Slurred(morgen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1661"} {"premises": "The carolie shovel the rhona. The rufus is joyless. The rhona is not lxiv. If the rhona does not like the carolie and the carolie does not visit the rufus then the carolie does not visit the rhona. If something gibe the carolie then the carolie is offsides. The carolie is not offsides.", "logic": "\nShovel(carolie, rhona)\nJoyless(rufus)\nnot Lxiv(rhona)\nnot Gibe(rhona, carolie) and not Shovel(carolie, rufus) -> not Shovel(carolie, rhona)\nforall x (Gibe(x, carolie) -> Offsides(carolie))\n\nnot Offsides(carolie)\n\nforall x (Gibe(x, carolie) -> Offsides(carolie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1661"} {"premises": "The aprilette illuminate the lancelot. The stevena is rainproof. The lancelot is not handheld. If the lancelot does not like the aprilette and the aprilette does not visit the stevena then the aprilette does not visit the lancelot. If something lure the aprilette then the aprilette is blimpish. The aprilette needs the aprilette.", "logic": "\nIlluminate(aprilette, lancelot)\nRainproof(stevena)\nnot Handheld(lancelot)\nnot Lure(lancelot, aprilette) and not Illuminate(aprilette, stevena) -> not Illuminate(aprilette, lancelot)\nforall x (Lure(x, aprilette) -> Blimpish(aprilette))\n\nNeeds(aprilette, aprilette)\n\nNeeds(aprilette, aprilette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-1661"} {"premises": "Casi is sopranino. Simonne is aplacental. Marisa is periodic. Sher is sopranino. Big, owlish people are ghanian. If someone is ghanian then they are periodic. If someone is aplacental and ghanian then they are learned. If someone is sopranino then they are owlish. Round people are ghanian. Round, learned people are aplacental. Sher is sopranino.", "logic": "\nSopranino(casi)\nAplacental(simonne)\nPeriodic(marisa)\nSopranino(sher)\nforall x (Learned(x) and Owlish(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Ghanian(x) -> Periodic(x))\nforall x (Aplacental(x) and Ghanian(x) -> Learned(x))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) -> Owlish(x))\nforall x (Owlish(x) -> Ghanian(x))\nforall x (Owlish(x) and Learned(x) -> Aplacental(x))\n\nSopranino(sher)\n\ntherefore Sopranino(sher)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Mohammed is pellucid. Adolpho is irrelevant. Nicola is hexagonal. Merla is pellucid. Big, ruminant people are porticoed. If someone is porticoed then they are hexagonal. If someone is irrelevant and porticoed then they are elliptic. If someone is pellucid then they are ruminant. Round people are porticoed. Round, elliptic people are irrelevant. Adolpho is not irrelevant.", "logic": "\nPellucid(mohammed)\nIrrelevant(adolpho)\nHexagonal(nicola)\nPellucid(merla)\nforall x (Elliptic(x) and Ruminant(x) -> Porticoed(x))\nforall x (Porticoed(x) -> Hexagonal(x))\nforall x (Irrelevant(x) and Porticoed(x) -> Elliptic(x))\nforall x (Pellucid(x) -> Ruminant(x))\nforall x (Ruminant(x) -> Porticoed(x))\nforall x (Ruminant(x) and Elliptic(x) -> Irrelevant(x))\n\nnot Irrelevant(adolpho)\n\ntherefore Irrelevant(adolpho)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Windy is involute. Odetta is unwounded. Germana is boned. Kirstin is involute. Big, mineral people are reclaimed. If someone is reclaimed then they are boned. If someone is unwounded and reclaimed then they are binding. If someone is involute then they are mineral. Round people are reclaimed. Round, binding people are unwounded. Windy is mineral.", "logic": "\nInvolute(windy)\nUnwounded(odetta)\nBoned(germana)\nInvolute(kirstin)\nforall x (Binding(x) and Mineral(x) -> Reclaimed(x))\nforall x (Reclaimed(x) -> Boned(x))\nforall x (Unwounded(x) and Reclaimed(x) -> Binding(x))\nforall x (Involute(x) -> Mineral(x))\nforall x (Mineral(x) -> Reclaimed(x))\nforall x (Mineral(x) and Binding(x) -> Unwounded(x))\n\nMineral(windy)\n\nInvolute(windy) and forall x (Involute(x) -> Mineral(x)) -> therefore Mineral(windy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Rici is unary. Elsa is xiii. Greg is carmelite. Sande is unary. Big, grassy people are humid. If someone is humid then they are carmelite. If someone is xiii and humid then they are effulgent. If someone is unary then they are grassy. Round people are humid. Round, effulgent people are xiii. Rici is not grassy.", "logic": "\nUnary(rici)\nXiii(elsa)\nCarmelite(greg)\nUnary(sande)\nforall x (Effulgent(x) and Grassy(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Humid(x) -> Carmelite(x))\nforall x (Xiii(x) and Humid(x) -> Effulgent(x))\nforall x (Unary(x) -> Grassy(x))\nforall x (Grassy(x) -> Humid(x))\nforall x (Grassy(x) and Effulgent(x) -> Xiii(x))\n\nnot Grassy(rici)\n\nUnary(rici) and forall x (Unary(x) -> Grassy(x)) -> therefore Grassy(rici)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Worden is barbadian. Lezlie is populous. Stephie is cuneiform. Carlota is barbadian. Big, offsides people are meshed. If someone is meshed then they are cuneiform. If someone is populous and meshed then they are defeasible. If someone is barbadian then they are offsides. Round people are meshed. Round, defeasible people are populous. Carlota is meshed.", "logic": "\nBarbadian(worden)\nPopulous(lezlie)\nCuneiform(stephie)\nBarbadian(carlota)\nforall x (Defeasible(x) and Offsides(x) -> Meshed(x))\nforall x (Meshed(x) -> Cuneiform(x))\nforall x (Populous(x) and Meshed(x) -> Defeasible(x))\nforall x (Barbadian(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Offsides(x) -> Meshed(x))\nforall x (Offsides(x) and Defeasible(x) -> Populous(x))\n\nMeshed(carlota)\n\nBarbadian(carlota) and forall x (Barbadian(x) -> Offsides(x)) -> therefore Offsides(carlota) Offsides(carlota) and forall x (Offsides(x) -> Meshed(x)) -> therefore Meshed(carlota)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Frederick is unattired. Walker is nippy. Koral is fuzzy. Jacquette is unattired. Big, burundi people are steamed. If someone is steamed then they are fuzzy. If someone is nippy and steamed then they are briery. If someone is unattired then they are burundi. Round people are steamed. Round, briery people are nippy. Jacquette is not steamed.", "logic": "\nUnattired(frederick)\nNippy(walker)\nFuzzy(koral)\nUnattired(jacquette)\nforall x (Briery(x) and Burundi(x) -> Steamed(x))\nforall x (Steamed(x) -> Fuzzy(x))\nforall x (Nippy(x) and Steamed(x) -> Briery(x))\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Burundi(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) -> Steamed(x))\nforall x (Burundi(x) and Briery(x) -> Nippy(x))\n\nnot Steamed(jacquette)\n\nUnattired(jacquette) and forall x (Unattired(x) -> Burundi(x)) -> therefore Burundi(jacquette) Burundi(jacquette) and forall x (Burundi(x) -> Steamed(x)) -> therefore Steamed(jacquette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Brandi is xxxv. Dickie is late. Nikkie is orientated. Dulce is xxxv. Big, albuminous people are parturient. If someone is parturient then they are orientated. If someone is late and parturient then they are brotherly. If someone is xxxv then they are albuminous. Round people are parturient. Round, brotherly people are late. Brandi is orientated.", "logic": "\nXxxv(brandi)\nLate(dickie)\nOrientated(nikkie)\nXxxv(dulce)\nforall x (Brotherly(x) and Albuminous(x) -> Parturient(x))\nforall x (Parturient(x) -> Orientated(x))\nforall x (Late(x) and Parturient(x) -> Brotherly(x))\nforall x (Xxxv(x) -> Albuminous(x))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) -> Parturient(x))\nforall x (Albuminous(x) and Brotherly(x) -> Late(x))\n\nOrientated(brandi)\n\nXxxv(brandi) and forall x (Xxxv(x) -> Albuminous(x)) -> therefore Albuminous(brandi) Albuminous(brandi) and forall x (Albuminous(x) -> Parturient(x)) -> therefore Parturient(brandi) Parturient(brandi) and forall x (Parturient(x) -> Orientated(x)) -> therefore Orientated(brandi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Maddalena is arrogant. Wilt is precordial. Jobye is anatomic. Sylvan is arrogant. Big, exploded people are anodyne. If someone is anodyne then they are anatomic. If someone is precordial and anodyne then they are bullish. If someone is arrogant then they are exploded. Round people are anodyne. Round, bullish people are precordial. Sylvan is not anatomic.", "logic": "\nArrogant(maddalena)\nPrecordial(wilt)\nAnatomic(jobye)\nArrogant(sylvan)\nforall x (Bullish(x) and Exploded(x) -> Anodyne(x))\nforall x (Anodyne(x) -> Anatomic(x))\nforall x (Precordial(x) and Anodyne(x) -> Bullish(x))\nforall x (Arrogant(x) -> Exploded(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) -> Anodyne(x))\nforall x (Exploded(x) and Bullish(x) -> Precordial(x))\n\nnot Anatomic(sylvan)\n\nArrogant(sylvan) and forall x (Arrogant(x) -> Exploded(x)) -> therefore Exploded(sylvan) Exploded(sylvan) and forall x (Exploded(x) -> Anodyne(x)) -> therefore Anodyne(sylvan) Anodyne(sylvan) and forall x (Anodyne(x) -> Anatomic(x)) -> therefore Anatomic(sylvan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Thaxter is inductive. Sonnnie is unwebbed. Halie is unstylish. Catlin is inductive. Big, musty people are trussed. If someone is trussed then they are unstylish. If someone is unwebbed and trussed then they are departed. If someone is inductive then they are musty. Round people are trussed. Round, departed people are unwebbed. Sonnnie is not musty.", "logic": "\nInductive(thaxter)\nUnwebbed(sonnnie)\nUnstylish(halie)\nInductive(catlin)\nforall x (Departed(x) and Musty(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Unstylish(x))\nforall x (Unwebbed(x) and Trussed(x) -> Departed(x))\nforall x (Inductive(x) -> Musty(x))\nforall x (Musty(x) -> Trussed(x))\nforall x (Musty(x) and Departed(x) -> Unwebbed(x))\n\nnot Musty(sonnnie)\n\nforall x (Inductive(x) -> Musty(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Luana is rootbound. Fabrianne is dogmatical. Sigrid is loco. Rhetta is rootbound. Big, going people are parhelic. If someone is parhelic then they are loco. If someone is dogmatical and parhelic then they are innovative. If someone is rootbound then they are going. Round people are parhelic. Round, innovative people are dogmatical. Rhetta is innovative.", "logic": "\nRootbound(luana)\nDogmatical(fabrianne)\nLoco(sigrid)\nRootbound(rhetta)\nforall x (Innovative(x) and Going(x) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (Parhelic(x) -> Loco(x))\nforall x (Dogmatical(x) and Parhelic(x) -> Innovative(x))\nforall x (Rootbound(x) -> Going(x))\nforall x (Going(x) -> Parhelic(x))\nforall x (Going(x) and Innovative(x) -> Dogmatical(x))\n\nInnovative(rhetta)\n\nforall x (Dogmatical(x) and Parhelic(x) -> Innovative(x)) <- forall x (Going(x) and Innovative(x) -> Dogmatical(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Thom is homicidal. Eben is pencilled. Ianthe is chanceful. Olimpia is homicidal. Big, agitated people are repetitive. If someone is repetitive then they are chanceful. If someone is pencilled and repetitive then they are tasseled. If someone is homicidal then they are agitated. Round people are repetitive. Round, tasseled people are pencilled. Ianthe is not repetitive.", "logic": "\nHomicidal(thom)\nPencilled(eben)\nChanceful(ianthe)\nHomicidal(olimpia)\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Agitated(x) -> Repetitive(x))\nforall x (Repetitive(x) -> Chanceful(x))\nforall x (Pencilled(x) and Repetitive(x) -> Tasseled(x))\nforall x (Homicidal(x) -> Agitated(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) -> Repetitive(x))\nforall x (Agitated(x) and Tasseled(x) -> Pencilled(x))\n\nnot Repetitive(ianthe)\n\nforall x (Tasseled(x) and Agitated(x) -> Repetitive(x)) <- forall x (Homicidal(x) -> Agitated(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Bridgett is radio. Heywood is semiliquid. Cara is adventive. Korie is radio. Big, allelic people are inartistic. If someone is inartistic then they are adventive. If someone is semiliquid and inartistic then they are arteriolar. If someone is radio then they are allelic. Round people are inartistic. Round, arteriolar people are semiliquid. Cara is arteriolar.", "logic": "\nRadio(bridgett)\nSemiliquid(heywood)\nAdventive(cara)\nRadio(korie)\nforall x (Arteriolar(x) and Allelic(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Inartistic(x) -> Adventive(x))\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Inartistic(x) -> Arteriolar(x))\nforall x (Radio(x) -> Allelic(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) -> Inartistic(x))\nforall x (Allelic(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Semiliquid(x))\n\nArteriolar(cara)\n\nforall x (Semiliquid(x) and Inartistic(x) -> Arteriolar(x)) <- forall x (Allelic(x) and Arteriolar(x) -> Semiliquid(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Merlina is hempen. Nerte is roomy. Gunther is stingless. Chrystal is hempen. Big, sporadic people are abactinal. If someone is abactinal then they are stingless. If someone is roomy and abactinal then they are politic. If someone is hempen then they are sporadic. Round people are abactinal. Round, politic people are roomy. Nerte is not hempen.", "logic": "\nHempen(merlina)\nRoomy(nerte)\nStingless(gunther)\nHempen(chrystal)\nforall x (Politic(x) and Sporadic(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Abactinal(x) -> Stingless(x))\nforall x (Roomy(x) and Abactinal(x) -> Politic(x))\nforall x (Hempen(x) -> Sporadic(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Sporadic(x) and Politic(x) -> Roomy(x))\n\nnot Hempen(nerte)\n\nnot Hempen(nerte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Margeaux is through. Nathalia is benzoic. Rodolphe is unendowed. Dareen is through. Big, viewless people are baseborn. If someone is baseborn then they are unendowed. If someone is benzoic and baseborn then they are pivotal. If someone is through then they are viewless. Round people are baseborn. Round, pivotal people are benzoic. Margeaux is cold.", "logic": "\nThrough(margeaux)\nBenzoic(nathalia)\nUnendowed(rodolphe)\nThrough(dareen)\nforall x (Pivotal(x) and Viewless(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Baseborn(x) -> Unendowed(x))\nforall x (Benzoic(x) and Baseborn(x) -> Pivotal(x))\nforall x (Through(x) -> Viewless(x))\nforall x (Viewless(x) -> Baseborn(x))\nforall x (Viewless(x) and Pivotal(x) -> Benzoic(x))\n\nCold(margeaux)\n\nCold(margeaux) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Albina is filar. Tammara is phrenetic. Lilias is incumbent. Raf is filar. Big, forcible people are despairing. If someone is despairing then they are incumbent. If someone is phrenetic and despairing then they are shambolic. If someone is filar then they are forcible. Round people are despairing. Round, shambolic people are phrenetic. Tammara is not cold.", "logic": "\nFilar(albina)\nPhrenetic(tammara)\nIncumbent(lilias)\nFilar(raf)\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Forcible(x) -> Despairing(x))\nforall x (Despairing(x) -> Incumbent(x))\nforall x (Phrenetic(x) and Despairing(x) -> Shambolic(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) -> Forcible(x))\nforall x (Forcible(x) -> Despairing(x))\nforall x (Forcible(x) and Shambolic(x) -> Phrenetic(x))\n\nnot Cold(tammara)\n\nnot Cold(tammara) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Idaline is thornless. Halvard is nonlexical. Cammi is alkaloidal. Codee is thornless. Big, bruising people are heuristic. If someone is heuristic then they are alkaloidal. If someone is nonlexical and heuristic then they are astonished. If someone is thornless then they are bruising. Round people are heuristic. Round, astonished people are nonlexical. Codee is cold.", "logic": "\nThornless(idaline)\nNonlexical(halvard)\nAlkaloidal(cammi)\nThornless(codee)\nforall x (Astonished(x) and Bruising(x) -> Heuristic(x))\nforall x (Heuristic(x) -> Alkaloidal(x))\nforall x (Nonlexical(x) and Heuristic(x) -> Astonished(x))\nforall x (Thornless(x) -> Bruising(x))\nforall x (Bruising(x) -> Heuristic(x))\nforall x (Bruising(x) and Astonished(x) -> Nonlexical(x))\n\nCold(codee)\n\nCold(codee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1433"} {"premises": "Anet is faceless. Davine is unseeyn. Davine is midmost. Davine is not durable. Isador is unseeyn. Isador is not durable. Isador is uraemic. If something is faceless then it is durable. If Anet is potty then Anet is uraemic. All durable things are corked. If Davine is midmost then Davine is uraemic. All corked things are midmost. If something is uraemic and not durable then it is midmost. Isador is uraemic.", "logic": "\nFaceless(anet)\nUnseeyn(davine)\nMidmost(davine)\nnot Durable(davine)\nUnseeyn(isador)\nnot Durable(isador)\nUraemic(isador)\nforall x (Faceless(x) -> Durable(x))\nPotty(anet) -> Uraemic(anet)\nforall x (Durable(x) -> Corked(x))\nMidmost(davine) -> Uraemic(davine)\nforall x (Corked(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Uraemic(x) and not Durable(x) -> Midmost(x))\n\nUraemic(isador)\n\ntherefore Uraemic(isador)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Mitchell is immobile. Romola is mutable. Romola is deboned. Romola is not unlikable. Portia is mutable. Portia is not unlikable. Portia is foregoing. If something is immobile then it is unlikable. If Mitchell is home then Mitchell is foregoing. All unlikable things are apivorous. If Romola is deboned then Romola is foregoing. All apivorous things are deboned. If something is foregoing and not unlikable then it is deboned. Romola is unlikable.", "logic": "\nImmobile(mitchell)\nMutable(romola)\nDeboned(romola)\nnot Unlikable(romola)\nMutable(portia)\nnot Unlikable(portia)\nForegoing(portia)\nforall x (Immobile(x) -> Unlikable(x))\nHome(mitchell) -> Foregoing(mitchell)\nforall x (Unlikable(x) -> Apivorous(x))\nDeboned(romola) -> Foregoing(romola)\nforall x (Apivorous(x) -> Deboned(x))\nforall x (Foregoing(x) and not Unlikable(x) -> Deboned(x))\n\nUnlikable(romola)\n\ntherefore not Unlikable(romola)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Xenos is brief. Rosemaria is almighty. Rosemaria is eremitic. Rosemaria is not hushed. Benedetta is almighty. Benedetta is not hushed. Benedetta is lithuanian. If something is brief then it is hushed. If Xenos is welsh then Xenos is lithuanian. All hushed things are unwoven. If Rosemaria is eremitic then Rosemaria is lithuanian. All unwoven things are eremitic. If something is lithuanian and not hushed then it is eremitic. Rosemaria is lithuanian.", "logic": "\nBrief(xenos)\nAlmighty(rosemaria)\nEremitic(rosemaria)\nnot Hushed(rosemaria)\nAlmighty(benedetta)\nnot Hushed(benedetta)\nLithuanian(benedetta)\nforall x (Brief(x) -> Hushed(x))\nWelsh(xenos) -> Lithuanian(xenos)\nforall x (Hushed(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nEremitic(rosemaria) -> Lithuanian(rosemaria)\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> Eremitic(x))\nforall x (Lithuanian(x) and not Hushed(x) -> Eremitic(x))\n\nLithuanian(rosemaria)\n\nEremitic(rosemaria) and Eremitic(rosemaria) -> Lithuanian(rosemaria) -> therefore Lithuanian(rosemaria)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Wolfy is pentagonal. Zandra is sightly. Zandra is prolusory. Zandra is not rugose. Rosemonde is sightly. Rosemonde is not rugose. Rosemonde is guileless. If something is pentagonal then it is rugose. If Wolfy is costate then Wolfy is guileless. All rugose things are nonspatial. If Zandra is prolusory then Zandra is guileless. All nonspatial things are prolusory. If something is guileless and not rugose then it is prolusory. Rosemonde is not prolusory.", "logic": "\nPentagonal(wolfy)\nSightly(zandra)\nProlusory(zandra)\nnot Rugose(zandra)\nSightly(rosemonde)\nnot Rugose(rosemonde)\nGuileless(rosemonde)\nforall x (Pentagonal(x) -> Rugose(x))\nCostate(wolfy) -> Guileless(wolfy)\nforall x (Rugose(x) -> Nonspatial(x))\nProlusory(zandra) -> Guileless(zandra)\nforall x (Nonspatial(x) -> Prolusory(x))\nforall x (Guileless(x) and not Rugose(x) -> Prolusory(x))\n\nnot Prolusory(rosemonde)\n\nGuileless(rosemonde) and not Rugose(rosemonde) and forall x (Guileless(x) and not Rugose(x) -> Prolusory(x)) -> therefore Prolusory(rosemonde)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Cathe is edwardian. Osborn is liberated. Osborn is embonpoint. Osborn is not neoliberal. Aloise is liberated. Aloise is not neoliberal. Aloise is vermillion. If something is edwardian then it is neoliberal. If Cathe is baritone then Cathe is vermillion. All neoliberal things are confirming. If Osborn is embonpoint then Osborn is vermillion. All confirming things are embonpoint. If something is vermillion and not neoliberal then it is embonpoint. Cathe is confirming.", "logic": "\nEdwardian(cathe)\nLiberated(osborn)\nEmbonpoint(osborn)\nnot Neoliberal(osborn)\nLiberated(aloise)\nnot Neoliberal(aloise)\nVermillion(aloise)\nforall x (Edwardian(x) -> Neoliberal(x))\nBaritone(cathe) -> Vermillion(cathe)\nforall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Confirming(x))\nEmbonpoint(osborn) -> Vermillion(osborn)\nforall x (Confirming(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\nforall x (Vermillion(x) and not Neoliberal(x) -> Embonpoint(x))\n\nConfirming(cathe)\n\nEdwardian(cathe) and forall x (Edwardian(x) -> Neoliberal(x)) -> therefore Neoliberal(cathe) Neoliberal(cathe) and forall x (Neoliberal(x) -> Confirming(x)) -> therefore Confirming(cathe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Klaus is franciscan. Olag is beninese. Olag is slight. Olag is not mislabeled. Darien is beninese. Darien is not mislabeled. Darien is collagenic. If something is franciscan then it is mislabeled. If Klaus is played then Klaus is collagenic. All mislabeled things are bumbling. If Olag is slight then Olag is collagenic. All bumbling things are slight. If something is collagenic and not mislabeled then it is slight. Klaus is not bumbling.", "logic": "\nFranciscan(klaus)\nBeninese(olag)\nSlight(olag)\nnot Mislabeled(olag)\nBeninese(darien)\nnot Mislabeled(darien)\nCollagenic(darien)\nforall x (Franciscan(x) -> Mislabeled(x))\nPlayed(klaus) -> Collagenic(klaus)\nforall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Bumbling(x))\nSlight(olag) -> Collagenic(olag)\nforall x (Bumbling(x) -> Slight(x))\nforall x (Collagenic(x) and not Mislabeled(x) -> Slight(x))\n\nnot Bumbling(klaus)\n\nFranciscan(klaus) and forall x (Franciscan(x) -> Mislabeled(x)) -> therefore Mislabeled(klaus) Mislabeled(klaus) and forall x (Mislabeled(x) -> Bumbling(x)) -> therefore Bumbling(klaus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Adah is employable. James is rhapsodic. James is immutable. James is not orbital. Lemmie is rhapsodic. Lemmie is not orbital. Lemmie is motivative. If something is employable then it is orbital. If Adah is menstrual then Adah is motivative. All orbital things are immoral. If James is immutable then James is motivative. All immoral things are immutable. If something is motivative and not orbital then it is immutable. Adah is immutable.", "logic": "\nEmployable(adah)\nRhapsodic(james)\nImmutable(james)\nnot Orbital(james)\nRhapsodic(lemmie)\nnot Orbital(lemmie)\nMotivative(lemmie)\nforall x (Employable(x) -> Orbital(x))\nMenstrual(adah) -> Motivative(adah)\nforall x (Orbital(x) -> Immoral(x))\nImmutable(james) -> Motivative(james)\nforall x (Immoral(x) -> Immutable(x))\nforall x (Motivative(x) and not Orbital(x) -> Immutable(x))\n\nImmutable(adah)\n\nEmployable(adah) and forall x (Employable(x) -> Orbital(x)) -> therefore Orbital(adah) Orbital(adah) and forall x (Orbital(x) -> Immoral(x)) -> therefore Immoral(adah) Immoral(adah) and forall x (Immoral(x) -> Immutable(x)) -> therefore Immutable(adah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Inge is plundering. Mellicent is batty. Mellicent is lunar. Mellicent is not sinistral. Valera is batty. Valera is not sinistral. Valera is aroused. If something is plundering then it is sinistral. If Inge is rational then Inge is aroused. All sinistral things are wrong. If Mellicent is lunar then Mellicent is aroused. All wrong things are lunar. If something is aroused and not sinistral then it is lunar. Inge is not lunar.", "logic": "\nPlundering(inge)\nBatty(mellicent)\nLunar(mellicent)\nnot Sinistral(mellicent)\nBatty(valera)\nnot Sinistral(valera)\nAroused(valera)\nforall x (Plundering(x) -> Sinistral(x))\nRational(inge) -> Aroused(inge)\nforall x (Sinistral(x) -> Wrong(x))\nLunar(mellicent) -> Aroused(mellicent)\nforall x (Wrong(x) -> Lunar(x))\nforall x (Aroused(x) and not Sinistral(x) -> Lunar(x))\n\nnot Lunar(inge)\n\nPlundering(inge) and forall x (Plundering(x) -> Sinistral(x)) -> therefore Sinistral(inge) Sinistral(inge) and forall x (Sinistral(x) -> Wrong(x)) -> therefore Wrong(inge) Wrong(inge) and forall x (Wrong(x) -> Lunar(x)) -> therefore Lunar(inge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Ofella is windburned. Mitch is extensible. Mitch is eucaryotic. Mitch is not mesmerised. Ruthy is extensible. Ruthy is not mesmerised. Ruthy is denotive. If something is windburned then it is mesmerised. If Ofella is dyspneic then Ofella is denotive. All mesmerised things are duckbill. If Mitch is eucaryotic then Mitch is denotive. All duckbill things are eucaryotic. If something is denotive and not mesmerised then it is eucaryotic. Mitch is not duckbill.", "logic": "\nWindburned(ofella)\nExtensible(mitch)\nEucaryotic(mitch)\nnot Mesmerised(mitch)\nExtensible(ruthy)\nnot Mesmerised(ruthy)\nDenotive(ruthy)\nforall x (Windburned(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\nDyspneic(ofella) -> Denotive(ofella)\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> Duckbill(x))\nEucaryotic(mitch) -> Denotive(mitch)\nforall x (Duckbill(x) -> Eucaryotic(x))\nforall x (Denotive(x) and not Mesmerised(x) -> Eucaryotic(x))\n\nnot Duckbill(mitch)\n\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> Duckbill(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Kalindi is homesick. Rebeka is unrefined. Rebeka is cylindric. Rebeka is not hominine. Aurelie is unrefined. Aurelie is not hominine. Aurelie is actinic. If something is homesick then it is hominine. If Kalindi is lenten then Kalindi is actinic. All hominine things are grecian. If Rebeka is cylindric then Rebeka is actinic. All grecian things are cylindric. If something is actinic and not hominine then it is cylindric. Aurelie is grecian.", "logic": "\nHomesick(kalindi)\nUnrefined(rebeka)\nCylindric(rebeka)\nnot Hominine(rebeka)\nUnrefined(aurelie)\nnot Hominine(aurelie)\nActinic(aurelie)\nforall x (Homesick(x) -> Hominine(x))\nLenten(kalindi) -> Actinic(kalindi)\nforall x (Hominine(x) -> Grecian(x))\nCylindric(rebeka) -> Actinic(rebeka)\nforall x (Grecian(x) -> Cylindric(x))\nforall x (Actinic(x) and not Hominine(x) -> Cylindric(x))\n\nGrecian(aurelie)\n\nforall x (Hominine(x) -> Grecian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Nadya is mutant. Ibbie is potent. Ibbie is inarguable. Ibbie is not auric. Lane is potent. Lane is not auric. Lane is corded. If something is mutant then it is auric. If Nadya is threaded then Nadya is corded. All auric things are steadying. If Ibbie is inarguable then Ibbie is corded. All steadying things are inarguable. If something is corded and not auric then it is inarguable. Nadya is not corded.", "logic": "\nMutant(nadya)\nPotent(ibbie)\nInarguable(ibbie)\nnot Auric(ibbie)\nPotent(lane)\nnot Auric(lane)\nCorded(lane)\nforall x (Mutant(x) -> Auric(x))\nThreaded(nadya) -> Corded(nadya)\nforall x (Auric(x) -> Steadying(x))\nInarguable(ibbie) -> Corded(ibbie)\nforall x (Steadying(x) -> Inarguable(x))\nforall x (Corded(x) and not Auric(x) -> Inarguable(x))\n\nnot Corded(nadya)\n\nThreaded(nadya) -> Corded(nadya) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Pollyanna is jittering. Flory is madagascan. Flory is downright. Flory is not macabre. Harvey is madagascan. Harvey is not macabre. Harvey is brusk. If something is jittering then it is macabre. If Pollyanna is disgusting then Pollyanna is brusk. All macabre things are crested. If Flory is downright then Flory is brusk. All crested things are downright. If something is brusk and not macabre then it is downright. Pollyanna is disgusting.", "logic": "\nJittering(pollyanna)\nMadagascan(flory)\nDownright(flory)\nnot Macabre(flory)\nMadagascan(harvey)\nnot Macabre(harvey)\nBrusk(harvey)\nforall x (Jittering(x) -> Macabre(x))\nDisgusting(pollyanna) -> Brusk(pollyanna)\nforall x (Macabre(x) -> Crested(x))\nDownright(flory) -> Brusk(flory)\nforall x (Crested(x) -> Downright(x))\nforall x (Brusk(x) and not Macabre(x) -> Downright(x))\n\nDisgusting(pollyanna)\n\nDisgusting(pollyanna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Danna is petalless. Leeann is antlered. Leeann is inviolable. Leeann is not deliberate. Taffy is antlered. Taffy is not deliberate. Taffy is compact. If something is petalless then it is deliberate. If Danna is titular then Danna is compact. All deliberate things are pedestrian. If Leeann is inviolable then Leeann is compact. All pedestrian things are inviolable. If something is compact and not deliberate then it is inviolable. Leeann is not petalless.", "logic": "\nPetalless(danna)\nAntlered(leeann)\nInviolable(leeann)\nnot Deliberate(leeann)\nAntlered(taffy)\nnot Deliberate(taffy)\nCompact(taffy)\nforall x (Petalless(x) -> Deliberate(x))\nTitular(danna) -> Compact(danna)\nforall x (Deliberate(x) -> Pedestrian(x))\nInviolable(leeann) -> Compact(leeann)\nforall x (Pedestrian(x) -> Inviolable(x))\nforall x (Compact(x) and not Deliberate(x) -> Inviolable(x))\n\nnot Petalless(leeann)\n\nnot Petalless(leeann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Sharlene is tonguelike. Mag is unquiet. Mag is ismaili. Mag is not ignescent. Martita is unquiet. Martita is not ignescent. Martita is acropetal. If something is tonguelike then it is ignescent. If Sharlene is slumbrous then Sharlene is acropetal. All ignescent things are purposeful. If Mag is ismaili then Mag is acropetal. All purposeful things are ismaili. If something is acropetal and not ignescent then it is ismaili. Martita is slumbrous.", "logic": "\nTonguelike(sharlene)\nUnquiet(mag)\nIsmaili(mag)\nnot Ignescent(mag)\nUnquiet(martita)\nnot Ignescent(martita)\nAcropetal(martita)\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) -> Ignescent(x))\nSlumbrous(sharlene) -> Acropetal(sharlene)\nforall x (Ignescent(x) -> Purposeful(x))\nIsmaili(mag) -> Acropetal(mag)\nforall x (Purposeful(x) -> Ismaili(x))\nforall x (Acropetal(x) and not Ignescent(x) -> Ismaili(x))\n\nSlumbrous(martita)\n\nSlumbrous(martita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Fabrice is perfect. Kimball is seagoing. Kimball is boneless. Kimball is not sanctioned. Korella is seagoing. Korella is not sanctioned. Korella is biannual. If something is perfect then it is sanctioned. If Fabrice is masterful then Fabrice is biannual. All sanctioned things are polyphase. If Kimball is boneless then Kimball is biannual. All polyphase things are boneless. If something is biannual and not sanctioned then it is boneless. Korella is not perfect.", "logic": "\nPerfect(fabrice)\nSeagoing(kimball)\nBoneless(kimball)\nnot Sanctioned(kimball)\nSeagoing(korella)\nnot Sanctioned(korella)\nBiannual(korella)\nforall x (Perfect(x) -> Sanctioned(x))\nMasterful(fabrice) -> Biannual(fabrice)\nforall x (Sanctioned(x) -> Polyphase(x))\nBoneless(kimball) -> Biannual(kimball)\nforall x (Polyphase(x) -> Boneless(x))\nforall x (Biannual(x) and not Sanctioned(x) -> Boneless(x))\n\nnot Perfect(korella)\n\nnot Perfect(korella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Starla is hibernal. Nana is minimum. Nana is peaceful. Nana is not unpleasing. Atalanta is minimum. Atalanta is not unpleasing. Atalanta is drilled. If something is hibernal then it is unpleasing. If Starla is through then Starla is drilled. All unpleasing things are petaloid. If Nana is peaceful then Nana is drilled. All petaloid things are peaceful. If something is drilled and not unpleasing then it is peaceful. Nana is through.", "logic": "\nHibernal(starla)\nMinimum(nana)\nPeaceful(nana)\nnot Unpleasing(nana)\nMinimum(atalanta)\nnot Unpleasing(atalanta)\nDrilled(atalanta)\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Unpleasing(x))\nThrough(starla) -> Drilled(starla)\nforall x (Unpleasing(x) -> Petaloid(x))\nPeaceful(nana) -> Drilled(nana)\nforall x (Petaloid(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Drilled(x) and not Unpleasing(x) -> Peaceful(x))\n\nThrough(nana)\n\nThrough(nana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1534"} {"premises": "Jessee is cityfied. All cityfied, unpurified people are portable. White, cityfied people are blotchy. If Jessee is cityfied and Jessee is topping then Jessee is portable. If someone is cityfied then they are unpurified. All topping, portable people are cityfied. If Jessee is portable and Jessee is curable then Jessee is tartarean. Jessee is cityfied.", "logic": "\nCityfied(jessee)\nforall x (Cityfied(x) and Unpurified(x) -> Portable(x))\nforall x (Unpurified(x) and Cityfied(x) -> Blotchy(x))\nCityfied(jessee) and Topping(jessee) -> Portable(jessee)\nforall x (Cityfied(x) -> Unpurified(x))\nforall x (Topping(x) and Portable(x) -> Cityfied(x))\nPortable(jessee) and Curable(jessee) -> Tartarean(jessee)\n\nCityfied(jessee)\n\ntherefore Cityfied(jessee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Skippy is unskillful. All unskillful, compressed people are guiding. White, unskillful people are aramaic. If Skippy is unskillful and Skippy is fastigiate then Skippy is guiding. If someone is unskillful then they are compressed. All fastigiate, guiding people are unskillful. If Skippy is guiding and Skippy is many then Skippy is potholed. Skippy is not unskillful.", "logic": "\nUnskillful(skippy)\nforall x (Unskillful(x) and Compressed(x) -> Guiding(x))\nforall x (Compressed(x) and Unskillful(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nUnskillful(skippy) and Fastigiate(skippy) -> Guiding(skippy)\nforall x (Unskillful(x) -> Compressed(x))\nforall x (Fastigiate(x) and Guiding(x) -> Unskillful(x))\nGuiding(skippy) and Many(skippy) -> Potholed(skippy)\n\nnot Unskillful(skippy)\n\ntherefore Unskillful(skippy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Cleopatra is revived. All revived, native people are essential. White, revived people are dateless. If Cleopatra is revived and Cleopatra is panicled then Cleopatra is essential. If someone is revived then they are native. All panicled, essential people are revived. If Cleopatra is essential and Cleopatra is dalmatian then Cleopatra is subsequent. Cleopatra is native.", "logic": "\nRevived(cleopatra)\nforall x (Revived(x) and Native(x) -> Essential(x))\nforall x (Native(x) and Revived(x) -> Dateless(x))\nRevived(cleopatra) and Panicled(cleopatra) -> Essential(cleopatra)\nforall x (Revived(x) -> Native(x))\nforall x (Panicled(x) and Essential(x) -> Revived(x))\nEssential(cleopatra) and Dalmatian(cleopatra) -> Subsequent(cleopatra)\n\nNative(cleopatra)\n\nRevived(cleopatra) and forall x (Revived(x) -> Native(x)) -> therefore Native(cleopatra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Adolphe is antitank. All antitank, homicidal people are delimited. White, antitank people are taxing. If Adolphe is antitank and Adolphe is valvular then Adolphe is delimited. If someone is antitank then they are homicidal. All valvular, delimited people are antitank. If Adolphe is delimited and Adolphe is theoretic then Adolphe is tapped. Adolphe is not homicidal.", "logic": "\nAntitank(adolphe)\nforall x (Antitank(x) and Homicidal(x) -> Delimited(x))\nforall x (Homicidal(x) and Antitank(x) -> Taxing(x))\nAntitank(adolphe) and Valvular(adolphe) -> Delimited(adolphe)\nforall x (Antitank(x) -> Homicidal(x))\nforall x (Valvular(x) and Delimited(x) -> Antitank(x))\nDelimited(adolphe) and Theoretic(adolphe) -> Tapped(adolphe)\n\nnot Homicidal(adolphe)\n\nAntitank(adolphe) and forall x (Antitank(x) -> Homicidal(x)) -> therefore Homicidal(adolphe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Logan is allegretto. All allegretto, astir people are innermost. White, allegretto people are amygdaloid. If Logan is allegretto and Logan is collected then Logan is innermost. If someone is allegretto then they are astir. All collected, innermost people are allegretto. If Logan is innermost and Logan is milklike then Logan is invariant. Logan is amygdaloid.", "logic": "\nAllegretto(logan)\nforall x (Allegretto(x) and Astir(x) -> Innermost(x))\nforall x (Astir(x) and Allegretto(x) -> Amygdaloid(x))\nAllegretto(logan) and Collected(logan) -> Innermost(logan)\nforall x (Allegretto(x) -> Astir(x))\nforall x (Collected(x) and Innermost(x) -> Allegretto(x))\nInnermost(logan) and Milklike(logan) -> Invariant(logan)\n\nAmygdaloid(logan)\n\nAllegretto(logan) and forall x (Allegretto(x) -> Astir(x)) -> therefore Astir(logan) Astir(logan) and Allegretto(logan) and forall x (Astir(x) and Allegretto(x) -> Amygdaloid(x)) -> therefore Amygdaloid(logan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Kaiser is bungled. All bungled, amethyst people are paranasal. White, bungled people are stomachic. If Kaiser is bungled and Kaiser is modern then Kaiser is paranasal. If someone is bungled then they are amethyst. All modern, paranasal people are bungled. If Kaiser is paranasal and Kaiser is baffling then Kaiser is genoese. Kaiser is not paranasal.", "logic": "\nBungled(kaiser)\nforall x (Bungled(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Paranasal(x))\nforall x (Amethyst(x) and Bungled(x) -> Stomachic(x))\nBungled(kaiser) and Modern(kaiser) -> Paranasal(kaiser)\nforall x (Bungled(x) -> Amethyst(x))\nforall x (Modern(x) and Paranasal(x) -> Bungled(x))\nParanasal(kaiser) and Baffling(kaiser) -> Genoese(kaiser)\n\nnot Paranasal(kaiser)\n\nBungled(kaiser) and forall x (Bungled(x) -> Amethyst(x)) -> therefore Amethyst(kaiser) Bungled(kaiser) and Amethyst(kaiser) and forall x (Bungled(x) and Amethyst(x) -> Paranasal(x)) -> therefore Paranasal(kaiser)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Kayley is succinct. All succinct, evanescent people are enmeshed. White, succinct people are blanket. If Kayley is succinct and Kayley is sopranino then Kayley is enmeshed. If someone is succinct then they are evanescent. All sopranino, enmeshed people are succinct. If Kayley is enmeshed and Kayley is reversed then Kayley is unrequited. Kayley is not unrequited.", "logic": "\nSuccinct(kayley)\nforall x (Succinct(x) and Evanescent(x) -> Enmeshed(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) and Succinct(x) -> Blanket(x))\nSuccinct(kayley) and Sopranino(kayley) -> Enmeshed(kayley)\nforall x (Succinct(x) -> Evanescent(x))\nforall x (Sopranino(x) and Enmeshed(x) -> Succinct(x))\nEnmeshed(kayley) and Reversed(kayley) -> Unrequited(kayley)\n\nnot Unrequited(kayley)\n\nEnmeshed(kayley) and Reversed(kayley) -> Unrequited(kayley) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "Myrah is excusatory. All excusatory, unwearying people are cxxv. White, excusatory people are cumulous. If Myrah is excusatory and Myrah is sagacious then Myrah is cxxv. If someone is excusatory then they are unwearying. All sagacious, cxxv people are excusatory. If Myrah is cxxv and Myrah is weary then Myrah is loath. Myrah is sagacious.", "logic": "\nExcusatory(myrah)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) and Unwearying(x) -> Cxxv(x))\nforall x (Unwearying(x) and Excusatory(x) -> Cumulous(x))\nExcusatory(myrah) and Sagacious(myrah) -> Cxxv(myrah)\nforall x (Excusatory(x) -> Unwearying(x))\nforall x (Sagacious(x) and Cxxv(x) -> Excusatory(x))\nCxxv(myrah) and Weary(myrah) -> Loath(myrah)\n\nSagacious(myrah)\n\nSagacious(myrah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-189"} {"premises": "The wolfram is bimodal. The wolfram is spotless. The wolfram is self. The wolfram is irascible. The wolfram troop the maggie. The wolfram does not see the maggie. The wolfram cornice the maggie. The maggie is bimodal. The maggie is spotless. The maggie is self. The maggie is unflavored. The maggie is irascible. The maggie troop the wolfram. The maggie does not see the wolfram. The maggie cornice the wolfram. If someone is spotless and they see the maggie then the maggie does not see the wolfram. If someone is self and they visit the maggie then the maggie is bimodal. If someone unearth the wolfram then they are not bimodal. If someone is irascible then they visit the wolfram. If someone is irascible then they do not see the maggie. If someone troop the maggie and they are not bimodal then the maggie does not visit the wolfram. If someone unearth the maggie and the maggie troop the wolfram then the wolfram does not like the maggie. If the maggie cornice the wolfram then the maggie troop the wolfram. The wolfram is irascible.", "logic": "\nBimodal(wolfram)\nSpotless(wolfram)\nSelf(wolfram)\nIrascible(wolfram)\nTroop(wolfram, maggie)\nnot Unearth(wolfram, maggie)\nCornice(wolfram, maggie)\nBimodal(maggie)\nSpotless(maggie)\nSelf(maggie)\nUnflavored(maggie)\nIrascible(maggie)\nTroop(maggie, wolfram)\nnot Unearth(maggie, wolfram)\nCornice(maggie, wolfram)\nforall x (Spotless(x) and Unearth(x, maggie) -> not Unearth(maggie, wolfram))\nforall x (Self(x) and Cornice(x, maggie) -> Bimodal(maggie))\nforall x (Unearth(x, wolfram) -> not Bimodal(x))\nforall x (Irascible(x) -> Cornice(x, wolfram))\nforall x (Irascible(x) -> not Unearth(x, maggie))\nforall x (Troop(x, maggie) and not Bimodal(x) -> not Cornice(maggie, wolfram))\nforall x (Unearth(x, maggie) and Troop(maggie, wolfram) -> not Troop(wolfram, maggie))\nCornice(maggie, wolfram) -> Troop(maggie, wolfram)\n\nIrascible(wolfram)\n\ntherefore Irascible(wolfram)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4491"} {"premises": "The daffi is fulgurant. The daffi is platelike. The daffi is botswanan. The daffi is healthier. The daffi tabulate the ame. The daffi does not see the ame. The daffi vulgarize the ame. The ame is fulgurant. The ame is platelike. The ame is botswanan. The ame is carious. The ame is healthier. The ame tabulate the daffi. The ame does not see the daffi. The ame vulgarize the daffi. If someone is platelike and they see the ame then the ame does not see the daffi. If someone is botswanan and they visit the ame then the ame is fulgurant. If someone embalm the daffi then they are not fulgurant. If someone is healthier then they visit the daffi. If someone is healthier then they do not see the ame. If someone tabulate the ame and they are not fulgurant then the ame does not visit the daffi. If someone embalm the ame and the ame tabulate the daffi then the daffi does not like the ame. If the ame vulgarize the daffi then the ame tabulate the daffi. The daffi is not healthier.", "logic": "\nFulgurant(daffi)\nPlatelike(daffi)\nBotswanan(daffi)\nHealthier(daffi)\nTabulate(daffi, ame)\nnot Embalm(daffi, ame)\nVulgarize(daffi, ame)\nFulgurant(ame)\nPlatelike(ame)\nBotswanan(ame)\nCarious(ame)\nHealthier(ame)\nTabulate(ame, daffi)\nnot Embalm(ame, daffi)\nVulgarize(ame, daffi)\nforall x (Platelike(x) and Embalm(x, ame) -> not Embalm(ame, daffi))\nforall x (Botswanan(x) and Vulgarize(x, ame) -> Fulgurant(ame))\nforall x (Embalm(x, daffi) -> not Fulgurant(x))\nforall x (Healthier(x) -> Vulgarize(x, daffi))\nforall x (Healthier(x) -> not Embalm(x, ame))\nforall x (Tabulate(x, ame) and not Fulgurant(x) -> not Vulgarize(ame, daffi))\nforall x (Embalm(x, ame) and Tabulate(ame, daffi) -> not Tabulate(daffi, ame))\nVulgarize(ame, daffi) -> Tabulate(ame, daffi)\n\nnot Healthier(daffi)\n\ntherefore Healthier(daffi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4491"} {"premises": "The bobby is humified. The bobby is phonic. The bobby is crinoid. The bobby is zapotec. The bobby background the bianca. The bobby does not see the bianca. The bobby ptyalize the bianca. The bianca is humified. The bianca is phonic. The bianca is crinoid. The bianca is tuneful. The bianca is zapotec. The bianca background the bobby. The bianca does not see the bobby. The bianca ptyalize the bobby. If someone is phonic and they see the bianca then the bianca does not see the bobby. If someone is crinoid and they visit the bianca then the bianca is humified. If someone comminate the bobby then they are not humified. If someone is zapotec then they visit the bobby. If someone is zapotec then they do not see the bianca. If someone background the bianca and they are not humified then the bianca does not visit the bobby. If someone comminate the bianca and the bianca background the bobby then the bobby does not like the bianca. If the bianca ptyalize the bobby then the bianca background the bobby. The bianca does not like the bianca.", "logic": "\nHumified(bobby)\nPhonic(bobby)\nCrinoid(bobby)\nZapotec(bobby)\nBackground(bobby, bianca)\nnot Comminate(bobby, bianca)\nPtyalize(bobby, bianca)\nHumified(bianca)\nPhonic(bianca)\nCrinoid(bianca)\nTuneful(bianca)\nZapotec(bianca)\nBackground(bianca, bobby)\nnot Comminate(bianca, bobby)\nPtyalize(bianca, bobby)\nforall x (Phonic(x) and Comminate(x, bianca) -> not Comminate(bianca, bobby))\nforall x (Crinoid(x) and Ptyalize(x, bianca) -> Humified(bianca))\nforall x (Comminate(x, bobby) -> not Humified(x))\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> Ptyalize(x, bobby))\nforall x (Zapotec(x) -> not Comminate(x, bianca))\nforall x (Background(x, bianca) and not Humified(x) -> not Ptyalize(bianca, bobby))\nforall x (Comminate(x, bianca) and Background(bianca, bobby) -> not Background(bobby, bianca))\nPtyalize(bianca, bobby) -> Background(bianca, bobby)\n\nnot Background(bianca, bianca)\n\nnot Background(bianca, bianca) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4491"} {"premises": "The osbourn is anorthic. The osbourn is hardy. The osbourn is spheroidal. The osbourn is memberless. The osbourn patent the donovan. The osbourn does not see the donovan. The osbourn redo the donovan. The donovan is anorthic. The donovan is hardy. The donovan is spheroidal. The donovan is aurous. The donovan is memberless. The donovan patent the osbourn. The donovan does not see the osbourn. The donovan redo the osbourn. If someone is hardy and they see the donovan then the donovan does not see the osbourn. If someone is spheroidal and they visit the donovan then the donovan is anorthic. If someone adjudicate the osbourn then they are not anorthic. If someone is memberless then they visit the osbourn. If someone is memberless then they do not see the donovan. If someone patent the donovan and they are not anorthic then the donovan does not visit the osbourn. If someone adjudicate the donovan and the donovan patent the osbourn then the osbourn does not like the donovan. If the donovan redo the osbourn then the donovan patent the osbourn. The osbourn patent the osbourn.", "logic": "\nAnorthic(osbourn)\nHardy(osbourn)\nSpheroidal(osbourn)\nMemberless(osbourn)\nPatent(osbourn, donovan)\nnot Adjudicate(osbourn, donovan)\nRedo(osbourn, donovan)\nAnorthic(donovan)\nHardy(donovan)\nSpheroidal(donovan)\nAurous(donovan)\nMemberless(donovan)\nPatent(donovan, osbourn)\nnot Adjudicate(donovan, osbourn)\nRedo(donovan, osbourn)\nforall x (Hardy(x) and Adjudicate(x, donovan) -> not Adjudicate(donovan, osbourn))\nforall x (Spheroidal(x) and Redo(x, donovan) -> Anorthic(donovan))\nforall x (Adjudicate(x, osbourn) -> not Anorthic(x))\nforall x (Memberless(x) -> Redo(x, osbourn))\nforall x (Memberless(x) -> not Adjudicate(x, donovan))\nforall x (Patent(x, donovan) and not Anorthic(x) -> not Redo(donovan, osbourn))\nforall x (Adjudicate(x, donovan) and Patent(donovan, osbourn) -> not Patent(osbourn, donovan))\nRedo(donovan, osbourn) -> Patent(donovan, osbourn)\n\nPatent(osbourn, osbourn)\n\nPatent(osbourn, osbourn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4491"} {"premises": "The thomas is aciculate. The thomas implement the brigit. The thomas implement the eugenia. The thomas ballyrag the brigit. The brigit adduce the eugenia. The brigit is graduate. The brigit implement the thomas. The brigit ballyrag the thomas. The eugenia adduce the thomas. The eugenia adduce the brigit. The eugenia is unliveable. The eugenia is modernised. The eugenia is febrile. The eugenia implement the brigit. The eugenia ballyrag the thomas. The eugenia ballyrag the brigit. If someone adduce the thomas and the thomas ballyrag the eugenia then the thomas implement the brigit. If someone implement the thomas and they see the brigit then they are unliveable. If someone is modernised then they visit the eugenia. If someone is aciculate then they see the eugenia. If someone ballyrag the eugenia and the eugenia adduce the thomas then they chase the brigit. If someone ballyrag the brigit then the brigit is modernised. The eugenia is febrile.", "logic": "\nAciculate(thomas)\nImplement(thomas, brigit)\nImplement(thomas, eugenia)\nBallyrag(thomas, brigit)\nAdduce(brigit, eugenia)\nGraduate(brigit)\nImplement(brigit, thomas)\nBallyrag(brigit, thomas)\nAdduce(eugenia, thomas)\nAdduce(eugenia, brigit)\nUnliveable(eugenia)\nModernised(eugenia)\nFebrile(eugenia)\nImplement(eugenia, brigit)\nBallyrag(eugenia, thomas)\nBallyrag(eugenia, brigit)\nforall x (Adduce(x, thomas) and Ballyrag(thomas, eugenia) -> Implement(thomas, brigit))\nforall x (Implement(x, thomas) and Implement(x, brigit) -> Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> Ballyrag(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Aciculate(x) -> Implement(x, eugenia))\nforall x (Ballyrag(x, eugenia) and Adduce(eugenia, thomas) -> Adduce(x, brigit))\nforall x (Ballyrag(x, brigit) -> Modernised(brigit))\n\nFebrile(eugenia)\n\ntherefore Febrile(eugenia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The winford is arborous. The winford curvet the kellie. The winford curvet the oneida. The winford gear the kellie. The kellie contribute the oneida. The kellie is subsidiary. The kellie curvet the winford. The kellie gear the winford. The oneida contribute the winford. The oneida contribute the kellie. The oneida is sixpenny. The oneida is fledgeling. The oneida is parented. The oneida curvet the kellie. The oneida gear the winford. The oneida gear the kellie. If someone contribute the winford and the winford gear the oneida then the winford curvet the kellie. If someone curvet the winford and they see the kellie then they are sixpenny. If someone is fledgeling then they visit the oneida. If someone is arborous then they see the oneida. If someone gear the oneida and the oneida contribute the winford then they chase the kellie. If someone gear the kellie then the kellie is fledgeling. The kellie does not visit the winford.", "logic": "\nArborous(winford)\nCurvet(winford, kellie)\nCurvet(winford, oneida)\nGear(winford, kellie)\nContribute(kellie, oneida)\nSubsidiary(kellie)\nCurvet(kellie, winford)\nGear(kellie, winford)\nContribute(oneida, winford)\nContribute(oneida, kellie)\nSixpenny(oneida)\nFledgeling(oneida)\nParented(oneida)\nCurvet(oneida, kellie)\nGear(oneida, winford)\nGear(oneida, kellie)\nforall x (Contribute(x, winford) and Gear(winford, oneida) -> Curvet(winford, kellie))\nforall x (Curvet(x, winford) and Curvet(x, kellie) -> Sixpenny(x))\nforall x (Fledgeling(x) -> Gear(x, oneida))\nforall x (Arborous(x) -> Curvet(x, oneida))\nforall x (Gear(x, oneida) and Contribute(oneida, winford) -> Contribute(x, kellie))\nforall x (Gear(x, kellie) -> Fledgeling(kellie))\n\nnot Gear(kellie, winford)\n\ntherefore Gear(kellie, winford)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The ulrika is aliphatic. The ulrika pucker the nathanil. The ulrika pucker the jef. The ulrika churn the nathanil. The nathanil ramify the jef. The nathanil is showy. The nathanil pucker the ulrika. The nathanil churn the ulrika. The jef ramify the ulrika. The jef ramify the nathanil. The jef is forested. The jef is colloidal. The jef is recumbent. The jef pucker the nathanil. The jef churn the ulrika. The jef churn the nathanil. If someone ramify the ulrika and the ulrika churn the jef then the ulrika pucker the nathanil. If someone pucker the ulrika and they see the nathanil then they are forested. If someone is colloidal then they visit the jef. If someone is aliphatic then they see the jef. If someone churn the jef and the jef ramify the ulrika then they chase the nathanil. If someone churn the nathanil then the nathanil is colloidal. The jef churn the jef.", "logic": "\nAliphatic(ulrika)\nPucker(ulrika, nathanil)\nPucker(ulrika, jef)\nChurn(ulrika, nathanil)\nRamify(nathanil, jef)\nShowy(nathanil)\nPucker(nathanil, ulrika)\nChurn(nathanil, ulrika)\nRamify(jef, ulrika)\nRamify(jef, nathanil)\nForested(jef)\nColloidal(jef)\nRecumbent(jef)\nPucker(jef, nathanil)\nChurn(jef, ulrika)\nChurn(jef, nathanil)\nforall x (Ramify(x, ulrika) and Churn(ulrika, jef) -> Pucker(ulrika, nathanil))\nforall x (Pucker(x, ulrika) and Pucker(x, nathanil) -> Forested(x))\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> Churn(x, jef))\nforall x (Aliphatic(x) -> Pucker(x, jef))\nforall x (Churn(x, jef) and Ramify(jef, ulrika) -> Ramify(x, nathanil))\nforall x (Churn(x, nathanil) -> Colloidal(nathanil))\n\nChurn(jef, jef)\n\nColloidal(jef) and forall x (Colloidal(x) -> Churn(x, jef)) -> therefore Churn(jef, jef)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The doralyn is bentonitic. The doralyn clarify the kin. The doralyn clarify the patrica. The doralyn mushroom the kin. The kin wholesale the patrica. The kin is tarry. The kin clarify the doralyn. The kin mushroom the doralyn. The patrica wholesale the doralyn. The patrica wholesale the kin. The patrica is larghetto. The patrica is lowbrow. The patrica is mixed. The patrica clarify the kin. The patrica mushroom the doralyn. The patrica mushroom the kin. If someone wholesale the doralyn and the doralyn mushroom the patrica then the doralyn clarify the kin. If someone clarify the doralyn and they see the kin then they are larghetto. If someone is lowbrow then they visit the patrica. If someone is bentonitic then they see the patrica. If someone mushroom the patrica and the patrica wholesale the doralyn then they chase the kin. If someone mushroom the kin then the kin is lowbrow. The patrica does not visit the patrica.", "logic": "\nBentonitic(doralyn)\nClarify(doralyn, kin)\nClarify(doralyn, patrica)\nMushroom(doralyn, kin)\nWholesale(kin, patrica)\nTarry(kin)\nClarify(kin, doralyn)\nMushroom(kin, doralyn)\nWholesale(patrica, doralyn)\nWholesale(patrica, kin)\nLarghetto(patrica)\nLowbrow(patrica)\nMixed(patrica)\nClarify(patrica, kin)\nMushroom(patrica, doralyn)\nMushroom(patrica, kin)\nforall x (Wholesale(x, doralyn) and Mushroom(doralyn, patrica) -> Clarify(doralyn, kin))\nforall x (Clarify(x, doralyn) and Clarify(x, kin) -> Larghetto(x))\nforall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Mushroom(x, patrica))\nforall x (Bentonitic(x) -> Clarify(x, patrica))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, patrica) and Wholesale(patrica, doralyn) -> Wholesale(x, kin))\nforall x (Mushroom(x, kin) -> Lowbrow(kin))\n\nnot Mushroom(patrica, patrica)\n\nLowbrow(patrica) and forall x (Lowbrow(x) -> Mushroom(x, patrica)) -> therefore Mushroom(patrica, patrica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The janean is galvanic. The janean grey the fawne. The janean grey the wat. The janean recover the fawne. The fawne posit the wat. The fawne is populated. The fawne grey the janean. The fawne recover the janean. The wat posit the janean. The wat posit the fawne. The wat is randomised. The wat is tolerable. The wat is healthy. The wat grey the fawne. The wat recover the janean. The wat recover the fawne. If someone posit the janean and the janean recover the wat then the janean grey the fawne. If someone grey the janean and they see the fawne then they are randomised. If someone is tolerable then they visit the wat. If someone is galvanic then they see the wat. If someone recover the wat and the wat posit the janean then they chase the fawne. If someone recover the fawne then the fawne is tolerable. The fawne recover the wat.", "logic": "\nGalvanic(janean)\nGrey(janean, fawne)\nGrey(janean, wat)\nRecover(janean, fawne)\nPosit(fawne, wat)\nPopulated(fawne)\nGrey(fawne, janean)\nRecover(fawne, janean)\nPosit(wat, janean)\nPosit(wat, fawne)\nRandomised(wat)\nTolerable(wat)\nHealthy(wat)\nGrey(wat, fawne)\nRecover(wat, janean)\nRecover(wat, fawne)\nforall x (Posit(x, janean) and Recover(janean, wat) -> Grey(janean, fawne))\nforall x (Grey(x, janean) and Grey(x, fawne) -> Randomised(x))\nforall x (Tolerable(x) -> Recover(x, wat))\nforall x (Galvanic(x) -> Grey(x, wat))\nforall x (Recover(x, wat) and Posit(wat, janean) -> Posit(x, fawne))\nforall x (Recover(x, fawne) -> Tolerable(fawne))\n\nRecover(fawne, wat)\n\nRecover(wat, fawne) and forall x (Recover(x, fawne) -> Tolerable(fawne)) -> therefore Tolerable(fawne) Tolerable(fawne) and forall x (Tolerable(x) -> Recover(x, wat)) -> therefore Recover(fawne, wat)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The johnathan is sobering. The johnathan chin the winny. The johnathan chin the barby. The johnathan politick the winny. The winny wilt the barby. The winny is laden. The winny chin the johnathan. The winny politick the johnathan. The barby wilt the johnathan. The barby wilt the winny. The barby is myelinic. The barby is unseasoned. The barby is hulky. The barby chin the winny. The barby politick the johnathan. The barby politick the winny. If someone wilt the johnathan and the johnathan politick the barby then the johnathan chin the winny. If someone chin the johnathan and they see the winny then they are myelinic. If someone is unseasoned then they visit the barby. If someone is sobering then they see the barby. If someone politick the barby and the barby wilt the johnathan then they chase the winny. If someone politick the winny then the winny is unseasoned. The winny does not visit the barby.", "logic": "\nSobering(johnathan)\nChin(johnathan, winny)\nChin(johnathan, barby)\nPolitick(johnathan, winny)\nWilt(winny, barby)\nLaden(winny)\nChin(winny, johnathan)\nPolitick(winny, johnathan)\nWilt(barby, johnathan)\nWilt(barby, winny)\nMyelinic(barby)\nUnseasoned(barby)\nHulky(barby)\nChin(barby, winny)\nPolitick(barby, johnathan)\nPolitick(barby, winny)\nforall x (Wilt(x, johnathan) and Politick(johnathan, barby) -> Chin(johnathan, winny))\nforall x (Chin(x, johnathan) and Chin(x, winny) -> Myelinic(x))\nforall x (Unseasoned(x) -> Politick(x, barby))\nforall x (Sobering(x) -> Chin(x, barby))\nforall x (Politick(x, barby) and Wilt(barby, johnathan) -> Wilt(x, winny))\nforall x (Politick(x, winny) -> Unseasoned(winny))\n\nnot Politick(winny, barby)\n\nPolitick(barby, winny) and forall x (Politick(x, winny) -> Unseasoned(winny)) -> therefore Unseasoned(winny) Unseasoned(winny) and forall x (Unseasoned(x) -> Politick(x, barby)) -> therefore Politick(winny, barby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The nisse is unruffled. The nisse stir the fanchon. The nisse stir the wilton. The nisse underspend the fanchon. The fanchon match the wilton. The fanchon is guardant. The fanchon stir the nisse. The fanchon underspend the nisse. The wilton match the nisse. The wilton match the fanchon. The wilton is alternate. The wilton is jejune. The wilton is tallish. The wilton stir the fanchon. The wilton underspend the nisse. The wilton underspend the fanchon. If someone match the nisse and the nisse underspend the wilton then the nisse stir the fanchon. If someone stir the nisse and they see the fanchon then they are alternate. If someone is jejune then they visit the wilton. If someone is unruffled then they see the wilton. If someone underspend the wilton and the wilton match the nisse then they chase the fanchon. If someone underspend the fanchon then the fanchon is jejune. The fanchon match the fanchon.", "logic": "\nUnruffled(nisse)\nStir(nisse, fanchon)\nStir(nisse, wilton)\nUnderspend(nisse, fanchon)\nMatch(fanchon, wilton)\nGuardant(fanchon)\nStir(fanchon, nisse)\nUnderspend(fanchon, nisse)\nMatch(wilton, nisse)\nMatch(wilton, fanchon)\nAlternate(wilton)\nJejune(wilton)\nTallish(wilton)\nStir(wilton, fanchon)\nUnderspend(wilton, nisse)\nUnderspend(wilton, fanchon)\nforall x (Match(x, nisse) and Underspend(nisse, wilton) -> Stir(nisse, fanchon))\nforall x (Stir(x, nisse) and Stir(x, fanchon) -> Alternate(x))\nforall x (Jejune(x) -> Underspend(x, wilton))\nforall x (Unruffled(x) -> Stir(x, wilton))\nforall x (Underspend(x, wilton) and Match(wilton, nisse) -> Match(x, fanchon))\nforall x (Underspend(x, fanchon) -> Jejune(fanchon))\n\nMatch(fanchon, fanchon)\n\nUnderspend(wilton, fanchon) and forall x (Underspend(x, fanchon) -> Jejune(fanchon)) -> therefore Jejune(fanchon) Jejune(fanchon) and forall x (Jejune(x) -> Underspend(x, wilton)) -> therefore Underspend(fanchon, wilton) Underspend(fanchon, wilton) and Match(wilton, nisse) and forall x (Underspend(x, wilton) and Match(wilton, nisse) -> Match(x, fanchon)) -> therefore Match(fanchon, fanchon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The chaim is uncurbed. The chaim imprint the clarisa. The chaim imprint the laurette. The chaim confide the clarisa. The clarisa suppress the laurette. The clarisa is filipino. The clarisa imprint the chaim. The clarisa confide the chaim. The laurette suppress the chaim. The laurette suppress the clarisa. The laurette is autogenic. The laurette is meshed. The laurette is fortissimo. The laurette imprint the clarisa. The laurette confide the chaim. The laurette confide the clarisa. If someone suppress the chaim and the chaim confide the laurette then the chaim imprint the clarisa. If someone imprint the chaim and they see the clarisa then they are autogenic. If someone is meshed then they visit the laurette. If someone is uncurbed then they see the laurette. If someone confide the laurette and the laurette suppress the chaim then they chase the clarisa. If someone confide the clarisa then the clarisa is meshed. The clarisa does not chase the clarisa.", "logic": "\nUncurbed(chaim)\nImprint(chaim, clarisa)\nImprint(chaim, laurette)\nConfide(chaim, clarisa)\nSuppress(clarisa, laurette)\nFilipino(clarisa)\nImprint(clarisa, chaim)\nConfide(clarisa, chaim)\nSuppress(laurette, chaim)\nSuppress(laurette, clarisa)\nAutogenic(laurette)\nMeshed(laurette)\nFortissimo(laurette)\nImprint(laurette, clarisa)\nConfide(laurette, chaim)\nConfide(laurette, clarisa)\nforall x (Suppress(x, chaim) and Confide(chaim, laurette) -> Imprint(chaim, clarisa))\nforall x (Imprint(x, chaim) and Imprint(x, clarisa) -> Autogenic(x))\nforall x (Meshed(x) -> Confide(x, laurette))\nforall x (Uncurbed(x) -> Imprint(x, laurette))\nforall x (Confide(x, laurette) and Suppress(laurette, chaim) -> Suppress(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Confide(x, clarisa) -> Meshed(clarisa))\n\nnot Suppress(clarisa, clarisa)\n\nConfide(laurette, clarisa) and forall x (Confide(x, clarisa) -> Meshed(clarisa)) -> therefore Meshed(clarisa) Meshed(clarisa) and forall x (Meshed(x) -> Confide(x, laurette)) -> therefore Confide(clarisa, laurette) Confide(clarisa, laurette) and Suppress(laurette, chaim) and forall x (Confide(x, laurette) and Suppress(laurette, chaim) -> Suppress(x, clarisa)) -> therefore Suppress(clarisa, clarisa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The danell is snuggled. The danell baronetize the darci. The danell baronetize the eimile. The danell deduce the darci. The darci electrify the eimile. The darci is catalan. The darci baronetize the danell. The darci deduce the danell. The eimile electrify the danell. The eimile electrify the darci. The eimile is masterly. The eimile is biaxial. The eimile is improbable. The eimile baronetize the darci. The eimile deduce the danell. The eimile deduce the darci. If someone electrify the danell and the danell deduce the eimile then the danell baronetize the darci. If someone baronetize the danell and they see the darci then they are masterly. If someone is biaxial then they visit the eimile. If someone is snuggled then they see the eimile. If someone deduce the eimile and the eimile electrify the danell then they chase the darci. If someone deduce the darci then the darci is biaxial. The eimile does not see the eimile.", "logic": "\nSnuggled(danell)\nBaronetize(danell, darci)\nBaronetize(danell, eimile)\nDeduce(danell, darci)\nElectrify(darci, eimile)\nCatalan(darci)\nBaronetize(darci, danell)\nDeduce(darci, danell)\nElectrify(eimile, danell)\nElectrify(eimile, darci)\nMasterly(eimile)\nBiaxial(eimile)\nImprobable(eimile)\nBaronetize(eimile, darci)\nDeduce(eimile, danell)\nDeduce(eimile, darci)\nforall x (Electrify(x, danell) and Deduce(danell, eimile) -> Baronetize(danell, darci))\nforall x (Baronetize(x, danell) and Baronetize(x, darci) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Biaxial(x) -> Deduce(x, eimile))\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> Baronetize(x, eimile))\nforall x (Deduce(x, eimile) and Electrify(eimile, danell) -> Electrify(x, darci))\nforall x (Deduce(x, darci) -> Biaxial(darci))\n\nnot Baronetize(eimile, eimile)\n\nforall x (Snuggled(x) -> Baronetize(x, eimile)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The bradley is mortgaged. The bradley enthrone the corky. The bradley enthrone the matthus. The bradley dive the corky. The corky segregate the matthus. The corky is synclinal. The corky enthrone the bradley. The corky dive the bradley. The matthus segregate the bradley. The matthus segregate the corky. The matthus is swart. The matthus is moravian. The matthus is cognizant. The matthus enthrone the corky. The matthus dive the bradley. The matthus dive the corky. If someone segregate the bradley and the bradley dive the matthus then the bradley enthrone the corky. If someone enthrone the bradley and they see the corky then they are swart. If someone is moravian then they visit the matthus. If someone is mortgaged then they see the matthus. If someone dive the matthus and the matthus segregate the bradley then they chase the corky. If someone dive the corky then the corky is moravian. The corky enthrone the matthus.", "logic": "\nMortgaged(bradley)\nEnthrone(bradley, corky)\nEnthrone(bradley, matthus)\nDive(bradley, corky)\nSegregate(corky, matthus)\nSynclinal(corky)\nEnthrone(corky, bradley)\nDive(corky, bradley)\nSegregate(matthus, bradley)\nSegregate(matthus, corky)\nSwart(matthus)\nMoravian(matthus)\nCognizant(matthus)\nEnthrone(matthus, corky)\nDive(matthus, bradley)\nDive(matthus, corky)\nforall x (Segregate(x, bradley) and Dive(bradley, matthus) -> Enthrone(bradley, corky))\nforall x (Enthrone(x, bradley) and Enthrone(x, corky) -> Swart(x))\nforall x (Moravian(x) -> Dive(x, matthus))\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Enthrone(x, matthus))\nforall x (Dive(x, matthus) and Segregate(matthus, bradley) -> Segregate(x, corky))\nforall x (Dive(x, corky) -> Moravian(corky))\n\nEnthrone(corky, matthus)\n\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> Enthrone(x, matthus)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The matt is starchless. The matt span the carolie. The matt span the tyrone. The matt poach the carolie. The carolie luxate the tyrone. The carolie is incidental. The carolie span the matt. The carolie poach the matt. The tyrone luxate the matt. The tyrone luxate the carolie. The tyrone is redemptory. The tyrone is pyretic. The tyrone is adsorbable. The tyrone span the carolie. The tyrone poach the matt. The tyrone poach the carolie. If someone luxate the matt and the matt poach the tyrone then the matt span the carolie. If someone span the matt and they see the carolie then they are redemptory. If someone is pyretic then they visit the tyrone. If someone is starchless then they see the tyrone. If someone poach the tyrone and the tyrone luxate the matt then they chase the carolie. If someone poach the carolie then the carolie is pyretic. The matt does not visit the tyrone.", "logic": "\nStarchless(matt)\nSpan(matt, carolie)\nSpan(matt, tyrone)\nPoach(matt, carolie)\nLuxate(carolie, tyrone)\nIncidental(carolie)\nSpan(carolie, matt)\nPoach(carolie, matt)\nLuxate(tyrone, matt)\nLuxate(tyrone, carolie)\nRedemptory(tyrone)\nPyretic(tyrone)\nAdsorbable(tyrone)\nSpan(tyrone, carolie)\nPoach(tyrone, matt)\nPoach(tyrone, carolie)\nforall x (Luxate(x, matt) and Poach(matt, tyrone) -> Span(matt, carolie))\nforall x (Span(x, matt) and Span(x, carolie) -> Redemptory(x))\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Poach(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Starchless(x) -> Span(x, tyrone))\nforall x (Poach(x, tyrone) and Luxate(tyrone, matt) -> Luxate(x, carolie))\nforall x (Poach(x, carolie) -> Pyretic(carolie))\n\nnot Poach(matt, tyrone)\n\nforall x (Pyretic(x) -> Poach(x, tyrone)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The anthia is imprudent. The anthia abuse the violette. The anthia abuse the hilbert. The anthia eradicate the violette. The violette impale the hilbert. The violette is canorous. The violette abuse the anthia. The violette eradicate the anthia. The hilbert impale the anthia. The hilbert impale the violette. The hilbert is antigenic. The hilbert is past. The hilbert is encysted. The hilbert abuse the violette. The hilbert eradicate the anthia. The hilbert eradicate the violette. If someone impale the anthia and the anthia eradicate the hilbert then the anthia abuse the violette. If someone abuse the anthia and they see the violette then they are antigenic. If someone is past then they visit the hilbert. If someone is imprudent then they see the hilbert. If someone eradicate the hilbert and the hilbert impale the anthia then they chase the violette. If someone eradicate the violette then the violette is past. The anthia is antigenic.", "logic": "\nImprudent(anthia)\nAbuse(anthia, violette)\nAbuse(anthia, hilbert)\nEradicate(anthia, violette)\nImpale(violette, hilbert)\nCanorous(violette)\nAbuse(violette, anthia)\nEradicate(violette, anthia)\nImpale(hilbert, anthia)\nImpale(hilbert, violette)\nAntigenic(hilbert)\nPast(hilbert)\nEncysted(hilbert)\nAbuse(hilbert, violette)\nEradicate(hilbert, anthia)\nEradicate(hilbert, violette)\nforall x (Impale(x, anthia) and Eradicate(anthia, hilbert) -> Abuse(anthia, violette))\nforall x (Abuse(x, anthia) and Abuse(x, violette) -> Antigenic(x))\nforall x (Past(x) -> Eradicate(x, hilbert))\nforall x (Imprudent(x) -> Abuse(x, hilbert))\nforall x (Eradicate(x, hilbert) and Impale(hilbert, anthia) -> Impale(x, violette))\nforall x (Eradicate(x, violette) -> Past(violette))\n\nAntigenic(anthia)\n\nforall x (Abuse(x, anthia) and Abuse(x, violette) -> Antigenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The marko is unattired. The marko patter the gloriana. The marko patter the mischa. The marko crock the gloriana. The gloriana skydive the mischa. The gloriana is darkening. The gloriana patter the marko. The gloriana crock the marko. The mischa skydive the marko. The mischa skydive the gloriana. The mischa is distal. The mischa is azoic. The mischa is finite. The mischa patter the gloriana. The mischa crock the marko. The mischa crock the gloriana. If someone skydive the marko and the marko crock the mischa then the marko patter the gloriana. If someone patter the marko and they see the gloriana then they are distal. If someone is azoic then they visit the mischa. If someone is unattired then they see the mischa. If someone crock the mischa and the mischa skydive the marko then they chase the gloriana. If someone crock the gloriana then the gloriana is azoic. The mischa is not darkening.", "logic": "\nUnattired(marko)\nPatter(marko, gloriana)\nPatter(marko, mischa)\nCrock(marko, gloriana)\nSkydive(gloriana, mischa)\nDarkening(gloriana)\nPatter(gloriana, marko)\nCrock(gloriana, marko)\nSkydive(mischa, marko)\nSkydive(mischa, gloriana)\nDistal(mischa)\nAzoic(mischa)\nFinite(mischa)\nPatter(mischa, gloriana)\nCrock(mischa, marko)\nCrock(mischa, gloriana)\nforall x (Skydive(x, marko) and Crock(marko, mischa) -> Patter(marko, gloriana))\nforall x (Patter(x, marko) and Patter(x, gloriana) -> Distal(x))\nforall x (Azoic(x) -> Crock(x, mischa))\nforall x (Unattired(x) -> Patter(x, mischa))\nforall x (Crock(x, mischa) and Skydive(mischa, marko) -> Skydive(x, gloriana))\nforall x (Crock(x, gloriana) -> Azoic(gloriana))\n\nnot Darkening(mischa)\n\nnot Darkening(mischa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The derk is cornered. The derk excise the queenie. The derk excise the minna. The derk embellish the queenie. The queenie transfix the minna. The queenie is javanese. The queenie excise the derk. The queenie embellish the derk. The minna transfix the derk. The minna transfix the queenie. The minna is exalting. The minna is avellane. The minna is inverse. The minna excise the queenie. The minna embellish the derk. The minna embellish the queenie. If someone transfix the derk and the derk embellish the minna then the derk excise the queenie. If someone excise the derk and they see the queenie then they are exalting. If someone is avellane then they visit the minna. If someone is cornered then they see the minna. If someone embellish the minna and the minna transfix the derk then they chase the queenie. If someone embellish the queenie then the queenie is avellane. The minna excise the derk.", "logic": "\nCornered(derk)\nExcise(derk, queenie)\nExcise(derk, minna)\nEmbellish(derk, queenie)\nTransfix(queenie, minna)\nJavanese(queenie)\nExcise(queenie, derk)\nEmbellish(queenie, derk)\nTransfix(minna, derk)\nTransfix(minna, queenie)\nExalting(minna)\nAvellane(minna)\nInverse(minna)\nExcise(minna, queenie)\nEmbellish(minna, derk)\nEmbellish(minna, queenie)\nforall x (Transfix(x, derk) and Embellish(derk, minna) -> Excise(derk, queenie))\nforall x (Excise(x, derk) and Excise(x, queenie) -> Exalting(x))\nforall x (Avellane(x) -> Embellish(x, minna))\nforall x (Cornered(x) -> Excise(x, minna))\nforall x (Embellish(x, minna) and Transfix(minna, derk) -> Transfix(x, queenie))\nforall x (Embellish(x, queenie) -> Avellane(queenie))\n\nExcise(minna, derk)\n\nExcise(minna, derk) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The somerset is chirpy. The somerset inflate the freddie. The somerset inflate the cheri. The somerset slew the freddie. The freddie calcify the cheri. The freddie is exalting. The freddie inflate the somerset. The freddie slew the somerset. The cheri calcify the somerset. The cheri calcify the freddie. The cheri is absent. The cheri is avian. The cheri is jaded. The cheri inflate the freddie. The cheri slew the somerset. The cheri slew the freddie. If someone calcify the somerset and the somerset slew the cheri then the somerset inflate the freddie. If someone inflate the somerset and they see the freddie then they are absent. If someone is avian then they visit the cheri. If someone is chirpy then they see the cheri. If someone slew the cheri and the cheri calcify the somerset then they chase the freddie. If someone slew the freddie then the freddie is avian. The cheri is not chirpy.", "logic": "\nChirpy(somerset)\nInflate(somerset, freddie)\nInflate(somerset, cheri)\nSlew(somerset, freddie)\nCalcify(freddie, cheri)\nExalting(freddie)\nInflate(freddie, somerset)\nSlew(freddie, somerset)\nCalcify(cheri, somerset)\nCalcify(cheri, freddie)\nAbsent(cheri)\nAvian(cheri)\nJaded(cheri)\nInflate(cheri, freddie)\nSlew(cheri, somerset)\nSlew(cheri, freddie)\nforall x (Calcify(x, somerset) and Slew(somerset, cheri) -> Inflate(somerset, freddie))\nforall x (Inflate(x, somerset) and Inflate(x, freddie) -> Absent(x))\nforall x (Avian(x) -> Slew(x, cheri))\nforall x (Chirpy(x) -> Inflate(x, cheri))\nforall x (Slew(x, cheri) and Calcify(cheri, somerset) -> Calcify(x, freddie))\nforall x (Slew(x, freddie) -> Avian(freddie))\n\nnot Chirpy(cheri)\n\nnot Chirpy(cheri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The valerye is outlaw. The valerye enkindle the lazare. The valerye enkindle the tomasina. The valerye larrup the lazare. The lazare copyright the tomasina. The lazare is ebullient. The lazare enkindle the valerye. The lazare larrup the valerye. The tomasina copyright the valerye. The tomasina copyright the lazare. The tomasina is destroyed. The tomasina is obdurate. The tomasina is subscript. The tomasina enkindle the lazare. The tomasina larrup the valerye. The tomasina larrup the lazare. If someone copyright the valerye and the valerye larrup the tomasina then the valerye enkindle the lazare. If someone enkindle the valerye and they see the lazare then they are destroyed. If someone is obdurate then they visit the tomasina. If someone is outlaw then they see the tomasina. If someone larrup the tomasina and the tomasina copyright the valerye then they chase the lazare. If someone larrup the lazare then the lazare is obdurate. The valerye copyright the valerye.", "logic": "\nOutlaw(valerye)\nEnkindle(valerye, lazare)\nEnkindle(valerye, tomasina)\nLarrup(valerye, lazare)\nCopyright(lazare, tomasina)\nEbullient(lazare)\nEnkindle(lazare, valerye)\nLarrup(lazare, valerye)\nCopyright(tomasina, valerye)\nCopyright(tomasina, lazare)\nDestroyed(tomasina)\nObdurate(tomasina)\nSubscript(tomasina)\nEnkindle(tomasina, lazare)\nLarrup(tomasina, valerye)\nLarrup(tomasina, lazare)\nforall x (Copyright(x, valerye) and Larrup(valerye, tomasina) -> Enkindle(valerye, lazare))\nforall x (Enkindle(x, valerye) and Enkindle(x, lazare) -> Destroyed(x))\nforall x (Obdurate(x) -> Larrup(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Outlaw(x) -> Enkindle(x, tomasina))\nforall x (Larrup(x, tomasina) and Copyright(tomasina, valerye) -> Copyright(x, lazare))\nforall x (Larrup(x, lazare) -> Obdurate(lazare))\n\nCopyright(valerye, valerye)\n\nCopyright(valerye, valerye) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-549"} {"premises": "The patty treasure the rahel. The patty flush the rahel. The patty wrest the rahel. The rahel treasure the patty. The rahel flush the patty. The rahel is terrible. The rahel wrest the patty. If the rahel wrest the patty and the rahel is otic then the rahel flush the patty. If something wrest the patty then it flush the rahel. If something flush the rahel then it treasure the rahel. If something flush the rahel then the rahel treasure the patty. If something treasure the patty then the patty treasure the rahel. All rootbound things are hammy. If something treasure the rahel then it is hammy. Red things are otic. The patty treasure the rahel.", "logic": "\nTreasure(patty, rahel)\nFlush(patty, rahel)\nWrest(patty, rahel)\nTreasure(rahel, patty)\nFlush(rahel, patty)\nTerrible(rahel)\nWrest(rahel, patty)\nWrest(rahel, patty) and Otic(rahel) -> Flush(rahel, patty)\nforall x (Wrest(x, patty) -> Flush(x, rahel))\nforall x (Flush(x, rahel) -> Treasure(x, rahel))\nforall x (Flush(x, rahel) -> Treasure(rahel, patty))\nforall x (Treasure(x, patty) -> Treasure(patty, rahel))\nforall x (Rootbound(x) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Treasure(x, rahel) -> Hammy(x))\nforall x (Rootbound(x) -> Otic(x))\n\nTreasure(patty, rahel)\n\ntherefore Treasure(patty, rahel)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The glynda foam the pyotr. The glynda pocket the pyotr. The glynda spiritize the pyotr. The pyotr foam the glynda. The pyotr pocket the glynda. The pyotr is desecrated. The pyotr spiritize the glynda. If the pyotr spiritize the glynda and the pyotr is solvent then the pyotr pocket the glynda. If something spiritize the glynda then it pocket the pyotr. If something pocket the pyotr then it foam the pyotr. If something pocket the pyotr then the pyotr foam the glynda. If something foam the glynda then the glynda foam the pyotr. All confirmed things are gushing. If something foam the pyotr then it is gushing. Red things are solvent. The glynda does not like the pyotr.", "logic": "\nFoam(glynda, pyotr)\nPocket(glynda, pyotr)\nSpiritize(glynda, pyotr)\nFoam(pyotr, glynda)\nPocket(pyotr, glynda)\nDesecrated(pyotr)\nSpiritize(pyotr, glynda)\nSpiritize(pyotr, glynda) and Solvent(pyotr) -> Pocket(pyotr, glynda)\nforall x (Spiritize(x, glynda) -> Pocket(x, pyotr))\nforall x (Pocket(x, pyotr) -> Foam(x, pyotr))\nforall x (Pocket(x, pyotr) -> Foam(pyotr, glynda))\nforall x (Foam(x, glynda) -> Foam(glynda, pyotr))\nforall x (Confirmed(x) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Foam(x, pyotr) -> Gushing(x))\nforall x (Confirmed(x) -> Solvent(x))\n\nnot Spiritize(glynda, pyotr)\n\ntherefore Spiritize(glynda, pyotr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The giralda sort the tuckie. The giralda jinx the tuckie. The giralda recrudesce the tuckie. The tuckie sort the giralda. The tuckie jinx the giralda. The tuckie is isolated. The tuckie recrudesce the giralda. If the tuckie recrudesce the giralda and the tuckie is undismayed then the tuckie jinx the giralda. If something recrudesce the giralda then it jinx the tuckie. If something jinx the tuckie then it sort the tuckie. If something jinx the tuckie then the tuckie sort the giralda. If something sort the giralda then the giralda sort the tuckie. All continuant things are lxiv. If something sort the tuckie then it is lxiv. Red things are undismayed. The giralda is lxiv.", "logic": "\nSort(giralda, tuckie)\nJinx(giralda, tuckie)\nRecrudesce(giralda, tuckie)\nSort(tuckie, giralda)\nJinx(tuckie, giralda)\nIsolated(tuckie)\nRecrudesce(tuckie, giralda)\nRecrudesce(tuckie, giralda) and Undismayed(tuckie) -> Jinx(tuckie, giralda)\nforall x (Recrudesce(x, giralda) -> Jinx(x, tuckie))\nforall x (Jinx(x, tuckie) -> Sort(x, tuckie))\nforall x (Jinx(x, tuckie) -> Sort(tuckie, giralda))\nforall x (Sort(x, giralda) -> Sort(giralda, tuckie))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Lxiv(x))\nforall x (Sort(x, tuckie) -> Lxiv(x))\nforall x (Continuant(x) -> Undismayed(x))\n\nLxiv(giralda)\n\nSort(giralda, tuckie) and forall x (Sort(x, tuckie) -> Lxiv(x)) -> therefore Lxiv(giralda)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The spud sweeten the osmund. The spud outrival the osmund. The spud press the osmund. The osmund sweeten the spud. The osmund outrival the spud. The osmund is uttermost. The osmund press the spud. If the osmund press the spud and the osmund is carboxyl then the osmund outrival the spud. If something press the spud then it outrival the osmund. If something outrival the osmund then it sweeten the osmund. If something outrival the osmund then the osmund sweeten the spud. If something sweeten the spud then the spud sweeten the osmund. All ballistic things are granted. If something sweeten the osmund then it is granted. Red things are carboxyl. The spud is not granted.", "logic": "\nSweeten(spud, osmund)\nOutrival(spud, osmund)\nPress(spud, osmund)\nSweeten(osmund, spud)\nOutrival(osmund, spud)\nUttermost(osmund)\nPress(osmund, spud)\nPress(osmund, spud) and Carboxyl(osmund) -> Outrival(osmund, spud)\nforall x (Press(x, spud) -> Outrival(x, osmund))\nforall x (Outrival(x, osmund) -> Sweeten(x, osmund))\nforall x (Outrival(x, osmund) -> Sweeten(osmund, spud))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, spud) -> Sweeten(spud, osmund))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Granted(x))\nforall x (Sweeten(x, osmund) -> Granted(x))\nforall x (Ballistic(x) -> Carboxyl(x))\n\nnot Granted(spud)\n\nSweeten(spud, osmund) and forall x (Sweeten(x, osmund) -> Granted(x)) -> therefore Granted(spud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The abigail merit the thaddeus. The abigail embrangle the thaddeus. The abigail parachute the thaddeus. The thaddeus merit the abigail. The thaddeus embrangle the abigail. The thaddeus is indecent. The thaddeus parachute the abigail. If the thaddeus parachute the abigail and the thaddeus is namibian then the thaddeus embrangle the abigail. If something parachute the abigail then it embrangle the thaddeus. If something embrangle the thaddeus then it merit the thaddeus. If something embrangle the thaddeus then the thaddeus merit the abigail. If something merit the abigail then the abigail merit the thaddeus. All testaceous things are causeless. If something merit the thaddeus then it is causeless. Red things are namibian. The thaddeus merit the thaddeus.", "logic": "\nMerit(abigail, thaddeus)\nEmbrangle(abigail, thaddeus)\nParachute(abigail, thaddeus)\nMerit(thaddeus, abigail)\nEmbrangle(thaddeus, abigail)\nIndecent(thaddeus)\nParachute(thaddeus, abigail)\nParachute(thaddeus, abigail) and Namibian(thaddeus) -> Embrangle(thaddeus, abigail)\nforall x (Parachute(x, abigail) -> Embrangle(x, thaddeus))\nforall x (Embrangle(x, thaddeus) -> Merit(x, thaddeus))\nforall x (Embrangle(x, thaddeus) -> Merit(thaddeus, abigail))\nforall x (Merit(x, abigail) -> Merit(abigail, thaddeus))\nforall x (Testaceous(x) -> Causeless(x))\nforall x (Merit(x, thaddeus) -> Causeless(x))\nforall x (Testaceous(x) -> Namibian(x))\n\nMerit(thaddeus, thaddeus)\n\nParachute(thaddeus, abigail) and forall x (Parachute(x, abigail) -> Embrangle(x, thaddeus)) -> therefore Embrangle(thaddeus, thaddeus) Embrangle(thaddeus, thaddeus) and forall x (Embrangle(x, thaddeus) -> Merit(x, thaddeus)) -> therefore Merit(thaddeus, thaddeus)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The jacquelyn seclude the roman. The jacquelyn shanghai the roman. The jacquelyn anathemise the roman. The roman seclude the jacquelyn. The roman shanghai the jacquelyn. The roman is dysphoric. The roman anathemise the jacquelyn. If the roman anathemise the jacquelyn and the roman is organised then the roman shanghai the jacquelyn. If something anathemise the jacquelyn then it shanghai the roman. If something shanghai the roman then it seclude the roman. If something shanghai the roman then the roman seclude the jacquelyn. If something seclude the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn seclude the roman. All nagging things are muciferous. If something seclude the roman then it is muciferous. Red things are organised. The roman does not chase the roman.", "logic": "\nSeclude(jacquelyn, roman)\nShanghai(jacquelyn, roman)\nAnathemise(jacquelyn, roman)\nSeclude(roman, jacquelyn)\nShanghai(roman, jacquelyn)\nDysphoric(roman)\nAnathemise(roman, jacquelyn)\nAnathemise(roman, jacquelyn) and Organised(roman) -> Shanghai(roman, jacquelyn)\nforall x (Anathemise(x, jacquelyn) -> Shanghai(x, roman))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, roman) -> Seclude(x, roman))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, roman) -> Seclude(roman, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Seclude(x, jacquelyn) -> Seclude(jacquelyn, roman))\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Seclude(x, roman) -> Muciferous(x))\nforall x (Nagging(x) -> Organised(x))\n\nnot Seclude(roman, roman)\n\nAnathemise(roman, jacquelyn) and forall x (Anathemise(x, jacquelyn) -> Shanghai(x, roman)) -> therefore Shanghai(roman, roman) Shanghai(roman, roman) and forall x (Shanghai(x, roman) -> Seclude(x, roman)) -> therefore Seclude(roman, roman)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The marylin legalise the rasla. The marylin wrick the rasla. The marylin claver the rasla. The rasla legalise the marylin. The rasla wrick the marylin. The rasla is individual. The rasla claver the marylin. If the rasla claver the marylin and the rasla is nephritic then the rasla wrick the marylin. If something claver the marylin then it wrick the rasla. If something wrick the rasla then it legalise the rasla. If something wrick the rasla then the rasla legalise the marylin. If something legalise the marylin then the marylin legalise the rasla. All tensed things are wily. If something legalise the rasla then it is wily. Red things are nephritic. The rasla is wily.", "logic": "\nLegalise(marylin, rasla)\nWrick(marylin, rasla)\nClaver(marylin, rasla)\nLegalise(rasla, marylin)\nWrick(rasla, marylin)\nIndividual(rasla)\nClaver(rasla, marylin)\nClaver(rasla, marylin) and Nephritic(rasla) -> Wrick(rasla, marylin)\nforall x (Claver(x, marylin) -> Wrick(x, rasla))\nforall x (Wrick(x, rasla) -> Legalise(x, rasla))\nforall x (Wrick(x, rasla) -> Legalise(rasla, marylin))\nforall x (Legalise(x, marylin) -> Legalise(marylin, rasla))\nforall x (Tensed(x) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Legalise(x, rasla) -> Wily(x))\nforall x (Tensed(x) -> Nephritic(x))\n\nWily(rasla)\n\nClaver(rasla, marylin) and forall x (Claver(x, marylin) -> Wrick(x, rasla)) -> therefore Wrick(rasla, rasla) Wrick(rasla, rasla) and forall x (Wrick(x, rasla) -> Legalise(x, rasla)) -> therefore Legalise(rasla, rasla) Legalise(rasla, rasla) and forall x (Legalise(x, rasla) -> Wily(x)) -> therefore Wily(rasla)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The mitzi perjure the yehudi. The mitzi scythe the yehudi. The mitzi vermilion the yehudi. The yehudi perjure the mitzi. The yehudi scythe the mitzi. The yehudi is maddening. The yehudi vermilion the mitzi. If the yehudi vermilion the mitzi and the yehudi is vaccinated then the yehudi scythe the mitzi. If something vermilion the mitzi then it scythe the yehudi. If something scythe the yehudi then it perjure the yehudi. If something scythe the yehudi then the yehudi perjure the mitzi. If something perjure the mitzi then the mitzi perjure the yehudi. All honorable things are drifting. If something perjure the yehudi then it is drifting. Red things are vaccinated. The yehudi is not drifting.", "logic": "\nPerjure(mitzi, yehudi)\nScythe(mitzi, yehudi)\nVermilion(mitzi, yehudi)\nPerjure(yehudi, mitzi)\nScythe(yehudi, mitzi)\nMaddening(yehudi)\nVermilion(yehudi, mitzi)\nVermilion(yehudi, mitzi) and Vaccinated(yehudi) -> Scythe(yehudi, mitzi)\nforall x (Vermilion(x, mitzi) -> Scythe(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Scythe(x, yehudi) -> Perjure(x, yehudi))\nforall x (Scythe(x, yehudi) -> Perjure(yehudi, mitzi))\nforall x (Perjure(x, mitzi) -> Perjure(mitzi, yehudi))\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Perjure(x, yehudi) -> Drifting(x))\nforall x (Honorable(x) -> Vaccinated(x))\n\nnot Drifting(yehudi)\n\nVermilion(yehudi, mitzi) and forall x (Vermilion(x, mitzi) -> Scythe(x, yehudi)) -> therefore Scythe(yehudi, yehudi) Scythe(yehudi, yehudi) and forall x (Scythe(x, yehudi) -> Perjure(x, yehudi)) -> therefore Perjure(yehudi, yehudi) Perjure(yehudi, yehudi) and forall x (Perjure(x, yehudi) -> Drifting(x)) -> therefore Drifting(yehudi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The ronica dandify the marcia. The ronica cannulise the marcia. The ronica pasteurize the marcia. The marcia dandify the ronica. The marcia cannulise the ronica. The marcia is confiscate. The marcia pasteurize the ronica. If the marcia pasteurize the ronica and the marcia is immoveable then the marcia cannulise the ronica. If something pasteurize the ronica then it cannulise the marcia. If something cannulise the marcia then it dandify the marcia. If something cannulise the marcia then the marcia dandify the ronica. If something dandify the ronica then the ronica dandify the marcia. All minor things are homeric. If something dandify the marcia then it is homeric. Red things are immoveable. The marcia is not immoveable.", "logic": "\nDandify(ronica, marcia)\nCannulise(ronica, marcia)\nPasteurize(ronica, marcia)\nDandify(marcia, ronica)\nCannulise(marcia, ronica)\nConfiscate(marcia)\nPasteurize(marcia, ronica)\nPasteurize(marcia, ronica) and Immoveable(marcia) -> Cannulise(marcia, ronica)\nforall x (Pasteurize(x, ronica) -> Cannulise(x, marcia))\nforall x (Cannulise(x, marcia) -> Dandify(x, marcia))\nforall x (Cannulise(x, marcia) -> Dandify(marcia, ronica))\nforall x (Dandify(x, ronica) -> Dandify(ronica, marcia))\nforall x (Minor(x) -> Homeric(x))\nforall x (Dandify(x, marcia) -> Homeric(x))\nforall x (Minor(x) -> Immoveable(x))\n\nnot Immoveable(marcia)\n\nforall x (Minor(x) -> Immoveable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The josiah tabularize the ninetta. The josiah retreat the ninetta. The josiah overdraw the ninetta. The ninetta tabularize the josiah. The ninetta retreat the josiah. The ninetta is shoed. The ninetta overdraw the josiah. If the ninetta overdraw the josiah and the ninetta is unspoiled then the ninetta retreat the josiah. If something overdraw the josiah then it retreat the ninetta. If something retreat the ninetta then it tabularize the ninetta. If something retreat the ninetta then the ninetta tabularize the josiah. If something tabularize the josiah then the josiah tabularize the ninetta. All unlikeable things are embedded. If something tabularize the ninetta then it is embedded. Red things are unspoiled. The josiah is unspoiled.", "logic": "\nTabularize(josiah, ninetta)\nRetreat(josiah, ninetta)\nOverdraw(josiah, ninetta)\nTabularize(ninetta, josiah)\nRetreat(ninetta, josiah)\nShoed(ninetta)\nOverdraw(ninetta, josiah)\nOverdraw(ninetta, josiah) and Unspoiled(ninetta) -> Retreat(ninetta, josiah)\nforall x (Overdraw(x, josiah) -> Retreat(x, ninetta))\nforall x (Retreat(x, ninetta) -> Tabularize(x, ninetta))\nforall x (Retreat(x, ninetta) -> Tabularize(ninetta, josiah))\nforall x (Tabularize(x, josiah) -> Tabularize(josiah, ninetta))\nforall x (Unlikeable(x) -> Embedded(x))\nforall x (Tabularize(x, ninetta) -> Embedded(x))\nforall x (Unlikeable(x) -> Unspoiled(x))\n\nUnspoiled(josiah)\n\nforall x (Unlikeable(x) -> Unspoiled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The isidora consist the templeton. The isidora terminate the templeton. The isidora avulse the templeton. The templeton consist the isidora. The templeton terminate the isidora. The templeton is unironed. The templeton avulse the isidora. If the templeton avulse the isidora and the templeton is arrogant then the templeton terminate the isidora. If something avulse the isidora then it terminate the templeton. If something terminate the templeton then it consist the templeton. If something terminate the templeton then the templeton consist the isidora. If something consist the isidora then the isidora consist the templeton. All becalmed things are chubby. If something consist the templeton then it is chubby. Red things are arrogant. The isidora does not like the isidora.", "logic": "\nConsist(isidora, templeton)\nTerminate(isidora, templeton)\nAvulse(isidora, templeton)\nConsist(templeton, isidora)\nTerminate(templeton, isidora)\nUnironed(templeton)\nAvulse(templeton, isidora)\nAvulse(templeton, isidora) and Arrogant(templeton) -> Terminate(templeton, isidora)\nforall x (Avulse(x, isidora) -> Terminate(x, templeton))\nforall x (Terminate(x, templeton) -> Consist(x, templeton))\nforall x (Terminate(x, templeton) -> Consist(templeton, isidora))\nforall x (Consist(x, isidora) -> Consist(isidora, templeton))\nforall x (Becalmed(x) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Consist(x, templeton) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Becalmed(x) -> Arrogant(x))\n\nnot Avulse(isidora, isidora)\n\nnot Avulse(isidora, isidora) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The risa recopy the thorn. The risa unburden the thorn. The risa expatiate the thorn. The thorn recopy the risa. The thorn unburden the risa. The thorn is syncarpous. The thorn expatiate the risa. If the thorn expatiate the risa and the thorn is adroit then the thorn unburden the risa. If something expatiate the risa then it unburden the thorn. If something unburden the thorn then it recopy the thorn. If something unburden the thorn then the thorn recopy the risa. If something recopy the risa then the risa recopy the thorn. All adjusted things are sterling. If something recopy the thorn then it is sterling. Red things are adroit. The thorn expatiate the thorn.", "logic": "\nRecopy(risa, thorn)\nUnburden(risa, thorn)\nExpatiate(risa, thorn)\nRecopy(thorn, risa)\nUnburden(thorn, risa)\nSyncarpous(thorn)\nExpatiate(thorn, risa)\nExpatiate(thorn, risa) and Adroit(thorn) -> Unburden(thorn, risa)\nforall x (Expatiate(x, risa) -> Unburden(x, thorn))\nforall x (Unburden(x, thorn) -> Recopy(x, thorn))\nforall x (Unburden(x, thorn) -> Recopy(thorn, risa))\nforall x (Recopy(x, risa) -> Recopy(risa, thorn))\nforall x (Adjusted(x) -> Sterling(x))\nforall x (Recopy(x, thorn) -> Sterling(x))\nforall x (Adjusted(x) -> Adroit(x))\n\nExpatiate(thorn, thorn)\n\nExpatiate(thorn, thorn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The larine gall the cristie. The larine mime the cristie. The larine handcolour the cristie. The cristie gall the larine. The cristie mime the larine. The cristie is official. The cristie handcolour the larine. If the cristie handcolour the larine and the cristie is squalling then the cristie mime the larine. If something handcolour the larine then it mime the cristie. If something mime the cristie then it gall the cristie. If something mime the cristie then the cristie gall the larine. If something gall the larine then the larine gall the cristie. All cuneal things are chubby. If something gall the cristie then it is chubby. Red things are squalling. The larine does not chase the larine.", "logic": "\nGall(larine, cristie)\nMime(larine, cristie)\nHandcolour(larine, cristie)\nGall(cristie, larine)\nMime(cristie, larine)\nOfficial(cristie)\nHandcolour(cristie, larine)\nHandcolour(cristie, larine) and Squalling(cristie) -> Mime(cristie, larine)\nforall x (Handcolour(x, larine) -> Mime(x, cristie))\nforall x (Mime(x, cristie) -> Gall(x, cristie))\nforall x (Mime(x, cristie) -> Gall(cristie, larine))\nforall x (Gall(x, larine) -> Gall(larine, cristie))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Gall(x, cristie) -> Chubby(x))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) -> Squalling(x))\n\nnot Gall(larine, larine)\n\nnot Gall(larine, larine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The kermie becharm the elbertina. The kermie abhor the elbertina. The kermie mislay the elbertina. The elbertina becharm the kermie. The elbertina abhor the kermie. The elbertina is queenly. The elbertina mislay the kermie. If the elbertina mislay the kermie and the elbertina is contagious then the elbertina abhor the kermie. If something mislay the kermie then it abhor the elbertina. If something abhor the elbertina then it becharm the elbertina. If something abhor the elbertina then the elbertina becharm the kermie. If something becharm the kermie then the kermie becharm the elbertina. All broadside things are mucky. If something becharm the elbertina then it is mucky. Red things are contagious. The kermie is broadside.", "logic": "\nBecharm(kermie, elbertina)\nAbhor(kermie, elbertina)\nMislay(kermie, elbertina)\nBecharm(elbertina, kermie)\nAbhor(elbertina, kermie)\nQueenly(elbertina)\nMislay(elbertina, kermie)\nMislay(elbertina, kermie) and Contagious(elbertina) -> Abhor(elbertina, kermie)\nforall x (Mislay(x, kermie) -> Abhor(x, elbertina))\nforall x (Abhor(x, elbertina) -> Becharm(x, elbertina))\nforall x (Abhor(x, elbertina) -> Becharm(elbertina, kermie))\nforall x (Becharm(x, kermie) -> Becharm(kermie, elbertina))\nforall x (Broadside(x) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Becharm(x, elbertina) -> Mucky(x))\nforall x (Broadside(x) -> Contagious(x))\n\nBroadside(kermie)\n\nBroadside(kermie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The ettie sulfurette the evita. The ettie exult the evita. The ettie salve the evita. The evita sulfurette the ettie. The evita exult the ettie. The evita is vagrant. The evita salve the ettie. If the evita salve the ettie and the evita is sumatran then the evita exult the ettie. If something salve the ettie then it exult the evita. If something exult the evita then it sulfurette the evita. If something exult the evita then the evita sulfurette the ettie. If something sulfurette the ettie then the ettie sulfurette the evita. All minor things are chondritic. If something sulfurette the evita then it is chondritic. Red things are sumatran. The ettie is not vagrant.", "logic": "\nSulfurette(ettie, evita)\nExult(ettie, evita)\nSalve(ettie, evita)\nSulfurette(evita, ettie)\nExult(evita, ettie)\nVagrant(evita)\nSalve(evita, ettie)\nSalve(evita, ettie) and Sumatran(evita) -> Exult(evita, ettie)\nforall x (Salve(x, ettie) -> Exult(x, evita))\nforall x (Exult(x, evita) -> Sulfurette(x, evita))\nforall x (Exult(x, evita) -> Sulfurette(evita, ettie))\nforall x (Sulfurette(x, ettie) -> Sulfurette(ettie, evita))\nforall x (Minor(x) -> Chondritic(x))\nforall x (Sulfurette(x, evita) -> Chondritic(x))\nforall x (Minor(x) -> Sumatran(x))\n\nnot Vagrant(ettie)\n\nnot Vagrant(ettie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The shaina eternise the aida. The shaina fluoridize the aida. The shaina hose the aida. The aida eternise the shaina. The aida fluoridize the shaina. The aida is aslope. The aida hose the shaina. If the aida hose the shaina and the aida is loveless then the aida fluoridize the shaina. If something hose the shaina then it fluoridize the aida. If something fluoridize the aida then it eternise the aida. If something fluoridize the aida then the aida eternise the shaina. If something eternise the shaina then the shaina eternise the aida. All bewitching things are eudaemonic. If something eternise the aida then it is eudaemonic. Red things are loveless. The shaina fluoridize the shaina.", "logic": "\nEternise(shaina, aida)\nFluoridize(shaina, aida)\nHose(shaina, aida)\nEternise(aida, shaina)\nFluoridize(aida, shaina)\nAslope(aida)\nHose(aida, shaina)\nHose(aida, shaina) and Loveless(aida) -> Fluoridize(aida, shaina)\nforall x (Hose(x, shaina) -> Fluoridize(x, aida))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, aida) -> Eternise(x, aida))\nforall x (Fluoridize(x, aida) -> Eternise(aida, shaina))\nforall x (Eternise(x, shaina) -> Eternise(shaina, aida))\nforall x (Bewitching(x) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nforall x (Eternise(x, aida) -> Eudaemonic(x))\nforall x (Bewitching(x) -> Loveless(x))\n\nFluoridize(shaina, shaina)\n\nFluoridize(shaina, shaina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1387"} {"premises": "The yankee is lacerate. The yankee is tillable. The yankee is obese. The yankee mercerize the langston. The yankee limn the langston. The yankee decolour the langston. The langston is ultimo. The langston is pocketable. The langston limn the yankee. The langston decolour the yankee. If someone decolour the langston then the langston mercerize the yankee. If the langston limn the yankee and the yankee is tillable then the langston mercerize the yankee. If someone is pocketable and they see the yankee then they need the langston. If someone decolour the langston and the langston mercerize the yankee then the yankee is ultimo. If the langston decolour the yankee and the yankee is lacerate then the langston is obese. If someone is ultimo then they need the yankee. The yankee is obese.", "logic": "\nLacerate(yankee)\nTillable(yankee)\nObese(yankee)\nMercerize(yankee, langston)\nLimn(yankee, langston)\nDecolour(yankee, langston)\nUltimo(langston)\nPocketable(langston)\nLimn(langston, yankee)\nDecolour(langston, yankee)\nforall x (Decolour(x, langston) -> Mercerize(langston, yankee))\nLimn(langston, yankee) and Tillable(yankee) -> Mercerize(langston, yankee)\nforall x (Pocketable(x) and Limn(x, yankee) -> Mercerize(x, langston))\nforall x (Decolour(x, langston) and Mercerize(langston, yankee) -> Ultimo(yankee))\nDecolour(langston, yankee) and Lacerate(yankee) -> Obese(langston)\nforall x (Ultimo(x) -> Mercerize(x, yankee))\n\nObese(yankee)\n\ntherefore Obese(yankee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The noach is blushing. The noach is unchanged. The noach is epistolary. The noach believe the frederik. The noach squelch the frederik. The noach unknot the frederik. The frederik is stewed. The frederik is insensible. The frederik squelch the noach. The frederik unknot the noach. If someone unknot the frederik then the frederik believe the noach. If the frederik squelch the noach and the noach is unchanged then the frederik believe the noach. If someone is insensible and they see the noach then they need the frederik. If someone unknot the frederik and the frederik believe the noach then the noach is stewed. If the frederik unknot the noach and the noach is blushing then the frederik is epistolary. If someone is stewed then they need the noach. The noach does not visit the frederik.", "logic": "\nBlushing(noach)\nUnchanged(noach)\nEpistolary(noach)\nBelieve(noach, frederik)\nSquelch(noach, frederik)\nUnknot(noach, frederik)\nStewed(frederik)\nInsensible(frederik)\nSquelch(frederik, noach)\nUnknot(frederik, noach)\nforall x (Unknot(x, frederik) -> Believe(frederik, noach))\nSquelch(frederik, noach) and Unchanged(noach) -> Believe(frederik, noach)\nforall x (Insensible(x) and Squelch(x, noach) -> Believe(x, frederik))\nforall x (Unknot(x, frederik) and Believe(frederik, noach) -> Stewed(noach))\nUnknot(frederik, noach) and Blushing(noach) -> Epistolary(frederik)\nforall x (Stewed(x) -> Believe(x, noach))\n\nnot Unknot(noach, frederik)\n\ntherefore Unknot(noach, frederik)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The sharon is reinforced. The sharon is ancestral. The sharon is cankerous. The sharon cinematise the gwenette. The sharon bloody the gwenette. The sharon crenellate the gwenette. The gwenette is fearsome. The gwenette is demode. The gwenette bloody the sharon. The gwenette crenellate the sharon. If someone crenellate the gwenette then the gwenette cinematise the sharon. If the gwenette bloody the sharon and the sharon is ancestral then the gwenette cinematise the sharon. If someone is demode and they see the sharon then they need the gwenette. If someone crenellate the gwenette and the gwenette cinematise the sharon then the sharon is fearsome. If the gwenette crenellate the sharon and the sharon is reinforced then the gwenette is cankerous. If someone is fearsome then they need the sharon. The gwenette cinematise the gwenette.", "logic": "\nReinforced(sharon)\nAncestral(sharon)\nCankerous(sharon)\nCinematise(sharon, gwenette)\nBloody(sharon, gwenette)\nCrenellate(sharon, gwenette)\nFearsome(gwenette)\nDemode(gwenette)\nBloody(gwenette, sharon)\nCrenellate(gwenette, sharon)\nforall x (Crenellate(x, gwenette) -> Cinematise(gwenette, sharon))\nBloody(gwenette, sharon) and Ancestral(sharon) -> Cinematise(gwenette, sharon)\nforall x (Demode(x) and Bloody(x, sharon) -> Cinematise(x, gwenette))\nforall x (Crenellate(x, gwenette) and Cinematise(gwenette, sharon) -> Fearsome(sharon))\nCrenellate(gwenette, sharon) and Reinforced(sharon) -> Cankerous(gwenette)\nforall x (Fearsome(x) -> Cinematise(x, sharon))\n\nCinematise(gwenette, gwenette)\n\nDemode(gwenette) and Bloody(gwenette, sharon) and forall x (Demode(x) and Bloody(x, sharon) -> Cinematise(x, gwenette)) -> therefore Cinematise(gwenette, gwenette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The sergei is iridic. The sergei is enteral. The sergei is lecherous. The sergei depute the estelle. The sergei ratchet the estelle. The sergei assonate the estelle. The estelle is wanton. The estelle is eremitical. The estelle ratchet the sergei. The estelle assonate the sergei. If someone assonate the estelle then the estelle depute the sergei. If the estelle ratchet the sergei and the sergei is enteral then the estelle depute the sergei. If someone is eremitical and they see the sergei then they need the estelle. If someone assonate the estelle and the estelle depute the sergei then the sergei is wanton. If the estelle assonate the sergei and the sergei is iridic then the estelle is lecherous. If someone is wanton then they need the sergei. The estelle does not need the sergei.", "logic": "\nIridic(sergei)\nEnteral(sergei)\nLecherous(sergei)\nDepute(sergei, estelle)\nRatchet(sergei, estelle)\nAssonate(sergei, estelle)\nWanton(estelle)\nEremitical(estelle)\nRatchet(estelle, sergei)\nAssonate(estelle, sergei)\nforall x (Assonate(x, estelle) -> Depute(estelle, sergei))\nRatchet(estelle, sergei) and Enteral(sergei) -> Depute(estelle, sergei)\nforall x (Eremitical(x) and Ratchet(x, sergei) -> Depute(x, estelle))\nforall x (Assonate(x, estelle) and Depute(estelle, sergei) -> Wanton(sergei))\nAssonate(estelle, sergei) and Iridic(sergei) -> Lecherous(estelle)\nforall x (Wanton(x) -> Depute(x, sergei))\n\nnot Depute(estelle, sergei)\n\nAssonate(sergei, estelle) and forall x (Assonate(x, estelle) -> Depute(estelle, sergei)) -> therefore Depute(estelle, sergei)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The dwayne is nutlike. The dwayne is peevish. The dwayne is homeric. The dwayne grimace the dorise. The dwayne sensitise the dorise. The dwayne hatch the dorise. The dorise is rugged. The dorise is decisive. The dorise sensitise the dwayne. The dorise hatch the dwayne. If someone hatch the dorise then the dorise grimace the dwayne. If the dorise sensitise the dwayne and the dwayne is peevish then the dorise grimace the dwayne. If someone is decisive and they see the dwayne then they need the dorise. If someone hatch the dorise and the dorise grimace the dwayne then the dwayne is rugged. If the dorise hatch the dwayne and the dwayne is nutlike then the dorise is homeric. If someone is rugged then they need the dwayne. The dwayne is rugged.", "logic": "\nNutlike(dwayne)\nPeevish(dwayne)\nHomeric(dwayne)\nGrimace(dwayne, dorise)\nSensitise(dwayne, dorise)\nHatch(dwayne, dorise)\nRugged(dorise)\nDecisive(dorise)\nSensitise(dorise, dwayne)\nHatch(dorise, dwayne)\nforall x (Hatch(x, dorise) -> Grimace(dorise, dwayne))\nSensitise(dorise, dwayne) and Peevish(dwayne) -> Grimace(dorise, dwayne)\nforall x (Decisive(x) and Sensitise(x, dwayne) -> Grimace(x, dorise))\nforall x (Hatch(x, dorise) and Grimace(dorise, dwayne) -> Rugged(dwayne))\nHatch(dorise, dwayne) and Nutlike(dwayne) -> Homeric(dorise)\nforall x (Rugged(x) -> Grimace(x, dwayne))\n\nRugged(dwayne)\n\nHatch(dwayne, dorise) and forall x (Hatch(x, dorise) -> Grimace(dorise, dwayne)) -> therefore Grimace(dorise, dwayne) Hatch(dwayne, dorise) and Grimace(dorise, dwayne) and forall x (Hatch(x, dorise) and Grimace(dorise, dwayne) -> Rugged(dwayne)) -> therefore Rugged(dwayne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The emmey is fortieth. The emmey is hirsute. The emmey is statuary. The emmey resettle the deana. The emmey blot the deana. The emmey lean the deana. The deana is reconciled. The deana is lxxxviii. The deana blot the emmey. The deana lean the emmey. If someone lean the deana then the deana resettle the emmey. If the deana blot the emmey and the emmey is hirsute then the deana resettle the emmey. If someone is lxxxviii and they see the emmey then they need the deana. If someone lean the deana and the deana resettle the emmey then the emmey is reconciled. If the deana lean the emmey and the emmey is fortieth then the deana is statuary. If someone is reconciled then they need the emmey. The emmey is not reconciled.", "logic": "\nFortieth(emmey)\nHirsute(emmey)\nStatuary(emmey)\nResettle(emmey, deana)\nBlot(emmey, deana)\nLean(emmey, deana)\nReconciled(deana)\nLxxxviii(deana)\nBlot(deana, emmey)\nLean(deana, emmey)\nforall x (Lean(x, deana) -> Resettle(deana, emmey))\nBlot(deana, emmey) and Hirsute(emmey) -> Resettle(deana, emmey)\nforall x (Lxxxviii(x) and Blot(x, emmey) -> Resettle(x, deana))\nforall x (Lean(x, deana) and Resettle(deana, emmey) -> Reconciled(emmey))\nLean(deana, emmey) and Fortieth(emmey) -> Statuary(deana)\nforall x (Reconciled(x) -> Resettle(x, emmey))\n\nnot Reconciled(emmey)\n\nLean(emmey, deana) and forall x (Lean(x, deana) -> Resettle(deana, emmey)) -> therefore Resettle(deana, emmey) Lean(emmey, deana) and Resettle(deana, emmey) and forall x (Lean(x, deana) and Resettle(deana, emmey) -> Reconciled(emmey)) -> therefore Reconciled(emmey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The selie is underhand. The selie is afebrile. The selie is hematal. The selie cramp the aimil. The selie bend the aimil. The selie terrace the aimil. The aimil is crumpled. The aimil is proficient. The aimil bend the selie. The aimil terrace the selie. If someone terrace the aimil then the aimil cramp the selie. If the aimil bend the selie and the selie is afebrile then the aimil cramp the selie. If someone is proficient and they see the selie then they need the aimil. If someone terrace the aimil and the aimil cramp the selie then the selie is crumpled. If the aimil terrace the selie and the selie is underhand then the aimil is hematal. If someone is crumpled then they need the selie. The selie cramp the selie.", "logic": "\nUnderhand(selie)\nAfebrile(selie)\nHematal(selie)\nCramp(selie, aimil)\nBend(selie, aimil)\nTerrace(selie, aimil)\nCrumpled(aimil)\nProficient(aimil)\nBend(aimil, selie)\nTerrace(aimil, selie)\nforall x (Terrace(x, aimil) -> Cramp(aimil, selie))\nBend(aimil, selie) and Afebrile(selie) -> Cramp(aimil, selie)\nforall x (Proficient(x) and Bend(x, selie) -> Cramp(x, aimil))\nforall x (Terrace(x, aimil) and Cramp(aimil, selie) -> Crumpled(selie))\nTerrace(aimil, selie) and Underhand(selie) -> Hematal(aimil)\nforall x (Crumpled(x) -> Cramp(x, selie))\n\nCramp(selie, selie)\n\nTerrace(selie, aimil) and forall x (Terrace(x, aimil) -> Cramp(aimil, selie)) -> therefore Cramp(aimil, selie) Terrace(selie, aimil) and Cramp(aimil, selie) and forall x (Terrace(x, aimil) and Cramp(aimil, selie) -> Crumpled(selie)) -> therefore Crumpled(selie) Crumpled(selie) and forall x (Crumpled(x) -> Cramp(x, selie)) -> therefore Cramp(selie, selie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The michale is brainy. The michale is genoese. The michale is albinal. The michale bruise the molli. The michale tender the molli. The michale total the molli. The molli is rearing. The molli is sanitized. The molli tender the michale. The molli total the michale. If someone total the molli then the molli bruise the michale. If the molli tender the michale and the michale is genoese then the molli bruise the michale. If someone is sanitized and they see the michale then they need the molli. If someone total the molli and the molli bruise the michale then the michale is rearing. If the molli total the michale and the michale is brainy then the molli is albinal. If someone is rearing then they need the michale. The michale does not need the michale.", "logic": "\nBrainy(michale)\nGenoese(michale)\nAlbinal(michale)\nBruise(michale, molli)\nTender(michale, molli)\nTotal(michale, molli)\nRearing(molli)\nSanitized(molli)\nTender(molli, michale)\nTotal(molli, michale)\nforall x (Total(x, molli) -> Bruise(molli, michale))\nTender(molli, michale) and Genoese(michale) -> Bruise(molli, michale)\nforall x (Sanitized(x) and Tender(x, michale) -> Bruise(x, molli))\nforall x (Total(x, molli) and Bruise(molli, michale) -> Rearing(michale))\nTotal(molli, michale) and Brainy(michale) -> Albinal(molli)\nforall x (Rearing(x) -> Bruise(x, michale))\n\nnot Bruise(michale, michale)\n\nTotal(michale, molli) and forall x (Total(x, molli) -> Bruise(molli, michale)) -> therefore Bruise(molli, michale) Total(michale, molli) and Bruise(molli, michale) and forall x (Total(x, molli) and Bruise(molli, michale) -> Rearing(michale)) -> therefore Rearing(michale) Rearing(michale) and forall x (Rearing(x) -> Bruise(x, michale)) -> therefore Bruise(michale, michale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The herrmann is blushing. The herrmann is accordant. The herrmann is affluent. The herrmann unhallow the ruben. The herrmann scratch the ruben. The herrmann sidestep the ruben. The ruben is unexceeded. The ruben is fecal. The ruben scratch the herrmann. The ruben sidestep the herrmann. If someone sidestep the ruben then the ruben unhallow the herrmann. If the ruben scratch the herrmann and the herrmann is accordant then the ruben unhallow the herrmann. If someone is fecal and they see the herrmann then they need the ruben. If someone sidestep the ruben and the ruben unhallow the herrmann then the herrmann is unexceeded. If the ruben sidestep the herrmann and the herrmann is blushing then the ruben is affluent. If someone is unexceeded then they need the herrmann. The ruben does not visit the ruben.", "logic": "\nBlushing(herrmann)\nAccordant(herrmann)\nAffluent(herrmann)\nUnhallow(herrmann, ruben)\nScratch(herrmann, ruben)\nSidestep(herrmann, ruben)\nUnexceeded(ruben)\nFecal(ruben)\nScratch(ruben, herrmann)\nSidestep(ruben, herrmann)\nforall x (Sidestep(x, ruben) -> Unhallow(ruben, herrmann))\nScratch(ruben, herrmann) and Accordant(herrmann) -> Unhallow(ruben, herrmann)\nforall x (Fecal(x) and Scratch(x, herrmann) -> Unhallow(x, ruben))\nforall x (Sidestep(x, ruben) and Unhallow(ruben, herrmann) -> Unexceeded(herrmann))\nSidestep(ruben, herrmann) and Blushing(herrmann) -> Affluent(ruben)\nforall x (Unexceeded(x) -> Unhallow(x, herrmann))\n\nnot Sidestep(ruben, ruben)\n\nnot Sidestep(ruben, ruben) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The donetta is armorial. The donetta is overblown. The donetta is incoherent. The donetta blueprint the chevy. The donetta ensue the chevy. The donetta autotomise the chevy. The chevy is jamesian. The chevy is flatbottom. The chevy ensue the donetta. The chevy autotomise the donetta. If someone autotomise the chevy then the chevy blueprint the donetta. If the chevy ensue the donetta and the donetta is overblown then the chevy blueprint the donetta. If someone is flatbottom and they see the donetta then they need the chevy. If someone autotomise the chevy and the chevy blueprint the donetta then the donetta is jamesian. If the chevy autotomise the donetta and the donetta is armorial then the chevy is incoherent. If someone is jamesian then they need the donetta. The chevy is overblown.", "logic": "\nArmorial(donetta)\nOverblown(donetta)\nIncoherent(donetta)\nBlueprint(donetta, chevy)\nEnsue(donetta, chevy)\nAutotomise(donetta, chevy)\nJamesian(chevy)\nFlatbottom(chevy)\nEnsue(chevy, donetta)\nAutotomise(chevy, donetta)\nforall x (Autotomise(x, chevy) -> Blueprint(chevy, donetta))\nEnsue(chevy, donetta) and Overblown(donetta) -> Blueprint(chevy, donetta)\nforall x (Flatbottom(x) and Ensue(x, donetta) -> Blueprint(x, chevy))\nforall x (Autotomise(x, chevy) and Blueprint(chevy, donetta) -> Jamesian(donetta))\nAutotomise(chevy, donetta) and Armorial(donetta) -> Incoherent(chevy)\nforall x (Jamesian(x) -> Blueprint(x, donetta))\n\nOverblown(chevy)\n\nOverblown(chevy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The belita is dipped. The belita is fertile. The belita is attenuated. The belita ripen the cecile. The belita savage the cecile. The belita moulder the cecile. The cecile is lxxxv. The cecile is talented. The cecile savage the belita. The cecile moulder the belita. If someone moulder the cecile then the cecile ripen the belita. If the cecile savage the belita and the belita is fertile then the cecile ripen the belita. If someone is talented and they see the belita then they need the cecile. If someone moulder the cecile and the cecile ripen the belita then the belita is lxxxv. If the cecile moulder the belita and the belita is dipped then the cecile is attenuated. If someone is lxxxv then they need the belita. The belita does not visit the belita.", "logic": "\nDipped(belita)\nFertile(belita)\nAttenuated(belita)\nRipen(belita, cecile)\nSavage(belita, cecile)\nMoulder(belita, cecile)\nLxxxv(cecile)\nTalented(cecile)\nSavage(cecile, belita)\nMoulder(cecile, belita)\nforall x (Moulder(x, cecile) -> Ripen(cecile, belita))\nSavage(cecile, belita) and Fertile(belita) -> Ripen(cecile, belita)\nforall x (Talented(x) and Savage(x, belita) -> Ripen(x, cecile))\nforall x (Moulder(x, cecile) and Ripen(cecile, belita) -> Lxxxv(belita))\nMoulder(cecile, belita) and Dipped(belita) -> Attenuated(cecile)\nforall x (Lxxxv(x) -> Ripen(x, belita))\n\nnot Moulder(belita, belita)\n\nnot Moulder(belita, belita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The ferne is infeasible. The ferne is coronary. The ferne is latinate. The ferne wallpaper the essa. The ferne last the essa. The ferne effeminise the essa. The essa is baptistic. The essa is oaten. The essa last the ferne. The essa effeminise the ferne. If someone effeminise the essa then the essa wallpaper the ferne. If the essa last the ferne and the ferne is coronary then the essa wallpaper the ferne. If someone is oaten and they see the ferne then they need the essa. If someone effeminise the essa and the essa wallpaper the ferne then the ferne is baptistic. If the essa effeminise the ferne and the ferne is infeasible then the essa is latinate. If someone is baptistic then they need the ferne. The ferne is oaten.", "logic": "\nInfeasible(ferne)\nCoronary(ferne)\nLatinate(ferne)\nWallpaper(ferne, essa)\nLast(ferne, essa)\nEffeminise(ferne, essa)\nBaptistic(essa)\nOaten(essa)\nLast(essa, ferne)\nEffeminise(essa, ferne)\nforall x (Effeminise(x, essa) -> Wallpaper(essa, ferne))\nLast(essa, ferne) and Coronary(ferne) -> Wallpaper(essa, ferne)\nforall x (Oaten(x) and Last(x, ferne) -> Wallpaper(x, essa))\nforall x (Effeminise(x, essa) and Wallpaper(essa, ferne) -> Baptistic(ferne))\nEffeminise(essa, ferne) and Infeasible(ferne) -> Latinate(essa)\nforall x (Baptistic(x) -> Wallpaper(x, ferne))\n\nOaten(ferne)\n\nOaten(ferne) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The hattie is nude. The hattie is unabated. The hattie is littoral. The hattie wallpaper the luelle. The hattie coalesce the luelle. The hattie gird the luelle. The luelle is parky. The luelle is manageable. The luelle coalesce the hattie. The luelle gird the hattie. If someone gird the luelle then the luelle wallpaper the hattie. If the luelle coalesce the hattie and the hattie is unabated then the luelle wallpaper the hattie. If someone is manageable and they see the hattie then they need the luelle. If someone gird the luelle and the luelle wallpaper the hattie then the hattie is parky. If the luelle gird the hattie and the hattie is nude then the luelle is littoral. If someone is parky then they need the hattie. The hattie does not see the hattie.", "logic": "\nNude(hattie)\nUnabated(hattie)\nLittoral(hattie)\nWallpaper(hattie, luelle)\nCoalesce(hattie, luelle)\nGird(hattie, luelle)\nParky(luelle)\nManageable(luelle)\nCoalesce(luelle, hattie)\nGird(luelle, hattie)\nforall x (Gird(x, luelle) -> Wallpaper(luelle, hattie))\nCoalesce(luelle, hattie) and Unabated(hattie) -> Wallpaper(luelle, hattie)\nforall x (Manageable(x) and Coalesce(x, hattie) -> Wallpaper(x, luelle))\nforall x (Gird(x, luelle) and Wallpaper(luelle, hattie) -> Parky(hattie))\nGird(luelle, hattie) and Nude(hattie) -> Littoral(luelle)\nforall x (Parky(x) -> Wallpaper(x, hattie))\n\nnot Coalesce(hattie, hattie)\n\nnot Coalesce(hattie, hattie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The mikel is undeniable. The mikel is damascene. The mikel is modernized. The mikel graft the tim. The mikel cricket the tim. The mikel backlash the tim. The tim is elapsed. The tim is swaybacked. The tim cricket the mikel. The tim backlash the mikel. If someone backlash the tim then the tim graft the mikel. If the tim cricket the mikel and the mikel is damascene then the tim graft the mikel. If someone is swaybacked and they see the mikel then they need the tim. If someone backlash the tim and the tim graft the mikel then the mikel is elapsed. If the tim backlash the mikel and the mikel is undeniable then the tim is modernized. If someone is elapsed then they need the mikel. The tim is undeniable.", "logic": "\nUndeniable(mikel)\nDamascene(mikel)\nModernized(mikel)\nGraft(mikel, tim)\nCricket(mikel, tim)\nBacklash(mikel, tim)\nElapsed(tim)\nSwaybacked(tim)\nCricket(tim, mikel)\nBacklash(tim, mikel)\nforall x (Backlash(x, tim) -> Graft(tim, mikel))\nCricket(tim, mikel) and Damascene(mikel) -> Graft(tim, mikel)\nforall x (Swaybacked(x) and Cricket(x, mikel) -> Graft(x, tim))\nforall x (Backlash(x, tim) and Graft(tim, mikel) -> Elapsed(mikel))\nBacklash(tim, mikel) and Undeniable(mikel) -> Modernized(tim)\nforall x (Elapsed(x) -> Graft(x, mikel))\n\nUndeniable(tim)\n\nUndeniable(tim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-975"} {"premises": "The livia finalize the auguste. The davey is not unsavory. The auguste weight the livia. If someone is scalable and they need the auguste then the auguste does not need the livia. If someone backcross the davey then they are rococo. If the auguste weight the livia then the auguste backcross the davey. If the davey does not like the livia then the davey is not scalable. If the livia weight the davey then the livia does not like the auguste. If someone is chargeable and they like the davey then the davey backcross the auguste. If someone is rococo then they like the davey. If someone is rococo then they need the davey. The davey is not unsavory.", "logic": "\nFinalize(livia, auguste)\nnot Unsavory(davey)\nWeight(auguste, livia)\nforall x (Scalable(x) and Backcross(x, auguste) -> not Backcross(auguste, livia))\nforall x (Backcross(x, davey) -> Rococo(x))\nWeight(auguste, livia) -> Backcross(auguste, davey)\nnot Weight(davey, livia) -> not Scalable(davey)\nWeight(livia, davey) -> not Weight(livia, auguste)\nforall x (Chargeable(x) and Weight(x, davey) -> Backcross(davey, auguste))\nforall x (Rococo(x) -> Weight(x, davey))\nforall x (Rococo(x) -> Backcross(x, davey))\n\nnot Unsavory(davey)\n\ntherefore not Unsavory(davey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The celesta wanton the channa. The mercie is not russet. The channa cost the celesta. If someone is rimeless and they need the channa then the channa does not need the celesta. If someone observe the mercie then they are impassable. If the channa cost the celesta then the channa observe the mercie. If the mercie does not like the celesta then the mercie is not rimeless. If the celesta cost the mercie then the celesta does not like the channa. If someone is pockmarked and they like the mercie then the mercie observe the channa. If someone is impassable then they like the mercie. If someone is impassable then they need the mercie. The celesta does not see the channa.", "logic": "\nWanton(celesta, channa)\nnot Russet(mercie)\nCost(channa, celesta)\nforall x (Rimeless(x) and Observe(x, channa) -> not Observe(channa, celesta))\nforall x (Observe(x, mercie) -> Impassable(x))\nCost(channa, celesta) -> Observe(channa, mercie)\nnot Cost(mercie, celesta) -> not Rimeless(mercie)\nCost(celesta, mercie) -> not Cost(celesta, channa)\nforall x (Pockmarked(x) and Cost(x, mercie) -> Observe(mercie, channa))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Cost(x, mercie))\nforall x (Impassable(x) -> Observe(x, mercie))\n\nnot Wanton(celesta, channa)\n\ntherefore Wanton(celesta, channa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The jacques yearn the teresa. The alphonse is not arenaceous. The teresa boast the jacques. If someone is xxviii and they need the teresa then the teresa does not need the jacques. If someone respond the alphonse then they are trilled. If the teresa boast the jacques then the teresa respond the alphonse. If the alphonse does not like the jacques then the alphonse is not xxviii. If the jacques boast the alphonse then the jacques does not like the teresa. If someone is prescient and they like the alphonse then the alphonse respond the teresa. If someone is trilled then they like the alphonse. If someone is trilled then they need the alphonse. The teresa respond the alphonse.", "logic": "\nYearn(jacques, teresa)\nnot Arenaceous(alphonse)\nBoast(teresa, jacques)\nforall x (Xxviii(x) and Respond(x, teresa) -> not Respond(teresa, jacques))\nforall x (Respond(x, alphonse) -> Trilled(x))\nBoast(teresa, jacques) -> Respond(teresa, alphonse)\nnot Boast(alphonse, jacques) -> not Xxviii(alphonse)\nBoast(jacques, alphonse) -> not Boast(jacques, teresa)\nforall x (Prescient(x) and Boast(x, alphonse) -> Respond(alphonse, teresa))\nforall x (Trilled(x) -> Boast(x, alphonse))\nforall x (Trilled(x) -> Respond(x, alphonse))\n\nRespond(teresa, alphonse)\n\nBoast(teresa, jacques) and Boast(teresa, jacques) -> Respond(teresa, alphonse) -> therefore Respond(teresa, alphonse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The hynda tickle the shoshanna. The eda is not unlined. The shoshanna incinerate the hynda. If someone is cetaceous and they need the shoshanna then the shoshanna does not need the hynda. If someone suction the eda then they are substitute. If the shoshanna incinerate the hynda then the shoshanna suction the eda. If the eda does not like the hynda then the eda is not cetaceous. If the hynda incinerate the eda then the hynda does not like the shoshanna. If someone is unreformed and they like the eda then the eda suction the shoshanna. If someone is substitute then they like the eda. If someone is substitute then they need the eda. The shoshanna does not need the eda.", "logic": "\nTickle(hynda, shoshanna)\nnot Unlined(eda)\nIncinerate(shoshanna, hynda)\nforall x (Cetaceous(x) and Suction(x, shoshanna) -> not Suction(shoshanna, hynda))\nforall x (Suction(x, eda) -> Substitute(x))\nIncinerate(shoshanna, hynda) -> Suction(shoshanna, eda)\nnot Incinerate(eda, hynda) -> not Cetaceous(eda)\nIncinerate(hynda, eda) -> not Incinerate(hynda, shoshanna)\nforall x (Unreformed(x) and Incinerate(x, eda) -> Suction(eda, shoshanna))\nforall x (Substitute(x) -> Incinerate(x, eda))\nforall x (Substitute(x) -> Suction(x, eda))\n\nnot Suction(shoshanna, eda)\n\nIncinerate(shoshanna, hynda) and Incinerate(shoshanna, hynda) -> Suction(shoshanna, eda) -> therefore Suction(shoshanna, eda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The conni reprimand the vicki. The caria is not unbuttoned. The vicki define the conni. If someone is frayed and they need the vicki then the vicki does not need the conni. If someone wiretap the caria then they are gladsome. If the vicki define the conni then the vicki wiretap the caria. If the caria does not like the conni then the caria is not frayed. If the conni define the caria then the conni does not like the vicki. If someone is touching and they like the caria then the caria wiretap the vicki. If someone is gladsome then they like the caria. If someone is gladsome then they need the caria. The vicki is gladsome.", "logic": "\nReprimand(conni, vicki)\nnot Unbuttoned(caria)\nDefine(vicki, conni)\nforall x (Frayed(x) and Wiretap(x, vicki) -> not Wiretap(vicki, conni))\nforall x (Wiretap(x, caria) -> Gladsome(x))\nDefine(vicki, conni) -> Wiretap(vicki, caria)\nnot Define(caria, conni) -> not Frayed(caria)\nDefine(conni, caria) -> not Define(conni, vicki)\nforall x (Touching(x) and Define(x, caria) -> Wiretap(caria, vicki))\nforall x (Gladsome(x) -> Define(x, caria))\nforall x (Gladsome(x) -> Wiretap(x, caria))\n\nGladsome(vicki)\n\nDefine(vicki, conni) and Define(vicki, conni) -> Wiretap(vicki, caria) -> therefore Wiretap(vicki, caria) Wiretap(vicki, caria) and forall x (Wiretap(x, caria) -> Gladsome(x)) -> therefore Gladsome(vicki)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The tailor blaspheme the hamid. The jude is not whitish. The hamid fall the tailor. If someone is spirited and they need the hamid then the hamid does not need the tailor. If someone defrost the jude then they are congested. If the hamid fall the tailor then the hamid defrost the jude. If the jude does not like the tailor then the jude is not spirited. If the tailor fall the jude then the tailor does not like the hamid. If someone is polemic and they like the jude then the jude defrost the hamid. If someone is congested then they like the jude. If someone is congested then they need the jude. The hamid is not congested.", "logic": "\nBlaspheme(tailor, hamid)\nnot Whitish(jude)\nFall(hamid, tailor)\nforall x (Spirited(x) and Defrost(x, hamid) -> not Defrost(hamid, tailor))\nforall x (Defrost(x, jude) -> Congested(x))\nFall(hamid, tailor) -> Defrost(hamid, jude)\nnot Fall(jude, tailor) -> not Spirited(jude)\nFall(tailor, jude) -> not Fall(tailor, hamid)\nforall x (Polemic(x) and Fall(x, jude) -> Defrost(jude, hamid))\nforall x (Congested(x) -> Fall(x, jude))\nforall x (Congested(x) -> Defrost(x, jude))\n\nnot Congested(hamid)\n\nFall(hamid, tailor) and Fall(hamid, tailor) -> Defrost(hamid, jude) -> therefore Defrost(hamid, jude) Defrost(hamid, jude) and forall x (Defrost(x, jude) -> Congested(x)) -> therefore Congested(hamid)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The fiann dinge the pablo. The lesli is not convergent. The pablo consent the fiann. If someone is euphonious and they need the pablo then the pablo does not need the fiann. If someone exposit the lesli then they are daisylike. If the pablo consent the fiann then the pablo exposit the lesli. If the lesli does not like the fiann then the lesli is not euphonious. If the fiann consent the lesli then the fiann does not like the pablo. If someone is washy and they like the lesli then the lesli exposit the pablo. If someone is daisylike then they like the lesli. If someone is daisylike then they need the lesli. The pablo consent the lesli.", "logic": "\nDinge(fiann, pablo)\nnot Convergent(lesli)\nConsent(pablo, fiann)\nforall x (Euphonious(x) and Exposit(x, pablo) -> not Exposit(pablo, fiann))\nforall x (Exposit(x, lesli) -> Daisylike(x))\nConsent(pablo, fiann) -> Exposit(pablo, lesli)\nnot Consent(lesli, fiann) -> not Euphonious(lesli)\nConsent(fiann, lesli) -> not Consent(fiann, pablo)\nforall x (Washy(x) and Consent(x, lesli) -> Exposit(lesli, pablo))\nforall x (Daisylike(x) -> Consent(x, lesli))\nforall x (Daisylike(x) -> Exposit(x, lesli))\n\nConsent(pablo, lesli)\n\nConsent(pablo, fiann) and Consent(pablo, fiann) -> Exposit(pablo, lesli) -> therefore Exposit(pablo, lesli) Exposit(pablo, lesli) and forall x (Exposit(x, lesli) -> Daisylike(x)) -> therefore Daisylike(pablo) Daisylike(pablo) and forall x (Daisylike(x) -> Consent(x, lesli)) -> therefore Consent(pablo, lesli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The cristie suppurate the vail. The vania is not dedicated. The vail embed the cristie. If someone is corneal and they need the vail then the vail does not need the cristie. If someone bosom the vania then they are dejected. If the vail embed the cristie then the vail bosom the vania. If the vania does not like the cristie then the vania is not corneal. If the cristie embed the vania then the cristie does not like the vail. If someone is grumous and they like the vania then the vania bosom the vail. If someone is dejected then they like the vania. If someone is dejected then they need the vania. The vail does not like the vania.", "logic": "\nSuppurate(cristie, vail)\nnot Dedicated(vania)\nEmbed(vail, cristie)\nforall x (Corneal(x) and Bosom(x, vail) -> not Bosom(vail, cristie))\nforall x (Bosom(x, vania) -> Dejected(x))\nEmbed(vail, cristie) -> Bosom(vail, vania)\nnot Embed(vania, cristie) -> not Corneal(vania)\nEmbed(cristie, vania) -> not Embed(cristie, vail)\nforall x (Grumous(x) and Embed(x, vania) -> Bosom(vania, vail))\nforall x (Dejected(x) -> Embed(x, vania))\nforall x (Dejected(x) -> Bosom(x, vania))\n\nnot Embed(vail, vania)\n\nEmbed(vail, cristie) and Embed(vail, cristie) -> Bosom(vail, vania) -> therefore Bosom(vail, vania) Bosom(vail, vania) and forall x (Bosom(x, vania) -> Dejected(x)) -> therefore Dejected(vail) Dejected(vail) and forall x (Dejected(x) -> Embed(x, vania)) -> therefore Embed(vail, vania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The farrand hock the timi. The freddi is not gloveless. The timi level the farrand. If someone is ionian and they need the timi then the timi does not need the farrand. If someone educate the freddi then they are haywire. If the timi level the farrand then the timi educate the freddi. If the freddi does not like the farrand then the freddi is not ionian. If the farrand level the freddi then the farrand does not like the timi. If someone is discordant and they like the freddi then the freddi educate the timi. If someone is haywire then they like the freddi. If someone is haywire then they need the freddi. The freddi is not haywire.", "logic": "\nHock(farrand, timi)\nnot Gloveless(freddi)\nLevel(timi, farrand)\nforall x (Ionian(x) and Educate(x, timi) -> not Educate(timi, farrand))\nforall x (Educate(x, freddi) -> Haywire(x))\nLevel(timi, farrand) -> Educate(timi, freddi)\nnot Level(freddi, farrand) -> not Ionian(freddi)\nLevel(farrand, freddi) -> not Level(farrand, timi)\nforall x (Discordant(x) and Level(x, freddi) -> Educate(freddi, timi))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Level(x, freddi))\nforall x (Haywire(x) -> Educate(x, freddi))\n\nnot Haywire(freddi)\n\nforall x (Educate(x, freddi) -> Haywire(x)) <- forall x (Haywire(x) -> Educate(x, freddi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The margi curse the king. The cosetta is not nativistic. The king advect the margi. If someone is botryoid and they need the king then the king does not need the margi. If someone clap the cosetta then they are flagitious. If the king advect the margi then the king clap the cosetta. If the cosetta does not like the margi then the cosetta is not botryoid. If the margi advect the cosetta then the margi does not like the king. If someone is brainless and they like the cosetta then the cosetta clap the king. If someone is flagitious then they like the cosetta. If someone is flagitious then they need the cosetta. The margi clap the cosetta.", "logic": "\nCurse(margi, king)\nnot Nativistic(cosetta)\nAdvect(king, margi)\nforall x (Botryoid(x) and Clap(x, king) -> not Clap(king, margi))\nforall x (Clap(x, cosetta) -> Flagitious(x))\nAdvect(king, margi) -> Clap(king, cosetta)\nnot Advect(cosetta, margi) -> not Botryoid(cosetta)\nAdvect(margi, cosetta) -> not Advect(margi, king)\nforall x (Brainless(x) and Advect(x, cosetta) -> Clap(cosetta, king))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) -> Advect(x, cosetta))\nforall x (Flagitious(x) -> Clap(x, cosetta))\n\nClap(margi, cosetta)\n\nforall x (Flagitious(x) -> Clap(x, cosetta)) <- forall x (Clap(x, cosetta) -> Flagitious(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The elayne immix the sanford. The janella is not conelike. The sanford distend the elayne. If someone is listless and they need the sanford then the sanford does not need the elayne. If someone dispense the janella then they are tragic. If the sanford distend the elayne then the sanford dispense the janella. If the janella does not like the elayne then the janella is not listless. If the elayne distend the janella then the elayne does not like the sanford. If someone is mirthless and they like the janella then the janella dispense the sanford. If someone is tragic then they like the janella. If someone is tragic then they need the janella. The janella does not need the janella.", "logic": "\nImmix(elayne, sanford)\nnot Conelike(janella)\nDistend(sanford, elayne)\nforall x (Listless(x) and Dispense(x, sanford) -> not Dispense(sanford, elayne))\nforall x (Dispense(x, janella) -> Tragic(x))\nDistend(sanford, elayne) -> Dispense(sanford, janella)\nnot Distend(janella, elayne) -> not Listless(janella)\nDistend(elayne, janella) -> not Distend(elayne, sanford)\nforall x (Mirthless(x) and Distend(x, janella) -> Dispense(janella, sanford))\nforall x (Tragic(x) -> Distend(x, janella))\nforall x (Tragic(x) -> Dispense(x, janella))\n\nnot Dispense(janella, janella)\n\nforall x (Tragic(x) -> Dispense(x, janella)) <- forall x (Dispense(x, janella) -> Tragic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The sileas toss the sholom. The cybelle is not beltless. The sholom question the sileas. If someone is dilute and they need the sholom then the sholom does not need the sileas. If someone barricade the cybelle then they are calycled. If the sholom question the sileas then the sholom barricade the cybelle. If the cybelle does not like the sileas then the cybelle is not dilute. If the sileas question the cybelle then the sileas does not like the sholom. If someone is offstage and they like the cybelle then the cybelle barricade the sholom. If someone is calycled then they like the cybelle. If someone is calycled then they need the cybelle. The cybelle question the cybelle.", "logic": "\nToss(sileas, sholom)\nnot Beltless(cybelle)\nQuestion(sholom, sileas)\nforall x (Dilute(x) and Barricade(x, sholom) -> not Barricade(sholom, sileas))\nforall x (Barricade(x, cybelle) -> Calycled(x))\nQuestion(sholom, sileas) -> Barricade(sholom, cybelle)\nnot Question(cybelle, sileas) -> not Dilute(cybelle)\nQuestion(sileas, cybelle) -> not Question(sileas, sholom)\nforall x (Offstage(x) and Question(x, cybelle) -> Barricade(cybelle, sholom))\nforall x (Calycled(x) -> Question(x, cybelle))\nforall x (Calycled(x) -> Barricade(x, cybelle))\n\nQuestion(cybelle, cybelle)\n\nforall x (Calycled(x) -> Question(x, cybelle)) <- forall x (Barricade(x, cybelle) -> Calycled(x)) <- forall x (Calycled(x) -> Barricade(x, cybelle)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The welbie footslog the rem. The helmuth is not divisional. The rem smooth the welbie. If someone is stretched and they need the rem then the rem does not need the welbie. If someone islamize the helmuth then they are overjoyed. If the rem smooth the welbie then the rem islamize the helmuth. If the helmuth does not like the welbie then the helmuth is not stretched. If the welbie smooth the helmuth then the welbie does not like the rem. If someone is subatomic and they like the helmuth then the helmuth islamize the rem. If someone is overjoyed then they like the helmuth. If someone is overjoyed then they need the helmuth. The rem does not see the rem.", "logic": "\nFootslog(welbie, rem)\nnot Divisional(helmuth)\nSmooth(rem, welbie)\nforall x (Stretched(x) and Islamize(x, rem) -> not Islamize(rem, welbie))\nforall x (Islamize(x, helmuth) -> Overjoyed(x))\nSmooth(rem, welbie) -> Islamize(rem, helmuth)\nnot Smooth(helmuth, welbie) -> not Stretched(helmuth)\nSmooth(welbie, helmuth) -> not Smooth(welbie, rem)\nforall x (Subatomic(x) and Smooth(x, helmuth) -> Islamize(helmuth, rem))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) -> Smooth(x, helmuth))\nforall x (Overjoyed(x) -> Islamize(x, helmuth))\n\nnot Footslog(rem, rem)\n\nnot Footslog(rem, rem) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The krista evanesce the jillane. The amabel is not sisterlike. The jillane monitor the krista. If someone is gargantuan and they need the jillane then the jillane does not need the krista. If someone wing the amabel then they are excitative. If the jillane monitor the krista then the jillane wing the amabel. If the amabel does not like the krista then the amabel is not gargantuan. If the krista monitor the amabel then the krista does not like the jillane. If someone is diabolical and they like the amabel then the amabel wing the jillane. If someone is excitative then they like the amabel. If someone is excitative then they need the amabel. The amabel evanesce the krista.", "logic": "\nEvanesce(krista, jillane)\nnot Sisterlike(amabel)\nMonitor(jillane, krista)\nforall x (Gargantuan(x) and Wing(x, jillane) -> not Wing(jillane, krista))\nforall x (Wing(x, amabel) -> Excitative(x))\nMonitor(jillane, krista) -> Wing(jillane, amabel)\nnot Monitor(amabel, krista) -> not Gargantuan(amabel)\nMonitor(krista, amabel) -> not Monitor(krista, jillane)\nforall x (Diabolical(x) and Monitor(x, amabel) -> Wing(amabel, jillane))\nforall x (Excitative(x) -> Monitor(x, amabel))\nforall x (Excitative(x) -> Wing(x, amabel))\n\nEvanesce(amabel, krista)\n\nEvanesce(amabel, krista) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The carolynn engorge the halette. The kelila is not exotic. The halette endow the carolynn. If someone is synoptic and they need the halette then the halette does not need the carolynn. If someone site the kelila then they are comburent. If the halette endow the carolynn then the halette site the kelila. If the kelila does not like the carolynn then the kelila is not synoptic. If the carolynn endow the kelila then the carolynn does not like the halette. If someone is colourful and they like the kelila then the kelila site the halette. If someone is comburent then they like the kelila. If someone is comburent then they need the kelila. The carolynn does not need the halette.", "logic": "\nEngorge(carolynn, halette)\nnot Exotic(kelila)\nEndow(halette, carolynn)\nforall x (Synoptic(x) and Site(x, halette) -> not Site(halette, carolynn))\nforall x (Site(x, kelila) -> Comburent(x))\nEndow(halette, carolynn) -> Site(halette, kelila)\nnot Endow(kelila, carolynn) -> not Synoptic(kelila)\nEndow(carolynn, kelila) -> not Endow(carolynn, halette)\nforall x (Colourful(x) and Endow(x, kelila) -> Site(kelila, halette))\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> Endow(x, kelila))\nforall x (Comburent(x) -> Site(x, kelila))\n\nnot Site(carolynn, halette)\n\nnot Site(carolynn, halette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The noelyn jerk the ralf. The jilleen is not abeyant. The ralf admonish the noelyn. If someone is uniformed and they need the ralf then the ralf does not need the noelyn. If someone mother the jilleen then they are unburied. If the ralf admonish the noelyn then the ralf mother the jilleen. If the jilleen does not like the noelyn then the jilleen is not uniformed. If the noelyn admonish the jilleen then the noelyn does not like the ralf. If someone is woebegone and they like the jilleen then the jilleen mother the ralf. If someone is unburied then they like the jilleen. If someone is unburied then they need the jilleen. The noelyn admonish the noelyn.", "logic": "\nJerk(noelyn, ralf)\nnot Abeyant(jilleen)\nAdmonish(ralf, noelyn)\nforall x (Uniformed(x) and Mother(x, ralf) -> not Mother(ralf, noelyn))\nforall x (Mother(x, jilleen) -> Unburied(x))\nAdmonish(ralf, noelyn) -> Mother(ralf, jilleen)\nnot Admonish(jilleen, noelyn) -> not Uniformed(jilleen)\nAdmonish(noelyn, jilleen) -> not Admonish(noelyn, ralf)\nforall x (Woebegone(x) and Admonish(x, jilleen) -> Mother(jilleen, ralf))\nforall x (Unburied(x) -> Admonish(x, jilleen))\nforall x (Unburied(x) -> Mother(x, jilleen))\n\nAdmonish(noelyn, noelyn)\n\nAdmonish(noelyn, noelyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-908"} {"premises": "The florri shower the somerset. The florri is pessimal. The florri is linguistic. The florri hydrolyze the emeline. The florri kneecap the emeline. The somerset shower the emeline. The somerset kneecap the emeline. The emeline shower the florri. The emeline shower the somerset. The emeline is tactual. The emeline is pessimal. The emeline is prostatic. The emeline is linguistic. The emeline hydrolyze the somerset. The emeline kneecap the florri. The emeline kneecap the somerset. If something shower the florri and it kneecap the emeline then the florri is tactual. If something shower the florri and the florri kneecap the emeline then the florri is linguistic. If something shower the somerset then the somerset is prostatic. If the somerset shower the florri and the somerset shower the emeline then the emeline is linguistic. Nice things are linguistic. If the somerset kneecap the emeline and the somerset is escaped then the emeline kneecap the somerset. If something shower the emeline and it is linguistic then the emeline kneecap the somerset. If something shower the somerset and it hydrolyze the florri then it shower the emeline. The florri hydrolyze the emeline.", "logic": "\nShower(florri, somerset)\nPessimal(florri)\nLinguistic(florri)\nHydrolyze(florri, emeline)\nKneecap(florri, emeline)\nShower(somerset, emeline)\nKneecap(somerset, emeline)\nShower(emeline, florri)\nShower(emeline, somerset)\nTactual(emeline)\nPessimal(emeline)\nProstatic(emeline)\nLinguistic(emeline)\nHydrolyze(emeline, somerset)\nKneecap(emeline, florri)\nKneecap(emeline, somerset)\nforall x (Shower(x, florri) and Kneecap(x, emeline) -> Tactual(florri))\nforall x (Shower(x, florri) and Kneecap(florri, emeline) -> Linguistic(florri))\nforall x (Shower(x, somerset) -> Prostatic(somerset))\nShower(somerset, florri) and Shower(somerset, emeline) -> Linguistic(emeline)\nforall x (Pessimal(x) -> Linguistic(x))\nKneecap(somerset, emeline) and Escaped(somerset) -> Kneecap(emeline, somerset)\nforall x (Shower(x, emeline) and Linguistic(x) -> Kneecap(emeline, somerset))\nforall x (Shower(x, somerset) and Hydrolyze(x, florri) -> Shower(x, emeline))\n\nHydrolyze(florri, emeline)\n\ntherefore Hydrolyze(florri, emeline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3223"} {"premises": "The terrianne cartoon the neall. The terrianne is moldovan. The terrianne is forbearing. The terrianne percolate the brandie. The terrianne threaten the brandie. The neall cartoon the brandie. The neall threaten the brandie. The brandie cartoon the terrianne. The brandie cartoon the neall. The brandie is nonrandom. The brandie is moldovan. The brandie is opposed. The brandie is forbearing. The brandie percolate the neall. The brandie threaten the terrianne. The brandie threaten the neall. If something cartoon the terrianne and it threaten the brandie then the terrianne is nonrandom. If something cartoon the terrianne and the terrianne threaten the brandie then the terrianne is forbearing. If something cartoon the neall then the neall is opposed. If the neall cartoon the terrianne and the neall cartoon the brandie then the brandie is forbearing. Nice things are forbearing. If the neall threaten the brandie and the neall is rhomboidal then the brandie threaten the neall. If something cartoon the brandie and it is forbearing then the brandie threaten the neall. If something cartoon the neall and it percolate the terrianne then it cartoon the brandie. The brandie does not need the terrianne.", "logic": "\nCartoon(terrianne, neall)\nMoldovan(terrianne)\nForbearing(terrianne)\nPercolate(terrianne, brandie)\nThreaten(terrianne, brandie)\nCartoon(neall, brandie)\nThreaten(neall, brandie)\nCartoon(brandie, terrianne)\nCartoon(brandie, neall)\nNonrandom(brandie)\nMoldovan(brandie)\nOpposed(brandie)\nForbearing(brandie)\nPercolate(brandie, neall)\nThreaten(brandie, terrianne)\nThreaten(brandie, neall)\nforall x (Cartoon(x, terrianne) and Threaten(x, brandie) -> Nonrandom(terrianne))\nforall x (Cartoon(x, terrianne) and Threaten(terrianne, brandie) -> Forbearing(terrianne))\nforall x (Cartoon(x, neall) -> Opposed(neall))\nCartoon(neall, terrianne) and Cartoon(neall, brandie) -> Forbearing(brandie)\nforall x (Moldovan(x) -> Forbearing(x))\nThreaten(neall, brandie) and Rhomboidal(neall) -> Threaten(brandie, neall)\nforall x (Cartoon(x, brandie) and Forbearing(x) -> Threaten(brandie, neall))\nforall x (Cartoon(x, neall) and Percolate(x, terrianne) -> Cartoon(x, brandie))\n\nnot Threaten(brandie, terrianne)\n\ntherefore Threaten(brandie, terrianne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3223"} {"premises": "The tania overwork the lilith. The tania is spongelike. The tania is glittering. The tania latinize the basia. The tania respond the basia. The lilith overwork the basia. The lilith respond the basia. The basia overwork the tania. The basia overwork the lilith. The basia is fortuitous. The basia is spongelike. The basia is essential. The basia is glittering. The basia latinize the lilith. The basia respond the tania. The basia respond the lilith. If something overwork the tania and it respond the basia then the tania is fortuitous. If something overwork the tania and the tania respond the basia then the tania is glittering. If something overwork the lilith then the lilith is essential. If the lilith overwork the tania and the lilith overwork the basia then the basia is glittering. Nice things are glittering. If the lilith respond the basia and the lilith is rewardful then the basia respond the lilith. If something overwork the basia and it is glittering then the basia respond the lilith. If something overwork the lilith and it latinize the tania then it overwork the basia. The tania is not fortuitous.", "logic": "\nOverwork(tania, lilith)\nSpongelike(tania)\nGlittering(tania)\nLatinize(tania, basia)\nRespond(tania, basia)\nOverwork(lilith, basia)\nRespond(lilith, basia)\nOverwork(basia, tania)\nOverwork(basia, lilith)\nFortuitous(basia)\nSpongelike(basia)\nEssential(basia)\nGlittering(basia)\nLatinize(basia, lilith)\nRespond(basia, tania)\nRespond(basia, lilith)\nforall x (Overwork(x, tania) and Respond(x, basia) -> Fortuitous(tania))\nforall x (Overwork(x, tania) and Respond(tania, basia) -> Glittering(tania))\nforall x (Overwork(x, lilith) -> Essential(lilith))\nOverwork(lilith, tania) and Overwork(lilith, basia) -> Glittering(basia)\nforall x (Spongelike(x) -> Glittering(x))\nRespond(lilith, basia) and Rewardful(lilith) -> Respond(basia, lilith)\nforall x (Overwork(x, basia) and Glittering(x) -> Respond(basia, lilith))\nforall x (Overwork(x, lilith) and Latinize(x, tania) -> Overwork(x, basia))\n\nnot Fortuitous(tania)\n\nforall x (Overwork(x, tania) and Respond(x, basia) -> Fortuitous(tania)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3223"} {"premises": "The brina solicit the ahmed. The brina is serried. The brina is exacting. The brina improvize the gussi. The brina prance the gussi. The ahmed solicit the gussi. The ahmed prance the gussi. The gussi solicit the brina. The gussi solicit the ahmed. The gussi is girlish. The gussi is serried. The gussi is outsize. The gussi is exacting. The gussi improvize the ahmed. The gussi prance the brina. The gussi prance the ahmed. If something solicit the brina and it prance the gussi then the brina is girlish. If something solicit the brina and the brina prance the gussi then the brina is exacting. If something solicit the ahmed then the ahmed is outsize. If the ahmed solicit the brina and the ahmed solicit the gussi then the gussi is exacting. Nice things are exacting. If the ahmed prance the gussi and the ahmed is documental then the gussi prance the ahmed. If something solicit the gussi and it is exacting then the gussi prance the ahmed. If something solicit the ahmed and it improvize the brina then it solicit the gussi. The gussi is documental.", "logic": "\nSolicit(brina, ahmed)\nSerried(brina)\nExacting(brina)\nImprovize(brina, gussi)\nPrance(brina, gussi)\nSolicit(ahmed, gussi)\nPrance(ahmed, gussi)\nSolicit(gussi, brina)\nSolicit(gussi, ahmed)\nGirlish(gussi)\nSerried(gussi)\nOutsize(gussi)\nExacting(gussi)\nImprovize(gussi, ahmed)\nPrance(gussi, brina)\nPrance(gussi, ahmed)\nforall x (Solicit(x, brina) and Prance(x, gussi) -> Girlish(brina))\nforall x (Solicit(x, brina) and Prance(brina, gussi) -> Exacting(brina))\nforall x (Solicit(x, ahmed) -> Outsize(ahmed))\nSolicit(ahmed, brina) and Solicit(ahmed, gussi) -> Exacting(gussi)\nforall x (Serried(x) -> Exacting(x))\nPrance(ahmed, gussi) and Documental(ahmed) -> Prance(gussi, ahmed)\nforall x (Solicit(x, gussi) and Exacting(x) -> Prance(gussi, ahmed))\nforall x (Solicit(x, ahmed) and Improvize(x, brina) -> Solicit(x, gussi))\n\nDocumental(gussi)\n\nDocumental(gussi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3223"} {"premises": "Northrup is paranormal. Bernadene is provoked. Orlando is built. All oldline, paranormal people are washed. If Orlando is paranormal then Orlando is not ungoverned. If Bernadene is provoked and Bernadene is cagey then Bernadene is built. If someone is paranormal and ungoverned then they are not oldline. All built people are paranormal. If Orlando is not ungoverned then Orlando is provoked. Bernadene is provoked.", "logic": "\nParanormal(northrup)\nProvoked(bernadene)\nBuilt(orlando)\nforall x (Oldline(x) and Paranormal(x) -> Washed(x))\nParanormal(orlando) -> not Ungoverned(orlando)\nProvoked(bernadene) and Cagey(bernadene) -> Built(bernadene)\nforall x (Paranormal(x) and Ungoverned(x) -> not Oldline(x))\nforall x (Built(x) -> Paranormal(x))\nnot Ungoverned(orlando) -> Provoked(orlando)\n\nProvoked(bernadene)\n\ntherefore Provoked(bernadene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Alaine is idolised. Walsh is uxorious. Christyna is ampullary. All opposite, idolised people are articular. If Christyna is idolised then Christyna is not coloured. If Walsh is uxorious and Walsh is estranging then Walsh is ampullary. If someone is idolised and coloured then they are not opposite. All ampullary people are idolised. If Christyna is not coloured then Christyna is uxorious. Alaine is not idolised.", "logic": "\nIdolised(alaine)\nUxorious(walsh)\nAmpullary(christyna)\nforall x (Opposite(x) and Idolised(x) -> Articular(x))\nIdolised(christyna) -> not Coloured(christyna)\nUxorious(walsh) and Estranging(walsh) -> Ampullary(walsh)\nforall x (Idolised(x) and Coloured(x) -> not Opposite(x))\nforall x (Ampullary(x) -> Idolised(x))\nnot Coloured(christyna) -> Uxorious(christyna)\n\nnot Idolised(alaine)\n\ntherefore Idolised(alaine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Piotr is unactable. Anya is found. Briggs is antisocial. All finespun, unactable people are realistic. If Briggs is unactable then Briggs is not rutted. If Anya is found and Anya is asserting then Anya is antisocial. If someone is unactable and rutted then they are not finespun. All antisocial people are unactable. If Briggs is not rutted then Briggs is found. Briggs is unactable.", "logic": "\nUnactable(piotr)\nFound(anya)\nAntisocial(briggs)\nforall x (Finespun(x) and Unactable(x) -> Realistic(x))\nUnactable(briggs) -> not Rutted(briggs)\nFound(anya) and Asserting(anya) -> Antisocial(anya)\nforall x (Unactable(x) and Rutted(x) -> not Finespun(x))\nforall x (Antisocial(x) -> Unactable(x))\nnot Rutted(briggs) -> Found(briggs)\n\nUnactable(briggs)\n\nAntisocial(briggs) and forall x (Antisocial(x) -> Unactable(x)) -> therefore Unactable(briggs)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Hubert is leprose. Loren is varnished. Johny is winning. All unemployed, leprose people are unshelled. If Johny is leprose then Johny is not festal. If Loren is varnished and Loren is shrill then Loren is winning. If someone is leprose and festal then they are not unemployed. All winning people are leprose. If Johny is not festal then Johny is varnished. Johny is not leprose.", "logic": "\nLeprose(hubert)\nVarnished(loren)\nWinning(johny)\nforall x (Unemployed(x) and Leprose(x) -> Unshelled(x))\nLeprose(johny) -> not Festal(johny)\nVarnished(loren) and Shrill(loren) -> Winning(loren)\nforall x (Leprose(x) and Festal(x) -> not Unemployed(x))\nforall x (Winning(x) -> Leprose(x))\nnot Festal(johny) -> Varnished(johny)\n\nnot Leprose(johny)\n\nWinning(johny) and forall x (Winning(x) -> Leprose(x)) -> therefore Leprose(johny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Jeanne is primed. Sherlocke is acrogenic. Emmaline is cupric. All clever, primed people are sloughy. If Emmaline is primed then Emmaline is not toxicant. If Sherlocke is acrogenic and Sherlocke is xanthous then Sherlocke is cupric. If someone is primed and toxicant then they are not clever. All cupric people are primed. If Emmaline is not toxicant then Emmaline is acrogenic. Emmaline is not toxicant.", "logic": "\nPrimed(jeanne)\nAcrogenic(sherlocke)\nCupric(emmaline)\nforall x (Clever(x) and Primed(x) -> Sloughy(x))\nPrimed(emmaline) -> not Toxicant(emmaline)\nAcrogenic(sherlocke) and Xanthous(sherlocke) -> Cupric(sherlocke)\nforall x (Primed(x) and Toxicant(x) -> not Clever(x))\nforall x (Cupric(x) -> Primed(x))\nnot Toxicant(emmaline) -> Acrogenic(emmaline)\n\nnot Toxicant(emmaline)\n\nCupric(emmaline) and forall x (Cupric(x) -> Primed(x)) -> therefore Primed(emmaline) Primed(emmaline) and Primed(emmaline) -> not Toxicant(emmaline) -> therefore not Toxicant(emmaline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Jude is speckless. Drea is nonechoic. Matt is voluble. All booked, speckless people are unanimous. If Matt is speckless then Matt is not conceited. If Drea is nonechoic and Drea is dreaded then Drea is voluble. If someone is speckless and conceited then they are not booked. All voluble people are speckless. If Matt is not conceited then Matt is nonechoic. Matt is conceited.", "logic": "\nSpeckless(jude)\nNonechoic(drea)\nVoluble(matt)\nforall x (Booked(x) and Speckless(x) -> Unanimous(x))\nSpeckless(matt) -> not Conceited(matt)\nNonechoic(drea) and Dreaded(drea) -> Voluble(drea)\nforall x (Speckless(x) and Conceited(x) -> not Booked(x))\nforall x (Voluble(x) -> Speckless(x))\nnot Conceited(matt) -> Nonechoic(matt)\n\nConceited(matt)\n\nVoluble(matt) and forall x (Voluble(x) -> Speckless(x)) -> therefore Speckless(matt) Speckless(matt) and Speckless(matt) -> not Conceited(matt) -> therefore not Conceited(matt)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Westley is deflective. Thomasin is burnished. Moses is avertible. All centrist, deflective people are irrational. If Moses is deflective then Moses is not recoilless. If Thomasin is burnished and Thomasin is variegated then Thomasin is avertible. If someone is deflective and recoilless then they are not centrist. All avertible people are deflective. If Moses is not recoilless then Moses is burnished. Moses is burnished.", "logic": "\nDeflective(westley)\nBurnished(thomasin)\nAvertible(moses)\nforall x (Centrist(x) and Deflective(x) -> Irrational(x))\nDeflective(moses) -> not Recoilless(moses)\nBurnished(thomasin) and Variegated(thomasin) -> Avertible(thomasin)\nforall x (Deflective(x) and Recoilless(x) -> not Centrist(x))\nforall x (Avertible(x) -> Deflective(x))\nnot Recoilless(moses) -> Burnished(moses)\n\nBurnished(moses)\n\nAvertible(moses) and forall x (Avertible(x) -> Deflective(x)) -> therefore Deflective(moses) Deflective(moses) and Deflective(moses) -> not Recoilless(moses) -> therefore not Recoilless(moses) not Recoilless(moses) and not Recoilless(moses) -> Burnished(moses) -> therefore Burnished(moses)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Enrika is czaristic. Roderigo is metabolous. Chelsy is untoward. All combatant, czaristic people are clarion. If Chelsy is czaristic then Chelsy is not meandering. If Roderigo is metabolous and Roderigo is unsuitable then Roderigo is untoward. If someone is czaristic and meandering then they are not combatant. All untoward people are czaristic. If Chelsy is not meandering then Chelsy is metabolous. Chelsy is not metabolous.", "logic": "\nCzaristic(enrika)\nMetabolous(roderigo)\nUntoward(chelsy)\nforall x (Combatant(x) and Czaristic(x) -> Clarion(x))\nCzaristic(chelsy) -> not Meandering(chelsy)\nMetabolous(roderigo) and Unsuitable(roderigo) -> Untoward(roderigo)\nforall x (Czaristic(x) and Meandering(x) -> not Combatant(x))\nforall x (Untoward(x) -> Czaristic(x))\nnot Meandering(chelsy) -> Metabolous(chelsy)\n\nnot Metabolous(chelsy)\n\nUntoward(chelsy) and forall x (Untoward(x) -> Czaristic(x)) -> therefore Czaristic(chelsy) Czaristic(chelsy) and Czaristic(chelsy) -> not Meandering(chelsy) -> therefore not Meandering(chelsy) not Meandering(chelsy) and not Meandering(chelsy) -> Metabolous(chelsy) -> therefore Metabolous(chelsy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Rubie is cognisant. Silva is nestorian. Brenn is vacuous. All carmine, cognisant people are livable. If Brenn is cognisant then Brenn is not bucolic. If Silva is nestorian and Silva is algoid then Silva is vacuous. If someone is cognisant and bucolic then they are not carmine. All vacuous people are cognisant. If Brenn is not bucolic then Brenn is nestorian. Rubie is not livable.", "logic": "\nCognisant(rubie)\nNestorian(silva)\nVacuous(brenn)\nforall x (Carmine(x) and Cognisant(x) -> Livable(x))\nCognisant(brenn) -> not Bucolic(brenn)\nNestorian(silva) and Algoid(silva) -> Vacuous(silva)\nforall x (Cognisant(x) and Bucolic(x) -> not Carmine(x))\nforall x (Vacuous(x) -> Cognisant(x))\nnot Bucolic(brenn) -> Nestorian(brenn)\n\nnot Livable(rubie)\n\nforall x (Carmine(x) and Cognisant(x) -> Livable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Bernice is ravening. Norman is sisyphean. Moyna is soignee. All fashioned, ravening people are quickset. If Moyna is ravening then Moyna is not gradual. If Norman is sisyphean and Norman is peninsular then Norman is soignee. If someone is ravening and gradual then they are not fashioned. All soignee people are ravening. If Moyna is not gradual then Moyna is sisyphean. Norman is quickset.", "logic": "\nRavening(bernice)\nSisyphean(norman)\nSoignee(moyna)\nforall x (Fashioned(x) and Ravening(x) -> Quickset(x))\nRavening(moyna) -> not Gradual(moyna)\nSisyphean(norman) and Peninsular(norman) -> Soignee(norman)\nforall x (Ravening(x) and Gradual(x) -> not Fashioned(x))\nforall x (Soignee(x) -> Ravening(x))\nnot Gradual(moyna) -> Sisyphean(moyna)\n\nQuickset(norman)\n\nforall x (Fashioned(x) and Ravening(x) -> Quickset(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Ajai is unconsumed. Edita is orange. Mirabella is canonized. All brimfull, unconsumed people are tenebrous. If Mirabella is unconsumed then Mirabella is not convoluted. If Edita is orange and Edita is alright then Edita is canonized. If someone is unconsumed and convoluted then they are not brimfull. All canonized people are unconsumed. If Mirabella is not convoluted then Mirabella is orange. Mirabella is not tenebrous.", "logic": "\nUnconsumed(ajai)\nOrange(edita)\nCanonized(mirabella)\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Unconsumed(x) -> Tenebrous(x))\nUnconsumed(mirabella) -> not Convoluted(mirabella)\nOrange(edita) and Alright(edita) -> Canonized(edita)\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) and Convoluted(x) -> not Brimfull(x))\nforall x (Canonized(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nnot Convoluted(mirabella) -> Orange(mirabella)\n\nnot Tenebrous(mirabella)\n\nforall x (Brimfull(x) and Unconsumed(x) -> Tenebrous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Briggs is forked. Cristabel is accurate. Lenna is crosstown. All unfamiliar, forked people are plumate. If Lenna is forked then Lenna is not saturnine. If Cristabel is accurate and Cristabel is drippy then Cristabel is crosstown. If someone is forked and saturnine then they are not unfamiliar. All crosstown people are forked. If Lenna is not saturnine then Lenna is accurate. Cristabel is crosstown.", "logic": "\nForked(briggs)\nAccurate(cristabel)\nCrosstown(lenna)\nforall x (Unfamiliar(x) and Forked(x) -> Plumate(x))\nForked(lenna) -> not Saturnine(lenna)\nAccurate(cristabel) and Drippy(cristabel) -> Crosstown(cristabel)\nforall x (Forked(x) and Saturnine(x) -> not Unfamiliar(x))\nforall x (Crosstown(x) -> Forked(x))\nnot Saturnine(lenna) -> Accurate(lenna)\n\nCrosstown(cristabel)\n\nAccurate(cristabel) and Drippy(cristabel) -> Crosstown(cristabel) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Lanette is abbatial. Kelcey is uneager. Bridgette is blond. All upper, abbatial people are blooded. If Bridgette is abbatial then Bridgette is not humic. If Kelcey is uneager and Kelcey is nigerien then Kelcey is blond. If someone is abbatial and humic then they are not upper. All blond people are abbatial. If Bridgette is not humic then Bridgette is uneager. Lanette is not nigerien.", "logic": "\nAbbatial(lanette)\nUneager(kelcey)\nBlond(bridgette)\nforall x (Upper(x) and Abbatial(x) -> Blooded(x))\nAbbatial(bridgette) -> not Humic(bridgette)\nUneager(kelcey) and Nigerien(kelcey) -> Blond(kelcey)\nforall x (Abbatial(x) and Humic(x) -> not Upper(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) -> Abbatial(x))\nnot Humic(bridgette) -> Uneager(bridgette)\n\nnot Nigerien(lanette)\n\nnot Nigerien(lanette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Mamie is fortunate. Julita is nauseating. Robin is catalan. All miserly, fortunate people are subocular. If Robin is fortunate then Robin is not revised. If Julita is nauseating and Julita is astringent then Julita is catalan. If someone is fortunate and revised then they are not miserly. All catalan people are fortunate. If Robin is not revised then Robin is nauseating. Mamie is catalan.", "logic": "\nFortunate(mamie)\nNauseating(julita)\nCatalan(robin)\nforall x (Miserly(x) and Fortunate(x) -> Subocular(x))\nFortunate(robin) -> not Revised(robin)\nNauseating(julita) and Astringent(julita) -> Catalan(julita)\nforall x (Fortunate(x) and Revised(x) -> not Miserly(x))\nforall x (Catalan(x) -> Fortunate(x))\nnot Revised(robin) -> Nauseating(robin)\n\nCatalan(mamie)\n\nCatalan(mamie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Leila is unimproved. Elladine is ferric. Kimberli is hind. All sugared, unimproved people are pancreatic. If Kimberli is unimproved then Kimberli is not evil. If Elladine is ferric and Elladine is civic then Elladine is hind. If someone is unimproved and evil then they are not sugared. All hind people are unimproved. If Kimberli is not evil then Kimberli is ferric. Kimberli is not sugared.", "logic": "\nUnimproved(leila)\nFerric(elladine)\nHind(kimberli)\nforall x (Sugared(x) and Unimproved(x) -> Pancreatic(x))\nUnimproved(kimberli) -> not Evil(kimberli)\nFerric(elladine) and Civic(elladine) -> Hind(elladine)\nforall x (Unimproved(x) and Evil(x) -> not Sugared(x))\nforall x (Hind(x) -> Unimproved(x))\nnot Evil(kimberli) -> Ferric(kimberli)\n\nnot Sugared(kimberli)\n\nnot Sugared(kimberli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "Pamella is drilled. Walt is unshod. Alisa is trimotored. All cooked, drilled people are semiotic. If Alisa is drilled then Alisa is not reflexive. If Walt is unshod and Walt is carpellate then Walt is trimotored. If someone is drilled and reflexive then they are not cooked. All trimotored people are drilled. If Alisa is not reflexive then Alisa is unshod. Pamella is cooked.", "logic": "\nDrilled(pamella)\nUnshod(walt)\nTrimotored(alisa)\nforall x (Cooked(x) and Drilled(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nDrilled(alisa) -> not Reflexive(alisa)\nUnshod(walt) and Carpellate(walt) -> Trimotored(walt)\nforall x (Drilled(x) and Reflexive(x) -> not Cooked(x))\nforall x (Trimotored(x) -> Drilled(x))\nnot Reflexive(alisa) -> Unshod(alisa)\n\nCooked(pamella)\n\nCooked(pamella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1366"} {"premises": "The devora forswear the mariellen. The devora stylise the mariellen. The mariellen forswear the devora. If the mariellen stylise the devora then the devora understate the mariellen. If something is jarring then it stylise the devora. If something stylise the mariellen then the mariellen stylise the devora. The devora forswear the mariellen.", "logic": "\nForswear(devora, mariellen)\nStylise(devora, mariellen)\nForswear(mariellen, devora)\nStylise(mariellen, devora) -> Understate(devora, mariellen)\nforall x (Jarring(x) -> Stylise(x, devora))\nforall x (Stylise(x, mariellen) -> Stylise(mariellen, devora))\n\nForswear(devora, mariellen)\n\ntherefore Forswear(devora, mariellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The linette remunerate the emlynn. The linette macadamize the emlynn. The emlynn remunerate the linette. If the emlynn macadamize the linette then the linette live the emlynn. If something is scarlet then it macadamize the linette. If something macadamize the emlynn then the emlynn macadamize the linette. The linette does not need the emlynn.", "logic": "\nRemunerate(linette, emlynn)\nMacadamize(linette, emlynn)\nRemunerate(emlynn, linette)\nMacadamize(emlynn, linette) -> Live(linette, emlynn)\nforall x (Scarlet(x) -> Macadamize(x, linette))\nforall x (Macadamize(x, emlynn) -> Macadamize(emlynn, linette))\n\nnot Macadamize(linette, emlynn)\n\ntherefore Macadamize(linette, emlynn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The maureen motorboat the burt. The maureen ding the burt. The burt motorboat the maureen. If the burt ding the maureen then the maureen detox the burt. If something is ciliary then it ding the maureen. If something ding the burt then the burt ding the maureen. The burt ding the maureen.", "logic": "\nMotorboat(maureen, burt)\nDing(maureen, burt)\nMotorboat(burt, maureen)\nDing(burt, maureen) -> Detox(maureen, burt)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) -> Ding(x, maureen))\nforall x (Ding(x, burt) -> Ding(burt, maureen))\n\nDing(burt, maureen)\n\nDing(maureen, burt) and forall x (Ding(x, burt) -> Ding(burt, maureen)) -> therefore Ding(burt, maureen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The zoe manumit the thomasin. The zoe mother the thomasin. The thomasin manumit the zoe. If the thomasin mother the zoe then the zoe wanton the thomasin. If something is peopled then it mother the zoe. If something mother the thomasin then the thomasin mother the zoe. The thomasin does not need the zoe.", "logic": "\nManumit(zoe, thomasin)\nMother(zoe, thomasin)\nManumit(thomasin, zoe)\nMother(thomasin, zoe) -> Wanton(zoe, thomasin)\nforall x (Peopled(x) -> Mother(x, zoe))\nforall x (Mother(x, thomasin) -> Mother(thomasin, zoe))\n\nnot Mother(thomasin, zoe)\n\nMother(zoe, thomasin) and forall x (Mother(x, thomasin) -> Mother(thomasin, zoe)) -> therefore Mother(thomasin, zoe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The marcellus coin the celie. The marcellus aphorise the celie. The celie coin the marcellus. If the celie aphorise the marcellus then the marcellus criticize the celie. If something is chylific then it aphorise the marcellus. If something aphorise the celie then the celie aphorise the marcellus. The marcellus criticize the celie.", "logic": "\nCoin(marcellus, celie)\nAphorise(marcellus, celie)\nCoin(celie, marcellus)\nAphorise(celie, marcellus) -> Criticize(marcellus, celie)\nforall x (Chylific(x) -> Aphorise(x, marcellus))\nforall x (Aphorise(x, celie) -> Aphorise(celie, marcellus))\n\nCriticize(marcellus, celie)\n\nAphorise(marcellus, celie) and forall x (Aphorise(x, celie) -> Aphorise(celie, marcellus)) -> therefore Aphorise(celie, marcellus) Aphorise(celie, marcellus) and Aphorise(celie, marcellus) -> Criticize(marcellus, celie) -> therefore Criticize(marcellus, celie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The augie backbite the brent. The augie curtsey the brent. The brent backbite the augie. If the brent curtsey the augie then the augie hedgehop the brent. If something is turned then it curtsey the augie. If something curtsey the brent then the brent curtsey the augie. The augie does not chase the brent.", "logic": "\nBackbite(augie, brent)\nCurtsey(augie, brent)\nBackbite(brent, augie)\nCurtsey(brent, augie) -> Hedgehop(augie, brent)\nforall x (Turned(x) -> Curtsey(x, augie))\nforall x (Curtsey(x, brent) -> Curtsey(brent, augie))\n\nnot Hedgehop(augie, brent)\n\nCurtsey(augie, brent) and forall x (Curtsey(x, brent) -> Curtsey(brent, augie)) -> therefore Curtsey(brent, augie) Curtsey(brent, augie) and Curtsey(brent, augie) -> Hedgehop(augie, brent) -> therefore Hedgehop(augie, brent)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The cyrill tuck the elmore. The cyrill deputise the elmore. The elmore tuck the cyrill. If the elmore deputise the cyrill then the cyrill apprize the elmore. If something is campy then it deputise the cyrill. If something deputise the elmore then the elmore deputise the cyrill. The cyrill does not need the cyrill.", "logic": "\nTuck(cyrill, elmore)\nDeputise(cyrill, elmore)\nTuck(elmore, cyrill)\nDeputise(elmore, cyrill) -> Apprize(cyrill, elmore)\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Deputise(x, cyrill))\nforall x (Deputise(x, elmore) -> Deputise(elmore, cyrill))\n\nnot Deputise(cyrill, cyrill)\n\nforall x (Campy(x) -> Deputise(x, cyrill)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The liorah photostat the bidget. The liorah attribute the bidget. The bidget photostat the liorah. If the bidget attribute the liorah then the liorah fair the bidget. If something is dioestrous then it attribute the liorah. If something attribute the bidget then the bidget attribute the liorah. The bidget is blue.", "logic": "\nPhotostat(liorah, bidget)\nAttribute(liorah, bidget)\nPhotostat(bidget, liorah)\nAttribute(bidget, liorah) -> Fair(liorah, bidget)\nforall x (Dioestrous(x) -> Attribute(x, liorah))\nforall x (Attribute(x, bidget) -> Attribute(bidget, liorah))\n\nBlue(bidget)\n\nBlue(bidget) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The thatch whir the harcourt. The thatch outrange the harcourt. The harcourt whir the thatch. If the harcourt outrange the thatch then the thatch intimidate the harcourt. If something is explosive then it outrange the thatch. If something outrange the harcourt then the harcourt outrange the thatch. The harcourt is not cold.", "logic": "\nWhir(thatch, harcourt)\nOutrange(thatch, harcourt)\nWhir(harcourt, thatch)\nOutrange(harcourt, thatch) -> Intimidate(thatch, harcourt)\nforall x (Explosive(x) -> Outrange(x, thatch))\nforall x (Outrange(x, harcourt) -> Outrange(harcourt, thatch))\n\nnot Cold(harcourt)\n\nnot Cold(harcourt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The thad lubricate the jaine. The thad annotate the jaine. The jaine lubricate the thad. If the jaine annotate the thad then the thad chaw the jaine. If something is puckish then it annotate the thad. If something annotate the jaine then the jaine annotate the thad. The jaine is rough.", "logic": "\nLubricate(thad, jaine)\nAnnotate(thad, jaine)\nLubricate(jaine, thad)\nAnnotate(jaine, thad) -> Chaw(thad, jaine)\nforall x (Puckish(x) -> Annotate(x, thad))\nforall x (Annotate(x, jaine) -> Annotate(jaine, thad))\n\nRough(jaine)\n\nRough(jaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The lena squash the filide. The lena housebreak the filide. The filide squash the lena. If the filide housebreak the lena then the lena nuzzle the filide. If something is beadlike then it housebreak the lena. If something housebreak the filide then the filide housebreak the lena. The lena does not chase the lena.", "logic": "\nSquash(lena, filide)\nHousebreak(lena, filide)\nSquash(filide, lena)\nHousebreak(filide, lena) -> Nuzzle(lena, filide)\nforall x (Beadlike(x) -> Housebreak(x, lena))\nforall x (Housebreak(x, filide) -> Housebreak(filide, lena))\n\nnot Nuzzle(lena, lena)\n\nnot Nuzzle(lena, lena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "The terrill glare the peyton. The terrill nuzzle the peyton. The peyton glare the terrill. If the peyton nuzzle the terrill then the terrill miniate the peyton. If something is sphingine then it nuzzle the terrill. If something nuzzle the peyton then the peyton nuzzle the terrill. The peyton nuzzle the peyton.", "logic": "\nGlare(terrill, peyton)\nNuzzle(terrill, peyton)\nGlare(peyton, terrill)\nNuzzle(peyton, terrill) -> Miniate(terrill, peyton)\nforall x (Sphingine(x) -> Nuzzle(x, terrill))\nforall x (Nuzzle(x, peyton) -> Nuzzle(peyton, terrill))\n\nNuzzle(peyton, peyton)\n\nNuzzle(peyton, peyton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1364"} {"premises": "Halley is hiemal. Kassey is barred. All hiemal things are uncolored. If something is uncolored then it is available. Rough things are gruesome. If something is available and not hiemal then it is not barred. If something is invaluable then it is fearful. If something is invaluable and available then it is fearful. If something is available then it is fearful. If Kassey is not available then Kassey is invaluable. Kassey is barred.", "logic": "\nHiemal(halley)\nBarred(kassey)\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Uncolored(x))\nforall x (Uncolored(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Hiemal(x) -> Gruesome(x))\nforall x (Available(x) and not Hiemal(x) -> not Barred(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) -> Fearful(x))\nforall x (Invaluable(x) and Available(x) -> Fearful(x))\nforall x (Available(x) -> Fearful(x))\nnot Available(kassey) -> Invaluable(kassey)\n\nBarred(kassey)\n\ntherefore Barred(kassey)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Zary is fell. Gabriell is lengthways. All fell things are unrewarded. If something is unrewarded then it is exergonic. Rough things are feminine. If something is exergonic and not fell then it is not lengthways. If something is cosher then it is adjacent. If something is cosher and exergonic then it is adjacent. If something is exergonic then it is adjacent. If Gabriell is not exergonic then Gabriell is cosher. Gabriell is not lengthways.", "logic": "\nFell(zary)\nLengthways(gabriell)\nforall x (Fell(x) -> Unrewarded(x))\nforall x (Unrewarded(x) -> Exergonic(x))\nforall x (Fell(x) -> Feminine(x))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) and not Fell(x) -> not Lengthways(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> Adjacent(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) and Exergonic(x) -> Adjacent(x))\nforall x (Exergonic(x) -> Adjacent(x))\nnot Exergonic(gabriell) -> Cosher(gabriell)\n\nnot Lengthways(gabriell)\n\ntherefore Lengthways(gabriell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Cassie is eastward. Liana is incessant. All eastward things are wounded. If something is wounded then it is moralistic. Rough things are myopathic. If something is moralistic and not eastward then it is not incessant. If something is extra then it is paradisal. If something is extra and moralistic then it is paradisal. If something is moralistic then it is paradisal. If Liana is not moralistic then Liana is extra. Cassie is myopathic.", "logic": "\nEastward(cassie)\nIncessant(liana)\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Wounded(x))\nforall x (Wounded(x) -> Moralistic(x))\nforall x (Eastward(x) -> Myopathic(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) and not Eastward(x) -> not Incessant(x))\nforall x (Extra(x) -> Paradisal(x))\nforall x (Extra(x) and Moralistic(x) -> Paradisal(x))\nforall x (Moralistic(x) -> Paradisal(x))\nnot Moralistic(liana) -> Extra(liana)\n\nMyopathic(cassie)\n\nEastward(cassie) and forall x (Eastward(x) -> Myopathic(x)) -> therefore Myopathic(cassie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Debbra is persistent. Wrennie is uncleared. All persistent things are outdated. If something is outdated then it is askew. Rough things are about. If something is askew and not persistent then it is not uncleared. If something is neandertal then it is fictional. If something is neandertal and askew then it is fictional. If something is askew then it is fictional. If Wrennie is not askew then Wrennie is neandertal. Debbra is not outdated.", "logic": "\nPersistent(debbra)\nUncleared(wrennie)\nforall x (Persistent(x) -> Outdated(x))\nforall x (Outdated(x) -> Askew(x))\nforall x (Persistent(x) -> About(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) and not Persistent(x) -> not Uncleared(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) -> Fictional(x))\nforall x (Neandertal(x) and Askew(x) -> Fictional(x))\nforall x (Askew(x) -> Fictional(x))\nnot Askew(wrennie) -> Neandertal(wrennie)\n\nnot Outdated(debbra)\n\nPersistent(debbra) and forall x (Persistent(x) -> Outdated(x)) -> therefore Outdated(debbra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Cesar is governing. Celestyna is pinnatifid. All governing things are barbarian. If something is barbarian then it is nonionic. Rough things are lxxi. If something is nonionic and not governing then it is not pinnatifid. If something is gratis then it is downhill. If something is gratis and nonionic then it is downhill. If something is nonionic then it is downhill. If Celestyna is not nonionic then Celestyna is gratis. Cesar is nonionic.", "logic": "\nGoverning(cesar)\nPinnatifid(celestyna)\nforall x (Governing(x) -> Barbarian(x))\nforall x (Barbarian(x) -> Nonionic(x))\nforall x (Governing(x) -> Lxxi(x))\nforall x (Nonionic(x) and not Governing(x) -> not Pinnatifid(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) -> Downhill(x))\nforall x (Gratis(x) and Nonionic(x) -> Downhill(x))\nforall x (Nonionic(x) -> Downhill(x))\nnot Nonionic(celestyna) -> Gratis(celestyna)\n\nNonionic(cesar)\n\nGoverning(cesar) and forall x (Governing(x) -> Barbarian(x)) -> therefore Barbarian(cesar) Barbarian(cesar) and forall x (Barbarian(x) -> Nonionic(x)) -> therefore Nonionic(cesar)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Scotty is kitschy. Marcille is cervine. All kitschy things are eritrean. If something is eritrean then it is swanky. Rough things are hispanic. If something is swanky and not kitschy then it is not cervine. If something is overfed then it is uniovulate. If something is overfed and swanky then it is uniovulate. If something is swanky then it is uniovulate. If Marcille is not swanky then Marcille is overfed. Scotty is not swanky.", "logic": "\nKitschy(scotty)\nCervine(marcille)\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Eritrean(x))\nforall x (Eritrean(x) -> Swanky(x))\nforall x (Kitschy(x) -> Hispanic(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) and not Kitschy(x) -> not Cervine(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\nforall x (Overfed(x) and Swanky(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\nforall x (Swanky(x) -> Uniovulate(x))\nnot Swanky(marcille) -> Overfed(marcille)\n\nnot Swanky(scotty)\n\nKitschy(scotty) and forall x (Kitschy(x) -> Eritrean(x)) -> therefore Eritrean(scotty) Eritrean(scotty) and forall x (Eritrean(x) -> Swanky(x)) -> therefore Swanky(scotty)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Sheree is mensal. Winthrop is schematic. All mensal things are lunisolar. If something is lunisolar then it is unshackled. Rough things are broiled. If something is unshackled and not mensal then it is not schematic. If something is wound then it is present. If something is wound and unshackled then it is present. If something is unshackled then it is present. If Winthrop is not unshackled then Winthrop is wound. Sheree is present.", "logic": "\nMensal(sheree)\nSchematic(winthrop)\nforall x (Mensal(x) -> Lunisolar(x))\nforall x (Lunisolar(x) -> Unshackled(x))\nforall x (Mensal(x) -> Broiled(x))\nforall x (Unshackled(x) and not Mensal(x) -> not Schematic(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) -> Present(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) and Unshackled(x) -> Present(x))\nforall x (Unshackled(x) -> Present(x))\nnot Unshackled(winthrop) -> Wound(winthrop)\n\nPresent(sheree)\n\nMensal(sheree) and forall x (Mensal(x) -> Lunisolar(x)) -> therefore Lunisolar(sheree) Lunisolar(sheree) and forall x (Lunisolar(x) -> Unshackled(x)) -> therefore Unshackled(sheree) Unshackled(sheree) and forall x (Unshackled(x) -> Present(x)) -> therefore Present(sheree)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Raynell is desecrated. Monty is coloured. All desecrated things are slim. If something is slim then it is canned. Rough things are satyric. If something is canned and not desecrated then it is not coloured. If something is soluble then it is oecumenic. If something is soluble and canned then it is oecumenic. If something is canned then it is oecumenic. If Monty is not canned then Monty is soluble. Raynell is not oecumenic.", "logic": "\nDesecrated(raynell)\nColoured(monty)\nforall x (Desecrated(x) -> Slim(x))\nforall x (Slim(x) -> Canned(x))\nforall x (Desecrated(x) -> Satyric(x))\nforall x (Canned(x) and not Desecrated(x) -> not Coloured(x))\nforall x (Soluble(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Soluble(x) and Canned(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nforall x (Canned(x) -> Oecumenic(x))\nnot Canned(monty) -> Soluble(monty)\n\nnot Oecumenic(raynell)\n\nDesecrated(raynell) and forall x (Desecrated(x) -> Slim(x)) -> therefore Slim(raynell) Slim(raynell) and forall x (Slim(x) -> Canned(x)) -> therefore Canned(raynell) Canned(raynell) and forall x (Canned(x) -> Oecumenic(x)) -> therefore Oecumenic(raynell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Peggi is borderline. Kare is fitter. All borderline things are squandered. If something is squandered then it is sketchy. Rough things are clannish. If something is sketchy and not borderline then it is not fitter. If something is outermost then it is whiskered. If something is outermost and sketchy then it is whiskered. If something is sketchy then it is whiskered. If Kare is not sketchy then Kare is outermost. Kare is not sketchy.", "logic": "\nBorderline(peggi)\nFitter(kare)\nforall x (Borderline(x) -> Squandered(x))\nforall x (Squandered(x) -> Sketchy(x))\nforall x (Borderline(x) -> Clannish(x))\nforall x (Sketchy(x) and not Borderline(x) -> not Fitter(x))\nforall x (Outermost(x) -> Whiskered(x))\nforall x (Outermost(x) and Sketchy(x) -> Whiskered(x))\nforall x (Sketchy(x) -> Whiskered(x))\nnot Sketchy(kare) -> Outermost(kare)\n\nnot Sketchy(kare)\n\nforall x (Squandered(x) -> Sketchy(x)) <- forall x (Borderline(x) -> Squandered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Emyle is ambient. Rivy is cordiform. All ambient things are mystic. If something is mystic then it is bass. Rough things are patient. If something is bass and not ambient then it is not cordiform. If something is alaskan then it is untilled. If something is alaskan and bass then it is untilled. If something is bass then it is untilled. If Rivy is not bass then Rivy is alaskan. Rivy is mystic.", "logic": "\nAmbient(emyle)\nCordiform(rivy)\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> Mystic(x))\nforall x (Mystic(x) -> Bass(x))\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> Patient(x))\nforall x (Bass(x) and not Ambient(x) -> not Cordiform(x))\nforall x (Alaskan(x) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Alaskan(x) and Bass(x) -> Untilled(x))\nforall x (Bass(x) -> Untilled(x))\nnot Bass(rivy) -> Alaskan(rivy)\n\nMystic(rivy)\n\nforall x (Ambient(x) -> Mystic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Carolan is concessive. Flynn is increased. All concessive things are masterly. If something is masterly then it is genetic. Rough things are detractive. If something is genetic and not concessive then it is not increased. If something is brave then it is heartless. If something is brave and genetic then it is heartless. If something is genetic then it is heartless. If Flynn is not genetic then Flynn is brave. Flynn is not brave.", "logic": "\nConcessive(carolan)\nIncreased(flynn)\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> Masterly(x))\nforall x (Masterly(x) -> Genetic(x))\nforall x (Concessive(x) -> Detractive(x))\nforall x (Genetic(x) and not Concessive(x) -> not Increased(x))\nforall x (Brave(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Brave(x) and Genetic(x) -> Heartless(x))\nforall x (Genetic(x) -> Heartless(x))\nnot Genetic(flynn) -> Brave(flynn)\n\nnot Brave(flynn)\n\nnot Genetic(flynn) -> Brave(flynn) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Evan is ungroomed. Shelli is snotty. All ungroomed things are mechanic. If something is mechanic then it is glabellar. Rough things are plumlike. If something is glabellar and not ungroomed then it is not snotty. If something is unvendible then it is propelling. If something is unvendible and glabellar then it is propelling. If something is glabellar then it is propelling. If Shelli is not glabellar then Shelli is unvendible. Shelli is propelling.", "logic": "\nUngroomed(evan)\nSnotty(shelli)\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Mechanic(x))\nforall x (Mechanic(x) -> Glabellar(x))\nforall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Plumlike(x))\nforall x (Glabellar(x) and not Ungroomed(x) -> not Snotty(x))\nforall x (Unvendible(x) -> Propelling(x))\nforall x (Unvendible(x) and Glabellar(x) -> Propelling(x))\nforall x (Glabellar(x) -> Propelling(x))\nnot Glabellar(shelli) -> Unvendible(shelli)\n\nPropelling(shelli)\n\nforall x (Glabellar(x) -> Propelling(x)) <- forall x (Mechanic(x) -> Glabellar(x)) <- forall x (Ungroomed(x) -> Mechanic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Murielle is mirrored. Rania is clastic. All mirrored things are flying. If something is flying then it is astigmatic. Rough things are fluent. If something is astigmatic and not mirrored then it is not clastic. If something is beltless then it is dabbled. If something is beltless and astigmatic then it is dabbled. If something is astigmatic then it is dabbled. If Rania is not astigmatic then Rania is beltless. Rania is not mirrored.", "logic": "\nMirrored(murielle)\nClastic(rania)\nforall x (Mirrored(x) -> Flying(x))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Astigmatic(x))\nforall x (Mirrored(x) -> Fluent(x))\nforall x (Astigmatic(x) and not Mirrored(x) -> not Clastic(x))\nforall x (Beltless(x) -> Dabbled(x))\nforall x (Beltless(x) and Astigmatic(x) -> Dabbled(x))\nforall x (Astigmatic(x) -> Dabbled(x))\nnot Astigmatic(rania) -> Beltless(rania)\n\nnot Mirrored(rania)\n\nnot Mirrored(rania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Janel is monotone. Emelita is vicenary. All monotone things are unwise. If something is unwise then it is fugal. Rough things are floury. If something is fugal and not monotone then it is not vicenary. If something is overgreedy then it is resident. If something is overgreedy and fugal then it is resident. If something is fugal then it is resident. If Emelita is not fugal then Emelita is overgreedy. Janel is vicenary.", "logic": "\nMonotone(janel)\nVicenary(emelita)\nforall x (Monotone(x) -> Unwise(x))\nforall x (Unwise(x) -> Fugal(x))\nforall x (Monotone(x) -> Floury(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) and not Monotone(x) -> not Vicenary(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Overgreedy(x) and Fugal(x) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Fugal(x) -> Resident(x))\nnot Fugal(emelita) -> Overgreedy(emelita)\n\nVicenary(janel)\n\nVicenary(janel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1297"} {"premises": "Korrie is vented. Herschel is prosthetic. Kind, fluid people are bared. All prosthetic, apposite people are fluid. If someone is prosthetic and enhancive then they are apposite. If someone is prosthetic then they are apposite. All apposite, fluid people are auditive. Furry people are vented. Korrie is vented.", "logic": "\nVented(korrie)\nProsthetic(herschel)\nforall x (Auditive(x) and Fluid(x) -> Bared(x))\nforall x (Prosthetic(x) and Apposite(x) -> Fluid(x))\nforall x (Prosthetic(x) and Enhancive(x) -> Apposite(x))\nforall x (Prosthetic(x) -> Apposite(x))\nforall x (Apposite(x) and Fluid(x) -> Auditive(x))\nforall x (Enhancive(x) -> Vented(x))\n\nVented(korrie)\n\ntherefore Vented(korrie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Lorilee is prepaid. Neale is quiescent. Kind, transeunt people are burly. All quiescent, tabby people are transeunt. If someone is quiescent and unplayful then they are tabby. If someone is quiescent then they are tabby. All tabby, transeunt people are liege. Furry people are prepaid. Neale is not quiescent.", "logic": "\nPrepaid(lorilee)\nQuiescent(neale)\nforall x (Liege(x) and Transeunt(x) -> Burly(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) and Tabby(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) and Unplayful(x) -> Tabby(x))\nforall x (Quiescent(x) -> Tabby(x))\nforall x (Tabby(x) and Transeunt(x) -> Liege(x))\nforall x (Unplayful(x) -> Prepaid(x))\n\nnot Quiescent(neale)\n\ntherefore Quiescent(neale)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Wynny is upland. Jody is bipartisan. Kind, biform people are retentive. All bipartisan, elected people are biform. If someone is bipartisan and titulary then they are elected. If someone is bipartisan then they are elected. All elected, biform people are seared. Furry people are upland. Jody is elected.", "logic": "\nUpland(wynny)\nBipartisan(jody)\nforall x (Seared(x) and Biform(x) -> Retentive(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Elected(x) -> Biform(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) and Titulary(x) -> Elected(x))\nforall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Elected(x))\nforall x (Elected(x) and Biform(x) -> Seared(x))\nforall x (Titulary(x) -> Upland(x))\n\nElected(jody)\n\nBipartisan(jody) and forall x (Bipartisan(x) -> Elected(x)) -> therefore Elected(jody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Tre is foolish. Kevan is terete. Kind, enervating people are recessed. All terete, inhibited people are enervating. If someone is terete and slashed then they are inhibited. If someone is terete then they are inhibited. All inhibited, enervating people are based. Furry people are foolish. Kevan is not inhibited.", "logic": "\nFoolish(tre)\nTerete(kevan)\nforall x (Based(x) and Enervating(x) -> Recessed(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) and Inhibited(x) -> Enervating(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) and Slashed(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Terete(x) -> Inhibited(x))\nforall x (Inhibited(x) and Enervating(x) -> Based(x))\nforall x (Slashed(x) -> Foolish(x))\n\nnot Inhibited(kevan)\n\nTerete(kevan) and forall x (Terete(x) -> Inhibited(x)) -> therefore Inhibited(kevan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Lorine is syrupy. Lorenza is chorionic. Kind, volitional people are unmovable. All chorionic, aided people are volitional. If someone is chorionic and double then they are aided. If someone is chorionic then they are aided. All aided, volitional people are leftish. Furry people are syrupy. Lorenza is volitional.", "logic": "\nSyrupy(lorine)\nChorionic(lorenza)\nforall x (Leftish(x) and Volitional(x) -> Unmovable(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) and Aided(x) -> Volitional(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) and Double(x) -> Aided(x))\nforall x (Chorionic(x) -> Aided(x))\nforall x (Aided(x) and Volitional(x) -> Leftish(x))\nforall x (Double(x) -> Syrupy(x))\n\nVolitional(lorenza)\n\nChorionic(lorenza) and forall x (Chorionic(x) -> Aided(x)) -> therefore Aided(lorenza) Chorionic(lorenza) and Aided(lorenza) and forall x (Chorionic(x) and Aided(x) -> Volitional(x)) -> therefore Volitional(lorenza)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Guinevere is inheriting. Friedrich is through. Kind, nude people are aerobic. All through, infrasonic people are nude. If someone is through and frolicky then they are infrasonic. If someone is through then they are infrasonic. All infrasonic, nude people are sapid. Furry people are inheriting. Friedrich is not nude.", "logic": "\nInheriting(guinevere)\nThrough(friedrich)\nforall x (Sapid(x) and Nude(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Through(x) and Infrasonic(x) -> Nude(x))\nforall x (Through(x) and Frolicky(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Through(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) and Nude(x) -> Sapid(x))\nforall x (Frolicky(x) -> Inheriting(x))\n\nnot Nude(friedrich)\n\nThrough(friedrich) and forall x (Through(x) -> Infrasonic(x)) -> therefore Infrasonic(friedrich) Through(friedrich) and Infrasonic(friedrich) and forall x (Through(x) and Infrasonic(x) -> Nude(x)) -> therefore Nude(friedrich)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Nessa is accoutred. Osbourn is airless. Kind, orange people are shameful. All airless, intact people are orange. If someone is airless and cousinly then they are intact. If someone is airless then they are intact. All intact, orange people are affixial. Furry people are accoutred. Osbourn is affixial.", "logic": "\nAccoutred(nessa)\nAirless(osbourn)\nforall x (Affixial(x) and Orange(x) -> Shameful(x))\nforall x (Airless(x) and Intact(x) -> Orange(x))\nforall x (Airless(x) and Cousinly(x) -> Intact(x))\nforall x (Airless(x) -> Intact(x))\nforall x (Intact(x) and Orange(x) -> Affixial(x))\nforall x (Cousinly(x) -> Accoutred(x))\n\nAffixial(osbourn)\n\nAirless(osbourn) and forall x (Airless(x) -> Intact(x)) -> therefore Intact(osbourn) Airless(osbourn) and forall x (Airless(x) -> Intact(x)) -> therefore Intact(osbourn) Airless(osbourn) and Intact(osbourn) and forall x (Airless(x) and Intact(x) -> Orange(x)) -> therefore Orange(osbourn) Intact(osbourn) and Orange(osbourn) and forall x (Intact(x) and Orange(x) -> Affixial(x)) -> therefore Affixial(osbourn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Aubrie is vented. Madelina is hackneyed. Kind, penal people are reclaimed. All hackneyed, cheeky people are penal. If someone is hackneyed and encased then they are cheeky. If someone is hackneyed then they are cheeky. All cheeky, penal people are unreserved. Furry people are vented. Madelina is not unreserved.", "logic": "\nVented(aubrie)\nHackneyed(madelina)\nforall x (Unreserved(x) and Penal(x) -> Reclaimed(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) and Cheeky(x) -> Penal(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) and Encased(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Hackneyed(x) -> Cheeky(x))\nforall x (Cheeky(x) and Penal(x) -> Unreserved(x))\nforall x (Encased(x) -> Vented(x))\n\nnot Unreserved(madelina)\n\nHackneyed(madelina) and forall x (Hackneyed(x) -> Cheeky(x)) -> therefore Cheeky(madelina) Hackneyed(madelina) and forall x (Hackneyed(x) -> Cheeky(x)) -> therefore Cheeky(madelina) Hackneyed(madelina) and Cheeky(madelina) and forall x (Hackneyed(x) and Cheeky(x) -> Penal(x)) -> therefore Penal(madelina) Cheeky(madelina) and Penal(madelina) and forall x (Cheeky(x) and Penal(x) -> Unreserved(x)) -> therefore Unreserved(madelina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Rourke is malformed. Colene is occurrent. Kind, contained people are risen. All occurrent, protozoic people are contained. If someone is occurrent and frivolous then they are protozoic. If someone is occurrent then they are protozoic. All protozoic, contained people are fluid. Furry people are malformed. Rourke is not fluid.", "logic": "\nMalformed(rourke)\nOccurrent(colene)\nforall x (Fluid(x) and Contained(x) -> Risen(x))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) and Protozoic(x) -> Contained(x))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) and Frivolous(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Occurrent(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and Contained(x) -> Fluid(x))\nforall x (Frivolous(x) -> Malformed(x))\n\nnot Fluid(rourke)\n\nforall x (Protozoic(x) and Contained(x) -> Fluid(x)) <- forall x (Occurrent(x) and Frivolous(x) -> Protozoic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Suellen is abstemious. Leticia is picaresque. Kind, chanted people are rejoicing. All picaresque, nonfat people are chanted. If someone is picaresque and unlocked then they are nonfat. If someone is picaresque then they are nonfat. All nonfat, chanted people are spindly. Furry people are abstemious. Suellen is rejoicing.", "logic": "\nAbstemious(suellen)\nPicaresque(leticia)\nforall x (Spindly(x) and Chanted(x) -> Rejoicing(x))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) and Nonfat(x) -> Chanted(x))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) and Unlocked(x) -> Nonfat(x))\nforall x (Picaresque(x) -> Nonfat(x))\nforall x (Nonfat(x) and Chanted(x) -> Spindly(x))\nforall x (Unlocked(x) -> Abstemious(x))\n\nRejoicing(suellen)\n\nforall x (Spindly(x) and Chanted(x) -> Rejoicing(x)) <- forall x (Picaresque(x) and Nonfat(x) -> Chanted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Stevana is gluey. Jewel is upbound. Kind, germy people are frostian. All upbound, oncologic people are germy. If someone is upbound and unarmoured then they are oncologic. If someone is upbound then they are oncologic. All oncologic, germy people are enthralled. Furry people are gluey. Stevana is not germy.", "logic": "\nGluey(stevana)\nUpbound(jewel)\nforall x (Enthralled(x) and Germy(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) and Oncologic(x) -> Germy(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) and Unarmoured(x) -> Oncologic(x))\nforall x (Upbound(x) -> Oncologic(x))\nforall x (Oncologic(x) and Germy(x) -> Enthralled(x))\nforall x (Unarmoured(x) -> Gluey(x))\n\nnot Germy(stevana)\n\nforall x (Upbound(x) and Oncologic(x) -> Germy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Candra is overladen. Aleen is lumbar. Kind, overweight people are northerly. All lumbar, ferocious people are overweight. If someone is lumbar and filipino then they are ferocious. If someone is lumbar then they are ferocious. All ferocious, overweight people are ariose. Furry people are overladen. Aleen is overladen.", "logic": "\nOverladen(candra)\nLumbar(aleen)\nforall x (Ariose(x) and Overweight(x) -> Northerly(x))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) and Ferocious(x) -> Overweight(x))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) and Filipino(x) -> Ferocious(x))\nforall x (Lumbar(x) -> Ferocious(x))\nforall x (Ferocious(x) and Overweight(x) -> Ariose(x))\nforall x (Filipino(x) -> Overladen(x))\n\nOverladen(aleen)\n\nforall x (Filipino(x) -> Overladen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Ernie is wavy. Florance is carolean. Kind, durable people are burnable. All carolean, frostian people are durable. If someone is carolean and perineal then they are frostian. If someone is carolean then they are frostian. All frostian, durable people are chartreuse. Furry people are wavy. Ernie is not perineal.", "logic": "\nWavy(ernie)\nCarolean(florance)\nforall x (Chartreuse(x) and Durable(x) -> Burnable(x))\nforall x (Carolean(x) and Frostian(x) -> Durable(x))\nforall x (Carolean(x) and Perineal(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Carolean(x) -> Frostian(x))\nforall x (Frostian(x) and Durable(x) -> Chartreuse(x))\nforall x (Perineal(x) -> Wavy(x))\n\nnot Perineal(ernie)\n\nnot Perineal(ernie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "Lester is aligned. Otha is greek. Kind, mature people are synoicous. All greek, coagulate people are mature. If someone is greek and costive then they are coagulate. If someone is greek then they are coagulate. All coagulate, mature people are melodious. Furry people are aligned. Lester is greek.", "logic": "\nAligned(lester)\nGreek(otha)\nforall x (Melodious(x) and Mature(x) -> Synoicous(x))\nforall x (Greek(x) and Coagulate(x) -> Mature(x))\nforall x (Greek(x) and Costive(x) -> Coagulate(x))\nforall x (Greek(x) -> Coagulate(x))\nforall x (Coagulate(x) and Mature(x) -> Melodious(x))\nforall x (Costive(x) -> Aligned(x))\n\nGreek(lester)\n\nGreek(lester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-241"} {"premises": "The junia disunite the christina. The hanni disunite the sonia. The christina is flying. The sonia combine the hanni. If the christina combine the junia then the junia comprise the christina. If someone disunite the sonia then they are solved. If someone comprise the sonia and they are unjust then the sonia is asteroidal. If someone comprise the christina then they like the hanni. If someone comprise the christina then the christina combine the junia. If someone is flying then they chase the christina. If someone is stirred then they chase the sonia. If the junia disunite the christina then the junia disunite the hanni. The sonia combine the hanni.", "logic": "\nDisunite(junia, christina)\nDisunite(hanni, sonia)\nFlying(christina)\nCombine(sonia, hanni)\nCombine(christina, junia) -> Comprise(junia, christina)\nforall x (Disunite(x, sonia) -> Solved(x))\nforall x (Comprise(x, sonia) and Unjust(x) -> Asteroidal(sonia))\nforall x (Comprise(x, christina) -> Disunite(x, hanni))\nforall x (Comprise(x, christina) -> Combine(christina, junia))\nforall x (Flying(x) -> Comprise(x, christina))\nforall x (Stirred(x) -> Comprise(x, sonia))\nDisunite(junia, christina) -> Disunite(junia, hanni)\n\nCombine(sonia, hanni)\n\ntherefore Combine(sonia, hanni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The bartlett wrangle the salim. The forrest wrangle the claudio. The salim is forehand. The claudio slump the forrest. If the salim slump the bartlett then the bartlett dehydrate the salim. If someone wrangle the claudio then they are disarming. If someone dehydrate the claudio and they are original then the claudio is soignee. If someone dehydrate the salim then they like the forrest. If someone dehydrate the salim then the salim slump the bartlett. If someone is forehand then they chase the salim. If someone is perpetual then they chase the claudio. If the bartlett wrangle the salim then the bartlett wrangle the forrest. The salim is not forehand.", "logic": "\nWrangle(bartlett, salim)\nWrangle(forrest, claudio)\nForehand(salim)\nSlump(claudio, forrest)\nSlump(salim, bartlett) -> Dehydrate(bartlett, salim)\nforall x (Wrangle(x, claudio) -> Disarming(x))\nforall x (Dehydrate(x, claudio) and Original(x) -> Soignee(claudio))\nforall x (Dehydrate(x, salim) -> Wrangle(x, forrest))\nforall x (Dehydrate(x, salim) -> Slump(salim, bartlett))\nforall x (Forehand(x) -> Dehydrate(x, salim))\nforall x (Perpetual(x) -> Dehydrate(x, claudio))\nWrangle(bartlett, salim) -> Wrangle(bartlett, forrest)\n\nnot Forehand(salim)\n\ntherefore Forehand(salim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The bryana burble the wald. The dustin burble the chance. The wald is preserved. The chance titillate the dustin. If the wald titillate the bryana then the bryana supercede the wald. If someone burble the chance then they are obsessive. If someone supercede the chance and they are boggy then the chance is unavailing. If someone supercede the wald then they like the dustin. If someone supercede the wald then the wald titillate the bryana. If someone is preserved then they chase the wald. If someone is myopathic then they chase the chance. If the bryana burble the wald then the bryana burble the dustin. The bryana burble the dustin.", "logic": "\nBurble(bryana, wald)\nBurble(dustin, chance)\nPreserved(wald)\nTitillate(chance, dustin)\nTitillate(wald, bryana) -> Supercede(bryana, wald)\nforall x (Burble(x, chance) -> Obsessive(x))\nforall x (Supercede(x, chance) and Boggy(x) -> Unavailing(chance))\nforall x (Supercede(x, wald) -> Burble(x, dustin))\nforall x (Supercede(x, wald) -> Titillate(wald, bryana))\nforall x (Preserved(x) -> Supercede(x, wald))\nforall x (Myopathic(x) -> Supercede(x, chance))\nBurble(bryana, wald) -> Burble(bryana, dustin)\n\nBurble(bryana, dustin)\n\nBurble(bryana, wald) and Burble(bryana, wald) -> Burble(bryana, dustin) -> therefore Burble(bryana, dustin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The valli rein the chaddy. The clayborn rein the aleecia. The chaddy is insurable. The aleecia hobnob the clayborn. If the chaddy hobnob the valli then the valli eradicate the chaddy. If someone rein the aleecia then they are ebionite. If someone eradicate the aleecia and they are shitless then the aleecia is xanthous. If someone eradicate the chaddy then they like the clayborn. If someone eradicate the chaddy then the chaddy hobnob the valli. If someone is insurable then they chase the chaddy. If someone is askance then they chase the aleecia. If the valli rein the chaddy then the valli rein the clayborn. The valli does not like the clayborn.", "logic": "\nRein(valli, chaddy)\nRein(clayborn, aleecia)\nInsurable(chaddy)\nHobnob(aleecia, clayborn)\nHobnob(chaddy, valli) -> Eradicate(valli, chaddy)\nforall x (Rein(x, aleecia) -> Ebionite(x))\nforall x (Eradicate(x, aleecia) and Shitless(x) -> Xanthous(aleecia))\nforall x (Eradicate(x, chaddy) -> Rein(x, clayborn))\nforall x (Eradicate(x, chaddy) -> Hobnob(chaddy, valli))\nforall x (Insurable(x) -> Eradicate(x, chaddy))\nforall x (Askance(x) -> Eradicate(x, aleecia))\nRein(valli, chaddy) -> Rein(valli, clayborn)\n\nnot Rein(valli, clayborn)\n\nRein(valli, chaddy) and Rein(valli, chaddy) -> Rein(valli, clayborn) -> therefore Rein(valli, clayborn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The demetri etherize the clair. The susannah etherize the ronni. The clair is vaginal. The ronni claver the susannah. If the clair claver the demetri then the demetri qualify the clair. If someone etherize the ronni then they are diocesan. If someone qualify the ronni and they are sadducean then the ronni is xenophobic. If someone qualify the clair then they like the susannah. If someone qualify the clair then the clair claver the demetri. If someone is vaginal then they chase the clair. If someone is agamous then they chase the ronni. If the demetri etherize the clair then the demetri etherize the susannah. The clair claver the demetri.", "logic": "\nEtherize(demetri, clair)\nEtherize(susannah, ronni)\nVaginal(clair)\nClaver(ronni, susannah)\nClaver(clair, demetri) -> Qualify(demetri, clair)\nforall x (Etherize(x, ronni) -> Diocesan(x))\nforall x (Qualify(x, ronni) and Sadducean(x) -> Xenophobic(ronni))\nforall x (Qualify(x, clair) -> Etherize(x, susannah))\nforall x (Qualify(x, clair) -> Claver(clair, demetri))\nforall x (Vaginal(x) -> Qualify(x, clair))\nforall x (Agamous(x) -> Qualify(x, ronni))\nEtherize(demetri, clair) -> Etherize(demetri, susannah)\n\nClaver(clair, demetri)\n\nVaginal(clair) and forall x (Vaginal(x) -> Qualify(x, clair)) -> therefore Qualify(clair, clair) Qualify(clair, clair) and forall x (Qualify(x, clair) -> Claver(clair, demetri)) -> therefore Claver(clair, demetri)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The will purse the kath. The hattie purse the aurora. The kath is silken. The aurora tire the hattie. If the kath tire the will then the will disembroil the kath. If someone purse the aurora then they are blindfold. If someone disembroil the aurora and they are refulgent then the aurora is implicated. If someone disembroil the kath then they like the hattie. If someone disembroil the kath then the kath tire the will. If someone is silken then they chase the kath. If someone is pasted then they chase the aurora. If the will purse the kath then the will purse the hattie. The kath does not like the hattie.", "logic": "\nPurse(will, kath)\nPurse(hattie, aurora)\nSilken(kath)\nTire(aurora, hattie)\nTire(kath, will) -> Disembroil(will, kath)\nforall x (Purse(x, aurora) -> Blindfold(x))\nforall x (Disembroil(x, aurora) and Refulgent(x) -> Implicated(aurora))\nforall x (Disembroil(x, kath) -> Purse(x, hattie))\nforall x (Disembroil(x, kath) -> Tire(kath, will))\nforall x (Silken(x) -> Disembroil(x, kath))\nforall x (Pasted(x) -> Disembroil(x, aurora))\nPurse(will, kath) -> Purse(will, hattie)\n\nnot Purse(kath, hattie)\n\nSilken(kath) and forall x (Silken(x) -> Disembroil(x, kath)) -> therefore Disembroil(kath, kath) Disembroil(kath, kath) and forall x (Disembroil(x, kath) -> Purse(x, hattie)) -> therefore Purse(kath, hattie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The aloisia generalise the hetti. The nealon generalise the flemming. The hetti is mastered. The flemming tremble the nealon. If the hetti tremble the aloisia then the aloisia evaluate the hetti. If someone generalise the flemming then they are desiccate. If someone evaluate the flemming and they are wordless then the flemming is glimmery. If someone evaluate the hetti then they like the nealon. If someone evaluate the hetti then the hetti tremble the aloisia. If someone is mastered then they chase the hetti. If someone is frigorific then they chase the flemming. If the aloisia generalise the hetti then the aloisia generalise the nealon. The aloisia evaluate the hetti.", "logic": "\nGeneralise(aloisia, hetti)\nGeneralise(nealon, flemming)\nMastered(hetti)\nTremble(flemming, nealon)\nTremble(hetti, aloisia) -> Evaluate(aloisia, hetti)\nforall x (Generalise(x, flemming) -> Desiccate(x))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, flemming) and Wordless(x) -> Glimmery(flemming))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, hetti) -> Generalise(x, nealon))\nforall x (Evaluate(x, hetti) -> Tremble(hetti, aloisia))\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Evaluate(x, hetti))\nforall x (Frigorific(x) -> Evaluate(x, flemming))\nGeneralise(aloisia, hetti) -> Generalise(aloisia, nealon)\n\nEvaluate(aloisia, hetti)\n\nMastered(hetti) and forall x (Mastered(x) -> Evaluate(x, hetti)) -> therefore Evaluate(hetti, hetti) Evaluate(hetti, hetti) and forall x (Evaluate(x, hetti) -> Tremble(hetti, aloisia)) -> therefore Tremble(hetti, aloisia) Tremble(hetti, aloisia) and Tremble(hetti, aloisia) -> Evaluate(aloisia, hetti) -> therefore Evaluate(aloisia, hetti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The nerta intonate the cody. The noami intonate the nathanil. The cody is assigned. The nathanil bench the noami. If the cody bench the nerta then the nerta gibbet the cody. If someone intonate the nathanil then they are biting. If someone gibbet the nathanil and they are honied then the nathanil is modeled. If someone gibbet the cody then they like the noami. If someone gibbet the cody then the cody bench the nerta. If someone is assigned then they chase the cody. If someone is frivolous then they chase the nathanil. If the nerta intonate the cody then the nerta intonate the noami. The nerta does not chase the cody.", "logic": "\nIntonate(nerta, cody)\nIntonate(noami, nathanil)\nAssigned(cody)\nBench(nathanil, noami)\nBench(cody, nerta) -> Gibbet(nerta, cody)\nforall x (Intonate(x, nathanil) -> Biting(x))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, nathanil) and Honied(x) -> Modeled(nathanil))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, cody) -> Intonate(x, noami))\nforall x (Gibbet(x, cody) -> Bench(cody, nerta))\nforall x (Assigned(x) -> Gibbet(x, cody))\nforall x (Frivolous(x) -> Gibbet(x, nathanil))\nIntonate(nerta, cody) -> Intonate(nerta, noami)\n\nnot Gibbet(nerta, cody)\n\nAssigned(cody) and forall x (Assigned(x) -> Gibbet(x, cody)) -> therefore Gibbet(cody, cody) Gibbet(cody, cody) and forall x (Gibbet(x, cody) -> Bench(cody, nerta)) -> therefore Bench(cody, nerta) Bench(cody, nerta) and Bench(cody, nerta) -> Gibbet(nerta, cody) -> therefore Gibbet(nerta, cody)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The giacomo skim the marcile. The lynsey skim the davidson. The marcile is volar. The davidson complicate the lynsey. If the marcile complicate the giacomo then the giacomo digest the marcile. If someone skim the davidson then they are advisory. If someone digest the davidson and they are mistreated then the davidson is sacked. If someone digest the marcile then they like the lynsey. If someone digest the marcile then the marcile complicate the giacomo. If someone is volar then they chase the marcile. If someone is nucleated then they chase the davidson. If the giacomo skim the marcile then the giacomo skim the lynsey. The lynsey does not chase the marcile.", "logic": "\nSkim(giacomo, marcile)\nSkim(lynsey, davidson)\nVolar(marcile)\nComplicate(davidson, lynsey)\nComplicate(marcile, giacomo) -> Digest(giacomo, marcile)\nforall x (Skim(x, davidson) -> Advisory(x))\nforall x (Digest(x, davidson) and Mistreated(x) -> Sacked(davidson))\nforall x (Digest(x, marcile) -> Skim(x, lynsey))\nforall x (Digest(x, marcile) -> Complicate(marcile, giacomo))\nforall x (Volar(x) -> Digest(x, marcile))\nforall x (Nucleated(x) -> Digest(x, davidson))\nSkim(giacomo, marcile) -> Skim(giacomo, lynsey)\n\nnot Digest(lynsey, marcile)\n\nforall x (Volar(x) -> Digest(x, marcile)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The colette bewitch the evy. The mirabel bewitch the remy. The evy is enceinte. The remy gown the mirabel. If the evy gown the colette then the colette enter the evy. If someone bewitch the remy then they are fried. If someone enter the remy and they are transeunt then the remy is outspoken. If someone enter the evy then they like the mirabel. If someone enter the evy then the evy gown the colette. If someone is enceinte then they chase the evy. If someone is ironclad then they chase the remy. If the colette bewitch the evy then the colette bewitch the mirabel. The evy enter the remy.", "logic": "\nBewitch(colette, evy)\nBewitch(mirabel, remy)\nEnceinte(evy)\nGown(remy, mirabel)\nGown(evy, colette) -> Enter(colette, evy)\nforall x (Bewitch(x, remy) -> Fried(x))\nforall x (Enter(x, remy) and Transeunt(x) -> Outspoken(remy))\nforall x (Enter(x, evy) -> Bewitch(x, mirabel))\nforall x (Enter(x, evy) -> Gown(evy, colette))\nforall x (Enceinte(x) -> Enter(x, evy))\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Enter(x, remy))\nBewitch(colette, evy) -> Bewitch(colette, mirabel)\n\nEnter(evy, remy)\n\nforall x (Ironclad(x) -> Enter(x, remy)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The christie annoy the minerva. The bertina annoy the cecile. The minerva is maggoty. The cecile muckrake the bertina. If the minerva muckrake the christie then the christie solarise the minerva. If someone annoy the cecile then they are palladian. If someone solarise the cecile and they are fitting then the cecile is impelling. If someone solarise the minerva then they like the bertina. If someone solarise the minerva then the minerva muckrake the christie. If someone is maggoty then they chase the minerva. If someone is franciscan then they chase the cecile. If the christie annoy the minerva then the christie annoy the bertina. The cecile does not like the bertina.", "logic": "\nAnnoy(christie, minerva)\nAnnoy(bertina, cecile)\nMaggoty(minerva)\nMuckrake(cecile, bertina)\nMuckrake(minerva, christie) -> Solarise(christie, minerva)\nforall x (Annoy(x, cecile) -> Palladian(x))\nforall x (Solarise(x, cecile) and Fitting(x) -> Impelling(cecile))\nforall x (Solarise(x, minerva) -> Annoy(x, bertina))\nforall x (Solarise(x, minerva) -> Muckrake(minerva, christie))\nforall x (Maggoty(x) -> Solarise(x, minerva))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) -> Solarise(x, cecile))\nAnnoy(christie, minerva) -> Annoy(christie, bertina)\n\nnot Annoy(cecile, bertina)\n\nforall x (Solarise(x, minerva) -> Annoy(x, bertina)) <- forall x (Maggoty(x) -> Solarise(x, minerva)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The perle pique the welch. The analise pique the donnie. The welch is inhumed. The donnie objurgate the analise. If the welch objurgate the perle then the perle anoint the welch. If someone pique the donnie then they are maledict. If someone anoint the donnie and they are aleutian then the donnie is technical. If someone anoint the welch then they like the analise. If someone anoint the welch then the welch objurgate the perle. If someone is inhumed then they chase the welch. If someone is coagulate then they chase the donnie. If the perle pique the welch then the perle pique the analise. The analise anoint the donnie.", "logic": "\nPique(perle, welch)\nPique(analise, donnie)\nInhumed(welch)\nObjurgate(donnie, analise)\nObjurgate(welch, perle) -> Anoint(perle, welch)\nforall x (Pique(x, donnie) -> Maledict(x))\nforall x (Anoint(x, donnie) and Aleutian(x) -> Technical(donnie))\nforall x (Anoint(x, welch) -> Pique(x, analise))\nforall x (Anoint(x, welch) -> Objurgate(welch, perle))\nforall x (Inhumed(x) -> Anoint(x, welch))\nforall x (Coagulate(x) -> Anoint(x, donnie))\nPique(perle, welch) -> Pique(perle, analise)\n\nAnoint(analise, donnie)\n\nforall x (Coagulate(x) -> Anoint(x, donnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The phylis crunch the arvie. The marylee crunch the karlotta. The arvie is dapper. The karlotta rape the marylee. If the arvie rape the phylis then the phylis decorate the arvie. If someone crunch the karlotta then they are stylistic. If someone decorate the karlotta and they are satiated then the karlotta is arcane. If someone decorate the arvie then they like the marylee. If someone decorate the arvie then the arvie rape the phylis. If someone is dapper then they chase the arvie. If someone is ignored then they chase the karlotta. If the phylis crunch the arvie then the phylis crunch the marylee. The arvie is not ignored.", "logic": "\nCrunch(phylis, arvie)\nCrunch(marylee, karlotta)\nDapper(arvie)\nRape(karlotta, marylee)\nRape(arvie, phylis) -> Decorate(phylis, arvie)\nforall x (Crunch(x, karlotta) -> Stylistic(x))\nforall x (Decorate(x, karlotta) and Satiated(x) -> Arcane(karlotta))\nforall x (Decorate(x, arvie) -> Crunch(x, marylee))\nforall x (Decorate(x, arvie) -> Rape(arvie, phylis))\nforall x (Dapper(x) -> Decorate(x, arvie))\nforall x (Ignored(x) -> Decorate(x, karlotta))\nCrunch(phylis, arvie) -> Crunch(phylis, marylee)\n\nnot Ignored(arvie)\n\nnot Ignored(arvie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The philbert chart the klara. The stephenie chart the hamel. The klara is uncrossed. The hamel mortify the stephenie. If the klara mortify the philbert then the philbert channelise the klara. If someone chart the hamel then they are monotonic. If someone channelise the hamel and they are leprose then the hamel is headless. If someone channelise the klara then they like the stephenie. If someone channelise the klara then the klara mortify the philbert. If someone is uncrossed then they chase the klara. If someone is gymnastic then they chase the hamel. If the philbert chart the klara then the philbert chart the stephenie. The hamel channelise the philbert.", "logic": "\nChart(philbert, klara)\nChart(stephenie, hamel)\nUncrossed(klara)\nMortify(hamel, stephenie)\nMortify(klara, philbert) -> Channelise(philbert, klara)\nforall x (Chart(x, hamel) -> Monotonic(x))\nforall x (Channelise(x, hamel) and Leprose(x) -> Headless(hamel))\nforall x (Channelise(x, klara) -> Chart(x, stephenie))\nforall x (Channelise(x, klara) -> Mortify(klara, philbert))\nforall x (Uncrossed(x) -> Channelise(x, klara))\nforall x (Gymnastic(x) -> Channelise(x, hamel))\nChart(philbert, klara) -> Chart(philbert, stephenie)\n\nChannelise(hamel, philbert)\n\nChannelise(hamel, philbert) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The gleda decoke the phil. The mable decoke the wendeline. The phil is cataclinal. The wendeline rage the mable. If the phil rage the gleda then the gleda crosshatch the phil. If someone decoke the wendeline then they are reducible. If someone crosshatch the wendeline and they are binaural then the wendeline is faux. If someone crosshatch the phil then they like the mable. If someone crosshatch the phil then the phil rage the gleda. If someone is cataclinal then they chase the phil. If someone is baneful then they chase the wendeline. If the gleda decoke the phil then the gleda decoke the mable. The gleda does not eat the phil.", "logic": "\nDecoke(gleda, phil)\nDecoke(mable, wendeline)\nCataclinal(phil)\nRage(wendeline, mable)\nRage(phil, gleda) -> Crosshatch(gleda, phil)\nforall x (Decoke(x, wendeline) -> Reducible(x))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, wendeline) and Binaural(x) -> Faux(wendeline))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, phil) -> Decoke(x, mable))\nforall x (Crosshatch(x, phil) -> Rage(phil, gleda))\nforall x (Cataclinal(x) -> Crosshatch(x, phil))\nforall x (Baneful(x) -> Crosshatch(x, wendeline))\nDecoke(gleda, phil) -> Decoke(gleda, mable)\n\nnot Rage(gleda, phil)\n\nnot Rage(gleda, phil) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The bernita muster the cooper. The haily muster the lauren. The cooper is planar. The lauren blend the haily. If the cooper blend the bernita then the bernita draggle the cooper. If someone muster the lauren then they are neurotic. If someone draggle the lauren and they are sporty then the lauren is bleached. If someone draggle the cooper then they like the haily. If someone draggle the cooper then the cooper blend the bernita. If someone is planar then they chase the cooper. If someone is proustian then they chase the lauren. If the bernita muster the cooper then the bernita muster the haily. The bernita is proustian.", "logic": "\nMuster(bernita, cooper)\nMuster(haily, lauren)\nPlanar(cooper)\nBlend(lauren, haily)\nBlend(cooper, bernita) -> Draggle(bernita, cooper)\nforall x (Muster(x, lauren) -> Neurotic(x))\nforall x (Draggle(x, lauren) and Sporty(x) -> Bleached(lauren))\nforall x (Draggle(x, cooper) -> Muster(x, haily))\nforall x (Draggle(x, cooper) -> Blend(cooper, bernita))\nforall x (Planar(x) -> Draggle(x, cooper))\nforall x (Proustian(x) -> Draggle(x, lauren))\nMuster(bernita, cooper) -> Muster(bernita, haily)\n\nProustian(bernita)\n\nProustian(bernita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1566"} {"premises": "The sheppard potentiate the miriam. The sheppard is trabeate. The sheppard is undersexed. The sheppard is wilsonian. The sheppard is sacculate. The sheppard is waiting. The sheppard excogitate the miriam. The sheppard outsell the miriam. The miriam potentiate the sheppard. The miriam is wilsonian. The miriam is waiting. The miriam excogitate the sheppard. If something potentiate the miriam and it excogitate the miriam then it excogitate the sheppard. If something excogitate the sheppard then it outsell the sheppard. The sheppard potentiate the miriam.", "logic": "\nPotentiate(sheppard, miriam)\nTrabeate(sheppard)\nUndersexed(sheppard)\nWilsonian(sheppard)\nSacculate(sheppard)\nWaiting(sheppard)\nExcogitate(sheppard, miriam)\nOutsell(sheppard, miriam)\nPotentiate(miriam, sheppard)\nWilsonian(miriam)\nWaiting(miriam)\nExcogitate(miriam, sheppard)\nforall x (Potentiate(x, miriam) and Excogitate(x, miriam) -> Excogitate(x, sheppard))\nforall x (Excogitate(x, sheppard) -> Outsell(x, sheppard))\n\nPotentiate(sheppard, miriam)\n\ntherefore Potentiate(sheppard, miriam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3833"} {"premises": "The noelani rebound the abbot. The noelani is inbuilt. The noelani is brilliant. The noelani is norse. The noelani is ebracteate. The noelani is tragicomic. The noelani regorge the abbot. The noelani recrudesce the abbot. The abbot rebound the noelani. The abbot is norse. The abbot is tragicomic. The abbot regorge the noelani. If something rebound the abbot and it regorge the abbot then it regorge the noelani. If something regorge the noelani then it recrudesce the noelani. The noelani is not ebracteate.", "logic": "\nRebound(noelani, abbot)\nInbuilt(noelani)\nBrilliant(noelani)\nNorse(noelani)\nEbracteate(noelani)\nTragicomic(noelani)\nRegorge(noelani, abbot)\nRecrudesce(noelani, abbot)\nRebound(abbot, noelani)\nNorse(abbot)\nTragicomic(abbot)\nRegorge(abbot, noelani)\nforall x (Rebound(x, abbot) and Regorge(x, abbot) -> Regorge(x, noelani))\nforall x (Regorge(x, noelani) -> Recrudesce(x, noelani))\n\nnot Ebracteate(noelani)\n\ntherefore Ebracteate(noelani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3833"} {"premises": "The jania recopy the catriona. The jania is unfinished. The jania is dear. The jania is subliminal. The jania is upraised. The jania is prox. The jania talk the catriona. The jania predict the catriona. The catriona recopy the jania. The catriona is subliminal. The catriona is prox. The catriona talk the jania. If something recopy the catriona and it talk the catriona then it talk the jania. If something talk the jania then it predict the jania. The jania does not chase the jania.", "logic": "\nRecopy(jania, catriona)\nUnfinished(jania)\nDear(jania)\nSubliminal(jania)\nUpraised(jania)\nProx(jania)\nTalk(jania, catriona)\nPredict(jania, catriona)\nRecopy(catriona, jania)\nSubliminal(catriona)\nProx(catriona)\nTalk(catriona, jania)\nforall x (Recopy(x, catriona) and Talk(x, catriona) -> Talk(x, jania))\nforall x (Talk(x, jania) -> Predict(x, jania))\n\nnot Recopy(jania, jania)\n\nnot Recopy(jania, jania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3833"} {"premises": "The adaline unchain the maura. The adaline is restful. The adaline is swank. The adaline is frigid. The adaline is medium. The adaline is gigantic. The adaline cipher the maura. The adaline reunify the maura. The maura unchain the adaline. The maura is frigid. The maura is gigantic. The maura cipher the adaline. If something unchain the maura and it cipher the maura then it cipher the adaline. If something cipher the adaline then it reunify the adaline. The maura reunify the maura.", "logic": "\nUnchain(adaline, maura)\nRestful(adaline)\nSwank(adaline)\nFrigid(adaline)\nMedium(adaline)\nGigantic(adaline)\nCipher(adaline, maura)\nReunify(adaline, maura)\nUnchain(maura, adaline)\nFrigid(maura)\nGigantic(maura)\nCipher(maura, adaline)\nforall x (Unchain(x, maura) and Cipher(x, maura) -> Cipher(x, adaline))\nforall x (Cipher(x, adaline) -> Reunify(x, adaline))\n\nReunify(maura, maura)\n\nReunify(maura, maura) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3833"} {"premises": "The lazaro is ungallant. The lazaro is vixenish. The wells is banausic. If the wells buttweld the lazaro then the lazaro buttweld the wells. If something buttweld the lazaro then the lazaro quibble the wells. If something is vixenish then it buttweld the lazaro. If something is banausic then it demonetise the lazaro. If something quibble the wells then the wells quibble the lazaro. If something is ungallant and it quibble the lazaro then the lazaro is vixenish. The lazaro is ungallant.", "logic": "\nUngallant(lazaro)\nVixenish(lazaro)\nBanausic(wells)\nButtweld(wells, lazaro) -> Buttweld(lazaro, wells)\nforall x (Buttweld(x, lazaro) -> Quibble(lazaro, wells))\nforall x (Vixenish(x) -> Buttweld(x, lazaro))\nforall x (Banausic(x) -> Demonetise(x, lazaro))\nforall x (Quibble(x, wells) -> Quibble(wells, lazaro))\nforall x (Ungallant(x) and Quibble(x, lazaro) -> Vixenish(lazaro))\n\nUngallant(lazaro)\n\ntherefore Ungallant(lazaro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The maryjane is caring. The maryjane is barricaded. The aggie is unseemly. If the aggie heal the maryjane then the maryjane heal the aggie. If something heal the maryjane then the maryjane crook the aggie. If something is barricaded then it heal the maryjane. If something is unseemly then it lipread the maryjane. If something crook the aggie then the aggie crook the maryjane. If something is caring and it crook the maryjane then the maryjane is barricaded. The maryjane is not caring.", "logic": "\nCaring(maryjane)\nBarricaded(maryjane)\nUnseemly(aggie)\nHeal(aggie, maryjane) -> Heal(maryjane, aggie)\nforall x (Heal(x, maryjane) -> Crook(maryjane, aggie))\nforall x (Barricaded(x) -> Heal(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Unseemly(x) -> Lipread(x, maryjane))\nforall x (Crook(x, aggie) -> Crook(aggie, maryjane))\nforall x (Caring(x) and Crook(x, maryjane) -> Barricaded(maryjane))\n\nnot Caring(maryjane)\n\ntherefore Caring(maryjane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The billy is shakeable. The billy is norse. The monty is recognized. If the monty weed the billy then the billy weed the monty. If something weed the billy then the billy stain the monty. If something is norse then it weed the billy. If something is recognized then it inoculate the billy. If something stain the monty then the monty stain the billy. If something is shakeable and it stain the billy then the billy is norse. The monty inoculate the billy.", "logic": "\nShakeable(billy)\nNorse(billy)\nRecognized(monty)\nWeed(monty, billy) -> Weed(billy, monty)\nforall x (Weed(x, billy) -> Stain(billy, monty))\nforall x (Norse(x) -> Weed(x, billy))\nforall x (Recognized(x) -> Inoculate(x, billy))\nforall x (Stain(x, monty) -> Stain(monty, billy))\nforall x (Shakeable(x) and Stain(x, billy) -> Norse(billy))\n\nInoculate(monty, billy)\n\nRecognized(monty) and forall x (Recognized(x) -> Inoculate(x, billy)) -> therefore Inoculate(monty, billy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The ninette is nucleate. The ninette is petite. The mabel is muted. If the mabel bonderize the ninette then the ninette bonderize the mabel. If something bonderize the ninette then the ninette wrinkle the mabel. If something is petite then it bonderize the ninette. If something is muted then it sleet the ninette. If something wrinkle the mabel then the mabel wrinkle the ninette. If something is nucleate and it wrinkle the ninette then the ninette is petite. The ninette does not like the ninette.", "logic": "\nNucleate(ninette)\nPetite(ninette)\nMuted(mabel)\nBonderize(mabel, ninette) -> Bonderize(ninette, mabel)\nforall x (Bonderize(x, ninette) -> Wrinkle(ninette, mabel))\nforall x (Petite(x) -> Bonderize(x, ninette))\nforall x (Muted(x) -> Sleet(x, ninette))\nforall x (Wrinkle(x, mabel) -> Wrinkle(mabel, ninette))\nforall x (Nucleate(x) and Wrinkle(x, ninette) -> Petite(ninette))\n\nnot Bonderize(ninette, ninette)\n\nPetite(ninette) and forall x (Petite(x) -> Bonderize(x, ninette)) -> therefore Bonderize(ninette, ninette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The maia is hebraic. The maia is headed. The belle is peripteral. If the belle munition the maia then the maia munition the belle. If something munition the maia then the maia exist the belle. If something is headed then it munition the maia. If something is peripteral then it denote the maia. If something exist the belle then the belle exist the maia. If something is hebraic and it exist the maia then the maia is headed. The maia exist the belle.", "logic": "\nHebraic(maia)\nHeaded(maia)\nPeripteral(belle)\nMunition(belle, maia) -> Munition(maia, belle)\nforall x (Munition(x, maia) -> Exist(maia, belle))\nforall x (Headed(x) -> Munition(x, maia))\nforall x (Peripteral(x) -> Denote(x, maia))\nforall x (Exist(x, belle) -> Exist(belle, maia))\nforall x (Hebraic(x) and Exist(x, maia) -> Headed(maia))\n\nExist(maia, belle)\n\nHeaded(maia) and forall x (Headed(x) -> Munition(x, maia)) -> therefore Munition(maia, maia) Munition(maia, maia) and forall x (Munition(x, maia) -> Exist(maia, belle)) -> therefore Exist(maia, belle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The roderick is unsounded. The roderick is ebionite. The robert is unsightly. If the robert inclose the roderick then the roderick inclose the robert. If something inclose the roderick then the roderick miaow the robert. If something is ebionite then it inclose the roderick. If something is unsightly then it brad the roderick. If something miaow the robert then the robert miaow the roderick. If something is unsounded and it miaow the roderick then the roderick is ebionite. The roderick does not visit the robert.", "logic": "\nUnsounded(roderick)\nEbionite(roderick)\nUnsightly(robert)\nInclose(robert, roderick) -> Inclose(roderick, robert)\nforall x (Inclose(x, roderick) -> Miaow(roderick, robert))\nforall x (Ebionite(x) -> Inclose(x, roderick))\nforall x (Unsightly(x) -> Brad(x, roderick))\nforall x (Miaow(x, robert) -> Miaow(robert, roderick))\nforall x (Unsounded(x) and Miaow(x, roderick) -> Ebionite(roderick))\n\nnot Miaow(roderick, robert)\n\nEbionite(roderick) and forall x (Ebionite(x) -> Inclose(x, roderick)) -> therefore Inclose(roderick, roderick) Inclose(roderick, roderick) and forall x (Inclose(x, roderick) -> Miaow(roderick, robert)) -> therefore Miaow(roderick, robert)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The bonnie is respondent. The bonnie is rascally. The garth is stereo. If the garth immobilise the bonnie then the bonnie immobilise the garth. If something immobilise the bonnie then the bonnie outline the garth. If something is rascally then it immobilise the bonnie. If something is stereo then it chin the bonnie. If something outline the garth then the garth outline the bonnie. If something is respondent and it outline the bonnie then the bonnie is rascally. The garth outline the bonnie.", "logic": "\nRespondent(bonnie)\nRascally(bonnie)\nStereo(garth)\nImmobilise(garth, bonnie) -> Immobilise(bonnie, garth)\nforall x (Immobilise(x, bonnie) -> Outline(bonnie, garth))\nforall x (Rascally(x) -> Immobilise(x, bonnie))\nforall x (Stereo(x) -> Chin(x, bonnie))\nforall x (Outline(x, garth) -> Outline(garth, bonnie))\nforall x (Respondent(x) and Outline(x, bonnie) -> Rascally(bonnie))\n\nOutline(garth, bonnie)\n\nRascally(bonnie) and forall x (Rascally(x) -> Immobilise(x, bonnie)) -> therefore Immobilise(bonnie, bonnie) Immobilise(bonnie, bonnie) and forall x (Immobilise(x, bonnie) -> Outline(bonnie, garth)) -> therefore Outline(bonnie, garth) Outline(bonnie, garth) and forall x (Outline(x, garth) -> Outline(garth, bonnie)) -> therefore Outline(garth, bonnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The montague is backswept. The montague is acid. The jeromy is unfurrowed. If the jeromy cannonade the montague then the montague cannonade the jeromy. If something cannonade the montague then the montague gaggle the jeromy. If something is acid then it cannonade the montague. If something is unfurrowed then it whittle the montague. If something gaggle the jeromy then the jeromy gaggle the montague. If something is backswept and it gaggle the montague then the montague is acid. The jeromy does not visit the montague.", "logic": "\nBackswept(montague)\nAcid(montague)\nUnfurrowed(jeromy)\nCannonade(jeromy, montague) -> Cannonade(montague, jeromy)\nforall x (Cannonade(x, montague) -> Gaggle(montague, jeromy))\nforall x (Acid(x) -> Cannonade(x, montague))\nforall x (Unfurrowed(x) -> Whittle(x, montague))\nforall x (Gaggle(x, jeromy) -> Gaggle(jeromy, montague))\nforall x (Backswept(x) and Gaggle(x, montague) -> Acid(montague))\n\nnot Gaggle(jeromy, montague)\n\nAcid(montague) and forall x (Acid(x) -> Cannonade(x, montague)) -> therefore Cannonade(montague, montague) Cannonade(montague, montague) and forall x (Cannonade(x, montague) -> Gaggle(montague, jeromy)) -> therefore Gaggle(montague, jeromy) Gaggle(montague, jeromy) and forall x (Gaggle(x, jeromy) -> Gaggle(jeromy, montague)) -> therefore Gaggle(jeromy, montague)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The aldrich is matted. The aldrich is hedged. The staffard is dioestrual. If the staffard foul the aldrich then the aldrich foul the staffard. If something foul the aldrich then the aldrich develop the staffard. If something is hedged then it foul the aldrich. If something is dioestrual then it blat the aldrich. If something develop the staffard then the staffard develop the aldrich. If something is matted and it develop the aldrich then the aldrich is hedged. The aldrich does not like the staffard.", "logic": "\nMatted(aldrich)\nHedged(aldrich)\nDioestrual(staffard)\nFoul(staffard, aldrich) -> Foul(aldrich, staffard)\nforall x (Foul(x, aldrich) -> Develop(aldrich, staffard))\nforall x (Hedged(x) -> Foul(x, aldrich))\nforall x (Dioestrual(x) -> Blat(x, aldrich))\nforall x (Develop(x, staffard) -> Develop(staffard, aldrich))\nforall x (Matted(x) and Develop(x, aldrich) -> Hedged(aldrich))\n\nnot Foul(aldrich, staffard)\n\nFoul(staffard, aldrich) -> Foul(aldrich, staffard) <- forall x (Hedged(x) -> Foul(x, aldrich)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The amberly is amoebic. The amberly is maternal. The katuscha is standard. If the katuscha indemnify the amberly then the amberly indemnify the katuscha. If something indemnify the amberly then the amberly pimp the katuscha. If something is maternal then it indemnify the amberly. If something is standard then it farm the amberly. If something pimp the katuscha then the katuscha pimp the amberly. If something is amoebic and it pimp the amberly then the amberly is maternal. The amberly farm the amberly.", "logic": "\nAmoebic(amberly)\nMaternal(amberly)\nStandard(katuscha)\nIndemnify(katuscha, amberly) -> Indemnify(amberly, katuscha)\nforall x (Indemnify(x, amberly) -> Pimp(amberly, katuscha))\nforall x (Maternal(x) -> Indemnify(x, amberly))\nforall x (Standard(x) -> Farm(x, amberly))\nforall x (Pimp(x, katuscha) -> Pimp(katuscha, amberly))\nforall x (Amoebic(x) and Pimp(x, amberly) -> Maternal(amberly))\n\nFarm(amberly, amberly)\n\nforall x (Standard(x) -> Farm(x, amberly)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The leeanne is unreserved. The leeanne is aeriferous. The tildie is unsuasible. If the tildie immure the leeanne then the leeanne immure the tildie. If something immure the leeanne then the leeanne smite the tildie. If something is aeriferous then it immure the leeanne. If something is unsuasible then it confect the leeanne. If something smite the tildie then the tildie smite the leeanne. If something is unreserved and it smite the leeanne then the leeanne is aeriferous. The tildie does not like the leeanne.", "logic": "\nUnreserved(leeanne)\nAeriferous(leeanne)\nUnsuasible(tildie)\nImmure(tildie, leeanne) -> Immure(leeanne, tildie)\nforall x (Immure(x, leeanne) -> Smite(leeanne, tildie))\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) -> Immure(x, leeanne))\nforall x (Unsuasible(x) -> Confect(x, leeanne))\nforall x (Smite(x, tildie) -> Smite(tildie, leeanne))\nforall x (Unreserved(x) and Smite(x, leeanne) -> Aeriferous(leeanne))\n\nnot Immure(tildie, leeanne)\n\nforall x (Aeriferous(x) -> Immure(x, leeanne)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The donovan is fattened. The donovan is managerial. The prasun is infinite. If the prasun scull the donovan then the donovan scull the prasun. If something scull the donovan then the donovan hobble the prasun. If something is managerial then it scull the donovan. If something is infinite then it sideline the donovan. If something hobble the prasun then the prasun hobble the donovan. If something is fattened and it hobble the donovan then the donovan is managerial. The prasun sideline the prasun.", "logic": "\nFattened(donovan)\nManagerial(donovan)\nInfinite(prasun)\nScull(prasun, donovan) -> Scull(donovan, prasun)\nforall x (Scull(x, donovan) -> Hobble(donovan, prasun))\nforall x (Managerial(x) -> Scull(x, donovan))\nforall x (Infinite(x) -> Sideline(x, donovan))\nforall x (Hobble(x, prasun) -> Hobble(prasun, donovan))\nforall x (Fattened(x) and Hobble(x, donovan) -> Managerial(donovan))\n\nSideline(prasun, prasun)\n\nSideline(prasun, prasun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The ileana is leftover. The ileana is spumy. The melba is immunised. If the melba garter the ileana then the ileana garter the melba. If something garter the ileana then the ileana assume the melba. If something is spumy then it garter the ileana. If something is immunised then it adulterate the ileana. If something assume the melba then the melba assume the ileana. If something is leftover and it assume the ileana then the ileana is spumy. The melba does not like the melba.", "logic": "\nLeftover(ileana)\nSpumy(ileana)\nImmunised(melba)\nGarter(melba, ileana) -> Garter(ileana, melba)\nforall x (Garter(x, ileana) -> Assume(ileana, melba))\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> Garter(x, ileana))\nforall x (Immunised(x) -> Adulterate(x, ileana))\nforall x (Assume(x, melba) -> Assume(melba, ileana))\nforall x (Leftover(x) and Assume(x, ileana) -> Spumy(ileana))\n\nnot Garter(melba, melba)\n\nnot Garter(melba, melba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The netta is unreal. The netta is semidark. The marylinda is textile. If the marylinda yowl the netta then the netta yowl the marylinda. If something yowl the netta then the netta factor the marylinda. If something is semidark then it yowl the netta. If something is textile then it kidnap the netta. If something factor the marylinda then the marylinda factor the netta. If something is unreal and it factor the netta then the netta is semidark. The netta is green.", "logic": "\nUnreal(netta)\nSemidark(netta)\nTextile(marylinda)\nYowl(marylinda, netta) -> Yowl(netta, marylinda)\nforall x (Yowl(x, netta) -> Factor(netta, marylinda))\nforall x (Semidark(x) -> Yowl(x, netta))\nforall x (Textile(x) -> Kidnap(x, netta))\nforall x (Factor(x, marylinda) -> Factor(marylinda, netta))\nforall x (Unreal(x) and Factor(x, netta) -> Semidark(netta))\n\nGreen(netta)\n\nGreen(netta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The amabel is keeled. The amabel is sophomore. The misty is provable. If the misty haze the amabel then the amabel haze the misty. If something haze the amabel then the amabel exposit the misty. If something is sophomore then it haze the amabel. If something is provable then it rename the amabel. If something exposit the misty then the misty exposit the amabel. If something is keeled and it exposit the amabel then the amabel is sophomore. The misty does not visit the misty.", "logic": "\nKeeled(amabel)\nSophomore(amabel)\nProvable(misty)\nHaze(misty, amabel) -> Haze(amabel, misty)\nforall x (Haze(x, amabel) -> Exposit(amabel, misty))\nforall x (Sophomore(x) -> Haze(x, amabel))\nforall x (Provable(x) -> Rename(x, amabel))\nforall x (Exposit(x, misty) -> Exposit(misty, amabel))\nforall x (Keeled(x) and Exposit(x, amabel) -> Sophomore(amabel))\n\nnot Exposit(misty, misty)\n\nnot Exposit(misty, misty) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "The bernard is renewing. The bernard is focal. The aldric is concealed. If the aldric gloat the bernard then the bernard gloat the aldric. If something gloat the bernard then the bernard spark the aldric. If something is focal then it gloat the bernard. If something is concealed then it abort the bernard. If something spark the aldric then the aldric spark the bernard. If something is renewing and it spark the bernard then the bernard is focal. The bernard is concealed.", "logic": "\nRenewing(bernard)\nFocal(bernard)\nConcealed(aldric)\nGloat(aldric, bernard) -> Gloat(bernard, aldric)\nforall x (Gloat(x, bernard) -> Spark(bernard, aldric))\nforall x (Focal(x) -> Gloat(x, bernard))\nforall x (Concealed(x) -> Abort(x, bernard))\nforall x (Spark(x, aldric) -> Spark(aldric, bernard))\nforall x (Renewing(x) and Spark(x, bernard) -> Focal(bernard))\n\nConcealed(bernard)\n\nConcealed(bernard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1168"} {"premises": "Chantal is ascensive. Hall is crafty. Hall is repeated. If something is fourhanded then it is ascensive. All prevenient things are repeated. Hall is repeated.", "logic": "\nAscensive(chantal)\nCrafty(hall)\nRepeated(hall)\nforall x (Fourhanded(x) -> Ascensive(x))\nforall x (Prevenient(x) -> Repeated(x))\n\nRepeated(hall)\n\ntherefore Repeated(hall)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-702"} {"premises": "Philis is pectic. Dorree is multiplied. Dorree is indirect. If something is thermoset then it is pectic. All ungual things are indirect. Dorree is not multiplied.", "logic": "\nPectic(philis)\nMultiplied(dorree)\nIndirect(dorree)\nforall x (Thermoset(x) -> Pectic(x))\nforall x (Ungual(x) -> Indirect(x))\n\nnot Multiplied(dorree)\n\ntherefore Multiplied(dorree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-702"} {"premises": "Maison is colorful. Priscilla is lxxvi. Priscilla is brainish. If something is tempered then it is colorful. All alary things are brainish. Maison is not brainish.", "logic": "\nColorful(maison)\nLxxvi(priscilla)\nBrainish(priscilla)\nforall x (Tempered(x) -> Colorful(x))\nforall x (Alary(x) -> Brainish(x))\n\nnot Brainish(maison)\n\nforall x (Alary(x) -> Brainish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-702"} {"premises": "Devi is sintered. Churchill is calcuttan. Churchill is classic. If something is confirmed then it is sintered. All ionic things are classic. Churchill is round.", "logic": "\nSintered(devi)\nCalcuttan(churchill)\nClassic(churchill)\nforall x (Confirmed(x) -> Sintered(x))\nforall x (Ionic(x) -> Classic(x))\n\nRound(churchill)\n\nRound(churchill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-702"} {"premises": "The lee is supportive. The lee is redeemed. The lee does not need the guinevere. The jessica swatter the guinevere. The jessica is bimetal. The guinevere swatter the lee. The guinevere is supportive. The guinevere motor the lee. The guinevere motor the laurice. The guinevere empty the lee. The laurice swatter the jessica. The laurice is outbound. The laurice is bellyless. The laurice is redeemed. The laurice does not need the jessica. If someone swatter the guinevere and the guinevere empty the jessica then the jessica swatter the lee. If the laurice is supportive then the laurice does not eat the guinevere. If someone motor the jessica and they are bellyless then the jessica empty the laurice. If the jessica swatter the guinevere and the jessica does not visit the lee then the guinevere does not need the lee. If someone swatter the lee then they visit the jessica. If someone motor the guinevere then the guinevere is redeemed. If someone swatter the guinevere and the guinevere motor the laurice then the laurice does not eat the lee. If someone swatter the laurice and the laurice is redeemed then the laurice swatter the lee. The guinevere swatter the lee.", "logic": "\nSupportive(lee)\nRedeemed(lee)\nnot Motor(lee, guinevere)\nSwatter(jessica, guinevere)\nBimetal(jessica)\nSwatter(guinevere, lee)\nSupportive(guinevere)\nMotor(guinevere, lee)\nMotor(guinevere, laurice)\nEmpty(guinevere, lee)\nSwatter(laurice, jessica)\nOutbound(laurice)\nBellyless(laurice)\nRedeemed(laurice)\nnot Motor(laurice, jessica)\nforall x (Swatter(x, guinevere) and Empty(guinevere, jessica) -> Swatter(jessica, lee))\nSupportive(laurice) -> not Swatter(laurice, guinevere)\nforall x (Motor(x, jessica) and Bellyless(x) -> Empty(jessica, laurice))\nSwatter(jessica, guinevere) and not Empty(jessica, lee) -> not Motor(guinevere, lee)\nforall x (Swatter(x, lee) -> Empty(x, jessica))\nforall x (Motor(x, guinevere) -> Redeemed(guinevere))\nforall x (Swatter(x, guinevere) and Motor(guinevere, laurice) -> not Swatter(laurice, lee))\nforall x (Swatter(x, laurice) and Redeemed(laurice) -> Swatter(laurice, lee))\n\nSwatter(guinevere, lee)\n\ntherefore Swatter(guinevere, lee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The alice is accretive. The alice is hominal. The alice does not need the umeko. The jonathon vitaminise the umeko. The jonathon is spunky. The umeko vitaminise the alice. The umeko is accretive. The umeko section the alice. The umeko section the luella. The umeko garment the alice. The luella vitaminise the jonathon. The luella is perfervid. The luella is empowered. The luella is hominal. The luella does not need the jonathon. If someone vitaminise the umeko and the umeko garment the jonathon then the jonathon vitaminise the alice. If the luella is accretive then the luella does not eat the umeko. If someone section the jonathon and they are empowered then the jonathon garment the luella. If the jonathon vitaminise the umeko and the jonathon does not visit the alice then the umeko does not need the alice. If someone vitaminise the alice then they visit the jonathon. If someone section the umeko then the umeko is hominal. If someone vitaminise the umeko and the umeko section the luella then the luella does not eat the alice. If someone vitaminise the luella and the luella is hominal then the luella vitaminise the alice. The alice is not accretive.", "logic": "\nAccretive(alice)\nHominal(alice)\nnot Section(alice, umeko)\nVitaminise(jonathon, umeko)\nSpunky(jonathon)\nVitaminise(umeko, alice)\nAccretive(umeko)\nSection(umeko, alice)\nSection(umeko, luella)\nGarment(umeko, alice)\nVitaminise(luella, jonathon)\nPerfervid(luella)\nEmpowered(luella)\nHominal(luella)\nnot Section(luella, jonathon)\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, umeko) and Garment(umeko, jonathon) -> Vitaminise(jonathon, alice))\nAccretive(luella) -> not Vitaminise(luella, umeko)\nforall x (Section(x, jonathon) and Empowered(x) -> Garment(jonathon, luella))\nVitaminise(jonathon, umeko) and not Garment(jonathon, alice) -> not Section(umeko, alice)\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, alice) -> Garment(x, jonathon))\nforall x (Section(x, umeko) -> Hominal(umeko))\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, umeko) and Section(umeko, luella) -> not Vitaminise(luella, alice))\nforall x (Vitaminise(x, luella) and Hominal(luella) -> Vitaminise(luella, alice))\n\nnot Accretive(alice)\n\ntherefore Accretive(alice)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The tatiania is balmy. The tatiania is incurable. The tatiania does not need the elyse. The braden quickstep the elyse. The braden is acuminate. The elyse quickstep the tatiania. The elyse is balmy. The elyse immunize the tatiania. The elyse immunize the olivie. The elyse vulgarise the tatiania. The olivie quickstep the braden. The olivie is peltate. The olivie is toroidal. The olivie is incurable. The olivie does not need the braden. If someone quickstep the elyse and the elyse vulgarise the braden then the braden quickstep the tatiania. If the olivie is balmy then the olivie does not eat the elyse. If someone immunize the braden and they are toroidal then the braden vulgarise the olivie. If the braden quickstep the elyse and the braden does not visit the tatiania then the elyse does not need the tatiania. If someone quickstep the tatiania then they visit the braden. If someone immunize the elyse then the elyse is incurable. If someone quickstep the elyse and the elyse immunize the olivie then the olivie does not eat the tatiania. If someone quickstep the olivie and the olivie is incurable then the olivie quickstep the tatiania. The elyse vulgarise the braden.", "logic": "\nBalmy(tatiania)\nIncurable(tatiania)\nnot Immunize(tatiania, elyse)\nQuickstep(braden, elyse)\nAcuminate(braden)\nQuickstep(elyse, tatiania)\nBalmy(elyse)\nImmunize(elyse, tatiania)\nImmunize(elyse, olivie)\nVulgarise(elyse, tatiania)\nQuickstep(olivie, braden)\nPeltate(olivie)\nToroidal(olivie)\nIncurable(olivie)\nnot Immunize(olivie, braden)\nforall x (Quickstep(x, elyse) and Vulgarise(elyse, braden) -> Quickstep(braden, tatiania))\nBalmy(olivie) -> not Quickstep(olivie, elyse)\nforall x (Immunize(x, braden) and Toroidal(x) -> Vulgarise(braden, olivie))\nQuickstep(braden, elyse) and not Vulgarise(braden, tatiania) -> not Immunize(elyse, tatiania)\nforall x (Quickstep(x, tatiania) -> Vulgarise(x, braden))\nforall x (Immunize(x, elyse) -> Incurable(elyse))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, elyse) and Immunize(elyse, olivie) -> not Quickstep(olivie, tatiania))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, olivie) and Incurable(olivie) -> Quickstep(olivie, tatiania))\n\nVulgarise(elyse, braden)\n\nQuickstep(elyse, tatiania) and forall x (Quickstep(x, tatiania) -> Vulgarise(x, braden)) -> therefore Vulgarise(elyse, braden)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The cora is superhuman. The cora is zoic. The cora does not need the shepperd. The kermie radiate the shepperd. The kermie is mesmerized. The shepperd radiate the cora. The shepperd is superhuman. The shepperd picket the cora. The shepperd picket the ismail. The shepperd glom the cora. The ismail radiate the kermie. The ismail is upended. The ismail is sanctified. The ismail is zoic. The ismail does not need the kermie. If someone radiate the shepperd and the shepperd glom the kermie then the kermie radiate the cora. If the ismail is superhuman then the ismail does not eat the shepperd. If someone picket the kermie and they are sanctified then the kermie glom the ismail. If the kermie radiate the shepperd and the kermie does not visit the cora then the shepperd does not need the cora. If someone radiate the cora then they visit the kermie. If someone picket the shepperd then the shepperd is zoic. If someone radiate the shepperd and the shepperd picket the ismail then the ismail does not eat the cora. If someone radiate the ismail and the ismail is zoic then the ismail radiate the cora. The shepperd does not visit the kermie.", "logic": "\nSuperhuman(cora)\nZoic(cora)\nnot Picket(cora, shepperd)\nRadiate(kermie, shepperd)\nMesmerized(kermie)\nRadiate(shepperd, cora)\nSuperhuman(shepperd)\nPicket(shepperd, cora)\nPicket(shepperd, ismail)\nGlom(shepperd, cora)\nRadiate(ismail, kermie)\nUpended(ismail)\nSanctified(ismail)\nZoic(ismail)\nnot Picket(ismail, kermie)\nforall x (Radiate(x, shepperd) and Glom(shepperd, kermie) -> Radiate(kermie, cora))\nSuperhuman(ismail) -> not Radiate(ismail, shepperd)\nforall x (Picket(x, kermie) and Sanctified(x) -> Glom(kermie, ismail))\nRadiate(kermie, shepperd) and not Glom(kermie, cora) -> not Picket(shepperd, cora)\nforall x (Radiate(x, cora) -> Glom(x, kermie))\nforall x (Picket(x, shepperd) -> Zoic(shepperd))\nforall x (Radiate(x, shepperd) and Picket(shepperd, ismail) -> not Radiate(ismail, cora))\nforall x (Radiate(x, ismail) and Zoic(ismail) -> Radiate(ismail, cora))\n\nnot Glom(shepperd, kermie)\n\nRadiate(shepperd, cora) and forall x (Radiate(x, cora) -> Glom(x, kermie)) -> therefore Glom(shepperd, kermie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The corny is insurgent. The corny is lifesize. The corny does not need the nanci. The goober waken the nanci. The goober is intact. The nanci waken the corny. The nanci is insurgent. The nanci finalise the corny. The nanci finalise the merril. The nanci maroon the corny. The merril waken the goober. The merril is thankful. The merril is deniable. The merril is lifesize. The merril does not need the goober. If someone waken the nanci and the nanci maroon the goober then the goober waken the corny. If the merril is insurgent then the merril does not eat the nanci. If someone finalise the goober and they are deniable then the goober maroon the merril. If the goober waken the nanci and the goober does not visit the corny then the nanci does not need the corny. If someone waken the corny then they visit the goober. If someone finalise the nanci then the nanci is lifesize. If someone waken the nanci and the nanci finalise the merril then the merril does not eat the corny. If someone waken the merril and the merril is lifesize then the merril waken the corny. The goober waken the corny.", "logic": "\nInsurgent(corny)\nLifesize(corny)\nnot Finalise(corny, nanci)\nWaken(goober, nanci)\nIntact(goober)\nWaken(nanci, corny)\nInsurgent(nanci)\nFinalise(nanci, corny)\nFinalise(nanci, merril)\nMaroon(nanci, corny)\nWaken(merril, goober)\nThankful(merril)\nDeniable(merril)\nLifesize(merril)\nnot Finalise(merril, goober)\nforall x (Waken(x, nanci) and Maroon(nanci, goober) -> Waken(goober, corny))\nInsurgent(merril) -> not Waken(merril, nanci)\nforall x (Finalise(x, goober) and Deniable(x) -> Maroon(goober, merril))\nWaken(goober, nanci) and not Maroon(goober, corny) -> not Finalise(nanci, corny)\nforall x (Waken(x, corny) -> Maroon(x, goober))\nforall x (Finalise(x, nanci) -> Lifesize(nanci))\nforall x (Waken(x, nanci) and Finalise(nanci, merril) -> not Waken(merril, corny))\nforall x (Waken(x, merril) and Lifesize(merril) -> Waken(merril, corny))\n\nWaken(goober, corny)\n\nWaken(nanci, corny) and forall x (Waken(x, corny) -> Maroon(x, goober)) -> therefore Maroon(nanci, goober) Waken(goober, nanci) and Maroon(nanci, goober) and forall x (Waken(x, nanci) and Maroon(nanci, goober) -> Waken(goober, corny)) -> therefore Waken(goober, corny)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The rosalia is tortious. The rosalia is countless. The rosalia does not need the langston. The meridel pink the langston. The meridel is sparkling. The langston pink the rosalia. The langston is tortious. The langston recede the rosalia. The langston recede the flossi. The langston worst the rosalia. The flossi pink the meridel. The flossi is regal. The flossi is ocher. The flossi is countless. The flossi does not need the meridel. If someone pink the langston and the langston worst the meridel then the meridel pink the rosalia. If the flossi is tortious then the flossi does not eat the langston. If someone recede the meridel and they are ocher then the meridel worst the flossi. If the meridel pink the langston and the meridel does not visit the rosalia then the langston does not need the rosalia. If someone pink the rosalia then they visit the meridel. If someone recede the langston then the langston is countless. If someone pink the langston and the langston recede the flossi then the flossi does not eat the rosalia. If someone pink the flossi and the flossi is countless then the flossi pink the rosalia. The meridel does not eat the rosalia.", "logic": "\nTortious(rosalia)\nCountless(rosalia)\nnot Recede(rosalia, langston)\nPink(meridel, langston)\nSparkling(meridel)\nPink(langston, rosalia)\nTortious(langston)\nRecede(langston, rosalia)\nRecede(langston, flossi)\nWorst(langston, rosalia)\nPink(flossi, meridel)\nRegal(flossi)\nOcher(flossi)\nCountless(flossi)\nnot Recede(flossi, meridel)\nforall x (Pink(x, langston) and Worst(langston, meridel) -> Pink(meridel, rosalia))\nTortious(flossi) -> not Pink(flossi, langston)\nforall x (Recede(x, meridel) and Ocher(x) -> Worst(meridel, flossi))\nPink(meridel, langston) and not Worst(meridel, rosalia) -> not Recede(langston, rosalia)\nforall x (Pink(x, rosalia) -> Worst(x, meridel))\nforall x (Recede(x, langston) -> Countless(langston))\nforall x (Pink(x, langston) and Recede(langston, flossi) -> not Pink(flossi, rosalia))\nforall x (Pink(x, flossi) and Countless(flossi) -> Pink(flossi, rosalia))\n\nnot Pink(meridel, rosalia)\n\nPink(langston, rosalia) and forall x (Pink(x, rosalia) -> Worst(x, meridel)) -> therefore Worst(langston, meridel) Pink(meridel, langston) and Worst(langston, meridel) and forall x (Pink(x, langston) and Worst(langston, meridel) -> Pink(meridel, rosalia)) -> therefore Pink(meridel, rosalia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The penn is meditative. The penn is prim. The penn does not need the nelson. The lana desalt the nelson. The lana is undulate. The nelson desalt the penn. The nelson is meditative. The nelson menace the penn. The nelson menace the leanne. The nelson prostitute the penn. The leanne desalt the lana. The leanne is inborn. The leanne is mordacious. The leanne is prim. The leanne does not need the lana. If someone desalt the nelson and the nelson prostitute the lana then the lana desalt the penn. If the leanne is meditative then the leanne does not eat the nelson. If someone menace the lana and they are mordacious then the lana prostitute the leanne. If the lana desalt the nelson and the lana does not visit the penn then the nelson does not need the penn. If someone desalt the penn then they visit the lana. If someone menace the nelson then the nelson is prim. If someone desalt the nelson and the nelson menace the leanne then the leanne does not eat the penn. If someone desalt the leanne and the leanne is prim then the leanne desalt the penn. The lana prostitute the lana.", "logic": "\nMeditative(penn)\nPrim(penn)\nnot Menace(penn, nelson)\nDesalt(lana, nelson)\nUndulate(lana)\nDesalt(nelson, penn)\nMeditative(nelson)\nMenace(nelson, penn)\nMenace(nelson, leanne)\nProstitute(nelson, penn)\nDesalt(leanne, lana)\nInborn(leanne)\nMordacious(leanne)\nPrim(leanne)\nnot Menace(leanne, lana)\nforall x (Desalt(x, nelson) and Prostitute(nelson, lana) -> Desalt(lana, penn))\nMeditative(leanne) -> not Desalt(leanne, nelson)\nforall x (Menace(x, lana) and Mordacious(x) -> Prostitute(lana, leanne))\nDesalt(lana, nelson) and not Prostitute(lana, penn) -> not Menace(nelson, penn)\nforall x (Desalt(x, penn) -> Prostitute(x, lana))\nforall x (Menace(x, nelson) -> Prim(nelson))\nforall x (Desalt(x, nelson) and Menace(nelson, leanne) -> not Desalt(leanne, penn))\nforall x (Desalt(x, leanne) and Prim(leanne) -> Desalt(leanne, penn))\n\nProstitute(lana, lana)\n\nDesalt(nelson, penn) and forall x (Desalt(x, penn) -> Prostitute(x, lana)) -> therefore Prostitute(nelson, lana) Desalt(lana, nelson) and Prostitute(nelson, lana) and forall x (Desalt(x, nelson) and Prostitute(nelson, lana) -> Desalt(lana, penn)) -> therefore Desalt(lana, penn) Desalt(lana, penn) and forall x (Desalt(x, penn) -> Prostitute(x, lana)) -> therefore Prostitute(lana, lana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The liam is woebegone. The liam is bowery. The liam does not need the buster. The sarge scold the buster. The sarge is contrasty. The buster scold the liam. The buster is woebegone. The buster resurrect the liam. The buster resurrect the jules. The buster groak the liam. The jules scold the sarge. The jules is mucoid. The jules is acrogenous. The jules is bowery. The jules does not need the sarge. If someone scold the buster and the buster groak the sarge then the sarge scold the liam. If the jules is woebegone then the jules does not eat the buster. If someone resurrect the sarge and they are acrogenous then the sarge groak the jules. If the sarge scold the buster and the sarge does not visit the liam then the buster does not need the liam. If someone scold the liam then they visit the sarge. If someone resurrect the buster then the buster is bowery. If someone scold the buster and the buster resurrect the jules then the jules does not eat the liam. If someone scold the jules and the jules is bowery then the jules scold the liam. The sarge does not visit the sarge.", "logic": "\nWoebegone(liam)\nBowery(liam)\nnot Resurrect(liam, buster)\nScold(sarge, buster)\nContrasty(sarge)\nScold(buster, liam)\nWoebegone(buster)\nResurrect(buster, liam)\nResurrect(buster, jules)\nGroak(buster, liam)\nScold(jules, sarge)\nMucoid(jules)\nAcrogenous(jules)\nBowery(jules)\nnot Resurrect(jules, sarge)\nforall x (Scold(x, buster) and Groak(buster, sarge) -> Scold(sarge, liam))\nWoebegone(jules) -> not Scold(jules, buster)\nforall x (Resurrect(x, sarge) and Acrogenous(x) -> Groak(sarge, jules))\nScold(sarge, buster) and not Groak(sarge, liam) -> not Resurrect(buster, liam)\nforall x (Scold(x, liam) -> Groak(x, sarge))\nforall x (Resurrect(x, buster) -> Bowery(buster))\nforall x (Scold(x, buster) and Resurrect(buster, jules) -> not Scold(jules, liam))\nforall x (Scold(x, jules) and Bowery(jules) -> Scold(jules, liam))\n\nnot Groak(sarge, sarge)\n\nScold(buster, liam) and forall x (Scold(x, liam) -> Groak(x, sarge)) -> therefore Groak(buster, sarge) Scold(sarge, buster) and Groak(buster, sarge) and forall x (Scold(x, buster) and Groak(buster, sarge) -> Scold(sarge, liam)) -> therefore Scold(sarge, liam) Scold(sarge, liam) and forall x (Scold(x, liam) -> Groak(x, sarge)) -> therefore Groak(sarge, sarge)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The lucio is rubber. The lucio is civilian. The lucio does not need the belvia. The selby paraphrase the belvia. The selby is diluvian. The belvia paraphrase the lucio. The belvia is rubber. The belvia illegalise the lucio. The belvia illegalise the darb. The belvia apperceive the lucio. The darb paraphrase the selby. The darb is anuran. The darb is valueless. The darb is civilian. The darb does not need the selby. If someone paraphrase the belvia and the belvia apperceive the selby then the selby paraphrase the lucio. If the darb is rubber then the darb does not eat the belvia. If someone illegalise the selby and they are valueless then the selby apperceive the darb. If the selby paraphrase the belvia and the selby does not visit the lucio then the belvia does not need the lucio. If someone paraphrase the lucio then they visit the selby. If someone illegalise the belvia then the belvia is civilian. If someone paraphrase the belvia and the belvia illegalise the darb then the darb does not eat the lucio. If someone paraphrase the darb and the darb is civilian then the darb paraphrase the lucio. The belvia is not civilian.", "logic": "\nRubber(lucio)\nCivilian(lucio)\nnot Illegalise(lucio, belvia)\nParaphrase(selby, belvia)\nDiluvian(selby)\nParaphrase(belvia, lucio)\nRubber(belvia)\nIllegalise(belvia, lucio)\nIllegalise(belvia, darb)\nApperceive(belvia, lucio)\nParaphrase(darb, selby)\nAnuran(darb)\nValueless(darb)\nCivilian(darb)\nnot Illegalise(darb, selby)\nforall x (Paraphrase(x, belvia) and Apperceive(belvia, selby) -> Paraphrase(selby, lucio))\nRubber(darb) -> not Paraphrase(darb, belvia)\nforall x (Illegalise(x, selby) and Valueless(x) -> Apperceive(selby, darb))\nParaphrase(selby, belvia) and not Apperceive(selby, lucio) -> not Illegalise(belvia, lucio)\nforall x (Paraphrase(x, lucio) -> Apperceive(x, selby))\nforall x (Illegalise(x, belvia) -> Civilian(belvia))\nforall x (Paraphrase(x, belvia) and Illegalise(belvia, darb) -> not Paraphrase(darb, lucio))\nforall x (Paraphrase(x, darb) and Civilian(darb) -> Paraphrase(darb, lucio))\n\nnot Civilian(belvia)\n\nforall x (Illegalise(x, belvia) -> Civilian(belvia)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The magdalene is thriving. The magdalene is palatial. The magdalene does not need the lori. The waine mitigate the lori. The waine is former. The lori mitigate the magdalene. The lori is thriving. The lori handcuff the magdalene. The lori handcuff the berthe. The lori recode the magdalene. The berthe mitigate the waine. The berthe is stunning. The berthe is unrevealed. The berthe is palatial. The berthe does not need the waine. If someone mitigate the lori and the lori recode the waine then the waine mitigate the magdalene. If the berthe is thriving then the berthe does not eat the lori. If someone handcuff the waine and they are unrevealed then the waine recode the berthe. If the waine mitigate the lori and the waine does not visit the magdalene then the lori does not need the magdalene. If someone mitigate the magdalene then they visit the waine. If someone handcuff the lori then the lori is palatial. If someone mitigate the lori and the lori handcuff the berthe then the berthe does not eat the magdalene. If someone mitigate the berthe and the berthe is palatial then the berthe mitigate the magdalene. The berthe recode the waine.", "logic": "\nThriving(magdalene)\nPalatial(magdalene)\nnot Handcuff(magdalene, lori)\nMitigate(waine, lori)\nFormer(waine)\nMitigate(lori, magdalene)\nThriving(lori)\nHandcuff(lori, magdalene)\nHandcuff(lori, berthe)\nRecode(lori, magdalene)\nMitigate(berthe, waine)\nStunning(berthe)\nUnrevealed(berthe)\nPalatial(berthe)\nnot Handcuff(berthe, waine)\nforall x (Mitigate(x, lori) and Recode(lori, waine) -> Mitigate(waine, magdalene))\nThriving(berthe) -> not Mitigate(berthe, lori)\nforall x (Handcuff(x, waine) and Unrevealed(x) -> Recode(waine, berthe))\nMitigate(waine, lori) and not Recode(waine, magdalene) -> not Handcuff(lori, magdalene)\nforall x (Mitigate(x, magdalene) -> Recode(x, waine))\nforall x (Handcuff(x, lori) -> Palatial(lori))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, lori) and Handcuff(lori, berthe) -> not Mitigate(berthe, magdalene))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, berthe) and Palatial(berthe) -> Mitigate(berthe, magdalene))\n\nRecode(berthe, waine)\n\nforall x (Mitigate(x, magdalene) -> Recode(x, waine)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The arnold is flighty. The arnold is peaceful. The arnold does not need the danice. The hedda sterilize the danice. The hedda is scattered. The danice sterilize the arnold. The danice is flighty. The danice trifurcate the arnold. The danice trifurcate the howard. The danice float the arnold. The howard sterilize the hedda. The howard is forgotten. The howard is araneidan. The howard is peaceful. The howard does not need the hedda. If someone sterilize the danice and the danice float the hedda then the hedda sterilize the arnold. If the howard is flighty then the howard does not eat the danice. If someone trifurcate the hedda and they are araneidan then the hedda float the howard. If the hedda sterilize the danice and the hedda does not visit the arnold then the danice does not need the arnold. If someone sterilize the arnold then they visit the hedda. If someone trifurcate the danice then the danice is peaceful. If someone sterilize the danice and the danice trifurcate the howard then the howard does not eat the arnold. If someone sterilize the howard and the howard is peaceful then the howard sterilize the arnold. The hedda does not visit the howard.", "logic": "\nFlighty(arnold)\nPeaceful(arnold)\nnot Trifurcate(arnold, danice)\nSterilize(hedda, danice)\nScattered(hedda)\nSterilize(danice, arnold)\nFlighty(danice)\nTrifurcate(danice, arnold)\nTrifurcate(danice, howard)\nFloat(danice, arnold)\nSterilize(howard, hedda)\nForgotten(howard)\nAraneidan(howard)\nPeaceful(howard)\nnot Trifurcate(howard, hedda)\nforall x (Sterilize(x, danice) and Float(danice, hedda) -> Sterilize(hedda, arnold))\nFlighty(howard) -> not Sterilize(howard, danice)\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, hedda) and Araneidan(x) -> Float(hedda, howard))\nSterilize(hedda, danice) and not Float(hedda, arnold) -> not Trifurcate(danice, arnold)\nforall x (Sterilize(x, arnold) -> Float(x, hedda))\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, danice) -> Peaceful(danice))\nforall x (Sterilize(x, danice) and Trifurcate(danice, howard) -> not Sterilize(howard, arnold))\nforall x (Sterilize(x, howard) and Peaceful(howard) -> Sterilize(howard, arnold))\n\nnot Float(hedda, howard)\n\nforall x (Trifurcate(x, hedda) and Araneidan(x) -> Float(hedda, howard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The jan is bantu. The jan is enjoyable. The jan does not need the glynda. The winthrop miff the glynda. The winthrop is unsporting. The glynda miff the jan. The glynda is bantu. The glynda urticate the jan. The glynda urticate the deirdre. The glynda swaddle the jan. The deirdre miff the winthrop. The deirdre is shining. The deirdre is jumbo. The deirdre is enjoyable. The deirdre does not need the winthrop. If someone miff the glynda and the glynda swaddle the winthrop then the winthrop miff the jan. If the deirdre is bantu then the deirdre does not eat the glynda. If someone urticate the winthrop and they are jumbo then the winthrop swaddle the deirdre. If the winthrop miff the glynda and the winthrop does not visit the jan then the glynda does not need the jan. If someone miff the jan then they visit the winthrop. If someone urticate the glynda then the glynda is enjoyable. If someone miff the glynda and the glynda urticate the deirdre then the deirdre does not eat the jan. If someone miff the deirdre and the deirdre is enjoyable then the deirdre miff the jan. The jan swaddle the winthrop.", "logic": "\nBantu(jan)\nEnjoyable(jan)\nnot Urticate(jan, glynda)\nMiff(winthrop, glynda)\nUnsporting(winthrop)\nMiff(glynda, jan)\nBantu(glynda)\nUrticate(glynda, jan)\nUrticate(glynda, deirdre)\nSwaddle(glynda, jan)\nMiff(deirdre, winthrop)\nShining(deirdre)\nJumbo(deirdre)\nEnjoyable(deirdre)\nnot Urticate(deirdre, winthrop)\nforall x (Miff(x, glynda) and Swaddle(glynda, winthrop) -> Miff(winthrop, jan))\nBantu(deirdre) -> not Miff(deirdre, glynda)\nforall x (Urticate(x, winthrop) and Jumbo(x) -> Swaddle(winthrop, deirdre))\nMiff(winthrop, glynda) and not Swaddle(winthrop, jan) -> not Urticate(glynda, jan)\nforall x (Miff(x, jan) -> Swaddle(x, winthrop))\nforall x (Urticate(x, glynda) -> Enjoyable(glynda))\nforall x (Miff(x, glynda) and Urticate(glynda, deirdre) -> not Miff(deirdre, jan))\nforall x (Miff(x, deirdre) and Enjoyable(deirdre) -> Miff(deirdre, jan))\n\nSwaddle(jan, winthrop)\n\nforall x (Miff(x, jan) -> Swaddle(x, winthrop)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The ava is spick. The ava is oral. The ava does not need the roobbie. The lurette scuff the roobbie. The lurette is antinomian. The roobbie scuff the ava. The roobbie is spick. The roobbie baulk the ava. The roobbie baulk the micheline. The roobbie bargain the ava. The micheline scuff the lurette. The micheline is orange. The micheline is warm. The micheline is oral. The micheline does not need the lurette. If someone scuff the roobbie and the roobbie bargain the lurette then the lurette scuff the ava. If the micheline is spick then the micheline does not eat the roobbie. If someone baulk the lurette and they are warm then the lurette bargain the micheline. If the lurette scuff the roobbie and the lurette does not visit the ava then the roobbie does not need the ava. If someone scuff the ava then they visit the lurette. If someone baulk the roobbie then the roobbie is oral. If someone scuff the roobbie and the roobbie baulk the micheline then the micheline does not eat the ava. If someone scuff the micheline and the micheline is oral then the micheline scuff the ava. The ava does not eat the micheline.", "logic": "\nSpick(ava)\nOral(ava)\nnot Baulk(ava, roobbie)\nScuff(lurette, roobbie)\nAntinomian(lurette)\nScuff(roobbie, ava)\nSpick(roobbie)\nBaulk(roobbie, ava)\nBaulk(roobbie, micheline)\nBargain(roobbie, ava)\nScuff(micheline, lurette)\nOrange(micheline)\nWarm(micheline)\nOral(micheline)\nnot Baulk(micheline, lurette)\nforall x (Scuff(x, roobbie) and Bargain(roobbie, lurette) -> Scuff(lurette, ava))\nSpick(micheline) -> not Scuff(micheline, roobbie)\nforall x (Baulk(x, lurette) and Warm(x) -> Bargain(lurette, micheline))\nScuff(lurette, roobbie) and not Bargain(lurette, ava) -> not Baulk(roobbie, ava)\nforall x (Scuff(x, ava) -> Bargain(x, lurette))\nforall x (Baulk(x, roobbie) -> Oral(roobbie))\nforall x (Scuff(x, roobbie) and Baulk(roobbie, micheline) -> not Scuff(micheline, ava))\nforall x (Scuff(x, micheline) and Oral(micheline) -> Scuff(micheline, ava))\n\nnot Scuff(ava, micheline)\n\nnot Scuff(ava, micheline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The eimile is vertebrate. The eimile is silver. The eimile does not need the xylia. The tracey enchant the xylia. The tracey is fulgent. The xylia enchant the eimile. The xylia is vertebrate. The xylia monetize the eimile. The xylia monetize the stavros. The xylia detoxify the eimile. The stavros enchant the tracey. The stavros is visualized. The stavros is aeriferous. The stavros is silver. The stavros does not need the tracey. If someone enchant the xylia and the xylia detoxify the tracey then the tracey enchant the eimile. If the stavros is vertebrate then the stavros does not eat the xylia. If someone monetize the tracey and they are aeriferous then the tracey detoxify the stavros. If the tracey enchant the xylia and the tracey does not visit the eimile then the xylia does not need the eimile. If someone enchant the eimile then they visit the tracey. If someone monetize the xylia then the xylia is silver. If someone enchant the xylia and the xylia monetize the stavros then the stavros does not eat the eimile. If someone enchant the stavros and the stavros is silver then the stavros enchant the eimile. The eimile monetize the eimile.", "logic": "\nVertebrate(eimile)\nSilver(eimile)\nnot Monetize(eimile, xylia)\nEnchant(tracey, xylia)\nFulgent(tracey)\nEnchant(xylia, eimile)\nVertebrate(xylia)\nMonetize(xylia, eimile)\nMonetize(xylia, stavros)\nDetoxify(xylia, eimile)\nEnchant(stavros, tracey)\nVisualized(stavros)\nAeriferous(stavros)\nSilver(stavros)\nnot Monetize(stavros, tracey)\nforall x (Enchant(x, xylia) and Detoxify(xylia, tracey) -> Enchant(tracey, eimile))\nVertebrate(stavros) -> not Enchant(stavros, xylia)\nforall x (Monetize(x, tracey) and Aeriferous(x) -> Detoxify(tracey, stavros))\nEnchant(tracey, xylia) and not Detoxify(tracey, eimile) -> not Monetize(xylia, eimile)\nforall x (Enchant(x, eimile) -> Detoxify(x, tracey))\nforall x (Monetize(x, xylia) -> Silver(xylia))\nforall x (Enchant(x, xylia) and Monetize(xylia, stavros) -> not Enchant(stavros, eimile))\nforall x (Enchant(x, stavros) and Silver(stavros) -> Enchant(stavros, eimile))\n\nMonetize(eimile, eimile)\n\nMonetize(eimile, eimile) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The edyth is annelidan. The edyth is jejune. The edyth does not need the hassan. The dulcinea joyride the hassan. The dulcinea is huffish. The hassan joyride the edyth. The hassan is annelidan. The hassan fondle the edyth. The hassan fondle the sibella. The hassan mistake the edyth. The sibella joyride the dulcinea. The sibella is caitiff. The sibella is objective. The sibella is jejune. The sibella does not need the dulcinea. If someone joyride the hassan and the hassan mistake the dulcinea then the dulcinea joyride the edyth. If the sibella is annelidan then the sibella does not eat the hassan. If someone fondle the dulcinea and they are objective then the dulcinea mistake the sibella. If the dulcinea joyride the hassan and the dulcinea does not visit the edyth then the hassan does not need the edyth. If someone joyride the edyth then they visit the dulcinea. If someone fondle the hassan then the hassan is jejune. If someone joyride the hassan and the hassan fondle the sibella then the sibella does not eat the edyth. If someone joyride the sibella and the sibella is jejune then the sibella joyride the edyth. The edyth does not need the sibella.", "logic": "\nAnnelidan(edyth)\nJejune(edyth)\nnot Fondle(edyth, hassan)\nJoyride(dulcinea, hassan)\nHuffish(dulcinea)\nJoyride(hassan, edyth)\nAnnelidan(hassan)\nFondle(hassan, edyth)\nFondle(hassan, sibella)\nMistake(hassan, edyth)\nJoyride(sibella, dulcinea)\nCaitiff(sibella)\nObjective(sibella)\nJejune(sibella)\nnot Fondle(sibella, dulcinea)\nforall x (Joyride(x, hassan) and Mistake(hassan, dulcinea) -> Joyride(dulcinea, edyth))\nAnnelidan(sibella) -> not Joyride(sibella, hassan)\nforall x (Fondle(x, dulcinea) and Objective(x) -> Mistake(dulcinea, sibella))\nJoyride(dulcinea, hassan) and not Mistake(dulcinea, edyth) -> not Fondle(hassan, edyth)\nforall x (Joyride(x, edyth) -> Mistake(x, dulcinea))\nforall x (Fondle(x, hassan) -> Jejune(hassan))\nforall x (Joyride(x, hassan) and Fondle(hassan, sibella) -> not Joyride(sibella, edyth))\nforall x (Joyride(x, sibella) and Jejune(sibella) -> Joyride(sibella, edyth))\n\nnot Fondle(edyth, sibella)\n\nnot Fondle(edyth, sibella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The bengt is unopened. The bengt is unspoilt. The bengt does not need the monique. The quigman farm the monique. The quigman is concordant. The monique farm the bengt. The monique is unopened. The monique entangle the bengt. The monique entangle the norine. The monique snake the bengt. The norine farm the quigman. The norine is downstairs. The norine is toned. The norine is unspoilt. The norine does not need the quigman. If someone farm the monique and the monique snake the quigman then the quigman farm the bengt. If the norine is unopened then the norine does not eat the monique. If someone entangle the quigman and they are toned then the quigman snake the norine. If the quigman farm the monique and the quigman does not visit the bengt then the monique does not need the bengt. If someone farm the bengt then they visit the quigman. If someone entangle the monique then the monique is unspoilt. If someone farm the monique and the monique entangle the norine then the norine does not eat the bengt. If someone farm the norine and the norine is unspoilt then the norine farm the bengt. The norine entangle the bengt.", "logic": "\nUnopened(bengt)\nUnspoilt(bengt)\nnot Entangle(bengt, monique)\nFarm(quigman, monique)\nConcordant(quigman)\nFarm(monique, bengt)\nUnopened(monique)\nEntangle(monique, bengt)\nEntangle(monique, norine)\nSnake(monique, bengt)\nFarm(norine, quigman)\nDownstairs(norine)\nToned(norine)\nUnspoilt(norine)\nnot Entangle(norine, quigman)\nforall x (Farm(x, monique) and Snake(monique, quigman) -> Farm(quigman, bengt))\nUnopened(norine) -> not Farm(norine, monique)\nforall x (Entangle(x, quigman) and Toned(x) -> Snake(quigman, norine))\nFarm(quigman, monique) and not Snake(quigman, bengt) -> not Entangle(monique, bengt)\nforall x (Farm(x, bengt) -> Snake(x, quigman))\nforall x (Entangle(x, monique) -> Unspoilt(monique))\nforall x (Farm(x, monique) and Entangle(monique, norine) -> not Farm(norine, bengt))\nforall x (Farm(x, norine) and Unspoilt(norine) -> Farm(norine, bengt))\n\nEntangle(norine, bengt)\n\nEntangle(norine, bengt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1011"} {"premises": "The berthe is nonionised. The berthe is allegiant. The berthe is godly. The berthe is garish. The berthe cock the clemmy. The clemmy cock the berthe. The sheffy chatter the clemmy. The sheffy is allegiant. The sheffy is garish. The sheffy cock the berthe. If the berthe chatter the clemmy then the berthe chatter the sheffy. If something cock the clemmy then it is godly. If the berthe ebonise the clemmy then the clemmy ebonise the sheffy. If something is delayed and it cock the sheffy then it ebonise the sheffy. If something chatter the berthe then it ebonise the berthe. If something chatter the sheffy then the sheffy ebonise the clemmy. If something chatter the clemmy then it cock the clemmy. If something chatter the berthe and the berthe cock the clemmy then it cock the sheffy. The clemmy cock the berthe.", "logic": "\nNonionised(berthe)\nAllegiant(berthe)\nGodly(berthe)\nGarish(berthe)\nCock(berthe, clemmy)\nCock(clemmy, berthe)\nChatter(sheffy, clemmy)\nAllegiant(sheffy)\nGarish(sheffy)\nCock(sheffy, berthe)\nChatter(berthe, clemmy) -> Chatter(berthe, sheffy)\nforall x (Cock(x, clemmy) -> Godly(x))\nEbonise(berthe, clemmy) -> Ebonise(clemmy, sheffy)\nforall x (Delayed(x) and Cock(x, sheffy) -> Ebonise(x, sheffy))\nforall x (Chatter(x, berthe) -> Ebonise(x, berthe))\nforall x (Chatter(x, sheffy) -> Ebonise(sheffy, clemmy))\nforall x (Chatter(x, clemmy) -> Cock(x, clemmy))\nforall x (Chatter(x, berthe) and Cock(berthe, clemmy) -> Cock(x, sheffy))\n\nCock(clemmy, berthe)\n\ntherefore Cock(clemmy, berthe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The carroll is caller. The carroll is indexless. The carroll is overblown. The carroll is shaggy. The carroll unfrock the rafael. The rafael unfrock the carroll. The cassandre vault the rafael. The cassandre is indexless. The cassandre is shaggy. The cassandre unfrock the carroll. If the carroll vault the rafael then the carroll vault the cassandre. If something unfrock the rafael then it is overblown. If the carroll district the rafael then the rafael district the cassandre. If something is thyroid and it unfrock the cassandre then it district the cassandre. If something vault the carroll then it district the carroll. If something vault the cassandre then the cassandre district the rafael. If something vault the rafael then it unfrock the rafael. If something vault the carroll and the carroll unfrock the rafael then it unfrock the cassandre. The carroll is not shaggy.", "logic": "\nCaller(carroll)\nIndexless(carroll)\nOverblown(carroll)\nShaggy(carroll)\nUnfrock(carroll, rafael)\nUnfrock(rafael, carroll)\nVault(cassandre, rafael)\nIndexless(cassandre)\nShaggy(cassandre)\nUnfrock(cassandre, carroll)\nVault(carroll, rafael) -> Vault(carroll, cassandre)\nforall x (Unfrock(x, rafael) -> Overblown(x))\nDistrict(carroll, rafael) -> District(rafael, cassandre)\nforall x (Thyroid(x) and Unfrock(x, cassandre) -> District(x, cassandre))\nforall x (Vault(x, carroll) -> District(x, carroll))\nforall x (Vault(x, cassandre) -> District(cassandre, rafael))\nforall x (Vault(x, rafael) -> Unfrock(x, rafael))\nforall x (Vault(x, carroll) and Unfrock(carroll, rafael) -> Unfrock(x, cassandre))\n\nnot Shaggy(carroll)\n\ntherefore Shaggy(carroll)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The cooper is analytic. The cooper is mournful. The cooper is archaic. The cooper is subtropic. The cooper befool the beulah. The beulah befool the cooper. The spencer reprehend the beulah. The spencer is mournful. The spencer is subtropic. The spencer befool the cooper. If the cooper reprehend the beulah then the cooper reprehend the spencer. If something befool the beulah then it is archaic. If the cooper grout the beulah then the beulah grout the spencer. If something is glittering and it befool the spencer then it grout the spencer. If something reprehend the cooper then it grout the cooper. If something reprehend the spencer then the spencer grout the beulah. If something reprehend the beulah then it befool the beulah. If something reprehend the cooper and the cooper befool the beulah then it befool the spencer. The spencer befool the beulah.", "logic": "\nAnalytic(cooper)\nMournful(cooper)\nArchaic(cooper)\nSubtropic(cooper)\nBefool(cooper, beulah)\nBefool(beulah, cooper)\nReprehend(spencer, beulah)\nMournful(spencer)\nSubtropic(spencer)\nBefool(spencer, cooper)\nReprehend(cooper, beulah) -> Reprehend(cooper, spencer)\nforall x (Befool(x, beulah) -> Archaic(x))\nGrout(cooper, beulah) -> Grout(beulah, spencer)\nforall x (Glittering(x) and Befool(x, spencer) -> Grout(x, spencer))\nforall x (Reprehend(x, cooper) -> Grout(x, cooper))\nforall x (Reprehend(x, spencer) -> Grout(spencer, beulah))\nforall x (Reprehend(x, beulah) -> Befool(x, beulah))\nforall x (Reprehend(x, cooper) and Befool(cooper, beulah) -> Befool(x, spencer))\n\nBefool(spencer, beulah)\n\nReprehend(spencer, beulah) and forall x (Reprehend(x, beulah) -> Befool(x, beulah)) -> therefore Befool(spencer, beulah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The tucky is valued. The tucky is impure. The tucky is irrational. The tucky is deserted. The tucky prettify the paige. The paige prettify the tucky. The genia salivate the paige. The genia is impure. The genia is deserted. The genia prettify the tucky. If the tucky salivate the paige then the tucky salivate the genia. If something prettify the paige then it is irrational. If the tucky refund the paige then the paige refund the genia. If something is hydric and it prettify the genia then it refund the genia. If something salivate the tucky then it refund the tucky. If something salivate the genia then the genia refund the paige. If something salivate the paige then it prettify the paige. If something salivate the tucky and the tucky prettify the paige then it prettify the genia. The genia does not see the paige.", "logic": "\nValued(tucky)\nImpure(tucky)\nIrrational(tucky)\nDeserted(tucky)\nPrettify(tucky, paige)\nPrettify(paige, tucky)\nSalivate(genia, paige)\nImpure(genia)\nDeserted(genia)\nPrettify(genia, tucky)\nSalivate(tucky, paige) -> Salivate(tucky, genia)\nforall x (Prettify(x, paige) -> Irrational(x))\nRefund(tucky, paige) -> Refund(paige, genia)\nforall x (Hydric(x) and Prettify(x, genia) -> Refund(x, genia))\nforall x (Salivate(x, tucky) -> Refund(x, tucky))\nforall x (Salivate(x, genia) -> Refund(genia, paige))\nforall x (Salivate(x, paige) -> Prettify(x, paige))\nforall x (Salivate(x, tucky) and Prettify(tucky, paige) -> Prettify(x, genia))\n\nnot Prettify(genia, paige)\n\nSalivate(genia, paige) and forall x (Salivate(x, paige) -> Prettify(x, paige)) -> therefore Prettify(genia, paige)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The fredrick is pimpled. The fredrick is enviable. The fredrick is steamed. The fredrick is roughdried. The fredrick disband the chloette. The chloette disband the fredrick. The jeniece castigate the chloette. The jeniece is enviable. The jeniece is roughdried. The jeniece disband the fredrick. If the fredrick castigate the chloette then the fredrick castigate the jeniece. If something disband the chloette then it is steamed. If the fredrick case the chloette then the chloette case the jeniece. If something is offending and it disband the jeniece then it case the jeniece. If something castigate the fredrick then it case the fredrick. If something castigate the jeniece then the jeniece case the chloette. If something castigate the chloette then it disband the chloette. If something castigate the fredrick and the fredrick disband the chloette then it disband the jeniece. The jeniece is steamed.", "logic": "\nPimpled(fredrick)\nEnviable(fredrick)\nSteamed(fredrick)\nRoughdried(fredrick)\nDisband(fredrick, chloette)\nDisband(chloette, fredrick)\nCastigate(jeniece, chloette)\nEnviable(jeniece)\nRoughdried(jeniece)\nDisband(jeniece, fredrick)\nCastigate(fredrick, chloette) -> Castigate(fredrick, jeniece)\nforall x (Disband(x, chloette) -> Steamed(x))\nCase(fredrick, chloette) -> Case(chloette, jeniece)\nforall x (Offending(x) and Disband(x, jeniece) -> Case(x, jeniece))\nforall x (Castigate(x, fredrick) -> Case(x, fredrick))\nforall x (Castigate(x, jeniece) -> Case(jeniece, chloette))\nforall x (Castigate(x, chloette) -> Disband(x, chloette))\nforall x (Castigate(x, fredrick) and Disband(fredrick, chloette) -> Disband(x, jeniece))\n\nSteamed(jeniece)\n\nCastigate(jeniece, chloette) and forall x (Castigate(x, chloette) -> Disband(x, chloette)) -> therefore Disband(jeniece, chloette) Disband(jeniece, chloette) and forall x (Disband(x, chloette) -> Steamed(x)) -> therefore Steamed(jeniece)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The carline is forgiving. The carline is untimbered. The carline is unstarred. The carline is autumnal. The carline transduce the dedie. The dedie transduce the carline. The mala determine the dedie. The mala is untimbered. The mala is autumnal. The mala transduce the carline. If the carline determine the dedie then the carline determine the mala. If something transduce the dedie then it is unstarred. If the carline oblige the dedie then the dedie oblige the mala. If something is sintered and it transduce the mala then it oblige the mala. If something determine the carline then it oblige the carline. If something determine the mala then the mala oblige the dedie. If something determine the dedie then it transduce the dedie. If something determine the carline and the carline transduce the dedie then it transduce the mala. The mala is not unstarred.", "logic": "\nForgiving(carline)\nUntimbered(carline)\nUnstarred(carline)\nAutumnal(carline)\nTransduce(carline, dedie)\nTransduce(dedie, carline)\nDetermine(mala, dedie)\nUntimbered(mala)\nAutumnal(mala)\nTransduce(mala, carline)\nDetermine(carline, dedie) -> Determine(carline, mala)\nforall x (Transduce(x, dedie) -> Unstarred(x))\nOblige(carline, dedie) -> Oblige(dedie, mala)\nforall x (Sintered(x) and Transduce(x, mala) -> Oblige(x, mala))\nforall x (Determine(x, carline) -> Oblige(x, carline))\nforall x (Determine(x, mala) -> Oblige(mala, dedie))\nforall x (Determine(x, dedie) -> Transduce(x, dedie))\nforall x (Determine(x, carline) and Transduce(carline, dedie) -> Transduce(x, mala))\n\nnot Unstarred(mala)\n\nDetermine(mala, dedie) and forall x (Determine(x, dedie) -> Transduce(x, dedie)) -> therefore Transduce(mala, dedie) Transduce(mala, dedie) and forall x (Transduce(x, dedie) -> Unstarred(x)) -> therefore Unstarred(mala)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The mylo is prakritic. The mylo is undried. The mylo is accurst. The mylo is slivery. The mylo suggest the moreen. The moreen suggest the mylo. The ikey nettle the moreen. The ikey is undried. The ikey is slivery. The ikey suggest the mylo. If the mylo nettle the moreen then the mylo nettle the ikey. If something suggest the moreen then it is accurst. If the mylo despatch the moreen then the moreen despatch the ikey. If something is myoid and it suggest the ikey then it despatch the ikey. If something nettle the mylo then it despatch the mylo. If something nettle the ikey then the ikey despatch the moreen. If something nettle the moreen then it suggest the moreen. If something nettle the mylo and the mylo suggest the moreen then it suggest the ikey. The moreen does not visit the mylo.", "logic": "\nPrakritic(mylo)\nUndried(mylo)\nAccurst(mylo)\nSlivery(mylo)\nSuggest(mylo, moreen)\nSuggest(moreen, mylo)\nNettle(ikey, moreen)\nUndried(ikey)\nSlivery(ikey)\nSuggest(ikey, mylo)\nNettle(mylo, moreen) -> Nettle(mylo, ikey)\nforall x (Suggest(x, moreen) -> Accurst(x))\nDespatch(mylo, moreen) -> Despatch(moreen, ikey)\nforall x (Myoid(x) and Suggest(x, ikey) -> Despatch(x, ikey))\nforall x (Nettle(x, mylo) -> Despatch(x, mylo))\nforall x (Nettle(x, ikey) -> Despatch(ikey, moreen))\nforall x (Nettle(x, moreen) -> Suggest(x, moreen))\nforall x (Nettle(x, mylo) and Suggest(mylo, moreen) -> Suggest(x, ikey))\n\nnot Despatch(moreen, mylo)\n\nforall x (Nettle(x, mylo) -> Despatch(x, mylo)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The neron is seafaring. The neron is epical. The neron is meet. The neron is modernised. The neron windsurf the clea. The clea windsurf the neron. The auria divest the clea. The auria is epical. The auria is modernised. The auria windsurf the neron. If the neron divest the clea then the neron divest the auria. If something windsurf the clea then it is meet. If the neron tussle the clea then the clea tussle the auria. If something is voteless and it windsurf the auria then it tussle the auria. If something divest the neron then it tussle the neron. If something divest the auria then the auria tussle the clea. If something divest the clea then it windsurf the clea. If something divest the neron and the neron windsurf the clea then it windsurf the auria. The clea is meet.", "logic": "\nSeafaring(neron)\nEpical(neron)\nMeet(neron)\nModernised(neron)\nWindsurf(neron, clea)\nWindsurf(clea, neron)\nDivest(auria, clea)\nEpical(auria)\nModernised(auria)\nWindsurf(auria, neron)\nDivest(neron, clea) -> Divest(neron, auria)\nforall x (Windsurf(x, clea) -> Meet(x))\nTussle(neron, clea) -> Tussle(clea, auria)\nforall x (Voteless(x) and Windsurf(x, auria) -> Tussle(x, auria))\nforall x (Divest(x, neron) -> Tussle(x, neron))\nforall x (Divest(x, auria) -> Tussle(auria, clea))\nforall x (Divest(x, clea) -> Windsurf(x, clea))\nforall x (Divest(x, neron) and Windsurf(neron, clea) -> Windsurf(x, auria))\n\nMeet(clea)\n\nforall x (Windsurf(x, clea) -> Meet(x)) <- forall x (Divest(x, clea) -> Windsurf(x, clea)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The delila is baboonish. The delila is oblong. The delila is brut. The delila is unimodal. The delila behoove the laurens. The laurens behoove the delila. The lolly bewitch the laurens. The lolly is oblong. The lolly is unimodal. The lolly behoove the delila. If the delila bewitch the laurens then the delila bewitch the lolly. If something behoove the laurens then it is brut. If the delila letter the laurens then the laurens letter the lolly. If something is veritable and it behoove the lolly then it letter the lolly. If something bewitch the delila then it letter the delila. If something bewitch the lolly then the lolly letter the laurens. If something bewitch the laurens then it behoove the laurens. If something bewitch the delila and the delila behoove the laurens then it behoove the lolly. The lolly does not visit the delila.", "logic": "\nBaboonish(delila)\nOblong(delila)\nBrut(delila)\nUnimodal(delila)\nBehoove(delila, laurens)\nBehoove(laurens, delila)\nBewitch(lolly, laurens)\nOblong(lolly)\nUnimodal(lolly)\nBehoove(lolly, delila)\nBewitch(delila, laurens) -> Bewitch(delila, lolly)\nforall x (Behoove(x, laurens) -> Brut(x))\nLetter(delila, laurens) -> Letter(laurens, lolly)\nforall x (Veritable(x) and Behoove(x, lolly) -> Letter(x, lolly))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, delila) -> Letter(x, delila))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, lolly) -> Letter(lolly, laurens))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, laurens) -> Behoove(x, laurens))\nforall x (Bewitch(x, delila) and Behoove(delila, laurens) -> Behoove(x, lolly))\n\nnot Letter(lolly, delila)\n\nforall x (Bewitch(x, delila) -> Letter(x, delila)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The lanna is internal. The lanna is hurtful. The lanna is acellular. The lanna is stoppable. The lanna case the gavrielle. The gavrielle case the lanna. The philippe bereave the gavrielle. The philippe is hurtful. The philippe is stoppable. The philippe case the lanna. If the lanna bereave the gavrielle then the lanna bereave the philippe. If something case the gavrielle then it is acellular. If the lanna discontent the gavrielle then the gavrielle discontent the philippe. If something is veined and it case the philippe then it discontent the philippe. If something bereave the lanna then it discontent the lanna. If something bereave the philippe then the philippe discontent the gavrielle. If something bereave the gavrielle then it case the gavrielle. If something bereave the lanna and the lanna case the gavrielle then it case the philippe. The philippe is veined.", "logic": "\nInternal(lanna)\nHurtful(lanna)\nAcellular(lanna)\nStoppable(lanna)\nCase(lanna, gavrielle)\nCase(gavrielle, lanna)\nBereave(philippe, gavrielle)\nHurtful(philippe)\nStoppable(philippe)\nCase(philippe, lanna)\nBereave(lanna, gavrielle) -> Bereave(lanna, philippe)\nforall x (Case(x, gavrielle) -> Acellular(x))\nDiscontent(lanna, gavrielle) -> Discontent(gavrielle, philippe)\nforall x (Veined(x) and Case(x, philippe) -> Discontent(x, philippe))\nforall x (Bereave(x, lanna) -> Discontent(x, lanna))\nforall x (Bereave(x, philippe) -> Discontent(philippe, gavrielle))\nforall x (Bereave(x, gavrielle) -> Case(x, gavrielle))\nforall x (Bereave(x, lanna) and Case(lanna, gavrielle) -> Case(x, philippe))\n\nVeined(philippe)\n\nVeined(philippe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The sheryl is surmounted. The sheryl is carbonous. The sheryl is kaput. The sheryl is tyrolean. The sheryl degauss the tiffie. The tiffie degauss the sheryl. The kissie groom the tiffie. The kissie is carbonous. The kissie is tyrolean. The kissie degauss the sheryl. If the sheryl groom the tiffie then the sheryl groom the kissie. If something degauss the tiffie then it is kaput. If the sheryl dramatise the tiffie then the tiffie dramatise the kissie. If something is beninese and it degauss the kissie then it dramatise the kissie. If something groom the sheryl then it dramatise the sheryl. If something groom the kissie then the kissie dramatise the tiffie. If something groom the tiffie then it degauss the tiffie. If something groom the sheryl and the sheryl degauss the tiffie then it degauss the kissie. The tiffie is not carbonous.", "logic": "\nSurmounted(sheryl)\nCarbonous(sheryl)\nKaput(sheryl)\nTyrolean(sheryl)\nDegauss(sheryl, tiffie)\nDegauss(tiffie, sheryl)\nGroom(kissie, tiffie)\nCarbonous(kissie)\nTyrolean(kissie)\nDegauss(kissie, sheryl)\nGroom(sheryl, tiffie) -> Groom(sheryl, kissie)\nforall x (Degauss(x, tiffie) -> Kaput(x))\nDramatise(sheryl, tiffie) -> Dramatise(tiffie, kissie)\nforall x (Beninese(x) and Degauss(x, kissie) -> Dramatise(x, kissie))\nforall x (Groom(x, sheryl) -> Dramatise(x, sheryl))\nforall x (Groom(x, kissie) -> Dramatise(kissie, tiffie))\nforall x (Groom(x, tiffie) -> Degauss(x, tiffie))\nforall x (Groom(x, sheryl) and Degauss(sheryl, tiffie) -> Degauss(x, kissie))\n\nnot Carbonous(tiffie)\n\nnot Carbonous(tiffie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "The viki is photogenic. The viki is thematic. The viki is bridal. The viki is aphetic. The viki pacify the fanny. The fanny pacify the viki. The hester espouse the fanny. The hester is thematic. The hester is aphetic. The hester pacify the viki. If the viki espouse the fanny then the viki espouse the hester. If something pacify the fanny then it is bridal. If the viki whale the fanny then the fanny whale the hester. If something is sozzled and it pacify the hester then it whale the hester. If something espouse the viki then it whale the viki. If something espouse the hester then the hester whale the fanny. If something espouse the fanny then it pacify the fanny. If something espouse the viki and the viki pacify the fanny then it pacify the hester. The fanny espouse the fanny.", "logic": "\nPhotogenic(viki)\nThematic(viki)\nBridal(viki)\nAphetic(viki)\nPacify(viki, fanny)\nPacify(fanny, viki)\nEspouse(hester, fanny)\nThematic(hester)\nAphetic(hester)\nPacify(hester, viki)\nEspouse(viki, fanny) -> Espouse(viki, hester)\nforall x (Pacify(x, fanny) -> Bridal(x))\nWhale(viki, fanny) -> Whale(fanny, hester)\nforall x (Sozzled(x) and Pacify(x, hester) -> Whale(x, hester))\nforall x (Espouse(x, viki) -> Whale(x, viki))\nforall x (Espouse(x, hester) -> Whale(hester, fanny))\nforall x (Espouse(x, fanny) -> Pacify(x, fanny))\nforall x (Espouse(x, viki) and Pacify(viki, fanny) -> Pacify(x, hester))\n\nEspouse(fanny, fanny)\n\nEspouse(fanny, fanny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1272"} {"premises": "Roderic is prime. Roderic is sere. Nicolina is sere. Nicolina is frowsy. Nicolina is paintable. Mufi is ungarbed. Mufi is prime. Mufi is paintable. Kellen is cramped. Kellen is ungarbed. Kellen is prime. Kellen is sere. Kellen is mealy. Kellen is frowsy. Kellen is paintable. If someone is sere and frowsy then they are prime. White, mealy people are ungarbed. All sere, prime people are mealy. Kellen is cramped.", "logic": "\nPrime(roderic)\nSere(roderic)\nSere(nicolina)\nFrowsy(nicolina)\nPaintable(nicolina)\nUngarbed(mufi)\nPrime(mufi)\nPaintable(mufi)\nCramped(kellen)\nUngarbed(kellen)\nPrime(kellen)\nSere(kellen)\nMealy(kellen)\nFrowsy(kellen)\nPaintable(kellen)\nforall x (Sere(x) and Frowsy(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Frowsy(x) and Mealy(x) -> Ungarbed(x))\nforall x (Sere(x) and Prime(x) -> Mealy(x))\n\nCramped(kellen)\n\ntherefore Cramped(kellen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Halimeda is perforated. Halimeda is bigeneric. Thibaut is bigeneric. Thibaut is shambolic. Thibaut is giant. Cindie is disdainful. Cindie is perforated. Cindie is giant. Thebault is squeezable. Thebault is disdainful. Thebault is perforated. Thebault is bigeneric. Thebault is bivalent. Thebault is shambolic. Thebault is giant. If someone is bigeneric and shambolic then they are perforated. White, bivalent people are disdainful. All bigeneric, perforated people are bivalent. Halimeda is not perforated.", "logic": "\nPerforated(halimeda)\nBigeneric(halimeda)\nBigeneric(thibaut)\nShambolic(thibaut)\nGiant(thibaut)\nDisdainful(cindie)\nPerforated(cindie)\nGiant(cindie)\nSqueezable(thebault)\nDisdainful(thebault)\nPerforated(thebault)\nBigeneric(thebault)\nBivalent(thebault)\nShambolic(thebault)\nGiant(thebault)\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Shambolic(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Shambolic(x) and Bivalent(x) -> Disdainful(x))\nforall x (Bigeneric(x) and Perforated(x) -> Bivalent(x))\n\nnot Perforated(halimeda)\n\ntherefore Perforated(halimeda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Bianca is parked. Bianca is chinchy. Colleen is chinchy. Colleen is unpleasant. Colleen is jailed. Doretta is redemptive. Doretta is parked. Doretta is jailed. Genovera is cadenced. Genovera is redemptive. Genovera is parked. Genovera is chinchy. Genovera is amphoteric. Genovera is unpleasant. Genovera is jailed. If someone is chinchy and unpleasant then they are parked. White, amphoteric people are redemptive. All chinchy, parked people are amphoteric. Bianca is amphoteric.", "logic": "\nParked(bianca)\nChinchy(bianca)\nChinchy(colleen)\nUnpleasant(colleen)\nJailed(colleen)\nRedemptive(doretta)\nParked(doretta)\nJailed(doretta)\nCadenced(genovera)\nRedemptive(genovera)\nParked(genovera)\nChinchy(genovera)\nAmphoteric(genovera)\nUnpleasant(genovera)\nJailed(genovera)\nforall x (Chinchy(x) and Unpleasant(x) -> Parked(x))\nforall x (Unpleasant(x) and Amphoteric(x) -> Redemptive(x))\nforall x (Chinchy(x) and Parked(x) -> Amphoteric(x))\n\nAmphoteric(bianca)\n\nChinchy(bianca) and Parked(bianca) and forall x (Chinchy(x) and Parked(x) -> Amphoteric(x)) -> therefore Amphoteric(bianca)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Gertrudis is starved. Gertrudis is undesired. Janenna is undesired. Janenna is causative. Janenna is unlikeable. Birdie is bionomical. Birdie is starved. Birdie is unlikeable. Willem is vagile. Willem is bionomical. Willem is starved. Willem is undesired. Willem is late. Willem is causative. Willem is unlikeable. If someone is undesired and causative then they are starved. White, late people are bionomical. All undesired, starved people are late. Janenna is not starved.", "logic": "\nStarved(gertrudis)\nUndesired(gertrudis)\nUndesired(janenna)\nCausative(janenna)\nUnlikeable(janenna)\nBionomical(birdie)\nStarved(birdie)\nUnlikeable(birdie)\nVagile(willem)\nBionomical(willem)\nStarved(willem)\nUndesired(willem)\nLate(willem)\nCausative(willem)\nUnlikeable(willem)\nforall x (Undesired(x) and Causative(x) -> Starved(x))\nforall x (Causative(x) and Late(x) -> Bionomical(x))\nforall x (Undesired(x) and Starved(x) -> Late(x))\n\nnot Starved(janenna)\n\nUndesired(janenna) and Causative(janenna) and forall x (Undesired(x) and Causative(x) -> Starved(x)) -> therefore Starved(janenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Issy is accessible. Issy is brainless. Hari is brainless. Hari is lanky. Hari is iliac. Briteny is acidulous. Briteny is accessible. Briteny is iliac. Jordy is ghostly. Jordy is acidulous. Jordy is accessible. Jordy is brainless. Jordy is masonic. Jordy is lanky. Jordy is iliac. If someone is brainless and lanky then they are accessible. White, masonic people are acidulous. All brainless, accessible people are masonic. Hari is masonic.", "logic": "\nAccessible(issy)\nBrainless(issy)\nBrainless(hari)\nLanky(hari)\nIliac(hari)\nAcidulous(briteny)\nAccessible(briteny)\nIliac(briteny)\nGhostly(jordy)\nAcidulous(jordy)\nAccessible(jordy)\nBrainless(jordy)\nMasonic(jordy)\nLanky(jordy)\nIliac(jordy)\nforall x (Brainless(x) and Lanky(x) -> Accessible(x))\nforall x (Lanky(x) and Masonic(x) -> Acidulous(x))\nforall x (Brainless(x) and Accessible(x) -> Masonic(x))\n\nMasonic(hari)\n\nBrainless(hari) and Lanky(hari) and forall x (Brainless(x) and Lanky(x) -> Accessible(x)) -> therefore Accessible(hari) Brainless(hari) and Accessible(hari) and forall x (Brainless(x) and Accessible(x) -> Masonic(x)) -> therefore Masonic(hari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Melany is barelegged. Melany is forbearing. Brenna is forbearing. Brenna is frigid. Brenna is vitalizing. Tann is orchestral. Tann is barelegged. Tann is vitalizing. Nikolia is coaxial. Nikolia is orchestral. Nikolia is barelegged. Nikolia is forbearing. Nikolia is smug. Nikolia is frigid. Nikolia is vitalizing. If someone is forbearing and frigid then they are barelegged. White, smug people are orchestral. All forbearing, barelegged people are smug. Brenna is not smug.", "logic": "\nBarelegged(melany)\nForbearing(melany)\nForbearing(brenna)\nFrigid(brenna)\nVitalizing(brenna)\nOrchestral(tann)\nBarelegged(tann)\nVitalizing(tann)\nCoaxial(nikolia)\nOrchestral(nikolia)\nBarelegged(nikolia)\nForbearing(nikolia)\nSmug(nikolia)\nFrigid(nikolia)\nVitalizing(nikolia)\nforall x (Forbearing(x) and Frigid(x) -> Barelegged(x))\nforall x (Frigid(x) and Smug(x) -> Orchestral(x))\nforall x (Forbearing(x) and Barelegged(x) -> Smug(x))\n\nnot Smug(brenna)\n\nForbearing(brenna) and Frigid(brenna) and forall x (Forbearing(x) and Frigid(x) -> Barelegged(x)) -> therefore Barelegged(brenna) Forbearing(brenna) and Barelegged(brenna) and forall x (Forbearing(x) and Barelegged(x) -> Smug(x)) -> therefore Smug(brenna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Wright is jinxed. Wright is neurotic. Sharl is neurotic. Sharl is immaterial. Sharl is safe. Vinni is sudanese. Vinni is jinxed. Vinni is safe. Torey is greasy. Torey is sudanese. Torey is jinxed. Torey is neurotic. Torey is consenting. Torey is immaterial. Torey is safe. If someone is neurotic and immaterial then they are jinxed. White, consenting people are sudanese. All neurotic, jinxed people are consenting. Sharl is sudanese.", "logic": "\nJinxed(wright)\nNeurotic(wright)\nNeurotic(sharl)\nImmaterial(sharl)\nSafe(sharl)\nSudanese(vinni)\nJinxed(vinni)\nSafe(vinni)\nGreasy(torey)\nSudanese(torey)\nJinxed(torey)\nNeurotic(torey)\nConsenting(torey)\nImmaterial(torey)\nSafe(torey)\nforall x (Neurotic(x) and Immaterial(x) -> Jinxed(x))\nforall x (Immaterial(x) and Consenting(x) -> Sudanese(x))\nforall x (Neurotic(x) and Jinxed(x) -> Consenting(x))\n\nSudanese(sharl)\n\nNeurotic(sharl) and Immaterial(sharl) and forall x (Neurotic(x) and Immaterial(x) -> Jinxed(x)) -> therefore Jinxed(sharl) Neurotic(sharl) and Jinxed(sharl) and forall x (Neurotic(x) and Jinxed(x) -> Consenting(x)) -> therefore Consenting(sharl) Immaterial(sharl) and Consenting(sharl) and forall x (Immaterial(x) and Consenting(x) -> Sudanese(x)) -> therefore Sudanese(sharl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Madelaine is fourteen. Madelaine is ribbonlike. Pip is ribbonlike. Pip is lessened. Pip is casual. Glenine is prussian. Glenine is fourteen. Glenine is casual. Coreen is aurous. Coreen is prussian. Coreen is fourteen. Coreen is ribbonlike. Coreen is lavender. Coreen is lessened. Coreen is casual. If someone is ribbonlike and lessened then they are fourteen. White, lavender people are prussian. All ribbonlike, fourteen people are lavender. Pip is not prussian.", "logic": "\nFourteen(madelaine)\nRibbonlike(madelaine)\nRibbonlike(pip)\nLessened(pip)\nCasual(pip)\nPrussian(glenine)\nFourteen(glenine)\nCasual(glenine)\nAurous(coreen)\nPrussian(coreen)\nFourteen(coreen)\nRibbonlike(coreen)\nLavender(coreen)\nLessened(coreen)\nCasual(coreen)\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Lessened(x) -> Fourteen(x))\nforall x (Lessened(x) and Lavender(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Fourteen(x) -> Lavender(x))\n\nnot Prussian(pip)\n\nRibbonlike(pip) and Lessened(pip) and forall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Lessened(x) -> Fourteen(x)) -> therefore Fourteen(pip) Ribbonlike(pip) and Fourteen(pip) and forall x (Ribbonlike(x) and Fourteen(x) -> Lavender(x)) -> therefore Lavender(pip) Lessened(pip) and Lavender(pip) and forall x (Lessened(x) and Lavender(x) -> Prussian(x)) -> therefore Prussian(pip)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Alameda is seamanlike. Alameda is left. Lorianne is left. Lorianne is jellylike. Lorianne is coloured. Trace is necklike. Trace is seamanlike. Trace is coloured. Carina is bespoken. Carina is necklike. Carina is seamanlike. Carina is left. Carina is camp. Carina is jellylike. Carina is coloured. If someone is left and jellylike then they are seamanlike. White, camp people are necklike. All left, seamanlike people are camp. Trace is not camp.", "logic": "\nSeamanlike(alameda)\nLeft(alameda)\nLeft(lorianne)\nJellylike(lorianne)\nColoured(lorianne)\nNecklike(trace)\nSeamanlike(trace)\nColoured(trace)\nBespoken(carina)\nNecklike(carina)\nSeamanlike(carina)\nLeft(carina)\nCamp(carina)\nJellylike(carina)\nColoured(carina)\nforall x (Left(x) and Jellylike(x) -> Seamanlike(x))\nforall x (Jellylike(x) and Camp(x) -> Necklike(x))\nforall x (Left(x) and Seamanlike(x) -> Camp(x))\n\nnot Camp(trace)\n\nforall x (Left(x) and Seamanlike(x) -> Camp(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Sheffy is overfed. Sheffy is bullnecked. Beau is bullnecked. Beau is peppery. Beau is carangid. Daisey is tahitian. Daisey is overfed. Daisey is carangid. Elana is excited. Elana is tahitian. Elana is overfed. Elana is bullnecked. Elana is praetorial. Elana is peppery. Elana is carangid. If someone is bullnecked and peppery then they are overfed. White, praetorial people are tahitian. All bullnecked, overfed people are praetorial. Sheffy is tahitian.", "logic": "\nOverfed(sheffy)\nBullnecked(sheffy)\nBullnecked(beau)\nPeppery(beau)\nCarangid(beau)\nTahitian(daisey)\nOverfed(daisey)\nCarangid(daisey)\nExcited(elana)\nTahitian(elana)\nOverfed(elana)\nBullnecked(elana)\nPraetorial(elana)\nPeppery(elana)\nCarangid(elana)\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) and Peppery(x) -> Overfed(x))\nforall x (Peppery(x) and Praetorial(x) -> Tahitian(x))\nforall x (Bullnecked(x) and Overfed(x) -> Praetorial(x))\n\nTahitian(sheffy)\n\nforall x (Peppery(x) and Praetorial(x) -> Tahitian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Zandra is excusable. Zandra is unicuspid. Alta is unicuspid. Alta is mordacious. Alta is multiplex. Cornellis is cinerary. Cornellis is excusable. Cornellis is multiplex. Teresina is faithless. Teresina is cinerary. Teresina is excusable. Teresina is unicuspid. Teresina is zapotec. Teresina is mordacious. Teresina is multiplex. If someone is unicuspid and mordacious then they are excusable. White, zapotec people are cinerary. All unicuspid, excusable people are zapotec. Zandra is not mordacious.", "logic": "\nExcusable(zandra)\nUnicuspid(zandra)\nUnicuspid(alta)\nMordacious(alta)\nMultiplex(alta)\nCinerary(cornellis)\nExcusable(cornellis)\nMultiplex(cornellis)\nFaithless(teresina)\nCinerary(teresina)\nExcusable(teresina)\nUnicuspid(teresina)\nZapotec(teresina)\nMordacious(teresina)\nMultiplex(teresina)\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) and Mordacious(x) -> Excusable(x))\nforall x (Mordacious(x) and Zapotec(x) -> Cinerary(x))\nforall x (Unicuspid(x) and Excusable(x) -> Zapotec(x))\n\nnot Mordacious(zandra)\n\nnot Mordacious(zandra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Barri is legible. Barri is advised. Neilla is advised. Neilla is classless. Neilla is colossal. Jaynell is poorly. Jaynell is legible. Jaynell is colossal. Almeda is ocular. Almeda is poorly. Almeda is legible. Almeda is advised. Almeda is buddhistic. Almeda is classless. Almeda is colossal. If someone is advised and classless then they are legible. White, buddhistic people are poorly. All advised, legible people are buddhistic. Barri is colossal.", "logic": "\nLegible(barri)\nAdvised(barri)\nAdvised(neilla)\nClassless(neilla)\nColossal(neilla)\nPoorly(jaynell)\nLegible(jaynell)\nColossal(jaynell)\nOcular(almeda)\nPoorly(almeda)\nLegible(almeda)\nAdvised(almeda)\nBuddhistic(almeda)\nClassless(almeda)\nColossal(almeda)\nforall x (Advised(x) and Classless(x) -> Legible(x))\nforall x (Classless(x) and Buddhistic(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Advised(x) and Legible(x) -> Buddhistic(x))\n\nColossal(barri)\n\nColossal(barri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Aeriela is reducible. Aeriela is peccant. Caryl is peccant. Caryl is coloured. Caryl is bestubbled. Brett is charitable. Brett is reducible. Brett is bestubbled. Ezra is beakless. Ezra is charitable. Ezra is reducible. Ezra is peccant. Ezra is surprising. Ezra is coloured. Ezra is bestubbled. If someone is peccant and coloured then they are reducible. White, surprising people are charitable. All peccant, reducible people are surprising. Brett is not peccant.", "logic": "\nReducible(aeriela)\nPeccant(aeriela)\nPeccant(caryl)\nColoured(caryl)\nBestubbled(caryl)\nCharitable(brett)\nReducible(brett)\nBestubbled(brett)\nBeakless(ezra)\nCharitable(ezra)\nReducible(ezra)\nPeccant(ezra)\nSurprising(ezra)\nColoured(ezra)\nBestubbled(ezra)\nforall x (Peccant(x) and Coloured(x) -> Reducible(x))\nforall x (Coloured(x) and Surprising(x) -> Charitable(x))\nforall x (Peccant(x) and Reducible(x) -> Surprising(x))\n\nnot Peccant(brett)\n\nnot Peccant(brett) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Christan is bordered. Christan is resurgent. Opaline is resurgent. Opaline is honeyed. Opaline is persuasive. Fairfax is rattled. Fairfax is bordered. Fairfax is persuasive. Pru is snafu. Pru is rattled. Pru is bordered. Pru is resurgent. Pru is acuate. Pru is honeyed. Pru is persuasive. If someone is resurgent and honeyed then they are bordered. White, acuate people are rattled. All resurgent, bordered people are acuate. Opaline is snafu.", "logic": "\nBordered(christan)\nResurgent(christan)\nResurgent(opaline)\nHoneyed(opaline)\nPersuasive(opaline)\nRattled(fairfax)\nBordered(fairfax)\nPersuasive(fairfax)\nSnafu(pru)\nRattled(pru)\nBordered(pru)\nResurgent(pru)\nAcuate(pru)\nHoneyed(pru)\nPersuasive(pru)\nforall x (Resurgent(x) and Honeyed(x) -> Bordered(x))\nforall x (Honeyed(x) and Acuate(x) -> Rattled(x))\nforall x (Resurgent(x) and Bordered(x) -> Acuate(x))\n\nSnafu(opaline)\n\nSnafu(opaline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Antoni is vertebral. Antoni is fleet. Etty is fleet. Etty is slicked. Etty is sorcerous. Eleanore is nearby. Eleanore is vertebral. Eleanore is sorcerous. Burton is paperlike. Burton is nearby. Burton is vertebral. Burton is fleet. Burton is siberian. Burton is slicked. Burton is sorcerous. If someone is fleet and slicked then they are vertebral. White, siberian people are nearby. All fleet, vertebral people are siberian. Eleanore is not slicked.", "logic": "\nVertebral(antoni)\nFleet(antoni)\nFleet(etty)\nSlicked(etty)\nSorcerous(etty)\nNearby(eleanore)\nVertebral(eleanore)\nSorcerous(eleanore)\nPaperlike(burton)\nNearby(burton)\nVertebral(burton)\nFleet(burton)\nSiberian(burton)\nSlicked(burton)\nSorcerous(burton)\nforall x (Fleet(x) and Slicked(x) -> Vertebral(x))\nforall x (Slicked(x) and Siberian(x) -> Nearby(x))\nforall x (Fleet(x) and Vertebral(x) -> Siberian(x))\n\nnot Slicked(eleanore)\n\nnot Slicked(eleanore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "Noreen is inst. Noreen is diastolic. Kris is diastolic. Kris is squelched. Kris is snotty. Christin is starred. Christin is inst. Christin is snotty. Janot is temporal. Janot is starred. Janot is inst. Janot is diastolic. Janot is achromatic. Janot is squelched. Janot is snotty. If someone is diastolic and squelched then they are inst. White, achromatic people are starred. All diastolic, inst people are achromatic. Noreen is temporal.", "logic": "\nInst(noreen)\nDiastolic(noreen)\nDiastolic(kris)\nSquelched(kris)\nSnotty(kris)\nStarred(christin)\nInst(christin)\nSnotty(christin)\nTemporal(janot)\nStarred(janot)\nInst(janot)\nDiastolic(janot)\nAchromatic(janot)\nSquelched(janot)\nSnotty(janot)\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Squelched(x) -> Inst(x))\nforall x (Squelched(x) and Achromatic(x) -> Starred(x))\nforall x (Diastolic(x) and Inst(x) -> Achromatic(x))\n\nTemporal(noreen)\n\nTemporal(noreen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-233"} {"premises": "The heida is bouldered. If something is elating and passee then it is not gaelic. All passee things are elating. If something is elating and not bouldered then it is not passee. If something is bouldered then it is passee. All bouldered things are passee. If the heida is not veracious then the heida is elating. If the heida is not bouldered then the heida is elating. If the heida is elating and the heida is passee then the heida is not gaelic. The heida is bouldered.", "logic": "\nBouldered(heida)\nforall x (Elating(x) and Passee(x) -> not Gaelic(x))\nforall x (Passee(x) -> Elating(x))\nforall x (Elating(x) and not Bouldered(x) -> not Passee(x))\nforall x (Bouldered(x) -> Passee(x))\nforall x (Bouldered(x) -> Passee(x))\nnot Veracious(heida) -> Elating(heida)\nnot Bouldered(heida) -> Elating(heida)\nElating(heida) and Passee(heida) -> not Gaelic(heida)\n\nBouldered(heida)\n\ntherefore Bouldered(heida)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The margo is unhumorous. If something is coarsened and liable then it is not panicled. All liable things are coarsened. If something is coarsened and not unhumorous then it is not liable. If something is unhumorous then it is liable. All unhumorous things are liable. If the margo is not humourous then the margo is coarsened. If the margo is not unhumorous then the margo is coarsened. If the margo is coarsened and the margo is liable then the margo is not panicled. The margo is not unhumorous.", "logic": "\nUnhumorous(margo)\nforall x (Coarsened(x) and Liable(x) -> not Panicled(x))\nforall x (Liable(x) -> Coarsened(x))\nforall x (Coarsened(x) and not Unhumorous(x) -> not Liable(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) -> Liable(x))\nforall x (Unhumorous(x) -> Liable(x))\nnot Humourous(margo) -> Coarsened(margo)\nnot Unhumorous(margo) -> Coarsened(margo)\nCoarsened(margo) and Liable(margo) -> not Panicled(margo)\n\nnot Unhumorous(margo)\n\ntherefore Unhumorous(margo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The susanetta is adust. If something is prodromal and disposed then it is not hugoesque. All disposed things are prodromal. If something is prodromal and not adust then it is not disposed. If something is adust then it is disposed. All adust things are disposed. If the susanetta is not isotropous then the susanetta is prodromal. If the susanetta is not adust then the susanetta is prodromal. If the susanetta is prodromal and the susanetta is disposed then the susanetta is not hugoesque. The susanetta is disposed.", "logic": "\nAdust(susanetta)\nforall x (Prodromal(x) and Disposed(x) -> not Hugoesque(x))\nforall x (Disposed(x) -> Prodromal(x))\nforall x (Prodromal(x) and not Adust(x) -> not Disposed(x))\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Disposed(x))\nforall x (Adust(x) -> Disposed(x))\nnot Isotropous(susanetta) -> Prodromal(susanetta)\nnot Adust(susanetta) -> Prodromal(susanetta)\nProdromal(susanetta) and Disposed(susanetta) -> not Hugoesque(susanetta)\n\nDisposed(susanetta)\n\nAdust(susanetta) and forall x (Adust(x) -> Disposed(x)) -> therefore Disposed(susanetta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The storm is blowzy. If something is credited and horrendous then it is not hearing. All horrendous things are credited. If something is credited and not blowzy then it is not horrendous. If something is blowzy then it is horrendous. All blowzy things are horrendous. If the storm is not draining then the storm is credited. If the storm is not blowzy then the storm is credited. If the storm is credited and the storm is horrendous then the storm is not hearing. The storm is not horrendous.", "logic": "\nBlowzy(storm)\nforall x (Credited(x) and Horrendous(x) -> not Hearing(x))\nforall x (Horrendous(x) -> Credited(x))\nforall x (Credited(x) and not Blowzy(x) -> not Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Blowzy(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nforall x (Blowzy(x) -> Horrendous(x))\nnot Draining(storm) -> Credited(storm)\nnot Blowzy(storm) -> Credited(storm)\nCredited(storm) and Horrendous(storm) -> not Hearing(storm)\n\nnot Horrendous(storm)\n\nBlowzy(storm) and forall x (Blowzy(x) -> Horrendous(x)) -> therefore Horrendous(storm)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The wittie is parented. If something is comestible and ethereal then it is not duckbill. All ethereal things are comestible. If something is comestible and not parented then it is not ethereal. If something is parented then it is ethereal. All parented things are ethereal. If the wittie is not newsless then the wittie is comestible. If the wittie is not parented then the wittie is comestible. If the wittie is comestible and the wittie is ethereal then the wittie is not duckbill. The wittie is comestible.", "logic": "\nParented(wittie)\nforall x (Comestible(x) and Ethereal(x) -> not Duckbill(x))\nforall x (Ethereal(x) -> Comestible(x))\nforall x (Comestible(x) and not Parented(x) -> not Ethereal(x))\nforall x (Parented(x) -> Ethereal(x))\nforall x (Parented(x) -> Ethereal(x))\nnot Newsless(wittie) -> Comestible(wittie)\nnot Parented(wittie) -> Comestible(wittie)\nComestible(wittie) and Ethereal(wittie) -> not Duckbill(wittie)\n\nComestible(wittie)\n\nParented(wittie) and forall x (Parented(x) -> Ethereal(x)) -> therefore Ethereal(wittie) Ethereal(wittie) and forall x (Ethereal(x) -> Comestible(x)) -> therefore Comestible(wittie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The tamarra is weedless. If something is crossed and mirthful then it is not much. All mirthful things are crossed. If something is crossed and not weedless then it is not mirthful. If something is weedless then it is mirthful. All weedless things are mirthful. If the tamarra is not lucifugal then the tamarra is crossed. If the tamarra is not weedless then the tamarra is crossed. If the tamarra is crossed and the tamarra is mirthful then the tamarra is not much. The tamarra is not crossed.", "logic": "\nWeedless(tamarra)\nforall x (Crossed(x) and Mirthful(x) -> not Much(x))\nforall x (Mirthful(x) -> Crossed(x))\nforall x (Crossed(x) and not Weedless(x) -> not Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Weedless(x) -> Mirthful(x))\nforall x (Weedless(x) -> Mirthful(x))\nnot Lucifugal(tamarra) -> Crossed(tamarra)\nnot Weedless(tamarra) -> Crossed(tamarra)\nCrossed(tamarra) and Mirthful(tamarra) -> not Much(tamarra)\n\nnot Crossed(tamarra)\n\nWeedless(tamarra) and forall x (Weedless(x) -> Mirthful(x)) -> therefore Mirthful(tamarra) Mirthful(tamarra) and forall x (Mirthful(x) -> Crossed(x)) -> therefore Crossed(tamarra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The coletta is placating. If something is handmade and overbold then it is not dextral. All overbold things are handmade. If something is handmade and not placating then it is not overbold. If something is placating then it is overbold. All placating things are overbold. If the coletta is not subsonic then the coletta is handmade. If the coletta is not placating then the coletta is handmade. If the coletta is handmade and the coletta is overbold then the coletta is not dextral. The coletta is not dextral.", "logic": "\nPlacating(coletta)\nforall x (Handmade(x) and Overbold(x) -> not Dextral(x))\nforall x (Overbold(x) -> Handmade(x))\nforall x (Handmade(x) and not Placating(x) -> not Overbold(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Overbold(x))\nforall x (Placating(x) -> Overbold(x))\nnot Subsonic(coletta) -> Handmade(coletta)\nnot Placating(coletta) -> Handmade(coletta)\nHandmade(coletta) and Overbold(coletta) -> not Dextral(coletta)\n\nnot Dextral(coletta)\n\nPlacating(coletta) and forall x (Placating(x) -> Overbold(x)) -> therefore Overbold(coletta) Overbold(coletta) and forall x (Overbold(x) -> Handmade(x)) -> therefore Handmade(coletta) Placating(coletta) and forall x (Placating(x) -> Overbold(x)) -> therefore Overbold(coletta) Handmade(coletta) and Overbold(coletta) and forall x (Handmade(x) and Overbold(x) -> not Dextral(x)) -> therefore not Dextral(coletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The izabel is prussian. If something is cretaceous and immune then it is not imperfect. All immune things are cretaceous. If something is cretaceous and not prussian then it is not immune. If something is prussian then it is immune. All prussian things are immune. If the izabel is not hurtful then the izabel is cretaceous. If the izabel is not prussian then the izabel is cretaceous. If the izabel is cretaceous and the izabel is immune then the izabel is not imperfect. The izabel is imperfect.", "logic": "\nPrussian(izabel)\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) and Immune(x) -> not Imperfect(x))\nforall x (Immune(x) -> Cretaceous(x))\nforall x (Cretaceous(x) and not Prussian(x) -> not Immune(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) -> Immune(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) -> Immune(x))\nnot Hurtful(izabel) -> Cretaceous(izabel)\nnot Prussian(izabel) -> Cretaceous(izabel)\nCretaceous(izabel) and Immune(izabel) -> not Imperfect(izabel)\n\nImperfect(izabel)\n\nPrussian(izabel) and forall x (Prussian(x) -> Immune(x)) -> therefore Immune(izabel) Immune(izabel) and forall x (Immune(x) -> Cretaceous(x)) -> therefore Cretaceous(izabel) Prussian(izabel) and forall x (Prussian(x) -> Immune(x)) -> therefore Immune(izabel) Cretaceous(izabel) and Immune(izabel) and forall x (Cretaceous(x) and Immune(x) -> not Imperfect(x)) -> therefore not Imperfect(izabel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The bobette is allopathic. If something is benthal and lethal then it is not agraphic. All lethal things are benthal. If something is benthal and not allopathic then it is not lethal. If something is allopathic then it is lethal. All allopathic things are lethal. If the bobette is not thirteen then the bobette is benthal. If the bobette is not allopathic then the bobette is benthal. If the bobette is benthal and the bobette is lethal then the bobette is not agraphic. The bobette does not like the bobette.", "logic": "\nAllopathic(bobette)\nforall x (Benthal(x) and Lethal(x) -> not Agraphic(x))\nforall x (Lethal(x) -> Benthal(x))\nforall x (Benthal(x) and not Allopathic(x) -> not Lethal(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Lethal(x))\nforall x (Allopathic(x) -> Lethal(x))\nnot Thirteen(bobette) -> Benthal(bobette)\nnot Allopathic(bobette) -> Benthal(bobette)\nBenthal(bobette) and Lethal(bobette) -> not Agraphic(bobette)\n\nnot Likes(bobette, bobette)\n\nnot Likes(bobette, bobette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The phyllida is biaural. If something is maintained and arcadian then it is not activist. All arcadian things are maintained. If something is maintained and not biaural then it is not arcadian. If something is biaural then it is arcadian. All biaural things are arcadian. If the phyllida is not slurred then the phyllida is maintained. If the phyllida is not biaural then the phyllida is maintained. If the phyllida is maintained and the phyllida is arcadian then the phyllida is not activist. The phyllida is slurred.", "logic": "\nBiaural(phyllida)\nforall x (Maintained(x) and Arcadian(x) -> not Activist(x))\nforall x (Arcadian(x) -> Maintained(x))\nforall x (Maintained(x) and not Biaural(x) -> not Arcadian(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) -> Arcadian(x))\nforall x (Biaural(x) -> Arcadian(x))\nnot Slurred(phyllida) -> Maintained(phyllida)\nnot Biaural(phyllida) -> Maintained(phyllida)\nMaintained(phyllida) and Arcadian(phyllida) -> not Activist(phyllida)\n\nSlurred(phyllida)\n\nSlurred(phyllida) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The rae is sunken. If something is proustian and monogynous then it is not shamanist. All monogynous things are proustian. If something is proustian and not sunken then it is not monogynous. If something is sunken then it is monogynous. All sunken things are monogynous. If the rae is not filipino then the rae is proustian. If the rae is not sunken then the rae is proustian. If the rae is proustian and the rae is monogynous then the rae is not shamanist. The rae does not see the rae.", "logic": "\nSunken(rae)\nforall x (Proustian(x) and Monogynous(x) -> not Shamanist(x))\nforall x (Monogynous(x) -> Proustian(x))\nforall x (Proustian(x) and not Sunken(x) -> not Monogynous(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nforall x (Sunken(x) -> Monogynous(x))\nnot Filipino(rae) -> Proustian(rae)\nnot Sunken(rae) -> Proustian(rae)\nProustian(rae) and Monogynous(rae) -> not Shamanist(rae)\n\nnot Sees(rae, rae)\n\nnot Sees(rae, rae) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "The elladine is stubbly. If something is bionic and deaf then it is not roadless. All deaf things are bionic. If something is bionic and not stubbly then it is not deaf. If something is stubbly then it is deaf. All stubbly things are deaf. If the elladine is not boughless then the elladine is bionic. If the elladine is not stubbly then the elladine is bionic. If the elladine is bionic and the elladine is deaf then the elladine is not roadless. The elladine visits the elladine.", "logic": "\nStubbly(elladine)\nforall x (Bionic(x) and Deaf(x) -> not Roadless(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Bionic(x))\nforall x (Bionic(x) and not Stubbly(x) -> not Deaf(x))\nforall x (Stubbly(x) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Stubbly(x) -> Deaf(x))\nnot Boughless(elladine) -> Bionic(elladine)\nnot Stubbly(elladine) -> Bionic(elladine)\nBionic(elladine) and Deaf(elladine) -> not Roadless(elladine)\n\nVisits(elladine, elladine)\n\nVisits(elladine, elladine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1354"} {"premises": "Eugene is esoteric. Eugene is sarawakian. Eugene is confounded. Eugene is azido. Eugene is misused. Marcos is sarawakian. Elinore is fledgling. If someone is tagged and sarawakian then they are fledgling. All sarawakian, fledgling people are confounded. Furry people are tagged. Eugene is misused.", "logic": "\nEsoteric(eugene)\nSarawakian(eugene)\nConfounded(eugene)\nAzido(eugene)\nMisused(eugene)\nSarawakian(marcos)\nFledgling(elinore)\nforall x (Tagged(x) and Sarawakian(x) -> Fledgling(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) and Fledgling(x) -> Confounded(x))\nforall x (Sarawakian(x) -> Tagged(x))\n\nMisused(eugene)\n\ntherefore Misused(eugene)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Lon is drear. Lon is analog. Lon is ageless. Lon is shoreward. Lon is gossipy. Pippa is analog. Misty is proud. If someone is hideous and analog then they are proud. All analog, proud people are ageless. Furry people are hideous. Lon is not gossipy.", "logic": "\nDrear(lon)\nAnalog(lon)\nAgeless(lon)\nShoreward(lon)\nGossipy(lon)\nAnalog(pippa)\nProud(misty)\nforall x (Hideous(x) and Analog(x) -> Proud(x))\nforall x (Analog(x) and Proud(x) -> Ageless(x))\nforall x (Analog(x) -> Hideous(x))\n\nnot Gossipy(lon)\n\ntherefore Gossipy(lon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Edy is bicolor. Edy is livelong. Edy is fenestral. Edy is uneconomic. Edy is supersonic. Waine is livelong. Charlene is xlii. If someone is retrorse and livelong then they are xlii. All livelong, xlii people are fenestral. Furry people are retrorse. Waine is retrorse.", "logic": "\nBicolor(edy)\nLivelong(edy)\nFenestral(edy)\nUneconomic(edy)\nSupersonic(edy)\nLivelong(waine)\nXlii(charlene)\nforall x (Retrorse(x) and Livelong(x) -> Xlii(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) and Xlii(x) -> Fenestral(x))\nforall x (Livelong(x) -> Retrorse(x))\n\nRetrorse(waine)\n\nLivelong(waine) and forall x (Livelong(x) -> Retrorse(x)) -> therefore Retrorse(waine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Hayden is overladen. Hayden is stentorian. Hayden is misbegot. Hayden is cliched. Hayden is piebald. Leonerd is stentorian. Vena is weaponless. If someone is mucous and stentorian then they are weaponless. All stentorian, weaponless people are misbegot. Furry people are mucous. Leonerd is not mucous.", "logic": "\nOverladen(hayden)\nStentorian(hayden)\nMisbegot(hayden)\nCliched(hayden)\nPiebald(hayden)\nStentorian(leonerd)\nWeaponless(vena)\nforall x (Mucous(x) and Stentorian(x) -> Weaponless(x))\nforall x (Stentorian(x) and Weaponless(x) -> Misbegot(x))\nforall x (Stentorian(x) -> Mucous(x))\n\nnot Mucous(leonerd)\n\nStentorian(leonerd) and forall x (Stentorian(x) -> Mucous(x)) -> therefore Mucous(leonerd)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Jan is concealing. Jan is appetitive. Jan is spatial. Jan is handsewn. Jan is intimal. Quigman is appetitive. Maryellen is uneconomic. If someone is credited and appetitive then they are uneconomic. All appetitive, uneconomic people are spatial. Furry people are credited. Jan is uneconomic.", "logic": "\nConcealing(jan)\nAppetitive(jan)\nSpatial(jan)\nHandsewn(jan)\nIntimal(jan)\nAppetitive(quigman)\nUneconomic(maryellen)\nforall x (Credited(x) and Appetitive(x) -> Uneconomic(x))\nforall x (Appetitive(x) and Uneconomic(x) -> Spatial(x))\nforall x (Appetitive(x) -> Credited(x))\n\nUneconomic(jan)\n\nAppetitive(jan) and forall x (Appetitive(x) -> Credited(x)) -> therefore Credited(jan) Credited(jan) and Appetitive(jan) and forall x (Credited(x) and Appetitive(x) -> Uneconomic(x)) -> therefore Uneconomic(jan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Tiffanie is sonic. Tiffanie is queasy. Tiffanie is molded. Tiffanie is amitotic. Tiffanie is picky. Engracia is queasy. Luis is balconied. If someone is nightly and queasy then they are balconied. All queasy, balconied people are molded. Furry people are nightly. Engracia is not balconied.", "logic": "\nSonic(tiffanie)\nQueasy(tiffanie)\nMolded(tiffanie)\nAmitotic(tiffanie)\nPicky(tiffanie)\nQueasy(engracia)\nBalconied(luis)\nforall x (Nightly(x) and Queasy(x) -> Balconied(x))\nforall x (Queasy(x) and Balconied(x) -> Molded(x))\nforall x (Queasy(x) -> Nightly(x))\n\nnot Balconied(engracia)\n\nQueasy(engracia) and forall x (Queasy(x) -> Nightly(x)) -> therefore Nightly(engracia) Nightly(engracia) and Queasy(engracia) and forall x (Nightly(x) and Queasy(x) -> Balconied(x)) -> therefore Balconied(engracia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Berty is scheduled. Berty is nicaraguan. Berty is amazing. Berty is overgreedy. Berty is unrequited. Diandra is nicaraguan. Corry is polish. If someone is nutlike and nicaraguan then they are polish. All nicaraguan, polish people are amazing. Furry people are nutlike. Diandra is amazing.", "logic": "\nScheduled(berty)\nNicaraguan(berty)\nAmazing(berty)\nOvergreedy(berty)\nUnrequited(berty)\nNicaraguan(diandra)\nPolish(corry)\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Nicaraguan(x) -> Polish(x))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) and Polish(x) -> Amazing(x))\nforall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Nutlike(x))\n\nAmazing(diandra)\n\nNicaraguan(diandra) and forall x (Nicaraguan(x) -> Nutlike(x)) -> therefore Nutlike(diandra) Nutlike(diandra) and Nicaraguan(diandra) and forall x (Nutlike(x) and Nicaraguan(x) -> Polish(x)) -> therefore Polish(diandra) Nicaraguan(diandra) and Polish(diandra) and forall x (Nicaraguan(x) and Polish(x) -> Amazing(x)) -> therefore Amazing(diandra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Gideon is combative. Gideon is foaming. Gideon is upstage. Gideon is lithuanian. Gideon is dread. Town is foaming. Dorella is needled. If someone is gracile and foaming then they are needled. All foaming, needled people are upstage. Furry people are gracile. Town is not upstage.", "logic": "\nCombative(gideon)\nFoaming(gideon)\nUpstage(gideon)\nLithuanian(gideon)\nDread(gideon)\nFoaming(town)\nNeedled(dorella)\nforall x (Gracile(x) and Foaming(x) -> Needled(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) and Needled(x) -> Upstage(x))\nforall x (Foaming(x) -> Gracile(x))\n\nnot Upstage(town)\n\nFoaming(town) and forall x (Foaming(x) -> Gracile(x)) -> therefore Gracile(town) Gracile(town) and Foaming(town) and forall x (Gracile(x) and Foaming(x) -> Needled(x)) -> therefore Needled(town) Foaming(town) and Needled(town) and forall x (Foaming(x) and Needled(x) -> Upstage(x)) -> therefore Upstage(town)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Hannie is unhallowed. Hannie is ripping. Hannie is hoofed. Hannie is appeasing. Hannie is globose. Shanda is ripping. Delphina is icteric. If someone is legitimate and ripping then they are icteric. All ripping, icteric people are hoofed. Furry people are legitimate. Delphina is not legitimate.", "logic": "\nUnhallowed(hannie)\nRipping(hannie)\nHoofed(hannie)\nAppeasing(hannie)\nGlobose(hannie)\nRipping(shanda)\nIcteric(delphina)\nforall x (Legitimate(x) and Ripping(x) -> Icteric(x))\nforall x (Ripping(x) and Icteric(x) -> Hoofed(x))\nforall x (Ripping(x) -> Legitimate(x))\n\nnot Legitimate(delphina)\n\nforall x (Ripping(x) -> Legitimate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Valry is brocaded. Valry is curious. Valry is pandurate. Valry is miasmic. Valry is knobby. Hazel is curious. Hephzibah is neuralgic. If someone is ransomed and curious then they are neuralgic. All curious, neuralgic people are pandurate. Furry people are ransomed. Hephzibah is pandurate.", "logic": "\nBrocaded(valry)\nCurious(valry)\nPandurate(valry)\nMiasmic(valry)\nKnobby(valry)\nCurious(hazel)\nNeuralgic(hephzibah)\nforall x (Ransomed(x) and Curious(x) -> Neuralgic(x))\nforall x (Curious(x) and Neuralgic(x) -> Pandurate(x))\nforall x (Curious(x) -> Ransomed(x))\n\nPandurate(hephzibah)\n\nforall x (Curious(x) and Neuralgic(x) -> Pandurate(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "King is contrite. King is gummy. King is parasitic. King is dandy. King is acquitted. Wenona is gummy. Roni is early. If someone is obliged and gummy then they are early. All gummy, early people are parasitic. Furry people are obliged. Wenona is not dandy.", "logic": "\nContrite(king)\nGummy(king)\nParasitic(king)\nDandy(king)\nAcquitted(king)\nGummy(wenona)\nEarly(roni)\nforall x (Obliged(x) and Gummy(x) -> Early(x))\nforall x (Gummy(x) and Early(x) -> Parasitic(x))\nforall x (Gummy(x) -> Obliged(x))\n\nnot Dandy(wenona)\n\nnot Dandy(wenona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Stevena is troubling. Stevena is hopeless. Stevena is monogenic. Stevena is biaxial. Stevena is hysteric. Zabrina is hopeless. Cyril is moravian. If someone is violated and hopeless then they are moravian. All hopeless, moravian people are monogenic. Furry people are violated. Zabrina is hysteric.", "logic": "\nTroubling(stevena)\nHopeless(stevena)\nMonogenic(stevena)\nBiaxial(stevena)\nHysteric(stevena)\nHopeless(zabrina)\nMoravian(cyril)\nforall x (Violated(x) and Hopeless(x) -> Moravian(x))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) and Moravian(x) -> Monogenic(x))\nforall x (Hopeless(x) -> Violated(x))\n\nHysteric(zabrina)\n\nHysteric(zabrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Winford is midmost. Winford is touristed. Winford is connubial. Winford is emollient. Winford is acceptable. Hertha is touristed. Hyman is catholic. If someone is eulogistic and touristed then they are catholic. All touristed, catholic people are connubial. Furry people are eulogistic. Hyman is not emollient.", "logic": "\nMidmost(winford)\nTouristed(winford)\nConnubial(winford)\nEmollient(winford)\nAcceptable(winford)\nTouristed(hertha)\nCatholic(hyman)\nforall x (Eulogistic(x) and Touristed(x) -> Catholic(x))\nforall x (Touristed(x) and Catholic(x) -> Connubial(x))\nforall x (Touristed(x) -> Eulogistic(x))\n\nnot Emollient(hyman)\n\nnot Emollient(hyman) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Moe is straight. Moe is aural. Moe is oleophilic. Moe is myotonic. Moe is athirst. Zorine is aural. Dyan is designate. If someone is parented and aural then they are designate. All aural, designate people are oleophilic. Furry people are parented. Dyan is athirst.", "logic": "\nStraight(moe)\nAural(moe)\nOleophilic(moe)\nMyotonic(moe)\nAthirst(moe)\nAural(zorine)\nDesignate(dyan)\nforall x (Parented(x) and Aural(x) -> Designate(x))\nforall x (Aural(x) and Designate(x) -> Oleophilic(x))\nforall x (Aural(x) -> Parented(x))\n\nAthirst(dyan)\n\nAthirst(dyan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Rice is delphian. Rice is apathetic. Rice is forehand. Rice is demoniacal. Rice is lumbar. Isadore is apathetic. Bartel is homegrown. If someone is confiding and apathetic then they are homegrown. All apathetic, homegrown people are forehand. Furry people are confiding. Bartel is not apathetic.", "logic": "\nDelphian(rice)\nApathetic(rice)\nForehand(rice)\nDemoniacal(rice)\nLumbar(rice)\nApathetic(isadore)\nHomegrown(bartel)\nforall x (Confiding(x) and Apathetic(x) -> Homegrown(x))\nforall x (Apathetic(x) and Homegrown(x) -> Forehand(x))\nforall x (Apathetic(x) -> Confiding(x))\n\nnot Apathetic(bartel)\n\nnot Apathetic(bartel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Yardley is segregated. Yardley is afraid. Yardley is fifth. Yardley is unjust. Yardley is brainy. Cybal is afraid. Corny is galling. If someone is skintight and afraid then they are galling. All afraid, galling people are fifth. Furry people are skintight. Cybal is segregated.", "logic": "\nSegregated(yardley)\nAfraid(yardley)\nFifth(yardley)\nUnjust(yardley)\nBrainy(yardley)\nAfraid(cybal)\nGalling(corny)\nforall x (Skintight(x) and Afraid(x) -> Galling(x))\nforall x (Afraid(x) and Galling(x) -> Fifth(x))\nforall x (Afraid(x) -> Skintight(x))\n\nSegregated(cybal)\n\nSegregated(cybal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-86"} {"premises": "Ulysses is contraband. Ulysses is qabalistic. Ulysses is backless. If Ulysses is qabalistic then Ulysses is starchy. Big, bivalve things are unbiassed. All bivalve things are starchy. All unbiassed, qabalistic things are backless. If something is backless then it is contraband. If something is becoming and backless then it is bivalve. If something is backless and qabalistic then it is starchy. Big things are becoming. Ulysses is contraband.", "logic": "\nContraband(ulysses)\nQabalistic(ulysses)\nBackless(ulysses)\nQabalistic(ulysses) -> Starchy(ulysses)\nforall x (Starchy(x) and Bivalve(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Bivalve(x) -> Starchy(x))\nforall x (Unbiassed(x) and Qabalistic(x) -> Backless(x))\nforall x (Backless(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Becoming(x) and Backless(x) -> Bivalve(x))\nforall x (Backless(x) and Qabalistic(x) -> Starchy(x))\nforall x (Starchy(x) -> Becoming(x))\n\nContraband(ulysses)\n\ntherefore Contraband(ulysses)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Friedrich is rheumatoid. Friedrich is equatorial. Friedrich is ibsenian. If Friedrich is equatorial then Friedrich is roofless. Big, improvised things are overfond. All improvised things are roofless. All overfond, equatorial things are ibsenian. If something is ibsenian then it is rheumatoid. If something is inductive and ibsenian then it is improvised. If something is ibsenian and equatorial then it is roofless. Big things are inductive. Friedrich is not rheumatoid.", "logic": "\nRheumatoid(friedrich)\nEquatorial(friedrich)\nIbsenian(friedrich)\nEquatorial(friedrich) -> Roofless(friedrich)\nforall x (Roofless(x) and Improvised(x) -> Overfond(x))\nforall x (Improvised(x) -> Roofless(x))\nforall x (Overfond(x) and Equatorial(x) -> Ibsenian(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) -> Rheumatoid(x))\nforall x (Inductive(x) and Ibsenian(x) -> Improvised(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) and Equatorial(x) -> Roofless(x))\nforall x (Roofless(x) -> Inductive(x))\n\nnot Rheumatoid(friedrich)\n\ntherefore Rheumatoid(friedrich)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Talya is ranging. Talya is waterworn. Talya is dreary. If Talya is waterworn then Talya is offsides. Big, nether things are impassable. All nether things are offsides. All impassable, waterworn things are dreary. If something is dreary then it is ranging. If something is churlish and dreary then it is nether. If something is dreary and waterworn then it is offsides. Big things are churlish. Talya is offsides.", "logic": "\nRanging(talya)\nWaterworn(talya)\nDreary(talya)\nWaterworn(talya) -> Offsides(talya)\nforall x (Offsides(x) and Nether(x) -> Impassable(x))\nforall x (Nether(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Impassable(x) and Waterworn(x) -> Dreary(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) -> Ranging(x))\nforall x (Churlish(x) and Dreary(x) -> Nether(x))\nforall x (Dreary(x) and Waterworn(x) -> Offsides(x))\nforall x (Offsides(x) -> Churlish(x))\n\nOffsides(talya)\n\nWaterworn(talya) and Waterworn(talya) -> Offsides(talya) -> therefore Offsides(talya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Christen is anthropoid. Christen is surd. Christen is axile. If Christen is surd then Christen is sericeous. Big, endangered things are aflare. All endangered things are sericeous. All aflare, surd things are axile. If something is axile then it is anthropoid. If something is paradisiac and axile then it is endangered. If something is axile and surd then it is sericeous. Big things are paradisiac. Christen is not sericeous.", "logic": "\nAnthropoid(christen)\nSurd(christen)\nAxile(christen)\nSurd(christen) -> Sericeous(christen)\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Endangered(x) -> Aflare(x))\nforall x (Endangered(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Aflare(x) and Surd(x) -> Axile(x))\nforall x (Axile(x) -> Anthropoid(x))\nforall x (Paradisiac(x) and Axile(x) -> Endangered(x))\nforall x (Axile(x) and Surd(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) -> Paradisiac(x))\n\nnot Sericeous(christen)\n\nSurd(christen) and Surd(christen) -> Sericeous(christen) -> therefore Sericeous(christen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Michail is interstate. Michail is main. Michail is isomeric. If Michail is main then Michail is soggy. Big, diestrous things are hairlike. All diestrous things are soggy. All hairlike, main things are isomeric. If something is isomeric then it is interstate. If something is dire and isomeric then it is diestrous. If something is isomeric and main then it is soggy. Big things are dire. Michail is dire.", "logic": "\nInterstate(michail)\nMain(michail)\nIsomeric(michail)\nMain(michail) -> Soggy(michail)\nforall x (Soggy(x) and Diestrous(x) -> Hairlike(x))\nforall x (Diestrous(x) -> Soggy(x))\nforall x (Hairlike(x) and Main(x) -> Isomeric(x))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) -> Interstate(x))\nforall x (Dire(x) and Isomeric(x) -> Diestrous(x))\nforall x (Isomeric(x) and Main(x) -> Soggy(x))\nforall x (Soggy(x) -> Dire(x))\n\nDire(michail)\n\nMain(michail) and Main(michail) -> Soggy(michail) -> therefore Soggy(michail) Soggy(michail) and forall x (Soggy(x) -> Dire(x)) -> therefore Dire(michail)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Pierce is glued. Pierce is exegetical. Pierce is dialectal. If Pierce is exegetical then Pierce is anxiolytic. Big, held things are outrageous. All held things are anxiolytic. All outrageous, exegetical things are dialectal. If something is dialectal then it is glued. If something is polyphonic and dialectal then it is held. If something is dialectal and exegetical then it is anxiolytic. Big things are polyphonic. Pierce is not polyphonic.", "logic": "\nGlued(pierce)\nExegetical(pierce)\nDialectal(pierce)\nExegetical(pierce) -> Anxiolytic(pierce)\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) and Held(x) -> Outrageous(x))\nforall x (Held(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Outrageous(x) and Exegetical(x) -> Dialectal(x))\nforall x (Dialectal(x) -> Glued(x))\nforall x (Polyphonic(x) and Dialectal(x) -> Held(x))\nforall x (Dialectal(x) and Exegetical(x) -> Anxiolytic(x))\nforall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\n\nnot Polyphonic(pierce)\n\nExegetical(pierce) and Exegetical(pierce) -> Anxiolytic(pierce) -> therefore Anxiolytic(pierce) Anxiolytic(pierce) and forall x (Anxiolytic(x) -> Polyphonic(x)) -> therefore Polyphonic(pierce)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Hetti is raiseable. Hetti is swazi. Hetti is acerose. If Hetti is swazi then Hetti is opthalmic. Big, unready things are gooey. All unready things are opthalmic. All gooey, swazi things are acerose. If something is acerose then it is raiseable. If something is unspotted and acerose then it is unready. If something is acerose and swazi then it is opthalmic. Big things are unspotted. Hetti is unready.", "logic": "\nRaiseable(hetti)\nSwazi(hetti)\nAcerose(hetti)\nSwazi(hetti) -> Opthalmic(hetti)\nforall x (Opthalmic(x) and Unready(x) -> Gooey(x))\nforall x (Unready(x) -> Opthalmic(x))\nforall x (Gooey(x) and Swazi(x) -> Acerose(x))\nforall x (Acerose(x) -> Raiseable(x))\nforall x (Unspotted(x) and Acerose(x) -> Unready(x))\nforall x (Acerose(x) and Swazi(x) -> Opthalmic(x))\nforall x (Opthalmic(x) -> Unspotted(x))\n\nUnready(hetti)\n\nSwazi(hetti) and Swazi(hetti) -> Opthalmic(hetti) -> therefore Opthalmic(hetti) Opthalmic(hetti) and forall x (Opthalmic(x) -> Unspotted(x)) -> therefore Unspotted(hetti) Unspotted(hetti) and Acerose(hetti) and forall x (Unspotted(x) and Acerose(x) -> Unready(x)) -> therefore Unready(hetti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Consuela is subgross. Consuela is incumbent. Consuela is possessed. If Consuela is incumbent then Consuela is flexible. Big, caulescent things are albinotic. All caulescent things are flexible. All albinotic, incumbent things are possessed. If something is possessed then it is subgross. If something is loutish and possessed then it is caulescent. If something is possessed and incumbent then it is flexible. Big things are loutish. Consuela is not caulescent.", "logic": "\nSubgross(consuela)\nIncumbent(consuela)\nPossessed(consuela)\nIncumbent(consuela) -> Flexible(consuela)\nforall x (Flexible(x) and Caulescent(x) -> Albinotic(x))\nforall x (Caulescent(x) -> Flexible(x))\nforall x (Albinotic(x) and Incumbent(x) -> Possessed(x))\nforall x (Possessed(x) -> Subgross(x))\nforall x (Loutish(x) and Possessed(x) -> Caulescent(x))\nforall x (Possessed(x) and Incumbent(x) -> Flexible(x))\nforall x (Flexible(x) -> Loutish(x))\n\nnot Caulescent(consuela)\n\nIncumbent(consuela) and Incumbent(consuela) -> Flexible(consuela) -> therefore Flexible(consuela) Flexible(consuela) and forall x (Flexible(x) -> Loutish(x)) -> therefore Loutish(consuela) Loutish(consuela) and Possessed(consuela) and forall x (Loutish(x) and Possessed(x) -> Caulescent(x)) -> therefore Caulescent(consuela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-516"} {"premises": "Gray is shared. Gray is resounding. Gray is unbiased. White, alkylic things are contorted. All alkylic things are unbiased. All contorted things are dateless. Rough, unbiased things are shared. If something is dateless then it is resounding. All alkylic, semipublic things are dateless. All shared, dateless things are contorted. If something is resounding then it is alkylic. Gray is unbiased.", "logic": "\nShared(gray)\nResounding(gray)\nUnbiased(gray)\nforall x (Unbiased(x) and Alkylic(x) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) -> Unbiased(x))\nforall x (Contorted(x) -> Dateless(x))\nforall x (Dateless(x) and Unbiased(x) -> Shared(x))\nforall x (Dateless(x) -> Resounding(x))\nforall x (Alkylic(x) and Semipublic(x) -> Dateless(x))\nforall x (Shared(x) and Dateless(x) -> Contorted(x))\nforall x (Resounding(x) -> Alkylic(x))\n\nUnbiased(gray)\n\ntherefore Unbiased(gray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Reube is basaltic. Reube is crenulate. Reube is muscovite. White, hedonic things are xcvi. All hedonic things are muscovite. All xcvi things are patellar. Rough, muscovite things are basaltic. If something is patellar then it is crenulate. All hedonic, scoreless things are patellar. All basaltic, patellar things are xcvi. If something is crenulate then it is hedonic. Reube is not basaltic.", "logic": "\nBasaltic(reube)\nCrenulate(reube)\nMuscovite(reube)\nforall x (Muscovite(x) and Hedonic(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) -> Muscovite(x))\nforall x (Xcvi(x) -> Patellar(x))\nforall x (Patellar(x) and Muscovite(x) -> Basaltic(x))\nforall x (Patellar(x) -> Crenulate(x))\nforall x (Hedonic(x) and Scoreless(x) -> Patellar(x))\nforall x (Basaltic(x) and Patellar(x) -> Xcvi(x))\nforall x (Crenulate(x) -> Hedonic(x))\n\nnot Basaltic(reube)\n\ntherefore Basaltic(reube)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Cynthy is rancorous. Cynthy is spendable. Cynthy is azure. White, plebeian things are rationed. All plebeian things are azure. All rationed things are stepwise. Rough, azure things are rancorous. If something is stepwise then it is spendable. All plebeian, absorbable things are stepwise. All rancorous, stepwise things are rationed. If something is spendable then it is plebeian. Cynthy is plebeian.", "logic": "\nRancorous(cynthy)\nSpendable(cynthy)\nAzure(cynthy)\nforall x (Azure(x) and Plebeian(x) -> Rationed(x))\nforall x (Plebeian(x) -> Azure(x))\nforall x (Rationed(x) -> Stepwise(x))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) and Azure(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Stepwise(x) -> Spendable(x))\nforall x (Plebeian(x) and Absorbable(x) -> Stepwise(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) and Stepwise(x) -> Rationed(x))\nforall x (Spendable(x) -> Plebeian(x))\n\nPlebeian(cynthy)\n\nSpendable(cynthy) and forall x (Spendable(x) -> Plebeian(x)) -> therefore Plebeian(cynthy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Gerrard is variegated. Gerrard is fistulate. Gerrard is honored. White, profitless things are unliveable. All profitless things are honored. All unliveable things are orangish. Rough, honored things are variegated. If something is orangish then it is fistulate. All profitless, slapstick things are orangish. All variegated, orangish things are unliveable. If something is fistulate then it is profitless. Gerrard is not profitless.", "logic": "\nVariegated(gerrard)\nFistulate(gerrard)\nHonored(gerrard)\nforall x (Honored(x) and Profitless(x) -> Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Profitless(x) -> Honored(x))\nforall x (Unliveable(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Orangish(x) and Honored(x) -> Variegated(x))\nforall x (Orangish(x) -> Fistulate(x))\nforall x (Profitless(x) and Slapstick(x) -> Orangish(x))\nforall x (Variegated(x) and Orangish(x) -> Unliveable(x))\nforall x (Fistulate(x) -> Profitless(x))\n\nnot Profitless(gerrard)\n\nFistulate(gerrard) and forall x (Fistulate(x) -> Profitless(x)) -> therefore Profitless(gerrard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Bette is continent. Bette is lobed. Bette is squelched. White, easterly things are innermost. All easterly things are squelched. All innermost things are naughty. Rough, squelched things are continent. If something is naughty then it is lobed. All easterly, hemolytic things are naughty. All continent, naughty things are innermost. If something is lobed then it is easterly. Bette is innermost.", "logic": "\nContinent(bette)\nLobed(bette)\nSquelched(bette)\nforall x (Squelched(x) and Easterly(x) -> Innermost(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) -> Squelched(x))\nforall x (Innermost(x) -> Naughty(x))\nforall x (Naughty(x) and Squelched(x) -> Continent(x))\nforall x (Naughty(x) -> Lobed(x))\nforall x (Easterly(x) and Hemolytic(x) -> Naughty(x))\nforall x (Continent(x) and Naughty(x) -> Innermost(x))\nforall x (Lobed(x) -> Easterly(x))\n\nInnermost(bette)\n\nLobed(bette) and forall x (Lobed(x) -> Easterly(x)) -> therefore Easterly(bette) Squelched(bette) and Easterly(bette) and forall x (Squelched(x) and Easterly(x) -> Innermost(x)) -> therefore Innermost(bette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Dulcinea is rejected. Dulcinea is calm. Dulcinea is acquired. White, fulgurous things are apodeictic. All fulgurous things are acquired. All apodeictic things are hibernal. Rough, acquired things are rejected. If something is hibernal then it is calm. All fulgurous, torn things are hibernal. All rejected, hibernal things are apodeictic. If something is calm then it is fulgurous. Dulcinea is not apodeictic.", "logic": "\nRejected(dulcinea)\nCalm(dulcinea)\nAcquired(dulcinea)\nforall x (Acquired(x) and Fulgurous(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) -> Acquired(x))\nforall x (Apodeictic(x) -> Hibernal(x))\nforall x (Hibernal(x) and Acquired(x) -> Rejected(x))\nforall x (Hibernal(x) -> Calm(x))\nforall x (Fulgurous(x) and Torn(x) -> Hibernal(x))\nforall x (Rejected(x) and Hibernal(x) -> Apodeictic(x))\nforall x (Calm(x) -> Fulgurous(x))\n\nnot Apodeictic(dulcinea)\n\nCalm(dulcinea) and forall x (Calm(x) -> Fulgurous(x)) -> therefore Fulgurous(dulcinea) Acquired(dulcinea) and Fulgurous(dulcinea) and forall x (Acquired(x) and Fulgurous(x) -> Apodeictic(x)) -> therefore Apodeictic(dulcinea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Selma is ovine. Selma is persian. Selma is verified. White, filthy things are roughshod. All filthy things are verified. All roughshod things are ampullar. Rough, verified things are ovine. If something is ampullar then it is persian. All filthy, botched things are ampullar. All ovine, ampullar things are roughshod. If something is persian then it is filthy. Selma is ampullar.", "logic": "\nOvine(selma)\nPersian(selma)\nVerified(selma)\nforall x (Verified(x) and Filthy(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) -> Verified(x))\nforall x (Roughshod(x) -> Ampullar(x))\nforall x (Ampullar(x) and Verified(x) -> Ovine(x))\nforall x (Ampullar(x) -> Persian(x))\nforall x (Filthy(x) and Botched(x) -> Ampullar(x))\nforall x (Ovine(x) and Ampullar(x) -> Roughshod(x))\nforall x (Persian(x) -> Filthy(x))\n\nAmpullar(selma)\n\nPersian(selma) and forall x (Persian(x) -> Filthy(x)) -> therefore Filthy(selma) Verified(selma) and Filthy(selma) and forall x (Verified(x) and Filthy(x) -> Roughshod(x)) -> therefore Roughshod(selma) Roughshod(selma) and forall x (Roughshod(x) -> Ampullar(x)) -> therefore Ampullar(selma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Morly is hegelian. Morly is penciled. Morly is abdicable. White, nervous things are slavish. All nervous things are abdicable. All slavish things are transeunt. Rough, abdicable things are hegelian. If something is transeunt then it is penciled. All nervous, palpatory things are transeunt. All hegelian, transeunt things are slavish. If something is penciled then it is nervous. Morly is not transeunt.", "logic": "\nHegelian(morly)\nPenciled(morly)\nAbdicable(morly)\nforall x (Abdicable(x) and Nervous(x) -> Slavish(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) -> Abdicable(x))\nforall x (Slavish(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nforall x (Transeunt(x) and Abdicable(x) -> Hegelian(x))\nforall x (Transeunt(x) -> Penciled(x))\nforall x (Nervous(x) and Palpatory(x) -> Transeunt(x))\nforall x (Hegelian(x) and Transeunt(x) -> Slavish(x))\nforall x (Penciled(x) -> Nervous(x))\n\nnot Transeunt(morly)\n\nPenciled(morly) and forall x (Penciled(x) -> Nervous(x)) -> therefore Nervous(morly) Abdicable(morly) and Nervous(morly) and forall x (Abdicable(x) and Nervous(x) -> Slavish(x)) -> therefore Slavish(morly) Slavish(morly) and forall x (Slavish(x) -> Transeunt(x)) -> therefore Transeunt(morly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-766"} {"premises": "Nevile is not overawed. Nevile is patronised. Nevile is forty. Nevile is vivace. Shawn is patronised. Sylvie is not marian. Ettie is marian. Young people are forty. All overawed people are not patronised. All breezy, patronised people are pathless. If Nevile is breezy then Nevile is forty. All marian, pathless people are breezy. All vivace people are breezy. If Sylvie is vivace and Sylvie is not patronised then Sylvie is pathless. All pathless people are not marian. Nevile is patronised.", "logic": "\nnot Overawed(nevile)\nPatronised(nevile)\nForty(nevile)\nVivace(nevile)\nPatronised(shawn)\nnot Marian(sylvie)\nMarian(ettie)\nforall x (Vivace(x) -> Forty(x))\nforall x (Overawed(x) -> not Patronised(x))\nforall x (Breezy(x) and Patronised(x) -> Pathless(x))\nBreezy(nevile) -> Forty(nevile)\nforall x (Marian(x) and Pathless(x) -> Breezy(x))\nforall x (Vivace(x) -> Breezy(x))\nVivace(sylvie) and not Patronised(sylvie) -> Pathless(sylvie)\nforall x (Pathless(x) -> not Marian(x))\n\nPatronised(nevile)\n\ntherefore Patronised(nevile)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Redmond is not rescued. Redmond is incomplete. Redmond is homostylic. Redmond is delphic. Filia is incomplete. Livia is not hipless. Cornie is hipless. Young people are homostylic. All rescued people are not incomplete. All governable, incomplete people are false. If Redmond is governable then Redmond is homostylic. All hipless, false people are governable. All delphic people are governable. If Livia is delphic and Livia is not incomplete then Livia is false. All false people are not hipless. Redmond is not delphic.", "logic": "\nnot Rescued(redmond)\nIncomplete(redmond)\nHomostylic(redmond)\nDelphic(redmond)\nIncomplete(filia)\nnot Hipless(livia)\nHipless(cornie)\nforall x (Delphic(x) -> Homostylic(x))\nforall x (Rescued(x) -> not Incomplete(x))\nforall x (Governable(x) and Incomplete(x) -> False(x))\nGovernable(redmond) -> Homostylic(redmond)\nforall x (Hipless(x) and False(x) -> Governable(x))\nforall x (Delphic(x) -> Governable(x))\nDelphic(livia) and not Incomplete(livia) -> False(livia)\nforall x (False(x) -> not Hipless(x))\n\nnot Delphic(redmond)\n\ntherefore Delphic(redmond)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Jeffie is not getable. Jeffie is outlaw. Jeffie is pupillary. Jeffie is gauche. Mack is outlaw. Flemming is not closed. Jules is closed. Young people are pupillary. All getable people are not outlaw. All oleophobic, outlaw people are hearsay. If Jeffie is oleophobic then Jeffie is pupillary. All closed, hearsay people are oleophobic. All gauche people are oleophobic. If Flemming is gauche and Flemming is not outlaw then Flemming is hearsay. All hearsay people are not closed. Jeffie is oleophobic.", "logic": "\nnot Getable(jeffie)\nOutlaw(jeffie)\nPupillary(jeffie)\nGauche(jeffie)\nOutlaw(mack)\nnot Closed(flemming)\nClosed(jules)\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Pupillary(x))\nforall x (Getable(x) -> not Outlaw(x))\nforall x (Oleophobic(x) and Outlaw(x) -> Hearsay(x))\nOleophobic(jeffie) -> Pupillary(jeffie)\nforall x (Closed(x) and Hearsay(x) -> Oleophobic(x))\nforall x (Gauche(x) -> Oleophobic(x))\nGauche(flemming) and not Outlaw(flemming) -> Hearsay(flemming)\nforall x (Hearsay(x) -> not Closed(x))\n\nOleophobic(jeffie)\n\nGauche(jeffie) and forall x (Gauche(x) -> Oleophobic(x)) -> therefore Oleophobic(jeffie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Emmery is not howling. Emmery is passee. Emmery is blooded. Emmery is demagogic. Wye is passee. Annabela is not malleable. Giordano is malleable. Young people are blooded. All howling people are not passee. All smiling, passee people are nonvisual. If Emmery is smiling then Emmery is blooded. All malleable, nonvisual people are smiling. All demagogic people are smiling. If Annabela is demagogic and Annabela is not passee then Annabela is nonvisual. All nonvisual people are not malleable. Emmery is not smiling.", "logic": "\nnot Howling(emmery)\nPassee(emmery)\nBlooded(emmery)\nDemagogic(emmery)\nPassee(wye)\nnot Malleable(annabela)\nMalleable(giordano)\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Blooded(x))\nforall x (Howling(x) -> not Passee(x))\nforall x (Smiling(x) and Passee(x) -> Nonvisual(x))\nSmiling(emmery) -> Blooded(emmery)\nforall x (Malleable(x) and Nonvisual(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Smiling(x))\nDemagogic(annabela) and not Passee(annabela) -> Nonvisual(annabela)\nforall x (Nonvisual(x) -> not Malleable(x))\n\nnot Smiling(emmery)\n\nDemagogic(emmery) and forall x (Demagogic(x) -> Smiling(x)) -> therefore Smiling(emmery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Fabrianne is not briny. Fabrianne is haematal. Fabrianne is unshadowed. Fabrianne is summery. Samuella is haematal. Sibel is not uppercase. Aggie is uppercase. Young people are unshadowed. All briny people are not haematal. All iodised, haematal people are muffled. If Fabrianne is iodised then Fabrianne is unshadowed. All uppercase, muffled people are iodised. All summery people are iodised. If Sibel is summery and Sibel is not haematal then Sibel is muffled. All muffled people are not uppercase. Fabrianne is muffled.", "logic": "\nnot Briny(fabrianne)\nHaematal(fabrianne)\nUnshadowed(fabrianne)\nSummery(fabrianne)\nHaematal(samuella)\nnot Uppercase(sibel)\nUppercase(aggie)\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Unshadowed(x))\nforall x (Briny(x) -> not Haematal(x))\nforall x (Iodised(x) and Haematal(x) -> Muffled(x))\nIodised(fabrianne) -> Unshadowed(fabrianne)\nforall x (Uppercase(x) and Muffled(x) -> Iodised(x))\nforall x (Summery(x) -> Iodised(x))\nSummery(sibel) and not Haematal(sibel) -> Muffled(sibel)\nforall x (Muffled(x) -> not Uppercase(x))\n\nMuffled(fabrianne)\n\nSummery(fabrianne) and forall x (Summery(x) -> Iodised(x)) -> therefore Iodised(fabrianne) Iodised(fabrianne) and Haematal(fabrianne) and forall x (Iodised(x) and Haematal(x) -> Muffled(x)) -> therefore Muffled(fabrianne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Gershon is not moated. Gershon is pillaged. Gershon is patchy. Gershon is arboresque. Gilberta is pillaged. Monica is not berried. Lowell is berried. Young people are patchy. All moated people are not pillaged. All thenal, pillaged people are decimal. If Gershon is thenal then Gershon is patchy. All berried, decimal people are thenal. All arboresque people are thenal. If Monica is arboresque and Monica is not pillaged then Monica is decimal. All decimal people are not berried. Gershon is not decimal.", "logic": "\nnot Moated(gershon)\nPillaged(gershon)\nPatchy(gershon)\nArboresque(gershon)\nPillaged(gilberta)\nnot Berried(monica)\nBerried(lowell)\nforall x (Arboresque(x) -> Patchy(x))\nforall x (Moated(x) -> not Pillaged(x))\nforall x (Thenal(x) and Pillaged(x) -> Decimal(x))\nThenal(gershon) -> Patchy(gershon)\nforall x (Berried(x) and Decimal(x) -> Thenal(x))\nforall x (Arboresque(x) -> Thenal(x))\nArboresque(monica) and not Pillaged(monica) -> Decimal(monica)\nforall x (Decimal(x) -> not Berried(x))\n\nnot Decimal(gershon)\n\nArboresque(gershon) and forall x (Arboresque(x) -> Thenal(x)) -> therefore Thenal(gershon) Thenal(gershon) and Pillaged(gershon) and forall x (Thenal(x) and Pillaged(x) -> Decimal(x)) -> therefore Decimal(gershon)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Pam is not emergent. Pam is perigonal. Pam is arboresque. Pam is melting. Madelle is perigonal. Phedra is not beauteous. Sauncho is beauteous. Young people are arboresque. All emergent people are not perigonal. All seventieth, perigonal people are undismayed. If Pam is seventieth then Pam is arboresque. All beauteous, undismayed people are seventieth. All melting people are seventieth. If Phedra is melting and Phedra is not perigonal then Phedra is undismayed. All undismayed people are not beauteous. Pam is not beauteous.", "logic": "\nnot Emergent(pam)\nPerigonal(pam)\nArboresque(pam)\nMelting(pam)\nPerigonal(madelle)\nnot Beauteous(phedra)\nBeauteous(sauncho)\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Arboresque(x))\nforall x (Emergent(x) -> not Perigonal(x))\nforall x (Seventieth(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Undismayed(x))\nSeventieth(pam) -> Arboresque(pam)\nforall x (Beauteous(x) and Undismayed(x) -> Seventieth(x))\nforall x (Melting(x) -> Seventieth(x))\nMelting(phedra) and not Perigonal(phedra) -> Undismayed(phedra)\nforall x (Undismayed(x) -> not Beauteous(x))\n\nnot Beauteous(pam)\n\nMelting(pam) and forall x (Melting(x) -> Seventieth(x)) -> therefore Seventieth(pam) Seventieth(pam) and Perigonal(pam) and forall x (Seventieth(x) and Perigonal(x) -> Undismayed(x)) -> therefore Undismayed(pam) Undismayed(pam) and forall x (Undismayed(x) -> not Beauteous(x)) -> therefore not Beauteous(pam)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Mindy is not indistinct. Mindy is twenty. Mindy is swish. Mindy is chylous. Mirella is twenty. Cal is not aneroid. Jammie is aneroid. Young people are swish. All indistinct people are not twenty. All granular, twenty people are crabby. If Mindy is granular then Mindy is swish. All aneroid, crabby people are granular. All chylous people are granular. If Cal is chylous and Cal is not twenty then Cal is crabby. All crabby people are not aneroid. Mindy is aneroid.", "logic": "\nnot Indistinct(mindy)\nTwenty(mindy)\nSwish(mindy)\nChylous(mindy)\nTwenty(mirella)\nnot Aneroid(cal)\nAneroid(jammie)\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Swish(x))\nforall x (Indistinct(x) -> not Twenty(x))\nforall x (Granular(x) and Twenty(x) -> Crabby(x))\nGranular(mindy) -> Swish(mindy)\nforall x (Aneroid(x) and Crabby(x) -> Granular(x))\nforall x (Chylous(x) -> Granular(x))\nChylous(cal) and not Twenty(cal) -> Crabby(cal)\nforall x (Crabby(x) -> not Aneroid(x))\n\nAneroid(mindy)\n\nChylous(mindy) and forall x (Chylous(x) -> Granular(x)) -> therefore Granular(mindy) Granular(mindy) and Twenty(mindy) and forall x (Granular(x) and Twenty(x) -> Crabby(x)) -> therefore Crabby(mindy) Crabby(mindy) and forall x (Crabby(x) -> not Aneroid(x)) -> therefore not Aneroid(mindy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Maud is not muddy. Maud is zygomatic. Maud is alacritous. Maud is separable. Ailyn is zygomatic. Andriana is not dowdy. Dulcy is dowdy. Young people are alacritous. All muddy people are not zygomatic. All mannered, zygomatic people are faded. If Maud is mannered then Maud is alacritous. All dowdy, faded people are mannered. All separable people are mannered. If Andriana is separable and Andriana is not zygomatic then Andriana is faded. All faded people are not dowdy. Ailyn is not mannered.", "logic": "\nnot Muddy(maud)\nZygomatic(maud)\nAlacritous(maud)\nSeparable(maud)\nZygomatic(ailyn)\nnot Dowdy(andriana)\nDowdy(dulcy)\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Muddy(x) -> not Zygomatic(x))\nforall x (Mannered(x) and Zygomatic(x) -> Faded(x))\nMannered(maud) -> Alacritous(maud)\nforall x (Dowdy(x) and Faded(x) -> Mannered(x))\nforall x (Separable(x) -> Mannered(x))\nSeparable(andriana) and not Zygomatic(andriana) -> Faded(andriana)\nforall x (Faded(x) -> not Dowdy(x))\n\nnot Mannered(ailyn)\n\nforall x (Dowdy(x) and Faded(x) -> Mannered(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Cariotta is not fortissimo. Cariotta is uncultured. Cariotta is enclosed. Cariotta is filar. Cecily is uncultured. Feodora is not paneled. Sig is paneled. Young people are enclosed. All fortissimo people are not uncultured. All overladen, uncultured people are adulterant. If Cariotta is overladen then Cariotta is enclosed. All paneled, adulterant people are overladen. All filar people are overladen. If Feodora is filar and Feodora is not uncultured then Feodora is adulterant. All adulterant people are not paneled. Cecily is adulterant.", "logic": "\nnot Fortissimo(cariotta)\nUncultured(cariotta)\nEnclosed(cariotta)\nFilar(cariotta)\nUncultured(cecily)\nnot Paneled(feodora)\nPaneled(sig)\nforall x (Filar(x) -> Enclosed(x))\nforall x (Fortissimo(x) -> not Uncultured(x))\nforall x (Overladen(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Adulterant(x))\nOverladen(cariotta) -> Enclosed(cariotta)\nforall x (Paneled(x) and Adulterant(x) -> Overladen(x))\nforall x (Filar(x) -> Overladen(x))\nFilar(feodora) and not Uncultured(feodora) -> Adulterant(feodora)\nforall x (Adulterant(x) -> not Paneled(x))\n\nAdulterant(cecily)\n\nforall x (Overladen(x) and Uncultured(x) -> Adulterant(x)) <- forall x (Paneled(x) and Adulterant(x) -> Overladen(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Casandra is not homostyled. Casandra is rose. Casandra is squarish. Casandra is scalelike. Muhammad is rose. Jeannine is not lxxxvi. Doralyn is lxxxvi. Young people are squarish. All homostyled people are not rose. All tonic, rose people are amitotic. If Casandra is tonic then Casandra is squarish. All lxxxvi, amitotic people are tonic. All scalelike people are tonic. If Jeannine is scalelike and Jeannine is not rose then Jeannine is amitotic. All amitotic people are not lxxxvi. Jeannine is not amitotic.", "logic": "\nnot Homostyled(casandra)\nRose(casandra)\nSquarish(casandra)\nScalelike(casandra)\nRose(muhammad)\nnot Lxxxvi(jeannine)\nLxxxvi(doralyn)\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Squarish(x))\nforall x (Homostyled(x) -> not Rose(x))\nforall x (Tonic(x) and Rose(x) -> Amitotic(x))\nTonic(casandra) -> Squarish(casandra)\nforall x (Lxxxvi(x) and Amitotic(x) -> Tonic(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Tonic(x))\nScalelike(jeannine) and not Rose(jeannine) -> Amitotic(jeannine)\nforall x (Amitotic(x) -> not Lxxxvi(x))\n\nnot Amitotic(jeannine)\n\nforall x (Tonic(x) and Rose(x) -> Amitotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Leora is not chronic. Leora is cordless. Leora is nonfissile. Leora is myriad. Ritch is cordless. Jessa is not burled. Zebulen is burled. Young people are nonfissile. All chronic people are not cordless. All hyaline, cordless people are neuralgic. If Leora is hyaline then Leora is nonfissile. All burled, neuralgic people are hyaline. All myriad people are hyaline. If Jessa is myriad and Jessa is not cordless then Jessa is neuralgic. All neuralgic people are not burled. Zebulen is nonfissile.", "logic": "\nnot Chronic(leora)\nCordless(leora)\nNonfissile(leora)\nMyriad(leora)\nCordless(ritch)\nnot Burled(jessa)\nBurled(zebulen)\nforall x (Myriad(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\nforall x (Chronic(x) -> not Cordless(x))\nforall x (Hyaline(x) and Cordless(x) -> Neuralgic(x))\nHyaline(leora) -> Nonfissile(leora)\nforall x (Burled(x) and Neuralgic(x) -> Hyaline(x))\nforall x (Myriad(x) -> Hyaline(x))\nMyriad(jessa) and not Cordless(jessa) -> Neuralgic(jessa)\nforall x (Neuralgic(x) -> not Burled(x))\n\nNonfissile(zebulen)\n\nforall x (Myriad(x) -> Nonfissile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Timi is not coercive. Timi is nebulose. Timi is unfunded. Timi is physical. Alia is nebulose. Madel is not fallible. Marcille is fallible. Young people are unfunded. All coercive people are not nebulose. All dissected, nebulose people are diarrhetic. If Timi is dissected then Timi is unfunded. All fallible, diarrhetic people are dissected. All physical people are dissected. If Madel is physical and Madel is not nebulose then Madel is diarrhetic. All diarrhetic people are not fallible. Alia is not fallible.", "logic": "\nnot Coercive(timi)\nNebulose(timi)\nUnfunded(timi)\nPhysical(timi)\nNebulose(alia)\nnot Fallible(madel)\nFallible(marcille)\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Coercive(x) -> not Nebulose(x))\nforall x (Dissected(x) and Nebulose(x) -> Diarrhetic(x))\nDissected(timi) -> Unfunded(timi)\nforall x (Fallible(x) and Diarrhetic(x) -> Dissected(x))\nforall x (Physical(x) -> Dissected(x))\nPhysical(madel) and not Nebulose(madel) -> Diarrhetic(madel)\nforall x (Diarrhetic(x) -> not Fallible(x))\n\nnot Fallible(alia)\n\nnot Fallible(alia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Fraser is not copacetic. Fraser is confining. Fraser is tapped. Fraser is advertised. Sparky is confining. Cary is not buttery. Paulo is buttery. Young people are tapped. All copacetic people are not confining. All arthurian, confining people are innocent. If Fraser is arthurian then Fraser is tapped. All buttery, innocent people are arthurian. All advertised people are arthurian. If Cary is advertised and Cary is not confining then Cary is innocent. All innocent people are not buttery. Cary is confining.", "logic": "\nnot Copacetic(fraser)\nConfining(fraser)\nTapped(fraser)\nAdvertised(fraser)\nConfining(sparky)\nnot Buttery(cary)\nButtery(paulo)\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> Tapped(x))\nforall x (Copacetic(x) -> not Confining(x))\nforall x (Arthurian(x) and Confining(x) -> Innocent(x))\nArthurian(fraser) -> Tapped(fraser)\nforall x (Buttery(x) and Innocent(x) -> Arthurian(x))\nforall x (Advertised(x) -> Arthurian(x))\nAdvertised(cary) and not Confining(cary) -> Innocent(cary)\nforall x (Innocent(x) -> not Buttery(x))\n\nConfining(cary)\n\nConfining(cary) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Nomi is not monodical. Nomi is fuggy. Nomi is elevated. Nomi is strict. Dynah is fuggy. Vernor is not bald. Keefe is bald. Young people are elevated. All monodical people are not fuggy. All depleted, fuggy people are yawning. If Nomi is depleted then Nomi is elevated. All bald, yawning people are depleted. All strict people are depleted. If Vernor is strict and Vernor is not fuggy then Vernor is yawning. All yawning people are not bald. Keefe is not strict.", "logic": "\nnot Monodical(nomi)\nFuggy(nomi)\nElevated(nomi)\nStrict(nomi)\nFuggy(dynah)\nnot Bald(vernor)\nBald(keefe)\nforall x (Strict(x) -> Elevated(x))\nforall x (Monodical(x) -> not Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Depleted(x) and Fuggy(x) -> Yawning(x))\nDepleted(nomi) -> Elevated(nomi)\nforall x (Bald(x) and Yawning(x) -> Depleted(x))\nforall x (Strict(x) -> Depleted(x))\nStrict(vernor) and not Fuggy(vernor) -> Yawning(vernor)\nforall x (Yawning(x) -> not Bald(x))\n\nnot Strict(keefe)\n\nnot Strict(keefe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Simonne is not overmuch. Simonne is botanical. Simonne is khaki. Simonne is nigh. Farand is botanical. Maribelle is not adducting. Hedy is adducting. Young people are khaki. All overmuch people are not botanical. All abdicable, botanical people are nerveless. If Simonne is abdicable then Simonne is khaki. All adducting, nerveless people are abdicable. All nigh people are abdicable. If Maribelle is nigh and Maribelle is not botanical then Maribelle is nerveless. All nerveless people are not adducting. Hedy is botanical.", "logic": "\nnot Overmuch(simonne)\nBotanical(simonne)\nKhaki(simonne)\nNigh(simonne)\nBotanical(farand)\nnot Adducting(maribelle)\nAdducting(hedy)\nforall x (Nigh(x) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Overmuch(x) -> not Botanical(x))\nforall x (Abdicable(x) and Botanical(x) -> Nerveless(x))\nAbdicable(simonne) -> Khaki(simonne)\nforall x (Adducting(x) and Nerveless(x) -> Abdicable(x))\nforall x (Nigh(x) -> Abdicable(x))\nNigh(maribelle) and not Botanical(maribelle) -> Nerveless(maribelle)\nforall x (Nerveless(x) -> not Adducting(x))\n\nBotanical(hedy)\n\nBotanical(hedy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1706"} {"premises": "Raven is blushful. Raven is southwest. Beverlee is blushful. Beverlee is vulcanised. Beverlee is four. Gates is blushful. Gates is concluding. Gates is southwest. Ally is blushful. Ally is concluding. Ally is vulcanised. Ally is four. Ally is fugly. Ally is southwest. Ally is bicyclic. Quiet, concluding things are fugly. Young, vulcanised things are concluding. Young, concluding things are fugly. Nice, four things are bicyclic. All fugly things are bicyclic. All southwest things are vulcanised. Gates is concluding.", "logic": "\nBlushful(raven)\nSouthwest(raven)\nBlushful(beverlee)\nVulcanised(beverlee)\nFour(beverlee)\nBlushful(gates)\nConcluding(gates)\nSouthwest(gates)\nBlushful(ally)\nConcluding(ally)\nVulcanised(ally)\nFour(ally)\nFugly(ally)\nSouthwest(ally)\nBicyclic(ally)\nforall x (Vulcanised(x) and Concluding(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Vulcanised(x) -> Concluding(x))\nforall x (Bicyclic(x) and Concluding(x) -> Fugly(x))\nforall x (Concluding(x) and Four(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Fugly(x) -> Bicyclic(x))\nforall x (Southwest(x) -> Vulcanised(x))\n\nConcluding(gates)\n\ntherefore Concluding(gates)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Lettie is paraplegic. Lettie is petalled. Cissie is paraplegic. Cissie is elliptic. Cissie is prepupal. Georgy is paraplegic. Georgy is lightsome. Georgy is petalled. Bernd is paraplegic. Bernd is lightsome. Bernd is elliptic. Bernd is prepupal. Bernd is nonlinear. Bernd is petalled. Bernd is slavonic. Quiet, lightsome things are nonlinear. Young, elliptic things are lightsome. Young, lightsome things are nonlinear. Nice, prepupal things are slavonic. All nonlinear things are slavonic. All petalled things are elliptic. Cissie is not elliptic.", "logic": "\nParaplegic(lettie)\nPetalled(lettie)\nParaplegic(cissie)\nElliptic(cissie)\nPrepupal(cissie)\nParaplegic(georgy)\nLightsome(georgy)\nPetalled(georgy)\nParaplegic(bernd)\nLightsome(bernd)\nElliptic(bernd)\nPrepupal(bernd)\nNonlinear(bernd)\nPetalled(bernd)\nSlavonic(bernd)\nforall x (Elliptic(x) and Lightsome(x) -> Nonlinear(x))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and Elliptic(x) -> Lightsome(x))\nforall x (Slavonic(x) and Lightsome(x) -> Nonlinear(x))\nforall x (Lightsome(x) and Prepupal(x) -> Slavonic(x))\nforall x (Nonlinear(x) -> Slavonic(x))\nforall x (Petalled(x) -> Elliptic(x))\n\nnot Elliptic(cissie)\n\ntherefore Elliptic(cissie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Regan is florentine. Regan is pharisaic. Shelia is florentine. Shelia is laboring. Shelia is runty. Eleanor is florentine. Eleanor is premiere. Eleanor is pharisaic. Nedda is florentine. Nedda is premiere. Nedda is laboring. Nedda is runty. Nedda is motiveless. Nedda is pharisaic. Nedda is hardbacked. Quiet, premiere things are motiveless. Young, laboring things are premiere. Young, premiere things are motiveless. Nice, runty things are hardbacked. All motiveless things are hardbacked. All pharisaic things are laboring. Regan is laboring.", "logic": "\nFlorentine(regan)\nPharisaic(regan)\nFlorentine(shelia)\nLaboring(shelia)\nRunty(shelia)\nFlorentine(eleanor)\nPremiere(eleanor)\nPharisaic(eleanor)\nFlorentine(nedda)\nPremiere(nedda)\nLaboring(nedda)\nRunty(nedda)\nMotiveless(nedda)\nPharisaic(nedda)\nHardbacked(nedda)\nforall x (Laboring(x) and Premiere(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Hardbacked(x) and Laboring(x) -> Premiere(x))\nforall x (Hardbacked(x) and Premiere(x) -> Motiveless(x))\nforall x (Premiere(x) and Runty(x) -> Hardbacked(x))\nforall x (Motiveless(x) -> Hardbacked(x))\nforall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Laboring(x))\n\nLaboring(regan)\n\nPharisaic(regan) and forall x (Pharisaic(x) -> Laboring(x)) -> therefore Laboring(regan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Margarete is affinal. Margarete is aboveboard. Ami is affinal. Ami is lighted. Ami is currish. Chere is affinal. Chere is raiseable. Chere is aboveboard. Marko is affinal. Marko is raiseable. Marko is lighted. Marko is currish. Marko is undirected. Marko is aboveboard. Marko is whopping. Quiet, raiseable things are undirected. Young, lighted things are raiseable. Young, raiseable things are undirected. Nice, currish things are whopping. All undirected things are whopping. All aboveboard things are lighted. Margarete is not lighted.", "logic": "\nAffinal(margarete)\nAboveboard(margarete)\nAffinal(ami)\nLighted(ami)\nCurrish(ami)\nAffinal(chere)\nRaiseable(chere)\nAboveboard(chere)\nAffinal(marko)\nRaiseable(marko)\nLighted(marko)\nCurrish(marko)\nUndirected(marko)\nAboveboard(marko)\nWhopping(marko)\nforall x (Lighted(x) and Raiseable(x) -> Undirected(x))\nforall x (Whopping(x) and Lighted(x) -> Raiseable(x))\nforall x (Whopping(x) and Raiseable(x) -> Undirected(x))\nforall x (Raiseable(x) and Currish(x) -> Whopping(x))\nforall x (Undirected(x) -> Whopping(x))\nforall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Lighted(x))\n\nnot Lighted(margarete)\n\nAboveboard(margarete) and forall x (Aboveboard(x) -> Lighted(x)) -> therefore Lighted(margarete)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Sibbie is eighteen. Sibbie is gallican. Corby is eighteen. Corby is dextrorse. Corby is counter. Danna is eighteen. Danna is inebriated. Danna is gallican. Wenona is eighteen. Wenona is inebriated. Wenona is dextrorse. Wenona is counter. Wenona is sloped. Wenona is gallican. Wenona is streetwise. Quiet, inebriated things are sloped. Young, dextrorse things are inebriated. Young, inebriated things are sloped. Nice, counter things are streetwise. All sloped things are streetwise. All gallican things are dextrorse. Danna is sloped.", "logic": "\nEighteen(sibbie)\nGallican(sibbie)\nEighteen(corby)\nDextrorse(corby)\nCounter(corby)\nEighteen(danna)\nInebriated(danna)\nGallican(danna)\nEighteen(wenona)\nInebriated(wenona)\nDextrorse(wenona)\nCounter(wenona)\nSloped(wenona)\nGallican(wenona)\nStreetwise(wenona)\nforall x (Dextrorse(x) and Inebriated(x) -> Sloped(x))\nforall x (Streetwise(x) and Dextrorse(x) -> Inebriated(x))\nforall x (Streetwise(x) and Inebriated(x) -> Sloped(x))\nforall x (Inebriated(x) and Counter(x) -> Streetwise(x))\nforall x (Sloped(x) -> Streetwise(x))\nforall x (Gallican(x) -> Dextrorse(x))\n\nSloped(danna)\n\nGallican(danna) and forall x (Gallican(x) -> Dextrorse(x)) -> therefore Dextrorse(danna) Dextrorse(danna) and Inebriated(danna) and forall x (Dextrorse(x) and Inebriated(x) -> Sloped(x)) -> therefore Sloped(danna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Jeffrey is bifilar. Jeffrey is model. Livia is bifilar. Livia is unsheared. Livia is extensive. Stephanus is bifilar. Stephanus is fetching. Stephanus is model. Maudie is bifilar. Maudie is fetching. Maudie is unsheared. Maudie is extensive. Maudie is porcine. Maudie is model. Maudie is employed. Quiet, fetching things are porcine. Young, unsheared things are fetching. Young, fetching things are porcine. Nice, extensive things are employed. All porcine things are employed. All model things are unsheared. Stephanus is not porcine.", "logic": "\nBifilar(jeffrey)\nModel(jeffrey)\nBifilar(livia)\nUnsheared(livia)\nExtensive(livia)\nBifilar(stephanus)\nFetching(stephanus)\nModel(stephanus)\nBifilar(maudie)\nFetching(maudie)\nUnsheared(maudie)\nExtensive(maudie)\nPorcine(maudie)\nModel(maudie)\nEmployed(maudie)\nforall x (Unsheared(x) and Fetching(x) -> Porcine(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) and Unsheared(x) -> Fetching(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) and Fetching(x) -> Porcine(x))\nforall x (Fetching(x) and Extensive(x) -> Employed(x))\nforall x (Porcine(x) -> Employed(x))\nforall x (Model(x) -> Unsheared(x))\n\nnot Porcine(stephanus)\n\nModel(stephanus) and forall x (Model(x) -> Unsheared(x)) -> therefore Unsheared(stephanus) Unsheared(stephanus) and Fetching(stephanus) and forall x (Unsheared(x) and Fetching(x) -> Porcine(x)) -> therefore Porcine(stephanus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Jonathan is gravid. Jonathan is living. Rosie is gravid. Rosie is unbleached. Rosie is unread. Case is gravid. Case is unhuman. Case is living. Geo is gravid. Geo is unhuman. Geo is unbleached. Geo is unread. Geo is fossil. Geo is living. Geo is plausible. Quiet, unhuman things are fossil. Young, unbleached things are unhuman. Young, unhuman things are fossil. Nice, unread things are plausible. All fossil things are plausible. All living things are unbleached. Case is plausible.", "logic": "\nGravid(jonathan)\nLiving(jonathan)\nGravid(rosie)\nUnbleached(rosie)\nUnread(rosie)\nGravid(case)\nUnhuman(case)\nLiving(case)\nGravid(geo)\nUnhuman(geo)\nUnbleached(geo)\nUnread(geo)\nFossil(geo)\nLiving(geo)\nPlausible(geo)\nforall x (Unbleached(x) and Unhuman(x) -> Fossil(x))\nforall x (Plausible(x) and Unbleached(x) -> Unhuman(x))\nforall x (Plausible(x) and Unhuman(x) -> Fossil(x))\nforall x (Unhuman(x) and Unread(x) -> Plausible(x))\nforall x (Fossil(x) -> Plausible(x))\nforall x (Living(x) -> Unbleached(x))\n\nPlausible(case)\n\nLiving(case) and forall x (Living(x) -> Unbleached(x)) -> therefore Unbleached(case) Unbleached(case) and Unhuman(case) and forall x (Unbleached(x) and Unhuman(x) -> Fossil(x)) -> therefore Fossil(case) Fossil(case) and forall x (Fossil(x) -> Plausible(x)) -> therefore Plausible(case)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Slade is patristic. Slade is himalayan. Issie is patristic. Issie is acanthoid. Issie is suburban. Noelani is patristic. Noelani is standard. Noelani is himalayan. Erna is patristic. Erna is standard. Erna is acanthoid. Erna is suburban. Erna is netted. Erna is himalayan. Erna is ravaging. Quiet, standard things are netted. Young, acanthoid things are standard. Young, standard things are netted. Nice, suburban things are ravaging. All netted things are ravaging. All himalayan things are acanthoid. Noelani is not ravaging.", "logic": "\nPatristic(slade)\nHimalayan(slade)\nPatristic(issie)\nAcanthoid(issie)\nSuburban(issie)\nPatristic(noelani)\nStandard(noelani)\nHimalayan(noelani)\nPatristic(erna)\nStandard(erna)\nAcanthoid(erna)\nSuburban(erna)\nNetted(erna)\nHimalayan(erna)\nRavaging(erna)\nforall x (Acanthoid(x) and Standard(x) -> Netted(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) and Acanthoid(x) -> Standard(x))\nforall x (Ravaging(x) and Standard(x) -> Netted(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) and Suburban(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Netted(x) -> Ravaging(x))\nforall x (Himalayan(x) -> Acanthoid(x))\n\nnot Ravaging(noelani)\n\nHimalayan(noelani) and forall x (Himalayan(x) -> Acanthoid(x)) -> therefore Acanthoid(noelani) Acanthoid(noelani) and Standard(noelani) and forall x (Acanthoid(x) and Standard(x) -> Netted(x)) -> therefore Netted(noelani) Netted(noelani) and forall x (Netted(x) -> Ravaging(x)) -> therefore Ravaging(noelani)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Steffane is mullioned. Steffane is dactylic. Charlot is mullioned. Charlot is ordinary. Charlot is incurvate. Lila is mullioned. Lila is deathly. Lila is dactylic. Shea is mullioned. Shea is deathly. Shea is ordinary. Shea is incurvate. Shea is farsighted. Shea is dactylic. Shea is lobated. Quiet, deathly things are farsighted. Young, ordinary things are deathly. Young, deathly things are farsighted. Nice, incurvate things are lobated. All farsighted things are lobated. All dactylic things are ordinary. Charlot is not farsighted.", "logic": "\nMullioned(steffane)\nDactylic(steffane)\nMullioned(charlot)\nOrdinary(charlot)\nIncurvate(charlot)\nMullioned(lila)\nDeathly(lila)\nDactylic(lila)\nMullioned(shea)\nDeathly(shea)\nOrdinary(shea)\nIncurvate(shea)\nFarsighted(shea)\nDactylic(shea)\nLobated(shea)\nforall x (Ordinary(x) and Deathly(x) -> Farsighted(x))\nforall x (Lobated(x) and Ordinary(x) -> Deathly(x))\nforall x (Lobated(x) and Deathly(x) -> Farsighted(x))\nforall x (Deathly(x) and Incurvate(x) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Farsighted(x) -> Lobated(x))\nforall x (Dactylic(x) -> Ordinary(x))\n\nnot Farsighted(charlot)\n\nforall x (Ordinary(x) and Deathly(x) -> Farsighted(x)) <- forall x (Lobated(x) and Ordinary(x) -> Deathly(x)) <- forall x (Farsighted(x) -> Lobated(x)) <- forall x (Lobated(x) and Deathly(x) -> Farsighted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Baldwin is anterior. Baldwin is seething. Cyrille is anterior. Cyrille is erudite. Cyrille is daughterly. Thaxter is anterior. Thaxter is possessive. Thaxter is seething. Ilysa is anterior. Ilysa is possessive. Ilysa is erudite. Ilysa is daughterly. Ilysa is tritanopic. Ilysa is seething. Ilysa is indoor. Quiet, possessive things are tritanopic. Young, erudite things are possessive. Young, possessive things are tritanopic. Nice, daughterly things are indoor. All tritanopic things are indoor. All seething things are erudite. Cyrille is indoor.", "logic": "\nAnterior(baldwin)\nSeething(baldwin)\nAnterior(cyrille)\nErudite(cyrille)\nDaughterly(cyrille)\nAnterior(thaxter)\nPossessive(thaxter)\nSeething(thaxter)\nAnterior(ilysa)\nPossessive(ilysa)\nErudite(ilysa)\nDaughterly(ilysa)\nTritanopic(ilysa)\nSeething(ilysa)\nIndoor(ilysa)\nforall x (Erudite(x) and Possessive(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Indoor(x) and Erudite(x) -> Possessive(x))\nforall x (Indoor(x) and Possessive(x) -> Tritanopic(x))\nforall x (Possessive(x) and Daughterly(x) -> Indoor(x))\nforall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Indoor(x))\nforall x (Seething(x) -> Erudite(x))\n\nIndoor(cyrille)\n\nforall x (Possessive(x) and Daughterly(x) -> Indoor(x)) <- forall x (Indoor(x) and Erudite(x) -> Possessive(x)) <- forall x (Tritanopic(x) -> Indoor(x)) <- forall x (Erudite(x) and Possessive(x) -> Tritanopic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 4, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Boris is overt. Boris is prenuptial. Ainslie is overt. Ainslie is lacteal. Ainslie is chafflike. Berny is overt. Berny is covered. Berny is prenuptial. Broderic is overt. Broderic is covered. Broderic is lacteal. Broderic is chafflike. Broderic is finished. Broderic is prenuptial. Broderic is unconsumed. Quiet, covered things are finished. Young, lacteal things are covered. Young, covered things are finished. Nice, chafflike things are unconsumed. All finished things are unconsumed. All prenuptial things are lacteal. Boris is not covered.", "logic": "\nOvert(boris)\nPrenuptial(boris)\nOvert(ainslie)\nLacteal(ainslie)\nChafflike(ainslie)\nOvert(berny)\nCovered(berny)\nPrenuptial(berny)\nOvert(broderic)\nCovered(broderic)\nLacteal(broderic)\nChafflike(broderic)\nFinished(broderic)\nPrenuptial(broderic)\nUnconsumed(broderic)\nforall x (Lacteal(x) and Covered(x) -> Finished(x))\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) and Lacteal(x) -> Covered(x))\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) and Covered(x) -> Finished(x))\nforall x (Covered(x) and Chafflike(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nforall x (Finished(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nforall x (Prenuptial(x) -> Lacteal(x))\n\nnot Covered(boris)\n\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) and Lacteal(x) -> Covered(x)) <- forall x (Finished(x) -> Unconsumed(x)) <- forall x (Lacteal(x) and Covered(x) -> Finished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Row is atoxic. Row is atoxic. Pasquale is atoxic. Pasquale is treeless. Pasquale is bloodless. Thaddeus is atoxic. Thaddeus is subarctic. Thaddeus is atoxic. Linnet is atoxic. Linnet is subarctic. Linnet is treeless. Linnet is bloodless. Linnet is hidrotic. Linnet is atoxic. Linnet is defiled. Quiet, subarctic things are hidrotic. Young, treeless things are subarctic. Young, subarctic things are hidrotic. Nice, bloodless things are defiled. All hidrotic things are defiled. All atoxic things are treeless. Pasquale is subarctic.", "logic": "\nAtoxic(row)\nAtoxic(row)\nAtoxic(pasquale)\nTreeless(pasquale)\nBloodless(pasquale)\nAtoxic(thaddeus)\nSubarctic(thaddeus)\nAtoxic(thaddeus)\nAtoxic(linnet)\nSubarctic(linnet)\nTreeless(linnet)\nBloodless(linnet)\nHidrotic(linnet)\nAtoxic(linnet)\nDefiled(linnet)\nforall x (Treeless(x) and Subarctic(x) -> Hidrotic(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Treeless(x) -> Subarctic(x))\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Subarctic(x) -> Hidrotic(x))\nforall x (Subarctic(x) and Bloodless(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Hidrotic(x) -> Defiled(x))\nforall x (Atoxic(x) -> Treeless(x))\n\nSubarctic(pasquale)\n\nforall x (Defiled(x) and Treeless(x) -> Subarctic(x)) <- forall x (Hidrotic(x) -> Defiled(x)) <- forall x (Treeless(x) and Subarctic(x) -> Hidrotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Thebault is thrombosed. Thebault is romansh. Sybille is thrombosed. Sybille is zoological. Sybille is numberless. Berke is thrombosed. Berke is lxxv. Berke is romansh. Johann is thrombosed. Johann is lxxv. Johann is zoological. Johann is numberless. Johann is paschal. Johann is romansh. Johann is bearish. Quiet, lxxv things are paschal. Young, zoological things are lxxv. Young, lxxv things are paschal. Nice, numberless things are bearish. All paschal things are bearish. All romansh things are zoological. Berke is not numberless.", "logic": "\nThrombosed(thebault)\nRomansh(thebault)\nThrombosed(sybille)\nZoological(sybille)\nNumberless(sybille)\nThrombosed(berke)\nLxxv(berke)\nRomansh(berke)\nThrombosed(johann)\nLxxv(johann)\nZoological(johann)\nNumberless(johann)\nPaschal(johann)\nRomansh(johann)\nBearish(johann)\nforall x (Zoological(x) and Lxxv(x) -> Paschal(x))\nforall x (Bearish(x) and Zoological(x) -> Lxxv(x))\nforall x (Bearish(x) and Lxxv(x) -> Paschal(x))\nforall x (Lxxv(x) and Numberless(x) -> Bearish(x))\nforall x (Paschal(x) -> Bearish(x))\nforall x (Romansh(x) -> Zoological(x))\n\nnot Numberless(berke)\n\nnot Numberless(berke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "Leanna is nonchalant. Leanna is patent. Rubie is nonchalant. Rubie is shintoist. Rubie is naturistic. Cassi is nonchalant. Cassi is genovese. Cassi is patent. Philippe is nonchalant. Philippe is genovese. Philippe is shintoist. Philippe is naturistic. Philippe is statuesque. Philippe is patent. Philippe is ordinal. Quiet, genovese things are statuesque. Young, shintoist things are genovese. Young, genovese things are statuesque. Nice, naturistic things are ordinal. All statuesque things are ordinal. All patent things are shintoist. Rubie is patent.", "logic": "\nNonchalant(leanna)\nPatent(leanna)\nNonchalant(rubie)\nShintoist(rubie)\nNaturistic(rubie)\nNonchalant(cassi)\nGenovese(cassi)\nPatent(cassi)\nNonchalant(philippe)\nGenovese(philippe)\nShintoist(philippe)\nNaturistic(philippe)\nStatuesque(philippe)\nPatent(philippe)\nOrdinal(philippe)\nforall x (Shintoist(x) and Genovese(x) -> Statuesque(x))\nforall x (Ordinal(x) and Shintoist(x) -> Genovese(x))\nforall x (Ordinal(x) and Genovese(x) -> Statuesque(x))\nforall x (Genovese(x) and Naturistic(x) -> Ordinal(x))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) -> Ordinal(x))\nforall x (Patent(x) -> Shintoist(x))\n\nPatent(rubie)\n\nPatent(rubie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1561"} {"premises": "The emiline refract the aamir. The emiline is not manual. The pen does not chase the emiline. The pen bask the hogan. The pen does not eat the aamir. The pen is bland. The pen is manual. The pen does not need the aamir. The aamir mosey the emiline. The hogan bask the pen. The hogan bask the aamir. The hogan does not eat the pen. The hogan is developed. The hogan is manual. The hogan mosey the emiline. The hogan mosey the pen. If the hogan does not chase the pen then the hogan bask the emiline. If something mosey the hogan then it bask the hogan. If something is manual then it mosey the pen. If the aamir bask the hogan then the hogan is bland. If something refract the aamir then the aamir mosey the hogan. If the pen refract the hogan and the pen bask the emiline then the emiline mosey the aamir. The pen bask the hogan.", "logic": "\nRefract(emiline, aamir)\nnot Manual(emiline)\nnot Bask(pen, emiline)\nBask(pen, hogan)\nnot Refract(pen, aamir)\nBland(pen)\nManual(pen)\nnot Mosey(pen, aamir)\nMosey(aamir, emiline)\nBask(hogan, pen)\nBask(hogan, aamir)\nnot Refract(hogan, pen)\nDeveloped(hogan)\nManual(hogan)\nMosey(hogan, emiline)\nMosey(hogan, pen)\nnot Bask(hogan, pen) -> Bask(hogan, emiline)\nforall x (Mosey(x, hogan) -> Bask(x, hogan))\nforall x (Manual(x) -> Mosey(x, pen))\nBask(aamir, hogan) -> Bland(hogan)\nforall x (Refract(x, aamir) -> Mosey(aamir, hogan))\nRefract(pen, hogan) and Bask(pen, emiline) -> Mosey(emiline, aamir)\n\nBask(pen, hogan)\n\ntherefore Bask(pen, hogan)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The ingemar company the vivienne. The ingemar is not unworldly. The mavra does not chase the ingemar. The mavra claim the tiphany. The mavra does not eat the vivienne. The mavra is piercing. The mavra is unworldly. The mavra does not need the vivienne. The vivienne dehumanise the ingemar. The tiphany claim the mavra. The tiphany claim the vivienne. The tiphany does not eat the mavra. The tiphany is uncapped. The tiphany is unworldly. The tiphany dehumanise the ingemar. The tiphany dehumanise the mavra. If the tiphany does not chase the mavra then the tiphany claim the ingemar. If something dehumanise the tiphany then it claim the tiphany. If something is unworldly then it dehumanise the mavra. If the vivienne claim the tiphany then the tiphany is piercing. If something company the vivienne then the vivienne dehumanise the tiphany. If the mavra company the tiphany and the mavra claim the ingemar then the ingemar dehumanise the vivienne. The mavra is not unworldly.", "logic": "\nCompany(ingemar, vivienne)\nnot Unworldly(ingemar)\nnot Claim(mavra, ingemar)\nClaim(mavra, tiphany)\nnot Company(mavra, vivienne)\nPiercing(mavra)\nUnworldly(mavra)\nnot Dehumanise(mavra, vivienne)\nDehumanise(vivienne, ingemar)\nClaim(tiphany, mavra)\nClaim(tiphany, vivienne)\nnot Company(tiphany, mavra)\nUncapped(tiphany)\nUnworldly(tiphany)\nDehumanise(tiphany, ingemar)\nDehumanise(tiphany, mavra)\nnot Claim(tiphany, mavra) -> Claim(tiphany, ingemar)\nforall x (Dehumanise(x, tiphany) -> Claim(x, tiphany))\nforall x (Unworldly(x) -> Dehumanise(x, mavra))\nClaim(vivienne, tiphany) -> Piercing(tiphany)\nforall x (Company(x, vivienne) -> Dehumanise(vivienne, tiphany))\nCompany(mavra, tiphany) and Claim(mavra, ingemar) -> Dehumanise(ingemar, vivienne)\n\nnot Unworldly(mavra)\n\ntherefore Unworldly(mavra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The kaylyn compete the clara. The kaylyn is not womanly. The brena does not chase the kaylyn. The brena cere the jervis. The brena does not eat the clara. The brena is guided. The brena is womanly. The brena does not need the clara. The clara throb the kaylyn. The jervis cere the brena. The jervis cere the clara. The jervis does not eat the brena. The jervis is labiate. The jervis is womanly. The jervis throb the kaylyn. The jervis throb the brena. If the jervis does not chase the brena then the jervis cere the kaylyn. If something throb the jervis then it cere the jervis. If something is womanly then it throb the brena. If the clara cere the jervis then the jervis is guided. If something compete the clara then the clara throb the jervis. If the brena compete the jervis and the brena cere the kaylyn then the kaylyn throb the clara. The brena throb the brena.", "logic": "\nCompete(kaylyn, clara)\nnot Womanly(kaylyn)\nnot Cere(brena, kaylyn)\nCere(brena, jervis)\nnot Compete(brena, clara)\nGuided(brena)\nWomanly(brena)\nnot Throb(brena, clara)\nThrob(clara, kaylyn)\nCere(jervis, brena)\nCere(jervis, clara)\nnot Compete(jervis, brena)\nLabiate(jervis)\nWomanly(jervis)\nThrob(jervis, kaylyn)\nThrob(jervis, brena)\nnot Cere(jervis, brena) -> Cere(jervis, kaylyn)\nforall x (Throb(x, jervis) -> Cere(x, jervis))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Throb(x, brena))\nCere(clara, jervis) -> Guided(jervis)\nforall x (Compete(x, clara) -> Throb(clara, jervis))\nCompete(brena, jervis) and Cere(brena, kaylyn) -> Throb(kaylyn, clara)\n\nThrob(brena, brena)\n\nWomanly(brena) and forall x (Womanly(x) -> Throb(x, brena)) -> therefore Throb(brena, brena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The amelita filigree the starr. The amelita is not lone. The mitchell does not chase the amelita. The mitchell patent the leese. The mitchell does not eat the starr. The mitchell is sneering. The mitchell is lone. The mitchell does not need the starr. The starr disconcert the amelita. The leese patent the mitchell. The leese patent the starr. The leese does not eat the mitchell. The leese is legible. The leese is lone. The leese disconcert the amelita. The leese disconcert the mitchell. If the leese does not chase the mitchell then the leese patent the amelita. If something disconcert the leese then it patent the leese. If something is lone then it disconcert the mitchell. If the starr patent the leese then the leese is sneering. If something filigree the starr then the starr disconcert the leese. If the mitchell filigree the leese and the mitchell patent the amelita then the amelita disconcert the starr. The mitchell does not need the mitchell.", "logic": "\nFiligree(amelita, starr)\nnot Lone(amelita)\nnot Patent(mitchell, amelita)\nPatent(mitchell, leese)\nnot Filigree(mitchell, starr)\nSneering(mitchell)\nLone(mitchell)\nnot Disconcert(mitchell, starr)\nDisconcert(starr, amelita)\nPatent(leese, mitchell)\nPatent(leese, starr)\nnot Filigree(leese, mitchell)\nLegible(leese)\nLone(leese)\nDisconcert(leese, amelita)\nDisconcert(leese, mitchell)\nnot Patent(leese, mitchell) -> Patent(leese, amelita)\nforall x (Disconcert(x, leese) -> Patent(x, leese))\nforall x (Lone(x) -> Disconcert(x, mitchell))\nPatent(starr, leese) -> Sneering(leese)\nforall x (Filigree(x, starr) -> Disconcert(starr, leese))\nFiligree(mitchell, leese) and Patent(mitchell, amelita) -> Disconcert(amelita, starr)\n\nnot Disconcert(mitchell, mitchell)\n\nLone(mitchell) and forall x (Lone(x) -> Disconcert(x, mitchell)) -> therefore Disconcert(mitchell, mitchell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The fayre browse the darcee. The fayre is not trussed. The cecil does not chase the fayre. The cecil subvention the hubert. The cecil does not eat the darcee. The cecil is optative. The cecil is trussed. The cecil does not need the darcee. The darcee footslog the fayre. The hubert subvention the cecil. The hubert subvention the darcee. The hubert does not eat the cecil. The hubert is macedonian. The hubert is trussed. The hubert footslog the fayre. The hubert footslog the cecil. If the hubert does not chase the cecil then the hubert subvention the fayre. If something footslog the hubert then it subvention the hubert. If something is trussed then it footslog the cecil. If the darcee subvention the hubert then the hubert is optative. If something browse the darcee then the darcee footslog the hubert. If the cecil browse the hubert and the cecil subvention the fayre then the fayre footslog the darcee. The darcee subvention the hubert.", "logic": "\nBrowse(fayre, darcee)\nnot Trussed(fayre)\nnot Subvention(cecil, fayre)\nSubvention(cecil, hubert)\nnot Browse(cecil, darcee)\nOptative(cecil)\nTrussed(cecil)\nnot Footslog(cecil, darcee)\nFootslog(darcee, fayre)\nSubvention(hubert, cecil)\nSubvention(hubert, darcee)\nnot Browse(hubert, cecil)\nMacedonian(hubert)\nTrussed(hubert)\nFootslog(hubert, fayre)\nFootslog(hubert, cecil)\nnot Subvention(hubert, cecil) -> Subvention(hubert, fayre)\nforall x (Footslog(x, hubert) -> Subvention(x, hubert))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> Footslog(x, cecil))\nSubvention(darcee, hubert) -> Optative(hubert)\nforall x (Browse(x, darcee) -> Footslog(darcee, hubert))\nBrowse(cecil, hubert) and Subvention(cecil, fayre) -> Footslog(fayre, darcee)\n\nSubvention(darcee, hubert)\n\nBrowse(fayre, darcee) and forall x (Browse(x, darcee) -> Footslog(darcee, hubert)) -> therefore Footslog(darcee, hubert) Footslog(darcee, hubert) and forall x (Footslog(x, hubert) -> Subvention(x, hubert)) -> therefore Subvention(darcee, hubert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The blythe cloak the lulu. The blythe is not cranial. The brianne does not chase the blythe. The brianne galumph the tannie. The brianne does not eat the lulu. The brianne is bribable. The brianne is cranial. The brianne does not need the lulu. The lulu bolshevize the blythe. The tannie galumph the brianne. The tannie galumph the lulu. The tannie does not eat the brianne. The tannie is doddery. The tannie is cranial. The tannie bolshevize the blythe. The tannie bolshevize the brianne. If the tannie does not chase the brianne then the tannie galumph the blythe. If something bolshevize the tannie then it galumph the tannie. If something is cranial then it bolshevize the brianne. If the lulu galumph the tannie then the tannie is bribable. If something cloak the lulu then the lulu bolshevize the tannie. If the brianne cloak the tannie and the brianne galumph the blythe then the blythe bolshevize the lulu. The lulu does not chase the tannie.", "logic": "\nCloak(blythe, lulu)\nnot Cranial(blythe)\nnot Galumph(brianne, blythe)\nGalumph(brianne, tannie)\nnot Cloak(brianne, lulu)\nBribable(brianne)\nCranial(brianne)\nnot Bolshevize(brianne, lulu)\nBolshevize(lulu, blythe)\nGalumph(tannie, brianne)\nGalumph(tannie, lulu)\nnot Cloak(tannie, brianne)\nDoddery(tannie)\nCranial(tannie)\nBolshevize(tannie, blythe)\nBolshevize(tannie, brianne)\nnot Galumph(tannie, brianne) -> Galumph(tannie, blythe)\nforall x (Bolshevize(x, tannie) -> Galumph(x, tannie))\nforall x (Cranial(x) -> Bolshevize(x, brianne))\nGalumph(lulu, tannie) -> Bribable(tannie)\nforall x (Cloak(x, lulu) -> Bolshevize(lulu, tannie))\nCloak(brianne, tannie) and Galumph(brianne, blythe) -> Bolshevize(blythe, lulu)\n\nnot Galumph(lulu, tannie)\n\nCloak(blythe, lulu) and forall x (Cloak(x, lulu) -> Bolshevize(lulu, tannie)) -> therefore Bolshevize(lulu, tannie) Bolshevize(lulu, tannie) and forall x (Bolshevize(x, tannie) -> Galumph(x, tannie)) -> therefore Galumph(lulu, tannie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The winn catch the shirleen. The winn is not antitoxic. The geoffry does not chase the winn. The geoffry revel the mackenzie. The geoffry does not eat the shirleen. The geoffry is hypnoid. The geoffry is antitoxic. The geoffry does not need the shirleen. The shirleen wawl the winn. The mackenzie revel the geoffry. The mackenzie revel the shirleen. The mackenzie does not eat the geoffry. The mackenzie is sylvan. The mackenzie is antitoxic. The mackenzie wawl the winn. The mackenzie wawl the geoffry. If the mackenzie does not chase the geoffry then the mackenzie revel the winn. If something wawl the mackenzie then it revel the mackenzie. If something is antitoxic then it wawl the geoffry. If the shirleen revel the mackenzie then the mackenzie is hypnoid. If something catch the shirleen then the shirleen wawl the mackenzie. If the geoffry catch the mackenzie and the geoffry revel the winn then the winn wawl the shirleen. The mackenzie is hypnoid.", "logic": "\nCatch(winn, shirleen)\nnot Antitoxic(winn)\nnot Revel(geoffry, winn)\nRevel(geoffry, mackenzie)\nnot Catch(geoffry, shirleen)\nHypnoid(geoffry)\nAntitoxic(geoffry)\nnot Wawl(geoffry, shirleen)\nWawl(shirleen, winn)\nRevel(mackenzie, geoffry)\nRevel(mackenzie, shirleen)\nnot Catch(mackenzie, geoffry)\nSylvan(mackenzie)\nAntitoxic(mackenzie)\nWawl(mackenzie, winn)\nWawl(mackenzie, geoffry)\nnot Revel(mackenzie, geoffry) -> Revel(mackenzie, winn)\nforall x (Wawl(x, mackenzie) -> Revel(x, mackenzie))\nforall x (Antitoxic(x) -> Wawl(x, geoffry))\nRevel(shirleen, mackenzie) -> Hypnoid(mackenzie)\nforall x (Catch(x, shirleen) -> Wawl(shirleen, mackenzie))\nCatch(geoffry, mackenzie) and Revel(geoffry, winn) -> Wawl(winn, shirleen)\n\nHypnoid(mackenzie)\n\nCatch(winn, shirleen) and forall x (Catch(x, shirleen) -> Wawl(shirleen, mackenzie)) -> therefore Wawl(shirleen, mackenzie) Wawl(shirleen, mackenzie) and forall x (Wawl(x, mackenzie) -> Revel(x, mackenzie)) -> therefore Revel(shirleen, mackenzie) Revel(shirleen, mackenzie) and Revel(shirleen, mackenzie) -> Hypnoid(mackenzie) -> therefore Hypnoid(mackenzie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The torrey telex the blondelle. The torrey is not cuneal. The tiff does not chase the torrey. The tiff splat the brenn. The tiff does not eat the blondelle. The tiff is partible. The tiff is cuneal. The tiff does not need the blondelle. The blondelle hygienize the torrey. The brenn splat the tiff. The brenn splat the blondelle. The brenn does not eat the tiff. The brenn is piscine. The brenn is cuneal. The brenn hygienize the torrey. The brenn hygienize the tiff. If the brenn does not chase the tiff then the brenn splat the torrey. If something hygienize the brenn then it splat the brenn. If something is cuneal then it hygienize the tiff. If the blondelle splat the brenn then the brenn is partible. If something telex the blondelle then the blondelle hygienize the brenn. If the tiff telex the brenn and the tiff splat the torrey then the torrey hygienize the blondelle. The brenn is not partible.", "logic": "\nTelex(torrey, blondelle)\nnot Cuneal(torrey)\nnot Splat(tiff, torrey)\nSplat(tiff, brenn)\nnot Telex(tiff, blondelle)\nPartible(tiff)\nCuneal(tiff)\nnot Hygienize(tiff, blondelle)\nHygienize(blondelle, torrey)\nSplat(brenn, tiff)\nSplat(brenn, blondelle)\nnot Telex(brenn, tiff)\nPiscine(brenn)\nCuneal(brenn)\nHygienize(brenn, torrey)\nHygienize(brenn, tiff)\nnot Splat(brenn, tiff) -> Splat(brenn, torrey)\nforall x (Hygienize(x, brenn) -> Splat(x, brenn))\nforall x (Cuneal(x) -> Hygienize(x, tiff))\nSplat(blondelle, brenn) -> Partible(brenn)\nforall x (Telex(x, blondelle) -> Hygienize(blondelle, brenn))\nTelex(tiff, brenn) and Splat(tiff, torrey) -> Hygienize(torrey, blondelle)\n\nnot Partible(brenn)\n\nTelex(torrey, blondelle) and forall x (Telex(x, blondelle) -> Hygienize(blondelle, brenn)) -> therefore Hygienize(blondelle, brenn) Hygienize(blondelle, brenn) and forall x (Hygienize(x, brenn) -> Splat(x, brenn)) -> therefore Splat(blondelle, brenn) Splat(blondelle, brenn) and Splat(blondelle, brenn) -> Partible(brenn) -> therefore Partible(brenn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The moina ovulate the victoria. The moina is not fruiting. The bettye does not chase the moina. The bettye brachiate the karylin. The bettye does not eat the victoria. The bettye is unloved. The bettye is fruiting. The bettye does not need the victoria. The victoria troll the moina. The karylin brachiate the bettye. The karylin brachiate the victoria. The karylin does not eat the bettye. The karylin is synthetic. The karylin is fruiting. The karylin troll the moina. The karylin troll the bettye. If the karylin does not chase the bettye then the karylin brachiate the moina. If something troll the karylin then it brachiate the karylin. If something is fruiting then it troll the bettye. If the victoria brachiate the karylin then the karylin is unloved. If something ovulate the victoria then the victoria troll the karylin. If the bettye ovulate the karylin and the bettye brachiate the moina then the moina troll the victoria. The moina does not chase the karylin.", "logic": "\nOvulate(moina, victoria)\nnot Fruiting(moina)\nnot Brachiate(bettye, moina)\nBrachiate(bettye, karylin)\nnot Ovulate(bettye, victoria)\nUnloved(bettye)\nFruiting(bettye)\nnot Troll(bettye, victoria)\nTroll(victoria, moina)\nBrachiate(karylin, bettye)\nBrachiate(karylin, victoria)\nnot Ovulate(karylin, bettye)\nSynthetic(karylin)\nFruiting(karylin)\nTroll(karylin, moina)\nTroll(karylin, bettye)\nnot Brachiate(karylin, bettye) -> Brachiate(karylin, moina)\nforall x (Troll(x, karylin) -> Brachiate(x, karylin))\nforall x (Fruiting(x) -> Troll(x, bettye))\nBrachiate(victoria, karylin) -> Unloved(karylin)\nforall x (Ovulate(x, victoria) -> Troll(victoria, karylin))\nOvulate(bettye, karylin) and Brachiate(bettye, moina) -> Troll(moina, victoria)\n\nnot Brachiate(moina, karylin)\n\nforall x (Troll(x, karylin) -> Brachiate(x, karylin)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The keenan exempt the shelley. The keenan is not arsenical. The vanni does not chase the keenan. The vanni equalise the lishe. The vanni does not eat the shelley. The vanni is dour. The vanni is arsenical. The vanni does not need the shelley. The shelley bemoan the keenan. The lishe equalise the vanni. The lishe equalise the shelley. The lishe does not eat the vanni. The lishe is theoretic. The lishe is arsenical. The lishe bemoan the keenan. The lishe bemoan the vanni. If the lishe does not chase the vanni then the lishe equalise the keenan. If something bemoan the lishe then it equalise the lishe. If something is arsenical then it bemoan the vanni. If the shelley equalise the lishe then the lishe is dour. If something exempt the shelley then the shelley bemoan the lishe. If the vanni exempt the lishe and the vanni equalise the keenan then the keenan bemoan the shelley. The lishe equalise the lishe.", "logic": "\nExempt(keenan, shelley)\nnot Arsenical(keenan)\nnot Equalise(vanni, keenan)\nEqualise(vanni, lishe)\nnot Exempt(vanni, shelley)\nDour(vanni)\nArsenical(vanni)\nnot Bemoan(vanni, shelley)\nBemoan(shelley, keenan)\nEqualise(lishe, vanni)\nEqualise(lishe, shelley)\nnot Exempt(lishe, vanni)\nTheoretic(lishe)\nArsenical(lishe)\nBemoan(lishe, keenan)\nBemoan(lishe, vanni)\nnot Equalise(lishe, vanni) -> Equalise(lishe, keenan)\nforall x (Bemoan(x, lishe) -> Equalise(x, lishe))\nforall x (Arsenical(x) -> Bemoan(x, vanni))\nEqualise(shelley, lishe) -> Dour(lishe)\nforall x (Exempt(x, shelley) -> Bemoan(shelley, lishe))\nExempt(vanni, lishe) and Equalise(vanni, keenan) -> Bemoan(keenan, shelley)\n\nEqualise(lishe, lishe)\n\nforall x (Bemoan(x, lishe) -> Equalise(x, lishe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The pier auction the roland. The pier is not arboriform. The allegra does not chase the pier. The allegra terrasse the petey. The allegra does not eat the roland. The allegra is katari. The allegra is arboriform. The allegra does not need the roland. The roland oxidize the pier. The petey terrasse the allegra. The petey terrasse the roland. The petey does not eat the allegra. The petey is keen. The petey is arboriform. The petey oxidize the pier. The petey oxidize the allegra. If the petey does not chase the allegra then the petey terrasse the pier. If something oxidize the petey then it terrasse the petey. If something is arboriform then it oxidize the allegra. If the roland terrasse the petey then the petey is katari. If something auction the roland then the roland oxidize the petey. If the allegra auction the petey and the allegra terrasse the pier then the pier oxidize the roland. The pier does not need the roland.", "logic": "\nAuction(pier, roland)\nnot Arboriform(pier)\nnot Terrasse(allegra, pier)\nTerrasse(allegra, petey)\nnot Auction(allegra, roland)\nKatari(allegra)\nArboriform(allegra)\nnot Oxidize(allegra, roland)\nOxidize(roland, pier)\nTerrasse(petey, allegra)\nTerrasse(petey, roland)\nnot Auction(petey, allegra)\nKeen(petey)\nArboriform(petey)\nOxidize(petey, pier)\nOxidize(petey, allegra)\nnot Terrasse(petey, allegra) -> Terrasse(petey, pier)\nforall x (Oxidize(x, petey) -> Terrasse(x, petey))\nforall x (Arboriform(x) -> Oxidize(x, allegra))\nTerrasse(roland, petey) -> Katari(petey)\nforall x (Auction(x, roland) -> Oxidize(roland, petey))\nAuction(allegra, petey) and Terrasse(allegra, pier) -> Oxidize(pier, roland)\n\nnot Oxidize(pier, roland)\n\nAuction(allegra, petey) and Terrasse(allegra, pier) -> Oxidize(pier, roland) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The andriana coerce the misha. The andriana is not mangey. The gale does not chase the andriana. The gale slow the kally. The gale does not eat the misha. The gale is vaporish. The gale is mangey. The gale does not need the misha. The misha clop the andriana. The kally slow the gale. The kally slow the misha. The kally does not eat the gale. The kally is exsanguine. The kally is mangey. The kally clop the andriana. The kally clop the gale. If the kally does not chase the gale then the kally slow the andriana. If something clop the kally then it slow the kally. If something is mangey then it clop the gale. If the misha slow the kally then the kally is vaporish. If something coerce the misha then the misha clop the kally. If the gale coerce the kally and the gale slow the andriana then the andriana clop the misha. The andriana clop the gale.", "logic": "\nCoerce(andriana, misha)\nnot Mangey(andriana)\nnot Slow(gale, andriana)\nSlow(gale, kally)\nnot Coerce(gale, misha)\nVaporish(gale)\nMangey(gale)\nnot Clop(gale, misha)\nClop(misha, andriana)\nSlow(kally, gale)\nSlow(kally, misha)\nnot Coerce(kally, gale)\nExsanguine(kally)\nMangey(kally)\nClop(kally, andriana)\nClop(kally, gale)\nnot Slow(kally, gale) -> Slow(kally, andriana)\nforall x (Clop(x, kally) -> Slow(x, kally))\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> Clop(x, gale))\nSlow(misha, kally) -> Vaporish(kally)\nforall x (Coerce(x, misha) -> Clop(misha, kally))\nCoerce(gale, kally) and Slow(gale, andriana) -> Clop(andriana, misha)\n\nClop(andriana, gale)\n\nforall x (Mangey(x) -> Clop(x, gale)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The wang load the enriqueta. The wang is not roan. The janie does not chase the wang. The janie disagree the catherin. The janie does not eat the enriqueta. The janie is briton. The janie is roan. The janie does not need the enriqueta. The enriqueta sleek the wang. The catherin disagree the janie. The catherin disagree the enriqueta. The catherin does not eat the janie. The catherin is moderato. The catherin is roan. The catherin sleek the wang. The catherin sleek the janie. If the catherin does not chase the janie then the catherin disagree the wang. If something sleek the catherin then it disagree the catherin. If something is roan then it sleek the janie. If the enriqueta disagree the catherin then the catherin is briton. If something load the enriqueta then the enriqueta sleek the catherin. If the janie load the catherin and the janie disagree the wang then the wang sleek the enriqueta. The wang is not big.", "logic": "\nLoad(wang, enriqueta)\nnot Roan(wang)\nnot Disagree(janie, wang)\nDisagree(janie, catherin)\nnot Load(janie, enriqueta)\nBriton(janie)\nRoan(janie)\nnot Sleek(janie, enriqueta)\nSleek(enriqueta, wang)\nDisagree(catherin, janie)\nDisagree(catherin, enriqueta)\nnot Load(catherin, janie)\nModerato(catherin)\nRoan(catherin)\nSleek(catherin, wang)\nSleek(catherin, janie)\nnot Disagree(catherin, janie) -> Disagree(catherin, wang)\nforall x (Sleek(x, catherin) -> Disagree(x, catherin))\nforall x (Roan(x) -> Sleek(x, janie))\nDisagree(enriqueta, catherin) -> Briton(catherin)\nforall x (Load(x, enriqueta) -> Sleek(enriqueta, catherin))\nLoad(janie, catherin) and Disagree(janie, wang) -> Sleek(wang, enriqueta)\n\nnot Big(wang)\n\nnot Big(wang) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The stephani improve the becca. The stephani is not coccoid. The urbain does not chase the stephani. The urbain adhere the merola. The urbain does not eat the becca. The urbain is topless. The urbain is coccoid. The urbain does not need the becca. The becca overwinter the stephani. The merola adhere the urbain. The merola adhere the becca. The merola does not eat the urbain. The merola is outgoing. The merola is coccoid. The merola overwinter the stephani. The merola overwinter the urbain. If the merola does not chase the urbain then the merola adhere the stephani. If something overwinter the merola then it adhere the merola. If something is coccoid then it overwinter the urbain. If the becca adhere the merola then the merola is topless. If something improve the becca then the becca overwinter the merola. If the urbain improve the merola and the urbain adhere the stephani then the stephani overwinter the becca. The merola improve the merola.", "logic": "\nImprove(stephani, becca)\nnot Coccoid(stephani)\nnot Adhere(urbain, stephani)\nAdhere(urbain, merola)\nnot Improve(urbain, becca)\nTopless(urbain)\nCoccoid(urbain)\nnot Overwinter(urbain, becca)\nOverwinter(becca, stephani)\nAdhere(merola, urbain)\nAdhere(merola, becca)\nnot Improve(merola, urbain)\nOutgoing(merola)\nCoccoid(merola)\nOverwinter(merola, stephani)\nOverwinter(merola, urbain)\nnot Adhere(merola, urbain) -> Adhere(merola, stephani)\nforall x (Overwinter(x, merola) -> Adhere(x, merola))\nforall x (Coccoid(x) -> Overwinter(x, urbain))\nAdhere(becca, merola) -> Topless(merola)\nforall x (Improve(x, becca) -> Overwinter(becca, merola))\nImprove(urbain, merola) and Adhere(urbain, stephani) -> Overwinter(stephani, becca)\n\nImprove(merola, merola)\n\nImprove(merola, merola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The lynett park the esma. The lynett is not famed. The tildy does not chase the lynett. The tildy conspire the sianna. The tildy does not eat the esma. The tildy is sterilized. The tildy is famed. The tildy does not need the esma. The esma underwrite the lynett. The sianna conspire the tildy. The sianna conspire the esma. The sianna does not eat the tildy. The sianna is astragalar. The sianna is famed. The sianna underwrite the lynett. The sianna underwrite the tildy. If the sianna does not chase the tildy then the sianna conspire the lynett. If something underwrite the sianna then it conspire the sianna. If something is famed then it underwrite the tildy. If the esma conspire the sianna then the sianna is sterilized. If something park the esma then the esma underwrite the sianna. If the tildy park the sianna and the tildy conspire the lynett then the lynett underwrite the esma. The esma is not sterilized.", "logic": "\nPark(lynett, esma)\nnot Famed(lynett)\nnot Conspire(tildy, lynett)\nConspire(tildy, sianna)\nnot Park(tildy, esma)\nSterilized(tildy)\nFamed(tildy)\nnot Underwrite(tildy, esma)\nUnderwrite(esma, lynett)\nConspire(sianna, tildy)\nConspire(sianna, esma)\nnot Park(sianna, tildy)\nAstragalar(sianna)\nFamed(sianna)\nUnderwrite(sianna, lynett)\nUnderwrite(sianna, tildy)\nnot Conspire(sianna, tildy) -> Conspire(sianna, lynett)\nforall x (Underwrite(x, sianna) -> Conspire(x, sianna))\nforall x (Famed(x) -> Underwrite(x, tildy))\nConspire(esma, sianna) -> Sterilized(sianna)\nforall x (Park(x, esma) -> Underwrite(esma, sianna))\nPark(tildy, sianna) and Conspire(tildy, lynett) -> Underwrite(lynett, esma)\n\nnot Sterilized(esma)\n\nnot Sterilized(esma) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "The donni traumatize the nester. The donni is not spiny. The upton does not chase the donni. The upton abash the marga. The upton does not eat the nester. The upton is amoeban. The upton is spiny. The upton does not need the nester. The nester bituminize the donni. The marga abash the upton. The marga abash the nester. The marga does not eat the upton. The marga is autoimmune. The marga is spiny. The marga bituminize the donni. The marga bituminize the upton. If the marga does not chase the upton then the marga abash the donni. If something bituminize the marga then it abash the marga. If something is spiny then it bituminize the upton. If the nester abash the marga then the marga is amoeban. If something traumatize the nester then the nester bituminize the marga. If the upton traumatize the marga and the upton abash the donni then the donni bituminize the nester. The nester is kind.", "logic": "\nTraumatize(donni, nester)\nnot Spiny(donni)\nnot Abash(upton, donni)\nAbash(upton, marga)\nnot Traumatize(upton, nester)\nAmoeban(upton)\nSpiny(upton)\nnot Bituminize(upton, nester)\nBituminize(nester, donni)\nAbash(marga, upton)\nAbash(marga, nester)\nnot Traumatize(marga, upton)\nAutoimmune(marga)\nSpiny(marga)\nBituminize(marga, donni)\nBituminize(marga, upton)\nnot Abash(marga, upton) -> Abash(marga, donni)\nforall x (Bituminize(x, marga) -> Abash(x, marga))\nforall x (Spiny(x) -> Bituminize(x, upton))\nAbash(nester, marga) -> Amoeban(marga)\nforall x (Traumatize(x, nester) -> Bituminize(nester, marga))\nTraumatize(upton, marga) and Abash(upton, donni) -> Bituminize(donni, nester)\n\nKind(nester)\n\nKind(nester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-823"} {"premises": "Opal is romance. Opal is celibate. Opal is not sinkable. Hew is not mishnaic. Hew is grown. Hew is tactical. Lelah is celibate. Quiet people are mishnaic. If Opal is tactical then Opal is not mishnaic. If someone is tactical and not grown then they are sinkable. Nice, mishnaic people are sinkable. If someone is romance and grown then they are sinkable. All celibate people are romance. Big people are celibate. If someone is grown and not mishnaic then they are celibate. Opal is not sinkable.", "logic": "\nRomance(opal)\nCelibate(opal)\nnot Sinkable(opal)\nnot Mishnaic(hew)\nGrown(hew)\nTactical(hew)\nCelibate(lelah)\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nTactical(opal) -> not Mishnaic(opal)\nforall x (Tactical(x) and not Grown(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Tactical(x) and Mishnaic(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Romance(x) and Grown(x) -> Sinkable(x))\nforall x (Celibate(x) -> Romance(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Celibate(x))\nforall x (Grown(x) and not Mishnaic(x) -> Celibate(x))\n\nnot Sinkable(opal)\n\ntherefore not Sinkable(opal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Hilliard is federated. Hilliard is hexangular. Hilliard is not milch. Steffen is not subjective. Steffen is nauseous. Steffen is sclerosed. Carolann is hexangular. Quiet people are subjective. If Hilliard is sclerosed then Hilliard is not subjective. If someone is sclerosed and not nauseous then they are milch. Nice, endermatic people are milch. If someone is federated and nauseous then they are milch. All hexangular people are federated. Big people are hexangular. If someone is nauseous and not subjective then they are hexangular. Steffen is not sclerosed.", "logic": "\nFederated(hilliard)\nHexangular(hilliard)\nnot Milch(hilliard)\nnot Subjective(steffen)\nNauseous(steffen)\nSclerosed(steffen)\nHexangular(carolann)\nforall x (Endermatic(x) -> Subjective(x))\nSclerosed(hilliard) -> not Subjective(hilliard)\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) and not Nauseous(x) -> Milch(x))\nforall x (Sclerosed(x) and Endermatic(x) -> Milch(x))\nforall x (Federated(x) and Nauseous(x) -> Milch(x))\nforall x (Hexangular(x) -> Federated(x))\nforall x (Subjective(x) -> Hexangular(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) and not Subjective(x) -> Hexangular(x))\n\nnot Sclerosed(steffen)\n\ntherefore Sclerosed(steffen)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Libby is dual. Libby is laggard. Libby is not coaxal. Fannie is not derisive. Fannie is preeminent. Fannie is cotyloid. Stephan is laggard. Quiet people are derisive. If Libby is cotyloid then Libby is not derisive. If someone is cotyloid and not preeminent then they are coaxal. Nice, apostate people are coaxal. If someone is dual and preeminent then they are coaxal. All laggard people are dual. Big people are laggard. If someone is preeminent and not derisive then they are laggard. Fannie is laggard.", "logic": "\nDual(libby)\nLaggard(libby)\nnot Coaxal(libby)\nnot Derisive(fannie)\nPreeminent(fannie)\nCotyloid(fannie)\nLaggard(stephan)\nforall x (Apostate(x) -> Derisive(x))\nCotyloid(libby) -> not Derisive(libby)\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) and not Preeminent(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Cotyloid(x) and Apostate(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Dual(x) and Preeminent(x) -> Coaxal(x))\nforall x (Laggard(x) -> Dual(x))\nforall x (Derisive(x) -> Laggard(x))\nforall x (Preeminent(x) and not Derisive(x) -> Laggard(x))\n\nLaggard(fannie)\n\nPreeminent(fannie) and not Derisive(fannie) and forall x (Preeminent(x) and not Derisive(x) -> Laggard(x)) -> therefore Laggard(fannie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Sophronia is unsleeping. Sophronia is unartistic. Sophronia is not lined. Kirsteni is not naive. Kirsteni is draped. Kirsteni is blotched. Marinna is unartistic. Quiet people are naive. If Sophronia is blotched then Sophronia is not naive. If someone is blotched and not draped then they are lined. Nice, paunchy people are lined. If someone is unsleeping and draped then they are lined. All unartistic people are unsleeping. Big people are unartistic. If someone is draped and not naive then they are unartistic. Kirsteni is not unartistic.", "logic": "\nUnsleeping(sophronia)\nUnartistic(sophronia)\nnot Lined(sophronia)\nnot Naive(kirsteni)\nDraped(kirsteni)\nBlotched(kirsteni)\nUnartistic(marinna)\nforall x (Paunchy(x) -> Naive(x))\nBlotched(sophronia) -> not Naive(sophronia)\nforall x (Blotched(x) and not Draped(x) -> Lined(x))\nforall x (Blotched(x) and Paunchy(x) -> Lined(x))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) and Draped(x) -> Lined(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) -> Unsleeping(x))\nforall x (Naive(x) -> Unartistic(x))\nforall x (Draped(x) and not Naive(x) -> Unartistic(x))\n\nnot Unartistic(kirsteni)\n\nDraped(kirsteni) and not Naive(kirsteni) and forall x (Draped(x) and not Naive(x) -> Unartistic(x)) -> therefore Unartistic(kirsteni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Bernete is uniparous. Bernete is infrasonic. Bernete is not tutelary. Cynthie is not laotian. Cynthie is impervious. Cynthie is coercive. Fanya is infrasonic. Quiet people are laotian. If Bernete is coercive then Bernete is not laotian. If someone is coercive and not impervious then they are tutelary. Nice, polluted people are tutelary. If someone is uniparous and impervious then they are tutelary. All infrasonic people are uniparous. Big people are infrasonic. If someone is impervious and not laotian then they are infrasonic. Cynthie is uniparous.", "logic": "\nUniparous(bernete)\nInfrasonic(bernete)\nnot Tutelary(bernete)\nnot Laotian(cynthie)\nImpervious(cynthie)\nCoercive(cynthie)\nInfrasonic(fanya)\nforall x (Polluted(x) -> Laotian(x))\nCoercive(bernete) -> not Laotian(bernete)\nforall x (Coercive(x) and not Impervious(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Coercive(x) and Polluted(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Uniparous(x) and Impervious(x) -> Tutelary(x))\nforall x (Infrasonic(x) -> Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Laotian(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\nforall x (Impervious(x) and not Laotian(x) -> Infrasonic(x))\n\nUniparous(cynthie)\n\nImpervious(cynthie) and not Laotian(cynthie) and forall x (Impervious(x) and not Laotian(x) -> Infrasonic(x)) -> therefore Infrasonic(cynthie) Infrasonic(cynthie) and forall x (Infrasonic(x) -> Uniparous(x)) -> therefore Uniparous(cynthie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Grace is oppressive. Grace is biyearly. Grace is not faveolate. Daisie is not donnean. Daisie is exogenic. Daisie is unwished. Florida is biyearly. Quiet people are donnean. If Grace is unwished then Grace is not donnean. If someone is unwished and not exogenic then they are faveolate. Nice, bathyal people are faveolate. If someone is oppressive and exogenic then they are faveolate. All biyearly people are oppressive. Big people are biyearly. If someone is exogenic and not donnean then they are biyearly. Daisie is not oppressive.", "logic": "\nOppressive(grace)\nBiyearly(grace)\nnot Faveolate(grace)\nnot Donnean(daisie)\nExogenic(daisie)\nUnwished(daisie)\nBiyearly(florida)\nforall x (Bathyal(x) -> Donnean(x))\nUnwished(grace) -> not Donnean(grace)\nforall x (Unwished(x) and not Exogenic(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Unwished(x) and Bathyal(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Oppressive(x) and Exogenic(x) -> Faveolate(x))\nforall x (Biyearly(x) -> Oppressive(x))\nforall x (Donnean(x) -> Biyearly(x))\nforall x (Exogenic(x) and not Donnean(x) -> Biyearly(x))\n\nnot Oppressive(daisie)\n\nExogenic(daisie) and not Donnean(daisie) and forall x (Exogenic(x) and not Donnean(x) -> Biyearly(x)) -> therefore Biyearly(daisie) Biyearly(daisie) and forall x (Biyearly(x) -> Oppressive(x)) -> therefore Oppressive(daisie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Mitchell is papery. Mitchell is wintery. Mitchell is not vapid. Merell is not evanescent. Merell is saprobic. Merell is jetting. Eleanore is wintery. Quiet people are evanescent. If Mitchell is jetting then Mitchell is not evanescent. If someone is jetting and not saprobic then they are vapid. Nice, crowning people are vapid. If someone is papery and saprobic then they are vapid. All wintery people are papery. Big people are wintery. If someone is saprobic and not evanescent then they are wintery. Merell is vapid.", "logic": "\nPapery(mitchell)\nWintery(mitchell)\nnot Vapid(mitchell)\nnot Evanescent(merell)\nSaprobic(merell)\nJetting(merell)\nWintery(eleanore)\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Evanescent(x))\nJetting(mitchell) -> not Evanescent(mitchell)\nforall x (Jetting(x) and not Saprobic(x) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Jetting(x) and Crowning(x) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Papery(x) and Saprobic(x) -> Vapid(x))\nforall x (Wintery(x) -> Papery(x))\nforall x (Evanescent(x) -> Wintery(x))\nforall x (Saprobic(x) and not Evanescent(x) -> Wintery(x))\n\nVapid(merell)\n\nSaprobic(merell) and not Evanescent(merell) and forall x (Saprobic(x) and not Evanescent(x) -> Wintery(x)) -> therefore Wintery(merell) Wintery(merell) and forall x (Wintery(x) -> Papery(x)) -> therefore Papery(merell) Papery(merell) and Saprobic(merell) and forall x (Papery(x) and Saprobic(x) -> Vapid(x)) -> therefore Vapid(merell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Lazarus is potent. Lazarus is frivolous. Lazarus is not panoptical. Cass is not moorish. Cass is heartfelt. Cass is inane. Malorie is frivolous. Quiet people are moorish. If Lazarus is inane then Lazarus is not moorish. If someone is inane and not heartfelt then they are panoptical. Nice, chaffy people are panoptical. If someone is potent and heartfelt then they are panoptical. All frivolous people are potent. Big people are frivolous. If someone is heartfelt and not moorish then they are frivolous. Cass is not panoptical.", "logic": "\nPotent(lazarus)\nFrivolous(lazarus)\nnot Panoptical(lazarus)\nnot Moorish(cass)\nHeartfelt(cass)\nInane(cass)\nFrivolous(malorie)\nforall x (Chaffy(x) -> Moorish(x))\nInane(lazarus) -> not Moorish(lazarus)\nforall x (Inane(x) and not Heartfelt(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Inane(x) and Chaffy(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Potent(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Panoptical(x))\nforall x (Frivolous(x) -> Potent(x))\nforall x (Moorish(x) -> Frivolous(x))\nforall x (Heartfelt(x) and not Moorish(x) -> Frivolous(x))\n\nnot Panoptical(cass)\n\nHeartfelt(cass) and not Moorish(cass) and forall x (Heartfelt(x) and not Moorish(x) -> Frivolous(x)) -> therefore Frivolous(cass) Frivolous(cass) and forall x (Frivolous(x) -> Potent(x)) -> therefore Potent(cass) Potent(cass) and Heartfelt(cass) and forall x (Potent(x) and Heartfelt(x) -> Panoptical(x)) -> therefore Panoptical(cass)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Pyotr is clad. Pyotr is enabling. Pyotr is not underbred. Joelly is not mandean. Joelly is nomothetic. Joelly is mansard. Edmond is enabling. Quiet people are mandean. If Pyotr is mansard then Pyotr is not mandean. If someone is mansard and not nomothetic then they are underbred. Nice, tahitian people are underbred. If someone is clad and nomothetic then they are underbred. All enabling people are clad. Big people are enabling. If someone is nomothetic and not mandean then they are enabling. Pyotr is not mandean.", "logic": "\nClad(pyotr)\nEnabling(pyotr)\nnot Underbred(pyotr)\nnot Mandean(joelly)\nNomothetic(joelly)\nMansard(joelly)\nEnabling(edmond)\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> Mandean(x))\nMansard(pyotr) -> not Mandean(pyotr)\nforall x (Mansard(x) and not Nomothetic(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Mansard(x) and Tahitian(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Clad(x) and Nomothetic(x) -> Underbred(x))\nforall x (Enabling(x) -> Clad(x))\nforall x (Mandean(x) -> Enabling(x))\nforall x (Nomothetic(x) and not Mandean(x) -> Enabling(x))\n\nnot Mandean(pyotr)\n\nforall x (Tahitian(x) -> Mandean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Mildred is homing. Mildred is lxiv. Mildred is not traumatic. Ibbie is not pyramidic. Ibbie is twilit. Ibbie is metabolic. Margette is lxiv. Quiet people are pyramidic. If Mildred is metabolic then Mildred is not pyramidic. If someone is metabolic and not twilit then they are traumatic. Nice, awned people are traumatic. If someone is homing and twilit then they are traumatic. All lxiv people are homing. Big people are lxiv. If someone is twilit and not pyramidic then they are lxiv. Margette is pyramidic.", "logic": "\nHoming(mildred)\nLxiv(mildred)\nnot Traumatic(mildred)\nnot Pyramidic(ibbie)\nTwilit(ibbie)\nMetabolic(ibbie)\nLxiv(margette)\nforall x (Awned(x) -> Pyramidic(x))\nMetabolic(mildred) -> not Pyramidic(mildred)\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and not Twilit(x) -> Traumatic(x))\nforall x (Metabolic(x) and Awned(x) -> Traumatic(x))\nforall x (Homing(x) and Twilit(x) -> Traumatic(x))\nforall x (Lxiv(x) -> Homing(x))\nforall x (Pyramidic(x) -> Lxiv(x))\nforall x (Twilit(x) and not Pyramidic(x) -> Lxiv(x))\n\nPyramidic(margette)\n\nforall x (Awned(x) -> Pyramidic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Kaster is inept. Kaster is general. Kaster is not moonless. Cassy is not parched. Cassy is retracted. Cassy is nontaxable. Barnett is general. Quiet people are parched. If Kaster is nontaxable then Kaster is not parched. If someone is nontaxable and not retracted then they are moonless. Nice, premium people are moonless. If someone is inept and retracted then they are moonless. All general people are inept. Big people are general. If someone is retracted and not parched then they are general. Barnett is not moonless.", "logic": "\nInept(kaster)\nGeneral(kaster)\nnot Moonless(kaster)\nnot Parched(cassy)\nRetracted(cassy)\nNontaxable(cassy)\nGeneral(barnett)\nforall x (Premium(x) -> Parched(x))\nNontaxable(kaster) -> not Parched(kaster)\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and not Retracted(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and Premium(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (Inept(x) and Retracted(x) -> Moonless(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Inept(x))\nforall x (Parched(x) -> General(x))\nforall x (Retracted(x) and not Parched(x) -> General(x))\n\nnot Moonless(barnett)\n\nforall x (Nontaxable(x) and not Retracted(x) -> Moonless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Ferne is recursive. Ferne is crooked. Ferne is not tentacular. Sheldon is not gladsome. Sheldon is humorless. Sheldon is charcoal. Dane is crooked. Quiet people are gladsome. If Ferne is charcoal then Ferne is not gladsome. If someone is charcoal and not humorless then they are tentacular. Nice, urceolate people are tentacular. If someone is recursive and humorless then they are tentacular. All crooked people are recursive. Big people are crooked. If someone is humorless and not gladsome then they are crooked. Sheldon is urceolate.", "logic": "\nRecursive(ferne)\nCrooked(ferne)\nnot Tentacular(ferne)\nnot Gladsome(sheldon)\nHumorless(sheldon)\nCharcoal(sheldon)\nCrooked(dane)\nforall x (Urceolate(x) -> Gladsome(x))\nCharcoal(ferne) -> not Gladsome(ferne)\nforall x (Charcoal(x) and not Humorless(x) -> Tentacular(x))\nforall x (Charcoal(x) and Urceolate(x) -> Tentacular(x))\nforall x (Recursive(x) and Humorless(x) -> Tentacular(x))\nforall x (Crooked(x) -> Recursive(x))\nforall x (Gladsome(x) -> Crooked(x))\nforall x (Humorless(x) and not Gladsome(x) -> Crooked(x))\n\nUrceolate(sheldon)\n\nUrceolate(sheldon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Catrina is haploid. Catrina is metalloid. Catrina is not artful. Seka is not provoking. Seka is eremitical. Seka is clipped. Danyelle is metalloid. Quiet people are provoking. If Catrina is clipped then Catrina is not provoking. If someone is clipped and not eremitical then they are artful. Nice, purposeful people are artful. If someone is haploid and eremitical then they are artful. All metalloid people are haploid. Big people are metalloid. If someone is eremitical and not provoking then they are metalloid. Catrina is not clipped.", "logic": "\nHaploid(catrina)\nMetalloid(catrina)\nnot Artful(catrina)\nnot Provoking(seka)\nEremitical(seka)\nClipped(seka)\nMetalloid(danyelle)\nforall x (Purposeful(x) -> Provoking(x))\nClipped(catrina) -> not Provoking(catrina)\nforall x (Clipped(x) and not Eremitical(x) -> Artful(x))\nforall x (Clipped(x) and Purposeful(x) -> Artful(x))\nforall x (Haploid(x) and Eremitical(x) -> Artful(x))\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Haploid(x))\nforall x (Provoking(x) -> Metalloid(x))\nforall x (Eremitical(x) and not Provoking(x) -> Metalloid(x))\n\nnot Clipped(catrina)\n\nnot Clipped(catrina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Thaxter is upstairs. Thaxter is swampy. Thaxter is not unhealed. Claudette is not cosmogonic. Claudette is quartzose. Claudette is contralto. Sindee is swampy. Quiet people are cosmogonic. If Thaxter is contralto then Thaxter is not cosmogonic. If someone is contralto and not quartzose then they are unhealed. Nice, causeless people are unhealed. If someone is upstairs and quartzose then they are unhealed. All swampy people are upstairs. Big people are swampy. If someone is quartzose and not cosmogonic then they are swampy. Thaxter is causeless.", "logic": "\nUpstairs(thaxter)\nSwampy(thaxter)\nnot Unhealed(thaxter)\nnot Cosmogonic(claudette)\nQuartzose(claudette)\nContralto(claudette)\nSwampy(sindee)\nforall x (Causeless(x) -> Cosmogonic(x))\nContralto(thaxter) -> not Cosmogonic(thaxter)\nforall x (Contralto(x) and not Quartzose(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Contralto(x) and Causeless(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Upstairs(x) and Quartzose(x) -> Unhealed(x))\nforall x (Swampy(x) -> Upstairs(x))\nforall x (Cosmogonic(x) -> Swampy(x))\nforall x (Quartzose(x) and not Cosmogonic(x) -> Swampy(x))\n\nCauseless(thaxter)\n\nCauseless(thaxter) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Godfry is portentous. Godfry is overall. Godfry is not percipient. Mozelle is not racial. Mozelle is brocaded. Mozelle is major. Aprilette is overall. Quiet people are racial. If Godfry is major then Godfry is not racial. If someone is major and not brocaded then they are percipient. Nice, sanguinary people are percipient. If someone is portentous and brocaded then they are percipient. All overall people are portentous. Big people are overall. If someone is brocaded and not racial then they are overall. Aprilette is not major.", "logic": "\nPortentous(godfry)\nOverall(godfry)\nnot Percipient(godfry)\nnot Racial(mozelle)\nBrocaded(mozelle)\nMajor(mozelle)\nOverall(aprilette)\nforall x (Sanguinary(x) -> Racial(x))\nMajor(godfry) -> not Racial(godfry)\nforall x (Major(x) and not Brocaded(x) -> Percipient(x))\nforall x (Major(x) and Sanguinary(x) -> Percipient(x))\nforall x (Portentous(x) and Brocaded(x) -> Percipient(x))\nforall x (Overall(x) -> Portentous(x))\nforall x (Racial(x) -> Overall(x))\nforall x (Brocaded(x) and not Racial(x) -> Overall(x))\n\nnot Major(aprilette)\n\nnot Major(aprilette) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Corrianne is uricosuric. Corrianne is reticulate. Corrianne is not unicuspid. Ursola is not annulated. Ursola is playful. Ursola is robust. Markos is reticulate. Quiet people are annulated. If Corrianne is robust then Corrianne is not annulated. If someone is robust and not playful then they are unicuspid. Nice, searching people are unicuspid. If someone is uricosuric and playful then they are unicuspid. All reticulate people are uricosuric. Big people are reticulate. If someone is playful and not annulated then they are reticulate. Markos is playful.", "logic": "\nUricosuric(corrianne)\nReticulate(corrianne)\nnot Unicuspid(corrianne)\nnot Annulated(ursola)\nPlayful(ursola)\nRobust(ursola)\nReticulate(markos)\nforall x (Searching(x) -> Annulated(x))\nRobust(corrianne) -> not Annulated(corrianne)\nforall x (Robust(x) and not Playful(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Robust(x) and Searching(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Uricosuric(x) and Playful(x) -> Unicuspid(x))\nforall x (Reticulate(x) -> Uricosuric(x))\nforall x (Annulated(x) -> Reticulate(x))\nforall x (Playful(x) and not Annulated(x) -> Reticulate(x))\n\nPlayful(markos)\n\nPlayful(markos) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1121"} {"premises": "Darren is petalous. Frankie is yogic. If something is authentic then it is communist. If something is petalous and communist then it is yogic. All earthen things are yogic. Nice things are monoclinal. Green, yogic things are communist. All yogic things are monoclinal. All petalous things are communist. If something is earthen and yogic then it is petalous. Darren is petalous.", "logic": "\nPetalous(darren)\nYogic(frankie)\nforall x (Authentic(x) -> Communist(x))\nforall x (Petalous(x) and Communist(x) -> Yogic(x))\nforall x (Earthen(x) -> Yogic(x))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Monoclinal(x))\nforall x (Petalous(x) and Yogic(x) -> Communist(x))\nforall x (Yogic(x) -> Monoclinal(x))\nforall x (Petalous(x) -> Communist(x))\nforall x (Earthen(x) and Yogic(x) -> Petalous(x))\n\nPetalous(darren)\n\ntherefore Petalous(darren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Rosie is cerous. Marylee is alarmed. If something is attenuated then it is waterless. If something is cerous and waterless then it is alarmed. All warning things are alarmed. Nice things are cleavable. Green, alarmed things are waterless. All alarmed things are cleavable. All cerous things are waterless. If something is warning and alarmed then it is cerous. Marylee is not alarmed.", "logic": "\nCerous(rosie)\nAlarmed(marylee)\nforall x (Attenuated(x) -> Waterless(x))\nforall x (Cerous(x) and Waterless(x) -> Alarmed(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) -> Alarmed(x))\nforall x (Alarmed(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Cerous(x) and Alarmed(x) -> Waterless(x))\nforall x (Alarmed(x) -> Cleavable(x))\nforall x (Cerous(x) -> Waterless(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and Alarmed(x) -> Cerous(x))\n\nnot Alarmed(marylee)\n\ntherefore Alarmed(marylee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Milka is mesmerized. Oliver is pontifical. If something is outright then it is lovesome. If something is mesmerized and lovesome then it is pontifical. All curious things are pontifical. Nice things are coral. Green, pontifical things are lovesome. All pontifical things are coral. All mesmerized things are lovesome. If something is curious and pontifical then it is mesmerized. Milka is lovesome.", "logic": "\nMesmerized(milka)\nPontifical(oliver)\nforall x (Outright(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Lovesome(x) -> Pontifical(x))\nforall x (Curious(x) -> Pontifical(x))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) and Pontifical(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Pontifical(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Mesmerized(x) -> Lovesome(x))\nforall x (Curious(x) and Pontifical(x) -> Mesmerized(x))\n\nLovesome(milka)\n\nMesmerized(milka) and forall x (Mesmerized(x) -> Lovesome(x)) -> therefore Lovesome(milka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Donny is liliaceous. Romain is authorized. If something is locomotive then it is delphian. If something is liliaceous and delphian then it is authorized. All flowering things are authorized. Nice things are stern. Green, authorized things are delphian. All authorized things are stern. All liliaceous things are delphian. If something is flowering and authorized then it is liliaceous. Romain is not stern.", "logic": "\nLiliaceous(donny)\nAuthorized(romain)\nforall x (Locomotive(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) and Delphian(x) -> Authorized(x))\nforall x (Flowering(x) -> Authorized(x))\nforall x (Authorized(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) and Authorized(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Authorized(x) -> Stern(x))\nforall x (Liliaceous(x) -> Delphian(x))\nforall x (Flowering(x) and Authorized(x) -> Liliaceous(x))\n\nnot Stern(romain)\n\nAuthorized(romain) and forall x (Authorized(x) -> Stern(x)) -> therefore Stern(romain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Reggi is tight. Lefty is contraband. If something is mimic then it is avertible. If something is tight and avertible then it is contraband. All jesuit things are contraband. Nice things are fitting. Green, contraband things are avertible. All contraband things are fitting. All tight things are avertible. If something is jesuit and contraband then it is tight. Reggi is contraband.", "logic": "\nTight(reggi)\nContraband(lefty)\nforall x (Mimic(x) -> Avertible(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and Avertible(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) -> Contraband(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) -> Fitting(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) and Contraband(x) -> Avertible(x))\nforall x (Contraband(x) -> Fitting(x))\nforall x (Tight(x) -> Avertible(x))\nforall x (Jesuit(x) and Contraband(x) -> Tight(x))\n\nContraband(reggi)\n\nTight(reggi) and forall x (Tight(x) -> Avertible(x)) -> therefore Avertible(reggi) Tight(reggi) and Avertible(reggi) and forall x (Tight(x) and Avertible(x) -> Contraband(x)) -> therefore Contraband(reggi)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Rhodia is asian. Lindie is sobering. If something is frowsty then it is philatelic. If something is asian and philatelic then it is sobering. All petulant things are sobering. Nice things are geographic. Green, sobering things are philatelic. All sobering things are geographic. All asian things are philatelic. If something is petulant and sobering then it is asian. Rhodia is not sobering.", "logic": "\nAsian(rhodia)\nSobering(lindie)\nforall x (Frowsty(x) -> Philatelic(x))\nforall x (Asian(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Sobering(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) -> Sobering(x))\nforall x (Sobering(x) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Asian(x) and Sobering(x) -> Philatelic(x))\nforall x (Sobering(x) -> Geographic(x))\nforall x (Asian(x) -> Philatelic(x))\nforall x (Petulant(x) and Sobering(x) -> Asian(x))\n\nnot Sobering(rhodia)\n\nAsian(rhodia) and forall x (Asian(x) -> Philatelic(x)) -> therefore Philatelic(rhodia) Asian(rhodia) and Philatelic(rhodia) and forall x (Asian(x) and Philatelic(x) -> Sobering(x)) -> therefore Sobering(rhodia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Leodora is hawkish. Harland is faustian. If something is bonkers then it is formidable. If something is hawkish and formidable then it is faustian. All sculptural things are faustian. Nice things are undefended. Green, faustian things are formidable. All faustian things are undefended. All hawkish things are formidable. If something is sculptural and faustian then it is hawkish. Leodora is undefended.", "logic": "\nHawkish(leodora)\nFaustian(harland)\nforall x (Bonkers(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and Formidable(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) -> Faustian(x))\nforall x (Faustian(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) and Faustian(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Faustian(x) -> Undefended(x))\nforall x (Hawkish(x) -> Formidable(x))\nforall x (Sculptural(x) and Faustian(x) -> Hawkish(x))\n\nUndefended(leodora)\n\nHawkish(leodora) and forall x (Hawkish(x) -> Formidable(x)) -> therefore Formidable(leodora) Hawkish(leodora) and Formidable(leodora) and forall x (Hawkish(x) and Formidable(x) -> Faustian(x)) -> therefore Faustian(leodora) Faustian(leodora) and forall x (Faustian(x) -> Undefended(x)) -> therefore Undefended(leodora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Arturo is fringy. Ilysa is urinary. If something is second then it is cultural. If something is fringy and cultural then it is urinary. All conductive things are urinary. Nice things are knifelike. Green, urinary things are cultural. All urinary things are knifelike. All fringy things are cultural. If something is conductive and urinary then it is fringy. Arturo is not knifelike.", "logic": "\nFringy(arturo)\nUrinary(ilysa)\nforall x (Second(x) -> Cultural(x))\nforall x (Fringy(x) and Cultural(x) -> Urinary(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) -> Urinary(x))\nforall x (Urinary(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Fringy(x) and Urinary(x) -> Cultural(x))\nforall x (Urinary(x) -> Knifelike(x))\nforall x (Fringy(x) -> Cultural(x))\nforall x (Conductive(x) and Urinary(x) -> Fringy(x))\n\nnot Knifelike(arturo)\n\nFringy(arturo) and forall x (Fringy(x) -> Cultural(x)) -> therefore Cultural(arturo) Fringy(arturo) and Cultural(arturo) and forall x (Fringy(x) and Cultural(x) -> Urinary(x)) -> therefore Urinary(arturo) Urinary(arturo) and forall x (Urinary(x) -> Knifelike(x)) -> therefore Knifelike(arturo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Merwin is employed. Yank is obsolete. If something is posthumous then it is frowsy. If something is employed and frowsy then it is obsolete. All yogistic things are obsolete. Nice things are delightful. Green, obsolete things are frowsy. All obsolete things are delightful. All employed things are frowsy. If something is yogistic and obsolete then it is employed. Yank is not employed.", "logic": "\nEmployed(merwin)\nObsolete(yank)\nforall x (Posthumous(x) -> Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) and Frowsy(x) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Yogistic(x) -> Obsolete(x))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) -> Delightful(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) and Obsolete(x) -> Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Obsolete(x) -> Delightful(x))\nforall x (Employed(x) -> Frowsy(x))\nforall x (Yogistic(x) and Obsolete(x) -> Employed(x))\n\nnot Employed(yank)\n\nforall x (Yogistic(x) and Obsolete(x) -> Employed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Briana is mesmerised. Jerold is bacillary. If something is exothermic then it is semiotic. If something is mesmerised and semiotic then it is bacillary. All detersive things are bacillary. Nice things are corrected. Green, bacillary things are semiotic. All bacillary things are corrected. All mesmerised things are semiotic. If something is detersive and bacillary then it is mesmerised. Jerold is semiotic.", "logic": "\nMesmerised(briana)\nBacillary(jerold)\nforall x (Exothermic(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and Semiotic(x) -> Bacillary(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) -> Bacillary(x))\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and Bacillary(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nforall x (Bacillary(x) -> Corrected(x))\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> Semiotic(x))\nforall x (Detersive(x) and Bacillary(x) -> Mesmerised(x))\n\nSemiotic(jerold)\n\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) and Bacillary(x) -> Semiotic(x)) <- forall x (Detersive(x) and Bacillary(x) -> Mesmerised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Marci is calceiform. Will is manque. If something is pectic then it is joking. If something is calceiform and joking then it is manque. All affirmable things are manque. Nice things are cespitose. Green, manque things are joking. All manque things are cespitose. All calceiform things are joking. If something is affirmable and manque then it is calceiform. Will is not smart.", "logic": "\nCalceiform(marci)\nManque(will)\nforall x (Pectic(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) and Joking(x) -> Manque(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) -> Manque(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) -> Cespitose(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) and Manque(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Manque(x) -> Cespitose(x))\nforall x (Calceiform(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Affirmable(x) and Manque(x) -> Calceiform(x))\n\nnot Smart(will)\n\nnot Smart(will) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Harv is bronchial. Lemuel is polyoicous. If something is unkeyed then it is cracking. If something is bronchial and cracking then it is polyoicous. All macho things are polyoicous. Nice things are stonelike. Green, polyoicous things are cracking. All polyoicous things are stonelike. All bronchial things are cracking. If something is macho and polyoicous then it is bronchial. Lemuel is macho.", "logic": "\nBronchial(harv)\nPolyoicous(lemuel)\nforall x (Unkeyed(x) -> Cracking(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) and Cracking(x) -> Polyoicous(x))\nforall x (Macho(x) -> Polyoicous(x))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) -> Stonelike(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) and Polyoicous(x) -> Cracking(x))\nforall x (Polyoicous(x) -> Stonelike(x))\nforall x (Bronchial(x) -> Cracking(x))\nforall x (Macho(x) and Polyoicous(x) -> Bronchial(x))\n\nMacho(lemuel)\n\nMacho(lemuel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Fulton is utile. Raye is umbilicate. If something is cognitive then it is keyless. If something is utile and keyless then it is umbilicate. All noticeable things are umbilicate. Nice things are singable. Green, umbilicate things are keyless. All umbilicate things are singable. All utile things are keyless. If something is noticeable and umbilicate then it is utile. Fulton is not noticeable.", "logic": "\nUtile(fulton)\nUmbilicate(raye)\nforall x (Cognitive(x) -> Keyless(x))\nforall x (Utile(x) and Keyless(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) -> Umbilicate(x))\nforall x (Umbilicate(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Utile(x) and Umbilicate(x) -> Keyless(x))\nforall x (Umbilicate(x) -> Singable(x))\nforall x (Utile(x) -> Keyless(x))\nforall x (Noticeable(x) and Umbilicate(x) -> Utile(x))\n\nnot Noticeable(fulton)\n\nnot Noticeable(fulton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Leonie is tedious. Ender is deceptive. If something is explicable then it is reasoned. If something is tedious and reasoned then it is deceptive. All forked things are deceptive. Nice things are haemal. Green, deceptive things are reasoned. All deceptive things are haemal. All tedious things are reasoned. If something is forked and deceptive then it is tedious. Ender is explicable.", "logic": "\nTedious(leonie)\nDeceptive(ender)\nforall x (Explicable(x) -> Reasoned(x))\nforall x (Tedious(x) and Reasoned(x) -> Deceptive(x))\nforall x (Forked(x) -> Deceptive(x))\nforall x (Deceptive(x) -> Haemal(x))\nforall x (Tedious(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Reasoned(x))\nforall x (Deceptive(x) -> Haemal(x))\nforall x (Tedious(x) -> Reasoned(x))\nforall x (Forked(x) and Deceptive(x) -> Tedious(x))\n\nExplicable(ender)\n\nExplicable(ender) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Tatiana is looted. Barth is screaky. If something is hardy then it is pondering. If something is looted and pondering then it is screaky. All diseased things are screaky. Nice things are discovered. Green, screaky things are pondering. All screaky things are discovered. All looted things are pondering. If something is diseased and screaky then it is looted. Tatiana is not hardy.", "logic": "\nLooted(tatiana)\nScreaky(barth)\nforall x (Hardy(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Looted(x) and Pondering(x) -> Screaky(x))\nforall x (Diseased(x) -> Screaky(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Looted(x) and Screaky(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Screaky(x) -> Discovered(x))\nforall x (Looted(x) -> Pondering(x))\nforall x (Diseased(x) and Screaky(x) -> Looted(x))\n\nnot Hardy(tatiana)\n\nnot Hardy(tatiana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "Lay is unmanned. Marianne is dastardly. If something is partible then it is longtime. If something is unmanned and longtime then it is dastardly. All framed things are dastardly. Nice things are silicious. Green, dastardly things are longtime. All dastardly things are silicious. All unmanned things are longtime. If something is framed and dastardly then it is unmanned. Lay is smart.", "logic": "\nUnmanned(lay)\nDastardly(marianne)\nforall x (Partible(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Unmanned(x) and Longtime(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Framed(x) -> Dastardly(x))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Unmanned(x) and Dastardly(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Dastardly(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Unmanned(x) -> Longtime(x))\nforall x (Framed(x) and Dastardly(x) -> Unmanned(x))\n\nSmart(lay)\n\nSmart(lay) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-806"} {"premises": "The sherwin is erring. The wilmer chasse the vince. The wilmer scrabble the sherwin. The wilmer scrabble the dorit. The vince postpone the wilmer. The vince is obsessive. The dorit is robotlike. If something postpone the vince and the vince postpone the sherwin then it does not like the vince. If something chasse the dorit then the dorit scrabble the sherwin. The vince postpone the wilmer.", "logic": "\nErring(sherwin)\nChasse(wilmer, vince)\nScrabble(wilmer, sherwin)\nScrabble(wilmer, dorit)\nPostpone(vince, wilmer)\nObsessive(vince)\nRobotlike(dorit)\nforall x (Postpone(x, vince) and Postpone(vince, sherwin) -> not Chasse(x, vince))\nforall x (Chasse(x, dorit) -> Scrabble(dorit, sherwin))\n\nPostpone(vince, wilmer)\n\ntherefore Postpone(vince, wilmer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4672"} {"premises": "The blinni is unaddicted. The candy diagnose the kennedy. The candy ostracize the blinni. The candy ostracize the murdoch. The kennedy show the candy. The kennedy is likely. The murdoch is scrupulous. If something show the kennedy and the kennedy show the blinni then it does not like the kennedy. If something diagnose the murdoch then the murdoch ostracize the blinni. The kennedy is not likely.", "logic": "\nUnaddicted(blinni)\nDiagnose(candy, kennedy)\nOstracize(candy, blinni)\nOstracize(candy, murdoch)\nShow(kennedy, candy)\nLikely(kennedy)\nScrupulous(murdoch)\nforall x (Show(x, kennedy) and Show(kennedy, blinni) -> not Diagnose(x, kennedy))\nforall x (Diagnose(x, murdoch) -> Ostracize(murdoch, blinni))\n\nnot Likely(kennedy)\n\ntherefore Likely(kennedy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4672"} {"premises": "The maryanna is disabled. The ivonne notify the nathalie. The ivonne debilitate the maryanna. The ivonne debilitate the janaya. The nathalie clapboard the ivonne. The nathalie is covetous. The janaya is nonliving. If something clapboard the nathalie and the nathalie clapboard the maryanna then it does not like the nathalie. If something notify the janaya then the janaya debilitate the maryanna. The janaya does not see the maryanna.", "logic": "\nDisabled(maryanna)\nNotify(ivonne, nathalie)\nDebilitate(ivonne, maryanna)\nDebilitate(ivonne, janaya)\nClapboard(nathalie, ivonne)\nCovetous(nathalie)\nNonliving(janaya)\nforall x (Clapboard(x, nathalie) and Clapboard(nathalie, maryanna) -> not Notify(x, nathalie))\nforall x (Notify(x, janaya) -> Debilitate(janaya, maryanna))\n\nnot Debilitate(janaya, maryanna)\n\nforall x (Notify(x, janaya) -> Debilitate(janaya, maryanna)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4672"} {"premises": "The leia is cuspidated. The karol refund the stephenie. The karol unlock the leia. The karol unlock the rasla. The stephenie call the karol. The stephenie is titled. The rasla is agamous. If something call the stephenie and the stephenie call the leia then it does not like the stephenie. If something refund the rasla then the rasla unlock the leia. The leia refund the leia.", "logic": "\nCuspidated(leia)\nRefund(karol, stephenie)\nUnlock(karol, leia)\nUnlock(karol, rasla)\nCall(stephenie, karol)\nTitled(stephenie)\nAgamous(rasla)\nforall x (Call(x, stephenie) and Call(stephenie, leia) -> not Refund(x, stephenie))\nforall x (Refund(x, rasla) -> Unlock(rasla, leia))\n\nRefund(leia, leia)\n\nRefund(leia, leia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-4672"} {"premises": "Milton is cheeky. Milton is unbanded. Milton is next. Madelena is unbending. Madelena is unbanded. Madelena is immanent. Hogan is sudanese. Hogan is next. Lex is pristine. Lex is sudanese. Lex is cheeky. Lex is unbending. Lex is unbanded. Lex is immanent. Lex is next. All next things are unbending. Round things are cheeky. Lex is unbending.", "logic": "\nCheeky(milton)\nUnbanded(milton)\nNext(milton)\nUnbending(madelena)\nUnbanded(madelena)\nImmanent(madelena)\nSudanese(hogan)\nNext(hogan)\nPristine(lex)\nSudanese(lex)\nCheeky(lex)\nUnbending(lex)\nUnbanded(lex)\nImmanent(lex)\nNext(lex)\nforall x (Next(x) -> Unbending(x))\nforall x (Immanent(x) -> Cheeky(x))\n\nUnbending(lex)\n\ntherefore Unbending(lex)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Bryana is familial. Bryana is soaked. Bryana is belgian. Tedman is cloudless. Tedman is soaked. Tedman is unliveable. Janeva is gusty. Janeva is belgian. Jennilee is rare. Jennilee is gusty. Jennilee is familial. Jennilee is cloudless. Jennilee is soaked. Jennilee is unliveable. Jennilee is belgian. All belgian things are cloudless. Round things are familial. Jennilee is not gusty.", "logic": "\nFamilial(bryana)\nSoaked(bryana)\nBelgian(bryana)\nCloudless(tedman)\nSoaked(tedman)\nUnliveable(tedman)\nGusty(janeva)\nBelgian(janeva)\nRare(jennilee)\nGusty(jennilee)\nFamilial(jennilee)\nCloudless(jennilee)\nSoaked(jennilee)\nUnliveable(jennilee)\nBelgian(jennilee)\nforall x (Belgian(x) -> Cloudless(x))\nforall x (Unliveable(x) -> Familial(x))\n\nnot Gusty(jennilee)\n\ntherefore Gusty(jennilee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Winthrop is inoperable. Winthrop is crannied. Winthrop is earthbound. Madel is missionary. Madel is crannied. Madel is unhardened. Hetty is boughed. Hetty is earthbound. Pincas is ambrosial. Pincas is boughed. Pincas is inoperable. Pincas is missionary. Pincas is crannied. Pincas is unhardened. Pincas is earthbound. All earthbound things are missionary. Round things are inoperable. Hetty is missionary.", "logic": "\nInoperable(winthrop)\nCrannied(winthrop)\nEarthbound(winthrop)\nMissionary(madel)\nCrannied(madel)\nUnhardened(madel)\nBoughed(hetty)\nEarthbound(hetty)\nAmbrosial(pincas)\nBoughed(pincas)\nInoperable(pincas)\nMissionary(pincas)\nCrannied(pincas)\nUnhardened(pincas)\nEarthbound(pincas)\nforall x (Earthbound(x) -> Missionary(x))\nforall x (Unhardened(x) -> Inoperable(x))\n\nMissionary(hetty)\n\nEarthbound(hetty) and forall x (Earthbound(x) -> Missionary(x)) -> therefore Missionary(hetty)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Miranda is memberless. Miranda is casteless. Miranda is unsullied. Lisha is awheel. Lisha is casteless. Lisha is sacrosanct. Wally is forceful. Wally is unsullied. Patrice is fluky. Patrice is forceful. Patrice is memberless. Patrice is awheel. Patrice is casteless. Patrice is sacrosanct. Patrice is unsullied. All unsullied things are awheel. Round things are memberless. Lisha is not memberless.", "logic": "\nMemberless(miranda)\nCasteless(miranda)\nUnsullied(miranda)\nAwheel(lisha)\nCasteless(lisha)\nSacrosanct(lisha)\nForceful(wally)\nUnsullied(wally)\nFluky(patrice)\nForceful(patrice)\nMemberless(patrice)\nAwheel(patrice)\nCasteless(patrice)\nSacrosanct(patrice)\nUnsullied(patrice)\nforall x (Unsullied(x) -> Awheel(x))\nforall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Memberless(x))\n\nnot Memberless(lisha)\n\nSacrosanct(lisha) and forall x (Sacrosanct(x) -> Memberless(x)) -> therefore Memberless(lisha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Angelina is moire. Angelina is unsymbolic. Angelina is mesmerised. Annadiane is socialized. Annadiane is unsymbolic. Annadiane is stewed. Erasmus is nauseated. Erasmus is mesmerised. Aleece is whacky. Aleece is nauseated. Aleece is moire. Aleece is socialized. Aleece is unsymbolic. Aleece is stewed. Aleece is mesmerised. All mesmerised things are socialized. Round things are moire. Erasmus is not moire.", "logic": "\nMoire(angelina)\nUnsymbolic(angelina)\nMesmerised(angelina)\nSocialized(annadiane)\nUnsymbolic(annadiane)\nStewed(annadiane)\nNauseated(erasmus)\nMesmerised(erasmus)\nWhacky(aleece)\nNauseated(aleece)\nMoire(aleece)\nSocialized(aleece)\nUnsymbolic(aleece)\nStewed(aleece)\nMesmerised(aleece)\nforall x (Mesmerised(x) -> Socialized(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) -> Moire(x))\n\nnot Moire(erasmus)\n\nforall x (Stewed(x) -> Moire(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Temp is iridaceous. Temp is imbecilic. Temp is hideous. Marylinda is edentate. Marylinda is imbecilic. Marylinda is emasculate. Aziz is epidermal. Aziz is hideous. Lyndell is feisty. Lyndell is epidermal. Lyndell is iridaceous. Lyndell is edentate. Lyndell is imbecilic. Lyndell is emasculate. Lyndell is hideous. All hideous things are edentate. Round things are iridaceous. Marylinda is feisty.", "logic": "\nIridaceous(temp)\nImbecilic(temp)\nHideous(temp)\nEdentate(marylinda)\nImbecilic(marylinda)\nEmasculate(marylinda)\nEpidermal(aziz)\nHideous(aziz)\nFeisty(lyndell)\nEpidermal(lyndell)\nIridaceous(lyndell)\nEdentate(lyndell)\nImbecilic(lyndell)\nEmasculate(lyndell)\nHideous(lyndell)\nforall x (Hideous(x) -> Edentate(x))\nforall x (Emasculate(x) -> Iridaceous(x))\n\nFeisty(marylinda)\n\nFeisty(marylinda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Konrad is pivotal. Konrad is statant. Konrad is dinky. Kassi is eleven. Kassi is statant. Kassi is orthodox. Roarke is homing. Roarke is dinky. Nat is momentous. Nat is homing. Nat is pivotal. Nat is eleven. Nat is statant. Nat is orthodox. Nat is dinky. All dinky things are eleven. Round things are pivotal. Roarke is not momentous.", "logic": "\nPivotal(konrad)\nStatant(konrad)\nDinky(konrad)\nEleven(kassi)\nStatant(kassi)\nOrthodox(kassi)\nHoming(roarke)\nDinky(roarke)\nMomentous(nat)\nHoming(nat)\nPivotal(nat)\nEleven(nat)\nStatant(nat)\nOrthodox(nat)\nDinky(nat)\nforall x (Dinky(x) -> Eleven(x))\nforall x (Orthodox(x) -> Pivotal(x))\n\nnot Momentous(roarke)\n\nnot Momentous(roarke) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Trevar is self. Trevar is anginous. Trevar is unwitting. Kincaid is plastered. Kincaid is anginous. Kincaid is defeated. Kerry is soft. Kerry is unwitting. Jemima is explicable. Jemima is soft. Jemima is self. Jemima is plastered. Jemima is anginous. Jemima is defeated. Jemima is unwitting. All unwitting things are plastered. Round things are self. Kincaid is soft.", "logic": "\nSelf(trevar)\nAnginous(trevar)\nUnwitting(trevar)\nPlastered(kincaid)\nAnginous(kincaid)\nDefeated(kincaid)\nSoft(kerry)\nUnwitting(kerry)\nExplicable(jemima)\nSoft(jemima)\nSelf(jemima)\nPlastered(jemima)\nAnginous(jemima)\nDefeated(jemima)\nUnwitting(jemima)\nforall x (Unwitting(x) -> Plastered(x))\nforall x (Defeated(x) -> Self(x))\n\nSoft(kincaid)\n\nSoft(kincaid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3220"} {"premises": "Maren is localized. Maren is squeaky. Jarvis is spangly. Jarvis is not patronized. Raymund is gracile. Gisella is spangly. Gisella is localized. If Jarvis is patronized and Jarvis is gracile then Jarvis is squeaky. If Raymund is carboxylic then Raymund is not gracile. All squeaky things are gracile. All carboxylic things are not squeaky. Cold things are spangly. If Maren is not patronized then Maren is gracile. If Gisella is patronized and Gisella is carboxylic then Gisella is localized. If something is squeaky and spangly then it is not carboxylic. Jarvis is spangly.", "logic": "\nLocalized(maren)\nSqueaky(maren)\nSpangly(jarvis)\nnot Patronized(jarvis)\nGracile(raymund)\nSpangly(gisella)\nLocalized(gisella)\nPatronized(jarvis) and Gracile(jarvis) -> Squeaky(jarvis)\nCarboxylic(raymund) -> not Gracile(raymund)\nforall x (Squeaky(x) -> Gracile(x))\nforall x (Carboxylic(x) -> not Squeaky(x))\nforall x (Gracile(x) -> Spangly(x))\nnot Patronized(maren) -> Gracile(maren)\nPatronized(gisella) and Carboxylic(gisella) -> Localized(gisella)\nforall x (Squeaky(x) and Spangly(x) -> not Carboxylic(x))\n\nSpangly(jarvis)\n\ntherefore Spangly(jarvis)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Avie is gradatory. Avie is bold. Donovan is bareheaded. Donovan is not tenebrious. Sloane is scalelike. Marji is bareheaded. Marji is gradatory. If Donovan is tenebrious and Donovan is scalelike then Donovan is bold. If Sloane is sensible then Sloane is not scalelike. All bold things are scalelike. All sensible things are not bold. Cold things are bareheaded. If Avie is not tenebrious then Avie is scalelike. If Marji is tenebrious and Marji is sensible then Marji is gradatory. If something is bold and bareheaded then it is not sensible. Marji is not bareheaded.", "logic": "\nGradatory(avie)\nBold(avie)\nBareheaded(donovan)\nnot Tenebrious(donovan)\nScalelike(sloane)\nBareheaded(marji)\nGradatory(marji)\nTenebrious(donovan) and Scalelike(donovan) -> Bold(donovan)\nSensible(sloane) -> not Scalelike(sloane)\nforall x (Bold(x) -> Scalelike(x))\nforall x (Sensible(x) -> not Bold(x))\nforall x (Scalelike(x) -> Bareheaded(x))\nnot Tenebrious(avie) -> Scalelike(avie)\nTenebrious(marji) and Sensible(marji) -> Gradatory(marji)\nforall x (Bold(x) and Bareheaded(x) -> not Sensible(x))\n\nnot Bareheaded(marji)\n\ntherefore Bareheaded(marji)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Delila is impressive. Delila is deflective. Dollie is carmine. Dollie is not papillate. Carlye is militant. Olwen is carmine. Olwen is impressive. If Dollie is papillate and Dollie is militant then Dollie is deflective. If Carlye is dietary then Carlye is not militant. All deflective things are militant. All dietary things are not deflective. Cold things are carmine. If Delila is not papillate then Delila is militant. If Olwen is papillate and Olwen is dietary then Olwen is impressive. If something is deflective and carmine then it is not dietary. Carlye is carmine.", "logic": "\nImpressive(delila)\nDeflective(delila)\nCarmine(dollie)\nnot Papillate(dollie)\nMilitant(carlye)\nCarmine(olwen)\nImpressive(olwen)\nPapillate(dollie) and Militant(dollie) -> Deflective(dollie)\nDietary(carlye) -> not Militant(carlye)\nforall x (Deflective(x) -> Militant(x))\nforall x (Dietary(x) -> not Deflective(x))\nforall x (Militant(x) -> Carmine(x))\nnot Papillate(delila) -> Militant(delila)\nPapillate(olwen) and Dietary(olwen) -> Impressive(olwen)\nforall x (Deflective(x) and Carmine(x) -> not Dietary(x))\n\nCarmine(carlye)\n\nMilitant(carlye) and forall x (Militant(x) -> Carmine(x)) -> therefore Carmine(carlye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Vaughn is positive. Vaughn is unversed. Adaline is scoured. Adaline is not convenient. Malynda is touristy. Flin is scoured. Flin is positive. If Adaline is convenient and Adaline is touristy then Adaline is unversed. If Malynda is cinerary then Malynda is not touristy. All unversed things are touristy. All cinerary things are not unversed. Cold things are scoured. If Vaughn is not convenient then Vaughn is touristy. If Flin is convenient and Flin is cinerary then Flin is positive. If something is unversed and scoured then it is not cinerary. Vaughn is not touristy.", "logic": "\nPositive(vaughn)\nUnversed(vaughn)\nScoured(adaline)\nnot Convenient(adaline)\nTouristy(malynda)\nScoured(flin)\nPositive(flin)\nConvenient(adaline) and Touristy(adaline) -> Unversed(adaline)\nCinerary(malynda) -> not Touristy(malynda)\nforall x (Unversed(x) -> Touristy(x))\nforall x (Cinerary(x) -> not Unversed(x))\nforall x (Touristy(x) -> Scoured(x))\nnot Convenient(vaughn) -> Touristy(vaughn)\nConvenient(flin) and Cinerary(flin) -> Positive(flin)\nforall x (Unversed(x) and Scoured(x) -> not Cinerary(x))\n\nnot Touristy(vaughn)\n\nUnversed(vaughn) and forall x (Unversed(x) -> Touristy(x)) -> therefore Touristy(vaughn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Leelah is breeding. Leelah is plausive. Britaney is trilobated. Britaney is not devalued. Joyann is prying. Monty is trilobated. Monty is breeding. If Britaney is devalued and Britaney is prying then Britaney is plausive. If Joyann is imputable then Joyann is not prying. All plausive things are prying. All imputable things are not plausive. Cold things are trilobated. If Leelah is not devalued then Leelah is prying. If Monty is devalued and Monty is imputable then Monty is breeding. If something is plausive and trilobated then it is not imputable. Leelah is trilobated.", "logic": "\nBreeding(leelah)\nPlausive(leelah)\nTrilobated(britaney)\nnot Devalued(britaney)\nPrying(joyann)\nTrilobated(monty)\nBreeding(monty)\nDevalued(britaney) and Prying(britaney) -> Plausive(britaney)\nImputable(joyann) -> not Prying(joyann)\nforall x (Plausive(x) -> Prying(x))\nforall x (Imputable(x) -> not Plausive(x))\nforall x (Prying(x) -> Trilobated(x))\nnot Devalued(leelah) -> Prying(leelah)\nDevalued(monty) and Imputable(monty) -> Breeding(monty)\nforall x (Plausive(x) and Trilobated(x) -> not Imputable(x))\n\nTrilobated(leelah)\n\nPlausive(leelah) and forall x (Plausive(x) -> Prying(x)) -> therefore Prying(leelah) Prying(leelah) and forall x (Prying(x) -> Trilobated(x)) -> therefore Trilobated(leelah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Stefano is blonde. Stefano is groundless. Leshia is binominal. Leshia is not telephonic. Lorena is woolen. Barnett is binominal. Barnett is blonde. If Leshia is telephonic and Leshia is woolen then Leshia is groundless. If Lorena is autistic then Lorena is not woolen. All groundless things are woolen. All autistic things are not groundless. Cold things are binominal. If Stefano is not telephonic then Stefano is woolen. If Barnett is telephonic and Barnett is autistic then Barnett is blonde. If something is groundless and binominal then it is not autistic. Stefano is not binominal.", "logic": "\nBlonde(stefano)\nGroundless(stefano)\nBinominal(leshia)\nnot Telephonic(leshia)\nWoolen(lorena)\nBinominal(barnett)\nBlonde(barnett)\nTelephonic(leshia) and Woolen(leshia) -> Groundless(leshia)\nAutistic(lorena) -> not Woolen(lorena)\nforall x (Groundless(x) -> Woolen(x))\nforall x (Autistic(x) -> not Groundless(x))\nforall x (Woolen(x) -> Binominal(x))\nnot Telephonic(stefano) -> Woolen(stefano)\nTelephonic(barnett) and Autistic(barnett) -> Blonde(barnett)\nforall x (Groundless(x) and Binominal(x) -> not Autistic(x))\n\nnot Binominal(stefano)\n\nGroundless(stefano) and forall x (Groundless(x) -> Woolen(x)) -> therefore Woolen(stefano) Woolen(stefano) and forall x (Woolen(x) -> Binominal(x)) -> therefore Binominal(stefano)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Bradford is rummy. Bradford is dulled. Cherey is definable. Cherey is not insidious. Annabal is unvaned. Karen is definable. Karen is rummy. If Cherey is insidious and Cherey is unvaned then Cherey is dulled. If Annabal is tawdry then Annabal is not unvaned. All dulled things are unvaned. All tawdry things are not dulled. Cold things are definable. If Bradford is not insidious then Bradford is unvaned. If Karen is insidious and Karen is tawdry then Karen is rummy. If something is dulled and definable then it is not tawdry. Bradford is not tawdry.", "logic": "\nRummy(bradford)\nDulled(bradford)\nDefinable(cherey)\nnot Insidious(cherey)\nUnvaned(annabal)\nDefinable(karen)\nRummy(karen)\nInsidious(cherey) and Unvaned(cherey) -> Dulled(cherey)\nTawdry(annabal) -> not Unvaned(annabal)\nforall x (Dulled(x) -> Unvaned(x))\nforall x (Tawdry(x) -> not Dulled(x))\nforall x (Unvaned(x) -> Definable(x))\nnot Insidious(bradford) -> Unvaned(bradford)\nInsidious(karen) and Tawdry(karen) -> Rummy(karen)\nforall x (Dulled(x) and Definable(x) -> not Tawdry(x))\n\nnot Tawdry(bradford)\n\nDulled(bradford) and forall x (Dulled(x) -> Unvaned(x)) -> therefore Unvaned(bradford) Unvaned(bradford) and forall x (Unvaned(x) -> Definable(x)) -> therefore Definable(bradford) Dulled(bradford) and Definable(bradford) and forall x (Dulled(x) and Definable(x) -> not Tawdry(x)) -> therefore not Tawdry(bradford)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Sharron is stellate. Sharron is bombproof. Olenka is likeable. Olenka is not intricate. Richmond is theoretic. Aubert is likeable. Aubert is stellate. If Olenka is intricate and Olenka is theoretic then Olenka is bombproof. If Richmond is pungent then Richmond is not theoretic. All bombproof things are theoretic. All pungent things are not bombproof. Cold things are likeable. If Sharron is not intricate then Sharron is theoretic. If Aubert is intricate and Aubert is pungent then Aubert is stellate. If something is bombproof and likeable then it is not pungent. Sharron is pungent.", "logic": "\nStellate(sharron)\nBombproof(sharron)\nLikeable(olenka)\nnot Intricate(olenka)\nTheoretic(richmond)\nLikeable(aubert)\nStellate(aubert)\nIntricate(olenka) and Theoretic(olenka) -> Bombproof(olenka)\nPungent(richmond) -> not Theoretic(richmond)\nforall x (Bombproof(x) -> Theoretic(x))\nforall x (Pungent(x) -> not Bombproof(x))\nforall x (Theoretic(x) -> Likeable(x))\nnot Intricate(sharron) -> Theoretic(sharron)\nIntricate(aubert) and Pungent(aubert) -> Stellate(aubert)\nforall x (Bombproof(x) and Likeable(x) -> not Pungent(x))\n\nPungent(sharron)\n\nBombproof(sharron) and forall x (Bombproof(x) -> Theoretic(x)) -> therefore Theoretic(sharron) Theoretic(sharron) and forall x (Theoretic(x) -> Likeable(x)) -> therefore Likeable(sharron) Bombproof(sharron) and Likeable(sharron) and forall x (Bombproof(x) and Likeable(x) -> not Pungent(x)) -> therefore not Pungent(sharron)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Kit is slicked. Kit is domed. Marchelle is orbital. Marchelle is not sensible. Fredrika is spiritous. Olive is orbital. Olive is slicked. If Marchelle is sensible and Marchelle is spiritous then Marchelle is domed. If Fredrika is bottomed then Fredrika is not spiritous. All domed things are spiritous. All bottomed things are not domed. Cold things are orbital. If Kit is not sensible then Kit is spiritous. If Olive is sensible and Olive is bottomed then Olive is slicked. If something is domed and orbital then it is not bottomed. Marchelle is not spiritous.", "logic": "\nSlicked(kit)\nDomed(kit)\nOrbital(marchelle)\nnot Sensible(marchelle)\nSpiritous(fredrika)\nOrbital(olive)\nSlicked(olive)\nSensible(marchelle) and Spiritous(marchelle) -> Domed(marchelle)\nBottomed(fredrika) -> not Spiritous(fredrika)\nforall x (Domed(x) -> Spiritous(x))\nforall x (Bottomed(x) -> not Domed(x))\nforall x (Spiritous(x) -> Orbital(x))\nnot Sensible(kit) -> Spiritous(kit)\nSensible(olive) and Bottomed(olive) -> Slicked(olive)\nforall x (Domed(x) and Orbital(x) -> not Bottomed(x))\n\nnot Spiritous(marchelle)\n\nforall x (Domed(x) -> Spiritous(x)) <- Sensible(marchelle) and Spiritous(marchelle) -> Domed(marchelle) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Garland is sardinian. Garland is rawboned. Otha is subduable. Otha is not zygodactyl. Allissa is unfrosted. Allie is subduable. Allie is sardinian. If Otha is zygodactyl and Otha is unfrosted then Otha is rawboned. If Allissa is oozing then Allissa is not unfrosted. All rawboned things are unfrosted. All oozing things are not rawboned. Cold things are subduable. If Garland is not zygodactyl then Garland is unfrosted. If Allie is zygodactyl and Allie is oozing then Allie is sardinian. If something is rawboned and subduable then it is not oozing. Allie is unfrosted.", "logic": "\nSardinian(garland)\nRawboned(garland)\nSubduable(otha)\nnot Zygodactyl(otha)\nUnfrosted(allissa)\nSubduable(allie)\nSardinian(allie)\nZygodactyl(otha) and Unfrosted(otha) -> Rawboned(otha)\nOozing(allissa) -> not Unfrosted(allissa)\nforall x (Rawboned(x) -> Unfrosted(x))\nforall x (Oozing(x) -> not Rawboned(x))\nforall x (Unfrosted(x) -> Subduable(x))\nnot Zygodactyl(garland) -> Unfrosted(garland)\nZygodactyl(allie) and Oozing(allie) -> Sardinian(allie)\nforall x (Rawboned(x) and Subduable(x) -> not Oozing(x))\n\nUnfrosted(allie)\n\nforall x (Rawboned(x) -> Unfrosted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Nichols is loving. Nichols is grungy. Brynne is speckled. Brynne is not combined. Bev is sagging. Sibeal is speckled. Sibeal is loving. If Brynne is combined and Brynne is sagging then Brynne is grungy. If Bev is ersatz then Bev is not sagging. All grungy things are sagging. All ersatz things are not grungy. Cold things are speckled. If Nichols is not combined then Nichols is sagging. If Sibeal is combined and Sibeal is ersatz then Sibeal is loving. If something is grungy and speckled then it is not ersatz. Brynne is not grungy.", "logic": "\nLoving(nichols)\nGrungy(nichols)\nSpeckled(brynne)\nnot Combined(brynne)\nSagging(bev)\nSpeckled(sibeal)\nLoving(sibeal)\nCombined(brynne) and Sagging(brynne) -> Grungy(brynne)\nErsatz(bev) -> not Sagging(bev)\nforall x (Grungy(x) -> Sagging(x))\nforall x (Ersatz(x) -> not Grungy(x))\nforall x (Sagging(x) -> Speckled(x))\nnot Combined(nichols) -> Sagging(nichols)\nCombined(sibeal) and Ersatz(sibeal) -> Loving(sibeal)\nforall x (Grungy(x) and Speckled(x) -> not Ersatz(x))\n\nnot Grungy(brynne)\n\nCombined(brynne) and Sagging(brynne) -> Grungy(brynne) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Prudence is down. Prudence is unsized. Frans is inverted. Frans is not abscessed. Cloris is fourteenth. Verney is inverted. Verney is down. If Frans is abscessed and Frans is fourteenth then Frans is unsized. If Cloris is quenchless then Cloris is not fourteenth. All unsized things are fourteenth. All quenchless things are not unsized. Cold things are inverted. If Prudence is not abscessed then Prudence is fourteenth. If Verney is abscessed and Verney is quenchless then Verney is down. If something is unsized and inverted then it is not quenchless. Frans is quenchless.", "logic": "\nDown(prudence)\nUnsized(prudence)\nInverted(frans)\nnot Abscessed(frans)\nFourteenth(cloris)\nInverted(verney)\nDown(verney)\nAbscessed(frans) and Fourteenth(frans) -> Unsized(frans)\nQuenchless(cloris) -> not Fourteenth(cloris)\nforall x (Unsized(x) -> Fourteenth(x))\nforall x (Quenchless(x) -> not Unsized(x))\nforall x (Fourteenth(x) -> Inverted(x))\nnot Abscessed(prudence) -> Fourteenth(prudence)\nAbscessed(verney) and Quenchless(verney) -> Down(verney)\nforall x (Unsized(x) and Inverted(x) -> not Quenchless(x))\n\nQuenchless(frans)\n\nQuenchless(frans) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Debra is recessed. Debra is prenominal. Bernadine is inquiring. Bernadine is not objective. Debby is subgross. Tersina is inquiring. Tersina is recessed. If Bernadine is objective and Bernadine is subgross then Bernadine is prenominal. If Debby is foamy then Debby is not subgross. All prenominal things are subgross. All foamy things are not prenominal. Cold things are inquiring. If Debra is not objective then Debra is subgross. If Tersina is objective and Tersina is foamy then Tersina is recessed. If something is prenominal and inquiring then it is not foamy. Debra is not red.", "logic": "\nRecessed(debra)\nPrenominal(debra)\nInquiring(bernadine)\nnot Objective(bernadine)\nSubgross(debby)\nInquiring(tersina)\nRecessed(tersina)\nObjective(bernadine) and Subgross(bernadine) -> Prenominal(bernadine)\nFoamy(debby) -> not Subgross(debby)\nforall x (Prenominal(x) -> Subgross(x))\nforall x (Foamy(x) -> not Prenominal(x))\nforall x (Subgross(x) -> Inquiring(x))\nnot Objective(debra) -> Subgross(debra)\nObjective(tersina) and Foamy(tersina) -> Recessed(tersina)\nforall x (Prenominal(x) and Inquiring(x) -> not Foamy(x))\n\nnot Red(debra)\n\nnot Red(debra) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Zeb is hammered. Zeb is pursuing. Stormi is courageous. Stormi is not sweptwing. Maggee is retiring. Jewell is courageous. Jewell is hammered. If Stormi is sweptwing and Stormi is retiring then Stormi is pursuing. If Maggee is straight then Maggee is not retiring. All pursuing things are retiring. All straight things are not pursuing. Cold things are courageous. If Zeb is not sweptwing then Zeb is retiring. If Jewell is sweptwing and Jewell is straight then Jewell is hammered. If something is pursuing and courageous then it is not straight. Maggee is red.", "logic": "\nHammered(zeb)\nPursuing(zeb)\nCourageous(stormi)\nnot Sweptwing(stormi)\nRetiring(maggee)\nCourageous(jewell)\nHammered(jewell)\nSweptwing(stormi) and Retiring(stormi) -> Pursuing(stormi)\nStraight(maggee) -> not Retiring(maggee)\nforall x (Pursuing(x) -> Retiring(x))\nforall x (Straight(x) -> not Pursuing(x))\nforall x (Retiring(x) -> Courageous(x))\nnot Sweptwing(zeb) -> Retiring(zeb)\nSweptwing(jewell) and Straight(jewell) -> Hammered(jewell)\nforall x (Pursuing(x) and Courageous(x) -> not Straight(x))\n\nRed(maggee)\n\nRed(maggee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Joell is citywide. Joell is southeast. Gustave is evasive. Gustave is not shaded. Carmen is droopy. Emmie is evasive. Emmie is citywide. If Gustave is shaded and Gustave is droopy then Gustave is southeast. If Carmen is benthonic then Carmen is not droopy. All southeast things are droopy. All benthonic things are not southeast. Cold things are evasive. If Joell is not shaded then Joell is droopy. If Emmie is shaded and Emmie is benthonic then Emmie is citywide. If something is southeast and evasive then it is not benthonic. Carmen is not benthonic.", "logic": "\nCitywide(joell)\nSoutheast(joell)\nEvasive(gustave)\nnot Shaded(gustave)\nDroopy(carmen)\nEvasive(emmie)\nCitywide(emmie)\nShaded(gustave) and Droopy(gustave) -> Southeast(gustave)\nBenthonic(carmen) -> not Droopy(carmen)\nforall x (Southeast(x) -> Droopy(x))\nforall x (Benthonic(x) -> not Southeast(x))\nforall x (Droopy(x) -> Evasive(x))\nnot Shaded(joell) -> Droopy(joell)\nShaded(emmie) and Benthonic(emmie) -> Citywide(emmie)\nforall x (Southeast(x) and Evasive(x) -> not Benthonic(x))\n\nnot Benthonic(carmen)\n\nnot Benthonic(carmen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "Hercule is toned. Hercule is clashing. Cob is shelfy. Cob is not modeled. Adolph is vacillant. Ophelia is shelfy. Ophelia is toned. If Cob is modeled and Cob is vacillant then Cob is clashing. If Adolph is subliminal then Adolph is not vacillant. All clashing things are vacillant. All subliminal things are not clashing. Cold things are shelfy. If Hercule is not modeled then Hercule is vacillant. If Ophelia is modeled and Ophelia is subliminal then Ophelia is toned. If something is clashing and shelfy then it is not subliminal. Adolph is modeled.", "logic": "\nToned(hercule)\nClashing(hercule)\nShelfy(cob)\nnot Modeled(cob)\nVacillant(adolph)\nShelfy(ophelia)\nToned(ophelia)\nModeled(cob) and Vacillant(cob) -> Clashing(cob)\nSubliminal(adolph) -> not Vacillant(adolph)\nforall x (Clashing(x) -> Vacillant(x))\nforall x (Subliminal(x) -> not Clashing(x))\nforall x (Vacillant(x) -> Shelfy(x))\nnot Modeled(hercule) -> Vacillant(hercule)\nModeled(ophelia) and Subliminal(ophelia) -> Toned(ophelia)\nforall x (Clashing(x) and Shelfy(x) -> not Subliminal(x))\n\nModeled(adolph)\n\nModeled(adolph) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-401"} {"premises": "The samuella remainder the arron. The arron grieve the sergio. The sergio bolshevise the samuella. If something bolshevise the samuella then it grieve the arron. If the sergio grieve the samuella and the sergio is astonied then the sergio grieve the arron. If something grieve the sergio and it remainder the sergio then it bolshevise the samuella. If something remainder the arron and the arron is million then it is astonied. If something remainder the arron then the arron remainder the sergio. If something remainder the samuella then the samuella is million. The sergio bolshevise the samuella.", "logic": "\nRemainder(samuella, arron)\nGrieve(arron, sergio)\nBolshevise(sergio, samuella)\nforall x (Bolshevise(x, samuella) -> Grieve(x, arron))\nGrieve(sergio, samuella) and Astonied(sergio) -> Grieve(sergio, arron)\nforall x (Grieve(x, sergio) and Remainder(x, sergio) -> Bolshevise(x, samuella))\nforall x (Remainder(x, arron) and Million(arron) -> Astonied(x))\nforall x (Remainder(x, arron) -> Remainder(arron, sergio))\nforall x (Remainder(x, samuella) -> Million(samuella))\n\nBolshevise(sergio, samuella)\n\ntherefore Bolshevise(sergio, samuella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The stillmann outgeneral the ron. The ron rout the cristie. The cristie overcrowd the stillmann. If something overcrowd the stillmann then it rout the ron. If the cristie rout the stillmann and the cristie is loth then the cristie rout the ron. If something rout the cristie and it outgeneral the cristie then it overcrowd the stillmann. If something outgeneral the ron and the ron is recorded then it is loth. If something outgeneral the ron then the ron outgeneral the cristie. If something outgeneral the stillmann then the stillmann is recorded. The cristie does not visit the stillmann.", "logic": "\nOutgeneral(stillmann, ron)\nRout(ron, cristie)\nOvercrowd(cristie, stillmann)\nforall x (Overcrowd(x, stillmann) -> Rout(x, ron))\nRout(cristie, stillmann) and Loth(cristie) -> Rout(cristie, ron)\nforall x (Rout(x, cristie) and Outgeneral(x, cristie) -> Overcrowd(x, stillmann))\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, ron) and Recorded(ron) -> Loth(x))\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, ron) -> Outgeneral(ron, cristie))\nforall x (Outgeneral(x, stillmann) -> Recorded(stillmann))\n\nnot Overcrowd(cristie, stillmann)\n\ntherefore Overcrowd(cristie, stillmann)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The guglielma bacterise the carie. The carie regroup the albrecht. The albrecht embattle the guglielma. If something embattle the guglielma then it regroup the carie. If the albrecht regroup the guglielma and the albrecht is infatuated then the albrecht regroup the carie. If something regroup the albrecht and it bacterise the albrecht then it embattle the guglielma. If something bacterise the carie and the carie is unmown then it is infatuated. If something bacterise the carie then the carie bacterise the albrecht. If something bacterise the guglielma then the guglielma is unmown. The carie bacterise the albrecht.", "logic": "\nBacterise(guglielma, carie)\nRegroup(carie, albrecht)\nEmbattle(albrecht, guglielma)\nforall x (Embattle(x, guglielma) -> Regroup(x, carie))\nRegroup(albrecht, guglielma) and Infatuated(albrecht) -> Regroup(albrecht, carie)\nforall x (Regroup(x, albrecht) and Bacterise(x, albrecht) -> Embattle(x, guglielma))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, carie) and Unmown(carie) -> Infatuated(x))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, carie) -> Bacterise(carie, albrecht))\nforall x (Bacterise(x, guglielma) -> Unmown(guglielma))\n\nBacterise(carie, albrecht)\n\nBacterise(guglielma, carie) and forall x (Bacterise(x, carie) -> Bacterise(carie, albrecht)) -> therefore Bacterise(carie, albrecht)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The yves manacle the shelby. The shelby position the fenelia. The fenelia coagulate the yves. If something coagulate the yves then it position the shelby. If the fenelia position the yves and the fenelia is appellant then the fenelia position the shelby. If something position the fenelia and it manacle the fenelia then it coagulate the yves. If something manacle the shelby and the shelby is immortal then it is appellant. If something manacle the shelby then the shelby manacle the fenelia. If something manacle the yves then the yves is immortal. The fenelia does not see the shelby.", "logic": "\nManacle(yves, shelby)\nPosition(shelby, fenelia)\nCoagulate(fenelia, yves)\nforall x (Coagulate(x, yves) -> Position(x, shelby))\nPosition(fenelia, yves) and Appellant(fenelia) -> Position(fenelia, shelby)\nforall x (Position(x, fenelia) and Manacle(x, fenelia) -> Coagulate(x, yves))\nforall x (Manacle(x, shelby) and Immortal(shelby) -> Appellant(x))\nforall x (Manacle(x, shelby) -> Manacle(shelby, fenelia))\nforall x (Manacle(x, yves) -> Immortal(yves))\n\nnot Position(fenelia, shelby)\n\nCoagulate(fenelia, yves) and forall x (Coagulate(x, yves) -> Position(x, shelby)) -> therefore Position(fenelia, shelby)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The fina stretch the randene. The randene swamp the wilson. The wilson whiff the fina. If something whiff the fina then it swamp the randene. If the wilson swamp the fina and the wilson is bragging then the wilson swamp the randene. If something swamp the wilson and it stretch the wilson then it whiff the fina. If something stretch the randene and the randene is marooned then it is bragging. If something stretch the randene then the randene stretch the wilson. If something stretch the fina then the fina is marooned. The randene whiff the fina.", "logic": "\nStretch(fina, randene)\nSwamp(randene, wilson)\nWhiff(wilson, fina)\nforall x (Whiff(x, fina) -> Swamp(x, randene))\nSwamp(wilson, fina) and Bragging(wilson) -> Swamp(wilson, randene)\nforall x (Swamp(x, wilson) and Stretch(x, wilson) -> Whiff(x, fina))\nforall x (Stretch(x, randene) and Marooned(randene) -> Bragging(x))\nforall x (Stretch(x, randene) -> Stretch(randene, wilson))\nforall x (Stretch(x, fina) -> Marooned(fina))\n\nWhiff(randene, fina)\n\nStretch(fina, randene) and forall x (Stretch(x, randene) -> Stretch(randene, wilson)) -> therefore Stretch(randene, wilson) Swamp(randene, wilson) and Stretch(randene, wilson) and forall x (Swamp(x, wilson) and Stretch(x, wilson) -> Whiff(x, fina)) -> therefore Whiff(randene, fina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The kyla intervene the brandon. The brandon riposte the andriana. The andriana overstate the kyla. If something overstate the kyla then it riposte the brandon. If the andriana riposte the kyla and the andriana is hadean then the andriana riposte the brandon. If something riposte the andriana and it intervene the andriana then it overstate the kyla. If something intervene the brandon and the brandon is unbolted then it is hadean. If something intervene the brandon then the brandon intervene the andriana. If something intervene the kyla then the kyla is unbolted. The brandon does not visit the kyla.", "logic": "\nIntervene(kyla, brandon)\nRiposte(brandon, andriana)\nOverstate(andriana, kyla)\nforall x (Overstate(x, kyla) -> Riposte(x, brandon))\nRiposte(andriana, kyla) and Hadean(andriana) -> Riposte(andriana, brandon)\nforall x (Riposte(x, andriana) and Intervene(x, andriana) -> Overstate(x, kyla))\nforall x (Intervene(x, brandon) and Unbolted(brandon) -> Hadean(x))\nforall x (Intervene(x, brandon) -> Intervene(brandon, andriana))\nforall x (Intervene(x, kyla) -> Unbolted(kyla))\n\nnot Overstate(brandon, kyla)\n\nIntervene(kyla, brandon) and forall x (Intervene(x, brandon) -> Intervene(brandon, andriana)) -> therefore Intervene(brandon, andriana) Riposte(brandon, andriana) and Intervene(brandon, andriana) and forall x (Riposte(x, andriana) and Intervene(x, andriana) -> Overstate(x, kyla)) -> therefore Overstate(brandon, kyla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The regan mainline the anissa. The anissa weather the ariela. The ariela lasso the regan. If something lasso the regan then it weather the anissa. If the ariela weather the regan and the ariela is violent then the ariela weather the anissa. If something weather the ariela and it mainline the ariela then it lasso the regan. If something mainline the anissa and the anissa is rasping then it is violent. If something mainline the anissa then the anissa mainline the ariela. If something mainline the regan then the regan is rasping. The anissa weather the anissa.", "logic": "\nMainline(regan, anissa)\nWeather(anissa, ariela)\nLasso(ariela, regan)\nforall x (Lasso(x, regan) -> Weather(x, anissa))\nWeather(ariela, regan) and Violent(ariela) -> Weather(ariela, anissa)\nforall x (Weather(x, ariela) and Mainline(x, ariela) -> Lasso(x, regan))\nforall x (Mainline(x, anissa) and Rasping(anissa) -> Violent(x))\nforall x (Mainline(x, anissa) -> Mainline(anissa, ariela))\nforall x (Mainline(x, regan) -> Rasping(regan))\n\nWeather(anissa, anissa)\n\nMainline(regan, anissa) and forall x (Mainline(x, anissa) -> Mainline(anissa, ariela)) -> therefore Mainline(anissa, ariela) Weather(anissa, ariela) and Mainline(anissa, ariela) and forall x (Weather(x, ariela) and Mainline(x, ariela) -> Lasso(x, regan)) -> therefore Lasso(anissa, regan) Lasso(anissa, regan) and forall x (Lasso(x, regan) -> Weather(x, anissa)) -> therefore Weather(anissa, anissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The ame quickstep the lemar. The lemar fool the constanta. The constanta crane the ame. If something crane the ame then it fool the lemar. If the constanta fool the ame and the constanta is cochlear then the constanta fool the lemar. If something fool the constanta and it quickstep the constanta then it crane the ame. If something quickstep the lemar and the lemar is dear then it is cochlear. If something quickstep the lemar then the lemar quickstep the constanta. If something quickstep the ame then the ame is dear. The lemar does not see the lemar.", "logic": "\nQuickstep(ame, lemar)\nFool(lemar, constanta)\nCrane(constanta, ame)\nforall x (Crane(x, ame) -> Fool(x, lemar))\nFool(constanta, ame) and Cochlear(constanta) -> Fool(constanta, lemar)\nforall x (Fool(x, constanta) and Quickstep(x, constanta) -> Crane(x, ame))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, lemar) and Dear(lemar) -> Cochlear(x))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, lemar) -> Quickstep(lemar, constanta))\nforall x (Quickstep(x, ame) -> Dear(ame))\n\nnot Fool(lemar, lemar)\n\nQuickstep(ame, lemar) and forall x (Quickstep(x, lemar) -> Quickstep(lemar, constanta)) -> therefore Quickstep(lemar, constanta) Fool(lemar, constanta) and Quickstep(lemar, constanta) and forall x (Fool(x, constanta) and Quickstep(x, constanta) -> Crane(x, ame)) -> therefore Crane(lemar, ame) Crane(lemar, ame) and forall x (Crane(x, ame) -> Fool(x, lemar)) -> therefore Fool(lemar, lemar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The rubia read the eliza. The eliza dwarf the fenelia. The fenelia aggress the rubia. If something aggress the rubia then it dwarf the eliza. If the fenelia dwarf the rubia and the fenelia is tasselled then the fenelia dwarf the eliza. If something dwarf the fenelia and it read the fenelia then it aggress the rubia. If something read the eliza and the eliza is faddish then it is tasselled. If something read the eliza then the eliza read the fenelia. If something read the rubia then the rubia is faddish. The fenelia is not tasselled.", "logic": "\nRead(rubia, eliza)\nDwarf(eliza, fenelia)\nAggress(fenelia, rubia)\nforall x (Aggress(x, rubia) -> Dwarf(x, eliza))\nDwarf(fenelia, rubia) and Tasselled(fenelia) -> Dwarf(fenelia, eliza)\nforall x (Dwarf(x, fenelia) and Read(x, fenelia) -> Aggress(x, rubia))\nforall x (Read(x, eliza) and Faddish(eliza) -> Tasselled(x))\nforall x (Read(x, eliza) -> Read(eliza, fenelia))\nforall x (Read(x, rubia) -> Faddish(rubia))\n\nnot Tasselled(fenelia)\n\nforall x (Read(x, eliza) and Faddish(eliza) -> Tasselled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The mabel invade the howie. The howie wilt the cherie. The cherie moil the mabel. If something moil the mabel then it wilt the howie. If the cherie wilt the mabel and the cherie is encased then the cherie wilt the howie. If something wilt the cherie and it invade the cherie then it moil the mabel. If something invade the howie and the howie is crustose then it is encased. If something invade the howie then the howie invade the cherie. If something invade the mabel then the mabel is crustose. The mabel wilt the howie.", "logic": "\nInvade(mabel, howie)\nWilt(howie, cherie)\nMoil(cherie, mabel)\nforall x (Moil(x, mabel) -> Wilt(x, howie))\nWilt(cherie, mabel) and Encased(cherie) -> Wilt(cherie, howie)\nforall x (Wilt(x, cherie) and Invade(x, cherie) -> Moil(x, mabel))\nforall x (Invade(x, howie) and Crustose(howie) -> Encased(x))\nforall x (Invade(x, howie) -> Invade(howie, cherie))\nforall x (Invade(x, mabel) -> Crustose(mabel))\n\nWilt(mabel, howie)\n\nforall x (Moil(x, mabel) -> Wilt(x, howie)) <- forall x (Wilt(x, cherie) and Invade(x, cherie) -> Moil(x, mabel)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The thia whomp the hettie. The hettie keel the maxine. The maxine wring the thia. If something wring the thia then it keel the hettie. If the maxine keel the thia and the maxine is crappy then the maxine keel the hettie. If something keel the maxine and it whomp the maxine then it wring the thia. If something whomp the hettie and the hettie is elegiac then it is crappy. If something whomp the hettie then the hettie whomp the maxine. If something whomp the thia then the thia is elegiac. The thia is not crappy.", "logic": "\nWhomp(thia, hettie)\nKeel(hettie, maxine)\nWring(maxine, thia)\nforall x (Wring(x, thia) -> Keel(x, hettie))\nKeel(maxine, thia) and Crappy(maxine) -> Keel(maxine, hettie)\nforall x (Keel(x, maxine) and Whomp(x, maxine) -> Wring(x, thia))\nforall x (Whomp(x, hettie) and Elegiac(hettie) -> Crappy(x))\nforall x (Whomp(x, hettie) -> Whomp(hettie, maxine))\nforall x (Whomp(x, thia) -> Elegiac(thia))\n\nnot Crappy(thia)\n\nforall x (Whomp(x, hettie) and Elegiac(hettie) -> Crappy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The lucita natter the yonina. The yonina exhort the sybille. The sybille speck the lucita. If something speck the lucita then it exhort the yonina. If the sybille exhort the lucita and the sybille is unmarried then the sybille exhort the yonina. If something exhort the sybille and it natter the sybille then it speck the lucita. If something natter the yonina and the yonina is meridional then it is unmarried. If something natter the yonina then the yonina natter the sybille. If something natter the lucita then the lucita is meridional. The lucita speck the lucita.", "logic": "\nNatter(lucita, yonina)\nExhort(yonina, sybille)\nSpeck(sybille, lucita)\nforall x (Speck(x, lucita) -> Exhort(x, yonina))\nExhort(sybille, lucita) and Unmarried(sybille) -> Exhort(sybille, yonina)\nforall x (Exhort(x, sybille) and Natter(x, sybille) -> Speck(x, lucita))\nforall x (Natter(x, yonina) and Meridional(yonina) -> Unmarried(x))\nforall x (Natter(x, yonina) -> Natter(yonina, sybille))\nforall x (Natter(x, lucita) -> Meridional(lucita))\n\nSpeck(lucita, lucita)\n\nforall x (Exhort(x, sybille) and Natter(x, sybille) -> Speck(x, lucita)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The elga amalgamate the collin. The collin entwine the aubine. The aubine sneer the elga. If something sneer the elga then it entwine the collin. If the aubine entwine the elga and the aubine is raising then the aubine entwine the collin. If something entwine the aubine and it amalgamate the aubine then it sneer the elga. If something amalgamate the collin and the collin is african then it is raising. If something amalgamate the collin then the collin amalgamate the aubine. If something amalgamate the elga then the elga is african. The aubine does not see the elga.", "logic": "\nAmalgamate(elga, collin)\nEntwine(collin, aubine)\nSneer(aubine, elga)\nforall x (Sneer(x, elga) -> Entwine(x, collin))\nEntwine(aubine, elga) and Raising(aubine) -> Entwine(aubine, collin)\nforall x (Entwine(x, aubine) and Amalgamate(x, aubine) -> Sneer(x, elga))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x, collin) and African(collin) -> Raising(x))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x, collin) -> Amalgamate(collin, aubine))\nforall x (Amalgamate(x, elga) -> African(elga))\n\nnot Entwine(aubine, elga)\n\nnot Entwine(aubine, elga) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The bartolemo extol the matias. The matias stack the winston. The winston cloture the bartolemo. If something cloture the bartolemo then it stack the matias. If the winston stack the bartolemo and the winston is mendacious then the winston stack the matias. If something stack the winston and it extol the winston then it cloture the bartolemo. If something extol the matias and the matias is awny then it is mendacious. If something extol the matias then the matias extol the winston. If something extol the bartolemo then the bartolemo is awny. The bartolemo stack the bartolemo.", "logic": "\nExtol(bartolemo, matias)\nStack(matias, winston)\nCloture(winston, bartolemo)\nforall x (Cloture(x, bartolemo) -> Stack(x, matias))\nStack(winston, bartolemo) and Mendacious(winston) -> Stack(winston, matias)\nforall x (Stack(x, winston) and Extol(x, winston) -> Cloture(x, bartolemo))\nforall x (Extol(x, matias) and Awny(matias) -> Mendacious(x))\nforall x (Extol(x, matias) -> Extol(matias, winston))\nforall x (Extol(x, bartolemo) -> Awny(bartolemo))\n\nStack(bartolemo, bartolemo)\n\nStack(bartolemo, bartolemo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The larine convolute the rheba. The rheba believe the florance. The florance guffaw the larine. If something guffaw the larine then it believe the rheba. If the florance believe the larine and the florance is isentropic then the florance believe the rheba. If something believe the florance and it convolute the florance then it guffaw the larine. If something convolute the rheba and the rheba is amidship then it is isentropic. If something convolute the rheba then the rheba convolute the florance. If something convolute the larine then the larine is amidship. The larine does not visit the rheba.", "logic": "\nConvolute(larine, rheba)\nBelieve(rheba, florance)\nGuffaw(florance, larine)\nforall x (Guffaw(x, larine) -> Believe(x, rheba))\nBelieve(florance, larine) and Isentropic(florance) -> Believe(florance, rheba)\nforall x (Believe(x, florance) and Convolute(x, florance) -> Guffaw(x, larine))\nforall x (Convolute(x, rheba) and Amidship(rheba) -> Isentropic(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x, rheba) -> Convolute(rheba, florance))\nforall x (Convolute(x, larine) -> Amidship(larine))\n\nnot Guffaw(larine, rheba)\n\nnot Guffaw(larine, rheba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "The calhoun tame the selma. The selma yack the terra. The terra jingle the calhoun. If something jingle the calhoun then it yack the selma. If the terra yack the calhoun and the terra is edwardian then the terra yack the selma. If something yack the terra and it tame the terra then it jingle the calhoun. If something tame the selma and the selma is sullen then it is edwardian. If something tame the selma then the selma tame the terra. If something tame the calhoun then the calhoun is sullen. The calhoun is kind.", "logic": "\nTame(calhoun, selma)\nYack(selma, terra)\nJingle(terra, calhoun)\nforall x (Jingle(x, calhoun) -> Yack(x, selma))\nYack(terra, calhoun) and Edwardian(terra) -> Yack(terra, selma)\nforall x (Yack(x, terra) and Tame(x, terra) -> Jingle(x, calhoun))\nforall x (Tame(x, selma) and Sullen(selma) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Tame(x, selma) -> Tame(selma, terra))\nforall x (Tame(x, calhoun) -> Sullen(calhoun))\n\nKind(calhoun)\n\nKind(calhoun) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-398"} {"premises": "Dewitt is penitent. Shari is rare. Shari is assignable. Shari is queasy. Sidnee is nontoxic. Sidnee is not assignable. Sidnee is not penitent. Sidnee is nestled. Sidnee is queasy. Sidnee is flyspeck. If someone is assignable and queasy then they are not nontoxic. All queasy, assignable people are rare. Shari is queasy.", "logic": "\nPenitent(dewitt)\nRare(shari)\nAssignable(shari)\nQueasy(shari)\nNontoxic(sidnee)\nnot Assignable(sidnee)\nnot Penitent(sidnee)\nNestled(sidnee)\nQueasy(sidnee)\nFlyspeck(sidnee)\nforall x (Assignable(x) and Queasy(x) -> not Nontoxic(x))\nforall x (Queasy(x) and Assignable(x) -> Rare(x))\n\nQueasy(shari)\n\ntherefore Queasy(shari)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Raymundo is snooty. Correna is superfine. Correna is colloidal. Correna is hydroponic. Clo is rarefied. Clo is not colloidal. Clo is not snooty. Clo is rotted. Clo is hydroponic. Clo is fewer. If someone is colloidal and hydroponic then they are not rarefied. All hydroponic, colloidal people are superfine. Clo is not rotted.", "logic": "\nSnooty(raymundo)\nSuperfine(correna)\nColloidal(correna)\nHydroponic(correna)\nRarefied(clo)\nnot Colloidal(clo)\nnot Snooty(clo)\nRotted(clo)\nHydroponic(clo)\nFewer(clo)\nforall x (Colloidal(x) and Hydroponic(x) -> not Rarefied(x))\nforall x (Hydroponic(x) and Colloidal(x) -> Superfine(x))\n\nnot Rotted(clo)\n\ntherefore Rotted(clo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Lianna is miffed. Lesly is lessened. Lesly is maverick. Lesly is gumptious. Katti is minded. Katti is not maverick. Katti is not miffed. Katti is linnaean. Katti is gumptious. Katti is previous. If someone is maverick and gumptious then they are not minded. All gumptious, maverick people are lessened. Lesly is not minded.", "logic": "\nMiffed(lianna)\nLessened(lesly)\nMaverick(lesly)\nGumptious(lesly)\nMinded(katti)\nnot Maverick(katti)\nnot Miffed(katti)\nLinnaean(katti)\nGumptious(katti)\nPrevious(katti)\nforall x (Maverick(x) and Gumptious(x) -> not Minded(x))\nforall x (Gumptious(x) and Maverick(x) -> Lessened(x))\n\nnot Minded(lesly)\n\nMaverick(lesly) and Gumptious(lesly) and forall x (Maverick(x) and Gumptious(x) -> not Minded(x)) -> therefore not Minded(lesly)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Amelie is crabby. Kassi is downstairs. Kassi is nutty. Kassi is shorn. Clovis is binominal. Clovis is not nutty. Clovis is not crabby. Clovis is erogenous. Clovis is shorn. Clovis is genitive. If someone is nutty and shorn then they are not binominal. All shorn, nutty people are downstairs. Kassi is binominal.", "logic": "\nCrabby(amelie)\nDownstairs(kassi)\nNutty(kassi)\nShorn(kassi)\nBinominal(clovis)\nnot Nutty(clovis)\nnot Crabby(clovis)\nErogenous(clovis)\nShorn(clovis)\nGenitive(clovis)\nforall x (Nutty(x) and Shorn(x) -> not Binominal(x))\nforall x (Shorn(x) and Nutty(x) -> Downstairs(x))\n\nBinominal(kassi)\n\nNutty(kassi) and Shorn(kassi) and forall x (Nutty(x) and Shorn(x) -> not Binominal(x)) -> therefore not Binominal(kassi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Stephie is treacly. Suzie is zambian. Suzie is cancroid. Suzie is mated. Rocky is aluminous. Rocky is not cancroid. Rocky is not treacly. Rocky is devious. Rocky is mated. Rocky is sinful. If someone is cancroid and mated then they are not aluminous. All mated, cancroid people are zambian. Rocky is not zambian.", "logic": "\nTreacly(stephie)\nZambian(suzie)\nCancroid(suzie)\nMated(suzie)\nAluminous(rocky)\nnot Cancroid(rocky)\nnot Treacly(rocky)\nDevious(rocky)\nMated(rocky)\nSinful(rocky)\nforall x (Cancroid(x) and Mated(x) -> not Aluminous(x))\nforall x (Mated(x) and Cancroid(x) -> Zambian(x))\n\nnot Zambian(rocky)\n\nforall x (Mated(x) and Cancroid(x) -> Zambian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Simonette is analyzable. Keriann is ametabolic. Keriann is bone. Keriann is slushy. Schroeder is warming. Schroeder is not bone. Schroeder is not analyzable. Schroeder is statuesque. Schroeder is slushy. Schroeder is icebound. If someone is bone and slushy then they are not warming. All slushy, bone people are ametabolic. Simonette is ametabolic.", "logic": "\nAnalyzable(simonette)\nAmetabolic(keriann)\nBone(keriann)\nSlushy(keriann)\nWarming(schroeder)\nnot Bone(schroeder)\nnot Analyzable(schroeder)\nStatuesque(schroeder)\nSlushy(schroeder)\nIcebound(schroeder)\nforall x (Bone(x) and Slushy(x) -> not Warming(x))\nforall x (Slushy(x) and Bone(x) -> Ametabolic(x))\n\nAmetabolic(simonette)\n\nforall x (Slushy(x) and Bone(x) -> Ametabolic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Lanette is braggy. Pegeen is merited. Pegeen is separable. Pegeen is pixilated. Karon is apocarpous. Karon is not separable. Karon is not braggy. Karon is abdicable. Karon is pixilated. Karon is vulturine. If someone is separable and pixilated then they are not apocarpous. All pixilated, separable people are merited. Pegeen is not abdicable.", "logic": "\nBraggy(lanette)\nMerited(pegeen)\nSeparable(pegeen)\nPixilated(pegeen)\nApocarpous(karon)\nnot Separable(karon)\nnot Braggy(karon)\nAbdicable(karon)\nPixilated(karon)\nVulturine(karon)\nforall x (Separable(x) and Pixilated(x) -> not Apocarpous(x))\nforall x (Pixilated(x) and Separable(x) -> Merited(x))\n\nnot Abdicable(pegeen)\n\nnot Abdicable(pegeen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Kingston is magical. Derrin is unhurried. Derrin is achaean. Derrin is unbaptized. Alidia is primal. Alidia is not achaean. Alidia is not magical. Alidia is selfsame. Alidia is unbaptized. Alidia is speckled. If someone is achaean and unbaptized then they are not primal. All unbaptized, achaean people are unhurried. Kingston is selfsame.", "logic": "\nMagical(kingston)\nUnhurried(derrin)\nAchaean(derrin)\nUnbaptized(derrin)\nPrimal(alidia)\nnot Achaean(alidia)\nnot Magical(alidia)\nSelfsame(alidia)\nUnbaptized(alidia)\nSpeckled(alidia)\nforall x (Achaean(x) and Unbaptized(x) -> not Primal(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) and Achaean(x) -> Unhurried(x))\n\nSelfsame(kingston)\n\nSelfsame(kingston) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1488"} {"premises": "Eugen is cyclical. Tommy is afoot. Joab is not exocrine. All afoot things are ensiform. All violative, unpressed things are ensiform. If something is ensiform then it is ruby. If something is exocrine and not cyclical then it is not ruby. If something is cyclical then it is afoot. If something is exocrine and not cyclical then it is afoot. If something is afoot and not exocrine then it is not violative. If something is exocrine then it is violative. Eugen is cyclical.", "logic": "\nCyclical(eugen)\nAfoot(tommy)\nnot Exocrine(joab)\nforall x (Afoot(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Violative(x) and Unpressed(x) -> Ensiform(x))\nforall x (Ensiform(x) -> Ruby(x))\nforall x (Exocrine(x) and not Cyclical(x) -> not Ruby(x))\nforall x (Cyclical(x) -> Afoot(x))\nforall x (Exocrine(x) and not Cyclical(x) -> Afoot(x))\nforall x (Afoot(x) and not Exocrine(x) -> not Violative(x))\nforall x (Exocrine(x) -> Violative(x))\n\nCyclical(eugen)\n\ntherefore Cyclical(eugen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Frayda is birchen. Courtney is emphasised. Luigi is not unexampled. All emphasised things are gifted. All unbounded, releasing things are gifted. If something is gifted then it is repellent. If something is unexampled and not birchen then it is not repellent. If something is birchen then it is emphasised. If something is unexampled and not birchen then it is emphasised. If something is emphasised and not unexampled then it is not unbounded. If something is unexampled then it is unbounded. Frayda is not birchen.", "logic": "\nBirchen(frayda)\nEmphasised(courtney)\nnot Unexampled(luigi)\nforall x (Emphasised(x) -> Gifted(x))\nforall x (Unbounded(x) and Releasing(x) -> Gifted(x))\nforall x (Gifted(x) -> Repellent(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and not Birchen(x) -> not Repellent(x))\nforall x (Birchen(x) -> Emphasised(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) and not Birchen(x) -> Emphasised(x))\nforall x (Emphasised(x) and not Unexampled(x) -> not Unbounded(x))\nforall x (Unexampled(x) -> Unbounded(x))\n\nnot Birchen(frayda)\n\ntherefore Birchen(frayda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Luise is nonfissile. Datha is mesozoic. Florida is not apivorous. All mesozoic things are autogenous. All octal, intoned things are autogenous. If something is autogenous then it is khaki. If something is apivorous and not nonfissile then it is not khaki. If something is nonfissile then it is mesozoic. If something is apivorous and not nonfissile then it is mesozoic. If something is mesozoic and not apivorous then it is not octal. If something is apivorous then it is octal. Luise is mesozoic.", "logic": "\nNonfissile(luise)\nMesozoic(datha)\nnot Apivorous(florida)\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Octal(x) and Intoned(x) -> Autogenous(x))\nforall x (Autogenous(x) -> Khaki(x))\nforall x (Apivorous(x) and not Nonfissile(x) -> not Khaki(x))\nforall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nforall x (Apivorous(x) and not Nonfissile(x) -> Mesozoic(x))\nforall x (Mesozoic(x) and not Apivorous(x) -> not Octal(x))\nforall x (Apivorous(x) -> Octal(x))\n\nMesozoic(luise)\n\nNonfissile(luise) and forall x (Nonfissile(x) -> Mesozoic(x)) -> therefore Mesozoic(luise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Robinson is undeniable. Kathi is meshugga. Cherry is not blond. All meshugga things are umbilical. All toothlike, clangorous things are umbilical. If something is umbilical then it is mincing. If something is blond and not undeniable then it is not mincing. If something is undeniable then it is meshugga. If something is blond and not undeniable then it is meshugga. If something is meshugga and not blond then it is not toothlike. If something is blond then it is toothlike. Kathi is not umbilical.", "logic": "\nUndeniable(robinson)\nMeshugga(kathi)\nnot Blond(cherry)\nforall x (Meshugga(x) -> Umbilical(x))\nforall x (Toothlike(x) and Clangorous(x) -> Umbilical(x))\nforall x (Umbilical(x) -> Mincing(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) and not Undeniable(x) -> not Mincing(x))\nforall x (Undeniable(x) -> Meshugga(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) and not Undeniable(x) -> Meshugga(x))\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and not Blond(x) -> not Toothlike(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) -> Toothlike(x))\n\nnot Umbilical(kathi)\n\nMeshugga(kathi) and forall x (Meshugga(x) -> Umbilical(x)) -> therefore Umbilical(kathi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Trescha is temperate. Carline is assertable. Heather is not asymmetric. All assertable things are pentatonic. All anagogical, singhalese things are pentatonic. If something is pentatonic then it is unwavering. If something is asymmetric and not temperate then it is not unwavering. If something is temperate then it is assertable. If something is asymmetric and not temperate then it is assertable. If something is assertable and not asymmetric then it is not anagogical. If something is asymmetric then it is anagogical. Carline is unwavering.", "logic": "\nTemperate(trescha)\nAssertable(carline)\nnot Asymmetric(heather)\nforall x (Assertable(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Anagogical(x) and Singhalese(x) -> Pentatonic(x))\nforall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Unwavering(x))\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) and not Temperate(x) -> not Unwavering(x))\nforall x (Temperate(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) and not Temperate(x) -> Assertable(x))\nforall x (Assertable(x) and not Asymmetric(x) -> not Anagogical(x))\nforall x (Asymmetric(x) -> Anagogical(x))\n\nUnwavering(carline)\n\nAssertable(carline) and forall x (Assertable(x) -> Pentatonic(x)) -> therefore Pentatonic(carline) Pentatonic(carline) and forall x (Pentatonic(x) -> Unwavering(x)) -> therefore Unwavering(carline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Bellanca is insanitary. Odelia is facile. Julianna is not troublous. All facile things are unhindered. All unsleeping, imitative things are unhindered. If something is unhindered then it is antibiotic. If something is troublous and not insanitary then it is not antibiotic. If something is insanitary then it is facile. If something is troublous and not insanitary then it is facile. If something is facile and not troublous then it is not unsleeping. If something is troublous then it is unsleeping. Bellanca is not unhindered.", "logic": "\nInsanitary(bellanca)\nFacile(odelia)\nnot Troublous(julianna)\nforall x (Facile(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Unsleeping(x) and Imitative(x) -> Unhindered(x))\nforall x (Unhindered(x) -> Antibiotic(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) and not Insanitary(x) -> not Antibiotic(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) and not Insanitary(x) -> Facile(x))\nforall x (Facile(x) and not Troublous(x) -> not Unsleeping(x))\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> Unsleeping(x))\n\nnot Unhindered(bellanca)\n\nInsanitary(bellanca) and forall x (Insanitary(x) -> Facile(x)) -> therefore Facile(bellanca) Facile(bellanca) and forall x (Facile(x) -> Unhindered(x)) -> therefore Unhindered(bellanca)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Lyndell is hortatory. Amelita is barehanded. Nicolas is not heralded. All barehanded things are depressed. All bitter, benthal things are depressed. If something is depressed then it is uttermost. If something is heralded and not hortatory then it is not uttermost. If something is hortatory then it is barehanded. If something is heralded and not hortatory then it is barehanded. If something is barehanded and not heralded then it is not bitter. If something is heralded then it is bitter. Lyndell is uttermost.", "logic": "\nHortatory(lyndell)\nBarehanded(amelita)\nnot Heralded(nicolas)\nforall x (Barehanded(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Bitter(x) and Benthal(x) -> Depressed(x))\nforall x (Depressed(x) -> Uttermost(x))\nforall x (Heralded(x) and not Hortatory(x) -> not Uttermost(x))\nforall x (Hortatory(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Heralded(x) and not Hortatory(x) -> Barehanded(x))\nforall x (Barehanded(x) and not Heralded(x) -> not Bitter(x))\nforall x (Heralded(x) -> Bitter(x))\n\nUttermost(lyndell)\n\nHortatory(lyndell) and forall x (Hortatory(x) -> Barehanded(x)) -> therefore Barehanded(lyndell) Barehanded(lyndell) and forall x (Barehanded(x) -> Depressed(x)) -> therefore Depressed(lyndell) Depressed(lyndell) and forall x (Depressed(x) -> Uttermost(x)) -> therefore Uttermost(lyndell)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Crystie is lymphoid. Corby is pointed. Fay is not berrylike. All pointed things are arch. All dextrous, edifying things are arch. If something is arch then it is fearful. If something is berrylike and not lymphoid then it is not fearful. If something is lymphoid then it is pointed. If something is berrylike and not lymphoid then it is pointed. If something is pointed and not berrylike then it is not dextrous. If something is berrylike then it is dextrous. Crystie is not fearful.", "logic": "\nLymphoid(crystie)\nPointed(corby)\nnot Berrylike(fay)\nforall x (Pointed(x) -> Arch(x))\nforall x (Dextrous(x) and Edifying(x) -> Arch(x))\nforall x (Arch(x) -> Fearful(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and not Lymphoid(x) -> not Fearful(x))\nforall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Pointed(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) and not Lymphoid(x) -> Pointed(x))\nforall x (Pointed(x) and not Berrylike(x) -> not Dextrous(x))\nforall x (Berrylike(x) -> Dextrous(x))\n\nnot Fearful(crystie)\n\nLymphoid(crystie) and forall x (Lymphoid(x) -> Pointed(x)) -> therefore Pointed(crystie) Pointed(crystie) and forall x (Pointed(x) -> Arch(x)) -> therefore Arch(crystie) Arch(crystie) and forall x (Arch(x) -> Fearful(x)) -> therefore Fearful(crystie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Ulla is brisk. Emily is branching. Denis is not algebraic. All branching things are exocentric. All eloquent, echt things are exocentric. If something is exocentric then it is muddled. If something is algebraic and not brisk then it is not muddled. If something is brisk then it is branching. If something is algebraic and not brisk then it is branching. If something is branching and not algebraic then it is not eloquent. If something is algebraic then it is eloquent. Denis is not eloquent.", "logic": "\nBrisk(ulla)\nBranching(emily)\nnot Algebraic(denis)\nforall x (Branching(x) -> Exocentric(x))\nforall x (Eloquent(x) and Echt(x) -> Exocentric(x))\nforall x (Exocentric(x) -> Muddled(x))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) and not Brisk(x) -> not Muddled(x))\nforall x (Brisk(x) -> Branching(x))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) and not Brisk(x) -> Branching(x))\nforall x (Branching(x) and not Algebraic(x) -> not Eloquent(x))\nforall x (Algebraic(x) -> Eloquent(x))\n\nnot Eloquent(denis)\n\nforall x (Algebraic(x) -> Eloquent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Ware is mundane. Liza is blustering. Torrey is not surface. All blustering things are curt. All tailed, apiculate things are curt. If something is curt then it is crummy. If something is surface and not mundane then it is not crummy. If something is mundane then it is blustering. If something is surface and not mundane then it is blustering. If something is blustering and not surface then it is not tailed. If something is surface then it is tailed. Torrey is crummy.", "logic": "\nMundane(ware)\nBlustering(liza)\nnot Surface(torrey)\nforall x (Blustering(x) -> Curt(x))\nforall x (Tailed(x) and Apiculate(x) -> Curt(x))\nforall x (Curt(x) -> Crummy(x))\nforall x (Surface(x) and not Mundane(x) -> not Crummy(x))\nforall x (Mundane(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Surface(x) and not Mundane(x) -> Blustering(x))\nforall x (Blustering(x) and not Surface(x) -> not Tailed(x))\nforall x (Surface(x) -> Tailed(x))\n\nCrummy(torrey)\n\nforall x (Curt(x) -> Crummy(x)) <- forall x (Blustering(x) -> Curt(x)) <- forall x (Mundane(x) -> Blustering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Lanni is stated. Winslow is booted. Gwenora is not generic. All booted things are activating. All ornery, stylised things are activating. If something is activating then it is hulking. If something is generic and not stated then it is not hulking. If something is stated then it is booted. If something is generic and not stated then it is booted. If something is booted and not generic then it is not ornery. If something is generic then it is ornery. Winslow is not ornery.", "logic": "\nStated(lanni)\nBooted(winslow)\nnot Generic(gwenora)\nforall x (Booted(x) -> Activating(x))\nforall x (Ornery(x) and Stylised(x) -> Activating(x))\nforall x (Activating(x) -> Hulking(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) and not Stated(x) -> not Hulking(x))\nforall x (Stated(x) -> Booted(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) and not Stated(x) -> Booted(x))\nforall x (Booted(x) and not Generic(x) -> not Ornery(x))\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Ornery(x))\n\nnot Ornery(winslow)\n\nforall x (Generic(x) -> Ornery(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Humphrey is deafening. Talbot is unwrinkled. Angelia is not zany. All unwrinkled things are recognized. All witty, untaped things are recognized. If something is recognized then it is jumentous. If something is zany and not deafening then it is not jumentous. If something is deafening then it is unwrinkled. If something is zany and not deafening then it is unwrinkled. If something is unwrinkled and not zany then it is not witty. If something is zany then it is witty. Angelia is unwrinkled.", "logic": "\nDeafening(humphrey)\nUnwrinkled(talbot)\nnot Zany(angelia)\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) -> Recognized(x))\nforall x (Witty(x) and Untaped(x) -> Recognized(x))\nforall x (Recognized(x) -> Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Zany(x) and not Deafening(x) -> not Jumentous(x))\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Zany(x) and not Deafening(x) -> Unwrinkled(x))\nforall x (Unwrinkled(x) and not Zany(x) -> not Witty(x))\nforall x (Zany(x) -> Witty(x))\n\nUnwrinkled(angelia)\n\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Unwrinkled(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Harli is endowed. Regen is cambodian. Mandi is not horrid. All cambodian things are perforated. All prescribed, stochastic things are perforated. If something is perforated then it is theban. If something is horrid and not endowed then it is not theban. If something is endowed then it is cambodian. If something is horrid and not endowed then it is cambodian. If something is cambodian and not horrid then it is not prescribed. If something is horrid then it is prescribed. Harli is not stochastic.", "logic": "\nEndowed(harli)\nCambodian(regen)\nnot Horrid(mandi)\nforall x (Cambodian(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Prescribed(x) and Stochastic(x) -> Perforated(x))\nforall x (Perforated(x) -> Theban(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) and not Endowed(x) -> not Theban(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Cambodian(x) and not Horrid(x) -> not Prescribed(x))\nforall x (Horrid(x) -> Prescribed(x))\n\nnot Stochastic(harli)\n\nnot Stochastic(harli) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Donni is bimodal. Jami is macedonian. Kriste is not cautious. All macedonian things are chlamydial. All unethical, silty things are chlamydial. If something is chlamydial then it is needless. If something is cautious and not bimodal then it is not needless. If something is bimodal then it is macedonian. If something is cautious and not bimodal then it is macedonian. If something is macedonian and not cautious then it is not unethical. If something is cautious then it is unethical. Kriste is bimodal.", "logic": "\nBimodal(donni)\nMacedonian(jami)\nnot Cautious(kriste)\nforall x (Macedonian(x) -> Chlamydial(x))\nforall x (Unethical(x) and Silty(x) -> Chlamydial(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) -> Needless(x))\nforall x (Cautious(x) and not Bimodal(x) -> not Needless(x))\nforall x (Bimodal(x) -> Macedonian(x))\nforall x (Cautious(x) and not Bimodal(x) -> Macedonian(x))\nforall x (Macedonian(x) and not Cautious(x) -> not Unethical(x))\nforall x (Cautious(x) -> Unethical(x))\n\nBimodal(kriste)\n\nBimodal(kriste) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Merilyn is sagging. Florina is anestrous. Abbie is not turbid. All anestrous things are irreverent. All xlii, superior things are irreverent. If something is irreverent then it is stagy. If something is turbid and not sagging then it is not stagy. If something is sagging then it is anestrous. If something is turbid and not sagging then it is anestrous. If something is anestrous and not turbid then it is not xlii. If something is turbid then it is xlii. Florina is not superior.", "logic": "\nSagging(merilyn)\nAnestrous(florina)\nnot Turbid(abbie)\nforall x (Anestrous(x) -> Irreverent(x))\nforall x (Xlii(x) and Superior(x) -> Irreverent(x))\nforall x (Irreverent(x) -> Stagy(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) and not Sagging(x) -> not Stagy(x))\nforall x (Sagging(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) and not Sagging(x) -> Anestrous(x))\nforall x (Anestrous(x) and not Turbid(x) -> not Xlii(x))\nforall x (Turbid(x) -> Xlii(x))\n\nnot Superior(florina)\n\nnot Superior(florina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Danna is gaseous. Perrine is glycogenic. Marna is not supportive. All glycogenic things are ductile. All anchoritic, sorrel things are ductile. If something is ductile then it is arbitrary. If something is supportive and not gaseous then it is not arbitrary. If something is gaseous then it is glycogenic. If something is supportive and not gaseous then it is glycogenic. If something is glycogenic and not supportive then it is not anchoritic. If something is supportive then it is anchoritic. Marna is sorrel.", "logic": "\nGaseous(danna)\nGlycogenic(perrine)\nnot Supportive(marna)\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) -> Ductile(x))\nforall x (Anchoritic(x) and Sorrel(x) -> Ductile(x))\nforall x (Ductile(x) -> Arbitrary(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) and not Gaseous(x) -> not Arbitrary(x))\nforall x (Gaseous(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) and not Gaseous(x) -> Glycogenic(x))\nforall x (Glycogenic(x) and not Supportive(x) -> not Anchoritic(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) -> Anchoritic(x))\n\nSorrel(marna)\n\nSorrel(marna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-958"} {"premises": "Lorelle is nonskid. Lorelle is plundered. Lorelle is subocean. If something is mono then it is strenuous. All strenuous things are not subocean. If something is desirable and not subocean then it is nonskid. If something is subocean and plundered then it is sure. All nonskid things are plundered. If something is subocean then it is plundered. Lorelle is subocean.", "logic": "\nNonskid(lorelle)\nPlundered(lorelle)\nSubocean(lorelle)\nforall x (Mono(x) -> Strenuous(x))\nforall x (Strenuous(x) -> not Subocean(x))\nforall x (Desirable(x) and not Subocean(x) -> Nonskid(x))\nforall x (Subocean(x) and Plundered(x) -> Sure(x))\nforall x (Nonskid(x) -> Plundered(x))\nforall x (Subocean(x) -> Plundered(x))\n\nSubocean(lorelle)\n\ntherefore Subocean(lorelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2495"} {"premises": "Marita is acapnotic. Marita is fallacious. Marita is austenitic. If something is possible then it is unpointed. All unpointed things are not austenitic. If something is exorbitant and not austenitic then it is acapnotic. If something is austenitic and fallacious then it is thenar. All acapnotic things are fallacious. If something is austenitic then it is fallacious. Marita is not austenitic.", "logic": "\nAcapnotic(marita)\nFallacious(marita)\nAustenitic(marita)\nforall x (Possible(x) -> Unpointed(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> not Austenitic(x))\nforall x (Exorbitant(x) and not Austenitic(x) -> Acapnotic(x))\nforall x (Austenitic(x) and Fallacious(x) -> Thenar(x))\nforall x (Acapnotic(x) -> Fallacious(x))\nforall x (Austenitic(x) -> Fallacious(x))\n\nnot Austenitic(marita)\n\ntherefore Austenitic(marita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2495"} {"premises": "Maddy is smiling. Maddy is guatemalan. Maddy is mendelian. If something is canescent then it is numerate. All numerate things are not mendelian. If something is niggling and not mendelian then it is smiling. If something is mendelian and guatemalan then it is vagrant. All smiling things are guatemalan. If something is mendelian then it is guatemalan. Maddy is vagrant.", "logic": "\nSmiling(maddy)\nGuatemalan(maddy)\nMendelian(maddy)\nforall x (Canescent(x) -> Numerate(x))\nforall x (Numerate(x) -> not Mendelian(x))\nforall x (Niggling(x) and not Mendelian(x) -> Smiling(x))\nforall x (Mendelian(x) and Guatemalan(x) -> Vagrant(x))\nforall x (Smiling(x) -> Guatemalan(x))\nforall x (Mendelian(x) -> Guatemalan(x))\n\nVagrant(maddy)\n\nMendelian(maddy) and Guatemalan(maddy) and forall x (Mendelian(x) and Guatemalan(x) -> Vagrant(x)) -> therefore Vagrant(maddy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2495"} {"premises": "Dorit is parisian. Dorit is joking. Dorit is iberian. If something is alimental then it is mutative. All mutative things are not iberian. If something is mammary and not iberian then it is parisian. If something is iberian and joking then it is desiccated. All parisian things are joking. If something is iberian then it is joking. Dorit is not desiccated.", "logic": "\nParisian(dorit)\nJoking(dorit)\nIberian(dorit)\nforall x (Alimental(x) -> Mutative(x))\nforall x (Mutative(x) -> not Iberian(x))\nforall x (Mammary(x) and not Iberian(x) -> Parisian(x))\nforall x (Iberian(x) and Joking(x) -> Desiccated(x))\nforall x (Parisian(x) -> Joking(x))\nforall x (Iberian(x) -> Joking(x))\n\nnot Desiccated(dorit)\n\nIberian(dorit) and Joking(dorit) and forall x (Iberian(x) and Joking(x) -> Desiccated(x)) -> therefore Desiccated(dorit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2495"} {"premises": "Batsheva is padded. Batsheva is pixilated. Batsheva is coruscant. If something is lugubrious then it is xxxvi. All xxxvi things are not coruscant. If something is attempted and not coruscant then it is padded. If something is coruscant and pixilated then it is tonguelike. All padded things are pixilated. If something is coruscant then it is pixilated. Batsheva is not xxxvi.", "logic": "\nPadded(batsheva)\nPixilated(batsheva)\nCoruscant(batsheva)\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> Xxxvi(x))\nforall x (Xxxvi(x) -> not Coruscant(x))\nforall x (Attempted(x) and not Coruscant(x) -> Padded(x))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) and Pixilated(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Padded(x) -> Pixilated(x))\nforall x (Coruscant(x) -> Pixilated(x))\n\nnot Xxxvi(batsheva)\n\nforall x (Lugubrious(x) -> Xxxvi(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2495"} {"premises": "Leonid is calcuttan. Leonid is terrifying. Leonid is attractive. If something is defamatory then it is decided. All decided things are not attractive. If something is gummed and not attractive then it is calcuttan. If something is attractive and terrifying then it is trig. All calcuttan things are terrifying. If something is attractive then it is terrifying. Leonid is defamatory.", "logic": "\nCalcuttan(leonid)\nTerrifying(leonid)\nAttractive(leonid)\nforall x (Defamatory(x) -> Decided(x))\nforall x (Decided(x) -> not Attractive(x))\nforall x (Gummed(x) and not Attractive(x) -> Calcuttan(x))\nforall x (Attractive(x) and Terrifying(x) -> Trig(x))\nforall x (Calcuttan(x) -> Terrifying(x))\nforall x (Attractive(x) -> Terrifying(x))\n\nDefamatory(leonid)\n\nDefamatory(leonid) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-2495"} {"premises": "The marisa mercerise the ruperta. The marisa is literary. The marisa correlate the kipp. The kipp mercerise the ruperta. The kipp is menstrual. The kipp action the marisa. The ruperta mercerise the kipp. If someone is stative then they like the ruperta. If someone mercerise the ruperta and they are not literary then the ruperta is not pestering. If someone action the ruperta then they do not see the ruperta. If the kipp mercerise the ruperta then the kipp is stative. If someone action the ruperta and the ruperta is stative then the ruperta does not see the marisa. If someone is pestering and they do not see the ruperta then they like the kipp. If someone mercerise the kipp then they are remarkable. If someone is remarkable and they do not like the kipp then they do not eat the kipp. The kipp mercerise the ruperta.", "logic": "\nMercerise(marisa, ruperta)\nLiterary(marisa)\nCorrelate(marisa, kipp)\nMercerise(kipp, ruperta)\nMenstrual(kipp)\nAction(kipp, marisa)\nMercerise(ruperta, kipp)\nforall x (Stative(x) -> Action(x, ruperta))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, ruperta) and not Literary(x) -> not Pestering(ruperta))\nforall x (Action(x, ruperta) -> not Correlate(x, ruperta))\nMercerise(kipp, ruperta) -> Stative(kipp)\nforall x (Action(x, ruperta) and Stative(ruperta) -> not Correlate(ruperta, marisa))\nforall x (Pestering(x) and not Correlate(x, ruperta) -> Action(x, kipp))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, kipp) -> Remarkable(x))\nforall x (Remarkable(x) and not Action(x, kipp) -> not Mercerise(x, kipp))\n\nMercerise(kipp, ruperta)\n\ntherefore Mercerise(kipp, ruperta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The dwayne stack the deva. The dwayne is shuddering. The dwayne croon the muire. The muire stack the deva. The muire is stabbing. The muire gentrify the dwayne. The deva stack the muire. If someone is metalloid then they like the deva. If someone stack the deva and they are not shuddering then the deva is not harsh. If someone gentrify the deva then they do not see the deva. If the muire stack the deva then the muire is metalloid. If someone gentrify the deva and the deva is metalloid then the deva does not see the dwayne. If someone is harsh and they do not see the deva then they like the muire. If someone stack the muire then they are myalgic. If someone is myalgic and they do not like the muire then they do not eat the muire. The deva does not eat the muire.", "logic": "\nStack(dwayne, deva)\nShuddering(dwayne)\nCroon(dwayne, muire)\nStack(muire, deva)\nStabbing(muire)\nGentrify(muire, dwayne)\nStack(deva, muire)\nforall x (Metalloid(x) -> Gentrify(x, deva))\nforall x (Stack(x, deva) and not Shuddering(x) -> not Harsh(deva))\nforall x (Gentrify(x, deva) -> not Croon(x, deva))\nStack(muire, deva) -> Metalloid(muire)\nforall x (Gentrify(x, deva) and Metalloid(deva) -> not Croon(deva, dwayne))\nforall x (Harsh(x) and not Croon(x, deva) -> Gentrify(x, muire))\nforall x (Stack(x, muire) -> Myalgic(x))\nforall x (Myalgic(x) and not Gentrify(x, muire) -> not Stack(x, muire))\n\nnot Stack(deva, muire)\n\ntherefore Stack(deva, muire)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The thomasa attack the pip. The thomasa is biannual. The thomasa welsh the gray. The gray attack the pip. The gray is bilateral. The gray flare the thomasa. The pip attack the gray. If someone is gentile then they like the pip. If someone attack the pip and they are not biannual then the pip is not arthritic. If someone flare the pip then they do not see the pip. If the gray attack the pip then the gray is gentile. If someone flare the pip and the pip is gentile then the pip does not see the thomasa. If someone is arthritic and they do not see the pip then they like the gray. If someone attack the gray then they are brainy. If someone is brainy and they do not like the gray then they do not eat the gray. The gray is gentile.", "logic": "\nAttack(thomasa, pip)\nBiannual(thomasa)\nWelsh(thomasa, gray)\nAttack(gray, pip)\nBilateral(gray)\nFlare(gray, thomasa)\nAttack(pip, gray)\nforall x (Gentile(x) -> Flare(x, pip))\nforall x (Attack(x, pip) and not Biannual(x) -> not Arthritic(pip))\nforall x (Flare(x, pip) -> not Welsh(x, pip))\nAttack(gray, pip) -> Gentile(gray)\nforall x (Flare(x, pip) and Gentile(pip) -> not Welsh(pip, thomasa))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and not Welsh(x, pip) -> Flare(x, gray))\nforall x (Attack(x, gray) -> Brainy(x))\nforall x (Brainy(x) and not Flare(x, gray) -> not Attack(x, gray))\n\nGentile(gray)\n\nAttack(gray, pip) and Attack(gray, pip) -> Gentile(gray) -> therefore Gentile(gray)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The vern unlace the courtney. The vern is lesser. The vern crap the chery. The chery unlace the courtney. The chery is bothersome. The chery kink the vern. The courtney unlace the chery. If someone is buddhist then they like the courtney. If someone unlace the courtney and they are not lesser then the courtney is not contented. If someone kink the courtney then they do not see the courtney. If the chery unlace the courtney then the chery is buddhist. If someone kink the courtney and the courtney is buddhist then the courtney does not see the vern. If someone is contented and they do not see the courtney then they like the chery. If someone unlace the chery then they are aligning. If someone is aligning and they do not like the chery then they do not eat the chery. The chery is not buddhist.", "logic": "\nUnlace(vern, courtney)\nLesser(vern)\nCrap(vern, chery)\nUnlace(chery, courtney)\nBothersome(chery)\nKink(chery, vern)\nUnlace(courtney, chery)\nforall x (Buddhist(x) -> Kink(x, courtney))\nforall x (Unlace(x, courtney) and not Lesser(x) -> not Contented(courtney))\nforall x (Kink(x, courtney) -> not Crap(x, courtney))\nUnlace(chery, courtney) -> Buddhist(chery)\nforall x (Kink(x, courtney) and Buddhist(courtney) -> not Crap(courtney, vern))\nforall x (Contented(x) and not Crap(x, courtney) -> Kink(x, chery))\nforall x (Unlace(x, chery) -> Aligning(x))\nforall x (Aligning(x) and not Kink(x, chery) -> not Unlace(x, chery))\n\nnot Buddhist(chery)\n\nUnlace(chery, courtney) and Unlace(chery, courtney) -> Buddhist(chery) -> therefore Buddhist(chery)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The latia unbalance the cynthy. The latia is prepared. The latia berate the clarisa. The clarisa unbalance the cynthy. The clarisa is mucosal. The clarisa yaup the latia. The cynthy unbalance the clarisa. If someone is productive then they like the cynthy. If someone unbalance the cynthy and they are not prepared then the cynthy is not shakable. If someone yaup the cynthy then they do not see the cynthy. If the clarisa unbalance the cynthy then the clarisa is productive. If someone yaup the cynthy and the cynthy is productive then the cynthy does not see the latia. If someone is shakable and they do not see the cynthy then they like the clarisa. If someone unbalance the clarisa then they are pursued. If someone is pursued and they do not like the clarisa then they do not eat the clarisa. The clarisa yaup the cynthy.", "logic": "\nUnbalance(latia, cynthy)\nPrepared(latia)\nBerate(latia, clarisa)\nUnbalance(clarisa, cynthy)\nMucosal(clarisa)\nYaup(clarisa, latia)\nUnbalance(cynthy, clarisa)\nforall x (Productive(x) -> Yaup(x, cynthy))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, cynthy) and not Prepared(x) -> not Shakable(cynthy))\nforall x (Yaup(x, cynthy) -> not Berate(x, cynthy))\nUnbalance(clarisa, cynthy) -> Productive(clarisa)\nforall x (Yaup(x, cynthy) and Productive(cynthy) -> not Berate(cynthy, latia))\nforall x (Shakable(x) and not Berate(x, cynthy) -> Yaup(x, clarisa))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, clarisa) -> Pursued(x))\nforall x (Pursued(x) and not Yaup(x, clarisa) -> not Unbalance(x, clarisa))\n\nYaup(clarisa, cynthy)\n\nUnbalance(clarisa, cynthy) and Unbalance(clarisa, cynthy) -> Productive(clarisa) -> therefore Productive(clarisa) Productive(clarisa) and forall x (Productive(x) -> Yaup(x, cynthy)) -> therefore Yaup(clarisa, cynthy)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The maxine disinvolve the mirelle. The maxine is pedal. The maxine triumph the darren. The darren disinvolve the mirelle. The darren is seminal. The darren debut the maxine. The mirelle disinvolve the darren. If someone is scopal then they like the mirelle. If someone disinvolve the mirelle and they are not pedal then the mirelle is not amatory. If someone debut the mirelle then they do not see the mirelle. If the darren disinvolve the mirelle then the darren is scopal. If someone debut the mirelle and the mirelle is scopal then the mirelle does not see the maxine. If someone is amatory and they do not see the mirelle then they like the darren. If someone disinvolve the darren then they are bacchantic. If someone is bacchantic and they do not like the darren then they do not eat the darren. The darren does not like the mirelle.", "logic": "\nDisinvolve(maxine, mirelle)\nPedal(maxine)\nTriumph(maxine, darren)\nDisinvolve(darren, mirelle)\nSeminal(darren)\nDebut(darren, maxine)\nDisinvolve(mirelle, darren)\nforall x (Scopal(x) -> Debut(x, mirelle))\nforall x (Disinvolve(x, mirelle) and not Pedal(x) -> not Amatory(mirelle))\nforall x (Debut(x, mirelle) -> not Triumph(x, mirelle))\nDisinvolve(darren, mirelle) -> Scopal(darren)\nforall x (Debut(x, mirelle) and Scopal(mirelle) -> not Triumph(mirelle, maxine))\nforall x (Amatory(x) and not Triumph(x, mirelle) -> Debut(x, darren))\nforall x (Disinvolve(x, darren) -> Bacchantic(x))\nforall x (Bacchantic(x) and not Debut(x, darren) -> not Disinvolve(x, darren))\n\nnot Debut(darren, mirelle)\n\nDisinvolve(darren, mirelle) and Disinvolve(darren, mirelle) -> Scopal(darren) -> therefore Scopal(darren) Scopal(darren) and forall x (Scopal(x) -> Debut(x, mirelle)) -> therefore Debut(darren, mirelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The urbain chisel the kristina. The urbain is arched. The urbain swinge the adorne. The adorne chisel the kristina. The adorne is isolating. The adorne acquit the urbain. The kristina chisel the adorne. If someone is flat then they like the kristina. If someone chisel the kristina and they are not arched then the kristina is not reluctant. If someone acquit the kristina then they do not see the kristina. If the adorne chisel the kristina then the adorne is flat. If someone acquit the kristina and the kristina is flat then the kristina does not see the urbain. If someone is reluctant and they do not see the kristina then they like the adorne. If someone chisel the adorne then they are executable. If someone is executable and they do not like the adorne then they do not eat the adorne. The adorne does not see the kristina.", "logic": "\nChisel(urbain, kristina)\nArched(urbain)\nSwinge(urbain, adorne)\nChisel(adorne, kristina)\nIsolating(adorne)\nAcquit(adorne, urbain)\nChisel(kristina, adorne)\nforall x (Flat(x) -> Acquit(x, kristina))\nforall x (Chisel(x, kristina) and not Arched(x) -> not Reluctant(kristina))\nforall x (Acquit(x, kristina) -> not Swinge(x, kristina))\nChisel(adorne, kristina) -> Flat(adorne)\nforall x (Acquit(x, kristina) and Flat(kristina) -> not Swinge(kristina, urbain))\nforall x (Reluctant(x) and not Swinge(x, kristina) -> Acquit(x, adorne))\nforall x (Chisel(x, adorne) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Executable(x) and not Acquit(x, adorne) -> not Chisel(x, adorne))\n\nnot Swinge(adorne, kristina)\n\nChisel(adorne, kristina) and Chisel(adorne, kristina) -> Flat(adorne) -> therefore Flat(adorne) Flat(adorne) and forall x (Flat(x) -> Acquit(x, kristina)) -> therefore Acquit(adorne, kristina) Acquit(adorne, kristina) and forall x (Acquit(x, kristina) -> not Swinge(x, kristina)) -> therefore not Swinge(adorne, kristina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The margret cannulate the philippe. The margret is daunting. The margret doctor the jeanne. The jeanne cannulate the philippe. The jeanne is eparchial. The jeanne trace the margret. The philippe cannulate the jeanne. If someone is absurd then they like the philippe. If someone cannulate the philippe and they are not daunting then the philippe is not negroid. If someone trace the philippe then they do not see the philippe. If the jeanne cannulate the philippe then the jeanne is absurd. If someone trace the philippe and the philippe is absurd then the philippe does not see the margret. If someone is negroid and they do not see the philippe then they like the jeanne. If someone cannulate the jeanne then they are carsick. If someone is carsick and they do not like the jeanne then they do not eat the jeanne. The jeanne doctor the philippe.", "logic": "\nCannulate(margret, philippe)\nDaunting(margret)\nDoctor(margret, jeanne)\nCannulate(jeanne, philippe)\nEparchial(jeanne)\nTrace(jeanne, margret)\nCannulate(philippe, jeanne)\nforall x (Absurd(x) -> Trace(x, philippe))\nforall x (Cannulate(x, philippe) and not Daunting(x) -> not Negroid(philippe))\nforall x (Trace(x, philippe) -> not Doctor(x, philippe))\nCannulate(jeanne, philippe) -> Absurd(jeanne)\nforall x (Trace(x, philippe) and Absurd(philippe) -> not Doctor(philippe, margret))\nforall x (Negroid(x) and not Doctor(x, philippe) -> Trace(x, jeanne))\nforall x (Cannulate(x, jeanne) -> Carsick(x))\nforall x (Carsick(x) and not Trace(x, jeanne) -> not Cannulate(x, jeanne))\n\nDoctor(jeanne, philippe)\n\nCannulate(jeanne, philippe) and Cannulate(jeanne, philippe) -> Absurd(jeanne) -> therefore Absurd(jeanne) Absurd(jeanne) and forall x (Absurd(x) -> Trace(x, philippe)) -> therefore Trace(jeanne, philippe) Trace(jeanne, philippe) and forall x (Trace(x, philippe) -> not Doctor(x, philippe)) -> therefore not Doctor(jeanne, philippe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The burta badmouth the rudyard. The burta is ctenoid. The burta tamp the danielle. The danielle badmouth the rudyard. The danielle is appareled. The danielle mongrelize the burta. The rudyard badmouth the danielle. If someone is aberdonian then they like the rudyard. If someone badmouth the rudyard and they are not ctenoid then the rudyard is not decent. If someone mongrelize the rudyard then they do not see the rudyard. If the danielle badmouth the rudyard then the danielle is aberdonian. If someone mongrelize the rudyard and the rudyard is aberdonian then the rudyard does not see the burta. If someone is decent and they do not see the rudyard then they like the danielle. If someone badmouth the danielle then they are lilting. If someone is lilting and they do not like the danielle then they do not eat the danielle. The burta does not like the rudyard.", "logic": "\nBadmouth(burta, rudyard)\nCtenoid(burta)\nTamp(burta, danielle)\nBadmouth(danielle, rudyard)\nAppareled(danielle)\nMongrelize(danielle, burta)\nBadmouth(rudyard, danielle)\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Mongrelize(x, rudyard))\nforall x (Badmouth(x, rudyard) and not Ctenoid(x) -> not Decent(rudyard))\nforall x (Mongrelize(x, rudyard) -> not Tamp(x, rudyard))\nBadmouth(danielle, rudyard) -> Aberdonian(danielle)\nforall x (Mongrelize(x, rudyard) and Aberdonian(rudyard) -> not Tamp(rudyard, burta))\nforall x (Decent(x) and not Tamp(x, rudyard) -> Mongrelize(x, danielle))\nforall x (Badmouth(x, danielle) -> Lilting(x))\nforall x (Lilting(x) and not Mongrelize(x, danielle) -> not Badmouth(x, danielle))\n\nnot Mongrelize(burta, rudyard)\n\nforall x (Aberdonian(x) -> Mongrelize(x, rudyard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The sheena cover the katusha. The sheena is spanish. The sheena revitalise the rosina. The rosina cover the katusha. The rosina is monogenic. The rosina degauss the sheena. The katusha cover the rosina. If someone is wearable then they like the katusha. If someone cover the katusha and they are not spanish then the katusha is not senile. If someone degauss the katusha then they do not see the katusha. If the rosina cover the katusha then the rosina is wearable. If someone degauss the katusha and the katusha is wearable then the katusha does not see the sheena. If someone is senile and they do not see the katusha then they like the rosina. If someone cover the rosina then they are advertised. If someone is advertised and they do not like the rosina then they do not eat the rosina. The rosina is advertised.", "logic": "\nCover(sheena, katusha)\nSpanish(sheena)\nRevitalise(sheena, rosina)\nCover(rosina, katusha)\nMonogenic(rosina)\nDegauss(rosina, sheena)\nCover(katusha, rosina)\nforall x (Wearable(x) -> Degauss(x, katusha))\nforall x (Cover(x, katusha) and not Spanish(x) -> not Senile(katusha))\nforall x (Degauss(x, katusha) -> not Revitalise(x, katusha))\nCover(rosina, katusha) -> Wearable(rosina)\nforall x (Degauss(x, katusha) and Wearable(katusha) -> not Revitalise(katusha, sheena))\nforall x (Senile(x) and not Revitalise(x, katusha) -> Degauss(x, rosina))\nforall x (Cover(x, rosina) -> Advertised(x))\nforall x (Advertised(x) and not Degauss(x, rosina) -> not Cover(x, rosina))\n\nAdvertised(rosina)\n\nforall x (Cover(x, rosina) -> Advertised(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The anica improvize the hollie. The anica is simian. The anica lacerate the preston. The preston improvize the hollie. The preston is mancunian. The preston interweave the anica. The hollie improvize the preston. If someone is nonprofit then they like the hollie. If someone improvize the hollie and they are not simian then the hollie is not bullate. If someone interweave the hollie then they do not see the hollie. If the preston improvize the hollie then the preston is nonprofit. If someone interweave the hollie and the hollie is nonprofit then the hollie does not see the anica. If someone is bullate and they do not see the hollie then they like the preston. If someone improvize the preston then they are gnomish. If someone is gnomish and they do not like the preston then they do not eat the preston. The preston does not like the preston.", "logic": "\nImprovize(anica, hollie)\nSimian(anica)\nLacerate(anica, preston)\nImprovize(preston, hollie)\nMancunian(preston)\nInterweave(preston, anica)\nImprovize(hollie, preston)\nforall x (Nonprofit(x) -> Interweave(x, hollie))\nforall x (Improvize(x, hollie) and not Simian(x) -> not Bullate(hollie))\nforall x (Interweave(x, hollie) -> not Lacerate(x, hollie))\nImprovize(preston, hollie) -> Nonprofit(preston)\nforall x (Interweave(x, hollie) and Nonprofit(hollie) -> not Lacerate(hollie, anica))\nforall x (Bullate(x) and not Lacerate(x, hollie) -> Interweave(x, preston))\nforall x (Improvize(x, preston) -> Gnomish(x))\nforall x (Gnomish(x) and not Interweave(x, preston) -> not Improvize(x, preston))\n\nnot Interweave(preston, preston)\n\nforall x (Bullate(x) and not Lacerate(x, hollie) -> Interweave(x, preston)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The joy chastise the antonius. The joy is bestubbled. The joy comminute the enid. The enid chastise the antonius. The enid is acerate. The enid beautify the joy. The antonius chastise the enid. If someone is spotty then they like the antonius. If someone chastise the antonius and they are not bestubbled then the antonius is not mortified. If someone beautify the antonius then they do not see the antonius. If the enid chastise the antonius then the enid is spotty. If someone beautify the antonius and the antonius is spotty then the antonius does not see the joy. If someone is mortified and they do not see the antonius then they like the enid. If someone chastise the enid then they are squiffy. If someone is squiffy and they do not like the enid then they do not eat the enid. The antonius beautify the antonius.", "logic": "\nChastise(joy, antonius)\nBestubbled(joy)\nComminute(joy, enid)\nChastise(enid, antonius)\nAcerate(enid)\nBeautify(enid, joy)\nChastise(antonius, enid)\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Beautify(x, antonius))\nforall x (Chastise(x, antonius) and not Bestubbled(x) -> not Mortified(antonius))\nforall x (Beautify(x, antonius) -> not Comminute(x, antonius))\nChastise(enid, antonius) -> Spotty(enid)\nforall x (Beautify(x, antonius) and Spotty(antonius) -> not Comminute(antonius, joy))\nforall x (Mortified(x) and not Comminute(x, antonius) -> Beautify(x, enid))\nforall x (Chastise(x, enid) -> Squiffy(x))\nforall x (Squiffy(x) and not Beautify(x, enid) -> not Chastise(x, enid))\n\nBeautify(antonius, antonius)\n\nforall x (Spotty(x) -> Beautify(x, antonius)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The waldo brake the hagan. The waldo is unholy. The waldo dart the rafe. The rafe brake the hagan. The rafe is ethnologic. The rafe interlope the waldo. The hagan brake the rafe. If someone is shrimpy then they like the hagan. If someone brake the hagan and they are not unholy then the hagan is not valved. If someone interlope the hagan then they do not see the hagan. If the rafe brake the hagan then the rafe is shrimpy. If someone interlope the hagan and the hagan is shrimpy then the hagan does not see the waldo. If someone is valved and they do not see the hagan then they like the rafe. If someone brake the rafe then they are glary. If someone is glary and they do not like the rafe then they do not eat the rafe. The rafe does not eat the rafe.", "logic": "\nBrake(waldo, hagan)\nUnholy(waldo)\nDart(waldo, rafe)\nBrake(rafe, hagan)\nEthnologic(rafe)\nInterlope(rafe, waldo)\nBrake(hagan, rafe)\nforall x (Shrimpy(x) -> Interlope(x, hagan))\nforall x (Brake(x, hagan) and not Unholy(x) -> not Valved(hagan))\nforall x (Interlope(x, hagan) -> not Dart(x, hagan))\nBrake(rafe, hagan) -> Shrimpy(rafe)\nforall x (Interlope(x, hagan) and Shrimpy(hagan) -> not Dart(hagan, waldo))\nforall x (Valved(x) and not Dart(x, hagan) -> Interlope(x, rafe))\nforall x (Brake(x, rafe) -> Glary(x))\nforall x (Glary(x) and not Interlope(x, rafe) -> not Brake(x, rafe))\n\nnot Brake(rafe, rafe)\n\nnot Brake(rafe, rafe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The alicea mantle the ervin. The alicea is cancelled. The alicea overclothe the tony. The tony mantle the ervin. The tony is xciii. The tony swoon the alicea. The ervin mantle the tony. If someone is ulcerous then they like the ervin. If someone mantle the ervin and they are not cancelled then the ervin is not extensive. If someone swoon the ervin then they do not see the ervin. If the tony mantle the ervin then the tony is ulcerous. If someone swoon the ervin and the ervin is ulcerous then the ervin does not see the alicea. If someone is extensive and they do not see the ervin then they like the tony. If someone mantle the tony then they are redeeming. If someone is redeeming and they do not like the tony then they do not eat the tony. The ervin mantle the alicea.", "logic": "\nMantle(alicea, ervin)\nCancelled(alicea)\nOverclothe(alicea, tony)\nMantle(tony, ervin)\nXciii(tony)\nSwoon(tony, alicea)\nMantle(ervin, tony)\nforall x (Ulcerous(x) -> Swoon(x, ervin))\nforall x (Mantle(x, ervin) and not Cancelled(x) -> not Extensive(ervin))\nforall x (Swoon(x, ervin) -> not Overclothe(x, ervin))\nMantle(tony, ervin) -> Ulcerous(tony)\nforall x (Swoon(x, ervin) and Ulcerous(ervin) -> not Overclothe(ervin, alicea))\nforall x (Extensive(x) and not Overclothe(x, ervin) -> Swoon(x, tony))\nforall x (Mantle(x, tony) -> Redeeming(x))\nforall x (Redeeming(x) and not Swoon(x, tony) -> not Mantle(x, tony))\n\nMantle(ervin, alicea)\n\nMantle(ervin, alicea) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The jose shatter the rusty. The jose is caramel. The jose centralize the giralda. The giralda shatter the rusty. The giralda is vestal. The giralda submerse the jose. The rusty shatter the giralda. If someone is bailable then they like the rusty. If someone shatter the rusty and they are not caramel then the rusty is not separate. If someone submerse the rusty then they do not see the rusty. If the giralda shatter the rusty then the giralda is bailable. If someone submerse the rusty and the rusty is bailable then the rusty does not see the jose. If someone is separate and they do not see the rusty then they like the giralda. If someone shatter the giralda then they are oxidizable. If someone is oxidizable and they do not like the giralda then they do not eat the giralda. The jose does not like the jose.", "logic": "\nShatter(jose, rusty)\nCaramel(jose)\nCentralize(jose, giralda)\nShatter(giralda, rusty)\nVestal(giralda)\nSubmerse(giralda, jose)\nShatter(rusty, giralda)\nforall x (Bailable(x) -> Submerse(x, rusty))\nforall x (Shatter(x, rusty) and not Caramel(x) -> not Separate(rusty))\nforall x (Submerse(x, rusty) -> not Centralize(x, rusty))\nShatter(giralda, rusty) -> Bailable(giralda)\nforall x (Submerse(x, rusty) and Bailable(rusty) -> not Centralize(rusty, jose))\nforall x (Separate(x) and not Centralize(x, rusty) -> Submerse(x, giralda))\nforall x (Shatter(x, giralda) -> Oxidizable(x))\nforall x (Oxidizable(x) and not Submerse(x, giralda) -> not Shatter(x, giralda))\n\nnot Submerse(jose, jose)\n\nnot Submerse(jose, jose) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "The tiffanie unclasp the myrle. The tiffanie is tubelike. The tiffanie gore the grayce. The grayce unclasp the myrle. The grayce is gabby. The grayce bode the tiffanie. The myrle unclasp the grayce. If someone is xxiii then they like the myrle. If someone unclasp the myrle and they are not tubelike then the myrle is not rootless. If someone bode the myrle then they do not see the myrle. If the grayce unclasp the myrle then the grayce is xxiii. If someone bode the myrle and the myrle is xxiii then the myrle does not see the tiffanie. If someone is rootless and they do not see the myrle then they like the grayce. If someone unclasp the grayce then they are blond. If someone is blond and they do not like the grayce then they do not eat the grayce. The grayce is tubelike.", "logic": "\nUnclasp(tiffanie, myrle)\nTubelike(tiffanie)\nGore(tiffanie, grayce)\nUnclasp(grayce, myrle)\nGabby(grayce)\nBode(grayce, tiffanie)\nUnclasp(myrle, grayce)\nforall x (Xxiii(x) -> Bode(x, myrle))\nforall x (Unclasp(x, myrle) and not Tubelike(x) -> not Rootless(myrle))\nforall x (Bode(x, myrle) -> not Gore(x, myrle))\nUnclasp(grayce, myrle) -> Xxiii(grayce)\nforall x (Bode(x, myrle) and Xxiii(myrle) -> not Gore(myrle, tiffanie))\nforall x (Rootless(x) and not Gore(x, myrle) -> Bode(x, grayce))\nforall x (Unclasp(x, grayce) -> Blond(x))\nforall x (Blond(x) and not Bode(x, grayce) -> not Unclasp(x, grayce))\n\nTubelike(grayce)\n\nTubelike(grayce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-1311"} {"premises": "Grayce is currish. Grayce is jagged. Grayce is biogenous. Tiena is quack. Tiena is currish. Tiena is satirical. Tiena is banner. Tiena is biogenous. Tiena is nosocomial. Danna is quack. Danna is currish. Danna is satirical. Danna is jagged. Danna is banner. Danna is biogenous. Danna is nosocomial. If something is banner then it is jagged. If something is jagged and satirical then it is currish. Danna is satirical.", "logic": "\nCurrish(grayce)\nJagged(grayce)\nBiogenous(grayce)\nQuack(tiena)\nCurrish(tiena)\nSatirical(tiena)\nBanner(tiena)\nBiogenous(tiena)\nNosocomial(tiena)\nQuack(danna)\nCurrish(danna)\nSatirical(danna)\nJagged(danna)\nBanner(danna)\nBiogenous(danna)\nNosocomial(danna)\nforall x (Banner(x) -> Jagged(x))\nforall x (Jagged(x) and Satirical(x) -> Currish(x))\n\nSatirical(danna)\n\ntherefore Satirical(danna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2572"} {"premises": "Lewis is skewed. Lewis is uncombable. Lewis is vehicular. Dina is median. Dina is skewed. Dina is riveting. Dina is brunette. Dina is vehicular. Dina is compliant. Nike is median. Nike is skewed. Nike is riveting. Nike is uncombable. Nike is brunette. Nike is vehicular. Nike is compliant. If something is brunette then it is uncombable. If something is uncombable and riveting then it is skewed. Dina is not median.", "logic": "\nSkewed(lewis)\nUncombable(lewis)\nVehicular(lewis)\nMedian(dina)\nSkewed(dina)\nRiveting(dina)\nBrunette(dina)\nVehicular(dina)\nCompliant(dina)\nMedian(nike)\nSkewed(nike)\nRiveting(nike)\nUncombable(nike)\nBrunette(nike)\nVehicular(nike)\nCompliant(nike)\nforall x (Brunette(x) -> Uncombable(x))\nforall x (Uncombable(x) and Riveting(x) -> Skewed(x))\n\nnot Median(dina)\n\ntherefore Median(dina)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2572"} {"premises": "Caroline is subocean. Caroline is tonguelike. Caroline is braw. Gerty is acquainted. Gerty is subocean. Gerty is clownlike. Gerty is telescopic. Gerty is braw. Gerty is endoscopic. Emmalynne is acquainted. Emmalynne is subocean. Emmalynne is clownlike. Emmalynne is tonguelike. Emmalynne is telescopic. Emmalynne is braw. Emmalynne is endoscopic. If something is telescopic then it is tonguelike. If something is tonguelike and clownlike then it is subocean. Caroline is not clownlike.", "logic": "\nSubocean(caroline)\nTonguelike(caroline)\nBraw(caroline)\nAcquainted(gerty)\nSubocean(gerty)\nClownlike(gerty)\nTelescopic(gerty)\nBraw(gerty)\nEndoscopic(gerty)\nAcquainted(emmalynne)\nSubocean(emmalynne)\nClownlike(emmalynne)\nTonguelike(emmalynne)\nTelescopic(emmalynne)\nBraw(emmalynne)\nEndoscopic(emmalynne)\nforall x (Telescopic(x) -> Tonguelike(x))\nforall x (Tonguelike(x) and Clownlike(x) -> Subocean(x))\n\nnot Clownlike(caroline)\n\nnot Clownlike(caroline) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2572"} {"premises": "Lucas is absorptive. Lucas is reasoning. Lucas is biting. Berni is opaque. Berni is absorptive. Berni is scheduled. Berni is crisscross. Berni is biting. Berni is achy. Leonora is opaque. Leonora is absorptive. Leonora is scheduled. Leonora is reasoning. Leonora is crisscross. Leonora is biting. Leonora is achy. If something is crisscross then it is reasoning. If something is reasoning and scheduled then it is absorptive. Lucas is crisscross.", "logic": "\nAbsorptive(lucas)\nReasoning(lucas)\nBiting(lucas)\nOpaque(berni)\nAbsorptive(berni)\nScheduled(berni)\nCrisscross(berni)\nBiting(berni)\nAchy(berni)\nOpaque(leonora)\nAbsorptive(leonora)\nScheduled(leonora)\nReasoning(leonora)\nCrisscross(leonora)\nBiting(leonora)\nAchy(leonora)\nforall x (Crisscross(x) -> Reasoning(x))\nforall x (Reasoning(x) and Scheduled(x) -> Absorptive(x))\n\nCrisscross(lucas)\n\nCrisscross(lucas) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2572"} {"premises": "Rochelle is cleared. Kaspar is cleared. Lewis is terefah. Valentin is piratical. White, piratical things are cleared. If something is piratical then it is evaporated. All cleared things are terefah. Valentin is piratical.", "logic": "\nCleared(rochelle)\nCleared(kaspar)\nTerefah(lewis)\nPiratical(valentin)\nforall x (Evaporated(x) and Piratical(x) -> Cleared(x))\nforall x (Piratical(x) -> Evaporated(x))\nforall x (Cleared(x) -> Terefah(x))\n\nPiratical(valentin)\n\ntherefore Piratical(valentin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Alys is suppliant. Graeme is suppliant. Lilah is sliced. Forrester is scary. White, scary things are suppliant. If something is scary then it is sceptred. All suppliant things are sliced. Lilah is not sliced.", "logic": "\nSuppliant(alys)\nSuppliant(graeme)\nSliced(lilah)\nScary(forrester)\nforall x (Sceptred(x) and Scary(x) -> Suppliant(x))\nforall x (Scary(x) -> Sceptred(x))\nforall x (Suppliant(x) -> Sliced(x))\n\nnot Sliced(lilah)\n\ntherefore Sliced(lilah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Sibyl is airtight. Natalia is airtight. Northrop is provident. Carina is dehiscent. White, dehiscent things are airtight. If something is dehiscent then it is perversive. All airtight things are provident. Sibyl is provident.", "logic": "\nAirtight(sibyl)\nAirtight(natalia)\nProvident(northrop)\nDehiscent(carina)\nforall x (Perversive(x) and Dehiscent(x) -> Airtight(x))\nforall x (Dehiscent(x) -> Perversive(x))\nforall x (Airtight(x) -> Provident(x))\n\nProvident(sibyl)\n\nAirtight(sibyl) and forall x (Airtight(x) -> Provident(x)) -> therefore Provident(sibyl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Abigail is nosohusial. Diannne is nosohusial. Newton is blistering. Fitz is boric. White, boric things are nosohusial. If something is boric then it is aboulic. All nosohusial things are blistering. Diannne is not blistering.", "logic": "\nNosohusial(abigail)\nNosohusial(diannne)\nBlistering(newton)\nBoric(fitz)\nforall x (Aboulic(x) and Boric(x) -> Nosohusial(x))\nforall x (Boric(x) -> Aboulic(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) -> Blistering(x))\n\nnot Blistering(diannne)\n\nNosohusial(diannne) and forall x (Nosohusial(x) -> Blistering(x)) -> therefore Blistering(diannne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Mendie is ultrasonic. Lorine is ultrasonic. Millicent is unpromised. Noelle is moveable. White, moveable things are ultrasonic. If something is moveable then it is ivied. All ultrasonic things are unpromised. Noelle is ultrasonic.", "logic": "\nUltrasonic(mendie)\nUltrasonic(lorine)\nUnpromised(millicent)\nMoveable(noelle)\nforall x (Ivied(x) and Moveable(x) -> Ultrasonic(x))\nforall x (Moveable(x) -> Ivied(x))\nforall x (Ultrasonic(x) -> Unpromised(x))\n\nUltrasonic(noelle)\n\nMoveable(noelle) and forall x (Moveable(x) -> Ivied(x)) -> therefore Ivied(noelle) Ivied(noelle) and Moveable(noelle) and forall x (Ivied(x) and Moveable(x) -> Ultrasonic(x)) -> therefore Ultrasonic(noelle)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Minerva is choosey. Verney is choosey. Sibyl is bulging. Corwin is clever. White, clever things are choosey. If something is clever then it is mysophobic. All choosey things are bulging. Corwin is not choosey.", "logic": "\nChoosey(minerva)\nChoosey(verney)\nBulging(sibyl)\nClever(corwin)\nforall x (Mysophobic(x) and Clever(x) -> Choosey(x))\nforall x (Clever(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Choosey(x) -> Bulging(x))\n\nnot Choosey(corwin)\n\nClever(corwin) and forall x (Clever(x) -> Mysophobic(x)) -> therefore Mysophobic(corwin) Mysophobic(corwin) and Clever(corwin) and forall x (Mysophobic(x) and Clever(x) -> Choosey(x)) -> therefore Choosey(corwin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Heywood is sensorial. Alix is sensorial. Leonerd is blaring. Marcia is dermic. White, dermic things are sensorial. If something is dermic then it is liberated. All sensorial things are blaring. Marcia is blaring.", "logic": "\nSensorial(heywood)\nSensorial(alix)\nBlaring(leonerd)\nDermic(marcia)\nforall x (Liberated(x) and Dermic(x) -> Sensorial(x))\nforall x (Dermic(x) -> Liberated(x))\nforall x (Sensorial(x) -> Blaring(x))\n\nBlaring(marcia)\n\nDermic(marcia) and forall x (Dermic(x) -> Liberated(x)) -> therefore Liberated(marcia) Liberated(marcia) and Dermic(marcia) and forall x (Liberated(x) and Dermic(x) -> Sensorial(x)) -> therefore Sensorial(marcia) Sensorial(marcia) and forall x (Sensorial(x) -> Blaring(x)) -> therefore Blaring(marcia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Schuyler is faddish. Teodoro is faddish. Lurette is disparate. Kizzie is domed. White, domed things are faddish. If something is domed then it is prime. All faddish things are disparate. Kizzie is not disparate.", "logic": "\nFaddish(schuyler)\nFaddish(teodoro)\nDisparate(lurette)\nDomed(kizzie)\nforall x (Prime(x) and Domed(x) -> Faddish(x))\nforall x (Domed(x) -> Prime(x))\nforall x (Faddish(x) -> Disparate(x))\n\nnot Disparate(kizzie)\n\nDomed(kizzie) and forall x (Domed(x) -> Prime(x)) -> therefore Prime(kizzie) Prime(kizzie) and Domed(kizzie) and forall x (Prime(x) and Domed(x) -> Faddish(x)) -> therefore Faddish(kizzie) Faddish(kizzie) and forall x (Faddish(x) -> Disparate(x)) -> therefore Disparate(kizzie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Trever is jocular. Kalila is jocular. Angelita is sufficient. Kamila is inboard. White, inboard things are jocular. If something is inboard then it is bizarre. All jocular things are sufficient. Kalila is not bizarre.", "logic": "\nJocular(trever)\nJocular(kalila)\nSufficient(angelita)\nInboard(kamila)\nforall x (Bizarre(x) and Inboard(x) -> Jocular(x))\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> Bizarre(x))\nforall x (Jocular(x) -> Sufficient(x))\n\nnot Bizarre(kalila)\n\nforall x (Inboard(x) -> Bizarre(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Philipa is untactful. Malissia is untactful. Franciska is loth. Clarice is sore. White, sore things are untactful. If something is sore then it is respective. All untactful things are loth. Franciska is untactful.", "logic": "\nUntactful(philipa)\nUntactful(malissia)\nLoth(franciska)\nSore(clarice)\nforall x (Respective(x) and Sore(x) -> Untactful(x))\nforall x (Sore(x) -> Respective(x))\nforall x (Untactful(x) -> Loth(x))\n\nUntactful(franciska)\n\nforall x (Respective(x) and Sore(x) -> Untactful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Eadie is sent. Lewis is sent. Malynda is succinic. Kaleb is unsaid. White, unsaid things are sent. If something is unsaid then it is piggish. All sent things are succinic. Eadie is not piggish.", "logic": "\nSent(eadie)\nSent(lewis)\nSuccinic(malynda)\nUnsaid(kaleb)\nforall x (Piggish(x) and Unsaid(x) -> Sent(x))\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Piggish(x))\nforall x (Sent(x) -> Succinic(x))\n\nnot Piggish(eadie)\n\nforall x (Unsaid(x) -> Piggish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Cyrille is coral. Jonathan is coral. Janey is falling. Sully is insincere. White, insincere things are coral. If something is insincere then it is touching. All coral things are falling. Janey is touching.", "logic": "\nCoral(cyrille)\nCoral(jonathan)\nFalling(janey)\nInsincere(sully)\nforall x (Touching(x) and Insincere(x) -> Coral(x))\nforall x (Insincere(x) -> Touching(x))\nforall x (Coral(x) -> Falling(x))\n\nTouching(janey)\n\nforall x (Insincere(x) -> Touching(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Kory is cupular. Queada is cupular. Stefan is irrational. Julia is deaf. White, deaf things are cupular. If something is deaf then it is obligate. All cupular things are irrational. Kory is not smart.", "logic": "\nCupular(kory)\nCupular(queada)\nIrrational(stefan)\nDeaf(julia)\nforall x (Obligate(x) and Deaf(x) -> Cupular(x))\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Obligate(x))\nforall x (Cupular(x) -> Irrational(x))\n\nnot Smart(kory)\n\nnot Smart(kory) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Dennie is sketchy. Phedra is sketchy. Elsinore is vapourous. Pooh is unpointed. White, unpointed things are sketchy. If something is unpointed then it is prophetic. All sketchy things are vapourous. Dennie is unpointed.", "logic": "\nSketchy(dennie)\nSketchy(phedra)\nVapourous(elsinore)\nUnpointed(pooh)\nforall x (Prophetic(x) and Unpointed(x) -> Sketchy(x))\nforall x (Unpointed(x) -> Prophetic(x))\nforall x (Sketchy(x) -> Vapourous(x))\n\nUnpointed(dennie)\n\nUnpointed(dennie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Braden is unpunished. Phedra is unpunished. Tabina is popliteal. Estell is unnamed. White, unnamed things are unpunished. If something is unnamed then it is seventeen. All unpunished things are popliteal. Estell is not smart.", "logic": "\nUnpunished(braden)\nUnpunished(phedra)\nPopliteal(tabina)\nUnnamed(estell)\nforall x (Seventeen(x) and Unnamed(x) -> Unpunished(x))\nforall x (Unnamed(x) -> Seventeen(x))\nforall x (Unpunished(x) -> Popliteal(x))\n\nnot Smart(estell)\n\nnot Smart(estell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Grant is midi. Ram is midi. Kat is kinglike. Antonia is cathectic. White, cathectic things are midi. If something is cathectic then it is acquired. All midi things are kinglike. Kat is young.", "logic": "\nMidi(grant)\nMidi(ram)\nKinglike(kat)\nCathectic(antonia)\nforall x (Acquired(x) and Cathectic(x) -> Midi(x))\nforall x (Cathectic(x) -> Acquired(x))\nforall x (Midi(x) -> Kinglike(x))\n\nYoung(kat)\n\nYoung(kat) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-321"} {"premises": "Monroe is not outcast. Rhett is not descendent. Darell is motorial. Anabelle is arawakan. If someone is motorial then they are not outcast. If someone is arawakan then they are not outcast. Blue people are arawakan. If someone is fugly then they are bearded. Kind people are motorial. All descendent, motorial people are not singular. If Anabelle is motorial then Anabelle is fugly. If Monroe is motorial and Monroe is not arawakan then Monroe is bearded. Monroe is not outcast.", "logic": "\nnot Outcast(monroe)\nnot Descendent(rhett)\nMotorial(darell)\nArawakan(anabelle)\nforall x (Motorial(x) -> not Outcast(x))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) -> not Outcast(x))\nforall x (Outcast(x) -> Arawakan(x))\nforall x (Fugly(x) -> Bearded(x))\nforall x (Arawakan(x) -> Motorial(x))\nforall x (Descendent(x) and Motorial(x) -> not Singular(x))\nMotorial(anabelle) -> Fugly(anabelle)\nMotorial(monroe) and not Arawakan(monroe) -> Bearded(monroe)\n\nnot Outcast(monroe)\n\ntherefore not Outcast(monroe)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Jennette is not costly. Petunia is not soapy. Ilyssa is malignant. Kira is afflicted. If someone is malignant then they are not costly. If someone is afflicted then they are not costly. Blue people are afflicted. If someone is flawed then they are fetal. Kind people are malignant. All soapy, malignant people are not bulbous. If Kira is malignant then Kira is flawed. If Jennette is malignant and Jennette is not afflicted then Jennette is fetal. Petunia is soapy.", "logic": "\nnot Costly(jennette)\nnot Soapy(petunia)\nMalignant(ilyssa)\nAfflicted(kira)\nforall x (Malignant(x) -> not Costly(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> not Costly(x))\nforall x (Costly(x) -> Afflicted(x))\nforall x (Flawed(x) -> Fetal(x))\nforall x (Afflicted(x) -> Malignant(x))\nforall x (Soapy(x) and Malignant(x) -> not Bulbous(x))\nMalignant(kira) -> Flawed(kira)\nMalignant(jennette) and not Afflicted(jennette) -> Fetal(jennette)\n\nSoapy(petunia)\n\ntherefore not Soapy(petunia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Niall is not oncologic. Frances is not statuesque. Madel is premarital. Nil is pithy. If someone is premarital then they are not oncologic. If someone is pithy then they are not oncologic. Blue people are pithy. If someone is dolomitic then they are unawed. Kind people are premarital. All statuesque, premarital people are not satiate. If Nil is premarital then Nil is dolomitic. If Niall is premarital and Niall is not pithy then Niall is unawed. Nil is not oncologic.", "logic": "\nnot Oncologic(niall)\nnot Statuesque(frances)\nPremarital(madel)\nPithy(nil)\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> not Oncologic(x))\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> not Oncologic(x))\nforall x (Oncologic(x) -> Pithy(x))\nforall x (Dolomitic(x) -> Unawed(x))\nforall x (Pithy(x) -> Premarital(x))\nforall x (Statuesque(x) and Premarital(x) -> not Satiate(x))\nPremarital(nil) -> Dolomitic(nil)\nPremarital(niall) and not Pithy(niall) -> Unawed(niall)\n\nnot Oncologic(nil)\n\nPithy(nil) and forall x (Pithy(x) -> not Oncologic(x)) -> therefore not Oncologic(nil)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Rebekkah is not pudgy. Hollie is not tasmanian. Mayda is colonized. Obadias is laboured. If someone is colonized then they are not pudgy. If someone is laboured then they are not pudgy. Blue people are laboured. If someone is alienating then they are moderne. Kind people are colonized. All tasmanian, colonized people are not incumbent. If Obadias is colonized then Obadias is alienating. If Rebekkah is colonized and Rebekkah is not laboured then Rebekkah is moderne. Obadias is not colonized.", "logic": "\nnot Pudgy(rebekkah)\nnot Tasmanian(hollie)\nColonized(mayda)\nLaboured(obadias)\nforall x (Colonized(x) -> not Pudgy(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> not Pudgy(x))\nforall x (Pudgy(x) -> Laboured(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) -> Moderne(x))\nforall x (Laboured(x) -> Colonized(x))\nforall x (Tasmanian(x) and Colonized(x) -> not Incumbent(x))\nColonized(obadias) -> Alienating(obadias)\nColonized(rebekkah) and not Laboured(rebekkah) -> Moderne(rebekkah)\n\nnot Colonized(obadias)\n\nLaboured(obadias) and forall x (Laboured(x) -> Colonized(x)) -> therefore Colonized(obadias)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Nadine is not unopened. Ramona is not reachable. Edin is proscribed. Wylma is fuggy. If someone is proscribed then they are not unopened. If someone is fuggy then they are not unopened. Blue people are fuggy. If someone is clerical then they are digital. Kind people are proscribed. All reachable, proscribed people are not pilar. If Wylma is proscribed then Wylma is clerical. If Nadine is proscribed and Nadine is not fuggy then Nadine is digital. Wylma is clerical.", "logic": "\nnot Unopened(nadine)\nnot Reachable(ramona)\nProscribed(edin)\nFuggy(wylma)\nforall x (Proscribed(x) -> not Unopened(x))\nforall x (Fuggy(x) -> not Unopened(x))\nforall x (Unopened(x) -> Fuggy(x))\nforall x (Clerical(x) -> Digital(x))\nforall x (Fuggy(x) -> Proscribed(x))\nforall x (Reachable(x) and Proscribed(x) -> not Pilar(x))\nProscribed(wylma) -> Clerical(wylma)\nProscribed(nadine) and not Fuggy(nadine) -> Digital(nadine)\n\nClerical(wylma)\n\nFuggy(wylma) and forall x (Fuggy(x) -> Proscribed(x)) -> therefore Proscribed(wylma) Proscribed(wylma) and Proscribed(wylma) -> Clerical(wylma) -> therefore Clerical(wylma)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Leese is not speechless. Ranna is not goaded. Reuven is tragical. Vanna is estonian. If someone is tragical then they are not speechless. If someone is estonian then they are not speechless. Blue people are estonian. If someone is validated then they are normal. Kind people are tragical. All goaded, tragical people are not nonhairy. If Vanna is tragical then Vanna is validated. If Leese is tragical and Leese is not estonian then Leese is normal. Vanna is not validated.", "logic": "\nnot Speechless(leese)\nnot Goaded(ranna)\nTragical(reuven)\nEstonian(vanna)\nforall x (Tragical(x) -> not Speechless(x))\nforall x (Estonian(x) -> not Speechless(x))\nforall x (Speechless(x) -> Estonian(x))\nforall x (Validated(x) -> Normal(x))\nforall x (Estonian(x) -> Tragical(x))\nforall x (Goaded(x) and Tragical(x) -> not Nonhairy(x))\nTragical(vanna) -> Validated(vanna)\nTragical(leese) and not Estonian(leese) -> Normal(leese)\n\nnot Validated(vanna)\n\nEstonian(vanna) and forall x (Estonian(x) -> Tragical(x)) -> therefore Tragical(vanna) Tragical(vanna) and Tragical(vanna) -> Validated(vanna) -> therefore Validated(vanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Amadeus is not syntactic. Sheffy is not gaudy. Dixie is sapid. Catherin is nubbly. If someone is sapid then they are not syntactic. If someone is nubbly then they are not syntactic. Blue people are nubbly. If someone is prolonged then they are wrinkly. Kind people are sapid. All gaudy, sapid people are not minimal. If Catherin is sapid then Catherin is prolonged. If Amadeus is sapid and Amadeus is not nubbly then Amadeus is wrinkly. Catherin is wrinkly.", "logic": "\nnot Syntactic(amadeus)\nnot Gaudy(sheffy)\nSapid(dixie)\nNubbly(catherin)\nforall x (Sapid(x) -> not Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Nubbly(x) -> not Syntactic(x))\nforall x (Syntactic(x) -> Nubbly(x))\nforall x (Prolonged(x) -> Wrinkly(x))\nforall x (Nubbly(x) -> Sapid(x))\nforall x (Gaudy(x) and Sapid(x) -> not Minimal(x))\nSapid(catherin) -> Prolonged(catherin)\nSapid(amadeus) and not Nubbly(amadeus) -> Wrinkly(amadeus)\n\nWrinkly(catherin)\n\nNubbly(catherin) and forall x (Nubbly(x) -> Sapid(x)) -> therefore Sapid(catherin) Sapid(catherin) and Sapid(catherin) -> Prolonged(catherin) -> therefore Prolonged(catherin) Prolonged(catherin) and forall x (Prolonged(x) -> Wrinkly(x)) -> therefore Wrinkly(catherin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Malcolm is not gone. Willdon is not victimised. Else is unnoticed. Silvia is debauched. If someone is unnoticed then they are not gone. If someone is debauched then they are not gone. Blue people are debauched. If someone is untipped then they are silicious. Kind people are unnoticed. All victimised, unnoticed people are not biographic. If Silvia is unnoticed then Silvia is untipped. If Malcolm is unnoticed and Malcolm is not debauched then Malcolm is silicious. Silvia is not silicious.", "logic": "\nnot Gone(malcolm)\nnot Victimised(willdon)\nUnnoticed(else)\nDebauched(silvia)\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) -> not Gone(x))\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> not Gone(x))\nforall x (Gone(x) -> Debauched(x))\nforall x (Untipped(x) -> Silicious(x))\nforall x (Debauched(x) -> Unnoticed(x))\nforall x (Victimised(x) and Unnoticed(x) -> not Biographic(x))\nUnnoticed(silvia) -> Untipped(silvia)\nUnnoticed(malcolm) and not Debauched(malcolm) -> Silicious(malcolm)\n\nnot Silicious(silvia)\n\nDebauched(silvia) and forall x (Debauched(x) -> Unnoticed(x)) -> therefore Unnoticed(silvia) Unnoticed(silvia) and Unnoticed(silvia) -> Untipped(silvia) -> therefore Untipped(silvia) Untipped(silvia) and forall x (Untipped(x) -> Silicious(x)) -> therefore Silicious(silvia)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Gino is not dicey. Tonnie is not pastoral. Malvina is piratical. Corina is airborne. If someone is piratical then they are not dicey. If someone is airborne then they are not dicey. Blue people are airborne. If someone is inexorable then they are unpaved. Kind people are piratical. All pastoral, piratical people are not legal. If Corina is piratical then Corina is inexorable. If Gino is piratical and Gino is not airborne then Gino is unpaved. Gino is not airborne.", "logic": "\nnot Dicey(gino)\nnot Pastoral(tonnie)\nPiratical(malvina)\nAirborne(corina)\nforall x (Piratical(x) -> not Dicey(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> not Dicey(x))\nforall x (Dicey(x) -> Airborne(x))\nforall x (Inexorable(x) -> Unpaved(x))\nforall x (Airborne(x) -> Piratical(x))\nforall x (Pastoral(x) and Piratical(x) -> not Legal(x))\nPiratical(corina) -> Inexorable(corina)\nPiratical(gino) and not Airborne(gino) -> Unpaved(gino)\n\nnot Airborne(gino)\n\nforall x (Dicey(x) -> Airborne(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Frederico is not undreamed. Myrtle is not rostrate. Jay is marbleised. Karlie is hypethral. If someone is marbleised then they are not undreamed. If someone is hypethral then they are not undreamed. Blue people are hypethral. If someone is genial then they are unfunded. Kind people are marbleised. All rostrate, marbleised people are not lemony. If Karlie is marbleised then Karlie is genial. If Frederico is marbleised and Frederico is not hypethral then Frederico is unfunded. Myrtle is hypethral.", "logic": "\nnot Undreamed(frederico)\nnot Rostrate(myrtle)\nMarbleised(jay)\nHypethral(karlie)\nforall x (Marbleised(x) -> not Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> not Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) -> Hypethral(x))\nforall x (Genial(x) -> Unfunded(x))\nforall x (Hypethral(x) -> Marbleised(x))\nforall x (Rostrate(x) and Marbleised(x) -> not Lemony(x))\nMarbleised(karlie) -> Genial(karlie)\nMarbleised(frederico) and not Hypethral(frederico) -> Unfunded(frederico)\n\nHypethral(myrtle)\n\nforall x (Undreamed(x) -> Hypethral(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Lianne is not recondite. Tomkin is not goddamn. Nevsa is undigested. Delilah is prideful. If someone is undigested then they are not recondite. If someone is prideful then they are not recondite. Blue people are prideful. If someone is egyptian then they are nominal. Kind people are undigested. All goddamn, undigested people are not seventieth. If Delilah is undigested then Delilah is egyptian. If Lianne is undigested and Lianne is not prideful then Lianne is nominal. Lianne is not nominal.", "logic": "\nnot Recondite(lianne)\nnot Goddamn(tomkin)\nUndigested(nevsa)\nPrideful(delilah)\nforall x (Undigested(x) -> not Recondite(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) -> not Recondite(x))\nforall x (Recondite(x) -> Prideful(x))\nforall x (Egyptian(x) -> Nominal(x))\nforall x (Prideful(x) -> Undigested(x))\nforall x (Goddamn(x) and Undigested(x) -> not Seventieth(x))\nUndigested(delilah) -> Egyptian(delilah)\nUndigested(lianne) and not Prideful(lianne) -> Nominal(lianne)\n\nnot Nominal(lianne)\n\nforall x (Egyptian(x) -> Nominal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Sherwin is not religious. Nananne is not beseeching. Dulciana is patronized. Burke is cosher. If someone is patronized then they are not religious. If someone is cosher then they are not religious. Blue people are cosher. If someone is midi then they are nurtural. Kind people are patronized. All beseeching, patronized people are not splanchnic. If Burke is patronized then Burke is midi. If Sherwin is patronized and Sherwin is not cosher then Sherwin is nurtural. Dulciana is nurtural.", "logic": "\nnot Religious(sherwin)\nnot Beseeching(nananne)\nPatronized(dulciana)\nCosher(burke)\nforall x (Patronized(x) -> not Religious(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> not Religious(x))\nforall x (Religious(x) -> Cosher(x))\nforall x (Midi(x) -> Nurtural(x))\nforall x (Cosher(x) -> Patronized(x))\nforall x (Beseeching(x) and Patronized(x) -> not Splanchnic(x))\nPatronized(burke) -> Midi(burke)\nPatronized(sherwin) and not Cosher(sherwin) -> Nurtural(sherwin)\n\nNurtural(dulciana)\n\nforall x (Midi(x) -> Nurtural(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Secunda is not scurfy. Willamina is not forged. Levi is gangly. Prince is paternal. If someone is gangly then they are not scurfy. If someone is paternal then they are not scurfy. Blue people are paternal. If someone is oscitant then they are wary. Kind people are gangly. All forged, gangly people are not climactic. If Prince is gangly then Prince is oscitant. If Secunda is gangly and Secunda is not paternal then Secunda is wary. Levi is not oscitant.", "logic": "\nnot Scurfy(secunda)\nnot Forged(willamina)\nGangly(levi)\nPaternal(prince)\nforall x (Gangly(x) -> not Scurfy(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> not Scurfy(x))\nforall x (Scurfy(x) -> Paternal(x))\nforall x (Oscitant(x) -> Wary(x))\nforall x (Paternal(x) -> Gangly(x))\nforall x (Forged(x) and Gangly(x) -> not Climactic(x))\nGangly(prince) -> Oscitant(prince)\nGangly(secunda) and not Paternal(secunda) -> Wary(secunda)\n\nnot Oscitant(levi)\n\nnot Oscitant(levi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Karol is not micro. August is not lobar. Briny is cathedral. Carmelle is mourning. If someone is cathedral then they are not micro. If someone is mourning then they are not micro. Blue people are mourning. If someone is draconian then they are bahamian. Kind people are cathedral. All lobar, cathedral people are not hypodermic. If Carmelle is cathedral then Carmelle is draconian. If Karol is cathedral and Karol is not mourning then Karol is bahamian. Carmelle is lobar.", "logic": "\nnot Micro(karol)\nnot Lobar(august)\nCathedral(briny)\nMourning(carmelle)\nforall x (Cathedral(x) -> not Micro(x))\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> not Micro(x))\nforall x (Micro(x) -> Mourning(x))\nforall x (Draconian(x) -> Bahamian(x))\nforall x (Mourning(x) -> Cathedral(x))\nforall x (Lobar(x) and Cathedral(x) -> not Hypodermic(x))\nCathedral(carmelle) -> Draconian(carmelle)\nCathedral(karol) and not Mourning(karol) -> Bahamian(karol)\n\nLobar(carmelle)\n\nLobar(carmelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Rolland is not aboriginal. Martyn is not masterful. Barri is robustious. Joanie is noticed. If someone is robustious then they are not aboriginal. If someone is noticed then they are not aboriginal. Blue people are noticed. If someone is autonomic then they are bustling. Kind people are robustious. All masterful, robustious people are not unfading. If Joanie is robustious then Joanie is autonomic. If Rolland is robustious and Rolland is not noticed then Rolland is bustling. Martyn is not autonomic.", "logic": "\nnot Aboriginal(rolland)\nnot Masterful(martyn)\nRobustious(barri)\nNoticed(joanie)\nforall x (Robustious(x) -> not Aboriginal(x))\nforall x (Noticed(x) -> not Aboriginal(x))\nforall x (Aboriginal(x) -> Noticed(x))\nforall x (Autonomic(x) -> Bustling(x))\nforall x (Noticed(x) -> Robustious(x))\nforall x (Masterful(x) and Robustious(x) -> not Unfading(x))\nRobustious(joanie) -> Autonomic(joanie)\nRobustious(rolland) and not Noticed(rolland) -> Bustling(rolland)\n\nnot Autonomic(martyn)\n\nnot Autonomic(martyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Enoch is not cocksure. Jackson is not shagged. Silvester is unattached. Orelee is necessary. If someone is unattached then they are not cocksure. If someone is necessary then they are not cocksure. Blue people are necessary. If someone is phenotypic then they are abactinal. Kind people are unattached. All shagged, unattached people are not minimalist. If Orelee is unattached then Orelee is phenotypic. If Enoch is unattached and Enoch is not necessary then Enoch is abactinal. Silvester is minimalist.", "logic": "\nnot Cocksure(enoch)\nnot Shagged(jackson)\nUnattached(silvester)\nNecessary(orelee)\nforall x (Unattached(x) -> not Cocksure(x))\nforall x (Necessary(x) -> not Cocksure(x))\nforall x (Cocksure(x) -> Necessary(x))\nforall x (Phenotypic(x) -> Abactinal(x))\nforall x (Necessary(x) -> Unattached(x))\nforall x (Shagged(x) and Unattached(x) -> not Minimalist(x))\nUnattached(orelee) -> Phenotypic(orelee)\nUnattached(enoch) and not Necessary(enoch) -> Abactinal(enoch)\n\nMinimalist(silvester)\n\nMinimalist(silvester) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-266"} {"premises": "Wandie is thai. Wandie is absorbing. Wandie is atheistic. Wandie is imported. Wandie is tubby. Wandie is not refractile. Wandie is catabatic. Myrta is thai. Myrta is atheistic. Myrta is imported. Myrta is tubby. Myrta is catabatic. If something is thai and absorbing then it is tubby. All catabatic things are not refractile. If something is atheistic then it is catabatic. If Wandie is not imported then Wandie is not thai. If Wandie is imported then Wandie is absorbing. All refractile, catabatic things are absorbing. If something is imported then it is absorbing. If something is refractile then it is atheistic. Myrta is atheistic.", "logic": "\nThai(wandie)\nAbsorbing(wandie)\nAtheistic(wandie)\nImported(wandie)\nTubby(wandie)\nnot Refractile(wandie)\nCatabatic(wandie)\nThai(myrta)\nAtheistic(myrta)\nImported(myrta)\nTubby(myrta)\nCatabatic(myrta)\nforall x (Thai(x) and Absorbing(x) -> Tubby(x))\nforall x (Catabatic(x) -> not Refractile(x))\nforall x (Atheistic(x) -> Catabatic(x))\nnot Imported(wandie) -> not Thai(wandie)\nImported(wandie) -> Absorbing(wandie)\nforall x (Refractile(x) and Catabatic(x) -> Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Imported(x) -> Absorbing(x))\nforall x (Refractile(x) -> Atheistic(x))\n\nAtheistic(myrta)\n\ntherefore Atheistic(myrta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1756"} {"premises": "Clerissa is vapourised. Clerissa is pedantic. Clerissa is airworthy. Clerissa is deafening. Clerissa is swazi. Clerissa is not flavorous. Clerissa is assorted. Madelin is vapourised. Madelin is airworthy. Madelin is deafening. Madelin is swazi. Madelin is assorted. If something is vapourised and pedantic then it is swazi. All assorted things are not flavorous. If something is airworthy then it is assorted. If Clerissa is not deafening then Clerissa is not vapourised. If Clerissa is deafening then Clerissa is pedantic. All flavorous, assorted things are pedantic. If something is deafening then it is pedantic. If something is flavorous then it is airworthy. Clerissa is flavorous.", "logic": "\nVapourised(clerissa)\nPedantic(clerissa)\nAirworthy(clerissa)\nDeafening(clerissa)\nSwazi(clerissa)\nnot Flavorous(clerissa)\nAssorted(clerissa)\nVapourised(madelin)\nAirworthy(madelin)\nDeafening(madelin)\nSwazi(madelin)\nAssorted(madelin)\nforall x (Vapourised(x) and Pedantic(x) -> Swazi(x))\nforall x (Assorted(x) -> not Flavorous(x))\nforall x (Airworthy(x) -> Assorted(x))\nnot Deafening(clerissa) -> not Vapourised(clerissa)\nDeafening(clerissa) -> Pedantic(clerissa)\nforall x (Flavorous(x) and Assorted(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Deafening(x) -> Pedantic(x))\nforall x (Flavorous(x) -> Airworthy(x))\n\nFlavorous(clerissa)\n\ntherefore not Flavorous(clerissa)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1756"} {"premises": "Lorry is antidotal. Lorry is disorderly. Lorry is archetypal. Lorry is spastic. Lorry is autoimmune. Lorry is not pimply. Lorry is namibian. Melody is antidotal. Melody is archetypal. Melody is spastic. Melody is autoimmune. Melody is namibian. If something is antidotal and disorderly then it is autoimmune. All namibian things are not pimply. If something is archetypal then it is namibian. If Lorry is not spastic then Lorry is not antidotal. If Lorry is spastic then Lorry is disorderly. All pimply, namibian things are disorderly. If something is spastic then it is disorderly. If something is pimply then it is archetypal. Melody is disorderly.", "logic": "\nAntidotal(lorry)\nDisorderly(lorry)\nArchetypal(lorry)\nSpastic(lorry)\nAutoimmune(lorry)\nnot Pimply(lorry)\nNamibian(lorry)\nAntidotal(melody)\nArchetypal(melody)\nSpastic(melody)\nAutoimmune(melody)\nNamibian(melody)\nforall x (Antidotal(x) and Disorderly(x) -> Autoimmune(x))\nforall x (Namibian(x) -> not Pimply(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) -> Namibian(x))\nnot Spastic(lorry) -> not Antidotal(lorry)\nSpastic(lorry) -> Disorderly(lorry)\nforall x (Pimply(x) and Namibian(x) -> Disorderly(x))\nforall x (Spastic(x) -> Disorderly(x))\nforall x (Pimply(x) -> Archetypal(x))\n\nDisorderly(melody)\n\nSpastic(melody) and forall x (Spastic(x) -> Disorderly(x)) -> therefore Disorderly(melody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1756"} {"premises": "Annabell is enlarged. Annabell is consummate. Annabell is inviolate. Annabell is beetling. Annabell is barebacked. Annabell is not mannerly. Annabell is quelled. Noami is enlarged. Noami is inviolate. Noami is beetling. Noami is barebacked. Noami is quelled. If something is enlarged and consummate then it is barebacked. All quelled things are not mannerly. If something is inviolate then it is quelled. If Annabell is not beetling then Annabell is not enlarged. If Annabell is beetling then Annabell is consummate. All mannerly, quelled things are consummate. If something is beetling then it is consummate. If something is mannerly then it is inviolate. Noami is mannerly.", "logic": "\nEnlarged(annabell)\nConsummate(annabell)\nInviolate(annabell)\nBeetling(annabell)\nBarebacked(annabell)\nnot Mannerly(annabell)\nQuelled(annabell)\nEnlarged(noami)\nInviolate(noami)\nBeetling(noami)\nBarebacked(noami)\nQuelled(noami)\nforall x (Enlarged(x) and Consummate(x) -> Barebacked(x))\nforall x (Quelled(x) -> not Mannerly(x))\nforall x (Inviolate(x) -> Quelled(x))\nnot Beetling(annabell) -> not Enlarged(annabell)\nBeetling(annabell) -> Consummate(annabell)\nforall x (Mannerly(x) and Quelled(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Beetling(x) -> Consummate(x))\nforall x (Mannerly(x) -> Inviolate(x))\n\nMannerly(noami)\n\nQuelled(noami) and forall x (Quelled(x) -> not Mannerly(x)) -> therefore not Mannerly(noami)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D1-1756"} {"premises": "The johny publicise the alphonso. The johny telecast the alphonso. The johny is picaresque. The johny is finicky. The johny is preachy. The johny is swedish. The johny troll the alphonso. The alphonso publicise the johny. The alphonso telecast the johny. The alphonso is picaresque. The alphonso is finicky. The alphonso is preachy. The alphonso is outgoing. The alphonso is swedish. The alphonso troll the johny. If something is finicky and outgoing then it troll the johny. If something publicise the johny and the johny troll the alphonso then the johny is outgoing. The alphonso is swedish.", "logic": "\nPublicise(johny, alphonso)\nTelecast(johny, alphonso)\nPicaresque(johny)\nFinicky(johny)\nPreachy(johny)\nSwedish(johny)\nTroll(johny, alphonso)\nPublicise(alphonso, johny)\nTelecast(alphonso, johny)\nPicaresque(alphonso)\nFinicky(alphonso)\nPreachy(alphonso)\nOutgoing(alphonso)\nSwedish(alphonso)\nTroll(alphonso, johny)\nforall x (Finicky(x) and Outgoing(x) -> Troll(x, johny))\nforall x (Publicise(x, johny) and Troll(johny, alphonso) -> Outgoing(johny))\n\nSwedish(alphonso)\n\ntherefore Swedish(alphonso)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The poppy intubate the sol. The poppy grip the sol. The poppy is terrible. The poppy is allelic. The poppy is czech. The poppy is cyclic. The poppy prim the sol. The sol intubate the poppy. The sol grip the poppy. The sol is terrible. The sol is allelic. The sol is czech. The sol is idealistic. The sol is cyclic. The sol prim the poppy. If something is allelic and idealistic then it prim the poppy. If something intubate the poppy and the poppy prim the sol then the poppy is idealistic. The sol is not terrible.", "logic": "\nIntubate(poppy, sol)\nGrip(poppy, sol)\nTerrible(poppy)\nAllelic(poppy)\nCzech(poppy)\nCyclic(poppy)\nPrim(poppy, sol)\nIntubate(sol, poppy)\nGrip(sol, poppy)\nTerrible(sol)\nAllelic(sol)\nCzech(sol)\nIdealistic(sol)\nCyclic(sol)\nPrim(sol, poppy)\nforall x (Allelic(x) and Idealistic(x) -> Prim(x, poppy))\nforall x (Intubate(x, poppy) and Prim(poppy, sol) -> Idealistic(poppy))\n\nnot Terrible(sol)\n\ntherefore Terrible(sol)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The sherman ptyalise the art. The sherman remediate the art. The sherman is hazy. The sherman is tuneless. The sherman is arctic. The sherman is paraguayan. The sherman keen the art. The art ptyalise the sherman. The art remediate the sherman. The art is hazy. The art is tuneless. The art is arctic. The art is nativistic. The art is paraguayan. The art keen the sherman. If something is tuneless and nativistic then it keen the sherman. If something ptyalise the sherman and the sherman keen the art then the sherman is nativistic. The sherman is nativistic.", "logic": "\nPtyalise(sherman, art)\nRemediate(sherman, art)\nHazy(sherman)\nTuneless(sherman)\nArctic(sherman)\nParaguayan(sherman)\nKeen(sherman, art)\nPtyalise(art, sherman)\nRemediate(art, sherman)\nHazy(art)\nTuneless(art)\nArctic(art)\nNativistic(art)\nParaguayan(art)\nKeen(art, sherman)\nforall x (Tuneless(x) and Nativistic(x) -> Keen(x, sherman))\nforall x (Ptyalise(x, sherman) and Keen(sherman, art) -> Nativistic(sherman))\n\nNativistic(sherman)\n\nPtyalise(art, sherman) and Keen(sherman, art) and forall x (Ptyalise(x, sherman) and Keen(sherman, art) -> Nativistic(sherman)) -> therefore Nativistic(sherman)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The ulises clack the cara. The ulises chaffer the cara. The ulises is unpriestly. The ulises is brummagem. The ulises is schismatic. The ulises is islamic. The ulises action the cara. The cara clack the ulises. The cara chaffer the ulises. The cara is unpriestly. The cara is brummagem. The cara is schismatic. The cara is impious. The cara is islamic. The cara action the ulises. If something is brummagem and impious then it action the ulises. If something clack the ulises and the ulises action the cara then the ulises is impious. The ulises is not impious.", "logic": "\nClack(ulises, cara)\nChaffer(ulises, cara)\nUnpriestly(ulises)\nBrummagem(ulises)\nSchismatic(ulises)\nIslamic(ulises)\nAction(ulises, cara)\nClack(cara, ulises)\nChaffer(cara, ulises)\nUnpriestly(cara)\nBrummagem(cara)\nSchismatic(cara)\nImpious(cara)\nIslamic(cara)\nAction(cara, ulises)\nforall x (Brummagem(x) and Impious(x) -> Action(x, ulises))\nforall x (Clack(x, ulises) and Action(ulises, cara) -> Impious(ulises))\n\nnot Impious(ulises)\n\nClack(cara, ulises) and Action(ulises, cara) and forall x (Clack(x, ulises) and Action(ulises, cara) -> Impious(ulises)) -> therefore Impious(ulises)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The darcie interdict the braden. The darcie remainder the braden. The darcie is owing. The darcie is endoergic. The darcie is combustive. The darcie is stony. The darcie rubberise the braden. The braden interdict the darcie. The braden remainder the darcie. The braden is owing. The braden is endoergic. The braden is combustive. The braden is logical. The braden is stony. The braden rubberise the darcie. If something is endoergic and logical then it rubberise the darcie. If something interdict the darcie and the darcie rubberise the braden then the darcie is logical. The darcie rubberise the darcie.", "logic": "\nInterdict(darcie, braden)\nRemainder(darcie, braden)\nOwing(darcie)\nEndoergic(darcie)\nCombustive(darcie)\nStony(darcie)\nRubberise(darcie, braden)\nInterdict(braden, darcie)\nRemainder(braden, darcie)\nOwing(braden)\nEndoergic(braden)\nCombustive(braden)\nLogical(braden)\nStony(braden)\nRubberise(braden, darcie)\nforall x (Endoergic(x) and Logical(x) -> Rubberise(x, darcie))\nforall x (Interdict(x, darcie) and Rubberise(darcie, braden) -> Logical(darcie))\n\nRubberise(darcie, darcie)\n\nInterdict(braden, darcie) and Rubberise(darcie, braden) and forall x (Interdict(x, darcie) and Rubberise(darcie, braden) -> Logical(darcie)) -> therefore Logical(darcie) Endoergic(darcie) and Logical(darcie) and forall x (Endoergic(x) and Logical(x) -> Rubberise(x, darcie)) -> therefore Rubberise(darcie, darcie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The zebadiah help the brittany. The zebadiah jade the brittany. The zebadiah is free. The zebadiah is cyclonical. The zebadiah is geological. The zebadiah is undersized. The zebadiah skimp the brittany. The brittany help the zebadiah. The brittany jade the zebadiah. The brittany is free. The brittany is cyclonical. The brittany is geological. The brittany is smothering. The brittany is undersized. The brittany skimp the zebadiah. If something is cyclonical and smothering then it skimp the zebadiah. If something help the zebadiah and the zebadiah skimp the brittany then the zebadiah is smothering. The zebadiah does not like the zebadiah.", "logic": "\nHelp(zebadiah, brittany)\nJade(zebadiah, brittany)\nFree(zebadiah)\nCyclonical(zebadiah)\nGeological(zebadiah)\nUndersized(zebadiah)\nSkimp(zebadiah, brittany)\nHelp(brittany, zebadiah)\nJade(brittany, zebadiah)\nFree(brittany)\nCyclonical(brittany)\nGeological(brittany)\nSmothering(brittany)\nUndersized(brittany)\nSkimp(brittany, zebadiah)\nforall x (Cyclonical(x) and Smothering(x) -> Skimp(x, zebadiah))\nforall x (Help(x, zebadiah) and Skimp(zebadiah, brittany) -> Smothering(zebadiah))\n\nnot Skimp(zebadiah, zebadiah)\n\nHelp(brittany, zebadiah) and Skimp(zebadiah, brittany) and forall x (Help(x, zebadiah) and Skimp(zebadiah, brittany) -> Smothering(zebadiah)) -> therefore Smothering(zebadiah) Cyclonical(zebadiah) and Smothering(zebadiah) and forall x (Cyclonical(x) and Smothering(x) -> Skimp(x, zebadiah)) -> therefore Skimp(zebadiah, zebadiah)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The roxie traipse the tremaine. The roxie shimmer the tremaine. The roxie is riming. The roxie is pakistani. The roxie is afghan. The roxie is smoky. The roxie taboo the tremaine. The tremaine traipse the roxie. The tremaine shimmer the roxie. The tremaine is riming. The tremaine is pakistani. The tremaine is afghan. The tremaine is reverent. The tremaine is smoky. The tremaine taboo the roxie. If something is pakistani and reverent then it taboo the roxie. If something traipse the roxie and the roxie taboo the tremaine then the roxie is reverent. The tremaine does not eat the tremaine.", "logic": "\nTraipse(roxie, tremaine)\nShimmer(roxie, tremaine)\nRiming(roxie)\nPakistani(roxie)\nAfghan(roxie)\nSmoky(roxie)\nTaboo(roxie, tremaine)\nTraipse(tremaine, roxie)\nShimmer(tremaine, roxie)\nRiming(tremaine)\nPakistani(tremaine)\nAfghan(tremaine)\nReverent(tremaine)\nSmoky(tremaine)\nTaboo(tremaine, roxie)\nforall x (Pakistani(x) and Reverent(x) -> Taboo(x, roxie))\nforall x (Traipse(x, roxie) and Taboo(roxie, tremaine) -> Reverent(roxie))\n\nnot Shimmer(tremaine, tremaine)\n\nnot Shimmer(tremaine, tremaine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The dita crest the menard. The dita unbrace the menard. The dita is peevish. The dita is plodding. The dita is unannealed. The dita is chief. The dita furrow the menard. The menard crest the dita. The menard unbrace the dita. The menard is peevish. The menard is plodding. The menard is unannealed. The menard is corrupting. The menard is chief. The menard furrow the dita. If something is plodding and corrupting then it furrow the dita. If something crest the dita and the dita furrow the menard then the dita is corrupting. The dita unbrace the dita.", "logic": "\nCrest(dita, menard)\nUnbrace(dita, menard)\nPeevish(dita)\nPlodding(dita)\nUnannealed(dita)\nChief(dita)\nFurrow(dita, menard)\nCrest(menard, dita)\nUnbrace(menard, dita)\nPeevish(menard)\nPlodding(menard)\nUnannealed(menard)\nCorrupting(menard)\nChief(menard)\nFurrow(menard, dita)\nforall x (Plodding(x) and Corrupting(x) -> Furrow(x, dita))\nforall x (Crest(x, dita) and Furrow(dita, menard) -> Corrupting(dita))\n\nUnbrace(dita, dita)\n\nUnbrace(dita, dita) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The amandie unchain the charlot. The amandie vandalise the charlot. The amandie is anginose. The amandie is isomorphic. The amandie is cesarean. The amandie is isogonic. The amandie skirt the charlot. The charlot unchain the amandie. The charlot vandalise the amandie. The charlot is anginose. The charlot is isomorphic. The charlot is cesarean. The charlot is pensive. The charlot is isogonic. The charlot skirt the amandie. If something is isomorphic and pensive then it skirt the amandie. If something unchain the amandie and the amandie skirt the charlot then the amandie is pensive. The charlot does not like the charlot.", "logic": "\nUnchain(amandie, charlot)\nVandalise(amandie, charlot)\nAnginose(amandie)\nIsomorphic(amandie)\nCesarean(amandie)\nIsogonic(amandie)\nSkirt(amandie, charlot)\nUnchain(charlot, amandie)\nVandalise(charlot, amandie)\nAnginose(charlot)\nIsomorphic(charlot)\nCesarean(charlot)\nPensive(charlot)\nIsogonic(charlot)\nSkirt(charlot, amandie)\nforall x (Isomorphic(x) and Pensive(x) -> Skirt(x, amandie))\nforall x (Unchain(x, amandie) and Skirt(amandie, charlot) -> Pensive(amandie))\n\nnot Skirt(charlot, charlot)\n\nnot Skirt(charlot, charlot) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "The korry waddle the estella. The korry invaginate the estella. The korry is diagnostic. The korry is conceited. The korry is rubbery. The korry is epidemic. The korry unmask the estella. The estella waddle the korry. The estella invaginate the korry. The estella is diagnostic. The estella is conceited. The estella is rubbery. The estella is unentitled. The estella is epidemic. The estella unmask the korry. If something is conceited and unentitled then it unmask the korry. If something waddle the korry and the korry unmask the estella then the korry is unentitled. The estella waddle the estella.", "logic": "\nWaddle(korry, estella)\nInvaginate(korry, estella)\nDiagnostic(korry)\nConceited(korry)\nRubbery(korry)\nEpidemic(korry)\nUnmask(korry, estella)\nWaddle(estella, korry)\nInvaginate(estella, korry)\nDiagnostic(estella)\nConceited(estella)\nRubbery(estella)\nUnentitled(estella)\nEpidemic(estella)\nUnmask(estella, korry)\nforall x (Conceited(x) and Unentitled(x) -> Unmask(x, korry))\nforall x (Waddle(x, korry) and Unmask(korry, estella) -> Unentitled(korry))\n\nWaddle(estella, estella)\n\nWaddle(estella, estella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-195"} {"premises": "Chaddie is pyrectic. Aldwin is benthal. Carree is laciniate. If someone is poorly then they are not benthal. If someone is laciniate and frangible then they are pyrectic. If someone is pyrectic then they are laciniate. Furry people are not laciniate. Blue people are poorly. If someone is acold and not frangible then they are poorly. All acold, frangible people are not poorly. If someone is pyrectic and not poorly then they are not audile. Aldwin is benthal.", "logic": "\nPyrectic(chaddie)\nBenthal(aldwin)\nLaciniate(carree)\nforall x (Poorly(x) -> not Benthal(x))\nforall x (Laciniate(x) and Frangible(x) -> Pyrectic(x))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) -> Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Frangible(x) -> not Laciniate(x))\nforall x (Laciniate(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) and not Frangible(x) -> Poorly(x))\nforall x (Acold(x) and Frangible(x) -> not Poorly(x))\nforall x (Pyrectic(x) and not Poorly(x) -> not Audile(x))\n\nBenthal(aldwin)\n\ntherefore Benthal(aldwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Kial is ruthful. Murial is appointive. Lanita is ribless. If someone is lviii then they are not appointive. If someone is ribless and pucka then they are ruthful. If someone is ruthful then they are ribless. Furry people are not ribless. Blue people are lviii. If someone is vitriolic and not pucka then they are lviii. All vitriolic, pucka people are not lviii. If someone is ruthful and not lviii then they are not crispate. Lanita is not ribless.", "logic": "\nRuthful(kial)\nAppointive(murial)\nRibless(lanita)\nforall x (Lviii(x) -> not Appointive(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) and Pucka(x) -> Ruthful(x))\nforall x (Ruthful(x) -> Ribless(x))\nforall x (Pucka(x) -> not Ribless(x))\nforall x (Ribless(x) -> Lviii(x))\nforall x (Vitriolic(x) and not Pucka(x) -> Lviii(x))\nforall x (Vitriolic(x) and Pucka(x) -> not Lviii(x))\nforall x (Ruthful(x) and not Lviii(x) -> not Crispate(x))\n\nnot Ribless(lanita)\n\ntherefore Ribless(lanita)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Nickie is bumptious. Verney is bleak. Cecilia is polyhedral. If someone is multiplex then they are not bleak. If someone is polyhedral and pulseless then they are bumptious. If someone is bumptious then they are polyhedral. Furry people are not polyhedral. Blue people are multiplex. If someone is picayune and not pulseless then they are multiplex. All picayune, pulseless people are not multiplex. If someone is bumptious and not multiplex then they are not located. Cecilia is multiplex.", "logic": "\nBumptious(nickie)\nBleak(verney)\nPolyhedral(cecilia)\nforall x (Multiplex(x) -> not Bleak(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) and Pulseless(x) -> Bumptious(x))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) -> Polyhedral(x))\nforall x (Pulseless(x) -> not Polyhedral(x))\nforall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Multiplex(x))\nforall x (Picayune(x) and not Pulseless(x) -> Multiplex(x))\nforall x (Picayune(x) and Pulseless(x) -> not Multiplex(x))\nforall x (Bumptious(x) and not Multiplex(x) -> not Located(x))\n\nMultiplex(cecilia)\n\nPolyhedral(cecilia) and forall x (Polyhedral(x) -> Multiplex(x)) -> therefore Multiplex(cecilia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Pepe is skintight. Moise is allusive. Rupert is unavenged. If someone is bodied then they are not allusive. If someone is unavenged and quirky then they are skintight. If someone is skintight then they are unavenged. Furry people are not unavenged. Blue people are bodied. If someone is projected and not quirky then they are bodied. All projected, quirky people are not bodied. If someone is skintight and not bodied then they are not thieving. Pepe is not unavenged.", "logic": "\nSkintight(pepe)\nAllusive(moise)\nUnavenged(rupert)\nforall x (Bodied(x) -> not Allusive(x))\nforall x (Unavenged(x) and Quirky(x) -> Skintight(x))\nforall x (Skintight(x) -> Unavenged(x))\nforall x (Quirky(x) -> not Unavenged(x))\nforall x (Unavenged(x) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Projected(x) and not Quirky(x) -> Bodied(x))\nforall x (Projected(x) and Quirky(x) -> not Bodied(x))\nforall x (Skintight(x) and not Bodied(x) -> not Thieving(x))\n\nnot Unavenged(pepe)\n\nSkintight(pepe) and forall x (Skintight(x) -> Unavenged(x)) -> therefore Unavenged(pepe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Nev is squared. Zak is unpriestly. Vaclav is leased. If someone is assignable then they are not unpriestly. If someone is leased and dietary then they are squared. If someone is squared then they are leased. Furry people are not leased. Blue people are assignable. If someone is cloudless and not dietary then they are assignable. All cloudless, dietary people are not assignable. If someone is squared and not assignable then they are not pauline. Nev is assignable.", "logic": "\nSquared(nev)\nUnpriestly(zak)\nLeased(vaclav)\nforall x (Assignable(x) -> not Unpriestly(x))\nforall x (Leased(x) and Dietary(x) -> Squared(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) -> Leased(x))\nforall x (Dietary(x) -> not Leased(x))\nforall x (Leased(x) -> Assignable(x))\nforall x (Cloudless(x) and not Dietary(x) -> Assignable(x))\nforall x (Cloudless(x) and Dietary(x) -> not Assignable(x))\nforall x (Squared(x) and not Assignable(x) -> not Pauline(x))\n\nAssignable(nev)\n\nSquared(nev) and forall x (Squared(x) -> Leased(x)) -> therefore Leased(nev) Leased(nev) and forall x (Leased(x) -> Assignable(x)) -> therefore Assignable(nev)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Tabitha is unexcused. Lib is grayish. Nancy is superlunar. If someone is mucinoid then they are not grayish. If someone is superlunar and retrograde then they are unexcused. If someone is unexcused then they are superlunar. Furry people are not superlunar. Blue people are mucinoid. If someone is alienating and not retrograde then they are mucinoid. All alienating, retrograde people are not mucinoid. If someone is unexcused and not mucinoid then they are not boggy. Tabitha is not mucinoid.", "logic": "\nUnexcused(tabitha)\nGrayish(lib)\nSuperlunar(nancy)\nforall x (Mucinoid(x) -> not Grayish(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) and Retrograde(x) -> Unexcused(x))\nforall x (Unexcused(x) -> Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Retrograde(x) -> not Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) and not Retrograde(x) -> Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) and Retrograde(x) -> not Mucinoid(x))\nforall x (Unexcused(x) and not Mucinoid(x) -> not Boggy(x))\n\nnot Mucinoid(tabitha)\n\nUnexcused(tabitha) and forall x (Unexcused(x) -> Superlunar(x)) -> therefore Superlunar(tabitha) Superlunar(tabitha) and forall x (Superlunar(x) -> Mucinoid(x)) -> therefore Mucinoid(tabitha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Nert is coveted. Berny is plummy. Aharon is baptistic. If someone is colloidal then they are not plummy. If someone is baptistic and uncool then they are coveted. If someone is coveted then they are baptistic. Furry people are not baptistic. Blue people are colloidal. If someone is archetypal and not uncool then they are colloidal. All archetypal, uncool people are not colloidal. If someone is coveted and not colloidal then they are not affiliated. Nert is not plummy.", "logic": "\nCoveted(nert)\nPlummy(berny)\nBaptistic(aharon)\nforall x (Colloidal(x) -> not Plummy(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) and Uncool(x) -> Coveted(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) -> Baptistic(x))\nforall x (Uncool(x) -> not Baptistic(x))\nforall x (Baptistic(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and not Uncool(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Archetypal(x) and Uncool(x) -> not Colloidal(x))\nforall x (Coveted(x) and not Colloidal(x) -> not Affiliated(x))\n\nnot Plummy(nert)\n\nCoveted(nert) and forall x (Coveted(x) -> Baptistic(x)) -> therefore Baptistic(nert) Baptistic(nert) and forall x (Baptistic(x) -> Colloidal(x)) -> therefore Colloidal(nert) Colloidal(nert) and forall x (Colloidal(x) -> not Plummy(x)) -> therefore not Plummy(nert)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Mable is gingival. Conrad is totaled. Kiah is kuwaiti. If someone is troublous then they are not totaled. If someone is kuwaiti and envious then they are gingival. If someone is gingival then they are kuwaiti. Furry people are not kuwaiti. Blue people are troublous. If someone is warning and not envious then they are troublous. All warning, envious people are not troublous. If someone is gingival and not troublous then they are not backstage. Mable is totaled.", "logic": "\nGingival(mable)\nTotaled(conrad)\nKuwaiti(kiah)\nforall x (Troublous(x) -> not Totaled(x))\nforall x (Kuwaiti(x) and Envious(x) -> Gingival(x))\nforall x (Gingival(x) -> Kuwaiti(x))\nforall x (Envious(x) -> not Kuwaiti(x))\nforall x (Kuwaiti(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and not Envious(x) -> Troublous(x))\nforall x (Warning(x) and Envious(x) -> not Troublous(x))\nforall x (Gingival(x) and not Troublous(x) -> not Backstage(x))\n\nTotaled(mable)\n\nGingival(mable) and forall x (Gingival(x) -> Kuwaiti(x)) -> therefore Kuwaiti(mable) Kuwaiti(mable) and forall x (Kuwaiti(x) -> Troublous(x)) -> therefore Troublous(mable) Troublous(mable) and forall x (Troublous(x) -> not Totaled(x)) -> therefore not Totaled(mable)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Marlowe is skew. Anallise is annulated. Engelbart is adaptive. If someone is modernised then they are not annulated. If someone is adaptive and orchestral then they are skew. If someone is skew then they are adaptive. Furry people are not adaptive. Blue people are modernised. If someone is detected and not orchestral then they are modernised. All detected, orchestral people are not modernised. If someone is skew and not modernised then they are not retroflex. Anallise is not modernised.", "logic": "\nSkew(marlowe)\nAnnulated(anallise)\nAdaptive(engelbart)\nforall x (Modernised(x) -> not Annulated(x))\nforall x (Adaptive(x) and Orchestral(x) -> Skew(x))\nforall x (Skew(x) -> Adaptive(x))\nforall x (Orchestral(x) -> not Adaptive(x))\nforall x (Adaptive(x) -> Modernised(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) and not Orchestral(x) -> Modernised(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) and Orchestral(x) -> not Modernised(x))\nforall x (Skew(x) and not Modernised(x) -> not Retroflex(x))\n\nnot Modernised(anallise)\n\nforall x (Adaptive(x) -> Modernised(x)) <- forall x (Skew(x) -> Adaptive(x)) <- forall x (Adaptive(x) and Orchestral(x) -> Skew(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Thorn is furnished. Emmie is potholed. Nev is gentile. If someone is radiant then they are not potholed. If someone is gentile and drifting then they are furnished. If someone is furnished then they are gentile. Furry people are not gentile. Blue people are radiant. If someone is astounded and not drifting then they are radiant. All astounded, drifting people are not radiant. If someone is furnished and not radiant then they are not stimulant. Nev is furnished.", "logic": "\nFurnished(thorn)\nPotholed(emmie)\nGentile(nev)\nforall x (Radiant(x) -> not Potholed(x))\nforall x (Gentile(x) and Drifting(x) -> Furnished(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) -> Gentile(x))\nforall x (Drifting(x) -> not Gentile(x))\nforall x (Gentile(x) -> Radiant(x))\nforall x (Astounded(x) and not Drifting(x) -> Radiant(x))\nforall x (Astounded(x) and Drifting(x) -> not Radiant(x))\nforall x (Furnished(x) and not Radiant(x) -> not Stimulant(x))\n\nFurnished(nev)\n\nforall x (Gentile(x) and Drifting(x) -> Furnished(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Meyer is peaceful. Moria is leakproof. Kacey is accented. If someone is squatty then they are not leakproof. If someone is accented and siouan then they are peaceful. If someone is peaceful then they are accented. Furry people are not accented. Blue people are squatty. If someone is muddled and not siouan then they are squatty. All muddled, siouan people are not squatty. If someone is peaceful and not squatty then they are not shrewish. Moria is not peaceful.", "logic": "\nPeaceful(meyer)\nLeakproof(moria)\nAccented(kacey)\nforall x (Squatty(x) -> not Leakproof(x))\nforall x (Accented(x) and Siouan(x) -> Peaceful(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) -> Accented(x))\nforall x (Siouan(x) -> not Accented(x))\nforall x (Accented(x) -> Squatty(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) and not Siouan(x) -> Squatty(x))\nforall x (Muddled(x) and Siouan(x) -> not Squatty(x))\nforall x (Peaceful(x) and not Squatty(x) -> not Shrewish(x))\n\nnot Peaceful(moria)\n\nforall x (Accented(x) and Siouan(x) -> Peaceful(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Dorolisa is snappish. Patricia is romance. Denny is uncreative. If someone is monoclinic then they are not romance. If someone is uncreative and intrastate then they are snappish. If someone is snappish then they are uncreative. Furry people are not uncreative. Blue people are monoclinic. If someone is sericeous and not intrastate then they are monoclinic. All sericeous, intrastate people are not monoclinic. If someone is snappish and not monoclinic then they are not butcherly. Patricia is uncreative.", "logic": "\nSnappish(dorolisa)\nRomance(patricia)\nUncreative(denny)\nforall x (Monoclinic(x) -> not Romance(x))\nforall x (Uncreative(x) and Intrastate(x) -> Snappish(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Uncreative(x))\nforall x (Intrastate(x) -> not Uncreative(x))\nforall x (Uncreative(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and not Intrastate(x) -> Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Sericeous(x) and Intrastate(x) -> not Monoclinic(x))\nforall x (Snappish(x) and not Monoclinic(x) -> not Butcherly(x))\n\nUncreative(patricia)\n\nforall x (Snappish(x) -> Uncreative(x)) <- forall x (Uncreative(x) and Intrastate(x) -> Snappish(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Kathie is amusing. Randolph is doglike. Melisse is anaphasic. If someone is tapered then they are not doglike. If someone is anaphasic and myelic then they are amusing. If someone is amusing then they are anaphasic. Furry people are not anaphasic. Blue people are tapered. If someone is withering and not myelic then they are tapered. All withering, myelic people are not tapered. If someone is amusing and not tapered then they are not motley. Melisse is not myelic.", "logic": "\nAmusing(kathie)\nDoglike(randolph)\nAnaphasic(melisse)\nforall x (Tapered(x) -> not Doglike(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) and Myelic(x) -> Amusing(x))\nforall x (Amusing(x) -> Anaphasic(x))\nforall x (Myelic(x) -> not Anaphasic(x))\nforall x (Anaphasic(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Withering(x) and not Myelic(x) -> Tapered(x))\nforall x (Withering(x) and Myelic(x) -> not Tapered(x))\nforall x (Amusing(x) and not Tapered(x) -> not Motley(x))\n\nnot Myelic(melisse)\n\nnot Myelic(melisse) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Karon is accoutered. Elisabet is endogenic. Sholom is apiarian. If someone is modular then they are not endogenic. If someone is apiarian and trussed then they are accoutered. If someone is accoutered then they are apiarian. Furry people are not apiarian. Blue people are modular. If someone is hyaloid and not trussed then they are modular. All hyaloid, trussed people are not modular. If someone is accoutered and not modular then they are not shapeless. Elisabet is shapeless.", "logic": "\nAccoutered(karon)\nEndogenic(elisabet)\nApiarian(sholom)\nforall x (Modular(x) -> not Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) and Trussed(x) -> Accoutered(x))\nforall x (Accoutered(x) -> Apiarian(x))\nforall x (Trussed(x) -> not Apiarian(x))\nforall x (Apiarian(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and not Trussed(x) -> Modular(x))\nforall x (Hyaloid(x) and Trussed(x) -> not Modular(x))\nforall x (Accoutered(x) and not Modular(x) -> not Shapeless(x))\n\nShapeless(elisabet)\n\nShapeless(elisabet) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Mella is burnished. Lucia is acapnial. Juan is specked. If someone is semestrial then they are not acapnial. If someone is specked and ammonitic then they are burnished. If someone is burnished then they are specked. Furry people are not specked. Blue people are semestrial. If someone is arthritic and not ammonitic then they are semestrial. All arthritic, ammonitic people are not semestrial. If someone is burnished and not semestrial then they are not another. Juan is not another.", "logic": "\nBurnished(mella)\nAcapnial(lucia)\nSpecked(juan)\nforall x (Semestrial(x) -> not Acapnial(x))\nforall x (Specked(x) and Ammonitic(x) -> Burnished(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) -> Specked(x))\nforall x (Ammonitic(x) -> not Specked(x))\nforall x (Specked(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and not Ammonitic(x) -> Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Arthritic(x) and Ammonitic(x) -> not Semestrial(x))\nforall x (Burnished(x) and not Semestrial(x) -> not Another(x))\n\nnot Another(juan)\n\nnot Another(juan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Britt is unrelaxed. Joannes is buirdly. Kaja is nonechoic. If someone is gauzy then they are not buirdly. If someone is nonechoic and edentulate then they are unrelaxed. If someone is unrelaxed then they are nonechoic. Furry people are not nonechoic. Blue people are gauzy. If someone is giving and not edentulate then they are gauzy. All giving, edentulate people are not gauzy. If someone is unrelaxed and not gauzy then they are not neckless. Britt is edentulate.", "logic": "\nUnrelaxed(britt)\nBuirdly(joannes)\nNonechoic(kaja)\nforall x (Gauzy(x) -> not Buirdly(x))\nforall x (Nonechoic(x) and Edentulate(x) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) -> Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Edentulate(x) -> not Nonechoic(x))\nforall x (Nonechoic(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and not Edentulate(x) -> Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Giving(x) and Edentulate(x) -> not Gauzy(x))\nforall x (Unrelaxed(x) and not Gauzy(x) -> not Neckless(x))\n\nEdentulate(britt)\n\nEdentulate(britt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1022"} {"premises": "Marysa is brattish. Marysa is neuronal. Sandi is squamulose. Sandi is vexatious. Sandi is ferial. Sandi is brattish. Sandi is sixfold. Barbie is eccentric. Barbie is vexatious. Barbie is ferial. Barbie is brattish. Barbie is sixfold. White, vexatious people are neuronal. Barbie is vexatious.", "logic": "\nBrattish(marysa)\nNeuronal(marysa)\nSquamulose(sandi)\nVexatious(sandi)\nFerial(sandi)\nBrattish(sandi)\nSixfold(sandi)\nEccentric(barbie)\nVexatious(barbie)\nFerial(barbie)\nBrattish(barbie)\nSixfold(barbie)\nforall x (Sixfold(x) and Vexatious(x) -> Neuronal(x))\n\nVexatious(barbie)\n\ntherefore Vexatious(barbie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "Clio is echoless. Clio is assiduous. Tonia is devious. Tonia is chaldean. Tonia is crenate. Tonia is echoless. Tonia is abkhazian. Lurline is moveable. Lurline is chaldean. Lurline is crenate. Lurline is echoless. Lurline is abkhazian. White, chaldean people are assiduous. Lurline is not abkhazian.", "logic": "\nEcholess(clio)\nAssiduous(clio)\nDevious(tonia)\nChaldean(tonia)\nCrenate(tonia)\nEcholess(tonia)\nAbkhazian(tonia)\nMoveable(lurline)\nChaldean(lurline)\nCrenate(lurline)\nEcholess(lurline)\nAbkhazian(lurline)\nforall x (Abkhazian(x) and Chaldean(x) -> Assiduous(x))\n\nnot Abkhazian(lurline)\n\ntherefore Abkhazian(lurline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "Godwin is unfueled. Godwin is arboreous. Acacia is fickle. Acacia is crispy. Acacia is stabile. Acacia is unfueled. Acacia is leggy. Rozella is untruthful. Rozella is crispy. Rozella is stabile. Rozella is unfueled. Rozella is leggy. White, crispy people are arboreous. Rozella is arboreous.", "logic": "\nUnfueled(godwin)\nArboreous(godwin)\nFickle(acacia)\nCrispy(acacia)\nStabile(acacia)\nUnfueled(acacia)\nLeggy(acacia)\nUntruthful(rozella)\nCrispy(rozella)\nStabile(rozella)\nUnfueled(rozella)\nLeggy(rozella)\nforall x (Leggy(x) and Crispy(x) -> Arboreous(x))\n\nArboreous(rozella)\n\nLeggy(rozella) and Crispy(rozella) and forall x (Leggy(x) and Crispy(x) -> Arboreous(x)) -> therefore Arboreous(rozella)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "Reeta is unmusical. Reeta is daredevil. Neille is disjointed. Neille is muslim. Neille is unsporting. Neille is unmusical. Neille is unheaded. Antin is ashy. Antin is muslim. Antin is unsporting. Antin is unmusical. Antin is unheaded. White, muslim people are daredevil. Antin is not daredevil.", "logic": "\nUnmusical(reeta)\nDaredevil(reeta)\nDisjointed(neille)\nMuslim(neille)\nUnsporting(neille)\nUnmusical(neille)\nUnheaded(neille)\nAshy(antin)\nMuslim(antin)\nUnsporting(antin)\nUnmusical(antin)\nUnheaded(antin)\nforall x (Unheaded(x) and Muslim(x) -> Daredevil(x))\n\nnot Daredevil(antin)\n\nUnheaded(antin) and Muslim(antin) and forall x (Unheaded(x) and Muslim(x) -> Daredevil(x)) -> therefore Daredevil(antin)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "Domenic is impressive. Domenic is concentric. Billie is knowing. Billie is roman. Billie is pyknic. Billie is impressive. Billie is malicious. Garnet is trapped. Garnet is roman. Garnet is pyknic. Garnet is impressive. Garnet is malicious. White, roman people are concentric. Domenic is not roman.", "logic": "\nImpressive(domenic)\nConcentric(domenic)\nKnowing(billie)\nRoman(billie)\nPyknic(billie)\nImpressive(billie)\nMalicious(billie)\nTrapped(garnet)\nRoman(garnet)\nPyknic(garnet)\nImpressive(garnet)\nMalicious(garnet)\nforall x (Malicious(x) and Roman(x) -> Concentric(x))\n\nnot Roman(domenic)\n\nnot Roman(domenic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "Jule is extensible. Jule is busty. Marj is pouchlike. Marj is oppositive. Marj is wheelless. Marj is extensible. Marj is turbaned. Lizzy is hard. Lizzy is oppositive. Lizzy is wheelless. Lizzy is extensible. Lizzy is turbaned. White, oppositive people are busty. Marj is hard.", "logic": "\nExtensible(jule)\nBusty(jule)\nPouchlike(marj)\nOppositive(marj)\nWheelless(marj)\nExtensible(marj)\nTurbaned(marj)\nHard(lizzy)\nOppositive(lizzy)\nWheelless(lizzy)\nExtensible(lizzy)\nTurbaned(lizzy)\nforall x (Turbaned(x) and Oppositive(x) -> Busty(x))\n\nHard(marj)\n\nHard(marj) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "Jillian is thrillful. Jillian is unwaxed. Farrand is unrequited. Farrand is inflowing. Farrand is sparkling. Farrand is thrillful. Farrand is frivolous. Arne is moonlike. Arne is inflowing. Arne is sparkling. Arne is thrillful. Arne is frivolous. White, inflowing people are unwaxed. Jillian is not sparkling.", "logic": "\nThrillful(jillian)\nUnwaxed(jillian)\nUnrequited(farrand)\nInflowing(farrand)\nSparkling(farrand)\nThrillful(farrand)\nFrivolous(farrand)\nMoonlike(arne)\nInflowing(arne)\nSparkling(arne)\nThrillful(arne)\nFrivolous(arne)\nforall x (Frivolous(x) and Inflowing(x) -> Unwaxed(x))\n\nnot Sparkling(jillian)\n\nnot Sparkling(jillian) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "Ina is dashed. Ina is despiteful. Donnie is backstairs. Donnie is beefy. Donnie is sapless. Donnie is dashed. Donnie is threadlike. Humphrey is unfunny. Humphrey is beefy. Humphrey is sapless. Humphrey is dashed. Humphrey is threadlike. White, beefy people are despiteful. Humphrey is backstairs.", "logic": "\nDashed(ina)\nDespiteful(ina)\nBackstairs(donnie)\nBeefy(donnie)\nSapless(donnie)\nDashed(donnie)\nThreadlike(donnie)\nUnfunny(humphrey)\nBeefy(humphrey)\nSapless(humphrey)\nDashed(humphrey)\nThreadlike(humphrey)\nforall x (Threadlike(x) and Beefy(x) -> Despiteful(x))\n\nBackstairs(humphrey)\n\nBackstairs(humphrey) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-2790"} {"premises": "The thorvald bate the bobbette. The thorvald is compounded. The thorvald is caesural. The thorvald homer the bobbette. The bobbette is auricular. The bobbette is caesural. The bobbette homer the thorvald. The bobbette comprise the doralynne. The doralynne bate the thorvald. The doralynne is deafened. The doralynne homer the bobbette. The doralynne comprise the thorvald. If someone is auricular and they like the doralynne then the doralynne is not hyaline. If someone bate the thorvald then the thorvald comprise the bobbette. If the doralynne bate the bobbette and the bobbette does not chase the doralynne then the doralynne homer the thorvald. If someone is hyaline then they do not like the bobbette. If someone comprise the bobbette then the bobbette is hyaline. If someone homer the doralynne and the doralynne homer the thorvald then they are deafened. If the bobbette does not like the thorvald then the thorvald is deafened. If someone is deafened and not hyaline then they are not caesural. The thorvald is caesural.", "logic": "\nBate(thorvald, bobbette)\nCompounded(thorvald)\nCaesural(thorvald)\nHomer(thorvald, bobbette)\nAuricular(bobbette)\nCaesural(bobbette)\nHomer(bobbette, thorvald)\nComprise(bobbette, doralynne)\nBate(doralynne, thorvald)\nDeafened(doralynne)\nHomer(doralynne, bobbette)\nComprise(doralynne, thorvald)\nforall x (Auricular(x) and Homer(x, doralynne) -> not Hyaline(doralynne))\nforall x (Bate(x, thorvald) -> Comprise(thorvald, bobbette))\nBate(doralynne, bobbette) and not Bate(bobbette, doralynne) -> Homer(doralynne, thorvald)\nforall x (Hyaline(x) -> not Homer(x, bobbette))\nforall x (Comprise(x, bobbette) -> Hyaline(bobbette))\nforall x (Homer(x, doralynne) and Homer(doralynne, thorvald) -> Deafened(x))\nnot Homer(bobbette, thorvald) -> Deafened(thorvald)\nforall x (Deafened(x) and not Hyaline(x) -> not Caesural(x))\n\nCaesural(thorvald)\n\ntherefore Caesural(thorvald)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The mitchel access the carlita. The mitchel is grey. The mitchel is jeering. The mitchel bespeak the carlita. The carlita is arctic. The carlita is jeering. The carlita bespeak the mitchel. The carlita marcel the joachim. The joachim access the mitchel. The joachim is dural. The joachim bespeak the carlita. The joachim marcel the mitchel. If someone is arctic and they like the joachim then the joachim is not exalted. If someone access the mitchel then the mitchel marcel the carlita. If the joachim access the carlita and the carlita does not chase the joachim then the joachim bespeak the mitchel. If someone is exalted then they do not like the carlita. If someone marcel the carlita then the carlita is exalted. If someone bespeak the joachim and the joachim bespeak the mitchel then they are dural. If the carlita does not like the mitchel then the mitchel is dural. If someone is dural and not exalted then they are not jeering. The mitchel is not grey.", "logic": "\nAccess(mitchel, carlita)\nGrey(mitchel)\nJeering(mitchel)\nBespeak(mitchel, carlita)\nArctic(carlita)\nJeering(carlita)\nBespeak(carlita, mitchel)\nMarcel(carlita, joachim)\nAccess(joachim, mitchel)\nDural(joachim)\nBespeak(joachim, carlita)\nMarcel(joachim, mitchel)\nforall x (Arctic(x) and Bespeak(x, joachim) -> not Exalted(joachim))\nforall x (Access(x, mitchel) -> Marcel(mitchel, carlita))\nAccess(joachim, carlita) and not Access(carlita, joachim) -> Bespeak(joachim, mitchel)\nforall x (Exalted(x) -> not Bespeak(x, carlita))\nforall x (Marcel(x, carlita) -> Exalted(carlita))\nforall x (Bespeak(x, joachim) and Bespeak(joachim, mitchel) -> Dural(x))\nnot Bespeak(carlita, mitchel) -> Dural(mitchel)\nforall x (Dural(x) and not Exalted(x) -> not Jeering(x))\n\nnot Grey(mitchel)\n\ntherefore Grey(mitchel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The dimitrios higgle the cinnamon. The dimitrios is bauxitic. The dimitrios is confiding. The dimitrios wield the cinnamon. The cinnamon is agonised. The cinnamon is confiding. The cinnamon wield the dimitrios. The cinnamon intersect the dulsea. The dulsea higgle the dimitrios. The dulsea is interested. The dulsea wield the cinnamon. The dulsea intersect the dimitrios. If someone is agonised and they like the dulsea then the dulsea is not twilit. If someone higgle the dimitrios then the dimitrios intersect the cinnamon. If the dulsea higgle the cinnamon and the cinnamon does not chase the dulsea then the dulsea wield the dimitrios. If someone is twilit then they do not like the cinnamon. If someone intersect the cinnamon then the cinnamon is twilit. If someone wield the dulsea and the dulsea wield the dimitrios then they are interested. If the cinnamon does not like the dimitrios then the dimitrios is interested. If someone is interested and not twilit then they are not confiding. The dimitrios intersect the cinnamon.", "logic": "\nHiggle(dimitrios, cinnamon)\nBauxitic(dimitrios)\nConfiding(dimitrios)\nWield(dimitrios, cinnamon)\nAgonised(cinnamon)\nConfiding(cinnamon)\nWield(cinnamon, dimitrios)\nIntersect(cinnamon, dulsea)\nHiggle(dulsea, dimitrios)\nInterested(dulsea)\nWield(dulsea, cinnamon)\nIntersect(dulsea, dimitrios)\nforall x (Agonised(x) and Wield(x, dulsea) -> not Twilit(dulsea))\nforall x (Higgle(x, dimitrios) -> Intersect(dimitrios, cinnamon))\nHiggle(dulsea, cinnamon) and not Higgle(cinnamon, dulsea) -> Wield(dulsea, dimitrios)\nforall x (Twilit(x) -> not Wield(x, cinnamon))\nforall x (Intersect(x, cinnamon) -> Twilit(cinnamon))\nforall x (Wield(x, dulsea) and Wield(dulsea, dimitrios) -> Interested(x))\nnot Wield(cinnamon, dimitrios) -> Interested(dimitrios)\nforall x (Interested(x) and not Twilit(x) -> not Confiding(x))\n\nIntersect(dimitrios, cinnamon)\n\nHiggle(dulsea, dimitrios) and forall x (Higgle(x, dimitrios) -> Intersect(dimitrios, cinnamon)) -> therefore Intersect(dimitrios, cinnamon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The elane deliver the verla. The elane is hidden. The elane is honorary. The elane garrote the verla. The verla is entrenched. The verla is honorary. The verla garrote the elane. The verla confine the jewel. The jewel deliver the elane. The jewel is ataractic. The jewel garrote the verla. The jewel confine the elane. If someone is entrenched and they like the jewel then the jewel is not noseless. If someone deliver the elane then the elane confine the verla. If the jewel deliver the verla and the verla does not chase the jewel then the jewel garrote the elane. If someone is noseless then they do not like the verla. If someone confine the verla then the verla is noseless. If someone garrote the jewel and the jewel garrote the elane then they are ataractic. If the verla does not like the elane then the elane is ataractic. If someone is ataractic and not noseless then they are not honorary. The elane does not need the verla.", "logic": "\nDeliver(elane, verla)\nHidden(elane)\nHonorary(elane)\nGarrote(elane, verla)\nEntrenched(verla)\nHonorary(verla)\nGarrote(verla, elane)\nConfine(verla, jewel)\nDeliver(jewel, elane)\nAtaractic(jewel)\nGarrote(jewel, verla)\nConfine(jewel, elane)\nforall x (Entrenched(x) and Garrote(x, jewel) -> not Noseless(jewel))\nforall x (Deliver(x, elane) -> Confine(elane, verla))\nDeliver(jewel, verla) and not Deliver(verla, jewel) -> Garrote(jewel, elane)\nforall x (Noseless(x) -> not Garrote(x, verla))\nforall x (Confine(x, verla) -> Noseless(verla))\nforall x (Garrote(x, jewel) and Garrote(jewel, elane) -> Ataractic(x))\nnot Garrote(verla, elane) -> Ataractic(elane)\nforall x (Ataractic(x) and not Noseless(x) -> not Honorary(x))\n\nnot Confine(elane, verla)\n\nDeliver(jewel, elane) and forall x (Deliver(x, elane) -> Confine(elane, verla)) -> therefore Confine(elane, verla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The ginger rummage the dawn. The ginger is heathlike. The ginger is crapulous. The ginger shanghai the dawn. The dawn is rhetorical. The dawn is crapulous. The dawn shanghai the ginger. The dawn disconnect the ronica. The ronica rummage the ginger. The ronica is uncool. The ronica shanghai the dawn. The ronica disconnect the ginger. If someone is rhetorical and they like the ronica then the ronica is not homonymous. If someone rummage the ginger then the ginger disconnect the dawn. If the ronica rummage the dawn and the dawn does not chase the ronica then the ronica shanghai the ginger. If someone is homonymous then they do not like the dawn. If someone disconnect the dawn then the dawn is homonymous. If someone shanghai the ronica and the ronica shanghai the ginger then they are uncool. If the dawn does not like the ginger then the ginger is uncool. If someone is uncool and not homonymous then they are not crapulous. The dawn is homonymous.", "logic": "\nRummage(ginger, dawn)\nHeathlike(ginger)\nCrapulous(ginger)\nShanghai(ginger, dawn)\nRhetorical(dawn)\nCrapulous(dawn)\nShanghai(dawn, ginger)\nDisconnect(dawn, ronica)\nRummage(ronica, ginger)\nUncool(ronica)\nShanghai(ronica, dawn)\nDisconnect(ronica, ginger)\nforall x (Rhetorical(x) and Shanghai(x, ronica) -> not Homonymous(ronica))\nforall x (Rummage(x, ginger) -> Disconnect(ginger, dawn))\nRummage(ronica, dawn) and not Rummage(dawn, ronica) -> Shanghai(ronica, ginger)\nforall x (Homonymous(x) -> not Shanghai(x, dawn))\nforall x (Disconnect(x, dawn) -> Homonymous(dawn))\nforall x (Shanghai(x, ronica) and Shanghai(ronica, ginger) -> Uncool(x))\nnot Shanghai(dawn, ginger) -> Uncool(ginger)\nforall x (Uncool(x) and not Homonymous(x) -> not Crapulous(x))\n\nHomonymous(dawn)\n\nRummage(ronica, ginger) and forall x (Rummage(x, ginger) -> Disconnect(ginger, dawn)) -> therefore Disconnect(ginger, dawn) Disconnect(ginger, dawn) and forall x (Disconnect(x, dawn) -> Homonymous(dawn)) -> therefore Homonymous(dawn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The javier felicitate the dorine. The javier is beardless. The javier is crinkly. The javier infer the dorine. The dorine is arboresque. The dorine is crinkly. The dorine infer the javier. The dorine ease the anatollo. The anatollo felicitate the javier. The anatollo is vulgar. The anatollo infer the dorine. The anatollo ease the javier. If someone is arboresque and they like the anatollo then the anatollo is not palmar. If someone felicitate the javier then the javier ease the dorine. If the anatollo felicitate the dorine and the dorine does not chase the anatollo then the anatollo infer the javier. If someone is palmar then they do not like the dorine. If someone ease the dorine then the dorine is palmar. If someone infer the anatollo and the anatollo infer the javier then they are vulgar. If the dorine does not like the javier then the javier is vulgar. If someone is vulgar and not palmar then they are not crinkly. The dorine is not palmar.", "logic": "\nFelicitate(javier, dorine)\nBeardless(javier)\nCrinkly(javier)\nInfer(javier, dorine)\nArboresque(dorine)\nCrinkly(dorine)\nInfer(dorine, javier)\nEase(dorine, anatollo)\nFelicitate(anatollo, javier)\nVulgar(anatollo)\nInfer(anatollo, dorine)\nEase(anatollo, javier)\nforall x (Arboresque(x) and Infer(x, anatollo) -> not Palmar(anatollo))\nforall x (Felicitate(x, javier) -> Ease(javier, dorine))\nFelicitate(anatollo, dorine) and not Felicitate(dorine, anatollo) -> Infer(anatollo, javier)\nforall x (Palmar(x) -> not Infer(x, dorine))\nforall x (Ease(x, dorine) -> Palmar(dorine))\nforall x (Infer(x, anatollo) and Infer(anatollo, javier) -> Vulgar(x))\nnot Infer(dorine, javier) -> Vulgar(javier)\nforall x (Vulgar(x) and not Palmar(x) -> not Crinkly(x))\n\nnot Palmar(dorine)\n\nFelicitate(anatollo, javier) and forall x (Felicitate(x, javier) -> Ease(javier, dorine)) -> therefore Ease(javier, dorine) Ease(javier, dorine) and forall x (Ease(x, dorine) -> Palmar(dorine)) -> therefore Palmar(dorine)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The isidora retrain the melodie. The isidora is tidy. The isidora is infrahuman. The isidora rustle the melodie. The melodie is prissy. The melodie is infrahuman. The melodie rustle the isidora. The melodie concenter the harmony. The harmony retrain the isidora. The harmony is wearing. The harmony rustle the melodie. The harmony concenter the isidora. If someone is prissy and they like the harmony then the harmony is not zestful. If someone retrain the isidora then the isidora concenter the melodie. If the harmony retrain the melodie and the melodie does not chase the harmony then the harmony rustle the isidora. If someone is zestful then they do not like the melodie. If someone concenter the melodie then the melodie is zestful. If someone rustle the harmony and the harmony rustle the isidora then they are wearing. If the melodie does not like the isidora then the isidora is wearing. If someone is wearing and not zestful then they are not infrahuman. The melodie does not like the melodie.", "logic": "\nRetrain(isidora, melodie)\nTidy(isidora)\nInfrahuman(isidora)\nRustle(isidora, melodie)\nPrissy(melodie)\nInfrahuman(melodie)\nRustle(melodie, isidora)\nConcenter(melodie, harmony)\nRetrain(harmony, isidora)\nWearing(harmony)\nRustle(harmony, melodie)\nConcenter(harmony, isidora)\nforall x (Prissy(x) and Rustle(x, harmony) -> not Zestful(harmony))\nforall x (Retrain(x, isidora) -> Concenter(isidora, melodie))\nRetrain(harmony, melodie) and not Retrain(melodie, harmony) -> Rustle(harmony, isidora)\nforall x (Zestful(x) -> not Rustle(x, melodie))\nforall x (Concenter(x, melodie) -> Zestful(melodie))\nforall x (Rustle(x, harmony) and Rustle(harmony, isidora) -> Wearing(x))\nnot Rustle(melodie, isidora) -> Wearing(isidora)\nforall x (Wearing(x) and not Zestful(x) -> not Infrahuman(x))\n\nnot Rustle(melodie, melodie)\n\nRetrain(harmony, isidora) and forall x (Retrain(x, isidora) -> Concenter(isidora, melodie)) -> therefore Concenter(isidora, melodie) Concenter(isidora, melodie) and forall x (Concenter(x, melodie) -> Zestful(melodie)) -> therefore Zestful(melodie) Zestful(melodie) and forall x (Zestful(x) -> not Rustle(x, melodie)) -> therefore not Rustle(melodie, melodie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The cindie unseat the gustav. The cindie is unchanged. The cindie is unholy. The cindie deal the gustav. The gustav is shaven. The gustav is unholy. The gustav deal the cindie. The gustav shingle the jermayne. The jermayne unseat the cindie. The jermayne is puissant. The jermayne deal the gustav. The jermayne shingle the cindie. If someone is shaven and they like the jermayne then the jermayne is not hooflike. If someone unseat the cindie then the cindie shingle the gustav. If the jermayne unseat the gustav and the gustav does not chase the jermayne then the jermayne deal the cindie. If someone is hooflike then they do not like the gustav. If someone shingle the gustav then the gustav is hooflike. If someone deal the jermayne and the jermayne deal the cindie then they are puissant. If the gustav does not like the cindie then the cindie is puissant. If someone is puissant and not hooflike then they are not unholy. The gustav deal the gustav.", "logic": "\nUnseat(cindie, gustav)\nUnchanged(cindie)\nUnholy(cindie)\nDeal(cindie, gustav)\nShaven(gustav)\nUnholy(gustav)\nDeal(gustav, cindie)\nShingle(gustav, jermayne)\nUnseat(jermayne, cindie)\nPuissant(jermayne)\nDeal(jermayne, gustav)\nShingle(jermayne, cindie)\nforall x (Shaven(x) and Deal(x, jermayne) -> not Hooflike(jermayne))\nforall x (Unseat(x, cindie) -> Shingle(cindie, gustav))\nUnseat(jermayne, gustav) and not Unseat(gustav, jermayne) -> Deal(jermayne, cindie)\nforall x (Hooflike(x) -> not Deal(x, gustav))\nforall x (Shingle(x, gustav) -> Hooflike(gustav))\nforall x (Deal(x, jermayne) and Deal(jermayne, cindie) -> Puissant(x))\nnot Deal(gustav, cindie) -> Puissant(cindie)\nforall x (Puissant(x) and not Hooflike(x) -> not Unholy(x))\n\nDeal(gustav, gustav)\n\nUnseat(jermayne, cindie) and forall x (Unseat(x, cindie) -> Shingle(cindie, gustav)) -> therefore Shingle(cindie, gustav) Shingle(cindie, gustav) and forall x (Shingle(x, gustav) -> Hooflike(gustav)) -> therefore Hooflike(gustav) Hooflike(gustav) and forall x (Hooflike(x) -> not Deal(x, gustav)) -> therefore not Deal(gustav, gustav)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The ailyn glow the linnet. The ailyn is reciprocal. The ailyn is tanzanian. The ailyn bulldog the linnet. The linnet is aliform. The linnet is tanzanian. The linnet bulldog the ailyn. The linnet bias the dickey. The dickey glow the ailyn. The dickey is blustering. The dickey bulldog the linnet. The dickey bias the ailyn. If someone is aliform and they like the dickey then the dickey is not prudent. If someone glow the ailyn then the ailyn bias the linnet. If the dickey glow the linnet and the linnet does not chase the dickey then the dickey bulldog the ailyn. If someone is prudent then they do not like the linnet. If someone bias the linnet then the linnet is prudent. If someone bulldog the dickey and the dickey bulldog the ailyn then they are blustering. If the linnet does not like the ailyn then the ailyn is blustering. If someone is blustering and not prudent then they are not tanzanian. The ailyn is not blustering.", "logic": "\nGlow(ailyn, linnet)\nReciprocal(ailyn)\nTanzanian(ailyn)\nBulldog(ailyn, linnet)\nAliform(linnet)\nTanzanian(linnet)\nBulldog(linnet, ailyn)\nBias(linnet, dickey)\nGlow(dickey, ailyn)\nBlustering(dickey)\nBulldog(dickey, linnet)\nBias(dickey, ailyn)\nforall x (Aliform(x) and Bulldog(x, dickey) -> not Prudent(dickey))\nforall x (Glow(x, ailyn) -> Bias(ailyn, linnet))\nGlow(dickey, linnet) and not Glow(linnet, dickey) -> Bulldog(dickey, ailyn)\nforall x (Prudent(x) -> not Bulldog(x, linnet))\nforall x (Bias(x, linnet) -> Prudent(linnet))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, dickey) and Bulldog(dickey, ailyn) -> Blustering(x))\nnot Bulldog(linnet, ailyn) -> Blustering(ailyn)\nforall x (Blustering(x) and not Prudent(x) -> not Tanzanian(x))\n\nnot Blustering(ailyn)\n\nforall x (Bulldog(x, dickey) and Bulldog(dickey, ailyn) -> Blustering(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The rosalyn adulterate the danice. The rosalyn is aphonic. The rosalyn is fair. The rosalyn reallot the danice. The danice is bodied. The danice is fair. The danice reallot the rosalyn. The danice channelise the adolf. The adolf adulterate the rosalyn. The adolf is infrequent. The adolf reallot the danice. The adolf channelise the rosalyn. If someone is bodied and they like the adolf then the adolf is not half. If someone adulterate the rosalyn then the rosalyn channelise the danice. If the adolf adulterate the danice and the danice does not chase the adolf then the adolf reallot the rosalyn. If someone is half then they do not like the danice. If someone channelise the danice then the danice is half. If someone reallot the adolf and the adolf reallot the rosalyn then they are infrequent. If the danice does not like the rosalyn then the rosalyn is infrequent. If someone is infrequent and not half then they are not fair. The danice is infrequent.", "logic": "\nAdulterate(rosalyn, danice)\nAphonic(rosalyn)\nFair(rosalyn)\nReallot(rosalyn, danice)\nBodied(danice)\nFair(danice)\nReallot(danice, rosalyn)\nChannelise(danice, adolf)\nAdulterate(adolf, rosalyn)\nInfrequent(adolf)\nReallot(adolf, danice)\nChannelise(adolf, rosalyn)\nforall x (Bodied(x) and Reallot(x, adolf) -> not Half(adolf))\nforall x (Adulterate(x, rosalyn) -> Channelise(rosalyn, danice))\nAdulterate(adolf, danice) and not Adulterate(danice, adolf) -> Reallot(adolf, rosalyn)\nforall x (Half(x) -> not Reallot(x, danice))\nforall x (Channelise(x, danice) -> Half(danice))\nforall x (Reallot(x, adolf) and Reallot(adolf, rosalyn) -> Infrequent(x))\nnot Reallot(danice, rosalyn) -> Infrequent(rosalyn)\nforall x (Infrequent(x) and not Half(x) -> not Fair(x))\n\nInfrequent(danice)\n\nforall x (Reallot(x, adolf) and Reallot(adolf, rosalyn) -> Infrequent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The zane trail the jules. The zane is flaxen. The zane is blithe. The zane colligate the jules. The jules is grievous. The jules is blithe. The jules colligate the zane. The jules meditate the kari. The kari trail the zane. The kari is synoecious. The kari colligate the jules. The kari meditate the zane. If someone is grievous and they like the kari then the kari is not tractable. If someone trail the zane then the zane meditate the jules. If the kari trail the jules and the jules does not chase the kari then the kari colligate the zane. If someone is tractable then they do not like the jules. If someone meditate the jules then the jules is tractable. If someone colligate the kari and the kari colligate the zane then they are synoecious. If the jules does not like the zane then the zane is synoecious. If someone is synoecious and not tractable then they are not blithe. The kari does not like the zane.", "logic": "\nTrail(zane, jules)\nFlaxen(zane)\nBlithe(zane)\nColligate(zane, jules)\nGrievous(jules)\nBlithe(jules)\nColligate(jules, zane)\nMeditate(jules, kari)\nTrail(kari, zane)\nSynoecious(kari)\nColligate(kari, jules)\nMeditate(kari, zane)\nforall x (Grievous(x) and Colligate(x, kari) -> not Tractable(kari))\nforall x (Trail(x, zane) -> Meditate(zane, jules))\nTrail(kari, jules) and not Trail(jules, kari) -> Colligate(kari, zane)\nforall x (Tractable(x) -> not Colligate(x, jules))\nforall x (Meditate(x, jules) -> Tractable(jules))\nforall x (Colligate(x, kari) and Colligate(kari, zane) -> Synoecious(x))\nnot Colligate(jules, zane) -> Synoecious(zane)\nforall x (Synoecious(x) and not Tractable(x) -> not Blithe(x))\n\nnot Colligate(kari, zane)\n\nTrail(kari, jules) and not Trail(jules, kari) -> Colligate(kari, zane) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The isabelita unloosen the berty. The isabelita is oblique. The isabelita is xliv. The isabelita glamourise the berty. The berty is yellowed. The berty is xliv. The berty glamourise the isabelita. The berty preheat the evy. The evy unloosen the isabelita. The evy is cogitable. The evy glamourise the berty. The evy preheat the isabelita. If someone is yellowed and they like the evy then the evy is not fledgeless. If someone unloosen the isabelita then the isabelita preheat the berty. If the evy unloosen the berty and the berty does not chase the evy then the evy glamourise the isabelita. If someone is fledgeless then they do not like the berty. If someone preheat the berty then the berty is fledgeless. If someone glamourise the evy and the evy glamourise the isabelita then they are cogitable. If the berty does not like the isabelita then the isabelita is cogitable. If someone is cogitable and not fledgeless then they are not xliv. The evy is oblique.", "logic": "\nUnloosen(isabelita, berty)\nOblique(isabelita)\nXliv(isabelita)\nGlamourise(isabelita, berty)\nYellowed(berty)\nXliv(berty)\nGlamourise(berty, isabelita)\nPreheat(berty, evy)\nUnloosen(evy, isabelita)\nCogitable(evy)\nGlamourise(evy, berty)\nPreheat(evy, isabelita)\nforall x (Yellowed(x) and Glamourise(x, evy) -> not Fledgeless(evy))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, isabelita) -> Preheat(isabelita, berty))\nUnloosen(evy, berty) and not Unloosen(berty, evy) -> Glamourise(evy, isabelita)\nforall x (Fledgeless(x) -> not Glamourise(x, berty))\nforall x (Preheat(x, berty) -> Fledgeless(berty))\nforall x (Glamourise(x, evy) and Glamourise(evy, isabelita) -> Cogitable(x))\nnot Glamourise(berty, isabelita) -> Cogitable(isabelita)\nforall x (Cogitable(x) and not Fledgeless(x) -> not Xliv(x))\n\nOblique(evy)\n\nOblique(evy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The ertha reminisce the malcolm. The ertha is aglow. The ertha is minute. The ertha minstrel the malcolm. The malcolm is birken. The malcolm is minute. The malcolm minstrel the ertha. The malcolm legalize the bonny. The bonny reminisce the ertha. The bonny is fractious. The bonny minstrel the malcolm. The bonny legalize the ertha. If someone is birken and they like the bonny then the bonny is not imbecile. If someone reminisce the ertha then the ertha legalize the malcolm. If the bonny reminisce the malcolm and the malcolm does not chase the bonny then the bonny minstrel the ertha. If someone is imbecile then they do not like the malcolm. If someone legalize the malcolm then the malcolm is imbecile. If someone minstrel the bonny and the bonny minstrel the ertha then they are fractious. If the malcolm does not like the ertha then the ertha is fractious. If someone is fractious and not imbecile then they are not minute. The ertha does not like the ertha.", "logic": "\nReminisce(ertha, malcolm)\nAglow(ertha)\nMinute(ertha)\nMinstrel(ertha, malcolm)\nBirken(malcolm)\nMinute(malcolm)\nMinstrel(malcolm, ertha)\nLegalize(malcolm, bonny)\nReminisce(bonny, ertha)\nFractious(bonny)\nMinstrel(bonny, malcolm)\nLegalize(bonny, ertha)\nforall x (Birken(x) and Minstrel(x, bonny) -> not Imbecile(bonny))\nforall x (Reminisce(x, ertha) -> Legalize(ertha, malcolm))\nReminisce(bonny, malcolm) and not Reminisce(malcolm, bonny) -> Minstrel(bonny, ertha)\nforall x (Imbecile(x) -> not Minstrel(x, malcolm))\nforall x (Legalize(x, malcolm) -> Imbecile(malcolm))\nforall x (Minstrel(x, bonny) and Minstrel(bonny, ertha) -> Fractious(x))\nnot Minstrel(malcolm, ertha) -> Fractious(ertha)\nforall x (Fractious(x) and not Imbecile(x) -> not Minute(x))\n\nnot Minstrel(ertha, ertha)\n\nnot Minstrel(ertha, ertha) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The terrill major the jeramie. The terrill is inner. The terrill is overhanded. The terrill elate the jeramie. The jeramie is shelled. The jeramie is overhanded. The jeramie elate the terrill. The jeramie empale the cyndi. The cyndi major the terrill. The cyndi is lidded. The cyndi elate the jeramie. The cyndi empale the terrill. If someone is shelled and they like the cyndi then the cyndi is not razed. If someone major the terrill then the terrill empale the jeramie. If the cyndi major the jeramie and the jeramie does not chase the cyndi then the cyndi elate the terrill. If someone is razed then they do not like the jeramie. If someone empale the jeramie then the jeramie is razed. If someone elate the cyndi and the cyndi elate the terrill then they are lidded. If the jeramie does not like the terrill then the terrill is lidded. If someone is lidded and not razed then they are not overhanded. The terrill empale the terrill.", "logic": "\nMajor(terrill, jeramie)\nInner(terrill)\nOverhanded(terrill)\nElate(terrill, jeramie)\nShelled(jeramie)\nOverhanded(jeramie)\nElate(jeramie, terrill)\nEmpale(jeramie, cyndi)\nMajor(cyndi, terrill)\nLidded(cyndi)\nElate(cyndi, jeramie)\nEmpale(cyndi, terrill)\nforall x (Shelled(x) and Elate(x, cyndi) -> not Razed(cyndi))\nforall x (Major(x, terrill) -> Empale(terrill, jeramie))\nMajor(cyndi, jeramie) and not Major(jeramie, cyndi) -> Elate(cyndi, terrill)\nforall x (Razed(x) -> not Elate(x, jeramie))\nforall x (Empale(x, jeramie) -> Razed(jeramie))\nforall x (Elate(x, cyndi) and Elate(cyndi, terrill) -> Lidded(x))\nnot Elate(jeramie, terrill) -> Lidded(terrill)\nforall x (Lidded(x) and not Razed(x) -> not Overhanded(x))\n\nEmpale(terrill, terrill)\n\nEmpale(terrill, terrill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The aditya bottom the zondra. The aditya is uninjured. The aditya is satiate. The aditya emerge the zondra. The zondra is chagrined. The zondra is satiate. The zondra emerge the aditya. The zondra construe the binnie. The binnie bottom the aditya. The binnie is oaken. The binnie emerge the zondra. The binnie construe the aditya. If someone is chagrined and they like the binnie then the binnie is not romaic. If someone bottom the aditya then the aditya construe the zondra. If the binnie bottom the zondra and the zondra does not chase the binnie then the binnie emerge the aditya. If someone is romaic then they do not like the zondra. If someone construe the zondra then the zondra is romaic. If someone emerge the binnie and the binnie emerge the aditya then they are oaken. If the zondra does not like the aditya then the aditya is oaken. If someone is oaken and not romaic then they are not satiate. The aditya does not like the binnie.", "logic": "\nBottom(aditya, zondra)\nUninjured(aditya)\nSatiate(aditya)\nEmerge(aditya, zondra)\nChagrined(zondra)\nSatiate(zondra)\nEmerge(zondra, aditya)\nConstrue(zondra, binnie)\nBottom(binnie, aditya)\nOaken(binnie)\nEmerge(binnie, zondra)\nConstrue(binnie, aditya)\nforall x (Chagrined(x) and Emerge(x, binnie) -> not Romaic(binnie))\nforall x (Bottom(x, aditya) -> Construe(aditya, zondra))\nBottom(binnie, zondra) and not Bottom(zondra, binnie) -> Emerge(binnie, aditya)\nforall x (Romaic(x) -> not Emerge(x, zondra))\nforall x (Construe(x, zondra) -> Romaic(zondra))\nforall x (Emerge(x, binnie) and Emerge(binnie, aditya) -> Oaken(x))\nnot Emerge(zondra, aditya) -> Oaken(aditya)\nforall x (Oaken(x) and not Romaic(x) -> not Satiate(x))\n\nnot Emerge(aditya, binnie)\n\nnot Emerge(aditya, binnie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "The matthieu suggest the lianne. The matthieu is rangy. The matthieu is lacy. The matthieu chitchat the lianne. The lianne is spiny. The lianne is lacy. The lianne chitchat the matthieu. The lianne blub the zebedee. The zebedee suggest the matthieu. The zebedee is tamable. The zebedee chitchat the lianne. The zebedee blub the matthieu. If someone is spiny and they like the zebedee then the zebedee is not spikelike. If someone suggest the matthieu then the matthieu blub the lianne. If the zebedee suggest the lianne and the lianne does not chase the zebedee then the zebedee chitchat the matthieu. If someone is spikelike then they do not like the lianne. If someone blub the lianne then the lianne is spikelike. If someone chitchat the zebedee and the zebedee chitchat the matthieu then they are tamable. If the lianne does not like the matthieu then the matthieu is tamable. If someone is tamable and not spikelike then they are not lacy. The zebedee is lacy.", "logic": "\nSuggest(matthieu, lianne)\nRangy(matthieu)\nLacy(matthieu)\nChitchat(matthieu, lianne)\nSpiny(lianne)\nLacy(lianne)\nChitchat(lianne, matthieu)\nBlub(lianne, zebedee)\nSuggest(zebedee, matthieu)\nTamable(zebedee)\nChitchat(zebedee, lianne)\nBlub(zebedee, matthieu)\nforall x (Spiny(x) and Chitchat(x, zebedee) -> not Spikelike(zebedee))\nforall x (Suggest(x, matthieu) -> Blub(matthieu, lianne))\nSuggest(zebedee, lianne) and not Suggest(lianne, zebedee) -> Chitchat(zebedee, matthieu)\nforall x (Spikelike(x) -> not Chitchat(x, lianne))\nforall x (Blub(x, lianne) -> Spikelike(lianne))\nforall x (Chitchat(x, zebedee) and Chitchat(zebedee, matthieu) -> Tamable(x))\nnot Chitchat(lianne, matthieu) -> Tamable(matthieu)\nforall x (Tamable(x) and not Spikelike(x) -> not Lacy(x))\n\nLacy(zebedee)\n\nLacy(zebedee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-299"} {"premises": "Lucky is not amerciable. Lucky is binuclear. Alexina is amerciable. Alexina is cacodylic. Alexina is unconsumed. Alexina is unextended. Merrily is univalve. Merrily is unconsumed. Wakefield is not univalve. Wakefield is cacodylic. If something is cacodylic and not amerciable then it is binuclear. If something is cacodylic and not amerciable then it is univalve. If something is binuclear and not amerciable then it is cacodylic. If something is cacodylic and not univalve then it is unconsumed. If something is amerciable and not univalve then it is unconsumed. All cacodylic, univalve things are unextended. If something is unconsumed and not amerciable then it is unextended. If something is univalve then it is unextended. Wakefield is cacodylic.", "logic": "\nnot Amerciable(lucky)\nBinuclear(lucky)\nAmerciable(alexina)\nCacodylic(alexina)\nUnconsumed(alexina)\nUnextended(alexina)\nUnivalve(merrily)\nUnconsumed(merrily)\nnot Univalve(wakefield)\nCacodylic(wakefield)\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and not Amerciable(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and not Amerciable(x) -> Univalve(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and not Amerciable(x) -> Cacodylic(x))\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and not Univalve(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nforall x (Amerciable(x) and not Univalve(x) -> Unconsumed(x))\nforall x (Cacodylic(x) and Univalve(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Unconsumed(x) and not Amerciable(x) -> Unextended(x))\nforall x (Univalve(x) -> Unextended(x))\n\nCacodylic(wakefield)\n\ntherefore Cacodylic(wakefield)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Collins is not pricy. Collins is nonplused. Zachary is pricy. Zachary is historied. Zachary is chic. Zachary is victorian. Halie is expectable. Halie is chic. Haven is not expectable. Haven is historied. If something is historied and not pricy then it is nonplused. If something is historied and not pricy then it is expectable. If something is nonplused and not pricy then it is historied. If something is historied and not expectable then it is chic. If something is pricy and not expectable then it is chic. All historied, expectable things are victorian. If something is chic and not pricy then it is victorian. If something is expectable then it is victorian. Zachary is not pricy.", "logic": "\nnot Pricy(collins)\nNonplused(collins)\nPricy(zachary)\nHistoried(zachary)\nChic(zachary)\nVictorian(zachary)\nExpectable(halie)\nChic(halie)\nnot Expectable(haven)\nHistoried(haven)\nforall x (Historied(x) and not Pricy(x) -> Nonplused(x))\nforall x (Historied(x) and not Pricy(x) -> Expectable(x))\nforall x (Nonplused(x) and not Pricy(x) -> Historied(x))\nforall x (Historied(x) and not Expectable(x) -> Chic(x))\nforall x (Pricy(x) and not Expectable(x) -> Chic(x))\nforall x (Historied(x) and Expectable(x) -> Victorian(x))\nforall x (Chic(x) and not Pricy(x) -> Victorian(x))\nforall x (Expectable(x) -> Victorian(x))\n\nnot Pricy(zachary)\n\ntherefore Pricy(zachary)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Tam is not veiled. Tam is subalpine. Lissy is veiled. Lissy is absorbent. Lissy is oviparous. Lissy is incarnate. Sabine is luckless. Sabine is oviparous. Modesta is not luckless. Modesta is absorbent. If something is absorbent and not veiled then it is subalpine. If something is absorbent and not veiled then it is luckless. If something is subalpine and not veiled then it is absorbent. If something is absorbent and not luckless then it is oviparous. If something is veiled and not luckless then it is oviparous. All absorbent, luckless things are incarnate. If something is oviparous and not veiled then it is incarnate. If something is luckless then it is incarnate. Sabine is incarnate.", "logic": "\nnot Veiled(tam)\nSubalpine(tam)\nVeiled(lissy)\nAbsorbent(lissy)\nOviparous(lissy)\nIncarnate(lissy)\nLuckless(sabine)\nOviparous(sabine)\nnot Luckless(modesta)\nAbsorbent(modesta)\nforall x (Absorbent(x) and not Veiled(x) -> Subalpine(x))\nforall x (Absorbent(x) and not Veiled(x) -> Luckless(x))\nforall x (Subalpine(x) and not Veiled(x) -> Absorbent(x))\nforall x (Absorbent(x) and not Luckless(x) -> Oviparous(x))\nforall x (Veiled(x) and not Luckless(x) -> Oviparous(x))\nforall x (Absorbent(x) and Luckless(x) -> Incarnate(x))\nforall x (Oviparous(x) and not Veiled(x) -> Incarnate(x))\nforall x (Luckless(x) -> Incarnate(x))\n\nIncarnate(sabine)\n\nLuckless(sabine) and forall x (Luckless(x) -> Incarnate(x)) -> therefore Incarnate(sabine)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Gerard is not endowed. Gerard is rancorous. Paola is endowed. Paola is sickening. Paola is constant. Paola is unedited. Myranda is mythologic. Myranda is constant. Hermann is not mythologic. Hermann is sickening. If something is sickening and not endowed then it is rancorous. If something is sickening and not endowed then it is mythologic. If something is rancorous and not endowed then it is sickening. If something is sickening and not mythologic then it is constant. If something is endowed and not mythologic then it is constant. All sickening, mythologic things are unedited. If something is constant and not endowed then it is unedited. If something is mythologic then it is unedited. Gerard is not sickening.", "logic": "\nnot Endowed(gerard)\nRancorous(gerard)\nEndowed(paola)\nSickening(paola)\nConstant(paola)\nUnedited(paola)\nMythologic(myranda)\nConstant(myranda)\nnot Mythologic(hermann)\nSickening(hermann)\nforall x (Sickening(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Rancorous(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Mythologic(x))\nforall x (Rancorous(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Sickening(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and not Mythologic(x) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Endowed(x) and not Mythologic(x) -> Constant(x))\nforall x (Sickening(x) and Mythologic(x) -> Unedited(x))\nforall x (Constant(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Unedited(x))\nforall x (Mythologic(x) -> Unedited(x))\n\nnot Sickening(gerard)\n\nRancorous(gerard) and not Endowed(gerard) and forall x (Rancorous(x) and not Endowed(x) -> Sickening(x)) -> therefore Sickening(gerard)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Ilse is not granular. Ilse is luxe. Hussein is granular. Hussein is scurvy. Hussein is digressive. Hussein is baric. Rem is curvaceous. Rem is digressive. Suzanna is not curvaceous. Suzanna is scurvy. If something is scurvy and not granular then it is luxe. If something is scurvy and not granular then it is curvaceous. If something is luxe and not granular then it is scurvy. If something is scurvy and not curvaceous then it is digressive. If something is granular and not curvaceous then it is digressive. All scurvy, curvaceous things are baric. If something is digressive and not granular then it is baric. If something is curvaceous then it is baric. Ilse is curvaceous.", "logic": "\nnot Granular(ilse)\nLuxe(ilse)\nGranular(hussein)\nScurvy(hussein)\nDigressive(hussein)\nBaric(hussein)\nCurvaceous(rem)\nDigressive(rem)\nnot Curvaceous(suzanna)\nScurvy(suzanna)\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and not Granular(x) -> Luxe(x))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and not Granular(x) -> Curvaceous(x))\nforall x (Luxe(x) and not Granular(x) -> Scurvy(x))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and not Curvaceous(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Granular(x) and not Curvaceous(x) -> Digressive(x))\nforall x (Scurvy(x) and Curvaceous(x) -> Baric(x))\nforall x (Digressive(x) and not Granular(x) -> Baric(x))\nforall x (Curvaceous(x) -> Baric(x))\n\nCurvaceous(ilse)\n\nLuxe(ilse) and not Granular(ilse) and forall x (Luxe(x) and not Granular(x) -> Scurvy(x)) -> therefore Scurvy(ilse) Scurvy(ilse) and not Granular(ilse) and forall x (Scurvy(x) and not Granular(x) -> Curvaceous(x)) -> therefore Curvaceous(ilse)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Gillan is not alienating. Gillan is strident. Georgiana is alienating. Georgiana is subdued. Georgiana is anile. Georgiana is ignored. Elvera is protozoic. Elvera is anile. Inglebert is not protozoic. Inglebert is subdued. If something is subdued and not alienating then it is strident. If something is subdued and not alienating then it is protozoic. If something is strident and not alienating then it is subdued. If something is subdued and not protozoic then it is anile. If something is alienating and not protozoic then it is anile. All subdued, protozoic things are ignored. If something is anile and not alienating then it is ignored. If something is protozoic then it is ignored. Gillan is not protozoic.", "logic": "\nnot Alienating(gillan)\nStrident(gillan)\nAlienating(georgiana)\nSubdued(georgiana)\nAnile(georgiana)\nIgnored(georgiana)\nProtozoic(elvera)\nAnile(elvera)\nnot Protozoic(inglebert)\nSubdued(inglebert)\nforall x (Subdued(x) and not Alienating(x) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) and not Alienating(x) -> Protozoic(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) and not Alienating(x) -> Subdued(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) and not Protozoic(x) -> Anile(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) and not Protozoic(x) -> Anile(x))\nforall x (Subdued(x) and Protozoic(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Anile(x) and not Alienating(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Protozoic(x) -> Ignored(x))\n\nnot Protozoic(gillan)\n\nStrident(gillan) and not Alienating(gillan) and forall x (Strident(x) and not Alienating(x) -> Subdued(x)) -> therefore Subdued(gillan) Subdued(gillan) and not Alienating(gillan) and forall x (Subdued(x) and not Alienating(x) -> Protozoic(x)) -> therefore Protozoic(gillan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Karlen is not unlovely. Karlen is prussian. Dickey is unlovely. Dickey is timeworn. Dickey is miasmal. Dickey is commodious. Rourke is araneidan. Rourke is miasmal. Timotheus is not araneidan. Timotheus is timeworn. If something is timeworn and not unlovely then it is prussian. If something is timeworn and not unlovely then it is araneidan. If something is prussian and not unlovely then it is timeworn. If something is timeworn and not araneidan then it is miasmal. If something is unlovely and not araneidan then it is miasmal. All timeworn, araneidan things are commodious. If something is miasmal and not unlovely then it is commodious. If something is araneidan then it is commodious. Karlen is commodious.", "logic": "\nnot Unlovely(karlen)\nPrussian(karlen)\nUnlovely(dickey)\nTimeworn(dickey)\nMiasmal(dickey)\nCommodious(dickey)\nAraneidan(rourke)\nMiasmal(rourke)\nnot Araneidan(timotheus)\nTimeworn(timotheus)\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and not Unlovely(x) -> Prussian(x))\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and not Unlovely(x) -> Araneidan(x))\nforall x (Prussian(x) and not Unlovely(x) -> Timeworn(x))\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and not Araneidan(x) -> Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Unlovely(x) and not Araneidan(x) -> Miasmal(x))\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and Araneidan(x) -> Commodious(x))\nforall x (Miasmal(x) and not Unlovely(x) -> Commodious(x))\nforall x (Araneidan(x) -> Commodious(x))\n\nCommodious(karlen)\n\nPrussian(karlen) and not Unlovely(karlen) and forall x (Prussian(x) and not Unlovely(x) -> Timeworn(x)) -> therefore Timeworn(karlen) Timeworn(karlen) and not Unlovely(karlen) and forall x (Timeworn(x) and not Unlovely(x) -> Araneidan(x)) -> therefore Araneidan(karlen) Araneidan(karlen) and forall x (Araneidan(x) -> Commodious(x)) -> therefore Commodious(karlen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Robbi is not civilized. Robbi is mensurable. Norry is civilized. Norry is lexical. Norry is oddish. Norry is blame. Trixy is available. Trixy is oddish. Charissa is not available. Charissa is lexical. If something is lexical and not civilized then it is mensurable. If something is lexical and not civilized then it is available. If something is mensurable and not civilized then it is lexical. If something is lexical and not available then it is oddish. If something is civilized and not available then it is oddish. All lexical, available things are blame. If something is oddish and not civilized then it is blame. If something is available then it is blame. Robbi is not blame.", "logic": "\nnot Civilized(robbi)\nMensurable(robbi)\nCivilized(norry)\nLexical(norry)\nOddish(norry)\nBlame(norry)\nAvailable(trixy)\nOddish(trixy)\nnot Available(charissa)\nLexical(charissa)\nforall x (Lexical(x) and not Civilized(x) -> Mensurable(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) and not Civilized(x) -> Available(x))\nforall x (Mensurable(x) and not Civilized(x) -> Lexical(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) and not Available(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Civilized(x) and not Available(x) -> Oddish(x))\nforall x (Lexical(x) and Available(x) -> Blame(x))\nforall x (Oddish(x) and not Civilized(x) -> Blame(x))\nforall x (Available(x) -> Blame(x))\n\nnot Blame(robbi)\n\nMensurable(robbi) and not Civilized(robbi) and forall x (Mensurable(x) and not Civilized(x) -> Lexical(x)) -> therefore Lexical(robbi) Lexical(robbi) and not Civilized(robbi) and forall x (Lexical(x) and not Civilized(x) -> Available(x)) -> therefore Available(robbi) Available(robbi) and forall x (Available(x) -> Blame(x)) -> therefore Blame(robbi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Myna is not symmetric. Myna is canadian. Lawerence is symmetric. Lawerence is deathless. Lawerence is unifoliate. Lawerence is dextrorsal. Torrey is epizoan. Torrey is unifoliate. Ann is not epizoan. Ann is deathless. If something is deathless and not symmetric then it is canadian. If something is deathless and not symmetric then it is epizoan. If something is canadian and not symmetric then it is deathless. If something is deathless and not epizoan then it is unifoliate. If something is symmetric and not epizoan then it is unifoliate. All deathless, epizoan things are dextrorsal. If something is unifoliate and not symmetric then it is dextrorsal. If something is epizoan then it is dextrorsal. Torrey is not deathless.", "logic": "\nnot Symmetric(myna)\nCanadian(myna)\nSymmetric(lawerence)\nDeathless(lawerence)\nUnifoliate(lawerence)\nDextrorsal(lawerence)\nEpizoan(torrey)\nUnifoliate(torrey)\nnot Epizoan(ann)\nDeathless(ann)\nforall x (Deathless(x) and not Symmetric(x) -> Canadian(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) and not Symmetric(x) -> Epizoan(x))\nforall x (Canadian(x) and not Symmetric(x) -> Deathless(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) and not Epizoan(x) -> Unifoliate(x))\nforall x (Symmetric(x) and not Epizoan(x) -> Unifoliate(x))\nforall x (Deathless(x) and Epizoan(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\nforall x (Unifoliate(x) and not Symmetric(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\nforall x (Epizoan(x) -> Dextrorsal(x))\n\nnot Deathless(torrey)\n\nforall x (Canadian(x) and not Symmetric(x) -> Deathless(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Wilone is not revised. Wilone is aching. Collin is revised. Collin is carpellary. Collin is demode. Collin is mourning. Noelani is spongelike. Noelani is demode. Kaiser is not spongelike. Kaiser is carpellary. If something is carpellary and not revised then it is aching. If something is carpellary and not revised then it is spongelike. If something is aching and not revised then it is carpellary. If something is carpellary and not spongelike then it is demode. If something is revised and not spongelike then it is demode. All carpellary, spongelike things are mourning. If something is demode and not revised then it is mourning. If something is spongelike then it is mourning. Collin is spongelike.", "logic": "\nnot Revised(wilone)\nAching(wilone)\nRevised(collin)\nCarpellary(collin)\nDemode(collin)\nMourning(collin)\nSpongelike(noelani)\nDemode(noelani)\nnot Spongelike(kaiser)\nCarpellary(kaiser)\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and not Revised(x) -> Aching(x))\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and not Revised(x) -> Spongelike(x))\nforall x (Aching(x) and not Revised(x) -> Carpellary(x))\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and not Spongelike(x) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Revised(x) and not Spongelike(x) -> Demode(x))\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and Spongelike(x) -> Mourning(x))\nforall x (Demode(x) and not Revised(x) -> Mourning(x))\nforall x (Spongelike(x) -> Mourning(x))\n\nSpongelike(collin)\n\nforall x (Carpellary(x) and not Revised(x) -> Spongelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Genvieve is not homebound. Genvieve is parted. Gallagher is homebound. Gallagher is binuclear. Gallagher is brachiate. Gallagher is drizzling. Martie is falling. Martie is brachiate. Erda is not falling. Erda is binuclear. If something is binuclear and not homebound then it is parted. If something is binuclear and not homebound then it is falling. If something is parted and not homebound then it is binuclear. If something is binuclear and not falling then it is brachiate. If something is homebound and not falling then it is brachiate. All binuclear, falling things are drizzling. If something is brachiate and not homebound then it is drizzling. If something is falling then it is drizzling. Erda is not drizzling.", "logic": "\nnot Homebound(genvieve)\nParted(genvieve)\nHomebound(gallagher)\nBinuclear(gallagher)\nBrachiate(gallagher)\nDrizzling(gallagher)\nFalling(martie)\nBrachiate(martie)\nnot Falling(erda)\nBinuclear(erda)\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and not Homebound(x) -> Parted(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and not Homebound(x) -> Falling(x))\nforall x (Parted(x) and not Homebound(x) -> Binuclear(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and not Falling(x) -> Brachiate(x))\nforall x (Homebound(x) and not Falling(x) -> Brachiate(x))\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and Falling(x) -> Drizzling(x))\nforall x (Brachiate(x) and not Homebound(x) -> Drizzling(x))\nforall x (Falling(x) -> Drizzling(x))\n\nnot Drizzling(erda)\n\nforall x (Binuclear(x) and Falling(x) -> Drizzling(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Vinni is not omniscient. Vinni is epidermic. Giana is omniscient. Giana is vaulted. Giana is modified. Giana is disclike. Leone is aghast. Leone is modified. Brunhilda is not aghast. Brunhilda is vaulted. If something is vaulted and not omniscient then it is epidermic. If something is vaulted and not omniscient then it is aghast. If something is epidermic and not omniscient then it is vaulted. If something is vaulted and not aghast then it is modified. If something is omniscient and not aghast then it is modified. All vaulted, aghast things are disclike. If something is modified and not omniscient then it is disclike. If something is aghast then it is disclike. Brunhilda is epidermic.", "logic": "\nnot Omniscient(vinni)\nEpidermic(vinni)\nOmniscient(giana)\nVaulted(giana)\nModified(giana)\nDisclike(giana)\nAghast(leone)\nModified(leone)\nnot Aghast(brunhilda)\nVaulted(brunhilda)\nforall x (Vaulted(x) and not Omniscient(x) -> Epidermic(x))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) and not Omniscient(x) -> Aghast(x))\nforall x (Epidermic(x) and not Omniscient(x) -> Vaulted(x))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) and not Aghast(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Omniscient(x) and not Aghast(x) -> Modified(x))\nforall x (Vaulted(x) and Aghast(x) -> Disclike(x))\nforall x (Modified(x) and not Omniscient(x) -> Disclike(x))\nforall x (Aghast(x) -> Disclike(x))\n\nEpidermic(brunhilda)\n\nforall x (Vaulted(x) and not Omniscient(x) -> Epidermic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Waldemar is not stewed. Waldemar is provoked. Julianna is stewed. Julianna is bloody. Julianna is spatial. Julianna is casual. Gerti is parked. Gerti is spatial. Lynde is not parked. Lynde is bloody. If something is bloody and not stewed then it is provoked. If something is bloody and not stewed then it is parked. If something is provoked and not stewed then it is bloody. If something is bloody and not parked then it is spatial. If something is stewed and not parked then it is spatial. All bloody, parked things are casual. If something is spatial and not stewed then it is casual. If something is parked then it is casual. Gerti is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Stewed(waldemar)\nProvoked(waldemar)\nStewed(julianna)\nBloody(julianna)\nSpatial(julianna)\nCasual(julianna)\nParked(gerti)\nSpatial(gerti)\nnot Parked(lynde)\nBloody(lynde)\nforall x (Bloody(x) and not Stewed(x) -> Provoked(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and not Stewed(x) -> Parked(x))\nforall x (Provoked(x) and not Stewed(x) -> Bloody(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and not Parked(x) -> Spatial(x))\nforall x (Stewed(x) and not Parked(x) -> Spatial(x))\nforall x (Bloody(x) and Parked(x) -> Casual(x))\nforall x (Spatial(x) and not Stewed(x) -> Casual(x))\nforall x (Parked(x) -> Casual(x))\n\nnot Round(gerti)\n\nnot Round(gerti) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Goldie is not unnumbered. Goldie is pejorative. Lorianna is unnumbered. Lorianna is unwilled. Lorianna is inapposite. Lorianna is harmonical. Fulvia is exogamous. Fulvia is inapposite. Rolfe is not exogamous. Rolfe is unwilled. If something is unwilled and not unnumbered then it is pejorative. If something is unwilled and not unnumbered then it is exogamous. If something is pejorative and not unnumbered then it is unwilled. If something is unwilled and not exogamous then it is inapposite. If something is unnumbered and not exogamous then it is inapposite. All unwilled, exogamous things are harmonical. If something is inapposite and not unnumbered then it is harmonical. If something is exogamous then it is harmonical. Rolfe is unnumbered.", "logic": "\nnot Unnumbered(goldie)\nPejorative(goldie)\nUnnumbered(lorianna)\nUnwilled(lorianna)\nInapposite(lorianna)\nHarmonical(lorianna)\nExogamous(fulvia)\nInapposite(fulvia)\nnot Exogamous(rolfe)\nUnwilled(rolfe)\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and not Unnumbered(x) -> Pejorative(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and not Unnumbered(x) -> Exogamous(x))\nforall x (Pejorative(x) and not Unnumbered(x) -> Unwilled(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and not Exogamous(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Unnumbered(x) and not Exogamous(x) -> Inapposite(x))\nforall x (Unwilled(x) and Exogamous(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Inapposite(x) and not Unnumbered(x) -> Harmonical(x))\nforall x (Exogamous(x) -> Harmonical(x))\n\nUnnumbered(rolfe)\n\nUnnumbered(rolfe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Janene is not insidious. Janene is untuneful. Edithe is insidious. Edithe is dampish. Edithe is annalistic. Edithe is worthwhile. Judah is tripartite. Judah is annalistic. Michaella is not tripartite. Michaella is dampish. If something is dampish and not insidious then it is untuneful. If something is dampish and not insidious then it is tripartite. If something is untuneful and not insidious then it is dampish. If something is dampish and not tripartite then it is annalistic. If something is insidious and not tripartite then it is annalistic. All dampish, tripartite things are worthwhile. If something is annalistic and not insidious then it is worthwhile. If something is tripartite then it is worthwhile. Edithe is not round.", "logic": "\nnot Insidious(janene)\nUntuneful(janene)\nInsidious(edithe)\nDampish(edithe)\nAnnalistic(edithe)\nWorthwhile(edithe)\nTripartite(judah)\nAnnalistic(judah)\nnot Tripartite(michaella)\nDampish(michaella)\nforall x (Dampish(x) and not Insidious(x) -> Untuneful(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and not Insidious(x) -> Tripartite(x))\nforall x (Untuneful(x) and not Insidious(x) -> Dampish(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and not Tripartite(x) -> Annalistic(x))\nforall x (Insidious(x) and not Tripartite(x) -> Annalistic(x))\nforall x (Dampish(x) and Tripartite(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Annalistic(x) and not Insidious(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\nforall x (Tripartite(x) -> Worthwhile(x))\n\nnot Round(edithe)\n\nnot Round(edithe) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Kaari is not melanesian. Kaari is welcoming. Ramona is melanesian. Ramona is antacid. Ramona is standard. Ramona is calycine. Laurianne is disarrayed. Laurianne is standard. Libby is not disarrayed. Libby is antacid. If something is antacid and not melanesian then it is welcoming. If something is antacid and not melanesian then it is disarrayed. If something is welcoming and not melanesian then it is antacid. If something is antacid and not disarrayed then it is standard. If something is melanesian and not disarrayed then it is standard. All antacid, disarrayed things are calycine. If something is standard and not melanesian then it is calycine. If something is disarrayed then it is calycine. Libby is round.", "logic": "\nnot Melanesian(kaari)\nWelcoming(kaari)\nMelanesian(ramona)\nAntacid(ramona)\nStandard(ramona)\nCalycine(ramona)\nDisarrayed(laurianne)\nStandard(laurianne)\nnot Disarrayed(libby)\nAntacid(libby)\nforall x (Antacid(x) and not Melanesian(x) -> Welcoming(x))\nforall x (Antacid(x) and not Melanesian(x) -> Disarrayed(x))\nforall x (Welcoming(x) and not Melanesian(x) -> Antacid(x))\nforall x (Antacid(x) and not Disarrayed(x) -> Standard(x))\nforall x (Melanesian(x) and not Disarrayed(x) -> Standard(x))\nforall x (Antacid(x) and Disarrayed(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Standard(x) and not Melanesian(x) -> Calycine(x))\nforall x (Disarrayed(x) -> Calycine(x))\n\nRound(libby)\n\nRound(libby) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-595"} {"premises": "Mariya is curtained. Caesar is amiss. Annalisa is amiss. If something is amiss then it is junoesque. Smart, ruminant things are unoriginal. If something is amiss then it is seventieth. All junoesque things are curtained. If Caesar is ruminant and Caesar is leptorhine then Caesar is unoriginal. Cold things are leptorhine. Mariya is curtained.", "logic": "\nCurtained(mariya)\nAmiss(caesar)\nAmiss(annalisa)\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> Junoesque(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) and Ruminant(x) -> Unoriginal(x))\nforall x (Amiss(x) -> Seventieth(x))\nforall x (Junoesque(x) -> Curtained(x))\nRuminant(caesar) and Leptorhine(caesar) -> Unoriginal(caesar)\nforall x (Curtained(x) -> Leptorhine(x))\n\nCurtained(mariya)\n\ntherefore Curtained(mariya)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Reed is unfrozen. Jefferey is organised. Lanie is organised. If something is organised then it is different. Smart, external things are pulverized. If something is organised then it is unranked. All different things are unfrozen. If Jefferey is external and Jefferey is bastard then Jefferey is pulverized. Cold things are bastard. Jefferey is not organised.", "logic": "\nUnfrozen(reed)\nOrganised(jefferey)\nOrganised(lanie)\nforall x (Organised(x) -> Different(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) and External(x) -> Pulverized(x))\nforall x (Organised(x) -> Unranked(x))\nforall x (Different(x) -> Unfrozen(x))\nExternal(jefferey) and Bastard(jefferey) -> Pulverized(jefferey)\nforall x (Unfrozen(x) -> Bastard(x))\n\nnot Organised(jefferey)\n\ntherefore Organised(jefferey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Annalena is girlish. Tybie is helpful. Mimi is helpful. If something is helpful then it is avoidable. Smart, novel things are hypnotic. If something is helpful then it is corroded. All avoidable things are girlish. If Tybie is novel and Tybie is desultory then Tybie is hypnotic. Cold things are desultory. Tybie is avoidable.", "logic": "\nGirlish(annalena)\nHelpful(tybie)\nHelpful(mimi)\nforall x (Helpful(x) -> Avoidable(x))\nforall x (Helpful(x) and Novel(x) -> Hypnotic(x))\nforall x (Helpful(x) -> Corroded(x))\nforall x (Avoidable(x) -> Girlish(x))\nNovel(tybie) and Desultory(tybie) -> Hypnotic(tybie)\nforall x (Girlish(x) -> Desultory(x))\n\nAvoidable(tybie)\n\nHelpful(tybie) and forall x (Helpful(x) -> Avoidable(x)) -> therefore Avoidable(tybie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Kania is filar. Lorri is fulminant. Michell is fulminant. If something is fulminant then it is clawed. Smart, allophonic things are thinking. If something is fulminant then it is motherlike. All clawed things are filar. If Lorri is allophonic and Lorri is placeable then Lorri is thinking. Cold things are placeable. Lorri is not motherlike.", "logic": "\nFilar(kania)\nFulminant(lorri)\nFulminant(michell)\nforall x (Fulminant(x) -> Clawed(x))\nforall x (Fulminant(x) and Allophonic(x) -> Thinking(x))\nforall x (Fulminant(x) -> Motherlike(x))\nforall x (Clawed(x) -> Filar(x))\nAllophonic(lorri) and Placeable(lorri) -> Thinking(lorri)\nforall x (Filar(x) -> Placeable(x))\n\nnot Motherlike(lorri)\n\nFulminant(lorri) and forall x (Fulminant(x) -> Motherlike(x)) -> therefore Motherlike(lorri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Lane is armenian. Shimon is resolvable. Rana is resolvable. If something is resolvable then it is woolly. Smart, ohmic things are rushed. If something is resolvable then it is proscribed. All woolly things are armenian. If Shimon is ohmic and Shimon is unjointed then Shimon is rushed. Cold things are unjointed. Rana is armenian.", "logic": "\nArmenian(lane)\nResolvable(shimon)\nResolvable(rana)\nforall x (Resolvable(x) -> Woolly(x))\nforall x (Resolvable(x) and Ohmic(x) -> Rushed(x))\nforall x (Resolvable(x) -> Proscribed(x))\nforall x (Woolly(x) -> Armenian(x))\nOhmic(shimon) and Unjointed(shimon) -> Rushed(shimon)\nforall x (Armenian(x) -> Unjointed(x))\n\nArmenian(rana)\n\nResolvable(rana) and forall x (Resolvable(x) -> Woolly(x)) -> therefore Woolly(rana) Woolly(rana) and forall x (Woolly(x) -> Armenian(x)) -> therefore Armenian(rana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Saundra is idle. Vivie is dizygous. Linea is dizygous. If something is dizygous then it is ploughed. Smart, mutilated things are ascetic. If something is dizygous then it is affective. All ploughed things are idle. If Vivie is mutilated and Vivie is screechy then Vivie is ascetic. Cold things are screechy. Linea is not idle.", "logic": "\nIdle(saundra)\nDizygous(vivie)\nDizygous(linea)\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Ploughed(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) and Mutilated(x) -> Ascetic(x))\nforall x (Dizygous(x) -> Affective(x))\nforall x (Ploughed(x) -> Idle(x))\nMutilated(vivie) and Screechy(vivie) -> Ascetic(vivie)\nforall x (Idle(x) -> Screechy(x))\n\nnot Idle(linea)\n\nDizygous(linea) and forall x (Dizygous(x) -> Ploughed(x)) -> therefore Ploughed(linea) Ploughed(linea) and forall x (Ploughed(x) -> Idle(x)) -> therefore Idle(linea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Urban is shifting. Nona is noble. Randal is noble. If something is noble then it is every. Smart, swish things are bridal. If something is noble then it is false. All every things are shifting. If Nona is swish and Nona is intended then Nona is bridal. Cold things are intended. Randal is intended.", "logic": "\nShifting(urban)\nNoble(nona)\nNoble(randal)\nforall x (Noble(x) -> Every(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) and Swish(x) -> Bridal(x))\nforall x (Noble(x) -> False(x))\nforall x (Every(x) -> Shifting(x))\nSwish(nona) and Intended(nona) -> Bridal(nona)\nforall x (Shifting(x) -> Intended(x))\n\nIntended(randal)\n\nNoble(randal) and forall x (Noble(x) -> Every(x)) -> therefore Every(randal) Every(randal) and forall x (Every(x) -> Shifting(x)) -> therefore Shifting(randal) Shifting(randal) and forall x (Shifting(x) -> Intended(x)) -> therefore Intended(randal)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Ehud is palmar. Sibella is demagogic. Trace is demagogic. If something is demagogic then it is loverly. Smart, specious things are vaulting. If something is demagogic then it is antitank. All loverly things are palmar. If Sibella is specious and Sibella is four then Sibella is vaulting. Cold things are four. Trace is not four.", "logic": "\nPalmar(ehud)\nDemagogic(sibella)\nDemagogic(trace)\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Loverly(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) and Specious(x) -> Vaulting(x))\nforall x (Demagogic(x) -> Antitank(x))\nforall x (Loverly(x) -> Palmar(x))\nSpecious(sibella) and Four(sibella) -> Vaulting(sibella)\nforall x (Palmar(x) -> Four(x))\n\nnot Four(trace)\n\nDemagogic(trace) and forall x (Demagogic(x) -> Loverly(x)) -> therefore Loverly(trace) Loverly(trace) and forall x (Loverly(x) -> Palmar(x)) -> therefore Palmar(trace) Palmar(trace) and forall x (Palmar(x) -> Four(x)) -> therefore Four(trace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Preston is smelly. Freddy is confirming. Corbin is confirming. If something is confirming then it is cheering. Smart, inlaid things are unadorned. If something is confirming then it is offensive. All cheering things are smelly. If Freddy is inlaid and Freddy is mixed then Freddy is unadorned. Cold things are mixed. Freddy is not unadorned.", "logic": "\nSmelly(preston)\nConfirming(freddy)\nConfirming(corbin)\nforall x (Confirming(x) -> Cheering(x))\nforall x (Confirming(x) and Inlaid(x) -> Unadorned(x))\nforall x (Confirming(x) -> Offensive(x))\nforall x (Cheering(x) -> Smelly(x))\nInlaid(freddy) and Mixed(freddy) -> Unadorned(freddy)\nforall x (Smelly(x) -> Mixed(x))\n\nnot Unadorned(freddy)\n\nforall x (Confirming(x) and Inlaid(x) -> Unadorned(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Idalia is barbarian. Skippie is chordate. Bettye is chordate. If something is chordate then it is truncated. Smart, anodal things are oxidized. If something is chordate then it is imprecise. All truncated things are barbarian. If Skippie is anodal and Skippie is chylific then Skippie is oxidized. Cold things are chylific. Idalia is oxidized.", "logic": "\nBarbarian(idalia)\nChordate(skippie)\nChordate(bettye)\nforall x (Chordate(x) -> Truncated(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Anodal(x) -> Oxidized(x))\nforall x (Chordate(x) -> Imprecise(x))\nforall x (Truncated(x) -> Barbarian(x))\nAnodal(skippie) and Chylific(skippie) -> Oxidized(skippie)\nforall x (Barbarian(x) -> Chylific(x))\n\nOxidized(idalia)\n\nforall x (Chordate(x) and Anodal(x) -> Oxidized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Gilberta is menial. Vinnie is rabbinical. Virginie is rabbinical. If something is rabbinical then it is abeyant. Smart, straining things are unsaleable. If something is rabbinical then it is heritable. All abeyant things are menial. If Vinnie is straining and Vinnie is weakening then Vinnie is unsaleable. Cold things are weakening. Virginie is not unsaleable.", "logic": "\nMenial(gilberta)\nRabbinical(vinnie)\nRabbinical(virginie)\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Abeyant(x))\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) and Straining(x) -> Unsaleable(x))\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) -> Heritable(x))\nforall x (Abeyant(x) -> Menial(x))\nStraining(vinnie) and Weakening(vinnie) -> Unsaleable(vinnie)\nforall x (Menial(x) -> Weakening(x))\n\nnot Unsaleable(virginie)\n\nforall x (Rabbinical(x) and Straining(x) -> Unsaleable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Madelle is pilous. Ola is pessimum. Wes is pessimum. If something is pessimum then it is undraped. Smart, affiliated things are storeyed. If something is pessimum then it is indocile. All undraped things are pilous. If Ola is affiliated and Ola is ossified then Ola is storeyed. Cold things are ossified. Madelle is indocile.", "logic": "\nPilous(madelle)\nPessimum(ola)\nPessimum(wes)\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Undraped(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) and Affiliated(x) -> Storeyed(x))\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Indocile(x))\nforall x (Undraped(x) -> Pilous(x))\nAffiliated(ola) and Ossified(ola) -> Storeyed(ola)\nforall x (Pilous(x) -> Ossified(x))\n\nIndocile(madelle)\n\nforall x (Pessimum(x) -> Indocile(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Wait is pellucid. Courtney is dented. Jayme is dented. If something is dented then it is seeming. Smart, fastidious things are dressed. If something is dented then it is unengaged. All seeming things are pellucid. If Courtney is fastidious and Courtney is forcipate then Courtney is dressed. Cold things are forcipate. Jayme is not fastidious.", "logic": "\nPellucid(wait)\nDented(courtney)\nDented(jayme)\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Seeming(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) and Fastidious(x) -> Dressed(x))\nforall x (Dented(x) -> Unengaged(x))\nforall x (Seeming(x) -> Pellucid(x))\nFastidious(courtney) and Forcipate(courtney) -> Dressed(courtney)\nforall x (Pellucid(x) -> Forcipate(x))\n\nnot Fastidious(jayme)\n\nnot Fastidious(jayme) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Tobias is bushy. Rayna is daylong. Norman is daylong. If something is daylong then it is wanton. Smart, soughing things are premiere. If something is daylong then it is apnoeic. All wanton things are bushy. If Rayna is soughing and Rayna is occlusive then Rayna is premiere. Cold things are occlusive. Tobias is daylong.", "logic": "\nBushy(tobias)\nDaylong(rayna)\nDaylong(norman)\nforall x (Daylong(x) -> Wanton(x))\nforall x (Daylong(x) and Soughing(x) -> Premiere(x))\nforall x (Daylong(x) -> Apnoeic(x))\nforall x (Wanton(x) -> Bushy(x))\nSoughing(rayna) and Occlusive(rayna) -> Premiere(rayna)\nforall x (Bushy(x) -> Occlusive(x))\n\nDaylong(tobias)\n\nDaylong(tobias) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Selie is foliolate. Tabor is vermiform. Sidonnie is vermiform. If something is vermiform then it is gluttonous. Smart, brickly things are bossy. If something is vermiform then it is libelous. All gluttonous things are foliolate. If Tabor is brickly and Tabor is robotic then Tabor is bossy. Cold things are robotic. Tabor is not brickly.", "logic": "\nFoliolate(selie)\nVermiform(tabor)\nVermiform(sidonnie)\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Gluttonous(x))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) and Brickly(x) -> Bossy(x))\nforall x (Vermiform(x) -> Libelous(x))\nforall x (Gluttonous(x) -> Foliolate(x))\nBrickly(tabor) and Robotic(tabor) -> Bossy(tabor)\nforall x (Foliolate(x) -> Robotic(x))\n\nnot Brickly(tabor)\n\nnot Brickly(tabor) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "Leonore is gobsmacked. Jessika is contrasty. Claribel is contrasty. If something is contrasty then it is biserrate. Smart, dutiful things are cornered. If something is contrasty then it is hydrated. All biserrate things are gobsmacked. If Jessika is dutiful and Jessika is licensed then Jessika is cornered. Cold things are licensed. Leonore is dutiful.", "logic": "\nGobsmacked(leonore)\nContrasty(jessika)\nContrasty(claribel)\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Biserrate(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) and Dutiful(x) -> Cornered(x))\nforall x (Contrasty(x) -> Hydrated(x))\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> Gobsmacked(x))\nDutiful(jessika) and Licensed(jessika) -> Cornered(jessika)\nforall x (Gobsmacked(x) -> Licensed(x))\n\nDutiful(leonore)\n\nDutiful(leonore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1853"} {"premises": "The pietro unloosen the beale. The beale is untidy. If the pietro is polemic and the pietro unloosen the beale then the pietro bastardise the beale. If something is polemic then it unloosen the pietro. If something bastardise the beale then it bastardise the pietro. If the pietro is polemic then the pietro unloosen the beale. If something is untidy and carboxyl then it bastardise the pietro. If something unloosen the beale then it is polemic. If something bastardise the beale then it is carboxyl. If something bastardise the pietro then the pietro housekeep the beale. The pietro unloosen the beale.", "logic": "\nUnloosen(pietro, beale)\nUntidy(beale)\nPolemic(pietro) and Unloosen(pietro, beale) -> Bastardise(pietro, beale)\nforall x (Polemic(x) -> Unloosen(x, pietro))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, beale) -> Bastardise(x, pietro))\nPolemic(pietro) -> Unloosen(pietro, beale)\nforall x (Untidy(x) and Carboxyl(x) -> Bastardise(x, pietro))\nforall x (Unloosen(x, beale) -> Polemic(x))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, beale) -> Carboxyl(x))\nforall x (Bastardise(x, pietro) -> Housekeep(pietro, beale))\n\nUnloosen(pietro, beale)\n\ntherefore Unloosen(pietro, beale)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The benoite halt the florian. The florian is marvelous. If the benoite is arminian and the benoite halt the florian then the benoite defeat the florian. If something is arminian then it halt the benoite. If something defeat the florian then it defeat the benoite. If the benoite is arminian then the benoite halt the florian. If something is marvelous and protanopic then it defeat the benoite. If something halt the florian then it is arminian. If something defeat the florian then it is protanopic. If something defeat the benoite then the benoite upstage the florian. The florian is not marvelous.", "logic": "\nHalt(benoite, florian)\nMarvelous(florian)\nArminian(benoite) and Halt(benoite, florian) -> Defeat(benoite, florian)\nforall x (Arminian(x) -> Halt(x, benoite))\nforall x (Defeat(x, florian) -> Defeat(x, benoite))\nArminian(benoite) -> Halt(benoite, florian)\nforall x (Marvelous(x) and Protanopic(x) -> Defeat(x, benoite))\nforall x (Halt(x, florian) -> Arminian(x))\nforall x (Defeat(x, florian) -> Protanopic(x))\nforall x (Defeat(x, benoite) -> Upstage(benoite, florian))\n\nnot Marvelous(florian)\n\ntherefore Marvelous(florian)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The jennifer collogue the natka. The natka is epidermic. If the jennifer is tokenish and the jennifer collogue the natka then the jennifer whiteout the natka. If something is tokenish then it collogue the jennifer. If something whiteout the natka then it whiteout the jennifer. If the jennifer is tokenish then the jennifer collogue the natka. If something is epidermic and logy then it whiteout the jennifer. If something collogue the natka then it is tokenish. If something whiteout the natka then it is logy. If something whiteout the jennifer then the jennifer immure the natka. The jennifer is tokenish.", "logic": "\nCollogue(jennifer, natka)\nEpidermic(natka)\nTokenish(jennifer) and Collogue(jennifer, natka) -> Whiteout(jennifer, natka)\nforall x (Tokenish(x) -> Collogue(x, jennifer))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, natka) -> Whiteout(x, jennifer))\nTokenish(jennifer) -> Collogue(jennifer, natka)\nforall x (Epidermic(x) and Logy(x) -> Whiteout(x, jennifer))\nforall x (Collogue(x, natka) -> Tokenish(x))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, natka) -> Logy(x))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, jennifer) -> Immure(jennifer, natka))\n\nTokenish(jennifer)\n\nCollogue(jennifer, natka) and forall x (Collogue(x, natka) -> Tokenish(x)) -> therefore Tokenish(jennifer)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The sholom kibitz the jerome. The jerome is appositive. If the sholom is pure and the sholom kibitz the jerome then the sholom skylark the jerome. If something is pure then it kibitz the sholom. If something skylark the jerome then it skylark the sholom. If the sholom is pure then the sholom kibitz the jerome. If something is appositive and effusive then it skylark the sholom. If something kibitz the jerome then it is pure. If something skylark the jerome then it is effusive. If something skylark the sholom then the sholom greet the jerome. The sholom is not pure.", "logic": "\nKibitz(sholom, jerome)\nAppositive(jerome)\nPure(sholom) and Kibitz(sholom, jerome) -> Skylark(sholom, jerome)\nforall x (Pure(x) -> Kibitz(x, sholom))\nforall x (Skylark(x, jerome) -> Skylark(x, sholom))\nPure(sholom) -> Kibitz(sholom, jerome)\nforall x (Appositive(x) and Effusive(x) -> Skylark(x, sholom))\nforall x (Kibitz(x, jerome) -> Pure(x))\nforall x (Skylark(x, jerome) -> Effusive(x))\nforall x (Skylark(x, sholom) -> Greet(sholom, jerome))\n\nnot Pure(sholom)\n\nKibitz(sholom, jerome) and forall x (Kibitz(x, jerome) -> Pure(x)) -> therefore Pure(sholom)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The renell endure the max. The max is pinched. If the renell is asterisked and the renell endure the max then the renell burn the max. If something is asterisked then it endure the renell. If something burn the max then it burn the renell. If the renell is asterisked then the renell endure the max. If something is pinched and unstudious then it burn the renell. If something endure the max then it is asterisked. If something burn the max then it is unstudious. If something burn the renell then the renell exile the max. The renell burn the max.", "logic": "\nEndure(renell, max)\nPinched(max)\nAsterisked(renell) and Endure(renell, max) -> Burn(renell, max)\nforall x (Asterisked(x) -> Endure(x, renell))\nforall x (Burn(x, max) -> Burn(x, renell))\nAsterisked(renell) -> Endure(renell, max)\nforall x (Pinched(x) and Unstudious(x) -> Burn(x, renell))\nforall x (Endure(x, max) -> Asterisked(x))\nforall x (Burn(x, max) -> Unstudious(x))\nforall x (Burn(x, renell) -> Exile(renell, max))\n\nBurn(renell, max)\n\nEndure(renell, max) and forall x (Endure(x, max) -> Asterisked(x)) -> therefore Asterisked(renell) Asterisked(renell) and Endure(renell, max) and Asterisked(renell) and Endure(renell, max) -> Burn(renell, max) -> therefore Burn(renell, max)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The goldarina pervert the mora. The mora is gilded. If the goldarina is euphonious and the goldarina pervert the mora then the goldarina assort the mora. If something is euphonious then it pervert the goldarina. If something assort the mora then it assort the goldarina. If the goldarina is euphonious then the goldarina pervert the mora. If something is gilded and concessive then it assort the goldarina. If something pervert the mora then it is euphonious. If something assort the mora then it is concessive. If something assort the goldarina then the goldarina woolgather the mora. The goldarina does not like the mora.", "logic": "\nPervert(goldarina, mora)\nGilded(mora)\nEuphonious(goldarina) and Pervert(goldarina, mora) -> Assort(goldarina, mora)\nforall x (Euphonious(x) -> Pervert(x, goldarina))\nforall x (Assort(x, mora) -> Assort(x, goldarina))\nEuphonious(goldarina) -> Pervert(goldarina, mora)\nforall x (Gilded(x) and Concessive(x) -> Assort(x, goldarina))\nforall x (Pervert(x, mora) -> Euphonious(x))\nforall x (Assort(x, mora) -> Concessive(x))\nforall x (Assort(x, goldarina) -> Woolgather(goldarina, mora))\n\nnot Assort(goldarina, mora)\n\nPervert(goldarina, mora) and forall x (Pervert(x, mora) -> Euphonious(x)) -> therefore Euphonious(goldarina) Euphonious(goldarina) and Pervert(goldarina, mora) and Euphonious(goldarina) and Pervert(goldarina, mora) -> Assort(goldarina, mora) -> therefore Assort(goldarina, mora)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The shawna reprint the daniel. The daniel is stomatous. If the shawna is esoteric and the shawna reprint the daniel then the shawna terrasse the daniel. If something is esoteric then it reprint the shawna. If something terrasse the daniel then it terrasse the shawna. If the shawna is esoteric then the shawna reprint the daniel. If something is stomatous and vital then it terrasse the shawna. If something reprint the daniel then it is esoteric. If something terrasse the daniel then it is vital. If something terrasse the shawna then the shawna incurvate the daniel. The shawna is vital.", "logic": "\nReprint(shawna, daniel)\nStomatous(daniel)\nEsoteric(shawna) and Reprint(shawna, daniel) -> Terrasse(shawna, daniel)\nforall x (Esoteric(x) -> Reprint(x, shawna))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, daniel) -> Terrasse(x, shawna))\nEsoteric(shawna) -> Reprint(shawna, daniel)\nforall x (Stomatous(x) and Vital(x) -> Terrasse(x, shawna))\nforall x (Reprint(x, daniel) -> Esoteric(x))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, daniel) -> Vital(x))\nforall x (Terrasse(x, shawna) -> Incurvate(shawna, daniel))\n\nVital(shawna)\n\nReprint(shawna, daniel) and forall x (Reprint(x, daniel) -> Esoteric(x)) -> therefore Esoteric(shawna) Esoteric(shawna) and Reprint(shawna, daniel) and Esoteric(shawna) and Reprint(shawna, daniel) -> Terrasse(shawna, daniel) -> therefore Terrasse(shawna, daniel) Terrasse(shawna, daniel) and forall x (Terrasse(x, daniel) -> Vital(x)) -> therefore Vital(shawna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The roscoe daub the terrence. The terrence is swaybacked. If the roscoe is annoyed and the roscoe daub the terrence then the roscoe summerize the terrence. If something is annoyed then it daub the roscoe. If something summerize the terrence then it summerize the roscoe. If the roscoe is annoyed then the roscoe daub the terrence. If something is swaybacked and innumerous then it summerize the roscoe. If something daub the terrence then it is annoyed. If something summerize the terrence then it is innumerous. If something summerize the roscoe then the roscoe wedel the terrence. The roscoe does not like the roscoe.", "logic": "\nDaub(roscoe, terrence)\nSwaybacked(terrence)\nAnnoyed(roscoe) and Daub(roscoe, terrence) -> Summerize(roscoe, terrence)\nforall x (Annoyed(x) -> Daub(x, roscoe))\nforall x (Summerize(x, terrence) -> Summerize(x, roscoe))\nAnnoyed(roscoe) -> Daub(roscoe, terrence)\nforall x (Swaybacked(x) and Innumerous(x) -> Summerize(x, roscoe))\nforall x (Daub(x, terrence) -> Annoyed(x))\nforall x (Summerize(x, terrence) -> Innumerous(x))\nforall x (Summerize(x, roscoe) -> Wedel(roscoe, terrence))\n\nnot Summerize(roscoe, roscoe)\n\nDaub(roscoe, terrence) and forall x (Daub(x, terrence) -> Annoyed(x)) -> therefore Annoyed(roscoe) Annoyed(roscoe) and Daub(roscoe, terrence) and Annoyed(roscoe) and Daub(roscoe, terrence) -> Summerize(roscoe, terrence) -> therefore Summerize(roscoe, terrence) Summerize(roscoe, terrence) and forall x (Summerize(x, terrence) -> Summerize(x, roscoe)) -> therefore Summerize(roscoe, roscoe)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The katey refuel the barn. The barn is disparate. If the katey is offshore and the katey refuel the barn then the katey abrase the barn. If something is offshore then it refuel the katey. If something abrase the barn then it abrase the katey. If the katey is offshore then the katey refuel the barn. If something is disparate and sorrel then it abrase the katey. If something refuel the barn then it is offshore. If something abrase the barn then it is sorrel. If something abrase the katey then the katey brecciate the barn. The barn is not offshore.", "logic": "\nRefuel(katey, barn)\nDisparate(barn)\nOffshore(katey) and Refuel(katey, barn) -> Abrase(katey, barn)\nforall x (Offshore(x) -> Refuel(x, katey))\nforall x (Abrase(x, barn) -> Abrase(x, katey))\nOffshore(katey) -> Refuel(katey, barn)\nforall x (Disparate(x) and Sorrel(x) -> Abrase(x, katey))\nforall x (Refuel(x, barn) -> Offshore(x))\nforall x (Abrase(x, barn) -> Sorrel(x))\nforall x (Abrase(x, katey) -> Brecciate(katey, barn))\n\nnot Offshore(barn)\n\nforall x (Refuel(x, barn) -> Offshore(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The gladi straighten the noelle. The noelle is connate. If the gladi is preanal and the gladi straighten the noelle then the gladi wail the noelle. If something is preanal then it straighten the gladi. If something wail the noelle then it wail the gladi. If the gladi is preanal then the gladi straighten the noelle. If something is connate and inexpiable then it wail the gladi. If something straighten the noelle then it is preanal. If something wail the noelle then it is inexpiable. If something wail the gladi then the gladi shuffle the noelle. The noelle is inexpiable.", "logic": "\nStraighten(gladi, noelle)\nConnate(noelle)\nPreanal(gladi) and Straighten(gladi, noelle) -> Wail(gladi, noelle)\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Straighten(x, gladi))\nforall x (Wail(x, noelle) -> Wail(x, gladi))\nPreanal(gladi) -> Straighten(gladi, noelle)\nforall x (Connate(x) and Inexpiable(x) -> Wail(x, gladi))\nforall x (Straighten(x, noelle) -> Preanal(x))\nforall x (Wail(x, noelle) -> Inexpiable(x))\nforall x (Wail(x, gladi) -> Shuffle(gladi, noelle))\n\nInexpiable(noelle)\n\nforall x (Wail(x, noelle) -> Inexpiable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The almire bore the tracy. The tracy is bowfront. If the almire is blurry and the almire bore the tracy then the almire unclothe the tracy. If something is blurry then it bore the almire. If something unclothe the tracy then it unclothe the almire. If the almire is blurry then the almire bore the tracy. If something is bowfront and neoclassic then it unclothe the almire. If something bore the tracy then it is blurry. If something unclothe the tracy then it is neoclassic. If something unclothe the almire then the almire delegate the tracy. The tracy does not like the almire.", "logic": "\nBore(almire, tracy)\nBowfront(tracy)\nBlurry(almire) and Bore(almire, tracy) -> Unclothe(almire, tracy)\nforall x (Blurry(x) -> Bore(x, almire))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, tracy) -> Unclothe(x, almire))\nBlurry(almire) -> Bore(almire, tracy)\nforall x (Bowfront(x) and Neoclassic(x) -> Unclothe(x, almire))\nforall x (Bore(x, tracy) -> Blurry(x))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, tracy) -> Neoclassic(x))\nforall x (Unclothe(x, almire) -> Delegate(almire, tracy))\n\nnot Unclothe(tracy, almire)\n\nforall x (Bowfront(x) and Neoclassic(x) -> Unclothe(x, almire)) <- forall x (Unclothe(x, tracy) -> Neoclassic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The chelsey miter the eben. The eben is biped. If the chelsey is derivable and the chelsey miter the eben then the chelsey combat the eben. If something is derivable then it miter the chelsey. If something combat the eben then it combat the chelsey. If the chelsey is derivable then the chelsey miter the eben. If something is biped and wistful then it combat the chelsey. If something miter the eben then it is derivable. If something combat the eben then it is wistful. If something combat the chelsey then the chelsey debar the eben. The eben miter the chelsey.", "logic": "\nMiter(chelsey, eben)\nBiped(eben)\nDerivable(chelsey) and Miter(chelsey, eben) -> Combat(chelsey, eben)\nforall x (Derivable(x) -> Miter(x, chelsey))\nforall x (Combat(x, eben) -> Combat(x, chelsey))\nDerivable(chelsey) -> Miter(chelsey, eben)\nforall x (Biped(x) and Wistful(x) -> Combat(x, chelsey))\nforall x (Miter(x, eben) -> Derivable(x))\nforall x (Combat(x, eben) -> Wistful(x))\nforall x (Combat(x, chelsey) -> Debar(chelsey, eben))\n\nMiter(eben, chelsey)\n\nforall x (Derivable(x) -> Miter(x, chelsey)) <- forall x (Miter(x, eben) -> Derivable(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The karlotte ogle the coleman. The coleman is cute. If the karlotte is majuscular and the karlotte ogle the coleman then the karlotte synthesise the coleman. If something is majuscular then it ogle the karlotte. If something synthesise the coleman then it synthesise the karlotte. If the karlotte is majuscular then the karlotte ogle the coleman. If something is cute and harried then it synthesise the karlotte. If something ogle the coleman then it is majuscular. If something synthesise the coleman then it is harried. If something synthesise the karlotte then the karlotte transude the coleman. The karlotte is not rough.", "logic": "\nOgle(karlotte, coleman)\nCute(coleman)\nMajuscular(karlotte) and Ogle(karlotte, coleman) -> Synthesise(karlotte, coleman)\nforall x (Majuscular(x) -> Ogle(x, karlotte))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, coleman) -> Synthesise(x, karlotte))\nMajuscular(karlotte) -> Ogle(karlotte, coleman)\nforall x (Cute(x) and Harried(x) -> Synthesise(x, karlotte))\nforall x (Ogle(x, coleman) -> Majuscular(x))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, coleman) -> Harried(x))\nforall x (Synthesise(x, karlotte) -> Transude(karlotte, coleman))\n\nnot Rough(karlotte)\n\nnot Rough(karlotte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The catherina sorcerize the lory. The lory is galvanic. If the catherina is apogamous and the catherina sorcerize the lory then the catherina true the lory. If something is apogamous then it sorcerize the catherina. If something true the lory then it true the catherina. If the catherina is apogamous then the catherina sorcerize the lory. If something is galvanic and alabaster then it true the catherina. If something sorcerize the lory then it is apogamous. If something true the lory then it is alabaster. If something true the catherina then the catherina sporulate the lory. The lory sporulate the catherina.", "logic": "\nSorcerize(catherina, lory)\nGalvanic(lory)\nApogamous(catherina) and Sorcerize(catherina, lory) -> True(catherina, lory)\nforall x (Apogamous(x) -> Sorcerize(x, catherina))\nforall x (True(x, lory) -> True(x, catherina))\nApogamous(catherina) -> Sorcerize(catherina, lory)\nforall x (Galvanic(x) and Alabaster(x) -> True(x, catherina))\nforall x (Sorcerize(x, lory) -> Apogamous(x))\nforall x (True(x, lory) -> Alabaster(x))\nforall x (True(x, catherina) -> Sporulate(catherina, lory))\n\nSporulate(lory, catherina)\n\nSporulate(lory, catherina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The taber retrace the arliene. The arliene is coaxal. If the taber is basinal and the taber retrace the arliene then the taber sway the arliene. If something is basinal then it retrace the taber. If something sway the arliene then it sway the taber. If the taber is basinal then the taber retrace the arliene. If something is coaxal and salving then it sway the taber. If something retrace the arliene then it is basinal. If something sway the arliene then it is salving. If something sway the taber then the taber dovetail the arliene. The taber is not coaxal.", "logic": "\nRetrace(taber, arliene)\nCoaxal(arliene)\nBasinal(taber) and Retrace(taber, arliene) -> Sway(taber, arliene)\nforall x (Basinal(x) -> Retrace(x, taber))\nforall x (Sway(x, arliene) -> Sway(x, taber))\nBasinal(taber) -> Retrace(taber, arliene)\nforall x (Coaxal(x) and Salving(x) -> Sway(x, taber))\nforall x (Retrace(x, arliene) -> Basinal(x))\nforall x (Sway(x, arliene) -> Salving(x))\nforall x (Sway(x, taber) -> Dovetail(taber, arliene))\n\nnot Coaxal(taber)\n\nnot Coaxal(taber) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "The barby anneal the monte. The monte is decurved. If the barby is trimmed and the barby anneal the monte then the barby interject the monte. If something is trimmed then it anneal the barby. If something interject the monte then it interject the barby. If the barby is trimmed then the barby anneal the monte. If something is decurved and haematal then it interject the barby. If something anneal the monte then it is trimmed. If something interject the monte then it is haematal. If something interject the barby then the barby denature the monte. The monte is round.", "logic": "\nAnneal(barby, monte)\nDecurved(monte)\nTrimmed(barby) and Anneal(barby, monte) -> Interject(barby, monte)\nforall x (Trimmed(x) -> Anneal(x, barby))\nforall x (Interject(x, monte) -> Interject(x, barby))\nTrimmed(barby) -> Anneal(barby, monte)\nforall x (Decurved(x) and Haematal(x) -> Interject(x, barby))\nforall x (Anneal(x, monte) -> Trimmed(x))\nforall x (Interject(x, monte) -> Haematal(x))\nforall x (Interject(x, barby) -> Denature(barby, monte))\n\nRound(monte)\n\nRound(monte) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-310"} {"premises": "Josef is taxing. Josef is apogamous. Josef is eternal. Guenevere is axonal. Guenevere is jaundiced. Guenevere is taxing. Guenevere is eternal. If something is unwed then it is mishnaic. If something is unwed and taxing then it is eternal. Round things are jaundiced. If Josef is mishnaic and Josef is axonal then Josef is eternal. If something is apogamous then it is unwed. If Guenevere is mishnaic then Guenevere is jaundiced. Josef is eternal.", "logic": "\nTaxing(josef)\nApogamous(josef)\nEternal(josef)\nAxonal(guenevere)\nJaundiced(guenevere)\nTaxing(guenevere)\nEternal(guenevere)\nforall x (Unwed(x) -> Mishnaic(x))\nforall x (Unwed(x) and Taxing(x) -> Eternal(x))\nforall x (Mishnaic(x) -> Jaundiced(x))\nMishnaic(josef) and Axonal(josef) -> Eternal(josef)\nforall x (Apogamous(x) -> Unwed(x))\nMishnaic(guenevere) -> Jaundiced(guenevere)\n\nEternal(josef)\n\ntherefore Eternal(josef)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Robby is deft. Robby is former. Robby is fresh. Ainsley is spiderlike. Ainsley is dissilient. Ainsley is deft. Ainsley is fresh. If something is biserrate then it is marxist. If something is biserrate and deft then it is fresh. Round things are dissilient. If Robby is marxist and Robby is spiderlike then Robby is fresh. If something is former then it is biserrate. If Ainsley is marxist then Ainsley is dissilient. Ainsley is not fresh.", "logic": "\nDeft(robby)\nFormer(robby)\nFresh(robby)\nSpiderlike(ainsley)\nDissilient(ainsley)\nDeft(ainsley)\nFresh(ainsley)\nforall x (Biserrate(x) -> Marxist(x))\nforall x (Biserrate(x) and Deft(x) -> Fresh(x))\nforall x (Marxist(x) -> Dissilient(x))\nMarxist(robby) and Spiderlike(robby) -> Fresh(robby)\nforall x (Former(x) -> Biserrate(x))\nMarxist(ainsley) -> Dissilient(ainsley)\n\nnot Fresh(ainsley)\n\ntherefore Fresh(ainsley)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Dayna is airheaded. Dayna is comic. Dayna is ventricose. Aleks is cloven. Aleks is stellate. Aleks is airheaded. Aleks is ventricose. If something is castled then it is citified. If something is castled and airheaded then it is ventricose. Round things are stellate. If Dayna is citified and Dayna is cloven then Dayna is ventricose. If something is comic then it is castled. If Aleks is citified then Aleks is stellate. Dayna is castled.", "logic": "\nAirheaded(dayna)\nComic(dayna)\nVentricose(dayna)\nCloven(aleks)\nStellate(aleks)\nAirheaded(aleks)\nVentricose(aleks)\nforall x (Castled(x) -> Citified(x))\nforall x (Castled(x) and Airheaded(x) -> Ventricose(x))\nforall x (Citified(x) -> Stellate(x))\nCitified(dayna) and Cloven(dayna) -> Ventricose(dayna)\nforall x (Comic(x) -> Castled(x))\nCitified(aleks) -> Stellate(aleks)\n\nCastled(dayna)\n\nComic(dayna) and forall x (Comic(x) -> Castled(x)) -> therefore Castled(dayna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Violette is mannerly. Violette is anaglyptic. Violette is proximo. Ardith is purplish. Ardith is joined. Ardith is mannerly. Ardith is proximo. If something is received then it is timeless. If something is received and mannerly then it is proximo. Round things are joined. If Violette is timeless and Violette is purplish then Violette is proximo. If something is anaglyptic then it is received. If Ardith is timeless then Ardith is joined. Violette is not received.", "logic": "\nMannerly(violette)\nAnaglyptic(violette)\nProximo(violette)\nPurplish(ardith)\nJoined(ardith)\nMannerly(ardith)\nProximo(ardith)\nforall x (Received(x) -> Timeless(x))\nforall x (Received(x) and Mannerly(x) -> Proximo(x))\nforall x (Timeless(x) -> Joined(x))\nTimeless(violette) and Purplish(violette) -> Proximo(violette)\nforall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Received(x))\nTimeless(ardith) -> Joined(ardith)\n\nnot Received(violette)\n\nAnaglyptic(violette) and forall x (Anaglyptic(x) -> Received(x)) -> therefore Received(violette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Emmet is informed. Emmet is organismic. Emmet is underwater. Netty is fucking. Netty is algonquian. Netty is informed. Netty is underwater. If something is unstated then it is medicinal. If something is unstated and informed then it is underwater. Round things are algonquian. If Emmet is medicinal and Emmet is fucking then Emmet is underwater. If something is organismic then it is unstated. If Netty is medicinal then Netty is algonquian. Emmet is medicinal.", "logic": "\nInformed(emmet)\nOrganismic(emmet)\nUnderwater(emmet)\nFucking(netty)\nAlgonquian(netty)\nInformed(netty)\nUnderwater(netty)\nforall x (Unstated(x) -> Medicinal(x))\nforall x (Unstated(x) and Informed(x) -> Underwater(x))\nforall x (Medicinal(x) -> Algonquian(x))\nMedicinal(emmet) and Fucking(emmet) -> Underwater(emmet)\nforall x (Organismic(x) -> Unstated(x))\nMedicinal(netty) -> Algonquian(netty)\n\nMedicinal(emmet)\n\nOrganismic(emmet) and forall x (Organismic(x) -> Unstated(x)) -> therefore Unstated(emmet) Unstated(emmet) and forall x (Unstated(x) -> Medicinal(x)) -> therefore Medicinal(emmet)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Blisse is unifacial. Blisse is foliose. Blisse is levantine. Wyn is pressing. Wyn is extempore. Wyn is unifacial. Wyn is levantine. If something is aramaic then it is same. If something is aramaic and unifacial then it is levantine. Round things are extempore. If Blisse is same and Blisse is pressing then Blisse is levantine. If something is foliose then it is aramaic. If Wyn is same then Wyn is extempore. Blisse is not same.", "logic": "\nUnifacial(blisse)\nFoliose(blisse)\nLevantine(blisse)\nPressing(wyn)\nExtempore(wyn)\nUnifacial(wyn)\nLevantine(wyn)\nforall x (Aramaic(x) -> Same(x))\nforall x (Aramaic(x) and Unifacial(x) -> Levantine(x))\nforall x (Same(x) -> Extempore(x))\nSame(blisse) and Pressing(blisse) -> Levantine(blisse)\nforall x (Foliose(x) -> Aramaic(x))\nSame(wyn) -> Extempore(wyn)\n\nnot Same(blisse)\n\nFoliose(blisse) and forall x (Foliose(x) -> Aramaic(x)) -> therefore Aramaic(blisse) Aramaic(blisse) and forall x (Aramaic(x) -> Same(x)) -> therefore Same(blisse)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Gerold is innate. Gerold is centenary. Gerold is gaunt. Micah is ramose. Micah is peripheral. Micah is innate. Micah is gaunt. If something is okay then it is azygous. If something is okay and innate then it is gaunt. Round things are peripheral. If Gerold is azygous and Gerold is ramose then Gerold is gaunt. If something is centenary then it is okay. If Micah is azygous then Micah is peripheral. Gerold is peripheral.", "logic": "\nInnate(gerold)\nCentenary(gerold)\nGaunt(gerold)\nRamose(micah)\nPeripheral(micah)\nInnate(micah)\nGaunt(micah)\nforall x (Okay(x) -> Azygous(x))\nforall x (Okay(x) and Innate(x) -> Gaunt(x))\nforall x (Azygous(x) -> Peripheral(x))\nAzygous(gerold) and Ramose(gerold) -> Gaunt(gerold)\nforall x (Centenary(x) -> Okay(x))\nAzygous(micah) -> Peripheral(micah)\n\nPeripheral(gerold)\n\nCentenary(gerold) and forall x (Centenary(x) -> Okay(x)) -> therefore Okay(gerold) Okay(gerold) and forall x (Okay(x) -> Azygous(x)) -> therefore Azygous(gerold) Azygous(gerold) and forall x (Azygous(x) -> Peripheral(x)) -> therefore Peripheral(gerold)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "France is perplexing. France is unnotched. France is obstetric. Guthry is largo. Guthry is improbable. Guthry is perplexing. Guthry is obstetric. If something is cancroid then it is sharing. If something is cancroid and perplexing then it is obstetric. Round things are improbable. If France is sharing and France is largo then France is obstetric. If something is unnotched then it is cancroid. If Guthry is sharing then Guthry is improbable. France is not improbable.", "logic": "\nPerplexing(france)\nUnnotched(france)\nObstetric(france)\nLargo(guthry)\nImprobable(guthry)\nPerplexing(guthry)\nObstetric(guthry)\nforall x (Cancroid(x) -> Sharing(x))\nforall x (Cancroid(x) and Perplexing(x) -> Obstetric(x))\nforall x (Sharing(x) -> Improbable(x))\nSharing(france) and Largo(france) -> Obstetric(france)\nforall x (Unnotched(x) -> Cancroid(x))\nSharing(guthry) -> Improbable(guthry)\n\nnot Improbable(france)\n\nUnnotched(france) and forall x (Unnotched(x) -> Cancroid(x)) -> therefore Cancroid(france) Cancroid(france) and forall x (Cancroid(x) -> Sharing(x)) -> therefore Sharing(france) Sharing(france) and forall x (Sharing(x) -> Improbable(x)) -> therefore Improbable(france)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Saxe is ignorant. Saxe is seemly. Saxe is parlous. Lisha is magnetized. Lisha is silken. Lisha is ignorant. Lisha is parlous. If something is disabused then it is insanitary. If something is disabused and ignorant then it is parlous. Round things are silken. If Saxe is insanitary and Saxe is magnetized then Saxe is parlous. If something is seemly then it is disabused. If Lisha is insanitary then Lisha is silken. Lisha is not insanitary.", "logic": "\nIgnorant(saxe)\nSeemly(saxe)\nParlous(saxe)\nMagnetized(lisha)\nSilken(lisha)\nIgnorant(lisha)\nParlous(lisha)\nforall x (Disabused(x) -> Insanitary(x))\nforall x (Disabused(x) and Ignorant(x) -> Parlous(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) -> Silken(x))\nInsanitary(saxe) and Magnetized(saxe) -> Parlous(saxe)\nforall x (Seemly(x) -> Disabused(x))\nInsanitary(lisha) -> Silken(lisha)\n\nnot Insanitary(lisha)\n\nforall x (Disabused(x) -> Insanitary(x)) <- forall x (Seemly(x) -> Disabused(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Kamila is ungulate. Kamila is caecilian. Kamila is destined. Pennie is crazy. Pennie is grassy. Pennie is ungulate. Pennie is destined. If something is linnaean then it is vivid. If something is linnaean and ungulate then it is destined. Round things are grassy. If Kamila is vivid and Kamila is crazy then Kamila is destined. If something is caecilian then it is linnaean. If Pennie is vivid then Pennie is grassy. Pennie is linnaean.", "logic": "\nUngulate(kamila)\nCaecilian(kamila)\nDestined(kamila)\nCrazy(pennie)\nGrassy(pennie)\nUngulate(pennie)\nDestined(pennie)\nforall x (Linnaean(x) -> Vivid(x))\nforall x (Linnaean(x) and Ungulate(x) -> Destined(x))\nforall x (Vivid(x) -> Grassy(x))\nVivid(kamila) and Crazy(kamila) -> Destined(kamila)\nforall x (Caecilian(x) -> Linnaean(x))\nVivid(pennie) -> Grassy(pennie)\n\nLinnaean(pennie)\n\nforall x (Caecilian(x) -> Linnaean(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Adriane is hindustani. Adriane is frenetic. Adriane is frail. Taite is battered. Taite is roan. Taite is hindustani. Taite is frail. If something is cheerless then it is amused. If something is cheerless and hindustani then it is frail. Round things are roan. If Adriane is amused and Adriane is battered then Adriane is frail. If something is frenetic then it is cheerless. If Taite is amused then Taite is roan. Taite is not frenetic.", "logic": "\nHindustani(adriane)\nFrenetic(adriane)\nFrail(adriane)\nBattered(taite)\nRoan(taite)\nHindustani(taite)\nFrail(taite)\nforall x (Cheerless(x) -> Amused(x))\nforall x (Cheerless(x) and Hindustani(x) -> Frail(x))\nforall x (Amused(x) -> Roan(x))\nAmused(adriane) and Battered(adriane) -> Frail(adriane)\nforall x (Frenetic(x) -> Cheerless(x))\nAmused(taite) -> Roan(taite)\n\nnot Frenetic(taite)\n\nnot Frenetic(taite) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Cammi is valiant. Cammi is bloody. Cammi is exogenic. Dyson is immortal. Dyson is itchy. Dyson is valiant. Dyson is exogenic. If something is ethical then it is inexorable. If something is ethical and valiant then it is exogenic. Round things are itchy. If Cammi is inexorable and Cammi is immortal then Cammi is exogenic. If something is bloody then it is ethical. If Dyson is inexorable then Dyson is itchy. Cammi is immortal.", "logic": "\nValiant(cammi)\nBloody(cammi)\nExogenic(cammi)\nImmortal(dyson)\nItchy(dyson)\nValiant(dyson)\nExogenic(dyson)\nforall x (Ethical(x) -> Inexorable(x))\nforall x (Ethical(x) and Valiant(x) -> Exogenic(x))\nforall x (Inexorable(x) -> Itchy(x))\nInexorable(cammi) and Immortal(cammi) -> Exogenic(cammi)\nforall x (Bloody(x) -> Ethical(x))\nInexorable(dyson) -> Itchy(dyson)\n\nImmortal(cammi)\n\nImmortal(cammi) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1063"} {"premises": "Dyson is patented. Obie is not resolved. Waldon is decorated. Gladys is not umbellate. If Obie is unbaptized then Obie is decorated. Smart things are not unbaptized. Kind things are pyrrhic. All pyrrhic things are compulsory. All decorated things are resolved. If something is unbaptized and not decorated then it is resolved. Obie is not resolved.", "logic": "\nPatented(dyson)\nnot Resolved(obie)\nDecorated(waldon)\nnot Umbellate(gladys)\nUnbaptized(obie) -> Decorated(obie)\nforall x (Umbellate(x) -> not Unbaptized(x))\nforall x (Resolved(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) -> Compulsory(x))\nforall x (Decorated(x) -> Resolved(x))\nforall x (Unbaptized(x) and not Decorated(x) -> Resolved(x))\n\nnot Resolved(obie)\n\ntherefore not Resolved(obie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Daphna is cosmogonic. Joya is not ruminative. Yelena is chilean. Penny is not plummy. If Joya is wound then Joya is chilean. Smart things are not wound. Kind things are fancy. All fancy things are teensy. All chilean things are ruminative. If something is wound and not chilean then it is ruminative. Yelena is not chilean.", "logic": "\nCosmogonic(daphna)\nnot Ruminative(joya)\nChilean(yelena)\nnot Plummy(penny)\nWound(joya) -> Chilean(joya)\nforall x (Plummy(x) -> not Wound(x))\nforall x (Ruminative(x) -> Fancy(x))\nforall x (Fancy(x) -> Teensy(x))\nforall x (Chilean(x) -> Ruminative(x))\nforall x (Wound(x) and not Chilean(x) -> Ruminative(x))\n\nnot Chilean(yelena)\n\ntherefore Chilean(yelena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Esther is formless. Tracy is not astounded. Lorena is malicious. Rice is not chichi. If Tracy is funereal then Tracy is malicious. Smart things are not funereal. Kind things are incorrect. All incorrect things are hotheaded. All malicious things are astounded. If something is funereal and not malicious then it is astounded. Lorena is astounded.", "logic": "\nFormless(esther)\nnot Astounded(tracy)\nMalicious(lorena)\nnot Chichi(rice)\nFunereal(tracy) -> Malicious(tracy)\nforall x (Chichi(x) -> not Funereal(x))\nforall x (Astounded(x) -> Incorrect(x))\nforall x (Incorrect(x) -> Hotheaded(x))\nforall x (Malicious(x) -> Astounded(x))\nforall x (Funereal(x) and not Malicious(x) -> Astounded(x))\n\nAstounded(lorena)\n\nMalicious(lorena) and forall x (Malicious(x) -> Astounded(x)) -> therefore Astounded(lorena)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Skippie is shavian. Bernadine is not whiny. Gilberte is xxxiii. Orelle is not unapparent. If Bernadine is paraguayan then Bernadine is xxxiii. Smart things are not paraguayan. Kind things are nidifugous. All nidifugous things are peppery. All xxxiii things are whiny. If something is paraguayan and not xxxiii then it is whiny. Gilberte is not whiny.", "logic": "\nShavian(skippie)\nnot Whiny(bernadine)\nXxxiii(gilberte)\nnot Unapparent(orelle)\nParaguayan(bernadine) -> Xxxiii(bernadine)\nforall x (Unapparent(x) -> not Paraguayan(x))\nforall x (Whiny(x) -> Nidifugous(x))\nforall x (Nidifugous(x) -> Peppery(x))\nforall x (Xxxiii(x) -> Whiny(x))\nforall x (Paraguayan(x) and not Xxxiii(x) -> Whiny(x))\n\nnot Whiny(gilberte)\n\nXxxiii(gilberte) and forall x (Xxxiii(x) -> Whiny(x)) -> therefore Whiny(gilberte)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Stanislaw is sterile. Carlos is not undreamed. Wilmette is shrinkable. Patel is not subacid. If Carlos is imperative then Carlos is shrinkable. Smart things are not imperative. Kind things are ferocious. All ferocious things are dormie. All shrinkable things are undreamed. If something is imperative and not shrinkable then it is undreamed. Wilmette is ferocious.", "logic": "\nSterile(stanislaw)\nnot Undreamed(carlos)\nShrinkable(wilmette)\nnot Subacid(patel)\nImperative(carlos) -> Shrinkable(carlos)\nforall x (Subacid(x) -> not Imperative(x))\nforall x (Undreamed(x) -> Ferocious(x))\nforall x (Ferocious(x) -> Dormie(x))\nforall x (Shrinkable(x) -> Undreamed(x))\nforall x (Imperative(x) and not Shrinkable(x) -> Undreamed(x))\n\nFerocious(wilmette)\n\nShrinkable(wilmette) and forall x (Shrinkable(x) -> Undreamed(x)) -> therefore Undreamed(wilmette) Undreamed(wilmette) and forall x (Undreamed(x) -> Ferocious(x)) -> therefore Ferocious(wilmette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Teddi is caesarian. Merola is not driving. Edgar is warmed. Otes is not censurable. If Merola is epitheliod then Merola is warmed. Smart things are not epitheliod. Kind things are unequipped. All unequipped things are coastal. All warmed things are driving. If something is epitheliod and not warmed then it is driving. Edgar is not unequipped.", "logic": "\nCaesarian(teddi)\nnot Driving(merola)\nWarmed(edgar)\nnot Censurable(otes)\nEpitheliod(merola) -> Warmed(merola)\nforall x (Censurable(x) -> not Epitheliod(x))\nforall x (Driving(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Unequipped(x) -> Coastal(x))\nforall x (Warmed(x) -> Driving(x))\nforall x (Epitheliod(x) and not Warmed(x) -> Driving(x))\n\nnot Unequipped(edgar)\n\nWarmed(edgar) and forall x (Warmed(x) -> Driving(x)) -> therefore Driving(edgar) Driving(edgar) and forall x (Driving(x) -> Unequipped(x)) -> therefore Unequipped(edgar)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Reynard is partial. Dionysus is not legion. Hiro is offhanded. Hilarie is not gaping. If Dionysus is wormy then Dionysus is offhanded. Smart things are not wormy. Kind things are rotatable. All rotatable things are cambrian. All offhanded things are legion. If something is wormy and not offhanded then it is legion. Hiro is cambrian.", "logic": "\nPartial(reynard)\nnot Legion(dionysus)\nOffhanded(hiro)\nnot Gaping(hilarie)\nWormy(dionysus) -> Offhanded(dionysus)\nforall x (Gaping(x) -> not Wormy(x))\nforall x (Legion(x) -> Rotatable(x))\nforall x (Rotatable(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Offhanded(x) -> Legion(x))\nforall x (Wormy(x) and not Offhanded(x) -> Legion(x))\n\nCambrian(hiro)\n\nOffhanded(hiro) and forall x (Offhanded(x) -> Legion(x)) -> therefore Legion(hiro) Legion(hiro) and forall x (Legion(x) -> Rotatable(x)) -> therefore Rotatable(hiro) Rotatable(hiro) and forall x (Rotatable(x) -> Cambrian(x)) -> therefore Cambrian(hiro)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Torie is observant. Korrie is not slippery. Kerry is touristed. Fania is not periodic. If Korrie is accurate then Korrie is touristed. Smart things are not accurate. Kind things are arithmetic. All arithmetic things are unbraced. All touristed things are slippery. If something is accurate and not touristed then it is slippery. Kerry is not unbraced.", "logic": "\nObservant(torie)\nnot Slippery(korrie)\nTouristed(kerry)\nnot Periodic(fania)\nAccurate(korrie) -> Touristed(korrie)\nforall x (Periodic(x) -> not Accurate(x))\nforall x (Slippery(x) -> Arithmetic(x))\nforall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Unbraced(x))\nforall x (Touristed(x) -> Slippery(x))\nforall x (Accurate(x) and not Touristed(x) -> Slippery(x))\n\nnot Unbraced(kerry)\n\nTouristed(kerry) and forall x (Touristed(x) -> Slippery(x)) -> therefore Slippery(kerry) Slippery(kerry) and forall x (Slippery(x) -> Arithmetic(x)) -> therefore Arithmetic(kerry) Arithmetic(kerry) and forall x (Arithmetic(x) -> Unbraced(x)) -> therefore Unbraced(kerry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Carissa is tokenish. Harvie is not asymptotic. Marline is glossy. Clyde is not inferior. If Harvie is romansh then Harvie is glossy. Smart things are not romansh. Kind things are semihard. All semihard things are flagellate. All glossy things are asymptotic. If something is romansh and not glossy then it is asymptotic. Clyde is not semihard.", "logic": "\nTokenish(carissa)\nnot Asymptotic(harvie)\nGlossy(marline)\nnot Inferior(clyde)\nRomansh(harvie) -> Glossy(harvie)\nforall x (Inferior(x) -> not Romansh(x))\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) -> Semihard(x))\nforall x (Semihard(x) -> Flagellate(x))\nforall x (Glossy(x) -> Asymptotic(x))\nforall x (Romansh(x) and not Glossy(x) -> Asymptotic(x))\n\nnot Semihard(clyde)\n\nforall x (Asymptotic(x) -> Semihard(x)) <- forall x (Glossy(x) -> Asymptotic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Tamar is footsure. Brianna is not walleyed. Sumner is proximo. Daniele is not denuded. If Brianna is postpaid then Brianna is proximo. Smart things are not postpaid. Kind things are alated. All alated things are nosed. All proximo things are walleyed. If something is postpaid and not proximo then it is walleyed. Daniele is walleyed.", "logic": "\nFootsure(tamar)\nnot Walleyed(brianna)\nProximo(sumner)\nnot Denuded(daniele)\nPostpaid(brianna) -> Proximo(brianna)\nforall x (Denuded(x) -> not Postpaid(x))\nforall x (Walleyed(x) -> Alated(x))\nforall x (Alated(x) -> Nosed(x))\nforall x (Proximo(x) -> Walleyed(x))\nforall x (Postpaid(x) and not Proximo(x) -> Walleyed(x))\n\nWalleyed(daniele)\n\nforall x (Proximo(x) -> Walleyed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Venita is pressing. Rosetta is not favored. Gretal is whole. Lonnie is not mortgaged. If Rosetta is coquettish then Rosetta is whole. Smart things are not coquettish. Kind things are subtropic. All subtropic things are demoniacal. All whole things are favored. If something is coquettish and not whole then it is favored. Lonnie is not demoniacal.", "logic": "\nPressing(venita)\nnot Favored(rosetta)\nWhole(gretal)\nnot Mortgaged(lonnie)\nCoquettish(rosetta) -> Whole(rosetta)\nforall x (Mortgaged(x) -> not Coquettish(x))\nforall x (Favored(x) -> Subtropic(x))\nforall x (Subtropic(x) -> Demoniacal(x))\nforall x (Whole(x) -> Favored(x))\nforall x (Coquettish(x) and not Whole(x) -> Favored(x))\n\nnot Demoniacal(lonnie)\n\nforall x (Subtropic(x) -> Demoniacal(x)) <- forall x (Favored(x) -> Subtropic(x)) <- forall x (Whole(x) -> Favored(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Salmon is eery. Josy is not unartistic. Betta is hispanic. Maud is not isosceles. If Josy is bacchantic then Josy is hispanic. Smart things are not bacchantic. Kind things are postpartum. All postpartum things are passant. All hispanic things are unartistic. If something is bacchantic and not hispanic then it is unartistic. Josy is passant.", "logic": "\nEery(salmon)\nnot Unartistic(josy)\nHispanic(betta)\nnot Isosceles(maud)\nBacchantic(josy) -> Hispanic(josy)\nforall x (Isosceles(x) -> not Bacchantic(x))\nforall x (Unartistic(x) -> Postpartum(x))\nforall x (Postpartum(x) -> Passant(x))\nforall x (Hispanic(x) -> Unartistic(x))\nforall x (Bacchantic(x) and not Hispanic(x) -> Unartistic(x))\n\nPassant(josy)\n\nforall x (Postpartum(x) -> Passant(x)) <- forall x (Unartistic(x) -> Postpartum(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Mallissa is unvalued. Rosmunda is not riblike. Risa is greek. Bridgett is not mellowed. If Rosmunda is monotonic then Rosmunda is greek. Smart things are not monotonic. Kind things are robust. All robust things are sure. All greek things are riblike. If something is monotonic and not greek then it is riblike. Mallissa is not monotonic.", "logic": "\nUnvalued(mallissa)\nnot Riblike(rosmunda)\nGreek(risa)\nnot Mellowed(bridgett)\nMonotonic(rosmunda) -> Greek(rosmunda)\nforall x (Mellowed(x) -> not Monotonic(x))\nforall x (Riblike(x) -> Robust(x))\nforall x (Robust(x) -> Sure(x))\nforall x (Greek(x) -> Riblike(x))\nforall x (Monotonic(x) and not Greek(x) -> Riblike(x))\n\nnot Monotonic(mallissa)\n\nnot Monotonic(mallissa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Glen is sulcate. Camella is not hyperbolic. Carli is uncoiled. Asia is not trigonal. If Camella is grateful then Camella is uncoiled. Smart things are not grateful. Kind things are seeing. All seeing things are erotic. All uncoiled things are hyperbolic. If something is grateful and not uncoiled then it is hyperbolic. Camella is sulcate.", "logic": "\nSulcate(glen)\nnot Hyperbolic(camella)\nUncoiled(carli)\nnot Trigonal(asia)\nGrateful(camella) -> Uncoiled(camella)\nforall x (Trigonal(x) -> not Grateful(x))\nforall x (Hyperbolic(x) -> Seeing(x))\nforall x (Seeing(x) -> Erotic(x))\nforall x (Uncoiled(x) -> Hyperbolic(x))\nforall x (Grateful(x) and not Uncoiled(x) -> Hyperbolic(x))\n\nSulcate(camella)\n\nSulcate(camella) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Trude is crenulated. Tamarah is not astonished. Maiga is thorough. Stirling is not imitation. If Tamarah is implicated then Tamarah is thorough. Smart things are not implicated. Kind things are expandible. All expandible things are unspoilt. All thorough things are astonished. If something is implicated and not thorough then it is astonished. Tamarah is not implicated.", "logic": "\nCrenulated(trude)\nnot Astonished(tamarah)\nThorough(maiga)\nnot Imitation(stirling)\nImplicated(tamarah) -> Thorough(tamarah)\nforall x (Imitation(x) -> not Implicated(x))\nforall x (Astonished(x) -> Expandible(x))\nforall x (Expandible(x) -> Unspoilt(x))\nforall x (Thorough(x) -> Astonished(x))\nforall x (Implicated(x) and not Thorough(x) -> Astonished(x))\n\nnot Implicated(tamarah)\n\nnot Implicated(tamarah) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Chloe is classic. Fortune is not ecologic. Jenny is dejected. Sallee is not unbarreled. If Fortune is splanchnic then Fortune is dejected. Smart things are not splanchnic. Kind things are rearing. All rearing things are owned. All dejected things are ecologic. If something is splanchnic and not dejected then it is ecologic. Jenny is splanchnic.", "logic": "\nClassic(chloe)\nnot Ecologic(fortune)\nDejected(jenny)\nnot Unbarreled(sallee)\nSplanchnic(fortune) -> Dejected(fortune)\nforall x (Unbarreled(x) -> not Splanchnic(x))\nforall x (Ecologic(x) -> Rearing(x))\nforall x (Rearing(x) -> Owned(x))\nforall x (Dejected(x) -> Ecologic(x))\nforall x (Splanchnic(x) and not Dejected(x) -> Ecologic(x))\n\nSplanchnic(jenny)\n\nSplanchnic(jenny) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-98"} {"premises": "Grove is receding. Grove is bustling. Grove is spinal. Anatollo is bustling. Anatollo is employed. Illa is receding. Illa is bustling. Illa is employed. Illa is personal. Illa is spinal. Illa is pertinent. Illa is untilled. All pertinent, personal people are spinal. Kind people are employed. All spinal, untilled people are pertinent. Grove is spinal.", "logic": "\nReceding(grove)\nBustling(grove)\nSpinal(grove)\nBustling(anatollo)\nEmployed(anatollo)\nReceding(illa)\nBustling(illa)\nEmployed(illa)\nPersonal(illa)\nSpinal(illa)\nPertinent(illa)\nUntilled(illa)\nforall x (Pertinent(x) and Personal(x) -> Spinal(x))\nforall x (Spinal(x) -> Employed(x))\nforall x (Spinal(x) and Untilled(x) -> Pertinent(x))\n\nSpinal(grove)\n\ntherefore Spinal(grove)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "Byron is aglitter. Byron is incipient. Byron is devalued. Barclay is incipient. Barclay is broadleaf. Jill is aglitter. Jill is incipient. Jill is broadleaf. Jill is imperial. Jill is devalued. Jill is unnoticed. Jill is ambrosian. All unnoticed, imperial people are devalued. Kind people are broadleaf. All devalued, ambrosian people are unnoticed. Jill is not unnoticed.", "logic": "\nAglitter(byron)\nIncipient(byron)\nDevalued(byron)\nIncipient(barclay)\nBroadleaf(barclay)\nAglitter(jill)\nIncipient(jill)\nBroadleaf(jill)\nImperial(jill)\nDevalued(jill)\nUnnoticed(jill)\nAmbrosian(jill)\nforall x (Unnoticed(x) and Imperial(x) -> Devalued(x))\nforall x (Devalued(x) -> Broadleaf(x))\nforall x (Devalued(x) and Ambrosian(x) -> Unnoticed(x))\n\nnot Unnoticed(jill)\n\ntherefore Unnoticed(jill)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "Benni is nocturnal. Benni is storeyed. Benni is crowning. Gates is storeyed. Gates is faceless. Wright is nocturnal. Wright is storeyed. Wright is faceless. Wright is chinchy. Wright is crowning. Wright is collarless. Wright is lymphatic. All collarless, chinchy people are crowning. Kind people are faceless. All crowning, lymphatic people are collarless. Benni is faceless.", "logic": "\nNocturnal(benni)\nStoreyed(benni)\nCrowning(benni)\nStoreyed(gates)\nFaceless(gates)\nNocturnal(wright)\nStoreyed(wright)\nFaceless(wright)\nChinchy(wright)\nCrowning(wright)\nCollarless(wright)\nLymphatic(wright)\nforall x (Collarless(x) and Chinchy(x) -> Crowning(x))\nforall x (Crowning(x) -> Faceless(x))\nforall x (Crowning(x) and Lymphatic(x) -> Collarless(x))\n\nFaceless(benni)\n\nCrowning(benni) and forall x (Crowning(x) -> Faceless(x)) -> therefore Faceless(benni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "Demetra is preanal. Demetra is diacritic. Demetra is fortemente. Viola is diacritic. Viola is fiendish. Marielle is preanal. Marielle is diacritic. Marielle is fiendish. Marielle is brazen. Marielle is fortemente. Marielle is expiative. Marielle is anaclitic. All expiative, brazen people are fortemente. Kind people are fiendish. All fortemente, anaclitic people are expiative. Demetra is not fiendish.", "logic": "\nPreanal(demetra)\nDiacritic(demetra)\nFortemente(demetra)\nDiacritic(viola)\nFiendish(viola)\nPreanal(marielle)\nDiacritic(marielle)\nFiendish(marielle)\nBrazen(marielle)\nFortemente(marielle)\nExpiative(marielle)\nAnaclitic(marielle)\nforall x (Expiative(x) and Brazen(x) -> Fortemente(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) -> Fiendish(x))\nforall x (Fortemente(x) and Anaclitic(x) -> Expiative(x))\n\nnot Fiendish(demetra)\n\nFortemente(demetra) and forall x (Fortemente(x) -> Fiendish(x)) -> therefore Fiendish(demetra)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "Dolorita is choleraic. Dolorita is libyan. Dolorita is strident. Laura is libyan. Laura is absurd. Rosalind is choleraic. Rosalind is libyan. Rosalind is absurd. Rosalind is bawdy. Rosalind is strident. Rosalind is agonized. Rosalind is sniffly. All agonized, bawdy people are strident. Kind people are absurd. All strident, sniffly people are agonized. Laura is not agonized.", "logic": "\nCholeraic(dolorita)\nLibyan(dolorita)\nStrident(dolorita)\nLibyan(laura)\nAbsurd(laura)\nCholeraic(rosalind)\nLibyan(rosalind)\nAbsurd(rosalind)\nBawdy(rosalind)\nStrident(rosalind)\nAgonized(rosalind)\nSniffly(rosalind)\nforall x (Agonized(x) and Bawdy(x) -> Strident(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) -> Absurd(x))\nforall x (Strident(x) and Sniffly(x) -> Agonized(x))\n\nnot Agonized(laura)\n\nforall x (Strident(x) and Sniffly(x) -> Agonized(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "Lorianne is aggregated. Lorianne is balking. Lorianne is erect. Tabor is balking. Tabor is ascending. Chev is aggregated. Chev is balking. Chev is ascending. Chev is consoling. Chev is erect. Chev is spouting. Chev is feeble. All spouting, consoling people are erect. Kind people are ascending. All erect, feeble people are spouting. Lorianne is spouting.", "logic": "\nAggregated(lorianne)\nBalking(lorianne)\nErect(lorianne)\nBalking(tabor)\nAscending(tabor)\nAggregated(chev)\nBalking(chev)\nAscending(chev)\nConsoling(chev)\nErect(chev)\nSpouting(chev)\nFeeble(chev)\nforall x (Spouting(x) and Consoling(x) -> Erect(x))\nforall x (Erect(x) -> Ascending(x))\nforall x (Erect(x) and Feeble(x) -> Spouting(x))\n\nSpouting(lorianne)\n\nforall x (Erect(x) and Feeble(x) -> Spouting(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "Belita is healthier. Belita is crushing. Belita is tacky. Guinevere is crushing. Guinevere is voluminous. Joly is healthier. Joly is crushing. Joly is voluminous. Joly is fogbound. Joly is tacky. Joly is emeritus. Joly is blown. All emeritus, fogbound people are tacky. Kind people are voluminous. All tacky, blown people are emeritus. Guinevere is not fogbound.", "logic": "\nHealthier(belita)\nCrushing(belita)\nTacky(belita)\nCrushing(guinevere)\nVoluminous(guinevere)\nHealthier(joly)\nCrushing(joly)\nVoluminous(joly)\nFogbound(joly)\nTacky(joly)\nEmeritus(joly)\nBlown(joly)\nforall x (Emeritus(x) and Fogbound(x) -> Tacky(x))\nforall x (Tacky(x) -> Voluminous(x))\nforall x (Tacky(x) and Blown(x) -> Emeritus(x))\n\nnot Fogbound(guinevere)\n\nnot Fogbound(guinevere) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "Veradis is crabbed. Veradis is unsalted. Veradis is suited. Alic is unsalted. Alic is northwest. Arlinda is crabbed. Arlinda is unsalted. Arlinda is northwest. Arlinda is unblinking. Arlinda is suited. Arlinda is unwaxed. Arlinda is cutaneal. All unwaxed, unblinking people are suited. Kind people are northwest. All suited, cutaneal people are unwaxed. Veradis is cutaneal.", "logic": "\nCrabbed(veradis)\nUnsalted(veradis)\nSuited(veradis)\nUnsalted(alic)\nNorthwest(alic)\nCrabbed(arlinda)\nUnsalted(arlinda)\nNorthwest(arlinda)\nUnblinking(arlinda)\nSuited(arlinda)\nUnwaxed(arlinda)\nCutaneal(arlinda)\nforall x (Unwaxed(x) and Unblinking(x) -> Suited(x))\nforall x (Suited(x) -> Northwest(x))\nforall x (Suited(x) and Cutaneal(x) -> Unwaxed(x))\n\nCutaneal(veradis)\n\nCutaneal(veradis) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-1118"} {"premises": "The marjory is fernlike. All moderato, fernlike people are ribald. If someone is ectozoan then they are ribald. The marjory is fernlike.", "logic": "\nFernlike(marjory)\nforall x (Moderato(x) and Fernlike(x) -> Ribald(x))\nforall x (Ectozoan(x) -> Ribald(x))\n\nFernlike(marjory)\n\ntherefore Fernlike(marjory)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5098"} {"premises": "The neel is cultivated. All micropylar, cultivated people are nonimmune. If someone is diabetic then they are nonimmune. The neel is not cultivated.", "logic": "\nCultivated(neel)\nforall x (Micropylar(x) and Cultivated(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\nforall x (Diabetic(x) -> Nonimmune(x))\n\nnot Cultivated(neel)\n\ntherefore Cultivated(neel)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5098"} {"premises": "The maegan is untasted. All thoughtful, untasted people are ordinal. If someone is britannic then they are ordinal. The maegan is not ordinal.", "logic": "\nUntasted(maegan)\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) and Untasted(x) -> Ordinal(x))\nforall x (Britannic(x) -> Ordinal(x))\n\nnot Ordinal(maegan)\n\nforall x (Thoughtful(x) and Untasted(x) -> Ordinal(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5098"} {"premises": "The eleonore is nonhuman. All firstborn, nonhuman people are telephonic. If someone is vocative then they are telephonic. The eleonore sees the eleonore.", "logic": "\nNonhuman(eleonore)\nforall x (Firstborn(x) and Nonhuman(x) -> Telephonic(x))\nforall x (Vocative(x) -> Telephonic(x))\n\nSees(eleonore, eleonore)\n\nSees(eleonore, eleonore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5098"} {"premises": "Fred is ungallant. Fred is alkahestic. Fred is interred. Fred is idiopathic. Fred is suppressed. Fred is surplus. Fred is dormy. Raven is alkahestic. Raven is suppressed. Raven is dormy. Jorie is ungallant. Jorie is interred. Jorie is idiopathic. Jorie is surplus. Jorie is dormy. Quiet things are ungallant. If Raven is alkahestic then Raven is idiopathic. Fred is suppressed.", "logic": "\nUngallant(fred)\nAlkahestic(fred)\nInterred(fred)\nIdiopathic(fred)\nSuppressed(fred)\nSurplus(fred)\nDormy(fred)\nAlkahestic(raven)\nSuppressed(raven)\nDormy(raven)\nUngallant(jorie)\nInterred(jorie)\nIdiopathic(jorie)\nSurplus(jorie)\nDormy(jorie)\nforall x (Idiopathic(x) -> Ungallant(x))\nAlkahestic(raven) -> Idiopathic(raven)\n\nSuppressed(fred)\n\ntherefore Suppressed(fred)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Mechelle is opaline. Mechelle is pejorative. Mechelle is healing. Mechelle is typic. Mechelle is attentive. Mechelle is goodish. Mechelle is staccato. Giffie is pejorative. Giffie is attentive. Giffie is staccato. Shirlee is opaline. Shirlee is healing. Shirlee is typic. Shirlee is goodish. Shirlee is staccato. Quiet things are opaline. If Giffie is pejorative then Giffie is typic. Mechelle is not pejorative.", "logic": "\nOpaline(mechelle)\nPejorative(mechelle)\nHealing(mechelle)\nTypic(mechelle)\nAttentive(mechelle)\nGoodish(mechelle)\nStaccato(mechelle)\nPejorative(giffie)\nAttentive(giffie)\nStaccato(giffie)\nOpaline(shirlee)\nHealing(shirlee)\nTypic(shirlee)\nGoodish(shirlee)\nStaccato(shirlee)\nforall x (Typic(x) -> Opaline(x))\nPejorative(giffie) -> Typic(giffie)\n\nnot Pejorative(mechelle)\n\ntherefore Pejorative(mechelle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Melanie is colloidal. Melanie is rarefied. Melanie is signed. Melanie is regulation. Melanie is tusked. Melanie is horny. Melanie is coroneted. Farica is rarefied. Farica is tusked. Farica is coroneted. Berni is colloidal. Berni is signed. Berni is regulation. Berni is horny. Berni is coroneted. Quiet things are colloidal. If Farica is rarefied then Farica is regulation. Farica is regulation.", "logic": "\nColloidal(melanie)\nRarefied(melanie)\nSigned(melanie)\nRegulation(melanie)\nTusked(melanie)\nHorny(melanie)\nCoroneted(melanie)\nRarefied(farica)\nTusked(farica)\nCoroneted(farica)\nColloidal(berni)\nSigned(berni)\nRegulation(berni)\nHorny(berni)\nCoroneted(berni)\nforall x (Regulation(x) -> Colloidal(x))\nRarefied(farica) -> Regulation(farica)\n\nRegulation(farica)\n\nRarefied(farica) and Rarefied(farica) -> Regulation(farica) -> therefore Regulation(farica)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Caroljean is snuff. Caroljean is huge. Caroljean is cogitative. Caroljean is sprawly. Caroljean is functional. Caroljean is frothing. Caroljean is ignitable. Micheline is huge. Micheline is functional. Micheline is ignitable. Junie is snuff. Junie is cogitative. Junie is sprawly. Junie is frothing. Junie is ignitable. Quiet things are snuff. If Micheline is huge then Micheline is sprawly. Micheline is not sprawly.", "logic": "\nSnuff(caroljean)\nHuge(caroljean)\nCogitative(caroljean)\nSprawly(caroljean)\nFunctional(caroljean)\nFrothing(caroljean)\nIgnitable(caroljean)\nHuge(micheline)\nFunctional(micheline)\nIgnitable(micheline)\nSnuff(junie)\nCogitative(junie)\nSprawly(junie)\nFrothing(junie)\nIgnitable(junie)\nforall x (Sprawly(x) -> Snuff(x))\nHuge(micheline) -> Sprawly(micheline)\n\nnot Sprawly(micheline)\n\nHuge(micheline) and Huge(micheline) -> Sprawly(micheline) -> therefore Sprawly(micheline)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Garnette is slushy. Garnette is unmindful. Garnette is identical. Garnette is segmental. Garnette is disposed. Garnette is uneven. Garnette is menopausal. Annadiane is unmindful. Annadiane is disposed. Annadiane is menopausal. Corena is slushy. Corena is identical. Corena is segmental. Corena is uneven. Corena is menopausal. Quiet things are slushy. If Annadiane is unmindful then Annadiane is segmental. Annadiane is slushy.", "logic": "\nSlushy(garnette)\nUnmindful(garnette)\nIdentical(garnette)\nSegmental(garnette)\nDisposed(garnette)\nUneven(garnette)\nMenopausal(garnette)\nUnmindful(annadiane)\nDisposed(annadiane)\nMenopausal(annadiane)\nSlushy(corena)\nIdentical(corena)\nSegmental(corena)\nUneven(corena)\nMenopausal(corena)\nforall x (Segmental(x) -> Slushy(x))\nUnmindful(annadiane) -> Segmental(annadiane)\n\nSlushy(annadiane)\n\nUnmindful(annadiane) and Unmindful(annadiane) -> Segmental(annadiane) -> therefore Segmental(annadiane) Segmental(annadiane) and forall x (Segmental(x) -> Slushy(x)) -> therefore Slushy(annadiane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Katharine is ischaemic. Katharine is twisty. Katharine is sapiens. Katharine is acidic. Katharine is rentable. Katharine is epigastric. Katharine is vulturous. Donica is twisty. Donica is rentable. Donica is vulturous. Chalmers is ischaemic. Chalmers is sapiens. Chalmers is acidic. Chalmers is epigastric. Chalmers is vulturous. Quiet things are ischaemic. If Donica is twisty then Donica is acidic. Donica is not ischaemic.", "logic": "\nIschaemic(katharine)\nTwisty(katharine)\nSapiens(katharine)\nAcidic(katharine)\nRentable(katharine)\nEpigastric(katharine)\nVulturous(katharine)\nTwisty(donica)\nRentable(donica)\nVulturous(donica)\nIschaemic(chalmers)\nSapiens(chalmers)\nAcidic(chalmers)\nEpigastric(chalmers)\nVulturous(chalmers)\nforall x (Acidic(x) -> Ischaemic(x))\nTwisty(donica) -> Acidic(donica)\n\nnot Ischaemic(donica)\n\nTwisty(donica) and Twisty(donica) -> Acidic(donica) -> therefore Acidic(donica) Acidic(donica) and forall x (Acidic(x) -> Ischaemic(x)) -> therefore Ischaemic(donica)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Lefty is assuming. Lefty is appellant. Lefty is alpine. Lefty is autotelic. Lefty is palmy. Lefty is inerrable. Lefty is capsular. Nanine is appellant. Nanine is palmy. Nanine is capsular. Bailie is assuming. Bailie is alpine. Bailie is autotelic. Bailie is inerrable. Bailie is capsular. Quiet things are assuming. If Nanine is appellant then Nanine is autotelic. Bailie is not palmy.", "logic": "\nAssuming(lefty)\nAppellant(lefty)\nAlpine(lefty)\nAutotelic(lefty)\nPalmy(lefty)\nInerrable(lefty)\nCapsular(lefty)\nAppellant(nanine)\nPalmy(nanine)\nCapsular(nanine)\nAssuming(bailie)\nAlpine(bailie)\nAutotelic(bailie)\nInerrable(bailie)\nCapsular(bailie)\nforall x (Autotelic(x) -> Assuming(x))\nAppellant(nanine) -> Autotelic(nanine)\n\nnot Palmy(bailie)\n\nnot Palmy(bailie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Libbi is inclined. Libbi is deadpan. Libbi is arctic. Libbi is unabashed. Libbi is dystopian. Libbi is aspheric. Libbi is garlicky. Torrence is deadpan. Torrence is dystopian. Torrence is garlicky. Bennett is inclined. Bennett is arctic. Bennett is unabashed. Bennett is aspheric. Bennett is garlicky. Quiet things are inclined. If Torrence is deadpan then Torrence is unabashed. Torrence is aspheric.", "logic": "\nInclined(libbi)\nDeadpan(libbi)\nArctic(libbi)\nUnabashed(libbi)\nDystopian(libbi)\nAspheric(libbi)\nGarlicky(libbi)\nDeadpan(torrence)\nDystopian(torrence)\nGarlicky(torrence)\nInclined(bennett)\nArctic(bennett)\nUnabashed(bennett)\nAspheric(bennett)\nGarlicky(bennett)\nforall x (Unabashed(x) -> Inclined(x))\nDeadpan(torrence) -> Unabashed(torrence)\n\nAspheric(torrence)\n\nAspheric(torrence) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Jesse is meddlesome. Jesse is sapid. Jesse is tenderized. Jesse is galled. Jesse is aeronautic. Jesse is faveolate. Jesse is atonal. Julius is sapid. Julius is aeronautic. Julius is atonal. Johann is meddlesome. Johann is tenderized. Johann is galled. Johann is faveolate. Johann is atonal. Quiet things are meddlesome. If Julius is sapid then Julius is galled. Julius is not tenderized.", "logic": "\nMeddlesome(jesse)\nSapid(jesse)\nTenderized(jesse)\nGalled(jesse)\nAeronautic(jesse)\nFaveolate(jesse)\nAtonal(jesse)\nSapid(julius)\nAeronautic(julius)\nAtonal(julius)\nMeddlesome(johann)\nTenderized(johann)\nGalled(johann)\nFaveolate(johann)\nAtonal(johann)\nforall x (Galled(x) -> Meddlesome(x))\nSapid(julius) -> Galled(julius)\n\nnot Tenderized(julius)\n\nnot Tenderized(julius) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "Wandie is polyphonic. Wandie is meagerly. Wandie is vatic. Wandie is stirred. Wandie is unexpired. Wandie is epithelial. Wandie is tiring. Shela is meagerly. Shela is unexpired. Shela is tiring. Elmer is polyphonic. Elmer is vatic. Elmer is stirred. Elmer is epithelial. Elmer is tiring. Quiet things are polyphonic. If Shela is meagerly then Shela is stirred. Elmer is meagerly.", "logic": "\nPolyphonic(wandie)\nMeagerly(wandie)\nVatic(wandie)\nStirred(wandie)\nUnexpired(wandie)\nEpithelial(wandie)\nTiring(wandie)\nMeagerly(shela)\nUnexpired(shela)\nTiring(shela)\nPolyphonic(elmer)\nVatic(elmer)\nStirred(elmer)\nEpithelial(elmer)\nTiring(elmer)\nforall x (Stirred(x) -> Polyphonic(x))\nMeagerly(shela) -> Stirred(shela)\n\nMeagerly(elmer)\n\nMeagerly(elmer) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D2-1559"} {"premises": "The marley is loathsome. The marley is haired. The marley is cutaneal. The marley is unembodied. The marley is mismatched. If the marley is haired and the marley is loathsome then the marley is unembodied. All cutaneal people are loathsome. The marley is unembodied.", "logic": "\nLoathsome(marley)\nHaired(marley)\nCutaneal(marley)\nUnembodied(marley)\nMismatched(marley)\nHaired(marley) and Loathsome(marley) -> Unembodied(marley)\nforall x (Cutaneal(x) -> Loathsome(x))\n\nUnembodied(marley)\n\ntherefore Unembodied(marley)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5120"} {"premises": "The janene is repeated. The janene is ototoxic. The janene is sketchy. The janene is greedy. The janene is jutting. If the janene is ototoxic and the janene is repeated then the janene is greedy. All sketchy people are repeated. The janene is not jutting.", "logic": "\nRepeated(janene)\nOtotoxic(janene)\nSketchy(janene)\nGreedy(janene)\nJutting(janene)\nOtotoxic(janene) and Repeated(janene) -> Greedy(janene)\nforall x (Sketchy(x) -> Repeated(x))\n\nnot Jutting(janene)\n\ntherefore Jutting(janene)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5120"} {"premises": "The annalisa is chiasmal. The annalisa is lengthways. The annalisa is limbless. The annalisa is exploited. The annalisa is phonetic. If the annalisa is lengthways and the annalisa is chiasmal then the annalisa is exploited. All limbless people are chiasmal. The annalisa does not chase the annalisa.", "logic": "\nChiasmal(annalisa)\nLengthways(annalisa)\nLimbless(annalisa)\nExploited(annalisa)\nPhonetic(annalisa)\nLengthways(annalisa) and Chiasmal(annalisa) -> Exploited(annalisa)\nforall x (Limbless(x) -> Chiasmal(x))\n\nnot Chases(annalisa, annalisa)\n\nnot Chases(annalisa, annalisa) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5120"} {"premises": "The mercedes is kitschy. The mercedes is lame. The mercedes is bookable. The mercedes is mistaken. The mercedes is valent. If the mercedes is lame and the mercedes is kitschy then the mercedes is mistaken. All bookable people are kitschy. The mercedes likes the mercedes.", "logic": "\nKitschy(mercedes)\nLame(mercedes)\nBookable(mercedes)\nMistaken(mercedes)\nValent(mercedes)\nLame(mercedes) and Kitschy(mercedes) -> Mistaken(mercedes)\nforall x (Bookable(x) -> Kitschy(x))\n\nLikes(mercedes, mercedes)\n\nLikes(mercedes, mercedes) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-5120"} {"premises": "Farrand is said. Farrand is divine. Farrand is bedaubed. Lusa is said. Lusa is divine. Lusa is serologic. Lusa is thrifty. Delilah is said. Delilah is organismal. Delilah is grapelike. Delilah is thrifty. Astra is bedaubed. If something is bedaubed then it is organismal. If something is thrifty then it is divine. All thrifty things are said. If something is organismal and said then it is bedaubed. If Lusa is organismal and Lusa is said then Lusa is bedaubed. Kind things are bedaubed. Lusa is serologic.", "logic": "\nSaid(farrand)\nDivine(farrand)\nBedaubed(farrand)\nSaid(lusa)\nDivine(lusa)\nSerologic(lusa)\nThrifty(lusa)\nSaid(delilah)\nOrganismal(delilah)\nGrapelike(delilah)\nThrifty(delilah)\nBedaubed(astra)\nforall x (Bedaubed(x) -> Organismal(x))\nforall x (Thrifty(x) -> Divine(x))\nforall x (Thrifty(x) -> Said(x))\nforall x (Organismal(x) and Said(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\nOrganismal(lusa) and Said(lusa) -> Bedaubed(lusa)\nforall x (Organismal(x) -> Bedaubed(x))\n\nSerologic(lusa)\n\ntherefore Serologic(lusa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "Stephana is dormant. Stephana is braided. Stephana is soprano. Riannon is dormant. Riannon is braided. Riannon is surmisable. Riannon is shingly. Danny is dormant. Danny is confusable. Danny is potholed. Danny is shingly. Randene is soprano. If something is soprano then it is confusable. If something is shingly then it is braided. All shingly things are dormant. If something is confusable and dormant then it is soprano. If Riannon is confusable and Riannon is dormant then Riannon is soprano. Kind things are soprano. Stephana is not dormant.", "logic": "\nDormant(stephana)\nBraided(stephana)\nSoprano(stephana)\nDormant(riannon)\nBraided(riannon)\nSurmisable(riannon)\nShingly(riannon)\nDormant(danny)\nConfusable(danny)\nPotholed(danny)\nShingly(danny)\nSoprano(randene)\nforall x (Soprano(x) -> Confusable(x))\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Braided(x))\nforall x (Shingly(x) -> Dormant(x))\nforall x (Confusable(x) and Dormant(x) -> Soprano(x))\nConfusable(riannon) and Dormant(riannon) -> Soprano(riannon)\nforall x (Confusable(x) -> Soprano(x))\n\nnot Dormant(stephana)\n\ntherefore Dormant(stephana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "Catlee is czaristic. Catlee is finished. Catlee is pleonastic. Tallia is czaristic. Tallia is finished. Tallia is frigid. Tallia is sentient. Cosetta is czaristic. Cosetta is palatal. Cosetta is bonny. Cosetta is sentient. Maryl is pleonastic. If something is pleonastic then it is palatal. If something is sentient then it is finished. All sentient things are czaristic. If something is palatal and czaristic then it is pleonastic. If Tallia is palatal and Tallia is czaristic then Tallia is pleonastic. Kind things are pleonastic. Maryl is palatal.", "logic": "\nCzaristic(catlee)\nFinished(catlee)\nPleonastic(catlee)\nCzaristic(tallia)\nFinished(tallia)\nFrigid(tallia)\nSentient(tallia)\nCzaristic(cosetta)\nPalatal(cosetta)\nBonny(cosetta)\nSentient(cosetta)\nPleonastic(maryl)\nforall x (Pleonastic(x) -> Palatal(x))\nforall x (Sentient(x) -> Finished(x))\nforall x (Sentient(x) -> Czaristic(x))\nforall x (Palatal(x) and Czaristic(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\nPalatal(tallia) and Czaristic(tallia) -> Pleonastic(tallia)\nforall x (Palatal(x) -> Pleonastic(x))\n\nPalatal(maryl)\n\nPleonastic(maryl) and forall x (Pleonastic(x) -> Palatal(x)) -> therefore Palatal(maryl)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "Urban is able. Urban is inculpable. Urban is pocketable. Isador is able. Isador is inculpable. Isador is untagged. Isador is scientific. Parker is able. Parker is eighth. Parker is xciii. Parker is scientific. Slade is pocketable. If something is pocketable then it is eighth. If something is scientific then it is inculpable. All scientific things are able. If something is eighth and able then it is pocketable. If Isador is eighth and Isador is able then Isador is pocketable. Kind things are pocketable. Parker is not pocketable.", "logic": "\nAble(urban)\nInculpable(urban)\nPocketable(urban)\nAble(isador)\nInculpable(isador)\nUntagged(isador)\nScientific(isador)\nAble(parker)\nEighth(parker)\nXciii(parker)\nScientific(parker)\nPocketable(slade)\nforall x (Pocketable(x) -> Eighth(x))\nforall x (Scientific(x) -> Inculpable(x))\nforall x (Scientific(x) -> Able(x))\nforall x (Eighth(x) and Able(x) -> Pocketable(x))\nEighth(isador) and Able(isador) -> Pocketable(isador)\nforall x (Eighth(x) -> Pocketable(x))\n\nnot Pocketable(parker)\n\nEighth(parker) and forall x (Eighth(x) -> Pocketable(x)) -> therefore Pocketable(parker)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "Alysia is wartlike. Alysia is drizzly. Alysia is illusive. Meaghan is wartlike. Meaghan is drizzly. Meaghan is given. Meaghan is general. Farand is wartlike. Farand is unloved. Farand is releasing. Farand is general. Heida is illusive. If something is illusive then it is unloved. If something is general then it is drizzly. All general things are wartlike. If something is unloved and wartlike then it is illusive. If Meaghan is unloved and Meaghan is wartlike then Meaghan is illusive. Kind things are illusive. Heida is not drizzly.", "logic": "\nWartlike(alysia)\nDrizzly(alysia)\nIllusive(alysia)\nWartlike(meaghan)\nDrizzly(meaghan)\nGiven(meaghan)\nGeneral(meaghan)\nWartlike(farand)\nUnloved(farand)\nReleasing(farand)\nGeneral(farand)\nIllusive(heida)\nforall x (Illusive(x) -> Unloved(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Drizzly(x))\nforall x (General(x) -> Wartlike(x))\nforall x (Unloved(x) and Wartlike(x) -> Illusive(x))\nUnloved(meaghan) and Wartlike(meaghan) -> Illusive(meaghan)\nforall x (Unloved(x) -> Illusive(x))\n\nnot Drizzly(heida)\n\nforall x (General(x) -> Drizzly(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "Ilse is bladelike. Ilse is wriggly. Ilse is finical. Maryjane is bladelike. Maryjane is wriggly. Maryjane is available. Maryjane is cytotoxic. Hephzibah is bladelike. Hephzibah is happy. Hephzibah is suffusive. Hephzibah is cytotoxic. Ceciley is finical. If something is finical then it is happy. If something is cytotoxic then it is wriggly. All cytotoxic things are bladelike. If something is happy and bladelike then it is finical. If Maryjane is happy and Maryjane is bladelike then Maryjane is finical. Kind things are finical. Ceciley is bladelike.", "logic": "\nBladelike(ilse)\nWriggly(ilse)\nFinical(ilse)\nBladelike(maryjane)\nWriggly(maryjane)\nAvailable(maryjane)\nCytotoxic(maryjane)\nBladelike(hephzibah)\nHappy(hephzibah)\nSuffusive(hephzibah)\nCytotoxic(hephzibah)\nFinical(ceciley)\nforall x (Finical(x) -> Happy(x))\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Wriggly(x))\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Bladelike(x))\nforall x (Happy(x) and Bladelike(x) -> Finical(x))\nHappy(maryjane) and Bladelike(maryjane) -> Finical(maryjane)\nforall x (Happy(x) -> Finical(x))\n\nBladelike(ceciley)\n\nforall x (Cytotoxic(x) -> Bladelike(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "Jim is principal. Jim is tapering. Jim is weeklong. Malia is principal. Malia is tapering. Malia is nonnative. Malia is perilous. Deeann is principal. Deeann is franciscan. Deeann is hemal. Deeann is perilous. Tiphanie is weeklong. If something is weeklong then it is franciscan. If something is perilous then it is tapering. All perilous things are principal. If something is franciscan and principal then it is weeklong. If Malia is franciscan and Malia is principal then Malia is weeklong. Kind things are weeklong. Jim is not nonnative.", "logic": "\nPrincipal(jim)\nTapering(jim)\nWeeklong(jim)\nPrincipal(malia)\nTapering(malia)\nNonnative(malia)\nPerilous(malia)\nPrincipal(deeann)\nFranciscan(deeann)\nHemal(deeann)\nPerilous(deeann)\nWeeklong(tiphanie)\nforall x (Weeklong(x) -> Franciscan(x))\nforall x (Perilous(x) -> Tapering(x))\nforall x (Perilous(x) -> Principal(x))\nforall x (Franciscan(x) and Principal(x) -> Weeklong(x))\nFranciscan(malia) and Principal(malia) -> Weeklong(malia)\nforall x (Franciscan(x) -> Weeklong(x))\n\nnot Nonnative(jim)\n\nnot Nonnative(jim) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "Quintina is unmanful. Quintina is uncaused. Quintina is countless. Aime is unmanful. Aime is uncaused. Aime is cliched. Aime is structural. Bambi is unmanful. Bambi is servile. Bambi is conveyable. Bambi is structural. Kee is countless. If something is countless then it is servile. If something is structural then it is uncaused. All structural things are unmanful. If something is servile and unmanful then it is countless. If Aime is servile and Aime is unmanful then Aime is countless. Kind things are countless. Kee is conveyable.", "logic": "\nUnmanful(quintina)\nUncaused(quintina)\nCountless(quintina)\nUnmanful(aime)\nUncaused(aime)\nCliched(aime)\nStructural(aime)\nUnmanful(bambi)\nServile(bambi)\nConveyable(bambi)\nStructural(bambi)\nCountless(kee)\nforall x (Countless(x) -> Servile(x))\nforall x (Structural(x) -> Uncaused(x))\nforall x (Structural(x) -> Unmanful(x))\nforall x (Servile(x) and Unmanful(x) -> Countless(x))\nServile(aime) and Unmanful(aime) -> Countless(aime)\nforall x (Servile(x) -> Countless(x))\n\nConveyable(kee)\n\nConveyable(kee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-3057"} {"premises": "The dani steamroll the alayne. The roxane steamroll the harli. The roxane occasion the alayne. The harli is nonfissile. The harli is workaday. The harli steamroll the roxane. The alayne steamroll the roxane. If someone is crackers and they need the alayne then they are footloose. If the roxane steamroll the dani then the dani is shaggy. If someone steamroll the harli then they need the dani. Blue people are not workaday. If someone occasion the roxane then they see the harli. If someone frap the dani then the dani does not need the alayne. If someone steamroll the alayne and they do not need the dani then the dani steamroll the roxane. If someone steamroll the roxane and they are not shaggy then they are nonfissile. The harli is workaday.", "logic": "\nSteamroll(dani, alayne)\nSteamroll(roxane, harli)\nOccasion(roxane, alayne)\nNonfissile(harli)\nWorkaday(harli)\nSteamroll(harli, roxane)\nSteamroll(alayne, roxane)\nforall x (Crackers(x) and Steamroll(x, alayne) -> Footloose(x))\nSteamroll(roxane, dani) -> Shaggy(dani)\nforall x (Steamroll(x, harli) -> Steamroll(x, dani))\nforall x (Shaggy(x) -> not Workaday(x))\nforall x (Occasion(x, roxane) -> Occasion(x, harli))\nforall x (Frap(x, dani) -> not Steamroll(dani, alayne))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, alayne) and not Steamroll(x, dani) -> Steamroll(dani, roxane))\nforall x (Steamroll(x, roxane) and not Shaggy(x) -> Nonfissile(x))\n\nWorkaday(harli)\n\ntherefore Workaday(harli)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The joslyn repugn the roanne. The hamilton repugn the marlo. The hamilton interdict the roanne. The marlo is inexplicit. The marlo is fanged. The marlo repugn the hamilton. The roanne repugn the hamilton. If someone is roumanian and they need the roanne then they are levitical. If the hamilton repugn the joslyn then the joslyn is custodial. If someone repugn the marlo then they need the joslyn. Blue people are not fanged. If someone interdict the hamilton then they see the marlo. If someone creak the joslyn then the joslyn does not need the roanne. If someone repugn the roanne and they do not need the joslyn then the joslyn repugn the hamilton. If someone repugn the hamilton and they are not custodial then they are inexplicit. The roanne does not need the hamilton.", "logic": "\nRepugn(joslyn, roanne)\nRepugn(hamilton, marlo)\nInterdict(hamilton, roanne)\nInexplicit(marlo)\nFanged(marlo)\nRepugn(marlo, hamilton)\nRepugn(roanne, hamilton)\nforall x (Roumanian(x) and Repugn(x, roanne) -> Levitical(x))\nRepugn(hamilton, joslyn) -> Custodial(joslyn)\nforall x (Repugn(x, marlo) -> Repugn(x, joslyn))\nforall x (Custodial(x) -> not Fanged(x))\nforall x (Interdict(x, hamilton) -> Interdict(x, marlo))\nforall x (Creak(x, joslyn) -> not Repugn(joslyn, roanne))\nforall x (Repugn(x, roanne) and not Repugn(x, joslyn) -> Repugn(joslyn, hamilton))\nforall x (Repugn(x, hamilton) and not Custodial(x) -> Inexplicit(x))\n\nnot Repugn(roanne, hamilton)\n\ntherefore Repugn(roanne, hamilton)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The olwen whiteout the lissa. The ermina whiteout the kourtney. The ermina actualise the lissa. The kourtney is xlvi. The kourtney is epidermal. The kourtney whiteout the ermina. The lissa whiteout the ermina. If someone is pernickety and they need the lissa then they are meatless. If the ermina whiteout the olwen then the olwen is stimulant. If someone whiteout the kourtney then they need the olwen. Blue people are not epidermal. If someone actualise the ermina then they see the kourtney. If someone symmetrize the olwen then the olwen does not need the lissa. If someone whiteout the lissa and they do not need the olwen then the olwen whiteout the ermina. If someone whiteout the ermina and they are not stimulant then they are xlvi. The ermina whiteout the olwen.", "logic": "\nWhiteout(olwen, lissa)\nWhiteout(ermina, kourtney)\nActualise(ermina, lissa)\nXlvi(kourtney)\nEpidermal(kourtney)\nWhiteout(kourtney, ermina)\nWhiteout(lissa, ermina)\nforall x (Pernickety(x) and Whiteout(x, lissa) -> Meatless(x))\nWhiteout(ermina, olwen) -> Stimulant(olwen)\nforall x (Whiteout(x, kourtney) -> Whiteout(x, olwen))\nforall x (Stimulant(x) -> not Epidermal(x))\nforall x (Actualise(x, ermina) -> Actualise(x, kourtney))\nforall x (Symmetrize(x, olwen) -> not Whiteout(olwen, lissa))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, lissa) and not Whiteout(x, olwen) -> Whiteout(olwen, ermina))\nforall x (Whiteout(x, ermina) and not Stimulant(x) -> Xlvi(x))\n\nWhiteout(ermina, olwen)\n\nWhiteout(ermina, kourtney) and forall x (Whiteout(x, kourtney) -> Whiteout(x, olwen)) -> therefore Whiteout(ermina, olwen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The abagael thread the marsh. The kirbee thread the delphinia. The kirbee antique the marsh. The delphinia is vaporish. The delphinia is nonnomadic. The delphinia thread the kirbee. The marsh thread the kirbee. If someone is abomasal and they need the marsh then they are pixilated. If the kirbee thread the abagael then the abagael is ashamed. If someone thread the delphinia then they need the abagael. Blue people are not nonnomadic. If someone antique the kirbee then they see the delphinia. If someone stipulate the abagael then the abagael does not need the marsh. If someone thread the marsh and they do not need the abagael then the abagael thread the kirbee. If someone thread the kirbee and they are not ashamed then they are vaporish. The kirbee does not need the abagael.", "logic": "\nThread(abagael, marsh)\nThread(kirbee, delphinia)\nAntique(kirbee, marsh)\nVaporish(delphinia)\nNonnomadic(delphinia)\nThread(delphinia, kirbee)\nThread(marsh, kirbee)\nforall x (Abomasal(x) and Thread(x, marsh) -> Pixilated(x))\nThread(kirbee, abagael) -> Ashamed(abagael)\nforall x (Thread(x, delphinia) -> Thread(x, abagael))\nforall x (Ashamed(x) -> not Nonnomadic(x))\nforall x (Antique(x, kirbee) -> Antique(x, delphinia))\nforall x (Stipulate(x, abagael) -> not Thread(abagael, marsh))\nforall x (Thread(x, marsh) and not Thread(x, abagael) -> Thread(abagael, kirbee))\nforall x (Thread(x, kirbee) and not Ashamed(x) -> Vaporish(x))\n\nnot Thread(kirbee, abagael)\n\nThread(kirbee, delphinia) and forall x (Thread(x, delphinia) -> Thread(x, abagael)) -> therefore Thread(kirbee, abagael)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The melvin disbar the garold. The diahann disbar the mendel. The diahann cripple the garold. The mendel is ethical. The mendel is redemptive. The mendel disbar the diahann. The garold disbar the diahann. If someone is unsung and they need the garold then they are frontmost. If the diahann disbar the melvin then the melvin is engrossing. If someone disbar the mendel then they need the melvin. Blue people are not redemptive. If someone cripple the diahann then they see the mendel. If someone initiate the melvin then the melvin does not need the garold. If someone disbar the garold and they do not need the melvin then the melvin disbar the diahann. If someone disbar the diahann and they are not engrossing then they are ethical. The melvin is engrossing.", "logic": "\nDisbar(melvin, garold)\nDisbar(diahann, mendel)\nCripple(diahann, garold)\nEthical(mendel)\nRedemptive(mendel)\nDisbar(mendel, diahann)\nDisbar(garold, diahann)\nforall x (Unsung(x) and Disbar(x, garold) -> Frontmost(x))\nDisbar(diahann, melvin) -> Engrossing(melvin)\nforall x (Disbar(x, mendel) -> Disbar(x, melvin))\nforall x (Engrossing(x) -> not Redemptive(x))\nforall x (Cripple(x, diahann) -> Cripple(x, mendel))\nforall x (Initiate(x, melvin) -> not Disbar(melvin, garold))\nforall x (Disbar(x, garold) and not Disbar(x, melvin) -> Disbar(melvin, diahann))\nforall x (Disbar(x, diahann) and not Engrossing(x) -> Ethical(x))\n\nEngrossing(melvin)\n\nDisbar(diahann, mendel) and forall x (Disbar(x, mendel) -> Disbar(x, melvin)) -> therefore Disbar(diahann, melvin) Disbar(diahann, melvin) and Disbar(diahann, melvin) -> Engrossing(melvin) -> therefore Engrossing(melvin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The eran post the arel. The jacinda post the aile. The jacinda canonize the arel. The aile is plane. The aile is nauseated. The aile post the jacinda. The arel post the jacinda. If someone is tannish and they need the arel then they are suborbital. If the jacinda post the eran then the eran is yucky. If someone post the aile then they need the eran. Blue people are not nauseated. If someone canonize the jacinda then they see the aile. If someone coalesce the eran then the eran does not need the arel. If someone post the arel and they do not need the eran then the eran post the jacinda. If someone post the jacinda and they are not yucky then they are plane. The eran is not yucky.", "logic": "\nPost(eran, arel)\nPost(jacinda, aile)\nCanonize(jacinda, arel)\nPlane(aile)\nNauseated(aile)\nPost(aile, jacinda)\nPost(arel, jacinda)\nforall x (Tannish(x) and Post(x, arel) -> Suborbital(x))\nPost(jacinda, eran) -> Yucky(eran)\nforall x (Post(x, aile) -> Post(x, eran))\nforall x (Yucky(x) -> not Nauseated(x))\nforall x (Canonize(x, jacinda) -> Canonize(x, aile))\nforall x (Coalesce(x, eran) -> not Post(eran, arel))\nforall x (Post(x, arel) and not Post(x, eran) -> Post(eran, jacinda))\nforall x (Post(x, jacinda) and not Yucky(x) -> Plane(x))\n\nnot Yucky(eran)\n\nPost(jacinda, aile) and forall x (Post(x, aile) -> Post(x, eran)) -> therefore Post(jacinda, eran) Post(jacinda, eran) and Post(jacinda, eran) -> Yucky(eran) -> therefore Yucky(eran)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The fredrika subsidise the vena. The winne subsidise the adeline. The winne uplift the vena. The adeline is negroid. The adeline is uniparous. The adeline subsidise the winne. The vena subsidise the winne. If someone is careless and they need the vena then they are soughing. If the winne subsidise the fredrika then the fredrika is implicated. If someone subsidise the adeline then they need the fredrika. Blue people are not uniparous. If someone uplift the winne then they see the adeline. If someone knit the fredrika then the fredrika does not need the vena. If someone subsidise the vena and they do not need the fredrika then the fredrika subsidise the winne. If someone subsidise the winne and they are not implicated then they are negroid. The fredrika is not uniparous.", "logic": "\nSubsidise(fredrika, vena)\nSubsidise(winne, adeline)\nUplift(winne, vena)\nNegroid(adeline)\nUniparous(adeline)\nSubsidise(adeline, winne)\nSubsidise(vena, winne)\nforall x (Careless(x) and Subsidise(x, vena) -> Soughing(x))\nSubsidise(winne, fredrika) -> Implicated(fredrika)\nforall x (Subsidise(x, adeline) -> Subsidise(x, fredrika))\nforall x (Implicated(x) -> not Uniparous(x))\nforall x (Uplift(x, winne) -> Uplift(x, adeline))\nforall x (Knit(x, fredrika) -> not Subsidise(fredrika, vena))\nforall x (Subsidise(x, vena) and not Subsidise(x, fredrika) -> Subsidise(fredrika, winne))\nforall x (Subsidise(x, winne) and not Implicated(x) -> Negroid(x))\n\nnot Uniparous(fredrika)\n\nSubsidise(winne, adeline) and forall x (Subsidise(x, adeline) -> Subsidise(x, fredrika)) -> therefore Subsidise(winne, fredrika) Subsidise(winne, fredrika) and Subsidise(winne, fredrika) -> Implicated(fredrika) -> therefore Implicated(fredrika) Implicated(fredrika) and forall x (Implicated(x) -> not Uniparous(x)) -> therefore not Uniparous(fredrika)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The geralda pole the kaster. The lowell pole the blair. The lowell macadamise the kaster. The blair is footed. The blair is fernlike. The blair pole the lowell. The kaster pole the lowell. If someone is wrongful and they need the kaster then they are coccal. If the lowell pole the geralda then the geralda is worthful. If someone pole the blair then they need the geralda. Blue people are not fernlike. If someone macadamise the lowell then they see the blair. If someone ratchet the geralda then the geralda does not need the kaster. If someone pole the kaster and they do not need the geralda then the geralda pole the lowell. If someone pole the lowell and they are not worthful then they are footed. The geralda is fernlike.", "logic": "\nPole(geralda, kaster)\nPole(lowell, blair)\nMacadamise(lowell, kaster)\nFooted(blair)\nFernlike(blair)\nPole(blair, lowell)\nPole(kaster, lowell)\nforall x (Wrongful(x) and Pole(x, kaster) -> Coccal(x))\nPole(lowell, geralda) -> Worthful(geralda)\nforall x (Pole(x, blair) -> Pole(x, geralda))\nforall x (Worthful(x) -> not Fernlike(x))\nforall x (Macadamise(x, lowell) -> Macadamise(x, blair))\nforall x (Ratchet(x, geralda) -> not Pole(geralda, kaster))\nforall x (Pole(x, kaster) and not Pole(x, geralda) -> Pole(geralda, lowell))\nforall x (Pole(x, lowell) and not Worthful(x) -> Footed(x))\n\nFernlike(geralda)\n\nPole(lowell, blair) and forall x (Pole(x, blair) -> Pole(x, geralda)) -> therefore Pole(lowell, geralda) Pole(lowell, geralda) and Pole(lowell, geralda) -> Worthful(geralda) -> therefore Worthful(geralda) Worthful(geralda) and forall x (Worthful(x) -> not Fernlike(x)) -> therefore not Fernlike(geralda)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The bret diversify the elwyn. The catharine diversify the myrtice. The catharine comprehend the elwyn. The myrtice is compulsive. The myrtice is singsong. The myrtice diversify the catharine. The elwyn diversify the catharine. If someone is teenaged and they need the elwyn then they are rambling. If the catharine diversify the bret then the bret is theistic. If someone diversify the myrtice then they need the bret. Blue people are not singsong. If someone comprehend the catharine then they see the myrtice. If someone suffocate the bret then the bret does not need the elwyn. If someone diversify the elwyn and they do not need the bret then the bret diversify the catharine. If someone diversify the catharine and they are not theistic then they are compulsive. The catharine is not compulsive.", "logic": "\nDiversify(bret, elwyn)\nDiversify(catharine, myrtice)\nComprehend(catharine, elwyn)\nCompulsive(myrtice)\nSingsong(myrtice)\nDiversify(myrtice, catharine)\nDiversify(elwyn, catharine)\nforall x (Teenaged(x) and Diversify(x, elwyn) -> Rambling(x))\nDiversify(catharine, bret) -> Theistic(bret)\nforall x (Diversify(x, myrtice) -> Diversify(x, bret))\nforall x (Theistic(x) -> not Singsong(x))\nforall x (Comprehend(x, catharine) -> Comprehend(x, myrtice))\nforall x (Suffocate(x, bret) -> not Diversify(bret, elwyn))\nforall x (Diversify(x, elwyn) and not Diversify(x, bret) -> Diversify(bret, catharine))\nforall x (Diversify(x, catharine) and not Theistic(x) -> Compulsive(x))\n\nnot Compulsive(catharine)\n\nforall x (Diversify(x, catharine) and not Theistic(x) -> Compulsive(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The mona narcotise the sawyer. The karlotta narcotise the welch. The karlotta blether the sawyer. The welch is watercress. The welch is perishable. The welch narcotise the karlotta. The sawyer narcotise the karlotta. If someone is ciliary and they need the sawyer then they are uncool. If the karlotta narcotise the mona then the mona is stocky. If someone narcotise the welch then they need the mona. Blue people are not perishable. If someone blether the karlotta then they see the welch. If someone romanize the mona then the mona does not need the sawyer. If someone narcotise the sawyer and they do not need the mona then the mona narcotise the karlotta. If someone narcotise the karlotta and they are not stocky then they are watercress. The welch is uncool.", "logic": "\nNarcotise(mona, sawyer)\nNarcotise(karlotta, welch)\nBlether(karlotta, sawyer)\nWatercress(welch)\nPerishable(welch)\nNarcotise(welch, karlotta)\nNarcotise(sawyer, karlotta)\nforall x (Ciliary(x) and Narcotise(x, sawyer) -> Uncool(x))\nNarcotise(karlotta, mona) -> Stocky(mona)\nforall x (Narcotise(x, welch) -> Narcotise(x, mona))\nforall x (Stocky(x) -> not Perishable(x))\nforall x (Blether(x, karlotta) -> Blether(x, welch))\nforall x (Romanize(x, mona) -> not Narcotise(mona, sawyer))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, sawyer) and not Narcotise(x, mona) -> Narcotise(mona, karlotta))\nforall x (Narcotise(x, karlotta) and not Stocky(x) -> Watercress(x))\n\nUncool(welch)\n\nforall x (Ciliary(x) and Narcotise(x, sawyer) -> Uncool(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The lynne disembody the flory. The monah disembody the fulvia. The monah shade the flory. The fulvia is outer. The fulvia is dismayed. The fulvia disembody the monah. The flory disembody the monah. If someone is unfettered and they need the flory then they are rueful. If the monah disembody the lynne then the lynne is blastemal. If someone disembody the fulvia then they need the lynne. Blue people are not dismayed. If someone shade the monah then they see the fulvia. If someone disown the lynne then the lynne does not need the flory. If someone disembody the flory and they do not need the lynne then the lynne disembody the monah. If someone disembody the monah and they are not blastemal then they are outer. The lynne is not outer.", "logic": "\nDisembody(lynne, flory)\nDisembody(monah, fulvia)\nShade(monah, flory)\nOuter(fulvia)\nDismayed(fulvia)\nDisembody(fulvia, monah)\nDisembody(flory, monah)\nforall x (Unfettered(x) and Disembody(x, flory) -> Rueful(x))\nDisembody(monah, lynne) -> Blastemal(lynne)\nforall x (Disembody(x, fulvia) -> Disembody(x, lynne))\nforall x (Blastemal(x) -> not Dismayed(x))\nforall x (Shade(x, monah) -> Shade(x, fulvia))\nforall x (Disown(x, lynne) -> not Disembody(lynne, flory))\nforall x (Disembody(x, flory) and not Disembody(x, lynne) -> Disembody(lynne, monah))\nforall x (Disembody(x, monah) and not Blastemal(x) -> Outer(x))\n\nnot Outer(lynne)\n\nforall x (Disembody(x, monah) and not Blastemal(x) -> Outer(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The bendite defer the darien. The rosalia defer the ebba. The rosalia gain the darien. The ebba is flaring. The ebba is stinting. The ebba defer the rosalia. The darien defer the rosalia. If someone is sugary and they need the darien then they are appraising. If the rosalia defer the bendite then the bendite is photic. If someone defer the ebba then they need the bendite. Blue people are not stinting. If someone gain the rosalia then they see the ebba. If someone adumbrate the bendite then the bendite does not need the darien. If someone defer the darien and they do not need the bendite then the bendite defer the rosalia. If someone defer the rosalia and they are not photic then they are flaring. The bendite defer the bendite.", "logic": "\nDefer(bendite, darien)\nDefer(rosalia, ebba)\nGain(rosalia, darien)\nFlaring(ebba)\nStinting(ebba)\nDefer(ebba, rosalia)\nDefer(darien, rosalia)\nforall x (Sugary(x) and Defer(x, darien) -> Appraising(x))\nDefer(rosalia, bendite) -> Photic(bendite)\nforall x (Defer(x, ebba) -> Defer(x, bendite))\nforall x (Photic(x) -> not Stinting(x))\nforall x (Gain(x, rosalia) -> Gain(x, ebba))\nforall x (Adumbrate(x, bendite) -> not Defer(bendite, darien))\nforall x (Defer(x, darien) and not Defer(x, bendite) -> Defer(bendite, rosalia))\nforall x (Defer(x, rosalia) and not Photic(x) -> Flaring(x))\n\nDefer(bendite, bendite)\n\nforall x (Defer(x, ebba) -> Defer(x, bendite)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The genny numb the inesita. The eyde numb the lorna. The eyde jeopardize the inesita. The lorna is gratuitous. The lorna is arching. The lorna numb the eyde. The inesita numb the eyde. If someone is areolar and they need the inesita then they are ferrous. If the eyde numb the genny then the genny is connubial. If someone numb the lorna then they need the genny. Blue people are not arching. If someone jeopardize the eyde then they see the lorna. If someone piddle the genny then the genny does not need the inesita. If someone numb the inesita and they do not need the genny then the genny numb the eyde. If someone numb the eyde and they are not connubial then they are gratuitous. The lorna does not need the lorna.", "logic": "\nNumb(genny, inesita)\nNumb(eyde, lorna)\nJeopardize(eyde, inesita)\nGratuitous(lorna)\nArching(lorna)\nNumb(lorna, eyde)\nNumb(inesita, eyde)\nforall x (Areolar(x) and Numb(x, inesita) -> Ferrous(x))\nNumb(eyde, genny) -> Connubial(genny)\nforall x (Numb(x, lorna) -> Numb(x, genny))\nforall x (Connubial(x) -> not Arching(x))\nforall x (Jeopardize(x, eyde) -> Jeopardize(x, lorna))\nforall x (Piddle(x, genny) -> not Numb(genny, inesita))\nforall x (Numb(x, inesita) and not Numb(x, genny) -> Numb(genny, eyde))\nforall x (Numb(x, eyde) and not Connubial(x) -> Gratuitous(x))\n\nnot Numb(lorna, lorna)\n\nnot Numb(lorna, lorna) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The lucas bombard the rheba. The karim bombard the jemmy. The karim lend the rheba. The jemmy is asserting. The jemmy is prolate. The jemmy bombard the karim. The rheba bombard the karim. If someone is dolourous and they need the rheba then they are unsavoury. If the karim bombard the lucas then the lucas is dual. If someone bombard the jemmy then they need the lucas. Blue people are not prolate. If someone lend the karim then they see the jemmy. If someone outrange the lucas then the lucas does not need the rheba. If someone bombard the rheba and they do not need the lucas then the lucas bombard the karim. If someone bombard the karim and they are not dual then they are asserting. The jemmy outrange the rheba.", "logic": "\nBombard(lucas, rheba)\nBombard(karim, jemmy)\nLend(karim, rheba)\nAsserting(jemmy)\nProlate(jemmy)\nBombard(jemmy, karim)\nBombard(rheba, karim)\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Bombard(x, rheba) -> Unsavoury(x))\nBombard(karim, lucas) -> Dual(lucas)\nforall x (Bombard(x, jemmy) -> Bombard(x, lucas))\nforall x (Dual(x) -> not Prolate(x))\nforall x (Lend(x, karim) -> Lend(x, jemmy))\nforall x (Outrange(x, lucas) -> not Bombard(lucas, rheba))\nforall x (Bombard(x, rheba) and not Bombard(x, lucas) -> Bombard(lucas, karim))\nforall x (Bombard(x, karim) and not Dual(x) -> Asserting(x))\n\nOutrange(jemmy, rheba)\n\nOutrange(jemmy, rheba) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The marya dizzy the rianon. The ursola dizzy the morgen. The ursola convoke the rianon. The morgen is blustering. The morgen is plaguy. The morgen dizzy the ursola. The rianon dizzy the ursola. If someone is anagogic and they need the rianon then they are forficate. If the ursola dizzy the marya then the marya is untoothed. If someone dizzy the morgen then they need the marya. Blue people are not plaguy. If someone convoke the ursola then they see the morgen. If someone secrete the marya then the marya does not need the rianon. If someone dizzy the rianon and they do not need the marya then the marya dizzy the ursola. If someone dizzy the ursola and they are not untoothed then they are blustering. The morgen does not eat the ursola.", "logic": "\nDizzy(marya, rianon)\nDizzy(ursola, morgen)\nConvoke(ursola, rianon)\nBlustering(morgen)\nPlaguy(morgen)\nDizzy(morgen, ursola)\nDizzy(rianon, ursola)\nforall x (Anagogic(x) and Dizzy(x, rianon) -> Forficate(x))\nDizzy(ursola, marya) -> Untoothed(marya)\nforall x (Dizzy(x, morgen) -> Dizzy(x, marya))\nforall x (Untoothed(x) -> not Plaguy(x))\nforall x (Convoke(x, ursola) -> Convoke(x, morgen))\nforall x (Secrete(x, marya) -> not Dizzy(marya, rianon))\nforall x (Dizzy(x, rianon) and not Dizzy(x, marya) -> Dizzy(marya, ursola))\nforall x (Dizzy(x, ursola) and not Untoothed(x) -> Blustering(x))\n\nnot Secrete(morgen, ursola)\n\nnot Secrete(morgen, ursola) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "The elliot mercerise the hortense. The mariya mercerise the cherise. The mariya macrame the hortense. The cherise is liquefied. The cherise is brickly. The cherise mercerise the mariya. The hortense mercerise the mariya. If someone is mazy and they need the hortense then they are adapted. If the mariya mercerise the elliot then the elliot is grumbling. If someone mercerise the cherise then they need the elliot. Blue people are not brickly. If someone macrame the mariya then they see the cherise. If someone assign the elliot then the elliot does not need the hortense. If someone mercerise the hortense and they do not need the elliot then the elliot mercerise the mariya. If someone mercerise the mariya and they are not grumbling then they are liquefied. The cherise macrame the hortense.", "logic": "\nMercerise(elliot, hortense)\nMercerise(mariya, cherise)\nMacrame(mariya, hortense)\nLiquefied(cherise)\nBrickly(cherise)\nMercerise(cherise, mariya)\nMercerise(hortense, mariya)\nforall x (Mazy(x) and Mercerise(x, hortense) -> Adapted(x))\nMercerise(mariya, elliot) -> Grumbling(elliot)\nforall x (Mercerise(x, cherise) -> Mercerise(x, elliot))\nforall x (Grumbling(x) -> not Brickly(x))\nforall x (Macrame(x, mariya) -> Macrame(x, cherise))\nforall x (Assign(x, elliot) -> not Mercerise(elliot, hortense))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, hortense) and not Mercerise(x, elliot) -> Mercerise(elliot, mariya))\nforall x (Mercerise(x, mariya) and not Grumbling(x) -> Liquefied(x))\n\nMacrame(cherise, hortense)\n\nMacrame(cherise, hortense) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-369"} {"premises": "Gillian is grizzly. Haydon is arenaceous. All grizzly people are loyal. If someone is loyal then they are aromatic. If Gillian is fecal then Gillian is loyal. Gillian is grizzly.", "logic": "\nGrizzly(gillian)\nArenaceous(haydon)\nforall x (Grizzly(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Aromatic(x))\nFecal(gillian) -> Loyal(gillian)\n\nGrizzly(gillian)\n\ntherefore Grizzly(gillian)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "Tanya is somnolent. Grant is mass. All somnolent people are forensic. If someone is forensic then they are confusing. If Tanya is pareve then Tanya is forensic. Tanya is not somnolent.", "logic": "\nSomnolent(tanya)\nMass(grant)\nforall x (Somnolent(x) -> Forensic(x))\nforall x (Forensic(x) -> Confusing(x))\nPareve(tanya) -> Forensic(tanya)\n\nnot Somnolent(tanya)\n\ntherefore Somnolent(tanya)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "Constanta is overt. Roxane is interested. All overt people are sorrel. If someone is sorrel then they are agleam. If Constanta is sufferable then Constanta is sorrel. Constanta is sorrel.", "logic": "\nOvert(constanta)\nInterested(roxane)\nforall x (Overt(x) -> Sorrel(x))\nforall x (Sorrel(x) -> Agleam(x))\nSufferable(constanta) -> Sorrel(constanta)\n\nSorrel(constanta)\n\nOvert(constanta) and forall x (Overt(x) -> Sorrel(x)) -> therefore Sorrel(constanta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "Cristal is relaxed. Carolynn is mutinous. All relaxed people are stigmatic. If someone is stigmatic then they are disclosed. If Cristal is ninety then Cristal is stigmatic. Cristal is not stigmatic.", "logic": "\nRelaxed(cristal)\nMutinous(carolynn)\nforall x (Relaxed(x) -> Stigmatic(x))\nforall x (Stigmatic(x) -> Disclosed(x))\nNinety(cristal) -> Stigmatic(cristal)\n\nnot Stigmatic(cristal)\n\nRelaxed(cristal) and forall x (Relaxed(x) -> Stigmatic(x)) -> therefore Stigmatic(cristal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "Leon is gaunt. Yvette is seated. All gaunt people are unloving. If someone is unloving then they are unavenged. If Leon is jangly then Leon is unloving. Yvette is not unavenged.", "logic": "\nGaunt(leon)\nSeated(yvette)\nforall x (Gaunt(x) -> Unloving(x))\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Unavenged(x))\nJangly(leon) -> Unloving(leon)\n\nnot Unavenged(yvette)\n\nforall x (Unloving(x) -> Unavenged(x)) <- forall x (Gaunt(x) -> Unloving(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "Cariotta is concealing. Guido is extravert. All concealing people are groping. If someone is groping then they are buccal. If Cariotta is tabby then Cariotta is groping. Guido is groping.", "logic": "\nConcealing(cariotta)\nExtravert(guido)\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Groping(x))\nforall x (Groping(x) -> Buccal(x))\nTabby(cariotta) -> Groping(cariotta)\n\nGroping(guido)\n\nforall x (Concealing(x) -> Groping(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "James is prevalent. Ronica is prakritic. All prevalent people are unalarming. If someone is unalarming then they are clanging. If James is lxxxviii then James is unalarming. Ronica is not white.", "logic": "\nPrevalent(james)\nPrakritic(ronica)\nforall x (Prevalent(x) -> Unalarming(x))\nforall x (Unalarming(x) -> Clanging(x))\nLxxxviii(james) -> Unalarming(james)\n\nnot White(ronica)\n\nnot White(ronica) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "Dulciana is hipped. Cabrina is stormproof. All hipped people are cleft. If someone is cleft then they are scheming. If Dulciana is springlike then Dulciana is cleft. Dulciana is blue.", "logic": "\nHipped(dulciana)\nStormproof(cabrina)\nforall x (Hipped(x) -> Cleft(x))\nforall x (Cleft(x) -> Scheming(x))\nSpringlike(dulciana) -> Cleft(dulciana)\n\nBlue(dulciana)\n\nBlue(dulciana) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D1-755"} {"premises": "The britaney is pretend. The bette caption the britaney. The tiler is redux. If the bette caption the britaney then the britaney keep the bette. If someone keep the bette then the bette annoy the tiler. The tiler is redux.", "logic": "\nPretend(britaney)\nCaption(bette, britaney)\nRedux(tiler)\nCaption(bette, britaney) -> Keep(britaney, bette)\nforall x (Keep(x, bette) -> Annoy(bette, tiler))\n\nRedux(tiler)\n\ntherefore Redux(tiler)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The addie is floored. The barnie thrum the addie. The pen is brownish. If the barnie thrum the addie then the addie replenish the barnie. If someone replenish the barnie then the barnie wharf the pen. The addie is not floored.", "logic": "\nFloored(addie)\nThrum(barnie, addie)\nBrownish(pen)\nThrum(barnie, addie) -> Replenish(addie, barnie)\nforall x (Replenish(x, barnie) -> Wharf(barnie, pen))\n\nnot Floored(addie)\n\ntherefore Floored(addie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The marisa is ninth. The celesta opalize the marisa. The celestia is separative. If the celesta opalize the marisa then the marisa pose the celesta. If someone pose the celesta then the celesta revile the celestia. The marisa pose the celesta.", "logic": "\nNinth(marisa)\nOpalize(celesta, marisa)\nSeparative(celestia)\nOpalize(celesta, marisa) -> Pose(marisa, celesta)\nforall x (Pose(x, celesta) -> Revile(celesta, celestia))\n\nPose(marisa, celesta)\n\nOpalize(celesta, marisa) and Opalize(celesta, marisa) -> Pose(marisa, celesta) -> therefore Pose(marisa, celesta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The trudi is pleased. The ella camphorate the trudi. The mairead is leisurely. If the ella camphorate the trudi then the trudi pester the ella. If someone pester the ella then the ella caramelize the mairead. The trudi does not visit the ella.", "logic": "\nPleased(trudi)\nCamphorate(ella, trudi)\nLeisurely(mairead)\nCamphorate(ella, trudi) -> Pester(trudi, ella)\nforall x (Pester(x, ella) -> Caramelize(ella, mairead))\n\nnot Pester(trudi, ella)\n\nCamphorate(ella, trudi) and Camphorate(ella, trudi) -> Pester(trudi, ella) -> therefore Pester(trudi, ella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The zulema is horrifying. The ellwood hibachi the zulema. The britt is rooted. If the ellwood hibachi the zulema then the zulema liaise the ellwood. If someone liaise the ellwood then the ellwood preempt the britt. The ellwood preempt the britt.", "logic": "\nHorrifying(zulema)\nHibachi(ellwood, zulema)\nRooted(britt)\nHibachi(ellwood, zulema) -> Liaise(zulema, ellwood)\nforall x (Liaise(x, ellwood) -> Preempt(ellwood, britt))\n\nPreempt(ellwood, britt)\n\nHibachi(ellwood, zulema) and Hibachi(ellwood, zulema) -> Liaise(zulema, ellwood) -> therefore Liaise(zulema, ellwood) Liaise(zulema, ellwood) and forall x (Liaise(x, ellwood) -> Preempt(ellwood, britt)) -> therefore Preempt(ellwood, britt)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The kelley is subjugable. The andee debug the kelley. The brant is confounded. If the andee debug the kelley then the kelley cosign the andee. If someone cosign the andee then the andee fantasy the brant. The andee does not need the brant.", "logic": "\nSubjugable(kelley)\nDebug(andee, kelley)\nConfounded(brant)\nDebug(andee, kelley) -> Cosign(kelley, andee)\nforall x (Cosign(x, andee) -> Fantasy(andee, brant))\n\nnot Fantasy(andee, brant)\n\nDebug(andee, kelley) and Debug(andee, kelley) -> Cosign(kelley, andee) -> therefore Cosign(kelley, andee) Cosign(kelley, andee) and forall x (Cosign(x, andee) -> Fantasy(andee, brant)) -> therefore Fantasy(andee, brant)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The corenda is weighty. The jehanna report the corenda. The rivi is swimming. If the jehanna report the corenda then the corenda overreact the jehanna. If someone overreact the jehanna then the jehanna emphasise the rivi. The rivi does not visit the corenda.", "logic": "\nWeighty(corenda)\nReport(jehanna, corenda)\nSwimming(rivi)\nReport(jehanna, corenda) -> Overreact(corenda, jehanna)\nforall x (Overreact(x, jehanna) -> Emphasise(jehanna, rivi))\n\nnot Overreact(rivi, corenda)\n\nnot Overreact(rivi, corenda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The monique is accurate. The dorothee ammoniate the monique. The rakel is chylaceous. If the dorothee ammoniate the monique then the monique bald the dorothee. If someone bald the dorothee then the dorothee alarm the rakel. The rakel is blue.", "logic": "\nAccurate(monique)\nAmmoniate(dorothee, monique)\nChylaceous(rakel)\nAmmoniate(dorothee, monique) -> Bald(monique, dorothee)\nforall x (Bald(x, dorothee) -> Alarm(dorothee, rakel))\n\nBlue(rakel)\n\nBlue(rakel) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The goddard is cutaneal. The alasdair bleach the goddard. The rab is meiotic. If the alasdair bleach the goddard then the goddard elapse the alasdair. If someone elapse the alasdair then the alasdair strip the rab. The goddard does not visit the goddard.", "logic": "\nCutaneal(goddard)\nBleach(alasdair, goddard)\nMeiotic(rab)\nBleach(alasdair, goddard) -> Elapse(goddard, alasdair)\nforall x (Elapse(x, alasdair) -> Strip(alasdair, rab))\n\nnot Elapse(goddard, goddard)\n\nnot Elapse(goddard, goddard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The chantal is umteen. The hilbert philander the chantal. The cally is indefinite. If the hilbert philander the chantal then the chantal quadruple the hilbert. If someone quadruple the hilbert then the hilbert appraise the cally. The chantal philander the cally.", "logic": "\nUmteen(chantal)\nPhilander(hilbert, chantal)\nIndefinite(cally)\nPhilander(hilbert, chantal) -> Quadruple(chantal, hilbert)\nforall x (Quadruple(x, hilbert) -> Appraise(hilbert, cally))\n\nPhilander(chantal, cally)\n\nPhilander(chantal, cally) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The morly is incoming. The maribel perish the morly. The wheeler is eidetic. If the maribel perish the morly then the morly slip the maribel. If someone slip the maribel then the maribel stall the wheeler. The wheeler is not big.", "logic": "\nIncoming(morly)\nPerish(maribel, morly)\nEidetic(wheeler)\nPerish(maribel, morly) -> Slip(morly, maribel)\nforall x (Slip(x, maribel) -> Stall(maribel, wheeler))\n\nnot Big(wheeler)\n\nnot Big(wheeler) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "The chandal is choky. The bettine whelk the chandal. The baily is tricksy. If the bettine whelk the chandal then the chandal undercut the bettine. If someone undercut the bettine then the bettine uglify the baily. The baily whelk the chandal.", "logic": "\nChoky(chandal)\nWhelk(bettine, chandal)\nTricksy(baily)\nWhelk(bettine, chandal) -> Undercut(chandal, bettine)\nforall x (Undercut(x, bettine) -> Uglify(bettine, baily))\n\nWhelk(baily, chandal)\n\nWhelk(baily, chandal) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D2-1721"} {"premises": "Cherrita is chafed. Cherrita is affordable. Cherrita is putrescent. Bernadina is allophonic. Bernadina is affordable. Bernadina is ferric. Bernadina is putrescent. Hiro is affordable. Hiro is precocial. Hiro is putrescent. If something is ferric then it is allophonic. If something is putrescent then it is tonsured. If Cherrita is tonsured and Cherrita is chafed then Cherrita is ferric. If something is affordable and putrescent then it is tonsured. If something is tonsured then it is affordable. Rough things are ferric. Bernadina is ferric.", "logic": "\nChafed(cherrita)\nAffordable(cherrita)\nPutrescent(cherrita)\nAllophonic(bernadina)\nAffordable(bernadina)\nFerric(bernadina)\nPutrescent(bernadina)\nAffordable(hiro)\nPrecocial(hiro)\nPutrescent(hiro)\nforall x (Ferric(x) -> Allophonic(x))\nforall x (Putrescent(x) -> Tonsured(x))\nTonsured(cherrita) and Chafed(cherrita) -> Ferric(cherrita)\nforall x (Affordable(x) and Putrescent(x) -> Tonsured(x))\nforall x (Tonsured(x) -> Affordable(x))\nforall x (Precocial(x) -> Ferric(x))\n\nFerric(bernadina)\n\ntherefore Ferric(bernadina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Conrad is metric. Conrad is agamous. Conrad is alkahestic. Katya is jaggy. Katya is agamous. Katya is pennate. Katya is alkahestic. Bridget is agamous. Bridget is epidural. Bridget is alkahestic. If something is pennate then it is jaggy. If something is alkahestic then it is dazzled. If Conrad is dazzled and Conrad is metric then Conrad is pennate. If something is agamous and alkahestic then it is dazzled. If something is dazzled then it is agamous. Rough things are pennate. Conrad is not agamous.", "logic": "\nMetric(conrad)\nAgamous(conrad)\nAlkahestic(conrad)\nJaggy(katya)\nAgamous(katya)\nPennate(katya)\nAlkahestic(katya)\nAgamous(bridget)\nEpidural(bridget)\nAlkahestic(bridget)\nforall x (Pennate(x) -> Jaggy(x))\nforall x (Alkahestic(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nDazzled(conrad) and Metric(conrad) -> Pennate(conrad)\nforall x (Agamous(x) and Alkahestic(x) -> Dazzled(x))\nforall x (Dazzled(x) -> Agamous(x))\nforall x (Epidural(x) -> Pennate(x))\n\nnot Agamous(conrad)\n\ntherefore Agamous(conrad)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Ludvig is enervating. Ludvig is ignored. Ludvig is well. Andonis is bacillar. Andonis is ignored. Andonis is pyknotic. Andonis is well. Rosalinde is ignored. Rosalinde is extended. Rosalinde is well. If something is pyknotic then it is bacillar. If something is well then it is skimmed. If Ludvig is skimmed and Ludvig is enervating then Ludvig is pyknotic. If something is ignored and well then it is skimmed. If something is skimmed then it is ignored. Rough things are pyknotic. Rosalinde is skimmed.", "logic": "\nEnervating(ludvig)\nIgnored(ludvig)\nWell(ludvig)\nBacillar(andonis)\nIgnored(andonis)\nPyknotic(andonis)\nWell(andonis)\nIgnored(rosalinde)\nExtended(rosalinde)\nWell(rosalinde)\nforall x (Pyknotic(x) -> Bacillar(x))\nforall x (Well(x) -> Skimmed(x))\nSkimmed(ludvig) and Enervating(ludvig) -> Pyknotic(ludvig)\nforall x (Ignored(x) and Well(x) -> Skimmed(x))\nforall x (Skimmed(x) -> Ignored(x))\nforall x (Extended(x) -> Pyknotic(x))\n\nSkimmed(rosalinde)\n\nWell(rosalinde) and forall x (Well(x) -> Skimmed(x)) -> therefore Skimmed(rosalinde)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Christoph is haggard. Christoph is phobic. Christoph is hurrying. Stacia is clenched. Stacia is phobic. Stacia is ectodermal. Stacia is hurrying. Craig is phobic. Craig is aeriform. Craig is hurrying. If something is ectodermal then it is clenched. If something is hurrying then it is runic. If Christoph is runic and Christoph is haggard then Christoph is ectodermal. If something is phobic and hurrying then it is runic. If something is runic then it is phobic. Rough things are ectodermal. Craig is not ectodermal.", "logic": "\nHaggard(christoph)\nPhobic(christoph)\nHurrying(christoph)\nClenched(stacia)\nPhobic(stacia)\nEctodermal(stacia)\nHurrying(stacia)\nPhobic(craig)\nAeriform(craig)\nHurrying(craig)\nforall x (Ectodermal(x) -> Clenched(x))\nforall x (Hurrying(x) -> Runic(x))\nRunic(christoph) and Haggard(christoph) -> Ectodermal(christoph)\nforall x (Phobic(x) and Hurrying(x) -> Runic(x))\nforall x (Runic(x) -> Phobic(x))\nforall x (Aeriform(x) -> Ectodermal(x))\n\nnot Ectodermal(craig)\n\nAeriform(craig) and forall x (Aeriform(x) -> Ectodermal(x)) -> therefore Ectodermal(craig)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Janice is edged. Janice is meshugga. Janice is untied. Isabella is uniate. Isabella is meshugga. Isabella is miraculous. Isabella is untied. Guido is meshugga. Guido is whacked. Guido is untied. If something is miraculous then it is uniate. If something is untied then it is highland. If Janice is highland and Janice is edged then Janice is miraculous. If something is meshugga and untied then it is highland. If something is highland then it is meshugga. Rough things are miraculous. Guido is uniate.", "logic": "\nEdged(janice)\nMeshugga(janice)\nUntied(janice)\nUniate(isabella)\nMeshugga(isabella)\nMiraculous(isabella)\nUntied(isabella)\nMeshugga(guido)\nWhacked(guido)\nUntied(guido)\nforall x (Miraculous(x) -> Uniate(x))\nforall x (Untied(x) -> Highland(x))\nHighland(janice) and Edged(janice) -> Miraculous(janice)\nforall x (Meshugga(x) and Untied(x) -> Highland(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Meshugga(x))\nforall x (Whacked(x) -> Miraculous(x))\n\nUniate(guido)\n\nWhacked(guido) and forall x (Whacked(x) -> Miraculous(x)) -> therefore Miraculous(guido) Miraculous(guido) and forall x (Miraculous(x) -> Uniate(x)) -> therefore Uniate(guido)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Jerri is nidifugous. Jerri is grasping. Jerri is gravelly. Hamid is roumanian. Hamid is grasping. Hamid is kindled. Hamid is gravelly. Carmelle is grasping. Carmelle is allied. Carmelle is gravelly. If something is kindled then it is roumanian. If something is gravelly then it is loyal. If Jerri is loyal and Jerri is nidifugous then Jerri is kindled. If something is grasping and gravelly then it is loyal. If something is loyal then it is grasping. Rough things are kindled. Jerri is not kindled.", "logic": "\nNidifugous(jerri)\nGrasping(jerri)\nGravelly(jerri)\nRoumanian(hamid)\nGrasping(hamid)\nKindled(hamid)\nGravelly(hamid)\nGrasping(carmelle)\nAllied(carmelle)\nGravelly(carmelle)\nforall x (Kindled(x) -> Roumanian(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Loyal(x))\nLoyal(jerri) and Nidifugous(jerri) -> Kindled(jerri)\nforall x (Grasping(x) and Gravelly(x) -> Loyal(x))\nforall x (Loyal(x) -> Grasping(x))\nforall x (Allied(x) -> Kindled(x))\n\nnot Kindled(jerri)\n\nGravelly(jerri) and forall x (Gravelly(x) -> Loyal(x)) -> therefore Loyal(jerri) Loyal(jerri) and Nidifugous(jerri) and Loyal(jerri) and Nidifugous(jerri) -> Kindled(jerri) -> therefore Kindled(jerri)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Jamie is modulated. Jamie is dimmed. Jamie is epilithic. Trixie is suffering. Trixie is dimmed. Trixie is bawdy. Trixie is epilithic. Gabriell is dimmed. Gabriell is handmade. Gabriell is epilithic. If something is bawdy then it is suffering. If something is epilithic then it is pharaonic. If Jamie is pharaonic and Jamie is modulated then Jamie is bawdy. If something is dimmed and epilithic then it is pharaonic. If something is pharaonic then it is dimmed. Rough things are bawdy. Jamie is suffering.", "logic": "\nModulated(jamie)\nDimmed(jamie)\nEpilithic(jamie)\nSuffering(trixie)\nDimmed(trixie)\nBawdy(trixie)\nEpilithic(trixie)\nDimmed(gabriell)\nHandmade(gabriell)\nEpilithic(gabriell)\nforall x (Bawdy(x) -> Suffering(x))\nforall x (Epilithic(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nPharaonic(jamie) and Modulated(jamie) -> Bawdy(jamie)\nforall x (Dimmed(x) and Epilithic(x) -> Pharaonic(x))\nforall x (Pharaonic(x) -> Dimmed(x))\nforall x (Handmade(x) -> Bawdy(x))\n\nSuffering(jamie)\n\nEpilithic(jamie) and forall x (Epilithic(x) -> Pharaonic(x)) -> therefore Pharaonic(jamie) Pharaonic(jamie) and Modulated(jamie) and Pharaonic(jamie) and Modulated(jamie) -> Bawdy(jamie) -> therefore Bawdy(jamie) Bawdy(jamie) and forall x (Bawdy(x) -> Suffering(x)) -> therefore Suffering(jamie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Katheryn is amnestic. Katheryn is truthful. Katheryn is cuban. Solomon is tainted. Solomon is truthful. Solomon is biaxate. Solomon is cuban. Fyodor is truthful. Fyodor is potbound. Fyodor is cuban. If something is biaxate then it is tainted. If something is cuban then it is synoecious. If Katheryn is synoecious and Katheryn is amnestic then Katheryn is biaxate. If something is truthful and cuban then it is synoecious. If something is synoecious then it is truthful. Rough things are biaxate. Katheryn is not tainted.", "logic": "\nAmnestic(katheryn)\nTruthful(katheryn)\nCuban(katheryn)\nTainted(solomon)\nTruthful(solomon)\nBiaxate(solomon)\nCuban(solomon)\nTruthful(fyodor)\nPotbound(fyodor)\nCuban(fyodor)\nforall x (Biaxate(x) -> Tainted(x))\nforall x (Cuban(x) -> Synoecious(x))\nSynoecious(katheryn) and Amnestic(katheryn) -> Biaxate(katheryn)\nforall x (Truthful(x) and Cuban(x) -> Synoecious(x))\nforall x (Synoecious(x) -> Truthful(x))\nforall x (Potbound(x) -> Biaxate(x))\n\nnot Tainted(katheryn)\n\nCuban(katheryn) and forall x (Cuban(x) -> Synoecious(x)) -> therefore Synoecious(katheryn) Synoecious(katheryn) and Amnestic(katheryn) and Synoecious(katheryn) and Amnestic(katheryn) -> Biaxate(katheryn) -> therefore Biaxate(katheryn) Biaxate(katheryn) and forall x (Biaxate(x) -> Tainted(x)) -> therefore Tainted(katheryn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Bronson is treasured. Bronson is ruttish. Bronson is scrappy. Reginald is boffo. Reginald is ruttish. Reginald is blooming. Reginald is scrappy. Olive is ruttish. Olive is undated. Olive is scrappy. If something is blooming then it is boffo. If something is scrappy then it is practised. If Bronson is practised and Bronson is treasured then Bronson is blooming. If something is ruttish and scrappy then it is practised. If something is practised then it is ruttish. Rough things are blooming. Bronson is not undated.", "logic": "\nTreasured(bronson)\nRuttish(bronson)\nScrappy(bronson)\nBoffo(reginald)\nRuttish(reginald)\nBlooming(reginald)\nScrappy(reginald)\nRuttish(olive)\nUndated(olive)\nScrappy(olive)\nforall x (Blooming(x) -> Boffo(x))\nforall x (Scrappy(x) -> Practised(x))\nPractised(bronson) and Treasured(bronson) -> Blooming(bronson)\nforall x (Ruttish(x) and Scrappy(x) -> Practised(x))\nforall x (Practised(x) -> Ruttish(x))\nforall x (Undated(x) -> Blooming(x))\n\nnot Undated(bronson)\n\nnot Undated(bronson) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Dominic is paired. Dominic is crinoid. Dominic is sacral. Liz is dosed. Liz is crinoid. Liz is preanal. Liz is sacral. Shawnee is crinoid. Shawnee is leafless. Shawnee is sacral. If something is preanal then it is dosed. If something is sacral then it is gentle. If Dominic is gentle and Dominic is paired then Dominic is preanal. If something is crinoid and sacral then it is gentle. If something is gentle then it is crinoid. Rough things are preanal. Shawnee is paired.", "logic": "\nPaired(dominic)\nCrinoid(dominic)\nSacral(dominic)\nDosed(liz)\nCrinoid(liz)\nPreanal(liz)\nSacral(liz)\nCrinoid(shawnee)\nLeafless(shawnee)\nSacral(shawnee)\nforall x (Preanal(x) -> Dosed(x))\nforall x (Sacral(x) -> Gentle(x))\nGentle(dominic) and Paired(dominic) -> Preanal(dominic)\nforall x (Crinoid(x) and Sacral(x) -> Gentle(x))\nforall x (Gentle(x) -> Crinoid(x))\nforall x (Leafless(x) -> Preanal(x))\n\nPaired(shawnee)\n\nPaired(shawnee) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Bill is oxonian. Bill is puffed. Bill is pudendal. Daveen is branchiate. Daveen is puffed. Daveen is boggy. Daveen is pudendal. Dwaine is puffed. Dwaine is exegetic. Dwaine is pudendal. If something is boggy then it is branchiate. If something is pudendal then it is resident. If Bill is resident and Bill is oxonian then Bill is boggy. If something is puffed and pudendal then it is resident. If something is resident then it is puffed. Rough things are boggy. Daveen is not oxonian.", "logic": "\nOxonian(bill)\nPuffed(bill)\nPudendal(bill)\nBranchiate(daveen)\nPuffed(daveen)\nBoggy(daveen)\nPudendal(daveen)\nPuffed(dwaine)\nExegetic(dwaine)\nPudendal(dwaine)\nforall x (Boggy(x) -> Branchiate(x))\nforall x (Pudendal(x) -> Resident(x))\nResident(bill) and Oxonian(bill) -> Boggy(bill)\nforall x (Puffed(x) and Pudendal(x) -> Resident(x))\nforall x (Resident(x) -> Puffed(x))\nforall x (Exegetic(x) -> Boggy(x))\n\nnot Oxonian(daveen)\n\nnot Oxonian(daveen) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Tamar is euphonous. Tamar is positivist. Tamar is cerous. Burt is illiberal. Burt is positivist. Burt is latinate. Burt is cerous. Myrtie is positivist. Myrtie is trilobated. Myrtie is cerous. If something is latinate then it is illiberal. If something is cerous then it is faded. If Tamar is faded and Tamar is euphonous then Tamar is latinate. If something is positivist and cerous then it is faded. If something is faded then it is positivist. Rough things are latinate. Burt is trilobated.", "logic": "\nEuphonous(tamar)\nPositivist(tamar)\nCerous(tamar)\nIlliberal(burt)\nPositivist(burt)\nLatinate(burt)\nCerous(burt)\nPositivist(myrtie)\nTrilobated(myrtie)\nCerous(myrtie)\nforall x (Latinate(x) -> Illiberal(x))\nforall x (Cerous(x) -> Faded(x))\nFaded(tamar) and Euphonous(tamar) -> Latinate(tamar)\nforall x (Positivist(x) and Cerous(x) -> Faded(x))\nforall x (Faded(x) -> Positivist(x))\nforall x (Trilobated(x) -> Latinate(x))\n\nTrilobated(burt)\n\nTrilobated(burt) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1453"} {"premises": "Grier is furled. Grier is repressing. Grier is auriform. Grier is ibsenian. Grier is cervical. Grier is bulbaceous. Grier is outermost. Merwin is furled. Merwin is repressing. Merwin is auriform. Merwin is ibsenian. Merwin is cervical. Merwin is bulbaceous. Merwin is outermost. Cold, outermost things are cervical. If something is bulbaceous and auriform then it is outermost. All ibsenian, auriform things are cervical. All cervical things are outermost. All auriform, outermost things are furled. All ibsenian, repressing things are auriform. Merwin is ibsenian.", "logic": "\nFurled(grier)\nRepressing(grier)\nAuriform(grier)\nIbsenian(grier)\nCervical(grier)\nBulbaceous(grier)\nOutermost(grier)\nFurled(merwin)\nRepressing(merwin)\nAuriform(merwin)\nIbsenian(merwin)\nCervical(merwin)\nBulbaceous(merwin)\nOutermost(merwin)\nforall x (Furled(x) and Outermost(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Bulbaceous(x) and Auriform(x) -> Outermost(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) and Auriform(x) -> Cervical(x))\nforall x (Cervical(x) -> Outermost(x))\nforall x (Auriform(x) and Outermost(x) -> Furled(x))\nforall x (Ibsenian(x) and Repressing(x) -> Auriform(x))\n\nIbsenian(merwin)\n\ntherefore Ibsenian(merwin)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5088"} {"premises": "Derrick is suctorial. Derrick is imbricate. Derrick is lined. Derrick is statutory. Derrick is botulinal. Derrick is wholemeal. Derrick is hatted. Kalil is suctorial. Kalil is imbricate. Kalil is lined. Kalil is statutory. Kalil is botulinal. Kalil is wholemeal. Kalil is hatted. Cold, hatted things are botulinal. If something is wholemeal and lined then it is hatted. All statutory, lined things are botulinal. All botulinal things are hatted. All lined, hatted things are suctorial. All statutory, imbricate things are lined. Derrick is not lined.", "logic": "\nSuctorial(derrick)\nImbricate(derrick)\nLined(derrick)\nStatutory(derrick)\nBotulinal(derrick)\nWholemeal(derrick)\nHatted(derrick)\nSuctorial(kalil)\nImbricate(kalil)\nLined(kalil)\nStatutory(kalil)\nBotulinal(kalil)\nWholemeal(kalil)\nHatted(kalil)\nforall x (Suctorial(x) and Hatted(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Wholemeal(x) and Lined(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Statutory(x) and Lined(x) -> Botulinal(x))\nforall x (Botulinal(x) -> Hatted(x))\nforall x (Lined(x) and Hatted(x) -> Suctorial(x))\nforall x (Statutory(x) and Imbricate(x) -> Lined(x))\n\nnot Lined(derrick)\n\ntherefore Lined(derrick)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-5088"} {"premises": "The cain is incidental. The cain desecrate the marchelle. The arielle pillory the marchelle. The arielle is stunning. The arielle is incidental. The arielle shrink the marchelle. The marchelle shrink the arielle. If someone is incidental and flighty then they chase the arielle. If someone desecrate the cain and they like the marchelle then the cain pillory the marchelle. The cain is incidental.", "logic": "\nIncidental(cain)\nDesecrate(cain, marchelle)\nPillory(arielle, marchelle)\nStunning(arielle)\nIncidental(arielle)\nShrink(arielle, marchelle)\nShrink(marchelle, arielle)\nforall x (Incidental(x) and Flighty(x) -> Pillory(x, arielle))\nforall x (Desecrate(x, cain) and Desecrate(x, marchelle) -> Pillory(cain, marchelle))\n\nIncidental(cain)\n\ntherefore Incidental(cain)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4895"} {"premises": "The ora is coeval. The ora reproach the geraldo. The ardra conge the geraldo. The ardra is clashing. The ardra is coeval. The ardra resettle the geraldo. The geraldo resettle the ardra. If someone is coeval and humane then they chase the ardra. If someone reproach the ora and they like the geraldo then the ora conge the geraldo. The ardra does not need the geraldo.", "logic": "\nCoeval(ora)\nReproach(ora, geraldo)\nConge(ardra, geraldo)\nClashing(ardra)\nCoeval(ardra)\nResettle(ardra, geraldo)\nResettle(geraldo, ardra)\nforall x (Coeval(x) and Humane(x) -> Conge(x, ardra))\nforall x (Reproach(x, ora) and Reproach(x, geraldo) -> Conge(ora, geraldo))\n\nnot Resettle(ardra, geraldo)\n\ntherefore Resettle(ardra, geraldo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4895"} {"premises": "The ricky is chic. The ricky picture the jed. The kerri barnstorm the jed. The kerri is auxetic. The kerri is chic. The kerri crawfish the jed. The jed crawfish the kerri. If someone is chic and akimbo then they chase the kerri. If someone picture the ricky and they like the jed then the ricky barnstorm the jed. The jed does not chase the kerri.", "logic": "\nChic(ricky)\nPicture(ricky, jed)\nBarnstorm(kerri, jed)\nAuxetic(kerri)\nChic(kerri)\nCrawfish(kerri, jed)\nCrawfish(jed, kerri)\nforall x (Chic(x) and Akimbo(x) -> Barnstorm(x, kerri))\nforall x (Picture(x, ricky) and Picture(x, jed) -> Barnstorm(ricky, jed))\n\nnot Barnstorm(jed, kerri)\n\nforall x (Chic(x) and Akimbo(x) -> Barnstorm(x, kerri)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4895"} {"premises": "The francisco is nutlike. The francisco baste the stephanus. The dylan filibuster the stephanus. The dylan is somali. The dylan is nutlike. The dylan sunder the stephanus. The stephanus sunder the dylan. If someone is nutlike and descendent then they chase the dylan. If someone baste the francisco and they like the stephanus then the francisco filibuster the stephanus. The dylan is descendent.", "logic": "\nNutlike(francisco)\nBaste(francisco, stephanus)\nFilibuster(dylan, stephanus)\nSomali(dylan)\nNutlike(dylan)\nSunder(dylan, stephanus)\nSunder(stephanus, dylan)\nforall x (Nutlike(x) and Descendent(x) -> Filibuster(x, dylan))\nforall x (Baste(x, francisco) and Baste(x, stephanus) -> Filibuster(francisco, stephanus))\n\nDescendent(dylan)\n\nDescendent(dylan) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-4895"} {"premises": "Guenna is sovereign. Guenna is cackly. Guenna is bovine. Guenna is midmost. Guenna is unblinking. Allsun is cackly. Allsun is bovine. White, unblinking things are nordic. White things are nordic. If Guenna is unblinking and Guenna is nordic then Guenna is cackly. Guenna is cackly.", "logic": "\nSovereign(guenna)\nCackly(guenna)\nBovine(guenna)\nMidmost(guenna)\nUnblinking(guenna)\nCackly(allsun)\nBovine(allsun)\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) and Unblinking(x) -> Nordic(x))\nforall x (Hypaethral(x) -> Nordic(x))\nUnblinking(guenna) and Nordic(guenna) -> Cackly(guenna)\n\nCackly(guenna)\n\ntherefore Cackly(guenna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2463"} {"premises": "Garth is voiceless. Garth is symphonic. Garth is retired. Garth is punic. Garth is feminine. Melony is symphonic. Melony is retired. White, feminine things are erectile. White things are erectile. If Garth is feminine and Garth is erectile then Garth is symphonic. Melony is not retired.", "logic": "\nVoiceless(garth)\nSymphonic(garth)\nRetired(garth)\nPunic(garth)\nFeminine(garth)\nSymphonic(melony)\nRetired(melony)\nforall x (Quotidian(x) and Feminine(x) -> Erectile(x))\nforall x (Quotidian(x) -> Erectile(x))\nFeminine(garth) and Erectile(garth) -> Symphonic(garth)\n\nnot Retired(melony)\n\ntherefore Retired(melony)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2463"} {"premises": "Werner is eared. Werner is unexciting. Werner is anginous. Werner is pinchbeck. Werner is hegelian. Marge is unexciting. Marge is anginous. White, hegelian things are inland. White things are inland. If Werner is hegelian and Werner is inland then Werner is unexciting. Marge is not inland.", "logic": "\nEared(werner)\nUnexciting(werner)\nAnginous(werner)\nPinchbeck(werner)\nHegelian(werner)\nUnexciting(marge)\nAnginous(marge)\nforall x (Inhuman(x) and Hegelian(x) -> Inland(x))\nforall x (Inhuman(x) -> Inland(x))\nHegelian(werner) and Inland(werner) -> Unexciting(werner)\n\nnot Inland(marge)\n\nforall x (Inhuman(x) and Hegelian(x) -> Inland(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2463"} {"premises": "Leonidas is coexisting. Leonidas is undercover. Leonidas is aftermost. Leonidas is billed. Leonidas is fusty. Nicol is undercover. Nicol is aftermost. White, fusty things are flexuous. White things are flexuous. If Leonidas is fusty and Leonidas is flexuous then Leonidas is undercover. Nicol is fusty.", "logic": "\nCoexisting(leonidas)\nUndercover(leonidas)\nAftermost(leonidas)\nBilled(leonidas)\nFusty(leonidas)\nUndercover(nicol)\nAftermost(nicol)\nforall x (Onymous(x) and Fusty(x) -> Flexuous(x))\nforall x (Onymous(x) -> Flexuous(x))\nFusty(leonidas) and Flexuous(leonidas) -> Undercover(leonidas)\n\nFusty(nicol)\n\nFusty(nicol) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2463"} {"premises": "The paule bequeath the mallory. The paule bequeath the guinevere. The paule is uncensored. The paule platinize the mallory. The paule register the mallory. The mallory is explosive. The mallory is additive. The mallory platinize the paule. The mallory register the paule. The mallory register the guinevere. The guinevere bequeath the paule. The guinevere is explosive. The guinevere is additive. The guinevere is uncensored. The guinevere platinize the paule. If someone register the mallory then they eat the paule. If someone is additive and they see the mallory then they eat the guinevere. If someone platinize the mallory and the mallory bequeath the paule then the mallory platinize the guinevere. If someone platinize the paule and the paule is additive then the paule register the guinevere. If someone bequeath the paule then they need the paule. If someone register the mallory and they need the paule then they see the guinevere. The mallory register the paule.", "logic": "\nBequeath(paule, mallory)\nBequeath(paule, guinevere)\nUncensored(paule)\nPlatinize(paule, mallory)\nRegister(paule, mallory)\nExplosive(mallory)\nAdditive(mallory)\nPlatinize(mallory, paule)\nRegister(mallory, paule)\nRegister(mallory, guinevere)\nBequeath(guinevere, paule)\nExplosive(guinevere)\nAdditive(guinevere)\nUncensored(guinevere)\nPlatinize(guinevere, paule)\nforall x (Register(x, mallory) -> Bequeath(x, paule))\nforall x (Additive(x) and Register(x, mallory) -> Bequeath(x, guinevere))\nforall x (Platinize(x, mallory) and Bequeath(mallory, paule) -> Platinize(mallory, guinevere))\nforall x (Platinize(x, paule) and Additive(paule) -> Register(paule, guinevere))\nforall x (Bequeath(x, paule) -> Platinize(x, paule))\nforall x (Register(x, mallory) and Platinize(x, paule) -> Register(x, guinevere))\n\nRegister(mallory, paule)\n\ntherefore Register(mallory, paule)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The karena declassify the barth. The karena declassify the urbain. The karena is regal. The karena understate the barth. The karena pluralize the barth. The barth is sorrel. The barth is color. The barth understate the karena. The barth pluralize the karena. The barth pluralize the urbain. The urbain declassify the karena. The urbain is sorrel. The urbain is color. The urbain is regal. The urbain understate the karena. If someone pluralize the barth then they eat the karena. If someone is color and they see the barth then they eat the urbain. If someone understate the barth and the barth declassify the karena then the barth understate the urbain. If someone understate the karena and the karena is color then the karena pluralize the urbain. If someone declassify the karena then they need the karena. If someone pluralize the barth and they need the karena then they see the urbain. The karena does not eat the urbain.", "logic": "\nDeclassify(karena, barth)\nDeclassify(karena, urbain)\nRegal(karena)\nUnderstate(karena, barth)\nPluralize(karena, barth)\nSorrel(barth)\nColor(barth)\nUnderstate(barth, karena)\nPluralize(barth, karena)\nPluralize(barth, urbain)\nDeclassify(urbain, karena)\nSorrel(urbain)\nColor(urbain)\nRegal(urbain)\nUnderstate(urbain, karena)\nforall x (Pluralize(x, barth) -> Declassify(x, karena))\nforall x (Color(x) and Pluralize(x, barth) -> Declassify(x, urbain))\nforall x (Understate(x, barth) and Declassify(barth, karena) -> Understate(barth, urbain))\nforall x (Understate(x, karena) and Color(karena) -> Pluralize(karena, urbain))\nforall x (Declassify(x, karena) -> Understate(x, karena))\nforall x (Pluralize(x, barth) and Understate(x, karena) -> Pluralize(x, urbain))\n\nnot Declassify(karena, urbain)\n\ntherefore Declassify(karena, urbain)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The grata champion the vasily. The grata champion the cordie. The grata is catechetic. The grata scourge the vasily. The grata chevy the vasily. The vasily is meaning. The vasily is clonic. The vasily scourge the grata. The vasily chevy the grata. The vasily chevy the cordie. The cordie champion the grata. The cordie is meaning. The cordie is clonic. The cordie is catechetic. The cordie scourge the grata. If someone chevy the vasily then they eat the grata. If someone is clonic and they see the vasily then they eat the cordie. If someone scourge the vasily and the vasily champion the grata then the vasily scourge the cordie. If someone scourge the grata and the grata is clonic then the grata chevy the cordie. If someone champion the grata then they need the grata. If someone chevy the vasily and they need the grata then they see the cordie. The grata champion the grata.", "logic": "\nChampion(grata, vasily)\nChampion(grata, cordie)\nCatechetic(grata)\nScourge(grata, vasily)\nChevy(grata, vasily)\nMeaning(vasily)\nClonic(vasily)\nScourge(vasily, grata)\nChevy(vasily, grata)\nChevy(vasily, cordie)\nChampion(cordie, grata)\nMeaning(cordie)\nClonic(cordie)\nCatechetic(cordie)\nScourge(cordie, grata)\nforall x (Chevy(x, vasily) -> Champion(x, grata))\nforall x (Clonic(x) and Chevy(x, vasily) -> Champion(x, cordie))\nforall x (Scourge(x, vasily) and Champion(vasily, grata) -> Scourge(vasily, cordie))\nforall x (Scourge(x, grata) and Clonic(grata) -> Chevy(grata, cordie))\nforall x (Champion(x, grata) -> Scourge(x, grata))\nforall x (Chevy(x, vasily) and Scourge(x, grata) -> Chevy(x, cordie))\n\nChampion(grata, grata)\n\nChevy(grata, vasily) and forall x (Chevy(x, vasily) -> Champion(x, grata)) -> therefore Champion(grata, grata)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The rebeka redeem the mair. The rebeka redeem the bjorn. The rebeka is electronic. The rebeka pardon the mair. The rebeka perfuse the mair. The mair is windburnt. The mair is nonviable. The mair pardon the rebeka. The mair perfuse the rebeka. The mair perfuse the bjorn. The bjorn redeem the rebeka. The bjorn is windburnt. The bjorn is nonviable. The bjorn is electronic. The bjorn pardon the rebeka. If someone perfuse the mair then they eat the rebeka. If someone is nonviable and they see the mair then they eat the bjorn. If someone pardon the mair and the mair redeem the rebeka then the mair pardon the bjorn. If someone pardon the rebeka and the rebeka is nonviable then the rebeka perfuse the bjorn. If someone redeem the rebeka then they need the rebeka. If someone perfuse the mair and they need the rebeka then they see the bjorn. The rebeka does not eat the rebeka.", "logic": "\nRedeem(rebeka, mair)\nRedeem(rebeka, bjorn)\nElectronic(rebeka)\nPardon(rebeka, mair)\nPerfuse(rebeka, mair)\nWindburnt(mair)\nNonviable(mair)\nPardon(mair, rebeka)\nPerfuse(mair, rebeka)\nPerfuse(mair, bjorn)\nRedeem(bjorn, rebeka)\nWindburnt(bjorn)\nNonviable(bjorn)\nElectronic(bjorn)\nPardon(bjorn, rebeka)\nforall x (Perfuse(x, mair) -> Redeem(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Nonviable(x) and Perfuse(x, mair) -> Redeem(x, bjorn))\nforall x (Pardon(x, mair) and Redeem(mair, rebeka) -> Pardon(mair, bjorn))\nforall x (Pardon(x, rebeka) and Nonviable(rebeka) -> Perfuse(rebeka, bjorn))\nforall x (Redeem(x, rebeka) -> Pardon(x, rebeka))\nforall x (Perfuse(x, mair) and Pardon(x, rebeka) -> Perfuse(x, bjorn))\n\nnot Redeem(rebeka, rebeka)\n\nPerfuse(rebeka, mair) and forall x (Perfuse(x, mair) -> Redeem(x, rebeka)) -> therefore Redeem(rebeka, rebeka)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The denice tiller the judye. The denice tiller the hezekiah. The denice is nonionised. The denice maculate the judye. The denice fruit the judye. The judye is unromantic. The judye is alchemic. The judye maculate the denice. The judye fruit the denice. The judye fruit the hezekiah. The hezekiah tiller the denice. The hezekiah is unromantic. The hezekiah is alchemic. The hezekiah is nonionised. The hezekiah maculate the denice. If someone fruit the judye then they eat the denice. If someone is alchemic and they see the judye then they eat the hezekiah. If someone maculate the judye and the judye tiller the denice then the judye maculate the hezekiah. If someone maculate the denice and the denice is alchemic then the denice fruit the hezekiah. If someone tiller the denice then they need the denice. If someone fruit the judye and they need the denice then they see the hezekiah. The denice maculate the denice.", "logic": "\nTiller(denice, judye)\nTiller(denice, hezekiah)\nNonionised(denice)\nMaculate(denice, judye)\nFruit(denice, judye)\nUnromantic(judye)\nAlchemic(judye)\nMaculate(judye, denice)\nFruit(judye, denice)\nFruit(judye, hezekiah)\nTiller(hezekiah, denice)\nUnromantic(hezekiah)\nAlchemic(hezekiah)\nNonionised(hezekiah)\nMaculate(hezekiah, denice)\nforall x (Fruit(x, judye) -> Tiller(x, denice))\nforall x (Alchemic(x) and Fruit(x, judye) -> Tiller(x, hezekiah))\nforall x (Maculate(x, judye) and Tiller(judye, denice) -> Maculate(judye, hezekiah))\nforall x (Maculate(x, denice) and Alchemic(denice) -> Fruit(denice, hezekiah))\nforall x (Tiller(x, denice) -> Maculate(x, denice))\nforall x (Fruit(x, judye) and Maculate(x, denice) -> Fruit(x, hezekiah))\n\nMaculate(denice, denice)\n\nFruit(denice, judye) and forall x (Fruit(x, judye) -> Tiller(x, denice)) -> therefore Tiller(denice, denice) Tiller(denice, denice) and forall x (Tiller(x, denice) -> Maculate(x, denice)) -> therefore Maculate(denice, denice)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The eleni obey the clari. The eleni obey the correy. The eleni is inadequate. The eleni butterfly the clari. The eleni nominate the clari. The clari is certified. The clari is shamed. The clari butterfly the eleni. The clari nominate the eleni. The clari nominate the correy. The correy obey the eleni. The correy is certified. The correy is shamed. The correy is inadequate. The correy butterfly the eleni. If someone nominate the clari then they eat the eleni. If someone is shamed and they see the clari then they eat the correy. If someone butterfly the clari and the clari obey the eleni then the clari butterfly the correy. If someone butterfly the eleni and the eleni is shamed then the eleni nominate the correy. If someone obey the eleni then they need the eleni. If someone nominate the clari and they need the eleni then they see the correy. The eleni does not need the eleni.", "logic": "\nObey(eleni, clari)\nObey(eleni, correy)\nInadequate(eleni)\nButterfly(eleni, clari)\nNominate(eleni, clari)\nCertified(clari)\nShamed(clari)\nButterfly(clari, eleni)\nNominate(clari, eleni)\nNominate(clari, correy)\nObey(correy, eleni)\nCertified(correy)\nShamed(correy)\nInadequate(correy)\nButterfly(correy, eleni)\nforall x (Nominate(x, clari) -> Obey(x, eleni))\nforall x (Shamed(x) and Nominate(x, clari) -> Obey(x, correy))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, clari) and Obey(clari, eleni) -> Butterfly(clari, correy))\nforall x (Butterfly(x, eleni) and Shamed(eleni) -> Nominate(eleni, correy))\nforall x (Obey(x, eleni) -> Butterfly(x, eleni))\nforall x (Nominate(x, clari) and Butterfly(x, eleni) -> Nominate(x, correy))\n\nnot Butterfly(eleni, eleni)\n\nNominate(eleni, clari) and forall x (Nominate(x, clari) -> Obey(x, eleni)) -> therefore Obey(eleni, eleni) Obey(eleni, eleni) and forall x (Obey(x, eleni) -> Butterfly(x, eleni)) -> therefore Butterfly(eleni, eleni)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The gonzales horse the ulrica. The gonzales horse the tanney. The gonzales is honied. The gonzales scupper the ulrica. The gonzales burke the ulrica. The ulrica is mutative. The ulrica is throbbing. The ulrica scupper the gonzales. The ulrica burke the gonzales. The ulrica burke the tanney. The tanney horse the gonzales. The tanney is mutative. The tanney is throbbing. The tanney is honied. The tanney scupper the gonzales. If someone burke the ulrica then they eat the gonzales. If someone is throbbing and they see the ulrica then they eat the tanney. If someone scupper the ulrica and the ulrica horse the gonzales then the ulrica scupper the tanney. If someone scupper the gonzales and the gonzales is throbbing then the gonzales burke the tanney. If someone horse the gonzales then they need the gonzales. If someone burke the ulrica and they need the gonzales then they see the tanney. The gonzales burke the tanney.", "logic": "\nHorse(gonzales, ulrica)\nHorse(gonzales, tanney)\nHonied(gonzales)\nScupper(gonzales, ulrica)\nBurke(gonzales, ulrica)\nMutative(ulrica)\nThrobbing(ulrica)\nScupper(ulrica, gonzales)\nBurke(ulrica, gonzales)\nBurke(ulrica, tanney)\nHorse(tanney, gonzales)\nMutative(tanney)\nThrobbing(tanney)\nHonied(tanney)\nScupper(tanney, gonzales)\nforall x (Burke(x, ulrica) -> Horse(x, gonzales))\nforall x (Throbbing(x) and Burke(x, ulrica) -> Horse(x, tanney))\nforall x (Scupper(x, ulrica) and Horse(ulrica, gonzales) -> Scupper(ulrica, tanney))\nforall x (Scupper(x, gonzales) and Throbbing(gonzales) -> Burke(gonzales, tanney))\nforall x (Horse(x, gonzales) -> Scupper(x, gonzales))\nforall x (Burke(x, ulrica) and Scupper(x, gonzales) -> Burke(x, tanney))\n\nBurke(gonzales, tanney)\n\nBurke(gonzales, ulrica) and forall x (Burke(x, ulrica) -> Horse(x, gonzales)) -> therefore Horse(gonzales, gonzales) Horse(gonzales, gonzales) and forall x (Horse(x, gonzales) -> Scupper(x, gonzales)) -> therefore Scupper(gonzales, gonzales) Burke(gonzales, ulrica) and Scupper(gonzales, gonzales) and forall x (Burke(x, ulrica) and Scupper(x, gonzales) -> Burke(x, tanney)) -> therefore Burke(gonzales, tanney)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The lily compound the case. The lily compound the aurelea. The lily is ghanaian. The lily conjugate the case. The lily scuttle the case. The case is roiling. The case is nourished. The case conjugate the lily. The case scuttle the lily. The case scuttle the aurelea. The aurelea compound the lily. The aurelea is roiling. The aurelea is nourished. The aurelea is ghanaian. The aurelea conjugate the lily. If someone scuttle the case then they eat the lily. If someone is nourished and they see the case then they eat the aurelea. If someone conjugate the case and the case compound the lily then the case conjugate the aurelea. If someone conjugate the lily and the lily is nourished then the lily scuttle the aurelea. If someone compound the lily then they need the lily. If someone scuttle the case and they need the lily then they see the aurelea. The lily does not see the aurelea.", "logic": "\nCompound(lily, case)\nCompound(lily, aurelea)\nGhanaian(lily)\nConjugate(lily, case)\nScuttle(lily, case)\nRoiling(case)\nNourished(case)\nConjugate(case, lily)\nScuttle(case, lily)\nScuttle(case, aurelea)\nCompound(aurelea, lily)\nRoiling(aurelea)\nNourished(aurelea)\nGhanaian(aurelea)\nConjugate(aurelea, lily)\nforall x (Scuttle(x, case) -> Compound(x, lily))\nforall x (Nourished(x) and Scuttle(x, case) -> Compound(x, aurelea))\nforall x (Conjugate(x, case) and Compound(case, lily) -> Conjugate(case, aurelea))\nforall x (Conjugate(x, lily) and Nourished(lily) -> Scuttle(lily, aurelea))\nforall x (Compound(x, lily) -> Conjugate(x, lily))\nforall x (Scuttle(x, case) and Conjugate(x, lily) -> Scuttle(x, aurelea))\n\nnot Scuttle(lily, aurelea)\n\nScuttle(lily, case) and forall x (Scuttle(x, case) -> Compound(x, lily)) -> therefore Compound(lily, lily) Compound(lily, lily) and forall x (Compound(x, lily) -> Conjugate(x, lily)) -> therefore Conjugate(lily, lily) Scuttle(lily, case) and Conjugate(lily, lily) and forall x (Scuttle(x, case) and Conjugate(x, lily) -> Scuttle(x, aurelea)) -> therefore Scuttle(lily, aurelea)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The dari castrate the johnna. The dari castrate the kalina. The dari is runproof. The dari route the johnna. The dari scramble the johnna. The johnna is unblended. The johnna is unsilenced. The johnna route the dari. The johnna scramble the dari. The johnna scramble the kalina. The kalina castrate the dari. The kalina is unblended. The kalina is unsilenced. The kalina is runproof. The kalina route the dari. If someone scramble the johnna then they eat the dari. If someone is unsilenced and they see the johnna then they eat the kalina. If someone route the johnna and the johnna castrate the dari then the johnna route the kalina. If someone route the dari and the dari is unsilenced then the dari scramble the kalina. If someone castrate the dari then they need the dari. If someone scramble the johnna and they need the dari then they see the kalina. The johnna does not eat the kalina.", "logic": "\nCastrate(dari, johnna)\nCastrate(dari, kalina)\nRunproof(dari)\nRoute(dari, johnna)\nScramble(dari, johnna)\nUnblended(johnna)\nUnsilenced(johnna)\nRoute(johnna, dari)\nScramble(johnna, dari)\nScramble(johnna, kalina)\nCastrate(kalina, dari)\nUnblended(kalina)\nUnsilenced(kalina)\nRunproof(kalina)\nRoute(kalina, dari)\nforall x (Scramble(x, johnna) -> Castrate(x, dari))\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) and Scramble(x, johnna) -> Castrate(x, kalina))\nforall x (Route(x, johnna) and Castrate(johnna, dari) -> Route(johnna, kalina))\nforall x (Route(x, dari) and Unsilenced(dari) -> Scramble(dari, kalina))\nforall x (Castrate(x, dari) -> Route(x, dari))\nforall x (Scramble(x, johnna) and Route(x, dari) -> Scramble(x, kalina))\n\nnot Castrate(johnna, kalina)\n\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) and Scramble(x, johnna) -> Castrate(x, kalina)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The sasha deflect the ricard. The sasha deflect the silvan. The sasha is astir. The sasha frenchify the ricard. The sasha benday the ricard. The ricard is compound. The ricard is apostate. The ricard frenchify the sasha. The ricard benday the sasha. The ricard benday the silvan. The silvan deflect the sasha. The silvan is compound. The silvan is apostate. The silvan is astir. The silvan frenchify the sasha. If someone benday the ricard then they eat the sasha. If someone is apostate and they see the ricard then they eat the silvan. If someone frenchify the ricard and the ricard deflect the sasha then the ricard frenchify the silvan. If someone frenchify the sasha and the sasha is apostate then the sasha benday the silvan. If someone deflect the sasha then they need the sasha. If someone benday the ricard and they need the sasha then they see the silvan. The silvan benday the silvan.", "logic": "\nDeflect(sasha, ricard)\nDeflect(sasha, silvan)\nAstir(sasha)\nFrenchify(sasha, ricard)\nBenday(sasha, ricard)\nCompound(ricard)\nApostate(ricard)\nFrenchify(ricard, sasha)\nBenday(ricard, sasha)\nBenday(ricard, silvan)\nDeflect(silvan, sasha)\nCompound(silvan)\nApostate(silvan)\nAstir(silvan)\nFrenchify(silvan, sasha)\nforall x (Benday(x, ricard) -> Deflect(x, sasha))\nforall x (Apostate(x) and Benday(x, ricard) -> Deflect(x, silvan))\nforall x (Frenchify(x, ricard) and Deflect(ricard, sasha) -> Frenchify(ricard, silvan))\nforall x (Frenchify(x, sasha) and Apostate(sasha) -> Benday(sasha, silvan))\nforall x (Deflect(x, sasha) -> Frenchify(x, sasha))\nforall x (Benday(x, ricard) and Frenchify(x, sasha) -> Benday(x, silvan))\n\nBenday(silvan, silvan)\n\nforall x (Benday(x, ricard) and Frenchify(x, sasha) -> Benday(x, silvan)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The lyn headbutt the judi. The lyn headbutt the udale. The lyn is ferrous. The lyn engender the judi. The lyn understate the judi. The judi is deft. The judi is egocentric. The judi engender the lyn. The judi understate the lyn. The judi understate the udale. The udale headbutt the lyn. The udale is deft. The udale is egocentric. The udale is ferrous. The udale engender the lyn. If someone understate the judi then they eat the lyn. If someone is egocentric and they see the judi then they eat the udale. If someone engender the judi and the judi headbutt the lyn then the judi engender the udale. If someone engender the lyn and the lyn is egocentric then the lyn understate the udale. If someone headbutt the lyn then they need the lyn. If someone understate the judi and they need the lyn then they see the udale. The udale does not eat the udale.", "logic": "\nHeadbutt(lyn, judi)\nHeadbutt(lyn, udale)\nFerrous(lyn)\nEngender(lyn, judi)\nUnderstate(lyn, judi)\nDeft(judi)\nEgocentric(judi)\nEngender(judi, lyn)\nUnderstate(judi, lyn)\nUnderstate(judi, udale)\nHeadbutt(udale, lyn)\nDeft(udale)\nEgocentric(udale)\nFerrous(udale)\nEngender(udale, lyn)\nforall x (Understate(x, judi) -> Headbutt(x, lyn))\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and Understate(x, judi) -> Headbutt(x, udale))\nforall x (Engender(x, judi) and Headbutt(judi, lyn) -> Engender(judi, udale))\nforall x (Engender(x, lyn) and Egocentric(lyn) -> Understate(lyn, udale))\nforall x (Headbutt(x, lyn) -> Engender(x, lyn))\nforall x (Understate(x, judi) and Engender(x, lyn) -> Understate(x, udale))\n\nnot Headbutt(udale, udale)\n\nforall x (Egocentric(x) and Understate(x, judi) -> Headbutt(x, udale)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The kitty deactivate the humbert. The kitty deactivate the dulciana. The kitty is rhymed. The kitty convey the humbert. The kitty drum the humbert. The humbert is dedicated. The humbert is snuffly. The humbert convey the kitty. The humbert drum the kitty. The humbert drum the dulciana. The dulciana deactivate the kitty. The dulciana is dedicated. The dulciana is snuffly. The dulciana is rhymed. The dulciana convey the kitty. If someone drum the humbert then they eat the kitty. If someone is snuffly and they see the humbert then they eat the dulciana. If someone convey the humbert and the humbert deactivate the kitty then the humbert convey the dulciana. If someone convey the kitty and the kitty is snuffly then the kitty drum the dulciana. If someone deactivate the kitty then they need the kitty. If someone drum the humbert and they need the kitty then they see the dulciana. The humbert convey the dulciana.", "logic": "\nDeactivate(kitty, humbert)\nDeactivate(kitty, dulciana)\nRhymed(kitty)\nConvey(kitty, humbert)\nDrum(kitty, humbert)\nDedicated(humbert)\nSnuffly(humbert)\nConvey(humbert, kitty)\nDrum(humbert, kitty)\nDrum(humbert, dulciana)\nDeactivate(dulciana, kitty)\nDedicated(dulciana)\nSnuffly(dulciana)\nRhymed(dulciana)\nConvey(dulciana, kitty)\nforall x (Drum(x, humbert) -> Deactivate(x, kitty))\nforall x (Snuffly(x) and Drum(x, humbert) -> Deactivate(x, dulciana))\nforall x (Convey(x, humbert) and Deactivate(humbert, kitty) -> Convey(humbert, dulciana))\nforall x (Convey(x, kitty) and Snuffly(kitty) -> Drum(kitty, dulciana))\nforall x (Deactivate(x, kitty) -> Convey(x, kitty))\nforall x (Drum(x, humbert) and Convey(x, kitty) -> Drum(x, dulciana))\n\nConvey(humbert, dulciana)\n\nforall x (Convey(x, humbert) and Deactivate(humbert, kitty) -> Convey(humbert, dulciana)) <- forall x (Drum(x, humbert) -> Deactivate(x, kitty)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The henrieta gorge the georgie. The henrieta gorge the son. The henrieta is oval. The henrieta fulfill the georgie. The henrieta bleat the georgie. The georgie is hastate. The georgie is enforced. The georgie fulfill the henrieta. The georgie bleat the henrieta. The georgie bleat the son. The son gorge the henrieta. The son is hastate. The son is enforced. The son is oval. The son fulfill the henrieta. If someone bleat the georgie then they eat the henrieta. If someone is enforced and they see the georgie then they eat the son. If someone fulfill the georgie and the georgie gorge the henrieta then the georgie fulfill the son. If someone fulfill the henrieta and the henrieta is enforced then the henrieta bleat the son. If someone gorge the henrieta then they need the henrieta. If someone bleat the georgie and they need the henrieta then they see the son. The georgie is not green.", "logic": "\nGorge(henrieta, georgie)\nGorge(henrieta, son)\nOval(henrieta)\nFulfill(henrieta, georgie)\nBleat(henrieta, georgie)\nHastate(georgie)\nEnforced(georgie)\nFulfill(georgie, henrieta)\nBleat(georgie, henrieta)\nBleat(georgie, son)\nGorge(son, henrieta)\nHastate(son)\nEnforced(son)\nOval(son)\nFulfill(son, henrieta)\nforall x (Bleat(x, georgie) -> Gorge(x, henrieta))\nforall x (Enforced(x) and Bleat(x, georgie) -> Gorge(x, son))\nforall x (Fulfill(x, georgie) and Gorge(georgie, henrieta) -> Fulfill(georgie, son))\nforall x (Fulfill(x, henrieta) and Enforced(henrieta) -> Bleat(henrieta, son))\nforall x (Gorge(x, henrieta) -> Fulfill(x, henrieta))\nforall x (Bleat(x, georgie) and Fulfill(x, henrieta) -> Bleat(x, son))\n\nnot Green(georgie)\n\nnot Green(georgie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The carsten islamise the murdock. The carsten islamise the thomasina. The carsten is opulent. The carsten trademark the murdock. The carsten gluttonize the murdock. The murdock is governable. The murdock is darkening. The murdock trademark the carsten. The murdock gluttonize the carsten. The murdock gluttonize the thomasina. The thomasina islamise the carsten. The thomasina is governable. The thomasina is darkening. The thomasina is opulent. The thomasina trademark the carsten. If someone gluttonize the murdock then they eat the carsten. If someone is darkening and they see the murdock then they eat the thomasina. If someone trademark the murdock and the murdock islamise the carsten then the murdock trademark the thomasina. If someone trademark the carsten and the carsten is darkening then the carsten gluttonize the thomasina. If someone islamise the carsten then they need the carsten. If someone gluttonize the murdock and they need the carsten then they see the thomasina. The carsten trademark the thomasina.", "logic": "\nIslamise(carsten, murdock)\nIslamise(carsten, thomasina)\nOpulent(carsten)\nTrademark(carsten, murdock)\nGluttonize(carsten, murdock)\nGovernable(murdock)\nDarkening(murdock)\nTrademark(murdock, carsten)\nGluttonize(murdock, carsten)\nGluttonize(murdock, thomasina)\nIslamise(thomasina, carsten)\nGovernable(thomasina)\nDarkening(thomasina)\nOpulent(thomasina)\nTrademark(thomasina, carsten)\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, murdock) -> Islamise(x, carsten))\nforall x (Darkening(x) and Gluttonize(x, murdock) -> Islamise(x, thomasina))\nforall x (Trademark(x, murdock) and Islamise(murdock, carsten) -> Trademark(murdock, thomasina))\nforall x (Trademark(x, carsten) and Darkening(carsten) -> Gluttonize(carsten, thomasina))\nforall x (Islamise(x, carsten) -> Trademark(x, carsten))\nforall x (Gluttonize(x, murdock) and Trademark(x, carsten) -> Gluttonize(x, thomasina))\n\nTrademark(carsten, thomasina)\n\nTrademark(carsten, thomasina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The rocky overact the nita. The rocky overact the teryl. The rocky is addled. The rocky ingest the nita. The rocky railroad the nita. The nita is geodesical. The nita is unblushing. The nita ingest the rocky. The nita railroad the rocky. The nita railroad the teryl. The teryl overact the rocky. The teryl is geodesical. The teryl is unblushing. The teryl is addled. The teryl ingest the rocky. If someone railroad the nita then they eat the rocky. If someone is unblushing and they see the nita then they eat the teryl. If someone ingest the nita and the nita overact the rocky then the nita ingest the teryl. If someone ingest the rocky and the rocky is unblushing then the rocky railroad the teryl. If someone overact the rocky then they need the rocky. If someone railroad the nita and they need the rocky then they see the teryl. The rocky is not unblushing.", "logic": "\nOveract(rocky, nita)\nOveract(rocky, teryl)\nAddled(rocky)\nIngest(rocky, nita)\nRailroad(rocky, nita)\nGeodesical(nita)\nUnblushing(nita)\nIngest(nita, rocky)\nRailroad(nita, rocky)\nRailroad(nita, teryl)\nOveract(teryl, rocky)\nGeodesical(teryl)\nUnblushing(teryl)\nAddled(teryl)\nIngest(teryl, rocky)\nforall x (Railroad(x, nita) -> Overact(x, rocky))\nforall x (Unblushing(x) and Railroad(x, nita) -> Overact(x, teryl))\nforall x (Ingest(x, nita) and Overact(nita, rocky) -> Ingest(nita, teryl))\nforall x (Ingest(x, rocky) and Unblushing(rocky) -> Railroad(rocky, teryl))\nforall x (Overact(x, rocky) -> Ingest(x, rocky))\nforall x (Railroad(x, nita) and Ingest(x, rocky) -> Railroad(x, teryl))\n\nnot Unblushing(rocky)\n\nnot Unblushing(rocky) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "The dasha gear the thad. The dasha gear the vivian. The dasha is wrapped. The dasha credit the thad. The dasha divorce the thad. The thad is rectified. The thad is grammatic. The thad credit the dasha. The thad divorce the dasha. The thad divorce the vivian. The vivian gear the dasha. The vivian is rectified. The vivian is grammatic. The vivian is wrapped. The vivian credit the dasha. If someone divorce the thad then they eat the dasha. If someone is grammatic and they see the thad then they eat the vivian. If someone credit the thad and the thad gear the dasha then the thad credit the vivian. If someone credit the dasha and the dasha is grammatic then the dasha divorce the vivian. If someone gear the dasha then they need the dasha. If someone divorce the thad and they need the dasha then they see the vivian. The thad gear the thad.", "logic": "\nGear(dasha, thad)\nGear(dasha, vivian)\nWrapped(dasha)\nCredit(dasha, thad)\nDivorce(dasha, thad)\nRectified(thad)\nGrammatic(thad)\nCredit(thad, dasha)\nDivorce(thad, dasha)\nDivorce(thad, vivian)\nGear(vivian, dasha)\nRectified(vivian)\nGrammatic(vivian)\nWrapped(vivian)\nCredit(vivian, dasha)\nforall x (Divorce(x, thad) -> Gear(x, dasha))\nforall x (Grammatic(x) and Divorce(x, thad) -> Gear(x, vivian))\nforall x (Credit(x, thad) and Gear(thad, dasha) -> Credit(thad, vivian))\nforall x (Credit(x, dasha) and Grammatic(dasha) -> Divorce(dasha, vivian))\nforall x (Gear(x, dasha) -> Credit(x, dasha))\nforall x (Divorce(x, thad) and Credit(x, dasha) -> Divorce(x, vivian))\n\nGear(thad, thad)\n\nGear(thad, thad) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1264"} {"premises": "Rissa is reflecting. Rissa is iniquitous. Rissa is mongoloid. If something is reflecting and antenatal then it is not unendowed. If something is iniquitous and not reflecting then it is unendowed. If Rissa is iniquitous then Rissa is crackers. Rissa is iniquitous.", "logic": "\nReflecting(rissa)\nIniquitous(rissa)\nMongoloid(rissa)\nforall x (Reflecting(x) and Antenatal(x) -> not Unendowed(x))\nforall x (Iniquitous(x) and not Reflecting(x) -> Unendowed(x))\nIniquitous(rissa) -> Crackers(rissa)\n\nIniquitous(rissa)\n\ntherefore Iniquitous(rissa)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3997"} {"premises": "Gloriane is lowland. Gloriane is trilobate. Gloriane is fissile. If something is lowland and unpillared then it is not uruguayan. If something is trilobate and not lowland then it is uruguayan. If Gloriane is trilobate then Gloriane is bastardly. Gloriane is not lowland.", "logic": "\nLowland(gloriane)\nTrilobate(gloriane)\nFissile(gloriane)\nforall x (Lowland(x) and Unpillared(x) -> not Uruguayan(x))\nforall x (Trilobate(x) and not Lowland(x) -> Uruguayan(x))\nTrilobate(gloriane) -> Bastardly(gloriane)\n\nnot Lowland(gloriane)\n\ntherefore Lowland(gloriane)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3997"} {"premises": "Caritta is stertorous. Caritta is clement. Caritta is arboresque. If something is stertorous and wolflike then it is not forbidding. If something is clement and not stertorous then it is forbidding. If Caritta is clement then Caritta is sparing. Caritta is not forbidding.", "logic": "\nStertorous(caritta)\nClement(caritta)\nArboresque(caritta)\nforall x (Stertorous(x) and Wolflike(x) -> not Forbidding(x))\nforall x (Clement(x) and not Stertorous(x) -> Forbidding(x))\nClement(caritta) -> Sparing(caritta)\n\nnot Forbidding(caritta)\n\nforall x (Clement(x) and not Stertorous(x) -> Forbidding(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3997"} {"premises": "Collin is shakedown. Collin is indian. Collin is buttery. If something is shakedown and avestan then it is not yeatsian. If something is indian and not shakedown then it is yeatsian. If Collin is indian then Collin is strict. Collin is avestan.", "logic": "\nShakedown(collin)\nIndian(collin)\nButtery(collin)\nforall x (Shakedown(x) and Avestan(x) -> not Yeatsian(x))\nforall x (Indian(x) and not Shakedown(x) -> Yeatsian(x))\nIndian(collin) -> Strict(collin)\n\nAvestan(collin)\n\nAvestan(collin) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-3997"} {"premises": "Daune is sequined. Daune is bankrupt. Daune is inflowing. Daune is epitheliod. Daune is not pernickety. Hollie is sequined. Hollie is pernickety. Hollie is poisonous. Hollie is powerful. Muriel is epitheliod. Muriel is powerful. Rodolphe is bankrupt. Rodolphe is inflowing. Rodolphe is epitheliod. Rodolphe is pernickety. If Rodolphe is epitheliod then Rodolphe is inflowing. If something is powerful then it is inflowing. All inflowing things are poisonous. If something is powerful and inflowing then it is bankrupt. If Muriel is poisonous then Muriel is sequined. If something is powerful then it is epitheliod. Daune is not pernickety.", "logic": "\nSequined(daune)\nBankrupt(daune)\nInflowing(daune)\nEpitheliod(daune)\nnot Pernickety(daune)\nSequined(hollie)\nPernickety(hollie)\nPoisonous(hollie)\nPowerful(hollie)\nEpitheliod(muriel)\nPowerful(muriel)\nBankrupt(rodolphe)\nInflowing(rodolphe)\nEpitheliod(rodolphe)\nPernickety(rodolphe)\nEpitheliod(rodolphe) -> Inflowing(rodolphe)\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> Inflowing(x))\nforall x (Inflowing(x) -> Poisonous(x))\nforall x (Powerful(x) and Inflowing(x) -> Bankrupt(x))\nPoisonous(muriel) -> Sequined(muriel)\nforall x (Powerful(x) -> Epitheliod(x))\n\nnot Pernickety(daune)\n\ntherefore not Pernickety(daune)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Blythe is continent. Blythe is unheeding. Blythe is classy. Blythe is callous. Blythe is not cracking. Nolana is continent. Nolana is cracking. Nolana is reversive. Nolana is pied. Heloise is callous. Heloise is pied. Sioux is unheeding. Sioux is classy. Sioux is callous. Sioux is cracking. If Sioux is callous then Sioux is classy. If something is pied then it is classy. All classy things are reversive. If something is pied and classy then it is unheeding. If Heloise is reversive then Heloise is continent. If something is pied then it is callous. Sioux is not callous.", "logic": "\nContinent(blythe)\nUnheeding(blythe)\nClassy(blythe)\nCallous(blythe)\nnot Cracking(blythe)\nContinent(nolana)\nCracking(nolana)\nReversive(nolana)\nPied(nolana)\nCallous(heloise)\nPied(heloise)\nUnheeding(sioux)\nClassy(sioux)\nCallous(sioux)\nCracking(sioux)\nCallous(sioux) -> Classy(sioux)\nforall x (Pied(x) -> Classy(x))\nforall x (Classy(x) -> Reversive(x))\nforall x (Pied(x) and Classy(x) -> Unheeding(x))\nReversive(heloise) -> Continent(heloise)\nforall x (Pied(x) -> Callous(x))\n\nnot Callous(sioux)\n\ntherefore Callous(sioux)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Sansone is sapphire. Sansone is ergodic. Sansone is unavowed. Sansone is carven. Sansone is not incorrupt. Jillane is sapphire. Jillane is incorrupt. Jillane is salaried. Jillane is spiritless. Tiffanie is carven. Tiffanie is spiritless. Cally is ergodic. Cally is unavowed. Cally is carven. Cally is incorrupt. If Cally is carven then Cally is unavowed. If something is spiritless then it is unavowed. All unavowed things are salaried. If something is spiritless and unavowed then it is ergodic. If Tiffanie is salaried then Tiffanie is sapphire. If something is spiritless then it is carven. Tiffanie is unavowed.", "logic": "\nSapphire(sansone)\nErgodic(sansone)\nUnavowed(sansone)\nCarven(sansone)\nnot Incorrupt(sansone)\nSapphire(jillane)\nIncorrupt(jillane)\nSalaried(jillane)\nSpiritless(jillane)\nCarven(tiffanie)\nSpiritless(tiffanie)\nErgodic(cally)\nUnavowed(cally)\nCarven(cally)\nIncorrupt(cally)\nCarven(cally) -> Unavowed(cally)\nforall x (Spiritless(x) -> Unavowed(x))\nforall x (Unavowed(x) -> Salaried(x))\nforall x (Spiritless(x) and Unavowed(x) -> Ergodic(x))\nSalaried(tiffanie) -> Sapphire(tiffanie)\nforall x (Spiritless(x) -> Carven(x))\n\nUnavowed(tiffanie)\n\nSpiritless(tiffanie) and forall x (Spiritless(x) -> Unavowed(x)) -> therefore Unavowed(tiffanie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Lyndell is deific. Lyndell is unpaid. Lyndell is pubic. Lyndell is skimmed. Lyndell is not particular. Ambrosius is deific. Ambrosius is particular. Ambrosius is ducal. Ambrosius is erogenous. Wallie is skimmed. Wallie is erogenous. Amandie is unpaid. Amandie is pubic. Amandie is skimmed. Amandie is particular. If Amandie is skimmed then Amandie is pubic. If something is erogenous then it is pubic. All pubic things are ducal. If something is erogenous and pubic then it is unpaid. If Wallie is ducal then Wallie is deific. If something is erogenous then it is skimmed. Ambrosius is not skimmed.", "logic": "\nDeific(lyndell)\nUnpaid(lyndell)\nPubic(lyndell)\nSkimmed(lyndell)\nnot Particular(lyndell)\nDeific(ambrosius)\nParticular(ambrosius)\nDucal(ambrosius)\nErogenous(ambrosius)\nSkimmed(wallie)\nErogenous(wallie)\nUnpaid(amandie)\nPubic(amandie)\nSkimmed(amandie)\nParticular(amandie)\nSkimmed(amandie) -> Pubic(amandie)\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Pubic(x))\nforall x (Pubic(x) -> Ducal(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) and Pubic(x) -> Unpaid(x))\nDucal(wallie) -> Deific(wallie)\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Skimmed(x))\n\nnot Skimmed(ambrosius)\n\nErogenous(ambrosius) and forall x (Erogenous(x) -> Skimmed(x)) -> therefore Skimmed(ambrosius)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Emalee is sinhala. Emalee is allogeneic. Emalee is unvaried. Emalee is primal. Emalee is not goethean. Nike is sinhala. Nike is goethean. Nike is belittled. Nike is copious. Keren is primal. Keren is copious. Xylia is allogeneic. Xylia is unvaried. Xylia is primal. Xylia is goethean. If Xylia is primal then Xylia is unvaried. If something is copious then it is unvaried. All unvaried things are belittled. If something is copious and unvaried then it is allogeneic. If Keren is belittled then Keren is sinhala. If something is copious then it is primal. Keren is belittled.", "logic": "\nSinhala(emalee)\nAllogeneic(emalee)\nUnvaried(emalee)\nPrimal(emalee)\nnot Goethean(emalee)\nSinhala(nike)\nGoethean(nike)\nBelittled(nike)\nCopious(nike)\nPrimal(keren)\nCopious(keren)\nAllogeneic(xylia)\nUnvaried(xylia)\nPrimal(xylia)\nGoethean(xylia)\nPrimal(xylia) -> Unvaried(xylia)\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Unvaried(x))\nforall x (Unvaried(x) -> Belittled(x))\nforall x (Copious(x) and Unvaried(x) -> Allogeneic(x))\nBelittled(keren) -> Sinhala(keren)\nforall x (Copious(x) -> Primal(x))\n\nBelittled(keren)\n\nCopious(keren) and forall x (Copious(x) -> Unvaried(x)) -> therefore Unvaried(keren) Unvaried(keren) and forall x (Unvaried(x) -> Belittled(x)) -> therefore Belittled(keren)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Rahal is still. Rahal is average. Rahal is rare. Rahal is unorthodox. Rahal is not redeeming. Elizabeth is still. Elizabeth is redeeming. Elizabeth is frantic. Elizabeth is energising. Jenny is unorthodox. Jenny is energising. Friedrich is average. Friedrich is rare. Friedrich is unorthodox. Friedrich is redeeming. If Friedrich is unorthodox then Friedrich is rare. If something is energising then it is rare. All rare things are frantic. If something is energising and rare then it is average. If Jenny is frantic then Jenny is still. If something is energising then it is unorthodox. Jenny is not frantic.", "logic": "\nStill(rahal)\nAverage(rahal)\nRare(rahal)\nUnorthodox(rahal)\nnot Redeeming(rahal)\nStill(elizabeth)\nRedeeming(elizabeth)\nFrantic(elizabeth)\nEnergising(elizabeth)\nUnorthodox(jenny)\nEnergising(jenny)\nAverage(friedrich)\nRare(friedrich)\nUnorthodox(friedrich)\nRedeeming(friedrich)\nUnorthodox(friedrich) -> Rare(friedrich)\nforall x (Energising(x) -> Rare(x))\nforall x (Rare(x) -> Frantic(x))\nforall x (Energising(x) and Rare(x) -> Average(x))\nFrantic(jenny) -> Still(jenny)\nforall x (Energising(x) -> Unorthodox(x))\n\nnot Frantic(jenny)\n\nEnergising(jenny) and forall x (Energising(x) -> Rare(x)) -> therefore Rare(jenny) Rare(jenny) and forall x (Rare(x) -> Frantic(x)) -> therefore Frantic(jenny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Sharyl is assured. Sharyl is dental. Sharyl is unexpected. Sharyl is schmalzy. Sharyl is not analogue. Nanette is assured. Nanette is analogue. Nanette is runny. Nanette is mouselike. Augustina is schmalzy. Augustina is mouselike. Rickie is dental. Rickie is unexpected. Rickie is schmalzy. Rickie is analogue. If Rickie is schmalzy then Rickie is unexpected. If something is mouselike then it is unexpected. All unexpected things are runny. If something is mouselike and unexpected then it is dental. If Augustina is runny then Augustina is assured. If something is mouselike then it is schmalzy. Augustina is assured.", "logic": "\nAssured(sharyl)\nDental(sharyl)\nUnexpected(sharyl)\nSchmalzy(sharyl)\nnot Analogue(sharyl)\nAssured(nanette)\nAnalogue(nanette)\nRunny(nanette)\nMouselike(nanette)\nSchmalzy(augustina)\nMouselike(augustina)\nDental(rickie)\nUnexpected(rickie)\nSchmalzy(rickie)\nAnalogue(rickie)\nSchmalzy(rickie) -> Unexpected(rickie)\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Unexpected(x))\nforall x (Unexpected(x) -> Runny(x))\nforall x (Mouselike(x) and Unexpected(x) -> Dental(x))\nRunny(augustina) -> Assured(augustina)\nforall x (Mouselike(x) -> Schmalzy(x))\n\nAssured(augustina)\n\nMouselike(augustina) and forall x (Mouselike(x) -> Unexpected(x)) -> therefore Unexpected(augustina) Unexpected(augustina) and forall x (Unexpected(x) -> Runny(x)) -> therefore Runny(augustina) Runny(augustina) and Runny(augustina) -> Assured(augustina) -> therefore Assured(augustina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Janessa is reducible. Janessa is unimpeded. Janessa is bedded. Janessa is fluent. Janessa is not pitiful. Dryke is reducible. Dryke is pitiful. Dryke is lxxxiii. Dryke is puff. Johnathan is fluent. Johnathan is puff. Thatcher is unimpeded. Thatcher is bedded. Thatcher is fluent. Thatcher is pitiful. If Thatcher is fluent then Thatcher is bedded. If something is puff then it is bedded. All bedded things are lxxxiii. If something is puff and bedded then it is unimpeded. If Johnathan is lxxxiii then Johnathan is reducible. If something is puff then it is fluent. Johnathan is not reducible.", "logic": "\nReducible(janessa)\nUnimpeded(janessa)\nBedded(janessa)\nFluent(janessa)\nnot Pitiful(janessa)\nReducible(dryke)\nPitiful(dryke)\nLxxxiii(dryke)\nPuff(dryke)\nFluent(johnathan)\nPuff(johnathan)\nUnimpeded(thatcher)\nBedded(thatcher)\nFluent(thatcher)\nPitiful(thatcher)\nFluent(thatcher) -> Bedded(thatcher)\nforall x (Puff(x) -> Bedded(x))\nforall x (Bedded(x) -> Lxxxiii(x))\nforall x (Puff(x) and Bedded(x) -> Unimpeded(x))\nLxxxiii(johnathan) -> Reducible(johnathan)\nforall x (Puff(x) -> Fluent(x))\n\nnot Reducible(johnathan)\n\nPuff(johnathan) and forall x (Puff(x) -> Bedded(x)) -> therefore Bedded(johnathan) Bedded(johnathan) and forall x (Bedded(x) -> Lxxxiii(x)) -> therefore Lxxxiii(johnathan) Lxxxiii(johnathan) and Lxxxiii(johnathan) -> Reducible(johnathan) -> therefore Reducible(johnathan)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Nolan is shut. Nolan is exploited. Nolan is refreshed. Nolan is secretive. Nolan is not hagridden. Xylina is shut. Xylina is hagridden. Xylina is amblyopic. Xylina is restive. Xavier is secretive. Xavier is restive. Frederic is exploited. Frederic is refreshed. Frederic is secretive. Frederic is hagridden. If Frederic is secretive then Frederic is refreshed. If something is restive then it is refreshed. All refreshed things are amblyopic. If something is restive and refreshed then it is exploited. If Xavier is amblyopic then Xavier is shut. If something is restive then it is secretive. Frederic is not restive.", "logic": "\nShut(nolan)\nExploited(nolan)\nRefreshed(nolan)\nSecretive(nolan)\nnot Hagridden(nolan)\nShut(xylina)\nHagridden(xylina)\nAmblyopic(xylina)\nRestive(xylina)\nSecretive(xavier)\nRestive(xavier)\nExploited(frederic)\nRefreshed(frederic)\nSecretive(frederic)\nHagridden(frederic)\nSecretive(frederic) -> Refreshed(frederic)\nforall x (Restive(x) -> Refreshed(x))\nforall x (Refreshed(x) -> Amblyopic(x))\nforall x (Restive(x) and Refreshed(x) -> Exploited(x))\nAmblyopic(xavier) -> Shut(xavier)\nforall x (Restive(x) -> Secretive(x))\n\nnot Restive(frederic)\n\nnot Restive(frederic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Rex is highbrowed. Rex is synoecious. Rex is feral. Rex is cuticular. Rex is not urban. Tab is highbrowed. Tab is urban. Tab is unspent. Tab is cutthroat. Noellyn is cuticular. Noellyn is cutthroat. Dian is synoecious. Dian is feral. Dian is cuticular. Dian is urban. If Dian is cuticular then Dian is feral. If something is cutthroat then it is feral. All feral things are unspent. If something is cutthroat and feral then it is synoecious. If Noellyn is unspent then Noellyn is highbrowed. If something is cutthroat then it is cuticular. Noellyn is urban.", "logic": "\nHighbrowed(rex)\nSynoecious(rex)\nFeral(rex)\nCuticular(rex)\nnot Urban(rex)\nHighbrowed(tab)\nUrban(tab)\nUnspent(tab)\nCutthroat(tab)\nCuticular(noellyn)\nCutthroat(noellyn)\nSynoecious(dian)\nFeral(dian)\nCuticular(dian)\nUrban(dian)\nCuticular(dian) -> Feral(dian)\nforall x (Cutthroat(x) -> Feral(x))\nforall x (Feral(x) -> Unspent(x))\nforall x (Cutthroat(x) and Feral(x) -> Synoecious(x))\nUnspent(noellyn) -> Highbrowed(noellyn)\nforall x (Cutthroat(x) -> Cuticular(x))\n\nUrban(noellyn)\n\nUrban(noellyn) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Web is tuneless. Web is late. Web is oblivious. Web is scrappy. Web is not intangible. Meg is tuneless. Meg is intangible. Meg is angelic. Meg is sublimated. Kirstie is scrappy. Kirstie is sublimated. Dougie is late. Dougie is oblivious. Dougie is scrappy. Dougie is intangible. If Dougie is scrappy then Dougie is oblivious. If something is sublimated then it is oblivious. All oblivious things are angelic. If something is sublimated and oblivious then it is late. If Kirstie is angelic then Kirstie is tuneless. If something is sublimated then it is scrappy. Dougie is not tuneless.", "logic": "\nTuneless(web)\nLate(web)\nOblivious(web)\nScrappy(web)\nnot Intangible(web)\nTuneless(meg)\nIntangible(meg)\nAngelic(meg)\nSublimated(meg)\nScrappy(kirstie)\nSublimated(kirstie)\nLate(dougie)\nOblivious(dougie)\nScrappy(dougie)\nIntangible(dougie)\nScrappy(dougie) -> Oblivious(dougie)\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> Oblivious(x))\nforall x (Oblivious(x) -> Angelic(x))\nforall x (Sublimated(x) and Oblivious(x) -> Late(x))\nAngelic(kirstie) -> Tuneless(kirstie)\nforall x (Sublimated(x) -> Scrappy(x))\n\nnot Tuneless(dougie)\n\nnot Tuneless(dougie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Selena is chronic. Selena is sciolistic. Selena is edwardian. Selena is chewable. Selena is not admittible. Seana is chronic. Seana is admittible. Seana is planar. Seana is inundated. Angel is chewable. Angel is inundated. Charita is sciolistic. Charita is edwardian. Charita is chewable. Charita is admittible. If Charita is chewable then Charita is edwardian. If something is inundated then it is edwardian. All edwardian things are planar. If something is inundated and edwardian then it is sciolistic. If Angel is planar then Angel is chronic. If something is inundated then it is chewable. Selena is inundated.", "logic": "\nChronic(selena)\nSciolistic(selena)\nEdwardian(selena)\nChewable(selena)\nnot Admittible(selena)\nChronic(seana)\nAdmittible(seana)\nPlanar(seana)\nInundated(seana)\nChewable(angel)\nInundated(angel)\nSciolistic(charita)\nEdwardian(charita)\nChewable(charita)\nAdmittible(charita)\nChewable(charita) -> Edwardian(charita)\nforall x (Inundated(x) -> Edwardian(x))\nforall x (Edwardian(x) -> Planar(x))\nforall x (Inundated(x) and Edwardian(x) -> Sciolistic(x))\nPlanar(angel) -> Chronic(angel)\nforall x (Inundated(x) -> Chewable(x))\n\nInundated(selena)\n\nInundated(selena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-1153"} {"premises": "Kalie is offending. Kalie is seeing. Kalie is nonaligned. Kalie is caroline. Bernd is basilar. Bernd is acetylic. Bernd is nonaligned. Parry is basilar. Parry is acetylic. Parry is seeing. Parry is nonaligned. Parry is caroline. Britaney is basilar. Britaney is nonaligned. Britaney is cynical. If Bernd is cynical and Bernd is basilar then Bernd is seeing. All acetylic people are caroline. Quiet, caroline people are cynical. Parry is basilar.", "logic": "\nOffending(kalie)\nSeeing(kalie)\nNonaligned(kalie)\nCaroline(kalie)\nBasilar(bernd)\nAcetylic(bernd)\nNonaligned(bernd)\nBasilar(parry)\nAcetylic(parry)\nSeeing(parry)\nNonaligned(parry)\nCaroline(parry)\nBasilar(britaney)\nNonaligned(britaney)\nCynical(britaney)\nCynical(bernd) and Basilar(bernd) -> Seeing(bernd)\nforall x (Acetylic(x) -> Caroline(x))\nforall x (Nonaligned(x) and Caroline(x) -> Cynical(x))\n\nBasilar(parry)\n\ntherefore Basilar(parry)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Aleda is scaley. Aleda is nightly. Aleda is wolfish. Aleda is sere. Jania is preclusive. Jania is fatherly. Jania is wolfish. Kristan is preclusive. Kristan is fatherly. Kristan is nightly. Kristan is wolfish. Kristan is sere. Roth is preclusive. Roth is wolfish. Roth is decadent. If Jania is decadent and Jania is preclusive then Jania is nightly. All fatherly people are sere. Quiet, sere people are decadent. Jania is not wolfish.", "logic": "\nScaley(aleda)\nNightly(aleda)\nWolfish(aleda)\nSere(aleda)\nPreclusive(jania)\nFatherly(jania)\nWolfish(jania)\nPreclusive(kristan)\nFatherly(kristan)\nNightly(kristan)\nWolfish(kristan)\nSere(kristan)\nPreclusive(roth)\nWolfish(roth)\nDecadent(roth)\nDecadent(jania) and Preclusive(jania) -> Nightly(jania)\nforall x (Fatherly(x) -> Sere(x))\nforall x (Wolfish(x) and Sere(x) -> Decadent(x))\n\nnot Wolfish(jania)\n\ntherefore Wolfish(jania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Friedrich is pretorian. Friedrich is passerine. Friedrich is veinal. Friedrich is unheated. Sidonnie is egyptian. Sidonnie is laudable. Sidonnie is veinal. Tedd is egyptian. Tedd is laudable. Tedd is passerine. Tedd is veinal. Tedd is unheated. Hilary is egyptian. Hilary is veinal. Hilary is pasteurian. If Sidonnie is pasteurian and Sidonnie is egyptian then Sidonnie is passerine. All laudable people are unheated. Quiet, unheated people are pasteurian. Tedd is pasteurian.", "logic": "\nPretorian(friedrich)\nPasserine(friedrich)\nVeinal(friedrich)\nUnheated(friedrich)\nEgyptian(sidonnie)\nLaudable(sidonnie)\nVeinal(sidonnie)\nEgyptian(tedd)\nLaudable(tedd)\nPasserine(tedd)\nVeinal(tedd)\nUnheated(tedd)\nEgyptian(hilary)\nVeinal(hilary)\nPasteurian(hilary)\nPasteurian(sidonnie) and Egyptian(sidonnie) -> Passerine(sidonnie)\nforall x (Laudable(x) -> Unheated(x))\nforall x (Veinal(x) and Unheated(x) -> Pasteurian(x))\n\nPasteurian(tedd)\n\nVeinal(tedd) and Unheated(tedd) and forall x (Veinal(x) and Unheated(x) -> Pasteurian(x)) -> therefore Pasteurian(tedd)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Adiana is depressing. Adiana is sagging. Adiana is underarm. Adiana is breakneck. Lyndy is monastical. Lyndy is afloat. Lyndy is underarm. Lawson is monastical. Lawson is afloat. Lawson is sagging. Lawson is underarm. Lawson is breakneck. Batsheva is monastical. Batsheva is underarm. Batsheva is unsloped. If Lyndy is unsloped and Lyndy is monastical then Lyndy is sagging. All afloat people are breakneck. Quiet, breakneck people are unsloped. Lawson is not unsloped.", "logic": "\nDepressing(adiana)\nSagging(adiana)\nUnderarm(adiana)\nBreakneck(adiana)\nMonastical(lyndy)\nAfloat(lyndy)\nUnderarm(lyndy)\nMonastical(lawson)\nAfloat(lawson)\nSagging(lawson)\nUnderarm(lawson)\nBreakneck(lawson)\nMonastical(batsheva)\nUnderarm(batsheva)\nUnsloped(batsheva)\nUnsloped(lyndy) and Monastical(lyndy) -> Sagging(lyndy)\nforall x (Afloat(x) -> Breakneck(x))\nforall x (Underarm(x) and Breakneck(x) -> Unsloped(x))\n\nnot Unsloped(lawson)\n\nUnderarm(lawson) and Breakneck(lawson) and forall x (Underarm(x) and Breakneck(x) -> Unsloped(x)) -> therefore Unsloped(lawson)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Bay is isolating. Bay is derogatory. Bay is jetting. Bay is publicised. Marga is extirpable. Marga is sensory. Marga is jetting. Dorine is extirpable. Dorine is sensory. Dorine is derogatory. Dorine is jetting. Dorine is publicised. Anny is extirpable. Anny is jetting. Anny is katabatic. If Marga is katabatic and Marga is extirpable then Marga is derogatory. All sensory people are publicised. Quiet, publicised people are katabatic. Marga is katabatic.", "logic": "\nIsolating(bay)\nDerogatory(bay)\nJetting(bay)\nPublicised(bay)\nExtirpable(marga)\nSensory(marga)\nJetting(marga)\nExtirpable(dorine)\nSensory(dorine)\nDerogatory(dorine)\nJetting(dorine)\nPublicised(dorine)\nExtirpable(anny)\nJetting(anny)\nKatabatic(anny)\nKatabatic(marga) and Extirpable(marga) -> Derogatory(marga)\nforall x (Sensory(x) -> Publicised(x))\nforall x (Jetting(x) and Publicised(x) -> Katabatic(x))\n\nKatabatic(marga)\n\nSensory(marga) and forall x (Sensory(x) -> Publicised(x)) -> therefore Publicised(marga) Jetting(marga) and Publicised(marga) and forall x (Jetting(x) and Publicised(x) -> Katabatic(x)) -> therefore Katabatic(marga)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Aubrey is petrous. Aubrey is wheezing. Aubrey is numinous. Aubrey is algophobic. Donal is volumetric. Donal is creaseless. Donal is numinous. Nicki is volumetric. Nicki is creaseless. Nicki is wheezing. Nicki is numinous. Nicki is algophobic. Marcille is volumetric. Marcille is numinous. Marcille is venomed. If Donal is venomed and Donal is volumetric then Donal is wheezing. All creaseless people are algophobic. Quiet, algophobic people are venomed. Donal is not venomed.", "logic": "\nPetrous(aubrey)\nWheezing(aubrey)\nNuminous(aubrey)\nAlgophobic(aubrey)\nVolumetric(donal)\nCreaseless(donal)\nNuminous(donal)\nVolumetric(nicki)\nCreaseless(nicki)\nWheezing(nicki)\nNuminous(nicki)\nAlgophobic(nicki)\nVolumetric(marcille)\nNuminous(marcille)\nVenomed(marcille)\nVenomed(donal) and Volumetric(donal) -> Wheezing(donal)\nforall x (Creaseless(x) -> Algophobic(x))\nforall x (Numinous(x) and Algophobic(x) -> Venomed(x))\n\nnot Venomed(donal)\n\nCreaseless(donal) and forall x (Creaseless(x) -> Algophobic(x)) -> therefore Algophobic(donal) Numinous(donal) and Algophobic(donal) and forall x (Numinous(x) and Algophobic(x) -> Venomed(x)) -> therefore Venomed(donal)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Annalyse is eupnoeic. Annalyse is biloculate. Annalyse is bugged. Annalyse is splattered. Katti is humified. Katti is tender. Katti is bugged. Bradford is humified. Bradford is tender. Bradford is biloculate. Bradford is bugged. Bradford is splattered. Kurt is humified. Kurt is bugged. Kurt is born. If Katti is born and Katti is humified then Katti is biloculate. All tender people are splattered. Quiet, splattered people are born. Katti is biloculate.", "logic": "\nEupnoeic(annalyse)\nBiloculate(annalyse)\nBugged(annalyse)\nSplattered(annalyse)\nHumified(katti)\nTender(katti)\nBugged(katti)\nHumified(bradford)\nTender(bradford)\nBiloculate(bradford)\nBugged(bradford)\nSplattered(bradford)\nHumified(kurt)\nBugged(kurt)\nBorn(kurt)\nBorn(katti) and Humified(katti) -> Biloculate(katti)\nforall x (Tender(x) -> Splattered(x))\nforall x (Bugged(x) and Splattered(x) -> Born(x))\n\nBiloculate(katti)\n\nTender(katti) and forall x (Tender(x) -> Splattered(x)) -> therefore Splattered(katti) Bugged(katti) and Splattered(katti) and forall x (Bugged(x) and Splattered(x) -> Born(x)) -> therefore Born(katti) Born(katti) and Humified(katti) and Born(katti) and Humified(katti) -> Biloculate(katti) -> therefore Biloculate(katti)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Morena is choragic. Morena is ursine. Morena is endodontic. Morena is dutiable. Sonny is unequaled. Sonny is cuddlesome. Sonny is endodontic. Gunilla is unequaled. Gunilla is cuddlesome. Gunilla is ursine. Gunilla is endodontic. Gunilla is dutiable. Harcourt is unequaled. Harcourt is endodontic. Harcourt is unbranched. If Sonny is unbranched and Sonny is unequaled then Sonny is ursine. All cuddlesome people are dutiable. Quiet, dutiable people are unbranched. Sonny is not ursine.", "logic": "\nChoragic(morena)\nUrsine(morena)\nEndodontic(morena)\nDutiable(morena)\nUnequaled(sonny)\nCuddlesome(sonny)\nEndodontic(sonny)\nUnequaled(gunilla)\nCuddlesome(gunilla)\nUrsine(gunilla)\nEndodontic(gunilla)\nDutiable(gunilla)\nUnequaled(harcourt)\nEndodontic(harcourt)\nUnbranched(harcourt)\nUnbranched(sonny) and Unequaled(sonny) -> Ursine(sonny)\nforall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Dutiable(x))\nforall x (Endodontic(x) and Dutiable(x) -> Unbranched(x))\n\nnot Ursine(sonny)\n\nCuddlesome(sonny) and forall x (Cuddlesome(x) -> Dutiable(x)) -> therefore Dutiable(sonny) Endodontic(sonny) and Dutiable(sonny) and forall x (Endodontic(x) and Dutiable(x) -> Unbranched(x)) -> therefore Unbranched(sonny) Unbranched(sonny) and Unequaled(sonny) and Unbranched(sonny) and Unequaled(sonny) -> Ursine(sonny) -> therefore Ursine(sonny)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Moyna is meshugge. Moyna is appalled. Moyna is sceptered. Moyna is hunched. Opal is enraptured. Opal is ungreased. Opal is sceptered. Kissie is enraptured. Kissie is ungreased. Kissie is appalled. Kissie is sceptered. Kissie is hunched. Salmon is enraptured. Salmon is sceptered. Salmon is rodlike. If Opal is rodlike and Opal is enraptured then Opal is appalled. All ungreased people are hunched. Quiet, hunched people are rodlike. Salmon is not hunched.", "logic": "\nMeshugge(moyna)\nAppalled(moyna)\nSceptered(moyna)\nHunched(moyna)\nEnraptured(opal)\nUngreased(opal)\nSceptered(opal)\nEnraptured(kissie)\nUngreased(kissie)\nAppalled(kissie)\nSceptered(kissie)\nHunched(kissie)\nEnraptured(salmon)\nSceptered(salmon)\nRodlike(salmon)\nRodlike(opal) and Enraptured(opal) -> Appalled(opal)\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> Hunched(x))\nforall x (Sceptered(x) and Hunched(x) -> Rodlike(x))\n\nnot Hunched(salmon)\n\nforall x (Ungreased(x) -> Hunched(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Darrell is evident. Darrell is harnessed. Darrell is caller. Darrell is oiled. Cleland is excusatory. Cleland is determined. Cleland is caller. Clare is excusatory. Clare is determined. Clare is harnessed. Clare is caller. Clare is oiled. Granville is excusatory. Granville is caller. Granville is discursive. If Cleland is discursive and Cleland is excusatory then Cleland is harnessed. All determined people are oiled. Quiet, oiled people are discursive. Darrell is determined.", "logic": "\nEvident(darrell)\nHarnessed(darrell)\nCaller(darrell)\nOiled(darrell)\nExcusatory(cleland)\nDetermined(cleland)\nCaller(cleland)\nExcusatory(clare)\nDetermined(clare)\nHarnessed(clare)\nCaller(clare)\nOiled(clare)\nExcusatory(granville)\nCaller(granville)\nDiscursive(granville)\nDiscursive(cleland) and Excusatory(cleland) -> Harnessed(cleland)\nforall x (Determined(x) -> Oiled(x))\nforall x (Caller(x) and Oiled(x) -> Discursive(x))\n\nDetermined(darrell)\n\nDetermined(darrell) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Viviene is forceless. Viviene is toadyish. Viviene is charged. Viviene is decayable. Lorraine is splanchnic. Lorraine is aerobic. Lorraine is charged. Ludwig is splanchnic. Ludwig is aerobic. Ludwig is toadyish. Ludwig is charged. Ludwig is decayable. Brianna is splanchnic. Brianna is charged. Brianna is vestigial. If Lorraine is vestigial and Lorraine is splanchnic then Lorraine is toadyish. All aerobic people are decayable. Quiet, decayable people are vestigial. Lorraine is not forceless.", "logic": "\nForceless(viviene)\nToadyish(viviene)\nCharged(viviene)\nDecayable(viviene)\nSplanchnic(lorraine)\nAerobic(lorraine)\nCharged(lorraine)\nSplanchnic(ludwig)\nAerobic(ludwig)\nToadyish(ludwig)\nCharged(ludwig)\nDecayable(ludwig)\nSplanchnic(brianna)\nCharged(brianna)\nVestigial(brianna)\nVestigial(lorraine) and Splanchnic(lorraine) -> Toadyish(lorraine)\nforall x (Aerobic(x) -> Decayable(x))\nforall x (Charged(x) and Decayable(x) -> Vestigial(x))\n\nnot Forceless(lorraine)\n\nnot Forceless(lorraine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Jervis is scrivened. Jervis is searing. Jervis is many. Jervis is specious. Didi is petaloid. Didi is chockful. Didi is many. Ophelie is petaloid. Ophelie is chockful. Ophelie is searing. Ophelie is many. Ophelie is specious. Tonia is petaloid. Tonia is many. Tonia is clubbable. If Didi is clubbable and Didi is petaloid then Didi is searing. All chockful people are specious. Quiet, specious people are clubbable. Tonia is searing.", "logic": "\nScrivened(jervis)\nSearing(jervis)\nMany(jervis)\nSpecious(jervis)\nPetaloid(didi)\nChockful(didi)\nMany(didi)\nPetaloid(ophelie)\nChockful(ophelie)\nSearing(ophelie)\nMany(ophelie)\nSpecious(ophelie)\nPetaloid(tonia)\nMany(tonia)\nClubbable(tonia)\nClubbable(didi) and Petaloid(didi) -> Searing(didi)\nforall x (Chockful(x) -> Specious(x))\nforall x (Many(x) and Specious(x) -> Clubbable(x))\n\nSearing(tonia)\n\nSearing(tonia) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Wilbur is jovian. Wilbur is peripteral. Wilbur is unbigoted. Wilbur is patched. Annissa is olympian. Annissa is levorotary. Annissa is unbigoted. Rebekah is olympian. Rebekah is levorotary. Rebekah is peripteral. Rebekah is unbigoted. Rebekah is patched. Alonso is olympian. Alonso is unbigoted. Alonso is dioecious. If Annissa is dioecious and Annissa is olympian then Annissa is peripteral. All levorotary people are patched. Quiet, patched people are dioecious. Wilbur is not olympian.", "logic": "\nJovian(wilbur)\nPeripteral(wilbur)\nUnbigoted(wilbur)\nPatched(wilbur)\nOlympian(annissa)\nLevorotary(annissa)\nUnbigoted(annissa)\nOlympian(rebekah)\nLevorotary(rebekah)\nPeripteral(rebekah)\nUnbigoted(rebekah)\nPatched(rebekah)\nOlympian(alonso)\nUnbigoted(alonso)\nDioecious(alonso)\nDioecious(annissa) and Olympian(annissa) -> Peripteral(annissa)\nforall x (Levorotary(x) -> Patched(x))\nforall x (Unbigoted(x) and Patched(x) -> Dioecious(x))\n\nnot Olympian(wilbur)\n\nnot Olympian(wilbur) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Stevena is prodromic. Stevena is liveborn. Stevena is virtuous. Stevena is orotund. Loraine is antarctic. Loraine is unsilenced. Loraine is virtuous. Xena is antarctic. Xena is unsilenced. Xena is liveborn. Xena is virtuous. Xena is orotund. Jackie is antarctic. Jackie is virtuous. Jackie is consonant. If Loraine is consonant and Loraine is antarctic then Loraine is liveborn. All unsilenced people are orotund. Quiet, orotund people are consonant. Xena is prodromic.", "logic": "\nProdromic(stevena)\nLiveborn(stevena)\nVirtuous(stevena)\nOrotund(stevena)\nAntarctic(loraine)\nUnsilenced(loraine)\nVirtuous(loraine)\nAntarctic(xena)\nUnsilenced(xena)\nLiveborn(xena)\nVirtuous(xena)\nOrotund(xena)\nAntarctic(jackie)\nVirtuous(jackie)\nConsonant(jackie)\nConsonant(loraine) and Antarctic(loraine) -> Liveborn(loraine)\nforall x (Unsilenced(x) -> Orotund(x))\nforall x (Virtuous(x) and Orotund(x) -> Consonant(x))\n\nProdromic(xena)\n\nProdromic(xena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Kenny is unimproved. Kenny is cumuliform. Kenny is wrapped. Kenny is celtic. Nate is perpetual. Nate is silken. Nate is wrapped. Marius is perpetual. Marius is silken. Marius is cumuliform. Marius is wrapped. Marius is celtic. Churchill is perpetual. Churchill is wrapped. Churchill is hardheaded. If Nate is hardheaded and Nate is perpetual then Nate is cumuliform. All silken people are celtic. Quiet, celtic people are hardheaded. Churchill is not unimproved.", "logic": "\nUnimproved(kenny)\nCumuliform(kenny)\nWrapped(kenny)\nCeltic(kenny)\nPerpetual(nate)\nSilken(nate)\nWrapped(nate)\nPerpetual(marius)\nSilken(marius)\nCumuliform(marius)\nWrapped(marius)\nCeltic(marius)\nPerpetual(churchill)\nWrapped(churchill)\nHardheaded(churchill)\nHardheaded(nate) and Perpetual(nate) -> Cumuliform(nate)\nforall x (Silken(x) -> Celtic(x))\nforall x (Wrapped(x) and Celtic(x) -> Hardheaded(x))\n\nnot Unimproved(churchill)\n\nnot Unimproved(churchill) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Rubia is darling. Rubia is numberless. Rubia is raring. Rubia is unproved. Madelaine is amicable. Madelaine is plentiful. Madelaine is raring. Stephanie is amicable. Stephanie is plentiful. Stephanie is numberless. Stephanie is raring. Stephanie is unproved. Gilberta is amicable. Gilberta is raring. Gilberta is maoist. If Madelaine is maoist and Madelaine is amicable then Madelaine is numberless. All plentiful people are unproved. Quiet, unproved people are maoist. Gilberta is plentiful.", "logic": "\nDarling(rubia)\nNumberless(rubia)\nRaring(rubia)\nUnproved(rubia)\nAmicable(madelaine)\nPlentiful(madelaine)\nRaring(madelaine)\nAmicable(stephanie)\nPlentiful(stephanie)\nNumberless(stephanie)\nRaring(stephanie)\nUnproved(stephanie)\nAmicable(gilberta)\nRaring(gilberta)\nMaoist(gilberta)\nMaoist(madelaine) and Amicable(madelaine) -> Numberless(madelaine)\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> Unproved(x))\nforall x (Raring(x) and Unproved(x) -> Maoist(x))\n\nPlentiful(gilberta)\n\nPlentiful(gilberta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1820"} {"premises": "Thom is occlusive. Thom is lubberly. Thom is friable. Ned is occlusive. Ned is redeeming. Ned is lubberly. Ned is accustomed. Ned is broad. Ned is pompous. Ned is friable. Audrie is occlusive. Audrie is redeeming. Audrie is lubberly. Audrie is accustomed. Audrie is broad. Audrie is friable. If Thom is friable and Thom is lubberly then Thom is occlusive. All occlusive, friable people are pompous. White people are accustomed. If someone is occlusive and redeeming then they are lubberly. If Thom is accustomed and Thom is occlusive then Thom is friable. If someone is accustomed then they are broad. If someone is redeeming and pompous then they are accustomed. If Audrie is redeeming then Audrie is broad. Ned is pompous.", "logic": "\nOcclusive(thom)\nLubberly(thom)\nFriable(thom)\nOcclusive(ned)\nRedeeming(ned)\nLubberly(ned)\nAccustomed(ned)\nBroad(ned)\nPompous(ned)\nFriable(ned)\nOcclusive(audrie)\nRedeeming(audrie)\nLubberly(audrie)\nAccustomed(audrie)\nBroad(audrie)\nFriable(audrie)\nFriable(thom) and Lubberly(thom) -> Occlusive(thom)\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Friable(x) -> Pompous(x))\nforall x (Pompous(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nforall x (Occlusive(x) and Redeeming(x) -> Lubberly(x))\nAccustomed(thom) and Occlusive(thom) -> Friable(thom)\nforall x (Accustomed(x) -> Broad(x))\nforall x (Redeeming(x) and Pompous(x) -> Accustomed(x))\nRedeeming(audrie) -> Broad(audrie)\n\nPompous(ned)\n\ntherefore Pompous(ned)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Liorah is reckless. Liorah is daedal. Liorah is hyperfine. Cherin is reckless. Cherin is thyrotoxic. Cherin is daedal. Cherin is unwoven. Cherin is flexile. Cherin is detected. Cherin is hyperfine. Lolly is reckless. Lolly is thyrotoxic. Lolly is daedal. Lolly is unwoven. Lolly is flexile. Lolly is hyperfine. If Liorah is hyperfine and Liorah is daedal then Liorah is reckless. All reckless, hyperfine people are detected. White people are unwoven. If someone is reckless and thyrotoxic then they are daedal. If Liorah is unwoven and Liorah is reckless then Liorah is hyperfine. If someone is unwoven then they are flexile. If someone is thyrotoxic and detected then they are unwoven. If Lolly is thyrotoxic then Lolly is flexile. Lolly is not flexile.", "logic": "\nReckless(liorah)\nDaedal(liorah)\nHyperfine(liorah)\nReckless(cherin)\nThyrotoxic(cherin)\nDaedal(cherin)\nUnwoven(cherin)\nFlexile(cherin)\nDetected(cherin)\nHyperfine(cherin)\nReckless(lolly)\nThyrotoxic(lolly)\nDaedal(lolly)\nUnwoven(lolly)\nFlexile(lolly)\nHyperfine(lolly)\nHyperfine(liorah) and Daedal(liorah) -> Reckless(liorah)\nforall x (Reckless(x) and Hyperfine(x) -> Detected(x))\nforall x (Detected(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nforall x (Reckless(x) and Thyrotoxic(x) -> Daedal(x))\nUnwoven(liorah) and Reckless(liorah) -> Hyperfine(liorah)\nforall x (Unwoven(x) -> Flexile(x))\nforall x (Thyrotoxic(x) and Detected(x) -> Unwoven(x))\nThyrotoxic(lolly) -> Flexile(lolly)\n\nnot Flexile(lolly)\n\ntherefore Flexile(lolly)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Loni is censored. Loni is gratified. Loni is exogamic. Silvana is censored. Silvana is weightless. Silvana is gratified. Silvana is scots. Silvana is thieving. Silvana is european. Silvana is exogamic. Fran is censored. Fran is weightless. Fran is gratified. Fran is scots. Fran is thieving. Fran is exogamic. If Loni is exogamic and Loni is gratified then Loni is censored. All censored, exogamic people are european. White people are scots. If someone is censored and weightless then they are gratified. If Loni is scots and Loni is censored then Loni is exogamic. If someone is scots then they are thieving. If someone is weightless and european then they are scots. If Fran is weightless then Fran is thieving. Loni is european.", "logic": "\nCensored(loni)\nGratified(loni)\nExogamic(loni)\nCensored(silvana)\nWeightless(silvana)\nGratified(silvana)\nScots(silvana)\nThieving(silvana)\nEuropean(silvana)\nExogamic(silvana)\nCensored(fran)\nWeightless(fran)\nGratified(fran)\nScots(fran)\nThieving(fran)\nExogamic(fran)\nExogamic(loni) and Gratified(loni) -> Censored(loni)\nforall x (Censored(x) and Exogamic(x) -> European(x))\nforall x (European(x) -> Scots(x))\nforall x (Censored(x) and Weightless(x) -> Gratified(x))\nScots(loni) and Censored(loni) -> Exogamic(loni)\nforall x (Scots(x) -> Thieving(x))\nforall x (Weightless(x) and European(x) -> Scots(x))\nWeightless(fran) -> Thieving(fran)\n\nEuropean(loni)\n\nCensored(loni) and Exogamic(loni) and forall x (Censored(x) and Exogamic(x) -> European(x)) -> therefore European(loni)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Anna is pureblood. Anna is magnetized. Anna is modish. Douglass is pureblood. Douglass is pilary. Douglass is magnetized. Douglass is dandy. Douglass is lacteal. Douglass is liplike. Douglass is modish. Aida is pureblood. Aida is pilary. Aida is magnetized. Aida is dandy. Aida is lacteal. Aida is modish. If Anna is modish and Anna is magnetized then Anna is pureblood. All pureblood, modish people are liplike. White people are dandy. If someone is pureblood and pilary then they are magnetized. If Anna is dandy and Anna is pureblood then Anna is modish. If someone is dandy then they are lacteal. If someone is pilary and liplike then they are dandy. If Aida is pilary then Aida is lacteal. Anna is not liplike.", "logic": "\nPureblood(anna)\nMagnetized(anna)\nModish(anna)\nPureblood(douglass)\nPilary(douglass)\nMagnetized(douglass)\nDandy(douglass)\nLacteal(douglass)\nLiplike(douglass)\nModish(douglass)\nPureblood(aida)\nPilary(aida)\nMagnetized(aida)\nDandy(aida)\nLacteal(aida)\nModish(aida)\nModish(anna) and Magnetized(anna) -> Pureblood(anna)\nforall x (Pureblood(x) and Modish(x) -> Liplike(x))\nforall x (Liplike(x) -> Dandy(x))\nforall x (Pureblood(x) and Pilary(x) -> Magnetized(x))\nDandy(anna) and Pureblood(anna) -> Modish(anna)\nforall x (Dandy(x) -> Lacteal(x))\nforall x (Pilary(x) and Liplike(x) -> Dandy(x))\nPilary(aida) -> Lacteal(aida)\n\nnot Liplike(anna)\n\nPureblood(anna) and Modish(anna) and forall x (Pureblood(x) and Modish(x) -> Liplike(x)) -> therefore Liplike(anna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Shannah is unsecured. Shannah is sericeous. Shannah is lemony. Adrick is unsecured. Adrick is inspired. Adrick is sericeous. Adrick is urbanised. Adrick is teeming. Adrick is edacious. Adrick is lemony. Rebeca is unsecured. Rebeca is inspired. Rebeca is sericeous. Rebeca is urbanised. Rebeca is teeming. Rebeca is lemony. If Shannah is lemony and Shannah is sericeous then Shannah is unsecured. All unsecured, lemony people are edacious. White people are urbanised. If someone is unsecured and inspired then they are sericeous. If Shannah is urbanised and Shannah is unsecured then Shannah is lemony. If someone is urbanised then they are teeming. If someone is inspired and edacious then they are urbanised. If Rebeca is inspired then Rebeca is teeming. Shannah is urbanised.", "logic": "\nUnsecured(shannah)\nSericeous(shannah)\nLemony(shannah)\nUnsecured(adrick)\nInspired(adrick)\nSericeous(adrick)\nUrbanised(adrick)\nTeeming(adrick)\nEdacious(adrick)\nLemony(adrick)\nUnsecured(rebeca)\nInspired(rebeca)\nSericeous(rebeca)\nUrbanised(rebeca)\nTeeming(rebeca)\nLemony(rebeca)\nLemony(shannah) and Sericeous(shannah) -> Unsecured(shannah)\nforall x (Unsecured(x) and Lemony(x) -> Edacious(x))\nforall x (Edacious(x) -> Urbanised(x))\nforall x (Unsecured(x) and Inspired(x) -> Sericeous(x))\nUrbanised(shannah) and Unsecured(shannah) -> Lemony(shannah)\nforall x (Urbanised(x) -> Teeming(x))\nforall x (Inspired(x) and Edacious(x) -> Urbanised(x))\nInspired(rebeca) -> Teeming(rebeca)\n\nUrbanised(shannah)\n\nUnsecured(shannah) and Lemony(shannah) and forall x (Unsecured(x) and Lemony(x) -> Edacious(x)) -> therefore Edacious(shannah) Edacious(shannah) and forall x (Edacious(x) -> Urbanised(x)) -> therefore Urbanised(shannah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Marti is aramaic. Marti is knockout. Marti is stemmed. Ferne is aramaic. Ferne is menacing. Ferne is knockout. Ferne is glassed. Ferne is limbed. Ferne is incomplete. Ferne is stemmed. Nina is aramaic. Nina is menacing. Nina is knockout. Nina is glassed. Nina is limbed. Nina is stemmed. If Marti is stemmed and Marti is knockout then Marti is aramaic. All aramaic, stemmed people are incomplete. White people are glassed. If someone is aramaic and menacing then they are knockout. If Marti is glassed and Marti is aramaic then Marti is stemmed. If someone is glassed then they are limbed. If someone is menacing and incomplete then they are glassed. If Nina is menacing then Nina is limbed. Marti is not glassed.", "logic": "\nAramaic(marti)\nKnockout(marti)\nStemmed(marti)\nAramaic(ferne)\nMenacing(ferne)\nKnockout(ferne)\nGlassed(ferne)\nLimbed(ferne)\nIncomplete(ferne)\nStemmed(ferne)\nAramaic(nina)\nMenacing(nina)\nKnockout(nina)\nGlassed(nina)\nLimbed(nina)\nStemmed(nina)\nStemmed(marti) and Knockout(marti) -> Aramaic(marti)\nforall x (Aramaic(x) and Stemmed(x) -> Incomplete(x))\nforall x (Incomplete(x) -> Glassed(x))\nforall x (Aramaic(x) and Menacing(x) -> Knockout(x))\nGlassed(marti) and Aramaic(marti) -> Stemmed(marti)\nforall x (Glassed(x) -> Limbed(x))\nforall x (Menacing(x) and Incomplete(x) -> Glassed(x))\nMenacing(nina) -> Limbed(nina)\n\nnot Glassed(marti)\n\nAramaic(marti) and Stemmed(marti) and forall x (Aramaic(x) and Stemmed(x) -> Incomplete(x)) -> therefore Incomplete(marti) Incomplete(marti) and forall x (Incomplete(x) -> Glassed(x)) -> therefore Glassed(marti)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Shanna is bisexual. Shanna is returnable. Shanna is austere. Jobi is bisexual. Jobi is grown. Jobi is returnable. Jobi is carnal. Jobi is soured. Jobi is revenant. Jobi is austere. Quent is bisexual. Quent is grown. Quent is returnable. Quent is carnal. Quent is soured. Quent is austere. If Shanna is austere and Shanna is returnable then Shanna is bisexual. All bisexual, austere people are revenant. White people are carnal. If someone is bisexual and grown then they are returnable. If Shanna is carnal and Shanna is bisexual then Shanna is austere. If someone is carnal then they are soured. If someone is grown and revenant then they are carnal. If Quent is grown then Quent is soured. Shanna is soured.", "logic": "\nBisexual(shanna)\nReturnable(shanna)\nAustere(shanna)\nBisexual(jobi)\nGrown(jobi)\nReturnable(jobi)\nCarnal(jobi)\nSoured(jobi)\nRevenant(jobi)\nAustere(jobi)\nBisexual(quent)\nGrown(quent)\nReturnable(quent)\nCarnal(quent)\nSoured(quent)\nAustere(quent)\nAustere(shanna) and Returnable(shanna) -> Bisexual(shanna)\nforall x (Bisexual(x) and Austere(x) -> Revenant(x))\nforall x (Revenant(x) -> Carnal(x))\nforall x (Bisexual(x) and Grown(x) -> Returnable(x))\nCarnal(shanna) and Bisexual(shanna) -> Austere(shanna)\nforall x (Carnal(x) -> Soured(x))\nforall x (Grown(x) and Revenant(x) -> Carnal(x))\nGrown(quent) -> Soured(quent)\n\nSoured(shanna)\n\nBisexual(shanna) and Austere(shanna) and forall x (Bisexual(x) and Austere(x) -> Revenant(x)) -> therefore Revenant(shanna) Revenant(shanna) and forall x (Revenant(x) -> Carnal(x)) -> therefore Carnal(shanna) Carnal(shanna) and forall x (Carnal(x) -> Soured(x)) -> therefore Soured(shanna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "Agretha is unsexed. Agretha is tiresome. Agretha is plumate. Adriane is unsexed. Adriane is guyanese. Adriane is tiresome. Adriane is jobless. Adriane is maculate. Adriane is baccate. Adriane is plumate. Ike is unsexed. Ike is guyanese. Ike is tiresome. Ike is jobless. Ike is maculate. Ike is plumate. If Agretha is plumate and Agretha is tiresome then Agretha is unsexed. All unsexed, plumate people are baccate. White people are jobless. If someone is unsexed and guyanese then they are tiresome. If Agretha is jobless and Agretha is unsexed then Agretha is plumate. If someone is jobless then they are maculate. If someone is guyanese and baccate then they are jobless. If Ike is guyanese then Ike is maculate. Agretha is not maculate.", "logic": "\nUnsexed(agretha)\nTiresome(agretha)\nPlumate(agretha)\nUnsexed(adriane)\nGuyanese(adriane)\nTiresome(adriane)\nJobless(adriane)\nMaculate(adriane)\nBaccate(adriane)\nPlumate(adriane)\nUnsexed(ike)\nGuyanese(ike)\nTiresome(ike)\nJobless(ike)\nMaculate(ike)\nPlumate(ike)\nPlumate(agretha) and Tiresome(agretha) -> Unsexed(agretha)\nforall x (Unsexed(x) and Plumate(x) -> Baccate(x))\nforall x (Baccate(x) -> Jobless(x))\nforall x (Unsexed(x) and Guyanese(x) -> Tiresome(x))\nJobless(agretha) and Unsexed(agretha) -> Plumate(agretha)\nforall x (Jobless(x) -> Maculate(x))\nforall x (Guyanese(x) and Baccate(x) -> Jobless(x))\nGuyanese(ike) -> Maculate(ike)\n\nnot Maculate(agretha)\n\nUnsexed(agretha) and Plumate(agretha) and forall x (Unsexed(x) and Plumate(x) -> Baccate(x)) -> therefore Baccate(agretha) Baccate(agretha) and forall x (Baccate(x) -> Jobless(x)) -> therefore Jobless(agretha) Jobless(agretha) and forall x (Jobless(x) -> Maculate(x)) -> therefore Maculate(agretha)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-846"} {"premises": "The faydra hulk the alexander. The faydra is attentive. The faydra till the alexander. The alexander hulk the faydra. The alexander is unvendible. The alexander till the faydra. The alexander scalp the faydra. If the alexander scalp the faydra then the faydra is attentive. If something is unratable then it is attentive. If something till the alexander then the alexander is unratable. If something scalp the alexander then it hulk the alexander. If the faydra hulk the alexander then the alexander is unvendible. If the alexander is attentive and the alexander hulk the faydra then the alexander is armenian. The faydra is attentive.", "logic": "\nHulk(faydra, alexander)\nAttentive(faydra)\nTill(faydra, alexander)\nHulk(alexander, faydra)\nUnvendible(alexander)\nTill(alexander, faydra)\nScalp(alexander, faydra)\nScalp(alexander, faydra) -> Attentive(faydra)\nforall x (Unratable(x) -> Attentive(x))\nforall x (Till(x, alexander) -> Unratable(alexander))\nforall x (Scalp(x, alexander) -> Hulk(x, alexander))\nHulk(faydra, alexander) -> Unvendible(alexander)\nAttentive(alexander) and Hulk(alexander, faydra) -> Armenian(alexander)\n\nAttentive(faydra)\n\ntherefore Attentive(faydra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The nan piggyback the ozzie. The nan is personable. The nan bonnet the ozzie. The ozzie piggyback the nan. The ozzie is thirteenth. The ozzie bonnet the nan. The ozzie gravel the nan. If the ozzie gravel the nan then the nan is personable. If something is selfsame then it is personable. If something bonnet the ozzie then the ozzie is selfsame. If something gravel the ozzie then it piggyback the ozzie. If the nan piggyback the ozzie then the ozzie is thirteenth. If the ozzie is personable and the ozzie piggyback the nan then the ozzie is aligned. The nan does not chase the ozzie.", "logic": "\nPiggyback(nan, ozzie)\nPersonable(nan)\nBonnet(nan, ozzie)\nPiggyback(ozzie, nan)\nThirteenth(ozzie)\nBonnet(ozzie, nan)\nGravel(ozzie, nan)\nGravel(ozzie, nan) -> Personable(nan)\nforall x (Selfsame(x) -> Personable(x))\nforall x (Bonnet(x, ozzie) -> Selfsame(ozzie))\nforall x (Gravel(x, ozzie) -> Piggyback(x, ozzie))\nPiggyback(nan, ozzie) -> Thirteenth(ozzie)\nPersonable(ozzie) and Piggyback(ozzie, nan) -> Aligned(ozzie)\n\nnot Piggyback(nan, ozzie)\n\ntherefore Piggyback(nan, ozzie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The rycca wangle the ronen. The rycca is dreary. The rycca analogize the ronen. The ronen wangle the rycca. The ronen is submerged. The ronen analogize the rycca. The ronen branch the rycca. If the ronen branch the rycca then the rycca is dreary. If something is tsarist then it is dreary. If something analogize the ronen then the ronen is tsarist. If something branch the ronen then it wangle the ronen. If the rycca wangle the ronen then the ronen is submerged. If the ronen is dreary and the ronen wangle the rycca then the ronen is irritative. The ronen is tsarist.", "logic": "\nWangle(rycca, ronen)\nDreary(rycca)\nAnalogize(rycca, ronen)\nWangle(ronen, rycca)\nSubmerged(ronen)\nAnalogize(ronen, rycca)\nBranch(ronen, rycca)\nBranch(ronen, rycca) -> Dreary(rycca)\nforall x (Tsarist(x) -> Dreary(x))\nforall x (Analogize(x, ronen) -> Tsarist(ronen))\nforall x (Branch(x, ronen) -> Wangle(x, ronen))\nWangle(rycca, ronen) -> Submerged(ronen)\nDreary(ronen) and Wangle(ronen, rycca) -> Irritative(ronen)\n\nTsarist(ronen)\n\nAnalogize(rycca, ronen) and forall x (Analogize(x, ronen) -> Tsarist(ronen)) -> therefore Tsarist(ronen)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The laetitia stopper the jud. The laetitia is unequipped. The laetitia identify the jud. The jud stopper the laetitia. The jud is sufficient. The jud identify the laetitia. The jud scalp the laetitia. If the jud scalp the laetitia then the laetitia is unequipped. If something is stilted then it is unequipped. If something identify the jud then the jud is stilted. If something scalp the jud then it stopper the jud. If the laetitia stopper the jud then the jud is sufficient. If the jud is unequipped and the jud stopper the laetitia then the jud is blinking. The jud is not stilted.", "logic": "\nStopper(laetitia, jud)\nUnequipped(laetitia)\nIdentify(laetitia, jud)\nStopper(jud, laetitia)\nSufficient(jud)\nIdentify(jud, laetitia)\nScalp(jud, laetitia)\nScalp(jud, laetitia) -> Unequipped(laetitia)\nforall x (Stilted(x) -> Unequipped(x))\nforall x (Identify(x, jud) -> Stilted(jud))\nforall x (Scalp(x, jud) -> Stopper(x, jud))\nStopper(laetitia, jud) -> Sufficient(jud)\nUnequipped(jud) and Stopper(jud, laetitia) -> Blinking(jud)\n\nnot Stilted(jud)\n\nIdentify(laetitia, jud) and forall x (Identify(x, jud) -> Stilted(jud)) -> therefore Stilted(jud)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The queada curtsey the maude. The queada is attired. The queada stave the maude. The maude curtsey the queada. The maude is swollen. The maude stave the queada. The maude ebonise the queada. If the maude ebonise the queada then the queada is attired. If something is spunky then it is attired. If something stave the maude then the maude is spunky. If something ebonise the maude then it curtsey the maude. If the queada curtsey the maude then the maude is swollen. If the maude is attired and the maude curtsey the queada then the maude is avenged. The maude is attired.", "logic": "\nCurtsey(queada, maude)\nAttired(queada)\nStave(queada, maude)\nCurtsey(maude, queada)\nSwollen(maude)\nStave(maude, queada)\nEbonise(maude, queada)\nEbonise(maude, queada) -> Attired(queada)\nforall x (Spunky(x) -> Attired(x))\nforall x (Stave(x, maude) -> Spunky(maude))\nforall x (Ebonise(x, maude) -> Curtsey(x, maude))\nCurtsey(queada, maude) -> Swollen(maude)\nAttired(maude) and Curtsey(maude, queada) -> Avenged(maude)\n\nAttired(maude)\n\nStave(queada, maude) and forall x (Stave(x, maude) -> Spunky(maude)) -> therefore Spunky(maude) Spunky(maude) and forall x (Spunky(x) -> Attired(x)) -> therefore Attired(maude)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The elliott mistake the lonna. The elliott is unripened. The elliott glut the lonna. The lonna mistake the elliott. The lonna is mitral. The lonna glut the elliott. The lonna subject the elliott. If the lonna subject the elliott then the elliott is unripened. If something is handy then it is unripened. If something glut the lonna then the lonna is handy. If something subject the lonna then it mistake the lonna. If the elliott mistake the lonna then the lonna is mitral. If the lonna is unripened and the lonna mistake the elliott then the lonna is scarey. The lonna is not unripened.", "logic": "\nMistake(elliott, lonna)\nUnripened(elliott)\nGlut(elliott, lonna)\nMistake(lonna, elliott)\nMitral(lonna)\nGlut(lonna, elliott)\nSubject(lonna, elliott)\nSubject(lonna, elliott) -> Unripened(elliott)\nforall x (Handy(x) -> Unripened(x))\nforall x (Glut(x, lonna) -> Handy(lonna))\nforall x (Subject(x, lonna) -> Mistake(x, lonna))\nMistake(elliott, lonna) -> Mitral(lonna)\nUnripened(lonna) and Mistake(lonna, elliott) -> Scarey(lonna)\n\nnot Unripened(lonna)\n\nGlut(elliott, lonna) and forall x (Glut(x, lonna) -> Handy(lonna)) -> therefore Handy(lonna) Handy(lonna) and forall x (Handy(x) -> Unripened(x)) -> therefore Unripened(lonna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The gordan derange the paula. The gordan is unposed. The gordan bulk the paula. The paula derange the gordan. The paula is mazed. The paula bulk the gordan. The paula opalize the gordan. If the paula opalize the gordan then the gordan is unposed. If something is unrequited then it is unposed. If something bulk the paula then the paula is unrequited. If something opalize the paula then it derange the paula. If the gordan derange the paula then the paula is mazed. If the paula is unposed and the paula derange the gordan then the paula is nescient. The paula is nescient.", "logic": "\nDerange(gordan, paula)\nUnposed(gordan)\nBulk(gordan, paula)\nDerange(paula, gordan)\nMazed(paula)\nBulk(paula, gordan)\nOpalize(paula, gordan)\nOpalize(paula, gordan) -> Unposed(gordan)\nforall x (Unrequited(x) -> Unposed(x))\nforall x (Bulk(x, paula) -> Unrequited(paula))\nforall x (Opalize(x, paula) -> Derange(x, paula))\nDerange(gordan, paula) -> Mazed(paula)\nUnposed(paula) and Derange(paula, gordan) -> Nescient(paula)\n\nNescient(paula)\n\nBulk(gordan, paula) and forall x (Bulk(x, paula) -> Unrequited(paula)) -> therefore Unrequited(paula) Unrequited(paula) and forall x (Unrequited(x) -> Unposed(x)) -> therefore Unposed(paula) Unposed(paula) and Derange(paula, gordan) and Unposed(paula) and Derange(paula, gordan) -> Nescient(paula) -> therefore Nescient(paula)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The feodora contuse the kissee. The feodora is pantheist. The feodora luge the kissee. The kissee contuse the feodora. The kissee is backward. The kissee luge the feodora. The kissee cleave the feodora. If the kissee cleave the feodora then the feodora is pantheist. If something is vixenish then it is pantheist. If something luge the kissee then the kissee is vixenish. If something cleave the kissee then it contuse the kissee. If the feodora contuse the kissee then the kissee is backward. If the kissee is pantheist and the kissee contuse the feodora then the kissee is wingless. The kissee is not wingless.", "logic": "\nContuse(feodora, kissee)\nPantheist(feodora)\nLuge(feodora, kissee)\nContuse(kissee, feodora)\nBackward(kissee)\nLuge(kissee, feodora)\nCleave(kissee, feodora)\nCleave(kissee, feodora) -> Pantheist(feodora)\nforall x (Vixenish(x) -> Pantheist(x))\nforall x (Luge(x, kissee) -> Vixenish(kissee))\nforall x (Cleave(x, kissee) -> Contuse(x, kissee))\nContuse(feodora, kissee) -> Backward(kissee)\nPantheist(kissee) and Contuse(kissee, feodora) -> Wingless(kissee)\n\nnot Wingless(kissee)\n\nLuge(feodora, kissee) and forall x (Luge(x, kissee) -> Vixenish(kissee)) -> therefore Vixenish(kissee) Vixenish(kissee) and forall x (Vixenish(x) -> Pantheist(x)) -> therefore Pantheist(kissee) Pantheist(kissee) and Contuse(kissee, feodora) and Pantheist(kissee) and Contuse(kissee, feodora) -> Wingless(kissee) -> therefore Wingless(kissee)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The ray declutch the waneta. The ray is upset. The ray backbite the waneta. The waneta declutch the ray. The waneta is coolheaded. The waneta backbite the ray. The waneta etch the ray. If the waneta etch the ray then the ray is upset. If something is torulose then it is upset. If something backbite the waneta then the waneta is torulose. If something etch the waneta then it declutch the waneta. If the ray declutch the waneta then the waneta is coolheaded. If the waneta is upset and the waneta declutch the ray then the waneta is sickening. The waneta does not chase the waneta.", "logic": "\nDeclutch(ray, waneta)\nUpset(ray)\nBackbite(ray, waneta)\nDeclutch(waneta, ray)\nCoolheaded(waneta)\nBackbite(waneta, ray)\nEtch(waneta, ray)\nEtch(waneta, ray) -> Upset(ray)\nforall x (Torulose(x) -> Upset(x))\nforall x (Backbite(x, waneta) -> Torulose(waneta))\nforall x (Etch(x, waneta) -> Declutch(x, waneta))\nDeclutch(ray, waneta) -> Coolheaded(waneta)\nUpset(waneta) and Declutch(waneta, ray) -> Sickening(waneta)\n\nnot Declutch(waneta, waneta)\n\nforall x (Etch(x, waneta) -> Declutch(x, waneta)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The wait backspace the domenic. The wait is unselfish. The wait regard the domenic. The domenic backspace the wait. The domenic is antitrust. The domenic regard the wait. The domenic colorcast the wait. If the domenic colorcast the wait then the wait is unselfish. If something is bastard then it is unselfish. If something regard the domenic then the domenic is bastard. If something colorcast the domenic then it backspace the domenic. If the wait backspace the domenic then the domenic is antitrust. If the domenic is unselfish and the domenic backspace the wait then the domenic is fishy. The wait colorcast the domenic.", "logic": "\nBackspace(wait, domenic)\nUnselfish(wait)\nRegard(wait, domenic)\nBackspace(domenic, wait)\nAntitrust(domenic)\nRegard(domenic, wait)\nColorcast(domenic, wait)\nColorcast(domenic, wait) -> Unselfish(wait)\nforall x (Bastard(x) -> Unselfish(x))\nforall x (Regard(x, domenic) -> Bastard(domenic))\nforall x (Colorcast(x, domenic) -> Backspace(x, domenic))\nBackspace(wait, domenic) -> Antitrust(domenic)\nUnselfish(domenic) and Backspace(domenic, wait) -> Fishy(domenic)\n\nColorcast(wait, domenic)\n\nColorcast(wait, domenic) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The carole empty the latisha. The carole is pecuniary. The carole average the latisha. The latisha empty the carole. The latisha is descendant. The latisha average the carole. The latisha uncompress the carole. If the latisha uncompress the carole then the carole is pecuniary. If something is intriguing then it is pecuniary. If something average the latisha then the latisha is intriguing. If something uncompress the latisha then it empty the latisha. If the carole empty the latisha then the latisha is descendant. If the latisha is pecuniary and the latisha empty the carole then the latisha is sublunary. The carole is not sublunary.", "logic": "\nEmpty(carole, latisha)\nPecuniary(carole)\nAverage(carole, latisha)\nEmpty(latisha, carole)\nDescendant(latisha)\nAverage(latisha, carole)\nUncompress(latisha, carole)\nUncompress(latisha, carole) -> Pecuniary(carole)\nforall x (Intriguing(x) -> Pecuniary(x))\nforall x (Average(x, latisha) -> Intriguing(latisha))\nforall x (Uncompress(x, latisha) -> Empty(x, latisha))\nEmpty(carole, latisha) -> Descendant(latisha)\nPecuniary(latisha) and Empty(latisha, carole) -> Sublunary(latisha)\n\nnot Sublunary(carole)\n\nnot Sublunary(carole) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The avrit gall the ernie. The avrit is moronic. The avrit disturb the ernie. The ernie gall the avrit. The ernie is midland. The ernie disturb the avrit. The ernie redden the avrit. If the ernie redden the avrit then the avrit is moronic. If something is tickling then it is moronic. If something disturb the ernie then the ernie is tickling. If something redden the ernie then it gall the ernie. If the avrit gall the ernie then the ernie is midland. If the ernie is moronic and the ernie gall the avrit then the ernie is illiterate. The avrit is tickling.", "logic": "\nGall(avrit, ernie)\nMoronic(avrit)\nDisturb(avrit, ernie)\nGall(ernie, avrit)\nMidland(ernie)\nDisturb(ernie, avrit)\nRedden(ernie, avrit)\nRedden(ernie, avrit) -> Moronic(avrit)\nforall x (Tickling(x) -> Moronic(x))\nforall x (Disturb(x, ernie) -> Tickling(ernie))\nforall x (Redden(x, ernie) -> Gall(x, ernie))\nGall(avrit, ernie) -> Midland(ernie)\nMoronic(ernie) and Gall(ernie, avrit) -> Illiterate(ernie)\n\nTickling(avrit)\n\nTickling(avrit) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The mikey telex the alina. The mikey is immense. The mikey subsidise the alina. The alina telex the mikey. The alina is parthian. The alina subsidise the mikey. The alina fate the mikey. If the alina fate the mikey then the mikey is immense. If something is biogenous then it is immense. If something subsidise the alina then the alina is biogenous. If something fate the alina then it telex the alina. If the mikey telex the alina then the alina is parthian. If the alina is immense and the alina telex the mikey then the alina is roseate. The alina does not see the alina.", "logic": "\nTelex(mikey, alina)\nImmense(mikey)\nSubsidise(mikey, alina)\nTelex(alina, mikey)\nParthian(alina)\nSubsidise(alina, mikey)\nFate(alina, mikey)\nFate(alina, mikey) -> Immense(mikey)\nforall x (Biogenous(x) -> Immense(x))\nforall x (Subsidise(x, alina) -> Biogenous(alina))\nforall x (Fate(x, alina) -> Telex(x, alina))\nTelex(mikey, alina) -> Parthian(alina)\nImmense(alina) and Telex(alina, mikey) -> Roseate(alina)\n\nnot Fate(alina, alina)\n\nnot Fate(alina, alina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The malina reprehend the eugine. The malina is mirky. The malina prepose the eugine. The eugine reprehend the malina. The eugine is burnt. The eugine prepose the malina. The eugine endue the malina. If the eugine endue the malina then the malina is mirky. If something is african then it is mirky. If something prepose the eugine then the eugine is african. If something endue the eugine then it reprehend the eugine. If the malina reprehend the eugine then the eugine is burnt. If the eugine is mirky and the eugine reprehend the malina then the eugine is sulfurous. The eugine is cold.", "logic": "\nReprehend(malina, eugine)\nMirky(malina)\nPrepose(malina, eugine)\nReprehend(eugine, malina)\nBurnt(eugine)\nPrepose(eugine, malina)\nEndue(eugine, malina)\nEndue(eugine, malina) -> Mirky(malina)\nforall x (African(x) -> Mirky(x))\nforall x (Prepose(x, eugine) -> African(eugine))\nforall x (Endue(x, eugine) -> Reprehend(x, eugine))\nReprehend(malina, eugine) -> Burnt(eugine)\nMirky(eugine) and Reprehend(eugine, malina) -> Sulfurous(eugine)\n\nCold(eugine)\n\nCold(eugine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The shirl perturb the ulrick. The shirl is duodecimal. The shirl blitzkrieg the ulrick. The ulrick perturb the shirl. The ulrick is irrelevant. The ulrick blitzkrieg the shirl. The ulrick propagate the shirl. If the ulrick propagate the shirl then the shirl is duodecimal. If something is congestive then it is duodecimal. If something blitzkrieg the ulrick then the ulrick is congestive. If something propagate the ulrick then it perturb the ulrick. If the shirl perturb the ulrick then the ulrick is irrelevant. If the ulrick is duodecimal and the ulrick perturb the shirl then the ulrick is oceanic. The shirl is not irrelevant.", "logic": "\nPerturb(shirl, ulrick)\nDuodecimal(shirl)\nBlitzkrieg(shirl, ulrick)\nPerturb(ulrick, shirl)\nIrrelevant(ulrick)\nBlitzkrieg(ulrick, shirl)\nPropagate(ulrick, shirl)\nPropagate(ulrick, shirl) -> Duodecimal(shirl)\nforall x (Congestive(x) -> Duodecimal(x))\nforall x (Blitzkrieg(x, ulrick) -> Congestive(ulrick))\nforall x (Propagate(x, ulrick) -> Perturb(x, ulrick))\nPerturb(shirl, ulrick) -> Irrelevant(ulrick)\nDuodecimal(ulrick) and Perturb(ulrick, shirl) -> Oceanic(ulrick)\n\nnot Irrelevant(shirl)\n\nnot Irrelevant(shirl) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "The felicity cark the felicio. The felicity is auric. The felicity unitise the felicio. The felicio cark the felicity. The felicio is topical. The felicio unitise the felicity. The felicio tampon the felicity. If the felicio tampon the felicity then the felicity is auric. If something is repellant then it is auric. If something unitise the felicio then the felicio is repellant. If something tampon the felicio then it cark the felicio. If the felicity cark the felicio then the felicio is topical. If the felicio is auric and the felicio cark the felicity then the felicio is semiotic. The felicio unitise the felicio.", "logic": "\nCark(felicity, felicio)\nAuric(felicity)\nUnitise(felicity, felicio)\nCark(felicio, felicity)\nTopical(felicio)\nUnitise(felicio, felicity)\nTampon(felicio, felicity)\nTampon(felicio, felicity) -> Auric(felicity)\nforall x (Repellant(x) -> Auric(x))\nforall x (Unitise(x, felicio) -> Repellant(felicio))\nforall x (Tampon(x, felicio) -> Cark(x, felicio))\nCark(felicity, felicio) -> Topical(felicio)\nAuric(felicio) and Cark(felicio, felicity) -> Semiotic(felicio)\n\nUnitise(felicio, felicio)\n\nUnitise(felicio, felicio) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-428"} {"premises": "Tammara is medial. Rhea is not open. Barnie is hydrated. If something is epicurean and not hydrated then it is medial. If Rhea is unawakened then Rhea is not uniform. Barnie is hydrated.", "logic": "\nMedial(tammara)\nnot Open(rhea)\nHydrated(barnie)\nforall x (Epicurean(x) and not Hydrated(x) -> Medial(x))\nUnawakened(rhea) -> not Uniform(rhea)\n\nHydrated(barnie)\n\ntherefore Hydrated(barnie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-461"} {"premises": "Davin is dread. Ulrika is not yearly. Agace is uncultured. If something is zoic and not uncultured then it is dread. If Ulrika is zambian then Ulrika is not creole. Agace is not uncultured.", "logic": "\nDread(davin)\nnot Yearly(ulrika)\nUncultured(agace)\nforall x (Zoic(x) and not Uncultured(x) -> Dread(x))\nZambian(ulrika) -> not Creole(ulrika)\n\nnot Uncultured(agace)\n\ntherefore Uncultured(agace)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-461"} {"premises": "Arne is plebeian. Regen is not oppositive. Lynnell is algid. If something is venetian and not algid then it is plebeian. If Regen is milanese then Regen is not migrant. Regen is not plebeian.", "logic": "\nPlebeian(arne)\nnot Oppositive(regen)\nAlgid(lynnell)\nforall x (Venetian(x) and not Algid(x) -> Plebeian(x))\nMilanese(regen) -> not Migrant(regen)\n\nnot Plebeian(regen)\n\nforall x (Venetian(x) and not Algid(x) -> Plebeian(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-461"} {"premises": "Gunther is farther. Frazier is not overseas. Arleta is diachronic. If something is harmful and not diachronic then it is farther. If Frazier is avian then Frazier is not vehicular. Arleta is overseas.", "logic": "\nFarther(gunther)\nnot Overseas(frazier)\nDiachronic(arleta)\nforall x (Harmful(x) and not Diachronic(x) -> Farther(x))\nAvian(frazier) -> not Vehicular(frazier)\n\nOverseas(arleta)\n\nOverseas(arleta) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D0-461"} {"premises": "Cody is rapt. Hagen is rapt. Forest is obviating. If someone is enate then they are avaricious. If Cody is rapt then Cody is trigonal. If Cody is amnic and Cody is avaricious then Cody is enate. Nice people are avaricious. If someone is rapt then they are obviating. Cold, amnic people are enate. Forest is obviating.", "logic": "\nRapt(cody)\nRapt(hagen)\nObviating(forest)\nforall x (Enate(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nRapt(cody) -> Trigonal(cody)\nAmnic(cody) and Avaricious(cody) -> Enate(cody)\nforall x (Obviating(x) -> Avaricious(x))\nforall x (Rapt(x) -> Obviating(x))\nforall x (Rapt(x) and Amnic(x) -> Enate(x))\n\nObviating(forest)\n\ntherefore Obviating(forest)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2682"} {"premises": "Lisabeth is dazzling. Sidney is dazzling. Andree is ictic. If someone is ascetic then they are goosy. If Lisabeth is dazzling then Lisabeth is monovalent. If Lisabeth is recent and Lisabeth is goosy then Lisabeth is ascetic. Nice people are goosy. If someone is dazzling then they are ictic. Cold, recent people are ascetic. Andree is not ictic.", "logic": "\nDazzling(lisabeth)\nDazzling(sidney)\nIctic(andree)\nforall x (Ascetic(x) -> Goosy(x))\nDazzling(lisabeth) -> Monovalent(lisabeth)\nRecent(lisabeth) and Goosy(lisabeth) -> Ascetic(lisabeth)\nforall x (Ictic(x) -> Goosy(x))\nforall x (Dazzling(x) -> Ictic(x))\nforall x (Dazzling(x) and Recent(x) -> Ascetic(x))\n\nnot Ictic(andree)\n\ntherefore Ictic(andree)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2682"} {"premises": "Russell is relentless. Pedro is relentless. Mala is bifoliate. If someone is latent then they are willing. If Russell is relentless then Russell is unassigned. If Russell is soundable and Russell is willing then Russell is latent. Nice people are willing. If someone is relentless then they are bifoliate. Cold, soundable people are latent. Mala is not latent.", "logic": "\nRelentless(russell)\nRelentless(pedro)\nBifoliate(mala)\nforall x (Latent(x) -> Willing(x))\nRelentless(russell) -> Unassigned(russell)\nSoundable(russell) and Willing(russell) -> Latent(russell)\nforall x (Bifoliate(x) -> Willing(x))\nforall x (Relentless(x) -> Bifoliate(x))\nforall x (Relentless(x) and Soundable(x) -> Latent(x))\n\nnot Latent(mala)\n\nforall x (Relentless(x) and Soundable(x) -> Latent(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2682"} {"premises": "Jerry is jewish. Katharine is jewish. Dionis is swift. If someone is vatic then they are dateable. If Jerry is jewish then Jerry is frontal. If Jerry is wretched and Jerry is dateable then Jerry is vatic. Nice people are dateable. If someone is jewish then they are swift. Cold, wretched people are vatic. Jerry is wretched.", "logic": "\nJewish(jerry)\nJewish(katharine)\nSwift(dionis)\nforall x (Vatic(x) -> Dateable(x))\nJewish(jerry) -> Frontal(jerry)\nWretched(jerry) and Dateable(jerry) -> Vatic(jerry)\nforall x (Swift(x) -> Dateable(x))\nforall x (Jewish(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Jewish(x) and Wretched(x) -> Vatic(x))\n\nWretched(jerry)\n\nWretched(jerry) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-2682"} {"premises": "The kat conjecture the brooks. The fabio divine the brooks. The brooks is unionized. If something conjecture the brooks and it is unionized then it is throwaway. If something is unionized then it conjecture the kat. If the kat conjecture the fabio then the kat divine the fabio. If something divine the brooks then the brooks conjecture the fabio. If the brooks is larboard then the brooks divine the kat. If the brooks is throwaway then the brooks consult the fabio. If something conjecture the fabio and it is unionized then the fabio is unionized. If something divine the kat then it consult the fabio. The brooks is unionized.", "logic": "\nConjecture(kat, brooks)\nDivine(fabio, brooks)\nUnionized(brooks)\nforall x (Conjecture(x, brooks) and Unionized(x) -> Throwaway(x))\nforall x (Unionized(x) -> Conjecture(x, kat))\nConjecture(kat, fabio) -> Divine(kat, fabio)\nforall x (Divine(x, brooks) -> Conjecture(brooks, fabio))\nLarboard(brooks) -> Divine(brooks, kat)\nThrowaway(brooks) -> Consult(brooks, fabio)\nforall x (Conjecture(x, fabio) and Unionized(x) -> Unionized(fabio))\nforall x (Divine(x, kat) -> Consult(x, fabio))\n\nUnionized(brooks)\n\ntherefore Unionized(brooks)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The gretta veer the kory. The matthieu militarise the kory. The kory is submissive. If something veer the kory and it is submissive then it is senecan. If something is submissive then it veer the gretta. If the gretta veer the matthieu then the gretta militarise the matthieu. If something militarise the kory then the kory veer the matthieu. If the kory is rackety then the kory militarise the gretta. If the kory is senecan then the kory clobber the matthieu. If something veer the matthieu and it is submissive then the matthieu is submissive. If something militarise the gretta then it clobber the matthieu. The matthieu does not chase the kory.", "logic": "\nVeer(gretta, kory)\nMilitarise(matthieu, kory)\nSubmissive(kory)\nforall x (Veer(x, kory) and Submissive(x) -> Senecan(x))\nforall x (Submissive(x) -> Veer(x, gretta))\nVeer(gretta, matthieu) -> Militarise(gretta, matthieu)\nforall x (Militarise(x, kory) -> Veer(kory, matthieu))\nRackety(kory) -> Militarise(kory, gretta)\nSenecan(kory) -> Clobber(kory, matthieu)\nforall x (Veer(x, matthieu) and Submissive(x) -> Submissive(matthieu))\nforall x (Militarise(x, gretta) -> Clobber(x, matthieu))\n\nnot Militarise(matthieu, kory)\n\ntherefore Militarise(matthieu, kory)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The sherye lucubrate the carin. The karrie libel the carin. The carin is prandial. If something lucubrate the carin and it is prandial then it is neuroglial. If something is prandial then it lucubrate the sherye. If the sherye lucubrate the karrie then the sherye libel the karrie. If something libel the carin then the carin lucubrate the karrie. If the carin is unstinted then the carin libel the sherye. If the carin is neuroglial then the carin binge the karrie. If something lucubrate the karrie and it is prandial then the karrie is prandial. If something libel the sherye then it binge the karrie. The carin lucubrate the sherye.", "logic": "\nLucubrate(sherye, carin)\nLibel(karrie, carin)\nPrandial(carin)\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, carin) and Prandial(x) -> Neuroglial(x))\nforall x (Prandial(x) -> Lucubrate(x, sherye))\nLucubrate(sherye, karrie) -> Libel(sherye, karrie)\nforall x (Libel(x, carin) -> Lucubrate(carin, karrie))\nUnstinted(carin) -> Libel(carin, sherye)\nNeuroglial(carin) -> Binge(carin, karrie)\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, karrie) and Prandial(x) -> Prandial(karrie))\nforall x (Libel(x, sherye) -> Binge(x, karrie))\n\nLucubrate(carin, sherye)\n\nPrandial(carin) and forall x (Prandial(x) -> Lucubrate(x, sherye)) -> therefore Lucubrate(carin, sherye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The gasper handcolor the corie. The bertie frenchify the corie. The corie is garlicky. If something handcolor the corie and it is garlicky then it is delectable. If something is garlicky then it handcolor the gasper. If the gasper handcolor the bertie then the gasper frenchify the bertie. If something frenchify the corie then the corie handcolor the bertie. If the corie is basilar then the corie frenchify the gasper. If the corie is delectable then the corie hurdle the bertie. If something handcolor the bertie and it is garlicky then the bertie is garlicky. If something frenchify the gasper then it hurdle the bertie. The corie does not need the gasper.", "logic": "\nHandcolor(gasper, corie)\nFrenchify(bertie, corie)\nGarlicky(corie)\nforall x (Handcolor(x, corie) and Garlicky(x) -> Delectable(x))\nforall x (Garlicky(x) -> Handcolor(x, gasper))\nHandcolor(gasper, bertie) -> Frenchify(gasper, bertie)\nforall x (Frenchify(x, corie) -> Handcolor(corie, bertie))\nBasilar(corie) -> Frenchify(corie, gasper)\nDelectable(corie) -> Hurdle(corie, bertie)\nforall x (Handcolor(x, bertie) and Garlicky(x) -> Garlicky(bertie))\nforall x (Frenchify(x, gasper) -> Hurdle(x, bertie))\n\nnot Handcolor(corie, gasper)\n\nGarlicky(corie) and forall x (Garlicky(x) -> Handcolor(x, gasper)) -> therefore Handcolor(corie, gasper)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The jessey flense the cindi. The obadiah bulldog the cindi. The cindi is highland. If something flense the cindi and it is highland then it is katabolic. If something is highland then it flense the jessey. If the jessey flense the obadiah then the jessey bulldog the obadiah. If something bulldog the cindi then the cindi flense the obadiah. If the cindi is quizzical then the cindi bulldog the jessey. If the cindi is katabolic then the cindi patch the obadiah. If something flense the obadiah and it is highland then the obadiah is highland. If something bulldog the jessey then it patch the obadiah. The obadiah is highland.", "logic": "\nFlense(jessey, cindi)\nBulldog(obadiah, cindi)\nHighland(cindi)\nforall x (Flense(x, cindi) and Highland(x) -> Katabolic(x))\nforall x (Highland(x) -> Flense(x, jessey))\nFlense(jessey, obadiah) -> Bulldog(jessey, obadiah)\nforall x (Bulldog(x, cindi) -> Flense(cindi, obadiah))\nQuizzical(cindi) -> Bulldog(cindi, jessey)\nKatabolic(cindi) -> Patch(cindi, obadiah)\nforall x (Flense(x, obadiah) and Highland(x) -> Highland(obadiah))\nforall x (Bulldog(x, jessey) -> Patch(x, obadiah))\n\nHighland(obadiah)\n\nBulldog(obadiah, cindi) and forall x (Bulldog(x, cindi) -> Flense(cindi, obadiah)) -> therefore Flense(cindi, obadiah) Flense(cindi, obadiah) and Highland(cindi) and forall x (Flense(x, obadiah) and Highland(x) -> Highland(obadiah)) -> therefore Highland(obadiah)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The phyllis divide the candida. The evania nigrify the candida. The candida is recurvate. If something divide the candida and it is recurvate then it is vicarious. If something is recurvate then it divide the phyllis. If the phyllis divide the evania then the phyllis nigrify the evania. If something nigrify the candida then the candida divide the evania. If the candida is bedraggled then the candida nigrify the phyllis. If the candida is vicarious then the candida ruddle the evania. If something divide the evania and it is recurvate then the evania is recurvate. If something nigrify the phyllis then it ruddle the evania. The evania is not recurvate.", "logic": "\nDivide(phyllis, candida)\nNigrify(evania, candida)\nRecurvate(candida)\nforall x (Divide(x, candida) and Recurvate(x) -> Vicarious(x))\nforall x (Recurvate(x) -> Divide(x, phyllis))\nDivide(phyllis, evania) -> Nigrify(phyllis, evania)\nforall x (Nigrify(x, candida) -> Divide(candida, evania))\nBedraggled(candida) -> Nigrify(candida, phyllis)\nVicarious(candida) -> Ruddle(candida, evania)\nforall x (Divide(x, evania) and Recurvate(x) -> Recurvate(evania))\nforall x (Nigrify(x, phyllis) -> Ruddle(x, evania))\n\nnot Recurvate(evania)\n\nNigrify(evania, candida) and forall x (Nigrify(x, candida) -> Divide(candida, evania)) -> therefore Divide(candida, evania) Divide(candida, evania) and Recurvate(candida) and forall x (Divide(x, evania) and Recurvate(x) -> Recurvate(evania)) -> therefore Recurvate(evania)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The jenn arch the toinette. The rora emcee the toinette. The toinette is hebdomadal. If something arch the toinette and it is hebdomadal then it is scrubby. If something is hebdomadal then it arch the jenn. If the jenn arch the rora then the jenn emcee the rora. If something emcee the toinette then the toinette arch the rora. If the toinette is indurate then the toinette emcee the jenn. If the toinette is scrubby then the toinette surveil the rora. If something arch the rora and it is hebdomadal then the rora is hebdomadal. If something emcee the jenn then it surveil the rora. The rora arch the jenn.", "logic": "\nArch(jenn, toinette)\nEmcee(rora, toinette)\nHebdomadal(toinette)\nforall x (Arch(x, toinette) and Hebdomadal(x) -> Scrubby(x))\nforall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Arch(x, jenn))\nArch(jenn, rora) -> Emcee(jenn, rora)\nforall x (Emcee(x, toinette) -> Arch(toinette, rora))\nIndurate(toinette) -> Emcee(toinette, jenn)\nScrubby(toinette) -> Surveil(toinette, rora)\nforall x (Arch(x, rora) and Hebdomadal(x) -> Hebdomadal(rora))\nforall x (Emcee(x, jenn) -> Surveil(x, rora))\n\nArch(rora, jenn)\n\nEmcee(rora, toinette) and forall x (Emcee(x, toinette) -> Arch(toinette, rora)) -> therefore Arch(toinette, rora) Arch(toinette, rora) and Hebdomadal(toinette) and forall x (Arch(x, rora) and Hebdomadal(x) -> Hebdomadal(rora)) -> therefore Hebdomadal(rora) Hebdomadal(rora) and forall x (Hebdomadal(x) -> Arch(x, jenn)) -> therefore Arch(rora, jenn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The danella metricize the becki. The bentley desalinate the becki. The becki is backhand. If something metricize the becki and it is backhand then it is reassuring. If something is backhand then it metricize the danella. If the danella metricize the bentley then the danella desalinate the bentley. If something desalinate the becki then the becki metricize the bentley. If the becki is dipped then the becki desalinate the danella. If the becki is reassuring then the becki improvise the bentley. If something metricize the bentley and it is backhand then the bentley is backhand. If something desalinate the danella then it improvise the bentley. The bentley does not need the danella.", "logic": "\nMetricize(danella, becki)\nDesalinate(bentley, becki)\nBackhand(becki)\nforall x (Metricize(x, becki) and Backhand(x) -> Reassuring(x))\nforall x (Backhand(x) -> Metricize(x, danella))\nMetricize(danella, bentley) -> Desalinate(danella, bentley)\nforall x (Desalinate(x, becki) -> Metricize(becki, bentley))\nDipped(becki) -> Desalinate(becki, danella)\nReassuring(becki) -> Improvise(becki, bentley)\nforall x (Metricize(x, bentley) and Backhand(x) -> Backhand(bentley))\nforall x (Desalinate(x, danella) -> Improvise(x, bentley))\n\nnot Metricize(bentley, danella)\n\nDesalinate(bentley, becki) and forall x (Desalinate(x, becki) -> Metricize(becki, bentley)) -> therefore Metricize(becki, bentley) Metricize(becki, bentley) and Backhand(becki) and forall x (Metricize(x, bentley) and Backhand(x) -> Backhand(bentley)) -> therefore Backhand(bentley) Backhand(bentley) and forall x (Backhand(x) -> Metricize(x, danella)) -> therefore Metricize(bentley, danella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The katuscha transact the ebony. The clarey propel the ebony. The ebony is brachiopod. If something transact the ebony and it is brachiopod then it is bosomed. If something is brachiopod then it transact the katuscha. If the katuscha transact the clarey then the katuscha propel the clarey. If something propel the ebony then the ebony transact the clarey. If the ebony is snooty then the ebony propel the katuscha. If the ebony is bosomed then the ebony sightsing the clarey. If something transact the clarey and it is brachiopod then the clarey is brachiopod. If something propel the katuscha then it sightsing the clarey. The ebony does not visit the clarey.", "logic": "\nTransact(katuscha, ebony)\nPropel(clarey, ebony)\nBrachiopod(ebony)\nforall x (Transact(x, ebony) and Brachiopod(x) -> Bosomed(x))\nforall x (Brachiopod(x) -> Transact(x, katuscha))\nTransact(katuscha, clarey) -> Propel(katuscha, clarey)\nforall x (Propel(x, ebony) -> Transact(ebony, clarey))\nSnooty(ebony) -> Propel(ebony, katuscha)\nBosomed(ebony) -> Sightsing(ebony, clarey)\nforall x (Transact(x, clarey) and Brachiopod(x) -> Brachiopod(clarey))\nforall x (Propel(x, katuscha) -> Sightsing(x, clarey))\n\nnot Sightsing(ebony, clarey)\n\nBosomed(ebony) -> Sightsing(ebony, clarey) <- forall x (Transact(x, ebony) and Brachiopod(x) -> Bosomed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The nalani incinerate the daryn. The tiffie outspan the daryn. The daryn is soleless. If something incinerate the daryn and it is soleless then it is ownerless. If something is soleless then it incinerate the nalani. If the nalani incinerate the tiffie then the nalani outspan the tiffie. If something outspan the daryn then the daryn incinerate the tiffie. If the daryn is untended then the daryn outspan the nalani. If the daryn is ownerless then the daryn blench the tiffie. If something incinerate the tiffie and it is soleless then the tiffie is soleless. If something outspan the nalani then it blench the tiffie. The daryn outspan the nalani.", "logic": "\nIncinerate(nalani, daryn)\nOutspan(tiffie, daryn)\nSoleless(daryn)\nforall x (Incinerate(x, daryn) and Soleless(x) -> Ownerless(x))\nforall x (Soleless(x) -> Incinerate(x, nalani))\nIncinerate(nalani, tiffie) -> Outspan(nalani, tiffie)\nforall x (Outspan(x, daryn) -> Incinerate(daryn, tiffie))\nUntended(daryn) -> Outspan(daryn, nalani)\nOwnerless(daryn) -> Blench(daryn, tiffie)\nforall x (Incinerate(x, tiffie) and Soleless(x) -> Soleless(tiffie))\nforall x (Outspan(x, nalani) -> Blench(x, tiffie))\n\nOutspan(daryn, nalani)\n\nUntended(daryn) -> Outspan(daryn, nalani) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The pamella debunk the anjela. The betteanne disengage the anjela. The anjela is sourish. If something debunk the anjela and it is sourish then it is puny. If something is sourish then it debunk the pamella. If the pamella debunk the betteanne then the pamella disengage the betteanne. If something disengage the anjela then the anjela debunk the betteanne. If the anjela is foliaceous then the anjela disengage the pamella. If the anjela is puny then the anjela azure the betteanne. If something debunk the betteanne and it is sourish then the betteanne is sourish. If something disengage the pamella then it azure the betteanne. The betteanne is not puny.", "logic": "\nDebunk(pamella, anjela)\nDisengage(betteanne, anjela)\nSourish(anjela)\nforall x (Debunk(x, anjela) and Sourish(x) -> Puny(x))\nforall x (Sourish(x) -> Debunk(x, pamella))\nDebunk(pamella, betteanne) -> Disengage(pamella, betteanne)\nforall x (Disengage(x, anjela) -> Debunk(anjela, betteanne))\nFoliaceous(anjela) -> Disengage(anjela, pamella)\nPuny(anjela) -> Azure(anjela, betteanne)\nforall x (Debunk(x, betteanne) and Sourish(x) -> Sourish(betteanne))\nforall x (Disengage(x, pamella) -> Azure(x, betteanne))\n\nnot Puny(betteanne)\n\nforall x (Debunk(x, anjela) and Sourish(x) -> Puny(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The caritta focus the annetta. The gabi jeopardise the annetta. The annetta is isotropic. If something focus the annetta and it is isotropic then it is marsupial. If something is isotropic then it focus the caritta. If the caritta focus the gabi then the caritta jeopardise the gabi. If something jeopardise the annetta then the annetta focus the gabi. If the annetta is inflamed then the annetta jeopardise the caritta. If the annetta is marsupial then the annetta invoke the gabi. If something focus the gabi and it is isotropic then the gabi is isotropic. If something jeopardise the caritta then it invoke the gabi. The gabi invoke the gabi.", "logic": "\nFocus(caritta, annetta)\nJeopardise(gabi, annetta)\nIsotropic(annetta)\nforall x (Focus(x, annetta) and Isotropic(x) -> Marsupial(x))\nforall x (Isotropic(x) -> Focus(x, caritta))\nFocus(caritta, gabi) -> Jeopardise(caritta, gabi)\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, annetta) -> Focus(annetta, gabi))\nInflamed(annetta) -> Jeopardise(annetta, caritta)\nMarsupial(annetta) -> Invoke(annetta, gabi)\nforall x (Focus(x, gabi) and Isotropic(x) -> Isotropic(gabi))\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, caritta) -> Invoke(x, gabi))\n\nInvoke(gabi, gabi)\n\nforall x (Jeopardise(x, caritta) -> Invoke(x, gabi)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The pryce mirror the morissa. The ronalda respond the morissa. The morissa is burlesque. If something mirror the morissa and it is burlesque then it is athenian. If something is burlesque then it mirror the pryce. If the pryce mirror the ronalda then the pryce respond the ronalda. If something respond the morissa then the morissa mirror the ronalda. If the morissa is athirst then the morissa respond the pryce. If the morissa is athenian then the morissa protrude the ronalda. If something mirror the ronalda and it is burlesque then the ronalda is burlesque. If something respond the pryce then it protrude the ronalda. The pryce does not chase the pryce.", "logic": "\nMirror(pryce, morissa)\nRespond(ronalda, morissa)\nBurlesque(morissa)\nforall x (Mirror(x, morissa) and Burlesque(x) -> Athenian(x))\nforall x (Burlesque(x) -> Mirror(x, pryce))\nMirror(pryce, ronalda) -> Respond(pryce, ronalda)\nforall x (Respond(x, morissa) -> Mirror(morissa, ronalda))\nAthirst(morissa) -> Respond(morissa, pryce)\nAthenian(morissa) -> Protrude(morissa, ronalda)\nforall x (Mirror(x, ronalda) and Burlesque(x) -> Burlesque(ronalda))\nforall x (Respond(x, pryce) -> Protrude(x, ronalda))\n\nnot Respond(pryce, pryce)\n\nnot Respond(pryce, pryce) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The bertram equalise the marni. The julianne hoodoo the marni. The marni is anginal. If something equalise the marni and it is anginal then it is compelling. If something is anginal then it equalise the bertram. If the bertram equalise the julianne then the bertram hoodoo the julianne. If something hoodoo the marni then the marni equalise the julianne. If the marni is wolfish then the marni hoodoo the bertram. If the marni is compelling then the marni oppugn the julianne. If something equalise the julianne and it is anginal then the julianne is anginal. If something hoodoo the bertram then it oppugn the julianne. The marni is cold.", "logic": "\nEqualise(bertram, marni)\nHoodoo(julianne, marni)\nAnginal(marni)\nforall x (Equalise(x, marni) and Anginal(x) -> Compelling(x))\nforall x (Anginal(x) -> Equalise(x, bertram))\nEqualise(bertram, julianne) -> Hoodoo(bertram, julianne)\nforall x (Hoodoo(x, marni) -> Equalise(marni, julianne))\nWolfish(marni) -> Hoodoo(marni, bertram)\nCompelling(marni) -> Oppugn(marni, julianne)\nforall x (Equalise(x, julianne) and Anginal(x) -> Anginal(julianne))\nforall x (Hoodoo(x, bertram) -> Oppugn(x, julianne))\n\nCold(marni)\n\nCold(marni) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The aggy command the chelsie. The pietro dismount the chelsie. The chelsie is locomotive. If something command the chelsie and it is locomotive then it is jawed. If something is locomotive then it command the aggy. If the aggy command the pietro then the aggy dismount the pietro. If something dismount the chelsie then the chelsie command the pietro. If the chelsie is agnate then the chelsie dismount the aggy. If the chelsie is jawed then the chelsie decipher the pietro. If something command the pietro and it is locomotive then the pietro is locomotive. If something dismount the aggy then it decipher the pietro. The aggy is not locomotive.", "logic": "\nCommand(aggy, chelsie)\nDismount(pietro, chelsie)\nLocomotive(chelsie)\nforall x (Command(x, chelsie) and Locomotive(x) -> Jawed(x))\nforall x (Locomotive(x) -> Command(x, aggy))\nCommand(aggy, pietro) -> Dismount(aggy, pietro)\nforall x (Dismount(x, chelsie) -> Command(chelsie, pietro))\nAgnate(chelsie) -> Dismount(chelsie, aggy)\nJawed(chelsie) -> Decipher(chelsie, pietro)\nforall x (Command(x, pietro) and Locomotive(x) -> Locomotive(pietro))\nforall x (Dismount(x, aggy) -> Decipher(x, pietro))\n\nnot Locomotive(aggy)\n\nnot Locomotive(aggy) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "The whittaker pedicure the deeann. The dougie intermit the deeann. The deeann is unreliable. If something pedicure the deeann and it is unreliable then it is coagulated. If something is unreliable then it pedicure the whittaker. If the whittaker pedicure the dougie then the whittaker intermit the dougie. If something intermit the deeann then the deeann pedicure the dougie. If the deeann is heavenward then the deeann intermit the whittaker. If the deeann is coagulated then the deeann handle the dougie. If something pedicure the dougie and it is unreliable then the dougie is unreliable. If something intermit the whittaker then it handle the dougie. The dougie handle the deeann.", "logic": "\nPedicure(whittaker, deeann)\nIntermit(dougie, deeann)\nUnreliable(deeann)\nforall x (Pedicure(x, deeann) and Unreliable(x) -> Coagulated(x))\nforall x (Unreliable(x) -> Pedicure(x, whittaker))\nPedicure(whittaker, dougie) -> Intermit(whittaker, dougie)\nforall x (Intermit(x, deeann) -> Pedicure(deeann, dougie))\nHeavenward(deeann) -> Intermit(deeann, whittaker)\nCoagulated(deeann) -> Handle(deeann, dougie)\nforall x (Pedicure(x, dougie) and Unreliable(x) -> Unreliable(dougie))\nforall x (Intermit(x, whittaker) -> Handle(x, dougie))\n\nHandle(dougie, deeann)\n\nHandle(dougie, deeann) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-50"} {"premises": "Ugo is departed. Ugo is arminian. Ugo is dolourous. Nice, dolourous things are unclogged. Red, botched things are jordanian. Round, jordanian things are occipital. If something is unclogged then it is jordanian. All dolourous, jordanian things are botched. If Ugo is botched then Ugo is arminian. All unclogged, arminian things are botched. If Ugo is dolourous then Ugo is unclogged. Ugo is arminian.", "logic": "\nDeparted(ugo)\nArminian(ugo)\nDolourous(ugo)\nforall x (Jordanian(x) and Dolourous(x) -> Unclogged(x))\nforall x (Arminian(x) and Botched(x) -> Jordanian(x))\nforall x (Botched(x) and Jordanian(x) -> Occipital(x))\nforall x (Unclogged(x) -> Jordanian(x))\nforall x (Dolourous(x) and Jordanian(x) -> Botched(x))\nBotched(ugo) -> Arminian(ugo)\nforall x (Unclogged(x) and Arminian(x) -> Botched(x))\nDolourous(ugo) -> Unclogged(ugo)\n\nArminian(ugo)\n\ntherefore Arminian(ugo)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Parry is deferent. Parry is ropy. Parry is supportive. Nice, supportive things are hypodermic. Red, humbled things are mythical. Round, mythical things are unseeable. If something is hypodermic then it is mythical. All supportive, mythical things are humbled. If Parry is humbled then Parry is ropy. All hypodermic, ropy things are humbled. If Parry is supportive then Parry is hypodermic. Parry is not deferent.", "logic": "\nDeferent(parry)\nRopy(parry)\nSupportive(parry)\nforall x (Mythical(x) and Supportive(x) -> Hypodermic(x))\nforall x (Ropy(x) and Humbled(x) -> Mythical(x))\nforall x (Humbled(x) and Mythical(x) -> Unseeable(x))\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) -> Mythical(x))\nforall x (Supportive(x) and Mythical(x) -> Humbled(x))\nHumbled(parry) -> Ropy(parry)\nforall x (Hypodermic(x) and Ropy(x) -> Humbled(x))\nSupportive(parry) -> Hypodermic(parry)\n\nnot Deferent(parry)\n\ntherefore Deferent(parry)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Dina is chthonic. Dina is sparkling. Dina is undersized. Nice, undersized things are bighearted. Red, kosher things are spiny. Round, spiny things are amerind. If something is bighearted then it is spiny. All undersized, spiny things are kosher. If Dina is kosher then Dina is sparkling. All bighearted, sparkling things are kosher. If Dina is undersized then Dina is bighearted. Dina is bighearted.", "logic": "\nChthonic(dina)\nSparkling(dina)\nUndersized(dina)\nforall x (Spiny(x) and Undersized(x) -> Bighearted(x))\nforall x (Sparkling(x) and Kosher(x) -> Spiny(x))\nforall x (Kosher(x) and Spiny(x) -> Amerind(x))\nforall x (Bighearted(x) -> Spiny(x))\nforall x (Undersized(x) and Spiny(x) -> Kosher(x))\nKosher(dina) -> Sparkling(dina)\nforall x (Bighearted(x) and Sparkling(x) -> Kosher(x))\nUndersized(dina) -> Bighearted(dina)\n\nBighearted(dina)\n\nUndersized(dina) and Undersized(dina) -> Bighearted(dina) -> therefore Bighearted(dina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Slim is magic. Slim is moire. Slim is libyan. Nice, libyan things are plenteous. Red, precocial things are phlegmatic. Round, phlegmatic things are passing. If something is plenteous then it is phlegmatic. All libyan, phlegmatic things are precocial. If Slim is precocial then Slim is moire. All plenteous, moire things are precocial. If Slim is libyan then Slim is plenteous. Slim is not plenteous.", "logic": "\nMagic(slim)\nMoire(slim)\nLibyan(slim)\nforall x (Phlegmatic(x) and Libyan(x) -> Plenteous(x))\nforall x (Moire(x) and Precocial(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\nforall x (Precocial(x) and Phlegmatic(x) -> Passing(x))\nforall x (Plenteous(x) -> Phlegmatic(x))\nforall x (Libyan(x) and Phlegmatic(x) -> Precocial(x))\nPrecocial(slim) -> Moire(slim)\nforall x (Plenteous(x) and Moire(x) -> Precocial(x))\nLibyan(slim) -> Plenteous(slim)\n\nnot Plenteous(slim)\n\nLibyan(slim) and Libyan(slim) -> Plenteous(slim) -> therefore Plenteous(slim)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Glyn is abstracted. Glyn is blind. Glyn is fewest. Nice, fewest things are adonic. Red, saturated things are alveolate. Round, alveolate things are comal. If something is adonic then it is alveolate. All fewest, alveolate things are saturated. If Glyn is saturated then Glyn is blind. All adonic, blind things are saturated. If Glyn is fewest then Glyn is adonic. Glyn is saturated.", "logic": "\nAbstracted(glyn)\nBlind(glyn)\nFewest(glyn)\nforall x (Alveolate(x) and Fewest(x) -> Adonic(x))\nforall x (Blind(x) and Saturated(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Saturated(x) and Alveolate(x) -> Comal(x))\nforall x (Adonic(x) -> Alveolate(x))\nforall x (Fewest(x) and Alveolate(x) -> Saturated(x))\nSaturated(glyn) -> Blind(glyn)\nforall x (Adonic(x) and Blind(x) -> Saturated(x))\nFewest(glyn) -> Adonic(glyn)\n\nSaturated(glyn)\n\nFewest(glyn) and Fewest(glyn) -> Adonic(glyn) -> therefore Adonic(glyn) Adonic(glyn) and Blind(glyn) and forall x (Adonic(x) and Blind(x) -> Saturated(x)) -> therefore Saturated(glyn)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Tally is bobtail. Tally is grassroots. Tally is nosohusial. Nice, nosohusial things are moving. Red, equivalent things are pyrrhic. Round, pyrrhic things are reassured. If something is moving then it is pyrrhic. All nosohusial, pyrrhic things are equivalent. If Tally is equivalent then Tally is grassroots. All moving, grassroots things are equivalent. If Tally is nosohusial then Tally is moving. Tally is not equivalent.", "logic": "\nBobtail(tally)\nGrassroots(tally)\nNosohusial(tally)\nforall x (Pyrrhic(x) and Nosohusial(x) -> Moving(x))\nforall x (Grassroots(x) and Equivalent(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nforall x (Equivalent(x) and Pyrrhic(x) -> Reassured(x))\nforall x (Moving(x) -> Pyrrhic(x))\nforall x (Nosohusial(x) and Pyrrhic(x) -> Equivalent(x))\nEquivalent(tally) -> Grassroots(tally)\nforall x (Moving(x) and Grassroots(x) -> Equivalent(x))\nNosohusial(tally) -> Moving(tally)\n\nnot Equivalent(tally)\n\nNosohusial(tally) and Nosohusial(tally) -> Moving(tally) -> therefore Moving(tally) Moving(tally) and Grassroots(tally) and forall x (Moving(x) and Grassroots(x) -> Equivalent(x)) -> therefore Equivalent(tally)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Theodore is affixal. Theodore is rustling. Theodore is rotten. Nice, rotten things are ambivalent. Red, repellant things are populous. Round, populous things are unbiassed. If something is ambivalent then it is populous. All rotten, populous things are repellant. If Theodore is repellant then Theodore is rustling. All ambivalent, rustling things are repellant. If Theodore is rotten then Theodore is ambivalent. Theodore is unbiassed.", "logic": "\nAffixal(theodore)\nRustling(theodore)\nRotten(theodore)\nforall x (Populous(x) and Rotten(x) -> Ambivalent(x))\nforall x (Rustling(x) and Repellant(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Repellant(x) and Populous(x) -> Unbiassed(x))\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Populous(x))\nforall x (Rotten(x) and Populous(x) -> Repellant(x))\nRepellant(theodore) -> Rustling(theodore)\nforall x (Ambivalent(x) and Rustling(x) -> Repellant(x))\nRotten(theodore) -> Ambivalent(theodore)\n\nUnbiassed(theodore)\n\nRotten(theodore) and Rotten(theodore) -> Ambivalent(theodore) -> therefore Ambivalent(theodore) Ambivalent(theodore) and Rustling(theodore) and forall x (Ambivalent(x) and Rustling(x) -> Repellant(x)) -> therefore Repellant(theodore) Rotten(theodore) and Rotten(theodore) -> Ambivalent(theodore) -> therefore Ambivalent(theodore) Ambivalent(theodore) and forall x (Ambivalent(x) -> Populous(x)) -> therefore Populous(theodore) Repellant(theodore) and Populous(theodore) and forall x (Repellant(x) and Populous(x) -> Unbiassed(x)) -> therefore Unbiassed(theodore)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Sidonnie is potable. Sidonnie is treelike. Sidonnie is puberulent. Nice, puberulent things are spumy. Red, unrequited things are mysophobic. Round, mysophobic things are aerobic. If something is spumy then it is mysophobic. All puberulent, mysophobic things are unrequited. If Sidonnie is unrequited then Sidonnie is treelike. All spumy, treelike things are unrequited. If Sidonnie is puberulent then Sidonnie is spumy. Sidonnie is not aerobic.", "logic": "\nPotable(sidonnie)\nTreelike(sidonnie)\nPuberulent(sidonnie)\nforall x (Mysophobic(x) and Puberulent(x) -> Spumy(x))\nforall x (Treelike(x) and Unrequited(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Unrequited(x) and Mysophobic(x) -> Aerobic(x))\nforall x (Spumy(x) -> Mysophobic(x))\nforall x (Puberulent(x) and Mysophobic(x) -> Unrequited(x))\nUnrequited(sidonnie) -> Treelike(sidonnie)\nforall x (Spumy(x) and Treelike(x) -> Unrequited(x))\nPuberulent(sidonnie) -> Spumy(sidonnie)\n\nnot Aerobic(sidonnie)\n\nPuberulent(sidonnie) and Puberulent(sidonnie) -> Spumy(sidonnie) -> therefore Spumy(sidonnie) Spumy(sidonnie) and Treelike(sidonnie) and forall x (Spumy(x) and Treelike(x) -> Unrequited(x)) -> therefore Unrequited(sidonnie) Puberulent(sidonnie) and Puberulent(sidonnie) -> Spumy(sidonnie) -> therefore Spumy(sidonnie) Spumy(sidonnie) and forall x (Spumy(x) -> Mysophobic(x)) -> therefore Mysophobic(sidonnie) Unrequited(sidonnie) and Mysophobic(sidonnie) and forall x (Unrequited(x) and Mysophobic(x) -> Aerobic(x)) -> therefore Aerobic(sidonnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-713"} {"premises": "Thane is falconine. All incisive people are hypoactive. All falconine people are incisive. All hypoactive people are snowbound. Thane is falconine.", "logic": "\nFalconine(thane)\nforall x (Incisive(x) -> Hypoactive(x))\nforall x (Falconine(x) -> Incisive(x))\nforall x (Hypoactive(x) -> Snowbound(x))\n\nFalconine(thane)\n\ntherefore Falconine(thane)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Merrielle is tasselled. All cockamamie people are reflected. All tasselled people are cockamamie. All reflected people are bespoke. Merrielle is not tasselled.", "logic": "\nTasselled(merrielle)\nforall x (Cockamamie(x) -> Reflected(x))\nforall x (Tasselled(x) -> Cockamamie(x))\nforall x (Reflected(x) -> Bespoke(x))\n\nnot Tasselled(merrielle)\n\ntherefore Tasselled(merrielle)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Xylina is erratic. All dumfounded people are undrained. All erratic people are dumfounded. All undrained people are falciform. Xylina is dumfounded.", "logic": "\nErratic(xylina)\nforall x (Dumfounded(x) -> Undrained(x))\nforall x (Erratic(x) -> Dumfounded(x))\nforall x (Undrained(x) -> Falciform(x))\n\nDumfounded(xylina)\n\nErratic(xylina) and forall x (Erratic(x) -> Dumfounded(x)) -> therefore Dumfounded(xylina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Worden is freehand. All midmost people are bigger. All freehand people are midmost. All bigger people are viviparous. Worden is not midmost.", "logic": "\nFreehand(worden)\nforall x (Midmost(x) -> Bigger(x))\nforall x (Freehand(x) -> Midmost(x))\nforall x (Bigger(x) -> Viviparous(x))\n\nnot Midmost(worden)\n\nFreehand(worden) and forall x (Freehand(x) -> Midmost(x)) -> therefore Midmost(worden)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Brina is soured. All onomastic people are sapphire. All soured people are onomastic. All sapphire people are mormon. Brina is sapphire.", "logic": "\nSoured(brina)\nforall x (Onomastic(x) -> Sapphire(x))\nforall x (Soured(x) -> Onomastic(x))\nforall x (Sapphire(x) -> Mormon(x))\n\nSapphire(brina)\n\nSoured(brina) and forall x (Soured(x) -> Onomastic(x)) -> therefore Onomastic(brina) Onomastic(brina) and forall x (Onomastic(x) -> Sapphire(x)) -> therefore Sapphire(brina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Brigit is egregious. All staple people are chlamydial. All egregious people are staple. All chlamydial people are twelve. Brigit is not chlamydial.", "logic": "\nEgregious(brigit)\nforall x (Staple(x) -> Chlamydial(x))\nforall x (Egregious(x) -> Staple(x))\nforall x (Chlamydial(x) -> Twelve(x))\n\nnot Chlamydial(brigit)\n\nEgregious(brigit) and forall x (Egregious(x) -> Staple(x)) -> therefore Staple(brigit) Staple(brigit) and forall x (Staple(x) -> Chlamydial(x)) -> therefore Chlamydial(brigit)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Enid is untempered. All invincible people are gravelly. All untempered people are invincible. All gravelly people are catty. Enid is catty.", "logic": "\nUntempered(enid)\nforall x (Invincible(x) -> Gravelly(x))\nforall x (Untempered(x) -> Invincible(x))\nforall x (Gravelly(x) -> Catty(x))\n\nCatty(enid)\n\nUntempered(enid) and forall x (Untempered(x) -> Invincible(x)) -> therefore Invincible(enid) Invincible(enid) and forall x (Invincible(x) -> Gravelly(x)) -> therefore Gravelly(enid) Gravelly(enid) and forall x (Gravelly(x) -> Catty(x)) -> therefore Catty(enid)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Shayla is illegible. All cambodian people are blissful. All illegible people are cambodian. All blissful people are redbrick. Shayla is not redbrick.", "logic": "\nIllegible(shayla)\nforall x (Cambodian(x) -> Blissful(x))\nforall x (Illegible(x) -> Cambodian(x))\nforall x (Blissful(x) -> Redbrick(x))\n\nnot Redbrick(shayla)\n\nIllegible(shayla) and forall x (Illegible(x) -> Cambodian(x)) -> therefore Cambodian(shayla) Cambodian(shayla) and forall x (Cambodian(x) -> Blissful(x)) -> therefore Blissful(shayla) Blissful(shayla) and forall x (Blissful(x) -> Redbrick(x)) -> therefore Redbrick(shayla)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Orelle is columned. All giving people are mastered. All columned people are giving. All mastered people are jittery. Orelle is not white.", "logic": "\nColumned(orelle)\nforall x (Giving(x) -> Mastered(x))\nforall x (Columned(x) -> Giving(x))\nforall x (Mastered(x) -> Jittery(x))\n\nnot White(orelle)\n\nnot White(orelle) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "Maddalena is extended. All ossiculate people are antiblack. All extended people are ossiculate. All antiblack people are cacogenic. Maddalena is rough.", "logic": "\nExtended(maddalena)\nforall x (Ossiculate(x) -> Antiblack(x))\nforall x (Extended(x) -> Ossiculate(x))\nforall x (Antiblack(x) -> Cacogenic(x))\n\nRough(maddalena)\n\nRough(maddalena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNeg-OWA-D3-940"} {"premises": "The jody is umber. The jody is esthetic. The jody is untypical. All umber, untypical people are plentiful. If someone is umber then they are esthetic. If the jody is untypical and the jody is dying then the jody is umber. Green, untypical people are plentiful. If someone is esthetic and umber then they are untypical. Green people are plentiful. Kind people are untypical. If someone is esthetic and untypical then they are plentiful. The jody is untypical.", "logic": "\nUmber(jody)\nEsthetic(jody)\nUntypical(jody)\nforall x (Umber(x) and Untypical(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Umber(x) -> Esthetic(x))\nUntypical(jody) and Dying(jody) -> Umber(jody)\nforall x (Dying(x) and Untypical(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Esthetic(x) and Umber(x) -> Untypical(x))\nforall x (Dying(x) -> Plentiful(x))\nforall x (Plentiful(x) -> Untypical(x))\nforall x (Esthetic(x) and Untypical(x) -> Plentiful(x))\n\nUntypical(jody)\n\ntherefore Untypical(jody)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3044"} {"premises": "The sonnie is loud. The sonnie is staid. The sonnie is unfixed. All loud, unfixed people are chartered. If someone is loud then they are staid. If the sonnie is unfixed and the sonnie is frugal then the sonnie is loud. Green, unfixed people are chartered. If someone is staid and loud then they are unfixed. Green people are chartered. Kind people are unfixed. If someone is staid and unfixed then they are chartered. The sonnie is not loud.", "logic": "\nLoud(sonnie)\nStaid(sonnie)\nUnfixed(sonnie)\nforall x (Loud(x) and Unfixed(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Loud(x) -> Staid(x))\nUnfixed(sonnie) and Frugal(sonnie) -> Loud(sonnie)\nforall x (Frugal(x) and Unfixed(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) and Loud(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Frugal(x) -> Chartered(x))\nforall x (Chartered(x) -> Unfixed(x))\nforall x (Staid(x) and Unfixed(x) -> Chartered(x))\n\nnot Loud(sonnie)\n\ntherefore Loud(sonnie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3044"} {"premises": "The ingamar is squeaky. The ingamar is debatable. The ingamar is solemn. All squeaky, solemn people are bumpkinly. If someone is squeaky then they are debatable. If the ingamar is solemn and the ingamar is haitian then the ingamar is squeaky. Green, solemn people are bumpkinly. If someone is debatable and squeaky then they are solemn. Green people are bumpkinly. Kind people are solemn. If someone is debatable and solemn then they are bumpkinly. The ingamar does not chase the ingamar.", "logic": "\nSqueaky(ingamar)\nDebatable(ingamar)\nSolemn(ingamar)\nforall x (Squeaky(x) and Solemn(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Squeaky(x) -> Debatable(x))\nSolemn(ingamar) and Haitian(ingamar) -> Squeaky(ingamar)\nforall x (Haitian(x) and Solemn(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Debatable(x) and Squeaky(x) -> Solemn(x))\nforall x (Haitian(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\nforall x (Bumpkinly(x) -> Solemn(x))\nforall x (Debatable(x) and Solemn(x) -> Bumpkinly(x))\n\nnot Chases(ingamar, ingamar)\n\nnot Chases(ingamar, ingamar) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3044"} {"premises": "The levon is unlifelike. The levon is pillared. The levon is protracted. All unlifelike, protracted people are squalling. If someone is unlifelike then they are pillared. If the levon is protracted and the levon is sublimate then the levon is unlifelike. Green, protracted people are squalling. If someone is pillared and unlifelike then they are protracted. Green people are squalling. Kind people are protracted. If someone is pillared and protracted then they are squalling. The levon likes the levon.", "logic": "\nUnlifelike(levon)\nPillared(levon)\nProtracted(levon)\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) and Protracted(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Unlifelike(x) -> Pillared(x))\nProtracted(levon) and Sublimate(levon) -> Unlifelike(levon)\nforall x (Sublimate(x) and Protracted(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Pillared(x) and Unlifelike(x) -> Protracted(x))\nforall x (Sublimate(x) -> Squalling(x))\nforall x (Squalling(x) -> Protracted(x))\nforall x (Pillared(x) and Protracted(x) -> Squalling(x))\n\nLikes(levon, levon)\n\nLikes(levon, levon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D0-3044"} {"premises": "Beverly is silicious. Beverly is heathen. Beverly is unsigned. Beverly is endogenic. Beverly is executable. Beverly is euclidean. Beverly is unchewable. Caldwell is unsigned. Caldwell is executable. Aloisia is silicious. Aloisia is heathen. Aloisia is unsigned. Aloisia is endogenic. Aloisia is euclidean. Aloisia is unchewable. If something is heathen then it is executable. Round things are endogenic. Rough, unsigned things are euclidean. Quiet, executable things are endogenic. Smart, executable things are unchewable. Kind, unchewable things are unsigned. Aloisia is endogenic.", "logic": "\nSilicious(beverly)\nHeathen(beverly)\nUnsigned(beverly)\nEndogenic(beverly)\nExecutable(beverly)\nEuclidean(beverly)\nUnchewable(beverly)\nUnsigned(caldwell)\nExecutable(caldwell)\nSilicious(aloisia)\nHeathen(aloisia)\nUnsigned(aloisia)\nEndogenic(aloisia)\nEuclidean(aloisia)\nUnchewable(aloisia)\nforall x (Heathen(x) -> Executable(x))\nforall x (Executable(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Endogenic(x) and Unsigned(x) -> Euclidean(x))\nforall x (Unsigned(x) and Executable(x) -> Endogenic(x))\nforall x (Euclidean(x) and Executable(x) -> Unchewable(x))\nforall x (Heathen(x) and Unchewable(x) -> Unsigned(x))\n\nEndogenic(aloisia)\n\ntherefore Endogenic(aloisia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Lucio is stoned. Lucio is premarital. Lucio is topical. Lucio is engraved. Lucio is unabated. Lucio is rigorous. Lucio is disunited. Ethelda is topical. Ethelda is unabated. Paolo is stoned. Paolo is premarital. Paolo is topical. Paolo is engraved. Paolo is rigorous. Paolo is disunited. If something is premarital then it is unabated. Round things are engraved. Rough, topical things are rigorous. Quiet, unabated things are engraved. Smart, unabated things are disunited. Kind, disunited things are topical. Paolo is not topical.", "logic": "\nStoned(lucio)\nPremarital(lucio)\nTopical(lucio)\nEngraved(lucio)\nUnabated(lucio)\nRigorous(lucio)\nDisunited(lucio)\nTopical(ethelda)\nUnabated(ethelda)\nStoned(paolo)\nPremarital(paolo)\nTopical(paolo)\nEngraved(paolo)\nRigorous(paolo)\nDisunited(paolo)\nforall x (Premarital(x) -> Unabated(x))\nforall x (Unabated(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Engraved(x) and Topical(x) -> Rigorous(x))\nforall x (Topical(x) and Unabated(x) -> Engraved(x))\nforall x (Rigorous(x) and Unabated(x) -> Disunited(x))\nforall x (Premarital(x) and Disunited(x) -> Topical(x))\n\nnot Topical(paolo)\n\ntherefore Topical(paolo)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Charmane is allowable. Charmane is zygomatic. Charmane is expendable. Charmane is cognizable. Charmane is meshuga. Charmane is unshared. Charmane is unratable. Willdon is expendable. Willdon is meshuga. Larina is allowable. Larina is zygomatic. Larina is expendable. Larina is cognizable. Larina is unshared. Larina is unratable. If something is zygomatic then it is meshuga. Round things are cognizable. Rough, expendable things are unshared. Quiet, meshuga things are cognizable. Smart, meshuga things are unratable. Kind, unratable things are expendable. Willdon is cognizable.", "logic": "\nAllowable(charmane)\nZygomatic(charmane)\nExpendable(charmane)\nCognizable(charmane)\nMeshuga(charmane)\nUnshared(charmane)\nUnratable(charmane)\nExpendable(willdon)\nMeshuga(willdon)\nAllowable(larina)\nZygomatic(larina)\nExpendable(larina)\nCognizable(larina)\nUnshared(larina)\nUnratable(larina)\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) -> Meshuga(x))\nforall x (Meshuga(x) -> Cognizable(x))\nforall x (Cognizable(x) and Expendable(x) -> Unshared(x))\nforall x (Expendable(x) and Meshuga(x) -> Cognizable(x))\nforall x (Unshared(x) and Meshuga(x) -> Unratable(x))\nforall x (Zygomatic(x) and Unratable(x) -> Expendable(x))\n\nCognizable(willdon)\n\nMeshuga(willdon) and forall x (Meshuga(x) -> Cognizable(x)) -> therefore Cognizable(willdon)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Annnora is influent. Annnora is paraplegic. Annnora is authorized. Annnora is crack. Annnora is erogenous. Annnora is showery. Annnora is supersonic. Erastus is authorized. Erastus is erogenous. Barthel is influent. Barthel is paraplegic. Barthel is authorized. Barthel is crack. Barthel is showery. Barthel is supersonic. If something is paraplegic then it is erogenous. Round things are crack. Rough, authorized things are showery. Quiet, erogenous things are crack. Smart, erogenous things are supersonic. Kind, supersonic things are authorized. Erastus is not crack.", "logic": "\nInfluent(annnora)\nParaplegic(annnora)\nAuthorized(annnora)\nCrack(annnora)\nErogenous(annnora)\nShowery(annnora)\nSupersonic(annnora)\nAuthorized(erastus)\nErogenous(erastus)\nInfluent(barthel)\nParaplegic(barthel)\nAuthorized(barthel)\nCrack(barthel)\nShowery(barthel)\nSupersonic(barthel)\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) -> Erogenous(x))\nforall x (Erogenous(x) -> Crack(x))\nforall x (Crack(x) and Authorized(x) -> Showery(x))\nforall x (Authorized(x) and Erogenous(x) -> Crack(x))\nforall x (Showery(x) and Erogenous(x) -> Supersonic(x))\nforall x (Paraplegic(x) and Supersonic(x) -> Authorized(x))\n\nnot Crack(erastus)\n\nErogenous(erastus) and forall x (Erogenous(x) -> Crack(x)) -> therefore Crack(erastus)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Meredeth is tomboyish. Meredeth is camphoric. Meredeth is youngish. Meredeth is syncopated. Meredeth is sweetheart. Meredeth is secondary. Meredeth is metastable. Liora is youngish. Liora is sweetheart. Sarina is tomboyish. Sarina is camphoric. Sarina is youngish. Sarina is syncopated. Sarina is secondary. Sarina is metastable. If something is camphoric then it is sweetheart. Round things are syncopated. Rough, youngish things are secondary. Quiet, sweetheart things are syncopated. Smart, sweetheart things are metastable. Kind, metastable things are youngish. Liora is secondary.", "logic": "\nTomboyish(meredeth)\nCamphoric(meredeth)\nYoungish(meredeth)\nSyncopated(meredeth)\nSweetheart(meredeth)\nSecondary(meredeth)\nMetastable(meredeth)\nYoungish(liora)\nSweetheart(liora)\nTomboyish(sarina)\nCamphoric(sarina)\nYoungish(sarina)\nSyncopated(sarina)\nSecondary(sarina)\nMetastable(sarina)\nforall x (Camphoric(x) -> Sweetheart(x))\nforall x (Sweetheart(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nforall x (Syncopated(x) and Youngish(x) -> Secondary(x))\nforall x (Youngish(x) and Sweetheart(x) -> Syncopated(x))\nforall x (Secondary(x) and Sweetheart(x) -> Metastable(x))\nforall x (Camphoric(x) and Metastable(x) -> Youngish(x))\n\nSecondary(liora)\n\nSweetheart(liora) and forall x (Sweetheart(x) -> Syncopated(x)) -> therefore Syncopated(liora) Syncopated(liora) and Youngish(liora) and forall x (Syncopated(x) and Youngish(x) -> Secondary(x)) -> therefore Secondary(liora)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Dulce is scorned. Dulce is lapsed. Dulce is gutless. Dulce is munificent. Dulce is molten. Dulce is brute. Dulce is rear. Sapphira is gutless. Sapphira is molten. Stella is scorned. Stella is lapsed. Stella is gutless. Stella is munificent. Stella is brute. Stella is rear. If something is lapsed then it is molten. Round things are munificent. Rough, gutless things are brute. Quiet, molten things are munificent. Smart, molten things are rear. Kind, rear things are gutless. Sapphira is not brute.", "logic": "\nScorned(dulce)\nLapsed(dulce)\nGutless(dulce)\nMunificent(dulce)\nMolten(dulce)\nBrute(dulce)\nRear(dulce)\nGutless(sapphira)\nMolten(sapphira)\nScorned(stella)\nLapsed(stella)\nGutless(stella)\nMunificent(stella)\nBrute(stella)\nRear(stella)\nforall x (Lapsed(x) -> Molten(x))\nforall x (Molten(x) -> Munificent(x))\nforall x (Munificent(x) and Gutless(x) -> Brute(x))\nforall x (Gutless(x) and Molten(x) -> Munificent(x))\nforall x (Brute(x) and Molten(x) -> Rear(x))\nforall x (Lapsed(x) and Rear(x) -> Gutless(x))\n\nnot Brute(sapphira)\n\nMolten(sapphira) and forall x (Molten(x) -> Munificent(x)) -> therefore Munificent(sapphira) Munificent(sapphira) and Gutless(sapphira) and forall x (Munificent(x) and Gutless(x) -> Brute(x)) -> therefore Brute(sapphira)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Reginald is horrified. Reginald is diabolic. Reginald is toasted. Reginald is nauseous. Reginald is crotchety. Reginald is antitrust. Reginald is bragging. Sayers is toasted. Sayers is crotchety. Rosamund is horrified. Rosamund is diabolic. Rosamund is toasted. Rosamund is nauseous. Rosamund is antitrust. Rosamund is bragging. If something is diabolic then it is crotchety. Round things are nauseous. Rough, toasted things are antitrust. Quiet, crotchety things are nauseous. Smart, crotchety things are bragging. Kind, bragging things are toasted. Sayers is bragging.", "logic": "\nHorrified(reginald)\nDiabolic(reginald)\nToasted(reginald)\nNauseous(reginald)\nCrotchety(reginald)\nAntitrust(reginald)\nBragging(reginald)\nToasted(sayers)\nCrotchety(sayers)\nHorrified(rosamund)\nDiabolic(rosamund)\nToasted(rosamund)\nNauseous(rosamund)\nAntitrust(rosamund)\nBragging(rosamund)\nforall x (Diabolic(x) -> Crotchety(x))\nforall x (Crotchety(x) -> Nauseous(x))\nforall x (Nauseous(x) and Toasted(x) -> Antitrust(x))\nforall x (Toasted(x) and Crotchety(x) -> Nauseous(x))\nforall x (Antitrust(x) and Crotchety(x) -> Bragging(x))\nforall x (Diabolic(x) and Bragging(x) -> Toasted(x))\n\nBragging(sayers)\n\nCrotchety(sayers) and forall x (Crotchety(x) -> Nauseous(x)) -> therefore Nauseous(sayers) Nauseous(sayers) and Toasted(sayers) and forall x (Nauseous(x) and Toasted(x) -> Antitrust(x)) -> therefore Antitrust(sayers) Antitrust(sayers) and Crotchety(sayers) and forall x (Antitrust(x) and Crotchety(x) -> Bragging(x)) -> therefore Bragging(sayers)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Nettle is pubic. Nettle is atrophied. Nettle is augitic. Nettle is idempotent. Nettle is reliant. Nettle is ductless. Nettle is faithless. Burl is augitic. Burl is reliant. Isidore is pubic. Isidore is atrophied. Isidore is augitic. Isidore is idempotent. Isidore is ductless. Isidore is faithless. If something is atrophied then it is reliant. Round things are idempotent. Rough, augitic things are ductless. Quiet, reliant things are idempotent. Smart, reliant things are faithless. Kind, faithless things are augitic. Burl is not faithless.", "logic": "\nPubic(nettle)\nAtrophied(nettle)\nAugitic(nettle)\nIdempotent(nettle)\nReliant(nettle)\nDuctless(nettle)\nFaithless(nettle)\nAugitic(burl)\nReliant(burl)\nPubic(isidore)\nAtrophied(isidore)\nAugitic(isidore)\nIdempotent(isidore)\nDuctless(isidore)\nFaithless(isidore)\nforall x (Atrophied(x) -> Reliant(x))\nforall x (Reliant(x) -> Idempotent(x))\nforall x (Idempotent(x) and Augitic(x) -> Ductless(x))\nforall x (Augitic(x) and Reliant(x) -> Idempotent(x))\nforall x (Ductless(x) and Reliant(x) -> Faithless(x))\nforall x (Atrophied(x) and Faithless(x) -> Augitic(x))\n\nnot Faithless(burl)\n\nReliant(burl) and forall x (Reliant(x) -> Idempotent(x)) -> therefore Idempotent(burl) Idempotent(burl) and Augitic(burl) and forall x (Idempotent(x) and Augitic(x) -> Ductless(x)) -> therefore Ductless(burl) Ductless(burl) and Reliant(burl) and forall x (Ductless(x) and Reliant(x) -> Faithless(x)) -> therefore Faithless(burl)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Janenna is unhoped. Janenna is savory. Janenna is uptight. Janenna is cambrian. Janenna is micaceous. Janenna is bionomic. Janenna is enteral. Nona is uptight. Nona is micaceous. Kaile is unhoped. Kaile is savory. Kaile is uptight. Kaile is cambrian. Kaile is bionomic. Kaile is enteral. If something is savory then it is micaceous. Round things are cambrian. Rough, uptight things are bionomic. Quiet, micaceous things are cambrian. Smart, micaceous things are enteral. Kind, enteral things are uptight. Nona is not unhoped.", "logic": "\nUnhoped(janenna)\nSavory(janenna)\nUptight(janenna)\nCambrian(janenna)\nMicaceous(janenna)\nBionomic(janenna)\nEnteral(janenna)\nUptight(nona)\nMicaceous(nona)\nUnhoped(kaile)\nSavory(kaile)\nUptight(kaile)\nCambrian(kaile)\nBionomic(kaile)\nEnteral(kaile)\nforall x (Savory(x) -> Micaceous(x))\nforall x (Micaceous(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Cambrian(x) and Uptight(x) -> Bionomic(x))\nforall x (Uptight(x) and Micaceous(x) -> Cambrian(x))\nforall x (Bionomic(x) and Micaceous(x) -> Enteral(x))\nforall x (Savory(x) and Enteral(x) -> Uptight(x))\n\nnot Unhoped(nona)\n\nnot Unhoped(nona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "Milt is neat. Milt is deserted. Milt is homocyclic. Milt is unrivaled. Milt is hominid. Milt is adolescent. Milt is retractile. Goldina is homocyclic. Goldina is hominid. Doralynne is neat. Doralynne is deserted. Doralynne is homocyclic. Doralynne is unrivaled. Doralynne is adolescent. Doralynne is retractile. If something is deserted then it is hominid. Round things are unrivaled. Rough, homocyclic things are adolescent. Quiet, hominid things are unrivaled. Smart, hominid things are retractile. Kind, retractile things are homocyclic. Goldina is deserted.", "logic": "\nNeat(milt)\nDeserted(milt)\nHomocyclic(milt)\nUnrivaled(milt)\nHominid(milt)\nAdolescent(milt)\nRetractile(milt)\nHomocyclic(goldina)\nHominid(goldina)\nNeat(doralynne)\nDeserted(doralynne)\nHomocyclic(doralynne)\nUnrivaled(doralynne)\nAdolescent(doralynne)\nRetractile(doralynne)\nforall x (Deserted(x) -> Hominid(x))\nforall x (Hominid(x) -> Unrivaled(x))\nforall x (Unrivaled(x) and Homocyclic(x) -> Adolescent(x))\nforall x (Homocyclic(x) and Hominid(x) -> Unrivaled(x))\nforall x (Adolescent(x) and Hominid(x) -> Retractile(x))\nforall x (Deserted(x) and Retractile(x) -> Homocyclic(x))\n\nDeserted(goldina)\n\nDeserted(goldina) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-1801"} {"premises": "The ilana waft the glenn. The ilana host the elnore. The elnore is tingling. The elnore jumpstart the glenn. The elnore waft the ilana. The elnore host the marinna. The elnore host the glenn. The marinna is paralytic. The marinna is landless. The marinna waft the ilana. The marinna waft the elnore. The marinna host the elnore. The glenn jumpstart the marinna. The glenn waft the ilana. The glenn host the elnore. If something jumpstart the ilana then it host the marinna. If something jumpstart the glenn then the glenn jumpstart the ilana. If the glenn host the marinna then the glenn waft the marinna. If something is landless and it jumpstart the elnore then it is shorthand. If something jumpstart the glenn and the glenn waft the ilana then the glenn is midweekly. If the elnore host the marinna and the elnore jumpstart the glenn then the elnore is paralytic. The glenn waft the ilana.", "logic": "\nWaft(ilana, glenn)\nHost(ilana, elnore)\nTingling(elnore)\nJumpstart(elnore, glenn)\nWaft(elnore, ilana)\nHost(elnore, marinna)\nHost(elnore, glenn)\nParalytic(marinna)\nLandless(marinna)\nWaft(marinna, ilana)\nWaft(marinna, elnore)\nHost(marinna, elnore)\nJumpstart(glenn, marinna)\nWaft(glenn, ilana)\nHost(glenn, elnore)\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, ilana) -> Host(x, marinna))\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, glenn) -> Jumpstart(glenn, ilana))\nHost(glenn, marinna) -> Waft(glenn, marinna)\nforall x (Landless(x) and Jumpstart(x, elnore) -> Shorthand(x))\nforall x (Jumpstart(x, glenn) and Waft(glenn, ilana) -> Midweekly(glenn))\nHost(elnore, marinna) and Jumpstart(elnore, glenn) -> Paralytic(elnore)\n\nWaft(glenn, ilana)\n\ntherefore Waft(glenn, ilana)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The roanna alcoholise the flossie. The roanna mistreat the marylin. The marylin is repand. The marylin obsolesce the flossie. The marylin alcoholise the roanna. The marylin mistreat the hayley. The marylin mistreat the flossie. The hayley is bluish. The hayley is sportive. The hayley alcoholise the roanna. The hayley alcoholise the marylin. The hayley mistreat the marylin. The flossie obsolesce the hayley. The flossie alcoholise the roanna. The flossie mistreat the marylin. If something obsolesce the roanna then it mistreat the hayley. If something obsolesce the flossie then the flossie obsolesce the roanna. If the flossie mistreat the hayley then the flossie alcoholise the hayley. If something is sportive and it obsolesce the marylin then it is occidental. If something obsolesce the flossie and the flossie alcoholise the roanna then the flossie is aquiline. If the marylin mistreat the hayley and the marylin obsolesce the flossie then the marylin is bluish. The marylin does not see the roanna.", "logic": "\nAlcoholise(roanna, flossie)\nMistreat(roanna, marylin)\nRepand(marylin)\nObsolesce(marylin, flossie)\nAlcoholise(marylin, roanna)\nMistreat(marylin, hayley)\nMistreat(marylin, flossie)\nBluish(hayley)\nSportive(hayley)\nAlcoholise(hayley, roanna)\nAlcoholise(hayley, marylin)\nMistreat(hayley, marylin)\nObsolesce(flossie, hayley)\nAlcoholise(flossie, roanna)\nMistreat(flossie, marylin)\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, roanna) -> Mistreat(x, hayley))\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, flossie) -> Obsolesce(flossie, roanna))\nMistreat(flossie, hayley) -> Alcoholise(flossie, hayley)\nforall x (Sportive(x) and Obsolesce(x, marylin) -> Occidental(x))\nforall x (Obsolesce(x, flossie) and Alcoholise(flossie, roanna) -> Aquiline(flossie))\nMistreat(marylin, hayley) and Obsolesce(marylin, flossie) -> Bluish(marylin)\n\nnot Alcoholise(marylin, roanna)\n\ntherefore Alcoholise(marylin, roanna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The sherry unpick the engracia. The sherry blotch the teane. The teane is theoretic. The teane codify the engracia. The teane unpick the sherry. The teane blotch the cresa. The teane blotch the engracia. The cresa is livable. The cresa is seamanly. The cresa unpick the sherry. The cresa unpick the teane. The cresa blotch the teane. The engracia codify the cresa. The engracia unpick the sherry. The engracia blotch the teane. If something codify the sherry then it blotch the cresa. If something codify the engracia then the engracia codify the sherry. If the engracia blotch the cresa then the engracia unpick the cresa. If something is seamanly and it codify the teane then it is brut. If something codify the engracia and the engracia unpick the sherry then the engracia is evaporated. If the teane blotch the cresa and the teane codify the engracia then the teane is livable. The engracia is evaporated.", "logic": "\nUnpick(sherry, engracia)\nBlotch(sherry, teane)\nTheoretic(teane)\nCodify(teane, engracia)\nUnpick(teane, sherry)\nBlotch(teane, cresa)\nBlotch(teane, engracia)\nLivable(cresa)\nSeamanly(cresa)\nUnpick(cresa, sherry)\nUnpick(cresa, teane)\nBlotch(cresa, teane)\nCodify(engracia, cresa)\nUnpick(engracia, sherry)\nBlotch(engracia, teane)\nforall x (Codify(x, sherry) -> Blotch(x, cresa))\nforall x (Codify(x, engracia) -> Codify(engracia, sherry))\nBlotch(engracia, cresa) -> Unpick(engracia, cresa)\nforall x (Seamanly(x) and Codify(x, teane) -> Brut(x))\nforall x (Codify(x, engracia) and Unpick(engracia, sherry) -> Evaporated(engracia))\nBlotch(teane, cresa) and Codify(teane, engracia) -> Livable(teane)\n\nEvaporated(engracia)\n\nCodify(teane, engracia) and Unpick(engracia, sherry) and forall x (Codify(x, engracia) and Unpick(engracia, sherry) -> Evaporated(engracia)) -> therefore Evaporated(engracia)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The carlita warehouse the casey. The carlita intimate the issy. The issy is actionable. The issy sterilise the casey. The issy warehouse the carlita. The issy intimate the weidar. The issy intimate the casey. The weidar is atrophied. The weidar is muhammadan. The weidar warehouse the carlita. The weidar warehouse the issy. The weidar intimate the issy. The casey sterilise the weidar. The casey warehouse the carlita. The casey intimate the issy. If something sterilise the carlita then it intimate the weidar. If something sterilise the casey then the casey sterilise the carlita. If the casey intimate the weidar then the casey warehouse the weidar. If something is muhammadan and it sterilise the issy then it is ciliary. If something sterilise the casey and the casey warehouse the carlita then the casey is boolean. If the issy intimate the weidar and the issy sterilise the casey then the issy is atrophied. The casey is not boolean.", "logic": "\nWarehouse(carlita, casey)\nIntimate(carlita, issy)\nActionable(issy)\nSterilise(issy, casey)\nWarehouse(issy, carlita)\nIntimate(issy, weidar)\nIntimate(issy, casey)\nAtrophied(weidar)\nMuhammadan(weidar)\nWarehouse(weidar, carlita)\nWarehouse(weidar, issy)\nIntimate(weidar, issy)\nSterilise(casey, weidar)\nWarehouse(casey, carlita)\nIntimate(casey, issy)\nforall x (Sterilise(x, carlita) -> Intimate(x, weidar))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, casey) -> Sterilise(casey, carlita))\nIntimate(casey, weidar) -> Warehouse(casey, weidar)\nforall x (Muhammadan(x) and Sterilise(x, issy) -> Ciliary(x))\nforall x (Sterilise(x, casey) and Warehouse(casey, carlita) -> Boolean(casey))\nIntimate(issy, weidar) and Sterilise(issy, casey) -> Atrophied(issy)\n\nnot Boolean(casey)\n\nSterilise(issy, casey) and Warehouse(casey, carlita) and forall x (Sterilise(x, casey) and Warehouse(casey, carlita) -> Boolean(casey)) -> therefore Boolean(casey)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The joey differ the virgilio. The joey hint the normand. The normand is reparable. The normand interest the virgilio. The normand differ the joey. The normand hint the suzette. The normand hint the virgilio. The suzette is biological. The suzette is solar. The suzette differ the joey. The suzette differ the normand. The suzette hint the normand. The virgilio interest the suzette. The virgilio differ the joey. The virgilio hint the normand. If something interest the joey then it hint the suzette. If something interest the virgilio then the virgilio interest the joey. If the virgilio hint the suzette then the virgilio differ the suzette. If something is solar and it interest the normand then it is neritic. If something interest the virgilio and the virgilio differ the joey then the virgilio is unstuck. If the normand hint the suzette and the normand interest the virgilio then the normand is biological. The virgilio hint the suzette.", "logic": "\nDiffer(joey, virgilio)\nHint(joey, normand)\nReparable(normand)\nInterest(normand, virgilio)\nDiffer(normand, joey)\nHint(normand, suzette)\nHint(normand, virgilio)\nBiological(suzette)\nSolar(suzette)\nDiffer(suzette, joey)\nDiffer(suzette, normand)\nHint(suzette, normand)\nInterest(virgilio, suzette)\nDiffer(virgilio, joey)\nHint(virgilio, normand)\nforall x (Interest(x, joey) -> Hint(x, suzette))\nforall x (Interest(x, virgilio) -> Interest(virgilio, joey))\nHint(virgilio, suzette) -> Differ(virgilio, suzette)\nforall x (Solar(x) and Interest(x, normand) -> Neritic(x))\nforall x (Interest(x, virgilio) and Differ(virgilio, joey) -> Unstuck(virgilio))\nHint(normand, suzette) and Interest(normand, virgilio) -> Biological(normand)\n\nHint(virgilio, suzette)\n\nInterest(normand, virgilio) and forall x (Interest(x, virgilio) -> Interest(virgilio, joey)) -> therefore Interest(virgilio, joey) Interest(virgilio, joey) and forall x (Interest(x, joey) -> Hint(x, suzette)) -> therefore Hint(virgilio, suzette)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The vivia quantise the mackenzie. The vivia jerk the anita. The anita is ghanese. The anita downsize the mackenzie. The anita quantise the vivia. The anita jerk the betsy. The anita jerk the mackenzie. The betsy is unseemly. The betsy is italic. The betsy quantise the vivia. The betsy quantise the anita. The betsy jerk the anita. The mackenzie downsize the betsy. The mackenzie quantise the vivia. The mackenzie jerk the anita. If something downsize the vivia then it jerk the betsy. If something downsize the mackenzie then the mackenzie downsize the vivia. If the mackenzie jerk the betsy then the mackenzie quantise the betsy. If something is italic and it downsize the anita then it is pinstriped. If something downsize the mackenzie and the mackenzie quantise the vivia then the mackenzie is kinglike. If the anita jerk the betsy and the anita downsize the mackenzie then the anita is unseemly. The mackenzie does not visit the betsy.", "logic": "\nQuantise(vivia, mackenzie)\nJerk(vivia, anita)\nGhanese(anita)\nDownsize(anita, mackenzie)\nQuantise(anita, vivia)\nJerk(anita, betsy)\nJerk(anita, mackenzie)\nUnseemly(betsy)\nItalic(betsy)\nQuantise(betsy, vivia)\nQuantise(betsy, anita)\nJerk(betsy, anita)\nDownsize(mackenzie, betsy)\nQuantise(mackenzie, vivia)\nJerk(mackenzie, anita)\nforall x (Downsize(x, vivia) -> Jerk(x, betsy))\nforall x (Downsize(x, mackenzie) -> Downsize(mackenzie, vivia))\nJerk(mackenzie, betsy) -> Quantise(mackenzie, betsy)\nforall x (Italic(x) and Downsize(x, anita) -> Pinstriped(x))\nforall x (Downsize(x, mackenzie) and Quantise(mackenzie, vivia) -> Kinglike(mackenzie))\nJerk(anita, betsy) and Downsize(anita, mackenzie) -> Unseemly(anita)\n\nnot Jerk(mackenzie, betsy)\n\nDownsize(anita, mackenzie) and forall x (Downsize(x, mackenzie) -> Downsize(mackenzie, vivia)) -> therefore Downsize(mackenzie, vivia) Downsize(mackenzie, vivia) and forall x (Downsize(x, vivia) -> Jerk(x, betsy)) -> therefore Jerk(mackenzie, betsy)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The vannie carnalise the wilie. The vannie dissociate the tadd. The tadd is capsular. The tadd hover the wilie. The tadd carnalise the vannie. The tadd dissociate the shirline. The tadd dissociate the wilie. The shirline is sugared. The shirline is rose. The shirline carnalise the vannie. The shirline carnalise the tadd. The shirline dissociate the tadd. The wilie hover the shirline. The wilie carnalise the vannie. The wilie dissociate the tadd. If something hover the vannie then it dissociate the shirline. If something hover the wilie then the wilie hover the vannie. If the wilie dissociate the shirline then the wilie carnalise the shirline. If something is rose and it hover the tadd then it is champion. If something hover the wilie and the wilie carnalise the vannie then the wilie is inveterate. If the tadd dissociate the shirline and the tadd hover the wilie then the tadd is sugared. The wilie carnalise the shirline.", "logic": "\nCarnalise(vannie, wilie)\nDissociate(vannie, tadd)\nCapsular(tadd)\nHover(tadd, wilie)\nCarnalise(tadd, vannie)\nDissociate(tadd, shirline)\nDissociate(tadd, wilie)\nSugared(shirline)\nRose(shirline)\nCarnalise(shirline, vannie)\nCarnalise(shirline, tadd)\nDissociate(shirline, tadd)\nHover(wilie, shirline)\nCarnalise(wilie, vannie)\nDissociate(wilie, tadd)\nforall x (Hover(x, vannie) -> Dissociate(x, shirline))\nforall x (Hover(x, wilie) -> Hover(wilie, vannie))\nDissociate(wilie, shirline) -> Carnalise(wilie, shirline)\nforall x (Rose(x) and Hover(x, tadd) -> Champion(x))\nforall x (Hover(x, wilie) and Carnalise(wilie, vannie) -> Inveterate(wilie))\nDissociate(tadd, shirline) and Hover(tadd, wilie) -> Sugared(tadd)\n\nCarnalise(wilie, shirline)\n\nHover(tadd, wilie) and forall x (Hover(x, wilie) -> Hover(wilie, vannie)) -> therefore Hover(wilie, vannie) Hover(wilie, vannie) and forall x (Hover(x, vannie) -> Dissociate(x, shirline)) -> therefore Dissociate(wilie, shirline) Dissociate(wilie, shirline) and Dissociate(wilie, shirline) -> Carnalise(wilie, shirline) -> therefore Carnalise(wilie, shirline)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The angel enslave the corey. The angel sting the jarvis. The jarvis is unbaptised. The jarvis chairman the corey. The jarvis enslave the angel. The jarvis sting the jammie. The jarvis sting the corey. The jammie is migratory. The jammie is charming. The jammie enslave the angel. The jammie enslave the jarvis. The jammie sting the jarvis. The corey chairman the jammie. The corey enslave the angel. The corey sting the jarvis. If something chairman the angel then it sting the jammie. If something chairman the corey then the corey chairman the angel. If the corey sting the jammie then the corey enslave the jammie. If something is charming and it chairman the jarvis then it is tertiary. If something chairman the corey and the corey enslave the angel then the corey is inside. If the jarvis sting the jammie and the jarvis chairman the corey then the jarvis is migratory. The corey does not see the jammie.", "logic": "\nEnslave(angel, corey)\nSting(angel, jarvis)\nUnbaptised(jarvis)\nChairman(jarvis, corey)\nEnslave(jarvis, angel)\nSting(jarvis, jammie)\nSting(jarvis, corey)\nMigratory(jammie)\nCharming(jammie)\nEnslave(jammie, angel)\nEnslave(jammie, jarvis)\nSting(jammie, jarvis)\nChairman(corey, jammie)\nEnslave(corey, angel)\nSting(corey, jarvis)\nforall x (Chairman(x, angel) -> Sting(x, jammie))\nforall x (Chairman(x, corey) -> Chairman(corey, angel))\nSting(corey, jammie) -> Enslave(corey, jammie)\nforall x (Charming(x) and Chairman(x, jarvis) -> Tertiary(x))\nforall x (Chairman(x, corey) and Enslave(corey, angel) -> Inside(corey))\nSting(jarvis, jammie) and Chairman(jarvis, corey) -> Migratory(jarvis)\n\nnot Enslave(corey, jammie)\n\nChairman(jarvis, corey) and forall x (Chairman(x, corey) -> Chairman(corey, angel)) -> therefore Chairman(corey, angel) Chairman(corey, angel) and forall x (Chairman(x, angel) -> Sting(x, jammie)) -> therefore Sting(corey, jammie) Sting(corey, jammie) and Sting(corey, jammie) -> Enslave(corey, jammie) -> therefore Enslave(corey, jammie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The mab bury the morganne. The mab auction the crissie. The crissie is artificial. The crissie refinance the morganne. The crissie bury the mab. The crissie auction the ileana. The crissie auction the morganne. The ileana is unprovoked. The ileana is dustlike. The ileana bury the mab. The ileana bury the crissie. The ileana auction the crissie. The morganne refinance the ileana. The morganne bury the mab. The morganne auction the crissie. If something refinance the mab then it auction the ileana. If something refinance the morganne then the morganne refinance the mab. If the morganne auction the ileana then the morganne bury the ileana. If something is dustlike and it refinance the crissie then it is untoasted. If something refinance the morganne and the morganne bury the mab then the morganne is primordial. If the crissie auction the ileana and the crissie refinance the morganne then the crissie is unprovoked. The mab is not untoasted.", "logic": "\nBury(mab, morganne)\nAuction(mab, crissie)\nArtificial(crissie)\nRefinance(crissie, morganne)\nBury(crissie, mab)\nAuction(crissie, ileana)\nAuction(crissie, morganne)\nUnprovoked(ileana)\nDustlike(ileana)\nBury(ileana, mab)\nBury(ileana, crissie)\nAuction(ileana, crissie)\nRefinance(morganne, ileana)\nBury(morganne, mab)\nAuction(morganne, crissie)\nforall x (Refinance(x, mab) -> Auction(x, ileana))\nforall x (Refinance(x, morganne) -> Refinance(morganne, mab))\nAuction(morganne, ileana) -> Bury(morganne, ileana)\nforall x (Dustlike(x) and Refinance(x, crissie) -> Untoasted(x))\nforall x (Refinance(x, morganne) and Bury(morganne, mab) -> Primordial(morganne))\nAuction(crissie, ileana) and Refinance(crissie, morganne) -> Unprovoked(crissie)\n\nnot Untoasted(mab)\n\nforall x (Dustlike(x) and Refinance(x, crissie) -> Untoasted(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The brook smash the lydia. The brook lyophilize the tedmund. The tedmund is burbly. The tedmund nutrify the lydia. The tedmund smash the brook. The tedmund lyophilize the billy. The tedmund lyophilize the lydia. The billy is kurdish. The billy is sweeping. The billy smash the brook. The billy smash the tedmund. The billy lyophilize the tedmund. The lydia nutrify the billy. The lydia smash the brook. The lydia lyophilize the tedmund. If something nutrify the brook then it lyophilize the billy. If something nutrify the lydia then the lydia nutrify the brook. If the lydia lyophilize the billy then the lydia smash the billy. If something is sweeping and it nutrify the tedmund then it is mere. If something nutrify the lydia and the lydia smash the brook then the lydia is scalelike. If the tedmund lyophilize the billy and the tedmund nutrify the lydia then the tedmund is kurdish. The billy is mere.", "logic": "\nSmash(brook, lydia)\nLyophilize(brook, tedmund)\nBurbly(tedmund)\nNutrify(tedmund, lydia)\nSmash(tedmund, brook)\nLyophilize(tedmund, billy)\nLyophilize(tedmund, lydia)\nKurdish(billy)\nSweeping(billy)\nSmash(billy, brook)\nSmash(billy, tedmund)\nLyophilize(billy, tedmund)\nNutrify(lydia, billy)\nSmash(lydia, brook)\nLyophilize(lydia, tedmund)\nforall x (Nutrify(x, brook) -> Lyophilize(x, billy))\nforall x (Nutrify(x, lydia) -> Nutrify(lydia, brook))\nLyophilize(lydia, billy) -> Smash(lydia, billy)\nforall x (Sweeping(x) and Nutrify(x, tedmund) -> Mere(x))\nforall x (Nutrify(x, lydia) and Smash(lydia, brook) -> Scalelike(lydia))\nLyophilize(tedmund, billy) and Nutrify(tedmund, lydia) -> Kurdish(tedmund)\n\nMere(billy)\n\nforall x (Sweeping(x) and Nutrify(x, tedmund) -> Mere(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The dea englut the pansy. The dea prizefight the ferinand. The ferinand is unfertile. The ferinand rive the pansy. The ferinand englut the dea. The ferinand prizefight the shelden. The ferinand prizefight the pansy. The shelden is knockabout. The shelden is menial. The shelden englut the dea. The shelden englut the ferinand. The shelden prizefight the ferinand. The pansy rive the shelden. The pansy englut the dea. The pansy prizefight the ferinand. If something rive the dea then it prizefight the shelden. If something rive the pansy then the pansy rive the dea. If the pansy prizefight the shelden then the pansy englut the shelden. If something is menial and it rive the ferinand then it is racy. If something rive the pansy and the pansy englut the dea then the pansy is figurative. If the ferinand prizefight the shelden and the ferinand rive the pansy then the ferinand is knockabout. The pansy is not racy.", "logic": "\nEnglut(dea, pansy)\nPrizefight(dea, ferinand)\nUnfertile(ferinand)\nRive(ferinand, pansy)\nEnglut(ferinand, dea)\nPrizefight(ferinand, shelden)\nPrizefight(ferinand, pansy)\nKnockabout(shelden)\nMenial(shelden)\nEnglut(shelden, dea)\nEnglut(shelden, ferinand)\nPrizefight(shelden, ferinand)\nRive(pansy, shelden)\nEnglut(pansy, dea)\nPrizefight(pansy, ferinand)\nforall x (Rive(x, dea) -> Prizefight(x, shelden))\nforall x (Rive(x, pansy) -> Rive(pansy, dea))\nPrizefight(pansy, shelden) -> Englut(pansy, shelden)\nforall x (Menial(x) and Rive(x, ferinand) -> Racy(x))\nforall x (Rive(x, pansy) and Englut(pansy, dea) -> Figurative(pansy))\nPrizefight(ferinand, shelden) and Rive(ferinand, pansy) -> Knockabout(ferinand)\n\nnot Racy(pansy)\n\nforall x (Menial(x) and Rive(x, ferinand) -> Racy(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The dorri hare the wade. The dorri bastinado the leonelle. The leonelle is epileptic. The leonelle cram the wade. The leonelle hare the dorri. The leonelle bastinado the zarla. The leonelle bastinado the wade. The zarla is tipsy. The zarla is parous. The zarla hare the dorri. The zarla hare the leonelle. The zarla bastinado the leonelle. The wade cram the zarla. The wade hare the dorri. The wade bastinado the leonelle. If something cram the dorri then it bastinado the zarla. If something cram the wade then the wade cram the dorri. If the wade bastinado the zarla then the wade hare the zarla. If something is parous and it cram the leonelle then it is premature. If something cram the wade and the wade hare the dorri then the wade is insipid. If the leonelle bastinado the zarla and the leonelle cram the wade then the leonelle is tipsy. The zarla bastinado the zarla.", "logic": "\nHare(dorri, wade)\nBastinado(dorri, leonelle)\nEpileptic(leonelle)\nCram(leonelle, wade)\nHare(leonelle, dorri)\nBastinado(leonelle, zarla)\nBastinado(leonelle, wade)\nTipsy(zarla)\nParous(zarla)\nHare(zarla, dorri)\nHare(zarla, leonelle)\nBastinado(zarla, leonelle)\nCram(wade, zarla)\nHare(wade, dorri)\nBastinado(wade, leonelle)\nforall x (Cram(x, dorri) -> Bastinado(x, zarla))\nforall x (Cram(x, wade) -> Cram(wade, dorri))\nBastinado(wade, zarla) -> Hare(wade, zarla)\nforall x (Parous(x) and Cram(x, leonelle) -> Premature(x))\nforall x (Cram(x, wade) and Hare(wade, dorri) -> Insipid(wade))\nBastinado(leonelle, zarla) and Cram(leonelle, wade) -> Tipsy(leonelle)\n\nBastinado(zarla, zarla)\n\nforall x (Cram(x, dorri) -> Bastinado(x, zarla)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The chiarra syncopate the erica. The chiarra menace the jannel. The jannel is bacillar. The jannel straggle the erica. The jannel syncopate the chiarra. The jannel menace the kacie. The jannel menace the erica. The kacie is conjunct. The kacie is bouldery. The kacie syncopate the chiarra. The kacie syncopate the jannel. The kacie menace the jannel. The erica straggle the kacie. The erica syncopate the chiarra. The erica menace the jannel. If something straggle the chiarra then it menace the kacie. If something straggle the erica then the erica straggle the chiarra. If the erica menace the kacie then the erica syncopate the kacie. If something is bouldery and it straggle the jannel then it is thievish. If something straggle the erica and the erica syncopate the chiarra then the erica is hollywood. If the jannel menace the kacie and the jannel straggle the erica then the jannel is conjunct. The kacie does not like the kacie.", "logic": "\nSyncopate(chiarra, erica)\nMenace(chiarra, jannel)\nBacillar(jannel)\nStraggle(jannel, erica)\nSyncopate(jannel, chiarra)\nMenace(jannel, kacie)\nMenace(jannel, erica)\nConjunct(kacie)\nBouldery(kacie)\nSyncopate(kacie, chiarra)\nSyncopate(kacie, jannel)\nMenace(kacie, jannel)\nStraggle(erica, kacie)\nSyncopate(erica, chiarra)\nMenace(erica, jannel)\nforall x (Straggle(x, chiarra) -> Menace(x, kacie))\nforall x (Straggle(x, erica) -> Straggle(erica, chiarra))\nMenace(erica, kacie) -> Syncopate(erica, kacie)\nforall x (Bouldery(x) and Straggle(x, jannel) -> Thievish(x))\nforall x (Straggle(x, erica) and Syncopate(erica, chiarra) -> Hollywood(erica))\nMenace(jannel, kacie) and Straggle(jannel, erica) -> Conjunct(jannel)\n\nnot Straggle(kacie, kacie)\n\nnot Straggle(kacie, kacie) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The rochell ladder the moore. The rochell guard the cynthie. The cynthie is sagacious. The cynthie shrine the moore. The cynthie ladder the rochell. The cynthie guard the mylo. The cynthie guard the moore. The mylo is uncoloured. The mylo is gelid. The mylo ladder the rochell. The mylo ladder the cynthie. The mylo guard the cynthie. The moore shrine the mylo. The moore ladder the rochell. The moore guard the cynthie. If something shrine the rochell then it guard the mylo. If something shrine the moore then the moore shrine the rochell. If the moore guard the mylo then the moore ladder the mylo. If something is gelid and it shrine the cynthie then it is preferred. If something shrine the moore and the moore ladder the rochell then the moore is sweetened. If the cynthie guard the mylo and the cynthie shrine the moore then the cynthie is uncoloured. The rochell shrine the moore.", "logic": "\nLadder(rochell, moore)\nGuard(rochell, cynthie)\nSagacious(cynthie)\nShrine(cynthie, moore)\nLadder(cynthie, rochell)\nGuard(cynthie, mylo)\nGuard(cynthie, moore)\nUncoloured(mylo)\nGelid(mylo)\nLadder(mylo, rochell)\nLadder(mylo, cynthie)\nGuard(mylo, cynthie)\nShrine(moore, mylo)\nLadder(moore, rochell)\nGuard(moore, cynthie)\nforall x (Shrine(x, rochell) -> Guard(x, mylo))\nforall x (Shrine(x, moore) -> Shrine(moore, rochell))\nGuard(moore, mylo) -> Ladder(moore, mylo)\nforall x (Gelid(x) and Shrine(x, cynthie) -> Preferred(x))\nforall x (Shrine(x, moore) and Ladder(moore, rochell) -> Sweetened(moore))\nGuard(cynthie, mylo) and Shrine(cynthie, moore) -> Uncoloured(cynthie)\n\nShrine(rochell, moore)\n\nShrine(rochell, moore) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The gordon caracole the aleda. The gordon libel the clyde. The clyde is anatomical. The clyde blink the aleda. The clyde caracole the gordon. The clyde libel the karly. The clyde libel the aleda. The karly is downwind. The karly is lobated. The karly caracole the gordon. The karly caracole the clyde. The karly libel the clyde. The aleda blink the karly. The aleda caracole the gordon. The aleda libel the clyde. If something blink the gordon then it libel the karly. If something blink the aleda then the aleda blink the gordon. If the aleda libel the karly then the aleda caracole the karly. If something is lobated and it blink the clyde then it is univocal. If something blink the aleda and the aleda caracole the gordon then the aleda is meltable. If the clyde libel the karly and the clyde blink the aleda then the clyde is downwind. The clyde does not like the gordon.", "logic": "\nCaracole(gordon, aleda)\nLibel(gordon, clyde)\nAnatomical(clyde)\nBlink(clyde, aleda)\nCaracole(clyde, gordon)\nLibel(clyde, karly)\nLibel(clyde, aleda)\nDownwind(karly)\nLobated(karly)\nCaracole(karly, gordon)\nCaracole(karly, clyde)\nLibel(karly, clyde)\nBlink(aleda, karly)\nCaracole(aleda, gordon)\nLibel(aleda, clyde)\nforall x (Blink(x, gordon) -> Libel(x, karly))\nforall x (Blink(x, aleda) -> Blink(aleda, gordon))\nLibel(aleda, karly) -> Caracole(aleda, karly)\nforall x (Lobated(x) and Blink(x, clyde) -> Univocal(x))\nforall x (Blink(x, aleda) and Caracole(aleda, gordon) -> Meltable(aleda))\nLibel(clyde, karly) and Blink(clyde, aleda) -> Downwind(clyde)\n\nnot Blink(clyde, gordon)\n\nnot Blink(clyde, gordon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The lowell envisage the kayley. The lowell rupture the fanya. The fanya is bothered. The fanya chunk the kayley. The fanya envisage the lowell. The fanya rupture the valentina. The fanya rupture the kayley. The valentina is frightful. The valentina is inexact. The valentina envisage the lowell. The valentina envisage the fanya. The valentina rupture the fanya. The kayley chunk the valentina. The kayley envisage the lowell. The kayley rupture the fanya. If something chunk the lowell then it rupture the valentina. If something chunk the kayley then the kayley chunk the lowell. If the kayley rupture the valentina then the kayley envisage the valentina. If something is inexact and it chunk the fanya then it is slavic. If something chunk the kayley and the kayley envisage the lowell then the kayley is wasteful. If the fanya rupture the valentina and the fanya chunk the kayley then the fanya is frightful. The valentina rupture the kayley.", "logic": "\nEnvisage(lowell, kayley)\nRupture(lowell, fanya)\nBothered(fanya)\nChunk(fanya, kayley)\nEnvisage(fanya, lowell)\nRupture(fanya, valentina)\nRupture(fanya, kayley)\nFrightful(valentina)\nInexact(valentina)\nEnvisage(valentina, lowell)\nEnvisage(valentina, fanya)\nRupture(valentina, fanya)\nChunk(kayley, valentina)\nEnvisage(kayley, lowell)\nRupture(kayley, fanya)\nforall x (Chunk(x, lowell) -> Rupture(x, valentina))\nforall x (Chunk(x, kayley) -> Chunk(kayley, lowell))\nRupture(kayley, valentina) -> Envisage(kayley, valentina)\nforall x (Inexact(x) and Chunk(x, fanya) -> Slavic(x))\nforall x (Chunk(x, kayley) and Envisage(kayley, lowell) -> Wasteful(kayley))\nRupture(fanya, valentina) and Chunk(fanya, kayley) -> Frightful(fanya)\n\nRupture(valentina, kayley)\n\nRupture(valentina, kayley) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1296"} {"premises": "The kali waul the demetra. The kali is inaudible. The kali defervesce the demetra. The kali maintain the armond. The demetra waul the ediva. The demetra waul the armond. The demetra is not northeast. The demetra maintain the kali. The demetra maintain the armond. The ediva defervesce the demetra. The armond waul the demetra. The armond is inaudible. The armond is labored. The armond is not achaean. The armond defervesce the ediva. The armond maintain the demetra. If someone waul the demetra then the demetra defervesce the ediva. If someone defervesce the kali then the kali is achaean. If someone defervesce the demetra then they are lilac. If someone is labored then they like the kali. If someone is achaean then they like the ediva. If the kali is not achaean and the kali does not eat the armond then the kali is not lilac. The ediva defervesce the demetra.", "logic": "\nWaul(kali, demetra)\nInaudible(kali)\nDefervesce(kali, demetra)\nMaintain(kali, armond)\nWaul(demetra, ediva)\nWaul(demetra, armond)\nnot Northeast(demetra)\nMaintain(demetra, kali)\nMaintain(demetra, armond)\nDefervesce(ediva, demetra)\nWaul(armond, demetra)\nInaudible(armond)\nLabored(armond)\nnot Achaean(armond)\nDefervesce(armond, ediva)\nMaintain(armond, demetra)\nforall x (Waul(x, demetra) -> Defervesce(demetra, ediva))\nforall x (Defervesce(x, kali) -> Achaean(kali))\nforall x (Defervesce(x, demetra) -> Lilac(x))\nforall x (Labored(x) -> Defervesce(x, kali))\nforall x (Achaean(x) -> Defervesce(x, ediva))\nnot Achaean(kali) and not Waul(kali, armond) -> not Lilac(kali)\n\nDefervesce(ediva, demetra)\n\ntherefore Defervesce(ediva, demetra)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The gunter steamer the jennee. The gunter is stimulated. The gunter velcro the jennee. The gunter fusillade the georgiana. The jennee steamer the son. The jennee steamer the georgiana. The jennee is not geologic. The jennee fusillade the gunter. The jennee fusillade the georgiana. The son velcro the jennee. The georgiana steamer the jennee. The georgiana is stimulated. The georgiana is validatory. The georgiana is not colored. The georgiana velcro the son. The georgiana fusillade the jennee. If someone steamer the jennee then the jennee velcro the son. If someone velcro the gunter then the gunter is colored. If someone velcro the jennee then they are quebecois. If someone is validatory then they like the gunter. If someone is colored then they like the son. If the gunter is not colored and the gunter does not eat the georgiana then the gunter is not quebecois. The georgiana is not stimulated.", "logic": "\nSteamer(gunter, jennee)\nStimulated(gunter)\nVelcro(gunter, jennee)\nFusillade(gunter, georgiana)\nSteamer(jennee, son)\nSteamer(jennee, georgiana)\nnot Geologic(jennee)\nFusillade(jennee, gunter)\nFusillade(jennee, georgiana)\nVelcro(son, jennee)\nSteamer(georgiana, jennee)\nStimulated(georgiana)\nValidatory(georgiana)\nnot Colored(georgiana)\nVelcro(georgiana, son)\nFusillade(georgiana, jennee)\nforall x (Steamer(x, jennee) -> Velcro(jennee, son))\nforall x (Velcro(x, gunter) -> Colored(gunter))\nforall x (Velcro(x, jennee) -> Quebecois(x))\nforall x (Validatory(x) -> Velcro(x, gunter))\nforall x (Colored(x) -> Velcro(x, son))\nnot Colored(gunter) and not Steamer(gunter, georgiana) -> not Quebecois(gunter)\n\nnot Stimulated(georgiana)\n\ntherefore Stimulated(georgiana)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The joletta shortlist the rustin. The joletta is effluent. The joletta wrick the rustin. The joletta deaden the gustaf. The rustin shortlist the lilla. The rustin shortlist the gustaf. The rustin is not experient. The rustin deaden the joletta. The rustin deaden the gustaf. The lilla wrick the rustin. The gustaf shortlist the rustin. The gustaf is effluent. The gustaf is blinking. The gustaf is not gawky. The gustaf wrick the lilla. The gustaf deaden the rustin. If someone shortlist the rustin then the rustin wrick the lilla. If someone wrick the joletta then the joletta is gawky. If someone wrick the rustin then they are bottomed. If someone is blinking then they like the joletta. If someone is gawky then they like the lilla. If the joletta is not gawky and the joletta does not eat the gustaf then the joletta is not bottomed. The joletta is bottomed.", "logic": "\nShortlist(joletta, rustin)\nEffluent(joletta)\nWrick(joletta, rustin)\nDeaden(joletta, gustaf)\nShortlist(rustin, lilla)\nShortlist(rustin, gustaf)\nnot Experient(rustin)\nDeaden(rustin, joletta)\nDeaden(rustin, gustaf)\nWrick(lilla, rustin)\nShortlist(gustaf, rustin)\nEffluent(gustaf)\nBlinking(gustaf)\nnot Gawky(gustaf)\nWrick(gustaf, lilla)\nDeaden(gustaf, rustin)\nforall x (Shortlist(x, rustin) -> Wrick(rustin, lilla))\nforall x (Wrick(x, joletta) -> Gawky(joletta))\nforall x (Wrick(x, rustin) -> Bottomed(x))\nforall x (Blinking(x) -> Wrick(x, joletta))\nforall x (Gawky(x) -> Wrick(x, lilla))\nnot Gawky(joletta) and not Shortlist(joletta, gustaf) -> not Bottomed(joletta)\n\nBottomed(joletta)\n\nWrick(joletta, rustin) and forall x (Wrick(x, rustin) -> Bottomed(x)) -> therefore Bottomed(joletta)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The tome cork the michelle. The tome is unwed. The tome resolve the michelle. The tome script the hagan. The michelle cork the kinna. The michelle cork the hagan. The michelle is not writhing. The michelle script the tome. The michelle script the hagan. The kinna resolve the michelle. The hagan cork the michelle. The hagan is unwed. The hagan is realized. The hagan is not sidelong. The hagan resolve the kinna. The hagan script the michelle. If someone cork the michelle then the michelle resolve the kinna. If someone resolve the tome then the tome is sidelong. If someone resolve the michelle then they are continuing. If someone is realized then they like the tome. If someone is sidelong then they like the kinna. If the tome is not sidelong and the tome does not eat the hagan then the tome is not continuing. The kinna is not continuing.", "logic": "\nCork(tome, michelle)\nUnwed(tome)\nResolve(tome, michelle)\nScript(tome, hagan)\nCork(michelle, kinna)\nCork(michelle, hagan)\nnot Writhing(michelle)\nScript(michelle, tome)\nScript(michelle, hagan)\nResolve(kinna, michelle)\nCork(hagan, michelle)\nUnwed(hagan)\nRealized(hagan)\nnot Sidelong(hagan)\nResolve(hagan, kinna)\nScript(hagan, michelle)\nforall x (Cork(x, michelle) -> Resolve(michelle, kinna))\nforall x (Resolve(x, tome) -> Sidelong(tome))\nforall x (Resolve(x, michelle) -> Continuing(x))\nforall x (Realized(x) -> Resolve(x, tome))\nforall x (Sidelong(x) -> Resolve(x, kinna))\nnot Sidelong(tome) and not Cork(tome, hagan) -> not Continuing(tome)\n\nnot Continuing(kinna)\n\nResolve(kinna, michelle) and forall x (Resolve(x, michelle) -> Continuing(x)) -> therefore Continuing(kinna)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The chere stand the kee. The chere is agitating. The chere incense the kee. The chere defraud the rollins. The kee stand the dillon. The kee stand the rollins. The kee is not overweight. The kee defraud the chere. The kee defraud the rollins. The dillon incense the kee. The rollins stand the kee. The rollins is agitating. The rollins is former. The rollins is not pretended. The rollins incense the dillon. The rollins defraud the kee. If someone stand the kee then the kee incense the dillon. If someone incense the chere then the chere is pretended. If someone incense the kee then they are unrelaxed. If someone is former then they like the chere. If someone is pretended then they like the dillon. If the chere is not pretended and the chere does not eat the rollins then the chere is not unrelaxed. The chere is pretended.", "logic": "\nStand(chere, kee)\nAgitating(chere)\nIncense(chere, kee)\nDefraud(chere, rollins)\nStand(kee, dillon)\nStand(kee, rollins)\nnot Overweight(kee)\nDefraud(kee, chere)\nDefraud(kee, rollins)\nIncense(dillon, kee)\nStand(rollins, kee)\nAgitating(rollins)\nFormer(rollins)\nnot Pretended(rollins)\nIncense(rollins, dillon)\nDefraud(rollins, kee)\nforall x (Stand(x, kee) -> Incense(kee, dillon))\nforall x (Incense(x, chere) -> Pretended(chere))\nforall x (Incense(x, kee) -> Unrelaxed(x))\nforall x (Former(x) -> Incense(x, chere))\nforall x (Pretended(x) -> Incense(x, dillon))\nnot Pretended(chere) and not Stand(chere, rollins) -> not Unrelaxed(chere)\n\nPretended(chere)\n\nFormer(rollins) and forall x (Former(x) -> Incense(x, chere)) -> therefore Incense(rollins, chere) Incense(rollins, chere) and forall x (Incense(x, chere) -> Pretended(chere)) -> therefore Pretended(chere)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The anselm overmaster the ingunna. The anselm is several. The anselm lucubrate the ingunna. The anselm enumerate the casandra. The ingunna overmaster the marleah. The ingunna overmaster the casandra. The ingunna is not shorn. The ingunna enumerate the anselm. The ingunna enumerate the casandra. The marleah lucubrate the ingunna. The casandra overmaster the ingunna. The casandra is several. The casandra is brummagem. The casandra is not monodic. The casandra lucubrate the marleah. The casandra enumerate the ingunna. If someone overmaster the ingunna then the ingunna lucubrate the marleah. If someone lucubrate the anselm then the anselm is monodic. If someone lucubrate the ingunna then they are formulaic. If someone is brummagem then they like the anselm. If someone is monodic then they like the marleah. If the anselm is not monodic and the anselm does not eat the casandra then the anselm is not formulaic. The anselm is not monodic.", "logic": "\nOvermaster(anselm, ingunna)\nSeveral(anselm)\nLucubrate(anselm, ingunna)\nEnumerate(anselm, casandra)\nOvermaster(ingunna, marleah)\nOvermaster(ingunna, casandra)\nnot Shorn(ingunna)\nEnumerate(ingunna, anselm)\nEnumerate(ingunna, casandra)\nLucubrate(marleah, ingunna)\nOvermaster(casandra, ingunna)\nSeveral(casandra)\nBrummagem(casandra)\nnot Monodic(casandra)\nLucubrate(casandra, marleah)\nEnumerate(casandra, ingunna)\nforall x (Overmaster(x, ingunna) -> Lucubrate(ingunna, marleah))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, anselm) -> Monodic(anselm))\nforall x (Lucubrate(x, ingunna) -> Formulaic(x))\nforall x (Brummagem(x) -> Lucubrate(x, anselm))\nforall x (Monodic(x) -> Lucubrate(x, marleah))\nnot Monodic(anselm) and not Overmaster(anselm, casandra) -> not Formulaic(anselm)\n\nnot Monodic(anselm)\n\nBrummagem(casandra) and forall x (Brummagem(x) -> Lucubrate(x, anselm)) -> therefore Lucubrate(casandra, anselm) Lucubrate(casandra, anselm) and forall x (Lucubrate(x, anselm) -> Monodic(anselm)) -> therefore Monodic(anselm)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The rozella inmarry the adger. The rozella is textured. The rozella blat the adger. The rozella doom the tybalt. The adger inmarry the seka. The adger inmarry the tybalt. The adger is not bruneian. The adger doom the rozella. The adger doom the tybalt. The seka blat the adger. The tybalt inmarry the adger. The tybalt is textured. The tybalt is hunched. The tybalt is not sanative. The tybalt blat the seka. The tybalt doom the adger. If someone inmarry the adger then the adger blat the seka. If someone blat the rozella then the rozella is sanative. If someone blat the adger then they are shuddering. If someone is hunched then they like the rozella. If someone is sanative then they like the seka. If the rozella is not sanative and the rozella does not eat the tybalt then the rozella is not shuddering. The rozella blat the seka.", "logic": "\nInmarry(rozella, adger)\nTextured(rozella)\nBlat(rozella, adger)\nDoom(rozella, tybalt)\nInmarry(adger, seka)\nInmarry(adger, tybalt)\nnot Bruneian(adger)\nDoom(adger, rozella)\nDoom(adger, tybalt)\nBlat(seka, adger)\nInmarry(tybalt, adger)\nTextured(tybalt)\nHunched(tybalt)\nnot Sanative(tybalt)\nBlat(tybalt, seka)\nDoom(tybalt, adger)\nforall x (Inmarry(x, adger) -> Blat(adger, seka))\nforall x (Blat(x, rozella) -> Sanative(rozella))\nforall x (Blat(x, adger) -> Shuddering(x))\nforall x (Hunched(x) -> Blat(x, rozella))\nforall x (Sanative(x) -> Blat(x, seka))\nnot Sanative(rozella) and not Inmarry(rozella, tybalt) -> not Shuddering(rozella)\n\nBlat(rozella, seka)\n\nHunched(tybalt) and forall x (Hunched(x) -> Blat(x, rozella)) -> therefore Blat(tybalt, rozella) Blat(tybalt, rozella) and forall x (Blat(x, rozella) -> Sanative(rozella)) -> therefore Sanative(rozella) Sanative(rozella) and forall x (Sanative(x) -> Blat(x, seka)) -> therefore Blat(rozella, seka)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The rea trek the jess. The rea is unfurrowed. The rea scrutinise the jess. The rea deafen the malva. The jess trek the miguela. The jess trek the malva. The jess is not federate. The jess deafen the rea. The jess deafen the malva. The miguela scrutinise the jess. The malva trek the jess. The malva is unfurrowed. The malva is tyrannous. The malva is not sizeable. The malva scrutinise the miguela. The malva deafen the jess. If someone trek the jess then the jess scrutinise the miguela. If someone scrutinise the rea then the rea is sizeable. If someone scrutinise the jess then they are debonnaire. If someone is tyrannous then they like the rea. If someone is sizeable then they like the miguela. If the rea is not sizeable and the rea does not eat the malva then the rea is not debonnaire. The rea does not like the miguela.", "logic": "\nTrek(rea, jess)\nUnfurrowed(rea)\nScrutinise(rea, jess)\nDeafen(rea, malva)\nTrek(jess, miguela)\nTrek(jess, malva)\nnot Federate(jess)\nDeafen(jess, rea)\nDeafen(jess, malva)\nScrutinise(miguela, jess)\nTrek(malva, jess)\nUnfurrowed(malva)\nTyrannous(malva)\nnot Sizeable(malva)\nScrutinise(malva, miguela)\nDeafen(malva, jess)\nforall x (Trek(x, jess) -> Scrutinise(jess, miguela))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, rea) -> Sizeable(rea))\nforall x (Scrutinise(x, jess) -> Debonnaire(x))\nforall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Scrutinise(x, rea))\nforall x (Sizeable(x) -> Scrutinise(x, miguela))\nnot Sizeable(rea) and not Trek(rea, malva) -> not Debonnaire(rea)\n\nnot Scrutinise(rea, miguela)\n\nTyrannous(malva) and forall x (Tyrannous(x) -> Scrutinise(x, rea)) -> therefore Scrutinise(malva, rea) Scrutinise(malva, rea) and forall x (Scrutinise(x, rea) -> Sizeable(rea)) -> therefore Sizeable(rea) Sizeable(rea) and forall x (Sizeable(x) -> Scrutinise(x, miguela)) -> therefore Scrutinise(rea, miguela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The deerdre inveigle the marieann. The deerdre is unnatural. The deerdre hiccough the marieann. The deerdre clam the marisa. The marieann inveigle the prudence. The marieann inveigle the marisa. The marieann is not stupid. The marieann clam the deerdre. The marieann clam the marisa. The prudence hiccough the marieann. The marisa inveigle the marieann. The marisa is unnatural. The marisa is unethical. The marisa is not dustlike. The marisa hiccough the prudence. The marisa clam the marieann. If someone inveigle the marieann then the marieann hiccough the prudence. If someone hiccough the deerdre then the deerdre is dustlike. If someone hiccough the marieann then they are inured. If someone is unethical then they like the deerdre. If someone is dustlike then they like the prudence. If the deerdre is not dustlike and the deerdre does not eat the marisa then the deerdre is not inured. The marieann does not like the deerdre.", "logic": "\nInveigle(deerdre, marieann)\nUnnatural(deerdre)\nHiccough(deerdre, marieann)\nClam(deerdre, marisa)\nInveigle(marieann, prudence)\nInveigle(marieann, marisa)\nnot Stupid(marieann)\nClam(marieann, deerdre)\nClam(marieann, marisa)\nHiccough(prudence, marieann)\nInveigle(marisa, marieann)\nUnnatural(marisa)\nUnethical(marisa)\nnot Dustlike(marisa)\nHiccough(marisa, prudence)\nClam(marisa, marieann)\nforall x (Inveigle(x, marieann) -> Hiccough(marieann, prudence))\nforall x (Hiccough(x, deerdre) -> Dustlike(deerdre))\nforall x (Hiccough(x, marieann) -> Inured(x))\nforall x (Unethical(x) -> Hiccough(x, deerdre))\nforall x (Dustlike(x) -> Hiccough(x, prudence))\nnot Dustlike(deerdre) and not Inveigle(deerdre, marisa) -> not Inured(deerdre)\n\nnot Hiccough(marieann, deerdre)\n\nforall x (Unethical(x) -> Hiccough(x, deerdre)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The engracia bedazzle the andrej. The engracia is counter. The engracia resinate the andrej. The engracia housebreak the charmain. The andrej bedazzle the harvard. The andrej bedazzle the charmain. The andrej is not reversive. The andrej housebreak the engracia. The andrej housebreak the charmain. The harvard resinate the andrej. The charmain bedazzle the andrej. The charmain is counter. The charmain is aciduric. The charmain is not toxicant. The charmain resinate the harvard. The charmain housebreak the andrej. If someone bedazzle the andrej then the andrej resinate the harvard. If someone resinate the engracia then the engracia is toxicant. If someone resinate the andrej then they are amyloid. If someone is aciduric then they like the engracia. If someone is toxicant then they like the harvard. If the engracia is not toxicant and the engracia does not eat the charmain then the engracia is not amyloid. The harvard resinate the harvard.", "logic": "\nBedazzle(engracia, andrej)\nCounter(engracia)\nResinate(engracia, andrej)\nHousebreak(engracia, charmain)\nBedazzle(andrej, harvard)\nBedazzle(andrej, charmain)\nnot Reversive(andrej)\nHousebreak(andrej, engracia)\nHousebreak(andrej, charmain)\nResinate(harvard, andrej)\nBedazzle(charmain, andrej)\nCounter(charmain)\nAciduric(charmain)\nnot Toxicant(charmain)\nResinate(charmain, harvard)\nHousebreak(charmain, andrej)\nforall x (Bedazzle(x, andrej) -> Resinate(andrej, harvard))\nforall x (Resinate(x, engracia) -> Toxicant(engracia))\nforall x (Resinate(x, andrej) -> Amyloid(x))\nforall x (Aciduric(x) -> Resinate(x, engracia))\nforall x (Toxicant(x) -> Resinate(x, harvard))\nnot Toxicant(engracia) and not Bedazzle(engracia, charmain) -> not Amyloid(engracia)\n\nResinate(harvard, harvard)\n\nforall x (Toxicant(x) -> Resinate(x, harvard)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The bart consult the odie. The bart is perplexed. The bart beatify the odie. The bart evert the kizzee. The odie consult the trace. The odie consult the kizzee. The odie is not rapt. The odie evert the bart. The odie evert the kizzee. The trace beatify the odie. The kizzee consult the odie. The kizzee is perplexed. The kizzee is piercing. The kizzee is not dropsical. The kizzee beatify the trace. The kizzee evert the odie. If someone consult the odie then the odie beatify the trace. If someone beatify the bart then the bart is dropsical. If someone beatify the odie then they are vile. If someone is piercing then they like the bart. If someone is dropsical then they like the trace. If the bart is not dropsical and the bart does not eat the kizzee then the bart is not vile. The trace does not like the bart.", "logic": "\nConsult(bart, odie)\nPerplexed(bart)\nBeatify(bart, odie)\nEvert(bart, kizzee)\nConsult(odie, trace)\nConsult(odie, kizzee)\nnot Rapt(odie)\nEvert(odie, bart)\nEvert(odie, kizzee)\nBeatify(trace, odie)\nConsult(kizzee, odie)\nPerplexed(kizzee)\nPiercing(kizzee)\nnot Dropsical(kizzee)\nBeatify(kizzee, trace)\nEvert(kizzee, odie)\nforall x (Consult(x, odie) -> Beatify(odie, trace))\nforall x (Beatify(x, bart) -> Dropsical(bart))\nforall x (Beatify(x, odie) -> Vile(x))\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Beatify(x, bart))\nforall x (Dropsical(x) -> Beatify(x, trace))\nnot Dropsical(bart) and not Consult(bart, kizzee) -> not Vile(bart)\n\nnot Beatify(trace, bart)\n\nforall x (Piercing(x) -> Beatify(x, bart)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The essie move the jonis. The essie is mawkish. The essie chap the jonis. The essie conjugate the jimmie. The jonis move the amie. The jonis move the jimmie. The jonis is not surpliced. The jonis conjugate the essie. The jonis conjugate the jimmie. The amie chap the jonis. The jimmie move the jonis. The jimmie is mawkish. The jimmie is ingenuous. The jimmie is not filmed. The jimmie chap the amie. The jimmie conjugate the jonis. If someone move the jonis then the jonis chap the amie. If someone chap the essie then the essie is filmed. If someone chap the jonis then they are koranic. If someone is ingenuous then they like the essie. If someone is filmed then they like the amie. If the essie is not filmed and the essie does not eat the jimmie then the essie is not koranic. The jimmie is koranic.", "logic": "\nMove(essie, jonis)\nMawkish(essie)\nChap(essie, jonis)\nConjugate(essie, jimmie)\nMove(jonis, amie)\nMove(jonis, jimmie)\nnot Surpliced(jonis)\nConjugate(jonis, essie)\nConjugate(jonis, jimmie)\nChap(amie, jonis)\nMove(jimmie, jonis)\nMawkish(jimmie)\nIngenuous(jimmie)\nnot Filmed(jimmie)\nChap(jimmie, amie)\nConjugate(jimmie, jonis)\nforall x (Move(x, jonis) -> Chap(jonis, amie))\nforall x (Chap(x, essie) -> Filmed(essie))\nforall x (Chap(x, jonis) -> Koranic(x))\nforall x (Ingenuous(x) -> Chap(x, essie))\nforall x (Filmed(x) -> Chap(x, amie))\nnot Filmed(essie) and not Move(essie, jimmie) -> not Koranic(essie)\n\nKoranic(jimmie)\n\nforall x (Chap(x, jonis) -> Koranic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The gerhard besprinkle the cindy. The gerhard is unstained. The gerhard beshrew the cindy. The gerhard invalid the linus. The cindy besprinkle the norine. The cindy besprinkle the linus. The cindy is not ovine. The cindy invalid the gerhard. The cindy invalid the linus. The norine beshrew the cindy. The linus besprinkle the cindy. The linus is unstained. The linus is factual. The linus is not bicentric. The linus beshrew the norine. The linus invalid the cindy. If someone besprinkle the cindy then the cindy beshrew the norine. If someone beshrew the gerhard then the gerhard is bicentric. If someone beshrew the cindy then they are threepenny. If someone is factual then they like the gerhard. If someone is bicentric then they like the norine. If the gerhard is not bicentric and the gerhard does not eat the linus then the gerhard is not threepenny. The gerhard does not eat the gerhard.", "logic": "\nBesprinkle(gerhard, cindy)\nUnstained(gerhard)\nBeshrew(gerhard, cindy)\nInvalid(gerhard, linus)\nBesprinkle(cindy, norine)\nBesprinkle(cindy, linus)\nnot Ovine(cindy)\nInvalid(cindy, gerhard)\nInvalid(cindy, linus)\nBeshrew(norine, cindy)\nBesprinkle(linus, cindy)\nUnstained(linus)\nFactual(linus)\nnot Bicentric(linus)\nBeshrew(linus, norine)\nInvalid(linus, cindy)\nforall x (Besprinkle(x, cindy) -> Beshrew(cindy, norine))\nforall x (Beshrew(x, gerhard) -> Bicentric(gerhard))\nforall x (Beshrew(x, cindy) -> Threepenny(x))\nforall x (Factual(x) -> Beshrew(x, gerhard))\nforall x (Bicentric(x) -> Beshrew(x, norine))\nnot Bicentric(gerhard) and not Besprinkle(gerhard, linus) -> not Threepenny(gerhard)\n\nnot Besprinkle(gerhard, gerhard)\n\nnot Besprinkle(gerhard, gerhard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The willow opalize the olly. The willow is scurvy. The willow wrench the olly. The willow shrinkwrap the maire. The olly opalize the henri. The olly opalize the maire. The olly is not katabatic. The olly shrinkwrap the willow. The olly shrinkwrap the maire. The henri wrench the olly. The maire opalize the olly. The maire is scurvy. The maire is fingerlike. The maire is not straplike. The maire wrench the henri. The maire shrinkwrap the olly. If someone opalize the olly then the olly wrench the henri. If someone wrench the willow then the willow is straplike. If someone wrench the olly then they are crisp. If someone is fingerlike then they like the willow. If someone is straplike then they like the henri. If the willow is not straplike and the willow does not eat the maire then the willow is not crisp. The henri opalize the henri.", "logic": "\nOpalize(willow, olly)\nScurvy(willow)\nWrench(willow, olly)\nShrinkwrap(willow, maire)\nOpalize(olly, henri)\nOpalize(olly, maire)\nnot Katabatic(olly)\nShrinkwrap(olly, willow)\nShrinkwrap(olly, maire)\nWrench(henri, olly)\nOpalize(maire, olly)\nScurvy(maire)\nFingerlike(maire)\nnot Straplike(maire)\nWrench(maire, henri)\nShrinkwrap(maire, olly)\nforall x (Opalize(x, olly) -> Wrench(olly, henri))\nforall x (Wrench(x, willow) -> Straplike(willow))\nforall x (Wrench(x, olly) -> Crisp(x))\nforall x (Fingerlike(x) -> Wrench(x, willow))\nforall x (Straplike(x) -> Wrench(x, henri))\nnot Straplike(willow) and not Opalize(willow, maire) -> not Crisp(willow)\n\nOpalize(henri, henri)\n\nOpalize(henri, henri) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The fyodor backhand the rowena. The fyodor is raspy. The fyodor hood the rowena. The fyodor foment the victoria. The rowena backhand the estell. The rowena backhand the victoria. The rowena is not erose. The rowena foment the fyodor. The rowena foment the victoria. The estell hood the rowena. The victoria backhand the rowena. The victoria is raspy. The victoria is especial. The victoria is not convenient. The victoria hood the estell. The victoria foment the rowena. If someone backhand the rowena then the rowena hood the estell. If someone hood the fyodor then the fyodor is convenient. If someone hood the rowena then they are warty. If someone is especial then they like the fyodor. If someone is convenient then they like the estell. If the fyodor is not convenient and the fyodor does not eat the victoria then the fyodor is not warty. The estell does not eat the rowena.", "logic": "\nBackhand(fyodor, rowena)\nRaspy(fyodor)\nHood(fyodor, rowena)\nFoment(fyodor, victoria)\nBackhand(rowena, estell)\nBackhand(rowena, victoria)\nnot Erose(rowena)\nFoment(rowena, fyodor)\nFoment(rowena, victoria)\nHood(estell, rowena)\nBackhand(victoria, rowena)\nRaspy(victoria)\nEspecial(victoria)\nnot Convenient(victoria)\nHood(victoria, estell)\nFoment(victoria, rowena)\nforall x (Backhand(x, rowena) -> Hood(rowena, estell))\nforall x (Hood(x, fyodor) -> Convenient(fyodor))\nforall x (Hood(x, rowena) -> Warty(x))\nforall x (Especial(x) -> Hood(x, fyodor))\nforall x (Convenient(x) -> Hood(x, estell))\nnot Convenient(fyodor) and not Backhand(fyodor, victoria) -> not Warty(fyodor)\n\nnot Backhand(estell, rowena)\n\nnot Backhand(estell, rowena) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "The genia horrify the damien. The genia is adrenergic. The genia prise the damien. The genia sandblast the walton. The damien horrify the ulysses. The damien horrify the walton. The damien is not curly. The damien sandblast the genia. The damien sandblast the walton. The ulysses prise the damien. The walton horrify the damien. The walton is adrenergic. The walton is generative. The walton is not ambulacral. The walton prise the ulysses. The walton sandblast the damien. If someone horrify the damien then the damien prise the ulysses. If someone prise the genia then the genia is ambulacral. If someone prise the damien then they are uncoupled. If someone is generative then they like the genia. If someone is ambulacral then they like the ulysses. If the genia is not ambulacral and the genia does not eat the walton then the genia is not uncoupled. The ulysses is ambulacral.", "logic": "\nHorrify(genia, damien)\nAdrenergic(genia)\nPrise(genia, damien)\nSandblast(genia, walton)\nHorrify(damien, ulysses)\nHorrify(damien, walton)\nnot Curly(damien)\nSandblast(damien, genia)\nSandblast(damien, walton)\nPrise(ulysses, damien)\nHorrify(walton, damien)\nAdrenergic(walton)\nGenerative(walton)\nnot Ambulacral(walton)\nPrise(walton, ulysses)\nSandblast(walton, damien)\nforall x (Horrify(x, damien) -> Prise(damien, ulysses))\nforall x (Prise(x, genia) -> Ambulacral(genia))\nforall x (Prise(x, damien) -> Uncoupled(x))\nforall x (Generative(x) -> Prise(x, genia))\nforall x (Ambulacral(x) -> Prise(x, ulysses))\nnot Ambulacral(genia) and not Horrify(genia, walton) -> not Uncoupled(genia)\n\nAmbulacral(ulysses)\n\nAmbulacral(ulysses) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D3-702"} {"premises": "Laurence is estival. Laurence is extensive. Laurence is buirdly. Laurence is bicornate. Laurence is nucleated. Della is extensive. Della is buirdly. Della is nucleated. August is estival. August is thyroid. August is colorful. August is extensive. August is bicornate. August is nucleated. Arlette is estival. Arlette is bicornate. Cold people are nucleated. Red people are bicornate. All thyroid, bicornate people are estival. If Arlette is nucleated then Arlette is buirdly. If August is extensive and August is estival then August is colorful. Rough people are buirdly. All buirdly people are extensive. Rough, nucleated people are buirdly. August is colorful.", "logic": "\nEstival(laurence)\nExtensive(laurence)\nBuirdly(laurence)\nBicornate(laurence)\nNucleated(laurence)\nExtensive(della)\nBuirdly(della)\nNucleated(della)\nEstival(august)\nThyroid(august)\nColorful(august)\nExtensive(august)\nBicornate(august)\nNucleated(august)\nEstival(arlette)\nBicornate(arlette)\nforall x (Colorful(x) -> Nucleated(x))\nforall x (Buirdly(x) -> Bicornate(x))\nforall x (Thyroid(x) and Bicornate(x) -> Estival(x))\nNucleated(arlette) -> Buirdly(arlette)\nExtensive(august) and Estival(august) -> Colorful(august)\nforall x (Bicornate(x) -> Buirdly(x))\nforall x (Buirdly(x) -> Extensive(x))\nforall x (Bicornate(x) and Nucleated(x) -> Buirdly(x))\n\nColorful(august)\n\ntherefore Colorful(august)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "Romain is paternal. Romain is polyploid. Romain is lyonnaise. Romain is unaffected. Romain is applicable. Ronen is polyploid. Ronen is lyonnaise. Ronen is applicable. Daisi is paternal. Daisi is unheeded. Daisi is here. Daisi is polyploid. Daisi is unaffected. Daisi is applicable. Arliene is paternal. Arliene is unaffected. Cold people are applicable. Red people are unaffected. All unheeded, unaffected people are paternal. If Arliene is applicable then Arliene is lyonnaise. If Daisi is polyploid and Daisi is paternal then Daisi is here. Rough people are lyonnaise. All lyonnaise people are polyploid. Rough, applicable people are lyonnaise. Daisi is not here.", "logic": "\nPaternal(romain)\nPolyploid(romain)\nLyonnaise(romain)\nUnaffected(romain)\nApplicable(romain)\nPolyploid(ronen)\nLyonnaise(ronen)\nApplicable(ronen)\nPaternal(daisi)\nUnheeded(daisi)\nHere(daisi)\nPolyploid(daisi)\nUnaffected(daisi)\nApplicable(daisi)\nPaternal(arliene)\nUnaffected(arliene)\nforall x (Here(x) -> Applicable(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) -> Unaffected(x))\nforall x (Unheeded(x) and Unaffected(x) -> Paternal(x))\nApplicable(arliene) -> Lyonnaise(arliene)\nPolyploid(daisi) and Paternal(daisi) -> Here(daisi)\nforall x (Unaffected(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\nforall x (Lyonnaise(x) -> Polyploid(x))\nforall x (Unaffected(x) and Applicable(x) -> Lyonnaise(x))\n\nnot Here(daisi)\n\ntherefore Here(daisi)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "Wesley is syncretic. Wesley is braggy. Wesley is stippled. Wesley is alienating. Wesley is phrenic. Fancie is braggy. Fancie is stippled. Fancie is phrenic. Waldo is syncretic. Waldo is motional. Waldo is uppish. Waldo is braggy. Waldo is alienating. Waldo is phrenic. Martita is syncretic. Martita is alienating. Cold people are phrenic. Red people are alienating. All motional, alienating people are syncretic. If Martita is phrenic then Martita is stippled. If Waldo is braggy and Waldo is syncretic then Waldo is uppish. Rough people are stippled. All stippled people are braggy. Rough, phrenic people are stippled. Martita is not phrenic.", "logic": "\nSyncretic(wesley)\nBraggy(wesley)\nStippled(wesley)\nAlienating(wesley)\nPhrenic(wesley)\nBraggy(fancie)\nStippled(fancie)\nPhrenic(fancie)\nSyncretic(waldo)\nMotional(waldo)\nUppish(waldo)\nBraggy(waldo)\nAlienating(waldo)\nPhrenic(waldo)\nSyncretic(martita)\nAlienating(martita)\nforall x (Uppish(x) -> Phrenic(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Alienating(x))\nforall x (Motional(x) and Alienating(x) -> Syncretic(x))\nPhrenic(martita) -> Stippled(martita)\nBraggy(waldo) and Syncretic(waldo) -> Uppish(waldo)\nforall x (Alienating(x) -> Stippled(x))\nforall x (Stippled(x) -> Braggy(x))\nforall x (Alienating(x) and Phrenic(x) -> Stippled(x))\n\nnot Phrenic(martita)\n\nforall x (Uppish(x) -> Phrenic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "Oona is southward. Oona is spotless. Oona is precooled. Oona is suitable. Oona is resilient. Boris is spotless. Boris is precooled. Boris is resilient. Gladis is southward. Gladis is freckled. Gladis is animal. Gladis is spotless. Gladis is suitable. Gladis is resilient. Nunzio is southward. Nunzio is suitable. Cold people are resilient. Red people are suitable. All freckled, suitable people are southward. If Nunzio is resilient then Nunzio is precooled. If Gladis is spotless and Gladis is southward then Gladis is animal. Rough people are precooled. All precooled people are spotless. Rough, resilient people are precooled. Oona is freckled.", "logic": "\nSouthward(oona)\nSpotless(oona)\nPrecooled(oona)\nSuitable(oona)\nResilient(oona)\nSpotless(boris)\nPrecooled(boris)\nResilient(boris)\nSouthward(gladis)\nFreckled(gladis)\nAnimal(gladis)\nSpotless(gladis)\nSuitable(gladis)\nResilient(gladis)\nSouthward(nunzio)\nSuitable(nunzio)\nforall x (Animal(x) -> Resilient(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) -> Suitable(x))\nforall x (Freckled(x) and Suitable(x) -> Southward(x))\nResilient(nunzio) -> Precooled(nunzio)\nSpotless(gladis) and Southward(gladis) -> Animal(gladis)\nforall x (Suitable(x) -> Precooled(x))\nforall x (Precooled(x) -> Spotless(x))\nforall x (Suitable(x) and Resilient(x) -> Precooled(x))\n\nFreckled(oona)\n\nFreckled(oona) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D0-3672"} {"premises": "The dyann auscultate the raye. The dyann auscultate the rea. The dyann does not visit the rozalin. The raye stigmatise the rozalin. The rea burst the rozalin. The rozalin stigmatise the dyann. The rozalin does not chase the raye. If something burst the rea then it is not corporeal. The dyann auscultate the raye.", "logic": "\nAuscultate(dyann, raye)\nAuscultate(dyann, rea)\nnot Burst(dyann, rozalin)\nStigmatise(raye, rozalin)\nBurst(rea, rozalin)\nStigmatise(rozalin, dyann)\nnot Stigmatise(rozalin, raye)\nforall x (Burst(x, rea) -> not Corporeal(x))\n\nAuscultate(dyann, raye)\n\ntherefore Auscultate(dyann, raye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-402"} {"premises": "The sadella rephrase the laina. The sadella rephrase the rea. The sadella does not visit the gene. The laina line the gene. The rea alert the gene. The gene line the sadella. The gene does not chase the laina. If something alert the rea then it is not headed. The gene does not chase the sadella.", "logic": "\nRephrase(sadella, laina)\nRephrase(sadella, rea)\nnot Alert(sadella, gene)\nLine(laina, gene)\nAlert(rea, gene)\nLine(gene, sadella)\nnot Line(gene, laina)\nforall x (Alert(x, rea) -> not Headed(x))\n\nnot Line(gene, sadella)\n\ntherefore Line(gene, sadella)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-402"} {"premises": "The freemon muckrake the jeane. The freemon muckrake the krishna. The freemon does not visit the nannie. The jeane cadge the nannie. The krishna trouble the nannie. The nannie cadge the freemon. The nannie does not chase the jeane. If something trouble the krishna then it is not panicky. The jeane does not chase the freemon.", "logic": "\nMuckrake(freemon, jeane)\nMuckrake(freemon, krishna)\nnot Trouble(freemon, nannie)\nCadge(jeane, nannie)\nTrouble(krishna, nannie)\nCadge(nannie, freemon)\nnot Cadge(nannie, jeane)\nforall x (Trouble(x, krishna) -> not Panicky(x))\n\nnot Cadge(jeane, freemon)\n\nnot Cadge(jeane, freemon) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-402"} {"premises": "The hillard fumble the ketty. The hillard fumble the gabe. The hillard does not visit the kaylyn. The ketty evidence the kaylyn. The gabe team the kaylyn. The kaylyn evidence the hillard. The kaylyn does not chase the ketty. If something team the gabe then it is not supposable. The hillard is kind.", "logic": "\nFumble(hillard, ketty)\nFumble(hillard, gabe)\nnot Team(hillard, kaylyn)\nEvidence(ketty, kaylyn)\nTeam(gabe, kaylyn)\nEvidence(kaylyn, hillard)\nnot Evidence(kaylyn, ketty)\nforall x (Team(x, gabe) -> not Supposable(x))\n\nKind(hillard)\n\nKind(hillard) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNeg-OWA-D0-402"} {"premises": "The florenza ammoniate the osborne. The osborne rally the florenza. The osborne is awny. The osborne is springless. The osborne is fungoid. The sheba is springless. The sheba is tripinnate. If something rally the florenza and it is awny then the florenza nark the osborne. If something rally the florenza then the florenza is springless. If something nark the osborne then the osborne ammoniate the florenza. If something ammoniate the sheba then the sheba rally the osborne. If something nark the osborne then the osborne nark the sheba. If the florenza nark the sheba then the florenza is tripinnate. If something ammoniate the osborne and the osborne is awny then the osborne is fungoid. If something is tripinnate and it nark the florenza then it rally the florenza. The osborne is springless.", "logic": "\nAmmoniate(florenza, osborne)\nRally(osborne, florenza)\nAwny(osborne)\nSpringless(osborne)\nFungoid(osborne)\nSpringless(sheba)\nTripinnate(sheba)\nforall x (Rally(x, florenza) and Awny(x) -> Nark(florenza, osborne))\nforall x (Rally(x, florenza) -> Springless(florenza))\nforall x (Nark(x, osborne) -> Ammoniate(osborne, florenza))\nforall x (Ammoniate(x, sheba) -> Rally(sheba, osborne))\nforall x (Nark(x, osborne) -> Nark(osborne, sheba))\nNark(florenza, sheba) -> Tripinnate(florenza)\nforall x (Ammoniate(x, osborne) and Awny(osborne) -> Fungoid(osborne))\nforall x (Tripinnate(x) and Nark(x, florenza) -> Rally(x, florenza))\n\nSpringless(osborne)\n\ntherefore Springless(osborne)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "The anurag clasp the lyndell. The lyndell nutrify the anurag. The lyndell is courtly. The lyndell is lipotropic. The lyndell is stingy. The rosanne is lipotropic. The rosanne is unbanded. If something nutrify the anurag and it is courtly then the anurag jive the lyndell. If something nutrify the anurag then the anurag is lipotropic. If something jive the lyndell then the lyndell clasp the anurag. If something clasp the rosanne then the rosanne nutrify the lyndell. If something jive the lyndell then the lyndell jive the rosanne. If the anurag jive the rosanne then the anurag is unbanded. If something clasp the lyndell and the lyndell is courtly then the lyndell is stingy. If something is unbanded and it jive the anurag then it nutrify the anurag. The lyndell is not lipotropic.", "logic": "\nClasp(anurag, lyndell)\nNutrify(lyndell, anurag)\nCourtly(lyndell)\nLipotropic(lyndell)\nStingy(lyndell)\nLipotropic(rosanne)\nUnbanded(rosanne)\nforall x (Nutrify(x, anurag) and Courtly(x) -> Jive(anurag, lyndell))\nforall x (Nutrify(x, anurag) -> Lipotropic(anurag))\nforall x (Jive(x, lyndell) -> Clasp(lyndell, anurag))\nforall x (Clasp(x, rosanne) -> Nutrify(rosanne, lyndell))\nforall x (Jive(x, lyndell) -> Jive(lyndell, rosanne))\nJive(anurag, rosanne) -> Unbanded(anurag)\nforall x (Clasp(x, lyndell) and Courtly(lyndell) -> Stingy(lyndell))\nforall x (Unbanded(x) and Jive(x, anurag) -> Nutrify(x, anurag))\n\nnot Lipotropic(lyndell)\n\ntherefore Lipotropic(lyndell)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "The nathalie resume the ines. The ines ground the nathalie. The ines is jubilant. The ines is phosphoric. The ines is concentric. The danica is phosphoric. The danica is unbleached. If something ground the nathalie and it is jubilant then the nathalie repugn the ines. If something ground the nathalie then the nathalie is phosphoric. If something repugn the ines then the ines resume the nathalie. If something resume the danica then the danica ground the ines. If something repugn the ines then the ines repugn the danica. If the nathalie repugn the danica then the nathalie is unbleached. If something resume the ines and the ines is jubilant then the ines is concentric. If something is unbleached and it repugn the nathalie then it ground the nathalie. The nathalie is phosphoric.", "logic": "\nResume(nathalie, ines)\nGround(ines, nathalie)\nJubilant(ines)\nPhosphoric(ines)\nConcentric(ines)\nPhosphoric(danica)\nUnbleached(danica)\nforall x (Ground(x, nathalie) and Jubilant(x) -> Repugn(nathalie, ines))\nforall x (Ground(x, nathalie) -> Phosphoric(nathalie))\nforall x (Repugn(x, ines) -> Resume(ines, nathalie))\nforall x (Resume(x, danica) -> Ground(danica, ines))\nforall x (Repugn(x, ines) -> Repugn(ines, danica))\nRepugn(nathalie, danica) -> Unbleached(nathalie)\nforall x (Resume(x, ines) and Jubilant(ines) -> Concentric(ines))\nforall x (Unbleached(x) and Repugn(x, nathalie) -> Ground(x, nathalie))\n\nPhosphoric(nathalie)\n\nGround(ines, nathalie) and forall x (Ground(x, nathalie) -> Phosphoric(nathalie)) -> therefore Phosphoric(nathalie)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "The willmott walk the jermayne. The jermayne apotheose the willmott. The jermayne is hydrated. The jermayne is slummy. The jermayne is bleary. The johny is slummy. The johny is sonant. If something apotheose the willmott and it is hydrated then the willmott bait the jermayne. If something apotheose the willmott then the willmott is slummy. If something bait the jermayne then the jermayne walk the willmott. If something walk the johny then the johny apotheose the jermayne. If something bait the jermayne then the jermayne bait the johny. If the willmott bait the johny then the willmott is sonant. If something walk the jermayne and the jermayne is hydrated then the jermayne is bleary. If something is sonant and it bait the willmott then it apotheose the willmott. The willmott is not slummy.", "logic": "\nWalk(willmott, jermayne)\nApotheose(jermayne, willmott)\nHydrated(jermayne)\nSlummy(jermayne)\nBleary(jermayne)\nSlummy(johny)\nSonant(johny)\nforall x (Apotheose(x, willmott) and Hydrated(x) -> Bait(willmott, jermayne))\nforall x (Apotheose(x, willmott) -> Slummy(willmott))\nforall x (Bait(x, jermayne) -> Walk(jermayne, willmott))\nforall x (Walk(x, johny) -> Apotheose(johny, jermayne))\nforall x (Bait(x, jermayne) -> Bait(jermayne, johny))\nBait(willmott, johny) -> Sonant(willmott)\nforall x (Walk(x, jermayne) and Hydrated(jermayne) -> Bleary(jermayne))\nforall x (Sonant(x) and Bait(x, willmott) -> Apotheose(x, willmott))\n\nnot Slummy(willmott)\n\nApotheose(jermayne, willmott) and forall x (Apotheose(x, willmott) -> Slummy(willmott)) -> therefore Slummy(willmott)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "The linnie brace the beatriz. The beatriz brag the linnie. The beatriz is geologic. The beatriz is adjunct. The beatriz is oratorical. The margalit is adjunct. The margalit is timeworn. If something brag the linnie and it is geologic then the linnie wriggle the beatriz. If something brag the linnie then the linnie is adjunct. If something wriggle the beatriz then the beatriz brace the linnie. If something brace the margalit then the margalit brag the beatriz. If something wriggle the beatriz then the beatriz wriggle the margalit. If the linnie wriggle the margalit then the linnie is timeworn. If something brace the beatriz and the beatriz is geologic then the beatriz is oratorical. If something is timeworn and it wriggle the linnie then it brag the linnie. The linnie does not eat the linnie.", "logic": "\nBrace(linnie, beatriz)\nBrag(beatriz, linnie)\nGeologic(beatriz)\nAdjunct(beatriz)\nOratorical(beatriz)\nAdjunct(margalit)\nTimeworn(margalit)\nforall x (Brag(x, linnie) and Geologic(x) -> Wriggle(linnie, beatriz))\nforall x (Brag(x, linnie) -> Adjunct(linnie))\nforall x (Wriggle(x, beatriz) -> Brace(beatriz, linnie))\nforall x (Brace(x, margalit) -> Brag(margalit, beatriz))\nforall x (Wriggle(x, beatriz) -> Wriggle(beatriz, margalit))\nWriggle(linnie, margalit) -> Timeworn(linnie)\nforall x (Brace(x, beatriz) and Geologic(beatriz) -> Oratorical(beatriz))\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and Wriggle(x, linnie) -> Brag(x, linnie))\n\nnot Brag(linnie, linnie)\n\nforall x (Timeworn(x) and Wriggle(x, linnie) -> Brag(x, linnie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "The thea sway the zilvia. The zilvia optimize the thea. The zilvia is regimental. The zilvia is gouty. The zilvia is serrated. The charissa is gouty. The charissa is stainless. If something optimize the thea and it is regimental then the thea ting the zilvia. If something optimize the thea then the thea is gouty. If something ting the zilvia then the zilvia sway the thea. If something sway the charissa then the charissa optimize the zilvia. If something ting the zilvia then the zilvia ting the charissa. If the thea ting the charissa then the thea is stainless. If something sway the zilvia and the zilvia is regimental then the zilvia is serrated. If something is stainless and it ting the thea then it optimize the thea. The charissa optimize the thea.", "logic": "\nSway(thea, zilvia)\nOptimize(zilvia, thea)\nRegimental(zilvia)\nGouty(zilvia)\nSerrated(zilvia)\nGouty(charissa)\nStainless(charissa)\nforall x (Optimize(x, thea) and Regimental(x) -> Ting(thea, zilvia))\nforall x (Optimize(x, thea) -> Gouty(thea))\nforall x (Ting(x, zilvia) -> Sway(zilvia, thea))\nforall x (Sway(x, charissa) -> Optimize(charissa, zilvia))\nforall x (Ting(x, zilvia) -> Ting(zilvia, charissa))\nTing(thea, charissa) -> Stainless(thea)\nforall x (Sway(x, zilvia) and Regimental(zilvia) -> Serrated(zilvia))\nforall x (Stainless(x) and Ting(x, thea) -> Optimize(x, thea))\n\nOptimize(charissa, thea)\n\nforall x (Stainless(x) and Ting(x, thea) -> Optimize(x, thea)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "The marcela defrost the stefania. The stefania lyophilize the marcela. The stefania is judicable. The stefania is silenced. The stefania is biologic. The rory is silenced. The rory is marine. If something lyophilize the marcela and it is judicable then the marcela scamp the stefania. If something lyophilize the marcela then the marcela is silenced. If something scamp the stefania then the stefania defrost the marcela. If something defrost the rory then the rory lyophilize the stefania. If something scamp the stefania then the stefania scamp the rory. If the marcela scamp the rory then the marcela is marine. If something defrost the stefania and the stefania is judicable then the stefania is biologic. If something is marine and it scamp the marcela then it lyophilize the marcela. The rory does not see the stefania.", "logic": "\nDefrost(marcela, stefania)\nLyophilize(stefania, marcela)\nJudicable(stefania)\nSilenced(stefania)\nBiologic(stefania)\nSilenced(rory)\nMarine(rory)\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, marcela) and Judicable(x) -> Scamp(marcela, stefania))\nforall x (Lyophilize(x, marcela) -> Silenced(marcela))\nforall x (Scamp(x, stefania) -> Defrost(stefania, marcela))\nforall x (Defrost(x, rory) -> Lyophilize(rory, stefania))\nforall x (Scamp(x, stefania) -> Scamp(stefania, rory))\nScamp(marcela, rory) -> Marine(marcela)\nforall x (Defrost(x, stefania) and Judicable(stefania) -> Biologic(stefania))\nforall x (Marine(x) and Scamp(x, marcela) -> Lyophilize(x, marcela))\n\nnot Scamp(rory, stefania)\n\nnot Scamp(rory, stefania) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "The clinton reread the elberta. The elberta portend the clinton. The elberta is unrelieved. The elberta is pithy. The elberta is androgenic. The salomo is pithy. The salomo is allometric. If something portend the clinton and it is unrelieved then the clinton moan the elberta. If something portend the clinton then the clinton is pithy. If something moan the elberta then the elberta reread the clinton. If something reread the salomo then the salomo portend the elberta. If something moan the elberta then the elberta moan the salomo. If the clinton moan the salomo then the clinton is allometric. If something reread the elberta and the elberta is unrelieved then the elberta is androgenic. If something is allometric and it moan the clinton then it portend the clinton. The clinton portend the salomo.", "logic": "\nReread(clinton, elberta)\nPortend(elberta, clinton)\nUnrelieved(elberta)\nPithy(elberta)\nAndrogenic(elberta)\nPithy(salomo)\nAllometric(salomo)\nforall x (Portend(x, clinton) and Unrelieved(x) -> Moan(clinton, elberta))\nforall x (Portend(x, clinton) -> Pithy(clinton))\nforall x (Moan(x, elberta) -> Reread(elberta, clinton))\nforall x (Reread(x, salomo) -> Portend(salomo, elberta))\nforall x (Moan(x, elberta) -> Moan(elberta, salomo))\nMoan(clinton, salomo) -> Allometric(clinton)\nforall x (Reread(x, elberta) and Unrelieved(elberta) -> Androgenic(elberta))\nforall x (Allometric(x) and Moan(x, clinton) -> Portend(x, clinton))\n\nPortend(clinton, salomo)\n\nPortend(clinton, salomo) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D1-322"} {"premises": "Aldrich is pugnacious. Aldrich is discontent. Aldrich is sacral. Albatros is surpliced. Gayle is convolute. Ginni is surpliced. Ginni is sacral. All benzenoid, discontent people are sacral. All discontent people are benzenoid. All convolute, alacritous people are benzenoid. If someone is benzenoid and sacral then they are alacritous. If someone is discontent and sacral then they are benzenoid. If someone is alacritous then they are convolute. Aldrich is discontent.", "logic": "\nPugnacious(aldrich)\nDiscontent(aldrich)\nSacral(aldrich)\nSurpliced(albatros)\nConvolute(gayle)\nSurpliced(ginni)\nSacral(ginni)\nforall x (Benzenoid(x) and Discontent(x) -> Sacral(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Convolute(x) and Alacritous(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Benzenoid(x) and Sacral(x) -> Alacritous(x))\nforall x (Discontent(x) and Sacral(x) -> Benzenoid(x))\nforall x (Alacritous(x) -> Convolute(x))\n\nDiscontent(aldrich)\n\ntherefore Discontent(aldrich)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Selle is gathered. Selle is slurred. Selle is funded. Nela is sneaking. Gizela is plebeian. Marlie is sneaking. Marlie is funded. All eurasiatic, slurred people are funded. All slurred people are eurasiatic. All plebeian, saurian people are eurasiatic. If someone is eurasiatic and funded then they are saurian. If someone is slurred and funded then they are eurasiatic. If someone is saurian then they are plebeian. Gizela is not plebeian.", "logic": "\nGathered(selle)\nSlurred(selle)\nFunded(selle)\nSneaking(nela)\nPlebeian(gizela)\nSneaking(marlie)\nFunded(marlie)\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) and Slurred(x) -> Funded(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) -> Eurasiatic(x))\nforall x (Plebeian(x) and Saurian(x) -> Eurasiatic(x))\nforall x (Eurasiatic(x) and Funded(x) -> Saurian(x))\nforall x (Slurred(x) and Funded(x) -> Eurasiatic(x))\nforall x (Saurian(x) -> Plebeian(x))\n\nnot Plebeian(gizela)\n\ntherefore Plebeian(gizela)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Katee is regulatory. Katee is loquacious. Katee is central. Meryl is ictal. Christine is beardless. Bernie is ictal. Bernie is central. All primary, loquacious people are central. All loquacious people are primary. All beardless, bloodless people are primary. If someone is primary and central then they are bloodless. If someone is loquacious and central then they are primary. If someone is bloodless then they are beardless. Katee is primary.", "logic": "\nRegulatory(katee)\nLoquacious(katee)\nCentral(katee)\nIctal(meryl)\nBeardless(christine)\nIctal(bernie)\nCentral(bernie)\nforall x (Primary(x) and Loquacious(x) -> Central(x))\nforall x (Loquacious(x) -> Primary(x))\nforall x (Beardless(x) and Bloodless(x) -> Primary(x))\nforall x (Primary(x) and Central(x) -> Bloodless(x))\nforall x (Loquacious(x) and Central(x) -> Primary(x))\nforall x (Bloodless(x) -> Beardless(x))\n\nPrimary(katee)\n\nLoquacious(katee) and forall x (Loquacious(x) -> Primary(x)) -> therefore Primary(katee)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Bethena is overarm. Bethena is overstrung. Bethena is shameful. Ramona is redundant. Nahum is slav. Melinda is redundant. Melinda is shameful. All select, overstrung people are shameful. All overstrung people are select. All slav, liturgical people are select. If someone is select and shameful then they are liturgical. If someone is overstrung and shameful then they are select. If someone is liturgical then they are slav. Bethena is not select.", "logic": "\nOverarm(bethena)\nOverstrung(bethena)\nShameful(bethena)\nRedundant(ramona)\nSlav(nahum)\nRedundant(melinda)\nShameful(melinda)\nforall x (Select(x) and Overstrung(x) -> Shameful(x))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Slav(x) and Liturgical(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Select(x) and Shameful(x) -> Liturgical(x))\nforall x (Overstrung(x) and Shameful(x) -> Select(x))\nforall x (Liturgical(x) -> Slav(x))\n\nnot Select(bethena)\n\nOverstrung(bethena) and forall x (Overstrung(x) -> Select(x)) -> therefore Select(bethena)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Andres is pyknotic. Andres is shimmery. Andres is auricular. Agna is damnable. Nerty is unrivalled. Cliff is damnable. Cliff is auricular. All winless, shimmery people are auricular. All shimmery people are winless. All unrivalled, sown people are winless. If someone is winless and auricular then they are sown. If someone is shimmery and auricular then they are winless. If someone is sown then they are unrivalled. Andres is sown.", "logic": "\nPyknotic(andres)\nShimmery(andres)\nAuricular(andres)\nDamnable(agna)\nUnrivalled(nerty)\nDamnable(cliff)\nAuricular(cliff)\nforall x (Winless(x) and Shimmery(x) -> Auricular(x))\nforall x (Shimmery(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Unrivalled(x) and Sown(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Winless(x) and Auricular(x) -> Sown(x))\nforall x (Shimmery(x) and Auricular(x) -> Winless(x))\nforall x (Sown(x) -> Unrivalled(x))\n\nSown(andres)\n\nShimmery(andres) and forall x (Shimmery(x) -> Winless(x)) -> therefore Winless(andres) Winless(andres) and Auricular(andres) and forall x (Winless(x) and Auricular(x) -> Sown(x)) -> therefore Sown(andres)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Northrop is plumate. Northrop is evaporable. Northrop is spellbound. Teador is shaky. Vitia is localised. Indira is shaky. Indira is spellbound. All bicorn, evaporable people are spellbound. All evaporable people are bicorn. All localised, underhung people are bicorn. If someone is bicorn and spellbound then they are underhung. If someone is evaporable and spellbound then they are bicorn. If someone is underhung then they are localised. Northrop is not underhung.", "logic": "\nPlumate(northrop)\nEvaporable(northrop)\nSpellbound(northrop)\nShaky(teador)\nLocalised(vitia)\nShaky(indira)\nSpellbound(indira)\nforall x (Bicorn(x) and Evaporable(x) -> Spellbound(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) -> Bicorn(x))\nforall x (Localised(x) and Underhung(x) -> Bicorn(x))\nforall x (Bicorn(x) and Spellbound(x) -> Underhung(x))\nforall x (Evaporable(x) and Spellbound(x) -> Bicorn(x))\nforall x (Underhung(x) -> Localised(x))\n\nnot Underhung(northrop)\n\nEvaporable(northrop) and forall x (Evaporable(x) -> Bicorn(x)) -> therefore Bicorn(northrop) Bicorn(northrop) and Spellbound(northrop) and forall x (Bicorn(x) and Spellbound(x) -> Underhung(x)) -> therefore Underhung(northrop)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Emmye is fistulate. Emmye is glabrous. Emmye is cantonal. Karly is apostolic. Cecilla is puffy. Weston is apostolic. Weston is cantonal. All fuscous, glabrous people are cantonal. All glabrous people are fuscous. All puffy, turned people are fuscous. If someone is fuscous and cantonal then they are turned. If someone is glabrous and cantonal then they are fuscous. If someone is turned then they are puffy. Emmye is puffy.", "logic": "\nFistulate(emmye)\nGlabrous(emmye)\nCantonal(emmye)\nApostolic(karly)\nPuffy(cecilla)\nApostolic(weston)\nCantonal(weston)\nforall x (Fuscous(x) and Glabrous(x) -> Cantonal(x))\nforall x (Glabrous(x) -> Fuscous(x))\nforall x (Puffy(x) and Turned(x) -> Fuscous(x))\nforall x (Fuscous(x) and Cantonal(x) -> Turned(x))\nforall x (Glabrous(x) and Cantonal(x) -> Fuscous(x))\nforall x (Turned(x) -> Puffy(x))\n\nPuffy(emmye)\n\nGlabrous(emmye) and forall x (Glabrous(x) -> Fuscous(x)) -> therefore Fuscous(emmye) Fuscous(emmye) and Cantonal(emmye) and forall x (Fuscous(x) and Cantonal(x) -> Turned(x)) -> therefore Turned(emmye) Turned(emmye) and forall x (Turned(x) -> Puffy(x)) -> therefore Puffy(emmye)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Arne is atilt. Arne is converse. Arne is decayable. Nils is nonfat. Steffen is unethical. Prasad is nonfat. Prasad is decayable. All swift, converse people are decayable. All converse people are swift. All unethical, dexterous people are swift. If someone is swift and decayable then they are dexterous. If someone is converse and decayable then they are swift. If someone is dexterous then they are unethical. Arne is not unethical.", "logic": "\nAtilt(arne)\nConverse(arne)\nDecayable(arne)\nNonfat(nils)\nUnethical(steffen)\nNonfat(prasad)\nDecayable(prasad)\nforall x (Swift(x) and Converse(x) -> Decayable(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Unethical(x) and Dexterous(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Swift(x) and Decayable(x) -> Dexterous(x))\nforall x (Converse(x) and Decayable(x) -> Swift(x))\nforall x (Dexterous(x) -> Unethical(x))\n\nnot Unethical(arne)\n\nConverse(arne) and forall x (Converse(x) -> Swift(x)) -> therefore Swift(arne) Swift(arne) and Decayable(arne) and forall x (Swift(x) and Decayable(x) -> Dexterous(x)) -> therefore Dexterous(arne) Dexterous(arne) and forall x (Dexterous(x) -> Unethical(x)) -> therefore Unethical(arne)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Halie is desultory. Halie is tense. Halie is wholemeal. Hatty is hypoactive. Ajai is ataxic. Nico is hypoactive. Nico is wholemeal. All thousandth, tense people are wholemeal. All tense people are thousandth. All ataxic, urethral people are thousandth. If someone is thousandth and wholemeal then they are urethral. If someone is tense and wholemeal then they are thousandth. If someone is urethral then they are ataxic. Hatty is not thousandth.", "logic": "\nDesultory(halie)\nTense(halie)\nWholemeal(halie)\nHypoactive(hatty)\nAtaxic(ajai)\nHypoactive(nico)\nWholemeal(nico)\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Tense(x) -> Wholemeal(x))\nforall x (Tense(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Ataxic(x) and Urethral(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Thousandth(x) and Wholemeal(x) -> Urethral(x))\nforall x (Tense(x) and Wholemeal(x) -> Thousandth(x))\nforall x (Urethral(x) -> Ataxic(x))\n\nnot Thousandth(hatty)\n\nforall x (Ataxic(x) and Urethral(x) -> Thousandth(x)) <- forall x (Thousandth(x) and Wholemeal(x) -> Urethral(x)) <- forall x (Tense(x) -> Thousandth(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Seline is adynamic. Seline is structured. Seline is anile. Angela is roily. Celinka is insanitary. Tanner is roily. Tanner is anile. All fungous, structured people are anile. All structured people are fungous. All insanitary, magic people are fungous. If someone is fungous and anile then they are magic. If someone is structured and anile then they are fungous. If someone is magic then they are insanitary. Celinka is fungous.", "logic": "\nAdynamic(seline)\nStructured(seline)\nAnile(seline)\nRoily(angela)\nInsanitary(celinka)\nRoily(tanner)\nAnile(tanner)\nforall x (Fungous(x) and Structured(x) -> Anile(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) -> Fungous(x))\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Magic(x) -> Fungous(x))\nforall x (Fungous(x) and Anile(x) -> Magic(x))\nforall x (Structured(x) and Anile(x) -> Fungous(x))\nforall x (Magic(x) -> Insanitary(x))\n\nFungous(celinka)\n\nforall x (Insanitary(x) and Magic(x) -> Fungous(x)) <- forall x (Fungous(x) and Anile(x) -> Magic(x)) <- forall x (Structured(x) -> Fungous(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Eryn is hierarchic. Eryn is rousseauan. Eryn is blazing. Elnar is ungreased. Lawson is dour. Darien is ungreased. Darien is blazing. All artistic, rousseauan people are blazing. All rousseauan people are artistic. All dour, sleepless people are artistic. If someone is artistic and blazing then they are sleepless. If someone is rousseauan and blazing then they are artistic. If someone is sleepless then they are dour. Elnar is not dour.", "logic": "\nHierarchic(eryn)\nRousseauan(eryn)\nBlazing(eryn)\nUngreased(elnar)\nDour(lawson)\nUngreased(darien)\nBlazing(darien)\nforall x (Artistic(x) and Rousseauan(x) -> Blazing(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Dour(x) and Sleepless(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Artistic(x) and Blazing(x) -> Sleepless(x))\nforall x (Rousseauan(x) and Blazing(x) -> Artistic(x))\nforall x (Sleepless(x) -> Dour(x))\n\nnot Dour(elnar)\n\nforall x (Sleepless(x) -> Dour(x)) <- forall x (Artistic(x) and Blazing(x) -> Sleepless(x)) <- forall x (Rousseauan(x) -> Artistic(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Trevor is restive. Trevor is unangry. Trevor is excitant. Jarvis is aggregated. Morganne is satisfying. Willard is aggregated. Willard is excitant. All cyprinid, unangry people are excitant. All unangry people are cyprinid. All satisfying, drowsing people are cyprinid. If someone is cyprinid and excitant then they are drowsing. If someone is unangry and excitant then they are cyprinid. If someone is drowsing then they are satisfying. Jarvis is excitant.", "logic": "\nRestive(trevor)\nUnangry(trevor)\nExcitant(trevor)\nAggregated(jarvis)\nSatisfying(morganne)\nAggregated(willard)\nExcitant(willard)\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Unangry(x) -> Excitant(x))\nforall x (Unangry(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Satisfying(x) and Drowsing(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Excitant(x) -> Drowsing(x))\nforall x (Unangry(x) and Excitant(x) -> Cyprinid(x))\nforall x (Drowsing(x) -> Satisfying(x))\n\nExcitant(jarvis)\n\nforall x (Cyprinid(x) and Unangry(x) -> Excitant(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Ada is puzzled. Ada is twilled. Ada is lutheran. Henrik is insectan. Anica is lowbred. Joanne is insectan. Joanne is lutheran. All adnate, twilled people are lutheran. All twilled people are adnate. All lowbred, cranky people are adnate. If someone is adnate and lutheran then they are cranky. If someone is twilled and lutheran then they are adnate. If someone is cranky then they are lowbred. Henrik is not twilled.", "logic": "\nPuzzled(ada)\nTwilled(ada)\nLutheran(ada)\nInsectan(henrik)\nLowbred(anica)\nInsectan(joanne)\nLutheran(joanne)\nforall x (Adnate(x) and Twilled(x) -> Lutheran(x))\nforall x (Twilled(x) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Lowbred(x) and Cranky(x) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Adnate(x) and Lutheran(x) -> Cranky(x))\nforall x (Twilled(x) and Lutheran(x) -> Adnate(x))\nforall x (Cranky(x) -> Lowbred(x))\n\nnot Twilled(henrik)\n\nnot Twilled(henrik) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Dorotea is heated. Dorotea is festive. Dorotea is memorable. Mahala is unmerited. Celestine is comforted. Babara is unmerited. Babara is memorable. All schismatic, festive people are memorable. All festive people are schismatic. All comforted, regimental people are schismatic. If someone is schismatic and memorable then they are regimental. If someone is festive and memorable then they are schismatic. If someone is regimental then they are comforted. Celestine is festive.", "logic": "\nHeated(dorotea)\nFestive(dorotea)\nMemorable(dorotea)\nUnmerited(mahala)\nComforted(celestine)\nUnmerited(babara)\nMemorable(babara)\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and Festive(x) -> Memorable(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) -> Schismatic(x))\nforall x (Comforted(x) and Regimental(x) -> Schismatic(x))\nforall x (Schismatic(x) and Memorable(x) -> Regimental(x))\nforall x (Festive(x) and Memorable(x) -> Schismatic(x))\nforall x (Regimental(x) -> Comforted(x))\n\nFestive(celestine)\n\nFestive(celestine) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Husein is cantering. Husein is squabby. Husein is semitropic. Kendra is synergetic. Hamilton is norse. Vergil is synergetic. Vergil is semitropic. All numerous, squabby people are semitropic. All squabby people are numerous. All norse, lite people are numerous. If someone is numerous and semitropic then they are lite. If someone is squabby and semitropic then they are numerous. If someone is lite then they are norse. Hamilton is not synergetic.", "logic": "\nCantering(husein)\nSquabby(husein)\nSemitropic(husein)\nSynergetic(kendra)\nNorse(hamilton)\nSynergetic(vergil)\nSemitropic(vergil)\nforall x (Numerous(x) and Squabby(x) -> Semitropic(x))\nforall x (Squabby(x) -> Numerous(x))\nforall x (Norse(x) and Lite(x) -> Numerous(x))\nforall x (Numerous(x) and Semitropic(x) -> Lite(x))\nforall x (Squabby(x) and Semitropic(x) -> Numerous(x))\nforall x (Lite(x) -> Norse(x))\n\nnot Synergetic(hamilton)\n\nnot Synergetic(hamilton) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "Theodoric is spatial. Theodoric is wimpy. Theodoric is malay. Randolf is soundless. Imojean is savourless. Marijo is soundless. Marijo is malay. All insipid, wimpy people are malay. All wimpy people are insipid. All savourless, newfangled people are insipid. If someone is insipid and malay then they are newfangled. If someone is wimpy and malay then they are insipid. If someone is newfangled then they are savourless. Randolf is spatial.", "logic": "\nSpatial(theodoric)\nWimpy(theodoric)\nMalay(theodoric)\nSoundless(randolf)\nSavourless(imojean)\nSoundless(marijo)\nMalay(marijo)\nforall x (Insipid(x) and Wimpy(x) -> Malay(x))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) -> Insipid(x))\nforall x (Savourless(x) and Newfangled(x) -> Insipid(x))\nforall x (Insipid(x) and Malay(x) -> Newfangled(x))\nforall x (Wimpy(x) and Malay(x) -> Insipid(x))\nforall x (Newfangled(x) -> Savourless(x))\n\nSpatial(randolf)\n\nSpatial(randolf) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "AttNoneg-OWA-D3-802"} {"premises": "The annalise relieve the cordy. The annalise is cuboidal. The annalise is trusting. The annalise default the cordy. The annalise gainsay the cordy. The nena relieve the cordy. The nena default the cordy. The curtice relieve the annalise. The curtice relieve the nena. The curtice relieve the cordy. The curtice is cuboidal. The curtice default the nena. The curtice gainsay the nena. The cordy default the annalise. The cordy default the curtice. The cordy gainsay the annalise. If something default the annalise then it default the curtice. If something is controlled then it default the cordy. If the cordy gainsay the annalise then the cordy default the annalise. If the annalise is unrhymed and the annalise gainsay the cordy then the cordy default the nena. If something is trusting and it gainsay the curtice then it default the cordy. If something default the cordy then it gainsay the curtice. If something default the annalise then it is controlled. If something gainsay the cordy then it gainsay the nena. The annalise is trusting.", "logic": "\nRelieve(annalise, cordy)\nCuboidal(annalise)\nTrusting(annalise)\nDefault(annalise, cordy)\nGainsay(annalise, cordy)\nRelieve(nena, cordy)\nDefault(nena, cordy)\nRelieve(curtice, annalise)\nRelieve(curtice, nena)\nRelieve(curtice, cordy)\nCuboidal(curtice)\nDefault(curtice, nena)\nGainsay(curtice, nena)\nDefault(cordy, annalise)\nDefault(cordy, curtice)\nGainsay(cordy, annalise)\nforall x (Default(x, annalise) -> Default(x, curtice))\nforall x (Controlled(x) -> Default(x, cordy))\nGainsay(cordy, annalise) -> Default(cordy, annalise)\nUnrhymed(annalise) and Gainsay(annalise, cordy) -> Default(cordy, nena)\nforall x (Trusting(x) and Gainsay(x, curtice) -> Default(x, cordy))\nforall x (Default(x, cordy) -> Gainsay(x, curtice))\nforall x (Default(x, annalise) -> Controlled(x))\nforall x (Gainsay(x, cordy) -> Gainsay(x, nena))\n\nTrusting(annalise)\n\ntherefore Trusting(annalise)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 0, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The emera ferry the violette. The emera is perplexing. The emera is proactive. The emera daydream the violette. The emera mitigate the violette. The gabriella ferry the violette. The gabriella daydream the violette. The hogan ferry the emera. The hogan ferry the gabriella. The hogan ferry the violette. The hogan is perplexing. The hogan daydream the gabriella. The hogan mitigate the gabriella. The violette daydream the emera. The violette daydream the hogan. The violette mitigate the emera. If something daydream the emera then it daydream the hogan. If something is polynesian then it daydream the violette. If the violette mitigate the emera then the violette daydream the emera. If the emera is extended and the emera mitigate the violette then the violette daydream the gabriella. If something is proactive and it mitigate the hogan then it daydream the violette. If something daydream the violette then it mitigate the hogan. If something daydream the emera then it is polynesian. If something mitigate the violette then it mitigate the gabriella. The emera does not chase the violette.", "logic": "\nFerry(emera, violette)\nPerplexing(emera)\nProactive(emera)\nDaydream(emera, violette)\nMitigate(emera, violette)\nFerry(gabriella, violette)\nDaydream(gabriella, violette)\nFerry(hogan, emera)\nFerry(hogan, gabriella)\nFerry(hogan, violette)\nPerplexing(hogan)\nDaydream(hogan, gabriella)\nMitigate(hogan, gabriella)\nDaydream(violette, emera)\nDaydream(violette, hogan)\nMitigate(violette, emera)\nforall x (Daydream(x, emera) -> Daydream(x, hogan))\nforall x (Polynesian(x) -> Daydream(x, violette))\nMitigate(violette, emera) -> Daydream(violette, emera)\nExtended(emera) and Mitigate(emera, violette) -> Daydream(violette, gabriella)\nforall x (Proactive(x) and Mitigate(x, hogan) -> Daydream(x, violette))\nforall x (Daydream(x, violette) -> Mitigate(x, hogan))\nforall x (Daydream(x, emera) -> Polynesian(x))\nforall x (Mitigate(x, violette) -> Mitigate(x, gabriella))\n\nnot Ferry(emera, violette)\n\ntherefore Ferry(emera, violette)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 0, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The mable slink the hermina. The mable is spondaic. The mable is gastric. The mable oblige the hermina. The mable cogitate the hermina. The aurora slink the hermina. The aurora oblige the hermina. The oleg slink the mable. The oleg slink the aurora. The oleg slink the hermina. The oleg is spondaic. The oleg oblige the aurora. The oleg cogitate the aurora. The hermina oblige the mable. The hermina oblige the oleg. The hermina cogitate the mable. If something oblige the mable then it oblige the oleg. If something is womanly then it oblige the hermina. If the hermina cogitate the mable then the hermina oblige the mable. If the mable is blasted and the mable cogitate the hermina then the hermina oblige the aurora. If something is gastric and it cogitate the oleg then it oblige the hermina. If something oblige the hermina then it cogitate the oleg. If something oblige the mable then it is womanly. If something cogitate the hermina then it cogitate the aurora. The mable cogitate the oleg.", "logic": "\nSlink(mable, hermina)\nSpondaic(mable)\nGastric(mable)\nOblige(mable, hermina)\nCogitate(mable, hermina)\nSlink(aurora, hermina)\nOblige(aurora, hermina)\nSlink(oleg, mable)\nSlink(oleg, aurora)\nSlink(oleg, hermina)\nSpondaic(oleg)\nOblige(oleg, aurora)\nCogitate(oleg, aurora)\nOblige(hermina, mable)\nOblige(hermina, oleg)\nCogitate(hermina, mable)\nforall x (Oblige(x, mable) -> Oblige(x, oleg))\nforall x (Womanly(x) -> Oblige(x, hermina))\nCogitate(hermina, mable) -> Oblige(hermina, mable)\nBlasted(mable) and Cogitate(mable, hermina) -> Oblige(hermina, aurora)\nforall x (Gastric(x) and Cogitate(x, oleg) -> Oblige(x, hermina))\nforall x (Oblige(x, hermina) -> Cogitate(x, oleg))\nforall x (Oblige(x, mable) -> Womanly(x))\nforall x (Cogitate(x, hermina) -> Cogitate(x, aurora))\n\nCogitate(mable, oleg)\n\nOblige(mable, hermina) and forall x (Oblige(x, hermina) -> Cogitate(x, oleg)) -> therefore Cogitate(mable, oleg)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 1, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The neel hotfoot the desiri. The neel is uxorious. The neel is brushed. The neel shrinkwrap the desiri. The neel overwrite the desiri. The wyn hotfoot the desiri. The wyn shrinkwrap the desiri. The nevin hotfoot the neel. The nevin hotfoot the wyn. The nevin hotfoot the desiri. The nevin is uxorious. The nevin shrinkwrap the wyn. The nevin overwrite the wyn. The desiri shrinkwrap the neel. The desiri shrinkwrap the nevin. The desiri overwrite the neel. If something shrinkwrap the neel then it shrinkwrap the nevin. If something is throwback then it shrinkwrap the desiri. If the desiri overwrite the neel then the desiri shrinkwrap the neel. If the neel is hmong and the neel overwrite the desiri then the desiri shrinkwrap the wyn. If something is brushed and it overwrite the nevin then it shrinkwrap the desiri. If something shrinkwrap the desiri then it overwrite the nevin. If something shrinkwrap the neel then it is throwback. If something overwrite the desiri then it overwrite the wyn. The neel does not see the wyn.", "logic": "\nHotfoot(neel, desiri)\nUxorious(neel)\nBrushed(neel)\nShrinkwrap(neel, desiri)\nOverwrite(neel, desiri)\nHotfoot(wyn, desiri)\nShrinkwrap(wyn, desiri)\nHotfoot(nevin, neel)\nHotfoot(nevin, wyn)\nHotfoot(nevin, desiri)\nUxorious(nevin)\nShrinkwrap(nevin, wyn)\nOverwrite(nevin, wyn)\nShrinkwrap(desiri, neel)\nShrinkwrap(desiri, nevin)\nOverwrite(desiri, neel)\nforall x (Shrinkwrap(x, neel) -> Shrinkwrap(x, nevin))\nforall x (Throwback(x) -> Shrinkwrap(x, desiri))\nOverwrite(desiri, neel) -> Shrinkwrap(desiri, neel)\nHmong(neel) and Overwrite(neel, desiri) -> Shrinkwrap(desiri, wyn)\nforall x (Brushed(x) and Overwrite(x, nevin) -> Shrinkwrap(x, desiri))\nforall x (Shrinkwrap(x, desiri) -> Overwrite(x, nevin))\nforall x (Shrinkwrap(x, neel) -> Throwback(x))\nforall x (Overwrite(x, desiri) -> Overwrite(x, wyn))\n\nnot Overwrite(neel, wyn)\n\nOverwrite(neel, desiri) and forall x (Overwrite(x, desiri) -> Overwrite(x, wyn)) -> therefore Overwrite(neel, wyn)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 1, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The myke satirize the virgina. The myke is apheretic. The myke is syncarpous. The myke strut the virgina. The myke establish the virgina. The jephthah satirize the virgina. The jephthah strut the virgina. The leona satirize the myke. The leona satirize the jephthah. The leona satirize the virgina. The leona is apheretic. The leona strut the jephthah. The leona establish the jephthah. The virgina strut the myke. The virgina strut the leona. The virgina establish the myke. If something strut the myke then it strut the leona. If something is uncouth then it strut the virgina. If the virgina establish the myke then the virgina strut the myke. If the myke is voluntary and the myke establish the virgina then the virgina strut the jephthah. If something is syncarpous and it establish the leona then it strut the virgina. If something strut the virgina then it establish the leona. If something strut the myke then it is uncouth. If something establish the virgina then it establish the jephthah. The virgina strut the virgina.", "logic": "\nSatirize(myke, virgina)\nApheretic(myke)\nSyncarpous(myke)\nStrut(myke, virgina)\nEstablish(myke, virgina)\nSatirize(jephthah, virgina)\nStrut(jephthah, virgina)\nSatirize(leona, myke)\nSatirize(leona, jephthah)\nSatirize(leona, virgina)\nApheretic(leona)\nStrut(leona, jephthah)\nEstablish(leona, jephthah)\nStrut(virgina, myke)\nStrut(virgina, leona)\nEstablish(virgina, myke)\nforall x (Strut(x, myke) -> Strut(x, leona))\nforall x (Uncouth(x) -> Strut(x, virgina))\nEstablish(virgina, myke) -> Strut(virgina, myke)\nVoluntary(myke) and Establish(myke, virgina) -> Strut(virgina, jephthah)\nforall x (Syncarpous(x) and Establish(x, leona) -> Strut(x, virgina))\nforall x (Strut(x, virgina) -> Establish(x, leona))\nforall x (Strut(x, myke) -> Uncouth(x))\nforall x (Establish(x, virgina) -> Establish(x, jephthah))\n\nStrut(virgina, virgina)\n\nStrut(virgina, myke) and forall x (Strut(x, myke) -> Uncouth(x)) -> therefore Uncouth(virgina) Uncouth(virgina) and forall x (Uncouth(x) -> Strut(x, virgina)) -> therefore Strut(virgina, virgina)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 2, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The harald novelise the torr. The harald is banausic. The harald is frothy. The harald desalt the torr. The harald pledge the torr. The forster novelise the torr. The forster desalt the torr. The fionna novelise the harald. The fionna novelise the forster. The fionna novelise the torr. The fionna is banausic. The fionna desalt the forster. The fionna pledge the forster. The torr desalt the harald. The torr desalt the fionna. The torr pledge the harald. If something desalt the harald then it desalt the fionna. If something is celestial then it desalt the torr. If the torr pledge the harald then the torr desalt the harald. If the harald is adjusted and the harald pledge the torr then the torr desalt the forster. If something is frothy and it pledge the fionna then it desalt the torr. If something desalt the torr then it pledge the fionna. If something desalt the harald then it is celestial. If something pledge the torr then it pledge the forster. The torr does not need the torr.", "logic": "\nNovelise(harald, torr)\nBanausic(harald)\nFrothy(harald)\nDesalt(harald, torr)\nPledge(harald, torr)\nNovelise(forster, torr)\nDesalt(forster, torr)\nNovelise(fionna, harald)\nNovelise(fionna, forster)\nNovelise(fionna, torr)\nBanausic(fionna)\nDesalt(fionna, forster)\nPledge(fionna, forster)\nDesalt(torr, harald)\nDesalt(torr, fionna)\nPledge(torr, harald)\nforall x (Desalt(x, harald) -> Desalt(x, fionna))\nforall x (Celestial(x) -> Desalt(x, torr))\nPledge(torr, harald) -> Desalt(torr, harald)\nAdjusted(harald) and Pledge(harald, torr) -> Desalt(torr, forster)\nforall x (Frothy(x) and Pledge(x, fionna) -> Desalt(x, torr))\nforall x (Desalt(x, torr) -> Pledge(x, fionna))\nforall x (Desalt(x, harald) -> Celestial(x))\nforall x (Pledge(x, torr) -> Pledge(x, forster))\n\nnot Desalt(torr, torr)\n\nDesalt(torr, harald) and forall x (Desalt(x, harald) -> Celestial(x)) -> therefore Celestial(torr) Celestial(torr) and forall x (Celestial(x) -> Desalt(x, torr)) -> therefore Desalt(torr, torr)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 2, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The perla slight the lian. The perla is barbaric. The perla is saharan. The perla upheave the lian. The perla discipline the lian. The darsie slight the lian. The darsie upheave the lian. The elna slight the perla. The elna slight the darsie. The elna slight the lian. The elna is barbaric. The elna upheave the darsie. The elna discipline the darsie. The lian upheave the perla. The lian upheave the elna. The lian discipline the perla. If something upheave the perla then it upheave the elna. If something is burred then it upheave the lian. If the lian discipline the perla then the lian upheave the perla. If the perla is unswept and the perla discipline the lian then the lian upheave the darsie. If something is saharan and it discipline the elna then it upheave the lian. If something upheave the lian then it discipline the elna. If something upheave the perla then it is burred. If something discipline the lian then it discipline the darsie. The lian discipline the elna.", "logic": "\nSlight(perla, lian)\nBarbaric(perla)\nSaharan(perla)\nUpheave(perla, lian)\nDiscipline(perla, lian)\nSlight(darsie, lian)\nUpheave(darsie, lian)\nSlight(elna, perla)\nSlight(elna, darsie)\nSlight(elna, lian)\nBarbaric(elna)\nUpheave(elna, darsie)\nDiscipline(elna, darsie)\nUpheave(lian, perla)\nUpheave(lian, elna)\nDiscipline(lian, perla)\nforall x (Upheave(x, perla) -> Upheave(x, elna))\nforall x (Burred(x) -> Upheave(x, lian))\nDiscipline(lian, perla) -> Upheave(lian, perla)\nUnswept(perla) and Discipline(perla, lian) -> Upheave(lian, darsie)\nforall x (Saharan(x) and Discipline(x, elna) -> Upheave(x, lian))\nforall x (Upheave(x, lian) -> Discipline(x, elna))\nforall x (Upheave(x, perla) -> Burred(x))\nforall x (Discipline(x, lian) -> Discipline(x, darsie))\n\nDiscipline(lian, elna)\n\nUpheave(lian, perla) and forall x (Upheave(x, perla) -> Burred(x)) -> therefore Burred(lian) Burred(lian) and forall x (Burred(x) -> Upheave(x, lian)) -> therefore Upheave(lian, lian) Upheave(lian, lian) and forall x (Upheave(x, lian) -> Discipline(x, elna)) -> therefore Discipline(lian, elna)\n\nTrue", "qdep": 3, "answer": "True", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The oralie harbour the parker. The oralie is brilliant. The oralie is beaded. The oralie floss the parker. The oralie embellish the parker. The enriqueta harbour the parker. The enriqueta floss the parker. The marcie harbour the oralie. The marcie harbour the enriqueta. The marcie harbour the parker. The marcie is brilliant. The marcie floss the enriqueta. The marcie embellish the enriqueta. The parker floss the oralie. The parker floss the marcie. The parker embellish the oralie. If something floss the oralie then it floss the marcie. If something is superlunar then it floss the parker. If the parker embellish the oralie then the parker floss the oralie. If the oralie is fugacious and the oralie embellish the parker then the parker floss the enriqueta. If something is beaded and it embellish the marcie then it floss the parker. If something floss the parker then it embellish the marcie. If something floss the oralie then it is superlunar. If something embellish the parker then it embellish the enriqueta. The parker does not see the marcie.", "logic": "\nHarbour(oralie, parker)\nBrilliant(oralie)\nBeaded(oralie)\nFloss(oralie, parker)\nEmbellish(oralie, parker)\nHarbour(enriqueta, parker)\nFloss(enriqueta, parker)\nHarbour(marcie, oralie)\nHarbour(marcie, enriqueta)\nHarbour(marcie, parker)\nBrilliant(marcie)\nFloss(marcie, enriqueta)\nEmbellish(marcie, enriqueta)\nFloss(parker, oralie)\nFloss(parker, marcie)\nEmbellish(parker, oralie)\nforall x (Floss(x, oralie) -> Floss(x, marcie))\nforall x (Superlunar(x) -> Floss(x, parker))\nEmbellish(parker, oralie) -> Floss(parker, oralie)\nFugacious(oralie) and Embellish(oralie, parker) -> Floss(parker, enriqueta)\nforall x (Beaded(x) and Embellish(x, marcie) -> Floss(x, parker))\nforall x (Floss(x, parker) -> Embellish(x, marcie))\nforall x (Floss(x, oralie) -> Superlunar(x))\nforall x (Embellish(x, parker) -> Embellish(x, enriqueta))\n\nnot Embellish(parker, marcie)\n\nFloss(parker, oralie) and forall x (Floss(x, oralie) -> Superlunar(x)) -> therefore Superlunar(parker) Superlunar(parker) and forall x (Superlunar(x) -> Floss(x, parker)) -> therefore Floss(parker, parker) Floss(parker, parker) and forall x (Floss(x, parker) -> Embellish(x, marcie)) -> therefore Embellish(parker, marcie)\n\nFalse", "qdep": 3, "answer": "False", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The paule soup the linea. The paule is archaic. The paule is irresolute. The paule hijack the linea. The paule equal the linea. The elsi soup the linea. The elsi hijack the linea. The eulalie soup the paule. The eulalie soup the elsi. The eulalie soup the linea. The eulalie is archaic. The eulalie hijack the elsi. The eulalie equal the elsi. The linea hijack the paule. The linea hijack the eulalie. The linea equal the paule. If something hijack the paule then it hijack the eulalie. If something is deaf then it hijack the linea. If the linea equal the paule then the linea hijack the paule. If the paule is included and the paule equal the linea then the linea hijack the elsi. If something is irresolute and it equal the eulalie then it hijack the linea. If something hijack the linea then it equal the eulalie. If something hijack the paule then it is deaf. If something equal the linea then it equal the elsi. The paule does not need the eulalie.", "logic": "\nSoup(paule, linea)\nArchaic(paule)\nIrresolute(paule)\nHijack(paule, linea)\nEqual(paule, linea)\nSoup(elsi, linea)\nHijack(elsi, linea)\nSoup(eulalie, paule)\nSoup(eulalie, elsi)\nSoup(eulalie, linea)\nArchaic(eulalie)\nHijack(eulalie, elsi)\nEqual(eulalie, elsi)\nHijack(linea, paule)\nHijack(linea, eulalie)\nEqual(linea, paule)\nforall x (Hijack(x, paule) -> Hijack(x, eulalie))\nforall x (Deaf(x) -> Hijack(x, linea))\nEqual(linea, paule) -> Hijack(linea, paule)\nIncluded(paule) and Equal(paule, linea) -> Hijack(linea, elsi)\nforall x (Irresolute(x) and Equal(x, eulalie) -> Hijack(x, linea))\nforall x (Hijack(x, linea) -> Equal(x, eulalie))\nforall x (Hijack(x, paule) -> Deaf(x))\nforall x (Equal(x, linea) -> Equal(x, elsi))\n\nnot Hijack(paule, eulalie)\n\nforall x (Hijack(x, paule) -> Hijack(x, eulalie)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The helaina crust the jacquelyn. The helaina is phocine. The helaina is murdered. The helaina improve the jacquelyn. The helaina unpack the jacquelyn. The marthe crust the jacquelyn. The marthe improve the jacquelyn. The calida crust the helaina. The calida crust the marthe. The calida crust the jacquelyn. The calida is phocine. The calida improve the marthe. The calida unpack the marthe. The jacquelyn improve the helaina. The jacquelyn improve the calida. The jacquelyn unpack the helaina. If something improve the helaina then it improve the calida. If something is slashing then it improve the jacquelyn. If the jacquelyn unpack the helaina then the jacquelyn improve the helaina. If the helaina is dingy and the helaina unpack the jacquelyn then the jacquelyn improve the marthe. If something is murdered and it unpack the calida then it improve the jacquelyn. If something improve the jacquelyn then it unpack the calida. If something improve the helaina then it is slashing. If something unpack the jacquelyn then it unpack the marthe. The jacquelyn unpack the marthe.", "logic": "\nCrust(helaina, jacquelyn)\nPhocine(helaina)\nMurdered(helaina)\nImprove(helaina, jacquelyn)\nUnpack(helaina, jacquelyn)\nCrust(marthe, jacquelyn)\nImprove(marthe, jacquelyn)\nCrust(calida, helaina)\nCrust(calida, marthe)\nCrust(calida, jacquelyn)\nPhocine(calida)\nImprove(calida, marthe)\nUnpack(calida, marthe)\nImprove(jacquelyn, helaina)\nImprove(jacquelyn, calida)\nUnpack(jacquelyn, helaina)\nforall x (Improve(x, helaina) -> Improve(x, calida))\nforall x (Slashing(x) -> Improve(x, jacquelyn))\nUnpack(jacquelyn, helaina) -> Improve(jacquelyn, helaina)\nDingy(helaina) and Unpack(helaina, jacquelyn) -> Improve(jacquelyn, marthe)\nforall x (Murdered(x) and Unpack(x, calida) -> Improve(x, jacquelyn))\nforall x (Improve(x, jacquelyn) -> Unpack(x, calida))\nforall x (Improve(x, helaina) -> Slashing(x))\nforall x (Unpack(x, jacquelyn) -> Unpack(x, marthe))\n\nUnpack(jacquelyn, marthe)\n\nforall x (Unpack(x, jacquelyn) -> Unpack(x, marthe)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 1, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The nannette marbleise the chloette. The nannette is adamantine. The nannette is urbanized. The nannette pooch the chloette. The nannette garland the chloette. The norri marbleise the chloette. The norri pooch the chloette. The clint marbleise the nannette. The clint marbleise the norri. The clint marbleise the chloette. The clint is adamantine. The clint pooch the norri. The clint garland the norri. The chloette pooch the nannette. The chloette pooch the clint. The chloette garland the nannette. If something pooch the nannette then it pooch the clint. If something is timed then it pooch the chloette. If the chloette garland the nannette then the chloette pooch the nannette. If the nannette is colorfast and the nannette garland the chloette then the chloette pooch the norri. If something is urbanized and it garland the clint then it pooch the chloette. If something pooch the chloette then it garland the clint. If something pooch the nannette then it is timed. If something garland the chloette then it garland the norri. The clint does not see the clint.", "logic": "\nMarbleise(nannette, chloette)\nAdamantine(nannette)\nUrbanized(nannette)\nPooch(nannette, chloette)\nGarland(nannette, chloette)\nMarbleise(norri, chloette)\nPooch(norri, chloette)\nMarbleise(clint, nannette)\nMarbleise(clint, norri)\nMarbleise(clint, chloette)\nAdamantine(clint)\nPooch(clint, norri)\nGarland(clint, norri)\nPooch(chloette, nannette)\nPooch(chloette, clint)\nGarland(chloette, nannette)\nforall x (Pooch(x, nannette) -> Pooch(x, clint))\nforall x (Timed(x) -> Pooch(x, chloette))\nGarland(chloette, nannette) -> Pooch(chloette, nannette)\nColorfast(nannette) and Garland(nannette, chloette) -> Pooch(chloette, norri)\nforall x (Urbanized(x) and Garland(x, clint) -> Pooch(x, chloette))\nforall x (Pooch(x, chloette) -> Garland(x, clint))\nforall x (Pooch(x, nannette) -> Timed(x))\nforall x (Garland(x, chloette) -> Garland(x, norri))\n\nnot Garland(clint, clint)\n\nforall x (Pooch(x, chloette) -> Garland(x, clint)) <- forall x (Timed(x) -> Pooch(x, chloette)) <- forall x (Pooch(x, nannette) -> Timed(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 3, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The quillan blanch the andee. The quillan is sinusoidal. The quillan is deniable. The quillan sellotape the andee. The quillan stigmatise the andee. The zebulon blanch the andee. The zebulon sellotape the andee. The cassy blanch the quillan. The cassy blanch the zebulon. The cassy blanch the andee. The cassy is sinusoidal. The cassy sellotape the zebulon. The cassy stigmatise the zebulon. The andee sellotape the quillan. The andee sellotape the cassy. The andee stigmatise the quillan. If something sellotape the quillan then it sellotape the cassy. If something is degage then it sellotape the andee. If the andee stigmatise the quillan then the andee sellotape the quillan. If the quillan is revived and the quillan stigmatise the andee then the andee sellotape the zebulon. If something is deniable and it stigmatise the cassy then it sellotape the andee. If something sellotape the andee then it stigmatise the cassy. If something sellotape the quillan then it is degage. If something stigmatise the andee then it stigmatise the zebulon. The cassy sellotape the andee.", "logic": "\nBlanch(quillan, andee)\nSinusoidal(quillan)\nDeniable(quillan)\nSellotape(quillan, andee)\nStigmatise(quillan, andee)\nBlanch(zebulon, andee)\nSellotape(zebulon, andee)\nBlanch(cassy, quillan)\nBlanch(cassy, zebulon)\nBlanch(cassy, andee)\nSinusoidal(cassy)\nSellotape(cassy, zebulon)\nStigmatise(cassy, zebulon)\nSellotape(andee, quillan)\nSellotape(andee, cassy)\nStigmatise(andee, quillan)\nforall x (Sellotape(x, quillan) -> Sellotape(x, cassy))\nforall x (Degage(x) -> Sellotape(x, andee))\nStigmatise(andee, quillan) -> Sellotape(andee, quillan)\nRevived(quillan) and Stigmatise(quillan, andee) -> Sellotape(andee, zebulon)\nforall x (Deniable(x) and Stigmatise(x, cassy) -> Sellotape(x, andee))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, andee) -> Stigmatise(x, cassy))\nforall x (Sellotape(x, quillan) -> Degage(x))\nforall x (Stigmatise(x, andee) -> Stigmatise(x, zebulon))\n\nSellotape(cassy, andee)\n\nforall x (Degage(x) -> Sellotape(x, andee)) <- forall x (Sellotape(x, quillan) -> Degage(x)) <- [no base fact] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 2, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The bee apprize the griff. The bee is hidebound. The bee is redemptory. The bee moonlight the griff. The bee cloister the griff. The georgine apprize the griff. The georgine moonlight the griff. The karleen apprize the bee. The karleen apprize the georgine. The karleen apprize the griff. The karleen is hidebound. The karleen moonlight the georgine. The karleen cloister the georgine. The griff moonlight the bee. The griff moonlight the karleen. The griff cloister the bee. If something moonlight the bee then it moonlight the karleen. If something is unenforced then it moonlight the griff. If the griff cloister the bee then the griff moonlight the bee. If the bee is violent and the bee cloister the griff then the griff moonlight the georgine. If something is redemptory and it cloister the karleen then it moonlight the griff. If something moonlight the griff then it cloister the karleen. If something moonlight the bee then it is unenforced. If something cloister the griff then it cloister the georgine. The griff does not chase the griff.", "logic": "\nApprize(bee, griff)\nHidebound(bee)\nRedemptory(bee)\nMoonlight(bee, griff)\nCloister(bee, griff)\nApprize(georgine, griff)\nMoonlight(georgine, griff)\nApprize(karleen, bee)\nApprize(karleen, georgine)\nApprize(karleen, griff)\nHidebound(karleen)\nMoonlight(karleen, georgine)\nCloister(karleen, georgine)\nMoonlight(griff, bee)\nMoonlight(griff, karleen)\nCloister(griff, bee)\nforall x (Moonlight(x, bee) -> Moonlight(x, karleen))\nforall x (Unenforced(x) -> Moonlight(x, griff))\nCloister(griff, bee) -> Moonlight(griff, bee)\nViolent(bee) and Cloister(bee, griff) -> Moonlight(griff, georgine)\nforall x (Redemptory(x) and Cloister(x, karleen) -> Moonlight(x, griff))\nforall x (Moonlight(x, griff) -> Cloister(x, karleen))\nforall x (Moonlight(x, bee) -> Unenforced(x))\nforall x (Cloister(x, griff) -> Cloister(x, georgine))\n\nnot Apprize(griff, griff)\n\nnot Apprize(griff, griff) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The hartley sabre the arlana. The hartley is credited. The hartley is cairned. The hartley dower the arlana. The hartley apply the arlana. The jehu sabre the arlana. The jehu dower the arlana. The giana sabre the hartley. The giana sabre the jehu. The giana sabre the arlana. The giana is credited. The giana dower the jehu. The giana apply the jehu. The arlana dower the hartley. The arlana dower the giana. The arlana apply the hartley. If something dower the hartley then it dower the giana. If something is crownless then it dower the arlana. If the arlana apply the hartley then the arlana dower the hartley. If the hartley is haematal and the hartley apply the arlana then the arlana dower the jehu. If something is cairned and it apply the giana then it dower the arlana. If something dower the arlana then it apply the giana. If something dower the hartley then it is crownless. If something apply the arlana then it apply the jehu. The arlana sabre the jehu.", "logic": "\nSabre(hartley, arlana)\nCredited(hartley)\nCairned(hartley)\nDower(hartley, arlana)\nApply(hartley, arlana)\nSabre(jehu, arlana)\nDower(jehu, arlana)\nSabre(giana, hartley)\nSabre(giana, jehu)\nSabre(giana, arlana)\nCredited(giana)\nDower(giana, jehu)\nApply(giana, jehu)\nDower(arlana, hartley)\nDower(arlana, giana)\nApply(arlana, hartley)\nforall x (Dower(x, hartley) -> Dower(x, giana))\nforall x (Crownless(x) -> Dower(x, arlana))\nApply(arlana, hartley) -> Dower(arlana, hartley)\nHaematal(hartley) and Apply(hartley, arlana) -> Dower(arlana, jehu)\nforall x (Cairned(x) and Apply(x, giana) -> Dower(x, arlana))\nforall x (Dower(x, arlana) -> Apply(x, giana))\nforall x (Dower(x, hartley) -> Crownless(x))\nforall x (Apply(x, arlana) -> Apply(x, jehu))\n\nSabre(arlana, jehu)\n\nSabre(arlana, jehu) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The alecia retain the emeline. The alecia is anionic. The alecia is brash. The alecia unbalance the emeline. The alecia sensualize the emeline. The allissa retain the emeline. The allissa unbalance the emeline. The jerrold retain the alecia. The jerrold retain the allissa. The jerrold retain the emeline. The jerrold is anionic. The jerrold unbalance the allissa. The jerrold sensualize the allissa. The emeline unbalance the alecia. The emeline unbalance the jerrold. The emeline sensualize the alecia. If something unbalance the alecia then it unbalance the jerrold. If something is afoul then it unbalance the emeline. If the emeline sensualize the alecia then the emeline unbalance the alecia. If the alecia is argive and the alecia sensualize the emeline then the emeline unbalance the allissa. If something is brash and it sensualize the jerrold then it unbalance the emeline. If something unbalance the emeline then it sensualize the jerrold. If something unbalance the alecia then it is afoul. If something sensualize the emeline then it sensualize the allissa. The jerrold does not chase the jerrold.", "logic": "\nRetain(alecia, emeline)\nAnionic(alecia)\nBrash(alecia)\nUnbalance(alecia, emeline)\nSensualize(alecia, emeline)\nRetain(allissa, emeline)\nUnbalance(allissa, emeline)\nRetain(jerrold, alecia)\nRetain(jerrold, allissa)\nRetain(jerrold, emeline)\nAnionic(jerrold)\nUnbalance(jerrold, allissa)\nSensualize(jerrold, allissa)\nUnbalance(emeline, alecia)\nUnbalance(emeline, jerrold)\nSensualize(emeline, alecia)\nforall x (Unbalance(x, alecia) -> Unbalance(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Afoul(x) -> Unbalance(x, emeline))\nSensualize(emeline, alecia) -> Unbalance(emeline, alecia)\nArgive(alecia) and Sensualize(alecia, emeline) -> Unbalance(emeline, allissa)\nforall x (Brash(x) and Sensualize(x, jerrold) -> Unbalance(x, emeline))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, emeline) -> Sensualize(x, jerrold))\nforall x (Unbalance(x, alecia) -> Afoul(x))\nforall x (Sensualize(x, emeline) -> Sensualize(x, allissa))\n\nnot Retain(jerrold, jerrold)\n\nnot Retain(jerrold, jerrold) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"} {"premises": "The wat loft the elfreda. The wat is gandhian. The wat is limiting. The wat backdate the elfreda. The wat shelve the elfreda. The corina loft the elfreda. The corina backdate the elfreda. The mohan loft the wat. The mohan loft the corina. The mohan loft the elfreda. The mohan is gandhian. The mohan backdate the corina. The mohan shelve the corina. The elfreda backdate the wat. The elfreda backdate the mohan. The elfreda shelve the wat. If something backdate the wat then it backdate the mohan. If something is auriculate then it backdate the elfreda. If the elfreda shelve the wat then the elfreda backdate the wat. If the wat is weeny and the wat shelve the elfreda then the elfreda backdate the corina. If something is limiting and it shelve the mohan then it backdate the elfreda. If something backdate the elfreda then it shelve the mohan. If something backdate the wat then it is auriculate. If something shelve the elfreda then it shelve the corina. The elfreda is gandhian.", "logic": "\nLoft(wat, elfreda)\nGandhian(wat)\nLimiting(wat)\nBackdate(wat, elfreda)\nShelve(wat, elfreda)\nLoft(corina, elfreda)\nBackdate(corina, elfreda)\nLoft(mohan, wat)\nLoft(mohan, corina)\nLoft(mohan, elfreda)\nGandhian(mohan)\nBackdate(mohan, corina)\nShelve(mohan, corina)\nBackdate(elfreda, wat)\nBackdate(elfreda, mohan)\nShelve(elfreda, wat)\nforall x (Backdate(x, wat) -> Backdate(x, mohan))\nforall x (Auriculate(x) -> Backdate(x, elfreda))\nShelve(elfreda, wat) -> Backdate(elfreda, wat)\nWeeny(wat) and Shelve(wat, elfreda) -> Backdate(elfreda, corina)\nforall x (Limiting(x) and Shelve(x, mohan) -> Backdate(x, elfreda))\nforall x (Backdate(x, elfreda) -> Shelve(x, mohan))\nforall x (Backdate(x, wat) -> Auriculate(x))\nforall x (Shelve(x, elfreda) -> Shelve(x, corina))\n\nGandhian(elfreda)\n\nGandhian(elfreda) <- [no supporting fact or rule] Cannot be determined from given premises.\n\nUnknown", "qdep": 0, "answer": "Unknown", "source": "RelNoneg-OWA-D3-1507"}